Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 08/24/1981 AGENDA - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting August 24 , 1981 7: 30 P.M. Atascadero Administration Building it Call to Order Pledge of Allegiance Invocation Roll Call Public Comment A. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Item A, Consent Calendar , are con- sidered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion in the form listed below. There will be no separate discussion of these items . If discussion is required , that item will be removed; from the Consent Calendar and will be considered separately. Vote may be by roll call . 1 . Minutes of the regular meeting of August 10 , 1981 (RECOMMEND APPROVAL) i2 . Lot Line Adjustment LA 810227 : 1 , 10055 E1 Camino Real , Rex & Betty Hendrix , Ray Bunnell (Associated Professions) , to ad- just an existing lot line to eliminate a 25 foot wide drive- way from one piece of property and join it to another piece (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) 3 . Acceptance of Lot Line Adjustment LA80-26 , ' 9110 Atascadero Avenue , Gary Schmidt (Hilliard) (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLAN- NING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) 4 . Tentative Tract Map AT 810320 : 2 (Tract No. , 977) , Northwest corner of Garcia and Santa Cruz, Mike .Yeomans (Twin Cities Engineering) , to allow subdivision of approximately 23 . 3 acres into nine parcels of 2.5 acres each (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) 5 . Conditional Use Permit U810707 : 1 , Via Avenue near Atascadero Creek, McKeen Enterprise's (Brannon) , to allow landscaped parking in the required front yard in an M-1 Zone for a 2385 sq . ft . industrial building (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) 6 . Conditional Use Permit U810608 : 1 , 5830 Entrada , Mary Pulsifer to allow a dog grooming business with a residence on the ground floor (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) AGENDA - ATASCADERO *Y COUNCIL - AUGUST 24 , 1 7 . Business license application, U-Win Card Room, 5940 El Camino Real (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDA- TION) 8 . Claim of Jack Townsend for damages and injuries (RECOMMEND DENIAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH RECOMMENDATION FROM INSURANCE ADJUSTERS) 9 . Agreement with Senior Citizens United , Inc . for financial support (RECOMMEND APPROVAL) 10 . Award of Bid #81 -11 , Dump Truck , to Pete Johnston Chevrolet in the amount of $27 ,908 . 12 (RECOMMEND APPROVAL AND AUTHORI- ZATION FOR CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE LEASE PURCHASE AGREEMENT) 11 . Award of Bid #81-13 , Air Compressor ,o pressor , to Mustang Equipment in the amount of $13 , 488 . 88 (RECOMMEND APPROVAL) 12. Award of bid for street sweeping to Harold Peterson in the amount of $20 , 800 (RECOMMEND APPROVAL AND AUTHORIZE TRANSFER OF $8 , 800 FROM CONTINGENCY RESERVE) B. HEARINGS, APPEARANCES AND REPORTS 1 . Appearance of North County Contractors Association requesting adoption of an Appeals Board 2 . Report from City Manager on special drainage project i (Security Bank and Gordon Hunt frontage) 3 . City Attorney Report #15 C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1 . Resolution No. 25-81 adopting a Memorandum of Understanding with the Atascadero Police Officers Association D. NEW BUSINESS 1 . Consideration of amendments to Salary Classification Plan 2. Consideration of request of City' of Santa Maria to support legislation to allow local governments to have more control of businesses that sell alcoholic beverages E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION 1 . City Council 2. City Attorney 3 . City Manager "F11410*9 2 MINUTES - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL • Regular Meeting August 10 , 1981 7 : 30 p.m. Atascadero Administration Building I The meeting was called to order at 7 : 30 p.m. by Mayor Wilkins with the Pledge of Allegiance. Elder Muldare from the Four Square Gospel Church gave the invocation . ROLL CALL PRESENT: Councilmen , Mackey, Nelson , Stover and Mayor Wilkins �Highland ` ABSENT: Non PUBLIC COMMENT There was no public comment. A. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 . Minutes of the special meeting of July 27 , 1981 (RECOMMEND APPROVAL) • 2. Minutes of the regular meeting of July 27 , 1981 (RECOMMEND APPROVAL) 3 . Treasurer ' s Report , 7-1-81 to 7-31 -81 (RECOMMEND APPROVAL) 4. Acceptance of Parcel Map AT 80-95 , 10755 Vista Road, Glen Lewis (Stewart) (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) 5 . Acceptance of Parcel Map AT 810327 : 1 , 9600 , 9630 Carmelita , Edward Anderson (Twin Cities Engineering) (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) 6. Acceptance of Parcel Map AT 810107 : 1 , 9100 El Camino Real , Donald Messer (Hilliard) (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COM- MISSION RECOMMENDATION) 7 . Tentative Parcel Map AT 810420 : 1 , Santa Lucia, Cencerro , and San Lucas Roads , Tenneco West (Twin Cities Engineering) to realign portions of Santa Lucia and Cencerro roads and to adjust certain lot lines resulting from said road alignment (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) 8 . Tentative Tract Map AT 810225 : 1 , 6600 and 6650 Alcantara, Dennis Moresco (Contract Survey & Design) to allow conversion • of an existing triplex apartment into three air-space condo- miniums and creation of an additional eight new units as air- space condominiums with the two existing lots combined into one (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMEN- DATION) MINUTES - ATASCADERC&TY COUNCIL -AUGUST 10 , 1 9 . Departmental Review R810714 : 1 , Variance V810516: 1 , 6600 & 6650 Alcantara , Dennis Moresco (Contract Survey & Design) to allow construction of eight two bedroom units and to reduce the required 25 ' front yard (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) Mayor Wilkins reviewed all items ontheConsent Calendar . There was a correction to the minutes on pages 4 and 5 . Herb LaPrade should be changed to read Wayne LaPrade on both pages . Councilman Mackey wished to have items A-8 and A-9 withdrawn from the Consent Calendar . MOTION: Councilman Stover moved for the approval of the Consent Calendar with the exception of Items A-8 and A-9 and in- cluding the corrections to the minutes . The motion was seconded by Councilman Nelson and unanimously carried by roll call vote. A-8 and A-9 , 6600 & 6650 Alcantara , Dennis Moresco Councilman Mackey felt that the density allowed for this project was too great; there was a ditch at the rear of the property which limited the available building space. There was some discussion re- garding this matter . MOTION : Councilman Nelson moved that Council accept Items A-8 and A-9 . The motion was seconded by Councilman Stover and unani- mously nani mously carried by roll call vote. B. HEARINGS, APPEARANCES AND REPORTS 1 . Public hearing on Road Abandonment A801210 ; 1 , 2450-2500 E1 Camino Real , James Gaskell and James Wentzel , to abandon Madera Place between Freeway 101 and El Camino Real Mr. Warden reviewed this item stating that the Planning Commission had conducted a. public hearing on this matter and approved the abandonment. The road will become the property of contiguous pro- perty owners. Mayor Wilkins asked if there were any comments from the public on this matter . There were none. MOTION: Councilman Mackey moved that Resolution No. 24-81 be read by title only. The motion was seconded by Councilman Stover and unanimously carried. Mayor Wilkins read Resolution No. 24-81 by title only. MOTION : Councilman Stover moved for the adoption of Resolution No. 24-81 . The motion was seconded by Councilman Mackey and unanimously carried . • 2 MINUTES - ATASCADERO OTY COUNCIL - AUGUST 10 , 10 2. Report by City Manager on Atascadero Police Officers Asso- ciation Memorandum of Understanding Mr . Warden stated that , since Council had determined a dead- line of August 15th , to settle salary negotiations , he was bringing this matter to Council because a formal written MOU was not yet ready for Council consideration . The Police Association has verbally settled as expected , however , the actual MOU has not been reviewed and signed by the Association . He anticipates that this will be done be- fore the next Council meeting. He asked that Council continue this matter to the next meeting. MOTION: Councilman Mackey moved that this matter be returned to Council on August 24th. The motion was seconded by Council- man Stover and unanimously carried . C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None D. NEW BUSINESS 1 . Consideration of San Luis Obispo County/Cities Basic Plan for Peacetime Emergencies Mr . Warden reviewed the Basic Plan for Council . He stated that • the Plan had been a coordinated effort between the County and the cities in the County. This plan is not the Diablo power plant plan . MOTION: Councilman Nelson moved for the approval of the initial Plan . The motion was seconded by Councilman Stover and unanimously carried by roll call vote. 2 . Resolution No. 23-81 approving application for 1980 State Grant monies for the Alvord Field improvement project Mr . Warden stated that this resolution formalized the City' s application for funds provided by the State of California 1980 Park- lands Act. The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board has determined that this project has the highest priority for expenditure of these funds. The improvements include lighting , installation of an under- ground watering system, bleachers , backstop , dugout benches and land- scaping for a total cost of $68 , 318 . The amount allocated to the City under the 1980 Parklands Act is $60 , 979 . MOTION : Councilman Mackey moved that Resolution No. 23-81 be read by title only. The motion was seconded by Councilman Stover and unanimously carried . Mayor Wilkins read Resolution No. 23-81 by title only. MOTION : Councilman Stover moved for the adoption of Resolution • No. 23-81 . The motion was seconded by Councilman Nelson and unanimously carried by roll call vote . 3 MINUTES - ATASCADEROITY COUNCIL - AUGUST 10 , �1 E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION 1 . City Council • (a) Councilman Mackey asked if anything had been done with regard to the letter from the Chamber of Commerce about industrial development . There was considerable discussion re- garding this matter and its eventual resolution through the General Plan process . Comments were offered by George Molina . (b) Councilman Mackey asked about the Traffic Committee . Mr . Warden stated that the Citizen ' s Committee is supposed to be coming back with more information before the matter is scheduled before Council . (c) Mr . Stover brought up the matter of illegal signs . Mr . Warden stated that Staff is aware of the situation , however , there is a problem with availability of enforcement manpower . He noted that the entire problem of enforcement is of Staff concern and , as some of the pressure is relieved in preparing City ordinances to replace County ordinances , that enforcement will become more active. (d) Mr . Stover asked what the City was doing about people living in trailers. Mr . Warden discussed time re- straints and availability of manpower to cope with these problems. • (e) Mayor Wilkins presented Don Sylvia , outgoing Fire Chief, with a Certificate of Appreciation. He thanked Don for his service to the City since its incorporation . (f) Mayor Wilkins commented on the plight of the Lone Ranger being unable to wear his mask in public noting that the City of Vallejo was asking for a resolution supporting their position . (g) Councilman Nelson suggested another joint meeting with the Chamber of Commerce. There was further discussion on this matter with Mr . Warden stating that basically nothing has changed since the last meeting. He said that the problems identified by the Chamber will have to be worked out through amendments or addi- tions to the General Plan. The Council has already adopted a policy position , but this must now be translated into General Plan provi- sions. 2 . City Attorney (a) Mr . Grimes reported that the municipal code codification program was underway and that Book Publishing Company was making progress . 3 . City Manager (a) Mr . Warden reminded Councilmembers about the League of • California Cities Channel Counties Division meeting in Ventura this Friday. 4 MINUTES - ATASCADERO OTY COUNCIL -AUGUST 10 , 10 (b) Mr . Warden advised Council of a Small Cities Planning meeting in Visalia. (c) Mr . Warden requested a closed session to discuss employee negotiations. He did not anticipate that there would be an announcement at the end of the meeting. The meeting adjourned to closed session at 8 : 10 p.m. and returned to regular session at 9 : 15 p.m. and adjourned . Recorded by, MURRAY L. WARDEN , City Clerk By: Ardith Davis Deputy City Clerk • 5 M E M O R A N D U M TO: CITY MANAGER August 18 , 1981 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT LA 810227 : 1 LOCATION: 10055 El Camino Real APPLICANT: Rex & Betty Hendrix , Ray Bunnell (Associated Professions) REQUEST: To adjust an existing lot line to eliminate a 25 foot wide driveway from one piece of property and join it to another piece On August 17 , 1981 the Planning Commission considered the subject matter unanimously adopting Findinga 1-2 and approving the ad- justment subject to Conditions 1-6 as listed in the attached Staff Report with the following revision to Condition #3: • "3 . There is a minor encroachment by a portion of an existing single family residence on the adjacent lot. A Note to this effect shall appear on the Final Map. " This matter was originally scheduled on Consent Calendar but was removed from discussion by the Commission of the appropriate way to handle the encroachment problem. Rex Hendrix , applicant, spoke requesting that the encroachment be noted on the Final Map. No one else appeared. 4V� WRENCE STEVENS U RAY WARDEN Planning Director C ty M pager • r a r i� Ir h r CITY OF ATASCADERO i91l3 G �^i rl��I 1979 r, FPlanning Department August 17 , 1981 s �E�o STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: Lot Line Adjustment LA 810227 :1 LOCATION: 10055 El Camino Real IPPLICANT: Rex and Betty Hendrix, Ray Bunnell (Associated Professions) REQUEST: To adjust an existing lot line to eliminate a 25 foot wide driveway from one piece of property and join it to another piece BACKGROUND 1. Existing Zoning: R-4 2. General Plan: High Density Multiple Family Residential 3. Environmental Determination: The Planning Director has determined the application as presented to be a Class 5 (a) . Categorical Exemption. 4. Site Conditions : The 25 foot wide driveway is currently a part of the property that is developed as the Rancho Del Bordo Mobile Home Park, being parcel two of parcel map recorded in Book 10, page 69 . Parcel three of this same parcel map is developed with an old two-story barn/residence which was formerly some type of commercial meat-packing business . The rear of the parcel is also developed with another two story residence and another detached barn . South of the subject properties are other older single-family residences which generally take access from Mussleman Drive. A minor structural encroachment occurs across the existing southerly property line of proposed Parcel A near El Camino Real. 5 Project Description: The applicants are proposing to eliminate the northerly line of an existing 25 foot wide easement and adjusting this line so as to close off the easement at the extension of existing parcel 3' s rear property line. The applicant and adjacent property owner are both aware of the encroachment and are willing to offer the removal of the en- croachment as a condition to be met prior to the issuance of a. building permit on either parcel. STAFF COMMENTS • Thisapplication was first reviewed by the Subdivision Review Board on April 2, 1981, at which time possible encroachments across the Page Two • Re: Lot Line Adjustment LA810227: 1 (Hendrix/Bunnell) August 17, 1981 southerly line of the 25 foot wide driveway that were not reflected on the tentative map were discussed. The engineer was contacted to submit a revised map reflecting the encroachments. After a field survey, it was determined that there was a minor encroachment of about half a foot by the dwelling nearest El Camino Real on the adjacent property. The application was referred back to the Sub- division Review Board at their meeting of August 6 , 1981. Plan- ning and engineering staff together with Bob Lillev, Planning Commissioner, met with the applicant, Rex Hendrix, his agent Ed King, and Leon McCaslin, adjacent property owner, to discuss the application. There was considerable discussion related to the necessity in resolving the encroachments. Several alternatives were discussed: 1) Require elimination of encroachments prior to recordation of the Final Map. 2) Record an easement for the encroachments which would terminate upon elimination of structures. • 3) Require removal of encroachments as a condition of the issuance of building permits on either parcels. In addition, it was also pointed out that all affected parties should be fully aware of the encroachment situation and that future buyers should be made aware by including an informational note on the final map. FINDINGS 1. The application as submitted has been determined to be Cate- gorically Exempt from the requirements of C.E.Q.A. as defined by Class 5 (a) . 2 . The application as presented conforms with the applicable zon- ing and subdivision regulations. RECOMMENDATION Based upon the above findings, the Planning Department recommends approval of Lot Line Adjustment LA 810227: 1 subject to the following: • 1. The approval of this lot line adjustment as shown on the attach- ment provided herein shall be submitted in a Final Map format to be approved by the Planning Department prior to recordation by the County Recorder' s Office . 0 Page Three Re: Lot Line Adjustment LA 810227 :1 (Hendrix/Bunnell) August 17 , 1981 2 . Any tree removal or site grading necessary for the development of the lots shall be subject to Planning Department approval prior to issuance of a building permit. This requirement shall appear as a note on the Final Map. 3. The existing minor encroachment by a portion of the single family residence on the adjacent lot shall be removed, or shall be granted an easement to be allowed to remain, in conjunction with the issuance of any building permits for the subject property. A note to this effect shall appear on the Final Map. a. If an easement is used, it shall terminate upon removal of the encroaching structure. (Note : While not a condition of this approval, the encroachment would be required to be removed with any development on that site. ) 4. The proposed lot lines shall be surveyed and monuments set at the new property corners, 5. The location of all easements of record shall be delineated on • the Final Map. 6 . Approval of this Lot Line Adjustment shall expire one year from the date of final approval unless a time extension has been granted pursuant to a written request prior to the expiration date. ACTION The Planning Commission should direct Staff as deemed appropriate . TO APPROVE: Motion to adopt findings and set conditions . TO DENY: Motion setting findings for denial. REPORT PREPARED BY: MARY E. ATIE Associate Planner REPORT APPROVED BY: ZW_V_V'� LAWRENCE STEVENS • Planning Director /Ps ccs Z. C5 N, 00 6 - � 7P � 6 �• kill� r 1i 10) ca <,. `•,� O S, t y v 8 � j���� lam` y ,Op ` a N O 19 '� _ ' ------- RDO wE /95 C-2-0(535) 7.2¢•79 3 4 5 _ N�vo2i4„vR� ¢��.�y cors 10-14,,6r�l 25 = '` 1434 R-1-a -��c-2 3 �2'� • 13 12 i 1 1 O cars !pA ,8v� l7G5 5A;C•Z-D 1 -rG ID �O?7 Zoo- 14 15 p Rq \ \ 166,2- R4 Yo / � is A 17 \CI c377- _ 2-17 S�"74 \ '\ \ , �'\ \ \ \� 117-�-Dg ro�'//•p � N \ `\ `' �\ \ � '� 1285 c•2•D,3 8"8'� • 31 \�`�\ IZ$S tor5 i-3 y3� 7 rz 2G 7 Ax 1221 Gam. ,eC-Vi'aotl 2 /4 7 \ \ �. 32'\ `•� \QP PQ ro7v6A Arm ;r _ 4 :5,—W7A p A _ CIO - 1140 -1 A0 ,Q /I Z3•?t� t, 8CK• 3,GoT 4• III Z-1 rU R-3 34 ��a� 2-A m c-/-O � '� ;,,'�. _-� ,. �� .�.. low ,�-r � G-t m Gr- 9•Z•�9 � 35 ® - i . �-:�- -- P'AZ2 C-1 Td C-2, 7.3-&7 9/7 4,73 401. M 06 �#XIV &-.Z6• rry' h 2 l'I�rV 5'31 64l�s'. �-.' � /•3•�� . ORD. AREA DAT'.. ?s , . • •,. , - REVISIONS I� SECTI 12 -0-34 600' . , 44 S/ d-2-?-7: / /00,575 El CAAA//Uv IA Lu 00 � v �Qo4tQy tZ. _... _ -.. W ooscz � aEoaEs � 10 I \ Mir ICOZ to N W U M E M O R A N D U M TO: CITY MANAGER August 18 , 1981 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: Acceptance of Lot Line Adjustment LA80-26 LOCATION: 9110 Atascadero Avenue APPLICANT: Gary Schmidt (Hilliard) On December 8 , 1980 the City Council approved tentative Lot Line Adjustment LA 80-26 to adjust existing lot lines by approximately 0 . 1 acres , subject to certain conditions and in concurrence with the recommendation of the Planning Commission . The zoning is R-A and the General Plan designation is Moderate Density Single Family Residential . Staff review has determined that all conditions of approval have • been met. On August 17 , 1981 the Planning Commission reviewed the Final Map and recommends its acceptance. /"ez LAWRENCE STEVENS �rIAY . WARDEN Planning Director Cnager M E M O R A N D- U M TO: PLANNING COMMISSION August 17 , 1981 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: Acceptance of Lot Line Adjustment LA 80-26 LOCATION: 9110 Atascadero Avenue APPLICANT: Gary Schmidt (Hilliard) On December 8 , 1980 the City Council approved tentative Lot Line Adjustment LA 80-26 to adjust existing lot lines by approximately 0.1 acres, subject to certain conditions and in concurrence with the recommendation of the Planning Commission. The zoning is R-A and the General Plan designation is Moderate Density Single Family Residential. Staff review has determined that all conditions of approval have been met. LAWRENCE STEVENS Planning Director /PS SC,Q DE.eO -/, OF - e✓f+ 4M 20o <s/g 6EAtiwr6,T �+ 25.os' . 4',p_/ S9o.Z6 h p \ e N a 4i M k 0 0 ' 1807 o.c 735 _. � ,N A A � •p of 75-291 3t - -/ Af av ori it y 1 14, tq Oz -y, wA���r`.tli.rayy,,,,,,,,,,,,,, it �:s '.�+;?.n-.+outrea;'w�+�•.ar!N. _ a xss.;s ...:* �. .. ti a �.4F10E� � 0-7Gz9cers ceoss a DE14-5 un/cS N �M i ~' 3f, _ 92 t/irk 40 .tom /SB a ` ASUOE,po zz-,2./ Nva a ry ��ON✓- N Na 1 /New e 80 /.oB3 Aces T 1 110 /� 771,5CPO 0�00 RID r .Sss SNEIT -/ a I /S's�wct �-Ass-,..s+vr /SSS et f•!� , i X39'113'90 L 2o9.oe" P•/ !,N s I M E M O R A N D U M TO: CITY MANAGER August 18 , 1981 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT : TENTATIVE TRACT MAP AT 810320 :2 (Tract No. '977) LOCATION: Northwest corner of Garcia and Santa Cruz APPLICANT: Mike Yeomans (Twin Cities Engineering) ] REQUEST: To allow subdivision of approximately 23 . 3 acres into nine parcels of 2.5 acres each On July 6 , 1981 the Planning Commission continued the public hear- ing on the nine lot subdivision to August 3 a the applicant ' s request at which time the Commission directed Staff to ;prepare findings and conditions for the nine lot request . On August 17 the Planning Commission unanimously adopted Findings 1 -2, adopted a Conditional Negative Declaration and approved the subdivision subject to Conditions 1-17 as listed in the attached Staff Report . At the various hearings , the Commission discussion centered on the possible need for a focused EIR due to the loss of agricultural land , on the deed restrictions proposed by the applicant concern- ing the walnut trees , and on the General Plan criteria for deter- mining the appropriate lot size for this subdivision. It was the consensus of the Commission that the project adequately satisfied the criteria to allow lots at the minimum size due primarily to the flat slope of the property, the existence of smaller lots in the vicinity and past actions on similar requests . Mike Yeomans , applicant , spoke in support of his request for nine lots adressing each of the General Plan criteria . The applicant pointed to the cost of roads and utilities , including undergrounding, as contributory factors in support of the request . Mr . Yeomans also indicated the nature of deed restrictions that he proposed for the project . At the August 17 hearing he indicated concurrence with the recommended conditions . Allen Campbell , applicants engineer , also spoke .in support of the request . No one else appeared at any of the hearings. LAWRENCE STEVENS M RAY L . WARDEN Planning Director C ty anager • CITY ,OF ATASCADERO nl P = F:Fri i9is'y �'1s�9 Planning Department August 17 , 1981 \ �D STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: Tentative Tract Map AT 810320: 2 (Tract No. 977) LOCATION: Northwest corner of Santa Cruz and Garcia Roads APPLICANT: Mike Yeomans (Twin Cities Engineering) REQUEST: -To allow subdivision of approximately 23. 3 acres into nine parcels of 2 . 5 acres each BACKGROUND 1. Existing Zoning: A-1-B-V-3 2. General Plan: Suburban Single Family Residential 3. Environmental Determination: The initial study environmental description form has been completed. The Planning Director has prepared a Draft Conditional Negative Declaration indica- ting the project will not create significant adverse environ- mental effects if certain mitigation measures are incorporated into the project. 4 . Site Conditions : The site has gently rolling terrain with steeper portions along the northerly portions of the property near the City boundary line. The southeasterly corner of the property fronts on Garcia Road and Santa Cruz is a paper road, now a dirt path, along the southerly boundary of the property. The site does not contain any buildings and is covered by a mature walnut orchard. A 500 KV and 230 KV PG&E Transmission lines cross the property near the intersection of Garcia and Santa Cruz Roads. A smaller distribution line parallels the easterly property line. City sewer is not available while water, gas, electric and telephone are. 5. Project Description: The applicant proposes to divide the existing four lots (3. 4; 5. 07, 5 . 18 and 9 . 76 acres) into nine lots of approximately 2. 5 acres each. It is intended to ex- tend Santa Cruz Road along the southerly property frontage and to provide a 650 foot cul-de-sac from Santa Cruz to serve Parcels 2-6 . Deed restrictions are proposed to assure retention of the walnut trees except for roads and building sites . Page Two Re: Tentative Tract Map AT 810320 : 2 (Yeomans) August 17 , 1981 6. Reports from Affected Agencies : a. County Engineering Department reports the project is outside the district boundary. b. Southern California Gas Company reports an existing 2" main in Garcia Road and points out limitations on future service. c. Atascadero Unified School District points out that addi- tional housing will further impact Monterrey Road School. d. City Engineering Department recommends undergrounding of utilities, improvement of Santa Cruz, Garcia and the pro- posed cul-de-sac, and clarification of an existing driveway encroachment across proposed parcels 4 and 5. e. The City Fire Department indicates a 6 minute response time and recommends hydrants be installed and fire retardant • roof coverings be used. f. Pacific Telephone reports they are able to serve the site. g. Atascadero Mutual Water Company reports they are able to serve the site and notes two recovery payments . h. Pacific Gas and Electric reports they are able to serve the site; points out building prohibitions under the 500 KV and 230 KV transmission lines, and makes several comments on utility easements . i. The City Police Department reports no problems with the project. STAFF COMMENTS On Thursday, May 7, 1981 the Subdivision Review Board met with the applicant, Mike Yeomans and his engineer, Allen Campbell , to review this application. Also in attendance at the meeting were: Larry Stevens, Planning Director; Mary Beatie, Associate Planner; John Kennaly, Assistant Civil Engineer; Don Sylvia, Fire Chief; and Mike Sherer, Planning Commissioner. The following items were discussed: • 1. Improve Garcia Road, Santa Cruz Road and proposed cul-de-sac. 2 . Proposed street name for cul-de-sac needs approval before Final Map. Page Three Re: Tentative Tract Map AT 810320 :2 (Yeomans) August 17 , 1981 3. Status of easement rights on Santa Cruz for Gordon Davis Cattle Company as it may or may not be affected by true alignment of Sanaa Cruz. Show easement on Final Map. 4. Status of easement across Lots 4 and 5 . Submit easement docu- mentation and show on Final Map. 5. Possible future participation in bridge improvement on Garcia Road. 6. Clarification of exact alignment of Santa Cruz Road related to adjacent property to south and west and location of drainage swale. 7. Possible drainage improvements with regard to creek near Lot 31. 8. All new utilities and utility connections to be underground. 9 . Three fire hvdrants required; restrict roof coverings to Class "C" or better. • 10 . Sewer not available —require percolation tests at time of building permits. 11. Water available by extending mains; property has two outstanding water recovery payments. 12 . 2" gas main in Garcia Road. 13 . High pressure gas line through property - show on Final Map. 14. P. G. , & E. easements across most of Lot 9 and part of Lot 8 with possible building restrictions; require 20 ° P.U.E. contiguous to northeast property. 15. Possible Focused E. I.R. addressing agricultural potential, and loss thereof, and size of lots at edge of City. 16. Submit preliminary soils report prior to recording of Final Map. Submit final soils report prior to installation of improvements . 17. All easements of record shall be shown on Final Map. 18. As a possible alternative to item 15, submit detailed analysis of past and current agricultural use of land for review by the Planning Department prior to environmental determination and . scheduling before the Planning Commission. Page Four Re: Tentative Tract Map AT 810320 : 2 (Yeomans) August 17 , 1981 19. Applicant indicated strong desire to preserve as many walnut trees as possible and indicated that when lots are sold there would be a deed restriction for tree removal other than that absolutely necessary for construction. 20. Based on General Plan, the Planning Department may consider recommending a redesign of lots to a lesser number. 21. Applicant should obtain copies of letters received by Planning Department from various utility companies. Primary concern with regard to the project is the size of the lots being created. Under the A-1-B-V-3 zoning, the following chart applies : Average Density 0-10% 10-150 15-20 20-25 3 acres 1 ac. 2 ac. 2-1-2 ac. 312 ac. The proposal exceeds the average density of three acres but more • than satisfies the lot slope relationship due to the gently rolling terrain. Consideration must also be given to the following General Plan criteria in evaluating lot size in the 22-10 acre range for the Suburban category: - slope of the access road to the building site - availability of services - distance from the center of the community - general character of neighboring lands - percolation - area needed for access road The most obvious factor pointing to larger lot sizes than proposed is the distance from the center of the community since the property abuts the northeasterly City boundary line. Services , other than sewers , are generally available. Slope and land area for roads are also minor factors . . A brief review of lot sizes in the area in- dicates a number of smaller lots along Garcia/Monterrey (approximately one acre) , but there are also as many larger lots (2-6 acres) . As part of the SRB meeting, there was discussion concerning a possible focused EIR because of the potential loss of agricultural land. The applicant has submitted a statement regarding walnut production on the site and, further, via deed restrictions, hopes to maintain a "small family farm" leval of production that may prove more viable. This should sufficiently mitigate concerns • Page Six • Re : Tentative Tract Map AT 810320 :2 (Yeomans) August 17 , 1981 "Appropriate soils reports including a percolation test, a test to determine the presence of ground water, and a log of a soil boring to a minimum depth of ten (10) feet shall be submitted to the Atascadero Planning Department prior to the issuance of a building permit on each lot. Where soils reports indicate that conventional soil absorption systems are not acceptable, City approval of plans for an alternative private sewage disposal system, designed by a Registered Civil Engineer, shall be required. Depending upon the system, more restrictive requirements may be imposed. " 2. Water shall be obtained from the Atascadero Mutual Water Com- pany and water operable facilities shall exist at each parcel frontage prior to filing of the Final Map. a. Installation of water lines may be deferred to allow in- stallation in conjunction with road improvements . 3 , Telephone, electric, conduit for cable television service, and gas lines shall be extended underground to each parcel frontage prior to filing the Final Map. • a. Installation of utilities may be deferred to allow instal- lation in conjunction with road improvements. 4 . Three fire hydrants of a type and size specified by the City Fire Department shall be installed by the applicant in conjunc- tion with construction of roads generally in the following locations : - along the unnamed cul-de-sac at a point common to Parcels 5 and 6 as shown on the Tentative Map; at the intersection of Santa Cruz Road with the unnamed cul-de-sac; and - at the intersection of Santa Cruz Road with Garcia Road Exact location and manner of placement shall be subject to the approval of Fire Department. A letter from the Fire Department certifying the installation of the hydrant shall be received by the Planning Department prior to the completion of the roads . 5 . The applicant shall construct Santa Cruz Road, Garcia Road, and the unnamed cul-de-sac along the frontage of the property being the subject of this tract map to City standards providing as follows : • Page Five Re : Tentative Tract Map AT 810320 :2 (Yeomans) August 17 , 1981 RECOMMENDATION The Planning Department recommends that Tentative Tract Map AT 810320 : 2 be revised to provide a maximum of seven lots with an average lot size of 3 . 3 acres. In the event the Planning Commission approves the applicant 's request for a nine lot subdivision, the following findings and conditions are recommended: FINDINGS 1 . The application as submitted conforms to the applicable zoning and subdivision regulations and is consistent with the 1980 Atascadero General Plan. 2 . The application as submitted together with conditions of approval will not have a significant adverse effect upon the environment and therefore, the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report • is not necessary. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Issuance of a Conditional Negative Declaration as follows: 1. Provision shall be made to preserve as many walnut trees as feasible during and after construction. 2 . Adequate provision shall be made to reduce fire hazard at the site. 3. Adequate provision shall be made for drainage and erosion control in conjunction with site development. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Approval of Tentative Tract Map AT 810320 :2 subject to the following conditions : 1. Private sewage disposal systems will be an acceptable method of sewage disposal, if reports , tests , and design are acceptable. All tests , reports, and designs shall conform to methods and guidelines prescribed by the Manual of Septic Tank Practice and • other applicable City ordinances. The following shall appear as a Note on the Final Map: Page Seven • Re : Tentative Tract Map AT 810320:2 (Yeomans) August 17 , 1981 - FOR SANTA CRUZ ROAD: 20 ' paved section with two feet of graded shoulder on each side of paving. - FOR GARCIA ROAD: 20 ' paved section with two feet of graded shoulder on each side of paving. - FOR UNNAMED CUL-DE-SAC: 22 ' paved section with 45 ' radius bulb turnaround per standard draw- ing A-8 . 6 . Improvements to be constructed under an inspection agreement and encroachment permit issued by the Public Works Department. a. Improvement drawings, including improvements to control drainage and erosion within the road right-of-way, shall be submitted to the Public Works Department for review and approval prior to recordation of the Final Map. b. The applicant may enter into an agreement to defer instal- lation of Santa Cruz Road, Garcia Road and the unnamed cul-de-sac, for period not to exceed three years . Any . such agreement shall include a bond, certificate of de- posit or similar improvement guarantee acceptable to the Public Works Director. 7 . An additional five (5) foot of dedication shall be provided along the property frontage of Santa Cruz and Garcia Roads . An offer of dedication shall also be made for the full width of the unnamed cul-de-sac. Offers of dedication shall be so indicated on the Final Map. 8 . The subject roads or dedications shall be formally offered for dedication by the actual easement owners. A title report, together with legal descriptions for the roads , shall accompany the offers of dedication prior to recordation of the Final Map. 9 . Drainage and erosion control plans in conjunction with all road improvements required herein shall be submitted for review and approval by the Public Works Department prior to recordaion of the Final Map. a. Additional drainage and erosion control plans, also prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer, shall be submitted for re- view and approval by the Planning and Public Works Depart- ments prior to issuance of building permits in conjunction with the installation of private driveways. A note to this • effect shall be placed on the Final Map. Page Eight • Re : Tentative Tract Map AT 810320 :2 (Yeomans) August 17 , 1981 10 . Location of private driveways for each parcel shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Department at the time of building permits. Plan and profile drawings of proposed driveways may be required in order to determine average grade and appropriate improvement requirements. a. No driveway will be allowed which exceeds 20% in slope. b. If average slope exceeds 12% , paved improvement would be a requirement at the time of application for a building permit. C. An all-weather surface will be required similarly for slopes not exceeding 12%. d. Private driveways shall be improved to a minimum width of twelve (12) feet with an unobstructed vertical clearance of fourteen (14) feet. • These notes shall appear on the Final Map. 11. Effort shall be made to minimize grading that would be disruptive to the natural topography and removal of existing, mature trees . The following shall appear as a Note on the Final Map: "No trees shall be removed without compliance with applicable City ordinances. Removal of walnut trees shall be limited to that necessary to clear a building site for a residence, out buildings, and yards, provided the area cleared shall not exceed a total area of 1/2 acre of any lot. No grading shall commence without an appropriate permit and compliance with applicable City ordinances. " 12 . All pipeline, utility easements and other easements of record shall be shown on the Final Map. A letter shall be submitted from each utility company indicating the nature and extent of any building restrictions . A note stating such restrictions shall appear as a Note on the Final Map. a. Provision shall be made . for additional public utility easements as necessary for proposed utilities. b. Special mention shall be noted for the Diablo and Morro Bay-Gates easement affecting Lots 7 ,8 , and 9 . • 13 . The applicant shall request a road name for the unnamed cul-de- sac prior to the recordation of the Final Map, which complies with the following requirements: • • Page Nine Re: Tentative Tract Map AT 810320 :2 (Yeomans) August 17, 1981 a. All road names shall be of Spanish origin or shall be the names of non-living persons of historical importance . b. Road names shall not be duplicative of nor similar to other road names within the City of Atascadero or in the nearby unincorporated areas of San Luis Obispo County. 14 . The applicant shall submit a copy of the recorded easement document for that private driveway portion which crosses parcels 4 and 5 at their northeasterly corners or shall eliminate said encroachment. 15. Roof coverings for all structures shall be Class C rating or better and a Note to that effect shall appear on the Final Map. 16 . A Final Parcel Map in compliance with all conditions set forth herein shall be submitted for review and approval in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City Lot Division Ordinance prior to recordation. a. Monuments shall be set at all new property corners created . and a Registered Civil Engineer or licensed land surveyor shall submit a letter certifying that the monuments have been set prior to recordation. b. A Final title policy (CLIA or ALTA) shall be submitted for review in conjunction with the processing of the Final Map. 17 . Approval of this Tentative Tract Map shall expire eighteen months from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted pursuant to a written request prior to the expiration date. ACTION The Planning Commission should direct Staff as deemed appropriate. TO APPROVE : Motion to adopt findings and set conditions . TO DENY: Motion setting findings for denial. REPORT PREPARED BY: MARY E. 1EATIE Asso ate Plan r REPORT APPROVED BY : G � - • LAWRENCE STEVENS Planning Director /Ps C, IC5 v �6 Yo .. co N 0 LJ icr f o -t000-72SO SANTA CRUL Lots 28-3I BLOCK 50 8103Z.o:.Z K000-7 � 250 SANTA CRuZ LOTS 28-31 Bt-Ocl< 50 w M co co ? p \ gr N L O � N N N N N N M t ! N N U) N ea pI m - ,N z LO r- a yy ' 3 � b `• • N � A _ r }rte'• N t'. s r• LO } / }, tea. t z' � � �, �� .+,. � •.�. ..•S uz` • ` va ¢ l M - y \`` M z G V N N Q tio�2 ehe� � I W pie 'S 3 �x 77 1� e� IZE ° $ / j i W Z o P i r NA l� f Y r + fE M 0 R A N D U M r � 10TO: CITY MANAGER August 18 , 1981 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 0810707 : 1 LOCATION: Via Avenue near Atascadero Creek APPLICANT : McKeen Enterprises (Brannon) REQUEST: To allow landscaped parking in the required front yard in an M-1 Zone for a 2385 sq . ft. industrial building On August 17 , 1981 the Planning Commission conducted apublic hearing on the request unanimously adopting Findings 1-4 , adopted a Condition- al Negative Declaration and approving the project subject to Condi- tions 1 -19 as listed in the attached Staff Report with the deletion of Conditions 2b and 2c concerning architectural treatment to the build- ing. There was some discussion by the Commission concerning the possibility of extending sewer lines to serve the property, concerning the condi- tions requiring minor upgrading of exterior building treatment and concerning the blocking of access now used by the adjacent use (Jol • ley ' s Auto Dismantling) . David Brannon , applicant ' s architect , pointed out a number of site constraints that resulted in the proposed design indicating the neces- sity to allow parking in the front yard . He also requested that Con- dition 2b (requiring minor upgrading of architectural features by extending proposed fascia treatment) be deleted . Mr . Brannon indica- ted that all of the remaining conditions were acceptable. Beth Jolley and Bill Vetter , operator and owner of adjacent property, objected to the proJect because it would create excess 'traffic in an area where there were existing circulation problems . They indicated that they felt the sewer line should be extended to serve the property due to the proximity of the Creek and objected to the setbacks on the basis that the County had previously required a larger setback for their building. There was also some discussion concerning their use of a portion of the applicant ' s property. No one else appeared on the matter . • LAWRENCE STEVENS MUR AY . WARDEN Planning Director Ci y N nager f �. nlrfr_jr. IFIlr. CITY OF ATASCADERO rou 14)79; 1 r, r . r' Planning Department August 17 , 1981 STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit U810707: 1 LOCATION: At Via Avenue, near Atascadero Creek APPLICANT: McKeen Enterprises (David Brannon) REQUEST: To all landscaped parking in the required front yard in an M-1 zone for a 2385 sq. ft. industrial building BACKGROUND 1. Existing Zoning: M-1 2. General Plan: Industrial Park 3. Environmental Determination: An initial study environmental description form has been completed for the project. The Planning Director has prepared a Conditional Negative • Declaration indicating the project will not have a significant adverse effect upon the environment if certain mitigating measures are incorporated into the project. 4. Site Conditions: The site is generally flat and is situated in front of a portion of Jolley' s Auto Dismantling business . The site Jolley' s is bordered on the east by the Atascadero Creek. There are no significant trees or other vegetation on the site. City water is available to the site, city sewer is not. No curb gutter or sidewalk exists along the property's Via Avenue frontage. At the present time Jolley's utilizes most of the subject site for access and parking for employees and some cars out of service. 5. Project Description: The applicant is proposing to construct a 2385 square foot masonry building for undetermined industrial uses. Site plans indicate the building to be divided into two rental warehouse spaces , generally of equal size. A total of eight 9 ' X 20 ' and one handicapped 12 ' X 20 ' spaces are proposed. Access to the site is provided by two driveways off Via Avenue. Landscaping is proposed primarily around the parking areas and an enclosed trash storage area is provided near the southerly rental unit. Plans also indicate an unimproved area to the rear • Page Two Re: Conditional UWermit U810707 : 1 August 17 , 1981 • (northeast) and side (southeast) of the building. An on-site septic system is located in the northerly corner of the site. Building finishes include stucco fascia with slumpstone exterior walls, steel anodized window frames, some wood siding and metal overhead doors. Roof design is flat. STAFF COMMENTS Section 22. 54 . 040 Special Requirements of the zoning ordinance under Light Industrial Districts provides as follows : " (5) All required yards shall either be opened landscaped with green areas or be left in a natural state. Areas left in a natural state shall be maintained in a slightly and well kept condition. Landscaped parking areas within required yard areas may be permitted subject to first securing a Conditional Use Permit. " Section 22 . 52. 030 Yard Areas provides as follows: " (1) Front Yard: Fifty feet from the centerline of any street right-of-way which is intended for public. Via Avenue is a 50 foot right-of-way. The zoning ordinance does not provide standards for required parking • in an M-1 zone where the exact nature of business is unknown. It does specify that warehouses provide one space per each two employees plus 100 of that number more and an additional space per each company vehicles. Of course details such as this are unknown by the applicant. Looking at other M-1 uses parking requirements vary from one space per 100 sq. ft. for wrecking and junk yards to one space per 500 sq. ft. for assembly and manufacturing plants . The applicant has provided one space per 265 sq . ft. of floor area which seems reasonable. However, the applicant should clearly understand that any use which applies to locate--on this-property -with--;more intensive parking needs than can be met by the proposed parking would be denied. There is also concern over the proposed building location and its proximity to the top of the Atascadero Creek bank. Staff would suggest slope protection measures during and after construction to reduce slope failure and control sedimentation. No construction activity would be allowed on or beyond the top of the bank. FINDINGS 1. The application for this project conforms to the applicable zoning regulations and is consistent with the 1980 Atascadero • Plan. Page Three Re: Conditional 0 Permit U810707 :1 August 17 , 1981 2. The proposed project should not have an adverse effect on abutting property or the permitted use thereof. 3. The conditions established are necessary to assure that the proposed project will be reasonably compatible with existing and future uses in the area. 4. Implementation of the project as proposed should not result in any adverse environmental impacts. RECOMMENDATION Based on the above findings , the Planning Department recommends : A. Issuance of a Conditional Negative Declaration as follows : 1. Provision shall be made to unsure adequate protection of the creek bank during and after construction. B. Approval of Conditional Use Permit U810707 :1 subject to the following conditions : 1. Site development includina buildings., parking, landscaping- lighting and signing as required and other features shall be consistent with the site plans submitted together with modifications required by conditions which follow. • a. Revised plans shall be submitted as necessary to the Planning Department for review and final approval to insure compliance with all conditions herein. 2 . Building architecture shall be consistent with elevations submitted together with the following: a. Any roof mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened from view from adjacent properties and streets in a manner approved by the Planning Department. b. The north elevation shall be revised to provide for extension of fascia treatment across the front of rental space #2 (as indicated on site plan) . The exterior wall of the trash enclosure need be only a minimum of 5 feet high. C. The stucco fascia shall be painted or otherwise treated to contrast with the slumpstone block. Metal overhead doors and wood siding shall also be painted or treated with color coordinated with the rest of the building. • Page Four . Re: Conditional UA�Permit U810707 :1 August 17 , 1981 • 3. Submit two copies of detailed landscaping and irrigation plans indicating size, type and spacing of plant materials for review and approval by the Planning Department prior to issuance of building permits. a. Raised concrete curbs or similar shall border each planter area where it abuts parking or driveway areas. b. Plant materials shall be sized to achieve a mature appearance within three years . C. The type of irrigation system shall depend upon the plant materials used and their watering needs. 4. Submit two sets of grading and drainage plans indicating grade of building pads, pavement elevations, flow-lines at top of curb, etc. , for review and approval by the Public Works Department prior to issuance of any permits . a. Drainage from the site shall not be allowed to flow directly to adjacent property or across any public sidewalks or driveways. 5. The project shall be connected to the community water system. Submit evidence from the Atascadero Mutual Water Company • indicating that they are willing and able to provide service prior to issuance of building permit. 6 . Private sewage disposal systems will be an acceptable method of sewage disposal if reports, tests , and design are acceptable. All tests, reports and design shall conform to methods and quidelines perscribed by the Manual of Septic Tank Practice and other applicable City ordinances. 7. On-site signing shall be limited to an aggregate area of sixty (60) square feet and not to exceed the height of the building unless a Conditional Use Permit is secured. 8. Lighting fixtures shall not project above the roof of the building and all lighting shall be designed to minimize on-site and off-site glare. 9 . Provide a minimum of nine (9) parking spaces generally as shown on the site plan. Parking and access areas shall be paved with minimum 2" AC on adequate base and spaces shall be paint striped. (,,;heel stops or approved functional equivalent shall be provided. a. All parking spaces shall be a minimum of 9 ' X 20 ' except for the handicapped space which shall be 12 feet in is width and all spaces shall have a minimum 24 foot turning radius behind each space. Page Five • Re: Conditional & Permit U810707 :1 August 17 , 1981 b. Parking spaces may be reduced in depth approximately three (3) feet where adjacent to sidewalks and planters with sidewalks and planters widened correspondingly thereby eliminating the need for wheel stops. C. Each driveway opening shall be a minimum of 24 feet in width. An encroachment permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Department prior to its installation. 10 . A temporary fence or similar protective barrier shall be erected along the top of the creek bank and shall be in place prior to commencement of any construction activity for the purpose of protecting against damage to the bank and prevention of erosion and sedimentation into Atascadero Creek. 11. All new utilities and utility connections shall be placed underground. 12 . Provide a paved and enclosed trash storage area as shown: Exterior wall of storage area may be reduced to five (5) feet in height. 13. Install concrete curb, gutter and sidewalk along the Via Avenue frontage of the subject property as required by • Title 19 . Said improvements to be constructed under an inspection agreement and encroachment permit issued by the Public Works Department. a. Applicant shall contact the Public Works Department to obtain improvement drawings for Via Avenue on file. 14 . The property owner shall be responsible for maintaining the rear and side yard areas in a sightly manner, Accumulation of trash or loose debris is prohibited. 15. Applicant shall install permanent fencing along the rear property line of a type and design acceptable to the Planning Department. Fence details and elevations shall be approved by the Planning Department at the time of building permit. 16 . Any existing encroachments (i.e. , fences , structures, cars etc. ) shall be removed in conjunction with the issuance of building permits. 17. In the event that archaeological resources are discovered at the site during construction of this project, said resources are to remain undisturbed after discovery and construction activity shall cease immediately. The Planning Department is to be notified so that proper disposition of the resources . may be accomplished. Page Six Re : Conditional U*Permit U810707 :1 August 17 , 1981 • 18. This Conditional Use Permit approval is ranted for a maximum PP g period of one year from the date of final approval unless an extension is granted by the Planning Director pursuant to a written request filed a minimum of ten days prior to the expiration date. 19 . All conditions of approval established herein shall be complied with prior to occupancy. ACTION The Planning Commission should by motion direct Staff as deemed appropriate. TO APPROVE: Motion to adopt findings and set conditions . TO DENY: Motion setting findings for denial. REPORT PREPARED BY: C •/ MARY EEATIE Ass cia e Plan er REPORT APPROVED BY: &10, • LAWRENCE STEVENS Planning Director • A V Q a TRAFFI C r O / SII°5°W- i1 J09.87 39.0/ S29°OS'W 223.25 169.72 f=573.10 1 41.68 1 1 I y I I t mro I u f Z� = IU N v�9im O f 00 q0 IFo c+`O U N n i ulp u � E1 qa W ul 215 -Z, ---------- S23'05W .S23 05W 305. 126.21 2 m }4.7.78 N3a°5 F e�N• i= '��, m u p VIP, •so v N.23_I5'30'E.-_ W6 '. N, �/-Y_f1 . 161.72 Nv A Sa lJ- � vA eo rn 2 y m C y 3:0 N N r mmvi s1" y rfri t K' L `V NO. IA cn 06 pt C® �� 3j�I'E• �(=y`` N So. a �tis�. R 9 `� PARK y9 1s = Z { N3 43 073 3S _ 2/ F 374.56 NII°30 R. 6.J3• a 7 C:b nE�IJC'C AD R•818.6p :28660 CTJt n iC)r A•_ Z ! nmox m rn�- N o Z nobZm o g VIG/N/T y MAP U6010 70 7:n I V770,00 t3 '} 1Q LI 12 .if,9 e3 I (3 8 9 P-24 664 � A ,� 12 66 6 Y Y PAS' 13 61 66 Jr 1 155, 14 $ 60 67 16 58 59 68 ' 1 69 s> 19 49 50 51 52 ss �t ��• �� ' 20 s s 5 /. 48 53 , v ' 4•1 16 6oS�r ' 30 ti� 30 r a a cv — 39 �9 78 4 r 0 /.i 8 `� d 8 30-C ;2 37 .V3 8? 31 a m 36 ` b4 _ � 85 / M M 8 34 6 / • r 35 393& O 38 � ds 15 3 / 14 3/-30 a� k 2 2 ?ark :o / 36 23 ^� j 4 a p S 2S Par.A C) 1/ v-3eZ f �;� LEGEND J ,0 CO- 65-8 19 2a 3/ 4� CO-66-26' 2/ 3G > ,l8 : CO- 66-38 J�9 �9 G CO-6--6I S 3g 32 \\syr 4 23 Q`P 9 CO-66-87 30 3 0 28 \16140&Z8 Yl 12 - , , ZpN/iVG M•4F' ° Q> yp 08/0707: / �! I r0 i; { n J z fr. 1� ♦3 u p n C- I „oaou»o r 0 ,�` • / tpia J li- 5 nn I' Z t Ia Y 04 ul 3- zth J i 7"'! fZ4 rLl'W _RQII' - O1 U3/0707: / w JOB ^: 7fC PIAN n•ee CtN CNTCYrKl+a _ SCA P�GVATONb I "s _ISS twoar� D+Z, J,D. BRANNON, ARCHITECT SCALE"%'��'-0' VIVGW�IT HAO ..SAN w. (�,n:.1 GA. gSbl a O f OR AWN AO- AATe C^rlrWIA z ■ CHECKED m REVISED 086 PMMO 6T SAN L.LM OSMPO. CALIF.63401 A WAKCH04'>'. KLNTA L CALp.860.f C-10883 [606)643-7878 TA Ay:.NuG ATA6[.AGC1.Q CA�� i Y ffi M E M O R A N D U M TO: CITY MANAGER August 18 , 1981 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR ' SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT U810608 : 1 LOCATION: 5830 Entrada APPLICANT : Mary Pulsifer REQUEST: To allow a dog grooming business with ' a residence on the ground floor On July 27 , 1981 the City Council reviewed the request and referred it back to the Planning Commission to consider the need for landscaping consistent with other commercial development in thereon. On August 17 , 1981 the Planning Commission-conducted a - public hearing to reconsider the matter of landscaping and , with Commissioners Lilley, LaPrade and Carroll dissenting, approved the addition of Condition #8 (requiring a landscape plan for • Staff level approval) as listed in the August 17 memo. There was some discussion among the Commission concerning the need for and appropriateness of landscaping. The dissenting Commissioners felt that a landscape plan review was only necessary if parking improvements were placed in the front yard area. The majority determined that minor upgrading and improved maintenance was necessary. Mary Pulsifer , applicant , indicated a desire to upgrade the prop- erty and did not object to the landscape plan. Joe Grisanti , adjacent business owner , spoke in support of the applicant ' s efforts . No one else appeared on the matter . VA� LAWRENCE STEVENS MU AY . WARDEN Planning Director C ' ty anager • M E M O R A N D U M TO: PLANNING COMMISSION August 17 , 1981 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit U810608 :1 LOCATION: 5830 Entrada Avenue APPLICANT: Mary Pulsifer (Briarwood Management Company) REQUEST: To allow a dog grooming business with a residence on the ground floor. This matter was first considered on July 20 , 1981 at which time the Planning Commission moved to approve the request subject to certain conditions per the attached Staff Report with the modification that "no portable or window signs are allowed and existing such signs are to be removed. Wall signs are to be mounted parallel to the street and flush to the building. " The matter was forwarded to the City Council as a Consent Calendar • item at their meeting of July 27 , 1981 at which time it was re- ferred back to the Planning Commission to consider the need for landscaping consistent with other commercial development in the area. Staff review of this matter has determined that some minor upgrading and maintenance of existing landscaping on the property would not be an unreasonable request. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Department recommends that Condition #8 be added to the Conditional Use Permit approval which would read as follows : "8 . Applicant shall submit a detailed landscaping and irrigation plan indicating the type, size and spacing of plant materials both existing and proposed. a. Effort shall be made to upgrade the appearance of the existing yards by providing additional landscaping to- gether with improved maintenance. " • Page Two Re: Conditional Use Permit U810608 :1 (Pulsifer) August 17 , 1981 ACTION The Planning Commission should by motion direct Staff as deemed appropriate. TO APPROVE: Motion to adopt Condition #8 . TO DENY: Motion setting findings for denial. REPORT PREPARED BY : �. MARY E. jqEATIE AssociatV Planner REPORT APPROVED BY LAWRENCE STEVENS Planning Director /ps • CITY OF ATASCADERO X91 a r r j r1 r1� 1979Planning Department July 20 , 1981 • STAFF -REPORT SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit U810608 :1 LOCATION: 5830 Entrada Avenue (Lot 20 & 21, Block NF) APPLICANT: Vary Pulsifer (dba: Fipi Gi ' s Boutique) REQUEST: To allow establishment of a commercial dog grooming business in conjunction with an existing residential use located on .the ground floor BACKGROUND 1. Existing Zoning : C-1-C 2 . General Plan: Retail Commercial - -- 3. Environmental Determination : The Planning Director has deter- mined the application as presented to be a Class 1 (a) Categorical Exemption from the requirements of the California Environmental • Quality Act. 4 . Site Conditions : The site is currently developed with a residential structure with garage and induced landscaping. The site is flat and surrounded by similar mixed residential and commercial land uses . The site is bordered on the rear (northwest) by a dead end alley, and on the front (southeast) by Entrada Avenue. Adjacent to the southwest is Grisanti Hardware. Curb, gutter and sidewalk exist along the Entrada Avenue frontage. 5 . Project Description : The applicant is proposing to convert a portion of an existing residential structure for use as a commercial dog grooming business (approximately 300 square feet) ; the remaining portion of the structure would be main- tained as a residence. Parking is proposed to be provided in the alley to the rear of the property. Parking is available for the residence in the two car attached garage with a drive- way to Entrada. minor interior modifications , including partitioned walls (or securing existing doors between the uses) , are proposed to accommodate conversion to commercial use and provide for a physical separation. • (0 (� Page Two Re: Conditional Use Permit U810608 :1 (Pulsifer) July 20, 1981 STAFF COMMENTS It is necessary that the proposed project provide for adequate off-street parking. In order to provide that parking, it is suggested that the attached garage be retained for parking in conjunction with the residential use. A total of one space per 500 sq. ft. plus one space per each two employees would be re- quired for the commercial use. Assuming that the applicant would not have any employees, only one space would be necessary for the proposed commercial square-footage (322 sq. ft. ) . In the event the applicant does have employees, additional spaces would be required. Chapter 22. 40 , C-•1-C (Community Shopping) District-Section 22 .40 . 020 Conditional Uses, permits residential uses on the giound floor. Section 22-: 40. 010 permits pet shops and supplies. Perhaps concern should also be expressed regarding the desirability of a mixed residential and commercial uses in the downtown business area - at least as a long term issue. It may, for example, be more • appropriate to encourage improvement of the area by considering more substantial renovation and exclusively commercial uses to facilitate development in the area. It should, however, be noted that the proposed project can comply with applicable regulations and the minor improvements may not be a deterrent to future im- provement efforts. It should also be pointed out that there is an emerging trend in support of mixing residential uses into downtown areas to conserve energy and increase all-day activity. FINDINGS 1. The application for this project conforms to the applicable zoning regulations and is consistent with the-1980 Atascadero General Plan. 2. The proposed project should not have an adverse effect on abutting property or the permitted use thereof. 3. The conditions established are necessary to assure that the proposed project will be reasonably compatible with existing and future uses in the area. i Page Three • Re: Conditional Use Permit U810608 :1 (Pulsifer) July 20 , 1981 RECOMMENDATION Based upon the above findings, the Planning Department recommends approval of Conditional Use Permit U810608 :1 subject to the follow- ing conditions : 1. Site development to be consistent with the plans submitted including any modifications as required by conditions which follow. 2. Provide a revised site plan indicating the number of off-street parking spaces as required by Chapter 22 . 86 . 050 of the Zoning Ordinance. Design and layout of said spaces to be approved by the Planning Department. a. Required parking spaces and driveways shall be provided with 2" AC paving over adequate base; individual parking spaces shall be paint striped or otherwise indicated and provided with concrete wheel stops or approved functional equivalent. b. Tandem parking in the driveway or parking spaces which • back directly into Entrada are prohibited in complying with the requirements for customer parking, C. The existing fence along the alley may be required to be modified depending upon the design and layout of parking spaces. 3. The applicant shall obtain a building permit for any interior remodeling in conjunction with the conversion including new partitions, electrical and plumbing. a. Business license will not be issued until building permit is finaled. b. The existing restrooms will be adequate provided that the operator of the business is also the occupant of the residence. If a change in that situation occurs , a build- ing permit shall be obtained to modify the floor plan to provide direct access to a restroom for the business . In conjunction with that change , the restroom shall be modified to provide for requirements for the physically handicapped. C. In conjunction with changing a portion of the building to a commercial occupancy, provision shall be made for access for • the physically handicapped as provided in the Uniform Build- ing Code to the commercial portion of the building. d. County Health Department approval shall be secured. • Page Four Re : Conditional Use Permit U810608 :1 (Pulsifer) July 20 , 1981 4 . On-site signing shall be limited to an aggregate area of 60 square feet for the entire project, and shall not exceed the height of the building. All signing to be reviewed and ap- proved by the Planning Department. Flashing, rotating or wind activated devices are prohibited. Signs on buildings shall be mounted flush with the building face. 5. The floor area used for the commercial business may not be expanded without prior review and approval by the Planning Department. 6 . This Conditional Use Permit is granted for a period of one (1) year from the date of final approval to allow establishment of the proposed use unless an extension is granted by the Planning Director pursuant to a written request filed a minimum of ten (10) days prior to the expiration date. 7 . All conditions of approval established herein shall be complied with within 30 days of the date of final approval. • ACTION The Planning Commission should by motion direct Staff as deemed appropriate. TO APPROVE : Motion to adopt findings and set conditions . TO DENY: Motion setting findings for denial. REPORT PREPARED BY : MARY E. i EATIE Associate Planner REPORT APPROVED BY: LAWRENCE STEVENS Planning Director • /Ps 18 9 1 -r� 7S 31 LA 19 L H 2 30 44 3 2012 � ® '4 5 29 Qom, 3 z 4-- P s n 9 22 23 24 14 47 28 / P-535 Iy3 48 tC7o:�3p v 49 2 16 50, 1 _ . 12 17 11 12 J _ �!liop. 23 �\o� •c,,,90� V t 32 :1137 14 • :�; ';�'.'':•. � c' e..�. O 4 /p • 22 c 2�4 ��q • :Q'� y S' 94 ?b Qv ' 2 2 6 G) o . 9 • i T � Q\ ' WAJIA�6 V- 111CIA)l 7V I —E ci _ ALLEN i O • �zZ� I mAo r----------------i :p-iP 1 - I „I. iI � SQA , z go s o o ENTt3ADf _ 6/7E PGl1rJv 20'— i , Io f 8 CA t Iq I 1p 71 _.- �. _. crass: ' x fT i Lo J - � 4 '. jj� ✓\ _ "rte f �N� N ADD i i r l e . Page Four • Minutes - Atascadero Planning Commission - Regular Meeting July 20 , 1981 Ruth Peattie, Country Club Drive resident, expressed concern that the property might not be maintained as well if it was converted. She also wondered why the apartments were being converted since they were normally full. George Molina spoke in opposition to the conversion because of past representations that the project was government assisted, because the conversion was too soon, and because it placed an unfair burden on taxpayers . There was some discussion among the Commission relative to the purpose of CC&Rs and concerning the impact of this and other conversions on the rental market. The Commission also discussed the grading/storage area violations . MOTION: Commissioner Cannon moved to approve Tentative Tract 999 subject to Conditions 108 as listed in the Staff - Report with an additional condition to read: "9 . The storage space created under a portion of • Building #4 shall be eliminated prior to re- cordation of the Final Map. " Commissioner Lilley seconded the motion and it was carried unanimously. 4 . Public hearing on Conditional Use Permit U810608 :1 to allow dog grooming business with residence on ground floor on Lots 20 and 21 of Block MD at 5830 Entrada - Mary Pulsifer Mrs . Beatie presented the Staff Report on this Use Permit recommending approval. There was brief discussion among the Commission concerning off-street parking and possible layouts for the project. Discussion also occurred concerning the existing signs for the business. Mary Pulsifer, applicant, spoke in support of the request. She asked if it would be possible to place the parking in front of the business . Mr. Stevens indicated that option could be explored. Mike Cox, property manager, inquired about the 30 day notice • in completing the requirements indicating that time frame may be difficult. Mr. Stevens stated that as long as steady pro- gress was made, there would be no problem if the time extended beyond the 30 day period. Page Five • Minutes - Atascadero Planning Commission - Regular Meeting July 20, 1981 MOTION: Commissioner Oglesby moved to approve Conditional Use Permit U810608 :1 subject to Conditions 1-7 as listed in the Staff Report with modification to Condition #4 to read as follows : "a. No portable or window signs are allowed and existing such signs are to be removed. Wall signs are to be mounted parallel to the street and flush to the building. " Acting Chairman Summers seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. C. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION 1. Planning Commission - Commissioner Oglesby expressed concern over the amount of merchants who display their merchandise on the sidewalks, thereby creating a possible safety hazard. Discussion • ensued on this item. MOTION: Commissioner Oglesby moved to direct Staff to in- vestigate sidewalk encroachment in the downtown business area. Commissioner Cannon seconded the motion and it carried with Commissioner Lilley dissenting. There was further discussion relating to Commissioner Lilley' s objection to limiting the area to one part of the City. MOTION: Commissioner Oglesby moved to direct Staff to in- vestigate sidewalk encroachments in all parts of the City. Commissioner Cannon seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. 2 . Planning Director Mr. Stevens provided the Commission with an update on the status of the zoning ordinance . Meeting adjourned at 9 :30 p.m. RECORDED BY : • PATRICIA SHEPPHARD Planning Department Secretary APPROVED BY: LAWRENCE STEVENS Planning Director 0 CITY COUNCIL MINU& - JULY 27 , 1981 8 . Tentative Parcel Map AT 78-121 , 8900 San Gabriel , Catherine Lewis (Hilliard) approval of one year time extension to enable completion of road requirements and approval of road name request for road common to this application and AT 78-164 (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) 9 . Lot Line Adjustment LA 810611 : 1 , 7313 and 7345 San Gregorio , Florence Desrosier-Henry Ranellette (Stewart) to adjust existing lot lne to resolve encroachment problem (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) 10 . Tentative Parcel Map AT 78-164 , 8920 San Gabriel , Elizabeth C . Davis (Hilliard) approval of one year time extension to enable completion of road requirements and approval of road name request for road common to this application and AT 78-121 (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) 11 . Tentative Tract Map 999 , 5525 Capistrano, RPI-V - A Limited Partnership .(Walker/Lundberg) ` to allow conversion of 44 existing apartment units into air-space , condominiums (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS) 12 . Conditional Use Permit U810608 : 1 , 5830 Entrada , Mary Pulsifer (dba: Bipi Gi ' s Botique) to allow establishment of a commerical dog grooming business in conjunction with an existing resident on the ground floor (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) Mayor Wilkins reviewed all items on the Consent Calendar . Councilman Highland stated that he had a correction on page five of the minutes of July 13th regarding the Men ' s Colony expansion . He did not make the statements about the County already doing its part to provide State penal facilities ; he only agreed with the contention that the State be required to file an EIR . It was agreed that paragraph 2 of that section be deleted . Councilman Mackey wished to have item A-12 withdrawn from the Consent Calendar and considered separately. MOTION : Councilmn Highland moved for adoption of the Consent Calendar as amended , with the exception of item A-12 . The motion was seconded by Councilman Stover and unanimously carried by roll call vote. A-12 Conditional ' Use Permit U810608 : 1 , 5830 Entrada , Mary Pulsifer Councilman Mackey was concerned about the landscaping on this property; she asked if some conditions could be imposed to require improving the appearance of the property. Larry Stevens , Planning 2 M E M O R A N D U M • TO: CITY MANAGER` August 18 , 1981 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: Business License U-Win Card Room - 5940 E1 Camino Real An application has been filed by Richard Christensen and Lydia Schaefer (DBA: U-Win Card Room) for a City business license to change the licensee for an existing card room at the above lo- cation . The business license ordinance requires anew license in those cases and approval by the Planning Department, the Finance Department , the Police Department, and the City Council is needed for card rooms . ' A recommendation for approval has been made by each of the above Departments. Prior to issuing the li- cense, Council approval is necessary. Council should be aware that the applicants intend to operate two • card tables at the location. There are some plans for additional tables in the future but this will be limited by the available floor area in the building to only minor expansion. The recommendation for approval of the business is supported by the following: - satisfactory background investigation results :for both new licenses - business has been in existence (under prior license) since April 7 , 1978 - no reported problems with the business in the past LAWRENCE STEVENS *Ua�/WARDENPlanning Director ager _M_E_M_0_R_A_N_D_U`M_ TO: City Council FROM: City Manager SUBJECT: Claim of Jack Townsend The attached claim is forwarded for your denial pursuant to the recommendation of Carl Warren and Company, insurance ad- justers for the Joint Powers Authority. Denial of the claim allows the applicant to pursue legal remedies if he so desires and , since there is a dispute as to the responsibility of the City, it allows the City, through its insurance carr-ier , to dis- pute the alleged claim. • Recommend your disapproval of the claim. We will send a letter citing the appropriate legal requirements to the appli- cant . MUS RAY MWARDEN MLW: ad 8-20-81 i RECEIVE0:APR 3 0 198 i i CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES TO THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, CITY COUNCIL, CITY MANAGER, ATASCADERO POLICE DEPARTMENT, THE CHIEF OF POLICE AND 'OFFICER ROBERT HOWARD: Jack Henry Townsend whose address is P.O. Box 621, Creston, Cali- fornia 93432 , hereby makes his claim against the above named for damages and injuries suffered by this Claimant on January 31 , 1981 , in the City of Atascadero as the result of Claimant' s false arrest and imprisonment as well as the use of unnecessary violent force upon the Claimant by Officer Robert F. Howard. As a direct and proximate result of Officer Howard ' s unnecessary drawing and pointing a deadly weapon at Claimant, violently pull- ing and twisting the arm of Claimant and as the result of Claimant ' s arrest under such circumstances as would indicate that an arrest and imprisonment was not necessary nor proper, Claimant suffered extreme and profound mental suffering and anguish along with cer- tain physical injuries including but not necessarily limited to strained and sprained muscles and damage to certain nerves in the arm of claimant all of which Claimant believes will lead to some permanent impairment to Claimant. As a direct and proximate result of the unlawful and wrongful conduct of Officer Howard as set forth above, the Claimant was required to obtain medical care and he will in the future require medical and related care the exact cost of which is unknown to Claimant at the present time. The Claimant estimates that his medical and other related expenses will exceed two thousand dollars ($2 ,000. 00) and that his general damages will exceed $50, 000. 00. Claimant also makes a claim for punitive damages as the result of the intentional conduct on the part of Officer Howard, in the sum of $25 , 000. 00. Dated: April , 1981. t JA,QK p WN E 11Y M E M O R A N D U M TO: City Council FROM: City Manager SUBJECT: Agreement with Senior Citizens , Inc . for financial assistance Attached is an, agreement which has been reviewed and signed by the Senior Citizens and the City Attorney. Basically, this agreement provides for making payments to the Seniors on a monthly basis in response to reports provided by ,the Seniors re- garding their monthly operational and vehicle costs .' If you approve of this format, I_ would ask that you authorize • the City Manager to enter into similar agreements with the other agencies allocated funds for this fiscal year; i .e. , Hotline, San Luis Obispo County Symphony, People ' s Self-Help Housing, Family Services and AFAR. Most of the agreement3 will provide for pay- ments during the year to the agencies in response to reports of services rendered to the citizens of Atascadero. MU RAY . WARDEN M W: d 8-20-81 • AGREEMENT This Agreement , dated August 4 , 1981 , is made and entered into by and between the City of Atascadero, a municipal corporation here- inafter referred to as "City" , and the Senior Citizens United , Inc . , of Atascadero, Garden Farms , Santa Margarita and Templeton, here- inafter referred to as the "Seniors" . The City has provided , as part of the Fiscal Year 1981-82 Budget , the following financial support for the Seniors per their request: Vehicle Insurance $ 568 .00 Vehicle Costs 2 , 376 .00 Operating Costs 27400 . 00 TOTAL $5 , 344.00 The City will pay approximately $568 .00 toward acquiring vehicle insurance on only one Senior vehicle, a Ford Station Wagon , 1968 model , I .D. 8J1F132856 . This payment will be made when request for such funds is received from the County of San Luis Obispo, adminis- trator of the County-wide insurance program for senior vehicles. The- Seniors shall advise the City in writing in the event the above named vehicle is sold , abandoned , or replaced . The City will pay $ . 33 cents per mile up to 600 miles per month for a Senior vehicle operating soley within the City limits and for the transportation of persons who are in need of personal assistance and not served by the Atascadero Dial-A-Ride system. Seniors shall provide the City with a report showing and certifying the miles tra- veled in each month within the City limits in meeting specialized handling needs not met through the Dial-A-Ride system. This certi- fication shall be the basis for payment to Seniors by City of the $ . 33 mileage reimbursement. Such certification shall be signed by an officer of the Senior ' s organization . Gity. shall provide payment within ten ( 10) working days after receipt and approval of the certi- fication. Seniors shall provide the City , on a monthly basis , a report as to the actual operational costs requiring reimbursement by City. City shall limit its payment for such assistance to no more than $200 .00 per month. City shall provide payment within ten ( 10) working days after receipt and approval of request for payment. This agreement shall terminate as of June 30 , 1982. Requests for continuation of existing support or the consideration of addi- tional support beyond the termination date of this agreement shall be submitted in writing to the City by April 1 , 1982 , in order to be in- cluded in the succeeding Fiscal Year budget considerations. • 1 • CITY OF ATASCADERO MURRAY L . WARDEN, City Manager APPROVED AS TO F M: i ALLEN GRIMES , City Attorney SENIOR CITIZENS UNITED, INC . • By: edc4j 01,22J a �•� • i • M E M O R A N D U M TO: Murray Warden FROM: Larry McPherson SUBJECT: Bid #81-11 - Dump Truck Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council accept the low bid .for the subject item submitted' by Pete Johnston Chevrolet, P.O. Box 607, Paso Robles , CA, in the amount of $27,;908. 12 f Background ✓ The funds for this item are available in account #01-4402-312- Dump Truck Lease/Purchase. • The attached bid spread sheet shows the results of the bids received. WRENCE McPHERSON LM:vh 8-13-81 att. r o 00 t H (J F-' � H N N N (t (D F-' (D C N F- F,- �-3 (t P) x F-j- 137 H x td d d N . O p O (D w � 0 . C ro ro ro -U). bd F-' ft n (D p� (D N H Fj- �31 U) D rt J fJ W• h 1-0 Fj- O (D rt rt fth m �10 a �r n FJ. N X O �O ft (t o O mtzr Lij lw �J F- H (D O Ul N N N. C) % ti C1 In J (t J p N H �3' (D (n • O �.o N -1 N Ln (D ct O 00 -1 1,0 Ln G' (D n CC 0) N w -4 Fi (D fv C) O C4 t•1 • (DO mC) � w NO lD N C11 O P N rt, ::j W ti N (D O rt �l (!� F� O x rn (D > t ct to trJ 00 N }d O Ln W N l0 N Ln t--' J 10 V7 k.0 CD H J O O O A F-' otrJ t10 O O O O O OD OO OO G F-' N N H M W A�h N N ti Ul Nm W N iP 00 00 w Ln (n rt* Ul O O Ln O C.0 CoO OO O O O O O LTJ 1v �Q Fi G FJ' N• � W F' Ul > N W O H P O ct N O O FP P hs Di O O Gl Ul CL In J -I O o O O P) N (D 0 • M E M O R A N D U M TO: Murray Warden FROM: Larry McPherson SUBJECT: Bid #81-13 - Air Compressor Recommendation It is recommended that City Council accept the low bid for the subject item submitted by Mustang Equipment Company, 2425 Kella Avenue, Whittier, CA 90601, in the amount of $13,488. 88. _ Background: Funds for this purchase are available in account #01-4402-313 , Air Compressor with Tools. The attached bid spread sheet shows the results of the bids received. ix5� LAWRENCE McPHERSON LM•vh 8-20-81 att. � H tri W 0*1 q C/') O w C 10 �- r , OO (DD P. ((D h-• N Uri �. CD O- N is F_ rt un rt _ CD O a ro °ho (~D ((DD L CD OL O x wa "0 hF- � o Fi , F- LTi >c 4 F'• A) �.Q 00 (D (D c) r_; \ rt, n F- � �rcn Cro 00 O (D n o (D �o t (D o rt w d o H C4 Gl c.4 CD O 00 'O to C) N -s to d (D F ~ fi (n r h O Ln oCD _ rt \ \ \ tz7 rr ft ft (-- O 0 O n F- H (n fn _ N _ t� O c C/? DC7 C T1 c ZD rt N j b 1 V Fr. C) D F, F' O y W J In W r- p- N N OD I- t_. W -1I N Oto (7 CD q � 0 n W .1 Oo o - - "0 -1 lfl l0 W C,) COD Fi ulE _II O O � :•D W W E-' 'P d Fl- C) O O Ul CD rt O CDD OH In In In cn O N M E M O R A N D U M TO: Murray FROM: Larry McPherson SUBJECT: Street Sweeping Bid Recommendation: It is recommended that Council accept the bid by Harold Peterson, in the amount of $20 ,800 , to provide street sweeping along E1 Camino Real and the downtown area. The sweeping is to be accom- plished on a bi-weekly schedule. Background: This is the third attempt, through the bid process,., to establish a regular street sweeping schedule by contract. This office has modified the contract conditions and sweeping route to minimize the cost of this contract by proposing the lowest acceptable level of service. . During the past several months , City forces have operated a rented sweeper in order to determine the amount of time necessary to service the sweeper route. Considering sweeping time , hauling of debris to the dump, and equipment maintenance , it takes approximately 12 man hours to service the route. Mr. Peterson' s bid was based on approx- imately the same route times. In considering this bid, several alternatives were received. These alternatives are as follows : 1) Purchase new street sweeper: It is projected that the cost for this alternative would be $25 , 000 per year, including equipment acquisition costs , labor and maintenance. This analysis assumes a 10o interest rate on financing a lease.-purchase and a 6 year equipment life. 2) Purchase a rebuilt sweeper. The cost for this option is projected at $19 ,200 per year with 10o financing and a 4 year equipment life. 3) Sweep the entire area by hand. This proposal would require a full time person at a projected labor cost of $17 , 100 , per year. It would also be necessary to provide a dump bed pickup to haul the sweepings. Labor and equipment costs would total approximately $20 ,000 per year. It should be pointed out that since the sweeping needs to be done at night and early mornings , an employee on foot is would be exposed constantly to traffic during those times of low visibility. 4) Do not sweep on a regular basis , but encourage fronting owners to clean their own frontages. This is in essence what is • happening now. Many complaints are received, however, especially by bicyclists experiencing problems with 'broken glass and debris along the curb lines. Most often a property owner will simply hose off his frontage and wash the accumulation down the street causing a larger problem elsewhere. Areas that are undeveloped or where adequate off-street parking exist usually get no attention by the property owner, since they feel they have limited utilization of the street frontage. The recommendation to accept the bid from Mr. Peterson is also prompted by the fact that presently the lack of a City vehicle maintenance facility would make ownership of a street sweeper in- feasible. The equipment ,requires a great deal of routine_ maintenance and parts replacement and the lack of facilities or personnel to perform this work would mean excessive down time for the sweeper. The service level established by this contract, would be re- viewed during the year and appropriate recommendations for changes ' could be incorporated into future contracts. Should a higher level of service be necessary, then cost factors should again be reviewed to determine the most cost effective way to provide this service. Funds in the amount of $12 ,000 are in account number 01-4402- 224-004 , Contracted Services. It is proposed that the balance necessary for this contract be allocated from contingency reserves . • f` /,",�WRENCE McPHERSON Q' 8-18-81 i M E M O R A N D U M 0 �3 • TO: CITY MANAGER August 19 � 1981 g FROM: . PLANNING DIRECTOR RE : BOARD OF APPEALS I have completed a preliminary review of the request by the North County Contractors Association to change the membership of the Board of Appeals from Council members to building trades profes- sionals. The following comments are pertinent to that request . The ordinance adopted by City Council , in conjunction with other County ordinances , established a Board of Appeals consisting of the City Council to conduct hearings on alternate materials and types of construction and on reasonable interpretations of the uniform codes . The procedure for appeals is also outlined by or- dinance. (See Section 19 . 04. 120 and 19 .04 . 130 which are attached) This Board has been in existence since April , 1980 ,; when the City took over the building permit responsibilities , and has heard the only appeal filed to date ( i . e . exiting requirement's for McCarthy 's Restaurant) . In administering the uniform codes, differences of opinion in the interpretation of various regulations can occur on 'a regular basis . Sound administrative practices in reviewing disputed interpreta- tions can eliminate most appeals in a timely and effective manner . The Chief Building Inspector has frequently reviewed these matters with me to assure that decisions are fair and reasonable. As part of that informal process , there are frequent conferences on various interpretations with other City Staff ( i . e. Public 'Works , Fire) , with Building Officials from other cities in the County, with our contract plan checker (Elliott Stephenson) , with Staff engineers from I .C. B.O. (International Conference of Building Officials) , with recognized testing laboratories ( i . e. Underwriter ' s Labs) , with manufacturing representatives and similar recognized experts . Information from these sources is a major factor in the review of disputed interpretations . I doubt that the existence of this in- formal approach is recognized and yet it provides a speedy and fair review. One of the things that should be recognized is that Section 204 (copy attached) of the uniform codes limits the authority of a Board of Appeals as follows : ( 1 ) To determine the suitability of alternate materials and methods of construction; and , (2) To provide for reasonable interpretations of the technical • codes. It must be clearly understood that a Board of Appeals has no authority to waive clearly established regulations or to change administrative practices and procedures . The underlying purpose of the uniform M 0 codes is to benefit both builders and code administrators by mini- mizing the differences between various jurisdictions in an effort to reduce costs and simplify their use . Section 204 also indicates that a Board of Appeals should consist of "members who are qualified by experience and training to pass upon matters pertaining to building construction and building service equipment . " Common practice is either to appoint a board consisting of contractors , engineers , architects and usually a public member , or to establish City Council as the Board of Appeals. Since a city council is commonly the last appeal avenue for any local government matter", thelatter practice merely removes one additional step ( i . e. separate appeals board) from the process. It might also increase the value of City Staff training and experience in filling any technical gaps that council members might have. A brief survey of other cities in San Luis Obispo County concerning their Board of Appeals reveals the following: Grover City - Council appointed a five member of building trades professionals approximately two years ago but there have been no appeals to date San Luis Obispo - For many years there has been a five member Board (contractors , Cal Poly professors , 'etc . ) and there have been only infrequent -appeals . - Paso Robles - City Council has always served as the Board of Appeals and the only appeal in recent years concerned fire sprinkler requirements . Morro Bay - City Council has always served as the Board of Appeals and has not heard an appeal in seven years . Pismo Beach - City Council has always served as the Board of Appeals and has not heard an appeal in four years . Arroyo Grande No response. The experience of surrounding cities indicates that the use of appeals boards is infrequent and that the majority (3-2) of cities use the City Council for that purpose . It would also seem beneficial to consider some of the impacts of the Council-appointed appeals boards being requested. Those include administrative time and cost , time needed to process an appeal , economic interest disclosure requirements , and establishment of final decision-making authority. Administrative time and cost — Staff time will be required to review appeals , prepare written reports and notices , organize hearings , attend hearings , etc . These administrative responsibilities will not only incur direct costs , but will also reduce Staff time used for other duties . This would be an increase from the current appeals process since Council meetings are regularly scheduled and already staffed , although some factors ( i .e. notice , written reports) are needed irregardless of the composition of the Board . 0 0 Time needed to process an appeal - Lead time necessary to schedule an appeal before Council or an appointed Board would be similar . but , since the decision of an appointed Board would be subject to appeal , the entire process before a final decision can be reached is likely to be longer by several weeks . With the current process a Council decision is final . Economic interest disclosure requirements - Any appointed Board would have to comply with these requirements and file the annual reports even if the Board never met . Processing the forms takes some Staff time. In addition , some in the development business have a tendency to shy away from these disclosures . Of course , City Council is already required to file. Final decision-making authority - It is unlikely that Council can give up its ultimate responsibility to such a Board. As a result, the appointed Board can become another layer of bureaucracy which does not appear necessary if the frequency of appeals heard in other cities is indicative. Typically, appointed boards such as a Planning Commission are intended to relieve a Council of some detailed reviews where there is high volume of activity. It becomes obvious that there are situations where the appointed Board can be beneficial and where it can be detrimental . It is necessary for the City to examine its situation in considering this request . I am compelled to advance my concern that at least some support for this request is aimed at undermining the firm stance taken by the Planning Department in administering the uniform codes . I believe that our position is a responsible one and that it has resulted in even-handed administration of the uniform codes . There is no doubt that some are unhappy with this and would prefer to see it change . In the fifteen or so months since the City took over these respon- sibilities , both you and I have offered , on a number of occasions , both groups and individuals the opportunity to document any situation where more than Code minimums have been demanded. However , as you are aware , no one has done so. Perhaps , I take the pessimistic view un- fairly. I also do not feel that many fully understand the limits of authority of the Board of Appeals and will become frustrated by them - possibly leading to more , not less, problems . feel that many fully understand the limits of authority of the Board of Appeals and will become frustrated by them - possibly leading to more , not less , problems . If it is determined that an appointed Board of Appeals is needed , then it will be necessary to modify the existing Building and Construction Ordinance and to prepare rules and regulations for the conduct of the Board. This review would have to include consideration of such fac- tors as the number of members , qualifications of members , length of terms , method of calling a meeting , notice requirements , procedures for appeal , appeals fees to offset increased costs , etc . It may be difficult to find members of the board who are not burdened by poten- tial benefit from its decisions . In any event , the matter should be referred back to Staff to prepare the needed ordinance changes and procedures if this alternative is selected . 0 0 If it is determined that the City Council should remain as the Board of Appeal , then no further action is needed . • RECOMMENDATION The Planning Director recommends that the Board of Appeals not be changed for the following reasons: 1 . At this time , the existing appeals procedure is virtually untried . 2. The very- low frequency of appeals in this City and surrounding cities is indicative of limited need for another level of decision-making. 3 . The current informal process , which solves most problems at the lowest level of decision-making in the most expedient man- ner , would be less effective because many more might opt for a direct appeal to the Board rather than attempting to work out every problem on an informal basis . 4 . Use of City Council as the Board of Appeals would result in the least delay for appellants and the most efficient use of Staff resources and City funds. LAWRENCE STEVENS MRAY WARDEN Planning Director C ' ty Ma ager /ps �� PHONE 466-9545 e ��Sfi �FFI�E B©X '172 39 NORTH COUNTY CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION E AfiASGA©EROS C1ALiF X3422 E � t y z E .sa August 7, 1981 {i V 1 .y W iaf • .4J U A F, Mr . Murray Warden City of Atascadero 6500 Palma Avenue Atascadero , California 93422 Dear Mr. Warden: This is to formally request that the North County Contractors Association be put on the agenda for the City Council meeting August 24, 1981 , for the purpose of presenting to the council a proposal for the adoption of an Appeals Board pursuant to the Uniform Building Code. Please acknowledge as soon as possible. Thank you. Sincerely Robert Sonne President RHS : dt e � x x F r PN6N5 466 45,,x s POST UFP10E SOX 't72 NORTH COUNTY CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION AIASCADER01,CAM 3422 o s g .r rc. e _e G � as August 18 , 1981 +s a. Mr. Murray Warden City of Atascadero 6500 Palma Avenue Atascadero, California 93422 RE: Board of Appeals Dear Mr. Warden: The North County Contractors Association is requesting to form B i f 1 a Board of Appeals as provided for in Section 204 o the 979 Edition of the Uniform Building; Code. i The enclosed proposed by-laws appear to be the generally accepted by-laws for Board of Appeals . These by-laws are, for the most part, those that have been established by the City of San Luis A Obispo. It has been the experience of the City of San Luis Obispo that the appeal process has been utilized very few times in the past several years . However, those who have served on the Board of Appeals have stated that they have found it an exceptionally useful devise to solve discrepancies and that all parties , including both inspectors and contractors , have found the Board of Appeals to be auseful body. The North County Contractors Association thanks you for your attention given to this matter and are willing to be of any and all assistance in the creation of this Board of Appeals .. Since.r-ej- , j �e- "ert Sonne PRESIDENT RS : dt Enc. t F • BYLAWS OF THEI' I;IITLDTNC CONSTRUCTTON BOARD OF APPI?ALS OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO ARTICLE I PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES • 1 . 1 The purpose and objectives of the Building Construction Board of Appeals of the City of Atascadero are as follows : (a) To comply with Section 204 of the 1979 Uniform Building Code , or as amended; (b) To Provide a mems whereby d i shutes concern i nye interpretation of the Uniform Building Code between building officials of Atascadero , building, contractors , and other builders can be settled . ARTICLE II 1IEEI'TNGS 2 . 1 Notice of Meetings : Meetings shall be held on • the call of the Chairmen or when requested by the Chief Building official on at least three days public notice , given in a form acceptable to the City Clerk. The applicant or appellant shall - 1 - receive written notice of the time , date , and place of the meeting by first class mail postage pre-paid , at least five (5) days prior to the meeting . All meetings shall be open to the public . 2 . 2 Place of Meetings : Meetings shall be held in the City Administration Building located at 6500 Palma Avenue , Atascadero , California, in a room to be so desig- nated by the Board. 2 . 3 Other Meeting Places : Tn the event the Board cle;; i 1-e:; t c;--h�I I cl rI I 1 OI :illy prom i (III c,( a nl('el i 11)" ;if a p 1 :Icc ()I II( I I 11.111 I hI C i l y A(I111 i II i :;i I .I I i OII I1,1I i I d i 11)" , t IIS II Lhe p1'Ice of srac•h Mt eeillj" ;;11.11 1 hE llo:;t eel (III 111(' hI111 et ill board located at Lhe enLr_ance to the City Administrative Offices , or such other suitable place , prior to the time herein designated for such meeting. ARTICLE III MEMBERSHIP 3 . 1. Board Composition : The Board of Appeals shall consist o_r__�i_x mem Icl r.s of wham five shall be vot.i.nj" members , ;and- clic. a rlorl-vot..iiig member . I.'clur Irlellll>ers of Lhe , Board shall have experi.erlce and be knowledgeable :hi Lhe Building Code and be licensed as a general contractor, specialty contractor, structural engineer or architect . The fifth member of the Board shall be a lay member of the public . The Chief Building Official shall be the sixth member of the Board , and shall be non-voting , serving as Secretary to the Board. ` � 3 . 2 Term of Members�hiP: Members of the Board of Appeals shall be appointed by the Atascadero City Council to serve for the following terms : Three members shall be appointed to serve for three year terms , and two members including the lay member from the public shall be appointed t.o serve fm- lwc> year ternls; . ARTJC1,F; 1.V OFFICERS & DUTIES /I . 1 Off i.ceI <; : Offic ('r:; of the 1�o.Ir(l of Appeals shall c011sl-tit of .a Cha l.r'man , .I Valle-Ch;i i i-m ll , all(I .I Secret - ary . The Chairman shall be elected by a majority of the entire regular membership at the first meeting of each calander year , to serve for a term of one calander year . A • • Vice-Chairman shall be elected in the same manner at the same time for a term of one calander year. The Chief Building Official shall be an ex-officio member of the Board and shall be Secretary to the Board. 4 . 2 Duties of the Chairman : The Chairman of the Board of Appeals shall presice at all meetings , shall conduct all hearings , and exercise and perform such other powers and duties as may be from time to time assigned to him by the Board of Appeals or prescribed by the bylaws . In presiding at meetings and hearings , the Chairman shall rule on pro�ceedure and on order of presentation , vote on all quesLi.ons , and annot.ir)ce the Igor rd of Appeal ' s decisions . 4 . 3 Duties of Vice-Chairman : In Lhe absence of the disability of the Chairman , tTic Vice-Chairman shall perform all the duties of the Chair--n -incl whon so nct_i_ng shall have all the powers of , and I restrictions upon, the Chairman. 4 . 4 Duties of the Secre Chairman and Vice-Chairman are abs call the meeting to order and the 1 its members , other than the Secret; pro tempora . • 4 . 4 . 1 Minutes & Records : �1 keep , or cause to be kept , minutes '' " of the Board of Appeals and shall each meeting which. shall be furnisl prior to the actual hour of the me, (`` shall also be custodian of the rect Appeals and shall , upon the filing to the Board , furnish each member claim or letter of appeal . i . I Coltf lic t' oC C[Itrcs Itave knowlccl�_,c cif ariy fct wl�icli i M.cL OF i_nt.cre:;t in Ili :; considcjra shall forthwith notify the Bu_ildin, 5 . 2Quorum: A majority shall constitute a quorum for the but a lesser number may adjourn fr postpone the consideration of plea absence ofany member of the Board , majority vote , adjourn the meeting ration of pending business . • -3- 5 . 3 Agenda : In order for items and materials to be included on an agenda or to be acted upon by the Board of Appeals , they must be submitted to the Secretary of the Board at least seven (7) days prior to the date on which said re- quest will be considered by the Board . Such request must be made in writing setting forth the following : 1 . The address and location of the property 2. The owner of the property' 3 . The address of the owner of the property, and the telephone. number 4 . Tile factors Off Llle appeal i.ncludi_ng where ,lppl,i_cablc (a ) code prov i r;ioll (b) tlaLure of Clio requested cliange (c) reason for the change (d) all other factors or reasons for appeal 5 . 4 Conduct- of sha1.1. conduct- ;.Of nlec t i ngs i n ll m;lllncr as to allow the appellant , claimant , or his agent to be heard as well as any other interested parties . The appellant , claimant , • or other interested party shall be permitted to present such supporting evidence as is necessary for his case , in as reasonable time as possible . 5 . 5 Concluding Hearing : When all evidence has been presented and all testimony taken , the Chairman shall close the hearing to further testimony and the matter shall be given to the Board for discussion and resolution. The Chairman may reopen the hearing , for the taking of further_ evidence , or clarification of evidence with the concurrence of the Board, providing no one involved in the proceedings has left the room. 5 . 6 Findings : Upon thc' conclusion of the talcinf� of (-vi_cicnc•c , ;lnd the disciissiorl l)y the 1w;11-d of f.hc nlcr i I :: Of t hw ;�l�pca 1 , ;incl ;i 1 1 othcl' re lev;int cv i (l- encc , the Ch;I i i-man r;h,i I I , l)c, l I c .-wll vc,l ill}" 11wililwi- and aluzot1nce what 1wl- I he appca I i .; dcil i ed , I he appca l it; granted, and upc,n wilier, collditi_ons , it any , the appeal is granted. A formal declaration of the findings shall be submitted ill writing , si-gned by the Chairman , to the City Council , and to the appellarnt , within ten ( 10) days of the hearing . • -4- 5 . 7 nl'ivr.21 fhe ,Ippellj411t- ]Iris t:hc Fight- to pperil all decisions o[ Hie 11,oa1-ol of n}���cr1l.;a t.o the City Council. . ARTICLE IV MISCELLANEOUS 6 . 1 Amendment of Bylaws : These Bylaws may be amend- ed by a vote of�r o�the regular members of the Board of Appeals . 6 . 2 New Legi s l a ti_or1 : Nothing in these Bylaws sh;111 prohibit the Dori i-( of Appe;i Is t i-on) rc�conunenol i_n} ncw l c�;i_s Ori tion as may be necessary to the City Council . • -5- • ROBERT J.WILKINS,JR. - MAYOR WILLIAM H.STOVER MAYOR PRO-TEMPORE GEORGE P. HIGHLAND aseade t's • MAORAE B. MACKEY - INCORPORATED JULY 2, 1979 R MURRAY L.WARDEN ADMINISTRATION BUILDING < - - - - CITY MANAGER/CLERK POST OFFICE BOX 747 ATASCADERO,CALIFORNIA 93422 FIRE DEPARTMENT PHONE (805) 466-8000 6005 LEWIS AVENUE ATASCADERO,CA 93422 (805) 466.2141 REPORT FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY For the Council Meeting of August 24, 1981 No. 15 1. REPORT OF THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES LEGAL ADVOCACY COMMITTEE • The report of the Legal Advocacy Committee of July 30, 1981 indicated that the Committee had reviewed some 40 cases of significance to cities now pending in the state and federal courts. The Committee recommended amicus participa- tion by consenting cities in the following two cases: a. Citizens Against Forced Annexation v. LAFCO This case represents a constitutional equal protection challenge to the provisions of MORGA, which generally restrict the vote on a proposed inhabited annexation to the voters of the territory to be annexed. An election in the annexing city is required only if the proposed annexa- tion would increase either the voting population or the assessed value of the land in the annexing city by 50 percent or more. The appellate court rejected the challenge, concluding that the general provision requiring a vote only in the territory to be annexed is consistent with the terms of the Fourteenth Amendment. Plaintiffs, however, have sought . and been granted a hearing by the State Supreme Court. The Los Angeles City Attorney's office will be filing an amicus curiae brief in support of LAFCO before the Supreme Court. The significance of the case to all cities is apparent since it suggests the potential of a court-imposed constitutional requirement that all annexations be subjected to a vote of the electorate of the annexing city. b. San Diego Union, etc. v. City Council of the City of San Diego This case presents the issue of whether the individual salaries of non- • elected city executives or department heads may be discussed and decided REPORT FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY No. 15 - Page 2 • upon in an executive or closed session of the City Council under the Brown Act. Such a salarysettingprocedure for the 1980-81 fiscal year was used by the San Diego City Council with respect to four department heads whose performance, according to the trial court's findings of fact, were not in question, the "City Council being satisfied that each was performing satisfactorily." The trial court concluded that the Brown Act does not permit a City Council "to meet in executive session to discuss and/or determine the salaries of nonelected city executives." The City has filed an appeal in the matter and an amicus is being pre- pared. Since the case is one of first impression and presents an issue of significance to all cities, the Committee and the League Board have taken action recommending amicus participation by consenting cities in support of the City. c. City of Livermore v P.G.&E. Co. The League advises us that on June 26, 1981, the Court of Appeal filed its opinion in the Livermore case (120 Cal.App.3d 1001) ,.•reversing the trial court and upholding the City's business license tax as applied to the utility. The case is precedent setting in that it involves a con- _ struction of Article XIII, Section 19, of the Constitution insofar as it provides that no tax or license charge may be imposed on public utilities which differs from that imposed on "mercantile, manufacturing, and other business corporations." A petition for hearing has been filed by P.G.&E. • The case is of prime importance to virtually all cities, because an ad- verse decision by the Supreme Court could substantially alter the busi- ness license tax revenues derived from public utilities under existing ordinances. There is every expectation that an amicus brief will be filed in support of the City in the event a hearing is granted. All city attorneys are urged to consider joining as amici in support of Livermore before the Supreme Court. If the City Council expresses no objection, I will proceed to lend the name of the City of Atascadero in support of the amicus •curiae briefs, without cost to the City. Other cases of interest called to our attention are: C. Zuzow v. City of Monrovia, et al. This is an action pending in the trial court by an Arcadia firefighter who was disciplined following his arrest in Monrovia for disturbing the peace, threats made to the Monrovia Police Department during the booking process, and the report of such by the Monrovia Chief of Police to the Arcadia Fire Chief. In his action against the City of Monrovia and the police officers involved, plaintiff alleges a violation of his constitutional right to privacy, interference with his employment rela- tions, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. There are no allegations that the arrest was improper or that the discipline was unjustified. The trial court overruled the defendant city's demurrer • • 0 REPORT FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY • No. 15 - Page 3 to the causes of action for violation of the right to privacy and inter- ference with employment relations, and sustained the demurrer, with 30 days leave to amend, as to the cause of action for intentional infliction. The City intends to answer and move for summary judgment, basing the motion on the mutual aid agreement between the cities and the need for full cooperation. d. Grove v. Goodman This case from the City of Clovis involves the authority of the manager under the City's personnel ordinance, which was patterned after a League- suggested ordinance distributed in the 19501s, to terminate an employee after receiving the recommendation of the Personnel Commission. In other words, the manager was given the final right to terminate an employee. e. Bamboo Brothers v. Carpenter, et al. This is a case involving the validity of the County's paraphernalia ordinance. The trial court ruled that it was invalid because it violated the First Amendment, as well as the fact that it was preempted by State legislation. This case is now on appeal. - - f. DiVita v. City of Montebello, et al. This case is now pending on appeal following a trial court's confirmance of the action of the City Council in upholding the discharge of a city police officer arising out of acts of insubordination related to his violation of departmental rules relative to moonlighting activities. g. Community Communications Co. , Inc. v. City of Boulder, Colorado, et al. This widely publicized case has recently been taken over by the U.S. Supreme Court. It is expected that the Court will delimit the antitrust liability exposure of cities in the franchise, permit, and licensing processes. Both NIMLO and the National League of Cities will be sub- mitting amicus curiae briefs in the U.S. Supreme Court. 2. RECENT DECISIONS OF INTEREST a. Beer License OK Despite Loud Music and Slow Police The C.A.3d has held that a finding of the B.A.B.C. that "disturbances sometimes would occur" if a particular establishment were licensed to serve alcoholic beverages did not constitute good cause for denial of the license. (Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board, C.A.3d, June 30, 1981.) b. Condominium Tax Law Declared Valid The California Supreme Court has upheld the Santa Monica condominium tax law and declared that it is not preempted by the Subdivision Map Act. . The City of Santa Monica imposed a tax of $1,000 on each new condominium or condominium conversion unit before the issuance of a condominium license. (The Pines v. Santa Monica, Sup.Ct. , July 16, 1981.) • REPORT FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY No. 15 - Page 4 • c. Temporary Employee Rights The C.A.4th has held that a temporary county employee who had been on his job for six years was entitled to a fair procedure on any termination of his employment, including showing of good cause for termination upon proper notice and hearing. (Cresap v. County of San Diego, C.A.4th, July 14, 1981.) d. Cost of Transcript The C.A.2d has held that the prevailing respondent is entitled to the cost of preparation of one copy of any type of record on appeal authorized by the California Rules of Court. The Santa Barbara County Firefighters sued the County for injunction, mandate, damages, and other relief arising from their labor negotiations. Judgment was entered for the County, the firefighters appealed, and the judgment was affirmed. The C.A.2d held that the County was entitled to the cost of the transcript under a 1968 amendment to the Rules of Court which specifically entitled the prevailing respondent to the cost of one copy, of any record authorized on appeal. (Santa Barbara County Firefighters v. County of Santa Barbara, C.A.2d, July 13, 1981.) - e. Brown Act The C.A.lst has held that a Board of Education violates the Brown Act when it meets in closed session with prospective contractors to discuss • their qualifications to dispose of surplus real property owned by the Board. The court held that the Brown Act referred not only to discus- sions, but also to the fact-finding process prior to ultimate decision. The interviewees were not exempted because they contended they were independent contractors rather than employees. (Bowen v. Santa Clara Unified School District, C.A.lst, July 1, 1981.) f. Ordinance Prohibiting Outdoor Signs As the end of a long legal hassle, the U.S. Supreme Court has held that a San Diego city ordinance prohibiting outdoor billboards conveying non- commercial as well as commercial messages was unconstitutional on its face. The implication of the opinion is that an ordinance prohibiting signs conveying commercial messages alone is valid. The decision is a disappointment to those who have attempted for years to have judicial approval of ordinances prohibiting all billboards. (Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San Diego, U.S. Sup.Ct. , July 2,1981.) g. Discharge of Public Employees Without Cause The C.A.3d has held that public employees serving at the pleasure of the appointing power may be terminated without cause, notice, or a hearing so long as the reason for the removal does not impinge upon the exercise of a constitutional right. The employees in this case were not civil servants and did not have an interest in continuing employment. They held their jobs subject to the City's rules and regulations and had no • REPORT FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY No. 15 - Page 5 • right to notice or hearing prior to employment termination. The City also withdrew its recognition of the union over which this battle arose, because the union violated the resolutions which it had agreed to obey and which called for withdrawal of recognition as a penalty for disobe- dience. (International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union 1245 v. City of Gridley, C.A.3d, June 30, 1981.) h. Use of MailBoxes Upheld The U.S. Supreme Court has upheld the constitutionality of Title 18, Section 1725, which prohibits depositing unstamped, mailable matter in letter boxes approved by the U.S. Postal Service. (U.S. Postal Service v. Council of Greenburgh Civic Association, U.S. Sup.Ct. , June 25, 1981.) i. Municipality Held Not Liable for Punitive Damages The U.S. Supreme Court has held that municipalities are not subject to punitive damages under the U.S. Civil Rights Act. (City,of Newport v. Fact Concerts, Inc. , U.S. Sup.Ct. ,. June 26, 1981.) j. Non-Union Employees Have Obligation to Union-Attorneys - In a landmark decision, the C.A.2d has held that non-union members of a bargaining unit were equitably but not contractually bound to pay their . share of a contingency fee to attorneys retained by the union. The impact of the case is that the court recognizes that while public em- ployees may refuse to join or participate in the activities of employee organizations (and thus there could be no contractual liability to the union) , such employees nevertheless could be required to contribute to the litigation costs under the equitable "common fund" rule that a pas- sive beneficiary of a common fund may be required to contribute to defray the costs of securing the fund. The implications of this opinion are extensive and it is referred to in the League Advocacy Report, supra. k. State May Ban Nudity The U.S. Supreme Court has upheld the state law prohibiting nude dancing in establishments licensed to sell liquor for on-premises consumption. (New York State Liquor Authority v. Bellanca, U.S. Sup.Ct. , June 22, 1981.) 1. Off-Highway Vehicle Ordinance An ordinance prohibiting the driving of a motor vehicle over another's land without the owner's permission was held valid as not being in con- flict with Penal Code section 602(m) . (Sports Committee Dist. 37 A.M.A. , Inc. v. County of San Bernardino, 113 Cal.App.3d 155, December 11, 1980.) m. Automatic Resignation Provision Government Code section 19503 providing for automatic resignation based • on absence without leave for five consecutive working days is valid. (Willson v. State Personnel Board, 113 Cal.App.3d 312, December 15, 1980.) REPORT FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY No. 15 - Page 6 n. Retroactive Compensation Under California Constitution, Article IV, Section 17, providing that the Legislature has no power to grant extra compensation to public employees after service has been rendered, when employees' salary levels are not fixed with certainty while the employees are working, the compensation they ultimately receive for their work cannot accurately be deemed "extra compensation," and whether or not collective bargaining is involved, the extra compensation clause is not offended when state employees receive retroactive salary adjustments for periods during which they worked with justifiable uncertainty regarding their salary levels. Further, the Legislative enactment awarding a lump sum payment based on work already performed was not invalid as a gift of public funds. (Jarvis v. Cory, 28 Cal.3d 562, December 18, 1980.) o. Zoning Subject to Initiative Zoning is a legislative act -subject to initiative irrespective of the size of the parcel affected. (Arnel Development Co. v. City of Costa Mesa, 28 Cal.3d 511, December 18, 1980.) 3. PENDING LITIGATION a. City of Atascadero v. Daly, et al. No change. • b. Sn w, Atascadero Firefighters Association v. City of Atascadero, et al. No hange. Respectfull submitted, ALLEN GRIMES City Attorney AG:fr • RESOLUTION NO. 25-81 4 RESOLUTION ADOPTING MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING • WITH THE ATASCADERO POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION __ 4 WHEREAS, the Atascadero City Council, pursuant to Government Code Section 3500 et seq, enacted an Employer-Employee Relations policy with its adoption of Ordinance No. 24 , dated July 14, 1980, and of Resolution No. 12-80 on July 14 , 1980; and WHEREAS, under the terms of that policy, the City Manager and/or his representatives and the individual employee associa- tion members have met and consulted in good faith; and WHEREAS, these parties have reached agreement on matters relating to employment conditions of the said individual Police Officers Association member as reflected by the written Memorandum of Understanding signed by them on the day; of , 1981, which Memorandum is attached hereto and made a part hereof; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the provisions and agree- ments contained in said Memorandum of Understanding are fair and proper and are in the best interests of the City. _ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Atascadero that the terms and conditions', contained in said Memorandum of Understanding are hereby adopted. • On motion by Councilman and seconded by Councilman , the Atascadero City Council hereby adopts the fore- going resolution in its entirety on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ADOPTED: ROBERT J. WILKINS, JR. , Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FO' . MURRAY L. WARDEN, City Clerk ALLEN GRIMES, City Attorney • MEMORADUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWE, N THE ITY OF ATASCADERO AND TH ATAS DERO POLICE OFFICERS ASSO TION This Memorandum of Understanding is made and entered into be- tween e tween the Employee Relations Officer of the City of Atascadero , here- inafter ,. referred to as "City" , and the Atascadero Police Officers Association , hereinafter referred to as "Association" , pursuant to California Government Code Sections 3500 et seq. ; City of Atascadero Ordinance No. 24 , dated July 14 , 1980 ; and City of Atascadero Resolu- tion No. 12-80 , dated July 14 , 1980 . The parties have met and consulted in good faith regarding employ- ment terms and conditions for members of the police officers ' bar- gaining unit as recognized by the City of Atascadero on April 27 , 1981 , and having reached agreement as hereinafter sset forth , shall submit this Memorandum to the City Council with the joint recommenda- tion that that body resolve to adopt its terms and conditions and take such other or additional action as may be necessary to implement its provisions . Section 1 . Purpose. It is the purpose of this Memorandum of Understanding , hereinafter referred to as "MOU" , to promote and pro- vide for continuity of operation in employment through harmonious re- lations , cooperation and understanding between Management and the employees covered by the provisions of this Agreement and to set forth - the understanding reached between the parties as a result of good faith negotiations on the matters set forth herein. Section 2 . Pay. Salary ranges for all classes of employees • covered by the MOU shall reflect an 8 .5% increase over the salary scale adopted and effective, January 1 , 1981 , all as specifically set forth herein by reference . Such increase shall be effective as of July 1 , 1981 . Section 3 . Health Insurance. Effective with the first pre- mium due on or after July 1 , 1981 , City agrees to pay up to , but not more than , Thirty Dollars ($30 . 00) per month, per employee , toward the monthly medical and dental insurance premium for all eligible employee spouses , children or dependents as defined by the insurance agreement. For those employees without dependents or who do not choose to enroll their dependents in the City plan , then said $30 . 00 per month, per premium cost , shall be paid to the employee as an addition to his regular salary. Section 4 . Holidays . City agrees that Association members shall receive one ( 1 ) additional holiday beyond that provided for by City Resolution No . 12-80 dated July 14 , 1980 , to be known as a "floating holiday" . Said floating holiday shall be one ( 1 ) day per year based upon the employee ' s birthday. Employee may take such holi- day at his choice , of time consistent with the scheduling needs of the City and subject to approval of the Department Head. Section 5 . Term Life Insurance . City shall apply for a term life insurance policy for each employee in a total amount of Fifteen • Thousand Dollars ($15 , 000 . 00) and shall pay all premiums for such policy during the term of this agreement, 1 RESOLUTION NO. 25-81 RESOLUTION ADOPTING MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE LTASCADERO POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION WHEREAS, the jItascadero City Council, pursuant to Government Code Section 3506 Est seq, enacted an Employer-Employee Relations policy with its adaption of Ordinance No. 24 , dated July 14, 1980, and of Resolution 4o. 12-80 on July 14 , 1980; and WHEREAS, uncje;' the terms of that policy, the City Manager and/or his repre:;eiitatives and the individual employee associa- tion members havFSllet and consulted in good faith; and WHEREAS, thf,se parties have reached agreement on matters relating to employment conditions of the said individual Police Officers Association member as reflected by the written Memorandum of Understandin<j sidned by them on the day of 1981, which Mem,aranaum is attached hereto and made a part hereof; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the provisions and agree- ments containf3d in said Memorandum of Understanding are fair and proper and arE2! in the best interests of the City. _ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Atasc:adero t?at the terms and conditions contained in said Memorandum o't UnderstAnding are hereby adopted. On motion by Cour'cilman and seconded by Councilman , the Atascadero City Council hereby adopts the fore- going resolution in it:'• entirety on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ADOPTED: ROBERT J. WILKINS, JR. , Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: • Nl'JRRAY L. WARDEN, City Clerk ALLEN GRIMES, City Attorney Section 6 . Work Amthedules . The shift hours r police officers shall be eight 8 h s exclusive of one-half (VF) hour lunch when work load permits . Briefing time shall be included in the shift sche- dule . • Section 7 . Overtime. Overtime for police officers on forty (40 ) hour work week schedules is authorized for time worked in excess of forty (40 ) hours in a work week schedule consisting of seven (7) consecutive days . Such overtime provisions shall exclude shift changes and transfers. Overtime pay shall be calculated at the rate of one and one-half ( 1 1 /2) times the hourly base rate of pay. All overtime work which is less than a one ( 1 ) hour increment in a work shift shall be compensated for in the following manner : 1 to 15 minutes , overtime compensation 0 16 to 30 minutes , overtime compensation 1/2 hour 31 to 45 minutes , overtime compensation 3/4 hour 46 to 60 minutes , overtime compensation 1 hour Any overtimeincrements worked over one ( 1 ) hour shall be com- pensated as in the above-referenced increments . Compensatory time in lieu of overtime shall be computed at a time and one-half ate of the base salary and shall be granted to employees at the mutual con- venience of the Police Department and the employee and subject to the accumulation provisions as specified by City Resoluti n No. 12-80 dated July 14 , 1980 , Personnel Rules and Regulations. Section 8 . Term and Effect of Agreement . (a) This MOU shall be effective July 1 , 1981 , and shall remain in effect to and including June 30 , 1982. • (b) During the time of this MOU , the provisions hereof shall govern the wages , h"burs , benefits , and working conditions of employees Iwithin the Association as covered by the MOU . Neither party hereto shall be required to meet and consult upon matters set forth in this MOU , exzcept 'that the parties may meet and consult during the term of this MOU on any matter within the scope of representation where ( 1 ) the matter is not covered by the MOU or was not expressly raised as an issue during the meeting and consulting process by which this MOU resulted; and (2) there has arisen a signifi- cant change in circumstances with respect to such matter , which could not have reasonably been anticipated by both parties at the time they signed this MOU . (c) Nothing in Paragraph (b) of this section, however , shall relieve City of its obligations to meet and confer under con- ditions as required by the provisions of the MeyerMilias Brown Act. (d) The parties agree that meet and consult sessions pertaining to a successor Memorandum of Understanding shall be commenced as soon as possible after the request of either party made on or after February 1 , 1982. 2 Section 9 . Appliiabili-ty of Personnel RuIAM and Regulations . It is agreed and Wnderstood that in all dWer respects except as specifically enumerated by the MOU , the rules and regulations of the City of Atascadero as established by Ordinance No. 24 dated July 14 , 1980 , and Resolution No. 12-80-:dated -July 14 , 1980 , shall remain in full force and effect. • Dated : CITY OF ATASCADERO MURRAY L. WARDEN Employee Relations Officer APPROVED AS TO FORM: ALLEN GRIMES , City Attorney ATASCADERO POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION _ By • JOHN BARLOW By WILLIAM SWIFT By RICHARD BLUMBERG • 3 *-E_M_0_R_A_N_D_U_M_ TO: City Council • FROM: City Manager SUBJECT: Change in Classification Plan It has been recommended by the Public Works Director that we make changes to the Classification Plan as follows : 1 . Create a Maintenance Worker IV position which, in effect , is a leadman or foreman and that will be what the job descrip- tion for that position will reflect. Over the past - year , experience has shown that the field foreman (Maintenance Worker IV) position has evolved naturally in order to achieve field supervision of the work force . If you approve this change, it is our intention to promote Dan Elisarraras to this position . 2. We want to change the present Building Maintenance Worker title to Building Maintenance Worker I , 'same pay range as existing and create a Building Maintenance Worker II position which would reflect a higher degree of skill and job know- ledge requirements than we visualized in the original build- ing worker job requirement . Since we have experienced last • year ' s work around the Administration Building as well as around the Pavilion , it is obvious that we are demanding higher skills and job performance from that classification than we had originally thought necessary. If you approve the classification of a Building Maintenance Worker II position , it is our intention to move Chris Lane into that position resulting in a pay raise for him. His job performance of the last year certainly merits that consideration. 3 . An additional recommendation is for moving Loren Croson from Maintenance Worker I to a Maintenance Worker II . Again , as a consequence of experience in the last year , additional duties in heavy equipment operation have been required of Mr .Croson to insure job accomplishment . These increased responsibili- ties were not originally anticipated. Therefore , a promotion reflects the reality of the work force . Since none of these three changes were anticipated at budget time , it will be necessary to transfer monies from reserve. It would be appropriate, therefore, if you concur in these recommendations, to approve them by motion and to approve the transfer of $3 ,791 from re- serve to the appropriate Public Works accounts. It is my strong rec- ommendation that you adopt these changes to the Classification Plan and promotion of the individuals to these positions. • MU AY WARDEN W: ad 8-20-81 RESOLUTION NO.81-268 DZ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA MARIA REQUESTING THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES TO SPONSOR LEGISLATION WHICH WOULD PROVIDE LOCAL GOVERNMENTS WITH THE ABILITY TO EXERCISE MORE CONTROL OF BUSINESS ESTABLISHMENTS THAT SELL ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES. WHEREAS, the consumption of alcoholic beverages contributes significantly to crime problems in the community; and WHEREAS, local standards and needs regarding the sales of alcoholic beverages and the control of premises are often not considered; and WHEREAS, local government's principle means of controlling where alcoholic beverages will be sold is through zoning ordinances; and - ---== - "- WHEREAS, zoning ordinances may not be anadequate or appropriate manner to control where alcoholic beverages will be sold; and WHEREAS, local government is charged with keeping order in the community and that in some instances the location or the conduct of a business selling alcoholic beverages may be contrary to that charge; and WHEREAS, existing law does not provide local government with sufficient authority to control the proliferation of licensees or to exercise control over licensed premises which are long term sources of criminal activity; and WHEREAS, the 100 foot rule as outlined in rule 61.4 of the State of California V Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control prior to its amended form is an example of the legislation needed to assist local government on matters relating to where alcoholic beverages may be sold; and WHEREAS, a more profound application of contemporary community standards doctrine needs to be applied to alcoholic beverage licensing and license control; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santa Maria that the League of California Cities is urged to support legislation which would expand the control of local government on matters dealing with alcoholic beverage licensing- and license control. • ADOPTED thisl6th day of June, 1981.- /s/ GEORGE S. HOSES, JR. ATTEST: Mayor /s/ DOROTHY LYAL)dN AXPPOVED AS FORM: CONTENTS; •.�+s.:. _. City Clerk $Y; --- - 6Y 1'_�•� � 0 0 AGENDA - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting August 10 , 1981 7 : 30 p.m. Atascadero Administration Building Call to Order Pledge of Allegiance Invocation Roll Call Public Comment A. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Item A, Consent Calendar , are con- sidered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion in the form listed below. There will be no separate discussion of these items. If discussion is required , that item will be removed from the Consent Calendar and will be considered separately. Vote may be by roll call. 1 . Minutes of the special meeting of July 27 , 1981 (RECOMMEND APPROVAL) 2. Minutes of the regular meeting of July 27 , 1981 (RECOMMEND • APPROVAL) 3. Treasurer ' s Report , 7-1-81 to 7-31-81 (RECOMMEND APPROVAL) 4 . Acceptance of Parcel Map AT 80-95 , 10755 Vista Road, Glen Lewis (Stewart) (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) 5 . Acceptance of Parcel Map AT 810327 : 1 , 9600 , 9630 Carmelita , Edward Anderson (Twin Cities Engineering) (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) 6. Acceptance of Parcel Map AT 810107: 1 , 9100 E1 Camino Real, Donald Messer (Hilliard) (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COM- MISSION RECOMMENDATION) 7 . Tentative Parcel Map AT 810420 : 1 , Santa Lucia , Cencerro, and San Lucas Roads, Tenneco West (Twin Cities Engineering ) to realign portions of Santa Lucia and Cencerro ' roads and to adjust certain lot lines resulting from said road alignment (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) 8. Tentative Tract Map AT 810225 : 1, 6600 and 6650 Alcantara, - Dennis Moresco (Contract Survey & Design) to allow conversion of an existing triplex apartment into three air-space condo- miniums and creation of an additional eight new units as air- space condominiums with the two existing lots combined into one (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDA- TION) 9. Departmental Review R810714 : 1 , Variance V810516 : 1 , 6600 & 6650 Alcantara, Dennis Moresco (Contract Survey & Design) to • allow construction of eight two bedroom units and to reduce the required 25 ' front yard (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) 0 B. HEARINGS, APPEARANCES AND- REPORTS • 1 . Public Hearing on Road Abandonment A801210: 1 , 21450-2500 E1 Camino Real , James Gaskell and James Wentzel , to abandon Madera Place between Freeway 101 and E1 Camino Real 2. Report by City Manager on Atascadero Police Officers Associa- tion Memorandum of Unde •.tanding C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None D. NEW BUSINESS 1 . Consideration of San Luis Obispo County/Cities Basic Plan for Peacetime Emergencies 2. Resolution No. 23-81 approving application for 1980 State Grant monies for the Alvord Field improvement project E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION 1 . City Council 2. City Attorney 3. City Manager NOTE: The City Council will hold a closed session after the regular meeting to discuss employee negotiations. • • f MINUTES - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL Special Meeting • July 27 , 1981 7 : 00 p.m. Atascadero Administration Building The meeting was called to order at 7 : 00 p.m. by Mayor Wilkins. PRESENT: Councilmen Highland, Mackey, Nelson, Stover and Mayor Wilkins ABSENT• None It was noted that the meeting was called for the purpose of interviewing applicants for Planning Commissioner. Council members interviewed Henry Hohenstein, Wayne LaPrade, Ray Marasse, Gary Ruggerone, and W. H. Tilley. The meeting adjourned at 7 : 30 p.m. Recorded by: MURRAY L. WARDEN, City Clerk By: Ardith Davis • Deputy City Clerk • MINUTES - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting • July 27 , 1981 7 : 30 p.m. Atascadero Administration Building The meeting was called to order at 7: 35 p.m. by Mayor Wilkins with the Pledge of Allegiance. Reverend Bill Hawk of the Covenant Church gave the invocation. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Councilmen Highland , Mackey, Nelson , Stove and Mayor Wilkins ABSENT: None A. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 . Minutes of the special meeting of July 13 , 1981 (RECOMMEND APPROVAL) 2. Minutes of the regular meeting of July 13 , 1981 (RECOMMEND APPROVAL) 3. City of Atascadero and State of California , Department of Forestry/San Luis Obispo County Fire' Department Fire Protection and Fire Fighting Mutual Aid Agreement • (RECOMMEND APPROVAL AND AUTHORIZATION FOR SIGNATURES) 4 . City of Atascadero and Atascadero State Hospital Fire Protection and Fire Fighting Mutual Aid Agreement (RECOMMEND APPROVAL AND AUTHORIZATION FOR SIGNATURES) 5 . City of Atascadero and Templeton Community Services District Fire Protection and Fire Fighting Mutual Aid Agreement (RECOMMEND APPROVAL AND AUTHORIZATION FOR SIGNATURES) 6 . San Luis Obispo County-Wide Fire Protection and Fire Fighting Mutual Aid Agreement (RECOMMEND APRPOVAL AND AUTHORIZATION FOR SIGNATURES) 7. Tentative Parcel Map AT 79-065 , 5740 Rosario, John King Development (Keith Gurnee) to allow conversion of three existing apartment units into air-space condominiums (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) • 1 • CITY COUNCIL MITES JULY 27 , 1981 8. Tentative Parcel Map AT 78-121 , 8900 San Gabriel , Catherine Lewis (Hilliard) approval of one year time extension to enable completion of road requirements and • approval of road name request for road common to this application and AT 78-164 (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) 9 . Lot Line Adjustment LA 810611 : 1 , 7313 and 7345 San Gregorio, Florence Desrosier-Henry Ranellette (Stewart) to adjust existing lot - lne to resolve encroachment problem (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) 10 . Tentative Parcel Map AT 78-164 , 8920 San Gabriel , Elizabeth C. Davis (Hilliard) approval of one year time extension to enable completion of road requirements and approval of road name request for road common to this application and AT 78-121 (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) 11 . Tentative Tract Map 999 , 5525 Capistrano , RPI-V - A Limited Partnership (Walker/Lundberg) to allow conversion of 44 existing apartment units into air-space condominiums (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS) 12. Conditional Use Permit U810608 : 1 , 5830 Entrada , Mary Pulsifer (dba: Bipi Gi' s Botique) to allow establishment • of a commerical dog grooming business in conjunction with an existing resident on the ground floor (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) Mayor Wilkins reviewed all items on the Consent Calendar . Councilman Highland stated that he had a correction on page five of the minutes of July 13th regarding the Men ' s Colony expansion. He did not make the statements about the County already doing its part to provide State .penal facilities; he only agreed with the contention that the State be required to file an EIR . It was agreed that paragraph 2 of that section be deleted. Councilman Mackey wished to have item A-12 withdrawn from the Consent Calendar and considered separately. MOTION: Councilmn Highland moved for adoption of the Consent Calendar as amended , with the exception of item A-12 . The motion was seconded by Councilman Stover and unanimously carried by roll call vote. A-12 Conditional Use Permit U810608 : 1 , 5830 Entrada , Mary Pulsifer Councilman Mackey was concerned about the landscaping on this property; she asked if some conditions could be imposed to require improving the appearance of the property. Larry Stevens , Planning 2 • CITY COUNCIL MINES - JULY 27 , 1981 Director , stated that if Council wished to change the conditions or have other conditions imposed , it would be proper to determine • the conditions and refer the matter back to the Planning Commission for further consideration. MOTION: Councilman Mackey moved that this matter be referred back to the Planning Commission for landscaping standards . The motion was seconded by Councilman Nelson and carried on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Highland , Mackey, Nelson and Mayor Wilkins NOES: Councilman Stover B. HEARINGS , APPEARANCES AND REPORTS None C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1 . Resolution No. 22-81 approving Fiscal Year 1981 -82 Budget Mr . Warden stated that the Fiscal Year 1981-82 Final Budget contained all the changes approved by Council at their last hearing. There were two items , however , that he wished to get approval for which would amend the present budget. One item is • $7 ,000 for participation in a City and County narcotics enforcement program and the other is for $4 ,093 to continue the employment of Michele Reynolds who is working on the development standards for the moratorium area. This project is anticipated to be completed by October . MOTION : Councilman Highland moved for approval of trans- ferring $7 ,000 for the Narcotics Task Force and $4 ,093 for employment of Michele Reynolds through October , 1981 . The motion was seconded by Councilman Stover and unanimously carried by roll call vote. MOTION: Councilman Nelson moved that Resolution No . 22-81 be read by title only. The motion was seconded by Councilman Highland and unanimously carried . Mayor Wilkins s read Resolution No. 22-81 by Y title only. MOTION: Councilman Nelson moved for the adoption of Resolu- tion No. 22-81 . The motion was seconded by Councilman Mackey and unanimously carried by roll call vote . 2 . Adoption of Fiscal Year 1981 -82 Salary Classification Plan • 3 0 CITY COUNCIL M1jWES - JULY 27 , 1981 Mr . Warden stated that the plan presented reflected the 8 1 /2% salary increase approved by Council. Still pending are the negotiations with the Firefighters. • MOTION : Councilman Highland moved for the adoption of the 1981 -82 Salary Classification Plan. The motion was seconded by Councilman Stover and unanimously carried . 3 . Resolution No. 21-81 confirming the cost of weed abatement Mr . Warden presented Council with a list of charges for weed abatement which totalled $4 , 164 . It is in order for Council to approve the resolution so that the charges can be forwarded to the Tax Collector for inclusion in the annual tax bills . MOTION : Councilman Highland moved that Resolution No. 21 -81 be read by title '` only. The motion was seconded by - Councilman Mackey and unanimously carried . Mayor Wilkins read Resolution No. 21 -81 by title only. MOTION : Councilman Highland moved for the adoption of Resolu- tion No. 21-81 . The motion was seconded by Councilman Nelson and unanimously carried by roll call vote . D. NEW BUSINESS 1 . Street closure for Colony Days Parade • Mr. Warden stated that it is in order for Council to approve this request since the same arrangements as approved for last year will be followed. Council action will then be forwarded to Caltrans for their information and closure of the proper freeway exits . MOTION : Councilman Mackey moved that Council approve a parade to be held from 9 : 45 a.m. to 12: 00 p .m. on October 24 , 1981 , and approve the closing of El Camino Real between Pueblo and Entrada, Entrada from El Camino Real to Lewis and West Mall from El Camino Real to Capistrano. The motion was seconded by Councilman Highland and unanimously carried . E . INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION 1 . City Council (a). Mayor Wilkins stated that the Council would now vote on their selections for Planning Commissioner. The votes were cast and tabulated by the City Clerk. Those selected were Shirley Moore , Michael Sherer , Bill Carroll , and Herb LaPrade� respectively. It was noted that the terms were for four-year • 4 CITY COUNCIL MIN ES- JULY 27 , 1981 periods beginning August 1 , 1981 . • MOTION : Councilman Highland moved that Council appoint Shirley Moore , Michael Sherer , Bill Carroll , and Herb LaPrade as Planning Commissioners for four-year terms beginning August 1 , 1981 . The motion was seconded by Councilman Stover and carried with Councilman Mackey voting no. Councilman Mackey objected to the process used to determine the selectees . She did not feel that she was able to vote the way she wanted to. 2. City Attorney Mr . Grimes had nothing to report. 3 . City Manager (a) Mr . Warden stated that Don Sylvia , Fire Chief had submitted his resignation as he will be accepting a position with the City of Davis . Mr . Warden stated that he will begin advertising for this position. Mike Hicks , Fire Captain , will be acting Chief until one is selected . The resignation is accepted with regret. (b) Mr . Warden reminded the Council about the • Channel Counties Division of the League of California Cities meeting in Ventura on August 14th. He asked Council to get their reservations in as soon as possible. (c) Mr . Warden requested a closed session to discuss employee negotiations . He did not anticipate that there would be any action after the closed session. The meeting adjourned to closed session at 8 : 20 p.m. and returned to regular session at 9 : 35 p.m. The meeting adjourned at 9 : 36 p.m. Recorded by: MURRAY L . WARDEN , CITY CLERK By: Ardith Davis Deputy City Clerk • 5 CITY OF ATASCADERO TREASURER' S REPORT JULY 1, 1981 TO JULY 31, 1981 --- BALANCE AS OF JUNE 30 , 1981 $ 101,518 32 RECEIVED (PER ATTACHED) 337 ,324 .73 TOTAL $ 438 ,843 .05 **WARRANT REGISTER NUMBER 82-011 $ '' 96 , 335 . 73 1t 11 it it It 11 if It 11 82-012 `,.. 187 ,444 . 88 (Includes Payrolls 7/1 , 7/15 , &7/.29/81) PAID LISTING 150 ,277 .20 TOTAL $ 434 ,057 . 81 BALANCE AS OF JULY 31, 1981 $ I' 4 ,785 . 24 PETTY CASH $ 150 .00 LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND $ 175 ,000 .00 TIME DEPOSIT, SECURITY PACIFIC NATIONAL BANK 18 . 50% Interest, Matures 8/13/81 $ '' 100 ,000 .00 TIME DEPOSIT, SANTA BARBARA SAVINGS 18 . 50% Interest, Matures 8/16/81 $ 100 ,000.00 TIME DEPOSIT, FIDELITY SAVINGS 15.25% Interest, Matures 8/24/81 $ 's 100 ,000 .00 • TIME DEPOSIT, SECURITY PACIFIC NATIONAL BANK 13 . 875% Interest, Matures 9/14/81 $ '°± 100 ,000 . 00 TIME DEPOSIT, BANK OF AMERICA 18 . 50% Interest, Matures 9/14/81 $ 100 ,000 .00 TIME DEPOSIT, MID-STATE BANK 13 . 00% Interest, Matures 9/14/81 $ ' 100 ,000 .00 TIME DEPOSIT, MID-STATE BANK 15. 50% Interest, Matures 10/20/81 $ 100 ,000 .00 TIME DEPOSIT, SECURITY PACIFIC NATIONAL BANK 16 . 25% Interest, Matures 10/20/81 $ 100,000 .00 TIME DEPOSIT, BANK OF AMERICA 16 . 00% Interest, Matures 11/16/81 $ '' 100,000 .00 TIME DEPOSIT, CENTURY FEDERAL SAVINGS 18 . 25% Interest, Matures 11/18/81 $ " 100 ,000 .00 TIME DEPOSIT, SECURITY PACIFIC NATIONAL BANK 17.125% Interest, Matures 11/19/81 $ ' 100,000 .00 $1,279, 935 .24 • **Due to computer delay Warrant Register 82-012 will be distributed upon receipt. CITY OF ATASCADERO TREASURER' S REPORT JULY 1, 1981 TO JULY 31 , 1981 I, RALPH H. DOWELL, JR. , do hereby certify declare that the demands enumerated and referred to in the foregoing register are accurate and just claims against the City and that there are funds available for payment thereof in the City Treasury. RALPH H. DOWELL, JR. Finance Director MU RAY L. WARDEN City anager • -2- RECEIVED LISTING JULY 1, 1981 TO JULY 31 , 1981 • TAXES Sales & Use Tax " 37 ,500 . 00 Occupancy Tax 4 ,294 . 62 LICENSES/PERMITS 8 ,741 .20 REVENUES/RENT investments 872 . 57 Rents & Concessions 1, 512 .37 Rebates 134 . 80 REVENUE/AGENCIES Vehicle "In Lieu" 22,895 . 25 Cigarette Tax 3 ,900 . 01 Off-Highway Vehicles 111 . 62 Dial-A-Ride Farebox 740. 75 Performance Bonds 2 ,594 . 36 CHARGES FOR CURRENT SERVICES 5 ,021 .89 GAS TAX 9 ,286 .12 • REVENUE SHARING 39 ,661.00 RECREATION 16 ,491 . 65 FROM L.A. I.F. 65 ,000 .00 FROM TIME DEPOSIT 100 ,000 .00 MISCELLANEOUS 559 .08 PRIOR YEAR REVENUE 18 , 007 .44 TOTAL $337 , 324 . 73 • -3- t T 817,' 0 PAGE NO. 1 DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. ?12-011 DATE 0 7/c`*1 PAYEE WARRANT CHECK OUCHER DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTEN NO. DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTCHG'D INV.NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT cLIIC-NT R 8t.KFS n8 nl- G'f�tw?1� 17ta1� 1 `�t Ca , 4 T? ^,Y^T 7 tipc .76 ' nT ,S "IITIJAL ;°,'ATE? Cr+ i4T -rlii, 0C 001w4aG>J-252 670281 1 .Jti9.77 5711 1065.77 ALERT- ITr 01 -2701-Orin �'f?�'S1 9?.75 Tl_10Lt 111-27()1-0100 E 17..2 1-4p 7Q 9C' 60311 FF.-`'T.at_ rrI F`?FP�"'? 01_4l1U2-217 E.�23F�c 97 �`2- E P2366 710 171c 34n 7G . . T CT C T Inti_ EP501, n y w1 ?24 O l 120. 00 ~71 120 . 00 0 ♦ • (,04 VTtA T,, ;al`PPLF - 1�33 1 l �.60 571u 116.60 rLTFr C? T ;>T n rr= ? 7/ .(i7-41 t 5 1103 192. 510 571 5 192.50 , COi, Tr-,lCT T',. ST? -4,00;,'5 611o07-a1. G8-2? ' 00a 195, 00 571 1o6.00 leARF. ! JLI t,n`iTYfl( T T ,ST ^l4ri'1'tt' 00_ 2.51. . 00 h9r! Cr:uT' ";CT T,. Trrpt: ?r?r)v"!S r,/07-41 t) 007 1 D?. 43 57 t7 38? 43 h.tirt F r C-1-4401-21 ? 752 2'l 7 571 e 29 . 67 TA' 7/61w nl -4pop-?t)2 6 571 60 .001 • I I I I I -4- AT^LC++r-E PAGE NO. 2 SE MAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 62-111 DATE 07/20/81 Q PAYEE WARRANT CHECK N JUC DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTEN DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTCHG'D INV.NO, AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT u ,�• 9FR,V 1c / —1?/ 12 til-2'7til—s100 2013 1{ = se74 ma c; ;!IS Sr V 01—�'7Qt -8o0 2814 177'i ,a8 12/2? 81-2701 -000 2015 1 ''19* :)4 , C! IIS S 12/29-1 /= tl 1—c7n1—(100 2 !6 _5 1ia2.E5 Li 'V1 /5-1 /� nl^_7C°1 -880 2066 c • 57PG 718..,,55 CALIc ASCi-JC nF PV,,K/!aEr,P-,kT'( 57P1 65.00 T"'- TF 000-I ,9t"ORTH 07-410A—P241 00._ 31 .50 5722 31, 50 A PL.kti 7/°-7/100:1-41- 0r—?!18 17 .bv 57? 17 ,60 0 5 1 ''P+'L•`.r_ `Pi;''T"'t LER 11«2118-000 21. 093 s 9 ,FC; Li,'j+,i r r P!_ Y;rfCl t!! p., TL.B "1- 2710-000 2P772 131 . 10' 5724 1U6.95 X8,5 f.";: ;TCi,L `;1.1P LTL_S 01-4202-210 1551? 6?.33 57 PC 62.33 1 E G8� 5r--rt 01-2..711-000 3477 60 1`i 9726 69. 15 CT ?i.ST I.:L! � ' ! / 1 ;-t�7—%:10 —P2l-' 00 . 175. 0ii q7%- 175.00 rrvPYI,` I i_tFVf:L''.PN'E.r I- D F P T 5Ti%T /; ri/=,1 --h/ �1. t 1—�_'1h1_nc;2 0/812P-? . 76 57?8 2237.76 ? 97?q11 � F —5— 1T„�rnEc t PAGE NO. 3 DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. -?1 t DATE 07!201 PAYEE WARRANT CHECK .00HER DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTEN NO. DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTCHG'D INV.NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT Fj 1"CTi'TC Y !)U pt. -Ci Rijljj, 3F 1 ?0! ;gal L ^ .TS n1 -41109.-P16 07147 1 1 .1 . `U 5730 111 . 30 F T �E5Tr"'F FT:l , c 7 TT,FS � 12027 373. 15 5731 373. 15 ukc VT v:T,;INIF T P 7- 410A-224 00 . 796143q 83. 00 5732 63 .00 r.fF P�CiF4,GcT "!__ 5 .'rc h/j -6 01 -271n-O(,f} laUO.00 -;64 n. TLPer-F. TPI-Cr fTY NSS(tf r 1-271. ;z-1?u�? 173 1' .40, 0 -271n-nOC 430 .0 5713 2147 .30 J T`,9 t R c ; A • bc�[l C • T{ ,N T 'IFF 51. 00 573L 50 .00 tNPFm" , T :c 01-2710-0QO 1614120 7 .05 573 7 .05 C10 r;F s� T-vhLtr c 01 -2710-nU0 2 6,)7 43?.46 573 432.48 494 T Tr,f 7T,t r+0cf:L H/9-7l j 0 7-4108-224 0 0`4 166.00 5737 188 . 00 C?t C T TI' ,T:," Ctljc, F/1. S-707- 410'1-?c1! OU' 160, 00 5738 160 .00, ;PT F r ,! 4 NP8751 22n . n6 � PFs n1-4106-31 6751 2?.01 • -6 A T A ri C,4-FI E P PAGE NO. 4 SAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 2-011 DATE 07/20/81 PAYEE WARRANT CHECK CHER DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTEN DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTCHG'D INV,NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT C"'P TFC ('L,PT� 4 nl-t11�?-z19 X83751 14� T1 h TYf-�.'i 'ITF:R2401 C'-PT ~' 7~ .5 1-4201-j_`0 ;N.g8751 163 Ct rT_�' rt CUpI 01-4P02-3 30 Iu A,1;751 1 '!.=z7 T- P e rrnl�� 01-40101 -31. 2 ati 6 751 ( Tii�TL w. rtj. 07-41OP-713 :°,jFt87,1 s;;- , `, 57? 862. 07 95 Cr . T 1r:oT ? 1--N3" F':.`f <,/ 1 .�- .t l. :;l (:,a_22t� 007 4P. Oo 1574c, 42.00 PLF't_ (; 1 /C Y c/;i PF:LT3 05-44101 -P21I 0^ 731 g.a7 F� t'1 AC P,;A6TL: CYLIr:01F: a 4,^5-4tJ01 -22A 00x729 97 .87 5741 157.84 K4TSF-�i '-AND A:-In �,RAVNL F nS'r'�ti ' T 01-2710-000 201606 351}.h2 01-271 00 0P1 .,07 1�= 3 5 ,?—n � � z 5711 P 540 .45 * -r r t 7 01-2710-000 0 29n1 32. 00 574 32.00 -i7 F:;il iar, r T i k C^LL 9E PO 01-2710-000 12-T5 59.36 5742 59.36 Irl Crl, 'Toc CT I ST ► 5.t`"i'PP0 7/ 07-111 uH-2211 ori_ 19:. 91 5 7 a 192.50 ;a itiiTLF;' ,,r.r JI';:E �/ 1 -11/70 01 -4401 -P03137 .04 9744, 137 .04 d.- TP—ST TF 'ZK 7 1_ 'A'": �''1F...1C Ct,r..i ftt r 111-t pop -313 '7/d 1, 90 a 37 Lr;;a';I T;: ^CT��? C� 1 -4,10P-311 7 /,b1 7b%� ,03 57117 225F.87 -7 .!;)T 1 .75 -7- PAGE NO. 5 J DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. DATE 07/21101 PAYEE OUCHER WARRANT CHECK NO DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTEN DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTCHG'D INV.NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT 657 L'IUST CUP 01-00-211 1491A 1. .75 -. c Sts DUST mup 01-ARO2 11 t499A 1 .7, 687HO �� ���P TO'.Fcl_ S 01-402-215 1WA U,9,3 687 C000^L_L^ 01-4001-02 1411A 6 .71 587 C0V'& ?LL_6 01-40"14P 4.95 667 CnV E ELLS A 1-420j-P4T 1194A 0 .71 187 018H TQ .;FI_zi 01-MOP-?5n 10145 5 . 53 h87 DISH Ti ELS P1-42UP-250 14914 3.55 687 C:TSH T.".3nEL:3 14958 6. 62 5741 40 .08 87 BIJUN SR ^,I. TC rnLTC'Y 01- 4301 -235 10470 1326.00 9749 1326 .00 694 CONTRACT QSTO POYE S 6/107-410= -220 00 .7 POS.05 5751'[ 20'2.25 t,55 1000 FIME I&PUTECT FADER. 01 -4202-209 b3105F 6P.50 5751 61100 FAPDY NU ..,TCKT 6?a COATS °.CT OFTIC14/ PYTCF' 07-01 8-2.24 001 72.00 5752 72.00 KODTH COUNTY CONT;= ACTORS ASS 688 MIFkAEOMP ODES 7/Y 1 01--402-?02 7 /81 100,70 9753 100 .70 OLTVER s WILLIAMF 688 ELEVATOP Q VTC" .JULY 01 -4dO9-224 002071 61 .05 575[1 61 .25 ns _ATS HIST'^. FLFCTRIC 580 TUNF-HP 6 RF1- AIP vONEY CP05-4401-220 002206P 61. 6 57V 62 .08 P R Y A l 595 CnpTy !P STQ Ut `Y`1i b/22-71n7-4102-224 007 A30 . 50 5756 430 .50 PACIP17 TAT R QLFCT`.'T[. 46F EL_t T ,P ,q. t ,,c� . 2 /f.: 1��ig( r- r7 197 .7° • -8- A T1,S t'r r lJ PAGE NO. 6 db DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. { ?-011 DATE 07/20/R1 PAYEE VOUCHER WARRANT CHECK NO. DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTEN DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTCHG'D INV.NO, AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT 5.73 1771-'7 3 .wt it Fr 51 -r:lr3n;,. i� 6/5-71 P f 1 . 75 5757 382.711 i ij:�r TC; r Pl 0y c •c i rTT $Y j 366'A 1FTTr Gt TL( irl z— f .w n— `" ' T 1 ` i 1 1 16, 0Qh 9F,62. 1G 5758 9682. 12 ' n SPEP C''. .'S zyn,� 1 ',IT r 01.-2710—con 061)981 25.31 575 , 25.31 �r Tc? Vit, ' ,FL^ j"'v' S` )f' ,6 n �f'FLn Ti, TLrATc 05615 1s, 00 5760 0 .00 PTT:yFY T,-r `FTFR 7 /1-9/3n P1-4106-?2u 004717 .70 y70- 5761 47 .70 �� F � 111.1; ^• c 6/15 A; b/-7 05-4401 -a2O 0OP7720 20.00 5762 20.00 8u' C iTj At`T F� [CI '�i. r�r?':FLI� n7wr�7.0 _a2u A01 140 . 00 576_ 140 .00 FST"I E^ A U T 0 r y1.{ T`i hr. Cil-4?op-215 914613 5.25 576 5.25 694 0,r-T' PCT T:,,c.T) PIF"'CE 7/ 107-4108-a2u 00 57. 50 576c 37 . 50 f1 r �-, T i T µ i 1 710-000 4-5-0 60 . n0 76 600 .00 ?.., i v 1 c, v • TT j rrCj T/I v'r;F TSC ,' {17- +1.1" OG" 1 ,40 . 00 9767 140 .00 • 9- 0 0 AT A Sr I OET.'-` PAGE NO. 7 DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. r- <j 1 1 DATE 07/2Cq PAYEE WARRANT CHECK NO. DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTEN N0. DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTCHGD INC NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT CITY OF RAN LIT ; f,,=' IF4 ,do ITh ')TA ,^ PKnEQI CPMP n1-2160 -107 3128 17935,55 i6q LT' ICIT,' ZN.iumhi (';.; FnGL 01-4201-237 31 /82 019.50 0 LT XIX ITY I"SURANC E PnOL 01-42CP -237 81W 5n19.50 8Q L1421LITY INSFwAym PnOL 01-4401-237 81/82 23036 .50 69 LIATILITY .i^'Sm';r';=. PnOL 07-410-237 81182 3019,50 5768 51730 .55 .60 GbS 07-a?7F-'-+7 . ;PQ1 -T 6/01-VO?-230 19.76 9769 15 .76 SANTA "APIA THE C0 .89 VOU' T 1 BALANCE TIFF 05-4401 -220 0025A9lo 4.00 _8q AnuNT & FbL 1 ]('r 2 TI FS 05-4001-220 0025SS90 16.00 577c 24.00 80 KAX, ti T R IPRF?, nC D bLtJCKOI -2710-000 89225 989.20 • act Sn4p, wAkn CLF { " F p ^:,0P x 0j -4c>0A-:11 94724 429,09 M© VALHON C;Lt`ANE 01-•440::5-313 9911. 8 112. 12 >,e `r ^ C;; CLt A04-4005-313 95118 6b?,00 5771 1791 ,41 SAN 10010 FTN EQUIP CO TNf ,b9 1000 FT FT;<F YJQE J1-2710-000 2G76 2p46.g5 577P 2846 .95 TAM LUIS ATHLETIC SUPPLy !an SOFTKPLL PAVES & PL."TP5 07-41UP-QU 0013!59 635,59 577' 635.89 , ILL ,oaf ° Cr-, qu C:O TRIC:T OFFICIAL SPcN!✓EpA7-41. 08-224 0017/ 15 30 ,00 5774 30.UC mILORED RPAPIT7 q5 CnpT;:. i; _=,T > 3uA?IT1 6/ 1`-07-41UP-224 003 336. 00 5775 336 .00 � C1 ,"AIN ,gip;_: A '. 6/ 1.7-1/PU 01-2 / 10-000 50 . 'x:) • -10- nTnGC :'!E2'� PAGE NO. 8 DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 62--011 DATE 07/20/61 PAYEE WARRANT CHECK N0.. OUC DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTEN DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTCHG'D INV.NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT 691 l'iT6P,aTrh 6/5_6/ 13 tit;��=fl 5-77 151 .20 T f C11 QTY(- G . T;,,T 'C- f',F-CTe A PR0G . 01-4Po?-?G2 1 �)0.00 5777 150 .00 TnYLiln: T !_ CE(`'TF1 6q7 nri,1T l_ cr,`I��;j� ^`iT4 01-271 -000 1020 210.50 577e 210 .56 hyo C^r;T ; 1.1`ItiT`< TuJi,2P„Zit1'� ,/? ;07-4108-?2s 00-7 56.Qf� 5 /7 , 56.00 LJ `",ia TGG -L!_ ., a5 rrZ.,Th I ,:STN TA'�Rc!_ 6/15-7r}7-41 0P-2211 nt;_ ?_2�l ,()0 INST R TAR<<,^.F (107, 190. 40 5780 014 .40 G A6,-L , ',r= 1 n6 j-c, ;2j 01-271f.-000 063081 20?.?f? ,,A 7+rn1-2710-000 063031. ?77 .52 tiy1r� rl� = 3 - �r�,?_: r 01 -2.7I0-000 t1h3(lu1 102` . 4 571 1506.26 UTKT% 6 FQ—TCHT 621 F ' r"T:a;1T f-r;,;P Ll''EP, 01-2710-000 7g4186 17 . 45 691 r n E T,'; r P()TF 01-2710-000 7960813 17 ,48 `- 111 r=rT�Z�;'1 C0'^:-1-ITER 01-2710-000 797061 23,47 57BE 58.43 f b9? C01) 1T, V T T�. ,31 P jV l_iaS 411E7 07-41 0' -220 00 112.00 1"46 T il VP;_ 6/ t 07T410R-2?11 nU_ 42, 00 572 154,00 621 jT,(" ��1 Tr JF LT :� rl -<�1 t,?-r 2? 2n77? l .fig rct2 T(ir. r. -t= Tf.;F �zi:P L ICS 1 t)p-?2? 222x13 211 .87 .9? 6T,.;r,4, VPTCF Soppl_T=ti n1–Ll1 ()?-2?2 22264 5,n7 �`r? 7.c F;T :.iT y� T1' r} 1–U1-(1r..Zi7 2?_ 197 1, 52,6-14 �9 ? iTi 7� r T�'F �'U�1'!_ ) 61-4106-222 20772 11 .33 • -11- • • II PAGE NO. 9 DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. =`2- X11 DATE 07/2 10 PAYEE WARRANT CHECK ]OCHER NO. DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTEN DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTCHG'D INV.NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT 69? STUCK OFFTCF pUppI_IFS 01 -4106-P22 2P263 1A . 92 44P STOCK GFFTCE 9UPD FS n1-410 ?-222 22264 3. 04 591 5FCP4T,,?y CrAV, +01-x 706-305 20838 131 .65 097 C4A14 ,,IAT 0DATCH 01-41116-312 29329 203.5E ,93 Ck ?lk mAT OTS ATCH 01-41l^-P1G 2009 1 . &I ,9% STOCK GFFTCF ?UPPL I`--S 01-010-222 20772 40. 13 =q2 STM OFFT09 SUPPLIrS 01-411 '-P2P 2P263 64.67 59? STOCK OFF TCE SUPPI T53 nl -4110-?%? 2?264 13. 19 03 C HATO . ;AT 0136 TiCH O1-Vo -210 20629 100 .76 09? STOCK Os=FICP AUOPI_IFS 01,62 5 C1-a2P ,�n772 6,69 594 STOCK OFF T C4 5UPPUTFS 01-42+)1-•22? 22263 74 .6? 097 STOCK ::17F7F SUPPLTE5 01-4201-222 22264 15.22 099 PnSTIn T7AY k !NPEY 01-4POI -244 2?272 60 . 14 697 CHAIR NAT OTSPATCH 01-°40 2-Plo 22252 101 .51 nc�? STVCK OFFICE quPPLIFS 0j-4P0?-?32 20772 15. 11 090 STtsQK OFFTCF GU°Pt IFS 'AJ-429R-28p 22263 19.40 591 STOCK OFFTCi RUPPLIFS 01 -4262-222 22264 4.06 ;9z CHATR CAT QT3PATCN' 01-4401-210 20829 15P.64 51? ST +CK eFFTCF ROPPLT75 01-4W-22'.2 20772 28.35 49? STICK: OFFTCF �RuPPI IES 01-44V1 -?22 22263 37 ,31 _ . _ • -,ac .',T �,, s�!'FTL'= �InF.LI �.r_i 61-42101-222 22264 761 =,G? STUCK OFFTCF SUOPLITS 07-4108.-22? 20772 q.44 692 STOCK OFFTCE c:.;PP IFS 07-41t1R-222 22263 1207 591 STOCK OFF TH RuOPLIES 07-4109-222 22264 2,56 5764 1544 .98 191 CAR ,_`LMANCE JULY 31-41 1?- P01 7/61 150, 00 5785 151.00 L aPPY HERSTFr 593 CONTRACT nFFjrjPL/ P5SfFw07-4108-22a 6000 970 60.00 apcy 594 CrkT ; IiCT OFFICIAL/ NG0 7207-410E-P24 001 150 . 00 7787 150.00 PON 41450;� 590 C"-TRACT "FFICIAL .,:TLSO"= 07-41OP-?2ri 0017/1.6 20 , 90 5788 20 .00 hqv LOV TAPL7 R fCrIygsnRy S;4CI -2710-000 51357 104. 36 • -12- AT^ PAGE NO. 10 MAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. DATE 07/20/81 PAYEE WARRANT CHECK CHER o. DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTEN u DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTCHG'D INV.NO. AMOUNT NO, AMOUNT 8:G P,—:NTsRL`" F;,-SE!- ? r) J ..271;1—!1ii0 5135ta 187 .94 `5789 292 .30 is —13— 0 ATS 33,r PAGE NO. 11 DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. DATE 07/2 PAYEE WARRANT CHECK OCHER NO. DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTEN DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTCHG'D INV.NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT 4 =?ITT ` 96335.73 PREPAID ,00 ACCQIJFu .00 TOT,-'.I- 96-735.73 „F r h, IF Y F!! PPF. -PA I I:, WR I T T E N FIJ Hl 01 ,0" 87129.29 171W,sn 04 .00 662.00 F IJ N0 5 .00 26/4.32 F;I,;"! ^7 . Ott 8280 . 12 • • —14— 0 PAID LISTING JULY 1, 1981 TO JULY 31, 1981 • 7/8/81 Mid-State Bank P2078 LAIF Deposit $ 50,000 .00 7/15/81 Gaye Lowe P2085 Salary Adj ._ 40 .10 7/23/81 Security Pacific P2097 Time Deposit 100 ,000 . 00 . 7/31/81 Mace Delp P2110 Final Ck/CETA237 .10 TOTAL $150,277 .20 • • -15- S • • ATASCADEPO 1 22-_012 07/31/81 A T asr.rGrR0 NEYs '700 AD PU5 HEAR AT70-O SS 01-4110-247 i A72 12. 72 000 A& M i-'i-AR TkACT ' 999 01-4110-247 F873 12.72 000 AG PU& HEAR UEE PVT U810601-4110-247 F171 12;7P . ;700 "D P:.i r HEAN W10020 : 1 (11-4110-2U7 Q70 13.66 5560 51 .34 1700 PULICE C R LFAS 01-4201-001 1/31 294t?.62 1700 REPAN SEL l ;IT 3 01-4201-215 r _15 1 ✓���,c` 1-,.0+) X865 30()1wt?L ATUCAM0 FOOD 699 POLICE CAR LEASE 01-4201-001 7/31 cRgV9.62 P2080 2989 .62 AM AUTUAL SAW CO 700 MATER 16-1000 01-4202-232 070881 40.00 700 vATFQ 19-70QO 01 -429?-232 070061 91 .27 700 . OTER 15-422000 01-4400-232 070951 252.96 70.E ATEc 17-4500(, 01-4406-232 070gdl 211 . 11 700 ATER 93000 I-444 -232 070131 388.72 700 ,.,A . ._R F-M000 01-4405-212 070151 124.47 700 °-• A ER 2-3MM0 01-4405-232 G70151 4.00 5866 1112 , 15 ST15 Fi=MAL CREDIT U IW- - 699 CREDIT l On DEPOSITS 1 1 �i 0 -4� 6`„-s105 070161 896,50 P:2074 896.50 bqq CREC 1T UNION } l_F}OSIT 01-2160-005 071581 896.50 P2089 896.50 ATASC.,PFRO POLICE ASIOCIATI 699 POLICE ASSOC OUR$ 01-2160-004 070151. 90.00 P2073 90.00 699 POLI';= A590C n` ES 01 -216U-004 071531 80 .06 P2080 80 ,00 700 1 - 95 A P BATTERY ol-271 ,E-000 1163 54 , 75 5067 54.75 } ATASCAM ) 2 z2-t)1c 07/31/ 31 ATASCnD_RO CARPET 9 I4TERIO 3700 TIL'_ APP _,HFiIVe 01-4105-217 X46? 223.72 5868 223.72 CALIF SAt=`Gnano SPECIALISTS 5702 ,OGGLFSr LENS AND STRAPS 61-4202-210 25120 124, 02 5869 124.02 L " CURTIS 1 SOM 37QI MAIM= RIM 1GASYET50114202-215 il%ryEo979 351 . 1.2 5870 331 . 12 r'HcVRi;;i4 3751 GASOLINE 792-060-065-2 01-4201 -219 071781 54.61 3711 GASOLINE 792-060-05-2 05-WI-062 071731 323.04 . 5371 377 .65 CG;Rr, T; ;NSIT SMS, 1"r 002 -. , E VT.Cn 6/22-AM 01-2710-000 2490 1447 . 15 3712 sus SERVICE 6/29-1/30 01-2710-000 2491 55x. 12 5172 2003,27 CITY-CC F E0 CIEDIT UATQ- ,,' 3699 CREDIT !.; lOw OEPOSITS 01-2160-005 670181 92.50 P2075 92 .50 3699 CREDIT UNION DEPOSIT 01-2160-005 971531 92.50 P?090 92.50 =4599 CRE01T !.. .109 DEPOSIT AYACI-2150-005 072951 3�,00 P2106 30.00 CCL;'NY US! 'SSS SYSTEWS 5701 1 PART LETTER PAPEP 01-4102-22.2 7-74 2. 19 :701 1 FART WTER PAM 01-4106-222 7-74 - 1 .31 wow 1 PA eT LETTRO PAPEP 01-4110-222 7-74 5.59 5701 1 PQT 0T E4 PAPEP 01-4201-222 7-74 6 .56 170t I FART LiTTIR PAPE 01-420- 222 7-7a 1 .75 :701 1 PjRT LHTTE. F4MP ol-u'-t_222 7-74 &2.3 :701 1 ?K T L=TTE t PAPH? 07-4 i 0,` Q22 7-774 1 . 0q 5873 21 .87 CHICAGO PPAGE LA FILL 1708 QU-PT4 .. ES 01 -4002-2110 KIM 21 .00 587u 21 .00 -117 12-01.2 07/31/B1 COM EL CT MIC 702 RECONOUG TAPE ?1=c1 .+h-21 ;,i 00639 5.49 5575 5.49 r„ALIFOR A TAXPAYER8 ASSN 712 BOOK "477 WASH 3..36 5876 3.36 CRESCEnT TFUCK L1103 702 r EI ,t'i — CO PUTS 4' u � , x -�71C-t:==ter} 44�123 17 .51 5577 17 .51 COPTf_. HnS SPORT 702 200 O TF L 07-4108-001 69341C 846.00 5878 843.00 Cin'UNT,PY HARWAQ INC 702 CHAIP L i, K EEC! _r; 01-4464-216 6692 112.36 5679 112.36 STATE OF 1 AL E c. OU 699 MFI; <S AITH U{_DING 55ROI-2100-000 I 9. 35 (2093 109.35 699 ,1RNI GS IT HOL.,I C:S 5`01-2].00-000 191 .06 P2105 191 ,08 DA CY PRI&TRG CO. 699 CUPUTL < UPPLIES 01 -4301-210 8025 790,23 P2081 790.23 STEVEN 0 000GL SSp 0,0. 702 PHYSICAL RGY WONG 01-4401-210 07C651 81 . 00 5888 61 .04 STr VE nEVENCEM 699 CONTRAXT PLAnMF„ PA HRS 01-4110-005 436 .60 P2077 436.130 694 C9 3T :HCl' PLANNER 07 HPS 609.70 P2107 609.70 ATASCADERO 4 07/31/81 EXXCN Co US;s, 1703 GASOLINE 02-M-gan n 01-4201-219 072061 644,93 5793 GASOLINE 1 _ f'- _ 03-W-A 01-4402-219 072021 14M, 5703 GA30LIN M-M-p 4n-u 01-4&04-20 072081 91 ,6's 3703 rA60L I NG 132-505-q40-9 05-4401-002 072081 32,so sial 783.79 EL WHO BUILDING SUPPLY 1703 TILE; CIT1 R 01-4U05-221 17396 43.71 5882 Q5.71 R03 CAP &HES 601 01-4201-215 15 070101 34.61 5883 34 .60 FLECTP IC SUPPLY OF PASO R&L 003 WMER STRIPS 01-4405-217 9202 193.53 5884 193.53 V«F,..ON ELLIOTT 699 AUVANCE SCHOOL a/2-8/6 01-4202-236 394.00 P2101 394400 Fli STC':'_ STOPES .,703 5 TIRES 01-2710-000 112761 252.86 5885 252,86 FIL 'S INCORPORATED 7703 FILM HAPPLL: L}'OPL1AC G G07- 4108-002 576440 103.00 '703 FILK "UNTOENTIFIEU FLYING07-010e-002 576441 88.00 5886 191 .00 ALEXANDER GRANT I CC 703 CO" PUTE9 SERVICE 7111 01-4301-239 08079 023.55 SW 823.55 -703 FLASHLIGHT5 AND 3ATTERI`. OI-4202-lir; 07651 206.06 703 LWGUAPY U MLLA AND SPOI-4604-219 07429 30 ,72 5888 236 .78 ;I. 703 "POLICE 40GE " CLOTH PATCOI-=4201-2015 5041 38 . 16 5889 35. 16 r.TA;;Cf'.D a.R t —i? 12 07/31/8 : t'r Lr T1 -p,C 1 r 3704 r+J';;';�GT! KITS ; I. .`;i�LjTi Y 01-271t}.,,00.0 y50754 111 i 9: 37011 TAFFS , RI 's , rPI. T 'P01-2710-Ol00 552766 °#22.41► Sc.90 1024,4 p 11' 3704 TYF'P,rt<IT ? 7 `1,02-301, T7L924 7'..56 3704 1'Yr[: RITC u2On1?= 7! - / 1-41i2.. 01 }a < ta c;,' ? 5891 162.51 T. +T 'L CITY _: A;Fr !_ :T A58- 37014 58-3704APf kEN, 01-4102-202 071166 269. 32 5692 2698: 3704 AC ASSOCIATE PLAi,!o'Lh' 01-4102-248 311412 23.10 5893 23.8( J0LLFY ' Th 1 SE R IC. 370!; TO"., 05-4401-002 17 3- 25.00 37011 TO US 0'5-1#401-002 27 <5 25.00 5894 50•0i 37011 a rAPT7S .0 F ,��r:c 01-4102-222 P-7 9 9 7 .95 3704 ? r'ART N'FSSA G E F Ci,"'8 01-01 06-222 2799 41.77 37011 2 PAPT "ES;SA3�r FiC.,-!c r,l-u11C,-2q'_2 2799 2+}.67 3701 2 PAr.T "^ S`A.^r"_ Fri'"S 01-420 1-222-1 ;?7 9 q 23.x35 37 AP 01.-cRae2-%22 2799 6 .35 3704 2, NA`�TM.r"L,.SA1- F ,,,: 5 0 -44;?1--cc2 �?799 11 .9:5 3705 PA,?T ES8AGL F!"', r8 07-41 03-2-22 2799 3.99 5895 79.51; 3705 ?FST - PA�' Ii = LOT 01-4301-254 8 6,1 .00 5396 400.(110 H L L Pnu0 -3699 i'u 'r: 1 G LUCT Pf_ T 01-4,'1-254 7/61 A00 . 00 P2079 400 0 J ,; L t)V r << .3609 Xs=rr: S� 1. ;ta01-23P2100 35. 01 AT �6C,AC,,ER 6 82-1)1a 07/31/81 Kart ;; LL'` t`� 3 `39 C�.:1 :7IAC-T PL,AO7-41 ,s6-003 ti 6c 941 17c5.00 P2083 175.CC; LA , :'`'F r LEGAL R�PP[D TIP I 3705 Wt SC.?IPT "L L; E".;' LEGAL 01-4201-234 ti/81 12.50 5697 12.50 rt::-iA , , f :> %SAL 3699 ivV C 7/22-01-4201-236 157.00 P2O94 150.00 !;i ZC-S T ATz- sANT`\ 3'705 9ZAL-A- S�5 VA14 L �a;� PMT ,�,5-44; 1>�.u3 0801,51 350.97 3715 !=-iAL- i-TIS= VAt ;'i PAT 05,-4401-�?0 O6C,1 � 1 1107 .32 5898 1458.29 ;!T;'j -STATS ?K« 3699 FEt,F'.AL IT[°H-Ci DIS-' 01-2160-001 0+701;31 7 30,7 .'04 P2O76 7307.04 3698 LCAN TaY E•.:T `zi 5E.5 05-4401-003 7/51 145 ;;.29 P2O83 1458.29 3699 FF-E. ,'E L "ITHH11-3L-DIt"'G 01-2160-001 (?715c 1 7053.79 P2O91 7083.79 3699 FEPF-kAL I:TH'H01-1)D`G, 01-2160-001 0729;31 9365.37 P21O4 9365.37 3705 ,tJ, 1 0P 01-4202-211 1905A 1 .75 3705 C!!1.1.3T iG 0 i—42?0?-21 1 151,2A 1 .75 3765 540 F' T0Vt SLS 01-4202-215 1505 A 4. 5o 3705 't^"V:.c'A � ? � ?� . �3 37015 r (?U'F ?. LL 1512A 6 .71 37°05 -,1 T _ . L 01-4202-'30 13053 5.53 3705 11414P-02—R 50 151 ?,3 3.53 5699 24.70 n>±Tj `IL 37 P L.[' _ zen..7 Q,, 1 C 1 7/ 1 7 . 53 ATASCADEW-1 7 07/31/€11 3706 OA60LI lE OS 3-030-750-1 01-4201-219 7/01 26.54 3706 GA OL1 •F 833-00-756-1 CI -4401-219 7/81 28.2 3706 i ASOLInE 813-130-755-1 05-WI-002 7/61 1022.74 5900 1154, 16 MYr ?S- TE Vr DS & Cu INC 3705 INSURANCE FI :MEN 6/ 1-6/301-0202-107 127 .50 59�� r . 1 127 .5 MONTGONERy 3705 °a1:`rO a. FA :S 01 -4201-242 965323 109.84 5902 109.84 NORTH COUNTY FIRE PROTECTIM 3705 RF-CHARGE 2 EXTInGUISHERS01-4201-001 1749 47 .08 3706 PURCHASE 4 EXTINGUISHERS 01-4201-242 17 :9 220.48 5903 267 .56,: NORTH COUNTY CONTRACTORS AS8 3699 VVI^ CA 1575:' 01-42u2-202 5753 100.70-5753 . 100 .7t; GREgT8 AUTO ELECTRIC 3706 AUJ CHOKE, CAPS , TIMING k05-4401-002 2n59 145.21 5904 145,21 PACIFIC GAS rLrCTPIC 3706 ELECTQIC ,IR47-25c202-8 61-4201-229 0710dl 27 .66 3706 ELECTRIC HR18-1 :bo l -4 01-4202-227 070981 115.80 3706 ELECTRIC M37-56451.-1 01-4402-227 070911 219.45, 3706 E; E T41C W35-01006-9 01-4004-227 , 070981 1 .75 5905 364,66 PACIFIC T_L ;RHOV 3707 PrIC.N C 05-466,-WO. 5 34-k 01-4102-228 0721081 213.86 � , 3707 r��!'l =, ^1,�._—fit»— ?(7f}ij-4 5 ,{..a'; 01-410b-228 072001 106 .9 37107 ar;6 01-4110-223 072081 142,57 3707 P}-I90E Ob-46 b- 1600-1 69- 01-4201-226 072081 144.25 3706 ,-Ht:.HE 01-4202-225 071181 13.50 3706 PHM F 01-4202-226 071101 13.50 3707 P'H[:' , F 01-4202-228 17201 293,59 3707 '.}ErtOPE 6 00-50RB-c 1 3-m ni-4202-228 071981 25.315 3707 01.-4202-226 072081 125.00 4T:j:;C:ACER; S -G12 07/31/81 3707 -HC ^` "-uF6-30 0 0-51-4 01-4 ;01-2ck 07P-0.31 1l:'2.57 3706 r' 10; AT SC."kDEP(I c S2—' 12 07/31/3: r^ ll_TC"En+;CT:5 3706 w; v7 �4t_35+. T? i' i%i9 , I , _ ;1• tF r, l..a;'� if 1 32.fa` 59� c� 7 .32. :_ PASO 1—Z ICE •3699 . . ;IASK T-:Tp 07—% 1iz,-r t _ 567 . ` } r20�3Fi 5367e t 3716 lJ,` iFc; '7 fj .'s C 4.i 70 9 1,9 2 2.L •�� X70 1F[) ; °'S 01-4402-205 601143 77r+c` !; T` o. (11— Lira-2r, ,���c62 12 7r. i i`iIf=�i {' i11 .. —4[402-2015 3.14Pr-33 20.36 370 1INIFr?;-'S, 01-4402-205 27596 ' 14.62 3707AlIF;;P 1 i. l— 2v""5 7,,l 14 19 2 14.03 ,; ti 37 r�u _ SI- � 01-44,';4-205 6's1143 9.52 3708 (j 1'.3'.F il� — ` 492752 X .52 3741 Iii;IF 01-4404-49'E 3 4853 13.26 37^ 01-440.1-205 2759--33 52. 37r✓'7 i_Iiv7� 1 5 { 37Q= i. �lF :I..�: S 1,11-4405-205 6u13.,43 9.86 370 5 tii S i? 1-4t.,}r—ai'�1: y 52 a.�6 371).j !I; IF0 C' 1—a!s7 -2ra5 3 L}"53 S10 8 7jl'i�rt7 j t11.e(yyt�jr�-2ri� ??7�j{�,31 1�el? 3707 1 1.. A 6_�L 3� �i �� �rti G PS 7 '1 7' �}/' f��� 1 1 3; 44 2 �`:9 e`50 '707 T F�-S r' �CF t l-'�i4 �1-211 6: 11= 2: 2'.5i� 59ssg 244, 4 OH II, T'<ACT CCS: PL)TEY PR?CSI ;.z~01-2710-000 07 2061 1600.00 P2103 1600 . 00 36 9 01-9110-203 25.76 P2099 23.76 369 ,i'U L Y rr11; 'aL. P ., ,. :T {j1-27, a �—Ot'3 j/K1 461?.149 P2099 4612.4 70 T. 5 ,�,:, +L ®r5`�- 11��—' r. /s,' I-v�ltJu-•?? 17 .37 9. 909 17.37 ATASCjDEF!) 10 47/31 /81 DEPT OF TECH SERVICES 3709 wEED ATAT".= ENT COMPUTER SOI-4212-249 7/31 79.76 3709 CUANUNICATIQV SERVICES 05-4401-002 7/81 21 . 65 3709 r;GN,UNICATIOn SERVICES A-4401-002 7/d1 87, 40 5910 189 v3 RADIOLOGICAL_ 3 c „�,ADV 'CL-?OOL 001-°4202-236 254.00 p2111 254.00 SUPER SEVEN GASOLIW--.: 3709 GASULI E 901-514-1270 6/ 101-4201-219 155. 79 5911 185.713 CITY OF SPY LUIS 001SX-2 3709 MER H;.iU .SAN SERVICES DTRO1-4201^209. 7181 3.50 5912 3.50 ~ 3709 P.D. MEDICAL SERVICES 01-4201-003 036660 3x, 00 5913 38.00) TAYLOR >>r:KT L C _&TEP 3709 DENTAL R CONPACTOP 01-2710-000 12469 38. 00 5914 38.08 TARA CONSTRUCTIM! 3709 PROGRESS PAY ENT R5 ;ENOt OI-271'J-000 81-02 3175.50 5915 3175.51; THE TxLK 5HOP 3709 I Tz°LL. I ': KG CORD C"7'-"PUTT U 1-2 E 10-000 33 35. 00 5916 35, 101) TRIPLE W „PPi, IA CE 3709 '?r.CW;_0 E;ERSOA NIP s.CE`DOI-4301-301 0 001 390. 08- 3709 CARRIER 114 CONDITIONER 01-4301-301 11000 530 . 00 5917 139.92 Un E M T TFAR LA OR QTU .4i. S l .T '7 3709 7'"'.. :6 .iCRIP1" "Lob Dl�ST jV1-4 2 4 n 9 -3. V�% �,�0 -23 7/x1 �. 7 5 18 3709 .W" ALT 4Q?000 1 /2" 01-271 ;-f1Q0 PR1072 191 . 12 ! ! T ' CA :Ri) 1 -012 07/31/8 3715 1;�r'j LT ,,it ..�71 ;-,�?'Et) p��10 159.42 `3919 379.5 *3E90 !_4�-T4' i:T ,`5T�'l.1CT 'p - t L t'7-'a1 �.' ? 1i>3 nFr T, i-`PCiDUC'Tc I. C 3713 TA_ L T R-11 AL5 J1- '710-0 00 22%71 ;00 .3c 3713 " 1)2-21 1-. 221 5. 5 3710 ,'DFj' 1C.`- GUP?L1El t.'1-9102-222 a(+ii �l. 1oC5 3710 ^T� 'FF rt C' S!iP-L I 2P«'yx 3 !-1 3711 STi,Cse.-C�FFrCc c 1pvlIc.S ��1 u1 �;2..2�'�' 2?7J`i 3. r) 2 7711 STC{C -f.F ICE S IP 01-4102-222 2257 S 5.95 3712 8T i(: ;.� FFI -.r" c ddPPLI_5 01 141Qca-222 226514{ f ' ;�+ 3712 `iT:,t ;ri TC SUP�t_J.�.4 . 3713 gTr f F IC 6uP - ''F r FL. 1, 011 x: 102-R2;? 2^7:;6 10.41) 3713 SLi�PLIrti 1,;. �;,,p�t:Y55 01-41E)6-21 ) 2a,31r, 24.4 ; 3713 ,:F 371 C. S TOC 4".FFICF S�)~PLIP 01-4106-222 206 1 .75 3711) ;T+. C F p T I- L Jr_'Ct 92 2. (T6 3711 STiT5 -C;FFT_CE St;PP,l I: t'1-4jtjc}-2w _ 227C`5 1 .?+1 3711 STC C'.-�iFFIC- Si1PRL1 S 01-4106-222 22575 ,5 7 3712 ST: f t 0FF1rF Siij: a1_I 4 2.90 3712 ST, C.{.- ?1-4106r222 4 :r 4 3713 ST'IC � FP.PLIl.:S 01-4106-22a 227 S *2 3714 . T' ( ��..i?F 4 I r i? y �s i - �.'_ l.'i'�.'L 1y'�.? 01-4110-222 ?t�`+�1 3711' T,_,C,;<;. nPFI�� �� L75V 01-411G-222 2S? �?< c;.q, 3711 —)TOCK—OFFICE ` Uppl_IF_- r?ir411'I-222 22711; 7 ,85 3711 STFFIC'E' S()FPLy S 0i-all 0-222 22575 15.u , 371 ' S'T :'C {--4r-'FICA 4UPPLIEES 01-4110--222 226 6 12 59 371 c: ,:T ')CX 6FFIC fF tiJPPLlE S 01-J+110-P22 22it k 114 1 � 371: ST 'Ce4-,jFI--T!" ippL1r:3 01-41. 11;-?22 2c7',. 27 .07 3710 ,Tt C {- +rFTCE JPPL TEI� O1r4201 -222 2+x:;51 .75 371C' T + JFFTL� _;Jb"i_IF3 til-'42 1-222 a�°z 1C.3 3711 _ T'„ 37 4 '=FF"IrF Ct.�r'r! T _� ')9.—�4�'iii-r?�'. 22 /"5 9.0:"� 111 3T�'C -i;FTI+-^ ,ijF'P! IC:S i'1-4.�� 1-2a:.'.2 2P575 17.3�.t 37 t- T :i ..iP01 ?%:�56 1iia . - 31712 T t ;{- )F�7.C_ <;0; ,'i :testi t?1 -a2,'1-?2? 2a 20 3 3715 + T; C -_ r � :[C'c 31q23 X71 ') ST'?i �( �'CL �._ t �__iE t>? »2�c?-2?c rig; 51 1 ()0 3711 S1 — . F T .. E,5 i 1—Ur 02-222 2 9 2 75 1 4T F�IC � 37]. t 1rr. 2 ; a-?r? 2?7t 3 _2 urr;5c : K , N 2.-012 07/31/81 3711 STOCK-OFFICE SUPPLIES G1-4202-222 22375 4,76 3712 3MCK- 'F ICE SUPOLIr S 01-4202-222 22656 3.87 3712 TDCA-OFFICE SUPP►_TE S 01-4202-222 22463 5.513 3713 STOCK-OFFICE 3UPPLI S 01-4202-222 22706 3.33 371i1 STM-OFFICE SUPPLIES 01. 4401-222 20851 1 .87 3711 STM-OFFICE SUPPLIES 01 .-4401-222 22093 5. 15 3711 3MCK-O FICE Si PPL_ ES 01-4401-222 22705 4.53 371. ST"C;, OFFICE. SUPPLIES 01-4401•-222 22575 6.9? 012 MV-OFFICE SOPPLIES 01,4401-222 22656 7 .26 3712 1 ( X- FrlL.''•. SUPPLIES 51-4401-222 22465 10 ,47 3713 :TOCK FPICE &UPP 4� 71 -(l. ._ � LIQ_., u1,--1 E_1-222 %2706 15.62 3710 STOCK-OFFICE SUP LIFS 07-4196-?22 2051 , 62 3711 STOCK-OVICF SUPPLIES 07-4103-222 22.;93 1 .72 3711. STM-OFFICE iUPPLI`TS 07-4101-222 22705 1. .52 3712 STOCK-OFFICE SUPPLIES 07-4115 .222 2.2575 2.97 3712 STOCK- PICC SUPPLIES 07-0108-222 22656 2.43 3713 STOCK-OFFICE 5UPPLIES 07-4108-222 22468 3.48 3713 9TOCK-C F, IC,_ __ z:L;eFLIE07-4101-222 22706 5,2 3710 I;t:LCWT'v" 07-4106-312 22447 i23.97 5920 719.24 3709 7AR ALLVANC AUGUST 01-4102-2041 8/61 150 . 00 5921 150.00 ATL--AR DISMAL CO INC 3710 TRASH COLLECT TO 7/21 /01 U1-M4-231 131 142. 00 3710 THSH COLLECT TO 7/21/81 G1-Q405-231 132 &0 .50 5322 la2,5C Ja; ._S WAKEFIELD 3699 RE143 VP SANTA MB 13. 05 L=2101 13.0 6/7-01-4201-231 5 - WILLIAMS HOUSE ^r -CA, PPETS 3709 C PP _TIM - KLIG PENOV 01-2710-0000 2563 3132.08 5923 3132. 06 THE RIAM AFFA13 3710 lIhOGY .'_,LIADE - -L;_G Rc-,OOI-2719-000 31-9 2413,62 5924 2413,62 3691 QAV „70 GY , .` ILL I ^' 01-3400-030 62197 35.00 PM6 35.00 AT A SC;;DER 1 ra..G1> O7131lF1 .3:,9° ,AIS ;:,� ;; Y , i�`i '�" (jl-3�t,3J-t?3C+ '4x279 70.90 t2096 7u G °t)nc�,?I ":F it,STi4rS� P 4CTTCF 3701 -SUoSC?1I T F.; FI PFEL 4T 5ULL.C1-41G2-234 9-1.859,11 -6.34 59 2C X11 37'1 .._� I r K TT 35A0 A-�tORGA'31 3200-030 623 2 G0 3701 F !I :Q pF;:;4'jT 35. 0 A;:nR r 1 . t� � �V1 -3. 0.�-040 X23 l 0 .3701 EI gill FE- -IT 35)1) A°':ORil,A01-3-200-1 C,0 623 7(). 00 37,01 ihF ! ,1 R`,'IT 3`.0 A O'�GA01-36()C-030 623 20.00 592£ 103.(3 { C .LIF:?R ''IA C0 r,C+s' 'CRK.9 3702 I TRt?CK 1•3 °ILLS9S 01-0301-2-76 071081 1T' 3 59?7 159 .0: LILLI : AV13 37'.)x'. «Fi:;•;i% I P•IITT 4265 Sfi TA 01-3x00-020 3.t 11r�.GC 570,2 E ');,4 11.) P AlTT i-2 SC 8 01-3 Le'.l 37 T'''C 'ir�:a�''Li �-'.. ? t 2'>5 JANTF; 01-3f_'!)0"04I+ 4'xl,{ �Is�..a'3 37132 Ei .`..t; F, < y:.T_T ?,2o5 SA�V- T'!A Ol-3600-1(10 434 1 .74 592-8 172.07 37,)z 1 Y: ,;;CAll'?F 4;U .SCRIP=T 01"P-02-234 7/81 1it .97 5929 114.97 IGr'A I'!ST !. 'f ., Al'LICR S EARC 3704 VDAL CL-101-4401-209 lU.('3 5930 19.0-- 8 1 X 9.03SIX !-L G i C r%(jtj„TAIi:' 3700 36 TICK,�T,; i'in �3R!"'.'T T;RIP(?7-4103-000 7{)6;! 322.20 5931 322.20 3713 ?E F T .; r (tui, tr . r tLIF 07-,46o 2-010 125927000 5932 27 .00 371 x 4Rur?ICG7-3ryr'-t?1G 1w' 16 l ;). n"i 59:3 10000 - 2 8 • A A SC AD F 1 02.012 07/31/61 ;713 REMD _ SCWPEDER _ 5 DA07-3602 -C;lo 059 12,00 5934 12.00 014 REF:JK0 - MOODY - n DA '4CE. 07-3602-010 860 12.00 5935 12.00 FRA ;CIA NAHIEUSE.,, ;71-! E!UNO - NIC L IF - AEP 7-3602-010 1052 10 .00 5936 10.00 MELANIE KARP 714 REFUN5 - 4`.ARP -- AER03ICS 07-3602-010 1053 10, 00 5937 10.00 MAI A I LOP `.c7 1714 REFUND _ t F IER - IQUA, C407- 36OR-010 1339 3.25 5939 3.25 PETER ILTIS ;714 EFuNo - 1019 - TRIP 07-3602-010 1 117 220. 00 5939 220 .00 �fi •3t�+dry Y � Si'��.1TM 'T U REFUND - 5ATTH - VEGAS TR07-3602-010 1118 110. 00 5940 110 .00 .` HANLM 014 REFUNO - oAHLON - PLAYGRO07-3602- 010 1490 40.00 5941 40 .00 JOAK C,`4YSW ,7,:14 '<QU 0 -- GR YSOO VOCAL 07-3602-010 1209 15. 00 5942 15.00 0 T 'i EL:A.EI'. :714 �rE:t o ,r - . tiL'SON .- VOCAL 07-3602-010 1511 15. 0 5943 15.00 BONNIE joss 014 PERAD T PnSS - '.- AL 07-360:2-010 1530 30 . 00 5944 30.00 1 _—.0 12 07/31/6 L 07—`i U i 371 CA h 2—ul + 1 17 13. �u 59=45 J' . T Fr4;_c'TI 3714 ' _, ;J: TT — Vi, C L Q7—<<,I}rJ_011 X1.2 ati' 00 5946 la 3714 %EP= y;) 0 .. VOCAL 07-3602-01 4o 15. 00 5947 15.0 C A L V I _-a_?I )Ar, 3714 EF!j. 0 — �-°E~IDG — VOCAL07-36:}=?-01 � 11 15. ( c 594 15 .r1. ° C 7 I p 371 :Ery,;;,_, — r '.'ZTF — Of:C (16, 07 360 01 Q 1 L'96 30. 00 0 5949 30. 0 3715 qEP I;;jL, — ''TLLr'� — � OA�'`C�v7@:3602—C� 1. 12 1 12.00 59`+'? 12.0 3715", ST!_! ^T — AEROE4ICr17-3602-010 793 15.00 5951 15.0 C? 1 r,;A ! U 15,r 1_I. 3715 EFiji;r — LIIIWIZ LI,�, — KAPAT 7-36;02-010 121'.? 171 595 15. 0 371 -'EFL; ;i) Y n`t 4 ., TFN-,j(;7-3l-'02-01 121'-) 15. 0'; 5953 15x0' 3771.5 E I' — PAA 5 .. V(---GA.3z 17 .ryni`.�..0 1 '! � 11 c L Gr�; .� —� i � 1 . l 110 .`? 59.:4 110 . 0' 3715 FF ,.cN ;�•.t � 3St1 : — 'QAC <rc)7-3=-012-01 0 1016 10 .00 59Ii10.0 . T 16 %QI2 07/31 /81 715 E`_ _ ,li;r — : Z Yt — ;i7y 7 ,50 5956 7 .5t? J(*H;,l 5TF..'J�� ;�t.,i�! 715 iEFLF:;f— rLAy07-3C-0P,—101��3 10.00 5957 19 ,00 715 rr,;°:r _� us l?i.n — ARTS x.07-3602-010 1279 5.100 5958 S,Off 71c F,�,, ` — CPr — r.r i? s X17-3t02—tilt' 121 : 30 .O0 5959 39.00" Y — tPLY :x:707-3 6 QP--C10 117,E 596 ' 20 . 00 715 :F ; +.t�;i 1L!_?„ — (?L:1YC t {;7-36OP—+iii= Icir0 46 . 00 5961 40 .00 6 �a V 'i�_� "1i it t _�� _i'-.. — li � �.^,:J rJ7-.5002-01x0 �,'.;:6 44a00 P2102 44. 0.0 999 NET PAYROLL July 1, 1981 5403-5472 33555. 82 999 NET PAYROLL July 15, 1981 5606-5709 35745.26 999 NET PAYROLL July 29, 1981 5790-5863 40831. 71 .31 _ r AT 07/31/ RITT 0 31162 . 86 PREP q I!? 156282 . 47 -0— TOTAL 187444 . 88 PRE-PAID WRITTEN FUND ol 149017 . 03 25404 . 01 FUND 05 1458.2^ 3249. 99 FUPD n7 SS07 . 15 2508 . 86 __ -3,:2 C • PERSONNEL TRANSACTIONS July, 1981 Appointments: Nelson, Kimberly - Maintenance Worker I/ -Eff 7-28-81 Parks--Public Works Department Status: Probationary McDowell , Bonnie - Police -Eff. 7-6-81 Officer Trainee--Police Department Status: Provisional Cooper, Brian - Lifeguard -Eff. 7-7-81 Recreation Department Status: Temporary Jennison, Amy - Lifeguard -Eff. 7-4-81 Recreation Department Status: Temporary Johnson, Debby Lynn - Lifeguard -Eff. 7-2-81 Recreation Department Status: Temporary Potter, Suzanne - Lifeguard -Eff. 7-10-81 Recreation Department Status: Temporary Resignations: Sylvia, Donald Fire Chief Fire Department -Eff. 8-14-81 Other: 1. Thirty Police Officer applications were received and forwarded to the Police Chief for screening. (Advertising was done in June and deadline extended throughout July. ) Ten applicants were selected for oral interviews which are now in progress. 2. One hundred and twenty-two Maintenance Worker I/Parks applica- tions were received and forwarded to the Director of Public Works for screening. Oral interviews were scheduled for ten candidates on 7-17-81. The #1 candidate was hired, effective July 28 , 1981. 3. A written test for Dispatcher Clerk was held on July 17, 1981. Sixty applicants; 38 showed for testing. Fourteen applicants passed the examination and were put on an eligibility list. 4 . Advertised for 18-month Contract Associate Planner position. Thirty-seven applications were received and forwarded to the Planning Director for screening. /ms 7/30/81 i p� . M E M O R A N D U M TO: CITY MANAGER August 4, 1981 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: Acceptance of Parcel Map AT 80--95 LOCATION: 10755 Vista Road (Lot 40 , Block 40) APPLICANT: Glen Lewis (Stewart) On November 10, 1980 the City Council approved Tentative Parcel Map AT 80-95 allowing creation of two lots of 5.0 acres each subject to certain conditions and in concurrence with the recom- mendation of the Planning Commission. The zoning is A-1-B-V-5 and the General Plan designation is Subur- ban Single Family Residential. Staff review has determined that all conditions of ;approval have been met. On August 3 , 1981 the Planning Commission reviewed the • Parcel Map on its Consent Calendar and recommends acceptance. LAWRENCE STEVENSM RAY WARDEN Planning Director C ty _anager • qt ac . '44. I � q W 444 • 03 4k u � ? � � � --- Cwiy)F o•�os �Y�,f i,�s.soi✓ "'„�. 41 F 2LC 'A � � 2 ! 1 kl 4 o R Z O � ? � W / ` H W OR 3 S F • _.-__..�..d�cv ,..n,.:.r.,,�.�ve.,, 7...-.��,,.,»pw..., „r :.:�•s ��,v;� fig-`�,.,�-�`r��*,Yt.:zc't"A"��"�K o..'°'ta �r Y�d'��< z,,,sf F�.k�•r.-ter `� 4 M E M O R A N D-- U M TO: CITY MANAGER August 4 , 1981 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT; ACCEPTANCE OF PARCEL MAP AT 810327 :1 LOCATION: 9600 , 9630 Carmelita (Lot 14A & 15A, Block 31) APPLICANT: Edward Anderson (Twin Cities Engineering) On June 8 , 1981 the City Council approved Tentative Parcel Map AT 810327 : 1 allowing creation of three lots of 2 . 5 2 . 5, and 2 .7 acres each subject to certain conditions and in concurrence with the recommendation of the Planning Commission. The zoning is A-1-1z and the General Plan designation is Suburban Single Family Residential. Staff review has determined that all conditions of approval have been met. On August 3 , 1981 the Planning Commission reviewed • the Parcel Map on its Consent Calendar and recommends its acceptance. LAWRENCE STEVENS R L. WARDEN Planning Director City Manager • /Ps NOTE LEGEND a sa ��a Baa Gropt,.c Sco/e:n feet ,7 u17p/01127ble easefnen/s 0 /ndicafes SCI //2'febar yfifh describedtoroocrty. Cop marked PCC 20244"wtfh 117elal9a671'dagsl a/or�gsidc. 111411e U.E.r 2 • /r�dfcafes fo�rld/'/.P. P.uE. r 3/f/C/QOA u�/ess sftawa off��u�ise. GP) h7diC4llcS record per 3/f!e/yr09 - zf� , -3/'R -- -- k,- 206.38' -; ••., � PARCEL 3 .� 2.5/ floes Grass ". � N N �•N o 2.7/Acres G'mss h 2.5/Acres Ivef Im PARCEL 2 �oo / -\2.51 Acres Grass p -- _245Acres def .t/SS• ' t� Orgrioye Swo/e -- y 06 ' N ,t/46°36 3/'E• .6.22'-_=: '•.0 Fr:- S51 58' 10 57263' so, 4V6/°D0 00{Y8D8.40' BEAR/NGS NOTE ;, osis o beorirrgs Used for fhis Ho n�c�rroy U11//be al/owed AflhlCh exceeds 20',f- sfooe. 0 ac is /he souther/y fine o/%f /f OaCrage s/ope exceeds I2/„ctwedirnprr>�crr�crtf wou/o'be a as shor/i?0r7 3//1ey40fl YG/°00'W egairerer�f of fhc fir»c afOo/icafiar�forad9Grrfr�:f Pr / P cr: /9r a//wca>hcr sarfoce wi//Ge r<cqu�ied sirrlifo�/y fora//sf�zs S� ref exceeding /2�'. The private driveway shay/be irrloioved fo a ml1w v4,177 wldlh Nc o/(wefve feel Wi/h an ur�absfiaefed vcrfical e�oror�ce o�. G fecl P 0/ V1 1 M E M O R A N D U M TO: CITY MANAGER August 4 , 1981 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF PARCEL MAP AT 810107 :1 LOCATION: 9100 El Camino Real (Ptn. Lot 6 , Block 10) APPLICANT: Donald Messer (Hilliard) On March 9 , 1981 the City Council approved Tentative Parcel Map AT 810107 :1 allowing creation of two lots of 0 .48 and 0 . 49 acres each subject to certain conditions and in concurrence with the recommendation of the Planning Commission. The zoning is M-1-D and the General Plan designation is Industrial Park. Staff review has determined that all conditions of ,approval have been met. On August 3, 1981 the Planning Commission reviewed the Parcel Map on its Consent Calendar and recommends its acceptance. • rx� LAWRENCE STEVENS MU RAY WARDEN Planning Director City anager • 3 4 �- �i`� - esu E.v kriE.v �. ArAscAt�"fA■y,�.r 71, P ° Sir6 50 2��E'tG,vTs .Pidyfs �, c D As 6JEceE P r<i rwc ..ve. P,ek'.E 298 J. Ec cw...o.e�.c �° J ��•9n.E,asei�C,.vr n .+nosca�c'e � R.ee�q�sE,s As tor., .E'EGc�.E''LiS. No Scar,E .-.. 9 AZ.Fi /VQ.y 4 � BZ \ />AID T.hm � 3Z 'i 5 Gdrvawr 31,26 LS.. e oil trkA F.vo. 44o"/R.atc. 6923 PIR ' •.� Q� �h a o P� 3 G e� 0- a Five.she' � Z3. � � L_S. 3976E Q P�t�l Fi , A� 9y23.��G� `3� ` ,I AB�� L.EGc �°� 9' ¢9'ASO! Foy' tj 7 P�Ao �� Z 517vy�� Az �PEF e= C-17 e.3---S,-17 +d ai 6'9B"E� ��ii.G T.v6 L/.vE .Oi viO/niG G/i � OF Co 77-3'7 F.�y THE SOtIrHEASTEEYY nU'�/j'� GOT Gs A3 ".srOc..w Oiv 3BGS.S'� (.P) //(d�Y a> rivPF_..,.in 'rirF 14 ._. '�"'._....'..,..*•+�. 1._.._.�?-.-.:_` .,.'_t_ "=F:Su".+r�.e<-sreacs-a..,., -- r • M_E M^O,R A N_D_U M_; TO: CITY MANAGER August 4 , 1981 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP AT 810420 :1 LOCATION: Santa Lucia, Cencerro, and San Lucas Roads APPLICANT: Tenneco West (Twin Cities Engineering) REQUEST: To realign portions of Santa Lucia and Cencerro roads and to adjust certain lot. lines resulting from said road alignment On July 20, 1981 the Planning Commission conducted ''a public hearing on the above-referenced matter unanimously (with Commissioner Wentzel and Chairman Moore absent) adopting Findings 1-2 , adopting a Conditional Negative Declaration and approving the resubdivision subject to Conditions 1-16 , as listed in the attached Staff Report, with the following to be added to Conditions 2 and 3 : • ''a. Installation of water lines (#2) /utilities (#3) may be deferred to allow installation in con- junction with road improvements . " There was discussion among the Planning Commission concerning the realignment of Cencerro, concerning the road names , concerning the timing of various improvements, and concerning the extension of available utilities (electric, telephone) . Jerry Ladd, representing Tenneco West, and Allen Campbell, appli- cant' s engineer, indicated concurrence with the recommended conditions except for Conditions #2 and #3 . Concerning Condition #2 (which required water operable facilities prior to filing the Final Map) , the applicant requested that construction be allowed to be deferred to the same time as road construction with appro- priate performance guarantees. The applicant requested deletion of Condition #3 (which required utility extension prior to filing the Final Map) on the basis that it would be a financial hardship on the applicant since other developers are not required to do so and on the basis that it was not a reasonable requirement if the number of lots was the same. No one else appeared on the matter. After a subsequent meeting with Staff and additional correspondence, • the applicant has indicated that Condition #3 as revised is acceptable. 4`2w� zhwwa - Ag� LAWRENCE STEVENSU VanLger WARDEN Planning Director City r P.Fr FF „ ,� CITY OF ATASCADERO r r �I"°''"m • 1918 ' � r' "n (I, 1979 Planning Department July 20, 1981 -STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: Tentative Parcel Map AT 810420 :1 LOCATION: Santa Lucia, Cencerro and San Lucas Roads APPLICANT Tenneco West/Development Corporation (Jerry Ladd/ Richard Edwards) REQUEST: To realign portions of Santa Lucia and Cencerro roads and to adjust certain lot lines resulting from said road realignment BACKGROUND 1. Existing Zoning: A-1-B-V-5 2. General Plan: Suburban Single Family Residential 3 . Environmental Determination: An initial study environmental • description form has been completed. The Planning Director has prepared a Conditional Negative Declaration indicating the project will not have a significant adverse effect upon the environment if certain mitigating measures are incorporated into the project. 4. Site Description: The site is currently undeveloped and is traversable via several jeep trails which generally follow the alignment of Santa Lucia and Cencerro Roads as they appear on the Colony maps . Another jeep trail generally follows the proposed realignment portion of Cencerro Road connecting to Santa Lucia Road. The subject property has gently rolling to rugged terrain and is laced with drainage swales primarily on the east facing slopes which drain to Graves Creek. A pond also exists in the southerly portion of the property in the existing Lot 14 of Block 57 (off Cencerro Road). The property is a portion of a 6300+ acre ranch which is operated for cattle grazing purposes. 5. Project Description: In an effort to develop and sell 31 lots of record, the applicant desires to extend and construct Santa Lucia Road, a portion of San Lucas Road and realign a portion of Cencerro Road to connect San Lucas and Santa Lucia Roads . The applicant is also, requesting lot line adjustments for certain lots affected by the proposed realignment. Lot lines of twelve out of the 31 lots would be affected by the road realignments. The purpose of the realignments is so that the roads can be installed to more closely follow the topo- graphy and to eliminate a crossing over Graves Creek. Access via Santa Lucia Road extension is also being provided to the • Page Two Re: Tentative Parcel Map AT 810420 :1 (Tenneco West) July 20 , 1981 6168+ acre Rancho Asuncion, just outside the City limits. The applicant has indicated that abl roads installed would be built to City standards and dedicated. City water and other utilities will also be extended and available to all 31 lots. The following chart summzrizes the lot size changes resulting from the road realignments : BLOCK 85 Existing Proposed Lot Acreage Acreage -Loss +Gain 13 6 . 15 5 .12 -1. 03 14 5 .13 4 . 37 -0 . 75 15 5. 58 3 . 5 -2 . 08 16 4 . 07 7 . 28 +3 . 21 17 2 . 01 3 . 10 +1 . 09 29 2 . 14 5 . 52 +3 . 38 • 30 6 . 28 4 . 50 -1 . 78 (-5 . 64) (+7 . 68) BLOCK 57 Existing Proposed Lot Acreage Acreage -Loss +Gain 13 4 . 0 4 . 0 0 0 14 2 . 7 3 . 0 +0 . 3 15 3 . 29 2 . 5 -0 . 79 16 3 . 0 3 . 0 0 0 17 4 . 85 3 . 3 -1 . 55 (-2; 34) (+0 .3) TOTAL LOSS/GAIN: (-7 . 98) (+7 . 98) STAFF COMMENTS On Thursday, June 4, 1981 the Subdivision Review Board met to discuss this project with the applicant, Tenneco West and the applicant' s engineer, Allen Campbell of Twin Cities Engineering. In ,attendance at the meeting were : Mary Beatie , Associate Plan- ner; John Kennaly, Assistant Civil Engineer; Don Sylvia, Fire Chief; and Bob Lilley, Planning Commissioner. The following items were discussed: Page Three • Re: Tentative Parcel Map AT 810420:1 (Tenneco West) July 20, 1981 a) Show overhead power line and other easements of record. b) Water lines to be extended to all lots . c) Submit preliminary soils report at time of Final Map. d) Install all roads to City standards and dedicate. e) Fire hydrants to be installed along all roads in specific locations acceptable to the Fire Department and Atascadero Mutual Water Company. f) Recommendation for Conditional Negative Declaration concerning: - grading - tree removal - drainage - water storage/line extension fire hazard - septic suitability Prior to the submittal of their tentative map, the applicants and their engineer met with City Staff on several occasions to discuss City requirements and Public Works requirements related to road • improvements. In discussions with Staff, it was determined that a maximum grade of 15% should be used in designing the project ' s roads , It was also agreed that Santa Lucia Road would be desig- nated a collector road requiring a 25 ' wide paved section with 3 ' of graded shoulder on each side. Cencerro and San Lucas Roads would require a 22 ' width and a 3 ' earth shoulder on each side of the paving. Where adjoining owners do not join in on the road construction, Tenneco would be required to have 16 ' section with a 3 ' earth shoulder on each side of the paving. Drainage facili- ties such as culverts, inlets, etc. would be required when necessary. It should be understood that the project is a resubdivision to facilitate improved lot design in conjunction with realignment of roads. The number of lots within the total projects is not being increased. Conditions established apply only to the re- vised lots and not the entire project, although, on a practical basis, some will be applied equally to each. Others will likely be applied to the remainder of the development (and the City in general) with the upcoming adoption of City ordinances . ) FINDINGS 1. The application as presented together with recommended condi- tions for approval will not have a significant effect upon the environment if certain mitigation measures are introduced and the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report is not necessary. J • Page Four Re: Tentative Parcel Map AT 810420:1 (Tenneco West) July 20, 1981 2. The land division as recommended conforms to the applicable zoning regulations and is consistent with the 1980 Atascadero General Plan. - RECOMMENDATION Based upon the above findings, the Planning Department recommends : A) Issuance of a Conditional Negative Declaration as follows : 1 . That provision be made to reduce fire hazard at the site. 2 . Adequate provision be made for drainage and erosion control and protection in conjunction with site development. 3 . That grading and tree removal be minimized during all phases of site and road development. 4 . That provision be made for adequate access to each building • site including provision for improvements and slope protection. 5. That adequate and sufficient tests be performed on each lot to ensure septic suitability at each building site; and B) Approval of the Tentative Parcel Map AT 810420: 1 subject to the following conditions : 1 . Private sewage disposal systems will be an acceptable method of sewage disposal, if reports , tests, and design are acceptable. All tests, reports and designs shall conform to methods and guidelines prescribed by the Manual of Septic Tank Practice and other applicable City ordinances . The following shall appear as a Note on the Final Map: "Appropriate soils reports including a percolation test, a test to determine the presence of ground water, and a log of a soil boring to a minimum depth of ten (10) feet shall be submitted to the Atascadero Planning Department prior to the issuance of a building permit on each lot. Where soils reports indicate the conventional soil ab- sorption systems are not acceptable, City approval of plans for an alternative private sewage disposal system, • designed by a Registered Civil Engineer, shall be required. Depending upon the system, more restrictive requirements may be imposed. " Page Five • Re : Tentative Parcel Map AT 810420 : 1 (Tenneco West) July 20 , 1981 2 . Water shall be obtained from the Atascadero Mutual Water Company and water operable facilities shall exist at the frontage of all parcels prior to filing of the Final Map. 3 . Other utilities available to the area shall be extended to the front of each parcel prior to recordation of the Final Map. Any utility easements are to be shown on the Final Map. 4 . The applicant shall construct Santa Lucia, Cencerro, and San Lucas Roads along the frontage of the property being the subject of this parcel map to City standards providing as follows : a) A 25 foot paved section along Santa Lucia. b) A 22 foot paved section along Cencerro and San Lucas Roads. c) A partial paved width of 14 feet on all roads where the applicant only owns property on sone side. d) Three feet of graded shoulder on each side of paving, . 5 . Improvements to be constructed under an inspection agree- ment and encroachment permit issued by the Public Works Department. a) Improvement drawings, including improvements to control drainage and erosion within the road right-of-way, shall be submitted to the Public Works Department for review and approval prior to recordation of the Final Map. b) The applicant may enter into an agreement to defer installation of Santa Lucia, Cencerro and San Lucas Roads for a period not to exceed three years . Any such agreement shall include a bond, certificate of deposit or similar improvement guarantee acceptable to the Public Works Director. 6 . The subject roads shall be formally offered for dedication by the actual easement owners. A title report together with legal descriptions for the roads shall accompany the offers of dedication prior to recordation of the Final Map. (Note: portions of proposed road improvements are outside the scope of this parcel map but it is the applicant ' s • intention to construct all roads in the 31 lot project in compliance with the foregoing. ) • Page Six Re : Tentative Parcel Map AT 810420 :1 (Tenneco West) July 20 , 1981 7 . Drainage and erosion control plans in conjunction with the improvement of Santa Lucia, Cencerro and San Lucas Roads shall be submitted for review and approval by the Public Works Department prior to recordation of the Final Map. a) Additional drainage and erosion control plans , also prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer, shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning and Public Works Department prior to issuance of building permits in conjunction with the installation of private driveways or driveway easements. A note to this effect shall be placed on the Final Map, 8 . Plan and profile drawings of proposed individual driveways shall be submitted for approval by the Public Works and Planning Departments in order to determine average grade and appropriate improvement requirements at the time of building permits. If average slope exceeds 12% , paved improvement would be a requirement at the time of appli- • cation for building permit. Otherwise, an all-weather surface would be required similarly. In no event will driveways be allowed which exceed 20% in slope. In the event any portion of the driveway shall be shared, im- provement of that shared portion shall be a requirement made in conjunction with the first building permit. Notes to these effects shall appear on the Final Map. 9 . With s regard to improvement standards for the driveways, g P Y r the following note shall appear on the Final Map : t "Private driveways shall be improved to a minimum width of twelve (12) feet with an unobstructed vertical clear- ance of fourteen (14) feet. " 10 . Effort shall be made to minimize grading that would be disruptive to the natural topography and removal of existing , mature trees. The following shall appear as a note on the Final Map : "No trees shall be removed without compliance with applicable City ordinances. No grading shall commence without an appropriate permit and compliance with applicable City ordinances . " • Page Seven Re: Tentative Parcel Map AT 810420 :1 (Tenneco West) • July 20 , 1981 11. The applicant shall instal a minimum of five fire pp 1 u hydrants generally in the following locations : - On Santa Lucia Road at the southeasterly corner of Lot 18 , Block 85 - On Santa Lucia Road at the southeasterly corner of Lot 15 , Block 85 - On the unnamed road at the intersection of Lots 16 , 17 and 30 - At the intersection of Cencerro Road with the unnamed road at Lots 30 and 29 , Block 85 and Lots 14 and 13 , Block 57 - At the intersection of San Lucas Road with the unnamed road at Lot 16 , Block 57 The size, type, manner of installation and specific loca- tion of hydrants will be as required by the Fire Chief pending review of road improvement plans .. A letter from the Fire Chief certifying the installation of required . fire hydrants shall be submitted to the Planning Department prior to recordation of the Final Map, unless road improve- ments are deferred per Condition Number 4-c contained herein in which case the letter shall be submitted prior to final inspection and acceptance of the roads. (Note: portions of the development are outside the scope of this parcel map, but several additional hydrants in compliance with the foregoing will be required by the Fire Chief as part of the approval of road improvement plans . ) 12 . The applicant shall obtain approval of a road name for the realigned road subject to the following requirements prior to the recordation of the Final Map (approved road name shall appear on the Final Map) . a) All road names shall be of Spanish origin or shall be the names of non-living persons of historical importance . b) Road names shall not be duplicative of nor similar to other road names within the City of Atascadero or in the nearby unincorporated areas of San Luis Obispo County. • • Page Eight Re: Tentative Parcel Map AT 810420 :1 (Tenneco West) July 20 , 1981 13 . All pipeline and other easements of record shall be shown on the Final Map. A letter shall be submitted from each utility company indicating the nature and extent of any building restrictions. A note so stating such restrictions shall appear on the Final Map . 14 . Roof materials for all structures shall be Class C rating or better and a note to that effect shall appear on the Final Map. 15 . - A Final Parcel Map in compliance with all conditions set forth herein shall be submitted for review and approval in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City Lot Division Ordinance prior to recordation. a) Monuments shall be set at all new property corners created and a Registered Civil Engineer or licensed land surveyor shall submit a letter certifying that the monuments have been set prior to recordation. • b) A Final title policy (CLIA or ALTA) shall be submitted for review in conjunction with the processing of the Final Map. 16 . Approval of this Tentative Parcel Map shall expire one year from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted pursuant to a written request prior to the expiration date. ACTION The Planning Commission should by motion direct Staff as deemed appropiate. TO APPROVE: Motion to adopt findings and set conditions . TO DENY: Motion setting findings for denial. REPORT PREPARED BY: -1. MARY E. ' EATIE Associate Planner • REPORT APPROVED BY: 10-� LAWRENCE STEVENS Planning Director /Ps 40 V v I' 9.4 ` ..` 10 / 25— 17 22 -44 2 � 98 24 18 39 —/,/ it 6"C� 9 i � `, � r / / 19 I 21 e5i 10 12 —23 1 23 38 , � 12 \ \ ; 25 � � 13 — �i 22 l II q'., 21 2 24 j37 13 - 24 -__ �+1 ,I 15\/ 20 \ 18 / 14 6 16 19 / 25 36 ) , �4' `� 19 3 Ig �' 23 i — 141 % 17 \� 26 35 40 IS 2 / 34 --- --,�� 21 ----- 19 4 S 27 16 2I,' 8 39. g / 15 33 20 3£3 4 < 17 28 32 17 ;/19 6\\ \ 3 8 1 I E 7 0 6 29 30 31 13 18 11 53 "'i 36 7 �P� 13 16 14 12 33 34 /37 g �� 15 1 1 it 6 5 10 17 3 2 / t'Y 0//C) 1 �-- 2 23 25 9 4 1 <��� 7 4 3 �P 52 2 26 2 ;I 10 \21 j 30 2t 6 j2G \ 27 I 11 it 3 ' 29 f 19 ��� 2 8 12 1 24 7 \ CQ; 26 4 25 26 / 28 g \ 18 30 \�29 Q 3 10 38 12 / 27 v i4 31 6 5 \ 7 — 33 s p 17 37/ 15 ' 9 10 11 / 33, 40 46 8 9 1 I 17 12 15 / 34\ / 10 8 16 �Z / q�Q !6 / 45 2 20 y 7 6 5 \ 36 41 47 q 35 / 13 12 0 �. Cy 44 14. 23 10 3 42 49 48 15 16 2`AJ 43 \A! 20 ^' 2 21 50 52 I, `12{ I 4 C/ ► 51 „rcC(�, I8 22 23 2 35 19 I r .� L 28 �3 4 25 26 27 36 34 33 32 31 % � __�,..••— 37 QUAD 138 N r'. 6 G i ` '�16 i 15 14 13 1 p.... 5 '4 3 2 i 17 1-- v 57° o6l1vay MA/0 7 ATS/- & 7 84 ,V�o Gc>Es7 to Q 41 LO I o In—ONp - tF 1 N d 1n N o a / N SJ G T ` S N J T p2 T N s Ti N Op cps` n' p'Si C`Il i 0 Z, M p LO I \ � � 1 s M co M DoG�S/ pC�/ t sO��i M _ \ _ M rl°ski •/ M N O ' rf) Al ®� cp u") I \ ZaNiN I 1. NNN IN 7-1 i 7 ci A ems.n.v SP� / , \ \� It Iq ArNUAMe e/%.smrr(�r.r.�c.n.nc�oaAr AS - I✓O(O,'J /J M,/S,/f&/7 Cf.VOCE Jf/f M(OA'Y./N A'/J[NInv, A�'f�1\�.,1 Rp o I�^� SAN • •`r!/ry/c!"/fYrRri.i Mll l AlAnstip S1,1N1 1,f EL 1` AP dTCQ 87 �(Kr1 C O N 4E M,.r.,:x,zo r(nr(Jr.�•nnra S+nusN Y/C/N/rY .NAP (7E, W&CO GGT nnv n/IrJ rfa+rEliHs /r✓tf r'V'Ufhxfr;I JJffJ • M_E_ M_O,R A N D U_M_ TO: CITY MANAGER August 4 , 1981 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP AT 810225 :1 LOCATION: 6600 and 6650 Alcantara (Lots 40 & 41, Block UA) APPLICANT: Dennis Moresco (Contract Survey & Design) REQUEST: To allow conversion of an existing triplex apartment into three air-space condominiums and creation of an additional eight new units as air-space condominiums with the two existing lots combined into one. On August 3, 1981 the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the above-referenced matter unanimously', adopting Findings 1-2, adopting a Conditional Negative Declaration and approving the conominium conversion/condominium project subject to Conditions 1-9 , as listed in the attached Staff', Report. . There was only brief discussion among the Planning Commission. Dennis Moresco, applicant, spoke and indicated his concurrence with the recommended conditions . Noone else appeared on the matter. LAWRENCE STEVENS MUR Y L WARDEN Planning Director City Ma ager • /Ps r n tic j6 11 Fr !� I�^� CITY OF ATASCADERO r' ^ 1s7A Planning Department August 3, 1981 • STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: Tentative Tract Map AT 810225: 1 LOCATION: 6600 & 6650 Alcantara Avenue (Lots 40 & 41, Block UA) APPLICANT: Dennis Moresco (Contract Survey & Design) REQUEST: To allow conversion of an existing triplex apartment into three air-space condominiums and creation of an additional eight new units as air-space condominiums with the two existing lots combined into one. BACKGROUND 1. Existing Zoning: R-3-B-2-D 2. General Plan: High Density Multiple Family Residential 3. Environmental Determination: An initial study environmental description form has been completed for the project. The Planning Director has prepared a Conditional Negative Decla- ration indicating the project will not have a significant adverse effect upon the environment if certain mitigation measures are incorporated into the project. 4. Site Conditions: Lot 40 is presently developed with an exist- ing triplex apartment complex. Lot 41 is presently vacant with no improvements. A major drainage way which is very densely vegetated traverses the rear approximately 45 feet of the property. Adjacent to the swale at the top of the slope bank to the north is a 15 foot wide sewer easement. The site slopes gradually down from Alcantara to the swale. Access is provided via a paved driveway off Alcantara on Lot 40. With exception of landscaping_around the building, the remainder of the lot is covered primarily with natural grasses and some heavier vegetation consisting of a variety of trees and shrubs in the swale area. City sewer and water are avail- able to the site. 5. Project Description: The applicant is proposing to combine two lots to create a one lot tract map for the purpose of converting three existing apartment units into air-space con- dominiums and also to create eight new air-space condominium units proposed for the remainder of the site (see Departmental Review) . Access to the project is proposed to be via the existing driveway onto Alcantara. No indication has been made concerning tenant assistance provisions. • Page Two Re: Tentative Tract Map AT 810225: 1 (Moresco) August 3, 1981 STAFF COMMENTS On Thursday, June 4 , 1981 the Subdivision Review Board met with Mr. Moresco, the applicant, to discuss his application. Also in attendance at that meeting were: Mary Beatie, Associate Planner; John Kennaly, Assistant Civil Engineer; Don Sylvia, Fire Chief; and Bob Lilley, Planning Commissioner. The following items were discussed at that meeting: 1. Install concrete curb,-gutter and sidewalk along Alcantara. 2. Provide 5 ' offer of dedication along Alcantara (5 ' easement to be behind sidewalk) . 3. This application is to be a one-lot tract. 4. Possible upgrading of water line. Water Company indicates this will not be the responsibility of the applicant. The Water Company will upgrade line. • 5. Applicant is responsible for providing a fire hydrant in the vicinity of the project. 6. Zoning approval requires a Departmental Review. Applicant must submit: - application form - filing fee of $150. 00 - 2 or 3 sets of site plans, floor plans and elevations (call out all dimensions and exterior materials and colors) - one set at 82" X 11" reduction of plans 7) Provide drainage, erosion and sediment control plan at time of building permit. 8) Possible future participation in area-wide drainage improvements. 9) Tract Map application will not be scheduled for Planning Com- mission until Departmental Review application is received. 10) Applicant must continue to comply with Sections 66427. 1 (c) , (d) , .and 66452. 8 of the Subdivision Map Act. 11) Discussed showing 50 and 100 year flood lines on the map. • 12) Recommend a Conditional Negative Declaration. Page Three Re: Tentative Tract Map AT 810225: 1 (Moresco) • August 3, 1981 FINDINGS 1. The application as submitted together with the recommended conditions conforms to the applicable zoning and subdivision regulations and is consistent with the 1980 Atascadero General Plan. 2. The application as submitted together with the recommended conditions will not have a significant adverse effect upon the environment and the preparation of an Environmental Im- pact Report is not necessary. RECOMMENDATION Based upon the above findings, the Planning Department recommends : A) Issuance of a Conditional Negative Declaration as follows : 1. Adequate provision shall be made for drainage, erosion and sediment control and protection in conjunction with . site development; and, B) Approval of Tentative Tract Map AT 810225: 1 subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall establish Covenants , Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) for the regulation of land use, control of nuisances and architectural control of all buildings and facilities. a. These CC&Rs shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Attorney and the Planning Department prior to approval of the Final Map. b. These CC&Rs shall be administered b_v a Condominium Homeowner' s Association. 2. The applicant shall comply with the following sections of the 1981 Subdivision Map Act for the existing triplex and for the eight proposed units should they be occupied as rentals prior to recording the Map: a. Section 66427. 1 (c) provision for 180 day written notice of intention to convert prior to termination of tenancy. • Page Four Re: Tentative Tract Map AT 810225: 1 (Moresco) August 3, 1981 b. Section 66427. 1 (d) right to purchase unit for 90 days at same or more favorable terms . C. Section 66452. 8 notice to new tenants that units are being converted. 3. Applicant shall install concrete curb, gutter, and side- walk along the Alcantara frontage of the subject property prior to approval of the Final Map (or prior to Building Permit final - reference Departmental Review R810714 : 1 - whichever occurs first) . a. A five foot offer of dedication shall be provided along the property frontage and be maintained as an easement behind the sidewalk. b. Said improvements shall be constructed under an inspec- tion agreement and encroachment permit issued by the Public Works Department. • C. Improvements may be deferred by improvement bond or similar guarantee. 4 . The applicant shall install one fire hydrant in the vicinity of the project of exact size, type location, and manner of installation specified by the Fire Chief. Said fire hydrant to be installed prior to the recorda- tion of the Final Map (or prior to Building Permit final reference Departmental Review R810714 : 1 —whichever occurs first) . The applicant shall submit to the Planning De- partment written evidence that the fire hydrant has been installed to the Fire Department's satisfaction. a. It is suggested the applicant coordinate with the Atascadero Mutual Water Company for their upgrading of the water line in Alcantara Avenue prior to in- stallation of the fire hydrant. 5. The applicant shall prepare a Final Map indicating a one lot tract, combining Lots 40 and 41. 6. The 100 year flood Line shall be shown on the Final Map. 7. That all conditions of approval herein specified are to be complied with prior to the filing of the Final Map. . 8. Approval of this Tentative Tract Map shall expire 18 months from the date of this approval unless an extension of time is granted pursuant to a written request prior to the expi- ration date. Page Five Re: Tentative Tract Map AT 810714 : 1 (Moresco) August 3, 1981 9) A Final Map in compliance with all conditions set forth herein shall be submitted for review and approval in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City Lot Division Ordinance prior to recordation. a. Monuments shall be set at all new property corners and a Registered Civil Engineer or licensed land surveyor shall submit a letter certifying that the monuments have been set prior to recordation, unless certification is received that corners are already monumented. b. A final title policy (CLTA or ALTA) shall be submitted for review in conjunction with the processing of the Final Map. ACTION The Planning Commission should by motion direct Staff as deemed appropriate. • TO APPROVE: Motion to adopt findings and set conditions . TO DENY: Motion setting findings for denial. REPORT PREPARED BY: t -9114-tELl MARY E. BEATIE Associate Planner REPORT APPROVED BY: LAWRENCE STEVENS Planning Director /Ps 4/ 5ot27EB 77o -31 5p).C_1 V� � i7 w 10-A / 2 2) 14 ate. oo a�p1 �2� 10 6 l I \ ��° ��Co �O ��/20Z:� VA 1b 16 7.1 / 9 I 23 625 h V37 61 . 19 5 5 e 28 44 (0 9 27 43 F 4 .� 5 ` Psis 28 42 G.d90 :41 4 0 ! t:.,� �Zp• •i:• ,7� b:. N b/r• 29 2 ���% 3 30 «. .� .. ®Fill- A- �. 3133 34 35 36' ,i: vts 1 l 37, z r 32 c o-437 /8 75070/•'/ , 3 l8 R77oS25y p_ \ E• 2, \5 \4 I 18 t-1�L 2 4 26 13 l3 25 z �2 26 `+� 28 � zorvliVC� M�4-P 0 '20 / ! 27 12 1 o G(po0 " �v(o5D �LGh/U7i� b 2 o , 2 °� i t z s 0I 9 G(,a- 2 � s j777 .e MORRO A`/------ Ir - L n a \�� 'O �: Com' I \+�) L� • 'r r' i;. 1 I 1---�1U- 1 12� 9 1 x tD/ v yf P•-1:'77?U yi,i I V �1 `J J, n' 32— y4 rU t •��' _ Rv 1 N s yy. D\L��4 0� � �•l 1 �• N 1 N on }.I�•. Ib^\�f \ �:? A \T9� y µNil\ _t N Y o\•o � .w` �i\ j Nt O W ,ly.• 1,f 'y_\ \ v J rr--A•f D V to , ,n• A�lr I' � r y'.ro n ry u 38. I O 1f N � • n,u ' rrI N J° ' 17 l7 � ^ nJ IN t� C, ^ tip. ca ok 8 91 C 1 ' _ f �\iyr U hl • C z N i r r 41 Ji =�vok- , t i I cl L--' J" -9 i �L \ 12 Tj LD • v j • M_E M_OTR A N_D_U_M_: TO: CITY MANAGER August 4 , 1981 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW R810714 :1 VARIANCE V810516 :1 LOCATION: 6600 & 6650 Alcantara (Lots 40 & 41, Block UA) APPLICANT: Dennis Moresco (Contract Survey & Design) REQUEST: To allow construction of eight two bedroom units and to reduce the required 25 ' front yard. On August 3 , 1981 the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the above-referenced matter and with Commissioner Summers dissenting, adopted Findings 1-8 , adopted a Conditional Negative Declaration and approved the project subject to Condi- tions 1-17 , as listed in the attached Staff Report., There was discussion among the Planning Commission concerning the • amount of grading necessary to build the project, concerning the adequacy of required off-street parking, concerning curb, gutter and sidewalk improvements and concerning the impact of traffic on surrounding residences . Dennis Moresco, applicant, spoke and indicated his ;acceptance of the recommended conditions . Mr. Elwood, Mr, Fitzsimmons, and Mr, Farmer, area residents on Alcantara, objected to the project because of increased traffic in a single family residential area, inadequate off-street parking, excessive noise (if the setback was reduced) and excessive density. No one else appeared on the matter. 4u'� Al" LAWRENCE STEVENS mu"m WARDEN Planning Director City Ma ager • /px if r1�F? u CITY OF ATASCADERO re 1979 0 _ Planning Department August 3, 1981 STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: Departmental Review R810714 : 1 and Variance V 810516: 1 LOCATION: 6600 & 6650 Alcantara Avenue (Lots 40 & 41, Block UA) APPLICANT: Dennis Moresco (Contract Survey & Design) REQUEST: To allow construction of eight two bedroom units and to reduce the required 25 ' front yard setback BACKGROUND 1. Existing Zoning: R-3-B-2-D (509) Medium Density Residential District with the "D (509)" to mean as follows: a. Departmental Review approval shall be required prior to the establishment of all uses. b Signing shall be limited to twenty (20) square feet • aggregate area unless allowed by Conditional Use Permit. C. No lots shall be created less than 10 ,000 square feet in area. 2. General Plan: High Density Multiple Family Residential 3. Allowable Density: The general plan land use designation permits 36 people per acre which would equate to the follow- ing for this project: Lot 40 _ .69 net acres X 36 people/acre 25 people - 9 people (in ex- isting triplex) (net density) 16 people Lot 41 = .44 net acres X 36 people/acre = 16 people Total density, including triplex = 41 people Total density, excluding triplex = 32 people 4 . Requested Density (including triplex): 33 people (11 two bedroom units) • Page Two Re: Departmental Review R810714: 1/Variance V810516 : 1 (Moresco) August 3, 1981 5. Environmental Determination: An initial study environmental description form has been completed for this project. The Planning Director has prepared a Conditional Negative Decla- ration indicating the project will not have a significant adverse effect upon the environment if certain mitigating measures are incorporated into the project. 6 . Site Conditions: Lot 40 is presently developed with an ex- isting triplex apartment complex. Lot 41 is presently vacant with no improvements. A major drainage way which is very densely vegetated traverses the rear approximately 45 feet of the property. Adjacent to the swale at the top of the slope bank to the north is a 15 foot wide sewer easement. The site slopes gradually down from Alcantara to the swale. Access is provided via a paved driveway off Alcantara on Lot 40 . With exception of landscaping around the building, the remainder of the lot is covered primarily with natural grasses and some heavier vegetation consisting of a variety of trees and shrubs in the swale area. City sewer and water are available to the site. 7 . Project Description: The applicant is proposing to build eight two bedroom townhouse units on the site in addition to three existing two story, two bedroom attached units. The applicant has also filed concurrently with this application a request for a tentative tract map to create air-space condominiums out of the eleven units. All of the units including the existing units are designed with one parking space underneath each unit. In addition to these eleven spaces under the units, eleven uncovered spaces are also proposed throughout the site. The applicant is also re- questing an effective ten foot reduction (measured to the edge of the right-of-way including the five foot offer of dedication) to the required 25 foot front yard setback in the R-3 zone. (The existing triplex has a 15 foot setback to the edge of the existing 40 foot right-of-way, effectively a ten foot setvack measured to the edge of the offer of dedication. ) Access is proposed to be maintained via the existing driveway off Alcantara, however, the applicant proposes to extend the driveway towards the rear of the site where it is proposed to branch off in a "T" form and generally follow along the top of the bank of the drainage channel. One trash enclosure and two turn-around insets are also proposed. Page Three Re: Departmental Review R810714 : 1/Variance V810516 : 1 (Moresco) • August 3 , 1981 Exterior finishes include primarily stucco with wood fascias and some diagonal wood siding on the second story (from the north elevation) over the entrance sections of the building. Exposed framing enclosures are proposed for the decks (south elevation) and roof covering is proposed to be composition shingles. No colors have been specified. Elevations indi- cate the overall height of the rear side of the buildings measured from grade (i.e. including garage) would be approx- t, giving a three story appearance. The front i e or e side facing Alcantara would have an overall height of approximately 25 feet measured from grade; giving a two-story appearance. STAFF COMMENTS During the Subdivision Review Board hearing on the Tentative Tract Map AT 810225 : 1 , there was extensive concern expressed with regard to the seemingly significant drainage channel at the rear of the property. Those concerns are equally valid in consideration of this Departmental Review, especially as they may relate to the Variance request for the front yard setback. Looking south across the property, it slopes gradually down to a relatively narrow but flat bench area and from there slopes quite steeply into the drainage channel that is very heavily "vegetated - so much so as to prevent easy passage. Basically, the "T" driveway extension going behind the two new buildings and providing accesses to the garages would lie generally in the bench area with some grading being extended toward the top of the slope of' the swale to provide a reasonable width in the driveway and some backup insets for parking. Concern is raised over the current stability of the top of the bank and the potential weakening of it by imposing fill over it; possibly increasing the steepness of the slope and the amount of sediment carried into the swale from natural erosion. Additional concerns involve the inadequate width and turning radii of the proposed driveway in certain areas and the potential maneuvering diffi- culties which could result. With regard to the variance request, it appears that there is some justification for reducing the setback, given the present unit design and layout, in an effort to minimize the potential negative impact on the integrity of the drainage channel . It should also be pointed out, however, that Staff does not com- ple4"ely disregard the fact that some other options including redesign, alternative site planning, a reduction in the number of units proposed or any combination of these options might Page Four Departmental Review R810714 : 1/Variance V810516 :1 (Moresco) August 3 , 1981 compliance with the required 25 foot setback as well as mitigate potential adverse effects to the drainage channel . FINDINGS 1 . There are extraordinary and exceptional circumstances appli- cable to the subject property with regard to the intrusion of the drainage channel that does not apply generally to other property in the 'same R-3 district. 2 . The granting of this variance will not adversely effect or be materially detrimental to the public welfare and to other improvements in the area since this lot is uniquely affected by the drainage channel and therefore the degration of the required front setback in the area in general will not result. 3. The granting of this :variar .e is necessary for the preser- vation of the,. ,app _icants ' property rights and"'for the pres- ` ervation of the integrity of the drainage channel and result- ing protection of property owners downstream since the pres- ence of the drainage channel restricts the property' s develop- ment in a manner which complies with required front yard set- backs. 4 . The site of the proposed residential use can be adequate in size and shape to accommodate said use and all yards, fencing, parking, landscaping and other features required by the Atas- cadero Municipal Code. 5. Streets in the vicinity of the proposed use are adequate to carry the quantity and kind of traffic generated. 6. The proposed use will have no adverse effect on abutting property or the permitted use thereof provided all conditions which follow are complied with. 7. The establishment and conduct of the multiple-family resi- dential use for which the Departmental Review is sought will not be detrimental to the public welfare or be injurious to property or improvements in said neighborhood. 8 . This application will not have a significant adverse effect upon the environment provided appropriate mitigation measures are incorporated into the project. Page Five Departmental Review R810714:1/Variance V810516 :1 (Moresco) August 3 , 1981 Based upon the above findings, the Planning Department recommends : A) Issuance of a Conditional Negative Declaration as follows : 1. Adequate provision be made for drainage, erosion and sediment control in conjunction with proposed improve- ments; and, B) Approval of Departmental Review R810714 :1 and Variance V810516 :1 subject to the following conditions : 1. Site development including buildings, aisles, parking, landscaping and other features shall be consistent with plans submitted and modifications as required by other conditions which follow. 2. Building architecture to be consistent with elevations submitted. a. Color schemes for exterior finishes for both existing new units shall be homogenous. b. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened from view from adjacent streets and properties in a manner approved by the Planning Department. 3 . Submit two copies of detailed landscape and irrigation plans indicating size, type and spacing of plant materials proposed for review and approval by the Planning Department prior to issuance of building permits. a. Raised concrete curbs or similar shall border each planter area, including the southerly edge of drive- way along the top of the drainage channel slope bank. b. Plant materials shall be sized to achieve a mature appearance within three years. C. The type of irrigation system shall depend upon the plant materials used and their watering needs. d. Plant materials for the purpose of protection of slopes from erosion shall be planted in such a manner beyond the driveway so as to blend in with the natu- ral vegetation in the drainage channel. 0 Page Six Departmental Review R810714 :1/Variance V810516 :1 (Moresco) August 3 , 1981 4 . Submit two sets of grading and drainage plans indicating grade of building pads, pavement elevations , flow lines at top of curb,, etc . , for review and approval by the City Planning and Public Works Departments prior to issuance of any permits. a. Drainage from site shall not be allowed to flow directly to adjacent properties or across any public sidewalks or driveways . b. All grading onsite shall conform to Appendix Chapter 70 of the Uniform Building Code especially as it re- lates to compaction of any imported fill on the site. Any grading necessary for site development shall be subject to first securing proper permit and approval from the Planning Department. C. The drainage and grading plans shall make adequate provision for control of erosion and sedimentation. • 5. Onsite signing shall be limited to an aggregate area of 20 square feet for the entire project site, not to ex- ceed the height of the building unless a Conditional Use Permit is secured. 6 . Lighting fixtures shall not project above the roof of the building and shall be designed to minimize onsite and offsite glare. 7 . A minimum of 13 total 9 ' X 20 ' parking spaces shall be provided. Parking and access areas shall be paved with a minimum 2" AC on adequate base, and spaces shall be paint striped. Wheel stops or approved functional equivalent shall be provided. a. It is suggested that the driveway onto Alcantara be widened to 24 feet but shall be no less than 20 feet to provide adequate passing space for two vehicles. All other driveway aisles shall also be a minimum of 20 feet except where back-up space is necessary be- hind parking spaces , in which cases a clear area of 24 feet shall be provided behind each parking space. b. A revised parking layout incorporating the above re- quirements shall be submitted for review and approval • by the Planning Department at the time of building permit application. Page Seven • Departmental Review R810714 :1/Variance V810516 :1 (Moresco) August 3, 1981 C. Provide a raised concrete curb or similar berm along the edge of parking and driveway areas adjacent to the drainage channel . 8 . All new utilities and utility connections shall be placed underground. 9 . The project shall be connected to community water and sewer system. Submit evidence from the Atascadero Mutual Water Company and the Atascadero County Sanitation Dis- trict indicating that they are willing and able to provide service prior to the issuance of permits. a. The applicant shall coordinate with the Atascadero Mutual Water Company prior to connection to City water with regard to compliance with Condition #10 . 10 . The applicant shall install one fire hydrant in the vicinity of the project of exact size, type, location and manner of installation specified by the Fire Chief . Said fire hydrant to be installed prior the final of build- • ing permit (or prior to recordation of Final Map - Ref . AT 810225 : 1 - whichever occurs first) . The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department written evidence that the fire hydrant has been installed. to the Fire Department `.s satisfaction. a. It is suggested the applicant coordinate with the Atascadero Mutual Water Company for their upgrad- ing of the water line in Alcantara Avenue prior to installation of the fire hydrant. 11. It is suggested that property line fencing be provided along the side property lines. Materials and design for any such fencing are to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department. 12 . Provide paved and enclosed trash storage areas as shown. 13 . Applicant shall install concrete curb, gutter, and side- walk along the Alcantara frontage of the subject property prior to final building permit (or prior to recordation of Final clap - Ref : AT 810225 : 1 - whichever occurs first) . a. A five foot offer of dedication shall be provided along the property frontage and be maintained as an easement behind the sidewalk. b. Said improvements shall be constructed under an inspection agreement and encroachment permit issued by the Public Works Department. • Page Eight Departmental Review R810714 :1/Variance V810516 :1 (Moresco) - August 3, 1981 C. Improvements may be deferred by improvement bond or similar guarantee. 14 . Provide a front yard setback of no less than 15 feet as measured from the edge of Alcantara right-of-way including the five foot offer of dedication. a. This requirement does not apply to the existing tri- plex unit. 15. In the event that archaeological resources are discovered on the subject site during construction of this project, said resources are to remain undistrubed after recovery and construction activity shall cease immediately. The Planning Department is to be notified so that proper disposition of the resources may be accomplished. 1.6 . This Departmental Review R810714 :1 and Variance V810516 :1 are granted for a maximum period of one year from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is • granted by the Planning Director pursuant to a written request filed a minimum of ten days prior to the expi- ration date. 17. All conditions of approval established herein shall be complied with prior to occupancy of the building by the proposed use. ACTION The Planning Commission should by motion direct Staff as deemed appropriate. TO APPROVE: Motion to adopt findings and set conditions. TO DENY: Motion setting findings for denial. REPORT PREPARED BY ; I. &&'!.i z MARY E . BEATIE ciate REPORT APPROVED BY: As o ;4; r . L RENCE STEVENS Planning Director /Ps . 7, .4 MORRO AVE Les "w S9 39 Lai u,c, 16 4,9�1 of G•�h\t r lAl 95F5 1 10 L. 1 x.11-I�lrYy \�- N r\� '' •v� ? S.,o6 r. r. ip OL- Oil �lJ w 7 7 O ,. v � 1 •+yam/ ° C N Ip NIS 5 -Y Y �. ,�. B •o30-A V_I_�� •2 / EB1. 7037,% ` 7 77O5pJ/•l Q 41v65o+z7C-1 (51 7) 10-A v v � j 'co.(O9 •)03i ��o• r 4 .�a�0�o��'� •14 �z-��. 10 / 13 E :U7 9: 2 16 2/ is E 22 /4 ��029 17 - 6 23 K•� , ` V ? (v ?2. ho / /. 25 + 26 44 9 x333 � 2 7 3 43 �. 28 42 ` �•.2 7 29 :41 40 tif, 3 �,$��2�6:�: X79 '; �.` �FLL n ; 2 ���/ 3 30 ._ , I 13 -, 31 33 34 35 36 + 2 ' 1 2 r - vls- r 32 � Z co- 3-11 18 �7�O7O/•Y 18 •977O, P_ \ \ -lel 16 ( 2 2\ 2� \(O ykf \ 182415 2 B `� I �_ ,4 26 1,5 /3 25 / /9 26 T I Z ZCA))A)9 A4 AP 20 27 12 10 �4 &(05o A �- %5 2 p li UA 2 9 0 �7 n 40d 4/ B4GL�k -ZZ4 - a Q7 — 9 V810516- l Y 1 _. --!b _ - _ r R$107/4 :/ f � - , -�� • � � L� Vi=i -77 �lk � * , mco -`� p r mp n r s N ry i 'C _�►-- j r I CIO rA ^ Yee `V' i �r;� � �� �� ^r•' / – '- -�\ N • Fill p —,l t?} Uuu 6 ri tit �►Jvl I� I •� fC -1/ o� 1-0.-�taS"�' �S _ `�'�` P I(r� o C[Jf3 F L� PAD A' Aj Cc 11 sg _Q'1 °'�!C �� _J_ �:T T9 k- /�-� II �•i S lel'o it_. T�9� ��o to ----------------------- v o +r I �tlai IM J.:, N � ' 1111 A,:� �. N o u-•r .• �=�'1 p �"" 1 — � R� 1 ° i w I �•:,� :. ``i -z . -- ��� �� _� T- . _i,*� 1 ,�.���'i � � age I � I n _ck) T t 1 nto_+1____._ ARC HI TE CT URE PLANNING - s F/P NA (� yr t ti ` l k 0 6 zf -71 17, 01 VI I : V Y- 10 ti, 1• (vim* �j, ! � \� �` z� r. f f N J a 9 4,1 I al TECT URE PL A N N I N C :: 'mss. M^E M_O_R A N_D U M_: TO: CITY MANAGER August 5, 1981 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: ROAD ABANDONMENT A801210 :1 LOCATION: 2450-2500 E1 Camino Real (Lots 6 & 7 , Block 23) APPLICANT: James Gaskell and James Wentzel REQUEST: To abandon Madera Place between Freeway 101 and El Camino Real On June 15, 1981 the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the above-referenced matter and on July 6 unanimously (with Commissioner Wentzel not participating) adopted Resolution 9-81 establishing findings and approving the abandonment subject to Conditions 1-3 listed in the attached Staff Report. There was only brief discussion among the Planning Commission on the matter. No one appeared on the matter. LAWRENCE STEVENS MURRAY L. /WARDEN Planning Director City Manager /Ps I • I % CITY OF ATASCADERO T „ ;,,,� Planning Department June 15 , 1981 Ifl1l3 C A�II 1978 \ GADO% -STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: Road Abandonment A8012101 LOCATION: 2450-2500 El Camino Real (Lots 6 and 7 , Block 23) APPLICANT: James Gaskell and James Wentzel REQUEST: To abandon Madera Place between Freeway 101 and El Camino Real BACKGROUND 1. Existing Zoning: The road is unzoned but adjacent property is zoned C-2-D and A-1-22, 2 General Plan: Commercial ,Parka 3. Environmental Determination: The Planning Director has deter- mined the application as presented to be Categorically Exempt from the requirements of C.E.Q.A, ; and the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report is not required. 4. Project Description: The applicant proposes to abandon Madera Place. Currently, Madera Place is a cul-de-sac of approximately 250 feet in length between Highway 101 right-of-way and El Camino Real, The road has no freeway access and only Lots 6 and 7 in Block 23 have frontage. Prior to the construction of Highway 101, Madera Place was known as Conejo Road and was a through road. STAFF COMMENTS Access to E1 Camino Real will adequately serve these two parcels since both already have frontage on it and no apparent purpose beneficial to the general public would be realized by the retention of Madera as a public road. The freeway limits its usefulness to only the applicants. Abandonment could mean better development of the sites, more land on the tax rolls and lower road costs . Page Two • Re: Road Abandonment A801210:1 (Gaskell/Wentzel) June 15 , 1981 FINDINGS 1. The application as submitted will not have a significant effect upon the environment and the preparation of an En- vironmental Impact Report is not necessary. 2 . No beneficial purpose would be accomplished by the retention of a public road in the current location of Madera Place . RECOMMENDATION Based upon the above Findings, the Planning Department recommends that Madera Place be abandoned and that Staff be directed' to pre- pare a resolution approving the abandonment subject to the following : 1. The northerly portion of the right-of-way to the centerline of Madera Place (also called Conejo Road) shall become part of Lot 7 and the southerly portion to the centerline of Madera Place shall become part of Lot 6 . • 2 . ,Any existing utility or similar easements for poles , conduits, irrigation ditches, waterlines, etc. , are not affected by this road abandonment. 3. The applicants shall submit title information to the satis- faction of the Planning Department to verify that the road to be abandoned has previously been offered or accepted for public road purposes. ACTION 1. Direct by motion preparation of resolution approving abandon- ment for July 6 , 1981 Consent Calendar agenda. 2 . Set motion and findings for denial. REPORT PREPARED BY', JOHN KENNALY Assistant Civil Engineer REPORT APPROVED BY; aU4710 _ . LAWRENCE STEVENS Planning Director /Ps __ � _ � a � �: �' R r. j`si�� �3 a n. '�i .-t° `-a,'.., t � ��'l� 'a�"�'�•�x`4�•"y^i f 4 � a l..- Mq � i Axa � •� ..p exp � � ��. � :�a .� �+,r'°d �'+� �`-C *.' �� �,, '� � � ^s A� \ ae '' � ��� � -�q�„ .. '}";`' - x�'�-�� -.����"' r, _ � � ••tom � r s `�k. �� -} 'ri � -.C1. \"`�.. fi� � w t �� � �?'+,�,+� '�`;, � =-3�r�-»�'�s� s��� ,SFr .tee � '�} :� ✓-` � e-v \ +'S i 1��, ae�..�a, ;'a3 �'� ,- ti• - m.� a-� �. s 'e+z.T,g� fin, � s- �. � �Y F •+�-� -r' ��;� d x.,\ hti ,,,,gay.�a'Y :M�.,u�1 f \ �� ' • r 1 i A - v �. .. • � J�,9. g NtC 1 sk ~w • " ,• }`�" t�..' ,ISS • � �2 \ w � 0 / ,fib 2 r Loci-rl oN /✓m P �-f�lsa., -x.w+n .��:.iys:a .+t�4....:'.;x,f`"'r'✓:-?'tea....-.r:a, _ „ 7 lob I r/os bl xk7 cD� -- OV -s 01( OL'))\00) , V\ 061 2 ` O n'4 z a.raj 3Hy / �Yo N ��� •� a °9 �1 �•s \ � °`/� moo/ �C .(1 '�x V •1'i� ?. e9 /' C Ya2i G�11 cr ,ui. 4'dd'N'OLS .9� �°J\ \ CN _ - t� <Jc Li`l 11 Gl J - � 5 IBM Not T CUP d VW -JN//voz ,d �z . x x ^' to Q �iZ-1 y r -TR HA Wells bi € »WW It r $ ig t . QlAvyAll / O Q_g F r ti s %-� AI �a -9 s I- -+s` Q LTi —U^i bRK r r P'�'� z0, /�yq�pay�/� x . 7f 'i kF ,� sslY W1- 1: .5u h-'.tR y 's A• _ "7 C ;Rim .. I > _ ¢ Wo 0 tz js. i- f '§a• *k''$,�•r''' n asra 1yp +a7 '1`% b}` 5 m-t'.,j ' v"� a J 1. vi ^L'.,, 'a < (y > k { w WORK um ��Z z d *c s •' 77 a1 ,a'R, �#^,,r-. w£ a t Sx10 b P A IN n • 0 RESOLUTION NO. 24 • A RESOLUTION OF THE ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL APPROVING THE ABANDONMENT ,OF MADERA PLACE BETWEEN EL CAMINO REAL AND FREEWAY 101 WHEREAS , the Atascadero Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the requested road abandonment and adopted Resolution No. 9-81 recommending approval; and WHEREAS, the Atascadero City Council has conducted a public hearing on the requested abandonment; and WHEREAS, the application as submitted will not have a signi- ficant effect upon the environment and the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report is not necessary; and WHEREAS, no beneficial purpose would be accomplished by the retention of a public road in the current location of Madera Place; and WHEREAS, abandonment of Madera Place is consistent with Land Use and Circulation Elements of the 1980 Atascadero General Plan NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Atascadero City Council does hereby approve the abandonment of Madera Place between E1 Camino • Real and Freeway 101 , subject to the following conditions : 1. The northerly portion of the right-of-way to the center line of Madera Place (also called Conejo Road) shall be- come part of Lot 7 and the southerly portion to the centerline of Madera Place shall become part of Lot 6 . 2 . Any existing utility or similar easements for poles, conduits, irrigation ditches, waterlines, etc. , are not affected by this road abandonment. 3 . The applicants shall submit title information to the satisfaction of the Planning Department to verify that the road to be abandoned has previously been offered or accepted for public road purposes . AYES: NOES : ABSENT: DATE ADOPTED: ROBERT J. WILKINS , JR. , Mayor ATTEST: • MURRAYiAS WAR EN, City Clerk APPROVT FORM:# ALLEN GRIMES , City Attorney M E M O R A N D U M TO: City Council FROM: City Manager SUBJECT: San Luis Obispo County/Cities Basic Plan for Peacetime Emergencies You have previously been provided with the 21 pages estab- lishing an administrative framework for a County/Cities emergency plan which will coordinate City and County responses to peacetime emergencies. It should be noted that this plan is distinct from the so-called Diablo Canyon Plan. From this initial administra- tive plan will evolve specific appendices detailing actual re- sponsibilities in response to various emergency situations. At this point, the attached plan does not makeany commitment of our resources. Those commitments will be specified in follow-on documents. The City staff has reviewed the document concurs with its provisions. As a matter of fact , thus far we have been involved in the coordinated city and County effort in • drafting this document. Your approval of this initial plan is necessary in order for us to proceed to the full development of various contingency arrangements. Accordingly, it is suggested that you approve and adopt the San Luis Obispo County/Cities Basic Plan for Peacetime Emergencies dated 1981 . MU RA L. WARDEN MLW: ad 8-6-81 • 1 ""�.s+�.. ... ti ..,.- ,.. _,., a y.a; "s 'x.r� 3 r�s.�?.-.Y f -' :� t,�•��,�"°'+'s.^.'3�. .s�,.y�+g��.+w.."$�`e't• ria� .w�•r�`",.�s,r., t •,,, �: �5 r 'b �Y�/:T � .*sa�.3-{",,,. -eS ,�',.r2C .✓o'�dr 5� t�n.'.ydwis '��1.,- 'ro-f27 'ew'R?'^a"a' „c-'"�'i`ua. .„.a`. F.s,s7i'+ .r� h '`'h`.+ r+,._Y.)s)Ss„ a`°'Y'v+eo-a"r` �nr. 4-"`�.$'ECy�y ''?$ i. t�'�:: . _M_E_M_0 R_A_N_D_U_M_ TO: City Council FROM: City Manager SUBJECT: Alvord Field Improvement Project The attached resolution is necessary in order for us to claim the $60 , 979 which is our share of the 1980 Parklands Act. If you will recall , the availability of this money was related to you earlier this year . The Recreation Department in conjunction with the Advisory Board is recommending expenditure of these funds for improvements to Alvord Field . The project includes lighting, installation of an undergound watering system, bleachers , back- stop, dugout benches and landscaping for a total cost of $68 ,318. Submission of this resolution is necessary in order to have these funds available during the next year. We are under no necessity to apply now for this grant if thereare any other projects which you feel are of a higher priority for the use of the grant monies. If there are no other such projects , then there is no reason not to proceed with the grant application. This really is not a grant application in the usual sense of the word since the money is already ours. However, we are required to secure State approval for projects falling within the grant authorization. Again , unless there are projects of a higher ' priority which you would like to consider, it would be appropriate to proceed with the improvements to Alvord Field using grant monies as indicated. M RRA L. WARDEN MLW: ad 8-6-81 1 • 0 RESOLUTION NO. 23-81 RESOLUTION OF THE ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL • APPROVING APPLICATION FOR 1980 STATE GRANT MONIES FOR THE ALVORD FIELD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, the people of the State of California have enacted the California Parklands Act of 1980 , which provides funds to the State of California and its political subdivisions for acquiring lands and for developing facilities for public recreation and historical purposes; and WHEREAS, said procedures established by the State Department of Parks and Recreation require the City Council to certify, by resolution, the approval of applications prior to submission of said applications to the State; and WHEREAS, the City of Atascadero wishes to install certain improvements in lighting and watering systems, spectator and playing facilities at the recreation facility known as Alvord Field; and WHEREAS, the City of Atascadero wishes to use funds available through the California Parklands Act of 1980 to help pay for the cost of these improvements; and WHEREAS, said applications contain assurances that the applicant must comply with; and • WHEREAS, the City of Atascadero will enter into an agreement with the State of California for the acquisition and/or development of the project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Atascadero City Council: 1. Approves the filing of an application for 1980 State grant assistance for said project; and 2. Certifies that the City Council understands the assurances and certification in the application; and 3. Certifies that the City of Atascadero has or will have sufficient funds to operate and maintain the project; and 4. Certifies that the City of Atascadero has reviewed and understands the General Provisions contained in the State/ local agreement; and 5. Appoints the City Manager as agent of the City to conduct all negotiations, execute and submit all documents including but not limited to applications, agreements , amendments, payment requests, and so on which may be necessary for the completion of the aforementioned project. Resolution No. 23-81 Page Two • On motion b o y Councilman and seconded by Councilman the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ADOPTED: ROBERT J. WILKINS, JR. , Mayor ATTEST: MURRAY L. WARD , City Clerk • APPROVED AS TO RM: s ALLEN GRIMES, City Attorney • • State of California—The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION CALIFORNIA PARKLANDS ACT OF 1980 APPLICATION FOR LOCAL ASSISTANCE GRANT Project Title`. Amount of Grant Requested S. $60 ,979 ALVORD FIELD LIGHTING PROJECT (Min.Grant$20,000) Estimated Total Project Cost $6 8 318 Applicant (Agency—address incl,zip code) Source of Matching (Acq.only) CITY OF ATASCADERO P.O. BOX 747 ATASCADERO, CA. 94323 Project Location: County SAN LUIS OBISPO Nearest City ATASCADERO State Senate District No. Address and Nearest Cross Street: CORNER OF PORTOLA ROAD AND State Assembly District No. HIGHWAY 41 (MORRO ROAD) Applicants'Representative Authorized in Resolution (type) MURRAY L. WARDEN CITY MANAGER (801 466-8000 (Name) (Title) (Phone) Person with day-today responsibility for project(if different from authorized representative) (type) CHARLES JOANNES RECREATION DIRECTOR (80� 466-8000 (Name) (Title) (Phone) • Description of Project (Brief) INSTALLATION OF OVERHEAD LIGHTING AT ALVORD FIELD FOR NIGHT SPORTS USE. INSTALLATION OF AN UNDERGROUND AUTOMATIC WATERING SYSTEM. INSTALLATION OF FOUR SETS OF PORTABLE ALUMINUM BLEACHERS. INSTALLATION OF ONE BACKSTOP. INSTALLATION OF DUGOUT BENCHES. LANDSCAPING AROUND PERIMITER OF THE BASEBALL FIELD. Land Tenure—Project land is: 4 n R acres: Project land will be: acres: XXX owned in fee simple by applicant acquired in fee simple by applicant available under a year lease acquired in other than fee simple(explain) other interest (explain) I certify that the information contained in this application, including required attachments, is accurate and that i have read and understand the important information and assurances on the reverse of this form. If this project is for acquisition,and applicant is not exempt, I further certify that there is available, or will become available prior to the commencement of any work on the project for which application for a grant has been made,matching money from a nonstate source. • Signed Applicant's Authorized Representative as Shown in Resolution Date -11- DPR 651 (11/80) 0 ! pj- DEVELOPMENT COST ESTIMATE Development Costs Lighting System Steel poles (Including concrete bases) $24 ,331 Lights (1500w metal halide lamps) 14, 488 Underground wiring and switch gear; material & labor 10,349 Labor - Mounting lighting assemblies 537 Labor Setting poles and drilling holes 1,303 Underground Watering System ($5, 000 per acre) 7 ,500 Bleachers (Four sets/five rows each) 3, 376 Backstop ('20 ' high x 60 ' long) 21799 Dugout Benches (two) 250 Landscaping 500 Labor - Installation of water system, bleachers, backstop, dugout benches and landscaping 2, 885 Total $68 , 318 • • ht- PILES t t v h" f�1 !'r , :S k �1 6 .N •