HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 08/27/1979 0 w
• AGENDA - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting
August 27 , 1979 7: 30 p.m.
Administration Building
Call to Order
Pledge of Allegiance
Invocation
Roll Call
Public Coffment
A. CONSENT CALENDAR
1. Minutes of the regular meeting of August 13, 1979
(RECOMMEND APPROVAL)
2. Treasurer' s Report, 7-16-79 through 5-20-79
(RECOMMEND APPROVAL)
B. HEARINGS, APPEARANCES AND REPORTS
1 . Public hearing on applicatio7, of Robert W. Walton for a
Conditional Use Permit to allow an 8-unit apartment project
in a R-2-B-2-D zone, located on the east side of Capistrano
Avenue, north cf Highway 41, Atascadero - contined from
7-30-79
2. Public hearing on application of Robert F. Stuhr for a
Conditional Use Permit to allow the conversion of an
existing 44-unit elderly housing project to general apart-
ment use located at 5525 Capistrano Avenue on the south-
east corner of Capistrano Avenue and Country Club Drive,
Atascadero continued from 7-30-79
3. Public hearing on the application of Stinchfield and Summers
(6790611: 2) for a Conditional Use Permit to allow signing
in excess of sixty (60) square feet in a C-1 zone, 4401
El Canino Real, City of Atascadero
4. Public hearing on application of Charles Kamm for 'a Tentative
Tract Map to allow a 16-unit condominium conversion sub-
division on a 1. 07 acre site, located on Capistrano Avenue,
north of Santa Ysabel, City of Atascadero - Recommend item
be continued to 9-24-79
5. Public hearing on application of Donald M. Rauch for a
Tentative Tract Map to allow a subdivision of a . 49 acre
site into a 5-unit condominium project, located on the west
side of Santa Ysabel Avenue just south of Robles Avenue,
City of Atascadero Recommend item be tabled
C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Legal advertising policy - continued from 8-13-79
D. NEW BUSINESS
1. Consideration of Lot Line Adjustment of a portion of Lot 2
. �.
.zabsu-ew A-4TO •£
� AauJO44V A4TO 'Z
y v � TTounoO A4TO •T
NOILLOV /QNV NOIsVNiWx9saQ 7VfIGIAICINI •9
gabpnq 08-6L6T o.zap oss�� �o � .D bu�pzs�a� uoTssn6sTQ •L
ul94SAS qu9ui9.aT49H saaAoTdiva oTTgnd Jo uoT4e.a9pTSuoO •9
sAspTToq aaAOTduia Jo uOT4s29pTsuOD •S
m94sAs ssa.zpps OTTgnd buTspuo.znd 90 uoTgPl9pTsuOD •D,
squauxgsanui gaTbpa/squauigsanul anoQ
- o.zapsossW 90 A4TO 'AuOTOO oaapaoSPW 'L NOOTg 'S I V
sgoQ go suoT-.aod go 4uaur4sn[pV auTZ -.oj go uoT-.-e.aapTsuOO •£
s ouAQ D/z qua.z3/Aaumu
Oa9Pgosa4V 90 A4TD 'AuOTOO oa9pPoss4V 'L NOOTU 'VET I £T
40q Jo SuoTgaod go quauigsnCpv auTZ qoq 90 uOTgs.zepTsuOO 'Z
4uauu OTanaQ TPanH - o.zapsosPW 90 i�4TO '98T-VL OO
40 Z T93JPd go uoT420d s puV 'xzsd aouapisag aJTZ 'S pus
( -4=0) SSSN.I:SIlq MaN 'Q
OAA, ablea
6L6T 'LZ 4snbnv buT499W JPTnbag
gIONnOO ALIO OUHU 'OSVIV - VGNRDV
MINUTES - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting
August 13, 1979 7 : 30 p.m.
Atascadero Administration Building
The meeting was called to order by Mayor 'Wilkins with the
Pledge of Allegiance. The invocation was given by John Cole of the
Atascadero Bible Church.
POLL CALL
PRESENT: Councilmen Highland, Mackey, Nelson, Stover, and Mayor
Wilkins
ABSENT: None
PUBLIC COMMENT
There was no public co -hent.
A. CONSENT CALENDAR
1. Minutes of the regular meeting of July 23, 1979 (RECOMMEND
• APPROVAL)
2. Minutes of the adjourned regular meeting of July 30, 1979
(RECOMMEND APPROVAL)
3. Correspondence (RECOMMEND ITEMS BE RECEIVED AND FILED)
Mayor Wilkins asked if Council members had any comments con-
cerning the Consent Calendar; if not, all items can be approved by
one motion. Under Correspondence was a letter from the State Board
of Equalization notifying the City that they had received the agree-
ment concerning administration of the local sales and use tax; and
a letter from Lt. Pledger of the Califo-"nia Highway Patrol advising
that his office will provide traffic safety services for Atascadero
until July 1, 1980.
I OTION— Counc^' lman Highland moved for approval of the Consent
Calendar. The motion was seconded by Councilman
Mackey and unanimously carried.
B. HEARINGS, APPEARANCES AND REPORTS
1. Appearance of Elliott O. Stephenson concerning purchasing
property near Atascadero Lake Park
Mr. Stephenson read his letter of August 6, 1979, to Council
which encouraged the Council to purchase from the County thirteen
lots facing Lake View Drive on the easterly shore of Atascadero
Lake. He felt that the County would soon put the lots on the market
• and the City should purchase them for recreation and conservation
purposes.
MINUTES - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting August 13 , 1979
Page Two
Mayor Wilkins advised that the City Manager would look into
the matter and keep the Council advised regarding the status of
these properties.
2. Report from City Attorney concerning requirements for
adoption of a General Plan and zoning consistency for
newly incorporated city
Mr. Grimes stated that he had misinformed the Council regarding
their adoption of the General Plan through adoption of all County
ordinances. After reviewing the applicable sections of the Govern-
went Code and discussing the matter with the County Counsel, he is
now of the opinion that the City does not have an adopted General
Plan. The City should begin the adoption process by instructing the
Planning Commission to hold public herrings on the General Plan
this instruction should also inolude that the Council believes the
General Plan adopted by the County in December of 1978 is appropriate
for the City of Atascadero.
Councilman Highland noted that Government Code Section 65302. 5B
• states that the Council may determine that individual projects on a
case by case basis do or do not conform with a general plan proposal
ageing considered for future adoption.
MOTION: Councilman Highland moved that the Planning Commission
be instructed to prepare an Atascadero General Plan for
adoption as its first order of business and that they
follow the Atascadero General Plan as adopted by the
Board of Supervisors in December of 1978. The motion
was seconded by Councilman Nelson and unanimously carried.
3 „ Report from City Attorney on Ordinance No. 8 amending
Ordinance No. '1 relating to the time and place of regular
meetings.
In response to a question by Councilman Nelson concerning the
proposed ordinance, Mr. Grimes advised that he has researched the
Natter and came to the conclusion that the original ordinance as
adopted is satisfactory and requested that the proposed Ordinance
No. 8 be dropped from the agenda.
4. Report from City Manager on publishing costs for legal
advertisements
Mr. [warden reviewed his memo regarding the costs of publication.
A letter-sized typed page costs between $15. 00 to $20. 00 to publish.
• He reviewed the sections of the Government Code which govern legal
publications and alternatives to publishing. During the first year,
Council can have the ordinances posted in three designated places.
• MINUTES - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting August 13, 1979
Page Three
After that, they must be published, either in whole or in summary.
Councilman Mackey asked that the matter be tabled until the
next meeting so that Council has a chance to study the matter
further and perhaps _get an idea from the public as to whether or
not they read legal ads.
MOTION: Councilman Mackey moved that this matter be tabled until
the next meeting. The motion was seconded by Council-
man Nelson and unanimously carried.
Mr . Warden asked Council to be thinking of three places in
which to post the ordinances if they decided to post instead of
publish.
C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Resolution No. 8-79 creating a temporary towaway zone and
parade route for Colony Days celebration
Mayor Wilkins stated that this resolution set out the designated
areas for a parade route and concession area for the October 20th
celebration.
MENTION: Councilman Highland moved for the adoption of Resolution
No. 8-79. The motion was seconded by Councilman Mackey.
Mayor Wilkins read Resolution No. 8-79 by title only.
The motion was unanimously carried.
2. Consideration of establishing City Council Committees
Councilman Mackey stated that many people had expressed an
_nterest in serving on committees and she had given Council a list
of proposed conur...ittees which should be established soon. Among the
caomznittees recommended were Beautification which would include
Horticulture and Litter; Administration Building Committee to begin
looking into updating the building and the possibility of obtaining
grants; Public Safety Committees Park and Recreation Committee, etc.
Council members discussed the concept of committees with some
members feeli4ng that the City should wait until some of the City
departments are established before committees get started. Council-
man Highland felt that the committee needed definite directives from
the Council.
Council decided that those interested in serving on committees
• MINUTES - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting August 13, 1979
Page Four
should write to the City stating their areas of interest and expertise.
3. Resolution No. 9-79 formalizing the appointment of City
Clerk
Mayor Wilkins read Resolution No. 9-79 by title only. This
resolution appointed Murray L. Warden as City Clerk.
MOTION: Councilman Highland moved for the adoption of Resolution
No. 9-79. The motion was seconded by Councilman Nelson
and unanimously carried.
4 . Resolution No. 10-79 appointing a City Treasurer
Mayor Wilkins read this resolution by title only which appointed
Ralph H. Dowell, Jr. , City Treasurer and relieved Murray Warden
from the duties as Interim City Treasurer.
MOTION: Councilman Stover moved for the adoption of Resolution
No. 10-79. The motion was seconded by Councilman Highland
and carried with Councilman Mackey voting no.
5. Consideration of ads for Planning Director and Chief of
Police
Mr. Warden discussed these ads and asked if Council had any
ctaanges. There were none, however, Councilman Nelson asked what
Mr. Warden ' s salary recommendation was for Chief of Police. Mr. Warden
felt that the $20,500 salary suggested in the LAFCO budget was too
low in comparing the ads running in Western Cities Magazine for Police
Chiefs and in comparision with local. salaries. He suggested at least
starting at $22,500.
MOTION: Councilman Highland moved that a Chief of Police position
be advertised at a salary of $22,500 per year. The
motion was seconded by Councilman Nelson and unanimously
carried.
There was discussion about an interview date and Mayor Wilkins
suggested ghat Council set aside October 27th as a tentative date to
interview applicants for Planning Director.
Mar. Warden stated that during this advertising period, the process
to hire Staff people: for these departments should begin so that when
a. Planning :Director is hired, he can participate in the interview and
selection process for his departmental staff.
•
MINUTES - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting August 13 , 1979
Page Five
D. NEW BUSINESS
1. Consideration of Environmental Determination- Ruda Parcel
Map ED 78-300 (CO 78-262)
Ellen Rognas from the County Environmental Coordinator' s office
was present to answer questions regarding this project. She stated
that Staff had recommended that the applicant be required to pre-
pare a Focused Environmental Impact Report which is less than a
full EIR and focuses only on those issues considered by Staff to
be significant enough to warrant mitigating measures. In this case,
soil erosion, sliding, access, loss of vegetative .resources and
wildlife habitat, presence of historical or archeological sites, and
cumulative impact.
Robert Hilliard, surveyor representing the applicant Mr. Ruda,
disagreed with the Staff' s recommendation. He stated that the pro-
perty had just experienced two very wet winters and, if soil erosion
was a problem, it would have presented itself at that time. Don
Sylvia, County Fire District, was concerned about access and fire
hazards in the area.
There was considerable discussion by Council members .regarding
this project. Mr. Ruda stated that he had discussed this matter
with the Planning Staff and explained to them that a geologist had
inspected the soil in the area and determined that soil erosion would
not be a problem. Ellen Rognas had suggested that the geologist
write a letter to this effect which could be included in the report.
He asked if the letter would eliminate the need for an EIR focused
only on the soil erosion problem. Councilman Highland still felt
that a focused EIR was necessary because of the access problems and
fire hazard.
MOTION: Councilman Nelson moved that Council adopt Finding #2
on the Staff determination and that the EIR focus its
report on the areas of soil erosion, sliding, access,
loss of vegetative resources and wildlife habitat,
presence of historical or archeological sites, and cumu-
lative impact. The motion was seconded by Councilman
Highland and unanimously carried.
2. Consideration of Environmental Determination - Messer
Parcel Map ED 78-302 (CO 78-264)
Mayor Wilkins stated that this project was also recommended for
a Focused EIR. Councilman Highland stated that he had some problems
• with the access to this parcel which was also one of the recommenda-
tions the EIR was to consider.
MINUTES - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting August 13, 1979
Page Six
MOTION: Councilman Highland moved that Finding #2 of the Staff
determination be adopted with the EIR to be focused on
access and circulation, potential significant effects
due to major topographic alteration, soil erosion, and
potential alternative lot configuration in order to
mitigate the impacts mentioned in the Staff report.
The motion was seconded by Counc-Aman Nelson and unani-
mously carried.
3. Consideration of Environmental Determination Watson
Parcel Map ED 78-303 (Tract 770)
Ellen Rognas stated that this project was recommended for a
Conditional Negative Declaration which means that if the applicant
complies with the conditions set by Staff, no EIR is required.
MOTION: Councilman Highland moved that the Council accept Finding
43 of the Staff determination on the condition that the
applicant provide safe and adequate access to Parcel C
and that letters be obtained from Atascadero Mutual
Water Company and appropriate community sewer district
and submitted to the City of Atascadero and the County
Health Department stating that they are willing and able
to serve the proposed parcels. The motion was seconded
by Councilman Mackey and unanimously carried.
4 . Consideration of proposed lot division of Lot 24 of
Biock 46, Atascadero Colony - Heinemann, San Luis Engineering
John Ho-4schroer of the County Subdivision Review Section reviewed
this project which proposes to subdivide a 13. 1 acre site into three
parcels of 4, 4, and 5. 5 acres each. The County Staff recommends
approval with the conditions set forth in their report. Mr. Walker,
representing the applicant, was present and stated that they intend
to comply with the recommendations as set forth.
MOTION: Councilman Nelson moved that the Council adopt the findings
and recommendations of the Subdivision Review Board; find
that the project is consistent with the General Plans
adapt the Environmental Coordinators recommendations and
certify the EIR as being adequate. The motion was seconded
by Councilman Mackey and unanimously carried.
5. Resolution No. 11-79 accepting a five foot widening of
Portola Road into the City road system.
• Mr. Warden explained that this dedication is required of new
developments in order to widen the road in accordance with the General
Plan requirements. Mr. Grimes suggested that an additional section
MINUTES - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting August 13 , 1979
Page Seven
be added to the resolution to state that Council approves the map
and authorizes the Mayor and City Clerk to sign it. Council accepted
the amendment.
MOTION: Councilman Highland moved that Council adopt Resolution
No. 11-79 as amended. The motion was seconded by Council-
man Mackey and unanimously carried.
6. Consideration of Ordinance No. 10 establishing a'
Municipal Code,. providing for its up-keep and maintenance,
and providing penalties for violations
Mr. Grimes stated that this would provide a basis for organizing
the City' s ordinances which will maks: them easier to find and keep
them in an organized form.
MOTION: Councilman Highland moved that Ordinance No. 10 be read
by title only. The motion was seconded by Councilman
Nelson and unanimously carried.
• Mayor Wilkins read Ordinance No. 10 by title only.
MOTION: Councilman Highland moved for the adoption of Ordinance
No. 10. The motion was seconded by Councilman Stover
and unanimously carried by roll call vote.
7. Consideration of entering into the Joint Powers Agreement
for San. Luis Obispo County Area Council of Governments
Mr. Warden explained the functions of the Council of Governments
and, in particular, with regard to the distribution of SB 325 monies.
He suggested that the Council agree to become a member of this body
and make a motion authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the
agreement.
MOTION: Councilman Nelson moved that the Mayor and City Clerk
be authorized to sign the Joint Powers Agreement for
the San. Luis Obispo County Area Council of Governments.
The motion was seconded by Councilman Highland and
unanimously carried.
S. Consideration of Resolution No. 12-79 authorizing invest-
ment of City monies in the State Administered Local
Agency Investment Fund
MOTION: Councilman Highland moved for the adoption of Resolution
• No. 12-79. The motion was seconded by Councilman Nelson
and unanimously carried.
MINUTES - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting August 13, 1979
Page Eight
E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION
1. City Council
(a) Councilman Mackey stated that she had a request from
Kate Johns to talk to Council and she would like her
to have this opportunity to speak. Mrs. Johns stated that she is
the owner and operator of Atascadero Taxi. She stated that with Dial-
A-Ride coming into the City and increased costs in gasoline and , insur-
ance, she is finding it difficult to be able to operate financially.
She asked Council if they felt a taxi was needed in the City and if
they could help her. Mayor Wilkins stated that, financially, the
City was unable to help her. Mrs. Johns maintained that with Dial
-
A-Ride, she would be unable to make a profit and could not make pay-
ments which were due in the near future. Councilman Highland said
that Dial-A-Ride is not in the City yet and may not be for several
months.
There was discussion on this matter with no Council action taken.
(b) Ken Harthoorn stated that the Council had passed
Ordinance No. 10 which states that it will be posted
in three places as opposed to publishing; he asked Council which they
had intended. Mr. Grimes stated that he had anticipated the Council
deciding to post and that they could determine, at this time, which
way they wished to go for this particular ordinance. Council agreed
that this ordinance should be posted.
MOTION: Councilman Highland moved that this ordinance be posted
at the Post Office, Library, and City Clerk's office.
The motion was seconded by Councilman Nelson and unani-
mously carried.
(c) Mayor Wilkins asked Mr. Warden about purchasing a
PA system to replace the one the City has been borrowing.
Mr. Warden stated that he has looked at several systems and hopes
to be coming back with some recommendations to Council in the near
future.
2. City Attorney
(a) Mr. Grimes addressed himself to the situation between
the City of Atascadero and the County of San Luis
Obispo with regard to the County continuing to provide services for
the rest of the fiscal year. Mr. Grimes believes that the Government
Code requires the County to do so, but the County Counsel 's opinion
is that the County need only provide services for a 120-day period.
i
MINUTES - ATASCA®ERO CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting August 13, 1979
Page Nine
He recommended that the City Manager and City Attorney be directed
to write to the Board of Supervisors to find out if it, the County,
is going to comply with the State law and furnish the City with
free services and, if they say "no" , then the City should turn to
the courts for relief. He stated it is impossible to carry on City
business and make plans not knowing if the City is going to be cut
off on January 2nd or not. He thought the cost of going to court
might be in the neighborhood of $1,000 to $1,500.
There was discussion on this matter with Council agreeing that
it could not operate efficiently unless it knows for sure what is
going to happen.
MOTION: Councilman Highland moved that the Council instruct the
City Manager and City Attorney to pursue this as aggres-
sively as necessary to whatever point necessary to get
it settled.. The motion was seconded by Councilman Nelson
and unanimously carried.
3. City Manager
(a) Mr. Warren stated that the Council needs to appoint
a voting delegate to the League of California Cities
Annual Convention in September. Mayor Wilkins is the only Council
member going to the convention, so he was appointed.
(b) Mr. Warden advised that, according to the County Code
whish the City has adopted, September 10th is Admission
Day and a legal holiday; it also a Council meeting day. He asked
Council if they wished to set their meeting over to Tuesday. Mayor
Wilkins requested that the holiday schedule be brought back at the
next meeting and Council could discuss it at that time.
(c) MA, . Marden advised that the City had received $10,500
from the Atascadero Fire District at 6% interest
which must be paid back by January 1, 1980 or. before. He stated
that as of now, the financial picture for the City looks brighter
than a few weeks ago and it may not be necessary to use either this
money or the money Council authorized the City to borrow from the
Bank. The tax revenues are starting to flow; the City just received
over $37,000 from the State in motor vehicle license fees today.
(d) Mr. Warden explained that he had discussed the Public
Employees Retirement System benefits with a repre-
sentative of that organization and he feels that their retirement
package is very attractive for the City and its employees. He will
bring back a report for Council with information about securing an
actuarial study.
• 0
MINUTES - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting August 13, 1979
00 Page Ten
(e) Mr. Warden reviewed the financial picture of the
City to Council members. He stated that we should
receive somewhere in the area of $65,000 this month with costs
totalling approximately $4,500. Although there will be quite a few
expenditures during this year while different departments are being
set up, he felt that the City could expect a surplus at the end of
this fiscal year in the area of $500,000 to $600,000.
Mr. Warden discussed different ways the City can consider in
order to save money, such as establishing a public safety depart-
ment as opposed to the traditional fire and police departments.
(f) Mr. Warden requested an executive session to discuss
personnel matters.
Mayor Wilkins stated that the meeting would adjourn to executive
session and adjourn directly after that; there would be no announce-
ments after executive session.
The meeting adjourned at 10 :30 p.m.
Recorded by:
MURRAY L. WARDEN, City Clerk
By: Ardith Davis
Deputy City Clerk
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: City Council
FROM: City Manager
SUBJECT: Stinchfield and Summek-s CUP
This matter was heard by the Planning Commission on
August 20th and approved subject to the provisions of
the Staff report attached hereto. You may modify or
alter the conditions if you so desire or you may adopt
the recommendations of the Planning Commission.
16161,
'MUR Y 'WARDEN
MLW:ad
8-23-79
i
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
TO: ATASCADERO PLANNING COMMISSION DATE:AUGUST 20, 1979
FROM: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SECTION
SUBJECT: COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
U790611 : 2 - STINCHFIELD/SUMMERS - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO
ALLOW SIGNING IN EXCESS OF 60 SQUARE FEET IN A C-1 ZONE,
ATASCADERO
SPECIFIC REQUEST:
The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to allow
signing in excess of 60 square feet for a recently developed
nine-space professional office complex located at 4401 E1
Camino Real between San Anselmo and San Jacinto Avenues in
Atascadero. The applicant is seeking additional signing to
provide better identification within the complex, in addition
to the existing 40-square foot free-standing complex directory
located in the center of the site frontage on El Camino Real.
The 180 square feet of proposed additional signing would identify
each business within the complex by being located on the parapet
above each office space The maximum sign area proposed for
each tenant would be limited to twenty square feet . Consequently,
the proposed signing would increase the total area of on-site signing
from the existing 40 square feet to a total of 220 square feet .
ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN INFORMATION:
Zoning for the site is C-1, the General Shopping District which
allows signing in excess of 60 square feet subject to Conditional
Use Permit approval
The adopted 1978 Atascadero General Plan designates the site as
Retail Commercial. The Plan text_contains the following "General
Retail Policy Proposal" on page 47 which is relevant to this re-
quest :
113 Commercial uses should be developed in clusters
to encourage concentrations of compatible retail
trade service. Each cluster should be developed
in a coordinated architectural design. The sign-
ing and identification of the stores in each cluster
should be combined, thus reducing the confusing
clutter.
SITE CONSIDERATIONS:
The 1. 11 acre irregular shaped site is presently developed
with a professional office complex approximately 9,000 square
feet in floor area which is divided into nine rental office
spaces. Terrain for the majority of the site is generally
level as a result of grading with the southern and eastern
edges of the site rising abruptly to adjoining properties.
CD-1065
U790611: 2 STI FIELD/SUMMERS
Page 2
Building architecture is characteristic of a "Western Town"
style with each office space provided with a large "false-
front" facade which would accomodate the proposed signing.
AREA CONSIDERATIONS:
The site is located along the El Camino Real commercial
strip approximately one mile north of the Atascadero Central
Business District in an area of scattered commercial residential
uses. Land uses adjacent to the site include a convenience
market to the north with vacant land and commercial offices
beyond; single--family residences to the east ; vacant land
and service commercial uses to the south; and a church and
vacant land to the west across E1 Camino Real. Access to
the subject site and to other existing commercial properties
in the area is by means of E1 Camino Real.
STAFF COMMENTS:
The proposed signing, together with the existing directory
sign, represents an unobtrusive and uniformly designed
program properly suited to the identification needs of the
complex. Off-site identification from E1 Camino Real is
adequately provided by the existing directory sign. The
design and facade placement of the proposed signs would
complement the western motif of the project while attractively
identifying the individual businesses for on-site customer
and delivery convenience. Consequently, the proposed
signing program would not be excessive and would suitably
fulfill the project ' s on-site and off-site identification
needs.
RECOMMENDATION
It is the Staff recommendation that this Conditional Use
Permit be approved subject to the following:
Findings:
A. The requested signing would satisfy the project's
signing needs while being consistent with the emerging
character of commercial development along El Camino 'Real.
B. The proposed project is consistent with the mandatory
findings set forth in Section 22.92.080 (1) of the
County Zoning Ordinance.
U790611: 2 STIIOFIELD/SUMMERS
Page 3
Conditions:
1. Signing approved under this Conditional Use Permit is
limited to the following:
a. On-site signing shall be limited to a maximum total
area of 220 square feet , including the existing 40
square foot directory sign.
b. The proposed signing for the, individual offices shall
be limited to, a maximum of 20 square feet each for
a total maximum area of 180 square feet said pro-
posed signing shall be mounted flush with the building
facade and not extend above the facsia per the approved
sign elevations.
Report prepared by NANCY L. HEMMEN and
approved by Warren Hoag, Supervisor,
Development Review Section.
vl
— ---ate - ---_ _
19
e
4
224
225 ? i/t �3
226 DWI
/� 0
se Pt `�e 223 222 232231 cb>y.81 ��9 s9 3
P-1310 ,6 c 7p -
:.69 �� vnR 1 230
y otiS�'\ 221 229 /
0 a9 228 213 21?.: 211 1
0 o O ?/♦o o° \6 215 1 6
o `o a QPo2 220 1 / P 429
`�♦ 09 • \♦� ` 218 217 210 ZO
202 208 207
T' -1- csor
21 205 tZ
'A/ `qo ��� `\� , �o ♦oma oe eo c .:..6� ' 2p6 .10
�` t `'��, ^ ♦`•� 0 `oti, 9♦ ce`eojO y ,tp4
�9 ♦ yz 203
t u `w `
qb
,
g4 202
1P ` d`ry4 q1.. 99 98 g5 PO I—Z1 /90 /80
\ �0°u `9♦ a ♦rym 12'� v91 165 /8 �,a,,. �,?
RI NA ♦0 0 ♦p 125 124 Ze7
0� :a y 1 201' /�9 �Ite�►
ti P 3 I 192 /
n, 4? :b _vy� 2p0 193 a 30
Ise 1 / 31
a C g _ ` / _
N a a s a a y m y D_��187 9 194 2
a a y a a a a m `6T \S 3
Lo . 62. 6.6• . `�P ry � b O O 49 ae v � N 0
62r 2. " ya a c7 n y 494 Te °6 ��qa 4N \96 IT5 34
b♦ ��' 620 . 63q ti `7ry n; v 49� 4Qy v ym '
All '�"..,��\T9\ 197
35
F d� 6226 sa.�o ♦RIB2 .� s0 ° s? � srb. p 36 174 Be
SITE
' TE a� 198
, • U, p\•a 1699 3�
SJ k �� s4
V. ° g oP a a P- ��
9 IT3
ems.: e•
64�rIn
..8 ••co�s-61 R-I. D(sOb) p °je 170 - - -
- 65-4 ,a � I71
0
-A 6 yy ) q4 G °°• 4r ° ? q�.P 39 4
4•
ro
6 65 t 1
O O
♦ 0�i boi 0 '� P A
to
^�. 3 6b -etbk
10
2 6
Z A
`'66.0
AP
VICINITY
� {.� - �� 0
=, ti� ti ZONING MAP
3
� W L
ku
� N
i�' 4 It
tk
14
N
3 q
w
LL�
PROPOSED
SIGNING
'c
NMI
z
0
9
1r
N
Ir It
s W
l
a.
s
1d
1 ►
PROPOSED
SIGNING
LOCATIONS
� I M 11
acs
Ji �y r
yN ♦1
EXISTING
SIGNING
f- +
Irte-+ �-; ---� � 1 �
,
1 � �
' 4t
f
y-
l '
*
l
- i . �i--_.1• 1T� 1-'YT+_ -�,1_ � I_ -'�-T TI-r � r-i•-�� _.1 -L � .1._
1 f
I ^I I
7-1
,
IC-
I
1 -r
r _. ...J �--
...,moi I..W ..1./-_ :..,, �. I �, _._... i -r� , - f r- i-�.-•
• _ - --y-
,
,
- - i
IST : .� i
T ,
Y
*-1
F
T
11 '
TA
fit
12TIQca'
fl��zz�cr'o�Y
51 C-sna
SITE PLAN
• •
_M E M_O_R A N D_U M
TO: City Council
FROM: City Manager
SUBJECT: Public hearing on application of Charles Kamm for
a Tentative Tract Map to allow a 16-unit condo-
minium conversion subdivision on a 1. 07 acre site
This matter was published for a Council hearing on
August 27th, however, the Planning Commission has continued
its consideration of this matter, at the applicant's request,
until September 4th. Because of the previous legal ad, it
will be necessary to continue this hearing until your
regular meeting of September 24th. Your motion to this
effect will avoid the requirement for re-advertisement.
g
RRA rI . WARDEN
M W•
L .ad
8-23-79
M E M_0_R A_N_D_U M_
TO: City Council
FROM: City Manager
SUBJECT: Public hearing on application of Donald M. Rauch
for a Tentative Tract Map to allow a subdivision
of a . 49 acre site into a 5-unit condominium project
This matter was legally advertised for hearing on
August 27th, however, the Planning Commission denied the
applicant' s request fora subdivision. Under County ordin-
ances, the applicant has a right to appeal within ten days
after Planning Commission action. It is my understanding
that it is the intention of the individual to appeal,
however, he has not yet done so. Consequently, the hearing
for August 27th is no longer appropriate. Upon receipt of
the applicant's request for an appeal, the matter will be
re-advertised and re-scheduled.
M RAY WARDEN U
MLW:ad
8-23-79
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: City Council
FROM: City Manager
SUBJECT: Purchase of a public address system
As you know, we have been utilizing borrowed sound
equipment for the Council and Planning Commission meetings.
I have looked at three different sources for public address
systems and have found prices ranging from $2898 to $3751.
The two most feasible appear to be a submission by
Mid State Sound System from San Luis Obispo which would
provide an amplifier, recording system with seven microphones
and two speakers, and a rolling cabinet for storage in the
amount of $3,016. 98 including taxes. The other is from
Vanderlip Enterprises in Atascadero which provides eleven
microphones, four wall speakers , a cassette tape deck,
amplifier, and a cabinet for $2898 including taxes. Both
of these proposals would allow for a wheeled cabinet with
built-in capability for storage and use by both the Planning
Commission and Council or any other meetings of that nature.
The Vanderlip proposal would provide a floor mike for audience
use and enough mikes for staff use. Both the Mid State and
Vanderlip proposals use reputable materials with the major
difference being price
With these considerations in mind, I recommend that we
Memorandum - PA system
Page Two
accept the Vanderlip proposal and that this system be installed
as soon as possible. Your approval of this recommendation
by motion would be appropriate.
AUR L. WARDEN
MLW:ad
8-23-79
r
• D's
MEM O_R A N D U M_
TO: City Council
FROM: City Manager
SUBJECT: Employee holidays
In adopting the County Code, we have both Labor Day
and September 9th, Admission Day, as legal holidays. All
cities in the County gave the Labor Day holiday and some
join with the County in giving Admission Day as a holiday.
All grant from eleven to twelve holidays throughout the
year. The question, then, arises, does the City Council
intend to follow the County ordinance as previously adopted
with respect to the Admission Day holiday? If so, then
the City Council meeting of September 10th should be moved
to September 11th. If not, then the Council should make
this an exception to the County/City ordinance.
Attached is a list of holidays as adopted by the
City through the County ordinances.
;UR Y L WARDEN Lam `
MLW:ad
8-23-79
`J
t a!
2 44. 070
The committee shall be composed of the fo dowing members
or their designees : The county administrative officer, county
personnel director, the department head of th department in
which the employee works, a member of the sh iff ' s depart-
ment employees ' association , and a fifth me er` from among the
county department heads chosen by the four bove members.
(e) The benefits provided for in t s section shall be
integrated with workers compensation bene its so that, if em-
ployees are entitled to such benefits, o ly the difference
between the workers compensation paymen and the employee ' s
salary shall be paid under the provisi ns of this section.
(f) The benefits provided for der this section shall
be in addition to any sick leave ben its, but any employee
who is receiving payment pursuant t this section shall not
be entitled to sick leave payments or the same day or days.
(g This section shall not a construed as adopting
any of the provisions of Division 4 , Part 2, Chapter 2 ,
Article 7 of the Labor Code of t e state.
(i) This section shall a ply only to covered employees
serving in regular permanently allocated positions as identified
in subsection (b) of this sec ' on, including their service as
a reserve deputy sheriff. A other reserve deputies are
expressly excluded from the rovisions of this section.
(j ) The determinatio of disability by the special
disability benefit committ a under the provisions of this
section is expressly limi ed to carrying out the purposes
of this section and shat in no be construed as having
any binding effect on t San Luis Obispo County pension
trust with respect to y subsequent application for disability ,
retirement. (Ord. 18 §l , 1977) .
2. 44 . 070 Holidays and time off, (a) The following
are established as paid holidays for all permanent county
employees :
(1) January 1 (New Year' s Day) ;
(2 ) February 12 (Lincoln ' s Birthday);
(3) The third Monday in February (Washington' s
Birthday) ;
(4) The last Monday in May (Memorial Day) ;
(5) July 4 (Independence Day) ;
(6) First Monday in September (Labor Dav) ;
(7) September 9 (Admission Day) ; eT
(8) The second Monday in October (Columbus Day) ;
(9) November 11 (Veterans ' Day) ;
(10) That day in November designated as Thanksgiving Day;
(11) The Friday in November immediately following the
day designated as Thanksgiving Day;
(12) December 25 (Christmas Day) ;
(13) All other days as may be proclaimed by the Govern-
or of the state of California or the President of the United
States.
34-4 (San Luis Obispo
County 3/30/78)
o
M E M ORA N D U M
TO: City Council
FROM: City Manager
SUBJECT: Consideration of Public Employees Retirement System
In a previous meeting, I asked your consideration of
entering into the State Public Employees Retirement System.
I will provide a verbal summary of PERS provisions Monday
night.
4RAY7. WARDEN
MLW:ad G (� �
8- 3-79
C � s
ti
. r
r
J
t�
07
_M_E M O R A N D U M
TO: City Council
FROM: City Manager
SUBJECT: Temporary budget
I have placed this matter on the agenda although I do
not yet have the final copies prepared. Hopefully, copies
will be available prior to Monday night' s meeting. If not,
then the item should be continued to the next meeting. If
I do get the written budget prepared, then I suggest that
we summarize it verbally Monday night and continue it to the
next meeting so as to provide you with more time. By following
this process, we will at least get the item started for con-
sideration.
In considering this temporary budget, you should be
aware that there are a great number of unknowns simply
because we don't have a track record of our income and expen-
ditures nor do we have a determination as to the overall
structure of the City. I have, therefore, used the LAFCO
personnel structure as a guide. A budget, even the temporary
one, will serve as a framework within which we can work. It
can be modified as needed as we progress through the year.
When the department heads are on board, we will then be better
able to provide hard figures. I would like to reiterate
that this budget is only an assist to get us through the next
few months and will need a great deal of refinement as we
go along.
G
MU Y L WARDEN
LW:-.ad
8-23-79