Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 04/25/1995 PUBLIC REVIEW COPY " Please do not M=12 fid+ mcouniar AGENDA ATASCADERO CITYCOUNCIL REGULAR MEETING'' CITY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 6500 PALMA AVENUE, 4TH FLOOR ROTUNDA ROOM Tuesday, April 25, 1995 7:00 P.M. This agenda is prepared and posted pursuant to the requirements of Government Code Section 54954.2. By listing a topic on this agenda, the City Council has expressed its intent to discuss and act on each item. In addition to any action identi red in the brief general description of each item, the action that may be taken shall inclu : A referral to staff with specific requests for information; continuance; specific di cdon to staff concerning the policy ormission of the item;discontinuance of consideratio ;authorization to enter into negotiations and execute agreements pertaining to the ite ; adoption or approval; and, disapproval. Copies of the staff reports or other documentation relating to each item of business referred to on the agenda are on file in the office of the City Clerk !Room 08) and in the Information Office (Room 103), available for public inspection during Cit Hall business hours. The City Clerk will answer any questions regarding the agenda. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need sped assistance to participate in a City meeting of other services offered by this City,please ntact the City Manager's Office[(8051 461-50 10) or the City Clerk's Office((8051 461- 74). Notifica- tion at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time when services are neede will assist the City staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting or service. RULES OF PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: PLEASE SEE BACK PAGE CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS PROCLAMATIONS: o "Public Schools Week", April 24-28, 1995 (CaliforniaMasons) O "Crime Victims' Rights Week", April 23-29, 1995 (Women's Shelter) 0 "National Day of Service", April 25, 1995 o "Day of Prayer", May 5, 1995 (Atascadero Kiwanis lub) '�" 0 "City Clerks Week", May 7-13, 1995 COMMUNITY FORUM: Please see "Rules of Public Participation" (Back Page) O Charles Paddock Zoo: Workday challenge (Jody Neal) A. CONSENT CALENDAR: All matters listed under ItemA, Consent Calendar, are considered to be routine, and will be enacted by one motion in the form fisted below. There will be no separate discussion on these items. A member of the Council or public may, by request, have any item removed from the Consent Calendar, which shall then be reviewed and acted upon separately after the adoption of the Consent Calendar: 1, CITY COUNCIL'MINUTES - March 28, `1995 City Clerk recommendation: Approve 2. CITY TREASURER'S REPORT - March, 1995 City Treasurer's recommendation: Review and accept 3. APPROVAL OF WARRANTS FOR MONTH OF MARCH, 1995 Staff recommendation: Review and accept 4. CAMINO'REAL-(FASHION OUTLET) ASSESSMENT DISTRICT-Acceptance of public improvements Staff recommendation: Accept as complete 5. INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY - Appointment of Delegate and Alternate Staff recommendation: Ratify Mayor's appointments 6. CITIZENS' TASK FORCE FOR ECONOMIC RECOVERY Appointment of Council members (2) and at-large Council appointees (3) Staff recommendation: Approve appointments 7. ECONOMIC ROUND TABLE - Appointment of 5 members-at-large Staff recommendation: Ratify Council appointments 8. RESQLUTION NO.33-95-Supporting the Central Coast Regional Technology Alliance Staff recommendation: Adopt 9. RESOLUTION NO. 32-95 Declaring weeds a public nuisance and commencing abatement proceedings Staff recommendation: Adopt B. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. AMAPOA-TECORIDA DRAINAGE PLAN - Presentation of Draft Plan and alternatives for protecting area from flooding Staff recommendation: 1)Review&provide staff direction; 2)Direct staff to conduct public meetings 2 2. 1995 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG)` - Consideration of proposed allocation of $248,600 for local projects Staff recommendation: Approve as amended 3. ORDINANCE NO. 287 - Proposed amendment to Zoning Ordinance text comprehen- sively amending the uses allowed in the CN Neighborhood Commercial zone (Hawkins Plaza/Golden West Development) Staff recommendation: (1) motion to waive reading in full and read by title only, and (2) motion to introduce on first reading by title only C. REGULAR BUSINESS: 1. SUPERVOTE - Consideration of alternatives to the "Supervote" (response to request from the San Luis Obispo Council of Governments) Staff recommendation: Eliminate supervote and provide direction to City's SLOCOG delegate 2. TRIP REDUCTION RULE OPTIONS - Consideration of alternatives for compliance with the Air Pollution Control Board's Clean Air Plan Staff recommendation: Request that the APCD reconsider their,rejection of Rule 901 3. SLORTA FUNDING FORMULA - SLOCOG request for revised formula Staff recommendation: Endorse proposed 49/18 funding formula • 4. INTERIM INVESTMENT POLICY Staff recommendation: Review and adopt updated interim policy 5. CITY OF PASO ROBLES' REQUEST FOR FUNDING ASSISTANCE TO HIGHLIGHT CONCERNS REGARDING THE POTENTIAL ECONOMIC IMPACT IN THE EVENT OF THE CLOSURE OF FORT HUNTER LIGGETT Staff recommendation: Review and consider 6. FINANCE DIRECTOR'S REPORT - March, 1995 Staff recommendation: Approve D. COMMITTEE REPORTS (The following represent ad hoc or standing committees. Informative status reports will be given, as felt necessary.): 1 . S.L.O. Council of Governments/S.L.O. Regional Transit ,Authority 2. City/School Committee 3. County Water Advisory Board/Nacimiento Water Purveyors Advisory Group 4. Economic Round Table 5. Finance Committee 6. Highway 41 Realignment Community Advisory Committee 7. Air Pollution Control District 8. Upper Salinas River Coordinated Resource Management and Planning Committee 9. North County Council 3 E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION: 1. City Council . 2. City Attorney 3. City Clerk 4. City Treasurer 5. City Manager F. CLOSED SESSION: 1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION Name of Case: Elliott v. City of Atascadero 4 'Public schools week" April 24-28, 1995 WHEREAS, The CalVornia Masons have declared the week of Ayril 24-28, 1995, to be "public schools week" in Atascadero; and WHEREAS, The Masons understand the necessity for a strong yublic schools system, as indicated in their observance Of the theme, "Free Public Education--America's Greatest Freedom'; NOW, THEREFORE, The City Council of Atascadero, state of California, is yleased to join the California Masons in yroclaiming Ayril 24-28, 1995, as 'Public Schools week. FURTHERMORE, The city Council wishes to take this oyyortunity to extend its gratitude to the Atascadero unified School District and teaching staff for their ongoing efforts in yromoting the education and w4are of Atascadero's youth. ; Q R. DAVID BEWLEY, Mayor City of Atascadero, CA Ayril 25, 1995 "Crime ViCUIHS' Rights week" April 23-29, 1995 WHEREAS, One violent crime is committed in America every 16 seconds; and WHEREAS, With 35 million Americans victimized in the united States each year, crime victims are rapidly becoming a majority; and WHEREAS, During 1994, the San Luis Obispo County Victim/Witness Center assisted 3,547 new victims of crime, an increase of 12% over 1993; and WHEREAS, As a nation devoted to liberty and justice for all, America must ylant the seeds of justice to protect and restore crime victims' rights; and WHEREAS, Harvesting justice over the vast two decades has been accomylished in yart 17 the millions of survivors of crime, their families and advocates whose commitment and spirit has ersevered while con ontifi an increasingly violent nation; and WHEREAS, Safi Luis Obisyo county crime victims are better served through the collaborative efforts of local victim service agencies and grouys including the worth County Women's Resource Center, the District Attorney's Victim/Witness Assistance Center, Social Services' Adult and child Protective Services, the Raye Crisis center, the San Luis Obispo Women's shelter Program, MADD and the Homicide Survivors Group; THEREFORE, The City Council of the City of Atascadero yroclaims Aril 23-29, 1995, as "San Luis Obispo County Victims' Rights week". z. R. DAVID BEWLEY, Mayor City of Atascadero, California April 25, 1995 "Volunteer Reco&nition Dai"" April 25 1995 WHEREAS, one of our community's greatest resources is its volunteers, who each year contribute thousands of hours to the City o f Atascadero, its staff and citizens; and WHEREAS, These volunteers give freely o f their time, energy and ability, and ask only for a smile and a thank you for their countless hours of service; and WHEREAS, Their work is o f the highest juality and brightens the lives o f others each day, yroviding invaluable assistance at City Hall, at the Charles Paddock zoo, the Police Facility and throughout the City o f Atascadero; and WHEREAS, The Nation is observing National volunteer Week Ayril 24 through April 28, 1995; NOW, THEREFORE, I David Bewley, Mayor of the Cify of Atascadero, do hereby proclaim Ayrd 25, 1995, as 'volunteer Recognition Day" and take great yleasure in exyressing sincere gratitude and appreciation for the dedication, sel ess and comyassionate contributions made by volunteers apliated with the R.S.V.P., A.A.R.P. and C.A.L.L. Programs. R. DAVID BEWLEY, Mayor City of Atascadero, Calforftia Ayril 25, 1995 'Day o f Prayer May 4, 1995 WHEREAS, May 4th, 1995, is National Day o f Prayer; and WHEREAS, In keeping with the objectives of Kiwanis International "to give primacy to the human and spiritual rather than to the material values of life'; Atascadero Kiwanis is sponsoring an interdenominational community-wide Prayer Breakfast on May 4th, from 6:45 - 8:00 a.m. at the Lake Park Pavilion; and WHEREAS, this event will bring together the many religious congregations and the civic leaders for a nationally recognized day; NOW, THEREFORE, The Council of the City of Atascadero hereby proclaims May 4, 1995 to be: 'Day o f Prayer" R. DAVID BEWLEY, Mayor City o f Atascadero, California April 25, 1995 A;L i'ns roa.5: Tom 1"I:Im E.B. C1;A( I) Y<ll ,rII Rwrow Rich FIS111,R ATASGADERO BIBLE CHURCH NIWSCAM-azo MALI, AT FREEWAY 101 ❖ PHONE 805-466-2051 ❖ P.O. Box 987 •3 ArASCADERO,CAI,AFORNIA 93423-0987 April 10, 1995 Mayor David.Bewley ,_....--- City of Atascadero ATA SCADER0 0+l'i F °.GER 6500 Palma r.. Atascadero, CA 93422 Dear Mayor Bewley, Kiwanis is proud to sponsor our 2nd Annual Prayer Breakfast on the National Day of Prayer, May 4, 1995. Atascadero Kiwanis is seeking the approval and endorsement from the City of Atascadero. We feel that this event will bring together the many religious congregations and the civic leaders for a nationally recognized day. It is recognized that many religions will be represented at this event,and therefore an attempt will be made to maintain respect for each religion. Atascadero Kiwanis would like to invite the Mayor of Atascadero and all the City Council, as well as the city department heads to the "Atascadero Community Prayer Breakfast" on Thursday,May 4th,from 6:45- 8:00 AM at the Lake Park Pavilion. We would appreciate a proclamation of May 4, 1995, as "Day of Prayer". Sincerely yours, Tom Ferrell db enclosure: copy of last year's proclamation I. V A N C 1; 1, 1 C A I, NON 1) B NOM I NATIONAL 1 N O E P C N 1) E N "1' "city Berks' week- May Ma 7-13, 1995 WHEREAS, the off ice of city clerk is the oldest among yublic servants;, and WHEREAS, the off ice of city Clerk yrovides the pro f essional link between citizens, local governing bodies; and WHEREAS, the city clerk has yledged to be ever mindful of neutrality and impartiality, rendering equal service to all; and WHEREAS, the City Clerk serves as the information center on functions of local government and community; and WHEREAS, the City Clerk continually strives to imyrove the administration of the affairs of the off ice through yarticipation in pro f essional organizations and educational programs; and WHEREAS, it u most appropriate that we recognize the accomplishments o f the office o f city Clerk. NOW, THEREFORE, 1, DAVID BEWLEY, Mayor of the City of Atascadero, do hereby yroclaim May 7 through 13, 1995 as "City Clerks' Week', and further extend appreciation to all City Clerks for the vital services they perform and their exemplary dedication to the communities they represent. R. DAVID BEWLEY, Mayor City of Atascadero, California Ayril 25, 1995 Agenda Item: A-1 Meeting Date: 4/25/95 ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL MARCH 28, 1995 MINUTES 6:00 P.M. SPECIAL SESSION: 1. CITIZENS TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE (CTAC) A. City Council Interviews B. Resolution No. 30-95 - Appointing the Atascadero delegate to CTAC The City Council met at 6:00 p.m. for purposes of interviewing five citizens who had applied to serve as Atascadero's delegate to the Citizens Transportation Advisory Committee. All members of Council were present. Roll Call and the Pledge of Allegiance were deferred until the regular session. Interviewed were Atascadero residents Peter Boonisar, Patrick Dempsey, Leon Korba Jim Edwards and Lorene Cabrera. Following the interviews the City Council selected, by ballot, Jim Edwards to serve on a 4:1 vote (Luna). The Council unanimously agreed to appoint Mr. Edwards to an initial term of two years with the provision that the term may be extended by an additional two years with Council consensus. MOTION: By Councilman Carden, seconded by Councilman Highland to adopt Resolution No. 30-95 appointing Jim Edwards to the Citizens Transportation Advisory Committee; motion passed 5:0. 7:00 P.M. REGULAR SESSION: The Mayor called the regular session to order at 7:06 p.m. Councilperson Luna led the Pledge of Allegiance. CC 03/28/95 Page 1 ROLL CALL: Present: Councilmembers Carden, Highland, Johnson, Luna and Mayor Bewley Absent: None Also Present: Muriel "Micki" Korba, City Treasurer and Lee Price, City Clerk Staff Present: Andy Takata, City Manager; Henry Engen, Community Development Director; Art Montandon, City Attorney; Brady Cherry, Director of Community Services; Brad Whitty, Finance Director; Lts. Bill Watton and John Barlow, Police Department and Steve Sylvester, City Engineer COUNCIL COMMENTS: Councilman Highland referenced an article written by reporter Maggie White of the Telegram-Tribune regarding the March 29th Council of Governments special meeting regarding the fallen Curbaril bridge and Highway 41 issue. He stated that, although he agreed with the opinion Ms. White was expressing, he disagreed with the article's placement in the paper and pointed out it should have been published with the commentaries. Councilman Johnson asked if a recent incident involving high school students at the Sunken Gardens was gang-related. Lt. Watton reported and confirmed that the incident was not gang-related. PRESENTATIONS: Welcome visiting Lithuanian Police Delegation Lt. Barlow introduced members of the Lithuanian Police Delegation. The Mayor presented the visitors withcertificatesconveying honorary citizenship. PROCLAMATION: Mayor Bewley read the proclamation for "Month of the Child" and presented it to Supervisor David Blakely and children and parents of the localHead Start Program. The children presented the Council with "Celebrate Children" ribbons. CC 03/28/95 Page 2 COMMUNITY FORUM: Waymond Smith, 8710 Azucena, complained that a neighbor in his area has installed a fence without a permit and that the fence is obstructing the natural drainage flow. He asked that this matter (and other concerns relating to drainage) be addressed. Mr. Smith also asked when the Amapoa/Tecorida drainage plan will come to the Council. Steve Sylvester replied that the plan was scheduled for the second Council meeting in April. Councilman Luna commented that staff should identify and include relevant complaint issues at the same time as the plan comes forward. The City Manager suggested that Mr. Smith contact Bill Wittmeyer, Compliance Official, regarding his complaint. Eric Greening, 7365 Valle, extended congratulations to Jim Edwards for being appointed to the CTAC member. William Zimmerman, 6225 Lomitas, recommended that the City Treasurer be included as a member of the Citizens Task Force for Economic Recovery.' Carla Cole, Mercedes Avenue resident, asserted that certain rules of public participation were not followed at the last meeting of the Council and voiced disapproval that the Mayor allowed certain comments directed at certain individuals. Rush Kolemaine, Potrero Road resident, stated that staff had not been responsive to direction from the Planning Commission regarding the Economic Development Element and suggested that the City Council instruct the City Manager to look into the matter. A. CONSENT CALENDAR: 1. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - March 14, 1995 City Clerk recommendation: Approve 2. CITY TREASURER'S REPORT - February, 1995 City Treasurer's recommendation: Review and accept 3. EMERGENCY REPAIRS: LAUREL ROAD Staff recommendation: Review and accept The City Clerk made a minor correction to the Minutes of March 14th. There was consensus to approve the correction as noted. MOTION: By Councilman Johnson, seconded by Councilman Carden to approve the Consent Calendar Items #A-1 through 4; motion CC 03/28/95 . Page 3 passed 5:0 by roll call vote. B. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT - Consideration of the Planning Commission's recommended additional element to the General Plan A. Resolution No. 15-95 - Approving an amendment of the General Plan by adoption of an Economic Development Element (GPA 94-006; City of Atascadero) Planning Commission recommendation: Approve as amended Henry Engen provided the staff report and Planning Commission recommendation. Council comments followed. Councilman Highland stated that he was disturbed with the whole document. He commented that after reviewing the Planning Commission minutes, he notes that 14 changes staff was directed to make were not made. He submitted that the document should be sent back to staff with direction to include all changes requested. Henry Engen reported that the City Planner had compiled revisions approved by Planning Commission consensus and the revised document had passed on a 4:3 vote by the Planning Commission. He noted that he would assume that the Planning Commission would have protested if they felt that the final draft was not responsive to their direction. Councilman Luna remarked that the document has changed dramatically since it was first introduced and asserted that he cannot support it the way it is written. Councilman Johnson summarized his proposed changes which were reviewed by the Economic Round Table and are included in the staff report. Councilman Highland questioned why there had not been more public testimony at the Planning Commission hearing considering the number of substantial changes. Public Comments: Bob Johnson, Planning Commission Chairman, commented that he would have liked to have heard the comments of the Chamber of Commerce and the Economic Round Table before the document was ultimately approved by the Commission. He suggested that the City Council direct staff to include the omitted revisions and send the matter back for additional public hearing at the Planning Commission level. CC 03/28/95 Page 4 • Rush Kolemaine commented that the Element needs to have teeth in it in order to protect the economic health of the community. He encouraged the Council to take the time to prepare a good document. William Zimmerman suggested that the City Council seek input from the Citizens Task Force on Economic Recovery. He added that the document should be consumer oriented and reflect what the community needs are. Doug Lewis, Tunitas Avenue resident, requested clarification of the Carlton Hotel Project and relevant community block grant funding. Henry Engen provided the status report. Sid Bowen, Planning Commission member, suggested that the Council provide the Commission with specific guidelines should the matter be returned for further study. Rush Kolemaine added that the Palmer-Koert report provides the methodology for determining sales revenue loss and other information that is available. Doug Lewis commented that he does not find any analysis about how Atascadero goes about doing its business. ---End of Public Testimony--- Council discussion followed. Councilman Carden provided an overview of recommended revisions submitted (see Exhibit A). Councilman Luna declared that the Economic Element commits the City to spend money that it does not have. He said that if it is adopted, he will find it difficult to explain to the taxpayer why his roads are not fixed and why his drainage problems are not solved. He noted that he favored Mr. Zimmerman's suggestion that the Citizens Task Force review and comment on the document. Councilman Johnson indicated support for sending the matter back to staff and the Planning Commission. Councilman Highland remarked that the Element is a document that need not be rushed. Councilman Carden spoke in favor of providing incentives for new development and aggressively pursuing fiscally prudent investments. Councilman Luna asserted that he had difficulty with the number of "shalls" being proposed for the document and questioned why there was no economic analysis. Councilman Carden argued that the Fiscal Element of the General Plan provides that CC 03/28/95 Page 5 information. Mayor Bewley remarked that the recommendation for the formation of an economic development agency for the downtown is too restrictive and proposed that it should be expanded. The City Clerk noted that Micki Ready, Manager of the Atascadero Chamber of Commerce, was not present due to illness and had requested that the matter be deferred until the Chamber Board has had ample opportunity to comment on the document. Henry Engen noted that State Law will require that the matter be re-heard at the Planning Commission level because of the substantial changes proposed. By Council consensus, the Economic Element was referred back to the Planning Commission. Staff was directed to incorporate all changes proposed at the January 17, 1995 Planning Commission meeting. In addition, comments submitted by Councilmembers Johnson and Carden shall be considered and brought forward as options. There was mutual agreement that the matter is not to be fast-tracked but rather given thorough review and study before it is brought back to the City Council C. REGULAR BUSINESS: 1. RESOLUTION NO. 29-95 - Supporting the construction of the Alternate A (Modified) alignment of the Highway 41 bridge across the Salinas River given the failure of the existing Curbaril Bridge (NOTE: THIS IS NOT A PUBLIC HEARING) Councilman Carden recommendation: Adopt The Mayor reported that Ken Nelson, CalTrans District Director, intends to pursue purchase of existing rights-of-way on the east side of Atascadero and route traffic down Cemetery Road onto Capistrano Avenue. He suggested that the proposed resolution be amended to reflect this action. Councilman Luna read the following prepared statement into the record: "Now that CalTrans has decided to go forward with the bridge and realignment of Route 41, it is important to mitigate construction impacts on the downtown, the schools, and the affected residential neighborhoods. If there is an attempt by CalTrans to piecemeal the project as they suggested at last Wednesday's meeting, then Atascadero will have to live with detours and a construction nightmare that might last into the next century. The resolution could and should be amended to make clear that the majority CC 03/28/95 Page 6 of the Atascadero City Council consider the bridge, the realignment, and the interchange improvements as one project. Recall that the Atascadero City Council, on a 4 to 0 vote, selected the Proposed Improvements Option as identified in the DKS Project Study Report on the Highway 101/41 Interchange". Councilman Highland commented that in reality the project will be built in phases as funding becomes available. Councilman Luna asserted that the City ought to know, before moving ahead, how long each stage will take to complete. Councilman Johnson spoke in favor of replacing the bridge as soon as possible and moving forward with the road realignment as funding becomes available. Councilman Carden reported that the funding for rights-of-way will be acted upon by the Council of Governments (COG) in June. He speculated that bridge construction will be expedited while the realignment project will be completed according to the previously published schedule. Public Comments: Peter Boonisar, 5212 Magdelena, recognized the State's present fiscal situation and spoke in opposition to temporary re-routing as proposed. Carla Cole, Mercedes Avenue resident, spoke in opposition to constructing the project in a piecemeal fashion and urged the Council not to subject the City to a long-term iconstruction nightmare. Eric Greening, 7365 Valle Avenue, agreed with the two previous speakers and noted that a phased construction has not been subject to environmental study. ---End of Public Testimony--- Councilman Johnson suggested that Section 2 of the resolution be amended by adding the words, "or similar" just after "Bailey bridge. MOTION: By Councilman Carden, seconded by Councilman Johnson to approve Resolution No. 29-95 as amended; motion passed 4:1 (Luna). MOTION: By Councilman Carden, seconded by Councilman Johnson to authorize staff to negotiate with CalTrans for an alternate realignment. Motion amended: Councilman Highland suggested that the word "temporary" CC 03/28/95 Page 7 be added just before the word "alternate" and that the City street names be specified. Councilman Carden re-phrased his motion as follows: To allow City staff and the Mayor to enter into negotiations with CalTrans to provide a temporary alternate (along Mercedes, Capistrano and Santa Ysabel Avenues) to the Highway 41 route during the construction of the bridge and that the Highway 41 A-Modified Alternate is to be temporary only until the A-Modified Alternate and bridge are complete. Councilman Johnson agreed to the amendment. Vote on Amended Motion: Motion passed 4:1 (Luna)• The Mayor called a 10-minute break at 8:47 p.m. At 8:57 p.m., the meeting resumed. 2. INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY (IWMA) A. Joint Powers Agreement - To join the IWMA for SLO county and cities Staff recommendation: Adopt B. Appointments to the IWMA - Delegate and alternate Henry Engen provided the staff report and recommendations. Council comments followed. Councilman Highland declared that he would not vote in favor of the Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) if the "supervote" provision remains in the document. Councilman Luna argued that the City will gain nothing by not joining and suggested that the Council give direction to the delegate to work with other delegates to eliminate the supervote. Councilman Johnson agreed and discussion ensued. MOTION: By Councilman Carden, seconded by Mayor Bewley to sign the JPA with the agreement that joining will be temporary contingent upon the provision that the [appointed delegate work to] eliminate within 60 days the supervote provision. Discussion on the motion: Councilman Highland voiced opposition and stated that the Council needs simply to decide whether or not to join, appoint the City's delegate and then instruct him to bring the matter of the supervote before the IWMA Board. Councilman Johnson agreed. Councilman Carden withdrew his motion. MOTION: By Councilman Johnson, seconded by Councilman Luna to sign CC 03/28/95 Page 8 the JPA; motion passed 5:0 with reluctant "yes" votes from • Councilmembers Highland and Carden. MOTION: By Councilman Johnson, seconded by Councilman Carden to instruct the delegate to place on the [IWMABoard] agenda the elimination of the supervote and have this action completed within the next 6 months; motion passed 5:0. The City Manager asked members of the City Council to contact the Mayor if they are interested in being appointed as the City's delegate to the IWMA Board. This matter will come back at the next meeting. Bill Worrell, IWMA Manager, commented that he was looking forward to working with the City. 3. ECONOMIC ROUND TABLE RECOMMENDATIONS (Cont'd from 3/14/95) A. Resolution No. 01-95 - Affirming advisory committee's purpose and revising membership ERT recommendation: Adopt Henry Engen introduced the item and presented the Economic Round Table's recommendation. Councilman Johnson, Economic Round Table member, provided some background for the recommendations and spoke in support. Public Comments: Melanie Dunn, Atascadero State Hospital, commended the City Council for continuing the Economic Element and observed that there is no representation for the State Hospital on the Economic Round Table or the Citizens Task Force for Economic Recovery. She suggested that the City Council consider Atascadero State Hospital as a consumer and spoke in favor of have the hospital represented. Ms. Dunn indicated that she would be willing to serve in this capacity and provided the City Clerk with a letter of recommendation. ---End of Public Testimony--- Mayor Bewley asked Councilman Johnson if State Hospital representation had been considered. Councilman Johnson indicated that the issue had not been raised before or discussed, probably because the Hospital is outside the City's jurisdiction. Councilman Luna mentioned that he could support a "consumer" representative on the Economic Round Table. He also pointed out that the City Treasurer is not listed as CC 03/28/95 Page 9 a member of the Round Table. Councilman Johnson reported that the City Treasurer has requested that she not be included in the membership. Councilman Highland suggested that the resolution be amended to reflect that members-at-large may be from the business, financial or consumer community. MOTION: By Councilman Highland, seconded by Councilman Luna to adopt Resolution No. 01-95 as revised. Discussion on the motion: The City Clerk suggested that the City Council specify in the resolution how the members-at-large are to be appointed. Discussion ensued. There was agreement that each councilmember shall appoint one member-at-large who shall serve a term coterminous with that of the appointing councilmember. The Clerk noted that appropriate language would be added to resolution. Vote on the motion: Motion to adopt Resolution No. 01-95 as amended passed 5.0 by roll call vote. B. Downtown zoning - Initiating text amendment to allow offices on the first floor in the Pedestrian Retail Overlay Zone without requiring CUP approval ERT recommendation: Approve Henry Engen provided the report and recommendation. The Council expressed support for initiating the zoning text amendment as recommended by the Economic Round Table. 4. RESOLUTION NO. 26-95 - Consideration of Planning Commission's proposed procedures for processing General Plan amendment requests Planning Commission recommendation: Approve Henry Engen provided the staff report and recommendation to approve. Brief discussion ensued. Councilman Highland asked the City Attorney if it is legal for staff to refuse to accept an application for a General Plan Amendment and send it through the process. Art Montandon advised that unless the Council adopts a specific ordinance setting forth a policy for rejection, the City must accept all applications. Councilman Highland declared that the City Council should not see General Plan amendment applications until after they have gone through the normal process. Art Montandon explained that this issue is really a matter of jurisdictional preference. CC 03/28/95 Page 10 . Councilman Carden spoke in favor of the recommendation and stated that people deserve the petition process. Councilman Johnson inquired if there was any provision for gathering a "sense of the Council" before applicants pay their fees. Henry Engen reported that normally an applicant pays the fee but the City Council has ultimate discretion to waive or provide a refund. MOTION: By Councilman Luna, seconded by Councilman Highland to adopt Resolution No. 26-95, motion unanimously passed. 5. GOLDEN WEST DEVELOPMENT REQUEST TO HAVE SPRING BOND PAYMENT MADE WITH EXCESS CONSTRUCTION FUNDS (Factory Outlet) Mayor Bewley stepped down because of a potential conflict of ,interest. The City Attorney provided an overview of the request by Goldenwest Development that payment of the bond assessment due in April be collected from excess construction funds and responded to questions from the City Council. Mr. Montandon explained that the participation agreement between the City and Golden West Development provides that the City will pay half of the sales tax received up to either one-half the assessment or $92,000, whichever is less. He reported that the payment is made semi-annually in the year after the sales tax is received and added that the City is not legally obligated to make a payment until December, 1995. He noted further that the project's initial completion date was delayed and the first payment of sales tax revenue was not received by the City until early 1995. The City Manager explained that the City will receive in March sales tax revenue collected in the fourth quarter of last year (1994). He projected that the exact amount of sales tax from the Factory Outlet stores will not be known until April. The City Attorney reported that excess bond proceeds may be used, but pointed out that those funds are in the Orange County Investment Pool and not, therefore, accessible. Grant monies, he added, may or may not be used as it may constitute a gift of public funds. He suggested that the Council consider action to defer the April 10th payment of the bond (collected by the County in April for payment in September) and waive the late penalty. Councilman Johnson indicated support and suggested that the Council direct the City Attorney to negotiate a deferment without jeopardizing the bond issue. Councilman Carden asked if the bonds can be re-financed. The City Attorney reported that staff is considering this option and plans to bring the matter back at a later date. CC 03/28/95 Page 11 Public Comments: 0 Chuck Voorhis, President of Golden West Development, spoke in favor of the request and highlighted benefits to the City the Factory Outlet is providing. He clarified that he was not asking for a hand-out and explained that the request is for excess construction funds not required to make public improvements. Responding to inquiry from Councilman Johnson, Mr. Voorhis estimated sales tax for the first quarter of 1995 to be approximately $90,000 and speculated that when the outlet center is full it will be producing revenue beyond original projections. ---End of Public Testimony--- By consensus, the City Council directed staff to send a letter to the County requesting that the April payment be delayed without penalty. 6. CITIZENS TASK FORCE FOR ECONOMIC RECOVERY A. City Council appointments B. Status of community group & remaining appointments Andy Takata reported that his office had received only five responses to a letter sent to community groups requesting participation. He noted that many of clubs have not yet met to discuss the matter and suggested that the deadline to respond be extended. Staff, he added, will make follow-up calls. Mayor Bewley asked that the members of the Council let him know if they want to serve on the Task Force. He also reported that the Rotary Club has declined participation. By mutual consent, the matter of specific appointments was continued. Councilman Luna commented that he favored Mr. Zimmerman's earlier suggestion that the City Treasurer be included on the Task Force. There was agreement and Ms. Korba indicated she was willing to serve. 7. ORDINANCE NO. 284 - Amending the official City zoning map by rezoning real property located at 3555 EI Camino Real from RS to RSF-Y (ZC 94006) Staff recommendation: (1) Motion to adopt on second reading by title only MOTION: By Councilman Highland, seconded by Councilman Carden to adopt Ordinance No. 284 on second reading by title only; motion carried 5:0 by roll call vote. CC 03/28/95 Page 12 8. ORDINANCE NO. 285 - Amending the official City zoning map by rezoning real property located at 6000 San Palo from RSF-Z to CT (ZC 94004) Staff recommendation: (1) Motion to adopt on second reading by title only MOTION: By Councilman Highland, seconded by Councilman Carden to adopt Ordinance No. 285 on second reading by title only; motion passed 5:0 by roll call vote. D. COMMITTEE REPORTS (The following represent ad hoc or standing committees. Informative status reports will be given, as felt necessary.): 1. S.L.O. Council of Governments(COG) -Councilman Carden reported that COG will meet April 5, 1995 to take action on the Highway 41 issue, discuss the "supervote" concept and review the Citizens Transportation Advisory Committee. Councilman Luna asked if the Highway 41 agenda item was a public hearing. Councilman Carden explained that it is listed as a special agenda item. Henry Engen reported that public testimony was closed at the meeting of March 29th. 2. City/School Committee - Henry Engen reported that the committee had met on March 16th and discussed issues relating to skateboarding. He also mentioned that the committee received an update on the "Safe Routes to School" program. The next meeting will be May 18, 1995 in the City Manager's Office. 3. County Water Advisory Board/Nacimiento Water Purveyors Advisory Group - Councilman Highland reported that the Water Advisory Board will meet on April 5th. 4. Finance Committee - The City Manager reported that the committee had me and agreed to bring back an interim investment policy at the next regular Council meeting. 5. Air Pollution Control District - Councilman Carden announced that the APCD meets March 29th, but noted that he will not be able to attend because he is participating in "Youth in Government Day" (same day). He also mentioned that because of potential conflicts of interest and time constraints, he is finding it difficult to continue serving. He added that the alternate, Councilman Highland, is not permitted to vote. It was noted that the City Selection Committee will not meet until July and therefore a special meeting has been called at the request of the Mayor to designate Councilman Highland as the voting delegate. CC 03/28/95 . Page 13 6. Upper Salinas River Coordinated Resource Management and Planning Committee - Councilman Highland reported that the committee had met a week ago and are still working on the Water Resources Management Plan. E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION: 1. City Clerk: 1996 General Municipal Election (verbal) Lee Price reported that, in 1993, an election pilot program was enacted by the State legislature which moves the statewide primary from June to March. The pilot program is for 1996 only, unless extended. The City Clerk noted that Atascadero, by ordinance, consolidates with the County of San Luis Obispo and conducts its general municipal elections concurrently with the Statewide Primary. She asked the City Council to consider whether they wish to hold the 1996 election in March or in November and summarized the pros and cons. Fiscal impacts are not fully known, she reported, and discussions are on-going with the County Clerk-Recorder. There was consensus to gather more information; the Clerk will bring back options for consideration. 2. City Manager Andy Takata provided an overview of the agenda items for the next meeting and reminded all of Youth in Government Day to be held the following day. He also mentioned that the City Council would meet in a Joint Study Session with the Cities of San Luis Obispo and Paso Robles and the Boards of Directors for the Atascadero Mutual Water Company and the Templeton Community Services District on Tuesday, April 11 , 1995 at 7:00 p.m. for purposes of discussing the Nacimiento Pipeline Project. The Mayor adjourned to Closed Session at 10.53 p.m. F. CLOSED SESSION: 1. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR: Negotiator: City Manager Employee Organization: Management Bargaining Unit 2. EXISTING LITIGATION: Name of case: City of Atascadero v. Orange County CC 03/28/95 Page 14 Closed Session was adjourned at 11:14 p.m. The City Council gave direction to staff; ino settlements were reached. MINUTES RECORDED AND PREPARED BY: LEE PRICE, City Clerk Attachment: Exhibit A (Carden) CC 03/28/95 Page 15 CC 3/28/95 EXHIBIT A Page 1 Recommendations submitted by Councilman Carden Subject: Economic Development Element Recommendation: Page x-1, para. B, line 45-46 Delete (replace with ERT recommendation) B. Municipal Policies to Promote & Sustain Economic Development Page x-2, lines 27-29 (replace the following actions with ERT recommendation) The following policies are hereby adopted by the City Council of Atascadero as part of the Economic Development Element of the General Plan to improve the local economy: Page x-3, line 9 Replace "...friendly..." with "...oriented..." Page x-3, line 11 Replace "...friendly..." with "...oriented..." Page x-3, line 16 Replace "...friendly..." with "...oriented..." Page x-4, line 11 Add: Goal - Expand employment opportunities for those Atascadero residents who possess a high school education or less. Objective - Create specific job training, vocational and educational programs which will increase the employability of our population who possess a high school degree or less in order to increase their employability and respective household median income. Program - In conjunction with Cuesta College, the Private Industry Council, the Atascadero Unified School District and the City of Pas Robles, support the establishment of jos training which is specific to local manufac- turing and employment needs. CC 3/28/95 • EXHIBIT A Page 2 Recommendations submitted by Councilman Carden Subject: Economic Development Element Page x-4, line 26 through Delete entire sentence (replace w/R. Johnson's recommended wording) Page x-4, line 37 Replace"...fiscally possible..."with "...fiscally prudent..." Page x-5, line 50-52 Delete Page x-6, line 1-13 Delete Page x-6, line 15 Delete the words "Within this boundary..." and begin sentence with, "The community should..." Page x-6, line 20 Place period after "...department stores." Delete remainder of sentence Page x-6, line 50-52 Recommend possible deletion covered under general direction of revitalization of Downtown core area. Page x-7, line 1-3 See above comment. (Follow-up note: I am in agreement with Ray Johnson's comments.] CC 3/28/95 EXHIBIT A Page 3 Recommendations submitted by Councilman Carden Subject: Economic Development Element The following text may be added to the text of the element or as an addendum. I would recommend an end date of 1998 to 2000 for these incentives. I would also say these are guidelines to be administered by staff; any requests greater than these shall be sent to the Council by staff for review and approval/disapproval or modification. I wouldn't want to institute a General Plan update or any such thing because these incentives are included. These are intended to be a starting point for discussion. Page x-3, para. 4, line 47 Add the following: i Goal - Increase the number of manufacturi4 jobs by the year 2005 Objective - Create an average of [50-1001 new manufacturing/industrial jobs annually, of which 50% would most likely be for the residents of Atascadero. Create skilled jobs. Of the new manufacturing jobs, 25% will be skilled jobs which pay a minimum of (535,000/year] to be indexed against the CPI as of 1994. Increase the gross square footage of new manufacturing/industrial space by at least (15,000 sq. ft./yr.] Program The City will aggressively encourage private development of the following locations for industrial/manufacturing development: CC 3/28/95 EXHIBIT A Page 4 Recommendations submitted by Councilman Carden Subject: Economic Development Element The following incentives will be provided to "new" development: • A density bonus of will be provided to those manufacturers who meet or exceed the above stated objectives. • A reduction in fees up to (25%] but not to exceed (25%] of the estimated increase in new revenue streams calculated over a (4-year] window. • The above apply to new facilities which occur before the year 2000. Program + The City will aggressively pursue the retention and expansion of existing manufacturers within the City of Atascadero. + Implement quarterly meetings between local manufacturers, the City Manager and future economic development exec- utive to provide input to strategies which would improve the business environment of existing manufacturing firms. • Provide a density bonus of up to [_%] of manufacturer expands prior to the year 2000. + Provide a [_%] reduction in fees if the salary levels meet the City target and expansion occurs prior to the year 2000. All fee discounts apply to the first (350,000 sq. ft.] increase of combined new and expansion of existing facility. CC 3/28/95 EXHIBIT A Page 5 Recommendations submitted by Councilman Carden Subject: Economic Development Element Pge x-6, line 25 Add: 5. Retention Goal - The City shall aggressively pursue the retention and expansion of existing retail and commercial services within the City of Atasca- dero. The following incentives will be provided to existing retail/commercial businesses who expand within the City of Atascadero befog the year 2000: • A 20% increase in signage. • A 25% decrease in parking require- ments. (This may be increased to 100% based upon current square foot- age of sales area, i.e. laydown yard space that may be covered.) • A (35%] reduction in fees for the first 25% increase in square footage and/or [20%0] decrease in fees on the remain- der up to 50% expansion. x-6, line 24, under in-fill Those retail/commercial who are "targeted" for infill and meet the requirements set forth in 1. a & b, above, will be provided the follow- ing incentives: • The use will be allowed/pre-approved or a C.U.P. requirement will be waived. • parking density bonus of % will* A p g ty (— ] be allowed. REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item: A-2 1 Through: Micki Korba, City Treasurer Meeting Date: 4/25/95 From: Brad Whitt Finance Director " Y� �l SUBJECT: Treasurer's Report - March, 1995 RECOMMENDATION• Council review and accept. Attachment: Treasurer's Report, March, 1995 CITY OF ATASCADERO TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF MARCH (Unaudited) GENERAL FISCAL ACCOUNT INVESTMENTS AGENT TOTAL BEGIN. TREASURER'S $278,583 6,278,687 503,369 $7,060,639 BALANCE RECEIPTS 590,646 -0 -0- 590,646 DISBURSEMENTS < 762,545> -0- < 31095> < 765,640> TRANSFERS IN 200,000 -0- 200,000 TRANSFERS OUT -0- <200,000> -0- < 200,000> OTHER -0- -0- -0- -0- BALANCE $306,684 6,078,687 500,274 $6,885,645 DEPOSITS IN 113,069 TRANSIT CHECKS OUTSTANDING <229,031> ADJUSTMENTS <28> ADJUSTED TREASURER'S BALANCE $6,769,655 CITY OF ATASCADERO -- � MURIEL C. KORBA City Treasurer a:treas-rpt #40 000Fs`�Z ALL FUNDS - GENERAL ACCOUNTIINVESTMENTS RESERVED UNRESERVED FUNDS CASH ( 1) CASH (2) eneral Fund Pooled Cash $ $ 784,327 as Tax Fund Pooled Cash 54,887 evelopment Fee Pooled Cash 21,550 Donations Pooled Cash 5,236 A.D. #4 - Reserve Pooled Cash 50,497 Zoo Enterprise Pooled Cash < 34,960> Payroll Trust Pooled Cash < 71,540> TRAN Repayment Pooled Cash 1, 163 95 CDBG Pooled Cash 5,699 93 STBG-688 Pool Cash 2,028 93 EDBG-268 Pool Cash 970 Dial-A-Ride Pooled Cash 81,339 WasteWater Fund Pooled Cash 1,803,667 Lake Park Pavil. Pooled Cash < 12,501> Aquatics Pooled Cash < 17,027> Recreation Pooled Cash < 71,807> Tree Plant Fund Pooled Cash 34,467 Tree Assn Fund Pooled Cash < 63> Sidewalk Trust Pooled Cash 50,477 Emergency Services Pooled Cash 8,657 Police Training Pooled Cash < 2,826> Weed Abatement Pooled Cash 31,839 A.D. #3Redemptn. Pooled Cash 4,057 A.D. #4 Redemptn. Pooled Cash 16,094 A.D. #5 Redemptn. Pooled Cash 2,683 Camino Real Redm Pooled Cash <56,287> 2 Street A.D. Redemptn Pooled Cash 35,197 anta Rosa AD #7 <107> 89 COP Debt Svc Pooled Cash 75,602 Capital Project Pooled Cash < 13,300> ' 89 COP Const. Pooled Cash -0- Pol. Dev. Fees Pooled Cash 1,339 Fire Dev. Fees Pooled Cash 54, 888 P&R Dev. Fees Pooled Cash 22,069 Drain. Dev. Fees Pooled Cash 400,428 Amapoa-Tec. Fee Pooled Cash 2361,801 Public Works Pooled Cash 16,,508 St. Main. Dist. Pooled Cash 48,065 TDA Non-Transit Pooled Cash 131, 120 Sewer Facilities Capital 1,940,929 Camino Real Const. Pooled Cash 321,630 Las Encinas Const. Pooled Cash 145,966 3F Meadows Const. Pooled Cash 110,821 Santa Rosa A.D. #7 Pooled Cash 48,799 TOTAL ALL FUNDS 177,698 $6,091,683 CASH WITH FISCAL AGENT Camino Real Resr Cash $ 207,378 92 St. A.D. Resv Cash 45,864 Wastewater Fund Cash 48,794 4 amino Real Redm. Cash 340 2 St. A.D. Redm. Cash 45 9 COP Debt Svc. Cash 197, 853 TOTAL WITH FISCAL AGENT $ 500,274 TOTAL RESTRICTED AND UNRESTRICTED CASH $6,769,655 INVESTMENTS TIME DEPOSITS CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT, SAVINGS, AND LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND 3/31/95 INTEREST TIME DEPOSITS: AMOUNT RECEIVED (4) Orange County Investment Pool/IRAN $ 54,354(6) $29,354 Orange County Investment Pool 3,673,005(6) 115,021 Local Agency Investment Fund 2,351,328(3) 2,442 TOTAL TIME DEPOSITS $6,078,687 146,980 Mid-State Interest Received 5,338 TOTAL INTEREST RECEIVED $152,318(5) Notes: (1) Reserved Fund Cash is specified for City debt service. (2) Unreserved Fund cash can be used for normal operations of the City. (3) The City must repay the $1,300,000. Tax Revenue Anticipation Note (IRAN) from this fund including $59,634 interest at 4.60% per annum by July, 1995. (4) March, 1995 interest yields were as follows: Orange County Not available LAIF 5.76% Mid-State 2.63% (5) This is actual amount deposited to City accounts through March 31, 1995 and does not reflect interest amounts accrued but not received. Also not included above are interest amounts earned in Fiscal Agent or County accounts, which are used for bond retirement purposes. (6) On December 6th, Orange County filed a Chapter 9 bankruptcy with the courts. The City had $5,082,641 in the Orange County Investment Pool (OCIP) as of that date. The City withdrew $1,355,282 from the OCIP on January 26, 1995. No interest has been posted to the City's OCIP account since September, 1994. 000(11"1 REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL Meeting Date: 04/25/95 CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item: A-3 Through : Andy Takata, City Manager From: Bradford Whitty, Finance Director SUBJECT: Payment of Audited Bills and Payroll for the month of March , 1995 . RECOMMENDATION: Approve certified City accounts payable, payroll and payroll vendor checks for the month of March , 1995 . Attached , for City Council review .and approval , are the following : A. Payroll Period End 03/03/95 Ck . #20218-20357 $127 ,084.01 Period End 03/17/95 Ck . #20391 -20527 130, 660. 73 B. Special Payroll Dated 03/09/95 Ck . #20361 -20362 650.89 Dated 03/15/95 Ck . #20387 294. 69 Dated 03/22/95 Ck . #20437 VOID ( 568. 48) Dated 03/23/95 Ck . #20532 150. 18 C. Payroll Vendors Dated 03/06/95 Ck . #20190-20194 33 , 149 . 74 Dated 03/09/95 Ck . #20366-20382 64, 570 . 65 Dated 03/24/95 Ck . #20525-20550 54, 326.09 Dated 03/31 /95 Ck . #20727-20731 33, 329 . 85 D . Accounts Payable Ck . #20379-49773 353 , 147 . 23 The undersigned certifies that the attached demands have been released for payment in the total amount of $796, 795.58 and have been reviewed in conformity with the budget of the City of Atascadero and that funds are available for these demands . Dated RA FORD WHITTY, Fi an e Director �pproved by the City Council at a meeting held LEE PRICE , City Clerk 1 n T T T 1 n .< S S S°9 S '9 9 9 S S ZJ SI S 9 S S 9 '9 S 51 S tS 9 S S 9 S r9 S S S 51 5)t4 S a 9'9 9 61 S ^ S T.9^ S .a 9 1 ?•'1 b D J A J D J b b A A '� J A D A b D A A .b A J D D N a A J 1 J b A b t. A b A A A b S J A A A .>' A '•J i t ;� S S b•O •0'0••0 �O '0'0 '0'0 'O'0'0 'r)'0'0 '0'0'O '0 -0'4� -0 'C -C '0 b'0 't'0 -O '0'0'0 '0'0 'O 10`^- `O 0?9 I 3 '0 :7 D A _ 'q'q `•q "•� L4tgLq tq Cq LI Cn;.�Ll tri Ln Lq 'I" 'n Vl '•1 tq L:toAA3a D DA -SAA Jb .? A DJ .?b ?D .> `.W I - '7 \ \ S •:J•J N N tJ?J�•'j ;.,. ,.•'.• ••'r Y'-+9 S ;7 s 9 9<J 9 S 9 '•0'O'O '0 b�O'0 't'0 'O O 9 'J7 'b� :)O7 D x V V' V 1 .0 - C 9 LRD W r.J S .O W V P 0 A W 1J Y 51.'0 M V.a,0 A W e'0 33 V T Cn b w DJ Y'O W ->•'0 ! -' O 'i1 W 'O'0 5=. 9 S S 9 9 9 9 SV a St S 9 S 9 9 m 9 9 9 51 9 S-.9 S1 S.�l S S �7 9 9 9 9 9 9 5 S a S S.9 5 5 9 9 9 9 .} Stn 1A 1 t.,I i!L!*! W W W'+!W W(.!✓!W W W W W W W ✓i W W'.sl W'1 it W it•I rA ;'I W W W W W W W W W W W W A W I.7 I .J ;... � \ \\\ \\\_\_\\ \\ \ \� 1010 \� \_\ \\ I w .G V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V.V V V V V V V V V V V.V V V IJ 13 V V V V V W W CAA fA b I :t-0 � �+ 'o a 3'o'o 10 'o<o -0 -O'o 'o d'o,o'o'o '7't.e'o 'a'0 r'0 'o 'o 'o 10 10,010'a'o'o 'a w.0 1010 1 i; 0Lq C4(n Lq0 Lq 0 Lq 0 N CR VI L9 Lq Cri L9 L9 Lq 0 Lq Lq Lq Ln rq Lg0Lq Lq Cn 0t•1 Lq ti CA Lq 000 Lq 0 Lq Lq Ln 0 Lq Ll Lq 1 1) 77 <nY+>b 'z/Xa71>k Y1wW D D D D D D D 3> <'c DD D <DDDDDDAD DDDR«.'= TTc.--imT i < Vr- Hr' o n -!ZXzD-qZI-1 --41>n- :> , D :z> ,j i- mrr- >< Tm ' ;:) nooV 1 : s �• •' PJ a 53 Ca 9 S 9 c.J• T :J 9 S S YJ Cv.•• Cv 9 c J c V ZI-• S 9 C'tD T S 1 0. V .]. _n.: •... ,+ A W 03 Lq TJ N:•+N -a *'. +-` 't 33'T A r ;•J"11 A T•.)to C:i T a J`u a W:• a.b 1 a -1 1 �y D 7 r x w A A -1> DD DD ] A +3� D.-TI NC:r 1--+ -1 a -1-1 -4 -4MMMaXMr ! 'ZInx =0mzxn1 qtr. aD z= z w D -f M -f D D D A D? ?> D 0 3':� ;11 'r;g r• <x M N T 0'-1 0 0 T I .-r ? mzm zl7-I O -•f :n 14 In :n 03J)'fn W T..3 TI T TD.T. •lzt%-iTzt� 1 z A l D D n 7 I; D Tf ? ^ -f C)3 •. 2' -1 n n7 n. n T I M,T:-+•-a w z -C z."1 D o. M m x O D 1 01 n0 D.m ;n -i O roDc ADA D AD'D :> '�tT..U)nn -f.Aw T. SJ ?"I-< 3 1 3 U3 T. 3 71 rmwwm D2-i�2' -iz7 tvzj [7 t: Z. 7 D `0 1 0 7A S xm3> m 30 HT 1 N : m Tit - In A In D .-1--f N'-t n m m IV T m m M Dz z.z, D x::1 c T U3 t, 3 U)x :7 J i .-t y T T -i W m z T D -1 T n -i-1 T T X T W T 73 T J) - •" i n.ri T :1 D-1 c ZI I D N 0 r 0 *J)0 3 to D 0.. O 0 O 0 0 7 0 3 'V=-rn:A E D n D "?i _m T D z 11 ;t 1 p r; 7 .7£ 7 W m 3 if)m C)D.Zt�.. m.-;. D "*1 is J <-CI m ?z+ .-•r-f -!a:TS ! '. :p A ?•^ �•- M Z T;n.-t m r.. O�+ :II 2' C z..^t 'al r-r D : J)j- :�D T - --in �m m T T i f nDW-0 HZTD aD -I camr o ` o.rN !m7 -10 H mMMmw ! D 3 -!� nn-1X 7-0c iHF_' D T. T.A-i z "� ITI 3 '0)n 1. rf� D D H 3 rn H t7 c'T1 0)in 0 3 D -4 n z= ;QH .W?I D 1 t�• m 3 in -'0 En Dm DH -m D -i,+�000 o --I cODfn ! FTI z z z Z. t 1 -1 z r m CO c N T 73 r--1 C m T W z -4 1 3 TI T m n -! z O-1 m• r UI '4 IV T-^1 t7 1 O < 7.a z . 0Z - m ra '0 1 3 , T 0 `.?' v z m`":x D U) n < 2• 0 -<D O T I It s•: m D n U) O -•I n I-1 U) m U)H O 1 =r •;�'' -i t7 'I X •• n < D H-f TI L 1 .. .. 0 .. .. � 0)Cn -f n.11 W n 1 Z �... G7 --1 ,. 0 "v'-'i f cl n .. .. .. 1 T ! -i t7 0 VI DD DD DDDDDDDDDDD D D D D D 3? 11 > D D DDDDDD DDDDD DDDDDDD i. 'f N 1 3 n t7 1 to -h r..D OrIt tz az M to t+ N } D 4 WN 01 1 9 f, W 9 t• f 3 'i i N CL 0• N '0 W N N tJ Lq Lq © Cn W N I•+ OD t•+ Y W 9 W b W 1 O O 103 tD ar '• W'O :a.V f•J '0-b r W b Lq W N" P 10 N 10 OD a-•P P W - 'a 0, P.9 W W 10 V tJ V V 9 9 W V V I •' N Cq t0 -S E4 '0 A tq 0, b Mt. a-• 'O 0 I•+9 V T P 17 9 :i 0• Lq. 9 W 9°lf b FJ i•+W 9.b %,1 0 0 0 0"Cq 1 3 N O O � I h It 999Y'C W �+O Lq Cq}-•9PNC11PCq WLg99f96'P 99 tS''1903 P'O A'W'IJ 0 W, t- *W fJ W, 'M '0 W, o 0 0 0 G y9 t99 VIS)999 IS 99 P IS 99 b w 9;J 09099 oW 5151M9WA 0Aw0 W W'0999 W9961P 09 1 ' v ! d o I c� rr i i O 099990w999999.9999999999 --019 LID SS'999is)9'tJ 99999.m m 999 m 9 w 9 m 1 3 1 rt 1 i 1 z W I tD ty. t• W m r I rt P f, 10 (A N N ++I+. tJ L9 r n IS) Cq W N a+03 1+ Y W 9 W b W t W'0 .V PJ-O.0 r W f. 0 t•J.I-•I-+ Cl,'O N b a O,. P P W l- 0 P P 9 CO W'O V t•J V V 51 IS 03 V V 1 D W I-' 10 b Lt P N A co b 1,1'13 Lf1 r W V P P W 9 W 0'r Cq S IA F W b b Cq f•J�W.19 bV Lq 9 9 9 Cn Lq 1 3 - 'O W 9.00go -0C)'wcgO'Cq WCg9t999P i O 999t - �'a@99WP'OAWVS)6'I-`WNa999't1999Cn95) ! 99t9 V 9 99199t900100mbNyo4 J9t4969a403149r. 61W ACq•b99OD0310 WOO(AS WOO, WIS 1 Z ) ' D D D D D'D D D.D D Ia D D D D D D D D D D 10 D D D D M.D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D'13 T t < I n ` -f-i -i-4-4 -I-i-1-!.-1-1 -I-i•'•!-•i-'i-f-t"'I.-4-1--I-i -1-1-1 -f-r-i-4-i--t-I-1-I.-1-A-1-f-i-4--1 'R 0 D T d D H H i..tp 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w c o H T p t7 i n "s33a3 aa3.a.3333333.3 3333333 =03233' 3333323333333. z (n--I t7 i x' DDDDD DDDD'-aDDDDDDD DDD pDDDDD DDD DDDDDDDDDDDDD �r-1H(nnt7 a , --I-i -f -i-f-i:i-i -i--i-4-1-f-i --I-1-f-i-i-{-4-i-1 -i-i-1 -i.--i-1-i-i-i-i-I"f-{-i-i -f -10 x x I b (.. HH H HH ....HH HH.H H HH HH HH H. HHN H. .HHa-i HH HHH1-4 H 0' z'n mm I N 0n0nn0 C)00 CI)nnnCI)00000nnnnn0cl0n0nnc1nnnnnnnnC)LI'g0Dann I to 0 zr T 77, 1 n G1 ,r'"I Gl 4'1 Gl ci 1-i1 Gt C'l ri1 ft G7 ci7 G3 G7 L7 al ,n-G•1 ti1 c1 cl .fl-.I G7 in cl v 0 in(,l 6.1 cl in 41 0 0 riI G1 0 G1 0 t• -u \\ I RIM ITI fm ?Imnm nuimmmmmm maim mmM maim mmm mmmmm m mmm l*imm mt•JD W-1-Pz7- i F+ z z z z z z z z z z z Z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z x z 2 z z z 9 -<D c D.c3 o o mn1m mmmmmmn-!mnmmmmmm.mrlmmmr-1mmmmmr•1m-Ti mmmnmmmmmm TrzT -1 --11 rt S. TTT 7+TTTT T73TAr.TT7CI TTZaT T. T T- T 7r T.T ?'TTT :?aT 7.ITT7?.TTTTT �I Orbl i :•' DD DDDDDDDDDDDD DDDD DDD DD D D D DD D D D D D D D D D D D D D c r L� EOn I O nt•-1 'n - --t-i -I-1 -i -4 -i-!-i -4-1-•! -i-1•i -1 -•I-I-i -1-i-1 -f-i-i -{-t -i-t-i--I -i-{-1--I-i -i-1-1 -i -1-1-1 Z r Tl --1 N m 1 ; -4 tl D mmmal mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm-mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmH H'llam-11 r 0 t1 t✓ v e t=l t:1 )t"0 tv 0 fzt t$tv 0 tj tv 1-1 7 t-v C 1-1-0 C C7 tZI C7 C t=F 0 t I"0 td 0 'V 11 c m a b 1 Y+m 0\rTTi t:l I .. nnnnnnn 3rynnnnnnc)nnnnnnn..^. nnnnnnnnc7nnnnnnnnnTxty D c ! T2 xxxT- x22xxxxx xxxS2x 2S_T r2x xxxTx xxxxxSxTxxa\ htlT m i mm mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmf;mmmmnlmmmmmmmm Tzc7 1 v 9 000000000000nnn.:n000000n0000000C)0nnnnnn000n -UM al1- 1 - n 7 7 7 7 77777.7777777•.77.7,7777.":77 . 7777777777,7777 7 D -0 --17 r i D 0 000. `� S I 7 cz ?1 m s S .v S .D S s s S s m s s s m m s s m s 9 S n 9 > S W!!, 9 s s S m s s 9 s s n.9 S'4 �J m 9 S 5+S I z n ,• , .'� A A J J J A J A J A A A A AAA R A J A A J A •..s J A A .'� J > J A . A A A J A % 21. J A J A A 9 A J 1 - 7 •^s ,t7 0 •0 •O -0 0`0 �0-0 -0,0 �6�0 �0'0'0'0 '0'0'0'0�c 0 '0'0 '0'0'0'0•0�0 -t7 SCJ`0 -0-0�0 �0�0-0�O�0,0 -0�0 -0 -0�0 1 s # •n Z-7'n .,i.l ,n •n Cn Cn Ln . •n Cn 0�l 0 'n to cn C+�l.n C' '1 .. . 1 .'# + ";Li .rt l'? *q ':Cfl '9 Cl.. .fl.n-r Cr: { - \ \ t� V V V Ja ?a Ja ?-Ja a Ja a Ja la �:l Cn•�t L+#L4 LI'-I -1�1_? J A � J .4. b, .1 A D 9 w sl w �t W A W w .l it:J Nj!i N, I _ ^< �- S - 2 i Aw !Jr 9 '07o'1 aCnA w tJ t+ s.p M Va 0 b,w Uj- SAOOV 0,0 AW PJB 5 003V 0, Wt-, s,0 V':• I 7 ',! "! S smss 99S m s@ s m s in m m S s 2 9 m s m s . m 9s;9 _q Ss ± M;m nSs 'S. aS .9-S) mm sS i T "1LI s WWAWWWWAWWW''WwW wW1.1W CJ CA W(A'A W W CA W W W W'..1 W CA W W W W tA'AW W ',1 W.WW W •1W V V V V V V V V V V V V\i V V V V V V\I V\I V V V V V V V V V I t -{ `0 W d '1010 � '0�0`O�0�0 �0�0�0 �0�0`0 �0`0�0 �0�O�C vJ�0 •0 -0'0•C '0 10 10 10 10 10 10 •0 10•C 10 10 10 v] ^D +! `0•C 1 +" Cl Ln CA Cn_n Cn to 0 0 Cn"Cfl A Cn LI Cn to to ti Cn tl Ln Cl;_n_'_n _I Ln ul i*9 Ln !1 Cn to to to N Ln to'r Cq to rl Cn :-n ji i x x 2 x 2 .1 G1 G1< 1;1 .L'1'ti m TI< 'tl m m TI TI TI ?1 m?I m b" b <t7 ( M D D D D -{T 7 0:n'r; D D 7.+7 0 0 J 0:1'n D D T .y D 00-+m 0 m D D D T T T 0 0 J^3 r T x L' Y I ^ m H D H S D N T D A••+0 r 3+?.+2 .;7£ .^_f`7 D< H n-« T-.-t tri=E a D -O rt?:D D > I +t am Cm 'SS Qm -vsssss -15 s Ss s ^>:s3n sa_7 7s,`Ya^J G1 s`c1 s CJS IM,SS9 'S 'J '7 1 ^ J W :J w- -•r r pJ u r tJ. r+ - {.J. A _ ?J*J^J J N _ ',.+ J - 1 ''0 77x ;0 + -1;1T-gl7100-TI -n -n tl ri rrT TI tt .T .?1x 7j -iti7 'l"Iv0 i7 �nf+on0nn i � ?iD7n:7 -47711. Rim DDT 00 00G17DD • -m?>`'-D,-+"i „I:i1pD7!4710 00�0r22T2 1 +, rlm"+-r Sr ZTDCT Orr -(T7 0 J)(V D77 n0ax-<x c X D,0mmD DD 1 T VZ-4ZW ty7 2-+- :7T-f-C22'rl 071.177 to 3 zi mr=f '17ND2 Z Z ?t 1 2 { < D-i 3D:1 D < Dmm V In-q D > ":r t 0 9 all -< -fD '-t -rHC -4 Z z D 1 SoLr C 0-4mD2 'nZamm-< Xzmx-w x4 �rD>_ -ITi = n nr :T'T 1 3 S x a: fi •1D -4.1 m-4 -•40 OLA<TC 7!'--+ 7- ty c, -4 i.7D -< :-i-i2 £r - r- T I "J TD xD -.1.-+ '--+7, Om "T•-r-1 T .-1 :1T T -< z_ 7 D CD <Ln o Y+ -10-iDm D I '`IEDf Ti ?1 DG'1'A:JO0 7x4 "'1! 2 7• '-e.7:30 Z-C" :n w = zT -< D m7z q ? x- 47 bD HZT r aSAr7M ZO 7, V x -4zv 13>4X?t0 n niz m x m TI Z o{ -I = < :n n 3'0 r m m 0 J)J T i m£-i 1.l 0> T•• r T x I T zm -gx -4x ?+D -i1+-1mn iii pZZ < Tz0;7'-t-IDNx ?1'> z = ?lC 1 Z -i ? `- \ -4T0< 0:0 Nrm" "m -iz: x-En _ zxzrC-ITIM0 0 -iSil 1 0-. £N N-1ZmQ• xrm > z rmD c1�mr nc1m x+ <-+CC H + z Dm I w H-1 \ 77T CmTr 0 vDN+ 0 NH D -i mni D' X 7,CT ZD tx'-+L-1. mT<D 2 z -n nxrr NOi1i I -I mT mDm-4 Nr 77z(n N"HN -0tyEN NmD m '•�N i S ODS �- nm D DT " -Vtn 770-4 t7 N 1 O 0 v--1 Nr Tin Hv +z+T m Z Z U) -4 0 470" T D -000 Z rl "O -< M.rrI T Ez < 2 1 h Z T O T S n n'- T _rl T --1 D Ti H D 1 > 77 Z z v C7 4T v v i,? Z .. 1 a n �..: T �. 0 LA D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D A D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D I (P. It i 3 t7 -n O L: It U 0, i w DGIN m .a W W CA N t� PJ 11. W im+ { T I N tl PPm0]-0Cn t, 1i1 F' " P W *+ PJ A A AaP 0>`J A V 17 O 3 -t { W@FJ�OVInV MVAAPGtt•JhJ ' ,LuLnJ3 OIAWt-+"Om t�J1OP VNW VANCntJ i C N tnCnN 't t1. -1 0ACn VmGn V@ V W Nt-`Cn 4JNA W V07 'J 0om(A A0 .t�V(A to Vt•1.Pmm b 0 .P 1 N 3 O t rt rt . V t1.+9mmmCfl@mm@aomt1.CflA@ V4:0p61Pt1. C�i�'+ @m@mO.h1.CJ@ WCfltFmm•0 W0•@ P@�•`V 1 in 00 mm 6)m O1ss m m mV Vu m CO 0 to m Wt+t•J 0, V W @ mIN,.61 :T 00. P 07 m m m m M N A s@P@ A@ 1 I T b 1 ty O i Ln t ! n i I D i { (" @@ m@ m m KS,"@ m m@@ m tp m@@ m m m s@ m u m m m@ m S@ s@@@@@@ m@ Lp @ m m@@ m m s I r- m m m m@ m -.m m m @mmm m m@ m m m OW m m m m S m m s r9 m m @mom Ow m m m m m m m@ { 1 Hr I z k«. 1 t t 10 Cn t•1. t1. W H I `0 W W Cfl V t-+ W pp r-• t1. PP t1. A V I C•o• @AO t.1_9 N W ISI N)`0V 0211 @ VAAPGA PJ fl(A CR-Qr1_11 W 03J W(A •O@tJ OPV W W V AiJ Cn t) I D FJ V S1-13mm -h Cn V @Cn V@ V W tnwtn 11.Ix GJ V0) r•J 01 IS Cn+-' APJA V W 000 V t•1.P m 0 x 00 A P 1 3 V N m m m m Cn @ N 11 j J M w w V N 07 @ P t•1. 0 V m °C m@ m@ S h1.@ m N N@ m@•O W P m m P@ a• V I O �'�. Q7@ m@ @(p Am 0 m@ Wm V 1-+ Cn mm @rNP Vm A@ Sm S00mPw m@ @mtflN A@ @01 9x0 1 ::5 I ,t D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D l n � r_rrCCr_' CC CCCCCC CCCCCC''-CCCC+- r=CC �CCCCCC{'-0000000 CCCCC 1 � " -i -i -i-1-4-i-i--4 -1•i -i -1-i-i -1-�-1-1--1-1-4-1-4-i-1-1 -4-i-4--1-4-f-t--1-i--1-4-i-i-f-i-1-i-i-i-I -1-1-1 ( m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 n S 33322 :x2 2302233332333222333232322233323223' 33322233 1 x V°;•. D D D Ir D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D I>D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D I �,e,• -i--1 -i-1-4-1 -4•-i -4-i-4 -i-4-4 -1-1-4 -1-4-1 -4--4-i-1 -4-4 -1--4-4-1-1 -1 --r-1-1-1--1--1 -4-I-i-1-1 -4 -4-A -1-4--I I C HH HH HH HH HH HHHH HH HH .. .... HH ..HH HH HH HH HH HHHH HH HH HHH 11D t'••:.': nonoon nnnnnoon nnnnnnnoon nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnonor) l +n G1 G"I l;.1 41 V, f,1 41 4-+ G'1;t G1 r;t G1 G'1 f,1 L'1+:1 G-t C G'1 G1 G1 G1 G1 G1 L,,t 41 4'1 G1 C G1 G1 C1 C r:t G1 C G1 Ct G'1 C'1 n G'1 G1 G1+1 G1 G1 I •i .•... 11mrlmmmmmmmmmnrrmrnm(Ti m:Ti mill Mr1lInIrl ,i;ylminmmM"I!Immmmm'*Irimr*liqmmrnm Y Z Z Z z 7 Z Z Z z 2 Z Z Z z Z z Z Z Z Z 7 Z Z 2 Z:Z 7_ 7. T Z Z Z t Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z 1 rim r11n"l m m In m m m m rl m m ri rl mm m r+mmm -"1m�Iwr; til mF—I1-9 m M m rl m:-i m m m m m Ill m m I .+ i,. T TJ71 TT7J 1�T TTx+ T T T_ TTTTTTTTT : iJJ+ :f! T t' JJ 7? ?,TTT J.+7!T. T?+i x+T T;-x ;" T xT 1 *' D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D 1, D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D 1 0 n H T7 --i-4 1 O -4 t7 D III m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m rim rl m m rn m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m 1 r 0 t cnadcrat7rsr1vt+ t7t7vr7r�r) r7r.oCr:pt: � tjrjrjr 1, r, rjv0e7atytyv•9aat-ptit=ptvt=%1V 1 iam nnnnnnnnnCI)nnnnnnnnnnnnncin nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnl .• . .. T Tx x22 xS 2x2 xTT2xx - xTx Tx T- T T x 2 x x x 22 __22222 222= 22 x 22= 1 7 mmm mmrlfilmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmnmmmmiilnnimmrlmmrlmmmmmrlmmmmrrim I D -<m nnoOnnon non noon nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnl -4 n@ 777 7 7 7 77 777 77•.7777 777777777777777. 77,7777•. 7. 77777 77 77•. 7 1 D t7 PJ t/ '7 1 TTT 9 t D r C T Cn I `1 `C -4 1 z n •• •• •• J A b J 9 A J A L .P J i % 7 p 9 9 T o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0'o 'C 0 0 0 ov; a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 oah •a`o '0`0 '0 `0•010,0,0 ,010 'C10 o•e -ate i a � Aa T O•Pa ?- J T TaJ a a7- aaJ� aA?�J� aa, 3" ra -q J1 c9 'n Cl L-,u --,•a cn cn •a•v •n Ln Li r`cl •,v?L- ,�r� 1 Z -I � \\ N'J!•J?J10 � Lq.. .y •� 9@9955993'75 00b0�0 '•0 �0�0�0 �O .b OJI�JJ 71 J) J1 X00.'V V V V V I .D " S.'ri W 'J�'' 9.0 17 V JT CnAW tJ"9109 V ?,CnD rA QJ 1)`ODV ?•LnD W?Jv .a.ON V'T Cn A;� ?•.)t-+ 9�O J]V aCn I 'S O W W 6 SS •S7 IS'SOSS 9VMW0M09@9@5aW MS J� S'99995761 4Q@90909@S1 S13j99 I = O 1. fi •! w• •, •WWW WWwWWWWWWWWWWW rA'A CAW W •1 W '1 w iI W W'i '4:4A W W W tAA W WW W WW I v \\\ \\\\ \\ \\ \\\\ \_ \\ \ \\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \\\ \\\ \\\ \ \ I d V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V \\\\\ \\\ \\\ \ \\ \ \\ \ \\ \ \\`. \\\ \\ \\\ \\\ \\ \\ \ 1 t n .t x .0`0 `0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10`a.0'0.O`0'0`0'0 '0 �o.0.O 'a`O`0 0`0 10 10`0 10 1010 10 0 10 1 Ln Cn Cn Ln Ln cn Cn!P Lq Ln Lq Ln Cn N Cn N Lq Ln Lq Cn Lq Cn Cq Ln Cq cn Lq L�Cq w Cn!n Ln Ln Lq cn Cn cq Lq N Cq VI Ln Cn Lq Ln UI Cl Lq I :p • J -PT '4^ < G C"P <.< -l1V O2Z<ZZ2ZZx333x3 7 3 -T' x z3:^ r7i.77C.L_'•1H :rHHSx 1 < � DDSs� O7OD OODD =COOO mm DM�O.-4-+ .•-4'-r ,-1'Ti 7»> ' -C D a:-4 .-r D?im z 2Z:7OO 1 .D --�H7H=a7n -i27++-IMXr< ^I X-t'J Wr7 -i{ { x n7.1 r- 2' X. DA 3- -IN -1 -i -4.17-XITM 13 5 'SrD 9@931 tD W T 4'S'Cm a �9 I V J W•-•s+a!b N a-+J) J• ;-+r tJ.= :,/V%-•✓1 N- ...• N J N PJ N W W 1 O D 7v D D DCSO OM:>-D. Z)x -50D0 -tD r I sxm?imzmzzm•-a5 1 T n 7n-1XM X X<X1"'JI :nN< •` Y1M -[x nx ZZ %+ ZMDD-4 n-11 -i 'nMXM I .. •t. r-a_I '-1 -4 H':1.i m m :II M,-4 r- -a Z T -I z d n D ti Z z T m m m 0.-1 mmm:n x xmdD 0 ••i'-+'+ 2M V N mA7C mmmrr I T 2 '•'� H H--11 r MZO-400 TmDOD71x { D -1D x-ixz z x x D H-C 1 3 O£ D n nn -+n n zmD 'TIM 7zz X £ X'7D=Y z £D7tNDDDDrom I m r 'D -IZM O1-1m -rr -'i .1d MM Ti£ D MDnrm7. �-imm - C=l-i -1-1 1 y, mxOm D0: �N� vrTd� �+ nz1 IrxDx . z3 -z-4`4 -114n'-+x 1 +?. n D m OO Z N3:xz:n'I Z Zr -4x.. T -1377�,`�x +00 000w O I DJ7 .-4 N xrZ -1 -1xODDm '-aOm_ D••n ?'- m D :7.� ng23zDm?t 1 T'-' O rm C{ CZ< : x 'rt -Am '"- � O �i7OZ �Oxx x >>—N N T I NZ M Z ` ti { r rN4 r n in D IP OOz frl— m d 0 -4 r- • D1 z z ..F+C M N Z =+ A-1-<-i X - z -i -0 m X m to -+ m a- I -I d x.'V N 00 M D M n x Cl T D m-'r H w D D H]?n m I +=: m Zi T"O H D 0x -Ix D m r mtoNZCx w I �? m Tr 77 Z -t "{mmN n n -r - 'n m NNNH-pH 1 x xrm O 1 3 C NO0-in-4n 1 O n m� rn0 NNrX x m z £mnn"MmD 1 Hai T z d DXH• -4N I I X m z T �+ D v N <D C Hn 1 T n x H-iO -1d0O 1 z r, � r n c 0 Im"wAl I m C-3 v . z vmO <0T 1 i n n :. ID n It 10 m `< 1 d 0 N DDD D DDDDD DDDDDDDDDDDDD DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD ; 3 n r{ •d O t'll It rr a C � N 1@ I n N t• 1 J>Cl WN m 10 r-jLil 1 3 -I i 13 O. N V ' CR�' `-�. P M1J rµ .• 'o ' Cn 0 �0��0) t+ pJ r W Art+ t+ + . W P -b N P VIPN '0)t•• PNNLn V'OrA@ WOrJW V•a AU -4 WAF+ CO@@@PPFJA 1 C M NSD CnMw N D9N@5 V WA0N 19b. V PJ 91.1 PJ P `a N c1A A07 V 0FJ Cn PJ to Ln@@P C4—Cn 13 to O O .. @@5t@O6' :4DN@RiLgV V t4vN@tpW J V W V w@H V03A@PtSiP V 0@@@t4U1P@t4@FJ@6701 1 � to i _ 9D@@9149W @@0)FJ VCn@@.(1@14A W00;JtJ.Q.>4`0Cn@FJNLn@CMO@@@@@IDFJ@@@1b @@@ i I d O 1 Y• 'i 1 111 t 1 n i D i 1 3 i O Nil•'' @@5@619 t4@@6'@51461@@@@t4@@9@@t4@@ Is! @@@61@@t4@@5@@@@@ rt I r t.J _ - I Z .. i N 1 10 N N Cn V 1 Tt N V U1 1•• N 10 C71 @" •0 N CJ 1•• PJ r+ W A r 7++-. N 1 W P 01C7IPNDCn Nt''ODt+ PFJNCn14 .4@ W M"W V�O ACnVNAr W0000,0, t•JD 1 D Cnd @ FJ A61 t•J@@ V WA@t•J0D V t•J@M1JNa- lS@CMA A07 V @@PJCn PJ FJ"0w o' r+ q 3 t4(4A@t4mLq V V14i9FJ@19W A V W V W @r VpJ A @PL9P V `0@@@@CgP666;--j .90 10 m A00@ @SWr4@WNVNr9O.095DW O]M1JtJ7D@r1Cq@t•JStn@LqO @5@5615 PJ@5@Nt4O@ 1 3 1 ri• D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D ID D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D l n -t-i-i-i -1-i-1-4-i-I-i-i -!-r-1-1-i-i -t-i-1 -1 --1-1 -1-1-1-I-1-1 -I-1-t-1-I-i -i-i-i-i-4-4 --1-4 1 A O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O I n xxxxx x3;xxx3;xxxxxxxxxxxxx3:2Z.33x2x3xx3; 3;x33xx3;S3:xxxx I x D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D Is D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D t -4-1 -4-i-1-1-1-1-i-1-1-1-1-i-4-i-i-1-1-1 -i-t-t-1 -4-i -i-1-1-i-1-1 -1-1-1-4-i-1 -i-i-i-1-1--1 -4-1 i t7 ..... .....F9...... .................. ...... ...... .. nnnnnnnnnnnnnonnnnnnnnclnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnlln ctc7�cinclCcl�,c.ti,nciciclnc1G7c1c1nc1ctclnctc,cic7c,G,nylzislcinCnclnclncl�,ncici;, int mm comm m m m m m m m m m mmm mmm m Milt M 71 m m rn m -1 ri rl m mm rl m m m m mi t*1 limn M M ri I Y. z z z z z z zz z z z z z z z z z z z Z Z Z T- 2 z z z z z z z zzz z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z I O mriMMM M MM MMMMMr-IMMMMmMMMM MPIMMMM M"lmr°iTTI rJ mrlmr.1MMfllnmrlm rm I •t ;n 73 m;r m x x;u w x TT x1 w xxxfixxT xi TTT x;?TTT1 x 3J T x x 7.1 J-17771T1 T I .- D D D Ss D D D D D 1s D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D 1 0 n H TI -i-i -i-1 -1 -i-1-4 -(-i-1-4-4-4-4-1-4 -i-i-4 -1 -i -1 --1 -1--i -i-4-4-i -1-t -1-1 -i -i--i-1-1-4-1 -4-t--4-4-1-i -4 -1 1 m m m m m m m m m m m m mm m m m m m m m mm m m m m m m m n m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m I r TV d d d d d d d d0 d d d du d du d d d C d d d"d t1 t7 d t7.'7 d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d I #F n nn nnn n 0n0n0n00nrl0nn000nn nnnnnC]nnnnnnnnnnnnnn nnnnn l M xZXX2:M -52222 xZMX TM xxxx xx 2xxx xx 2x S x =x2x 2S 2S Sx xT x t *) m m m rl m m m m1n m m m m m m m m m m n m m m m m m m n m m n m m m m m m m m m m m m m mnmmm 1 D-f nn nnnnnrtnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnl --inv 77 77777777:7,777777. 7•. 7.7•. 77-. X777 777: 7.7 7•: 77 T 77 777 ? 777777.: f D-"W i • fit_ � � �: �+ t/ l'.i :,i '•✓ � _ u `../ V �� .. ... � ._. ' Ofraa �< 'A q I a x _{ 9 9 9 9 9 S 9 9 'Dow :9 m 9@ 9 9 9 9 9 5 n@ 5!9 5 4 9 9@ ^> 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9@ 9 9 5 5 5 9 4 ^S f z n ,• DA A J D ? A J ? J ) D b J b .? b A .!> J b a J A ? A A J ? J .I. A A 1 r- O J7 9 9 � O •0•O^O 0^0 ^0^0 ^0.0 ^0^0 `0`0 ^0^0^C^0 O^0 0 O •O 0 -0 `0^0 b �O.>)`l`0`O �0^0�0 `0^0 10 ^0 ^0 10 v=^0 �O `C•L' I 3 !3 1 J D ?• .T ?• J• TJ` ?•.TTJ^TJ^ 'TPTJ`1- J•T^ J• ?• aTJ 'TJ•- TJ• �• .T'TSTJ•0• J^T J^ ?- T?• .T T1• J`J- TJ-?^ 17.: �� \ \ V V VJ• J- p• T;h 3" 0, T-M O NCn C90'l'r,Ln in na Da ? A a DA ?..lW W W✓1W WUIW W.•-JUAJ ?J^JU 1 '7 •1 5 r'J'" 9dOJvaLn ?wrJr 9.003 VPN9W t-J+•+ @07JV ?•Cq ? WtJ� 9.pm VP.CgDWi0 s-� M"0M VPt9b I t 9 9 5 03 5 5 9 5 9 03 9 9 J 9 5 9 9 9 9 9 1 Z 0 U A 'f'7'!it '1 it W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W it W W W W:.J i.!W W W W W(4 W W W W W t4 W W W W W i1 W W 1 \_\ \_\\_\_ V\I V V V V V V V V V V V V V V J V V V V V V V V V\I V V V V V V V V V\I V i -t•T .� � 10 10^O 10 0 10 10•O 10 10 10 10,010 10 ^0,0 ^0^0 ^0 ^0 4)`0 ^0`0 C^0 10 10.0 1010 10 10 10 10 10 10^fl 10 10^4 0 10 10 10-0 1 s •_: 'T1 . Cq Cq t1 Cq L1 Ln _1 Ln Cq Lq CA Cq to Ln to Ln tq Ln to Ln Cn Ln L1 Ln Lq Cn L1 iq!1 Lq t9 Ln tq Lq Cq Lq Ln UI L1 Lq Ln Lq Cq Cq =..n Cq to Ln CI I 'p r £ E EEE «cc CC C-i-l -t-i-1 -{-4 -4 J)>7 u)01 CA_ :Amwto CUT JT n:Om 7.1 ;n T TA TT -0 T T 1 C TT T 5 O '-t S ^'?1-! .7'-i T Z O_c TTS 7 J`•1 ?7 p X! C '>"i a 4-71 ;7 D .7 D D 9 D D -C C O O O r! :+O 0 r- 1 LTi '-r7,T: I T - j z 7 O 4 H Yy a-1 7:-1 e 1 '�'1 3• 3.T T r .^1 7:�l`_�.il = !-i T T' D x Z. w x r 0= T D --1 -1 -40 1 499 >n C9u�S94m 9'.9 vS 'n:D C .9 r9 9 ? t7'= 9 :.S 999 m u 9@ u T v a s Ts -,n 1 T- V 9 :tel'-• fA '-`t Z^ A t u U ^J.+W W t:'A .n?V W +-+W C1 a`.'W'-` O ?• -J I :3 ' - T Z E E -+ C C: C = -i-i E -1-1 -4 1-" - U) X L. n In -m x m-'n JT -3 z cn "• T:A E m T. 'n +l;1 -n T T T' T 1 ?a I, TT .Ti:9 m m , z ZZTT DOHm OD CO'-+ x0mG1, DD '-11> -<c-i:-lxm7.17• r-Hm • m I r!1 D 'A'n-J) 7. 70'-+ '--i .-a OHr Va a—<7 M - ZTr Z � z zz -•ic T!D X+??'-- Dr .7c D-i -1 O 1 .-.. tl -i-i� '-t n 'n 0 -1 -0 1 -1 t7m-0Dwt- -4 H + z;t t'T -1 -1 -<xmz%l< m' 11 -0 Zz-i t7 T I .z E mmCZDO zmxnm Drro" Mxma ECD c_ m-+ mrtgHODrI-1xZm c• '- I a `-! ET TT O :ir T 1-1-<0T-4Em -4nmO inHT OOm-< mT D z T w m 5 n-< ?i 1 3 T. cT_ 7 z `- s D C OD -1-1 mXr—m .-1:-I ;11 tar x:> mz I DHT3 m -CT t7 n T A I T UI ` '7 JI m rxz -10 S•OD -i -iz•-!anal7 a=I 110 .- ._VJ x^!r+ 2: -W > ?7 I ` O -1 � 'n0 , Tp 10ZCz - J JT .-17z -1 77 Tc MX - .tM2 LJ 0-9.-4 T-3 ^ -i I. z -?%-+D m ::703 c x 711.-i:1D\ r. Ln- -1 DL -4V aH p D ?t T 0 p m.T Z 7 D£ 2?.W 1Jn71m 7 -+ z D 0-1mz N n 'TinTDD SNZDxp DZz.-mZ v -<T:;+ DU) Tm " Tm I r•;. rtmm0) +Nx mx;n �Om Z:-4T -iZzmn 2 TMX nr 1 ti r H n T m H rT - Hames HH o� mzD -Imam zT T-i-1 noz oma+ 1 I z(nM Z T y mm zTpmH -4 q `- mCl t'+C Tn-4D Or1hDOT -IH z I 1 U) H Hr m2OO O `-n TTWOO` O WMHCO-1xZ - XI T THT -t 1'-tmDT "m7•"0TT in O O mTDZT 7 HH2 -1Tm00 TTT 1 T 0< T- m m ZTTm m • Hz H -Ti C r X -0 -Tl ZZ OmTO- r i x v - H O H O rn O t7 n c ty n z H'< 03 H CJI`-' T S T`+ ty T I O t.•�x `•� T n C C H 0 O T r D D0 -t z D r O T O D `� 1 c 'niiIini .. nNm 71 DHH .rn . D v n J1 r Z 0 -4-4 1 rt O -10 mmm mz vD a OD T t7 HH i 7 mu) *c'I rrrl T 1 Fri �. 1 -4 C O N D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D p D p D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D p'D D D D D 1 'S k-3t -6 I n tj O 4q i, S tT N I r y I @ n H I D ql W trl a, i. Ln s Ln = v m ? F+ P W Cd m t•J V 0t A V r N W>A A Cn V 1 O O 0 3 0 -� W(D -h F-+ 0, .0 ^0 mFJ CCIW •0P0!-•til10 is s-AP Vto t-• mVtq t-•@ 1 O N E.1 FD '1 m `� 'WCn 0 -� 0to C1AmCq WAtJ@@ S@Lq0•@ 3 OWf m LgPV V OL�NPf+G V: 00kvE1W0 t :1 N O �'• A07`CP^Occ. 0 -- 0- ty + 03Lq@000-V@Cq0V 9,900 Pt-J(A S+WIL70t-' T.1@3' m0^FJtJP@@Lq@ V@ 1 h to 'y_••, ^G rc,t. T s! ON Q`O Pmm DmV Wm9m W@S@9W:-•P @ W 903@mJ@@@@@Ln^0@@W@ W@ t 1 T M, b 1 C O t N .i- i n 1 p f 3 1 O ' m9m�y'+9t4mm9@@ @mm@@mmma)tpw 0@0m0O @035 mm@99.14030 s4m19mmmt4m 1 mm 9mm9 @t967@@me99mm mm @1900 -_w Lvm9m9mmm @903 mm9m� 1 � 1 rL � Z 1 rf1 � W t+t+ 1-• W 1-• 1-+ D I rt i- Cq �• Lq FA !+ m D r 0.W W r 03 FJ V Lq!-+ A V W W-D Lq V I ? 1-- P.-4() 10 m t-J m W 10 P Ln N FJ.,O 1•'1-•0- V Lq 1-- m V 0 f-m 1 D CIV i-•WLq^0 D^0 Lq Lq DmCq WAFJm0Js 9Lq 0• m0`0 W F•CgPV V`0 mm 01 el V1-•m mmmW 9 1 3 .1- 03^00-`0030" Pot (DLgmmmP V mLnm VmC�9Pa-NwmWmmCgt-'W@mmPt•Jt•JPm mtnT9 Vm I O 'f ^Oml- m PJm NO, `0m 'OPmm AwIJW wW W W mm@9WN0-m W@MOMD@@mom"`Om@WmW@ I ZI 1 It D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D > 7>D D D D D D D D D D D p D D D D D D D D D D D D D 3>D 1 n '•'l -1 H-i-1-i-1 -t H -i-i-t -1-i-I -I-1-1-i-i-i -i-i-i-i-i-i -I-r-1 -i-1-i --I--i-{ -i-i-i -1-i-i -1-i-i -1-i-i-1-1 1 N f*'^ O O O O O O O O O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 n t D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D p D D D D D D p D D D D D D D D D D D A D D D D D D D D 1 -i-i-i -i-4 -1-1 -i -1-i-i -i-1--1-i-i-1 -i-i-1-i-1-1 -t H-i -1 -i-I -i-i-i-i -i-4 -i-1-i -4-i-1 -i-1-i-1-i 1 tl v; H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H.H H.H H H N t-i H H H.H.H H H H H t-t t 1-.1 1-I H H"H Fi H H he H H I M y n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n I N I>; n G'1 cin 0 C GT11P1,Gic10 cl 0 Gi Gt 00 G'1 c1006i Gl C GT in 0 C 0001110c'10 cl cl e'1 q1 cl 6.1 G'10 Gl 0 Gi 41n i -i ImmmmmMITIrimnmmmmmnlmmrtnfelmrinmllrnmm-lmmmnmrlillmmmmmmmmmmn I r• zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzxzzzizz3zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzi -o r;•' mmnrlmrTimmrlmmm Immmmmmmnmrmmmnmm, mmmr,mmmmmnmrr,mmminm *,mn I rt 77T 7? Ti xATT TT T T T T T T TT T T T T TT Zt ;nx m ?t 7JT T. TT TTT T TT T 7TT TT TT • D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D 1 D D> D D D D D D D D D D D D D Ia D D D r 1 0 n es T -i -i -i --1-1 -i -i-i-i-i-1 -i -I-i -1-1-1 -4-1-I -i-1-i -i -1 -1 -1 -1-i -i-t-i -1-i-1-1-i-I -i-1-i -4 -i-4 -4-1-1-1-i 1 :5 -i U D m mrlmmm m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m mrlm mmm mmm m fl m m m m m m rn m m rt, mmmnm I r Gt Hry r,'rf v rJ .IV t% C t7d d "t:$ C t7 ty"c7 t7 Cl C t::j t7 t C! t::! t7t 0 `Jd C t7 117 tzf t7 d C C7 t7 t7 d[7 Ct7 t7 I • dPm ! I .. .. .. nnnnnnOno nnnnnnnnnnnnnnn0nnnnnnn000nnnnn00r)on000nI M xx 2T 2 _T_=T xx xSx XXX 2SxT X 2223: SS STxx3:x x2xxxx xxx xxxxx 1 T mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmnmmrlrlmrlrlFri mtri mmFri nmmnmmmmmmmmnm 1 D -Cm 0 noon n n n n n n Olin o n n o n n n o n n n n n n n n o Ono n n n n n n n n n,9 i 1> -b X7, 7777 f• � ter' -ti 71 xi I :3 -T cn I a K :Sm .9999 S ^• 999Sm9999mm0 .99 :7 -99mmm .9 r 9S 9m9mmm 99m '599;9mS9m 1 ?n •• ,• •• -:. 0•0•O 0,0 •0•O�L+ •0 •O�0 Y.+ �0 �c c CK' •0 0 O�1. . •O•O,.: �C�O 0^0�O�O•0•O•O�0 1 3 11 A A } V 'J`! VV IJV j Vu V V VV V VV V V V V V V 0 aJ• T aaaaa?. J. T J- aaa Y,3, J, T a a a s J. a a- S -r:1 D7 y \\ 7J V +J ;., r+ :+ :. 9 9 9 9 m 9 0 9 .-, 0•0 °O 0 `0�0 •O `0`O 10 n 9 n of J7 '77 J7 n V V V V V V 0'0 'b'A N 07 •r m'0 'J 0' �I FJ '-• 6aA LJ 7 �x VCn ?J9V '-• -ON a, Cq1 'wJ , -+ gyp 7! j \ I D ;,! 1 p W W S. O \\ S19 S1 S5999m 9@mssm smsmmmSlM9S .99 ^•? LD W W W m9S9J7+O9sr99mmm S0SlmS1 1 '0 10 9`7 W W W W W '.J W W W W(.J W W 'J WW W W W W W W W it W w it;W I 2�✓l Cq 1. w w W iJ w W W W W W W W W W W W W W W .•J W W W :.'W A:yJ �::�! W .iJ W W:r°i W W W W N'J N 7J FJ•-• I ^. ? -1 -i 0 •0 0 O•o 0 •0 0 •0•0 0•0 •o •0 •O•0•o •0 '0'0 '0 d -0 .,7 h ,o•p( ,3 ,a 0 0 a �0 •0 10•0 10•0 10•o 10'0 •0•0 .0 10 0 Cn Cn Cn Cn Cq L9 cq0 Cq Lq Cq Cq0 VI Ln Cq Ln(A 0 Cq In CA Cn clu Cq Cq cl Cq Cq Cq Cn Cq Cq Cn Cq Lq(A Lq LnN C11Lq Lq ti U Lq i""1 1;l;� 1 yi •.1 m m m m m m D 10 < << .-4 m< 777-<££ £ £ £ I < 3 nD >mTtD :>0MTTI n � Dzoonno� T no r i �, ., r .o sus ,,:TI mxz rCr l(ns+£ ozT : , rTx zD -IDDDD << .N',.rrl x+� --rizzr- I c mrmmsmscosmssLascmcs :, u a �m �mmsu�� , 5amsm�mssa� f v :. :'' '-` V;• .- ^JVU ..W_. NFJ•- b •i 'J.)D :r. 7K J• FJJW .gTn A•-• VFJV I .. 1 1 :7 =-ID7+• Hrn - -mmrn(_�� -'n:7n:lcit n -r aD DDD9D•o ••� ci z+ ii)� 3V-4EZ i ar -.t D 7r :l ClIDD • mD�oxzmmoD fi -1 -1-4 i � cJ f m•-rD 'TI '-IN•1 t. ?• > T TRi 2t`srfiCrn(A fi TX %:-4Mz v x D -1D DDS < <,•+ Z' '•••," I ::: D '-+�'t 20 ,q r�N C--I-lex-4finnn<-1 �T�••( %`72fit7D ;7rtYi2r 1 .. 0 _< t X2 :Afi b xn(AD DD 1 --lmnno- Sr m I ,• D D „ , (n.�b tri _` -<OOD Tfi Z - xn "7n-<Z Z fi mmm3i £ 3 I �r •�' r r ,loD moon DDD -4n s- 7, 7cwwr- ofV< :> D�7oDa mc"0D nt7o •DHozrDD -<-+c �amD:na rozz <r-4 0m f v } D ^ 1 -4-< fi -<m'nn-4 t7 TTfi `"JI m,m,X "1D 7 T"t<�..22oz x1-1 £ xD :1r^ :I-C) ;Ji ;n ;D -n O;ITDO?72 -tD-ir: -IT• .On-D 3Z ?iA:fi °r 77n' ?-"ImT.�OT M Z>:) :� -� .� < T J-CD 772 H.3E --tN I '!•.. '-t :4•-t-n ..n -4 3 n Z D :] .7 `Tl V D"T v -•1:1-4 m 77 vl I ITT - 'n-0 1" :Inmm W"Z7" m0 -nl �mD 7t 00 -40"71 ~ J7 " Z om -q Jnr <-4 mwz"m Zw nm mare D -rfit-i00m -1 N m om -rl o r D W -40000 7D--rr ?+ zo -4 zoazCm-- o �•+lx(n t w n 2 0 m r G1 r- HND`-'CO' 02 mDNr w T,� vn,-, "DDD 1 : - =m 1i' 1-Z'ir 1'•Iz`''mw 0z2C tnt 'CIn 3 -1 r D fi fiDr j ,r 0.0 m 3m 3C D JI fidri:1 Z3 " £ N -4 r -0 ,,, Z I L0 0 C T m r -1 D H"I" m m w N O fi m r III N77 n D `-C z z -1 " •n nr z �-an " 1 D -< m i It (S7 v N S1J O C7 n (V7 r U) v n 1 1 an v 1b"< I --i C O N t,:;:. DDDDD DDDDDDDDDD DD DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD DDD r DDDDDD DD I N �•r�Oit 1 3 n tv ONrt Crr 1b r. W i 0-1 n w rJ W ~ `'J p Lq " PJ FJ I 3 '� IJ qJ 11 A P IP 1b W'•0- ..t•J r+W CD P W A CD (Ar-•s, FJ:x W Ln "r`J m D HµV r+Cq N FJ m PJ V 1 a 0 - 103 (D D5l •om AARP V4-'07 VPrJV•O til A 10 IJ DD VIM W t•J'J Cq :•I.qw Dµ LgmLq til W'-• .+OD W V V 1 t.•n Cq ql 'S marJ@t•J `0',19m OA PCgALq -thLn-(AOD'Dmm^-rGs UILq P0,PJ00 PJ CD m9P W V ACnLJLnLi I � N � O %i,•, J' Pmmm W A V•Ol'(Dt9mP 0MLq j% 1+W 0PA0mm PCOM DrJNr••t•'•m19t9mmmV W mmmW•OmA I rt Crt m•- WM-St W A + Vm•O M w w 0 VD @A Ala ^m V V � m AmFJPm mmmmm7J CgmmmW Cgmm 1 1 ;in D i v o ;j'> 1 n i ' i D I 3 1 p ffi+S' �S9IOt4. .Ii9m•6'+I I I I Ig@igI1BIt4m9.m9ISo19s99m@ImI9mI9�g61Igt4L9@IID�St I C i m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m rs m m m m m m m m m 9 m m m m 9 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m I y 1 rJ I z W r-J W 1•- ..J O t ID AP W•O t+ rr'JF.WCDP (AA O7 Wrr FJ CCI WCq F.tJm > rrCgt,Lq 0 ' t Amr �OmA AAP Vt-•07VPFJ V'0 t•JD •O V til CD Cn 0)Cq WNV Cqm Lq Ar+ V Cq tJ rJmrJ V 1 ! Mm0- t'JW rN W W V V.1 D mAt•J mrJ O V mN•OAPCgA Cq ACn r-•W N•Omm mmm .--Ln cgPPFJ OJ tJ DD m9P W V DCgWCq VI 01 i 3 f mPmmm WA V.pAtDmmPmCO LqA"rJmPA mmmP07m AtJ rJ t• " • i ' mt"`WtAmt-•NLgW DI+ V.m•Om WfA LqV Am AA m mmmmmmV WMMW W OmA I j m9 V V961A mrJPm mmmm mNcgmmmWCq l9m 13 ' 1 ` f rt D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D T n v o 1=+D D D D D D ( n CCCCC CCC CCC CCC CCC CC C.CCC LC' O r-t-i-f-i -f-4 1 rD r_ r_CC CCCCCC L7CCmo7D • DCCCC CC 1 =r-1-1 -1 -i-I -i-i-1-I-•4-4--1-i-i-i -i-4 -4-i-4-i-1-1 -4�-1-i --1 -i-1 -4-1-1 -i -4-1 -4-4-4 G S Z t7 - . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 o o p o o O o o o o O o o 0 N-{rt • D o O o o o o 1 n I 3:3; 3:333; 333:3X3Z3ZZ33;33: 323: X33: zt ZZ33Z3; 3rA7+ tizaa333Z 1 x DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDI+DDDDD DDD-•1D(A nDDDDDD I -1-i-i-i-4 -i -i-1 -4-•1-4 -1-4-i--i-'4--1 -I-i-f 1-i-4 -4-i .� -i-i-i 'i--i-� -i -!-i -1-4-i fi n m m -i-4-4-1 -4-1 1 tv N N H "" H N N H N M H HH"N H H H H"Fi H .. ...... ... N ""HNHN ""H N.. . D•'4•S 17 H H R H "H i ql �\•''. nnnnn nnncl clnnngnrinnnrinnn nnnnnn nn nn nn nnn--1 < 77 tynnnn (1n 1 N "mr R1C Gi MG1 Gl Gl t1 �Gl M rl M G1 n rl M M t:l rii G'J Gl n41 Gl G1nG'i Gl G'1 G-1 Otil 4l cl G'in 414.7 LZONn HIn rl Gl Gl 41 L741 1 +t'• . Rl'lmrl tTlmRl r'1mf-lmmmmmmmm:TImmt!M"m mm ri fTl l7 m n tri m m m mmzn rl Gl mmmmmm I t+ Z Z 'T Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z z Z Z Z 2 Z Z Z z Z Z z Z Z 7--Z L Z Z 2 z z z O T 0 2 2 2 Z Z 7. 1 n mnm�>immmmmPimmmnmmITT m[7immRlmmmmmnmFTI m^9mnmmmm•11-m azmmFri mmm I ,t nfi :Ct 7!fis!7!fi 7Jfififififififi 77 ;:n;r., fifififiXtfi 7!fifi fiXtT fiT. fi T. fifi0-4r \ fifififi777! 1 D D D D D.D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D fi ty D D D D D D D r p n H Tt mmmmmmRimmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmulmIT]Mf7iimmmmmamto rm-Cmmmmtim I p �ticl d t7 tv 0" 1-1 t717 t7 ty C to ty C C7 t7 tv bCJwt7 t::I0 t:J•J*_,' dd17 CeJ 61 V 1-7 ty t%t't7w 7770 "01y f-1 t=1 17b 1 .6m no noon 0 0 0 0 0 0 cl n n n n n n n o n o n n o n n n n n n n n no on n"a' m d n n o n n n _ __= T=_ _=2 = _= x= Z = _ =Z C n n fi XXXXXXI T mm mmmm mm mm"Immmmmmmmrr, mrr,mmmmmnmrii�immmmmmm-vmm -< llmmmmmn I D cm nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn �nnnnnnna 3 "nonnonI -10m 777777777,7777777,7777 77•. 7777 777 i 7777777 D"tp OR1777777 1 D11 Cn i { I i 9 9 9 m 9 9 9 9 .9 9 9 9 9 9 S m 9 9 9 m 9 m V 9 1 2 n ,• A ADJDA bJ AA .� AAJ AAAAAAAAD A 'ab ,J ,�A .a. bJS A bA AAADA DAADAAAJ I = U79m Y '0 '0'0'0 '0'O'0 '0 b 43 -0'0 '0 '0'0 �C•'0'O '0 'O'0 '0 o 0 '0'0 '0 o'0 1 3 .L 7' J .S v � v.i -j 'i 'i vvvvVVVjIJ �lv vvvVvvvv �l � v ��� vVv .! j, vVv f �n a \ \ V a a a a a a a a a a to cn cn cq'0 n_'Lq _n cI A J A J A A A J D D W W s!W W W A W CA W?•J rJ?-j"r•J fJ i• I D x 9 1 y 9 'O CO V P LnA WrJ OD'�s'0 VPLgd WN '19'O 07 VPLgA WfJ '-' 9 .00} V PL9A ,1 f•J'-' s'o O7 V0. I.j I -I n b 93, A9999 S m 951 S 9 m m 993,9519 = \ \ 9515159'9 ,.7. 9:9 S,A .96J 999m 519 99 ,'190999 I 2 10 10 . W W W;.!W W W W W W W W,1 W W W W W..J.si;,,I vJ W W iJ'14 W 1 W W W W W W'J;,J W W W W t+1 W'I W W W W'1 W 1 7 W W W W W W :�! W W :,.�:,.I '.. :,1 14 :'4 W W W W W W W ..0 le 10'o 10 10 10 ( '0'0 1010 10 10 1010 10 10 10 10'0'0 '0'0 10 10'0'0'O'0 '0 '0 '0'0 '0'0'O '0 Cn in to Cn Ln Cn Cn b '0 '0 '0 '0'0'0 '0,•0 1 _ ;-ti I �1 Ln C1 Cn`-9C"'_1 Lit L90 VI Ln Ln NCn !n L9 Ln C'!t�Ln Cl Ll Ln 0C'1 Cn L•l(-q Ll cn Ln Li Cn L9 f_n LILn Ln Lq � 2 < C • WyU1 :A'nX S S;n 00 T TT T< < n < ZZ 3�3;''' �':L333; 3�r 7L.. 1 C J 9 tD = Z£ £ 7!O 2 :,1 m ',> 000 X ;7DD7Z)M C :TI mJ DJ '?77O7 Cf <OJD .-f :-; -a -1 il}2�:-i'-i:"1'-!S T. ?1 S,7 717 :A:1J .'7 1i -f ' C4,•' 9:7 ^_.+ .. cs 199515� ^a 51,7 c9 'I'S La 5'•S 9G9 S9O �.r, -�. >.J •.J996 S9La 9 ...� V.1Sc7 :+ 1 '�- V i :J J W tJ J .s - W •0 x ... ,. - _ rJ tJ 'il 1 -'{-'1-1 -l-11'n— ' MM xnxx ;nxa n 2 -nT - -n - TL .... ��. ., .... '_+D zz£ mSD2mmD= 00X0•-ID 7�7 T7D �?t ' ,D D O'er � •�, -L 3Z :•�' 3 :trT•.M1} i .* • -+.-1%� 5--+1O3r •[ rOO1Z -{7S'� 1 'nT n S^1 -<T pOH'- )-1 DDS IV .T- I '-moi{ T-IZ T I M. Mr n 1OS < � tvX 1r i n7y ;A:O c7 in-f J1n7p nS r:1 r11 71 -+ 1 S?ISHcn O D�i1 mDS 1 F. j.. D -C 77 707 r D 1 2 z m m L_ <n*n r -< S "il 2 Z to m r N'-1;� r m tJ S •4 I + S N 1-4,-nr+, 07 J)mS SD m tnrO+9 w D S N ^. 1 O 00 .7 cl0710 'n I-T D A Z, !'1;7 T•J£ n C7 S J7�l U1 0 Z r_ 9 S r n Z D .. 1 'G -{T z i ;•r1 •c-7_ :n'Tl r .-, '7'.� m'ly 7 0 -1 Ti •-i ;n D m D m:� I Sm-i JIB 5?cCs SrA - x x - n 0 T 1 z 0 ?'7 M X S D ;-: �r X )T 2 T :'T 7•. ;r; 5 < U3 n -? SC '11S 1-f D X '112Z zlW -� Cn?'f T S 7 0 z I '13:9 -0 m -..�2�D S S:J1 n - 1" ,r;m :Ji n -•O 3%-�;7 S z I mrnt7 rcn rmwrr HOZ rtn En 9 O1v r { 177 �j-1OnOt7 -( 1. N11tn+ Hm He1C m -nZ mee mc, 1 zS v cn N�cT x m�-zfT v o 1 o m CHcn znS O1rACN1, SvOH ! h!7'1Dm3 � Dz 2Q• mm-C X;am X W T < CO "C D D -q HZvSvSD +. D m r- n --40 H z " z 0 M 0 r H H z n z z 1 1 D S Z Co 1< z O ZGt 1 Hr<mD-C n to t7 r}mz rn Q• n 1 W I X t•i. 1HNH S In m DAH 77W m "D n 7 niXt1�O� fA 1(1X1 1 3 1'•' 0 Dmn1 n-CHn N m 0 cn S< D vZ o : En vi n c,H �' c, m -v10 H 1 y 1TiTh1 £ 1 1 r S O S ? ? P• = C r 1 1 n 1 S 1+. N 0 rt a m X 1 -1 d O Ui ::i-0 U1 It -+. e: o b1 .t L, L m ! -1 n Lq t•J t+ AI D G1 W N c - tJ FJ U CO A N t•J ��r W N h+ N 1 -i 13 M �'•, W co o I,) FJ uN 1 0 0 '03 N A W WAW W 'OA W WWO}Cq 'OPP 'O `O WPJPO} VtJCnPm' Cnh• Cn?JPP WV r0W mtJ0 Cn m 0 b 0ptJ DtJO V'ONL- POua m VN Or+ PCO tJ9PLn ,xi til F•FJP �!r 07mLq 9 '0mh-W t•Jrm 1 N O O i- m OD '0 .0 Cq 0m V 0mW mLgPP0@mmm mI• JA V WA mVmLn0Pmm Wm,-•0907 P m OfI mA'QAr+m 1 � u '`•: m 999 9 O m M07 C0 h'm9m A m 9'O tJ mh•m9 A V 0, V1-• V m to 9PJ m �S'PP COm9C0 m'O 9'ONPTJ9 1 {. i S RD ! d o n rt I I D m m m m m p 9t9 m m m 9 m m m m m m m m m m m tg 9 m 5'm m m 9m m m m 9 9 9 m m 61 m m m m mmmm I C mm6491S 1-13 199 mm 9mmm 01909199 m.9m96)w Mm5 m `,m 9mm9 mmmmm m9m 061000 I I r} i V I z Ul fl) tJ W t+ tJ A h• tJ tJ 07 P tJ tJ h•,-. W O7 m rJ t•J h•h+tJ t•J 1 `: . A W W A W W `OA WW WM" 10 P P'0'O W tJ P 07 VtJ CgPmW r+ Vlr Cn tJPPWV IV(X) mt+t•JmN t D , 90 'O 9tJ O '0FJ 07 V'G tJ 0POAm V07 '0 r•P 07 tJ 90•Lq 0] tJ ,-'t•J 0• V!-+ 07mLl 19 '09 rLV tJ l+m ( 3 t S c'J'O'0 Cn tl m W m Cq 4•P m m m m m m h' A V W A 9 V m Lq Cq P m m W m h+m m d V P m m m P 9 A'O is h•m I C - mm mmmm o't•J mOJ O}h+ mm mA9m '0 t•J mh'mm A9 P V F=m 61 Ln9rJmm POJmmCO m'Om 'O CDANm f � D D D D D D D D D D D D Da D D: D D D D D D D D D DD D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D n 1i.••. CCCCC C c_C 00000ID=000 CCC CCC CCC CC Cr_Crra C C C CC C-0000 CCC CC 1 O' 1 1 1 1--1-1 -i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1-1 1 1 1 1 1 -1 -1 1 -i 1 1 -i -i--1 1 1 -c 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 M O D O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O D O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f n D D 2 Z Z 5 3 3 5 3.3 2 3 3'Z 3 3 5 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 1 �c 1 D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D b D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D X. 1 1 '-1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1-i -1 1 -i-- -{ - 1 -i -{1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I d t;�.'.�_• H H N.H H H H H H.H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H N N N H..H N H H h•1 H H H H n n n n n n n n n n n n n h n C7 n n C7 n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n C7 n n n n n n n n n n n n n ! N �•`:: M M r,1 C•1 G'1 c,M t:7 G,G'1 C"1 G•1 G,C c1 M 6,m M M f,1 m M 6'1 M G7 M c1 C'1 C c1 m M M G,M nnlrlmmmnmmmmmmmnlTtmm�-tmmmmr*tmmmmmmmmmmmmnmrlmmm�tmmmmmm 1 � �•" z z z z z z z z z z z Z z z z z 2 z z z z Z Z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z Z Z z z z Z z z f rim -1 m iT7 'T1 "1 m rri m m m n m m m m m r7 m m m 1 m m ITI 1 R1 m m m m m fTl m m m m 1 m m m r m m ITi m m f` I h ' 77S%7SSSS3' SSS SSSS SS SSS "l_TSS S7? S? i� ?+ ' ]JSSSSSST SSSSSSTSS?J 1 1 1 D D b D D D D 1> D D D H T 1 1 1 1 1 1 D D D D D D D D D D D D O n . q 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -�1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 .i 1 t7 D m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m i r D Ct7tSt7C7tf t7 t7 t7 t7C CCC Ct7Ct7 t7 t7 t7 ty t7 C7 t7 ty t7 t7 t7 C7 t7 C7 t10 b t7 d Co 1-1 O t7 t7 t7 t t7 t7 C C t7 I • qf•m _?..,. I .. .. .. `;::. n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n o 000000 n!7 n o n o n n n n n n n n n n n C7 o n n n n o n o I ". -T- 2215252222522222222222 J_ T2522'^ 2222252X 522 ==222252 I .,, .t--. rlmmrlmmmmmmr*fmmrnmmmmmrtmmmtTlmrlr*lmr,mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm ! D <m n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n i 1 n m 77.777.7•. 77777.7777-. 777777777777777777777777. 77777 1 D t].P q �� 4 I T s T r '� i b•O 1 3 � 7 .15+. .•l C.q �A to 1 p > b O i -' 10 �. •-4,t :A 7 i • y .. i T N I O rr T-1 1 z T 1 3 n �t a = 1 -0 � J I 1- q tA r z N 1 tT T H r! q C to z z I } S 0 C i 2 to W. S f� 1 O fp O 1-0 I 3 3 ❑. 3 m I rt .. � I s r} W r -- 1 m 1 v v! 1 N b C1 I X f 1 1 4 N Y i I f a n G Overt ova 11 w I w I i GI n If N 1 LB 1 i D G'7 W,to a, 11 W I W I t 3 -1 1 m a u �- 1 ►• g w - I O o •03 m ' I S N C9O • w 1 7 0 t! 1 t I rt rt n r� t ra i U•0 1 ul If w t (A 1 IS)4j 1 if f i i tv O II I 1 I N rF . ii I I I n I! 1 1 I D It 1 1 I 3 If O �f ( 3 n 1 ! t rt n 1 t If W 1 W 1 1 z 1101 N I I N It W I w r I It D j tl V 1 V I V W 1 3 11 1 4' ural rolc� al ° nwi vel sw 1 It i f I rt cct = 7 00 1 n 2 3 1 X, C 1 l7 1 N I n 0 G'1 I m m 1 z z I n r,m 1 rt T;3"> I t D D -i-i mm1 r 0 GG I atm 0 l7 I -n mm 1 1, cm 017 1 --I C7 0 77. 1 D G V lJ �.. J �✓ 1. J REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item: A-4 CITY OF ATASCADERO Meeting Date : 04/25/95 ----------------------------------------------------------------- Through: Andy Takata, City Manager Via: Henry Engen, Community Development Director - From: Steve Sylvester, City Engineero SUBJECT: Acceptance of the Camino Real Assessment District Project No. 3 , Improvements in the Public Right-of-Way. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council accept the subject improvements as complete . DISCUSSION: Staff has reviewed the subject street and drainage improvements and determined them to be in substantial conformance with City Standards and the project plans and specifications approved by the City Engineer. Acceptance of the improvements will complete the requirements of Contract No. 93019 - "Agreement for the Acquisition of Improvements, City of Atascadero Camino Real Improvement Project" as authorized by Resolution 70-93 . The Camino Real Assessment District Improvements were constructed in three separate projects. The improvements constructed under Project No. 1, The El Camino Real Sanitary Sewer Main Extension, were accepted by the Minute Order dated May 3, 1994 from the Council Meeting of April 26, 1994 . The improvements constructed under Project No. 2, Rough Grading in the Caltrans Right-of-Way, were accepted by the Minute Order dated May 13 , 1994 from the Council Meeting of May, 10, 1994 . FISCAL IMPACT: The accepted improvements will be maintained by the City. ATTACHMENTS : Attachment A, Notice of Completion. 93107D07.ATA 0()0 Order No. C C Escrow No. Loan No. RECORDING REQUESTED By Doc N0: 1994-064672 Rec No: 00079175 WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: Official Records ', RF 19 .00 San Luis Obispo Co Francis M. Cooney ; Recorder ; Nov 04, 1994 ; Time: 09:49 cl JC,/ 51 ;TOTAL 19 .00 SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: 1. The undersigned is OWNER or agent of the OWNER of the interest or estate stated below in the property hereinafter described. 2. The FULL NAME of the OWNER is Invested (Real Estate Ccapanies) 3. The FULL ADDRESS of the OWNER is 200 E Carrillo Street, Suite 200 Santa Barbara, Ca. 93101 4. The NATURE OF THE INTEREST or ESTATE of the undersigned is In fee. Legal Owners (if other than fee,strike"in fee"and insert,for example,"purchaser under contract of purchase."or"lessee.' 5. The FULL NAMES and FULL ADDRESSES of ALL PERSONS,if any,WHO HOLD SUCH INTEREST or ESTATE with the undersigned as JOINT TENANTS or as TENANTS IN COMMON are: NAMES ADDRESSES NONE N/A 6. The full names and full addresses of the predecessors in interest of the undersigned if the property was transferred subsequent t the commencement of the work of improvement herein referred to: NAMES ADDRESSES C mdrto Real Fashion Out-It-t- T t-r1 anti 7627 Morro c1 , Atascadero, Ca- Golden :a_Gol eYn West Development- CD=- T_ 'G GenPr_ 1 P rtrPr 93422 7. A work of improvement on the property hereinafter described was COMPLETED October 3, 1994 8. The work of improvement completed is described as follows: Streets, Curbs, Gutters, Street Lights and Landscape Median 9. The NAME OF THE ORIGINAL CONTRACTOR, if any, for such work of improvement is 7-W, Desi-= and Cons Tucti on 10. The street address of said property is El Camillo Real and Del Rio Rd , Atascadero Ca. 11. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of Atascadero County of San Lots Obispo State of California, and is described as follows: 000OV14 (continued on reverse side) Form 1054 (1194). Page 1 of 2 Date: �f Signature of Owner or agent of owner Verification for INDIVIDUAL owner I, the under gned, declare under pq alty of perjury under the 4vews of the State of California that I am the owner of the aforesaid interest or estate in the property described in the above notice; that I read said notice, that I know and understand the contents thereof, and that the facts stated therein are true and correct. Date and Place (Signature of owner named in paragraph 2) Verification for NON-INDIVIDUAL owner: I, the undersigned, declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that I am the AGENT of the aforesaid interest or estate in the property described -PRESIDENT,PARTNER,MANAGER,AGENT,ETC.- in TC-in the above notice;that I have read the said notice,that I know and understand the contents thereof,and that the facts stated therein are true and correct. 4 o D5te and Place (Signature of pern signing on behalf of owner) Carl E. lliams, President C.E. Williams & Associates Agent for Investec E �� BTT A o dC 1 cr No. 224092 NH DESCRIP I ION PARCEL 1: That portion of Lot 13 in Block 23 of Atascadero Colony in the City of Atascadero, County of San Luis Obispo, State of California, as shown on map recorded October 21, 1914 in Book 3 at page 1 et seq., of !Saps and as shown on map recorded April 14, 1994 in Book 70 of Licensed Survey at page 81, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a 10 iron pipe with plastic cap stamped *CALIF. DOT* at the Northwesterly most corner of said Lot 13 as shown on said Licensed Survey; thence along the Southerly right-of-way line of Del Rio Road North 63" 27. 07" East, 71.49 feet to a 3/4" iron pipe with tag stamped "LS 5201" as shown on said Licensed Survey; thence along said right-of-ray line as described in Offer of Dedication recorded April 14, 1994 under Recorder's Series Number 1994-023840 of Official Records, North 70" 00' 26" East, 33.38 feet to a 3/4" iron pipe with tag stamped OLS 5201" as shown on said Licensed Survey; thence leaving said right-of-way South 25. 04' 31" Hast, 140.75 feet to a 3/4" iron pipe with tag stamped "LS 5201" as shown on said Licensed Survey; thence North 64. 55' 29" Hast, 112.04 feet to a 3/41 iron pipe with tag stamped OLS 5201" on the Southwesterly right-of-way line of E1 Camino Real as shown on Licensed Survey; thence along said right-of-way line South 25" 04. 31" East, 95.54 feet to a 3/4" iroa pipe with tag stamped "LS 5201" as shown on said Licensed Survey; thence leaving said right-of-way line South 64" 57' 48" West, 303-95 feet to a 3/4" iron Pipe with tag stamped "LS 5201" on the Northeasterly right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 101 as shown on said Licensed Survey; thence North 11" 46' 52" West, 70.01 feet to a 1" iron pipe with plastic cap stamped "CALIF. DOT" as shown on said Licensed Survey; thence North 2" 16' 12" West, 183.43 feet to the Point of Beginning. PARCEL 2: That portion of Lot 12 in Block 23 of Ata3cadero Colony in the City of Atascadero, County of San Luis Obispo, State of California, as shown on Map j recorded October 21, 1914 in Book 3 at page 1 et seq. , of Yaps, and as shown on i Map recorded April 14, 1994 in Book 70 of Licensed Surveys at page 81, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, being more particularly ! described as follows: Coamencing at a rebar and cap stamped "LS 5571" at the intersection of the Southeast Lot line of said Lot 12 with the Northeasterly right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 101 as shown on said Licensed Survey; thence along said Northeasterly right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 101 North 28' 10' 01" West, 94 .79 feet to a 1" iron pipe with plastic cap stamped "CALIF. DOT" as shown on said Licensed Survey; thence North 11" 46' 52" West, 107.12 feet to a 3/4" iron pipe ! with cap stamped "LS 5201" as shown on said Licensed Survey; thence leaving said right-of-way line North 640 57' 48" East, 303.95 feet to a 3/4" iron pipe and cap I stamped "LS 5201" on the Southwesterly right-of-way line of E1 Camino Real as i shown on said Licensed Survey; thence along said right-of-way line South 25° 04' 31" East, 198.92 feet to a rebar and cap stamped "LS 5571•; thence leaving said line South 64" 57' 48" West, 323 .47 feet to the Point of Beginning. Excepting therefrom all minerals and oil in, under or upon said land as excepted in the Deed from Lee O. Morris and May Morris, husband and wife, recorded March 17, 1965 in Book 1242 at page 61 Of Official Records. 0000 cT Pagc 2 DESCRIPT ION / Ordcr No. 224092 KH 1 All gas, oil, minerals and other hydrocarbon subsr_ances above a depth of 300 feet, and the right of surface entry have since been relinquished by Deed dated May 2, 1979 executed by May Morris, a widow, and recorded May 22, 1979. PARCEL 3: That portion of Lot 11 in Block 23 of Atascadero Colony, in the City of Atascadero, County of San Luis Obispo, State of California, as shown on map recorded October 21, 1914 in Book 3 at page 1 at seq., of Maps as shown on map recorded April 14, 1994 in Book 70 of Licensed Surveys at page 81, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a rebar and cap stamped "LS 55710 at the intersection of the Southeast Lot line of Lot 11 with the Northeasterly right-of-way line of U.S . Highway 101 as shown on said Licensed Survey; thence along said Northeasterly right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 101 North 22" 49' 31" Nest, 94 .11 feet to a 2" iron pipe with brass cap stamped "CAL DIV HWYS STA 133.00 120 RT" as shown on said Licensed Survey; thence North 28" 10' 01" Stent, 105.16 feet to a rebar and cap stamped "LS 5571' an shown on said Licensed Survey; thence leaving said right-of-way line North 64. 57' 48" Hast, 323.47 feet to a rebar and cap stamped 'LS 5571" on the Southwesterly right-of-way line of H1 Camino Real as shown on said Licensed Survey; thence along said right-of-way line South 25" 04. 31" Hast, 199.05 feet to a rebar and cap stamped "LS 55710; thence leaving said line South 64" 57' 52" West, 321.49 feet to the Point of Beginning_ PARCEL 4: That portion of Lots 9 and 10 in Block 23 of Atascadera Colony in the City of Atascadero, County of San Luis Obispo, State of California, as shown on map recorded October 21, 1914 in Book 3 at page i at seq., of Maps, and as shown on Map recorded April 14, 1994 in Book 70 of Licensed Surveys at page 81, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a reba.r and cap stamped "LS 5571" at the intersection of the Northwest Lot line of said Lot 10 with the Northeasterly rig'.-it-of-way line of U.S. Highway 101 as shown on said Licensed Survwr; thence North 64' 57. 52" Hast, 321.49 feet to a rebar and cap stamped "LS 5571" on the Southwesterly right-of-way line of H1 Camino Real as shown on said Licensed Survey; thence along said right-of-way line South 250 04' 31" Hast, 238.93 feet to a rebar and cap stamped "LS 5571" as shown on said Licensed Survey; thence leaving said line South 64' 55' 42• West, 325.21 feet to a rebar and cap stamped "LS 5571" or. the Northeasterly right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 101 as shown on said Licensed Survey; thence along said line North 280 02' 49" West, 62.35 feet to a 3/4" iron pipe with cap stamped "LS 5201" as shown on said Licensed Survey; thence North 22° 49' 31" West, 177.01 feet to the Point of Beginning. Excepting therefrom all minerals and oil in, under or upon said land. PARCEL 5: That portion of Lot 9 in Block 23 of Atascadero Colony in the City of Atascadero, County of San Luis Obispo, State of California, as shown on Map Pagc 3 DESCRIPTION Ordcr No. 224092 NH recorded October 21, 1914 in Book 3 at page 1 et seq_, of Maps and as shown on Map recorded April 14, 1994 in Book 70 of Licensed Sur-rey at page 81, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a rebar and cap stamped •LS 5571• at the intersection of the Southeast Lot line of said Lot 9 with the Northeasterly right-of-ray line of U.S. Highway 101 as shown on said Licensed Survey; thence along said line Borth 28. 02' 49• west, 159.29 feet to a rebar and cap stamped 'LS 5571• as shown on said Licensed Survey; thence Horth 64' 55' 42• East, 325-21 feet to a rebar and cap stamped `LS 5571* on the Southwesterly right-of-way line of E1 Camino Real as shown on said Licensed Survey; thence along said right-of-way line South 250 04' 31' East, 159.02 feet to a rebar and cap stamped •LS 5571' on the Southeast line of said Lot 9 as shown on said Licensed Survey; thence leaving said right-of-way line along said Lot line South 64. 55. 06• west, 316.95 feet to the Point of Beginning. Excepting therefrom all minerals and oil in, under or upon said land. r�vD Gr oc)(" mEw 0OE)?� REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL Meeting Date: 04/25/95 CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item : A-6 Through: Andy Takata, City Manager From: Lee Price, City Clerk SUBJECT: Appointments to the Citizens Task Force for Economic Recovery. RECOMMENDATION: Approve appointments to the Citizens Task Force for Economic Recovery. BACKGROUND: On March 14, 1995, the City Council authorized the formation of a Citizens Task Force for Economic Recovery and approved a proposed membership Fist. At the March 28th meeting, the City Council agreed to add the City Treasurer to the list. A letter signed by the Mayor was sent out to those groups and individuals approved for membership requesting participation. DISCUSSION: The following list of appointees are hereby submitted for approval by the City Council: Appointee Affiliation Ray Johnson City Council Member Hal Carden City Council Member Micki Korba City Treasurer (to be announced) Mayor Bewley's delegate James Patterson Councilman Luna's delegate Melanie Dunn Councilman Highland's delegate Mike Messer Planning Commission Joanne Peters Parks & Recreation Commission Bob Lilley Economic Round Table Lindsay Hampton Atascadero Land Preservation Society Joan O'Keefe Atascadero Homeowners Association Geraldine Brasher Atascadero Historical Society continued 0000-10 Report to Council April 25, 1995 Citizens Task Force for Economic Recovery Membership List, continued Appointee Affiliation Joni Roberts Atascadero Board of Realtors Shirley Moore SLO County Zoological Society Jay DeCou Atascadero Chamber of Commerce Dwight Huffman Atascadero Business Improvement Association Anthony Bridges Atascadero Unified School District Mike Hicks Former Fire Chief Ralph Dowell Former Finance Director REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL Meeting Date: 04/25/95 4 CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item : A-5 Through: Andy Takata, City Manager From: Lee Price, City Clerk SUBJECT: Mayor Appointments to the Integrated Waste Management Authority (IWMA). RECOMMENDATION: Ratify the Mayor's appointment of Councilman George Luna as the City's delegate and himself as the alternate. BACKGROUND: On March 28, 1995, the City Council agreed to join the Countywide Integrated Waste Management Authority (IWMA). The City is entitled to one delegate and one alternate to represent the City. REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL Meeting Date: 04/25/95 CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item : A-5 i Through: Andy Takata, City Manager From: Lee Price, City Clerk SUBJECT: Mayor Appointments to the Integrated Waste Management Authority(IWMA). RECOMMENDATION: Ratify the Mayor's appointment of Councilman George Luna as the City's delegate and himself as the alternate. BACKGROUND: On_March 28, 1995, the City Council agreed to join the Countywide Integrated Waste Management Authority (IWMA). The City is entitled to one delegate and one alternate to represent the City. 0000 REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL Meeting Date: 04/25/95 CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item : A-7 Through: Andy Takata, City Manager From: Lee Price, City Clerk SUBJECT: City Council Appointments to the Economic Round Table. RECOMMENDATION: Ratify Council appointments. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: At the City Council meeting of March 28, 1995, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 01-95 affirming the advisory committee's purpose and revising membership. Each member of the City Council may appoint one member-at-large. Council appointments are as follows: Councilmember Appointee Mayor Bewley Bob Franklin Councilman Carden Don Hanauer Councilman Highland Mike Lucas Councilman Johnson Stan Cherry Councilman Luna James Patterson MEETING AGENDA DATE442_a4� ITEM# n-s RESOLUTION NO. 33-95 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO SUPPORTING THE CENTRAL COAST REGIONAL TECHNOLOGY ALLIANCE WHEREAS, Commercial space programs at Vendenberg Air Force Base are certain to be a welcome major economic stimulus to the area; and WHEREAS, The Central Coast Regional Technology Alliance (CCRTA), a non- profit association representing San Luis Obispo and Santa Barbara counties, will assist companies in the region to apply for and obtain state and federal grant funds for commercial space and other programs; and WHEREAS, Regional Technology Alliances are presently operating in the regions of San Franciso, Los Angeles and San Diego; and alliances under consideration with the CCRTA are the regions of Sacramento, Central Valley, and the counties of San Bernardino/Riverside/Imperial; and WHEREAS, The CCRTA will develop programs and activities for each area in the region to create and retain jobs; create new businesses; develop new commercial or dual-use products; establish industry partnerships and consortia; demonstrate pro- ductivity enhancements within key regional industries in such areas as return on investment, reduced cost, employee training and equipment upgrades;establish public and private partnerships; commit industry support, participation and capital; leverage state, federal and private sector funds; allow participation of small business and minority, women- and disabled-veteran-owned businesses; provide work force train- ing; and WHEREAS, The CCRTA would not be limited to commercial space programs; other programs involving manufacturing, agriculture,tourism, education,environment, energy and activities which are core to the region would qualify; and WHEREAS, The key aspect of the CCRTA is to attract high-tech companies that would not locate in an area without a Regional Technology Alliance process and allow existing companies in the region to remain and expand under the CCRTA program process; and WHEREAS, The nine organizations that have provided support and input to the CCRTA are the Chambers of Commerce of Arroyo Grande, Grover Beach, Lompoc, Paso Robles, Pismo Beach, San Luis Obispo and Santa Maria, the Santa Maria Valley Economic Development Association and the Santa Barbara Industrial Association; and WHEREAS, The Western Commercial Space Center is a major supporter of CCRTA, and their personnel have provided valuable input to satisfy the CCRTA 0 requirements; and 00 0�, y:� Resolution No. 33-95 Page 2 of 2 WHEREAS, The State has provisions to provide up to $30,000 for CCRTA start- up and up to $250,000 for first year operational costs, with the intention that the CCRTA will become self supportive; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Atascadero to support the CENTRAL COAST REGIONAL TECHNOLOGY ALLIANCE and to respectfully request the approval of the CCRTA by the California Defense Conversion Council. On motion by Councilmember seconded by Councilmember the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted on the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ADOPTED: CITY OF ATASCADERO: R. DAVID BEWLEY, Mayor ATTEST: LEE PRICE, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ARTHER R. MONTANDON, City Attorney O0001), } .,. . . .. vv nl.✓ ... .. , ..... �_........... ..... .rte_. .. .._ VALLEY uo S.Pore r..NO. Z25 SANTA N ARIA SAMA MAMA ECONOMIC 01927737 93454 �\\\ SQSi922-2-7737 --� FAX 805,'349.9875 DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIA-nON NON-PROFIT'CCR?CRATiO` FOF ME.;?:Y.SA*'EA�SAfA VAUEY DEVELOPERS YOUR IMMEDIATE ACTION IS NEEDED TO HELP CE ESTABLISH CUS ) FOR CENTRAL COAST REGIONAL TECHNOLOGY BARAACOUNTY REGION . THE SAN LUIS OBISPO AND SANTA BA THE REGION HAS THIS ONE TIME OPPORTUNITY TO QUALIFY FOR ACCESS STATE AND FEDERAL GRANT FUNDS WHICH WOULD OTHERWISE NOT BE AVAILABLE TO THE REGION WITHOUT THE CCRTA. THE CCRTA IS A VITAL LINK TO ATTRACT AND RETAIN COMPANIES FOR THE NEW COMIMERCIAL SPACE EFFORT WHICH WILL CREATE NEW ,SOBS IN THE REGION. THE CCRTA WILL ALSO PROVIDE THE ABILITY TO CREATE ,YOBS AND PROGRAINIS RELATED TO -MANUFACTURING, AGRICULTURE, TOURISM, EDUCATION, ENVIRONtiiENT AND ENERGY. LE ITERS SUPPORTING THE CCRTA ARE AN IMPORTANT REQUIREMENT FOR APPROVAL FROM THE CALIFORNIA TRADE AND COMMERCE AGENCY. THE ATTACHED LETTER CONTENT SHEET AND FACT SHEET WILL ALLOW YOU TO WRITE AN EFFECTIVE LE i i ER OF SUPPORT. PLEASE REPRODUCE THIS PACKET AND FAX, DELIVER OR MAIL IT TO ANY BUSINESS, ORGANIZATION OR GOVERNMENT ENTITY THAT CAN ASSIST OUR EFFORT. DEADLINE LETTERS MUST BE MAILE-D TO THE SANTA MARIA VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION BY APRIL 26TH TO BE INCORPORATED WITH THE CCRTA APPLICATION . L! 11 1:- Vv „LL i V V I . 111 LV VIIV11i V L'L ILLV1 11L.I1 L -1 11VI 1 V VVV TVVV I V 1 , VZ SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY/SANTA BARBARA COUNTY CENTRAL COAST REGIONAL TECHNOLOGY ALLIANCE WHY DO WE NEED A REGIONAL TECHNOLOGY ALLIANCE? When the "Cold War", as we knew it for forty years ended, it created a completely different political and military atmosphere wordw,"de. Areas of critical confrontation became less critical. Military staffing and weapon advancements were reduced to a different plane more realistically addressing the new conditions of World order. Businesses that were fueled by a vigorous program of mi!itary weapon development and replacement either closed their doors, or started on the path of conversion to commercial peace time production. The Federal Government,recognizing the significant impact to our economy e.^.acted legislation furming several commissions (with fUnding) to address base closures and conversion of defense product'on to civilian commercial endeavors. A Regional Technology Alliance is key to participation in the various Federal and State Defense Conversion programs. The Central Coast Regional Technology Alliance (CCRTA), will be the conduit through which applications for funding will flow. They will provide information, application assistance, perform evaluations, and render recommendations. Whi!e a mega company might be ab!e to bear the burden and provide the expertise internally to generate an application foo defense conversions funding, there is not doubt that smalls and medium size businesses cannot. CALIFORNIA COMMERCIAL SPACEPORT,INC.AND WESTERN COMMERCIAL SPACE CENTER, INC.,VANDENBERG AFB For several years there has been a concerted effort to develop commercial space flight from Vandenberg AFB. This is now becoming a reality. The combination of local effort, legislative assistance, federal and state grants, consortium of aerospace companies, US. Air Force assistance and cooperation, and a major aerospace company have brought this program to the construction stage. The first dirt was turned in March, 1995 for a new commercial space launch facility on rased land at South Vandenberg AFB. Converting surplus or currently unused Air Force facilities and infrastructure to commercial uses;s the purest form of defense conversion. Programs involving manufacturing, agriculture, tourism, education, environment', and energy, which are core activities to the region also qualify. In the State of California legislation that created the California Space Port Authority, Western Commercial Space Center, Inc. was directed to evaluate the benefits of establishing a Central Coast Regional Technology Alliance. This process has been going on for several months. We now have a little over one month to submit our application to the state. With this letter and the three page information packet, attached we are soliciting your support to write a lever. It is seldom that multiple counties and cities have the opportunity to harr„oniously work for common good and common goals. Please p!edge your vigorous support for this effort today. 0 Paso Robles Chamber of Commerce, etc. SANTA NW;UA VALLEY 110 S.PINE Sr.,NO.225 �� �M� rI SANTAMARIA 9 ` CALIFORNIA 43',54 � 805/421-7737 DEVELOPMENT FAX 805/344.9875 • II ASSOCIATION COMbttNRYSPONSORED v NON, -PROFIT CORPORATION CENTRAL COAST REGIONAL TECHNOLOGY ALLIANCE (CCRTA) LETTER OF SUPPORT CONTENT VALLEY 011 ELOPESANTA.bLgRtA V.gLi�Y DEVELOPERS Letters from businesses, governments and organizations are needed to establish a CCRTA for the San Luis Obispo and Santa Barbara County Region. (See Fact Sheet attached) LETTERS MUST BE MAILED OR FAXED BY APRIL 26, I"S The following are samples of letter content for your use: A. We support the CCRTA because it is vital to the development of commercial space programs and Vandenberg A.F.B. It will enhance development of a new industry throughout the region. 'rhe CCRTA will also stimulate manufacturing, agriculture, tourism, and education by creating new businesses and new jobs in conjunction with these endeavors. The CCRTA is crucial to the region because over 20,000 jobs have been lost, 20 major employers have left and 15 major employers have downsized since 1990. B. We support the CCRTA because it is broad based and fully supported by the entire region. `!he CCRTA is crucial to the development of the economy in the region which represents a population of 750,000 and 700 major companies covering a diverse range of products. The CCRTA will enhance the extensive primary and secondary education infrastructure in the region. C. We support the CCRTA because it will enhance Vandenberg A.F.B. activities which has suffered a severe population reduction of over 50°l0 (16,000 to 7,000). Vandenberg AFB is central to the CCRTA region and its downturn together with other regional job losses has produced a negative economic climate that the region has never before experienced. D. If your company is willing to consider participation in the CCRTA which could include dues,joint activites or resources, please so indicate in your letter of support. YOUR LETTERS MAY BE AS BRIEF AS THREE OR FOUR SENTENCES. YOU MAY USE ANY iNFOR-NIATION YOU WISH FROM THE AITACHED FACT SHEET. ADDRESS L E'1'TER TO: Julie :tleier R-W,,lit, :haii-penon California 6efense Conversion Council REMEMBER YOUR *MA11. YOUR LE77ER TO: Santa :traria Valley Economic Developmeni Association LETTERS 110 S. Pine, #22.5 MUST BE Santa :braiia. CA 93454 INUILED BY APRIL 26 `All fellers will be individually attached to the CCRTA proposal application BE DOUN'TED; OUR ECONOMIC FUTURE IS AT STAKE 0000,1_17 SANTA MA�RIIAj VALLEY 110 S.PINE ST.,NO.zzs ECONOMIC SANTA IA 9 _ CAL.FOMRNIA 43454 DEVELOPMENT FAX 8051349-987.1ASSYC11TION COMMUNITY SPONSOP,09 NON-PROFIT CORPORATION FORMERLY:SANTA MARi.A VALLEY DEVELOCERS CENTRAL COAST REGIONAL TECHNOLOGY ALLIANCE (CCRTA) >;AC'Slur•' I The current economic condition of the Central Coast region continues to be sluggish and commercial space programs at Vandenberg AFB are certain to be a major economic stimulus to the area. Il The CCRTA will be a non-profit corporation representing the San Luis Obispo and Santa .Barbara County region. It will assist companies in the region to apply for and obtain state and federal grant funds for commercial space and other programs.The funds,approved for several years to come,are defense conversion,base closure,base recovery,technology reinvestment, economic development and other grant programs that would have to be used by companies within the CCRTA region. III Mine organizations have provided support and input and include the Paso Robles,San Luis Obispo,Pismo Beach,Grover Beach, Arroyo Grande, Santa Maria and Lomiioc Chambers of Commerce, and the Santa Maria Valley Economic Development association and the Santa Barbara Industrial Association. Many other private organizations, as well as, public entities have indicated their full support fo the CCRTA. IV The Western Commercial Space Center (WCSC:) which is the California Spaceport Authority is a major supporter and has providod valuable input to satisfy the CCRTA. V The CCRTA will develop programs and activities for each area in the region to: A. Create and retain jobs. B. Create new businesses. G Develop new commercial or dual-use producm D. 17stahlish industry partnerships and com-ortia. P_ Demonstrate productivity enhancements within key regional industries in such ares as return on investment,reduced cost, employee training,and equipment upgrades. R Isstablish public and private partnerships. G. Commit industry support,participation,and capital. li. Lcverape state,federal and private sector funds. 1. Allow participation of small businesses and minority,women and disabied-veteran owned businesses. J. Provide work force training. VI The state has provisions to provide up to$30,000 for CCRTA start up and up to$250,000 for first year operational costs. The provisions allow for subsequent funding but the intention ig that the CCRTA become self supportive. A percentage of matching funds are required from the region for start up and operational costs which are yet to be determined. Business, government and organizations throughout the region will be solicited for funding support, however, letters of support, which are needed immediately, will not constitute a commitment to participate in funding. VII The CCRTA is not limited to commercial space programs. Programs involving manufacturing, agriculture, tourism, education, environment, and energy, which are core activities to the region, also qualify. VIII The Bey aspect of the CCRTA is (1) Attract high-tech compai-ti-cs that would not locate in an area without an RTA and (2) Allow existing companies in the region to expand ander the CCRTA program. Typical programs invoke product or process ia:provem:.nls and developments, technoiogy transfer, Joint ventures, and economic enhancements. IX Regional Lchnolo y Alliances are presently operating; in the regions of San Francisco, Los Angeles and San Diego. ` Alliances under consideration with the CCRTA are the regions of Sacramento, Ccmtral Valley and the Sao L�rnc,rdino,iRiversi�e/Tmhtial counties. X The process for approva! of the CCRTA involves a detailed appUcation to the California Trade and Commerce Agency Office of Strategic Technology. it involves a strict review by the Califoraia Defense Conversion Council and their 'approval is heavily weighted by regional support which can only be shown by letters of support. 000E a;'�� ANDREA H. SEAS HAND WASNINGTON OFFICE: 1216 LONG.vORTN SUILOING W+S/.INGTON,OC 20515 Wan r.u�:ES i �y [�' {` ,{may �� }}(��.y i2o21225-3801 SC'EACE ill allgV .5 of dvc �e✓Lnfteb G"Y�MU5 315TAC7OfFICES. 78A.i art: 1'AT;'N P.C3 � a ` (�1t eA {(�y 1525 STATE ST7EET,SUIre 236 1NFR.rS"RUC-URE �ffpt �E of 1�eprz.lentattbe5 SANTA aARSARA,:A93101 � (8051 399-3578 Masbintgton, �i, 20515-0522 7780sosSTReeT.SUITI:A-2 SAN Luis Oslsro,CA 93601 MS)561-0170 April 3, 1995 Dear Business Leader: I am proud to bring to your attention an exciting development. The Regional Technology Alliance is uniting San Luis Obispo and Santa Barbara Counties in job creation efforts. As the author of the 1993 legislation that established the Commercial Spaceport Authority, I am pleased to see so inany Chambers of Commerce. economic development groups, and governmental entities truly working together. Strong bipartisan leadership from Assemblymen Tom f3ordonaro and Brooks Firestone and Senator Jack O'ConnelI has trade a dif erence. Tlie RTA envisions a broad-based nonprofit association to serve as the local voice on the California Defense Conversion Council to bring state matching funds to federal grants. In addition to high-tech educational spin-offs. the RTA could reinvigorate our region and re- dhar5_ what was once a vibrant economy with clean high-tech industry and jobs! It will tie the central coast into premier research in Caiifornia in emerging space and economic structures. T our supl;Jrt is iiet eu. 'r`.,1'ui,'ui a succ%ssmi i'­.L*.-k i1L;5i�i111ii:iU .L}c ali'r, :;Gn]l anies J1%il! be ibrccd to locate in other areas of the state. So, please join this strong and united team effort! Sit morel . Alla-tea Seastrand MeaiL—er of Congress 00003'-19 REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL Meeting Date: 4/25/95 CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda item: A-9 Through: Andy Takata, City Manager From: Michael P. McCain, Fire Chief SUBJECT: Resolution No. 32-95 - Weed Abatement Program RECOMMENDATION: Recommend adoption of Resolution No. 32-95, declaring weeds a public nuisance and commencing proceedings for the abatement of said nuisances. BACKGROUND: City Ordinance No. 61 addresses the abatement of weeds, rubbish, and similar materials which constitute a fire hazard. Adoption of Resolution No. 32-95 is the first step in this annual program which requires Council action. The attached "Exhibit A" contains parcels which appeared to require weed abatement at the time of the first inspection by the Fire Department. Owners of those parcels will receive written notice of the abatement requirements. FISCAL IMPACT• Costs involved in administering this program are recovered through the administrative fee charged to parcels abated by the City Contractor. Attachments: Proposed Resolution No. 32-95 Exhibit A MM:ps 000 1:-0 RESOLUTION NO.32-95 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO DECLARING WEEDS A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND COMMENCING PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ABATEMENT OF SAID NUISANCES The City Council of the City of Atascadero, County of San Luis Obispo, State of California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE as follows: SECTION 1. That weeds growing or potentially could grow, and rubbish, refuse and dirt upon public and private property hereinafter described, constitute or could constitute a public nuisance and are hereby declared to be such, for the reason that such weeds upon maturity will bear wingy or downy seeds, will attain such a large growth as to become a fire menace `when dry, will be otherwise noxious or dangerous, or will constitute or potentially could constitute dry grass, stubble, brush, litter or other flammable material thereby creating a hazard to public health. SECTION 2. The description of the parcels of lots of private property upon which, or in front of which, said nuisances exist, according to the official Assessment Map of said City of Atascadero, are set in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and hereby incorporated herein by reference as though here fully set forth. SECTION 3. The City Clerk is hereby ordered and directed to mail written notice of the proposed abatement to all persons owning property described in this resolution in accordance with Section 6-13.04 of City Ordinance No. 61. SECTION 4. The time at which the City Council shall hear and consider all objections or protests to the required removal of said noxious or dangerous weeds, or other flammable material will be at 7:00 p.m. on May 23, 1995. On motion by Councilperson and seconded by Councilperson the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ADOPTED: Page 2 Resolution No. 32-95 CITY OF ATASCADERO By: R. DAVID BEWLEY, Mayor ATTEST: LEE PRICE,City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ARTHER MONTANDON, City Attorney APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: MICHAEL P. MCCAIN, Fire Chief REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item: B-1 CITY OF ATASCADERO Meeting Date: 4/25/95 Through: Andrew J Takata, City Manager Via: Henry Engen, Community -Development Director. From: Steve Sylvester, City Engineer® SUBJECT• Amapoa/Tecorida Drainage - presentation of draft study and review of alternatives for reducing flooding potential in the lower portions of the Amapoa/Tecorida drainage basin RECOMMENDATIONS: Following the public hearing and discussion on the draft Amapoa/Tecorida drainage study, provide direction to staff on the prioritization of candidate projects and authorize staff to hold community meetings to further review the study. DISCUSSION: The area historically referred to as the "Amapoa/Tecorida Drainage Basin" is shown on Attachment A. Due to the frequency of flooding in the lower portions of the basin, City Staff was directed to perform a drainage study to analyze the existing flooding problems and provide recommendations for reducing the flooding potential in the lower portions of the basin. The Amapoa/Tecorida drainage basin consists of two distinct drainage sub-areas. The first drains toward Highway 101 and is roughly triangular in shape. It is bounded by Highway 101 to the northeast, Highway 41 to the northwest and Portola Road to the south. The other sub-area drains into Atascadero Lake and is bounded by Portola Road to the north, San Diego Road to the south and San Carlos, San Rafael and Highway 41 to the west. The name of the drainage basin was likely chosen because both Amapoa and Tecorida Avenues are near the location of the some of the more frequent flooding problems. Development of property from rural to more urban use has resulted in the construction of man-made structures which has had a pronounced effect on the historic flow patterns. In some cases, these structures may have aggravated the flooding experienced within the basin. The construction of Highways 41 and 101 have influenced the flow patterns in the lower reaches of the basin. Other development within the basin, such as the construction of residences and roads, has also helped shape the flow patterns which exist today. 0fit! X34 In February 1978, prior to incorporation, the County Board of Supervisors adopted Ordinance No. 1863 which prohibited the construction of new structures within the lower portions of what is now called the Amapoa/Tecorida drainage basin. This moratorium was to remain in effect until measures were taken to reduce the threat of flooding. A preliminary study by the County Engineering Department indicated that the problem resulted primarily from building in a low area into which a large area of surrounding land drains. Problems were compounded by the construction of structures in the lower portions of the basin (mostly single family residences) in a manner which obstructed drainage paths. The moratorium ordinance was adopted by the City when it incorporated in July 1979. The City Council then adopted Ordinance No. 59 on February 2.8, 1983 which repealed the building permit moratorium. Ordinance No. 59 imposed development standards for the area which were intended to protect new structures from flooding hazards. Ordinance No. 117 was adopted in February 1986 in order to impose and collect a fee on the construction and occupancy of new or expanded residential and non-residential projects within the basin. Based on a report prepared by John Kennaly Engineering, fees were imposed for the purpose of constructing public facilities to mitigate drainage problems due to the impact of new development. City Engineering Standards were adopted in March 1992 and have been applied to all new development in the basin since their adoption. These standards require drainage facilities to be designed to convey the peak flow from a 25-year design storm with safe overland routing of the 100-year flows. A 25-year design storm is a, flooding event which has a 4% chance of being equalled or exceeded in any year. Similarly, a 100-year design storm has a 1% chance of being equalled or exceeded in any given year. Subsequent to the above, City Engineering Staff was directed to perform a study of the Amapoa/Tecorida drainage basin which would: 1. Analyze the existing flooding problems within the lower portions of the basin 2. Identify and evaluate alternate strategies for correcting the flooding problems 3 . Identify candidate projects which could minimize flooding in the lower portions of the basin 4. Estimate the capital costs for the projects identified 5. Generate hydrological information which would allow for the consistent sizing of storm drain facilities within the basin. The study was not intended to identify and evaluate every occurrence of flooding within the basin. Its main purpose was to identify those areas in the lower portions of the basin which are regularly inundated and provide possible solutions to reduce flooding potential. There are areas outside the limits of the study area which experience localized flooding problems. These are 0000_3S not directly addressed in this study. However, the hydrologic information generated can be used to effectively size facilities which could lessen these localized flooding problems. An area-wide hydrological analysis was performed as part of the study to evaluate existing and proposed drainage facilities. Flows from the 10-year, 25-year and 100-year design storms were routed through the basin. It was found that at full development, most existing drainage facilities in the basin do not have adequate capacity for a 10-year design storm. A 10-year design storm has a 10% chance of being equaled or exceeded in any year and is normally the minimum standard to which drainage facilities are designed. It was found that flows in the Atascadero Lake spillway channel are regulated by the flood levels in Atascadero Creek. The channel has capacity to convey the flows from a 17-year design storm (based on FEMA flood levels in Atascadero Creek) . Storm events which cause flood levels in Atascadero Creek greater than the 17-year design storm will overtop the spillway channel banks and flow into the Amapoa/Tecorida drainage basin. The additional flow into the basin will only exacerbate the flooding caused by flows which are incident to the 464 acre watershed. In order to achieve a comprehensive solution to the flooding problems in the lower portions of the Amapoa/Tecorida basin, it is considered essential to improve the lake spillway channel. Several project alternatives were evaluated based on the flows generated from the hydrological analysis and are shown on Attachment B. The following projects were chosen because it was felt they would provide an acceptable level of flood protection with costs reasonable to the benefit provided. 1. Improve the Lake spillway channel 2 . Construct a storm drain along Highway 41 to divert water away from the flood prone areas along Azucena and Atascadero Avenues. 3 . Require a drainage analysis for projects within the basin which increase density. The analysis should demonstrate the impacts of the development on the entire basin. New developments which increase density should be required to detain excess storm water. 4 . Provide some mechanism which would allow for the maintenance of drainage facilities constructed, or naturally occurring, on private property. 5. Revise the boundaries of the Amapoa/Tecorida Fee Assessment area to include those areas east of Highway 101 which flow into the basin. These areas were omitted from the original boundary delineation. Attachment C shows the proposed revisions to the boundary. It was assumed that the lake spillway channel improvements would be designed to convey the peak flows from a 100-year design storm while the storm drain would be constructed to convey the peak flows 0OM X0136 from a 25-year design storm. The 100-year storm was chosen for the lake spillway improvements since it appears to have the single largest influence on flood levels in the Amapoa/Tecorida basin. Some easement or right-of-way acquisition may be required for the construction of these improvements. It was felt that constructing a storm drain system in the basin with capacity to convey the peak flows from a 100-year design storm would be cost prohibitive. In order to convey the flows from the 100-year design storm through the basin, the existing system of culverts under Highway 101 and Century Plaza would require upgrading. These upgrades would be in addition to the lake spillway channel improvements and the construction of a storm drain paralleling Highway 41. The total cost of a storm drain system which would have adequate capacity to convey the 100-year peak flows through the basin was estimated to be approximately $3 ,377 , 000. FISCAL IMPACT: The total cost for all phases of the storm drain construction, including improvements to the lake spillway channel, is estimated to be $1, 450, 000. Existing funding sources include Amapoa/Tecorida Drainage Impact fees and Developer Drainage Impact fees. The Amapoa/Tecorida fund balance as of April 1995 is approximately $237, 000. Other potential funding sources include a grant from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and some of participation from Caltrans. The level of funding from these potential sources has not yet been determined. In addition to the funding sources noted, an assessment district could be established to fund the recommended improvements. Deriving a fair apportionment of cost to benefit received would appear difficult considering that Amapoa/Tecorida drainage impact fees have been collected for some properties in the basin and not for others. The Council does have the discretion to impose such an assessment district even over a majority protest. A street improvement assessment district could also be established for Amapoa and Azucena Avenues. Portions of the recommended drainage improvements could be constructed along with the road improvements necessary to bring these roads into the City Maintained system. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: An environmental determination will be required before final adoption of a master drainage plan for the Amapoa/Tecorida basin. ATTACHMENTS• Attachment A - Amapoa/Tecorida Area Boundary Attachment B - Proposed Improvements 0000"'17 Z C, w = 0w0 w O d \ / e \: Im O' U-CL W W \ Q Q e a cc , f o Vy , Z" VS �"y LJ \ F QY \ z C3 m % \ o oa m Z Lu - v=i ~W (� N 00 Q w CL Q N Q 20 w t o o� - �, ,9 ,., o � • • • 1L ��� \\rte � • � sir - ' . �♦ ��is �►�✓�' r� ,����=, .� �\ // Nom ,. ;�:� •�. .,�.: .--r� , � � �, ��Q�► �,.� := �� tet■■ MRLl IWA �.. �►�� X11111���� � � all, "�, �• a a , I All ',r ••�t�r��-,.fes;�,��• III 3�i it , •� _ ,�/iir�� _. IIS ^4 ;a,��i , � •�-.�fY��% .•J •�,, I . \mss CC Cc w o o z i - Ufn w „1 wQ 'w^ Z m �/( l - " — vI = L < W w m c� ��• r; CC Q (l Ta nlafa u� F 7SNlIFIN}NN I ,l �.� .. r LLJLi LJ I ¢z C O m ¢ uj iM Z oa m� 1 t �tl�� `��F• W Shu ' v O z Q W 6 " N ¢ QQ p iii r� u 1t T` air : La z Goy- tilt auLj � v) O¢O T T . O W �i 4T w �n0 , CITY OF ATASCADERO FoUNDEJ) AS ��y Powar SII Ih '� o - DRAFT - AMAPOA/TECORIDA MASTER DRAINAGE STUDY APRIL, 1995 4/19/9`. AMAPOA/TECORDIA MASTER DRAINAGE STUDY r< 040987 * Exp: 3/31/99 �q CiV1x. OF1 JOHN B. -NEIL, ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: STEVEN J. SYLVESTER, CITY ENGINEER APRIL, 1995 BY NORTH COAST ENGINEERING, INC. 725 Creston Rd., Suite B Paso Robles, CA. 93446 (805) 239-3127 FAX 239--0758 AMAPOA/TECORIDA MASTER DRAINAGE STUDY TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NO. I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 - 1 II. INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II - 1 A. Area description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II - 1 B. History of Land-use within the Amapoa/Tecorida Drainage Basin . . II - 1 C. Land-use regulation within the Amapoa/Tecorida Drainage Basin . . II - 2 D. Scope of the Amapoa/Tecorida Master Drainage Study . . . . . . . . . 11 - 3 II1. ANALYSIS OF CURRENT FLOODING PROBLEMS . . . . . . . . . . . . Ill - 1 A. Undersized culverts and channelsIII - 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B. Historic reliance on undeveloped land to accept storm water . . . . Ill - 1 C. No formal method of maintaining existing drainage facilities on private property . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111 - 2 D. Flow from Atascadero Lake spillway channel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III - 2 IV. CONTROL STRATEGIES FOR CORRECTING EXISTING FLOODING PROBLEM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IV - 1 A. Divert storm water away from flood prone areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . IV - 1 B. Construct storm water pump stations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IV - 3 C. Construct detention basins . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IV - 3 D. Upgrade of existing facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IV - 4 E. Amend land-use regulations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IV - 5 i V. CONCLUSIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V - 1 VI. RECOMMENDATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VI - 1 VI1. PROJECT COSTS AND POSSIBLE FUNDING SOURCES . . . . . . . . VII - 1 APPENDICES Appendix A - Cost Estimates Appendix B - Hydrology Appendix C - Atascadero Lake Hydraulics Appendix D - Background FIGURES Figure 1 - Amapoa/Tecorida Area Boundary Figure 2 - Areas Prone to Inundation Figure 3 - Land-Use Designation Map Figure 4 - Proposed Improvements Figure 5 - Drainage Area Index Map Figure 6 - Existing Drainage Basin, Time of Concentration Figure 7 - Existing Drainage Basin, Summary of Flows Figure 8 - Post Improvement Drainage Basin, Time of Concentration Figure 9 - Post Improvement Summary of Flows ii I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The area historically referred to as the "Amapoa/Tecorida Drainage Basin" is shown on Figure 1. Due to the frequency of flooding in the lower portions of the basin, City Staff was directed to perform a drainage study to analyze the existing flooding problems and provide recommendations for reducing the flooding potential in the lower portions of the basin. The Amapoa/Tecorida drainage basin consists of two distinct drainage sub-areas. The northern most area drains toward the culverts under Highway 101. It is roughly triangular in shape and has a total area of 464 acres. The other sub-area drains into Atascadero Lake. Development of property from rural to more urban use has resulted in the construction of man-made structures which has had a pronounced effect on the historic flow patterns. In some cases, these structures may have aggravated the flooding experienced within the basin. The construction of Highways 41 and 101 have influenced the flow patterns in the lower reaches of the basin. Other development within the basin such as the construction of residences and roads has also helped shape the flow patterns which exist today. In February 1978, prior to incorporation, the County Board of Supervisors adopted Ordinance No. 1863 which prohibited the construction of new structures within the lower portions of what is now called the Amapoa/Tecorida drainage basin. This moratorium was to remain in effect until measures were taken to reduce the threat of flooding. A preliminary study by the County Engineering Department concluded that the problem resulted primarily from building in a low area into which a large area of surrounding land drains. Problems were compounded by the construction of structures in the lower portions of the basin (mostly single family residences) in a manner which obstructed drainage paths. The moratorium ordinance was adopted by the City when it incorporated in July 1979. The City Council then adopted Ordinance No. 59 on February 28, 1983 which repealed the building permit moratorium. Ordinance No. 59 imposed development standards for the area which were intended to protect new structures from flooding hazards. Ordinance No. 117 was adopted in February 1986 in order to impose and collect a fee on the construction and occupancy of new or expanded residential and non-residential projects within the basin. Based on a report prepared by John Kennaly Engineering, fees were imposed for the purpose of constructing public facilities to mitigate drainage problems due to the impact of new development. City Engineering Standards were adopted in March 1992 and have been applied to all new development in the basin since their adoption. These standards require drainage facilities to be designed to convey the peak flow from a 25-year design storm with safe overland routing of the 100-year flows. A 25-year design storm is a flooding event which has a 4% chance of being equalled or exceeded in any year. Similarly, a 100- year design storm has a 1 % chance of being equalled or exceeded in any given year. I - 1 Subsequent to the above, City Engineering Staff was directed to perform a study of the Amapoa/Tecorida drainage basin which would: 1. Analyze the existing flooding problems within the lower portions of the basin. 2. Identify and evaluate alternate strategies for correcting the flooding problems. 3. identify candidate projects which could minimize flooding in the lower portions of the basin. 4. Estimate the capital costs for the projects identified. 5. Generate hydrological information which would allow for the consistent sizing of storm drain facilities within the basin. The study was not intended to identify and evaluate every occurrence of flooding within the basin. Its main purpose was to identify those areas in the lower portions of the basin which are regularly inundated and provide possible solutions to reduce flooding potential. There are areas outside the limits of the study area which experience localized flooding problems. These are not directly addressed in this study. However, the hydrologic information generated can be used to effectively size facilities which could lessen these localized flooding problems. An area-wide hydrological analysis was performed as part of the study to evaluate existing and proposed drainage facilities. Flows from the 10-year and 25-year design storms were routed through the basin. It was found that at full development, most existing drainage facilities in the basin do not have adequate capacity for a 10-year design storm. A 10-year design storm has a 10% chance of being equaled or exceeded in any year and is normally the minimum standard to which drainage facilities are designed. It was found that flows in the Atascadero Lake spillway are regulated by flood levels in Atasacadero Creek. The channel has capacity to convey the flows from a 17-year design storm (based on FEMA flood levels in Atascadero Creek). Storm events which cause flood level in Atascadero Creek greater than the 17-year design storm will overtop the spillway channel banks and flow into the Amapoa/Tecorida basin. The additional flow into the basin will only exacerbate the flooding caused by flows which are incident to the 464 acre watershed. In order to achieve a comprehensive solution to the flooding problems in the lower portions of the Amapoa/Tecorida basin, it is considered essential to improve the lake spillway channel. Several project alternatives were evaluated based on the flows generated from the hydrological analysis and are shown on Figure 4. The following projects were chosen because it was felt they would provide an acceptable level of flood protection with costs reasonable to the benefit provided: 1 - 2 1. Improve the Lake spillway channel. 2. Construct a storm drain along Highway to divert water away from the flood prone areas along Azucena and Atascadero Avenues. 3. Require a drainage analysis for projects within the basin which increase density. The analysis should demonstrate the impacts of the development on the entire basin. New developments which increase density should be required to detain excess storm water. 4. Provide some mechanism which would allow for the maintenance of drainage facilities constructed, or naturally occurring, on private property. It was determined that the lake spillway channel improvements should be designed to convey the peak flows from a 100-year design storm while the storm drain would be constructed to convey the peak flows from a 25-year design storm. The 100-year storm was chosen for the lake spillway improvements since it appears to have the single largest influence on flood levels in the Amapoa/Tecorida basin.' Some easement or right-of-way acquisition may be required for the construction of these improvements. It was concluded that constructing a storm drain system in the basin with capacity to convey the peak flows from a 100-year design storm would be cost prohibitive. In order to convey the flows from the 100-year design storm through the basin, the existing system of culverts under Highway 101 and Century Plaza would require upgrading. These upgrades would be in addition to the lake spillway channel improvements and the construction of a storm drain paralleling Highway 41, and are considered inordinately expensive. The total cost of a storm drain system which would have adequate capacity to convey the 100-year peak flows through the basin was estimated to be approximately $3,377,000. The total cost for all phases of the storm drain construction, includingimprovements to the lake spillway channel, is estimated to be $1,446,000. Existing funding sources include Amapoa/Tecorida Drainage Impact fees and Developer Drainage Impact fees. The Amapoa/Tecorida fund balance as of April 1995 is approximately $237,000. Other potential funding sources include a grant from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and some of participation from Caltrans. The level of funding from these potential sources has not yet been determined. ' The incremental cost increase is warranted and reasonable for the added protection provided. 1 - 3 11. INTRODUCTION A. AREA DESCRIPTION The area historically referred to as the "Amapoa/Tecorida Drainage Basin" is shown on Figure 1. The name of the drainage basin was likely chosen because both Amapoa and Tecorida Avenues are near the location of the some of the more frequent flooding problems. There are two distinct drainage sub-areas within the basin. The first drains to the four existing 36" reinforced concrete pipes (RCP) under Highway 101 at Marchant Avenue and is roughly triangular in shape. It is bounded by Highway 101 to the northeast, Highway 41 to the northwest and Portola Road to the south. The other sub-area drains into Atascadero Lake and is bounded by Portola Road to the north, San Diego Road to the south and San Carlos, San Rafael and Highway 41 to the west. Generally the area consists of layers of softer sedimentary material (clays and silts) interspersed with hard shale-like formations. The sedimentary layers tend to be more easily eroded than the shales which could account for the basin's somewhat unusual flow patterns. The soils in the lower portion of the basin tend to exhibit poor percolation rates with a relatively high run-off coefficient. Ground-water in the lower portions of the basin tends to be relatively high within 10' of the surface. The upper portions of the basin are typically characterized by numerous small drainage swales. These swales tend to meander through relatively flat meadow-like terrain. The terrain then steepens and the drainage channels take the form of a more "normal" stream with well defined banks. Towards the lower portion of the basin the land becomes very flat. Water in this portion of the basin tends to flow slowly in sometimes ill-defined often weed-choked channels. Water also tends to pond in many locations in the lower portion of the basin. B. HISTORY OF LAND-USE WITHIN THE AMAPOA/TECORIDA DRAINAGE BASIN Prior to development, the flat areas in the lower portions of the basin were mainly used as pastures. In the winter, storm water would collect into large, natural ponds providing storage basins to hold run-off until it drained away via the natural channels. In essence, the ponds acted as detention basins allowing the natural, existing channels to function effectively. Development of property from rural to more urban uses typically increases flooding potential by increasing the area of impervious surfaces and by reducing the amount of natural detention. Roofs, driveways, and other man-made structures cause storm water to rapidly flow into drainage channels. Consequently, both the volume and the rate or run- off increases as the basin develops. The construction of building pads has filled areas which at one time may have acted as natural detention basins gradually increasing the level of flood waters. tl - 1 Development has resulted in the construction of man-made structures which can have a pronounced effect on the historic flow patterns. In some cases, these structures may have aggravated flooding experienced within the basin. The construction of Highways 41 and 101 have influenced the flow patterns in the lower reaches of the basin. Other development within the basin such as the construction of residences and roads has also helped shape the flow patterns which exist today. Figure 3 shows the existing land-use designations within the Amapoa/Tecorida basin. Much of the property in the lower portion of the basin lies within a Flood Hazard (FH) overlay zone. C. LAND-USE REGULATION WITHIN THE AMAPOA/TECORIDA DRAINAGE BASIN The following provides a brief chronologyof land-use actions taken since the Count. Y imposed a building moratorium within the Amapoa/Tecorida drainage basin. In November 1977, the San Luis Obispo County. Engineering Department conducted a preliminary flood investigation of the lower portions of the Amapoa/Tecorida drainage basin. Based upon results of that study, the County-Board of Supervisors adopted Ordinance No. 1863 which imposed a building moratorium on lots within the basin. The moratorium ordinance, codified as Section 19.56 of the County Code, was adopted by the City during incorporation as were other County Ordinances. At the request of the City Council, the City Engineering Department undertook a hydrological analysis of the Amapoa/Tecorida drainage basin in March 1981. This analysis provided a cost projection for public improvements within the basin which were intended to alleviate the flooding problems associated with development. It should be noted that this original analysis failed to include nearly 46 acres of commercially zoned property east of Highway 101. Based on the results of this first analysis, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 59 on February 28, 1983 which repealed the building permit moratorium ordinance previously adopted by the County. This ordinance also included development standards for the area which were intended to protect new structures from flooding hazards. In February 1986, Ordinance No. 117 was adopted in order to impose and collect a fee on the construction and occupancy of new or expanded residential and non-residential projects within the Amapoa/Tecorida drainage basin. These fees were imposed for the sole purpose of constructing public facilities to mitigate drainage problems due to the impact of new development. The amount of the fees collected are limited to that portion of the total anticipated cost of the public improvements (based on the cost projections from the March 1981 drainage analysis) which are reasonably attributable to the impact generated by new development in the area. II - 2 Concurrently with the adoption of Ordinance No 117, Resolution No. 9-86 was passed which established a fee required to be paid by developers within the Amapoa/Tecorida drainage basin. Subsequent to the adoption of Resolution No. 9-86, staff encountered two situations which were not covered by Ordinance No. 117 and Resolution No. 9-86. Specifically, the situations were additions and accessory uses and large single family residential lots. In response to this, Council adopted Resolution No. 98-86 to account for the above. Lot size was factored into the revised fee calculations while location of the parcel within the basin was not. Amapoa/Tecorida drainage impact fees are currently being collected as described in Resolution 98-86. City Engineering Standards were adopted in March 1992. Drainage facilities designed under these standard are required to convey the flow from a 25-year design storm from the fully developed watershed while providing safe overland conveyance of 100-year design flows. The basin's terrain coupled with the somewhat piece-meal development has limited the ability to safely route the 100-year design flows overland is limited. The 25-year design storm is a generally accepted standard for a reasonable level of flood protection. A 25-year design storm is a flooding event which is expected to have a 4% chance of being equalled or exceeded during any year. Similarly, a 100-year design storm has a 1% chance of being equaled or exceed in any given year. City standards for sizing drainage facilities have been applied to all new development since their adoption. D. SCOPE OF THE AMAPOA/TECORIDA MASTER DRAINAGE STUDY Staff was directed by Council to develop a master drainage plan for the Amapoa/Tecorida drainage basin which would: 1 . Analyze the existing flooding problems within the lower portions of the basin 2. Identify and evaluate alternate strategies for correcting the flooding problems 3. Identify candidate projects which could minimize flooding in the lower portions of the basin. 4. Estimate the capital costs for the projects identified. 5. Generate hydrological information which would allow for the consistent sizing of storm drain facilities within the basin. The study was not intended to identify and evaluate every occurrence of flooding in the basin. Its main purpose was to identify those areas in the lower portions of the basin which are regularly inundated and provide possible solutions to reduce flooding potential. There are areas outside the limits of the study area which experience localized 11 - 3 flooding problems. These are not directly addressed in this study. However, the hydrologic information generated can be used to effectively size facilities which could lessen these localized flooding problems. II - 4 D n�p O •1.rr^� 1`1 � �,.:A./'':.:'�•�`/ J 1,"�, ' � , f 'L ,,,7'' ,J, J f' 1( ' rJ }:� - � "iF r ,�';•,,' , I�,.r, ;+;5_-i p r y 7-4, l A v w� \ �:l f .` ��.f r 4,, -2 r y ! li D. J' ,r �, '')' !7!fr •Y .� -� �" :\.f , {J '.� 1,.`• ./\, \ <..� „x r 1j f )I.".�r�`•�. J � L- s � i 1i Q •.:r.'.T._ ':,,,,.,.�:.�.•d„y 'LI-C 1'-,✓T 'y','�r ,�1J''''t ' 1� ti'r of , s tl `�.. r \ I• �.. {x 4•. ' 0 ~ ` 'r1-- -Y' ` � ✓" r .:"'y '•.l>' �`V t »• •l\ "� ..) `'",� YN'i,!f r^:::t J f �,��.-•"t `l`">"!-,f-�� d\tel "1'yij f�,;w_. T-_� `+r `"`�•,.;>`,_L,.- s '_.,i..;.-�' L ,✓�e't^'i,.y\rr,�.: J � Y! �'Jti�.+ ',..�{�<"•`r ,.." �� •.:fir 1 J�.J!'' �„y 1 Yfi: `'" ( „( r '•"f i 1 'r r `' x,J,�,t. NN, •-I. tt ''rl y,. .�-�[[J y ]G Jr,\,.�,> x'� `•S. J >,h.,,::'EK,. +�` ""1..,, `�� •f \ ! j J I� � -r�.` •`�;hr F ..� 'Yi 5� :' '` st\ �;`.S'}.s5\ y" J J "`i , '1 ^.^(C .,x "�' •y r J J .r ��/s `.{ i' ti r J r 1 _a.:" xnya-. 'J' . ,'*J, ,..,,,,!�• r i�.gyy-- -(, ( , ,.!N�,j.,., .�,. 7•. ,j,d, ,\ ;��, x, `i 1 411 "' _.�.,,:Tt-`.�.,,, r i h 5 '" ` " r r r •rt, ,'a ., `; y� A.�4•fh .> Q `.,.1i .,`. f ] y ��`,,JII,,,,,, •' i f( 1� 1 ( ,l1 4 1/ y'''�y/, Q 'ff .L.��_.. J � �-.,r/x v,` _.:F,� y$..„. , ,� ,.� !yY• J S,�`F -„~S. t J � �"`+> T\ 71"� t]L1 i �P f w iA........5• � t J , V''C�',�,, � •��. ,. :{..,� r Y `C i` � !r r /�"'- *.,G.`jL.`y ,w\ � •� ",�� s J'�f � w ��' i`"C J t i yC.�' � i \ •{ 5, s '1C, " •,.,N! a .1 }.�a 1 f /�.�:� 1�'I , "�,•, ! ! �r { a r F'^.j,' .g"`y s u 1'y '�, A4'`\ ! Idly' �Ji ' (� �•�7ft �� �� �r.l !r �� , t' `y i f,7� Y,r',' ••Yr'' ,. /t y, ^, r r"Y! �' /��'I,t(,�"„� ywv�� f:r t;`_ �t, t1��f�LµSf F�I r^ � 1t�-, ��5\}t �,.,r It-' ✓� ,,� f� •���,,i�.•�rrr J i J ••__ �_-rJ ".•,�,. f "1.,. ,�'` ���rk\ F .� I r 4�"�. Ir....;y �l� .4'' �. •.. 1 yJ+n r f I ; .4! jr :l`, •; i _ 1 i 1 i r 1\ < �' y 1i 4{-..1�S �. %' � r4 r✓`�x 1, i Ji { f r``-•,,� -�-� ° '•' -.J yt.(('/,T"� t j�x,".y'/..,,,�J! �7-'^•,� , tt_ J�-.1,.,.1,,,..J✓:'l \ ,4Tr, 4i r 1..� - -'_ .'ww`.;•s'1 ,Y ('.�ti`"'"L:,..[��t � ;•y',/:�,i.j��` f` j L l.' It �. 1 r .y y ,-4}1 , ,, ;`� �,,.p� , L r F J_.1J-y- i xJ jl�•r 1 �� 5,��\. ~r (h ,ti y! l_ l� J -I(� t/" �+..a.r � ;�Y >x �'J'''+r ey�rr x"h; •ti f� � I _ , 1 '\ ,;�``J .l�" `,`G_..,./ y r+. i• 'r5 1 y C ..r ..,,,, '{ �.,. r �\'s;ti' >pa y r I .%._ --rr "`x ,1+..f'� 'C�jt�S.,L"rs\ e \�. .r ,.i..�� `�C:,,.�•i r" t. `'` drJ�'n`�, i f i...�.��•`"'-,� f I ��_.�y��' t�'S,C.•.''�.,y �..!✓'• y`y'•�' T..;yl�`'^,,. \ .•d ,:,fi;1� .1�, /J' 1 ��k„' y 1-_t. ( 'o.. `rte �,.r J p� � it 1 t s lam, �' 1't •�'`S':.iG. 1.•.. / ,rfr �° '� :� \' t r , W S , I J I I .?1 ; �\ '1 14,,.:'''" :i, lY�JJ S',r• , �'•• :it �1 r;� :i .:,�, -•-'l-_,14 ' 1, ' ' J 'Jr` fF iir, �f t,�tSflr t I�j rlf�� ly�ll�,.•`7�,i,.r"� i r)7,1 \ •yy fJ}.••,•,K`/l �"r�'1� t �, r ` Y' 4,•'' '�V�' .......�,.____._I -- Ij. tI '�r I rf"( ` _�•� { Jf'., ,}\ J ^j J, 5 ,,,,�^� Id y� 71i ✓ y '<•. .-�--.-.... -,y,._. i ]r`� r.-.,ri�f -C L- �'r 1 .''y: \k��;�''' �'� ,,,..\1f y ''t" <" fit' ,,-1nIC'"hr•,`': ' ?^, i 1r 1 iC "> YiIi \fir \ �tr r l J .J.A G-.��`+. {. j I'l' r 9 r S. t Y' �'"• ,"� .k J" ; t ,, ,- � ' -iEn ' �i ,�t ,'d i,�t.�r..,j". f' . �{ 1 1 �; n'�{-'i`'`. ^,:.:-r' 1 , y,,.. ;``r' !, /4 4 .•• t ¢.r "�""- 'i G-�•1D 1 ' r'• j ^� ,, 1'1 F..,r f_ J { \/•Ts,.....^+I w NO 4 �1fr'�.�`.`✓`x`'•.`•rlq',',�`�wf` r �•"' i,,.,'S l`�.•'�f ../�,,,. \/•'``�•�t �fr ••,,`` L.,.. IN, I \ y r Z m "._ Iy r��. .__.�•..��`-,. i� e r G �1�Y\~ \ r 'N 'd.?'���,dd� ;1/.r DQ Z �!' ��. {.y-;(.-.,._..�t^-.. { ! �,{ `�.i�`„�7,Y .��' r' � t`'��...�,r'tJ �� k. .Jv'`�•'''/� J''r-^`^. J,Y _.....t,..,�. � v f / `• \ t.. _.f-_' -,�rl`�'�, �r�f�..,,r�"T ;.0 i ..�, i r 'F� �f�`'�.i�ft y\ y�' / /�.+%`._.,,. ,�.".1`s '�I� \�,s,;..�'•'• '\"` r,,�' '�, YI• �, D D . wr. .,qtr- ,!,` �`7"', /,`,` r,•f' .;' {�L...11 T, NA OM C> Ak� Z Z •"�•4:� j' '`'`�`. `',; ,.•.,.a.`',.if j�� y. �• :,',�: -3;''y� :'\ • '.w ''.�'J-,C'_""_.._._-_ +��;,' J, •.�'Y• p(� d r~ ✓''`'�`'�,,'�\ kr�': .,r ;i.� .„,' 1" r`w--ai •+ :$ % !,i m t'\. f - �'4 ''\' .'°, ,r y`! �L' ,"5 4, "FA'` \ 51 l'.•!'. t \S\' "•'t!=,7`tl� �1�,i�x •`4Y .4 •e '1\" ,}, ,,d m 'rr 55.7'•! ',r J`r x T ti> t J,,,y1 l r1 �i �' ..:..-�... _ l,.'tr.. '\\,:` '`1r w'4.,',�'`� `•`` ' ,.,� i„`" C f 1 :s .� J ,, ✓"�•" + \'Y �'(,x. .A'tl''.;� r,�.;.a- ',` t1,,, ',t /'' /d/ t '7 v 'Y ,`r w C��S\ d-- `•, r \ ss\ 1 ------ % -- \ y+ , l _ rti1 `�. ~Y .�5,y' \•\ % O r I! l'�vi ti ,'`\4..���` \j ...-�-.. r�- r .�••J �:?...�;z f' (, j ! I I j ,�, by 'r'� ,i�, ;� � ��•'- __ ..��-R .Y=`\. �\...�' ` jll ,w r-r .f J.+ I JI_� r� � �" .y .\ It � '-i l--�- --, •-f'"�, \ • f i,.Y �•` `t�.., jiZz.,y. l jJ f, r , f' ,, 1 1j C ✓r•. ( _.Ls✓�'�y� '�';� !'•.jy { ''-,\�J^ 1 I I ,W ly�i,,.,.,A'.Cr/1 �� .,,,,•f ya �.� I `��^,�% .'it ♦,✓ �.,,;; .: NN� (/.�) .-. ._...' y':l 4/'•'.. III �, f fi Y ir!/ \ �� il•- •1 +1�'x I i 1�'� r� ' I \'•'y '``/y' �'� a 14. a) m > CIOy > m --' - v' ,/ 71 ..I. rC / cIi v 'r ,,,Jy .��• rt it t .._. J-_t i-�__ 1, -� OWN- gyp. � � `�CxV x> , • • mm IVA 44 IVA MIM / low .firMAI \ ,•,f r .;:\tib'', lie 4110 fic yam' IF litf 1 L ' d. „1 �I l l N 1 \ :ltt tog t• IN -_ "'1' /i- \.'`J i 1 i �, 1 I( \ � I i � •, \ ..P 7�'... y \ '•h `� r'r r.. 11 tr A i �r t'•i i' th Ick F_ •- /^ r r 'f1 � .. { N .t t why `-- �/;' i! 1 ,� / J � 1 ) I � �, i � r , � .'�• �t 'h \\ `•'� `� rte, i 1 if --`_.__...._ "i•i% r, % j. JJ / � � � L,�,,. i� I� 1, .,', t )tl,,,r \! 3- !/ tL• Af �' R�4y tJ r� ! f I '� �l '`, .r�,`-i'"•�'�'--'.^ 1 h ' ,�S ' ' % / f V `\ j`''il�i r rf I � ;i t, (j \\ 'k:h\ �', � i�l �t'•.'� •h��i JL �.• I� � �, ` . `; ! � lrl r r. ,..... \ �( "\\ �•; �'t� �,; '+ '6 ;fit ;; W .r i } I tLL \ LL S lr _ lfr rrh�'�. L�,L`ti`• !!) �LL.•':-i i ,,' .,t,`'h •,,•, �\,t t'ti,,y` ----------------- cn VN !! �/� tea, '"�c' �P7LCN-._.,_....,_..:::1."-'::�iY1�'!{R7�:� -- ...- j h •;\ tL•L '\ l h• , , rf it v ` v U0 vp717 � o frt CJ) r h3 CZ Q — D � "i 5 A mC7� 0 � �� � � � 0 Z 0 O g "� 0 Iam-.\ � al .r',i+� ; _..r__._ C. 4 a Z iiAC�xA_� i I 11 , r i F1 ,) I' ....T } +,k '� V N rtll \. r.Y '.1 1 1 I /:-1 --1'--- �'+ �< i` nom;.' �' C(. fes`,,. 1 •`'., . r r 'aT",- r� �� ^'f` . .i� T l \ t' 1 r.1 ." + i I 1 Ir 1 . z w K,r y� r i 1. 1w. --'• ```r ! `'`. 11 .% r`, �1,.. r �: i "'I..,r i ;I I t .1 I ,`` \ i n if f z tt;I n:, :r ,I Y k r r I r.• .J i i' .6 M1 T Yiz 4 r >. t h !'� �'� t d�P' Pl ,r v� r , .. , r , ) 1 < • v 1 t !' I d 0 yvSHt/S` {{; 1 y��,';,)*, f 4 5- x. `"�Yf.' r r t,,t. +, ++� �.....y- �'�"� T +6- -. �,f__rr' ... _li. 'fir":'` `�.` Z. i i ,',. .`` i:' k ^^St's f`, ti ',r -'. ,1 i --111P I „` !,' \� __ i `-�' _ i � t -.. 1, 1 (fJ1RC �','11�, z 't '+ •yt\ > ^. ~,,i`'I... ` '\; ._ X f *Allk 9 1 , 14 % "'`' I 11 - .. •ADZ• �__. t I ftir •aj V+; r) \I r�:' r 1 %. % r� "`. .\r .: i \' `:A ll " .... '. r 11-1 ft, t V. -- Z�/t :f - -.. ,', ! \ d75 c4''I 1 1' J...!it t I �`'�7 , ',. t a;_ - A4 . ,r X St`i 7.. r I '` ! i\ ( A r11 r i f t`1 ._�1 1 I !I t U ',. t : ',.,� f-.__. I ._�",.,I ! '..1 f ti \ ! E rT I 1 _t' `. a4.. ' '1I b .. t Y ;\ I j 1 I .'ft, .0 i3C ' I i (I t .+ rfy,, N , , I i /; r�'f� .'i./ 'rIr - I tt `'I r: 'ft i. _'.j?t12 15,'7 •� t tw t 1 I ;I 'i a i ! ! yy tet /� ,,( 1. S i1' A"u .f r .t�'y "fie, 1.ti f i _i, . .. fmj�7 ?� ':•' � 1 1, yi,.7�T_- 1 -XC ri mil w ,'rt `,ll.t F-.It-' % ___'a i 7 Y �,'� {t I F - I i (, .. T'• Y A I 1 I Y� ' i'..� 1"' 4 t' l` yri t ,fir .v r ►r i'`'-- 41 I �..,.. / I `! I tt / „J- 1 "�� �', 1 ,. .r. / w ii! al �.- {_�.,..---_.�,` ✓ t ... .' •.i Yr 4" Inti .,y,•'� _ rY I iA. �� a t I' ,11 ._..,:i trt;rr It r i '3{ ti_ -�q._✓ i•---! 4.• F. `,�. . i I ..... } , •// _i!! i.. Qt I 1 E..-..... 1 I .S i i 4 y ,' ( ` 1 `1.,. i'x • ` r r .; II; _.r ,r vvv"' �,, ?, ( r,. i rr rr Ir i ✓ � ,. �S\ '1...^ fI , A- '! d� j ='Ll .,� ”i`.._!(.e'er. \.. �. �, ri < �j`r .. .. I,� _ .i ////'''���� 4' \- l,. y y I 1-1I ( !; m N� �,, max. �,ti: s f' �I '- i r �, 48, i ' ' i r +. +'i ' ti'l -'T ...3^. t' a •'� .,c� ;�'1,. ,a�'N_ 1 t w [_. L Jr F ,, r q I t .�"...'U _Z "....t t _r i it y y �3. ' �� ^�`.� ,� I , .., rr ,._i`' , i 7-- i m': f*1 T'!',- 1 y > `ry rr t ii _ r: - ! .__i .l - f - .{ ,lye,,,-- i 1 ,�1 I , 1 1 t 1 ..-f rrl �•'st` '`' I `rfr '` t `r ^` t 11 .....__21 1 ' i i i i$ I mr- i y V,4:� i ` .ir t I, I I". 1 I ""', d; I , , 1-t....l 1 irrrri I ` i. .., • 1 , 1', i T 1 , �!� .i. ,..�- . . - t sr - Y -i t r LL--------------------- _____________ . 11 - ''------ 1..-t. ..� , I .1 f 1 '6 A, ''I } 4} ' -:RCS -11 1 .� _ i y_ .i i i Pj . 1 t `., t �Y,. I ` ` I % , `' , a 14 i _ I } t 1 , i� ,` , . . ■ I+ Y, lir{�1j t w1. r _' f Is �� rrlX ♦ 1 .If,' ' -.I+ ... r i (�'--1.-.;...., I;,o;.. 1' 1 !.-.!7 'y . r -,r , f", _._... %, l. , , . F; z1. `v /. .. _ I �; N 1. O i( r x � i _ C `N .._ -. Y `. '. t �. } d fi a; t �i . J ! !.__ i r -.. . 1 L I O l.. Irr M. __. rr r % .J...... ! L .t !' 1'S,Y 'J la 1. Jr ��� I 1 r r�' , _ rI �� 1r ', -- _ �.'! :: ,, ( . 11 � .1.; ,. _.... 11, •, i ,,+ t. `:.6 \ ,�_ ASi J 1 4 111 �v ^ter I.i;q-11�- , i 9 , I , r 1. .+ `. 4 :.....'�---- ----1. . ,.r .``` f2 ^ I`, r1 \ J` J Y ,Z ti f -- ,%­...%...J, . �. ., I .'�11."',�I... .. ,., �OL t.. �� it r I I )f. R�h" ', , 15 \ " r 4 A.. t ' �d M , R r� 0 ✓% '�t� �,+. V 11` I S �'` ,t r:: 311 i 1 .�I»rtz .'��ebia ... i i y !' 1 1 O mK _ ' , cn � �. � ` -.- --1 rf , i I— . m -D - ; . T - - . K > Z" D C r V Z � Dm o 1 m m � r 1 m p 1((V���j r� Ni O v m m I m mO 0 � 8 y Z 3D tm 0 Z -48 h CR90 9 � � � g � bi m -gym rn> s 8 2 �7, o > c �A > ro - 4 U Iv � � _< p10 m z m III. ANALYSIS OF CURRENT FLOODING PROBLEM The Amapoa/Tecorida basin experiences flooding for a variety of reasons. Each must be addressed in order to formulate a comprehensive solution to reduce flooding potential. Figure 2 shows the areas in the lower portion of the basin which are prone to inundation. The unusually heavy rainfall which occurred the winter of 1995 provided a unique opportunity to observe the basin during periods of heavy run-off. It was possible to observe drainage features that would not be readily apparent during normal rainfall years. A. UNDERSIZED CULVERTS AND CHANNELS Many of the man-made culverts and channels constructed within the basin are currently undersized. The flat topography of the lower portions of the basin coupled with a large volume of run-off and low water velocities would typically require the use of large facilities to handle even moderate storm events. Natural channels within the lower portions of the basin tend to be weed-choked and ill- defined with little slope. Cleaning of these channels has proved probllematic in the past due to the impacts cleaning operations have on the aquatic life which resides there. The California Department of Fish and Game has a history of limiting the City's ability to clear growth from the channels for habitat preservation reasons. In addition, many of the channels are located on private property. Large facilities probably seemed impractical when the area was mostly rural. Consequently, many of the existing drainage improvements do not have adequate capacity to convey the flows which they now experience due to the development which has occurred in the basin. Currently the entire 464 acre basin below Atascadero Lake drains northerly to the existing culverts under Highway 101 at Marchant Avenue. This culvert system continues under EI Camino Real and Century Plaza eventually discharging into Atascadero Creek. It was found that the four existing 36" reinforced concrete pipes (RCP) under Highway 101 do not have adequate capacity to convey the peak flows from a 10-year storm event from the fully developed basin nor do the facilities into which they discharge. Storms which produce flows in excess of the culvert's capacity flow overland along Marchant Avenue, cross Highway 41 and continue northerly to Atascadero Creek via an existing drainage channel. Figure 4 shows the approximate location of these existing culverts. B. HISTORIC RELIANCE ON UNDEVELOPED LAND TO ACCEPT STORM WATER In areas of flat terrain such as those which exist in the lower portions of the basin, structures were typically constructed on pads which were elevated 6"-12" above the surrounding land. During heavy rainfall, storm water would pond around the structure III - 1 and on adjacent properties without inundating the structure. In effect, undeveloped land adjacent to these structures was being used as detention basins to store run-off which could not be accommodated by the natural drainage channels. As construction continued and the amount of undeveloped land decreased, flood water levels gradually increased due to the loss of detention volume. This could account for the flooding some of the older structures in the basin are now experiencing. While these structures may have originally been built above the flood level, they are now prone to inundation due to the aggregate loss of detention volume and increased flood levels caused by the continued development of the basin. C. NO FORMAL METHOD OF MAINTAINING EXISTING DRAINAGE FACILITIES ON PRIVATE PROPERTY Many of the natural drainage channels and culverts have been constructed on private property. Some have become overgrown with vegetation and filled with silt. The flat topography of the lower portions of the basin does not allow water to flow at sufficiently high velocities to scour clean the channels. Instead the channels become choked with vegetation, further inhibiting the flow of storm water and aggravating flooding problems. While the City ordinances do have provisions to minimize the effects of new development on drainage ways and watercourses, they do not contain specific provisions for the continued maintenance of drainage facilities constructed, or naturally occurring, on private property. D. FLOW FROM ATASCADERO LAKE SPILLWAY CHANNEL Flow from the Atascadero lake spillway channel appears to be the largest single source of flood waters in the Amapoa/Tecorida basin during storm events greater than the 17-year event.. In order to attempt any comprehensive solution for the drainage problems in the Amapoa/Tecorida basin, some method to prevent the lake spillway channel from overflowing into the basin must be implemented. A detailed study of the lake spillway channel during a 100-year storm event was previously performed by John Kennaly Engineering and is included in this study as Appendix A. The Kennaly study calculated the 100-year outflow from Atascadero Lake to be 360 cubic feet per second (cfs). The elevation of the spillway channel bank is 902'. During larger storm events, the water surface of Atascadero Creek can rise above elevation 902' forcing water up into the lake spillway channel. When this occurs, water flowing from the lake spillway discharges directly into the Amapoa/Tecorida basin. The problem is further exacerbated as Atascadero Creek continues to rise adding additional flows into the Amapoa/Tecorida basin. 111 - 2 The additional volume of water flowing into the basin from the spillway channel has serious consequences as evidenced during the higher than average rains of 1995. Water overflowing the spillway channel is released into one of the most flood prone areas within the basin. The flat topography of this area allows for the formation of pools in some cases 2 - 3 feet deep. The heavy rains experienced during the winter of 1995 and subsequent high water levels in Atascadero Creek demonstrated the effects flows into the basin from the Atascadero Lake spillway channel can have. Property damage in the flat areas along Azucena Avenue and east of Highway 41 was high. In summary, during a 100-year design storm approximately 360 cfs from the lake combines with 120 cfs from Atascadero Creek for a total flow of approximately 480 cfs into the Amapoa/Tecorida basin. This may be chronicled as follows: 1 . The lake fills and begins to flow over the spillway while the Water Surface Elevations (WSEL) in Atascadero Creek is increasing. 2. The WSEL of Atascadero Creek increases until it equals the elevation of the spillway channel bank. At this time.the entire lake outflow begins to flow into the Amapoa/Tecorida basin. 3. The WSEL of Atascadero Creek continues to increase, contributing yet additional flow into the Amapoa/Tecorida basin. The flow from the lake spillway channel into the Amapoa/Tecorida drainage basin has a significant affect on the flooding which occurs in the lower portions of the basin during larger storm events. The 100-year flow rate from the Atascadero Lake Drainage basin developed by Kennaly would appear valid for future conditions since much of the basin is currently developed. The remaining undeveloped portions are relatively large lots (2.5 acres or more) and should have minimal impact on the 100-year runoff. A careful examination of the potential increase in runoff for this portion of the basin should be made prior to any future zoning changes which would increase density and subsequently increase run-off. II1 - 3 IV. CONTROL STRATEGIES FOR CORRECTING EXISTING FLOODING PROBLEMS . A variety of engineering solutions are available to mitigate flooding. Because portions of the basin are distinctly different from each other, different storm water control strategies may be required at various locations. The following provides available techniques and analysis of each solution. A. DIVERT STORM WATER FLOWS AWAY FROM FLOOD PRONE AREAS Routing the flow of water to alternate drainage channels or streams can mitigate flooding. Care must be exercised to insure that the channel or stream into which the flow is diverted has sufficient capacity to accept the additional.water. Modifying or upgrading existing facilities, such as the lake spillway channel, to prevent flows from entering flood prone areas would also fall into this category. The Atascadero Lake spillway channel has been identified as being a critical problem for the basin during larger storm events. Improvements to the spillway channel could have a pronounced affect on reducing flood levels in the lower portions of the basin by keeping flows from the lake spillway and Atascadero Creek from discharging into the basin. To prevent overtopping of the spillway channel two options are available. 1. Construction of a culvert system from the Atascadero Lake spillway through Highway 41 discharging into Atascadero Creek. 2. Construction of an earthen dike on the north side of the channel. The dike would need to have a top elevation of about 906' to prevent overtopping and have adequate free-board. Free-board is the distance between the water surface and the top of the dike or control structure which provides a factor of safety for the structure. Caltrans has indicated that they would not likely support the construction of a levee along the north side of the spillway channel since its construction could possibly inundate Highway 41. Therefore the more likely alternative would be the construction of a culvert system from the Atascadero Lake spillway to Highway 41 as shown on Figure 4. Construction of these improvements may require the acquisition of easements or rights-of-way. It is not expected that construction of the lake spillway channel improvements will exacerbate flooding along Atascadero Creek. However, the final design should evaluate the impacts these improvements will have on flood levels in Atascadero Creek. Preventing flows from entering the Amapoa/Tecorida basin from the lake spillway channel will not alleviate all of the flooding experienced in the basin. Areas below the IV - 1 lake spillway channel could still experience flooding due to rain fall incident to the basin. Additional improvements would need to be constructed in order to effect a more comprehensive solution to the flooding problem. The lower portions of the Amapoa/Tecorida drainage basin exhibit very flat topography which causes storm water to flow slowly and pond in many locations. In order to more rapidly move storm water through the basin and divert it away from flood prone areas, a gravity flow storm drain could be constructed parallel with Highway 41. This storm drain could discharge into Atascadero Creek below the portions of the basin which are currently experiencing flooding problems. Figure 4 shows one possible routing of this storm drain. Based on the hydrological analysis, it would appear that the storm drain could be designed and constructed at a reasonable cost to convey peak flow from 25-year design storm assuming there is no in- flow from the lake spillway channel. The flows would be conveyed north along Highway 41 to a large drainage channel which exists parallel to Highway 101. Storm water would be conveyed via an this existing drainage channel west to Atascadero Creek. The construction of this storm drain would divert water away from the existing culverts on Marchant Avenue at Highway 101. These existing culverts are currently operating at. capacity even during relatively minor storm events. It should be noted that when the capacity of these culverts is exceeded, the excess flow proceeds overland to the drainage i channel into which the proposed storm drain would discharge. In essence, there will be no net "diversion" of storm water as a result of construction of the Highway 41 storm drain. The storm drain would move water more efficiently through the Amapoa/Tecorida drainage basin. This could potentially reduce peak flows in Atascadero Creek by allowing peak flows from the Amapoa/Tecorida basin to discharge into the creek channel ahead of the peak flow in Atascadero Creek. The storm drain could be extended to capture and divert water from the area draining to the intersection of Marchant and San Francisco Avenues. Approximately 18% of the total drainage area could be intercepted at this location. Diversion of this water coupled with improvements to the lake spillway channel could prove effective in alleviating flooding problems which exist along Azucena Avenue. With such a diversion, the existing rectangular concrete channel between Azucena and Amapoa Avenues would have adequate capacity to convey the storm water incident to these areas. The storm drain could be further extended to address other areas of localized flooding. The flood prone areas between Highway 41 and Tecorida Avenue would also benefit from the diversion of storm water into Atascadero Creek. Depending on materials, design and construction, the service life of a gravity flow storm todrain would be high (100+ years) with maintenance costs similar to other storm drain IV - 2 systems in the City. Most storm drain improvements could be kept within public rights- of-way. However the preferred alignment of the Azucena Avenue/San Francisco Avenue portion of the storm drain could require the acquisition of an easement. B. CONSTRUCT STORM WATER PUMP STATIONS Pump stations are normally constructed in locations where the possibility of draining an area with a gravity flow storm drain system does not readily exist. A storm water pump station could be constructed near the intersection of Amapoa Road and Curbaril Avenues. This area has Kittle slope to allow surface waters to runoff. Many area are depressed and become shallow ponds during even minor storm events. A pump station could divert flows to Atascadero Creek thereby reducing the size of downstream facilities or increasing the effectiveness of existing facilities. A relatively large pump station would be required in order to convey the peak flows from a 25-year storm event even if the lake spillway channel improvements are constructed. The pump would need to be located deep enough to allow for the construction of several local storm drains which would collect water from the Amapoa/Azucena Road area. In this manner drainage problems, such a local ponding, could be reduced. A storm drain network would need to be constructed in conjunction with the pump station to convey flows from the flood prone areas. The pump station would not completely eliminate flooding problems which occur below Curbaril Avenue thus requiring the construction of additional improvements in this portion of the basin. Depending on materials, design and construction, the service life of a pump station would be moderate (20+ years). Maintenance costs would include pump repair, silt removal, vandalism repair and eventual replacement of the pumps and appurtenant hardware. During times of peak demand (large storm events), the power supply to the pumps becomes less reliable therefore back-up generators are normally required. Acquisition of property for the construction of a pump station would likely be required. C. CONSTRUCT DETENTION BASINS Properly designed detention basins can capture peak storm water flows and release them gradually after the more intense rainfall and run-off has passed. Existing areas which are currently detaining storm water run off could be maintained or enhanced - in some cases "undersized" facilities actually have created detention basins and also serve to reduce peak flows. These areas could be maintained and/or enhanced to continue to attenuate peak flows from certain portion of the drainage basin. IV - 3 Atascadero Lake could also be used as a detention facility. Water could be drained from the lake prior to the onset of the winter rains. The storage gained by lowering the water surface could then attenuate peak flows from this portion of the basin. There are several locations available for construction of detention basins which could assist in controlling the rate of run off. Without judging the effectiveness or feasibility of each site, the following are potential locations for detention basins: 1. Curbaril Avenue and Highway 101 - the southeast corner of this intersection is already formed into a basin. This site is capable of capturing and controlling the runoff from much of the drainage basin which lies east of Highway 101. 2. Coromar Avenue - there are several areas along Coromar which are already formed into a basins and could be used -to contain and control runoff from this portion of the drainage basin. They are located at the intersection of Marchant and Coromar, northeast of the intersection of Coromar and Curbaril and southeast of the intersection of Coromar and Curbaril. 3. East of San Francisco Road - this point is tributary to approximately 18% of the total drainage basin. A detention basin at this location could reduce peak flows allowing the size of downstream facilities to be reduced. 4. San Andres Avenue at the intersection of Tecorida Avenue - this area acts as a natural detention basin due to the culvert crossing of San Andres Avenue. Homes in the area have been constructed to account for the ponding which occurs in this area during more intense storm events. D. UPGRADE OF EXISTING FACILITIES This can include installing man-made channels, culverts and collection facilities. Clearing natural channels of vegetation also falls into this category. A 464 acre portion of the Amapoa/Tecorida area drains north to the existing culverts under Highway 101. These culverts, as well as the existing facilities into which they discharge, have been identified as having inadequate capacity to convey the flows from a 10-year design storm. A comprehensive solution of upgrading existing facilities would likely involve improvements to the entire culvert system from Highway 101 north to Atascadero Creek. In addition to these upgrades, other facilities would need to be improved and constructed to reduce flooding in other areas in the basin. IV - 4 E. AMEND LAND-USE REGULATIONS Land-use regulations could be established which restrict the amount of impervious surface that can be constructed for a given land area. This type of regulation would minimize the increase in flood levels within the basin. A mechanism could be established which would allow for the maintenance of drainage facilities either constructed, or naturally occurring, on private property. Regular maintenance of these existing drainage facilities could reduce flooding potential. Projects within the drainage basin which increase impervious area, density and run-off (additions, parcel maps, tract maps, and rezones to a higher use) could be required to submit a drainage analysis which demonstrates they do not increase flood levels in-the lower portions of the basin. These developments could be required to detain excess storm water resulting from the increase in density. They could be required to demonstrate that existing or future facilities have adequate capacity for the additional run-off generated by the project. IV - 5 V. CONCLUSIONS While it is not considered feasible at this time to solve all of the Iocahzed flooding and nuisance water problems within the basin, the most severe flooding which occurs in the lower portions of the basin can be reduced. The following are the conclusions drawn from the analysis of the various control strategies. A. DIVERT STORM WATER AWAY FROM FLOOD PRONE AREAS The most comprehensive solution to the flooding in the lower portions of the basin would appear to be the diversion of storm water away from flood prone areas and into Atascadero Creek. An adequate conveyance structure for the lake overflow would allow the size of other facilities in the lower portions of the basin to be reduced. The design could include construction of a concrete box culvert or similar structure from the Atascadero Lake spillway along the spillway channel continuing under Highway 41 and outleting into Atascadero Creek. This structure should be designed to have adequate capacity to convey the peak flows from a 100-year design storm to Atascadero Creek. The 100-year design storm was chosen for the lake spillway channel improvements since flows from this channel appear to have the single largest influence on flood levels in the lower portions of the basin. A levee does not appear feasible due to the likelihood of inundating Highway 41 and Caltrans' reluctance. The effects this diversion will have on the flow characteristics of Atascadero Creek should be evaluated in the final design. Construction of the lake spillway channel improvements alone will not solve the areas flooding problems. Rainfall which is incident to the watershed would continue to cause problems in the lower portions of the basin and in other areas where existing facilities may be inadequate. A series of storm drains could be designed to convey storm water which is generated from rainfall incident to the watershed. Based on a preliminary analysis, it appears that a storm drain system could be constructed which could convey flows through the flood prone areas in the lower portions of the basin to a point of discharge in Atascadero Creek. Figure 4 shows the proposed location and preliminary sizes for the facilities described above. Normally such a system would be designed to convey the peak flows from a 25- year storm event in conformance with City Standards. This generallyaccepted standard normally provides an acceptable level of protection. Due to the somewhat piece-meal development in the basin, the ability to safely route the 100-year design flows overland is limited. Flows in excess of the system's design would flow overland following historic drainage courses. This could result in flooding in the lower portions of the basin. Some property damage would be expected. The effects construction of this diversion will have on the flow characteristics of Atascadero Creek should be evaluated in the final design. V - 1 Future phases may include the following and should be considered in the design of the storm drain improvements: A. Construction of a storm drain lateral along Navajoa Avenue to drain areas of localized ponding B. Construction of a storm drain lateral along Azucena Avenue to drain areas of localized ponding. B. CONSTRUCT STORM WATER PUMP STATIONS The construction of a storm water pump station would not be a likely alternative since the possibility exists for the construction of a gravity flow storm drain system. In addition to the pump station itself, a storm drain network would need to be constructed from the pump station to various areas along Azucena Avenue. Construction of the pump station alone would not eliminate the need for improvements below Curbaril Avenue. An estimate of the capital costs for constructing a storm water pump station and its supporting storm drain network is included in Appendix A. The benefits derived from construction of the pump station do not appear reasonable considering their cost. In addition, other facilities would be required to reduce the flooding potential in other areas within the basin. C. CONSTRUCT DETENTION BASINS Detention basins are relatively large facilities. Purchasing the land necessary for their construction could make their use too costly. Detention basins also require regular maintenance to remove sediments and accumulated brush and debris which also contributes to their cost. Water which may remain in the basin could become habitat for aquatic life which could hinder maintenance due to environmental regulations. The most likely areas for the construction of detention basins are located along Marchant Avenue. While construction of detention basins in this portion of the watershed could reduce flows to the culverts under Highway 101, it does not appear that their influence would prove effective on eliminating flooding in the areas along Atascadero and Azucena Avenues. It is not recommended that Atascadero lake be used to detain storm water run-off. Using the lake as a detention basin would require the lowering of the water surface in the lake prior to storm events. Should the storm event not occur, lake levels could remain low throughout the remainder of the year having an impact on the lake's recreational uses. Using the lake as a detention basin would not reduce flows into the Amapoa/Tecorida basin which result from high flood levels in Atascadero Creek. V - 2 D. UPGRADE EXISTING FACILITIES In order to form a comprehensive and practicable solution, all existing facilities from Highway 101 north to Atascadero Creek would need to be improved. This would include upgrading/supplementing the existing culverts under Highway 101, EI Camino Real, Santa Ysabel and Century Plaza. Other improvements throughout the basin to solve the flooding problems would be required in addition to the upgrades noted. An estimate of the capital costs for improving the existing drainage system between Highway 101 north to Atascadero Creek is included in Appendix A. The benefits derived from such an upgrade do not appear reasonable considering their cost. In addition, other facilities would be required to reduce the flooding potential in other areas within the basin. E. AMEND LAND-USE REGULATIONS According to the Planning Department, the basin is currently at 90% build-out. Imposing a land-use restriction which would limit the amount of impervious area for a given land area would derive its largest benefit by limiting the size of additions to existing uses. Restricting the amount of impervious area for future development would not solve the existing flooding problems. It could be effective in minimizing the increase of flood levels within the basin. A mechanism for the maintenance of drainage facilities either constructed, or naturally occurring, on private property could reduce flooding potential by removing impediments to storm water flow. Acquiring easements or offers of dedication for the drainage facilities located on private property would allow for City maintenance. Requiring projects within the drainage basin that increase imperviousarea, density and run-off (additions, parcel maps, tract maps, and rezones to a higher use) to detain excess storm water could be effective in slowing the increase of flood levels within the basin. However, with the basin at 90% build-out, the effectiveness would be limited. V - 3 VI. RECOMMENDATIONS The following projects and or actions were chosen because it was felt they would provide an acceptable level flood protection with costs reasonable to the benefit provided. The priority of these projects should be established by the City Council. 1. Construct the Atascadero Lake spillway channel improvements. 2. Construct a storm drain paralleling Highway 41 (refer to Figure 4). Design the system to convey the peak flow from a 25-year design storm in conformance with City Standards. The construction of the storm drain could be a multi-phased project as follows: Phase 1 - Construct a storm drain along Highway 41 from the overflow swale at Highway 101 to approximately 1200' north of Curbaril Avenue. Reconstruct the existing diversion structure located approximately 1000' north of Curbaril Avenue. The new diversion structure should be moved to the north to better align with the culverts under Atascadero Avenue. Construct a gunite or concrete lined channel from the diversion structure to Atascadero Avenue. Construct new culverts under Atascadero Avenue. Phase 2 - Continue the Highway 41 storm drain from the diversion box to Curbaril Avenue. Construct a storm drain lateral to intercept the flows at the intersection of Marchant and San Francisco Avenue. 3. Projects within the drainage basin which increase density and run-off (parcel maps, tract maps, and rezones to a higher use) should be required to submit a drainage analysis which demonstrates their impact on the entire drainage basin. New developments should be required to detain excess storm water resulting from the increase in density should the analysis demonstrate that existing or future facilities do not have adequate capacity for the additional run-off or if the project will result in the increase of flood levels in other portions of the basin. 4. Establish some mechanism which allows for the maintenance of drainage facilities constructed, or naturally occurring, on private property. Another alternative is to acquire easements or offers of dedication for these facilities to allow for City maintenance. 5. Revise the boundaries of the Amapoa/Tecorida Fee Assessment area to include the areas east of Highway 101 which flow into the basin. These areas were omitted from the original boundary delineation. VI - 1 _VII. PROTECT COSTS AND POSSIBLE FUNDING SOURCES Appendix A contains itemized cost estimates for each of the candidate project listed in Section VI - Recommendations. A matrix is included in Appendix A which summarizes project costs and possible funding sources. The estimated costs for the capital improvements recommended in Section VI are as fol lows: 1. Atascadero Lake spillway channel improvements $ 311,000 2. Highway 41 storm drain, Phase 1 (25-year design) 732,000 3. Highway 41 storm drain, Phase 2 (25-year design) 433,000 TOTAL $1,476,000 The estimated capital costs of other project alternatives are included in Appendix A. These projects were not chosen because the benefits derived from the projects did not appear reasonable considering the costs. Various funding sources are currently available to begin construction of the recommended improvements. They include: 1. Amapoa/Tecorida Drainage Impact Fees have been collected from developers within the Amapoa/Tecorida district. The fees are intended for capital improvements within the basin to reduce flooding potential. As of April 7, 1995 there is $236,801 in the Amapoa/Tecorida fund. There are approximately 91 lots remaining in the Amapoa/Tecorida fee assessment area which could potentially contribute to the fund. With an average fee of $5,392 for a single family residential lot and ultimate build-out of the City projected to be the year 2002 (per the General Plan), approximately $490,600 of additional funds could potentially be collected. Discussions with planning staff indicate that the build- out date of 2002 may be optimistic based on the reduced number of applications processed in the past 2-3 years. 2. Caltrans has indicated that they would consider providing assistance to fund the construction of the improvements within their right-of-way which could reduce the flooding potential in the Amapoa/Tecorida basin. The level of participation has not yet been determined. Per discussions with the District Hydraulics Engineer, the City would likely design and construct the storm drain with some level of Caltrans participation. 3. City staff has applied for $300,000 in disaster relief monies from FEMA (storm no. 1046) for improvements within the Amapoa/Tecorida basin. VII - 1 4. In addition to the funding sources noted, an assessment district could be established to fund the recommended improvements. Deriving a fair apportionment of costs to benefits received would appear difficult considering that Amapoa/Tecorida drainage impact fees have been collected for some properties in the basin and not for others. The Council does have the discretion to impose such an assessment district even over a majority protest. 5. A street improvement assessment district could also be established for Amapoa and Azucena Avenues. Portions of the recommended drainage improvements could be constructed along with the road improvements necessary to bring these roads into the City Maintained system. PROTECT COST/FUNDING SOURCE SUMMARY PROI ECT Lake Spillway Channel Improvements $310,838 Highway 41 Storm Drain, Phase 1 732,375 Highway 41 Storm Drain, Phase 2 433,215 TOTAL $1,476,428 AVAILABLE FUNDING SOURCES Amapoa/Tecorida Drainage Impact Fees $236,801' Developer Drainage Impact Fees $372,0002 POTENTIAL FUNDING SOURCES Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) $300,0003 Caltrans unknown 'Fund balance as of April 7, 1995. Additional revenues could reach $490,600 at full build-out. VII - 2 APPENDIX A - COST ESTIMATES Page Project Cost/Funding Source Summary A-1 Atascadero Lake Spillway Channel improvements A-2 Highway 41 Storm Drain, Phase 1, 10-year design A-3 Highway 41 Storm Drain, Phase 2, 10-year design A-4 Highway 41 Storm Drain, Phase 1, 25-year design A-5 Highway 41 Storm Drain, Phase 2, 25-year design A-6 Amapoa Pump Station A-7 Highway 101 Culvert Upgrade, 10-year design A-8 Highway 101 Culvert Upgrade, 25-year design A-9 • PROIECT COST/FUNDING SOURCE SUMMARY. P ROI ECT Lake Spillway Channel Improvments $310,838 Highway 41 Storm Drain, Phase 1 732,375 Highway 41 Storm Drain, Phase 2 433,215 TOTAL $1,476,428 AVAILABLE FUNDING SOURCES Amapoa/Tecorida Drainage Impact Fees $236,801' Developer Drainage Impact Fees $372,0002 POTENTIAL FUNDING SOURCES Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) $300,000' Caltrans unknown ' Fund balance as of April 7, 1995. Additional revenues could reach $490,600 at full build-out. 2Fund balance as of April 7, 1995. An unknown portion of this fund could be used to fund improvments within the Amapoa/Tecorida basin. 3Amount applied for under storm No. 1046 APPENDIX A - COST ESTIMATES Page Project Cost/Funding Source Summary A-1 Atascadero Lake Spillway Channel Improvements A-2 Highway 41 Storm Drain, Phase 1, 10-year design A-3 Highway 41 Storm Drain, Phase 2, 10-year design A-4 Highway 41 Storm Drain, Phase 1, 25-year design A-5 Highway 41 Storm Drain, Phase 2, 25-year design A-6 Amapoa Pump Station A-7 Highway 101 Culvert Upgrade, 10-year design A-8 Highway 101 Culvert Upgrade, 25-year design A-9 PROTECT COST/FUNDING SOURCE SUMMARY PROI ECT Lake Spillway Channel Improvments $310,838 Highway 41 Storm Drain, Phase 1 732,375 Highway 41 Storm Drain, Phase 2 433.215 TOTAL $1,476,428 AVAILABLE FUNDING SOURCES Amapoa/Tecorida Drainage Impact Fees $236,801' Developer Drainage Impact Fees $372,0002 POTENTIAL FUNDING SOURCES Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) $300,000' Caltrans unknown ' Fund balance as of April 7, 1995. Additional revenues could reach $490,600 at full build-out. 2Fund balance as of April 7, 1995. An unknown portion of this fund could be used to fund improvments within the Amapoa/Tecorida basin. 'Amount applied for under storm No. 1046 A-1 AMAPOA/TECORIDA MASTER DRAINAGE STUDY PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE ATASCADERO LAKE SPILLWAY CHANNELIMPROVEMENTS ITEM QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL EARTHWORK-DEMOLITION REMOVE AC PAVEMENT(SF) 600 1.00 600.00 SUBTOTAL $600.00 STORM DRAIN 5'x10' PC BOX CULVERT(LF) 750 $300.00 $225,000.00 WINGWALLS (LF) 15 150.00 2,250.00 RIP RAP, PLACED DRY(CY) 10 60.00 600.00 SUBTOTAL $227,850.00 STREETS TRENCH RESURFACE (SF) 600 3.00 -_--M-1,800.00 SUBTOTAL 1800.00 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST $230,250.00 ENGINEERING/STAKING/TESTING CLD 15% $34,537.50 CONTINGENCY @ 20% $46,050.00 TOTAL $310,837.50 THIS PRELIMINARY OPINION AS TO COSTS IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS A GUARANTEE OF COSTS. N.C.E.HAS NO CONTROL OVER THE COSTS OF LABOR,MATERIALS,EQUIPMENT,FUTURE MARKET CONDITIONS OR CONTRACTOR'S BIDDING METHODS. THE ACTUAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION MAY VARY FROM THE ESTIMATES AND/OR THE PROJECT BUDGET. (CC)K\QPROPRVT\RDK\TECO_P1.WQ1 PRICE LIST UPDATED 6-1-94 A-2 AMAPOA/TECORIDA MASTER DRAINAGE STUDY PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE PHASE 1 - 10 YEAR DESIGN HIGHWAY 41 STORM DRAIN ITEM QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL EARTHWORK-DEMOLITION REMOVE AC PAVEMENT(SF) 400 $1.00 $400.00 DEMOLISH/DISPOSE DIVERSION BOX( 1 $1,000.00 1,000.00 SUBTOTAL $1,400.00 STORM DRAIN 18" RCP (LF) 70 $40.00 $2,800.00 54" RCP (LF) 1,300 140.00 182,000.00 60" RCP (LF) 1,600 150.00 240,000.00 MANHOLES (EA) 5 2,000.00 10,000.00 CALTRANS#651 DROP INLET (EA) 2 2,200.00 4,400.00 RELOCATE DIVERSION BOX(EA) 1 2,500.00 2,500.00 10'x2' PC CHANNEL(LF) 1,000 75.00 75,000.00 SUBTOTAL $513,900.00 STREETS TRENCH RESURFACE (SF) 400 $3.00 $1,200.00 SUBTOTAL $1,200.00 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST $516,500.00 ENGINEERING/STAKING/TESTING 77,475.00 c@ 15% CONTINGENCY @ 20% 103,300.00 TOTAL $697,275.00 THIS PRELIMINARY OPINION AS TO COSTS IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS A GUARANTEE OF COSTS. N.C.E.HAS NO CONTROL OVER THE COSTS OF LABOR,MATERIALS,EQUIPMENT,FUTURE MARKET CONDITIONS OR CONTRACTOR'S BIDDING METHODS. THE ACTUAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION MAY VARY FROM THE EXTIMATES AND/OR THE PROJECT BUDGET. (CC)K:QPROPRVTIRDKIPHASE2 3.WQ1 PRICE LIST UPDATED 6-1-94 A-3 AMAPOA/TECORIDA MASTER DRAINAGE STUDY PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE PHASE 2 - 10 YEAR STORM HIGHWAY 41 STORM DRAIN ITEM QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL EARTHWORK-DEMOLITION REMOVE AC PAVEMENT (SF) 400 $1.00 $400.00 SUBTOTAL $400.00 STORM DRAIN 18" RCP (LF) 120 $40.00 $4,800.00 36"CPP (LF) 1,600 $42.00 $67,200.00 42" CPP (LF) 450 55.00 24,750.00 48"RCP (LF) 1,250 140.00 175,000.00 ATAS.#502 DROP INLET(EA) 2 2,000.00 $4,000.00 MANHOLES (EA) 7 2,000.00 14,000.00 JUNCTION BOX(EA) 1 750.00 750.00 SUBTOTAL $290,500.00 STREETS TRENCH RESURFACE (SF) 400 $3.00 $1,200.00 SUBTOTAL $1,200.00 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST $292,100.00 ENGINEERING/STAKING/TESTING 43,815.00 C@15% CONTINGENCY @ 20% 58,420.00 TOTAL $394,335.W THIS PRELIMINARY OPINION AS TO COSTS IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS A GUARANTEE OF COSTS. N.C.E.HAS NO CONTROL OVER THE COSTS OF LABOR,MATERIALS,EQUIPMENT,FUTURE MARKET CONDITIONS OR CONTRACTOR'S BIDDING METHODS. THE ACTUAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION MAY VARY FROM THE ESTIMATES AND/OR THE PROJECT BUDGET. (CC)K:\QPROPRVT\RDK\PHASE2_3.WQ1 PRICE LIST UPDATED 6-1-94 A-4 AMAPOA/TECORIDA MASTER DRAINAGE STUDY PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE PHASE 1 - 25 YEAR STORM HIGHWAY 41 STORM DRAIN ITEM QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL EARTHWORK-DEMOLITION REMOVE AC PAVEMENT(SF) 400 $1.00 $400.00 DEMOLISH/DISPOSE DIVERSION BOX( 1 $1,000.00 1,000.00 SUBTOTAL $1,400.00 STORM DRAIN 18" RCP (LF) 70 $40.00 $2,800.00 60" RCP (LF) 1,600 150.00 240,000.00 66" RCP (LF) 1,300 160.00 208,000.00 MANHOLES (EA) 5 2,000.00 10,000.00 CALTRANS#651 DROP INLET(EA) 2 2,200.00 4,400.00 RELOCATE DIVERSION BOX(EA) 1 2,500.00 2,500.00 10'x2' PC CHANNEL(LF) 1,000 75.00 75,000.00 SUBTOTAL $539,900.00 STREETS TRENCH RESURFACE (SF) 400 $3.00 $1,200.00 SUBTOTAL $1,200.00 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST $542,500.00 ENGINEERING/STAKING/TESTING 81,375.00 @15% CONTINGENCY c@ 20 % 108,500.00 TOTAL $732,375.00 THIS PRELIMINARY OPINION AS TO COSTS IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS A GUARANTEE OFCOSTS. N.C.E.HAS NO CONTROL OVER THE COSTS OF LABOR,MATERIALS,EQUIPMENT,FUTURE MARKET CONDITIONS OR CONTRACTOR'S BIDDING METHODS. THE ACTUAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION MAY VARY FROM THE EXTIMATES AND/OR THE PROJECT BUDGET. (CC)K:\QPROPRVT\RDK\PHASE2_3.WQ2 PRICE LIST UPDATED 6-1-94 A-5 AMAPO,A/TECORIDA MASTER DRAINAGE STUDY PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE PHASE 2 - 25 YEAR STORM HIGHWAY 41 STORM DRAIN ITEM QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL EARTHWORK-DEMOLITION REMOVE AC PAVEMENT(SF) 7,600 $1.00 $7,600.00 SUBTOTAL $7,600.00 STORM DRAIN 18" RCP (LF) 120 $40.00 $4,800.00 36"CPP (LF) 1,600 $42.00 $67,200.00 48"CPP (LF) 450 55.00 24,750.00 54" RCP (LF) 1,250 140.00 175,000.00 ATAS.#502 DROP INLET(EA) 2 2,000.00 $4,000.00 MANHOLES (EA) 7 2,000.00 14,000.00 JUNCTION BOX (EA) 1 750.00 750.00 SUBTOTAL $290,500.00 STREETS TRENCH RESURFACE (SF) 7,600 $3.00 $22,800.00 SUBTOTAL 22800.00 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST $320,900.00 ENGINEERING/STAKING/TESTING 48,135.00 @15% CONTINGENCY @ 20 % 64,180.00 TOTAL $433,215.OT- THIS PRELIMINARY OPINION AS TO COSTS IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS A GUARANTEE OF COSTS. N.C.E.HAS NO CONTROL OVER THE COSTS OF LABOR,MATERIALS,EQUIPMENT,FUTURE MARKET CONDITIONS OR CONTRACTOR'S BIDDING METHODS. THE ACTUAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION MAY VARY FROM THE ESTIMATES AND/OR THE PROJECT BUDGET. (CC)K:\QPROPRVT\RDKPHASE2_3.WQ1 PRICE LIST UPDATED 6-1-94 A-6 AMAPOA/TECORIDA MASTER DRAINAGE STUDY PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE AMAPOA PUMP STATION ITEM QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL EARTHWORK-DEMOLITION REMOVE AC PAVEMENT(SF) 5,950 1.00 5,950.00 SUMP EXCAVATION (CY) 200 5.00 1,000.00 SUBTOTAL $6,950.00 STORM DRAIN 250HP PUMPS W/SWITCH GEAR (EA) 3 225,000.00 675,000.00 175KW STANDBY GENERATOR (EA) 1 30,000.00 30,000.00 PC SUMP 20'x2O'xl5'DEEP (EA) 1 35,000.00, 35,000.00 MISC PIPING &STRUCTURES (LS) 1 25,000.00 25,000.00 POWER SUPPLY -416VOLT 550AMP (LS) 1 20,000.00 20,000.00 36" PVC DISCHARGE PIPE (LF) 850 110.00 93,500.00 HEADWALL W/WINGWALL(CY) 3 $300.00 $900.00 RIP RAP, CONCRETE BEDDED (CY) 3 175.00 525.00 36"CPP @ AZUCENA(LF) 1,250 42.00 52,500.00 48"CPP (LF) 500 55.00' 27,500.00 TRENCH RESURFACE (SF) 18,200 3.00' 54,600.00 SUBTOTAL $1,014,525.00 MISCELLANEOUS 6' MASONRY FENCE (LF) 200 $45.00 $9,000.00 SITE ACQUISITION (LS) 1 $75,000.00 $75,000.00 SUBTOTAL $84,000.00 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST $1,105,475.00 ENGINEERING/STAKING/TESTING @ 15 ' $165,821.25 CONTINGENCY CLD 20 % $221,095.00 TOTAL $1,492,391.25 THIS PRELIMINARY OPINION AS TO COSTS IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS A GUARANTEE OF COSTS. N.C.E. HAS NO CONTROL OVER THE COSTS OF LABOR,MATERIALS,EQUIPMENT,FUTURE MARKET CONDITIONS OR CONTRACTOR'S BIDDING METHODS. THE ACTUAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION MAY VARY FROM THE ESTIMATES AND/OR THE PROJECT BUDGET (CC)K:\QPROPRVT\RDMTASPUMP.WB1 PRICE LIST UPDATED 6-1-94 A-7 AMAPOA/TECORIDA MASTER DRAINAGE STUDY PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE REPLACE MARCHANT & CENTURY PLAZA CULVERT 10 YEAR DESIGN ITEM QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL EARTHWORK-DEMOLITION REMOVE CURB/GUTTER(LF) 875 $3.00 $2,625.00 REMOVE PC SIDEWALK(SF) 8,000 1.00 8,000.00 REMOVE AC PAVEMENT(SF) 19,500 1.00 19,500.00 REMOVE HEADWALLS (CY) 18 100.00 1,800.00 REMOVE 3-66"CMP (LF) 700 50.00 35,000.00 REMOVE 3- 54" RCP (LF) 700 45.00 31,500.00 REMOVE 3'x6' PC BOX CULVERT(LF) 100 85.00 8,500.00 SUBTOTAL $104,300.00 STORM DRAIN PIPE JACKING 36" (LF) 840 $550.00 $462,000.00 36" RCP (LF) 840 58.00 48,720.00 66" RCP (LF) 4,200 125.00 525,000.00 3'x21'PC BOX CULVERT(LF) 100 500.00 50,000.00 HEADWALLS (CY) 18 $300.00 $5,400.00 SUBTOTAL $1,091,120.00 STREETS PC CURB AND GUTTER (LF) 875 12.00 10,500.00 PC SIDEWALK(SF) 8,000 2.50 20,000.00 TRENCH RESURFACE (SF) 19,500 3.00 58,500.00 SUBTOTAL $89,000.00 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST $1,284,420.00 ENGINEERING/STAKING/TESTING t@D15% 192,663.00 CONTINGENCY @ 20% 256,884.00 TOTAL $1,733,967.00 THIS PRELIMINARY OPINION AS TO COSTS IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS A GUARANTEE OF COSTS. N.C.E.HAS NO CONTROL OVER THE COSTS OF LABOR,MATERIALS,EQUIPMENT,FUTURE MARKET CONDITIONS OR CONTRACTOR'S BIDDING METHODS. THE ACTUAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION MAY VARY FROM THE ESTIMATES AND/OR THE PROJECT BUDGET. • (CC)K:\QPROPRVT\RDK\TECO_UPG.WQ2 PRICE LIST UPDATED 6-1-94 A-8 AMAPOA/TECORIDA MASTER DRAINAGE STUDY PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE REPLACE MARCHANT & CENTURY PLAZA CULVERT 25 YEAR DESIGN ITEM QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL EARTHWORK-DEMOLITION REMOVE CURB/GUTTER (LF) 875 $3.00 $2,625.00 REMOVE PC SIDEWALK(SF) 8,000 1.00 8,000.00 REMOVE AC PAVEMENT(SF) 22,760 1.00 22,760.00 REMOVE HEADWALLS (CY) 16 100.00 1,600.00 REMOVE 3-66"CMP (LF) 700 50.00 35,000.00 REMOVE 3- 54" RCP (LF) 700 45.00 31,500.00 REMOVE 3'x6' PC BOX CULVERT(LF) 100 85.00 8,500.00 SUBTOTAL $109,985.00 STORM DRAIN PIPE JACKING 36" (LF) 840 $550.00 $462,000.00 36" RCP (LF) 840 58.00 48,720.00 60" RCP (LF) 5,600 115.00 644,000.00 3'x18' PC BOX CULVERT(LF) 100 400.00 40,000.00 HEADWALLS (CY) 16 $300.00 $4,800.00 SUBTOTAL $1,199,520.00 STREETS PC CURB AND GUTTER (LF) 875 12.00 10,500.00 PC SIDEWALK(SF) 8,000 2.50 20,000.00 TRENCH RESURFACE (SF) 22,760 3.00 68,280.00 SUBTOTAL $98,780.00 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST $1,408,285.00 ENGINEERING/STAKING/TESTING @15% 211,242.75 CONTINGENCY @ 20 % 281,657.00 TOTAL $1,901,184.75 THIS PRELIMINARY OPINION AS TO COSTS IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS A GUARANTEE OF COSTS. N.C.E.•HAS NO CONTROL OVER THE COSTS OF LABOR,MATERIALS,EQUIPMENT,FUTURE MARKET CONDITIONS OR CONTRACTOR'S BIDDING METHODS. THE ACTUAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION MAY VARY FROM THE ESTIMATES AND/OR THE PROJECT BUDGET. (CC)K:\QPROPRVT\RDK\TECO_UPG.WQ2 PRICE LIST UPDATED 6-1-94 A-9 APPENDIX B - HYDROLOGY Page Methodology B-1 10-year hydrographs, existing basin B-2 25-year hydrographs, existing basin B-55 10-year hydrographs, Hwy 41 storm drain B-108 25-year hydrographs, Hwy 41 storm drain B-126 10-year hydrographs, Marchant Ave. drainage B-144 25-year hydrographs, Marchant Ave. drainage B-180 Run-off curve number summary B-216 Time-of-concentration and travel time calculations B-228 SCS TR-55 Run-off curve numbers for urban areas B-237 10-year, 24-hour precipitation isopluvials B-238 25-year, 24-hour precipitation isopluvials B-239 FIGURES Figure 6 Existing Drainage Base, Time of Concentration Figure 7 Existing Drainage Base, Summary of Flows Figure 8 Post-Improvement Drainage Basin, Time of Concentration Figure 9 Post-Improvement Drainage Basin, Summary of Flows METHODOLOGY The Soil Conservation Services (SCS) b ( ) Taular Hydrograph Method as described in their Technical Report 55 (TR 55) was used to determine peak flows and storage volumes within the Amapoa/Tecorida drainage basin. This method was chosen over the Rational Method due to the size of the drainage basin and the complexities associated with routing hydrographs through the various sub-basins. It must be realized that runoff calculations are an attempt to simulate a natural occurrence (rainfall and runoff) using a mathematical model. There are a considerable number of variables such as the condition of the soil, ground cover, the proportion of pervious and impervious surfaces that will have will have an effect on the actual runoff calculated for a given storm. An attempt to simulate these conditions are reflected in the value of CN, the runoff curve number, used in the calculations. Recommended values of CN are shown on the tables in Appendix B. The Tabular Hydrograph Method provides an approach to estimating peak discharges from urban areas using the time of concentration and travel time. This method develops hydrographs for each sub-drainage area or basin and then routes them through the drainage basin resulting in a composite hydrograph at the point of analysis. This method can readily predict the increase in peak flow when all or a portion of the watershed is to be developed. In the case of this study, peak flows were determined assuming ultimate build-out under the current zoning. Appendix B includes a break-down of the zoning for each sub-basin. The Time of Concentration (TC) is defined as the time it takes for runoff to travel from the hydraulically most distant part of the watershed to the point of analysis. Appendix B includes time-of-concentrations and travel time to the various analysis;points. Using the SCS Tabular Hydrograph Method, peak flows for both the 1'0-year and the 25- year storm event have been determined at thirteen critical points within the Am a oa/Tecorida drainage p ainage basin. Once the overflow from the lake spillway channel has be adequately addressed, these flows can be used to size facilities in a consistent manner throughout the drainage basin. res ��..\\ ��.f .J,I r� .-r 4^''�`�`,4�,�'��\ �v• ,'��r•��✓ ,i },Iii .. `''�\ \. i .:y ✓ '' ,. ••~`•�.�.w ti� t 7,' ,� � 11{ i \ - �I �`,t. i 1 r j� '\ � .r `�1, � \� fr \ ,•'-'tel;\: t i (i •.� t�� re rfi� 1 � KrE1,r!t ,�.y ,.'L�'L `i '� ',,,„ I i �� ( ;i � i f ane. � ;.�,' ( ♦ .-,,�'tiii �� �g ' `'I I,�. �' _. LY .. 5 •.i`r• 7-,. 4: �\ r t r �( �4A ' ,� '�i I ii 9b t.�•`' ~ll r �.,p yk \r:, ,` .;�`t ``•t +f t rr rr � `•t► r + it `•`L � I 1 t( •' I :ti r i '`�- •f r, 1 /IJP '` ' i .' ' - � I `, t•. t 1 �71I� i r l _ ,.•.r r.f:.:��. _ '�:' i )a�'r ! m � �{ rr -; W 6l •lf`': if ` �j�7 t�}fit` n� 'Ltlkr `� .,/ `+t V --, � y,' ~` I ,'trt I{ !` f �•, f � � f � , I I 1,i i r r 1 + i', .. y. '_�"' � 1 I i i. (t �. � ���n;' i ,lir. d1 �� i' ''r ? �tj I 3` ( f :` �-..1_ :�•' -.. '14,s. '';�r•..,t `'� �'` ��'' � �.!f itf ' .� %� lt •:� t,, �''j l j f (h t� .'r� (r•'i f �� 4;.� ,'� ' ^r r'!r :•j l:Nd '� i`/` � it ..n(. � �i 1 ,,•r (n/ ( i '. .l 4.4 �� � ,r j` r , , ; r l ! •, � i ° i h,It .'�^, .,.I �' ,• i `t r�:1 w//:i tT /7 r ' (f J � �,•�.� Q! i �, i+.jj��� t\ is , `•�� � ••.;� \ ..».... r" ��C.-.i",'�� .- t� t�i i { �1 �! 4. ��4 1 i.!'r ij, ,.I /,Kik~�'. {�'�,4';='t l`1 �4 , ',j� •t � �%^ ri- \i L `;fit!`�� ( "`` `r. , , � jN) 1 (� r''�•` `•r� -y ' `' !.f� �'r�-i' f '�.,;'r f.� \a„ 11-'� , �' '� kk , 1 (t JV r,y} �".�f� •v; 4�r I� ,', t•;r4 ; '� `i ,, .�' ; .� -�', ���.I l,``i� 4 I I �, 1� ,,�--�'-`' ', 3�� , � -kc: 4,�,. �'•�. `��'`°• jJ" - f y�'' �. t P ,...�••1`/�� i} � ('�r 'r;� `.,,# '�.`�y ,"• y=�y�/'._, .�'i�:...�F 4�.:�� 4�•,.�J `' `•. 1 1 f 4 +»� A `" !r i 'f.it"� �fr{rr ,.••...e-, �, ',l A { f Ji .. j ' �, ,I,..••' i i` ( I. il.�. CID if �, ii ' '� � r �{ �ilk^- (f �• i Its 'i `•,•s '^I ( I I i+ ''+�`t'.i._ti ii.r � ,,;, � e �' `1;i �L' J i I g. '.� .� l 1 1�i •.4 +�w 1 '� I J .Uf�u.: i\:._ to if i� '�f i �' I 1 r�r f � , I ,` s.i i �i j ry .,41• 'A E', r `/ ,tl r. `� }' i r ,iri `� i�F 1 i r` .� ,.� +5 J` L`,� •+ '4 �, ••''� ',� � i '� r' +` i q'1 � 1111 t .. (( S 'S -' •. ✓ i ;<-.. •i ,� i t f�t � ! iJ� ' i I � � I 1 r^.'I ``. i f ,d• y i t `' •� �•°'� � L,, \ f" � `� � ,- ;_ - `qty, ••` � l -'� �_ � � � -���,r '';5�,, �r�"`_-•• , `L ' i.p t ( l �j, 'Iil t ,.y1 t1 ,1..�•.i kki ii` i i�'r r {,l r r%` .''i 1 , I j( i�S. y �� f 1 � i � `',� } ! ��-�,r •` "--i 44+. `` �L'r `�¢M'w r/, ., ;d .�'�-�ul� ±... (. �1-_', �i� ' �'i�! �' t''i• If ,1 t r `'', r ` -...Y ,,� ..,, , •y.`� Lti •L / Ap jam, ��...'; .� � �,.f tl ,•. r oi co L , 1 1 J l r m a � a -� 0 M Zm > m M a 0 CO) to I m ° Oi — :o A Z cno © M c m Al FIGURE 6 Tc=.41 AMAPOA/TECORIDA 1 MASTER DRAINAGE STUDY A2 EXISTING DRAINAGE BASIN 1 Tc=.18 TIME OF CONCENTRATION 2 400 A3 A4 Tc=.6 «� Tc=.5 i 3 Clul C2 C3 C56 B3 Tc=.2 Tc=.17 Tc=.3T Tc=.16 4 10 8 CA N Lo C6 Tc=.19 B1 B2 C7it Tc—.35 Tc=.17 Tc=.14 5 11 9 Tt=.04 64 B6 C4 Tc=.29 Tc=.41 Tc=.41 Tc-.37 12 6 Tt=.08 Tt=.10 B5 00 0 Tc=.36 ;! C9 Tc TIME OF CONCENTRATION, HRS Tc=.4 Tt TRAVEL TIME, HRS 7 SUBBASIN RUNOFF FC 6 COMPONENT cn - z � vANALYSIS POINT 2 (AP2) & Q :3O2 HYDROGRAPH COMBINATION � v N POINT i— CHANNEL ROUTING Al FIGURE 7 85 AC AMAPOA/TECORIDA 1 MASTER DRAINAGE STUDY co to co 0) A2 34 AC EXISTING DRAINAGE BASIN cf a SUMMARY OF FLOWS 2 A3 N A4 51 AC C 36 AC 3 M) M d� 4 C1 C2 C3 C5 83 d cv 40 AC 6 AC 20 AC 11 AC 6 AC 4 10 8 M i �o C6 1. B1 cF c7" B2 C7 cr- & cv 11 AC 17 AC 14 AC 14 AC 5 11 Q,a=91 9 Q2f114 :o 64 B6 �, C8 C4 13 AC 31 AC 12 6 18 AC 24 AC Q10=51 Q��187 Q2j=67 Q2e=245 B5 c 20 AC 14, C9 a c" 14 AC Q25 25-YEAR PEAK FLOW, CFS Q10 10-YEAR PEAK FLOW, CFS 7 SUBBASIN RUNOFF V) C6 COMPONENT N Q w r, ibv to ANALYSIS POINT 2 (AP2) & CfQ j CV O HYDROGRAPH v COMBINATION POINT CHANNEL ROUTING Al FIGURE 8 1 Tc=.41 AMAPOA/TECORIDA MASTER DRAINAGE STUDY A2 POST-IMPROVEMENT Tc=.18 TIME OF CONCENTRATION 0 u, 2 B4 B5 D1 co Tc-.29 Tc—.36 Tc=.28 A3 A4 Tc=.63 a, Tc=.52 f-- 3 W 13 TO H WY 101Tt=.03Tt=.04 CH AN N EL HIGHWAY 41 STORMDRAIN C1 C2 C3 C5 B3 Tc=.27 Tc=.17 Tc=.35 Tc=.16 Tc=.16 4 10 8 N C6 B1 N B2 o i Tc=.19 i C7 Tc=.35 Tc=.17 Tc=.14 5 11 9 Tt=.04 B6 Cg C4 Tc=.29 Tc=.29 Tc=.37 TTt=.10 Tc TIME OF CONCENTRATION, HRS IR F6 C9 Tt TRAVEL TIME, HRS Tc=.44 SUBBASIN RUNOFF COMPONENT - 7 � ANALYSIS' POINT 2 (AP2) & Z 6 O HYDROGRAPH _ COMBINATION POINT U Q CHANNEL ROUTING :210 MARCHANT AVENUE DRAINAGE Al FIGURE 9 (D-1 85 AC AMAPOA/TECORIDA MASTER DRAINAGE STUDY A2 POST-IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY 34 AC OF FLOWS � rn d cf' 2 84 B5 D1 13 AC 20 AC 36 AC A3 C.4 A4 51 AC d cdv�" 36 AC QQio=195 3 o=143 12 Qo=187 13 TO HWY 101 g1d=213 Q2g-271 CHANNEL czs288 HIGHWAY 41 STORMDRAIN C1v B3 40 AC6 AC 4 8 C6 81 cf c l B2 �" - v Tc=.1s C7 cf cf' c#' cB' 17 AC 14 AC 14 AC 5 11 Qos91 9 Q1�114 B6 C8 C4 31 AC 18 AC 24 AC 6 Qio=174 02e=225 Q25 25—YEAR PEAK FLOW, CFS N M C9 Q10 10—YEAR PEAK FLOW, CFS 14 AC C6 SUBBASIN RUNOFF COMPONENT q.:r ANALYSIS POINT 2 (AP2) & OHYDROGRAPH M wg COMBINATION POINT J —►--- CHANNEL ROUTING � � MARCHANT AVENUE DRAINAGE APPENDIX C - ATASCADERO LAKE HYDRAULICS The following calculations are from the Amapoa/Tecorida flood study prepared by John Kennaly Engineering in August 1981. These calculations are the basis of the recommended lake channel spillway improvements. Final design of these improvements should include a thorough hydrologic and hydraulic analysis of the lake and the lake spillway. Two methods of routing were used for the determination of discharge from Atascadero Lake. A simple hydrologic method with a working equation of I + I + 2SI _ __ 2S I 2 0I 2 + 02 produced a at Qt 'peak outflow of 380 cfs for the 100 year storm occurrence. The Muskingum method with a working equation of 0 2 2= C I + C I + C 0 0 I I 2 I produced a peak outflow of 360 cfs for the 100 year storm occurrence. The results of the Muskingum method were chosen as a more repre- sentative discharge rate because it assumes a narrow shallow channel which is representative of Atascadero Lake. The discharge from Atascadero Lake flows down the spillway channel, under Morro road (through an existing 54" CMP) & into Atascadero Creek. During a 10 year storm occurrence , there is sufficient capacity through the existing 54" CMP to accommodate the lake discharge. However, during the 100 year storm occurrence the elevation of Atascadero Creek is such that it causes a backflow of 120 CFS from the creek. Therefore, the lake discharge plus the additional backflow from the creek, adds 480 cfs to the Amapoa- Tecorida drainage basin. The following calculations illustrate both methods of routing used. ROUTING THROUGH UNCONTROLLED RESERVOIRS iFor Peak Flow Period, 100 Year Storm I , cfs 2525 at - O, cfs dt + O, cfs O_, cfs 69. 19 0 213 106 . 50 143. 93 4593. 50 4920 . 58 163 . 54 183. 15 5136. 46 5501. 65 1.82 . 60 182 . 04 5237. 40 5608 . 14 185 . 37 188. 70 5254. 63 5671. 25 208 . 31 227. 92 5331. 69 5853. 02 260 . 66 293. 41 5499. 34 6154 . 24 327. 45 361. 49 5592. 55 6344 . 76 376 . 11 390. 72 5703. 89 6463. 13 379 . 62 368. 52 5720. 38 6415 . 61 347 . 62 326 . 71 5652 . 38 6257. 33 302 . 48 278. 24 5597. 52 6102 . 30 252 . 34 226 . 44 5487. 66 5898. 36 205 . 35 184 . 26 . 5354. 65 5713 . 55 179 . 45 174. 64 5220. 95 5590 . 58 184 . 82 194. 99 5235. 18 5638. 85 201. 84 208. 68 5338. 16 5732 . 95 197. 40 186 . 11 5322 .60 5652 . 27 164 . 84 143. 56 5135 . 16 5422. 28 143 . 56 143. 56 4976. 44 5249 . 50 136 . 53 129. 50 4923. 47 5173. 59 125 . 06 120. 62 4774. 94 5008. 04 116 . 55 112 . 48 4723. 45 4941. 01 108 . 78 MUSKINGUM METHOD OF ROUTING For Peak Flow Period, 100 Year Storm I , cfs 0, CFS @ X = 0. 40 O,CFS @ X = 0 . 30 2 . 59 0 0 69. 19 28 . 22 30 . 34 188. 70 124 . 25 124 . 49 390. 72 280 . 57 281. 20 226 . 44 356 . 65 339. 17 208. 68 187. 23 196 . 60 129. 50 135. 79 176 . 43 98. 05 116 . 14 106 . 81 74 . 37 r MUSKINGUM METHOD OF ROUTING For Peak Flow Period, 10 Year Storm I , cfs O, cfs @ X = 0 . 40 O, cfs @ X = 0 . 30 4. 25 O 0 17. 01 O O 36 ,73 O O 47. 95 O O 48. 33 2.22 3. 25 48. 33 11. 64 11. 18 56. 84 19. 34 17. 87 78. 88 21. 26 20 . 80 105. 95 17. 93 20. 68 114. 84 17. 47 23. 04 100. 15 31. 69 35 . 30 78. 49 45. 12 54 . 12 60. 71 67. 29 68. 82 46. 79 79. 56 75. 89 39. 05 82. 42 77. 33 36. 73 76. 47 74 . 16 44. 08 75. 17 68. 54 Cw = Z SO �%�'i✓ /Cu ! l%� .S%a�`L� G-��'i/lam', �� !�i:-�i`%Ai,/ c��/L /�%tii-%f i-:l�iC�O �'i1F�.�' �:ic'f✓FS �'O.S��' ls%/✓ �9ii�r=� , y' G>E'�.9���F o.� %�%F" /✓�.�1,�/ LEl/<=L C GUT��), -'. r.✓/s .S/i�`U,s'i^-iG`r� �vvr' 1,2 1"7 73 1412 w - e2 ,/S = 966.06 `�flFir�•.�Di1F•, /�Fi�?i�il c�G c�i���/C�" _' �0.�:'9 r w I j � o � 1 I � P sz y� I Ra I _ � v j %Q � ti Al � v . Q i 0 i o e ! o Who I iYo%�Gi»7�" Cri e r, � .. rJ J 41 ,_ry rs ` ! rJ l•J rq 1 \ . crr Jl i rJJ \ OZ. 1 �J 1 I 1 11 p c IN • �l . _,o � � �, "; � o � P �_ � . . : � � �� -; �, -� ``� � O h �° � � : _°, �` .' � � -, .� l � � , ��: v ��� � � �; � � �,. v '� - � __ r V _ \°� Cil' `f �i r� ---- _ . O O h i � � P ! �� � � �' .�. • iPOUT//'✓lj /..•- !�'�Y.c - `%GiY.y�G� �'i`�i�i`�l'/%j ,G'r�`'c•�'f%�/�'.i:d:.:-,,c:r:` 29X./06 ' Lp 9/0 9/2 Af = �4g,;Ge ., 62x/0 p �f, 9/6 ;q.J x-2-�� .2,9 V, =Zi, 29 x✓a6- 12-4y/0�7,,-rl2-1 ll)2 -:7 /-77 Y /�f c = 29. 04 SFG 1-41 el =60. S7 SAO = 2.e 9 X/O 66. ?'�% �%_�/.���'/may - /. 9fz x/G',� �/9G?ri✓":`� 7.( x/O 6 G'f- 7-'. zz- 71j- /. FFG' �. ;•/ ;.i' Gi..:� ^;"=? � C':j '/`�iC%�%Jf l'L%L3T7.�;}c:1.-' Fj�G�•i 7:=,/.iG!".:/. elAl /. 171 C, 20 s/z 2: N= G, 5� ='� CY l .c Y//. O) C. 27 L'FS c,= z.(7 Cc' G+47 v 3.0 =7 CY - /7. ��i::•v^1''/1= -90, 22 2.S�7- 6- -2/2 .�.a ?` •�: �j •.J u i�.:. �V . - � �•�-/1�':� alt/-E�/% :�' l�V: `,•=�f 7`l";'. ;.c� ICi_li t s.i'•.-t'r i` .. //r/���.' r•��' sr/1%J/��r✓w �: ...L T?;I- III �I72. . F' _ . _. _ \` ._ ...- -..._ _.. �� m �•.� _ .. . _.. .. '� � --� �� �` 1� - _ .. . . . . . .... _ _ - - . .. + O ry �� �� T. ;. �� 1 1 1� .. __ __.r-. .. O ... ._. _ _.. � \ `l` `' \ J `` _ �y _ _ �-� --.. -- ��, �: ;� _ �., . _ . . . :� \ � �; __ _ � V CU ;:- � �.� o= a: • h o � j 3 . .... .... .. . . . . . . C,., N N33UO OU3CVOSVIV ('OJ OeSf80 SfM NrS) VO bti3OVOSVIV 10 Al1O ca.. ch S 3113 0 H d 0 0 013 o i fe.aw j .i JN3Dr LV;Cf 3`�r N`l�i AJN 39H 3:v3 lrtl3C33 — o V I ° � .I J 'J ° ° Z 1 ° °Z LL F < N 1 � °o F4 , - C6 C6 Ix r cc W 1 O N Q • Z J Q N H O z b W Z U W •� J N Q W W LL Z = � W ^� - _T G � W O N I � Kit L , r _ f i —r i a IGACN 133d1 NOUVA3.3 M E M O R A N D U M : - - - - - -,- - - - - 1112-?TO: CITY MANAGER i L April 23 .�--- p 1981 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: Amapoa-Tecorida Drainage Moratorium BACKGROUND 1. Description of Problem: On February 21, 1978 the County Board of Supervisors established a moratorium prohibiting the construction of new structures in a specified area until measures were taken to remove the threat of flooding. The problem results primarily from building in a low area subject to storm water runoff from a large area of surrounding higher lands. Existing structures (mostly single family residences) obstruct drainage paths and are susceptible to damage during periods of heavy rain as the result of storm water accumulation. Some of the area is too flat for ade- quate drainage to occur and water accumulates once the ground has become saturated. It is anticipated that further devel- opment in the area will increase the negative effects of the drainage problem rather than retard it. A possible solution involving improvement to existing channels and culverts and construction of two storm drains was promoted by the County Engineering Department. Effort was made to form an assessment district to implement this plan but the lack action has resulted in the status quo. 2 . Summary of Past Actions : February 6 , 1978 - Board of Supervisors considers letter from County Engineer and, by motion, establishes development standards for the area including minimum floor elevations , fill restrictions , and drainage obstruction prohibition. Furthermore, the County Planning Department is directed to advise property owners of availability and advisability of flood hazard insurance . February 14 , 1978 - Board of Supervisors directs County En- gineer to prepare a petition for circulation in the area to determine the degree of interest in formation of an assessment district. Page Two Memorandum: Amapoa-Tecorida Drainage Moratorium April 23 , 1981 February 21, 1978 - Board of Supervisors adopts emergency ordinance establishing building moratorium in subject area. April 18 , 1978 - County Engineering Department conducts in- formational meeting and circulates petition for the for- mation of an assessment district to construct drainage improvements . August 21 , 1978 - Board of Supervisors considers letter requesting that the moratorium be lifted and receives and files request with no action. February 20, 1979 - Board of Supervisors considers request from Atascadero Advisory Committee that the moratorium be lifted. Board refers matter back to Staff in order to review size of assessment district with consideration towards enlarging it and to meet with people in area to find out how they .can help themselves and at what cost. July 2 , 1979 - Atascadero incorporation becomes effective. July 10, 1979 - Engineering Department memo reports that Cal Trans will do no work since there is no threat to State facilities. Memo also reports no work done on district size and indicates question is moot in view of incorporation. 3 . Current Status: The moratorium ordinance, codified as Section 19 . 56 , was adopted by the City at the same time as other County ordin- ances were adopted. It remains in effect and no concerted action has been taken to develop adequate drainage facilities to mitigate the flooding problems . During the last two wet-weather seasons , City Staff has made an effort to observe the flooding problems . Observation indi- cates that localized flooding continues and worsens as the ground becomes saturated later in the season. There is con- siderable run-off in existing channels for several months after the rains . A number of "make-shift" drainage channels have been made by residents to divert water away from existing structures generally into roadways or nearby vacant land. It should be noted that the last two wet-weather seasons have not been extraordinary in volume or amount of rainfall . Page Three Memorandum; Amapoa-Tecorida Drainage Moratorium April 23 , 1981 • The Staff has also discussed the moratorium with numerous individuals generally suggesting that a joint effort be launched to facilitate solution to the flooding problems , but no apparent action has resulted from this suggestion. A preliminary proposal affecting a portion of the flood hazard area was submitted and reviewed by the City Engineer who found it to be inadequate in terms of handling the vol- ume of run-off. 4 . Land Use and Zoning: The subject area includes single family development and zoning generally along Azucena, Atascadero, San Francisco, and Teco- rida. The Morro Road area includes mixed commercial and residential development but is .planned for future special commercial use. Alcantara and Amapoa as well as portions of Morro Road and Tecorida are developed with mixed residential use and planned for high density residential development. The total number of lots with the moratorium boundaries is 140 . , ALTERNATIVES . In evaluating the flooding problem and the current status of the moratorium, there are a number of alternatives that can be con- sidered. These include: 1. Adopt an ordinance to rescind the moratorium and let the individuals cope with the flooding problem. 2 . Adopt an ordinance which rescinds the moratorium, but simul- taneously replace it with certain development standards intended to minimize the impacts to individual structures . 3 . Adopt an ordinance which rescinds the moratorium but simultan- eously replace it with certain development standards intended to minimize the impacts to individual structures and with a participation requirement to contribute to an area-wide solution to the problem. 4 . Retain the moratorium in its present form with adequate flood control measures being developed by' affected property owners . 5 . Retain the moratorium in its present form with the City taking the initiative to devise adequate flood control measures . 6 . Retain the moratorium but expand its size to include nearby uphill property located in the drainage area. Page Four Memorandum: Amapoa-Tecorida Drainage Moratorium April 23, 1981 _ STAFF COMMENTS It appears that there has been no change in the conditions that _ led to the imposition of the moratorium. There has also been only limited effort to devise solutions to the flooding problem. How- ever, it must be recognized that a solution would have been imple- mented long ago if the problem was an easy one. These difficulties continue because of the number of properties involved, the potential costs of constructing flood control facilities, the inability of the property owners to effectively organize, the apparent lack of desire to pay for improvements, controversy over the seriousness of the flooding problem, and disagreement over the size of the affected area. At present, the number of lot's included in the moratorium is 140 . A number of those owners contend that their particular 1Qt has no flooding problem and should not be included in the moratorium. It has also been noted in the past that many in the moratorium area contend that other lots in the uphill areas should be included in the moratorium, or; at least in an assessment district should one be formed. It is estimated that the number of additional lots in the drainage area is approximately 250 . In 1978 the County Engineering Department advocated some channel work and the construction of two storm drains with a total cost of approximately $300 ,000. The City Public Works Department has reviewed that project and feels that the design and flow criteria were excessive. As a result, additional review of design alter- natives and projected costs is necessary. Preliminary review indicates that a drainage study prepared by a consultant would range between $8, 000 and $15, 000 . While the Public Works Depart- ment does prossess the capability to perform the study, current work loads would not allow for its timely completion unless other projects, including day-to-day activities are assigned a lesser priority. As has been noted previously, the County made at least some effort to facilitate the formation of an assessment district but received little support from area residents . In the last nine months or so, members of the City Staff have discussed the matter with quite a number of area residents suggesting that a strong expression of interest from the affected property owners would result in City assistance in forming an assessment district. Despite such sug- gestions, nothing has been forthcoming . It may be desirable to consider a more direct action in this regard by organizing a meeting, etc . , to determine the actual detree of interest in the approach. Page Five Memorandum: Amapoa-Tecorida Drainage Moratorium April 23 , x.981 Much has been made of the assessment district alternative and this seems to be a practical approach since those benefitted by the improvements would be those who would pay for them. The selection of Alternative #1 would indicate that the flooding problem is not serious enough to warrant concerted action by the City. The question that would obviously be raised is whether or not, under the general authority of the police power, the City is responsible for undertaking measures such as moratorium, more restrictive development standards , etc. to protect the area from flooding. This judgement may be a difficult one to justify if consideration is given to past County actions and to current knowledge of the flood hazard in the area. Nevertheless , this alternative should be considered in light of public opposition to the moratorium. Some notice of- the flooding problem could be provided to current and future owners in conjunction with this alternative. Alternatives 2 and 3 suggest that development standards replace the moratorium. Examples of such standards could include minimum floor elevations for new construction; curb, gutter, sidewalk_ and road improvements ; paved driveways ; culvert and drainage channel modifications or improvements; and similar. The biggest drawback to this approach is that it would be piecemeal since it would be implemented over a period of years as development occurs . Even if such improvements -were done in conformance to an overall plan their effectiveness might be limited by the time frame. Also, costs for area wide problems would likely be unequally spread with owners at critical areas in the basin having the burden of more substantial improvements. It should also be understood that continuted development will compound the flooding problem to the detriment of now-developed lots . It is also suggested that a participation requirement or drainage fee be tied to development but this has the same disadvantages suggested in the preceding paragraph. Furthermore, a fee program would be similar to the county' s road deposit tax which has negative connotations . The fourth alternative represents the status quo. Thus far it has had no beneficial results as property owners have not been able to effectively organize to deal with this area wide problem. Their ability to do so is constrained by their numbers and by lack of knowledge concerning possible costs . Page Six Memorandum: Amapoa-Tecorida Drainage Moratorium April 23 , 1981 If alternative five is selected, it would place the City in a position of attempting to organize and inform area property owners. This could occur through a meeting or hearing on the matter with the effort directed towards generating support for a solution (probably an assessment district) . This could mitigate one of the criticisms made on the moratorium which has been lack of City action. However, it should not be con- fused with City funding for any such solution. The last alternative suggests enlarging the size of the moratorium to include those which contribute the run-off as well as those who accept it. This approach is likely to generate objections from property owners not currently subject to the moratorium. Certainly their properties are not exposed to the same degree of flood hazard as the others but their contribution to the flooding should nevertheless be a factor. It may be desirable to leave such properties out of moratorium restrictions but include them in participation in the ultimate solution. Perhaps , some general discussion of possible flood control measures mentioned for alternatives 4, 5 and 6 is also appropriate. The two basic concerns are flow within the area and flow from the area to an acceptable outlet. It can be anticipated that flow within the area will have to be channelized with preference given to open channels. This would be accompanied by culverts under driveways and roads . Some need may exist to pave or other- wise improve any channels depending upon flow rates. Water should be conveyed out of the area to Atascadero Creek west of the free- way to the Creek east of the freeway by enlarging the drainage outlet under the freeway or to the Lake. A combination of the above might also be possible. Some road and curb/gutter improve- ments may also be appropriate. Detailed alternatives should be the focus of any drainage study. RECOMMENDATION The following recommendations are made in conjunction with the Amapoa-Tecorida drainage moratorium: 1. The City should lend its offices in the formation and administration of an assessment district at the instigation of a majority of the benefitting property owners . 2. The City should consider including the entire drainage area in any assessment district. This might require 4/5ths Council vote to override a majority protest by area residents. Page Seven Memorandum: Amapoa-Tecorida Drainage Moratorium April 23 , 1981 . 3. The City should retain a consultant to prepare a drainage study and cost estimates for drainage alternatives to be paid by the area property owners and with these costs of the study transferred to the assessment district if it is formed. 4 . The City should retain the moratorium in its present form until completion of the foregoing. REPORT PREPARED/APPROVED BY: LAWRENC STEVENS Planni Director REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item: B-2 Through: Andy Takata, Meeting Date: April 25, 1995 City Manager Via: Henry Engen, Community Development Director From: Doug Davidson, Senior Planner File No: 1995 CDBG SUBJECT: 1995 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Consideration of the City of Atascadero' s proposed allocation for the County of San Luis Obispo Consolidated Plan. RECOMMENDATION: City staff (City Manager, Department Heads and Senior Planner) advises the City Council to recommend to the County Board of Supervisors that the following allocation of the Consolidated Plan be adopted and forwarded to the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) : City Hall ADA (Request # 1) �+ 25,500 Kids Daycare (Request # 2) $5,000 Rec Center (Request # 4) $25,000 Fire Station #1 (Request # 6) $45,000 Youth Scholarship (Request # 8) $5,000 Loaves & Fishes (Request # 9) $98,100* Transitional Housing (Request # 12) $20,000 Administrative Costs (Request # 18) $25,000 Total 1995 CDBG Grant $248,600 Staff further recommends that the Board approve the Special Urban Projects funding of the CDBG grant as proposed In the Consolidated Plan: Loaves and Fishes $25,025 North County Women' s Shelter $10,000 * Special Grant Conditions The Loaves and Fishes grant is proposed to be subject to the following conditions: 1. The project shall obtain all necessary City permits/approvals and, provide a recorded leaseagreement prior to disbursement of the grant. The recorded lease document shall be submitted to the City by July 1, 1995. 000042 2. The facility shall not contain showers, outside access to the restroom, cooking facilLties, or sleeping quarters. BACKGROUND: In 1994, the cities of Atascadero; Paso Robles, Graver Beach, Pismo" Beach, San Luis Obispo, and the unincorporated areas of the County were designated by HUD as an "urban county" eligible to ' receive annual formula-based entitlements of CDBG funds. Last -year the County received $2,540,000 of CDBG funds, with the City of Atascadero' s portion being $223,500. These 1994, funds were appropriated toward rehabilitation of the Carlton Hotel ($160,000) the Printery ($47,000) , and the remainder ($16,500) for administration. Preparation of the 1995 Consolidated Plan began in the summer of 1994. Workshops were held throughout the County in the fall of 1994 (November 30th in Atascadero) to solicit public comment on housing and community development needs. On December 12, 1994, the County issued a request for CDBG and HOME Investment Partnerships Act (HOME) program proposals for funding through these programs. By the deadline of January 31, 1995, the City had received requests 17 applications for CDBG funding (no requests for HOME funds were received) totaling $906,012. The City' s 1995 CDBG allocation is $248,600. y` ANALYSIS: Z CDBG funds may be used for a variety of community development activities as long as they meet one of the three national objectives: ( 1) A benefit to low and moderate income persons; (2) Aid in the prevention or elimination of blight; (3) Address urgent needs that pose a serious and immediate threat to the health or welfare of the community. Eligible activities for CDBG funds include acquisition of real property, construction or rehabilitation of public facilities and improvements, provision of certain types of public services, relocation payments and assistance, removal of architectural barriers, housing rehabilitation, historic preservation, code enforcement, commercial or industrial rehabilitation, and special economic development activities. Federal regulations require that in order for an activity to qualify under the low and moderate income objective, at least 51 percent of the persons benefitting from the project or program must earn no more than 80 percent of the area median. Furthermore, at least 70 percent of the "urban county" CDBG funds must be expended toward the national objective of directly benefitting low and moderate income individuals. Atascadero' s 2 0000113 h two projects last year provided no direct benefit to low and moderate persons - both projects qualified as elimination of blight due to the unreinforced masonry foundation of the buildings. These projects were able to be funded because the overall County allocation achieved a 70 percent low and moderate income benefit; in other words, other jurisdictions provided more than 70 percent of their funds towards low and moderate income projects to make up for Atascadero' s shortfall. As a matter of fairness, all participating jurisdictions agreed to strive towards the 70-30 percent split within their own jurisdictions in preparing the 1995 plan. In addition to the targeted income groups, the following criteria should also be used to guide selection of CDBG programs: 1. The proposal is consistent with the national objectives and eligibility criteria of the HUD CDBG program; 2. The proposal is consistent with the Urban County Consolidated Plan; 3. The proposal is consistent with the General Plan and other City codes/ordinances. 4. The proposal will achieve multiple community development objectives; 5. The proposal can be implemented in a timely manner, without significant environmental, policy, procedural, legal, or fiscal obstacles to overcome; and 6. The project is not financially feasible without CDBG funding. The following section will analyze each application received in light of the CDBG guidelines and community development needs of Atascadero and conclude with funding recommendations. City Applications 1. American with Disabilities Act (ADA) Compliance project Phase I improvements to the City Administration Building in compliance with ADA. Amounts of CDBG funds requested: $25,500 This appears to be the most important of the requests from the Department of Community Services. The City should make a commitment to removing architectural barriers and improving handicapped access in all its facilities, beginning with City Hall. Furthermore, disabled persons are assumed to be low and moderate income under federal guidelines. Recommended funding: $25,500 is 3 000q,'1114 2. Kids Unlimited Extended Da care Pro ram Y g Enhancement of the Kids Unlimited Daycare program including purchase of new equipment, expanded youth programs, staff training, and to maintain State licensing. Amount of CDBG funds requested: $7,600 Public services, including day care, are specifically included as eligible CDBG activities. To qualify under the national objective as a low and moderate project, either the entire area served by the activity must be composed of more than 51 percent low/moderate income people, or the service is limited to a specific group of people, at least 51 percent of whom are low/mod persons. The day care service will serve the Santa Rosa Elementary School District which includes a large part of low and moderate income Census tracts. Since this project has been narrowed in scope from a citywide perspective to coincide with the Santa Rosa district, staff is recommending reducing the funding to $5, 000. Recommended funding: $5,000 3. Recreation Access Project Develop recreational programs for developmentally disabled people. Amount of CDBG funds requested: $18,850 Given the number of applications received, this may not be the year to be undertake new recreational programs, no matter how worthwhile. Not recommended for funding this year 4. Atascadero Recreation Center (The Printery building) Phase II program to supplement and complete the architectural and engineering design work begun in 1994 with an award of $47,000 in CDBG funds. Amount of CDBG funds requested: $50,000 As stated earlier, the Rec Center received $47,000 from the 1994 CDBG allocation. Architectural/engineering services have been obtained for the $47,000 plan preparation and the 1994 funds are now available upon completion of work milestones. The request this year is to supplement and complete plans for the architectural and engineering assessment of the Printery in light of its proposed use as a recreation center. The mechanical portion of this supplemental analysis is the most important and can be accomplished for about half the total amount requested. This seems like a good compromise given the project' s funding from last year and the number of applications received this year. Recommended funding: $25,000 4 5. Charles Paddock Zoo Quarantine Facility • Conversion of an existing service building into indoor quarantine and animal holding areas. Amount of CDBG funds requested: $3,091 This project does not meet a national objective of the CDBG program and is not eligible for funding. Not eligible for funding 6. Hazardous Fire Apparatus Exhaust Clean Air System Installation of collection tubes on the exhaust pipe of each fire apparatus to reduce exposure to gasoline '',and diesel emissions within the fire stations. Amount of CDBG funds requested: Station One $45,000 Station Two $30,000 Everyone is aware of the hazards firefighters face in emergency response situations. They are also exposed to health hazards inside the fire stations. Following the alarm, the fire response vehicle is started immediately inside the station. These fuel emissions, in addition to those caused from backing the vehicle in the station upon its return, have been linked to cancer and other illnesses. The application provides documentation of the 'hazards of fuel emissions for firefighters and the need for ventilation equipment in fire stations. The Hazardous Fire Apparatus Exhaust Clean Air System consists of collection tubes and pump that attach to the exhaust pipe of the fire engine and eliminates discharge of exhaust inside the building. The State Hospital, among other public agencies, have installed the Clean Air system. It seems logical to divide this request - the older, more active station #1 this year and station #2 in 1996. Recommended funding: $45,000 $30,000 ( 1996) 7. Downtown Revolving Loan Fund A revolving loan fund to create, retain, and expand small business opportunities in the downtown area. (This proposal was offered for consideration by Councilman - Carden at the November 29, 1994 City Council meeting. ) Amount of CDBG funds requested: $100,000 These revolving loan programs have been very successful in other communities. Atascadero' s downtown seems like an ideal candidate. However, given the CDBG fundamental objective of benefiting low income people and the number of requests received for these kinds of projects, this loan fund is difficult to fit in this year. Not recommended for funding this year. 10 5 (The County is including a recommendation in the Consolidated Plan to fund the request of the Economic Vitality Corporation ($154,748) to establish a county-wide revolving loan program. The City of Atascadero was not included in the EVC request. The City may want to participate in this type of countywide endeavor in the future if it can be assured of some direct economic benefit in Atascadero. ) Non-Profit Applications 8. Community Services Foundation Youth Activity Scholarship A scholarship fund to assist families of low income youth to participate in organized recreational and social activities. Amount of CDBG funds requested: $5,000 This is an innovative idea, clearly meets the intent of CDBG, and comes with a small price tag. Recommended funding: $5,000 9. Atascadero Loaves and Fishes Center Construction of a Loaves and Fishes center to provide short range assistance to those in need, including areas for registration, interviews, food packaging, storage, refrigeration, records, and a shower. Amount of CDBG funds requested: $133,843 This service benefits a large amount of low and very low income people. It also serves the North County area, making it a recommended candidate for the Special Urban Projects Fund due to its regional function. It has been operating out of local churches for years, while experiencing a substantial growth in the number of people seeking its services. Loaves and Fishes desire the grant funds to construct a new building to provide a more permanent and expanded home for their services on leased land. This makes the project much more feasible than if property acquisition was the purpose of the funds. A side agreement to ensure the recorded lease before this project is funded is appropriate. Recommended funding: $98,100 (City allocation) 25 ,025 (Special Urban Projects Fund) $123,125 (Total CDBG funds) 10. North County Women' s Resource Center Storage facility for the North County Women's Resource Center' s Battered Shelter. Amount of CDBG funds requested: $10,000 6 0001-17 The Women' s Shelter is a classic CDBG project that directly addresses the needs of abused women. In fact, this project was made possible by an earlier State CDBG grant. This facility is also regional in nature and has been recommended for funding from the Special Urban Projects Fund. Recommended funding: $10,000 (Special Urban Projects Fund) 11. Life Steps Foundation Supported Housing for Special Needs Populations (Life Steps Foundation) The acquisition of a four-unit multiple family dwelling using CDBG funds and other sources to supply affordable housing to mothers and their children who successfully complete the program at the Life Steps Alcohol/Drug Free Residential Treatment Facility and for clients; in the Life Steps Community Supported Living Program. Amount of CDBG funds requested: $64,800 This is yet another model project for the use of CDBG funds. It appears, however, that this request is premature. Life Steps has filed similar requests with the County and City of Paso Robles. They have also taken the lead with other social service agencies and asked the County for a feasibility/needs study of $25,000 to ascertain the future nature and location of their facilities. This feasibility study is recommended for funding by the County; and should come first. Furthermore, the site and additional funding are not guaranteed at this time for a site in Atascadero. Not recommended for funding this year 12. _Transitional Housing Program for Disabled Homeless Adults (San Luis Obispo Non-Profit Housing Corporation) The hiring of one additional case manager and one half-time living skills trainer to work with program residents who are in the process of moving from transitional to permanent housing. Amount of CDBG funds requested: $20,000 (This request is $20,000 per year for three years. The same was requested of the City and County of San Luis Obispo. ) The case manager would provide service and training for an existing project - there is a transitional home for disabled adults in Atascadero. This is a point in favor of this request. Programs such as this provide the vital link between obtaining independent housing and becoming productive members of society. This is the more important of the two SLO Non-Profit Housing Corp./Housing Authority requests received this year. In a way, by funding this proposal this year the City implies a commitment, but not a firm obligation, to fund this program in 1996 and 1997 . Recommended funding: $20,000 • 7 13. Family Self-Sufficiency Resource Centers and Case Management (Housing Authority of the City of San Luis Obispo) The hiring of a case manager for the Family Self-Sufficiency program and a planning/feasibility study of countywide resource centers. Amount of CDBG funds requested: $10,000 (The same request was made to the cities of Grover Beach, Paso Robles, and the City and County of San Luis Obispo. ) The Family Self-Sufficiency center supplements the Section 8 housing program. This is another valid program under CDBG guidelines and serves the needs of lower income individuals. It is of similar nature to the above request. With the large number of requests this year and limited funds, the City should choose one of these programs, but not both. The transitional home for disabled adults will serve a greater number of needy people at this time. Not recommended for funding this year Private Party Applications 14. Residential Rehabilitation - 7880 Sinaloa Ave Rehabilitation of a deteriorating original Colony Home, including replacement of windows, roof, plumbing, electrical, and other improvements. Amount of CDBG funds requested: $24,861 Residential rehabilitation is an excellent project for the use of CDBG funds. To make it work, however, it must be conducted on a large scale with one agency responsible for its implementation. For instance, a countywide rehabilitation program with a non-profit housing corporation administering it. The County and other participating jurisdictions are proposing to undertake a rehab program this year. They received few applications. For Atascadero to "go it alone" for two projects is not at all cost effective. Not recommended for funding this year 15. Residential Rehabilitation - 8155 Atascadero Rehabilitation of an Atascadero home, specifically the replacement of a damaged roof. Amount of CDBG funds requested: $1,717 Not recommended for funding - see above discussion 16 . North Coast Affordable Housing Corp. - Oak Leaf Homes (David Brown or Joe Lindsey) 8555 El Centro Tentative Map, EIR, working drawings, and property acquisition of six lots for a residential development. (Proposed project is 25 units, including six units for low and moderate income persons. ) Amount of CDBG funds requested: $205,750 8 0000 _�' The cost of the working drawings and EIR for this project was requested for funding last year. This year, the cost of acquiring the six density bonus units for low and moderate income residents is included in the request. The same argument against funding this project used last year still holds true: granting $205, 000 to environmental studies, plan preparation, and property acquisition for a project which may or may not be approved is not recommended. The project as proposed necessitates a Zone Change and density bonus. (A similar project was denied by the City Council in 1984. ) Not recommended for funding this year 17. O'Reilly Housing Tract - 9244-9248 San Rafael Land acquisition (down payment) for a proposed 10-unit low and moderate income housing project. (The application for this small lot subdivision is being currently reviewed. ) Amount of CDBG funds requested: $150,000 This request has been withdrawn from consideration. 18. Proqram Administration CDBG guidelines allow up to 20 percent of grant funds to be devoted to costs of administering the program. Last year, the City Council allocated 7 percent ($16,500) for administrative costs. The 1994 allocation is on target - while approximately $12,000. 00 in staff time has been spent to date, the major project (Carlton Hotel) has been delayed due to lack of outside financing and potential change of ownership. With seven projects to manage this year, a 10 percent allocation for program administration should be justifiable. Recommended funding: $25,000 CONCLUSIONS• The 1995 CDBG program funding can be summarized as follows: Total 1995 Atascadero CDBG Funding $248,600 Total 1995 CDBG Funding Requested $906,012* * This does not include the City administrative costs. Administrative costs are considered to address CDBG national objectives- these costs are excluded from the total before figuring low/mod percentage. Total dollar amount benefiting low/mod people = $153,600 Grant total (minus admin. costs) _ $223,600 Percentage of low/mod income projects 69% 9 All recommended projects, with the exception of the Recreation Center and Fire Station, are considered to be a direct benefit to low and moderate income persons. The recommended projects address a variety of community development activities, primarily benefitting low and moderate income families. They are ready to proceed without significant legal, financial, or environmental obstacles. Each one will result in a completed project, or a distinct piece of a larger goal, that is not now otherwise possible without the grant funds. 10 REPORT T TO CITY COUNCIL CITY �OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item: B-3 Through: Andrew J. Takata Meeting Date: 04/25/95 City Manager File Number: ZC #94005 From: Henry Engen .{+& Community Development Director SUBJECT: Consideration of a proposed amendment to the text of the Zoning Ordinance relative-to comprehensively amending the- uses- allowed in the CN (Commercial Neighborhood) zone. (Hawkins Plaza) (Golden West) RECOMMENDATION: 1. Ordinance No. 287 - Read by title only and approve on first reading amending the Zoning Ordinance text change. BACKGROUND: This amendment began as a request to change the Land Use Element's designation of the Hawkins Plaza site from Neighborhood Commercial to Retail Commercial. The Planning Commission agreed with staff's concern that this would conflict with the General Plan's goal to create strong specialized commercial nodes along E1 Camino Real. Alternatively, a comprehensive re-write of the uses allowed in the CN zone was agreed to by the applicant to expand the uses that could be accommodated in the district. On February 21, and March 21, 1995, the Planning Commission conducted public hearings on the above-referenced subject. After discussion (see attached minutes excerpts) , the Planning Commission recommended approval of Zone Change #94005 on a 6:0 vote (one Commissioner was absent) . HE:ph Encls: Planning Commission Staff Report - 3/21/95 Planning Commission Minutes Excerpts - 2/21/95 Planning Commission Minutes Excerpts - 3/21/95 Ordinance No. 287 cc: Mike Hawkins Richard Shannon 0000"Z M E M O R A N D U M TO: Planning Commission FROM: Gary Kaiser, Associate Planner GA&I SUBJECT: Continuation of Zone Change #94005 -- A proposed amendment to the text of the Zoning Ordinance relative to uses allowed in the CN (Commercial Neighborhood) zone. DATE: March 21, 1995 RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission should recommend that the City Council: 1. Find that the subject Zoning Ordinance text change would not have a significant effect on the environment and that the Negative Declaration prepared for the project is adequate under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requirements; and 2. Approve Zone Change #94005 based on the Findings and terms contained in the Draft Ordinance (Attachment C) . BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission will recall their consideration of combined General Plan Amendment and Zone Change applications filed by the owners of Hawkins Plaza (Golden West Development) during their regularly-scheduled meeting of February 21, 1995. During this hearing, the applicants expressed their opinion that the Commercial Neighborhood (CN) zone was too restrictive and that the zoning .of the site (Hawkins Plaza) should therefore be changed to Commercial Retail (CR) . The staff report prepared for that meeting, however, articulated staff ' s concern that such a change in the land use designation and zoning of the site may be inconsistent with broader General Plan goals (Attachment A) . The Commission was sympathetic to the applicant' s problem with respect to not being able to lease remaining vacant tenant spaces because of use restrictions imposed by the CN zoning; the Commission also understood and was sensitive to General Plan consistency problems identified by staff. After some discussion, the Commission agreed to reconsider the matter as merely a Zoning Ordinance text change whereby the range of uses allowed within the CN zone would be modified and/or expanded in a manner that reasonably meets the applicant' s needs but does not necessitate a General Plan Amendment and/or compromise the intent and purpose of neighborhood commercial zoning. 000)("� DISCUSSION• SOn several occasions over the years, the Planning Commission has recognized a need to amend the text of the Zoning Ordinance relative to the types of uses allowed in each of the City's various zoning districts. In fact, a complete Zoning Ordinance "overhaul" was initiated by the City Council a couple years ago but, due to staff reductions and the resultant need to redirect available staff resources to other more pressing matters, that project has yet to come to fruition. As discussed at the Commission' s previous hearing on this particular matter, it appears that a re-write of one Section of the Zoning Ordinance is the best and most propitious way to meet the applicant' s needs. Staff sees this as an opportunity to accomplish, in part, what it has already set out to do. As resources permit, other Sections of the Zoning Ordinance in need of a re-write will be brought to the Commission for consideration. Since the Commission' s initial consideration of this matter on February 21, 1995, staff has conducted an Initial Study to determine whether such a City-wide y wide amendment of the CN zone, as proposed, would have significant effects on the environment. The fact that specific development projects subsequently proposed in the CN zone would undergo separate environmental review was duly noted. Although the City and owners of property within the CN zone may benefit financially from the proposed text amendment, no potentially significant environmental effects were identified. A draft Negative Declaration has therefore been prepared for the project in accordance with the requirements of California' s Environmental Quality Act (Attachment B) . CONCLUSION• The February 21, 1995 staff report previously prepared for the subject Zone Change application explains the reasoning behind the General Plan' s designation of Neighborhood Commercial areas. In a nutshell, the basic framework for planning commercial development in Atascadero depends on the recognition of neighborhood -- as well as tourist -- needs and the establishment of strategically located nodes wherein the provision of such specialized commercial services should occur for the sake of convenience as well as City-wide economic vitality. Whereas the expansion of allowable CN uses could easily go too far and circumvent the purpose of the CN zone and thus jeopardize this critically important planning tool, staff feels the proposed re- write of the CN zone would only advance, not compromise, General Plan goals in this regard. Attachments: Attachment A -- February 21, 1995 staff report Attachment B -- Negative Declaration Attachment C -- Draft Ordinance 287 00001-4 H I I At-riMtIV 1 H 2/21/95 STAFF REPORT ZC 494005 (HAWKINS PLAZA, CITY OF ATASCADERO Item: B . 4 STAFF REPORT FOR: Planning Commission Meeting Date: February 21, 1995 BY: Gary Raiser, Associate Planner GK File No: GPA #94004 ZC #94005 SUBJECT: Consideration of General Plan Amendment request to change the land use designation of certain real property from "Neighborhood Commercial" to "Retail Commercial. " A Zone Change is also being requested to change the zoning of the site accordingly (from CN to CR) . RECOMMENDATION• The Planning Commission should recommend to the City Council that General Plan Amendment #94004 and Zone Change #94005 be denied based on the Findings contained in Attachment F. SITUATION AND FACTS: 1. Applicant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Hawkins Plaza Ltd. 2. Representative.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Golden West Development 3. Project Address. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9955 & 9965 El Camino Real 4. Legal Description. . . . . . . . . . . . .Units 1 - 8, Tract 2107 5. Site Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1. 16 acres 6. Existing Use. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Shopping Center 7. Environmental Status. . . . . . . . . .Statutorily Exempt ANALYSIS• The project is a request that both the General Plan' s Land Use Map and Official Zoning Map be changed relative to certain real property located at 9955 & 9965 El Camino Real (Attachments A & B) . Located at the intersection of E1 Camino Real and E1 Bordo Avenue, the site contains a shopping center -- Hawkins Plaza. As shown by Attachments A & B, the site is designated for Neighborhood Commercial use, with surrounding properties designated for either Neighborhood Commercial or High Density Multiple Family use. The applicants desire a change in the land use designation and zoning of the- site to Retail Commercial. 1 0000;; Background The site was designated for High Density Multiple Family Use under the 1980 General Plan. In 1984, the General Plan designation and zoning of this site and an adjacent lot (Hoover's Hacienda) was changed to Commercial Retail. At that time, there was a commercial motel ( 19th Hole Motel) on the site which the property owner planned to expand and renovate. Based on the 1984 staff reports and minutes, the Planning Commission recommended approval of this change based in large part on the fact that these two existing uses were non-conforming and could therefore not be substantially altered or expanded. Although the Retail Commercial designation of the site persisted after 1984, ownership of the property changed and motel expansion plans were dropped. In 1991, a conditional use permit (CUP) application was approved by the Planning Commission for the demolition of existing motel structures and construction of a new shopping center. Between building permit issuance and completion of site improvements two significant events occurred. First, the General Plan designation and zoning of the site (and the adjacent Hoover's Hacienda site) was changed to Neighborhood Commercial as part of the 1992 General Plan Update. Second, a tentative tract map was approved which established the present condominium-type ownership pattern. Effect of Proposed General Plan/Zoning Changes The 1991 CUP approval locks-in the type, location, size and style of all site improvements. Any proposal to substantially modify existing site improvements may be approved by CUP reconsideration regardless of whether the land use designation and zoning is Neighborhood Commercial or Retail Commercial. Within the CN zone, retail activities and restaurants are "allowed by right" if less than 1000 square feet; the same uses occupying greater than 1000 square feet are allowed by CUP. This current square footage limitation has little effecton this particular site, however, as a CUP (and tract map) for the larger tenant spaces has already been approved. As opposed to the General Plan and Zoning changes approved in 1984, the changes now being requested do not make existing non-conforming'' uses conforming and would not affect the property owner's ability to renovate or expand existing improvements. The reason for the requested General Plan and zoning changes is to expand the range of allowable uses (or tenants) within existing buildings. In their written request for the changes, the applicants provide examples of uses they feel are appropriate for the site (Attachment C) . These uses are not allowed under the current Neighborhood Commercial designation but would be allowed under the proposed Retail Commercial designation. 2 '000T__� A complete list of uses allowed and conditionally allowed in the CN (Commercial Neighborhood) and CR (Commercial Retail) zones are contained in Attachments D & E, respectively. Internal Consistency State law not only requires that zoning be consistent with the General Plan,- it also requires that the General Plan -- with its various Elements and maps -- be internally consistent. Since only the General Plan's Land Use Map is proposed to be changed, the Planning Commission must consider whether the proposed changes would be consistent with the remaining General Plan text. As mentioned above, the Neighborhood Commercial designation of the site was established in 1992 as part of a comprehensive update of the General Plan's Land Use, Conservation and Open Space Elements. These- 1992 General Pian changes resulted in more than revised Land Use and Zoning Maps; these changes constituted a complete re-write of these three General Plan Elements. In discussions of commercial areas in general, the Land Use Element now contains the following language: "The most challenging goal of the General Plan is to reverse the strip commercial image of the City by implementing a land use strategy which encourages and establishes the creation of strong specialized nodes along El Camino Real to meet the wide variety of commercial, retail and service needs of the City and its trade area. " (Page II-12) "As a post-Proposition 13 City containing over 24 square miles of land, 23 square miles of which is residential in nature, it is imperative that a sound economic base be assured. Towards this end, it is the City's policy to: (1) develop a strong and attractive downtown, (2) provide for conveniently located neighborhood shopping areas; . . . ) " (Page II-13) Under discussions of Neighborhood Commercial areas in particular, the Land Use Element states: "Neighborhood commercial areas are intended to meet the day- to-day shopping and service needs of immediately surrounding neighborhoods. " (Page II-13) The Land Use Element goes on to identify specific areas ideal for Neighborhood Commercial designation, as follows: "The primary locations proposed for neighborhood commercial nodes are at the intersections of El Camino Real and Del Rio, San Anselmo, El Bordo, Viejo Camino and Santa Barbara roads. " (Page II-13, emphasis added) 3 0000"1. 7 The E1 Bordo intersection, which is the project site, is indeed an ideal location for neighborhood-serving uses. Given its location amid many existing and planned high-density residential uses, limiting the site to containing primarily neighborhood- serving uses does indeed promote General Plan policies, such as those referenced above, as well as those which call for reduced vehicular traffic, air pollution, etcetera. As long as the General Plan text identifies this particular location as being ideal for Neighborhood Commercial designation, a re-designation of the site through mapping only would create an internal consistency problem. Having the applicant simply add a text change proposal to the proposed mapping changes is not staff' s recommendation, however. It is staff's opinion that as long as the General Plan speaks to the basic need for neighborhood-serving nodes within the City, the Neighborhood Commercial designation-- of this site -ought to remain. Considering surrounding uses, this site probably has the greatest per capita potential to satisfy neighborhood convenience needs that any other site in the City. Environmental Review Staff feels the proposed mapping changes are inconsistent with General ,Plan policy and will therefore be recommending that the applications in question not be approved (at least as submitted) . Since projects which are not approved are statutorily exempt from the requirements of California' s Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) , no environmental document has been prepared. Should the Commission wish to approve this project, the matter would have to be rescheduled to allow for CEQA requirements to be met. CONCLUSIONS• Staff must assume that adoption of a revised General Plan Land Use Element in 1992 was indeed a conscious decision made for the advancement of the community' s social, economic and environmental goals. The proposed Land Use and zoning map amendments are essentially a request that this recently-adopted General Plan Update be- reconsidered, yet staff has found no new information or occurrences surfacing since 1992 that would seem to warrant such a reconsideration. Although redrawing maps sounds easy, maintaining General Plan consistency is often a difficult prerequisite. Under Atascadero' s General Plan, the framework for planning commercial development depends on the identification of specialized nodes which are ideal for accommodating neighborhood or tourist needs. Staff feels that changing the designation of such a uniquely ideal site to "basic strip retail" is inconsistent with expressed General Plan goals and jeopardizes the basic framework for planning in the City. 4 0000; 8 ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A - Location Map (General Plan) Attachment B - Location Map (Zoning) Attachment C - Developer's Statement Attachment D - Allowable Uses in CN Zone Attachment E - Allowable Uses in CR Zone Attachment F - Findings for Denial GPA94004:ZC94005\sr 5 0000,>9 1 ..IJ • J '- ATTACHMENT B CATION MAP (ZONING) �, A #94004; ZC #94005 9955 & 9965 EL CAMINO REAL CITY OF ATASCADERO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT I ' �' �,� � HSt- • Iry r \ 8 Q \\♦� 4 s 0444 S S I -FF f ;" -�; - CN 1 r O .•. . cr /p / 1 !AveIf JkcLeZll R S 'v y .' r 000061 REAL ESTATE / ATTACHMENT C DEVELOPERS i / / _VELOPER ' S STATEMENT GPA 494004; ZC 494005 9955 & 9965 EL CAMINO REAL Golden West Development CORP. September 30, 1994 Attn: Planning Dept. City of Atascadero `) ?00•' 8000 Palma Avenue Atascadero Ca. 93422 r^pp,.gJ Re: Hawkins Plaza 9965 E1 Camino AP#'s 030 466 012 through 019 Dear Planning Dept. : We are requesting that the City of Atascadero change the zoning and general plan on our properties back to the CR zoning that it was prior to the City initiated zone change. Our project was initiated, planned and approved under a CR zone use, then changed by the City to CN Zoning when they did a city wide general plan and zoning update. The CN category is very restricted in the uses allowed and has cost us several possible tenants who were interested in the center, but were not allowed uses under the CN zoning. A few examples of uses we feel are appropriate for the site but no longer allowed are: l) -Offices 2 ) Financial Services 3 ) Light Repair Services 4 ) Vocational Schools 5 ) Broadcast Studios 6 ) Mail Order and Vending 7 ) Social Organizations 8 ) Furniture Furnishings and Equipment We also feel that because our zoning was changed without written notice to us (after our project had been approved by the City) that the City should reimburse us for the City fees for this procedure. • 7627 MORRO ROAD - P. O. BOX 961 - ATASCADERO- CAL1FORRIA 93423 (805)461-1300 • FAX(805)461-0457 000OG �o We honestly feel that our project has been severely hampered in our guest to obtain tenants because of this City initiated zone change. Sincerely, Golden West Development Corp. , General Partner Hawkins •Plaza, Ltd. Richard K. Shannon i ALLOWABLE USES -- CN ZONE 1PA 094004; ZC 494005 ' ADOPTED JUNE 27, 1983 9955 & 9965 EL CAM. NO REAL CN (Commercial Neighborhood) Zone 9-3 . 201. Purpose: This zone is established to provide for small scale retail shopping and personal service facilities at the neighbor- hood level. .The Commercial Neighborhood Zone is situated and designed to serve the limited shopping and service needs of the immediately surrounding residential area. i . . 9-3 . 202. Allowable Uses: The following uses shall be allowed in the Commercial Neighborhood Zone. The establishment of allowable uses shall be as provided by Section 9-2.107 (Plot Plans) and Section i 9-2.108 (Precise Plans) : j (a) Food and beverage retail sales, where areas of use are less than 1000 square feet per store (b) Roadside stands (See Section 9-6.116) (c) Temporary or seasonal retail sales (See Section 9-6.174) (d) General merchandise stores, where areas of use are less than I 1000 square feet per store (e) Accessory storage (See Section 9-6.103) (f) Personal services where areas of use are less than 1000 square feet per store (g) Utility transmission facilities (h) Collection stations (See Section 9-6 .130) (i) Eating and drinking places, where areas of use are greater than 100.0 square feet per store ' (7) Bed and Breakfast (k) Schools (See Section 9-6.125) ' 9-3 .203. Conditional Uses: The following uses may be allowed in ' the Commercial Neighborhood Zone. The establishment of conditional uses shall be as provided by Section 9-2.109 (Conditional Use Permits) : (a) Caretaker's residence (See Section 9-6.104) (b) Churches and related activities (See Section 9-6 .121) ' (c) Pipelines 000-OG4 3- 23 ADOPTED JUNE 27, 1983 (d) Service Stations (See Section 9-6.164) (e) Food and beverage retail sales, where areas of use are greater than 1000 square feet per store (f) General merchandise stores, where areas of use are greater than 1000 square feet per store (g) Personal services, where areas of use are greater than 1000 square feet per store (h) Eating and drinking places, where areas of use are greater than 1000 square feet per store 9-3.204. Lot Size. There shall be no minimum lot size in the Commercial Neighborhood Zone. d nil 3-24 00 ;S HIIHLHMENI E _LOWABLE USES -- CR ZONE _PA 4-94004; ZC 494005 ADOPTED JUNE 27, 1983 9955 ' & 9965 EL CAMINO REAL CR (Commercial Retail) Zone 9-3 . 221. Purpose: This zone is established to provide for a wide range of commercial uses to accommodate most of the retail and service needs of the residents of the City and surrounding areas. 9-3. 222. Allowable Uses: -The following uses shall be allowed in the Commercial Retail Zone. The establishment of allowable uses shall be as provided by Section 9-2.107 (Plot Plans) and Section 9-2.108 (Precise Plans) : (a) Broadcast studios (b) Building materials and hardware (See Section 9-6.165) (c) Food and beverage retail sales (d) Furniture, home furnishings and equipment (e) General merchandise stores (f) Mail order and vending (g) Temporary or seasonal sales (See Section 9-6.174) (h) Financial services (i) Health care services (j) Offices (k) Small scale manufacturing (1) Temporary offices (See Section 9-6.176) (m) Personal services (n) Light repair services (o) Accessory storage (See Section 9-6.103) (p) Eating and drinking places (q) Membership organizations (r) Horticultural specialties (See Section 9-6 .116) (s) Auto, mobilehome, vehicle dealers and suppliers (See Section 9-6.163) (t) Vehicle and equipment storage (See Section 9-6 .183) M 3-27 00001"t; �. 'J ADOPTED JUNE 27, 1983 (u) Schools - business and vocational (See Section 9-6. 125) . (v) Utility transmission facilities (w) Business support services, where all areas of use are lo- cated within a building (x) Social and service organizations (y) Collection stations (See Section 9-6 .130) (z) Sales lots (See Section 9-6.139) (aa) Farm equipment and supplies (bb) Fuel and ice dealers (See Section 9-6.129) (cc) Hotels and motels (dd) Skilled Nursing Facility (See Section 9-6.134) (ee) Bed and Breakfast (ff) Retirement Hotel (gg) Funeral Services (hh) Schools (See Section 9-6.125) (ii) Utility service center (jj) Libraries and museums (kk) Temporary Events (See Section 9-6.177) 9-3. 223. Conditional Uses: The following uses may be allowed in the Commercial Retail Zone. The establishment of conditional uses shall be as provided by Section 9-2.109 (Conditional Use Permits) : (a) Amusement services (b) Caretaker residence (See Section 9-6.104) (c) Service Station (See Section 9-6.164) (d) Public assembly and entertainment (e) Indoor recreation services (f) Animal hospitals (See Section 9-6 .110) 'I 3-28 0000 :' i ADOPTED JUNE 27, 1983 (g) Auto Repair and Services (See Section 9-6.168) (h) Churches and related activities (See Section 9-6.121 ( i) Food and kindred products (See Section 9-6.128) (j) Pipelines (k) Outdoor recreation services (See Section 9-6.123) (1) Sports Assembly (m) Transit stations and terminals (n) Kennels (See Section 9-6.111) 9-3. 224. Lot Size: There shall be no minimum lot size in the Commercial Retail Zone. 3- 29 00001,8 ,tr ATTACHMENT F -- Findings for Denial GPA #94004; ZC #94005 9955 & 9965 E1 Camino Real (Hawkins Plaza Ltd./Golden West Development) Findings for Denial -- GPA #94004: 1. The proposed General Plan Amendment is inconsistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan. 2. The proposed General Plan Amendment may have significant effects on the environment. Adequate environmental documentation to assess potential City-wide (cumulative) impacts has not been prepared. Findings for Denial -- ZC #94005: 1. The proposal is not compatible with surrounding land use and zoning designations. 2. The proposal is not consistent with the General Plan Land Use Element. 3. The proposal may result in significant adverse environmental impacts; an adequate environmental document has not been prepared. 0000 ,9 �1 ATTACHMENT B .LEGATIVE DECLARATION CITY OF ATASCADERO ZC #94005 (HAWKINS PLAZA) COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF ATASCADERO ENVIRONNzNTAL COORDINATOR NEGATIVE DECLARATION COMWJN=DEVELOPMEW, DEPT. 6500 PALMA AVE. ATASCADERO.CA 93422 (805)461-5035 APPLICANT: ?Lx-ep, yo ?6Z� 6'tmaa IZcAI� PROJECT TITLE: RIONX CAASV=E o� PROJECT LOCATION: C.4 aor1E %Dfc PROJECT DESCRIPTION: kr'tv-40 'irxT Or- 'T�i6 �oNIN6, Oeo,wa�cE R•eLA,rnJE TD -*kE 71?ES 6-F t. � USES A.t,Low� ,4*4D o4R c a,�fl,T1 a u.� A-1,t si) 64 �1E Ct 4 FMINGS: 616ktBa�-1-Ecol, -�200-lE • 1. The project does not have the potential to degrade the environment. 2. The project will not achieve short-term to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals. 3. The project does not have impacts which are Individually limited.but comulattvely considerable. 4. The project will not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings either directly or indirectly. DETERAM11ATION: Based on tfie above findings.and the information contained In the initial study(made a parthereof by refer- ence and on file in the Community Development Department).it has been determined that the above Project will not have an adverse impact on the environment. Henry Engen Community Development Director Date Posted: Z• Z'•4 S Date Adopted: 0000,10 MINUTES EXCERPTS PLANNING COMMISSION - 2/21/95 Planning Commission Meeting, February 21, 1995 otion: Edwards Se nd: Wallace AYE Edwards, Wallace, Messer, Bonnema, Bowen, ller, Johnson NOES: None ABSENT: ne A motion was made o recommend to the City uncil that General Plan Amendment 1940 be approved based on a Findings contained in the Draft Resoluti (Attachment F) . Motion: ---Edwards Second: Wallace AYES: Edwards, Wallace, sser, Bonnema, Bowen, Miller, Johnson NOES: None ABSENT: None A motion was mad to recommend to the Cit Council that Zone Change #94004 b approved based on the Finding contained in the Draft Ordinan (Attachment G) . Motion: dwards Second- Wallace AYES* Edwards, Wallace, Messer, Bonnema, Bowen, ' ller, Johnson ES: None ABSENT: None 4. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT #94004/ZONE CHANGE #94005: Request. to "change the land use designation of certain real property from "Neighborhood Commercial" to "Retail Commercial. " A Zone Change is also being requested to change the zoning of the site accordingly (from CN to CR) . (Hawkins Plaza Ltd. ) (Golden West Development) Subject site is located at 9955 & 9965 El Camino Real. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: (Kaiser) The Planning Commission should recommend to the City Council that General Plan Amendment #94004 and Zone Change #94005 be denied based on the Findings contained in Attachment F. (Page 8 of 12) 00Q0'; , Planning Commission Meeting - February 21, 1995 TESTIMONY: Richard Shannon, 5200 San Benito Road, Atascadero, one of the owners of the Hawkins Plaza, referred to the staff report of 1991 which supported the former CR zoning of this property. He also indicated that, at the time the project was approved, there was no mention from anyone that the City was considering changing the property to CN zoning. The General Plan update came in 1992, but he received no legal notice of any type that this was being changed;. The developers of this project went out and secured loans and spent over one million dollars to develop this center under the CR zoning, which has about 51 allowed uses. The CN zoning has 11 allowed uses, but only 4 of those are really practical for this site. The developers have tried to live with this zone change over the last 1-1/2 years trying to rent out space under severely -restricted use constraints. They have done a tremendous amount of marketing, lowered prices and everything they can do to try and fill the center. He reiterated that this center was built as a retail center, not a neighborhood center. This change has placed an unfair burden on the owners of this property and they are asking for the City to help resolve the problem in whatever way works. Mr. Shannon pointed out that E1 Bordo (which borders this property) has just been upgraded to collector status, several of the votes tonight have returned property to previous zoning. He asked that this property follow this trend in trying to fix wrongs done previously. He also expressed that there are a lot of inconsistencies in the General Plan and his zoning request should not be denied because of a couple sentences that were previously put in the Plan without taking into consideration what the City had just granted these owners. These sentences were added in error and not by conscious intent. The developers also asked that they be refunded the $1,900 that it cost to bring this issue before the Planning Commission and the City Council. They feel they have suffered enough. The developer asked that if the CN zone uses are to be changed, that the list he previously submitted be considered. ACTION: None. The request for consideration of General Plan Amendment and Zone Change was continued by consensus and staff was directed to expedite the modification of the CN zone text to expand the allowed uses for the Commission's consideration. 11124 AMERUM )b: A o of an Economic Development Element as pa a City's General Plan. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: amp) recommends the following Commission action (Page 9 of 12) 000072 MINUTES EXCERPTS PLANNING COMMISSION - 3/21/0, Planning Commission Action Minutes, March 21, 1995 SUBJECT: B. HEARINGS, APPEARANCES, AND REPORTS (continued) 2 . ZONE CHANGE #94005: Application filed by Hawkins Plaza (Golden West Development) proposing an amendment to the text of the Zoning Ordinance relative to uses allowed in the CN (Commercial Neighborhood) zone. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: (Kaiser) The Planning Commission should recommend that the City Council: 1. Find that the subject Zoning Ordinance text change would not have a significant effect on the environment and that the Negative Declaration prepared for the project is adequate under California's Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requirements; and 2 . Approve Zone Change 194005 based on the Findings and terms contained in the Draft Ordinance (Attachment C) . TESTIMONY: Richard Shannon, 5070 San Benito Road, concurred with staff's report and thanked staff for expediting getting this item back before the Commission. Jodi Haynes, 5705 Del Rio Road, spoke on behalf of herself and John Taylor. She requested that Farm Equipment and Supplies be added as a Conditional Use in the Commercial Neighborhood Zone. (SEE ATTACHED LETTER) ACTION: Approve staff recommendation #1. Motion: Miller Second: Messer AYES: Miller, Messer, Edwards, Bonnema, Bowen, Johnson NOES: None ABSENT: Wallace (excused) (Page 4 of 6) 00007 Planning Commission Action Minutes, March 21, 1995 • ACTION: Approve staff recommendation #2 . Motion: Miller Second: Messer AYES: Miller, Messer, Edwards, Bonnema, Bowen, Johnson NOES: None ABSENT: Wallace (excused) (Page 5 of 6) 0000"d ORDINANCE NO. 287 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT REGARDING ALLOWED AND CONDITIONALLY ALLOWED USES IN THE COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD (CN) ZONING DISTRICT (ZC 94-005; HAWKINS PLAZA) WHEREAS, the proposed zoning text amendments are consistent with the General Plan as required by Section 65860 of the California Government Code; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendments are in conformance with Section 65800 et seq. of the California Government Code concerning zoning regulations; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendments will not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . The Negative Declaration prepared for the project is adequate; and WHEREAS, the Atascadero Planning Commission held a public hearing on February 21, 1995 and on March 21, 1995, and has recommended approval of Zone Change 94-005 . NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Atascadero does ordain as follows : Section 1 . Council Findings . 1 . The proposal is compatible with the surrounding land use and zoning. 2 . The proposals is consistent with the General Plan land use element . 3 . The proposal will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts . The Negative Declaration prepared for the project is adequate . Section 2 . Zoning Text . The Zoning Ordinance text is hereby amended by the addition of the language shown on the attached Exhibit A. Section 3 . Publication. The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published once within fifteen (15) days after its passage in the Atascadero News, a newspaper of general circulation, printed, published, and circulated in the City in accordance with Section 36933 of the Government Code; shall certify the adopting and posting of this 00(%'N"C' J10 Ordinance # 287 Page 2 ordinance and shall cause this ordinance and this certification together with proof of posting to be entered into the Book of Ordinances of the City. Section 4 . Effective Date. This ordinance shall go into effect and be in full force and effect at 12 : 01 a.m. on the 31st day after its passage . On motion by and seconded by , the foregoing Ordinance is approved by the following role call vote: AYES : NOES : ABSENT: DATE ADOPTED: CITY OF ATASCADERO By: R. DAVID BEWLEY, 'Mayor ATTEST: LEE PRICE, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ARTHER R. MONTANDON, City Attorney PREPARED BY: HENRY ENGEN, Community Development Director 000076- EXHIBIT A CN (Commercial Neighborhood) Zone S 9-3 .201 . Purpose: This zone is established to provide for small scale retail shopping and personal service facilities at the neighborhood level . The Commercial Neighborhood Zone is situated and designed to serve the limited shopping and service needs of the immediately surrounding residential area. 9-3 .202 . Allowable Uses: The following uses shall be allowed in the Commercial Neighborhood Zone. The establishment of allowable uses shall be as provided By Section 9-2 . 107 (Plot Plans) and Section 9-2 . 108 (Precise Plans) : (a) Food and beverage retail sales, where areas of use are less than 1000 2500 square feet per store (b) Roadside stands (See Section 9-6 . 116) (c) Temporary or seasonal retail sales (See Section 9-6 . 174) (d) General merchandise stores, where areas of use are less than 1000 2500 square feet per store n L (f-e) Personal services, where areas of use are less than 1000 2500 square feet per store (hf) Collection stations (See Section 9-6 . 130) (gig) Eating and drinking places, where areas of use are less than 1000 2500 square feet per store (j) Bed and Breakfast (h) Financial Services, where the aggregate area of the uses, in combination with other "Office" uses does not exceed 30% of the available floor area of the project or neighborhood center. (i) Offices, where the aggregate area of the uses, in combination with other "Financial services" does not exceed 30% of the available floor area of the project or neighborhood center. (J) Light Repair Services 0000"0'7 9-3 .203 . Conditional Uses : The following uses may be allowed in the Commercial Neighborhood Zone. The establishment of conditional uses shall be as provided by Section 9-2 . 109 (Conditional Use Permits) : (a) C--meta fie_' s residenee--(-eves Seeti6ii-9 6 . 104) ehe3 and related aetiyiires -(See Sa...r 9. 6 . 121 (e) Pipelines (da) Service Stations (See Section 9-6 . 164) (eb) Food and beverage retail sales, where areas of use are greater than 1000 2500 square feet per store (-fc) General merchandise stores, where areas of use are greater than 1000 2500 square feet per store (hd) Eating and drinking places, where areas of use are greater than 1000 2500 square feet per store 9-3 .204 . Lot Size . There shall be no minimum lot size in the Commercial Neighborhood Zone. i i 00010"A REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item: C-1 Through: Andrew J. Takata, City Manager Meeting Date: 4/25/95 From: Henry Engen, Community Development Director W, SUBJECT: Consideration of alternatives to the SLOCOG Supervote procedures RECOMMENDATION: Eliminate supervote as it currently exists and, after discussion, provide direction to the City's SLOCOG delegate for support on alternatives. BACKGROUND: At the City Council's March 28th meeting, Council directed the delegate to the Integrated Waste Management Authority (IWMA) to requestthat bodyto eliminate the so-called supervote provisions of the IWMA's Joint Powers Agreement (JPA). Subsequently, we received the enclosed communication from Ron DeCarli, Executive Director of the San Luis Obispo Council of Governments, asking for feedback to SLOCOG on six different options to the present supervote procedure. Since the JPA requires modification by all members, it may be prudent to provide the delegate with preferred alternatives to simply eliminating the supervote. The supervote requires eight affirmative votes from the twelve members, regardless of the number of persons in attendance at a particular meeting. ANALYSIS: The attached communication provides for the following options: Option 1: Retain existing policy— Council direction is clear on rejecting the status quo. Option 2: Modify supervote to 2/3 ("two-thirds policy"). This would provide a sliding scale of 6-8 votes being required for a supervote. Option 3: Modify supervote to "majority of membership". This would establish a minimum vote of 7 —a numerical majority of SLOCOG — when called for. As proposed, it would also require at least one of those votes to be from the county. There is some precedent for this approach in the Government Code which re- 0 0 0 kIT7- e-000kIT7- quires not less than a majority of the total members of a legislative body to adopt or amend a general plan. Option 4: Modify supervote to "majority of attendees". This would allow as few as 4 votes out of 7 members in attendance to conduct busi- ness. Option 5. Deadlock alternate. This would require a 2/3 vote of attending members where a supervote is deadlocked. Option 6. Other, as may be generated through City Council discussion. HE/AT:cw Enclosure: 4/11/95 communication from SLOCOG. 2 0000)40 San Luis Obispo Council of Governments Arroyo Grande` �•�` Regional Transportation Planning.Agency —Ata sdero Groeach Metropolitan Planning Organization Morro Bay p gr g Paso Robles Pismo Beach Congestion Management AgenCY San LuisSi 6 Obispo Oounty RECEIVED . April 11, 1995 .._. _i APR 3 -6?1', . I ; ATASCADERO CITI:MANAGER Dear City Manager; At the April 5th meeting of SLOCOG, the group discussed one provision of the Joint Powers- Agreement,that defines a Supervote. ;This provision has been.somewhat controversial as the attached staff report shows; and staff were directed to request each city council-to-agendize the issue for input and recommendations: The staff report adequately describes the issue. Two options, however, were,added to the'list of possible SLOCOG actions during discussions. These. optlons�are: Option #5- Deadlock alternate. In the,event that;an issue"is deadlocked,because of�a failed supervote on each side of the issue, an alternate 2f3 vote of"attending members maybe-called by any rnember, . Option #6 Other.. [To be developed by City Council discussion] Any changes to the Joint-Powers Agreement must be ratified by.each;cityand the County. A change of the Supervote provision,therefore,,must.be capable of garnering widespread support or no change will take place. Please let your Council'know we appreciate Their comments and concerns and will carry'them forward'to SLOCOG at the next opportunity. Contact me at 781-4251 if you have any questions on this issue. Sincerely, Ronald L. De Carli Executive Director' asue\supervot.dan 000081 1150 Osos St. Suite 202, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 ♦ Tel. (805) 781-4219 ♦ Fax. (805) 781-5703 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS MEETING DATE. ApnlS, 1995 SUBJECT Review of fhe "Supervote" Provision in the COG Joitt.Ptwers Agreement;(JPA)` SUMMARY Events at recent SLOCOG meetings have focused much attention on the "supervote"provisions of the Joint Powers Agreement (JPA). This has lead to a request from Delegate Carden for an agenda item to review the supervote issue. This item was agendized and discussed in January 1994, the minutes regarding the item are attached (see C-1-4). The "supervote"is the requirement for 8 affirmative votes to take an action that may be requested by any member Agency. This provision is contained in Section V, 5. of the JPA as follows: V. OPERATIONS 5. "Forthe purposes of conducting business,there shall be a quorum consisting of a majority of representatives, including (1) COUNTY representative. No action shall be effective without the affirmative votes of a majority of those present. However, eight (8) affirmative votes shall be required for taking any action in the event that any agency demands such a vote. The representatives to SLOCOG shall adopt such procedures as are consistent with this Agreement and necessary to conduct the business of SLOCOG in an orderly manner." Two issues have been proposed for consideration: 1. Should the supervote be maintained as a part of the Joint Powers Agreement? 2. What shall be considered an "agency" - as applied to this provision - regarding the 5 members of the Board of Supervisors who each sit on the SLOCOG Governing Board as a Representative ? Any change to the language of the JPA would require approval of all member agencies. The adopted SLOCOG Rules of Procedure do not specifically address this issue. RECOMMENDATION Staff: Review and provide direction. CTAC: Did not review. TTAC: Did not review. supervt.apr C_1—1 00008,1 DISCUSSION The "supervote" concept has been in existence since 1978 in the SLOCOG JPA. The original intention in adopting this provision was to provide a means to address potential City/County conflicts that may arise, and serve to "even the playing field" between the Cities and the County (there were 6 cities and 5 Supervisors seated as voting members at the time this provision was originally adopted). Each County Supervisor has a vote as a SLOCOG Representative. As identified during prior evaluations, if Supervisors were to vote as.a "block" an additional three City representative votes would be needed to achieve the 8 votes required. And conversely, the Cities would need one vote from the County Supervisors to achieve the required 6 votes if incorporated interests were to vote as a "block". Recent use of the supervote has not been centered upon city vs County issues, but rather philosophical or political differences. Several actions have recieved majority approval and not resulted in action based upon application of the supervote provision. At times supervote requirements have been applied on both "yes" and "no" sides of an issue resulting in no action. On March 21 st the Board of Supervisors considered the issue of whether a majority of the Board- or any individual Board member-could request a supervote on the County's behalf at the March 22nd Special Meeting. The Supervisors elected to allow any member of their Board the historically practiced option as Representatives to SLOCOG-to request a supervote which would commit the County as an Agency as defined within the JPA. Supervisors noted the evaluation and extensive debate of voting structures - conducted in January 1994 and during the formation of the Integrated Waste Mangement Authority (IWMA) - did not find other means that were considered to be as fairly representative as the current practice of having each Supervisor represent his/her District as a Representative exercising all rights and responsibilities therof. Supervisors also identified their numerous roles as Representatives of the five Supervisorial Districts including: • both incorporated and unincorporated populations are within each district; • unincorporated area population is approximately 40% of total population, and; • districts include large rural and unincorporated urban areas of diverse interest and need. At the January 5, 1994 SLOCOG meeting the Delegates considered the following options regarding the supervote. No action was taken at that time. The minutes regarding this issue are attached on page C-1-4. Option 1: Retain existing policy If the perception is that the existing "supervote" vote policy is effective for conducting business, no modifications are necessary. Pros - No City/County reconsideration required. No resulting impact to staff time or overloaded City Council agendas. Existing safeguards continue. Assures higher level of consensus for passage of controversial projects. Cons - A minority of members could continue to block the intentions of the majority. superv(.apr C-1-2 Option 2: Modify "supervote" to a two-thirds (2/3rds) policy This modification is consistent with the existing policy but establishes a sliding scale based on attendance. The necessary affirmative vote would be: 8 of 12, 8 of 11, 7 of 10, 6 of 9, 6 of 8, and 6 of 7. (No quorum below 7) Pros - Requires a substantial majority consensus accounting for the lack of attendance. Cons - Six (6) affirmative votes could approve an issue although it is not a majority of SLOCOG membership. Option 3: Modify "supervote" to majority of membership This option drops the "supervote" requirement to seven (7) affirmative votes and adds the provision that at least one of the seven (7),Wrmative votes is from the County. Pros - Weakens the effect of the existing "supervote" provision. Maintains the majority provision, while allowing adequate protection to City and County interests, and mitigating gridlock resulting from reduced attendance. Cons - Does not provide the same level of assurance for the Cities or the County to hinder City vs. County provincial issues. Option 4: Modify "supervote" to majority of attendees This option basically cancels the"supervote"concept. A majority of attendees,with as few as four (4) affirmative votes out of seven (7) attendees could conduct business. Pros - Attendance at SLOCOG meetings would likely rise. Cons- No provisions or safeguards for the County or Cities to block provincial issues affecting their jurisdiction. WORM supervt.apr C-1-3 REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item: C-2 Through: Andrew J. Takata, City Manager Meeting Date: 4/25/95 From: Henry Engen, Community Development Director WC SUBJECT: "Rule 901" Trip Reduction Rule Options. Consideration of request from San Luis Obispo Council of Governments for support their reconsider- ation of Rule 901 by the Air Pollution Control District Board. RECOMMENDATION: That the APCD reconsider their rejection of Rule 901 . BACKGROUND: On March 29, 1995, the County Air Pollution Control District (APCD) rejected trip reduction Rule 901 on a 6:2 vote and directed staff to develop a voluntary program for employers that have over 100 employees. At the San Luis Obispo Council of Governments (SLOCOG) April 5, 1995 meeting, additional data on the impacts of abandoning Rule 901 was considered (see attached), and on a 7:3 vote SLOCOG requested that the APCD reconsider their action. APCD will consider whether to reconsider the issue at a future date at their April 26th meeting. ANALYSIS: The state-mandated, locally-adopted Congestion Management Plan provided two alter- natives for developing a transportation demand management ordinance: 1) Rule 901 which would have the APCD rule adopted for the entire region, or 2) develop a local ordinance which would require that the City of Atascadero establish a ride-share center, staffed by an employee transportation coordinator, leading to development of a program for reducing jurisdictional staff trips and developing a facility-oriented review process that reduces trips. Absent compliance with the Congestion Manage- ment Plan, the City of Atascadero has some $314,645 at risk. CONCLUSION: Notwithstanding the social engineering arguments against this process, staff time would be better devoted to other tasks. HE/AT:cw Enclosures: April 5, 1995 SLOCOG staff report 00E20 'T Dear {City Administrator} DRAF The San Luis Obispo Air Pollution Control District (APCD) met on March 29th, with one of the action items being the review and possible approval of an employer-based Trip Reduction Ordinance (TRO). The rule was rejected by a 6 to 2 vote. This has implications for your jurisdiction, as now each city and the county must.approve a jurisdictional (not employer-based) trip reduction and travel demand ordinance to comply with state congestion management law. To comply with State law our Congestion Management Plan (CMP) included two options: Ratify a Trip Reduction Ordinanco (TRO) adopted by the APCD; or Each City and the County adopt their own Trip Reduction Ordinance (TRO). Since the APCD rejected the TRO recommended by their staff all Cities and the County must adopt their own ordinances to continue to receive certain State and Federal transportation funds. Attached you will find a copy of the pertinent pages of the San Luis Obispo Congestion Management Plan, adopted in May of 1994. You will note tho throe requirements of a local ordinance which are: 1. Development of a Rideshare Center/Employee Transportation Coordinator 2. Development of a program for reducing jurisdictional staff trips. 3. Development of a facility-oriented review process that reduces trips. You will be required to prepare the ordinance establishing these components and implementing them. The Council of Government's staff will work closely with your office to develop a model ordinance, and we will enlist the Regional Rideshare office for its assistance during the implementation. The time schedule has been compressed d;amaticaily. State law requires all Cities and the County to be in conformity with the Congestion Management Plan (CMP) by December 31, 1995. Awaiting APCD's action has meant we must accelerate the ordinance preparation; there are financial implications if each City and the County does not have an ordinance in place by November, when the annual CMP compliance review is scheduled. Streets and roads projects funded by state subvention funding and by Surface Transportation Program (STP) cannot bo distributed to any jurisdiction found by SLOCOG to be out of compliance. Your jurisdiction has $ at risk annually from these funding resources. The attached spreadsheet shows this anancial impact and the impact on the region as a whole. Please contact me directly at 781-4251 if you have questions on this matter. Sincerely, Ronald L. DeGarll Executive Director �tra.dan f°lar 3tj, 1'��� W4-�::>H'I r-KUI'I SLUk_UU i u oleo�u DRAFT a SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNCIL OR GOVERNMENTS STAFF REPORT ,MEETING DATE: APRIL 5, 1995 SUBJECT:_ CLEAN AIR PLAN COMMUTE ALTERNATIVES*,RULE ADDENDUM REPORT SUMMARY On March 29th, the County Air Pollution Control District (APCD) Board considered and rejocted the Trip Reduction Rule (TRO) commonly known as Rule 901 on a 6/2 vote. The Board referred the proposed rule back to staff to develop a"voluntary program"for all applicable employers that have over 100 employees and institute a "mandatory rule" only if the trip reduction goals are not met within a three year period. The APCD will discuss the fiscal implications of this action at a future meeting. No datoz have been set for either action. This action shifts the trip reduction efforts from the APCD to local jurisdictions. Each city and the County must now adopt their own trip reduction and travel demand ordinance by December 31, 1995 to continue to receive up to$4.5 million annually in State and Federal transportation funds, as required by State law (Gov Code, sec 65089.3). !RECOMMENDATION Staff: a. Provide a recommendation to APCD to endorse the Rule in its present or modified form; or b, direct staff to work with each jurisdiction to develop their own ordinance for individual adoption. CTAC: Originally supported APCD rule as the option to comply with CMP requirements. TTAC: Strongly supported APCD rule. as the option to comply with CMP requirement. DISCUSSION State law mandates all urban areas adopt a very prescriptive congestion management plan (CMP). All such plans must include a trip reduction and travel demand element. The SL.O regional CMP, adopted in May, 1994 includes this element in Chapter 6. State law also mandates that the Congestion Management Agency (SLOCOG) annually assure each city and the county are in compliance with the GMP. Of utmost importance the Act(Gov',Code Sec, 65089.3) requires SLOCOG to assure each city and the county has adopted and is Implementing a trip reduction and travel demand ordinance. Failure to comply with this requirement is the loss of State and Federal funds as noted in attachment A. Mar -0, 1995 04.56PM FROM SLOC:OG TO 94610506 P.04 To comply with this requirement the SLOCOG CMP provided two options as described in attachment B. Each city and the county would have to either: ratify the APCO Rule (Option A): or adopt their own trip reduction ordinance with certain minimum requirements (Option B). Since the APCD did not adopt Rule 901 option B must be pursued by each jurisdiction to continue to maintain eligibility for certain state and federal transportation funds (attachment A, $4.5 m). Staff is requesting direction. Time is of the utmost as this requirement must be adoptod by December 31, 1995. Two options are provided for your consideration: Option 1: recommend that the APCD reconsider the Rule in light of this additional information. Although staff did provide testimony to the Board, no specific information was distributed as to the specific GMP roquircments, and the direct fiscal and local governmental implicatlons. The APCD board did concur with their Director's suggestion to have staff coordinate with affected governmental agencies and bring back the fiscal implications of this action. This appears to provide an opportunity for reconsideration of the action. Option 2: recommend that the APCD quickly bring back and adopt a 'voluntary rule' that would have specific thresholds of compliance or mandatory provisions would automatically apply. The APCD board specifically required their staff to develop a"voluntary program"to moot goals within a three year or they would institute a mandatory rule. A strictly voluntary program would not meet the State CMP requirements for "adoption of an ordinance". However, a Rule could be adopted in which a voluntary program must meet certain specified goals or a mandatory provision would apply. Such thresholds or goals could include: a. A baseline survey of all applicable employers to ascertain commuting behavior relative to the targets included in the initial rule. A certain percentage of employers (ex 50%) must comply with the survey or the Rule would become mandatory. Staff would assist all employers in meeting all applicable goals. b. A survey of all applicable employers after the first year to ascertain progress towards meeting specified targats. Again a certain percentage of accoptable surveys must be returned with some specified progress towards meeting specified goals. The failure to satisfy such thresholds would trip a mandatory action. C. Similar surveys in following years with the prospective of mandatory action without a specified level of participation or progress. Option 3: direct staff to send out the attached tetter to all jurisdictions advising them that they must adopt trip reduction and travel demand ordinances;and authorize staff to develop a model ordinance in cooperation with all affected jurisdictions for their consideration. This option would initiate action to implement Option B in the adopted CMP. Attachments: A. Annual Local funding subject to compliance with the GMP. B. Excerpts from the CMP relative to the Trip Reduction Requirements and local Optlons (A & ). Staff Report prepared by Ronald De Carli. rd\901 options 0000 j'vC7 Mar 30, 1995 04:57PM FROM SLOCOG TO 94610606 P.05 FUNDINGS WHICH COULD BE WITHELD DUE TO FINDING OF NON-CONFORMANCE WITH CMP REQUIREMENTS: FY 95/98 STATE ALLOCATED COG ANNUAL TARGET GAS TAX SUBV. SURFACE TRANS. JURISDICTION SEC. 2105 (EST) PRGM (STP) (EST) TOTAL ARROYO? GRANDE $115,989 $78,654 $184,643 ATASCADERO $185,938 $128,707 $314,645 GROVER BEACH $94,494 $64,353 $158,847 MORRO BAY $76,927 $50,652 $126,979 PASO ROBLES $160,337 $107,256 $267,593 PISMO BEACH $61,027 $42,902 $103,929 SLO CITY $334,844 $228,813 $563,657 SLO COUNTY $2,063,983 $478,060 $2,542,043 SUBTUrAL So 1,173,7 9—7 $4,277",339— REGIONAL ,REGIONAL N!A $581,251 $581,251 GRAND TOTAL $3,093,539 $1,760,048 $4,863,587 s Mar 7,0, 1995 04:51 PM FROM SLOCOG TO 94613606 P.66 1 ATTACIIMENT B i C Ca 13 . m c cn o s � � .4.aW.br • it a. • �ti o Nt ^� .... .....,......... o Q. r p Q ;QC a a No w C. win `o O a CY. o CL E0 - N co Y v � d O C E 4� A.� ° a d tC rG cr 3 d O a1 ao Ua 1993 CMP Tr/p Reductlon and Travel Demand Management Page&10 000(11::o Pla.r _AJ, i'_yy_ W4 9 1-KUl'l jLUWL, l U 74r.)iUO O r.J f ATTACH MEN T C� CONGESTION M 14N t.GE M J_T RUA*'" Mbined wfffiln tHese 1W5 Bro-a-d categotWof programs, Mark-et--b-aged programs have prov suc ssful in modifying travel behavior. Mark©t•based programs focus on bringing the so etal cost o individuals activities back to the individual through user fees. Revenue genet ed this way can b llized to develop and operate alternatives which reducs congestion and pollution. For example en a price is charged for parking, alternatives to the Single Oc ancy Vehicle (SOV) predictab ecome more economically attractive. The revenue gai can be used to subsidize transit pa s. One of the more effective p Ing programs is known as the'parki cash-out program". Recent changes In California law requir ngestion Management Plan address such programs. The parking cash-out program is an a loyer•funded progra nder which an employer offers to provide a cash allowance to an empl a equivalent t e parking subsidy that the employer would otherwise pay to provide the amp a with a rking space. A parking cash-out program may include a requirement that employee pa i is certify that they will comply with guidelines established by the employer designed to o neighborhood parking problems, with the provision that employees not complyin tth the 'delines will no longer be eligible for the parking cash-out program. Transportation planners and el ea officials generally agree th arging for parking atworksites to subsidize transit passe nd other alternative transportation des would improve traffic congestion and air qui However, it is generally believed that the present time such measures are too d tic given the current level of traffic congestion, air a!lty, and economic conditions. Nov eless, a parking pricing program for public agencies and Ivate businesses with over 100 ployees that report to work during peak hours may be approp a in San Luls Obispo C my at some time In the near future. This Issue should be reconsldere the 1995 Plan u ate. A review of local Transportation Control Measures and trip-reducing p rams ap ars at the end of this element, together with a synopsis of the current progress ea as ads in air aua& and trip rjdu!g1gn PROPOSED TRIP REDUCTION & TRAVEL DEMAND ORDINANCE The Air Pollution Control District is currently developing a Trip Reduction Ordinance called Rule 901. The rule contains requirements for employers with more then 100 employees to plan for employee commuter trip reduction. The establishment of Employee Transportation Coordinators, who conduct employee baseline surveys and prepare plans for reducing trips are all part of this Rule. The rule would be enacted by the Air Pollution Control District, encompassing the same geographic area as the Plan. The initial approach to the Ordinance component of the Plan was to incorporate fully the APCD rule for Trip Reduction. This continues to De the main thrust of the Plan element. However, the Rule has been two years in refinement, and implementation has recently been postponed again. It is unclear whether an ordinance will eventually be adopted. To handle this, two optional approaches are presented in this plan. OPTION A - Ratify Rule 901 by 12/94. If the Air Pollution Control District proposal for Rule 901 Is adopted prior to December 1, 1994, local jurisdictions may adopt the Rule and it will serve as the Transportation Demand Management Ordinance for the Plan. No further rule is required, but jurisdictions`can, at their option, adopt any of the alternative programs described in Option 8 to provide a local model for programs that reduce congestion and improve air quality. Enactment of this option will only require each jurisdiction to formally adopt the Ordinance as delineated in Rule 901. 1893 CMP Trip Reduction and Travel Demand Management Page 6.2 1 ✓fit 000 1 i.�ll �J• 1 ..r _� � 1 .VrLVw..v . v _���rr ry . �� OPTION B-Adorn a local Transportation Demand Management Ordinance by 3/31/9s which'r meets the following minimum requirements: 1. Rideshare.Center or Coordinator 2. Pronram-Oriented X801 • 3. planning Strategies if no rule is adopted by the Air Pollution Control District by December 1, 1994, or if a local jurisdiction does not desire to adopt an ordinance ratifying Rule 901, then they must adopt by ordinance a trip reduction/travel demand program as described below. Each jurisdiction may create and adopt its own Trip Reduction Program (TRP) but it must include certain minimum requirements described In this section. A minimum of three trip reduction strategies are required for the Ordinance in each jurisdiction. Since each jurisdiction is unique in character, each local govemmsnt will be authorized to craft the specifics of its own Ordinance. The three minimum requirements include: designation of an Employer-based Transportation Coordinator (Coordinator) ditt ationsto planning function;development of program-oriented trip reduction strategies;and mo strategies and ordinances to effectuate facility-oriented improvements. Congestion Management Agency staff will assist each jurisdiction in the development of their programs, The Ordinance's shall be adopted by each jurisdiction by March 31, 1995. The minimum requirements are described below. Minimum Requirements under Option B a. establish an Employer Transportation Coordinator-This requirement includes the (ETC) function and/or Rideshare Information Area. Each jurisdiction is required to designate a ridesharing coordinator for their Jurisdiction or establish a dedicated area for rideshare, transit and similar Information. An existing or new, full or part-time employee will act as the contact person for the trip reduction strategies implemented by the Jurisdiction. With the help of the Regional Rideshare Program, the Coordinator will distribute information describing transit, ridesharing and non-motorized commute alternatives, at a minimum, to employees of the jurisdiction and the Regional Ridesharing Program. This component of each Jurisdiction's program Is recommended,although jurisdictions may instead choose to establish a Rideshare Information Area. The Rideshare Information Area should be a display area that acts as a self-help "shopping center for Information on how employees can reduce the number of single-occupant vehicle commute trips. To remain effective, the information will need regular updating and replenishment of schedules/brochures, which will be done by the jurisdiction. Either the Coordinator or the Rideshare Information Area are required of jurisdictions, with both approaches being recommended. b. Program-Oriented Strategy- Under this option, each jurisdiction is required to develop a program based on the trip reduction strategies noted below. This approach focuses on the public agency as an employer. The program need only apply to the employees of the Particular jurisdiction at this time. 1• Establish a guaranteed/amergency ride home policy/program. (suggested) 2. Establish carpool or vanpooi programs. 7993 CMP Trip Reduction and Travel Demand Management Page 63 000092 I I•,.1 �L! 1JiJ Jr'VtJI I 1 1 I...I -JLVI.VU 1 V ..I'YU l•JIJ✓JI.J f.lJ= �.k 3. Establish an incentive program. For instance,offer a financial payment or paid/unpas time off, for employees who commute via alternative modes of transportation at lea three days/week. 4 4. Establish a parking pricing program. For instance, charge parking fees for sing occupancy vehicles, with the revenues used for;subsidizing transit passes, a weak lottery, or other incentives to modify transportation behavior. 5, Establish a preferential parking program for ridesharing employees. 6. Establish alternative work schedules. Allow compressed work-weeks such as 4/1 3/36 or 9/80 schedules where employees report to work fewer days per week bt work longer hours. 7. Establish a telecommuting program. 8. Join a Transportation Management Association(TMA). .9. Participate.In the APCO's Commute Alternative Program. 10. Establish other trip reduction programs. C. Planning Strategies(Facility-oriented modifications)-Under this option, each jurisdictic is required to integrate travel demand management measures in their land use planning ar development process. Local jurisdictions shall modify general plans, specific plans, arr plans and corresponding implementing ordinances including; zoning, parking, subdivisic and planned unit development ordinances.A variety of strategies are available to proms alternative transportation through the plan review process. Options include, but are nc limited to 1, Modify parking requirements for new developments and either create a transportatic fund or allow a reduction of parking requirements for equal to trip reduction. F• example,reduce required parking by 20%and dovelop a transportation fund with 80 of the conserved expenditure. The remaining 20%serves as a cost savings inceno for private developers to participate In the program (suggested) 2. Establish a local ordinance for facility improvements to encourage bicycling,walkir. transit (such as showers, lockers, bicycle racks, transit shelters etc.). 3. Establish local ordinance for developing Park and Ride lots. j4. Establish land use policies that encourage mixed-use developments, comps communities, and a balance of jobs and housing. S. Other facility-oriented strategies. 1993 CMP Trip Reduction and Travel Demand Management 000093 page E 1'Id(' J1J! l�v� JJ•uClf-'I'I r'(CVI'1 Jl.ul.ul_7 lu Zi0QIUOVJG Y". lVJ COORDINATION EFFORTS AND RELATIONSHIP TO APCD RULEMAKING Air quality and transportation planners have simliar legislative mandates to establish programs that reduce traffic congestion and improve air quality. Programs affecting the transportation system, whether initiated by air districts, local governments or transportation agencies, should be equitable and consistent, but not duplicative. The measures suggested for consideration are consistent with trip reduction options recommended by the Air District. Meeting both the requirements of upcoming Air District rules and the guidelines of the Plan will not require a doubling of effort by the jurisdictions. The two programs have common elements. The draft Commute Alternatives Rule (Rule 901) proposed by the APCD requires designation of a Coordinator and establishment of an emergency -ride home policy. Beyond these areas of consistency, the Plan requires under Option 8 that a facility-oriented program be established. With this approach, Congestion Management Agency and Air Pollution Control District staff have worked to ensure that tho Trip Reduction Ordinance of the Plan is consistent and complementary with the rules proposed by the APCD. Recent legislation (AB 2107) requires that Air.District rules and trip reduction ordinances of the Congestion Management Program not be duplicative. Consequently, if a jurisdiction is captured by the current version of the Commute Aiternatives rule they will not be subject to the Coordinator and program-oriented trip reduction strategies as outlined In the Plan. Those jurisdictions with greater than 100 employees would fall under the_puMow of the Air District to meet those requirements. Nevertheless; modifications to planning strategies would still apply under the Plan to those jurisdictions. EFFECTIVENESS OF THE PROPOSED PROGRAM The program can be as effective as the jurisdiction is aggressive. The programs selected by each Jurisdiction should have the greatest return on the level of effort required for their implementation. 'The designation of a Coordinator is an essential first step. The success of many programs has been attributed to enthusiastic trip reduction coordinators. Jurisdictions in favor of aggressive programs are encouraged to extend trip reduction programs to private businesses in their jurisdictions and to combine a variety of Transportation Demand Management strategies. Local jurisdictions have the development process to review and require trip reduction programs at the local level. Local selection, enforcement and implementation of the facility'-oriented ordinance shouid promote a sense of local commitment and aid in the program's effectiveness. A survey of 1100 employees of San Luis Obispo County In November 1991 clearly showed that establishing a Guaranteed Ride Home program could be one of the most effective programs to address concerns people have with using public transit, carpooling and vanpools. While the Guaranteed Ride Home program is a"service"that would be provided for ridesharers,the leading "incentive"to create a modal shift, according to the survey, is to offer more vacation time,or time- off for those who do not commute alone by automobile. One interpretation of the survey suggests that the most valuable commodity to employees is time. Paid or unpaid, each jurisdiction may experiment to see what motivates their employees to rideshare more often. TIME FRAME FOR LOCAL AGENCY ADOPTION Option A - Jurisdictions are required to ratify Rule 901 within three months following adoption by the APCO. Trip reduction programs should be operational by the time specified in the language of the Rule. 1993 CMP Trip Reduction and Travel Demand Management 0 0 0()`_i 4 Page Ba Option 8-Jurisdictions are required to adopt trip reduction ordinances by March 31, 1 Trip reduction programs should be operatJonal by July 1, 1995. ENFORCEMENT Option A - Monitoring and enforcing Rule 901 will be the responsibility of APCD. Option B - Monitoring and enforcing the trip reduction efforts is the responsibility o. respective jurisdictions. The trip reduction ordinances should Include a speck quan- goal against which results can be measured. Each jurisdiction will annually provide a wr progress/status report to SLOCOG. This will be required by SLOCOG as a part of ar, compliance review as documented in the Monitoring and Compliance element. I DESCRIPTION OF CURRENT PROGRAMS AND EFFORTS San Luis Obispo Clean Air Plan - The Air Pollution Control District was a the lead agent ' Preparing Transportation Control Measures for the 1891 Clean Air Pian. Six (6) addtti measures were proposed for further study. Following are summaries of each measure: a. Commute Alternatives Program (Rule 941) - This program is a phased employer bF_ trip reduction program to reduce commute vehicle trips and vehicle miles traveled thrc carpooling, transit, walking, bicycling, and other alternative travel modes. When adop this program will require employers to prepare and implement trip reduction progr sufficient to achieve a target Average Vehicle Ridership (AM. Businesses subject tc rule will be required to prepare a site specific trip reduction plan, designate a transport: coordinator, adopt an emergency ride home policy and maintain an on-site inform. center. Status: Whether or not final adoption and implementation of this speck program will o: is currently in question. A number of legislative proposals would modify the air distr ability to enact rules. The Air Pollution Control District cannot Include employers with than 100 employees. Nevertheless, the program is expected to move forward wr voluntary component for businesses with less than 100 employees. b. School-Based Trip Reduction Program (TRP)- The phased school-based trip reduc program aims to reduce the number of student commute vehicle trips during peak sc hours and midday private vehicle trips. The program requires schools with student- years old or older who arrive between 5:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. to implement trip reduct programs to encourage students to walk, bicycle, ride transit, or carpool. Status: The Air Pollution Control District is currently working with an advisory group m up of representatives from the affected schools to develop a proposed rule for adoption the APCD Board. c. city of San Luis Obispo Transit Improvements - This measure aims to improve tra. service by increasing service frequency to capture a significant number of new riders currently commute in single occupant vehicles. About 60%of these new transit riders we be destined for Cal Poly, the remaining 20%to other designations. A cooperative agreerr between affected agencies and the Air Pollution Control District is scheduled to developed to improve local transit service, thereby capturing new riders. 1993 CMP Tr/p Reduct/on and Travel Demand Management 00(-)09.5 pay TOTAL P.11 REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item: C-3 Through: Andrew J. Takata, City Manager Meeting Date: April 25, 1995 From: Henry Engen, Community Development Director Ne SUBJECT: Proposed revised SLORTA funding formula RECOMMENDATION: Endorsement of the proposed 49/18 funding formula. BACKGROUND: The attached communication from Ron DeCarli, Executive Director of the San Luis Obispo Council of Governments, provides background for this requested change in the funding formula for the San Luis Obispo Regional Transit Authority (SLORTA). ANALYSIS: There is currently a patchwork of historical formuli that has developed as transit systems have expanded, both within the county and within the county's cities. All of them require an off-the-top "contribution" to SLORTA, the county-wide system, and any change requires that all members have to approve such a change. At the February meeting of SLOCOG, several alternate formulas were considered and the alternate indicated in Column 4 of the attached staff report was recommended. This alternative would reduce the contributions of all seven cities (with Atascadero's "savings" being some $328), while increasing the contribution of the county but in less drastic fashion than some of the other alternatives. HE/AT:cw Enclosure: 4/10/95 funding formula request: SLOCOG III 00OC,.;C, San Luis Obispo Council of Governments Arroyo Grande Regional Transportation Planning Agency Gro sca L7 dero Metropolitan PlanningOrganization Morro Bay Paso Rob Pismo"eac Congestion Management Agency San Luis Obis, San Luis Obispo County April 10,1995 RECEIVED APS 4 Andrew J.Takata,City Manager i City of Atascadero 1�-------=--- ---_ 6500 Palma Ave. i;�TASCAD �u Ci �r „' s;;uER Atascadero,CA'93422 RE: SLORTAFunding Formulas Dear Mr.Takata; In February, SLOCOG directed staff to forward.a new regional transit funding formula to 'aif member- jurisdictions for their ratification. Over.the past several years a number of consultant studies have, recommended a regional funding formula to enhance the efficiency, flexibility, and effectiveness of the regional system. Prior,efforts to modify the formula have failed,as all previous efforts had both winners and losers, .As you. may recall,at the February,meeting SLOCOG was presented with several optional-formulas for funding regional transit services within.San Luis Obispo County. The options were developed as part.of Phase'i of SLORTA's Short Ran Transit Plan prepared by"Stephen A.Nukes&Associates"a consulting agency.hired by SLOCOG.to resolve this issue on behalf of SLORTA. The option approved by SLOCOG reduces the contribution to SLORTA for seven jurisdictions. This option is displayed in Column 4of Attachment A. The objective of modifying the formulas is twofold: 1 torovide relief tocity p ty SLORTA JPA members;by reducing or minimizing their overall TDkcontributions to the Regional Transit Authority,and 2)to provide route planners with the flexibility needed to'reduce or eliminate inefficient routes,and/or modify routes that have a potential for increased ridership. If the new formulas are Implemented, all city RTA member jurisdictions will see a decrease in their,TDA contributions to SLORTA. As you probably know,the currentfunding formulas have been deliberated for several years and as:a result have, been the subject ' t of several ,J consultant projects, the » ) latest bei ng the June 94 Regional Transit ImprovementStudy,p'repared by Nelson!Nygaard Consulting Associates. Unfortunately the funding issue was not reaalved at the close of t.'zat study and SLOCOG staff was di:ectad:,y tha Boa;d to resolve the funding ' issue before developing the service plan(Phase Il'of the Short Range Transit Pian). We would like to,take this opportunity to formally request that you agendize this funding formula item for deliberation by your City Council as soon as,possible., The SLORTA Joint Powers Agreement requires that all affected members of the JPA(in this proposal-each of the seven cities and the County) agree to any modif to thefundin formulas before the can be implemented.lemented. We are asking that each City Council , g Y p; approve O tion 4'in Attachment A. I will be available along with the Regional Transit Manager-Alan,Cantrell- to present the item to your Council and answer any questions/concerns they may have. Please don't hesitate to call me at 781-4219 or Alan at 781-4465 if you would like to discuss the merits of the funding formula modification as they relate to the City of Atascadero. Sincerely, Ronald L. De Carli Executive Director c:lwpwin6ftuzlietfeialfunWf wm.ata 0000917 1150 Osos St. Suite 202, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 ♦ Tel. (805) 781-4219 ♦Fax. (805) 781-5703 Attachment A San Luis Obispo Regional Transit Authority Funding Formula Proposal One of the main constraints on service improvements and/or efficiencies for SLORTA bus services(both CCAT and Runabout) are related to the current funding formulas, as service efficiencies are restricted by the "boundaries"related to each route's funding formula. If the formulas are revised as proposed in Column 4 below, transit staff will be able to modify routes to reduce costs and/or to increase ridership. The Table below identifies current TDA allocations for each SLORTA member jurisdiction, current member contributions to SLORTA, and a formula based on a fixed percentage contribution from the County and the City of San Luis Obispo. Column 1 shows the current population (1994 Department of Finance figures). Column 2 shows the total TDA allocated to each jurisdiction this current fiscal year(1994/95). Column 3 shows each jurisdiction's 1994/95 contribution to SLORTA. Column 4 shows the effects of a formula recommended by SLOCOG that allocates 49%of the costs of regional transit to the County,18%to the City of SLO,and then splits the balance required among the remaining cities based upon their percentage of the population of these cities. This formula was selected among a number Of similar alternative formulas,as this formula benefits all cities at the least cost to the County. It is proposed that SLORTA develop a"minimum level of service", perhaps four round trips on each of the main transit "corridors". The system would provide for funding this "basic" service level, which would become the backbone of the regional fixed route system. If a greater level of service is desired for a particular transit corridor,a formula would be developed to allow the affected jurisdictions to exercise this option. This arrangement would allow transit staff to recommend service adjustments to the Board to make the existing services more efficient,rather than being restricted by an individual city's fundin this would lead to an overall reduction in the regional transit budget. It is suggestedg participation. Additionally, the basic level of service remain constant throughout a five year period based on a short range transit plan,aunless resulting efficiencies, unusual circumstances or the unmet needs process dictates a change in the basic regional service plan. Column 1 COW 2 Column 3 COlunan .. Population Total TDA in 1994 SLORTA 1994Proposed Contribution Formula:4;af..'18;... Arro o Grande 15,146 290,204 86,723 Atascadero 24,342 492,663 130,976 Grover Beach 12,464 235,249 71,366 6.l;,89S Morro Ba 10,021 204088 61,016 53x784 Paso Robles 20,948 42,15 123,530 112,432 Pismo Beach 7,977 152,333 45,675 42,814 SLO Cit 43,7C 890,452 319,684 SLO Count 99,898 1,846,769 725,705 782,181 Totals 234,500 $4,537,387 $1,564,675 $1,564;675 Q0001118 f I REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item: C-4 From: Micki Korba, City Treasur r Meeting Date: 4/25/95 SUBJECT: Interim City Investment Policy RECOMMENDATION: City Council review and adopt Resolution No. 31-95 approving the City's Revised Interim Investment Policy. BACKGROUND: Prior to January 1992, State law required the City to review its Investment Policy on an annual basis. Although that mandate has been sunseted, it is nonetheless prudent to annually review the document. This text serves as an interim policy until such time as the proposed changes in the State law are completed by the Legislature. FISCAL IMPACT: No adverse impact is expected. MK:cw O0(?''. `t RESOLUTION NO. 31-95 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO TO ADOPT A REVISED INTERIM INVESTMENT POLICY WHEREAS, The City of Atascadero was required by state law to adopt an Annual City Investment Policy for idle funds; and WHEREAS, To maintain consistency and in accordance with Section 10.0 of the previous policy set forth in Resolution No. 144-93; and WHEREAS, It is the responsibility of the City Treasurer to propose such a policy as well as it is an indication of good business sense and prudent practice. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Atascadero does hereby adopt the attached revised Interim Investment Policy (Exhibit "A") to be followed by the City Treasurer and the Finance Director in the investment of the City's idle funds. On motion by Councilmember , seconded by Councilmember the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted on the following roll-call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ADOPTED: ATTEST: CITY OF ATASCADERO By: LEE PRICE, City Clerk R. DAVID BEWLEY, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: ARTHER R. MONTANDON, City Attorney APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: MURIEL C. KORBA, City Treasurer 000-11.00 Resolution No. 31-95 EXHIBIT "A" Page 1 CITY OF ATASCADERO STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY 1 .0 POLICY It is the policy of the City of Atascadero to invest public funds in a manner which will provide the maximum security while meeting the daily cash flow demands of the City of Atascadero and conforming to all state, county and local statutes governing the investment of public funds -- safety, liquidity, and yield (SLY). 2.0 SCOPE This investment policy applies to all financial assets of the City of Atascadero. These funds are accounted for in the City of Atascadero's Compre- hensive Annual Financial Report and include: 2.1 Funds 2.1 .1 General Fund 2.1 .2 Special Revenue Funds 2.1 .3 Capital Project Funds 2.1 .4 Enterprise Funds 2.1 .5 Trust and Agency Funds 2.1 .6 Retirement/Pension Funds 2.1 .7 Any new funds unless specifically exempted 3.0 PRUDENCE - Civil Code #2261 Investments shall be made with judgment and care--undercircumstances then prevailing--which persons of prudence, discretion and intelligence exercise in the management of their own affairs, not for speculation, but for investment, considering the probable safety of their capital as well as the probable income to be derived. 3.1 The standard of prudence to be used by investment officials shall be the "prudent person" standard and shall be applied in the context of .managing an overall portfolio. Investment officers acting in accordance with written procedures and the investment policy and exercising due diligence shall be relieved of personal responsibility for an individual security's credit risk or market price changes, provided deviations from expectations are reported in a timely fashion and appro- priate action is taken to control adverse developments. 000101 Resolution No. 31-95 EXHIBIT "A" Page 2 4.0 DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY - Per Government Code #53607 4.1 All solicitations for investments shall be made to and through the City Y Treasurer. 4.2 All brokers/dealers must have an application on file that has beenreviousl P Y approved before any investment can be made through them. 4.3 Two signatures shall be required for any purchase of C.D.'s or other type of investment, except LAIF. The two signatures shall be that of City Treasurer and Finance Director. If the latter is unavailable, the City Manager may substitute. 4.4 Any out-of-state investment shall require consultation with and approval of the City Attorney. State laws differ and additional requirements may be appropri- ate for the safety of any investment. 5.0 REPORTING 5.1 The Treasurer shall submit a monthly investment report to the City Council. This report will include all required elements of the monthly report as prescribed by California Government Code Section 41001 . Required elements of the monthly report: 5.1 .1 Type of Investment 5.1 .2 Institution 5.1 .3 Date of Maturity 5.1 .4 Amount of Deposit or Cost of the Security 5.1 .5 Current market value of securities with maturity in excess of 12 months. 5.1 .6 Rate of Interest 5.1 .7 Statement relating the report to the Statement of Investment Policy. 5.1 .8 Statement that there are sufficient funds to meet the next 30 days' obligations. 5.1 .9 Effective January 1, 1991 accrued Interest as prescribed by the California Government Code Section 53646. 000102, Resolution No. 31-95 EXHIBIT "A" Page 3 6.0 SAFEKEEPING AND CUSTODY All security transactions entered into by the City of Atascadero, including collateral for repurchase agreements, shall be conducted on a delivery-versus- payment (DVP) basis. Securities will be held by a third party custodian designated by the Treasurer and evidenced by safekeeping receipts. 7.0 DIVERSIFICATION The City of Atascadero will diversify its investments by security type and institution. With the exceptions of U.S. Treasury securities and the authorized pool--State LAIF, in which no more than three (3) months of the projected cash flow needs, excluding the separate TRANs repayment account, may be placed--no more than 10% of the City of Atascadero's total investment portfolio will be invested in a single security type or with a single financial institution. U.S. Treasury securities will have a minimum of seven (7) days and not more than six (6) months maturity. 7.1 Permitted investments/deposits--as allowed by State law Securities of the U.S. Government Certificates of Deposits Negotiable Certificates of Deposit Bankers Acceptances Commercial Paper Local Agency Investment Fund (State Pool) Passbook Deposits Repurchase Agreement Reverse Repurchase Agreements 7.2 Competitive Bids-Purchase and sale of securities should be made on the basis of competitive offers and bids when practical. 7.3 Purchases shall be made only with corporations in a rating category of "A" or its equivalent or better by a nationally recognized rating service. 8.0 MAXIMUM MATURITIES To the extent possible, the City of Atascadero will attempt to match its investments with anticipated cash flow requirements. Unless matched to a speci- fic cash flow, the City of Atascadero will not directly invest in securities maturing more than one (1) year from the date of purchase. 00010-1 Resolution No. 31-95 EXHIBIT "A" Page 4 9.0 INTERNAL CONTROL 9.1 A system of internal control shall be established and documented in writing. The controls shall be designed to prevent losses of public funds arising from fraud, employee error, misrepresentation of third parties, unanticipated changes in financial markets, or imprudent actions by employees and officers of the City of Atascadero. Controls deemed most important include: control of collusion, separa- tion of duties, separating transaction authority from accounting and recordkeeping, custodial safekeeping, clear delegation of authority, specific limitations regarding securities; losses and remedial action, written confirmation of telephone transac- tions, minimizing the number of authorized Investment Officials, documentation of transactions and strategies, and code of ethics standards. 10.0 STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY The Statement of Investment Policy shall be reviewed and submitted annually, within the first quarter of the new fiscal year, to the City Council of the City of Atascadero, State of California. MURIEL C. KORBA, City Treasurer City of Atascadero 000-104 MEETING AGENDA 17ATr'4/25/95 ITEM# C-5 .,_..� �oa 0qq.F City of EI Paso de Robles e e , �i2E �R21 Of �ilE I:JQ/21' RECM ED yO�l13 Zvi FE I April 10, 1995 ATASCADERC Cf Tti' r4i ;CEg y Andy Takata, City Manager City of Atascadero 6500 Palma Avenue Atascadero, CA 93422 Dear r. Takata: The City of Paso Robles is concerned with the potential economic impact of any closure or reduction of military activity at Fort Hunter Liggett. Clearly, such an action would have significant impacts on the entire San Luis Obispo and Monterey Counties region. Given the state of the region's economy, our City is very interested in doing whatever it can to assist in the effort to develop strategies to retain jobs. As evidence of the City's commitment w y e have appropriated $7,600 to assist with funding Monterey County's retention of a consultant to work with the region's agencies on this matter. Private businesses in our City have also committed $7,600 to this effort. We encourage the City of Atascadero to recognize the impact of the base closure to the region and contribute to Monterey County's effort as well as encouraging the City of Atascadero's businesses to join in the effort. Sincerel , Richard J. Ramirez City Manager c: City Council RJR:jaz City Manager 910 Park Street, Paso Robles, CA 93446 (805) 237-3888 FAX (805) 238-4704 00O L J,. APR 10 '95 03:33PM P. 1/3 �GpUNT � 9 MONTEREY EREY COUNTY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISOF --- - -- TOM PERKINS,CHAIR P.O.BOX 946 (408)385333 KING CII-V,CALIFORNIA 93930 (408)7555063 SIMON SALINAS 240 CHURCH STREET ROOM 211 SAUNAS,CAUFORNIA 93901 (408)7555011 JUDY PENNYCOOK 1000 SOUTH MAIN STREET SUITE 213 SAUNAS,CALIFORNIA 93901 (408)765-6022 WITH JOHNSEN,VICE CHAIR April 5, 1995 1200 AGUAJITO ROAD,SUITE 006 MONTEREY,CALIFORNIA 93840 (408)647.7744 SAMA KAKAS 1200 AGUAJITO ROAD,SUITE 001 MONTEREY,CAUFORNIA 93840 (406)647-7756 Mayor Walt Macklin City of Paso Robles 910 Park Paso Robles, CaliFornia 93446 S)UBJECT: Realignment of Fort Hunter Liggei Dear Mayor Macklin: The Department• of Defense has recommended that_ Fort Hunter Ligg ett be realigned by relocating the TEXCOM Experimentation Center (TEC missions and - functions to Fort Bliss, Texas. It is estimated that the realignment will result in the loss of approximatel686 jobs and a military and civilian payroll loss of approximately $23%. Preliminary studies indicate that the unincorporated area of Lockwood and the City of King and Paso Robles will have the greatest economic impact. I am writing to request that the City of Paso Robles commit a minimum of $15,000 to assist in the community's efforts to retain the TEXCOM Experimentation Center (TEC) at Fort Hunter Liggett. The consulting firm of Defense Realignment Advisors has been retained to work with the local Task Force in their review of the Department of Defense's recommendations and to develop a strategy to retain TEC and potentially expand the military missions at Fort Hunter Liggett. The Consultant will also prepare the community response to the realignment at the Base Realignment and Closure Commission (BRAC) regional hearing. On March 28, 1995, the Monterey County Board of Supervisors approved the transfer of $25,000 from the County General Fund to assist in fundin the total project cost of $50,000. An additional $25,000 is needed to ully cover the cost of the work to be completed by the consultant. Your assistance and cooperation in the community's effort to maintain the presence of the military and its economic benefits is greatly appreciated. a�1•/hlcJx.Ur 000-10 , APR 10 '95 03*39PM P.2/3 City of Paso Robles April 5, 1995 Page 2 An immediate response to this request is necessary so that the 'consultant can begin the work required for the local community toprepare for the BRAC regional hearings scheduled for April 28, 1995, in San Francisco. if you have any ques ' s, please call me at (408)755-5033 or Veronica Ferguson a (4 )755-5065. Tom Perkins, Chairman Monterey County Board of Supervisors . . . TP:MJC:dw APR 10 "95 03::33PM P.3/3 G April 95 Mayor Walter Macklin Paso Robles Mr. Macklin, Since T work for the current contractor at Ft. Hunter Liggett that would be relocated by the B RAC decision and as a resident of the North County, I did a quick count through the company phone book at work to Five you an idea of the amount of personnel this realignment would affect. Out of 221 names (all :VON- Department Of the Army, civilian types), i 0 (about 11,31) live from. Lake Nacimiento to San Miguel and south. An additional 72 (a 1/3) live in the Lockwood/Jolon area, which means that they do quite a bit of shopping in the Paso Robles area. The other folk live north of Jolon,from Bing City north to Pacific Grove. Even though this base is located in Monterey County, the impact on SLO county would be significant. The jobs include engineering(computer firmurarelsoftware and electronic hardware), electronic technicians, computer specialists, test managers, etc. High end jobs that for me earn 45K or more a year. The bottom line is that this county better bet off the dime since we stand to lose as much or more to the local economy as our neighbor to the north. Sincerely, 6��X�W/ Douglas Galford 5340 Hawk Midge Place San Miguel, CA 93431 000-198 REPORT TO CiTY COUNCiL Meet inig nate- 4,/25/95 CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda. Item: C-6 Through: Andy Taka-ta., City Manager From: Bradford Whltty. Finance Director SUBJECT:. Finance Director ' s report for the month of March 1995 , RECOMMENDATION: City Council receive this report , review and a.ccept . BACKGROUND: The purpose of this report is to communicate a. financial picture to the public and City Council on a monthly ha.Si.g _ These reports are, also a. tool t'o facilita-te thoughtful questions into the City' s financial condition ,; DISCUSSION: The statements for March represent 75% of the fiscal year . The first statement shows actcial revenues versus expenditures with the net position for the fiscal year . The second statement compares budget to a.ctuai with year-to-da.te. percentages , Keep in mind that some funds have seasonal f i uctua.t i nns in their revenues and expend i tures . thus their ca.icula.ted percentages may not coincide with the calendar percentage , The ne_x_t statement attempts to correct for the fluctuations by comparing actual amounts between two fiscal years . The fourth report illustrates the fund balance without. assuming accruals . The lastreport shows the outstanding accounts receivable that have been generated by the City. Some highlights of the March report are a.s follows : The City' s deveioper/impa.ct. fees have generally been lower than budgeted and is lower than theprevious year . 2 , General Fund revenues are i2 . 61/. behind on a. budgeted basis which ma.y catch up as property taxes come in during April and May, General Fund revenues a.re' ahead of last ye_.a.r-to-da.te dile_. mostly to Sales Tax Revenues . The Genera Funds actua l year-to-date loss may be e l i minated after the April and May property taxes , Page 2 , Agenda. Item C-6 . 3 , Dial-A-Ride. revenues are exceeding expenditures this year for several reasons . Ridership ha.s been steadily increasing and a. grant was received thatt wa.s for expenditures incurred in a previous year . Additiona.liv; expenditures are clown as compared to the previous year , This is a. good trend for Dial-A-Ride and honefuliy will continue , 4 . Overa.11_ , City revenues a.re down approximately ,R90 ,000 and expenditures are up approximately $340 , 000 as compared to last year-to-date a.ctuaIs , Note these figures have been adjusted for the Camino Real and Las Encina.s/3-F Meadows projects because the monies received and expended were financed rather than due to operations . The highlights presented here are not intended to he ail. inclusive , The notes to the reports convey additiona.i information regarding the City ' s financial condition . Piea.se refer to those notes . The City' s _fina.ncial position is only ba.lanced by the fact that. the City has been able to obtain a. TRAN every year . The City must focus on two major issues in order to correct its current problems . The City must cut expend tures and must ra.1SP_. reyenl7P_.S If neither or one of the,se happen , the City will not he successfui_ in correcting the problem, The City of Atascadero FINANCIAL. REPORT (Unaudited ) Nine Months Ended March 31 , 1995 75% of the Year REVENUES EXPENDITURES INC_.OME/ YTD ACTUALS YTD ACTUALS (LOSS ) ----------- ------------ ----------- General Fund $4 , 153 , 258 4353 , 107 (6997848 ) 1 Gas Tax 338 , 925 344 , 787 ( 5 , 862 ) Zoo Operations 123 , 789 17.3 , 868 ( 50, 079 ) Dial-A-Ride 308 , 089 233 , 944 741145 Wastewater 5511377 591 , 428 (40 ,051 ) Lake Pavilion 28 , 935 38 ; 32.3 (97388) Aquatics 137906 27 , 409 ( 13 , 503 ) Recreation 2651362 322 , 148 ( 56 , 786 ) Tree Planting Trust 5 , 920 2 , 914 37006 Sidewalk Trust. 41604 0 4 , 604 Emergency Services 41207 4 , 652 (445 ) Police Training 157405 18 , 059 ( 2 . 654 ) Weed Abatement 24 , 043 8. 84 23 , 159 A.D. #3 - Marchant 3 , 238 46 31192 A.D. #4 - Ca.yucos/Sespa.rado 517971 104 , 260 ( 52 ; 289) A.D. #5 - Chandler 172 421276 ( 42 , 104) A.D. #6 - Camino Real 109 , 125 150 , 584 (417459) ttal#7 - Las Encinas/3-F 54 , 537 83 , 824 (29 , 288 ) Debt Service 145 , 498 198 ; 495 ( 52; 997 )Projects 327 , 916 3191025 8 , 891 Police impact. Fees 9 , 233 7 , 893 11339 Fire Impact. Fees 30, 510 211395 9 , 115 Parks Impact Fees 521069 30 ; 000 22 , 069 Drainage Impact Fees 24, 769 0 24 ; 769 Amapoa-Tecorida. Fees 131576 41152 97724 Public Works 45 , 110 361027 9 .083 St . Maint . Districts 17162 0 1 , 162. TDA/Non-Transit. 15 , 077 18 , 722 ( 3 , 645 ) Sewer Facility Capita! 2627997 264 , 127 ( 1 , 130) Camino Real Construction 109 , 293 1051156 4 , 137 Las Encinas Construction 85 , .380 641746 20 , 634 3-F Meadows Construction 41 . 473 2 , 42.2 39 , 051 Santa. Rosa. A.D. 401319 0 407319 --------- ---------- ---------- Total City Funds $7 , 261 , 54.3 8 , 064 , 672 (803 . 129) ----------- ------------ ----------- 111INotes are an integral part of this statement . 0001,11 The City of Atascadern FINANCIAL REPORT (Unaudited ) Nine Months Ended March 31 , 1995 751/. of the Year BUDGET PERCENT 1994-95 YTD ACTUALS UNREALIZED ACTUAL./BUDGET ----------- ----------- ----------- -------------- REVENiTES ; General Fund 6 , 650 .880 4 . 153 , 258 2 , 497 . 622. 62 , 45% 1 Gas Tax 439 , 000 338 , 92.5 100 . 075 77 . 20% Zoo Operations 232 , 150 123 , 789 109 , 361 53 . 32% Dial-A-Ride 442, 713 308 ,089 134 , 624 69 , 59% Wastewater 1 ,033 , 912 551 , 377 482 , 535 53 , 33% Lake Pavilion 37, 7$0 28 , 935 8 , 845 76 , 597. Aquatics 39 , 316 13 , 906 25 , 410 35 . 37% Recreation 447 . 93R 265 , 362 182 , 476 59 , 25% Tree Planting Trust 6 , 011 5192.0 91 98 , 480/. Sidewalk Trust 5 . 000 4 , 604 396 92 , 08% Emergency Services 10 , 000 4 , 207 5 , 793 42 - 07% Police Training 20 , 000 15 . 405 4 . 595 77 , 03% Weed Abatement 40 , 000 24 , 043 15 . 957 60 , 11% A.D, #3 - Ma.rcha.nt 61900 3 . 238 3 . 662 46 . 93% A,D. #4 - Cayucos,/Sespa.ra.do 92 ; 000 51 . 971 40102.9 56 , 49% A.D< #5 - Cha.ndier 200 172. 28 86 , 00% A.D: #6 - Camino Real 109 , 125 1091125 0 100 .00% 2 A.D. #7 - Las Encina.s,/3-F 54 , 537 54 , 537 0 100 . 004 COP Debt Service 150 . 500 145 , 498 5 , 003 96, 68% Capital_ Projects 8141738 327 , 916 486 , 822 40 , 2.5% Police Impact Fees 21 .000 9 , 233 11_ . 767 43 , 96% Fire impact Fees 44 , 300 301510 13 ; 790 68 , 871Y. Parks impact Fees 751000 52 . 069 2211931 69 , 43% Drainage impact. Fees 40 , 200 24 . 769 15 , 431 61 , 61% Ama.poa.-Tecorida Fees 28 , 220 13 . 876 14 ; 344 49 , 17% Public Works 92 . 000 45 ; 110 46 . 990 49 . 03% St , Ma.int . Districts 2 ; 100 1 , 162 93R SS . 32% TDA/Non-Transit 43 , 000 15 . 077 27 . 923 35 , 06% Sewer Facility Ca.pit.a.l 405 . 100 262 . 997 1421103 64 , 92% Camino Real Construction . 90 , $45 1097293 ( 18 ; 44R1 120 . 31% 2. Las Encinas Construction 21000 85 . 380 (8_3 , 3801 4269 , 00% 2 3-F Meadows Construction 41 , 473 41 . 473 0 100 . 00% 2 Santa Rosa. A.D. 401319 40019 0 100 . 00% 2. ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Tota.1 City Revenues 11 , 558 . 157 7 . 2611543 4 . 296 ; 614 62 . 83% ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- The Notes are an integral part of this state- ent 0r; � . . ' The City of Atascadero FiNANCi_AL REPORT ( Unaudited ) Nine Months Ended March 31 , 1995 75% of the Year BUDGET PERCENT 1994-95 YTD _A_CTii_ALS UNREALIZED ACTUAL/BUDGET ----------- ----------- ----------- -------------- EXPENDITURES General Fund 61643 , 477 4 , 853 . 107 1 , 790 , 370 7.3 , 05% Gas Tax 496 . 695 344 , 787 151 , 908 69 , 42% Zoo Operations 2.71 , 965 173 , 868 981100 63 , 93% Dial-A-Ride 411 , 254 233 , 944 177 , 310 56 , 59% Wastewater 941 , 224 591 , 428 349 , 796 62 , 84% Lake Pavilion 48 , 377 381323 10 , 054 79 . 22% Aquatics 33 , 266 27 , 409 51857 82 , 39% Recreation 444 , 333 3227148 12.6 , 185 71 , 85% Tree Planting Trust 7 , 300 2 , 914 4 , 386 39 , 92% Sidewalk Trost 0 0 0 0100% Emergency Services 12 , 000 4 , 652 77348 38 , 77% Police Training 207000 14 ; 059 1 , 941 90 , 30% Weed Abatement 40 , 000 484 39 , 116 2 , 21% A,D. #3 - Marchant. 8 ; 304 46 8 , 258 0 , 55% A,D, #4 - Ca.yucos/Sespa.ra.do 99 , 475 104 , 260 (4 , 745 ) 104 , 81% A ,D, #5 - Chandler 42 , 276 42 , 276 0 1001 , 00% 2 A,D. #6 - Camino Real 150 , 584 150 , 554 0 100 , 00% 2 A.D, #7 - Las Encina.s/3-F 831424 53 , 424 0 100 , 00% 2 COP Debt Service 198 , 500 198 , 495 5 100 , 00% 2 Capital Projects 8121642 3197025 493 , 617 39 , 2.6% ice Impact Fees 21 , 000 7 ; 893 137107 37 , 59% e impact. Fees 44 , 300 21 ; 395 22005 48 , 30% Parks Impact Fees 30 , 000 301000 0 100 , 00% Drainage Impact Fees 40 , 200 0 40 , 200 0 . 00% Amapoa.-Tecorida. Fees 12 , 500 4 , 152 5 , 349 33 , 21% Public Works 927000 36 . 02.7 551973 39 . 16% St . Ma.int . Districts 30 , 000 0 30 , 000 0100% TDA/Non-Transit 43 . 000 151722 24 , 278 43 , 54% Sewer Fa.cilit.y Capital 662 , 500 2.647127 398 , 373 39 , 57% Camino Real Construction 455 , 000 105 , 156 349 , 844 23 , 11% Las Encina.s Construction 135 , 000 64 , 746 70 , 254 47 , 96% 3-F Meadows Construction 70 ; 000 2 ,422 677578 3 , 46% Santa. Rosa. A.D. 0 0 0 0 , 00% ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Total City Expenditures 12, 405 , 000 5 , 064 , 672 4 , 340 . 327 65 , 01% ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- TOTAL NET REVENUE/(EXPEND, ) (446, 543 ) (503112.9) (43 , 714 ) 94 , 54% The Notes are an integra.l. Part of this statement . 0(11 The City of Atascadero FINANCIAL, REPORT (Unaudited ) Nine Months Ended March 31 , 1995 75% of the Year March 94 March 95 YTD ACTUAL, YTD ACTUAL $ CHANGE ----------- ----------- ----------- REVENUES : General Fund 4 , 11772.64 4 , 153 , 258 35 . 994 Gas Tax 341 , 768 338 , 925 ( 21843 ) Zoo Operations 127 ; 106 123 , 789 ( 3 , 317 ) Dial-A-Ride 329 ; 030 3081089 (20 , 941 ) Wastewater 687 , 113 5511377 ( 1351736) Lake Pavilion 251655 28 , 935 3 , 280 Aquatics 16, 344 13 , 906 ( 2, 438) Recreation 275 , 457 2651362 ( 10 , 095 ) Tree Planting Trust 37370 5 , 920 2, 550 Sidewalk Trust 27249 4 ; 604 21355 Emergency Services 1 , 579 4 , 2.07 2 , 628 Police Training 5 , 208 15 , 405 10 , 197 Weed Abatement 25 , 547 24 , 043 ( 1 , 504 ) A.D. #3 - Marchant 4 , 192 37238 (954 ) A.D. #4 - Cayucos/Sespa.ra.do 47 , 208 51 . 971 4 , 763 A.D. #:5 - Chandler 151762 172. ( 15 , 590) A.D. #6 - Camino Real 168000 109 , 125 ( 58 , 875 ) A.D. #7 - Las Encinas/3-F 47 , 799 547537 67738: 1 COP Debt Service 991787 145 , 498 45 , 711 Capital Projects 213 , 379 327 , 916 1147537 Police Impact Fees 12 , 757 91233 ( 3 , 524 ) Fire Impact Fees 34 , 713 30 , 510 (41203 ) Parks Impact Fees 59 , 383 52 ; 069 ( 71314 ) Drainage impact. Fees 48 , 675 241769 (231906) Amapoa-Ter_.orida Fees 271170 13 , 876 ( 13 , 294 ) Public Works 71 , 144 45 , 110 (261034 ) St . Ma.int . Districts 3 , 518 17162 ( 2 , 356) TDA/Non-Transit 19 , 489 151077 ( 47412) Sewer Facility Capital 285 , 799 2621997 (221802) Camino Real Construction_ 17805 , 667 109 , 2.93 ( 1 , 6967374) 3 Las Encinas Construction 622 , 688 85 , 380 ( 537 , 308) 3 3-F Meadows Construction 377 , 293 41 , 473 ( 335 , 820 ) 3 Santa Rosa. A.D. 0 40019 40 , 319 ----------- ----------- ----------- Total City Revenues 9 , 922 , 113 772611543 ( 2 ; 660 , 570 ) The Notes are an integral part of this statement . 000.14 The City of Ata.sca.dero FiNANCIAI, REPORT (Unaudited )_ Nine Months Ended March 31 , 1995 75% of the Year March 94 March 95 YTD ACTUAL. YTn ACTUAL $ CHANGE ----------- ----------- ----------- EXPENDITURES : General Fund 41610 , 457 41853 , 107 242 , 650 1 Gas Tax 268 , 634 344 . 787 76, 153 Zoo Operations 181 , 605 173 , 868 ( 7 , 737 ) Dial -A-Ride 3091965 233 , 944 ( 76 ,021 ) Wastewater 679 , 427 591 . 428 (86 , 999 ) Lake Pavilion 38 , 238 38 , 323 85 Aquatics 28 , 657 27 , 409 { 1 ; 248 } Recreation 299 , 757 322 , 148 22 , 391 Tree Planting Trust 2 ; 262 2 , 914 652 Sidewalk Trust. 0 0 0 Emergency Services 0 4. 652 4 , 652 Police Training 11 , 843 18 , 059 6 , 216 Weed Abatement 22 ,847 984 (21 , 963 ) A.D, #3 - Marchant 0 Ori 46 A.D. #4 - Ca.yucos/Sesparado _111 , 134 104 , 260 ( 6 , 874 ) A.Dt #5 - Chandler -1R . 521 42. 276 `1 . 69'1 A.D, 46 - Camino Rea.1 36, 880 150, 584 1_ 131704 3 A.D, 47 - Las Encina.s/3-F 341921 93 . 824 48 , 903 3 COP Debt. Service 162 , 489 199 . 495 36 , 006 Capital Projects 2661620 319, 025 52 , 405 00ice Impact Fees 2.71500 7, 893 ( 191607 ) :e Impact Fees 1 , 500 21 395 19 . 895 ' Parks Impact Fees 15 , 000 301000 15 , 000 Drainage Impact Fe_.es 664 0 ( 664 ) Ama.poa.-Tecorida. Fees 111171 4. 152 ( 7 , 020) Public Works 19 . 598 36. 027 16 , 429 St. , Maint , Districts 0 0 0 TDAI Non-Transit 50 , 958 1R , 72.2. ( 321236) Sewer Faciiity Capital 322 , 351 264 . 127 Camino Real Construction 941 , 212 105 . 156 (836; 056 } 3 Las Encina.s Construction 134 , 2.25 64, 746 { 69 , 479 } 3 3-F Meadows Construction 138 , 234 2. 422. ( 1 .35 , 812) 3 Sa.nta. Rosa. A.D. 0 0 0 ----------- ----------- ----------- Total City Expenditures 817651732 8 , 064, 672 { 701 , 060} ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- TOTAL NET CHANCE AMOUNT 1 , 1561381 (803 , 12.9 ) f1 , 959 , 510 ) ----------- ----------- ----------- The Notes are an integral part of this statement , The City of Atascadero Notes to the Financial Report Nine Months Ended March 311 1995 7.5% of the year (Unaudited) NOTES: 1 . The General Fund will receive approximately $1 million in property taxes in April and May, thus effectively eliminating the loss shown. The $242 , 000 expenditure over previous year ' s is due primarily to the increased premium on the City' s insurance . 2 , Assessment District #6 Camino Rea.l ., and Assessment District #7 Las Encinas/3-F Meadows ., were not originally budgeted at the beginning of the year and at mid-yeas , Therefore ., the budgeted amounts shown will match actual ,,; until the final budget revision is brought to council- at the first meeting in June . 3 , The proceeds from the sale of bonds were receive(-i in the previous fiscal yea.r . Thus the revenues and expenditures are substantially different. as compared to the present fiscal year . 4 . The past due miscellaneous debt s un icomprised of paid TOT ' s from a local moteI . - - - Staff' is reviewing-- the, potential for collection with a loca.1 a.ttorney- 000,11ILS