The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda Packet 06/10/1997 *PUBLIC REVIEW COPY Please do not rMove from counter ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING JUNE 10, 1997 CITY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 6500 PALMA AVENUE, 4T" FLOOR ROTUNDA ROOM 7:00 P.M. George Harold Ray Jerry Ken Luna Carden Johnson Clay Lerno This agenda is prepared and posted pursuant to the requirements of Government code Section 54954.2. By listing a topic on this agenda, the City Council has expressed its intent to discuss and act on each item. In addition to any action identified in the brief general description of each item, the action that may be taken shall include: A referral to staff with specific requests for information; continuance;specific direction to staff concerning the policy or mission of the item; discontinuance of consideration; authorization to enter into negotiations and execute agreements pertaining to the item; adoption or approval; and, disapproval. Copies of the staff reports or other documentation relating to each item of business referred to on the agenda are on file in the office of the City Clerk (Room 2081 and in the Information Office (Room 103), available for public inspection during City Hall business hours. The City Clerk will answer any questions regarding the agenda. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in a City meeting or other services offered by this City, please contact the City Managers Office, (805) 461-5010, or the City Clerk's Office, (805) 461-5074. Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time when services are needed will assist the City staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting or service. 5:30 P.M. - INTERVIEW SESSION: 1. PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION A. Interview & consider candidates B. Select, by ballot, three citizens for appointment C. Resolution No. 43-97 - Formalizing appointments (Staff recommendation: Adopt) 2. BUILDING & CONSTRUCTION BOARD OF APPEALS A. Interview & consider candidates B. Select, by ballot, one citizen for appointment C. Resolution No. 45-97 - Formalizing appointment (Staff recommendation: Adopt) CLOSED SESSION: CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR (G.C. Sec. 54957.6) Agency negotiator: Roy Hanley Employee organizations: Mid-Management/Professional, Atascadero Fire Captains, Atascadero Firefighters, Atascadero Sergeants Service Organization, Atascadero Police Officers Association, Atascadero Public Safety Technicians Organization, Service Employees Intl. Union Local 817, Confidential Employees CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION (G.C. Sec. 54956.9) Initiation of litigation: One potential case (Colony Roads) 7:00 P.M. - REGULAR SESSION: (P/ease see Rules of Public Participation, back page) CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL COUNCIL COMMENTS PROCLAMATION: • "California Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run Day", June 16, 1997 [SLO Co. Special Olympics] COMMUNITY FORUM A. CONSENT CALENDAR: All matters listed under Item A, Consent Calendar, are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion in the form listed below. There will be no separate discussion on these items. A member of the Council or public may, by request, have any item removed from the Consent Calendar, which shall then be reviewed and acted upon separately after the adoption of the Consent Calendar. 1. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - March 25, 1997 [Marcia Torgerson] (City Clerk recommendation: Approve) 2. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - April 16, 1997 [Marcia Torgerson] (City Clerk recommendation: Approve) 2 3. FINAL PARCEL MAP 96001, 4055 EL CAMINO REAL - Consideration of a final parcel map to subdivide a 0.55-acre parcel into three (3) lots of 10,500 sq. ft., 6850 sq. ft and 6,850 sq. ft. (Grummitt/Volbrecht Surveys) [Doug Davidson] • (Planning Commission/Staff recommendation: Approve) 4. FINAL PARCEL MAP 92004, 8785 ATASCADERO AVE. - Consideration of a final parcel map to divide one 1.34-acre (gross) lot into .55 and .50 acres net (Johnson/Central Coast Engineering) [Doug Davidson] (Planning Commission/Staff recommendation: Approve) t 5. FINAL TRACT MAP 14-89, 8625 ATASCADERO AVE. - Consideration of a final map to subdivide a portion of two existing lots (13.9 acres total) into 23 one-half acre parcels for single-family residential use (Iverson/Central Coast Engineering) [Doug Davidson] (Planning Commission/Staff recommendation: Approve) 6. RESOLUTION NO. 46-97 - Authorizing execution of an agreement with Steve Robinson, D.V.M., for veterinary services at the Charles Paddock Zoo [Brady Cherry] (Staff recommendation: Approve) 7. RESOLUTION NO. 44-97 - Clarifying approval of the City's participation in the Central Coast Recycling Market Development Zone [Doug Davidson] (Staff recommendation: Adopt) 8. ORDINANCE NO. 330 - Amending Section 9-3.173 and Section 9-4.120 of the Zoning Ordinance text regarding the creation of and standards for parking lots for commercial uses located within multiple family zoning districts (ZC 96015; Niven) [Doug Davidson] (Planning Commission/Staff recommendation: Motion to waive reading in full and adopt on second reading by title only) B. PUBLIC HEARINGS: [None scheduled] C. REGULAR BUSINESS: 1. RESOLUTION NO. 47-97 - Authorizing execution of a first amendment to agreement with Laidlaw Transit Services, Inc., extending the term of the existing agreement /Brady Cherry] (Staff recommendation: Adopt) 3 2. RESOLUTION NO. 40-97 - Approving an Arts-In-Public-Places Policy for the City of Atascadero (cont'd from 5/27/97) [Brady Cherry] (Staff recommendation: Approve proposed policy) D. COMMITTEE REPORTS (The following represent standing committees. Informative status reports will be given, as felt necessary.): 1. S.L.O. County Mayors Group 2. S.L.O. Council of Governments/S.L.O. Regional Transit Authority 3. City/School Committee 4. County Water Advisory Board/Nacimiento Water Purveyors Advisory Group 5. Economic Round Table 6. Finance Committee 7. Air Pollution Control District 8. North County Council 9. Ad Hoc Regional Water Management Committee • 10. Integrated Waste Management Authority E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION: 1 . City Council 2. City Attorney 3. City Clerk 4. City Treasurer 5. City Manager 4 • RULES OF PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: The City Council welcomes and encourages your ideas and comments as a citizen. To increase the effectiveness of your participation, please familiarize yourself with the following rules of decorum: O Members of the audience may speak on any item on the agenda, in the order the item(s) are addressed by the Council, as directed by the Mayor. Items not on the agenda should be submitted during the Community Forum period (see below). O Persons wishing to speak should step to the podium and state their name and address, for the official record. O All remarks shall be addressed to Council, as a whole, and not to any individual member thereof. O No person shall be permitted to make slanderous, profane or personal remarks against any elected official, commissions and staff. O A person may speak for five (5) minutes. O No one may speak for a second time until everyone wishing to speak has had an opportunity to do so, and no one may speak more than twice on any item. O Council Members may question any speaker; the speaker may respond but, after the allotted time has expired, may not initiate further discussion. O The floor will then be closed to public participation and open for Council discussion. COMMUNITY FORUM: O The Community Forum period is provided to receive comments from the public on matters other than scheduled agenda items. O A maximum of 30 minutes will be allowed for Community Forum, unless Council authorizes an extension. O State law does not allow the Council to take action on issues not on the agenda; staff may be asked to follow up on such items. REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL Meeting Date: 6/10/97 CITY OF ATASCADERO 5:30 p.m. Interview Session Through: Robert Grogan, Interim City Manager From: Marcia M. Torgerson, City Clerk SUBJECT: Interview for Parks and Recreation Commission. RECOMMENDATION: 1) Interview and consider the candidates. 2) Select, by ballot, three citizens for appointment. 3) Adopt Resolution No. 43-97 formalizing the appointments. BACKGROUND: • The terms of three members of the Parks and Recreation Commission (George 9 Beatie, Barbara Butz and Victor Smart) expired February 1, 1997. The City Clerk has solicited applications from the members of the public pursuant to State Law. DISCUSSION: Five applications were received and interview times have been established for each candidate. It has been verified by the City Clerk's office that all of the applicants are residents and registered voters in the City of Atascadero. Attachments: Interview Schedule 5 applications Municipal Code.Title 2, Chapter 13 Draft Resolution No. 43-97 INTERVIEW SCHEDULE PARKS AND,RECREATION COMMISSION BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION BOARD OF APPEALS Tuesday, June 10, 1997 - 5:30 p.m. Club Room 5:30 - Barbara Butz 5:40 - Gail Kudlac 5:50 - Maree Whitten 6:00 - Richard Randise 6:10 - George Beatie 6:20 - COUNCIL VOTES 6:30 - Jim Melvin 6:40 - Steve McManus 6:50 - COUNCIL VOTES �3 Please return to: i \ !u, a�!'I CITY CLERK ....r.Igo 6500 Palma Avenue Room 208 t•••i Atascadero, CA 93422 I I( 9. C CITY OF ATASCADERO BOARD, COMMITTEE & COMMISSION APPLICATIONI Please Note: You must meet the minimum qualifications of being a registered voter and resident of the City, with the exception of youth representatives who are not required to be registered voters. Minimum qualifications are subject to verification. Please fill out and attach the Supplemental Questionnaire for the advisory body you are applying for. NAME: WL �- RESIDENTIAL e,(� ADDRESS: �� I c�,�dG - t 0 Home Phone: 461— I9-3�z MAILING ADDRESS (if different): Work Phone: Are you a resident of the City of At scadero? G How Long? Are you a registered voter? Yes No Social Security No. Z6 OCCUPATION: I¢�.Ck,gj!-I EMPLOYMENT: Present or last employer's name, address and phone number: afar .d U� t SC-11 cc, ( 10;--J Y,i ' S60k U),6QA CLhaSCo dC) 4�a - q-,p oC-D Position held and length of employment: EDUCATION: RELEVANT TRAINING, EXPERIENCE, CERTIFICATES OF TRAINING, LICENSES OR PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION: `7 e cx Y c.Y ry\ 6 n Tarkc, s � CC Vvt NA tt,!�i L1---r This application and supplement are "public documents" and are available for review upon.request. Applicants are advised they may be requested to file a Statement of Economic Interest, pursuant to the Fair PoliticalPractices regulations. Information will be provided by the City Clerk. Board, Committee & Commission Application Page 1 INVOLVEMENT IN COMMUNITY, VOLUNTEER, PROFESSIONAL AND/OR ACADEMIC ORGANIZATIONS: -0 RaJLMj;I j l seyv tZ (20rvt kV.dkJ, C �h IN«cvta6�> �oct-..tet •C� G-6C�� i` Cl t� C�Oc. . O C�Wt 1✓:a.S OTHER CITY COMMISSIONS, COMMITTEES OR BOARDS PREVIOUSLY OR CURRENTLY SERVING ON: _ f How did you learn about this vacancy? Newspaper Article Newspaper Ad _ Community Group Word of Mouth Library City Hall Place of Employment Other (specify): 6a,4L�M `+f �� lY � Please complete the attached supplemental questionnaire. Feel free to attach a resume or other information about yourself. I hereby certify, under penalty of perjury, that the information on this application and attached supplement are true and correct. L Signature: Date: /O — cj Board, Committee & Commission Application Page 2 CITY OF ATASCADERO SUPPLEMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION 1. Please explain why you would like to serve on the Parks & Recreation Commission. r ti 2. hat is it about the Parks & Recreation Commission that interests you? What qualities, experience and expertise would you bring to the Commission? z 61 %i G ,rte "ez� 1 i p r a_ Lc�� 3. Wh t role does parks and recreation play in maintaining a healthy city? 2 d,a, I Zvi o� IL17 Alit Supplemental Questionnaire Parks & Recreation Commission Page 2 4. How would you see your role as a member of the Commission?ft FIV LSP ' 5. In your opinion, what are Atascadero's greatest public recreation needs? � l( v !� •� ,r ,�._ Q tiC.f� �C��%�C�1 �'Lr.��C��`-civ ��1! 5. What methods should be used to fund Atascadero's public recreation programs and facilities? i l i � II 0 Supplemental Application Parks & Recreation Commission Page 3 7. _If appointed, what specific goals would you like to see the Commission achieve? eZ �8. lfe is addition��i ou woul like to share about yo self, please use �EFie following space provided (optional). 0 1 hereby certify that the foregoing information is true and correct. Date: 9 Si nature• Please return to: CITY CLERK eiW x O 6500 Palma Avenue Room 208 i sera 9 q 1979>—P ;. Atascadero, CA 93422 CAD M11:AY Co CITY OF ATASCADERO BOARD, COMMITTEE & COMMISSION APPLICATION Please Note: You must meet the minimum qualifications of being a registered voter and resident of the City, with the exception of youth representatives who are not required to be registered voters. Minimum qualifications are subject to verification. Please fill out and attach the Supplemental Questionnaire for the advisory body you are applying for. ' l NAME: 4'�/Q �.]Q"L !� C-- RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL ADDRESS: \ "/� _ Home Phone: MAILING ADDRESS (if different): Work Phone: Are you a resident of the City of Atascadero? yes How Long? 9,�,5 / Are you a registerredd voter? Yes✓ No / Social Security No. OCCUPATION: / i1 0O f,5si0/I61l EMPLOYMENT: Present or last employer's name, address and phone numbers: ndQ 00o Position((held and length off employment: EDUCATION:. RELEVANT TRAINING, EXPERIENCE, CERTIFICATES OF TRAINING, LICENSES OR PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION: This application and supplement are "public documents" and are available for review upon request. Applicants are advised they may be requested to file a Statement of Economic Interest, pursuant to the Fair Political Practices regulations. Information will be provided by the City Clerk. Board, Committee &Commission Application Page 1 INVOLVEMENT IN COMMUNITY, VOLUNTEER, PROFESSIONAL AND/OR ACADEMIC ORGANIZATIONS: (,>)kcAi Is !/IG 6Fa1451.1a) �OZ t�C i9/`G �/Z .S/►dui //J /Ycl Us�. _-P 1- cis/.D�i✓� Qn1p �/�e-� /" cslJc=n�7L ✓�c�: ts5lbdi✓�`" Of 19A45Z9PeX0 l�cs�v1J ccznls D.n�iJ C fj OTHER CITY COMMISSIONS, COMMITTEES OR BOARDS PREVIOUSLY OR CURRENTLY SERVING ON: How did you learn about this vacancy? Newspaper Article ✓ Newspaper Ad - - Community Group Word of Mouth Library City Hall Place of Employment Other (specify): Please complete the attached supplemental questionnaire. Feel free to attach a resume or other information about yourself. I hereby certify, under penalty of perjury, that the information on this application and attached supplement are true and correct. Signature: Gz�� Date: /— ,I — Board, Committee & Commission Application Page 2 CITY OF ATASCADERO SUPPLEMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION 1. Please explain why you would like to serve on the Parks & Recreation Commission.. 146 ec, me- e;r, o 74 ,6 coin/nya4 ,o Y— / / Gni!�,e�,J j�7L el-706:J,0 41196ePD�y lidd/�� ScLoA L o�c s are re-a-:74 ces5,�-7`s ,�a �v7L`i cs z�y�/s a�� ✓�s/ /zs Cczr� anal do eo 'ov cvan 'A t�o s�� 77J�sc ,�ss�� /'evJ�u/r7 �Ro/no7Lea� -rl1,411s �,✓� a,✓v s�/f s��poRf-,�� 0 dost a- 6 2. What is it about the Parks & Recreation Commission that interests you? What qualities, experience and expertise would you bring to the Commission? / z&,kJC u�i7�h �ocA� C11f?!Z�//CS � 10 7'iccz� Gt/Jd ,JOh' - !U/// /Ca-1 C/U k5 �CL� ! /Id c Y7 m e- e'.o/n/n/.ss/,Q,J . ATi ,5C,lPEizp uJa A 7 17 /o 3. What role does parks and recreation play in maintaining a healthy city? 5 AOAf,41.1) A) 7�lG� l//7LA�7�/ o J /Ts C V/z c,v r �f�7ZKs AN �ccr�i��io,J /aA/o �� o,��lJ �o �u7yTCC ��A,t1s /4N D Z�EAs Coln"nl SS/40, O /JA� SSc�S Oc��Til`A/� Supplemental Questionnaire Parks & Recreation Commission Page 2 4. How would you see your role as a member of the Commission? A .�a A�� 7i,s /.5 g.eJ ,9,dd'(509i -Posl7Zio,) -IILV 7ie- 1'�e// 17-1� MgMdeg6 SCn1IC At" !�1tvvscm6 Qi' 77J4, Cl r O ,;F"y M i vu.dzp�D1,1P 1/loXe A ilz/Z OA1 AC (,OA1A/15.51'O,J 14.)/74 Z ,97,616 A9 ///G- �CcIBCA//�JA/ .+/�'4�AS at //'G' 0'/' -72�;6 /S 4A) �4;Ppo, 141KO P1516oAI �1A dcr5�tdas CoeJ�rJd"r�`j ola�i e:9�iv J 74a eoIn In/ss/v� 6y 6x,�y,.v9 Ale2;) /DNAs 7''o f�G CDMA!/;SiO c> z y�e,s•o�. 5. In your opinion, what are Atasca�a/dero's greatest public recreation needs? ...� 6��v� �R.� cc�c�' ,r�a�17 T� /�% /,r��D Zc c�L=/�t"�o•c� ,c��s -�aZ D-� C'// c3-ge5 cLs spa')/c/ �e ��,/ted/� �o� ;��op/ o QSys ,�o as� $io 1)VX, 146 f v/n Alycy 7-1e' C'!7 4L-e-cls TD � D ofrejCL�r cO dvz 22 s eAc as mod OV/ P14Sy6--X 714A) ovz. AX11,s a-rc✓ ciZFc ,tJdrsO VO �0/'D//J D /�5 S 6. What methods should be used to fund Atascadero's public recreation programs and J facilities? (� / / 5c R 4CC.5 NGG.P 74o (fit-leo tr4 A1/� C3 �c/,411 /t� / /1f 0 L✓Co.�o/n/G Goc�.Di�io,v Quiz Ci� -Meas, �F /�e��i�sas ARc'�o�" Q, -RD2o//4R 60ifec74 w/741 /e Nod M 42e-A ,6u7' 7/r- e/1,i e•?•✓_/�o� /1 Ti,c�urs �`o a D .9 FK /mac s 771.*7- // JO�lcITL� /OG�� sexalce, &01,5 70 /S�otlSoX l�Dd�/j y�t'7L/d!T/C5 GJoU�d �Da� /ji✓o7G/1�'Z O�T/o'`)� Supplemental Application Parks & Recreation Commission Page 3 7. If appointed, what specific goals would you like to see /the Commission achieve? / 1415 -�r /rl Al G lo/Z!!Lyie, !,t>O[>! yoiv4 /f ��1�eX V' - 1,5 -F'4/zks cv-��cxc.� a.� ��,o /,48 &QA) o a ly la-PPa•J Z,OLA! CI& IS c�eoti/om/CCL t S OVA)e. a)00 le% To s ?2;-' OBJ,- Zoo a-'VO /��//,v,J d�Co� a-f�Xof�t�l/r ✓Cs� xc� ct,vv �.nl� Movit7�c�.J lcrcoyr.� G� Z�=i4/.7�y 8. If there is additional information you would like to share about yourself, please use the following space provided (optional). :7 x,o7 o x)e' o-�- tAtf #/zee fovIL).o/A)g int• ��es o d9' Z12116r ( 701z"� 6 60,6 4tdo 4of5 o/1 TKA A7�sc.51.dzWa 141� iZy4v�AGh Avys 7c" �J� TZo�r-, ow f7 as o.�� 7 40 ?,4741 /«k� al- /Xc, �i4Rk -tu4tZcznD ino.��a� Jo.cJ�tl�'t> 76cN�LS 1 hereby certify that the foregoing informatiorl is rue and correct. Signature: Date: Please return to: CITY CLERK QQ� 6500 Palma Avenue ��$� e'& JUN 3 '�7� Room 208 i 1913'.q 1979>-; Atascadero, CA 93422 = ; OF ATASCADERO CITY CLERK'S OFFICE W.L 6A.4- c .w CITY OF ATASCADERO k BOARD, COMMITTEE & COMMISSION APPLICATIONS Please Note: You must meet the minimum qualifications of being a registered voter and resident of the City, with the exception of youth representatives who are not required to be registered voters. Minimum qualifications are subject to verification. Please fill out and attach the Supplemental Questionnaire for the advisory body you are applying for. NAME: RESIDENTIAL p�� Arv i `61151ADDRESS: 0 �,d�'LC��./�-� Home Phone: l&(0 MAILING ADDRESS (if different): Work Phone: Are you a resident of the City of Atascadero? _ How Long? Are you a registered voter? Yes_ No_ Social Security No. 5. 2Z-2-q-/O£(7 OCCUPATION: �cl�� 01-A� EMPLOYMENT: Present or last employer's name, address and phone number: Position held and length of employment: EDUCATION: RELEVANT TRAINING, EXPERIENCE, CERTIFICATES OF TRAINING, LICENSES OR PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION: This application and supplement are "public documents" and are available for review upon request. ';Applicants are advised they may be requested to file a Statement of Economic Interest, pursuant to the Fair Political Practices regulations. Information will be provided by the City Clerk. Board, Committee & Commission Application Page 1 INVOLVEMENT IN COMMUNITY, VOLUNTEER, PROFESSIONAL AND/OR ACADEMIC ORGANIZATIONS: A / / / J&U47t'c� J/),5 x-tee'�-- "t i's 4DJ OTHER CITY COMMISSIONS, COMMITTEES OR BOARDS PREVIOUSLY OR CURRENTLY SERVING ON: r r How did you learn about this vacancy? Newspaper Article ✓ Newspaper Ad _ Community Group Word of Mouth Library City Hall Place of Employment Other (specify): Please complete the attached supplemental questionnaire. Feel free to attach a resume or other information about yourself. I hereby certify, under penalty of perjury, that the information on this application and attached • supplement are true and correct. Signature: ' / Date: k14-1 7 Board, Committee & Commission Application Page 2 S CITY OF ATASCADERO SUPPLEMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION 1. Please explain why you would like to serve on the Parks & Recreation Commission. az� a, ao, 44Dw-i, /l/ 61 2. What is it about the Parks & Recreation Commission that interests you? What qualities, experience and expertise would you bring to the Commission? L4 1 4- 4,,t J -�v �1 GL Lciy� jo'.Lh-L' � �ri''lt�"�1�7'Z,��!`/`�',•`d. J 3. Vypat role does parks and recreation play in maintaining a healthy city? 67 • Supplemental Questionnaire Parks & Recreation Commission Page 2 4. How would you see your role as a member of the Commission? 47 61w 10m�rv' � 4elo::6- 5. In your opinion, what are Atascadero's greatest public recreation /needs? AF fa T 6. What methods should be used to fund Atascadero's public recreation programs and facilities? Af zl G��o •Supplemental Application Parks & Recreation Commission Page 3 7. If appointed, what specific goals would you like to see the Commission achieve? 04 t ZgL�— Ulf 8. If there is additional information you would like to share about yourself, please use the following space provided (optional). 1 hereby certify that the foregoing information is true and correct. Signature: Date: lP�a�97 i January 20, 1997 I am a parent of 5 children, ages 4 through 14. I have a great interest in my community and feel that I can help to develop new and improved ideas as well as add creativity to the current programs of the City's Park and Recreation Department. I have been in San Luis Obispo County since 1972. I was raised in San Luis Obispo. I went to local schools including Cuesta College. I have lived in the North County since 1987; in Atascadero since 1988. My family loves Atascadero. We often have the feeling that this community is like one big family. My children attend four different schools, San Benito, Atascadero ,junior High, and Atascadero High School, with my youngest attending Cabbage Patch Preschool. I am currently a Teacher's Aide at San Benito and I am very active at all my children's schools. Up until the birth of my youngest child, I worked in the legal profession for several years and worked in advertising for the county's largest newspaper for six years. In this position I worked closely with many members of the business community. I have been PTA President and have held other positions at each school as well as serving on the 24th District PTA, currently as Vice President. As President of the Atascadero junior High School PTSA last year, I helped implement the County's first Drug Free Zone. The junior High received the California Distinguished School Award, due in part to the Drug Free Zone. I am generally pleased with our community and schools, but, as with all communities, we are not without our weaknesses. There are many things that could be done in this community that will not only provide entertainment and activities for our citizens, especially our children, but will also bring revenue into the city. I realize that funds are limited at this time, but hopefully we can help to improve that situation. Our children our the future. Recently, I had the opportunity to listen to some High School students speak about why kids turn to alcohol, drugs, etc. One of the main reasons (or I should say excuses) was that a there was never anything to do. While there is always something to do athletic in town, not all kids are interested or able to compete in athletics. There are also some families that cannot afford the costs. Society has raised this generation of children with an attitude that there should always be something for them to achieve. We know we need to get them away from TV and Video games, but what should and r what can we do to accomplish this? How can we help ouryputh to obtain the self-confidence and sense of responsibility that will enable them to achieve? Involvement in activities with other youth and with adults in the community is one way to help do this. I would like to bring some fresh ideas to the Parks and Recreation Commission. I like to think in terms of the future, and not'to stay "Status Quo". As we enter the 21st century, we must think of the majority of the population in Atascadero, our children. This is a real issue; our schools are overcrowded and these children need healthy activities and safe places to go with friends and family We can utilize • what we have here in Atascadero by adding new and improved ideas to old ones! I feel that I can not only come up with ideas but I can make them real; I can make than work. Thank you for your consideration. Maree Whitten • ' N�� 0 IIa0 � t� Please return to: i •1. . CITY CLERK 6500 Palma Avenue a a� V' e'�. •�'.` :.� APR 2 Room 208 loss 1997`9 R ia7e S Atascadero, CA 93422 ` CITY OF ATASCADERO BOARD, COMMITTEE & COMMISSION APPLICATION Please Note: You must meet the minimum qualifications of being a registered voter and resident of the City, with the exception of youth representatives who are not required to be registered voters. Minimum qualifications are subject to verification. Please fill out and attach the Supplemental Questionnaire for the advisory body you are applying for. NAME: 1 (1 f� Tb J2lA- b/5 RESIDENTIAL ADDRESS: �37� lJSS I-:-(- %�If�'A� Home Phone: y66�� 7 MAILING ADDRESS (if different): P 0. OCC Work Phone: 417-3-7rSz- �IG.Y� 'J Are you a resident of the City of Atascadero? yL How Long? "I y&"!47es. Are you a registered voter? Yes No Social Security No. 6- S(d-�b(o7Fib' OCCUPATION: 46,,47-eX -5y576MS e4lox ltE7E EMPLOYMENT: Present or last employer's name, address and phone number: LDp CZ GcJ/f i�� 7.��7gT/`.'7�-�T P L /9"icJ i •Position held and length of employment: W11 7-6-2fSYS%�i�s wO�eK�-r� z yt s EDUCATION: t'GZe- A)&)&-Z- 1-76711 T� / U�7L�tlr� C,010"I"UA) - /",4A)/9&,1A)C7 ';QA!f o04 0 Tiy.yTl-1fA)� RELEVANT TRAINING, EXPERIENCE, CERTIFICATES OF TRAINING, LICENSES OR PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION: / �' ^U6 6- S��z This application and supplement are "public documents" and are available for review upon request. Applicants are advised they may be requested to file a Statement of Economic Interest, pursuant to the Fair Political Practices regulations. . Information will be provided by the City Clerk. Board, Committee & Commission Application Page 1 INVOLVEMENT IN COMMUNITY, VOLUNTEER, PROFESSIONAL AND/OR ACADEMIC ORGANIZATIONS: �/DLu�vTc.� CDrto-ff �-iUt� /as%RuCiy2 �y� YOy'7"�`�' SPy.�7� . • 0/6TY Or— 5LO PA4Ks { /ZtZS t/DL047 UYe- A.)C, GFfI92I7Y 6t)L� Toy2•y�4MG7utg i4S %e,,ftsPdR..7if7id� C'Oc�2 rcJr4:0� DU2r.uG /492- cJSGr¢ vs oPL-x7 or loewu z /3LX'Cl�, OTHER CITY COMMISSIONS, COMMITTEES OR BOARDS PREVIOUSLY OR CURRENTLY SERVING ON: r How did you learn about this vacancy? Newspaper Article )( Newspaper Ad Community Group Word of Mouth Library City Hall Place of Employment Other (specify): Please complete the attached supplemental questionnaire. Feel free to attach a resume or other information about yourself. I hereby certify, under penalty of perjury, that the information on this application and attached • supplement are true and correct. Date: Signature: /Z3A � i Board, Committee & Commission Application Page 2 CITY OF ATASCADERO SUPPLEMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION 1. Please explain why you would like to serve on the Parks&Recreation Commission. After spending more than twenty years in San Luis Obispo County, the last fourteen as a resident of Atascadero, I wish to give something back to my community. 2. What is it about the Parks&Recreation Commission that interests you? What qualities,experiences and expertise would you bring to the Parks&Recreation Commission? I feel Atascadero needs opportunities to improve its community services programs. This might be more attainable with an enhanced economic base. The City's parks and recreational services should focus on revenue generating type programs while including a balance of community service type programs. As the former Regional Transportation Administrator for the County of San Luis Obispo during more than twelve years, I would bring to the commission an abundance of short and long range planning and program management experience. • 3. What role does parks and recreation play in maintaining a healthy city? By providing programs that prove to be self mipporting, the parks&recreation services would not be financially thwarted by less economically viable programs. Similarly, strong self supportive programs can offset expenses from less economically sound programs. It is important that recreation programs attract residents, not only from the city's population but from communities elsewhere. In this manner, the city becomes a popular destination where locals and tourists will recreate. These recreaters will likely shop in the city, thus generating sales tax revenue for the city. 4. How would you see your role as a member of the Commission? My education and work experience allow me to examine individual programs as they economically support themselves as well as other parks and recreation programs. My background as an administrator would be quite valuable in evaluating programs based upon their suitableness to the community as well as surrounding communities and tourism. 5. In your opinion what are Atascadero's greatest public recreation needs? The City currently possesses many recreational facilities. The issue is how to enhance revenue to help support programs, utilizing these facilities, which the community desires but suffer on the balance sheet. There is not one single greatest recreation need There are many recreational needs but only one economic need. Supplemental Application Parks and Recreation Commission Page 2 6. What methods should be used to fund Atascadero's public recreation programs amd facilities? I would not agree with the opinion that has been going around whereby the City's property owners would be levied in order to fund programs which are lacking adequate,financing. I would encourage changing the way in which under funded programs are operated. In addition, the programs should be supported by user fees. In my experience, market research, when conducted effectively, can provide the necessary information as to the viability of various current and future recreational programs. 7. If appointed,what specific goals would you like to see the Commission achieve? I would hope to see improvements in the community's economic position. The Charles Paddock Zoo needs to become financially sound in order to remain open. This doesn't mean shut it down. It mean, we need to change the way in which it operates. It doesn't need to generate a profit. It needs to begin traveling in the other direction, economically that is. The otherprograms, if self supportive, should continue but seek ways in which they can generate additional revenue in support of the entire parks and recreation department. 08. If there is additional information you would like to share about yourself,please use the following space provided(optional). In my private life, I've been instrumental in working as a volunteer with the parks and recreation department for the City of San Luis Obispo's youth programs. I've volunteered as a youth soccer coach and later as a referee. Asa player/manager I've guided winning men's and co-ed softball teams in several communities in the North County and North Coast areas. I've organized golf tournaments for sport and to benefit various charities. I would encourage programs that meet the desires of the non sporting citizen as well. I hereby certify that the foregoing information is true and correct. Signature: Date: • s I Please return to: CITY CLERK e:e�a w ew: .: `S FEB — 61997 6500 Palma Avenue r __�, • Room 208 ` i set*,`d Atascadero,CA 93422 Ci IY rFI m �J CITY OF ATASCADERO BOARD, COMMITTEE & COMMISSION APPLICATION Please Note: You must meet the minimum qualifications of being a registered voter and resident of the City, with the exception of youth representatives who are not required to be registered voters. Minimum qualifications are subject to verification. Please fill out and attach the Supplemental Questionnaire for the advisory body you are applying for. NAME: RESIDENTIAL ADDRESS: ADDRESS: �ODzs EI Ca VAI tt,v 1e•d Home Phone: q-101D -S�d?% MAILING ADDRESS (if different): Work Phone: Are you a resident of the City of Atascadero? / -r How Long? Z•© Y ee,J Are you a registered voter? Yes-,6 No Social Security No. z 5? -ZO^5 130 OCCUPATION: 122��we6 e�vu�m.` EMPLOYMENT: Present or last employer's name, address and phone number: 6A L F DV[y �� lieyGc t • C D• q�; a� Position held and lelength of employment: f P so,� r^s4 s 5 0 e- d e.5.k_) 1 0,LiA EDUCATION: RELEVANT TRAINING, EXPERIENCE, CERTIFICATES OF TRAINING, LICENSES OR PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION: This application and supplement are "public documents" and are available for review upon request. Applicants are advised they may be requested to file a Statement of Economic Interest, pursuant to the Fair Political Practices regulations. Information will be provided by the City Clerk. Board, Committee & Commission Application Page 1 INVOLVEMENT IN COMMUNITY, VOLUNTEER, PROFESSIONAL AND/OR ' ACADEMIC ORGANIZATIONS: �pV w� — / .�GK ut V u � �.uu r �iD U K cLl �l ave•. iv-L IL A447 OTHER CITY COMMISSIONS, COMMITTEES OR BOARDS PREVIOUSLY OR CURRENTLY SERVING ON: r How did you learn about this vacancy? Newspaper Article Newspaper Ad Community Group Word of Mouth Library City Hall Place of Employment Other (specify): Please complete the attached supplemental questionnaire. Feel free to attach a resume or other information about yourself. • I hereby certify, under penalty of perjury, that the information on this application and attached supplement are true and correct. Signature- Date: .7- 7lqZ _ • Board, Committee & Commission Application Page 2 CITY OF ATASCADERO • SUPPLEMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION 1. Please explain why you would like to serve on the Parks & Recreation Commission. �u c o u,c,► ► , Ct /� � i f t ��attctcf Pre ��<'r1 ��-tcceelt'{� F3 I k-R S-IGd i!�d d� 0 C"� � Jr c Lec tA. ICL, u 2. What is it about the Parks & Recreation Commission that interests you? What qualities, ,experience and expertise would you bring to the Commission?/ /r 5�Sa/�S N r cvr ccs . �s - -10 e sera 4,cd ae" !f4, �0 e-a 4 fs -�`G6:e— /,9c4L< j2eop'r- G 'Sat 3. What role does parks and recreation play in maintaining a healthy city? L s.�ZV IMtc. -� 1 IX>- CA IL /Vc�' Gti _ Supplemental Questionnaire Parks & Recreation Commission Page 2 4. How would you see yorur role as a member of the Commission? 0 C1 CJ VW,& (C.w c Xj4 1( VR-6 e"J 2,ct-L c J-4-`�ul 14 e 644f, �ets.cl' 5. In your opinion, what are Atascadero's greatestpublicrecreation needs? c+ — V [ - T"y t c • b m u s,G ( VJ �a K vd l l 'g'e� 6. What methods should be used to fund Atascadero's public recreation programs and facilities? 1 . Gc-v,�e-k-1 4 d9�� Imo, aS y &.L X10 3 . GV� YA-'ft�% k -y e z,moi awe ,t • SCCA/u ', P W, tit .kv ds t wv, Supplemental Application Parks & Recreation Commission Page 3 7. If appointed, what specific goals would you like to see the Commission achieve? Sc-e -ttf-- I ;a &L b a&U' - I(t�4 ale rte. ('0'0 UZ-V/ OJ-t e-e- he 1,cY 4- I 1. d LAA-5G.1r fed oma, k441- s -2 f� _ 8. If there is additional information you would like to share about yourself, please use the following space provided (optional). I hereby certify that th oregoing information is true and correct. Signature: Date: 2-13.01-2-13.03 CHAPTER 13. PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION Sec. 2-13.01. Established. There is created a Parks and Recreation Commission composed of seven (7) members. (Ord. 252 § 1, 1992: Ord. 101 § 4 (part), 1985) Sec. 2-13.02. Qualifications. The regular members of the Commission shall be qualified electors of the City. (Ord. 101 § 4 (part), 1985) Sec. 2-13.03. Members: Appointment: Terms of office. • The City Council shall appoint members of the Parks and Recre- ation Commission by a majority vote of the entire Council. There shall be seven(7)regular members of the Commission.Commencing February 1, 1997, one (1) member shall be appointed to a two (2) year term, which shall expire February 1, 1999; and two (2) mem- bers shall be appointed to a three (3) year term each, which shall expire February 1, 2000. Commencing February 1, 1998, two (2) members shall be appointed to a three (3) year term each, which shall expire February 1,2001;and two(2)members shall be appoint- ed to a four(4) year term each, which shall expire February 1, 2002. Thereafter, all terms shall be for four (4) years and shall expire on February 1 st, except those appointments made after the commence- ment of the term to fill a vacancy or removal, in which case the term of office shall be for the balance of the unexpired term. Vacancies on the commission occurring other than by expiration of term shall be filled in the manner established for appointments. All members _ shall serve at the pleasure of the City Council. (Ord. 292 § 1, 1995: Ord. 282 § 1, 1995: Ord. 268 § 1, 1993: Ord. 252 § 2, 1992: Ord. 209 § 1, 1990: Ord. 101 § 4 (part), 1985) • 85 (Arascadero 3-96) 2-13.04-2-13.08 Sec. 2-13.04. Ex officio member. A member representing the school district shall be appointed by the Mayor as an ex officio member of the Commission.The appoint- ee shall serve at the pleasure of the Mayor and without compensa- tion. (Ord. 101 § 4 (part), 1985) Sec. 2-13.05. Absence from meetings. Absence of a member of the Commission from three (3) con- secutive meetings, or from four(4) meetings during a calendar year, without formal consent of the Commission noted in its official minutes, shall be reported by the Recreation Director to the City Council for consideration of removal from office. (Ord. 205 § 1, 1990: Ord. 101 § 4 (part), 1985) Sec. 2-13.06. Organization. As of February 1 st annually, or as soon thereafter as is feasible, the members of the Commission shall elect a chairman and a vice- chairman,who shall hold office for one(1)year.The chairman shall preside over meetings, appoint appropriate committees, sign resolu- tions, and direct the affairs of the Commission. In the absence of the chairman, the duties of this office shall be performed by the vice- chairman. (Ord. 292 § 2, 1995: Ord. 101 § 4 (part), 1985) See. 2-13.07. Procedure. The Commission shall adopt rules and regulations to govern its procedures and shall set a time and place for regular meetings which will be held at least once a month. (Ord. 101 § 4 (part), 1985) See. 2-13.08. Quorum. A majority of the members shall constitute a quorum. (Ord. 101 § 4 (part), 1985) • (Amscadao 3-96) 86 2-13.09-2-13.10 Sec. 2-13.09. Secretary: Appointment: Minutes. The City Manager shall designate a secretary who shall maintain accurate minutes of the activities and official actions of the Commis- sion. If this person is a City employee, said person shall be compen- sated accordingly. (Ord. 101 § 4 (part), 1985) Sec. 2-13.10. Duties and responsibilities. The duties and responsibilities of the Parks and Recreation Com- mission shall be to: (a) Act in an advisory capacity to the City Council in all matters pertaining to parks and public recreation and to cooperate 86.1 (Atascaadera 495) RESOLUTION NO. 43-97 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA, APPOINTINGTHREE (3) MEMBERS TO THE CITY'S PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Chapter 13, Title 2 of the Atascadero Municipal Code establishing the City's Parks & Recreation Commission; and WHEREAS, there does exist three (3) expired terms; and WHEREAS, public advertisements soliciting interest in appointment to the Parks & Recreation Commission have been published, distributed and posted; and WHEREAS, the City Clerk did receive five (5) applications for consideration; and WHEREAS, the City Council did, on June 10, 1997, interview and consider five applicants and did then vote for specific nominations. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Atascadero does resolve to appoint the following citizens to a four (4) year term each expiring on February 1 , 2001 : On motion by Councilperson and seconded by Councilperson , the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ADOPTED: ATTEST: CITY OF ATASCADERO By: Marcia M. Torgerson, City Clerk Ray Johnson, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL Meeting Date: 6/10/97 CITY OF ATASCADERO 5:30 p.m. ';Interview Session Through: Robert Grogan, Interim City Manager From: Marcia M. Torgerson, City Clerk SUBJECT: Interview for Building and Construction Board of Appeals. RECOMMENDATION: 1) Interview and consider the candidates. 2) Select, by ballot, one citizen for appointment. 3) Adopt Resolution No. 45-97 formalizing the appointments. BACKGROUND: There is one vacancy that was created by the resignation of Kenneth Lerno following his election to the City Council. The opening is for a Specialty Contractor, and said term is due to expire in April 1998. The City Clerk has solicited applications from the members of the public pursuant to State Law. DISCUSSION: Two applications were received and interview times have been established for each candidate. It has been verified by the City Clerk's office that both of the applicants are residents and registered voters in the City of Atascadero. Attachments: Interview Schedule 2 applications Municipal Code Title 2, Chapter 12 Draft Resolution No. 45-97 INTERVIEW SCHEDULE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION BOARD OF APPEALS Tuesday, June 10, 1997 - 5:30 p.m. Club Room 5:30 - Barbara Butz 5:40 - Gail Kudlac 5:50 - Maree Whitten 6:00 - Richard Randise 6:10 - George Beatie 6:20 - COUNCIL VOTES 6:30 - Jim Melvin 6:40 - Steve McManus 6:50 - COUNCIL VOTES Please return to: •!` .int—`�-- ^. � Li? � � � ;' CITY CLERK ..: 6500 Palma Avenue ra7e> Room 208 9 I la 4 t t Atascadero, CA 93422 CITY OF ATASCADERO BOARD, COMMITTEE & COMMISSION APPLICATION' Please Note: You must meet the minimum qualifications of being a registered voter and resident of the City, with the exception of youth representatives who are not required to be registered voters. Minimum qualifications are subject to verification. Please fill out and attach the Supplemental Questionnaire for the advisory body you are applying for. (- NAME: RESIDENTIAL _ ADDRESS: /020,5- 0—LI, %�!C}-` r� ''� Fn-, - Home Phony: 7 MAILING ADDRESS (if different): Q.wi a WorkPhone: 4(06-1&q,8. Are you a resident of the City of Atascadero? U e S' How Long? Are you a registered voter? Yeses No_ (J Social Security No. -74= 6 9 OCCUPATION: EMPLOYMENT: v ` Present or last employer's name, address and phone number: 1 ODS C7(- (� r) / 4'-b-Co - IfV Position held and length of employment: EDUCATION: RELEVANT TRAINING, EXPERIENCE, CERTIFICATES OF TRAINING, LICENSES OR PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION: This application and supplement are "public documents" and are available for review upon request. Applicants are advised they may be requested to file a Statement of Economic Interest, pursuant to the Fair Political!Practices regulations. Information will be provided by the City Clerk. q Board, Committee & Commission Application Page 1 INVOLVEMENT IN COMMUNITY, VOLUNTEER, PROFESSIONAL AND/OR ACADEMIC ORGANIZATIONS: / 7 �f� l �1J7 T?/'l Y LT'�)r4, r•� U OTHER CITY COMMISSIONS, COMMITTEES OR BOARDS PREVIOUSLY OR CURRENTLY SERVING ON: How did you learn about this vacancy? Newspaper Article Newspaper Ad _ Community Group Word of Mouth X Library City Hall Place of Employment Other (specify): Please complete the attached supplemental questionnaire. Feel free to attach a resume or other information about yourself. I hereby certify, under penalty of perjury, that the information on this application and attached supplement are true and correct. Signature: �/h �P �,! % Date: Board, Committee & Commission Application Page 2 CITY OF ATASCADERO SUPPLEMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE BUILDING & CONSTRUCTION BOARD OF APPEALS 1. Please indicate which position you are applying for: ❑ General Contractor 0 Specialty Contractor ❑ Design Professional ❑ Member-at-Large 2. Please explain why you would like to serve as a member of the Board. i /0 Ql(rz� C 'o a 1\P1-co 1 t i.r- /6tJ_i 3 What qualities, experience and expertise would you bring to the Board? �C(C- - 4. What do you think is the purpose of the Uniform Building Code? KL-Ap P 010 '-'t. SG4P,a. g-Q C. vaU c Supplemental Application Board of Appeals Page 1 a 5. What is (the difference between.shall and may as it applies siin_.the Uniform Building Code? Sk n,�0,(1.4��J 4(l'r 4/3 4l Cr 4(4 N (? 0-t {�l LCI O 6. If there is additional information you would like to share about yourself, please use the following space provided (optional). I hereby certify that the foregoing information is true and correct. j�. Signature: 1'1 //(X�c`:(,� 1, Date: 1-21- 97 Supplemental Application Board of Appeals Page 2 Please return to: CITY CLERK \ 6500 Palma Avenue FEB FEB - 61997 i teta'. F: .' R' la7a ;' w Room 208 � Atascadero, CA 93422 CAD d ' 3 CITY CLERK'S OFFICE CITY OF ATASCADERO BOARD, COMMITTEE & COMMISSION APPLICATION Please Note: You must meet the minimum qualifications of being a registered voter and resident of the City, with the exception of youth representatives who are not required to be registered voters. Minimum qualifications are subject to verification. Please fill out and attach the Supplemental Questionnaire for the advisory body you are applying for. { NAME: C RESIDENTIAL �-�--tY"A� ��V �� ADDRESS: � �� c �� .(fP Home Phonies MAILING ADDRESS (if different): , Work Phone: Are you a resident of the City of Atascadero? How Long? JC k Are you a registered voter? Yes_ No Social Security No. OCCUPATION: -Jot— 9051 EMPLOYMENT: Present or last employer's name, address and phone number: Position held and length of employment: EDUCATION: Cr,-1 r ca ( RELEVANT TRAINING, EXPERIENCE, CERTIFICATES OF TRAINING, LICENSES OR PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION: , This application and supplement are "public documents" and are available for review upon request.'; Applicants are advised they may be requested to file a Statement of Economic Interest, .pursuant to the Fair Political'; Practices regulations. Information will be provided by the City Clerk. Board, Committee & Commission Application Page 1 INVOLVEMENT IN COMMUNITY, VOLUNTEER, PROFESSIONAL AND/OR ACADEMIC ORGANIZATIONS: OTHER CITY COMMISSIONS, COMMITTEES OR BOARDS PREVIOUSLY OR CURRENTLY SERVING ON: n� How did you learn about this vacancy? Newspaper Article Newspaper Ad _ Community Group Word of Mouth Library City Hall Place of Employment Other (specify): - >I t_ ,r�� E ".►4�►C>c� Please complete the attached supplemental questionnaire. Feel free to attach a resume or other information about yourself. I hereby certify, under penalty of perjury, that the information on this application and attached supplement are true and correct. Signature: Date: Board, Committee & Commission Application Page 2 CITY OF ATASCADERO SUPPLEMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE BUILDING & CONSTRUCTION BOARD OF APPEALS 1. Please indicate which position you are applying for: ❑ General Contractor 4 Specialty Contractor ❑ Design Professional ❑ Member-at-Large 2. Please explain why you would like to serve as a member of the Board. 1 ww 1A 1 &P- more I01161WA to v 3 What qualities, experience and expertise would you bring to the Board? n + y6e.�- <yLki- t ,ocy D icyif j A a llco.J CM 1 f 4. What do you think is the purpose of the Uniform Building Cod ? l� G.- MBIN t Supplemental Application Board of Appeals Page 1 5. What is the difference between.shall and may as it applies ' the Uniform Building Code? 6. If there is additional information you would like to share about yourself, please use the following space provided (optional). %� - m'- YL, r� 1 e/ end CQ C-inrnQMIP I hereby certify tha the foregoing information is true and correct. Signature: Date: b Supplemental Application Board of Appeals Page 2 STEVEN I McMANUS 7925 Marchant Avenue Atascadero, CA 93422 (805)466-8387 WORK HISTORY 1992 to Present Southwest Electric, Atascadero, CA Owner/Operator Electrical contracting, specializing in commercial and industrial applications, including reviewing plans and job cost estimating; contracts; engineering; consultation and construction; energy management calculations; and computer- room power and distribution. 1990 to 1992 Christopher Electric, Agoura Hills, CA Foreman Electrician Responsible for running day-to-day operations of company at various commercial/industrial job sites, involving scheduling of personnel, equipment and supplies to complete the electrical distribution system for each project; average length of project: six to eight months. 1986 to 1990 Tri-County Electric, Agoura Hills, CA Journeyman/Foreman Electrician Troubleshooting and repairing electric circuits and equipment in industrial, commercial and residential environments; motor control wiring; calculating circuit, motor and building load demands for single and three-phase systems. 1985 to 1986 Conejo Electric, Newbury Park, CA Journeyman Electrician Performed tasks outlined by the Foreman/Supervisor relating to the completion of the required electrical distribution system within commercial buildings[i.e., run pipe (conduit); pull wire; make up boxes; set trim, etc.]. EDUCATION 1993 to 1996 California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA Bachelor of Science Degree to be awarded June, 1996 Major: Electrical Engineering Special Area of Study: Power Analysis, Control and Distribution Graduated June, 1996; G.P.A.: 3.19 1992 to 1993 Cuesta College, San Luis Obispo, CA Undergraduate studies in Electrical Engineering. 1989 to 1992 Moorpark College, Moorpark, CA Undergraduate studies in Electrical Engineering. 1983 to 1985 L.A. Trade Tech. College, Los Angeles, CA Apprenticeship: Study of fundamentals in A/C electrical systems. CERTIFICATIONS/AFFILIATIONS April, 1996 E.I.T. (Engineer-in-Training) Exam passed 1995 Volunteer Recognition Award -City of Atascadero 1992 to Present Member of San Luis Obispo County Builders Exchange 1991 to Present Member National Electrical Contractors Association (NECA) 1991 to Present C-10 (Electrical) California State Contractor's License 2-12.01-2-12.02 t CHAPTER 12. BOARD OF BUILDING APPEALS Sec. 2-12.01. Established. (a) In order to conduct hearings to determine the suitability of alternate materials and methods of installation, and to provide for reasonable interpretations of the provisions of this Code, there is established a Board of Appeals. The Board shall consist of five (5) members, two (2) of whom shall be general contractors, one (1) of whom shall be an architect or structural engineer, one (1) of whom shall be a specialty con- tractor, all of whom shall be qualified by experience and training, and one (1) of whom shall be a member of the public who is not one of the foregoing. Members of the Board of Appeals shall be appointed by and serve at the pleasure of the City Council. The Building Official of the City shall serve as secretary ex officio to the Board. (b) In order to be eligible for appointment to the Board, the person shall live within the City. Terms of initial appoint- ment shall be for a term of two (2) years for two (2) members, for a term of four (4) years for three (3) members with four(4) year terms for subsequent appointments. Each member of the Board shall be required to comply with the applicable provi- sions of the Political Reform Act of 1974, California Govern- ment Code Section 81000, et seq. (c) The Board shall adopt reasonable rules and regula- tions, subject to approval and adoption by the City Council, for conducting its business which shall conform to the requirements of the Ralph M. Brown Act, California Government Code Section 54950, et seq., and shall render all decisions and find- ings in writing with a copy to the appellant. (Ord. 44 § 8.04.120, 1981) Sec. 2-12.02. Appeal procedure. (a) Any person aggrieved by a decision of the Planning 83 2-12.02 Department related to any manner within the purview of this title, shall have the right to appeal the decision. The appeal shall be filed with the Building Official within fifteen (15) business days after the rendering of the decision affecting the aggrieved person. Grounds for the appeal shall be set forth in writing. (b) The secretary of the Board shall set the time and place for a hearing on the appeal, and notice of the hearing shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation and shall be given to the appellant by mailing it to him, postage prepaid, at his last known address, at least ten (10) calendar days prior to the date set for hearing. (c) Any written reports to be made to the Board shall be filed with the secretary of the Board and shall be made available to the Board and to the public no less than three (3) working days prior to the date set for the hearing. Any depart- ment head shall have the right to be heard on any matter coming before the Board. (d) The decision of the Board on the appeal shall not become final until ten (10) working days after the Board has made its determination in order to allow time for an appeal to be made to the Council from the Board's decision. (e) Any party aggrieved by the determination of the Board shall have the right to appeal its determination to the Council. Such appeals must be filed with the City Clerk within ten (10) working days after the Board has made its determina- tion. (f) The Council shall set appeal fees to the Appeals Board and to the City Council by resolution. There shall be no charge for city-initiated appeals. (Ord. 44 § 8.04.130, 1981) 84 RESOLUTION NO. 45-97 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA, APPOINTING ONE (1) MEMBER TO THE CITY OF ATASCADERO'S BUILDING & CONSTRUCTION BOARD OF APPEALS WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted Title 2, Chapter 12 of the Atascadero Municipal Code, establishing the City Building & Construction Board of Appeals; and WHEREAS, the Board consists of five members, two of whom shall be general contractors, one whom shall be an architect or structural engineer, one whom shall be a specialty contractor and one whom shall be a member of the public-at large; and WHEREAS, one term has become'vacant on the Board of Appeals leaving one vacancy to be filled by a Specialty Contractor; and WHEREAS, public advertisements soliciting interest in appointment to the Board of Appeals have been published and posted; and WHEREAS, the City Clerk did receive two (2) applications for the Specialty Contractor position; and WHEREAS, the City Council did, on June 10, 1997, interview two candidates for the Specialty Contractor position on the Board of Appeals and did then vote for specific nominations. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Atascadero does resolve to appoint the following citizen to fill the vacancy which is a four (4) year term expiring on April 1, 1998. On motion by Councilperson and seconded by Councilperson the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ADOPTED: ATTEST: CITY OF ATASCADERO By: Marcia M. Torgerson, City Clerk Ray Johnson, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney 9 "Cal fornia Special Olympics - Law Enforcement Torch Run Day' June 16, 1997 WHEREAS, our local law enforcement agencies contribute to the well-beim:of our community and our residents; and WHEREAS, Participation in Syecial Olympics contributes to the yhysical, social and psychological well-beim o f the developmentally disabled yartic'pants; and WHEREAS, syecial olymyics provides develoymentally disabled yartic'pant with the opportunity for successful experiences in sports which develoys confidence and builds a yositive self-image; and WHEREAS, originating in Sacramento, the torch for the calfomia Syecial Olympics state Games will yass through Atascadero as it moves through San Luis obisyo County on June 16th and 170i, . enroute to UCLA's Drake stadium on June 20th; WHEREAS, Representatives from all city law enforcement agencies within our county, the sheriffs Department, calfornia Highway Patrol, Calfornia Youth Authority, Calfornia DTartment of Fish and Game, Cal Poly Department of Public Safety, the District Attorney's Off ice, Capon is Men's Colony, and state Parks and Beaches will beyarti4ating in the torch run through San Luis obispo County. NOW, THEREFORE, I Ray Johnson, Mayor o f the City o f Atascadero, do hereby yroclaim June 16, 1997 to be "Special Olymyics Day" in the city o f Atascadero and urge all citizefts to give their suyyort to this unicluue and hohly beneficial yrogram which gives the developmentally disabled their best opportunity to experience athletic comyetition and share in a mainstream community event. RAY JOHNSON, Mayor city of Atascadero, Cagornia June 10, 1997 a Item: A .2 Meeting Date: 6/10/97 • ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING APRIL 16, 1997 6:00 p.m. Special Meeting The meeting was called to order by Mayor Johnson at 6:02 p.m. Councilman Luna led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL: Present: Councilmembers Clay, Lerno, Luna and Mayor Johnson. Absent: Councilmember Carden. Others Present: Marcia M. Torgerson, City Clerk Staff Present: Robert Grogan, Interim City Manager; Roy Hanley, City Attorney; Brady Cherry, Community Services Director; Geoff English, Recreation • Supervisor; John Neil, Assistant City Engineer. RESOLUTIONS: 1. RESOLUTION NO. 27-97 - Awarding a contract (Bid #96-05) to Madonna Construction Co., Inc. for the construction of the EI Camino Real Bikeway Project (Fiscal Impact: $445,322) [John Neil] (Staff recommendation: Adopt) A. Removal of two (2) native trees in conjunction with the EI Camino Real Bikeway project [Steve DeCamp] (Staff recommendation: Make findings per Attach. B & approve) 2. RESOLUTION NO. 28-97 -Awarding a contract (Bid #96-06) to AJ. Diani Construction Co., Inc., for the construction of the Traffic Way Bikeway Project (Fiscal Impact: $149,940) [John Neil] (Staff recommendation: Adopt) John Neil, Assistant City Engineer, provided staff report and answered Couhcil questions. PUBLIC COMMENT: None. Motion: By Councilman Luna, seconded by Councilman Clay to adopt Resolution No. 27-97. Motion passed by unanimous roll-call vote, 4:0. CC 4/16/97 Page 1 Motion: By Councilman Luna, seconded by Councilman Clay to adopt Resolution No. 28-97. . Motion passed by roll-call vote, 3;1, with Councilman Lerno voting no. STUDY SESSION: 1. SERVICE AND FUNDING LEVEL OPTIONS FOR THE ATASCADERO LAKE PAVILION [Brady Cherry] (Parks & Recreation Commission/Staff recommendation: Provide staff direction) Brady Cherry, Community Services Director, provided staff report. He explained the 4 concepts proposed, stressing the necessity of addressing the maintenance needs of the Pavilion. Lengthy Council discussion ensued with many questions asked of Mr. Cherry. There also was a lengthy discussion of the COP fund (Certificates of Participation). Councilman Lerno expressed his desire to keep the Pavilion as a community center for Atascadero. He went on to state that the need for maintenance could be filled by members of the construction field volunteering their services. Mr. Cherry responded by explaining that there is a Pavilion Clean-up Day scheduled on May 3`d (see Exhibit A). Councilman Clay stated that he felt the Pavilion must remain a community center but felt the fees need to be raised to help maintain the building. He also suggested that the Ranger House be used for a handyman's quarters. Councilman Luna said he also favored the community center concept. He also expressed concern that if the fees are increased too high, many fund-raising groups might be unable to afford it. Mayor Johnson asked if staff was aware of where all the development impact fees have gone. Roy Hanley, City Attorney, responded by stating that he is in the process of reviewing the development impact fees, as requested by Council, and should be able to answer some of the Council's questions in a few weeks. Geoff English, Recreation Supervisor, explained that the deficit account is $250,000.00. This was charged against the Pavilion back in approximately 1993; the Pavilion has paid all but $90,000.00 of that charge. He went on to explain that the COP is paid $32,000.00 per year from park impact fees and if it is able to continue to pay the $32,000.00 per year, it will be paid off in the year 2008. Councilman Luna asked if the original $250,000.00 charge went to the Pavilion. Robert Grogan, Interim City Manager, responded by stating that he is looking into that and other issues by going back through the last 5 audits. He hopes to have an answer soon. There was consensus of the Council for the Pavilion to continue to function as a Community Center/Social Hall and that the local service organizations should be encouraged to participate in a maintenance program. i CC 4/16/97 Page 2 Public Comment Lon Allan, 6815 Santa Lucia Road, Co-Chairman of Friends of the Lake Pavilion and Train Show fund-raiser, stated if the City increases charges to non-profit organizations, they will no longer be able to afford it. He went on to state that he saw nothing wrong with the City's General Fund supporting the Pavilion. Mr. Allan offered, as a representative of the Friends of the Lake Pavilion, to donate paint for clean up day. Georgia Lowder, wedding and event coordinator, stated that she has handled 70 weddings at the Pavilion. She went on to say that part-time, minimum wage employees are not adequate to service the needs of the public. Pastor Carl Billings, 8775 Junipero Ave., the pastor of Hope Lutheran Church, which is currently meeting at the Pavilion, expressed his support for the Community Center Concept and stated that if it wasn't for non-profit groups, Atascadero would not be the community that it is today. Dave May, 13700 Morro Road, Board President of the Atascadero Education Foundation, stated that he supports the Community Center concept. He said that the Council shouldn't raise the rates; $10,000.00 deficit is not much for the Pavilion. He went onto say that a maintenance budget needs to be in place. Jim Williamson, 10615 Realito Ave., wanted to express his support for maintaining the non- profit fee structure at the Pavilion and also the Community Center concept. He is a member of RAMS who meets at the Pavilion once a month. He stated that RAMS will have to move their meetings if the rates go up at the Pavilion. Marge Mackey, 5504 Tunitas, commented that the Pavilion is an important asset to Atascadero. She went on to say that if we must pay for the Pavilion out of the general fund, so be it. Bill Zimmerman, 6225 Lomitas, thanked Councilman Clay for coming to the Planning Commission meeting and for his comments at that meeting. He expressed his agreement with all four Councilmembers as to the future of the Pavilion. Howard Gaylord , 8940 Curbaril, said that the Pavilion was built for the city;:and we shouldn't expect it to pay for itself. He recommended that the Council should look to volunteer help for maintenance of the Pavilion. George Beattie, 10025 El Camino Real, Space #8, former president of the Zoological Society, stated that the Zoological Society invested between $12,000.00 - $13,000.00 in revamping the Ranger House. He explained that the rooms are being used as offices and meeting spaces for various groups; every room is being used regularly. He also suggested that the City should make sure that fees are fixed; don't let public negotiate special rates. Councilman Clay asked about the use of the Ranger House. Geoff English responded that all the rooms are rented regularly and if it were rented as an apartment, it would eliminate bathroomlaccessibility for the Zoological Society. Rush Kolemaine, P.O. Box 1990, asked if the Zoological Society pays rent for the use of the Ranger House. Brady Cherry responded that they do not pay any rent, however, they donated $35,000.00 to the zoo this past year and in the past have donated as much as $50,000.00. He • went on to say that they have also raised untold amounts of money for other capital improvements in addition to their donations and have put in thousands of hours in volunteer service. Mr. Kolemaine also expressed his support for the Pavilion as a conference facility and CC 4/16/97 Page 3 local social event facility. Georgie Arnold, 4935 Vida Ave., urged the Council to keep an open mind about the best use of the Ranger House. She recommended that the Council should consider the educational program at the Zoo and its potential to generate income; it will need a facility. --end of public testimony-- Mayor Johnson asked the Council for direction to staff. Councilman Luna expressed pleasure that the Council and public unanimously agree that the Pavilion remain as a Community Center/Social Hall. The balance of the Council agreed. Brady wanted confirmation that the budget recommendation of$30,000 instead of$10,000 was also agreed upon by the Council. The Council agreed that it would be reviewed at the upcoming budget hearing. Mayor Johnson asked staff to draft a letter that will reflect the costs of the needed repairs and maintenance of the Pavilion. He stated that this letter will be signed by him and sent to every non-profit group and every organization in the community that uses the Pavilion. The letter is to say that these items are needs that the City has to keep the Pavilion in good condition; and if these needs can be met through these organizations, we will be able to keep the fees down. The entire Council agreed with the Mayor's suggestion. Mayor Johnson adjourned the meeting at 8:17 p.m. to the next scheduled meeting on Tuesday, April 22, 1997, at 7:00 p.m. MINUTES RECORDED AND PREPARED BY: Marcia M. Torgerson, City Clerk _ - ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A Pavilion Clean-up Day flyer CC 4/16/97 Page 4 rrAr6}} ,{a{.. {av'�kow}}}}-}}•:t•}}}:$•>}}}}•}:•:o:{pio:u-:;•.•r}:•};},:x.{tisa?}}:}}};;-}i}r;;::;}:-;}}:;.}:•:{-}ii} n. i... } ......... •:.J Nf '•:f `.•••.rr:'-•r•'��r rr2 ..tet' ".{.....{::::::::.::::::.�};:::::::::::::.:�:::•$:.'•:•:-}:.}:�•:::::::::. '%r•`:x Si- ?' ±>l'i$$$$$$$$��$$:??•}'r:^}$$Y `}'C}$$ii{$'�Y-$$$$$:??{iii:{i$$$:?�$}`•:%:=:ry}};-:;y=3}}}'r ,.'} t%>L.yrr.•-. � .yf 3f > •'J ..y:;.;.,r• `i ;';:?-:{y:.;t. ..1:,::. .::�2t{. ,-:-?:%�: i+;;?:•:yc:%:i}-.:; ::.c..: f.L:$,{• ,tri;::..•y,c:- }:fir.:$:$:.?>>:�•r`$ %><::>;> ri-:� �rrr.4rrr}1S/ r. J.$ rfr., }4.v.:{+. :vf.{...n.:.;.:-.:}::.x};>.$:.';{'r'�'?:v+::$:C�$::i>:i?:i{•-.{.$ Y��v�+r J 1�a}$rr„k�Yfn✓.r.nry}.vM'`fir'r'$+riiti?�:{:$:r':':�::?i�$:'iiiiT$>}$}iiv::..rr.rrrrv:.r.,.rrvr....,:.:..r:::.rv:::.vvvrfi„racj{n(�'�};;},iU: }�x �. -..sem! • - - � - � .p.' ':f ;ry J:.Jffit. 1 1 �t �� s•+i. k Ohl fi s� { {; J his fyN // ✓/ 1 fF 6 y? ?fit:?`^f l':'� • / / • �rr�i`�if f i+ $ r.<:f'Y•:. r+:F:rrr:y y;ry .rr: nr'r. rri/r” l / }' i1'.':t{'r':}>:•: 1.,r.A ,f rY:;•?:;:_:$$..?{--•:: .,.f:.. :?;%:L: ��k.l:r:r:/, •r.'. 'J ,f{{{:- •- ri/�,/'l"/%ylrfinr{:;fN f1i�rJh ,•':/.•.,: r f/ 1.•,;..r;y/.`.' hr!.......•::r� ,u l.,•fJ i'i:,,.{ J a�;rr J rr./J�:-: f%r..,Jir;+'fJ}J •:.ir.:y.y r•:/•;.{../..... ' .H l. .-::}:%-�+t•-'xr;�'SYh.' .�:A`'`? :S{/��f+``ry,.,'l..•:}i} "uif;f,.{%:r j%.:..:.;• �,�,y�. ... �i' •}{ri%%ff! Jf ff.. rr h'r rir syr::}ir ::jl.}fi'i y Y{�, f .+ .7' .'c+." r r•.r:..,f.;..;.../...;',{Il, � %+� ?F'. rfT•:fyrf'f,<t?t>...{.r�.f�'W:,f�l..rrr_.rri./r'%>f{��f,.r rt ll�i:'.•:.:i•:r�{•,i�>W -:l•: u ,:.:.'.'.. t :rR.f. rG�r,f+`i}' fc�.Gfrx!rjoo-}3ir�iliSir'rrlvf/frfi.}: g.5{; fh:r.:}i:..•.�-:r.}rr��yr�,w• r,rr rrrrJ,v>,,•••?%�i:>?•::rrr •r'1 REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item: A-3 Through: Robert F. Grogan Meeting Date: 06/10./97 Interim City Manager File Number TPM 96001 Via: Steve DeCamp, Acting Community Development Director r From:W1 Doug Davidson, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Consideration of Final Map #96001 to subdivide one 6.55 acre parcel into three lots of 10, 500, 6, 850 and 6, 850 square feet each. Subject site is located at 4055 El Camino Real. (Grummitt/Volbrecht Surveys) RECOMMENDATION: Accept Final Parcel Map #96001 . BACKGROUND: On July 9, 1996 the City Council considered the above- referenced map on their Consent Calendar. The City Council approved Tentative .Parcel Map 96001 based on the Planning Commission' s recommendations and the Findings and Conditions of .Approval . All conditions have been met by the applicant and the Final Map is ready to record. ATTACHMENT: Parcel Map cc: David Grummitt Volbrecht Surveys • 000001 ATTACHMENT C .... .. CITY OF ATASCADE Z RO c_s�n�"a '� "'•—' _ TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TPM 96001 DEPARTMENT r `A` S VICINITY MAP , S/ Ivor ro se" >�Pf.SAMSM PLLKOAO.0100 rr POAO S..P tovftm Vow NOTES \C \ \ O 6 �.! / C HS VAMW S MW C A��AIMS-.M, AMO rO ArASCAMPO CCLW)r SA r rK+v aSaCr POW j"j-W-_,S � APC BOM LW-PLorfA f. VV � 10� TENTATIVE PARCEL IAP NO. AT 96-022 \ •a4 P Bowe A A.l WN Lr Loa nA A[ s ,ssA sm Or M-c ArASCAP[Pa.W rK an a ArASCAWl4 RTMn Or SAM LNs MSY4 sulC Q'CAfArMNA AS JW-OY~BCMKYO N ` S BUx 4 PACE sJA a'YAP$ S a / Vlt�LBRECHT 40so SURVEYS \ /S SCALC.r'.ao tOT 7MK TMB so.4 Lt SAM L66 Ltl2>4 G#31W (OV)70 gm ALM'L K4BmYr Lt S1O/(tlP.*-Jo-") c OAT.•A-B-S( M¢.IJ-OT t ' S 000002 ,'� REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL iCITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item: A-4 Through: Robert F. Grogan Meeting Daae: 06/10/97 Interim City Manager File Number TPM 92004 Via: Steve DeCamp, Acting Community Development Director r From: Doug Doug Davidson, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Consideration of Final Map #92004 to subdivide one existing lot of 1 . 34 acres (gross) into two parcels of 0.55 and 0.50 acres (net) for single family residential use. Subject site is located at 8785 Atascadero Ave. (Johnson/Central Coast Engineering) RECOMMENDATION: Accept Final Parcel Map #92004 . BACKGROUND: On May 26, 1992 the Cit Council - y considered the above-referenced map on their Consent Calendar. The City Council approved Tentative Parcel Map 92004 based on the Planning Commission' s recommendations and the Findings and Conditions of Approval. All conditions have been met by the applicant and the Final Map is ready to record. ATTACHMENT: Parcel Map cc: Alice Johnson Central Coast Engineering • 000003 ATTACHMENT C '- TENT. P/;RC.- cif CITY 1 U IAP ,�. �.•. :... . F ATA.SCADERO TPM 92-004 8785 ATAXSCADIT20 AVENUE CAM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT JOHNSON/CENTRAL COAST DEPARTMENT 0 cl I l C "Z IM•1` �t L ~ rIt Y� - v-tea♦v+, > r�1�� I � t I Q CIS N•Li.li44N • �� iii�0'LM19 4w \ 1� (i49tilsw)1XV4 ♦ r M • / tit s n I o low -�,�q • �, M•w•fit �_� 000004 REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item: A-5 '? Through: Robert F. Grogan Meeting Date: 06/10/97 Interim City Manager File Number TTM 89014 Via: Steve DeCamp, Acting Community Development Director From:ve�Doug Davidson, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Consideration of Final Map #89014 to subdivide a portion of two existing lots (13. 9 acres total) into 23 parcels of 'one-half acre each for single family residential use. Subject site is located at 8625 Atascadero Ave. (Iverson/Central Coast Engineering) RECOMMENDATION: Accept Final Parcel Map #89014 . BACKGROUND: On February13, 1990 the Cit above- referenced y Council considered the above referenced map on their Consent Calendar. The City �Council approved Tentative Tract Map 89014 based on the Planning Commission' s recommendations and the Findings and Conditions of Approval . All conditions have been met by the appl-cant and the Final Map is ready to record. ATTACHMENT: Tract Map cc: Clark Iverson Central Coast Engineering • 000.005 I �� rawr✓r r .. -. CITY • ATASCADERO TENTATIVE TRACT MA.0 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TTM 'I4-89 DEPARTMENT Cit...► I .. ;. '3 ''~'tom �- • ; � a 1, El C3 ILE sit ••!O !'—' Q fir' 1!still • 11 1 �`, ' t"� //ff tii�"".��/ �F •�A O ,`• ! Ar In .. ' r-� (� -„ �k `�•'`J 1, `� F �- g �r r• -�• / i ��• . � �• � it• •�� .,..�!i , , 000006 i • REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item: A-6 Through: Robert Gorgon,City Manager Meeting Date:f' June 10, 1997 From: Brady Cherry,Director of Community Services SUBJECT: Agreement between Steve Robinson,D.V.M.of El Camino Veterinary Hospital and the Charles Paddock Zoo for animal health care services. RECOMMENDATION: Approve Resolution#46-97 approving an agreement between Steve Robinson,DVM of El Camino Veterinary Hospital and the Charles Paddock Zoo fpr veterinary services at the zoo. BACKGROUND: For the past 4 or 5 years,Dr.Robinson has donated his time for the veterinary care needs at the Charles Paddock Zoo. These services have been very valuable to Sthe zoo,especially in light of the zoo's limited budget. Dr. Robinson has shown an interest in exotic==animal medicine and spends considerable time consulting with other exotic medicine specialist. In an animal emergency Dr.Robinson has always responded quickly. There are times,however;;when routine visits or preventative procedures are postponed because of scheduling conflicts with Dr.Robinson DISCUSSION: During its regular 5 year review,the Accreditation Commission ofthe American Zoo and Aquarium Association (AZA)determined that contract for animal care was necessary. The Commission was very complimentary of Dr. Robinson's dedication,but felt a formal agreement with Dr. Robinson was necessary to provide more consistent animal health care. • Although,Dr. Robinson's many hours of service to the zoo is to be commended. There are times when routine procedures are scheduled for zoo animals and then cancelled because of conflicts with Dr. Robinson's business. This may mean animals have been fasted,kept off exhibit and extra staff scheduled for the procedure. The zoo's animal health care plan would also be enhanced if there were time to tour the zoo and discuss animal behavior,dietary,or medical problems in&more relaxed atmosphere. This agreement provides just compensation for regular,routine visits with Dr.Robinson There are also provisions for paying Dr. Robinson for emergency calls. By approving this agreement we are not asking his to take valuable time away from his own practice. FISCAL IMPACT: Funding($15,000)for this agreement was approved in the Fiscal Year 1996-97 budget. This will allow the zoo to pay Dr. Robinson for his time. There will be some savings for drugs and supplies now charged to El Camino Veterinary Hospital which we should be able to obtain on our own Attachments: Agreement for Veterinary Services 6/21/89 00000'7 AGREEMENT FOR VETERINARY SERVICES • THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of , 1997,by and between , hereinafter referred to as"CONTRACTOR", and the"City of Atascadero", a municipal corporation of the State of California, 6500 Palma, Atascadero, CA 93422, hereinafter referred to a"CITY". TERMS AND CONDIITONS 1. TIME FOR COMPLETION The services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall be completed on or before 11998. 2. CONSULTANT INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR agrees that CONTRACTOR is an independent contractor, and not an employee of CITY. CONTRACTOR shall not subcontract any of the services required, unless approved by CITY as terms of this agreement and listed hereunder. CONTRACTOR agrees that no representative of City has made or can make any promises, statements, or representations which state or imply that Contractor is hired or retained under any terms other than as an Independent Contractor and • exempt from City's personnel system. Contractor agrees that no agreement can impliedly arise that Contractor is employed under any terms other than as set forth above. CONTRACTOR'S status as an Independent Contractor exempt from City's personnel system may only be changed, revoked, amended, or superseded by a written document, signed by CONTRACTOR and the Mayor following approval by the City Council. 3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Veterinary services for the Charles Paddock Zoo. 4. SCOPE OF SERVICES For and in consideration of the hereinafter stated payment by CITY to CONTRACTOR, CONTRACTOR agrees to perform, at its own cost and expense, the following: A. Serve as primary medical officer for the zoo facilities and collection. B. Serve as caretaker of all drugs, narcotics, pharmaceutical equipment. CONTRACTOR also will administer or supervise the administration of narcotics, pharmaceuticals, and pharmaceutical equipment to the animals in the zoo collection. • 000008 3 • C. Provide a comprehensive program of preventative and curative medical care for the entire animal collection. D. Consult with Zoo staff and make recommendations regarding the nutritional needs of the collection. E. Visit the Zoo facilities and examine the animal's health and sanitation on r average of four times a month. In addition to treatment of ill or injured animals, services may include necropsy of deceased animals, simple laboratory procedures and tests,vaccinations and other procedures as required. F. Assist the General Curator and Registered Veterinary Technician in establishing and maintaining complete medical history records for each animal in the collection. G. Approve the detailed report of medical treatment administered and other services performed at each visit which is prepared by the RVT, and return a signed copy for the zoo files. H. Exercise their best professional judgement and practice and make their . best efforts to maintain the animals and facilities and advise zoo staff on maintenance of same so as to insure the best living conditions possible for the collection. I. Provide telephone consultation, advice and instructions of prescriptions, on a reasonably unlimited basis, either with staff or other veterinarians we may employ. J. Provide a signature as our consulting/attending veterinarian, for necessary and required certificates, licenses or permits. K. Advise on ordering medicine, supplies or instruments. L. Obtain at own cost,medical malpractice insurance. 5. RESPONSIBILITY OF CITY In order to assist CONTRACTOR in execution of their responsibilities under this agreement and to enhance the care of the animals in the collection, the CITY agrees to do the following: A. Maintain a locked pharmaceutical cupboard for the storage of all • controlled drugs and narcotics. 000009 B. Maintain a facility for use in the surgery and/or treatment of the collection S with recovery and holding cages, and related equipment as necessary at the Zoo.- C. Provide CONTRACTOR with staff support from Zoo personnel. D. Purchase equipment, biological, drugs, narcotics, pharmaceuticals and/or other medical supplies upon request from CONTRACTOR. E. Provide staff assistance for the capture and treatment of animals. F. Provide staff treatment of specimens on telephone or written instructions from CONTRACTOR. G. Provide additional veterinarians,where advisable for emergencies, and for these services. H. Maintain diagnostic or treatment notes filed in our records by backup veterinarians we may employ, for the CONTRACTOR'S review or use. I. Pay for all outside laboratory expenses incurred as a result of CONTRACTOR'S supervision of animals in the collection. J. Pay all other expenses necessary for the care of the collection when • recommended by CONTRACTOR and approved by the Director of Community Services or his designated representative. K. Reimburse CONTRACTOR for the annually required TB test. L. City agrees to pay annual dues to the American Association of Zoo Veterinarians. Payment is to be in the form of reimbursement to the CONTRACTOR for the fee. 6. COMPENSATION CITY agrees to pay, and CONTRACTOR agrees to accept for said services a total sum not to exceed $15,000.00 dollars for all hours worked,travel and expenses. CONTRACTOR shall submit a detailed invoice for each portion of work performed as follows: A. The rate of Two hundred dollars ($200.00)for one visit per week. (Length of visit to be determined by zoo's animal care needs). B. Additional visits, when approved by the General Curator, in excess of the one visit per week will be compensated for at a rate of sixty dollars ($60.00)for the first hour and($30.00)for each subsequent hour per visit. • 000010 Payment by CITY shall be monthly, within thirty(30) days following receipt of said invoice for work performed during the preceding month, subject to CITY accounting procedures. 7. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS A. CONTRACTOR covenants that is presently has no interest, and shall not have any interest, direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with the performance of services required hereunder. B. CONTRACTOR will not discriminate against any employee, or applicant for employment,because of race, color,religion, sex, marital status, or national origin. CONTRACTOR will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, color,religion, sex, marital status, or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to the following: employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer, recruitment, or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation, and selection for training, including apprenticeship. C. This agreement may be terminated by either party upon thirty(30) days written notice of termination. 8. HOLD HARMLESS CLAUSE CONTRACTOR agrees to indemnify and hold harmless CITY, its officers, and employees, from any and all loss or damage, and from any and all suits, actions and claims filed or brought by any person or persons, however caused, arising out of CONTRACTOR'S negligent performance or failure to perform, any and all things necessary to and required to be done by CONTRACTOR, pursuant to the specifications in this Agreement. • 000011 IN WITNES WHEREOF,the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the date and year first above written. ATTEST: CITY OF ATASCADERO, a municipal corporation of the State of California Marcia Torgerson Ray Johnson Clerk of the Council Mayor APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: "Contractor" Steve Robinson, D.V.M. Roy A. Hanley City Attorney Employer ID#(Social Security Number for Individuals only) Corporate No. 000012 • RESOLUTION NUMBER 46-97 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA,AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH STEVE ROBINSON,D.V.M.I' FOR VETERINARY SERVICES AT THE CHARLES PADDOCK ZOO The City Council of the City of Atascadero, California, hereby resolves as follows: 1. The Mayor is hereby authorized to execute an agreement with Steve Robinson,DVM for veterinary services at the Charles Paddock Zoo. 2. The City Manager is hereby authorized to make minor corrections or'modifications of a mathematical or clerical nature. 3. The City Accountant is hereby authorized to appropriate funds, if necessary;release and expend funds; and issue warrants to comply with the terms of this agreement. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Atascadero, held on the I& of June, 1997. ATTEST: CITY OF ATASCADERO MARCIA M. TORGERSON, City Clerk RAY JOHNSON, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney 000013 i • REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL Meeting Date: 6/10/97 CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item: A-7 Through: Robert F. Grogan, Interim City Manager Via: /),*--Steven L. DeCamp, Acting Community Development Director From:If# Kelly Heffernon, Administrative Analyst SUBJECT: A resolution approving the participation in the Central Coast Recycling Market Development Zone (CCRMDZ) RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt Resolution No. 44-97 approving the participation in the CCRMDZ BACKGROUND: At the May 14, 1997 Board Meeting of the San Luis Obispo County Integrated Waste Management Authority (IWMA), the Board accepted the compromise offered by the California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB) on membership in the CCRMDZ . The advantages of membership are described in the attached staff report to the IWMA Board. To become a member of the market development zone, each City in the County must adopt a resolution stating their intent to be a "Participating Jurisdiction". Currently, the Counties of Monterey, San Benito, San Luis Obispo, and Santa Cruz, and the Cities of Hollister and Watsonville are members of the CCMDZ. FISCAL IMPACT: None. Encl: Resolution No. 44-97 Report to the San Luis Obispo County Integrated Waste Management Authority 00O014 RESOLUTION NO. 44-97 • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO CLARIFYING APPROVAL OF THE PARTICIPATION OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO IN THE CENTRAL COAST RECYCLING MARKET DEVELOPMENT ZONE WHEREAS, the California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 (A.B. 939) and companion legislation designed to promote recycling market development have established a Recycling Market Development Zone Program for the State; and WHEREAS, the success of State-wide implementation of the California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 is directly related to the development of additional markets for post consumer waste materials; and WHEREAS, the Counties of Monterey, San Benito, San Luis Obispo, and Santa Cruz, and the Cities of Hollister and Watsonville made joint application on November 2, 1992, to the California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB) for designation of the Central Coast Recycling Market Development Zone(CCRMDZ); and WHEREAS, designation of the CCRMDZ was approved by the CIWMB`on August 25, 1993; and WHEREAS, the original application materials were not clear as to: the intent of the various jurisdictions to participate in the CCRMDZ; the authority of the co-applicants to apply on behalf of all jurisdictions;whether the jurisdictions agreed to the zone structure established at the time of application; and the geographical areas to be included in the CCRMDZ; and WHEREAS, the CIWMB finds it necessary to clarify these matters; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Atascadero, that: 1. The current waste management practices and conditions in the City of Atascadero are favorable to the development of postconsumer waste material markets; and 2. The designation of the City of Atascadero as a recycling market development zone is necessary in order to assist in attracting private sector recycling investments to the area. 3. The City of Atascadero hereby affirms its status as a participating jurisdiction within the CCRMDZ at the time of application for designation as a zone. 4. The City of Atascadero hereby affirms authorization given to the co-applicants to apply.to the CIWMB on behalf of the City of Atascadero. 0010015 Resolution No. 44-97 Page 2 5. The City of Atascadero hereby agrees to the zone structure established at the time of application for designation of the CCRMDZ. 6. The City of Atascadero hereby designates the entire geographical area within the City limits as part of the CCRMDZ. On motion by , seconded by the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: DATE ADOPTED: ATTEST: CITY OF ATASCADERO MARCIA M. TORGERSON, City Clerk RAY JOHNSON, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: ROY HANLEY, City Attorney 000016 ATTACHMENT A DATE: May 14, 1997 ITEM: 13 ❑ Approve ❑ Deny O'Continue to TO: Integrated Waste Management Authority FROM: William A. Worrell, Manager RE: Central Coast Recycling Market Development Zone (Action Item - Voice Vote) RECOMMENDATION Accept the approach described in the March' 18, 1997 letter from the CIWMB and direct the manager to forward a draft resolution to each Member City for approval. DISCUSSION Last year the Board directed the IWMA to become the representative to the CCRMDZ and to ensure that all Member Jurisdictions could participate in the CCRMDZ. Initially the State required a lengthy and expensive application process, after a series of meetings a compromise was worked out with the CIWMB.'The 6 Cities in the IWMA need to adopt.a resolution to be considered a member in the CCRMDZ. Benefits of joining the Central Coast Recycling Market Development Zone are: • Low Interest Loan Program a. Funding up to 50 percent of project cost, with a maximum loan of$1,000,000 for machinery.and equipment, working capital, land, and/or debt refinancing; b. Fixed, low-interest rates set semi-annually by the Board; and c.- Loan terms up to 10 years. • Assistance in business attraction, retention,expansion and job creation. • Promotion of market development for recycled products • Technical assistance for recycling businesses FISCAL IMPACT The IWMA will be responsible for the $3,000 per year annual fee. ATTACHMENT:_March 18, 1997 CIWMB letter .0 000017 13-1 s RECEIVED MAP 2 5 1997 Pete Wilson WaLIEPA "WPOA Governor. James M. Strock California Secretory jor Environmental March 18, 1997 Protection Environmental Protection, Agency - Integrated r Waste Management Dan DeGrassi Board Zone Administrator Central Coast Recycling Market Development Zone 8800 Ca!Center Dr. Sacramento Ca 9j816 CCunt'v of Santa Cruz - (916) 255-2200 Department of Public Works 701 Ocean Street, Room 410 Santa Cruz, California 95060 Dear Mr. DeGrassi: Several months ago, Mr. Bill Worrell, Central Coast Zone Coordinator, requested clarification on whether all the incorporated cities in the four county area be considered participants in the Central Coast Recycling Market Development Zone (CCRMDZ). Mr. Worrell cited several ''inconsistencies in both the zone designation process as well as information. provided through Board publications. In developing this response, my staff has carefully- reviewed the original application, and the other related documents for your zone. In addition, during the review of documents and development of this letter, staff worked very closely with the Board's Legal Office. The analysis. which I have described for you below, essentially reveals that in order to, provide certainty to each of the zone participants, the California Integrated Waste Management Board (Board) should clarify its original designation to remove any ambiguity that may exist around the inclusion of the incorporated cities. I believe the guidance provided in this.letter will provide a reasonable approach and resolution to this situation. Issues Relating to Inclusion of All Cities In reviewing the information, three issues arose around the inclusion of all the cities in the zone: ■ There was very limited information provided on the inclusion of the cities that were not considered as co-applicants. In support of . inclusion, certain parts of the application included brief refergnces to 0 frltd Paper 00018 13_2 Dan DeGrassi March 18, 1997 Page 2 the participation of all cities, and some of the cities' resolutions indicated clear intention to be part of the zone. On the other hand, there was no indication in any of the supporting documentation that the co-applicants were given specific authority to apply or act on behalf of the cities that were not co-applicants. ' ■ There appeared to be two levels of involvement for cities: 1) those designated as "Participating Jurisdictions" who were actively involved in zone activities, and 2) those that appeared to support the idea of the ' zone or lend some support to the zone but did not demonstrate specific .intent to participate in the zone. For the latter-group of cities, both their'. role in implementing the zone program and, more specifically, their relationship to the zone administrative body structure created by the 'MOU seemed unclear. ■ There was little information in the original application or on attached maps that clearly identified RMDZ areas for those incorporated cities who were not co-applicants. Method to Resolve Issues To clarify the issues relating to'cities that are not specifically identified as co- applicants, Board staff recommends that each of these cities adopt a clarifying resolution which includes the following; ' ■ A clear statement of their intent to be included as a "Participating Jurisdiction" in the zone as well as a statement that they agree to the established zone structure. ■ The designation of RMDZ areas, either by narrative description or mapping, for their jurisdiction. The Board's Legal Office has prepared a model resolution which could be used by the incorporated cities to expedite their process. Legal staff have also offered to explain to the cities the need forthese clarifying resolutions. I am also offering the support of the Zone Assistance section staff, as well as myself, in explaining the program and its benefits to the cities. Stens for Completing the Process Once all of the resolutions for the incorporated cities are adopted, please forward them to John Blue for further processing. Once received, they will be calendared for the next available Market Development Committee and Board meetings. These committee and Board items will serve to clarify the actual Dan DeGrassi March 18, 1997 Page 3 zone participants as of zone approval date. The earliest the item could be considered would be May, pending receipt of the resolutions and allowing sufficient time for processing the agenda items. This would seem an opportune time to clarify to the participants their role in` - the Zone now that the Legislature has extended the loan program through 2006, and sufficient funds are available for loans. This housekeeping action could quickly pave the way for additional jurisdictions in your four county area to benefit from the Board's RMDZ program. I look forward to working with.you.and your other zone partners in getting this issue clarified as soon as possible. If you have any questions or need any assistance, please call me at (916) 255-2320 or Mr. John Blue at (9.16) 255-2451. Sincerely, Caren Trgovcich, Deputy ctor Waste Prevention & Market Development Attachment: Model Resolution cc: Mr. Kurt Hunter County of Monterey Ms. Mary Whittlesey San Luis Obispo County Mr. Bill Worrell San Luis Obispo County Ms. Diane Sheeley City of EI Paso Del Robles Mr. Clay Lee _Cityof Hollister Mr. Richard Koch City of Watsonville Mr. Dan E. Holsapple SanBenito County Mr. John Blue, CIWMB COPY -000020 13-4 REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item: A-8 Through: Robert F. Grogan Meeting Date: 06/10/97 Interim City Manager File Number: ZC 96015 From: n Steven L. DeCamp Acting Community Development Director SUBJECT: Adoption of Ordinance No. 330 amending City' s Zoning Ordinance text to allow parking lots for adjacent commercial uses"`'.:. to be located within high density multiple family zoning districts as conditionally allowed uses. RECOMMENDATION• Approval and adoption of Ordinance No. 330 on second reading. BACKGROUND: On May 27, 1997, the City Council conducted a public hearing on the above-referenced application. The Council concurred with the Planning Commission' s recommendation and approved Ordinance No. 330 on first reading. /Ph Attachments : Ordinance No. 330 000021 ORDINANCE NO. 330 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO AMENDING SECTION 9-3.173 AND SECTION 9-4 .120 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT REGARDING THE CREATION OF AND STANDARDS FOR PARKING LOTS FOR COMMERCIAL USES LOCATED WITHIN MULTIPLE FAMILY ZONING DISTRICTS (ZC 96015; Niven) WHEREAS, the proposed zoning ordinance amendment is consistent with the General Plan as required by Section 65860 of the California Government Code; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendment is in conformance with Section 65800 et seq. of the California Government Code concerning zoning regulations; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendment will not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment. The Negative Declaration prepared for the project is adequate; and WHEREAS, the Atascadero Planning Commission held a public hearing on May 6, 1997 and has recommended approval of Zone . Change 96-015. NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Atascadero does ordain as follows. Section 1 . Council Findings . 1 . The proposal is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Element and other elements contained in the General Plan including the Economic Development Element. 2. The proposal will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. The Negative Declaration prepared for the project is adequate. Section 2 . Zoning Text. The Zoning Ordinance text is hereby amended by the addition of the language shown on the attached Exhibits A and B. 0c 0022 ORDINANCE NO. 330 PAGE 2 Section 3. Publication. The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published once within fifteen (15) days after its passage in the Atascadero News, a newspaper of general circulation, printed, published, and circulated in the City in accordance with Section 36933 of the Government Code; shall certify the adopting and posting of this ordinance and shall cause this ordinance and this certification together with proof of posting to be entered into the Book of Ordinances of the City. Section 4 . Effective Date. This ordinance shall go into effect and be in ';full force and effect at 12 : 01 a.m. on the 31st day after its passage. On motion by and seconded by , the foregoing Ordinance is approved by the following role call vote: AYES: NOES : ABSENT: DATE ADOPTED: By: RAY JOHNSON, Mayor ATTEST: MARCIA TORGERSON, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ROY A HANLEY, City Attorney PREPARED BY: 0 STEVEN L. DeCAMP, Acting Director Community Development Department 0,0002;3 Exhibit A Section 9-3.173. (k) is hereby added (new language shown in bold type) : 9-3.173. Conditional Uses: The following uses may be allowed in the Residential Multiple Family Zone. The establishment of conditional uses shall be as provided by Section 9-2.109 (Conditional Use Permits) : (a) Churches and related activities (See Section 9-6.121) (b) Schools (See Section 9-6.125) (c) Mobilehome developments (See Section 9-6.143) (d) Organizational Houses (e) Pipelines (f) Farm Animal Raising (See Section 9-6.112) (g) Retirement hotel (h) Bed and Breakfast (i) Skilled Nursing. Facility (See Section 9-6.134) (j) The following uses where established in a residential structure of historical importance: (1) Broadcasting Studios (2) Business Support Services (3) Libraries and museums (4) Offices (5) Personal Services (6) School-business and vocational (k) Parking Lots (see Section 9-4.120) ii60024 a Exhibit B Section 9-4. 120. is hereby amended as follows (new language shown in bold type) : 9-4 . 120. Off-Site Parking: (a) Where it is not feasible to provide sufficient on-site parking, an adjustment (Section 9-1. 112) many be grunted to allow the required parking to be located off-site provided that: (1) The most distant parking space is not more than 400 feet from the use; and (2) The site of the parking lot is in the same ownership as the principal use, or is under a recorded'; lease or similar agreement, with the use that provides that the parking will exist as long as the use it serves, unless the parking is replaced with other spaces that satisfy the requirements of this Title; and (3) The site of the parking is not located in a residential zone unless the principal use requiring the parking is allowable in a residential zone. Where any such principal use is subject to Conditional Us Permit approval, the off-site parking shall be subject to Conditional Use Permit approval. (b) -Where off-site parking is a conditionally allowed use in a multiple family zoning district, the following criteria and minimum design standards shall be applied: (1) The site for the proposed off-site parking shall be adjacent to the commercial use. (2) The off-site parking shall be maintained for employee use only and shall be supplemental to the normally required parking provided on the commercial site. (3) The off-site parking shall not be used to increase the density of commercial development normally allowed. (4) All vehicular access to the off-site parking area shall be from the commercial site. No access to the off-site parking lot shall be taken from a residential street. (5) A minimum of one-half (1/2) of the site shall be developed for residential use. The residential use shall be so situated that the off-site parking lot is not visible from the street. A minimum of one-half (1/2) of the allowable residential density shall be �lt)2S provided. (6) The residential portion of the site shall be developed prior to use of the off-site parking facility. (7) Site specific design standards such as landscaping, lighting, and security shall be established through the conditional use permit process. { 00002E REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: 6/10/97 CITY OF ATASCADERO AGENDA ITEMl: C-1 THROUGH: ROBERT F. GROGAN,INTERIM CITY MANAGE FROM: BRADY CHERRY,DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES r SUBJECT: Amendment to extend the Agreement and establish a new rate with Laidlaw Transit Services, Inc., for the provision of transportation services. RECOMMENDATION• Adopt Resolution No. 47-97 approving an Amendment to the Agreement between the City of Atascadero and Laidlaw Transit Services, Inc. for transportationservices. BACKGROUND The City's Agreement with Laidlaw Transit Services, Inc., for the provision of Dial-A- • Ride Services, expired in April, 1997. The City and Laidlaw have continued services on a month to month basis since that time. Laidlaw has provided excellent transportation services to the City since 1994. The proposed Contract Amendment reflects a 3% increase in the hourly rate and the fixed monthly rate. The increase is consistent with increases built into the previous Agreement with the City. The proposed Amendment allows for a one year extension of the current Contract(see Section 2(b)). The Contract contains a 60 day termination clause, if the City should be ready to issue a new Request For Proposals (RFP)prior to April, 1998. The Amendment will be effective June 1, 1997. FISCAL IMPACT: The Contract Amendment will translate into a 3% overall increase in Contract costs. Currently, the fixed monthly Management fee is $11,463. The rate increase will increase this fee by approximately$344 per month. The service billing hours each month vary, but average about $7,500 (868 hours) per month. Based upon this average, the dollar amount increase would be approximately$225 per month. The increase is budgeted for Fiscal Year 97-98, and can be absorbed by the Dial-A=Ride Budget for June of the current Fiscal Year. 00002'7 RESOLUTION NUMBER 47-97 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH LAIDLAW TRANSIT SERVICES, INC. r FOR THE PROVISION OF TRANSPORTATION SERVICES The City Council of the City of Atascadero, California,hereby resolves as follows: 1. the Mayor is hereby authorized to execute an agreement with Laidlaw Transit Services, Inc., for transportation services for the City of Atascadero's Dial-A Ride Program. 2. The City Manager is hereby authorized to make minor corrections or modifications f a mathematical or clerical nature. 3. The City Accountant is hereby authorized to appropriate funds, if necessary; release and expend funds; and issue warrants to comply with the terms of this agreement. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Atascadero, held on the 10th of June, 1997. ATTEST: CITY OF ATASCADERO MARCIA M. TORGERSON, RAY JOHNSON, City Clerk Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: ROY A. HANLEY, City Attorney 000028 FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ATASCADERO AND LAIDLAW TRANSIT SERVICES,INC. This First Amendment to the agreement between the City of Atascadero,herein referred to as "City"and Laidlaw Transit Services, Inc. (formerly known as Mayflower Contract Services), herein referred to as "Contractor"is being entered as follows: WITNESSETH WHEREAS, on January 7, 1994, the City of Atascadero solicited proposals for the operation of public transportation services; and WHEREAS, contractors submitted the proposal dated February 3, 1994, responsive to the request for proposals (RFP)provides such services in the method and manner and the cost set forth in the proposal; and WHEREAS, City has determined that contractor had the management and technical personnel, expertise, and other useful assets of sufficient quantity and quality to provide Atascadero with public transportation services; and WHEREAS, the subject RFP is attached to the agreement dated the 8th day of March, 1994 as Exhibit A in the contractor's proposal attached as Exhibit B and are by this reference made a part of this agreement; and WHEREAS, the contractor has provided quality operations management and services for the term of the agreement; initial term of the agreement from April 25, 1994 through and including April 24, 1997; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals and covenants and agreements of each of the parties, the parties do agree as follows: 1. Purpose: To extend the agreement for a one year period from April 25, 1997 through April 26, 1998 as allowed under the agreement herein refenced. Upon completion of this term, the City, at its sole discretion,may extend the term of this agreement for one additional year provided that the changes and the terms and conditions of the extension are'mutually agreed upon by both parties. 2. Price Formula. The City agrees to pay contractor for the performance of the service set forth as follows: (A) Payment of a fixed hourly rate per vehicle service hour of$8.91. Vehicle service hours will be calculated by using the time each revenue vehicle leaves the garage for its first scheduled point each day until such time as each vehicle returns to the garage at the end of each operational day and/or route. Time for driver meal breaks are specifically excluded from use in 000029 the calculation of a vehicle service hour. The hourly rate shall include operator wages, fringe benefits and indirect labor costs. (B) Payment offixed monthly rate of$11,807.00 will be paid to the contractor to compensate contractor for all work to be performed under this agreement as defined in Exhibit A, the request for proposal,agreement dated 8th of March, 1994, except that which is included under the above hourly rate of this amendment including,but not limited to, vehicle operators non-service wages; management's controllers wages; said employees fringe benefits and indirect labor costs; uniforms; report reproduction; office supplies;project telephone; all other related operational costs; and the contract fee. (C) In the event that the State or Federal government requires the contractor to provide for any form of medical,hospitalization, group health or any other form of health insurance, or increase in wages whether by mandate or by payroll tax or fee,then the City and Contractor may agree to renegotiate rates paid to contractor to allow contractor to recover the additional costs of this governmental mandate. It is agreed that all other terms and conditions of the original agreement shall remain in force. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to be executed by their respective duly authorized officers. CITY OF ATASCADERO LAIDLAW TRANSIT SERVICES, INC. By: By: Date: Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY By: Date: 000030 6/10/97 REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL Date: 5fQ-749-7- CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item: C-2 Through: Robert Grogan, Interim City ManagerASIAZ From: Brady Cherry0`birector of Community Services SUBJECT: Adoption of City Council Resolution No. 40-97 establishing an Arts in Public Places Policy for the City of Atascadero. '' RECOMMENDATION: The staff and the Parks and Recreation Commission recommend approval of the Arts in Public Places Policy attached. Staff further recommends that the City does not attempt to regulate art in public view on private property at this time. BACKGROUND: • Last year, the City Council considered several options for establishing an Arts in Public Places Policy. An Ad Hoc Committee was formed by the, Parks a4d Recreation Commission chaired by Commissioner Paul Hood. The Committee consisted of approximately 12 members (see attached list) . The Committee met several times and discussed at least flour different versions of a draft policy. The Ad Hoc Committee was unable to reach a clear consensus to recommend any given policy. Three different versions of Arts in Public Places were forwarded to the City Council for consideration. The proposed policy that is attached is the version selected by the City Council last year to be brought back for adoption for artwork located on public property. Draft policies "A" land "B were alternative versions submitted to the City Council previously (see attached) Essentially, the policy prescribes that proposed art on public property be reviewed by a five member subcommittee of the Parks and Recreation Commission using a pool of citizens drawn ';';upon from the local arts community. The subcommittee would make a recommendation to the Parks and Recreation Commission, and the Commission would hold a public hearing on the proposed artwork. The Parks and Recreation Commission would forward a recommendation to the City Council for a final decision. The item would be placed on the City Council's consent agenda, unless otherwise removed. '' 000031 This policy does not create a new standing body, committee or commission for public art, but utilizes the resources of . the existing Parks and- Recreation Commission and the Arts community. While a specific Commission or Committee for public art may be preferable, the City is not presently in a position to support a new and "legislative body" with the resources common to our public committees. The prior action of the City Council intended to avoid creating a new Commission or Committee for public art. The proposed policy does not encompass art on private property in "Public view" primarily because the City appears to have little legal authority to regulate art on private property. While many cities do have public policies for art on private property in public view such as murals, statuary, etc. , the Cities typically sponsor the artwork or require that new development set aside space for public art and so on. Atascadero is currently without leverage of this type. The City of Atascadero will probably not be commissioning nor requiring a "percent for the arts" nor the dedication of space anytime in the immediate future. Therefore, staff feels that regulating or reviewing public art on private property at this time is not necessary. While there may be many private property owners who wish to have public art on their property (such as murals, etc. ) , direction on content, materials, maintenance, etc. , is probably best left to the property owner. Any attempt to establish guidelines, review, etc. , is very likely unenforceable anyway. The City Attorney can clarify these issues should the City Council have questions. There has been much discussion about the City's Sign Ordinance and its perceived effect on art on private property, particularly murals. The Community Development staff has reviewed the Sign Ordinance for potential conflicts with public art programs, and has determined that there is no problem with the existing Ordinance. Murals and other public art are not prohibited under the present Ordinance. . Basically, if a mural or other public art does not constitute an illegal sign by having elements of advertising in its visual content, then public art should not conflict with the Sign Ordinance. Thus, the Community Development Department is not recommending any amendments to the Ordinance to address public art at this time. Last year, several versions of Arts in Public Places Policies were given to the City Council for review. These versions are attached for the City Council's reference. FISCAL IMPACT: None significant with the recommended Arts in Public Places policy. c:\Ellen\ArtPrk.BC iJO,0032 RESOLUTION NO. 40-97 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO; CALIFORNIA, TO APPROVE THE ARTS: IN PUBLIC PLACES POLICY FOR ART ON PUBLIC PROPERTY The City Council of the City of Atascadero, California hereby resolves as follows: r. 1. The Department of Community Services and the Parks and Recreation Commission are hereby authorized to implement the Arts in Public Places Policy for the City of Atascadero. 2. The City Manager is authorized to make any necessary procedural changes to implement the Arts in ''Public Places Policy. 3. The Finance Department is hereby authorized to appropriate funds budgeted to comply with the implementation of the Arts in Public Places Policy. PASSED AND ADOPTED at the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Atascadero held on the 27th of May, 1997 . ATTEST. CITY OF ATASCADERO MARCIA M. TORGERSON, RAY JOHNSON, City Clerk Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: ROY A. HANLEY, City Attorney C:\E11en\RES40-97.BC -OQ0033 CITY OF ATASCADERO ARTS IN PUBLIC PLACES I. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES The ultimate purpose of the procedures and standards set forth herein is to encourage appreciation, acceptance, and support by the public of visual arts in public places owned or leased by the City of Atascadero. Art is both a permanent and changing reflection of what the community holds important. The Arts in Public Places Policy should reflect and communicate community values and enhance the quality of life of the citizens of the City of Atascadero. The goals and objectives of the Arts in Public Places Program are to direct the inclusion of works of art in City capital improvement projects and public places, including City-owned or leased buildings and parks, to create a more livable City, engage and attract a wide spectrum of citizens and visitors, stimulate the vitality and economy of the City of Atascadero, and enhance the community environment. II. DEFINITION OF ART IN PUBLIC PLACES Arts in Public Places is defined as all art including, but not limited to, sculptures, murals, paintings, graphic arts, mosaics, photography, crafts, mixed media, and environmental works. It includes all artwork that is to be displayed longer than 30 days on or in a publicly owned or leased facility or park, or publicly owned or leased open space or easement. III. PROCEDURE A. Submittal to Community Services Department Works of art may be donated to, or purchased by, the City of Atascadero to be placed in publicly owned or leased property. Plans for proposed artwork and its placement must be submitted by the artist, or sponsoring group, to the Community Services Department. A standardized proposal application form will be required as part of the submittal package. It shall include sufficient data upon which to properly evaluate the project. A full-color rendering shall be submitted as part of the proposal. Copies of the application shall be transmitted for comments to all affected City Departments, including Community Development. 1 000034 B. Consideration by Atascadero Public Arts CoMmittee After the proposed application is deemed to be complete and comments have been received from all affected City Departments, it shall be forwarded to- the Parks and Recreation Commission. The Parks and Recreation Commission shall appoint a five (5) member ad hoc advisory committee from selected members of the Atascadero Public Arts Committee (see Item V. below) . This ad hoc committee should be selected from those most r knowledgeable about the art form, and shall be chaired by a non-voting member of the Parks and Recreation Commission. A project proposer shall not serve on this advisory committee. The approval or rejection of the project, together with suggestions for modifications by the sub-committee, will be received by the Parks and Recreation Commission at a regular or special meeting that shall be deemed a public hearing. Following the public hearing, the Parks and Recreation Commission will either recommend approval or rejection of the project, including recommendations for appropriate changes. If the project is recommended for rejection, specific reasons for the rejection should be communicated to the proposer. If the proposer agrees to the suggested modifications, it will be reconsidered by the Parks and Recreation Commission. The recommendation of both the APAC and the Parks and Recreation Commission shall be forwarded to the City Council. . C. Consideration by the City Council The City Council shall review the proposal, together with the recommendations of the Atascadero Public Arts Committee and the Parks and Recreation Commission, and approve, reject, or suggest modifications to the project. The City Council's consideration of the artwork shall be placed on the consent agenda, unless removed for separate action. If the project is rejected, specific reasons for the rejection shall be communicated to the proposer. If the proposer agrees to the suggested modifications, the proposal may be reconsidered by the City Council. 2 000035 IV. SELECTION STANDARDS The selection of works of art for the City of Atascadero, Arts in Public Places Program, shall be based on the following criteria: 1. Artistic excellence, innovation and originality. 2 . Appropriateness of the artwork in terms of scale, form, content and the environment. r 3 . Durability of the artwork relative to theft, vandalism, and the environment. 4 . Materials and methods shall be suitable for durable outdoor display. 5. The program shall strive for diversity in style, scale, ,media, and numbers of artists represented. 6. Selection shall be based on the compatibility of design and location within a unified design character or historical character of . site; preservation and integration of natural features of the project. 7 . Ability to maintain the project. A further requirement shall be the execution of an appropriate contract related to the rights and duties of the parties involved in the creation, display, maintenance and ownership of the completed artwork. V. ATASCADERO PUBLIC ARTS COMMITTEE (APAC) The Community Services Department will solicit membership from interested citizens of Atascadero to serve on an advisory committee to assist in the implementation of the Goals and Objectives. Members of this group may be asked to assist in the development of an inventory of sites for public art, provide leadership in the selection of artists and artisans, provide direction for funding public art, and serve as advisory members to the Parks and Recreation Commission on an ad hoc basis to consider and evaluate proposed public art projects. In this capacity, their expertise and advice would be considered in the development of a recommendation to the City 'Council. Recommended backgrounds for the members of the APAC are artist, art teacher, art historian, art collector, architect, landscape architect, or board member of a non-profit art corporation. 3 ,000036 Persons with pending art project applications shall not be allowed to serve on the APAC during the time their project is under consideration by the Committee. It shall be the function and purpose of the APAC to: 1. Review proposed project applications and implement selection standards. 2 . Set standards and procedures for the construction and maintenance of art in public places. Such standards are to be consistent with the requirements of the City general plan and land use element. 3 . Advise the City regarding the amounts and sources of funds to be expended on artwork. , 4. Advise and assist in obtaining financial assistance for visual art from private, public and corporate sources. 5. Survey available or potentially available sites on publicly-owned facilities and open areas within the City. 6. Assist in the establishment of appropriate themes for areas in the City along with general recommendations for size and placement of artwork in those areas. 7. Encourage and assist in community participation that promotes public involvement in the arts. CAPOLICYNARTPUBOBAEV 4 00003'7 CITY OF ATAS CADERO ART IN PUBLIC PLACES PROGRAM PROPOSAL APPLICATION Project Name Project Location/Address Developer Work Phone Property Owner Work Phone Artist Phone Address City State Zip Code Title of Artwork Media Description of Artwork Approximate Weight Dimensions Approximate Cost $ Location 'of Identification Plaque Description of Foundation Date of Installation Site Location Distance Between Public Street and Artwork Landscape Plans Special Problems Dedication Plans ** Enclose Artist background information and an Artist's rendering depicting several views of the artwork as located on the site plan, including the surrounding building and grade elevations and building facades. Also include one or more of the following formats: 1. 8"x10" photographs or 35mm slides depicting several views of the artwork. 2. A model of the artwork. 3. A graphic or artist's illustration depicting several views of the artwork. CAFORMMARTPUB.APP -000038 REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM: C-2 CITY OF ATASCADERO DATE: 01-23-96 THROUGH: Andrew J. -Takata, City Manager FROM: Brady Cherry, Director Department of Community Services SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF AN ARTS IN ';PUBLIC PLACES POLICY FOR THE CITY OF ATASCADERO. RECOMMENDATION• The Parks and Recreation Commission and Staff recommend the Policy identified as Draft "C" in this Report. REPORT OUTLINE: I. Introduction to Arts in Public Places Programs -Richard DeLong, Past President, San Luis Obispo County Arts Council (presentation). II. Consideration of draft policies for Arts in Public Places for adoption by the City of Atascadero. III. Provide Staff direction on Arts in Public Places with regard to private property. Issues: Type of approval process preferred, if any; aid modification or exemption from Sign Ordinance. IV. Clarification on City Council action to approve Pavilion Mural Project. I. PRESENTATION: Richard DeLong II. POLICY DEVELOPMENT BACKGROUND: Prior to the direction from City Council to develop an Arts in Public Places Policy for artwork on public property, City Staff had been meeting and reviewing potential policies and procedures for Atascadero with representatives from the San Luis Obispo County Arts Council. (Please see attached letter from Ms. Susan Beatie.) When the Pavilion Mural Project appeared on a City Council Agenda, the item moved to the Parks and Recreation Commission for policy development and recommendation. An Ad Hoc Committee was formed by the Parks and Recreation Commission, chaired by Commissioner Paul Hood. The Committee consisted of approximately 12 members (please see attached list). The Committee melt several times and went through at least four different versions of a draft policy. It was ultimately 000039 clear that no consensus of the Ad Hoc Committee could be achieved. Thus, two different draft policies were forwarded to the Parks and Recreation Commission for consideration. At the Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting on January 4, 1996, the two proposed policies were discussed. It was generally agreed. that the two policies had many similarities, but a couple of significant differences. Draft "A" was considered to be a policy designed to address Arts in Public Places on publicly owned or leased property only, as per Council direction, with the Parks and Recreation Commission playing a major role in screening artwork for non- aesthetic issues (such as maintenance, public safety concerns, consistency with facility master plans, public uses, etc.). An initial review would be conducted by a Council appointed Arts Committee subject to the Brown Act. Their recommendation on artistic merit, etc., would be forwarded to the Commission and then the City Council. Draft "B" is supported by at least six members of the Ad Hoc Committee. This draft is different from Draft "A" in that it encompasses both private property and publicly owned property, and eliminates the review by the Parks and Recreation Commission. In lieu of the Commission's review, Community Services Department Staff is relied upon to screen all issues that the Commission would normally address. The Council would appoint an Arts Committee that would be subject to the Brown Act and function as a "Legislative Body." The City Council would hold a public hearing and make a final decision on a proposed project. Draft "B" also includes a modification of the Sign Ordinance, which essentially creates a waiver for any type of mural or wall art that has been approved by the Arts Committee. Draft "C", which has been developed by George Beatie, Parks and Recreation Commission Chairman, is the proposed Policy being recommended by the Parks and Recreation Commission, Community Services Department Staff, and has the approval of a least a couple of the Ad Hoc Committee members. This version encompasses only public property at this time, but could easily be modified to include private property using the same review processes. This version does not create a new standing body, such as an Arts Committee/Commission; but rather a pool of people from the arts community would/could be drawn upon as needed to serve on a temporary, five member subcommittee of the Parks and Recreation Commission to review proposed artwork, and make a recommendation to the Parks and Recreation Commission. The Commission would hold a public hearing and weigh input from the community and Subcommittee. The Commission would then forward both the Commission's and the subcommittee's recommendations on to the City Council for a final decision. The item would be placed on the City Council's Consent Agenda, unless otherwise removed. 000040 DISCUSSION: There are many advantages and disadvantages of each of the three drafts presented. Some important considerations are: • Should the City's Arts Policy include public and/or private property? • Is the Policy and process "user friendly"? (not too cumbersome) r • Does the public have an adequate opportunity to provide input and participate in the process of decision making? At what point in the process is a public hearing held? • Who is involved in the screening and reviewing of proposed artwork for aesthetic value and artistic merit? This seems to be a very important part of the approval process. • Should the City create a Public Arts Committee/Commission?!; Are there adequate resources available to support such a body? Who should staff it? • What City Departments should be involved in the screeningprocess? • Are the standards for public artwork clearly defined in the policy? • Are the procedures and policies practical and manageable? • Does the process and guidelines set forth encourage public art in Atascadero? Given all of the above, Staff believes that Draft "C", developed and suggested at the Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting by Chairman Beatie, best suits the City's needs at this time. However, it should be noted that sooner or later the City must address the issue of public art on private property, and the implications on the Sign Ordinance if artwork, such as murals, are desired. A possible alternative to the three versions presented above, would be to adopt Draft Policy "C", but modify it to add four (4) new Commissioners from the arts community to the Parks and Recreation Commission. These four new members would be full voting members of the Commission, but would serve in an auxiliary capacity, only sitting on the Commission when items related to public art are considered on the Agenda. III. After the City Council decides on an Arts in Public Places Policy and Procedures, Staff would appreciate the City Council's direction on whether to pursue policy development for public art on private property, and the possible modification of the Sign Ordinance. 000041 IV Finally, there seems to be some confusion regarding the City Council's . action on the Pavilion Mural Project presented by Police Chief, Bud McHale. The Parks and Recreation Commission has requested clarification on the action that the Council took at the meeting. The project was apparently approved in "concept." Which parts of the proposed project were approved, and must the project come back before either the Parks and Recreation Commission or the City Council? Many people seem to have a different understanding of what has been approved. i. CACITYCOUN\ARTPUBLC.R" 000042 �" DRAFT A CITY OF ATASCADERO ARTS IN PUBLIC PLACES "DRAFT POLICY" L GOALS AND OBJECTIVES The ultimate purpose of the procedures and standards set forth herein' is to encourage appreciation, acceptance, and support by the public of visual arts in public places owned or leased by the City of Atascadero. Art is both a permanent and changing reflection of what the community holds important. The Arts in Public Places Policy should reflectand communicate community values and enhance the quality of life of the citizens of the City of Atascadero. The goals and objectives of the Arts in Public Places Program are to direct the inclusion of works of art in City capital improvement projects and existing public places, including City-owned or leased buildings and parks, to create a more livable City, engage and attract a wide spectrum of citizens and visitors, stimulate the vitality and economy of the City of Atascadero, and enhance the community environment. If. DEFINITION OF ART IN PUBLIC PLACES Arts in Public Places is defined as all art, including but not limited to,sculpture,murals,painting, graphic art, mosaics, photography, crafts, mixed media and environmental works. It includes all artwork that is to be displayed longer than 30-days on or in a publicly owned or leased facility or park, or publicly owned or leased open space or easement. III. PROCEDURE A. Submittal to Community Services Department: Works of art may be donated to or purchased by the City of Atascadero to be placed in publicly-owned or leased property. Plans for proposed artwork and its placement must be submitted by the artist or sponsoring group to the Community Service Department. A standardized proposal application form will be required as part of the submittal package. It shall include sufficient data upon which to properly evaluate the project. A full-color rendering shall be submitted as part of the proposal. Copies of the application shall be transmitted for comments to all affected City Departments, including Community Development. 000043 DRAFT -2- B. Consideration by Atascadero Public Arts Committee: After the proposal application is deemed to be complete and comments have been received from all affected City Departments, it shall be forwarded to the Atascadero Public Arts Committee(APAC). The APAC shall review the application,meet with the artist and sponsoring group, and make a recommendation to the City Council. The APAC shall review the proposed artwork for its appropriateness based on theme, artistic -excellence, innovation, originality, appropriateness of materials, size, and construction. A public hearing may be called at the discretion of the APAC. The APAC will either recommend approval or rejection of the project,including"recommendations for appropriate changes. If the project is recommended for rejection, specific reasons for the rejection should be communicated to the proposer. If the proposer agrees to the suggested modifications, it will be reconsidered by the APAC. C. Consideration by the Parks and Recreation Commission: Before presentation of. the recommendation of the APAC to the City Council, the Parks and Recreation Commission shall review the proposal application for location, impact on the public building or park, and overall theme and consistency with the goals and objectives of the Community Services Department and the City of Atascadero. A public hearing may be called at the discretion of the Parks and Recreation Commission. The Commission will not consider the aesthetics of the proposals and to the maximum extent possible will not duplicate the previous review by the APAC. The Parks . and Recreation Commission would either recommend approval or rejection of the project, including recommendations for appropriate changes. If the project is recommended for rejection, specific reasons for the rejection should be communicated to the proposer. If the proposer agrees to the suggested modifications, it will be reconsidered by the Parks and Recreation Commission. The recommendation of both the APAC and the Parks and Recreation Commission shall be forwarded to the City Council. D. Consideration by the City Council: The City Council shall review the proposal, together with the recommendations of the Atascadero Public Arts Committee and the Parks and Recreation Commission and approve, reject or suggest modifications to the project. The City CounciYs consideration of the artwork shall be placed on the consent agenda, unless removed for separate action. If the project is rejected, specific reasons for the rejection should be communicated to the proposer. If the proposer agrees to the suggested modifications, the proposal-may be reconsidered by the City Council. IV. SELECTION STANDARDS The selection of works of art for the City of Atascadero, Arts in Public Places Program, shall be based on the following criteria: 1. Artistic excellence, innovation and originality. _ 2. Appropriateness of the artwork in terms of scale, form, content and the environment. 000044 DRAFT -3- 3. Durability of the artwork relative to theft, vandalism, and the environment. 4. Materials and methods shall be suitable for durable outdoor display. 5. The program shall strive for diversity in style, scale, media, and numbers of artists represented. 6. Selection shall be based on the compatibility of design and location within a unified design character or historical character of site; preservation and integration of natural features of the project. 7. Ability to maintain the project. A further requirement shall be the complete execution of an appropriate contract related to the rights and duties of the parties involved in the creation, display and maintenance of the artwork- V. rtworkV. ATASCADERO PUBLIC ARTS COMMITTEE The Atascadero Public Arts Committee(APAC) shall be a community-based seven (7) member. The members of the APAC shall be appointed by the City Council and must be residents of the City of Atascadero. Members of the APAC shall serve four (4) year, staggered terms. Recommended backgrounds for the members of the APAC are artist, art teacher, art historian, art collector, architect, landscape architect or board member of a non-profit art corporation. Persons with pending art project applications shall not be allowed to serve on the APAC during the time their project is under consideration by the Committee. It shall be the function and purpose of the APAC to: 1. Review proposed project applications and implement selection standards. 2. Set standards and procedures for the construction and maintenance of art in public places. Such standards are to be consistent with the requirements of the City general plan and land use element. 3. Advise the City regarding the amounts of funds to be expended'on artwork. 4. Advise and assist in obtaining financial assistance for visual art from private, public and corporate sources. 5. Survey available or potentially available sites on publicly owned facilities and open areas within the City. 6. Assist in the establishment of appropriate themes for areas in 'the City along with general recommendations for size and placement of artwork in those areas. 7. Encourage and assist in community participation that promotes public involvement in the arts. : 000045 CITE' OF ATASCADE'RO DRAFT ART IN PUBLIC PLACES ,PROGRAM PROPOSAL APPLICATION Project Name Project Location/Address Work Phone Developer Property Owner Work Phone Artist Address City/State Zip Phone Title of Artwork Media Description of Artwork Approximate Weight Dimensions Approximate Cost Location of Identification Plaque Description of Foundation Date of Installation Site Location Distance Between Public Street and Artwork Landscape Plans Special Problems Dedication Plans **ENCLOSE ARTIST BACKGROUND INFORMATION AND NANAE ARTIST'S EN ERININCLUDING ITING SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE ARTWORK AS LOCATED 0 SURROUNDING BUILDING AND GRADE ELEVATIONS AND BUILDING FACADES. ALSO INCLUDE ONE- OR NEOR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING FORMATS: 1. 8" x 10" photographs or 35mm slides depicting several views of the artwork. 2. A model of the artwork 3. A graphic or artist illustration depicting several views of the artwork. 000046 a it DRAFTB 12/7/95 PROPOSED PROCEDURAL OUTLINE FOR ENCOURAGEMENT AND PROCESSING OF VISUAL ART ON PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF ATASCADERO GUIDELINES FOR APPROVAL OF SAME I. OBJECTIVE r The ultimate purpose of the procedures and standards set forth herein, is to encourage appreciation and acceptance and support by the public of visual arts in the City of Atascadero as well as to encourage and sustain artists and those working under their supervision for making contributions to the beautification and cultural enrichment of our community. II. PUBLIC VISUAL ARTS DEFINED Public visual art is defined as three-dimensional or other forms of artwork. It includes all artwork that is displayed longer than sixty days on or ins a publicly owned facility or park, or publicly owned open space or publicly owned easement. III. PRIVATE VISUAL ARTS DEFINED Private visual art is defined as all artwork displayed longer than sixty days on the exterior of any privately owned facility, building or open area, that is open to the public view. Artwork displayed in residential areas on private property, or within the interior of any commercial facility is excluded from this definition. IV. MODIFICATION OF THE SIGNING ORDINANCE The signing ordinance of the City of Atascadero would be modified by way of ordinance creating an exception to the signing ordinance for murals or forms of wall art and statuary that have been approved by the Atascadero Arts Advisory Committee (AAAC) or City Council, as appropriate, in accord with the course of proceedings outlined herein. This exemption removes the mural, wall art, or statuary from any signage review or application process. V. FUNCTION OF THE ATASCADERO ARTS ADVISORY COMMITTEE It shall be the function and purpose of the Atascadero Arts Advisory Committee to: ' 1. Advise the City in matters pertaining to the quality, quantity, scope and style of art in Public places and art displayed in areas open to public view. 2. Advise the City regarding the amount of funds to be expended on artwork, subject to municipal approval. 00004'7 3. Advise and assist in obtain financial assistance for visual art from private, public and corporate sources. 4 Review proposed artwork projects and implement standard procedures for such review. 5. Advise and assist private property owners who desire such advice and assistance regarding the selection and installation of art to be located on the property in the public view. 6. Act as liaison between local artists and public or private property owners. Z 7. Set standards and procedures for the maintenance and promotion of an inventory of meritorious works of art in the public view. 8. Encourage and assist in the development of community participation activities that promote public involvement in publicly displayed works of visual art. VI. COMPOSITION OF THE ATASCADERO ARTS ADVISORY COMMITTEE The AAAC shall consist of at least members.. At least one member shall be a licensed architect; at least two who are artists, teacher, historians or art collectors; at least two who are members of local art, mural or sculptural organizations dedicated to the support of the arts. The members shall be appointed by the City Council and shall serve a term of years on a staggered basis. VII. PROCEDURE Proposed works of visual art must first be submitted by the artist, property owner, or sponsoring group to the AAAC for review and approval of that particular form of art. The criteria for approval shall be: -Appropriateness of theme -Professional excellence 'Appropriateness of materials, size and construction Upon review of the proposed project, the AAAC would either approve or reject the project, including recommendations for appropriate changes. If the project is rejected, specific reasons for the rejection would be communicated to the proposer. If the project is approved with suggested modifications, and the artist agrees with those modification, it will be approved without further AAAC review. If the project is for display on private property, the determination of the Atascadero Arts Advisory Committee is final. The project would appear on the consent calendar of the City Council to insure that the necessary contracts and related documents are signed and to allow the the artist or someone objecting to the approved project to request the matter be pulled from the consent agenda. In the event that a project is to be displayed on or in a public building, or erected on property owned by the City of Atascadero, it would require review by the Department of Community Services or the department ultimately responsible for maintaining public areas, and a public hearing by the City Council. A standardized proposal form, acceptable to the AAAC and the City Council will be a required part of the submittal package. It shall include sufficient data upon which 000048 to properly evaluate the project. A full-color rendering shall be submitted as a part of the proposal. The AAAC or appropriate subcommittee will establish submittal criteria for three dimensional and wall art A further requirement shall be the complete execution of an appropriate contract related to the rights and duties of the parties involved in the creation, display and maintenance of the artwork. Vlll. MUNICIPAL STANDARDS FOR ARTWORK 1. The size and configuration of the artwork shall be appropriate to the view window, size and architectural features of the building or open area in or upon which it is displayed. 2. Method of construction/erection of the project shall be in accord with the standards established by the AAAC. 3. Materials and Methods shall be suitable for durable outdoor display. 4. The artwork must be either created or supervised by a professional in the field who's professional competence has been determined by the AAAC. The AAAC will review that artists portfolio, artistic credentials and other appropriate criteria. The project shall be of high professional quality and consistent with the theme adopted for the area of proposed placement. 5. Appropriateness of theme, method and style is admittedly a subjective criteria and it is to be applied by the AAAC in such a manner so as to encourage diversity among the artists as well as diversity of style. IX. THEME The Atascadero Arts Advisory Committee shall survey available or potentially available sites on public and private facilities and open areas within the City';of Atascadero. The AAAC shall establish appropriate themes for those areas along with general recommendations for size and placement of proposed artworks in those areas. No work of art shall incorporate any signage or subject matter that advertises any existing business. The project may include a graphically represented recognition plaque listing major donors of materials and/or financial sponsors. The plaque shall not exceed 24 inches in width or height and be confined to the colors of green and/or cream with white highlights, in a uniform style and lettering. The plaque shall also bear the creating or supervising artist's name(s). An exception to non-commercial advertising criteria shall apply in the Colony District of Atascadero as part of the promotion of the 1920's theme. Advertisements may be depicted in murals of businesses presently non-existent, but having existed during the time of the City's founding.and 1927 and of historical significance. Such murals will portray the logo or lettering style and composition of the original advertisement with reasonable authenticity. [ATASPUB.DOC] 000049 ---end of testimony--- The City Council received the report. C. REGULAR BUSINESS: With mutual consent, Mayor Highland moved up Item #C-2. (For Item #C-1, see page r 2. PROPOSED POLICY FOR ARTS IN PUBLIC PLACES FOR THE CITY OF ATASCADERO (Parks & Recreation Commission/Staff recommendation: Approve Alt. C & provide staff direction) Richard DeLong of the San Luis Obispo County Arts Council presented a slide show illustrating Arts in Public Places programs and spoke in support of adopting an "arts in public places" policy. Councilmember Luna asked the speaker how the City can avoid controversial art. Mr. DeLong noted that a public hearing at some point is vital and explained that it is incumbent upon the City to establish a streamlined local review process. Resident Susan Beatie, also of the County Arts Council, described County guidelines recently established. Brady Cherry provided background and the staff report. He explained that an ad hoc arts committee formed to make a recommendations relative to an arts in public places policy was not able to reach consensus on a single draft policy. He summarized three draft policies submitted and included in the staff report and noted that the staff's recommendation was Draft Policy "C". He requested direction from the Council and outlined key points for consideration: (1) whether or not the arts policy should cover public and private property, (2) will there be provisions to allow for public input, (3) shall a process for screening and reviewing be included, and (4) does the Council wish to create some type of an arts commission. Council discussion followed. Mayor Highland commented that a policy for arts in public places should deal only with publicly-owned property and asserted that property privately owned should be handled separately. He indicated that he was not in favor of appointing another committee or commission because it takes too much staff time and the City cannot afford it. The Mayor remarked that he would support an advisory ad hoc committee to advise the Parks & Recreation Commission on an as-needed basis as set forth in Draft Policy "C" and stated that any such committee should include members of the arts community and public at- large. He added that he does not feel it is appropriate for this type of committee to be chaired by a member of the Parks & Recreation Commission as is suggested. Councilmember Luna spoke in favor of adopting one policy for public and private property because it will ensure the same rules for everyone. He indicated support for Draft Policy C and suggested that a project, once it has been reviewed by an ad hoc committee of those knowledgeable in the arts, be set for a public hearing before the Parks & Recreation Commission. The matter, he suggested, could then CC 01/23/96 Page 6 000050 come to the City Council for final approval on Consent Calendar. Councilmember Carden mentioned that although he supports DraftPolicy "C", he does have a problem- with government getting involved with 'art on private property. Councilmember Johnson shared concern about how the concept of public art murals will be handled and expressed a desire to review what other cities are doing to address this issue. Councilmember Luna suggested that the City follow similar procedures that the County is already using and spoke' in support of adopting standards that will ensure that murals are produced with proper materials to avoid deterioration over time. Public Comments: Doug Lewis, Tunitas Avenue resident, asked how the seven 80-year old statues in Sunken Gardens will be treated in the arts in public places policy and wondered if there was some significant public art in the works. Baxter Boyington, ad hoc arts committee member, spoke in support of Draft Policy „B,. Susan Beatie spoke in support of Draft Policy "V'' and encouraged a policy for both public and private art. George Beatie, President of the Parks & Recreation Commission, verbalized support for Draft Policy "C" and clarified that the proposed non-voting member of the Parks & Recreation Commission serving as the chair of an ad hoc '!arts committee was for administrative purposes. He argued that community input can be afforded without having to establish another legislative body. Barbie Butz, Parks & Recreation Commissioner, also spoke in favor! of Draft Policy "C" as written. Joe Ramirez, ad hoc arts committee member and member of the North County Mural Society, noted that he supports a successful mural program and is currently involved with a project proposed for the Wilkins Printery building. He argued that Draft Policy "C" ignores the input of the ad hoc arts committee and urged the City Council to adopt Draft Policy "B". Robert Lilley, ad hoc arts committee member, also spoke in support of Draft B and emphasized the necessity of establishing an arts advisory council. In addition, Mr. Lilley advocated an exemption to the sign ordinance for public view;',:art. Rush Kolemaine, 4850 Potrero Road, stated support for Draft Policy "B" and the creation of an arts commission appointed by the City Council. Lee Swam, 9065 Lakeview Drive, recommended that before any additional art is installed, the City must take care of the ones it already has. He urged the repair of the statues in and around the City Administration Building and'; challenged the North County Mural Society to the task of preserving murals at the Youth Center. He emphasized the need to develop a plan for addressing vandalism and the on- CC 01/23/96 00,0051 Page 7 going maintenance of public art. ---end of testimony--- Lengthy Council discussion ensued. There was mutual consent to: 1) Direct staff to bring back a revised Draft Policy "B" for public art on private property to include a provision for public hearing before the City Council, 2) Tentatively approve Draft "C" for public art on public property (prior review of project to be conducted by an ad hoc arts sub-committee selected by the Parks & Recreation Commission), and 3) Direct staff to revise the sign ordinance by establishing an exemption for art murals. It was noted that all three matters would be brought back for final approval. On a related topic, Brady Cherry asked the City Council for clarification about action taken on August 8, 1995 relative to proposed public art at the Lake Park Pavilion (Linda Wargo, Atascadero State Hospital). Mayor Highland stated that the Council had conceptually approved the project proposed for art in the public area of the Pavilion. In addition, he said that the Council had approved Phase I of the project which includes the work to go across the sidewalk. The development of an arts in public places policy was referred to the Parks & Recreation Commission, he added. Councilmember Luna commented that he understood that the policy was to be put together first. Councilmember Johnson remembered that the proponents of the project were anxious to get conceptual approval before the onset of the school year and explained that he had not approved anything beyond Phase I. MOTION: By Councilmember Luna, seconded by Councilmember Bewley to go beyond 11 :00 p.m.; motion carried unanimously. Councilmember Johnson noted that the item had been a presentation, not a business item, and questioned whether or not the Council could have legally acted upon the matter. Art Montandon explained that because of the way the item was noticed, the Council had authority to act, but suggested that the Council clarify by motion the intent. Councilmember Johnson asserted that the item was brought to the City Council in an unacceptable format and without adequate staff input. Discussion ensued. Councilmember Carden indicated that he was not convinced that third-grade art was appropriate for the Pavilion and suggested that staff re- negotiate with Linda Wargo an alternative site for placement of the tile. By mutual consent, staff was directed to re-negotiate with Linda Wargo regarding the proposed project. 1. INITIATION OF CITY COUNCIL-GENERATED GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS (Oral) (Staff recommendation: Provide staff direction) Steve DeCamp provided an oral report regarding proposed City Council initiated General Plan amendments and estimated costs. Staff recommendations were as follows: 1) Initiate a General Plan Amendment to include within the Urban CC 01/23/96 Page 8 000052 Services Line two commercially-zoned parcels on the west side of 101 at Del Rio Road (one parcel owned by the City of Atascadero and one parcel commonly known as the Hemingway property), 2) Initiate a General Plan l Amendment to modify the zoning on the north east side of Traffic Way at Ferrocarrill Road (also known as the "Rose Lip Quarry) from residential to industrial and 3) Take no action to initiate a General Plan Amendment for the "Davis Family Ranch land". He explained that although staff believes the property would be appropriate for industrial use, the owners do not wish it to be rezoned. Councilmember Luna emphasized that he was not in favor of devoting any staff time to these proposed amendments, especially in light of the Citizens' Task Force for Economic Recovery request to put a moratorium on. additional expenditures until they have completed their study. MOTION: By Councilmember Carden seconded by Councilmember Johnson to include the two lots [on west side of 101 at Del Rio Road] within the Urban Services Line as a General Plan Amendment; motion carried 4:1 (Luna). MOTION: By Councilmember Johnson, seconded by Councilmember Bewley to direct staff to initiate the General Plan Amendment rezoning the Rose Lip Quarry area; motion carried 4:1 (Luna). Public Comments: • David Zin99� Ferrocarrill Road property owner, asserted that industrial zoning would negatively impact his property value. Rush Kolemaine spoke in support of the Council action. 3. REVIEW STREET LIGHTS IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA AND DISCUSS POTENTIAL POLICY DEVELOPMENT (Staff recommendation: Provide staff direction) Councilmember Carden stepped down due to a potential conflict of interest. Brady Cherry provided the staff report and summarized three types of luminaries which can be installed by PG&E without cost to the City. He noted 'l that Option #2 (Colonial Type Pole) would be easiest to standardize and mentioned that whichever type is chosen, they will be changed over as they need replacement by PG&E. The City Council mutually agreed to direct staff to proceed with Option #2 (Colonial Type Pole). 4. APPOINTMENT OF PLANNING COMMISSIONER TO ECONOMIC ROUND TABLE (Verbal) (Staff recommendation: Appoint one member from Planning;Commission) Councilmember Carden returned to the dias. Steve DeCamp reported that Commissioner Jim Edwards has found it necessary to resign from the Economic Round Table and indicated that Commissioners Jennifer Hageman and William Zimmerman were both interested in serving. CC 01/23/96 Page 9 000053 12/28/95 i City of Atascadero '• Parks and Recreation Commission Dear Sirs: The undersigned members of the Ad Hoc Committee for Art In Public Places respectfully submit the attached document for your consideration and recommendation for adoption, to the Atascadero City Council. This draft of Art in Public Places Guidelines incorporates discussions and objectives evolved during the Ad Hoc Committee's meetings, and represents the consensus of at least six committee members. This set of guidlines: • Has as its objective the encouragement of all forms of visual art placed for view by the public and delineates the functions for doing so. Defines and describes procedures for both privately and publicly owned art. • Creates an exception to the sign ordinance for works of art approved by a committee of artistically knowledgeable citizens, appointed by the City Council. • Is a complete guideline. It addresses the composition and function of the committee, clearly sets forth a streamlined procedure of approval, sets standards and outlines themes for the Colony District of Atascadero. We strongly recommend that the City Council adopt this set of guidelines that encourages and assists the development public artworks on private and public property. —��.A,�CT� B�y�^►4-rte,., ?,eS, Ori ��yrt,il ra'z N o�.7yt Gouty itij �uQ�'A'� so Nod�Cax � �u.✓a t �ou� �Z �i��:/reZ %'7a/oy�a��u� No:Th Gliv11yvra/ cc: Atacadero City Council 000054 t - 17 January, 1996 Atascadero City Council: For almost two years the Art in Public Places Committee of the County Arts Council has been studying the policies of California communities regarding art in public places so that we would be able to answer questions and offer suggestions regarding Art in Public Policies for the communities in our county. In March of 1995 letters were sent to all county localities suggesting that they institute Art in Public Places policies for their area. I met with Brady Cherry and Steve DeCamp on August 1 to discuss such a policy for Atascadero. It was suggested that a committtee be formed of a diverse group of individuals not just artists to act as advisors. I gave the information from the study by the County Arts Council to Brady Cherry to use in preparing an Art in Public'Places Policy for the City of Atascadero. The ad hoc committee formed under the chairmanship of Parks and Recreation Commissioner Paul Hood to consider Brady's report met several times but could not agree on his report, so two proposals were presented to the Parks and Recreation Commission. Whereas it would be ideal to have a separate Commission or Committee, the Parks and Recreation Commission has sent you a proposal that would allow a pool of interested residents of Atascadero [artists, historians, architects, landscape designers, etc.] be established from which the P&RC would chose individuals to review the artistic merit of any proposal for art in publicly owned'facilities. These persons would then make their recommendations to the P&RC at a public hearing. I support the recommendation of the P&RC and urge the City Council to adopt this policy. Since the Ad Hoc Committee was set up to consider art in publicly owned or leased property only, I feel it would now be appropriate to send this proposal, if adopted, back to staff and consider it for art in/on privately owned property to which the public has access [exclusive of private residences.] 0 000055 Susan J. Beatie 10025 EI Camino Real #8 • Atascadero, California 93422 • 805-466-5389 Proposals considered"Public Art" whether in/on publicly or privately owned property should go through the process of artistic review and public hearing where the "public" has the opportunity to comment. Support for a proposed project is important. If a proposal is not designed to please the public perhaps it should be installed where the public does not have access. Very truly yours, 17 January, 1996 - Susan J. Beatie - page 2/2 000056 i 12 February, 1996 SLO County Supervisors asked the County Arts Council for guidelines regarding Murals. These are the recommendations that the Art in Public Places Committee of the Council presented to them. I I. The community in which the mural is to be exhibited should be aware of the proposal and residents should have the opportunity to comment. [Has your community been advised to this proposal through public meeting or news media?] 2. The material and methods shall be suitable for outdoor display. [Has the surface been prepared, paints and material suitable for out of doors to withstand weathering?] I The mural must be maintained or removed. [Who will be responsible for the upkeep or removal of the mural?] I would suggest that these recommendations beart of an request for murals in Atascadero. P Y e9 Susan I Beatie 0 00005'7 s