Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 05/11/1993 i RIBL1C REVIEW COPY N_. EMM AGENDA i ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL' REGULAR MEETING CITY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 6500 PALMA AVENUE, 4TH FLOOR ROTUNDA RC OM MAY 11, 1993 7:00 P.M. This agenda is prepared and posted pursuant to the requirements of Government Code Section 54954.2. By listing a topic on this agenda, the City Council has expressed its intent to discuss and act on each item. In addition to any action identified in the brief general description of each item, the action that may be taken shall include: A referral to staff with specific requests for information; continuance, specific dir ction to staff concerning the policy omission of the item discontinuance of consideratio authorization to enter into negotiations and execute agreements pertaining to the ite ; adoption or approval; and, disapproval. Copies of the staff reports or other documentation relating to each item of business referred to on the agenda are on file in the office of the City Clerk (Room 08) and in the Information Office (Room 103), available for public inspection during City Hall business hours. The City Clerk will answer any questions regarding the agenda o In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need specie assistance to participate in a City meeting or other services offered by this City, please contact the City Manager's Office ((805) 461-5010) or the City Clerk's Office ((805) 461-5 74). Notifica- tion at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time when services are neede will assist the City staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting or service. RULES OF PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: * Members of the audience may speak on any item on the aoenda. * A person may speak for five (5) minutes. * No one may speak for a second time until everyone wishing to speak has had an opportunity to do so. * No one may speak more than twice on any item. * Council Members may question any speaker; the speaker nay respond but, after the allotted time has expired, may not initiate further discussion. * The floor will then be closed to public participation and lopen for °Council discussion. i Call to Order Pledge of Allegiance . Roll Call City Council Comments Proclamations: "Perinatal Substance Abuse Prevention Awareness Week", May 9-15, 1993 "World TradeWeek", May 16-22, 1993 COMMUNITY FORUM: The City Council values and encourages exchange of ideas and comments from you, the citizen. The Community Forum period is provided to receive comments from the public on matters other than scheduled agenda items. To increase the effective- ness of Community Forum, the following rules will be enforced: A maximum of 30 minutes will be allowed for Community Forum, unless Council authorizes an extension. All remarks shall be addressed to Council, as a whole, and not to any individual member thereof. * No person shall be permitted to make slanderous, profane or personal remarks against any elected official, commissions and staff. A. COMMITTEE REPORTS (The following represent ad hoc or standing commit- tees. Informative status reports will be given, as felt necessary.): 1. S.L.O. Council of Governments 2. S.L.O. Regional Transit Authority 3. Solid/Hazardous Waste Task Force 4. City/School Committee 5. Traffic Committee 6. County Water Advisory Board 7. Economic Round Table 8. Colony Roads Committee 9. Liability Claims Review & Finance Committee B. CONSENT CALENDAR: All matters listed under Item B, Consent Calendar, are considered to be routine, and will be enacted by one motion in the form listed below. There will be no separate discussion on these items. A member of the Council or public may, by request, have any item removed from the Consent Calendar, which shall then be reviewed and acted upon-separately after the adoption of the Consent Calendar: 1. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 1993 2. RESOLUTION NO. 35-93 - Designation of no-parking zones on EI Camino Real at u-turn locations at the raised median 2 i 3. APPPROVAL OF CERTIFICATES OF ACCEPTANCE A. San Andres Avenue Bridge (R. Burke Corporation) B. Graves Creek Bridge (Whitaker Contractors, Inc.) C. S. EI Camino,Real Street Improvements (Whitaker Contractors, Inc.) 4. RESOLUTION NO. 24-93 - Approving City/CalTrans Traffi Signal Operational Cost-Sharing Agreement t 5._ RESOLUTION NO. 34-93 - Intent to enter into a cooperative agreement with S.L.O. County to establish joint participation in a Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program IIS 6 C. PUBLIC HEARINGS: None D. REGULAR BUSINESS: 1. CIRCULATION ELEMENT & FINAL EIR i A. Resolution No. 23-93 -Approving the adoption of a updated Circulation Element of the Atascadero General Plan (Cont'd from 4127193 meeting • with public hearing closed) 2. 3-F MEADOWS, TECORIDA AND LAS ENCINAS ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS - Informational meeting (Atascadero Street Improvement Project No. 1992) 3. CAMINO REAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT - Informationaleeting (Camino Real Improvement Project) n] 4. WIL-MAR RECYCLING ;CREDIT PROGRAM Consideration of replacing the recycling coupon program 5. LETTER FROM PASTOR TREY LITTLEJOHNS RE: CITY FACILITY POLICY 6. ORDINANCE NO. 269 (2nd reading)- Amending Title 6 of the City's Municipal Sanitation Code relevant to placing delinquent refuse collection charges on the property tax rolls (Recommend motion to adopt on secondreading by title only) E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION: 3 1. City Council 2. City Attorney 3. City Clerk 4. City Treasurer 5. City Manager f 3 E t 'Perinatal substance Abuse Awareness week" May 9-15, 1993 WHEREAS, Alcohol use during pregnancy is the leading preventable cause of birth defects, and the National Office of substance Abuse Prevention estimates that 73010 of babies have been prenatally exposed to alcohol; and WHEREAS, Infants exposed to alcohol and other drugs prenatally are at greater risk of developing learning disabilities; and WHEREAS, The estimate of prenatal exposure to cigarettes is 3801o, and tobacco is documented to contribute to low birth weight and asthma; and WHEREAS, The effects of illegal drug use during pregnancy is well documented, and the incidence rate of drug use in San Luis obispo county based on toxicology screening is 12 percent; and WHEREAS, The Safe Luis Obispo county Perinatal substance Abuse Prevention Coalition has collected data supporting evidence that any use of alcohol, tobacco or any drugs without physician direction during pregnancy or breastfeeding could cause harm; and WHEREAS, The Coalition has adopted as its slogan, "It's Not Worth the Risk" and urges all mothers to abstain during pregnancy; NOW THEREFORE the Atascadero Ci council does here o on record as su ortin h' by g pp g the 1993-94 Ca»ryaign for an Alcohol, Tobacco and other Drug-Free Pregnancy and proclaims May 9-15 dS "Perinatal substance Abuse Awareness week, ROBERT P. NIMMO, Mayor City of Atascadero, calVornia May 11, 1993 Perinatal Substance Abuse Prevention Coalition of San Luis Obispo'County', 994 Mill Street-Suite 201' San Luis Obispo, California 93401 Telephone (805) 781-4283 Kathryn Brewer,M.F.C.C. Chairperson �. Barbara J.Machado,M.A. Coordinator Phyllis Brsiotta and Pat Pequinot - Head Start Migrant Programs Laurie Baird,R.N.and TO: Honorable .City Council Rod Youngquist,M.S.W. Sierra Vista Hospital FROM: Barbara Machado, Perinatal Coalition Coordinator Caprice Brewer Child Protective Services Liz ClarIke DATE: May 3, 1993 Alpha Helen Ann Cunningham National Council on Alcoholism SUBJECT: Campaign for an Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drug- Sharon Frederick,M.S.W. Free Pregnancy and Aimee Williams Life Steps Foundation,Inc. SUMMARY Antonia Hampton Marposs Community Recovery Center Adoption of the attached proclamation endorsing the Perinatal Coalition's Linda Hog°boom,R.N. annual Campaign for an Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drug-Free Pregnancy Lucia Mar School District supports San Luis Obispo County's commitment to perinatal substance Pat Mattingly Recovery Counseling use P prevention and ongoingeducation about the effects of alcohol and Jeanne McAllister,R.N. other drugs on the unborn child. Twin Cities Community Hospital DISCUSSION Chelle Mueller,R.N. General Hospital Last year the Perinatal Substance Abuse .Prevention Coalition conducte� Jayma Newland and Nancy Welden its first annual campaign for an Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drug-Free County S`h°ol°ffice Pregnancy in cooperation with the Central Coast chapter of the California Dina Pinto,M.S. and Drug and Alcohol Services Restaurant Association and the San Luis Obispo County Child Abuse Prevention Council. Irene Vega,R.N. High Risk Infant Coordinator Janet Satacqua, R.N. This year, the Coalition launched a year-long campaign of education and Barbara Wella,M.S. activities on Mother's Day. Area restaurants offered pregnant and Tobacco Control Agency breastfeeding women a free non-alcohol beverage of their choice as their Advisory Council expression of support. Governor Wilson proclaimed the week of May 9- Cindy Marie Absey G SLO-CAP 15 '`Perinatal Substance Abuse Awareness" week. And artist Libby Margo Adler,L.C.S.W. Tolley of Los Osos has donated two mother/child watercolors that will be Health Department used on educational materials and will, with last year's painting, form a Carol Allen,J.D. Superior Court collection that will be loaned to public institutions and private business as Rene H.Bravo,M.D. a centerpiece for an educational effort. Barbara Clutter,M.D. Katrina Rosa from county Drug and Alcohol Services will be present to Karen Gray District Attorney's Office represent the Coalition and to receive the proclamation. Ginny Lazzarini and Gretchen Potter March of Dimes Dominick Lacovars, L.C.S.W. San Luis Medical Clinic Dan Lickness, M.D. Darlene Newby-Watson, Ph.D. Dale Rowland, M.D. Susan Zepeds, Ph.D. Director,Health Agency EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA A PROCLAMATION by the Governor of. the State of California WHEREAS, each year, approximately 90,000 infants in California are exposed prenatally to alcohol and other drugs, resulting in many of these infants being hospitalized in intensive care units requiring long-term hospital care; and WHEREAS, alcohol use during pregnancy is the leading cause of preventable mental retardation in newborns; and WHEREAS, infants exposed to alcohol and other drugs in the womb ,are at greater risk of developing learning disabilities; and WHEREAS, more than one million women of child-bearing age abusealcohol and other drugs; and WHEREAS, pregnancy represents an ideal time to intervene in generational patterns of addiction; NOW, THEREFORE, I, PETE WILSON, Governor of the State of California, do hereby snm proclaim May 9-15, 1993 as Perinatal Substance Abuse Awareness Week in California, reflecting the goals of my Administration of "Preventive Government," which is designed to encourage early awareness and responsibility in health care and greater understanding of the dangers of perinatal exposure to alcohol and other drugs. IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Great Seal of the State of California to be affixed this 2nd day of April 1993. Governor of California - AT=: S " Secretary of State Annual Campaign for a - Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drug-Free Pregnancy � o Sponsored by the San Luis Obispo County Perinatal Substance Abuse Prevention Coalition ' a`g 994 Mill Street, Suite 201 San Luis Obispo, California 93401 s Telephone 18051 781-4283 "Its Not Worth the Risk , �ilPdi° SA Perinatal Substance Abuse Ouestions and Answers Q: How serious a problem is use of alcohol and other drugs during pregnancy`' A: Very serious. The United States ranks 24th in infant mortality rates among industrial nations. it averages 9.1 infant deaths per 1,000 live births. The rates range from 6.9 deaths a year for children under a year old in Anaheim/Santa Ana, to 23.3 deaths a year in Washington,. D.C.. Behavioral factors that contribute to high infant mortality rates include smoking during pregnancy; drinking alcohol; using crack, cocaine or other drugs; poor diet and nutrition; and not seeking health care early and throughout the pregnancy. Q:: How many mothers don't get prenatal carer A: Nearly 25 percent of mothers receive no prenatal care during their first trimester of pregnancy. More than 6 percent receive no care at all or wait until the third trimester to seek care. This is costly....for every $1 spent on routine prenatal care for high-risk women, more than $3 is saved in after-delivery costs. Q: What is the dollar cost of premature or low birthweight babies?` A: Care for each premature baby costs between $10,000 and $25,000 with- a total national cost- estimate ostestimate of $2.billion a year. About 250,000 babies with low birthweight (less than 5.5 pounds) are.-, born in the United States every year. That's one every two minutes. Although they make up only,T percent of all live births, low birthweight babies account for about 60 percent of infant deaths. Babies born weighing less than 5.5 pounds are 20 times as likely to die as those born weighing more. Babies born below 3.3 pounds are about 40 times as likely to die as those weighing more than.5.5 pounds. Q: Are there other costs? A: Yes! There are significant other costs. There is a growing body of knowledge regarding both direct and indirect cost of substance use during pregnancy. The immediate after-birth effects on- babies exposed prenatally exposed to heroin or cocaine are well known. But only now are we beginning to see the Grave problem such exposure causes for development and behavior in the children both pre-school and school age. Less well know is pre-natal damage from alcohol and tobacco use. Alcohol is the number one preventable cause of mental retardation. And it is well • known and accepted that cigarettes can contribute to low birth weight, asthma and increased rates of lung cancer. The potential dollar cost from direct treatment and giving children who have been prenatally exposed the extra help they need is enormous. But the human cost in lack of ability to reach potential is incalculable. ARSo the problems don't disappear when the infant grows and "catches up,,, so to speak': : No. An infant born with FAS (Fetal Alcohol Syndrome), for example, is not suffering an addiction to alcohol, from which he or she could recover after a difficult withdrawal period. The pattern of birth defects associated with heavy alcohol use is irreversible and permanent. A child prenatally exposed to drugs or alcohol may exhibit behavior problems. Q: What kind of problems? A: These children may have problems such as hyperactivity, slow development, tempermentalness,, and difficulty paying attention. When overstimulated, prenatally exposed children may become explosive, or they may "shut down." Frequently, substance exposed children may have Attention Deficit Disorder. They may exhibit explosive rages. Q: How do you handle such behavior'' A: The first thing to remember is that you mustn't label a child as possibly substance exposed just because of behavior. It takes an expert to evaluate Attention Deficit Disorderand to determine the origins of behavioral or developmental problems. If you are with a child who is explosive or who shuts down, however, you should assume first that the behavior is physiologically based. Q: What do you mean by that A: Overstimulation of prenatally exposed children may cause overload cues that can range from gaze aversion. and shallow breathing to bolting out of the room or assuming the fetal position.. Don't try to reason with the child verbally. Approach the child from the side and apply a firm, steady touch to the shoulder or forearm. Calmly and slowly remove the child from the overtimulating environment without talk. Pace with the child, using a repetitive, non-meaningful verbal phrase such as, "It's time to talk now. Use. dim lights and soft music. Allow "cocooning in a beanbag chair or in a floor pillow. Q: How can someone find out more facts about things like overstimulation of prenatally exposed children, and about alcohol and other drug use during pregnancy`'' A: You can call call county Drug and Alcohol Seryices, 781-4283, as a beginning referral. There Referral Lin 1-800-662-HELP, that provides: is anational Drug Abuse Information and Treatment e, information about drug use, treatment, support groups, and services. The National Clearinghouse I Alcohol and Drug Information, L-800-729-6686, disseminates a wide rare of materials on drug education,.prevention and treatment. Ask for the. ONCADI catalogue. The Center for Substance: Abuse Prevention has an information and referral service available at 1-800-354-8824: There is a: State Resource Center within the Department of Alcohol and Drug Program available by calling 1— 800-879-2772. Q: What are we doing in San Luis Obispo County to address this problem`'' A: in San Luis Obispo County, various agencies have formed the Perinatal Substance-Abuse Prevention Coalition. The Coalition meets on the fourth Thursday of every month at county Drug and Alcohol Services, 1002A Laurel Lane, San Luis Obispo. Meetings are from 12 noon to 1:15 p.m. Anyone is invited to attend. The goals of PSAP are prevention through education at both public and professional level. The Coalition also seeks to stretch funds as far as possible through. networking and cooperation. Sources: Infant Monahry. Healthy Start Campaign, Health Resources and Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Service, 1992 Annual Campaign for Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drug-Free Pregnancy V Sponsored by the San Luis Obispo County Perinatal Substance Abuse Prevention Coalition • 994 Mill Street, Suite 201 San Luis Obispo, California 93401 Telephone /805/ 781-4283 •.At- rf' "/t's Not Worth the Risk" FACT SHEET ON PER/NA TA SUBSTANCE ABUSE Women of all economic groups are impacted by substance abuse during pregnancy. Studies conducted by the National Association for Perinatal Research and Education in Chicago show there is no significant difference in the number of middle and upper income .women using drugs during pregnancy versus low income and minority women. Numerous studies conducted throughout the U.S. confirm this finding. o Alcohol exposure during pregnancy is the most common preventable cause of mental retardation. o When a woman drinks, her babydrinks because the alcohol asses direct) through p Y 9 the placenta to the baby. o According to the national Office of Substance Abuse Prevention, 73% of babies born in the U.S. have been prenatally exposed to alcohol. o In the United States, one out of every 750 babies is born with Fetal Alcohol Syndrome. Babies born with FAS are abnormally small at birth and usually do not catch up as they get older. Most babies with FAS have small brains and some degree of learning impairment. Many are poorly coordinated, have short attention spans and exhibit behavioral problems. o Children who have some, but not all, of the signs of FAS have Fetal Alcohol Effects (FAE); these are a group of birth defects that have no cure. o Using alcohol during pregnancy can cause growth deficiency, facial malformations, central nervous system dysfunction and major organ system malformations. o There is no safe time during pregnancy to drink nor is there a safe amount of alcohol for a pregnant woman to consume. There are two reasons: (1 ) because alcohol interferes with the developing brain of the embryo/fetus and the brain remains sensitive to harmful agents throughout pregnancy; and (2) because everyone metabolizes alcohol differently. So, the same amount of alcohol, consumed at the same time by two pregnant women, may be harmful to one developing baby but not the other. The best way to ensure that alcohol will not harm an unborn baby is not to drink during pregnancy. Over o In San Luis Obispo County, the incidence rate of drug use based on toxicology screening is 12 percent. Locally, it is estimated that a primary contributing factor in 60% of Child Protective Service caseload and referrals is alcohol and other drug abuse. During 1992, CPS received 3,620 reports of child abuse or neglect. o Babies prenatally exposed to narcotics suffer withdrawal symptoms: disturbed sleep, vomiting, diarrhea, seizures, shaking, restless. o One recent study found that 15 percent of babies whose mothers abused cocaine throughout pregnancy died of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome. o Children prenatally exposed to drugs have problems such as hyperactivity, slow development, tempermentalness, and-difficulty paying attention at home or school. o Children who have been prenatally exposed to cocaine or crack have significant risk for developmental and learning disabilities. o A recent study by a University of Washington psychologist found that women who averaged one or two drinks a day during the first two months of pregnancy had children with slow reaction times and difficulty paying attention. The National Council on Alcoholism and Drug Dependency estimates that 36,000 babies will be born this year with Fetal Alcohol Effects. o The Council for Aicohol/Drug Education states in its October 1991 newsletter that evidence is accumulating that men's exposure to a variety of substances--before they father a child--can affect the health of their unborn children. o It is well known and accepted that prenatal and passive exposure to cigarette can contribute to low birth weight, asthma and increased rates of lung cancer. o Women smokers are three to four times more likely than nonsmokers to take longer than one ,year to conceive, according to a study done in the United Kingdom and reported in The Lancet. Researchers found a direct association between reduced fertility and the level of cotinine, a breakdown product of nicotine. o Mothers who smoke during and after pregnancy are more likely to have children with behavior problems, according a Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester School of Medicine study. They found that behavior problems increased as the mother's smoking increased. o Women who abuse drugs are at risk for HIV infection, as well as other venereal diseases which they may transmit to their unborn child. o Using cocaine or crack while pregnant increases the risk of spontaneous abortion, premature deiivery, low birth weight, heart defects, cerebral infarction and serious neurological abnormalities. Amphetamines, including crank and ice, can increase the chance of miscarriage; cause heart and brain defects; and cause growth retardation. world Trade week" May 16-22, 1993 WHEREAS, World Trade Week was initiated as a local grogram by the Los Angeles chamber of commerce in 1926 and declared a national observance by President Franklin Roosevelt in 1935; and WHEREAS, Nearly 60% of California's real economic growth came from eXyorts last year; and WHEREAS, Trade activity creates jobs both directly and indirectly, and few industries can afford to ignore international markets in today's global economy; and WHEREAS, The Cal fornia Central Coast World Trade Center Association (CCCWTCA) is a non profit, membership-driven organization, bringing businesses and government agencies together to Promote international trade; and WHEREAS, To commemorate World Trade Week 1993 on the Central Coast, the CCCWTCA is conducting the first annual Central Coast conference, entitled "Economic Revitalization through International Trade", to be held on May 20th at the Hyatt Westlake Plaza Hotel, Westlake village, California; NOW, THEREFORE, I, ROBERT P. NIMMO, Mayor of the City of Atascadero, do hereby proclaim ma. through 22, 1993 as "World Trade Week" in order to yromote the public's awareness o f the vital role international trade ylays in sustaining the economy and encouragifg growth. ROBERT P. NIMMO, Mayor city of Atascadero, CalVornia May 11, 1993 CALIFORNIA CENTRAL COAST WORLD TRADE CENTER ASSOCIATION April 29, 1993 The Honorable Robert Nimmo Mayor City of Atascadero 6500 Palma Avenue Atascadero, CA 93422 Dear Honorable Mayor Nim-mo: On behalf of the California Central Coast World Trade Center Association (CCCWTCA), I am writing to seek a resolution from the City of Atascadero recognizing World Trade Week 1993 and the first annual Central Coast World Trade Week program, entitled "Economic Revitalization Through International Trade." This exciting event will be held on May 20, 1993, from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., at the Hyatt Westlake Plaza Hotel, Westlake Village. Providing a resolution is an opportunity to play an integral part in the most important international business summit of the year. ' h Southern California's World Trade Week activity ><s celebrated each year in concert with the national observance of World Trade Week,which was initiated as a local program by the Los Angeles Chamber of Commerce in 1926 and declared a national observance by President Franklin Roosevelt in 1935. World Trade Week will be officially observed May 16-22, 1993. Commemorating World Trade Week 1993 on the Central Coast, this first annual conference will promote the concept of economic development through international trade. At a time when government and industry are looking for innovative ways to revitalize business and encourage economic development, international trade offers exciting possibilities. With the City of Atascadero's support, we would appreciate your resolution received at our address before May 18, to allow time for our staff to layout a display of resolutions for the conference. Thank you for helping us take advantage of the national World Trade Week observance and bringing this important summit to the Central Coast. Sincerely, Shawn Gallegly Assistant Director Enclosures 300 Esplanadc Drivc,suitc 1010 •Oxnard,California 93030•(805)988-1406• FAX(805)988-1862 • NETWORK Codc WTCOX CALIFORNIA CENTRAL COAST WORLD TRADE CENTER ASSOCIATION The California Central Coast World Trade Center Mission Statement: The California Central Coast World Trade Center Association (CCCWTCA) is a public-private partnership opening doors to economic development through international trade. Description: The California Central Coast World Trade Center Association is a non-profit, membership driven organization bringing businesses and government agencies together to promote international trade. The rapidly growing Oxnard based center provides information, communication services and trade assistance to companies in the Central Coast region from Malibu to Monterey and as far East as Kern County. The Center, celebrating its eighth year of operation, offers its members reciprocal privileges at more than 250 World Trade Centers in 61 countries around the globe. The Program: Economic Revitalization Through International Trade -World Trade Week 1993 To commemorate World Trade Week 1993 on the Central Coast, the California Central Coast World Trade Center Association is conducting the first annual Central Coast conference to promote the concept of economic development through international trade. The conference,Econornic Revitalization Through International Trade, will be held May 20, 1993, from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., at the Hyatt Westlake Plaza Hotel, Westlake Village, California. Southern California's World Trade Week activity is celebrated each year in concert with the national observance of World Trade Week, which was initiated as a local program by the Los Angeles Chamber of Commerce in 1926 and declared a national observance by President Franklin Roosevelt in 1935. World 11 rade Week will be officially observed May 16-22, 1993,and the CCCWTCA is making a concerted effort to publicize the event and encourage participation in activities throughout the week. Nearly 60% of California's real economic growth came from exports last year. Trade activity creates jobs both directly and indirectly and few industries can afford to ignore international markets in today's global economy. The CCCWTCA's objective in spearheading a Central Coast celebration of World Trade Week is to increase public awareness of the vital role international trade plays in sustaining the economy and encouraging growth. A key component of the Economic Revitalization Through International Trade conference is an unprecedented matchmaking meeting between Trade Commissioners and Consul Generals from over 20 countries and participating businesses, cities and counties throughout the Central Coast. The purpose of this meeting is to introduce officials from the participating municipalities to business retention/attraction opportunities available through international channels. The program will also include presentations and panel discussions on current issues of importance, such as The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), Port Hueneme's Role for the Central Coast,Aerospace and Defense Industry Conversion,International Agribusiness Marketing,International Business Incubators,Advanced Telecommunications, Basics of Exporting. Confirmed speakers include this year's Wcrld Trade Week Chairman, Mr. Fermin Cuza, Vice President of International Trade and Government Affairs for Mattel, Inc., Mr. Anthony Taormina, Executive Director, Oxnard Harbor District, Mr. Stephen Arlinghaus, Director, Los Angeles District Office, Department of Commerce U.S. Foreign and Commercial Service, and Mr. Gregory Mignano, Executive Director of the California World Trade Commission. 10 The CCCWTCA has the support of the Central Coast communities including sponsor support from: The Oxnard Harbor District-Port of Hueneme and its users, GTE, Sunkist, Oxnard College Center for International Trade Development, Southern California Gas Company, Southern California Edison, Deloitte & Touche, The Oxnard Press Courier, The Sun Newspapers, and the Cities of Oxnard, Santa Barbara and Simi Valley. _,00 Esplanade Driti e.Suite 1010-Oxnard,California 93030•(805)988-1406• FAX(805)988-1862•NETWORK Code WTCOX Agenda Item: B-1 Meeting Date: 05/11/93 ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL APRIL 13, 1993 MINUTES The Mayor called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Councilperson Luna led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL: Present: Councilmembers Bewley, Borgeson, Kudlac, Luna and Mayor Nimmo Absent: None Also Present: Muriel "Micki" Korba, City Treasurer and Lee Raboin, City Clerk Staff Present: Andy Takata, Assistant City Manager/Director of Community Services; Henry Engen, Community Development Director; Art Montandon, City Attorney; Mark Joseph,Administrative Services Director; Mike McCain, Eire Chief; Bud McHale, Police Chief; Steve Sylvester, City Engineer and Steve DeCamp, City Planner PROCLAMATIONS: Mayor Nimmo read the proclamation for "Public Schools Week", April 19, 1993 and presented it to Chief McCain, accepting on behalf of the Masons... In addition, the Mayor read the proclamation for "Earthquake Preparedness Month", April 1993 and presented it to Chief McHale. COUNCIL COMMENTS: Councilwoman Borgeson noted she has received telephone calls regarding graffiti and asked for a progress report. Chief McHale indicated that a committee is being formed by members of the PTA, School District, City staff and others in the community interested in addressing this problem. He reported that while investigations are on- going, the department would soon refer six suspects to the justice system. In CC 04/13/92 Page 1 addition, the Chief mentioned that staff was looking at a potential ordinance modeled after other cities. Councilman Kudlac suggested that the Council adopt a resolution announcing that it has no tolerance for graffiti and encouraging community service punishment and/or other appropriate judicial discipline for violators. Staff was directed to draft said resolution and bring back for Council action. COMMUNITY FORUM: Ray Jansen, 6655 Country Club Drive, appealed to all to walk, or sponsor someone to walk, in the 10k "Walk for Hunger" April 25, 1993. William Carlyle requested assistance with changing the use of a Colony home at 5715 Rosario from apartments to an art gallery or museum. The matter was referred to staff. Tray Littlejohns, Pastor Christ Chapel, questioned City policy as it relates to the use and rental of City-owned facilities. He asked the Council to direct the City Attorney to research and cite specific State Law that would substantiate the policy. Art Montandon indicated that the answer was not an easy one and clarified that he would have no authority to investigate the matter without Council approval. By mutual consent, Council directed staff to provide a report outlining City policies relating to • this item. Margaret Thornton, 8760 Junipero, stated that it was difficult to negotiate a left turn onto El Camino Real from Junipero and suggested extending the red-curbing on EI Camino Real in front of the physical therapy office. This matter was referred to the Traffic Committee. Terrill Graham, 6205 Conejo Road, proclaimed it inappropriate for staff to speak out in public on political issues. He suggested that the City Council adopt a policy delineating specific guidelines for public statements made by members of City staff. Councilwoman Borgeson indicated that she thought this was an appropriate issue for Council discussion and action. Doug Byles, 7777 San Gregorio Road, read portions of his Letter to the Editor (Atascadero News - 3/31/93). Because Mr. Byles made mention of the raised median issue, the Mayor suggested his comments might be more pertinent taken with other public commentary during discussions relating to Regular Business Item #D-1. Mr. Byles agreed to reserve his testimony until such time. CC 04/13/92 Page 2 A. COMMITTEE REPORTS (The following represent ad hoc or standing commit- tees. Informative status reports were given, as follows.): 1. Solid/Hazardous Waste Task Force - Henry Engen reported that the task force had met on April 1, 1993. 2. County Water Advisory Board - Councilwoman Borgeson reported that the board had met 4/7/93, at which time discussions ensued regarding "Nacimiento Water". She asked staff to check with Atascadero Mutual Water regarding their entitlement request for this water source. B. CONSENT CALENDAR: Mayor Nimmo read the Consent Calendar, as follows: 1. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MARCH 9, 1993 2. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MARCH 23, 1993 3. TRAFFIC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: A. RESOLUTION NO. 18-93 - Designating the placement of a stop intersection on Corriente Avenue @ Santa Ana Road B. RESOLUTION NO. 19-93 - Designating the placement of a stop intersection on Corona Road @ Santa Ana Road C. RESOLUTION NO. 20-93 - Designating the placement of a stop intersection on Balboa Road @ Santa Ana Road 4. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 92003, 7365 SANTA YSABEL Consideration of a request to create a five-unit residential condominium project, including the conversion of one existing unit and the construction of four new units (Semmes/Cuesta Engineering) 5. CONTRACT AWARD FOR PORTABLE HYDRAULIC PUMP UNIT 6. RESOLUTION NO. 22-93 - ..Authorizing participation on the S.L.O. County Regional Hazardous Materials Response Team 7. ART PROJECT - POLICE FACILITY I CC 04/13/92 Page 3 Item #13-5 was pulled for correction and clarification. Councilman Luna pulled Item #B-2 for correction. • MOTION: By Councilman Luna, seconded by Councilman Kudlac to approve Consent Calendar Items #B-1, 3, 4, 6 & 7; motion carried unanimously by roll call vote. By mutual consent, Item #B-2 was continued to April 27, 1993. Re: Item #B-5. CONTRACT AWARD FOR PORTABLE HYDRAULIC PUMP UNIT Henry Engen pointed out a mathematical correction. Councilwoman Borgeson inquired about the legality of R.F. MacDonald's bid revision as referred to in the staff report. The City Attorney asked that the matter be continued so that he might have the opportunity to look at the issue. C. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. ROAD ABANDONMENT/LLA 93-001, 9325 CURBARIL AVE. - Request for consideration of a road abandonment and lot line adjustment which conflicts with prior City Council action on this issue Henry Engen provided background and the staff report. Council questions followed regarding former Council approval and contingency. It was clarified that there are . presently two legal lots and the owner could, if he chooses, tear down the existing residence--which is located on the lot line--and build two. In addition, Mr. Engen confirmed that another home could not be built without the lot line adjustment. Councilwoman Borgeson reiterated support for the prior approval. Public Comments: Kelly Gearhart, applicant, spoke in favor of his request to obtain the lot line adjustment without the lot merger. He pointed out that he desires to enlarge the lot and does not wish to tear down the existing home. Councilman Bewley asked Mr. Gearhart if perk tests were completed on the property. The applicant indicated that they had and reported that there was room for two septic systems on the subject parcels. ---End of Public Testimony--- CC 04/13/92 Page 4 Councilman Luna noted that he had opposed the road abandonment request when the item came before the Planning Commission in 1991 and indicated that he was not in favor of reconsidering the matter. MOTION: By Councilman Luna, seconded by Councilwoman Bo geson to deny the that the subject reconsideration and leave intact prior approval requiring parcels be legally merged as a condition of approval of the road abandonment; motion carried 3:2 with Councilmembers Bewley and Kudlac voting in opposition. O. REGULAR BUSINESS: 1. EL CAMINO REAL MEDIAN - City Engineer's Report (Cont'd from 2123/93) After brief introduction, Steve Sylvester reported that the Police Departmentaddition, completed a speed survey on South EI Camino Real and provided a d aft . proposed he explained that engineering staff had monitored traffic, modifications to the median and estimated associated n alterat onst as roductionn Mr. Sylvester highlighted four recommendation for media the staff report. C questions uestions followed regarding recommended revisions, projectedco costs and ed available funding. Councilwoman Borgeson asked whether staff removing the median from EI Bordo to Maple (instead of to s alternative an Dad n). Steve Sylvester indicated that, based on Council direction, rnativ one-third more en considered by staff and projected that it would cost approximately than what was proposed. Councilman Kudlac commented that although he favored making he entire concept from e alterations to the newly-constructed median, he was not prepared to strike the General Plan or the Downtown Master Plan. Public Comments: Jay DeCou, 9200 Pino Solo, spoke on behalf of RAM (Residents Agai nsthnt he Median) and made the following recommendations. 1) Remove the s of median to accommodate the Colombo reside�hce�dianlow to allow two way left turn a turn pocket for the Biaggini project, 3) Modify the northern end of traffic from EI Bordo to Musselman, 4) Install a traffic stop light at the entrance to the State Hospital when funds become avaaddition, dditiand Mr) DeCouon all plans for pointed out thatuture H.D median projects on El Camino Real. In add , Peterson of $12,000 to remove the median and of Atascadero had given RAM a q ` CC 04/13/92 i' Page 5 reiterated that RAM was willing to contribute approximately $2,500 towards that cost. Dorothy McNeil, 8765 Sierra Vista Road, read a prepared statement (see Exhibit A) in support of the median and in opposition to expending any funds on its' removal. Ed Biaggini, 10700 EI Camino Real, thanked staff to responding to the public and making recommendations for certain modifications. He reported that he had received an estimate from his contractor for completing the modification recommended by staff at the entrance to his new development and noted that it was almost half the cost. He cautioned the Council to get the best price for the work. Eric Greening,7365 Valle, stated he believed that medians promote strip development and indicated that he had reservations about the installation of future raised medians. He suggested that additions of concrete and trees be made for the benefit of pedestrians and encouraged the Council to look for creative solutions to traffic problems. Chuck Duveneck, 5260 Maleza and representing the California Dump Truck Association, argued that hauling and delivering materials to merchants on EI Camino Real becomes very difficult when u-turns must be negotiated. Norman Young, 9184 Birch, asserted that the City Council should get rid of the median. Joan O'Keefe, 9985 Old Morro Road East, spoke in favor of the raised, landscaped median because it discourages strip development and provides traffic safety. She added that the concept should not be abandoned and urged the Council to spend the least amount of money necessary to address the deficiencies. Robert Shaw, 5465 Capistrano, asked for clarification of the State Hospital's participation in the median project. Mark Joseph explained that the State had contributed $150,000 to the project and reported that the additional funds came from City gas taxes and developer funds. Jon DeMoralis, Executive Director of the Atascadero State Hospital, read a prepared statement (see Exhibit B) outlining the hospital's position. Al Wilkins, 8050 San Clemente, announced that as a hospital employee he appreciated the median and exclaimed that his trip to work was now much safer. CC 04/13/92 Page 6 Dan Phillips, 8800 El Camino Real, read a portion of a letter he had received from the governor explaining how City transit funds and State Mental Health Department monies can be used. He urged the Council to pursue the installation of a traffic signal light at the intersection of El Camino Real and the State Hospital. Mike Godfrow, President of the California Association of Psychiatric Technicians at Atascadero State Hospital, reported that members of that association support the raised median and the concept of adding a traffic signal. Don Cole, 10475 Cuesta Court, stated that he liked Councilwoman Borgeson's suggestion of removing the median from EI Bordo to Maple. He added that he disapproved of the choices for shrubbery and trees. John McNeil, 8765 Sierra Vista, pointed out that safety was more important than convenience and warned the Council to only let licensed and bonded contractors make modifications. Calvin Lester, 6570 Morro Road, opposed further construction of any medians on EI Camino Real. Doug Byles, 7777 San Gregorio, continued comments he began expressing under Community Forum. He pointed out benefits of following a master plan for the community. He also complained about a yard in approximately the 3400 block of Ramona at Monterey Road and asked why materials there couldnot be fenced or concealed. In addition, Mr. Byles offered other suggestions relating to balancing the City's budget. ---End of Public Testimony--- Council discussion followed regarding traffic speed in the subject area. The Police Chief noted that a traffic signal at the entrance to the State Hospital would significantly slow traffic. The City Engineer provided a summary of the steps necessary to approve a signal light and agreed that signalization would reduce speeding. Councilwoman Borgeson asserted that, based on telephone calls she had received,the public would support a traffic signal on South El Camino Real, but does not favor a raised median any far north than the one recently constructed. She stated that the median was poorly planned and that the entire concept was a' bad idea for the community and, if installed, would be detrimental to established businesses on El Camino Real. In closing, Councilwoman Borgeson asked that Council give considera- CC 04/13/92 Page 7 tion to her proposal of eliminating the median in front of Rancho Del Bordo and the Perkins Mobilehome Park. Councilman Bewley remarked that compromise must be reached and modifications made as needed to the existing median. He noted that there was much to be learned by the experience and speculated that there will be ample opportunities for public input in the design of any future median projects. MOTION: By Councilman Kudlac, seconded by Councilman Bewley to remove the southerly thirty feet of the median at the Columbo residence; motion approved unanimously. MOTION: By Councilman Kudlac, seconded by Councilman Bewley to remove the existing median from El Bordo to California Manor; motion carried 4:1 (Councilman Luna opposed). MOTION: By Councilman Kudlac, seconded by Councilman Bewley to construct a northbound left turn opening for the Biaggini tract; motion carried 4:1 (Councilman Luna opposed). MOTION: By Councilman Kudlac, seconded by Councilman Luna to direct staff to continue discussions with Atascadero State Hospital regarding the installation of a traffic signal at the State Hospital entrance at the earliest date possible; motion carried 5:0 by roll call vote. MOTION: By Councilman Kudlac, seconded by Councilman Luna to increase the length of no parking zones "red curb areas" at all u-turn locations to a minimum of sixty feet; motion carried 5:0 by roll call vote. 2. TEMPLETON SERVICE DISTRICT - Consideration of request to explore extension of City sewer service to the Templeton Community Services District Henry Engen provided the staff report and recommendation to cooperate with the Templeton Community Service District in exploring the pros and cons of possibly providing sewage treatment service to Templeton. If authorized, he concluded, staff would prepare an analysis for further Council review and direction. Councilman Kudlac indicated that he was in support of having staff study the matter. Councilwoman Borgeson stated she did not favor paying for such a study. Councilman Luna remarked that he would like to be presented with cost projections. CC 04/13/92 _ Page 8 . Public Comment: Eric Greening cautioned staff to thoroughly investigate the potential location of the sewage pipeline. ---End of Public Testimony--- By mutual consent, staff was authorized to explore the concept and report back. 3. CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES REPORT - Response to citizen's complaints at March 23rd City Council meeting Steve DeCamp provided an overview of City's permit review process and building inspection procedures. In addition, he gave a status report on the building activities at 9800 Corriente and 7005 Rayar. Councilman Luna inquired about requirements for sedimentation';control and shared concerns relating to specific development on Ardilla Road at Graves Creek. He stated that he would like to see the Council set some kind of policy to control sedimentation and protect adjacent properties. Henry Engen pointed out that new standard project conditions require sedimentation and erosion control plans and noted that the City Engineer is responsible for ensuring that these conditions are being met. Additional questions followed regarding development on slopes. Public Comments: Karen Oakes, 6705 Llano Road, reiterated complaints addressed, in her letter to the Council dated March 23, 1993 and expressed concern that the building process does not allow input from downhill neighbors. She urged the 'Council to ensure enforcement of the City's existing codes. Marcia Torgerson, 6200 Llano Road, read portions of a prepared statement (see Exhibit C) and cited specific ordinance sections she believes need refinement or are not now being enforced. She too asked the Council to insist that the City's Zoning Ordinance be complied with. Andy McMeans, 6150 Llano Road, spoke in support of Ms. Oakes's suggestion to reduce building permit approvals if the City is unable to enforce regulations due to staffing limitations. CC 04/13/92 _ Page 9 ---End of Public Testimony--- . Councilman Luna asked staff to clarify whether or not a permit is required to begin "grubbing" or clearing a site of vegetation. He argued that a permit should be required before a bulldozer is used to scrape or clear a building site. Steve DeCamp indicated the Uniform Building Code does not require a permit for simply removing vegetation. He pointed out that the City's Zoning Ordinance does not allow "padding" or preparing a building pad and then putting up the lot for sale. Councilwoman Borgeson asserted that the City needs to enforce its' building standards diligently and that the Council must be made aware if the job cannot be done by staff. Councilmembers Bewley and Luna concurred. No formal action was taken. The report was received and filed. 4. DIAL-A-RIDE REPORT - Response to Council's March 23rd direction Henry Engen provided the staff report and recommendation to refer the question of expanding Dial-A-Ride service hours and/or days to the 1993-94 budget process. Public Comments: Rush Kolemaine, Box 1990, remarked that there was a need for improved service and proposed that by increasing Dial-A-Ride services, the City may increase local sales tax revenue. ---End of Public Testimony--- MOTION: By Councilman Bewley, seconded by Councilman Kudlac to extend the meeting beyond 11:00 p.m.; motion carried unanimously. Council agreed to refer the question of expanding Dial-A-Ride service hours and/or days to the 1993-94 budget process. 5. WIL-MAR DISPOSAL AUDIT Mark Joseph introduced Carlos Reynoso, CPA, who completed the financial review of Wil-Mar Disposal Company, Inc.. Mr. Reynoso provided an overview of his findings and recommendations. CC 04/13192 Page 10 • Public Comments: Betty Sanders, attorney for Wil-Mar, urged the Council to direct staff to come back with an ordinance that would place upon the property tax rolls (delinquent refuse collection charges. Ms. Sanders pointed out that residents who have applied for exemption to mandatory garbage collection must file annually. Councilwoman Borgeson noted that the public needs to be advised of this responsibility. Councilman Luna suggested that this could be done easily by computer. ---End of Public Testimony--- By mutual consent, the Council directed staff to prepare and bring back a draft ordinance providing authority for placing delinquent refuse collection accounts on the property tax rolls. In addition, staff was asked to address Mr. Reynoso's suggestion for replacing recycling coupons with payment dividends. E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION: 1. City Treasurer Micki Korba announced that she would be attending the Annual City Treasurers' Conference in Dana Point during the week of April 20 through 23,. 2. City Manager Andy Takata mentioned that staff would come back with suggested dates for a joint meeting with Paso Robles City Council regarding economic development and resource sharing. In addition, he announced that long-time resident Miles 'Wemp had passed away and to honor him, Recreation Department staff would erect a sign in his memory at Paloma Creek Park. THE MEETING WAS ADJOURNED AT 11:15 P.M. THE NEXT ;MEETING OF THE ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL WILL BE TUESDAY, APRIL 27, 1993 AT 7:00 P.M. MINUTES RECORDED AND PREPARED BY: LEE RABOIN, City Clerk Attachments: Exhibit A - (McNeil) Exhibit C - (Torgerson) Exhibit B - (DeMoraiis) CC 04/13/92 41 Page 11 CC4/13/93 EXHIBIT A Io U C, ro City Council from Dorothy T CISe1 h-oril 13 , 1993 regarding the median. u „� I am certainly not a specialist on medians, .lo gh I have driver_ streets in many cities which have them. 'her. I stay in a motel in Santa Barbara on S)tate :street , I really have not found it to be an 4nconvenienee to turn ri:-ht , drive a block or two in order to turn left to find the shop or restaurent I want to visit . ,U.' It is understandable that business owners on El Camino fear that neon^" e trill not come to them unless shoppers can turn left in the mio.dle of every and any block at any time . But as a city grows the way ztascadero has in the last two decades, business owners and shoppers find the main business street has become far too active to alloy= constant left turns--or to allow: fork lifts to carry lumber or other items back and forth across the busiest street it town. :post business people %•,,a.nt to see the town Trow for obvious reasons . Tr I o-wnea a lumber -ard or a furniture store or restaurant--or 1 1 be happy about the growtub which ?-as uoubled our ^onulat on in two decades. But I t'�ink I ��ro -ld recognize that . such ---owth ma;; mean that for the safety- and � elfare of my tovnrn, a.ad �; or its aesthetic improvement, a ,;:edian doTn the center of te crlly mayor traffic anter;;, is desirable and necessary . - id - t ri k 1 would recognize that the world-wide recession has fOrCc.. o:Hr city to count every dollar. Spending, one cent to remove the me-dian would be irresponsible and shammeful . If the first :portion of the median is im-erfecuse that know- ledge to make improvements s.Then the city has the a one;y to extend the median on El� Camino. I think the median is here to stay, and I welcome it. CC4/13/93 EXHIBIT B Page 1 I: KAYO-11Z, CITY COUNCIL, 1ESZD�E::�TTLFOR AGrl:%_ ST THE MY :`TAME IS JON DE MORALES, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF ATASCAD^RO STATE HOSPITAL. THERE HAS BEEN CONSIDERABLE CONTROVERSY OVER THE RAISED MEDIAN AND MISINFORMATION REPORTED REGARDING THE ROLE, INFLUENCE, AND POSITION OF THE STATE HOSPITAL IN THIS i MATTER. IN ORDER TO SET THE RECORD STRAIGHT, Z THINK IT 'ITECESSARY TO inLA.P,IFY THAT ATASCADERO STATE HOSPITAL TURN T s tL+C .-u.it• - { AT THE HOSPITAL ENTRANCE TO REDUCE THE RISK OF LRAF IC ACCIDENTS. THE STATE PROVIDED FUNDS TO OFFSET THE COST OF THIS PROJECT TO THE CITY. THERE HAVE NOT BEEN ANY LAWSUITS FILED AGAINST THE HOSPITAL BY VICTIMS OF TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS AT THE HOSPITAL ENTRANCE AND THE HOSPITAL DID NOT REQUEST A RAISED MEDIAN. HOWEVER, THE RAISED MEDIAN FROM MUSSELMAN DRIVE EXTENDING SOUTH TO SAN DIEGO ROAD IS A DEF114ITE IMPROVEMENT OVER A 6 FLUSH MEDIAN, WHICH I AND HOSPITAL S'T'AFF WHOLEHEARTEDLY r SUPPORT. i CC4/13/93 EXHIBIT B Page 2 ATASCADERO STATE HOSPITAL EMPLOYS 1450 STAFF, MOST OF WHOM S s LIVE IN THIS COMMUNITY AND ALL OF WHOM NEGOTIATE THE HOSPITAL ENTRANCE TWO TO FOUR TIMES OR MORE EACH WORKING i DAY. i I HAVE NEGOTIATED THAT INTERSECTION SEVERAL TIMES EACH WORKING DAY FOR THIRTY-TWO YEARS. THERE IS NOTHING THAT WILL GET YOUR HEART STARTED. . .NOT EVEN A STRONG CUP Or COFFEE. . . LIKE THE SIGHT OF A TEN-YARD DUMP TRUCK IN YOUR REARVIEW MIRROR BARRELING DOWN ON YOU AT A HIGH RATE OF SPEED IN THE SAME LANE YOU OCCUPY AT A DEAD STOP WHILE WAITING FOR A BREAK IN TRAFFIC TO NEGOTIATE A LEFT TURN. THE RAISED YIEEDIAN AND TURN LANE AT THE HOSPITAL ENTRANCE HAS SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCED THE RISK OF ACCIDENTS AT THIS INTERSECTION. ' IT HAS BEEN SAID TrLkT VEHICLE SPEED HAS INCREASED SINCE THE INSTALLATION OF THE MEDIAN. I QUESTION THIS OBSERVATION IN THE ABSENCE OF A BASELINE STUDY ESTABLISHED PRIOR TO THE 3 INSTALLATION OF THE MEDIAN. I CAN TELL YOU FROM PERSONAL EXPERIENCE THAT M.:NY MOTORISTS E.AVE, AND CONTINUE, TO TRAVEL THIS STRETCH OF EL C MINO REAL AT EXCESSIVE SPEEDS. BELIEVE TH. T THE =i;STALLATION OF A TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT THE INTERSECTION GF EL CAMINO REAL AND THE HOSPITAL ENTRANCE WILL SIGNIFICANTLY REDUC-E RISK TO ANYONE TRAVELING THIS STRETCH OF EL C,,MTN0 REAL. CC4/13/93 EXHIBIT B Page 3 iN ORDER ':TO FAC1LITATE T E INSTALLkT ON OF A TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT THIS INTERSECTION, I HAVE AUTHORIZED A TRkFF7C STUDY AT NOEXPENSE' TO THE CITY. IF THE STUDY AND THE CITY SUPPORTS THE INSTALLATION OF A SIGNAL, I AM PREPARED TO P.ECOI-IMEND A1111EXATION OF THE HOSPITAL BY THE CITY TO DERIVE ADDITIONAL SALES TAX REVENUE -- ESTIMATED AT $60, 000 ANNU-%.LLY. IN ADDITION, I AM PREPARED TO RECOM3-i-END TITLE TR;UNS^ER AND/OR A LONGER TERM LEASE TO ENABLE THE CITY TO EXPAND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES AT PALOMA CREEK PARK AND THE RE-ROUTING OF H.ALCYCN ROAD TO REDUCE THE RISK OF A.CCIDENTmS 7NVOLVING HEIAVY EQUIPMENT NEGOTIATING ENTRANCE INTO VIEJO CAMINO_ I I DO NOT HAVE AN OFFICIAL INTEREST IN THE !NSTAT LATION OF A I RAISED MEDIAN ELSEWHERE IN THE CITY AS PROVIDED BY ^STI: GENERAL PLAN. HOWEVER, SPEARING AS A CONSUMER, ONE WIHO SPENDS A GREAT DEAL OF TIME IN ATASCADERO, TRAVELING EL CAMINO REAL, PATRONIZING RETAIL ESTABLISHMENTS AND PARTICIPATING IN COMMUNITY SERVICE PROJECTS, I THINK IT DEFINITELY ENHANCES THE' CITY'S APPEARANCE ANn ImPROVES TRAFFIC SAFETY. CONSIDERING THE IMPACT ON COMMERCIAL ACCESS TO RETAIL OUTLETS AND THE DIFFICULTY SENIOP. CITIZENS HAVE NEGOTIATING LEFT TURNS, PERHAPS ADJUSTMENTS THROUGH COMPROMISE AND A COMBINATION OF RAISED AND FLUSH MEDIANS MAY ACCOMMODATE OUR COLLECTIVE NEEDS. CC4/13/93 MOIBIT C Page 1 _ _alio Ro a .. C05-46-6-7S!8 City Council city di F.ascadero 0-100 Palma Atascadero, CH 93422 •P.e : Zoning ordinance Enforcement Dear Councilmembers : received a copy of the staff report and frankly, was not surprised at its conten-s . This report is a perfect example of _ brie's'. wall that I ' 've '-bbeen hitting When trying to work: with h;-:-- F.1ar,nIng Departure?' Ol= this issue . Mr Engen and Pir . Decamp ex-nl.ain -;n this repo- the procedures the city fo-llows when _ rOCaSS_nc a bu�_ding permn They a7 so address the two Examples I =eferred to in my l_-ter. What they fail to acknowledge or a::d_"eSs . s the fact that these procedures don ' t. seem to be enough avoid damage to private and public Waterways . They aISG fail L 0. IF,cntiol-: that they are not enforcing severa:i of the already e:.-sung zoning ord=nances . .G S ur.'.C10 -:S Tull .r.%f Cr -eks and ponds that are fi-iin C_.t lip with sediment at all accelerated rate because we are ignoring the C aU SC . 3 don' t thin},: a:lyone would waist to Knowingly ruin our waterways . But, by simply enforcing the already existing toning ordinances, the , edirientation rate in our creeks and pond_ Would drop dramatically. I would like to quickly review the portion of the zoning ordinance that pertains to these issues . I have marked the particular sentences that I feel are being overlooked by the ?1 arming Depart-lent and I would like you to review them. it St, on page 4-59 ( 9-4 . 1.421 , a-9 ) refers to When a grading permit inv^lves minor grading on Slopes less than 2" =9 Stat s , ";here required by the Building Official , protective ir,easures to be takei d:::ri'ng construction:, such as etc . " i think the first phrase "Where required by the EuildIng official" should b= remove:.". I iecl that. ;:�rotect-Lve measures or, construction moi:.zs houlL' take place if there is any possibility of damaging r:wig:ib�_ilg land or waterways . SEoo::d, on page 4-E0 ( 9-4 . 1412 , d-2 ) refers to r.`r ite.:is for ' t states, "A -graaillg permit may be iSStied Only where _i-e Plan--;.ng Director fir:t finds , where applicable that prcposeu _:radii g c:ill :ict _-exult -,n c2-osion, stream sedimentation, or Jt1:Cr' adv C_:SC 'off-site effects or hazards to 1=fe c'r property. " T'.li-= is nct currently beina enforced. CC4/13/93 EXHIBIT C M-- on - - --_ - -- ; 9-4 , 144 , b-: , refers , Grading a.1G.,..d and re ion. it stats_ "Where natural vegetation has been removef through grading in areas not affected by the landscaping requirements ents and that small not be occupied by structures. such areas __hall ne replanted as sit forth in this Subsection to prevent Erosion after construction activities are completed. " it goes on to say that "Topsoil removed from the surface in preparation for grading and construction shall be stored on or Dear the site and protected from erosion while grading operations are underway. " If you look down to paragraph wc , it states , "off- site Effects. : Grading operations shall be conducted to prevent Vamagi.ng Effects of erosion, sediment production and dust or, adjacent property, including public and private rights-of-way. r' This section needs to be enforced. Curth, on page 4-62 ( 9-4 . 145 a-1&2 ; refers to Sedimentation and Erosion Control . It states , "A Sedimentation and erosion Control plan is required when grading which may affect adjacent property o; private .. ig lts-cf-way which is proposed tc be Conducted or __ft in an unfinished state during the period from October 15 :rough April 15 . A sedimentation and erosion control plait is required ;when land disrurbance activities are conducted in geologically unstable areas , on slopes in excess of 30%, etc . " in this same section, Fb , gc & =d 'go on to explain what requirements are :involved in sedimentation and erosion control plan preparation and processing, plan check and inspection! . I think sedimentation and erosion control should be on the _ inspect _ s check list . This sections gives several examples of t'y'pes of control measures that are recommended and also states in = 'Iii order to prevent polluting sedimentation discharges , eroElon and sediment control devices shall be :installed as required by the City Engineer for all grading and filling . " This has not been done in =C-3 , it refers to final erosion measurES . it states . "Within .::o Gays after completion of grading,, reuuir ing a sedimentation and erosion control Mari, all surfaces disturbed by vegetation removal , grading. . . . etc . . . . shall be revegetated to control eroEion. I think this needs to be enforced but 1 also think that you should add to that section the requirement that the revegetation be watered until established. Also in section Ed-3 , it refers to the USDA Soil Conservation Service Bulletin 347 for further information about sedimentation aril erosion. . controls . I think since this booklet is referred to in the zoning ordinance, it should It given, along with a building application, to anyone applying for a building permit . Last but not least is drainage. on page 4-65 ( 9-4 . 148 ) states that Drainage : standards for the control of grading, and drainage~are intended to minimize harmful effects of storm water runoff and resulting inundation and erosion on proposed projects , d no protect otec`' neig.boring alit.. downstream properties from drainage prohlems resulting from new developments . Under ( 9- 4 . 149 9-_ i .n a) it states , "Drainage plans are IeC1liCa for a pio_ ect than involves land disturbance of more than One acre. The problem 1 ' m aware of here is that II:any of the requir';ed drainage CC4/13/93 EXHIBIT C _.,11 u. --- i1. E=mil:.. v4 ai1 Z .. L.a, _ r E- -he -he i.eta.. the i-y Is W.. ..i_. g .. _ �yi+ l.tr a _iC a r,SZ % i} Eris 1.S iit;i u:. _i15_t _.: uc_��tut _ t::ei. tie c�.y i1e�u� �c ra�-i�w �'r!e :?raiiiaa r�3_<� =i i C a: ce tiny .,.1=ii. _ _ l P. ti;at 11raIi.ingyou2-self to a of- LIc;pe I S ad=cii-z You could have property wi.t.r! an 0% slope t sat coti_u have a i'. _nafiE pl—oblem. Each property nee:.S to dE Li"i eC __ �� C�iri2? . -here _S a drainage problem, control h;:,se ordinances are not �Jo=it�j t Je n of ced -han they .S i1^L: �'i bE _I_,a r,c i e. Ti:ere «. i1d reason to keE-� them on the books if the __,_y is not tdllow�i,y them. wou1e �.i_k_-' t-c, add'-Ir s - �a�:�t�:1ng tha` was saic at the � ast �i�y Cdunc=lirieet1na In e::t2ace z one o: the bu1dirtt sites I had E e'_"rEC tC =e "gzrabb_-a" Was used. __ was E%p1aineG' that _ ..:b ung �.. SC - ung hE, weeds -f:_' t:__ Siil'�ace 3u.t _7.u% ' ..___ ... �... u'_i,::.t%..�! ? �..- the �Ci._.i_! �}'a ii .i: F' a.�l 1tS 1C 'd i.t_..'it ary IS ' o .. _tia;: .. an-c' St*umpS by !-hEroots . " __ 1� s�tincts __ aomethlna _-__. cdu_a .,a s e En].=c--a ,enta_ Jiripati tti ii C :`Wi?ctrEair, prc.7pE:t1E5 ­_c'_:io . cont_ol :re not recru_z e�,:. _r r: a W2. a 1 di• EL _L Z ti EBE . UCC,ESt ions i'e sTsci: e .:.rt L.- _.v.TIituii=t�'" t e='ei:OpiZYEi'__ moi_ -ctor ._ 1E �y Ma::a1=- to nc*. Z, `a« and �11r City -1 CT Ec. i Z these, ordzancEc . 1?lcercly, _Elle c.,raers.Dn REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL Meeting Date: 5-11-93 CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item: B-2 Through: Ray Windsor, City Manager Via: Henry Engen, Director of Community Development From: Valerie Humphrey, Engineering Division SUBJECT• No Parking areas - South E1 Camino Real RECOMMENDATION: Approve attached Resolution No. 35-93 providing red curbs along South El Camino Real as recommended by North Coast Engineering. BACKGROUND• At the City Council meeting of April 13, 1993 North Coast Engineering presented a report to Council recommending various alterations to the El Camino Real median project. Council agreed to increase the length of the no parking zones at u-turn locations. Adoption of the attached resolution is required to make this modification. FISCAL IMPACT: Cost of the recommended modification is approximately $1500. 00 . Attachments: Resolution No. 35-93 w/attachments 000001 RESOLUTION NO. 35-93 RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO DESIGNATING NO PARKING ZONES ON EL CAMINO REAL AT THE U-TURN LOCATIONS AT THE RAISED MEDIAN .. WHEREAS, Section 4-2 . 1101, et. seq. , of the Atascadero Municipal Code allows the City Traffic Engineer to designate "No Parking" areas, and to place and maintain appropriate signs or markings indicating the same; and WHEREAS, Staff has studied the traffic patterns at this location and has determined that establishing No Parking areas at the u-turn locations as shown on attached Exhibit A will provide a greater turning area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Atascadero directs the City Traffic Engineer to place and maintain appropriate signs or markings as indicated above. On motion by ,and seconded by , the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ADOPTED: ATTEST: CITY OF ATASCADERO By LEE RABOIN, City Clerk ROBERT P. NIMMO, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: ARTHER MONTANDON City Attorney APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: HENRY ENGEN Director of Community Development 000002 1 I 1 I , I 1 I 1 ' I I 1 1 j I O C) L I 1 O + � Z SqN RgFqI ROAD O HOSPITAL nn� ENTRANCE i L� I m o Lo w I z I I Q i I � I NO PARKING "RED CURB" AT SAN RAFAEL AND HOSPITAL ENTRANCE 000003 C� I EXIST. CURS —=1 0 i � o 1 Q JORNADA - - 8±10_ - - - - - - - I DRIVEWAY I Q — — — — — — — � � o LANE o O - ' I 1 I : s NO PARKING "RED CURB.. i AT JORNADA LANE 000004 I REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL Meeting Date: 5-11-93 CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item: B-3 (A,B) Through: Ray Windsor, City Manager Via: Henry Engen, Director of Community Development From: Valerie Humphrey, Engineering Division ' SUBJECT• Notice of Completion - San Andres Bridge Graves Creek Bridge RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Council approve the attached Notice of Completion documents for the San Andres Bridge and the Graves Creek Bridge. BACKGROUND• Both projects received final inspections and were certified as complete by the project engineer on April 30th. We are required to file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder to allow for the filing of Mechanic's Liens prior to release of a 10% retention. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no additional cost to the project associated with the filing of this document. Attachment: Notice of Completion - San Andres Bridge Notice of Completion - Graves Creek Bridge 0 RECORDING REQUESTED BY: (and when recorded, mail to:) City Clerk CITY OF ATASCADERO 6500 Palma Avenue Atascadero, CA 93422 NOTICE OF COMPLETION NO TRANSFER OF PROPERTY Notice is hereby given pursuant to Civil Code Section 3093: 1 . The undersigned is corporate officer for the City of Atascadero, owner of property hereinafter described. 2. The full name of the owner is the City of Atascadero. 3. The full address of the owner is: 6500 Palma Avenue, Atascadero, CA 93422 4. The nature of the interest of the owner is in fee. 5. A work of improvement on the property hereinafter described was completed on April 30, 1993. 6. The work done was replacement of San Andres Avenue Bridge 7. The name of the contractor who performed such work of improvement was R. Burke Corporation. The date contract was entered into was September 17, 1992. 8. The property on which said work of improvement was completed was in the City of Atascadero, County of San Luis Obispo, State of California, and is described as follows: replacement of San Andres Bridge. 9. The street address of said property is: N/A Dated: May 5, 1993 RAY WINDSOR, City Manager City of Atascadero VERIFICATION I, the undersigned, say that I am the City Manager, declarant of the foregoing Notice of Completion; I have read said Notice of Completion and know the contents thereof; the same is true of my own knowledge. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on at the City of Atascadero, California. RAY WINDSOR, City Manager City of Atascadero RECORDING REQUESTED BY: (and when recorded, mail to:) City Clerk CITY OF ATASCADERO 6500 Palma Avenue Atascadero, CA 93422 NOTICE OF COMPLETION NO TRANSFER OF PROPERTY Notice is hereby given pursuant to Civil Code Section 3093: 1 . The undersigned is corporate officer for the City of Atascadero, owner of property hereinafter described. 2. The full name of the owner is the City of Atascadero. 3. The full address of the owner is: 6500 Palma Avenue, Atascadero, CA 93422 4. The nature of the interest of the owner is in fee. 5. A work of improvement on the property hereinafter described was completed on April 30, 1993. 6. The work done was replacement of Graves Creek Bridge. 7. The name of the contractor who performed such work of improvement was 0 Whitaker Engineering Contractors, Inc.. The date contract was entered into was August 25, 1992. 8. The property on which said work of improvement was completed was in the City of Atascadero, County of San Luis Obispo, State of California, and is described as follows: replacement of Graves Creek Bridge. 9. The street address of said property is: NIA Dated: May 5, 1993 RAY WINDSOR, City Manager City of Atascadero VERIFICATION I, the undersigned, say that I am the City Manager, declarant of the foregoing Notice of Completion; I have read said Notice of Completion and know the contents thereof; the same is true of my own knowledge. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on at the City of Atascadero, California. RAY WINDSOR, City Manager City of Atascadero 00000'7 REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL Meeting Date: 5-11-93 . CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item: B-3(C) Through: Andy Takata, Assistant City Manager Via: Henry Engen, Director of Community Development From: ('1 teven J. Sylvester, City Engineer SUBIECT: Street Improvements of EI Camino Real. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Council accept the subject street, drainage and sewer improvements as complete, file the Notice of Completion and authorize release of the 10% retention, less $3,675.00, 35 days after the date of acceptance as complete. BACKGROUND: Staff has reviewed the completed projects and deemed them to be in substantial conformance with the plans and specifications approved by the City Council, except as noted below. DISCUSSION: Staff is recommending that $3,675.00 not be released. This represents the City's cost to remove and replace a defective sidewalk underdrain and related curb and gutter. The contractor has stated in a letter (copy attached) that he will not do this work. The contract documents allow the City to remedy the defective work and deduct the cost from monies due to the contractor. OPTIONS: Council may accept the project as complete and authorize release of the retention at this meeting. Council may defer action to a future meeting. FISCAL IMPACT: The original contract was awarded for $382,349.10. The final cost of the projects is $452,701 .24. The 10% retention less the $3,675.00 is $41,595.12. 000008 Council Report Street Improvements of EI Camino Real May 11, 1993 Page 2 Part of the street improvements were installed by the City under-contract to Atascadero State Hospital. Their payment of $150,000 to the City will reduce the cost to $302,701.24. Also, $17,742.70 for a section of sewer force main in EI Camino Real was added to this contract. This was done to minimize damage to the new improvements when the El Bordo Force main is constructed later this year. When this is appropriately deducted, the City's cost for the project, as originally contracted and with change orders is $284,958.54. ATTACHMENTS: Whitaker Engineering Contractors, Inc. letter dated 4-21-93. 9115254.ATA 000009 A P R — 2 1 — 9 3 W C D 1 ! 2 G W H I T A K E R C 0 N T R A C T 0 R S I N C P _ 0 1 W ITS Jill 'lost-it-brand fax transmittal memo 7671 No�pagea ► �•+ From ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS INC. �•• III I QP.O.BOX 910 22985 EL CAMINO REAL Co. O44 rt SANTA MARGARITA,CA 93453 oept. Phone N S/ (805)438-5751 FAX(805)438.5752 Fax � Fax North Coast Engineering 715 - 24th Street Paso Robles, CA 93446 Ph : ( 805) 239-3127 Fx: ( 805 ) 239-0758 Re : E1 Camino Real Street Improvements, Atascadero -Sidewalk drain and project close-out Gentlemen; In order to finalize this project without further delay or dispute we will not be performing the drain modification. Please prepare a final estimate based on the agreed upon figures and revisions and we will contest the credit taken ( $3675 . 00 ) for the drain modification at a later date . Please advise this office of any meeting scheduled with City officials as soon as possible; we will soon be filing a motion to compel arbitration . Sincerely, Whitaker Contractors Inc . S . Brett Whitaker File : Elcamino ( 72 ) 000010 I I(`. 8SSF7�R REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item: B-4 CITY OF ATASCADERO Meeting Date: 05-11-93 Through: Andy Takata, Assistant City Manager Via: Henry Engen, Community Development Director From: Steve Sylvester, City Engineer SUBIECT: City/Caltrans traffic signal and street light cost sharing agreement. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt attached Resolution 24-93 approving the "Agreement for Sharing Cost of State Highway Electrical Facilities with City of Atascadero". BACKGROUND: The City has historically shared the cost of maintenance and energy for traffic signal and . lighting facilities with the State Department of Transportation (Caltrans). This typically occurs where a lighting or signal facility is located on State Highway 41 at intersections with City streets. This arrangement was originally entered into by an agreement dated 1982 which covered the cost of the signals at various locations. On March 26, 1991, the City entered into a "Cooperative Agreement" with Caltrans which addressed the City's responsibilities for capital costs and maintenance/energy cost participation for new signal installations at Portola Rd., Curburil Ave., and Atascadero Ave. This agreement requires the City to share in the cost of maintenance and energy for these new installations. DISCUSSION: The new agreement would supersede the 1982 agreement, and would consolidate all shared facilities into the control of a single agreement. The agreement provides for the maintenance and energy cost sharing based on the number of City or State streets served by each installation. Staff has reviewed the cost sharing proposal and cost sharing percentages and find them to be accurate and consistent with past practice. FISCAL IMPACT: Additional traffic signal maintenance and energy costs will be incurred as specified in the agreement. 9110210.ATA 000011 RESOLUTION NO. 24-93 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO APPROVING THE "AGREEMENT FOR SHARING -COSTS OF STATE HIGHWAY ELECTRICAL FACILITIES WITH CITY OF ATASCADERO" WITH THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WHEREAS, the State Department of Transportation constructs, operates, and maintains traffic signal and lighting facilities on State highway facilities within the City limits; and WHEREAS, the City receives benefit from said facilities where City streets intersect State highway facilities; and WHEREAS, the City entered into the "Cooperative Agreement" with the State Department of Transportation on March 26, 1991, which obligates the City to share in the costs of maintenance and energy of said facilities; and THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Atascadero does resolve as follows : 1 . The Cost Sharing Agreement between the State of California and the City dated June 14 , 1982, is hereby rescinded. 2 . The "Agreement for Sharing Costs of State Highway Electrical Facilities with City of Atascadero" is approved_ On motion of on by Council . and seconded by Council the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety by the following roll call vote : AYES: NOES : ABSENT: ADOPTED: 000012 Resolution No, 24-93 Page 2 CITY OF ATASCADERO, ' CALIFORNIA by: ROBERT P. NIMMO, Mayor ATTEST: LEE DAYKA, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ARTHER MONTANDON, City Attorney PREPARED BY: STEVEN J. SYLVESTER, City Engineer 9110211.ATA 000013 STATE OF CALIFORNIA—BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY PETE WILSON, Governor DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION P.O. BOX 8114 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93403-8114 m" TELEPHONE: (805) 549-3111 TDD (805) 549-3259 !1 March 23 , 1993 C `t 05-Agreements Ray Windsor City Manager City of Atascadero 6500 Palma Avenue Atascadero, CA 93422 AGREEMENT FOR SHARING COST OF STATE HIGHWAY ELECTRICAL FACILITIES WITH CITY OF ATASCADERO Dear Mr. Windsor: Enclosed are an original and three of the above Agreement which as been revised to include the signals and lighting on State Route 41 at the following locations: 1. West Mall Operational 2 . Portola Under Construction 3 . Curbaril if " 0 4 . Atascadero Avenue The format has been changed and will supersede the existing Agreement dated June 29, 1982 . After execution by the authorized City officials, please return the original and two, attaching to each a copy of the authorizing resolution. A fully executed copy will be returned for your files. If I may be of further assistance, I can be reached at 549-3407. Sincerely, Marilyn M. Ross District Delegated Mtce. Agmts. Officer Attach 000014 AGREEMENT FOR SHARING COST OF STATE HIGHWAY ELECTRICAL FACILITIES WITH CITY OF ATASCADERO This AGREEMENT, made and executed in duplicate this day of , 19 , by and between the State of California acting by and through the Department of Transportation, hereinafter referred to as "STATE" and the CITY of ATASCADERO, hereinafter referred to as the "CITY" . W I T N E S S E T H AGREEMENT This AGREEMENT shall supersede any previous AGREEMENT and/or AMENDMENTS thereto for sharing State incurred costs in the CITY with the CITY. ELECTRICAL FACILITIES Electrical facilities include flashing beacons, traffic signals, traffic-signal system, safety lighting, and sign lighting on the State Highway System. The cost of operating and maintaining flashing beacons, traffic signals, traffic-signal systems, safety lighting, and sign lighting now in place at the intersection of any State Highway Route and any City Street shall be shared as shown in Exhibit "A" . 000015 BASIS FOR BILLING It is agreed that monthly billings for flashing beacons, traffic signals, and traffic-signal systems shall be based on actual intersection costs which are as follows: A. Maintenance 1. Labor including overhead assessment 2 . Other expenses a. Equipment b. Materials C. Miscellaneous expenses B. Electrical Energy It is agreed that monthly billings for safety lighting and sign lighting shall be based on calculated unit cost derived by averaging District-wide cost each month. Costs are as follows: A. Maintenance 1. Labor including overhead assessment 2 . Other Expenses a. Equipment b. Materials C. Miscellaneous Expenses B. Electrical Energy 2 000016 It is agreed that monthly billings for utility-owned and maintained lighting will be based on calculated unit costs derived from utility company billings. Exhibit "A" will be amended as necessary by written concurrence of both parties to reflect changes to the system. This Agreement shall become effective JANUARY 1 , 1993, and shall remain in full force and effect until amended or terminated. The Agreement as above may be amended or terminated at any time upon mutual consent of the parties thereto. This Agreement may also be terminated by either party upon thirty (30) days ' notice to the other party. 3 000017 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands and seals the day and year first above written. CITY OF ATASCADERO By Mayor City Clerk Approved as to form and STATE OF CALIFORNIA procedure: DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION JAMES W. VAN LOBEN SELS City Attorney Director of Transportation By By District Director of Transportation Date 4 000018 EXHIBIT "A" City of ATASCADERO Effective January 1, 1993 ELECTRICAL FACILITIES OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE COST DISTRIBUTION Billed and Maintained by the State E. Number/ Type of Cost Distribution Route Pole No. Location Facility Units State City SIGNALS 041 *EP14B Portola Traffic 1 50 50 Actuated it *EP15S Curbaril it 1 50 50 it *EP15R Atascadero " 1 50 50 Avenue it EP15Z Morro Road " 1 50 50 " EP16G West Mall " 1 66. 3 33 .3 FLASHERS NONE LIGHTS 041 *D1473 Portola 200W HPS 1 50 50 " *D1475 if if 1 50 50 " *F1509 Curbaril If 1 50 50 " *F1510 " if 1 50 50 " *F1512 " " 1 50 50 " *F1513 " " 1 50 50 " *H1555 Atascadero " 1 50 50 Avenue " *H1556 " " 1 50 50 " *H1558 " " 1 50 50 " *H1559 " " 1 50 50 " I1595 Morro Road " 1 50 50 " I1597 If " 1 50 50 " J1621 West Mall " 1 66. 3 33 .3 " J1623 if " 1 66. 3 33 .3 *UNDER CONSTRUCTION 5 000019 E. Number/ Type of Cost Distributio Route Pole No. Location Facility Units State Ci LIGHTS (CONTINUED) 101 E4400 West End 20OW HPS 1 50 50 Santa Rosa Road Overcrossing if E4401 It if 1 50 50 " I4582 Atascadero 69W 8 0 100* Ave. Pedestrian Undercrossing J4595 Traffic Way 20OW HPS 1 50 50 Undercrossing " J4596 if " 1 50 50 " J4597 if " 1 50 50 UTILITY OWNED BILLED BY THE STATE NONE *ENERGY CHARGES ONLY MAINTAINED BY CITY 6 000020 REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item: B-5 Through: Ray Windsor, Meeting Date: May 11, 1993 City Manager File Number: CDBG From: l� Doug Davidson, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Consideration of a Resolution of Intent to participate in the "urban county" strategy for the federal Community Development Block Grant program. RECOMMENDATION- Adopt Resolution No . 34-93 and direct staff to continue working with San Luis Obispo County and Cities in a cooperative CDBG program, with the understanding that any agreement with the County will include: 1 . The amount of CDBG funds that the County would "pass through" to each metro city would be at least equal to the amount each city would receive if it applied individually for funding; 2 . The metro cities would maintain flexibility and control over their own grant funds and program implementation; and 3 . The metro cities would receive their full block grant entitlement, including 20% for administrative costs, without any deduction for County administrative costs . Alternatives In the event Council should wish not to participate with the County there appears to be two alternatives : 1 . Direct staff to prepare an individual application and do not apply for a joint CDBG application with other cities or the County . 2 . Direct staff not to proceed with the CDBG application at this time . BACKGROUND: (See Attachment C for full background) In March of this year the City was notified (see Attachment B) that the cities of San Luis Obispo-Atascadero-Paso Robles were designated as a "Metropolitan Area" by the federalgovernment and 0:00021 are eligible to participate as "entitlement cities" in the CDBG program. The program, administered by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) , could provide approximately $1 . 2 million for the three metro cities ($207, 000 for Atascadero in 1993 program dollars) . The urban county approach would bring into the County an additional $1 . 3 million ($2 .5 million total) toward economic development and low/moderate income housing projects . Since November, 1992, staff has been meeting with representatives from the cities of San Luis Obispo and Paso Robles to determine the possible options and come up with a preferred recommendation to the respective City Councils . The urban county approach was unanimously supported for the following reasons : 1 . The County could receive over twice the total funding of the individual metro cities approach. 2 . The process is simplified with one Countywide grant application and one Comprehensive Housing Assistance Strategy (CHAS) , as opposed to one for each metro city. 3 . The Countywide agreement could foster greater cooperation between cities and the County in housing programs . 4 . The urban county approach still allows cities' flexibility in the use of CDBG funds through "cooperation agreements" which are recognized by HUD. 5 . The County has more experience in administering "pass- through" funding programs . 6 . The minimum participation time period is three years; the metro cities could apply independently at the end of that period if they desire . On April 13, 1993, city managers and staff from five of the seven incorporated cities met to discuss program objectives of the urban county approach. The representatives agreed that since the urban county strategy would more than double the Countywide CDBG funds, further financial guarantees should be explored to maximize benefits to the cities . These negotiations will continue during the summer months as the application is finalized for submittal to HUD . HUD must be notified of the preferred strategy by May 21st . Hearings will be held to gather public comment before scheduling the final cooperation agreements for Council and Board approvals in August or September . The CDBG application must be filed by , October 1, 1993 to ensure participation in 1994 . Attachments : Attachment A - Resolution 34-93 Attachment B - Letter to Mayor from HUD Attachment C Issue Paper CDBG program 000022 ATTACHMENT "A" RESOLUTION NO. 34-93 A RESOLUTION OF INTENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO TO ENTER INTO A COOPERATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO TO ESTABLISH JOINT PARTICIPATION IN A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM WHEREAS, the County of San Luis Obispo ( "County" ) , a political subdivision of the State of California, and the City of Atascadero ( "City" ) , a municipal corporation, desire to participate in the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program administered by the U. S Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) ; and WHEREAS, said program will promote the public health, safety and welfare by providing grant funds to be used by the City and County ( "parties" ) to improve housing opportunities for low- and moderate-income households, to encourage economic reinvestment, to improve community facilities and public services, and to provide other housing-related facilities or services; and WHEREAS, to qualify for CDBG funds under HUD eligibility guidelines, the County must have a population of at least 200, 000 persons; and WHEREAS, the City, as part of the federally designated "San Luis Obispo - Atascadero - Paso Robles Metropolitan Area" , wishes to defer its entitlement status to the County for the mutual benefit of both jurisdictions; and WHEREAS, HUD requires that the parties enter into a coopera- tion agreement to define their rights and obligations as a prerequisite of participation in the CDBG program; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City of Atascadero as follows : Section 1 . Intent to enter into Cooperation Agreement. Pursuant to Federal Regulations 24 CFR 570 .501(b) , et. seq. , the City Council hereby affirms its intention to defer its entitlement status and enter into a cooperation agreement with the County to enable joint participation in the Community Development Block Grant program U. S . Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) . Section 2 . City Administrative Officer authorized to act for City. The City' s Administrative Officer is hereby authorized to prepare, in cooperation with the County and other incorporated cities within the County, a cooperation agreement which meets Federal require- ments and identifies the mutual rights and responsibilities of the parties . Moreover, the City Administrative Officer is authorized 000023 Resolution No. 34-93 Page Two To prepare a Memorandum of Understanding which establishes adminis- trative procedures, performance standards, and grant funding levels for the County and participating cities. Section 3 . Publication. The City Clerk shall cause a summary copy of this resolution to be published once within ten (10) days after its adoption in the Atascadero News, a newspaper of general circulation, printed, pub- lished, and circulated in the City. A copy of the full text of this resolution shall be on file in the off-ice of the City Clerk and shall be available to any interested member of the public. On Motion by Councilman , and seconded by Council- man , the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ADOPTED: CITY OF ATASCADERO By: ROBERT P. NIMMO, Mayor ATTEST: LEE RABOIN, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ARTHER MONTANDON City Attorney APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: HENRY ENGEN Community Development Director 000024 ATTACHMIENT "B" Honorable Robert Nimmo Mayor City of Atascadero 6500 Palma Avenue Atascadero, CA 93422 Dear Mayor Nimmo: SUBJECT: Fiscal Year 1994 Potential Metropolitan Cities Community Development Block Grant (CDI{G) Program Your City has been identified as a new central city based on the definition for Metropolitan Areas from the Office of Management and Budget and the 1990 population counts from the Bureau of Census. Consequently, the City of Atascadero is eligible for entitlement status in FY 1994 . Based on a hypothetical FY 1993 grant computation, your community's entitlement grant would be approximately $207,000. The amount of the actual entitlement grant for FY 1994 would depend upon the appropriation by Congress, the number of entitlement communities, changes in census information and other factors that may affect computation of the grant amount as determined by the statutory formula. Each potential metropolitan city in San Luis Obispo County can choose one of two options: accept designation as a metropolitan city or defer designation as a metropolitan city in order to participate as a small city in an Urban County entity to be established by San Luis Obispo County. Under current guidelines, all three of the newly designated central cities (Atascadero, Paso Robles, San Luis Obispo) would have to defer designation as a metropolitan city in order for the County to meet the requireme:ts of Section 102 (a) (6 ) (P_) of the Housing Act of 1974 , as amended. San Luis Obispo County officials will also be notified of this designation of potential entitlement status for your community. You should advise HUD and the County, by no later than May 21 , 1993, of the option you have selected. 000025 Fiscal Year 1994 Potential Metropolitan Cities 2 City of Atascadero Prior to making your final determination we encourage you to discuss each option thoroughly with your staff and the staff of San Luis Obispo County. Please be aware that the independent , administration of a Community Development Block Grant Program requires considerable commitment of time and qualified staff resources in order to best serve the needs of your community and its low and moderate income persons. Our office intends to hold an orientation session on the rules and regulations governing the administration of the Community Development Block Grant Program for those cities that decide to pursue entitlement status. In the interim, enclosed is a list of geographical areas and the responsible HUD Program Manager who may be contacted for further information. A HUD Community Planning and Development Representative will be assigned at a later date to work with you and your staff. Very sincerely yours, Charles Ming Manager Enclosure cc: Ray Windsor, City Manager City of Atascadero Robert Hendricks, County Administrator County of San Luis Obispo 9.4CMD Lambert 000029 AARON LAMBERT CITY COUNTY (213) 251-7248 Hemet Riverside Palm Desert Riverside Temecula Riverside Hesperia San Bernardino Coronado San Diego Atascadero San Luis Obispo Paso Robles San Luis Obispo San Luis Obispo San Luis Obispo Larry Hoak Diamond Bar Los Angeles (213) 251-7269 Palmdale Los Angeles Rosemead Los Angeles Aurora Madrigal La Habra Orange (213) 251-7243 Mission Viejo Orange Tustin Orange Yorba Linda Orange 000021 ATTACHMENT ''C" tUIS BIS PO city Of SM INW s 990 Palm Street/Post Office Sex 6100 • San Luis Obispo. CA 93403-8100 March 29, 1993 Issue Paper CONUVIUNNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GR_k T PROGRAM For San Luis Obispo County and Cites Prepared by Jeff Hooka Associate Planner situation The cities of San Luis Obispo-Atascadero-Paso Robles have been jointly designated as a "Metropoiitan Area" by the Federal government. and are, for the first time, eligible to participate in the Community Development Block- Grant "Entitlement Cities" Program administered by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), starting in the 1994 program year. The program could annually provide up to about S1.2 million for the metro cities• or about S2.5 million countywide toward housing and economic development projects la zgeted -or lo,.:,- and :nnode-ate-inccm_— persons. T ,is issue paper introduces the program• and provides information to help_ decision niakers with strategic decisions regarding =d '-lo y -00, :apply '- r C_,.DBG funds -- decisions which may. involve the County and all incorporated cities within the County. Background metropoiitan cities and urban counties throughout the United States use CDBG funds to provide affordable housing. pay for infrastructure improvements, and to stimulate local economic de,'e'.opment, pah'icularly -or low- and moderate-income persons. Only those central cities which are pal-t of "metropolitan areas" of at least 50,000 persons, and "urban counties" of at least ,'00.000 pe-sons are eligible for the program. Once these population thresholds a.e :each d, ane city Or COtinty" is notified by HUD of its "entitlement status", and invited t0 apply for CDBG funding. The program is optional -- metro cities and urban counties can opt not to participate. 01 Due to its copulation and incoirne characteristics. California has been a major recipient of CDBG :unds. Congress allocates funds to each state based on a formula which uses population and income levels. In 1991 . California received about S3*?' million in block _grant `ands, allocated among l=i lZtrO C;tles and 16 i!rban Counties. E.^, ;filen'-^,t c:t:�S urP f�j\'PrSr' - iile�' range i;l sire :-om relatively small metro cities like Yuba City. to major cities like Los Angeles and San Francisco. Some are relatively affluent, like Palm Sprints, Palo Alto, and Newport Beach; others, like National Citv, Pomona, and Oakland have high concentrations of low-income households. ne C.,lv of sa,-) ­:s obisJc ;s comminea io induce the cisanleo in all of as services, orograms anC acilvilies. e:eccmmu.,ca::ans Device 'or .he Deaf (8051 000028 CDBG Program • Page 2 Up to now, San Luis Obispo County and incorporated cities have been eligible only for the "Small Cities" block grant program administered by the California Department of Housing and Community Development. The State's program differs in several ways, but the primary; difference is that it is a competitive program, whereas under HUD's CDBG program, jurisdictions are "entitled" to the funds if they meet program requirements. Although the Entitlement Cities program is new to San Luis Obispo, other cities in the Tri-Counties area have participated in the program for many years, including Ventura, Santa Barbara, Lompoc, Santa Maria, and Monterey. In 1993, funding for these cities was as follows: C tv 1993 CDBG Tundina Ventura S837.000 Santa Barbara 1,205,000 Lompoc 498,000 Santa Mara 1,041,000 Monterev 268,000 San Luis Obispo County's Sitz r ion In 1993. these are 19 urban counties pa,ticipating, and according to HUD staff, each has "cooperation agreements" with incorporated cities as joint participants in the CDBG program. San Luis Obispo County appears to be unique, however, in its "either/or" 'eligibility status due to its relatively low total population. In other words, either SLO County is entitled as a whole - - including incorporated cities and unincorporated areas; or only the three metro cities are entitled. The County's entitlement status depends on: 1) having at least one "metropolitan area" within its boundaries; and 2) having a population of at least 200,000 persons. Population figures for the County and ncomorated cities are listed below: Litt Population Arroyo Grande /4,568. Atascadero 23;403 �l Paso De Robles 2 0,15 8 Grover Beach 11:901 Morro Bay M36 Pismo Beach 7,690 San Luis Obispo 42:480 Total Incorporated 129,936 Total Unincorporated 91,966 County Total 221,902 000029 CDBG Program Page 3 Based on SLO County's latest Department of Finance population estimates, if one or more of the metro cities opts not to "defer" its entitlement, the County would not qualify as an "urban county", and therefore would not be eligible to participate in the CDBG program. Even if the metro cities agree to defer their entitlements to enable county participation, there must also be enough participation by the non-metro, incorporated cities of Arroyo Grande, Pismo Beach, Morro Bay and Grover Beach to maintain an urban county population served by the CDBG program of at least 100,000. Unlike San Luis Obispo. Atascadero, and Paso Robles, the non-metro cities are still eligible, and lime , ,e option io co1;�pete for the S:a:2's CDBG progra7 . acccrduiQ to ;-il✓D. the populations of cities which choose to participate in the State's program would be deducted from the urban county population; hence, cooperation among the incorporated cities is necessz;-v C urban county status. According to HUD, had the cities and/or County participated in the program in 1993, they would have been eligible for the following funding: Corn Estimated CDBG EundinQ (S) Atascader o ^07,000 Paso Robles 220.000 San Luis Obisoo (city) 791.000 Total 1,221,000 Alternative Strategy: Urban County 2, 81,000 Net funding difference 1.360.000 3v _ is ort:gig as an ;urban county. as opoosed to the metro ities applyin; for CDBG funds indlvldually, ,sore than twice the amount oI funding would flow into the County for housing and economic development projects. 1994 funding levels will depend on several factors. including: Congressional funding decisions for the 1994 program year; 1993 population and income figures for the County and cities; and the CDBG application strategy pursued. EH,ible Projects/Programs HUD's pr.r:iary for use of CDBG funds are: A. To benefit low- and moderate-income persons. B. To aid in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight. 000030 CDBG Program Page 4 C. To meet community development needs having a particular urgency. At least ?0 percent of the grantee's overall expenses must be used for activities that benefit low- and moderate-income persons. Grant funds can be used for a broad range of projects. f=ederal C' regulations change each program year; however based on a recent HUD publication, the following projects and programs are eligible for CDBG funding: ■ Land acquisition and disposition (write-down) for affordable housing. ■ Removal of urban blight. a Jo traimng programs. ■ Conversion of non-residential structures into permanent affordable housing. ■ Rehabilitation of existing housing. ■ Economic assistance for businesses. ■ job counseling and training. • Relocation assistance. • Removal of architectural barriers to handicapped persons. ■ Infrastructure improvements. • Expansion of existing shelters. ■ Improvement of slums or blighted areas. • •' Correction of serious, hazardous community conditions which wouldn't otherwise be possible due to financing or funding limitations. The grant can also be used for certain public services like child care, heaith care, education, public safety, housing counseling, senior citizens and homelesspersons, drug abuse counseling and treatment. and energy conservation counseling and testing, provided that such funding provides :tither a new or increased level of service, and the amount spent on such services does not exceed 15 percent of the annual CDBG grant plus 15 percent of program income from the previous year. lip to =0 oercent of the total grant funding may be used to cover the costs of overail program management, coordination, monitoring, and evaluation, inciuding: staff salaries, wages, and reiated costs: travel costs: legal, accounting, and audit services under 3rd party contracts; goods and services necessary to administer the program; public information services; and costs to prepare federal program applications. Activities generally not eligible for CDBG funds include: assistance buildings used for the general conduct of Ro%ernmeiit: general government expenses; political activities; purchase of constrUCtion 22up:i?C':... -epairing, operating and maintaining public facilities, liiiproveme.n.ts or seryices (exceot in connection with other eligible activities); income payments; new housing construction (except under special provisions). 000031 CDBG Program Page 5 f CDBG AppLicadorz Strategies After receiving notice of program eligibility, the metro cities must notify HUD of their intent to apply for CDBG funding individually, or to defer their entitlement status to SLb County and participate jointly with the County and other incorporated cities on or before May 21, 1993. On January 28, 1993 representatives from SLO County, incorporated cities, the SLO Housing Authority, People's Self-Help Housing Corporation and HUD met to discuss the CDBG program and application procedures. On March 9, i993, representatives from the metro cities met to discuss the CDBG application strategies. Four possible application strategies were L The "go it Wior.e" approach, in which each :retro city would apply for CDBG funding and would not defer entitlement to SLO County. 2. Partial deferral, in which San Luis Obispo and one other metro city defer their entitlement status to SLO County and the County then becomes an "urban county" for CDBG purposes with the third retro city probably eligible to apply for CDBG funding through HUD on its own. 3. The "urban co'lnty" strategy in which all retro cites defer entitlements to SLO . County pursuant to a cooperation agreement. 4. The "do nothing" strategy in which the metro cities would not apply individually for CDBG funding and would not defter their entitlement status to the County. According to HUD, "partial deferral" is not feasible because, 1994 program eligibility I.vill be based on the County and cities' 1990 census figures. Based on the County's 1990 population of 217,162 persons, the required minimum urban county population of 200,000 persons could not be maintained if any one of the three metro cities opt to "go it alone." There are pros and cons associated with each feasible strategy: Strategy 1 - Metro Cities Pros A) Would ensure independent, City Council control of rile CDBG program and funds. B) Could encourage greater local citizen participation and support. C) Would help develop local "grantsmanship" capacity at the city level. 000032 CDBG Program Page 6 D) Would afford somewhat greater status due to the direct HUD - city relationship. Cons A) For some cities, the amount of CDBG funding might not justify the staffing costs to apply for and administer the grants. B) Cities are generally less experienced than the County in dealing with direct federal entitlement programs, and may lack the in-house expertise. C) The total amount of funding received would be less than one-half that possible under the "urban county" approach. D) Could be perceived as "self-serving" or uncooperative by the public or by non- entitled jurisdictions. Strategy 2 - urban County Pros A) Entire county could receive uo to twice the funding received under strategy 1. B) Could simplify the application process since only one grant application and one Comprehensive Housing Assistance Strategy (CHAS) document would be required, rather than three. C) Could encourage greater cooperation between cities and the County in housing and economic development programs. D) Could still allow cities' flexibility in the use of CDBG funds through "cooperation agreements" which are recognized by HUD E) The County already has considerable experience with "pass-through" funding programs (health, safety, etc.). F) The minimum participation period is three years; however at the end of three years, the metro cities could apply for the program independently of the County. Cons A) The application process could become "bogged down" due to the additional agencies involved. 000033 CDBG Program Page 7 B) Cities may lose some flexibility and/or autonomy in the use of grant funds. C) The County could incur unreimbursed administrative costs if administrative expenses exceed 20 percent allowance under HUD rules. D) On a county-wide basis, the higher funding level may be perceived to be "growth- inducing" to the extent that it allows additional housing, economic development and infrastructure where it would otherwise not be possible. Strategy 3 - Do Nothing P rOS A) Could maintain maximum autonomy by cities and the County, since there would then be no federal leverage over community development programs. B) Could be perceived as the "slow" or "no-growth" alternative, since this approach would not stimulate additional housing or economic development in the County bevond levels otherwise possible or expected, and appeal to some community groups and indi,,°ideals. Cons A) No CDBG funds would be received, despite the cities' and County's worsening fiscal picture. B) Could be perceived as a lack of leadership or sensitivity to the housing needs of low- and moderate-income households. C) Would not promote regional cooperation in solving regional planning problems, ,:`e ;obsrhousing balance, homelessness, farmwoi er housing, and emergency housing. The Preferred Approach The consensus at the strategy meeting was that the "do nothing" strategy was not a desirable nor tenable strategy; :hat "pariial deferral" by one or t,.%-o metro cities was not a likely scenario; and that the "urban count;" strategy, a iiile potentially difficult, was the preferred strategy provided the cities had assurances that: 1. The amount of CDBG funds the County would "pass through" to each metro city would be at least equal to the funds each city would be eligible to receive if it applied separately 000034 CDBG Program Page 3 for CDBG funds; 2. The metro cities would maintain flexibility and control over their own grant funds and program implementation; and 3. The metro cities would receive their full block grant entitlement, including the 20% allowance for administrative costs, without any deduction for SLO County administrative costs. Where to From Here? Accordin; to HUD, such city/county funding relationships are commonly established under the program. For example, the City of Solana Beach, with a population of about 14,000 persons, has entered into a subrecipient relationship with the County of San Diego. Steve Apple, Community Development Director in Solana Beach, indicates that under a "cooperation agreement", the City has been able to build a new Senior Center with what amounted to an interest-free advance on the funds the City would have received over a three-year period, allowing significant Savings on construction and earlier use of the facility. The County is responsible fo r environmental clearances and HUD reporting; the City issued the request for proposals, administered the construction contract, and handled all planning and building approvals and inspections. Solana Beach has not experienced any problems in working with the County of San Diego in administering its block grant. To set the framework for joint city/county participation in the program, a "cooperation agreement" must be entered into by the participants. Such agreements define the roles, responsibilities and obiigations of the cities and county, and satisfy HUD's statutory requirements. aside from certain "boilerplate" HUD requirements, there is flexibility to modify the agreement wording to address specific needs or concerns. Staff has reviewed HUD-approved cooperation agreements from Solana Beach, City of Beaumont and Riverside County, and between 16 cities and San Bernadino County. Using these examples, staff has prepared a draft cooperation agreement and resolutions which could provide the framework to implement the CDBG program under the urban county strategy. The next steps in the process are likely to be: 1. Cay ^onagers meet o select the prefer-,ed application strategy (March 29th); -. Cities' Ind County staff meet to discuss the draft Cooperation Agreement and implementing resolutions (April 13th). 3. Establish joint city/county CDBG working group to prepare, or oversee the preparation s of: 000035 CDBG Program Page 9 A. The cooperation agreement, B. The CHAS and related application documents; and if necessary, C. A memorandum of understanding which sets out detailed administrative policies and procedures, remedies, and programs D. Verification by the County Counsel that the County of San Luis Obispo has the "powers to carry out essential housing and community development activities", based on standard HUD requirements. 4. Schedule the item for consideration by the city councils and the Board of Supervisors, possibly following a two-step hearing approach: A. Schedule a study session in mid-April to discuss the program in general, and to provide direction to staff on the preferred application strategy; and B. Schedule a public hearing in early to mid-May asking the metro city councils to consider adoption of a "resolution of intent." 5. Cities and/or County notify HUD in writing of intention to participate in CDBG individually or as part of an urban county by May 21, 1993. 5. Schedule hearings in June to hear public comments on housing needs and possible block -rant programs. 7. Finalize the CHAS, agreements, and application materials by July 1. 8. Schedule CHAS and cooperation agreement for city councils and Board approval in late Auzust or early September. 9. File the CDBG application materials by October 1, 1993 to be assured of participation in the program beginning in July 1994, and possibly as early as January 1994. )C Jt jL'L:afb:••.rac 000036 REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item: D-1 Through: Andy Takata, Assistant Meeting Date: 05/11/93 City Manager File -No, : Circulation ElementUpdate and EIR From: Henry Engen, Community Development Director �<< SUBJECT: Continued consideration of General Plan Update Final Draft Circu- lation Element and Final Environmental Impact Report (continued from 4/27/93 meeting) . RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the attached Resolution No. 23-93, adopting the up- dated Circulation Element with such amendments as the Council may direct. This action includes certifying the Final Environmental Impact Report as adequate. BACKGROUND: The Council ' s April 27th public hearing was held on the Planning Commission' s recommended Circulation Element. Following questions and public testimony, the meeting was closed to the public and continued to this meeting to make such revisions to the Final Draft Circulation Element as City Council desires . ISSUES• The following listing is provided to facilitate discussion and resolution of issues raised during the course of the April 27th public hearing: 1 . State Route 41 Alternatives . (Page III-10, 1st paragraph) A question was raised on language relative to be directing Route 41 traffic towards Paso Robles . 2 . Development Proposal Approvals . (Page III-22 ) ' The need for proposed paragraph (c) was questioned. 3 . El Camino Real Class III Bike Route. (Page III-28, Program 5 . 1 ) The desirability of having signed bike routes without striping on E1 Camino Real was challenged. 4 . Bike Route Requirements . (Page III-30, Programs 5 . 6 & 5 . 7 ) Concern was expressed as whether to require such improvements . 000037 5 . Palomar Avenue Walkway. (Page III-31, Figure III--7 ) The desirability of Palomar Avenue as a walkway was questioned in public testimony. 6. Salinas River Bridge - Two Lane Limitation. (Page III-33, Program 6 .2) Language calling for a MOU with Caltrans to -limit the width of the proposed bridge to two lanes was challenged. 7 . E1 Camino Real Median. (Page III-33, Program 6 .4) The issue here is whether to mandate in the General Plan that there be no landscape median on E1 Camino Real vs . the orig- inally proposed language enabling the median subject to working with affected business and property owners . 8 . Via Way Truck Route. (Page III-35, Program 6. 9) Concern was expressed over neighborhood impacts and the need for more study. 9 . Atascadero Creek Crossing. (Page III-39, Program 7 .7 ) Consider adding an Arizona-type crossing of Atascadero Creek between Morro Road and Carmelita (approximately midway between Cassanova and Barranco Road) . 10 . Ardilla Road Bridge. (Page III-39, Program 7 . 8) It was noted that the road extension would require a bridge which should be referenced in this sentence. 11 . Halcon Road Extension. (Page III-46, Table III-3, Item C-8) Extending Halcon Road as a replacement to Santa Barbara as a truck route to the freeway generated some negative comment. 12 . Atacadero to Templeton Arterial . (Page III-46, Table III-3, Item C-11 ) The possible growth-inducing effects of this proposal raised an issue. 13 . Entrada - 2way Traffic Proposal. Staff would note that this local street proposal could be handled as a referral to the BIA for evaluation. The Traffic Committee was concerned with the possible loss of parking and the adverse effect of left turns onto El Camino Real . S/C: General Plan Update Program Final Draft Circulation Element - DKS Associates: April 9, 1993 Final Environmental Impact Report Draft Circulation Element - Denise Duffy & Associates: February 1993 Staff Report to City Council: April 27 , 1993 Encl : Resolution No. 23-93 cc: Michael Kennedy, DKS Associates Michael Multari, Crawford, Multari & Starr 000038 RESOLUTION NO. 23-93 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO APPROVING THE ADOPTION OF AN UPDATEDCIRCULATION ELEMENT OF THE CITY' S GENERAL PLAN (CITY OF ATASCADERO) WHEREAS, the City of Atascadero has grown considerably since incorporation; and WHEREAS, the City' s General Plan, which was prepared in the 1970 ' s and adopted in 1980 to guide the City' s general growth is in need of updating; and WHEREAS, the City has undertaken a comprehensive program of study and public participation to update the General Plan beginning in 1986; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero conducted public hearings on the subject amendment on December 15, 1992 , March 2 , 1993, March 16, 1993 and April 6, 1993; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65356 provides that a General Plan be amended by the adoption of a resolution; and WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Atascadero finds as follows : 1 . The proposed General Plan amendment recommended by the Planning Commission reflects policies and standards appro- priate for the City of Atascadero. 2 . The Environmental Impact Report prepared for the project is hereby certified as a complete and accurate document consis- tent with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) . THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Atascadero does resolve to approve the General Plan Update as follows: 1 . Amendment to the General Plan text by adoption of the Circu- lation Element, dated April 9, 1993 (Attachment A) . 2 . Rescinds the following chapter of the 1980 General Plan: VIII Circulation Element (Chapter III of Updated General Plan) . 3 . Incorporates the following additional material by reference into the Technical Appendix: Circulation Element Technical Report, DKS, October 1992 . 000039 Resolution No. 23-93 Page 2 On motion by Council and seconded by Council , the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ADOPTED: CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA by: ROBERT P. NIMMO, Mayor ATTEST: LEE DAYKA, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ARTHER MONTANDON, City Attorney PREPARED BY: HENRY ENGEN Community Development Director 000040 434,, REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item: D-2 CITY OF ATASCADERO Meeting Date: 05-11-93 Through: Ray Windsor, City Manager Via: Nkf% Henry Engen, Community Development Director From: WSteve Sylvester, City Engineer SUBIECT: Atascadero Street Improvement Project No. 1992 (3-F Meadows, Tecorida and Las Encinas Assessment Districts) - INFORMATIONAL MEETING. RECOMMENDATION: Review project construction scope, cost estimates, and schedule. Receive public input. Review revised assessments. BACKGROUND: At your meeting of April 27, 1993, Council approved the Preliminary Engineer's Report for the Atascadero Street Improvement Project No. 1992, and set May 11, 1993, as the first of two public hearings required for implementation of the Assessment Districts. The May 11th meeting is an information meeting established to review details of project cost, assessment amounts, and schedule. The protest hearing has been scheduled for June 22, 1993, at which time a final determination will be made for lapproval of the Districts. DISCUSSION: Staff has reviewed administrative costs and incidental bond costs with Bond Council and the Assessment Engineer. Bond Council has provided revised cost information for incidental bond costs. The City administrative costs have been reviewed and reduced. A revised project cost has been issued for each project, which has yielded a significant reduction in the per parcel assessments. This information has been compiled in a revised preliminary engineer's report which is on file with the City Clerk. In accordance with the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913, a "Notice to Property Owners" has been mailed to all effected lot owners. Copies of the Notice are attached to this report. The report indicates the preliminary assessment amounts and the proposed revised assessment amounts, which require Council approval. It is anticipated that final Council approval would be done by resolution at the June 22, 1993, protest hearing. 000041 Council Report Atascadero Street Improvement Project No. 1992 May 11, 1993 Page 2 FISCAL IMPACT: Staff administrative costs and direct contract costs expended prior to the protest hearing will be incurred as previously directed by Council. Assessment engineering costs prior to the protest hearing will be funded by the City with reimbursement from the Assessment District if a majority protest does not occur. After the protest hearing, administrative staff costs would be absorbed by the City, while all other direct contract administrative costs and other District costs would be funded by the Assessment District. 9310708.ATA 000042 NOTICE TO PROPERTY OWNERS CITY OF ATASCADERO STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1992 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council (herein "Council") of the City of Atascadero (herein "City"), California, on December 8, 1992, adopted a Resolution of Intention No. 131-92 (herein "Resolution of Intention"), to undertake the acquisitions and improvements as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference (herein "Project"). The Resolution of Intention authorized the undertaking of assessment proceedings pursuant to the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913, stated the Council's intention that if bonds are issued they are to be issued upon the unpaid assessments pursuant to the Improvement Bond Act of 1915, bonds are to mature over a period of not to exceed thirty- nine (39)years from the second (2nd) day of September next succeeding twelve (12) months from their date, and are to bear interest at a rate of not to exceed twelve percent (12%) per annum. Final bond terms will be determined according to market conditions at the time bonds are sold,although presently it is expected that bonds will mature over a period ranging between 15 to 20 years and bear interest at a rate of approximately seven percent (7%). Pursuant to the Resolution of Intention, a preliminary engineer's report (herein "Report") consisting of schematic plans and specifications, the cost of any land acquisitions, maps and descriptions, an estimate of costs and expenses, and a diagram and an assessment has been prepared by the Assessment Engineer and filed with the City Clerk (herein "Clerk") and is available for public inspection in the Clerk's office. The estimated total cost of the Project, as shown in the Report, has been allocated according to benefit among all the property within the City of Atascadero Street Improvement Project No. 1992 (the "Assessment District"). Your particular assessment can be determined by referring to Exhibit "B" attached hereto. The amount of assessment against your property, as shown in the Report and in Exhibit ,B", can not be increased; however, you are encouraged to review the Report in its entirety prior to each of the public hearings. Upon review of the Report you will notice that the estimated total cost of the Project is comprised partly of certain incidental costs necessary to accomplish the issuance of municipal bonds. Some of the incidental costs are self-explanatory, others are not. For example, the cost identified as the Reserve Fund is not really a true "cost" due to the fact that it is invested and held by a bank, acting as trustee on behalf of each of the property owners, the bondholders and the City. If you are never delinquent on a bond payment, or alternatively, if you prepay your assessment, you are entitled to a rebate of your respective share of the Reserve Fund upon the earlier of (1) the expiration of the last maturity of bonds, or (2) the prepayment of assessment. Further, the interest earned by the Reserve Fund is used to reduce your yearly payments on the bonds. For further details on all costs of the Project, please refer to the contact person and number at the end of this Notice. 1 000043 PLEASE BE ADVISED that because of the need to minimize costs, the Report is being revised to eliminate the incidental cost shown in the Report as "Capitalized Interest". Capitalized Interest was initially identified in the Report for _purposes of prepaying the first year's interest payment on the bonds. Capitalized Interest was eliminated due to the need to minimize costs, and because it is expected that bonds are capable of being issued prior to August 1, 1993, (which is the deadline for the County Auditor-Controller to amend tax rolls to reflect property owner assessment bond payments coming due). The downside of eliminating Capitalized Interest becomes a factor only if the August 1, 1993 deadline is missed for an y reason (and no assurance can be given that said deadline will be met). In such a case the bonds will continue to accrue interest, but you would not get a bill for such interest until October or November of 1994 (because the earliest the Auditor-Controller could get your assessment payment on the tax roll would be August 1, 1994). Because tax rolls are structured to anticipate the principal and interest due on the bonds for each upcoming fiscal year, your first tax bill, if the August 1, 1993 date was missed, would reflect the accrued interest for 1993 as well as the anticipated principal and interest for 1994. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that Tuesday, the 11th day of May, 1993, at the hour of 7:00 o'clock p.m. of said day, in the meeting place of said Council, located at the Council Chambers, City Hall, 6500 Palma Avenue, Atascadero, California, are the time and place appointed when and where public testimony will be invited regarding the City of Atascadero Street Improvement Project No. 1992 (the "Assessment District") or the particulars of the Report (herein "Informational Hearing"). NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that Tuesday, the 22nd day of June, 1993, at the hour of 7:00 o'clock p.m., in the regular meeting place of said Council at the Council Chambers, City Hall, 6500 Palma Avenue, Atascadero, California, are the time and place fixed by said Council when and where the Council will consider and finally determine whether the public interest and convenience require said acquisitions and improvements, and when and where it will consider and finally act upon the Report, and when and where it will hear all protests in relation to said proposed acquisitions and improvements, or to the estimate of the costs and expenses thereof set forth in the Report, or to the grades at which said work will be done, or the extent of the Assessment District, or the plans and specifications, or the proposed diagram or assessment, or to the maps and descriptions, and that any person interested may file a written protest with the Clerk not later than 7:00 o 'clock p.m., on June 22, 1993 (herein "Protest Hearing"). NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that any written protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property in which each signer of the protest is interested, and, if the signers are not shown on the last equalized assessment roll as the owners of the property, the protest shall contain or be accompanied by written evidence that the signers are the owners of the property. A suggested form of protest is contained in Section 10310 of the California Streets and Highways Code. Any written or oral protest not made at the time and in the manner provided above shall be deemed to be waived voluntarily by any person who might have made such protest and such person shall be deemed to have consented to the proposed improvement, the extent of the Assessment District, the 2 000044 proposed assessment and any other act, determination, or proceeding on which protest could be made. If the protest is against the Report or the project and the Council finds that the protest is made by the owners of more than one-half of the area of the land to be assessed for the improvements, and protests are not withdrawn so as to reduce the protests to less than a majority, no further proceedings shall be taken for a period of one year from the date of the decision of the Council on the protest hearing. Any person making a protest may withdraw the protest, in writing, at any time prior to the conclusion of the protest hearing. The Council may confirm, modify, or correct the proposed assessment. It should be noted that the Council always has the option to abandon the proceedings even if a majority protest does not occur. If the Council overrules the protest after the June 22, 1993 Protest Hearing, each property owner listed in Exhibit "B" will be given the option to pay their respective assessment in cash within 30 days. If you decide to prepay your assessment in whole or in part during said 30 day period, you will be entitled to a five to seven percent (5% - 7%) discount to be taken at the time of prepayment. YOUR ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT IS AS FOLLOWS: Assessment Assessor's Preliminary* Revised** Property Owner Number Parcel No. Assessment Assessment SEE EXHIBIT 11311 ATTACHED HERETO * Preliminary Assessment is the assessment amount shown in the Preliminary Report dated April, 1993. ** Revised Assessment is the revised assessment amount shown in the revised Preliminary Report dated April 30, 1993. Please Note that the revised assessment amount will not become effective unless the Council approves the same at or after the May 11, 1993 City Council meeting. DATED: April 28, 1993. /s/ Lee Raboin City Clerk City of Atascadero FOR FURTHER INFORMATION please call or write to: The office of the City Engineer, 6500 Palma Avenue, Atascadero, California 93422. Telephone: (805)461-5020. s 3 000045 EXHIBIT "A" DESCRIPTION OF WORK CITY OF ATASCADERO STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1992 AREA NO. 1 (3-F Meadows) The following is a general description of work and improvements within the proposed City of Atascadero Street Improvement Project No. 1992. A. The placement of asphalt concrete paving and paving fabric. B. Roadway excavation, placement of roadway embankments and shoulder grading. C. Placement of asphalt concrete dikes. D. Installation of storm drainage inlets, pipelines and appurtenances. E. Installation of survey monuments and adjustment of water valves. F. Clearing, grubbing, traffic control and mobilization. G. The acquisition of all land and easements and all of the work and expenses auxiliary to any of the above. 000046 0 DESCRIPTION OF WORK CITY OF ATASCADERO STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1992 AREA NO. 2 (Tecorida) The following is a general description of work and improvements within the proposed City of Atascadero Street Improvement Project No. 1992. A. Placement of roadway embankment and roadway excavation. B. Placement of aggregate base and asphalt concrete paving. C. Installation of storm drainage lines and appurtenances. D. Adjustment of water valves, manholes and fire hydrants to grade. E. Construction of drive approaches and transitions. F. Installation of street signs and survey monuments. G. Clearing, grubbing, traffic control and mobilization. H. The acquisition of all land and easements and all of the work and expenses auxiliary to any of the above. 000047 DESCRIPTION OF WORK CITY OF ATASCADERO STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO.1992 AREA NO. 3 (Las Encinas) The following is a general description of work and improvements within the proposed City of Atascadero Street Improvement Project No. 1992. A. Placement of asphalt concrete paving and paving fabric. B. Grading of existing roadway shoulders and roadway excavation. C. Adjustment of water valves and installation of survey monuments. D. Clearing, grubbing, traffic control and mobilization. E. The acquisition of all land and easements and all of the work and expenses auxiliary to any of the above. 000048 EXHIBIT "B LIST OF PROPERTY OWNERS Name of Diagram Assessor's Preliminary Revised Owner Assmnt No. Parcel No. Assmnt Assmnt Area No. 1, 3-F Meadows P. & S. Van Benthuysen 1 055-102-007 $ 6,154.22 $5,716.32 8520 Casanova Road Atascadero, CA 93422 Harlan & B.R. Hallett 2 055-102-011 -0- -0- 8325 Sierra Vista Atascadero, CA 93422 John Vesnaver 3 055-102-003 6,965.32 5,716.32 8550 Casanova Road Atascadero, CA 93422 Hector & Elena Castro 4 055-102-002 6,965.32 5,716.32 eCasanova Road cadero, CA 93422 M.J. & A.L. Emrich 5 055-102-001 6,965.32 5,716.32 8580 Casanova Road Atascadero, CA 93422 Matthew & C.A. Dilullo 6 055-083-004 6,965.32 5,716.32 8610 Casanova Road Atascadero, CA 93422 Thomas J. Hansen 7 055-083-005 6,965.32 5,716.32 8620 Casanova Road Atascadero, CA 93422 Mildred G. England 8 055-082-005 6,965.32 5,716.32 8660 Casanova Road Atascadero, CA 93422 C.D. & K.H. Wyckoff 9 055-082-008 6,965.32 5,716.32 8670 Casanova Road Atascadero, CA 93422 000049 Name of Diagram Assessor's Preliminary Revised in Owner Assmnt No. Parcel No. Assmnt Assmnt MF Douglas & Jeanne Brown 10 055-082-007 $ 6,965.32 $5,716.32 10075 Andrita Road Atascadero, CA 93422 11 NOT USED David.& Linnea Glover 12 055-082-001 6,965.32 5,716.32 8700 Casanova Road Atascadero, CA 93422 United Airlines Employees 13 055-072-006 6,965.32 5,716.32 P.O. Box 66100 Chicago, ILL 60666 Donald D. Rossi 14 055-072-002 6,965.32 5,716.32 8730 Casanova Road Atascadero, CA 93422 John T. & Diane Nisbet 15 055-072-005 6,965.32 5,716.32 10835 Portal Road Atascadero, CA 93422 16 NOT USED Michael D. McGranahan 17 054-321-008 6,965.32 5,716.32 5655 Silverado Place Paso Robles, CA 93446 C.A. & J.F. Bove 18 054-321-011 6,965.32 5,716.32 10080 Andrita Road Atascadero, CA 93422 A.M. & A.L.-Waterbury 19 055-073-002 6,965.32 5,716.32 10090 Andrita Road Atascadero, CA 93422 Warren & Jane Hooper 20 055-071-015 6,965.32 5,716.32 8795 Cassanova Road Atascadero, CA 93422 Joseph & Jean Kuntze 21 055-071-014 6,965.32 5,716.32 8775 Casanova Road Atascadero, CA 93422 000050 e of Diagram Assessor's Preliminary Revised ner Assmnt No. Parcel No. Assmnt Assmnt Alex O. Taylor 22 055-071-001 $ 6,965.32 $5,716.32 8765 Casanova Road Atascadero, CA 93422 Charles & Ardena Braff 23 055-081-004 6,965.32 5,716.32 8735 Casanova Road Atascadero, CA 93422 Centra Coast Neuro- 24 055-081-001 6,965.32 5,716.32 behavior Center P.O. Box 877 Morro Bay, CA 93442 Roy D. Giffith 25 055-081-002 6,965.32 5,716.32 9190 Barranca Road Atascadero, CA 93442 John L. Cotsenmoyer 26 055-081-010 6,965.32 5,716.32 8705 Casanova Road Atascadero, CA 93422 f871 & Gunhild Buhl 27 055-081-012 6,965.32 5,716.32 Casanova Road Atascadero, CA 93422 Paul & Gunhild Buhl 28 055-081-011 6,965.32 5,716.32 8687 Casanova Road Atascadero, CA 93422 Marcel & Helen Texeira 29 055-081-006 6,965.32 5,716.32 P.O. Box 1178 Atascadero, CA 93423 Susanna L. King 30 055-081-003 6,965.32 5,716.32 8635 Casanova Road Atascadero, CA 93422 P.R. & B.J. Benedict 31 055-101-001 6,965.32 5,716.32 8625 Casanova Road Atascadero, CA 93422 Dean C. & Paula Ott 32 055-101-013 6,965.32 5,716.32 2495 Highland Road and, CA 91786 000051 Name of Diagram Assessor's Preliminary Revised Owner Assmnt No. Parcel No. Assmnt Assmnt 0 R.L. & K.T. Romera 33 055-101-006 $ 6,965.32 $5,716.32 8595 Casanova Road Atascadero, CA 93422 Anthony Avina Tr. 34 055-101-007 6,965.32 5,716.32 8585 Casanova Road Atascadero, CA 93422 R.A. & J.K. Dumouchelle 35 055-101-012 6,965.32 5,716.32 9305 Barranco Atascadero, CA 93422 Kenneth E. Morgan 36 055-101-004 6,965.32 5,716.32 9900 Carmelita Avenue Atascadero, CA 93422 John & Wanda Haynes 37 055-101-014 6,965.32 5,716.32 9870 Carmelita Avenue Atascadero, CA 93422 Wlm. & Frances Knucles 38 055-101-017 6,965.32 5,716.3 8565 Casanova Road Atascadero, CA 93422 James B. Misslin 39 055-101-016 6,965.32 5,716.32 9860 Carmelita Avenue Atascadero, CA 93422 Ronald & Jill Alanis 40 055-101-009 6,965.32 5,716.32 8525 Casanova Road Atascadero, CA 93422 Harry & Doris Hughes 41 055-101-015 6,965.32 5,716.32 8505 Casanova Road Atascadero, CA 93422 Michael & Cherilee Virgil 42 055-062-040 6,965.32 5,716.32 9185 Barranco Atascadero, CA 93422 John R. Zufelt 43 055-062-039 6,965.32 5,716.32 1170 Black Canyon Road Susana Knolls, CA 93063 000052 �ifipe of Diagram Assessor's Preliminary Revised Wer Assmnt No. Parcel No. Assmnt Assmnt Ron,& Renee Silberman 44 055-062-032 $ 6,965.32 $5,716.32 9210 Lucinda Lane Atascadero, CA 93422 Ellershe & B.J. Stevenson 45 055-062-041 6,965.32 5,716.32 9220 Lucinda Lane Atascadero, CA 93422 Robert A. Green 46 055-062-042 _6,965.32 5,716.32 9230 Lucinda Lane Atascadero, CA 93422 Robert & Peggy Babcock 47 055-062-027 6,965.32 5,716.32 9240 Lucinda Lane Atascadero, CA 93422 Isidoro & Martha Espinosa 48 055-062-020 6,965.32 5,716.32 9267 Barranco Road Atascadero, CA 93422 Howard & Joan Marohn 49 055-062-022 6,965.32 5,716.32 OBarranco Heights cadero, CA 93422 Lyle & Linda Curry 50 055-062-019 6,965.32 5,716.32 9263 Lucinda Lane Atascadero, CA 93422 Michael J. Fitzpatrick 51 055-062-028 6,965.32 5,716.32 9253 Lucinda Lane Atascadero, CA 93422 Ramon & B.M. Campbell 52 055-062-029 6,965.32 5,716.32 9243 Lucinda Lane Atascadero, CA 93422 James C. Carey 53 055-062-023 6,965.32 5,716.32 9233 Lucinda Lane Atascadero, CA 93422 Allen & Patricia Bristow 54 055-062-024 6,965.32 5,716.32 P.O. Box 1109 Atascadero, CA 93423 000053 Name of Diagram Assessor's Preliminary Revised Owner Assmnt No. Parcel No. Assmnt Assmnt Kevin & Lorie Almeida 55 055-062-033 $ 6,965.32 $5,716.32 9213 Lucinda Lane Atascadero, CA 93422 William L. Hinson 56 055-061-003 6,965.32 5,716.32 9220 Barranco Road Atascadero, CA 93422 Thomas & Jana Way 57 055-061-002 6,965.32 5,716.32 9240 Barranco Road Atascadero, CA 93422 Floyd & Doreen Lowe 58 054-311-022 6,965.32 5,716.32 9270 Barranco Road Atascadero, CA 93422 Carl Brown 59 054-311-056 6,965.32 5,716.32 9280 Barranco Road Atascadero, CA 93422 William & Joan Keil 60 054-311-055 6,965.32 5,716.32 9380 Barranco Road Atascadero, CA 93422 Milton J. Souza 61 054-311-019 6,965.32 5,716.32 9390 Barranco Road Atascadero, CA 93422 Richard & Elaine Phillips 62 054-311.016 6,965.32 5,716.32 9425 Barranco Road Atascadero, CA 93422 Cornelis & Elsje DeKoster 63 054-311-038 6,965.32 5,716.32 Kagertuinen 53 2172 xJ Sassenheim The Netherlands Fr. 99999 Barbara Spry 64 054-311-040 6,965.32 5,716.32 9325 Barranco Road Atascadero, CA 93422 Donald & Penny Monmonier 65 055-062-036 6,965.32 5,716.32 P.O. Box 1059 Atascadero, CA 93423 000054 f Marne of Diagram Assessor's Preliminary Revised er Assmnt No. Parcel No. Assmnt Assmnt Lee & Linda Freidman 66 055-062-038 $ 6,965.32 $5,716.32 9335 Barranco Road Atascadero, CA 93422 Arthur Stenger 67 055-062-037 6,965.32 5,716.32 9345 Barranco Road Atascadero, CA 93422 Home Savings of America 68 055-062-034 6,965.32 5,716.32 4900 Rivergrade Road Irwindale, CA 91706 Robert L. Dostalek 69 055-062-035 6,965.32 5,716.32 9285 Lucinda Lane Atascadero, CA 93422 Wade & Rita Roben 70 055-062-030 6,965.66 5,716.38 9203 Lucinda Lane Atascadero, CA 93422 0 Area No. 2, Tecorida Charles D. Eras 1 030-351-027 9,907.24 $8,212.38 8300 San Andres Atascadero, CA 93422 Joseph & S. Crawford 2 030-351-34 11,098.50 9,199.84 7105 Tecorida Avenue Atascadero, CA 93422 Lloyd F. Croom 3 030-351-35 11,098.50 9,199.84 11203 Kenny Street Norwalk, CA 90650 Lonny R. Croom 4 030-351-33 11,098.50 9,199.84 7175 Tecorida Atascadero, CA 93422 Glenn A. Vanderlinde 5 030-351-15 9,907.24 8,212.38 7175 Atascadero Avenue Atascadero, CA 93422 10 000055 Name of Diagram Assessor's Preliminary Revised 0 Owner Assmnt No. Parcel No. Assmnt Assmnt Dick L. Kelsey Etal 6 030-351-16 $ 11,065.74 $9,172.69 1945 See Canyon Road San Luis Obispo, CA 93422 Duane Powell 7 030-351-17 11,065.74 9,172.69 7275 Graves Creek Road Atascadero, CA 93422 M. A. Estrada 8 030-351-18 11,065.74 9,172.69 11275 Santa Lucia Atascadero, CA 93422 Michael Langley 9 031-061-36 11,065.74 9,172.69 5 Diana Court Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 Duane E. Powell 10 031-062-01 11,065.74 9,172.69 7275 Graves Creek Road Atascadero, CA 93422 Arnold R. Brooks 11 030-352-08 11,065.74 9,172.690 7350 Tecorida Avenue Atascadero, CA 93422 Dean R. Bendix 12 030-352-26 11,065.74 9,172.69 1679 18th Street Los Osos, CA 93402 James E. Toews 13 030-352-06 11,098.50 9,199.84 7250 Tecorida Atascadero, CA 93422 Glenn A. Vanderlinde 14 030-352-27 11,098.50 9,199.84 7175 Atascadero Avenue Atascadero, CA 93422 M.J. & M.A. Doherty 15 030-352-04 9,907.24 8,212.38 7155 Atascadero Avenue Atascadero, CA 93422 R.D. Nelson 16 030-352-03 9,907.24 8,212.38 8070 Santa Rosa Road Atascadero, CA 93422 000056 A te of Diagram Assessor's Preliminary Revised er Assmnt No. Parcel No. Assmnt Assmnt Donald R. Croom 17 030-352-02 $ 9,907.24 $8,212.38 9250 San Marcos Road Atascadero, CA 93422 Charles H. Heins 18 030-352-24 9,907.24 8,212.38 P.O. Box 1514 Las Vegas, NV 89125 Area No. 3, Las Encinas Orville L. Horst 1 049-241-019 7,363.71 $6,129.87 7205 Del Rio Road Atascadero, CA 93422 John M. Arrambide 2 049-241-021 7,363.71 6,129.87 7243 Del Rio Road Atascadero, CA 93422 Shirley A. Nathan 3 049-241-020 7,363.71 6,129.87 WBox 843 cadero, CA 93423 Russell P. Tolchard 4 049-241-022 7,363.71 6,129.87 7277 Del Rio Road Atascadero, CA 93422 Larry D. Stephens 5 049-241-027 7,363.71 6,129.87 2015 Alturas Atascadero, CA 93422 Gordon T. Davis 6 049-241-033 7,363.71 6,129.87 P.O. Box 2400 Atascadero, CA 93423 Fred D. & Jeannie Pflum 7 049-241-045 7,363.71 6,129.87 2021 Alturas Road Atascadero, CA 93422 Jeffrey M. Trippon 8 049-241-046 7,363.71 6,129.87 2025 Alturas Road Atascadero, CA 93422 00005'7 Name of Diagram Assessor's Preliminary Revised Owner Assmet No. Parcel No. Assmnt Assmnt Keith D. Brummel 9 049-241-043 $ 7,363.71 $6,129.87 2035 Alturas Road Atascadero, CA 93422 E.J. & S. Hunt 10 049-271-010 7,363.71 6,129.87 1538 Bellefontaine Riverside, CA 92506 E.J. & S. Hunt 11 049-271-010 7,363.71 6,129.87 1538 Bellefontaine Riverside, CA 92506 Paula J. Dumouchelle 12 050-031-041 7,363.71 6,129.87 2100 Alturas Road Atascadero, CA 93422 Robert C. Metzinger 13 050-031-040 7,363.71 6,129.87 2054 Alturas Road Atascadero, CA 93422 Robert F. & Del Weiss 14 050-031-039 7,363.71 6,129.870 2042 Alturas Road Atascadero, CA 93422 Robert F. & Del Weiss 15 050-031-038 7,363.71 6,129.87 2042 Alturas Road Atascadero, CA 93422 Rolf E. Rogers 16 049-241-023 7,363.71 6,129.87 2026 Alturas Road Atascadero, CA 93422 O.L. & R.C. Servatius 17 049-241-018 7,363.71 6,129.87 7405 Del Rio Road Atascadero, CA 93422 T.P. & J. Nielsen 18 049-241-024 7,363.71 6,129.87 P.O. Box 427 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Mark A. & Vicki Mitchell 19 049-241-025 7,363.71 6,129.87 7505 Del Rio Road Atascadero, CA 93422 000058 me of Diagram Assessor's Preliminary Revised IRWVner Assmnt No. Parcel No. Assmnt Assmnt Laura L. Simpson 20 050-031-010 $ 7,363.71 $6,129.87 7675 Del Rio Road Atascadero, CA 93422 M. A. & B.J. Tull 21 050-031-011 7,363.71 6,129.87 7695 Del Rio Road Atascadero, CA 93422 Larry D. Chase 22 050-031-003 7,363.71 6,129.87 1940 Bur Oak Drive Modesto, CA 95354 Richard L. Hodgkiss 23 050-031-022 7,363.71 6,129.87 P.O. Box 1307 Atascadero, CA 93423 Jeffrey D. Orcutt 24 049-232-019 7,363.71 6,129.87 7650 Del Rio Road Atascadero, CA 93422 bert L. Yehling 25 049-232-018 7,363.71 6,129.87 T4 Del Rio Road tascadero, CA 93422 Alexander T. Gronstrand 26 049-232-013 7,363.71 6,129.87 7620 Del Rio Road Atascadero, CA 93422 Edward & Doris Paez 27 049-232-012 7,363.71 6,129.87 7600 Del Rio Road Atascadero, CA 93422 Virginia M. Eastin 28 049-232-022 7,363.71 6,129.87 7500 Del Rio Road Atascadero, CA 93422 Robert L. Solley 29 049-271-003 7,363.71 6,129.87 2075 Alturas Road Atascadero, CA 93422 Magdalena C. Nemeth 30 049-271-002 7,363.71 6,129.87 P.O. Box 2399 Atascadero, CA 93423 000059 Name of Diagram Assessor's Preliminary Revised is Owner Assmnt No. Parcel No. Assmnt Assmnt Harold P. & Janet Hayes 31 049-271-001 $ 7,363.71 $6,129.87 2505 Alturas Road Atascadero, CA 93422 32 NOT USED Jami D. Tulledge 33 050-111-011 7,363.71 6,129.87 8755 Del Rio Road Atascadero, CA 93422 34 NOT USED Michael J. & M.D. Vierra 35 050-031-028 7,363.71 6,129.87 1819 State Street, Ste. G Santa Barbara, CA 93101 E.M. & M. M. Crook 36 050-031-016 7,363.71 6,129.87 2460 Alturas Road Atascadero, CA 93422 Edward T. Riffel 37 049-231-015 7,363.71 6,129.87 P.O. Box 974 Atascadero, CA 93423 James W. Fitzgerald 38 050-031-019 7,363.71 6,129.87 2424 Alturas Road Atascadero, CA 93422 Stephanie E. McFadden 39 050-031-020 7,363.71 6,129.87 7955 Del Rio Road Atascadero, CA 93422 Michael J. Santos 40 050-031-034 7,363.71 6,129.87 14700 Morningside Drive Atascadero, CA 93422 Edward H. & Betty Symons 41 050-031-033 7,363.71 6,129.87 833 Venable Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Raul & Marian Cortez 42 050-031-035 7,363.71 6,129.87 7805 Del Rio Road Atascadero, CA 93422 000060 ane of Diagram Assessor's Preliminary Revised InUner Assmnt No. Parcel No. Assrant Assmnt R.S: & M.C. McStadden 43 050-031-008 $ 7,36171 $6,129.87 P.O. Box 6053 Atascadero, CA 93423 E.B. & B.A. Ellis 44 050-031-030 7,363.71 6,129.87 7777 Del Rio Road Atascadero, CA 93422 George N. Knecht 45 050-031-029 7,363.71 6,129.87 7755 Del Rio Road Atascadero, CA 93422 T.R. & Y.E. Rogers 46 050-021-028 7,363.71 6,129.87 5358 Senceca Place Simi Valley, CA 93063 J.H. & S.J. Dulitz 47 050-021-004 7,363.71 6,129.87 1300 Garcia Road Atascadero, CA 93422 bent L. & D.W. Bogusch 48 050-111-012 7,363.71 6,129.87 TDel Rio Road a'scadero, CA 93422 Atascadero Highlands 49 050-111-020 7,363.71 6,129.87 P.O. Box 519 Arroyo Grande, CA 93420 Carl R. Jorgensen 50 050-111-019 7,363.71 6,129.87 8355 Del Rio Road Atascadero, CA 93422 Atascadero Highlands 51 050-101-012 7,363.71 6,129.87 P.O. Box 519 Arroyo Grande, CA 93420 David E. Ormonde 52 050-101-011 7,363.71 6,129.87 P.O. Box 422 Templeton, CA 93465 George R. & M.J. Bird 53 050-092-010 7,363.71 6,129.87 8390 Del Rio Road Atascadero, CA 93422 000061 Name of Diagram Assessor's Preliminary Revised Owner Assmnt No. Parcel No. Assmnt As mnt MW August & Jane Salemi 54 050-092-007 $ 7,363.71 $6,129.87 8370 Del Rio Road Atascadero, CA 93422 Robert Fragione 55 050-021-031 7,363.71 6,129.87 8366 ,Del Rio Road Atascadero, CA 93422 Gerald A. Burns 56 050-021-032 7,363.71 6,129.87 8330 Del Rio Road Atascadero, CA 93422 John W. Hull 57 050-021-33 7,363.71 6,129.87 1527 18th Street San Francisco, CA 94107 Young B. Kim Tr. 58 049-232-040 7,363.71 6,129.87 7545 San Gregorio Road Atascadero, CA 93422 H.S. McPherson 59 049-232-029 7,363.71 6,129.80 P.O. Box 1340 Atascadero, CA 93422 Wilmeth M. Funston 60 049-232^028 7,363.71 6,129.87 7605 San Gregorio Road Atascadero, CA 93422 Thomas H. Demby, Heirs of 61 049-232-027 7,363.71 6,129.87 7685 San Gregorio Road Atascadero, CA 93422 R.C. & V.L. Scott 62 049-231-014 7,363.71 6,129.87 7550 San Gregorio Road Atascadero, CA 93422 Thomas A. Jennings 63 049-231-012 7,363.71 6,129.87 7600 San Gregorio Road Atascadero, CA 93422 Gordon T. Davis 64 049-231-003 7,363.71 6,129.87 P.O. Box 2400 Atascadero, CA 93423 000062 e of Diagram Assessor's Preliminary Revised er Assmnt No. Parcel No. Assrrm t Assmnt Pacific Gas & Electric Co. 65 049-231-002 $ 7,363.71 $6,129.87 525 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94106 Arthur S. & Thelma Cary 66 049-231-001 7,363.71 6,129.87 P.O. Box 332 Cayucos, CA 93430 Liberto R. Nathan 67 050-012-019 7,363.71 6,129.87 8255 Balboa Road Atascadero, CA 93422 Edmon K. Stanley Tr. 68 050-012-018 77,363.71 6,129.87 343 Aviendo San Clemente, CA 92672 Michael A. Valko 69 050-012-020 7,363.71 6,129.87 8130 San Gregorio Road Atascadero, CA 93422 rge R. Urquhart 70 050-012-021 7,363.71 6,129.87 San Gregorio Road Atascadero, CA 93422 Stephen M. & K.L. Thompson 71 050-012-025 7,363.71 6,129.87 8200 San Gregorio Road Atascadero, CA 93422 S.S. & P.J. West 72 050-012-024 7,363.71 6,129.87 8300 San Gregorio Road Atascadero, CA 93422 John R. Bass Tr. 73 049-232-016 7,363.71 6,129.87 7779 Del Rio Road Atascadero, CA 93422 W.E.J. & S.S. Slover 74 - 049-232 020 7,363.71 6,129.87 7800 Del Rio Road Atascadero, CA 93422 G.J. & C.A. Trigueiro 75 049-232-021 7,363.71 6,129.87 P.O. Box 1153 Atascadero, CA 93423 r 000063 Name of Diagram Assessor's Preliminary Revised Owner Assmnt No. Parcel No. Assmnt Assmnt Howard D. Byles 76 049-232-002 $ 7,363:71 $6,129.87 7777 San Gregorio Road Atascadero, CA 93422 Celia T. Wolters 77 049-232-031 7,363.71 6,129.87 2S 567 Nelson Lake.Road Batavia, IL 60510 Celia T. Wolters 78 049-232-033 7,363.71 6,129.87 2S 567 Nelson Lake Road Batavia, IL 60510 Celia T. Wolters 79 049-232-032 7,363.71 6,129.87 2S 567 Nelson Lake Road Batavia, IL 60510 Daniel R. Trojan 80 050-021-026 7,363.71 6,129.87 9000 La Canada Atascadero, CA 93422 William H. & E.M. Bateman 81 050-021-025 7,363.71 6,129.80 8005 San Gregorio Road Atascadero, CA 93422 Donald G. Grigler 82 050-021-024 7,363.71 6,129.87 8055 San Gregorio Road Atascadero, CA 93422 John W. Hull 83 050-021-034 7,363.71 6,129.87 1527 18th Street San Francisco, CA 94107 John W. Hull 84 050-021-029 7,363.71 6,129.87 1527 18th Street San Francisco, CA 94107 Richard A. Malueg 85 050-021-030 7,363.71 6,129.87 10962 Bent Tree Road Santa Ana, CA 92705 Ronald H. & M. Kiel 86 050-021-019 7,363.71 6,129.87 9090 La Canada Lane Atascadero, CA 93422 0 000064 e of Diagram Assessor's Preliminary Revised er Assmnt No. Parcel No. Assmnt Assmnt K. & N. Miller 87 050-021-002 $ 7,363.71 $6,129.87 8405 San Gregorio Road Atascadero, CA 93422 Lindsay R.W. & H.M. 88 050-021-014 7,363.71 6,129.87 8505 San Gregorio Road Atascadero, CA 93422 L.C. & B.A. Kummerow 89 050-021-013 7,363.71 6,129.87 P.O. Box 193 Atascadero, CA 93423 Thomas E. & J.E. McNamara 90 050-021-023 7,363.71 6,129.87 P.O. Box 1958 Atascadero, CA 93423 Richard L. Freeman 91 050-021-020 7,363.71 6,129.87 8715 San Gregorio Road Atascadero, CA 93422 . Walker 92 050-021-022 7,363.71 6,129.87 San Gregorio Road ascadero, CA 93422 William E. Barnes 93 050-021-021 7,363.71 6,129.87 8755 San Gregorio Road Atascadero, CA 93422 Marland J. Holland 94 050-092-003 7,363.71 6,129.87 8775 San Gregorio Road Atascadero, CA 93422 Eveline Blanchette 95 050-092-008 7,363.71 6,129.87 8855 San Gregorio Road Atascadero, CA 93422 Brian L. Cyester 96 050-092-009 7,363.71 6,129.87 8450 Del Rio Road Atascadero, CA 93422 D.F. & M.C. Anderson 97 050-101-015 7,363.71 6,129.87 8445 Del Rio Road Atascadero, CA 93422 000065 Name of Diagram Assessor's Preliminary Revised Owner Assmnt No. Parcel No. Assmnt Assmnt Thomas E. McNamara 98 050-101-009 $ 7,363.71 $6,129.87 8130 El Camino Real Atascadero, CA 93422 John E. King 99 050-101-002 7,363.71 6,129.87 P.O. Box 2119 Avila Beach, CA 93424 John & Darlene Duke 100 050-101-001 7,363.71 6,129.87 8605 Del Rio Road Atascadero, CA 93422 Lewis B. Ind 101 050-091-004 7,363.71 6,129.87 231 Harsin Lane Santa Maria, CA 93455 C.W. & E.W. Hessick 102 050-091-013 7,363.71 6,129.87 P.O. Box 58 Atascadero, CA 93423 Patrick R. & Doris A. Dempsey 103 050-091-012 7,363.71 6,129.87 8700 San Gregorio Road Atascadero, CA 93423 R.G. & E.D. McKenzie 104 050-091-007 7,363.71 6,129.87 690 Thornbrook Drive Merlin, OR 97532 A.H. & L.A. Young 105 050-012-014 7,363.71 6,129.87 8520 San Gregorio Road Atascadero, CA 93422 Stewart C. Hinckley 106 050-012-013 7,363.87 6,130.17 8400 San Gregorio Road Atascadero, CA 93422 000066 REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL 'Agenda Item: D-3 CITY OF ATASCADERO_ _ - - - - - _ _ - - - - - - Meeting Date:''= 5/11/93 - - - Through: Ray Windsor, City Manager Via: MK Henry Engen, Community Development Director From: Pteve Sylvester, City Engineer SUBIECT: Camino Real Improvement Project - INFORMATION MEETING. RECOMMENDATION: Review project construction scope, cost estimates, and schedule. Receive public input. BACKGROUND: At your meeting of April 27, 1993, Council approved the preliminary i Engineer's Report for the Camino Real Improvement Project, and set May 11, 1993, as the first of two public hearings for implementation of the Assessment District. The May 11th meeting is an information meeting established to review details of project costs, construction scope, and schedule. The protest hearing has been scheduled June 22, 1993,-at which time a final determination will be made for approval of the District. DISCUSSION: In accordance with the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913, a "Notice of Property Owners" has been mailed to all effected lot owners. Copies of the notice are attached to this report. The report indicates the preliminary assessment amounts which have not changed since the April 27, 1993, meeting. FISCAL IMPACT: Staff administrative costs would be covered by the 1 % administrative fee previously adopted by Council. Direct contract costs for District administration would be directly refundable from the Assessment District. Assessment engineering costs and all other direct contract administrative costs and other District costs would be funded by the Assessment District. 93107D01.ATA 00006'7 NOTICE TO PROPERTY OWNERS CAMINO REAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council (herein "Council") of the City of Atascadero (herein "City"), California, on November 10, 1992, adopted its Resolution of Intention No. 119-92 (herein "Resolution of Intention"), to undertake the acquisitions and improvements as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference (herein "Project"). The Resolution of Intention authorized the undertaking of assessment proceedings pursuant to the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913, stated the Council's intention that if bonds are issued they are to be issued upon the unpaid assessments pursuant to the Improvement Bond Act of 1915, bonds are to mature over a period of not to exceed thirty-nine (39) years from the second (2nd) day of September next succeeding twelve (12) months from their date, and are to bear interest at a rate of not to exceed twelve percent (12%) per annum. Final bond terms will be determined according to market conditions at the time bonds are sold, although presently it is expected that bonds will mature over a period ranging between 15 to 25 years and bear interest at a rate of approximately seven and one-half percent (7.5%). Pursuant to said Resolution of Intention, a preliminary engineer's report (herein "Report") consisting of schematic plans and specifications, the cost of any land acquisitions, maps and descriptions, an estimate of costs and expenses, and a diagram and an assessment has been prepared by the Assessment Engineer and filed with the City Clerk (herein "Clerk") and is available for public inspection in the Clerk's office. The estimated total cost of said Project is $2,100,000, which is to be allocated according to benefit among all the property within the Camino Real Improvement Project (herein "Assessment District"). Upon review of said Report you will notice that the $2,100,000 total cost of said Project is comprised partly of certain incidental costs necessary to accomplish the issuance of municipal bonds. Some of such incidental costs are self- explanatory, others are not. For example, the cost identified as the Reserve Fund is not a true "cost" due to the fact that it is invested and held by a bank, acting as trustee on behalf of each of the property owners, the bondholders and the City. If you are never delinquent on a bond payment, or alternatively, if you prepay your assessment, you are entitled to a rebate of your respective share of the Reserve Fund upon the earlier of (1) the expiration of the last maturity of bonds, or (2) the prepayment of assessment. Further, the interest earned by the Reserve Fund is used to reduce your yearly payments on the bonds. For further details on all costs of the Project, please refer to the contact person and number at the end of this Notice. 1 000068 NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that Tuesday, the 11th day of May, 1993, at the hour of 7:00 0 'clock p.m. of said day, in the meeting place of said Council, located at the Council Chambers, City Hall, 6500 Palma Avenue, Atascadero, California, are the time and place appointed when and where public testimony will be invited regarding the Assessment District or the particulars of the Report (herein "Informational Hearing"). NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that Tuesday, the 22nd day of June, 1993, at the hour of 7:00 0'clock p.m., in the regular meeting place of said Council at the Council Chambers, City Hall, 6500 Palma Avenue, Atascadero, California, are the time and place fixed by said Council when and where the Council will consider and finally determine whether the public interest and convenience require said acquisitions and improvements, and when and where it will consider and finally act upon the Report, and when and where it will hear all protests in relation to said proposed acquisitions and improvements, or to the estimate of the costs and expenses thereof set forth in the Report, or the extent of the Assessment District, or the plans and specifications, or the proposed diagram or assessment, or to the maps and descriptions, and that any person interested may file a written protest with the Clerk not later than 7:00 o'clock p.m., on June 22, 1993 (herein "Protest Hearing"). NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that any written protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property in which each signer of the protest is interested, and, if the signers are not shown on the last equalized assessment roll as the owners of the property, the protest shall contain or be accompanied by written evidence that the signers are the owners of the property. A suggested form of protest is contained in Section 10310 of the California Streets and Highways Code. Any written or oral protest not made at the time and in the manner provided above shall be deemed to be waived voluntarily by any person who might have made such protest and such person shall be deemed to have consented to the proposed improvement, the extent of the Assessment District, the proposed assessment and any other act, determination, or proceeding on which protest could be made. If the protest is against the proposed improvement and the Council finds that the protest is made by the owners of more than one-half of the area of the land to be assessed for the improvements, and protests are not withdrawn so as to reduce the protests to less than a majority, no further proceedings shall be taken for a period of one year from the date of the decision of the Council on the protest hearing. Any person making a protest may withdraw the protest, in writing, at any time prior to the conclusion of the protest hearing. The Council may confirm, modify, or correct the proposed assessment. If the Council overrules the protest after the June 22, 1993 Protest Hearing, each property owner listed in Exhibit "B" will be given the option to pay their respective assessment in cash within 30 days, unless waived by 100% of the property owners within the Assessment District. If you decide to prepay your assessment in whole or in part during said 30 day period, you will be entitled to a discount to be taken at the time of prepayment. 2 000069 YOUR ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT IS AS FOLLOWS: Assessment Assessor's Assessment Property Owner Number Parcel No. Amount SEE EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO DATED: April 28, 1993. Is/ Lee Raboin City Clerk City of Atascadero FOR FURTHER INFORMATION please call or write to: Mr. Richard D. Kilpatrick, office of the City Engineer, 715 24th Street, Suite O, Paso Robles, California 93446. Telephone: (805)239-0758. 3 000070 EXHIBIT "A" „ DESCRIPTION OF WORK CAMINO REAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT The construction and installation of improvements to serve Camino Real Improvement Project, are as follows: The project consists of construction of street improvements for the extension of Camino Real, including grading, subgrade preparation, base rock, paving, concrete curbs, gutters, and sidewalks, sanitary sewer, water main and services, fire hydrant, street lighting, landscaping, parking facilities, storm drainage, electrical and telephone utility extensions, and appurtenances. • 0000'71 EXHIBIT "B" LIST OF PROPERTY OWNERS Name of Diagram Assessor's- Maximum Owner Assessment No. Parcel No. Assessment Camino Real Fashion Outlet 1 049-141-026 $ 421,470.00 7544 Morro Road Atascadero, California 93422 Golden West Del Rio Corp. 2 049-141-030 $ 425,670.00 7544 Morro Road Atascadero, California 93422 Golden West Del Rio Corp. 3 049-141-041 $ 418,950.00 7544 Morro Road Atascadero, California 93422 HI Rosenkrantz 4 049-141-040 $ 420,000.00 22924 Blue Bird Drive Calabasas, California 91302 Del Rio Enterprises 5 049-141-036 $ 311,430.00 3190 Colima Road Atascadero, California 93422 Del Rio Enterprises 6 049-141-037 $ 102,480.00 3190 Colima Road Atascadero, California 93422 0000'72 REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL Meeting Date: 5(11/93 CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item: D-4 Through: Ray Windsor, City ManageArvelopment Via: Henry Engen, Community Director-. From: Kelly Heffernon, Administrative Analyst SUBJECT: Consideration of replacing the recycling coupon program with an alternative incentive program. RECOMMENDATION: That Council review and select one of the alternatives listed below and direct staff to bring back an amendment to Resolution No. 96-91 reflecting changes to the recycling rebate program.; BACKGROUND: At the 9/24/91 meeting, Council adopted Resolution 96-91 which authorized, in part, Wil-Mar Disposal Company to provide a rebate of up to $1.00 per month as an incentive for customers to participate in the curbside recycling program. This coupon redemption program has been in place since December 1991 . A copy of the Resolution is provided as Attachment A. - On April 13th, your Council examined a financial review of Wil-Mar Disposal Company conducted by Carlos Reynoso, CPA. One of his suggestions for strengthening internal control and operating efficiency was to eliminate the recycling coupons and provide dividends to all recycling customers. Discussed below are options to the 25 cent coupon rebate system for your consideration. DISCUSSION: In general, instituting and/or strengthening a variable can rate is the most effective and simplest tool for encouraging households to reduce the amount of trash they generate and participate in a recycling program. Since the City already has a variable can rate structure, providing additional incentives only augments the program. Outlined below are alternatives to the existing coupon redemption system using the net profit from the California Redemption Value (CRV) revenues. The alternatives can be categorized as either direct or indirect incentives. 0000'73 Alternative A: Recycling Customer Credit As discussed in the auditor's financial report, an alternative would be to provide a credit to each recycling customer's garbage bill determined by subtracting the sorting costs from the CRV profits. The customer receives a direct financial benefit for recycling similar to the coupon program, except the administrative efficiencies for Wil-Mar would increase in the long term. In the short term, Wil-Mar would need to investigate means to keep track of and identify "participating" recycling customers. This would entail altering their current tracking system which could prove to be labor intensive depending on the accuracy of their accounting. To provide an example of this credit program,the total amount received in CRV refunds was $30,281 in 1992 and sorting costs equaled $15,352. The difference was $14,929 (see Attachment B). With a rough estimate of 4,000 recycling customers, this equates to a credit of $3.73 per customer per year. Council should note, however, that sorting costs increased from $32 per ton to $42 per ton in January 1993. If the same tonnages and CRV refunds are used, the difference becomes $10,131, or a credit of 52.53/customer/year. Due to the anticipated small credit return and the personnel time required to distribute the refunds, staff recommends that dividends be determined and issued on an annual basis. Alternative B• Expansion of Recycling Program This- option includes earmarking the CRV revenues for the purpose of enhancing the existing recycling program. For instance, other commodities such as cardboard, paper, magazines, or used motor oil could be added to curbside pick-up. The advantage would be an improved program that the entire residential community could benefit from. The disadvantage would be a loss in any direct individual financial reimbursement or incentive. Alternative C: Provide Special Recycling Events Wil-Mar could use the revenues to conduct one or more recycling events per year in which recyclable household hazardous waste or bulky items such as white goods could be collected. This option also aims at benefiting the community as a whole. Alternative D: Fund Recycling Committee Activities Considering the budgetary constraints, the revenues could be used in part to support Recycling Committee efforts in lieu of General Fund monies. Alternative E: Community Benefit Projects This option aims at allocating the money towards a particular community project that otherwise would not be funded. A highly visible community benefit project would be good publicity and encouragement for the recycling program since it would be funded by a collective effort. 0000'74 Alternative F: Recycling Lottery. Those who set out their recycling bin would be eligible to win the accumulated net CRV revenues for a specified period of time. Although this option would help encourage recycling, only one individual benefits. Tracking participation would again be an issue. Attachment A: Resolution No. 96-91 Attachment B: Accumulated curbside recycling totals for 1992: refunds and costs cc: Betty Sanders Bill Gibbs, Wil-Mar Disposal • 0000'75 ATTACHMENT A RESOLUTION NO. 96-91 1 i A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA AUTHORIZING WIL-MAR DISPOSAL TO IMPLEMENT THE INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM WHEREAS, the City desires to conserve natural resources and preserve the capacity of the Chicago Grade Landfill; and WHEREAS, the Council is mandated by California Statutes (AB939) to implement a program which will reduce solid waste by 25% by 1995 and 50% by 2000; WHEREAS, the Council has embarked on a Integrated Solid Waste Management Plan to reduce, reuse, and recycle Atascadero' s waste stream; and WHEREAS, additional fees must be collected to implement these programs. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council 1. Wil-Mar Disposal Company be authorized to implement an Integrated Waste Management Program, incorporating the Curbside Recycling Program to collect various recyclable materials, including Green Wastes and, • 2. Wil-Mar Disposal Company is authorized to increase trash collection rates for residential customers as follows: $1. 00 per month for single can customers and $2.00 for 90-gallon cart customers. A rebate of up to $1.00/mo is authorized as an incentive for those customers who participate in the recycling program. On motion by Councilman Nimmo, and seconded by Councilman Lilley, the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote: AYES : Councilmembers Borgeson, Lilley, Dexter, Nimmo and Mayor Shiers NOES : None ABSENT: None ADOPTED: September 24, 1991 ATTEST: ,. -:9 CITY OF ATASC.ADERO, CALIFORNIA LEE RABOIN, City Clerk ALDEN SHIERS, Mayor 000076 Resolution No. 96-91 Page 1 APPROVED AS TO FORM: ARTHER MbNTANDON City Attorney APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: GREG-tU —E Director of Public Works 0000'7'7 ATTACHMENT B ACCUMULATED CURBSIDE RECYCLING TOTALS FOR 1992: REFUNDS AND COSTS Month Ca. Redemption Sorting Costs Coupon Value (CRV) Rebates Jan. $2,632.96 $1,188.96 (37.16 tons) $475.25 Feb. $2,635.75 $989.44 (30.92 tons) $833.50 March $3,101 .16 $1,072.16 (33.51 tons) $975.00 April $2,034.24 $1,052.16 (32.88 tons) $1 ,135.00 May $1,926.67 $1,050.08 (32.82 tons) $1 ,136.50 June $1 ,777.77 $1,058.72 (33.09 tons) $1,357.75 July $2,787.72 $ 1 462.72 45.71 tons) $1,345.25 Aug. $2,574.33 $1,374.40 (42.95 tons) $1,307.25 Sept. $2,617.16 $2,617.16 (43.67 tons) $1,567.50 Oct. $2,389.92 $2,389.92 (46.45 tons) $1 ,622.75 Nov. $2,711 .00 $2,711 .00 (46.95 tons) $1,567.50 Dec. $3,092.60 $3,092.60 (53.67 tons) $1,685.50 Total: $30,281 .28 $15,352.03 $15,008.75 Ca. Redemption less 1992 Sorting Costs = $14,929.25 000078 s *, 5111/93 °F D-5 i s Ma ry 1 Christ Chapel �• �� P.O. BOX 817 ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA 93423 Dear Mr. Windsor, I am requesting the Atascadero City Council to place on it's agenda time for us to discuss our city's policy and procedures governing the use of facilities. The section of the city ordinances that I would like to discuss is titled "Ceremonial Occassions". This section seems to me to be unnecessarily discriminatory against the free exercise of religion which is guaranteed by the First Ammendment. It wasn't too long ago that one of your city employees told me that it is 'illegal to teach Sunday School in a building owned by the city because of Seperation of Church and State". Really? Is the intent of this city policy to discriminate against churches? When I met with our city attorney he said that the city is fol- lowing the advise of legal council somewhere in L.A.. He said that they could show case support for "Separation of Church and State" with regard to the use of city buildings by churches. I asked why it was legal for schools to rent their facilities to us as long as we could show that we were moving toward building / a building and he said he didn't much about that. He said, "If you want me to show you where the State of California directs cities not to allow worship services in their buildings then the city council of Atscadero will have to direct me to spend the hours necessary to research this issue. I am only authorized to spend one hour researching an issue without the city council directing me to do otherwise." I am told that the city of Fontana rents its buildings to churches and that neither Paso nor San Luis has an inflamatory policy against churches. Why does Atascadero? " In our case, we were renting the Senior Citizen's building for worship services on Sunday mornings. If the Pavilion was empty and no one was using it we wanted to use it for teaching 000019 Sunday School. If anyone wanted to use the building we would gladly allow that party to use the building and community services knew this. I resent the misstated allegation that we were trying to tie up the Pavilion with a long term lease. Our intent was "community friendly" , the city's was not. Be that as it may, I would like the council to; 1. Request the city attorney to substantiate his claim that it is stipulated by the State of California that city's should not rent their fatalities to churches or 2. Rewrite the city policy so that it does not openly discriminate against churches or 3, ask that a committee be formed to look into this issue further and come back to the council within six weeks with a recommendation. If the city opts for the third consideration I would like to have a representative from the Ministers association to be part of the panel. I am also available to serve in this capacity. Res tfully submitted, rey ejohns Pastor Christ Chapel 000080 REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item: D-6 CITY OF ATASCADERO Through: Ray Windsor, City Manager Meeting Date: 5/11/93 From: Mark Joseph, Administrative Services Director "r, 41?)," SUBJECT: Placing Delinquent Garbage Bills on the County Tax Roll. RECOMMENDATIONS: ( 1) Motion to waive reading of Ordinance No. 269 in full and read by title only; (2 ) Motion to approve Ordinance No. 269 on second reading by title only. BACKGROUND: Council introduced Ordinance No. 269 on first reading at its April 27 meeting. This second reading will adopt the ordinance, which will take effect 30 days from adoption. The ordinance will allow delinquent garbage bills to be placed on the County Tax Roll for collection. All out-of-pocket expenses will be reimbursed by Wil-Mar. 000081 ORDINANCE NO. 269 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO AMENDING TITLE 6 OF THE CITY MUNICIPAL CODE (HEALTH AND SANITATION) WHEREAS, the City of Atascadero adopted Ordinance 56 establishing Title 6 of the Municipal Code pertaining to Health and Sanitation; and WHEREAS, the City Council is desirous of amending the Health and Sanitation regulations; and NOW, THEREFORE, The City Council of the City of Atascadero does ordain as follows : Section 1 . Title 6 of the City of Atascadero Municipal Code is hereby amended as shown on the attached Exhibit A, which is hereby made a part of this ordinance by reference. Section 2 . Publication The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to ;be published • once within fifteen (15) days after its passage in the Atascadero News, a newspaper of general circulation, printed, published, and circulated in the City in accordance with Section 36933 of the Government Code; shall certify the adopting and posting of this ordinance and shall cause this ordinance and this certification together with proof of posting to be entered into the Book of Ordinances of the City. Section 3 . Effective Date This ordinance shall go into effect and be in full force and effect at 12 : 01 a.m. on the 31st day after its passage. On motion by Councilperson and seconded by Councilperson , the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote: AYES : NOES : ABSENT: 000,0'.til