Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 03/14/1995 * PUBLIC 'REVIEW COPY Please do not remove from counter is AGENDA ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING CITY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 6500 PALMA AVENUE, 4TH FLOOR ROTUNDA ROOM Tuesday, March 14, 1995 7:00 P.M. This agenda is prepared and posted pursuant to the requirements of Government Code Section 54954.2. By listing a topic on this agenda, the City Council has expressed its intent to discuss and act on each item. In addition to any action identified in the brief general description of each item, the action that may be taken shall include: A referral to staff with specific requests for information; continuance; specific direction to staff concerning the policy ormission of the item;discontinuance of consideration;authorization to enter into negotiations and execute agreements pertaining to the item; adoption or approval,• and, disapproval. Copies of the staff reports or other documentation relating to each item of business referred to on the agenda are on file in the office of the City Clerk (Room 208) and in the y Information Office (Room 103), available for public inspection during City Hall business hours. The City Clerk will answer any questions regarding the agenda. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in a City meeting or other services offered by this City,please contact the City Manager's Office ((805) 461-5010) or the City Clerk's Office ((805) 461-5074). Notifica- tion at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time when services are needed will assist the City staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting or service. RULES OF PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: PLEASE SEE BACK PAGE CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS PRESENTATIONS: O Presentation by Ellen Sturtz, S.L.O. County TV Franchise Coordinator COMMUNITY FORUM: Please see "Rules of Public Participation" (Back Page) A. CONSENT CALENDAR: All matters listed under Item A, Consent Calendar, are considered to be routine, and will be enacted by one motion in the form fisted below. There will be no separate discussion on these items. A member of the Council or public may, by request, have any item removed from the Consent Calendar, which shall then be reviewed and acted upon separately after the adoption of the Consent Calendar. 1. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - February 14, 1995 City Clerk recommendation: Approve 2. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - February 28, 1995 City Clerk recommendation: Approve 3. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - March 2, 1995 (Mid-Year Budget Session) City Clerk recommendation: Approve 4. FINANCE DIRECTOR'S REPORT - January, 1995 Staff recommendation: Review and accept 5. APPROVAL OF WARRANTS FOR MONTH OF FEBRUARY, 1995 Staff recommendation: Review and accept 6. RESOLUTION NO. 25-95 Supporting Senate Bill 1 X: Proposal to waive local match for securing disaster relief funds Staff recommendation: Adopt t 7. RESOLUTION NO. 24-95 - Authorizing amendment of fees for notary services Staff recommendation: Adopt 8. ACCEPTANCE OF SLOPE REHABILITATION PROJECTS IMPROVEMENTS Staff recommendation: Accept and authorize release of 10% retention 9. RESOLUTION NO. 21-95 - Approving mid-year amendments to the 1994-95 adopted budget Staff recommendation: Adopt 10. RESOLUTION NO.27-95-Designating City representatives authorized to execute State Office of Emergency documents for certain federal financial assistance Staff recommendation: Adopt B. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS A. Resolution No. 22-95 - Amending Circulation Element to designate EI Bordo as a "collector" street (GPA 94001; Berean Baptist Church) Planning Commission recommendation: Adopt 2 B. 6000 San Palo: 1. Resolution No. 13-95 - Approving an amendment to the General Plan Land Use Map by redesignating certain real property at 6000 San Palo from Low Density Single Family to Tourist Commercial (GPA 94003; Summers) Planning Commission recommendation: Adopt 2. Ordinance No. 285 - Amending the official City zoning map by rezoning subject real property from RSF-Z to CT (ZC 94004) Planning Commission recommendation: (1) motion to waive reading in full and read by title only, and(2)motion to introduce on first reading by title only C. 3555 EI Camino Real: 1. Resolution No. 11-95 - Approving an amendment to the Land use Map by redesignating subject property from Suburban Residential to Moderate Density Single Family Residential and including the site within the Urban Services Line (GPA 94005; Pentecostal Church) Planning Commission recommendation Adopt 2. Ordinance No. 284-Amending the official City zoning map by rezoning subject real property from RS to RSF-Y (ZC 94006) Staff recommendation: (1) motion to waive reading in full and read by title only, and (2) motion to introduce on first reading by title only C. REGULAR BUSINESS: 1. LAS ENCINAS/3-17 MEADOWS ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS - Final project cost and action on SLTPP Grant fund reimbursement Staff recommendation: Review and provide direction 2. ORDINANCE NO. 286 - Amending the Zoning Ordinance text and map to establish a Planned Development Overlay Zone No. 11 for the 3-F Meadows Ranch Development project (ZC 94001; Davis Family Trust) Staff recommendation: Adopt on second reading by title only 3. ECONOMIC ROUND TABLE RECOMMENDATIONS A. Resolution No. 01-95 - Affirming advisory committee's purpose and revising membership ERT recommendation: Adopt B. Downtown zoning - Initiating text amendment to allow offices on the first floor in the Pedestrian Retail Overlay Zone ERT recommendation: Approve 3 4. RESOLUTION NO. 23-95-Adopting Revised City Facility Policies, Procedures and Fees Staff recommendation: Adopt A. City parks and facilities policy & fee adjustments B. Revisions to Charles Paddock Zoo admission fees 5. CITIZEN TASK FORCE FOR ECONOMIC RECOVERY - Alternatives Staff recommendation: Approve Added 6. RESOLUTION NO. 28-95 - PROCLAIMING THE EXISTENCE OF A LOCAL EMERGENCY Item D. COMMITTEE REPORTS (The following represent ad hoc or standing committees. Informative status reports will be given, as felt necessary.): 1 . S.L.O. Council of Governments/S.L.O. Regional Transit Authority 2. City/School Committee 3. County Water Advisory Board/Nacimiento Water Purveyors Advisory Group 4. Economic Round Table 5. Finance Committee 6. Highway 41 Realignment Community Advisory Committee 7. Air Pollution Control District 8. Upper Salinas River Coordinated Resource Management and Planning Committee 9. North County Council E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION: i 1 . City Council 2. City Attorney 3. City Clerk 4. City Treasurer 5. City Manager 4 RULES OF PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: The City Council welcomes and encourages your ideas and comments as a citizen. To increase the effectiveness of your participation, please familiarize yourself with the following rules of decorum: o Members of the audience may speak on any item on the agenda, in the order the item(s) are addressed by the Council, as directed by the Mayor. Items not on the agenda should be submitted during the Community Forum period (see below). O Persons wishing to speak should step to the podium and state their name and address, for the official record. O All remarks shall be addressed to Council, as a whole, and not to any individual member thereof. o No person shall be permitted to make slanderous, profane or personal remarks against any elected official, commissions and staff. o A person may speak for five (5) minutes. sp o No one may speak for a second time until everyone wishing to speak has had an opportunity to do so, and no one may speak more than twice on any item. o Council Members may question any speaker; the speaker may respond but, after the allotted time has expired, may-not initiate further discussion. o The floor will then be closed to public participation and open for Council discussion. COMMUNITY FORUM: o The Community Forum period is provided to receive comments from the public on matters other than scheduled agenda items. o A maximum of 30 minutes will be allowed for Community Forum, unless Council authorizes an extension. o State law does not allow the Council to take action on issues not on the agenda; staff may be asked to follow up on such items. CITY COUNCIL C MMENTS: Add Urgency Item { RESOLUTION NO. 28-95 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA, PROCLAIMING THE EX�STENCE OF A LOCAL EMERGENCY i WHEREAS, Government Code Section 8630 et seq. and Title 4, Chapter 4 of the Atascadero Municipal Code empowers the City Council to proclaim the existence or threatened existence of a local emergency when the City is affected or is likely to be affected by a public calamity or crippling disaster; and r WHEREAS, conditions of extreme peril to the safety of p 'rsons and property have arisen within the City of Atascadero because of devastating f oods resulting from heavy rainfall; and a WHEREAS, the City Manager, as the designated Dire4tor of Emergency Services, did find that the aforesaid conditions .of extreme peril warranted and necessitated the proclamation of the existence of a local emergehcy; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 4-4.07 of the Atascadero Municipal Code, the City Manager did, on Thursday, March 9, 1995, declare a state pf local emergency for the City of Atascadero. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Atascadero as follows: SECTION 1 . It is hereby proclaimed that a local emergency did exist in the City of Atascadero as a result of devastating floods. SECTION 2. The state of local emergency was declored at 5:00 p.m. Thursday, March 10, 1995 by Andrew J. Takata, City Mamgvr. Said proclamation is hereby ratified by the City Council. SECTION 3. It is hereby proclaimed that the local emergerOcy was terminated at 8:00 a.m. on Monday, March 13, 1995. a On motion by Councilperson and seconded by Councilperson the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted it its entirety on the following roll call vote: I! AYES: NOES: i ABSENT: i i Resolution No. 28-95 Page Two ADOPTED: ATTEST: CITY OF ATASCADERO By: LEE PRICE, City Clerk R. DAVID BEWLEY, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: ARTHER R. MONTANDON, City Attorney + 1 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER ° SAN LUIS OBISPO. CALIFORNIA 93408 • 805-549-5450 M , AGHWA D TF 3 14 95 ; Fj�jTAI 9 i i February 10, 1995 i Mr. Ray Johnson, Councilmember City of Atascadero 6500 Palma Avenue a Atascadero, CA 93422 Re: Community Access Dear Councilmember Johnson: During the last quarter of 1994 the County of San Luis Obispo spons4rred meetings omm communication gest input from the governmental and educational communities as well as cd ty providers regarding a county wide community access planning consortium. The primary focus was on access to cable TV, but included other technologies suci as the Internet and video-conferencing to satisfy shared communication needs. The meetings were well attended and the enthusiasm for going forwa d was palpable (see attached participant list). Much of the success of the gatherings car be attributed to the community participation and the knowledge and skill of the public access consultant who facilitated the meetings. In an effort to move forward and to be eligible Ifor upcoming federal matching grants, the group requested that the County compose j a memorandum of s understanding to be signed by all interested parties. I Attached is a copy of the draft MOU which includes-a funding proposalp to support the participation of the consultant for the remainder of the fiscal year. County jurisdictions who collect cable N franchise fees are being asked to contribute based on the number of cable TV subscribers in each of the communities. Future expenditures will beproposedby the task force during the initial planning stage. The Countyis looking for your City's support Collectively we can a advantage �e power emerging technologies that are not available to individual institutions aid harness of the technology in cost-effective ways. Such an effort will also strengthen coordinated, county-wide communications to address challenges that do not recognize jurisdictional and organizational boundaries. j The task force's initial objectives are to: 1. Create an integrated two to three year video communication plan that will incorporate the use of technology now available,including cable N,SLONET(Internet)and video conferencing to enhance distance learning/training,promote community activities such as tourism, and cover meetings and events. 2. To conduct an inventory of resources available in the County to help establish short term applications. 3. To pilot one or more short term activities to demonstrate the potential of the technology. 4. To determine how to best organize the task force and,if necessary, how to best stay organized beyond the fife of the task force. WHAT IS BEING ASKED OF YOU AT THIS TIME? 1. To place Ellen Sturtz, County Franchise Administrator, on your council agenda on February 28 to discuss your support of the consortium and the draft MOU. 2. To instruct your appropriate staff to work on finalizing the document for your Council's signature. Please call Ellen Sturtz at 781-5239 if you have any questions. Thank you for your cooperation with this matter. Sincerely, DAVID BLAKELY, Chairperson Board of Supervisors Attachments File: Community Access pvo:bl\a 0835jn0M i D w r J 0 CL J Q U Ld O C13 O 2 F.. w zul Q 2 U H (n ti J � a o 0 to QZ4? 1 ' aoo ti Cl) X co co 2 Q c � N O LL' U a co rn to ch r Cl) O O �' 0) to 4m V w w v O a (D co co Y Cl) U Z ch ti CV N r cn M Q O CO v Ln O U') r N 0. Z v F-- to Z ti D O O U_ Q C7 O O o Q U H TV N O O > N N Z J 0 co ca N m N co v J O Nd � O 65 U) 65 ° U_ C') ° U c0 O N w0 y0 CU) to � � N O Oa m0 c U U ce)a 0m C N U o O Q � m O Q to D a� o � T `—' 0 � gr�i oc> U Nrn � tia cn O O O O Z <a 0 C O L O _N a V p d m y w O C Q U) �U U 0 V V c+�jc� U W d as o 0 c`o N rn - 4) � V p Q �_ Q m U c a R U E c - ca of N N U 4) U - c= fl. N O N faca 0 C E 0 7 ca cu- ca N H � aELU a Q ca u � -03 Lm cn XJ ~ F- o ' nE3 Lauz OL EO 'DOD O N O O ca �o ci C: -1 co ) �Z X a O X 0 - CUy 0 0O0. 0 14 Y O t4 m O V to 30 OO OO 7N OO � O OO Z Q � Q4. Cow m10 fon_ ca (D COtn ca U4. Ut0 U4 O W uj U) J Q O U Z m W LU @ W F- J Z Q O o `f rn co co p _ Z to O Cl)chto O p N O Q n v .- m co 1L t) uv) m m O co N v I� to v co LO N O t0 LUm N ch CN m m p O e— N co O O 0 CD a0 `? Q N O cj N Z L, v cn M co v Vcn OV fl- co O r U') N v ^ V) � to tj co co N v 0 °" v ^ 0 a O :B p U .- �.. O O C a- O O co .20. ch N VO O N VO C 7 m O Q N p O Q � y Jfh (n ul c OCf O ^ U NQ � Q m _� � v aQ Q _0M a a cU w c o mo a � � Q C O S OC `UQ O O E N N co O O o. w o O CD ca � E mO jV U00 a c ° j °� ov �vi < o to -> a 0 (4 -� J O U Cn J (CII O J cII tII O C U cQj 7 ti 7 C fII h C N dj C U C (n N Q CO U S O co U m CL cII y� C > cII N U � U- 0) cn E C H C H OQ (nQ 7 cIIcc v►-i Up co � � a� o c 'y °� � U y m � QQ QN Z Y co lL m —Cj O U C Q J Y U J �O C - dO U0 z u j o o c a y x > o ai ccII o co m L m ) Q ao Um 3m 0m �� om v� g> 3 cr m = a . Q = 0 00 ° 0 �_ (D w 0 � c -V U- < c U) 00 Z m � U4_ UQ. 0 U- N ILr Or Stn = O SQ S • r O C � a � U • W X J Q O 2 W Q 0 0 1 U > ? zz O O U i w 0 0Q 2 Z > W CO) 0 d' I- r.. X ~ CD co co ao ti co v Vco tr) IT U.. v n N V Go f` ti � ch m LO V— Co O r N N (0 co cn O r- N Cl) r • ZqT CD to IT N 04 o C14v m co M v Cl) qT LO CL c ti N t9 p N O .N T ca =• p Q > C C cm o U ls- c ca m' o U p C p N C cc,W.. LQ V clic6p n Q Oq U NUL p p V 7 0 � ° C?] p` 0 O cn U U E cn .. U CL c 'n �(n ctsO mas QU ocn ° � � c � wU Qa— Q c. W 0 � c .y Qo c-0 Uc m � o � � � V N ° Vm cam ; Co CO) w � (D 4 R � � _ CD CO NUO j °�' m `� C Q0 0 m U U cca c c :3 0 °3 G -a co- 0 0 °f V S E 7 `� H Q N cn LU o, cc o p o U n c p U co 4 Z3 `o A cw o o ° ino -1v c0 c � � R o ° c Z O w 2 vV ° Q � v O ~ o `n ° w U) _Lm cc m o Nom. cn °� H • O m ca Z om p Z ca c $ � �' ° � 2 m ° ° Q J Q p L ° ° C N m r� U g c p c a 0 > U U) �� m v rn O ° R T -a c rn ca c N L o o v co Q Q .N 4 _ >,v c O E o E to v Q r Q U m cn °� ° o CU @ O p = '� O 0 m C CA pj O L N c' m (D z C.) > ca � � = p � p a� v, mE L X oc U ° mac ' • d co E icts s Y - o _ ZLLI ° ° N N ° ° fn 0] �C N �'J Y m0 CL m co O p V! Lm L 0c ca LO ccv api0 a°> c° 0m •- Z00 0 —°i n. Jcq Jn. JQ W W Q cl: c~n O J 0 U Z O 0 Z � � Z W U @2 z z j w Z m m W LO +n co o tO rn O O c7) to O N Z .- r O r r N to cn e– N M � �L —1 Q � LL. U-) 0 1`') P- m) CD rOMi 00 f� c�) � ccq ti Cl) N z Cl) Ch P- a0 r- .– 1% O N to 0 Z C6 CO - ti N ti � V- t[) • O M �' t. cD I I �t cD aD co C v v N v co (0 d Z to 'T ti n to In u) X 10 n v cD 00 C O.t O � CD ca y O U o N Z O Qc •yN 4) ° `° m r OQ°OL vO c (aO N •E Q `� ` O > � U (9 c oai cD w cl) O 0 Q p OCm N Q l] U vn U� Q O " eaO fn N EM M iuj N p N -0 Q �� m Um m �UM w - m mo O o c00 Ee O ma � UQ Zo E oom � cm o Qw � 4)a0 ° cavm o 0 c cU ca Q W '� ` c�a �� ori c c R � O cam m aci U � Q Z co 0 vvi � J N •`5O m` cn o 0o Q) �nU DC7 m mQ Q U c m rn y m U � 0a) 00 3 a� m e °. Cts m o }- ,�co v c to 4) l— U ¢ Q: 0 U o 0 3 ca .m ti V U U C (3 'a CL .II .to N LL_ U Q U C rn `a 00 m o n y c v°, _ M °� c� o E Z g1O 0 me m � m � ° ago tO oN XC13 N � x m a c z o a) Em o W D X mU W N m c m = Q aci o c m w = c O O flT N LO • v o o Fo L^! mm v � Q o` 0 m (0 a') 0 o U 0 0 — 0 v m u to ? o m 0 Co Z Q. Q. Q_ tO � Q. Q: Y � Q: N In N CL to iq to U I— CL > O w t= z w 0 z J z OJ H fn (r W @) Z w p Q Ulz —, a. z m p N - o O �o cD co z am O ti n X �L c%) c%) Q c v co v I � .n v I � .- N CD O Cl) O t.- W to O Cl) '- O O in Z O O C7 O Cl) co co tn (n i = O 00 v r yf CD co fh r aZ °n° ctooLoE v v v n m n O C U 3 � ro E m co cn U v m N Q O vm N U a1 U of N N Q O 0 O c� U W ani U 4) vc Oa Uc a: cn O 'a (D C) o c Q d c a. OU cQ ` c`o Yv p g `m c`aa � U 0 mrn Qa c° Q O co O o ° U Q z E v_, v o o Q-aa Lu �U Q C HJ_ � N U U UQ U V O z ca Q E ca fn m v v a cc Bm P c O � : Q° � Qc6 � za O O m U j y= U oc w E N ... F-' U Q N ca a0 U d L u) v ca cs _ 2M Z LO a. ELin �,_ —oi cl N 'y 0 m a U N NX a) = O m 0 p Cm c > 77 yy 7 m Z 30 ,- 50 } I ' 1 WORKING DRAFT 1 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING 1995-1997 r HISTORY i i Cable TV access channels typically provide community-oriented programming, such as local news, public announcements, distance education and government meetings. They are usually programmed by individuals or local organizations, on either public, education or government channels (PEG). Under the 1984 Cable Act, local franchising authorities could require that cable operators set aside channels for PEG use. In addition, franchising authorities could require cable operators to provide services, facilities, and equipment to support the use of these channels. For the most part, cable franchises within San Luis Obispo County have not contained PEG provisions until recently. Over the years, there has been interest in PEG, but there was no sustained, coordinateCountof effort to put PEG into place for the San Luis Obispo County community. The San Luis Obispo recently signed two cable franchise renewals with PEG provisions, and is now interested in helping to coordinate a joint effort of all the County communities around this issue. Since cable TV is only one means of solving some of the communication issues shared by County communities, otheralso bee ermined as part of a ommunication technologies, such as phone, Internet access, wireless and others would joint effort. We often read about the"convergence of technologies"and about the wonders the future will bring. As we each prepare our organizations for the future, being able to take advantage of these technological opportunities quickly will benefit all our citizenry. A joint effort of the governmental and educational institutions in the county, as well as the public and private sectors opens new opportunities for us. Collectively we can take advantage of the emerging technologies that are not available to individual institutions and harness the power of the technology in cost effective ways. Such an effort will also strengthen coordinated, county-wide communications to address challenges that do not recognize jurisdictional and organizational boundaries. In November 1994 the County initiated an investigation htfromresources the govemmental'and might be. Three meetings were convened with representatives educational communities as well as the public and private sectors to identify resources in the county and to discuss shared communications needs and the potential benefits of creating joint solutions. A variety of communication tools including cable TV, satellite and microwave communications, Internet access and videoconferencing were Obisdiscussed po County potential vehicles to address unmetet n fo tion needs of the inning a task forceso puran sue a county-wide citizenry. There was a strong interest communications plan to address these common needs. Of particular interest were the enhancement of: 1. Distance learning for continuing education, staff development and expanded use of existing facilities 2. Coverage of government/education meetings and community events 3. General public information which includes everything from meeting agendas, pet adoptions to tourism PURPOSE To form a task force comprised of members of the governmental and educational communities as well as the public and private sectors entrusted with planning for a San Luis Obispo County Consortium for Community Media. TERM A two year term , beginning March 1, 1995 through February 28, 1997,(dates can be changed if we are delayed in adopting the MOU) to allow for adequate time to create a planning document, pilot activities, establish a long-term infrastructure, 'if necessary, and to seek state and federal grant opportunities. . PARTICIPANTS Members of the task force will enter into this agreement at different levels (a list of participants will be included in the final, so please let me know in your response how you want to be listed): Contributing Members are those organizations that are making a financial commitment to the effort at least for the remainder of the fiscal year, as outlined under'!the section titled Financial Considerations. These members may or may not choose to be'�actively involved in the task force itself, but will be kept informed of its activities. (I am assuming that this group will be made up of the cities and the County, but anyone is welcome and encouraged to participate at this level) Task Force Members are those individuals who will actively participate in the workings of the group during the two year period. This is the core group who will ensure that the Objectives of the task force are met and report back to their organizationsas well as to the Contributing Members. Friends of the Task Force are individuals and organizations that are willing to assist the task force on a limited basis, occasionally. This may take one of many forms including, but not limited to in-kind services, labor or financial resources. G i 2 ' { OBJECTIVES 1. To create an integrated two to three year video communication plan that will incorporate the use of technology now-available, including: a.. Cable TV: A textual interactive bulletin board system Selected coverage of meetings and events Distance education and training b. SLONET/Internet: Increase community access and create opportunities for information providers C. Phone: Video conferencing, distance learning and other applications 2. To conduct an inventory of resources available in the County to help establish short term applications 3. To pilot one or more short term activites to demonstrate the potential of the technology 4. To determine the structure of organization beyond he It e a k force force FINANCIAL found necessary, the organization that is form FINANCIAL. CONSIDERATIONS As part of the planning process the task force will explore a variety of ways to fund activities including grants, partnerships and others. Meetings will be held in public facilities at no or little cost. The only cost presently proposed is the expense to support a community access consultant/facilitator to assist the task force. (Remember this is only a proposal) The consultant will be supported through the remainder of fiscal year 94-95 through funds provided by the cities and the County based on the number of cable TV subscribers in each community. Schuler & Associates, the consulting firm that worked with the group in November, estimates this additional work to cost approximately$18,000. The chart below lists each jurisdictions financial commitment: # CABLE % OF TOTAL COSTPER JURISDICTION SUBSCRIBERS (To number)narest JURISDICTION To nearest 50a w Arroyo Grande 4,500 8 $1,440 5,500 10 $1,800 Atascadero . 3 #CABLE % OF TOTAL JURISDICTION SUBSCRIBERS (To nearest COST PER To nearest 500 whole number) JURISDICTION Grover Beach 3,500 6 $1,080 Morro Bay 4,000 7 $1,260 Paso Robles 5,500 10 $1,800 Pismo Beach 3,000 5 $900 San Luis Obispo 12,000 21 $3,780 San Luis Obispo County 18,500 33 $5,940 (The scope of services for the remainder of the fiscal year and a sketch of the remaining two year period will be attached). Future expenditures will be proposed by the task force and brought to the appropriate decision making bodies for approval. CLAUSE TO EXIT TASK FORCE SIGNATURE BLOCK FOR YOUR JURISDICTION File: Community Access m:lleanneleslmou2.wpd 4 i .jgenda Item: A-1 Meetings Date: 03/14/95 ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL i FEBRUARY 14, 1995 i MINUTES 3 The Mayor called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Councilperson Luna led the Pledge of Allegiance. { ROLL CALL: I i Present: Councilmembers Carden, Highland, Jo4nson, Luna and Mayor Bewley Absent: None Also Present: Muriel "Micki" Korba, City Treasurer and Lee Price, City Clerk Staff Present: Andy Takata, City Manager; Henry En'ogen, Community Development Director; Art Montandon�' City Attorney; Brady Cherry, Director of Community! Services; Brad Whitty, Finance Director and Lt. Bill Watton, Police Department COUNCIL COMMENTS: Councilman Luna announced the availability of World Wide Web, a gomputer network link, and urged the Council to consider methods for getting on ;the "information highway" The Mayor introduced Doug Carter from Andrea Seastrand and recognized Jeff Wegg, representing Jack O'Connell's office. a CC 02/14/95 Page 1 I SPECIAL PRESENTATION: o Recognition of an Exemplary Volunteer Mayor Bewley presented a City watch to veterinarian, Dr. Steve Robinson, in appreciation for volunteering his time to the Charles Paddock Zoo. Claudia Collier, General Curator, also expressed gratitude and presented the doctor with a special tool. Dr. Robinson indicated that it was an honor and privilege to work at the Zoo and explained that he would continue to volunteer his services. COMMUNITY FORUM: Rush Kolemaine, Potrero Road resident, spoke out in opposition to a recent decision made by members of the Council of Governments (COG) regarding the Highway 41 realignment project. Jim Edwards, 2800 El Camino Real, also expressed displeasure with COG's vote on the Highway 41 project and urged the Council to consider reducing participation in COG. He suggested that the Council initiate plans to formulate a new regional planning agency for the North County. Eric Greening, 5th district California Transportation Advisory Committee (CTAC) delegate, stated that COG's decision had not been a vote to kill the Highway 41 realignment project. He commented that COG, as a body, is uncomfortable with accelerating the project without completing concurrently improvements to the intersection of 101 and 41. Susan Knowles, 3355 Ramona Road, read a prepared statement updating the City Council on the Atascadero Recreation Center Committee (ARCC) (see Exhibit A). Allan Weaver, Santa Lucia Road resident, announced that the Atascadero Mural Association is being formed and is a new idea for regenerating and revitalizing the downtown area. The City Manager suggested that Mr. Weaver meet with Brady Cherry and members of the Parks and Recreation Commission. Marj Mackey, member of the Atascadero Land Preservation Society, reported that funds have been raised in the amount of $9,400 to date and announced two upcoming fund raisers. Eric Greening, speaking once more, noted that the San Luis Obispo City Council will be discussing the Salinas River Area Plan on Tuesday, February 21 st and encouraged attendance. CC 02/14/95 Page 2 A. CONSENT CALENDAR: 1. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES January 10, 1995 Staff Recommendation: Approve as Submitted 2. APPROVAL OF WARRANTS FOR THE MONTH OF JANUARY, 1995 Staff Recommendation: Approve certified City accounts payable, payroN and payroll vender checks for the months of December, 1994 and January, 1995 3. RESOLUTION NO. 06-95 -Authorizing the City Engineer to sign quitclaim deeds on behalf of the City Staff Recommendation: Staff requests continuance 4. RESOLUTION NO. 07-95 - Designating a stop intersection on Cale Court at Portola Rd. Traffic Committee Recommendation: Adopt 5. RESOLUTION NO. 08-95 - Designating a stop intersection on Valle Ave. at Palomar Ave. Traffic Committee Recommendation: Adopt 6. RESOLUTION NO. 05-95 -Authorizing traffic signal maintenance contract with Lee Wilson Staff Recommendation: Adopt Mayor Bewley pulled Item #A-1 for correction. MOTION: By Councilman Highland, seconded by Councilman Luna to approve the Consent Calendar, Items #A-2 through 6; motion passed 5:0 by roll calf vote. Re: Item #A-1 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - January 10, 1995! Mayor Bewley asked that the motion on page 7 of the Minutes be amended. MOTION: By Mayor Bewley, seconded by Councilman Carden to approve the Minutes, as amended; motion adopted unanimously. B. PUBLIC HEARINGS: No items scheduled. CC 02/14/95 Page 3 C. REGULAR BUSINESS: 1. AUDIT - June, 1994 Report Staff Recommendation: Accept and Approve Brad Whitty presented the 1994 audit and responded to numerous questions from the City Council. There were no questions or comments from the public. MOTION: By Councilman Carden, seconded by Councilman Luna to accept and approve the June 1994 audit;motion approved 5:0 by roll call vote. 2. ORDINANCE NO. 283 -Amending Title 7 of the City Municipal Code (Sanitation Ordinance) relative to sewer connection time limits Staff Recommendation: Adopt on second reading by title only Henry Engen provided the staff report and recommendation. There were no questions or comments from the public. MOTION: By Councilman Carden, seconded by Councilman Luna to adopt Ordinance No. 283 on second reading by title only; motion passed 5:0 by roll call vote. 3. RESOLUTION NO. 09-95 - Designating a no-parking zone on Marchant Way at Pismo Ave. (adjacent to the Lake Park Pavilion) Traffic Committee Recommendation: Adopt Henry Engen provided the staff report and recommendation to approve. Councilman Johnson indicated that he would prefer to see the matter deferred until other alternatives for parking can be explored. He suggested that staff look at options for expanded parking at the existing parking lot and/or around the AARP building, or by creating additional parking at what is currently the Parks Division & Zoo storage yard. Brady Cherry noted that the service yard at the Zoo is needed for vehicle and equipment storage. Councilman Johnson asked whether or not staff had considered moving the service yard to another site. Brady Cherry commented that it is more efficient if staff have the equipment they need on site. Andy Takata noted that the Atascadero Zoo Master Plan has explored the issue of parking and recommends that the "bone yard" be removed. Councilman Luna agreed that additional study was warranted and emphasized that people need to be able to walk safely around the Lake. Lengthy discussion ensued. CC 02/14/95 Page 4 Public Comments: Carl Lownes, 9550 Marchant Way, spoke in favor of the resolution and asserted that consideration for parking should have been made before the Pavilion was completed. He suggested that City storage areas by the Zoo be moved to another location to allow for additional parking. He noted that people find it more convenient to park on the street and expressed concern for pedestrian safety. Mr. Felli, 8320 Portola Road, also spoke in support of the resolution and voiced concern for the safety of those who like to walk around the Lake ---End of Public Testimony--- MOTION: By Councilman Johnson, seconded by Councilman Luna to send the matter back to staff to look at alternatives for additional parking; motion passed unanimous/y. MOTION: By Councilman Carden, seconded by Councilma1n Luna,to approve Resolution No. 09-95; motion passed 5:0 by rio/i ca//. 4. PUBLIC NOTICING METHODS AND REPORT OF ASSOCIATED COSTS Recommendation: Discuss and provide staff direction Brad Whitty provided an overview public noticing related costs and explained that the City is reimbursed by the State for only six percent (6%) of the total annual costs. The City Clerk summarized present noticing methods and highlighted suggestions for improving the process. Discussion and individual recommendations followed. Councilman Johnson proposed that a brochure be made available to members of the public informing them of the local legislative process. Mayor Bewley encouraged citizens to take some responsibility in finding out what is before the City Council. Councilman Luna indicated that if the City elects to subscribe toSLONET (regional information access via telecommunications), as is being recommended by staff), the agenda could then become available to the public by computer at the Library. Councilman Carden recommended that staff individually notify members of the public who have petitioned the City, by way of application, whenever the matter is placed on either the Planning Commission or City Council agenda. Brief discussion ensued regarding a recent City Council meeting at Which an applicant for a General Plan Amendment was not formally notified that the matter would be on the City Council agenda. Henry Engen reported that the Planning Commission is presently looking at the General Plan Amendment process and is considering CC 02/14/95 • Page 5 eliminating preliminary Planning Commission/City Council review before the matter goes to public hearing. Public Comments: Rush Kolemaine commented that the property notice format needs improvement and suggested that the City pursue a public information channel access to cable, which Falcon Cable TV is federally required to provide. Councilman Johnson noted that the City is already looking at this. Lon Allan, Atascadero News, suggested that staff alert the newspaper by sending news releases via fax machine. Lindsay Hampton, 8205 Alta Vista, suggested that better placed and larger notices in the newspaper would help attract reader attention. Eric Greening commented that computer access at the Library should not replace the "hard" or paper copy of the agenda. ---End of Public Testimony--- Councilman Luna spoke in support of three worthy, inexpensive suggestions to improving the process (SLONET, Falcon TV-Channel 6 and improved news releases). He also pointed out that the public can request an agenda via fax by calling the Clerk's Office. Councilman Johnson recommended that staff get the word out about where agenda packets are available. Councilman Carden reiterated the need to notify individuals who are affected and encouraged staff to take extra effort. Councilman Luna asked that staff add who is making the recommendation on the agenda face sheet (.e., staff, Planning Commission, Traffic Committee, etc.). Andy Takata reported that staff is in the process of creating an administrative policy relating to noticing process. D. COMMITTEE REPORTS (The following represent ad hoc orstanding committees. Informative status reports will be given, as felt necessary.): 1. S.L.O. Council of Governments/S.L.O. Regional Transit Authority Councilman Carden reported on the meeting of February 8. Action taken, he stated, included the adoption of a general work plan, approval of a transit plan and authorization of a revised legislative agenda. He clarified that COG's decision relating to the Highway 41 realignment project was not to terminate the project, but rather to delay it for eighteen months. He asserted that the delay will cost the general public CC 02/14/95 Page 6 additional money, will expose the City to more time,delays, affect the City's plan for economic development and tie up individuals who own land in the right-of-way. He proclaimed that regional authorization of local projects was taken out the hands of the locally elected officials who represent the public. 2. City/School Committee - Councilman Johnson reported that the committee had met and explored ways to save costs through joint economic efforts. 3. County Water Advisory Board/Nacimiento Water Purveyors Advisory Group - Councilman Highland reported that the County Water Advisory Board had met and continued discussions regarding the revised County Water Master Plan. 4. Economic Round Table - Councilman Johnson announced that the round table would meet on Wednesday, February 22 at 7:30 a.m. in the Club Room. 5. Finance Committee - Councilman Luna reported that the committee had met on February 7th and 8th to discuss the Orange County Investment Pool situation, the audit, the City's Tax & Revenue Anticipation Notes and investment policy. 5. Highway 41 Realignment Community Advisory Committee - Henry Engen reported that the next meeting will be February 23, ,1995. 7. Air Pollution Control District - Councilman Carden announced that the APCD will meet on February 24th in an open study session to examine expanded duties and responsibilities. He indicated that the district will meet regularly on the last Wednesday of every odd month. B. Upper Salinas River Coordinated Resource Management & Planning Committee - Councilman Highland announced that the committee will meet on February 22, 1995 at 7:00 p.m. to review the Upper Salinas River Groundwater Management Program. E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION: 1. City Council By mutual consent,the City Council directed the City Manager to attend the California CC 02/14/95 Page 7 Transportation Commission meetings scheduled for February 22nd and 23rd in Sacramento. On the agenda will be the City's Transportation Enhancement Act grant application for Stadium Park and the Highway 41 realignment project. Councilman Johnson asked by what process the application for Long Valley Ranches 11 can be brought back for Council re-consideration. He noted that the matter had previously been before the City Council at which time a 2:2 split vote resulted in no action. The City Attorney and Community Development Director were asked to provide the City Council with a response. Mayor Bewley reported that the Mayor of San Luis Obispo has requested a joint meeting with the City Councils of both cities. Councilmembers Highland and Carden indicated that they had no desire to meet with San Luis Obispo because of recent events. Councilman Highland added that the only reason San Luis wants to meet with Atascadero is because they want North County water. Councilmembers Luna and Johnson indicated that they would be willing to meet with San Luis. Councilman Johnson commented that the City of EI Paso de Robles has also been asked to meet with San Luis and they are willing to do so. The Mayor indicated that he would be willing to meet, but added that the Atascadero Mutual Water Company should also be invited if the agenda should include discussions regarding water. By mutual agreement, it was decided that Mayor Bewley would meet with Mayor Settle of San Luis Obispo to discuss the agenda, ground rules and expectations for a joint meeting. The mayor will report back to the Council. . Councilman Luna mentioned that there will be a reception for Senator Jack O'Connell at his new district office in San Luis Obispo on Friday, February 17th. 2. City Clerk Lee Price reported that Atascadero resident Jim Rodger has resigned from the Citizen Transportation Advisory Committee where he has served for eight years as the City's at-large delegate. The Clerk is currently soliciting interested citizens to apply. The City Clerk also reported that a Council sub-committee had met the previous day to interview five local teens who have applied to serve as the Youth Representative to the Parks & Recreation Commission. She indicated that a recommendation from the sub-committee would be coming forth on the February 28th Council agenda. 3. City Manager Andy Takata mentioned that staff would be coming back with a time line and report on implementation regarding recommendations made by the Development Review Ad CC 02/14/95 Page 8 Hoc Committee. The City Manager also announced that a "Youth in Government Day" is being coordinated by Brady Cherry and Community Services Department staff on Wednesday, March 29th. Details are forthcoming he said. In closing, the City Manager provided a summary of items on the next City Council agenda. F. CLOSED SESSION: At 9:52 p.m., the Mayor adjourned to Closed Session for purposes of.- 1. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR: Negotiator: City Manager Employee Organizations: Service Employees International Anion, Atascadero Police Officers Association, Atascadero Sergeants Service Organization, Atascadero Safety Technicians Organization, Mid-Management Bargaining Unit, and Management Bargaining Unit 2. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION: Employee: Police Officer At approximately 10:30 p.m., Closed Session was adjourned. The City Attorney reported that no agreements had been reached and direction was given to the City Manager. THE NEXT MEETING OF THE ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL W141 BE THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 23RD AT 7:00 P.M. FOR PURPOSES OF CONDUCTING A REVIEW OF THE CITY'S BUDGET AT MID-YEAR. (Note: Meeting was later postponed to Thursday, March 2nd at 7:00 p.m.) MINUT7it AND PREPARED BY: LEE ICE, City Clerk Attachment: Exhibit A (ARCC) CC 02/14/95 Page 9 Atascadero Recreation Center Committee ARCC P.O. box 2322 d [i; Atascadero Ca. 93423 �[ , February 13, 1995 FB 141995 Members of City Council: Chin ClER1t oMC ` This is a progress report of the Atascadero Recreation Center Committee at the end of the term of current officers, many of whom are continuing in their positions. In addition to the Community Development Block Grant of $47,000.00 that was awarded to ARCC last year for seismic retrofit of the Youth Center, the fund raising efforts by ARCC to date has generated $22,000.00 from private contributions. We have several grant applications pending for both programming and Facility development as well as continuing to work hard raising private monies within the community. In keeping with our commitment to support the City of Atascadero as stated in ARTICLE I OF THE ARCUS BY LAWS...."The purpose of the Atascadero Recreation Center Committee Inc. (ARCC) is to develop a recreation center for the use of the citizens of Atascadero and to assist the City of Atascadero with funding and program development to assure the availability of the center for young people. ARCC shall provide funds and advice to assist the City of Atascadero with the development of necessary building(s) and recreation programs to offer the youth of Atascadero a positive peer environment." We have begun our part to assist the City of Atascadero in their efforts to provide a successful Youth Center, a motion was made at the ARCC board meeting of January 26, 1995 , by Jack Heninger. The motion stated as follows... "Upon receipt of a monthly budget from Atascadero Recreation Dept., which may include salary expense, up to $1,000.00 per month be made available on a reimbursement basis to the city of Atascadero for Teen activities from the month of March through December 1995. In the event that the Youth Center is not available such activities may be conducted at alternate locations." The motion was carried unanimouslyM By making $10,00.00 of ARCC's private contributions available for teen activities and events, the ARCC Board believes we are keeping fund raising in the forefront. The constant attention to and exposure of the Youth Center will only emphasize the importance of the Youth Center. The necessity of the seismic retrofit, as well as facility development, will become even more evident and rally the community interest and involvement. As a community reminder: ARCC Board elections are in March. Anyone interested in serving on the Board should contact the nominations committee member Barbie Butz @ 461-1234 and leave a message. **The approval of this report was given by the ARCC Board members. Written by: Sheree Ricketts, Publicity Chair. Presented by: Susan Knowles, Treasurer. Agenda Item: A-2 yN,leeting Date: 03/14/95 i ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL FEBRUARY 28, 1995 MINUTES The Mayor called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. and led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL: Present: Councilmembers Carden, Highland, Johnson, Luna and Mayor Bewley i Absent: None Also Present: Muriel "Micki" Korba, City Treasy rer and Lee Price, City - Clerk Staff Present: Andy Takata, City Manager; Henry Engen, Community Development Director; Art Montandon, City Attorney; Brady Cherry, Director of Comounity Services Brad Whitty, Finance Director; Mike M Cain, Fire Chief; Lt. Bill Watton, Police Department; Steve ylvester, City Engineer; John Neil, Assistant City Engineer nd Steve DeCamp, City Planner 3 COUNCIL COMMENTS: Councilman Luna requested support for Senator Jack O'Conrtell's bill, SB 1 X, relating to disaster relief funding. Staff was directed to bring the matter back at the next regular Council meeting. Councilman Highland asked staff to bring back the sewe hook-up ordinance for consideration of a distance limitation for required-hook-up. aff will bring the matter back at a future Council meeting. CC 02/28/95 Page 1 PROCLAMATION: Mayor Bewley read the proclamation for "Arbor Day", March 7, 1995 and presented it to Bruce Boni#us of the Atascadero Native Tree Association. Mr. Bonifus invited all to attend the Arbor Day celebration planned for March 11, 1995 at the Lake Park Pavilion and provided a summary of the day's events. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS; o Special Presentation to City Council by Atascadero Mutual Water Co. Grigger Jones, Atascadero Mutual Water Company President, Board Member Leroy Davis and Ken Weathers, Executive Manager, presented a framed 1912 topographical survey map with overlay to the City Council. Mr. Jones indicated that the map was on loan from the Water Company and asked that the City Council display it proudly. o Special Presentation to Jim Rodger for 8 years service on Citizens Transportation Advisory Committee Mayor Bewley read and presented to Jim Rodger of Atascadero a framed resolution of the San Luis Obispo Council of Governments recognizing his service on the Citizens Transportation Advisory Committee. COMMUNITY FORUM: Rush Kolemaine, Potrero Road resident, announced a DeAnza Trail celebration would be held on Saturday, March 4 at the Wranglerette Arena. William Zimmerman, Lomitas Road resident,requested that the City Council reconsider recent action creating a No Parking Zone next to Atascadero Lake. Rush Kolemaine read a letter to the City Council dated February 25, 1995 alleging Brown Act violations relating to the February 21 , 1995 Planning Commission meeting. Mr. Kolemaine asserted that the agenda had not been posted pursuant to State Law. The City Clerk provided a report on posting practices and assured the City Council that the Planning Commission agenda had been posted accordingly. A. CONSENT CALENDAR: 1. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - January 24, 1995 City Clerk recommendation: Approve CC 02/28/95 Page 2 2. NORTH COUNTY SUMMIT MINUTES - January 31, 1995 City Clerk recommendation: Approve t 3. FINANCE DIRECTOR'S REPORT - December, 1994 Staff recommendation: Review and accept 4. CITY TREASURER'S REPORT - January, 1995 Staff recommendation: Review and accept 5. RESOLUTION NO. 17-95 - Demanding that the Orange County Board of Supervisors accept responsibility for the Orange County Investment Pool bankruptcy and that it return 100% of the deposited funds to the City of Atascadero and all other pool investors Staff recommendation: Adopt 6. RESOLUTION NO. 12-95 - Communicating concerns regarding the Public Utilities Commission's deregulation of electricity Recycling Committee recommendation: Adopt 7. RESOLUTION NO. 06-95 - Authorizing the City Manager to sign a quitclaim deed releasing claims against excess right-of-way (Hoff--W. Mail/EI Camino Real signal) Staff recommendation: Adopt 8. RESOLUTION NO. 16-95 - Authorizing the execution of an agreement with Kuentzel, Henderson and Associates for architectural design services for the Atascadero Youth Recreation Center Renovation Project Staff recommendation: Adopt Councilman Johnson pulled Item #A-5. Eric Greening pulled items #A-1 & 5. MOTION: By Councilman Luna, seconded by Councilman Highland to approve the Consent Calendar Items #A-2, 3, 4, 7 & 8; motion passed 5:0 by roll call vote. Re: Item #A-1.CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - January 24, 1995 City Clerk recommendation: Approve Eric Greening questioned the meeting date noted in the Council of Governments Committee Report on page 9. Councilman Carden corrected the date. Councilman Highland noted a name change on page 5. CC 02/28/95 Page 3 J MOTION: By Councilman Johnson, seconded by Councilman Luna to approve the Minutes, as amended;motion approved unanimously. Re: Item #A-5. RESOLUTION NO. 17-95 - Demanding that the Orange County Board of Supervisors accept responsibility for the Orange County Investment Pool bankruptcy and that it return 100% of the deposited funds to the City of Atascadero and all other pool investors Staff recommendation: Adopt Eric Greening noted that he had pulled this item to voice his support. MOTION: By Councilman Luna, seconded by Councilman Highland to adopt Resolution No. 17-95; motion carried unanimously. Re: Item #A-6. RESOLUTION NO. 12-95-Communicating concerns regarding the Public Utilities Commission's deregulation of electricity Recycling Committee recommendation: Adopt Councilman Carden stepped down due to a possible conflict of interest. Councilman Johnson suggested that the word, "protection" in the last paragraph of the resolution be changed to "consideration". There was consensus to amend the resolution as proposed. MOTION: By Councilman Johnson, seconded by Councilman Luna to adopt Resolution No. 12-95; motion passed 4:0. Public Comments: Mike Cassiday, San Benito Road resident, indicated that he was representing a group of Pacific, Gas & Electric (PG&E) employees who wished to talk to the City Council about the realities of the Public Utility Commission's decision to de-regulate electricity. Councilman Luna explained that the purpose of this resolution is to address corres- ponding impacts upon the ability to comply with State mandates relative to recycling) and solid waste reduction. He assured the speaker that the City Council was not specifically dealing with PG&E or the issue of de-regulation. The City Clerk noted that a full copy of the resolution was available on the back table for review. North River Road resident Charles R. Strong commended the City for its cost recovery program that allows the City to collect fees from PG&E for emergency personnel stand-by during electrical emergencies. ---End of Public Testimony--- CC 02/28/95 Page 4 Councilman Carden returned to the dins. B. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. 3-F MEADOWS RANCH DEVELOPMENT A. Final Environmental Impact Report Consider certifying that the EIR is adequate and in full compliance with CEQA Planning Commission recommendation: Certify B. Ordinance No. 286 - Amending the Zoning Ordinance text and map to establish a Planned Development Overlay Zone No. 11 for this 802-acre project Staff recommendation: (1) motion to waive reading in full and read by title only, and (2) motion to introduce on first reading by title only C. Resolution No. 14-95 - Summarily vacating a portion of a road pursuant to Streets & Highways Code; Part 3, Public Streets, Highways and Service Easements Vacation Law; Chap. 4, Summary Vacation; 8330 (being portions of San Marcos, Cholare, Escal rasa, San Felipe, San Cayetano and Madrone Roads) Staff recommendation: Adopt • D. Lot Line Adjustment 94-005 - Changing 114 residential lots and 1 water tank lot to 111 residential lots, 3 open space lots and 1 water tank lot Staff recommendation: Approve Steve Decamp, City Planner, presented the staff report and recommendations. He submitted a revised map to Resolution No. 14-95 (see Exhibit A). Consultant David Foote, SEDES, provided an overview of the Final Environmental Impact Report. Fire Chief Mike McCain expressed gratitude to the applicants for cooperation with the City in designing the development. Councilman Luna also voiced appreciation and noted that the development as proposed is a much better project than what had been presented five years ago. Council comments followed regarding proposed walking paths along Laurel and Cenegal (Condition #F-11). There was mutual Council concern regarding pedestrian safety and pathway design. John Neil responded to questioms. Discussion ensued regarding a site for a radio repeater station. Steve Decamp reported that the Davis Family Trust is willing to dedicate a site for the repeater CC 02/28/95 • 1 Page 5 station but noted that staff is reluctant to recommend a Condition of Approval at this time because there is no site yet determined suitable. Chief McCain indicated that a prime location on San Marcos Road has been approved by the Atascadero Mutual Water Company Board of Directors but reported that the City does not have the funds to construct the facility. Public Comments: Dan Lloyd,representing the applicants, expressed appreciation to staff for accessibility and professionalism. He also thanked the Atascadero Homeowners Association for their cooperation and input into the design process. Mr. Lloyd spoke in support of the project and asked for approval of the staff recommendations and proposed substituting a Class II base material instead of the decomposed granite referenced in Condition #F-11 (pathways). He also confirmed that the applicants were willing to work with the City in locating a site for a radio repeater station and are committed to restricting second unit dwellings. Don Saueressig, 10735 San Marcos Road, recommended that the City identify a site in the development for a radio repeater station and make it a part of the Conditions of Approval. He emphasized that prospective buyers deserve to know in advance where the repeater station is going to be located in the future. The speaker also asked whether or not the City has a communications plan. The Fire Chief later noted that the City has an excellent Communications Plan, but noted that funds are not available. Eric Greening, 7365 Valle, commented that the project design was well thought-out and the EIR was exemplary. He added that he hopes that the project and the EIR will become a standard by which others are judged. Bob Lilley, 11850 San Marcos Road, shared concerns regarding access into the development and remarked that he would have preferred to see the access to project via Highway 41. Lindsay Hampton, on behalf of the Atascadero Homeowners Association, read a prepared statement in support of the project (See Exhibit A). Ann Holly, 9665 Laurel Road, urged the Council not to accept the EIR as adequate because it does not recommend appropriate mitigation measures. Art Montandon and David Foote responded to questions the speaker had regarding the road abandonment. Gordon Edmonds, 9747 Laurel Road, commented that he had some serious concerns regarding safety and disputed estimated average daily trip numbers as presented in CC 02/28/95 Page 6 the EIR. He asserted that a bridge over Graves Creek connecting Laurel Road and San Lucia is the obvious solution and urged Council to consider ita Doug Conner, 12170 Cenegal Road, also expressed support for a bridge solution and voiced concern for the safety of approximately 47 children in the existing subdivision. He suggested that walking paths be clearly separated from the roadway. Marcia Torgerson, 6200 Llano Road, read a prepared statement (see Exhibit B) in support of the project. Gail Swazey, Laurel Road resident, commented that she was concerned that there may be unforeseen drainage problems after homes are built on the hilltops. She also spoke in favor of a bridge solution and proposed that construction be paid for by lot assessment. Gordon Edmonds, speaking once more, reiterated that a bridge is the right solution to alleviating traffic impact to the neighborhood. Dan Lloyd, applicant's representative, addressed some of the comments made by the public. He indicated that although he was willing to discuss a bridge solution, the EIR did not identify a significant impact and felt that a bridge was not warranted. He commented that he believed concerns regarding the pedestrian link can be addressed through ample improvements, road widening for consistency and Class II base material construction. Councilman Luna asked the speaker if there were any conditions the applicants were uncomfortable with. Mr. Lloyd indicate that there were none and added that the applicants are willingly to incorporate all approved conditions. ---End of Public Testimony--- Staff responded to questions from members of the City Council regarding on-site road improvements and trip analysis. Individual Council comments followed. Councilman Johnson suggested that the pavement on Laurelry,and Cenegal Roads be striped and encouraged neighborhood input in the design of the pedestrian walkway. He added that staff should carefully monitor the traffic situation and consider including in the Capital Improvement Plan(CIP) a bridge over Graves Creek connecting Laurel and Santa Lucia Roads as a long-term solution to traffic concerns. Mayor Bewley spoke in favor of approving the project. Councilman Carden agreed and pointed out that there had been a great deal of community input. Councilman Highland asserted that the project will impact existing residences and the CC 02/28/95 Page 7 i _ _ 1 City Council cannot do anything about it. He contended that those who benefit from developing a project should pay for all necessary improvements. Councilman Luna agreed and emphasized that the City Council needs to acknowledge the fact that the City's infrastructure is failing apart. He pointed out that the City's development fees are half of what most other cities in the County charge and proclaimed this to be one reason why the City does not have the funds necessary to improve and repair streets, as well as support new and existing development. He recommended that the issue of development fees needs to be re-visited. Regarding the project, Councilman Luna stated that was in favor of approval and pledged support to working with the neighborhood to mitigate concerns. There was Council consensus to amend Condition of Approval #F 11 (relative to pedestrian walkways) by changing "decomposed granite" to "Class 11 base or other all-weather material". The City Council took the following actions: MOTION: By Councilman Carden, seconded by Councilman Luna to certify the EIR; motion passed unanimously all by roll call vote. MOTION: By Councilman Carden, seconded by Councilman Luna to waive reading of Ordinance No. 286 in full and read by title only; motion passed unanimously. MOTION: By Councilman Carden, seconded by Councilman Luna to introduce Ordinance No. 286, as amended on first reading;motion passed 5:0 by roll call. MOTION: By Councilman Carden, seconded by Councilman Luna to adopt Resolution No. 14-95as revised; motion passed 5:0 by roll call vote. MOTION: By Councilman Carden, seconded by Councilman Luna to approve Lot Line Adjustment 94-005, as recommended by staff; motion passed 5.0 by roll call vote. The Mayor called a recess at 10:43 p.m. At 10:45 p.m. the meeting resumed. C. REGULAR BUSINESS: 1. RESOLUTION NO. 19-95 - Authorizing a 3-year franchise agreement extension with Wil-Mar Disposal, Inc., for solid waste collection Staff Recommendation: Adopt Brad Whitty provided the staff report and recommendation to approve a three-year CC 02/28/95 Page 8 contract extension with Wil-Mar Disposal, Inc. Public Comments: Tom Walters, Executive Manager of Wil-Mar Disposal, Inc., requested approval. Responding to inquiry from Councilman Johnson, Mr. Walters confirmed that Wil-Mar was carrying Atascadero's solid waste to the Chicago Grade Landfill. I.B. Jenkins, representing Chicago Grade Landfill, requested that Wil-Mar's extension request be continued until negotiations between Wil-Mar and Chicago Grade are completed. David Smith, CPA representing Wil-Mar Disposal, Inc., spoke in support of Wil-Mar's request for contract extension and suggested that Chicago Grade's request for delay is not related to franchise agreement between the City and Wil-Mrar Disposal. ---End of Public Testimony--- MOTION: By Councilman Highland, seconded by Councilman Carden to continue the meeting beyond the hour of 11:00 p.m.; motion unanimously passed. MOTION: By Councilman Highland, seconded by Councilman Carden to adopt Resolution No. 19-95; motion approved 5:0 by roll call. 2. RESOLUTION NO. 18-95 -Appointing an ex-officio youth member and alternate to the Parks & Recreation Commission Council subcommittee recommendation: Adopt The City Clerk reported that the Council sub-committee was recommending that Christina Kays be appointed as the youth representative and Yasmin Jones as the alternate. MOTION: By Councilman Luna, seconded by Councilman Carden to adopt Resolution No. 18-95 as recommended by ';,the Council sub- committee; motion approved unanimously by roll call vote. D. COMMITTEE REPORTS (The following represent ad hoc or standing committees. Informative status reports were given, as follows.): CC 02/28/95 Page 9 1. S.L.O. Council of Governments/S.L.O. Regional Transit Authority - Councilman Carden reported that SLORTA will meet on Wednesday, March 1 st and noted that alternate Councilman Highland would attend. 2. County Water Advisory Board/Nacimiento Water Purveyors Advisory Group - Councilman Highland indicated that the County Water Advisory Board "would be meeting on Wednesday, March 1st and noted that alternate Steve Sylvester would attend in his place. 3. Economic Round Table - Councilman Johnson reported that a resolution revising the structure of the Economic Round Table would be coming before the City Council at the next regular meeting. 4. Highway 41 Realignment Community Advisory Committee -Henry Engen reported that bridge plans are available for review. 5. Air Pollution Control District - Councilman Carden reported on the study session held on February 24, 1995 and announced that the APCD will meet again on March 10, 1995 in San Luis Obispo. 6. Upper Salinas River Coordinated Resource Management and Planning Committee - Councilman Highland reported that the group had met on February 27th to review and comment on the second draft of the Salinas River Basin Management Plan. E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION: 1. City Council Mayor Bewley expressed appreciation to the Fire Chief for implementing a cost recovery policy on emergency response and stand-by for PG&E-related calls. Councilman Johnson commended staff for efforts in getting agendas out and posted. 2. City Manager Andy Takata provided an overview of the next regular agenda and reminded the Council to adjourn to the Mid-Year Budget Review scheduled for March the 2nd. CC 02/28/95 Page 10 F. ADJOURNMENT: THE MEETING WAS ADJOURNED AT 11:12 P.M. THE CITY COUNCIL WILL MEET ON THURSDAY, MARCH 2, 1995 FOR PURPOSES OF THE MID-YEAR BUDGET REVIEW. MINUTES RECORDED AND PREPARED BY: LEE PRICE, City Clerk Attachments: Exhibit A - (Resolution No. 14-95 Exhibit iA) Exhibit B - (Atascadero Homeowners) Exhibit C - (Torgerson) i CC 02/28/95 Page 11 • ti, i s \\\\ Wx \ \ MARCIA MCCLURE TORGERSON 6200 Llano Road Atascadero, CA 93422 805-466-7980 February 28, 1995 Atascadero City Council Atascadero, CA RE: 3-F Meadows Ranch Councilmen: As I expressed in my statement to the Planning Commission, I was impressed with the EIR for 3-F Meadows Ranch and how thorough it was. I was particularly pleased with the inclusion of the "Visual Resources" impact that'i'was addressed in this EIR which has been excluded in prior EIR's. I therefore ''feel that this EIR adequately reviewed all significant environmental impacts. SIn regards to the project itself, I think that the Davis family, David Watson and Paul Reichardt have gone out of their way to create a better neighborhood than was originally designed and has worked with many of the surrounding neighbors to make adjustments that would alleviate their concerns regarding the project. Therein lies the key! Instead of trying to shove their property ''rights down their neighbors throats, they realized the benefits to all concerned of communicating with their neighbors, accepting input from those neighbors, and lincorporating that input into their plans as much as they could. The traffic complaints from some of the residents of Cenegal '. and Laurel seem impossible to mitigate. I get the feeling that some of these residents feel that if you approve this project tonight, tomorrow there will be 400 more cars going by their houses. In reality, it will probably take years for the first phase of this project to be completed before the second phase, which include$ the road leading down to Cenegal, is even constructed. Then, lots will be four sale. This will probably increase traffic by a few cars. Then, if some lots sell, a few might build a house. Only then will you begin to see regular traffic increase on Cenegal and Laurel. Cenegal and Laurel are already designated as Rural Local roads in Atascadero's Circulation Element. This project had nothing ,to do with that designation. These residents should have attended the public hearing for the updated Circulation Element back in April 1993 and expressed '',their concern for their streets' designation then. The fact that this project is nota subdivision but only a re-alignment of existing colony lots, means that this project is not adding (2) any more traffic to those streets than the original lot configuration would have. Therefore, if the Davis family wanted to sell the lots as they exist today, there would be the same amount of traffic impact. Also, the suggestion of a bridge across Graves Creek has one major problem; the bridge would be situated almost directly across Santa Lucia from the entrance gate of the Millhollin Mine. This area of Santa Lucia is already a dangerous situation. If the County of San Luis Obispo, who currently operates the Mine, is allowed to continue with their proposed expansion of their operation there, which includes approximately 30 truck trips per day, this will surely be a deadly combination. Imagine cars trying to pull off the bridge onto Santa Lucia; dump trucks with trailers trying to pull out of the Mine onto Santa Lucia. Add to that the already existing residential traffic on Santa Lucia and the blind curves of Santa Lucia in both directions which restrict reasonable sight distance of oncoming traffic. You can see that this would only make an already dangerous situation that much worse. I hope you will agree that this project is a well thought out endeavor that includes many neighbors' input and support. Sincerely, Marcia l r r G arc a McC ure To ge son /m s . l7AASCADMOHOMEO NWERS SSOCIATION P Q:BQX 322 ATASCADERO CA 93423 February 28, 1995 Mr. Major and other Council members: The Atascadero Homeowners Association has always supported quality residential and commercial development that is consistent with the General Plan Goals. For example, the AHA supported the Downtown Plan, gave its blessing to the Factory Outlet when it chose to build on property already zoned commercial, supported the Lewis Avenue bridge and acquisition of Stadium Park. On February 23, 1995 the General Membership of the Atascadero Homeowners Association voted to support the Davis Family Trust 3-F Meadows 800 acre residential development and commended consultant Dave Watson and the EIR for the project. The 800 acre 3-F Meadows expansion is the largest-ever residential proposal in Atascadero. It was begun six years ago. Since then the Davis Family Trust, working with consultant Dave Watson and SEDES, have made many changes to the existing 1914 E.G. Lewis subdivision. 1. Roads were rerouted, saving many trees. 2. Home sites have been clustered in the more appropriate building areas leaving open space and wildlife corridors to the steeper areas. 3. Fewer homes, not more, have been proposed — from 115 to 111. Probably the outstanding feature of this project has been the willingness of Dave Watson to meet many times with concerned citizens and to conduct a tour of the area for them. He also gave a very comprehensive description to the Homeowners Association, brought maps and answered questions from the audience. The communication between the developer and the public has definitely been two way. There would be less polarization and more community consensus if other residential and commercial development were conducted in a similar manner. The EIR on the 3-F Meadows project is exceptionally good, in our opinion the best we have seen in Atascadero, and the taxpayers were not asked to pay for it. Thanks again to the Davis Family, Mr. Watson and SEDES. Sincer ly, Lindsay Hampton for the Atascadero Homeowners Association I i 1 Agenda Item: A-3 Meeting Date: 03/14/95 ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL MARCH 2, 1995 MINUTES The Mayor called the Special Meeting to order at 7:03 p.m. and led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL: Present: Councilmembers Carden, Highland, Johnson, Luna and Mayor Bewley Absent: None Also Present: Muriel_ "Micki" Korba, City Treasurer and Lee Price, City Clerk Staff Present: Andy Takata, City Manager; Henry Engen, Community Development Director; Art Moniandon, City Attorney; Brady Cherry, Director of Community Services; Brad Whitty, Finance Director; Mike McCain, Fire Chief; Bud McHale, Police Chief and Steve S*Ivester, City Engineer COUNCIL COMMENTS: Councilman Johnson mentioned that he had witnessed a woman being harassed by skateboarders at the Senior Citizen's Center on East Mall. Hie commented that there had also been a news article about a similar incident and suggested that this matter should be discussed at the next City/School Committee meeting. Brady Cherry provided a status report on a local effort to establish a skate park. 1 COMMUNITY FORUM: There was no public testimony. { SPCC 03/02/95 Page 1 I A. MID-YEAR BUDGET REVIEW - Review proposed Resolution No. 21-95, amending the 1994-95 adopted budget Brad Whitty, Finance Director, summarized revenues and expenditures in an informational, study session format. Staff responded to questions from the City Council concerning individual fund balances, particularly the Wastewater & Sewer Facility funds, the Lake Park Pavilion fund, Recreation and Zoo funds, and the Dial-a- Ride fund. Councilman Carden suggested that the City explore regional efforts for combined Dial - a-Ride and emergency services dispatch. The City Manager proposed that a sub- committee of the North County Council meet with members of the staff from the cities of EI Paso de Robles and Atascadero to look at possible options. An update of how the Orange County Investment Pool situation affects the City's finance was provided by the Finance Director and the City Manager apprised the Council of proposals for solution currently being reviewed. City Manager Andy Takata recommended the formation of a citizens' task force to review the City's budget and current revenues, explore revenue enhancement and possibly analyze City service levels. He suggested that membership include two members of the City Council and representation from the business community and various community groups. Public Comments: Rick Scheider, representing the Zoological Society of San Luis Obispo County (Zoo Society), spoke in support of continued funding for the Charles Paddock Zoo. He presented an overview of the many educational programs provided for the public's benefit at the Zoo. In addition, he noted that one-third of the Zoo's staff is provided by volunteers and most of the animal food is donated. Leon Korba, 10905 Santa Ana Road, asked how interest earnings are calculated. The Finance Director responded. Lois Williams, Zoo Society Board Member, also spoke in favor of continued budget support for the Zoo and urged the City Council to ensure that the Zoo's accreditation is maintained. ---End of Public Testimony--- SPCC 03/02/95 Page 2 Staff was directed to come back with options for,forming a citizens' task force on economic recovery at the next regular City Council meeting ',(March 14, 1995). No changes were made to the mid-year budget adjustments as presented by staff. A resolution formally amending the 1994-95 adopted budget to reflect the mid-year adjustments will be presented to the City Council on March 14, 1995 under the Consent Calendar. AT 9:14 P.M., THE SPECIAL MEETING WAS ADJOURNED. THE NEXT MEETING OF THE ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL WILL BE TUESDAY, MARCH 14, 1995 AT 7:00 P.M. MINUTES RECORDED AND PREPARED BY: LEE PRICE, City Clerk SPCC 03/02/95 Page 3 i 1 REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL Meeting Date: 3/14/95 CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item: A-4 Through: Andy Takata, City 'tanager 11 From: Bradford Whitty. Finance Director- SUBJECT: Finance Director ' s report for the month of Jar¢uary 1995 . I RECOMMENDATION: City Council receive this report , review andccept . BACKGROUND: i This is the second presentation of the monthly Finance. Director's report .. The purpose of this Ireport is to communicate a financial "picture as well las facilitate constructive questions and answers on a monthly basis . These reports are another tool to construct where thel City has been li and hopefully provide direction for the Citv'sl fiscal vear . The report is not intended to be all conclusiveand you should expect changes in the format . Any suggestions! are welcomed. DISCUSSION: ` The statements for January represent 53 of the fiscal vear . The first statement compares budget to actual with calculated percentages . Keep in mind that some funds have seasonal fluctuations in their revenues and expenditures thus their calculated percentages may not coincide with; the calendar percentage . The second statement corrects dor the short coming of the first by comparing actual amounis between two fiscal years . Two statements . A revenues less expenditures Ion a year-to- date basis and a miscellaneous accounts recei4bie -have been added to this month 's report . :mother statemebt to be added shortly will show the fund' s revenues and expe; ditures side- by-side with a net effect on the fund ballances . This unaudited statement will help forecast what tie ending fund balance will be for a given fiscal year . Thi- is important to forecast how the audited financial statements may apneas at June 30th because it is tae final record tl the pubiie . investors , and lending institutions . I Next month' s report will reflect the mid-year budget adjustments , { i { The City of Atascadero FINANCIAL REPORT (Unaudited) Seven Months Ended January 31 . 1995 580'0 of the Year BUDGET PERCENT 1994-95 YTD ACTUALS UNREALIZED ACTUAL/BUDGE" REVENUES: General Fund 6. 909 . 690 3, 542 , 513 3 . 367 . 177 51 . 27% Gas Tam 439 ,000 266 , 310 172, 690 60 . 66% Zoo Operations 270, 150 106, 640 163 , 510 39. 47% Dial-A-Ride 474, 713 128 , 520 346, 193 27 .07% Wastewater 1 , 132 , 912 541 , 489 591 , 423 47 .80% Lake Pavilion 41 , 580 21 , 146 20,434 50 .86% Aquatics 39 , 316 10. 024 29 , 292 25 . 500 Recreation 449 ,838 200 . 779 249.059 44.63% Tree Planting Trust 4 , 100 5, 920 ( 1 .320) 144. 38% Sidewalk Trust 2, 500 4 , 604 (2. 104) 184 . 16% Emergency Services i0 , 000 a , 207 5 . 193 = 2 . 071 Police Training 20 ,000 12. 418 7 , 582 62. 09% Weed Abatement 40 , 000 18 . 030 21 ,970 45 . 07% A.D. 43 - Marchant 6 . 900 3 . 233 3 . 662 46. 93% A.D. T4 - Cayucos/Sesparado 921000 50 . 994 41 ,006 55 . 43' A.D. - Chandler 200 172 2S 56.00% A.D. 6 - Camino Real 0 5 . 187 ( 5 . 187 999 .00r i A.D. I-7 - Las Encinas/3-F 0 53 . 407 (53 . 407 ) 9.99 . 00 COP Debi Service 195 . x00 56. 55 139 .042 23 . 33 Capita'. Projects 1 ! -572 - 203 245 1S " 132" ,021 i5 . 60r Police Impact Fees 25 000893 i- . 107 31 . 57 Fire Impact Fees 40 . 000 12 2''0 i7 '30 55 . 6; naris Impact Fees 'S . 000 +4 . 1=1 30 ,559 758 . 35'" DrainagFees Impact ees 65 , 000 21 . 03" 46. 913 31 . 01% Amapoa-Tecorida Fees 40 ,000 11 . 611 25. 359 29 . 03r Public Works 115 . 000 36. 027 75. 973 31 . 33% St . Maint . Districts 5 , i00 1 . 140 3 , 960 1 . 35M TDA/Nan-Transit 45 , 000 2 , 269 42, 732 5 .04% Sewer Facility Capital 5241i00 247 , 093 277 , 007 47 . i5LA Camino Real Construction 90 . 5.15 109 . 293 ( 13 ,443) 120. 31% 1 Las Encinas Construction 21000 551350 (53. 350) -4269 .00% 1 3-F Meadows Construction 0 41 , 473 (41 . 473 ) 999 . 00% 1 Santa Xosa A.D. 0 40 . 319 ( 40. 319 ) 999 . 00% 1 ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- :otai City Revenues 1_ . '30 . 65' 91' . '37 6. 753 ,415 16 . '-':> ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- J The City of Atascadero FINANCIAL REPORT {Unaudited) Seven Months Ended January 31 , 1995 58% of the Year BUDGET PERCENT 1994-95 YTD ACTUALS UNREALIZED ACTUAL/BUDGET -- ----------- ----------- -------------- Esi?ENDITURES . General Fund 61. 908, 891 3 ,394, 388 3 , 014 , 503 56 . 37% Gas Tax 512, 655 255, 152 257 . 503 49 . 770 Zoo Operations 270, 529 139 , 229 1.'.31 . 300 51 :470 Dial-A-Ride 472, 304 178. 598 ?93 . 706 37 . 31'% Wastewater 1 , 112 , 605 494, 515 618 .090 44 . 45% Lake Pavilion 45 , 885 29. 202 16. 683 63 . 640 Aquatics 33, 266 27,090 6 . 1 ;6 51 . 43% Recreation 449. 821 256.619 193 , 202 57. 050 Tree Planting Trust 31 ,800 60 31 . 740 0 . 19% Sidewalk Trust 0 0 0 0 . 00% Emergency Services 12,000 0 12, 000 0 . 00% Police Trainin; 20,000 17, 943 2, 057 39 . 72% Weed Abatement 40,000 1 , 167 381833 2. 920 A.D. ¢3 - .Marchant 8. 304 0 3 . 304 0 . 00° A.D. #4 - Cayucos/Sesparado 99 , 475 74,315 34 . 660 75 . 2111, A.D. T5 - Chandler 42 , 276 42. 276 0 100 . 000 A.D. T6 - Camino Read 0 .36 . 225 (56, 223 ) 999 . 00% i A.D. s7 - Las Encinas/3-F 0 59 . 711 9 . 711 ) 999 . 000, 1 COP Debt Service 193 , 500 191 . 726 6 . 174 96 . 59° pi .ai Projects 1 , ;52 205 302 - 1 1 . 250 .034 i9 . -� =.> ice impact Fees 55 .000 0 55 , 000 O . OG'' Tire impact Fees 165.000 G 165 . 000 0 . 00° Parks Impact Fees 30 .000 0 30 , 000 O . OG°� Drainage impact Fees 135 , 400 0 135 . 400 0 . 00111: Amapoa-Tecorida Fees 12 , 500 976 "11 . 524 Puoiic Works II" . "'3? 1 ,382 1i5 . 550 1 . 60": St . Maint . Districts 30,000 0 30 ,000 X3 . 00'" TDA/Non-Transit 180 . 368 18 . 722 161 , 646 I0 . 33" Server Facility Capital 1 , 400. 500 229 , 409 1 . 171 , 091 16 . 350' Camino Real Construction 455,000 103 . 602 351 . 398 22 . '7`:: Las Encinas Construction 135 , 000 69 . 935 65 .062 Si . 31` 3-F Meadows Construction '0, 000 2. 422 67 . 573 3 . 46°: Santa Rosa A.D. 0 0 0 0 . 00`', - --- Total City Expenditures 14, 597 , 019 6, 477 , 844 8 , 119 . 1-15 ,S°' TOTAL NET REVENUE/(EXPEND. ) ( 1 , 366, 367) ( 530 , 6071 ) { 1 , 3:15 760 ) ?3 . 43'' The Notes are an integral part of this statement . .l The City of Atascadero FINANCIAL REPORT (Unaudited ) Seven Months Ended January 31 . 1995 58% of the Year January 94 January 95 YTD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL S CHANGE ------ ----------- ----------- REVENUES : General Fund 3 . 209 . 546 3 . 542 . 513 332. 967 Gas Tax 257 . 008 266. 310 9 . 302 Zoo Operations 102. 232 106. 640 4 . 408 Dial-A-Ride 119. 309 128 . 520 9 . 211 Wastewater 895.000 541 .489 ( 353 , 510 ) Lake Pavilion 17 , 189 21 . 146 3 .957 Aquatics 12 . 101 10.024 ( 2.077 ) Recreation 219 , 317 200. 779 ( 18 . 538 ) Tree Planting Trust 3 .008 5.920 2.912 Sidewalk Trust 1 . 745 4. 604 2 .859 Emergency Services 1 . 579 4. 207 2 . 628 Police Training 3 . 311 12. 418 9 . 107 Weed Abatement 23 . 933 18 . 030 ( 5 . 903 ) A.D . #3 - Marchant 3 . 845 3 . 238 ( 607 ) A.D. n4 - Cayucos/Sesparado 15 . 382 50. 994 5 , 612 A.D. -5 - Chandler 14. 531 172 ( 14 . 3591 A.D. 76 - Camino Real 168 . 000 5 . 18" ( 162. 813) A.D . = ' - Las Encinas/3-F 3 . 420 53 . +0? 49 . 987 COP Debt Service 98 .352 56. 158 (42 . 19 Capital Projects 69 . 950 Police impact Fees 1 . 194 " . 893 ( 2 301 ) impact Fees 28 . 306 ( 6. 037 ) Pa...s Impact Fees 44 . 66" 14 . 141 ( 5 26 ) Drainage impact Fees 3 ;. 336 21 . OS" 06 . 249 ) .mama-Tecorida Fees 21 . 501 11 .611 )9 _. 390) St . .faint . Districts 14. 531 1 . 140 ( 43 . 391 ) TDA/Non-transit 12 .054 2 269 (9 , 735 ) Server Facility Capital 0 247 .093 247 . 093 Camino Real Construction 1 . 790. 441 109. 293 ( 1 . 681 . 148 ) 3 Las Encinas Construction 616. 447 85 . 380 ( 531 .067 ) 1 3-F Meadows Construction 373 . 595 41 . 4-3 ( 332 . 122 ) 1 Santa Rosa A.D. 0 40 . 319 40 . 319 ----------- ----------- ----------- _otai City Revenues 8. 306, 603 5. 9=17 . 237 ( 2 . 359 . 371 ) ----------- ----------- ----------- The Votes are an intesrai hart of this statement . .1 The City of Atascade.ro FINANCIAL REPORT (Unaudited ) Seven Months Ended January 31 , 1995 Is 53% of the Year January 94 January 95 YTD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL S CHANGE ----------- ----------- ----------- EYPENTD I TURES : General Fund 3 . 550 ,082 3 , 394, 358 344 , 306 5 Gas Tax 203 , 375 25.1 . 152 46. 777 Zoo Operations 141 , 513 139 . 229 ( 2 . 234 ) Dia!-A-Ride 244,463 173 . 598 (65 .370) Wastewater 334 . 331 494. 515 ( 344 . 317 ) 2 Lase Pavilion 32 . 762 29 . 202 ( 3 . 560 ) Aquatics 27. 939 27 , 090 (349 ) Recreation 235. 866 256, 61920, 754 Tree Planting Trust 2, 257 60 Sidewalk Trust 0 0 0 Emergency Services 0 0 0 Police Training 5, 547 17 , 943 9 . 396 Weed Abatement 221630 1 . 167 ( 21 . 463 ) A.D. i3 - Marchant 0 0 0 A.D. #4 - Cayucos/Sesparado 80. 721 74. 815 (5 . 907 ) A.D. -75 - -Chandler 36. 945 -12- 276 5 331 A.D. 1"76 - Camino Real 36, 380 86. 223 49 , 345 3 A.D. 07 - Las Encinas/3-F 12 . 411 59. 711 300 a COP Debt Service 162, 489 1911. 726 Capita: Projects 150. 649 302 - 174 151 - 5-16 I* ice Impact Fees =7 . 500 0 ( ..7 , 500 ) ..$- Impact Fees 1 . 500 0 ( 1 . 5001 Parrs impact Fees e lS , UUO 0 ( 1-5 - 000 )Draina e Impact Fees 664 0 (. 664 : Amapoa-Tecorida Fees 0 976 9-6 P:, l is Works 19 . 598 1 . 332 ( 17 716 ) St . '.faint . Districts 0 0 G 354 _ 3 s IDA/Non-Transit _",0 iS'. '"'2 � ( . 2 36 ) Serer Facility Capita! 0229 . 409 229 . 409 Camino Real Construction 705 .079 103 - 602 ( 601 . 4-311 3 Las Encinas Construction "1105; 69 . 933 ( 1 . 149 ) 4 3-F Meadows Construction 64. 906 2 , 422 (62 . 4S4 ) 4 Santa Rosa A.D. 0 0 0 ` Total City Expenditures 6. 149 . 658 6 .. 477 . 344 ( 2771 , 81: ) TOTAL NET CHANGE AMOUNT 1 . 5561950 ( 530. 607 ) 057 557 ) The -Notes are an inte-rai part of this statement . i .f he cit`' of Atascadero FINANCIAL REPORT (Unaudited ) Seven Months Ended :1anuary 31 . 190- 58% or the Year REVENUES EXPENDITURES INCOME.' YTD ACTUALS YTD ACTUALS (LOSS) Fund ``37._`� . L G,.,n e r a.•� 1� S42 C 13 3 ,894 ,388 � �J. i .37S .i �,;e . Gas Tax 266,310 2.Sc1S2 .11 . 157 Zoo Operations 106.640 139,229 02 .590 Dial -A-Ride 125,520 178,59S (50.079 ) Wastewater 541 ,489 49401S 46.975 Lake Pavilion 21 . 146 29,202 0.0%) Aquatics 10,024 27,090 (17,066 ) Recreation 200,779 256,619 (SS,840) Tree Planting Trust 5,920 60 5,360 Sidewalk Trust 4,604 O 4,604 Emergency Services 4,207 0 4 :207 Police Training 12. 418 17, 94 i5. 525t Weed Abatement 18.030 1 , 167 16 , 863 A. D. a#.M - Marchant 3.233 0 3 ,21a A.D , #4 " , ay'uccs,'Ses araco 30099d 74,315 O.:a iii 1 ) A.D. #5 .' '.�h handler 17x, 42.276 (42. 104) • A.D . Mb - Ca:\1 11 w.t c Real 5, 187 Sm .8 (31 ,04K A.D . r#7 Las nc' n s 3-F= A M759 . 711, (6 . 30Z ', Capital orojecrc . _ 5 , 7 302 , 174 (56 .9S7 - •Police impact Fees 0 7 ,897. 0 22. 20 Fire impact Fees 270 Parks impact Fees s 44, 14.. ij` AX11a;. oaf'Teco r ida Fees 11 .611 976 LO , 635 Public Works Z6,027 1 , S2 34, 145 i 1 , . , ..�- r,/.�.i :- Districts 1- {{��..�.= 1 /.l,.f�. it 1'.•�i MJ iw w 1 1 U A�1 V. ✓�✓I.r 1 l t.+4.J '� ' TDA/Non-Transit 2 ,269 1S, 722 C16. 5d Sewer Facility Capital ,_!17 .093 22q .401 17 .62-d Camino 'Real Construction 10q, 293 10Z,602 5.691. Las E cinas Construction 85 so 9�6 938 15 , 442 3-F Meadows Construction 41. ~47' 2,422 39,051' h Santa Rosa A .D . 40.31 0 40 . 319 --------- 0 .• .119 ISI The Notas are an integral parr of this st aremeni. . X FINANCIAL REPORT (Unaudited) As of january 31. 199,55 Current Past Due Totals accounts Receivable: $ [ !� Business License Fees $4.4170 1 $5 560 ,9h0 Booking Fees 1,090 2215 3.904 Alarm Billings 1,04 4.163 5,266 D.U.I. Wilings 2,075 0 2,075 MAC. incCilected WKS 0 27,60 27 .64,3 ------------ Suo-total 18.668 36,179 144,Q8 . .._ .._,._.z are .,n - . _ . 7his • The City of Atascadero Notes to the Financial Report Seven Months Ended January 31 .1995 58". of the Year (Unaudited) NOTES: 1 . The Assessment Districts will be adjusted and reflect their appropriate budgeted amounts on the next report . 3 . a portion of wastewater revenues are now being recognized in the Sewer Facilities Capital Fund, a fund established in the previous fiscal year . 3 . The proceeds from the sale of bonds were received in the previous fiscal year . Thus the revenues and expenditures are substantially different as compared to the present fiscal year . 4 . The proceeds from the sale of bonds were received in the previous fiscal year. Also received are the State SLTPP monies in this fiscal year . 5 . Several factors have contributed to the increased expenditures as compared to the previous rear . First , the City's liability insurance has increased. Second . the City has incurred costs associated with the Hwy. 41 fire and the January floods . Some operating costs have increased as was shown in- the mid-year review. 3 REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL Meet i4 Date: 03/14/95 CITY OF ATASCADERO Agendo Item: A-5 Through : Andy Takata, City Manager From: Bradford Whitty, Finance Director SUBJECT: Payment of Audited Bilis and Payroll for the montfh of February, 1995 . RECOMMENDATION: i Approve certified City accounts payable , payroll andpayroli vendor checks for the month of February, 1995 . Attached , for City Council review and approval , arethe following : i A . Payroll Period End 02/03/95 Ck . #19847-19993 $1131 , 930 . 49 Period End 02/17/95 Ck . #20020-20158 1128, 591 . 73 B . Special Payroll Dated 02/09/95 Ck . #19997 35 . 95 Dated 02/24/95 Ck . #20179-20181 2 ,485 . 99 1 C . Payroll Vendors Dated 02/10/95 Ck . #19163-19168 37 , 326 . 01 Dated 02/09/95 Ck . #20001 -20017 ; 64, 793 . 51 Dated 02/23/95 Ck . #20161 -20176 64 , 401 . 27 Dated 02/24/95 Ck . #20184-20187 707 . 87 D . Accounts Payable Ck . #47973-49477 1181 , 507 . 06 The undersigned certifies that the attached dema ds have been released for payment in the total amount of $611 , 79 .88 and have been reviewed in conformity with the budget of! the Cite of Atascadero and that funds are available for these demands . Dated : BRADFORD WFfITTY, Finan0 Dire or I Approved by the Cary Council at a meeting held LEE PRICE , City Clerk, i Q 0 w)101 'i 1 i O a.H a) :4�4�4 A4:C a4:,4 a4>4 A4 a4:L�4>4 J4:�4:4:44 a4:L:.4'a4:4 A4 A4:�4 X>4 a4:4>4 J4 J4:.4 44 A4�4:4 54:.4 �4 O U H I F F— U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U O? ¢ 1 7n F�--Ax\WWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW.W WWWWW a 1 u 5 3 1n o x U U U U U U U U U v U U U v U v U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U v U U v U U u I U O &0 n W w - 1 \Am: •w�IOQQAAAQQAAE-AQAQAQQAQAQAQAAQAQAQQQQQQAAQAQGA c� a Iww ¢ma--AwwwwwwwwwzwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwWwwwwwwwwwwww QAH clam OFHFFFFHFFWFFFFHFFFHFHFHFFFFHFFFFHFE-FFFFFFF a•1U o 1 v)AOo4Q o4 ¢Q ¢¢Q ¢ QQQ ¢ ¢Q¢¢¢¢ ¢Q¢Q ¢ Q ¢ ¢ ¢¢¢¢Q¢ ¢ Q¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢¢¢ ¢ 1 In ZOzt4 xxxa4a4a4a4xx> a xaxaxlxo4xxxxaaaxaxxxaxaaaxxaxxxa •� 1 �-•How.¢o •wwwwwwwww ¢wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww (1. 1 oa5 W4 "zzzzzzzf zwzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzZZZZZZZzzzzzz •.. IHz3z wwwwwwwwwaWwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww � I z\\o_awac�c�c�c�c�7�c� c�c�wc�c�c�c�c�c�c�c�c�c�c�c�c�c�c�c�c�c�c�c�c7c�c�c�c�c�c�c�c�c�c�c� viiUUF�z�UUUUUUUUUOUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU a�cxi9cw.> E-o¢aa¢aa¢¢¢�4a¢¢a6aaa¢¢¢aa¢¢ae¢c¢¢¢a¢as¢¢ad¢¢ , ofa.QA.-1OWE-OOO.OOCOOOQOOOOOOO0000000000000000000000000 a) 10— -0>M --E-E-HHE-FHHF—FF-E-HE-E-HHFFFE-�HFHFFFFHFHHHFFFFFFFF c I H O O w z A A a A a Q Q.:I Q Q 5 o::)O Q 3 5 O Q 5 Q 5 A a A Q A A Q A✓A 5 5 a a 5 A A 5 Q Q a Q C 1 to>> «.7nF- ¢¢ QQQ¢6¢ Q> ¢ ¢¢ ¢ ¢¢¢¢Q6¢¢ Q¢ ¢ ¢Q¢Q¢QQ¢¢ ¢ ¢ Q ¢Qd¢ ¢ a+ 1 I 1 c 1 0 0 0 O d-0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OC O 1n N N 00 0 v1 h 0 0 00 O0 0 •-0 0 0 0 0 00007'1 d'00 0 N O O 1D c10 0 3 1 0000 -+0000000"0/"1���ar rlOO�rc^.00Nv7�0 cFOO�O v70o00 d'OOOOOrQ��00 G ! . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E 1 v,o d'o vl to v: d'd'a,It .•.1"10 V>O Vo0 00••-010"0011'1/'717 d'OC ln��O�O•--a0 v10 ¢ "t-00 /"')10.-. a+; !n.r d'10•-•d'01 !n d'N O N N.-�O r 1 •-• t N N 10 N u 1 O •-•.+ W 10 Y 1 zl cl00000000000000000000000000000G0000000000000000000 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 O.O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E I ¢ I 1 U 1 � I G G I G (U fK 1 I 1 1 I G 0 0 0 d'0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OC O!n N N 00 0�h 0 0 tb 0 0 0 O O O C O 00 001'1 V 0 0 017 0 010010 O m 10000 0000000"01•'1 %Or-cno0..h N100Nv 1G d OO 0lnO b0d 000110ra d 00 .+ 1 C C 01 c 1 InO d•Olrs v-,v1 �dO+d'•-�X1'10 K+O V 00 •00 010"001 M 1'11'1 ct 00 1n 1O'd'O�G'+cc v'+0 L y v, v; 1 1'1 d'r1 00 --�N N 00 d'a1 10 W d O�•+ d'•--�(K` !h 10.-� O a) Ec 00 I ---d 1* 1h 17 d' O N C N U ¢ 1 N 7 I C L Q �...Q ., m lE, 1 ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢Q ¢ ¢ 6 ¢ ¢ ¢ 6Q¢¢ ¢ ¢ ¢¢ 6¢ 6 ¢ ¢ 6 ¢6¢ ¢¢¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ 6 ¢ ¢¢¢¢ ¢ G N G Q F I T cr G LCl- 1 ^ z I o z F z ^ 1 a. In&0!n—0 Q^ rn _ w > >U U H x w Q ¢^O^U a I w al w 7n v) H¢ OF 0 U x �xzx < «. 1 a O c >WH � ¢ m U^ C I W Z 0 0 4 G4 3 W -1rn 04•-•2 W k.^ G 1 W k.a cn a0FE-W 330 A F A ¢W ^¢ wt� �Cln G1F E 1 H ¢-- -� ^.a�--a�cn a wa z - xuz ad -:1 U D3W^ zw I ^¢WZ.O A 001- < < WW— •-•.-• ¢ w U) U-0 0 -W.aQw0 ¢a 1 0E-E- -Z zU ¢ x W z Q Ink 0 A Z z¢ 7n 4.E- a. ¢z0 aF I z1n ¢ 3-F- Q w E- x0 11- ¢ �- Q I .-. E-Wa4^z t�H:�4«-+Wtz0Br940 wz0 F ¢z^1n,.ave ^¢F^ OFFFNc4 WO I E-1r-mw0En ¢ Z ¢UZ¢ QIl-,0E-v. ZQf wa.•z�•U•.•,-.z•,a ¢ v)0 D Q 1 z Aln a >O ¢ — -I ¢ OH 14at3a¢U W ¢ ¢tAw^¢c4 I <RnC4w 3 ¢U1nlnwZLL.Q0 000 0 wu)wa za !-- 0<00 ¢za4W 1 Oi- - ME-OL+ 0Uz ^ -• Q W a aaa a UHz¢ <W<W—wa ¢—UU.-Im<0E- I Uo4Zo1 AO HX¢Zzz vnHW www w^ - W WUWaW3HW WZ ¢ w ¢ 7u 1 U¢a—zo 4:x ¢00 4^ ¢A QAA QH(- <w am ¢x a+o4aarL .a -:10 E I ¢HO ¢04>- z UWMW W—Q ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ m zA w -H ¢ -O ¢ ¢0414U0 ct 1 wa.OX F O�-z-04W¢zUU UUU U4' x >- ¢W¢>-zWW 4.4.WC4 ¢z ¢z z I wrL +a Hzz < <Wwwm>�ow U)0w 0 OFQwXzvZz 41 -1 - -+HHazzU¢ I a U.aZxx - HtiawAQ<.- 7w < ¢¢ ¢ ¢HE-wzw0¢H¢aaa aazz¢¢W�-w I ¢w¢W—o0 U 1 a Ez zaaWH HFF F Aw —W -+—wwAQQ ¢ ¢w W xxxx a a>: I --------------------------------- --- — •-••---- - - ----UUUUUUUUU I `..._.���....�v�......��.......-��...v.�v... ._.....—.•..-.—...--..�v..�..i.,.�...v.�v v..-�...�.� vim...—..� N I v v G I Nv1�N .-+.--c`. ••-.,,,mN.-.17.-. 1000 a1 7"h-It CI- Nom.(2 cnN CD 001 �N•--...N ca � Ioon000vgAAQ000000cOooA000gN0000000 oo00 -It 0 -oCD 0 G c 1 a.UamaAz«- .. — -.F ¢� wQA¢av1 ¢ - ¢¢ ¢ ¢HH�zaO1n¢oo4aa .a -7zz ¢ ¢w +w Y I ¢w<mn 0 ¢o 0000 " xzzwwrnE-0E-FFO E-FO ¢W W --.--a 1x0¢ ¢0 ¢¢W W xxxxa O C L•: a`c�a 01 c1 a�a1 c1 m O1 a1 a1 c1 a1 c1 m m a1 01 m a1 a1 a1 O1 a1 01 m a1 01 m m O a1 m c1 a1 c1 01 c1 m c1 a1 a1 a1 a1 O c1 a`.01 Y -+ I r v�•-�o O o r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r h r r r r r r r r r r I N N N N N N N N N N N 1 V c V N N N N N"."N.N N NCV N N N N N N N N"1 V N N N N N N.N N N"N v.1n Z I G 0 0 0 0 c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.O O O O O o 0 0 0 G 0 0 0 0 G 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o• rn \\ c 10�D1n 10r W a10--N 1^. -qt.n larr00 c10�N1'1 V'v11D r00 c10 ..N1•'!d'ln 1O t-W a10--N 1'1 d In 10 r 7b a\ 00 4. .L c) 1 r ��^1'1r1r1r11+1d'C,4 d'� 7 r t r t 7.nlnlnlnvlvlvlvl.nv1101D1D1D1010101G1Dwrrrrrrrrrr \\ Ki UA 1 a`•a1••.c`l NNNNNNNNNNNN N N N NNN N N N N N N'N NN NNN N/`7 N N"NNN N1`1NNNNN r In r- a) E 1 r00 ma me mmrnmmmma rnMMO)CI rnrno rnrnrnrnrnrnrnrna rnrnrnrno rnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrn O O to L 7 1 d'd'd•d• d• d d d'd' d'd'd' d'd' �t d' d•d' -It d-* d' -It 7 -It d' 't C- f d•.d'd• d-d'd'It d•d'd•d-d' d' -T t a 7 a 7 U z I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c O 0 C.0 0 0 0 0 0 c O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F r. •C 1 .n OC •.� O I rn I I 0.z c 4 I N WI7 7 0 1 0 alta a. I p '000002 N Q ¢ 1 X M:4:�4:+4 X X Y:,4 a4�4 a4:+4:,4 X:,4 a4 J4:4�4 X>4 a4 A4>4:,4 X:+4 a4:,4:,4:,4:4 a4 X J4 L4:4 X a4%4'....,.44:<JL D4 A4>4>4 a4 o U H I U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U9;IU U U U U U U U fL I x x x x x x x x x x x xxxx x x====x xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx":'.xxxxxx:>; x I U U u U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U V U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U'...;U U U U U U U U Cq Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q g Q Q Q Q A Q Q A A Q Q Q Q Q A Q Q Q Q Q a Q Q Q'!Q g Q Q Q A A Q I W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W WW W W W W W W W c1FFFHHHHHHHHHHHHHHFFHHHHHHHHFHFHHHHHHHHFHHdHHFHHHFH 0 1 ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢¢ ¢ ¢ ¢¢¢ ¢¢ ¢ ¢ ¢¢¢¢ ¢< .,4< .< ¢¢ ¢ ¢¢¢¢¢¢ ¢ ¢¢ ¢ ¢ ¢II¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢04 6 ¢ 1 aaaaa0404aaaaaa04xaax04 o4aaao4aaa04aaaaaaaaaaxa a;aaaaaaaa alzzzzzzzzzzzzW Wzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz H i w w wcw7cW7w co 44 w 7wc9w w w wcW7w W w w w w w w w wcW7cw7cw7W W W W WvW W W W w'w W W W W W W W u 1 mIUUUUUUU_U_U__UUUUUUUUU_U_UUU_UU__UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU:!:UUUUUUUU A I E-HFE-FE-F(-.E-Ff-HE-FE-FFFE-FFE- FE HFHFHHHHFFHHHHHHFHHFFHIHHHEFHHHH u I 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000o00000 u1FFHFFHHFHFHHHE•FFFHHFHFFHFHHHFHHFHFFHFHHFF3FHFHHFFE t 1 0DZ)D 7. SgOAQA.'X55.D ). .'DA`"..aQ=J.'DSQQa�aaoo:DDDDoaoa,:.D�D Z)DD � c 1 NOr 0000000-+�DOO�DO O��O�OOOIDOOOv700o0000N00� --�Ov�.;•-+0�000OInO 7 I HOMO d. . . . . .10N0 . . . . .v. . . . . . . . .MO . . . .01D_•+O OONOt�+DM . . . . �1. E I N1n 010 Nin'nMOONNOOMNc�a0 M10010 t`t�d'0000010 d' N d'OOM1� Oi1� to00—M0 ¢ I Nt�M O•-•10 M001� MN N.--, 1D 0l-010"M000000�n.'H 1D 0041 W) N01 M—M d'N Q�MNNN N ati 1 ^- M N N N.-+ O 10 41 a1 M— .--,N.-+W t- 10 N a1 .-+ M N 1 ^ z1 I a.+ I cl0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 k0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E 1 ¢ 1 I U 1 G Q I a (U a 1 I N 0 r o 0 0 0 o O O O 10 O m O a 0 0010 0 0 01n 0 0 00 0 0 0 N(D O t '+O 1)0 �/•' 1 tV OMpd'o000 o1G N00 --�O 000 v)Np0001000M001�OM010000^.NOt� bM0 d'N OIC 1D a I O c h c I N v,a1 p N 41 41 M O O N N O O M o0 M 10 O 10 1-l-d'0 O o w 10,* In d'0 0 M r- O h d'0 N D 1 N[-N 0.--.10 M to 1-m"C4 0[--0'0 41 M W W 00 to -.10 00 v, " "M(n.. m •C N 0 0 1 M N N N .--, off-, vl M M.--i--N•--�M r 1G N.-+ O N .-,M .-, M N rrm G �N C7 ¢ I ^ U a o I 1/ 7 1 d vr , . G • to 1 4) F I ¢¢¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢¢ ¢¢ ¢¢¢¢ ¢¢¢¢¢¢ ¢¢¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢¢ ¢ ¢ 1Q¢ ¢ ¢¢¢ ¢ ¢ cc m G Q H 1 U � W C 1 ¢ U U Z a ^ W .-• z W F � a.. 1 a ¢ 1 v¢ 6.. Fa w^aW. �^ °' ¢ > z ' w OA _ a a H ^ U o 0 z U � Ht7xOr¢n - z¢Z Z a a U O ¢W c I arnE- W " <Zv)U V) z M < W uu) 3 --�a Q w a04U)i — NZ z av ¢ xUw a zwFz^ .. mo¢ Vnw0 z 3 .764 ¢ a> 1 ¢ ,--,W ..¢ fn.-+f0 z <u) a oa.]^V)0U ^a O I F > W WZG ¢ ZW F uw� •WCC v; W Z1 �3W>L v) E-$ �W--• i z to a ,.a z a W E a4> 0^ Z U W u)^A H a�-••-�W.a V1 z U F �1^N to 1 a ¢ wAH E- f zwU¢ 0za¢>z0 M •aw ozEo v> FO a a.WE-Wz ¢�¢ I LIU �F-aGa, • .jOQ AOwaw aXwU¢> aHC ZP.. w z—a-�¢ W <W a�-+-�wZW ^ZH¢1EFA a.OE- Z?r w0c/Do a .-CDw.aCl. Oxzz54wQoo I ^� >• ¢aUrq¢ ¢O' xw•.a � ¢ Qu)«.gOAxQaa2l ¢ ¢A¢ x ..':. a ¢3v)...�-z wz a P.awHO -x ¢W^H� - aA aoHCw -WZ .-, ¢ a > v) O u..a-H a m xxa¢ E I ZU Z.-) ZF ¢ - • ¢ awa ¢ «. E- W ¢W z .a�.W zz w w a.p A ¢zo -mz Z i <wmuo) xoc0 ¢v wNahuWOFW Wa ? FFaUaaW W:,4 Q cw. 0( 4U ¢ w a¢i)� ¢x A4a 0�7a -- 1 ^H ¢ Xzo4r�n�wa~w> oUaax Aav:o U �> a 0 ¢aa f Z-14 � H��awW 1 fEo00oaa •A ¢aw¢wwww. oA¢ ¢W am ¢oc7o O aw¢W W W gE-O¢- —Z> 1 UUVUUzv) UVUUQw �Qc�QQHQUawwc�wwa au u - w -wrn�r,0^OPOaa4> ¢•-.w 1 --- -- __ G I �..-r OC.-..r N ...-.N.� .-i O N cF 10.-.N d-.-r.-.N.--,v7.--,41•-- .-.N .-, .--,d' .-..-+ ..w..-i.-. C 1 O�Qx Z O O o 0 0 0 0 N O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A O g 0 0 0 0 0 A O P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 •- N I �z000aa4ww r¢DQ<QQ¢W W W,.,0066Aa� ¢w00000W40¢4WW W 0W WF¢¢W0ZZ a > I UUUUUUUUUUUQAQQQQQQAQawwwww4. a.w>G.>wf,4,o 0> 0 00xxxx�« C> c v I N VN N V1 V7 N V1�n V7 41 N V,V)V)V1 Vi h ur V1 h h N V7 V7 V.V7 41 V)41 N 47...V7 h V1 N to N 41 N N H N 41 W-. Y 1 O+a1 01 01 01 01 al 01 a%01 a\m m 01 01 a1 01 01 01 O1 a\01 01 01 a1 01 a�m a1 a%m 01 mIT 01 01 01 m 01 01 01 qr%O1 0\01 01 01 01 cy, --- -- - - -- -- ---- ------ ------ -- -- ----- -- ----- ------ u -- - - -- -- --- ----- ----- -- ----- -- - - ------U A I \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\ O I NNNNN NNNN N.N N N N N.N N N N N N N N N N NN N NNN NNNNNNNN(!-1NN NNNNN 41 4 x I o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 o o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 \\ c G H I O.-.NM-It v7101-00 M .--,NM d N�[�W ai0 .-.NM V NkD1`00 0%010w.N 00 �. Y W I w00w 0000 w w w 00010.01M ON M 0)SON M000000h W 010 M V In 1D t-W 00 0 0 ^+ N NN NN N N MNtN \\ oS u.0 1 N N N N N N N N N.N N N N N N N N N N M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M<h M M M M M M M 0 E 1 a•.01 m a1 a\a1 a1 01 m 01 01 01 m 01 a1 01 m 01 01 01 Oi 0�O�01 01 a\01 01 01 0�01 a\01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0\01 01 m 01 T 01 m m 00 Cl) t 7 1 •S d- It S d'd• d' t d'd-Y'd'•cf d'7 V d' •Y7 d'd' d'd• d-<{cl- gf at d' lad' d' H• U Z I o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 I cl.. c I 1 G Z C 4 I N w 7 N I J a :4 a C I 000003 M Q ¢ 1 :L:4:L J4:,4 �4 A4>4?4 A4 A4 X?4 a4 X Y X �4 a4:,4 a4:L�4.+4 u,a4 a4 J4 u4 X u X u 44 M b4 a4 a4 A4 A4>4 a4 aL:4 :�4 A4 J4 94:.4 out- IUUUUUUUUUUUUUUODUUQUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUvcJUUUUUUU o>-¢ Iwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww W I x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x I U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U w ac I g A Q A A q Q q q A q A A Q Q Q Q A Q A A Q Q Q Q Q A Q Q Q Q Q q Q q Q A C,A Q Q A Q Q Q Q q Q A 0' C 1 W W W W W W W W W W W W W W WWW W W W W W W W k7 W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W ¢A F c I F F H F H H H F H H F F F F F F F F H H F H H F H F F H F H F F F F F F F H H F F H F F H H F F E- 1 I C4 C4 C4 a w 0404 C4 wlY.0404 t1'040.'w w w aC4 C1'.Ix w w wa w w a 04%04 c4 C4 N.C4 C404 ce C4 W 04 W W W 04 as C. f Z Z Z z z z z z Z Z z z z z z z z z z z z Z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z Z z z z z z z z t. 1 C�Ci0007 t7(.DC7 CSU' C7 C�(7(.�C7 C7 C7 (.7(.7C7C7C7C71.70C�C�C7 C5(:J OC�C�C�C7 UC�(�C�C�C7000 C7 C�(7(.7(.� u) :1 N I U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U QIFHFFHHE�HFHFFFHHHHFHHHHHHHHHFHFHHFHFHHHHHFHFFHE-FHE-H UIo0o0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 d 1 HFHHFHHHH(-H(-FE-E-E-FFFHHHE-FFFHHHHHHHHHHE-FFHHHHHHPf-k-PFFHFFH claaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Y 1 G I 00•--�O O N N rn p 0 p'+O t a\h O O rn O O O(O M N O O h-+00 x 0 0 0 Ovf N t 0 01 N O�O 00 O O 1 0 OOW .O. . .Mt WO .Q`•-. . . . .01 V•1 .1O tt00 .-'. . . . . . . .•-�tW W W WONOIn0W E 1 W�nOONrn.-+r d �O•-+o0d r--.0000[�OMNv)M Op 0000M O • 1O 0C•-•O v; tn*0'�t 6 1 W M7n tr .•+•-.NMO�OO�O O�nMdNOh00 C4 - m --stn MN tWO wr kO.-+C> wNN'?d f .•-i 00 M h d •-+N.-r M N a% d d M M .-.O,•-• r zl I I c f 0 0 o O 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 a O O 0 O o O O O 0 0 0 O O O O O O o O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O 0 0 0 O 0 O o O O O O O ofE I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¢ 1 U i u N I C. 1 G Q f 92. U C4 f 1 o0-.O o NIn 01000-•0d O'v'IO ov1 In 00 o'O M(V C.C,to oO 1h 0 0 0 o v.N d0m 01D O0em- 0 V, 100 W CDMMNM d 000-- W0•.-•1D t a C)ID lO ddp 000•-+00 w000p^d w w c000ON Oen OW a+ -r_C I I W�:O O N O;.-.r d O-+W 7 r.�O O W r O M N v'1 M W W O O M - •O - •M.-��O W O�n O N v'1 O d [.. Cl v: to 7 f WMv:tr -..--.NM O�W�O Oma':Md N Oen 00N•-- m -+V'.MNtcc•-+ O Wr 10•--�ONd W NNtt 117 E T. 0 0 1 .-+W M In d •-•N.-+M -.N m d It M a\ -0,--- v N I t� E I .-. r r a. N u � 1 Z.0 L Vi G �..Q.. ai (E. i ¢¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢¢ ¢ ¢¢ ¢¢ ¢6 ¢¢¢¢ ¢¢ ¢ ¢¢ ¢¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ 6¢ ¢¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢¢ ¢ co O A F I A d G -U N cc i C f W U ^ ? z W z w as - ., 1 U w a. -.a z W 04 Ew-• >> 1 Q> - 1 V.4 E- w > .30Z)-- z °x c4 -mow v w-- zHa z c 1 E w Cl) �- a a: va O W W^^ >' w U>- W ¢-. G G 1 v Z F O W a co >- Wv1F > G a C/) z ¢ us 1 .. 0 ..rn U ¢ W Wx>.¢ FW--zWw --Ia W w J4¢ -�X04 wWOL. z 1 ZWU-- >+W ¢ w xwwm ¢z 7n«-, ¢o as ¢. U0 UwW- - I --�W -] W W Cd I U F ¢ U -�-4 0-a a. a.X Q -] a m 0 w G W;;-—M 1 Q•-• �!W ..a0 H a--aHc E-C4 .-• xUZ00—:D- z CD 040 woo woo 1 W A -aF^ --Z woo->--O—zu"w Qcn ¢ FU Q(�• Uowzzw 1 ¢ ZZ .- cn>• zoo W F[:.z W ZWZa¢04 >•>4.4 W _ _ i tivaM�G .-] C4 wzU-" O -+ <w 0 m x W FFF ¢..aE W E-w w>•-->W W::)%m>- C7o^Z--. >• xZ -Xra¢vnx Qwzz300 ¢ a2.4W Wx Z ¢ X ¢ i zm aHx.-aHa ¢vzaaCn.-. aoWw ¢aazox 0 ¢04a> 0w3w Wati c4UU ¢w'wmw WOOOWH 0M < <Z¢z3� d 1 v�A3^ q ¢ZX ¢3 -- ZZW E- ¢¢z zr..000Q u U U3oW0 -•a •rozaE E 1 1:)r4 F F a > MO ¢--GOOF W zz -a O 0E-F- • . C4 C14 a W M< ¢ cC I cow W c4c4N xx wr+ w fr.a >-HUF 1 x7n - Z I ¢CL3z ¢Wow Qzr z Inti W�-+.�-.-..-.H �4AFHF ¢..�--� W 0ZFZ ¢ ...7ZO. .� - 1 37n ¢ MMZMZZx>•(� wwv)zHF>XUZcti0 WOE-U U Ua4 W ZF--Ixa-•WQ.7 1 ¢ ¢ ¢>-W 000 ¢(-W Qx 1 OOa ¢>•0¢Ixw --. ¢6 ¢W .-.•-.00OZa6 ¢ 1 wwul Cl) acw E- xzz0zzazzz•- 004 - -n - - -a a.a. I0.a.a CLC4WW 3 ---------------------------------------------- G 1 -•.-.M .�.--�.-..--.N d N N M M -.N.-. .-.10 W W•-• ^.N d W M•-+ d d .-.-..--1 Vi .-.C() .-. .--�M 1n W -C I O O O O O O O O O O O O 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0-.O O O g Q O q Q q q-.O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0-. CD c l r47nQz ¢azC4Z-alx> > ..a0 W E-ZE- aXUW C4WC4 W FUS-•«-.U•-•.- - -•U 0,M <E- C4D-0Qw ¢ ¢¢ ¢---- a ¢ ¢ww-..- OOOQa ¢oo ¢G000¢ ¢¢ww000¢ ¢WO o, > 1 a-3"'1 7 z M Z� E�x m z z z z z z z z z O O a>>a.>> >>a.a.a a.a.a.a. a x a a C4 o c i •• d 1 N 1n Y l!'1 N V;in In 1n In V7 V'f In V7 N v;.n V7 In N 1n V1�n N N v.to V7 v,N vl 1!")In�n N vl N N Vi N 1!'1 v: a`.ON a'.a\m O,m 01 m m m O,a\m 01 C�01 m 01 01 a\m 01 a1 m m m m O\a\01 m O`.(0,m m m m a1 a, -• c v .. I r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r N U Q I \\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ G I N N N N N N N N N N.c V c V N N(V N N N c V N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N c V N N N N c V N N N 7n v I O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0. \\ C f-W m0-.NMdIn�Or W 010 -.NMdIn tDr, W CN 0.-.NMdIn�Dr W 010 -.NMdv11Dr 0 0 4. Y v I N M M M M M M M M M M d d d d d d d d d d W n v)�n v l r'. n V I n V l v i D O O p p D a 1 p p O r r r r r r r r \\ (c U.0 IMMMM M M M M M m M M M M M M M M M M M MM I"1 M M Mn M M M M M M M M M M M M M M MM MMMMM MML w E 1 -k rn r rnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnOrnrnrnrnrnmrnrn.rnrnrnrn.rnrna,rn a\0101 a\rn rn rn rn m a,rn m rn m a,a,m aim 0 0 v) L 7 1 7 d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d U Z I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F - >. •O I .n a -CCI 0 I � O I I a.Z c 1 N W a l GI t 0 Iz x r4 a. I _ 000004 •r A ¢ , X a4:.0 X a4 X:t aC:.4�4:L 14 a4 4 x.X. G.: .... ....x4 4 C�4 4 .0 :L 41� :L:,4 zou[- U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U V U V U U U kU7 U U ¢v u U WWUIW W I U U U U U U U U U U U U U v U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U F M-a U i w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w www w w w:Hz www w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w a v O rn o4 w cIFFFFFFFFFFFFHFHFFHFHHFFHFHWFFHFFFFFFFFFHHF@FFW\XaF O I ¢ ¢ ¢¢ ¢ 6 ¢ ¢¢ ¢ 6 ¢ ¢¢ ¢ ¢¢ ¢¢¢¢ 6 ¢¢ ¢Z¢¢¢ ¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢ 6¢ y ¢¢a < c5¢ ¢ ¢ i aaaxaocaaaJxaxaaaaxaaacG pG r�4aa> �rxaaaacGacG a aN as\ZFFa ¢WWW W(>,:W W W W W W W W W W W W A- \W alzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzazzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzz-lAE-Fz c. i O�C�CW7C�Cw7Cw7 cW7G7Cw7�(wj��O����C:C7���(�W(Wj(7�Cw�C7OC�C�(.�Cw7C�(�C.7C�C� C7�t�a-.c.. M W o o "4aX UvuUvu__UUUc>UUc_ UUuuvUUUUU_v�_vuuUc�vuuvUuc>vUc�vUr�U_Uaw giFFFFFFFHFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFa4FHFFFFFFFFFFFFFHFaU aH U I 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z Z Z Z Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z�Z u10o000000OOOOo0000000000o0A000000000000000 OOf�E-5W0 I F F F F H F F F F F F F H F F F F F F H F F H H H .F Z F H F F F F F F F F F F F+F F H o4 W¢F L 1 A A 0 0 5 5 0 5 0 A A a a a 5 A A A O O A 5 o g q A 0 q 0 5 q A A A a A A a .'�. 5 ¢0 W WD C I r 00-+0�vJt70.-+o0Ono0••+oo000000000q 0 t 00 t-0000m r Q colo o O N W 0 o 1 0000.-.O ,0 et Oto O o 00000000000 tn—o,0,D 0000 O O 00,o O'n o 00 h at 0 E I vl NgOC t�S�O NInN N,C viO�O,000NggvlOv1000000 r�0 N .NNOIn t'1NOv)4 t"'J( 0C; O ") ¢ 17�N-;t th th th O,NgNm NO V q.rq 00N to�o m a%t")q.--.�...O��O�t7 et•-�d'CJ101-d-af7 e1'�D NQ\f- N �D,fi N z1 I � I cl00000000000000000000000000000000000000000pp0000000 a J o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 .900000c) c E1 . . . . . . ¢ 1 1 U I h I G Al G v a , I roo..ovlnt�o .-.000roo--•000000000000t-�govJocn0000t�� v 1 a0o . . . . . .v,.�oo r�ovo�000g000000000tn o�o�og0000q� t^i000�vo G C W C I v,N W 00m�o.In N.,p"0 NCc'glt-!O v�00ggNt�gN.-.NNOto t',N Oto Qt7p0 QOM 0 u v; o 7 1 a t N 7 t^,v to t7 0,N q N p,st N 0 7 q st'W q N In�0 0,a\M q•--. .-.O, O,t7 V•-. O�O� Q c7 st• aJ E m• G O I E I t^,.--� N.�.,O�p �\O.••.t••; L u I N .r cli u 1.0 1 .-. to = 1 Z.0 " u E I G ••- v I >, 14 G u C;• d rr , z to O O F Z 11.. ¢ i z —Z -..W wz > -0 F ala � a 0 • 0.F z W W tr- c 1 W U—-< oa wa E E.., C7^M^ wU EW- ZO qa U c , z av�v�c7^ o U rv� w �� ¢�-> za wAa> U �� `n 1 a .a� x In rn.-•O ZZ..a aM co I > ^aaow ^Ow ¢w A ^a =C4 W < W a aEa-•z q 1 a FOaxrGOa az 0W W OW W mF o tiv) w _ WU ¢^ w 1 v W W UAa a W E•Fz aFUU-ZZf-Wn A �^ W -a q W F�G.zO^wW Zo^W.-.. .a0 Faa..aF ai^3 �Wjaa"#W0 -W a [z:v;^A DW ZO <MW VIIW.Z ^ =E PCZzw[s p0ucv ¢wFwa ¢O¢ Zw W> A4^w3U 12aOW^Ow..a.-. zAzx a4a ¢wtr-O ivH u¢ ZO.-I—W AwFu z .O a 0q ¢OOF^rnU <::)"0OH¢>-Z •ax E•F¢AA¢ZZZ-.00xa I OW Z Wx -anmw Zk UZa.-� W WOWtn tnzFO ¢¢a v»aawOQH3 � O G I aC7otz.rnZXdv ¢N ¢ Oz W U � FZ«-�WFF Faazwozx a4W O ¢¢ cn3,F as F v l a AO I ¢'" Z `� ¢ ocn.4.�yWAx0000.o5 F- E ¢^a ¢33za ..awOao I W a Om -. - 0U 5 >-amQZ Oa4 a a �wZ Z x 1 z W u�- COE- ".1F•�jz�, zaOv�tnZ> ¢¢�aaaFFUxwwzQ •aa> Z I Z]4> xA W -+Aax.-�W W f I A I atLFoUv)W UAF H.]x•-+W W A -- 1 OUWFA W c. zzzz W AZx WO WMWZZUzaaOZA --Oa•-�-.o v)z Zv)w z'',aUUaZa 1 >- E-FOoxQ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ E. 0 ¢O- ax--aW¢.-.50 x I oaa-.zzz •o ¢¢ww .•. ¢q¢o sk I > atnaaFv� v rntntnr�Umtiv�v�Utitn3Fau cncnFE- Z;0zz=)O < 43x3 WZ <=)<c- c i ----------------------------------------- G 1 N th v)rr ...t'1 In"�o W r O�r •••.c7 V'W�N O N m— .--. It .- —�fi r.N.-.�.--� .-.N l�t7..-.[F':'.•-r'R 01 ti V1 ^r OC L I N0000000.-+...-.N•7�D000000•-+•-+00000000000000000000'.O o 000 Q c c 1 a� �EFO [,.G zzzzzzzwwo�aaoaf zaacFC�- c oac�aarn_az_'_FFaa3a-. c > i aazaa�aiaiv¢i �r¢nrnrnvai�Wvaiv aivOiaivOivgiExF�EaFEaDZ7D D>33333zvaixoo I vJ a\vJ v,.n v,v,v;.n v).n vn In v,vJ v,In vJ vJ vJ,n 1 a O,O,O,O,O,O,O`Q,O, Q, vJ v,v,In v,�,v, � v)vJ vJ vJ v,.n L--• Y . O,Ch T 0,O,O,a h v,a O,m O,O,O,O,01 O,0,c`.O,0,m c,01 O,o,m Q,O,O,a,,m O,O,On O,0,,, v .-• 1 r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r rhr r r r r v o0 N(V(l N r l N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N(V N N N N 04 N N N N N N I N N l N N N N:'.N N N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O+..O 0 0 0 0 0 0 \\ C G 4 1 .b.TO 0,O--�N t•',vv1,Dr 000,0.-.NN t-; �In,Or oc 0,0 •-•Ntn at vl,Dr q,10,0•--•N rl•7•n O0 -• 1 v I rroOgq 00ggqqaq0,��������O,p000000000C•--� .--.NNNNNN \\ w u� I r-;t^,rr,�nr7c7rh to t•'1 n t•',nr,rh r✓`,�n,to�.th to�v V•7 v v� v•a •a v --V ----•-• tot- L v E I rnarnrnrna,-Ir I,a,a,rno.-4t rnt rnrnrnrnrn.rnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrno,rnrnrnrnrnrn�10,ONrnrnrn0)(7, 00In LO I rvvvvva v vvavtvv v vvvr vvv vvavvavizrvvavva �Ulo0o00000000000000000000000000000000000000'10000000 z0 c I a 1 I o, 000005 'L:GXXxx:<xxxxxxaC••CxxXxxxxxx •4 '4:4x4:4xx:4 '4xxxxxxx:4: x4<,4 4x4:4 ouH Ic;vuuvuUUUUUuvuUuuuUUUUuuvvvui�uuuuuvUUuuUUuvUuvUUi� o>- ¢ 1 (i;wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww a , xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx IUUvvuuuUUUVUvuuuuUUUuuUvuUuuuuuUUUUUUUUvuvUUUUUuu 1 o a w w w w w w w W w w w W w w w Www w W w w w w w w w w w w w www w W w w w w W w w w w w w W w ¢A H c I F H H F H F F H H H H H H H H F H H H H H H H H H H E-•E-•H F F F H H H F H E- < ¢ ¢ ¢¢ ¢ ¢¢ ¢¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢¢¢¢ ¢¢6 ¢ 6 ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢¢ ¢ ¢¢ ¢¢ ¢ ¢¢ ¢ ¢ ¢6 d 6¢ d¢¢¢¢ •� I 04 C4 w' C W'W C:wC.'C40:C4 C4 104 x C4 a C4 W 0x Ca C4 C4 w 04 C4 w a 4 C4 C4 C4 04 IY•O:C:P:C4 W.C4 w'CwwC4 P'.Ix CC .• I W W.w W W WWW W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W WWW W W W W W W w w w W W W WWW W W W W W W W clzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz:zzzzzz .� � 0000000000000070000�CW700tw70000Cw7Cw7cw70C7Cw70000Cw70000000cw�OGw70Cw7 v , vil Uti v_UU_U_UUUUUU_U__UUUUUUU_U_UU_U_U_UU__UUU_U_UU_U_UUUVUUUUUVUUUUU_ AIHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHE-HHFHHHHHHHHHHHFHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH Y I E���� .c.����.'E��.e.'E�:E�.e..E.����:E��E�.E�.c���f�.GE.e.��E��•`E:£�� u 1 0000000000000000000000000o00o0000000o0000o000o000 cia���������a�aa��aa�a��a�aDD::)5E-F-aaaF�F-5F-55E--I-E-E-E-f-E- G 100-+0 o O N ID to 00000001n Ot O t-000000 't m OBD OOOO%0 ONOO O ! OOtn OOOIn V MOOOO�OOOO�NO00000--+N oO NOM to OO OIOh G to Oh O 100000 •- 0000 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E i h lnh V kD NNo to Oh 0 N 00 d'tt 0�.•-i 0.0[�ko Dr--'too W MNM �O ¢ I OOh -.p.-.O�pOM NtnO•••�7nN•-+ OOOtn t�.-.M O�Ot 00�C'i O� NCO NOO�t��MOCO to O�MOON [� 1 .--•h.. M NNN N.-+N M N .-rM d�.r v-tN V N N NSM M r- ++ I .. N I M M .--• ^' N N zl 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 aof l00000000a0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E I ¢ i U 1 .. I N ! O p 1 c K 1 I O O•-+SO O N 0�o O 000000+nrnOh O o 0000•-+0hh00to•7.-th O 0•.o X0000�oONo0 h 1 0 0 to O O Oto d M 0 0 0 0�OO OOi N O W O O O N 00 N O M 00 rn O h to O h 0 0 0 0 0.-•�00 0 0 OC ti G 1 C)In W�d'OS•-tOOhtD�h ..�W 00 tn N �tCtot7MctNM V aW MM 0 Eh h - I OOh .-.O •-+O�W MNtn O-�tn N.-I fD Otn h-.MOt0 00 tD Qi NEON wMh V Mo W In O1 M w h •G �� O E I C- M(V NN C4 NM N .-.M V'tt—hN,* N N .--+ NSM .-. M 4' go" C7 ¢ 1 M M •• •.• N N 0 $.0 1 h � 1 y �nc <.,w I A u E I v.. to s. 1. 1 ¢ ¢¢ 6 ¢ 6 ¢6 ¢ ¢ ¢¢ ¢¢¢¢6¢ ¢ 6 ¢¢ ¢ ¢ ¢¢¢ 6 ¢¢ ¢6 ¢ ¢¢¢¢6¢¢ ¢ ¢¢ ¢ 0= c. to 1 V2 o A H 1 ++U to CG I U C 1 ^ ^U ^ 1 C> W to < W ¢ .O^ Co Y U0rr ¢a rn 3WU ¢ H_ x^Oj ^ 0 0^ U W U U E0 3 - 0 N ^l oz 3 >OrnH Urr > U ¢¢ Wx- 0 f I UA a3 a > UHzx U^aUm z z > u 00 > 0 u I Z ¢ ¢C W ZDOW^rr E-C4 I ¢ 50 0 ^a ¢rn>0z .wa WvwiHHgZr�L a 0 a^Zt-. H ¢^HH O z< •HWW—M �Z �� � ¢¢ ^U^ Oa. 00E- �> V) U W ¢UEE SHED> ¢Oa0o4a aA> H 0zu0 OawU GW Hw w ^00 aH¢wvatr -� U ¢z tr� W; w 0U a w <U ¢az.-7 v.0 (-WO HMW < W ZZa U) — aa�-www <— W 00 W A ¢ c4>XZW^Z�xUW ZUU>M W W W UM^_Oow 44w>-aXLL. . z ¢.Z UW W^HaUH00 E-•0. °Soa ¢owa ¢"wf- a> >H ¢OxU Hw zE- <w0 O U I W 0U-gaH < <0zZ.? <OZ Irz~C4 Z wHa ¢wxa(r atr z[r¢o z a o to E ^-•R1c4 0"0C.W ¢U wav�a0 ¢ xwHHO az a I Urr ¢ ¢ ¢ H-U <wo % WZZOHZ Wzw MO DW3rrwoQ W x 1 zc4 uv � m uazw • -w>: roo0¢ �0rgo� • otr� Maxx aUW •W 3 z 1 ¢ w0 1 Z W\> ¢a4E•.W MW E-0 wa zq - A HHwa I HcrH 1 > GU.¢ ¢Fa—O,E-W W OO.cL'a>W E- c4 <co Z w'WHU Z GQ�ZZggZf•- �-+ v� W gZO,HH ¢C ¢> xaOW-00(-W 5wonoo>• ¢ ¢ ?• ¢W O ¢ ¢COW WCZ W w �fza^^axCc4c4v�v�OowwH5 q3^a G i to M 0 Vl.-.M O N"N to to h .--•N .-�h Mtn .•-� •-••�M .-r M Mtn p .-�.--i V M.--• Ag00C>00 V OOhON00 0 0 0 0NO0000000 QA000000<t O•--tN OOOOOgO > qU « aaazwwoaaa>wHx ¢trtrr>aawE. 0 .•. ¢E QAozza� ¢ z ..ave. a u I COAZa HFHF ¢¢ ¢W xaOWt:OOE W O WO [,00>�< <OO W W ¢wo < <OOE^WC4ZW WO.•. a. > 1 » ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ uUUUUuuAa.cl.c c7titiaaf� �zw»aao4xxrnrnvirrinHHOA3> 3 o c N I �"� In lT to lr to to N to N.V'i 1/":to to to to"'n..to I!]h 1n h N to N Vi to t!')to to to to to to�to to in to to to to in W— Y I O`.O�0�Q1 Ol O1 0� 0.m 0`.m m( ^• C N a+ I oo 00 00 W 00 W co 00 W 00 W W 00 cc W W W 00 00 W 00 00 00 00 OC 00 00 00 00 00 00 c0 o000 00 00 00 00 00 Oo 00 00 CO t0 W coU)00 OG H :.. L Cr I N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N(V N N N N C_4N N cV N N N N N N N co cV N N G I N ............. N N N N N N N N N N N 1 00000000 000000 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N •r,v.x 00000000 000000000000000000000000000 I ^ G H I to h w a:O -FNM<t to,Oh o.^ a�0 FNM stn 1p[� 00 a%O-+N M� 000\0--FNM}to�Cih Ma%0 ..NM ct pQ t- Y (D I NNNNMMMM MM MMMM-,t ,t"t�dr rd."t N�tn to tnNNtn to to �0��0<D���t(�hhhh h \\ tG U.0 1 t It Ict V It 't It d' d-<t it t V' 't tt"t ,t "t d'"� "t 'd. fid- -d- o E I S m 0\0,a%at a,m Ot m a1 0)a1 a`.01 D\a%Ot 0%ON aN ON 01 m 0�O,01 m m m 0`.m Ot oI m 0`.m QI a,m a,0,m m m m Gorr t a -T 't tea 1td- -It V v 't ,td v 7 V c V v t t v�tvvvvI-avvv �vvvTta 'tvv-t�vav • U Z I O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0o 0 0O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0(D 0 0 C)0 1 Z C ti I N 7J 1 0 IL I -V©V006 oUE^ I U Off» ¢ I wto a Ixx 1 U U W ft 1 Q Q C7 1 WWW IxaQ I W W alzzo ^ 1 W W H t I 00 u 1 F V 1 U U•-• 1 ¢a¢ U I ¢Q-. w 1 I 1 it C 1 •-�O O I �O 1 10 11 O O 1 0 1 0 II G I i 1 11 E 1 �o O O 1 1` I t` 11 1r;v,W I 1 !2 O 1 0 11 1 00 N( I !n 1 !n 11 I .-+ 11 N I 1 00 1 oG It 1 1 1 n cl000lo loa cl000lo Ion G 1 , 1 11 E I 1 I 11 6 U 1 1 1 11 m 1 I I u � •• I I I u G Q I i I 11 a x 1 1 I u 1 '+0 0 1 %rl V, i 1`O O 1 0 1 0 II G C 0 G -^ N In 7 1 m to W 1 0 I O 11 u E ON O O I 00 N W I I- E :C p N L7 ¢ I I W 1 OO 11 :J t.O I 1 .-' I ••+ 11 t' 7 I 1 I II .. h d N I A A N 1 ¢Q¢ I L •.+ d 1 W C Q[••. I 1 I T C a. U lu LG 1 !n ON h l C I c { N u _ I f O C N I W c E C 1 x G y G 1 N V, Lr 1 E•. H {..� . 1 cG v O Ix x m 1 x-033 O q I w z �. 1 E 0> 1 F W iC C E i 3wa U o Z 1 U) D p I a Z 0 7 1 00 w t m u m ¢ 0 1 YO G I x tilcoo v I 00 > I 3 > f c C,IT 0\ c u xr.m L A G 1 N N N v'• T I O O O O' _\ C N u .\ 1C UD 1 ��t V L N E 1U P.O\ �Otn L 7 I -It It d- •�U 2 1 0 0 0 L 1 v O I C, . Z c w I N 000007 I REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL Mee4g Date: 03/14/95 CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item : A-6 Through: Andy Takata, City Manager C From: Lee Price, City Clerk 3 SUBJECT: i Resolution supporting Senator Jack O'Connell's bill, SB 1 XI, relative to waiving the local match for disaster relief. 1 RECOMMENDATION: i Adopt Resolution No. 25-95 Supporting and Endorsing Senate Bill 1 X (O'Connell). BACKGROUND: - Senator Jack O'Connell has requested that the City of Ata cadero support his . Senate Bill 1 X. His letter and a copy of the bill are attached. Under current law, when the federal government declare a disaster, it pays 75% of disaster-related costs. The remaining 25% is paid fdr by the state and localities. Senator O'Connell recognizes that cities and countios are experiencing difficult financial times. The bill waives the local match requirement. 1 l 3 1 I 1 1 3 I 1 000 018 RESOLUTION NO. 25-95 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF 0 ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING SENATE BILL 1X (O'CONNELL) URGENCY STATUTE RELATIVE TO DISASTER RELIEF WHEREAS, commencing January 3, 1995, the State of California has experienced heavy rainfall and flooding; and WHEREAS, rains are expected to continue and more flooding is anticipated; and; WHEREAS, many businesses and residents in the City of Atascadero have been impacted greatly by recent devastating floods; and WHEREAS, the President of the United States and the Governor of the State of California have officially proclaimed that the storms and flooding that occurred in the State of California were disasters, thus qualifying persons affected for various forms of governmental assistance and relief; and WHEREAS, the State of California and the United States Government have entered into an agreement for federal assistance in connection with the floods; and WHEREAS, undercurrent law, when the federal government declares a disaster, it pays 75% of the disaster-related costs; while the remaining 25% is paid for by the state and localities; and WHEREAS, local governments, including the City of Atascadero, are constrained by increased demands for services and low revenue projections; and WHEREAS, Senate Bill 1 X (O'Connell)would waive local governments' match requirement for securing federal disaster relief funds while ensuring that prompt and vitally necessary relief is provided. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Atascadero as follows: SECTION 1 . The City Council of the City of Atascadero hereby endorses and supports Senate Bill 1 X (O'Connell). SECTION 2. The City Council of the City of Atascadero does hereby direct the City Clerk to send a certified copy of this resolution to California State Senator Jack O'Connell. 000009 Resolution No. 25-95 Page Two On motion by Councilperson and seconded by Councilperson , the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the. following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ADOPTED: ATTEST: CITY OF ATASCADERO By: LEE PRICE, City Clerk R. DAVID BEWLEY, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: ARTHER R. MONTANDON, City Attorney 0000110 SACRAMENTO OFFICE STATE CAPITOL.ROOM 2187 SE SACRAMENTO.CA 95814 V �' (916)445-5405 SAN LUIS ORE 1260 CHORRO STREET,SUITE ATata foµnia 1�tatje {y■ yr� N l0% SAN LUIS OBISPO.CA 93401 yT�Oj CALF (805)547-1800 SENATOR SANTA BARBARAOFFICESU JACK O'CONNELL COMMITTEES: 228 WEST CARRIt-LO.SUITE F CHAIR: SANTA BARBARA.CA 93101 TOXICS AND PUBLIC SAFETY (805)966-2296 EIGHTEENTH SENATORIAL DISTRICT MANAGEMENT VENTURA OFFICE MEMBER: 89 S.CALIFORNIA STREET.SUITE E BUDGET AND FISCAL REVIEW VENTURA,CA 93001 BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONS (805)641-1500 EDUCATION February 21, 1995 JUDICIARY (('�^ NATURAL RESOURCES KCITY Lee Price, City Clerk OF ATASCADERO City of Atascadero t(,0tf-RK1sOFFICE �....,� 6500 Palma Atascadero, CA 93422 Dear Lee: In response to the recent devastating floods that have occurred throughout our state, I am sponsoring Senate Bill 1 X. This bill waives a local government's match requirement for securing federal disaster relief funds. Under current law,when the federal government declares a disaster,it pays 75% of disaster-related costs.The remaining 25% is paid for by the state and localities. SB 1 X would relieve the locals of their burden for the recent floods. My bill is in keeping with what the Legislature has done in other disasters such as the Loma Prieta and Northridge Earthquakes and the East Bay Fire. As you know, local governments are squeezed by increased demand for services and low revenue projections. I believe the state needs to assist them in light of this widespread devastation. 1 am requesting that your governing board,if it has not already, adopt a resolution in support of my legislation. I believe your support will be needed to ensure the bill's final passage. Unfortunately, there are a significant number of legislators who oppose my bill, therefore,it is imperative that we demonstrate broad support. On a final note, I recently amended SB 1X to reflect the fact that the rains have not stopped falling and we may still incur more flooding this Winter and early Spring. The bill now coincides with the federal declaration. If you have any questions or concerns regarding my measure or other flood-related legislation now being considered in the State Capitol, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, dOJCK O'CONNELL :pasj r SENT BY: SENATOR OCONNELL; 2-28-95 11 :02; 18055471800 =- CITY OF ATASCADERO; ##1 !2 PAGE 1 Display 1995-1996 Sill Text - INFORMATION • BILL NUMBER: SBX1 1 BILL TEXT AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY FEBRUARY 23, 1995 AMENDED IN SENATE JANUARY 25, 1995 INTRODUCED BY Senators O'Connell, Thompson, and Leslie (Coauthors: Senators Calderon, Dills, and Polanco) JANUARY 23, 1995 An act to amend Section 8686 of the Government Code, relating to disaster relief, and declaring the urgency thereof, to take effect' inuilediately. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST . SB 1, as amended, O'Connell. Disaster relief. Under the Natural Disaster Assistance Act, the Director of Emergency Services is required to administer a program which provides financial assistance to local agencies for the repair, restoration, or raplacompnt of public real property of the agency that is damaged or destroyed by a natural disaster. This act further requires that the state share for any eligible project be no more than 75% of total state eligible costs,, except for certain occurrences for which the state share may be 100% of the ;total state eligible costs. This bill would add to those occurrences for which the; state share may be 100% of the total state eligibility costs, the floods that occurred commencing January 3, 1995, until the termination date reflected in the federal-state agreement for di.aanter relief. This bill would make certain legislative findings and declarations regarding a statewide public purpose of the bill. This bill would become o_oerative only if Ata 2 of the 1995-96 First Extraordinary Session is enacted. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute. Vote: 2/3. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no. of Po&t-i" Fax Note 7671 From A .I.z.. Ph r.e Phone# ru+•rt Fix 9 PAGE 2 Display 1995-1996 Bill Text - INFORMATION BILL NUMBER: SBX1 1 • BILL TEXT THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Section 8686 of the Government Code is amended to read: 8686. (a) For any eligible project, the state share shall amount to no more than 75 percent of total state eligible costs. (b) Notwithstanding subdivision (a), the state share shall be up to 100 percent of total state eligible costs connected with the following events: (1) The October 17, 1989, Loma Prieta earthquake. (2) The October 20, 1991, East Bay fire. (3) The fires that occurred in southern California from October 1, 1993, to November 30, 1993, inclusive. (4) The January 17, 1994, Northridge earthquake. (5) The floods that occurred in California as a result of the storms during the period specified in the agreement between the state and the United States for federal financial assistance in connection with floods commencing January 3, 1995. i • (c) The state shall make no allocation for any project application resulting in a state share of less than two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500) under this section. SEC. 2. The Legislature finds and declares that this act fulfills a statewide public purpose because the Governor of California hau officially proclaimed that the storms and flooding that occurred in specified counties, during January 1995, were disasters, thus qualifying persons affected for various forms of governmental assistance and relief. SEC. 3. This act shall become operative only if Assembly Bill No. 2 of the 1995-96 First Extraordinary Session is enacted. SEC. 4. This act is an urgency statute necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety within the meaning of Article IV of the Constitution and shall go into immediate effect. The facts constituting the necessity are: In order to provide prompt and vitally necessary relief and facilitate recovery from the heavy damage to livres and property inflicted by the storms and flooding that took place in California in January 1995, and to permit the more efficient operation of county government as soon as possible, it is necessary that this act take effect immediately. • 000`013 i i REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL Meeti� Date: 02/28/95 CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item : A-7 4 r Through: Andy Takata, City Manager i From: Lee Price, City Clerk SUBJECT: Notary Service Fees. RECOMMENDATION: a I Adopt Resolution No. 24-95 amending fees for notarial services. BACKGROUND: ' Fees for notarial services are established and amended by State Law. The attached draft resolution rescinds Resolution No. 18-91 and brin' s the fees that the City may charge for notarial services in line with those that have Been adopted by the State. I i a y 1 i i i i j i 000014 RESOLUTION NO. 24-95 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING FEES FOR NOTARIAL SERVICES WHEREAS, California Government Code Sections 8206, 8211 and 8223 provide that certain fees may be collected for notarial services; and WHEREAS, it is appropriate to establish such fees to offset notary commission fees paid by the City of Atascadero. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Atascadero as follows: SECTION 1 . Resolution No. 18-91 is hereby rescinded. SECTION 2. The following fees are hereby adopted: Acknowledgment: $10.00 per signature Jurat: $10.00 per signature Depositions. .$20.00 for all deposition services, not including $5.00 per oath and 5$ for certificate Protest of Non-Payment: $10.00 Notice of Protest: $ 5.00 Recording a Protest: $ 5.00 Photocopy of a Journal Entry 30 cents per photocopy of entry SECTION 3. These fees will become effective immediately. On motion by Councilperson and seconded by Councilperson , the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote: 0000-.s Resolution No. 24-95 Page Two AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ADOPTED: ATTEST: CITY OF ATASCADERO By: LEE PRICE, City Clerk R. DAVID BEWLEY Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: ARTHER R. MONTANDON, City Attorney • 000016 / RESOLUTION NO. 18-91 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA ESTABLISHING FEES FOR NOTARIAL SERVICES WHEREAS, Sections 8206, 8211 and 8223 of the Government Code provide that certain fees may be collected for notarial services; and WHEREAS, it is appropriate to establish such fees to offset notary commission fees paid by the City of Atascadero. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that the Atascadero City Council does hereby adopt the following fees for notarial services: Acknowledgments $ 5.00 per signature Jurats $ 5.00 per signature Immigration Forms $10.00 for each set of forms, not including fee for Jurat or acknowledgment Depositions $10.00 for all deposition services, not including $2.00 for oath and $2.00 for certificate Protest of Nonpayment $ 4.00 Notice of Protest $ 2.00 Recording a Protest $ 2.00 Photocopy of a Journal Entry $ .30 per copy of a Notary journal entry On motion by Couacilmember Dexter, seconded by Councii.mmber Borgeson, the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote: AYES: Counci.lmembers Sheirs, Borgeson, Dexter, Nimmo and Mayor Lilley NOES: None ABSENT: None 000017 Resolution 18-91 Page 2 ADOPTED: March 12, 1991 By: ROBERT B. LILLEY, Mayor ATTEST: 1 ' E DA ,"-Cit# Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: P HER MOT DON, ity Attorney APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: RAY WINDSOR, City Manager 4 o©(� t __ a REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item: A-8 CITY OF ATASCADERO Meeting Dote: 03/14/95 Through: Andrew J Takata, City Manager Via: Henry Engen, Community Development Director AX From: �J, �jSteve Sylvester, City Engineer a i SUBJECT: Acceptance of the Slope Rehabilitation Projects improvements. s RECOMMENDATION• Staff recommends that the City Council accept the subject improvements as complete and requests authorization! from Council to release the 10% retention in the amount of $17,742;. 02. DISCUSSION• 3 Staff has reviewed the completed Slope Rehabilitat4on Projects and determined the improvements to be in substantial conformance with the project plans and specifications. FISCAL IMPACT• Council Resolution No. 97-94 approved a constructi6n contract with A-Jay Excavating in the amount of $182 , 290.08. At-endant expenses were estimated to be $76, 061. 11 The total project cost was estimated to be $258, 363 . 11 (see Attachment B) . Actual expenditures under the construction icontract were $177, 240. 23 . The total expenditure to date for attendant expenses is $44, 663 . 44 . Total project cost to date -is $221;,903 . 67 . ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A - Resolution 97-94 Attachment B - 9/13/94 Staff Report Attachment C - Notice of Completion N:\RDK\93123.RPT i I 000019 A-m A<A &4r10r REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL Meeting Date: 9-13-94 CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item: A-14 Through: Andrew Takata, City Manager is via: Henry Engen, Community Development Director 43416 From: Steve Sylvester, City Engineer SUBJECT: Bid Award for the Slope Rehabilitation Projects RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the following: 1. Adopt Resolution No. 97-94 awarding a contract to construct the Slope Rehabilitation Projects to A-Jay Excavating, Inc. 2 . Allocate $40, 000 in Developer Impact Fees toward completion of -the project 3 . Waive a minor bid irregularity with regard to Item 5 - Silt Fence of the San Marcos Road portion of the project. DISCUSSION: Bids were solicited in order to construct repairs to the failed road slopes on Enchanto Road, San Marcos Road and El Monte Road. Bids for the project were opened on August 30, 1994 . The work involves overexcavating the failed portion of the road slope, installation of subsurface drainage structures, construction of an engineered slope using a soil stabilization fabric, repair of the failed portions of the roadway and various erosion control measures. The bid summary prepared by the City and the itemized bid summary are included in this report for reference along with an excerpt from the adopted 5 Year Capital Improvement Program. The low bid was submitted by A-Jay Excavating, Inc. in the amount of $182 , 302 . 00. The engineers construction cost estimate for the project was $201, 091. 00. The bids have been checked for completeness and accuracy. There is an apparent clerical error with regard to Item 5 - Silt Fence of the San Marcos Road portion of the project. Specifically, the unit price stated for this item was not in line with those used for the other portions of the project (see the attached letter from A-Jay Excavating for an explanation and corrected unit price) . Staff recommends that Council waive this irregularity and find A-Jay Excavating, Inc. to be the lowest responsible bidder. 000020 i /4-rracHNiE NT � � �� RESOLUTION NO. 97-94 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING A CONTRACT TO A-JAY EXCAVATING, INC. FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE SLOPE REHABILITATION PROJECTS CITY OF ATASCADERO BID NO. 94-04 ' WHEREAS, the Slope Rehabilitation Projects are identified in 5- year Capital Improvement Plan and the currentcapital budget adopted by the City Council of the City of Atascadero, California; and WHEREAS, on August 30, 1994 sealed bids were publicly opened for the Slope Rehabilitation Projects and A-Jay Excavating, Inc. was found to be the lowest responsible bidder; and WHEREAS, the public interest and general welfare will be served by construction of the Slope Rehabilitation Projects. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Atascadero does resolve as follows: 1. The Mayor is hereby authorized to execute an agreement with A-Jay Excavating, Inc. for the construction of the Slope Rehabilitation Projects in the amount of $182,290. 08. 2 . The City Manager is hereby authorized to make minor corrections or modifications of a mathematical or clerical nature. 3 . The City Engineer is hereby authorized to approve contract change orders up to 10% of the contract amount. 4 . The Finance Director is hereby authorized to appropriate $40, 000 in Developer Impact Fees for the Slope Rehabilitation Projects; release and expend monies from the Road Slope Failure funds; and issue warrants to comply with the terms of this agreement. On a motion by Councilperson Luna seconded by Councilperson Highland , the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote: i i 000021 Resolution No . 97-94 Page Two On motion by Councilperson Luna and seconded by Councilperson Highland, the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll .call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Highland, Johnson, Luna and Mayor Bewley NOES : None ABSENT: Councilmember Carden ADOPTED: September 13 , 1994 ATTEST: CITY OF ATASCADERO r By: LEE PRICE, City Clerk DAVID BEWLEY, ayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: i • V ART ER R. MATIANDO , City Attorney 000022 FISCAL IMPACT: Total project costs are estimated to be: Construction Bid $182 , 302 . 00 Construction contingency @ 10% 18 , 230. 20 SUBTOTAL $200, 532 . 20 Soils investigation $ 9, 300. 00 Soils engineer construction inspection and testing 16, 980. 00 Grant research and application 2, 219 . 09 Design engineering and survey 19,971.82 Contract administration 1,980. 00 Construction inspection 5,400. 00 Construction staking 1,980. 00 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST '', $258, 363 . 11 A State Highway Account (SHA) grant in the amount of $295, 000. 00 was obtained for the repair of four road slope failures within the City. Of the total grant, a net amount of $75, 365. 43 was expended on the Laurel Avenue slope repair project (a $7, 387. 05 reimbursement was obtained from Southern California Gas and Chevron Oil for protecting their utilities during construction) . The remaining Road Slope Failure account balance for use on the above is $219, 634 . 57 - leaving $38,728 . 54 to be obtained from other sources to complete this project. Staff recommends that $40, 000 of the Developer Impact Fees which were originally encumbered for the Garcia Road bridge replacement project now be allocated to the Slope Rehabilitation Projects since it now appears pp that grant funding will be available for the bridgee replacement. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A, Resolution 97-94 Attachment B, Bid Summary Attachment C, Itemized Bid Summary_„ Attachment D, Excerpt from 5-year CIP Attachment E, Letter from A-Jay Excavating 93123.RPT 000023 3 _ 1 RECORDING REQUESTED BY: (and when recorded, mail to:) City Clerk CITY OF ATASCADERO 6500 Palma Avenue Atascadero, CA 93422 NOTICE OF COMPLETION NO TRANSFER OF PROPERTY Notice is hereby given pursuant to Civil Code Section 3093: 1. The undersigned is corporate officer for the City of Atascadero, owner of property hereinafter described. 2. The full name of the owner is the City of Atascadero. 3. The full address of the owner is: 6500 Palma Avenue, Atascadero, CA 93422 4. The nature of the interest of the owner is in fee. 5. A work of improvement on the property hereinafter described was completed on February 1, 1995. 6. The work done was repair failed road slopes. 7. The name of the contractor who performed such work of improvement was A-Jay Excavating. The date contract was entered into was September 28, 1995. 8. The property on which said work of improvement was completed was in the City of Atascadero, County of San Luis Obispo, State of California, and is described as follows: San Marcos, El Monte and Enchanto Roads. 9. The street address of said property is: Various. Dated: ANDREW J. TAKATA, City Manager City of Atascadero VERIFICATION I, the undersigned, say that I am the City Manager, declarant of the foregoing Notice of Completion; I have read said Notice of Completion and know the contents thereof; the same is true of my own knowledge. declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on at the City of Atascadero, California. ANDREW J. TAKATA, City Manager City of Atascadero 93123A02.ATA 000024 i 1 i i REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL Meeting Date: 3114/95 CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item: A-9 Through : Andy Takata . City Manager From: Bradford Whitty, Finance Director- -SUBJECT: Adoption of proposed Mid-Year adjustments . RECOMMENDATION: i Staff recommends C i t v. Council adopt Resolution ?1-95 . amending the Adopted Budget for the 1994-95 fiscal year . BACKGROUND: City Council ! staff . and the public met on Match 2nd to review the proposed adjustments to the 1994-05 Annual Budget , DISCUSSION: Attached are the .lid-Year adjustments that were+ presented on .larch 2 . 199; . There were no adjustments recommended by r_ouncii . staff , or the public at that time , The annual budget is a flelibie document meaning it can be changed by council action from time to time ; if the City receives money from the Grange County investm*nt Pool (OCIP) at a later date but within the fiscal vear . stiff may request changes in the budget for the effected fund( s � . i i i 0000,15 Meeting Date: 3/02/95 REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL Agenda item: A-1 CITY OF ATASCADERO (Note Revisions 2/28/95) i. Through: Andy Takata. City Manager�tv From: Bradford Whitt., Finance Dire SUBJECT' 1994-95 Mid-year Budget Review and Report . RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Council receive the report . review. and regardinff the Mid-Year Review. Resolution provide direction g 21-95 . Amending the 1994-95 Aarch o e14 dme ett .. 11 be placed an the consent agenda for to BACKGROUND: find a summarized version of the Attached you will proposed budget changes . This report serves as a al health . starting point to discuss each Fund' s fueatons through This report will attempt to answer some fundn the use of footnotes following each . Some Generai points need to made concerning the report . The amounts shown under the "Original Budget" column erents en from Page 4 of the 1994-95 budget . Prop step revenues and expendiJirectorurese metwre withone teachaDe_aartmethree nt :lead process ,Department nti calculations ,1 } Finance Supervisor , 21 Finance Director 'i)adjusts and/or ty amounts based on first meeting a Department Beads and/or Department �Partmsnt Manager , Finance Director , ns Supervisors meet balances under "Amended1oBudget" have been ng fund oa adjusted to actual audited amounts . DISCUSSION: The following discussion will follow the funds in order shown in the report . General Fund: The General Fund' s beginning fund balance has been adjusted to zero because ethe S32 , 873cadero Library:.at }Generai 1Fund ' s designated for the principa" iy revenues have been decreased by S2s , S1.0 . Thi{ether funds and due to a reduction of transfers in from earnings which was precipitated by the uraun investment bankruptcy. General Fund i-ounty investment Pool (GCIP} !� expenditures have been aiersatodthe Capital Oprojects. This ofundland an elimination of t r0000126 i REVISED 2/28/95 the net of other departments increases and +decreases . The contingency account has been decreased by $138 , 000 to cover those costs that were not originally budgeted. For example . booking fees are expected to cost $30 , 000 rather than the budgeted $10 .000. The General Fund' s Ending Balance is projected to be $20, 279 at June 30 , 1995 . This will be the second year that the fund has moved in a positive direction . However . a word of caution is in order because the percentage move is ronly . 3% of the projected revenues . A more comfortable margin would be 5% or $332 , 544 of projected revenues as an ending Fund Balance . Wastewater & Sewer Facility Funds: Both funds have been heavily impacted by the OCIP bankruptcy. The figures reflect this in both revenues and expenditures . The net cash for the funds are $92 , 688 and $<257 , 400> . respectively. The negative cash shortfall will need to be covered by another requested draw from OCIP. The City didnot exercise it ' s full 30% draw in January because the draw specified "only the amount needed, not to exceed 30111W" . Lake Park Pavilion: This fund continues to increase it ' s negative fund balance . Another fund will have to cover the fund ' s losses unless the fund can be turnedaround by June 30th . it will need an additional $10 . 597 to break even based on these projected figures . Recreation: The Fund ' s negative fund balanced increased due to year adjustments at June 30 . 1994 . However , the fund is projected to break-even or incur a small surplus to decrease the negative fund balance by year end . Zoo: The fund continues to increase it ' s negative fund balance with expenditures over revenues at $39 , 818 which will have to be covered by anotherfund unless additional revenues are found . Assessment Districts : The City ' s assessment districts do not reouire adjustments at this time . However . Las Encinas , 3-F Meadows . and Camino Real :assessment Districts will be hrought before the Counci i k)n March 14 . 1995 for consideration of disposition of remaining construction and State grant monies . Their budgets will be adjusted through those actions ac that time . ii 0000.7 i REVISED 2/28/95 1994-95 Mid-Year Review. continued Dial-A-Ride : The fund' s negative balance will increase due to year end audit adjustments . Revenues are projected to exceed expenditures by $31 , 459 or 71. However , these "savings" will need to be used to pay back loans made by the General Fund in prior years . See Note 12 in the 1993-94 audited Financial Statements . C.O.P. . Debt Service : The budgeted expenditures exceed revenues because the Police Impact Fees fund (Exhibit A, Page 12) lacks enough revenues to transfer, to cover the debt payments . Another fund will have to cover the shortfall of $14 ,000 unless funds are released from OCIP . Capital Projects : Many projects have been placed on hold due to the OCIP bankruptcy. City staff proposes a decrease in funding by $757 , 470 and capital outlay of $739 , 566 . Remaining funding sources exceed capital outlay by $2 ,096. This adjustment will decrease the fund' s negative fund balance and position the fund for projects in the next fiscal year once the OCIP issue is resolved. (See attachments behind Exhibit A) CONCLUSIONS: Resolution 21-95 . Amending the 1994-95 .adopted Budget . will be presented on the consent agenda for the ,March 14 , 1995 regular Council meeting . TheCitymust continue to work within it ' s means and to strive for better efficiencies . The Citv must be aggressive in raising badly needed revenues for the General Fund and several other special revenue funds . The Public . Council . and Staff must always strive to work as a team to resolve the economic problems we face . The citizen ' s incorporated Atascadero to have a stronger voice in thiscommunity ' s future . Let us not lose this voice . Recommended yid-Year ReviewMaterials : 1 ) 1994-95 Budget 2 ) 1993-94 Audited Financial Statements 3 ) Finance Director ' s and Treasurer ' s Reports for December 1994 . /u/brad/midvr95 . agd Cl000118 Resolution No. 21-95 Exhibit A Page 1 - Revised 2/28/95 Proposed Original Mid-Year Amended BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS BUDGET FUND: General Fund: July 1, 1994 Fund Balance 135,000( 1) <135,000> -0- Add Revenue 6,909,690 <258,810>(2) 6,650,880 Total Available 7,044,690 6,650,880 Less Expenses 6,725,991(5) <140,390>(3) 6,585,601 Less Contingency Reserve 183,000(5) <138,000> 45,000(4) June 30, 1995 Fund Balance $ 135,699 $ 20,279 Notes: ( 1) Unaudited Fund Balance (2) Property Taxes 2,222,500 2,222,500 Sales and Use Tax 1,900,000 1,900,000 Bed Tax 160,500 < 5,000> 155,500 Other Tax 40,400 <200> 40,200 Franchise Fees 424,600 26,000 450,600 Business Licenses 107,000 1,500 108,500 Permits & Fees 216,500 10, 100 226,600 Intergovernmental 835,600 <8,000> 827,600 Governmental Reimbursement 132,680 -�0- 132,680 Charges for Current Service 143,450 <9,3150> 134, 100 Fines & Forfeitures 31,000 <200> 30,800 Use of Money & Property 111, 800 <71,550> 40,250 Other Revenues 150,710 <9,610> 141, 100 Transfers In 432,950 <192,500> 240,450 Net Revenue Decrease $6,909,690 <2581810> $6,650,880 (3) City Council 27,400 430 27, 830 City Clerk 50,947 <1,800> 49,147 City Treasurer 5,401 <663> 4,738 City Attorney 70,000 <3, 110> 66,890 Special Legal 15,000 10,000 25,000 City Manager 151,340 2,770 154, 110 Personnel Admin. 71,603 71,603 Recruitments 3,450 3,450 Police 2,372,258 63,9139 2,436, 197 Fire 1,231,611 24,760 1,256,371 PW/Engineering 158, 185 13, 170 171,355 Recycling 2,225 2,225 Comm.Dev./Admin. 169,075 3,830 172,905 Planning 197,361 13,300 210,661 Comm.Dev./B1dg.Insp. 185, 120 <9, 880> 175,240 Code Enforcement 26,550 26,550 Comm.Serv./Admin. 62,613 1,900 64,513 Parks 299,946 <10,970> 288,976 Bldg. Maint. 189,517 800 190,317 Streets Maint. 57,705 <14,976> 42,729 Finance 223,007 7,9150 230,957 Risk Management 297,277 297,277 Equipment Replacement 55,475 55,475 Non-Departmental 470,700 <112,840> 357, 860 010001.19 Resolution No. 21-95 Exhibit A Page 2 - Revised 2/28/95 GENERAL FUND (CONTINUED ORIGINAL PROPOSED AMENDED BUDGET MIDYEAR BUDGET (3) Community Groups 10,225 10,225 Other Financing Uses 322,000(5) <129,000> 193,000 Net Expenditure Decrease $6,725,991 <140,390> $6,585,601 (4) The $45,000 Contingency amount would be included the General Fund' s Fund Balance at year-end if not utilized. (5) The original budgeted amount was understated by $5,000 due to a transfer from the General Fund for $40,000 to Recreation for $45, 000. This increase was offset by a decrease to the original budgeted contingency. Note: The $112,840 decrease in non-departmental results from a shift to the other departments to cover the items not originally budgeted for in the department. (ie, Gasoline & Oil, Communications, Postage & Freight) . In past years, these items were charged to non-departmental rather than the department. 0000, 0 RESOLOTION NO. 21-95 EXHIBIT A PAGE 3 PROPOSED ORIGINAL MID-YEAR AMENDED BUDGET AMENDMENTS BUDGET FUND• Wastewater: July 1, 1994 Fund Balance 507,292 54,601 561,893 Add Revenue 1, 132,912 <99,000>( 1) 1,033,912 Total Available 1,640,204 1,595,805 Less Operating Expense 1,057, 124 <243,,'450>(2 ) 813,674 Less Capital Expense 67,550 12,000 79,550 Less Contingency Reserve 60,000 <12,000> 48,000 June 30, 1995 Fund Balance $ 455,530 $ 654,581 (1) Loss of Investment Earnings Due to OCIP (2) Restructured Expenses Due to OCIP FUND• Sewer Facility: July 1, 1994 Fund Balance 1,843,821 7,893,1:554 9,737,375 Add Revenue 524, 100 <119,,000>( 1) 405, 100 Total Available 2,367,921 10, 142,475 Less Capital Projects 1,400,500 <738,:000>(2) 662,500 June 30, 1995 Fund Balance $ 967,421 $9,479,974 ( 1) Loss of Investment Earnings Due to OCIP (2) Assumes $50,000 Contingency Reserve will be Spent • 000031 RESOLUTION NO. 21-95 EXHIBIT A PAGE 4 PROPOSED ORIGINAL MID-YEAR AMENDED BUDGET AMENDMENTS BUDGET FUND• Aquatics• July 1, 1994 Fund Balance <3,835> <669> <4,504> Add Revenue 39,316 -0- 39,316 Total Available 35,481 34,812 Less Expenses 33,266 33,266 June 30, 1995 Fund Balance $ 2,215 $ 1,546 Notes; ( 1) Aquatics Revenue Decrease FUND: Lake Park Pavilion: July 1, 1994 Fund Balance <34,614> 1,754 <32,860> Add Revenue 41,580 <3,800>(1) 37,780 Total Available 6,966 4,920 Less Expenses 45,885 2,217(2) 48,377 June 30, 1995 Fund Balance $<38,919> $<43,457> Notes: ( 1) Lake Park Donation 200 Pavilion Food Consession <4,000> Net Revenue Decrease $<3,800> (2 ) Salaries & Benefits 717 Electricity Usage 1,500 Net Expenditure Increase $ 2,217 00003 RESOLUTION NO. 21-95 EXHIBIT A PAGE 5 - Revised 2/28/95 PROPOSED ORIGINAL MID-YEAR AMENDED BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS BUDGET FUND: Recreation: July 1, 1994 Fund Balance <31,280> <2,586> <33,866> Add Revenue 449,838 <2,000>( 1) 447,838 Total Available 418,558 413,972 Less Expenses 449,821 <2,002>(2) 447,819 June 30, 1995 Fund Balance $< 31,263> $< 33,847> Notes: ( 1) Adult Sports <5,000> Contract Classes <4,000> Special Events <1,000> Trips & Excursions <2,000> Youth Center - Masonic Bldg. 11,000 Recreation Rentals <1,Q00> Net Revenue Decrease <$2,000> (2) Recreation 4, 130 Special Events <1,350> Trips & Excursions <1,942> Youth Sports <7, 155> Youth Center - Masonic Bldg. 4,315 Net Expense Decrease $<2,002> FUND: Zoo Operations: July 1, 1994 Fund Balance <60,620> <28,382> <89, 002> Add Revenue 270, 150( 1) <38,000>(2) 232, 150 Total Available 209,530 143, 148 Less Expenses 271,459 509 271,968 June 30, 1995 Fund Balance $ <61,929> $<128,820> Notes: ( 1) Includes $50,000 transfer from General Fund (2 ) Zoo Admissions < 6,000> Donations <15,000> Proceeds - Sale of Fixed assets <17, 900> Net Revenue Decrease: $<38, 000> 000033 RESOLUTION NO. 21-95 EXHIBIT A PAGE 6 PROPOSED ORIGINAL MID-YEAR AMENDED BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS BUDGET FUND• Las Encinas Assessment District: July 1, 1994 Fund Balance 134,264 <8,933> 125,331 FUND: 3-F Meadows Assessment District: July 1, 1994 Fund Balance 70,459 11311 71,770 0000;34 RESOLUTION NO. 21-95 EXHIBIT A PAGE T' PROPOSED ORIGINAL MID-YEoAR AMENDED BUDGET ADJUS=NTS BUDGET FUND: Camino Real Assessment District July 1, 1994 Fund Balance 377,434 <59,940> 317,494 FUND: Amapoa-Tecorida-Azucena Fees: July 1, 1994 Fund Balance 223,845 3,232 227,077 Add Revenue 40,000 <11,780>( 1) 28,220 Total Available 263,845 255,297 Less Expenses 12,500 -0 12,500 June 30, 1995 Fund Balance $251,345 $242,797 Notes: ( 1) Loss of Investment Earnings due to OCIP. FUND: Wre Impact Fees: — July 1, 1994 Fund Balance 43,000 2,774, 45,774 Add Revenue 40,000 4,300,(1) 44,300 Total Available 83,000 90,074 Less Expenses 165,000 <120,700>(2) 44,300 June 30, 1995 Fund Balance $< 82,000> $45,774 Notes: ( 1) Investment Earnings <4,500> Other Rents & Concessions 8, 800e Net Revenue Increase $4,300'. (2) Transfer reduced due to OCIP. 0000;3,5 a RESOLUTION NO. 21-95 EXHIBIT A PAGE 8 PROPOSED ORIGINAL MID-YEAR AMENDED BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS BUDGET FUND: Drainage Impact Fees: July 1, 1994 Fund Balance 412,981 3,865 416,846 Add Revenue 68,000 <27,800>( 1) 40,200 Total Available 470,981 457,046 Less Expenses 135,400 <95,200>(2) 40,200 June 30, 1995 Fund Balance $335,581 $416,846 Notes: ( 1) Loss of Investment Earnings due to OCIP. (2) Transfers reduced due to OCIP FUND: Public Works Impact Fees: July 1, 1994 Fund Balance 415,700 6, 189 421,889 Add Revenue 115,000 <23,000>( 1) 92, 000 Total Available 530,700 513,889 Less Expenses 117,732 <25,732>(2) 92,000 June 30, 1995 Fund Balance $412,968 $421,889 NOTES• ( 1) Loss of Investment Earnings due to OCIP. (2) Transfers reduced due to OCIP. FUND• Assessment District #4 Redemption: July 1, 1994 Fund Balance 74,913 <5,202> 69,711 000036 RESOLUTION NO. 21-95 EXHIBIT A PAGE 9I. PROPOSED ORIGINAL MID-YEAR AMENDED BUDGET ADMUSNTS BUDGET FUND: Street Maintenance Districts: July 1, 1994 Fund Balance 46,224 685 46,909 Add Revenue 5, 100 <3,00'!0>(1) 2, 100 Total Available 51,324 49,009 Less Expenses 30,000 30,000 June 30, 1995 $21,324 $19,009 Notes: ( 1) Reduced Investment Earnings due to OCIP. FUND: Dial-A-Ride: July 1, 1994 Fund Balance <29,566> <43,253> <72,819> Add Revenue 474,713 <32,000>( 1) 442,713 Total Available 445, 147 369,894 Less Expenses 472,304 <61,050>(2) 411,254 June 30, 1995 Fund Balance $< 27, 157> $<41,360> Notes: ( 1) State Grant will not be received this fiscal year. 2 ) Transfers eliminated due to insufficient revenues FUND: TDA Non-Transit July 1, 1994 Fund Balance 136,000 1,235 134,765 Add Revenue 45,000 <2,O00> 43,000 Total Available 181,000 177,765 Less Expenses 180,368 <137,368>( 1) 43,000 June 30, 1994 Fund Balance $ 632 $134,765 Notes: ( 1) Transfers reduced due to OCIP. FUND: Gas Tax: July 1, 1994 Fund Balance 64,226 <3,477> 60,749 Add Revenue 439, 000 -0- 439,000 Total Available 503,226 499,749 Less Expenses 512,655 <30,960>( 1) 485,695 June 30, 1995 Fund Balance $ <9,429> $14,054 ( 1) Includes a $24, 000 Contingency decrease. 000037 RESOLUTION NO. 21-95 EXHIBIT A PAGE 10 PROPOSED ORIGINAL MID-YEAR AMENDED BUDGET AMENDMENTS BUDGET FUND: Tree Planting Trust: July 1, 1994 Fund Balance 31,649 < 187> 31,462 Add Revenue 4,100 1,911 6,011 Total Available 35,749 37,473 Less Expenses 31,800 <24,500>( 1) 7,300 June 30, 1995 Fund Balance $ 3,949 $30, 173 ( 1) Transfers reduced due to OCIP. FUND• Sidewalk Trust Fund: July 1, 1994 Fund Balance 45,184 679 45,873 Add Revenue 2,500 2,500( 1) 5,000 Total Available 47,684 50,873 Less Expenses -0- -0- June 30, 1995 Fund Balance $47,684 $50,873 Notes• ( 1) Increased Revenues from State and Donations. 000038 RESOLUTION NO. 21-95 EXHIBIT A PAGE 1-Revised 2/28/95 PROPOSED 40ORIGINAL MID-YEAR AMENDED BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS BUDGET FUND: Parks & Recreation Impact Fees: July 1, 1994 Fund Balance <185,000> 500 <184,496> FUND: Emergency Services: July 1, 1994 Fund Balance 9,044 58 9,102 FUND: Weed Abatement: July 1, 1994 Fund Balance 28,902 <17,221> 11,681 FUND: A.D. #3 - Marchant July 1, 1994 Fund Balance 9,331 <28,766> <19,435> FUND: A.D. •#5 Chandler: July 1, 1994 Fund Balance 44,759 196 44,955 &MD: A.D.#6 Camino Real July 1, 1994 Fund Balance 79,097 2,220 81,317 FUND: A.D. • #7 1992 Streets: July 1, 1994 Fund Balance 65,992 <1,043> 64,949 FUND: C.O.P. Debt Service: July 1, 1994 Fund Balance 138,853 146,913 285,266 Add Revenues 195,500 <45,000>( 1) 184,500 Total Available 334,353 469,766 Less Expenses 198,500 198,500 June 30, 1995 Fund Balance $135,853 $271,266 ( 1) Decrease investment earnings from OCIP. Decreased revenue transfers from Police Impact Fees Fund. 00009 RESOLUTION 21-95 EXHIBIT A PAGE 12 PROPOSED ORIGINAL MID-YEAR AMENDED BUDGET AMENDMENTS BUDGET FUND• Police Impact Fees: July 1, 1994 Fund Balance <119,317> <27,500> <146,817> Revenue 25,000 <4,000> 21,000 Total Available 94,317 <125,817> Less Expenses 55,000 <34,000>( 1) 21,000 June 30, 1995 Fund Balance $<149,317> $<125,817> ( 1) Reduced x-fers due to lack of sufficient revenues. FUND• Police Training: July 1, 1994 Fund Balance <3,543> 655 < 2,888> Add Revenue 20,000 20,000 Total Available 16,457 17, 112 Less Expenses 20,000 20,000 June 30, 1995 Fund Balance $<3,543> $<2,888> 0000,10 RESOLOTION NO. 21-95 EXHIBIT A PAGE 13 - Revised 3/1/95 PROPOSED ORIGINAL MID-YEAR AMENDED BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS BUDGET FUND: Capital Projects: July 1, 1994 Fund Balance <261,486> 156,II,144 <105,342> Add Funding Sources 1,572,208 <757,!,470>( 1) 814,738 Total Available 1,310,722 709,396 Less Funding Uses 1,552,208 <739,566>( 1) 812,642 June 30, 1995 Fund Balance $< 241,486> $<103,246> Notes: ( 1) Insufficient Fund Transfers unable to occur due to OCIP. See attached Capital Projects Matrixes. amid-year #43 000041 1 47 o 0000���� o a r 000,044 e RESOLUTION NO. 21-95 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA MAKING THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO RESOLUTION NO. 85-94 THE ADOPTED 1994-95 FISCAL YEAR BUDGET NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the ,City Council of the City of Atascadero that the Fiscal Year 1994-95 Budget is amended as follows: SECTION 1 . Fund Balances, Revenue and Expense amounts are adjusted by the amounts shown in Exhibit "A", made a part of this resolution. SECTION 2. These changes are effective immediately upon adoption of this resolution. On motion by Councilperson and seconded by Councilperson , the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll-call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ADOPTED: CITY OF ATASCADERO By: R. DAVID BEWLEY, Mayor ATTEST: LEE PRICE, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ARTHER R. MONTANDON, City Attorney APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: BRADFORD WHITTY, Finance Director 000045 i 1 REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL Oeeting Date : 3/1?/9� CITY OF ATASCADERO jAgenda Item: A-10 Through : Andy Takata. City Manager From: Bradford Whitty, Finance Director,- SUBJECT: irectorSUBJECT: Designation of City Representatives lauthorized to execute State Office of Emergencv (OES ) documents for financial assistance . RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends City Council adopt ResO ution -9$ . designating City representatives authorised to execute State OHS documents for certain financial assistance . BACKGROUND: Tle t'itymust aui prize certain in i.�- du}� iti to execute applications and other administrative documents for the purpose of obtaining certain federai finanoiai assistance ander P. L . 93-18�-' as amen-ded- nv - tne Robert T. Stafford Disaster Re ief and Emergencv Assistance At of 1954 . and . he Narurai Disaster- :assistance Act . DISCUSSION: For purposes of hand, ina the administrativec.;ocumentation and federal /state financial assistance . the inj-- � duals recognized on Fesoiution -95 are re3!commended for autnori_ zina stated documentation . i i i I a 000045,/ RESOLUTION NO. 27-95 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING CERTAIN CITY REPRESENTATIVES TO EXECUTE STATE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES DOCUMENTS FOR CERTAIN FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Atascadero must designate certain City representatives to execute assurances and agreements pursuant to the laws of the State of California. Office of Emergency Services ; and WHEREAS, The City' s primary designee shall be the Finance Director . with alternates being the Emergency Services Coordinator . and City Manager ; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the following named individuals shown on the attached OES Form 130 . are hereby authorized to execute for , and in behalf of . the City of Atscadero . a public entity established under the taws of the State of California. appiications and documents for purposes of obtaining certain Tederai financial assistance Under P . L . 93-288 as amended by the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act of 1958 and/or state financia:i a-ssistance- under the Natural Disaster .assistance act . PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the i`_ tv Of Atascadero held on the 14th of March . 199D . ATTEST: CITY OF ATASCADEfO V, By: LEE PRIG=:^ , City Clerk R. DAVID BEWLEY, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM : afi ':E^ fO ; aNnCi:� ; ty i t rorne -00.00.45.2- . State of California Disaster Number OFFICE OF Federal PA Number EMERGENCY SERVICES State Application Number DESIGNATION OF APPLICANT'S AGENT RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED BY THE OF THE (Board of Daectors or Governing Body) (Name of Organization) - THAT (Name of Designated Agent) (Title) OR (Nance of Designated Agent) (Title) OR (Mame of Designated Agent) (Title) is hereby authorized to execute for and in behalf of the a public entity Marne o rganzation established under the laws of the State of California, this application and to file it in the Office of Emergency Services for the purpose of obtaining certain federal financial assistance under P.L. 93-288 as amended by the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and;Emergency Assistance Act of 1988, and/or state financial assistance under the Natural Disaster Assistance Act for , which occurred in of (Fire.Food,Earpiouake.etc.? IMtxitnlOa[els IVearl THAT the � ame oganwnom a public entity established under the laws of the State of - California, hereby authorizes its agent to provide to the State Office of emergency services for all matters pertaining to such state disaster assistance the assurances and agreements required. Passed and approved this day of 19 �— i Dorn can 10 fName and Title of Approving Bosrd or CouncilWemOerl (Name and Title of Aovroving Board or Counal Memberl (Name and Title of Avorowng Board Or Council Member? i CERTIFICATION (Name) duly appointed and of (Title Of Clerk or Certifying ONitiaU /Name of OrpanvatiorU do hereby certify that the above is a true and correct copy of a resolution passed and approved by the of the (Board of Directors or Governing Body) on the day of 19 (Name of Organzatwn) (Date) (Month) (Year) Date: (Clerk or Cenitying ONieiall 3ES Fom+130(Rev BfSA)DAB Form (Signature) (n�/(��!!�� Q 19 11 3 45.3 REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Xitem: B-1(A) Through: Andrew J. Takata Meeting Date: 03/14/95 City Manager File Number: GPA #94001 From: Henry Engen Community Development Director a SUBJECT: Consideration of an amendment of the Circulation lilement of the Generastreetltolau n n collector tstreetlg nation(BereanBaptfEl Bsortd�-f-rom a "local" hurch) RECOMMENDATION: i 1. Resolution No. 22-95 - Approve attached Resolution amending the Circulation Element by changing the roadclassification of E1 Bordo Avenue from a "local" to a "colldctor" street. BACKGROUND: On February 21, 1995, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the above-referenced subject. After discussion (see attached Minutes excerpts) , the Planning commission recommended approval of General Plan Amendment #94001 on a 6: 1, vote. HE:ph I Encls: Planning Commission Staff Report - 2/21/!95 Planning Commission Minutes Excerpts - 2/21/95 Resolution No. 22-95 cc: Greg Peterson a i I a 1 0000116 I CITY OF ATASCADERO STAFF REPORT Item: B. 1 FOR: PlanningCommission sion MEETING DATE: 2-21-95 BY: P# Steven L. DeCamp, City Planner FILE NO: GPA 94-001 SUBJECT- Amendment of the Circulation Element of the General Plan to change the designation of El Bordo from a "local" street to a "collector" street . RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Commission take the following actions: 1 . Find the draft Negative Declaration prepared for this project to be adequate . 2 . Recommend that the City Council adopt the attached draft Resolution amending the Circulation Element by changing the road classification of E1 Bordo Avenue from a "local" to a "collector" street . SITUATION AND FACTS: 1 . Applicant . . . . . . . . . . . . .Berean Baptist Church 2 . Representative. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Greg Peterson 3 . Project Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . .El Bordo Avenue 4 . General Plan Designation. . . . . "Local" Street 5 . Existing Use. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .City Maintained Street 6 . Environmental Status . . . . . . . . .Negative Declaration posted January 20, 1995 BACKGROUND: The Berean Baptist Church has developed plans for the expansion of their facility located at the intersection of El Bordo and Las Lomas Avenues . The church' s site is, however, considered to be non-conforming because the property is located on a "local" street . In order to process a Conditional Use Permit for an expansion of the church' s facilities, it must be located on a "collector" street . An application has, therefore, been submitted to change the Circulation Element' s designation of E1 Bordo to a "collector" street . 000OL1 ' STAFF REPORT February 21, 1995 GPA 94-001 Page 2 (Berean Baptist Church) ANALYSIS: The Circulation Element provides a classif.icationscheme for the streets within the City. This scheme results in a hierarchy of adequately sized streets to meet anticipated traffic levels . Assignment of streets to the various classifications is based on the role played by the particular road. E1 Bordo ''Avenue is currently classified as a "local" street . The Circulation Element defines a local street as follows : Local Streets. Local streets have the sole function of providing access to adjoining land uses. "Local" streets are the lowest of the road classifications contained within the Circulation Element' s . The next step up on the classification system is the "collector" street . The Circulation Element defines this class of streets as follows : Collectors. Collectors have the important function of collecting traffic from residential or commercial areas and channeling it to arterials. They are typically fronted by residences, commercial or public activities. ,' They are usually two lane streets, and maximum acceptable volumes are often dictated by resident concerns about intrusion rather than traffic capacity considerations. In addition to " . . .collecting traffic . . . " from various land uses and conveying it to arterial streets as noted in the definition, collector streets also distribute traffic from the arterials to the different land uses people wish to visit . El Bordo Avenue provides access to a wide variety of planned and existing land uses . As depicted of the Land Use Plan Map (see Attachment C) , El Bordo Avenue abuts Low Density Single Family, High Density Multiple Family, Neighborhood Commercial, and Public land uses . It is, perhaps, these public uses that generate the highest volume of traffic on El Bordo. In addition to the Berean Baptist Church, El Bordo serves Heilman Regional park and the Chalk Mountain Golf Course. These latter two uses place significant demands on E1 Bordo . _ The variety of land uses served by El Bordo, and the existing and anticipated traffic demands placed on the street by the two major regional uses argue for a "collector" classification for this 000048 STAFF REPORT February 21, 1995 GPA 94-001 Page 3 (Berean Baptist Church) street . Future improvements planned for this road should anticipate the higher traffic volumes generated by the Park, Golf Course, and the multiple family zoning. A. "collector" classification better represents this street function and role than does the existing "local" street classification. CONCLUSIONS: E1 Bordo Avenue currently serves a wide variety of land uses, several of which generate high volumes of traffic. In order to adequately anticipate future improvement needs, E1 Bordo should be classified as a "collector" street . This classification will ensure that adequate pavement width and provisions for pedestrian traffic will be incorporated into future road improvement plans . ATTACHMENTS : Attachment A - Draft Negative Declaration Attachment B - Circulation Plan Attachment C - Land Use Map Attachment D - Draft Resolution 000,19 ATTACHMENT A CITY OF ATASCADERO ENVIRONMENTAL COORDINATOR NEGATIVE DECLARATION COMMUNTIY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 6500 PALMA AVE. ATASCADERO. CAF 93422 (805) 461-5035 APPLICANT: Berean Baptist Church Attn: Greg Pererson 9325 El Bordo Ave. Atascadero, CA 93422 PROJECT TITLE: Circulation Element Amendment (GPA 94-001) 1 PROJECT LOCATION: El Bordo Avenue from El Camino Real to Heilman Park and Chalk Mtn. Golf Course PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Amendment to the Circulation Element of the City' s General Plan to change the classification of El Bordo Avenue from a "local" street to a "collector" street. FINDINGS: 1. The project does not have the potential to degrade the environment. is2. The project will not achieve short-term to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals. 3. The project does not have impacts which are individually limited,but comulatively considerable. 4. The project will not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings either directly or indirectly. DETERMINATION: Based on the above findings, and the information contained in the initial study(made a part hereof by refer- ence and on file in the Community Development Department), it has been determined that the above project will not have an adverse impact on the environment. Henry Engen Community Development Director Date Posted: /• Z-5 - 9 5- Date Date Adopted: • cm x,-89 OOOODO \' CITY OF ATASCADERO ATTACHMENT B 4-001 A, ' "" COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT GPA 9latio � Circulation Plan DEPARTMENT (Berean Baptist Churc}� ---- -_- __-__ �oTEMPLETON _ Ruz R \ yP Special �a \ Study o RD. Area#2 `"•a''D gi RD. San BErO R�• - y� �o s '�'�=>`?:Stud >`•.> ;K'. �P y ti • 0 1 N W. SAN Area#1 A P �♦ 4 5 5•�\ P a G ti > • \L 1 O 7i 2 N • > 2 1 S RD. 5 iia a PG P > cuF5 - ° \ CA A910 avE o `\ ROSa . FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION ti, 4 t� Freeway Major Arterial(4 lanes unless otherwise noted) Minor Arterial(2 lanes unless otherwise noted) —� Collector(2 lanes) j o I ----- Future Road Extension i NOTE: Streets not shown are classified as local streets. P \\ Figure 111-3Baa9aRa CIRCULATION PLAN 000051 ATTACHMENT C CITY OF ATASCADERO GIA 94-001 ts COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Land use Plan Map DEPARTMENT (Berean Baptist Church) Ttc MF•4Q61 G�kA�- rL+-tN Coo rt RSF (P07) tt oo ,p4 �?or)� -RSF•Z(PD7) q- , l 1 N , ;v CT P � fes CN ,1 4.74" ' C R s } _ AVE- X ti R S - Cop f 000052 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES EXCERPTS 2/21/95 CITY OF ATASCADERO PLANNING COMMISSION 2/21/95 ACTION MINUTES SUBJECT: B. HEARINGS, APPEARANCES, AND REPORTS 1. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT #94001: Amendment of the Circulation Element of the General Plan to change the designation of El Bordo from a "local" street to a "collector" street. (Berean Baptist Church) (Greg Peterson) . STAFF RECOMMENDATION: (Decamp) Staff recommends-that-bhe- Commission-take the fol-low-Ing actions: 1. Find the draft Negative Declaration prepared for this project to be adequate. 2 . Recommend that the City Council adopt the attached draft Resolution amending the Circulation Element by changing the road classification of El Bordo Avenue from a "local" to a "collector" street. TESTIMONY: Greg Peterson, applicant's representative offered to answer questions. Verna Barnhill, 9375 E1 Bordo, had questions about the difference between a "collector" and a "local" street. She also wanted to know what impact this change would have on her, as a property owner on this street. Mr. Decamp explained the difference in street types and indicated that property owners right now who have developed lots would not be expected, at the presant time, to bring their portion of the street up to any different standard than what exists now. Mike Edmonds, 9385 El Bordo, wanted to know how this change would impact the existing property owners (i.e. , would there be a cost imposed on them to upgrade with curbs and gutters) . Mr. DeCamp reiterated that there would be no requirement for any of the property along El Bordo to change their frontage or to expend any money at all on the road unless there is a development project, such as the church has proposed. Mr. Edmonds wanted to know if at some point in the future, the City could require them to upgrade at their expense. Mr. Johnson explained that, as it becomes necessary and if the City has money to budget for that, then the City could build it out. Mr. Edmonds expressed concern about the speed at which vehicles travel on E1 Bordo. He was referred to the City's Traffic Committee, which is responsible for establishing posted speed limits. (Page 3 of 12) 000053 Planning Commission Meeting, February 21, 1995 • George Sullivan, a resident of Santa Margarita and', a member of the Berean Baptist Church, said that he would hate to think that if the property be damaged to the extent that a rebuild would be required, the church could not be reconstructed because of its non-conforming use and that in its place another apartment complex would be built. He felt that the public would be best served by having the church in the community. ACTION: A motion was made to find the draft Negative Declaration prepared for this project to be adequate. Motion: Miller Second: Messer AYES: Miller, Messer, Bonnema, Bowen, Edwards, Wallace Johnson NOES: None ABSENT: None A motion was made to recommend that the City Council adopt the attached draft Resolution amending the Circulation Element by . changing the road classification of El Bordo. Avenue from a "local" to a "collector" street. Motion: Miller Second: Messer AYES: Miller, Messer, Bonnema, Bowen, Wallace, Johnson NOES: Edwards ABSENT: None GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT #94005/ZONE CHANGE #94006: equest to include the subject property within the Urban Se ces Li (USL) , change the Land Use designation from uburban Reside ial to Moderate Density Single Family Res ' ential, and change th Zoning Map from Residential Suburb (RS) to RSF-Y (Residential ngle Family - one acre mi ' um lot size with sewer, one an one-half acre wit sewer available. ) (Pentecostal Church o God) (Cannon ociates) . ;' Subject site is located at 3555 E1 Camin eal. (Page 4 of 000 54 EXHIBIT D • RESOLUTION NO. 22-95 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CIRCULATION ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN REGARDING EL BORDO AVENUE (GPA 94-001; Berean Baptist Church) WHEREAS, the City of Atascadero has grown considerably since incorporation; and WHEREAS, the City' s General Plan Circulation Element, which was adopted in 1993 to guide the City' s planning and budgeting for circulation improvements is in need of revision; and WHEREAS; the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero conducted a public hearing on the subject amendments on February 21, 1995; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65356 provides that a General Plan be amended by the adoption of a resolution; and WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Atascadero finds as . follows : 1 . The proposed General Plan amendment recommended by the Planning Commission is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan. 2 . The proposed General Plan amendment will not have a significant adverse affect on the environment . The Negative Declaration prepared for the project is adequate. NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Atascadero does resolve to approve General Plan Amendment 94-001 as follows : 1 . Amendment to the Circulation Plan (Figure III-3) of the Circulation Element of the General Plan as shown on the attached Exhibit A. 000055 Resolution No. 22-95 Page 2 On motion by and seconded by the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety by the following roll call vote: AYES : NOES : ABSENT: ADOPTED : CITY OF ATASCADERO, CA By: R. DAVID BE LEY, Mayor ATTEST: e LEE PRICE, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ARTHER R. MONTANDON, City Attorney PREPARED BY: HENRY ENGEN, Community Development Director 000056 4 RESOLUTION NO. EXHIBLT_A Page 1 of 1 To TEMPLETON $AN rA RUZ r4 7- Speclal Study Area#2 efto LUL RD. 0, := I--, SAN 8EN"O ............. .................... X Ro. -.......... r S S tUdy SAN C, C 0,, RD. 05 00- L11A AVE 0 las 'POSA 4 FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION Freeway Major Arterial(4 lanes unless otherwise noted) F---J Minor Arterial(2 lanes unless otherwise noted) Collector(2 lanes) Future Road Extension NOTE: Streets not shown are classified as local streets. Figure 111-3 SAR&A CIRCULATION PLAN 000057 1 7 REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item: B-1(B) Through: Andrew J. Takata Meeting Date: 03/14/95 City Manager File Nuuber: GPA #94003 ,'t ZC #94004 From: Henry EngenL Community Development Director SUBJECT: Consideration of General Plan and Zoning Ordinance] map amendments to change -the--Land-utse---des-ignation of certain real] property from "Low Density Single Family" to "Tourist Commercial" and change the Zoning Map accordingly from RSF-Z to CT. Subct site is located at 6000 San Palo Road. (Richard and Sand; Summers) "s RECOMMENDATION• 1. Resolution No. 13-95 - Approve attached Resolution amending the Land Use Plan Map of the General Plan. 2. Ordinance No. 285 - Read by title only and approve on first reading amending the Zoning Map from RSF-Z toolCT. BACKGROUND: i , On February 21, 1995, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the above-referenced subject. After di1scussion (see attached Minutes excerpts) , the Planning Commission recommended approval of General Plan Amendment #94003 and Zones Change #94004 on a 7:0 vote. i j HE:ph I Encls: Planning Commission Staff Report - 2/21/195 Planning Commission Minutes Excerpts - 21/21/95 Resolution No. 13-95 Ordinance No. 285 i cc: Richard and Sandra Summers { j j 000058 CITY OF ATASCADERO Item: B. 3 STAFF REPORT FOR. Planning Commission Meeting Date. February 21, 1995 BY: Gary Kaiser, Associate Planner Gy— File No: GPA #94003 ZC #94004 SUBJECT: Consideration of General Plan Amendment request to change the land use designation of certain real property from "Low Density Single Family" to "Tourist Commercial. A Zone Change is also being requested to change the zoning of the site accordingly (from RSF-Z to CT) . RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission should recommend to the City Council the following actions: 1. That the Negative Declaration prepared for the project be found adequate under the requirements of California' s Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) ; 2. That General Plan Amendment #94003 be approved based on the Findings contained in the Draft Resolution (Attachment F) ; and 3. That Zone Change #94004 be approved based on the Findings and contained in the Draft Ordinance (Attachment G) . SITUATION AND FACTS: 1. Applicant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Richard and Sandra Summers 2. Project Address. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6000 San Palo Road 3. Legal Description. . . . . . . . . . . . .Ptn of Lts 1 & 2, Blk 2, AC 4. Site Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4.02 acres 5. Existing Use. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Vacant 6. Environmental Status. . . . . . . . . .Negative Declaration posted January 31, 1995 1 0000 ANALYSIS: • The project is a request that both the General Plan' s n s Land Use Map and Official Zoning Map be changed relative to certain real property located at 6000 San Palo Road (Attachments A & B) . As shown by Attachments A' & B, -the site is presently designated for Low Density Single Family use by the General Plan and is zoned RSF-Y (Residential Single Family, low density) . These Attachments also show the General Plan designationl' and zoning of lands surrounding the project site. As shown, thel' site abuts single family residential properties to the south and east, Highway 101 to the north and Tourist Commercial lands to the west, between the site and San Anselmo Road. If the project is approved, the General Plan and Zoning Maps would be changed so that the existing Tourist Commercial area west of the site is enlarged to encompass -the subject site. History Under the 1980 General Plan, the site was designated for Low Density Single Family Residential use -- the same designation as that shown by today' s General Plan. In 1984, the general Plan designation and zoning of the property was changed to Tourist Commercial -- the same designation as that proposed today. The site was thought less than desirable for residential purposes because of slope, the lack of public sewer and proximity to Highway 101. Even without public sewer being available, the site seemed well-suited for Tourist Commercial use with '' its location on a freeway frontage portion of San Palo Road neat the San Anselmo overpass. Thus, the Tourist , Commercial designation remained until the adoption of a City-wide General ' Plan Update in 1992. As of 1992, sewer service remained unavailable to the area and it looked as though a low density residential designation would be most realistic. Recent Changes Since the adoption of the 1992 General Plan Update, In-N-Out Burger has moved into the project area and, in the ;process, has extended sewer across Highway 101. A new sewer main -- oversized to accommodate future commercial development -- now exists across the frontage of the subject site. The City' s Wastewater Operations Division has confirmed that the subject property now has easy access to public sewer. Environmental Review Whether the site is developed for residential or commercial use, there would be a certain amount of grading and vegetation removal required. In addition, there would be increases in traffic and • surface runoff. With its location along a freeway 'frontage road 2 a 000060 t yet abutting residential areas, the site is visually and socially sensitive. In other words, the appearance of future development on the site is an important consideration as is ensuring that design features successfully avoid or mitigate any increases in traffic, noise and lighting. As of now, no development plans have been received for the property. Absent a specific development plan, it is difficult at best to quantify potential impacts and determine appropriate mitigation. Whether residential or commercial, any future plans to develop the site must undergo separate environmental review. Therefore, staff does not see a potential that the mapping changes now being proposed would lead to significant effects on the environment in the future as any impacts can and would be mitigated. A draft Negative Declaration has therefore been prepared (Attachment C) . Fiscal Impact It has become common knowledge that, in general, commercial development is more of a fiscal benefit to the City than is residential development. Nonetheless, the fiscal impact model was used to assess the effect of the. proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Change on the City' s general fund. A graph. showing buildout under the existing zoning is contained in Attachment D. Here, the construction of three (3) single family residences was assumed as there are three (3) legal lots involved. The shaded bars represent general fund expenditures; the solid bars represent general fund revenues. As the costs to the City continue to rise (costs of providing road maintenance, police & fire protection, etc. ) , revenues (property tax) remain fixed. Buildout under the existing residential designation would therefore end up costing the City in about 13 years. Another graph showing possible buildout of the site under the proposed CT zoning is contained in Attachment E. Here, it was assumed the site would contain a 6, 000 square-foot restaurant with 100 seats. As the graph shows, general fund revenues (which now include sales tax) would far exceed costs for the foreseeable future. CONCLUSIONS• The subject General Plan Amendment and corresponding Zone Change is essentially a request that the City-wide General Plan Update of 1992 be reconsidered in light of new information (availability of sewer service) . Indeed, if staff had known of the imminent availability of sewer service the pre-existing Tourist Commercial designation would not have been recommended for change. 3 • 000061 The proposed Amendments would trigger no internal inconsistencies within the text of the General Plan or Zoning Ordinance nor do they have the potential to adversely effect the environment in a significant way. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A - Location Map (General Plan) Attachment B - Location Map (Zoning) Attachment C - Negative Declaration Attachment D - Fiscal Impact (Existing Zoning) Attachment E - Fiscal Impact (CT Zoning) Attachment F - Draft Resolution No. 13-95 Attachment G - Draft Ordinance No. 285 GPA94003/ZC94004.sr 4 000062 P .��' • 111 ' ` • • • ` � LbIP dw all Big Kam~ SS • :LCI i'' AND H11.11��1 LI �W �'� � • gum1 • ' it IBM Pig Boom ����1�I��d I�IIii�U►',Il�ii ATTACHMENT C CITY OF ATASCADERO GPAA#94003ECATZCR#94004 . .w► a 6000 SAN PALO ROAD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ' DEPARTMENT CITY OF ATASCADERO ENVIRONMENTAL COORDINATOR NEGATIVE DECLARATION COWAUNI Y DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 6500 PAIANIA AVE. ATASCADERO.CA 93422 (805)461-5035 APPLICANT: R�ce+an2D ,.»+2a `�r�ir-lES2 S &--f:Psc.a-�D 6,?_o, PROJECT TITLE: PROJECT LOCATION: foo p So, l t�A�o Pz—,A-t7 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: CtiAct--4E U�b USE DES1��-T�o� �r•�iiJ� � 'T}-1E ��TE f-t��N1 l�c.J- 1��>�5�i�-t 512- �b Toui?�t.st- C�tfit��c.c�-� . FINDINGS: 1. The project does not have the potential to degrade the environment. 2. The project will not achieve short-term to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals. 3. The project does not have impacts which are individually limited.but comulattvely considerable. 4. The project will not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings either directly or indirectly. DETERMINATION: Based on the above findings.and the information contained in the initial study(made a part hereof by refer- ence and on file in the Community Development Department).it has been determined that the above project will not have an adverse impact on the environment. Henry Engen Community Development Director Date Posted: TAA-t. 3 t ) tgCts Date Adopted: OC)OOGS ATTACHMENT D FISCAL IMPACT (EX. ZONE) CITY OF ATASCADERO GFA 494003; ZC 494004 � p 6600 SAN PALO ROAD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT �0 DEPARTMENT General Fund Revenue vs. Expenditures All figures in Current dollars $12 $10 - $8 - $6 - $4 - $2 10$8$6$4$2 $0 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 '' 2011 2013 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 Year i = Operating Expenses = Revenues s i � ®000GO6 i ATTACHMENT E FISCAL PAZONE) / OF ATASCADERO GPA 9400 • 6000 SAN PALO ROAD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT w• DEPARTMENT General • R- dollars $25 i i i 19951997 1999 200 1 200311 1 / 1 /9 20 1 1 20 13 • • • 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 Year 0 PLAa'NNING COMMISSION MINaUTES EXCERPTS - 2/21/95 lanning Commission Meeting, February 21, 1995 Serve es Line, as well. Mr. Plotkin does, however, support the cha ge even i it does not include the other requested properties. ACTION: A motion as made to find the Negative Declaration p epared for the projec to be adequate under the provisions of t e California Environmenta Quality Act (CEQA) . Motion: Johnso Second: Edwards AYES: Johnson, dwards, Wallace, Mes er, Bonnema, Bowen, Miller NOES: None- ABSENT: None A motion was made to approve olution 111-95, including the subject property within the US d changing the Land Use designation from Suburban Resident 1 to Moderate Density Single Family Residential. Motion: Edwards Second: Wallace AYES: Edwards, llace, Messer, Bonne a, *Bowen, Miller, Johnson NOES: None ABSENT: None A motion w s made to approve Ordinance #284, changing a Zoning designat' on of the subject property from RS to SF-Y. Motio : Edwards Sec d: Bonnema A S: Edwards, Bonnema, Wallace, Messer, ', Bowen, Miller, Johnson NOES: None ABSENT: None 3 . GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT #94003/ZONE CHANGE #94004: Request to change the land use designation of certain real property from "Low Density Single Family" to "Tourist Commercial. " A Zone Change is also being requested to change the zoning of the site accordingly (from RSF-Z to CT) . (Richard and Sandra Summers) . Subject site is located at 6000 San Palo Road. . (Page 6 of 12) 0Q00cs i Planning Commission Meeting, February 21, 1995 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: (Kaiser) The Planning Commission should, recommend to the City Council the following actions: 1. That the Negative Declaration prepared. for the project be found adequate under the requirements of California's Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) ; 2 . That General Plan Amendment #94003 be approved based on the Findings contained in the Draft Resolution (Attachment F) ; and 3 . That Zone Change #94004 be approved based on the Findings contained in the Draft Ordinance (Attachment G) . TESTIMONY: Richard Summers, 5340 Magnolia, Atascadero, the applicant commented that the staff findings adequately portray the history of the property. He proposed that few (4) residential properties would be impacted by this change because this property is oriented toward the freeway and 2 of the 4 acres on the lot consist of a steep slope. He added that the history of this property relative to the sewer is very germane because, at a time when the owners felt they could develop the property (during the 70's and 801s) there was no sewer available to that property and was so expensive that none of the developers wanted to touch it. With the surrounding zoning being changed, very few people want to build a home on the freeway. Consequently, the highest and best use for this property is Tourist Commercial because of its orientation to the freeway and good access to the property. Sheila McMillan, 4060 Logato Avenue, Atascadero, which is one of the four parcels at the top of the hill overlooking this property. As a representative of the residents of the three new homes build on this hill, she expressed concern about increased traffic and the impact on the animals and vegetation in the area. She indicated that there have already been more accidents in the area with the increased traffic from the In and Out Burger operation. ACTION: A motion was made to recommend to the City Council that the Negative Declaration prepared for the project be found adequate under the requirements of California's Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) . (Page 7 of 12) OOOOC-1-9 Planning commission Meeting, February 21, 1995 Motion: Edwards Second: Wallace AYES: Edwards, Wallace,. Messer, Bonnema, '; Bowen, Miller, Johnson NOES: None ABSENT: None A motion was made to recommend to the City Council that General Plan Amendment #94003 be approved based on the Findings contained in the Draft Resolution (Attachment F) . Motion: ---Edwards - Second: Wallace AYES: Edwards, Wallace, Messer, Bonnema, Bowen, Miller, Johnson NOES: None ABSENT: None A motion was made to recommend to the City Council that Zone Change #94004 be approved based on the Findings contained in the Draft Ordinance (Attachment G) . is Motion: Edwards Second: Wallace AYES: Edwards, Wallace, Messer, Bonnema, Bowen, Miller, Johnson NOES: None ABSENT: None 4. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT #94004/ZONE CHANGE #9400,5: uest to change the land use designation of certain al prop ty from "Neighborhood Commercial" to 'Retail Com cial. " A Zone nge is also being requested to change'> z ing of the site accor ly (from CN to CR) . (Hawkins P]a Ltd. ) (Golden West Developme Subject site is located 9955 & 9965 E1 Camino Real. / STAFF RECOMMENDATION: (Kaiser) The Planning Commission should recommend t the City Council that General Plan Amendment.-#94004 and Zone Change # 0!� be denied based on the Findings i contained in Attachment F.'� (Page 8 of �" 0000,70 12 P .O. Box ill it Awry Engon, Giractoc Atascaanro Com&unity Dywalupwnt 6500 Palma Avenw? Atascader3, Ca , 53422 KEZ GPA 194003 ana ZC §9400d 0000 San Palo Rj , Azascad wro 2/21/95 Dear Mr . Engen ., 00, tne untecsi9n1j , Me iwwadiate neiOnDars ot tno O1: pe uncac consideration Ecr a zone cnange atov2 anj live at 55CA San palo Rj . an 30 nct newas6orily opows-2 wis wanga . out mra 7oncurnaa abouc Euturz� impocts w our lifs unless proper safnquDrds 3ca Aut in plauc aloa,� "ica the rezoning . We tnerefore suggwo you attacn H PU r2quicewwt to this razoning insuring that Ature we1l21opwent ill blend into this c2sidantial neiyhborhocd. �c dw vrw&nsr3 wu faise anim3is alici An, not bj compatiule wit;-I nanY us -S allo"al Onawr a C4 zoning , "e w0ulc 3PPr2ciate it if you jrnvinoG copies ot tnio latter to tW---, Womissioners and Ator"K wn� of cur wonacrns . TnanK you sincerely YQ"rs .' 16 Roo 000071 RESOLUTION NO. 13-95 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP BY REDESIGNATING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY AT 6000 STAN PALO ROAD FROM LOW DENSITY SINGLE FAMILY TO TOURIST COItiORCIAL (GPA #94003: Summers) WHEREAS, the City of Atascadero has grown considerably since incorporation; and WHEREAS, the City's General Plan, which was prepared in the 1970 ' s, adopted in 1980, and amended in 1992 to guide the City' s general growth is in need of updating; and WHEREAS; the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero conducted a public hearing on the subject amendment on February 21, 1995; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65356 providee that a General Plan be amended by the adoption of a resolution; and WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Atascadero finds as follows: 1. The proposed General Plan amendment recommended' by the Planning Commission is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan. 2. The proposed General Plan amendment will not have a significant adverse affect on the environment. The Negative Declaration prepared for the project is adequate. THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Atascadero does resolve to approve General Plan Amendment GPA #940013 as follows: 1. Amendment to the General Plan Land Use Element, Land Use Map as shown on the attached "Exhibit A" . On motion by and seconded by the foregoing resolution... is hereby adopted in its entirety by the following roll call vote: 000072 Resolution No. 13-95 Page 2 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: DATE ADOPTED: CITY OF ATASCADERO, CA R. DAVID BEWLEY, Mayor ATTEST: LEE PRICE, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: ANDREW J. TAKATA, City Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: ARTHER R. MONTANDON, City Attorney PREPARED BY: HENRY ENGEN, Community Development Director 0000'73 I/ � \ a WIN INS UP 'Jawill ago PIN 00- �$ rem �e lame ,�� �$ • AA 1 1p �� ORDINANCE NO. 285 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO AMENDING THE OFFICIAL CITY ZONING MAP BY REZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY AT 6000 SAN PALO ROAD FROM RSF-Z (RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY, LOW DENSITY) TO CT (COMMERCIAL TOURIST) (Zone Change #94004; Summers) WHEREAS, the proposed zoning text amendment proposes standards that are consistent with the General Plan as required by Section 65860 of the California Government Code; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendment-is in conformance with Section 65800 et seq of the California Government Code concerning zoning regulations; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendment does not have a potential to result in a significant adverse effect on the environment and the Negative Declaration prepared for the project is adequate; and WHEREAS, the Atascadero Planning Commission held a public hearing on February 21, 1995 and has recommended approval of Zone Change #94004. NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Atascadero does ordain as follows: Section 1. Council Findings. 1. The proposal is compatible with the surrounding land use and zoning designations. 2. The proposal is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Element. 3. The proposal will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts; the Negative Declaration prepared for the project is adequate. Section 2. Zoning Map. The City's Official Zoning Map is hereby amended to reclassify the parcel listed below and as shown on the attached Exhibit A which is hereby made a part of this ordinance by reference. APN 049-222-046: Ptn. of Lots 1 & 2, Block 2, AC 0000'75 Ordinance No. 285 Page 2 Section 3. Publication. The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published once within fifteen (15) days after its passage in '3the Atascadero News, a newspaper of general circulation, printed, ''published and circulated in the City in accordance with Section 36933 of the Government Code; shall certify the adopting and posting of this ordinance and shall cause this ordinance and this certification together with proof of posting to be entered into the Book of Ordinances of the City. Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall go into effect and be in full force and effect at 12: 01 a.m. on the 31st day after its passage. On motion by Councilperson i and seconded by Councilperson , the foregoing ordinance is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ADOPTED: CITY OF ATASCADERO By: R. DAVID BEWLEY, Mayor ATTEST: LEE PRICE, City Clerk 0000'76 i IPA nn►��� ���� � ��I1• Oil I j e I I REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item: B-1(C) Through: Andrew J. Takata Meeting pate: 03/14/95 City Manager File Numlber: GPA 94005 ZC ,94006 From: Henry Engen 4 Community Development Director i SUBJECT: Consideration of General Plan and Zoning Ordinance map amendments to include--the=subje�--property within the Urban Sor-vices Line (USL) , change the Land Use designation from Suburbjan Residential to Moderate Density Single Family Residential, an4 change the Zoning Map from Residential Suburban (RS) to RSF-Y (Residential Single Family - one acre minimum lot size with sewer, one and one-half acre without sewer available. ) Subject site is located at 3555 E1 Camino Real. (Pentecostal Church of God/Cannon Associates) . i RECOMMENDATION• 1. Resolution No. 11-95 - Approve attached Resolution amending the Land Use Plan Map of the General Plan. 2 . Ordinance No. 284 - Read by title only and ap' rove on first reading amending the Zoning Map from RS to RSF-Y. iii BACKGROUND: r On February 21, 1995, the Planning Commission condipcted a public hearing on the above-referenced subject. After diiscussion (see attached Minutes excerpt) , the Planning Commission] recommended approval of General Plan Amendment #94005 and Zonej Change 194006 on a 7: 0 vote. i 1 HE:ph i Encls: Planning Commission Staff Report - 2/21/95 Planning Commission Minutes Excerpts - 2/21/95 Resolution No. 11-95 Ordinance No. 284 i cc: Russell Thompson, Cannon Associates Clayton Cullen, Atascadero Pentecostal Church; of God i 1 00.00179 CITY OF ATASCADERO Item: B. 2 STAFF REPORT FOR: Planning Commission Meeting Date: February 21, 1995 BY: oug Davidson, Senior Planner File No: GPA 94005 W . ZC 94006 SUBJECT: Consideration of a General Plan Amendment to include the subject property within the Urban Services Line (USL) , change the Land Use designation from Suburban Residential to Moderate Density Single Family Residential, and change the Zoning Map from Residential Suburban (RS) to RSF-Y (Residential Single Family - one acre minimum lot size with sewer, one and one-half acre without sewer available. ) RECOMMENDATION• The Commission should make the following recommendations to the City Council: 1. Find the Negative Declaration prepared for the project to be adequate under the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act; and , 2. Approve Resolution #11-95, including the subject property within the USL and changing the Land Use designation from Suburban Residential to Moderate Density Single Family Residential; and, 3. Approve Ordinance #284, changing the Zoning designation of the subject property from RS to RSF-Y. SITUATION AND FACTS: 1. Applicant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Pentecostal Church of God 2. Representative. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Cannon Associates 3. Project Address. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3555 El Camino Real 4. Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .RS (Residential Suburban) 5. General Plan Designation. . . . . . . . . . . . .Suburban Residential 6. Existing Use. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Vacant 7 . Environmental Status. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Negative Declaration 1 000080 • BACKGROUND: Numerous applications have been filed on this property over the years. In 1982 a similar request to the current one was made to change the allowed density to Moderate Density Single Family. The Council, after defining a larger study area, denied the request. In 1983, a Precise Plan was approved for : the construction of a 7, 152 square foot church building. This approval was kept active until a revised pian submittal triggered a Conditional Use Permit. Conditional Use Permit 10-87 was subsequently denied because the relocation of the church to the rear of the property resulted in additional grading, inadequate access via a private road, and a greater impact upon surrounding residential uses. Shortly thereafter, the Precise Plan approval lapsed. The Precise Plan mirrored Tentative Parcel Map 21-85, an approved tentative map- for the division of this 5.24 acre lot into one 2.50 acre lot and one 2.74 acre lot. This map was never recorded and has since expired. Tentative Parcel Map 92011, submitted in late 1992, was ultimately deemed withdrawn for lack of percolation tests given the site' s location outside the Urban Services Line. The subject of the site' s relationship to the Urban Services Line deserves some further discussion. In 1977 the site was annexed into the Sewer Improvement District, which has since been incorporated into the Urban Services Line. The 1986 comprehensive revision to the Urban Services Line recognized this fact and maintained the subject parcel in the USL. 'l The 1992 Land Use Element resulted in the subject property being ,' excluded from the USL (see Attachment E) . The decision at that time was to draw the USL on the boundary of the existing one acre lots immediately to the south of the subject property. ANALYSIS• The analysis will focus on the potential impacts of extending the USL and the implications for the surrounding land use pattern. The site' s historical annexation and inclusion within the Urban Services Line, have anticipated the development of this property with sewer. The extension of sewer service to this site will not overburden the city' s sewer plant or collection system. Nor will the extension of sewer affect the serving of priority areas, particularly cease and desist areas. These are the two findings required by the General Plan in order to extend the USL. In conjunction with the USL extension, the applicant is requesting that the site' s density,. be increased from Residential Suburban to Moderate Density Single Family Residential. This change would allow for one acre parcels, as opposed to the current minimum lot size of 2 and 1/2 acres. The difference in 2 000081 potential new lots is probably two; two 2 1/2 acre lots under the current zoning served by a private driveway, versus 4 lots under the proposed zoning after the cul-de-sac for the right-of-way is subtracted. The surrounding properties are characterized by similar one acre residential parcels. Also, the large parcel (5+ acres) to the east has received tentative approval of a subdivision for 5 one acre lots. One acre parcels are compatible in this location and would maintain the staff recommendation contained in the General Plan Update of "no increase in density above the Moderate Single Family Residential designation. CONCLUSIONS: The northeast quadrant, specifically the east side of El Camino Real from San Anselmo north to Santa Cruz, has long been a topic of discussion. The established pattern of commercial land uses directly across. E1 Camino Rea-1 from s-uburban residential uses has resulted in several applications for increased residential density and some consideration of commercial land uses on the east side of El Camino Real. On the surface, the current request could be seen as a incremental lot-by-lot extension of urban services; an approach usually not associated with good land use planning. In this case, however, the site' s location and historical inclusion within the USL avoid an unwise "leapfrogging" of urban services. Further extension of urban services should not be done without a comprehensive area study. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A - General Plan Land Use Map Attachment B - Zoning Map Attachment C - Proposed Land Use/USL/Zoning Change Attachment D - Supplemental Development Statement Attachment E - Minutes Excerpt - General Plan Update (Sept. 17, 1991 Hearing - Map Attached) Attachment F - Negative Declaration Attachment G - Draft Resolution Attachment H - Draft Ordinance 3 000082 '°°m' gypped► � � :, �lfo Aoa ane � FAA Am owl, � RON , . cpGo I10 no a AID f; ATTACHMENT B CITY OF ATASCADERO ZONING MAP " — GPA 94005IZC 94006 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT �4 DEPARTMENT PIP ~� , t 0 0 � z 1 \N' N � W 0 � O\ FC JP ♦vE / 7 L � ✓ no 2 7L Try / ANgWLLA r `ip, XV L u } —y V a SILLA CaruC05 EL C°"A1^10 • GN j gEALbit i i pL i �q IS MNY 101 tid R04p •\ -ori` i ' , � j R��F `�� o, 2 a A A ,. 'i ' VENAD — ARiCOp��/ 0 - - / i 0O f4. ATTACHMENT C CITY OF ATASCADERO PROPOSED CHANGE r.��•r n COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT GPA g 4 0 o s/z c 94006 DEPARTMENT PROPOSED USL AND RSF-Y BOUNDRY LSF -X SUBJECT PARCEL 1 C RS PROPOSED USL AND ZONE ' CHANGE • slop.USL EXTENSION ASSOCIATES y t y n u G-PA - SUB . R ES . -to MDD. -DEWS IT SF ] C[1 on] Z C - RS -ro R S F -� � °' ATTACHMENT D • MICHAEL F. CANNON, PE ANDREW G. MERRIAM, AIA, AICP MDANIELS. HUTCHINSON, LS annOn ASSOCIATES September 30, 1994 formerly CSD Engineering,Inc. :. ENGINEERS Henry Engen, Community Development Director S " 3 ' 19ga Community Development Department CCt1 MUNJ jY PLANNERS City of Atascadero DEVELOPMENT 6500 Palma Ave SURVEYORS Atascadero, Ca 93422 RE: General Plan Amendment and Zone Change Request Atascadero Pentecostal Church of God Property, 5.24 Acres Lot 102,Block 19,A.C.,APN 49-163-033, El Camino Real, Atascadero Dear Mr. Engen: On behalf of the property owner and applicant, Atascadero Pentecostal Church of God, we request consideration of the following General Plan Amendment and Zoning Change application. Attached are several maps to clarify the request with respect to surrounding land uses. As you may remember the Church has owned and intended to develop theproperty • Y Y P since September 1980. Their plan, like the original owner Atascadero Bible Church, was to divide the property into two parcels, selling the rear parcel and then building their church on the front parcel. The project was to be served water by the Atascadero Mutual Water Company and sewer by the original Atascadero County Sanitary District. The previous owners diligently persued and processed the necessary applications to annex the property into the Sanitary District and Improvement District No. 1. In the years that followed the Pentecostal Church expended significant funds having engineering, land surveying, and architectural plans prepared based on developing the property in the same way as proposed by the previous owner, not to mention paying a premium price for the property based on the ability to connect to the City sewer. These plans were then put on hold until the Church was in a better financial situation to proceed with the project. In late 1991 the subject parcel was removed from the City's Urban Services Line for reasons which were directly contradictory to the LAFCO and Board of Supervisors analysis which resulted in the property's annexation to the Sanitary 364 PACIFIC STREET District in the first place. The Church was unaware of the detrimental effect it SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA would have on the development potential of the property, and more importantly 93401 the plans of building the Church. They now face the same severe limitation on the property(septic suitability)which prompted the 1977 annexation. They are now 805.544-7407 requesting the City to restore the economic viability of their property, in a FAx 805.544-3863 0000'86 ATTACHMENT D (CONT . ) laimion A S S O C I A T E S way which is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. ''',The Church is asking as part of this application that the fee for the requested 3revision to the USL to be waived (based on the repetition of processing caused by the City's removal of the property from the USL and Sanitary District). This property is immediately adjacent to the USL and the requested zoning is the same as on the adjacent property. Furthermore the property contiguous to the south has been developed into 1-acre parcels (CO 76411) and has completed one- half of a paved City cul-de-sac street which the Church parcel would share, eventually completing it to its full width. In this sense it becomes a request for "infill" type development as opposed to opening an area up to more intensive development. The property also fronts on the sewer main existing in El Camino Real. We feel these characteristics support approval of the following requested changes. The Church's request is first to return the property to withia� the Urban Services Line allowing the property to utilize City sewer. Namely moving the line one lot to the north, approximately 230 feet. Then, consistent with the existing development pattern in the immediate area, revise the current zoning from RS to RSF-Y allowing 1-acre parcels. The current Residential.Suburban zoning is out of character with development in this immediate area, specifically this parcel. Certainly the highest and best use of property adjacent to 1-acne parcels, and across the street from Commercial Retail zoning is not as a single large acreage rural parcel. Furthermore the infrastructure exists to support the proposal in the form of water and sewer lines, and roads. These proposed changes would rectify the detrimental effects of Land Use decisions which have in affect created a financial hardship on the Church and its congregation in building a new facility. The Church requests that the City recognize the unique set of c'ircumstances surrounding the property, and acknowledge that the proposed'changes are appropriate and timely with respect to prudent and orderly development in the area. Should you have any questions or concerns about this request please contact me at this office. Sinc rely, i 17 Russell S. Thompson, PE Senior Civil Engineer cc: Clayton Cullen, Atascadero Pentecostal Church of God 00008'7 a ATTACHMENT E FOLLOW-UP: LAND USE REQUESTS #7 AND #16 BACXGROUND• At the August 2.0, 1991 Planning Commission meeting, the Planning Commission directed staff to further evaluate two of the General Plan land use change requests.. REQUEST #7 : Location: 3505, 3555, and 3575 El Camino Real - Representative Robert D. Smith As part of the August 20th agenda packet, there was a letter from Robert D. Smith on behalf of Assessor' s Parcel Numbers 29, 32 and 33, seeking consideration of a change in the General Plan from Suburban Residential to Commercial Frontage (300 to 500 feet in depth) with Multi-family to the rear. At the hearing, Mr. Smith expressed concern that the parcel 33 currently within the Urban Service Line is proposed to be removed from the Urban Service Line. The Planning Commission asked that further research be done into this matter. In the early 80 ' s there were at least two requests for changes in the land use affecting these properties. In 1982 there was a re- quest to change the zoning on Assessor' s Parcel Number 33 (3555 E1 Camino Real) to permit a 3 acre senior citizen' s housing project and 2 acre church site. It was withdrawn at the City Council hearing. Thereafter, there was a request to change the density on the same parcel to Moderate Density Single Family Residential. A larger area was studied and the Council agreed with the Planning Commission and denied the request. Subse- quently, in 1986 there was a comprehensive revision to the City' s Urban Service Line which recognized the fact that Assessor' s . Parcel Number 33 had been annexed to the Sewer Improvement Dis- trict in 1977. As a result of the recent dissolution of the Sewer Service District, that boundary line has been supplanted by the Urban Service Line contained in the City' s General Plan. As indicated on attached maps, the property identified as 3505 - 3575 E1 Camino Real is designated Suburban Single Family Residential, and Assessor' s Parcel Number 33 is within the Urban Service Line. The draft land use plan shows the Urban Service Line as running along the southeasterly boundary of Assessor' s Parcel Number 33 to the rear of 1 acre lots on Campbell, a private street. The parcel is 5.24 acres in size. The Campbell 000088 ATTACHMENT E (CONT. ) fronting properties are recommended for Moderate Density Single Family consistent with the extension of the Urban SeIrvice Line • across San Anselmo. The question, then, is what to do with the issues raised by Mr. Smith. Alternatives include: 1. No Change - leave the boundary along the existing one acre parcels that front on Campbell. No new lots could be created. 2. Status Quo - move the boundary to include Assessor' s Parcel Number 33. This would encourage flag lotting of the five acres into one acre parcels unless a single conditional use - such as the Pentecostal Church - were to be viable. 3. Include Assessor' s Parcels 32 and 33. This would invite an opportunity for a cul-d,sac with acre parcels being created out of lots 32 and 33. 4 . Extend to Chapel Of The Roses. Sewer service is presently available as far as Chapel Of The Roses, which is the end property in the Retail Commercial designation across the street. The lots in this expanded area are 1 1/2 acres and less, except for Assessor's Parcel 29 which is a 3. 84 acre flag lot. 5. Tighten up. Move the Urban Service Line towards , San Anselmo to the southeasterly side of the Campbell Street subdivision and leave that area Suburban Single Family Residential. In any event, staff would not recommend any increase in density above the Moderate Density Single Family designation at this time. REQUEST #16• Location: 6000 San Palo - Representative Richard Summers This land area is currently designated on the General Plan as Retail Commercial and has been zoned Tourist Commercial. This change was done pursuant to a General Plan/Zoning Amendment in 1983. Prior to then, it was Low Density Single Family Residen- tial, which is the land use designation proposed as part of the General Plan Update. Consideration of the change was partly prompted by a ,letter from an individual during the course of the General Plan Community Forums. Additionally, however, it became problematical whether Tourist Commercial use would be attracted to the property. The cost of extending sewer from the other side of Highway 101 has been a problem. 000089 • �� <ti �­!q�_OLD URBAN SERVICE LINE glow ,• W LY ` A. .r. 4PAS . , "" �vI VIII ' • � . .` Prgmmw FA wvj ir ' g1lle nim n11/ OMEN /// ATTACHMENT F CITY OF ATASCADERO ENVIRONMENTAL COORDINATOR NEGATIVE DECLARATION COMMMIY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 6500 PALMA AVE. ATASCADERO, CA 93422 (805) 461-5035 APPLICANT: PENTECOSTAL CHURCH CANNON ASSOCIATES 364 PACIFIC SAN IUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 PROJECT TITLE: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT #94005 ZONING CHANGE 494006 PROJECT LOCATION: 3555 EL CAMINO REAL PROJECTDESCRIPTION: CONSIDERATION OF A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO INCLUDE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY WITHIN THE URBAN SERVICES LINE (USL), CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM RESIDENTIAL SUBURBAN TO MODERATE DENSITY SINGLE-FAMILY, AND CHANGE THE ZONING FROM RS TO RSF-Y . FINDINGS: 1. The project does not have the potential to degrade the environment. 2. The project will not achieve short-term to the disadvantage of long-team environmental goals. 3. The project does not have impacts which are individually limited,but comulatively considerable. 4. The project will not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings either directly or indirectly. DETERMINATION: Based on the above findings, and the information contained in the initial study(made a part hereof by refer- ence and on file in the Community Development Department). it has been determined that the above project will not have an adverse impact on the environment. Henry Engen Community Development Director Date Posted: JANUARY 31, 1995 . Date Adopted: CDD 1169 000091 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES EXCERPTS - 2/21/9 anning Commission Meeting, February 21, 1995 Georcre livan, a resident of Santa Margarita and a member of t Berean Bap ' st Church, said that he would hate to think that if he property be amaged to the extent that a rebuild would be re red, the church co d not be reconstructed because of its non-co orming use and that in 'ts place another apartment complex would e built. He felt that the p blic would be best served by having a church in the community. ACTION• A motion was made to fi the draft Negat' a Declaration prepared for this project to be a equate. Motion: Miller Second: Messer AYES: Miller, Messer, B ma, Bowen, Edwards, Wallace Johnson NOES: None ABSENT: None A motion was mad to recommend that the Ci Council adopt the attached draft esolution amending the Circ ation Element by changing th road classification of E1 Bord Avenue from a "local" to "collector" street. Motio Miller Sec d: Messer A S: Miller, Messer, Bonnema, Bowen, Wallace, Johns OES: Edwards ABSENT: None 2. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT #94005/ZONE CHANGE #94006: Request to include the subject property within the Urban Services Line (USL) , change the Land Use designation from Suburban Residential to Moderate Density Single Family Residential, and change the Zoning Map from Residential Suburban (RS) to RSF-Y (Residential Single Family - one acre minimum lot size with sewer, one and one-half acre without sewer available. ) (Pentecostal Church of God) (Cannon Associates) . Subject site is located at 3555 E1 Camino Real. (Page 4 of 12) 000092 Planning Commission Meeting, February 21, 1995 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: (Davidson) The Commission should make the following recommendations to the City Council: 1. Find the Negative Declaration prepared for the project to be adequate under the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act; and, 2 . Approve Resolution #11-95, including the subject property within the USL and changing the Land Use designation from Suburban Res iden-t-ial-t-o--Moderate--Density Single- Family -Residential; and, 3 . Approve Ordinance #284, changing the zoning designation of the subject property from RS to RSF-Y. TESTIMONY: Russ Thompson, Cannon Associates, was present to represent the applicant, thanked Mr. Davidson for an accurate portrayal of the history of this parcel. He emphasized that the soils 'in this area are . made up of hard and consolidated material, which is not great for percolation. Restoring this property to being inside the Urban Services Line will be a more sanitary condition for developing the property. He indicated that this change is consistent with the neighborhood character and should not create any unusual impacts. He offered to answer questions. Rush Rolmeine, P. O. Box 1990, Atascadero, asked whether the inclusion of the property within the Urban Services Line makes it automatically feasible to connect to the existing sewer line on El Camino Real or if that is not now possible. Mr. Davidson answered that if the property is included in the Urban Services Line, it will be feasible and engineeringly possible to connect to the existing sewer line on E1 Camino Real. Mr. Kolmeine asked if this action is necessary in order for that connection to occur. Staff responded that it was necessary. Don Plotkin, P. O. Box 260, Atascadero, who is a ;part-owner of a property at 3445 E1 Camino Real, which is the second parcel north on the same side of the street, reiterated that there is a problem with the soils in this location with all of the properties on septic systems. He pointed out that the sewer does run to Chapel of the Roses, which is just at the end of the Commercial Retail zone on the other side of the road. He indicated that it would make sense to him, if the Commission is going to make this change, to allow the several homes in this area to hook up also and include them 'in the Urban • (Page 5 of 12) 00009 Planning Commission Meeting, February 21, 1995 Services Line, as well. Mr. Plotkin does, however, support the change even if it does not include the other requested properties. ACTION: A motion was made to find the Negative Declaration prepared for the project to be adequate under the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) . Motion: Johnson Second: Edwards AYES: Johnson, Edwards, Wallace, Messer, Bonnema, Bowen, Miller NOES: None- ABSENT: None A motion was made to approve Resolution 111-95, including the subject property within the USL and changing the Land Use designation from Suburban Residential to Moderate Density Single Family Residential. Motion: Edwards Second: Wallace • AYES: Edwards, Wallace, Messer, Bonnema, Bowen, Miller, Johnson NOES: None ABSENT: None A motion was made to approve Ordinance #284, changing the Zoning designation of the subject property from RS to RSF-Y. Motion: Edwards Second: Bonnema AYES: Edwards, Bonnema, Wallace, Messer, Bowen, Miller, Johnson NOES: None ABSENT: None GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT #94003/ZONE CHANGE #94004: Reques o change the land use designation certain real property "Low Density Single F ' y" to "Tourist Commercial. " A Zo hange is also bei requested to change the zoning of the site accor ly- (f RSF-Z to CT) . (Richard and Sandra Summers) . Subject sit located at 6000 San Palo Road. (Page 6 of 12) • 000094 RESOLUTION NO. 11-95 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE MAP BY REDESIGNATING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY AT 3555 EL CAMINO REAL FROM SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL TO MODERATE DENSITY SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND INCLUDING THE SITE WITHIN THE URBAN SERVICES LINE (GPA #94005: Pentecostal Church) WHEREAS, the City of Atascadero has grown considerably since incorporation; and WHEREAS, the City's General Plan, which was prepared in the 1970' s, adopted in 1980, and amended in 1992 to guide the City' s general growth is in need of updating; and WHEREAS; the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero conducted a public hearing on the subject amendment on February 21, 1995; and WHEREAS, Government_ Code Section 65356 provides that a General Plan be amended by the adoption of a resolution; and WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Atascadero finds as follows: 1. The proposed General Plan amendment recommended by the Planning Commission is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan. 2. The proposed General Plan amendment will not have a significant adverse affect on the environment. The Negative Declaration prepared for the project is adequate. 3. The proposed extension of the Urban Services Line will not overburden the City' s sewer plant or collection system and will not adversely affect sewer service to other priority areas, specifically cease and desist locations. THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Atascadero does resolve to approve General Plan Amendment GPA #94005 as follows: 1. Amendment to the General Plan Land Use Element, Land Use Map as shown on the attached "Exhibit A". On motion by and seconded by . , the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety by the following roll call vote: 000095 Resolution No. 11-95 Page 2 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: DATE ADOPTED: CITY OF ATASCADERO, CA R. DAVID BEWLEY, Mayor ATTEST: - LEE PRICE, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: ANDREW J. TAKATA, City Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: ARTHER R. MONTANDON, City Attorney PREPARED BY: HENRY ENGEN, Community Development Director • II 000096 / Apr"�.• \i • • • ■ 000 _ •• _�� r ORDINANCE NO. 284 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO AMENDING THE OFFICIAL CITY ZONING MAP BY REZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY AT 3555 EL CAMINO REAL FROM RS (RESIDENTIAL SUBURBAN) TO RSF-Y (RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY MODERATE DENSITY) (Zone Change 94006) WHEREAS, the proposed zoning text amendment proposes standards that are consistent with the General Plan as required by Section 65860 of the California Government Code; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendment is in conformance with Section 65800 et seq of the California Government Code concerning zoning regulations; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendment does not have a potential to result in a significant adverse effect on the environment and the Negative Declaration prepared for the project is adequate; and WHEREAS, the Atascadero Planning Commission held a public hearing on February 21, 1995 and has recommended approval of Zone Change 94006. NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Atascadero does ordain as follows: Section 1. Council Findings. 1. The proposal is compatible with the surrounding land use and zoning designations. 2. The proposal is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Element. 3. The proposal will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts; the Negative Declaration prepared for the project is adequate. Section 2. Zoning Map. The City' s Official Zoning Map is hereby amended to reclassify the parcel listed below and as shown on the attached Exhibit A which is hereby made a part of this ordinance by reference. Assessor' s Parcel Map 049-163-033 Lot 102, Block 19 000098 Ordinance No. 284 Page 2 Section 3. Publication. The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published once within fifteen ( 15) days after its passage in the Atascadero News, a newspaper of general circulation, printed, !published and circulated in the City in accordance with Section $6933 of the Government Code; shall certify the adopting and posting of this ordinance and shall cause this ordinance and this certification together with proof of posting to be entered into the Book of Ordinances of the City. Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall go into effect and be in full force and effect at 12:01 a.m. on the 31st day after its passage. On motion by Councilperson and seconded by Councilperson , the foregoing ordinance is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ADOPTED: CITE' OF ATASCADERO By: R. DAVID BEWLEY, Mayor ATTEST: LEE PRICE, City Clerk d000g9 Ordinance No. 284 Page 3 APPROVED AS TO FORM: i ARTHER R. MONTANDON, City Attorney PREPARED BY: HENRY ENGEN, Community Development Director (M0100 CITY OF ATASCADERO EXHIBIT A en n ORDINANCE 284 '" "" COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT r _�\ l A Ol►d i / � if p ' sir;_: f fill I a V StILA�a t it I 1 « :tiu No Vii � I � �I I i f % � •C � f � � i \ I 5 t.►�. 101 \q,MON -7- ;10 Zap `F f a1p e Z <J i AI ' �EN�p — A — o�o ` ♦RIC, ? 000 01 i REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL Meetilg Date: 3/14/95 CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item: C-1 Through: Andy Takata. City Manager From: Bradford Whitty, Finance Directo i i SUBJECT Determine disposition of surplus constructionmonev and State Local Transportation Partnership Program (SLTPP) money held by City regarding the Street Improvement Project No . 1992 . (Las Encinas & 3-F Meadows RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that City Council review tie options and provide direction . 1 BACKGROUND: The City of atascadero issued a S903 . 356 . %�i limited obligation improvement pond for the i,as Encinas/3-F Meadows area in September 1993 . The purpose pias to nay for road improvements in those areas . Las Encinas - s portion of The financing is .5554. 660 . 60 while 3) �F Meadows is 33,18 .t695 . 53 . The city also appiied for SLTPP grant monies 'from the state DV qualifying the projects aforementioned . I The monies received for Las Encinas/3-F Meadows were 05 - 347 . 00 and $41 . 453 . 00 ; respectively. DISCUSSION: The City accepted the 3-F Meadows roads on .Tune ° i4 , 1994 , and Las Encinas roads on September 13 . 1994'. 'total construction costs were $530 , 392. 18 and SM9 , 448 . 65 , respectively. The City has incurred additional costs in correcting minor problems with the Las +Encinas portion o ti^.e project . ,e administration Df surplus assessment bona Proceeds are rned D-,r Sections i041 10417 . i of the Streets and j HiCTnway ':ede . Briefly stated. the 'City -ouncii must determine t .e amOUF!t of r;,e surp 1. l.is and apply the Burp i is towards one �r more i ne ic��i nurnoses . 1 . 000101J 3/ 14/95 Agenda Item: C-1 . continued Paget ( a) For transfer to the general fund of the cite, provided that the amount transferred shall not exceed the Lesser of one thousand dollars ($1 . 000) or 5 percent of the total amount expended from the improvement fund. (b) As a credit upon property owner assessment payments in accordance with Section 1041-7 . 1 of the Streets and Highway Code . (c) For the maintenance of the improvements . (d) To call bonds for redemption, thereby reducing outstanding assessments and subsequent assessment installments . A few additional points regarding the administration of the surplus proceeds are in order . First staff. does not anticipate meeting the requirement in (a) above . Second, if the proceeds are used to credit the property owner assessments ( b ) , no credit may be paid or credited until after a period of two years from the date of receipt of proceeds of the sale of bonds by the City. The City took receipt of the proceeds on September 13 , 19931 . therefore the credit cannot occur until after September i_% , 1.995 . Additionally. the credit would be a one time reduction of the owner' s assessment over one or more installments , and the original installment amounts would return once the credit was exhausted . Third., Council has the option to. set aside amounts to maintain the roads . The maintenance fund would be solely for the purpose of maintaining the roads in the project area . The interest earnings on the principal may be used to maintain the road on a continuous basis over a long period of time . :nus , the annual road maintainance has the potential to be self-funded.. Fourth. if Council chooses to call bonds , the next call date would be September 2, 1995 . The City would have to notify the fiscal agent of its intentions no less than thirty days in advance . A redemption premium of three percent plus a bond call fee would be charged . This amount would be exclusive of principal due durinv the fiscal year of prepayment . A bond call would reduce e�-eryone ' s annual assessment over the remaining life of the bond . The property owners who prepaid wouid receive a cash refund against their original payment . A portion of tine Special Reserve Fund would have to ne reduced as a credit to parcel owners . 000101,- • 3/14/9-5 C'- •agenda Item:�_ m _ i , continued Page., The SLTPP monies are available for use on othertransportation projects within the City or they may be applied as stated in (b) , ( c) , and (d) above . ' This money is not subject to the same arbitrage rules as the construction funds because it was not part of the original proceeds. It is a separate source of money. although Council may use this money on other transportation projects , staff believes it was intended to be utilized to benefit the project in some way. Examples of these choices are illustrated in Exhibit A. Again, these examples are for illustrative purposes and are not intended as absolute outcomes . The .final outcomes will be determined by Council action, and/or the fiscal agent , bond counsel , and the Atascadero Finance Department . CONCLUSIONS : Staff has presented the dispostion of the surplus available in the construction funds for the Las Encinas/3-F Meadows Projects . Also presented was the grant received from the SLTPP. Staff requests further direction and will bring back a resolution based on Council ' s direction at a later date . III 000-110l. 1 �HIBIT A City of Atascader0 • improvement Project No . 1982 t. . T . Calculation of Cash ro.sit 'Ion as of 3/2R/9 Las Encinas 3-F Meadows ------------ ------------ Gross Proceeds 555-x . 661. 348 . 696 Prepaid assessments '2 . 881 3. '_ . X83 investment Earnings 3t . 2 3 i6 . 71 ------------ ------------ 658 . 7q4 397 . Qg6 Less : Bond issuance Costs S, Reserve Set Asides 62. 322 39 . 179 Construction Costs 530 , 392 289 .449 ------------ ------------ 2/2S/95 Construction Fund 66 .081 1 69 . 36.8 3 Add. Q. inn R347 41 1 . ------------ ------------ 2,;2S/ 9-:; (-as i, aosition .1. 1.0 . 821 ------------ ------------ N(D i .. IS 66 . 081 /I pp-r-�!'. is 1-42, l 035 3 . 569 . P.9 rc� _ . -SS3 , 34-1 i O- Parce [ s ;29 h i `a 1 _ . 1 /r•- Parcel _ P---- _,arce 1 Snare is 2/2S /9� S i Y 'i� l,�- � iiuStra - ion of a Credit -Co wnei ASSeSsmentS .as Encinas 3-F 'Meadows ------------ ------------ Construction ;and Portion 5642, 1 . 03- SLIP portion 329 619 ------------ ------------ Nla': . Credit Available 1 . +70 1 . 651 199=+f95; Levy 669 62 Remaining Credit Sol 1 . 02q :993/16 Estimated Levy 6So ------------ ------------ wemaining Credit -6 3-`' ------------ ------------ i_>96/37 Owner ' s Portion t. >6 o t o : ? Own e r G wO Lt l(7 i�a V e `o i��i T!1 i Sestimated ?t�I T n(t 7 r i : 11 i rTl" 77 bcgi.nii^c with the 199 !'�� ye ir . Prepal+ C �k(�U i Ci 1'eC ;� ltiil un'_1er "Ma-x . crenit At'at labl [e,, 000101.4/ • I _ EXHIBIT -it", of Atascadero �treet improvement Project Nio , iia ? Ir . 4aintenace of improvements tilustration Las Encinas 3-F Meadows --- Principai Portion 5151 t2O 110 S?i annual Investment Earnings ( Assumes -51 Simpie interest Note : Investment Earnings could be used to pay for annual maintenance costs with any unused portion roiled over to principal . IV. Bond Cali iliustraiion Las Encinas 3-F Meadows Estimated Funds Ava.ilabie 511 . _'S 110 S?i Less : F:edempticn Premium 16. 025 10 . 0% Bond Calt Fees ( Est . ) 12 . 320 3 . 060 02 . 6Si rd : Bond !reserve !Tedi T . - 14 �. y� •A j us `e Fc r F�.lnd a V i .Bn i f�---1 i ,t/'—=—�— -----� :assessment PeduCtioh - Per Parcei 1 . 26 1 . 45 \Ole . rrepaid parcels would receive a cash refund while i -nnstaliillent narCe : S 0Uiu ave t e amcunt am over their remao ining ption of the debt , I REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda I em: C-2 Through: Andrew J. Takata Meeting Pate: 03/14/95 City Manager File Number: ZC 94001 1 From: Henry Engen A�f- Community Development Director 3 SUBJECT: Adoption of an ordinance amending the Zoning Map txt and map to establish a Planned Development Overlay Zone No. 1 for this 802 acre project. RECOMMENDATION: Approval and adoption of Ordinance No. 286 on second reading. 3 i BACKGROUND: On February 28, 1995, the City Council conducted apublic hearing on the above-referenced subject. The Council conc4rred with the Planning Commission's recommendation and approved Ordinance No. 286 on first reading. HE:ph Attachment: Ordinance No. 286 i i 1 i a 000102, ORDINANCE NO. 286 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AND MAP TO ESTABLISH PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY ZONE #11 FOR THE 3-F MEADOWS RANCH DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (ZC 94-001; Davis Family Trust) WHEREAS, the proposed zoning text amendments are consistent with the General Plan as required by Section 65860 of the California Government Code; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendments are in conformance with Section 65800 et seq. of the California Government Code concerning zoning regulations; and WHEREAS, the Environmental Impact Report prepared for the project is adequate and in conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act; and WHEREAS, the Atascadero Planning Commission held a public hearing on February 7, 1995 and has recommended approval of Zone Change 94-001 . NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Atascadero does ordain as follows : Section 1 . Council Findings . 1. The proposal is compatible with the surrounding land use and zoning designations . 2 . The proposal is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Element and other elements contained in the General Plan, and specifically, the General Plan Circulation Element . 3 . The Environmental Impact Report prepared for the project is adequate. Section 2 . Zoning Map. The City' s Official Zoning Map is hereby amended as shown on the attached Exhibit A and by the addition of the attached Exhibit B indicating the geographical boundaries and phasing plan of the RS (Residential Suburban) PD-11 Zone . 0001103 Ordinance No. 286 Page 2 Section 3 . Zoning Text . The Zoning Ordinance text is hereby amended by the addition of the language shown on the attached Exhibit C. Section 4 . Publication. The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to 'be published once within fifteen (15) days after its passage it the Atascadero News, a newspaper of general circulation, printed,'?, published, and circulated in the City in accordance with Section36933 of the Government Code; shall certify the adopting and pasting of this ordinance and shall cause this ordinance and this 'i certification together with proof of posting to be entered into the Book of Ordinances of the City. Section 5 . Effective Date. This ordinance shall go into effect and be in full force and effect at 12 : 01 a.m. on the 31st day after its passage. On motion by and seconded by the foregoing Ordinance is approved by the following role call vote : AYES : NOES : ABSENT: DATE ADOPTED: CITY OF ATASCADERO By: R. DAVID BEWLEY, Mayor ATTEST: LEE PRICE, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ARTHER R. MONTANDON, City Attorney PREPARED BY: HENRY ENGEN, Community Development Director 000104 i' ORDINANCE NO. 286 EXHIBIT A Pagel of 1 R S ` L(FH) S,-V R S _N I I 1 f/ f / . TARO v � / rTf�JJ040, 4040 i, II N Ar ----------------- o \f I R \♦ 1 ,y► \% , . (RS) �r4 Sp, < J 40 �y S, I �w 1 I \\ f New Zone="ABC' Old Zone=(XYZ) ®0Q . +f F i EXHIBIT C • Conditions of Approval (as amended 2-28-95) Zone Change 94-001 3-F Meadows Ranch (Davis Family Trust/EDA) Section 9-3 . 655 is hereby added to the Zoning Ordinance as follows : 9-3 .655 Establishment of Planned Development Overlay Zone No. 11 (PD 11) . The Planned Development Overlay Zone No. 11 is established as shown on the Official Zoning Maps (Section 9- 1 . 102) . The conditions of development are established: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: Planning Division 1 . To ensure conformance with the provisions of the PD-11 Overlay Zone, a Master Plan of Development shall be prepared which satisfies all of the following conditions prior to the recordation of any final document implementing Lot Line Adjustment 94-005 . The Master Development Plan shall consist of the 1"=40' feet plans entitled "Precise Road Alignment/Lot Grading Plan" amended and supplemented as required by these conditions. 2 . A Mitigation Monitoring Program, prepared in conformance with the Mitigation Monitoring Plan contained in the Final EIR for this project, shall be prepared and implemented prior to the commencement of any construction. Preparation of the Mitigation Monitoring Program shall be the financial responsibility of the applicant . 3 . The applicant shall demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the City Attorney, that adequate title and/or interest has been obtained for the existing Colony rights-of-way within the project boundary prior to approval of the Master Development Plan. 4 . The Master Development Plan shall show the location of building envelopes, leach field areas, and driveways for lots whose average slope exceeds thirty percent (300) . Said building, leach field and driveway locations shall be subject to the review and approval of the Community Development Director. S . Open space easements to provide wildlife corridors shall be provided in conformance with the recommendations of the Final EIR. Limits on fencing and other detrimental uses 0 within easement areas shall be restricted by the project 000107 EXHIBIT C Page 2 of 13 CC&R' s. The location of said easements and CC&R restrictions shall be subject to the review and approval of the Community Development Director. 5 . The "Open Space" lots (Lots A, B, & C) as shown on Exhibit B shall be offered for dedication to the City of Atascadero. 6 . Road Abandonment 94-001 shall be completed and all necessary documents shall be recorded prior to,or simultaneously with the recordation of any final document (s) implementing LLA 94-005 . 7 . Retaining walls shall be used wherever feasible to reduce the amount of grading necessary for the construction of roads and homes. Grading plans shall be reviewed by the City Engineer and Community Development Director to ensure that proposed grading does not exceed that necessary to develop the site. - 8 . Road Maintenance Agreements, in a form approved by the City Attorney, shall be prepared and recorded for each group of lots which share a driveway or other common access . Said agreements may be made a part of the CC&R' s, or may be recorded as deed restrictions, or may be recorded as separate road maintenance agreements. 9 . The applicant shall prepare a Comprehensive Restoration Plan (CRP) as part of the road improvement plans. The CRP shall be prepared by a qualified professional and shall address plant lists, planting methods (to include slope preparation, mulching and slope protection) , and a maintenance program, including weed control and irrigation. The CRP shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and Community Development Director prior to the issuance ofpermits for road construction. 10 . The lot line adjustment shall not result in the establishment of any greater number of lots that are nonconforming due to lot size than currently exists . The lot line adjustment shall not result in the establishment of any lot which is smaller than the smallest currently existing Colony lot within the subject site. Fire Department A. Water Supply 1 . The minimum required uired fire flow is 1000 gallons per minute 000108 EXHIBIT C Page 3 of 13 at 20 psi residual pressure for a 120 minute duration in residential development . The required fire flow will increase, as provided in UFC Appendix III-A, based on square feet of residential construction, with a 50% fireflow credit for automatic sprinkler systems. Verification must be provided from water company or fire department records in established areas or by a proof of design test at the completion of new on-site water main construction. 2 . Underground fire service mains and appurtenances shall conform to NFPA 24 minimum standard and plans are reviewed by the Fire Department prior to installation. The underground main size shall be a minimum of 8 inch diameter. Water mains and fire hydrants will be installed and in service prior to beginning combustible construction. If combustible building materials are used, the water supply mains and hydrants shall be designed, installed, tested, flushed and approved by the Fire Department prior to any stockpiling or installing any combustible materials . Water supply systems for phased construction shall provide the required fire flow at all phases . 3 . Fire Hydrants 3 . The minimum number and distribution of fire hydrants is one hydrant every 500 feet as provided in UFC Appendix Ill-B. The fire hydrant will be Atascadero Mutual Water Company specification with one 4 1/2" and one or more 2 1/2" outlets . Existing hydrants may be adequate, provided they consist of a minimum of one 4 1/2" and one 2 1/2" outlet . New hydrant color will be Safety Yellow for public right-of-way and Safety Red for private right-of-way. All hydrants in the public right-of-way to have "Blue Dot" highway reflector installed on the adjacent street of driveway to clearly identify the fire hydrant location. 4 . The dwellings shall be equipped with a residential automatic fire sprinkler system. The sprinkler system will be designed and installed according to NFPA Pamphlet #1 3D. The fire department requires a minimum 1" water meter for residential sprinkler systems . B. Fire Apparatus Access 1. If combustible construction materials are used, all required • public access roadways shall be completed to a minimum width 000109 EXHIBIT C • Page 4 of 13 of 201 , capable of supporting 40, 000 Ibs . , with an all-weather surface, to within 150' of all stockpiles and all sides of buildings with combustible construction. Said access roadways to be posted "NO STOPPING/FIRE LANE" and shall not be used for the storage of materials . Proposed private roads, driveways or extensions of existing roads shall be designed and constructed as follows : a. Single-family residential access road. A vehicular access to more than one parcel or vehicular access to a single parcel with more than two buildings or more than three dwelling units shall be 12 feet width for one-way traffic and 1 6 feet width for two-way traffic. The road shall also provide for a 1 0 foot fuel modification area on each side. b. Driveway. A vehicular access to a single' parcel with one or two buildings, having no more than 3 dwelling units on a single parcel and any number of accessory buildings. LENGTH REQUIRED WIDTH I' 0-49 feet 12 feet 50-99 feet 14 feet Greater than 200 feet 16 feet note '1 and note 2 NOTE: 1 . For driveways exceeding 300 feet, turnaround shall be provided at the building site and must be within 50 feet of the dwelling. 2 . For driveway exceeding 800 feet, a turnout shall be provided at the midpoint or every 400 feet . 2 . Fire apparatus access roads shall have an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 ' 611 . Driveways shall have not less than 15 feet of vertical clearance . 3 . Fire apparatus access roads and driveways shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of 40, 000 pounds at 25 mph, and shall be provided with a surface so as to provide all-weather driving capabilities 4 . The turning radius of a fire apparatus access road shall have a horizontal inside radius curvature of not less than twenty-eight (28) feet inside radius and forty-eight feet (48) outside radius. • S . All dead-end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with approved provisions 000110 EXHIBIT C . Page 5 of 13 for turning around of fire apparatus. The bulb or cul-de-sac radius shall not be less than 40 feet . The hammer-head T shall extend a minimum of 30 feet to each side of the centerline of the entry road and be 18 feet wide . The turnaround shall extend 40 feet from the entry road and be a minimum of 18 feet wide. Where parcels are zoned 5 acres or larger, turnarounds shall be provided at intervals of approximately 1320 feet, or as approved by the Fire Chief. Each dead-and road shall have a turnaround constructed at its terminus. 6 . The minimum level of improvement is determined by the grade of the access road or driveway providing access from the road to the building site or parking area as follows (UFC 10 . 204) : Surface Minimum Grade All-Weather less than 12% Non-skid (note 1) 120-. to 160-. Non-skid (note 2) over 160 Note 1 . Surface shall be asphalt or concrete in the City of Atascadero Engineering Standard Specifications and Drawings including a non-skid finish (brushed concrete or equivalent pavement) Note 2 . A driveway/access road that would provide a grade greater than 160-. and less than 20% and is designed by a Registered Civil Engineer may be considered on a case-by- case basis by the Fire Chief 7 . The maximum length of dead-end road, including all dead-end roads accessed from that dead-and roads, shall use the following cumulative lengths as a guideline for approval by the Fire Chief, regardless of the number of parcels served: Parcels less than one (1) acre 800 feet Parcels 1 ac. to 4 . 99 ac. 1320 feet Parcels 5 ac. to 19 . 99 ac. 2640 feet Parcels 20 + ac . 5290 feet All lengths shall be measured from the edge of the roadway surface at the intersection that begins from the road to the end of the dead-end road surface at its farthest point . Where a dead-end road crosses areas of differing zones, the shortest allowable length shall apply. C. Fuel Management 1 . All parcels shall comply with the fire department' s wildland 00011,11 EXHIBIT C Page 6 of 13 fuel management program. The hazardous vegetation that the program is concerned with is seasonal and recurrent in nature . Therefore, the operation of the program is planned on a continuous annual basis . Engineering Division D. Road Improvements - General 1. All road improvements shall be constructed inaccordance with the City of Atascadero Engineering Department Standard Specifications and Drawings or as directed by'? the City Engineer. 2 . An encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City Engineering Department prior to the start of construction. The applicant shall enter into an Plan Check/Inspection agreement with the City. 3 . Road improvement plans prepared by a registered civil • engineer shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer prior to approval of the Master'°, Development Plan. Road improvement plans shall conform to the requirements of the City Standard Specifications, Section 2 Preparation of Plans . R-value testing shall be done, and pavement sections designed by a registered civil engineer to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. E. Road Improvements - On-site 1 . The following roads shall be fully improved to a Rural Hillside Collector Section (City Std 404) , oras approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of building permits . The structural section shall be based on a T. I . = 5 . 0 . b. San Marcos Road from the project boundary to the intersection of Cenegal Road (prior to Phase I) a. Cenegal Road from the project boundary to the intersection of San Marcos Road (prior to Phase II) 2 . All other roads within the project boundary shall be fully improved to a Rural Hillside Local Section (City Std 402) , • or as approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of building permits . The structural section shall be based on ©0011.2 EXHIBIT C Page 7 of 13 a T. I . = 4 . 0 . 3 . The minimum right-of-way width for all on-site roads shall be 50 feet . 4 . All cul-de-sacs shall meet the requirements of City Standard 415, Typical Cul-de-Sac for rural areas with an unobstructed turning radius of 40 feet and a paved radius of 34 feet, or as approved by the City Fire Marshal . Areas not paved within the 40 feet unobstructed turning radius shall be designed and maintained to support imposed loads of 40, 000 pounds at 25 mph and shall be provided with a surface which provides for all weather driving capabilities. 5 . Slope easements shall be provided on each side of the right- of-way as needed to accommodate cut slopes, fill slopes and/or retaining structures. 6 . Curve widening shall be constructed on all on-site roads in conformance with Section 4, Paragraph F of the City Standard Specifications, or as approved by the City Engineer. 7 . On-site road alignments shall be designed such that all existing streets, roads and alleys outside the project boundary, which intersect the project boundary, are provided with, and capable of obtaining, access from the on-site roads . Road alignments outside the project boundary, which intersect the project boundary,- shall be clearly shown on the improvement plans. 8 . The applicant shall install all necessary street name and traffic signs as well as all necessary traffic striping and markings as required by the City Engineer. 9 . The applicant shall offer to dedicate all road rights-of-way for on-site roads to the City of Atascadero. Said irrevocable offer of dedication shall be filed prior to, or simultaneously with, the recordation of any final document implementing Lot Line Adjustment 94-005 . F. Road Improvements - Off-site 1 . Curve widening shall be constructed on Los Altos Road from Highway 41 to San Marcos Road where curve radii is less than 200 feet . Curve widening shall be constructed in conformance with Section 4, Paragraph F of the City Standard Specifications, or as approved by the City Engineer. Plans for the curve widening shall be submitted for review and 000113 EXHIBIT C Page 8 of 13 approval by the City Engineer prior to the approval of the Master Development Plan. The curve widening on Los Altos Road shall be constructed when the ADT on Los Altos Road reaches 500 vehicles per day, with the development of the 27th. lot in Phase 1, or within three (3) years of the issuance of building permits for Phase 1, whichever is earlier. 2 . A "STOP" sign and stop bar shall be constructed at the intersection of Los Altos Road and San Marcos Road and shall constructed with the development of Phase 1 of the project and prior to the issuance of building permits 3 . San Marcos Road between Los Altos Road and the project boundary shall be improved preparatory to acceptance of this portion of road into the City maintained system. Curve widening shall be constructed where curve radii is less than 2001 . Curve widening shall be constructed in conformance with Section 4, Paragraph F of the City Standard • Specifications, or as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for the curve widening shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer prior to approval of the Master Development Plan. San Marcos Road between Los Altos Road and the project boundary shall be improved prior to the development of Phase 1 of the project and prior to the issuance of building permits . 4 . The applicant shall enter into a maintenance 'agreement with the City for the portion of San Marcos Road between Los Altos Road and the project boundary. The agreement shall guarantee that damage to the road which results from construction traffic generated by the development of the project is properly repaired. The agreement 'shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and the City Attorney. The agreement shall remain in-force throughout construction of Phase 1 and Phase 2 of the project . A maintenance security in a form acceptable to the City Attorney and the City Engineer shall be posted for the portion of San Marcos Road between Los Altos 'Road and the project boundary. The maintenance security shall remain effective until final acceptance of both Phas=e 1 and Phase 2 of the project 000114 EXHIBIT C Page 9 of 13 5 . Left-turn lanes shall be constructed on State Highway 41 for eastbound traffic entering both Los Altos Road and the driveway serving Lots 109-112 . Improvement plans for the left-turn lanes shall be submitted for review and approval by Caltrans and the City Engineer prior to approval of the Master Development Plan. The left-turn lanes for Los Altos Road shall be constructed when the ADT on Los Altos Road reaches 500 vehicles per day, with the development of the 27th. lot in Phase 1, or within three (3) years of the issuance of building permits for Phase 1, whichever is earlier. The left-turn lanes for the driveways accessing Lots 109-112 shall be constructed with the development of any portion of Lots 109-112 . 6 . Vehicle refuge lanes shall be constructed for vehicles turning left onto State Highway 41 from both Los Altos Road and the driveway serving Lots 109-112 . Improvement plans for the refuge lanes shall be submitted for review and approval by Caltrans and the City Engineer prior to approval of the Master Development Plan. The vehicle refuge lane for Los Altos Road shall be constructed when the ADT on Los Altos Road reaches 500 vehicles per day, with the development of the 27th. lot in Phase 1, or within three (3) years of the issuance of building permits for Phase 1, whichever is earlier. The vehicle refuge lane for the driveways accessing Lots 109-112 shall be constructed with the development of any portion of Lots 109-112 . 7 . The improvements required to achieve a minimum of 550 feet of sight distance shall be constructed at the intersection of Los Altos Road and State Highway 41 and at the intersection of the driveway serving Lots 109-112 and State Highway 41 . Improvement plans for the site distance improvements shall be submitted for review and approval by Caltrans and the City Engineer prior to approval of the Master Development Plan. The site distance improvements for Los Altos Road shall be constructed when the ADT on Los Altos Road reaches 500 vehicles per day, with the development of the 27th. lot in • Phase 1, or within three (3) years of the issuance of building permits for Phase 1, whichever is earlier. 000115 EXHIBIT C Page 10 of 13 The site distance improvements for the driveways accessing Lots 109-112 shall be constructed with the development of any portion of Lots 109-112 . 8 . Advisory and warning signage shall be installed along State Highway 41 to advise drivers of the approaching intersection with Los Altos Road and the driveway serving Lots 109-112 . Signage shall be installed which indicates a left-turn lane ahead. Improvement plans for the signage improvements shall be submitted for review and approval by Caltrans and the City Engineer prior to approval of the Master' Development Plan. The signage improvements for Los Altos Road shall be constructed when the ADT on Los Altos Road reaches 500 vehicles per day, with the development of the'' 27th. lot in Phase 1, or within three (3) years of the issuance of building permits for Phase 1, whichever is earlier. The signage improvements for the driveways accessing Lots 109-112 shall be constructed with the development of any portion of Lots 109-112 . 9 . Designated right-turn lanes shall be constructed on State Highway 41 for westbound traffic entering both Los Altos Road and the driveway serving Lots 109-112 . Improvement plans for the right-turn lanes shall be submitted for review and approval by Caltrans and the City Engineer prior to approval of the Master Development Plan. The right-turn lane for Los Altos Road shall be constructed when the ADT on Los Altos Road reaches 500 vehicles per day, with the development of the 27th. lot in Phase 1, or within three (3) years of the issuance of building permits for Phase 1, whichever is earlier. The right-turn lane for the driveways accessing Lots 109-112 shall be constructed with the development of any portion of Lots 109-112 . 10 . Curve widening shall be constructed on the following roads where curve radii is less than 200 feet . Curve widening shall be constructed in conformance with Section 4, Paragraph F of the City Standard Specifications, or as approved by the City Engineer. Plans for the'! curve widening shall be submitted for review and approval by the City . Engineer prior to the approval of the Master Development Plan. 0001-16 EXHIBIT C Page 11 of 13 a. Laurel Avenue from Santa Lucia Road to Cenegal Road. b. Cenegal Road from Laurel Avenue to the project boundary. The curve widening shall be constructed when the ADT on Laurel Avenue reaches 500 vehicles per day, with the development of the 38th. lot in Phase 2, or within three (3) years of the issuance of building permits for Phase 2, whichever is earlier. 11 . A three foot (3' ) wide Class II base or other all weather surface walkway shall be provided along one side Cenegal Road from the project boundary to Laurel Avenue and along Laurel Avenue from Cenegal Road to Santa Lucia Road, or as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for the walkways shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer and -Community Development Director prior to approval of the Master Development Plan. The 3 foot wide pedestrian walkway shall be constructed when the ADT on Laurel Avenue reaches 500 vehicles per day, with the development of the 38th. lot in Phase 2, or within three (3) years of the issuance of building permits for Phase 2, whichever is earlier. G. Drainage 1. All drainage improvements shall be constructed in accordance with the City of Atascadero Engineering Department Standard Specifications and Drawings or as directed by the City Engineer. 2 . A grading and drainage plan for each lot, prepared by a registered civil engineer, shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of building permits . A registered civil engineer shall provide a written statement that all work has been completed and is in full compliance with the approved plans and the Uniform Building Code (UBC) . 3 . An erosion control plan addressing interim erosion control measures to be used during the construction shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer. Erosion control measures shall be in-place between October 1 and April 1 . Prior to issuance of Grading Permits, and if required under 000117 EXHIBIT C Page 12 of 13 the Clean Water Act (CWA) , the applicant shall obtain the necessary permits in compliance with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Systlem (NPDES) . H. Utilities 1 . All relocation and/or alteration of existing .utilities shall be the responsibility of the applicant . 2 . The applicant shall submit a composite utility plan signed and approved by a representative for each public utility company along with the improvement plans. 3 . The applicant shall install all new utilities; (water, gas, electric, cable TV and telephone) underground. Fire hydrants shall be installed at locations as required by the City Fire Marshal . Utilities shall be extended to the property line frontage of each parcel or its public utility easement . 4 . Any utility trenching in existing streets shall be overlayed to restore a smooth riding surface to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. I. General 1 . A Preliminary Soils Report shall be prepared for the property to determine the presence of expansive soil or other soil problems and shall make recommendations regarding grading of the proposed site. A final soils report shall be submitted by the soils engineer prior to the '!,final inspection and shall certify that all grading, was inspected and approved and that all work done is in accordance with the plans and the preliminary report . 2 . All improvements shall be covered with a 100% Performance Guarantee and a 50% Labor and Materials Guarantee until the improvements are deemed substantially complete by the City Engineer. Prior to the final inspection of the improvements, and before the other guaranteesmentioned in this condition are released, a 10% Maintenance Guarantee shall be posted to cover the improvements for a period of 1 year from the date of the final inspection. The guarantee amounts shall be based on an engineer' s estimate submitted by the project engineer and approved by the City Engineer. The Guarantees posted for this project shall be approved by the City Attorney. 000118 EXHIBIT C Page 13 of 13 3 . A Mylar copy and a blue line print of as-built improvement plans, signed by the registered engineer who prepared the plans, shall be provided to the City Engineer prior to the Final Inspection. 4 . The applicant shall acquire title or interest in any off- site land that may be required to allow for the construction of the improvements . The applicant shall bear all costs associated with the necessary acquisitions. 5 . All improvements shall be completed or bonded for prior to the approval of the Master Development Plan. If the improvements are to be bonded, the applicant shall enter into a Performance Agreement with the City. The form and content of the Performance Agreement shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and City Attorney. ®0Q1y1-9 8 i 1 i REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item: C-3 (A) Through: Andrew J. Takata, City Manager Meetin Date: 3/14/95 From: Henry Engen, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Economic Round Table's purpose and membership recommendation per Resolution No. 01-95 affirming the advisory committee's purpose and revising its membership RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. 01-95. i BACKGROUND: On January 26, 1991, the City Council by minute action (see attPched) created the Economic Round Table (ERT) as an advisory body on economic i�sues. Following a period of study and discussion, the ERT at their meeting of February 22, 1995, developed the attached Res. No. 01-95 for Council consideration. ANALYSIS: As proposed, the ERT membership would be reduced from 13 to9, with the Mayor or the Mayor's designee serving in the capacity of chairperson. Teams of office would coincide with appointments for the Planning Commission and Rarks & Recreation Commission, with selections made by the City Council for the 5 at-large members and- by ndby the respective organizations for the remaining members. As related information, the Council will soon be considering theproposed Economic Development Element prepared by Palmer-Koert. That document isuggests that con- sideration be given to restructuring the ERT as either a commission (which would mean being created by ordinance) or as an economic development corporation. The consensus of the ERT is supportive of retaining the present strupture of the group, with their main concern being one of having an economic development coordinator for support of the ERT. Hence, this issue could be resolved when the economic Develop- ment Element comes to the City Council. WHAT'S NEXT: The present membership of the ERT has a number of vacancies (soe attached) which will need to be formally appointed by the City Council HE:cw Enclosures j 000120 RESOLUTION NO.,01-95 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO AUTHORIZING REFINEMENTS TO THE PURPOSE AND MEMBERSHIP OF THE ECONOMIC ROUND TABLE 0 WHEREAS, On January 26, 1991, the Council of the City of Atascadero appointed a citizen Economic Round Table to work toward strengthening the City's economic base. WHEREAS, The Economic Base Analysis and Downtown Revitalization Study, conducted by Economic Research Associates (ERA) in 1988, recommended that, "the City shall initiate an Atascadero Economic Round Table...to regularly discuss, recommend and initiate community economic development and diversification". WHEREAS, In the.interests of prudent fiscal planning, the City commissioned a report from Crawford, Multari & Starr in 1990, entitled, Long-Range Fiscal Analysis, which concurred with the ERA recommendation by stating that, "the City will help initiate and support an Atascadero Economic Round Table composed of diverse representation of the business community and residents to discuss, recommend and start community economic development and diversification". WHEREAS, The City of Atascadero's General Plan Update states as a basic community goal to "provide for a sound economic base to sustain the City's unique character" and in its Land Use Element that, "As a post-Proposition 13 City containing over 24 square miles of land, 23 square miles of which is residential in nature, it is imperative that a sound economic base be assured" and, "Development of a sound economic base will be critical to maintaining and enhancing the community's identity as a distinctive free-standing City". WHEREAS, It is a priority of the City of Atascadero to plan for a stable economic future, in keeping with the overall character of the community as stated in the General Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, The Atascadero City Council does resolve to refine the membership and purpose as follows: 1. Economic Round Table Membership. Membership of the Economic Round Table shall consist of nine (9) members appointed by the City Council as follows: 1 . One (1) member of the City Council (Mayor or designee) 2. One (1) member of the Chamber of Commerce 3. One (1) member of the Business Improvement Association 4. One (1) member of the Planning Commission 5. Five (5) members-at-large from the business and financial community 0001'A_'-,0,/ Resolution No. 01-95 Page two of three . 2. Terms. The City Council shall appoint the members of the Economic Round Table. Four (4) members shall be appointed for terms which shall expire on August 31 , 1996, and four (4) members shall be appointed for terms which expire on August 31, 1998. The Council member appoint- ment shall be determined annually. Thereafter, all terms except for the Council member shall be four (4) years and shall expire four (4) years after August 31 of the date of appointment, except those appointments made after the commencement of the term to fill a vacancy or removal, in which case the term of office shall be for the balance of the unexpired term. 3. Duties and Responsibilities. The Round Table is not intended to serve as a conventional Council-appointed committee but rather as a City/private partnership of local citizens working to enhance the economic viability of the community toward goals identified in the City's General Plan and related policy documents. Toward this end, the :Round Table shall pursue the following: A. Become familiar with the Economic Research Associates report and recommendations, the Long-Range Fiscal Analysis report's content and recommendations, and the goals and objectives of the City's General Plan. B. Recommend means for encouraging the retention and enhance- ment of existing economic enterprises within the City of Atascadero. C. Recommend methods for targeting economic activities and enterprises which should be pursued in order''to complement the City's existing industrial/commercial base while enhancing the City's principal revenue sources. D. Recommend, as appropriate, local development of a craftsmen park, home furnishings district, restaurant row, auto mall and unique traveler destination economic enterprises consistent with Item #C. E. Follow up on any question referred to it by the City Council for investigation, finding or report. 4. Operations. The Round Table shall annually choose its own officers, as appropriate, make its own rules and regulations, including appointment of subcommittees, and keep a journal of its proceedings. Selection of officers shall be at the September meeting or as soon thereafter as is feasible. The majority of its members shall be a quorum for the trans- action of business where specific recommendations are to be made. Otherwise, meetings with less than a quorum may be held as determined by the Chair. Resolution No. 01-95 Page three of three 5. Meetings. The Round Table shall meet at the discretion of its elected chair, provided that it shall meet at least quarterly. Proper notice of time, place and agenda of said meetings shall be posted in accordance with the provisions of Section 54956 of the Government Code of the State of California. 6. Reports. The chairperson of the Round Table shall report to the City Council, as appropriate,for information or recommended action, with the understanding that there shall be at least semi-annual reports on the Round Table's activities. On motion by Councilmember , seconded by Councilmember the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll-call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ADOPTED: BY: R. DAVID BEWLEY, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: ARTHER R. MONTANDON, City Attorney APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: ANDREW J. TAKATA, City Manager ATTEST: LEE PRICE, City Clerk 000120.3 3. RESOLUTION NO. 12-91 - ESTABLISHING ATASCADERO ECONOMIC ROUND TABLE Mayor Lilley introduced the item and announced' that appointee, Richard Shannon, had advised him that he would'' not be able to serve an the Round Table and wished to have his name removed from the proposed resolution. CC2/ab/91 Page 3 The City Manager reported that Mr. Shannon ' $ withdrawal would result in a membership of twelve and explained that the format of the resolution was to provide guidance for the Committee. Councilwoman Bdr esan thanked staff * far using great care a.,d craftsmanship in preparing the resolution, and stated that she .11 a5 5uppaf- ti .a of far,nirig the Round Table. She indicated , however , that she had a prcblem with putting '„. the committee in place by reselutien because it mayi appear 'i to be cf simii_:r standing to the Planning Ccmmission. Mr . Windsor noted that the Rcund Table would be unique in that it :yould meet only as ,ecessary to address issues . Henry Engen clarified that the Planning Commission and other formal advisory bodies are established by ordinance and specific appointments are made by resolution. Councilwoman 8nrgeson asserted that she could support a motion to put the Round Table into place, but strongly opposed establishing it by resolution. Councilman Dexter remarked ''that it would be sufficient to simply establish the committee by action of the Council . Councilman Shiers agreed . There were no public comments. MOTION: By Councilman Dexter and seconded by Councilman Shiers that the City Council of Atascadero establish the Economic Round Taole and define i'ts ' purposes and I specific membership as outlined in proposed Resclution :Na . 12-91 ; motion carried 4:4. 4. BUDGET REVIEW - 5-YEAR CAPITAL PROGRAM MOTION: ouncilman Dexter and seconded by Coun ' man Shiers to tinue this matter as Item # under Regular usiness; otion carried . The City Manager noted , for tie publ ' , that in ''light of earlier discussion, this matter may b over to a City Council study session. 5. COUNTY SATELLITE CILITIES Councilwoman P gem-an an submitted her that 19 991 statement to the B d of Supervisors (see Exhibit A) request i q�_atellite• offic to the North County. She asked that the' (:ouncil \b-acl )jh �20 rearrest by adootinc a -esolution of support . / A__XCADERO ECONOMIC ROUND TAB-^4' PURPOSE AND MEMBERSHIP The City of Atascadero has appointed a citizen Economic Round Table to work toward strengthening the City's economic base. The Economic Base Analysis and Downtown Revitalization Study, conducted by Economic Research Associates (ERA) in 1988, recommended that, "the City shall initiate an Atascadero Economic Round Table. . .to regularly discuss, recommend and initiate community economic devel- opment and diversification". In the interests of prudent fiscal planning, the City commis- sioned a report from Crawford, Multari & Starr in 1990, entitled, Long-Range Fiscal Analysis, which concurred with the ERA recommen- dation by stating that, "the City will help initiate and support an Atascadero Economic Round Table composed of diverse representation of the business community and residents to discuss, recommend and start community economic development and diversification" . Further, the City of Atascadero' s General Plan Update states in its Draft Land Use Element that, "As a post-Proposition 13 City containing over 24 square miles of land, 23 square miles of which is residential in nature, it is imperative that a sound economic base be assured" and, "Development of a sound economic base will be critical to maintaining and enhancing the community' s identity as a distinctive free-standing City" . In creating the Economic Round Table, the City Council has acknowledged that it is a priority of the City to plan for a stable economic future, in keeping with the overall character of the com- munity as stated in the General Plan and other sources. 1. Economic Round Table Membership. The Economic Round Table shall consist of twelve ( 12) members appointed by _ the City Council as follows: 1. Mayor 2. Financial institutions (Santa Lucia National Bank, Mid-State Bank and Bank of America) 3. Three members of the Chamber of Commerce 4. Two members of the Business Improvement Association 5. Three members-at-large Initial appointees shall be as follows: Mayor: 1. Robert Lilley Financial Institutions: 2. Stan Cherry 3. Mike Kirkwood 4. John Cotsenmoyer Chamber of Commerce: 5. Bill Mazzacane 6. Ray Johnson 7. Dave Vega Business Improvement Association: 8. John Himes 9. Jack Porter (Continued next page) 000120.r Members-_I-Large: 10. Muriel rorb+,a 11. Mildred Copelan 12. Jack Stinchfield 2. Terms. Except for the Mayor, who shall be the current incumbent, the twelve members shall be appointed to two year terms, ending on June 30, 1993, which;;may be extend- ed as deemed appropriate by Council. 3. Duties and Responsibilities. The Round'' Table is not intended to serve as a conventional Council-appointed committee but rather as a City/private partnership of local citizens working to enhance the economic viability of the community toward goals identified in the City' s General Plan and related policy documents,. Toward this end, the Round Table shall pursue the following: A. Become familiar with the Economic Research Asso- ciates Report and recommendations, the Long-Range Fiscal Analysis Report's content and recommenda- tions, and the goals and objectives; of the City' s General Plan. B. Recommend means for encouraging the retention and enhancement of existing economic enterprises within the City of Atascadero. C. Recommend methods for targeting economic activities and enterprises which should be pursued in order to complement the City' s existing industrial/commer- cial base while, enhancing the City' s principal revenue sources: D. Recommend, as appropriate, local development of a craftsmen park, home furnishings district, restau- rant row, auto mall and unique traveler destination economic enterprises consistent with Item #C. E. Follow up on any question referred'I to it by the City Council for investigation, finding A deport. 4. Meetings. The Round Table shall meet at the discretion of the Mayor, provided that it shall meet 'i.at least quar- terly. Proper notice of time, place and ',agenda of said meetings shall be posted in accordance with the provi- sions of Section 54956 of the Government Code of the State of California. S. Reports. The chairperson of the Round Table shall report to the City Council, as appropriate, for ''information or recommended action, with the understanding that there shall be at least semi-annual reports on the Round Table' s activities. 2 0 •OJ 1i f210,16 City of Atascadero ECONOMIC ROUND TABLE (Mailing List) 1. Councilman Ray Johnson 9. City of Atascadero City Tr-eas � 6500 Palma Ave. 10906 SaRta Ana Rd. Atascadero, CA 93422 n+,.,.,..,, eFG rn 9342 Ph: 461-9288, or 461-5010 2. Stan Cherry 10. KaGeySuNi�ran- Santa Lucia Natl. Bank Wells4 P.O. Box 6047 6966 E. M Atascadero, CA 93423 AtaseadeFO, CA 93422 Ph: 466-7087 Ph: 466 7^ 3. 11. Jack Stinchfield Mod State Bank Stinchfield Financial Vacant 7350 EI Camino Real Atascadero, CA 93422 Ph: 466-0111 4. Jim Edwards 12. Robert Lilley Planning Commission Attorney at Law 2800 EI Camino Real 8740-B Pueblo Atascadero, CA 93422 Atascadero, CA 93422 Ph: 466-2070 Ph: 466-3545 5. Micki Ready 13. Don Price Chamber of Commerce Systems 42 6550 El Camino Real 8330 Morro Road Atascadero, CA 93422 Atascadero, CA 93422 Ph: 466-2044 Ph: 461-1622 6. Vacant i City Staff contacts: 7. Missie Hobson Andy Takata, City Manager Pacific Gas & Electric Ph: 461-.5010 P.O. Box 119 Templeton, CA 93465 Henry Engen, Director Ph: 434-4413 Community Development Ph: 461-5097 8. John Himes Paper Works Printing Brad Whitty, Director 5900 Entrada Ave. Finance Atascadero, CA 93422 Ph: 461-5012 Ph: 466-6680 • (Revised 2/15/95) 0.00120.? 4 3 REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item: C-3(B) Through: Andrew J. Takata MeetingjIDate: 03/14/95 City Manager From: Henry Engenj Community Development Director 3 i SUBJECT: Economic Round Table Recommendation: Proposed inil iation of a Zoning Text Amendment to allow offices on the first floor in the Pedestrian Retail- Overlay Zone. RECOMMENDATION: l Initiate the requested Zoning Text Amendment for consideration by the Planning Commission. ? li I BACKGROUND: At their January 18th, 1995 meeting, there was aPr" esentation before the Economic Round Table by Dwight and Shakia Huffman on their small business incubator concept at 5943 Tralffic Way. In order to obtain their business license under the present zoning, the Huffman's had to offer retail products, (see attached text) . As may be noted, Conditional Use Permits are requi ed for offices in this particular area. Given the high degree ofvacancies and lack of "pedestrian retail" strength evident t4ay in the downtown, the consensus was to liberalize this palticular requirement and allow offices to locate in this area as an allow- able principal permitted use. HE:ph 1 Encl: Zoning Ordinance Text i cc: Don Price, Business Improvement Association Micki Ready, Atascadero Chamber of Commerce Dwight & Shaku Huffman i 1 i a 0001 'I j3 i l� EXHIBIT E CITY OF ATASCADERO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DOWNTOWN OVERLAY ZONE PEDESTRIAN RETAIL DEPARTMENT ZC 04-90 IF rA L-LL ,�iii //.�%��.ii/♦ • 000110-12, ADOPTED JUNE 271 1983 PR (Pedestrian Retail) Overlay Zone - 9-3.501. Purpose: The Pedestrian Retail Overlay Zone identifies that area within the Downtown General Plan designation that has the greatest potential for reinforcement as the City' s ', primary retail shopping area. For these reasons, ground floor uses within the PR Overlay Zone will be limited to encourage supportive retail and pedestrian oriented service uses. 9-3. 502. Allowable Uses: The following uses shall be allowed in the Pedestrian Retail Overlay Zone. The establishment of allowed uses shall be as provided by Section 9-2. 107 (Plot Plans) and Section 9-2. 108 (Precise Plans) : (a) Furniture, home furnishings and equipment (b) General merchandise stores (c) Personal services (d) Utility offices (e) Hardware (f) Eating and drinking places (exclusive of drive through • ! facilities) (g) Residences (second floor only) 9-3. 503. Conditional Uses: The following uses may be allowed in the Pedestrian Commercial Zone. The establishment of conditional uses shall be as provided by Section 9-2. 109 (Conditional Use Permits) : (a) Amusement services (b) Public assembly and entertainment (c) Libraries and museums (d) Retirement hotel (second floor use only) -- (e) Offices (f) Temporary events 9-3. 504. Development Standards: Setbacks, minimum lot size, parking requirements, and sign regulations shall be the same as for the Pedestrian Commercial zone. 3-57 00012.3 { i a I MEMORANDUM TO CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM: C-4(A&B) CITY OF ATASCADERO DATE: 3/14/95 's THROUGH: Andrew J. Takata, City Manager FROM: Brady Cherry, Director of CommunityServices i SUBJECT: REVISION TO THE CITY OF ATASCADERO FACILITY POLICIES, PROCEDURES AND FEES RECOMMENDATION• The staff and Parks and Recreation Commission recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 23-95 revisingi the Policies, Procedures and Fees for City facilities. BACKGROUND: The Department of Community Services is responsible for administration of the rental and use of City ;! facilities by community groups and other agencies. To administer this process effectively and efficiently, staff has developed 'procedures and regulations compiled in the attached document. This document was originally adopted by the City Council in October of 1991, and amended annually since then. In an effort to continually update our policies and respond to increased demands fromthe community, and changes in use patterns, staff is recommencing additional revisions to this document. DISCUSSIONS• A majority of the significant revisions to the Cit 's Facilities, Policies, Procedures and Fees involve two issues wiich are use of City facilities by religious groups and use of City, facilities for large special events. i Staff is recommending changes to the policy regar�ing the use of City facilities by religious groups, due to previou4 direction from the City Council to the City Attorney to addresslthis issue. A staff report from the City Attorney regarding the proposed changes is attached. 1 Recommended revisions regarding the use of City facilities for large special events is in response to an increase lin the requests by outside groups and individuals to use Atascadero Lake Park and the Sunken Gardens for these types of events. Detailed policies are currently determined individually for each roposed event. Staff are also concerned about the impact that these events have on our facilities, and on other park users. The proposed policies attempt to place some reasonable controls on these events, and to recover costs incurred by the City. i l r i Additional minor changes to this document have been recommended and are listed below, along with an explanation for each recommended change. Page/Policy Change and Rationale 2 Remove the line below the description of the Paloma Creek BBQ Area indicating that this is not a "reservable" facility. It is desirable to reserve this facility for groups and individuals as is done at Atascadero Lake Park. This is also a potential revenue source. 6 Changes to the language regarding the use of City facilities by religious groups per instructions from the City Attorney. Report attached. 8 Revise the temporary sign policy to conform to the City's Sign Ordinance which only allows for a sign to be posted 20 days before an event, not 30 as was previously allowed in this document. 10 Add a regulation at Atascadero Lake Park prohibiting the use of portable barbecues in front of the gazebo due to complaint from the public about smoke from these portable BBQs during public concerts. 15 Add a line to the Explanation of Basic Fees indicating that the fee rates do not include equipment unless specifically stated. 17 Add a fee for Paloma Creek BBQ Area. The same rate is recommended as charged for the two large BBQ areas at Atascadero Lake Park. 17 Add Major Special Event Fee for use of all grass areas, BBQ areas, and Gazebo for one event. B-Rate Non-profit fee determined to reimburse Department costs, including: 1. Lost rental of BBQs & Gazebo $102. 00 2 . Rec. Supervisor cost 2 hrs x $30/hr $ 60. 00 3 . Parks Supervisor cost 1 hr x $30/hr $ 30. 00 4 . 2 Park Main. staff x 2 hrs x $25. 00 $100.00 C-rate was established based on a consistent increase of fees above the non-profit rate established for other facilities. Add statements that the City could increase the Security Deposit for Major Special Events with anticipated attendance in excess of 1, 000, and that the City could apply a 10 percent charge to the gross ticket revenue from an event instead of the standard fee. These two items were inserted to protect the City's interest as a result of extremely large events that may have adverse effects on the facility or require significant staff support. Also, if promoters are making a 0()r?"'.12)'S profit by conducting a commercial event, the City deserves a reasonable share for use of the park. 18 Add room #104 to the Fee Schedule for meeting room space at the City Administration Building. This room was inadvertently left off in the past. 20 Add facility rental rates for the Atascadero Youth Recreation Center, (formerly the Masonic Temple Building) . This facility is periodically rented by outside groups and organizations, and fees have not been established for this facility since it's acquisition. 21 Revise the Softball Tournament Guidelines to establish a non- refundable reservation deposit, and to eliminate a typographical error which listed two C rates. Also eliminated was a D-rate which should have been struck during the last revision when the entire D classification was eliminated. 24 Significant revisions to Major Special Events Policy. The City has experienced an increase in requests for the use of our facilities for large special events, yet does not have established policies and procedures for such '!! requests. The revisions to this section of the policy primarily bring together in one document, all of the current State, County and City requirements for such events. Most of the requirements listed in this document have been applied to Major Special Events in the past. Two significant new policy recommendations are to require recycling containers at each event, and to limit the number of events at each facility to no more than six events during the peak use period between spring break and Labor Day weekend. Attached is a draft copy of the City of Atascadero Facility Use Fees, Policies and Procedures for your review. feesrevi.mem OOQ1�6 MEMORANDUM TO CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM: DATE: 3-15-95 THROUGH: Andrew J. Takata, City Manager FROM: Brady Cherry, Director Department of Community Services SUBJECT: REVISION TO THE CITY OF ATASCADERO FACILITY POLICIES, PROCEDURES AND FEES The staff and Parks and Recreation Commission recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 23-95 revising the Admission fee for the Charles Paddock Zoo. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve a fee increase for the Charles Paddock Zoo. Recommended Fees and Age Range Current Fees & Ages Adult (ages 16-64) $2 . 50 ($2 .00, ages 18-64) Youth (ages 3-15) $1. 50 ($1. 00, ages 6-17) Seniors (ages 65 plus) $1.75 ($1. 25) Children (ages 2 & under) free (ages 5 & under) It is also recommended that the "free day" each month be modified to include only the hours of 10 am to noon, not the entire day. The zoo also proposes to charge a rental fee of $1.00 for strollers. Currently there is no charge. BACKGROUND: The Charles Paddock Zoo has not had a fee increase in years. A survey of other accredited zoos of similar size reveal our zoo is under priced and that a fee increase is justified. In addition, an adjustment in our age range for children and youth seems appro- priate. Within the zoo professions, many zoos use the cost of a movie as a guideline for their admission fees. Adult admission to the Century Cinemas is $6. 50 for adults and $4 . 00 for children 5-12 and seniors. For two hours of entertainment our admission fee is modest compared to that of a movie. Given the zoo's severe financial hardship, it seems reasonable that the zoo's user groups support a greater portion of the zoo's operating costs. However, we are still maintaining accessibility for user groups who could not otherwise visit the zoo. A local service club has offered to donate three "Red Flyer" wagons to be used for our stroller rental program. Currently no fee is charged. 0001'21'7 • FISCAL IMPACT• Based on the attendance figures of 1994, the Charles Paddock Zoo and the City of Atascadero should realize an increase in revenues of $44, 426. Current gate accounting does not allow for a breakdown of free admissions for Zoological Society membersand "free day" admissions. We are also unable to determine precisely how many children between the ages of 3 and 5 are now entering the zoo free. At a conservative estimate of 50% (more likely 65%) , this alone would include an increase in revenue of $14,467. Assuming this fee increase is approved and takes effect in sixty days, the zoo's revenue could be increased by $10, 000 for the last two months of the current fiscal year. • 0O01'8 RESOLUTION NUMBER 23-95 . RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA, .ADOPTING REVISED FACILITIES, POLICIES, PROCEDURES AND FEES The City Council of the City of Atascadero, California, hereby resolves as follows: WHEREAS, the Government Code provides that fees may be collected for City parks and recreation facilities and activities; and WHEREAS, it is Appropriate to establish user fees and depo , cost of providing services requested; and assary to estalbish written policies and proc, dental of City facilities; and I Facilities Policies, Procedures and Fees (inc. _ p to the Charles Paddock Zoo) shall be as prop( (filed under separate cover with the City Cler) WHEREAS, the City Facilities, Policies, Procedures and Fees shall become effective immediately upon adoption. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council for the City of Atascadero does hereby adopt Resolution No. 23-95, amending Resolution No. 146-93 . PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Atascadero, held on the 14th day of March, 1995. ATTEST: CITY OF ATASCADERO LEE PRICE, City Clerk R. DAVID BEWLEY, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: ARTHER R. MONTANDON, City Attorney 000-1 w9 CITY OF ATASCADER0 FACILITY POLICIES, PROCEDURES AND FEES PREPARED BY: Staff Department of Community Services • February 16, 1995 00011jo FACILITY POLICIES, PROCEDURES AND FEES INDEX Facilities Available for Rental . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Definitionof Terms. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 GeneralConditions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Availability of Facilities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 GeneralPolicy. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Enforcementof Rules. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Right of Full Access. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Hoursof Operation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Supervision. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Security. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 CeremonialOccasions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Capacity of Facilities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Concessions. . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 AdmissionCharges. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Displaying Written Materials. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Pamphlets, Articles, Commercial Demonstration: andPromotion Campaigns. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Signage. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Storage. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Damage. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 CleanUp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Useof Equipment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Dances. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Decorationsor Stage Props. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Prohibited Behavior. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Smoking. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Alcoholic Beverages. . . . . 9 AbandonedEquipment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Permitsand Licenses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Amplified Music. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Rules and Regulations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Feeand Permit Procedures. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Fees. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Classification of Users. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Explanation of Basic Fees. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 Additional Charges. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 MinimumCharges. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 ReservationDeposit. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 SecurityDeposit. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 0 0001.211 I • Facility Fee Schedule. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 AtascaderoLake Park. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 Charles Paddock Zoo. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 City Administration Building. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17/18 Pavilion. . . . . . . . 18 AlvordField. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 PalomaCreek Park. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 EquestrianArena. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Traffic Way Park. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . '. . . . . . . . 20 SunkenGardens Park. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . '. . . . . . . . 20 Softball Tournament Guidelines. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 Fees. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 Alcoholic Beverage Policy. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 FoodService Policy. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 Major/Special Event Procedures. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24/25 • ©00-1� 32 CITY OF ATASCADERO DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY SERVICES FACILITIES AVAILABLE FOR RENTAL FACILITY DESCRIPTION ATASCADERO LAKE PARR: BARBECUE AREA #1 Barbecue pit with seating for approx- imately 150 people. Electricity available. BARBECUE AREA #2 Barbecue pit with seating for approx- imately 150 people. Electricity available. BARBECUE AREA #3 Barbecue pit with seating for approx- imately 50 people. No electricity available. GAZEBO/BANDSTAND: Covered patio area suitable for outdoor concerts, meetings, etc. Electricity and lights available. RANGER HOUSE/MEETING ROOM: A house setting with a conference room for 27 people maximum. Kitchen • and bathroom available. PAVILION: 10,000 square foot facility, suitable for receptions, dances, meetings, and special events. See page 16 for room capacities) . Kitchen facility, and several various sized meeting rooms available. ALVORD FIELD: Adult-sized baseball field with field lights, bleachers, and restrooms. PALOMA CREEK PARK• SOFTBALL FIELDS # 1 & 2: Two adult-sized softball fields with field lighting, bleachers, food concession and restrooms. SPORTS OPEN FIELDS: Two large multi-purpose open space fields suitable for sports activities or special events. BASEBALL FIELD: Fenced youth sized baseball field with bleachers. • 1 0001 13 PALOMA CREEK PARK (Cont'd) : • EQUESTRIAN ARENA: Multi-purpose equestrian arena avail- able for daily/annual membership usage and special events. Arena lighting and announcer's booth available. BARBECUE FACILITY: A barbecue pit with picnic tables to accommodate approximately 20 people. TRAFFIC WAY PARK: SOFTBALL FIELDS 1 & 2: Two youth-sized softball fields No field lighting. .bleachers, food concession, and restrooms available. Retrieval of balls over the outfield fence is not allowed, SUNKEN GARDENS PARK: Large multi-purpose grass area adjacent to City Administration Building, suitable for special events. CITY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING: ROOM 102: Conference room with a maximum occupancy of 24 people conference/ dining ROOM 104: Conference room with ' a maximum capacity of 49 people conference/ dining FOURTH FLOOR ROTUNDA: Large open round room suitable for large meetings and special events. Maximum occupancy for conference/dining is 160 people and assembly/dancing ',at 250 people No alcoholic beverages allowed. FOURTH FLOOR CLUB ROOM: Conference room with a maximum occupancy of 49 people conference/ dining. 2 000 ':; CITY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING (Cont'd) : FOURTH FLOOR KITCHEN: Large commercial sized facility without utensils or dishes. PAVILION• ROTARY ROOM: Conference room with a maximum capacity of 206 people dining/ conference or 440 people assembly/dancing. Room overlooks Atascadero Lake. SARAH GRONSTRAND ROOM: Conference room accommodating a maximum of 100 people dining/ conference or 210 people assembly/ dancing. Room overlooks Atascadero Lake. COMMUNITY ROOM: Conference room accommodating a maximum of 62 people dining/ conference or 130 people _ assembly/dancing. KITCHEN: A complete kitchen, offering various types of food service. It is fully equipped with dishes, cups, glass- ware, flatware, and some cookware. 3 000135 DEFINITION OF TERMS CITY - City of Atascadero CONFIRMATION - A formal permit authorizing usage of City facilities under stipulated conditions. . DEPARTMENT - The City of Atascadero, Department of Community Services. DIRECTOR - Director of the Department of CommunityServices. FACILITY - Any building or park administered by the Department of Community Services. RESIDENT - A person living within the incorporated boundaries of the City of Atascadero. RESIDENT-GROUP - A business, organization, or group of persons that reside in the City of Atascadero. NON-RESIDENT - A person living outside the incorporated boundaries of the City of Atascadero. NON-RESIDENT GROUP - A business, organization, or group that do not meet the definition of resident group- NON-PROFIT GROUP - Individuals, groups, or organizations whose activity is not oriented towards private monetary gain. Non-profit status proof is required. PROFIT GROUP/COMMERCIAL - Individuals, groups, or organizations whose activity is oriented toward private monetary gain. PERMIT - A written agreement issued to an applicant under the authority and conditions of the Department of Community Services, and may include any amendment or supplement to such permit. PERMITTEE - Any person, group of people, company, or organization that has received a documented permit confirming a facility reservation application from the City. SECURITY DEPOSIT - A refundable deposit submitted prior to usage of various facilities to insure that the facility is 'left clean and without damage to the facility or it's furnishings "; and equipment. RESERVATION DEPOSIT - A reservation deposit is ]non-refundable, required for certain City facilities, and is due at time the permit application is submitted. This deposit will be applied towards the facility usage fee. • 4 000136 GENERAL CONDITIONS GOVERNING USE OF FACILITIES The following conditions shall govern the use of facilities, which are administered by the Department of Community Services. AVAILABILITY OF FACILITIES: When use of facilities do not conflict with the City's operations, programs, activities, or maintenance schedule, they shall be available for use by individuals or groups. Reservations will be granted at the discretion of the Director on a first come first served basis at no more than 1 year in advance. Applications for use of public facilities will be approved based on availability, without discrimination or regard to the aplicant's viewpoint or subject matter, including religious or political viewpoints or subject matter. in the case of conflicting usage, facility authorization is at the discretion of the Director, or his designee. GENERAL POLICY• It is the objective of the Department that facilities be used primarily by groups and individuals for community recreation activities regardless of race, color, creed, national origin, religion, sex, economic status, or area of residence of said group and/or individual . ENFORCEMENT OF RULES: The Director or designee, shall enforce or cause to have enforced, the provisions herein, and shall have the authority to deny use of any facility to an individual or group who refuses to comply with the rules and regulations. RIGHT OF FULL ACCESS: The Department has the right of full access to activities at all times to ascertain compliance with rules, regulations, city and state laws. 5 0001637 Hours of Operation: • Dawn - Dusk - Outdoor facilities without lighting 6:00 a.m. - 10:00 p.m. - Outdoor facilities with lighting 8:00 a.m. - 1:00 a.m. - Indoor facilities The above are the standard hours of operation, unless extended by authorization of the Director, or designee. SUPERVISION• A Department of Community Services employee shall be in attendance at any facility whenever it is deemed necessary by the Director or designee. Said Department employee will determine if all rules, regulations, and laws governing use of the facilities are being complied with. However, primary responsibilities for conformance with said rules, regulations, and laws rests with the permittee. SECURITY GUARDS• Security guards are required at all City facilities 'where alcoholic beverages are served, and at other events where the Director or designee deem appropriate. The security guard(s) shall be present for the full length of the reservation, unless amended by the Director or designee. The expense for said security guard(s) shall be assumed by the permittee. Department personnel shall be on duty during facility use, and may request the security guard(s) to remain after the specified hours if, in the opinion of said personnel, the situation requires. In such case, the permittee shall directly assume any expenses for the said security guard(s) , which will be assigned by City staff at an approximate ratio of one (1) security guard per 100 people. CEREMONIAL OCCASIONS: There shall be NO use of City facilities which will unconstitutionally discourage any religious seat, church, or sectarian denomination. Performances, activities, services and presentations conducted or given at facilities '; shall neither unconstitutionally promote, support, or discourage particular religious or philosophical beliefs. . 6 000138 CAPACITY OF FACILITIES: Permittee shall not admit a greater number of persons than the maximum capacity posted or documented on the facility confirmation. CONCESSIONS: The Department reserves all concession rights. Programs, records, tapes, books, and related items may be sold in conjunction with an event if they relate to a performance or meeting if prior written approval has been received. Arrangements must be made in advance, and may be subject to a payment of a percentage of the gross receipts, which will be determined by the Director or designee. (excluding sports tournaments) . ADMISSION CHARGES: Unless specifically stated and approved in the permit, it is understood that activities or events will not be benefit affairs that no admission will be charged, that no tickets will be sold, and that no collection or donation will be made. DISPLAYING COMMERCIAL WRITTEN MATERIALS (SIGNS, POSTERS, ETC. ) : No written commercial or advertising materials or signs shall be . placed in, on, or distributed about parks/facilities. DISPLAYING NON-COMMERCIAL WRITTEN MATERIALS (PAMPHLETS, POSTERS, ETC. Non-commercial written material shall not be affixed to any park structure. Such material is allowed only in conjunction with a permitted event. It shall not be displayed or offered in a manner to cause damage to the park structures, flora, or facilities nor shall the material create a litter, safety, or access problem. The distributor of material shall be responsible for cleaning up any litter caused by the display or distribution of this material . SIGNAGE• Posting of signage related to advertising any event on City-owned property must be authorized by the Director or designee. If advertising signage is approved, signs can only be placed at the facility where the event is to be held. No signage is allowed to be posted on streets, utility poles, traffic signs, or other 7 traffic control devices. Signs can only be posted a maximum of 20 days preceding the event, and are required to be removed immediately after the event. Signs shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Community Services staff for professional quality. Sign maximum size is 20 square feet. Directional and safety signage is allowed at the event site only.',, Refer to the City's Sign Ordinance for further details. STORAGE: No receipt, handling, care, or custody of property of any kind shipped or otherwise delivered to any facility, either prior to, during, or subsequent to the use of facilities by any permittee is allowed, unless authorized by the Director or his designee. The City or it's officers, agents, or employees shall not be liable for any loss, damage, or injury of such property. DAMAGE: Permittee will be responsible for all damage to facility, and shall be responsible for reimbursement to the City for any loss or damage to City property caused- by such use. • CLEAN UP: Permittee is responsible for leaving the facility in a clean and orderly condition. A portion or all of the security/cleaning deposit may be withheld if the facility is not left clean and without damage to furnishings. USE OF EOUIPMENT: Special requests for equipment should be noted on the permit application. DANCES: Dances will be allowed at the discretion of the Director. Persons under 21 will not be permitted at dances serving alcoholic beverages. Dances for minors require chaperones over twenty one (21) years of age to be present during the entire event at a ratio of 1 chaperon to 25 minors, unless amended by the Director. Security guards may be required at the discretion of the Director. • g rnnn. nn DECORATIONS OR STAGE PROPS: • Existing facility decorations may not be removed without the prior approval of the Director or designee. When decorating, DO NOT fasten any decorations to light fixtures. Scotch tape, masking tape, thumb tacks, staples, etc. are not allowed. A special substance called "hold it" may be utilized. Decorations belonging to the permittee must be disposed of immediately after the event. Any decorations left may be discarded by the department, and the removal effort could affect the amount of the security deposit refund. Exit doors, exit lights, fire alarm sending stations, wet standpipe hose cabinets, and fire extinguishers shall not be concealed or obstructed by any decorative material or props. Use of candles or fuel lamps is prohibited. Any special effects, including curtains, hangings, or props shall be made of non-flammable material and approved by the Fire Marshal . PROHIBITED BEHAVIOR: Illegal and immoral activities, the use of obscene language, gestures or behavior shall not be permitted at any time . SMOKING• Smoking is prohibited by Ordinance Number 235 in all City-owned indoor facilities. ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES: Alcoholic beverages are allowed in City parks and facilities (excluding the City Administration Building) . Authorization to sell alcoholic beverages at all City facilities (except the City Administration Building) may be requested in coordination with a facility request application for a special event. Authorization for such permit will be at the discretion of the Director or his designee. If alcoholic beverages are for sale, a permit from the State of California, Alcohol Beverage Control will be required. Proof of liability insurance in the amount of $1 million dollars is also required for the sale of alcoholic beverages, naming the City as additionally insured. No one under the age of 21 is allowed to consume alcoholic beverages. Security guards are required at all indoor events serving alcoholic beverages at a ratio of one security guard to 100 attendants, unless amended by the Director. Security guards may be required at outdoor events, at the discretion of the Director. 9 000141 ABANDONED EQUIPMENT: Any equipment, effects, or decorations of the permittee remaining on the premises for more than two (2) work days after the expiration of the permit will be deemed abandoned and disposed of by the Department. PERMITS AND LICENSES: The permittee has the responsibility to obtain any additional permits and/or licenses required by City ordinances or State laws, and shall furnish evidence of having obtained same to the Department of Community Services. AMPLIFIED MUSIC: Amplified music is allowed in certain City facilities, upon the approval of the Director or designee. Amplified'; music, is not allowed at outside facilities, unless authorized specifically by the Director or designee. Amplified music is allowed in inside facilities from 8:00 a.m. - 1:00 a.m., unless extended by the Director or designee. RULES AND REGULATIONS: In order that activities at City facilities can best be enjoyed by everyone, basic rules of good conduct must be observed. These include, but are not limited to the following: 1 . All City ordinances must be observed. 2 . Gambling, the use of obscene language, dangerous conduct, unusually loud amplified music, or any other activity that creates a disturbance will not be permitted. 3 . The sales of alcoholic beverages without the proper permits is prohibited. 4 . No equipment or furnishings shall be removed from a facility without Director approval . 5. Animals are not allowed in City buildings, except for handicap assistance purposes, unless Director approval ':has been given. 6. Portable barbecues are not allowed on the grass area directly in front of the Atascadero Lake Park Gazebo. Failure to comply with the rules and regulations', may result in termination of a facility use permit. 10 00014 FEE AND PERMIT PROCEDURES 1 . A Facility Use Permit is required for all groups or individuals reserving City facilities. 2 . All use permit requests for usage of City facilities shall be authorized by the Director of Community Services or designee, subject to the availability of the facility. Application forms are available at the City Administration Building, Department of Community Services, 6500 Palma Avenue, Room 106. 3 . A written application is required by applicant before a reservation date can be considered. 4 . Facility confirmations are to be present at the function for which application was applied for In the case of a group or organization, it is recommended that one spokesperson should be designated, and all arrangements should be made through this representative. 5. Reservations shall be made in the order of receipt of application by the Department and subject to the availability of the facility. All required fees must be paid prior to the facility being utilized. Specific date reservations can be submitted a maximum of one (1) calendar year in advance from date of application. Continuing multiple-date reservations can be submitted for a maximum time period of one (1 calendar year in advance from date of application. Recognized non-profit organizations (see Classification of Users Section) continuing multiple-date reservations are to be submitted for a maximum time period of one (1) calendar year in advance beginning in July and ending in June. 6. A non-refundable reservation deposit is required on certain City facilities and is due at the time of permit application submittal . This deposit will be applied towards the facility usage fee if the application is confirmed. If an application is not accepted, the reservation deposit will be refunded to applicant in full . 7. A refundable security deposit may be required at certain facilities and must be paid in full 20 work days prior to the facility being confirmed. This fee shall be refunded only if the facility is left clean and without damage to the building or it's furnishings. The City reserves the right to retain all or part of the security deposit if facility is left uncleaned or damaged. 11 000143 8 . All facility use rental fees are die a minimum of twenty (20) work days prior to the event date. If all rental fees are not paid within this time period, the facility application may be canceled and the reservation deposit (if applicable) will be retained in whole by the City. 9. All other permits, insurance certificates, ,licenses, etc. required in relation to a facility use permit are to be submitted a minimum of twenty (20) working days prior to the event date. 10. Rental time period must include decorating and cleanup time. Rental time is adjusted to the next full half hour. The facility must be vacated promptly at the time specified on the permit. 11 . When applicable, persons utilizing City facilities are to receive necessary City keys from the Department of Community Services immediately prior to the scheduled facility use. All keys must be returned to the Department by the first work day after the rental . A key deposit of $20.00 will be charged. 12 . At certain events, City staff may be assigned to assist at a rate of $10 per hour. This fee must be paid prior to the event date. 13 . Permits granted on a continuing basis are valid for a maximum period of twelve (12) months. 14 . Fees for indoor facilities will be based on a lone hour or two hour minimum rental time frame. 15. A permit will not be issued under the following conditions: Insufficient Notice: When Department personnel cannot be scheduled, facilities prepared, or other conditions relating to such use cannot be completed in the time between the date of the request and the date of the proposed event. For Hazardous Activities: When activities are of a hazardous nature, which may endanger persons or property. Prior Circumstances: When permittee has mistreated a facility or violated facility use policies during a previous occupancy. When Event Publicized Prior to Approval : When an event has been publicized prior to receiving approval for facility use and the facility is not available. 12 0001.44 i 16. Cancellation of Permit: By Permittee: To cancel a reservation or change the date of a facility usage permit, the permittee must give a minimum of twenty (20) work days written notice for all indoor facility reservations and the Sunken Gardens Park. A reservation deposit (if applicable) may be transferred, but is not refundable if permittee cancels.) To change the time of an event, a minimum of 48 hours notice is required. In the case of inclement weather for outdoor facility reservations, the applicant may request a refund of usage fees or reschedule the reservation date. By the City: A permit may be canceled for any of the following conditions: A. if the permit is found to contain false or misleading information. B. The use or proposed use will be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the City or to the efficient operation of the facility for the public welfare. C. Should any individual, group, members or guests willfully or through gross negligence, mistreat the equipment/facility, or violate any of the rules, policies, regulations, teams and conditions established for use of the facility. D. Failure to make rental fee payment within the minimum times provided. E. Ifermittee defaults on or has not completed ed all P P conditions and requirements for use of a facility. F. If the facility is needed for public necessity or emergency use. 13 0001,15 1 FEES CLASSIFICATION OF USERS: Facility users are classified by group type. The classification of users are for the purpose of determining fees and charges for facility rental . When a facility use application is approved, an hourly or set fee shall be charged in accordance with the user's classification. CLASSIFICATION A: A community organization or government agency recognized for fee waiver by the City. This classification is intended for organizations conducting an event, program or service that is not for profit for City residents which are not met by existing City programs. Fees will be waived only if normal staffing patterns are maintained. Organization meetings and fundraising events are excluded from this class. Fee waivers are not available at the Pavilion, City Administration Building, or park barbecue areas. CLASSIFICATION B: This class encompasses incorporated non-profit: organizations recognized for fee discounts by the City. Groups in this class, whose activities are not for profit, provides a community service for the residents of the City of Atascadero. Organizations must have a minimum of 51 percent Atascadero residents as members. (This requirement may be waived if the organization' is providing a public service to Atascadero residents.) This class is intended for the normal activities of non-profit service clubs and similar organizations. Reservations and security deposits will be charged, if applicable. All non profit 501 (c) (3) organizations will be charged the same fee for leasing or usage of public facilities, irrespective of the applicant's viewpoint or subject matter, including religious or political viewpoints or subject matter. CLASSIFICATION C: This class conducts private parties, individual or family use, or activities not open to the general public. This class also includes commercial and private groups whose activities are for financial gain or groups conducting religious, political or union meetings. Reservations and security deposits will; be charged, if applicable. 14 000146 CO-SPONSORED CLASS: 6 Class "A" criteria must be met. Co-sponsored status is extended to 0 groups providing a service with a formal partnership with the City of Atascadero. Co-sponsorship status does not require that normal staffing patterns be maintained. The organization or activity must be organized with the expressed purpose of conducting non- profit programs/services for residents and/or the public. A copy of the group's bylaws and financial records may be required. EXPLANATION OF BASIC FEES Fees have been established considering that only the basic facility is to be furnished. This includes: 1 . Normal utilities 2 . Normal maintenance 3 . Standard table and chair set-up 4 . General supervision 5. Sound set-up with microphone (Pavilion only) ADDITIONAL CHARGES: Charges may be assessed over the standard fee schedule for additional set-up, supervision or technical support provided by the Department. INDOOR FACILITY MINIMUM CHARGE: Fees for indoor facility reservations are based on an hourly rate. There is a minimum of two (2) hours rental fee for the Pavilion Gronstrand and Rotary Rooms and the Administration Building fourth floor Rotunda. All other meeting rooms may be reserved on a one (1) hour minimum rental fee. OUTDOOR FACILITY MINIMUM CHARGE: Usage fees are charged for reserving various City outdoor facilities. Fee rates do not include equipment unless specifically stated. No facility usage fee is charged to City-sponsored softball teams for reserving City softball fields for softball practice. This fee is paid through a portion of the team's league entry fee. 15 000147 • RESERVATION AND SECURITY DEPOSITS: A reservation deposit may be charged when applying for certain facility reservations. This deposit will be applied to the facility usage fee, when paid. If all fees and security deposit are not paid a minimum of twenty (20) work days prior to the event, the full reservation deposit will be retained by the City. A refundable security deposit may be charged for certain facilities. The facility is to be cleaned and returned to its original condition after an event without damage to the facility or it's furnishings. Failure to do so may cause the forfeiture of a portion of or the entire deposit and possible revocation of future permits. Deposits vary depending on the facility reserved and the type of activity held. • 16 00011;.A18 3 FACILITY FEE SCHEDULE SECURITY RESERVATION FACILITY GROUP FEE DEPOSIT DEPOSIT LIGHTS ATASCADERO LAKE PARR: GAZEBO: A -0- -0- -0- (6 a.m.-10 p.m. B $10.00/DAY -0- -0- reservations) C $24 .00/DAY -0- -0- BARBECUES 1 OR 2 : A -0- -0- -0- Approximate Capacity: B $13 .00/DAY -0- -0- 150 people (6 a.m.-10 p.m. C $30.00/DAY -0-. -0- reservations) BARBECUE 3: A -0- -0- -0- Approximate Capacity: B $ 8 .00/DAY -0- -0- 50 people (6 a.m.-10 p.m. C $18 .00/DAY -0- -0- reservations) MAJOR SPECIAL EVENT: A -0- -0- -0- (all open grass areas, B $300 .00 $250.00* $40.00 bbq areas & gazebo) C $600 .00** $250.00* $40.00 *The City reserves the right to increase the amount of security deposit for major special events with expected attendance over 1, 000. **Events requiring paid admission (ie commercial event fundraisers) are subject to a basic rate or 10% of gross ticket sales, whichever is greater. RANGER HOUSE: A -0- $10.00 -0- Maximum Capacity: B $ 5.00/HR $10.00 -0- 27 Dining/Conference 49 Assembly/Dancing C $12 .00/HR $10 .00 -0- (1 hr. min. reservation) CHARLES PADDOCK ZOO: ENTRANCE FEE: Ages 2 & Under $ -0- Ages 3-15 $ 1 .50 Ages 16-64 $ 2 .50 Ages 65 & over $ 1 . 75 STROLLER RENTAL FEE: $ 1 .00 17 i 000 :119 SECURITY RPSERVATION FACILITY GROUP FEE DEPOSIT DPPOSIT LIGHTS CITY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING: 4TH FLOOR ROTUNDA: A $-0- $250.00 $-0- Maximum Capacity: B $10.00/HR $250.00 $40.00 160 Dining/Conference 250 Assembly/Dancing C $24.00/HR $250.00 $40.00 (2 hr. min. reservation) CITY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING (Cont'd) : CONFERENCE ROOM 102/104: A -0- $-0- Maximum Capacity: B $ 5/HOUR $10.00 24 Dining/Conference 49 Assembly/Dancing C $12/HOUR $10.00 (1 hr. min. reservation) 4TH FLOOR CLUB ROOM: A -0- $-0- Maximum Capacity: B $ 5.00/HR $10.00 49 Dining/Conference 49 Assembly/Dancing _ C $12 .00/HR $10.00 (1 hr. min. reservation) ATASCADERO LAKE PARR PAVILION: ROTARY ROOM: A -0- $250 .00 $ -0- (Maximum Capacity: B $15.00/HR $250.00 $ 60 .00 206 Dining/Conference 440 Assembly/Dancing C $36.00/HR $250.00 $ 60.00 (2 hr. min. reservation) GRONSTRAND ROOM: A -0- $250 .00 $ -0- (Maximum Capacity: B $15.00/HR $250 .00 $ 40 .00 100 Dining/Conference 210 Assembly/Dancing C $24 .00/HR $250 .00 $ 40.00 (2 hr. min. reservation) COMMUNITY ROOM: A -0- $ 40 .00 $ -0- (Maximum Capacity: B $15.00/HR $ 40 .00 $ 15.00 62 Dining/Conference 130 Assembly/Dancing C $18 .00/HR $ 40 .00 $ 15.00 (1 hr. min. reservation) KITCHEN: A -0- (1 hr. min. reservation) B $15.00/HR (This room may only be reserved in conjunction C $18.00/HR with another Pavilion Room reservation) 18 1 ©001il-0 SECURITY RESERVATION FACILITY GROUP FEE DEPOSIT DEPOSIT LIGHTS ALVORD FIELD: BASEBALL FIELD: A -0- -0- -0- $10.00/HR B $ 5.00/HR -0- -0- $10.00/HR C $ 6.00/HR -0- -0- $10.00/HR (Field Base Rental (Optional) ALL GROUPS - $200.00 PALOMA CREEK PARR: SOFTBALL FIELDS 1 & 2: A -0- -0- -0- $10.00/HR B $ 5.00/HR -0- -0- $10.00/HR C $ 6.00/HR -0- -0- $10.00/HR Field Base Rental (optional) - ALL GROUPS $200.00 OPEN FIELDS: A -0- -0- -0- -0- B $ 5.00/HR -0- -0- -0- C $ 6.00/HR -0- -0- -0- YOUTH BASEBALL FIELD: A -0- -0- -0- -0- B $ 5.00/HR -0- -0- -0- C $ 6.00/HR -0- -0- -0- BARBECUE AREA: A -0- -0- -0- Approximate Capacity: B $13 .00/DAY -0- -0- 100 people (6 a.m.-10 p.m. C $30.00/DAY -0- -0- reservations) PALOMA EQUESTRIAN ARENA: NO FEE/MEMBERSHIP FOR NON-SPECIAL EVENT USAGE 19 0001:A FACILITY SECURITY RESRRVATION LIGHTS GROUP FEE DEPOSIT DEkOSIT PALOMA CREEK PARR CONT'D SPECIAL EVENTS: A -0- $200.00 -0- B $ 25.00/DAY $200.00 -0- C $ 60 .00/DAY $200.00 -0- Insurance: ALL GROUPS - $1 MILLION DOLLARS Arena Preparation For Special Events: ALL GROUPS - $ 40.00 (optional) TRAFFIC WAY PARK• SOFTBALL FIELDS 1 OR 2: A -0- -0- -0- $10.00/HR B $ 5.00/HR -0- -0- $10.00/HR C $ 6.00/HR -0- -0- $10.00/HR Field Base Deposit: ALL GROUPS $200.00 (optional) SUNKEN GARDENS PARK: A -0- $200.00 $-0- B $ 38 .00/DAY $200.00 $40.00 C $ 90.00/DAY $200.00 $40 .00 ATASCADERO YOUTH RECREATION CENTER: Gymnasium: A $-0- $250 .00 „J,, $-0- B $15.00 $250.00 $40.00 C $24.00 $250.00 $40.00 Dining Room/Kitchen: A $-0- $40 .00 $-0- B $15.00 $40 .00 $40.00 C $18 .00 $40 .00 $40.00 • 20 000152 I SOFTBALL TOURNAMENT GUIDELINES The Atascadero Department of Community Services encourages organized sports tournaments for youth and adults, utilizing City recreational facilities. The following guidelines include application procedures, general information and fees. TOURNAMENT APPLICATION PROCESS: 1 . Submittal of tournament application form, approval of proposed tournament dates and location, and fields used, and payment of application fees. Fees: $ 50 Non-refundable reservation deposit. $150 Rental Fee submitted due 20 working days prior to the event. $ 50 Non-resident tournament fee. 2 . Sponsor to meet with Adult Sports Recreation Supervisor no later than one (1) week prior to tournament to review event schedule, services requested, and options desired. Fees for the services and options are listed below: 40 GROUP FEES SERVICES / OPTIONS A -0- Field use fee B $5.00/HR Field use fee (mandatory) C $7.50/HR Field use fee (mandatory) $30.00/HR Food Concession Fee (optional) $30 .00/HR Alcoholic beverage concession fee (optional) (Alcoholic Beverage Insurance Certificate and Board of Equalization ABC License required) $50 .00/HR Refundable cleaning/security deposit (If fields left in clean condition and there is no damage, deposit is refunded) $10.00/HR Scorekeeper services (optional) $16/FIELD Field preparation (line & drag field) (optional) $10 .00/HR Field lights (optional) $5.00/BAG Field chalk (optional) $10.00/HR Recreation Leader to supervise facility (May be assigned at the discretion of the Director or designee) 21 000153 ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE POLICY Individuals or organizations may request permission to sell alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the use of City facilities (except the City Administration Building) . Permittee shall follow the procedures hereinafter set forth. It shall be the full responsibility of the individual or organization to contact the Department of Alcoholic Beverages to determine the exact requirements pertinent to the type of use. 1 . Groups or individuals wishing to sell alcoholic beverages must submit an application for permit to use City facilities a minimum of twenty (20) work days prior to the event. Applications may be obtained at the City of Atascadero, Department of Community Services, 6500 Palma Avenue, Room 106, Atascadero. 2 . The Director of the Department of Community Services approves or disapproves all requests for the sale of alcoholic beverages at City facilities. 3 . If approved, a letter from the Department of Community Services will be prepared, authorizing the event, and presented to the permittee for submittal to the Department of Alcoholic Beverages, located at 3220 Higuera, San Luis Obispo. 4 . A copy of the Department of Alcoholic Beverages sales permit must be presented to the Department of Commutity Services a minimum of ten (10) work days prior to confirmation for use of the facility. 5. A copy of liability insurance in the amount of $1 million dollars, listing the City as co-insured, for the date(s) of the event, is required prior to confirmation for the use of the facility. 6. Security attendants will be required for any event selling or serving alcoholic beverages in any City building. 22 00015- 4 FOOD SERVICE POLICY FACILITIES SUITED FOR FOOD AND BEVERAGE SERVICE: Atascadero Lake Pavilion: A complete kitchen, offering a- facility for various types of food service. The kitchen is fully equipped with dishes, cups, glasses, silverware, service accessories, pans, and cookware. Administration Building Fourth Floor Kitchen: The kitchen has all major appliances. Accessories such as dishes, utensils, cups, glasses, silverware, and cookware are not available. Picnic Areas• Barbecue pits, electricity outlets (at some sites) , and water are available. FOOD PREPARATION FOR SALEICOLLECTION OF DONATION: Individuals or organizations may request permission to sell or collect donations for providing food services at the above locations. Permittee shall follow the procedures hereinafter set forth. It shall be the full responsibility of the individual or organization to contact the County Health Department to determine the exact requirements pertinent to the type of use. 1 . Individuals or organizations wishing to sell or collect donations for food services must submit an application for permit to use a City facility a minimum of twenty (20) work days prior to the event. Applications may be obtained at the City of Atascadero, Department of Community Services, 6500 Palma Avenue, Room 106, Atascadero. 2 . The Director of the Department of Community Services shall approve or disapprove all requests for the sale or collection of donation for food services at City facilities. 3 . If approved, the applicant will be required to contact the County Health Department regarding receiving a permit for food sales for a temporary event. Their office is located at 2156 Sierra Way, In San Luis Obispo (781-5544) . 4 . A copy of the County Health Department permit must be provided to the Department of Community Services a minimum of ten (10) work days prior to confirmation for use of the facility. 23 • 000-155 a MAJOR SPECIAL EVENT PROCEDURES Individuals, organizations, or businesses may request the use of Atascadero Lake Park or the Sunken Gardens for major ''special events. Applicants may request permission to hold a major '1 special event by submitting an "Application To Use A City Facility For Major Special Events" . Applications are to be submitted to the Department of Community Services office, 6500 Palma Avenue, room 1106 describing the event. Definition of Major Special Event A "Major Special Events" status will be determined by the Director of Community Services or his/her designee based on one or more of the following criteria: 1) Estimated attendance of over 250 people. 2) Fees or donations will be received by the event organizers. 3) Amplified music or entertainers will be present. 4) Paid entertainment will be present. 5) Food or alcoholic beverages are to be sold. 6) Special event involves special security or public safety controls. Approval Process If "Major Special Event Status" is determined, the Director of Community Services will make a recommendation for approval or denial to the Atascadero Parks and Recreation Commission for all first-time external events only. Recommendations and comments will be sought from the Police Department and Fire Department prior to review by the City Council . All continuing or re-occurring events will be approved by the Director of Community Services unless significant changes to the event have been requested by the applicant. No more than six major special events will be allowed at Atascadero Lake Park during the period of thime between and including the Easter holiday weekend and the Labor Day holiday weekend, and a minimum of two (2) weeks is required between major special events. Major Special Events will not be granted if a group picnic area or the gazebo has already been reserved. State and County Requirements and Permits If approved, the applicant will be notified and a confirmed permit will be mailed. All approved major special events will be required to comply with all established local, County and State laws and regulations including but not limited to food sales, alcohol beverage sales and sales tax. . 24 3 Food Sales: the applicant is responsible for acquiring all necessary food sales permits. A copy of the permit must be provided to the City . of Atascadero and posted at the event. Food sales permits may be obtained from the San Luis Obispo County Environmental Health Office located at 2156 Sierra Way, in San Luis Obispo, telephone # 781-5544 . Alcoholic Beverage Sales: The applicant is responsible to provide to the City of Atascadero and to post at the event, a copy of a State Alcoholic Beverages Sales Permit. To secure this permit, the applicant must receive a letter from the City stating permission to sell alcoholic beverages on City property. The letter must be presented to the State Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control located at 3220 South Higuera, Room #305, San Luis Obispo. Sales Tax: Intended for applicants that sell any personal property that will require the application of sales or use tax. You may obtain information regarding the application of tax to your business by contacting the State Board of Equalization (489-6293) , located at 1303 Grand Avenue, Suite 115, Arroyo Grande. it is the responsibility of the applicant to notify any and all vendors that may participate in the proposed special event about the sales tax requirements. City of Atascadero Requirements In addition, by abiding to all pertinent state and county laws and regulations, the event holder must also abide by all applicable City ordinances, policies and procedures listed below. Additional requirements may be applied at the discretion of the Director of Community Services or his/her designee and/or the Police or Fire Chief or his/her designee. Business License: The applicant is responsible to obtain a City of Atascadero Business License if any food, personal property or services will be sold. The applicant must provide a copy of their business license to the Community Services Department office. Business licenses may be obtained at the City of Atascadero Finance Department (461-5017) located at 6500 Palma Avenue, Room #201B. Non-profit organizations conducting fund-raisers may obtain this permit at no cost after submitting proof of non-profit status. Liability Insurance: The applicant is responsible for obtaining a comprehensive liability insurance policy in the amount of $1,000, 000, listing the City of Atascadero as additional insured. A certificate of Insurance must be provided to the City of Atascadero at least ten (10) working days prior to the event. 25 0001�l Plot Plan/Facility Diagram: It is the responsibility of the applicant to submit a plot plan of the proposed major special event depicting the • approximate location of all activities, booths, vehicles, tables, and other related equipment, at least 20 working days prior to the event date. City staff will meet with the applicant to review the plan and make any necessary revisions. Clean-up/Trash Disposal: It is the general policyof the City of Atascadero that the facility be returned in the same or better condition than received. It will be the responsibility of the event coordinator to remove all refuse generated by the major special event. Failure of the event holder to leave the park in a clean and unlaittered condition may result in forfeiture of all or part of the security deposit. A minimum of one commercial grade, three yard capacity,' refuse container must be provided by the event coordinator. The container(s) is to be delivered no more than two (2) days before the event and picked up no later than two (2) days following the event. Refuse containers may be obtained at Wil-Mar Disposal (466-3636) , located at $835 Traffic Way, Atascadero. Confirmation of refuse container rental most be provided to the City at least 20 working days prior to the event date. Trash pickup and emptying of facility trash cans during and after the event will be the responsibility of the event holder. Recycling containers must also be provided at all approved major special events held at City facilities. The event holder is responsible for all fees associated with renting said equipment. Portable Sanitation Units: Portable sanitation units will be required at all major special events conducted at City facilities. The number of portable sanitation units will be determined by the number of expected persons, length of event and the type of activity. A minimum of two portable sanitation units are to be provided at any event of 250 people or less. Two additional units will be required for every additional 250 persons expected. Portable sanitation units can be rented from several local companies, and confirmation or rental must be provided to the City no later than 20 working days prior to the event. The units are to be delivered no more than two days before the event, and ''must be picked up no later than two days after the event. The event holder is responsible for all fees associated with renting said equipment. Signage: All signs posted for major special events held at City facilities must conform to the City's sign ordinance and be approved in advance by the Director of Community Services or his/her designee. Below is a brief outline of the guidelines regarding special events signs. 1 . Signs will not be allowed that are off-site from ''the actual event. For example; signs in the Sunken Gardens cannot advertise an event at Atascadero Lake Park. . 26 00011 8 3 2 . Signs providing directions to an event are not allowed. Directional signs are only allowed on the actual event site. 3 . No signs can be posted on trees, utility poles, traffic signs or any other traffic control devices. 4 . Portable signs such as sandwich boards are not allowed. 5. Temporary event signs are permitted as long as they are less than twenty (20) square feet, are not posted more than twenty (20) days prior to the event, and are removed immediately after the event. Decorations: Attaching decorations to trees, signs, pole, buildings, tables or other park equipment with nails, tacks, staples or eyebolts is strictly prohibited. All decorations must be removed immediately after the event. Event Security: Any Major Special Event that includes alcoholic beverages and/or amplified music will be required to have a minimum of two state certified security guards on site during the entire event for every 500 people expected. Additional security guards may be required at the discretion of the Director of Community Services or his/her designee. Please note that amplified music is not allowed at Atascadero Lake Park, unless permission has been granted by the Director. Equipment Storage: No equipment is to be stored at the facility, either prior to or after the event. All delivery, set-up, tear down and removal of equipment must occur on the day of the event. The City of • Atascadero will not be responsible for any equipment left at the facility. Parking: At the discretion of the Director of Community Services, special arrangements for parking such as off-site parking lots and shuttle service may be required. For all major special events, parking spaces must be reserved exclusively for Charles Paddock Zoo visitors. Parking lot attendants may be required. At no time can parking space be reserved exclusively for patrons of the Major Special Event. All City park facility parking spaces are to remain available for general park use. Vehicles are not allowed onto grass areas unless the applicant receives expressed permission from the Director of Community Services. Street Closure: Any requests for road closure are to be listed on a road closure request form and submitted along with the special event application form. Road closure requests must include suggested alternate routes, an emergency access plan and proposed traffic controls. Street closure requests will be reviewed by City staff and the applicant will be notified about special traffic control requirements. 27 • OQQ1C---*9 Fees and Charges A non-refundable reservation deposit will be charged at the time an application is submitted. Applications for use of City facilities will not be accepted without the correct reservation deposit, for the facility requested. This deposit will be applied to the facility use fees when paid. A security deposit will be charged for all major special events. This security deposit is due along with all other facility use fees a minimum of twenty (20) working days prior to the event date. The entire security deposit will be refunded to the applicant if the facility is returned clean and in its original condition. The cost for any damages or additional fees will be deducted from the securitydeposit. On Site Staff Supervision: At certain events, City staff may be assigned to assist at a rate of $10.00 per hour. If ',applicable, this fee must be paid prior to the event. Emergency Services: Any extraordinary police or fire services required as a result of the event may be charged (in full) to the event organizer (riot, etc.) Fire Department Permit Inspection Fees: if a permit is required by the City of Atascadero Fire Department for inspection of the major special event site, specific fees may apply. Examples of permit inspection fees include but are not limited to inspection of tents over, 200 square feet, inspection of circuses and use of open flame in an assembly area. Any City staff time out of the normal routine necessary for clean-up, preparations or repairs will be charged directly to the applicant at a rate of $20 .00 per hour. Any City equipment requested for the event will be charged to the applicant at the rate established in the City's facility rental policies and procedures. c: �wp5ljfacpolic.195 10 28 00011*i0 It@m #: C-4-A MEMORANDUM To: Brady Cherry, Community Services Director Date: 2/16/95 From: Art Montandon, City Attorney l Chiu Subject: Facility policies, procedures and fees, ceremonial procedures There are amendments proposed to the above which result from a dialogue with Trey Littlejohn. He was concerned that the former policy may have discriminated against religious organizations. I was concerned that the City not violate the constitution, both state and federal, regarding religious activities in City facilities. The basic constitutional principle comes from the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. It states that Congress "shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof". The California Constitution states in Article 1, Section 4 that "free exercise and enjoyment of religion without discrimination or preference are guaranteed. The legislature 'shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion". The State Constitution strictly prohibits any governmental support for religious purposes (Cal. Const. Art. XVI, Section J). The basic rule to apply is the City should do nothing to promote or discourage religious beliefs. As such, religious organizations should be treated like any other user of City facilities. If they are non-profit, they should receive non-profit rates. They should not receive reservation status of greater or lesser duration than other organizations. If you have remaining questions, please contact me. ARM:cw REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item: C-5 From: Andrew J. Takata, City ManagerMeeting Date: 3/14/95 G®� SUBJECT: Citizen Task Force for Economic Recovery RECOMMENDATION: Approve proposed membership list. BACKGROUND: At the Council's Mid-Year Budget Study of March 2nd, staff was directed to propose options to the Council pertaining to the appointment of a task force to discuss and develop economic recovery recommendations. This task force could take many different forms. To achieve what staff believes to be the best cross section of community representation, a list of over 90 non-profit organizations was utilized. After reviewing the list, staff removed any fraternal organizations and utilized those that were strictly non-profit, community-oriented. Following is the recommended list of appointees (23) to the task force: Appointee Affiliation 2 City Council 3 Members-at-large, to be appointed by those Council members not - on the task force 1 Planning Commission 1 Parks & Recreation Commission 1 Economic Round Table 1 Atascadero Women's Club 1 Atascadero Rotary Club 1 Atascadero Lion's Club 1 Atascadero Land Preservation Society 1 Atascadero Kiwanis Club 1 Atascadero Homeowners Association 1 Atascadero Historical Society 1 Atascadero Board of Realtors 1 Atascadero Quota Club 1 S.L.O. County Zoological Society 1 Atascadero Chamber of Commerce 1 Atascadero Business Improvement Association= 1 Business Manager, Atascadero Unified School Ibistrict 2 Former City department heads who reside in Atascadero AT:cw 3 J Clubs & Organizations (update -1/09/95) Name Representative Mail Address City Tel -------------------------------------- ----------P---------------- 4-9 Clubs Cooperative Extension Farm & Home Advisor San Luis Obispo 78 10 A.C.E.S. An Myking P.O. Box 40 Atascadero 461 AFAR Katy Olsen, Pres 5935 Traffic Way Atascadero 466-5403 American Cancer Society 1124 B Nipomo St San Luis Ob. 543-1481 American Lung Assn 1216 Morro Road San Luis Ob American Red Cross P. 0. Box 565 Atascadero 466-2503 Archers & Bow Hunters Terry Lente Atascadero 461-1022 Arthritis Foundation of Santa Barb/SLO Cty 115 Toro St San Luis Ob Assoc. Unions of Atas.State Hosp. Jay Salter 10333 E1 Camino Rea! Atascadero 461-2493 Atas. Art Club George Asdel, President P. 0. Box 28 Atascadero 466-0464 Atas. Assn. of Retired Persons Nellie Kennedy, President 7484 Pismo Ave. Atascadero 466-6734 t,-Ras. Board of Realtors Cindy Snowily, Executive Officer P. 0. Box 48 Atascadero 466-9200 Atas. Colony Days Committee Barbie Butz P.O. Box 1913 Atascadero 461-1234 Atas. Community Band Irene T. Bishop, President 7151Serna Court Atascadero 466-4370 e Atas. Elks Lodge #2733 John Nelson, Exhalted Ruler P.O. Box 1085 Atascadero 466-8270 Atas. Emblem Club No. 542 Kendra Sheridan L 6351 Olmeda Atascadero 466-3292 Atas. Environmental Club Atas. High School 1 High School Hill Atascadero Atas. FFA Boosters 1 High School Hill Atascadero 466-5272 Atas. Foursquare Church 2100 Ramona Road Atascadero 466-3191 Atas. Golf Club- P. 0, Box 1087 Atascadero 466-8848 Atas, Grange X563 Robert Shaffer P. 0. Box 904 Atascadero 466-9929 Atas. High Earth Club Roger Zachary, Advisor 1 High School Hill Atascadero 466-1705 Atas. High School Boosters P.O. Box 71 Atascadero 466-6030 Atas. High School Donn Clickard, A.D. i High School Hill Atascadero 466-1705 Atas. High School Key Club Kathleen Aragon, advisor #1 High School Hill Atascadero 466-0393 `-ftas. Historical Society Ursula Luna, Secretary P.O. Box 1047 Atascadero 466- metas. Homeowners Assn. President Tim O'Keefe P.O. Box 322 Atascadero 366 Atas. Horseman's Assoc. Karen Reiner 9519 Carmel Rd. Atascadero 466-0 Atas. Jaycees Jessa Spomer P.O. Box 2586 Atascadero 466-1836 Atas. Jr. High School 6401 Lewis Ave Atascadero 466-0393 Atas. Jr. Women's Club Lori Blakeman P. 0. Box 460 Atascadero 466-3348 L-Atas. Kiwanis Club Tom Ferrell P. 0. Box 370 Atascadero - 466-2051 Atas. Land Preservation Society Marge Mackey (ALPS) P. 0. Box 940 Atascadero Atas, Library 6850 Morro Road Atascadero 466-0142 Atas, Lion's Club Kevin McClain P. 0. Box 605 Atascadero 466-7087 Atas. Loyal Order of Moose Wallie Banner P. 0. Box 254 Atascadero 466-5121 Atas. Masonic Lod.F&M 493 Frank Franscioni 6351 Olmeda Atascadero 236-3885 Atas. PTA/PTSA One High School Hili Atascadero 466-0393 Atas. Racing Pigeon Club Gene Hart 8465 Marchant Ave. Atascadero 466-1603 14tas. Rotary Club John Vial P. 0. Box 100 Atascadero 461-0674 Atas. Tennis Club P. 0. Box 1590 Atascadero Atas. Women of the Moose Lynda Barga P.O. Box 231 Atascadero 438-4420 "tas. Women's Club P. 0. Box 1044 Atascadero Audubon Society, North Coast Chapter Lorene Calreba 9050 Juniper Ave Atascadero Better Business Bureau Marge Greene, President P.O. Box 746 Santa Barbara 963-8657 Boy Scouts of America Santa Lucia Council 1123 Mill St, San Luis Obispo 543-5766 Business & Professional Women's Club 1903 Park St. Paso Robles 238-3407 Central Coast Golf Club P. 0. Box P Atascadero Central Coast Mothers of Twins Ginger Bales P 0 Box 265 Templeton 434-1356 Cuesta Gem & Mineral Club W. Chaffin P. 0. Box 513 Atascadero 466-2291 Democratic Club of Atascadero Roseann Alderson P. 0. Box 1231 Atascadero 466-4318 Page 1 0001:62 Democratic Headquarters 890 Mill St. San Luis•Ob 541-078: Escuela Del Rio (Atas.Com. for Educ) P 0. Box 6007 Atascadero 466-443: Fifty Plus (50+) Lynn Colliard Paso Robles 239-934 *irceds Atascadero Library Sarah Gronstrand, President 466-7471e Farmers of America Al DeRose/Jerry Dean 1 High School Hill Atascadero 466-034:cof San Luis Obispo Sandra Norton P.O. Box 1342 San Luis . (805) 51 I.O.O.F. 1340, Nac.Lodge Tom Parks P. 0. Box 272 Atascadero 466-536' Knights of Columbus Santa Lucia Council 112400 Santa Lucia- Atascadero '4664421 Multiflora Garden Club Catherine Ramsey 461-934+ Newcomer's Club Shelia Wheeler, Pres. 7305 San Gabriel Rd. Atascadero 466-403: North Co. Christian School Cayce Shannon, Administrator P.O. Box 6017 Atascadero 466-445' North Co. Newcomers Sheila Wheeler, President 3760 Ardilla Rd. Atascadero 466-403: North County Christian School Tom Balentine P: O:,Bo: 6017 Atascadero 466-445' North County Cycling Club Wes Eakeymanra? 8710 E1 Camino Real" Atascadero 466-2361 North County Farmers.Mkt Bill Berry 461-347' North County Model Railroaders Assn Jim Fitzgerald 2424 Alturas Rd Atascadero 466-1751 North County Multiflora Club Catherine Ramsey 466-272' North County Wosen's Resource Ctr P. 0. Boz 2155 Atascadero 461-133- North Cuesta Audubon Society Roger Zachary, President 1800 Traffic Way Atascadero 466-622: Oak Tree Alliance 1700 San Ramon Atascaoero 466-500: Order of Eastern Star, Atas. Chapter Carol Tucker P.O. Box 84 Atascadero 238-478: Parents without Partners Louise Jackson P. 0. Box 992 San Luis Obispo . 544-891: Pioneer Players Mary Hanson P.-0. Bo 852 Templeton 434-262, Quota Club Cathy Williams, Pres. P. 0. Box 1622 Atascadero 466-966; Red Wind Foundation P 0 Box 518 Santa Marg. Republican Headquarters Del Knight 1141 Marsh St. San Luis Obispo, 461-94 .! Republican Women's Club Jackie Vanderpool P-O. Bos16b4- Atascadro 461-072. Santa Lucia Sportsmen's Assoc Inc 10404 Santa Clara Rd Atascadero 466-459: Santa Margarita Moose Lodge 22514 El Camino Real Santa Marg. S to Margarita Civic Assn P. 0. Box U Santa Marg. r Citizens;,United P. 0. Box 239 Atascadero 466-467, Lord a 65 Brewer St. Templeton SLO CO. .Builders Exchange 5407-El Camino Real Atascadero 466-087 SLO Co. Genealogical Society, Inc. William Butz, President P.O. Box 4 Atascadero 239-272 SLO County Cattlewomen Miriam Butler 1394 Andrews St. San Luis Obis Sons of the Amer. Revolution Roger Cook 10600 Colorado Rd. Atascadero 466-178 Tiger Clubs (Cub Scouts), Nancy Pullen P. 0. Box 909 Santa Marg. _ 438-555 Toastmasters Club 903 Norm Young Atascadero 466-063 Tres Condados Girl Scout Council, Inc. Alexis Cartter 1264 Higuera Suite 107 San Luis Obispo 541-833, Tri Counties Better Bus. Bureau Marge Green P. 0. Box 746 SantaBarbara 963-865" Vaqueras DelCamino P. 0. Box 413 Atascadero 466-098 VFW 2835 Templeton Poste& Aux Templeton Legion Hall Templeton VFW Post 2814 & Ladies Aux. P. 0. Bos 174 Atascadero 466-330 Western Resource Center Dr. Fred Abitia 12255 Viejo Camino '' Atascadero 466-858 Wranglerettes LeeAnn Feliz P. 0. Bos 1177. Atascadero 466-955 \/Zoological Society of SLO Lindsasy Hampton P. 0. Box 8 Atascadero 461-926- a Page 2 000163 CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS: Add Urgency Item Added to Regular Business by unanimous motion of the Council - Item #C-6 RESOLUTION NO. 28-95 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA, PROCLAIMING THE EXISTENCE OF A LOCAL EMERGENCY WHEREAS, Government Code Section 8630 et seq. and Title 4, Chapter 4 of the Atascadero Municipal Code empowers the City Council to proclaim the existence or threatened existence of a local emergency when the City is affected or is likely to be affected by a public calamity or crippling disaster; and WHEREAS, conditions of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property have arisen within the City of Atascadero because of devastating floods resulting from heavy rainfall; and WHEREAS, the City Manager, as the designated Director of Emergency Services, did find that the aforesaid conditions of extreme peril warranted and necessitated the proclamation of the existence of a local emergency; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 4-4.07 of the Atascadero Municipal Code, the City Manager did, on Thursday, March 9, 1995, declare a state of local emergency • for the City of Atascadero. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Atascadero as follows: SECTION 1 . It is hereby proclaimed that a local emergency did exist in the City of Atascadero as a result of devastating floods. SECTION 2. The state of local emergency was declared at 5:00 p.m. Thursday, March 10, 1995 by Andrew J. Takata, City Manager. Said proclamation is hereby ratified by the City Council SECTION 3. It is hereby proclaimed that the local emergency was terminated at 8:00 a.m. on Monday, March 13, 1995. On motion by Councilperson and seconded by Councilperson , the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Resolution No. 28-95 Page Two ADOPTED: ATTEST: CITY OF ATASCADERO By: LEE PRICE, City Clerk R. DAVID BEWLEY, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: ARTHER R. MONTANDON, City Attorney