Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 06/24/1997 *PUBLIQ REVIEW COPY ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING JUNE 24, 1997 - CITY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 6500 PALMA AVENUE, 4T" FLOOR ROTUNDA ROOM 7:00 P.M. George C�HaroldLua Ray Jerry Ken Johnson Clay Lerno This agenda is prepared and posted pursuant to the requirements Of Government code Section 54954.2. By listing a topic on this agenda, the City Council has expressed its intent to discuss and act on each item. In addition to any action identified in Me brief general description of each item, the action that may be taken shall include: A refer 1 to staff with specific requests for information; continuance;specific direction to staff conce wing the policy or mission of the item; discontinuance of consideration; authorization to enter into negotiations and execute agreements pertaining to the item; adoption or approval; and, disapproval. Copies of the staff reports or other documentation relating to each item of business referred to on the agenda are on file in the office of the City Clerk (Room 08) and in the Information Office (Room 103), available for public inspection during City Hal/ usiness hours. The City Clerk will answer any questions regarding the agenda. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need sp cial assistance to participate in a City meeting or other services offered by this City, please contact the City Manager's Office, (805) 461-5010, or the City Clerk's Office, (805) 461-5074. Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time when services are needed will assist the City staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the. meeting or service. 5:30 P.M. - BUDGET REVIEW SESSION CLOSED SESSION: CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR (G.C. Sec. 54957.6) Agency negotiator: Roy Hanley Employee organizations: Mid-Management/Professional, Atascadero FirE Captains, Atascadero Firefighters, Service Employees Intl Union Local 620 7:00 P.M. - REGULAR SESSION: (Please see Rules of Public Partici atio back page) CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL COUNCIL COMMENTS SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS: • Presentation of service recognition plaques to outgoing Planning Commissioners Jim ' Edwards, Sid Bowen and outgoing Parks& Recreation Commissioner Vic Smart COMMUNITY FORUM A. CONSENT CALENDAR: All matters listed under Item A, Consent Calendar, are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion in the form listed below. There will be no separate discussion on these items. A member of the Council or public may, by request, have any item removed from the Consent Calendar, which shall then be reviewed and acted upon separately after the adoption of the Consent - Calendar: 1. REJECTION OF BIDS FOR THE STATE ROUTE 41/ATASCADERO AVE. STORM DRAIN PROJECT (Bid No. 97-02) [John Neill (Staff recommendation: Reject all bidslReadvertise project w/revised scope of work) 2. RESOLUTION NO. 62-97 - Adopting a budget for the 1997-98 Fiscal Year and delegating to the City Manager authority to implement same [Rachelle Rickard/Robert Grogan] (Staff recommendation: Adopt) 3. RESOLUTION NO. 63-97 - Conveying the City's support of an "east-west" division- of the 805 area code, with the west retaining the existing 805 area code [Robert Grogan] (Staff recommendation: Adopt) B. PUBLIC HEARINGS: [None scheduled] i 2 C. REGULAR BUSINESS: 1. PG&E ACCELERATED DEPRECIATION OF DIABLO CANYON Re erred at the 6/5/97 Special Joint Meeting of the City Councils of San Luis Obispo County for action by individual cities [Presentation by PG&E representatives] (Staff recommendation: Provide direction) 2. SENATOR O'CONNELL REQUEST FOR SUPPORT OF $500,000 AUGMENTATION IN THE STATE BUDGET FOR THE CALL BOX PROGRAM IN S.L.O. COUNTY [Robert Grogan] (Staff recommendation: Review & provide direction) D. COMMITTEE REPORTS (The following represent standing commi tees. Informative status reports will be given, as felt necessary.): 1. S.L.O. County Mayors Group 2. S.L.O. Council of Governments/S.L.O. Regional Transit Authority 3. City/School Committee 4. County Water Advisory Board/Nacimiento Water Purveyors Advic ory Group 5. Economic Round Table 6. Finance Committee 7. Air Pollution Control District 8. North County Council 9. Ad Hoc Regional Water Management Committee 10. Integrated Waste 'Management Authority E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION: 1. City Council 2. City Attorney 3. City Clerk 4. City Treasurer 5. City Manager 3 RULES OF PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: The City Council welcomes and encourages your ideas and comments as a citizen. To increase the effectiveness of your participation, please familiarize yourself with the following rules of decorum: O Members of the audience, may speak on any item on the agenda, in the order the item(s) are addressed by the Council, as directed by the Mayor. Items not on the agenda should be submittedduring the Community.Forum period (see below). O Persons wishing to speak should`step to the podium and state their name and address,,for the official record. O All remarks shall be addressed to Council, as a whole, and not to any individual member:thereof. 0 No person shall be permitted to make slanderous, profane or personal remarks against any elected official, commissions and staff. O A person may speak for five (5) minutes. O No one may speak for a second time until everyone wishing to speak has had an opportunity to do so, and no one may speak more than twice on any item. O Council Members may question any speaker; the speaker may respond but, after the allotted time has expired, may not initiate further discussion. O The floor will then be closed to public participation and open for Council discussion. COMMUNITY FORUM: O The Community Forum period is provided to receive comments from the public on matters other than scheduled agenda items. O - A maximum of 30 minutes will be allowed for Community Forum, unless Council authorizes an extension. O State law does not allow the Council to take action on issues not on the agenda;staff may be asked to follow up on such items. JUN-17-1997 08:09 FROM NORTH COAST ENG, INC TO WAS CIT} HALL P.01 REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL Meeting Date: 06/24/97 CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item: A-1 THROUGH: Robert.F. Grogan, Interim City Manager FROM: J94 john B Neil, Assistant City Engineer VIA: ' Oteven ). Sylvester, City Engineer W-RIECT: Rejection of bids for the State Route 41/Atascadero Avenue Storm Drain Project (Bid No. 97=02). RECOMMENDATION: 1. Reject all bids: 2. Re-advertise the project with a revised scope of work. DSS-�12�14 Two bids were received for the construction of the State Route 41/Atascadero Avenue Storm Drain Project. 'Both bids exceeded the available funding for the project ($732,000). Staff is recommending that the bids be rejected. Staff is also recommending that the project be re-advertised with a revised scope-of-work in order to bring project costs more in-line with the project budget. The revised scope-of-work will allow for alternate types of storm'drain pipe and trench backfill material. E CAL IMPACT- The fiscal impact is anticipated to be approximately $400.00 (the cost of posting the legal notice). ATTACHMENTS: Attachment-A, Bid Summary 61DREJECT.RP7 000001 JUN-17-1997 08:09 FROM NORTH COAST ENG, INC TO ATAS CITY HALL P.02 BID SUMMARY TO: John Neil, Assistant City Engineer FROM: Marcia M. Torgerson City Clerk BID NO.: 97-02 OPENED ; 08/12/97 2:00 p.m. PROJECT: Highway 41 / Atascadero Ave. Drainage Project (2) bids were received and opened today, as follows: Bi der Base Bid Additive No. 1 Total Spiess Construction $855,474.00 $31,460.00 $886,934.00 P.O. Box 2849 Santa Maria, CA 937-6859 Whitaker Const. $860,228.50 $43,160. 0 903,388.50 P.Q. Box 910 Santa Margarita, CA 438-5751 Attachments: 2 bids i ATTACHMENT A, BID SUMMARY STATE Rol1TF AVATecrAnED^ •»r... ,r TOTAL P.02 000002 AGENDA 1IE�E�T`i6/24/97 f[EMg Q�,�,,.,..�. bA Y�r,__24/97- RESOLUTION NO. 62-97 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO ADOPTING A BUDGET FOR THE 1997-98 FISCAL YEAR AND DELEGATING TO THE CITY MANAGER AUTHORITY TO IMPLEMENT SAME WHEREAS,the 1997-98 fiscal budget of the City of Atascadero has been submitted to this Council and has now been considered and is in final form and substance satisfactory to this Council;: NOW,THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED as follows: 1. The fiscal budget for the City of Atascadero for the fiscal year 1997-98,a summary of which is attached(Exhibit A), setting forth the budget totals and hereby incorporated by reference as though here fully set forth,is hereby adopted in the form on file with the City Clerk; 2. All encumbrances as of June 30, 1997,as represented by outstandingpurchase orders, and approved capital projects in process,are hereby authorized to be carried forward into the 1997-98 budget; • 3. The City Manager is hereby authorized to take all necessary actions to implement the provisions of said budget as adopted on this date, including: adjustments to the budget for unanticipated expenditures offset by revenues and any other adjustments approved by Council prior to the adoption of this resolution; 4. All General Fund balances as of June 30 each year will be appropriated into the Reserves. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 24`h day of June, 1997. CITY OF ATASCADERO By: RAY JOHNSON,Mayor ATTEST: MARCIA M.TORGERSON, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: • ROY HANLEY, City Attorney 000003 EXHIBIT A CITY OF ATASCADERO Budget for Fiscal Year 1997-98 1997-98 Budget General Fund Police $ 2,547,150 Fire and Weed Abatement 1,377,750 Community&Economic Development Administration 148,530 Planning 238,970 Building Inspection 173,130 Engineering 140,650 Community Services Administration 97,620 Recreation 348,820 Zoo 337,770 Lake Pavilion 83,400 Parks Maintenance 306,320 . Facilities Maintenance 176,570 City Council 25,390 City Clerk 51,210 City Treasurer 4,300 Legal and Code Enforcement 123,920 City Manager 150,870 • Personnel and Recruitment 58,190 Finance 219,080 Risk Management 278,470 Non Departmental 893,280 Total General Fund 7,781,390 Other Funds Gas Tax Fund 476,070 Transit Services Fund 439,610 Wastewater Operations& Facilities Fund 2,282,040 Capital Projects Fund 1,504,160 Local Transportation Fund-Non Transit 166,340 Sidewalk In Lieu Fees Fund 36,850 Amapoa/Tecorida Drainage Fund 146,510 Growth Mitigation-Streets&Bridge Impact Fees Fund 628,790 Growth Mitigation- Drainage Impact Fees Fund 305,440 Growth Mitigation- Police Impact Fees Fund 21,000 Growth Mitigation- Fire Impact Fees Fund 35,680 Growth Mitigation-Parks&Recreation Impact Fees Fund 37,400 Street Maintenance District Fund - Tree Planting Fund 2,000 Total expenses $13,863,280 • B-11 000004 I j MEETING AGENDA i DATE6/24/97 {TEM# A-3 RESOLUTION NO. 63-97 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA SUPPORTING AN EAST-WEST, GEOGRAPHICAL DIVISION OF THE 805 AREA CODE, WITH THE WEST RETAINING THE EXISTING 805 AREA CODE WHEREAS, A split of the existing 805 area code is pending, due to the increasing demand for new telephone services and numbers in the region; and WHEREAS, The two plans proposed by the telecommunications industry for splitting the 805 area code would geographically divide the existing code on either a "north-south" or "east-west" basis; and WHEREAS, The City of Atascadero feels it is key for the Tri-County (San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara and Ventura counties) region to remain together and retain the existing 805 area code; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Atascadero to support the proposed "east-west" division, with the west retaining the existing 805 area code. ON MOTION BY Councilmember seconded by Councilmember the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll-call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ADOPTED: CITY OF ATASCADERO ATTEST: RAY JOHNSON, Mayor MARCIA M. TORGERSON, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: ROY A. HANLEY, Deputy City Attorney i 000005 �1 Fr-Fr-,rF1 CITY OF ATASCADERO 1918 � � aA 1979 OFFICE of the CITY MANAGER June 13, 1997 Mr. Doug Hescox California Area Code Relief Coordinator California Code Administration 2600 Camino Ramon, Room IS9000 San Ramon, CA 94583 Re: 805 Area Code Dear Mr. Hescox: This is to advise that the City of Atascadero supports the east-west division, with the west retaining the existing 805 area code. This is important, as this division most closely follows the State Office of Emergency Services Region 1, which includes both of our emergency services— Police and Fire. Also, many of our regional associations with whom we are in touch on a regular basis lie within this area. This matter will be placed on the City of Atascadero City Council agenda of June 24, 1997 in the form of a resolution ratifying the position stated above. Thank you for the opportunity to provide input on this important matter. Sincerely, 1134E'R'tF. GR N Interim City Manager RFG:ch c: Sen. Jack O'Connell City Council 6500 PALMA AVENUE ATASCADERO,CALIFORNIA 93422 (805)461-5010 000006 -GRAMENTO OFFICE 6 CAPITOL ROOM 2187 SACRAMENTO.CA 95814 (916)445.5405 SAN LUIS OBISPO OFFICE 50 CHORRO STREET.SUITE A 3AN LUIS OBISPO.CA 93401 r.x,• Sa805)547.1800 ABARBARAOFFICE SENATOR T CARRILLO.SUITE F JACK O'CONNELL SANTA BARBARA CA 93101 COMMITTEES: (805)966-2296 EIGHTEENTH SENATORIAL DISTRICT TOAND PUBLIC SAFETY VENTURA OFFICE MANAGEMENT SUITE E MEM 3.CALIFORNIA STREET. BER: VENTURA.CA 93001 BUDGET AND FISCAL REVIEW (805)641.1500 - BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONS �•"-- EDUCATION May 27,1997 1 I - INSURANCE 1 .JUDICIARY 2 / ATURAL RESO MAY. .... ...A Ll Ray Johnson,Mayor r= City of Atascadero — 6500 Palma Atascadero,CA 93422 Dear Ray: I am writing to request your action on an important issue facing the residents of the Tri-County area. As you may know, the existing 805 area code, which currently serves all of Santa Barbara County, the majority of Kern, Ventura and San Luis Obispo counties, the north portion of Los Angeles County, and very small portions of Monterey, Fresno, Kings and Tulare counties,will be split in the coming months. This split is necessitated because by 1999 another area code will be required to keep up with the increasing demand for new telephone services and numbers in the region. 0 The two plans proposed by the telecommunications industry for splitting the 805 area code would geographically divide the existing code on either a"north-south"or"east-west"basis. The north-south option would place Ventura County with the southeastern portion of Kern County(including Edwards, Mojave and Rosamond)and most of the northern portion of Los Angeles County (including the Santa Clarita Valley, Newhall, Palmdale and Lancaster) in the "south" area. The "north" area would serve all of Santa Barbara County,the vast majority of San Luis Obispo County and most of Kern County. On the other hand, the east-west option would result in the vast majority of San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara and Ventura counties remaining together in the`west"area,with the"east"area containing the majority of Kern County and the northern portion of Los Angeles County. I believe you would agree that it is key for the Tri-County region to remain intact, as well as retain the existing 805 area code. Therefore, I am requesting that you join me in supporting the"east-west"division,with the west retaining the exi_ sting 805 area code. In this regard, I respectfully request that you approve a resolution indicating this position and then forward it to the California Code Administration at the following address: Mr. Doug Hescox California Area Code Relief Coordinator California Code Administration 2600 Camino Ramon,Room IS9000 San Ramon,CA 94583 Thank you in advance for your attention to this important matter. Sincerely, oe Jack O'Connell JO:kk P5 •00000'7 a REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item: C-2 From: Robert F. &4 4, Interim City Manager Meeting Date; 6/24/97 SUBJECT: Senator O'Connell request for support of $500,000 augmentation in the State budget for the call box program in S.L.O. County RECOMMENDATION: Review and provide direction. BACKGROUND: The material for this item was not received in time for analysis or, staff review. The following was faxed by Tom Jones of Sen. O'Connell's staff in Sari Luis Obispo: 1 . Draft example for lobbying Gov. Wilson and Sen. Thompson 2. Sen. O'Connell letter of 5/15/97 to Senate Budget & Fiscal Review Subcommittee #4 3. SLOCOG Draft Table C-5-3 4. Sen. O'Connell News Release of 6/13/97: "O'Connell and 'Fix 46' Leaders Urge Support for Callbox Money" This matter was presented to the City Council at its meeting of 0/24/96 and failed passage by a 3:2 vote (minutes excerpt attached). RFG:ch Attachments i 000008 SENT BY: 0000000000000000000; 6-16-97 3:53PM; 0000000000000000000 => 805 461 0606; #2/5 DRAFT EXAMPLE FOR LOBBYING GOV. & SENATOR THOMPSON June 16, 1997 (write to each separately) Honorable Mike Thompson Honorable Pete Wilson Senate Budget Committee Governor State Capitol,Room 5013 State Capitol,Fist Floor Sacramento,CA 95814 Sacramento,CA 95814 916/445-5202 916/445-2841 RE: $500,000 budget item for San Luis Obispo Callboxes Dear X: The City of(X)strongly urges you to support Senator O'Connell's$500,000 augmentation in the state budget for the callbox program in San Luis Obispo County. Recently,the cities in San Luis Obispo County and the County Board of Supervisors have approved the one-dollar vehicle registration fee to pay for the 170 callboxes along US 1,US 101, and SR 46. However, due to the low number of vehicles in San Luis Obispo County,it will take several years to fund the callbox program. As you know,these highways are used by the tens of thousands of travelers in our state who drive through the county from other parts of the state. Therefore,since many of the users who will benefit from the program are residents from other areas,we fell it wholly appropriate to use state funds to accelerate the installation of callboxes along our rural highways to benefit all Californians. Accordingly,the City of(X)urges you to support the callbox augmentation for San Luis Obispo County. Sincerely, John Doe cc: Senator O'Connell 000009 SENT BY: 0000000000000000000; 6-16-97 3:54PM; 0000000000000000000 => 605 461 0606; #3/5 SE.v -ATE r_A'AMENP,TOL ROOM 5035 SZCRAMENTO CA 9581A ;�% tt 4• '9115, A5 5-05 -AN LIJI$OBiF(: )I--.CE CItl�rlrttt P2ttL f, RRC STREET. U:TE A /1 AN:JJ,S 091a P^ CA ROSt SA7.1k30'0 rA a SARA oaa,cE SENATOR y.VFST-aRR1L_O SL1TFF JACK O'CONNEl_L 6L _TMF,TcE REVIE AN?A BARB-RA CA 93101 S �BCCM M:TT'E ON R°5:"tb-z39e AUC EIGHTEENTH SENATORIAL DISTRICT cJORIT CAUUs to AJORITV CAUCUS .ENrL F.::F FIc:C vtE.fllw :d9 5 -AUFORNIA 57RF.FT SJITc E • BUDGET AND FISCAL REVIEl9 :ENTURA CA 93001 ©USINESS ANL)PROFESSION`: 805.641.15CA CONS'ITUT;ONAL AMENDM:NTS =DUC-.TION E NV;P0NMFNTAL:'UAL.TY May 15, 1997 NATTURALYRESOURCES Honorable Steve Peace, Chairman Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Subcommittee#4 State Capitol,Room 5080 Sacramento,CA 95814 Dear Steve: This is to request that your committee appropriate$500,000 from the 911 Account to the County of San Luis Obispo to facilitate the installation of that county's callbox project. 'I understand there is a substantial reserve in that account and I can think of no better way to use some of those reserves to benefit public safety and the motoring public. Recently, the county approved the one-dollar registration fee to pay for callboxes, but because the number of vehicles in the county is relatively small,it would literally take years to raise the funds needed to pay for all 170 of the callboxes slated to be installed along US 1 and US 101, as well as SR 46. In addition,these fee funds are needed to pay for operation of the callbox system within the county. Since I first began representing San Luis Obispo County in January of 1995, I have advocated for a callbox program. I felt that the lack of callboxes along the county's sometimes desolate highways presented a major safety risk to county residents, as well as the tens of thousands of state travelers who drive through the county from other parts of the state. Sincerely, JJ K O'CONNELL 10:kjt B3c cc: Honorable Mike Thompson,Chair, Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Committee Members, Budget and Fiscal Review Subcommittee#4 Krist Lane F RINTFC >.FEC Y:.::_EC--, R V 0 0.10 SENT BY: 0000000000000000000; 6-16-97 3:55PM; 0000000000000000000 => 805 461 0606; #4/5 ` , I _> uuuuuuu000000u00000; mi btfvl by: uuu=;uuuuuuvuwuuuu; a-f5-Wl 4;vorml- uuuvuvuuuvuuvvvvvvu , �• '. CAPr- 0 0 n � gQooQ0C� o a N o co ( w O � Q O O q O N CV CN co N O C\f EN � Ql N C\t T- 1Q N N �tf N � p oaoa �jpoQoga $ co q M R - O Q n Irl p +Oa 'fi C2 a6 dei ? 11) q N Oj [V lV - I - _ O iQ� i0 4 Ln C4 cd u; £ nt c +- ca m o m r- o r� r CD , V- a a c v w CV r N kn CV wo ty Q ti tp M cch� o ooaoo•oo cv 'r. SW $ 47i o o x }. H of v ri al cfl t- Qi ers .- yrs w C C%l "- $ N C tit Q i7 R r CD UJ � a M W N7 �j r„ft N .f^.r N Z o g 0000 � $ o8 `8' S88yo � �-'t>' al oo oocnuzvo _ a � v > a do 1 000 z V w M O a o cm O V 0 1 *� �e+• M h n LO LL Lm 0) cm Vf vi C4 i vi INS uo o } 8► J E T r C%JLU Ed N � k c � N v $ o � oca oaooQooc000v �+ o CD G U Q _ T 16 N r y! f U/ - � isr .�`" W N . XI Cc � fl LU ch uu -a qq W al 1° a u a n. N �t ,� 2 • it 4 v � ®® `� � sz � 8 » LU Ri .� d #N a D . Z e! ee 9 2 ad 0OO a l IL V y (� sae. 000011 SENT BY: 0000000000000000000; 6-16-97 3:55PM; 0000000000000000000 => 805 461 0606; #515 CALIFORNIA STATE SENATE JACK O'CONNELL Senator, 18th District Representing San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara and Ventura Counties FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT:GAVIN PAYNE JUNE 13, 1997 916/445-5405 O'CONNELL AND `FIX 46' LEADERS URGE SUPPORT FOR CALLBOX MONEY SAN LUIS OBISPO...Senator Jack O'Connell was joined this afternoon at the San Luis Obispo County Courthouse by Ted Miller and Tom Rusch of the Fix 46 committee to urge county residents to get behind Senator O'Connell's request for$500,000 in the state budget to jump-start the emergency roadside callbox system. O'Connell also urged residents to write and call Sacramento to urge the budget conference committee and the Governor to approve the funds during ongoing budget deliberations. O'Connell said,"I was very pleased that the Senate approved this funding in our version of the budget. Our task now is to make sure the budget conference committee and the Governor know how very important this project is to public safety in our county." fie added,"A lot of people drive on our roads who could benefit from roadside callboxes. We've seen a definite increase in safety in other parts of the state as a result of callboxes, and I'm glad we were able to earmark these funds to get our own local system off the ground. Now it's time to take the next step in the process." Recently,the San Luis Obispo Council of Governments approved adding one dollar to every vehicle registration fee to pay for callboxes as part of the state program,but it was projected to take several years to raise sufficient funds to install all 170 callboxes along Highways 1 and 101,as well a9 State Route 46. This$500,000 identified by O'Connell could give the county almost a three year head start on full implementation. "The need for callboxes for the 41/46 corridor is now,"said Ted Miller,Assistant Project Coordinator for Fix 46. Miller added,"Not awarding San Luis Obispo County the budget request that Senator O'Connell has worked for will delay callboy installation on 41/46 as I' well as other state roads." O'Connell noted that the Budget Conference Committee would be meeting in the next two weeks to craft the final budget and send it to the Governor by the end of June. California's fiscal year begins on July 1. #9# NOTE: Below are addresses for the Budget Committee and the Governor: Honorable Mike Thompson cd Honorable Pete Wilson Senate Budget Committee Governor State Capitol, Room 5013 State Capitol,First Floor Sacramento, CA 95814 Sacramento, CA 95814 9161445-5202 9161445-2841 STATE CAPITOL ROOM 2187-SACRAMENTO,CALIFORNIA 45813•19167 445-5405 fl 1260 CHORRO STREET,SUITE A-SAN LUIS OBISPO,CALIFORNIA 93401-1805)547.1800 U 228 W.CARRILLO,SUITE F•SANTA BARBARA,CALIFORNIA 93301 •(905)966-2296 L1 89 S.CALIFORNIA STREET,SUITE E-VENTURA.CALIFORNIA 93001-(805)641-1500 000012 ffi Council followed. Coun ilmember Johnson voiced a concern that the language in the development standads does not reflect the kind of flexibility he would like to see. Public Comments: Richard Shannon , marketing agent, provided land use zoning history an suggested that w \enthe City initiates a zone change it should notify e property owners. Allan Yarborough, Atascadero Ford, reported that he is the pote ial buyer for the subject project and object's\to proposed development standar that require a landscaped berm and freeway screening. Micki Ready, Chamber of Commerce, commented that e condition referred to by Mr. Yarborough would create a deterrent to business She suggested that the language be dropped, or changed, to flow greater exibility for certain businesses that rely on freeway visibility. Steve DeCamp clarified that if there is an a I able use with no development standards (like that of vehicle storage), itou�d require no further review and suggested that the Council may want m e control over what is visible from the freeway. He also emphasized that "p rking" areas are not "display" area and suggested that the development sta and language\i,, modified through the conditional use permit process. C uncilmember John 1 n suggested that the intent 0 of the development standard be ore clearly worded. Sleeve DeCamp recommended that if the Cou it desires to modify the language that it be remanded back to staff. Ro Hanley noted that he had some specific suggestions for changes that will sols all the concerns. Councilmember L`u a commented that he would prefer to see nguage modified by conditional use per it, however, Councilmember Card argued that the City Council already revie s numerous appeals and would upport revise the ordinance at this rather than ha e it circumvented lat Steve DeCa proposed that development standards be added to only the ist of allowable es and recommended that development standards for conditional allowed des could be applied during the development review process. Counc' ember Luna suggested that staff, the applicant, potential buyer and Cha er representative meet with the Deputy City Attorney and bring proposed re ns to the ordinance language back in two weeks. By mutual agreement, the atter was continued and staff was given direction as recommended. C. REGULAR BUSINESS: 1. RESOLUTION NO. 84-96 - Expressing support for the formation of a service authority for freeway emergencies (SAFE) (S.L.0. Council of Governments (COG) recommendation. Adopt) Peter Rodgers, San Luis Obispo Council of Governments, provided a summary of the Call Box Program and summarized the key benefits. He explained that in order to proceed, a majority of the cities in the county must approve the formation of a call box authority. In addition, the County Board of Supervisors will be asked to CC 9/24/96 000013 Oprove the program. Council questions followed regarding fees, staffing, the call box authority and how the money will be used. Mr. Rodgers explained that the program will be fully audited and that there will be no new employees, committees and/or meetings. He reported that the fees collected will be used for capital and on-going expenditures and explained that no sunset date is being proposed. Atascadero will have input on the location of the call boxes via the City's representative on the COG, he concluded. Mayor Highland pointed out that this is the second dollar increase in the past two years and voiced disapproval. He asserted that the COG is the fastest growing bureaucracy in the county. Public Comments: Ray Jansen proclaimed that the State should have already made available to the public call boxes and verbally protestes the State's confiscation of certain taxes intended for driver education programs. Dwight Goggins, local California Highway Patrol Commander, spoke in support of the program because it saves patrol costs, emergency response times and often lives. leeggie Chambers, county resident, also supports the call box program and encouraged approval. ---end of public testimony--- MOTION: By Councilmember Luna, seconded by Councilmember Johnson to adopt Resolution No. 84-96; motion failed 2:3 (Luna and Johnson in favor, Carden, Bewley and Highland opposed). 2.----- :- ORDINANCE NO. 309 - Amending the official city zoning map by rezoning/ (Cotain real property at 2005-2375 EI Camino Real/5505 Del Ria from GN rrLercial Neighborhood) and RS (Residential Suburban) to CPQ -,---- (Commeri t Park) and RMF-10 (PD7) Low Density Multiple �PTK y Residential, P 8r ed Development Overlay No. 7 (Zone C ange 95013; Investec) (Staff recommendation: aive reading in full a adopt on second reading by title only) Councilmember Bewley stepped down d to otential conflict of interest. Steve DeCamp provided the brief staff re and recom ndation to adopt.' Public Comments: Wonald Jones co nded that the City Council has taken action to appTrove false ocuments. argued that staff has changed the plans, ignored architectu al input a isrepresented the project. ---end of public testimony--- CC 9/24/96 000014