HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 03/23/1993 LIC REVID I COPv .,
PMkSt DO N•T REMOVE
ROM COUNTEP,
AGENDA
ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
CITY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING
6500 PALMA AVENUE, 4TH FLOOR ROTUNDA F OOM
MARCH 23, 1993
7:00 P.M.
This agenda is prepared and posted pursuant to the requirements of,Ggvernment Code
Section 54954.2. By listing a topic on this agenda, the City Council has expressed its
intent to discuss and act on each item. In addition to any action idea ified in the *def
general description of each item, the action that may be taken shall in e: A referral to
staff with specific requests for information; continuance> specific rection to staff
concerning the policy or mission of the item,discontinuance of consideration;authorization
to enter into negotiations and execute agreements pertaining to the hem, adoption or
approval,•and, disapproval.
Copies of the staff reports or other documentation relating to each ftem of business
referred to on the agenda are on file in the office of the City Clerk (Rao 208) and in the
Information Office (Room 103), available for public inspection during C ty Hall business
hours. The City Clerk will answer any questions regarding the agenda.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need specFal assistance to_
participate in a City meeting or other services offered by this City,please contact the City
Managers Office ((805) 461-5010)or the City Clerk's Office 1(805)461 50741. Notifica-
tion at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time when services are needed will assist the
City staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility
to the meeting or service.
RULES OF PUBLIC PARTICIPATION:
* Members of the audience may speak on any item on the agenda.
* A person may speak for five (5) minutes.
* No one may speak for a second time until everyone wishir g to speak has had
an opportunity to do so.
* No one may speak more than twice on any item.
* Council Members may question any speaker; the speakei may respond but,
after the allotted time has expired, may not initiate further discussion.
The floor will then be closed to public participation and open for Council
discussion.
Call to Order
Pledge of Allegiance
Roll Call
City Council Comments:
Proclamations: "Month of the Child April, 1993
"Americans with Disabilities Month", April, 1993
COMMUNITY FORUM:
The City Council values and encourages exchange of ideas and comments from
you, the citizen. The Community Forum period-is provided to receive comments from
the public on matters other than scheduled agenda items. To increase the effective-
ness of Community Forum, the following rules will be enforced
A ;maximum of 30 minutes will be allowed for Community Forum, unless
Council authorizes an extension.
All remarks shall be addressed to Council, as a whole, and not to any individual
member thereof. _
No person shall be permitted to make slanderous, profane or personol remarks
against any elected official, commissionsand staff.
A. COMMITTEE REPORTS (The following represent ad hoc or standing commit-
tees. Informative status reports will be given, as felt necessary.):
1 . S.L.O. Council of Governments
2. S.L.O. Regional Transit Authority
3. Solid/Hazardous Waste Task Force
4. City/School Committee
5. Traffic Committee
6. County Water Advisory Board
7.' Economic Round Table
8. Colony Roads Committee
9. Liability Claims Review & Finance Committee
B. CONSENT CALENDAR:
All matters listed under Item B, Consent Calendar, are considered to be routine, and
will be enacted by one motion in the form listed below. There will be no separate
discussion on these items. A member of the Council or public may, by request, have
any item removed from the Consent Calendar, which shall then be reviewed and acted
upon separately after the adoption of the Consent Calendar:
1. FINANCE DIRECTOR'S REPORT - January, 1993 (Cont'd from;3/9/93)
2. FINANCE. DIRECTOR'S REPORT - February, 1993,
3. CITY TREASURER'S REPORT February, 1993
2
4. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2-90, 11145-11205 EL CAMINO REAL - Considera-
tion of time extension request (Montanaro/North Coast Engineering)
5. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 27-90, LOT 3, PINE MOUNTAIN PARK - Considera-
tion of time extension request (Noakes/RRM Design)
6. INITIATE TAX AND REVENUE ANTICIPATION NOTE (TRAN) FINANCING FOR
FY1993-94 (Regional pool)
7. RESOLUTION NO. 15-93 - .Supporting League of California Cities Channel
Counties Division 1993 Legislative Action Program
8. REQUEST TO SUPPORT THE POSITION OF THE COALITION FOR COOPERA-
TIVE GOVERNMENT
9. RESOLUTION NO. 18-93 - Authorizing the execution of E certificate of local
approval of application for 1993 Federal Emergency Grani funds
C. PUBLIC HEARINGS;
1 PROTEST HEARING, CEASE AND DESIST AREAS C & E° (SEPARADO &
CAYUCOS) AND I (SAN GABRIEL) - For individuals being equired to hook-up
to public sewer, pursuant to Ordinance No. 246
2. RESOLUTION NO. 16-93 - CDBG FUNDING APPLICATION - Public hearing to
consider potential application for Community Development Block Grant,
assistance to fund the site acquisition and rehabilitation for the North County
Women's Resource Center domestic violence shelter
D REGULAR BUSINESS:
1. ORDINANCE NO. 268 - Amending Ordinance No. 252, Section 2-13.03 of the
Atascadero Municipal Code, amending the terms of themembers of the Parks
& Recreation Commission
(Recommend motion to adopt on second reading by title nly)
2. RESOLUTION NO. 17-93 - Supporting the San Luis Obispo County Land
Conservancy's grant application fora Highway 101 Landscaping Enhancement
and Gateway Signage Program
3
E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION:_
1. City
Council
2. City Attorney
3. City Clerk,
4. City Treasurer
5. City Manager,
4
P R O C L A M A T I O N
"MONTH OF THE CHILD"
April, 1993
WHEREAS, Community Partners in Child Care and other local
organizations, in conjunction with the National Association for the
Education of Young Children, is celebrating the Month of the Child,
April 1993; and =�
t
WHEREAS, By calling attention to the need for quality child
care for all children and families within our community, these
groups hope to improve the quality and availability of such
services; and
WHEREAS, The quality of services is primarily determined by
the individual teachers and caregivers who perform this valuable
• work; and
WHEREAS, The work of early childhood professionals is appre-
ciated and valued in our community; and
WHEREAS, Quality child care services provide for children's
sound growth and development;
NOW, THEREFORE, The City Council of the City of Atascadero
does hereby proclaim April 1993 as
"Month of the Child"
in Atascadero and urges all citizens to recognize the valuable
contributions of early childhood teachers and caregivers and to
actively support the need for more and higher quality child care
within our community.
MARTY KUDLAC, Mayor Pro Tempore
City of Atascadero, CA
March 23, 1993
3/23/93 B-1
• FINANCE DIRECTOR' S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF JANUARY, 1993 (58. 3%)
TABLE ONE: SCHEDULE OF CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE, BY FUND
6/30/92 YR-TO-DATE YR-TO-DATE YR-TO-DATE
FUND NAME BALANCE REVENUES EXPENSES BALANCE
General Fund (42 , 708 ) 3 , 317 , 485 3 , 721 , 994 (447 , 217 )
Gas Tax 347 , 978 212 , 630 705 , 935 ( 145 , 327 )
Zoo Operations ( 11 , 355 ) 102 , 624 124 , 253 ( 32 , 985 )
Dial-A-Ride 87 , 444 116 , 627 209 , 960 ( 5 ,889 )
Wastewater 8 , 553 , 406 387 , 542 502 , 878 8 , 438 , 070
Park Concession 16 , 1.73 13 , 649 8 , 863 20 , 959
Lake Pavilion ( 19 , 569) 29 , 028 27 , 708 ( 18 , 249 )
Aquatics 0 16 , 227 30 , 621 ( 14 , 394)
Recreation 0 192 , 579 210 , 676 ( 18 ,097 )
Tree Planting Trust 28 , 032 7 , 216 534 34 , 714
Sidewalk Trust 35 , 586 0 0 35 , 586
A.D. #3 - Debt Service 12 , 000 3 , 625 i0 15 , 625
A.D. #4 - Debt Service 164 , 781 55 , 689 121 , 003 99 ,468
A.D. #5 - Debt Service 54 , 201 19 , 381 37 , 536 36, 046
C.O.P . Debt Service 292,850 95 , 000 2, 891 384 , 958
Capital Projects Fund 59 , 715 1 , 494 , 809 1 , 451 , 920 102 , 603
Police Impact Fee ( 78 , 901 ) 8 , 015 29 , 000 (99 , 887 )
Fire Impact Fee 138 , 781 20 , 749 0 159 , 530
Parks Impact Fee ( 326, 154) 34 , 739 16 , 102 ( 307 , 518 )
Drainage Impact Fee 321 , 920 22 , 004 25 , 357 318 , 566
• Amapoa-Tecorida Fund 150 , 045 13 , 883 228 163 , 700
Streets & Bridges Impact 473 , 414 31 , 601 366, 449 138 , 566
St . Maint . Districts 36, 456 1 , 112 0 37 , 568
TDA/Non-Transit 828 , 312 27 , 309 246 , 741 608 , 379
------------------------------------------------
TOTALS 11 , 122 , 404 6, 223 , 522 7 ,840 , 649 9 , 505 , 277
NOTES :
1 . 6/30/92 Fund Balances are from the City' s books and have not
been confirmed by the outside auditors .
2 . The 6/30/92 Fund Balance figures represent the total equity
position of the fund . For Enterprise funds , such as Wastewater ,
this includes the fund' s fixed assets . As a result , the City' s
cash position may be considerably less than it ' s equity position.
FINDIR.wk3 - 1 --Mar-93
FINANCE DIRECTOR' S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF JANUARY, 1993 ( 58 .3%)
TABLE TWO: BUDGET-TO-ACTUAL COMPARISON, GENERAL FUND ONLY
FY 92-93 BALANCE PCT. OF
REVENUE/EXPENDITURE BUDGET YR-TO-DATE REMAINING BUDGET
�-400 000====1 , 37 , 268====1 , 16 , 732--- 51 . 6%
Property Taxes 53 . 0%
Sales Tax 1 , 850 ,000 980 , 554 869 , 446 50 . 3%
55 , 343 54 , 657
Transient Occupancy Tax 110 , 000 38 , 755 366 , 245 9 . 6%
Franchise Fees 405 , 000 0 . 1%
. 5.0 , 100 50 50 , 050
Other Taxes 62884 47 , 117 57 . 2%
Business Licenses 1 ,
10 , 000 170 , 837 135 , 163 44. 2%
Construction Permits 306 , 000 460 , 163 389 , 299 54 . 2%
Motar Vehicle In-Lieu 850 , 000 32 , 891 28 , 109 53 . 9%
Other State Subventions 61 , 000 100 , 053 44 , 947 69 . 0%
Other Intergovernmental 145 , 000 41 , 123 132 , 2x", 7 69 . 0%
Planning & Eng. Fees 173 , 400 21 , 123 27 , 9 0 43 . 6%
Other Fees & Charges 49 , 500 20 , 753 40 , 147 34 . 1%
Fines & Forfeitures 60 ,900 8 , 563 42 . 8%
Investment Earnings 15 , 00 6 ,437
67 ,6600 18 , 342 49 , 258 27 . 1%
Other Revenue 105 , 600 71 , 900 59 . 5%
Transfers In 177 , 500
-------------------
TOTAL REVENUE 6,831 ,000 3 , 317 ,485 3 , 513 , 515 48. 6%
'6 955
Council/Clerk/Treasurer 40 , 264 36 , 691 52 . 3%33 , 901 46 , 099 42 . 4%
City Attorney 80 , 000 5
135 ,050 76 , 71n' 58 , 334
City Manager 32 , 616 32 , 909 - 49 • o
Personnel 65 , 525
Police 2 , 215 , 190 1 , 196, 838 1 , 018 , 352 56. 8%
Fire 1 ,092 , 750 620, 667 472 , 083
245 , 700 125 , 082 120 , 618 50 . 9%
Public Works 49 . 9%
Community Development 709 , 460 354 , 230 355 , 230
, 498 17 , 102 45 . 9%
Community Services/Admin 31 , 6 14
00 114 ,498 136 , 454 58 . 1%
Parks 326 ,005
90 , 280 112 , 470 44 . 5%
Building Maintenance 202 ' 750 211 , 759 178 , 241 54 . 3%
Streets 390 ,000 151 , 854 120 , 596 55 . 7%
Finance 272 , 450
250 , 750 202 , 650 48 , 100 80 . 8%
Risk Management 250955 232, 245 51 . 9%
,
Non-Departmental 483 , 200 2 51 . 6%
Transfers Out
252 , 065 13 -----
0 , 133 121 , 93_______________
------------------------ --
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 6,829,450 3 , 721 ,994 3 , 107 ,456
54. 5%
NOTES :
1 . Construction Permits includes Plan Check fees .
•
FINDIR.wk3 - 17-Mar-93
FINANCE DIRECTOR' S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF JANUARY', 1993 ( 58 . 3%)
TABLE THREE: PRIOR YEAR COMPARISON, GENERAL FUND ONLY
CURRENT PRIOR PCT.
REVENUE/EXPENDITURE MONTH YR-TO-DATE YR-TO-DATE CHANGE
Property Taxes 48 , 831 1 , 237 , 268 1 , 268 , 078 -2 . 4%
Sales Tax 117 , 800 980 , 554 957 , 562 2 . 4%
Transient Occupancy Tax 24 , 532 55 , 343 52 , 351 5 . 7%
Franchise Fees 7 , 158 38 , 755 35 , 610 8 . 8%
Other Taxes 0 50 50 0 . 0%
Business Licenses 16 , 336 62 , 884 59 , 432 5 . 8%
Construction Permits 28 , 600 135 , 163 189 , 974 -28 . 9%
Motor Vehicle In-Lieu 71 , 359 460 , 701 454, 428 1 . 4%
Other State Subventions 15 , 058 32, 891 27 , 905 17 . 9%
Other Intergovernmental 4 , 310 100 , 053 165 , 332 -39 . 5%
Planning & Eng. Fees 3 , 654 41 , 123 37 , 929 8 . 4%
Other Fees & Charges 4, 794 21 , 570 35 , 77 -39 . 6%
Fines & Forfeitures 3 , 299 20, 753 2 , 906 614. 1%
Investment Earnings 1 , 062 6 , 437 30 , 674 -79 . 0%
Other Revenue 16 , 138 18 , 342 109 , 721 -83 . 3%
Transfers In 14 , 375 105., 600 163 , 684 -35 . 5%
------------------------------------------------
TOTAL REVENUE 377, 304 3 ,317 ,485 3 , 591 , 343 -7 . 6%
Council/Clerk/Treasurer 4 , 570 40 , 264 51 , 548 -21 . 9%
City Attorney 2 , 807 33 , 901 55 , 996 -39 . 5%
City Manager 10 , 252 76 , 716 85 , 045 -9 . 8%
Personnel 4 , 447 32 , 616 64 , 541 -49 . 5%
Police 170 , 475 1 , 196 , 838 1 , 233 , 278 -3 . 0%
Fire 83 , 364 620 , 667 692 , 023 -10 . 3%
Public Works 17 , 260 125 , 082 237 , 385 -47 . 3%
Community Development 40 , 075 354 , 230 462, 746 -23 . 5%
Community Services/Admin 1 , 481 14 , 498 28 , 723 -49 . 5%
Parks 20, 933 I89 , 551 235 , 386 -19. 5%
Building Maintenance 15 , 271 90 , 280 136, 585 -33 . 9%
Streets 29 , 184 211 , 759 235 , 659 -10 . 1%
Finance 25 , 428 151 ,854 161 , 136 -5 . S%
Risk Management 3 , 338 202 , 650 225 , 574 -10 . 2%
Non-Departmental 84 , 123 250 , 955 316, 741 -20 . 8%
Transfers Out 8 , 386 130 , 133 484 , 476 -73 . 1%
------------------------------------------------
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 521 ,393 3 , 721 , 994 4, 706,842 -20. 9%
NOTES :
1 . Construction Permits includes Plan Check Fees .
FINDIR.wk3 - 17-Mar-93 000002
FINANCE DIRECTOR' S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF JANUARY, 1993 (58 . 3%)
NOTE TO THE FINANCE DIRECTOR'S REPORT:
The numbers in the Treasurer ' s Report are cash based ; this report
is accrual-based. Thus , the Treasurer ' s Report measures cash
actually received or spent during the month; this report presents
revenues earned or expenditures incurred, regardless of when
the actual receipt or disbursement occurs . As a result , figures
from the two reports will not always tie-in together .
I , Mark Joseph, do hereby certify that the above information is
accurate and reflects the City' s financial position for the
period specified. However , the information in this report is
unaudited, and may therefore be subject to future revisiots .
Mark Joseph, Finance Director
FINDIR.wk3 - 17-Mar-93 0000011
3/23/93 B-2
FINANCE DIRECTOR' S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF FEBRUARY, 1993 (66.6%)
TABLE ONE: SCHEDULE OF CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE, BY FUND
6/30/92 YR-TO-DATE YR-TO-DATE YR-TO-DATE
FUND NAME BALANCE REVENUES EXPENSES BALANCE
--------------------------------------
General Fund ( 42 , 708 ) 3 , 659 , 166 4 , 198 , 209 ( 581 , 752 )
Gas Tax 347 , 978 249 , 602 683 , 111 (85 , 530 )
Zoo Operations ( 11 , 355 ) 114 , 118 142 , 697 ( 39 , 934)
Dial-A-Ride 87 , 444 120 , 326 238 , 949 ( 31 , 179 )
Wastewater 8 , 553 , 406 400 , 625 579 , 733 8 , 374, 298
Park Concession 16, 173 13 , 649 8 , 946 20 , 875
Lake Pavilion ( 19 , 569) 31 , 938 30 , 699 ( 18 , 330 )
Aquatics 0 16 , 207 30 , 621 ( 14, 414)
Recreation 0 224, 965 235 , 734 ( 10 , 769 )
Tree Planting Trust 28 , 032 7 , 216 554 34 , 694
Sidewalk Trust 35 , 586 0 -+ 0 35 , 586
A.D. #3 - Debt Service 12 ,000 3 , 625 0 15 , 625
A.D. #4 - Debt Service 164 , 781 56 , 953 152, 553 69 , 181
A.D. 145 - Debt Service 54 , 201 20 , 102 17 , 434 56 , 868
C.O . P . Debt Service 292 , 850 95 , 000 2 , 891 384 , 958
Capital Projects Fund 59 , 715 1 , 494, 966 1 , 579 , 620 ( 24 , 939 )
Police Impact Fee ( 78 , 901) 8 , 626 29 , 000 (99 , 275 )
Fire Impact Fee 138 , 781 22, 935 0 161 , 716
Parks Impact Fee ( 326 , 154) 38 , 248 16, 102 ( 304, 009 )
Drainage Impact Fee 321 , 920 23 , 686 25 , 357 320 , 249
Amapoa-Tecorida Fund 150, 045 18 , 177 228 167 , 994
Streets & Bridges Impact 473 , 414 35 , 239 366, 449 142 , 204
St . Maint . Districts 36 , 456 1 , 232 0 37 , 688
TDA/Non-Transit 828 , 312 27 , 309 246, 741 608 , 879
TOTALS 11 , 122, 404 6,683 , 908 8 , 585 , 628 9 , 220 , 685
NOTES :
1 . 6/30/92 Fund Balances are from the City' s books and have not
been confirmed by the outside auditors .
2. The 6/30/92 Fund Balance figures represent the total equity
position of the fund . For Enterprise funds , such as Wastewater ,
this includes the fund ' s fixed assets . As a, result , the City' s
cash position may be considerably less than it ' s equity position.
0000011
FINDIR. wk3 - 17-Mar-93
FINANCE DIRECTOR' S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF FEBRUARY, 1993 (66 . 6%)
TABLE TWO: BUDGET-TO-ACTUAL COMPARISON, GENERAL FUND ONLY
FY 92-93 BALANCE
PCT. 001
REVENUE/EXPENDITURE BUDGET YR-TO-DATE REMAINING BUDGET
Property Taxes 2 , 400 ,000 1 , 266 , 864 1 , 133 , 136 52 . 8%
Sales Tax 1 , 850 ,000 1 , 137 , 654 712 , 346 61 . 5%
Transient Occupancy Tax 110 ,000 55 , 343 54 , 657 50 . 3%45 , 653 359 , 347 11 . 3%
Franchise Fees 405 ,000 22, 393 27 , 707 44 . 7%
Other Taxes 50 , 100
Business Licenses 110 ,000 65 , 736 44, 264 59 . 8%
Construction Permits 306 ,000 149 , 947 156 ,053 49 . 0%
Motor Vehicle In-Lieu 850 ,000 533 , 266 316 , 734 62 . 7%
Other State Subventions 61 ,000 32 ' 891 28 , 109 53 . 9%33 , 331 77 .0%
Other Intergovernmental 145 ,000 111 , 669 77 0%
Planning & Eng. Fees 173 , 400 46 , 753 126N647
49 , 500 19 , 705 29 ,L795 39 . 8%
Other Fees & Charges 60 , 900 24 , 195 36 ,705 39 . 7%
Fines & Forfeitures 6, 813 8 , 187 45 . 4%
Investment Earnings 15 ,000
Other Revenues 67 , 600 20 , 308 47 , 292 30 . 0% `
Transfers In 177 , 500 119 , 975 57 , 525 67 . 6%
--------------------------------
TOTAL REVENUE 6,831 ,000 3 ,659, 166 3 , 171 ,834 53 . 6%
Council/Clerk/Treasurer 76 , 955 50 , 87 26 , 368 65 . 7%46, 851 41 . 4%
City Attorney 80 ,000 33 , 149 48 , 117 6
City Manager 135 , 050 86, 933
Personnel 65 , 525 38 , 199 27 , 326 5
2, 215 , 190 1 , 363 , 225 851 , 965 61 . 5%
Police 64 . 4%
Fire 1 ,092, 750 704 , 232 388 , 518
Public Works 245 , 700 144, 291 101 , 409 58 . 7%
Community Development 709 , 460 394 , 969 314 , 491 55 . 7%
50 . 7%
Community Services/Admin 31 , 600 16 ,018 15 , 582 63 . 9%
Parks 326,005 208 , 346 117 , 659
Building Maintenance 202, 750 101 , 475 101 , 275 60 .2
Streets 390 ,000 242 , 621 147 , 379 62 8%
Finance 272, 450 170 , 989 101 , 461
Risk Management 250 , 750 205 ,975 44 , 775 82 . 1%
Non-Departmental
483 , 200 298 , 679 184 , 521 61 . 8%
Transfers Out 252,065 138 , 519 113 , 546------55_Q %
---------------------------------
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 6,829,450 4, 198, 209 2, 631 , 241 61 . 5%
00000,11
FINDIR.wk3 - 17-Mar-93
FINANCE DIRECTOR' S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF FEBRUARY, 1993 (66. 6%)
TABLE THREE: PRIOR YEAR COMPARISON, GENERAL FUND ONLY
CURRENT PRIOR PCT.
REVENUE/EXPENDITURE MONTH YR-TO-DATE YR-TO-DATE CHANGE
Property Taxes 29 , 596 1 , 266 , 864 1 , 310 , 604 -3 . 3%
Sales Tax 157 , 100 1 , 137 , 654 1 , 119 , 362 1 . 6%
Transient Occupancy Tax 0 55 , 343 60 , 078 -7 . 9%
Franchise Fees 6 , 899 45 , 653 146 , 142 -68 . 8%
Other Taxes 2 , 492 22 , 393 20 , 180 11 . 0%
Business Licenses 2 , 853 65 , 736 62, 795 4 . 7%
Construction Permits 14 , 784 149 , 947 209 , 757 -28 . 5%
Motor Vehicle In-Lieu 72 , 566 533 , 266 525 , 269 1 . 5%
Other State Subventions 0 32, 891 46 ,060 -28 . 6%
Other Intergovernmental 8 , 192 111 , 669 189 , 949 -41 . 2%
Planning & Eng. Fees 5 , 630 46 , 753 341123 37 . 0%
Other Fees & Charges 1 , 560 19 , 705 301219 -34 . 8%
Fines & Forfeitures 3 , 442 24 , 195 3 , 256 643 . 1%
Investment Earnings 377 6, 813 33 , 163 -79 . 5%
Other Revenues 1 , 966 20 , 308 105 , 259 -80 . 7%
Transfers In 14 , 375 119 , 975 184, 681 -35 . 0%
-----------------------------------------------
TOTAL REVENUE 321 ,830 3 , 659, 166 4, 080,897 -10 . 3%
Council/Clerk/Treasurer 9 , 571 50 , 587 57 , 520 -12 . 1%
City Attorney 0 33 , 149 62 , 774 -47 . 2%
City Manager 10 , 217 86, 933 96 , 909 -10 . 3%
Personnel 5 , 583 38 , 199 73 ,030 -47 . 7%
Police 166 , 386 1 , 363 , 225 1 , 410, 130 -3 . 3%
Fire 83 , 565 704 , 232 765 , 075 -8 . 0%
Public works 19 , 209 144 , 291 268 , 275 -46 . 2%
Community Development 40 , 738 394, 969 521 , 570 -24 . 3%
Community Services/Admin 1 , 521 16 , 018 32, 697 -51 . 0%
Parks 18 , 795 208 , 346 261 , 300 -20 . 3%
Building Maintenance 11 , 195 101 , 475 157 , 038 -35 . 4%
Streets 30 , 862 242, 621 264 , 718 -8 . 3%
Finance 19 , 136 170 , 989 181 , 192 -5 . 6%
Risk Management 3 , 325 205 , 975 228 , 656 -9 . 9%
Non-Departmental 47 , 724 298 , 679 345 , 226 -13 . 5%
Transfers Out 8 , 386 138 , 519 260 , 520 -46 . 8%
-----------------------------------------------
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 476,215 4, 198, 209 4, 986, 630 -15 . 8%
FINDIR . wk3 - 17-Mar-93 00000f;
FINANCE DIRECTOR' S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF FEBRUARY, 1993 (66.6%)
NOTES TO THE FINANCE DIRECTOR'S REPORT:
1 . The numbers in the Treasurer ' s Report are cash based; this report
is accrual-based . Thus , the Treasurer ' s Report measures cash
actually received or spent during the month; this report presents
revenues earned or expenditures incurred , regardless of when
the actual receipt or disbursement occurs . As a _ result , figures
from the two reports will not always tie-in together .
I , Mark Joseph, do hereby certify that the above information is
accurate and reflects the City' s financial position for the
period specified. However , the information in this report is
unaudited, and may therefore be subject to future revisions .
t
Mark Joseph, Finance Director
FINDIR.wk3 - 17-Mar-93 (300001-11
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item: B-3
From: Micki Korba, City Treasurer Meeting Date: 3/23/93
SUBJECT: City Treasurer's Report
t
RECOMMENDATION:
Attached is a copy of the February report, recommended for Council approval.
i DISCUSSION:
I was hoping to show the breakdown of the monies in the Orange County Investment
pool--actual amount of funds belonging to Wastewater, Genera( Fund, etc. Infor-
mation was not available.
We will have to start deleting TRANs monies in April (50%), May (30%), June (20%),
since that money will need to be in a separate account and no longer available. Any
interest earnings, however, in excess of actual interest payable will revert back to the
City after November 18th scheduled repayment.
0000(o11�
-}
t
- _. _ �
� tr . _
(�(jO{�t�<�
CITY OF ATASCADERO -
TREASURER'S REPORT
FOR THE MONTH ENDING FEBRUARY 28,1993
TABLE £; SCHEDULE OF CASH RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENTS
1943 L992
Beginning Cash Balance 5,656,038.51 5,165,945.124
Plus: Cash Receipts 417,467.34 561,288.05
Plus. Tran Receipts 0.00 0.00
Less: Disbursements {9,424,554.551 1871,845.44!
Ending Cash Balance 5,443,946.29 5,855,1247.85
Pius: Outstanding Transactions 402,383.71 82,468.54
t.
Adjusted Cash Balance 5,446,334.00 5,9 8,766.44
TABLE II: SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
Interest Interest Interest
Name Amount Rate For Month Yr-to-Date
Orange County Investment Pool 5,325,786.21 9.14% 0.00 206,537.93
L.A.I.F. 4,2125.94 4.a5% 4.00 12,598.=$
Mid State Bank £15,391.38 2.75% 376.72 6,639.-'7
Petty Cash 925.92 N/A N/A N/A
TOTAL: 5,446,330.00 376.72 225,645.28
L.A.I.F. Interest paid quarterly in month following end of quarter.
Orange County Investment Pool Interest paid quarterly in 3rd month after quarter's end.
Interest Rate is for Current Month - not for earnings shown.
1 certify that this report reflects all Governmental Agency pooled
investments and is in conformity with the Investment Policy of the
City of Atascadero as stated in Resolution No. 126-92 dated 12108/42...
A copy of this Resolution is available at the Office of the City Clerk.
The Investment Program herein shown provides sufficient cash flow
liquidity to meet next month's estimated expenditures.
r
SIGNED: -- ,r
Muriel C. porta, City Treasurer
000009
REPORT TO COUNCIL
CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item: B-4
Through: Andy Takata, Assistant Meeting Date: 03/23/93
City Manager
File Number: TTM 02-90
From: Henry Engen, Community Development Director
SUBJECT•
Consideration of time extension -request for Tentative Tract Map
02-90 at 11145 El Camino Real (Richard Montanaro/North Coast
Engineering) .
RECOMMENDATION:
t
Per the Planning Commission' s recommendation, approval of� a time
extension to February' 12, 1994.
BACKGROUND:
On March 2, 1993, the Planning Commission reviewed the above-
referenced subject on its Consent Calendar. On a 7 : 0 vote, the
Commission recommended approval of a time extension for Tentative
Tract Map 02-90 to February 12, 1994 .
HE:ph
Attachment: Staff Report - March 2, 1993
cc: Richard Montanaro
North Coast Engineering
WOW,()
ITEM : A. 2
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: ?�'"Doug Davidson, Senior Planner
RE: Tentative Tract Map 02-90 - Montanaro/North Coast Eng.
DATE: March 2, 1993
The above referenced map was approved by the Planning Commission
on October 16, 1990 and subsequently approved by the City Council
on February 12, 1991. This final decision of February 12t1h was
rendered after two separate appeals had been heard on the project
- the first upheld an appeal of the Planning Commission denial of
the project; the second denied an appeal of having to comply with
Condition #1 (installation of separate water meters) .
As the applicant' s letter summarizes, there has been a continual
effort toward completion of the project. Indeed, much progress
has been made in satisfying the Conditions of Approval,
particularly with the installation of the individual water
meters. For this reason, the Tract Map should be extended for
one year.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of a one year time extension for
Tentative Tract Map 02-90 (Tract 1411) , extending the approval
date to February 12, 1994.
Attachments: 1. Request for Extension
2. Tract Map
3. Conditions of Approval
February 2, 1993
Mr . Doug Davidson
Community Development Dept .
City of Atascadero
6500 Palma Av.
Atascadero, CA 93422
Dear Mr. Davidson:
I am requesting a one-year extension to record Tentative Tract
Map 1411 . This extension is necessary for several reasons .
During the past two years I have invested more than $115 ;000
to meet the conditions of approval for Tract 1411. These funds
were spent on retrofitting the 64-unit project with separate
water supplies and individual water meters , landscape improve-
ments, swimming pool replastering, replacement fencing and exten-
sive irrigation repairs.
These improvements were funded by the sale of condominiums from
Tract 1429, located on Santa Ysabel Avenue in Atascadero. During
the past ten months the market for condominiums has collapsed,
and despite lowering prices by more than 25% I have not been able
to sell any condominiums . Due to the lack of sales , I do not
have the funding to complete the conversion at this time .
Additionally, I need more time to complete CCR' s for the project
that are acceptable to FHA and VA. While we have made progress
in this area, dealing with FHA and VA has proven to be very time
consuming. At the rate the CCR' s have progressed through these
agencies , it will be at least another six months before Tract 1411
is approved for funding through FHA and VA.
When the economy improves I plan to complete the conversion and
sale of Tract 1411 as soon as possible .
Thank you for your understanding in these difficult times .
Yours truly,
Richard J. Montanaro
.� 330
� 3913`
3183
i
EXHIBIT B - Conditions of Approval
40Tentative Tract Map 02-90
11145 El Camino Real (Montanaro/North Coast Engineering)
Revised by the Planning Commission October 16, 1990
f
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1. Separate water meters for each unit shall be established
prior to the recording of the final map.
2. All existing and proposed utility easements, pipelines, and
other easements are to be shown on the final map. If there
are building or other restrictions related to the easements,
they shall be noted on the final map. The open space lots
shall be designated as Public Utility Easements.
3. The applicant shall establish Covenants, Conditions, and. z
Restrictions (CC&Rs) for the regulation of land use, controt
of nuisances, and architectural control of the site and the
building(s) .
a. These CC&Rs shall be submitted for review and approval
by the City Attorney and the Community Development
Director prior to the approval of the final map.
b. These CC&Rs shall be administered by a Condominium
Owners Association.
4. A soils report or an Engineer' s certification stating that
existing soils on the site are adequate to support the
proposed structure as per Chapter 70, subsection (e) of the
Uniform Building Code shall be provided prior to the
recording of the final map.
5. A complete site landscaping plan, prepared by a registered
landscape architect, shall be submitted for review and
approval by the Community Development and Public Works
Departments prior to recording of the map. The landscape
plan shall address the street frontages of the property,
both E1 Camino Real and Viejo Camino, particulary the
drainage and erosion problems at those locations. Landscape
plan shall also address any unlandscaped areas and focus on
providing foundation planting along the base of all
buildings. The landscaping shall be corrected, or the
equivalent bond/guarantee posted, to the satisfaction of the
Community Development Department and City Engineer prior to
recording the map.
6. A final map, in compliance with all conditions set forth
herein, shall be submitted for review and approval in
is accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City Lot
Division Ordinance prior to recordation.
00001
a. Monuments shall be set at all new property corners
by a Registered Civil Engineer or- Licensed Land
Surveyor as required the Land Surveyors Act and the
Subdivision Map AcCt. Monuments set within any road
right-of-way shall conform to City standard M-1.
b. Pursuant to Section 66497 of the Subdivision Map Act,
the enginner or surveyor shall notice the City Engineer
in writing that the monuments have been set.
C. A recently updated preliminary title report shall be
submitted for review in conjunction with the processing
of the final map.
d. A preliminary subdivision guarantee shall be submitter
for review in conjunction with the processing of the
final map.
7. Approval of this tentative map .shall expire two years from
the date of final approval unless an extension of time is
granted pursuant to a written request prior to the
expiration date.
8. All trash containers shall be enclosed per City Ordinance.
(3000? r 1
.r
REPORT TO COUNCIL
CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item: B-5
Through: Andy Takata, Assistant Meeting Date: 03/23/93
City Manager
File Number: TPM 27-90
From: Henry Engen Community Development Director NC,
SUBJECT:
Consideration of time extension -request for Tentative Parcel Map
27-90 located at Lot 3, Pine Mountain Park of Atascadero (Noakes/
RRM Design Group) .
RECOMMENDATION:
Per the Planning Commission' s recommendation, approval of* a time
extension to February' 12, 1994 .
BACKGROUND:
On March 2, 1993, the Planning Commission reviewed the above-
referenced subject on its Consent Calendar. On a 7 :0 vote, the
fCommission recommended approval of a time extension for Tentative
Parcel Map 27-90 to February 12, 1994 in accordance with the
Revised Conditions of Approval contained in the ;attached staff
report.
HE:ph
Attachment: Staff Report - March 2, 1993
cc: David and Brenda Noakes
RRM Design Group
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Gary Kaiser, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Time Extension Request -- Tentative Parcel Map #27-90
DATE: March 2, 1993
RECOMMENDATION•
Staff recommends the requested one-year time extension for
Tentative Parcel Map #27-90 be approved subject to the revised
Conditions of Approval contained in Attachment A.
DISCUSSION• =}
Tentative Parcel Map #27-90 was approved by the Planning P
Commission and City Council on January 15, 1991 and February 12,
1991, respectively (Attachment B) .
The approved tentative map allows the clustering of four (4 )
single family lots on flatter portions of the site along Cortez
Avenue. In exchange for the four new residential parcels, a
"remainder" parcel of 17. 32 acres (southeast face of Pine
Mountain) is to be dedicated to the City for parkland/open space
use.
During review of the tentative map, a preliminary grading and
drainage plan was prepared to show the effects of developing the
four residential parcels in light of site -constraints related
topography, tree coverage and utility easements. Building sites
and driveway configurations shown on this preliminary grading
plan represented the most site-sensitive development scheme
conceivable for the project. Only one small native tree would
have to be removed for buildout of the entire project and overall
grading required for the project would be less than extensive.
It was perhaps on oversight on behalf of the planning staff to
not recommend that designated building sites, in accordance with
those shown on the preliminary grading plan, be shown on the
final map; other building site locations/driveway configurations
could result in additional (and in fact excessive) site
disturbance. Staff sees this extension request as an opportunity
to add such a condition, thereby "capping" site disturbance at an
acceptable level.
Attachments: Revised Conditions of Approval
Original staff report
(Revised at 3/2/93 hearing)
0 1 1^1
ATTACHMENT A -- Revised Conditions of Approval
Tentative Parcel Map #27-90
Lot 3, Pine Mountain Park of Atascadero
(Noakes/RRM Design Group)
March 2, 1993
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. Water shall be obtained from the Atascadero Mutual Water
Company. Water lines, electric power, gas, telephone, and
cable television services shall be stubbed to the right-of-way
line of each lot, and all facilities to distribute such
services shall be provided according to the requirements of
the responsible utility companies. All of the ,aforementioned
utilities shall be installed underground, and shall be
installed prior to the paving of the Cortez Avenue extension
(to each lot) . -}
2. All existing utility, pipeline, open space, or other`eabements
are to be shown on the final Parcel Map. If there are
building or other restrictions related to the easements, they
shall be noted on the final Parcel Map.
3. All relocation and/or alteration of existing utility lines
shall be the responsibility of the developer. '
4 . The subdivider shall offer for dedication to the Public Public
Utility Easements at the following locations:
a. Six (6 ) feet along the street frontage of each lot
(parcels 1 through 4 ) .
b. Five (5) feet on both sides of any existing PG&E
facilities to remain in place.
5. A grading and drainage plan prepared by a registered civil
engineer shall be submitted to the Community Development
Department for review and approval by the Community
Development and Public Works Departments, prior to the
issuance each building permit. Said grading and drainage
plans shall include substantial evidence to verify that no
additional surface water will flow onto properties to the
south.
6 . An encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City of
Atascadero Public Works Department prior to the commencement
of public improvement construction, and an inspection
agreement shall be signed guaranteeing that the work will be
done and the inspections will be paid for.
7 . The subdivider shall install all street signs, traffic
delineation devices, warning and regulatory signs, gaurdrails,
barricades, and other similar devices where required by the
Director of Public Works. Signs shall be in conformance with
the current State of California uniform sign chart.
Installation of traffic devices shall be subject to review and
modifications after constructions.
8. The subdivider shall extend Cortez Avenue from Maleza Avenue
to the northeasterly property line of Parcel 4, as designed by
Cuesta Engineering ( 1989 ) . A City Standard cul-de-sac shall
be installed at the terminus of --the road improvement.
9. Construction of the public road improvements shall be
completed prior to the recordation of the final Parcel Map.
10. All public improvements shall be covered with a 100%
Performance Guarantee and a 100% Labor and Material Guarantee
until construction is deemed substantially complete, and by a
10% Maintenance Guarantee to remain in effect until one ( 1)
year after substantial completion.
t
11. Offer to dedicate to the City of Atascadero the 'fo'llowing
right-of-way:
Street Name: Cortez Avenue
Limits: Any right-of-way necessary for the construction
of Cortez Avenue inclusive of all slopes, shoulders, and
public utilities.
12 . Offer to dedicate to the City of Atascadero the entire
"remainder" parcel, as proposed.
13. The subdivider shall be responsible for the installation of a
new fire hydrant, and associated water lines, where the
proposed common access meets the proposed Cortez Avenue
extension, or as approved by the City.Fire Marshall. All fire
hydrant improvements shall be installed, to the approval of
the City Fire Marshall, prior to the recordation of the final
Parcel Map.
14. Building permits shall be applied for, approved, and a final
inspection shall be received for each lot. At that time, each
of the septic/leachfield systems shall be individually
approved. Any changes deemed necessary, including but not
limited to the re-orientation of the leachfields and expansion
areas to follow the contours of the natural topography, shall
be implemented. This condition need not be met prior to the
recordation of the final Parcel Map.
15. Two (2 ) Oak trees, in at least 15-gallon containers, shall be
planted on the project site to serve as replacements for the
one ( 1) 4-inch Oak proposed to be removed (these replacement
trees are shown on the tentative parcel map) . The tree to be
removed shall remain until the building permit necessitating
its removal is issued. The replacement trees, then, shall be
planted prior to the final inspection pursuant to that permit.
16 . A final Parcel Map, in substantial conformance with the
approved tentative map and in compliance with all conditions
set forth herein, shall be submitted for review and approval
in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City' s
Subdivision Ordinance prior to the recording of the final
Parcel map.
a. Monuments shall be set at all new property corners by a
Registered Civil Engineer or Licensed Land Surveyor, as
required by the Land Surveyors Act and Subdivision Map
Act. Monuments set within any road right-of-way shall
conform to City Standard Drawing M-1.
b. Pursuant to Section 66497 of the Subdivision Map Act, the
engineer or surveyor shall notice the City Engineer in
writing that the monuments have been set.
C. A recently updated preliminary title report s4all be
submitted for review in conjunction with the prok,-essing
of the final Parcel map.
d. A preliminary subdivision guarantee shall be submitted
for review in conjunction with the processing of the
final Parcel map.
e. Offers of dedication shall be completed and recorded
prior to, or simultaneously with, the recordation of the
final Parcel Map.
17. Approval of this tentative map shall expire two (2) years from
the date of final approval, unless an extension of time is
granted pursuant to a written request received prior to the
expiration date.
18. Designated building sites shall be shown on the final map in
locations substantially consistent with those shown on the
preliminary grading plan prepared by RRM Design group dated
October 20, 1990 (Exhibit D of 1/15/91 staff report) . Access
to each of the designated building sites, including a common
driveway serving proposed parcels 2 and 3, shall also be in
substantial conformance with said preliminary grading plan.
TPM-27-90.co2
(,F0ii ;''��
ATTACHMENT B
1/ 15/91 staff report
TPM #27-90 ( time ext . #2
CITY OF ATASCADERO
STAFF REPORT
FOR: Planning Commission Meeting Date: January 15 , 1991
BY: Gary V. Kaiser, Assistant Planner File No: TPM 27-90
SUBJECT:
-Consideration of a proposed zone change to amend the existing LS
(Special Recreation) zoning to include a PD7 (Planned Development
No. 7) Overlay zone. An associated tentative parcel map
application proposes to divide a 21. 66 acre parcel into four (4)
parcels for single-family residential use, and a "remainder"
parcel of approximately 17. 3 acres to be offered for dedication
to the City of Atascadero for parkland/open space use.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of Zone Change #05-90 based on the
Findings contained in the Draft Ordinance (Exhibit I) . Likewise,
staff recommends approval of Tentative Parcel Map $27-90 based on
I Findings for Approval contained in Exhibit G and the
Conditions of Approval contained in Exhibit H.
A. SITUATION AND FACTS:
1. Applicant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .David and Brenda Noakes
2. Representative. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RRM Design Group
3. Project Address. . . . . . . . . . . . . .Cortez Avenue extension
4. Legal Description. . . . . . . . . . . .Lot 3, Pine Mtn. Park
Book 4 O.R. Page 76
5. Site Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21. 66 acres
6. Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .LS (Special Recreation)
7 . General Plan Designation. . . . .Special Recreation
8. Existing Use. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Vacant
9 . Environmental Status. . . . . . . . .Negative Declaration
posted December 21 , 1990
B. ANALYSIS:
iThe applicant requests approval of a tentative parcel map
application to divide a 21. 66 acre parcel into: "parcel 1" of 0 . 5
acres; "parcel 2" of 1 . 74 acres; "parcel 3" of 1. 6 nacres; "parcel
4" of 0. 5 acres; and a "remainder" parcel of 17 . 32 ';acres (Exhibit
B) . Parcels 1 through 4 would be for single-family residential
use, while the "remainder" parcel would be offered for dedication
to the City of Atascadero for parkland/open space use. The
project site is located on the southeast side of Pine Mountain,
and would be served by a northerly extension of Cortez Avenue
(see Exhibit A) .
A preliminary grading and drainage plan has been received, which
was prepared by a registered civil engineer (Exhibit C) . The
plan shows that access to each building site can be established
without extensive amounts of grading and site disturbance.
Proposed parcels 2 and 3 would share a common driveway to further
minimize grading. According to the plan, one (1) small naive
tree would have to be removed to allow for the constructioi of
this common driveway (a 4" Oak) . This is not considered a
significant adverse impact, as the current Tree Ordinance will
require the applicant to replace this tree at a two'-to-one ratio
(see condition of approval #15) . A certified arborist has
prepared a tree protection plan, as reflected on the grading and
drainage plan, and has verified that all remaining trees on the
site can be retained.
• Minimum Lot Size/Density
The City General Plan (page 53) establishes a minimum lot size of
one-half acre for the creation of new single-family residential
parcels. The City Zoning Ordinance (Section 9-3. 41,4) , however,
sets a minimum lot size of 1. 5 acres in the Special', Recreation
Zone, where single-family residential use is proposed without
benefit of sewer services. The intent of this 1. 5 'acre minimum
is to preclude the possible adverse effects associated with too
many individual septic/leachfield systems on a region. That is,
the 1. 5 acre minimum acts to regulate the overall density of
residential uses over a given area, rather than to determine what
the size of each individual lot should be. The overall
residential density of the project area would be approximately
5. 5 acres per single-family unit, if the current proposal for
four (4) single-family residential lots is approved.
The Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board (CCRWQCB)
has reviewed this project and has determined that the project as
proposed would have no significant adverse effects related to the
individual septic/leachfield systems. Moreover, percolation
tests performed by Tierra Tech. Testing Labs, Inc. indicate that
soils are not only capable of supporting, but well-suited for,
individual septic/leachfield systems.
2
0000"2
Planned Development Overlay Zone
Since two of the proposed parcel sizes are smaller than that .
allowed under the existing zoning (at least for single-family
residential use) , approval of this project hinges on the
establishment of the PD Overlay Zone. The City has created a
generic overlay zone (PD7) conceived precisely for residential
subdivisions such as the one currently proposed.
The purpose of the Planned Development Overlay Zones, and the
findings that must be made to approve the establishment of a
Planned Development Overlay Zone, are contained within the Zoning
Ordinance. The purpose of the PD Zones, as found in Section 9-
3. 641 of the City Zoning Ordinance, is as follows:
"The Planned Development Overlay Zone identifies areas where
development standards or processing requirements different
from those established by the underlying zoning district are
deemed necessary to promote orderly and harmonious -�
development and to enhance the opportunity to best ut4ilize
special characteristics-- of an area. " P
Pursuant to Section 9-3 . 644 of the City Zoning Ordinance, the
following findings must be made to approve the establishment of a
PD Overlay Zone:
1 . Modification of development standards or processing
requirements is warranted to promote orderly and harmonious
development.
2. Modification of development standards or processing
requirements will enhance the opportunity to best utilize
special characteristics of an area and will have a
beneficial effect on the area.
3 . Benefits derived from the overlay zone cannot be reasonably
achieved through existing development standards or
processing requirements.
4. The proposed plans offer certain redeeming features to
compensate for the requested modifications.
It is clear that the development standards that can be modified
during the planned development process include minimum lot sizes.
In fact, a zone change would not be necessary were it not for the
two proposed lots containing less than 1. 5 acres. Staff feels
that all of the above mandatory findings for the establishment of
a Planned Development Overlay zone can be made, and that this
project achieves the purpose and intent of the planned
development philosophy. Staff agrees with the applicant that the
preservation of the "remainder" parcel, which comprises 88% of
the project site, as open space would be a great benefit to the
3
entire City, both from an aesthetic as well as recreational
perspective. The developer ' s statement is contained in Exhibit
D.
Furthermore, staff feels that nothing would be gained by
requiring the redesign of this project so that each of the
proposed lots contains at least 1. 5 acres. Such a 'requirement
would (1) have no effect on the overall residential density of
the site, (2) would not increase the "usable" area ,assigned to
the two smaller lots due to steepness_ of slope, and (3) would
result in less acreage available for the City and the community
in general to use and enjoy as open space.
Recently Approved Projects in the Area
Two other tentative parcel maps have recently been approved in
the immediate vicinity of this project that may be of interest to
the Commission. First, on July 11 , 1989, the City ,Council
concurred with the recommendation of the Planning Commission to
approve Tentative Parcel Map #04-89 (Larson) . Also, on -_Ociober
30 , 1989 the Council concurred with the Commission to approve
Tentative Parcel Map #17-89 (Barrett) . The Larson project is
located directly across the (future) street from the project
currently being considered, and the Barrett project is located
immediately south of the Larson project. Reduced copies of each
of these approved tentative maps are attached as Exhibits E & F.
The construction of that portion of Cortez Avenue that would
serve the project currently being considered was required per
conditions of approval of both of the aforementioned other
tentative maps. Having no guarantee that the proponents of these
other projects will actually proceed to construct the road, meet
any other applicable conditions, and record a final Parcel Map,
the City must condition the current tentat-ive map on the
construction of the same road. The proponents of this project
have included the construction of Cortez Avenue into the current
project proposal. Potential environmental impacts associated
with the construction of that road, however, have been addressed
during review of these other projects. The recent review of the
current application by the City Public Works Department is
reflected in the attached Conditions of Approval (Exhibit H) .
CONCLUSIONS:
Staff believes that the necessary findings can be made for the
establishment of a Planned Development Overlay Zone. In fact,
staff feels that this project symbolizes the intent of the
planned development philosophy by offering benefits to the City,
and to the community in general, that would not likely be
realized under the current zoning. Likewise, staff believes that
the necessary Map findings can be made for approval of the
tentative parcel map, as conditioned herein.
4
ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A - Location/Zoning Map
Exhibit B - General Plan Map
Exhibit C - Tentative Parcel Map
Exhibit D - Grading and Drainage Plan
Exhibit E - Developer' s Statement
Exhibit F - Larson Map
Exhibit G - Barrett Map
Exhibit H - Findings for Approval
Exhibit I - Conditions of Approval
Exhibit J - Draft Ordinance
t
TPM-27-90.sr
5
0U0E3";;
CITY O F ATAS CAD ERO
EXHIBIT A
--,,, CO�LI�IL�iITY DEVELOPMENTr
LOCATION MAP
D EF RTMENT TPM427-90
i P
e(FH) SYCAMO51TI- % =
A
v
♦ r qM
� w �`I, 1 `�'P�\ rr >►vE I � � � it
"• r DIN► I I I I `:� � !. /Q.
(FH)
-- � R,� QPM �vpL�E., ,` `. i I l,�l _ ►vE-�
\\ 1 _�-e ALLE VF
it
� t F
1 FHr �OF
ki
- v- -/ �i ✓"°� ` \\�'
` - r ( �"
i
MR
OAF WRAP
_ . fas
.. �
go
�� t
CITY OF ATASCADERO
EXHIBIT C
CO1�titiiU�iITY DEVELOPMENT TENT. PARCEL MAP
TPM #27-90
D EP_A.RTN ENT
SITE :.::.
1, p Y
�,vt ,N�xAv
^ �� // (II 1�i II� \1 1 ( YC=: • � �u.rKM�wor..-4�..�r_c�r�L�
_e
'I.i t1.�11�`1\\\\yT\\\I�I�I��'1,` l 1• it] � o-w6RM �N
OPEN S.ACL%RGMAINOf.,)t,
'Itk RC[L] /'�. w\� ' �.•— -. r- L
.ARCw=j TENTATIVE
PARCEL MAP AT 90 — 285
1. �..
PIi4L MOUNTAIN -
ATASCADERO. CALIFORNIA
`\\ OCTOBER?O.=990-
06)00 11f•d
CITY OF ATASCADERO
EXHIBIT D
COWNIUNITY DEVELOPMEN GRADING/DRAINAGE
DEPARTMENT TPM #27-90
a . .
0.
co
1�t \ a ! ♦I i ST!••T lICTION
a.+ � / r^_. / ''y- \/�'„ter- � •....r....N.......t,..b..
Y` S`f �, n,- �L �'t•• �' .. •'•(/� �,\'3 1. t ��ty, r�.[ww�.�ia.rwrr.ti f
Vi
l 't... r! i •.
••'.esa' rase a,..
"� ��_ .�� \^"� � '. -�� I .,.. �......r.:,.`, fie•.\ �a-.
. , � �• J,'�y�-� .•_ � .� i, �__� is
voiaxtacxr'suxvt�rs .-�� t-----'-i � �`�� � ,' I• `r x_ _
✓ —
BENCH MARK
00Os`�° <�
CITY O F RTAS CAD ERO
EXHIBIT E
:.,,7 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPER' S STATEMENT
DERAR TMENT TPM #27-90
•
110V I IL IJ53
PINE MOUNTAIN
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY STATE11�Ig,�I'Ve W uta EtOPMEN?
A PD Overlay Zone is requested for this property to adjust lot size standards resulting in
single family lots which wi11 minimize development efforts on this steep vacant site.
The existing zoning, Special Recreation (LS) requires a. 1.5 acre minimum parcel gaze for
single family residential parcels utilizing individual septic systems. The proposed tdhtative '
map shows lots which range from 0.5 acre to 1.7 acres in size.
Due to the sloping terrain of this property, creating four home sites with access and area
for septic systems would be difficult to achieve within the minimum, lot requirements.
However, as the project is outside the sewer services district, septic systems will be
required. i
I
The proposed clustering of lots on the less steep slopes of the 21+ acres will be consistent
in size and layout with the adjoining single family residential neighborhood. A reduced lot
size on the subject property will be in keeping with the smaller lot sizes existing in this j
area and preserve a large area (17+ acres) as open space. Adequate leachfield disposal
area can be provided based on percolation tests completed. A common driveway will serve
two lots (Parcels 2 and 3), minimizing grading for driveways to these lets.
The remainder lot, comprised of slopes 30% and over, will be protected as open space
conserving the existing viewshed thereby being a benefit to the neighborhood and the
entire City.
I
i
I
I
s
p/hp-pine.pdo
(I004)::(3
CITY OF ATASCADERO
EYHIBIT F
COWNfUNITY DEVELOPMENT MSON MAP
TP
DEPARTMENT TPM #27-90
Ad
• S.t r..wrwr y,.tr ra'..wraa.eao
Zb .
/ri.wv if.ew-
rcrr•—.w .,.a.. ett•�i/ AfAr ers9-I/3
T?�"
OJ✓NG.0 3 LErCfIl/Glt �`.,.:w..�....��...:••::•
r.ere.r..-a.avr..r.aaw.a r a+r r.w.Mrra
v�.+
n wv s.swrrr•
Mr•��. /&Gfrr 4AA0lq!19/N4
1�"iww+nwv F,2i..nw w .a..n w
.rwrrr. c.a..�.....a.at
• .• aawa....wr
0000,11
CITY OF ATASCADERO
EXHIBIT G
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BARRETT MAP
• DEPARTMENT TPM #27-90
�;"•' 0
• M 4
F-ta N.
L7-p'el leo,
x f t
ij
,S
1}Krirt�
1 � LUT il
T-
'I
Aj
GTYOFATASCADERO•CA.$9
Zr.0�.w� wrieus•n H
..Y~f
_ 1.M tr VwN Aa �i.�L7Y�.4� as."
a_
1��ti
EXHIBIT H - Findings for Approval
Tentative Parcel Map 27-90
Lot 3 , Pine Mountain Park 0
(Noakes/RRM Design Group)
January 15, 1991
ENVIRONMENTAL FINDING:
The proposed project will not have a significant impact on the
environment.. The Negative Declaration prepared for the project
is adequate.
MAP FINDINGS:
1. The proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable
General and Specific Plans. -4
t
2. The design and/or improvement of the proposed subdivision is
consistent with applicable General and Specific Plans.
3 . The site is physically suitable for the type of development
proposed.
4. The site is physically suitable for the density of the
development proposed.
5. The design of the subdivision, and/or the proposed
improvements, will not cause substantial environmental
damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish and
wildlife or their habitat.
6. The design of the subdivision, and the type of the
improvements, will not conflict with easements acquired by
the public at large for access through or the use of
property within the proposed subdivision; or substantially
equivalent alternate easements are provided.
7 . The proposed subdivision design, and/or the type of
improvements proposed, will not cause serious public health
problems.
TPM-27-90 . fin
EXHIBIT I -- Conditio.►s of Approval
Tentative Parcel Map #27-90
Lot 3 , Pine Mountain Park of Atascadero
(Noakes/RRM Design Group)
January 15 , 1991 - REVISED BY PLANNING COMMISSION 1/ 15/91
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1 . Water shall be obtained from the Atascadero Mutual Water
Company. Water lines, electric power, gas, telephone, and
cable television services shall be stubbed to the right-of-
way line of each lot, and all facilities to distribute such
services shall be provided according to the requirements of
the responsible utility companies. All of the
aforementioned utilities shall be installed underground, and
shall be installed prior to the paving of the Cortez Avenue
extension (to each lot) .
2. All existing utility; pipeline, open space, or other
easements are to be shown on the final Parcel Map. If there
are building or- other restrictions related to the easeiAents,
they shall be noted on the final Parcel Map.
3 . All relocation and/or alteration of existing utility lines
shall be the responsibility of the developer.
4 . The subdivider shall offer for dedication to the Public
Public Utility Easements at the following locations:
a. Six (6) feet along the street frontage of each lot
(parcels 1 through 4) .
b. Five (5) feet on both sides of any existing PG&E
facilities to remain in place.
5 . A grading and drainage plan prepared by a registered civil
engineer shall be submitted to the Community Development
Department for review and approval by the Community
Development and Public Works Departments , prior to the
issuance each building permit. Said grading and drainage
plans shall include substantial evidence to verify that no
additional surface water will flow onto properties to the
south.
6 . An encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City of
Atascadero Public Works Department prior to the commencement
of public improvement construction, and an inspection
agreement shall be signed guaranteeing that the work will be
done and the inspections will be paid for.
7 . The subdivider shall install all street signs, traffic
delineation devices , warning and regulatory signs ,
gaurdrails , barricades, and other similar devices where
required by the Director of Public Works . Signs shall be in
0O00'z.�
i
conformance wits_ the current State of Califu. nia uniform
sign chart. Installation of traffic devices shall be
subject to review and modifications after constructions.
8 . The subdivider shall extend Cortez Avenue from Maleza Avenue
to the northeasterly property line of Parcel 4, as designed
by Cuesta Engineering (1989) . A City Standard cul-de-sac
shall be installed at the terminus of the road improvement.
9 . Construction of the public road improvements shall be
completed prior to the recordation of the final Parcel Map.
10 . All public improvements shall be covered with a 100%
Performance Guarantee and a 100% Labor and Material.
Guarantee until construction is deemed substantially
complete, and by a 10% Maintenance Guarantee to remain in
effect until one (1) year after substantial completion.
11. Offer to dedicate to .the City of Atascadero the following
right-of-way:
Street Name: Cortez Avenue -�
Limits : Any right-of-way necessary for the
construction of Cortez Avenue inclusive of all sloypes,
shoulders , and public utilities.
12. Offer to dedicate to the City of Atascadero the entire
"remainder" parcel, as proposed.
13 . The subdivider shall be responsible for the installation of
a new fire hydrant, and associated water lines, where the
proposed common access meets the proposed Cortez Avenue
extension, or as approved by the City Fire Marshall. All
fire hydrant improvements shall be installed, to the
approval of the City Fire Marshall, prior to the recordation
of the final Parcel Map.
14. Building permits shall be applied for, approved, and a final
inspection shall be received for each lot. At that time,
each of the septic/leachfield systems shall be individually
approved. Any changes deemed necessary, including but not
limited to the re-orientation of the leachfields and
expansion areas to follow the contours of the natural
topography, shall be implemented. This condition need not
be met prior to the recordation of the final. Parcel Map.
15 . Two (2) Oak trees , in at least 15-gallon containers , shall
be planted on the project site to serve as replacements for
the one (1) 4-inch Oak proposed to be removed (these
replacement trees are shown on the tentative parcel map) .
The tree to be removed shall remain until the building
permit necessitating its removal is issued. The replacement
trees , then, shall be planted prior to the final inspection
pursuant to that permit.
011()0"<<,
16 . A final Parcel Map, in substantial conformance with the
approved tentative map and in compliance with all conditions
set forth herein, shall be submitted for review and approval
in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City ' s
Subdivision Ordinance prior to the recording of the final
Parcel map.
a. Monuments shall be set at all new property corners by a
Registered Civil Engineer or Licensed Land ,Surveyor, as
required by the Land Surveyors Act and Subdivision Map
Act. Monuments set within any road right-of-way shall
conform to City Standard Drawing M-1.
b. Pursuant to Section 66497 of the Subdivision Map Act,
the engineer or surveyor shall notice the City Engineer
in writing that the monuments have been set.
C. A recently updated preliminary title report shall be
submitted for review in conjunction with the processing
of the final Parcel map.
_F
d. A preliminary subdivision guarantee shall be submitted
for review in conjunction with the processing of t�e
final Parcel map.
e. Offers of dedication shall be completed and recorded
prior to, or simultaneously with, the recordation of
the final Parcel Map.
11 . Approval of this tentative map shall expire two (2) _years
from the date of final approval, unless an extension of time
is granted pursuant to a written request received prior to
the expiration date.
TPM-27-90.con
•
EXHIBIT J
DRAFT ORDINANCE
TP11 1 427-90
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RTASCRDERO
AMENDING MAP 7 OF THSF 0FFICIAL ZONING
MAPS BY REZONING THAT CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS LOT 3 ,
PINE MOUNTAIN 76 PARK OF ATASCADERO, RECORDED IN BOOK 4 AT PAGE ,
SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY OFFICIAL RECORDS, FROM LS TO LS (PD7)
(ZC 05-90 : NOAKES/RRM DESIGN GROUP)
WHEREAS , the proposed zoning map amendments are consistent
with the General Plan as required by Section 65860 of the
California Government Code; and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendments are in conformance with
Section 65800 et seq. of the California Government Code
concerning zoning regulations; and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendments will not have a significant
adverse impact upon the environment. The Negative Declazation
prepared for the project is adequate; and
WHEREAS, the Atascadero Planning Commission held a public
hearing on January 15 , 1991 and has recommended approval of Zone
Change 05-90 .
NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Atascadero does
ordain as follows :
Section 1. Council Findings.
1. The proposal is compatible with the surrounding land
use and zoning.
2. The proposal is consistent with the General Plan
land use element.
3. The proposal will not result in any significant adverse
environmental impacts. The Negative Declaration
prepared for the project is adequate.
4. Modification of development standards or processing
requirements is warranted to promote orderly and
harmonious development.
5. Modification of development standards or processing
requirements will enhance the opportunity to best
utilize special characteristics of an area and will
have a beneficial effect on the area.
6. Benefits derived from the overlay zone cannot be
reasonably achieved through existing development
standards or processing requirements.
Ordinance No.
7. The proposed plans offer certain redeeming features to
compensate for requested modifications.
Section 2. Zoning Map.
Map number 7 of the Official Zoning Maps of the City of
Atascadero on file in the City Community Development Department
is hereby amended to reclassify the parcel listed below as and
shown on the attached Exhibit A which are hereby made a part of
this ordinance by reference.
Lot 3, Pine Mountain Park of Atascadero, recorded in
Official Records in Book 4 at Page 76, County of San
Luis Obispo, State of California. IF
z
Section 3 . Publication.
The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be; published
once within fifteen (15) days after its passage in the Atascadero
News , a newspaper of general circulation, printed, published, and
circulated in the City in accordance with Section 36933 of the
Government Code; shall certify the adopting and posting of this
ordinance and shall cause this ordinance and this certification
together with proof of posting to be entered into the Book of
Ordinances of the City.
Section 4. Effective Date.
This ordinance shall go into effect and be in full force and
effect at 12: 01 a.m. on the 31st day after its passage.
On motion by and seconded by
, the foregoing Ordinance is approved
by the following roll call vote:
AYES :
NOES:
ABSENT:
DATE ADOPTED:
By:
ROBERT LILLEY, Mayor
City of Atascadero, California
ATTEST:
LEE DAYKA, City Clerk
RAY WINDSOR, City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ARTHER R. MONTANDON, City Attorney
PREPARED BY:
r
HENRY ENGEN, Community Development Director
0000,19
01 OF ATASCADERO
EXHIBIT A
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ZONING MAP
D EPARTMENT ZONE CHANGE 4705-90
sQC N
e(FH) TKAI,O — S I
FH)
S O / 6—
O W b
J
J
-R M r 16
R 1(
y — b- s �• ,,a ,
--� All
'4 RNP4
(FH
'�• ��� A i � � 1 ' I 4i— i 1 J t� `�
F t �}
�.
� r `r r _
Ave 0
to14
GR
o '�6_ (P 3 RMFu CF N ► \ I� ,
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item3: B-6
CITY OF ATASCADERO
Through: Andy Takata, Ass't. City Manager Meeting Date: 3/23/93
From: Mark Joseph, Administrative Services Director
SUBJECT: Initiate TRAN financing for FY 93-94.
RECOMMENDATION: By motion, to direct staff to submit the
application to participate in the League' s TRAN program.
BACKGROUND:
The City sold its first Tax and Revenue Anticipation Note
(TRAN) in November, 1992, for FY 92-93. Council directed staff
to explore pooling with other Cities for the FY 93-94 TRANt When
the League of Cities announced its Statewide Pool, staff attended
the informational meeting in San Luis Obispo on February 25.
ANALYSIS
The attached brochure highlights the League' s program,
including the one-page application. The additional', two charts
set forth the projected costs of issuance and advantages of
single issue vs. pooled issues. The advantages of pooling are
significant: the costs for a $2 million TRAN are projected
between $12,700 and $13, 800; the City's FY 92-93 costs were
$22,300. The League' s program includes a reserve fund that
should assure us the highest credit rating and lowest interest
rates; the application and approval process is considerably
easier than the single-issue approach taken in FY 92-93.
OPTIONS:
-
1. Participate in the League' s TRAN pool - The reasons are
cited above.
2 . Participate in some other pooled program - Although
advantageous, most cities in the area are likely to
participate in the League' s program, if they are going to
participate at all.
3 . Pursue a single issue TRAN - This would involve more staff
time and the costs of issuance would be higher,.
4 . Do not pursue a TRAN - Given the City' s cash flow and the
likelihood of interest earnings from the TRAN, this is not
recommended.
FISCAL IMPACT•
Assuming a $2 million TRAN, the projected expenses and
interest earnings under the League' s program are as follows:
Lowest Highest
Costs Costs
Issuance Costs $12,700 $13, 800
Interest Expense
(2. 85%-3. 00%) 57, 000 60, 000
Total Costs $69,700 $73, 800
Interest Earnings
(7 . 00%-7 .750) 155, 000 140, 000
Net Earnings 85,300 66,200
- t
The actual interest earnings will be reduced to some Axtent
based on 1) the actual TRAN size; 2) the actual interest rates
for the period, and 3) the available cash balances during the 12
months of the issue (i.e. , a portion of the $2 million will be
used to pay City expenses during the first five months. As the
balance drops, interest earnings will drop as well) . Overall,
interest earnings are expected to exceed expenses.
a:tran
#13A
0t)00-i
i
i
I
i
I
T�x .ANDR !• . � I
i
FiNANCING PROGRAM
i
i
i
A CALIFORNIA STATEWIDE
CASH FLOW FINANCING PROGRAM
i
NF
I
O . ANDAPPLICAnON
I
I
Sponsored by:
i
California State League of
Association of Counties California Cities
i
OFFERED THROUGH:
i
CALIFORNIA STATEWIDE
COMMUNITIES DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
i
j P�
i
t vIt
providing low cost financirz`y,/or
I
California Local Governments
I,
i
i
i
I
i
i
AX incl Revenue Anticipa- The chart provided helow (Jce to assist California conununitieS with i
tion Notes (TRANS) are h'i,«re.9 i demonstrttes possible rev- tinancin, programs. The advantage,
short term obligations enue benefits for a S5 million TRAM of CSCDA pooled TRANS Program are:
( l2-I3 months) issued by horrower based on an assumed bor-
I localgovernments to provide funds ro rowing rate of 2.50qii. 520.000 Cost of • Reduced issuance expenses he-
meet projected cash flow deficits. The Issuance and a 4.501)i) reinvestment cause expenses are shared.
i
amount of TRANS issued by a local rate. • The ability to attain the highest
government is based on monthiv cash short term credit rating availahie j
Row projections for the fiscal year. through the;oint Powers AUthOr-
"IR:',Ns must he issued in accordance CSCDA TRAIIIs Program itv issuing stricture.
j with established state and federal regu- • Increasedlnarlket access resulting l
lations. The benefits of TRANS are: The Citlifornia State Association of in lower intercRt cost.
-Counties and the Leat*ue of California - Effective and efficient
standard-Provide cash during periods of Cities have joined together to provide ized documentation and credit
i
cash shortfalls. a Pooled Tax and Revenue Anticipa- criteria.
• Increase cash balances availahie tion Note Program for California Cont- • Streamlined issuance process re
rot investment. munibes. The program is being of- Suiting in less work-for the puNic
Rates JYe to 4"O fered through the California Statewide agency.
)eiow available reinvestment COmnwnities Development Author-
rate,. itv.a ioint no,,vers authority established
• The difference between the I-
)01--roving rate and the reinvestment
rate tarhara�-(2) can he retained.
i Fr�ure.i �
Breakdown of Earnings (*)
Sj Million T RAN
(Monies horrotced at?.Ski)and invested at 4.3°ioi
Net Gain to Issuer
$80,000
j
Cost of Issuance
Earnings $20,000 I
$225,000
i
Interest Expense
I $125,000
I*': Suoiect to marker rotes
I
i
i
How • • ' {
Determining TRAINS issu:wcr elate (usu:iily luly 1). plug (n :unlrhharv, the maximum siring
Borrowing Amount monthly revenues- IeSS nl.ontlrly ex- of-I*R,kNs for an ISStter is calculated as
penditures. to the Mate of the largest the projected deficit plus 10"/() of tike
I
Generally speaking. a local (,o\- cumulatiV e deficit. The deficit must previous year's ,general fund working
ernment can issue an amount equal to occur vyithin six months of the date the capital expenditures (See Fig are B).
its projected ,general fund maximum TRANS are issued. Generally.the work-
cumulative cash flow deficit plus a ing capital reserve can equal ftp to IM/0 j
working capital reserve. The borrow-- of the previous fiscal year general fund
ing relates to the public agency's fiscal expenditures. after deducting capital
year and usuallc occurs at the hegin- expenditures and transfers out.
ning of a new fiscal year.
The maximum cunurlatiye cash E
flow deficit is determined by consider- i
i
in,g he-inning .tyailabie cash on tike
I I
I
Tax and Revenue Anticipation Notes I
Sample Sizing 1
(1000)
Beginning Ending
Month Balance Revenues Disbursements Balance
1 luly 2.500 3500 3.000 1.000
i
august 1.000 3.500 3.000 0001 j
3 September (300) 3.300 3.000 (2.000)
4 October (2.000) 3.500 5.000 (3.500)
3 November (3,300) 3500 3,000 (3.000)
6 December (3.000) 13.500 3.000 3,500
I i
- '.000 j
Jamar-v! 3500 3500 3.000
.
8 Fehnrar� 2000 3500 3.000 300 1
�I I i
9 March 300 3.300 3.000 (1,000) i
10 Aprii (1.000) 11.300 3.000 5,500
11 blah 3,300 3,300 3.000 4.000
i
1' lu11e4.000 x.000 2,500
Total j
1 111 61 111
Workint_* Capital Reserve 6.000
Maximum C;wnrlatiye (:ash 1=1r,�y Deficit �.+101) i
\(axinwn TRAN amount 11,000
i
i
i
0000,�;>
i
i
REQUnUMUMSj
OF NI• •
Flit following is a list of steps .r Legal Structure CSCDA Financing Team
local government needs to take in
order to participate in the CSCDA Each participant in the CSCDA Following a competitive bid pro-
Pooled TRANS Pro-rain. TRANS Pro-rain will _issue an indi- cess, CSCDA assembled a financing
vidual note obligation. The note obli- team to he managed by Sutro & Co.
• Complete Application by March gation is authorized by resolu[ion of Incorporated, acting as the managing
31. 1993 (last page of this bro- the governing board as directed by underwriter of the program. Sutro has
chore) Article 7.6. Chapter 4, Part 1, Division considerable experience working with '
• Provide three vears of AUdiied 2. Title 3 under Section 53380 of the issuers of tax and revenue anticipation
iFinancial Information and Cur- California Government Code. Each notes and piogeered pooled TRANS
rent Budget by March 31, 1993 participant in the program is respon- programs in Califot�iia. j
i
• Complete Credit Questionnaire Bible for the repayment of its note j
by April 23, 1993 (to he provided obligation and has no responsibility for Orrick Herrington &Z Sutcliffe will I
1 upon receipt of application). the repavtnent of notes issued by other act as bond counsel for the program.
• Provide 1992-93 Actual/Estimated- participants in the program. Orrick is a nationally rea>tynized law
Monthly Cash Flows by April 23, firm which specializes in tax exempt
1993 CSCDA will issue Revenue Bonds municipal Finance, is the largest such
• Provide 1993-94 Projected v-�•hich will be special obligations pay- law firm in California and has consid-
Nionthly Cash Flows by April 23, able troln the underlving note ohli�ga- erahle experience in the area of pooled !,
;993 tions of die participants in the ProTRANS programs.
• Governing Body adopts an All- Tram. Additional security will he pro-
thorizing ResOhltion vicied on the Revenue Bonds throu(Ili HB Capital will serve as Financial
• Sign Documentation a Reserve Bond issue to be issued 1)V Advisor for [he CSCDA program and
CSCDA in Mav 1993. will coordinate the efforts of the fi-
nancing [earn, the League and CSAC.
Questions
1993 Timetable
Questions regarding CSCDA's
February - Mardl Presentations regarding the prograin will he held � pooled TRANS Program can he dl'-
throughout the State of California in 24 locations reeted to the League?CSAC• Catherine i
j ! Bando of Su[ro Co.at(800)252-9031
I -March 31, 1993 Application deadline
PP or Gerald Burke, financial advisor- for
the Program, at (800) 633-3993. I
April '3, 1993 Participants complete Credit Questionnaire and
prepare cash flows
� I
� I
Art-it - Ntav Governing Body Approvals
)royals �
ti
i
1 ' Mav 31. 1993 Participants complete Closing Questionnaire
i
(one Estahlish Interest Rate. prepare and sign closing
dolllillCri[atlon
i
[Lik 1. II193 Closing 'Incl delivery of funds to Particip;tnts
i
0,
I
j
I
I
j
1TAx AND REvENuE ANTicimnoN •
i
Financial Statements are Required
Please submit answers to the Following questions, and mail application to the address provided below with three yews of
audited financial statements and current budget. if possible, please provide three copies of financial statements.
IINFoRmAnoN ABouT • h i
I
City;County,District �
Contact Person E
Title
.-address
Telephone _ ---
i
Fax NUrnber
i
I
Estimated TRANs Amount
I
Please list 'he officials that will be authorized to sign docxnnentation in connection wide the -rRA\s issue.
Name of Official Title
i
Ptease provide a listing of your Board/Council Meeting Schedule for the months of April and 1lay.
Meeting Date Agenda Deadline
i
i
i
i
Please I provide information relating to the City/County/Disu-ict general counsel who will be reviewing-
ciorunhentation on your behalf.
i
ConlaCt Person
Affiliation
Adclress —
Telephone — --
I
F;u \unhher
i lui!!bra ii/yVicatiolr rt,itb tbrCc i'ecus oC curditcd/inu�rc ict(.�tcttc me�tts cntcl ctu r c nt hud���t. hl,_tlarcb,;I. 1W)' o:
�,;rrbCri�tC 11 . Bando. 0trector • lutro c-Co. btcoi/ionated 555)'. rlowerStreet. Jttite_-;-00 • Lni_- WICIC . (..1 900-1
i
800) 2j 2-9051 - (21 i 1 i6?--4 1 i • (_'1 i) o2-4--526 P'IX
COST OF ISSUANCE*
Pool $300 $200 $100
Size Million Million Million
Number of 90 60 30
Issuers
Issue Size
$20.OMM $161)658 $171225 $18,925
$15.OMM $161375 $16,880 $181075
$10.0MM $16,092 $16,375 $175225
$ 7.5MM $141950 $151913 $165800
$ 5 .OMM $131808 $141450 $15,375
$ 4.OMM $13,352 $13,865 $1405
$ 3 .OMM $121895 $13,280 $13,835
$ 2.OMM $111438 $111695 $121062
$ 1 .0MM $ 6,982 $ 7, 110 $ 71295
$ 0.5MM $ 3,753 $ 3,818 $ 3,910
Plus underwriting fee of between .065% and .085%.
XIV
WHA' ISSUE
IN A POOL?
L--
Sin
Issue TRANs
�
• Timing Flexibility
• Market Identity for Large or Frequent Issuers
i
CSCDA Pooled Program
• Cost Savings
• Greater Access to Capital Markets
• Streamlined Process
• Government Approvals May Be Smoother
i
V
- o000 ;fit
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL Meeting Date: 03/23/93
CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item: B-7
Through: Andy Takata, Assistant City Manager
From: Lee Raboin, City Clerk
SUBJECT:
Supporting the League of California Cities Channel Counties Division's
Legislative Action Program for 1993.
RECOMMENDATION: - g
Adopt Resolution No. . 15-93 formally supporting the !Channel Counties
Division's Legislative Action Program for 1993.
BACKGROUND:
On March 9, 1993, the City Council reviewed a request by Penny Rappa,
President of the Channel Counties Division, to support by formal resolution the
Division's Legislative Action Program. Council concurred and directed staff to
prepare the document. Resolution No. 15-93 is identical to those already adopted by
the Channel Counties Division and the City of San Luis Obispo.
Attachments: Proposed Resolution No. 15-93
Penny Rappa's letter dated 2/25/93
RESOLUTION NO. 15-93
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING THE LEAGUE
OF CALIFORNIA CITIES CHANNEL COUNTIES DIVISION'S
LEGISLATIVE ACTION PROGRAM FOR 1993
WHEREAS, the State of California is anticipating a revenue
shortfall , estimated at $10 billion, and;
WHEREAS, the Channel Counties Division of the League of
California Cities wishes to mitigate attempts by the State to
secure needed revenues from cities, and;
WHEREAS, the Atascadero City Council promotes the Division' s
wishes to take an active role in influencing the decisions of our
State legislators;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the
City of Atascadero does hereby adopt the Channel Counties
Division' s Legislative Action Program to reduce the impact of the
State revenue shortfall on cities ,
"Cementing a Relationship with Our Legislators"
♦ Identify and document the impacts we are experiencing with the
assistance of the City Managers Group.
♦ List all possible revenue "taking" options and anticipated
impacts and distribute to each city, based upon past
proposals .
♦ Share information with our respective legislative
representatives on a regular basis in their field offices and
let them know we are on the front lines making difficult ant
"politically unpopular" decisions on a daily basis .
♦ Request meetings between February and June, to establish the
cumulative impacts of budget "takings" on our division.
♦ Utilize Division Quarterly Meetings to share our experiences
and strategies .
♦ Inform the State League Directors of our plan and coordinate
with other ongoing activities .
♦ Identify opportunities for additional revenues and offer
solutions .
Resolution No. 15-93
•
Page Two
On motion by Councilperson and seconded by
Councilperson , the foregoing Resolution is hereby
adopted in its entirety on the following roll call; vote :
AYES :
NOES :
ABSENT:
ADOPTED:
ATTEST: CITY OF ATASCADERO
i
By:
LEE RABOIN, City Clerk ROBERT P. NIMMO, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ARTHER R. MONTANDON, City Attorney
3/9/93.. � �,w.2...,
city of Sin luis oBispo
•
990 Palm Street/Post Office Box 8100 • San Luis Obispo, CA 93403-8100
February 25, 1993
Mr. Ray Windsor, City Manager
City of Atascadero
6500 Palma Ave. ` r
Atascadero, CA 9422
Dear Ray:
At the Channel Counties Division meeting in February, all cities were asked to adopt a
resolution supporting the Division's Legislative Action Program. I have enclosed U copy of
the resolution adopted by San Luis Obispo for your reference. Could you for-waif a copy
of your resolution to my office? If your city has not yet adopted a resolution supporting
this program, hopefully your City Council will be considering it in the near future.
There was also great interest in our one page analysis of what the State budget grabs have
meant to San Luis Obispo. If your Finance Director can generate a similar analysis and
forward it to my office, I would appreciate it. This data will be forwarded to the League
in Sacramento as well as to our State legislators. The more information we have to take
to our legislators, the greater the impact we will have on their decision-making.
Please send copies of your resolution and fiscal impacts to the attention of Diane Gladwell
at the above address. If you have any questions, call me at (805) 781-7103. 1 look forward
to seeing you at our April 16 quarterly meeting in Camarillo.
;PennaDDa
�'
1 1
President
CHANNEL COUNTIES DIVISION
LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES
PR:klc
00()0r`3
RESOLUTION NO. 8120 (1993 SERIES)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO SUPPORTING THE LEAGUE
OF CALIFORNIA CITIES CHANNEL COUNTIES DIVISION'S
LEGISLATIVE ACTION PROGRAM FOR 1993
WHEREAS, the State of California is anticipating a revenue shortfall, estimated at
$10 billion, and;
WHEREAS, the Channel Counties Division of the League of California Cities wishes
to mitigate attempts by the State to secure needed revenues from cities, and;
WHEREAS, the San Luis Obispo City Council promotes the Division's wishes to take
an active role in influencing the decisions of our State legislators;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the San Luis Obispo City Council
does hereby adopt this resolution in support of the Channel CountiesDivision's Legislative
Action Program to reduce the impact of the State revenue shortfall on cities.
"Cementing a Relationship with Our Legislators"
. Identify and document the impacts we are experiencing with the assistance of the
City Managers Group.
List all possible revenue "taking' options and anticipated impacts and distribute to
each city, based upon past proposals.
• Share information with our respective legislative representatives on a regular basis
in their field offices and let them know we are on the front lines making difficult and
"politically unpopular" decisions on a daily basis.
Request meetings between February and June, to establish the cumulative impacts
of budget "takings" on our division.
Utilize Division Quarterly Meetings to share our experiences and strategies.
• Inform the State League Directors of our plan and coordinate with other ongoing
activities.
-8120
Resolution No. 8120 (L 'j Series)
Page 2
Identify opportunities for additional revenues and offer solutions.
On motion of Council Member Settle , seconded by Council Member Romero
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Council Members Settle, Romero, Roalman, and Mayor Pinard
NOES: None
ABSENT: Council Member Rappa
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted on this 16th day of February, 1993.
May Pinard
ATTEST:
Dia�fe R. ladwell, City Clerk
By: Kim Condon, Assistant City Clerk
APPROVED:
R
City Ad -nistrative Officer
ttoey/
s
00001")
Summary of State Budget Grabs
What was proposed for 1992-93 (Cities in San Luis Obispo County) . . . . .
Vehicle Property
License Fees Taxes TOTAL
Arroyo Grande $504,200 $121,900 $626,100
Atascadero 810,800 810,800
Grover City 412,300 67,300 479,600
Morro Bay 337,000 183,900 520,900
Paso Robles 698,200 1949300 892,500
Pismo Beach 266,800 64,400 331,200
San Luis Obispo 1,472,600 417,400 1,890,000
TOTAL $4,501,900 $1,Q49,200.--.--- ,. $5,551,100
* Based on initial propomis, the City ofAtascatiero was to
be unaffected by the proposed change in Rropgrty tax
allocations as it incorpora ted after the passage ofBA8,
however,it was affected by the final State cuts in the
amount of$200,000 annually.
What happened?
Cities lost $205 million in General Fund property taxes and another $205 million in
redevelopment agency revenues. On the General Fund side, final revenue cuts were very
close to the initial property tax proposals, leaving VLF as a large remaining target.
What has the last two years meant to the City of San Luis Obispo?
1991-92
Property tax administration fees 125,000
Booking fees 130,000
Cigarette tax in lieu 60,000
Fines & forfeitures 125,000
Sexual assault response team SART exams 40,000
1992-93
Property tax allocation transfer 436,000
j Cigarette tax in lieu 60,000
TOTAL $976,000
This means we have lost almost $1 million dollars, the equivalent of 20 Police Officers.
What can the State do?
no- Limit the deductibility of mortgage interest
*- Retain current sales tax rate
Increase gas tax rate
Improve efficiency in State operations
m*- Implement the long—term structural changes necessary to really balance the State budget
000{ 1-;t"
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item: B-8
From: Andrew J. Takata, Assistant City Manager Meeting Date: 3/23/93
SUBJECT: Request to support the position of the S.L.O. Coalition fof C6operative
Government regarding the State fiscal crisis
RECOMMENDATION:
By motion, support the position of the SLO Coalition for Cooperative Government.
DISCUSSION:
Please reference the attached letter from Chairman Harry Ovitt and Paso Robles
Schools Superintendent Julian Crocker on behalf of the San Luis Obispo Coalition for
Cooperative Government.
AT:cw
Attachments
00 001-11-7 I
.? zs456-
County
isso Collip of San Luis Obispo
COUNTY G01"ERNME\T CENTER,R.M.370■ SAA'Luis OBISPO,CALIFORNIA 93408•(805) 781-5011
March 4, 1993 OFFICE OF THE
COUNTY ADMI\ISTRATOR
John Dunn, City Administrator -
City of San Luis Obispo
P.O. Box 8100
San Luis Obispo, CA 93403-8100
Dear Mr. Dunn:
The Governor is proposing that the state help balance its budget by severely impacting local
government. More specifically, the Governor in his proposed budget for fiscal year 1993-94
has recommended that the state take an additional $2.6 billion from the local property tax
revenues of cities, counties and specials districts. While this would partially relieve the state
of its responsibility to fund the schools, in actuality it provides no additional financial
support. We believe we must as a county "say no," but in a way which offers viable
alternatives for the state to pursue.
In this vein, the Coalition for Cooperative Government,which is made up of representatives
of the county, cities, schools, and special districts has reconvened to put together a list of
constructive ideas which can be offered to the state as alternatives to the further taking of
local property tax revenue. This group, which was initially formed two years ago to
cooperatively address the issue of SB 2557,met on February 19th and produced the attached
letter. We propose to send this letter to the Governor, our legislators, and our various
statewide organizations.
We believe a coalition of local agencies will have a collective "power" which none of us
acting separately could achieve. We also believe that the concepts expressed in the attached
letter will have considerably more impact if it has the endorsement of every local
governmental unit in San Luis Obispo County. As such, the Coalition is asking that this
letter be presented to your governing body with a recommendation for Its endorsement. In
this respect, if your governing body feels it appropriate to suggest modifications in the
language of the letter, please insert the modifications and then adopt it.
In order to give the parties in Sacramento sufficient time to work with our suggestions, we
would like to send them up as soon as possible. Hence, it would be greatly appreciated if
you could inform us of your governing body's action on this letter by March 26, 1993.
To the best of our knowledge this kind of united approach is not being taken in other
counties throughout the state. With quick action, we believe we have the opportunity to be
in the forefront of developing solutions to this situation. Your help, and the help of your
agency, in presenting this united front will be greatly appreciated.
HARRY . VITT, Chairman LIAN D. CROCKER, Superintendent
San Luis Obispo County so Robles Public Schools
Board of Supervisors
attachment
adm\coopgvt
0000"')
•
February 26, 1993
DRAFT (BY ED DENTON, LEE
WILLIAMS, JULIAN CROCKER AND
JOHN DUNN, AND AS AMENDED BY
OTHERS)
POSITION OF THE COALITION FOR COOPERATIVE GOVERNMENT OF SAN LUIS
OBISPO COUNTY (SCHOOL DISTRICTS, SPECIAL DISTRICTS, CITIES AND COUNTY)
IN RESPONSE TO THE GOVERNOR'S BUDGET PROPOSAL
The Governor's budget proposes to shift to school districts and community colleges $2.6
billion of local property tax that currently is received by cities, counties and special
districts. This would relieve the State of$2.6 billion of its funding obligations to education.
In essence, the State is paying its obligation with local property taxes taken from one
entity and given to another.
The Governor's budget proposal, on the surface, takes property tax from local
governments and gives it to the schools. In reality it reduces the State's constitutional
obligation to fund education, thereby increasing the State's income at the expense of
cities and counties. It is a blatant property tax grab from local government in California,
and a reduction of State funding to education. .
Historically, in California, State government has been supported by personal and
corporate income tax, and local government has been financed by property taxes. The
Governor's budget proposal amounts to a historic and fundamental tax shift of property
taxes away from local government, and using that money to address the budget deficit
of the State of California.
\/%.'hile the Governor's budget emphasis is on job creation, the State's reduction in
property tax support for local government will cost local government many jobs, jobs
v,,hich provide critical services to California citizens.
Our collective position is that California local government should not be weakened by the
State's taking of critically-needed property tax revenue, nor should California education
be weakened by a reduction of State support for it.
We urge the Governor and the State Legislature to recognize the following principles:
1. The State must continue, and increase, its historic support of education, for it is
only through the education of our future citizens that the State can remain strong
and competitive in a world economy.
2. The State must preserve or create a protected, predictable source of financing for
the local agencies of California. In the past there has been a strong local home
rule tradition, and this must be preserved in order to give local agencies a sense
of protection, independence and stability and reduce the volatility and
unpredictability of local government finance which leads to the perpetration of a
continual crisis situation.
3. The State must encourage and support local agency's efforts to maintain a viable
local economy and to create and maintain jobs for its citizens.
4. Local government must recognize the need to look for opportur tie4 for cost
savings by identifying commonly-provided services, exploring P possible
consolidation and/or contracting .arrangements to cut overhead and to save
money. This can best be accomplished by all units of local government working
together in a cooperative fashion, with State assistance in the form of incentives
to encourage such cooperation.
Therefore, in recognition of our goals and the reality of the State's financial position, we
believe it is our collective obligation to come up with constructive alternatives for
consideration by the Governor and State Legislators.
We believe; for the short term:
1. The State should continue the present 1/2 cent sales tax until the State's fiscal
emergency eases through economic recovery.
2. All local agencies, including school districts, should be given greater authority and
flexibility for independent revenue raising and service delivery.
3. The State should consider removing the restrictions on use of certain State tax
revenues, with gas tax being one example.
4. The State should share a portion of the current fiscal burden by incorporating the
Governor's earlier mandated departmental budget reductions,to further reduce the
cost of State government.
5. The State should consider raising additional revenue by closing tax loopholes.
ll0l�`.3F,..�
f �
6. The State should totally re-evaluate the purpose, function, productivity and benefit
of all State Commissions and Boards, and delete those not meeting bonafide and
explicit State objectives.
7. All local government and local school districts should identify onerous State
mandates, and the State should relieve local governments from those mandates
providing marginal benefit to State objectives.
We believe, for the longer term:
8. The Governor and the Legislature should sanction majority voter approval for
general obligation bonds for capital facilities, and special taxes for operating
purposes.
9. The State should study and implement the difficult structural reforms necessary to
ensure the long-term fiscal health and viability of the State. There needs to be a
long-term plan developed for meeting people's needs and for financipg 1he State
programs necessary to do this.
10. The State should establish incentives to encourage intergovernmental collaboration
among cities, counties and school districts.
To do our part, members of the Coalition for Cooperative Government will look at
opportunities for cost savings by listing commonly-provided services, and exploring
possible consolidation and/or contracting arrangements to cut overhead and to save
money.
In conclusion, we realize that the State of California is in an extremely difficult financial
situation. Because of this we realize that local government agencies will have to be part
of a "shared pain" process. However, we genuinely believe that the Governor's budget
proposal, in its initial form, represents an unwarranted and unwise assault on our
established and historical system of local government financing in California. We realize
our obligation to prepare constructive alternatives to the proposal and, in the text above,
we have done that.
Counties and cities and special districts are an integral part of the system of government
in California. We, in combination with local school systems, are those levels of
government closest to the people I we serve. Our services to our citizens and our integrity
p
must be respected by the State legislature as they go through the difficult process of
dealing with the fiscal crisis and, at the same time, preserving what should be preserved
for the well-being, health and welfare of our common citizens.
JD:mc
h:proposal
•
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item: B- 9
From: Ray Windsor, City Manager- Meeting Date: 3/23/93
SUBJECT: Application by North County Women's Shelter for FESG gjA
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt Resolution No. 18-93.
DISCUSSION:
We have been requested by the North County Women's Shelter to adopt a resolution,
similar to that passed by Council last year, which would authorize the Mayor or Mayor
Pro Tem to execute a certification of local approval for funding related to the Shelter's
overhead and staffing costs.
Based upon last year's authorization, staff is placing this under the consent portion
of the agenda. The amount of the grant is unknown at this time but is expected to
be between $20,000-$30,000.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No fiscal impact. Approving the grant application does not financially obligate the City
in any way.
RW:cw
Attachments
i
RESOLUTION NO. 18-93
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA
AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A CERTIFICATE OF LOCAL
APPROVAL FOR THE NORTH COUNTY WOMEN'S SHELTER
The City Council of the City of Atascadero, California, hereby resolves as
follows:
The Mayor Pro Tem is hereby authorized to execute a Certification of
Local Approval to be submitted as part of an application for the-
Federal Emergency Grant Program 1993 to the State of California,
Department of Housing & Community Development for the North
County Women's Shelter.
On motion by Councilperson , seconded by Councilperson ,
the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety by the following roll-call
vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ADOPTED:
ATTEST: CITY OF ATASCADERO
By:
LEE RABOIN, City Clerk MARTY KUDLAC, Mayor Pro Tem
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ARTHER R. MONTANDON, City Attorney
000-M�<
• RESOLUTION NO. 32-92
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA
AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A CERTIFICATE OF LOCAL APPROVAL
FOR THE NORTH COUNTY WOMENS' SHELTER
The City Council of the City of Atascadero, California, hereby
resolves as follows:
The Mayor ProTem is hereby authorized to execute a Certi-
fication of Local Approval to be submitted as part of an
application for the Federal Emergency Grant Program k992 to
the State of California Department of Housing & -CoWmunity
Development for the North County Womens ' Shelter. F
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of
the City of Atascadero held on the 24th of March, 1992.
CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA
By:
ROBERT P. NIMMO
Mayor ProTem
ATTEST:
L`�E RABOIN
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
AAR HER R. MO TANDON
City Attorney
ATTACHMENT E
CERTIFICATION OF LOCAL APPROVAL
I, ROBERT P. NIMMO, MAYOR PROTEM (Name and Title) duly authorized to act
on behalf of THE CITY OF ATASCADERO (Name of Jurisdiction),hereby approve
the following project(s) proposed by THE NORTH COUNTY WOMENS' RESOURCE CENTER (Name of
Nonprofit Organization or Local Government) which is/are to be located in
CITY OF ATASCADERO (Name of Jurisdiction):
THE NORTH COUNTY WOMENS' SHELTER, A 24-HOUR A DAY SAFE HOUSE
FOR VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND OTHER CRIMES.
a
CERTIFICATION:
(Signature)
ROBERT P. NIMMO, MAYOR PROTEM
(Name and Title)
MARCH 24, 1992
(Date)
1
Minutes Excerpt
City Council, 3/24/92
COMMUNITY FORUM:
Barbara MacGregor, Executive Director of the North County' s Womens '
Shelter, requested Council approval of a grant application, under
the 1992 Federal Emergency Shelter Grant Program, for the North
County Womens ' Shelter. She indicated that application criteria
called for formal approval by the local jurisdiction and reported
that the application needed to be submitted right away.
City Attorney, Art Montandon, advised the Council that ;if they
believed the need for action had armee within the last seventy-two
hours , it could place the :natter on the agenda with a unanimous
CC03/24/92
Page 1
vote.
MOTION: By Councilman Dexter, seconded: by Councilman Lilley to
I place the matter on the agenda as an urgency item;
motion carried 4:0. Mayor ProTem Nimmo stated that the
matter would be the first under Regular Business.
D. REGULAR BUSINESS:
SPECIAL ADDED ITEM - NORTH COUNTY TWOMENS I SHELTER GRANT- APPLICATION
Barbara MacGregor submitted a breakdown of how grant funds would be
used, if approved (See Exhibit A) Mayor ProTem Nimmo asked her if --=�
the City would be obligated financially in any way by giving
approval for the grant application. Ms. MacGregor- indicated that-
.
t would not.
MOTION: By Councilman Lilley, seconded by Councilman Dexter to
approve Resolution No. 32-92; motion carried 4:0 by roll
call vote.
CC03/24/92
Page 4
0000V7
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL Meeting Date: 3-23-93
• CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item: C_1
Through: Ray Windsor, City Manager
Via: Henry Engen, Director of Community Development
From: Valerie Humphrey, Department of Public'. Works
SUBJECT:
Public Hearing regarding mandatory connection to the public
sewer system. Cease and Desist areas C & E (Seperado Cayucos) and
I (San Gabriel) .
BACKGROUND:
The City is operating under a Cease and Desist Order issued by
the Regional Water Quality Control Board which requires that we
provide sanitary sewer service to specific areas of the city. Upon
completion of the construction of the system connection is
mandatory.
. In the case of areas C & E (Seperado-Cayucos) ' sewer has been
available since 1987. The vast majority of the approximately 350
parcels have connected as required; however, there are currently 25
properties using septic systems.
In area I (San Gabriel Road) the sewer line was constructed
in 1987 in conjunction with the construction of the new elementary
school. Although the line was available, connection could not be
allowed until a General Plan amendment was passed which provided
for sewering Cease and Desist areas outside the Urban Services
Line. Such an amendment has been adopted and connection is now
mandatory.
In June of 1992 Council adopted Resolution No. 57-92 which
allows the City to use enforcement powers afforded by the State of
California's Health and Safety Code to ensure the connection of all
buildings in Cease and Desist areas.
In January of 1993 Council adopted Ordinance No. 246 amending
the previous Wastewater Ordinance by allowing the forced connection
of properties which are in violation.
On March 1st letters were sent to all effected property owners
via certified mail advising them of this hearing and explaining the
procedures to be followed by the City.
0(,1 t--�.i
DISCUSSION•
In conformance with Ordinance No. 246, all properties
remaining unconnected by the deadline will be connected by the
City. Bids will be solicited on an hourly basis for the
construction necessary for the abandonment of the on-site septic
system and the connection to the public sewer. The bid process
will be similar to the procedure used for weed abatement.
The contractor will be paid from Wastewater funds and
reimbursement will be accomplished through a lein against the
property collected on the taxes -over 15 years at 10% interest.
Any Connection and Annexation Fees will be collected in the
same manner as the construction costs. One exception to this is
the reimbursement due the School District from the 6 lots on San
Gabriel. Our agreement with the District states that reimb4rsement
will be collected from the property owners and paid tol tliem upon
connection to the line. In this situation, the Wastewater Fund
will reimburse the District and the reimbursement amount will be
added to the taxes for repayment to the City.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The financial impact on the Wastewater Fund will be determined
by the number of properties that are not connected by the deadline
of September 23 , 1993 .
There are currently 31 properties affected by this deadline.
The worst case scenario would be total noncompliance which would
force the City to finance connection to all properties. It is
estimated that the average cost for the abandonment and connection
would be approximately $2 , 000 per parcel for a total of $62, 000.
In addition, the City would be required to reimburse the School
District for the 6 lots on San Gabriel in the amount of $29, 670. In
this case the total cash outlay by the City could approach
$100, 000.
If the City fails to comply with the provisions of the Cease
and Desist order the Regional Board can take enforcement action
against the City, including injunctions and civil remedies, or
refer the City back to the Board for further enforcement action.
Attchments:
Copy of Notice sent to all affected properties
March 1, 1993 letter sent to San Gabriel properties
March 1, 1993 letter sent to Seperado/Cayucos properties
WOW'sa
NOTICE TO CONNECT TO THE PUBLIC SEWER SYSTEM
Notice is hereby given that on the 26th day of January, 1993
the City council passed a resolution declaring that this "building"
shall connect to the public sewer system and properly abandon any
on-site sewage treatment/disposal system. Otherwise the City will
connect said residence and have property abandoned any on-site
sewage treatment/disposal system and all% costs of connection and
abandonment plus 25% for overhead and all applicable fees kssessed
upon the property upon which the work was performe4, will
constitute a lien upon such property until paid. Reference is
hereby made to the resolution for further particulars. A copy of
said resolution is on file in the office of the Department of
Public Works.
All property owners having any objections to the proposed
mandatory connection are hereby notified to attend a meeting of the
City Council of the City of Atascadero to be held March 23rd, 1993 ,
when their objections will be heard and given due consideration.
Dated this 1st day of March, 1993 .
2En�
Henry Engen
Director of Community evelopment
Citv of Atascadero
00001,111)
SEPERADO/CAYUCOS
CEASE AND DESIST AREA
i
197 9 y CITY OF ATASCADERO
March 1, 1993
SUBJECT: Mandatory Connection to Sewer System
Dear Property Owner:
The State of California, through the Regional Water NQuality
Control Board, has issued a Cease and Desist Order whichlprohibits
the use of on-site sewage disposal systems (septic tanks) when -
public sewer is available. With the completion of Assessment
District No. 4 in 1987 sewer service has been available to your
property and connection is now mandatory.
The fees associated with this connection are as follows:
Abandonment Permit Fee $40. 00
Connection Permit Fee 5. 00
The cost of physically abandoning the septic system and
connecting to the sewer line is not included in this price. You
may hire a contractor or choose to do part of the work yourself.
Please be aware that any work done in the city right of way must be
accomplished by a licensed contractor.
You are hereby notified that this connection must be completed
by September 23 , 1993 . If you cannot arrange connection by that
deadline then the city will authorize a contractor to connect the
property to the sewer system. In this event, the entire cost of
fees and construction will become a lein on the property which
shall be repaid to the City through a municipal tax assessed over
a 15 year period at 10 percent interest. Any portion of the amount
assessed not repaid shall be required to be paid off upon transfer
of the property.
I am enclosing a copy of Ordinance No. 246 which details the
procedures to be followed by the City. If you have any questions,
please contact me at 461-5020.
SiL9cerely,
VALERIE HUMPHREY
Department of Public W rks
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS • 6500 PALMA AVENUE • ATASCADERO, CA 93422
A,iministratiiw/Er�iueerin�: 8051461-5020 Wastewater Treatment: 461-5077 • City FAX: 461-0606 0000 1.
SAN GABRIEL ROAD
CEASE AND DESIST AREA
r 0IIr Fr'Ir'-
\1918 1 m r~'"2 � • 19�ar , CITY OF ATASCADERO
March 1, 1993
SUBJECT: Mandatory Connection to Sewer System
APN 54-151-039 - San Gabriel Road
Dear Sir/Ms:
The State of California, through the Regional Water Quality
Control Board, has issued Cease and Desist Order No. 92-68 which
prohibits the use of on-site sewage disposal systems (septic tanks)
when public sewer is available. Since completion of the San Gabriel
Road School, sewer service has been available to your property and
connection is now mandatory.
You are therefore required to abandon your on-site sewage
disposal system and connect to the sewer which runs along the
frontage of your property.
The fees associated with this connection are as follows:
Reimbursement to School District $ 4945. 00
Annexation Fee 850. 00
Connection Fee 5. 00
Encroachment Permit Fee 30. 00
Abandonment Permit Fee 40. 00
TOTAL $ 5870. 00
The cost of physically abandoning the septic system and
connecting to the sewer line is not included in this price. You
may hire a contractor or choose to do part of the work yourself.
Please be aware that any work done in the city right of way must be
accomplished by a licensed contractor.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 6500 PALMA AVENUE • ATASCADERO, CA 93422
11mi�tisfratin F,i�iru°cri�i�: 805-1461-5020 Wash,watttr Treatment: 461-5077 • Ohl FAX: 461-0606 00011)1_11-)
City ordinance requires that this connection be completed
within 6 months of the date of the hearing noticed herewith, or
September 23 , 1993 . If you cannot arrange connection by that
deadline then the city will authorize a contractor to connect the
property to the sewer system. In this event, the entire cost of
fees and construction will become a lein on the property which
shall be repaid to the City through a municipal tax assessed over
a 15 year period at 10 percent interest. Any portion of the amount
assessed not repaid upon transfer of the property shall be required
to be paid off in escrow.
I am enclosing a copy of Ordinance No. 246 which details the
procedures to be followed by the City. If you have any questions,
please contact me at 461-5020.
Sincerely,
VALERIE HUMPHREY
Department of Public Works
attn: Notice to Connect to Public Sewer System
Ordinance No. 246
• REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item: C-2
Through: Andrew Takata, Asst. City Manager Meeting,Date: 3 -23-93
From: Henry Engen, Community Development Director �s
SUBJECT: Request for Authorization to Submit an Application for a State Department of
Housing and Community Development Community Development Block
Grant (CDBG) Program to fund the site acquisition and rehabilitation for the
North County Women's Resource Center (NCWRC) domestic violence shelter.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Council adopt Resolution #J6-t3
authorizing the submittal of an application to the CDBG Program, and if'fundedl approve
execution of grant agreement. Furthermore, staff recommends that council approve a limited
contribution of fee waivers and in-kind audit expenses related to the grant.
DISCUSSION: The State of California Department of Housing and Community
Development administers the Small Cities Community Development Block Grant Program.
Each year, non-HUD entitlement jurisdictions may apply for up to $500,000 in CDBG funds.
Eligible uses for the funds include housing, public facilities, community facilities and
services, and economic development.
In 1992, the City was awarded a Planning and Technical Assistance CDBG (P/TA) Grant to
assist the North County Women's Resource Center identify a site and means for a permanent
facility for the Domestic Violence Emergency Shelter.
As required by CDBG regulations, a Public Meeting was held on March 12, 1993, to solicit
input regarding potential block grant eligible activities for which the City may apply in the
1993 funding cycle. The only respondents to our solicitation for input on possible grant
activities was the North County Women's Resource Center who submitted a thoroughly
researched proposal to fund a shelter site identified utilizing the P/TA grant. The NCWRC's
P/TA grant will also fund the writing of a General Allocation CDBG application. This
activity has been identified by State CDBG staff as highly competitive. City staff, therefore,
recommends that the NCWRC's proposed activity be chosen for the application.
The attached draft Citizen Participation Plan, application text and exhibitlist have been
written by Peoples' Self-Help Housing Corporation staff, and are accompanied by a
resolution which is a prerequisite to submitting the application.
DIMIc 1'SxxcATAscCTI SI'AFF.RPT
(Il)(I{ ''',i
CITY CONTRIBUTIONS: In order to present a competitive application to HCD, the City
will need to contribute to the activity. We recommend that the City waive up to $800 in •
building permit fees, and absorb audit expenses related to the grant, in the amount of $500.
The total of the City's participation will not exceed $1,300. This contribution is essential to
bring over $350,000 into our community. The City will be entitled to a percentage of the
total grant amount for the grant's general administrative activity, wick will more than offset
these City contributions.
i
D13M,C:\PSHHC\ATASC\CTYSTAFF.RPT
RESOLUTION NO. 16-93
A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN APPLICATION AND CONTRACT EXECUTION
FOR FUNDING FROM THE GENERAL ALLOCATION OF THE STATE CDBG
PROGRAM, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A GRANT AGREEMENT WITH
THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS GRANT, AND
APPROVING THE WAIVER OF PROGRAM RELATED PERMITS AND FEES AND
THE CONTRIBUTION OF PROGRAM RELATED AUDIT EXPENSES
WHEREAS, the City of Atascadero recognizes the need for the services of a domestic
violence shelter;
WHEREAS, the North County Women's Resource Center provides those needed
services, and desires to improve and augment those services;
i
WHEREAS, community input has identified this needed shelter as a potential
Community Development Block Grant activity;
WHEREAS, the City has utilized the assistance of a non-profit housing organization
in the preparation and design of the City's CDBG application;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of
Atascadero as follows:
1. The City Council has reviewed and hereby approves an application for
$327,500 for the acquisition and rehabilitation of the North County Women's Resource
Center Domestic Violence Shelter site in Atascadero, and for $26,500 for the grant's general
administrative activity;
2. The City Council has reviewed the Citizen Participation Plan for compliance
with federal statute and has determined that this plan was followed for the development of
this application;
3. The City does hereby approve an in-kind donation of $500 for audit expenses
and $800 for payment of waived building permit fees to be used as the City's Cash Match
for this project;
4. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to act on the City's behalf
in all matters pertaining to this application; and,
Resolution No. 16-93
Page 2
5. If the application is approved, the City Manager is authorized to enter into and
sign the grant agreement and any subsequent amendments with the State of California for
purposes of this grant.
f seconded b
Upon motion o y the
forgoing Resolution if hereby passed and adopted in its entirety at this regular meeting of the
City Council of the City of Atascadero held on 3-23-92 by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ADOPTED: BY:
Robert P. Nimmo
Mayor of the City of Atascadero
ATTEST:
Lee Raboin, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Art Montandon, City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
Henry Engen, Community Development Director
CITY OF ATASCADERO
CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN
The purpose of the City of Atascadero Citizen Participation Plan is to ensure that the views
of the principal beneficiaries of the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program,
Target Income Group persons, and other affected persons are fully considered when a CDBG
program is developed and in any subsequent program or activity amendments.
In an effort to maintain maximum Citizen Participation, the City shall:
1. Provide and encourage citizen participation, with particular emphasis on participation
by Targeted Income Group persons who are residents of slum and blight areas and of
areas in which CDBG funds are proposed to be used;
2. Provide residents with reasonable and timely access to local meetings, information,
and the records relating to Atascadero's proposed use of CDBG funds, r uired by
CDBG regulations and relating to the actual use of funds under the Act, by locating
and timing the meetings convenient to potential or actual beneficiaries and with
accommodation for the handicapped, by giving adequate notice of public meetings,
and by maintaining a Public Information File of all CDBG program materials in the
City's Planning Division;
• 3. Provide technical assistance to groups representative of Target Income Group persons
that request such assistance in developing proposals by providinginformational
memorandums and proposed activity questionnaires during the application activity
selection process;
4. Provide public hearings with adequate notice to obtain citizen views and to respond to
proposals and questions at the development of needs/review of proposed activities
stage and the program performance review stage;
5. Define adequate notice of public meetings or hearings as providing an announcement
of the time, date and location in the Atascadero News (and other',media, if deemed
appropriate) a minimum of 10 days prior to the event. That announcement shall also
include the topic of the meeting and whether the meeting place accommodates the
handicapped;
6. Provide a timely written answer to written inquiries, complaints, and grievances
within 15 working days where practicable; and
7. Provide for language translation for non-English speaking residents during public
meetings and hearings where 25% or more of non-English speaking residents can be
reasonably expected to participate.
A: \CTZPRTPN.GEN
Needs Statement 1993 CDBG Application
City of Atascadero
NEEDS STATEMENT FORM
1. BRIEFLY DESCRIBE AND DOCUMENT THE SERIOUS AND BASIC HOUSING
NEEDS:
Introduction/Background
The North County Women's Resource Center (NCWRC) has been addressing one of North
San Luis Obispo County's most critical health and safety needs by providing an emergency
shelter for victims of domestic violence since 1985. The original mission of the cuter was
to serve as a clearinghouse of information of particular interest to women. The-1CVVRC was
formed in 1982 by the Atascadero branch of the American Association of University Women,
who had informally been acting in that capacity.
The NCWRC found itself increasingly treating and counseling victims of domestic violence.
NCWRC had been referring up to 15 to 20 women per month to the only domestic violence
in the area at that time, in San Luis Obispo. Then, in just four months, 120 incidents of
spousal abuse were reported in Atascadero. The Board and staff of the NCWRC recognized
the need for a domestic violence in the North County. Since the doors of the shelter were
opened on November 1, 1985, over 1200 women and children have been provided with
sanctuary.
Unfortunately, the former shelter site was not able to serve all those who need such services.
Many aspects of that site impeded better serving the needs of the victims: the rent was
expensive and all living spaces inadequate; there was no space available for group
counseling; there was no sheltered children's play area; there was no separate room for
private counseling or an on-site office; and there was no handicapped accessibility.
Furthermore, the facility was overcrowded, housing an average of seven women and children
per night in a three bedroom dwelling. In. 1991, approximately 20 women and children, and
in 1992, over 30 women and their children, had to be referred to shelters outside the area,
and in some cases, outside the County, due to the inadequate size of the dwelling. Ever
escalating rents at this site, as experienced elsewhere, began drawing away funding from the
essential services the NCWRC provides for domestic violence victims.
By purchasing a permanent shelter site, the NCWRC can free up funds for services more
productive than rent payments. By not having to expend precious staff time raising funds for
rent, the NCWRC will guarantee the delivery of service that is paramount to the long-term
success of the shelter program. The program that currently pays the rent -- the State
Emergency Shelter Program -- has been drastically cut back. Because the program was
WIM;C 1PSHHC\ATASCV93NI:I:DS.ATS 1
Needs Statement 1993 CDBG Application
City of Atascadero
based on State Initiative Bond Financing that has not been renewed, the future allocations
will eventually be eliminated.
Because of their concern about the suitability and stability of the shelter, the NCWRC's
Board of Directors realized their only alternative was to acquire a permanent shelter site.
Approached by the NCWRC in January of 1992, the City of Atascadero; recognizing the
need for a permanent domestic violence shelter site, applied for and was awarded a
Community Development Block Grant Program Planning and Technical Assistance Grant to
support the NCWRC in their search for a permanent shelter site.
Following the exacting analysis of shelter needs, identification of necessary shelter criteria
and a three month site search, the NCWRC has moved into its new location after a�lease
with an option to purchase had been negotiated and executed with the site owneih L93lease
refer to Exhibit 1.)
The NCWRC site is located, out of necessity, in the City of Atascadero because a majority
of its clients come from the City and all governmental agencies and support service providers
are located there. (Victims of domestic violence are, invariably, economically dependent
upon their batterer; therefore, financial and support services must be readily available once
the victim leaves the batterer.) The NCWRC entire scenario of excessive rents and
elimination of funding for rent can only be understood within the context of the City's most
serious and basic housing needs:
• According to 1990 Census data, 8 1.1% of the renter-households in Atascadero earn
less than 80% of the median income, yet pay more than 25% of that income for
housing. (Exhibit 14).
• There is a vacancy rate of 3.86% in Atascadero. There just are not that many options
available to choose from when looking for housing in Atascadero: Low and moderate
income families have been priced out of ownership housing and left to compete in the
rental market. This has caused family households of moderate income to continue to
rent, resulting in an increased demand for rental housing units. The moderate-income
household's ability to pay higher rents ultimately results in higher rents for all
households (Exhibit 14).
• The average Atascadero rent of $ is higher than the $ the State
Department of Housing and Community Development figures indicate a low-income
familiy has the ability to pay (Exhibit 11).
DIM 1C:\PSNHC\ATASC\93NEEDS.ATS 2
Needs Statement 1993 CDBG Application
City of Atascadero
Existing Service Levels
Unfortunately, the demand for domestic violence shelter services in the North County has
dramatically increased: in 1991, 20 households were turned away due to lack of space; in
1992, 35 households were uable to avail themselves of the shelter's services due to lack of
space. In 1992, 82 families, with a total of 187 persons stayed at the shelter.. The shortest
stay was for one day; the longest, 31 days. The maximum stay allowed is 60 days. The
average length of stay is nine days.
The youngest woman sheltered was 18 years old; the eldest, 57 years old. The youngest
child housed at the shelter was only one month old! The oldest child was 17 years.
Although children eighteen and over are not permitted to stay at the shelter, efforts-Fare made
to place them in a safe space. 77% of the victims were Caucasian, 12% Black,-*1nd 11%
Hispanic.
The Health and Safety Needs Addressed by a Domestic Violence Shelter
During the last few years, there has been an increasing public awareness of the problem of
spousal abuse. 31 states across the nation are either strengthening or proposing legislation to
strengthen criminal and civil statutes that penalize such behavior. (See CSM article in
Exhibit 15.) The increase in public awareness leads to more reported incidents, which in
turn lead to an increased demand for the services of shelters such as the NCWRC shelter.
Statistics for the United States reveal how often battering occurs. Serious public health and
safety problems erupting from domestic violence are legion:
• According the Federal Bureau of Investigation, a woman is beaten every 15
seconds.
• Surgeon General Antonia Novella states that domestic violence causes more
injuries to women than rapes, muggings, and car accidents combined!
• 4,000 women die from domestic violence annually in the United States according
to Florence Forshey, President of the Coalition Against Domestic Violence (CADV).
• 6 deaths as a result of domestic violence have occurred in San Luis Obispo
County since 1984 per Karen Ramsey, Domestic Violence Case Coordinator for the
San Luis Obispo County District Attorney's Victim/Witness Assistance Center
(V/WAC).
DBM:Ci APSHHC\ATASC\93NEEDS.ATS 3
Needs Statement 1993 CDBG Application
City of Atascadero
• Between 400 and 420 spouse abuse cases (penal code 272.5)'' are submitted to
the County's District Attorney's office by local law enforcement agencies
annually. (Exhibit 4.) This does not include numbers for other domestic violence
cases filed under other penal codes such as assault with a deadly weapon, etc.
• The San Francisco Family Violence Project found that 63% of teenage boys
committing murder killed their mother's abuser.
• The FBI reports that 30% of the women murdered in this country were killed by
their husband or boyfriend.
• Two-thirds of abused children come from households where the mother 4s
abused, according to CADV.
• Children in homes where domestic violence occurs are physically abused or
seriously neglected at a rate 1500 percent higher than the national average in the
general population, according to CADV.
And thus the health and safety problems continue from generation to generation:
• Boys who have seen their fathers abuse their mothers are 700 times more likely
to abuse their own spouse/partner than boys who have not witnessed domestic
violence according to Lenore Walker, noted psychologist, researcher, expert witness,
and author of The Battered Woman and Terrifying Love
• V/WAC studies show that approximately 50% of women who are battered and up
to 75% of all men who batter were either abused as children or witnessed abuse
between their parents.
• The majority of violent adult prisoners were raised in violent homes, per CADV.
• CADV reports that children from violent homes have a higher risk of alcohol and
drug abuse and juvenile delinquency.
However, there are no statistics that can show the extent of suffering the victims endure;
like rape, spousal abuse is severely under reported. The FBI suggests multiplying reported
rapes by 10 to get a more accurate count; yet even the FBI's methods produce conservative
statistics. If such abuse were perpetrated against any other group in any other place in
the world, there would be an international outcry against the human rights violations.
DIM 1C:APSHH<'\AI'AS('V93NI*l:DS.n'PS 4
Needs Statement 1993 CDBG Application
City of Atascadero
CDBG funding for Women's Shelter's acquisition and rehabilitation of its current site would
increase the Shelter's capacity to house additional families thus reducing the number of
families turned away. If the Shelter site cannot be acquired, even the existing levels of
service are at risk due to the virtual elimination of of HCD's ESP funding for rent payments.
2. BRIEFLY DESCRIBE AND DOCUMENT THE SERIOUS AND BASIC
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT NEEDS:
The current economic recession, coupled with the last six years of drought, has drastically
slowed the local economy. The local construction industry has been especially hard--hit. The
total value of building permits issued in the City during 1992 was $14.1 millior4 compared
with $26.2 million in 1991. Only 42 single family building permits were issued-from
January to November 1992, compared to 91 in 1991. The median new home price has
dropped 7.5% to $164,700, for the same reporting period. Unemployment in the County
rose to 7.0 percent in December, 1992, up 1.7% since the prior reporting period. The figure
is the highest level of unemployment recorded in the County since February, 1986. The San
Luis Obispo office of the Employment Development Department notes that claims from
construction workers comprised much of the unemployment increase.
A major slowdown in the local economy is also evidenced by the drop in retail sales. Retail
sales tax for fiscal year 1990-91, when compared with fiscal year 1989-90, decreased by 2'
percent. When an inflation factor of 5.8 percent for the period is factored in, the County
actually experienced a decline in real terms of nearly 8 percent.
In the past, the strong employment base in government, education, and large state-run
facilities, such as the California Men's Colony and Atascadero State Hospital, have buffered
both the City and County of San Luis Obispo from negative economic fluctuations at the state
and national level. However, the current state budget crisis will lead to cutbacks by these
employers as well.
3. BRIEFLY DESCRIBE AND DOCUMENT THE SERIOUS AND BASIC PUBLIC
FACILITIES NEEDS:
Capital improvement investments over the next five years will be necessary to maintain
adequate service levels as the City approaches buildout:
• To meet future demand for water, various options and resources will need to be
explored to ensure an adequate water supply; furthermore, a new deep water well will
0
DBN1 i C:\PSHHC\ATASC\93N1:EDS.ATS 5
0000111.1
Needs Statement 1993 CDBG Application
City of Atascadero
need to be drilled also. However, the existing supply meets current demand.
• Concurrent with the expansion of the water supply, the will need to expand sewer
service. Current sewage processing capacity can be easily and cheaply upgraded to
meet short-term growth.
• According to the City's Capital Improvements Plan, the basic public facility needs of
the City are the regular construction and maintenance of infrastructure such as roads,
bridges, and drainage systems. These projects are planned for funding over a five
year time frame to minimize fiscal impacts.
• Two new satellite fire stations are needed to ensure safe response''times.
• The public schools system in Atascadero needs expansion. As of May, 199r, the
capacity of all elementary, junior high, and high schools was 4,542 students;
however, the enrollment was 4,756 students.
• The site of the new county branch library needs to be expanded to provide for library
expansion and off street parking.
These facilities are necessaryto meet current service standards for projected build out of the
P J
city, and to provide adequate infrastructure support for the anticipated expansion in housing_
as the City's population grows. The need for these facilities is documented in the City's
Land Use Element of the General Plan, including revisions through December, 1992.
The funding for these projects is anticipated to come from a variety.of non-CDBG sources,
including utility rates, connection fees, taxes, developers impact fees, parcel tax election,
State school building program, etc.
4. BRIEFLY DESCRIBE AND DOCUMENT THE OTHER SERIOUS
AND BASIC NEEDS:
According to the recently adopted Land Use Element, Atascadero should retain its overall
character and rural atmoshphere with the long-term protection of the environment as a
primary guiding criteria for public policy decisions. The most challenging aspect of this
need is to reverse the strip commercial image of the city.
This is to be accomplished by adhering to a comprehensive planning process that preserves
and protects the character of the community at the same time as protecting the flora, fauna,
and countryside. In addition to land use policies which provide for concentrations of
D13N1IC:APSHHC\A7'ASCV93N1:1 1)8.A"1:S 6
Activity Description 1993 CDBG Application
City of Atascadero
ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION
11. DETAILED ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION:
The proposed Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG) activity is the
acquisition and rehabilitation of new facility for the North County Women's Resource
Center's Domestic Violence Shelter site and facility. Acquisition of the site will provide
long-term financial stability for the Women's Shelter, bypassing high rent payments and,
therefore, providing more resources to stabilize and increase the level of necessary
supportive services. Rehabilitation of the Shelter is also proposed as an activity to serve
more domestic violence victims, especially the physically handicapped and senior victims
heretofore unserved. Rehab will also mitigate health and safety problems such a;
replacing the leaky roof; correct plumbing and electrical system deficiencies, installation of
weatherization measures, and the retrofit of one bathroom and bedroom for handicapped
accessibility.
The proposed emergency shelter site for victims of domestic violence is a duplex home at a
confidential location within the city limits of Atascadero (ref. Map Section). There are two,
three bedroom units separated by two car garages on a 150' x 150' flag lot. According to
Atascadero's Community Development Director, Henry Engen, the Shelter is an allowed use
consistent with the underlying zoning designation (Exhibit 13). There are six bedrooms, two
kitchens, two bathrooms, and two living rooms. One of the six bedrooms will be converted
to on-site office space that can also serve as a private counseling area.
Due to the nature of the services at the shelter, security and confidentiality must always be
considered. This building is perfect for remodeling to fit all of the shelter's confidentiality
and priority needs. The building is not highly visible from the streetbecause of the "flag lot"
configuration. A six foot fence already exists on three sides and a front side will be
constructed to further guarantee privacy. The (California Youth Authority (CYA) has
offered to construct a children's play area; the Economic Opportunity Commission will
weatherize the facility to make it more energy efficient; and the local Kiwanis have pledged
to plant fast growing trees and construct a car port to screen the property and victim's
vehicles from an adjacent two-story apartment building and enhance privacy.
Benefit to the Targeted Income Group
This project will provide 100% benefit to Targeted Income Group (TIG) households (earning
less than 80% of County median income). Residents in a domestic violence shelter are
typically in the lowest Target Income Group (earning less than 50% of County median
income) but for purposes of this application we will estimate that 50% of the residents served
DIM;C:AI'SIIIIC\ATASCV93ACTDES.ATS
Activity Description 1993 CDBG Application
City of Atascadero
will be in the lowest TIG . Women's Shelter residents' incomes are established from
information obtained from all potential residents at initial intake (Exhibit 3) and then verified.
It is important to understand that victims of domestic violence are, traditionally, isolated and
economically dependent women and their children who seek shelter from their batterer after a
crisis of violence. These individuals seeking Shelter services have no resources, financial or
otherwise, or they would have chosen other options. The State Department of Housing and
Community Development has recognized this fact by identifying the acquisition and
rehabilitation of a domestic violence shelter as an activity that serves the "limited clientele"
of battered women and their children and thus assumes 100% TIG.
Significance of Need Addressed Compared to Other Needs €
As stated in the Needs Section of this application, the Land Use Element of the General Plan
and the Capital Improvements Plan outline some of the City's other needs. These needs
include basic city operations such as the construction and maintenance of infrastructure items
such as roads, bridges, schools, and fire stations. The current capacities of these systems are
sufficient for the existing demands. Improvements are planned to be phased in over five year
time frames.
None of the other identified needs has the health and safety ramifications presented by the
dire circumstances in which the shelter program finds itself. If the shelter is unable to
purchase a permanent site with CDBG funds, the program would have to severely limit its
services or, possibly, close its doors. The loss of the North_County Women's Shelter would
have many unforeseen ripple effects throughout the community.
Furthermore, the Housing Element states that the City will encourage and support housing
opportunities for special needs groups and government assisted housing programs. While the
City has consistently addressed housing needs in general, it recognizes the urgency of the
housing needs of a special needs group -- the victims of domestic violence -- by applying for
this funding.
The health and safety needs of its citizens is of upmost importance to the City. The Shelter
addresses not only the immediate health and safety needs of victims of domestic violence and
their children, but the Shelter's supportive programs work to break the vicious generational
"cycle of violence."
The needs that will be addressed by the proposed program are the serious public health and
safety problems that are the result of situations of domestic violence. These health and
safety problems include: death, physical injury, mental health consequences for both victim
DII\I i C:AI'SIIIIC\ATASC\93AC"1'DI:S.ATS
0 00F3� i
Activity Description 1993 CDBG Application
City of Atascadero
and children, and substance abuse. Purchase and rehabilitation of the Women's Shelter will
permanently address these serious health and safety needs by providing:
1. A permanent emergency shelter for victims of domestic violence guaranteed by deed
restriction for a minimum of 30 years. The immediate availability of a shelter away
from the batterer for victims and their children is essential to their safety and well-
being.
2. Handicapped accessibility to domestic violence shelter. The rehabilitation of the
emergency Shelter site will include ramps for access to the building and widening of
doors, hallways, and facilities in one bathroom and bedroom to accommodate the
needs of a wheelchair-bound individual.
3. Financial stability for the Women's Shelter Program which will facilitate the
continued provision of domestic violence supportive services. The secondary effect of
purchase of the site is the elimination of exorbitant $18,000 per year rent payments
which will now allow for the continuation of needed services which were at risk. The
dramatic reduction and potential elimination of the HCD Emergency Shelter
Program rent payment funds would require diversion of otherfunding to rent,
. seriously jeopardizing the provision of support services by Spring of 1994.
Furtherance of State Objectives
The proposed CDBG activity would further the following State objectives:
1. Correction of health and safety deficiencies by guaranteeing the provision of
emergency shelter to victims of domestic violence and their children including
physically handicapped persons and senior citizens.
2. Correction of health and safety deficiencies by financially stabilizing the Women's
Shelter and facilitating the increase and continuation of critical supportive services
provided to domestic violence victims in order to prevent recurrence of violence.
3. Promote energy conservation with the provision of weatherization measures including
attic insulation, weatherstripping, and water heater insulation.
DBNI i C:\PSIDIC\ATASC\93ACIVES.ATS
Activity Description 1993 CDBG Application
City of Atascadero
PROGRAM DESIGN AND EFFECTIVENESS
Detailed Cost Estimate
The cost of acquiring the identified property is $249,000., plus an estimated $48,500 in
rehabilitation work. Two independent real estate companies, and
, were consulted regarding the property acquisition proce. They both
verified the reasonableness of the purchase price based on comprable sales and sales
experience, as demonstrated by their letters of Opinion of Value included in Exhibit 1. The
escrow fees will be donated by Homestead Title. The title insurance, architectural, and legal
costs related to the acquisition are based on estimates provided by People's Self-Help
Housing Corporation, a local non-profit organization with over 20 years experience in
housing development (Exhibit 17). _
F
The home rehabilitation costs are based upon a professional inspection and a work
specification write-up and cost estimate performed by Greg Lampman, a licensed and insured
general contractor specializing in rehabilitation work with over 14 years of experience. A
resume included with the cost estimate demonstrates his vast experience in housing
rehabilitation. (Exhibit 2) All write-ups are based on historical bid data and all work in
the write-ups is designed to eliminate the need for relocation with careful thought to the
timing of required utility shut-offs and the prevention of hazards to children. HCD was
contacted to confirm the fact that prevailing wage rates do not apply to this work.
A licensed, insured general contractor will be selected by State-approved procurement
process to complete the rehabilitation activities. Experience and references in the completion
of roofing, residential remodeling, and other activities identified in the work write up
(Exhibit 2) will be used as a selection criteria.
The following chart represents the amounts and sources of funding (fully detailed in the
"Other Sources of Assistance" section following this narrative committed to the Women's
Shelter activity:
Acquisition Price $249, 000 CDBG
Escrow/Title Policy 2, 500 Homestead Title,
CDBG
Legal 500 CDBG
Architect 2 , 500 CDBG
Building Permits XXX City
weatherization XXXXX EOC
General Rehabilitation 48, 500 CDBG
Cable Service Donation x,xxx Falcon Cable TV
Children' s Center Construction XXXXXX CYA
Painting or play yard?? XXXXXX Kiwanni's
DBN1',C:APSnnC\ATASC\93ACTDES.ATS
00001 ��
Activity Description 1993 CDBG Application
City of Atascadero
maybe build storage shed XX Board of Realtor
donate something XX WRC
Community Thrift Store XX WRC
Total $303, 000
Site Control Assurance
L. Kent Williams, the owner of the identified site agreed to sell the property to the NCWRC
Domestic Violence Shelter. A lease with an Option to Purchase Agreement meeting HCD
requirements was negotiated between the seller and the NCWRC timed to coincide with
CDBG Program funding availability (Exhibit 1). A Preliminary Title Report was also
obtained at the time of purchase negotiations. In order to preserve the contidentiaNty of the
site's location, any identifying references from the report have been deleted. (Elhijit 1)
Degree of Governmental Approval
The proposed activity is the acquisition and rehabilitation of the existing 'property and
construction of one additional structure. No additional levels of governmental approval
(e.g., use permit approval, etc.) are required, as indicated by the letter Henry Engen, the
. City's Community Development Director (Exhibit 13). The Shelter is an appropriate use
for the zoning of the property. The City of Atascadero supports the use of this site as a
shelter.
CDBG Program Implemenation
Although the property will ultimately be purchased and operated as a domestic violence
shelter by the Women's Shelter Program, the City of Atascadero intendsto contract with
Peoples' Self-Help Housing Corporation, a non-profit housing developer'with extensive
Community Development Block Grant program administration and contract compliance
experience, to supervise the site acquisition, rehabilitation, and all related administrative
activities. HCD procurement guidelines will be followed. Peoples' Self-Help Housing
Corporation has indicated its willingness to assist the City with these tasks (Exhibit 17).
A detailed milestone schedule follows:
• Property Negotiations/Option Agreement Completed
0 Rehabilitation Inspection/Estimates Completed
• Preliminary Appraisal/Opinion of ValueCompleted
DIM I C:A1 S1U1C\ATASCV93ACTDES.ATS
Activity Description 1993 CDBG Application
City of Atascadero
• Matching funds & contributions committed Completed
• HCD Awards CDBG Funds to City of Atascadero 7/l/93
• HCD and City Enter Into Grant Agreement 10/1/93
• City Procures Contractor for CDBG Implementation 11/1/93
• City Satisfies Grant Agreement Conditions
Including Environmental Assessment 12/1/93
• City Requests Release of Funds/PAR 12/1/93
• NCWRC Exercises Option to
Purchase/Opens Escrow 3/l/94
• Escrow Closes/Property Transfers to NCWRC
/Regulator Agreement Records 4/1/94
• Volunteer Coordination for Play Area, Carport, Landscape and Painting Begins
5/l/94
• Rehab Procurement/Contractor Selection Begins 7/1/94
• Rehab/Construction "Notice to Proceed" 8/15/94
• Rehab/Construction completion & inspection 3/31/95
• CDBG Closeout 6/30/95
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SHELTER SERVICES
Meeting an Urgent Health and Safety Need
The NCWRC's shelter and local law enforcement together incorporate three necessary
elements that domestic violence experts recognize as an effective method to meet the health
and safety problem of domestic violence. They are:
DIM;C:\PSIQIC\ATASC\93AC1'DES.ATS
Activity Description 1993 CDBG Application
City of Atascadero
1. Emergency shelter for victims of domestic violence. The availability of a shelter for
victims and their children is essential to the immediate safety and well-being of
battered women and their children.
2. Domestic violence supportive services. Medical care for domestic violence injuries
is often necessary. Legal assistance is needed in filing for temporary restraining
orders and possibly separation or divorce. Follow-up psychological help is needed
because battered victims experience emotional and debilitating psychological reactions
similar to survivors of battle (post traumatic stress syndrome). Their children also
suffer from the trauma of violence. Battered women and their children, after leaving
the violent situation, most often have no income or have no access to family income;
they often have transportation problems. In order to help victims break the cycle of
violence, emergency shelter must be augmented by supportive services.
3. Laws against domestic violence strictly enforced. Law enforcement has intervened
into a much greater number of domestic violence situations in recent years as the
result of SB1472, a law passed by the California Legislature (1985) that requires
mandatory reporting of domestic violence calls. This law also lowers the standard of
evidence necessary to make a felony arrest and requires officers to inform victims of
available local services. SB1472 has resulted in many more victims requesting shelter
and related supportive services.
Loss or severe restriction of the emergency shelter site will break the linkage of these
necessary elements and will impact the effectiveness of the entire public response
system.
Since 1985 the NCRWC Women's Shelter goal has been to interrupt the "Cycle of Violence".
and safeguard women and children from the crime of battering. The Shelter provides at no
charge crisis support, emergency housing, and comprehensive services (food, clothing,
transportation, counseling, advocacy, information and referral) to battered women and their
endangered children, thus protecting them from immediate or potential danger in their own
homes.
A family may receive admission to the Shelter 24 hours a day, seven days a week. There is
24-hour crisis line that is staffed by volunteers and Shelter staff. The crisis counselor will
conduct the initial screening either over the phone or at a mutually agreed-upon public place
(e.g., coffee shop). At intake, the counselor will assess the situation to determine whether the
family meets these basic criteria for Shelter eligibility: (1) a physically or psychologically
battered woman (over 18 years) and her children (NOTE: The Shelter does not solicit men
who are victims of domestic violence; however, should a man inquire, he would be housed
elsewhere, and referred to the appropriate agencies.), (2) economic need ''for Shelter, (3)
DBJI I C:AI'SIIIIC\ATASC\93ACTDES.A'1'8
Activity Description 1993 CDBG Application
City of Atascadero
immediate danger of bodily harm, (4) custody of children or no custody papers. If the
domestic violence victim has a transportation problem, the counselor will also arrange
transportation.
Income eligibility will be established from information obtained from the Shelter resident
(Exhibit 3) and all sources will be verified. The Shelter resident total household income
shall not exceed 80% of median-income as established by the Department of Housing and
Community Development.
All Shelter services will remain ongoing at full capacity throughout the CDBG program
activity. The acquisition and rehabilitation activities have been carefully designed not to
interfere with the provision of services. Services offered to "break the chain of vio.nce"
will be more thoroughly discussed in the section, Prevention of Problem Recurr&c(
,following are listed the immediate crisis supportive services provided to shelter residents
through the NCWRC Domestic Violence Shelter.
• Twenty-Four Hour a Day Crisis Hotline. The shelter maintains a 24-hour a day,
seven days a week crisis hotline. A Women's Shelter volunteer/intern/staff carries a
beeper at all times and can be reached by Hotline or directly by law enforcement
agencies, hospitals, or victim/ witness. In one year (FY88/89), the shelter received
2,215 crisis calls from women in trouble; of those, 170 sought the safety of the
shelter.
• Emergency Sheltering Services to Domestic Violence Victims and Their Children. The
NCWRC Domestic Violence Shelter offers emergency shelter services 24 hours per
day, available through the office phone or Hotline. The House Manager is
responsible for the day-to-day operation of the Shelter and resident work schedules.
The Case Manager is responsible for case management and advocacy. The children
are with the Childcare Specialist whenever their mothers are in group counseling and
also at other selected times. All children two years or older receive therapy with the
Shelter's Counselor.
• Emergency Food and Clothing for Domestic Violence Victims and Children. Food and
clothing are provided to all domestic violence victims while they are in the Shelter.
The local community is extremely generous in donating food and clothing to the
Shelter. When a domestic violence victim leaves the Shelter, she is receiving food
stamps, if eligible, and she is given food supplies to start hr in her new home. The
ex-resident can also return to the Shelter for additional food, if she is in need.
• Emergency Response to Calls from Law Enforcement on 24-Hour Basis. The
NCWRC Domestic Violence Shelter serves law enforcement agencies in the North
DRNI C:APSIDIC\ATASC\93ACTDES.ATS
(tl.►O0"',
Activity Description 1993 CDBG Application
• City of Atascadero
County area -- primarily, the City of Atascadero Police Department, the Sheriff, and,
to a small extent, the police departments of other cities in the area such as Paso
Robles. Although the shelter's primary relationship is with the City, it has a good
working relationship with all law enforcement agencies in the County.
• 24-Hour a Dav Response to Domestic Violence Victims in Hospitals and Emergency
Medical Treatment Facilities. The shelter serves the North County's main hospital,
Twin Cities Hospital. The staff/intern/volunteer on duty asks to speak directly to the
domestic violence victim, when possible, and informs the victim of Shelter services
which include counseling on the phone, going to the hospital to assist the victim,
bringing the victim into the Shelter or arranging other safe housing.
• Emergency Transportation to the Shelter or Other Safe Locations and to Vtlk r
Necessary Services. The shelter provides or arranges transportation for all domestic
violence victims entering the Shelter who do not have their own cars. The
staff/volunteer/intern, in the office or on beeper duty, makes plans to meet a victim at
a safe place, e.g., police station. If the victim is unsafe in her home, the person on
duty makes sure law enforcement is called and the victim is then met at the police
station.
The organizational chart, job descriptions, and resumes in Exhibit 7 demonstrate the
complexity of roles and the high level of education and experience of the Shelter
Administrator, Coordinator, Manager, Counselor, Administrative Assistant, volunteers,
interns and Directors. Even more important than the qualifications required of the staff is
the dedication and compassion they bring to the program. These people are all highly
regarded in the community, and contribute to the respct the shelter has earned.
Capacity to Provide Shelter Services
Many different service clubs and groups donate time, food, clothes, and other in-kind
donations to the shelter. In just this last year, donations increased over 60%from almost
$9,000 per year to $13,713.
The NCWRC Women's Shelter Program's a capacity to provide essential; services to victims
of domestic violence is clearly demonstrated by the contributions from federal, state, local,
and private sources (Exhibit 6) that constitute the Shelter's ongoing budget. Due to the
budget deficits and resulting cutbacks in funding to programs across the board, the shelter
has been able to identify and obtain funding from a variety of agencies and programs,
depending on the availability of funds. Some sources such as the Office of Criminal Justice
and Planning, and the Federal Emergency Shelter Grant will not be avaiable at all times.
Additionally, the shelter's sources of incomes for 1992 are listed below:
•
DBN1;C:AI'SIIIIC\ATASC\93ACTDES.A"I'S
(y��fe �a.)
Activity Description 1993 CDBG Application
City of Atascadero
Women's Shelter Program Annual Income
Federal:
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) $11,000.00
Federal Emergency Shelter Grant $32,995.00
State:
Emergency Shelter Program (ESP) $ 6,049.00
Local:
County of San Luis Obispo
Marriage License Fees $16,485.00 ¢
Community Projects $ 8,000.00
City of Atascadero $10,000.00
Donations $13,713.11
Fundraising $ 5,303.80
Counseling $ 3,767.00
United Way $ 3,000.00
In-Kind Donations $ XXXXXXXX
Total: $110,312.91
Annual Budget Detail
FEDERAL
• Federal Emergency Management Agency - Emergency Food and Shelter Program:
$11,000 from FEMA helps the Shelter with food and shelter supplies.
0 Federal Emergency Shelter Grant (FESG): $32,995 in supplemental funds to cover
rent, salaries, and other shelter expenses. This grant is a competitive application
process. The NCWRC shelter program learned of the availability of extra funds in the
program and applied for a grant. The grant was awarded; however, it is unlikely that
such a competitive grant could be successfully obtained on a yearly basis, and
therefore should not be counted in projecting the shelter's future income.
DBN1 C:\PS1111C\ATASC\93AC'11)ES.ATS
ll000II
Activity Description 1993 CDBG Application
City of Atascadero
STATE
• Emergency Shelter Program. Current program funding of $6,049 partially pays for
the Shelter's rent and limited shelter equipment.
LOCAL
• City of Atascadero. In recognition that the residents of the City and its surrounding
rural areas are the primary recipients of the shelters service, the City contributes
$10,000 towards the shelter's operating expenses.
• County Marriage License Fee. $16,485 from fee collections is deposited intq the
Women's Shelter General Fund.
• County of San Luis Obispo. Community projects funding from the County's General
Fund, totaling $8,000, also goes toward shelter operating expenses.
PRIVATE
• • United Way. Designated and undesignated funds totalling $3,000 is spent on staff
salaries, the children's program and payroll taxes. Fiscal year 92/93 is the first year
that the NCWRC shelter obtained funds from the United Way. As the funds from
OCJP and ESP have been reduced, staff has sought out, and applied for, additional
funds to make up the difference of the state cutbacks. Although this is a new funding
source for the NCWRC, even the United Way is not-able to provide substantial
funding; each year, the United Way has a smaller pool of funds to distribute to a
greater number of applicants.
• Donations from Service Clubs and Individuals. Approximately $1',0,000 annually are
deposited into the Women's Shelter General Fund. These funds come from private
individuals and service clubs who want to make charitable contributions. In 1992,
donations increased over 60% to $13,713.11.
• In-Kind Donations. Over $XX,XXX in volunteer time and contributions of food,
clothing, furniture, etc. are a valuable part of the overall budget. The North County
Community Thrift Store donates clothes and furniture. When a shelter client needs
clothes and/or furniture, she is issued vouchers by the shelter staff. Upon presenting
the voucher at the thrift store, she may obtain whatever clothes or other items needed
at no cost to her or the shelter. The annual value of these donations is estimated at
$5,000.???
DB\1 C:\PS1H1C\ATASC\93ACTDFS.ATs
Activity Description 1993 CDBG Application
City of Atascadero
• Counseling - The NCWRC runs a walk-in counseling clinic. Licensed, practicing
MFCC's provide individual and family counseling on a sliding scale basis; these
proceeds return to the NCWRC general operating fund. For 1992, this amount is
3,767.
• Fundraising - Annual events, such as the "Let's Do Lunch" celebrity luncheon and
annual mail campaign, brought in $5,303.80.
Cooperative Agencies' Memorandums of Understanding
In recognition of the services the North County Women's Resource Center Women's Shelter
Program provides and the interdependency required to adequately serve the area's domestic
violence victims, numerous public safety and health organizations have entered JW4
Memorandums of Understanding with the Women's Shelter (Exhibit 5). An example of those
organizations whose cooperation is so necessary to implement a comprehensive array of
domestic violence services include: The HOTLINE of San Luis Obispo; the Atascadero
Police Department; the San Luis Obispo County Sherrif Department; and Twin Cities
Hospital, and the North County Community Thrift Store. This second-hand thrift shop will
accept vouchers from the shelter so that a woman may obtain, free of charge, items such as
clothing and furniture.
The NCWRC Women's Shelter also has a cooperative agreement with the San Luis Obispo
Women's Shelter in the City of San Luis Obispo that serves the residents of the southern San
Luis Obispo County area. Among other things, the North County Shelter and the San Luis
Obispo Women's Shelter agree to accept each others clients.when they are overcrowded.
Unfortunately, the San Luis Obispo shelter is as overcrowded as the NCWRC Women's
Shelter and each rarely has the space to accept the other's overflow.
Other Sources of Assistance
A full range of possible funding sources for the Shelter site acquisition and rehabilitation
were considered along with CDBG.
Sources that proved to be infeasible included:
Conventional Financing was explored at a meeting with a local bank. The Women's
Shelter, because of lack of equity and it's non-profit status, would not be eligible for
a loan large enough to purchase the property or to rehabilitate the existing structures
(Exhibit 19).
DBN1'C:AI'SIIIIC\ATASC\93AC"rDES.A'I'S
Activity Description 1993 CDBG Application
City of Atascadero
Emergency Shelter Program (ESP) monies from Propositions 84 and 107 administered
by the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) were
analyzed as another possible source of revenue for the activity. This allocation is
already a critical portion of the NCWRC Women's Shelter budget; furthermore, the
San Luis Obispo Women's Shelter and the County's Homeless Shelter are other
recipients that share that allocation. However, the County's ESP allocation has
dwindled from $93,000 in 1991 to just $12,000 in 1992 and will probably not
continue in 1993 (Exhibit 20).
McKinney Act funding through the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
and Federal Emergency Shelter Grant (FESG) Programs was also thoroughly
considered as a possible source of financing the Shelter acquisition and rehabilitation.
FEMA can be utilized for a variety of community needs with meals, tra&pgrtation,
utility and rent payments, staff salaries, and other items eligible for funding. Because
so many activities are eligible, the County's FEMA allocation is already received
through the County FEMA Board's cooperative application and negotiation process by
seven service agencies including the NCWRC Women's Shelter (Exhibit 20).
Requesting FEMA funding larger than the Shelter's annual allocation already utilized
in it's ongoing program would seriously jeopardize the critical services of the other
six recipients and is, therefore, not a competitive application. The FESG is a
statewid competitive application that funds shelter operations and excludes site
acquisition as an eligible activity.
Sources that can be utilized include;
LIST OUT HERE A NARRATIVE OF WHICH PRIVATE GROUPS BARBARA
HAS LINED UP
Local Charitable Contributions were considered and can be utilized for a portion of
the proposed activity. Even though the NCWRC receives approximately $XX,XXX a
year in private donations, those funds are crucial to the ongoing shelter services.
Activity specific funding has been solicited, with positive results: Homestead Title
has agreed to donate the escrow and title fees associated with the purchase of the
shelter site; Mr./Ms. , a local realtor, has generously agreed to
donate his/her services related to the purchase, in the amount of ; the
California Youth Authority has agreed to build or paint which is worth
; the Kiwanni's are going to build or paint, which is worth
the Economic Opportunity Commission's Weatherization Program will
install energy saving devices worth a total of ; the City of Atascadero
will donate the expenses related to the annual audit of the grant and staff time
associated with administering the grant; Falcon Cable has agreed to donate free cable
DBN1;C:APSIIIIC\ATASCV93AC11)GS.A"1'S
Activity Description 1993 CDBG Application
City of Atascadero
television service so that the children at the shelter have access to educational
programming; the value of that donation is estimated at ; and the
NCWRC itself and the North County Community Thrift Store have pledged
A thorough financial analysis made it increasingly clear that the Community Development
Block Grant Program was the most appropriate primary financing source for the proposed
acquisition and rehabilitation activities. Without CDBG funds, the NCWRC Women's
Shelter would not be able to purchase the site identified through the Planning and Technical
Assistance Grant; furthermore, they would not be able to remain in the current after the lease
expires. Because ESP, the funding source traditionally used for rent, has been draVatically
reduced and may be discontinued, the financial stability of the Women's Sherfer Is
threatened without CDBG funding to acquire a permanent site. Funds for counseling
and other services cannot be siphoned away to pay rent. If the Women's Shelter were
forced to dramatically reduce its shelter services, there may be no alternative for many
Domestic Violence victims and their children but to stay in the war zone of their
household, further endangering their lives.
Local Community Support
A wide spectrum of local organizations; jurisdictions; and health, law enforcement, special
service and mental health agencies strongly support the NCWRC Domestic Violence Shelter
and the proposed CDBG project (Exhibit 4 or 5, depending). Letters from experts in the
field describing the direct health and safety impact on victims of domestic violence that
would result from the loss of the emergency domestic shelter can be reviewed in Exhibit 4 of
this application.
Environmental Impacts
The acquisition and rehabilitation of an existing building on a multi-family zoned site will
encounter no environmental problems. The anticipated level of environmental clearance on
the statutory checklist is "categorically excluded from NEPA and categorically excempt from
CEQA".
DBNt,C:APSIIIIC\ATASC\93AC"1'DES.ATS
()(}(}4t`3`t
Activity Description 1993 CDBG Application
City of Atascadero
Leverage of Private Funds
ONCE WE HAVE CONFIRMED PLEDGES, REWRITE TO REFLECT ACCORDINGLY
The leverage of $XXXXXX in private funds from local contributors for the CDBG activity
of shelter site acquisition and rehabilitation has already been detailed in the Other Sources of
Assistance section of this application. Project specific cash contributions for the activity
through the NCWRC and the in-kind donation of labor from the Kiwanis Club will complete
construction of the Children's Center. The Board of Realtors will provide all labor and
materials equivalent to approximately $XXXXX to construct a children's';play yard. Falcon
Cable TV will donate cable television services for the education of the children at the center.
In addition, discussion in "Domestic Violence Shelter Services" of the Program Deign and
Effectiveness section, details more than $ that has been leveragedalf6d ongoing
shelter services through private cash and in-kind contibutions and UnitedWay funding.
Cost Per Household Benefited
As previously detailed in the Program Design and Effectiveness section's`` Detailed Cost
Estimate, the total CDBG shelter acquisition and rehabilitation activity will cost $XXXXXX.
The acquisition price of the project is based upon the Purchase Agreement (Exhibit 1)
between the Women's Shelter and the property owner, L. Kent Williams: An appraiser's
and a real estate company's Opinion of Value (Exhibit 1) justifies the puchase price. Soft'
costs (escrow fees, legal fees, Title Insurance), estimated by Peoples' Self-Help Housing
Corporation, were based upon completion of similar projects. An experienced, licensed
general contractors estimated the rehabilitation costs (Exhibit 2).
The duration of the CDBG program activity is calculated at 24 months from July, 1993
(estimated execution date of HCD Grant Agreement) to June, 1995 (estimated CDBG close-
out). The Women's Shelter maintains maximum occupancy at all times. The shelter has six
bedrooms with three to four beds per room. Shelter policy dictates that only one household
(mother and children) is assigned to each bedroom. Although a stay at the Shelter might
range from one night to a sixty day maximum, the average stay is twelve days. As detailed
in the chart below a total of 240 Target Income Group (TIG) households'will be served
during the duration of the CDBG program. As previously discussed, the City can reasonably
estimate that 50% of the TIG served (or 120 households) will be in the lowest income
category based on the Women's Shelter's experience. In 1992, the shelter served 82
households, and 30 were turned away. In the larger facility, the shelter will be able to hold
at a minimum the amount of households served plus those turned away last year. It is
important to note, however, that the facilities acquired and rehabilitated during the
CDBG program are permanent and will benefit a minimum of 110 TIG households a
DBNI 1 C:AI'SIIIIC\ATASC\93ACTDES.A'rS
1993 CDBG Application
Activity Description City of Atascadero
year in perpetuity.
following are calculations of the number of Targeted Income Group households to
The fo g
benefit from the Shelter:
Households To Benefit From Shelter
(24-Month Period)
Total number of bedrooms: 5
Average number of households 5
Projected Average length of stay
2 weeks
5 HH (@ 1/2 mo/ea) x 24 mos 240 total Households Served
Average persons per household: 1
Total persons served: 312
TOTAL VERY-LOW INCOME HOUSES OLDS050% x 40 120 20
TOTAL LOW-INCOME HOUSEHOLD
Program deliver costs of $24,500 requested from CDBG equates to 7.49% of the CDBG
P twit y suggested guidelines. The $26,500 in general administration funds
activity, well within the
requested are also within CDBG guidelines at 7.49% of activity.
Prevention of Problem Recurrence
Services Preventing Problem. Recurrence
in the Shelter property, the North County Women's ourcor ve servicesenter will that
tain
In purchasing
long-term financial stability and thereby maintain essential program
p for example)
could have been discontinued as critical dfun Supportive(E(Emergency
servShelter
ces t such as victim and children's
were reduced and, potentially, eliminate legal assistance with
counseling, referrals to financial support agencies, job re-entry,
shm
Temporary orar Restraining Orders and custody disputes, and husehldv o abli vi ent are even,
help to break the cycle of domestic violence. If needed, domestic
pgNl;G\I'SItllCAA fASC
\y3AC11)ES.ATS
Activity Description 1993 CDBG Application
City of Atascadero
assisted in court when testifying against the batterer. Facilitating the victim's self confidence
and financial stability enabling her to establish a safe home away from the batterer is the best
prevention of problem recurrence. Children's counseling can break the "cycle of violence"
and prevent another generation of abusers and victims. The NCWRC supportive services
listed below work with the domestic violence victim toward that goal of independence and
self-sufficiency:
0 Counseling to Domestic Violence Victims. Individual and
peer group counseling is provided to domestic violence victims by the NCWRC either
through the Shelter, outreach, or referral and is available to residents, ex-residents,
and TIG community members at risk of domestic violence. Individual counseling for
the women is also provided in-house by the counselor, interns and other staff. As
staff time permits, former residents return for individual counseling. #_
P
• Business Center Which is Accessible to All Domestic Violence Victims in Need of
Services. The NCWRC has a business center away from the confidential Shelter site,
located at 8145 El Camino Real, in the City of Atascadero. It has easy access by bus
or foot. The office is off the street behind another business which adds to the safety.
The business office is used as a drop-off point for donations thereby maintaining the
• secrecy of the Shelter site. Individual counseling sessions and one evening support
group take place in the business office.
• Counseling to the Children of Domestic Violence Victims. -
Services are provided to the children of domestic violence victims';residing at the
Shelter through the Children's Program. The Children's Programwas started in 1986
and has continued to grow and develop. The Shelter also has a formal counseling
program for the children over two years of age. Referrals are made to appropriate
agencies. In cases of suspected sexual abuse, testing is done through SART (Sexual
Assault Response Team).
• Court and Social Service Advocaa,for Domestic Violence
Victims. The Women's Shelter Program has a policy of offering court and social
service advocacy for all residents and TIG non-residents or former residents, when
appropriate, and based on available staff time. The Program Coordinator gives
referrals for lawyers and helps residents set up an appointment with the Domestic
Violence Temporary Restraining Order Clinic. The Case Manager accompanies
residents to court. At the courthouse, precautionary safety measures are taken, e.g.,
asking the bailiff's assistance, when deemed necessary. The Administrative Assistant
is responsible for coordinating the Domestic Violence Temporary' Restraining Order
Clinic and scheduling lawyers and paralegals to volunteer their time.
DIM C:AI'SIIIIC\ATASC\93ACTDES.A"fS
000 �,r
Activity Description 1993 CDBG Application
City of Atascadero
• Legal Assistance with Temporary Restraining Orders (TROs)
and Custody Disputes for Domestic Violence Victims. The Women's Shelter Program
provides legal assistance to TIG individuals through referrals. The need for TROs for
Domestic Violence victims has become increasingly apparent. With the combined
efforts of California Rural Legal Assistance, Victim/Witness, Central Coast Legal
Assistant's Association, the San Luis Obispo County Bar Association, County Clerk,
and Superior Court Judges, the TRO Clinic was able to open in February 1990 under
the Women's Shelter Program's non-profit status.
• Participation in Local Community Service Network to Ensure
Appropriate Response to Domestic Violence Victim's Needs. The NCWRC Women's
Shelter Program does extensive networking with local community Social Service
agencies. United Way has a monthly meeting attended by representatives of all
agencies which is attended by the Executive Director. San Luis Obispo Child Abuse
Prevention Program's monthly meetings are attended by the Childcare Specialist. The
Dept. of Social Services sponsors a monthly Homeless Service Providers meeting,
attended by the Case Manager. The monthly interagency council is attended by the
Executive Director. The Women's Shelter receives referrals from Hotline, hospital
emergency rooms, private doctors, County Mental Health, Victim/Witness, Rape
Crisis, churches, and individuals. The Shelter makes referrals to the above-mentioned
agencies as well as lawyers, Sexual Assault Response Team, the Housing Authority of
the City of San Luis Obispo, UVS Thrift Store, Family Support Services, Family
Service Center, Beth David Counseling, Abused Children's Treatment Services and-
Youth Services (Mental Health), San Luis Obispo Child Development Center, EOC
Childcare Resource Center and Transitions.
• Household Establishment Assistance to Domestic Violence
Victims. The Women's Shelter Program provides assistance to domestic violence
victims to establish a new residence. The Shelter receives generous community
donations of furniture and household items, which are given to the Shelter residents.
Volunteers with pickup trucks offer to assist in moving furniture. A local bed shop
donates beds. Advocacy with prospective landlords is offered and transportation and
child care is furnished while the mother is house hunting.
Ongoing Service Funding
The Women's Shelter's ability to sustain itself without CDBG funding beyond the 1992 Grant
Award will be greatly enhanced since the CDBG funds are utilized for site acquisition and
rehabilitation which will stabilize the Shelters funding in perpetuity. No CDBG funds are
utilized for the provision of ongoing services; in fact, the elimination of the exorbitant and
ever increasing rent paymentwill actually increase the Shelter's ability to provide ongoing
i
DBNI I C:\I'SIUIC\ATASC\93AC"IT)ES.ATS
Activity Description 1993 CDBG Application
City of Atascadero
services. The ongoing funding of support services is discussed in great detail in the Program
Design and Effectiveness section of this application.
Site Regulatory Assurances
As a condition of granting CDBG funds, the City of Atascadero will require the NCWRC
Women's Shelter Program to enter into a Regulatory Agreement recorded on the property
ensuring the provision of emergency shelter services for victims of domestic violence on the
property for 30 years. The Regulator Agreement will:
(a) Require that the property remain reserved for use of victims of domestic violence for
at least 30 years from the date of acquisition. 3
(b) Require that if the NCWRC Domestic Violence Shelter fails to uphold its Bylaws, the
property will be transferred to another non-profit who will fulfill the needs of victims
of domestic violence.
(c) Be monitored by the City of Atascadero Community Development Department or its
designee. Additionally, compliance with the Regulatory Agreement may be
monitored by representatives of the State of California.
(d) State that conditions affecting the real property subject to the Agreement shall be
recorded and run with the land.
A draft Regulatory Agreement for the project is included in Exhibit 12 of this application. A
final Agreement based on this draft will be prepared and submitted for HCD review and
approval as part of the program implementation.
Complementary Local Government Action.
To demonstrate it's support of the proposed CDBG activity, the City of Atascadero's general
funds will cover the cost of all permits and fees required for the rehabilitation and
construction work. In addition, the City will donate $300 in in-kind audit expenses (Exhibit
___). The estimated fees and in-kind donations are discussed in greater detail in the Other
Sources of Assistance section of this application.
DBM I C:\PSIDIC\ATASC\93ACTDES.ATS
00010 A
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL Meeting Date: 03/23/93
CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item: D-1
Through: Andy Takata, Assistant City Manager
From: Lee Raboin, City Clerk
SUBJECT:
Amending Section 2-13.03 of the Atascadero Municipal Code as it relates to
term expiration dates for City Parks & Recreation Commissioners.
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt Ordinance No. 268 on second reading.
BACKGROUND:
On March 9, 1993, the City Council unanimously approved the introduction of
Ordinance No. 268 amending term expiration dates for the City's Parks & Recreation
Commissioners. This matter is back for final reading and adoption.
Attachments: Ordinance No. 268
000 q f
ORDINANCE NO. 263
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA
AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 252, SECTION 2-13.03
OF THE ATASCADERO MUNICIPAL CODE
AMENDING PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSIONER TERMS
The City Council of the City of Atascadero does ordain as
follows:
Section 2-13 . 03 is amended to read as follows:
Section 2-13.03. Members: Appointment: Terms of Office.
The City Council shall appoint members of the P.**
and Recreation Commission by a majority vote of the en-
tire Council. There shall be seven (7 ) regular members
of the Commission. The terms of four (4 ) of the regular
members shall expire on September 1, 1994 , and every four
(4 ) years thereafter. The terms of three (3) of the
regular members shall expire on September 1, 1996, and
every four (4 ) years thereafter. Vacancies on the
Commission occurring other than by expiration of term
shall be filled in the manner established for
appointments. All members shall serve at the pleasure of
the City Council.
Publication:
The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published once
within fifteen ( 15) days after its passage in the Atascadero News,
a newspaper of general circulation, printed, published and circula-
ted in the City in accordance with Section 36933 of the Government
Code; shall certify the adopting and posting of this ordinance and
shall cause this ordinance and this certification, together with
proof of posting, to be entered into the Book of Ordinances of the
City.
Effective Date:
This ordinance shall go into effect and be in full force and
effect at 12 : 01 a.m. on the 31st day after its passage.
ORDINANCE
Page Two
On motion by Councilmember seconded by Council-
member , the foregoing ordinance is approved by the
following roll-call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ADOPTED:
CITY OF ATASCADERO
By:
ROBERT P. NIMMO, Mayor
ATTEST:
LEE RABOIN, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ARTHER R. MONTANDON, City Attorney
0001017
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item: n-2
Through: Andy Takata, Assistant Meeting Date: 03/23/93
City Manager
From: Henry Engen, Community Development Director 4!1(,,
SUBJECT:
Request to support the Land Conservancy of San Luis Obispo County' s
grant application for a Highway 101 Landscaping Enhancement and
Gateway Signage Program.
RECOMMENDATION•
Approval of the attached Resolution No. 17-93 supportin% tle Land
Conservancy' s Transportation Enhancement Funding Agpkcation
through the County of- San Luis Obispo.
BACKGROUND:
The attached project proposal,accompanying Resolution No. 17-93,
has been submitted by Mr. Ed Ward on the behalf of the Land
Conservancy of San Luis Obispo County. They are seeking individual
City' s support as a prerequisite to proceeding with an application
from the County of San Luis Obispo for a Transportation Enhancement
Funding Application. This program is a component of the federal
Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act ( ISTEA) of 1991 .
The essentials of the program are that the project must enhance the
transportation experience, such as : billboard removal, historic
preservation and scenic easement acquisition. They provide for
grants of $300, 000 or more; 88% of which is reimbursable from the
Federal Government.
COMMUNITY GOALS:
The City' s General Plan Technical Appendix contains a report that
has previously been transmitted to Caltrans entitled Landscape
Deficiency Study: US Highway 101, which identifies areas "where
landscaping and screening is desired to enhance the appearance of
the community from the freeway" . Moreover, the City' s General Plan
calls for implementation of the freeway landscape plan prepared by
the City for properties lying between E1 Camino Real and Highway
101 . Under conservation policies, the General Plan includes a
policy to "Beautify the City' s entryways. The freeway, and other
vehicular approaches to Atascadero shall be made more attractive
through judicious application of the elements of landscaping and
site development (i.e. , setbacks, building locations, signs and
vacant space) . "
0001"
City staff has sought, in the past, to negotiate with Caltrans to
provide for more effective and aesthetic signage to identify the
community and its ' assets . More recently, the Economic Round Table
has focused on the need for enhancing the City' s entryway signage
and has worked with the City to convince Caltrans of the need to
resolve this problem.
PROPOSED LAND CONSERVANCY PROJECT:
Project description attached to the Resolution proposes to develop
the regional landscape design theme for the 101 corridor while
creating distinctive solutions for each town and rural sector along
Highway 101 . Similarly, original graphics for communication of
"place and regional features" is proposed. In speaking to project
sponsors, staff stressed that Atascadero would generally support
the goals in the work program given the policy language in the
City' s General Plan, but that there would need to be a local
consultation, review and approval process before any qpecific
projects were to be implemented in the City.
FISCAL IMPACT•
At this point the sponsors are proposing a project which would cost
$300, 00, overall, 88% federal monies and 12% local. It is proposed
that the City of Atascadero' s share be tentatively kept at
approximately $2, 000 per year. The County would administer the
project.
HE:ph
Encls : Draft Resolution No. 17-93
RESOLUTION NO. 17-93
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ATASCADERO SUPPORTING THE LAND CONSERVANCY OF
SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY' S FUNDING APPLICATION FOR A
HIGHWAY 101 CORRIDOR AESTHETIC ENHANCEMENT PROJECT FOR
THE TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT ACTIVITIES PROGRAM UNDER THE
INTERMODAL SURFACE TRANSPORTATION EFFICIENCY ACT OF 1991
WHEREAS, the United States Congress has enacted the Intermodal
Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991, which is intended to
provide over $200 million federal dollars over a six year period as
matching funds to local, state and federal agencies and nonprofit
entities for transportation enhancement activities; and
WHEREAS, the California Department of Transportation has
established the procedures and criteria for reviewing p:ojDsals,
and is required to submit to the California TransportationCommis-
sion a list of recommended projects from which the recipients will
be selected; and
WHEREAS, the City of Atascadero' s General Plan includes imple-
mentation of a proposed landscaping plan for Highway 101, which has
been prepared and incorporated in the General Plan; and
iWHEREAS, the City has long been desirous of, providing for
enhanced and attractive community entryway signage; and
WHEREAS, the Land Conservancy of San Luis Obispo County has
prepared a project proposal to further such ends County-wide; and
WHEREAS, the Council of Atascadero supports such goals subject
to consultation, review and approval of the project proposals
specific to the City of Atascadero; and
WHEREAS, the Land Conservancy is in need of support by local
Resolutions for submission to the San Luis Obispo Council of
Governments and County of San Luis Obispo as Administering Agent;
NOW THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Atascadero resolves
as follows :
1 . Supports the filing of an application by the Land Con-
servancy for the Transportation Enhancement Activities
Program for consideration for funding.
2 . Designates the Community Development Director as repre-
sentative for the City in undertaking) this project
proposal.
Resolution No. 17-93
Page 2
On motion by Councilman , and seconded by Council-
man , the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in
its entirety on the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ADOPTED:
CITY OF ATASCADERO
t
By:
ROBERT P. NIMMO, Mayor
ATTEST:
EE RAB it Clerk
L IN O , City
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ARTHER MONTANDON, City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
HENRY ENGEN, Director
Community Development
00011'.1
Land Conservancy of San LLl1S Obispo County
TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT FUNDING APPLICATION
A HIGHWAY 101 CORRIDOR AESTHETIC ENHANCEMENT
PROJECT PROPOSAL
I. OVERALL PROJECT
Description: Design and implement both a regional thematic and community tailored.
landscaping, and informational signage approach within the 101 corridor Right-of-Way and
Use of plant materials and landscape design to:immediate foreground. Develop a
integrated jurisdictional approach to conserve the Use of plant materials and landscape
design to:aesthetic resource inherent in the rural and town landscapes within the larger
corridor viewshed. Implementation would be scheduled over several funding cycles.
Justification: Enhance the aesthetic experience of moving through The Ccunty's major
corridor space and enjoyment of its landscape amenities for both residents andgtravelers.
Enhance awareness and appreciation of the diversity of the region's physical settings and.
communities within the corridors. Communicate a helpful, friendly, and pleasant message
to visitors and travelers. Essentially an investment in quality of life fundamental to
residents and an important visitor economy.
Opportunities: While formally unpublished, a number of the 101 Aesthetic Resource
Study recommendations have been incomorated in public policy. This completed study of
the entire Highway 101 corridor and its viewsheds, encompasses extensive analysis and
citizen involvement in defining attributes and character of its rural and town landscapes,
and strengths and weaknesses of developed change. The study provides the means for
focusing on design specifics and to build on its supporting foundation.
Active design and implementation participation by Cal Trans District 5 Office offers
opportunity for cooperative partnership with jurisdictions to jointly establish a landscape
design and approach to informational signage that reflects a local "look" as much as a Cal
Trans "look". And the opportunity to pool landscape funds. Cal Trans Adopt-A-Highway
Program could be a model for resident and business involvement in landscape planting to
help reduce project costs.
Achieving a common context for jurisdictional policy ends such as design guidelines, scenic
easements and greenbelts, and effective use of a variety of means to achieve larger ends d
represent an opportunity for effective partnership.
II. PROJECT GOALS & TASKS
Landscape Design
1. Create a regional landscape design theme to the 101 corridor, incorporating existi.ng
landscaping with the new.
�. Create a distinctive palette for each town and rural sector within a regionally unified
theme framework.
�. L, . 7i) X 06 • In Lit is 0hIspO. A -� 3406 0
Goals:
Use of plant materials and landscape design to:
a. Provide a unity and style that expresses the "look" of SLO County;
b. Express the natural diversity of the region's landscapes;
c. Strengthen town sense-of-place through distinctive design and "gateway" plantings;
d. Enhance aesthetic enjoyment through seasonal changes, continuity of plant
materials, framing views, screening lower quality views, and softening of hard
development edges; and
e. Improve the integration of the highway with its larger rural and town landscapes
by softening highway R.O.W. fence lines.
I Introduce an ecological approach to landscape design and its implementation with use of
native plants, including grasses and other "appropriate sustainable plants (net necessarily
endemics).
Goals: Ultimately provide sustainability by use of plants with low water and.
maintenance requirements, and a better "fit" with regions's natural plant
communities.
Signage Design
4. Create a unified architectural expression to all informational signage (except Cal Trans
signage), billboards,place and feature signs, and screen fencing.
5. Design of original graphics for communication of place and regional features (i.e. dunes,
wine country, etc.)
5. Develop a strategy to both remove and consolidate billboards, and an alternative
architectural and graphic integration of business advertising of direct informational
relevance to travelers and visitors.
Goals:
a. Eventually eliminate the negative scenic impacts of excessive billboards and or
collective disjunctive design;
b. Lessen the considerable costs of removing billboards;
c. Create a positive and distinctive architectural and graphic style to signage;
d. Uniquely communicate major regional features to visitors; and
e. Strengthen sense of place.
Viewshed Context
7. Designation of critically needed scenic easements and costs, initial landowner contact.
S. Definition of town greenbelts and basis for implementing.
?. Critique and refinement of 101 aesthetic resource study recommendation. for
00W " "I
jurisdictions. Testing of rural design guidelines; refinement and broadening where
necessary regarding "fitting" new development into rural landscapes.
10. Coordinate results of this grant with existing public policy to obtain Scenic Highway
Designation (Highway 101 in SLO County now eligible).
Goals:
a. Maintain distinctions between town and countryside and separation between
towns;
b. Maintain major scenic views;
c. Conserve aesthetic resource associated with town and rural character as essence
of region's physical amenities and "look";
d. Achieve greater fit of development with its physical settings; and
e. Obtain Scenic Highwav status for the corridor for prestige and visitor economy
contribution.
III. APPROACH AND COSTS S
1. Assemble a design team including Cal Trans designers, with needed talents and skills to
complete the defined tasks within one year. The County Government as public sponsor
and The Land Conservancy are responsible for management of project.
2. Conduct community workshops for response to design ideas and vision for the corridor
and determine whether the benefits justify the costs of implementation.
3. Directly connect the major overall project task components - landscape, signage, and
viewshed with its implementation costs and requirements; treat as distinct projects that can
be phased over several years.
4. Tailor project implementation to jurisdictional differences in situations and needs.
5. The first funding cycle for 1993 is proposed to carry out all the project design tasks and
landscape design implementation for extensive jurisdictional screening needs (as defined in
the Hwy 101 Aesthetic Resource Study). This Phase 1 of the overall project would be for a
two year period, with additional implementation funding applied for August 1, 1994 and.
subsequent funding cycles thereafter. Total project costs are tentatively estimated to be
S300.000.
Federal monies provide for 88% of total project costs with the local share of 12% required
as cash. Phase 1 would have a $36,000 local share. It is suggested that jurisdictional shares
be kept at approximately $2,000 per year for cities and S8,000 per year for the County.
0001" ,