HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 08/09/1994 PUBLIC REVIEW COPY
Mean do not remove
from counter
AGENDA
ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
CITY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING
6500 PALMA AVENUE, 4TH FLOOR ROTUNDA ROOM
August 9, 1994
7:00 P.M.
This agenda is prepared and posted pursuant to the requirements of Government Code
Section 54954.2. By listing a topic on this agenda, the City Council has expressed its
intent to discuss and act on each item. In addition to any action identified in the brief
general description of each item, the action that may be taken shall include: A referral to
staff with specific requests for information; continuance; specific direction to staff
concerning the policy ormission of the item,discontinuance of consideration;authorization
to enter into negotiations and execute agreements pertaining to the item, adoption or
approval,• and, disapproval.
Copies of the staff reports or other documentation relating to each item of business
referred to on the agenda are on file in the office of the City Clerk (Room 208) and in the
Information Office (Room 103), available for public inspection during City Hall business
hours. The City Clerk will answer any questions regarding the agenda.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to
participate in a City meeting or other services offered by this City,please contact the City
Manager's Office ((805) 461-5010) or the City Clerk's Office ((805) 461-5074). Notifica-
tion at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time when services are needed will assist the
City staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility
to the meeting or service.
RULES OF PUBLIC PARTICIPATION:
* Members of the audience may speak on any item on the agenda.
* A person may speak for five (5) minutes.
* No one may speak for a second time until everyone wishing to speak has had
an opportunity to do so.
* No one may speak more than twice on any item.
* Council Members may question any speaker; the speaker'may respond but,
after the allotted time has expired, may not initiate further";discussion.
* The floor will then be closed to public participation and':, open for Council
discussion.
CALL TO ORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS is
COMMUNITY FORUM:
The City Council values and encourages exchange of ideas and comments from
you, the citizen. The Community Forum period is provided to receive comments from
the public on matters other than scheduled agenda items. To increase the effective-
ness of Community Forum, the following rules will be enforced:
* A maximum of 30 minutes will be allowed for Community Forum, unless
Council authorizes an extension.
* All remarks shall be addressed to Council, as a whole, and not to any individual
member thereof.
* No person shall be permitted to make slanderous, profane or personal remarks
against any elected official, commissions and staff.
A. CONSENT CALENDAR:
All matters listed under Item B, Consent Calendar, are considered to be routine, and
will be enacted by one motion in the form listed below. There will be no separate
discussion on these items. A member of the Council or public may, by request, have
any item removed from the Consent Calendar, which shall then be reviewed and acted
upon separately after the adoption of the Consent Calendar:
1 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES -July 26, 1994
2. RESOLUTION NO. 77-94 - Designating a stop sign on Atascadero Mall at
Atascadero Avenue
3. RESOLUTION NO. 78-94 - Designating a stop sign on La Canada at Del Rio
4. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 11-90, 8065 AMAPOA - Acceptance of Final Parcel
Map to subdivide one lot into four (4) airspace condominiums and a common
area (Shutt)
5. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 12-90, 8045 AMAPOA - Acceptance of Final Parcel
Map to convert an existing four-unit project into airspace condominiums (Shutt)
6. SCHEDULE DATES FOR INTERVIEWING APPLICANTS TO THE PLANNING
COMMISSION AND TRAFFIC COMMITTEE
7. RESOLUTION NO. 82-94 - Adopting increased stipend for the elected City Clerk
2
B. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. SOLID WASTE PLANNING (AB 939) [Staff recommends continuation of items
A & B to the 8/23/94 City Council meeting]
A. Resolution No. 80-94 - Adopting the Source Reduction & Recycling
Element (Cont'd 2/22/94)
B. Resolution No. 81-94 - Adopting the Household Hazardous Waste
Element (Cont'd 2/22/94)
C. Resolution No. 79-94 - Adopting the Nondisposal Facility Element
C. REGULAR BUSINESS:
1. GENERAL PLAN STUDY SESSION - To review the Urban Services Line policies
and possible initiation of amendments to the Land Use Element
D. COMMITTEE REPORTS (The following represent ad hoc or standing commit-
tees. Informative status reports will be given, as felt necessary.):
1 . S.L.O. Council of Governments/S.L.O. Regional Transit Authority
2. City/School Committee
3. County Water Advisory Board/Nacimiento Water Purveyors Advisory Group
4. Economic Round Table
5. Finance Committee
6. Highway 41 Realignment Community Advisory Committee
E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION:
1. City Council: Appoint a City representative to the A.P.C.D.
2. City Attorney
3. City Clerk
4. City Treasurer
5. City Manager
F. ADJOURNMENT:
The City Council will adjourn to a Special Joint Meeting with the Paso Robles
City Council at 7:00 p.m. on Thursday, August 11, 1994, to discuss:
1) Economic Development in the North County
2) Solid Waste Issues and Planning
3) Proposed Expansion of the Salinas River Dam
Said meeting will be held at the Atascadero Lake Park Pavilion, 9315 Pismo
Street, Atascadero, and is open to the public.
3
1
Agenda Item: B-1
Meeting Date: 08/09/94
1
ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL
JULY 26, 1994
MINUTES
The Mayor called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Councilper on Carden led the
Pledge of Allegiance.
i
ROLL CALL:
Present: Councilmembers Bewley, Borgeson, ! Luna and Mayor
Bewley
Absent: Councilmember Highland (vacation)
Also Present: Muriel "Micki" Korba, City Treasurer nd Lee Price, City
Clerk
I
Staff Present: Andy Takata, City Manager; Henry gingen, Community
Development Director; Art Montandon, City Attorney;
Brady Cherry, Director of Communilty Services; Brad
Whitty, Finance Director; Captain lFred Motlo, Fire
Department; Bud McHale, Police Chief and John Neil,
Assistant City Engineer
i
{
COUNCIL COMMENTS:
Councilmembers Luna and Johnson expressed appreciation to theFire Department for
response to the Highway 41/Los Altos fire. Councilmember Lura praised residents
in the area, as well, for weed abatement. I
3
Mayor Bewley announced that the City would send an expressii n of condolence to
Paso Robles City Councilmember Chris Iversen who lost his teenage son in a recent
tragedy. He noted that the City would also make a donation to khe Michael Iversen
Memorial Fund (F.F.A. - Paso Robles High School).
i
CC 07/26/94
Page 1
COMMUNITY FORUM:
Ray Jansen, 6655 Country Club Drive, encouraged youth participation in the
improvement of the Masonic Temple as a recreational center. He urged the City to
provide youth with the inspiration, supervision and facilities and remarked that "where
there is a will, there is a way".
A. COMMITTEE REPORTS (The following represent ad hoc or standing commit-
tees. Informative status reports will be given, as felt necessary.):
1. S.L.O. Council of Governments (COG)/Regional Transit Authority
(SLORTA) - Councilman Carden reported on the meeting of July 13,
1994 meeting and mentioned that agenda items included a SLORTA
performance analysis and funding. He also noted that COG would be
discussing appointments to the Air Pollution Control Board and requested
that staff place on the next City Council agenda an item relating to City
representation on the Board. The matter was set for August 9, 1994.
2. City/School Committee - Councilman Johnson reported that the July
meeting had been canceled due to a lack of available school district
representatives and noted that the meeting would be rescheduled for the
month of August.
3. Traffic Committee - Councilman Luna provided background for
recommendations coming before the City Council on August 9, 1994 ;
relating to requests for cross walks at San Benito and Traffic Way. In
addition, he also mentioned that the Super 8 Motel on Morro Road had
requested directional signage on El Camino Real. He suggested that the
Council send a letter to Caltrans supporting the request. There was
consensus to direct staff to draft a letter of support for the mayor's
signa ture.
4. County Water Advisory Board - Councilman Luna announced that the
Board would meet on the first Wednesday in September.
5. Economic Round Table - Councilman Johnson reported that the round
table had met on July 20th and had received the consultant's status
report on economic study. He noted that work had begun on a property
availability list to assist in the location of businesses in Atascadero.
6. Highway Hi hwa 41 Realignment Community Advisory Committee - See Item
#D-1 .
CC 07/26/94
Page 2
B. CONSENT CALENDAR:
• 1 . CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - June 28 1994
2. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - July 8, 1994 (Special Meeting)
3. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - July 12, 1994
4. CITY TREASURER'S REPORT - June, 1994
5. RESOLUTION NO. 43-94 - Placing the annual payment for Assessment District
#7 (Santa Rosa Rd.) on the Property Taxes for Fiscal Year, 1994-95
6. RESOLUTION NO. 73-94 - Designating a street name (Cole Court) to serve a
five-lot subdivision located at 8625 Portola Road (Tract 2153)
7. RESOLUTION NO. 75-94 - Adopting the Fiscal Year 1994-95 annual spending
limit
8. AUTHORIZE CITY CLERK TO EXTEND RECRUITMENTS FOR PARKS &
RECREATION COMMISSION AND COMMUNITY SERVICES FOUNDATION
BOARD OF DIRECTORS (Verbal)
• MOTION: By Councilman Luna, seconded by Councilman Carden to approve
the Consent Calendar; motion carried 4:0 by roll call vote.
C. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. RESOLUTION NO. 72-94 - Confirming the cost of weed abatement
Captain Motlo provided a brief staff report and answered questions. There was no
public testimony.
MOTION: By Councilman Luna, seconded by Councilman Johnson to adopt
Resolution No. 72-94 confirming the costs of weed abatement;
motion passed 4:0 by roll call vote.
2. NORTH COUNTY WOMEN'S SHELTER: Annual grantee performance report for
Community Development Block Grant
Henry Engen presented the staff report and noted that there was no formal action
required of the Council.
CC 07/26/94
• Page 3
Don Dana, People's Self-Help Housing, provided a status report on the grant
application and funding. He reported that the escrow would close soon and work will
begin soon on the shelter.
Eileen Allan, Director of North County Women's Shelter, expressed appreciation to the
City Council for their support of the grant application. In addition, she highlighted
programs and services.
---End of Public Testimony---
The City Council received the report. There was no formal action.
D. REGULAR BUSINESS:
1. MAGDALENA AND MAGNOLIA AVENUES: Consideration of neighborhood sur-
vey and recommendation on ending streets in cul-de-sac as part of Hwy. 41
realignment
Henry Engen provided the staff report and results of a neighborhood survey. The City
Council received the report. Staff was directed to forward a request to Caltrans to
modify the project to end Magdalena and Magnolia in cul-de-sacs.
E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION:
1. City Council
Councilman Carden requested that staff schedule a study session regarding Urban
Services Line expansions in the north and south ends of the City. The matter was set
for August 9, 1994.
Councilman Carden requested a status report on the State budget and its' predicted
impact on cities. Andy Takata reported.
Councilman Johnson reported that he had received calls from citizens expressing
opposition to the "Beer Fest" scheduled for September 17, 1994 at the Atascadero
Lake Park. He asked the Police Chief to summarize the history of alcohol abuse and
related crimes in City parks. Chief McHale noted that alcohol-related crimes in 1992
and 93 had dropped. He explained that the had contacted Paso Robles Police Chief
John Nelson who reported that eh City of Paso's Wine Festival has approximately
10,000 participants each year and has not had any significant difficulties. Chief
McHale noted that police personnel would be meeting with the sponsors (Elks) to
ensure that controls are in place and that there will be adequate security.
CC 07/26/94
Page 4
Councilman Johnson suggested that if there are problems associ=ated with the Beer
Fest, that they be addressed at the Council level.
2. City Clerk
The City Clerk mentioned that she would be bringing back suggested dates for
Planning Commission and Traffic Committee interviews at the next meeting.
3. City Manager
Andy Takata provided a status report on signage modifications in the Las Encinas
Assessment District. In addition, he explained that the budget session previously
scheduled for 6:00 p.m. on August 9th would be postponed until August 23, 1994
and highlighted agenda items scheduled for the next regular meeting.
PUBLIC COMMENT:
Whitey Thorpe, 8025 Santa Ynez, shared concern relating to bicyclists who fail to
observe stop signs and who ride bikes without reflectors. He urged the City Council
to protect cyclists and drivers alike by providing bicycle safety education to the youth.
F. CLOSED SESSION:
At 7:45 p.m., the City Council adjourned to a Closed Session for the following
purpose:
1) Conference with Legal Counsel - Consideration as to whether the City
should initiate litigation
At 7:55 p.m., the City Attorney reported that the City Council had discussed a matter
of potential litigation. There was no action.
THE MEETING WAS ADJOURNED. THE CITY COUNCIL WILL MEET ON TUESDAY,
ON AUGUST 9, 1994 AT 7:00 P.M.
MINUTES RECORD AND PREPARED BY:
LEE PRICE, City Clerk
CC 07/26/94
Page 5
•
I
j
I
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL Meeti;g Date: 8-9-94
CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item: A-2
Through: Andrew J. Takata, City Manager
Via: Henry Engen, Director of Community D(velopment �
From: Valerie Humphrey, Engineering Division
j
SUBJECT i
Establishment of Stop intersection.
I
RECOMMENDATION 1
The Traffic Committee recommends that Council a opt Resolution
No. 77-94 creating a stop intersection on Atascader Mall near the
entrance to Atascadero High School.
DISCUSSION
I
This area has long been a concern due to the high traffic
volume on Atascadero Avenue and the high vehicle and pedestrian
traffic generated by the high school and North C unty Christian
School.
After lengthy discussion the Committee agreed that requiring
traffic to stop at this location on Atascadero Mall would allow for
safer pedestrian movement in addition to requiring vehicles to stop
at all legs of this intersection.
I
OPTIONS
i
1) Approve Resolution No. 77-94
2) Deny Resolution No. 77-94
3) Return to Traffic Committee for further consideration.
FISCAL IMPACT
t
The cost of this installation is estimated to b� approximately
$150. 00 to be paid out of current fiscal year budg�ted funds.
E
!I001)(A
RESOLUTION NO. 77-94
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO
DESIGNATING A STOP INTERSECTION ON ATASCADERO MALL
WHEREAS, Section 4-2 .801 et seq. of the Atascadero Municipal
Code allows the City Traffic Engineer to determine the location of
STOP intersections, and to place and maintain appropriate signs or
markings indicating the same; and
WHEREAS, the Atascadero Traffic committee has recommended that
Establishing a STOP intersection on Atascadero Mall will improve a
hazardous traffic situation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Atascadero
directs the City Traffic Engineer to place and maintain appropriate
signs or markings indicating a STOP intersection at the location
listed above and further described on attached Exhibit A.
On motion by Councilmember , and seconded by
Councilmember , the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted
in its entirety on the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ADOPTED:
ATTEST:
LEE PRICE, City Clerk R. DAVID BEWLEY, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ARTHER R. MONTANDON
City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
HENRY ENGEN
Director of Community Development
wilF��I
EXHIBIT A
Resolution No. 77-94
G '
NCCS
PROPOSED STOP SIGN �
i
HIGH SCHOOL �
C) S�
f
i
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL Meeti g Date: 8-9-94
CITY OF ATASCADERO Agend Item: A-3
I
Through: Andrew J. Takata, City Manager
i
Via: Henry Engen, Director of Community D(!velopment
From: Valerie Humphrey, Engineering Division
SUBJECT
i
Establishment of Stop intersection.
RECOMMENDATION
The Traffic Committee recommends that Council a opt Resolution
No. 78-94 creating a stop intersection on La Canad Avenue at the
intersection with Del Rio.
DISCUSSION
i
The installation of this stop intersection was recommended by
the traffic engineer in conjunction with the repavIing of the Las
Encinas area. La Canada Avenue is a short cul-de-s4c which enters
Del Rio on a curve creating a sight hazard.
OPTIONS
i
1
1) Approve Resolution No. 78-94
2) Deny Resolution No. 78-94
3) Return to Traffic Committee for further consideration.
FISCAL IMPACT
This installation is funded through the Assessment District at
no cost to the City.
i
I
i
E
I,
RESOLUTION NO. 78-94
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO
DESIGNATING A STOP INTERSECTION ON LA CANADA AVENUE
AT DEL RIO AVENUE
WHEREAS, Section 4-2 .801 et seq. of the Atascadero Municipal
Code allows the City Traffic Engineer to determine the location of
STOP intersections, and to place and maintain appropriate signs or
markings indicating the same; and
WHEREAS, the Atascadero Traffic committee has recommended that
establishing a STOP intersection on La Canada Avenue at Del Rio
Avenue will improve the traffic safety of that intersection.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Atascadero
directs the City Traffic Engineer to place and maintain appropriate
signs or markings indicating STOP intersections at the locations
listed above and further described on attached Exhibit A.
On motion by Councilmember , and seconded by
Councilmember 1 the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted in
its entirety on the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ADOPTED:
ATTEST:
LEE PRICE, City Clerk R. DAVID BEWLEY, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ARTHER R. MONTANDON
City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
HENRY ENGEN
Director of Community Development
Exhibit A
Resolution No. 78-94
A
O
a
o
A
�I
CANADA
LA PROPOSE
STOP SIGN
i
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Iiem: A-4
Through: Andrew J. Takata Meeting ate: 08/09/94
City Manager
File Number: TPM 11-90
From: Henry Engen V&
Community Development Director
i
SUBJECT•
Acceptance of Final Parcel Map 11-90 to subdivide one lot into four
(4) airspace condominiums and a common area. The project is
located at 8065 Amapoa. (Noel Shutt)
RECOMMENDATION•
Acceptance of Final Parcel Map #11-90 .
I
a
BACKGROUND: I
I
On October 9 , 1990, the City Council conducted a public hearing on
the above-referenced map. Council concurred with the Planning
Commission' s recommendation to approve TPM #11-90 3ubject, to the
Findings and the Revised Conditions of Approval . h1l conditions
have been completed by the applicant. !
HE:ph
Attachment: Location Map
cc: Noel Shutt
i
a
I
r
I
44 • t • • ,
f IS
..s �`i �� � ♦ pis\!�I► ;t, •13,, �.
Min
kvWp-
, � ..
j fir' �'';�j.�""
O ♦ � . _ .: IWd
��► ' :;;+ilk-w .'• �` +u, �♦.
• mss!
I
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item: A-5
i
Through: Andrew J. Takata Meeting ate: 08/09/94
City Manager
File Number: TPM 12-90
From: Henry Engen 4)tC
Community Development Director
SUBJECT:
Acceptance of Final Parcel Map 12-90 to convert an existing four-
unit project into airspace condominiums . The project is located at
8045 Amapoa Avenue. (Noel Shutt)
i
RECOMMENDATION•
Acceptance of Final Parcel Map #12-90 .
BACKGROUND:
On October 9 , 1990, the City Council conducted a pu lic hearing on
the above-referenced map. Council concurred with the Planning
Commission ' s recommendation to approve TPM #12-90 1subject to the
Findings and the Conditions of Approval . All condiiions have been
completed by the applicant. I
HE:ph
Attachment : Location Map
I
cc: Noel Shutt
I
1
I
0
3
I
� III
i��t ICJ/1`,t
w
e •.
Mm011,
�'�� :: ��'��i�i�Y�a �'��� ������ , •�. �I�i
wk
� �, .�♦ � ♦
MAP
�r►'��s, �!�►�1�i� a •�� � . ��
Ij �� :.-A ,►jam
i
I
i
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL Meeting Date: 8/09/94
CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item : A-6
I
Through: Andy Takata, City Manager
From: Lee Price, City Clerk l
�J
SUBJECT:
Set dates for interviewing applicants for the Planning Cgmmission and the
Traffic Committee.
RECOMMENDATION:
1 . Schedule the Planning Commission interviews for Tu 3sday, August 30,
1994; beginning at 4:30 p.m. (Club Room)
2. Schedule the Traffic Committee interviews for TuesdOy, September 13,
1994 at 6:00 p.m. (Prior to commencement of the r4gular meeting)
DISCUSSION:
I
Terms on the Planning Commission will expire September 1, 1994. The
Commission's first meeting for the month of September is on the 6th, and although
the time frame is short, staff believes that there would be adequate. time to orientate
the new commission members.
The terms of the Traffic Committee members-at-large hav already expired.
Marj Mackey and Cindy Campbell have agreed to serve until they are replaced. There
are five applicants to consider. Rather than set another special meeting date, staff is
suggesting that the candidates be interviewed at the 6:00 hour just prior to the
regular meeting on September 13th. The Traffic Committee meets on the third
Wednesday of the month and it is anticipated that the new committee members can
get on board in time for that meeting.
1
i
i
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL Agenda Ite A-7
CITY OF ATASCADERO
Through: Andy Takata, City Meeting Manager e: 8 9
g g Da� 94/ /
From: Brad Whitty, Finance Direct
3
SUBJECT: Adopting New Stipend for the Elected City Clerk.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adoption of Resolution No. 82-
94 increasing the City Clerk' s salary from $100.00 to $200.00 per
month.
BACKGROUND:
Periodically the City Clerk' s stipend has beerI adjusted by
City Council pursuant to Atascadero Municipal Code„ Section 2-
6.04. Historically, these adjustments have occurrejd as follows:
Resolution No. 5-82 $20. 00/Monthly February 9, 1982
Resolution No. 103-86 $50. 00/Monthly September 8, 1986
Resolution No. 75-89 $100. 00/Monthly October 10, 1989
FISCAL IMPACT
3
The proposed adjustment is projected to cost an additional
$1,230 during the current fiscal year.
1
s
i
i
I
r
i
i'
f
I
id
t
RESOLUTION NO. 82-94
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ATASCADERO APPROVING AN
INCREASE IN THE CITY CLERK'S STIPEND
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Atascadero
that effective July 1, 1994, the monthly salary of the City Clerk
shall increase from $100. 00 to $200. 00.
On motion by Councilperson seconded by
Councilperson , the foregoing resolution is hereby
adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ADOPTED:
CITY OF ATASCADERO
By:
R. DAVID BEWLEY, MAYOR
ATTEST:
LEE PRICE, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ARTHER MONTANDON
City Attorney
I
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item: A-7
CITY OF ATASCADERO
Through: Andy Takata, City Manager Meeting Date: 8-/9/94
/94
From: Brad Whitty, Finance Direct
SUBJECT: Adopting New Stipend for the Elected City Clerk.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adoption of Resolution No. 82-
94 increasing the City Clerk' s salary from $100.00 to $200.00 per
month.
BACKGROUND:
Periodically the City Clerk's stipend has bee adjusted by
City Council pursuant to Atascadero Municipal Code„ Section 2-
6. 04. Historically, these adjustments have occurred as follows:
i
Resolution No. 5-82 $20. 00/Monthly Februlry 9, 1982
Resolution No. 103-86 $50. 00/Monthly Septenber 8, 1986
Resolution No. 75-89 $100.00/Monthly October 10, 1989
FISCAL IMPACT
The proposed adjustment is projected to cost an additional
$1,230 during the current fiscal year.
i
I
i
f
i
i
I
RESOLUTION NO. 82-94
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ATASCADERO APPROVING AN
INCREASE IN THE CITY CLERK'S STIPEND
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Atascadero
that effective July 1, 1994, the monthly salary of the City Clerk
shall increase from $100. 00 to $200. 00.
On motion by Councilperson seconded by
Councilperson , the foregoing resolution is hereby
adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ADOPTED:
CITY OF ATASCADERO
By:
R. DAVID BEWLEY, MAYOR
ATTEST:
LEE PRICE, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ARTHER MONTANDON
City Attorney
I
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL Meting Date: 8/9/94
CITY OF ATASCADERO genda Item: B-1(A)
Through: Andy Takata, City Manager
Via: Henry Engen, Community Development Director
From: Kelly Heffernon, Administrative Analyst I
I
SUBJECT: Second Public Hearing on the Source Reduction and Recycling Element
(SRRE) with Appendices (Volumes 1 & 2 of the Cotintywide Integrated
Waste Management Plan)
i
f
1
RECOMMENDATION: That Council review the program plans outlined in the
Source Reduction and Recycling Element and continue the
Public Hearing to the 8/23/94 Council meeting for final
adoption
BACKGROUND:
Council first reviewed the SRRE on 12/8/92 which was conducteas an introductory
workshop. The second review of the document, and first of Iwo required Public
Hearings, was held on 3/9/93 in which Council gave tentative a�proval.
The second Public Hearing is intended for when the City is prepay d to formally adopt
the SRRE, which can only occur after the EIR for both the SIRE and Household
Hazardous Waste Element (HHWE) has been certified by the Lead gency and adopted
by participating jurisdictions. SLOCOG, as Lead Agency in this p ocess, certified the
Program EIR on April 6, 1994.
A copy of the SRRE document has been placed on Council's reading desk for review.
Please see Attachment A, Memorandum to Councilmembers dated 10/22/92, for
further background information.
DISCUSSION:
According to CEQA, all cities and the County are considered "Responsible Agencies"
and must certify that the Lead Agency reviewed and considered the information
contained in the EIR. Because of legal issues concerning the EIR and timing of the
upcoming joint meeting between Paso Robles and Atascadero, the City Attorney has
requested that the final Public Hearing on the SRRE, HHWE and Program EIR be
3
S
i
tl
continued to the 8/23/94 Council meeting. City and SLOCOG staff will be available
at both meetings to answer questions.
Since Council's last review of the document, two modifications have been made to
the SRRE. First, the tables have been updated to reflect more realistic program
implementation dates. Second, the City's share of regional costs have been
calculated based on Atascadero's estimated percent of countywide tonnage disposed
rather than on population. A comparison between these two methods shows an
approximate 20% increase in regional costs, although local costs remain unchanged
(please refer to the Funding Component for details).
Council should note that Atascadero has already implemented several of the proposed
programs outlined in the document. To date, the City has implemented a Residential
Curbside Recycling Program of commingled recyclables and yard debris and a
Commercial Recycling Program of commingled recyclables, cardboard, office paper
and phone books. The Recycling Committee has also been active with various
aspects of public education/information and backyard composting. In addition, Wil-
Mar Disposal recently initiated a pilot program to sort recyclables at their yard which,
if successful, will significantly save in hauling and sorting costs.
Council should further note that approval of the SRRE does not commit the City to
implement every program and construct every facility indicated in the document, nor
to signing the Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) to form a Countywide Integrated Solid
Waste Management Authority. The City has the option to participate in a North
County JPA, or to handle the AB 939 process on its own.
SLOCOG will submit copies of adopted SRRE documents to the California Integrated
Waste Management Board (CIWMB) by the August 31st deadline.
FISCAL IMPACT:
As proposed, all program and facility costs will be funded through tipping fees. Note
that these estimated costs are based on the City's participation in a Countywide Solid
Waste Management Authority. Depending on the specific program and Atascadero's
direction in regional solid waste management, the City's share in these costs will likely
vary. Please see Attachment B for a summary of estimated costs as described in the
updated SRRE document.
Encl: Resolution No. 80 - 94
Attachment A: Memorandum to City Council dated 10/22/92
Attachment B: Cost Summary of programs and Facilities Proposed
in the SRRE
RESOLUTION NO. 80 - 94
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO ADOPTING
THE SOURCE REDUCTION AND RECYCLING ELEMENT
WHEREAS, the Atascadero City Council is committed to providing City
residents and businesses with methods for reducing, reusing, recycling and
composting discarded materials; and
WHEREAS, the Atascadero City Council is dedicated to providing pro9 rams that
are safe, efficient, cost effective and environmentally sound; and
WHEREAS, the Atascadero City Council recognizes that proper collection and
processing of community generated resources provides opportunities for long term
local economic benefit; and
WHEREAS, it is a priority for the Atascadero City Council to develop programs
and facilities that strengthen local economic opportunities for City residents; and
WHEREAS, the Atascadero City Council intends to work with neighboring
communities to provide cost effective and productive regional programs and facilities;
and
WHEREAS, the California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 mandates
adoption and implementation of a Source Reduction and Recycling Element and the
reduction of landfilled waste by 25% by 1995 and 50% by 2000.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Atascadero does hereby adopt the June 1994 Source Reduction and Recycling
Element as produced by the Solid Waste Task Force and approved by the San Luis
Obispo council of Governments, attached hereto as Exhibit "A", and incorporated
herein.
Resolution No. 80-94
Page 2
On motion by Councilmember seconded by Councilmember
the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the
following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
DATE ADOPTED:
ATTEST: CITY OF ATASCADERO
By:
LEE PRICE, City Clerk R. DAVID BEWLEY, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ARTHER R. MONTANDON, City Attorney
ATTACHMENT A
MEMORANDUM
To: City Councilmembers
Ray Windsor, City Manager
Via: Greg Luke, Public Works Director
From: Kelly Heffernon, Administrative Analyst
Subject: Update of AB 939 Process
Date: October 22, 1992
The objective of this update is to review the status of the Source Reduction and
Recycling Element (SRRE) and the potential major impacts that the local and regional
programs may have on the City. This review is prepared as a prelude to the upcoming
workshop and Public Hearing process for adoption of the SRRE by Council.
SRRE WORKSHOP
The 9
City's contract agreement with the consultant (BVA) includes two public review
workshops. It is anticipated that the first workshop will be an introduction to the
SRRE. Council will be encouraged at this time to address issues that will require
further evaluation at the subsequent workshop. Since detailed technical questions will
likely be premature at this first meeting, it is recommended that County staff make the
introductory presentation. This would save the City a costly visit from the consultant
for a future workshop when their services would be better warranted.
To date, two cities have had their first workshop: Arroyo Grande's(September 22) and
Paso Robles (October 6). Both were scheduled during regular City Council meetings,
allowing little time to adequately review the document. Staff recommends a separate
public hearing be held to evaluate the SRRE.
Given the scope and projected costs for the various programs outlined in the
document, the adoption process is anticipated to be controversial and time
consuming. Although it may be prudent to wait and see how other jurisdictions
respond to their SRRE's, it should be kept in mind that the 1995 deadline is not far
away.
There will be an abundance of information presented at the workshops. The following
is provided as an introduction to what will be discussed at these meetings.
BACKGROUND
As you may recall, the California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 (AB
939) mandates each jurisdiction to develop the following plans:
* Solid Waste Generation Study (SWGS)
* Source Reduction and Recycling Element (SRRE)
* Household Hazardous Waste Element (HHWE)
Counties are additionally responsible for preparing a Countywide Siting Element (CSE)
and a County Integrated Waste Management Plan (CIWMP).
Recent state legislation (AB 3001 ) added to the responsibility of both cities and
counties to include a Nonsdisposal Facility Element (NDFE). This element is to include
all solid waste facilities and solid waste facility expansions, except disposal and
transformation facilities, which will recover for reuse or recycling at least 5% of the
total volume of material received by the facility. The NDFE is to be appended to the
jurisdiction's SRRE when it is included with the CIWMP.
Development and implementation of these plans is the responsibility of each individual
jurisdiction under AB 939. The cities and the unincorporated county areas have
formed a regional Solid Waste Task Force (SWTF) under the San Luis Obispo Council
of Governments (SLOCOG). The original intent of establishing a regional planning
approach was to maximize efficiencies of facility and program planning, development
and operation.
The draft SWGS and SRRE for the City have been completed by a solid waste
consultant, reviewed by the California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB)
and returned with minor comments. The HHWE is currently being prepared by
SLOCOG staff the Solid Waste Technical Advisory Committee. It is anticipated that
a draft of this document will be brought before the SWTF for review and comment
shortly after the first of the year. Environmental analysis for both the SRRE and
HHWE will be included in one Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR).
The Source Reduction and Recycling Element has the following eight components:
1 . Source Reduction
2. Recycling
3. Composting
4. Special Wastes
5. Education and Public Information
6. Disposal Facility Capacity
7. Funding
8. Integration
0
000019
OVERVIEW OF PROGRAMS
As an organizational format, each component is divided into 5 ro major ram areas:
1 program
Objectives, Existing Conditions, Evaluation and Selection of Program Alternatives,
Program Implementation and Monitoring and Evaluation. The SWTF has determined
that regional implementation of some programs and facilities will be cost effective and
eliminate the duplication of efforts of individual jurisdictions within the county.
The SWTF is in the process of developing a Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) which will
create a regional Authority. As you may recall, the concept of the JPA was endorsed
by the Council last February. The tasks of the Authority have been outlined to:
* Coordinate development and implementation of regional pirograms
* Manage public interest in the development and operations of major composting
and materials processing facilities
The City is to work with the regional Authority to develop reglional programs and
facilities that will effectively integrate with the City's existing programs. City staff
will also manage the local implementation of regionally developed programs. For
example, the City may work with the regional Authority to develop printed source
reduction materials and then coordinate the use of the materialsin the City.
Although future legislation may allow regions to calculate diversion levels on a regional
• basis, the ultimate vulnerability to the $10,000 a day fine for noncompliance is with
the individual jurisdiction. This is an extremely important point. Council could be
faced with a decision to give JPA extensive authority to implement the Integrated
Waste Management Plan yet the City will still ultimately Abe responsible for
implementing all of the AB 939 provisions.
Regional Programs and Facilities will include:
* Source Reduction
* Recycling facility for materials processing
* Composting facility
* Special waste collection and processing site
* Education and public information
To meet the 1995 requirements, the City will focus on continued expansion of
existing programs to reach the state mandated goal of 25% waste reduction. The
City's existing successful collection programs include the following:
* Volume-based rate structure
* Residential curbside of green waste
* Residential curbside of commingled recyclables
* Pilot collection of recyclables and cardboard from commercial businesses and
multi-unit complexes
Existing local programs are funded by the garbage collection rates charged to
residents and businesses. Planned regional programs will be funded by increases in
tipping fees at the landfill and at recycling and composting facilities. The tipping fee
is the cost per ton the hauler must pay to the landfill to dump waste and is ultimately
reflected in the rates paid by residents and businesses.
REVIEW OF AB 939 PROGRAMS DESCRIBED IN THE SRRE
Source Reduction
Source reduction means decreasing waste by consuming less. It is mandated by the
state as the highest priority program. Source reduction programs will be most
efficiently and economically developed on a regional basis. Our SRRE indicates that
City staff will participate in the development of programs and that implementation will
be both regional and local. Planned programs include providing technical assistance,
education and promotion of:
* Backyard "master composting" program
* Business and local government waste evaluations\source reduction
* Countywide waste exchange
* Countywide joint purchase pools
* Environmental shopping campaign
* Public source reduction education program
* Regional bans on specific products and packaging
* Review of planning, zoning and building codes for potential development of
incentives to encourage rehabilitation of existing structures
* Monitoring of state and federal grant programs
Recycling
As stated above, planned regional recycling programs and facilities will be based on
the City's existing recycling programs. The policies in which City recycling programs
are based include:
* Maintain source reduction as a primary objective
* Continue source separation programs which provide an uncontaminated, more
valuable product
* Encourage the purchase of recycled products
* Encourage the establishment of businesses which manufacture goods made
from recyclables
Our recycling component consists of plans to continually expand our existing
collection programs which are listed above, and to evaluate the feasibility of
participating in a regional materials processing facility. This facility would serve the
area north of the Cuesta Grade and would process source separated recyclables and
is
debris from the residential, commercial, industrial and institutional sectors. Only the
residue would be landfilled. The costs estimated by the consultant for this facility are
high end projections and are shown in the attached summary of costs. The projected
date of completion for this facility is 1996.
Composting
The City's composting program will expand upon our existing residential green waste
collection program. Collected yard debris will eventually be composted at a regionally
sited composting facility. Reaching our 25% diversion level will largely depend upon
when this facility and collection system are implemented.
Once this program is established, the City will work with other jurisdictions to
determine the feasibility of expanding the compost program to include food debris,
agricultural materials, unrecycled paper and municipal sewage sludge. The estimated
costs of this facility and program are shown in the attached summary of costs.
Special Wastes
Special wastes are those that require special handling due to their physical
characteristics or potential hazard to human health or to the environment. The special
waste programs targeted in the SRRE include the following:
* Expansion of white goods (large appliances) collection at the landfill
* Construction and demolition debris (asphalt, concrete and sheetrock) collection
and processing
* Expansion of existing tire diversion programs
Education
Education and public information programs are planned to be developed on a regional
level. City staff will work with the regional Authority to develop appropriate education
and public information materials for source reduction, recycling, composting, and
special waste programs. Materials developed and produced on the regional level will
be available for Atascadero's use in promoting both regional and;. local programs.
SUMMARY OF SRRE PROGRAM COSTS
FOR ATASCADERO
The costs outlined below are estimates based on various program assumptions. The
actual costs may vary depending on final program design. Costs for regional programs
i
o
are distributed among the North County jurisdictions according to population.ulation. Please
0
refer to
r
Volume 2 of the SRRE document for a finer breakdown akdown of costs.
The projected regional costs for these programs include local staff time. The City is
currently supplying a limited amount of staff time for recycling programs and
education. As proposed, demand for staff time will increase with the planning and
implementation of programs.
Note that some of the programs have already been enacted and costs incorporated
into the existing rate structure for garbage collection. Various pilot programs, such
as commercial recycling, are also currently in place.
1. SOURCE REDUCTION
Anticipated Capital Costs Operating Costs
Date of (the City's & Debt Service
Implementation proportionate share) (Cost per year)
All Programs: 1992-1995 $4,999 $15,318
*Local Government Programs
*Technical Assistance,
Education, and Promotion
*Regulatory Programs
*Economic Incentives
*Rate Structure
Modification
II. RECYCLING
A. Single-Family December 1991 $285,458 $182,202
Curbside (all costs of curbside are included in existing rates)
Assumes Santa Margarita and Templeton
will be incorporated into the Atascadero
program and share the costs.
B. Multi-Unit 1992 $30,336 $4,930
Recycling
There is currently a
pilot program in place
serving a limited # of
complexes.
Anticipated Capital Costs Operating Costs
Date of (the City's & Debt Service
Implementation proportionate share) (Cost per year)
C. Commercial 1992 $116,470 $52,549
Recycling
There is currently
a pilot program in place.
* Processing n\a $200,972 Assumes
Facility processing costs
This facility will be used to service will be offset by
curbside, multi-unit recycling and bar & revenues
restaurant glass recycling.
D. Office Paper 1992 $3,681 $3,557
Recycling
E. Material 1996 $865,832 $196,900
Processing
Facility
Used to process source separated
recyclables and debris from residential,
commercial and industrial waste streams.
Will require interagency coordination.
Total Recycling: $1,502,749 $440,138
(Less curbside): ($1,217,291) ($257,936)
III. COMPOSTING
A. Yard Debris 1993 $1,078,830 $238,414
(collection and
facility costs)
Collection and processing
of yard debris, wood debris,
manure and misc. organics.
C. Source-Separated 1995 $1,328,279 $527,115
Organics
Composting
This is an expansion of the
collection system of the yard
debris composting program.
Food debris, mixed paper and
contaminated paper are added
to the program.
. Total Composting: $2,407,109 $765,529
I
Anticipated Capital Costs Operating Costs
Date of (the City's & Debt Service
Implementation proportionate share) (Cost per year)
IV. SPECIAL WASTES
All Programs: 1992-1994 n\a $8,834
*White goods recycling,
repair and reuse
*Asphalt, concrete, and
sheetrock recycling
*Tire management program
(retreading, reuse,
crumb rubber, shredding
tire-derived fuel)
V. EDUCATION AND PUBLIC INFORMATION
All Programs: 1992-1993 $20,208 $17,080
*Includes public education
activities associated
with each component.
��01i4p ."�
ATTACHMENT B
COST SUMMARY OF PROGRAMS AND FACILITIES PROPOSED IN THE
SOURCE REDUCTION AND RECYCLING ELEMENT
Source Reduction:
Total Regional Capital Costs = $47,200
Atascadero's Share of regional costs
=
$6, 145
Recycling - Material Processing Facility in North County:
Total Regional Capital Costs = $2,364,000
Atascadero's Share of Regional Costs
= $ 1,029,286
Composting - Yard Debris Facility in North County:
Total Regional Capital Costs = $51,600
Atascadero's Share of Regional Costs
= $22,467
Composting - Source Separated Organics Facility in North County:
Regional Total = $2,195,600
Atascadero's Share of Regional Costs
= $955,964
Education and Public Information:
Total Regional Capital Costs = $190,800
Atascadero's Share of Regional costs
= $24,842
Note: Atascadero's share of regional costs are calculated based on an estimate of the City's
percent of countywide tonnage disposed and would be paid out of tipping fees.
I
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL Meeting Date: 8/09/94
CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda item: B-1(B)
Through: Andy Takata, City Manager
Via: Henry Engen, Community Development Director
From: Kelly Heffernon, Administrative Analyst
I
i
SUBJECT: Second Public Hearing on the Household Hazardous Waste
Element (Volume 4 of the Countywide Integrated Waste
Management Plan)
RECOMMENDATION: That Council review the program plans outlined in the
Household Hazardous Waste Elementl and continue the
Public Hearing to the 8/23/94 Council meeting for final
adoption
i
BACKGROUND:
I
On February 22, 1994 Council held the first of two required Pu lic Hearings on the
Household Hazardous Waste Element (HHWE) in which tentative pproval was given.
Before Council can adopt either the HHWE or the Source Redu tion and Recycling
Element (SRRE) CEQA requirements must be satisfied. A Pro�ram EIR has been
prepared to evaluate the environmental impacts of implementing he SRRE's and the
HHWE. SLOCOG is the Lead Agency for this project with participating jurisdictions
serving as "Responsible Agencies" as defined under CEQA. SLOC G certified the EIR
on April 6, 1994.
As a Responsible Agency, the City is required to endorse the prow sions of the EIR for
programs or projects planned for implementation within the City limits. Due to legal
issues concerning the EIR and timing of the upcoming joint meetinc between the cities
of Paso Robles and Atascadero, the City Attorney has requested hat the final Public
Hearing on the SRRE, HHWE and Program EIR be continued to t e 8/23/94 Council
meeting. All final documents must be submitted to the Californip Integrated Waste
Management Board (CIWMB) no later than August 31 , 1994. j
I
A Copy of the HHWE has been placed on Council's reading desk'for review.
DISCUSSION:
The state mandates each City and County to adopt a Household Hazardous Waste
Element along with their respective Source Reduction and Recycling Element. The
purpose of the HHWE is to outline programs to safely reduce, collect, recycle and
dispose of household hazardous waste. SLOCOG staff, with assistance from the Solid
Waste Technical Advisory Committee (SWTAC) and Solid Waste Task Force (SWTF),
prepared the HHWE for the seven cities and County. The approach was to establish
countywide programs for consistency and cost effectiveness.
The CIW
MB reviewed the document and submitted their comments in August 1993.
All comments, including those from the state, SWTAC, SWTF and County Board of
Supervisors, have been incorporated into the document before you. Since Council's
last review of the HHWE, the only changes made include added language concerning
shared liability indemnification of permanent collection facilities and minor
modifications to Section 6, "Selection and Implementation of Programs".
The program alternatives considered in the document fall into four main categories:
1. Collection Programs such as curbside collection programs and one-day events
using mobile and/or permanent facilities.
2. Load Checking Programs on a periodic basis at the landfills.
3. Recycling and Reuse Programs encouraging private sector participation.
4. Education and Public Information Programs to increase awareness throughout
the County.
The proposed programs are designed to be implemented on a regional basis under the
Countywide Integrated Waste Management Authority in an effort to avoid duplication
of programs and facilities. It is currently undetermined which direction Atascadero or
the North County will take in managing solid and household hazardous waste.
However, the document does provide a munu of program choices.
Council should note that from a local standpoint, the City has been successful in
recycling various categories of household hazardous waste through its Special
Recycling Events.
City and SLOCOG staff will be available at both Council meetings to answer
questions.
RESOLUTION NO. 81 - 94
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO
ADOPTING THE HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE ELEMENT
WHEREAS, the Atascadero City Council is committed to providing city residents
with methods for reducing the volumes of household hazardous wastes, and for the
safe collection, recycling and disposal of household hazardous wastes; and
WHEREAS, the Atascadero City Council is further committed to providing the
public with education and information about alternatives to hazardous products and
about reusing, recycling and safe disposal of household hazardous wastes; and
WHEREAS, Y
the Atascadero Cit Council intends to work with otherjurisdictions
to provide cost effective and productive regional programs for the safe collection,
recycling and disposal of household hazardous wastes; and
Y 9
WHEREAS, the Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 mandates adoption
and implementation of a Household Hazardous Waste Element.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Atascadero does hereby
adopt the June 1994 Household Hazardous Waste Element as produced by the Solid
Waste Task Force and approved by the San Luis Obispo council of Governments,
attached hereto as Exhibit "A", and incorporated herein.
On motion by Councilmember seconded by Councilmember
the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the
following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
DATE ADOPTED:
Resolution No. 81-94
Page 2
ATTEST: CITY OF ATASCADERO
By:
LEE PRICE, City Clerk R. DAVID BE'WLEY, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ARTHER R. MONTANDON, City Attorney
€3()00,31.,
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL Meeting Date: 8/09/94
CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item: B-1(C)
Through: Andy Takata, City Manager
Via: Henry Engen, Community Development Director 1 E
From: Kelly Heffernon, Administrative Analyst
SUBJECT: Public hearing for adoption of a Nondisposal Facil ty Element for the
Cities and County of San Luis Obispo
3
j$
i
RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve Resolution No. 7P - 94 adopting the
Nondisposal Facility Element
BACKGROUND:
In 1992, the California legislature enacted AB 3001 amending the California Integrated
Waste Management Act (AB 939) to require all cities and counties to prepare and
adopt a Nondisposal Facility Element (NDFE). The purpose of the NDFE is to 1)
identify all new - and expansions of existing riondisposal facilities and 2) provide a
planning link between individual facilities and each jurisdiction's S urce Reduction and
Recycling Element (SRRE). A copy of the document has been placed on Council's
reading desk.
The bill defines a nondisposal facility as any solid waste facility required to obtain a
solid waste facility permit, except a disposal facility or a transformation facility. A
nondisposal facility must also recover for reuse or recycling at least 5% of the total
volume of material received by the facility. There are currently no nondisposal
facilities within San Luis Obispo County. I
i
DISCUSSION:
i
SLOCOG staff prepared the attached NDFE which each jurisdictioll within the County
must consider for adoption. SLOCOG staff will submit the document to the California
Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB), along with the Source Reduction and
Recycling Element (SRRE) and Household Hazardous Waste Element (HHWE), by the
August 31 , 1994 deadline for review and final approval.
The NDFE requires only one public hearing, and is not subject to environmental review
under CEQA (although construction of an actual project would certainly be subject to
CEQA).
�l(9i?r?.a•?
Chapter 1 of the NDFE identifies facilities that do not require a solid waste permit,
while Chapter 2 identifies nondisposal facilities that may be developed to achieve the
mandated diversion goals. There are no specific plans for nondisposal facilities at this
time, so any identification of a potential facility is very general in nature. The NDFE
will be incorporated into each jurisdiction's Source Reduction and Recycling Element
at the five year revision. Amendments to the NDFE are required only when a
jurisdiction is planning to construct a nondisposal facility to help meet AS 939 goals.
Once the NDFE is submitted to the state, the CIWMB must make its approval
determination within 180 days.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There are no fiscal impacts associated with adopting the NDFE.
Encl: Resolution No. 79-94.
RESOLUTION NO. 79 - 94
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO
ADOPTING THE NONDISPOSAL FACILITY ELEMENT
WHEREAS, the State of California mandates all cities and counties to prepare
a Nondisposal Facility Element; and
WHEREAS, the City of Atascadero is committed to developing plans, programs
and documents in compliance with State law.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Atascadero does hereby adopt the June 1994 Nondisposal Facility Element as
produced by the Solid Waste Task Force and approved by the San Luis Obispo Council
of Governments, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein.
On motion by Councilmember , seconded by Councilmember
the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the
following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
DATE ADOPTED:
ATTEST: CITY OF ATASCADERO
By:
LEE PRICE, City Clerk R. DAVID BEWLEY, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ARTHER R. MONTANDON, City Attorney
i
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL j
CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda- tem: G-1
Through: Andrew J. Takata Meeting ate: 08/09/94
City Manager
From: Henry Engen „
Community Development Director
i
SUBJECT:
General Plan Study Session - To review the Urban! Services Line
Policies and possibly initiate consideration of amendments to the
Land Use Element.
RECOMMENDATION:
Following discussion, give direction to staff relative to possibly
initiating Land Use Element amendments .
i
i
BACKGROUND:
At City Council ' s meeting of July 26, 1994, Counc lmember Carden
requested setting agenda time for a working sessiot to review the
City' s Urban Services Line General Plan policies . The formal
application deadline for amendments to the City' s General Plan is
October 1st and April 1st but the City Council may iitiate General
Plan Amendments for consideration at any time. Before any
amendments may be brought to hearing, a staff report is required,
including an environmental analysis and developme t of recommen-
dations leading to hearings before the Planning Commission and
ultimately action by the City Council . i
DISCUSSION•
i
The Land Use Element and Conservation and Open Spac Elements were
adopted in January 1992 following six ( 6) years of pork, including
preparation and certification of an Environmental �mpact Report.
The accompanying attachments highlight the existing General Plan
language relative to the Urban Services Line and the relationship
of that line to Suburban Single-Family Residential areas, wherein
sewer service is not to be provided, and higher dens ty residential
areas where it is desired. In addition, the pla ' s section on
sewage disposal is included which reflects the Driorities for
provision of sewer service, indicating a lesser priority for
General Plan Amendments proposing the extension of s wer service to
areas which are currently beyond the Urban Servic s Line. Also
I
0
_ I
pertinent to this study session is the plan ' s language under
"Specific Plan on Page II-38 , which designates the southerly
portion of the City between the Salinas River and Highway 101 north
of Santa Barbara as being a candidate for higher density and,
hence, inclusion within the Urban Services Line. The Land Use
Element specifically indicates that: "Where major expansions are
proposed an Environmental Impact Report shall be required" .
The accompanying General Plan maps reflect the existing Urban
Services Line, including the recent modifications approved by the
City Council at the corner of Del Rio and El Camino Real and at
Viejo Camino and El Camino Real .
Finally, that section of the General Plan EIR that addressed the
matter of possibly extending the Urban Services Line to include the
remainder of the northeast and southeast quadrants is included in
the attachments . The EIR consultants somewhat simplified the
potential impacts of including these areas by estimating that this
would likely establish a density of one acre lots which could lead
to some 650 additional dwelling units . Owing to the mobilehome
projects in the northeast quadrant that would probably be allowed
to reacquire RMF zoning, it is predictable that expanding the Urban
Services Line would generate requests for consideration of the full
array of urban uses allowed within the USL. The EIR noted also
that: "Significant capital outlays would be necessary to provide
sewerage to these areas . The new developments to be served would
likely be charged for this infrastructure through hook-up fees or
assessment districts, so impacts on the community at large may not
be significant" .
FISCAL IMPACT•
Depending on the extent of changes that might be directed for
consideration, planning studies could be undertaken by existing
staff by rearranging work program priorities . However, the
requisite engineering analysis of sewer system impacts may or may
not have a fiscal impact. Finally, should an EIR be required
before such a project could go forth, that cost would have to be
borne by the City.
HE:ph
Enclosures : General Plan Excerpts
Land Use Plan Maps
Final EIR (General Plan) Excerpts
Ig�111E1;1�a
GENERAL PLAN',.EXCERPTS
From the Land Use Element
pertaining to the Urban
Services Line land use
policies
rolling hills, but nearly level areas include the Salinas River flood plain
and terrace, narrow lowlands adjacent to Atascadero Creek and
Graves Creek, and the valley bisected by Highway 101. Between the
freeway and the Salinas River are isolated hills, the most predominant
of which is Pine Mountain whose 1,332 foot elevation provides a
conspicuous backdrop to the central business district.
The Salinas River, often referred to as the "underground river," defines
the eastern boundary of Atascadero, excepting county park lands and
the Atascadero State Hospital. The State Division of Mines and
Geology has classified a considerable portion of the Salinas River
channel as containing significant mineral deposits, namely sand and
gravel resources (refer to Technical Appendix - Mineral Resources
Management).
The defined planning area contains significant divisions, each of which
has a special application in the Land Use Plan. The function of these
specific divisions may be described as follows:
a. Urban Reserve Line
The Urban Reserve Line indicates the ultimate boundary for
urban and suburban uses. It relates closely to the provision of
future public services and facilities and is dictated largely by
topographic considerations, existing land use patterns and
communitY Reserve Lineenerall
attitudes. The Urban Y
9
coincides with the Atascadero Colony boundary, except for two
Agricultural Preserves and a portion of a third (the Eagle Ranch
Agriculture Preserve has a total of 5,978 acres, of which 2,786
acres are within the Colony boundaries) that are located on the
periphery of the Colony and excluding areas south of Santa
Barbara Road and west of the summit of Frog Pond Mountain.
Continued agricultural use of these properties is encouraged. If
the properties are removed from preserve status and desire
urban or suburban uses, it will be necessary to expand the
Urban Reserve Line by amending the General Plan. The Urban
Reserve Area is further divided into two sub-areas the Urban
Services Area and the Suburban Services Area.
b. Urban Services Area
The Urban Services Line defines the area that will eventually be
furnished with major public and quasi-public services. This area
will be served by some or all of the essential urban services,
including
Ambulance Solid Waste Disposal
Cultural Facilities Storm Drainage
Fire Protection Streets
Improvement Districts Street Sweeping
Library Street Trees
Parks Utilities
Police Water
Sewers
Master storm drainage plans for selected sub-drainage basins
within the urban service areas shall be prepared and
implemented.
C. Suburban Services Area
The Suburban Services Area consists of the remainder of the
city and that portion of the Eaglet Tract within the city
boundaries. Services to be provided are:
Ambulance Police
Creekway & Horse Trails Streets
Fire Protection Solid Waste Disposal
Improvement Districts Utilities
Parks Water
Importantly, sewer service will not be provided in this area
except for "cease and desist" septic problem areas and where
approved by the City Council for eublic uses.
Policies contained in the various elements of the city's General Plan are
intended to respect both the physical setting of the city and the historic
plan which guided its development. The plan provides for a
II-7
distinguishable urban core area surrounded by a low density suburban
residential environment. Beyond the city's urban reserve line - which
might more accurately be identified as suburban reserve line - the
city's plan encourages rural residential, agricultural and other open
space types of uses to both reinforce the city's identity and to maintain
the open space characteristics historic to San Luis Obispo County. It
is not in the city's nor the county's interest to allow land uses which
would lead to the strip urbanization of either the Highway 101 corridor
or Highway 41. In fact, neither one of these corridors can readily be
widened throughout the county; 101 because of the Cuesta Grade and
Highway 41 because of the extremely rough terrain lying between
Morro Bay and the city of Atascadero. Maintaining the distinctive
character of Atascadero will require coordinated planning with the
county of San Luis Obispo. Toward this end, a county planning
referral area encompassing that area lying between Vineyard Drive and
the top of Cuesta Grade and between the summit of the hills east of
the Salinas River and the Cerro Alto Campground west of the city has
been established. The county will consult the city before considering
any land use intensification within the unincorporated portion of this
planning referral area.
2. RESIDENTIAL
The accompanying land use plan map broadly distinguishes between two
types of residential areas: (1) areas within the Urban Service Line which are
characterized by sewer service and urban densities, and (2) areas beyond
the Urban Service Line which are characterized as suburban single-family
large lot areas (including agricultural enclaves) which are on private sewer
system s. Large lots are a distinguishing characteristic of Atascadero and the
density standards of the plan and regulatory zoning regulations shall preserve
this feature thus insuring "elbow room" for present and future inhabitants.
Such regulations shall also insure the keeping of domestic animals for
pleasure and hobby with adequate protection of public health safety and
general welfare.
With regard to the density standards that are contained herein, "Net" shall
mean minimum lot size exclusive of private or publicly owned abutting road
rights-of-way while "Gross" shall include abutting road right-of-way, regardless
of ownership.
I1-8 flf�f���,iF2
Residential densities in the land use plan decrease as the distance from the
core increases. This serves to maintain the rural atmosphere of the
community together with defining a distinctive urban community. In order to
understand the city's residential policies, they must be considered in
conjunction with the policies of the housing element of the General Plan.
a. Single-Family Residential
Four categories of single-family residential land use are provided.
Implementing zoning shall provide that single-family dwellings are the
primary principal use permitted in each of these land use categories
with conditional uses defined that may be authorized subject to
findings of compatibility with the neighborhood.
(1) High Density
The minimum lot size for the creation of new lots within high
density single family residential areas shall be 1/2 acre, net. It is
the city's objective that all such areas be served with sewer.
S (2) Moderate Density
Minimum lot size for the creation of new lots within moderate
density areas shall be 1 acre (gross) if served by sewers and 1-
1/2 acres (gross) if not served by sewers.
(3) Low Density
Minimum lot size for the creation of new lots within the low
density residential areas shall range from 1-1/2 to 2-1/2 acres
gross. Determination of appropriate lot sizes shall be based
upon evaluation of such factors as slope, existence of a natural
building site, availability of sewer service, response time for
emergency services, distance from the center of the community,
general character of the neighboring lands, percolation
capability of the sc i propose or private sewage disposal
systems, adequacy of access, and adequacy of building site.
Low density residential areas are appropriate for areas within
the Urban Service Line where topography is relatively steep and
where scenic or sensitive characteristics of the
land should be 10
protected through lighter density urban residential designation.
(4) Suburban
Minimum lot sizes for the creation of new lots within the
suburban single-family residential category shall range from
2-1/2 to 10 acres, gross. Determination of appropriate lot sizes
shall be based upon evaluation of such factors as slope,
existence of a natural building site, availability of services,
response time for emergency services, distance from the center
of the community, general character of the neighboring lands,
percolation capability of the site, adequacy of access, and
adequacy of building site. Preference shall be given to
conventional septic systems and new lots shall not be created
which would require mound, evapotranspiration, or
evapotranspiration / infiltration sewage disposal systems. New
lots averaging 30% or more slope shall not be permitted;
provided that exceptions may be permitted when the following
conditions apply: (1) Such a lot contains a "building envelope"
with less than 20% average slope which includes building
footprint, access drives, leach field, etc., or (2) The creation of
such a lot offers public dedications or easements which would
have a direct benefit to city residents. This land use designation
is the predominate land use in terms of acreage in the land use
plan and occurs between the Urban Service Line and the Urban
Reserve Line.
b. Multiple-Family Residential
Two categories of multiple-family residential are provided for in the land
use plan: (1) high density, and (2) low density. In no event shall any
minimum lot size--except as may be authorized through planned unit
developments such as condominiums--be less than 1/2 acre. Further,
multi-family developments shall not be permitted except where public
sewer service is provided. In addition to apartments, townhouses and
patio houses, this land use category also provides for mobile home
developments including mobile home subdivisions or mobile home
parks. Multi-family areas are allowed only within the Urban Service
Line and zoning standards shall provide for amenities such as
11-10 0(i0011;;"
TABLE 11-2
RESIDENTIAL DENSITY STANDARDS
LAND USE CATEGORY MINIMUM LOT SIZE
WITH SEWER WITHOUT SEWER
Single-Familv Residential
High Density 1/2 ac. (Net) 1/2 ac. (Net)
Moderate Density 1 ac. (Gross) 1-Y2 ac. (Gross)
Low Density 1-'/2-2-'/2 ac. (Gross) 2-V2 ac. (Gross)
Suburban 2-Y2-10 ac. (Gross)
Multiple-Family Residential
High Density 16 1-bdr/ac. (Net) 2-1/2 ac./unit (Gross)
Low Density 10 1-bdr/ac. (Net) 2-1/2 ac./unit (Gross)
Note: Refer to text for detailed criteria.
* Suburban residential areas are outside of the Urban Service Line; however,
sewer service may be provided to "cease and desist areas" with the.
residential density standards to remain unaffected.
3. COMMERCIAL
The most challenging goal of the General Plan is to reverse the strip
commercial image of the city by implementing a land use strategy which
encourages and establishes the creation of strong specialized nodes along EI
Camino Real to meet the wide variety of commercial, retail and service needs
of the city and its trade area. In addition to land use policies which provide
for concentrations of compatible uses, the strengthening of the corridor will
require private and publicly-funded improvements to enhance the city's
image. These include development of a landscaped median along EI Camino
Real beginning with the downtown area but ultimately extending from Santa
Barbara Road to the edge of the retail commercial area northwest of San
Anselmo. In addition, the city will continue implementing its appearance
review and landscaping standards and seek implementation of the freeway
landscape plan prepared by the city for properties lying,between EI Camino
Real and Highway 101. Attractive and effective signage standards shall be
enforced for all the non-residential districts.
11-12
5. Participation in the impoundment of the Salinas River behind a
second dam downstream from the Santa Margarita Lake Dam,
on a site owned by Atascadero Mutual Water Company.
6. Participation in Nacimiento Water Project.
7. Participation in State Water Project.
The Water Company should expand and refine ongoing water
conservation programs to encourage prudent use of this valuable
resource.
(b) Sewage Disposal
The Urban Service Line encompasses 3,620 acres or about 5.7 square
miles of the city. Within this area, there are several improvement
districts totaling about 2,100 acres which are served by sanitary
sewers. In 1989, the city provided sewer service to 3,264 dwelling
units out of a city total of 8,031 dwelling units, or 41% of the population.
The average daily dry weather flow was 1,110,000 gallons per day, with
a peak dry weather flow of 1,745,000 gallons per day. The treatment
plant was designed to process 1.4 million gallons per day (mgd) and
can be expanded to 1.8 mgd with relatively minor improvements. A
sewer system master plan is being completed for the purpose of
providing for the city's planned sewage (and septage) disposal needs.
The Atascadero County Sanitation District (ACSD) was formed in 1956
and dissolved in 1988 with its duties assumed by the city. The original
sewage treatment plant is located at Traffic Way north of the Highway
41 bridge across Atascadero Creek. This plant is now the site of the
raw sewage pump station and is at the base of the city's gravity sewer
collection system. The site also serves as the city's corporation yard.
In 1978, voters approved a $1.3 million revenue bond as security for
the local share of a new treatment plant on an 80-acre site adjoining
the Salinas River south of Curbaril and northeast of the railroad tracks.
This plant was completed in November, 1983 with treated effluent
being pumped to either the Chalk Mountain Golf Course for irrigation
or to infiltration basins.
II-20
The city shall continue to require adequate fees to provide for the
orderly expansion of the treatment plant and collection system. The
Urban Service Line (USL) defines the maximum area that may be
served by the sewerage system and any revision to the USL would
require approval of a General Plan amendmgnt. Where major
expansions are proposed an Environmental Impact Report shall be
required.
Priority for provision of sewer service shall be as follows:
° Areas Not Requiring Amendment of the General Plan:
1. Cease and desist areas, and other septic problem areas
within the Urban Service Line.
2. Other areas within the Urban Service;Line.
3. Cease and desist areas beyond the Urban Service Line.
r Areas Requiring General Plan Amendment:
4. Other areas beyond the Urban Service Line requiring a
more intensive General Plan map land use designation
provided that the following findings are made:
a. Extension of sewer service to the area will not
overburden the city's sewer; plant or collection
system.
b. Extension of sewer service to the area will not
affect service to priority areas 1 through 3.
A majority of the city's developed area will continue to be served by
private sewage disposal. The Soil Conservation Service ranks much of
the suburban residential and agricultural designated lands in the city of
Atascadero as severe for septic systems, and most systems require
engineered plans. Percolation tests shall be performed for each such
lot prior to issuance of building permits. Percolation tests shall be
11-21 000f), ;
required prior to the processing of applications for parcel or tract maps
q p p 9
where private sewage disposal systems are proposed.
(c) Solid Waste Disposal
Solid waste collection and disposal is carried on by a city-granted
franchise. Participation in garbage collection has historically been
voluntary, and there are cases of garbage and trash dumping along
roadsides. Mandatory garbage collection shall be instituted for lands
within the Urban Reserve Line. Pursuant to state law, a program to
achieve maximum recycling of waste products generated by the
community shall be instituted to prolong the useful life of the Chicago
Grade Landfill. The city shall continue to support effective regional
planning for solid and hazardous waste disposal.
(d) Police Protection
Prior to incorporation, the city's police services were provide by a
sheriff's substation facility located in the Masonic Temple building in
the civic center area. Upon incorporation, police services were located
in the city Administration building. The configuration of the building
does not lend itself to an appropriate police facility. A site on the edge
of the downtown at EI Camino Real and Rosario has been selected to
serve the city's needs to full build-out.
Optimum location for a police facility is not as conditioned on
distribution of population as is the case for fire stations. Police
services are mobile and, therefore, the location is more flexible. The
new police facility is centrally located on a high profile site with ready
access to the arterial road system.
(e) Fire Protection
Fire protection within the city limits is provided by the Atascadero city
Fire Department, which has mutual aid agreements with the San Luis
Obispo County Fire Department and the California Department of
Forestry. The Atascadero city Fire Department operates out of two fire
stations, providing structure and wildland fire protection as well as
emergency medical and fire prevention services to the public.
II-22 O(tt4t) t�
1. g programs Support regional ro rams to maintain clean air. Toward this
end, adopt transportation and land use policies which
encourage vehicular trip reductions.
k. Underground utilities. All overhead utility wires should be
replaced with underground service.
L Protect historic buildings and sites. Atascadero's historic
buildings and features shall be preserved and protected in
recognition of the role the community's past plays in its present
and future. Consideration should be given to historic overlay
zoning to protect appropriate historic districts.
M. Salinas River Mining. Proposals to extract mineral resources
from the Salinas River channel shall be carefully evaluated to
ensure conformity with the State Surface Mining and
Reclamation Act, surface mining criteria contained within the
Zoning Ordinance, and flood hazard zoning standards (refer to
Technical Appendix - Mineral Resources Management).
E. IMPLEMENTATION
Once adopted, local units of government are mandated to implement general
plans (Government Code Section 65103(c)). State law also requires local
units of government to have subdivision and building regulations and open
space zoning, all of which are tools for plan implementation. Other plan
implementation measures are derived from state laws requiring consistency
of local actions with the adopted general plan.
1. GROWTH MANAGEMENT
Growth management consists of the systematic use of a combination
of techniques to shape community development. The land use plan
map is a "horizon" year plan portraying the desired ideal build-out of
the city of Atascadero. It is the objective of the City to reach that full
build-out at a rate of growth which allows concurrent provision of
adequate services necessary to meet the needs of additional growth,
including water sewage disposal, roads and reasonable emergency
response time to residences. Further, the plan's intent is to protect
both the environmental and aesthetic quality of the community by
11-34 00001117
subjecting development proposals to high standards. Development of
a sound economic base will be critical to maintaining and enhancing
the community's identity as a distinctive freestanding city.
Urban reserve and urban service line features of the plan are intended
to work in concert with strong open space policies of the county.
Urban uses should be developed within the urban service line;
suburban uses should be developed between the urban service and
the urban reserve lines with open space uses guaranteed by county
policies beyond the urban reserve line. The plan's policy of limiting
urban reserve line expansion to that area between the Salinas River
and EI Camino Real comprised of state and county-owned lands shall
be coordinated with the Local Agency Formation Commissions' sphere
of influence policies which should coincide with that of the city.
General plan revisions, subdivision and major development
applications for the unincorporated land within the city's planning area
and planning referral area should be referred to the city for review and
comment. The county should not.allow urban development or permit
further fracturing of rural areas beyond the city's urban reserve line. As
part of its land use ethic, the city recognizes that the right to the
economic use of land is a privilege involving the responsibility for
thoughtful stewardship.
A summary of the growth management techniques incorporated in the
Atascadero General Plan includes:
Acceptable annual population maximum growth rate goal of
2.5%.
Directing urban uses to locate within the urban services line.
° Directing suburban uses to locate between the urban service
line and the urban reserve line.
° Encouraging open space land uses and programs beyond the
urban reserve line.
° Environmental protection through conformity with California
Environmental Quality Act guidelines and open space and
conservation policies of the General Plan.
II-35 r1t�l�tt,x ;
Further, the policies of the conservation and open space elements in
particular shall be adhered to in reviewing both';; public and private
development proposals.
6. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMMING
No city capital project shall be implemented without first having been
reviewed for consistency with the general plan`;- and environmental
evaluations under the California Environmental Quality Act. Toward
this end, the planning commission shall annually review the proposed
capital improvement program of the city and proposed public works
projects for consistency with the general plan. Where major public
land acquisition or disposition is proposed, the planning commission
shall report to the City Council as to conformity of said action with the
general plan.
7. SPECIFIC PLAN
A "specific plan" is a tool enabled by state lava for the systematic
implementation of all or a portion of the area covered by a general
plan. A candidate area for potential alternative development is
identified in the general plan as the south Atascadero area.
Consideration of alternative land use categories for all or a portion of
that area shall require an application for a general'',plan amendment or
may be implemented by a specific plan. Should said plan be adopted
by the city in furtherance of the community's planning objectives, the
costs sustained by the applicant may be recovered in the future as a
surcharge to development applications proceeding under the change
in land use designation.
8. REDEVELOPMENT
Redevelopment combines both police and corporate powers and can
be one of the most powerful tools for implementing general plans.
Implementation of any adopted redevelopment plan - which must be
consistent with the city's general plan - may be accomplished to
revitalize blighted areas. Depending on the adopted plan, the
redevelopment agency, which may be the City Council, may acquire
land, manage property, relocate tenants, clear land, prepare sites,
build facilities, sell land, and rehabilitate buildings or structures.
II-38
F (rENF)
RESIDENTIAL SYMBOLS
HDMF HIGH DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY
LDMF LOW DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY E ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
MDSE MODERATE DENSITY SINGLE FAMILY
HDSF HIGH DENSITY SINGLE FAMILY JH JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL
LDSF LOW DENSITY SINGLE FAMILY
SSF SUBURBAN SINGLE FAMILY HS SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL
RR RURAL RESIDENTIAL
NON-RESIDENTIAL O FIRE STATION
NC NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL O CEMETERY
RC RETAIL COMMERCIAL
DOWNTOWN DOWNTOWN s�`°""
Sc SERVICE COMMERCIAL O LIBRARY
TC TOURIST COMMERCIAL BOUNDARIES
0 OFFICE
IND. PK. INDUSTRIAL PARK CITY LIMIT
IND. INDUSTRIAL
CPK COMMERCIAL PARK URBAN SERVICE LINE
..............
OTHER
P PUBLIC & QUASI-PUBLIC ' ' ' ' ' URBAN RESERVE LINE
REC RECREATION ft�M"gin
A AGRICULTURE
SPECIFIC PLAN AREA
LD)W /
11
RECREATION
V li
C�
�AVAER
r
,.#3 "� �I
CPK
Si
4
ROPA Tqp
I I r
�1
I
IMP
NO 111- low.
Van—Nu
`�� ,►` �` %%`'' ilk-'�'��
����♦ ��POP
VNISJL
«i . � .1i ► �-/`►��`�`•��L` �:--=--IUB:±�� ����r`��I-
��
WON— WIN
W . -
OP an
12
,�� ■ ��/111111111 �,���p���.��r
,� : quo ���
Itjt
-- !I!�►,�tt////.fit �♦i, •• � `,.
��. .;� �ter.: .r• ♦ � ,•, � r. �� RURAL
RESIDENTIAL51
��'� •
r ' iii►���`��.�i�i�����A��`` ��''� X1za
!1 �/1:���5 !�
IM
IP
VA
.ir L
� ���L�� rr�, ►• �' �
�► �♦�A,`_��,���I�girl
_ OMO
� tS����� .����.�
--jam
'/ ---
■ p- .� ,, -
f:
�imrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
ialu IslasPro em W&
rte ,
Wil�l► s',, ����� � • ��
'`�� _
VAN
I MIM
I PA
,.• �, �►. ���' -.rim■■► Imo. �,l'!+� I ��'. INNil
.
WWII
i► ; �' •••'��, ��� ••i �II�
1141H I
� �
r ► �� -
Map�i
r �
Moo 111oo'
Vo
jig
-Oil
WWI
900.0 rmomol*- ,
irjo-
MEN
M AS
♦ L �y�
► .• • ..• .� � •� •• •• lull � :_
��
,,14�.� i4 111► . ����► �C 1•IN
.fir►� ���. ;.AM��j �� ♦ ♦♦��,•��!� �a� err/ ♦ ���/
11�
F
. .
oto _ i =_� 1`
NIP
. � � �'��,. -act • �//l/i1 _
ML� Awl
7.,
♦ •ted
MIN
0 1 WMA OWNER.
ILI
i ,
j
r
Y/ /
-�` Urban Service Line Extended
'X<
12
t// _f,. ,��' . � � \\•, � _ •� / Vii/
• r-
CITY OF
ATASC,AOERQ
- � C. ALIPORN IA
ALTERNATIVE B
Figure 17
URBAN SERVICE
LINE EXTENSION
f *scadero : General Plan E/R Page 128
�►t�of "A
Urban Service Line Extended
�,• \ -�•` - —� -`'.-may- ..--- '___`'
ox�Jam'y , .J�I /��. ' !�••'�� 1� r-=� 1 `�, -�'� _�`�-C:G;::'-
i-'�.�'�`�;=� � , . I •;/ � •-' �,.��. 1 tip, �` �\;��-r�i...��L
,• 'lam".=, , � , �, / •����:
_ 1;� �'`��✓ `` Wil\i., `� . ':
--_"� ---�;',' ,t � � ._.. \r '•---;,-
------------
City O;