Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC_8_11_2026_Public Comment Received by Email10 August 2026 To: Atascadero City Council CC: Jim Lewis, City Manager; Code Enforcement; Margaret Bullock; Leigh Livick From: Rob Livick, RE: 4543 Yerba Ave It has come to our attention that the Atascadero City Council will discuss potential litigation regarding Code Enforcement actions at 4543 Yerba Ave, Atascadero, CA (APN 028-151-017). We applaud Council’s actions taken on 27 May 2025 and subsequent City action that resulted in a clean-up of the property, which was based on a long history of code violations and citizen complaints; however, many neighbors have concerns about continued code violations at the property. The following is my summary of the issues raised by multiple neighbors. Issues: 1. Debris on property We believe the property is repeatedly exceeding the outdoor storage limits established by AMC § 9-6.130(g), and the condition repeatedly returns after enforcement-directed cleanup. We would like the City to evaluate the property for continuing/repeat violations of § 9-6.130(g), as well as any applicable solid-waste, nuisance, fire-safety, or vehicle- abatement provisions. 2. Lack of garbage collection service We believe the property owner lacks garbage and recycling service and does not have a valid “Self Haul” permit issued by the City in accordance with AMC § 6-4.104 and § 6-4.112. We would like the City to confirm if the property has a valid “Self Haul” permit and is in compliance with the requirements of said permit. If no permit exists, require the property owner to subscribe to and pay for the City's three or more-container collection services for weekly collection of recyclable materials, organic materials, and solid waste. 3. Fire Department Access We believe the property does not have adequate access and requires an unobstructed, safe means of egress (exit/entry path) from a building as required by the California Fire Code as adopted by AMC §4-7. We would like the City to evaluate the property for repeated violations of this requirement. 4. Burning of Residential Trash We believe the property owner is in violation of AMC § 5-7.02 (b)(2) by disposing of paper and other residential rubbish through burning. We request the City require compliance with this AMC section. Public Comment Received by Email 8/11/26 City Council Meeting Item A4a 5. Unleashed Aggressive Dog We believe the owners keep aggressive dog(s) on the property in violation of AMC § 4-1.121. The animal has attacked or menaced people and other animals in the neighborhood. We would like the City to require compliance with the applicable AMC sections. Questions for City Staff and City Council: •Does City Council Resolution 2025-028 remain relevant to the continuing conditions? •What is the City's procedure for a nuisance that reappears after City-ordered abatement? •Can the City initiate another nuisance-abatement proceeding without starting from the beginning? •Can the City impose another administrative citation or seek another abatement and recover the City's costs? •What documentation does Code Enforcement want from neighboring property owners to establish that the condition has reappeared?