Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 03/09/1981 AGENDA - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting March 9 , 1981 7 : 30 p.m. • Atascadero Administration Building Call to Order Pledge of Allegiance Invocation Roll Call Public Comment A. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE,TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Item A, Consent Calendar, are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion in the form listed below. There will be no separate discussion of these items. If discussion is required, that item will be removed from the Consent Calendar and will be considered separately. Vote may be by roll call. 1. Minutes of the regular meeting of February 23 , 1981 (RECOMMEND APPROVAL) 2 . Minutes of the adjourned regular meeting of February 28 , 1981 (RECOMMEND APPROVAL) 3 . Treasurer' s Report, 2-1-81 to 2-28-81 (RECOMMEND APPROVAL) 4 . Tentative Parcel Map AT79-031, 7405 Balboa Road, David M. Renton (Twin Cities Engineering) to allow time extension (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) 5. Lot Line Adjustment LA801203 :1, 2825 Monterey Road, Leo and Mary Tidwell/Floyd Wood (Associated Professions) to adjust property line to resolve encroachments (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS) 6 . Tentative Parcel Map AT810107 :1, 9100 and 9150 El Camino Real, Heru;y Huong and Don Messer (Hilliard) to allow division of a parcel into two parcels (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) 7 . Tentative Parcel Map AT801230 :1, 7305 Balboa Road, Gordon T. Davis Cattle Co. (Twin Cities Engineering) to allow division of approximately 11 acres into two parcels (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) 8 . Tentative Parcel Map AT801210 :1, 2200 San Fernando Road Allen Grimes/Don Messer, to allow division of 11 .1 acres into three parcels (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) 9. Variance V810202:1, behind 6010• Del Rio adjacent to Highway 101, Atascadero Junior Women' s Club, to allow community identification sign in excess of 20 sq. ft. (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) 10. Departmental Review R810202 :1, behind 10640 El Camino Real adjacent to Highway 101, Atascadero Junior Women' s Club, to allow community identification sign in excess of 20 sq. ft. and building height limitations (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS) 11. Resolution No. 5-81 authorizing the purchase of Parcel No. 2 in accordance with the agreement between the City and V. M. Cook, et al , relating to the purchase of Mall property AGENDA - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting March 9, 1981 Page Two B HEARINGS, APPEARANCES AND REPORTS 1. Public hearing on Final Environmental Impact Report, Zone Change 2781206 : 1, 8725 El Camino Real, Joie Scolari (Gerrish) to allow rezoning of 6 . 5 acres from R-1-B-2-D and C-2 to C-1 Ordinance No. 39 amending Section Map 12-0-34 of the Official Zoning Maps by placing certain property in the C-1-D Zone - first reading 2. Public hearing on Departmental Review R810106 : 1, 8725 El Camino Real, Joie Scolari (Gerrish) to construct a commercial center including a market 3 . Public hearing on a Conditional Use Permit U810106 : 1, 8725 E1 Camino Real, Joie Scolari (Gerrish) , to consider a master signing program for the commercial center 4. Tentative Parcel Map AT810106 : 1, 8725 El Camino Real , Joie Scolari (Gerrish) to allow division of a 6. 5 acre site into six parcels 5. Zone Change Z810105,: 1, 8250-8400 Morro Road, Paul Washburn to rezone Lots 17 and 18 from R-1-B-2-D to R-4 and to modify existing "D" designation for R-4-D zoning; Ordinance No. 38 amending Section Map 12-0-33 of the Official Zoning Maps by placing certain property in the R-4-D Zone - first reading 6 City Attorney Report No 11 C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Consideration of applicants for Parks and Recreation Advisory Board 2. Ordinance No. 35 amending Section Map 12-0-33 of the Official Zoning Maps of the City by placing certain property in the R-4-D Zone - second reading 3. Consideration of changing General Plan amendment dates D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Consideration of transfer of $1,700 for the purchase of 25 folding tables for Rotunda Room 2. Award bid for telephone system to General Telecom in the amount of $26,152 3 . Selection of Audit proposal , Fiscal Year 1980-81 4 . Quarterly review and Revised Budget, Fiscal Year 1980-81 5. Amending Service Contract for Dial-A-Ride E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION 1 . City Council 2 City Attorney 3 . City Manager I MINUTES - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting February 23 , 1981 7 : 30 p.m. Atascadero Administration Building The meeting was called to order at 7 : 30 p.m. by Mayor Wilkins with the Pledge of Allegiance. Bill Hawk of the Covenant Church gave the invocation. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Councilmen Highland, Mackey, Nelson, Stover and Mayor Wilkins ABSENT: None PUBLIC COMMENT None A. CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Minutes of the regular meeting of February 10, 1981 (RECOMMEND APPROVAL) 2 . Schedule for General Plan amendments (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) Mayor Wilkins reviewed the items on the Consent Calendar. Mr. Warden explained that the dates suggested for General Plan amendments would provide the public with definite times within which to develop General Plan amendments. The suggested schedule also provides for a floating date which could accommodate those necessary, but unforeseen, amendment needs. MOTION: Councilman Highland moved for acceptance of the Consent Calendar. The motion was seconded by Councilman Stover and unanimously carried by roll call vote. B. HEARINGS, APPEARANCES AND REPORTS 1. Public hearing on Zone Change 2801110 :1, 7805 Navajoa Road, D. R. Barksdale, Ordinance No. 35 —first reading (continued from 2-10-81) Larry Stevens, Planning Director, explained that this hearing had been postponed from the last meeting because of an error in an add- ress in the public notice. The matter has been readvertised and notices sent to affected property owners. The Planning Commission determined a Conditional Negative EIR Declaration on the request to allow rezoning of 0 .63 acres from R-1-B-2-D to R-4 , but established several conditions: • Comments were heard from Sharon Stalter, Laura Ralson and Gary Stalter in opposition to the rezoning. Sharon Stalter presented a • i MINUTES - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting February 23 , 1981 Page Two • petition signed by some, of the property owners in the area objecting to a professional office building being constructed in a residential zone. Some of the residents stated that they had not received notices of the hearing when the matter came before the Planning Commission. Mr. Stevens explained the reasons why zone lines should normally follow streets or other prominent lines of demarcation rather than solely along property lines. He stated that the General Plan allowed the mixed use of professional offices and residential and that the Council had previously determined that, in cases of inconsistency between the existing zoning and the General Plan, the General Plan would be the final determinant; at least until the Zoning Ordinance can be brought into conformance with the General Plan. If the Council did not want this consistency, then the General Plan would have to be amended. MOTION: Councilman Highland moved for the adoption of the Planning Commission recommendation. The motion was seconded by Councilman Stover and carried on the following roll call vote: AYES : Councilmen Highland, Stover and Mayor Wilkins NOES: Councilmen Mackey and Nelson Councilman Mackey noted that she was voting no because the residents did not receive the notice for the Planning Commission hearing. Mr. Stevens explained that the same property owners that received notices for the Council meeting were sent notices for the Planning Commission hearing. Mr. Grimes noted that the notice requirements had apparently been met. MOTION: Councilman Highland moved that Ordinance No. 35 be read by title only. The motion was seconded by Council man Stover and unanimously carried. Mayor Wilkins read Ordinance No. 35 by title only. MOTION: Councilman Highland moved that this constitute the first reading of Ordinance No. 35. The motion was seconded by Councilman Stover and carried on the following roll call vote: AYES : Councilmen Highland, Stover and Mayor Wilkins NOTES: Councilmen Mackey and Nelson 0 0 MINUTES - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting February 23, 1981 Page Three 2 Public hearing on_Tentative Parcel Map AT 80-73 , 3675 Ardilla Road, Vera Hand/Loyd King (Stewart) to create a 7 .6 acre parcel and a 2.5 acre parcel and to legally establish a 1 .24 acre parcel previously created without benefit of a parcel map Mr. Stevens reviewed the request and explained how the illegal lots had been created. Mr. Stewart was appealing Conditions #5 and #12 of the Planning Commission recommendations which require a twelve foot private driveway and increase the size of Parcel 3 to 2 .50 acres. Mr. Stewart voiced his objections to these conditions. MOTION: Councilman Highland moved for approval of the Planning Commission's recommendation. The motion was seconded by Councilman Stover. Mr. Grimes noted that placing a condition on a property owner which would require him to obtain property from an ajacent property owner might be difficult or improper to implement. Councilman Highland amended his motion to include that Council overrule the -appeal and approve the recommendation of the Planning Commission on the basis of its findings and conditions. The amendment was accepted by Councilman Stover and the motion was unanimously carried by roll call vote. 3 . Report regarding funding of school crossing guards' - Mayor Wilkins and Councilman Highland Mayor Wilkins stated that he and Councilman Highland had met with a committee from the School Board and that the Board was firm in its determination that the School District would not assume any responsi- bility for paying any portion of school crossing guard costs. It was noted that the City has realized economies in costs by reducing crossing guard hours and eliminating the guard at the Santa Rosa School and, therefore, the City could pay for the program. MOTION: Councilman Highland moved that the City fund the crossing guards at the present level for the remainder of the school year and that such funding be dependent upon continued implementation of programs already established to promote pupil safety. The motion was seconded by Councilman Nelson and unanimously carried. C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Ordinance No. 36 amending Section Map 12-0-34 of the Official Zoning Maps of the City of Atascadero by placing certain • property in the R-4-D Zone - second reading MOTION: Councilman Mackey moved that Ordinance No. 36 be read by title only. The motion was seconded by Councilman Stover and unanimously carried. MINUTES - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting February 23, 1981 Page Four Mayor Wilkins read'Ordinance No. 36 by title only. MOTION: Councilman Nelson moved that Ordinance No. 36 be adopted. The motion was seconded by Councilman Highland and unani- mously carried by roll call vote. 2. Ordinance No. 37 establishing requirements in accordance with the National Flood Insurance Program - second reading MOTION: Councilman Highland moved that Ordinance No. 37 be read by title only. The motion was seconded by Councilman Nelson and unanimously carried. Mayor Wilkins read Ordinance No. 37 by title only. MOTION: Councilman Nelson moved for the adoption of Ordinance No. 37 . The motion was seconded by Councilman Mackey and unanimously carried by roll call vote. 3 . Beautification Committee consideration Councilman Mackey proposed that the City form a Beautification Committee as an umbrella committee which could coordinate the efforts of other beautification committees within the City. She felt that an umbrella committee could be a steering committee and could form sub-committees for various special interest areas. The committee's charge would be to encourage beautification on both public and private property; also they could become involved in beautification contests, city clean-up campaigns, etc. There was considerable discussion regarding City Council formed committees vs. independently formed committees. Mr. Warden reviewed the process for City Council standing committees which included a selection process, meeting place and time, Staff support and conflict of interest statements. He said that Council should determine what committees are needed, whether the committees should be standing or ad hoc, what the committee composition, duties, obligations and responsibility to the Council should be as well as degree of Staff, facility and financial support and the selection process for member- ship. He noted that committees of the City become agents of the City and, therefore, need a clearly defined role as well as defini- tion of responsibilities. Councilman Mackey and Nelson felt that the process should be simple to allow interested citizens to take part in the governmental prones. MOTION: Councilman Highland moved that Council encourage formation of a citizens committee for the beautification of Atascadero. The motion was seconded by Councilman Mackey and unanimously carried. MINUTES - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting February 23 , 1981 Page Five Councilman Highland stated that the committee should make an attempt to inventory the number of groups within the community that are concerned with beautification of Atascadero, that the committee compile a list of projects that are underway or proposed by the various groups and that a priority list of projects that should be accomplished sometime in the future be established. D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Resolution No. 4-81 supporting the continuation of the Local Coastal Commission and the termination of the State Coastal Commission after June, 1981 . Mr. Warden explained that the City of Grover City had requested that cities in the County support their position to retain local coastal commissions rather than the State Coastal Commission. MOTION: Councilman Highland moved that Resolution No. 4-81 be read by title only. The motion was seconded by Councilman Stover and unanimously carried. Mayor Wilkins read Resolution No. 4-81 by title only. • MOTION: Councilman Nelson moved for the adoption of Resolution No. 4-81 . The motion was seconded by Councilman Highland and unanimously carried by roll call vote. 2 . HUD 701 grant assistance Mr. Warden stated that he did not know what chance the City had to obtain this grant, but that it is worth the effort to try for help if available. MOTION: Councilman Highland moved that Staff be authorized to submit an application for the HUD 701 grant and that the City Manager be authorized to sign the necessary documents. The motion was seconded by Councilman Mackey and unanimously carried. E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION 1 . City Council (a) Councilman Mackey stated that she had received several calls regarding the City Manager 's report on the costs for remodeling the basement to accommodate the Police Department and the savings to be realized if the Police Department could occupy the space where the libraries are located. (b) Mayor Wilkins noted that during the discussions with the School District, they had expressed a willingness to help fund the Police Officer to work in the school . MINUTES - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting February 23 , 1981 Page Six 2 . City Attorney) (a) Mr. Grimes stated that the matter regarding the Atascadero Firefighters Memorandum of Understanding has been set over to Friday, March 13 , 1981, at 8 : 45 p.m. (b) Mr. Grimes advised that the Daly' s have resubmitted their appeal with a request for priority consideration. 3 . City Manager (a) Mr. Warden advised that Dave Cannon has resigned as Parks and Recreation Advisory Board member effective immediately. Council discussed this matter and directed Staff to return with the list of applicants recently interviewed for this position and Council will select from that list rather than readver- tising. (b) Mr. Warden advised that two trees in the City will be removed; one on Pismo Avenue and one in the cattle pen at the zoo. The one on Pismo was hit by lighting and is dying and the one in the cattle pen is dying as a result of damage by the cattle. (c) Mr. Warden advised that he had received requests from • the Fire Department Employees Association and the Police Officers Association for recognition under the Miles-Milias Brown Act. He is currently processing these applications and will bring them to Council at a later date for their consideration. (d) Mr. Warden reminded Council to be making notes of their budget suggestions for 1981-82 and give them to him as soon as possible. (e) Mr. Warden reminded Council that they would be inter- viewing applicants for Recreation Director this Saturday. He will let them know the time later this week. (f) Mr. Warden reported on the City Managers meeting of the League of California Cities The meeting adjourned to Saturday, February 28 , 1981. Recorded by: MURRAY L. WARDEN, City Clerk By: Ardith Davis Deputy City Clerk MINUTES - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL Adjourned Regular Meeting February 28 , 1981 1: 00 p.m. Atascadero Administration Building The meeting was called to order at 1 : 00 p.m. by Mayor Wilkins. ' PRESENT: Councilmen Highland, Mackey, Nelson, Stover and Mayor Wilkins ABSENT: None MOTION: Councilman Highland moved that the meeting adjourn to executive session to interview applicants for Recreation Director. The motion was seconded by Councilman Stover and unanimously carried. The meeting adjourned to executive session at 1: 05 p.m. and returned to regular session at 5 :45 p.m. MOTION: Councilman Highland moved that Charles Joannes be selected as Recreation Director with the City of Atascadero de- pending on background check. The motion was seconded by Councilman Stover and unanimously carried by roll call vote. The meeting adjourned at 5: 48 p.m. • Recorded by: MURRAY L. WARDEN City Clerk 1 aj CITY OF ATASCADERO TREASURER'S REPORT FEBOARY 1, 1981 TO FEBRUARY 28, 1981 BALANCE AS OF JANUARY 31, 1981 $ 6 , 806 . 99 'I RECEIVED (Per attached item) 168 ,634 . 00 TOTAL $ 175 , 440. 99 PAID Warrant Registar: 81-081 $ 18,273 .55 11 If " It If If " It81-082 54,597.54 it ifit It it if81-083 86 , 883. 33 (Including payrolls 2/11 & 2/25/81) TOTAL $ 159 ,754 .42 BALANCE AS OF FEBRUARY 28 , 1981 $ 15,686 . 57 PETTY CASH ON HAND $ 12 . 36 LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND $ 225 , 000. 00 TIME DEPOSIT, SECURITY PACIFIC BANK 19. 00% Interest, Matures 03/16/81 $ 100 , 000. 00 TIME DEPOSIT, SECRUITY PACIFIC BANK 18. 00% Interest, Matures 03/19/81 $ 100, 000. 00 TIME DEPOSIT, MID-STATE BANK 17. 50% Interest, Matures 03/18/81 $ 100 , 000. 00 STIME DEPOSIT, MID-STATE BANK 15. 25% Interest, Matures 04/24/81 $ 100, 000. 00 TIME DEPOSIT, MID-STATE BANK 15 . 25% Interest, Matures 04/24/81 $ 100, 000. 00 TIME DEPOSIT, MID-STATE BA14K 15. 25% Interest, Matures 04/24/81 $ 100,000. 00 TIME DEPOSIT, MID-STATE BANK 14 . 25% Interest, Matures 05/17/81 $ 200, 000. 00 TIME DEPOSIT, MID-STATE BANK 14 . 75% Interest, Matures 07/23/81 $ 100,000. 00 TOTAL $ 1,140,698. 93 CERTIFICATION I, RALPH H. DOWELL, JR. , do hereby certify declare that the demands enumerated and referred to in the foregoing regis- ter are accurate and just claims against the City and that there are funds available for payment thereof in the City Treasury. .D RALPH H. DOWELL, JR. Finance Director CQUNFERSIGN D: M RRAY . WARDEN, City Manage RECEIVED LISTING FEBRUARY 1, 1981 TO FEBRUARY 28, 1981 TAXES Sales Taxes $ 70,000. 00 Property Trangfer Tax 2,218 . 00 Property Tax 9,510. 49 Miscellaneous Tax 2,855. 04 LICENSE/PERMITS 6 , 842. 22 FINES/PENALTIES 100. 00 REVENUE/RENTS Investments 6 ,956 .25 Rents & Concessions 2,524. 24 Miscellaneous 155.50 REVENUE/AGENCIES Vehicle "In Lieu" 32 , 384 . 52 Cigarette Tax 5, 950. 01 Highway Carrier 1, 160. 07 Dial-A-Ride Farebox 1,108. 75 P.O.S.T. Reimbursement 842 .64 Miscellaneous 2 ,407 . 29 CHARGES FOR CURRENT SERVICES 7 ,651. 28 GAS TAX 13,685. 22 RECREATION 2 , 119. 65 MISCELLANEOUS 162 . 83 TOTAL $ 168 ,634. 00 -2- ATA5CtOEP0 PAGE NO. 1 DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. DATE 02/06/81 PAYEE WARRANT CHECK VOUCHER NO. DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTEN DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTCHG'D INV.NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT T Vc;CAt)FR0 uc 877 •,,;TTCC PUBLIC HEIR 730111 ^1. -4110-247 -7116 11 .97 877 ',i0TICz' PII�iLJC HEAP V,,AP AT01-4110-2'17 -748 i(', C, ) 877 NiOTICF P1JP4_IC HEAt 2 78011 1 01-411lI-247 —7117 ll .Q7 877 ] 2 MONTH Br;PSCPTPT 07-11108-210 1219k0 13.00 4651 47 .42 Al ASCAFIrPt? 13877 '$PLACE r,AG FTLTE:? 05-4401.224 12244 1?. 01 4052 12.01 i i j ^ Ta IITIiAI_ v�.T1=G C0 '4876ATER 19-70Cs:) 01-4202-232 F?11Q31 70.83 �976 +.ATER 16-1009 01 —IL202-27F 012081 40.00 r�3876 ;A.1PP P-353000 01-4004-23P 010281 22,50 "S77 t ATFR 13—A,2? )00 . 1-4404-232 012181 45.114 x3877 i!ATEP 17-49000 01-4404—?3? 0121 '31c'�.?�5 `38770TFq 9 s� 01-41104-23? 01.0581 210.45 3877 4T' A a.. <r1c;,i0(? F}l—t�afii5—'�? ()1.0281 104,57 3877 I;i,T=:1 ?—;450th) 01-4405-2—A? 010231 4.00 140513 522.74 i A;-F;RiC,3;;, P,PIST,' L T .1011 TRTrS 1++3877 POI TFJrn.TTOr° I7APTQT0GF 01-4?0=-215 6037 69.03 4054 69.03 I A11TOr,�4T [C AI_AP^l8 111! 877 PES: 4 tIAr-C*-I AL4RN" SE!%V 01-4405-216 07600 20.00 11055 20.00 877 F [ :.,NTP FBF 7`)'') ()1-440t;-P02 192725 ?50.1)0 4096 250.00 I' j R Fri 1JFPPI1\!TT `:.' 3,976 H:L?II L `, F:, 01-4117-209 5904 44.2 ':5876 LUF=LIi;ES 01-41101—?10 6015 18.70 3876 Iii_Uc.LT;,)ES 01. -4441 —P10 6 005 11 . 13 3876 34_!!FLT `,F Tsf3g 41 -4401—?1n 5905 7 . 111 3876 1 LJELTt'F ; 01-4401-210 ` ?01 15 . 1` 3A76 ;Gl LS FI_t,G! T` i, i1 —�t4:)1 ..?11.1 t-D ? 5t) ;3876 T 01 -44rl—?1 ) 6143 2,81 4057 101 .77 • —3— i A T A S C^[1 E t) PAGE NO. 2 DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. DATE DATE 02/06 ji a--- PAYEE WARRANT CHECK N0.NO. DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTEN DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTCHG'D INV.NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT I H AUTO PUTS, TP C 76 11PER PRISTLL 01-4402-21.5 15429 4.09 4055 4 .09 * 9 TLL' rLAWKERSHTP 176 LAMP `ODULE5 01-42KI-210 6521 60.42 405q 60.42 * .fPO4TEO PUTLCING IP;:SPECTI^ 76 COATNACT RUTLIDING Ih8PTP 01-4110-224 1 /81 1177 .00 4060 1177 .00 * CHTCAGO GPADE LANDFILL 05 DUAP T(;A3W 01-440!-217 127551 2.00 4061 0.00 * GT OF CALIF DEPT OF JUSTICE 156 FI gFPPRI TS-ST0 PFwW1RE 01-420t-224 6. 1. 0 P1845 6. 10 �al.-T'- .c;:�5_OIGTI�LCT 5 7k 2a CPr;NAMY 01-4110-208 1165 174.nl 4062 174 ; COUdr mar 17h :: LC ;;,PROv. 01-4405-221 6945 62.50 4063 62.54 * 56 sTCYCLF LICE' SES 01.-4.202-210 10. 00 P1848 10. 30 * DAILY PRESS 45 WECOF4TlOn DIP AD 1 /1 101-4102-?48 175 401COI IG TARPTP 40 1 /3-1 /01-4102-248 24.00 4064 42.40 * 5 CnH LLI;9ER 170 175 s2 MY 01-4402-217 J6604 ?4. 17 75 DITILL SIT ?: PUNCH Ot-6402-217 J504 18.37 <75 LAG`, 311ELPO fi, AIL5 01-4AV-217 16001 7 .25 Ila p!•wNn 01-4Url�P16 J6943 2.20 4065 51 .99 • -4- AT� SCA,iF' 'iI PAGE NO. 3 EMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 61-0t 1 DATE 02/06/81 PAYEE WARRANT CHECK N0.. /OUC DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTEN DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTCHG'D INV.NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT ,TE`lF ,i ,I ')0!iMASS, &D. 875 PHYSICAL - FLLIPTT 01-4202-224 011981 45.00 4066 45.00 DATAPPTNT C'OPP 375 DgAFTIOG $UaPLIcS C1-4101-210 78 575 17 .94 4067 17.94 _XX05 CC USA 874 GtSOLTNE W-P05-040-0 01-02OP-219 0119ji 553.£4 874 GAMLT"E 01.-4492-P19 011981 117 .80 A70 GASOLIW 1 1VP09-940-0 01-6404-ply 4119131 78.ao 4068 755.04 L C001% PUTLDINg SUPPLY 870 ROOFING " ATEPTALS 01-4405-217 15540 77 .91 4069 77 .91 ICK FLISARPAPA.S 9XCAVATIO°I 87a 4QUIPiPEOT RITNTAL 01 -4602-309 81-32 329.40 40717 329.40 QISANTl HAM' AK 863 LIQUID WIVE ICH '. wg4Q 01-4202-215 4554 863 Irl.ST.n-L5=M 01-4202-215 o5725 12.4C, 863 RFO W aI"IT 01-4202-216 05645 6.57 863 FLOOPFSCENIT LAIP.S 01-4401-210 05654 7 .63 Rha KOTS, BOLTS, ^.IASHFPS 01-u40r-217 00581 34.39 1363 LAlTFP,'-J 1-4405-216 .15755 22.95 574 TnGkE aOLTS 01-4405-216 09652 3.32 ala ANC!-aon t m rs 01-4405-?16 09696 1 .65 874 !SITS 01-4405-2.16 05691 16.26 87» COnCPFTF WaILS til-Craps-216 09703 1 .93 F74 LIGHT 001-03 01-4405-216 05739 7 .9() 871 FUSES Ol -dU05-216 05753 7 .48 513 BATTERIES 01 -0u05-217 05755 8. 15 P67 KEY Q0PI_II76TT&I 07-4108-P1? 05615 .A5 4071 136.28 'Lc 'S RFRATP R7a VA('UU0 RFP. IR 01 -4400-215 28516 285.64 4072 286.64 IF" AUTO PART F70 LIGHT', 01-4201-303 1542 47 ,03 -5- ilT4SCA:FicPU PAGE NO. 4 DEMAND/WARRANTREGISTER NO. i1 -061 DATE 02/06/ 1 PAYEE WARRANT CHECK N0.. UC DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTEN DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTCHG'D INV.NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT 7`4 AIPFR gFFILLS 01-4202-215 1113 5.24 7t1 PARTS 01.-402-215 1436 7 .04 4073 59.31 VNERAL SVCS DOCHHEtJT SECTI.r? 56 5000 "CAL LAPS, YOUTH OFFIT01-4iOl-209 2.90 P1.646 2.90 J/0 PET FPS ,, •i,3 qEQ MIOAT, 141 'AL F?nB 01-4ul}h-pio !TOT 525.00 a074 825.00 *. 1 . J . 0 AUT010TIVF 53 rT-1 TUTA -UP I TRANS 05-4401-224 589 50 .00 ,.03 AT-1 TUNIT-IJP . R. TRAM 05-4401 -224 563 124.83 4075 174.88 J TRUCKING 63 HAULING COLD `'SIX 05-4002-224 495-41 83.60 4076 83.60 K41SEP SA90 AND GRAVFL , . �62 ASPHALT O1-440P-217 168314 205.50 163 ASPHALT 01 -4dO2-217 168313 139.72 vii A5PH4LT 01 -0402-217 167290 1013.26 i62. TOP SOIL 01-440d-217 170898 14 .P5 4077 1373.53 JERRY LUhCK - PULLIOZING 162 FOUIGMFIVT RENTAL 01-4mov-309 1550 1127 .39 4078 1127.30 29 0 PHOTOGRAPHY 42 FILM PROCESSING 01-4261 -210 1611 4.29 32 FTLM PQOCFSSIHG lit=4201-210 IF29 14.31 � 162 FILM PIOCESSIPG 01 -4201 -210 1839 29.68 4079 48 .28 ROBERT MOORF �6? SMEP GARDFI. LAWN 01-4404-301 STMT 736.00 4080 738.00 YOTUROLA VC 40 9 PAGER'S 01-4242-104 14551 1790. 38 4081 1799.33 t -6- aTSCA(lE�?0 PAGE NO. 5 EMAN D/WARRANT REGISTER NO. '1 -0 1 DATE 02/06/81 PAYEE WARRANT CHECK ]OCHER NO. DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTEN DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTCHG'D INV.NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT THE OUTLET CO i6? 945n+`iV?Y RIT SFT fl-44(}5..221 'T1T 7,95 4()82 7.95 ACIFIC GAS k EL1=CTg!C, 161 TFRP2-ooao1-4 ST-FFT LIT`=+11-t;uG2-227 0131AI 3705,72 +61 TPRPti-00701-1 LAKE LITIES 01-a404-227 0131.Al 55.26 403-4 3760.48 � 34CIFIC TFLFPHONP `hl `^7-466-��440-53'1-I'I PHOiNI 01-4142-228 012081, 290 . 36 x.45-ubr-hF00-869->,I PHoNp 01-4102-228 012081 273.1»' ,61 •?05-466- 000-534..0; PI-Irj'tiF 01-4110;-228 002-1)81 290 .36 kO5-466-6600-869-n, PH(),,; r> 1-ta2n2-?2c2 012081 125.00 162 Rn5-466-2141 -136-N PHniIF 01-4?0?-228 012081 202.27 ?62 u4PH0 E i? 011981 27 . 10 '.61 205-466-c,000-934-N PHO�jE 01-4401-228 012081 64„53 ?6? ?05-86r,-QO37-360-;I P H 0 N,E A1-4dC0-2?R 012081 17 .96 16 05-466-1;17 '19PI~n p 01-4405-228 412081 37 . 15 6 865-466-7x73-50q-, PNO ;E 05-4401-P24 01.2081 112.03 4034 1439.50 taPNR 'V(lFx5 ,S60 PF,�S0r°f•!EL CARDS 01-4102-210 5 T m T 31 .811 4085 31 .80 FTf.RS�lr;'S ,vFLPF!r, SHOP ,60 2 1/2" PrRr 01 -4202-pl5 09045 5.50 4086 5.50 � .PTF JOHN80r. CHFVQOLFT `63 TIJ�'•iF UP s'`I 'A.1ro ' nl-4402-215 41,655 21 .68 4087 21 .68 'OULTRY!.,"FivS C00P 4.55CC FOC., 1182 73.78 .61 "AHIYAL FOOT) )1.•Ltii 1..210 21776 IIa.61 61 4r`I fAI_. F0,", i , 1-41104-210 19394 p0 . t46 40:'18 208.65 ,4CIFIC Piit•+P Tr.Pr f.>>iF;,lFNT CI)vT TAPP F. c F ,"1 ; ;:f� 9 I , T F : T F� � �, � 1 - 3 4-217 _0,�y83,a �;. 1 -7- ATGSlE PAGE NO.• 6 DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 1-1181 DATE 02/06/8 PAYEE WARRANTCHECK LICHER NO. DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTEN DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CHG'D INV.NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT A R00F CEVENT v, TAPF 01-4404-217 208866 10.90 ?h0THRE'SHF)L1OS (111-14A05-217 20: 950 4.9E 0. 6STI�JPT ,G-rLEVATOP. 01-11405-217 208944 19.06 60 CI.FklATI?p TILE. 01-4405-217 206917 27 .98 10189 97 .84 STAR I"'"1 SEPk/ 60 I_In1TFI)pio8 ni-aal)2-0209 5116972 12.92 ;6,1 luPIS til-4402- 05 531253 Ip.9c 51 I+r)I�i�R•a�, 4u 02-20S z9u05 12,92 ;61t'r;IF0pvig ril"402-205 4392?1 12.92 tr,q tl;.IjFtic',.S ti 1�11ziO4-209 646,372 12.92 ,8r1 tl"-JI IF00r.,1S r, 1-4tIna-2$5 531253 12.92 •'64 ;J vIF+Cq?.lS 01-r1 04-2,05 ::39405 1 ;?.92 61 1j,'IF=0P;,'S 01-4404-205 439221 12.92 60 U01F( R!,'S r►1s4&05-205 6 It6i?72 8. 16 60 UPJIr0P ^S 01-11405-2O5 531253 8. 16 6?. ..►fJIFCP;'S 01-4409-?05 339405 8. 15 5� ,Jr.,i1F 0R1-i$ 01-4409-205 1139221 f;. 16 4090 136.00 F•t S 1 F F►+F 1`f 5 1�i • .59 P1.11I; C; cCkil`"t; 01-4110-224 STmT -40q5 11091 309.35 SA",! LI IS FSA Ip. TS 59 PA111T THI...,!,JF 17 01-4445-216 A052-64 10.31 • 9 ?Ail:T 6 R;iSNES C11-l"405-221 A05272 17 .28 402 27 .59 401 JG4�ITrl; sIJPF'I_Y CO. �)0 �74UFFEP PA(IS 01-0405-217 076358 93. 03 4093 93.08 91F`11.0"71 CTTT7F,'%I ' 5 UNlITF 11, 50 TYAVFL• "tILERt^F J l,-ItJAkY 01-4301-257 1/81 100.00 4094 100.00 -!I;'4 CITTFS rCia lJNTTY P!()SPIT 59 X-RAYS cL l_I')TT 01 -4a;i2-224 011981 93. 00 4()95 98.00 50 41111 'AL Fo} ,;) F93175 13?.56 • -8- AT ^SC�DERI� PAGE NO. 7 EMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. '1"x"1 DATE 02/06/81 Q PAYEE WARRANT CHECK N OUC DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTEN DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTCHG'D INV.NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT -�459 A1•.1Ti4L F000 01-4404-Plo -93466 132,56 4096 265. 12 "'ESTEPN OFFTCF PP00UCTS INC RS?? VTCT,,)R VTS43LF U^ITT 17954 52.00 858 OFFTCt SUF'PLIFS 01-41L2-212 17656 61 ,541 'q55 VICTOR VIS451-F t'^IIT 91-4106-210 17954 51 .99 R5P OFFICE SUPpLI>" 01-4106-212 17656 23.05 A5A '',iAI'"lE PI_ATF--9Hr. ER 11-4110-210 17840 11 .43 r,cg STORAGIE DRA�JFR 1-4110-210 17795 13.74 n5a FX?A-',,IDlNG FILE 91-4110-212 17500 15.59 x+56 CAT:>L() F"'VFLOPFS 01-4iln-?12 17780 25. 19 :ASF ;-)I✓F.IC SUPaLIFS 01-4110-212 1741. 1 53.85 ejsF OFFICE 5'IPPI_I1 S 91-4201 -212 17595 146. 15 ?'59 c)FFICE SIJPPL_IFS 01-4201.-212 17575 64. 49 ,.150 OFeICE 9I.IPPLTES 01-4?01-2.1? 17576 85. 16 S59 CiFF ICF SUPPL IFS 91-4291-212 17803 51 .73 358 OFFIC` SU?FLIFS i)1-4rt)?_-?12 1765{{ 15.38 855 OFFTCF SUPPLIES 91-41!{`1-212 17654 61 .53 359 OFFTCF SUPP►_ I^ 01-41191-212 17634 11 .59 i)FFTCF 5i)f'PL1ES fit-1:401-212 17333 2.4 UFFICE 5I_1PPLIFS 01 -4401-212 17936 7 ,uu .Sq ()FPTrti SLIPPL1ES 01-4401-?12 15015 11 .87 358 OFr TCF 3IIPPL1F,5 91-4140u-212 17654 3.85 A5R )Fh ICr SUPPLIES ?7-4106-212 17655 19.23 4097 792.81 ^'ALSH SECURTTY U)C,'K SHOP R5K r?IJP KEYS FII._F CAB 1-421)1-242 640 :3.42 4098 3.4c =I,,GI ;YERTilJr & SAFETY 3FPVICE AS S"ECIAL U-'TER-FST l'()SLISH 91-11202-299 10.00 1`1847 10.00 TE 0"'TFF"sI;O0r) ?5o r1FFl;i'�l? F'7 ; 0VF-PCHAF?C,F I)I�:tlnl-3200-Or O 3 7 $11.0(1 1+59 REF (1'In FUk 0V1- •'CHARGF, W'1001-3600-030 3F7 5.00 4099 89.00 _ 1:1_LT ,ii (;AVIS 875 PI- ?; rT tZtSS I)AVI;i 91-3200-o29 155 146 . 001 375 nPFIInIL> PFW1` TT 1155 [;AVIF 0, 1 -3P0()-()30 155 61 . 00 -9- pT!SCarF '0 PAGE NO. 8 DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. DATE 0 2 ©6 1 PAYEE WARRANT CHECK !OCHER NO. DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTEN DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTCHG'D INV.NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT "T5 !?Ft=tl ,s, PFP? SIT 4159 PAVIS 01-32.1}0-9410 155 21.95 '`75 r?FFlll.:r PF;MTT X155 0AVIS (11 -3200-1511 155 11 .00 '75 PFFLlNI) PEP`-lTT P155 rAVIS 01-3600-0-30 155 3Pl.50 '75 KFFLl"l °EP"IT ;: 155 OAVIS 01-3600-1c14 155 2. 12 t4100 251 .57 —10— ATASCADERO PAGE NO. 9 40 MAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 81` 1 DATE 02/06/81 PAYEE WARRANT CHECK NO. DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTEN DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTCHG'D INV.NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT NPITTEN 18244.55 PEPAID 29.00 ACCRUED .00 0TAL 18273.55 RECAP av PI_lrin RE-PAIP WRITTEI`J FUND 01 29. 00 17828 .95 F'IIN0 ;5 .00 382.52 FIJ^.�0 07 . 00 33.08 -11- ATASCADERO 1 PAGE NO. DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 81-082 DATE 02/21 PAYEE WARRANT CHECK )OCHER NO. DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTEN " DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTCHG'D INV.NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT A TA:SCADE.Ro �;EvIJS 381 LEGAL AD )ASHbUR,"i 01-4110-247 F'751 13.h8 381 LEGAL aD SCOLART 01 -4110-r?47 1=752 27,60 4167 41 .28 RTAS FEDERAL CREDIT U ION' 379 CREDIT UNICI`s DEPOSITS 01-2160-0015 021131 742.30 P1851 742,30 Y A.TASCADERe POLTC=' AS50CIATI 379 POLICE ASSOC DUES 01-2160-004 021181 90.00 P1854 90.00 3 3 E SAVER CO 381 TRAFFIC PAINT 41-4402-217 205501 63.21 4168 63,21 s f ICHAEL P. CURRAN, M.D. )$6 X—RAYS—V ELLIOTT U1-4202-224 020545 49,00 416q 49.00 � CALIF SAFEG11rkD SPECIALISTS • X31 ST UCTL1RE GLi)VcS 01-4242-210 22791 228.96 4170 228,96 L �' CUPTTS N SOPS 368 SVA CI—AiMPS 01 -4PU2-210 U7(,546 69. 12 -67 SVA CLAPPS 01-4212-215 074536 9. 15 387 8 r3i1L6S FOR LIGHT 01-4202-221 077773 31 .46 4171 109.33 CO�,'F-I TRANSIT SERVSr I ryC 381 DIAL-,A-RIf)E !NSURANCE 05-4401-224 2045 5262. 11 4172 5262. 11' � CITY-Ln- FEE? CREDIT UNIOi 179 CREDIT I},\!IQN DEPOSIT 01 -2160-005 021131 62.50 P1852 62.50 � CALIF POLICE CHIF-FS ASSOC 81 Y)F 'i�ERSHIR DUES-liC HALE () 1-4201-202 1981 25. 00 417= 25.00 K,1Rc�\i CLA," I,. -79 CO!- TiiiCT T` STR CLANIN 000-07-/4108-221 9a.`a0 P1862 94.50 -12- ATA5CADERO PAGE NO. 2 EMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 81-01;-12 DATE 02/20/81 PAYEE WARRANT CHECK ]UNER DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED > WRITTEN N0. DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTCHG'D INV.NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT BETSY CROSSUi, 330 CONTKACT INSTP CROSSON PA07-410:3-224 139.00 P1863 189.00 CALIF RUPAL FIRE ASSCC 351 ANNUAL DUES-5YLVIA 01-4202-202 1981 8. 00 4174 8.00 RALPH H . DO:^TELL JR 379 REIMS TRAVEL SANTA CLARA 01-4106-203 73.20 379 REI96 TRAVEL SANTA CLARA 01-4106-206 121 .44 P1855 194.64 IOIETERICH—POST CO 381 CLEAR PRINT PAPER 01-4401-210 15907 29. 13 4175 29. 13 36 r" CULVEKT I 15ANDS 01-4402-217 000146 253.74 4176 253.74 Dc MEDICAL SUPPLY 381 MEDICAL SUPPLIES 01-4202-210 1034 76. 11 4177 76. 11 EAPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT 373 ST WITHHOLDING JAN 01-2160-002 0181 2232.00 P184 , 2232.00 EXXON CO USt. 381 GA60LIOE 132-005-859-9 01-'4202-219 1/di 9.67 4178 9.67 RICK ELISARRARAS EXCAVATION 382 PREFOPYANCr BOND REFUND 01-3500-090 7436 250 .00 i81 BACKHOE 4EUTAL RTAS CREEKOI-44 j2-309 61-33 178.20 $82 BACKhOE WEQTAI_ ROADS 01-4402-310 61-45 445.50 417 873.70 FL CAKINO CAR +n+ASH 082 1 CAR WASH JAS; 01-4402-2.10 STMT 3.00 41:30 3.00 —13— ATASCADFRO PAGE NO. 3 DEMAND/WARRANT REG ISTERNO. 81-0"32 DATE 02120 1 PAYEE !UCHER WARRANT CHECK N0. DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED > WRITTEN DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTCHG'D INV.NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT ELECTRIC SUPPLY OF PASO R08L 382 LIGHT 3ULc3 � FLCR TURES 01-4405-217 6825 167.81 4181 167. 81 * VE RNON EtL I OTT : 378 RE IP,+S CLASS REG ELLIOTT 01-4202-236 35.00 P1665 35.00 * THE ECONO;-lIC PRF—SS INC � 1 300K "BITS is PIECES" 01-4202-234 913087 9.23 4182 9.23 * ALLEN GRIMES ;E32 t•tE�;6ERSRIP DUES TRI-COLI'N 0,1-4103-202 ST;vIT 20 .00 X32 PROFESSIONAL SERV 1 /1-1/ 01-4143-224 STIgT 1800.00 413. 1820.00 ALEXANDER GRA^,!T e. CO 82 EXTRA DETAIL LEDGER 1 /81 01-4301-239 (12096 25. 00 418 2 - GENERAL ELECTRIC CO 82 GESKON � 2 REPIOTE UNIT 05-4401-224 6066111" 361 .46 4185 361 .46 ri:^tY 31(:i; & SUPPLY CO 82 STI-?EET SIGNS 01-4402-217 801054 1782.79 82 STREET SIGNS 01-4402-217 81-73 32. 17 82 STREET SI( ivS 01-4402-217 61-58 222.03 418E 2036.99 HALPRIN SUPPLY CO 67 BOUTS, STEEL Ti)E 01 -4202-212 1-i116,�4 222,.28 67 ELECTP-IC Er!Gf-1AVER 01-4402-217 448le"O 13.62 87 JUTS, ;BASHERS, SCREWS, FT01-4402-217 4 117 90 7 72.44 37 NOOKS -& Fl.' DEP CHAINS 01-4402-217 4483h8 6A.70 4187 377.04 HAP'RIS INDUSTgIES INC 82 bAKRICAUF_ TAPE 01-4201 -PIO 0333 29,r)0 32 BA;--dRICADt: TAPE 01-4, 02-210 u333 51 .9{ 41 (i£. 60.93 • -14— 1 ATASCADERO PAGE NO. MAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 81–C�8?_ DATE 02/20/81 PAYEE WARRANT CHECK CHER DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTENi" ,gyp DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTCHG'D INV.NO. AMOUNT NO. ..AMOUNT. -- I�iT 'L BLISI`IF_SS }IACHIN'Ets COR :z} 82 MEMORY TYPE :RI TER 01-41012-302 H55315 230.87 83 TYPEt,RITERS 3/1 – 5/31/8101-41Qc--302 41235 133.56 83 TYPE :RITrRS 3/1 – 5:131/13101-410,�-306 412355 105.75 83 TYPP-4PiTERS 3/1 5,/31/8101-411'0-301 412355 112.89 33 TYPE ,RITERS 3/1 – 5//31 /5101-4110-301 *12355 128.54 83 TYPEaRITERS 3/ 1 5//31/8101-4201-301 412355 105.75 = 33 TYFE�vRITERS 3/ 1 – 5//31/6101-4201-301 412355 112.89 - 52 COPY MACHIr!E P, COPIES 01-4301-303 H55316 1437 .29 4�� 83 TYPE4''RITcRS 3/1 – fi/31/ si(�i-4401-2111 412355 122.44 4189 2489:x– _* TNT 'L CITY 1'4A"}AI;FN'FT',A 5 5 0 C _ 83Inai4AGE;fE iT Ii,}FO SERV 01-4102-209 014947 ILO .00 419C 180.'(30 �t EVELYiti Ir},RA;r 7.9 C014TRACT IC"ISTR I- GRAM PAI07-41G8-221 168.00 P1861 168.6 ` TN( ?•iAS JARAMILL�� 79 REIIA:3 FXPE1SE SAiV JOSE 8/01-4201-236 81 .33 P1857 81 .3 J/D PET FOOD .O 33 RED MEAT–ZOO FOOT) 01-4404-210 2311 466.40 4191 466.46 "* J.J . 'S AIJTCi�!OTIVr At; 33 T! +vE–UP k, TRAI"ISI-iISSION CK0 5-4401-224 596 175.83 419" 175 83 KAISEN- SAND AND G`lAVEL 83 PRICE VICREASE CHARGES 01-41402-217 5293 183.27 4193 183.27 LEAGUE OF CHLIFORNIA CEITIES 83 "AP• UAL 01-4103-209 5317 15.90 419LI 15.94 * LUC:1S PRTI,JIi'}G 83 2 PAiiT mE:SSAGF- FOP :1S 01-4102-210 c391 42.40 –15 ATASCM)ERO 5 PAGE NO. DEMAND/WARRANT REG[STE R NO. 81-062 DATE 02/20/ PAYEE WARRANT CHECK' CHER DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESFNTED WRITTEN 'J 0. DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTCHG'D INV.NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT 33 ALARM REP**T BOOKS 01-4202-205 267 79.50 4195 121 ,90 JERRY LUECK BULLDOZING 64 STREET S :EP_Pl,!G 05-4402-224 1557 525„ 00 4196 525.00 JERRY LARRIS0 ,I 7`? REIMS EXPFySE SAINTA NARIA01-4201-236 33.42 P1856 33.42 LANDVAUK ENTERPRISE: iia SURV.EYIi\IG BOOKS 01-4401-309 1733 29.95 4197 29.95 MID-:STATE' RANK J4 POLICE Cts °t LOAN 01-4201-224 2/81 1490 .34 4198 1490.84 r�Il?-51'AZF i3n��,;� 79 FED NIThhQLDI-' G TAX 01-2160-001 021181 6405. 07 P1553 64050 14ISSTON LINEN SUPPLY 3R DUST '-lOP 01-4202-211 0911A 1 .75 :illi !OUST 1,110P 01-4202-211 0904A 1 .75 48 DUST ,*,0P 01-4202-211 0897x. 1 .75 38 DUST N 0P 01-4202-211 0890A 1 .75 39 DUST N;OP 01-4202-211 0987A 1 .75 3%9 :OUST .NOP 01-4202-211 O994A 1 .75 39 DUST MOP 01-4202-211 1001A 1 .75 38 SHOP TrO`.'iELS 01-4202-215 0904A 4.50 38 SHOP TO'NELS 01-4202-215 0890A 10 .20 39 SHOP TONtLS 01-4202-215 0987A 4.50 39 ShOP Tr ,FLS 01-4202-215 1001A 4,50 Is COVERALLS 01-42'02-242 0911A 4 .71 38 COVERALLS 01-4202-242 0904A 4.93 38 COVERALLS ()' 1-420r?-242 0897A 4,71 38 COVERALLS 01-4202-242 0,390A 5.22 3 9 COVEPALLS 01-4PQ2-242 0987A 4.93 3r4 COVERALLS () 1-14202-242 U994A 4 . 71 i9 COVEgALL5 01-4202-242 1001A 4.93 38 DIS► TiI;�.ELS 01-4262-250 U911.0 5. 93 • -16- ATASCADERO PAGE NO. 6 AND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 31-082 DATE 02/20/81, PAYEE WARRANT CHECK HER DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED > WRITTEN 7. DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTCHG'D INV.NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT ,-3 DISH TON-ELS 01-4202-250 09046 3.53 ,g DISH TO'l-ELS 01-4202-250 08973 . 3.53 d OISH TOrr:LS 01-4202-250 0890B 3.53 o DISH TOhELS 01-4202-250 09676 :1.53 9 DISH TOAELS 01-4202-250 09948 3.53 ;4 DISH TOWELS 01-4202-250 10015 3.62 4199 97. 19 AOBIL OIL CREDIT CORP 4 GASOLINIE 883-930-756-1 01-4110-219 2/81 3 .1.69 14 fASOLII'jE F83-930-756-1 01-4201-219 2/61 51 .59 14 GASOLINE 883-930-756-1 01-4402-219 2/81 28.75 ;4 GASOI-PPE 883-930-756-1 05-4401-224 2/61 947 .34 4200 1058.37 "•'AT 'L INSTITUTE OF HUNICIPAL s4 ANNUAL DUES-GRI`•+ES 3/81 01-4103-202 218.00 4201 218.00 * NO CO FIRE PROT;CTICU :4 RECHARGE FIRE EXTG 01-4201-224 10540 20 .25 4202 20 .25 * OLIVEI� & i dILLIA •;S 74 ELEVAT04 MIAI'JT 2/91 1-42901-4405-224 61 .25 4203 61 .25 * 0 J 'S OUTFITTERS 14 TARGETS 01-4201-304 004330 5.25 42011 5.25 PACIFIC GAS x, ELECTRIC . )5 ELECTRIC J3R47-25202-5 01-4201-229 02ugdl 17.56 15 ELLCTRZIC H6R-33-10600-4 ill-4202-227 020661 173.99 ,5 ELECTRIC T�RP2-00801w4 01-4-%�)?-227 613181 1851.86 C 01-444S EL - -227 x204+31 1 .82 :5 ELECTRIC F5R8;s-24203-6 01-4404-227 02o461 252.45 5 ELECTRIC F3K51 -00302-0 01-4404-227 OP-0461 2.06 �9 ELECTRIC +4IR36-08406-9 01-4404-227 020681 1 .75 ,5 ELECTRIC Ti-.RP4-00701-1 01-4404-227 013181 55.26 ,5 ELECTRIC N�;R3a-00602-3 01-4405-227 020681 87.40 :5 ELECTRIC W�iR38-00202-7 01-4405-227 020681 573.72 4205 (!3D018-8 -17 ATASCADERO PAGE NO. 7 DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 1-082 DATE 02/20 (& UCHPAYEE WARRANT CHECK NO. DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTEN DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CHG'D INV.NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT PACIFIC TELEPHON17 584 PHONlc" 238-451-8031-877-N 01-4201-228 020761 15.00 184 PHONE 236-451-8032-141- 01-4201-228 020761 15.00 i84 PHONE 233-451-8033-201-0 01-4201.-228 020781 15.00 t84 PHONE 233-451-80314-176-N 01-4201-228 020781 15.04 1164 PHONE 238-451-5138-?24-N 05-44,11-224 020701 15.00 4206 75.00 } PUBLIC EI.PLOYEE 'S RETIRE SYS i79 HETIREAENT COtiT`~IBUTION 01-2160-000 0109" 1 8675. 16 P185 8675. 16 PETTY CASH CITY TPEASURER 178 UNL)ER FAYi- ENT ON P1830 01-41U1-206 324 .?_0 ;78 POSTAGE OLE-PETTY CASH 01-4102-204 323 .26 178 COAFERENCE-PETTY CASH 01-4102-206 325 7.50 >78 COFFEE Room PETTY CASH 01-4102-210 329 3.48 i78 INTERVIEN HO ARD LUNCH 01-4102-210 328 12.31 173 GREYHOUND PETTY CASH 01-4105-204 322 3.55 ?78 UPS PETTY CASK 01-4106-204 327 3.63 178 UPS PETTY CASH 01-4201-204 327 1 .513 ',78 POSTAGE TO FIRE ACAD' PETTOI 4202-20d 326 2.25 t78 `3LEACH ZOO GE PETTY CA01-4404-210 321 8,78 178 ANIMAL FOOD PETTY CASH 01-4404-210 330 31 .78 P1850 Rt=TERSON'S YIELD UNG SHOP {35 1 YARD OF CON!C;RETE 41"'k4402-217 4973 54.27 4207 54.27 POIJLTRY?-+ENS COOP- ASSOC 385 ZOO FOOD k BEDDING, 01-4404-2.10 21234 32.52 4208 32.52> � ANN PRIEST -86 CONTRACT INSTRUCTOR-PRIES 07-4108-224 E/81 1311 .72 4209 1`311 .72 ITY OF 'SAN LUIS OBISPO 178 FEi PUA! Y r•IEDICAL PN'T 01-2160-003 4572.09 P1867 4572.05 � ELLIOTT O STEPHF,,JSON '86 PLAfq CHECKING 01-4110-224 1181. 462. 32 4210 462.62 -18 - ;- ATASCADERO PAGE NO. 8 EMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 81-082 DATE 02/20/81 JCHPAYEE WARRANT CHECK NO. DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTEN N0. > DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTCHG'D INV.NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT SO CA GAS CO 85 GAS 07-4973-976-32011-5 1/01-4202-230 69.77 85 GA509-4942-235-0153-4 1/101-4404-230 37 .142 85 GFS 07-4978-972-7502-1 1/01-4405-230 823.71 4211 930.90 * SAN LUIS OBISPO CO ENGINEER 31:6 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINIT 05-4402-224 1/81 977 .81 4212 977 .81 * SUPER SEVEN GASOLIN€ $b , GASOLIi,,E 901-514-1270 1/101-4201-219 244 .41 4213 244.41 * S,',IEE S IhlC 86 OLD 60ILER SERVICE CALL 01-4405-301 A7207 116.49 4214 116.49 * URVEYORS SERVICE CO'0PANY SUKVEYIi'-IG ECUIPPENT 01-4401-309 6179 691 . 17 4215 691 . 17 * "ICHAEL SNERER '78 REIM16 PLANINING CONIF EXP 201-4110-246 106.34 P1866 106.34 * It SAN LUIS 081SPO COUNTY AREA }86 ', I\'SURAf!CE SENIOR CIT7_N CA01-4301-257 STMT 427.00 4216 427 ,00 SO CALIF JUVENILE OFF ASSOC ,86 DUES—J H.ARLWA 01-4201-2012 ST IT 5.00 4217 5.00 TELEGRAM—TRIbU E 13:6 Ata — CAUIL:Ir:G I115PT 01-4102-248 59104 38.40 d4a AO BUILI)ING I N 5 P T 01-4102-249 59103 40.60 86 AD RECkEAT IOJ,I DIRCT 01-4102-248 58280 33.60 66 AD RECD<EATIO •' DIRCT 01-4102-248 54102 31 .20 4218 144.00 TAYLOR RENTAL CENTER 87 RE �TAL-TRV SNISSInr, JACK 01-4202-214 011391 13.44 4219 13.44 -19- ATASCADERt; PAGE NO. 9 DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 81-082 DATE 02/20/8 PAYEE WARRANT CHECK HER DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED ) WRITTEN L_ DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTCHG'D INV.NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT TRANSCONTINENTAL SALES CO _ 7 2 PAIR SLOTS 01-42(: 2-2Q5 10934 170.69 ,7 UNIFORNS-ELLIOTT 01-4202-205 1'1933 274.57 4220 445.26 U S PUST OFFICE 9 POSTAGE FOR POSTAGE '. ETER61-41(12-2# 4 120.00 4POSTAGE FOR POSTAGE METER01-4110-204 60.00 P186C 200.00 UINION OIL CO OF CA 7 GASOLINE 1-0623-6920 01-4201-219 013051 1200.67 "7 GASOLINE 1_p623-6920 01-4'402-219 u13oS1 102.43 4221" 1303. 10 MURRAY L NAROEN '9 REI 13 EXPENSE S4ojTA CLARAOI-4102-203 73.20 4 NEI,-iia EXPENSE SANTA CLARA01-4102 206 204 ,71 P1858 277.91 NEST PURLI5HI AG CO 7 CALIF ANNOTATED CODE 01-4102-209 25634 54.06 7 CALIF ANNOTATED CODE 01-4POI-209 25534 108 . 12 4222 162.18 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE "7 MEDICAL SUPPLIES 01-4202-210 27.100 40.76 4223 40.76 SMITH TRAINSPORTATION 6 FHEIGHT FOR PAINT 06-014201-4472-217 15.62 4224 15.62 0iM,PLIT ICJI_IF' 1 PROGRAMMABLE CALCULATOR 01-4401-305 47583 500 .00 1 PROGRANiPlAn-l- CALCULATOR 01-4401-309 47533 125.02 4225 625.02 SANN f3ERNARDIf%)0 ;AUNICIPAL COI) _ 0 CASH GAIL DECEIVED SCOTT 01-34()0-030 ► 14791 155.50 P1664 155.50 _20 ATASCADE.KC, PAGE NO. 10 MAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 81-4? ATASCADERp PAGE NO. 11 DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. €31-0#'2 DATE 02121 PAYEE WARRANT CHECK N0.. -OUC DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTEN DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTCHG'D INV.NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT WRITTEN 30207 .46 PREPAID 24390.08 ACCRUED .00 TOTAL 54597 .54 RECAP BY FUND PRE-PAID NRITTEN FUND 01 23938.56 20599. 19 FUND Cis .00 8264.55 FUND 07 451 .50 1343.72 9 -22- ATASCADERO PAGE NO. 1 MAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 81-083 DATE 02/27/81 PAYEE WARRANT CHECK U0.. JC DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTEN DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CHG'D INV.NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT TASCADERO NEWS 00 LEGAL AD HAND & KING 01-4110-247 -756 12.72 00 LEGAL AD BARKSDALE 01-4110-247 -757 13.68 00 LEGAL AD MESSER & HUONG 01-4110-247 -765 13.68 00 LEGAL AD DAVIS 01-4110-247 -764 13,68 00 LEGAL AD ATAS JR WOMEN! CL 1-411-a-247 -770 14.88 00 LEGAL AD ATAS JR WOMEN CLOI -4110-247 `-769 13.68 00 LEGAL AD SALAYON 1-4110-247 -768 13.68 00 LEGAL AD ROCHELLE 1-4110-247 -767 17 .04 00 LEGAL AD MESSER & GRIMES 01-4110-247 -766 13.68 4228 126.72 TASCADERO F09D 00 LEASE PAYMENT-POLICE 1-4202-224 STMT 2989.62 4229 2989„62 TAS MUTUAL WATER CO 00 19-7000 NATER 01-4202-232 022081 26.85 00 17-45000 MATER 01-4404-232 022251 25.00 4230 51 .85 * TAS FEDERAL CREDIT UNION 96 CREDIT UNION DEPOSITS 01-2160-005 022581 942.30 P1878 942.30 * TASCADERO POLICE ASSOCIATIO 95 POLICE ASSOC DUES 01-2160-004 022581 90.00 P1879 90.00 * TASCADERO SANITATION 00 SEWER 1 /1 - 3/1 /81 001-0001-4202-251 20.00 00 SEttiER 1 /1-3/1/81 001-006801-4405-231 5,50 4231 25.50 AY TYPEPYRITER 00 REPAIR" CALCULATOR 01-4106-301 1531 45,00 4232 45,00 UREAU OF BUSINESS PRACTICE 01 EMPLOYEE RELATIONS BULTN 1-4102-234 052460 56.34 4233 56,34 A POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIV 96 "COMPARATIVE CITIES FINNAN 1-4106-234 ORM 14.00 P1876 14 .00 -23- ATASCADERO PAGE NO. .2 DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 81-083 DATE 02/2 PAYEE WARRANT CHECK HCHNO.ER DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTEN DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTCHG'D INV.NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT ATHI E PREDDY 501 GASOLINE 792-060-064-5 01-4202-219 022081 101 . 19 301 OIL 792-060-064-5 01-4262-220 022081 2.00 502 BUS WASHES 2/7/81 05-4401-224 714 20.00 302 BUS WASHES 2/21 & 2/22 5-4401-224 7715 20.00 4234 143.19 OMM TRANSIT SERVS, INC 501 BUS SERVICE 1 /12-1/16 05-4401-224 2090 1739.95 30,1 BUS SERVICE 1/19-1/23 5-4401-224 2091 1642,64 4235 3382059 ITY-CO FED CREDIT UNION ,996 CREDIT UNION DEPOSITS 01-2160-005 022551 62.50 P1877 62.50 DEPRRTMENr of MaT-oRVEAlCLP- 896 BICYCLE LICENSE 01-4202.210 90.00 P1868 90 00 RIMINAL JUSTICE ADMIN ASSOC 501 DUES 1/81-12/81 - MC HALE 1-4201-202 STMT 25.00 4236 25.00 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT 501 FEES STATE WITHHOLDING 1-2160-002 /S1 2104 .73 4237 2104.73 ICK ELISARRARAS EXCAVATION 501 REPAIR LAKE NATER SYSTEM 1-4404-217 1-53 576.E+0 4238 -576.60 IRESTONE STORES 501 REPAIR BEARINGS & BRAKES 1-4202-215 30307 25.10 501 TIRES & MOUNT 1-4202-223 30307 239.57 4239 -264.67 ALEXANDER GRANT & CO 501 COMPUTER SERVICE 2/81 1-4301-239 03079 576.04 4240 576.04 OPPER, INC 501 BINDERS & HOOKS 1-4402-217 448368 65.70 -24- ATASCADERO PAGE NO. 3 EMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 81-083 DATE 02/27/81 PAYEE WARRANT CHECK N0..OUC DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED > WRITTEN DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTCHG'D INV.NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT 501 SCREWS, NUTS, ETC 01-4402-217 -447907 72.44 301 ELECTRIC ENGRAVER 01-4402-217 448180 13.62 4241 154.76 HALPRIN SUPPLY CO 302 STEEL TOE BOOTS 01-42;82-242 H116941 222.28 4242 222.28 HALPRIN SUPPLY CO 395 VOID CK #4187 VENDOR # 01-4202-242 222.28- '395 VOID CK #4187 VENDOR # 01-4402-217 13,62- 395 VOID CK #4187 VENDOR # 01-4402-217 72.44- 395 VOID CK #4187 VENDOR 9 01-4402-217 68.70-4187 377.04 ATTI HARSCH i02 CONTRACT INSTRUCTOR-HArRSC 7-4108-224 109.20 4243 109.20 /D PET FOOC 3VOID CK #4074 OVERCHARGE 01-4404-210 825.00-4074 825.00- EAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 395 2 DATA SURVEYS 01-4106-234 ORM 78.30 P1885 78.30 L LA PRADE 302 PARKING LOT RENT -- MARCH 01-4301-254 3/81 500.00 4244 :500.00 ON LOVGREN 396 REIh18 HAZARD MATER SCHOOL01-4201-236 35.00 P1873 35.00 AWRENCE- R MC PHERSON 396 MILEAGE 1 /1-1/31 1-4401-203 STMT 81 .00 P1872 81 .00 395 LAWFO-CONFEREpCEQSOtJ 1-4401-206 022381 22.98 P1882 22.98 AID-STATE BANK 502 BUS LOAN 42-2-00-064121 5-44Q1-224 /81 1107 .32 -25- ATASCADERO PAGE NO. 4 DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 81-083 DATE 02/27 4§ Q PAYEE WARRANT CHECK N LICHER DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTEN DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTCHG'D INV.NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT 02 BUS LOAN 42-2-00-064394 05-4401-224 3/81 350 .97 4245 1458.29 -* ID-STATE BANK 95 FEDERAL 'NITHHOLDING 1-2160-001 022581 6417.59 P1880 6417,59 * HIRLEY L MOORS 96 REIMB PLNG CONF EXP 2/11-01-4110-246 86.06 P1871. 86.06 * SIC CARTHY TANK. & STEEL CO 02 ALUMINUM EXTEN LADDER 1-4405-221 185759 99,38 4246 99,38 * OLFE D NELSON 95 REIMS MILEAGE LOMPOC 1/3001-4101-206 30.00 P1881 30.00 * 'IATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASS 95 1 " 1981 .LIFE SAFETY CODE"01-4202-209 01HBPR 15,00 P1884 150 * lAYNE OLSON & ASSOC 02 FREIGHT ON SWING SEATS 1-4404-204 1749 3,93 4247 '3.93 * PACJF'!C TELI`PNoNE 02" 20-154-8220-333-N PHONE 1-4202-228 021181 13.50 02 220-154-4963-554-N PHONE 1-4202-228 021181 13.50 02 220-154-5659-300-N PHONE 1-4202-228 021181 13,50 4248 40.50 ACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 95 VOID CK a4083 OVERPAYMENT 1-4402-227 3705.72- 95 VOID CK #4083 OVERPAYMENT 1-4404-227 55.26-4083 1760,98. * UBLIC EMPLOYEE°S RETIRE SYS 96 RETIREMENT CONTRIS 1-2160-006 012381 8932.23 P1869 8932,23 ED STAR IND SERV 02 JACKETS 1-4402-205 439221 88,84 -26- ATASCADERO PAGE NO. 5 DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 81-083 DATE 02/27/81 PAYEE ]UCHER WARRANT CHECK N0. DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED > WRITTEN DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTCHG'D INV.NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT 503 UNIFORMS 01-4402-205 879714 16,83 503 UNIFORMS 01-4402-205 649454 16.83 503 UNIFORMS 01-4402-205 533233 16. 33 303 UNIFORMS 01-4402-205 765146 16.83 41Z 302 JACKETS 01-4404-205 439221 44.42 503 UNIFORMS 01-4404-205 879714 12.62 1 303 UNIFORMS 1-4404-205 649454 12.62 303 UNIFORMS 1-4404-205 533233 12.62 503 UNIFORMS 01-4404-205 765146 12.62 .302 JACKETS 01-4405-205 543922 22. 19 303 JACKET 01-4405-205 268747 22.21 503 UNIFORMS 01-4405-205 579714 8,80 303 UNIFORMS 01-4405-205 649454 8.80 303 UNIFORMS 01-4405-205 533233 8.80 303 UNIFORMS 01-4405-205 76SI46 8.80 303 DUST MOPS & TONELS 01-4405-211 765145 20,30 303 DUST MOPS & TOWELS 1-4405-211 533232 20.30 4249 371 .2 *I AWRENCE L STEVENS 39 REIMS PL14G CONF EXP 2/11-01-4110-206 150.00 39 REIMS PLNG COME EXP 2/11-01-4110-246 207.72 P1870 357.72 .ESTERN. OFFICE PRODUCTS INC iO4 VICTOR CALCULATOR 01-4102-305 18591 95.40 4250 95,40 URRAY L WARDEN ;04 CAR ALLOWANCE MARCH 01-4102-201 3/81 150.00 4251 150.00 :URRAY L WARDEN 1195 LOCC (MANAGERS CONE 2/18-201-4102*203 66.00 '-95 LOCC MANAGERS CONF 2/18-201-4102-206 236.42 P1883 302,42 A.LSH SECURITY LOCK SHOP 104 LOCKSET 01-4202-216 6870 227 .32 4252 227 ,32 IL-MAR DISPOSAL CO INC 04 GARBAGE_ SERVICE 01-4404-231 2181 142.00 -27- _Ar ATASCADERO PAGE NO. 6 DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 61-083 DATE 02/27 PAYEE WARRANT CHECK JCHER WRITTEN NO. DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTCHG'D INV.NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT 04 GARBAGE SERVICE 01-4405-231 2/81 40,50 4253 182,50 ATIENCE J NEST 96 REIMBURSE MILEAGE 9/9-2%301-4401-203 33.78 P1874 � 33.78 ELLERBACH PAPER SERV 04 SEMI-BLEACHED ROLL TONELSOI-4404-211 140976 352,98 4254 352.98 COLONY CONSTRUCTION 01 REF OVERCHG-COLONY CONST 1-3600-030 65,38 4255 65.38 HIPSEY & SEITZ 04 REFUND PERFORM BOND SHIPSOI-3500-090 5455 150.00 4256 150.00 99 NET PAYROLL 02/11/81 3984 3984-- 4050 29, 975, 77 4050 29,975. 77 99 NET PAYROLL 02/25/81 4101- 4101- 4166 101 4166 29 ,728 . 67 416 29 ,728 . 67 -28- r • • ATASCADERO PAGE NO. 7 ,DEMAND/WARRANT REGISTER NO. 81-083 DATE 02/27/81 PAYEE WARRANT CHECK IUCHER DETAIL OF DEMANDS PRESENTED WRITTEN N0. DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTCHG'D INV.NO. AMOUNT NO. AMOUNT vRITTEN 14551 .03 REPAID 72332 . 30 ACCRUED .00 TOTAL 86883.33; RECAP BY FUND RE-PAID WRITTEN FUND 01 72332. 30 9560.95 FUND 05 .00 4880.88 FUND 07 .00 109.20 -29 M E M O R A N D U M — — — — — — — — TO: CITY MANAGER March 3 , 1981 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP AT79-031 LOCATION: 7405 Balboa Road (Lot 11, Block 25) APPLICANT: David M. Renton -(Twin Cities Engineering) REQUEST: To allow a time extension to complete requirements set forth in the approval of the above referenced tentative parcel map. On March 2 , 1981 the Planning Commission considered this matter and granted a one year time extension ,to May ll, 1982 subject to the Staff recommendation including Items 1-6 with the addition of #7 to read as follows: "7. Standard City requirements and notes regarding private sewage disposal systems and percolation tests can be applied. " There was only limited discussion by the Commission with the con- sensus being that considerable progress had been made with the delays resulting from the need to extend the water line. Steve Youngken, representing the applicant, appeared and agreed with the recommendation. No one else appeared on the matter. LAWRENCE SVEVENS M R . Y W DEN Planning Urector City Man qer /Ps CITY OF ATASCADERO sallr ;,�(�,�� Planning Department March 2, 1981 1918 Ir f 1979 STAFF REPORT i SUBJECT: Tentative Parcel Map AT79-031 LOCATION:, 7405 Balboa Road (Lot 11, Block 25) APPLICANT: David M. Renton .(Twin Cities Engineering) REQUEST: To allow a time extension to complete requirements set forth in the approval of the above referenced tentative parcel map. BACKGROUND 1. Existing Zoning: A-1-B-V-3-D 2. General Plan: Suburban Single-Family Residential. 3. Project Description: The approved Tentative Map allows divi- sion of 10. 13 acres into two parcels of 4.516 and 5. 616 acres each. Access to the site is provided via Balboa Road and a i 25 foot wide private access easement which serves Parcel B. A condition of approval of the tentative map required that water operable facilities exist prior to filing of the Final Map. The applicant would like to extend water facilities along with the developmentofadjacent properties . The tentative map for this project was conditionally approved by City Council on May 12, 1980. No previous time extensions have been requested. STAFF COMMENTS On Tuesday, February 10 , 1981 the Subdivision Review Board met with Steve Youngken from Twin Cities Engineering, agent for the applicant, to discuss the requested time extension. Also attending that meet- ing were: Larry Stevens, Planning Director; Mary E. Beatie, Associ- ate Planner; John Kennaly, Assistant Civil Engineer; and James Wentzel, Planning Commissioner. The following areas of concern were discussed: a. Consideration was given to clarifying- a requirement for placement of a fire hydrant to serve both Lots 11 and Lot 10 of AT801230 : 1. b. It was also discussed that extension of water line could be coordinated with Tentative Map AT801230 : 1 for Lot 10. Page Two Re: Tentative Parcel Map AT79-031 March 2, 1981 1 c. Conditions established by the County Environmental Coordin- ator for the Conditional Negative Declaration shall be complied with in a manner satisfactory_to appropriate city agencies. Due to the fact this is a time extension request, no new conditions can be placed on the project. at this time. The comments above serve only to clarify or reiterate conditions placed previously by the County. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Department recommends approval of the time extension request subject to the following: 1. That all conditions of approval established by the County of San Luis Obispo shall remain in effect. 2. No sewage disposal system installations are to be placed closer than 100 feet (1001 ) from the top of the existing • creek bank, drainage swales, or areas subject to inundation. A note so stating shall appear on the Final Map. 3. Applicant to install one fire hydrant in a location and manner acceptable to the Fire Department generally at a point common to Lots 10 and 11 of Block 25 with their intersection with Balboa Road. Fire hydrant to be installed prior to recordation of Final Map. 4. Effort shall be made to minimize grading that would be disruptive to the natural topography and removal cf existing, mature trees. The following shall appear as a note on the Final Map: "No trees shall be removed without compliance with applicable City ordinances. No grading shall commence without an appro- priate permit and compliance with applicable City ordinances. " 5. A Final Parcel Map in compliance with all conditions set forth herein shall be submitted for review and approval in accordance with the Subdivision Map act and the City Lot Division Ordi- nance prior to recordation. a. Monuments shall be set at all new property, corners created and a Registered Civil Engineer or licensed land surveyor shall submit a letter certifying thatthemonuments have been set prior to recordation of the Final Parcel leap. Page Three Re: Tentative Parcel Map AT79-031 March 2, 1981 b. A Final title policy (CTLA or ATLA) shall be submitted for review in conjunction with the processing of the Final Parcel Map. 6. Approval of this time extension shall expire at 5: 00 P.M. on May 11, 1982. ACTION The Planning Commission should by motion direct Staff as deemed appropriate. TO APPROVE: Motion to adopt recommendation of Staff and set conditions. TO DENY: Motion setting findings for denial. REPORT PREPARED BY: MARY E. EATIE Associ e Planner REPORT APPROVED BY: LAWRENC STEVENS Planni Director /Ps ® 805/434.1834 TWIN CITIES ENGINEERING CIVIL ENGINEERING & SURVEYING ALLEN W. CAMPBELL RCE 20244 Januar 7 19 Y � 81 Mary E. Beatie Associate Planner City of Atascadero P. 0. Box 747 Atascadero, CA 93423 Subject : Time Extension for Parcel Pap AT 79-031 (Renton) Dear Mary • The subject tentative map expires on May 12 , 1980 . We are requesting a one year time extension which is permitted under the Subdivision Map Act , to allow the applicant time to extend the water facilities , which is required prior to filing the final map. The City has recently approved tentative lot splits to the east and west of the subject property. The applicant would like to extend his facilities along with the develop- ment of the adjacent properties . The estimated time of construction of said facilities is mid-summer. We would appreciate your favorable response to this request. Sincerely, (�A�V�. 0��Qm Stephen H. Youngken Project Leader SHY/ss enc. P . 0 , BOX 855 200 MAIN ST , TEMPLETON , CA . 93465 r 1 r e o z co D — t G N ° i r I' + 100 31 S „} 2 a T n r "' .JJi • IIA 0 ti VY ,V n ho L, \ a \ LP, Vn to CP o ° - C y ® rn 34 22 s -21 - 23 • 662 _ ►-B- D�So �g 24 1317 ✓ ' 3 ' 1 G 25 425 ` 16 Co 76-133 ' t5 i 3 27 i29 \ ,h< _ 14 M 30 2 _ 13 14 328. •, 15 A - g f 31 17 16 c 23 4 r ' 10 25 i� 19 213 21 J -9 - Zt�1�tl tiCa Yl Gt l-7-Y 30 (VAP V 30 AT 71!� 31 w � w w V o .r Z _ h a s N W 2 V � p W a 44 O �1oEE O to s---- -------------- \ N 8 S3�3d'11G E O1/dd• b a ` .. O U n (A • O O D iav3 cs k O� _AA s�e3p w O o ao SITE (,OC:ATtOtJ MAP a , AST 79-o31 p l � N \ f . oBa oZZi 00 r f/ 4�a �� i ' 00H a Aq O r �V gyp►�/ a ,Q`` go^Za > toTx� o=oo fo o. � O Al r• � A n 0 O o G�-r p< m _ ' D >(Ai �2`��- • M E M O R A N D U M TO: CITY MANAGER March 3 1981 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT LA801203 :1 LOCATION: 2825 Monterey Road (Lot 39 & ptn. Lot 40 of Block 6) APPLICANT: Leo and Mary Tidwell/Floyd Wood (Associated Professions) REQUEST: To adjust the property line between Lot 39 , a 2 .02 acre lot and a portion of Lot 40, a 1 .68 acre lot to resolve various encroachments. On March 2, 1981 the Planning Commission considered this matter unanimously adopting Findings 1-2 and approving the adjustment subject to Conditions 1-4 as listed in the attached Staff report. There was only brief discussion by the Commission with the consensus being that the adjustment would resolve existing encroachment prob- lems and would conform to zoning regulations. Leo Tidwell, the applicant, appeared giving a brief history of the situation and indicating his agreement with the recommendation. No one else appeared on the matter. lal� LAWRENCE EVENS RWARDEN Planning Virector it Manager • /Ps CITY OF ATASCADERO q r ,, �� ��.«.,�, � Planning Department .March 2, 1981 1913 C r, 1979 l STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: Lot Line Adjustment LA801203 :1 LOCATION: 2825 Monterey Road (Lot 39 and ptn. Lot 40 of Block 6) APPLICANT: Leo and Mary Tidwell/Floyd Wood (Associated Professions) REQUEST: To adjust the property line between Lot 39 , a 2 . 02 acre lot and a portion of Lot 40 , a 1. 68 acre lot to resolve various encroachments. BACKGROUND 1. Existing Zoning: A-1-23,-. 2. General Plan: Suburban Single Family Residential. 3. Environmental Determination: The Planning Director has deter- mined the project to be a Class 5 (a) Categorical Exemption according to the provisions of Section 15103 of CEQA. 4. Site Conditions : Lot 39 is presently undeveloped and is vegetated primarily with natural grasses . The portion of Lot 40 is developed with a single family dwelling and an accessory barn and garage. A white fence located northerly of the exist- ing dwelling was constructed by the owner of Lot 40 and built entirely on Lot 39. Also, an addition was built onto the house which extends to within one foot of the property line common with Lot 39 . Other encroachments involving a concrete slab patio and a shade tree also occur. 5. Project Description: The 'applicants are proposing to resolve the encroachments by adjusting the line common to Lots 39 and 40 to correspond with the new alignment of the existing white fence. This amounts to a reduction of Lot 39of 0 . 2 acres and similarly an addition of 0 . 2 acres to the portion of Lot 40 . STAFF COMMENTS On Tuesday, February 10 , 1981 the Subdivision Review Board met with the applicants (Leo and Mary Tidwell) to discuss this application. Also attending that meeting were: Larry Stevens , Planning Director; P?ary E. Beatie, Associate Planner; John Kenally, Assistant Civil • Engineer; and Jim Wentzel, Planning Commissioner. _, Page Two Staff Report: Lot Line Adjustment LA801203:1 (Tidwell) March 2 , 1981 The following items of concern were discussed at that meeting 1. How does the existing white fence relate to the current and proposed lot lines? 2. Two survey markers near road, is one the property corner, the other marks beginning of curve? 3. General Plan lot size consistency finding is not required for lot line adjustment. 4. Application is exempt from requirements of CEQA. 5.. Require monuments set at new property corners. It was indicated that the monuments alreadv exist. : 6. If applicant is willing, submit map in Final Map format for recording purposes. • FINDINGS 1. The application as presented has been determined to be Cate- gorically Exempt from the requirements of CEQA as defined by Class 5 (a) . 2. The application as presented conforms with the applicable zoning regulations. RECOMMENDATION, Based on the above findings , the Planning Department recommends approval subject to the following: 1. The approval of this lot line adjustment as shown on the attachment provided herein shall be submitted in a Final Mazy format to be approved by the Planning Department prior to recordation by the County Recorder' s Office. 2. Monuments shall be set at all new property corners created by this lot line adjustment and a registered engineer shall sub- mit a letter to the Planning Department certifying that the monuments have been set prior to recording of the Final Map and Certificate of Compliance. Page Three Staff Report: Lot Line Adjustment, LA801203:1 (Tidwell) March 2, 1981 3. Any tree removal or site grading necessary for the development of the lots shall be subject to Planning Department approval prior to issuance of a building permit. This requirement shall appear as a note on the Final Map. 4. Approval of this Lot Line Adjustment shall expire one year from the date of final approval unless a time extension has been granted pursuant to a written request prior to the ex- piration date. ACTION The Planning Commission should by motion direct Staff as deemed appropriate. TO APPROVE: Motion to adopt findings and set conditions. TO DENY: Motion setting findings for denial. • REPORT PREPARED BY; MARY E. BEATIE Associa e Planner REPORT APPROVED BY: LAWRE STEVENS Plann g Director /ps i 19 -PAS 3 v PAR ► \ \� 3 SPA 3 \ \ PAR 4 PARCEL o_ 4 \\ '` 23 23-AEL 2 _ _P_ARC 1�Cf 24 . �2 26 25 27 28 35 _ 34 36 ,� , 33 '3 37 32 30 - 8 38 1 31 39 7 23 //Co 76-2 I / 5 12-A / fA�.A // 4 41 / 15 /r3 3 4 2 �4 v Lo -7:5 82 ' 14 33-A 2 43 33 ZoN 1r O i V161 N ITy -E I{ 4 W C N � 'n Cn w '�♦ O niO�2 �'r. � �1 Pa `% .' n W N W I 92 W to C') 1 r , n 0 0 \\ W N Mk c,�. I cmn o m O .N °° 0 rri r > y8ya 2v � fl-N\ t 3r N ^ f� �,�V��! t� .r orf-,.''f_e .! � _� ; 3 4 I� .l-, _ �`� '• , y t Y • r r;� D 7-77 - .. QN- Y I ...i� t#^C34.wRitihcswX�,r�^:.n.w.r....+._�r.,.tFsi�.iG.x.`•s+.a.t�:+►•='..r.5..: --YY I� r t ` : M E M O R A N D U M : TO: CITY MANAGER March 3, 1981 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT:U JECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP AT810107 :1 LOCATION: 9100 and 9150 E1 Camino Real (Ptn. Lot 6, Block 10) APPLICANT: Henry Huong and Don Messer (Hilliard) REQUEST: To allow division of 0 .964 acres into two parcels of 0.478 and 0 . 486 acres each. On March 2, 1981 the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing adopting Findings 1-2, authorizing a Negative Declaration and ap- proving the Tentative Parcel Map subject to Conditions 1-8 as listed in the attached Staff report. There was only brief discussion by the Planning Commission on the matter with the consensus being that the proposed land division complied with zoning- regulation's and with the General Plan. Don Messer, the applicant, spoke on the matter giving a brief history and indicated his agreement with the recommendation. No one else appeared on the matter. LAWRENCE EVENS RRAY ARDEN CDjrector Planning ikianager /Ps CITY OF ATASCADERO C �� � ��«.� Planning Department March 2 , 1981 191,3 j, C C ` 1978 ®� STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: Tentative Parcel Map AT810107 : 1 LOCATION: ' 9100 and 9150 El Camino Real (Ptn Lot 6 Block 10) APPLICANT: Henry Huong and. Don Messer (Hilliard) REQUEST: To allow division of 0 .964 acres into two parcels of 0 .478 and 0 .486 acres each BACKGROUND 1. Existing Zoning: M-1-D (518) 2 . General Plan: Industrial Park 3 . Environmental Determination: An initial study environmental description form has been completed for the project. The Planning Director has prepared a Draft Negative Declaration for the project indicating that no significant adverse environ- . mental effects are likely to occur if the project is implemented as proposed. 4 . Site Conditions: The subject property is currently undeveloped and is generally level to slightly sloping. Most of the natural vegetation has been removed and there are only several small oak trees that remain. The site is bounded on the west by Highway 101, on the east by El Camino Real, on the north by mixed commercial/eight industrial uses and on the south by a single-family dwelling and vacant property approved for develop- ment with a mini-storage facility under Departmental Review R800421: 2. 5. Project Description: The applicant proposes the Tentative Parcel Map to include the two subject parcels which were pre- viously created after 1960 by Grant Deed only and without benefit of a Parcel Map as was required by law at that time. Access to each parcel is proposed to be from El Camino Real by individual driveways. STAFF COMMENTS On Tuesday, February 10, 1981, the Subdivision Review Board met with one of the applicants, Mr. Messer, to discuss the application. Also in attendance at that meeting were Larry Stevens, Mary Beatie, John Kennaly and James Wentzel. Page Two Res Tentative Parcel Map AT810107 :1 (Huong/Messer) March 2 , 1981 • Discussed at that meeting were the following items of concern: 1. Require full frontage improvements along E1 Camino Real . 2. Fire Department will require a fire hydrant to be installed to their specifications as part of road frontage improvements. 3. Separate sewer laterals may be allowed to be installed in a common trench in accordance with provisions of the Uniform Plumbing Code and County Sanitation District. It should be pointed out that a Departmental Review approval to construct a mini-storage facility (R800617:1) has already been obtained for the proposed Parcel B. Staff was unaware of the illegal lot problem until an application for a Departmental Review and a request for a zoning interpretation was received for the proposed Parcel A. The two applicants have jointly filed for this Parcel Map in an effort to correct a past illegal lot division and facilitate continuance with their respective projects. ANALYSIS As was pointed out in a previous matter concerning lots which were • created illegally, it is difficult to review applications which attempt to correct past illegal actions . Approval of such applica- tions could be construed as condoning those past illegal actions and thereby implicitly encouraging future actions seeking to avoid current standards. With this particular application, compliance with minimum lot size is not a problem since the General Plan does not specify a minimum lot size for land designated as Industrial Park. FINDINGS 1. The application as presented will not have a significant effect upon the environment and the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report is not necessary. 2. Approval of this application as recommended would conform to the applicable zoning regulations and is consistent with the 1980 Atascadero General Plan. RECOMMENDATION Based upon the above findings, the Planning Department recommends: A. Issuance of a Negative Declaration; and , • B. Approval of Tentative Parcel Map AT810107 : 1 subject to the following conditions: Page Three Re: Tentative Parcel Map AT810107 :1 (Huong/Messer) March 2 , 1981 • 1. Sewage disposal and water service shall be by connection to the City sewer and water. Operable facilities shall exist at the property frontage prior to filing of the Final Map, 2.. E1 Camino Real, along the entire property frontage shall be improved to full City standards prior to recordation of the Final Map or the applicant shall enter into an agreement with the Public Works Department to guarantee installation of frontage improvements within one year of the date of recordation of the Final Map. A performance bond, certificate of deposit, or similar arrangement shall be made in conjunction therewith. a. Street improvement drawings prepared by a registered civil engineer shall be 'submitted to the Public Works Department for review and approval prior to recordation of the Final Map. b. The applicants shall enter into an inspection agree- ment with the City for inspection of said improvements. 3. Effort shall be made to minimize grading that would be dis- ruptive to the natural topography and removal of existing, • mature trees The following shall appear as a note on the Final Map: - "No trees shall be removed without compliance with applicable City ordinances. No grading shall commence without an appropriate permit and compliance with applicable City ordinances. 4 . That a fire hydrant, of a type and size specified by the City Fire Department, be generally located at the property line common to Parcels A and B.' Exact location and manner of placement shall be subject to the approval of the Fire Department. A letter from the Fire Department certifying installation of the hydrant shall be received by the Planning Department prior to the recordation of the Final Map. 5. All utilities shall be placed underground. 6 . Final grading and drainage plans, prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer, shall be submitted to the Public Works and Planning Departments prior to issuance of building permits. 7. A Final Parcel Map in compliance with all conditions set forth herein shall be submitted for review and approval in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City Lot Division Ordinance prior to recordation. Page Four Re: Tentative Parcel Map AT810107 :1 (Huong/Messer) • March 2, 1981 a. Monuments shall be set at all new property corners created and a registered civil engineer or licensed land surveyor shall submit a letter certifying that the monuments have been set prior to recordation. b. A Final title policy (CTLA or ATLA) shall be submitted for review in conjunction with the processing of the Final Map. 8 . Approval of this Tentative Parcel Map shall expire one year from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted pursuant to a written request prior to the expiration date. ACTION The Planning Commission should by motion direct Staff as deemed appropriate. TO APPROVE: Motion to adopt findings and set conditions . TO DENY: Motion setting findings for denial. • REPORT PREPARED BY: Ak,-� MARY E., BEATIE Associ e Planner REPORT APPROVED BY: AWREN STEVENS Planni g Director XYZ 4 Ir <<;Z, � L i-Csu. 1a ` B pe PrYc i 39 J,ro�^`O� 't� 5pVw�j�-' D1 r•y`�/yP'' U� ,NA - A K, A8 (0 ,q Ct i .oyy° �• B9 \ 2q 3 4 ter,,sus \ 4 R C ;' `\ P-4�Y � 34 V , . , �v.� ' , PL AVE cAll g \ z pO 5. . op 14 PAR. 105 '' �c�a t7AFt 2 ♦ �¢ �' � '7 (� P-385 r Z 3 I 4 \ ! A \ ! .%/60/0 31 fAC P 439 P-1 =;ia- f ZoN t rJG -� VICINITY 6-A MA Zf -323 ;, co 75-30 �� ► �►-TO 10107: j O � h a O ` ------------- — ----- -- — ------ O • €OLE " O oO 4i z LL �► W � � D Q to Uco osi x/'96/ QN S S Q N � LL N N N r U ?t7 M Q Q Z QIN a C" P V S J m `` U M T � ro cp d V N w,o2oL S w a�•sz� �3 � �h. < rr ti O QIP aZ h ,n SIN to i O •a� O0 -� SITE LCYCATIOW 0 v u ATO 10101: x r; i tj ,.,psz � w . J%k 4 fit air _ ` ".. �'� bp,.. ,•� 0 � .V o •�Z gyp. :%. � � r s �„•` �°� '-'� We z w < J . �g �' �' �--'— r"�ate• ?G TA MAP ATg1 Dl o7 i ME M O R A N D U- M I : TO: CITY MANAGER March 3 , 1981 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP AT801230 :1 LOCATION: 7305 Balboa Road (Lot 10 , Block 25) APPLICANT: Gordon T. Davis Cattle Co. (Twin Cities Engineering) REQUEST: To allow division of approximately 11 acres into two parcels of 5 .6 acres each in an A-1-B-V-3-D zone. On March 2 , 1981 the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing unanimously adopting Findings 1-2, authorizing a Conditional Nega- tive Declaration and approving the Tentative Parcel Map subject to Conditions 1-13 as listed in the attached Staff Report. There was brief discussion among the Commission concerning the water line extension and the road improvement participation re- quirement. It was the consensus of the Commission that the proposed • land division was consistent with the General Plan and that the conditions recommended were appropriate. Steve Youngken, representing the applicant, inquired about the conditions relating to the fire hydrant (#8) , the offer of dedi- cation (#10) and the road improvement participation (#11) . He stated that the applicant objected in principle to providing a fire hydrant but that he would do so. There was no objection to the remaining conditions. No one else appeared on the matter. LAWYZENCE S VENS )PRAYWARDEN Planning rector it Manager • CITY OF ATASCADERO r. r c .. . 1918G � _�" 6! 1979 Planning Department March 2 , 1981 LADE STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: Tentative Parcel Map AT801230 :1 LOCATION: 7305 Balboa Road (Lot 10 , Block 25) APPLICANT: Gordon T. Davis "Cattle Co. (Twin Cities Engineering) REQUEST: To allow division of approximately 11 acres into two parcels of 5. 6 acres each in an A-1-B-V-3-D zone. BACKGRDUND 1. Existing Zoning: A-1-B-V-3-D. 2. General Plan: Suburban Single-Family Residential. 3. Environmental Determination: An initial study environmental description form has been completed for the project. The Planning Director has prepared a Draft Conditional Negative Declaration for the project indicating that no significant adverse environmental effects are likely to occur if certain mitigating measures are incorporated into the project. 4 . Site Conditions: The 11 acre site is currently undeveloped and is characterized by moderate to steep slopes. The site and surrounding area is heavily vegetated with oaks and natural grasses. The site is bounded by Balboa Road on the northeast, an approved Tentative Parcel Map (AT79-031 which created two parcels) to the northwest, and light agricultural/rural resi- dential to the southwest and southeast. 5. Project Description: The applicant is proposing to divide the 11 acre site into two parcels; Parcels A and B each being 5. 64 acres. No private access easements are indicated on the Ten- tative Map; therefore, access is assumed to be along each Parcels frontage on Balboa Road. STAFF COMMENTS On Tuesday, February 10 , 1981 the Subdivision Review Board met with Steve Youngken, the applicant' s representative and Project Manager of Twin Cities Engineering, to discuss the application. Also in attendance at this meeting were: Larry Stevens, Planning • Page Two Re: Tentative Parcel Map AT801230: 1 (Davis) March 2, 1981 Director; Mary E. Beatie, Associate Planner, John Kennaly, Assistant Civil Engineer; and James Wentzel, Planning Commissioner. The following is a list of concerns discussed at that meeting: 1. Access to Parcel A may be difficult from Balboa Road. Con- sideration was given to 'a common driveway to serve both Parcels A and B. Submit plans and profiles of driveway(s) to determine improvement requirements. 2. Water is presently not available. Suggest coordinating with AT79-031 (RENTON) . 3. Consideration was given to requiring participation in future improvement of Balboa. An additional five foot offer of dedi- cation is necessary. The level and manner of participation in conjunction with the City' s capital improvement project on Balboa will be resolved with the Public Works Department. 4. Percolation tests will be required due to soils having severe . septic limitations according to Soils Conservation Survey Maps. 5. The area is deficient in terms of adequate fire protection. A fire hydrant will be required generally at a point common to Lot 10 (this application) and Lot 11 (AT79-031) in Balboa Road. 6. Fire retardant roofing material shall be required at the time of building permit. 7. Recommend Negative Declaration. FINDINGS 1. The project as presented will not have a significant adverse effect upon the environment and the preparation of an Environ- mental Impact Report is not necessary. 2. The application as presented conforms to the applicable zoning regulations and is consistent with the 1980 Atascadero General Plan. i Page Three Re: Tentative Parcel Map AT801230: 1 (Davis) March 2 , 1981 RECOMMENDATION Based upon these findings, the Planning department recommends as follows : A) Issuance of a Conditional Negative Declaration as follows : 1. That provision be made for adequate access including pro- vision for improvements and slope protection. 2. That provision be made, through appropriate soils tests, to assure septic suitability on each lot. 3. That provision be made to reduce fire hazard at the site; and, B) Approval of Tentative Parcel Map AT801230 :1 subject to the following conditions: 1. Private sewage disposal systems will be an acceptable method of sewage disposal, if reports, tests, and design are acceptable. All tests, reports and designs shall conform to methods and guidelines prescribed by the Manual of Septic flank Practice and other applicable City ordinances. The following shall appear as a Note on the Final Map: "Appropriate soils reports including a percolation test, _ a test to determine the presence of ground water, and a log of a soil boring to a minimum depth of ten (10) feet shall be submitted to the Atascadero Planning Department prior to the issuance of a building permit on each lot. Where soils reports indicate that conventional soil ab- sorption systems are not acceptable, City approval of plans for an alternative private sewage disposal system, designed by a registered civil engineer, shall be required.. Depending upon the system, more restrictive requirements may be imposed. " 2. Water shall be obtained from the Atascadero Mutual Water Company and water operable facilities shall exist at the property frontage prior to filing of the final map. 3. The access easement to Parcels A and B shall be indicated on the Final Map 4 . Plan and profile drawings of proposed driveway(s) shall be submitted for approval by the Public Works and Planning Departments in order to determine average grade and appro- priate improvement requirements. If average slope exceeds 120, paved improvement would be a requirement at the time of application for building permit. Otherwise, an all weather surface would be required similarly. In the event ` Page Four Re: Tentative Parcel Map AT801230: 1 - (Davis) March 2, 1981 any portion of the driveway will be shared, improvement of that shared portion shall be a requirement made in conjunction with the first building permit. Notes to these effects shall appear on the Final Map. 5. With regard to improvement standards for the driveway, the following note .shall appear on the Final Map: "The private driveway shall be improved to a minimum width of twelve (12) feet with an unobstructed vertical clear- ance of fourteen (14) feet. " 6. Effort shall be made to minimize grading that would be disruptive to the natural topography and removal of ex- isting, mature trees. The following shall appear as a note on the Final Map: "No trees shall be removed without compliance with appli- cable City ordinances. No grading shall commence without an appropriate permit and compliance with applicable City ordinances. " • 7. All pipeline and other easements of record shall be shown on the Final Map. A letter shall be submitted from each utility company indicating the nature and extent of any building restrictions. A note so stating such restrictions shall appear on the Final Map. 8. The applicant shall install one fire hydrant generally in a location common to Lots 10 and 11 of Block 25 in Balboa Road, of a size and type and in a specific location and manner acceptable to the Fire Department. Said fire hy- drant shall be installed prior to recordation of the Final Map. 9. Roof materials for all structures shall be Class C rating or better and a Note to that effect shall appear on the Final Map. 10. That the applicant offer for dedication to the public for future road widening purposes five (5) feet along Balboa Road for the full width of Lot 10. Said offer to be shown on the Final Map and be made by certificate on the Final Map. • Page Five Re: Tentative Parcel Map AT801230: 1 (Davis) March 2, 1981 11. Prior to recordation of the Final Map, the applicant shall, in a form acceptable to the City, agree to pro- vide funds to assist in a City Capital Improvement Project to reconstruct Balboa Road. Said agreement shall be noted on the Final Map and/or otherwise re- corded with said agreement to remain in effect for a period not to exceed two years. Said funding partici- pation to be equivalent to one-half of a road width for the applicant' s frontage using the following formula: Applicant' s share = (project cost) X (0 . 5 X 492 . 8 ' ) Length of project in feet a. A bond, certificate of deposit, or similar based on engineer's estimate for the project, shall be pro- vided in conjunction herewith. 12 . A Final Parcel Map incompliance with all conditions set forth herein shall be submitted for review and approval in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City • Lot Division Ordinance prior to recordation. a. Monuments shall be set at all new property corners created and a registered civil engineer or licensed land surveyor shall submit a letter certifying that the monuments have been set prior to recordation. b. A final title policy (CTLA or ATLA) shall be submitted for review in conjunction with the processing of the Final Map 13. Approval of this Tentative Parcel Map shall expire one year from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted pursuant to a written request prior to the expiration date. ACTION The Planning Commission should by motion direct Staff as deemed appropriate. TO APPROVE: Motion to adopt findings and set conditions. TO DENY: Motion setting findings for denial. REPORT PREPARED BY: MARY EATIE, Associate Planner • REPORT APPROVED BY: LA RENCE a TEVENS, Planning Director 22 21' 1 23 7 rt 66 _Y �g 24 13 51 ��✓ 17 u r. PAC •�' ��► 25 25 i ► ` t 'APS 16 Co 764316 „ PW, � 45 s 26' 14 30 , _- -s28' 14 12 15 t 4 31 �• r _ f 7 16 10, . 24 225 k o A A� 27 ? //� 19 -27A :. s 20 t . 29 21 3 o Zc>NINC- vl(,I rl lTV MAP �TB�►2.30 ' 1 M, ora �O th W V w o , E N V > W� O o r to -tea tv 14 co A X6"3•�3 k o R �0 CA � �' SITE bcCATic)J O 77s „ a I n � y owr n � I a ., � �_ l l� '/may '� /y • / I � " Ai I Al o a Z o ,�� o �� y �� a� Q � ^ak �� � �eT� '� �- CS~ o co p . ° o► i M E M O R A N D U M - TO: CITY MANAGER March 3 , 1981 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP AT801210 :1 LOCATION: 2200 San Fernando Road (Lot 24 of Block 47) APPLICANT: Allen Grimes/Don. Messer REQUEST: To allow division of 11.1 acres into three parcels of 5 .3 acres, 2. 8 acres, and 3 .0 acres each in the A-1-B-V-3-D zone. On March 2 , 1981 the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing adopting Findings 1-2 , authorizing a Conditional Negative Declara- tion and approving the Tentative Parcel Map subject to Conditions 1-16 as listed in the attached Staff Report. There was some discussion among the Commission concerning percola- tion test requirements, the method of well abandonment, the minimum lot size in the A-1-B-V-3 zone and the type of all-weather surfacing on San Fernando. It was the consensus of the Commission that the proposed land division was consistent with the General Plan and that the conditions recommended were appropriate. The applicant, Don Messer, spoke indicating his concurrence with the recommended conditions . No one else appeared on the matter. LAWRENCE ST ENSRAY ARDEN Planning D ctor ty anager CITY OF ATASCADERO n Qr ;� ­� Planning Department March 2 , 1981 1913G f'+ c, 1979 AD c0 STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: Tentative Parcel Map AT801210: 1 LOCATION:' 2200 San Fernando Road (Lot 24 of Block 47) APPLICANT: Allen Grimes/Dory Messer REQUEST: To allow division of 11. 1 acres into three parcels of 5. 3 acres, 2. 8 acres, and 3. 0 acres each in the A-1-B-V-3-D zone. BACKGROUND 1. Existing Zoning: A-'l-B-v-3-D. 2. General Plan: Suburban Single-Family Residential. 3. Environmental Determination: An initial study environmental description form has been completed for the project. The Planning Director has issued a Draft Conditional Negative Declaration for the project indicating that no significant adverse environmental effects are likely to occur if certain mitigating measures are incorporated into the project. 4. Site Conditions : The site is characterized by extreme variation in site topography. Slopes on the site range from gently slop- ing (10o and less) to steeply sloping (30% and more) . The property is traversed by two major drainage ways; one near San Fernando Road in the easterly portion of the site, and one at the back of the lot, running generally parallel to the west- erly property line. Access to the site is currently via an unimproved drive from San Fernando Road. At present, a well exists near the southerly corner of the property. 5. Project Description: The applicant is proposing to subdivide the subject 11. 1 acres into three parcels of 5 . 3, 2 . 8 , and 3. 0 acres each in an A-1-B-V-3-D zone. Access to the three parcels is proposed to be via a private driveway easement utilizing generally the existing drive. Modifications to the driveway location consist of abandonment of the loop into Parcel B and a new extension through Parcel A at the edge of Parcel B con- necting to the existing driveway section serving Parcel C. The width of the proposed private driveway easement is un- specified at this point in time. The existing well is proposed to be abandoned. 0 Page Two 10 Re: Tentative Parcel Map AT801210 : 1 (Grimes/Messer) March 2 , 1981 STAFF C014MENTS On Tuesday, February 10 , 1981 the Subdivision Review Board met with Mr. Messer to discuss this application. Also in attendance at that meeting were: Larry Stevens , Planning Director, Mary E. Beatie, Associate Planner; John Kennaly, Assistant Civil Engineer; and James Wentzel, Planning Comrrfissioner. The following is a list of concerns discussed at that meeting. 1) Recommend Conditional Negative Declaration addressing the following critical areas of concern: - fire hazard: require fire retardant roof coverings per Section 3203(e) of the Uniform Building Code - adequate access: driveway improvement and slope protection - drainage and erosion control plan With regard to access, it was discussed that a requirement would be made to restrict access to all three parcels from the private driveway. With regard to the drainage plan, the existing swales shall be shown on the Final Map and develop- ment (excepting the driveway) within 50 feet of the swale be prohibited. 2) Evidence of spring or other underground water source on Parcel C near creek; questionable septic suitability. 3) Minimum average lot size by zoning is three acres; zoning is A-1-B-V-3-D. There was some discussion that parcel lines could possibly be readjusted to parcels that satisfy the three acre average minimum. 4) Require plan and profile drawings of proposed driveway in order to determine average grade and appropriate improvement require- ments; acceptability of slope banks and adequacy of turning radii for use by emergency vehicles. 5) Existing pipe under turn in driveway may be inadequate. 6) Require abandonment of existing well per County Health Depart- ment standards. 7) The status of the apparent pipe vent located in Parcel B. 8) Require applicant to waive right to refuse to participate in • future assessment district to improve San Fernando Road. Page Three Re: Tentative Parcel Map AT801210 :1 (Grimes/Messer) 40 March 2 , 1981 9) Continue all weather improvement from adjacent property driveway to subject property driveway. FINDINGS 1. The application as presented will not have a significant effect upon the environment and the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report is not necessary. 2. The application as submitted conforms to the applicable zoning regulations and is consistent with the 1980 Atascadero General Plan. RECOMMENDATION Based on the above findings, the Planning Department recommends : A) Issuance of a Conditional Negative Declaration as follows : 1. That provision shall be made toreducefire hazard at the site. 2 Adequate provisions shall be made for drainage and erosion control and protection in conjunction with site development. 3. That provision be made for adequate access including pro- vision for improvements and slope protection; and, B) Approval of the Tentative Parcel Map AT801210 : 1 subject to the following conditions 1. Private sewage disposal systems will be an acceptable method of sewage disposal , if reports, tests , and design are acceptable. All tests, reports and designs shall conform to methods and guidelines prescribed by the Manual of Septic Tank Practice and other applicable City ordinances. The following shall appear as a Note on the Final Map: "Appropriate soils reports including a percolation test, a test to determine the presence of ground water, and a log of a soil boring to a minimum depth of ten (10) feet shall be submitted to the Atascadero Planning Department prior to the issuance of a building permit on each lot. Where soils reports indicate that conventional soil ab- sorption systems are not acceptable, City approval of plans for an alternative private sewage disposal system, Page Four Re: Tentative Parcel Map AT801210: 1 (Grimes/Messer) March 2 , 1981 designed by a registered civil engineer, shall be re- quired. Depending upon the system, more restrictive requirements may be imposed. " 2. Water shall be obtained from the Atascadero Mutual Water Company and water operable facilities shall exist at the property frontage prior to filing of the Final Map. 3. Proposed Parcels A,B, and C shall all obtain access via the proposed private driveway easement. Said driveway easement shall be indicated on the Final Map and shall be generally as shown on the Tentative Map. 4. Plan and profile drawings of proposed driveway (s) shall be submitted for approval by the Public Works and Planning Departments in order to determine average grade and appro- priate improvement requirements. If average slope exceeds 120 , paved improvement would be a requirement at the time of application for building permit. Otherwise, an all- weather surface would be required similarly. In the event q Y any portion of the driveway shall be shared, improvement of that shared portion shall be a requirement made in conjunction with the first building permit. Notes to these effects shall appear on the Final Map. 5. With regard to improvement standards for the driveway, the following note shall appear on the Final Map: "The private driveway shall be improved to a minimum width of twelve (12) feet with an unobstrcted vertical clear- ance of fourteen (14) feet. " 6. Effort shall be made to minimize grading that would be dis- ruptive to the natural topography and removal of existing, mature trees . The following shall appear as a note on the Final Map: "No trees shall be removed without compliance with appli- cable City ordinances. No grading shall commence without an appropriate permit and compliance with applicable City ordinances. " 7. Drainage swales to be shown on Final Map. 8. Drainage and erosion control plans, prepared by a regis- tered civil engineer, shall be submitted for review and approval by the Public Works Department prior to recorda- tion of the Final Map. Page Five Re: Tentative Parcel Map AT801210 :1 (Grimes/Messer) March 2, 1981 a. The existing drainage pipe shall be reviewed for adequacy and be upgraded as deemed necessary. b. Adequate erosion control shall be provided in the q vicinity of the existing pipe and slope protection provided as necessary for the existing driveway and easement. 9 . Prior to recordation of the Final Map, the applicants shall, in a form acceptable to the City, agree to parti- cipate in an assessment district or similar cooperative effort at an undetermined future date to provide road improvements in conformance with City standards on San Fernando Road. Said agreement shall be noted on the Final Map and said road improvements shall be provided within three years from the date of recordation of the Final Map. An extension of time to a longer time may be granted by the Planning Commission. Furthermore, said road improvement condition does not bind the City to accept, participate in, or fund any such effort. It shall be the responsibility of the applicants to take the initiative in compliance herewith. " 10. In conjunction with the issuance of a building permit on any of the lots, provision shall be made for adequate access from the nearest paved road. Adequate access shall include grading as deemed necessary in the 'road right-of-way to the closest point already so improved on San Fernando and on the site (s) and shall include all-weather surfacing with the design and materials subject to prior review and approval by the City Plan- ning and Public Works Departments. Maintenance of said adequate access shall be the responsibility of the property owners. 11. All parcels created shall have a minimum gross size of 3. 0 acres. 12. Provision shall be made and necessary permits obtained for abandonment of the existing well prior to record- ation of the Final Map. 13. All pipeline and other easements of record shall be shown on the Final Map. A letter shall be submitted from each utility company indicating the nature and extent of any building restrictions. A note so stating such restrictions shall appear on the Final Map, 14. Roof materials for all structures shall be Class C rating or better and a note to that effect shall appear on the Final Map. Page Six Re: Tentative Parcel Map AT801210: 1 (Grimes/Messer) March 2, 1981 15. A Final Parcel Map P in compliance with all conditions set forth herein shall be submitted for review and approval in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City Lot Division Ordinance prior to recordation. a. Monuments shall be set at all new property corners created and a registered civil engineer or licensed land surveyor shall submit a letter certifying that the monuments have been set prior to recordation. b. A Final title policy (CTLA or ATLA) shall be sub- mitted for review in conjunction with the processing of the Final Map. 16 . Approval of this Tentative Parcel Map shall expire one year from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted pursuant to a written request prior to the expiration date. ACTION The Planning Commission should by motion direct Staff as deemed appropriate. • TO APPROVE: Motion to adopt findings and set conditions. TO DENY: Motion setting findings for denial. REPORT PREPARED BY: MARY E. EATIE Associate Planner REPORT APPROVED BY: LAWRE C STEVENS Plann g Director 91i - l hJ-1 N171A 9IntN07 x - Lii 6 £1 , �I S ^ 1 . 9z _ 0 Z 5 I : LZ 4 91 6 rapt I-91 i A ' / Lt 0 a L. • _ ".mac.�.. �; . 9 81 - Cl 91 . . . r �Z' t 01 I ) Z A� r� d ava 1 :otZtogl�t � �, An (Yo tIVf 0"1 311S Q o p lyr SArN FERNAND i ROAD �- z Cy AZ h toN • i cl Q • ,. � � .._ .`-e r.. ... ';4a, .. .� T u.«''" ...'<'- . 3 r ,-'? L x 3 ,�!n.'a i$�n�..•n,ice. i..�x;<q. vI. -x ^4e-t as e ^•* ,*- n 1. . > ,i,-� . ---� A*-:,-- hl lw, k "� v Y `x� .1 — r o i w ` -3. '� k Z„ a L 't�" a-ny, ``, '"�d°a^4•+ a „y U. ' s> �r ^Is �...,I11 ,", x""+s�d h- ,k."'i r. ix '' �,x 3 # a. u. ,..y w r,. c "^. "t s �m tip '`i' �+��,'., I .r.. x •..y es + a Z .�, ,d _ a 's� : .+ x.x �,v r � +.k '� Y,t s.xz w + g,. +. yh'af1. i .r eft t� C n w'' t �' tx n# ,t..�,�.:« x.'a"n _� L y. ". -;rr, _ '�` + .+x .S,_. Yj f'y, h5�•1 r`fFV-'s'��"p& +�'+,a,MSAk.�ti,+ --'C c. i+. 5#Y ✓` »> +*§y.+ ;` + 'w.:wul atm-w�" ,n• 1 ...+ rry .y.. Yt ..-:: .rr•a�++•.._. _ °". 'Vf 3 R"fA' 4Ji' kc.•-11 ,rYs �f �.. .x.•. .xn. _ ' w wif!' w >.+Y.,.- ,sy-,v.� .mom'l a --r.+a. mem .*. _� - -'-�"`1-14� -� vw+,�r.�.s...sn,•�-w-rr r� _ �^ f 7 +xwa. r a 4j" �af" -� Sw, 'Yv.,{xs .r+ `xxrc-i» .v.,...r,.,. n+wwrMu— -1 tzVl r},;J,S'_kt11, ,3-}� .J` '+w �J s r 'r ', , ,,s. ,+. �. M- * r,r`s< �. t«+^ '.'t" — -,- a ewY, + '�... a i `Ytr ✓ jwW .>:<$Y^ +X.Y�a7'�F !t'�•� �('' y ^,n ,,,y a v s a7i^ '�' K ..*r .a r 1 4 y r c * t s ".�r� ar Y `, _ 29 P T a .ni�'� J k r �' t [ x d"'� '`�3..., .€ av '+•ro <x*P 'S, r S &I rtrc'h +sl t5 } ,,.n",+ b r '' x z.,s ;. t 4 ',�... ,C,r.., -r '`rtr ` ' S S:i' r f..: �a'^x`F"�m,� r�w 't�tii �a"�it' ) 1 11 � A N _ , 1 f 11 I, ll - °8,« .k n.4 M"w*�y+'«, ,t� 4 4� tin {y.. +-,-`;. N 11,I M1 ..' - .. K -.1- .. . _ v,.r__ _ a. M L-w v .. - 11 i I'll i Fa I a fir ,y.i � x wy t i 3 .0 % M J k ar 's.,b'wx�^^-( L ',�,',Z ro �,rN.e, �fe"• rrY Y '�Y� ,� ":ea'*� 7^'C"'S t y ±«' x.-��.�k r,f +'�4a f" x "'�� yd' 'w .,, w,.. - �� 't yr tyi.*�ll d. 1� '+S F - 11 11 �r ,F * +s. vi i s '' : e r t �. 1,ZF 4 Y'"J y{v } o 11 'r ' .\ J f W. _.✓ ,: 'F y v K t .k.; J a N .t , + x .�r Y;;"?" 'a2 F! .Sy0. ..1 ., w v a r i 1' -q'xl `S+1 +' t a4 w Y 11 y 4 s 7i z s t 'f + r s • ✓ ^�a'?v" }r �•,t,, a,,, �1.-v "r. s +: 3 _ a. a Lx'h}�{,c � ,v5t 'r+ 1< s';�iAr` „ r- a F, a a ,,5 .� to * s r +,F " 4;u'* >e y s t-.. 'L ., -+.> v ,i r J S s. K art u.'sem , ti 4 'i z ss, W ' fi s+��!' ,,,i�,F�"-5hd �! .F. dt b _h.r S 11'K iF dal -t`'•ra'+' #^'s1'Mrg r 3P '�,-- 11, ,.. ..i .vu i_ 21, '"�Gsl'-+4` a+4 '4 1 lN ' E 1' ;,,,'{ � k �_,. �f.+t,�",, r , , Fri111.1 'a moi' j'' - k•, 'C,a l+�+. ,� i 44 Et k , ' ,pct; r t Ity.h �."*'s•s- y,.., y, c+.,�.4,4, F sci � ", ,f,�C. t r,;, s t '^'i,' o k Y`f,; ~v F7"x r '�' 7 .r + { , , : !. x`� k Y M4 T k 3 1 h Y f <. h .+I t »' Ati:'r fry,J.✓'!M� s t J i �:5 vJ _,tiz 'Y >;� 4` «Y.. i 'j„ .r a� I - `4 '{fir //'1. � rggt r a- r .1 I tti _ / //,y y :e. ztinzs ..LQ,, .-.Yr'*ttC'M''9.v.e,7..:#d, 4:e,.''k, tikECli s"-Xg'✓ +,J"'E'+" ..- + R_ .-/r r*...re.,Ma.:. ..a� �:-..t ..rr. +w� ,..+....n.ur»'++ r , .. �.... ,,._— _._ ..,,..-..mJ ...,..Y.....,^e..�y.�+,.., f ,. y .•w.. Y- .t -a »�+ .,` . .., 4. <� ;F+rtel 7w" , , - I , Iltl,,,.��,, ' �,L�,.� -------; � �. ' - , , , ay,x,,�,,x '�--.s4 �-�'-1 it —N., �yr+ w„'� w.v +r e t rf :' .� `fIt- I or r: - ^'>aca .`., h;, ' , k" 1. q�'S"', ',.. a -,-„ly,y -'�z.3.4a +{�.r.F'.„��`.r �wi "I ,”, Yys .N'� S'+t E{ v21i r' / �.•..3.+: + V rk�vrrN ,. -,,t i..S nsk x dT` :�' vt„" .3'tfs.?d�i* .r t .4 }�**. �4' y � � 7" -c... Yukh. ..^,:. `'y,,` �-' }fpo 5�r 1„511 ix+'r-+L7., \A ,E r.S:tt �� 1 r F � r-1 �:u 4;n .,�— R 1 .ElitawY.• �l il ' - � , �l mrS'b�^ :,i,4,„�,,.mse{s�,. +..: „fi L /� ..:,,:;�T�e "-s ° a-.— •,....� -r(es�'_ , -,�..- , , ;.��-.,, I -�] ,�I., -1 ; -/. 4 v :., I I :1 ;.;� � f,� 4 tr,z- � I I '. �, , - , . "" "y"�."n"' ,`fy+s T., : x „�,Y' ,,� ^l/ .: Y '?iR"` "`ai""" t ,.� 1:1w. ,r.s.' '�t< - x- 1 J/ .AJ �// - . , . � m .V-7,11 I I�;ll 1 ro.a w,^ r i Lr ti v s {# # 1 I5�1/7// rr r F N r n. s`q�.....',,,i,�'"� a i K � + ! x , ' , : .,a," r ,� ,,. _.f.�.� 'tea. I lr� I �� - ..!,!n-4 �� -��.l M& ~ �{ , , - - :X res. 1(t .. " --'��, 1.n . ' 1 �l � i I �/ � I \� 1` ' I r> =-_ J `. �,,Z. ..,, '' ..,�, ,�, 11 ,, .� :, �-'­�,� �,-",� I" , -I I � . � : 6- - 'A , () /� 7 1`11-11 N �'-! t - y N M �, j 1 f, Cy{ CJ I-- 3i �'� �'"' 1 v„i *,.*rg x t .s- �.. •y' is {' "j y x ',r t '� "' � ,SS Y ,e:a� kms' �i �"i� Mme ./ - - Z ,'t+y $ n3iE5+ �" rd+ s r 1-1 t r? t f :'k s�yY. F iu _ ..n `e ,.xa.. .u. .@ n,,,w.-- ,.w..=,•,.---�"�*-.— ��ww-wwaa+r '[��.,FF -- 'a s f 4 r -y, '�'* :r rc t i .i 1,t x e: r f ,. 1 ,, �'F -rt4 t `' _ i .r 2 .3,:r t c y rs' ,lam + , S;2t ''• �*' rva'sF K ,. r_ - • • 9 M E M O R A N D U M ; - - - - - - - - - - - - TO: CITY MANAGER March 3 , 1981 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: VARIANCE V810202 :1 LOCATION: Behind 6010 Del Rio adjacent to Highway 101 (Portion Lot 4 , Block 48) APPLICANT: Atascadero Junior Women' s Club REQUEST: To allow a 96 sq. ft. community identification sign in excess of 20 sq. ft. maximum allowed in the A-1 zone. On March 2, 1981 the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing unanimously (Commissioner Sherer declared a conflict and did not participate) adopting the following Findings : 1. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances applicable to the proposed sign since community identification signs pro- vide a unique benefit to the community which should not be considered in the same context as typical signs. 2. The granting of this variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of the substantial rights of the owner and the applicant since no provision is currently made in the zoning ordinance for community identification signs . 3 . The granting of this variance will not adversely affect persons residing in the area and will not be materially detrimental to property or improvements in the area since community identifi- cation signs will, of necessity, be limited in number or no precedent can be established for other types of signs; and, approving the requested sign subject to the following conditions : 1. The sign shall be reduced to a maximum overall height of 15 ' from finished grade. 2 . Written permission by the property owner to erect the sign shall be submitted to the Planning Department prior to issu- ance of a building permit. 3. The sign use shall be limited to identification of the City as proposed and to plaques identifying various service organiza- tions located within the City and no commercial or similar use shall be made thereof. Memorandum: Variance V810202 :1 Page Two March 3 , 1981 4 . Approval of this Departmental Review shall expire one year from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted pursuant to a written request prior to the expi- ration date. 5. Provision shall be made to assure that the sign is properly maintained. In the event that the Planning Commission determines that the sign is not properly maintained, action may be taken to require the party responsible for said main- tenance and the property owner to remove the sign. There was some discussion among the Commission concerning the appropriateness of a variance and concerning the benefits associ- ated with community identification signs. It was the consensus of the Commission that the situation was unique, that the signs performed an important community service, and that, while a variance may not be technically correct, the primary deficiency was with the ordinance, not the request. Nancy Sherer, representing the Junior Women's Club, spoke in favor of the sign as proposed. She pointed, out that it was a unique situation, that the sign was for a community service, and that there was no time to wait for the zoning ordinance to be amended. Mrs. Sherer also questioned the need for written permission from the property owner. Grigger Jones, representing the Chamber of Commerce, indicated their support for the sign pointing out their sizable contribution and the need for a community identification sign, 4 LAWRENCE S VENS *RRARDENPlanning D ' ector ger CITY OF ATASCADERO ,/ ea�rr y ir. 191$ �, C ,F� �I 1 Planning Department March 2 , 1981 rr �c STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: Variance V810202 :1 LOCATION: Behind 6010 Del Rio adjacent to Highway 101 (Portion Lot 4 , Block 48). APPLICANT: Atascadero Junior Women' s Club REQUEST: To allow a 96 sq, ft. community identification sign in excess of 20 sq. ft, maximum allowed in the A-1 zone. BACKGROUND 1. Existing Zoning: A-1. 2 . General Plan: Suburban Single Family Residential 3 . Environmental Determination: The Planning Director has deter- mined the project to be a Class 11 (a) Categorical Exemption. 4 . Site Conditions The site has a gently rolling topography and is covered by trees and natural grasses. It is bordered on the northeast by Highway 101 and on all remaining sides by sparse, rural residential and agricultural . There are no buildings located in the vicinity of the proposed sign. 5 . Project Description: The applicant is proposing to erect a Community identification sign for the purpose of identifying the City and various service organizations to travelers along Highway 101. The sign is approximately 96 sq. ft. in area with an overall height of 221 . The sign is to be constructed of redwood with two wood poles as .supporting columns . The sign would depict the Administration Building and an oak tree with the words "Welcome to Atascadero. " Provision would be made for various community organizations to place their plaques on 1 ' X 12 ' cross members. STAFF COMMENTS Regulations in the A-1 Zone allow "one sign. . . .not to exceed twenty square feet. . . .to advertise the products produced or sold on the premises or for sale off the premises on which it is placed or to identify the premises or occupants . " Since the proposed sign ex- ceeds the permitted sign area and does not conform to the use limit- ation and since provision is not made elsewhere in the zoning Page Two Re: Variance V810202 :1 (Atas. Junior Women's Club) March 2, 1981 ordinance for community identification signs, a variance is being sought. It has been noted in conjunction with prior variance applications that a variance can only be granted to relieve a landowner from unique hardship because the land itself is different due to its size, shape, topography or location from other similarly zoned land in the area. It is difficult to justify this variance on those grounds since the subject property seems quite similar to surrounding A-1 zoned properties in terms of its physical charac- teristics. If granted in this case it would be difficult to deny similar requests for other 22 ' high, 96 sq. ft. signs in similar circumstances. It will undoubtedly be pointed out that the proposed sign is in- tended to provide a noteworthy and desirable service to the community. While there is no disagreement with that aim, it must nevertheless be pointed out that this "benefit" is irrelevant to the proper consideration of a variance. Rather, the proper approach is to modify the zoning text to make provision for such signs if they are so beneficial or is to find a more suitable .zoning clas- sification under which the sign can be more favorably considered. It also seems appropriate to point out that the scale of the sign in terms of its height and sign area is not in keeping with the rural residential/agricultural character of the immediate area. If the sign is favorably considered,_-a reduction in its mass appears essential. FINDINGS 1. There are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances appli- cable to the proposed sign or the subject property which do not also apply to other signs or land in the vicinity and in the A-1 Zone. 2 . The granting of this variance is not necessary for the preser- vation and enjoyment of the substantial property rights of the owner or the applicant; since adequate provision is made for signing for uses permitted in the zone. 3 . The granting of this variance may adversely affect persons residing in the area due to the bulk of the proposed sign and may be materially detrimental to property or improvements in the area by encouraging similar signing in the future. • Page Three Re: Variance V810202 :1 (Atas . Junior Women's Club) March 2, 1981 _ RECOMMENDATION Based upon the findings, the Planning Department recommends denial of Variance V810202 :1. The Planning Department further recommends that consideration be given to community identification signs in the upcoming Zoning Text Consistency hearings. ACTION TO APPROVE: Motion to set appropriate findings and establish conditions (if any) TO DENY: Adopt Staff recommendation. REPORT PREPARED BY/APPROVED -BY: LAWRENCE XTEVENS Planning Oirector /Ps 47 12 '• 23 % �y 8 32-E 33 2 4 25 \ \ Po o \25-A 32-D 33-A r V6001z1 ` 1 I �o �ti• c� 25-B P-L� 3:2'- C, 3 3-B In 27 32-B33-C_ 28 FAI�' 32-A 8 33-D-* �� � 29 32 7 \`\ _av �� 30 31-F 31-E 33-E 6 \ \ 31-0 5 \ 3 31-C 33-F :Fz 31-A �� 3 \ ! 31 Sv°Za L 3 3 Y' 3 o-F P-� 35- B �\ A1312 `C .. 10000 Go-7�-lam \ C \60' \ \\ \\ \ \ 1 2 G p.: 6.122 j 16 \ .�5 'PAit.B 17 �► _ m Z sc � Ofd CAI a W 'b Ali - _ v � - -- ' ;, Fes.► O CD tit 44. w zs=f I� Z 320! 70� a r .• yx �. N � { .:� � •may h O h CA M 44 J. c p - - s:' .- 33'1•� � f r �,,: � x••. z�' s `, '� �' — w , } � s •{=,371-' - � �Yj-} t � i - .. to - I ��� - } '_'� i... <-tq '•g.+t.- -z � —V .� 4 s•. .s ,n,r �-v� v'T r'�+i z_ ; ,.. .x �.i ,'�.� s ,4 �` T t 3 �• P� '�.:3r q A "'.}r- wN s f - 30iZ s of DEL z-�� r 11 Rl0 . v. ROA1 717, To be completed by the applicant Name: fl TRS«`!'` ^ JR, [-ti�J R• Site address: Legal description of property: Lot: ;Tei) Q)r ,Z Block: Tract: Assessor's Parcel Number: e,4,4-?lei WM O SOS ^� -� led 4t s _ l&d &CCATIoAJ 1 } 1 1 l +. 0 s /q10 M E M O RAN D U M : TO: CITY MANAGER March 3 , 1981 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW R810202 :1 LOCATION: Behind 10640 El Camino Real adjacent to Highway 101 (Portion Lot 7, Block 35) APPLICANT: Atascadero Junior Women's Club REQUEST: To allow a 96 sq. ft. community identification sign in excess of the 20 sq. ft. sign area and the build- ing height limitations in the R-4 Zone. On March 2 , 1981 the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing unanimously (Commissioner Sherer declared a conflict and did not participate) adopting Findings 1-3 and approving the requested sign subject to Conditions 1-4 as listed in the attached Staff Report with the addition of the following condition: "5 . Provision shall be made to assure that the sign is properly maintained. In the event that the Planning Commission determines that the sign is not properly maintained, action may be taken to require the party responsible for said maintenance and the property owner to remove the sign. " There was considerable discussion concerning the location of the sign, its design, and the sign height needed for adequate visi- bility. There was further discussion among the Commission concerning the existing sign with service organization plaques in the area and its poor condition.. The question of what con- stituted a service organization was ,briefly discussed. It was the consensus of the Commission that the sign did provide a desirable community benefit but that the conditions recommended, including the lowering of the sign height from 22 ' to 15 ' , were appropriate. Nancy Sherer, representing the Junior Women' s Club, spoke request- ing approval of the sign as proposed. She pointed out that the 22 ' height was necessary for the sign to be seen from the freeway and to prevent damage and vandalism to the sign. She stated that her organization had worked hard on the project and still hoped to turn the sign over to the City for maintenance even though Council had turned down the previous request. Ed Biaggini, property owner, spoke in favor of the sign indicating that he would allow the sign to remain when his property was developed in the future. Memorandum: Departmental Review R810202 :1 Page Two March 3 , 1981 Several other persons in the audience spoke in favor of the sign indicating its benefit to the Community. Concerns were expressed regarding the procedures necessary to obtain approval. �z/ LAWRENCE ST E NS RRA I^ARDEN Planning Di e for City Manager /Ps CITY OF ATASCADERO • Planning Department 1918 11979 CAD STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW 8810202 :1 LOCATION: Behind 10640 E1 Camino Real adjacent to Highway 101 (Ptn. Lot 7, Block 35) APPLICANT: Atascadero- Junior Women ' s Club REQUEST: To allow a 96 sq. ft. community identification sign in excess of the 20 sq. ft, sign area and the building height limitations in the R-4 Zone. BACKGROUND 1. Existing Zoning: R-4-B-2-D 2. General Plan: High Density Multiple Family Residential 3. Environmental Determination: The Planning Director has determined the project to be a Class II (a) Categorical Exemption. 4. Site Conditions : The site has gently rolling topography and is covered by natural grasses. It is bordered on the southwest by Highway 101 and on all remaining sides by mixed residential uses. There are no buildings located in the vicinity of the proposed sign. 5. Project Description: The applicant is proposing to erect a community identification sign for the purpose of identifying the City and various service organizations to travelers along High 101. The sign is approximately 96 sq. ft. in area with an overall height of 221 . The sign is to be constructed of redwood with two wood poles as supporting columns . The sign would depict the Administration Building and an oak tree with the words "Welcome to Atascadero. " Provision would be made for various community organizations to place their plaques on 11x 12 ' crossmembers. Page Two q •Departmental ReviewR810202 :1 (Atascadero Jun Women' s Club) March 2, 1981 STAFF COMMENTS In the R-4 zone signs are limited to a maximum area of 20 sq.ft. , not to exceed the building height unless a Departmental Review approval is secured. It would be the purpose of this review to evaluate the proposed sign in light of other signs and develop- ment in the area. The immediate vicinity of the proposed sign is sparsely developed with no nearby building although both the general plan and the zoning envision a more intense multiple residential development in the future. It should be pointed out that the proposed sign is at the extreme rear portion of the site and probably would not adversely affect such future development. The only existing signs along that Portion of Highway 101 are billboards which appear to be 15 '-18 ' in height and approximately 300 sq. ft. in area. Consideration should be given to reducing the scale of the sign in terms of its area and its height in order to make it more compatible with future residential development in the area and with general community standards governing signs. It should be pointed out that the proposed sign has been eval- uated as any other sign would be without regard for its stated prupose. This has been done since there is no formal recognition of or special treatment for community identification signs in the zoning ordinance. If the Commission deems this to be a deficiency such provisions could be considered in the upcoming Zoning Text Consistency Study. FINDINGS 1. The subject property is adequate in terms of size and shape to accomodate the recommended sign in a manner which is compatible with other uses and property in the vicinity. 2. The recommended signing will not have an adverse effect on abutting property or the permitted use thereof. 3. The establishment of the sign as recommended will not be detrimental to persons residing in the vicinity map, nor will it be injurious to other property and improvements in the area, nor will it impede the orderly development of the neighborhood or the character of the area. Page Three Departmental ReviO R810202 :1 (Atascadero Junta Women's Club) March 2 , 1981 • RECOMMENDATION Based upon the findings the Planning Department recommends ap- provalif Departmental Review R810202: 1 subject to the following conditions: 1. The sign shall be reduced to a maximum overall height of 15' from finished grade. 2 . Written permission by the property owner to erect the sign shall be submitted to the Planning Department prior to issu- ance of a building permit. 3. The sign use shall be limited to identification of the City as proposed and to plaques identifying various service organizations located within the City and no commercial or similar use shall be made thereof. 4. Approval of this Departmental Review shall expire one year fromthedate of final approval unless an extension of time is granted pursuant to a written request prior to the expiration date. ACTION TO APPROVE: Motion to set findings and conditions per Staff recommendation. TO DENY: Direct Staff as deemed appropriate REPORT PREPARED/APPROVED BY: LAWRENCE14TEVENS Planning irector S 7 V _ 4 7oT g06� AVL 10. 'n •V6�8� s s �< It /^ 425 r3-zZ22 •4 � _ • � `2*,off � < _ �:�• :• b aaaNNN 2+20 J��DSys, 000 77 b ` - +U640fY2b •--��{ -.F ti tJ410�0 $O , 1. + �-�. ".�"" � :`"mss.,� •�;'�- -� .'�, .� ,<`� �a�o�,\. ;�� It Iv 5 ' A ,, 4- t e... •.a.-I 12 14 17 ' 35ZoNi G VIUM 18 _, :. . r-.' - {'S .- }i'":.,, �d--. { �. 'S:�'c.t_�•. t' tis'•`��`.�. .�< �V��V V m, R A FA E LOBD sa i/Z R0-4 D o _ I 3 I D _ i w O � I � x.391 � v m b r I ~ Z O C I y b � w z o D Cat y � o � z I G�9 b _ N O tai (Wj� o Z O � .a w o �, tt C To be completed by the applicant: Name: !,�%AS_ .I,"' /,Ot,7 .S �l t.15 Site address Legal description of property:r�r Lot: 1 ;7 Block: �,P _�� Tract Assessor's Parcel Number: �Q P1lf 07 7 /w/V f A) STE PLAN r i4 8l DZOZ= 1 RESOLUTION NO. 5-81 RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF PARCEL NO. 2 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND V. M. COOK, ET AL, RELATING TO THE PURCHASE OF MALL PROPERTY WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Atascadero has approved an Agreement between the City and V. M. Cook, et al, relating to the purchase of Mall Property; and WHEREAS, the Council desires to authorize the purchase of Parcel No. 2 in accordance with the terms and provisions of the referenced Agreement for purchase of Real Property. NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Atascadero resolves as follows: Section. The appropriate officers of the City are hereby authorized and directed to do and perform any and all acts and things required, and to attest, execute and deliver any and all documents and instruments necessary or proper to carry out, perform and consummate the terms and provisions of the aforesaid agreement to purchase Parcel No. 2 on behalf of the City of Atascadero. On motion by Councilman and seconded by Councilman the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote: AYES : NOES: ABSENT: ADOPTED: ROBERT J. WILKINS, JR. , Mayor ATTEST: MURRAY L. WARDEN, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: w ALLEN GRIMES, City Attorney M E M O RAN D U M : TO: CITY MANAGER March 3 , 1981 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGE Z810105 :1 LOCATION: 8250-8400 Morro Road (Lots 1,2 ,3 ,4 ,17, and 18 of Block FC) APPLICANT: Paul Washburn REQUEST: To rezone Lots 17 and 18 from R-1-B-2-D to R-4 and to modify the existing "D" designation for the R-4-D zoning on Lots 1,2 , 3 , and 4 . On February 17 , 1981 the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing unanimously adopting Findings 1-2 ,. authorizing a Negative Declaration and recommending approval of a zone change to R-4-D as noted in the attached Staff report with the "D to mean: 1. Development of the property, shall be limited to business and professional offices, personal services, motels and public • utility offices. 2. Provision shall be made to develop a ,suitable screening buffer which may include landscaping, fencing or similar between an office development and surrounding residential uses. 3 . Access shall be provided to the property only from Morro Road. 4 . Six-foot screening fencing shall be required on all interior lot lines abutting single family districts . 5. A 25-foot setback shall be provided along Santa Ynez provided, however, that building (s) not exceeding one story and fifteen (15) feet in overall .height and offstreet parking may encroach into said setback not more than fifteen (15) feet if appropriate landscaping, building architecture, and site design is utilized to minimize visual .impacts on adjacent residential properties. After brief discussion concerning the setback treatment on Santa Ynez , it was the consensus of the Commission that the zoning as recommended was consistent with the Special Commercial designation in the General Plan. The applicant, Mr. Washburn, appeared indicating his concurrence with t e recommendation. No one else appeared on the matter. LAWRENCE 9VEVENS ARRAWARDEN Planning rector anager CITY OF ATASCADERO r a!P1 � v r�r IIff Planning Department February 17 , 1981 1915 " rI C0 I� 1979 \ Sc�uERo� STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: Zone Change 2810105 :1 LOCATION: ' 8400 Morro Road (Lots 1, 2 ,3 ,4 ,17& 18 Block FC) APPLICANT: Paul Washburn REQUEST: To rezone Lots 17 & 18 from R-1-B-2-D to R-4 and to modify the existing "D" designation for the R-4-D zoning on Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4 . BACKGROUND 1. Existing Zone: R-4-D (532) for Lot 1, 2, 3 , and 4 and R-1-B-2-D (506) for Lots 17 and 18 . The D (506) means setbacks are equivalent to the required by the underlying R Zone while D (532) means: a. Department Review required of all uses. b. Multiple family projects shall require a minimum building • site of 10 , 000 square feet, with the number of allowable units determined by the following table: No. of Bedrooms Required Area Per Unit 1 2400 sq. ft. 2 3600 sq. ft. 3 4800 sq. ft. 4 5900 sq. ft. C. All developments shall emphasize the use of natural materials in exterior finishes., and landscaping to minimize visual impact of structures and soften paved areas. d. All yard areas abutting streets shall be considered front yards requiring 25-foot setbacks, to be landscaped with natural plant materials, with no off-street parking permitted therein. e. Maximum building height shall be 25 feet. f. Six-foot screening fencing shall be required on all interior lot lines abutting single-family districts. • • Page Two Staff Report: Zone Change Z810105:1 February 17 , 1981 g. All developments shall require review and approval of drainage plans by the County Engineering Department to minimize potential flooding problems. h. Signing shall not exceed 20 square feet aggregate area without conditional use permit approval. i. No new lots created less than 10 , 000 square feet. j . Offices are allowable uses in the C-R-D Zone. 2. General Plan: Special Commercial 3 . Environmental Determination: An Initial Study Environmental Description form has been competed. The Planning Director has issued a Negative Declaration indicating the project will not have a significant adverse environmental effect and the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report is not necessary. 4 . Site Conditions: The 1.6 acre lot is currently undeveloped and is generally level. Vegetation consists largely of natural grasses. Sewer and water •facilities are known to be available to the property. The property is bounded on the east by Morro Road, on the south and southwest by Santa Ynez Avenue, and on • the north by mixed residential . 5. Project Description: The applicant proposes to change the zoning on Lots 17 and 18 from R-1-B-2-D to R-4 . Additionally, the applicant proposes to modify the "D" designation of the existing R-4-D zoning and to incorporate the modification into the requested zoning. The changes to the zoning are requested in order to accommodate intended development with a two-phase office project of four one-story buildings, totally 18 ,500 square feet. The site plan for the intended development indi- cates a 10-foot setback along Santa Ynez . Basically, this setback represents a deviation from what is currently required (25 feet) and the applicant proposes that the "D" attachment to the requested and existing R-4 zone be modified to allow the reduction in setback along the street. The requested R-4 zoning is attempting to bring the property into conformance with the 1980 Atascadero General Plan. STAFF COMMENTS At the present time, the zoning ordinance does not have a zone which specifically corresponds to the Special Commercial land use desig- nation of the General Plan. However, as was indicated in the Project Description above, this zone change application is submitted in an effort to resolve the conflict between the existing zoning and the • General Plan. The intended development is considered consistent with the General Plan land use designation of Special Commercial. Page Three Staff Report: Zone Change 2810105: 1 February 17, 1981 • Until a Special Commercial Zone is developed for the zoning ordinance text, the R-4 zone would seem appropriate on an interim bases. The "D (532) " combining district designation of the existing R-4 zoning (covering lots 1,2, 3 and 4) currently requires, among other standards, that: "d. All yard areas abutting streets shall be considered front yards requiring 25-foot setbacks, to be landscaped with natural plant materials, with no off-street parking permitted therein. " This is more restrictive than the R-4 zoning would be without the D combining district. The intent is to provide a suitable buffer with adjacent single family residential uses by requiring the set- back to be identical in treatment to the R-1 Zone (i.e. , 25 feet in depth, parking prohibition) . This represents a fair and reasonable means to achieve a suitable buffer and similar approaches are often used when residential and commercial uses share the same road frontage. However, the goal of creating a suitable buffer can be achieved in many ways including building height restriction, vary permissible building height based on setback landscaping treatment to minimize the appearance of bulk, fencing requirements, access limitations for vehicles and/or pedestrians, parking prohibitions in setbacks, parking encroachments allowable based on specified performance standards, and numerous other similar techniques. It is important to remember that the selection of appropriate buffering techniques must consider not only the impacts on the commercial land owner, but also those on the residential land owner. The Commission should be aware that the Planning Department has approved a Departmental Review application for a commercial develop- ment on the subject property. The approval granted allows a 10 foot rear yard along Santa Ynez with the development of the second phase of the project. However, Phase II development is contingent upon a zone change for the R-1 portion of the property and a modification of D combining district standards. Buffering of the R-1 areas is achieved via landscapting, one-story building heights, building orientation, access restrictions, building architectural treatment, and fencing FINDINGS 1. The project will not have a significant adverse effect upon the environment and preparation of an Environmental Impact Report is not necessary. 2. The recommended rezoning is consistent with the Special Commercial designation by the 1980 Atascadero General Plan. • Page Four Staff Report: Zone Change Z810105 :1 February 17 , 1981 • RECOMMENDATION > Based upon the above finding, the Planning Department recommends as follows: A. Issuance of a Negative Declaration; and B. Approval of a change of zone from R-1-B-2-D and R-4-D(532) to R-4-D with the "D" to mean: 1. Development of the property shall be limited to business and professional offices, personal services, motels and public utility offices . 2. Provision shall be made to develop a suitable screening buffer which may include landscaping, fencing or similar between an office development and surrounding residential uses. 3 . Access shall be provided to the property only from Morro Road. 4 . Six-foot screening fencing shall be required on all • interior lot lines abutting single family districts. 5. A 25 foot setback shall be provided along Santa Ynez provided, however, that building (s) not exceeding one- story and fifteen (15) feet in overall height and off- street parking may encroach into said setback not more than fifteen (15) feet if appropriate landscaping, building architecture, and site design is utilized to minimize visual impacts on adjacent residential properties . ACTION TO APPROVE: Set motion to adopt a Negative Declaration and approve change of zone subject to findings and recommendations. TO DENY: Motion to deny, receive and file. REPORT PREPARED BY: MARY 'LE. BEATIE Asso fate Planner • REPORT APPROVED BY: LAWRENCE STEVENS Planning Director W R 6a ) n O X /? 3 - 401) �. z41 19 07 9 r I S 70°06' 40fW c�onyi 7tA _� s �O fir m03 !B `• _ .62� - 1 ,�``rr I" vJ o Ci S 70006' 401-W to 4 Se 40 ab w 4c o N �9r: Cv N 41 ,00` /reanf F .r Itn- .10 40 N� / 00. _ � I U1 n1 / w x �.� 7 LJ(532 4 T 4 t 6 34-q S !P251 _ N 26 ,53 -6 - y '� oo� 6 g 35 14 1 � 23 27 3 3 4 77io o 4 4 5-A 2 S z. 28 � 22 4 .�, i ► . 36 3 7gO Zg:�. 7�lt17 r Ca 2 u 9707Zb• 2 24 p z 6 2 �e 1 _ 37 .30 / 5✓ 091. 91 i 6 l� l2 •.. I LA 56 10 55 4. �� 20 21 20 54 � 57 9 22' S3 17 8 C 10 22 9 l 4 iz •� l8 1 1,10 52 16 23 18 11 IT 24. 60 k5 2 /6 ¢:�: 17 6 1 O 12 co t \q 25 16 62 15 63 ,, <7 (0, 6q p A d 2 :.. 2e ss _ ti a l2 13 `r'� v ft') a a Q E` 12 V C 3> b 3 I• , 17 16 • �32 . . 31 3S � 15 t4 X503 7 �6p�J 6 0 /0 Z GO �- . 2 6 8 _ 9 33 �'O /3 // 3 532 1 7 70 \ 2 35 9 ��wi 6 24 t / \ /-75'� 4A R, � I 41 0 ZD., 4 S `S l !I 3 R38/zr 2 j Y 33 8 2 q./ B X59 roe : 39 2 2g 3 1cO7 - / 30 5'� a, 40 31 / 3 34 VICINITY 6 30 36 3? �• I'. ZOA///l( � M 4 P 29 3 � � � .. 1 — "� `4 _ � ♦� '1���a f� J� � Jp�� \\ , if- � * J5/ �k Ir U' LL:-:. _..Ips ��F:A � (l. Z �• N'��,�'}� �� f 4 m r , tl � - �,♦ # \ •�f � N O 4 V� (a t Jr it �t_ 1 „�y�5 �j:•: 'r.... r• It tom, d i' i.�, `1 f ' *'. y\•._.,y, i f *.:s 1 :J� d :� (� 1+ .SLo + ...♦ 1 k F f t £- i• •' 9 1 ! �.vsu .. ' t ! S t r .- # /C_`• i .fit -�y � _ �•'.k..,x �' ¢ � � fit - 1 - r 1+w. •. .�. Y';;�y ;�.- •. ..�c *.rs s Y�' a a .s r _ t��� y,�� „ �zS _ P a 3 i kY k rte Vi O� i :. _ b•�t y � e _ '`" . . 1w 5 'F -i x`"e air. =` h j i. .�+�4�,a,.x.� .�. r-• _�- -. - � F"�_"'.'�'13�I{ .ice ..� �� i � L �.?. tt .�� 4 a +� gyp• ti �a '� rS'.T t i t3 *• _ ov ,1 O l♦ �'� �•�� \ �y�4 �\� � �4 I .�� F 4�+. *;� 3�. r Y r �?`P �1+o:�`y! Z "i``t, T, � ".+e°s. t� f��• � ?;� �+,�'�!c°aa,' ',� z' ��' �`�"� Y � \7 \v 1• a (v' � i d � C 'C, � e.\ t '♦ 'k ° > ----•r 'a a, s x`+. �E�. C �s� r `4 t�'t r " ��y,- Qn �a+ v� c M1 z s z y t� �.= A} \ '� fit• '\' * q�' • Y � F � T A f }i � � ]p � f ) / cpY x' '•!�'�,E +`-: c 11. "-`� ♦t\w' s Ya K L 3y s i >�? rf 7t�'*;g°-z� 0 ♦ f'- yn .� • I: ~t ? -* •.2 X'-,.,t� CL, 4. ,/r ,h ✓k_. ..`1 s a;`" Ski !'s.1LT i`'"' at'�" ✓{.�V IWO. ' 1C � ,.3 �� \�i�A_^ u "✓ � ,'�sii l� ::.t♦, �M¢: {�y � z..w} j._'� * �s�}'7� Zo � '� 1.X s.N d �f� t'y'�'.'•"'�r�'+ae• x'� RPh ��+�., Ay r ` Al +' `� r r fxr A ,G# twltft"" 4r' + `vrzf :ice � � t�•( ,a�r�3�,�� yr�7w�..�i'"'k .rs: `, tett -.'.� •t�r#t'.= t r \ ea .; k _ 7c'"� s `� t«?y ° "ti'' 'e'7y` � �i � f+. C r sF`{ ',;fsf�gi,a j I� k♦ 1 i.A:�wlFel •�i.titY� 3 $ 't l }•Y` '�d!'#r.�L1W.�J�LY�tFij�Ii�lLla�-F. x 7; .Y.•t w. n "�,I? <,•� ORDINANCE NO. 38 • AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO AMENDING SECTION MAP 12-0-33 OF THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAPS OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO BY PLACING CERTAIN PROPERTY IN THE R-4-D ZONE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO ORDAINS as follows : Section-l. -Council Findings After conducting a public hearing, the City Council finds and determines that: 1. The project will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment and preparation of an Environmental Impact Report is not necessary. 2. The recommended rezoning is consistent with the Special Commercial designation by the 1980 Atascadero General Plan. Based upon these findings , a change of zone from R-1-B-2-D and R-4-D (532) to R-4-D with the "D" to mean: • 1 . Development of the property shall be limited to business and professional offices, personal services, motels and public utility offices. 2 . Provision shall be made to develop a suitable screening buffer which may include landscaping, fencing, or similar between an office development and surrounding residential uses. 3 . Access shall be provided to the property only from Morro Road. 4 . Six-foot screening fencing shall be required on all interior lot lines abutting single family districts. 5. A 25-foot setback shall be provided along Santa Ynez pro- vided, however, that building (s) not exceeding one story and fifteen (15) feet in overall height and off-street parking may encroach into said setback not more than fifteen (15) feet if appropriate landscaping, building architecture, and site design is utilized to minimize visual impacts on adjacent residential properties . Section 2 . Zoning Change • Map 12-0-33 of the Official Zoning Maps of the City of Atas cadero on file in the City Planning Department is hereby amended to reclassify the following described property from R-1-B-2-D and R-4-D (532) to R-4-D: Ordinance No. 38 • Page Two • Lots 1,2, 3 ,4 ,17 , and 18 in Block FC of Atascadero Colony, in the City of Atascadero, County of San Luis Obispo, • State of California. Section 3 . Zoning Map Map 12-0-33 of the Official Zoning Maps of the City of Atas- cadero on file in the City Planning Department is hereby amended as shown on attached Exhibit "A" which is hereby made a part of this ordinance by reference. Section- 4 . Publication The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published once within fifteen (15) days after its passage in the Atascadero News, a newspaper of general circulation, printed, published and circulated in the City in accordance with Section 36933 of the Government Code; shall certify the adopting and posting of this ordinance and shall cause this ordinance and this certification together with proof of posting to be entered into the Book of Ordinances of this City. Section 5 . -Effective Date This ordinance shall go into effect and be in full force and effect at 12 :01 a.m. on the 31st day after its passage. • The foregoing ordinance was introduced on and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on AYES : NOES : ABSENT: ROBERT J. WILKINS? JR. , Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: MURRAY WARDEN, City Clerk Approved as to form: M RAY . WARDEN, City Planager ALLEN GRIMES, City Attorney • • s �o 10 7 'P �P 6 4 IZ j o MU F M1 t3 / 14 I t5 116 a Profess17 sono y � Q) � Desr9ne Deve1 Amenf 1 � ,• 5,4N7-4I io8 99 iao 76 69 , °� YNEZ AVE s 190 53 20"E ��h EXHIBIT „q „ ORDINANCE No, 36 Z 7810105: I R-1-B-2-D and R-4-D (532) to R-4-D with the "D" to mean: 1. Development of the property shall be limited to business and professional offices, personal services , motels, and public utility offices . 2 . Provision shall be made to develop a suitable screening buffer which may include landscaping, fencing or similar between an office development and surrounding residential uses . 3 . Access shall be provided to the property only from Morro Road. 4 . Six-foot screening fencing shall be required on all interior lot lines 0 abutting single family districts. 5. A 25 foot setback shall be provided along Santa Ynez provided, however, that building (s) not exceeding one story and fifteen (15) feet in overall height and offstreet parking may encroach into said setback not more than fifteen (15) feet if appropriate landscaping, -building architecture, and site design is utilized to minimize visual impacts on adjacent residential ;. /J/� ROBERT J.WILKINS,JR. • 1B ( MAYOR `4/ WILLIAM H.STOVER MAYOR PRO-TEMPORE GEORGE P. HIGHLAND MARJORIE B. MACKEY INCORPORATED JULY 2,1979 • ROLFE NELSON MURRAY L.WARDEN ADMINISTRATION BUILDING CITY MANAGER/CLERK POST OFFICE BOX 747 ATASCADERO,CALIFORNIA 93422 FIRE DEPARTMENT PHONE (805) 466.8000 6005 LEWIS AVENUE ATASCADERO,CA 93422 (805) 466-2141 REPORT FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY For the Council Meeting of March 10, 1981 No. 11 1. REPORT OF THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES LEGAL ADVOCACY COMMITTEE • The Legal Advocacy Committee Report of February 9, 1981 indicates that the Committee reviewed approximately 35 cases ofsignificanceto cities now pending in the state trial and appellate courts. The Committee and the League Board of Directors have recommended amicus participation through city attorneys in consenting cities for the following case: City of Modesto v. Fair Employment and Housing Commission (Reddig) This case is now on appeal by the Commission and raises not only a question relating to personnel relations under the discrimination provisions of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act, but also serious risk management issues. As reported in the last Com- mittee Report, ;the case arose after the City of Modesto terminated Mr. Reddig as a city building inspector when the results of an em- ployment physical indicated that his chronic heart and lung ailments placed him in a very high risk category relative to disability while working. Reddig successfully appealed his termination to the Fair Employment and Housing Commission on allegations that the discharge constituted a violation of Labor Code Section 1420(a) (now Government Code Section 12940(a) ) which prohibits discharging an employee due to physical handicap. The City maintained that the discharge was authorized by subdivision (1) of the same section, which permits an employer to discharge a physically handicapped employee due to such handicap, and on those grounds subsequently obtained a Superior Court ruling overturning the adverse decision of the Commission. Since • similar issues are being raised throughout the State in both discharge REPORT FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY No. 11 - Page 2 and employment contgxts and because there are no prior appellate opin- ions interpreting these provisions of the Fair Employment and Housing Act, the Committee and Board of Directors have recommended that con- senting cities join in an amicus curiae brief to be filed in support ( of the City of Modesto. Richard R. Terzian, of the Los Angeles firm of Burke, Williams & Sorensen, who is representing the City of Whittier in a similar action, has volunteered to prepare such an amicus brief in which cities may join at no cost. All city attorneys are urged to consider joining as amici in the case and to do so should contact: George H. Eiser, Deputy City Attorney, 801 llst Street, P.O. Box 642, Modesto, CA 95353, (209) 577-5284. Other cases which the Legal Advocacy Committee simply directed the dissemi- nation of information with respect to them are: a. Woods Mobile Country Club Park v. Clovis City Mobile Rent Review Com- mission, et al. This case is on appeal following the denial of a writ of mandamus by which petitioner sought to set aside the action of the City Commission as affirmed by the City Council limiting its rent increase to 7%. b. City of South Lake Tahoe v. Cory This action was originally filed in E1 Dorado County Superior Court. The City seeks an order compelling the State Controller to cease and • desist any "offset" of monies due the City under the bail-out provi- sions of Government Code Section 16250. The action was filed following a $60,000 reduction in the amount of state subventions normally due the City. C. City of Sacramento v. State of California, et al. This is an action for writ of mandate under CCP Section 1094.5 by which the City seeks SB 90 reimbursement for its unemployment insurance costs for city employees. The action was filed after denial by the Board of Control of the claim for reimbursement on the ground that the 1978 state law including local government employees under the State Unemployment Insurance Program was enacted to implement or carry out the mandate of federal law. The City's position before the Board and in its mandate action is that the legislation is in fact a state man- date and not an implementation of federal law. d. City of Petaluma v. Dowds, et al. This case is on appeal following a Superior Court ruling granting the City's motion for summary judgment in its action for injunctive relief against defendants, who allegedly operated a heavy trucking business from their home in a resiaential district contrary to the zoning ordi- nance. Defendants argue that the restriction is a violation of due - process and equal protection, and thus amounts to a "taking" by the City. REPORT FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY No. 11 - Page 3 • e. City of Beverly Hills v. Marvin Hime & Co. This case is now pending on appeal following a trial court judgment ordering the appellant to abate as public nuisances window signs on his premises which are in violation of the City's Municipal Code and sustaining demurrers without leave to amend to a cross-complaint for conspiracy to selectively prosecute. The City Code permits one busi- ness identification sign, and by his own admission defendant has four such signs on his business premises, three of which are window signs obstructing more than 25%,of the view or light through the window in violation of other City Code provisions. While installed prior to the current City regulations, the signs were required to be abated as nonconforming within five years after the 1969 sign regulations were adopted. Appellant contends that the sign regulations are violative of First Amendment guarantees of free speech. 2. RECENT DECISIONS OF INTEREST a. Control of Annexation The C.A. 2nd has held that the question of whether a city is to be annexed is decided by an election conducted among the voters of the territory to be annexed. This case upholds the validity of the Municipal Organization and Government Act (MORGA) . The city to which • the annexation i to be made has no say unless the annexation were to i crease the residents by 50% or t e a ed value by 50%. b. Statute's Administrative Construction to be Given Weight The C.A. 4th has held that, in construing a provision in the city charter which is ambiguous on its face, the consistent administrative construction of that provision over many years is entitled to great weight. (Casteaneda v. Holcomb, C.A. 4th, January 20, 1981) C. Statutory Firemen Immunity Only While Fighting Fires The C.A. 4th has held that Government Code Section 850.4, which pro- vides that a public entity is not liable for an injury caused in fighting fires, does not bar an action for the negligence of a fireman in the scope of his employment other than fighting a fire. (Potter v. City of Oceanside, C.A. 4th, January 12,1981) d. Use of Zoning Law to Control Adult Bookstore The C.A. 4th has held that a city may not use a zoning or conditional use ordinance to do what it could not do under a licensing statute with respect to regulating the operation of adult bookstores. There- fore, it held that the city ordinance attempting to regulate or pro- hibit adult bookstores was invalid. (City of Imperial Beach v. Palm Avenue Books, Inc. , C.A. 4th, January 23, 1981) REPORT FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY No. 11 - Page 4 • e. Court Findings The C.A. 1st has held that written findings of fact and conclusions of law are required in municipal court only if they are expressly requested before the court announces its intended decision. (Zenker- Felt Imports v. Malloy, C.A. 1st, February 4, 1981) f. CEQA Exemption Upheld The C.A. 1st has upheld a County Planning Commission's grant of a categorical exemption to & cement manufacturer from the filing of an Environmental Impact Report under California's 1970 Environmental Quality Act for the manufacturer's plans to modernize its plant. (Dhne v. County of Santa Clara (Kaiser Cement and Gypsum Corp.) , C.A. 1st, February 9, 1981) alidity of Lot Split The C.A. has held that approval of a lot split by the City Planning Commission is invalid if .the proceedings were conducted without prior notice and hearing fort e a ec e wners. The Court furt er state e nature and extent o the notice that must be af- forded and quoted the recent case of Horn v. County of Ventura with approval. h. No Prisoner Immunity • The C.A. has held that there is no "prisoner immunity"from liability for injuries to persons held in civil protective custody. The case defines the meaning of the term "prisoner". (Meyer v. City of Oakland, 107 C.A. 3rd 717, 1980) i. Sick Leave The C.A. has ruled that unilateral imposition of sick leave rules in response to a police "sick-out" is unauthorized. Sick leave rules are a subject within meet and confer, and sick leave rules must be adopted only after complying with proper procedures. j. Discharge of Public Employee for Political Beliefs The U.S. Supreme Court has held that the discharge of a public employee with satisfactory job performance simply because of his political beliefs is unconstitutional as being in violation of the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution. (Branti v. Finkel, 63 L.Ed. 2nd, 574, 1980) 3. PENDING LITIGATION a. City of Atascadero v. Daly, et al. The case has been fully briefed on appeal by both Appellant and Re- spondents. The next activity to occur is for the Appellate Court to set the time and place for oral argument. REPORT FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY No. 11 - Page 5 • b. Snow, Atascadero Firefighters Association v. City of Atascadero, et al. As last scheduled, the hearing on Petitioners' petition for writ of mandate (and now for a summary judgment) to require the City to honor the MOU between the Firefighters Association and the former Atascadero Fire Protection District is set for Friday, March 13, at 8:45 A.M. in Department III of the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo County 4. MISCELLANEOUS I attended the meeting of the Tri-Counties City Attorneys Association at the Santa Barbara Miramar on Friday, February 20, 1981. Approximately a dozen city attorneys or their assistants were in attendance and listened to an extensive and detailed agenda presentation. Respectfull submitted, ALLEN GRIMES City Attorney AG:fr M_E M_O_R A N_D_U M_ TO: City Council FROM: City Manager SUBJECT: Parks and Recreation Advisory Board member At the last Council meeting, you were advised of the resignation of David Cannon from the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board. At that time, Council decided that appli- cants who had been interviewed last August would be con- tacted to determine if they are still interested in the position. The following applicants have indicated that they are still interested in serving on the Board: Richard Brown Katheryne Evans Richard Ivie John Harris ;�-) Scott Morlan _bEarl Pearson Jim Porter `!=Peggy Robertson Attached are their original letters submitted for the first selection. If you decide to select one of the above, he or she can be seated at the next Board meeting on March 12, 1981. *RR WARDEN MLW:ad 3-5-81 s 4320 Cayucos Avenue Atascadero, CA 93422 25 July 1980 City Council City of Atascadero Atascadero, California 93422 Dear Council Members: The purpose of this letter is to enter my name for consider- ation of selection to the recreation advisory board you plan to establish. The attached resume outlines my qualifications for membership to the board. My primary reason for desiring a seat on this board is so that I may utilize the experience I have gained in school as well as in my professional life as a former Marine Corps officer and as an avid sportsman in establishing a foundation for the recreational future of Atascadero. Northern S.L.O. County has countless recreational opportunities capable of providing recreational activities to satisfy the entire range of interests of Atascadero's population. The judicious development or preservation of these resources will ensure the positive development of the region as well as the availability of these resources to future generations. I feel I could contribute to the making of these decisions and look forward to my selection interview. Sincerely, Richard A. Brown Enclosure RICHARD A. BROWN 4320 Cayucos Avenue Atascadero, CA 93422 466-5073 Objective: To serve the citizens of Atascadero as a member of the recreation advisory board. Education: Bachelor of Science in Recreation Resource Management 1974, Oregon State University, Corvallis , Oregon Personal Recreation Length of Time Interests and Abilities: Activity Involved NAUI & U.S. Navy trained Scuba Diver 12 years Photography 12 years Marathon Runner 1 year Snow Skiing 5 years Water Skiing 5 years Golf 5 years Swimming 12 years (High School Varsity Letterman) Military Record: Date Commissioned: 23 December 1974 EAS: 24 December 1978 Branch of Service: United States Marine Corps Rank Last Held: First Lieutenant Specialized Training: U.S. Army Basic Airborne Course, Ft. Benning, GA; U.S. Navy Scuba School , San Diego, CA Noteworthy Accomplishments: U.S.M.C. Honor Graduate, Oregon State University, Corvallis , OR; Commanding General 's Honor List, The Basic School , MCDEC Quantico, VA Reserve Status: Inactive Reserve Personal Data: Marital Status: Married Number of Children: T Height: 5'11 " Weight: 165 lbs. Citizenship: U.S. Occupation: Sales Representative, Pfizer Laboratories July 28, 1980 To Whom It May Concerns This is an informal application for the Atascadero Recreation Advisory Hoard. Enclosed is my resume for your consideration and perusal. It reflects my background, ex- perience, and education in the field of recreation which, I feel, would be useful to the Recreation Advisory Hoard. Sincerely, r Katheryne Evans "lU, s- _ _"c "'z.• ., +�"'$",a., a. ra�K'eti`.a''ra`..,w.x KATHERYNE ELL0N FVANS 9538 Los Palos Road Atascadero, California T3422 805-466-9592 Place of Birth: Whiteriver, Arizona Date of birth: October 14, 1933 freight: 125 lbs. Height: 5 ' 4" Marital :Status: Separated, Three Children Interests: The Arts, Group D,ira:uics, Swimming EDUCATION 1951 , 1955-56 Santa Monica City College, Santa Monica., California 1954 Florida State University Extension, Eglin Air Force Base , Florida . 1956-57 El Camino College, ll Camino, California 1957-58 iuiversity of California at Los Angeles 1973 Fall University of California, Santa -Barbara Extension Atascadero State hospital, Atascadero, California 1974-78 'C&lifurnia Polytechnic :hate University, San Luis Obispo, Califoraia Bachelor of Arts blegree in Recreation Adiniuimtration Winter 1: 78 1978-80 California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, Califoraia Course work cowpleted for piaster of Arts be,gree in . Education, Counseling and Guidance LXPLRI EN Cr Feuruary 1y52-54 United States Air Force Stenographer Eglin Air Force base , Florid& arapower Office Headquarters Squadron 1958-1972 Homemaker 1972-77 Ataseadero State Hospital Library Student Assistant Program III Secretary Program IV Research Assistant Atascadero , California 1977 Steamer A-tascadero Suiumer Recreation Prograja Co-Director Atascadero , California 1478 ,'riikter Craft Center , Escape Route , travel Undergraduate Intern Center 1cti.vities Plauning Center California Polytechnic Mate University, San Lui9 Obispo , Calituraia 1977-79 At . adero Community Projects s3oa.rd of Directors Council , Atascadero, California 1978 Spring New Games Festiva P 1 `oo G rdivator Atascadero, California 1978-79 Recreation Director Lutheran' Church Vacation Bible School, Atascadero, California 1978-79 Activities Planning Center Graduate Intern/Pro- California Polytechnic State gramming University. San Luis Obispo, California 1979 Fall Physical Education Department Instructor Recreation Administration California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, California 198U Atascadero :State hospital Leisure Counselor Program IV Atascadero , California PRO FES SI OVAL ORGANIZATIONS American Personnel and Guidance Association (APGA) American College Personnel Association (ACPA) CLRTlFICA LS Standard first Aid and Personal Safety Aavanced Lifesaving and iaLer Safety Water Safety Instructor I3EFLRENC.ES Dr. Robert Meyers Recreation Administration Coordinator California Polytechnic State University 8U5-546-2604 Mr. Tom Lee Recreation Administration California Polytechnic State University 805-546-2604 Mr. }candy Oonant Activities Planning Center California Polytechnic State University 8U5-546-2476 ► A .AZ;" s F r A3,��t�J�'xq 4p""'' Y- 'u� e.�.�• ,t.: {q,+ T w- �R'k � F2>� 4.g y } � A I s- ,, ,r ✓ z p w3 s- s W �.+�'—ca«r..dy..eor . � ,.r t a. +4wm> 1 .�+4me�x+.aw+x+f"11 Y�rrf•�+ � yr,prr` , f 71. 77 ` j a 6—c23-- -NNW —c23-- 360 1 9�4 eak 7t27 _ R 7 h , (//(/�YA /T//�. Z�c _ � n -.a c -"- ,ir �°°e"-•' rx u ddnweaF, u�:w �.m�,w•wt1.Mk'�`r^ hx�e -ry.�+' - �.�.�• ...,w-,gra �..+�m�.e.-��.,..��r,.�;�-w. � 'e'..'..ri• sr,.. � �, � .,r r �.,.. � �. "�"r.y ...�".. _ v M.x�,'°i6�,3ct ;_3 •4.7�;y�.�?� t.3-'x:x� #��"4tx` /-�_�, � f C,XJ4 Jc 3 -/C) Au T �o: Atascadero City Council From: John H. Harris , 3955 Amargon, 466-64c'2 nECEIVED JUL 2 3 1980 Subject : Recreation Compission Representative I would like to inform you of my interest to serve on the recreation Commission for the City of Atascadero. My reasons for serving on this Commission are the followink: I believe in the importance of a recreation program in a city, I am interested in helping provide cneaninuful services related to recreational pursuits for the citizens of Atascadero; I am trained professionally in the field of parks and recreation and can contribute professional expertise; I desire to increase my community service here in Atascadero; and I enjoy working Tflith people of diverse interests . A brief resume of pertinent information Education: Ey masters and Ph. D. are in Forest Recreation and Outdoor Recreation from Utah State University, Experience; Evaluated over 50 T,'.aster Plans for cities concerning the provision of parks and recreation services. Developed two city master plans for Park Districts in • Illinois. Comprehensively evaluated the recreational services for a city of 250, 000. University professor in the field of parks and recreation for 9 years Professional Efforts ; Affiliated with the 'following professional organizations: California Park and Recreation Society, National Recreation and Park Association. G,'rote two open space grants totaling 90,000 for the City of iviacomb, Illinois . Recreation Supervisor with the Los Angeles County Recreation Department . Developed several sessions for the state parks and recreation conference. i To Whom It May Concern Please accept this resume as an indication of my sincere interest anal desire to be on a Board of Recreation for Atascadero City. I would like to see Atascadero develope a Recreational Program of its own for all ages , to encourage and provide facilities and programs for the people of Atascadero and of the entire North County. Sincerely, Scott Morlan SM:dt Enc. r SCOTT K. MORLAN Residence Address Business Address 7565 Cortina Ave. 5852 West Mall Atascadero, CA. 93422 Atascadero, CA. 93422 Personal Information Place of Birth: Pasadena, California Date of Birth: March 9 , 1950 Height: 6 ' 2" Weight : 210 lbs . Marital Status Married Physical Condition: Excellent Education 1970-73 California Polytechnic State University San Luis Obispo, California - Bachelor of Science Degree in Physical Education, Recreation Concentration 1968-70 Allan Hancock Community College, Santa Maria, CA. Associate of Arts Degree, Physical Education Major 1965-68 Santa Maria High School , Santa Maria, CA. Courses Included Administration of Recreation Human Relations Community Recreation Public Relations Intramural Sports Marketing Recreation Management Accounting Natural Resource Management Graphic Communication Organizations Rotary Chamber of Commerce Atascadero Jaycees California Association for Health, Physical Education, Recreation Delta Sigma Phi International Fraternity Alumni Association Experience Recreational: Internship with SLO Recreational Department and SLO Unified Schools as 5th, 6th and 7th grade coach Management: Owner Cedars Restaurant , SLO Manager Danish Inn, Buellton Pea Soup Anderson, Santa Maria Professional: Life Insurance Agent , Mutual Benefit Life , SLO Multiple Lines Ins . Agent, State Farm, Atascadero Personal References Judge Richard Kirkpatrick 6291 Monterey Court Atascadero, CA. i- May 10, 1980 To whom it may concern, I would like to submit my name, Earl W. Pearson, as a candidate for the Atascadero Parks and Recreation Commission or Committee. I have been involved with the San Luis Obispo City Parks and Recreation Commission, and haue over five years of experience with parks and recreation departments. I worked for the San Luis Obispo and Morro Bay, and with the Paso Robles departments. I have a Bachelor of Science degree in Physical Education with a concentration in Recreation. I also have teaching creditials in Physical Education and Vocation Education. I have lived in Atascadero for nearly five years and in the county since 1970. I have a family and plan to stay in the area to raise my children. I am presently teaching at Paso Robles High school and a guest speaker at Atascadero and Templeton High schools. I feel that with my knowledge and experience, I could be of great assistance to the committee. Thank you for your time and considerance. Sincerely, Earl W. Pearson II' July 25, 1980 I3onorable City Council City of Atascadero P.O. Bax 717 Atascadero, CA 93122 Dear Council Members:: This is to inform you of my interest in being appointed to the city's Parks and Recreation Advisory Board. I have lived in Atascadero for 31 years. I'm 35 years old and my rife Shirley and I have two sons-, Gary, 14, and Greg, 5. I have served as a volunteer fireman, served a term as president of Atascadero Jaycees and as a director on Atascadero Chamber of Commerce and Itm presently a menber of Atascadero Rotary Club.. I hold an JU degree in. Business Administration. Along -vrith two brothers,_ I an. co-publisher of the Atascadero Ileus. I endorsed the need for cityhood because Itve alzrays believed a city government could better serve the needs of our local people. I see a recreation department as one which would serve people of all ages, from youth, young adults and senior citizens, and in areas: other than athletic events. I have played both high school and college sports. I have played and coached AYA baseball and basketball.. For four year: I officiated both high school football and wrestling in the Los Padres League. I'm familiar with the recreation program in Paso Robles because Itve played in the adult basketball program. My hobbies including golf and waterskiing. Sincerely, . Jim Porter t s 6-20-80 To The City Council : ? Regarding the possiblity of a Recreation Department for the city of Atascadero , I would like to offer any aid through whatever experience I have had . In 1975 I became involved in youth recreation tia my sons participation in AYA Baseball , first as a parent supporter, then in publicity . In 1976 I became a general board member of AYA and remained in publicity . Meanwhile I participated through booster clubs and individual efforts to support girls sports , by being at games (ie)basketball , softball ,volleyball and gymnastics , by taking' sports pictures , which were sometimes utilized by the Atascadero News . I also endeavored to widen the acre ptance level of girls sports by contacting the TV Media, an endeavor that continues to need persistent pursuing. I .was also a member of the local. group, Friends of Music and actively .campaigned for.- the new High school Band uniforms . In 1978 I became 2nd Vice President of the AYA General Board , Sponsor Chairman for Basketball and Mid-team Baseball , while "stil remaining in Publicity,. In, 1979 I maintained my ,Vice Presidency , bedame Babe Ruth Secretary, remaining involved in publicity . I am, however narrow my experience has been, interested in a recreation department of broad concept , which includes all ages, sizes and abilities . When Atascadero was marching toward Cityhood , I participated on the Recreation and Parks commit tee with Marge Mackay , Tom Russell , and Ruth Doser , knowing some day Atascadero would be blessed with her very own facility. 2 . I would like very much to be a part of that happening and offer my services herewith toward that goal . Sincerely Yours , • Peggy Robertson 7495 Santa Ysabel X613 Atascadero , Ca . 93422 (805) 466-4049 M E M O RAN D U M • TO: City Council FROM: City Manager SUBJECT: General Plan amendment schedule At your last meeting, you approved a procedure for amending the General Plan to provide for scheduled amend- ment periods plus one floating period. However, in con- sidering the first update, not enough time was allowed for submission of proposed changes. It is my suggestion, therefore, that we accept any proposed amendments up to the time of the actual advertised public hearing before the Planning Commission. This will allow additional time for any suggested amendments not yet received. The Planning Commission, at its March 16th meeting, will be discussing the the procedure, but will not be considering recommenda- tions for changes. They will be doing that during the first part of April. If you do not object to such an extension, we will publish this change and will accept applications as outlined above. UR L. WARDEN . MLW:ad 3-5-81 0 • M E M O R A N D U M TO: CITY MANAGER , February 18 , 1981 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: Schedule for general plan amendments On February 17 , 1981 the Planning Commission reviewed the attached Staff Report recommending the use of a biannual amendment system. In brief discussion the primary reasons for the Planning Commis- sion recommendation were those noted in the Staff report. i LAWRENCE EVENSRRA WARDEN PlanningUi rector City anagen /Ps CITY OF ATASCADERO r 01-A Planning Department February 17 , 1981 1918 � 1979 \ATASDQ� STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: Schedule for general amendments BACKGROUND ' 1. Section 65361 of the Government Code provides as follows : "No mandatory element of a general plan shall be amended more frequently than three times during any calendar year, which amendment or amendments may occur at any time as determined by the _legis- lative body. This section shall not apply to the adoption of any element to the general plan. 2. The General Plan Guidelines state (p. 69) : "While the law does not clearly define what consti- tutes an amendment, case law has interpreted this section to allow each of the three amendments to encompass several different changes (Karlson vs . City of Camarillo (1980) 100 Cal . App. 3d 789) . Many local governments have established regular procedures for periodically amending their gen- eral plans. At three times during the year, they group several proposals for change, analyze their cumulative effects, review them, and act upon the package. " -COMMENTS It is not desirable to allow frequent piecemeal amendments to the general plan although it must remain a dynamic document subject to continuous change as the needs and values of the community dictate. These needs and values must, however, be perceived in the public interest rather than on the desires of an individual owner or group of owners. As a result, hearings for a general plan amendment affecting one property or a similar interest should not proceed merely on the basis of an application having been filed. Some concurrence by the Planning Commission and/or the City Council on the public interest merits of the proposal seem appropriate before initiating the process . I Page Two Re: Schedule for General Amendments February 17 , 1981 The time needed for the amendment process itself ,can vary from 3-6 months (or longer) depending upon the complexity of the amendments being undertaken, the environmental review needed, the controversy generated, and appeals, among other factors . In determining a schedule, it is therefore important to allow enough flexibility to accommodate the time variations in order to avoid overlapping into a .subsequent calendar year. The available alternatives include annual amendments, biannual amendments, and triannual amendments. Sample schedules for each are as follows ANNUAL: March 1 filing deadline July/September effective date of action BIANNUAL: Cycle 1 October 1 - filing deadline January/March effective date of action -Cycle 2 March 1 - filing deadline • July/September effective date of action TRIANNUAL -Cycle 1 October 1 filing deadline January/March effective date of action Cycle 2 February 1 - filing deadline May/July - effective date of action Cycle 3 June 1 filing deadline .September/November - effective date of action Both the annual and biannual systems allow- for -floating period(s) .' -i These could be used to accommodate periodic review and updating of all elements of the general plan. Page Three Re: Schedule for General Amendments February 17 , 1981 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that a biannual amendment system be instituted with Cycle 1 beginning October 1 and Cycle 2 beginning March 1. (Note: This would allow additional applications to be filed until March 1 at which time all such applications together with any previously filed applications would begin the review period. ) -ACTION TO APPROVE: Move to transmit Staff recommendation to City Council. TO DENY: Direct Staff as, deemed appropriate, • REPORT PREPARED/APPROVED BY: LAWRENCE STEVENS Planning Director • /Ps l l i M E M O R A N D U M TO: Murray Warden FROM: Larry McPherson SUBJECT: New Furnishings - Rotunda Room Recommendation: It is recommended that you request Council authorize the transfer of $1,700 from contingency reserves for the purchase of 25 new folding banquet tables for the upper Rotunda Room. Background: I am increasingly concerned about the condition of the folding tables used for public and private functions in City facilities. When we took over the inventory of folding • tables , many were discarded or used for parts to repair the tables that were still serviceable. We now only have 5 usable steel reinforced folding tables with the balance being the old, hand-made, wood braced tables. I am recommending we discontinue the use of the wood tables for all activities sponsored by outside groups and replacing these tables with new steel braced folding tables. It is pro- jected that 25 new tables would satisfy our immediate needs. The estimated cost is $1,700. This purchase has not been budgeted,however, I believe the need to replace the tables is eminent. /s/� AAWRENCE McPHERSON _ LM:vh '��"'� 2-20-81 ��� /� M E M O RAN D U M f TO: City Council FROM: City Manager SUBJECT: Telephone equipment proposals You had previously approved the bid for purchasing a telephone system, however, upon our request for resubmittal, we have found a considerable decrease in costs. At the same time as we received a new proposal from General Telecom we sought and received another proposal from Pacific Telephone. The basic equipment costs are essentially the same, however, over a five year comparison period, Pacific Telephone costs $7 , 600 more because of line and maintenance charges. If some salvage value is given to the General Telecom equipment at the end of the five year period, the difference between the two proposals is even greater. Assuming a $10, 000 salvage value to the hardware, provides .a $17,800 difference between the two systems. This analysis assumes that at the end of the fifth year, the system would be completely replaced; although this is by no means a certainty, even though technology may' have changed during the five year period. But the question is whether that technological • change will warrant scrapping an entire system. I do not remember the last time a city scrapped an entire system within five years . Insofar as hardware capabilities are concerned, both Pacific Telephone and General Telecom offered the same benefits. Recommend your reaffirmation of this approval of the General Telecom bid. 0RR1 'AY WARDEN MLW:ad 3-5-81 M E M O R A N D U M • TO: Murray Warden FROM: Larry McPherson - SUBJECT: Telephone Equipment Proposals Recommendation: It is recommended that the proposal by General Telecom to install a telephone system in the Administration Building be accepted. _ Their proposal meets all the specified re- quirements and the installed cost is $26 ,152. 00 plus tax. The amount budgeted for this project is $37,466 . 00 Background: The equipment proposed by General Telecom is essentially the same as was in the original bid submitted to the City about 6 months ago by Telephone West. The local personnel of the Talk Shop in Paso Robles have recently affiliated with General Telecom and are now apparently able to offer the equipment at more competitive rates. It is my opinion that the equipment proposed meets the re- quirements of our proposal request and is flexable enough to meet the needs of the City into the forseeable future. I have enclosed both proposals for your review and I feel both General Telecom and Pacific Telephone have submitted very similar telephone systems. Since the equipment supplied by Pacific Telephone remains their property, I have attached a 5 year system cost comparison to be able to evaluate the submittals. It should be noted that using a longer than 5 year term for comparison, will substantially increase the favorability of the General Telecom system. You can see, using a 5 year cost schedule, the General Telecon system would cost the City $17,553. 26 less than the Pacific Telephone system. AWRENCE McPHERSON LM:vh 2-23-81 cc: Finance Dir. • 5-YEAR TELEPRONE SYSTEM COST COMPARISON General Telecom Pacific Telephone System Cost $26 ,152. 00 $22 ,619 . 06 Installation Cost -0- 3 ,447. 00 Total System Cost $26 ,152 . 00 $26 ,066. 06 Salvage Value (5 Year) $10 ,000 .00 -0- Actual Ownership Cost $16 ,152. 00 26 , 066. 06 Line Charges $179. 00 X 60 Included in =$10,740. 00 Figures Below Maintenance Charges $150. 00 X 48 $426 . 32 X 60 $7,200. 00 $25,579 . 20 Total Ownership Costs for 5 Years $34 ,092 . 00 $51,645.26 ($6 , 818. 40/year) ($10 ,329. 05/year) M E M O R A N D U M iTO: City Manager FROM: Finance birector SUBJECT: Selection of Audit Proposal, Fiscal Year 1980-81 Robert M. Moss Accountancy Corporation was selected for our Fiscal Year 1979-80 audit based upon the evaluation of proposals submitted by several firms. The Moss Accountancy Corporation accomplished a highly professional audit and has provided follow-up assistance as we refined our procedures throughout the fiscal year. At my request,: they have submitted a proposal for accomplishing our Fiscal Year 1980-81 audit for $2,000 . The current budget contains $3,000 for the audit process. I recommend the City Council accept the Robert M. Moss Accountancy Corporation bid of $2, 000 for the Fiscal Year 1980-81 audit. ' This recommendation is based primarily on maintaining continuity with an Auditor who is familiar with both the municipal process and the construction of our accounting system. t<` RALPH H. DOWELL, JR. Y,..,s, � RHD:ad 2-20-81 • i i M E M O R A N D U M • TO: City Council FROM: City Mandger SUBJECT: Revised Budget, Fiscal Year 1980-81 The attached memo from the Finance Director and revised budget pages reflect changes made throughout the last quarter as well as recommended adjustments. As you will recall, we knew that we would be making adjustments throughout the year in order to assure that our Proposition 4 base year was properly formulated. Please note that there is an item in the Public Works Street Department for standby pay. I have not had an oppor- tunity to thoroughly consider the proposals for -such pay and, consequently, I am not prepared to make a recommendation to you on that matter, although the budget includes an estimate for such costs. I propose that you go ahead and approve the . budget adjustments recognizing that no payment will be made out of the standby pay account until you have approved a specific procedure for doing so. I hope to have a recommenda- tion ready by March 23rd. If you approve the changes, your motion to that effect is required. 4 R4RAWARDEN MLW:ad 3-5-81 i r M E M O R A N D U M TO: City Manager FROM: Finance Director SUBJECT: Revised Budget, Fiscal Year 1980-81 Attached is a revision of the Fiscal Year 1980-81 Budget as of February 2 , 1981. This revision includes all changes approved by City Council on October 27, 1980 , and all revisions approved subsequent to that date through February 2-, 1981. The following addresses specific additions or changes which require City Council approval: REVENUE Page 12 Add account for Bicycle License with an estimated revenue of $300. 00 Page 17 Add account for Revenue Sharing Entitlement Period 12 (October 1, 1980 , through September 30 , 1981) with an estimate for three quarters ' collection of $118 ,983 . Total estimate for Period 12 is $158 , 646 . EXPENDITURES Add minor overtime amounts to those designated departments as follows Page 21 City Manager/City Clerk $200 .00 Page 25 Finance/City Treasurer 100 . 00 Page 28 Recreation 200 . 00 Page 43 Public Works/Engineering 100 .00 Page 55 Public Works/Parks & Zoo 200 . 00 Page 59 Public Works/Building 100 . 00 TOTAL $900 . 00 NOTE: Overtime and standby pay for Public Works/ Streets is addressed by separate memorandum. Page 33 Funds and manning of one officer at $10,143 has been added under the San Luis Obispo County Juvenile Justice Grant Page 39 Increase Account 258 , Fire District Liabilities, Fiscal Year 1979-80, by $7 ,215 to allocate funds for the Fire District' s Fiscal Year 1979-80 State Worker's Compensation premium. Payment of this premium insures that the City of forfeit the final dividend due. The estimated dividend is approximately RESERVE • Page 61 Contingency Reserve and Total General Fund Reserves adjusted to current amounts as of February 2, 1981 . r a Revised Budget, Fiscal Year 1980-81 Page Two • Add new Special Fund Reserve for Period 12 Revenue Sharing. This money will be carried forward to the Fiscal Year 1981- 82 budget and' allocated after the required public hearing process is completed. APPROPRIATION Page 63 Figures in the last two columns for the General Fund, Revenue Sharing, and Total have been adjusted per our increased revenue described above. SUMMARY Page 6-10 All figures have been adjusted to reflect current status of the budget as of February 2, 1981. RALPH H. DOWELL, JR. RHD:ad • • • M E M O R A N D U M TO: Murray Wardent"") FROM: Larry McPherson SUBJECT: Amendment to Service Contract - Atascadero Dial-A-Ride Recommendation: It is requested City Council approve the amendment of the service contract with Community Transit Services , Inc. to lower the vehicle service cost from $15. 57 per hour to $12. 29 per hour. The amendment was requested by this office. Background: Because of increased ridership and use of the backup van to service peak hour passenger demand it is being re- commended that our service contract with Community Transit Systems, Inc. be amended to allow for the additional vehicle service hours being experienced. Exhibits A, B & C show how the increased service hours affect the unit costs of the contract. Basically, most of the costs are fixed and an increase of service hours lowers the Unit cost of the contract. The small increase in total cost for this contract is still well under the budgeted amount of $98 ,532 in our 1980-81 Budget. The new vehicle hour service cost is effective as of January 23, 1981. LAWRENCE McPHERSON LM:vh att: Exhibits A,B&G 3-3-81 EXHIBIT A EXPENDED HOURS JULY ,l, 1980 - JANUARY 23, 1981 Week Ending Service Hours 7-04-80 58.25 7-I1-80 92.75 7-18-80 95.75 7-25-80 96.50 8-01-80 96.75 8-08-80 94.75 8-15-80 95.75 8-22-80 93.25 8-29-80 89.50 9-05-80 81.50 9-12-80 106.75 9-19-80 98.00 9-26-80 105.25 10-03-80 100.75 10-10-80 106.00 10-17-80 103.25 10-24-80 103.75 10-31-80 102.50 11-07-80 108.50 11-14-80 103.00 11-21-80 106.25 11-28-80 82.75 12-05-80 98.00 12-12-80 105.25 12-19-80 114.00 12-26-80 65.25 1-02-81 68.25 1-09-81 108.75 1-16-81 111.75 1-23-81 105.50 TOTAL HOURS 2,898.25 Expended Hours 2,898.25 Hours to Complete Contract 2,664.00* TOTAL HOURS 5,562.25 *24 Hours per Day x 111 Days i CAMMUNITY TRANSIT SERVICES, INC. EXHIBIT B - ORIGINAL COST BREAKDO14N > FISCAL YEAR 1980/81 Management $15,000 Controllers 4,080 Vehicle Operators 19,508 Direct Labor $38,588 Indirect Labor 21,223 Total Labor $59,811 OPERATING COST Travel/Petty Cash $ 400 Physicals 250 Supplies 1,000 • Startup/Carry-over 2,000 $ 3,650 Cost $63,461 Fixed Fee 8,000 Price $71,461 4,590 Service Hours Rate Per Vehicle Service Hours = $15.57 COMMUNITY TRANSIT SERVICES, INC. EXHIBIT C REVISED COST BREAKDOW4 ) FISCAL YEAR 1980/81 Management $15,000 Controllers 4,080 Vehicle Operators 23,640 Direct Labor $42,720 7 Indirect Labor 23,496 $66,216 OPERATING COST .Travel/Petty Cash $ 400 Physicals 250 Supplies 1,000 Startup/Carry-over 2,000 $ 3,650 Cost $69,866 Fee 8,000 Price $77,866 Maximum Authorization $77,866 Expended as of 1-23-81 45,126* Remaining in Contract $32,740 $32,740 t 2,664 Service Hours = $12.29 *2,898.25 Service Hours @ .$15.57 = 45,126 Jul CAMMUNITY TRANSIT SERVICES, INC. I 1 AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT 2 This AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT is made and entered this day of , 3 1981, by and between the CITY OF ATASCADERO, California, hereinafter referred 4 to as "City," and C014MUNITY TRANSIT SERVICES, INC. , hereinafter referred to as 5 ..M&0." 6 W I T N E S S E T H 7 WHEREAS, City and M&O entered into a prior Agreement on the 1st day of 8 July, 1980, for the management and. operations of City's transportation program; 9 and 10 WHEREAS, all parties hereto are desirous of modifying said Agreement; 11 NOW THEREFORE-;- in consideration of the foregoing recital and covenants and 12 agreements of the parties herein set forth, the parties do agree as follows: 13 1. Paragraph 4, amended to read: 14 Maximum Obligation: City agrees to pay M&O in consideration for its • 15 services as described herein. The maximum cost to be paid by City to M&O shall 16 not exceed Seventy Seven Thousand, Eight Hundred, Sixty-Six Dollars ($77,866). 17 2. Paragraph 5, amended to read: 18 Price Formula: City agrees to pay M&O for performance of the services 19 set forth in this Agreement as follows: payment of a fixed hourly rate of i 20 $15.57 per vehicle service hour until January 23, 1981 and $12.29 per vehicle 21 service hour thereafter. 22 3. Exhibit "A," Scope of Work, Paragraph 2, amended to read: 23 Task 1 - SYSTEM OPERATION 24 The system will be operated between the hours of 7:30 a.m. and 6:00 25 p.m. , five (5) days per week, Monday through Friday. Subject to vehicle avail- 26 lability, M&O will provide an average of twenty-four (24) vehicle hours of 27 service on a weekday for a total of one hundred twenty (120) vehicle hours per 1 } 1 typical .week. No service will be provided on Saturdays, Sundays,y , or the 2 following holidays: New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day 3 Thanskgiving Day, or Christmas Day. 4 IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to 5 Agreement to be executed by and through their respective officers thereunto 6 duly authorized on the date written below their signatures. 7 CITY OF ATASCADERO COMMUNITY TRANSIT SERVICES, INC. 8 By: By: 9 Date: Bate: 19 10 Witnessed by: And by: 11 12 Date:. '- Date: 13 Ap roved as o forme 14 2 15 Date: J� 16 17 18 19 i 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ' 27 .I 1 -2- AGENDA - ATASCADER&ITY COUNCIL • Regular Meeting February 23, 1981 7 : 30 p.m. Atascadero Administration Building Call to Order Pledge of Allegiance Invocation Roll Call Public Comment A. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Item A, Consent Calendar, are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion in the form listed below. There will be no separate discussion of these items. If discussion is required, that item will be removed from the Consent Calendar and will be considered separately. Vote may be by roll call . 1. Minutes of the regular meeting of February 10, 1981 (RECOMMEND APPROVAL) 2. Schedule for General Plan amendments (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) - B. HEARINGS, APPEARANCES AND REPORTS 1. Public hearing on Zone Change 2801110 :1, 7805 Navajoa Road, D. R. Barksdale, Ordinance No. 35 - first reading (continued from 2-10-81) 2. Public hearing on Tentative Parcel Map AT 80-73 , 3675 Ardilla • Road, Vera Hand/Loyd King (Stewart) to create a 7 .6 acre parcel and a 2 .5 acre parcel and to legally establish a 1. 24 acre parcel previously created without benefit of a parcel map 3 . Report regarding funding of school crossing guards Mawr Wilkins and Councilman Highland C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Ordinance No. 36 amending Section Map 12-0-34 of the Official Zoning Maps of the City of Atascadero by placing certain property in the R-4-D Zone - second reading 2. Ordinance No. 37 establishing requirements in accordance with the National Flood Insurance Program 3. Beautification Committee consideration D. NEW BUSINESS ' 1 . Resolution No. 4-81 supporting the continuation of the Local Coastal Commission and the termination of the State Coastal Commission after June, 1981 2. HUD 701 grant assistance E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION 1. City Council • 2. City Attorney 3 . City Manager • MINUTES - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting February 10, 1981 7 :30 p.m. Atascadero Administration Building The meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Mayor Wilkins with the Pledge of Allegiance. Don Curtis of St. Williams ' Catholic Church gave the invocation ROLL CALL PRESENT: Councilmen Highland, Mackey, Nelson, Stover and Mayor Wilkins ABSENT: None PUBLIC COMMENT (1) Scott Morlan, representing the Atascadero Jaycees, stated that their organization was dissatisfied with the mainten- ance at the Kiddie Park developed by the Jaycees. The Public Works Department had been asked and had agreed to place 'a sign in the area of the Kiddie Park advising of an age limit for the equipment. This has not been accomplished. Mr. McPherson stated that he would look into the matter. . A. CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Minutes of the regular meeting of January 26, 1981 (RECOMMEND APPROVAL) 2. Treasurer' s Report, 1-1-81 to 1-31-81 (RECOMMEND APPROVAL) 3 . Transfer of funds, $250, from Contingency Reserve to Park and Zoo Dues/Memberships account (RECOMMEND APPROVAL) 4 . Tentative Parcel Map AT 801212:1, 10275 Escondido Road, Alex Kuczynski (Hilliard) (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF P>LANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) 5. Tentative Parcel Map AT 801203 :1, 2100 Traffic Way, Levi 0. Barrett (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOM- MENDATION) 6 . Departmental Review R801215 :1, Variance V801215 :1, 7425 E1 Camino Real, Allen Grimes, Bert Elder, Don Messer (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) 7 . Acceptance of Parcel Map AT 78-212, Cristobal Road, Duane Froning (Stewart) (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) 8 . Acceptance of Parcel Map AT 80-109, 6700 Graves Creek Road Herb LaPrade (Stewart) (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) Mayor Wilkins reviewed all items on the -Consent Calendar. . MOTION: Councilman Nelson moved for acceptance of the Consent Calendar. The motion was seconded by Councilman Mackey and unanimously carried by roll call vote. MINUTES - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting February 10, 1981 Page Two B. HEARINGS, APPEARANCES AND REPORTS 1. Appeal of Planning Commission decision denying an exception to the requirement for improvement to a portion of Vega Avenue, 5650 and 5765 Vega, Don Heath/Kettner Rehbock Mr. Stevens, Planning Director, displayed a map showing the proposed realigned road. The applicant' s request resulted from having built a home into the Vega Avenue right of way. He offered to dedicate the road to the City, but Staff has recommended improvements for the realigned portion before acceptance. The Planning Commission had approved this recommendation and the applicant was appealing that action. Mayor Wilkins called for comments from the applicant. A repre- sentative of Mr. Hilliard' s office and Mr. Jack Stinchfield spoke in _ favor of the appeal. Council did not feel that the City should accept unimproved roads into the City system. MOTION: Councilman Highland moved that Council uphold the Planning Commission's recommendation and deny the appeal. The motio was seconded by Councilman Stover and unanimously carried. 2. Public hearing on Zone Change 2801110 :1, 7805 Navajoa -Road, D. R. Barksdale, Ordinance No. 35 - first reading Mr. Warden advised that there was an address error in the notice that went out for this hearing and asked Council to continue the matter to the next regular meeting. Council concurred. 3 . Public hearing on Zone Change 2801114 :1, 9200 El Bordo Avenue, Bill F. Pippin, Ordinance No. 36 first reading Mr. Stevens reviewed the request which was to allow the rezoning of 2 .39 acres from A-1 to R-4-B-2-D. The Planning Commission had authorized a Conditional Negative Declaration and recommended approval of the zone change with Findings 1-3 as included in the Staff Report. The Planning Commission determined that the rezoning was consistent with the General Plan. MOTION: Councilman Highland moved that Council accept the recom- mendation of the Planning Commission including the findings and Conditional Negative Declaration. The motion was seconded by Councilman Mackey and unanimously carried. MOTION: Councilman Highland moved that Ordinance No. 36 be read by • title only. The motion was seconded by Councilman Mackey and unanimously carried. MINUTES - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting February 10 , 1981 Page Three Mayor Wilkins -read Ordinance No. 36 by title only. MOTION: Councilman Highland moved that this constitute the first reading of Ordinance No. 36 . The motion was seconded by Councilman Mackey and unanimously carried by roll call vote. 4 . Report on road access to 3-F Meadows area, Atascadero Mr. Warden reviewed this matter and noted that Council should be aware of the liability problems involved when the City accepts roads into the City street system. Larry McPherson reviewed the problem areas in 3-F Meadows and the recommendations in his memo. Council generally favored Recommendation #3 in Mr. McPherson' s memo which is to help in the administration of an assessment district to improve access at the instigation of a majority of the benefitting property owners. They also felt that the development standards suggested to mitigate the effects of wildland fires should be adopted. MOTION: Councilman Highland moved that the Council go on record with a policy encouraging assessment and improvement districts for this type of problem; also, that Council generally • approve the concept of the development standards. The motion was seconded by Councilman Mackey and unanimously carried. Howard Marhon felt that Council should assist in maintaining the open status of paper roads and not allow property owners to fence them off. Earl Mi+7-7Pll was not in favor of the City attempting to improve access into the 3-F Meadows area; he felt that there is sufficient access. There was further discussion with Mr. Warden advising against road improvements using general tax monies and which would cure problems essentially privately induced. He suggested the Council to adopt a policy encouraging property owners, through assess- ment district proceedings, to help solve their problem with the City providing all feasible administrative help. 5. City Attorney' s Report No. 10 Mr. Grimes reviewed his report. RECESS 9 :10 P.M. RECONVENED 9 :17 p.m. C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Consideration of School Crossing Guard Agreement • Mr. Warden reviewed the terms of the agreement as proposed by the School District and City staffs as well as the various locations MINUTES - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting Februrary 10 , 1981 Page Four requiring crossing protection. Although the School District staff had agreed to the terms of the agreement, members of the School District had not yet done so. Furthermore, the question of who pays for what was not addressed. A committee of Council members and School Board members will have to get together and make recommenda- tions on that issue. Council felt that there should be a sharing of costs for the program. MOTION: Councilman Mackey moved that the City fund the crossing guard program for the balance of the school year. The motion was seconded by Councilman Nelson and failed on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Mackey and Nelson NOES : Councilmen Highland, Stover, and Mayor Wilkins MOTION: Councilman Highland moved the Council authorize continued funding of the school crossing guards through April 15, 1981' and, during the interim, that the committee from the Council meet with the School Board's committee and attempt to resolve the funding problem. The motion was seconded by Councilman Stover and unanimously carried. Mr. Warden asked if Council approval included dropping the crossing guard at Santa Rosa; Council agreed. 2. Beautification Committee consideration Councilman Mackey stated that the Committee had requested that this item be postponed until the next meeting. D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Award of _contract —Administration Building Renovation, Phase I, Bid No. 81-2 Mr. Warden advised that the low bidder for this project was Tara Construction in the amount of $145, 777; the engineer' s estimate was $150 , 000. Mr. Warden also advised that the City had been able to come up with more reliable figures as to the cost to the City of having to provide Police Department use of the basement instead of using floor space which could be available if the County Library was not on the first floor. MOTION: Councilman Highland moved that the low bid from Tara Construction in the amount of $145, 777 be accepted. The motion was seconded by Councilman Nelson and unanimously carried by roll call vote. • Mr. Warden stated that the cost to replace the boiler is as much as to repair it, about $11,000. He is recommending replacement • MINUTES - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting February 10, 1981 Page Five with the amount taken out of the building renovation funds for this emergency repair. 2. Ordinance No. 37 establishing participation: .in the National Flood Insurance Program - first reading Mr. Warden stated that this Ordinance formalized steps taken some time ago and is a mandated ordinance in order to participate in the Federal low cost flood insurance program. MOTION: Councilman Nelson moved that Ordinance No. 37 be read by title only. The motion was seconded by Councilman Highland and unanimously carried. Mayor Wilkins read Ordinance No. 37 by title only. MOTION: Councilman Highland moved that this constitute the first reading of Ordinance No. 37 . The motion was seconded by Councilman Nelson and unanimously carried by roll call vote. E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION 1. City Council (a) Councilman Mackey stated that she had some tickets for an EOC activity available for purchase by anyone interested. (b) Councilman Highland asked Larry Stevens if there was a schedule for adopting or considering General Plan amendments. Mr. Stevens stated that the Planning Commission would be having bi-annual reviews and that a schedule was being developed along with zoning ordinance changes. (c) Mayor Wilkins stated that the City had hired a new Captain in the Fire Department, Mr. Vern Elliott from Arizona. 2 . City Attorney Mr. Grimes had nothing to report. 3 . City Manager (a) Mr. Warden advised that the City would be receiving $60, 979 as its allocation of Proposition 1, the Parkland Acquisition Act, funds. The City had three years in which to spend the money and these funds might well be used as seed money to secure Federal grant monies if available. • MINUTES - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting February 10, 1981 Page Six (b) Mr. Warden asked Council to set a hearing date to interview applicants for Recreation Director. Council set Saturday, February 28th, starting at 8 : 30 a.m. (c) Mr. Warden discussed the effects. of annexation on the City with regard to contribution to City revenues. Depending upon the type of annexation, it could cost more to provide services than would be generated by property or sales taxes. (d) Mr. Warden asked Council to be thinking about the goals they would like to set for next year ' s budget. The meeting adjourned at 10 :05 p.m. Recorded by: MURRAY L. WARDEN, City Clerk By: Ardith Davis Deputy City Clerk oZ M_E M_O_R A N.^D U M_ TO: CITY MANAGER ,- February 18 , 1981 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: Schedule for general plan amendments On February 17, 1981 the Planning Commission reviewed the attached Staff Report recommending the use of a biannual amendment system. In brief discussion the primary reasons for the Planning Commis- sion recommendation were those noted in the Staff repott. i LAWRENCE EVENS ARRAWARDEN Planning irector nager • /ps CITY OF ATASCADERO aFri rg � Planning Department February 17 , 1981 iris 79 STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: Schedule for generalamendments - BACKGROUND 1. Section 65361 of the Government Code provides as follows: "No mandatory element of a general plan shall be amended more frequently than three times during any calendar year, which amendment or amendments may occur at any time as determined by the legis- lative body. This section shall not apply to the adoption of any element to the general plan. " 2. The General Plan Guidelines state (p. 69) "While the law does not clearly define what consti- tutes an amendment, case law has interpreted this section to allow .each of the three amendments to encompass several different changes (Karlson vs . City of Camarillo (1980) 100 Cal. App. 3d 789) . Many local governments have established regular procedures for periodically amending their gen- eral plans. At three times during the year, they group several proposals for change, analyze their cumulative effects, review them, and act upon the package. " _COMMENTS It is not desirable to allow frequent piecemeal amendments to the general plan although it must remain a dynamic document subject to continuous change as the needs and values of the community dictate. These needs and values must, however, be perceived in the public interest rather than on the desires of an individual owner or group of owners. As a result, hearings for a general plan amendment affecting one property or a similar interest should not proceed merely on the basis of an application having been filed. Some concurrence by the Planning Commission and/or the City Council on the public interest merits of the proposal' seem appropriate before initiating the process . Page Two Re: Schedule for General Amendments February 17 , 1981 The time needed for the amendment process itself can vary from 3-6 months (or longer) depending upon the complexity of - the amendments being undertaken, the environmental review needed, the controversy generated, and appeals, among other factors . In determining a schedule, it is therefore important to allow enough flexibility to accommodate the time variations in order to avoid overlapping into a subsequent calendar year. The available alternatives include annual amendments, biannual amendments, and triannual amendments . Sample schedules for each are as follows : ANNUAL: March 1 - filing deadline July/September - effective date of action BIANNUAL: Cycle 1 October 1 - filing deadline January/March - effective date of action -Cycle 2 March 1 - filing deadline July/September - effective date of action TRIANNUAL: -Cycle 1 October 1 - filing deadline January/March - effective date of action Cycle 2 February 1 filing deadline May/July - effective date of action Cycle 3 June 1 - filing deadline September/November - effective date of action Both the annual and biannual systems allow- for -floating period(s) . These could be used to accommodate periodic review and updating of all elements of the general plan. Page Three Re: Schedule for General Amendments February 17 , 1981 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that a biannual amendment system be instituted with Cycle 1 beginning October 1 and Cycle 2 beginning March 1. (Note: This would allow additional applications to be filed until March 1 at which time all such applications together with any previously filed applications would begin the review period.) _.ACTION TO APPROVE: Move to transmit Staff recommendation to City Council. TO DENY: Direct Staff as deemed appropriate. REPORT PREPARED/APPROVED BY; LAWRENCE STEVENS Planning Director /Ps M E M O R A N D U M : TO: CITY MANAGER February 17 , 1981 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGE Z801110 :1 LOCATION: 7805 Navajoa Road APPLICANT: D.R. Barksdale REQUEST: To allow rezoning of 0 . 63 acres from R-1-B-2-D to R-4 On January 19 , 1981 the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing unanimously adopting Findings 1-2 , authorizing a Condi- tional Negative Declaration, and recommending approval of a zone change as noted in the attached Staff report to R-4-D with the "D" to mean: 1) Development of the property shall be limited to professional offices, single family dwellings, public parks and playgrounds, home occupations, personal services and public utility offices. 2) Provision shall be made to develop a suitable screening buffer which may include landscaping, fencing, and similar between any office development and surrounding residential uses. 3) Access shall be provided to the property only from Morro Road. In brief discussion, it was the consensus of the Planning Commission that the R-4 was most consistent with the Professional Office land use designation as long as the D attachment was used. The applicant, Mr. Barksdale, appeared and stated his agreement with the recommendation. Tentative plans for an office project were presented. No one else appeared on the matter. This matter has been rescheduled from February 10 due to an error in the earing notice, LAWREP CE S VENS Y W EN Planning ' rector Ci Ma ager CITY OF ATASCADERO af--P.lc,� e�n �� 1979Planning Department January 19, 1981 1918 1CC. — [, j STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: Zone Change Z801110 : 1 LOCATION: 7805 Navajoa Road APPLICANT: D.R. Barksdale REQUEST: To rezone property from R-1-B-2-D to R-4 BACKGROUND 1. Existing Zoning: R-l-B-2-D. 2. General Plan: Professional office. 3. Environmental Determination: An initial study environmental description form has been completed for this project. The Planning Director has prepared a Draft Conditional Negative Declaration for the project indicating that no significant adverse effects are likely to occur if certain mitigating measures are incorporated into the project at the time of development. 4 Site Conditions: The site. is roughly 0. 63 acres and is gen- erally level to slightly sloping. Vegetation on the site consists of mostly natural grasses and forbs. The property is bounded on the north and south by established residential uses . A real estate office which fronts on Morro Road and a vacant parcel bounds the property to the east. To the west across Navajoa is a mixed residential area. 5. Project Description The applicant is requesting a zone change from R-1-B-2-D to R-4 to enable the ultimate development of the site with a two story commercial office building. The applicant contends that the R-4 zone requested would conform with. the Professional Office land use designation of the 1980 General Plan as both would allow the use which he plans to develop on the site. The parking lot, some lights and a sign are proposed -� to be located on the lot adjacent to the pro which fron G .�_ on Morro Preliminary development ans have not been su at this point. • Page Two Staff Report: Zone Change 2801110 :1 (Barksdale) January 19 , 1981 STAFF COMMENTS Since it is the applicant' s intent in requesting this rezoning to allow construction of a commercial office facility, evaluation of this request should focus primarily on the consistency of this re- zoning with the intended use specified in the General Plan. Under the present zoning ordinance, a specific professional office zone is not available. Under the present zone, commercial offices are not a permitted use. However, Section 22. 32 . 015 of the R-4 zone under Departmental Review Uses allows : " (6) Professional offices, personal services, and public utility offices. It would seem reasonable to consider the applicant' s request for a rezone to obtain consistency with the General Plan, as it is likely the City would pursue similar zoning in its upcoming City-wide re- zoning program. The General Plan also suggests access to parcels be from an arterial. FINDINGS • 1. The project will not have a significant adverse effect upon the environment and preparation of an Environmental Impact Report is not necessary. However, it will be necessary to introduce certain mitigation measures into the project to minimize potential minor adverse effects. 2. The recommended rezoning is consistent with the Professional Office designation by the 1980 Atascadero General Plan. RECOMMENDATION Based upon the above findings, the Planning Department recommends as follows: 1. Issuance of a Conditional Negative Declaration subject to the following conditions : a. That a drainage plan be submitted for review and approval by the Planning and Public Works department prior to issu- ance of a building permit. 2. Approval of a change of zone from R-1-B-2-D to R-4-D with the "D" to mean: 1. Development of the property shall be limited to professional offices, single family dwellings, public parks and play- grounds, home occupations, personal services and public utility offices. Page Three • Staff Report: Zone Change 2801110 : 1 (Barksdale) January 19 , 1981 2 . Provision shall be made to develop a suitable screening buffer which may include landscaping, fencing, and similar between any office development and surrounding residential uses. 3 . Access shall be provided to the property only from Morro Road. ACTION TO APPROVE: Set motion to adopt a Draft Conditional Negative Declaration and approve a change of zone from R-1-B-2-D to R-4-D subject to staff findings and recommendations . TO DENY: Motion to deny; receive and file. REPORT PREPARED BY: MARY E. BEATIE Associate Planner REPORT APPROVED BY: LATWREN STEVENS PlannifQ,4 Director /ps '4 i .fa .� s O NI V � � V m1iCID� /O Oji VO6 1, ro Im -- ----- - k 11120, QI c I 1 O 1 7 0rnO A W I 914.19'W INCAy 7t7 r*—N 13 20 E Ot"I tqj w W OI N 1 ti W 4 I � r YN EZ _ 6 SANTA7sS - 1 CIS O oo N tel► u.,aull� J.� I /ort $s o6ry 73 37 W Iver 12514 7O /26.86 O` O r -c ao 50.06 N W W N j 62T5�1 131 a I W m W I —N.Y3•uAF B/ V Q,., - ' O NW63.43 4 G s y Sp �XN _ t AVAJOA_ _ _ Qt )09.3 pxltl"� 69..I9.N 2 69.93—, l�oo.r4N 3u70.0 7006?.59 62.59 s . waste. tree 0 N W D O A (n Mc-, r lun 1 's on m r46 77• Joo 4?^ I vz� /X5, . z v O n - -- -- -;_. --= HIGHWAY- NO:--"-- o �� a - o- - - ---_ _ o Dc a D o � ---MORRO_ _ ._ �_AV�_ _ _- cjtT E L.-DCAJ 10um z � i V kGl N ►T`('_ MAP p- 2p16 2� 2 P 3to ( 2 `8 2\ 22 Z4 28 l4 16 24 15 2' rn / a Pzy /8 L 14 v _ /2 /2 26 1 20 27 12 -ZZ4 ^ \�A" •r. %�•,y�,�� 2/ 0 7 _ / 2 I 1 2 � 9 o 2 29 10 _ao 9 �� Q, B .� 8� •'f'7� a ?07!/ 4 , ILI- P251 6 (532) 4 N 35 2 22 a 24 28•. 45-A 23 �o� 29 C� _ Z� a��o12b. 36 X26 36-A 30 / / 37 Z l l • P 5u�, 7 � . C, t 2,t // /0 20 2/ 56 55 � 4 6 7 20 14 /g' 57 54 /8 22 /9 r� 53 17 B C 9 ,�`tz s9:;• /2, Z318 59 52 16 10 �6ups 16 ''?g/. /� 61 15 1 Q oy 2s p 7 c� l 47 � 17 4 l6 62 2 � 6:, �s 63 ZON MAP 18 3 9 ` 2 ,'7728 r V \.�\►1\11 .mss( . 7 S .., 'fir■.\■■\� ���ii�\ g r tae1. ■.V■■ ■■■►.. f �e� ro.■. , n■• nacre �` ■i�wr i I e ; i■■■crnv -u■.r.u.._ ■1■N N■■■L.■■■ p ■NN■NO■■lON■■ a � ■� NN ■.�_ 1 _;Sam=�NNN■N ■ ■ . M. tom""" :�.�----�...�c�a. :■.'e e • . (, r � kms_ ti t m m IN • • i is ORDINANCE NO. 35 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO AMENDING SECTION MAP 12-0-33 OF THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAPS OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO BY PLACING CERTAIN PROPERTY IN THE ' R-4-D ZONE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO ORDAINS as -follows : Section 1. -Council Findings After conducting a public hearing, the City Council finds and determines that: 1. The project will not have a significant adverse effect upon the environment and preparation of an Environmental Impact Report is not necessary. However, it will be necessary to introduce certain mitigation measures into the project to minimize potential minor adverse effects . 2 . The recommended rezoning is consistent with the Profes- sional Office designation by the 1980 Atascadero General Plan. Based upon these findings , a change of zone from R-l-B-2-D to R-4-D with the "D" to mean: 1. Development of the property shall be limited to profes- sional offices, single family dwellings, public parks and playgrounds, home occupations, personal services and public utility offices . 2 . Provision shall be made to develop a suitable screening buffer which may include landscaping, fencing, and similar between any office development and surrounding residential uses. 3 . Access shall be provided to the property only from Morro Road. Section 2 . Zoning Change Map 12-0-33 of the Official Zoning Maps of the City of Atasca- dero on file .in the City Planning Department is hereby amended to reclassify the following described property from R-1-B-2-D to R-4-D: Lot 24 in Block RB of Atascadero Colony, in the City of Atascadero, County of San Luis Obispo, State of California, according to the map recorded October 21, 1914 , in Book 4 , at Page 1 of Maps . Section 3 . Zoning Map • Map 12-0-33 "of the Official Zoning Maps of the City of Atas- cadero on file in the"-City Planning Department is hereby amended as shown on attached Exhibit "A" which is hereby made a part of this ordinance by reference. Section 4 . Publication The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published once within fifteen (15) days after its passage in the Atascadero News, a newspaper of general circulation, printed, published and circulated in the City in accordance with Section 36933 of the Government Code; shall certify the adopting and posting of this ordinance and shall cause this ordinance and this certification together with proof of posting to be entered into the Book of Ordinances of this City. Section 5. Effective Date This ordinance shall go into effect and be in full force and effect at 12 :01 a.m. on 'the 31st day after its passage. The foregoing ordinance was introduced on • and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on- AYES : NOES : ABSENT: ROBERT J. WILKINS , JR. , Mayor ATTEST: MURRAY WARDEN, City Clerk Approved as t form: ALLEN GRIMES, City Attorney • w 23 ' 5 N tibLOr 24 11+ p p R_4-� (AWtip/e Fomi/yy and Professror a/ - desi neck Blk . 58 Oeve/apment h 81k g �, a o x Z 2 3. 4. 2 Aye EXH/8/T ORD11VANCE NO. 35 Z SO///O .I R-1-B-2-D to R-4-D with the "D" to mean: 1 . Development of the property shall be limited to professional offices, single family dwellings , public parks and playgrounds, home occupations, personal services and public utility offices . 2 . Provision shall be made to develop a suitable screening buffer which may include landscaping, fencing, and similar between any office development and surrounding residential uses . 3 . Access shall be provided to the property only from Morro Road. s • C;-z M E M_O_R A N_D U Ms: TO: CITY MANAGER February 17 , 1981 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: Tentative Parcel Map AT 80-73 LOCATION: 3675 Ardilla Road APPLICANT: Vera Hand/Loyd King (Stewart) REQUEST: To create a 7 .6 acre parcel and a 2 .5 acre parcel and to legally establish a 1.24 acre parcel pre- viously created without benefit of a parcel map. On February 2 , Dan Stewart appealed Conditions #5 and #12 as stated in the attached letter. On January 19, 1981 the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing unanimously adopting Findings 1-2 , authorizing a Nega- tive Declaration, and approving Parcel Map AT 80-73 subject to Conditions 1-15 as listed in the attached Staff Report. The Commission had previously considered the matter on January 5 , but continued the hearing to allow further review of the range of alternatives pertaining to lot sizes. There was considerable discussion among the Commission concerning the time at which various lots were created, the current ownerships, possible al- ternatives and the consequences of each, zoning and general plan standards, and the importance of precedent in matters such as this. It was the consensus of the Planning Commission that any new lots and any illegally created lots should conform to the General Plan since there was sufficient land available to do so. Daniel Stewart, applicant' s engineer, appeared on the matter and asked that approval be granted of the parcel map as filed. He indicated that the illegally created 1 .24 acre parcel conformed to standards in effect in 1969 when the lot was created. He stated that the error was procedural and that the applicant had not knowingly violated the law. Bob Lilley also appeared for the applicant. (Note: Commissioner Lilley had disqualified himself from participation because of a conflict of interest as Mrs. Hand' s attorney. ) No one else appeared on the matter. 1-1 lz6�1 rector City/Man EVENS RRAY WA EN Planning ger • a R EIVED FEB 21981 DRIIEL J. STEWART & AS C. ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS Post Office Box 2038 Post Office Box 687 637 Thirteenth Street 4401 EI Camino Real Paso Robles, CA 93446 Atascadero, CA 93423 (805) 238-0700 (805) 466-5717 February 2, 1981 City of Atascadero Planning Department City Hall Atascadero, CA. 93422 Re: Vera Hand Parcel Map AT 80-73 Gentlemen, On behalf of my client, I hereby appeal the decision of the Planning Commission regarding the conditions of approval for the above men- tioned Parcel heap. The conditions that I am appealing and the reasons are as foll-ows: 1. No. 5 - width of private driveway to be twelve (12) feet. I would like to have this item deleted because it appears that the drainage swale will accommodate a railroad car as the most economical type of crossing. 2. No. 12 - Increasing the size of Parcel 3 to 2. 50 acres will present many problems. a. Shape of Parcel 3 b. Shape of Parcel 2 C. Does the owner of Parcel' 3 want to buy another 1.26 acres? d. What will be the price? e. Does the owner of Parcel 1 want to sell another 1. 26 acres? I realize this is a unique situation and with the reasons listed above I anticipate that this project will terminate and the existing situation (2 illegal parcels) will continue. Also, if this project terminated Mrs. Hand can sell Lot 42 and then the two illegal parcels will continue indefinitely. DANIEL J. STEWART & 11SOC., ENGINEERS & SURAORS • Page 2 February 2, 1981 Re: Vera Hand Parcel Map AT 80--73 I hereby request that you accept "alternative #1 listed in the staff report dated January 19, 1981. Respectfully submitted DANIEL J. ST 'fnTART, R.C.E. DJSe�. • CITY Tv OF ATASCADE RO •" C r 1 79 Planning Department January 19 , 1981 1918 G ri R r \ C"E�O` STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: Tentative Parcel Map AT 80-73 LOCATION: 3675 Ardilla Road (Lots 42 , 43, and Ptn. of 44 , Block 17) APPLICANT: Vera Hand (Loyd King) REQUEST: To create a 7.6 acre parcel and a 2 .5 acre parcel and to legally establish a parcel of 1. 24 acres previously created without benefit of a. parcel map. BACKGROUND 1. Existing Zoning: R-A-B-D-1-D 2. General Plan: Suburban Single-Family Residential. 3. Environmental Determination An environmental description form has been completed. The Planning Director has prepared a Draft • Negative Declaration for the project indicating that no adverse environmental effects are likely to occur if the project is im- plemented as proposed. 4 . Site Conditions: The site is gently rolling and ranges in rela- tive elevation from 20 feet near the southwesterly corner up to 120 feet a knoll in the northerly area of the proposed Parcel 1. There are two single family dwellings currently on the site; one is situated near the top of the knoll in proposed Parcel 1, the other is situated generally in the center of proposed Parcel 4 . Access to thesetworesidences is provided via a private driveway from Ardilla Road off the site on Lot 44 and a portion of Lot 43. 5. Project Description: The applicant proposes the tentative Parcel Map to create two new parcels, being Parcel 1 at 7.6 acres and Parcel 2 at 2 . 5 acres and to include two previously created par- cels being Parcel 3 at 1. 24 acres and Parcel 4 at 0 .62 acres. At the time of application, there was some question as to whether or not Parcels 3 and 4 were legally created lots. Review of grant deed information revealed Parcel 3 was created in 1969 without benefit of parcel man as required by law at the time. The original Parcel 4 was created legally, but is included in this application as it takes in another illegally created par- cel measuring approximately 3_8 . 5 feet by 25. 7 feet. Access to Parcels 2-and 3 is proposed via a private riveway easement running along the southwesterly boundary line of these parcels from Ardilla Road. Access to Parcels 1 and 4 would remain from the existing private driveway off the site and to the east on Lot 44 . Staff Report: Parcel Map AT 80-73 (Hand/King) January 19, 1981 Page Two STAFF COMMENTS On Tuesday, November 18, 1980 the Subdivision Review Board met to review this parcel map request. In attendance at the meeting were: Daniel J. Stewart, engineer and applicants ' representative; Marileon Barclay, owner of Parcels 3 and 4; Loyd King, prospective owner of Parcel 2; Lawrence Stevens , Planning Director; Mary E. Beatie, Associate Planner, Larry McPherson, Public Works Director; John Kennaly, Assistant Civil Engineer; Don Sylvia, Fire Department; and Leslie Cannon, Planning Commissioner. Due to the application' s long history and other complexities , the item was continued in order to facilitate more indepth review. To assist in the review the following information was requested: 1) Deeds or other appropriate documentation verifying the estab- lishment of all portions of Lots 42 , 43 , and 44 . On Thursday, December 4 , 1980 the Subdivision Review Board met again to review this parcel map application. The same persons were pre- sent with the exception of Mr. King and Don Sylvia. The following • items were discussed: 1) Parcels 1, 2 , and 4 were determined to be legally created lots. 2) Parcel 3 was not created in compliance with the law in 1969. 3) The small 38 ' X 25 ' rectangular piece included in Parcel 4 was also not created in compliance with the law in 1966 . 4) The northwesterly property line of Parcel 4 may not provide adequate setback. 5) Parcels 3 and 4 are less than the minimum lot size allowed by the 1980 Atascadero General Plan. 6) Recommendation for a Negative Declaration. ANALYSIS Itis particularly difficult to review applications which are at- tempting to correct past illegal actions but which do not comply with current standards. In this case the prior illegal splits occurred in 1966 and 1969 and the best available information indi- cates that the 1968 General Plan designated the area as Suburban with a 1-5 acre lot size range and that the zoning was the same as ..now. As a result, it appears that Parcel 3 could have been allowed based on General Plan and zoning standards if an application had been filed and all legally required steps followed. Neverthe- less, they weren' t and the general plan and zoning standards are � s Staff Report: Parcel Map AT 80-73 (Hand/King) January 19, 1981 Page Three now different. Approval could be construed as condoning past illegal action and encouraging future such action to avoid current standards. On January 5, 1981 the Planning Commission continued the matter to allow additional consideration of the range of alternatives pertain- ing to lot sizes. Those alternatives are as follows: Alternative #1 - Approve the tentative parcel map as submitted. This would allow Parcel 3 (1. 24) acres) to be created at less than todav' s lot size standards ostensibly on that basis that it conformed to the 1969 lot size standards and would allow the 25 ' X 38 ' piece to be added to Parcel 4 . This has the advantage of resolving the illegal splits based on current ownership lines and apparent seller representations lessening the change of litigation between the own- ers; but, it has the disadvantage of setting a dangerous precedent . relative to current General Plan standards . Alternative #2 - Require a revised tentative map increasing the size of Parcel 3 from 1. 24 acres to 2. 5 acres. This would cause the Parcel 3 to conform with General Plan lot size standards while requiring redesign of Parcels l (7. 6 acres) and 2 (2.5 acres) to accommodate this size increase. Advantages associated with this alternative include making the "new" lot (Parcel 3) conform with the General Plan, reducing the potential division of Parcel 1 from three lots to two, and avoiding involvement of adjacent, substand- ard size lots which were created by grant deed in compliance with applicable subdivision ordinances. Disadvantages include possible litigation due to changes in property lines different from current ownership and the possibility that the applicant would not imple- ment a tentative map so approved. Alternative #3 — Require a revised tentative map merging Parcels 3 (1. 24 acres) and 4 (0 . 62 acres) as one parcel of 1. 86 acres. In this alternative, the resulting parcel would still be less than the General Plan standard although it would be closer and less sub- standard. There is the advantage of combining two parcels owned by the party but the disadvantage that Parcel 4 was legally created and Parcel 3 is apparently perceived by its current owner as a separate lot. The loss of a building site may result in litigation and/or no implementation of a tentative map so approved. In addi- tion, the City may be placing itself in a liability situation by merging lots without a specific ordinance to do so. Alternative #4 - Require a revised tentative map merging Parcels 3 (1. 24 acres) and 4 T 0. 62 acres) with adjacent land to form a 2. 5 acre parcel. This is a variation of Alternative #3 and the comments therein are generally pertinent. The adjacent land could be that owned by the owners of Parcels 3 and 4 (not a part of the application at present) or that which is now proposed as Parcel 2 0 • Staff Report: Parcel Map AT 80-73 (Hand/Ring) . January 19 , 1981 Page Four thereby necessitating redesign of Parcels 1 and 2. In pursuing Alternatives 2, 3, or 4, the Commission can approve the tentative with an appropriate condition leaving the redesign detail to Staff or can continue the hearing to a date specific (30-60 days) in order to review the redesign itself. Furthermore, the applicant should be aware that the Planning Department intends to initiate a notice of violation for Parcels 1 (including that portion which is proposed Parcel 2) and 3 pursuant to Government Code Section 66499 . 36 in order to provide constructive notice to any further owner and to encourage quicker resolution of this corrective effort. FINDINGS 1. The application as presented will not have a significant effect upon the environment and the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report is not necessary. 2. Approval of this application as recommended would conform to the applicable zoning regulations and is consistent with the • 1980 Atascadero General Plan. RECOMMENDATION Based upon the above findings, the Planning Department recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration and approval of the tentative Parcel Map AT 80-73 subject to the following conditions: 1. Private sewage disposal systems will be an acceptable method of private sewage disposal , if reports, tests and design are acceptable. All tests, reports, and designs shall conform to methods and guidelines prescribed by the Manual of Septic Tank Practice and other applicable City ordinances. The fol- lowing shall appear as a Note on the Final Map: "Appropriate soils reports including a percolation test, a test to _determine the presence of ground water, and a log of a soil boring to a minimum depth of ten (10) feet shall be submitted to the Atascadero Planning Department prior to the issuance of a building permit on each lot. Where soils reports indicate that conventional soil absorption systems are not acceptable, City approval of plans for an alternative private sewage disposal system, designed by a registered civil engineer, shall be required. Depending • upon the system, more restrictive requirements may be imposed. " • Staff Report: Parcel Map AT 80-73 (Hand/King) • January 19, 1981 Page Five 2. Private sewage disposal systems shall be located minimum distances from creek bank and drainage swales asset forth in local ordinance and/or Regional Water QualityControl Board standards in effect at the time of installation and a Note so stating shall appear on the Final Map. 3. Water shall be obtained from the Atascadero Mutual Water Company and water operable facilities shall exist at the property frontage prior to filing of the Final Map. 4 . Provide plan and profile drawings of proposed driveway for review by Public Works Department prior to Final asap. If average slope exceeds 12%, paved improvement would be a re- quirement of first building permit. Otherwise, an acceptable - all-weather surface would be required similarly. A Note to this effect shall appear on the Final Map. 5. Provision shall be made for improvement of the proposed private driveway easement. The following Note shall appear on the Final Map: "The proposed private driveway shall be improved to a minimum • width of twelve (12) feet with an unobstructed vertical clear- ance of fourteen (14) feet. " 6. The proposed driveway easement shall be of a width acceptable to the Public Works Department and adequate to accommodate slope banks necessary for the construction of said driveway. 7. In conjunction with review of plan and profile for the proposed private driveway, a preliminary drainage plan is also to be submitted. 8. Prior to recordation of the Final Map, the applicants shall, in a form acceptable to the City, agree to participate in an assessment district or similar cooperative effort at an undeter- mined future date to provide road improvements in conformance with City standards on Ardilla Road. Said agreement shall be noted on the Final Map and/or otherwise recorded and said road improvements shall be provided within three years from the date of recordation of the Final Map. An extension of time to a longer term may be granted by the Planning Commission and/or City Council. Furthermore, said road improvement condition does not bind the City to accept, participate in, or fund any such effort. It shall be the responsibility of the applicants to take the initiative in compliance herewith. • 9. Effort shall be made to minimize grading that would be disrup- tive to the natural topography and removal of existing, mature trees. The following shall appear as a note on the Final Map: Staff Report: Parcel Map AT 80-73 (Hand/King) January 19 , 1981 Page Six "No trees shall be" removed without compliance with applicable City ordinances. No grading shall commence without an appro- priate permit and compliance with applicable City ordinances. " 10. Drainage swales to be shown on final map. 11. The northwesterly bondary line of Parcel 4 shall be adjusted if necessary to ensure required side yard setbacks . 12. Parcel 3 shall be increased to a minimum size of 23 acres with Parcel 1 and Parcel 2 redesigned accordingly. Lot design shall be subject to the review and approval of the Planning Director and may, at his discretion, be referred to the Planning Commis- sion for review and approval. 13. A Final Parcel Map in compliance with all conditions set forth herein shall be submitted for review and approval in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City Lot Division Ordi- nance prior to recordation 14 . a. Monuments shall be at all new property corners • created and a registered civil engineer or licensed land surveyor shall submit a letter certifying that the monuments have been set prior to recordation of the Final Parcel Map. b. A litigation title guarantee shall be submitted for =vI...; in conjunction with the processing of the Final Parcel Map. 14. Approval of this Tentative Parcel Map shall expire one year from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted pursuant to a written request prior to the expi- ration date. ACTION The Planning Commission should by motion direct staff as deemed appropriate. TO APPROVE: Motion to adopt findings and set conditions. TO DENY: Motion setting findings for denial. REPORT PREPARED BY: MARY E. BEATIE, Associate Planner REPORT APPROVED BY: -Lm�nr LAWRENCE VENS, Planning Director /Ps RE TJ _ � � t�gyp,• `�� �'�,'® ''�o?�!, `� " I ® �® S \`�'�. fir..• S WWI: ; ,k \ • �� ,�� �` �► • o•� iWN , relj�M." -� I'm IVIN Ma A.99 WA 14 / 1 \ / 15/ g 16 14 29 � ,' 17 Par. 1 ' 19 27 20 26 25 ' i /� 16 i21 i i � 1489 / ci 44 43 42 22 — . 25-A 2 (o7-4.5 � \ X10CD a 12 QJ \ �, //�/ , i + ;,c e 1 cc, — 16 --g r)) G F GO-73-7-70 ,t 7 20A)1nJ CT I"AP 6 L--4 ` qrk Vim.Q Q0 4 fed • �QVQj q �5 ... 3 �� t hlid a' PRS� � e s N 4 TENT/-TIVE: A/4 - - So-7 3 ORDINANCE NO. 36 aAN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO AMENDING SECTION MAP 12-0-34 OF THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAPS OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO BY PLACING CERTAIN PROPERTY IN THE R-4-D ZONE. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO ORDAINS as follows: Section 1. Council Findings . After conducting a public hearing, the City Council finds and determines that: 1. The project will not have a significant adverse effect upon the environment and the preparation of an Environ- mental Impact Report is not necessary. However, it will be necessary to introduce certain mitigation measures into the project to minimize potential adverse effects. 2. The recommended "D" with the proposed rezoning will pro- vide an opportunity to ensure that the resulting develop- ment will be an attractive and compatible neighbor to adjacent properties and public roads. . 3. The recommended rezoning is consistent with the High Density Multiple-Family designation by the 1980 Atascadero General Plan. Based upon these findings, a change of zone from A-1 to R-4-D with the "D" to mean: "l. Departmental Review is also required for multiple family residential uses totaling less than ten units per building site. 2. Design review of development proposals with particular attention given to insuring an attractive apppearance from El Bordo and adjacent properties by means of archi- tectural design, landscaping, building and use setbacks; and signing and lighting limitations. 3. That the minimum lot size for creation of new parcels shall be one-half (1/2) acre 4. That building height shall be limited to two stories . 5. That, in the event the site is developed with mobile homes, the maximum allowable density shall be eleven (11) units per acre as provided in the General Plan.; i 6. That the density shall be calculated on a basis of 36 people per acre or any combination of the following maxima which when multiplied by standard occupancy factors, does not exceed 36 individual residents per acre 18 one bedroom apartments per acre 12 two bedroom apartments per acre 9 three bedroom apartments per acre 7 four bedroom apartments per acre Occupancy Factors ' Studio 1 person One bedroom 2 persons Two bedrooms 3 persons Three bedrooms 4 persons Four or more bedrooms 5 persons" Section 2 Zoning Change. Map 12-0-34 of the Official Zoning Maps of the City of Atas- cadero on file in the City Planning Department is hereby amended to reclassifv the following described property from A-1 to R-4-D: Parcel 1 as shown on Parcel Map CO 72-344 in the City of Atascadero, County of San Luis Obispo, State of California, as per map recorded February 16 , 1973 in Book 10, Page 69 of Parcel Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said County. Section 3. Zoning Map Map 12-0-34 of the Official Zining Maps of the City of- Atas- cadero on file in the City Planning Department is hereby amended as shown on attached Exhibit "A" which is hereby made a part of this ordinance by reference. Section 4 Publication The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published once within fifteen (15) days after its passage in the Atascadero News, a newspaper of general circulation, printed, published and circulated in the City in accordance with Section 36933 of the Government Code; shall certify the adopting and posting of this ordinance and shall cause this ordinance and this certification together with proof of posting to be entered into the Book of Ordinances of this City. 0 0 Section 5. Effective Date This ordinance shall go into effect and be in full force and effect at 12 :01 a.m. on the 31st day after its passage. The foregoing ordinance was introduced on and adopted at a regular meeting_of the City Council held on AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ROBERT J. WILKINS, Jr. , Mayor ATTEST: MURRAY L. WARDEN, ' ty Clerk Approved as to for 4 ALLEN CRIMES, City Attorney U11 LJO34 A.D s Ac/diPion No. 1 VC-) P ' Lot 35 0 3 0� R-4-D 1 - 100 pG <Mu/tip/e Fomi/yy ono' F� � Q P�ofessiono/- Designed i X25 _ De ve/oprrelif) V 01 2 1 � ExHlo 7- 'A ORp/NA/VCE N0. 36 Z 801114 0� L A-1 to R-4-D with the "D" to mean: 1. "Departmental Review is also required for multiple family residential uses totaling less than ten units per building - site. . 2. Design review of development proposalswith particular - attention given to insuring an attractive appearance from E1 Sordo and adjacent properties by means of architectural - design, landscaping, building and use setbacks; and sign- ing and lighting limitations." 3. That the minimum lot size for creation of new parcels shall be one-half (1/2) acre. 4. That building height shall be limitedto two stories. -. 5. That, in the event the site is developed with mobile homes, the maximum allowable density shall be eleven (11) units per acre as provided in the General Plan. 6. That the density shall be calculated on a basis of 36 people per acre or any combination of the following maxima which when multiplied by standard occupancy factors, does not exceed 36 individual residents per acre: 18 one bedroom apartments;per acre 12 two bedroom apartmentsper acre. 9.three hedroom apartments peracre 7 four bedroom apartments per acre Occupancy Factors Studio 1 person Onebedroom 2 persons. Two bedrooms 3 persons. .Three bedrooms. 4 persons - Four or more bedrooms 5 persons ! ! oZ c ORDINANCE NO. 37 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO ESTABLISHING REQUIREMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM WHEREAS, the Council adopted Resolution No. 2-81 approving participation in the National Flood Insurance Program; and WHEREAS, pursuant to this resolution certain regulations are necessary for effective enforcement of the National Flood Insurance Program. NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Atascadero does ordain as follows: Section 1. The City Engineer shall be the responsible person and shall enforce Section 1910 . 3 (b) of the Federal Insurance Administration regulations as Section 1910 . 3 (b) appeared in the Federal Register, Volume 41, No. 207 , Tuesday, October 26 , 1976 . Section 2 . The Flood Hazard Boundary Map issued by the Federal Insurance Administration for this community, dated September 16, 1980, with Panel Numbers 060700 0001-002, and any officially published revisions to this map, is adopted as the official map for the enforcement of this Ordinance. Zone A on this map delineates the area within which the requirements of this ordinance will be enforced. Section 3 . The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published once within fifteen (15) days after its passage in the Atascaderc �;����, a newspaper of general circulation printed, pub- lished and circulated in the City in accordance with Section 36933 of the Government Code; shall certify the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause this ordinance and this certification to be entered into the Book of Ordinances of this City. Section 4 . This ordinance shall go into effect and be in full force and effect at 12 :01 a.m. on the 31st day after its passage. The foregoing ordinance was introduced on February 10, 1981 and adopted at a regular meeting of the Council held on AYES : NOES : ABSENT: ROBERT J. WILKIN , JR. , Mayor ATTEST: . APPROVED AS TO F RM: MURRAY L. WARDEN, City Clerk ALLEN GRIMES, City Attorney l M_E M_0_R_A N_D_U M_ • TO: Cit Counci Y 1 FROM: City Manager SUBJECT: Resolution supporting. Local Coastal' Commissions The attached resolution has, in essence, been suggested by the Cities of Grover City and Paso Robles for considera- tion by the State Legislature and other interested agencies in restructuring the State and Regional Coastal Commissions. While the City of Atascadero is not affected directly by the Coastal Act, the actions of the Commission have an impact on Atascadero citizens and, since the Coastal Act was a State-wide initiative, it is of concern to all citizens of the State. It is proposed that the Regional Commissions remain in operation after the termination date specified by law rather than continuing the State Commission. The proposal is based on a belief that Regional Commissions, being regional and therefore closer to the coastal activities, are better able to evaluate particular local situations and are more accessible to local interested parties than is the more remote State Commission. Local accessibility by interested citizens is easier than if the only hearing agency is the State Commission. It should be noted that one or the other, i.e. , State or Regional Commission, will cease operations. For these reasons, the Cities of Grover City and Paso Robles have adopted a resolution similar to the one attached. They have requested that all cities in the County adopt similar resolutions for consideration by the League of California Cities at its Annual Convention and by the State Legislature. If you concur, passage of the attached is appropriate. "RRAL. DEN MLW:ad 2-18-81 • • RESOLUTION NO. 4-81 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO SUPPORTING THE • CONTINUATION OF THE LOCAL COASTAL COMMISSION AND THE TERMINATION OF THE STATE COASTAL COMMISSION AFTER JUNE, 1981 WHEREAS, the South `Central Coast Commission, as presently constituted, deals with the mandates of 'the Coastal Preservation Act for San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara and Ventura Counties; and WHEREAS, being a local commission, the needs, resource capacities and constraints of the area are well known and the needs of the public of the State of California to Access, Housing, etc. , under the Coastal Act are readily addressed; and WHEREAS, State Commission members may reside 1100 miles apart; and WHEREAS, the State Commission may perceive needs for coastal cities which are not the real needs considering the diversity of city types in the coastal zone; and WHEREAS, local and visitor needs are well known to local people; and • WHEREAS, since service on the State Commission requires a excessive amount of one's time, opportunities for service on this Commission is restricted to those who have the time to serve, not necessarily to those who should or are the best qualified to serve; and WHEREAS, continuation of the State Coastal Commission requires the expenditure of a great deal of travel time in order to attend remote State Commission hearings; and WHEREAS, this remoteness effectively precludes attendance by many interested parties at State Commission hearings . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Atascadero supports the termination of the State Commission and the continuance of the Regional Commissions. IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk send a copy of this resolution to the cities' representatives of the California Legislature, the South Central Coast Commission, the San Luis Obispo County Board of Supervisors and the six cities in San Luis Obispo County. Resolution No. 4-81 Page Two On motion by Councilman and seconded by Councilman , the foregoing proposed resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote: AYES NOES: ABSENT: ADOPTED: ROBERT J. WILKINS, JR. , Mayor ATTEST: MURRAY L. WARDEN, City Clerk • APPROVED AS TO OR22: f ALLEN GRIMES, City Attorney • M_E M O_R A N_D_U M_ • TO: City Council FROM: City Manager SUBJECT: HUD 701 grant assistance The Department of Housing and Community Development has established February 27 , 1981, as the deadline for sub- mission of preliminary applications for Comprehensive Planning Assistance (HUD 701) funds for fiscal year 1981-82. We are not sure that the City of Atascadero will be able to qualify for these funds, but feel that we should apply so = that we might receive some assistance in funding revisions to the General Plan and its mandated elements. In order for us to submit a preliminary application, • it will be necessary for the Council, by motion, to approve and authorize City Staff to submit an application. It is also requested that you authorize the City Manager to sign the necessary documents. M RAY L. WARDEN MLW:ad 2-17-81 •