The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda Packet 01/11/1981 7 AGENDA - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting January 11, 1981 7:30 p.m. Atascadero Administration Building Call to Order Pledge of Allegiance Invocation Roll Call Public Comment A. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Item A, Consent Calendar , are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion in the form listed below. There will be no separate discussion of these items. " If dis- cussion is required, that item will be removed from the Consent Calen- dar and will be considered separately. Vote may be by roll call. 1. Minutes of the regular meeting of December 14, 1981 (RECOM- MEND APPROVAL) 2. Treasurer ' s Report, 12-1-81 to 12-31-81 (RECOMMEND APPROVAL) Resolution No. 1-82 accepting work and giving notice of com- .._.i. pletion for the reconstruction of Balboa Road (Contract No. 81-17) (RECOMMEND ADOPTION) 4. Resolution No. 2-82 accepting work and giving notice of com- pletion for the 1982 overlay project (Contract No. 81-15) (RECOMMEND ADOPTION) 5. Lot Line Adjustment LA 811021:1, 5880 Encino, Garry and Virginia Brill (Stewart) , to adjust existing lot line to pro- vide better access and better building site (RECOMMEND APPRO- VAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) 6. Acceptance of Parcel Map AT 801212: 1, 10275 Escondido Road, AlexKuczynski (Hilliard) (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECONMMENDATION) 7 . Tentative Parcel Map AT 811028: 1, between Santa Lucia and Cencerro Roads, Tenneco Realty Development (Twin Cities) , to allow resubdivision of five existing lots providing for a new road alignment for Cencerro Road (RECOMMEND ?APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) AGENDA ATASCADER ITY COUNCIL - JANUARY 11,09$2 8. Tentative Parcel Map AT 80-96 , 8600 El Camino Real, Dove Investments (Stewart) , to extend the time allowed to com- plete requirements omplete. requirements for an approved parcel map (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) 9. Tentative Parcel Map AT 80-97 , 8600 El Camino Real, Eaglet Investments (Stewart) to extend the time allowed to com- plete requirements for an approved parcel map (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) 10 . Variance V811125:1, 7955 Santa Lucia, Jack Adams/Jerry Lueck (Smith) , to allow a proposed single family residence to encroach into the required 25 foot front yard adjacent to Mira Flores (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION REC- OMMENDATION) 11. Road Name Change - Tecolote Road, initiated by the Planning Department to change the name of a portion of Tecolote Road (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) B. HEARINGS, APPEARANCES AND REPORTS 1. Report regarding State recommendations for El Camino Real parking 2. Report regarding San Luis Obispo County Area Council of Governments agenda C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Ordinance No. 47 establishing requirements in accordance with the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 second reading D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Set ,date to interview applicants for Appeals Board E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION 1. City Council 2. City Attorney 3. City Manager 2 AGENDA - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting January 12, 1981 7 : 30 p.m. Atascadero Administration Building Call to Order Pledge of Allegiance Invocation Roll Call Public Comment A. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Item A, Consent Calendar, are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion in the form listed below. There will be no separate discussion of these items . If discussion is required, that item will be removed from the Consent Calendar and will be considered separately. Vote may be by roll call. 1. Minutes of the special meeting of December 8 , 1980 (RECOMMEND APPROVAL) 2. Minutes of the adjourned regular meeting of December 22, 1980 (RECOMMEND APPROVAL) 3 . Minutes of the regular meeting of December 22, 1980 • (RECOMMEND APPROVAL) 4 . Treasurer' s Report, 12-1-80 to 12-31-80 (RECOMMEND APPROVAL) 5. Resolution No. 1-81 establishing fees for bicycle licenses (RECOMMEND APPROVAL) 6 . Lot line adjustment LA 801113 :1, 8400 San Rafael Road, John and Jackie Hutcherson (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS) 7 . Parcel map AT 80-57 , 9100 Pino Solo, ._Loyd Sims_ (Baumberger) (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) 8 . Parcel map AT 800829 :1, 10325 Atascadero Rd. , Fred Hartman (Morgan) (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) B. HEARINGS, APPEARANCES AND REPORTS 1. Appeal of Peter Del Vaglio from Planning Commission deci- sion concerning dance facility and fastfood kitchen, Lago Avenue and Hwy. 41 2. Appearance of Nancy Sherer requesting City assistance in constructing and maintaining two community identification signs 3. Appearance of Henry K. Adams regarding traffic situation in front of Post Office 4 . City Attorney' s Report No. 9 C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Salary adjustments - Fire Chief and City, Attorney AGENDA ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting January 12, 1981 Page Two D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Recommendation from Parks and Recreation Advisory Board concerning hiring of a Recreation Director 2. Resolution No. 2-81 approving participation in the National Flood Insurance Program 3 . Resolution No. 3-81 authorizing the adjustment and settle- ment of claims against the City 4 . Consideration of Agreement with County Department of Employment and Training Services regarding CETA employees 5 . Traffic control recommendations E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION 1. City Council 2. City Attorney 3. City Manager MINUTES - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL Special Meeting- / December 8, 1980 6 : 30 p.m. l • Atascadero Administration Building I The meeting was called to order at 6 :30 p.m. by Mayor Wilkins. PRESENT: Councilmen Highland, Mackey, Nelson, Stover and. Mayor Wilkins ABSENT: None Mayor Wilkins noted that the meeting was called to ,interview applicants for Planning Commissioner. Council interviewed Cecil Barrett, Roger Basham, Gregg Ellison, John Euphrat, and Henry Hohenstein. Council adjourned to Monday, December 22, 1980, at 6 : 30 p.m. to complete the interviewing of applicants. The meeting adjourned at 7 :15 p.m. Recorded by: MURRAY L. WARDEN • City Clerk MINUTES - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL Adjourned Regular Meeting December 22, 1980 6 :30 p.m. Atascadero Administration Building The meeting was called to order at 6 :30 p.m. by Mayor Wilkins. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Councilmen Highland, Mackey, Nelson, Stover and Mayor Wilkins ABSENT: None This meeting was continued from December 8 , 1980, to complete interviewing applicants for Planning Commissioner. Council inter- viewed John McNeil, George Molina, Frank Scicchitano, Michael Sherer, Christopher Smith, and J. P. Smith. After some discussion, Michael Sherer was selected as Planning Commissioner for the unexpired term of Norman Norton. This term expires July 31 , 1981. Mr. Sherer will be seated at the Planning Commission meeting of January 5, 1981. The meeting adjourned at 7 :25 p.m. • Recorded by: MURRAY L. WARDEN City Clerk 3 MINUTES - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting • December 22, 1980 7 : 30 p.m. Atascadero Administration Building The meeting was called to order at 7: 30 p.m. by Mayor Wilkins with the Pledge of Allegiance. Reverend Lon Eckdahl of the Atascadero Nazarene Church gave the invocation. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Councilmen Highland, Mackey, Nelson, Stover and Mayor Wilkins ABSENT: None A. CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Minutes of the regular meeting of December 8, 1980 (RECOMMEND APPROVAL) 2. Parcel Map AT 79•-263 ,7345 Encinal Avenue, Gordon Hilchey (Hilliard) (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) 3. Parcel Map AT 800811:1, 8950 Atascadero Avenue, Harry W. Smith (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDA- TION) • 4 . Parcel Map AT 80-72 10785 Vista Road, Richard and Alice Todd (Stewart) (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) Councilman Mackey requested that Item A-4 be removed from the Consent Calendar for further discussion. MOTION: Councilman Nelson moved for the approval of the Consent Calendar with the exception of Item A-4 . The motion was seconded by Councilman Stover and unanimously carried by roll call vote. A-4 Parcel Map AT 80-72, 10785 Vista Road, Richard and Alice Todd (Stewart) Councilman Mackey questioned the access to Vista Road. Larry Stevens, Planning Director, advised that the access is on San Marcos which is paved except for the last twenty feet. _ MOTION: Councilman Nelson moved for approval of the Planning Commission' s recommendation. The motion was seconded by Councilman Stover and unanimously carried by roll call vote. B. HEARINGS, APPEARANCES AND REPORTS • 1 . Report by City Manager on status of census Mr. Warden discussed the census count received from the Bureau of Census which was 16 ,797 based upon last summer' s count. A sub- • MINUTES - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting December 22, 1980 Page Two sequent count indicated 17,100 or 17,200, but that included the State Hospital residents as well as some previously overlooked Atascadero areas. Putting the State Hospital aside, the City will probably have a final count of 16 ,200 or 16, 300 . Once the census has been certified, it will lower the amounts received from State subventions; this will take place in January, 1981. C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Agreement with County Health Department for services Mr. Warden reviewed the Agreements which cities have with the County Health Department for providing various health services. Some agreements involve payment of $1. 00 per month or $10 .00 per year for health services which provides a limited range of health inspections, i.e. restaurants. other examples would be septic tank enforcements and food establishments. Another type of agreement would cost $25.00 per month to provide a health officer for the City and which would provide the State statutory duties as well as City requirements. Mr. Warden recommended adoption of the agreement costing $25.00 per month. Mayor Wilkins questioned inspections of purified/mountain water stands located in front of the grocery stores in Atascadero. . At the present time, the City is still operating under the County Health codes. MOTION: Councilman Nelson moved for approval of the Agreement for $25 . 00 per month. The motion was seconded by Councilman Stover and unanimously carried by roll call vote. 2. Street maintenance equipment Mr. Warden reviewed this matter stating that, at the beginning of the year, the City did not have a clear picture of what the equip- ment needs of the City would be. As a result, the City used a lease/ rental method rather than going out to purchase the equipment. As operations have progressed, the City has found a consistent need for a tractor/back-hoe/skip loader. Discussion centered around the feasibility of purchasing this piece of equipment as opposed to con- tinuing the rental. Mr. Warden asked Council for authorization to go to bid for the tractor with necessary attachments and change the budget from a lease/rental to a purchase for that particular item. He stated that bids would be solicited on the tractor/backhoe which would probably be in a price range between $30, 000 and $35 ,000. MOTION: Councilman Mackey moved for approval of this proposal. The motion was seconded by Councilman Nelson and unani- mously carried by roll call vote. MINUTES - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting December 22, 1980 • Page Three D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Salary review Mr. Warden reviewed a salary survey conducted of the various cities throughout the County to compare salary ranges with those of Atascadero. Adjustments were requested for the Engineering Aide and Clerical Assistant III (for the Police Department) positions . At the time these positions were established, the City did not have a clear picture of all of the duties which these two positions require. It is now realized that more intensive duties are involved and Mr. Warden requested that these two positions be adjusted to` a higher range on the salary plan. Mr. Warden also discussed salary adjustments for the City employees, excluding the Fire Department and Fire Chief. Recommendations for the City personnel were: a. City employees, excluding Department Heads - a loo increase b. Department Heads - 7 1/2% salary increase The following motions were made with regard to the salary review: • MOTION: Councilman Highland moved that the Engineering Aide and Clerical Assistant III in the Police Department be moved from salary ranges 8 and 9 respectively, to salary range 13. The motion was seconded by Councilman Nelson and unanimously carried by roll call vote. MOTION: Councilman Highland moved that the Clerical Assistant III in the Police Department be changed to a Records and Dispatch Supervisor. The motion was seconded by Councilman Nelson and unanimously carried. MOTION: Councilman Highland moved for the adoption of the pro- posed adjusted salary schedule for non-department head employees as presented. The motion was seconded by Councilman Nelson and unanimously carried by roll call vote. MOTION: Councilman Highland moved that the Department Head salary range be adjusted upward by 7 1/20 . The motion was seconded by Councilman Stover and carried on the following roll call vote: AYES : Councilmen Highland, Stover and Mayor Wilkins • NOES : Councilmen Mackey and Nelson Mr. Warden advised that the Fire Chief would be held at his current salary which is higher than the City schedule even with the 7 1/2o increase MINUTES - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting December 22, 1980 Page Four • Councilman Highland indicated that his motion regarding Depart- ment Heads was intended to include City Manager. MOTION: Councilman Highland moved that the proposed salary increases be effective January 1, 1981. The motion was seconded by Councilman Stover and carried with Councilmen Mackey and Nelson voting no. MOTION: Councilman Highland moved that the sum of $46 ,502 be transferred from contingency reserve to the proper salary fund. The motion was seconded by Councilman Stover and carried on the following roll call vote: AYES : Councilmen Highland, Stover and Mayor Wilkins NOES : Councilmen Mackey and Nelson Allen Grimes, City Attorney brought up the matter of his con- tract fees and suggested that the Council authorize the same increase for him as for Department Heads. Mayor Wilkins felt that Mr. Grimes should present an amendment to his contract for Council consideration since his fees had not been a matter for discussion this evening. E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION 1. City Council (a) Councilman Nelson asked about the Lake Pavilion use for -recreation activities. Mr. Warden stated that the AYA has approved, City use of the facility and meetings are scheduled to discuss the City' s control of the building. (b) Councilman Mackey invited everyone to stay after the meeting for cookies and coffee. (c) Councilman Mackey stated that she would possibly not be at the next Council meeting. (d) Mayor Wilkins requested that a certificate be pre- pared for Norman Norton, resigning Planning Commissioner. (e) Councilman Nelson complimented the Recreation Department on their first brochure. 2 City Attorney Mr. Grimes had nothing to report. • MINUTES - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting December 22, 1980 Page Five 3. City Manager (a) Mr. Warden reminded Council to get in their reser- vations for the Channel Counties Division meeting at Vandenberg. (b) Mr. Warden advised that the Police Department will be offering an escort service New Year' s Eve for those citizens who feel they should not be driving. They can call the Police Department and a uniformed officer will pick them up and take them home. This service will be offered between the hours of 8 :00 p.m. and 4 :00 a.m. New Years Eve. (c) Mr. Warden stated that Jim Wakefield of the Police Department has been appointed Youth Services Officer as part of a County-wide Youth Services Task Force which is funded by the State primarily for juvenile alcohol abuse. This program is currently funded through July 1, 1981, but may be refunded after that time. The meeting adjourned at 8 :24 p.m. • Recorded by : MURRAY L. WARDEN, City Clerk By: Deborah Cini Clerical Assistant • CITY OF ATASCADERO TREASURER.°S REPORT DECEMBER 1, 1980 TO DECEMBER 31, 1950 • BALANCE AS OF NOVEMBER 30 , 1980 $ 62 ,682. 07 RECEIVED (Per attached items) 326 ,969 . 40 TOTAL $389,651. 47 PAID Warrant Registar 81-061 11,455. 00 it " If " if " " " 81-062 122,551. 03 if of If it it If 81-063 21,355. 69 n ° it if If It n it 81-064 27 ,525. 72 11 if IT it it " If if 81-065 103,537 . 92 (Including Payrolls dated 12-3, 12-17, and 12-31) Payables Listing 100 ,045. 90 TOTAL $386 ,471. 26 BALANCE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1980 $ 3,180.21 PETTY CASH ON HAND $ 49. 94 LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND $225,000. 00 TIME DEPOSIT, MID-STATE BANK 15. 15% Interest, Matures 4/24/81 100,000 . 00 • TIME DEPOSIT, MID-STATE BANK 14. 25% Interest, Matures 5/17/81 200 ,000. 00 TIME DEPOSIT, MID-STATE BANK 15. 75% Interest, Matures 2/22/81 100,000. 00 TIME DEPOSIT, MID-STATE BANK 15. 75% Interest, Matures 2/22/81 100 , 000. 00 TIME DEPOSIT, MID-STATE BANK 15. 75% Interest, Matures 2/22/81 100 ,000. 00 TIME DEPOSIT, SECURITY PACIFIC BANK 19 . 00% Interest, Matures 3/16/81 100 ,000 . 00 TIME DEPOSIT, SECURITY PACIFIC BANK 18. 00% Interest, Matures 3/19/81 100,000. 00 TOTAL $10, 028 ,230. 15 CERTIFICATION I, RALPH H. DOWELL, JR. , do hereby certify declare that the demands enumerated and referred to in .the `foregoing register are accurate and just claims against the City and • that there are funds available for payment thereof in the City Treasury. / t. RALPH H. DOWELL, JR. , ERS Finance Director i M L. WARDEN, City Manager 0 DEPOSIT LISTING DECEMBER 1, 1980 TO DECEMBER 31, 1980 TAXES Property Tax $ 1,810 92 Business Inventory Relief 15 ,692 . 33 Sales & Use Tax 98,760. 49 Property Transfer Tax 2,373. 92 LICENSES/PERMITm S 7,716 . 57 FINES/PENALTIES 673 . 15 REVENUE/RENTS 1, 096 . 99 REVENUE/AGENCIES II Vehicle "In Lieu" 34 ,932.52 Cigarette Tax 3,721. 37 Highway Carriers 758 . 94 Dial-A-Ride Farebox 1,131.40 CHARGES FOR CURRENT SERVICES 5, 127 . 23 . GAS TAX 13,264. 78 VEHICLE CODE FINES 2,277 . 56 LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUNDS 135,837.59 RECREATION 954 .60 MISCELLANEOUS 839 . 04 TOTAL $326, 969 . 40 ATASCADERO PAGE NO. l DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 81-061 DATE 12/09/80 PAYEE WARRANT CHECK N0.. /OUC DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTEN DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTCHG'D INV.NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT AmERICArj cRISTOL I`:OIISTRIES ;790 VOID CK 'iP1611 01-4202-258 45.61-P1611 45.61 RTAS FEDERAL CREDIT UP,+IGd 790 CREDIT LINToN DEPOSITS 12/01-2160-005 692, 30 P1759 692,30 ATASCADERO P(')LICE ASSOCIATIG .790 DUES PAYROLL 12/03/50 01-21b0-004 40.00 P1758 40.00 AUTOMATIC ALARMS INC ;749.4 ITEC e, JAIi ALARM SERV 01-4405-226 07428 2.0 .00 3417 20.00 LISA ;-ilEC!iLER '793 2 ;+US ,�A5HES 11/22 05—'x401-224 7710 20.00 3418 20.00 94PPKy r,-'A._,—, r CQ,uFEREriCE MILEAGE 01-4110-203 112180 46. 00 3419 46.00 CAL—TEST PHOTOGRAPHY 'NIAREHOU '793 POLAROID CAIRA 9 FILA 01-4201-303 5344 314.41 3420 314,61 CITY—CO FEU CREDIT UNION =790 CRrDIT UNION DEPOSITS 12/01-2160-005 b2,50 P1760 62.50 GRISANTI hARD,dARF '793 CHARGER & MOD 01-4201-303 04964 5.90 793 RECHARGEA5LE BATTERY 01-4201-303 05104 14.213 793 DRAIi,jS 01-4405-215 05065 18.9E '793 RAZOR BLADES 01-4405-217 Q5.009 1 . 12 =7"93 PLUG AOFT.? & DRAIN CLEA' E01-44!u5-217 u5095 15.89 793 CASTER 01-4405-217 04986 1 ,36 793 }!ASHF_R5 n, LATCHES 01-4405-2.17 04947 3. 15 793 11,ASHEPS 01-4405-217 05027 1 .99 792 SHOP VAC 01-4405-221 05215 52.99 793 i UbBER 800TS & ADAPTER 01-4405-2.21 04999 47 . 39 ATASCADERU PAGE NO. 2 DEMAND/"ARRANT REGISTER NO. 81-061 DATE 12 0 PAYEE WARRANT CHECK VOUCHER NO. DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTEN DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTCHG'D INV.NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT 1793 t PENCH 01-4405-221 05027 3.44 3792 EXTENSION CORD 07-4103-210 05080 1 .36 3421 167 .90 JJ'S AUTO SERVICE 3794 VIPER SNITCH, SENDER UNIT05-4401-224 524 147.34 342" 147 .341 LA4:RENCE R MC PHERSON 3792 MILEAGE 11 /3-11/26 01-4401-203 144.00 3423 144.01? MID-STATE BANK 3AO FED N/H TAX 12/03/80 01-2160-001 060.95 xP1757 5860 .55 MC NAIMARA ELECTRIC 3794 REPLACEMENT HULO 01-4202-215 21379 44 .83 3424 44.83 R03EPT MOORS 5792 5UNKEN GARDEN LAWN 01-4404-301 11 /80 738.00 3425 735.00 . NO CC FIRE PROTECTION 3.794 FILL FIRE EXTING 01-4201-224 10862 31 .49 3426 31 .49 THE OUTLET CO 3794 A35ORTED HAND TOOLS 01-4400-217 317 .36 3427 317 .36 ' CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISP0 3790 2 HUMAN SERVICES DIRECTOR01-4201-234 5.00 P1755 5.00 i SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS 3790 2 BROCHURES OPERATORS LIC01-4251-234 3.00 P1756 3.00 j _.LLIOTT 0 STEPHENSON ;794 PLAN CHECKING 01-4110-224 11130 815.71 342E 816 .71 ; i i I ATASCADERO PAGE NO. 3 IIOEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 81-061 DATE 12/09/80 PAYEE WARRANT CHECK N0.. IUC DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTEN DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTCHG'D INV.NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT SAN LUIS PAINTS 793 PAINT 01-0404-216 04777 37 .66 793 PAII`';T 01-4405-216 04607 41 ,45 3429 79,11 SAKI JOArJUIN SUPPLY CO. 794 CLEAN'ING PnODUCTS 01-4202-211 069025 217,04 791 FLOOR STRIPPER 01-4405-211 069033 58.77 3430 275.81 SENIOR CITIZEN 'S UNITED, INC 792 TRANSPORTATION 01-4301-257 11/60 100 .00 3431 100.00 TEMPLETON FEEL'• & GRAIiv 7`92 ZOO FOOD 01-4404-210 F92806 114.91 3432 114.91 (I-i"110 I OIL CO OF CA 79 fuLL 1—oa' 23-6920 01-4201-219 112680 748.92 7 ' FUEL 1-0623-6920 01-4402-219 112660 139. 15 3433 888,07 sl;tSTERP- OFFICE PRODUCTS INC 792 OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4110-212 16677 19.03 792 OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4114-212 16679 10.56 792 OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4110-212 16394 3.57 3434 33. 16 LEE I ILSON ELECTRIC CO 792 SIGNAL REPAIR 10/2.0/50 02-4402-224 m18646 41 .69 792 SIGIJAL REPAIR 11/13/80 02-4402-224 -Mi18510 50.09 792 Slul''•IAL REPAIR 10/20/80 02-4402-224 02469 194. 18 792 SIG;NIAL REPAIR 11/13/60 02-4402-224 03157 251 .60 3035 537,56 t ATASCADERO PAGE NO. 4 DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. DATE 12/011)0 PAYEE WARRANT CHECK NO... lUUC , DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTEN DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTCHG'D INV.NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT vRITTEN 4€36.86 PREPAID 6618. 14 ACCRUED .00 TOTAL 11455. 00 RECAP SY FUND PRE-PAID IRITTEN FUND 01 6613. 111, 4130.55 FUND 02 .00 537 .56 FUND 05 .00 167 .34 FUND 07 .00 1 .38 • N7 . ATASCADERO PAGE NO. 1 OMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 81 -062 DATE 12/18/80 PAYEE WARRANT CHECK OCHER NO. DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTEN DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTCHG'D INV.NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT ATASCAOERO vEWS 803 PUBLICATION ORD 933 01-4102-247 iN-683 427 ,35 303 PUBLICATION PUBLIC HEARI '01-4110-247 F-720 11 .97 103 PUBLICATION HENRY tj .SNIT 01-4110-247 F-719 11 .97 '503 PU6LICATION GORDON HICHE 01-4110-247 F-717 11.97 103 PUBLICATION R 6 A TODD 01- 4110-247 F-718 11 .97 103 PUBLICATIO'V, PUB HEAR. BA 01-4110-247 F-711 14.91 ;03 PULALICA.TIO-,, SANTA BARS E01-4110-247 F-712 13.02 350 5U3. 16 ATAS MUTUAL 'WATER CO 304 NATER 16-1000 01-4202-232 11208 40.00 3.03 WATER 19-7000 01-4202-232 11208 62.91 �04 NATER 17-45000 01-4404-232 11206 34.59 1041 WATER 18-422000 01-4404-232 11218( 116.99 303 INATER 2-353000 01-4404-232 12028 71 .63 350 •326.11 � ALEKT-O-LITE 341 STREET SIGNS 3 EQUIP 01-4402-217 33762 611 .34 350 611 .34 * COOPERATIVE PERSONNEL SERVI 102 FIRE CAPTAIN TEST BOOTS 01-4102-2'34 6224 168.50 350 168 .50 * CERTIFIED BUILDING INSPECTI ; 302 BLDG INSPT SERVICES 01-4110-224 11/80 775.50 350f 775.50 COAST TO COAST 103 QUARTZ SPACE HEATERS 336901-4405-301 254. 19 3507 254. 19 COMM TRANSIT SERVS, TNC �0'2 �jUS SERVICE 10/20-10/24 OS-4041-224 1851 1615.39 W2 8US SERVICE 10/27-10/31 05-4401-224 1897 1595.93 -.02 BUS SERVICE 11/3 - 11/7 05-4401-224 1910 1684.35 3500 4900 .67 CRYSTAL SPRINGS �IJATER CO 02 ,NATER, BOTTLED 11 /6-11/2001-4102-210 T-100 .16.78 -:02 ;NATER, BOTTLED 11 /6-11/2001-4106-210 T-100 15 .78 a.. 7., a es `� ,.,,n q:� ..n_�+i�,xiC L✓m..z��'S:.s+*s►+Re.�7't.+i+ll.: _ _ .-�,oxt='m`s�''sai'wrrc.:•"�r�r r,.ws-.;.tee ATASCADERO PAGE NO. .2 DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 81-062 DATE 12/10 PAYEE WARRANT CHECK N0. IUC DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTEN DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTCHG'D INV.NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT 302 NATER, BOTTLED 11/6-11/2001-4110-210 T-100 16.78 302 1ATER, BOTTLED 11 /6-11/2001-4201-210 T-100 16.80 302 wATERt BOTTLED 11/6-11 /2001-4401-210 T-100 16.78 302 'NATER, BOTTLED 11 /6-11/2001-4402-210 T-1004 16.75 302 RATER, BOTTLEC 11 /6-11/2007-4108-210 T-100 16.75 3509 117,48 LAUZEL ENTERPRISES 303 BULLDOZER REivTAL 01-4402-309 120250 280.00 303 LOADER RENTAL 01-4402-310 120280 120.0+ 303 DUMP TRUCK RENTAL 01-4402-311 120280 120.00 3510 520.00 = DE COU LUMBER CO 3:0111 PLYV.'OOD & FAILS 01-4402-217 37017 47 .95 3511 47,95 STEVEN J DOUGLASS, P.D. 302 CAGEL — PHYSICAL 01-4201-224 90.00 302 KINGSTON PHYSICAL 01-4405-101 90.00 3512 18 0 - AVIS BODY SHCP 302 REPAIR DOOR K PAINNT 01-4201-215 101931 126.00 3513 126.00 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT 7'96 STATE WITHHOLDING TAX 01-2160.002 NOV'60 2277 .60 P1765 2277.60 ENTENVIANNi-ROVING CC? 8.01 BADGE & CAP PIECE 01-4201-302 08624 56.43 3514 56.43 RICK ELISAPRARAS EYCAVATTON 904 REFUND PERFORMANCE BOND 01-3500-09c 5410 250 .00 501 DUMP TRUCK RENJAL 01-4402-311 80-2614 662,40 3515 912.40 EL Ca.MINO CAR I?4ASH 301 10 CAR 4'VASHES 11/10-11 /2601-4201-215 30.00 3516 30.00 ICHAEL FREDERICK , GEN"L CONT '901 MOTOR GRADER RENTAL 01-4462-309 120260 640.00 ATASCADERO PAGE,NO. -3 OEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 81 -062 DATE 12/18/80 PAYEE WARRANT CHECK N0.. UC DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTEN DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTCHG'D INV.NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT '01 FRUNIT ENO LOADEP RErJAL 01-4402-310 120260 640. 00 301 DUMP TRUCK RE •!T.AL 01-4402-311 120280 662.00 3517 1942.00 ALLEN GRIMES ;01 PROFESSIONIAL SERVICES 01-4103-224 11/80 1800. 00 401 LITIGATION 01-4103-225 11/ 30 ii3o.00 3518 2930 ,00 RISANTI HARDoiARE 101 BRGOM HANDLE 01-4402-210 05128 2.47 `01 AUGERS, PLUMEING 01-4405-216 05138 16.20 `01 SOLDERING GUM 01-4405-216 05132 20.95 x.0,3 SOLDER & RAZOR BLADES 01-4405-221 05132 10.54 3519 50. 16 GEM AUTO PARTS of FLARES 01-4201-242 189 241 .39 3520 241 .89 .UT 'L BUSINESS MACHINES CORE 7bl TRANSPARENCIES 6X00115 01-4110-212 157.41 '81 COPIER RENTAL & COPIES 01-4301-303 120180 912. 17 '99 COFY METER — IBM 3X31366 07-4108-212 26 .50 3521 1096.08 TiNiTERNATIONAL CRYSTAL 10,FG 3101 RADIO CRYSTALS 80111857 05-4401-224 26.80 3522 26.80 x RISER SAND AND GRAVEL 181 ASPHALT 01-4402-217 158154 306.21 F81 ASPHALT 01-4402-217 153134 164. 14 '81 ASPHALT 01-4402-217 152386 963.81 '81 ASPHALT 01-4402-217 154251 147 .86 ,81 ASPHALT 1-4402-217 153135 986 .45 '81 CRUSHED ROCK 01-4402-217 159244 238.88 °81 SAND 1-4404-217 151046 10.28 3523 2821 .63 ONALO L LEIS "81 MILEAGE 11 /3-11 /24 1-4402-203 113080 14.20 3524 14.20 e.+ �mwcy.:. � :F.:4y..z-_,., �...Ww..y..^..:5'�=:3''...r —�;�`'r.- ..fac. .;`.t',`�- gyp; •�-,.3 3 ;: ATASCADERO PAGE NO. 4 DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 81-062 DATE 12/18 PAYEE WARRANT CHECK N0.. JC DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTEN DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTCHG'D INV.NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT JERRY L0ECK - P.ULL0071NG 81 SHOULDER REPAIR 01-4402-309 1549 622.20 81 SHOULDER REPAIR 01-4402-309 1546 40 .00 81 wIDEv EL MMINU REAL 02-4402-224 1547 1823.20 at WIDEN EL CAhINO REAL 02-4402-224 1545 1263.20 81 STREET PATCHING G2-4402-224 1540 3075.65 3525 7024.25 ISSION LINEN SUPPLY 00 BUST MOP 01-4202-211 1888A 2.06 00 DUST MOP 01-4272-211 1895A 2. 17 00 DUST IAOP 01-4202-211 1902A 2.06 00 DUST MOP 01-4202-211 1909A 2. 18 0"I? TOWELS OI-4202-?_ 15 1895A 2.34 0'0 TOWELS 01-4202-215 1909A 2.52 00 COVERALLS 01-4202-242 1888A 4.40 00 COVERALLS 01-4202-242 1895A 4.40 -00 COVERALLS 01-4202-242 19OP-A 4.40 00 COVERALLS 01-4202-242 1909A 4.40 -00 TOAELS 01-4202-250 18886 3.53 • 'G0 TOIvELS (11-4202-250 18956 - 3.53 X00 TOS+ELS 01-4202-250 190213 3.53 !00 T06ELS 01-4202-250 19096 3.53 3526 45.05 OLIVER & NILLIAMS 100 ELEVATOR SERV CnNTfCT 01-4405-224 11/80 61 .25 3527 61 .25 PACIFIC GAS -? ELECTRIC '99 TSRP2-00601-4 STRT LGTS 01-4402-227 113080 1852.86 99 TBRP4-00701-1 PARK LGTS 01-4404-227 113080 55.26 3528 1908. 12 ACIFIC TELEPHONE 199 PHONE 805-466-8000-534-N 01-4102-P28 112080 248.53 '99 PHUNE 805-466-8000-534-I`1 01-4110-228 112060 248.53 99 PHONE 8n5-466-8600-869-N 01-4201-228 112080 202. 19 '99 PHONE 805-466-6600-869�-i\i 01-4202-228 112080 202.20 99 PHONE 220-154-5659-300-NI 01-4202.-22#3 112080 13.50 99 PHUNE 408-096-0528-213-N 01-4202-228 1119x30 27 . 10 99 PHONE 805-466-2141-136-N 1-4202-228 112080. 165.56 99 PHONE 805-466-8000-534-N 1-4401-228 112080 55.23 ATASCADERO PAGE NO. 5 lEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 81-0-62 DATE 12/18/80 Q PAYEE WARRANT CHECK N OUC DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTEN DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTCHG'D INV.NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT 799 PHONE 805-466-9037-360-N 01-4404-228 112080 33,77 799 FHONE 805-466-{1749-320-14 01-4405-228 112080 38.22 799 PHONE 605-466-7433-599-N 05-4401-224 112080 110 ,27 3529 1345. 10 UBLIC EMPLOYEE 'S RETIRE SYS 796 PERS 11 /1-11 /14 PAID 11/101-2160-006 8118.27 P1764 8118.27 PETTY CASH - CITY TRFASURER 796 PETTY CASH 01-4102-206 13,27 796 PETTY CASH 01-4102-206 5.68 7.96 PETTY CASH 01-4106-206 13.27 749,6 PETTY CASH 01-4106-206 13.51 7�96 PETTY CASH 01-4106-210 1114.89 796 PETTY CASH 1-4201-224 5.28 796 PETTY CASH 01-4405-211 3.38 796 PETTY CASH 5-4401-224 3.03 796 PETTY CASH 07-4108-208 .80 P1761 73. 11 OULTRYMENS COOP ASSOC 799 ZOO FOOD 1-4404-210 19150 44.31 3530 44.31 ACIFIC HOME IMPROVE?AE-NT CNT 7.98 ilHEELBARRO4 1-4404-217 208558 80.51 718 QUANTITY DISCOUNT CREDIT 1-4405-217 STMT 14,72- 3531 65.79 D PETERSON 304 1980 CHIP SEAL PROGRAM 02-4402-224 7610 71451 ,03 3532 71451 .03 ED STAR IND SERV 798 UNIFORMS 4958070 1-4402-205 12.75 798 UNIFORMS 5301406 1-4402-205 12.75 798 UNIFORMS 5072383 1-4402-205 12.75 798 UNIFORMS 5166811 1-4402-205 12.75 198 UNIFOROS 4958070 11-4404-205 12.75 798 UNIFORPS 5301406 1-4404-205 12.75 198 UNIFORMS 5072383 1-4404-205 12.75 7,98 UNIFORMS 5186811 1-4404-205 12.75 E..•, .. `.;. at '•z.e.t•.K+aw.-V.u.� :;,sa ..,,,,;._' -. ,.wroti:.Fsa..%�.+.w:afn..,:vaf.asr.;:. 't ..*.r+v�a�iirtr',<� ATASCADERO PAGE NO. 6 DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 81-062 DATE 12/10 PAYEE WARRANT CHECK VOUCHER NO, DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTEN DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CHG'D INV.NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT ;798 UNIFORMS 4953070 01-4405-205 12.35 '798 UNIFORMS 53014,06 01-4405-205 9.35 )798 UNIFORntS 5072383 1-4405-205 8,50 '798 UNIFORMS 5186811 1-4405-205 ?x.50 ,797 IAOP SERVICE 5531252 1-4405-211 20.30 ;797 MOP SERVICE 5639404 1-4405-211 20.303533 181 .30 STUART ROSS ;798 141LEAGE 10-24/12-2 07-4108-203 120480 70.00 3534 70.00 CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO 17`96 CCCJPA MEDICAL PAYMENT 01-2160-003 EC '80 4463,70 P1762 4463070 EPT OF TECH SERVICES ;797 COiviM EQUIP INSTALL 01-4201-229 STIVIT 3040.00 3535 3040.00 DONALD J SYLVIA • 1797 CONFERENCE 12/5/80 01-4202-206 120830 8.50 1)797- CONFERENCE 12/5/80 01-4202-215 12.0880 23.00 3536 31x50 SANTA MARIA TIRE CO X797 REPAIR FLAT TIRE 01-4404-215 39370 5.00 3537 5.00 AN LUIS OBISPO CC ENGINEER 1797 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINT P9702-4402-224 323.39 3538 323.39 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY GARAr, ;797 INSTALL E'SERG EQUIP 01-4201-224 3f?4135 404.91 =797 INSTALL EMERG EQUIP 01-4201-224 364136 1041 .00 ,797 HA CTERIES 01-4201-224 334229 2943539 1740,48 SANTA LUCIA SPORTSMEN 'S ASSu ;797 RANGE-USE FEES 1 YR 01-4201-214 STMT 300.00 3540 300.00 vESTERNI OFFICE PRODUCTS INC ;797 FOLDERS, PRIi4TOUT 01-4201-212 17027 8.00 ATASCADERO PAGE NO. 7 WIVIAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 81-062 DATE 12/18/80 PAYEE WARRANT CHECK .00HER DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTEN N0. DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTCHG'D INV.NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT '97 DESK LAMP 01-4201-303 17027 41 .56 '97 FILE CABINET 07-4108-302 16816 172,68 3541 222.24 EE WILSOIv ELECTRIC CO '97 REPAIR SIGNAL CONTROLLER 05-4402-224 27887 136.25 3542 . 138,25 .* ALL AUTO BODY 303 REPAIR DOOR ZOO TRUCK 01-4404-215 001737 467 .28 3543 487.28 * MALL SCALE INASTF MGMT PROJE PUBLICATIONS 01-4401-209 21 . 15 P1763 -21 . 15 * CHARLES PIERCE 304 REFUND BLDG PERMIT CONST 01-3200-020 275 250.20 iO4 REFUND BLDG FFRMIT PLBG 1-3200-030 275 63,00 "IREFUND BLDG PERMIT ELECT 01-32U0-040 275 53.69 30 REFUND BLDG PERMIT DRIVEv;01-3200-050 275 15.00 304 REFUND BLDG PERMIT ISSUA1101-3200-15A 75 11 ,00 304 REFUND SLr)G PERMIT PLAN COI-3600-030 75 62.55 304 REFUND BLDG PERMIT EARTH( I-3600-100 275 4.93 3544 460.37 � i ATASCADERO PAGE NO. 8 DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 81.-062 DATE 12/1 Q PAYEE WARRANT CHECK N 7UC DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTEN DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTCHG'D INV.NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT YRITTEN 107597 .20 'REPAID 14953.83 .ACCRUED ,00 'OTAL 122551 .03 RECAP BY FUI%-D 'RE-PAID WRITTEN FUND 01 14950.00 24198,78 FUND 02 .00 77936.47 FUND 05 3,03 5175.99 FUND 07 .80 285.96 i ATASCADERO PAGE NO. 1 I&EMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 81-063 DATE 12/19/80 PAYEE WARRANT CHECK NO.OUC DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTEN DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTCHG'D INV.NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT ATASCADERO FORD .809 PARTS 01-4201.215 16786 12.89 809 REPAIR CARB 01-4201-215 12034 37.50 809 REPLACE GRILL 01-4201-215 8766 165.93 809 REPAIR BRAKES 01-4201-215 12120 224.54 809 WHEELALIGNMENT 95 01-4201-223 12006 28950 809 WHEELS 01-4201-223 17461 61 .05 809 LEASE PAYMENT-CARS 01-4201-224 12/80 2989.62 354 3520603 ATAS SUPER MARKET 810 FINAL PAYMENT ON ACCT 01-4202-258 STMT 139.94 P1767 139.94 ATAS FEDERAL CREDIT UNION '810 CREDIT UNION DEPOSIT 01-2160-005 692.30 P177 692.30 ATASCADERO POLICE ASSOCIATIO 81 POLICE ASSOC DUES 01-2160-004 42.50 P1775 42.50 AMFAC MEC SUPPLY 809 REPAIR PARTS 01-4402-217 04997 137.07 3546 137.07 ATASCADERO JAYCEES 109 ELECTRICAL SUNKEN GARDEN 01-4405-217 1000.00 3547 . 1000.00 .COAST -TO COAST 809 DESK CALCULATOR 01-4401-212 379249 52.87 3548 52.87 CITY-CO FED CREDIT UNION 8:10 CREDIT UNION DEPOSIT 01-2160-005 62.50 P1772 62050 CALIF CORRECTIONAL INDUSTRIE 809 HELMET LINERS 01-4202-242 000174 87.45 3549 87 .45 RALPH H DOWELL JR 810 MILEAGE 12/10-12/12 01-4106-203 54.40 ra."Yi.:'' — 3r..+r3ucvaaw.w.+a 3.�H:w.'..-iwv,..rt....,r. �.t,..ia;ita .1 ,�xk\..'.w�.y�e-19tff2tl e?�W..i.i.K Swti:�'#.i�r+h's.Aqua-b.4`*•.:v6$iFy}.ei.. ATASCADERO PAGE NO. 2 DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 81-063 DATE 12/10 ' PAYEE WARRANT CHECK NO. IUG DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTEN DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTCHG'D INV.NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT -310 CONFERENCE 12/10-12/12 01-4106-206 160.52 P1769 °214.92 Y DE COU LUMBER CO 308 WOOD & CHAIR GLIDES 01-4202-216 37217 6,01 355 6,01 308 18" CULVERT 01-4402-217 163.45 308 PIPE BANDS & ELBOWS 01-4442-217 000121 120. 13 309 PIPE & COLLARS 01-4402-217 4175537 .86 3551 821 .44 RICK ELISARRARAS EXCAVATION 3:08 BACKHOE RENTAL 01-4402-310 80-273 581 .'20 355 ;5810'20 FOLKINS & FOLKINS INC 308 OIL 01-4202-220 17714 215.78 3553 215.78 GEM AUTO PARTS 908 DRAIN & BATTERY TESTER 01-4202-215 8955 7.55 808 OIL 01-4202-215 9221 16.79 355 24.34 INT'L CONFERENCE OF BUILDING 3.10 COPY OF MECH CODE 01-4110-209 12.72 P1777 12.72' : JJ`S AUTO SERVICE . 808 REPLACE FRONT & BACK BRAK05-4441-224 537 548.53 3555 548.53 J/D PET FOOD 8-08 ZOO FOOD, MEAT 01-4404-210 6545 440.96 3556 440.96 MID-STATE BANK 808 POLICE COMM EQUIP PMT 01-4201-224 064816 1490.84 3557 1490.84 ID-STATE BANK - 310 FED TAX WHTHHOLDING 01-2160-001 6306.63 P1774 6306.63 ATASCADERO PAGE NO. 3 DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 81-063 _ DATE 12/19/80 PAYEE WARRANT CHECK N0.. OUC DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTEN DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTCHG'D INV.NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT MC NAMARA ELECTRIC 808 ELECTRICAL ADAPTERS 01-4202-210 21493 21 .91 3558 21 .91 LOUISE MOON SECRETARIAL. SVC 809 STENCIL CUTTING 07-4108-209 31 7.42 3559 7.42 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 807 ELECT JBR47-25202-8 01-4201-227 121080 .25,32 ;507 ELECT FBR 88-23402-0 01-4404-227 120680 3,34 '81"7 ELECT FBR88-24203-8 01-4404-227 120680 28b,87 8`107 ELECT FBR51-00302-0 01-4404-227 120680 1 .75 807 ELECT HBR38-08406-9 01-4404.227 120980 3. 14 807 ELECT HBR38-00202-7 01-4405-227 120980 605.49 807 ELECT HBR38-00602-3 01-4405-227 120980 119.51 3560 1045.42 al PACIFIC TELEPHONE 807 PHONE 238-451-8031-877-N 01-4201-228 120780 15.00 807 PHONE 238-451-8032-141-N 01-4201-228 120780 .15.00 807 PHONE 238-451-8034-176-N 01-4201-228 120780 15.00 809 PHONE 238-451-8033-201-N 01-4202-228 15.00 807 PHONE 238-451-8138.830-N' 05-4401-224 120780 15.00 3561 75,00 PITNEY BOWES 807 POSTAGE METER RENTAL: 01-4106-303 895702 47 .70 3562 47070 ROTO-ROOTER SERVICE 807 ATAS LAKE DRAIN CLEAN 01-4404-226 033 33.00 3563 33.00 UNNING STUDIO : INC 8-09 PAPER, CUTTING & SCORING 07-4108-209 2581 93.75 3564 93.75 SO CA GAS CO 806 GAS 07-4978-976-3201-5 1101-4202.230 168.00 806 GAS 09-4982-235-0053-6 1101-4404-230 29. 15 ATASCADERO PAGENO. 4 DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 81-063 DATE 12/100 PAYEE WARRANT CHECK OUC N0.. DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTEN DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTCHG'D INV.NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT ;807 GAS 09-4982-235-0153-4 1101-4404-230 . 15,65 807 GAS 07-4978-972-7502-1 1101-4405-230 1274,94 356 1487,74 F L SAURET INC 806 FUEL 01-4202-219 33340 523.71 3566 1523.71 'TRANSCONTINENTAL SALES CO 806 1 PAIR BOOTS 01.4202 .205 10421 79,91 -3567 79,91 U S POST OFFICE 38110 POSTAGE 01-4102-204 120,00 AID POSTAGE 01-4110-204 80.00 x'1771 200,00 WESTERN OFFICE PRODUCTS INC ;806 OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4106-212 16977 14.50 '806 OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4106-212 17091 38,03 • ,806 OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4106-212 16676 61 .72 '806 OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4106.212 16979 90. 12 ;806 OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4202.212 16948 16.92 ;806 OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4202 .212 16657 22.70 >806 OFFICE SUPPLIES 07-4108-212 16993 4974 ►806 OFFICE SUPPLIES 07--4108-212 16979 1 . 19 356 ;249,92 MURRAY ..L .WARDEN .810 CONFERENCE-►MILEAGE 12/9.101-4102-203 54.40 ;810 CONFERENCE 12/9-12/12 01-4102-206 223.28 P176 :277.68 WIL-MAR DISPOSAL CO INC x806 TRASH PICK-UP 01-4404-231 12/80 142.00 ;806 TRASH PICK-UP 01-4405-231 12/80 40.50 3569 182.50 NICHOLAS & JUDITH VENUTE - ;806 REFUND PREFORM BOND 01-3200-020 2804 '250.00 3570 :250.00 'THOMAS MC NARY ;808 REFUND CERT OF COMPLIANCE1101-3600-020 5831 220.00 3571 220.00 ATASCADERO PAGE NO. g WMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 81.063 DATE 12/19/80 PAYEE WARRANT CHECK OCHER NO. DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTEN DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CHG'D INV.NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT J E BARO 308 REFUND WEED ABATE CHARGE 01.4202-249 54,00 1572 54,00 C F- & A D DAVIS '308 REFUND WEED ABATE CHARGE 01-4202-249 54,00 3573 54,00 * P L= & D E BURKHARDT 308 REFUND WEED ABATE 'CHARGE01.4202.249 54,00 357 54,00 * ATASCADERO PAGE NO. 6 DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 81-063 DATE 12/190 PAYEE WARRANT CHECK ]OCHER NO. DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTEN DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTCHG'D INV.NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT WRITTEN !3446:50 PREPAID 7949.19 'ACCRUED ,04 TOTAL :21355.69 RECAP BY FUND 'PRE-PAID WRITTEN FUND 01 7949, 19 12735.87 FUND 05 .00 563,53 FUND 07 .00 107.10 ATASCADERU PAGE NO. 1 WMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 81-064 DATE 12/31/60 Q PAYEE WARRANT CHECK N UC DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTEN DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTCHG'D INV.NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT ATASC.ADERO SANITATIO`' 314 SFFF 11 /1 /80-1 /1/81 001 -01-4202-231 20.00 3640 20.00 } DEBORAH BENTLEY 416 MILEAGE 12/P. - 12/19 07-4108-203 122280 36.00 3641 36.00 x MICrAAEL P. CURRAN, M.P. '.16 X-kAYS - LOPEZ 9465 02-44OR-101 18137 44.00 3642 44.00 CHEVRU^I 3,1+ FUEL 79P-060-064-5 01-42.02-219 121980 117 .48 3643 117 .48 COMM TRAMSTT SE SVS, INC 116 DIAL-A-RIDE SERV 11-10/1105-4401.-224 192? 1603.71 116 DIAL-A-PIPE SERV 11-17/1105-4401-224 1923 1654.31 3644 3258.02 CALIF SOCIETY OF imUNICTPAL 313 MEHRE93HIO - R DOW-ELL 01-4106-202 35.00 P1783 35.00 ALEXVJDEP GRAvT & CO "16 COMPUTED SERVICE 1.2/80 01-4301-239 01078 551 .39 3645 '551 .39 GEN' AUTO PARTS 111'6 REPAIR PARTS 01-4201-303 1114 123.38 3646 123.38 IWT 'L BUSINESS i•AACHINIES CORP t'15 ME ,,iORY TYPE,'!BITER 12/2 - 01-4102-302 619182 ?70.87 ;:15 RIJROlJS N CGRP FILM 01-4106-21P X78898 133.69 '`.15 TYPEJPITFP 1 /91 - 3/81 01-4201-301 535539 122.44 X15 TYPF4:t?ITEP 1/81 - 3/81 07-410N-303 535539 120 .?0 115 TYPFARITEP 12/8 - 1 /81 07-4108-703 P33151 63 .60 3647 710.80 INT 'L CITY MANAGEMENT ASSOC 13 PIJB!ICATIOw 01-4102-234 14.50 P1779 14 .50 * ATASCADERO PAGE NO. 2 DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 81-0611 DATE 12/300 PAYEE WARRANT CHECK OUCHER DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTEN NO. DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CHG'D INV.NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT THE IPO(i ilAi� 815 RF_FL ACEME?IT PANTS 01-4201 -302 2998 45.05 815 I1I`JIFOPNlS CAGLE 01-420t-302 2998 265,64 3648 310.69 J.J. 'S AUTInIOTIVE 815 )IAL-A-RICE VAN SERVICE 05-4401-224 553 24.94 815 D14L-A-FIDE 6113 BRAKES 05-4401-2211 551 273.51 3649 '298.45 KAISER SAidn AND GRAVEL 8115 ASPHALT 01-4402-217 160972 367.46 3650 367 .46 H L LA PRAPE 815 PARKING LOT RENT 01-4301-254 500.00 3651 500.00 MID-STATE RANK 815 REFUND CLEANING 'DFPDSIT 01-3400-010 5445 200.00 814 DIAL-A-?-Int VAN 05-4401-224 064394 351.97 814 DIAL-A-PIDE BUSES 05-4401-224064121 1107 .32 3652 1658.29 MOBIL OIL CREDTT CARP 8.15 FUEL 883-930-756-1 01-4110-219 12/80 13.60 `815 FUEL A83-`Q30-756-1 01-4201-219 12/190 9?.60 815 FUEL 883-930-756-1. 05-4401-224 12/80 754.56 365 860.76 PACIFIC GAS ° FLFCTRTC 814 ELECTRIC H3R38-1.0601-4 01-4202-220 1?09d0 164.66 3654 164.66 PACIFIC TEL_PHDI'JF 814 PHONE 2.20-154-4Q63-554-u 01-4202-228 1P1180 13.50 814 PHDmE 224-154-5659-300-;U 01-4202-228 121180 27 .00 3655 40.50 URLIC EMPLOYER 'S PFTIgE 'SYS 813 RETTE<EvlFr\;T CONITRIR P/R 1101-2160-006 8167 .56 P1782 8ib7 .66 ATASCAOERi) PAGE NO. 3 OE MAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 81-0614 DATE 12/31/80 PAYEE WARRANT CHECK OUCHER DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTEN N0. DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CHG'D INV.NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT F I`iO9T0,N PITT CO .514 GU,,.' LOCKER 01-4201-242 69733 211 .95 3656 211 .95 N O PETEPSOd; 814 STEEL & ROD 01-4202-215 03790 14.58 3657 14.58 PFRRY R RING INIC 814 3LuG RENOVATION DESIGNS 01-4405-301 801241 1389.00 3658 1389.00 ROGERS CONCRFTF PUMPING SVC ,.814 DU.'-IP TRUCK RE„TAL 01-4402-311 112080 188.90 3659 188.90 RICN.ARDS SFPVIr,E & SUPPLY CC 8 SHARPEN CNAIrd SAvM BLADE 01-4402-215 IP-636 7 .00 3660 7 .00 STATE COIMPE;NRATIO;ti INS FIM11) 813 C07`0 TiJS FIRE DEPT 7/79-701-4?02-25P 7995.89 P1781 7995.89 U S POST OFFICE 813 1 YP BOX 747 RENT 01-4102-204 BOX747 13.20 8.13 1 YR PDX 747 RENT 01-4110-204 SOX747 8.80 P1780 22.00 WESTERIN OFFICE POOOUCTS INC 814 OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4106-212. 17328 70.83 814 OFFICE SU"PLIES 01-4106-212 17345 29.23 Rlu OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4106-212 17082 25.76 3661 67.36 MURRAY L v ARnEN 8111 CAIR, ALLOrJAi,ICE 01-4102-201 1-81 150.00 3662 150.00 SOUELLA. DFL RTO 816 REFUND CLFANING DEPOSIT 01-3400-020 51435 200 .00 3663 200.00 ATASCADEQ0 PAGE NO. 4 DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 91-064 DATE 12140 PAYEE WARRANT CHECK N0.. OUC DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTEN DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CHG'D INV.NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT NRITTEN 11290.67 PREPAID 16235.05 ACCRUED .00 TOTAL 27525.72 RECAP BY FIINID PRE-PAID WRITTEN, FUNIID 01 16235.05 5257 .55 FUND 02 .00 44.00 FUND 05 .00 5769.32 FUND 07 .00 219.80 ATASCu11ERJ PAGE NO. 1 DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 81-065 DATE 12/31/80 PAYEE WARRANT CHECK N0.. OUC DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTEN DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CHG'D INV.NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT 821 AID RC;\ L? ►-,EAT -? 01-4111-247 e -724 11 .97 821 AD VERA he:.iD 01-4110-247 tv-725 13.02 ,t12l A0 JACK STIPC'-tFIELD Ul-4110-247 ti`-7 2 6 10. 08 3661 35.07 ATASCADEP,l 5 ' IT.ATIU-, A21 SE,} F_? 0 - ,r;n,A-00 11/80- 01-4405-231 5.50 366c- 5.50 LISA tlL,EC'HLE ;820 bU6 05-4401-224 7711 20.00 3666 20.00 CHEVROP,; 821 GASOLI,^�;E 792-060-065-2 01-4201-219 .121966 244.86 821 GASOLI^'E 7'?2--' 0-06.-2 05-4401-224 121960 285. 54 366 530.40 80EXXON CL) 1,.!";A GASCLI .t 1 ;=a-X051-A69-9 01-4202-219 12/80 20 . 19 366e 20. 19 RICK cLr` aPl:•;wa. EXCAVATIO' 820 6AC0OF -Fiv, f ,�L 01-4402-310 80-281 700. 00 820 DLI-1P T.,I%UC�: .;r;,TAL 01-4402-311 80-2131 200 .00 3669 900.00 FIFES 1Ci,,(: STG-FS 820 TIi<E%b 05-4401-224 010841 204.88 820 TIMES 05-4401-224 01x688 102.44 3670 307 .32 R18 PF 3 i S ,10 L ';L'P V I C E 3 01-4103-224 12/30 1800.00 P1787 1800 .00 LEA6IJE OF CALTFCR:,lT ; CITIES 817 CG FE"F ;CE. 01-4102-206 65. 00 817 CC •FFW;::',' Oi-4106-206 65.00 P1786 130.00 LUCKY . tiT 1-q 820 1=IL°, R FL 4SF�ATTF�IES 01-4202-222 16.47 3671 16.47 ATASCADE.-O PAGE NO. 2 DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 61-065 DATE 12/3'0 PAYEE OUCHER WARRANT CHECK NO. DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTEN DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CHG'D INV.NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT 818 FEUD .�:ITHtiOLDT:, G PAYROLL 01 -2160-001 123130 5707,65 P178e 5707„65 ' V-R. CHIC!. F'P! ..:T 820 LAN. Is''IATE I .D. CAt-?o01-4106-212 122880 13.78 3672 13,78 PETTY C; So CITY TREASURER g17 PETTY CASH r7kEYHOU 1) 01-4106-204 3.55 817 PETTY CAS14 - GREYHOU-D 01-4106-204 3.55 8.17 PETTY CASH! - REYHCjN0 01-4106-2o4 3.55 ;;'171PETTY CA.S4 SUPPLIES 01-4106-210 4.74 317 PETTY CASH - CONFE-REidCE t11-4201-206 8.50 R17 PETTY CASH - HATTEPIES 01-4201.-210 3. 18 317 PETTY CASH 'A'IPE 01-4201-215 2.72 X17 PETTY CASH - PASOLINE 01-4201-219 12.00 517 PETTY CASH - f-":SGLI^.;E 01-4201-219 26.25 817 PETTY CASI-: - C0FERENICF_ 01-4202-206 1,1,0 817 PETTY CASH - Ra'pAI+:),s 01-21401-224 2.53 P1784 80.57 PETE J H aG'; tC;,r VP OLET X20 RPL LIGHT 7;'r_*PAI '• PEtR 01-4402-215 41607 53.05 367 53.05 H D PETERBCre 3'18 F'11',:AL ; AYr.4lriIT CHIP SEAL 02-4402-224 60-15 7939,00 P1769 7939.00 n C 8 1:;%;f, 420 E1`4C00E IrdSTALL 01-4202-215 07864 98.39 ,20 01-4202-229 47664 200.00 3674 298.39 t TAYLOm' RE.JAL CENTER 120 RF11TAL bC— I? 'Y C,IT 01-4402-217 010882 53.76 3675 53,76 1 R(,-P-E.P f J VTL4 f'Sp J!R 120 CO: FE_RtJ,;Cc "-.ILEAGF 01-4101-206 122980 64.80 3676 64 .80 ATASCAIEPC', PAGE NO. 3 ODE MAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 81 -065 DATE 12/31/80 PAYEE WARRANT CHECK N0.. DUC DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTEN DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CHG'D INV.NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT ,.,;:1LTE5E F ,lT gPRjSES Ii�C 820 HAZ,%F 7-lCtI.ii `-IATPR 1-400K 01-4202-234 019 5.54 3677 5,54' 1 HOLIDAY I''" -- i,GLUk GATE,,-!Ay 817 CO'•;FEPi,iCt- 01-4102-206 43.00 ` 817 C01\-FFcY` CE 01-4106-206 43. 00 P1785 86.00 - 990 NET PAYROLL 12/03/80 27440. 70 3320— 27440. 701 3382 X9`90 NET PAYROLL 12/17/80 29086 . 33 3436— 29086 . 33 ' 3501 I 990 NET PAYROLL 12/31/80 28943. 40 575 28943 . 40 ; 639 • 1 I r i ATASCADERO PAGE NO. 4 DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 81-065 DATE 12/3100 PAYEE WARRANT CHECK LICHER NO. DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTEN DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTCHG'D INV.NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT ','•'BITTEN 2324.27 PREPAID 101213 .65 ACCRUED .00 TOTAL 103537. 92 ;rCAP DY FII •:►D PRE-PAID WRITTEN FUND 01 93274. 65 1711 .41 FU',jD 02 7939.00 ,00 Fi?£�D 05 .00 612.86 • PAYABLES LISTING . DECEMBER 1, 1980 TO DECEMBER 31, 1980 • TIME DEPOSIT CHECK, SECURITY PACIFIC BANK $100,000. 00 OVERTIME PAYROLL ADVANCE 45 . 90 TOTAL $100, 045.90 • L RESOLUTION NO. 1-81 RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING FEES FOR BICYCLE LICENSES WHEREAS, Section 4-3 .1003 of the Atascadero Municipal Code provides that the City Council; shall establish a fee for licensing of bicycles. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Atascadero City Council hereby establishes bicycle license fees at $2 . 25 for the initial license and $1. 25 for annual renewal. On motion by Councilman and seconded by Councilman the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following vote: . AYES : NOES : ABSENT: ROBERT J. WILKINS, JR. , Mayor ATTEST: MURRAY L. WARDEN, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: • ALLEN GRIMES, City Attorney M E M O RAN D U M TO: CITY MANAGER January 7, 1981 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT LA 801113: 1 LOCATION: 8400 San Rafael Road APPLICANT: John and Jackie Hutcherson REQUEST: To adjust an existing lot line to increase one parcel from 1.8 to 2. 1 acres and decrease the other from 1.9 to 1. 7 acres. On January 5, 1981, the Planning Commission reviewed the proposed lot line adjustment unanimously adopting Findings ' 1-2 and approv- ing Lot Line Adjustment LA 801113: 1 subject to Conditions 1-3 as listed in the attached Staff Report. No one else appeared on the matter. • LAWRENCE ST NS Z RAY ARDEN Planning Di ector C/Lty M nager /Ps i { CITY OF ATASCADERO Fri.-` Planning Department January 5, 1980 • 1918G nri 11979 G C. --I E Rd/ STAFF REPORT i SUBJECT .m. Lot Line Adjustment LA801113 : 1 LOCATION: 8400 San Rafael Road APPLICANT: John C. and Jackie Hutcherson REQUFST: To adjust existing lot 'lines to increase Parcel A from 1. 833 to 2. 103 acres and decrease lot from 1. 892 to 1. 692 acres. BACKGROUND 1. Existing Zoning: A-1-22. 2. General Plan: Suburban Single-Family Residential. 3. Environmental Determination: The Planning Director has deter- mined the application as presented to be a Class 5 (a) Categorical• Exemption and the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report is not necessary. 4. Site Conditions: The subject property is generally flat. Par- cel _A is presently developed with a single family dwelling and barn with induced landscaping. Access to this parcel is via a private driveway off San Rafael. Lot 32 is presently vacant; vegetation consists of natural grasses. Access to this parcel would be from Los Osos Road. At present both parcels are in- consistent with the minimum lot size established in the 19€ 0 Atascadero General Plan. 5. Project Description: The applicant proposes to adjust the property line between Parcel A of CO 76-446 and lot 32 of Block 32. This would result in an increase in Parcel A from 1. 833 to 2. 103 acres and a decrease in Lot 32 from 1 . 962 to 1. 692 acres. The primary reason stated for the adjustment is to allow three horses on the developed lot. STAFF COM1`1ENTS On Thursday, December 4, 1980the Subdivision Review Board met to review this request with the applicant, John Hutcherson. Also attending the meeting were : Lawrence Stevens, Planning Director • Mary Beatie,-Associate Planner; Larry McPherson, Public works Director; John Y.ennaly, Assistant Civil Fngineer; Leslie Cannon, Planning Commissioner. 20 -74-2-5 2 75,X22 F - — G0� 28 �•� _ `fir 6 � _•., _ V, (A 29 VON 30 20 31 - —A �p — _ V_ - - P� 32 — s A. " 22 3I 12- 30 _ 23 PARC ( PAR. B i 3DB l 4 vy 13A--:-1 B� 60 _ 3 24 \ p PAR. PAR.8 2 8 18 76. 8 PARA - IS J� �10 17 Z7' - r - ool 2 rz AL 7 '- '' rte•S ti. -_� _ - - •- VIGiA11.71 MAP 791!/N6r AP N N 4735L rA A H 104- a y6t 3gH1�/� , AC' N71srnc z33 N �6 th tq - 2 � w � v -s nFrS a q t n"J 0 16 O r p � 2 piit _ N ~ 0 0 Staff Report: Lot Line Adjustment LA801113 : 1 • January 5, 1981 Page Two The items discussed at that meeting included the .following areas of concern: 1) San Rafael and Los Osos Roads are not within the City maintained street system. 2) Present improvements of Los Osos Road may not be consistent with actual right-of-way. 3) Property improvements, including fence-lines, should not en- croach on road right-of-ways. 4) Lot line adjustment is exempt from requirements of California Environmental Quality Act. FINDINGS 1. The applicant as presented has been determined to be Categori- cally Exempt from the requirements of CEQA as defined by Class 5 (a) . • 2. The application as presented conforms with the applicable zoning regulations. RECOMMENDATION Based on the above findings, the Planning Department recommends approval subject to the following conditions : 1) The approval of this lot line adjustment as shown on the attach- ment provided herein shall be submitted in a Final Map format to be approved by the Planning Department prior to recordation by the County Recorder' s Office. 2) Any tree removal on site grading necessary for the development of the lots shall be subject to Planning Department approval prior to issuance of a building permit. This requirement shall appear as a note on the Final Map. 3) Approval of this Lot Line Adjustment shall expire one year from the date of final approval unless a time extension has been granted pursuant to a written request prior to the expiration date. • Staff Report: Lot Line Adjustment LA801113: 1 January 5, 1981 Page Three ACTION The Planning Commission should by motion direct Staff as deemed appropriate. TO APPROVE: Motion to adopt findings and set conditions. TO DENY: Potion setting findings for denial. REPORT PREPARED BY: MARY . BEATIE Ass ocKate' Planner • REPORT APPROVED BY IRENCE STEVENS P anning Director /Ps • • 07 _M_E M_O_R A_N_D_U M_: ---- - TO: CITY MANAGER January 7, 1981 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: PARCEL MAP AT 80-57 � LOCATION: 9100 Pino Solo (Lot 3 of A.D.S. Addition #1) APPLICANT: Loyd Sims (Baumberger) REQUEST: To divide a 2 .0 acre site into two parcels of 1.0 acres each. On January 5 , 1981, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing unanimously adopting Findings 1-2, approving a Conditional Negative Declaration, and approving Parcel Map AT 80-57 subject to Conditions 1-8 as listed in the Staff Report. This matter had been continued from two prior meetings to allow • additional consideration of access requirements. Initially, the applicant proposed to use Gusta as access to Parcel B objecting to providing an easement through Parcel A. Approval was, however, granted requiring access from Pino Solo through Parcel A or via the extension of an existing easement on the adjacent property. The applicant has obtained a verbal agreement for the latter. Reasons to support the Commission recommendation are listed. Mr. Baumberger, applicant' s engineer, appeared on behalf of the applicant and indicated concurrence with the recommendation. No one else appeared on the matter. /a44-� E-AIRENCE S&EVENS MURAY ARDEN Planning Director City pager /Ps • M E M O R A N D U M TO: PLANNING COMMISSION January 5 , 1981 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: PARCEL MAP AT 80-57 On December 15, 1980 the Planning Commission considered this application and continued the matter to allow the applicant additional time to work out easement arrangements with the adjacent property owner. Subsequently, staff has met with the applicant and his engineer at which time it was indica- ted that a verbal agreement has been made with the adjacent owner to access the rear lot of the proposed division via the extension of an existing easement. This is the applicant' s preference and is consistent with conditions listed in the Staff Report. The conditions, as recommended, would also allow an access easement across the applicant' s front lot if the verbal agreement is not realized, but would preclude Gusta access without future Plan- ning Commission action. • LAWRENCE STEYYNS Planning Dir for CITY OF ATASCADERO . c RFP _'11!1. r' . ..m Planning Department January 5, 1981 1918 j Ir 1979 \A' 5� oj STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: Parcel Map AT 80-57 LOCATION: 9100 Pino Solo (Lot 3 of A.D.S. Addition #1) APPLICANT: Loyd Sims (Baumberger) REQUEST: To divide a 2. 0 acre site into two parcels of 1.0 acres each. BACKGROUND 1. Existing Zoning: R-A (Suburban District) 2. General Plan: Moderate Density-Single Family Residential 3 . Environmental Determination: An environmental description • form has been completed. The Planning Director has prepared a Draft Conditional Negative Declaration for the project indicating that no significant environmental effects are likely to occur if the project is implemented as proposed. 4 . Site Conditions: The 2. O acre site is presently developed with one single family dwelling near Pino Solo. Vegetation consists of natural fortis and grasses, one pine tree, and approximately 20 oak trees ranging in size from 10 inches to 42 inches in diameter. Topography is basically gently' rolling with site elevations ranging from 508 feet near the northeast and northwest corners of the lot to 524 feet near the center of proposed Parcel A. A local drainage swale crosses the rear (northwesterly) corner of the site. Gas, water and sewer lines are located in Pino Solo Avenue , a 50 foot right-of-way which serves the lot and the existing dwelling. The site is bordered on the north and south by single-family dwellings; om the west by a 16 foot paper alley- way, undeveloped property, Gusta Avenue and an excavating business beyond; and to the east by single family dwellings and the Atascadero Regional Golf Course beyond. 5. Project Description: The applicant proposes to divide the sub- ject property into two parcels; Parcel A which would encompass the existing single family dwelling, is 1. 0 acre , and Parcel • B is also at 1 . 0 acre Access to Parcel P_ is by an existing driveway off Pino Solo. Access to Parcel B is not indicated, but could possibly be assumed to be off Gusta Street which borders the northwest corner of the property. Page Two Staff Report: Parcel Map AT 80-57 STAFF COMMENTS 1. On Tuesday, October 21, 1980 the Subdivision Review Board met to review this request with the applicant's representative. In attendance at the meeting were: Thomas Baumberger, Regis- tered Civil Engineer as applicant' s representative; Larry Stevens, Planning Director; Mary Beatie, Associate Planner; Larry McPherson, Public Works Directpr; John Kennaly, Assistant Civil Engineer; Mike Shubin, Police Department; and Shirley Summers, Planning Commissioner. The items discussed at that meeting included the following areas of concern: - 1) Access to Parcel B off Pino Solo, not Gusta. 2) Parcel B to be labeled as 1. 00 acre. 3) All-weather surfaced access easement to be a minimum of 12 feet in width. 4) Setting monuments at new property corners . 5) 300 foot radius listing of property owners with addressed labels. 6) Tree removal and grading subject to Planning Department approval at time of building permit. 7) Consideration of possible drainage problem. 8) Possible abandonment of paper alley and Gusta. 9) Negative Declaration. 2. The Planning Commission at its meeting of November 17, 1980 referred the matter back to the S.R.B. for review of the access to Parcel B. On December 4, 1980, the applicant, Loyd Sims, met with the S.R.B. to consider alternate locations for the access to Parcel B. Three alternatives were discussed including an easement across Parcel A, an easement through the adjacent property on Pino Solo, and access from Gusta. The items discussed at the meeting included: 1) Gusta Road as presently improved appears not to follow alignment as indicated on maps. For the most part, im- provements appear to be on H.D. Peterson' s lot. 2) Gusta Road is not within the City maintained street systema 3) Residential frontage and access would not be appropriate or _ desirable from Gusta which is primarily fronted by commer- cial property. 4) If access from Gusta is insisted upon, road and drainage improvements would be required. • 5) Pino Solo would provide more logical and reasonable access to rear lot. • Page Three Staff Report: Parcel Map AT 80-57 It was the concensus of the S.R.B. that access from Pino Solo was the most appropriate since Gusta was a commercial area, since it could be blocked to Parcel B ' s disadvantage, since the current improvements did not appear to follow the paper road alignment, since the current improvements were not adequate nor in compliance with City standards, and since the applicant appeared unwilling to provide the improvements that would be required. FINDINGS 1. The application as presented will not have a significant effect upon the environment and the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report is not necessary. 2. The application as submitted conforms- to -the applicable zoning regulations and is consistent with the 1980 Atascadero General Plan. RECOMMENDATION Based on the above findings, the Planning Department recommends : A) Issuance of a Conditional Negative Declaration as follows : 1. Adequate provisions shall be made for drainage control and protection in conjunction with site development. B) Approval of the Tentative Map subject to the following conditions : 1. Sewage disposal shall be by connection to the community sewer and a Note so stating shall appear on the Final Map. 2. Water shall be obtained from the Atascadero Mutual Mater Company and water operable facilities shall exist at the property frontages prior to filing of the Final Map. 3. Access to Parcel B shall be provided via a private driveway easement from Pino Solo along the southerly property line of Parcel A, or along an extension of the existing driveway easement from Pino Solo on the adjacent parcel (Lot 2) . Said easement shall be indicated on the Final Map. 4 . Provisions shall be made for improvement of the private driveway easement. The following shall appear as a Note on the Final Map: 0 Page Four Staff Report: Parcel Map AT 80-57 "The private driveway easement shall be improved with an acceptable all-weather surface to a minimum width of twelve (12) feet with an unobstructed vertical clearance of fourteen (14) feet. Said improvement to be satisfied in conjunction with the issuance of a building permit for Parcel B. " 5 . That a Note appear on the Final Map which states : "Any modification of the ground during development of the site within 50 feet of the drainage swale shall be subject to the approval of the Planning and Public Works Departments. " 6 Effort shall be made to minimize grading that would be disruptive to the natural topography and removal of ex- isting, mature trees. The following shall appear as a Note on the Final Map: "No trees shall be removed without compliance with appli- cable City Ordinances . No grading shall commence without an appropriate permit and compliance with applicable City ordinances. " 7. A Final Parcel Map in compliance with all conditions set forth herein shall be submitted for review and approval in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City Lot Division Ordinance prior to recordation. a. Monuments shall be set at all new property corners created and a registered civil engineer or licensed land surveyor shall submit a letter certifying that the monuments have been set prior to recordation of the Final Parcel Map. b. A Final title policy (CTLA or ATLA) shall be submitted for review in conjunction with the processing of the Final Parcel Map. 8. Approval of this Tentative Parcel Map shall expire one year from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted pursuant to a written request prior to the expi- ration date. Page Five • • Staff Report: Parcel Map AT 80-57 ACTION The Planning Commission should by motion direct Staff as deeded appropriate. TO APPROVE: Motion to adopt findings and set conditions. TO DEITY: Motion setting findings for denial. REPORT PREPARED BY: MARY BEATIE Ass ate Planner REPORT APPROVED BY: low4x LAWRENt4 STEVENS PlanniW Director /Ps r s •��' ' • i •. .ter _ y `.", ,�i \ �Cy,'j- • i ♦• `A- l ,�•.I .\} i LA r. _ � y \..� � ��,-�� • � - 880. �• o �\ o • ••� ;- Sewag Dispo Portc M a2` � -t ♦ • EAG op 71y02 • ,• . �. s Cl E i. !B0 si 0,9 \ F' ♦ 012_\_ • • ,�..c- • !• • / , I•p�Q o ' \�./ / ,r2 �. • P, S Q, � a \� Sant a CAZ9 p �, `� Jr� G j � � •. ....• -• • . • meati On ,fy • /•' �\ `�' • •gip � 3 34 ! I 4 `� • �' Ao 5 kc IL • yr w Fry MAP i' o �, -10 � L / Pk-4gp�� C. •- _ ., �._-. :� 'PR's r= _A -._B Q- P-401 Ajr r {Tait 12 4f 4 moo, _ 21 _ I Ax . � - :,=,•may` x-4r.t;- J .y. - ,s , 19 - 25 - - 1 F. 18 13 14 DctppL AA�/E- 15 p R 16 Pap CO-73-oq 17Y. •\ Pae 2. C—H - I - 14 ¢)• - !off° 5. i. :_• •�� _;�2y� // - •-ate /� P \ 4} /17. � ----Ajw--".w—o 70s--=o/VrC 01. I BO 151 i I 11 1 ate. ' M_E M_O_R A_N_D_U_M_: TO: CITY MANAGER January 7, 1981 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: PARCEL MAP AT 800829 : 1 LOCATION: 10325 Atascadero Road (Lot 15, & Ptn. Lot 16 , Blk 34) APPLICANT: Fred Hartman (Morgan) REQUEST: To allow division of 8 . 5 acres into three parcels of 2 . 56 , 2.51 and 2 . 80 acres each. On January 5, 1981, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing unanimously adopting Findings 1-2, approving a Negative Declaration and approving Parcel Map AT 800829 :1 subject to Conditions 1-9 as listed in the attached Staff Report with Con- ditions 4 and 5 to be revised as follows: "4. The access easement to Parcel 2 as shown on the tentative map shall be shown on the Final Map. Parcels land 3 shall retain the right to use the easements but shall not be re- quired to do so. 5. The improvement of driveways to Parcels 1, 2, and 3 shall be done in the following manner and a Note so stating shall appear on the Final Map: 'The driveways to Parcel 1 and Parcel 3 and the driveway easement to Parcel 2 shall be improved with an acceptable all-weather surface to a minimum width of twelve (12) feet with an unobstructed vertical clearance of fourteen (14) feet at the time of development of each parcel. '" The matter had been continued from the prior meeting to allow additional consideration of access requirements. The two basic alternatives of separate driveway access for each parcel (pre- ferred by applicant) and common driveway access for each parcel (recommended by Staff) are discussed in the attached memo to the Planning Commission. The Commission opted for the former with minor modifications as noted in Conditions 4 and 5above primarily on the basis that it offered the future builders the most flexi- bility in selecting a building site while retaining their option to use the common easement. • • MEMO: Parcel Map AT 800829 : 1 Page Two City Manager Mr. Morgan, applicant' s engineer, appeared on behalf of the applicant and stated a preference for the separate driveway access alternative. He indicated concurrence with other conditions listed in the recommendation. No one else appeared on the matter. G LAWRENCE ST ENS MU RAY ARDEN Planning Di ector City M nager /Ps M_E M_O_R_A_N_D_U M_: TO: Planning Commission January 5, 1981 FROM: Planning Director SUBJECT: Parcel Map AT 800829 : 1 On December 15 , 1980, the Planning Commission considered the sub- ject matter and continued the public hearing to allow additional time to review the access and driveway improvements for the proposed parcels . Staff has subsequently met with the applicant at which time he indicated that his preferences were as follows: - Parcels 1 and 3 not limited to driveway access from the easement only - improvement of the easement (if required) be tied to development of Parcel 2 During the meeting, there was some discussion of the available options for access and driveway improvement. Since the possibility of acquiring an easement from the rear of Parcel 2 extending easterly to a paved street (San Rafael Court) has been eliminated, the access alternatives are now two: 1. Separate driveway access for each parcel. This is the alter- native preferred by the applicant. The 30 ' easement could be established in a manner to allow but not require usage by Parcel 3 . Access to Parcel 1 via the 30 ' easement at time of development is optional but could not be excluded unless specified in the easement description since the easement traverses the parcel. Improvement of the easement driveway seems properly tied to development of Parcel 2' although por- tions of it could be improved if Parcels 1 and/or 3 developed earlier and if either exercised the option to use the ease- ment. If the easement was changed to a flag lot configuration, then Parcel 1 and 3 access would be precluded unless specifi- cally allowed. All weather improvement could be required for all driveways. In his preference for this alternative, the applicant has indicated that the staff-recommended limitation would restrict the eventual developer in selecting a building site on each lot, could result in longer driveways, would allow increased privacy on each lot, and would not adversely affect traffic on Atascadero. If the Commission determines that this alternative is appropriate, then Conditions #4 and #5 should be modified as follows: "4 . The access easement to Parcel 2 as shown on tentative . map shall be shown on the Final Map. Page Two Memorandum: re : AT 800829 :1 . 5. The improvement of driveways to Parcels 1, 2, and 3 shall be done in the following manner and a Note so stating shall appear on the Final Map: 'The driveways to Parcel 1 and Parcel 3 and the driveway easement to Parcel 2 shall be improved with an acceptable all-weather surface to a mini- mum width of twelve (12) feet with an unobstructed vertical clearance of fourteen (14) feet at the time of development of each parcel. ' " 2. Common driveway access for each parcel This is the alter- native recommended by staff and is specified in Conditions #4 and #5. _It provides for one driveway to serve the three parcels being created and for improvement of the driveway in conjunction with the first parcel developed. In recom- mending this alternative, Staff contends that traffic flows can be enhanced by minimizing the number of conflicting points (i.e. driveways) on undivided arterials. Even though traffic generated by this project and on Atascadero Road at this time is not high in volume, it nevertheless is good traffic planning practive to follow general principles in light of higher future traffic volumes attributable to in- creased traffic in the general area. Costs associated with driveway improvements for this alternative may or may not be higher than the first alternative; the primary determining factor being the distance of the eventual building site from the road. If the Commission determines that this alternative is appropriate, then Conditions #4 and #5 listed in the report should be approved. In the meeting with staff, the applicant also objected to placing Notes on the Final Map as required by Conditions #1, 3, 4, 5, and 6 because of costs associated with drafting time . Staff contends that the Notes provide important information to future buyers of lots being created and should be retained. LAl,PENCE S4TVENS Planning D vector • /Ps CITY OF ATASCADERO . Planning Department January 5 1981 1979 STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: Tentative Parcel Map AT800829: 1 LOCATION: 10325 Atascadero Road (Lot 15 and ptn. 16, Block 34) APPLICANT: Fred M. Hartman REQUEST: To allow division of 8. 5 acres into three parcels of 2. 56 , 2 .51, and 2. 80 acres each. BACKGROUND 1. Existing Zoning: R-A (Suburban District) . 2 . General Plans Suburban Single Family Residential. 3. Environmental Determination: An environmental description form • has been completed. The Planning Director has prepared a Draft Negative Declaration for the project indicating no significant environmental effects are likely to occur if the project is implemented as proposed. 4. Site Conditions : The site is generally level to gently sloping and ranges in elevation from 1037 feet at a knoll near the south- west -corner of the property down to an elevation of 1009 feet at the northeasterly project corner. Two minor drainage swales, each trending northeasterly-southwesterly, traverse the proposed Parcels 1 and 3. Vegetation on the site consists of a variety of scattered trees and natural grasses. Two concrete slabs, one measuring roughly 20 ' X 20 ' and the other measuring roughly 225 ' X 20 ' , are present on the site generally lying within the proposed Parcel 3. A fire hydrant is located on Atascadero Avenue near the northwest corner of Lot 15. 5. Project Description: The applicant proposes to divide the sub- ject property into three parcels: Parcel 1 to be 2. 56 acres; Parcel 2 to be 2. 51 acres , and Parcel 3 to be 2 . 80 acres. A 30 foot access easement from Atascadero Avenue running within and along the southerly property line of Parcel l is proposed for access back to Parcel 2 at the rear of the property. Access to Parcels 1 and 3 could be from this access easement or from Atascadero Avenue depending on the eventual location of building • sites. Page Two Staff Report: Parcel Map AT800829 :1 STAFF COMMENTS On Tuesday, November 18, 1980 the Subdivision Review Board met to review this application with Mr. Hartman, the applicant, and Orville Morgan, his engineer. Also in attendance at the meeting were: Larry Stevens, Planning Director; Mary Beatie, Associate Planner; Larry McPherson, Public Works Director; Don Sylvia, Fire Department; and Leslie Cannon, Planning Commissioner. The following are the items of concern discussed with the applicant at that meeting; 1) Provide copy of original deed or other similar documentation which verifies when that portion of Lot 16 included in this application was created. This information should be submitted for Planning Department review and approval before it can be scheduled for Planning Commission hearing. 2) Require individual percolation tests and soils borings for each lot at the time of building permit. 3) Require monuments set at new property corners. 4) Tree removal and grading necessary for site development sub- ject ub ject to Planning Department approval at the time of building permit. 5) Final map to show proposed access easements to be a minimum, of 12 feet in width with 14 feet of unobstructed vertical clearance. Driveway to be improved with an all-weather surface of materials acceptable to the Public Works Department. 6) Parcels to be labeled alphabetically. 7) Show net and gross acreage of each parcel on the final map. 8) Provide 82" X 11" reduction of tentative parcel map prior to Planning Commission meeting. Provide list of owners within 300 foot radius of perimeter of subject property. Provide also, copies of assessor' s parcel maps indicating properties within radius. 9) Project as proposed consistent with General Plan and zoning; recommend Negative Declaration. 10) Easements of record indicated in title policy are to be shown on final map. • • Page Three Staff Report: Parcel Map AT800829 : 1 11) Proposed alternate off-site location of an easement to Parcel 2 should be verified by easement documentation. Otherwise, required improvement of easement as shown on Tentative Map will be tied to the development of Parcel 2 unless development of other Parcels warrants earlier improvement. 12) Drainage swales to be shown on Final Map. Subsequent to this meeting, the applicant and his engineer submitted information as required in items #1 and #8 above to the satisfaction of the Planning Department. FINDINGS 1. The application as presented will not have a significant effect upon the environment and the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report is not necessary. 2. The application as submitted conforms to the applicable zoning regulations and is consistent with the 1980 Atascadero General Plan. RECOMMENDATION Based on the above findings, the Planning Department recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration and approval of the Tentative Parcel Map AT800829 :1 subject to the following conditions: 1. Private sewage disposal systems will be an acceptable method of sewage disposal, if reports, tests , and design are accept- able. All tests , reports, and designs shall conform to methods and guidelines prescribed by the Manual of Septic Tank Practice and other applicable City ordinances. The following shall ap- pear as a Note on the Final Map: "Appropriate soils reports including a percolation test, a test to determine the presence of ground water, and a log of a soil boring to a minimum depth of ten (10) feet shall be submitted to the Atascadero Planning Department prior to the issuance of a building permit on each lot. Where soils reports indicate that conventional soil absorption systems are not acceptable, City approval of plans for an alternative private sewage disposal system, designed by a registered civil engineer, shall be required. Depending upon the system, more restrictive requirements may be imposed. " 2. Water shall be obtained from the Atascadero Mutual Water Com- pany and water operable facilities shall exist at the property frontage prior to filing of the Final Map. Page Four . Staff Report: Parcel Map AT 800829 : 1 3 . Effort shall be made to minimize grading that would be dis- ruptive to the natural topography and removal of existing, mature trees. The following shall appear as a note on the Final Map: "No trees shall be removed without compliance with applicable City ordinances. No grading shall commence without an appro- priate permit and compliance with applicable City Ordinances . " 4. The access easement as shown on the Tentative Map shall be shown on the Final Map and the following Note shall also appear on the Final Map: "Access to Parcels 1, 2, and 3 shall be provided by the private driveway easement as shown. Improvement of said driveway shall be a requirement made in conjunction with the first building permit applied for. " 5 . At such time as improvement of the access easement as shown on the Final Map is warranted, it shall be done in the following manner and' a Note so stating shall appear on the Final Map: "The private driveway easement shall be improved with an • acceptable all-weather surface to a minimum width of twelve (12) feet with an unobstructed vertical clearance of fourteen (14) feet. " 6 . Drainage swales shall be indicated on the Final Map and a Note shall appear on the Final Map which states : "Any modification of the ground during development of the site within 50 feet of the drainage swales shall be subject to approval by the Planning and Public Works Department. " 7. Any easements of record indicated in Title policy shall be shown on the Final Map. 8. A Final Parcel Map in compliance with all conditions set forth herein shall be submitted for review and approval in accordance with the Subdivision_ Map Act and the City Lot Division Ordi- nance prior to recordation. a. Monuments shall be set at all new property corners created and a registered civil engineer or licensed land surveyor shall submit a letter certifying that the monuments have been set prior to recordation of the Final Parcel Map. b. A Final title policy (CTLA or ATLA) shall be submitted • for review in conjunction with the processing of the Final Parcel Map. Page Five Staff Report: Parcel Map AT 800829 :1 9 . Approval of this Tentative Parcel Map shall expire one year from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted pursuant to a written request prior to the expi- ration date. ACTION The Planning Commission should by motion direct Staff as deemed appropriate. TO APPROVE: Motion to adopt findings and set conditions . TO DENY: Motion setting findings for denial. REPORT PREPARED BY: d-)q MARY E BEATIE Associ e Planner • REPORT APPROVED BY: LAWRENCE TEVENS Planning irector /Ps k3p5 4 77 gt1J NVS SAN `� o nz GV ��a1 50}, 9±sy Q y ON Bpa \ RJy „° 75- 1 N � O - -prr `` :po N\• 1 � iii® 110 y. o p pJG.;I�\ 'O� 1 Z�'� / J,�•F$� N �9/•"�)i .Qp ctp7-t5tr d �0r \yO 1 .611 OQ '^ �°a a •:.0 \ �3• R.�o E' � .' 60 cd 6 �Z�� Q N 5 4° •^4 Y N$6•40'V 0.�` \\ \�• '90p a� O >t•90 7"Y Of ^1 336.35 �'•cd 1�� \ .S. a.0?pG• m s G 'oe A ^q ,at2�210\ 3 r O �\ ;pb9 2 0 i 6 k1vN �\ � G2 "� Y \ Bz'•4= �b pc �Q \\o \ � 4 01 Jz y6 �O ¢p5 moo•` ��9 \\ 'c u. ,�yo2 jam• � �\ O t — 5 10 16V oot I'll- p ti o o � hoc J 'y�\ ��• dot�\�� 5� ��°, p&c o •?yy�ti� i �5 0\ o i� M5s �p.�E/ o Pc�4S 106 h� vP. \10 C+\. r '� 40 O \ 3 \ ILI IF o o R n M pZ SyS V 103.4 \ a o, ti cc.. m p f P� a 5 in m AR.Ea M�4P pS AT &00$2q PAZ A MD •V6 tC182� CO /4-52 PPS•�_ � �.3 "`ooS3i P-3 38 => •' PARA P4�. � _Ppdz� � _ ;- �- : ' . 5 - 12 - rArZ L t - \ CCS-71-K4 L ` _ p .13 I PaR:3 2 2 Qk PANG 4 -20 ; L 4 r \ 3 16 16 P A I Y int - _ co-,5 1_ 1 7 4 - r i14 16 aa�� 53 54_ r -55 p= } FSRC, 5I_ L° . t 27 _ / I 28 _ /ear l -50 TIZOMN& MAP V? '49 A7Pae 2 �� ti 1- .:__ Wa ' Q_LLW HQY� PA 6 aT .00'09& •M.Of A M ! ! V s03�0 e ' U- �a m„• �iam� U Q UaSLL� U i o -_ _ .,M ✓s .. UI,-Z�Y lad Q < a�f _ w'FLLNaUiO 3 LL N v <JJ "tu p°v, _ . xY<aua w u°a Z x�oN3W a �z a III,. s . - • _ N G o Q o - • P 14 CIO a �L G 1°23 i"37 \ r., - cacoL z 0 000 cl g' O Lij El 1° \ J) A/I o \ � � m } " c o. N y p a NI w \ � N o, _ p '60 voa -3 tZ. ,J Sbr V L Y r. 0 0 13- 1 M E M O R A N D U M TO: CITY MANAGER January 7, 1981 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: DETERMINATION OF PERMITTED USES IN THE L (RECREATION) ZONE - Appeal of Planning Commission decision con- cerning dance facility and fast food kitchen. LOCATION: Lago Avenue and Hwy. 41 (Lots 7 and 8 , Block JC) APPLICANT: Peter Del Vaglio On December 1, 1980 the Planning Commission reviewed the applicant's appeal of the Planning Director's decision determining that dance facilities and fast food kitchens were not permitted uses in the L Zone and, with Commissioner Lilley dissenting, directed Staff to initiate procedures for a code amendment to consider a dance faci- lity and fast food kitchen as a Conditional Use in the L Zone. On December 15th a letter appealing the Commission decision was received. In reviewing the matter, the Commission considered the three alter- natives outlined in the attached Staff Report and determined that a • dance facility was not a commercial recreational use within the meaning of Section 22. 62. 015 (2) because it was not similar to other uses listed therein. However, after some discussion, the Commission indicated that a dance facility might be appropriate in the L Zone if properly regulated, possibly with- a Conditional Use Permit. This was favored because it allows discretionary review to determine compatibility at a particular location. This matter was considered by the Commission on November 3rd when it was continued since Mr. Del Vaglio was unable to appear, -on November 17th when it was continued to allow Staffto provide additional information on available alternatives, and on December 1. Mr. and Mrs. Del Vaglio spoke in opposition to the Staff recommenda- tion requesting that the use be determined to be a commercial recrea- tional use. Reasons supporting the applicant's position are indicated in the attached appeal letters . One person spoke in favor of the applicant at the December 1 meeting. In the event that the City Council concurs with the recommendation of the Planning Commission, the following Findings; should be adopted: 1. The proposed dance facility is not a commercial recreational • use similar to those listed in Section 22 . 62. 015 (2) in the L Zone. Page Two Memo: Determination of Permitted Uses in the L Zone (Recreational) January 7, 1981 2. Certain characteristics associated with a dance facility are not compatible with other uses allowed in the L zone. 3. The purpose and intent of a specialized zone such as the L Zone may not be realized if uses such as the dance facility which possesses differences in intensity from other L Zone uses is allowed without adequate review procedures. 4 . Consideration should be given to allowing the proposed dance facility subject to Conditional Use Permit review and procedures. LAWRENCEVENS RZ RAY ARDEN Planning rector Ckity M nager /ps RECEIVED OLC 1 51980 December 13, 1980 • Mr. Laurence Stevens Planning Department Atascadero, CA 93422 Dear Mr. Stevens: The Atascadero Planning Commission, on their December l meeting, decided to direct the Planning Staff to consider a code amendment with a dance facility being allowed as a "Condi- tional Use". I appeal the Planning Commission's decision on the basis of the following: it 1. DISCRIMINATORY DECISION: The existing law reads: Recreational Facilities are permitted uses" and the Atascadero Planning Commission agrees a dance facility is a recreational facility. Therefore, the Planning Commission should abide by the present law which states that a Recreational Facility is a Permitted Use, and NOT by forthcoming or future • laws, which will place Recreational Facility in a Conditional Use category. There has been no precedence set, making dance facility "Conditional Uses". Judges during trials give sentences based on current laws, not future laws. 2. UNDUE HARDSHIP: both financial and time. Upon the purchase of the property, the County Planning Department had given me a preliminary approval for a dancing facility on this site. The Planning Commission of Atascadero has agreed a dance facility if a recreational use. When this lot was purchased it was zonel"L" Recreational, which allows a recreational facility be placed on the site, in concurrence with Atascadero current use code. It is common knowledge that when a piece of property is Purchased with a use allowable in a particular zoning, the price you pay is reflected by that zoning use, because of future poten- tial. Should the zoning code be changed to a Conditional Use, in mi&7stream, the value of the property would be affected adversely. Unwarrented procrastination on this decision is placing un- due hardship on me for the development of this project. Sincerely, CITY OF ATASCADERO Q r ° Planning Department December 1, 1980 G C an 1918`, {i E - ! r' 1979 STAFF REPORT i SUBJECT: DETERMINATION OF PERMITTED USES IN THE L (RECREATION) ZONE - Appeal of Planning Director' s Decision con- cerning dance hall facility and fast food kitchen LOCATION: Lots 7 and 8, Block JC, Lago Avenue at Hwy 41 APPLICANT: Peter Del Vaglio BACKGROUND 1. Existing Zoning: L (recreation district) . 2. General Plan: Private Recreational. "Permitted uses shall include light agriculture, single family residences , public parks and playgrounds . Uses which may be permitted, subject to an approved development plan, include all public and commercial recreational uses; resort facilities; • equestrian establishments; retail indoor and outdoor sales; rental and service establishments; areas for campgrounds, trailer courts, campsites and vacation trailers; motels; hotels; lodges; boarding houses; and guest ranches. " (page 50) 3. Request: A preapplication with site plan and elevations was submitted for a preliminary review by staff. The site plan proposed the following uses : a. Dancing hall/discotheque b. Arcade/playroom C. Public laundry d._ Fast-food kitchen (in conjunction with dance facility) e. A retail store f. General offices g. Playground Upon review of site plan and the applicable zoning section, the Planning Director made a determination that the dance hall and kitchen were not permitted uses in the L zone and found that neither use was similar to uses listed in the zoning or- dinance. The applicant has appealed the Planning Director' s determination. • Page Two Staff Report - Determination of Permitted Uses in the L Zone STAFF COMMENTS Section 22 . 62 . 015 (2) states under Departmental Review Uses : "All public and commercial recreational uses including but not limited to baseball parks, golf courses, pub- lic parks, and playgrounds, indoor and outdoor theaters; " It is the applicant ' s contention that a dance hall/discotheque constitutes a "commercial recreational -use. While it may be a "commercial recreational use" in the very broadest sense of the term, it is certainly not similar in nature to the uses listed as examples of commercial recreation uses. Similar uses not listed but considered as permitted would include a racquetball court, health club, dance academy, etc. The applicant also contends that, while the fast food kitchen is accessory to the dance hall, it falls under the heading of "Re- tail Indoor Sales" as in Section 22 .62 .020 Conditional Uses. Food sales establishments, whether they be fast food or restau- rant service, are commonly listed independent of other commercial • uses. Food sales establishments require special consideration in determining if they meet the intent of certain commercial zones and are not generally considered to be retail in natures, es- pecially in the instance of prepared foods. In reviewing these uses, it should be pointed out that many uses have common characteristics; but, the existence of some common characteristics ' does not make uses similar and compatible nor does it make them permitted uses in a particular zoning category. Careful consideration should be given to the intent and purpose of a specialized zone such as the "L" Zone and to the differences in intensity of uses (i.e. floor areas , parking, hours of operation, occupant loads, etc. ) . In addition, it is important to realize that this determination should not be evaluated with respect to the sub- ject site since that is a consideration of a future zoning appli- cation. Rather, evaluation must be based on the purpose and intent of the "L" Zone as set forth in the zoning ordinance. The Commis- sion should also be aware that Staff considers each of the other uses listed in the Background section to be permitted by the L Zone. In considering this request, the following alternatives are available: Alternative #1 - Determine that "commercial recreational" uses does not include within its meaning dance hall/discotheque or dance • facility. The effect of this determination would be to deny the appeal. Page Three Staff Report - Determination of Permitted Uses in the L Zone Alternative #2 - Determine that a- dance hall/discotheque or dance facility falls within the meaning of "commercial recreational" uses due to its similarity with uses and examples thereof listed in the zoning ordinance. The effect of this determination would be to allow the use subject to a review for compliance with appli- cable zoning regulations (i.e. parking, setbacks, etc. ) under the Departmental Review procedure. This procedure would not necessarily result in Planning Commission review of a zoning application although the Planning Director ,may at his discretion bring the application to the Commission following the use permit process. The purpose of Departmental Review is to prevent the establishment of uses not properly related to their sites, surroundings, or traffic circula- tion and allow alternate standards to be established. In essence, this allows discretion to be exercised with regards to development standards but not directly with regards to uses. Alternative #3 - Determine that a dance hall/discotheque or dance facility is appropriate for the L Zone but should be subject to a Conditional Use Permit. The effect of this determination would be to initiate a text amendment to the zoning ordinance. This would require a minimum of four months to complete the text change plus another two months or so for the applicant to pursue a use permit application. A Conditional Use Permit must be reviewed by the Planning Commission at a public hearing. There is discretionary . authority over uses meaning that uses can be denied if deemed in- compatible with surrounding uses and properties. The Commission could also consider revamping the Departmental Review procedure (i .e. providing notice to the Commission and reducing the Planning Director' s discretion) , rezoning the property using planned development or similar techniques, or rewriting the L Zone. Each of these has major implications beyond the scope of this appeal. It can, however, be expected that many of these issues will be addressed in conjunction with general plan implementation projects (i.e. re- writing portions of the zoning ordinance, city-wide rezoning) . ACTION The Planning Commission should by motion direct Staff as deemed appropriate. TO APPROVE Adopt Findings determining uses similar to other "L Zone uses TO DENY: Receive and file REPORT PREPARED BY: RY BEAT E, Associate Planner • REPORT APPROVED BY: LAWRENCE ffEVENS, Planning Director /Ps d 1 V /o 17 Al5 9 7 06 3S �� 17 j6 15 r s 6 ' � �''• 32 dR �� 6 8 :• 33 g 33 20 �3 18 532�7 730 8 2/ s 34 ' �, 0 t'49 �/ y6 4 �P77/dQsr3 ' c°3 22 /0 1 6 ?4 ? 4 75.. ?a 5 ?S i 4w- K750' 39 70 8 w - lo 30 4 a 3s 3� ! F 147 10' 6.c 30 �-- / g 2s 3g 36 l�S. ;t t, 49 4a 50 2s 3 10 47 51 0� z4 4` \b E' ~ 46 P Z 143 TO a 44 5 3 \ l 49 4 5 ,6 /9 4B 45 \ro S° sp 1: a 6 rs, x► S3 9 6� 90 R'� IUZ SB V s4 ss c2 89 R—A 6 - �s 86 17P70 �' 6 �Q — 61 `1 5 r �~ e� 15-A . o VICINITY- MAP -- ZON►NCS MA. • - .. ., _Z _' � eta (z. +. i�"k a.' ..r. _ -j _.- + � , `� 2 ,ice _ '/ -. . " ' a• :� - ' . ' ATASDADER10_ CREEK RESERVATION N0.8 --- - . : -- .�iS/ _: 1'�+�• �� .;1.- " '` 7G j�-fi � ` -. "> 'ID S IGR to }x#.96 ✓TLS __ � .. � W- � �' - � <' •`—� �^. - •� - ,jam .45 � sl t - ro t}1 tat O s sl -• � 0. - \• - , __ --- _ � - 2" 7 � - � _Sat � S"o, 1 ., •. N — SIg6 sn 4.6Q m� Q y 145.26 z 7P20 �� 74- O -4C• O Sn iv V N Oo ai� --- t4 CA in (n C/) m - _ )5 3.48 O—Zi (A z! t° _ Z a H to co Ln AWAPQ,A1CB s•S3P02.4V 460.84%t= 75A I 16.40 ` x - -.. 94.45. - �� - m' _ - ^.. _ a. _ trt t p y" � st w Z �_ y cn a- Spite d�� r f4ar - mm S 30°07' 3ew sp 1 ?..a a loot o .60 w` _- - /4Q�2-.- _ -524 00ri1_ W S4e •_a. S rn 4O W ,33 0 OSA - r � o = _ m ao z 91.10 - ss.2r 300 to � � - '�� - :. 5 _Zt3 -40- -0 o-�$ A55oRs MAP October 8, 1980 • Mr. Larry Stevens Planning Director City of Atascadero, CA Dear Mr. Stevens : In accordance with Chapter 22. 62 Section 020 Conditional Uses of the L (RECREATIONAL ) DISTRICTS of the Zoning Ordinan- ce Code of the City of Atascadero, the following is submitted in justification of compliance with this ordinance. The first step has been taken in accordance with Chapter 22. 62. 020 : All uses permitted under this chapter shall be submitted to the Planning Commission in plan form showing the uses and subdivision of land as it pertains to the over- all development of the entire property. In addition, the plan must delineate existing uses within a radius of five hundred feet of all property lines" . This plan has been submitted to the Planning Department. Use justification: My proposed use for the two (2) lots - (Lot 7 and Lot 8 in Block JC in the City of Atascadero) is a complex comprised of the following: 4 Offices 1 Dance Facility (Commerical Recreational) 1 Arcade (Commercial Recreational) 1 Laundry (Service Establishment) 1 Retail Indoor Establishment. These uses are listed under Chapter 22. 62. 020 L (RECREA- TIONAL) DISTRICTS of the Zoning Ordinance, Section 020. I. "Offices" listed under Chapter 22. 62.020, item (2) lists "Offices" as a permitted use. 2. "Dance Facility" (Commercial Recreational) listed under Chapter 22. 62.020, item (4) call out "All Public andCommercial Recreational Uses" of which a Dance Facility is a Commercial Recreational use. As an accessory of the dance facility, food and drink will be served to the patrons, which falls under Chaster 22.62. 020, item (2) "Retail Indoor Sales" as a permitted use. f i 3. "Laundromat" (Service Establishment). Listed under 22. 62. 020, item (2) "ServiceMtablishment" area permitted use. It is my opinion and that of several other, that a laundro- mat located in this complex would provide a great service for the residents located in and around Morro Road and the Atascadero Lake area. This area is primarily single family residential and multi-unit dwellings, which have a great need for a laundromat facility. Also it provides a service to the housewives, while doing laundry they can entertain their children at the Zoo and Parka 4. "Arcade" (Commercial Recreational Facility) section 22. 62.020, item (4) "Commercial Recreational Use" is called out as a permitted use. 5. "Retail, Indoor Sales Outlet" : Section 22. 62.020, item (2) "Retail Indoor and Outdoor Sales" , is called out as permitted use. Based on the above justifications and quotes from the Zon- ing Ordinance, it appears evident that the uses in this proposed project comply with this Zoning Ordinances. I sincerely believe that this complex will be an asset to the community of Atascadero, both from the esthetic and service standpoint in this "L" zone. The complex will be designed to be esthetically pleasing to enhance the Atascadero Lake, Park and Zoo areas. It will also provide services and recreation to residences in and around this areas as well as visitors to the park. Sincerely Peter Del Vaglio 1661 Encino Court San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 2 October 9, 1980 Mr. Larry Stevens Planning Director City of Atascadero Dear Mr. Stevens : On the basis of your interretortion of Zoning Ordinance 22.62 Section 020, paragraph (2y "All Public and Commercial Recreational Uses" are permitted in the "L" zone, I wish to appeal your interpretation of my proposed "Dance Facility" as not being a (Commercial Recreational) use. Please, place my name on the agenda of the Planning Commission so I can state my justification. Thank you for your prompt attention. Sincerely, �4 • Peter Del Vaglio 1661 Encino Court San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Tel #805-543-8075 22 . 612 . 010 - 22 . 02 . 020 (as amended by Ord. 1500 Chanter 22 . 62 5/14/75) 1. (RECREATION) DISTRICTS sections : 22 . 62 . 010 Uses Permitted . 22 . 62 . 015 Departmental Review Uses . 22 . 62 . 020 Conditional Uses . 22 . 62 . 030 Building Site Area. 22 . 62 . 040 Special Requirements . 22 . 62 .050 Conformity Required . 22 . 62 .060 Building Height Limit . 22. 62 . 070 Yards. 22 . 62 . 010 Uses Permitted. lues permitted shall be as follows : (_ ) Light agricultural uses : (2) Single- family residence - (3) Public parks and playgrounds . 22 .62 . 015 Depa-rtmental review Uses . Uses permitted as follows may he approved by departutental review if in accordance of revelopment Plan approved by the Planning Commission: (1) LiOlt. industrial uses related to recreational developments _ (2) 11 public and commercial recreation,.l uses including but not limited to baseball parks golf courses , public parks and play- • grouncas indoor and outdoor theater-s : - (3) Mineral baths and other types of resort facilities - (4) Equestrian "establishments including stables , riding academies , pact: stations , riding sc;iools _and riding amusements ; (S) All light agricultural uses : 4- (6) Accessory uses or buildings , appurtenant to any approved use : (7) L On-site sign of not over 20 square feet ; (8) Residential uses totaling less than 10 units . 22. 62. 020 Conditional Uses . Uses permitted subject to first securing a Conditional Use Permit if provided by an approved Development Plan shall be as folloi,,s : (1) Residential uses of 10 units or more and including motels , hotels , lodges , boarding houses and guest ranches - (2) Retail indoor and outdoor sales , rental and service establishments and_oflices : (3) Churches and schools (public and parochial schools accredited to the State school system ; (4) Institutional uses including but not limited to clubs , ar.ci fraternal organizations ' (S) Hospitals , clinics , rest homes , sanitariums and other buildings used for the treatment of human ailments : (6) Areas for campgrounds , trailer courts , campsites and vacation trailers ; t, (7) Airports , heliports , landing strips for aircraft , and float plan anchorages : (8) On-site signs in excess of 20 square feet ; -- (S) Temporary campgrounds , provided that no permanent buitdinFs are constructed . 22 . 62 . 030 22 . 62 . 070 22. 62 . 0_30 Build_ inc* Site Area . The minimum b uildinp site area reduir- ee shall e as -T6—] Ioi%!s Three acres . suMect to the following exceptions : (1) Six thousand sauare feet when shov;;i or. a development plan approved in accord with the- provis-i_ons of this chapter and/or the � open space reouirements o-F./Titlo 21 ; -- - _. _ ------- (21) --(2) Illicn cor7hined i•.,ith any "B" district or when an exception is *ranted under the provisions of Title 21 . (Ord . 900 S1 (part) , 1967 : prior code S11-451 . 3) 22 . 62 . 040 Snecial Requirements . Ti Pronesed plans "shall be ciraun in legible form to a scale no smaller than one inch equals one hundred feet . The plan shall contain the fo11oI^ing inforatior_: (a) Boundary lines of original parcel or parcels based on survey data (b) All proposed property divisions (c) All existing structures accurately locater and their proposed use ; (d) \times and Widths of abutting streets -- (e) treets -(e) The location and widths of all streets proposed (f) North point and scale - (g) Typical cross section of street improvements : (h) The location and use of all proposed buildings ; (i) rxistinn trees or proves of trees : • (j ) Proposed utility service easements . (k) 11 proposed landscaping an.0 parking areas . (2) /additional elevation plans , architectural renderings and construction specifications should be submitted to the Planning Commission as supplementary evidence with the application for a Conditional Ilse Permit . (Prior code S11-451 . 4) 22 . 62 . 050 Conformity Reouired. No use shall be establisb.ed and no building permit shall be issued for any site for which a develop- ment plan has been approved in accord with the provisions of this chapter unless such use or structure is in conformance with all details specified on the approved development ,plan_ and with all conditions set forth in the action of approval. Any revision to tlte approved development plan shall he made in the same manner and pursuant to the procedure specified in this chapter for development plan approval . (Ord . 900 S1 (part) , 1967 : prior code S11-451 . 7) _22 . 62 . 060 Buildin- f?eisyht Limit . The building height limit shall e as follows :.Thirty- ive Wit , provides? that additional height. may be permitted as a condition of the permit . (Prior code SI1-451 . 8) 22 . 62 . 070 Yards . 1) I.lininum yards shall be required as follows : Front yard : 25 feet : Side yard : 20 feet : Side yard adjoining street or corner lets: 2S feet ; Rear yard . 25 feet ; (2) P•Iinimum yards prescribed in this chapter may be modified when shown on a development plan_ approved in accord with the provisions of this chapter. (Ord . 900 S1 (Part) , 1967 : prior code Sll- 451 . 9) • s 3 _M_E M_O_R A N_D_U M_ TO: City Council FROM: City Manager SUBJECT: Request for welcome sign Mrs. Sherer, representing the Atascadero Junior Women ' s Club, has requested that the City, to whatever extent possible, participate in the construction and, maintenance of two community identification signs. Her request is attached. It was indicated that the total cost of materials for the two signs is $1 ,200. The following Staff observations should be considered in evaluating Mrs. Sherer' s request: ZONING APPROVAL Davis property - Sign regulations for an A-1 Zone allow only one sign of 20 square feet or less,. Because of the size of the requested sign, a request for a Variance would be necessary in order to use the Davis property. This will require a public hearing before the Planning Commission in response to an application on the part of the sponsor. An application consists of a complete application form, sign plans, a list of property owners within 300 feet, and an application fee of $200. Estimated processing time for the Variance procedure is four to eight weeks. Biagini property - Sign regulations for an R-4 Zone allow signs which exceed 20 square feet subject to Depart- mental Review. This can be approved by the Planning Director or may, at his discretion, be referred to the Planning Commission for hearing. Application requirements would be similar to those for a Variance except that the application fee would be $150. Estimated processing time is three to six weeks. BUILDING PERMIT In order to obtain a building permit, the sign must be designed by a registered engineer and the sign plans must be certified by the design engineer. Engineering calculations are required. This is necessary to assure that wind stress, structural integrity and overall safety construction standards are considered so as to comply with the appropriate statutes as well as to assure avoidance of liability problems . Permit and plan checking fees are estimated to be approximately $80 per sign. Memorandum - Request for welcome sign Page Two FINANCIAL PARTICIPATION If the Council wished to participate, such participa- tion should be based upon review and adjustment of the 1980-81 budget. Funds are not currently available for this project. FEE WAIVERS If the Council wished, it could waive administrative fees applicable to the sign placements if the project is considered to be a City project. CITY MAINTENANCE Since the signs are to be placed on private property, the City's ability to maintain these signs is questionable without a lease or agreement with the property owners for use of their property to place the signs, as well as for right of entry for maintenance purposes. The City does not presently own equipment, such as a high ranger, which may be needed for future sign maintenance. It should be noted that, historically, community and organization identifica- tion signs in other cities have been erected and maintained by community service organizations. CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATION If the Council wishes to participate to any extent, it is suggested that the City' s participation be limited to a waiver of the zoning and building permit fees. This amounts to approximately $500. City responsibility for maintenance of the signs is not recommended due to factors cited above. In any event, all zoning requirements including any necessary Variance requests, departmental reviews, and building permit structural requirements must be applied to the proposed sign installations regardless of the City's participation or non- participation. It is questionable whether a sign on the Davis property of less than 20 square feet would be legible from vehicles traveling at freeway speeds. Indeed, the readability of the service club signs on either sign appears questionable. It is recommended that service club participation be pursued for installation and maintenance of these signs. UR WARDEN MLW:ad 1-8-81 January 6, 1981 City of Atascadero P. O. Box 747 Atascadero, Ca. 94323 City Council : I introduce myself, Nancy Sherer, as a representative of Atascadero Junior Women' s Club. The project I propose to you-- A welcome to Atascadero sign. The accompaning drawing was drawn by an Atascadero High School student and chosen by our club as best. Our intention to provide a community en+ty-way sign would hopefully inform passerbys of our City' s name and organizations within. The land on which the sign would be placed has been agreed upon by the private landowners, Gordon Davis and Ed Biagini. The Biagini land is legally described as a Portion of Lot 7 Block 35 and is zoned R4B2D. The Davis land is legally described as a Portion of Lots 3, 4, or 5 Block 48 and is zoned Al . Both locations offer good freeway visability. Our proposal for sign materials would consist of redwood planking (2x12' s) for an area of 121x8' , mounted on 26' wooden poles at a height of 14' above ground and a distance of approx- imately 501- 75' from State right-aways. If approved by the city the high school woodshop instructor, Mr. John Vial, has graciously agreed to undertake the construc- tion of this sign as his quarter project beginning January 27, 1931 . Atascadero Junior Women' s Club would like to ask for partial city participation in the cost of materials for the sign and do intend to collect the other necessary funds by asking various organizations in Atascadero for monetary donations. Organiza- tional plaques could be mounted on the poles or bottom of sign if clubs wished to do so. I would also at this time like to ask the City' s waiver of the fees required in obtaining the necessary permits for this project since it is a community project. Maintenance of the sign would I hope be accepted by the City as the sign when completed would become a possession of our City. Installation of the sign will be done by qualified members of the construction industry. Your attention to this matter is greatly appreciated. Nancy Sherer Atascadero Junior Idoments Club i Ye Aid ,, s ; J i I r Oa U _ 253 M E M 0 RAN D U M TO: City Council FROM: City Manager SUBJECT: Appearance of Henry Adams regarding, traffic flow The attached letter from Mr. Adams specifies his com- plaint. We have been aware of this problem for quite some time and have had officers on frequent patrol issuing warnings and, if appropriate, citations. The area has a priority patrol designation, but, if other more pressing duties occur at the time of the congestion, the officers may divert their efforts. The problem occurs because of drivers double parking in the traffic lanes while they wait for space to become available near the Post Office or while a passenger leaves a car and attempts to do business without actually parking the vehicle. For the most part, parking is readily available within a block or two of the Post Office area;, but most folks apparently do not want to walk that additional distance. Hopefully, as the officers patrol the area, people will become aware of the problem and will utilize other parking areas. The Police Chief and I do not concur with stationing an officer in the area other than as presently programmed. There is additional nearby on-street parking which is not fully utilized. The problem is basically one of established habit patterns. At the present time, it seems there. is more a "convenience" problem than a safety one. At this point, we intend to continue the patrol activity, issue warnings and, where appropriate, citations. Increased patrol is neither feasible nor considered appropriate at this time. M RRA L. WARDEN MLW:ad 1-8-81 i • L�y PI RECEIVED AN 6 1981 16 Ile,z ;0, : 1 t _ r r q r s 5"c+a '4+4�q^z.'�',^",.w,�r ��,tca r�.t+*,�-�' 'k i� ""�� o ��+3'•++�1.,,�� ar+� ,?Y�Lc '4i+. �s_. ;`a'� ��'".�%,:r.�,f *x 3„�u�.. -,y°—.w ." •,�� \ �+" ��v, �:. �N y� ��.: ROBERT J.WILKINS,JR. MAYOR WILLIAM H.STOVER MAYOR PRO-TEMPORE GEORGE P. HIGHLAND aseadeiCa • MAR ORI N. MACKEY INCORPORATED JULY 2, 1979 LF MURRAY L.WARDEN ADMINISTRATION BUILDING ` ---- CITY MANAGER/CLERK POST OFFICE BOX 747 ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA 93422 FIRE DEPARTMENT PHONE (805) 466.8000 6005 LEWIS AVENUE ATASCADERO,CA 93422 (805) 466.2141 REPORT FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY For the Council Meeting of January 13, 1981 No. 9 1. RECENT DECISIONS OF INTEREST a. Drug Paraphernalia Ordinance Litigation At the Council meeting of March 24, 1980, the Council authorized the City to participate as amicus in the appeal of the case of Music Plus Four V. City of Westminster, which involved the validity of a city narcotics paraphernalia ordinance. This office processed the request to have the City of Atascadero entered as an amicus in the appeal. The Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Second Division, just rendered its opinion in the case, upholding the validity of the ordinance. In doing so, the Court held that the ordinance was a valid police power ordinance under Article XI, Section 7, of the California Constitution, that it was not preempted by the California Uniform'Control Substances Act (Health and Safety Code, Sections 11000-11651) which became effective January 1, 1981, was not unconstitutionally vague, did not deprive the store owner of freedom of speech and expression within the meaning of the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, and did not deprive the store owner of property without due process, or violate the constitutional guarantees of equal protection. The California Uniform Control Substances Act referred to above provides, in pertinent part, as follows: " (a) Except as authorized by law, no person shall maintain or operate any place of business in which drug paraphernalia is kept, displayed or offered in any manner, sold, furnished, transferred or given away unless such drug paraphernalia are completely and wholly kept, displayed or offered within a REPORT FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY No. 9 - Page 2 separate room or enclosure to which persons under the age of 18 not accompanied by a parent or legal guardian are excluded. Each entrance to such a room or enclosure shall be signposted in reasonably visible and legible words to the effect that drug paraphernalia are kept, displayed or offered in such room or enclosure and that minors, unless accompanied by a parent or legal guardian, are excluded. "(b) Except as authorized by law, no owner, manager, proprietor or other person in charge of any room or enclosure, within anv place of business, in which drug paraphernalia is kept, displayed or offered in any manner, sold, furnished, transferred or given away shall permit or allow any person under the age of 18 years to enter, be in, remain in or visit such room or enclosure unless such minor person is accompanied by one of his or her parents or by his or her legal guardian." Subdivision (d) defines "drug paraphernalia" and lists numerous items included within the definition. b. City Pipe on Private Land Held to be a Public Improvement The C.A. lst has held in an inverse condemnation case that a drain pipe installed at the direction of a city engineer and used as part of the city's water system amounts .to a public use and improvement for which damages must be paid. (Marin v. City of San Rafael, C.A. lst, October 31, 1980) C. Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies The U.S.C.A. 9th has held that a person seeking judicial review of a decision of a governmental agency need not first exhaust all of the available administrative remedies if such exhaustion would be futile. Petitioner had resigned from his position as claims adjuster with the Social Security Administration, which he later tried to rescind. (de Leonardis v. Campbell, U.S.C.A. 9th, October 16, 1980) d. Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies This case and the previous one illustrate why the administration of the law is so challenging. In this case, the U.S.C.A. 9th held that the smooth functioning of the Civil Service system requires that a government employee with a personnel complaint against the agency which employs him must exhaust his administrative remedies before seeking judicial relief. In this case, petitioner was an employee of a Veterans Administration Hospital. He filed a complaint with the Civil Service Commission con- tending he should be classified as a physician assistant rather than a health technician because of his qualifications and work duties. The District Court dismissed petitioner's suit on the ground that he had REPORT FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY No. 9 - Page 3 failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. On appeal, petitioner argued that he had exhausted his administrative remedies by complaining about his classification in the first.place, and since the Civil Service Commission had failed to decide the entire issue, the issue remained open and petitioner had an available administrative appeal. The Court of Appeal concluded the smooth functioning of the Civil Service system would be disrupted if those adversely affected by personnel actions could bypass administrative remedies. (Stevens v. Cleland, U.S.C.A. 9th, October 16, 1980) e. Prospective Application of Salary Credit Constitutional The C.A. 2nd has held that a Los Angeles Community College District job classification which limited occupational experience credit to new em- ployees does not violate equal protection. Affirming, the Court stated that the district could reasonably conclude that to fulfill a future need for journalism instructors with on-the-job training, it could be necessary to grant salary credit for occupational experience. Thus, the classifica- tion limiting occupational salary credit to newly-hired instructors was rationally related to the legitimate purpose of enabling the district to meet changing needs in journalism teaching, and did not violate equal protection. (American Federation of Teachers v. Los Angeles Community College District, C.A. 2nd, November 10, 1980) f. Discipline of Public Employees The Court of Appeal has recently ruled that a state employee who is re- instated to his previous job after having been terminated may be disci- plined for his actions during the period for which hereceivedback pay if these actions discredited his employment. (Hooks v. State Personnel . Board, C.A. 5th, October 30, 1980) g. Support of Strike by Public Employees The Court of Appeal has held that a city official who is also a leader of a public employees union is not guilty of official misconduct when he supports his union in a strike against the city. The facts were these: Petitioner was appointed to the Office of Airports Commissioner. Con- currently with his term of.service as a commissioner, he was also an officer of a union local. Some 17 unions, which included his, went on strike against the city. He recommended that the members of his union participate in the strike, and he also refused to authorize any plumbing repairs by the plumbers union of the government buildings during the time he was a commissioner (he was a member of the plumbers union) . When the strike ended- he was suspended from his job as airports commissioner, and administrative charges were filed against him alleging official misconduct. The city alleged that petitioner had encouraged the strike and aided in • its continuance, contrary to the interests of the people of the city and in violation of the city charter. At a hearing on the charges before the REPORT FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY No. 9 - Page 4 County Board of Supervisors, there was testimony that while petitioner was on the commission no official business that could any way benefit his union was heard. Also, he did not attend any airport commission meetings during the strike. The Board of Supervisors nevertheless found he had committed acts constituting official misconduct and resolved to remove him from office. The Court held that petitioner was not guilty of official misconduct because the charges against him had nothing to do with his official capacity as airports commissioner nor with the performance of his duties as such. The official misconduct would require a direct relationship between the alleged wrongdoing and the office held. The Appellate Court affirmed the holding of no official misconduct. (Mazzola v. City and County of San Francisco, C.A. lst, November 17, 1980) 2. PENDING LITIGATION a. City of Atascadero v. Daly, et al. There have been no further- developments. The City has not yet received Appellant's reply brief, r b. Snow, Atascadero Firefighters Association v. City of Atascadero, et al. A hearing on Petitioners' petition for a°writ of mandamus to require the City to honor the MOU between the Firefighters Association and the former Atascadero Fire Prevention District is set for Monday, February 2, at 9 A.M. in Department II of the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo Coun y. 3. SHORT COURSES ON THE GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING CLINIC The University of California Extension Program is sponsoring two back-to- back, one-day, short courses on "The General Plan, California Law, Current Legal Issues, and Recent Case Law," and a "Zoning Clinic." The Northern California site and date for these courses will be San Francisco on January 15 and 16, 1981. Topics included in the General Plan course are: Principles of constitutional law as they influence planning, land use, zoning, and subdivision law; Cali- fornia's planning law and the general plan requirements of the Government Code; what constitutes a legally adequate_general plan?; what subjects must be addressed?; the Code's requirement for consistency between land use regu- lations and egu-lations_and the general plan; the general plan in relation to CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act) and EIRs (Environmental Impact Reports) ; housing element requirements and the new legislation; general plan issues currently in litigation; recent case law; enforcement of the Code's requirements; and citizen suits, sanctions, etc. • REPORT FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY . No. 9 - Page 5 Topics to be included in the Zoning Clinic are: Principles of constitutional law as they influence planning, land use, and zoning law; California's land use and zoning law, and the relationship of comprehensive planning to zoning; sources of zoning power; purposes and limitations of zoning; types of zoning control; alternatives to zoning; development agreements; administration of zoning ordinances; procedural mechanisms; legal due process; alternatives to the planning commission as the zoning agency; enforcement; and issues in litigation and recent case law. The registration fee is $85 for each course. Inasmuch as these subjects have an immediate bearing on the City of Atascadero and the functions of the City Attorney's Office, I am planning to attend them. Respectful submitted, ALLEN GRIMES City Attorney AG:fr 0 • l M_E M 0_R_A N_D_U M_ TO: City Council FROM: City Manager SUBJECT: Recommendation of Parks and Recreation Advisory Board for hiring a Recreation Director Attached is a copy of a memo from the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and a copy of the minutes of their meeting of December 11, 1980 . The memo proposes a different approach to the hiring of the Recreation Director thanwe have followed in interviewing and hiring Department Heads. Our current personnel ordinance, Ordinance No. 24 , specifies that the City Manager shall hire Department Heads with the review, concurrence, and confirmation of the Council. City Ordinance No. 4 has the same provisions. In order, therefore, to conform to the recommendations of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board, it would be necessary to change those two ordinances. I do not see anything unique in the position of Recreation Director as compared to other Department Head positions which justifies changing our past procedures. Further, the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board is a non-operational board and, as such, not concerned with personnel problems. Its charter is to act as a policy advisory group. As you will recall, the Planning Commission did not participate in the selection process for the Planning Director and, certainly, the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board is in no different category than is the Commission. The very purpose of our personnel selection process is to avoid selection through boards and commissions and to attempt to remove Department Head selection from a partisan-type approach to hiring. The recommendations in the attached memo do not take into account the process which has been established by ordinance and by practice over the last 18 months. The memo seems to place great reliance on the need for the Advisory Board to be involved in the personnel process, a position with which I do not agree in view of our ordinances and in view of practice of the management process. As an Advisory Board in policy matters, it has a large arena within which to operate pro- viding a valuable contribution towards establishing parks and recreation policies leading to a vital recreation program. It need not become involved in administration to achieve its goals. It is my intention to follow the same procedures that we followed with other Department Head positions and, when • the appropriate time comes, I shall request assistance from you. This matter will be on the agenda of January 12th for your decision as to (1) whether you wish to adopt the recom- Memorandum - Recreation Director Hiring Page Two mendation with the necessary changes in ordinances, or (2) whether you wish to keep our present ordinance and system and apply it to the hiring of the Recreation Director. My recommendation is for the latter. ARRA Y WARDEN MLW:ad 1-5-81 MEMO: • DATE: December 17, 1980 TO: Atascadero City Council FROM: Atascadero Parks and Recreation Advisory Board SUBJECT: Interview Process At our meeting of December 11, 1980, we discussed, at length, the methods which might be used in the selection process for the position of Recreation Director for the City of Atascadero. Based on that discussion, we would like to make the following recommendation-- for your approval: 1. That three (3) members of the Atascadero Parks & Recreation Advisory Board and Stuart Ross screen the written applications and resumes down to approximately ten (10) . 2._.' An Oral Board consisting of Parks &Recreation pro- fessionals in the area. and possibly a member of City Council, interview these ten (10) or so persons, and select the top three (3) for the City Council to select from. There are numerous reasons for this recommendation, but primarily we feel that in some manner this board should be involved in the selection process. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Atascadero Parks & Recreation Advisory Board APRAB:dlb cc: Stuart T. Ross .< • MINUTES ' • ATASCADERO PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD Regular Meeting December 11, 1980 • 7:30 p.m. 1. Meeting called to order by chairman, Dave Cannon. 2. Roll Call: Present Cannon, Meyer, Stephenson, Doser, S. Ross, Nelson, Bentley 3. Changes to last meeting minutes: Item 5A State Hospital acreage, Dave Cannon looking into matter not Dave Hamilton: Also, under New Business, the date for setting by-laws should be February 1, 1981, not February 1, 1980. Minutes accepted with changes. 4. Old Business: A. Recreation Supervisor — Stuart explained how the City Council decided to go ahead and hire a Director for the Recreation Department. They will readvertise and raise the pay. Stuart explained he felt they needed a full-time Director, because he couldn't do justice to both jobs. He explained that he would help Atascadero as long as Atascadero wanted his help. He also stated that Paso Robles would not shut the doors to Atascadero residents just because the City now has a Recreation Department, Paso Robles' facilities are still open. Discussion of the screening process for the Director. The Board felt they should be involved. Rolfe Nelson suggested a written proposal be made up suggesting a screening process and stating reasons why, to be sent to the City Council. Motion to send a memo to City Council stating: 1. Three members of the Advisory Board and Stuart screen the applications down to approximately the ten best applicants. 2. A Board of Parks & Recreation Directors with Stuart and possibly a City Council member, interview these applicants and narrow them to the`best approximate best three. v 3. Let the City Council interview 'these approximate three, and choose one from those. The reasons for this hiring process are that people experienced in the Recreation Field will know who is pro- fessionally qualified for the job, and the Advisory Board will be involved. 5. New Business: . A. Presentation by the Jaycees - Ken Meyer`-reported on the Physical Fitness Trail. He stated that the area around the Lake would not be a wise decision because of hazard to pedestrians, and conditions of the area around the Lake. He recommended an alternative site on the park grounds. He showed a map of this area going through the Park and around Alvord Field. This site was considered for several reasons, as brought out in Ken Meyers report such as less traffic, sufficient room, would require minimal environmental changes. Ben Hoff explained about a physical fitness course with different stations throughout the trail. He felt that most of the cost could be taken care of by donations and volunteer work. Discussed that work should be done jointly with Larry McPherson, Public Works, on this project with a more detailed plot. Motion to thank Jaycee's for the work they've done and help they've given on this plana Also that they bring the plan to Larry McPherson and work with him on it, passed. 4. Old Business: C. Report of Amphitheater - Steve Stephenson read his report on the Amphitheater. Told that there has been an application for approval submitted for a Public Benefit Corporation to be registered as "Atascadero Amphitheater Association." One of the members Rick Nelson, explained they aren't a formal organization yet so they cannot accept any money for the project as of yet.-- They've had appraisels on the land and say there will be no problems with getting the money. If and when they can develop this land it will be used as a concert bowl, to be used as a natural amphitheater, as it is a big part of Atasca.dero's history. B. Report of Atascadero Park and Lake Development - Steve Stephenson explained that Dan Ross and himself looked into a section that could be used as a pilot area. The Pilot area covers an approximate 500' area from Marchant Way, Santa Rosa to Lake View Dr. Redeveloping the bridge would be the project. He suggested using the high school construction crew for the labor. Stuart explained about a Land & Water Conservation Act. He knows of a Landscape Architect who goes out and gets the grants and works from that money. He said the money Atascadero receives from Prop. One could be used as seed money for the grant. Stephenson and Ross will have more information next meeting. D. Children's playground equipment - Memo from Larry McPherson, Public Works, covered all points on the Children's play area at the Lake. Signs have been ordered stating a maximum of age for the equipment. 5. New Business: B. Winter Brochure - Stu explained the brochure is almost ready to be printed. The Department will be offering approximately 17 different-types-of classes. He explained that a memo was sent to Murray Warden, City Manager explaining the need for space for classes. He asked what the possibility of using the Lake Pavilion would be. 6. Unscheduled Matters:- It was brought up that Soccer is .looking for someone to take over the program. They were wondering if the Recreation Department is planning too. Stuart explained Paso goes through SCMAF (Southern California Municipal Athletic Federation) which covers the insurance also. The Recreation Department in Paso Robles takes care of the sign-ups, scheduling, and uniforms. He said that it takes a lot of work and it would just depend on how much involvement in the local programs the Board felt they have. It was decided to invite the leaders of soccer, Mr. & Mrs. Weismann, to our mxt meeting to discuss this matter. Jan Baum will call and invite them. It was decided to send a memo to Larry McPherson, to invite him to our next meeting to listen to the proposed plans. • Cannon wanted to know what cost would be involved in lighting Alvord field to use for softball. Stuart explained it just depended on haw much volunteer work and volunteered materials were given. It could cost anywhere from $20,000 to $60,000. Discussed expensiveness of using school facilities. 7. Motion to adjourn at 9:50, passed. Respectfull submitted, Debbie Bentley DZI M E M 0 R A N n U M • TO: Murray Warden FROM: Larry McPherson SUBJECT: Federal Flood Insurance Program Recommendation: It is requested that City Council approve the attached Resolution agreeing to participate in the National Flood Insurance Program. This program allows City residents to acquire flood insurance at subsidized rates. Background: Historically, the national response to flood disasters was generally limited to construction of flood control works (dams, levees , seawalls , etc. ) and providing various forms of disaster relief to flood victims. The public could not buy flood coverage from insurance companies since the companies had no way to establish an acturial rate. Also building techniques to reduce flood damage were often overlooked. • In the wake of mounting flood loss, Congress established the Nat- ional Flood Insurance Program with the passage of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968. The program was originally; administered by the Federal Insurance Administration, which has since changed its name to the Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) . The program included detailed study of watercources throughout the urbanized areas of the nation. In Atascadero, the detailed study included the Salinas River, Graves Creek, Atascadero Creek, Paloma Creek and the North Fork of the Paloma Creek. Flood profiles for the 10, 50, 100 and 500 year floods, limits of the 100 and 500 year flood plains , and floodways were developed for the above mentioned watercourses. Based upon this information, flood insurance zones were assigned to the entire incorporated area of Atascadero. The passage of this resolution ( and subsequent application for the Regular Program ) will allow property owners of Atascadero to purchase flood insurance at the Regular Program rates listed in Rate Table II, rather than under the Emergency Program Rates listed in Rate Table I, the only rates currently available. RENCE McPHERSONUaw 404 LM:vh 12-31-80 RESOLUTION NO. 2-81 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO APPROVING PARTICIPATION IN THE NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM WHEREAS, certain areas of Atascadero are subject to periodic flooding, mudslides (i.e. mudflows) , or flood-related erosion, causing serious damages to properties within these areas; and WHEREAS, relief is available in the form of Federally sub- sidized flood insurance as authorized by the National Flood in- surance Act of 1968 ; and WHEREAS, it is the intent of this Council to require the rec- ognition and evaluation of flood, mudslide (i.e. , mudflow) , or flood-related erosion hazards in all official actions relating to land use in areas having these hazards; and WHEREAS, this body has the legal authority to adopt land use and control measures to reduce future flood losses pursuant to Section 65850 of the California Government Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Council hereby: 1. Assures the Federal Insurance Administration that it will enact as necessary, and maintain in force in those areas having flood, mudslide (i.e. , mudflow) or flood related erosion hazards, adequate land use and control measures with effective enforcement provisions consistent with the criteria set forth in Section 1910 of the National Flood Insurance Program Regulations; and 2. Vests the City Engineer with the responsibility, authority, and means to: a. Assist the Administration, at his request, in his delineation of the limits of the area having special flood, mudslide (i.e. , mudflow) , or flood- related erosion hazards. b. Provide such information as the Administrator may request concerning present uses and occupancy of the flood plain, mudslide (i.e. , mudflow) or flood- related erosion area. C. Cooperate with Federal, State and Local agencies and private firms which undertake to study, survey, map and identify flood plain, mudslide (i.e. , mudflow) , or flood related erosion areas, and cooperate with neighboring communities with respect to management of flood plain, mudslide (i.e. , mudflow) , and/or flood related erosion areas in order to prevent aggravation of existing hazards. Resolution No. 2- i Page Two d. Submit on the anniversary date of the community' s' • initial eligibility an annual report to the Adminis- trator on the progress made during the past year within the community in the development and imple- mentation of flood plain management measures. e. Upon occurrence, notify the Administrator .in writing whenever the boundaries of the community have been modified by annexation or the community has other- wise assumed or no longer has authority to adopt and enforce flood plain management regulations for a particular area. In order that all Flood Hazard Boundary Maps and Flood Insurance Rate Maps accurately represent the community' s boundaries, include within such notification a copy of a map of the community suitable for reproduction, clearly delineating the new corporate limits or new area for which the com- munity has assumed or relinquished flood plain management regulatory authority. 3. Appoints the City Engineer to maintain for public inspec- tion and to furnish upon request, for the determination of applicable flood insurance risk premium rates within all areas having special flood hazards identified on a Flood Hazard Boundary Map or Flood Insurance Rate Map, any certificates of flood-proofing, and information on the elevation (in relation to mean sea level) of the level of the lowest habitable floor, (including basement if habitable) of all new or substantially improved structures, and include whether or not such structures contain a base- ment, and if the structure has been flood-proofed the elevation (in relation to mean sea level) to which the structure was flood proofed. 4 . Agree to take such other official action as may be reason- ably necessary to carry out the objectives of the programs. On motion by Councilman and seconded by Councilman , the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following vote: AYES: NOES : ABSENT: ATTEST: ROBERT J. WILKINS, JR. , Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: • MURRAY L. WARDEN, City Clerk ALLEN GRIMES, City Attorney ;D3 M E M O R A N D U M TO: City Council FROM: City Manager SUBJECT: Settlement of claims against the City Attached is a resolution establishing a procedure for adjusting smaller claims against the City. One of the goals of our JPA in becoming self-insured was to attempt to expedite the claims process and, if possible, to avoid litigation. One way of achieving this is to expedite settlement of smaller claims. The attached resolution is designed to achieve that goal. It provides formal authori- zation to the JPA adjustor to settle claims which do not exceed $1,000 and provides authority to reach a settlement agreement with both the concurrence of the City Manager and City Attorney for claims up to $5,000 . In the event the City Attorney and City Manager cannot agree, then the matter would be referred to the Council to make a determination. The process works well in other cities and can be most effective in keeping relatively small claims from escalating • into long and expensive litigation. You will , of course, be kept fully apprised of any actions under these procedures . The requisite liability release forms and other legal pro- cedures will be obtained in any settlement. Recommend your approval. /M , RA4Y . WARDEN MLW:ad 1-5-81 RESOLUTION NO. 3-81 RESOLUTION OF THE ATASCADERO CITE' COUNCIL AUTHORIZING THE ADJUSTMENT AND SETTLEMENT OF CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY WHEREAS, the City of Atascadero is a member of the Central Coast Cities Joint Powers Agreement (CCCJPA) for insurance pur- poses; and WHEREAS, as a result, the City receives the services of an independent CCCJPA adjustor and investigative service and will defend claims filed against it; and WHEREAS, for the expedient settlement of claims necessary to minimize costs of the City, it is necessary that the Staff and the Adjustor have specified authority on behalf of the City to imme- diately enter into Settlement Agreements without prior authorization of the Council. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: 1. Upon investigation and determination by the CCCJPA adjustor for the City, that the City appears to be par- tially or fully liable by reason of an incident or acci- dent resulting in a claim against the City, the Adjustor shall have the authority to enter into Settlement Agree- ments on claims that do not exceed One Thousand and no/100ths ($1,000.00) Dollars. This authority may be suspended or reduced at any time by the City Manager. 2. When a claim against the City exceeds One Thousand and no/100ths Dollars ($1,000.00) and it is determined that the City appears to be partially or fully liable for the claim, the City Manager shall have the authority to enter into a Settlement Agreement to settle the claim up to the "ITq / �� amount of Five Thousand and no/100ths Dollars ($5,000. 00) . Any such Settlement Agreement shall be signed by both the City Manager and the City Attorney. 3. All proposed settlement of claims in which the Staff cannot reach concurrences to settle as provided in 2 above, or which amount to Five Thousand and no/100ths Dollars ($5,000. 00) or more, shall be referred to the City Council for determination. 4 . The Claims Adjustor employed by the ,CCCJPA shall be auth- orized to reject any claim filed against the City pursuant to and on the appropriate grounds set forth in Title 1, Division 3.6 , Part 3, Chapter 2 of the Government Code of the State of California. Resolution No. Page Two On motion by Councilman and seconded by Councilman , the Atascadero City Council hereby adopts the foregoing proposed resolution in its entirety on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ADOPTED: ROBERT J. WILKINS, JR. , Mayor ATTEST: MURRAY L. WARDEN, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ALLEN GRIMES, City Attorney • • M_E M O_R A_N_D U M_ TO: City Council FROM: City Manager SUBJECT: CETA contrast We may have an opportunity to acquire a CETA position to be used in the Fire Department for surveying and inven- torying fire hydrants to assure that we know the location of the hydrants as well as their overall condition. In order to qualify for the CETA program, we need to have the approval of the Council to authorize our application for this position. The basic condition which must be met is that the CETA employee must be hired under the same conditions as other employees for a comparable position. The maximum reimburse- ment rate from CETA for a full-time, forty-hour work week is • $3 .69 per hour. This figure must include any merit increases through the period of the program. There are other restraints on the CETA employee position such as refraining from poli- tical activities or being involved in labor disputes or sectarian activities. There is no assurance that,we will receive approval for this position, but I recommend-your approval for us to apply. We will not, of course, enter into any agreement that would change our budgeted amount for personnel positions. VURRA L. WARDEN MLW:ad 1-5-81 • a Fiscal Year 1981 Title 1I-0/VI Sustairment Public Service Employment (PSE) " Request for Position (RFP) Issued by: Department of Employment and Training Services , County of San Luis Obispo, California , as the CETA Prime Sponsor Date Issued: June 2 1980 Cue Dater Not applicable Pur ase: To provide transitional subsidized employment opportunities to low income, underemployed, and unemployed persons in the County of San Luis Obispo and to address unmet public service needs. REQUEST FOR POSITION • FISCAL YEAR 1981 CETA TITLES II-0/VI TABLE GF CONTENTS SECTION I - GENERAL INFORMATION{ AND REOUIREMENTS A. Eligible Applicants E. Solicitation C. Type of Contract D. Period of Performance E. F. Limitation G. Evaluation Criteria H. Availability of Funds I . grogram Intent and Scope J. Procedures for Filling Position Allocations SECTION II - GENERnL REGULATIONS AND POLICIES • A. Joyis ifr C Sis cat��on, and Fringe Benefits .or PSE Participants B. Average 'Wage and 'gage Supplementation Limitations C. Participation Duration Limits D. Maintenance of Effort E. Special Limitations J. Cost Provisions G. Assurances and Certification SECTION III Position Request form for Title II-D and VI Sustainment • SECTIO I • GENERAL ? tFORMATION AN G REQUIREIMENT S A. Elioible Applicants • Eligibie applicants are public agencies and private non-profit agencies within San Luis Obispo which provide a public service, i .e. , schools, government, etc. Corporations which are organized to promote the benefits and protect the interests of their constituents (i .e. special interest groups) are not eligible. g. Sol iciCatiof) To be considered, all responses must be submitted to: Oounty of San Luis Obispo Department of Employment and Training Services 303 Higuera San Luis Obispo CA 93401 Any questions should be addressed to Jim Grant at 549-5720 or at the address given above. C. Type of Contract A cost reimbursement sub-gran is proposed on the basis of this RFP. Provision for advance payments may be arranged under this agreement. D. Period of Perfor-mance The period of performance of this contract 1, shall be from October 1 , . 980 through September 30, 1981. Title VI project activities may be scheduled for any appropriate length of time, but must end no later than March 31 , 1381. E. RFP Timetable - not applicable F. Limitation This request for position does not commit the Prime Sponsor to award a contract, to pay any costs incurred in the preparation of a response to this request, or to procure or contract for services or supplies. The Prime Sponsor reserves the right to accept or reject any or all requests received as a result of this position request, to negotiate with all qualified sources, or to cancel in part or its entirety this RFP if it is in the best interests of the Prime Sponsor to do so. G. Evaluation Criteria Prospective PSE employers are advised that the selection of a �,:orksite for position allocation is to be made after preliminary review of sustain- meat requests by ETS sn ff. • -1- SUSTAINPIENT REQUEST • REVIEd CRITERIA Criteria (1) Employee skill development potential of the position. (2) Employee transitional potential of the position. (3) Unmet (public service aspects). (4) Agency management (fiscal and administrative responsibility) . Prcject proposals will be by the Program Planning Committee of the Prime Sponsor CETA Planning and Advisory Council . Each committee member will evaluate the project proposals on the various factors enumerated below, assigning to that factor a numerical rating. The scores then will be averaged and a numerical rating. The scores then will be averaged and a numerical ranking of requests established. The corrrnittee's recommendations will be forwarded to th-e" full CETA Planning and Advisory Council for their consideration and recommendation to the County Board of Supervisors for their fundinq decision. TITLE VI PROJECT PROPOSAU RATING CRITERIA Criteria tlaximum Points = 100 (1) Public service goals & objectives (need for and purpose of project) 0-24 Points (2) Viability of goals S objectives (Is planning realistic to achieve proposed goals?) 0-24 points (3) Employee skill development potential of the position 0-24 points (4) Innovativeness of the project 0-14 points (5) Agency management (fiscal and administrative responsibility) 0-14 points • -2- H. Availability of Funds Although a specific allocation level for fiscal year 1980 PSE activities has not been received, preliminary planning estimates for the County of San LuisObispo (based on the funds requested in the President' s budget) indicate 5919,000 for Title II-D and 5510,000 for Title VI . Under Title Vi , at least 50% of the funds made available are required (by the Depart- ment of Labor) to be utilized in PSE projects. The estimated amounts available for subgrants, in consideration of re- quired amounts for services, participant training , and ETS administrative costs , will be $515,400 and S-158,500 for Title iI-D and Title VI re- spectively. I . Program Intent and Scooe CETA public service employment is subsidized employment with public and private non-profit employers who provide public services. Under the CETA amendments of 1918, Title II-D provides transitional employment, training, and services to unemployed, economically disadvantaged persons who lack the necessary skills and/or employment experience to enable them to success-fully compete in the labor market. Title VI , the countercyclical public service employment program, provides temporary employment to low income persons during periods of .high unemployment. All PSEP ositions must result in an increase in participant employment and training opportunities over those which would otherwise e be made available. Public service jobs include , but are not, limited to work in such fields as environmental quality, child care, health care, education, crime prevention and control ,_prisoner rehabilitation, transporation, recreation, maintenance of parks, streets and other public facilities , solid waste removal , pollution control , housing and neighborhood improve- ment, rural development, conservation, beautification, veterans' outreach, development of energy technologies, and other fields of human betterment and community improvement. PSE positions made available as a result of this Request for Position will consist of both "sustainment and "project" positions. PSE sustainment positions will be available under both Title II-D and Title VI. Project positions will be available only under Title VI . The project design differs from sustainment positions in that a project is a de- finable task or group of related tasks .ihich will be completed within a specified period of time, has a public service objective, will result in a specific product or accomplishment, and would otherwise not be done with existing funds. PSE participants are job-ready persons who are qualified (in terms of education, skills , experience, etc. ) for their positions . They are to be treated the same as regular employees in the same classifications , in terms of supervision, job content, per=or"mance expectations , 'ruses , fringe benefits, etc. -3- County of San Luis Obispo' s policy generally allows enrollment of PSE • participants for a maximum of 12 months (see section on maximum participation time for additional information) . PSE participants are expected to seek unsubsidized employment, within the limits of their, PSE job committments and PSE employing agencies are expected to make every reasonable effort to transition participants into permanent employment. J. Procedure for Pilling Position Allocations Job orders for approved PSE positions are prepared by the Department of Employment and Training Services and submitted to the CETA Service Center. Participant applications are received by the CETA Service Center. CET;-eligible applicants are assessed to determine which program activity, if any, is appropriate for them. A PSE applicant pool is compiled of those participants whose needs are best served by enrollment in the PSE Program. The PSE applicant pool is screened by CETA Service Center staff to identify persons who are currently eligible to participate in the program • and who are qualified for the position. Three to five most-in-need candidates are referred to the employer for consideration. Pre-selection by employers is strictly prohibited to insure that the program serves the most-in-need persons as required by the Act. The Intake Unit coordinates appointments for the interviewing of eligible applicants by the employer and furnishes rating sheets for all referred applicants. The employer is expected to select from the group of re- ferred applicants. It is important that rating sheets be completed and returned. They serve as documentation of selection based on objective, job-related criteria and are helpful in identifying special problems and barriers to employment of the applicant. The employer notifies the CETA Service Center of which applicant was selected for the PSE position. Depending upon the arrangement agreed upon, either intake staff or the employer notifies all candidates of the outcome of their interviews. The CETA Service Center conducts orientation to the PSE program with the selected candidate, completes enrollment paperwork, and assumes on-going responsibility for the coordinating counseling/monitoring function of the employee. � itle 110 and VI PSC Procedure . FY 1931 Timetable �\ • ` Prime j �\ Sponsor Prepares RFP FP Advertised RFP Pkg. June 2 Available / i RFP Received by June ZG \\ ETS Program Ply� Cornni ttee/ (Title VI Project) Recommendation July 7 Public; kearing j i CETA Plannin ,i Council Title VI Project July 18 i rote/Approval j/ i Ye i� i ; / Boardof i Supervisors August 11 Approval i Program Gctooer i Start-Up Note: No ,RF` workshop will be held. ETS staff will to avaliable to provide technical assistance when needed. SECTIOPi I ! _ .. GENERAL REGULATIONS AND POLICIES • A. Job Classifications and Frince Benefits for PSE Participants All classifications with respect to employment status (e.g. full time, permanent, or temporary) in which CETA PSE participants are requested shall include nor;-CETA personnel within the same employment status at the requesting agency. Where only federally subsidized employees work for an employer, classifications may be limited to them. Classifications shall not be established exclusively for CETA partici- pants nor shall participants be placed in existing or new classifications in order to reduce or deny benefits to which they are entitled. Mote: Position classifications cannot be created solely for PSE participants, however, new classifications may be developed as long as the potential exists to utilize the classification for non-CETA employees. Such classifications must be approved through the agency' s normal personnel procedures. Position qualifications, duties , and responsibilities must be conanensurate with salary level . PSE participants shall be paid wages not less than the highest of the minimum wage rate specified by Federal , state, or local law, or the prevailing wage rate for persons similarly employed. PSE participants must also receive the same fringe benefits as non-CETA personnel in the same employment status , except for retirement which is not generally provided for CETA participants. The employer costs for these fringe benefits are paid by CETA up to the prorated share of the wage payment • allowable under CETA (e.g. if employers supplement wages under Title VI , the employer must pay the associated share of fringe benefits) . Unemploy- ment Insurance coverage is provided for PSE participant through separate Federal (DOL) funds and thus is not a cost for the employer or chargeable to PSE. B. Average rJaee and ',dace Suoolementation Limitations The proposed reindexed average wage for San Luis Obispo for fiscal year 1921 is S1, 665_ The average applies to Title II-D and Title VI , includes wages received as a result of scheduled increases (such as merit or cost of living) , and is figured on an annualized (conversion to full-time) basis for part-time positions. The methodology established to insure compliance with the average annual wage guideline is as follows: 1. ) For each PSE participant hired, (a) Multiply the participant' s hourly 'nage rate by the number of hours in the normal weekly full-time schedule for the position. (b) Multiply the product of (a) above by 52 to annualize the rate. • 21 Add together the annualized wages for all participants included in 1) above. -5- 3. j Divide the Mal arr „'Qd it in i akovr by the VIM nunbnr of participants inf.i'.tod inl ;lnve ui ther overtime ,.a • i nor i ca i funds used to iupplun.ar• ME salarie • is Zo ne incluacd in the computation of the annualizod :rage waq^ w, The normal full - time work schedule for a ^.ii: itinn may be no less than 32 ncors. l kwing. the nnihodcic3y r enti G ied .i va , nrr'�utsti n if t. ly hour tic meeting the iis' 9i year . _ delire o 37,667 , . as foil i'. s 1 . Average Annual 'Ka is S7,665 2. Dividi_, Dy 52 r.tiCE.ks per ou , 147.40 J. Divided by Normal QW; Ful f !T `i:. . i' heAwle, ..e .: tri iwn rein .0 esol(i r to nv t ny,the f% is , n ' r. SK 69 ner t fir C�, .: niGn,',�ii 'r!f_`_i r.•if ` :ill - tlr _ S 11.`' l�:ir. f;, .;� urs .•.1��. n:}tn it i , the .ixit„an . hili an the CETA pwjram, which mwAt ir':lude i stirtiwl alacj ar:i any merit , step , ,,.r coso of liv nq increisv , which :wuuld oncur during the 12 month puriud. u DGlit'ir'nron :UQieM!'^.:._' titrl Of 1r(ages from I ;n.' l.C_ A iiJndi i4 only ? i r. ii if' under �rl�t _ _.,L' Title VI i j r a . Uder TitloV ! the mi y imum ai'•i)w i)1 :iupp I (_ en P a t i url in SM per Hur , 'which !bust i'@ paid by the cmplo`✓ing agency, This permits 'Huai annual salary rate of anto58 16 5 o r ' m)/ i';.'i'^. of 54. 17 buir for a 43 Our wl _k. 1;54.75 per hour for 35. hour ar.f'Y Lion Limits Lr: 1973 CGTh ?::•.Uf;CPems limit an individual ' i participation time in PSS n no ..sire than it w4: _'YS ( 1 3 'on ihs ) within a five yeir pe -loci. he Aunty of Sang Lits Obispo liminis i_I',`_ i7S:_ enrollment }y;:' iod .n Tilinur of 12 mnnthq , Ttwporary nxtcosicyi may Le 3rir tyl for a partici- pint i - .nt i i . j _ ,'.J_ ., iel Wy e nyployov cm flir[ basis .r . t Vo e pia er . .r.� t e .:KE: to hire _ne ii : ipaQ into paro,:non (u;lsuhii•dized) Inyom .. hir thn ('tens n 1 '. i,n period i idequa • Kllr. MI i ; availahl '.,. . into! 1r t pa : tivipaLion t r,iif' oil ! he WON_ .ill tni(' j' ..rYt) _h l i;., l nA .,pf..n + i -i . :i:!iC• of i I fi t w rn!:r r l _ jig I J All 7ETA :t t , i t i Q in Milian to liri i .inn :+ r i^ fur1jed by no rf'::.V-:f: _ :o ovzlc&n oon ', .1, .n` that rho position 1 2. CETA programs must not result in :he displacc:mr:n , including • displacement, of currently err!ployer workers includes full-time, ^•dr time, permanent, teriporary, seasonal , or contract employ esj . regular (unsutsiCiZed) emcloye= is laid cff :ror, his, her o,b, all CETA participants working for the employer who are in t1he same or substantially equivalent positions must be 1 i . off 31sT,. No CETA participants may be placed in any position �;h ch is the same as, or substantially equiv lent to, any Class' ' icat`,n for which there is a regular employee in lay-off status angor for which there is 3 laid-off regular employee on an active re-emP loy- rent list. If Che employer does not have re-er"plr)rTrcnt provisions , a laid-off regular employee will be considered for CET0 par eses , to be in lay-off status for a period of one full year. If a regular employee experiences a reduction in regular wcrkinq (non-overtime) hours , all CETA PSE participants working for the employer in the same, or substantially equivalent, positions ;Rust experience an equal reduction in their working hours. '11il;o, CETA participants may not, under such circumstances , oerfor-. any of the work which the regular employee would have performed if he/she had not ex, erienced a reduction in hours. 3. CETA programs may not result in the impairment of existing service contracts or in the substitution of Federal funds for other availalr funds. • 4. CETT; positions may not be substituted for other Federailf-assisted Jobs (such as jobs funded under the WIN program) . S. CETA positions -,11y not infringe upon the promotional opportunities cf regular (unsubsidized) employees. It is important the CETA PSE employers understand that Maintenance of .Effort violations can result in disallowable costs and that PSE employers can be held responsible for such costs. �i%l Limitations Political Activities : No CETA ;grogram or position may involve political activities. Particl- cants employed by state and local ^,overnmen t in the adminis`ration o; ^? program and participants whose principal erioloymen: ,s in 'connection an activity financed ty other 47eder3l grants or loans are covered by the Hatch 1'",ct. Political Patronage: '.;o CETA ,'positions will be furd2C.' if t,^,e C.mployer aJ;scrimin tes H' :.^. r ?' to cl .tlCal affiliation. SPeci f ic,.l iy, no eToIoying agency 7,,; 3el e, re-jest, or take adverse action agaI nst 3 partici-,�ant based on that ;ndivi c;;al s political affiiiaticn or belie- .,. T^e s21ec _icn Or ad ,ancefr,ent • of e'7Pioyees a` a reward for o011tiC1 services or as i fcm, D, ;a trcnage, whether or not the po i i t'c21 s rvi re or :>8 crcna.-e is partisan in nature, is discrimination cased on political belie' or affi , ia`ion, and is prohibited. Lobbying Activites No CETA funds or positions may be used for lobbying activities. Sectarian Activities: No participant in any program under CETA may be employed in the con- struction, operation, or maintenance of such part of any facility as is used or will be used for sectarian instruction or as a place of religious worship. Labor Disputes: No participant may be placed into or remain working in any position which is affected by a labor dispute. If a`labor dispute occurs, participants in affected positions must either be relocated to positions not affected by the dispute, or be suspended through administrative leave or other means. However, participants belonging to labor unions involved in the dispute shall be treated in the same manner as any other person who is a member of the union. - Every effort will be made to relocate participants who wish to remain working, and who are non-union members, into suitable public service positions unaffected by the labor dispute. Nepotism• No worksite or employing agency may hire a person for a CETA position if a member .of his/her immediate family .(wife, husband, son, daughter, mother, father, brother, sister, brother-in-law, sister-in-law, daughter- • in-law, mother-in-law, father-in-law, aunt, uncle, niece, nephew, step- parent, or step-child) , is engaged in an administrative capacity by the same worksite or employing agency. If the worksite or employing agency has a more strict Nepotism policy/ requirement than that described above, that policy/requirement will apply. F. Cost Provisions Administrative funds may be made available on a limited basis for specified functions associated with PSE activities. Primarily, allocable costs are limited to joint costs of central service departments, such as the personnel" department .(e.g. processing applications, insurance forms) and payroll de- partment (e.g. processing checks etc). Per Department of Labor guidelines, agency overhead costs are not allocable by virtue of employment of PSE participants in the agency. Only those costs which can be shown, as a result of the CETA program, to be supple- mental to the costs which would otherwise be incurred in the administration of programs will be allowable costs. Agencies who wish to request administrative funds should contact the ETS Planning Unit for information regarding required documentation, reporting, and audit procedures etc. , relative to such requests. All necessary documentation for administrative fund requests must be provided by the RFP due date of June 20, 1980. Administrative fund requests are subject to negotiation and Prime Sponsor limitations. -9- CETA PUBLIC SERVICE EMPLOYMENT (PSE) POSITION REQUEST FORM • TITLE II-D/VI SUSTAINMENT PART A Name of Agency: City of Atascadero Address: P. 0. Box 747, Atascadero, CA 934.23 Phone 466-8000 Person who will provide supervision Donald Sylvia Title: Fire Chief Contact person(s) Ardith Davis phone 466-8000 Type of Agency or Organization Municipal Government PART B Please complete a separate form for each new position classification being requested. For continuing positions, complete PARTS K and L only. Position Title Fire How many? one (Please complete a separate form for each position on classification requested) q ) Entry-level YES x NO • Non-supervisory YES x NO Other Existing classification New Classification x Are there regular (unsubisdized) employees in the same classification? YES NO x Please attach to this request form a copy of a detailed job description for this position, including definition, minimum qualifications (education, skills, experience, special licenses, etc. ), typical job duties, and salary range. PART C Are there currently vacant authorized .positions in the same or substantially equivalent classificant(s)? YES NO x If yes, when will they be filled Are any of the vacant authorized positions frozen or otherwise controlled? • YES NO NOT APPLICABLE x Have the number of authorized positions in the same or substantially equivalent Classification(s) been reduced during the prior 12 months? YES NO x -10 Have any regular (unsubsidized) employees been laid off from the same or. substantially equivalent classifications within the previous 12 • months? YES NO x Are regular employees currently in lay-off status from, and/or on an active re-employment list for, the same or substantially equivalent classification? YES NO x . Have any regular employees in the same or substantially equivalent class- ification experienced any of the following as the result of a reduction in force and/or a reduction in funds Reduction in classification? YES NO x Reduction in pay? YES NO x Reduction in non-overtime fours? YES NO x PART D Income Income for PSE position must comply with Average Annual Wage guidelines as • specified in the Federal Regulations.. The annual wage for San Luis Obispo County under Title II-D is $7, 0. Title VI wages may be additionally supplemented by the subgrantee agency up to $1,000 annually, or $.48 per hour. Entry level salaries should be low enough to permit a salary increase (where appropriate) which will not exceed the allowable annual wage. Entry salary (include anticipated cost of living increases) $3.65 Per. hr 2nd step $3. 72 Per. h =r /Effective six months . Number of working days per week 5 hours per day eight Paycheck issuance frequency Bi-weekly . Employee benefits applicable to the requested position. (Please check all appropriate, boxes and note a or rate for each): -lI- • Social Security (FICA) Meals • ' x Worker' s Compensation. 8 . 710 approx. frequency? Lodging Retirement approx. frequency? x Health Insurance $40. 40 per month Private Vehicle Ins. Unemployment Insurance x Trainins sessions, conferences x Mileage 20 t per mile workshops , etc. estimated miles per week Life Insurance Registration fees, books and tuition X Safety or other equipment x Paid Vacation 10 days per year X Compensatory time (comp time) x Paid Sick Leave 8 hours per month x Paid Holidays 11 per year X Other uniform, PART F Please provide an explanation/description of the unmet public service need(s) • this position would fulfill . Ata cader is a newlyincorporated City that is e periencing airly .apT -cTT-- r. we must Be able to' oroje'ect— future fire protection needs. In order to do this , we need an accurate and up to date inventory of our fire hydrant resources. This position will allow us to inventory this resource quickly. PART G Please describe what efforts will be made to hire the participant into .un- subsidized employment with your agency. This project should take no longer than 10 to 12 months to complete. It is unknown at this time how many months are required annual y or an going program. ere- fore, no permanent employment is anticipated. PART H Please describe the employee skill development potentialof this position. Ability to meet people and to establish and maintain effective working re- ations ips witn witof ers. Ability -to meet and dealwiEnep�'ubI3c effectively. Ability to recognize fire hazards on property. Ability • to work with minimal direct supervision. -i2- PART I Attach copies of the following to this Position Request: All Applicants: • 1. Job description for each newly requested position classification (sample provided) including: a. Job Title b. Function U :e. , size and scope of the job) c. Duties and responsibilities d. Organizational relationships, (i .e. , relation of position to other positions in the organization) e. Minimum qualifications f. Minimum/maximum wage to be received g. Method used to determine salary range. 2. Personnel policies, including complaint procedure and EEO statement, Affirmative Action plan or policy. PART J The following Supplemental Items are not required attachments to this position request. However, they must be available (.immediately) , if • positions are allocated to your agency. The supplemental information shall consist of at least the following: 1. Articles of Incorporation 2. Organization Bylaws 3. Current list of Board of Directors 4, Letter documenting Federal IRS. tax-exempt status 5. Letter documenting State of California tax-exempt status 6. Salary schedule for all paid permanent non-CETA positions 7. Other documents as may be required and/or necessary. • PART K Currently filled 0 positions continued for FY'81 0tach additional pages) if needed) (1 ) (2) (3) (G' S) (6) OPosition Partici . Name Expected r t ic iDant Title No. Enrollment Date Hourly Wage Hours/wk Term Date i PART L Certification The information contained in this CETA Public Service Employment Position Request is true and correct. The Position Request application has been approved by the Governing Board of this organization. Authorized Signature Date Tit' Agency ' f OVr-D AS • /7 + 1 Date.......'. . ! -1u- M_E_M_O_R A_N_D_U M_ • TO: City Council FROM: City Manager SUBJECT: Traffic control recommendations Attached is a memo with maps attached, from the Director of Public Works concerning the placement of various traffic control ,signs and curb painting in three specified areas. The memo is self-explanatory; the recommendations have been coordinated with the Police Department, Planning Department and the rest of the Staff and are recommendedfor your approval. This procedure is being followed in accordance with the recently adopted Traffic Ordinance. RRA L. WARDEN MLW:ad 1-5-81 i • M E M 0 R A N D U M • TO Murray Warden FROM: Larry McPherson SUBJECT: Traffic Control Recommendations Recommendations : It is requested that City Council approve the following traffic control items : 1. Provide a no stopping zone 20 feet in both directions adjacent to the southerly drive approach to El Camino Real at the Atascadero Federal Credit Union. 2 . Place a stop sign on the Mercedes Avenue leg of it' s intersection with Cemetery Road. 3. Place stop signs on Atascadero Road at the intersection of Atascadero and Curbaril, Making this a 4-way stop intersection. Background: 1. The no stopping zone was requested by Mr. Worford of Atascadero Federal Credit Union, and was based on sight distance problems created by vehicles parked adjacent to N their driveway on El Camino Real. Larger vehicles parked at the curb tend to restrict the view of south- bound traffic on El Camino Real by those exiting the Credit Union. A site investigation indicated that elimination of 20 feet of on-street parking on either side of the drive approach would solve the site restriction problem. 2. The Atascadero Cemetery District has requested stop signs be placed on both Magdelena Avenue and Mercedes Avenue where they intersect Cemetery Road. The request was made on the basis of increased traffic on these streets and to facilitate traffic flow to the Cemetery. Neither of these intersections warrant the stop signs on the basis of traffic and only the intersection of Mercedes and Cemetery could be considered a problem due to restricted sight distance from Mercedes east along Cemetery. The recommendation is made on the basis of sight distance problems. • • 3. Recent accidents and a petition requesting a 4.-way stop intersection have prompted an investigation of the intersection of Atascadero and Curbaril. Those making the request cited excessive speeds on Atascadero Avenue as well as the misconception by drivers on Curbaril that this is already a 4-way stop intersection. Our investigation indicated that the two recent accidents may have been prevented by a 4-way stop, however, this type of traffic control could also tend to increase the frequency of other types of accidents , such as rear end collisions. We also found a higher volume of traffic on Curbaril then on Atascadero and that traffic speeds on Atascadero were generally within the posted rate. No serious sight distance problems exist at the intersection. During our traffic and speed surveys, we did note a number of incomplete stops on the Curbaril legs of the intersection which indicates that perhaps a higher level of traffic enforcement at this intersection may tend to reduce accident producing violations. The traffic and pedestrial volumes using this intersection are well below the minimums normally required of a 4-way stop, even considering the approach speed. The accident • experience is slightly lower than that required for the 4-way stop, however, the severity has been high. On the basis of past accident experience and the fact that traffic volumes are fairly well balanced at the intersection, it is recommended that stop signs be added to the Atascadero Avenue legs , making this a 4-way stop intersection. Increased traffic enforcement is recommended after im- plementation of the intersection modifications to assure compliance with the controls. Since most of the traffic is locally based, several weeks of increased enforcement, with warnings issued, should provide an adequate transition period to assure the 4-way stop is working properly. The intersection will be monitored to determine any changes in accident pattern resulting from the modification. A new speed survey will be taken along with a review of traffic citations to see if problems are developing due to the new traffic control locations. These recommendations were discussed with other members of the Traffic Committee and their agreement is noted. RENCE McPHERSON LM:vh 12-29-80 cc: Police Chief Planning Dir. • I I I I 0 0 EL C,41-11AIO o, 2O, CIA QN • Propose Stop Sign /der"coolo . V z o t-v Q u.? Q � ko � v h d a