Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC_2026-10-06_AgendaPacket CITY OF ATASCADERO PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA MEETING INFORMATION: The Planning Commission meeting will be held in the City Council Chambers and in-person attendance will be available at that location. HOW TO OBSERVE THE MEETING REMOTELY: To observe remotely, residents can livestream the meeting on Zoom. The video recording of the meeting will be available through the City’s website and on the City’s YouTube Channel. To observe remotely using the Zoom platform please visit: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/83250238111 HOW TO SUBMIT PUBLIC COMMENT: Public comment may be provided in-person. Written public comments are accepted at pc-comments@atascadero.org. Comments should identify the Agenda Item Number in the subject line of the email. Such comments will be forwarded to the Planning Commission and made a part of the administrative record. To ensure distribution to the Planning Commission before consideration of an item, please submit comments not later than 12:00 p.m. the day of the meeting. All correspondence will be distributed to the Planning Commission, posted on the City’s website, and be made part of the official public record of the meeting. Please note, comments will not be read into the record. Please be aware that communications sent to the Planning Commission are public records and are subject to disclosure pursuant to the California Public Records Act and Brown Act unless exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Communications will not be edited for redactions and will be printed/posted as submitted. AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT ACCOMMODATIONS: Any member of the public who needs accommodations should contact the City Clerk’s Office at cityclerk@atascadero.org or by calling 805-470-3400 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time when services are needed. The City will use their best efforts to provide reasonable accommodations to afford as much accessibility as possible while also maintaining public safety in accordance with the City procedure for resolving reasonable accommodation requests. DISCLOSURE OF CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS: California Government Code section 84308 (“Levine Act”) requires a party to or participant in a proceeding involving a license, permit, or other entitlement, including all contracts other than competitively bid, labor, or personal employment contracts, to disclose any contribution of more than $500 that the party or participant (or their agent) has made to a member of the Planning Commission within the prior 12 months. The Planning Commission Member(s) who receive such a contribution are disqualified and not able to participate in the proceedings and are also required to disclose that fact for the official record of the subject proceedings. Disclosures must include the amount of the campaign contribution and identify the recipient Planning Commission Member and may be made either in writing to the City Clerk before the agenda item or by verbal disclosure during consideration. The Levine Act also prohibits, during the proceeding and for 12 months following a final decision, a party to or participant in (or their agent) a proceeding involving a license, permit, or other entitlement, including all contracts other than competitively bid, labor, or personal employment contracts, from making a contribution of more than $500 to any member of the Planning Commission or anyone running for City Council. Planning Commission agendas and minutes may be viewed on the City's website: www.atascadero.org/agendas Copies of the staff reports or other documentation relating to each item of business referred to on the Agenda are on file in the office of the Community Development Department and are available for public inspection on our website, www.atascadero.org. Resolutions will be allocated a number once they are approved by the Planning Commission. The Minutes of this meeting will reflect these numbers. All documents submitted by the public during Commission meetings that are made a part of the record or referred to in their statement will be noted in the Minutes and available for review by contacting the Community Development Department. All documents will be available for public inspection by appointment during City Hall business hours. CITY OF ATASCADERO PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA Tuesday, October 6, 2026, 6:00 p.m. City Hall Council Chambers, Fourth Floor 6500 Palma Avenue, Atascadero, California Pages A.CALL TO ORDER 1.Pledge of Allegiance B.ROLL CALL Chairperson Anderson Vice Chairperson Pennachio Commissioner Ferrell Commissioner Heath Commissioner Jones Commissioner Keen Commissioner O'Malley C.PUBLIC COMMENT (This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wishing to address the Commission on any matter not on this agenda and over which the Commission has jurisdiction. Speakers are limited to three minutes. Please state your name for the record before making your presentation. The Commission may take action to direct the staff to place a matter of business on a future agenda.) D.CONSENT CALENDAR (All items on the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and non- controversial by City staff and will be approved by one motion if no member of the Commission or public wishes to comment or ask questions.) 1.1. Draft Meeting Planning Commission 8/18/26 3 Recommendation: Planning Commission approve the August 18, 2026 Minutes. E.PLANNING COMMISSION BUSINESS None F.PUBLIC HEARINGS (For each of the following items, the public will be given an opportunity to speak. After a staff report, the Chair will open the public hearing and invite the applicant or applicant’s representative to make any comments. Members of the public will be invited to provide testimony to the Commission following the applicant. Speakers should state their name for the record and can address the Commission for three minutes. After all public comments have been received, the public hearing will be closed, and the Commission will discuss the item and take appropriate action(s). 1.Zoning Code Update (ZCH24-0040)9 Comprehensive update to Title 9 of the Atascadero Municipal Code, and updates to Title 11 (subdivisions) of the Atascadero Municipal Code to implement and provide consistency with the 2045 General Plan, integrate State Law, and implement existing City policy. A Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared for the 2045 General Plan and associated Zoning Code Update in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq., which was considered by the City Council on September 22, 2026. Recommendation: 1. Repeal and Replace Title 9, Zoning and Planning, including the official zoning map of the City, for consistency with the 2045 General Plan and the previously adopted 6th cycle Housing Element (2020-2028), and to modernize the City’s zoning regulations and make other conforming edits, and make a determination of consistency with the 2045 General Plan and Zoning Code Update and the Certified Final Environmental Impact Report pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (1) Draft Planning Commission Resolution A – segment A (2) Draft Planning Commission Resolution B – segment B (3) Draft Planning Commission Resolution C – segment C (4) Draft Planning Commission Resolution D – segment D (5) Draft Planning Commission Resolution E – remaining portions of ZCU 2. Adopt Draft Resolution F recommending that the City Council amend Title 11: Subdivisions to move standards for Lot Line Adjustments previously included in Title 9 to Title 11. G.MANAGEMENT REPORTS None H.COMMISSIONER COMMENTS AND REPORTS On their own initiative, Commissioners may make a brief announcement or a brief report on their own activities. I.DIRECTOR'S REPORT J.ADJOURNMENT Page 2 of 49 10/6/2026 | Item D1 Atascadero Planning Commission August 18, 2026 1 CITY OF ATASCADERO PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT MINUTES August 18, 2026, 6:00 p.m. City Hall Council Chambers, Fourth Floor 6500 Palma Avenue, Atascadero, California _____________________________________________________________________ A. CALL TO ORDER Chairperson Anderson called the meeting to order at 6:00 P.M. 1. Pledge of Allegiance Commissioner O'Malley led the Pledge of Allegiance. B. ROLL CALL Present: Chairperson Anderson, Vice Chairperson Pennachio, Commissioners Ferrell, Jones, Keen (6:06 pm), O’Malley Absent: Commissioner Heath Staff Present: Community Development Director Phil Dunsmore, Planning Manager Kelly Gleason, City Attorney Dave Fleishman, Recording Secretary Crystal Horn, Associate Planner Erick Gomez C. PUBLIC COMMENT Chairperson Anderson opened the Public Comment period. The following person spoke on this item: None Chairperson Anderson closed the Public Comment period. D. CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Draft Minutes Planning Commission 5-19-26 Recommendation: Planning Commission approve the May 19, 2026 Minutes Page 3 of 49 10/6/2026 | Item D1 Atascadero Planning Commission August 18, 2026 2 Chairperson Anderson opened the Public Comment period. The following person spoke on this item: None Chairperson Anderson closed the Public Comment period. MOTION BY: Commissioner Ferrell SECOND BY: Vice Chairperson Pennachio 1. Approve Consent Calendar AYES (4): Chairperson Anderson, Vice Chairperson Pennachio, Commissioner O'Malley, and Commissioner Ferrell ABSTAIN (1): Commissioner Jones ABSENT (2): Commissioner Keen, Commissioner Heath Motion Passed (4 to 0) E. PLANNING COMMISSION BUSINESS None F. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 6375-6385 Santa Ynez Small Lot Subdivision (SBDV26-0030) Master Plan of Development and Tentative Parcel Map AT 26-0011 for a small lot subdivision of 0.56-acres developed with four single-family units in the Residential Multiple-Family zoning district located at 6375, 6377, 6383, and 6385 Santa Ynez Avenue (APNs 030-281-024 and 030-281- 025). The properties will be subdivided into four lots. No additional residential units are proposed. The proposed project qualifies for a Class 15 exemption from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (California Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq., “CEQA”) and CEQA Guidelines (Title 14 California Code of Regulations §§ 15000, et seq.) Section 15315, Minor Land Divisions. Recommendation: Planning Commission adopt Draft PC Resolution approving a Master Plan of Development and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map AT26-0011 (SBDV26-0030), based on findings and subject to conditions of approval. Ex Parte: None Planner Gomez provided the staff report. Page 4 of 49 10/6/2026 | Item D1 Atascadero Planning Commission August 18, 2026 3 Planner Gomez, Director Dunsmore, and Planning Manager Gleason answered questions from the Commission Chairperson Anderson opened the Public Comment period. The following person spoke on this item: None Chairperson Anderson closed the Public Comment period. Max Zappas (owner and developer) spoke on this item. MOTION BY: Commissioner Jones SECOND BY: Vice Chairperson Pennachio 1. Adopt Draft PC Resolution approving a Master Plan of Development and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map AT26-0011 (SBDV26-0030), based on findings and subject to conditions of approval. AYES (6): Commissioner Keen, Chairperson Anderson, Vice Chairperson Pennachio, Commissioner O'Malley, Commissioner Jones, and Commissioner Ferrell ABSENT (1): Commissioner Heath Motion Passed (6 to 0) 2. 2045 Atascadero General Plan and final EIR – Recommendation for Adoption (GPA21-0067) Review and recommendation of the final draft of the Atascadero 2045 General Plan and its Environmental Document (Final EIR). The Plan culminates a 5-year process and establishes a vision for the next 20 years rooted in community, economic prosperity, quality public service, responsible growth, and consideration of our natural environment It was developed in collaboration with members of the community, interested parties, partner agencies, staff, and decision makers. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared for the 2045 General Plan and corresponding Zoning Code Update in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act. Recommendation: Adopt Draft PC Resolution A recommending that the City Council certify the Environmental Impact Report (EIR), adopt findings of fact pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081(a), adopt a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations for the 2045 General Plan and Zoning Code Update; and adopt the City of Atascadero 2045 General Plan consisting of the following elements: Land Use and Community Form, Economic Development, Mobility, Recreation and Open Space, Public Services and Infrastructure, and Safety and Emergency Preparedness. Page 5 of 49 10/6/2026 | Item D1 Atascadero Planning Commission August 18, 2026 4 Planning Manager Gleason provided the staff report. Director Dunsmore and Planning Manager Gleason answered questions from the Commission Chairperson Anderson opened the Public Comment period. The following person spoke on this item: None Chairperson Anderson closed the Public Comment period. Medium Density Multifamily and Mixed Use Land Use Designations. Due to a conflict of interest, Chairperson Anderson and Commissioner Jones recused themselves from consideration of the Medium Density Multifamily and Mixed Use Land Use Designations. However, because a quorum was not present following the recusals, Vice Chairperson Pennachio, Commissioner O’Malley, and Commissioner Ferrell returned to achieve a quorum and participate in the discussion and vote on Section (1) of Section 4 of this Resolution under the rule of necessity. MOTION BY: Commissioner Keen SECOND BY: Commissioner Ferrell 1. Planning Commission recommends the City Council of the City of Atascadero adopt the Medium Density Multifamily Land Use Designation and Mixed Use Land Use Designation in accordance with the 2045 General Plan, as shown in Exhibit B. AYES (4): Commissioner Keen, Vice Chairperson Pennachio, Commissioner O'Malley, and Commissioner Ferrell CONFLICT (2): Chairperson Anderson, and Commissioner Jones ABSENT (1): Commissioner Heath Motion Passed (4 to 0) Low Density Multifamily Land Use Designation. Due to a conflict of interest, Chairperson Anderson, Vice Chairperson Pennachio, Commissioner O’Malley, and Commissioner Ferrell previously recused themselves from consideration of the Low Density Multifamily Land Use Designation but returned as a result of the rule of necessity. Commissioner Jones, not having a conflict on this designation, also returned. MOTION BY: Commissioner Keen SECOND BY: Vice Chairperson Pennachio 1. Planning Commission recommends the City Council of the City of Atascadero adopt the Low Density Multifamily Land Use Designation in accordance with the 2045 General Plan, as shown in Exhibit B. Page 6 of 49 10/6/2026 | Item D1 Atascadero Planning Commission August 18, 2026 5 AYES (5): Commissioner Keen, Vice Chairperson Pennachio, Commissioner O'Malley, Commissioner Jones, and Commissioner Ferrell CONFLICT (1): Chairperson Anderson ABSENT (1): Commissioner Heath Motion Passed (5 to 0) Remainder of the 2045 General Plan Changes. There were no conflicts of interest requiring recusal and all commissioners returned. MOTION BY: Commissioner Keen SECOND BY: Commissioner O'Malley 1. Planning Commission recommends the City Council of the City of Atascadero adopt the remainder of the changes and corresponding CEQA recommendations, and they voted 6-0 to recommend the City Council of the City of Atascadero adopt the remaining sections of the 2045 General Plan, as shown in Exhibit B. AYES (6): Commissioner Keen, Chairperson Anderson, Vice Chairperson Pennachio, Commissioner O'Malley, Commissioner Jones, and Commissioner Ferrell ABSENT (1): Commissioner Heath Motion Passed (6 to 0) G. MANAGEMENT REPORTS None H. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS AND REPORTS Commissioner O’Malley spoke about the success of the first day of the new school year and downtown. Commissioner Keen spoke about downtown parking. Vice Chairperson Pennachio spoke about the development of parks and sidewalks in the City. I. DIRECTOR'S REPORT Community Development Director Phil Dunsmore provided an update on current projects and events. J. ADJOURNMENT Chairperson Anderson adjourned the meeting at 7:18 PM Page 7 of 49 10/6/2026 | Item D1 Atascadero Planning Commission August 18, 2026 6 MINUTES PREPARED BY: ____________________________ Crystal Horn, Recording Secretary Administrative Assistant APPROVED: Page 8 of 49 CITY OF ATASCADERO PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Item F1 Department: Community Development Date: 10/06/2026 Placement: Public Hearing TO: PHIL DUNSMORE, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR FROM: KELLY GLEASON, PLANNING MANAGER PREPARED BY: KELLY GLEASON, PLANNING MANAGER SUBJECT: Comprehensive Zoning Code Update RECOMMENDATION: Planning Commission recommends the City Council: 1. Repeal and Replace Title 9, Zoning and Planning, including the official zoning map of the City, for consistency with the 2045 General Plan and the previously adopted 6th cycle Housing Element (2020-2028), and to modernize the City’s zoning regulations and make other conforming edits, and make a determination of consistency with the 2045 General Plan and Zoning Code Update and the Certified Final Environmental Impact Report pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (2) Draft Planning Commission Resolution A – segment A (3) Draft Planning Commission Resolution B – segment B (4) Draft Planning Commission Resolution C – segment C (5) Draft Planning Commission Resolution D – segment D (6) Draft Planning Commission Resolution E – remaining portions of ZCU 2. Adopt Draft Resolution F recommending that the City Council amend Title 11: Subdivisions to move standards for Lot Line Adjustments previously included in Title 9 to Title 11. BACKGROUND: The Comprehensive Zoning Code update (ZCH24-0040) began in 2024 to dovetail with adoption of the 2045 General Plan. The Zoning Code update implements the new zoning districts (Placetypes) into the Municipal Code and reflects the General Plan policy direction. The comprehensive update also provided the opportunity to reorganize the code for greater readability while streamlining processes, implementing City Council goals, and corresponding with the latest State laws. The zoning code update is not intended to “fix” existing standards in the code that are unrelated to General Plan adoption, however, some sections have been updated for clarity or to incorporate current City policy. Page 9 of 49 10/06/26 | Item F1 | Staff Report As part of the update process, staff brought forward a number of topics to Planning Commission and City Council for discussion and direction through a series of study sessions. Topics discussed included:  Streamlining and clarifying processes and procedures o Streamlined AUP process o Increased noticing radius for projects requiring expanded neighborhood input o Exempting projects from the Design Review Committee o Adding current City processes for business licenses and permit reviews into the Zoning Code  Finalization of the zoning map, consistent with new General Plan Placetypes  Mixed-use zoning districts and development standards  Uses in Commercial zoning districts and development standards for the innovation/flex zone  Minimum retail hours in Downtown Zoning District  Updates to the Tree Ordinance This report is a final review of the comprehensive update to Title 9: Planning and Zoning. The entirety of the Title will be repealed and replaced with the modified and reorganized code. A full draft of the code is also available to review at: https://www.atascadero.org/comprehensive-zoning-code-update. DISCUSSION: The Zoning Code update will consolidate and reorganize code sections for greater readability, transparency, and public access. Through this process, Title 9 (Planning and Zoning) will be reorganized to provide a more understandable format for applicants and the community. Title 9 currently has 18 chapters with development and performance standards spread throughout multiple chapters. The revised organization consolidates these topics into 8 chapters, as follows:  Ch 1: Enactment And Applicability  Ch 2: Zoning Districts, Allowable Uses, and Development Standards  Ch 3: Regulations Applicable to All Zoning Districts  Ch 4: Standards for Specific Uses  Ch 5: Nonconformities  Ch 6: Entitlement Processing Procedures  Ch 7: Zoning Code Administration  Ch 8: Definitions CHAPTER 1: ENACTMENT AND APPLICABILITY Chapter 1 provides the legal and structural framework for the zoning code. The Chapter establishes the purpose and applicability of the Title, describes the relationship to the General Plan and other ordinances, provides procedures for interpretation, and establishes the zoning districts and official zoning map. No changes of note are included in this chapter with the update. Page 10 of 49 10/06/26 | Item F1 | Staff Report CHAPTER 2: ZONING DISTRICTS, ALLOWABLE USES, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The revised Chapter 2 consolidates all development-related information into one chapter; readers can start here to understand both the permitted uses and required development standards for the zoning district. This Chapter saw the more significant changes related to alignments to the 2045 General Plan. The chapter is grouped by:  Residential zoning districts  Commercial and industrial zoning districts  Mixed Use and Downtown zoning districts  Agriculture zoning districts  Public and Open Space zoning districts, and  Overlay zoning districts Uses by Zoning District The Land Use Tables are revised to meet the 2045 General Plan Placetypes for each zoning district. Chapter 2 contains the land use regulations specific to each of the zoning districts, with land use tables that define which zoning districts allow which uses, and whether a use permit is required. Each land use in the land use tables correlate with new land use definitions in Chapter 8. The Land Use definitions listed in the current code have been updated periodically to respond to State laws and emerging trends. However, the comprehensive zoning code update modernizes definitions, consolidating antiquated and unused definitions for ease of use, and aligns future land uses with the vision for each zoning district while recognizing the pattern of existing land uses. Development Standards by Zoning District Chapter 2 also contains development standards for each zoning district, including general development standards, minimum lot size standards, density standards, and any special regulations for any district included within the section. Many standards in this section have been reorganized into charts for enhanced readability. Language has been simplified, but the general standards remain the same. Oher changes of note include:  Allowing small scale commercial uses within the multi-family zoning districts in certain areas to allow flexibility for neighborhood gathering spaces  Reducing the level of review needed for certain uses aligned with City permit streamlining goals. The following uses were reduced from a Conditional Use Permit (Planning Commission) to an Administrative Use Permit (Director): o Laundromats o Caretakers' units o Horticultural Specialties with outdoor sales o Warehousing and Wholesaling o Brewery – Production Page 11 of 49 10/06/26 | Item F1 | Staff Report  Establishing minimum hours for retail tenants in the Downtown Commercial zone.  Defining Tattoo parlors and piercing business as distinct uses.  Establishing small lot subdivision standards for the new Small Lot Residential zoning district based on PD-17 standards.  Identifying development standards for the new Mixed-Use zoning districts.  Identifying development standards for the Commercial Innovation zoning district.  Repealing outdated Planned Developments that were previously built out and meet current zoning regulations. CHAPTER 3: REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO ALL ZONING DISTRICTS Chapter 3 provides the development standards that are applicable to all zoning districts, such as rules of measurement, the Native Tree Regulations, Objective Design Standards, and the Sign Ordinance. It details the density bonus project requirements, grading and drainage standards (including hillside grading requirements), archeological and historic resources, and landscaping and lighting requirements. Chapter 3 includes the bulk of the objective design and development standards for all projects, regardless of zoning district. Changes of note in Chapter 3 Include:  Minor changes to the Native Tree Regulations related to the removal of dead trees  Added exemptions for outdoor amplified sound in the Downtown zoning district when not adjacent to residential properties.  Reorganization of Lot Line Adjustment standards; moving from Title 9 (Planning and Zoning) to Title 11 (Subdivisions).  Revision to the parking regulations to align with the updated land use tables, and modifications to certain commercial parking ratio standards, such as eating establishments, to facilitate ease of use for applicants and decision makers. The new code allows for buildings less than 2,500 sf in size to change use without requiring new parking calculations. CHAPTER 4: STANDARDS FOR SPECIFIC USES Chapter 4 provides standards for particular land uses, including performance standards and development standards that are tailored to the use rather than the zone. Chapter 4 contains use- related standards including, but not limited to:  Standards for Accessory Dwelling Units,  Home Occupations,  Temporary Uses,  Urban Dwelling Units,  Cannabis Operations,  Manufactured Homes,  RV Parks, and  Vehicle Fueling Stations. Minor updates were included to accommodate the following new uses:  Electricity Generation and Storage Facilities Page 12 of 49 10/06/26 | Item F1 | Staff Report  Fitness Facilities Multiple existing special use sections in Chapter 4 were reorganized to be grouped with similar uses for readability. The following standards were amended to accommodate current practices, expand opportunities, or comply with State law:  Large scale livestock specialties (i.e., dairies) were eliminated from the Agriculture zone.  Car wash standards were updated to allow for attended facilities. Previous standards only addressed automated car washes.  Day care standards were updated to clarify that they are allowed in all zoning districts accessory to a primary use to serve on-site business employees.  Clarifying standards were added to Agricultural Produce Stands to expand opportunities while maintaining safety.  New standards were added for self-storage facilities to ensure high-quality architecture, landscaping, and adequate parking.  Animal keeping standards clarified to allow bee-keeping and chickens in residential zoning districts.  The AUP requirement for Home Occupation employees was removed in cases where no employees report to the site. CHAPTER 5: NONCONFORMITIES This Chapter replaces our existing non-conforming code section while keeping primary code sections and making it more readable. Changes of note include clarifying when a non-conforming structure is considered lost or damaged by fire, earthquake, explosion, or other force. Clarity has also been added to describe what level of landscape improvements need to be made when development is proposed on a site with existing improvements. CHAPTER 6: ENTITLEMENT PROCESSING PROCEDURES Chapter 6 outlines decision making authority and procedures for each application or action type, including legislative, discretionary, and ministerial actions. The reorganization of this Chapter includes a table to clarify processes and includes all processes and permits overseen by the Planning Division. One of the significant changes to department process includes the elimination of the need for the Design Review Committee. The Design Review Committee (DRC) was established to provide site and architectural design review for multi-family and commercial projects. In recent years, most of the duties of the Design Review Committee have been assumed by the Community Development Director through the adoption of Objective Design Standards or the Planning Commission as the higher review authority for entitlement applications. This includes the design review of multi-family and commercial development projects. Eliminating the DRC reduces redundancy in review processes for commercial projects. The existing code included a number of development-regulation specific modifications that could be made either by the Planning Commission or staff for such things as fence height, minor parking modifications, and required setbacks or landscaping in certain instances, among others. The Page 13 of 49 10/06/26 | Item F1 | Staff Report modified code would formalize these modifications and identify clear findings for approval for decision makers to enhance clarity for users. CHAPTER 7: ZONING CODE ADMINISTRATION Chapter 7 outlines the administrative responsibilities related to implementation of the Zoning Code including:  Appeals,  Public noticing,  Entitlement enactment,  Modification, and revocation; and  Enforcement. Amendments include the formalization of a process for the Community Development Director to make a finding of consistency which will be referenced throughout the code. Administrative Use Permits (AUP) Formerly, all entitlements subject to an AUP required a formal hearing. The new zoning allows for an AUP action without a hearing unless requested. Notification would still be sent for AUPs; however, a hearing would only be held upon request of either the applicant or an interested party. This process would also apply to Precise Plan applications under the modified code, which currently do not have a clearly identified approval process. As directed by Council, the new Zoning includes an increased notification radius for General Plan Amendments, Zoning Map Amendments and similar applications. Increased Notification Notification is increased as follows:  Increase radius for General Plan Amendments and Zoning Map Amendments (from standard 300 ft to 500 ft) in zoning districts other than the RR zone, which currently includes a 1,000-foot radius to account for larger parcel sizes.  Include owners and occupants in noticing requirements to facilitate cost recovery CHAPTER 8: DEFINITIONS Chapter 8 consolidates two sections of definitions in our existing code: Land Use definitions and General definitions. Chapter 8 maintains separate sections for each of these definition types but consolidates all definitions into one Chapter. Land Use definitions have been updated to correspond to all uses listed in the land use tables and General Definitions have been updated to be current and include readable and clear graphics. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: Because the comprehensive zoning code update implements the 2045 General Plan, the EIR for the General Plan included analysis specifically related to zoning code implementation. The General Plan EIR was certified on September 22, 2026 by the City Council in conjunction with their adoption of the 2045 General Plan. Page 14 of 49 10/06/26 | Item F1 | Staff Report NEXT STEPS: Staff will forward Planning Commission’s recommendation to the City Council for final adoption. Final adoption is scheduled for the October 27th Council meeting. The new code would return for second reading on November 10th and, if adopted on second reading, become effective on December 10, 2026. CONCLUSION: Adoption of the comprehensive zoning code update culminates a 2.5-year process designed to implement the new General Plan. Implementation through the Zoning Code is critical to achieving the vision set forth by the Council, Commission, and the community. The code update focuses on reorganization of Title 9 for readability and accessibility while incorporating new zoning districts to correspond to updated General Plan Placetypes. This ensures that the City can provide for consistent implementation following adoption of the new General Plan. General Plan policies related to open space preservation, economic development, and community character have been maintained or added to the zoning code as applicable, consistent with the 2045 Plan. Reorganization of the code will consolidate standards and make the code easier to read, providing transparency to the public and ease of staff review. FISCAL IMPACT: The City budgeted $150,000 for the zoning code update project. The total project includes $127,833 for consultant services with the remaining funds allocated for online codification using the City’s current vendor. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Draft Resolution A – Low-Density and Medium-Density Residential 2. Draft Resolution B – Single-Family Residential Districts 3. Draft Resolution C – Downtown, Commercial, and Industrial Zoning Districts 4. Draft Resolution D – Mixed-Use Zoning Districts 5. Draft Resolution E – All Other Zoning Regulations Exhibit A: Title 9 - Planning and Zoning Code Text Exhibit B: Official Zoning Map 6. Draft resolution F – Resolution amending Title 11 to include Lot Line Adjustment Standards Exhibits A and B to Resolution E can be found online at: https://www.atascadero.org/comprehensive-zoning-code-update Page 15 of 49 10/06/26 | Item F1 | Attachment 1 SEGMENT A MULTI-FAMILY ZONING DISTRICTS 13135-0001\3303609v1.doc DRAFT PC RESOLUTION A A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING THE CITY COUNCIL AMEND TITLE 9 (PLANNING AND ZONING) TO ESTABLISH THE LOW DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRCT (RMF-12) AND THE MEDIUM DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRCT (RMF-24), PERMITTED USES IN THE RMF-12 AND RMF-24 ZONING DISTRICTS, AND REGULATIONS FOR MULTI-FAMILY ZONING DISTRICTS AND AMEND THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP AND TITLE 9 OF THE ATASCADERO MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY (SEGMENT A OF THE ZONING CODE UPDATE) TO REFLECT THE SAME FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE 2045 ATASCADERO GENERAL PLAN, INCLUDING THE PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED 6TH CYCLE HOUSING ELEMENT (2020-2028), AND MAKING A DETERMINATION THAT SEGMENT A OF THE ZONING CODE UPDATE IS WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE 2045 GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING CODE UPDATE AND NO FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW IS REQUIRED PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT WHEREAS, State Government Code Section 65860 requires all cities to have a consistent General Plan and Zoning regulations within 180 days of adoption of a General Plan; and WHEREAS, in July 2021, the City began the process of comprehensively updating the City's General Plan, and since this time City officials, City staff, and community members have been actively involved in the preparation of the 2045 General Plan; and WHEREAS, in conformance with State Law, the City elicited public input and involvement on the 2045 General Plan, provided opportunities for consultation to affected public agencies and California Native American tribes on the 2045 General Plan, and drafted the 2045 General Plan to contain all mandatory elements of a general plan; and WHEREAS, on November 10, 2020 the City Council of the City of Atascadero (“City Council”) adopted Resolution No. 2020-0079 adopting the 6th Cycle Housing Element (2020- 2028) and determined the action was exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility the Housing Element, which does not approve any development project, or other physical change to the environment and is a policy document setting forth the City’s policies to plan for City’s regional housing Page 16 of 49 -2- 13135-0001\3303609v1.doc needs allocation, may have a significant effect on the environment; and WHEREAS, on January 12, 2021, the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) certified the City of Atascadero’s 6th Cycle Housing Element (2020-2028); and WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 65860 requires the City’s zoning ordinances to be consistent with its General Plan such that the land uses authorized by the zoning ordinance are compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses, and programs specified in the General Plan; and WHEREAS, to implement the 2045 General Plan, including the 6th Cycle Housing Element (2020-2028), and to modernize the City’s zoning regulations and make other conforming edits, the City prepared changes to Title 9 (Zoning and Planning), including the zoning map (“Zoning Code Update”); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the requirements of CEQA, the City prepared an Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 2024070598) in coordination of the 2045 General Plan and Zoning Code Update. The Final Environmental Impact Report (“Final EIR”) analyzed impacts associated with the implementation of the 2045 General Plan and corresponding Zoning Code Update, fully describes the project, existing conditions within the City of Atascadero, analyzes potential environmental impacts of implementing the project, identifies all feasible mitigation measures to minimize significant impacts to a less than significant level, and identifies those impacts that remain significant and unavoidable; and WHEREAS, on September 22, 2026 after a duly noticed public hearing, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2026-063 certifying the Final EIR for the 2045 General Plan and Zoning Code Update (SCH # 2024070598) and adopting the CEQA Findings of Fact, Statement of Overriding Considerations and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (“MMRP”) and Resolution No. 2026-064 adopting the 2045 General Plan; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code Sections 65853 – 65855, the Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing and provide recommendations to the City Council on such zoning code amendments; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on October 6, 2026 at which time all interested persons were given the opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 18706 of Title 2, Division 6, Chapter 7, Article 1 of the California Code of Regulations, due to conflicts of interest, the Planning Commission segmented decisions regarding the following (collectively referred to as the “Zoning Actions”):  Creation of the Low Density Multi-Family Residential Zoning District (RMF-12) and Medium Density Multi-Family Residential Zoning District (RMF-24) and corresponding amendment to the Zoning Map to reflect the same, permitted uses for the RMF-12 and RMF-24 Zones, and regulations for Multi-Family Zoning Districts Page 17 of 49 -3- 13135-0001\3303609v1.doc (collectively, “Segment A”);  Creation of the Residential Suburban Zoning District (RS), Residential Small Lot Single Family Zoning District (RSL), and Residential Single Family – 0.5 Acres Zoning District (RSF-0.5) and corresponding amendment to the Zoning Map to reflect the same, permitted uses and regulations for the RS, RSL, and RSF-0.5 Zoning Districts, and regulations for Single Family Zoning Districts (collectively, “Segment B”);  Creation of the Downtown Commercial Zoning District (DC), Commercial Zoning District (C), and Industrial Zoning District (I) and corresponding amendment to the Zoning Map to reflect the same, permitted uses for the DC, C and I Zoning Districts, and regulations for Commercial and Industrial Zoning Districts (collectively, “Segment C”); and  Creation of the Mixed Use – 3 (MU-3) Zoning District and corresponding amendment to the Zoning Map to reflect the same, permitted uses for the MU-3 Zoning District, and regulations for Mixed Use Zoning Districts (collectively, “Segment D”). WHEREAS, Chairperson Anderson, Vice Chairperson Pennachio, and Commissioners Jones, O’Malley and Ferrell had conflicts of interest with Segment A; Chairperson Anderson, Vice Chairperson Pennachio and Commissioner Jones had conflicts of interest with Segment B; Chairperson Anderson, Vice Chairperson Pennachio and Commissioner O’Malley had conflicts of interest with Segment C; and Chairperson Anderson and Commissioner Jones had conflicts of interest with Segment D; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Segments A through D in accordance with the rules of segmentation and the Rule of Necessity as needed to reach a quorum; and, WHEREAS, for each Segment, the participating Commissioners considered the Zoning Actions and found the proposed Zoning Actions (i) are consistent with the General Plan policies and all other applicable ordinances and policies of the City and (ii) will provide for the orderly and efficient use of lands; and WHEREAS, when all conflicts of interest amongst the Commissioners were resolved, all seven members of the Planning Commission considered the remainder of the Zoning Code Update; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Code Update was reviewed for compliance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines (Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3 of the California Code of Regulations). The Zoning Code Update relies on and is consistent with the environmental analysis conducted as part of the 2045 General Plan process for the General Plan and Zoning Code Update. The Zoning Code Update implements the intent, policies and goals of the 2045 General Plan. In addition, the Zoning Code Update was identified as part of the Project Description in the Final EIR. The impacts associated with the proposed changes are consistent with the scope of those previously analyzed by the certified Final EIR for the 2045 General Plan and Zoning Code Update. Page 18 of 49 -4- 13135-0001\3303609v1.doc Therefore, the proposed Zoning Code Update is within the scope of the Final EIR and no further environmental analysis is required pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15168. NOW THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Recitals set forth above are true and correct and are adopted as findings in support of this Resolution. SECTION 2. The findings made in this Resolution are based upon the information and evidence set forth in the Recitals to this Resolution, the Zoning Code Update (attached as Exhibit A and Exhibit B to Resolution No. ________), the Final EIR for the 2045 General Plan and Zoning Code Update (as certified by the City Council by adopted Resolution No. 2026-063 and a copy of which is on file with the City), the 2045 General Plan (as adopted by the City Council by adopted Resolution No. 2026-064 and a copy of which is on file with the City), and upon other substantial evidence that has been presented at the hearing and in the record of this proceeding. SECTION 3. The Planning Commission hereby finds, in the exercise of its independent judgment and based on substantial evidence in the whole of the record, and recommends that the City Council find, that this Segment A of the Zoning Code Update is consistent with, and within the scope of, the environmental analysis conducted as part of the 2045 General Plan and Zoning Code Update Final EIR and that no further environmental review is required, including pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166, or CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 or 15168, because: (i) No information has been presented to the City to demonstrate that any substantial changes have occurred with respect to the Project involving new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (ii) No information has been presented to the City to demonstrate that any substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken involving new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and (iii) No information has been presented to the City to demonstrate that there is any new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the Final EIR was certified as complete showing that the Project will have any significant or more severe effects than those discussed in the Final EIR, or that additional mitigation measures or alternatives would substantially reduce any significant effects on the environment disclosed in the Final EIR. SECTION 4. The Zoning Code Update, 2045 General Plan, the Final EIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, Findings of Fact, and Statement of Overriding Considerations regarding the Final EIR for the 2045 General Plan and Zoning Code Update, agenda reports, technical studies, appendices, plans, specifications and other documents and materials that constitute the record of proceedings upon which this Resolution is based on, are on-file for public examination during normal business hours at the City of Atascadero City Hall, 6500 Palma Avenue, Atascadero, California 93422 and available on the City’s website at www.atascadero.org. Each of these documents is incorporated herein by reference in connection with making the findings and approvals taken by the Planning Commission in this Resolution. Page 19 of 49 -5- 13135-0001\3303609v1.doc SECTION 5. This Segment A of the Zoning Code Update implements the goals and policies of the 2045 General Plan and is found consistent with the requirements of the General Plan. This Segment A of the Zoning Code Update will provide for the orderly and efficient use of lands. SECTION 6. In accordance with Section 18706 of Title 2, Division 6, Chapter 7, Article 1 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission segmented the decisions regarding the Zoning Actions. Due to conflict of interests, Chairperson Anderson, Vice Chairperson Pennachio, and Commissioners Jones, O’Malley and Ferrell recused themselves until their conflicts of interest were resolved. The Planning Commission considered Segment A first. Pursuant to the Rule of Necessity, the Planning Commission randomly selected Commissioners ____ and _____ to rejoin the Planning Commission for consideration of Segment A. Based on all the documents and other evidence presented in connection with this proceeding and in this Resolution, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that, as part of the comprehensive repeal and replace of Title 9 (Zoning and Planning) and the Official Zoning Map of the City of Atascadero, the City Council approve Segment A as follows: 1. Establish the Low Density Multi-Family Residential Zoning District (RMF-12) as shown in the Official Zoning Map of the City of Atascadero, included as Exhibit B to Resolution No. __________, and amend the Official Zoning Map to reflect the same. 2. Adopt permitted uses for the RMF-12 Zoning District in Section 9-2.020 of Title 9 (Planning and Zoning) as shown in Exhibit A to Resolution No. __________. 3. Establish the Medium Density Multi-Family Residential Zoning District (RMF-24) as shown in the Official Zoning Map of the City of Atascadero, included as Exhibit B to Resolution No. ____________, and amend the Official Zoning Map to reflect the same. 4. Adopt permitted uses for the RMF-24 Zoning District in Section 9-2.020 of Title 9 (Planning and Zoning) as shown in Exhibit A to Resolution No. ___________. Adopt Sections 9-2.02.080, 9-2.02.090, 9-2.02.100, 9-2.02.110, 9-2.02.120, 9-2.02.130, and 9- 2.02.140 of Title 9 (Planning and Zoning) to establish development standards for Multi-Family Zoning Districts as shown in in Exhibit A to Resolution No. __________. SECTION 7. This Resolution is effective immediately upon adoption. SECTION 8. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and shall cause a certified copy to be filed in the book of original resolutions. Page 20 of 49 -6- 13135-0001\3303609v1.doc BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this Resolution be delivered forthwith by the Planning Commission Secretary to the City Council of the City of Atascadero. On motion by Commissioner ____________________, and seconded by Commissioner _________________________, the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety by the following roll call vote: AYES: ( ) NOES: ( ) ABSENT: ( ) ABSTAINED: ( ) ADOPTED: CITY OF ATASCADERO, CA _________________________________________ Jason Anderson Planning Commission Chairperson ATTEST: ___________________________________ Phil Dunsmore Planning Commission Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: __________________________________ Taylor Foland, Assistant City Attorney Page 21 of 49 10/06/26 | Item F1 | Attachment 2 SEGMENT B SINGLE-FAMILY ZONING DISTRICTS 13135-0001\3303626v1.doc DRAFT PC RESOLUTION B A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING THE CITY COUNCIL AMEND TITLE 9 (PLANNING AND ZONING) TO ESTABLISH THE RESIDENTIAL SUBURBAN ZONING DISTRICT (RS), RESIDENTIAL SMALL LOT SINGLE FAMILY ZONING DISTRICT (RSL), AND RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY – 0.5 ACRES ZONING DISTRICT (RSF- 0.5), PERMITTED USES IN THE RS, RSL AND RSF-0.5 ZONING DISTRICTS, AND REGULATIONS FOR SINGLE-FAMILY ZONING DISTRICTS AND AMEND THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP AND TITLE 9 OF THE ATASCADERO MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY (SEGMENT B OF THE ZONING CODE UPDATE) TO REFLECT THE SAME FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE 2045 ATASCADERO GENERAL PLAN, INCLUDING THE PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED 6TH CYCLE HOUSING ELEMENT (2020-2028) AND MAKING A DETERMINATION THAT SEGMENT B OF THE ZONING CODE UPDATE IS WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE 2045 GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING CODE UPDATE AND NO FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW IS REQUIRED PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT WHEREAS, State Government Code Section 65860 requires all cities to have a consistent General Plan and Zoning regulations within 180 days of adoption of a General Plan; and WHEREAS, in July 2021, the City began the process of comprehensively updating the City's General Plan, and since this time City officials, City staff, and community members have been actively involved in the preparation of the 2045 General Plan; and WHEREAS, in conformance with State Law, the City elicited public input and involvement on the 2045 General Plan, provided opportunities for consultation to affected public agencies and California Native American tribes on the 2045 General Plan and drafted the 2045 General Plan to contain all mandatory elements of a general plan; and WHEREAS, on November 10, 2020 the City Council of the City of Atascadero (“City Council”) adopted Resolution No. 2020-079 adopting the 6th Cycle Housing Element (2020- 2028) and determined the action was exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility the Housing Element, which does not approve any development project, or other physical change to the environment and is a policy document setting forth the City’s policies to plan for City’s regional housing Page 22 of 49 -2- 13135-0001\3303626v1.doc needs allocation, may have a significant effect on the environment; and WHEREAS, on January 12, 2021, the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) certified the City of Atascadero’s 6th Cycle Housing Element (2020-2028); and WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 65860 requires the City’s zoning ordinances to be consistent with its General Plan such that the land uses authorized by the zoning ordinance are compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses, and programs specified in the General Plan; and WHEREAS, to implement the 2045 General Plan, including the 6th Cycle Housing Element (2020-2028) and to modernize the City’s zoning regulations and make other conforming edits, the City prepared changes to Title 9 (Zoning and Planning), including the zoning map (“Zoning Code Update”); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the requirements of CEQA, the City prepared an Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 2024070598) in coordination of the 2045 General Plan and Zoning Code Update. The Final Environmental Impact Report (“Final EIR”) analyzed impacts associated with the implementation of the 2045 General Plan and corresponding Zoning Code Update, fully describes the project, existing conditions within the City of Atascadero, analyzes potential environmental impacts of implementing the project, identifies all feasible mitigation measures to minimize significant impacts to a less than significant level, and identifies those impacts that remain significant and unavoidable; and WHEREAS, on September 22, 2026 after a duly noticed public hearing, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2026-063 certifying the Final EIR for the 2045 General Plan and Zoning Code Update (SCH # 2024070598) and adopting the CEQA Findings of Fact, Statement of Overriding Considerations and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (“MMRP”) and Resolution No. 2026-064 adopting the 2045 General Plan; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code Sections 65853 – 65855, the Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing and provide recommendations to the City Council on such zoning code amendments; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on October 6, 2026 at which time all interested persons were given the opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 18706 of Title 2, Division 6, Chapter 7, Article 1 of the California Code of Regulations, due to conflicts of interest, the Planning Commission segmented decisions regarding the following (collectively referred to as the “Zoning Actions”):  Creation of the Low Density Multi-Family Residential Zoning District (RMF-12) and Medium Density Multi-Family Residential Zoning District (RMF-24) and corresponding amendment to the Zoning Map to reflect the same, permitted uses for the RMF-12 and RMF-24 Zones, and regulations for Multi-Family Zoning Districts Page 23 of 49 -3- 13135-0001\3303626v1.doc (collectively, “Segment A”);  Creation of the Residential Suburban Zoning District (RS), Residential Small Lot Single Family Zoning District (RSL), and Residential Single Family – 0.5 Acres Zoning District (RSF-0.5) and corresponding amendment to the Zoning Map to reflect the same, permitted uses and regulations for the RS, RSL, and RSF-0.5 Zoning Districts, and regulations for Single Family Zoning Districts (collectively, “Segment B”);  Creation of the Downtown Commercial Zoning District (DC), Commercial Zoning District (C), and Industrial Zoning District (I) and corresponding amendment to the Zoning Map to reflect the same, permitted uses for the DC, C and I Zoning Districts, and regulations for Commercial and Industrial Zoning Districts (collectively, “Segment C”); and  Creation of the Mixed Use – 3 (MU-3) Zoning District and corresponding amendment to the Zoning Map to reflect the same, permitted uses for the MU-3 Zoning District, and regulations for Mixed Use Zoning Districts (collectively, “Segment D”). WHEREAS, Chairperson Anderson, Vice Chairperson Pennachio, and Commissioners Jones, O’Malley and Ferrell had conflicts of interest with Segment A; Chairperson Anderson, Vice Chairperson Pennachio and Commissioner Jones had conflicts of interest with Segment B; Chairperson Anderson, Vice Chairperson Pennachio and Commissioner O’Malley had conflicts of interest with Segment C; and Chairperson Anderson and Commissioner Jones had conflicts of interest with Segment D; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Segments A through D in accordance with the rules of segmentation and the Rule of Necessity as needed to reach a quorum; and, WHEREAS, for each Segment, the participating Commissioners considered the Zoning Actions and found the proposed Zoning Actions (i) are consistent with the General Plan policies and all other applicable ordinances and policies of the City and (ii) will provide for the orderly and efficient use of lands; and WHEREAS, when all conflicts of interest amongst the Commissioners were resolved, all seven members of the Planning Commission considered the remainder of the Zoning Code Update; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Code Update was reviewed for compliance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines (Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3 of the California Code of Regulations). The Zoning Code Update relies on and is consistent with the environmental analysis conducted as part of the 2045 General Plan process for the General Plan and Zoning Code Update. The Zoning Code Update implements the intent, policies and goals of the 2045 General Plan. In addition, the Zoning Code Update was identified as part of the Project Description in the Final EIR. The impacts associated with the proposed changes are consistent with the scope of those previously analyzed by the certified Final EIR for the 2045 General Plan and Zoning Code Update. Page 24 of 49 -4- 13135-0001\3303626v1.doc Therefore, the proposed Zoning Code Update is within the scope of the Final EIR and no further environmental analysis is required pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15168. NOW THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Recitals set forth above are true and correct and are adopted as findings in support of this Resolution. SECTION 2. The findings made in this Resolution are based upon the information and evidence set forth in the Recitals to this Resolution, the Zoning Code Update (attached as Exhibit A and Exhibit B to Resolution No. ___________), the Final EIR for the 2045 General Plan and Zoning Code Update (as certified by the City Council by adopted Resolution No. 2026-063 and a copy of which is on file with the City), the 2045 General Plan (as adopted by the City Council by adopted Resolution No. 2026-064 and a copy of which is on file with the City), and upon other substantial evidence that has been presented at the hearing and in the record of this proceeding. SECTION 3. The Planning Commission hereby finds, in the exercise of its independent judgment and based on substantial evidence in the whole of the record, and recommends that the City Council find, that this Segment B of the Zoning Code Update is consistent with, and within the scope of, the environmental analysis conducted as part of the 2045 General Plan and Zoning Code Update Final EIR and that no further environmental review is required, including pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166, or CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 or 15168, because: (i) No information has been presented to the City to demonstrate that any substantial changes have occurred with respect to the Project involving new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (ii) No information has been presented to the City to demonstrate that any substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken involving new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and (iii) No information has been presented to the City to demonstrate that there is any new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the Final EIR was certified as complete showing that the Project will have any significant or more severe effects than those discussed in the Final EIR, or that additional mitigation measures or alternatives would substantially reduce any significant effects on the environment disclosed in the Final EIR. SECTION 4. The Zoning Code Update, 2045 General Plan, the Final EIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, Findings of Fact, and Statement of Overriding Considerations regarding the Final EIR for the 2045 General Plan and Zoning Code Update, agenda reports, technical studies, appendices, plans, specifications and other documents and materials that constitute the record of proceedings upon which this Resolution is based on, are on-file for public examination during normal business hours at the City of Atascadero City Hall, 6500 Palma Avenue, Atascadero, California 93422 and available on the City’s website at www.atascadero.org. Each of these documents is incorporated herein by reference in connection with making the findings and approvals taken by the Planning Commission in this Resolution. Page 25 of 49 -5- 13135-0001\3303626v1.doc SECTION 5. This Segment B of the Zoning Code Update implements the goals and policies of the 2045 General Plan and is found consistent with the requirements of the General Plan. This Segment B of the Zoning Code Update will provide for the orderly and efficient use of lands. SECTION 6. In accordance with Section 18706 of Title 2, Division 6, Chapter 7, Article 1 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission segmented the decisions regarding the Zoning Actions. Due to conflict of interests, Chairperson Anderson, Vice Chairperson Pennachio, and Commissioners Jones, O’Malley and Ferrell recused themselves until their conflicts of interest were resolved. The Planning Commission considered Segment A first. Pursuant to the Rule of Necessity, the Planning Commission randomly selected Commissioners ____ and _____ to rejoin the Planning Commission for consideration of Segment A. After consideration of Segment A, Commissioner Ferrell’s conflicts of interest were resolved and he rejoined the dais. Thereafter, the Planning Commission considered Segments B, C and D according to a randomly selected order in accordance with the rules of segmentation and the Rule of Necessity. Based on all the documents and other evidence presented in connection with this proceeding and in this Resolution, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that, as part of the comprehensive repeal and replace of Title 9 (Zoning and Planning) and the Official Zoning Map of the City of Atascadero, the City Council approve Segment B as follows: 1. Establish the Residential Suburban Zoning District (RS) as shown in the Official Zoning Map of the City of Atascadero, included as Exhibit B to Resolution No. ____________, and amend the Official Zoning Map to reflect the same. 2. Adopt permitted uses for the RS Zoning District in Section 9-2.02.020 of Title 9 (Planning and Zoning) as shown in Exhibit A to Resolution No. ___________. 3. Establish the Residential Small Lot Single Family Zoning District (RSL) as shown in the Official Zoning Map of the City of Atascadero, included as Exhibit B to Resolution No. ____________, and amend the Official Zoning Map to reflect the same. 4. Adopt permitted uses for the RSL Zoning District in Section 9-2.02.020 of Title 9 (Planning and Zoning) as shown in Exhibit A to Resolution No. ____________. 5. Establish the Residential Single-Family – 0.5 Acres Zoning District (RSF-0.5) as shown in the Official Zoning Map of the City of Atascadero, included as Exhibit B to Resolution No. ____________, and amend the Official Zoning Map to reflect the same. 6. Adopt permitted uses for the RSF-0.5 Zoning District in Section 9.2-02.020 of Title 9 (Planning and Zoning) as shown in Exhibit A to Resolution No. ____________. 7. Adopt Sections 9-2.02.030, 9-2.02.050, 9-2.02.060 and 9-2.02.070 of Title 9 (Planning and Zoning) to establish development standards for Single-Family Zoning Districts and specific regulations for the RS and RSL Zoning Districts as shown in Exhibit A to Resolution No. ______________. Page 26 of 49 -6- 13135-0001\3303626v1.doc SECTION 7. This Resolution is effective immediately upon adoption. SECTION 8. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and shall cause a certified copy to be filed in the book of original resolutions. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this Resolution be delivered forthwith by the Planning Commission Secretary to the City Council of the City of Atascadero. On motion by Commissioner ____________________, and seconded by Commissioner _________________________, the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety by the following roll call vote: AYES: ( ) NOES: ( ) ABSENT: ( ) ABSTAINED: ( ) ADOPTED: CITY OF ATASCADERO, CA _________________________________________ Jason Anderson Planning Commission Chairperson ATTEST: ___________________________________ Phil Dunsmore Planning Commission Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: Page 27 of 49 -7- 13135-0001\3303626v1.doc __________________________________ Taylor Foland, Assistant City Attorney Page 28 of 49 10/06/26 | Item F1 | Attachment 3 SEGMENT C COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS 13135-0001\3303628v1.doc DRAFT PC RESOLUTION C A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING THE CITY COUNCIL AMEND TITLE 9 (PLANNING AND ZONING) TO ESTABLISH THE DOWNTOWN COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT (DC), COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT (C), AND THE INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICT (I), PERMITTED USES IN COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS, AND REGULATIONS FOR COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS AND AMEND THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP AND TITLE 9 OF THE ATASCADERO MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY (SEGMENT C OF THE ZONING CODE UPDATE) TO REFLECT THE SAME FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE 2045 ATASCADERO GENERAL PLAN, INCLUDING THE PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED 6TH CYCLE HOUSING ELEMENT (2020-2028) AND MAKING A DETERMINATION THAT SEGMENT C OF THE ZONING CODE UPDATE IS WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE 2045 GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING CODE UPDATE AND NO FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW IS REQUIRED PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT WHEREAS, State Government Code Section 65860 requires all cities to have a consistent General Plan and Zoning regulations within 180 days of adoption of a General Plan; and WHEREAS, in July 2021, the City began the process of comprehensively updating the City's General Plan, and since this time City officials, City staff, and community members have been actively involved in the preparation of the 2045 General Plan; and WHEREAS, in conformance with State Law, the City elicited public input and involvement on the 2045 General Plan, provided opportunities for consultation to affected public agencies and California Native American tribes on the 2045 General Plan, and drafted the 2045 General Plan to contain all mandatory elements of a general plan; and WHEREAS, on November 10, 2020 the City Council of the City of Atascadero (“City Council”) adopted Resolution No. 2020-079 adopting the 6th Cycle Housing Element (2020- 2028) and determined the action was exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility the Housing Element, which does not approve any development project, or other physical change to the environment and is a policy document setting forth the City’s policies to plan for City’s regional housing Page 29 of 49 -2- 13135-0001\3303628v1.doc needs allocation, may have a significant effect on the environment; and WHEREAS, on January 12, 2021, the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) certified the City of Atascadero’s 6th Cycle Housing Element (2020-2028); and WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 65860 requires the City’s zoning ordinances to be consistent with its General Plan such that the land uses authorized by the zoning ordinance are compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses, and programs specified in the General Plan; and WHEREAS, to implement the 2045 General Plan, including the 6th Cycle Housing Element (2020-2028) and to modernize the City’s zoning regulations and make other conforming edits, the City prepared changes to Title 9 (Zoning and Planning), including the zoning map (“Zoning Code Update”); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the requirements of CEQA, the City prepared an Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 2024070598) in coordination of the 2045 General Plan and Zoning Code Update. The Final Environmental Impact Report (“Final EIR”) analyzed impacts associated with the implementation of the 2045 General Plan and corresponding Zoning Code Update, fully describes the project, existing conditions within the City of Atascadero, analyzes potential environmental impacts of implementing the project, identifies all feasible mitigation measures to minimize significant impacts to a less than significant level, and identifies those impacts that remain significant and unavoidable; and WHEREAS, on September 22, 2026 after a duly noticed public hearing, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2026-063 certifying the Final EIR for the 2045 General Plan and Zoning Code Update (SCH # 2024070598) and adopting the CEQA Findings of Fact, Statement of Overriding Considerations and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (“MMRP”) and Resolution No. 2026-064 adopting the 2045 General Plan; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code Sections 65853 – 65855, the Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing and provide recommendations to the City Council on such zoning code amendments; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on October 6, 2026 at which time all interested persons were given the opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 18706 of Title 2, Division 6, Chapter 7, Article 1 of the California Code of Regulations, due to conflicts of interest, the Planning Commission segmented decisions regarding the following (collectively referred to as the “Zoning Actions”):  Creation of the Low Density Multi-Family Residential Zoning District (RMF-12) and Medium Density Multi-Family Residential Zoning District (RMF-24) and corresponding amendment to the Zoning Map to reflect the same, permitted uses for the RMF-12 and RMF-24 Zones, and regulations for Multi-Family Zoning Districts Page 30 of 49 -3- 13135-0001\3303628v1.doc (collectively, “Segment A”);  Creation of the Residential Suburban Zoning District (RS), Residential Small Lot Single Family Zoning District (RSL), and Residential Single Family – 0.5 Acres Zoning District (RSF-0.5) and corresponding amendment to the Zoning Map to reflect the same, permitted uses and regulations for the RS, RSL, and RSF-0.5 Zoning Districts, and regulations for Single Family Zoning Districts (collectively, “Segment B”);  Creation of the Downtown Commercial Zoning District (DC), Commercial Zoning District (C), and Industrial Zoning District (I) and corresponding amendment to the Zoning Map to reflect the same, permitted uses for the DC, C and I Zoning Districts, and regulations for Commercial and Industrial Zoning Districts (collectively, “Segment C”); and  Creation of the Mixed Use – 3 (MU-3) Zoning District and corresponding amendment to the Zoning Map to reflect the same, permitted uses for the MU-3 Zoning District, and regulations for Mixed Use Zoning Districts (collectively, “Segment D”). WHEREAS, Chairperson Anderson, Vice Chairperson Pennachio, and Commissioners Jones, O’Malley and Ferrell had conflicts of interest with Segment A; Chairperson Anderson, Vice Chairperson Pennachio and Commissioner Jones had conflicts of interest with Segment B; Chairperson Anderson, Vice Chairperson Pennachio and Commissioner O’Malley had conflicts of interest with Segment C; and Chairperson Anderson and Commissioner Jones had conflicts of interest with Segment D; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Segments A through D in accordance with the rules of segmentation and the Rule of Necessity as needed to reach a quorum; and, WHEREAS, for each Segment, the participating Commissioners considered the Zoning Actions and found the proposed Zoning Actions (i) are consistent with the General Plan policies and all other applicable ordinances and policies of the City and (ii) will provide for the orderly and efficient use of lands; and WHEREAS, when all conflicts of interest amongst the Commissioners were resolved, all seven members of the Planning Commission considered the remainder of the Zoning Code Update; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Code Update was reviewed for compliance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines (Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3 of the California Code of Regulations). The Zoning Code Update relies on and is consistent with the environmental analysis conducted as part of the 2045 General Plan process for the General Plan and Zoning Code Update. The Zoning Code Update implements the intent, policies and goals of the 2045 General Plan. In addition, the Zoning Code Update was identified as part of the Project Description in the Final EIR. The impacts associated with the proposed changes are consistent with the scope of those previously analyzed by the certified Final EIR for the 2045 General Plan and Zoning Code Update. Page 31 of 49 -4- 13135-0001\3303628v1.doc Therefore, the proposed Zoning Code Update is within the scope of the Final EIR and no further environmental analysis is required pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15168. NOW THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Recitals set forth above are true and correct and are adopted as findings in support of this Resolution. SECTION 2. The findings made in this Resolution are based upon the information and evidence set forth in the Recitals to this Resolution, the Zoning Code Update (attached as Exhibit A and Exhibit B to Resolution No. ____________), the Final EIR for the 2045 General Plan and Zoning Code Update (as certified by the City Council by adopted Resolution No. 2026-063 and a copy of which is on file with the City), the 2045 General Plan (as adopted by the City Council by adopted Resolution No. 2026-064 and a copy of which is on file with the City), and upon other substantial evidence that has been presented at the hearing and in the record of this proceeding. SECTION 3. The Planning Commission hereby finds, in the exercise of its independent judgment and based on substantial evidence in the whole of the record, and recommends that the City Council find, that this Segment C of the Zoning Code Update is consistent with, and within the scope of, the environmental analysis conducted as part of the 2045 General Plan and Zoning Code Update Final EIR and that no further environmental review is required, including pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166, or CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 or 15168, because: (i) No information has been presented to the City to demonstrate that any substantial changes have occurred with respect to the Project involving new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (ii) No information has been presented to the City to demonstrate that any substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken involving new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and (iii) No information has been presented to the City to demonstrate that there is any new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the Final EIR was certified as complete showing that the Project will have any significant or more severe effects than those discussed in the Final EIR, or that additional mitigation measures or alternatives would substantially reduce any significant effects on the environment disclosed in the Final EIR. SECTION 4. The Zoning Code Update, 2045 General Plan, the Final EIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, Findings of Fact, and Statement of Overriding Considerations regarding the Final EIR for the 2045 General Plan and Zoning Code Update, agenda reports, technical studies, appendices, plans, specifications and other documents and materials that constitute the record of proceedings upon which this Resolution is based on, are on-file for public examination during normal business hours at the City of Atascadero City Hall, 6500 Palma Avenue, Atascadero, California 93422 and available on the City’s website at www.atascadero.org. Each of these documents is incorporated herein by reference in connection with making the findings and approvals taken by the Planning Commission in this Resolution. Page 32 of 49 -5- 13135-0001\3303628v1.doc SECTION 5. This Segment C of the Zoning Code Update implements the goals and policies of the 2045 General Plan and is found consistent with the requirements of the General Plan. This Segment C of the Zoning Code Update will provide for the orderly and efficient use of lands. SECTION 6. In accordance with Section 18706 of Title 2, Division 6, Chapter 7, Article 1 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission segmented the decisions regarding the Zoning Actions. Due to conflict of interests, Chairperson Anderson, Vice Chairperson Pennachio, and Commissioners Jones, O’Malley and Ferrell recused themselves until their conflicts of interest were resolved. The Planning Commission considered Segment A first. Pursuant to the Rule of Necessity, the Planning Commission randomly selected Commissioners ____ and _____ to rejoin the Planning Commission for consideration of Segment A. Thereafter, the Planning Commission considered Segments B, C and D according to a randomly selected order in accordance with the rules of segmentation and the Rule of Necessity. Based on all the documents and other evidence presented in connection with this proceeding and in this Resolution, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that, as part of the comprehensive repeal and replace of Title 9 (Zoning and Planning) and the Official Zoning Map of the City of Atascadero, the City Council approve Segment C as follows: 1. Establish the Downtown Commercial Zoning District (DC) as shown in the Official Zoning Map of the City of Atascadero, included as Exhibit B to Draft Resolution No. _____________, and amend the Official Zoning Map to reflect the same. 2. Establish the Commercial Zoning District (C) as shown in the Official Zoning Map of the City of Atascadero, included as Exhibit B to Draft Resolution No. ______________), and amend the Official Zoning Map to reflect the same. 3. Establish the Industrial Zoning District (I) as shown in the Official Zoning Map of the City of Atascadero, included as Exhibit B to Draft Resolution No. ____________), and amend the Official Zoning Map to reflect the same. 4. Adopt Article 9-2.04 of Title 9 (Planning and Zoning) to establish permitted uses and development standards for Commercial and Industrial Zoning Districts as shown in Exhibit A to Resolution No. ________________. SECTION 7. This Resolution is effective immediately upon adoption. SECTION 8. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and shall cause a certified copy to be filed in the book of original resolutions. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this Resolution be delivered forthwith by the Planning Commission Secretary to the City Council of the City of Atascadero. On motion by Commissioner ____________________, and seconded by Commissioner _________________________, the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety by the following roll call vote: Page 33 of 49 -6- 13135-0001\3303628v1.doc AYES: ( ) NOES: ( ) ABSENT: ( ) ABSTAINED: ( ) ADOPTED: CITY OF ATASCADERO, CA _________________________________________ Jason Anderson Planning Commission Chairperson ATTEST: ___________________________________ Phil Dunsmore Planning Commission Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: __________________________________ Taylor Foland, Assistant City Attorney Page 34 of 49 10/06/26 | Item F1 | Attachment 4 SEGMENT D MIXED USE ZONING DISTRICTS 13135-0001\3303631v1.doc DRAFT PC RESOLUTION D A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING THE CITY COUNCIL AMEND TITLE 9 (PLANNING AND ZONING) TO ESTABLISH THE MIXED USE – 3 ZONING DISTRICT (MU-3), PERMITTED USES IN THE MU-3 ZONING DISTRICT, AND REGULATIONS FOR MIXED USE ZONING DISTRICTS AND AMEND THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP AND TITLE 9 OF THE ATASCADERO MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY (SEGMENT D OF ZONING CODE UPDATE) TO REFLECT THE SAME FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE 2045 ATASCADERO GENERAL PLAN, INCLUDING THE PERVIOUSLY ADOPTED 6TH CYCLE HOUSING ELEMENT (2020-2028) AND MAKING A DETERMINATION THAT SEGMENT D OF THE ZONING CODE UPDATE IS WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE 2045 GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING CODE UPDATE AND NO FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW IS REQUIRED PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT WHEREAS, State Government Code Section 65860 requires all cities to have a consistent General Plan and Zoning regulations within 180 days of adoption of a General Plan; and WHEREAS, in July 2021, the City began the process of comprehensively updating the City's General Plan, and since this time City officials, City staff, and community members have been actively involved in the preparation of the 2045 General Plan; and WHEREAS, in conformance with State Law, the City elicited public input and involvement on the 2045 General Plan, provided opportunities for consultation to affected public agencies and California Native American tribes on the 2045 General Plan, and drafted the 2045 General Plan to contain all mandatory elements of a general plan; and WHEREAS, on November 10, 2020 the City Council of the City of Atascadero (“City Council”) adopted Resolution No. 2020-079 adopting the 6th Cycle Housing Element (2020- 2028) and determined the action was exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility the Housing Element, which does not approve any development project, or other physical change to the environment and is a policy document setting forth the City’s policies to plan for City’s regional housing needs allocation, may have a significant effect on the environment; and WHEREAS, on January 12, 2021, the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) certified the City of Atascadero’s 6th Cycle Housing Element Page 35 of 49 -2- 13135-0001\3303631v1.doc (2020-2028); and WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 65860 requires the City’s zoning ordinances to be consistent with its General Plan such that the land uses authorized by the zoning ordinance are compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses, and programs specified in the General Plan; and WHEREAS, to implement the 2045 General Plan, including the 6th Cycle Housing Element (2020-2028) and to modernize the City’s zoning regulations and make other conforming edits, the City prepared changes to Title 9 (Zoning and Planning), including the zoning map (“Zoning Code Update”); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the requirements of CEQA, the City prepared an Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 2024070598) in coordination of the 2045 General Plan and Zoning Code Update. The Final Environmental Impact Report (“Final EIR”) analyzed impacts associated with the implementation of the 2045 General Plan and corresponding Zoning Code Update, fully describes the project, existing conditions within the City of Atascadero, analyzes potential environmental impacts of implementing the project, identifies all feasible mitigation measures to minimize significant impacts to a less than significant level, and identifies those impacts that remain significant and unavoidable; and WHEREAS, on September 22, 2026 after a duly noticed public hearing, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2026-063 certifying the Final EIR for the 2045 General Plan and Zoning Code Update (SCH # 2024070598) and adopting the CEQA Findings of Fact, Statement of Overriding Considerations and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (“MMRP”) and Resolution No. 2026-064 adopting the 2045 General Plan; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code Sections 65853 – 65855, the Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing and provide recommendations to the City Council on such zoning code amendments; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on October 6, 2026 at which time all interested persons were given the opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 18706 of Title 2, Division 6, Chapter 7, Article 1 of the California Code of Regulations, due to conflicts of interest, the Planning Commission segmented decisions regarding the following (collectively referred to as the “Zoning Actions”):  Creation of the Low Density Multi-Family Residential Zoning District (RMF-12) and Medium Density Multi-Family Residential Zoning District (RMF-24) and corresponding amendment to the Zoning Map to reflect the same, permitted uses for the RMF-12 and RMF-24 Zones, and regulations for Multi-Family Zoning Districts (collectively, “Segment A”);  Creation of the Residential Suburban Zoning District (RS), Residential Small Lot Single Family Zoning District (RSL), and Residential Single Family – 0.5 Acres Page 36 of 49 -3- 13135-0001\3303631v1.doc Zoning District (RSF-0.5) and corresponding amendment to the Zoning Map to reflect the same, permitted uses and regulations for the RS, RSL, and RSF-0.5 Zoning Districts, and regulations for Single Family Zoning Districts (collectively, “Segment B”);  Creation of the Downtown Commercial Zoning District (DC), Commercial Zoning District (C), and Industrial Zoning District (I) and corresponding amendment to the Zoning Map to reflect the same, permitted uses for the DC, C and I Zoning Districts, and regulations for Commercial and Industrial Zoning Districts (collectively, “Segment C”); and  Creation of the Mixed Use – 3 (MU-3) Zoning District and corresponding amendment to the Zoning Map to reflect the same, permitted uses for the MU-3 Zoning District, and regulations for Mixed Use Zoning Districts (collectively, “Segment D”). WHEREAS, Chairperson Anderson, Vice Chairperson Pennachio, and Commissioners Jones, O’Malley and Ferrell had conflicts of interest with Segment A; Chairperson Anderson, Vice Chairperson Pennachio and Commissioner Jones had conflicts of interest with Segment B; Chairperson Anderson, Vice Chairperson Pennachio and Commissioner O’Malley had conflicts of interest with Segment C; and Chairperson Anderson and Commissioner Jones had conflicts of interest with Segment D; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Segments A through D in accordance with the rules of segmentation and the Rule of Necessity as needed to reach a quorum; and, WHEREAS, for each Segment, the participating Commissioners considered the Zoning Actions and found the proposed Zoning Actions (i) are consistent with the General Plan policies and all other applicable ordinances and policies of the City and (ii) will provide for the orderly and efficient use of lands; and WHEREAS, when all conflicts of interest amongst the Commissioners were resolved, all seven members of the Planning Commission considered the remainder of the Zoning Code Update; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Code Update was reviewed for compliance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines (Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3 of the California Code of Regulations). The Zoning Code Update relies on and is consistent with the environmental analysis conducted as part of the 2045 General Plan process for the General Plan and Zoning Code Update. The Zoning Code Update implements the intent, policies and goals of the 2045 General Plan. In addition, the Zoning Code Update was identified as part of the Project Description in the Final EIR. The impacts associated with the proposed changes are consistent with the scope of those previously analyzed by the certified Final EIR for the 2045 General Plan and Zoning Code Update. Therefore, the proposed Zoning Code Update is within the scope of the Final EIR and no further environmental analysis is required pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15168. NOW THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF Page 37 of 49 -4- 13135-0001\3303631v1.doc ATASCADERO DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Recitals set forth above are true and correct and are adopted as findings in support of this Resolution. SECTION 2. The findings made in this Resolution are based upon the information and evidence set forth in the Recitals to this Resolution, the Zoning Code Update (attached as Exhibit A and Exhibit B to Resolution No. ______________), the Final EIR for the 2045 General Plan and Zoning Code Update (as certified by the City Council by adopted Resolution No. 2026-063 and a copy of which is on file with the City), the 2045 General Plan (as adopted by the City Council by adopted Resolution No. 2026-064 and a copy of which is on file with the City), and upon other substantial evidence that has been presented at the hearing and in the record of this proceeding. SECTION 3. The Planning Commission hereby finds, in the exercise of its independent judgment and based on substantial evidence in the whole of the record, and recommends that the City Council find, that this Segment D of the Zoning Code Update is consistent with, and within the scope of, the environmental analysis conducted as part of the 2045 General Plan and Zoning Code Update Final EIR and that no further environmental review is required, including pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166, or CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 or 15168, because: (i) No information has been presented to the City to demonstrate that any substantial changes have occurred with respect to the Project involving new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (ii) No information has been presented to the City to demonstrate that any substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken involving new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and (iii) No information has been presented to the City to demonstrate that there is any new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the Final EIR was certified as complete showing that the Project will have any significant or more severe effects than those discussed in the Final EIR, or that additional mitigation measures or alternatives would substantially reduce any significant effects on the environment disclosed in the Final EIR. SECTION 4. The Zoning Code Update, 2045 General Plan, the Final EIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, Findings of Fact, and Statement of Overriding Considerations regarding the Final EIR for the 2045 General Plan and Zoning Code Update, agenda reports, technical studies, appendices, plans, specifications and other documents and materials that constitute the record of proceedings upon which this Resolution is based on, are on-file for public examination during normal business hours at the City of Atascadero City Hall, 6500 Palma Avenue, Atascadero, California 93422 and available on the City’s website at www.atascadero.org. Each of these documents is incorporated herein by reference in connection with making the findings and approvals taken by the Planning Commission in this Resolution. SECTION 5. This Segment D of the Zoning Code Update implements the goals and policies of the 2045 General Plan and is found consistent with the requirements of the General Plan. This Segment D of the Zoning Code Update will provide for the orderly and efficient use of lands. Page 38 of 49 -5- 13135-0001\3303631v1.doc SECTION 6. In accordance with Section 18706 of Title 2, Division 6, Chapter 7, Article 1 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission segmented the decisions regarding the Zoning Actions. Due to conflict of interests, Chairperson Anderson, Vice Chairperson Pennachio, and Commissioners Jones, O’Malley and Ferrell recused themselves until their conflicts of interest were resolved. The Planning Commission considered Segment A first. Pursuant to the Rule of Necessity, the Planning Commission randomly selected Commissioners ____ and _____ to rejoin the Planning Commission for consideration of Segment A. Thereafter, the Planning Commission considered Segments B, C and D according to a randomly selected order in accordance with the rules of segmentation and the Rule of Necessity. Based on all the documents and other evidence presented in connection with this proceeding and in this Resolution, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that, as part of the comprehensive repeal and replace of Title 9 (Zoning and Planning) and the Official Zoning Map of the City of Atascadero, the City Council approve Segment D as follows: 1. Establish the Mixed Use – 3 Zoning District (MU-3) as shown in the Official Zoning Map of the City of Atascadero, included as Exhibit B to Resolution No. _______________, and amend the Official Zoning Map to reflect the same. 2. Adopt permitted uses for the MU-3 Zoning District in Section 9-2.06.020 of Title 9 (Planning and Zoning) as shown in Exhibit A to Resolution No. _______________. 3. Adopt Sections 9-2.06.030, 9-2.06.050, 9-2.06.060, 9-2.06.080, 9-2.06.090, 9-2.06.100, 9-2.06.110, and 9-2.06.130 of Title 9 (Planning and Zoning) to establish certain development standards for Mixed Use and Downtown Zoning Districts as shown in Exhibit A to Resolution No. _____________. SECTION 7. This Resolution is effective immediately upon adoption. SECTION 8. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and shall cause a certified copy to be filed in the book of original resolutions. Page 39 of 49 -6- 13135-0001\3303631v1.doc BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this Resolution be delivered forthwith by the Planning Commission Secretary to the City Council of the City of Atascadero. On motion by Commissioner ____________________, and seconded by Commissioner _________________________, the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety by the following roll call vote: AYES: ( ) NOES: ( ) ABSENT: ( ) ABSTAINED: ( ) ADOPTED: CITY OF ATASCADERO, CA _________________________________________ Jason Anderson Planning Commission Chairperson ATTEST: ___________________________________ Phil Dunsmore Planning Commission Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: __________________________________ Taylor Foland, Assistant City Attorney Page 40 of 49 10/06/26 | Item F1 | Attachment 5 REMAINING PORTIONS OF ZONING CODE UPDATE DRAFT PC RESOLUTION E A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING THE CITY COUNCIL REPEAL AND REPLACE TITLE 9 (ZONING AND PLANNING), INCLUDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY (ZONING CODE UPDATE), FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE 2045 ATASCADERO GENERAL PLAN AND THE PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED 6TH CYCLE HOUSING ELEMENT (2020-2028), AND TO MODERNIZE THE CITY’S ZONING REGULATIONS AND TO MAKE OTHER CONFORMING EDITS, AND MAKING A DETERMINATION THAT THE ZONING CODE UPDATE IS WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE 2045 GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING CODE UPDATE AND NO FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW IS REQUIRED PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT WHEREAS, State Government Code Section 65860 requires all cities to have a consistent General Plan and Zoning regulations within 180 days of adoption of a General Plan; and WHEREAS, in July 2021, the City began the process of comprehensively updating the City's General Plan, and since this time City officials, City staff, and community members have been actively involved in the preparation of the 2045 General Plan; and WHEREAS, in conformance with State Law, the City elicited public input and involvement on the 2045 General Plan, provided opportunities for consultation to affected public agencies and California Native American tribes on the 2045 General Plan, and drafted the 2045 General Plan to contain all mandatory elements of a general plan; and WHEREAS, on November 10, 2020 the City Council of the City of Atascadero (“City Council”) adopted Resolution No. 2020-079 adopting the 6th Cycle Housing Element (2020-2028) and determined the action was exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility the Housing Element, which does not approve any development project, or other physical change to the environment and is a policy document setting forth the City’s policies to plan for City’s regional housing needs allocation, may have a significant effect on the environment; and WHEREAS, on January 12, 2021, the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) certified the City of Atascadero’s 6th Cycle Housing Element (2020-2028); and WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 65860 requires the City’s zoning ordinances to be consistent with its General Plan such that the land uses authorized by the zoning ordinance are compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses, and programs specified in the General Plan; and Page 41 of 49 WHEREAS, to implement the 2045 General Plan, including the 6th Cycle Housing Element (2020-2028) and to modernize the City’s zoning regulations and make other conforming edits, the City prepared changes to Title 9 (Zoning and Planning), including the zoning map (“Zoning Code Update”); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the requirements of CEQA, the City prepared an Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 2024070598) in coordination of the 2045 General Plan and Zoning Code Update. The Final Environmental Impact Report (“Final EIR”) analyzed impacts associated with the implementation of the 2045 General Plan and corresponding Zoning Code Update, fully describes the project, existing conditions within the City of Atascadero, analyzes potential environmental impacts of implementing the project, identifies all feasible mitigation measures to minimize significant impacts to a less than significant level, and identifies those impacts that remain significant and unavoidable; and WHEREAS, on September 22, 2026, after a duly noticed public hearing, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2026-063 certifying the Final EIR for the 2045 General Plan and Zoning Code Update (SCH # 2024070598) and adopting the CEQA Findings of Fact, Statement of Overriding Considerations and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (“MMRP”) and Resolution No. 2026- 064 adopting the 2045 General Plan; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code Sections 65853 – 65855, the Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing and provide recommendations to the City Council on such zoning code amendments; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on October 6, 2026 at which time all interested persons were given the opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 18706 of Title 2, Division 6, Chapter 7, Article 1 of the California Code of Regulations, due to conflicts of interest, the Planning Commission segmented decisions regarding the following (collectively referred to as the “Zoning Actions”):  Creation of the Low Density Multi-Family Residential Zoning District (RMF-12) and Medium Density Multi-Family Residential Zoning District (RMF-24) and corresponding amendment to the Zoning Map to reflect the same, permitted uses for the RMF-12 and RMF- 24 Zones, and regulations for Multi-Family Zoning Districts (collectively, “Segment A”);  Creation of the Residential Suburban Zoning District (RS), Residential Small Lot Single Family Zoning District (RSL), and Residential Single Family – 0.5 Acres Zoning District (RSF-0.5) and corresponding amendment to the Zoning Map to reflect the same, permitted uses and regulations for the RS, RSL, and RSF-0.5 Zoning Districts, and regulations for Single Family Zoning Districts (collectively, “Segment B”);  Creation of the Downtown Commercial Zoning District (DC), Commercial Zoning District (C), and Industrial Zoning District (I) and corresponding amendment to the Zoning Map to reflect the same, permitted uses for the DC, C and I Zoning Districts, and regulations for Commercial and Industrial Zoning Districts (collectively, “Segment C”); and  Creation of the Mixed Use – 3 (MU-3) Zoning District and corresponding amendment to the Zoning Map to reflect the same, permitted uses for the MU-3 Zoning District, and regulations for Mixed Use Zoning Districts (collectively, “Segment D”). WHEREAS, Chairperson Anderson, Vice Chairperson Pennachio, and Commissioners Jones, Page 42 of 49 O’Malley and Ferrell had conflicts of interest with Segment A; Chairperson Anderson, Vice Chairperson Pennachio and Commissioner Jones had conflicts of interest with Segment B; Chairperson Anderson, Vice Chairperson Pennachio and Commissioner O’Malley had conflicts of interest with Segment C; and Chairperson Anderson and Commissioner Jones had conflicts of interest with Segment D; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Segments A through D in accordance with the rules of segmentation and the Rule of Necessity as needed to reach a quorum; and, WHEREAS, for each Segment, the participating Commissioners considered the Zoning Actions and found the proposed Zoning Actions (i) are consistent with the General Plan policies and all other applicable ordinances and policies of the City and (ii) will provide for the orderly and efficient use of lands; and WHEREAS, when all conflicts of interest amongst the Commissioners were resolved, all seven members of the Planning Commission considered the remainder of the Zoning Code Update; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Code Update was reviewed for compliance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines (Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3 of the California Code of Regulations). The Zoning Code Update relies on and is consistent with the environmental analysis conducted as part of the 2045 General Plan process for the General Plan and Zoning Code Update. The Zoning Code Update implements the intent, policies and goals of the 2045 General Plan. In addition, the Zoning Code Update was identified as part of the Project Description in the Final EIR. The impacts associated with the proposed changes are consistent with the scope of those previously analyzed by the certified Final EIR for the 2045 General Plan and Zoning Code Update. Therefore, the proposed Zoning Code Update is within the scope of the Final EIR and no further environmental analysis is required pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15168. NOW THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Recitals set forth above are true and correct and are adopted as findings in support of this Resolution. SECTION 2. The findings made in this Resolution are based upon the information and evidence set forth in the Recitals to this Resolution, the Zoning Code Update (attached as Exhibit A and Exhibit B to this Resolution), the Final EIR for the 2045 General Plan and Zoning Code Update (as certified by the City Council by adopted Resolution No. 2026-063 and a copy of which is on file with the City), the 2045 General Plan (as adopted by the City Council by adopted Resolution No. 2026-064 and a copy of which is on file with the City), and upon other substantial evidence that has been presented at the hearing and in the record of this proceeding. SECTION 3. The Planning Commission hereby finds, in the exercise of its independent judgment and based on substantial evidence in the whole of the record, and recommends that the City Council find, that the Zoning Code Update is consistent with, and within the scope of, the environmental analysis conducted as part of the 2045 General Plan and Zoning Code Update Final EIR and that no further environmental review is required, including pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166, or CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 or 15168, because: (i) No information has been presented to the City to demonstrate that any substantial changes have occurred with respect to the Project involving new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (ii) No information has been presented to the City to demonstrate that any substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken Page 43 of 49 involving new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and (iii) No information has been presented to the City to demonstrate that there is any new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the Final EIR was certified as complete showing that the Project will have any significant or more severe effects than those discussed in the Final EIR, or that additional mitigation measures or alternatives would substantially reduce any significant effects on the environment disclosed in the Final EIR. SECTION 4. The Zoning Code Update, 2045 General Plan, the Final EIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, Findings of Fact, and Statement of Overriding Considerations regarding the Final EIR for the 2045 General Plan and Zoning Code Update, agenda reports, technical studies, appendices, plans, specifications and other documents and materials that constitute the record of proceedings upon which this Resolution is based on, are on-file for public examination during normal business hours at the City of Atascadero City Hall, 6500 Palma Avenue, Atascadero, California 93422 and available on the City’s website at www.atascadero.org. Each of these documents is incorporated herein by reference in connection with making the findings and approvals taken by the Planning Commission in this Resolution. SECTION 5. The Zoning Code Update implements the goals and policies of the 2045 General Plan and is found consistent with the requirements of the General Plan. The Zoning Code Update will provide for the orderly and efficient use of lands. SECTION 6. In accordance with Section 18706 of Title 2, Division 6, Chapter 7, Article 1 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission segmented decisions regarding certain Title 9 changes in which one or more Commissioners had a financial interest pursuant to the Political Reform Act (Government Code § 81000 et seq.). Based on the aforementioned findings and all the evidence in the record, and in accordance with the segmented decisions in Resolution Nos. ____________, ____________, ___________, and ____________ the Planning Commission hereby further recommends that the City Council of the City of Atascadero repeal and replace Title 9 (Zoning & Planning) of the Atascadero Municipal Code, including the Official Zoning Map of the City of Atascadero, as depicted in Exhibit B and not already recommended in segmented Resolutions Nos. __________, ____________, ___________, and ____________. SECTION 7. This Resolution is effective immediately upon adoption. SECTION 8. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and shall cause a certified copy to be filed in the book of original resolutions. Page 44 of 49 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this Resolution be delivered forthwith by the Planning Commission Secretary to the City Council of the City of Atascadero. On motion by Commissioner ____________________, and seconded by Commissioner _________________________, the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety by the following roll call vote: AYES: ( ) NOES: ( ) ABSENT: ( ) ABSTAINED: ( ) ADOPTED: CITY OF ATASCADERO, CA _________________________________________ Jason Anderson Planning Commission Chairperson ATTEST: ___________________________________ Phil Dunsmore Planning Commission Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: __________________________________ Taylor Foland, Assistant City Attorney Page 45 of 49 10/06/26 | Item F1 | Attachment 6 DRAFT PC RESOLUTION F RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING THE CITY COUNCIL AMEND TITLE 11, SUBDIVISIONS, TO INCLUDE LOT LINE ADJUSTMETN STANDARDS PREVIOUSLY INCLUDED IN TITLE 9, AND DETERMINING THIS ORDINANCE IS EXEMPT FROM REVIEW UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT COMPREHENSIVE ZONING CODE UPDATE (ZCH24-0040) WHEREAS, the City of Atascadero is considering Zoning Code Text Change Amendments to Title 9 of the Atascadero Municipal Code for consistency with newly enacted State laws and HCD comments regarding existing ordinance consistency with State law; and WHEREAS, Title 9 currently contains standards for Lot Line Adjustments that belong in Title 11: Subdivisions for clarity and consistency; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to enact these amendments to Chapter 5 of Title 11, Subdivisions, of the Municipal Code for consistency with the Subdivision Map Act and to maintain a clear and legible set of Subdivision Regulations that is easily interpreted by the public and staff; and WHEREAS, the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and public notice of environmental documents, as set forth in the State and local guidelines for implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) have been adhered to; and WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed Public Hearing upon the subject Planning and Zoning Text Amendment application was held by the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero at which hearing evidence, oral and documentary, was admitted on behalf of said Planning and Zoning Text Amendment; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, California, makes the following findings, determinations, and recommendations with respect to the proposed Municipal Code Text Amendment: SECTION 1. Recitals. The above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein as if set forth in full. SECTION 2. Public Hearing. The Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, in a regular session assembled on October 6, 2026, resolved to recommend that the City Council approve a Municipal Code Text Amendment to update Title 11, Chapter 5, Lot Line Adjustments, for consistency with State law and clarity relating to subdivision standards. SECTION 3. Findings. The Planning Commission finds as follows: Page 46 of 49 10/06/26 | Item F1 | Attachment 6 A. Findings for Subdivision Code Amendment: 1. FINDING: The amendments to Title 11 comply with all provisions of California Government Code Section 65913.2. FACT: The proposed code updates are consistent with the provisions and intentions of Government Code Section 65913.2 related to fair housing practices. 2. FINDING: The proposed amendments are not more restrictive than the regulations included in the Subdivision Map Act for subdivisions requiring a tentative and final map. FACT: The proposed amendments are consistent with newly adopted State law governing Lot Line Adjustments and do not add restrictions above and beyond those specifically allowed by State law to ensure public health, safety, and welfare. 3. FINDING: Per Subdivision Map Act Section 66412.3, the amendments consider the housing needs of the region while balancing against the public service needs of residents and the available fiscal and environmental resources. FACT: The proposed amendments relocate existing code standards applicable to Lot Line Adjustments from Title 9: Planning and Zoning to Title 11: Subdivisions for clarity and consistency. SECTION 4. CEQA. This ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Public resources Code Section 21000 et seq., because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the enactment of this Ordinance would have a significant effect on the environment (Pub. Resources Code § 21065; CEQA Guidelines §§ 15378(b)(4), 15061(b)(3). SECTION 5. Recommendation of Approval. The Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, in a regular session assembled on October 6, 2026, resolved to recommend that the City Council introduce, for first reading by title only, an Ordinance that would amend Title 11, Chapter 5 of the Atascadero Municipal Code consistent with EXHIBIT A. Page 47 of 49 10/06/26 | Item F1 | Attachment 6 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this Resolution be delivered forthwith by the Planning Commission Secretary to the City Council of the City of Atascadero. On motion by Commissioner ____________________, and seconded by Commissioner _________________________, the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety by the following roll call vote: AYES: ( ) NOES: ( ) ABSENT: ( ) ABSTAINED: ( ) ADOPTED: CITY OF ATASCADERO, CA _________________________________________ Jason Anderson Planning Commission Chairperson ATTEST: ___________________________________ Phil Dunsmore Planning Commission Secretary Page 48 of 49 10/06/26 | Item F1 | Attachment 6 I Exhibit A Revise Title 9, Chapter 11 to include the following new section: 11-5.03 Lot line adjustment review for flag lots. (a) The adjustment of all property lines containing a flag lot shall be permitted in accordance with the following design standards: (1) The original lot shall have frontage on a dedicated street. (2) The accessway to the rear lot shall be at least 20 feet wide for residential zones, except where the accessway is more than 150 feet long, it shall be at least 24 feet wide. For all other zones, the accessway shall be at least 30 feet wide. (3) The lot farthest from the street shall own the accessway in fee. Other lots using the accessway shall have an access and utility easement over it. (4) Lots utilizing the accessway of a flag lot may be required to enter into a road maintenance agreement to ensure perpetual maintenance and repair of the accessway. Page 49 of 49