Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 02/25/1985 AGENDA - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting February 25, 1985 at 7:30 P.M. Atascadero Administration Building Call to Order Pledge of Allegiance Invocation Roll Call Public Comments City Council Comments A. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Item A, Consent Calendar, are considered to be routine, and will be enacted by one motion in the form listed below. There will be no separate discussion of these items. If discussion is required, that item will be removed from the Consent Calendar and will be considered separately. Vote may be by roll call. 1. Minutes of the Regular Meeting of February 12, 1985 2. Treasurer ' s Report - January 1 - 31, 1985 (RECOMMEND APPROVAL) 3. Finance Director ' s Report, January 1 - 31, 1985 (RECOMMEND APPROVAL) 4. Final Parcel Map AT-810305 :1, 13505 Old Morro Road (Ptn. Lot 7, Block 95) , Fortington/Hil� liard Surveys (RECOMMEND ACCEPTANCE) 5. Final Parcel Map 26-84, 8200 Los Osos Road (Lot 19, Block 37) , Nimmo/Twin Cities Engineering (RECOMMEND ACCEPTANCE) 6. Final Lot Line Adjustment 6-84 , 8375 Los Osos Road (Lots 14 & 15, Block 37) , Estes/Westland Engineering - (RECOMMEND ACCEPTANCE) B. HEARINGS, APPEARANGES AND REPORTS • 1. Public Hearing to consider the Planning Commission Report and Recommendation on: (A) General Plan Amendment 1C-85, 8800 El Centro Ave. (Lot 24 , Block 4) , Michael Yeomans/Joseph Lindsey (Amending the Land Use Element 0 • Map Designation from Moderate Density Single Family Residential to Low Density Multiple Family Residential, • and (B) Amending the Zoning from RSF-Y Single Family Residential to RMF (6) PD Multiple Family Residential Planned Development Overlay '(24 dwelling units) (Pro- posed Revised Resolution 11-85) (Cont'd from 2/12/85) 2. Public Hearing to Consider Zone Change 1-85 - Request Initiated by Planning Commission to Revise the Zoning Ordinance Text Modifying the Rear Setback Requirement in Commercial and Industrial Zones which are Adjacent to Residential Zones, to Allow Waiving the Ten-Foot Setback for Buildings, or Portions of Buildings, Twelve-Feet in Height or Less Within 10-Feet of the Rear Property Line (Proposed Ordinance No. 98) C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS I,I 1. Report from the Reorganization Committee - Verbal 2. Police Facility Recommendations - Combined Reports by Police and Public Works Departments (Proposed Resolution 13-85) 3. Proposed Resolution 14-85 General Plan Amendment 1B-85 , 1875 El Camino Real (Lot 31, Block 49) , H.L.S. Properties Ltd./Associated Professions - Amending the • Land Use Element Map Designation from Suburban Single Family Residential to Retail Commercial (Neighborhood Commercial) (Cont'd from 12/12/85) 4. Proposed Resolution 15-85 - Initiate Proceedings for Approving Annexation Number 3 5. Proposed Resolution 16-85 - Approving Annexation Number 4 to the City of Atascadero (Wastewater Treatment Plant) D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Mid-Year Budget Review - Set Date for Study Session 2. Dial-A-Ride Publicity Advertisement and Cost 3. Recommendation of Recreation Advisory Board Addressing the Naming of South Atascadero Park (Proposed Resolution No. 17-85) 4. Discussion and Recommendation concurning Bid No. 84-24, Rennovation Administration Building - Phase II • E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION i. City Council 2. City Attorney 0 • 3. City Clerk 4. City Treasurer • S. City Manager NOTE: There will be a closed session to consider property acquisition. An announcement is not anticipated after the closed session. • MINUTES - ATASCADERO CIPCOUNCIL ONCIL MEETING: 2/2r,/85 Regular Meeting February 12, 1985 AGENPA ITEM NO, : A 1 Atascadero Administration Building •age 1 The regular meeting was called to order at 7 : 30 p.m. by Mayor Nelson. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited. Invocation was given by Cal Stratton of the Church of the Nazarene. ROLL CALL Present: Councilman Molina and Handshy, Councilwoman Norris and Mackey and Mayor Nelson. Absent: None STAFF Ralph Dowell, Acting City Manager and City Treasurer; Allen Grimes, City Attorney; Grigger Jones, City Clerk.; Georgia Ramirez, Deputy City Clerk; Bud McHale, Police Chief; Mike Hicks, Fire Chief; Henry Engen, Planning Director; John Wallace, Contract Engineer; and Bob Best, Recreation Director. PUBLIC COMMENT Councilman Molina asked to be excused due to a possible conflict of interest. rsula M. Bahl, 7380 Valle Avenue, spoke regarding her concerns regarding a rainage problem on Valle Avenue. Mayor Nelson asked her to talk to Henry ngen, Planning Director. _ Joe Nile spoke concerning the number of multiple dwelling buildings that are going up in town. He thinks there should be more factories built for people to work in. Councilwoman Mackey said she is not in favor of factories being built. Mayor Nelson said there is a need for clean industry in the City of Atascadero. Bill Rempel said that Atascadero is lacking in locationsfor industry. A. CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Minutes of the Regular Meeting of January 28, 1985. 2. Minutes of the Atascadero City Council and Planning Commission of January 28, 1985_ 3. Tentative Parcel Map 30-84, 9755 San Marcos Rd. , Idler/Biathrow (RECOMMEND ACCEPTANCE OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) 4 . Final Lot Line Adjustment 15-84, 8800 Santa Rosa Rd. , (Lots 17 & 18 , Block 19 AT 84-286) , Molina/Kenealy Engineering (.RECOMMEND • ACCEPTANCE) -1- MINUTES - ATASCADERO CI COUNCIL Regular Meeting February 12, 1985 Atascadero Administration Building Page 2 Councilman Molina asked to be excused due to conflict of interest on Item 4 . MOTION: By Councilwoman Mackey, seconded by Councilman Handshy to approve items A 1-4 of the Consent Calendar. Passed 4 : 0 by roll call vote with Councilman Molina excused. B. HEARINGS, APPEARANCES, AND REPORTS 1. Report of Committee for Reorganization Councilman Molina reported that the committee is considering the following possibilities: 1. Reorganization of the Planning Commission from 7 to 5 members; 2. Reorganization of the Recreation Advisory Board from 7 to 5 members; 3 . Combining the Police and Fire into a Public Safety Department; - 4 . Creating the position of Assistant City Manager and Director of Personnel; 5. Combining the Parks Department with the Recreation Department; 6. Restructuring of the Public Works Department; 7. Restructuring of the Planning/Building Department. This committee anticipates to have one, two or three final recom- mendations for the Council to consider at the next meeting. Councilwoman Mackey asked what the rationalization is for elimina- ting two members of the Planning Commission and the Recreation Advisory Board. Councilman Molina responded that the committee feels in order to streamline and to make the commissions more efficient, it would be necessary to change from 7 to 5 members. Mayor Nelson said that in order to be fair to the people in the audience, he would like to move Item4 to Item 2 . 2. General Plan Amendment 1C-85, 8800 E1 Centro Ave. , (Lot 24, Block 4) r Michael Yomans/Joseph Lindsey - (Amending the Land Use Element Map Designation from Moderate Density Single Family Residential to Low Density Multiple Family Residential/Amend Zoning from RSF-Y Single Family Residential to RMF (6) PD Multiple Family Residential Planned Development Overlay (6 units .per acre) Mayor Nelson said that because an additional change was received late last week, he didn't feel that this could be considered a propel public hearing and that the Council did not have enough time to look at the changes and understand the changes that had been made by the applicant. Further, there was a .tie vote when the commission considered this project. He recommended that it be sent back to the Planning Commission for a firm recommendation at their February 19th meeting and then brought back to the Council at the next Council Meeting. MINUTES - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL • Regular Meeting • February 12, 1985 Atascadero Administration Building Page 3 The members of the council agreed with Mayor Nelson. MOTION: By Councilman Molina, seconded by Councilwoman Norris to return this item to the Planning Commission for a recommendation at the meeting on Tuesday, February 19th and return to the Council meeting on Monday, February 25, 1985. Passed unanimously. 3. General Plan Amendment 1A-85, 8942 Palomar Road (Lot 160 Block MC) John and Becky Bunyea (Amending the Land Use Element Map Designation from Moderate Density Single Family Residential to High Density Single Family Residential) Staff report was given by Henry Engen, Planning Director. There was no public comment. MOTION: By Councilwoman Norris, seconded by Coucilwoman Mackey for approval of Resolution 9-85. Passed unanimously by roll call vote. 4. General Plan Amendment 1B-95, 1875 El Camino Real (Lot 31, Block 49) H.L.S. Properties Ltd./Associated Professions (Amending the Land Use Element Map Designation from Suburban Single Family Residential to Retail Commerical (Neighborhood Commercial) Staff report was given by Henry Engen, Planning Director. Toby Osgood of Associated Professions spoke on behalf of her client Bart Hackely of H.L.S. Properties. She stated that Mr. Hackley would like to have back what he had when he bought the property. He was never notified that the property had been down zoned. Judy Hutton, Realtor, said she sold Mr. Hackley the property and she had never been notified that the property had been down zoned. She felt that Mr. Hackley should have received a letter or some type of notice regarding this . Mr. Grimes, City Attorney, stated that all notices had been published in the newspaper meeting all requirements of notifications. MOTION: _ By Councilwoman Mackey, seconded by Councilman Molina to approve Resolution No. 10-85 denying the requested plan change. Motion died 2 : 3 by roll call vote. MOTION: By Councilman Handshy, seconded by Councilwoman Norris that staff prepare a new resolution expressing the council ' s concerns and to approve this general plan amendment. Passed 3 : 2 by roll call vote with Councilwoman Mackey and Councilman Molina voting no. -3- 12, MINUTES - ATASCADERO CI'OCOUNCIL Regular Meeting February 12 1985 Atascadero Administration Building Page 4 5 . Public Hearing of Proposed Building and Construction Fee Schedule Staff report was given by Henry Engen, Planning Director. Elliott Stephenson testified that the simplified fee schedule was a good idea but he was concerned over the self-certification option for structural plan check. After discussion the Council consensus was that this could be brought back by staff for reconsideration if there are any problems. 6 . Police Facility Committee Final Report Staff report was given by Bud McHale, Police Chief. He reported that the Police Facility Committee met Thursday, January 31st for the purpose of reviewing current alternatives under con- sideration. The Masonic Building was considered but the consensus, of the committee was not in favor of this alternative. The commit= tee' s unanimous recommendation is: l) purchase or lease a temporary modular building of sufficient size and design to accommodate pre-, sent and near future police operations and locate same on existing City owned land. 2) Establish a designated police facility fund to which an established amount ($80, 000 per year) would be added at the beginning of each fiscal year. Enact an ordinance that would pre- clude the use of any part of the fund for anything but its speci- fically designated intent except by a Council ' s 4/5 vote in case of an actual emergency. The basic cost would be $190, 000 plus site preparation. Mayor Nelson thanked Chief McHale and the Committee for their fine work and asked that thank you letters be sent to each of the com- mittee members. He also asked the Chief for a written report for the next Council Agenda. 7. Review of the Masonic Building StructuralEvaluation Proposal and Costs Thereof John Wallace, Contract Engineer, reported that he and Bud McHale had walked through the facility and came to the conclusion that the building would need to be upgraded to be used by the City but the question was what would be needed to be done to it to make it more structurally sound. In January he had a structural engineer and a materials testing engineer walk through again with him to evaluate it visually and also to provide council with a written proposal as to the cost for further evaluation. The evaluation would be focused on what basic structural requirements would be necessary, how sound the building is and to take materials tests both core samples and non-destructive types of tests where they actually sense how much steel is in the wall. To give Council a report on their conclusions and some general recommendations what would .need to be done to bring the facility up to an acceptable structural level, they proposed that it would cost from $5, 500 to $7, 000 . -4 MINUTES - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting February 12, 1985 Atascadero Administration Building Page 5 Councilman Handsh 0 y said he felt. this was a vx.able option for a facility but he did not want to spend this kindofmoney to find out that the building will stand for another 70 years Mr. Wallace said he would not recommend going ahead blindly to install our facilities in the Masonic Building due to flood and earthquake situations without some investigation. Councilman Molina said he feels for historical values the Masonic Building goes along with the Administration Building. The question is will the Police Department work more efficiently in that facility. We gave up the question of safety 6 years ago when we took the res- ponsibility of using the Administration Building as our meeting place and office space. Mr. Elliott Stephenson reported that the photographs that are available in the museum do not show any re-enforcement steel between the walls, and no ties between the concrete slabs and the masonary walls and what the roof construction was and how it is tied together. Today he reviewed the plans for the building. There is not one iota of re-enforcing steel in any brick wall in that building. According to the plans there are no ties between the concrete slabs and the masonary walls. There are no ties between the steel trusses and the masonary walls except for two bolts at each truss and they are far apart. There is no connection between the roof system rafters and the walls. In his opinion this would be one of the*st places in town you could locate a Police Department. Mayor Nelson said that with the report from Bud McHale and the com- mittee, _the Council can study it and make a decision as soon as possible, hopefully in two weeks. C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Evaluation of Hazardous Conditions at 4511-19 Mananita Staff report was given by Henry Engen, Planning Director. Councilwoman Norris asked to be excused due to conflict of interest. MOTION: By Councilwoman Mackey, seconded by Councilman Handshy to terminate consideration of Resolution 4-85 but to direct the Planning Depart- ment to withhold release of the pending building permits until the drainage facility has received final approval i.e. covering and clean up of the offsite pipe and installation of rip rap. Passed by 4 : 0 roll call vote, with Councilwoman Norris excused -5- MINUTES - ATASCADERO CI9WOUNCIL Regular Meeting February 12, 1985 Atascadero Administration Building Page 6 2. Fund Transfer Request - Expenses Related to City Manager Recruitment Report was given by Ralph Dowell, Acting City Manager. MOTION: By Councilman Molina, seconded by Councilman Handshy to transfer the funds. Passed unanimously by roll call vote. Mayor Nelson stated that these funds are to be used for lodging only, but if there are any protests to this, to consult with Councilman Handshy or Mayor Nelson. D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Citizens Transportation Advisory Committee Appointment Ralph Dowell, Acting City Manager, stated that he had not received, any names or volunteers. MOTION: By Councilman Molina, seconded by Councilwoman Mackey to appoint Bill Silver to this committee. Passed unanimously. E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION 1. City Council Councilman Handshy reported orted on the meeting that was held on Friday, February 8 regarding the Dial-A-Ride public hearing. He said that he and Councilwoman Norris felt that an advertisement should be put in the newspaper as soon as possible regarding the use of the Dial- A-Ride system and how to get the best service out of it. They felt that if the Senior Citizens and the general public made more use of the service between 9 and 3 daily, and left the other hours for school children and the handicapped, everyone would benefit more from the Dial-A-Ride Service. They also recommended that the addi- tional money not be transferred at this time for this service. Mike Moore and Don Lieb are in the process of preparing the advertisement for the newspaper at this time. Ralph Dowell, Acting City Manager, will bring back at the next council meeting a recommendation to the Council regarding payment of this advertisement. MOTION: By Councilman Molina, seconded by Councilwoman Norris to go along with Councilman Handshy' s and Councilwoman Norris ' recommendations. Passed unanimously. 2. City Attorney None 3. City Clerk None 4. City Treasurer None -6- MINUTES - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting February 12, 1985 Atascadero Administration Building Page 7 5 . City Manager Acting City Manager, Ralph Dowell, reported that he has some figures back from the low bidder on the building renovation. They are in the process of evaluating the entire bid and will bring this back to the Council on February 25. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 9:55 P.M. TO A CLOSED SESSION. CLOSED SESSION ADJOURNED AT 11: 07 P.M. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 11: 08 P.M. TO A SPECIAL MEETING ON SATURDAY, FEBURARY 23 1985 at 8 : 30 A.M. IN ROOM 207 OF THE ADMINISTRATION BUILDING FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONDUCTING INTERVIEWS FOR THE CITY MANAGER POSITION. RECORDED BY: GRZGGER J ES, City lerk C JNCIL MEETING : 2/25/85 r.NDA ITEM NO. : A 2 CITY OF ATASCADERO TREASURER'S REPORT • JANUARY 1, 1985 TO JANUARY 31, 1985 RECEIPTS TAXES Property Tax 73,226.64 Cigarette Tax 4,017.32 Motor Vehicle "In Lieu" 45,500.78 Sales & Use 81,072.66 Occupancy Tax 3,360.72 LICENSES/PERMITS/FEES 45,016.01 GAS TAX -0- TRAFFIC SAFETY 2,560. 26 REVENUE SHARING 43,501.00 RECREATION FEES 15,684.00 RETURNED FROM LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND AND MATURED TIME DEPOSITS 1,150,000. 00 • INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS 20,032.52 TRANSPORTATION SB-325 182,154.50 MISCELLANEOUS Rents/Concessions 434. 43 Sale Maps/Publications/Reports 538.85 Special Police Services 123.00 Fines & Penalties 732. 57 Dial-A-Ride Farebox 2,179.05 Reimbursement to Expense 980.94 Refunds 1, 293.19 Planning Permit Deposits 7,594.22 Bails/Bonds 694. 00 P.O.S.T. 3,060.20 Rebates 44.10 Weed Abatement 2,152. 89 Reimbursement from Sanitation District 70,892.86 Off-Highway Vehicles 141. 56 Narcotic' s Officer 360. 00 Miscellaneous 317.63 TOTAL $1,757,665.90 1 CITY OF ATASCADERO TREASURER'S REPORT JANUARY 1, 1985 TO JANUARY 31, 1985 INVESTMENTS LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND 1,220 ,000.00 TIME DEPOSIT, SANTA BARBARA SAVINGS 10. 50% INTEREST, MATURES 06/10/85 100,000.00 TOTAL INVESTMENT DEPOSITS $1,320,000.00 Ralph H. Dowell, Jr. City Treasurer 2 ONCIL MFFTING : 2/25/85 AGFNPA ITEM NO. : A 3 CITY OF ATASCADERO FINANCE DIRECTOR'S REPORT JANUARY 1, 1985 TO JANUARY 31, 1985 BALANCE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1985 68,121. 30 DEPOSITED BY TREASURER, SEE RECEIPTS, TREASURER'S REPORT, PAGE 1 1,757,665.90 TOTAL 1,825,787.20 HAND CHECK REGISTER DATED 01/31/85 1,125,335.47 CHECK REGISTER DATED 01/10/85 81,973.79 CHECK REGISTER DATED 01/11/85 1,379.25 CHECK REGISTER DATED 01/18/85 45,050.49 CHECK REGISTER DATED 01/23/85 1,329. 25 CHECK REGISTER DATED 01/31/85 391,226.70 EXPENSE LISTING 112,843.54 TOTAL 1,759,138.49 BALANCE AS OF JANUARY 31, 1985 66,648.71 • PETTY CASH 200.00 TREASURY INVESTMENTS SEE TREASURER'S REPORT, PAGE 2 1,320 ,000.00 TOTAL 1,386,848.71 I, RALPH H. DOWELL, JR. , do hereby certify and declare that demands enumerated and referred to in the foregoing register are accurate and just claims against the City and that there are funds available for payment thereof in the City Treasury. Dated: February 19, 1985 Ralph H. Dowell, Jr. Finance Director 3 • CD n o t ,J t _. �r^ � \\r'•' :�w _ � J C7 `C!� ..r+ 1 TtJ L\G .'�',: \ ;.^. G �� .. .. .,, f.� 04 i j is i a i { i ! E � I � G O..•, G O �G �-t7 O .... C I XXY. Y tCX X ZZ LZ la a t U _ .•,s` �._ _ ti;. - _..,. _ _ __ __ ter. _ � Q`Y•y G C* K �f 4' Vv: fJ f. J ;J rJ C_IId N N N . Cj:! CQ '.J cz eJ CD Cj Nn Y• its a':J _ Lcz Ci ,.,, � - t� r. r- � s\ .r.e.� -.� .r.a e-a '•."t\ r,,-<-*a•. -+...,r. T.. -..v...e Li ctj Q • \ \ \tet \ r^ \\\\ \ \ \ \\\ \\ \ \_ \' \ \ \ Vt \\CQ �\� \ r r o cu o , z. rc X Li 0 LI Ut Li fn L 4 Q <- L -Z — � I • I I � i � I i` � i ' 3 ; i E.- `= C�ti�= .tom r: 3 �.3�-•`.C7 :�f��. .k_. T R=.. _ I I Ico.,✓I Rac C3. I e C7 c., ^.J C' C C4 C v L L J_'.�^ C3 C] L G` a:�O C fj X X X X XXX'^t X..t X.X X X X X Y X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X C"3 Va C •t'_`- i vai .J^J iJ .-C-Q •.! ^! :Q i ,:N CJ -s J J r: Cs ..E S j i7j J C'S .!cli } Yt ca co zo LL - s"° U ? ^'"J ...•C C.O Com• V '^..0 R Oa a CC =-'R '. I - Lt. La a .. Ll LJ Z Z Z z z • z ,; z z Z t 17 UJ jCr Cti C.; C: C.i C: t '' ^_ J .T f.i j CJ I r III cc ' I I � a cu t. :j o ; s a _ LJ 1 \ 1 cz \ \ - 'r0 U j u 3..L 4 I Z J } r - -_ i o ., 10 'n'T� c-o ac oa ico oc � ncaCJ'CJ o�tT!^Y7 ao 3(Maa'000coaG' I° aC1:"ry o;o .o:o aloo .r h�U� fJ�M[`SMC'3. ooQloaaooU7ttZU?.oM of w zI! M U; 010 co ,30.E co in jr) N C-1 U?...a. {;3cL+C3 IQ� C�J' U"!L�oct�: r�.� ��. j L9 ! 3 ^ C U' 47 7 o c a o o \t` a C1,.,Q' 0 CJ .1 �::n J ^;l\.J Cl•:J Q ,.*:., ,.,! CL C1,N� U'f.4a ,-.iv H M M 10 ?1 OD Q t M M I �i;N CJ ! - i N � I O { t E ' z ! o i Qi i U W W !1''t CG i 7- LI l z,_� z :W 4st, I Q i CJ CJ L31�J' U. �Q r_ ¢-_-j U i�Q >-'a U �9�k w L.-t- r!--- =t \ i M Q z .!o iz I<L H\ t... ,r�k--E... r-i¢¢ ¢4 Q J I r+ C i tt Oj .iL Ira iL J C.i V, 1-4 U, Q Q�Q ¢!3 3 33M E-i .•+ ' 0 H L'O. z 3 3 3 3 3! - ! o }•_ I !Ljt IIi ii-_! -! L!J-jz t- S z 15�# .:1�� t ) a �� CJ zl z:z 13 s :4y L u'H t:_G�u Q�f- I J C.,3 C P C! LJ 4.! 1G'i 1: �<c o ^.,a c '.CJ r Qci GB -I t-s t CJ tz C CJ G*.CJ M G+. 13 1?{a M x7 U: r.l_ .n ;.;�4?t\\w C{ U7 c3 v C`T il C'd ..: 7 i ! �� Q'Q !a... jC1 M w M'.M i`"3 MMC C C vJ M M!"� z� c z zl sJ�.J 'LJ ICJ {^^ ,-. {..' .+ n�,. iU7 ;�!fl3..3 ll C .y+. Q: H H C1i >-!>. !o 'U7 N'f1 C Ca CJ CJICy CJ c--,j CJ ;...j W CJ�0'CJ T+ o *»1^*-� CJ I { I aof c of aa 'a is is^a�aaaooalc oaa-�ao�oaalaaa� G: o � c c; ojo .a .a o o ai a a-.o c coo ?c c ala c c ^a c3 aI I + o c' !a c o ooaacc ,.. alc aaa�cccaaaa c t ;p ! !: .� ' X ` X tl xl>c X !x xxxxxxXxx!ic Jxxx�xxx'Xxx;xxX x Z CGI L� Ls! L ';u LtJ LtJ 1 'U u u LJ t Ld W'W Lc _ ;'J W U u LJ L,}w J t I I ie} ,a O =1= Cl,I c:.^ o cocacc-cc!o alacc'aa aaa cl ¢a aci of a o o is ac oc as ra oc coca coni o U'' t� i o d o1 a c c a E�f a o 0 0 0 ✓o 0 0 o a :In \! U. ,J N. Civ 47 U' If)x)a; -:u')u) U 0 J.CJ J v1 r•t r J.CJ C1 CJ:, C Q ^ �; ! CJ tt C1; N ,-.,.., ,K ra.� r, -,,-. tM r7, M P)"'I M M M !I G� CJ -� r1! N. 1;CJ -CJ CJ -.C•J CJ r�'CJ CJ CJ � J CJ!CJ !M fJ fJ!CJ rt CJ-CJ J ne:CJ J CJ' CJ U "� Q i Si tl _ iI a! ! ii € t e.. i t{ a o a a a a o c o oi^a o'o c clo a aia o'c o �j try I J�I E LI o r� o� of c(a is ,a c a:.a :a a a�a !a a afa o a!o aia Q;•-R, ! a t I L1 z i a a M! I h7;U� !<. �'t f j t i I! ! ,,,, t I' :t 17 U7 U7 ?U? U7:+t U7 U3 r+ -.+CCM M.: n,'�era d> ?� O ~'a Ci C, !C IM. ,C1 CJ -3 CJ CJS J CJIC C C C C C.erl4 CiC er• Mi a i¢LJ¢ u i + 4) i Ir. 13 Ik - { Ii ..l. - i :! L a o c:c i s !a j a o a c o o w a -c •j a a.a a =J= c ai c Q cq o! a o a as oaa-coa aaaaaa'aac'^oo a I i,i_J-�• +" .'.{ .-.1 .+ ;.-s i t� r++'^a-�r+ .-,r'r+ ^^ ra.-. .-.e.,-. 1"`^ .++-,.,+ e-•I I vet U � c Q� cl ola is �c - �o a a•c c oio o a a -..c c a--a a!a a a!a a c: o 411 U " [�p.. M''''c_ •• t- ?r3l r �- ?F- ;CJ W) M C V,J ca-'n a .+CJ C W3 C a is I ! r .-, ,. i p ^".:`. G' "-�'•. :� C >- Z a 33 L3 S O Cka C�C a a a It? .i•- Ly Lv�-1 '.,{n' p, *". .. 1' G j O .a a�! _,e+a+ .+ ! :. T+ ..I x o 4.� � q`-J oL• cU a -� !aJ 'o*� at3 cco�oep 'co iaaa'L.3 o I... Lj 1 W I E3 tr j o:LJ LT ''J V .t3 3 .IL J _e C=a-C- - `IL3 _ I r� t S U r z ¢ �zQ 3 i Q I� '� i 3 G) ! �:.: G^. is L z Z SI J rr d { ,� ¢I I� : c o t- Q I>= t- u J E� I a a `a I J G7 L•7 �¢ Q Q { +z 1F yQ t Q y �¢ I¢ ¢ ¢ Q 3 f CJ C C-1 �.CJ r, J h C o J r{ L ,0 0 !` U � I 3 W a 571 �c � - -.1 .� w " I V r-j - ; C C C I C1 C1 i CJ CJ CJ' nia n m m12 = 2 c cv �r �r _ �� ter �s sir � �� � � t� �.�► �:� �� t3! G !� o �QCO.0caC cc ob oo ca ca u767 cocco oC i `� PGm .a67`roq o0 0o ac PP ac .+;� oor-+o6Z[�Ma17 c . bo p'J� ' z E: PJ U-)U-) o oCa�o G P cO 0o V b-7 in 674'7 67c6? oPJ G^i'?li7 e, CD i0.; dh h L7 i G t t .•. .-+ u7 o w P O. 10'?h N r„'`i h+:P 7.ia v+ C Cy`0 ¢i4 { M G o ! k .6 z c o ! r•s ; L) 3 QLD L;1 G �¢ a c as n z z U) z F"o-z Ld UGN z _j , 3li L3J�° -Fi U LU Z 1 C?03c^..• M C C3.) ;r; .O I Z C' P I C-d CJ !r 1t7 C J F`7 Im „a,t •' ' ! Z _J CJI ¢ w ^ ^J C' .' J CJ Cd ^J to m f- ¢ L' i_ 3��+%->•-t h . I 1 X17 1 .• h ?in L7 7.u?to yr2 I c c�c c o l..-.a o) a a 1 c I a a b o I•^ Z CDo�oc^�a c o! o at a' c c occocccc b �� _ I c a! o a a a ooaac oc � p a �: i IfX KXX X'.XXX X X� X' X: X X! X.XX X7CXXXX bC DCX J ' W J Lt J I LJ Ll W,I. i3 i L.3 ,_t _t_dJ Lj�41 W -'W J R L { O eater as a C occc !` i ¢ I o c .-.cco of al ,•.! o a o ac^ c o o c :af L.1 I- oa .., c o I of al cl a ac00000c to ac H ,�` I`h { c�. OI a ^i cl G C* G k PLS {a Ica �� _ ¢ ..; L,O V Q'.IT c `a' CJ V V Mi PJ C r J r,' :o !1 of C C.1 i rs 3 r.J C^..! 1{ :J PJ PJ` rJ !`i M N'. M M I-? t ICJ J J C•J o ! a oo c c{ a c a o00o c o ao r.. iV oa.a ,. a a of c c o occa. p.. c � ioo r ¢iJ >- c cc000 o a� of a a c� a oa o o Ia o I t"'r J F ri?0 o CJ�7 �. 'I •,+.I :-; i•? ,•+'.•+r: .... ,.., 1 �J q a {rl' s{I ? P Q cr 4 i C' `� ?'�Q C!�• u1 �i' �t Q a a3 VW ¢U2 il . 71 =� .:a j .••.;"ra T.ir. ^. e•. .-. �3 :-s e-t 11 e+++T" -..-.,-.^ .+ re•.*• f ` I aa'accaoa o o1 a o o ! a I cao a- oar .. u7 1 q rr,Prl a L-' .0 §7 C -.C coD 0 sJ- 'c a C iK?O ti p I L7 >- yl Z = L7 ryl Ct"n. ,,1 •iF- oi- CJis... C CI!- !- w !C C-13 L�I! a a ..I `.o. O� � .•+� O:� ^ a1- O cic of F of a ri oE.J o4 ca L) t Z ! ^ s L:7 LLI W T OG GIS s..S OX >"' "' O o U _{G :i sUl f J b F i u L! J ' t L7 i — N z Fq z ¢ F` U ¢ s, i z JLL z . ¢ C r w C a ¢ L71 r u a 13 ;~;� i r? G++� .-• ..• v !. c.'+ rpt .-, Z Cd a' c ,•+ PJ CJ N CJ c N CJ CJ� PJ C, C_ N - C, V. Ca I 1 ¢ U r L< 9 i --- - - -- — 0 Mh 'c o o a o c I r. t\,..,,.,,4Z O € 0- n M k^J € CJ .+I n 7 9i7 to.x P 1010 o ':47 4'3 Y7 a a i Q I�'J,.0.- '3- Q��\47 rJ I .+ .0 .7 .,•. . I nJ �t a ns p` L! Z i€ r. a .-+p 0 P7 L,7 47 Ip ,,. nJ N CJ rJ n LZ I o 47"'.M Q 7 h CJ 1,\ ('J 'C �+ i a o l n :L'+`rJ a i L9 ^!! rJ Cv ...- N. :=J tV J .. a F'J.. fiJ{ .•. •.. C.1 r, - i Q rJ �G' t'? O- N L� N ip Q1 I . € I ...+ j l TCD i ;�. i. . 01 i i t L3 9L L9L:j. .' ( Y O L•7 J X K :r7 LS A a !Lso0v00 J IQ.C=Zx¢ �Q G £fS � a��7 �zzZjZZ J !-}OOLoL) Q €-- J ^\,� c L r C:� to + *�1-f�+ .a I ��\oc iil F \ u 1 rK l +� + i:1 Ll Lal'J W w W L€ _ fl.1;;:L M9 0 s€\ _�\u S "- 1 .: I Z n_ 1 0.G.G._r. I 'ELS A IL7 RS}J J U Lj1 U A -iaadQ¢:dddid 0000 L914w 0{dc ¢It €- g a_, a JJ.¢Z >=c - i BAR AA t-fcC<F7J ., L7 IJ-tQ Z O o r.jJ Q 1 € o In 4s.1 L7 u u..47 f+, L0,01 a Q J .�:Com' ;=•31 J' .;, 7 CJ.M v O c N3 +�+'P7 t 3 min t^.M r.^ 1�a J a J T'CJ L�i� Q J^ ^J o a a ?^J 1 CJ r L L�..L- .C- 17 Q C,if-, ^.,Apr-+-.a'�r� ?`.i0 O 0 O fiJ C- v I� +71.w1t..A 7�7 1"7 10 -0 X47 47 4717. 7 47147 �L'J CJ Njvj CJ V' ;'v 7 7iol L'. :.IL ! a ooao o !aoa!ac coda caloa a a a a^ a!ao caaaacacica o o.� .., oo 'aao:oo ; co;ao x } clo o _c o cc. - c €- X X X X Y..X X X'X X XXX X - X XX X X-iX Y. XXX I X X X XXX X z t o iij U W LJ_i,w w U I W �:i.J �!U L '�! > Lei isi u...€L iU U x r Lji1 lel I L CD CL o U bi Nc _ o p a cic ( { a o a a a o r a o =!i-= a s la o c a o o l k \i C.' fiJ CJ J fj Ci CJ CJ C.i CJ!aJ ^J M -Lm r+ 1 fiJ CITU CJ rJ.a CJ tV'J CJ _i M CJ fiJ+I C•.! L1 e+ Q € J a a a� ^o olo ooc�- acao aooa , a to o as I _:.7J I L)::J R d� - o I oocaaaoalo ac oc ooiaco! aalaa c o o ooao s A z + € 1 !1 ! € i + i€ 4 aI ,-. { rJ:L7 ,c'r, a;V) "9 M'M M I t`1 aIn M t'l.,7 7 V M M < a ,-+ a M-.C7 th t ^ !- O A' 7 .. c�a�-.1Q, a A7 7 1"3 'IT 7 7i7 7 7 M?•7 7!'t 7 7 7 7 I -TM 7.q 4T:Q U U i ? QFs ! a o oa cac o a';ac i acl_ c a a a vI !I + + o a Lim. +�'+1.- <""e+.�'r+e•.h �e+.-.r.�...^ l ... i-+... �-.e•+ e-+I r•.—s .. e+ r+ 7 e+ +-.^ a G 1. I. l +. I!I J J } 1 Li, L ! C. ..i ifiJ I- i.-. r, ., Pi•Q I© i:- V' F- ofd�l N}Q- 4�C.1 € !,; Y ^I O - N7 O niJ 43 O ,-� 0 \ 0� a O (, Mj O >- oc z S �'-r- IJ E- -- .1 t- t- a 1-111111 ! G, [0 ! 47 47'. :;;,; n w�O a: W O rJ i.'. C2 l- it- c Y L? C), "..3 'o YI o arc o o Y a_+ Y a 1 €il O a =� o ci l a j _ c c +u d Ja u o I t-+ 0.z € W € 0�� iC3 i L''U `1 O.J IC3 a j ,SI G OiG rJ -r ... S ...:M 0 X : C.0 S IIIIII ^ .LSI - Ci`_ b U. `= U L L- C7. .. t J IJ ! IJ € r L7 :. r R z J i U J S ' u €- C U t- ^ 4 u7 - LA LS € 0 J Q L.€ 0 ` w Q c L3 L9 Ir D O LJ. I !- J LS 0. U z Q r i¢- u3 d ! o o v o IN fiJ w z a - L a: J r, co T .+ .. .J z r_ [`J. !CJ n C.' fv CJ rJ �N ^i o n o I n o m i o � � � •` �_ � � v. � m o - r.i -c n :D n 4 0: ': - rv;n v m o o. U � n 1 _ __ �I^ �!- ;1- .lam ", � ✓ t L7 0 r.^' o n aT P c •, n P a o o a o 1 c hZ Q P o 0 0 . CJ J a o .Q o th 4,o Ell--o t r•�.,0 v. P I o `rP Ccoo MM u7i oCQ in r, aC= nJ� t} y 0 aou7 wo a p � p t^ flSD W JP ' .0 v a Jr.v M"Ja [.,CJv to p CN �}f•' t'7 w .. n .3..C}C7 '^ i o c C3 ca Q '! CJ .-.... aw r.J ..�u7 f•J 67 M y7 F•J W aIi t c j i ! a ! t t ..i t� 7o ez, J r-t� ¢ L^� W Ural G7 A -LU ccao 6 Z 1t ts = ! I1 _t ''.2 S coI U. o •.,, a LJ c_tai\ Z I ¢3¢ r.- I Z L''1 G 1 L'7 Z X X r 3 i 3 I r Q -j F, Le) >>i+-U LU { L(ix 00 ¢. -.Lair t I ul... W7 _n ,�Z -.V- rUr= 'rU tEE ¢i N .. , v i ¢J¢ r I 1 ¢ it W U U P ! 4 P! ri w c,; i {, .- •.,,PJ P 4,i^': ^ { .:G u7 CJ^C+o a�7 CJ CJ GS i }- vi :. :. C�\ o a 0 Z, _ C. _"U N ! a PI -'• t F-t a: ¢ Z=+ CJ -:3 G CJ II a I - �I av� a ... alco a of aoa ac aaooaop bao! a '. :r-5i. c 1 c, o:v-a a 1 ca ao aoao aaco•= cacti o I ! I: i x � x I _ x ' Sc x x Xi xx x x I X X x X I X XXI Y.XX �c Y.XX DCX. . X SC _ 1 Z C,{: '..': iit 1 i:.t J W (.. .i 1 L-1 tJ{ tai !-tt!_F t.1 :�1 V f L.t Imo"{,iJ:yl �..t V !.:!ta]!:.�� La aol cl ^a a I ooaa,c .,o aQaac oi:? u�� a a� G' O a al O ¢ L � 'L:1 '' ;•; o of c o 0 o i a ! a s o'. o '�� coo a o a o o c .» o L^ cac o a o G`- 1 a o ^ '� I L*L'+ a c o a pp1 '+ u�C j.s P `r 1'1 is !6 C fl j r I a+ rs r+ e+:•�.-. 'r+ -.k-* T...•.yr e..^C�i k+ t`t, ;J 'J fJ C} s•J I M M J�3 N r}tJ t C3 PJ C'J J['J - }N`"J:'1 K'J i'J IV a ji -- al o c:ao E a I aal ^cc'^.,acoc� Cooccoa ca ._, I Ute:' a -I a ccc I a I ca' a^ca:c occ loa•^bafl;a caa� a i+ .a - A c c a c:a o f a a c n .� c o c o 0 Z AI Z ! V ! 1t ! ! j '.t i k,ld !e I �• ! 1t. t I Ii t t :}-r-U! fl G +,: c Js.A , P -• ••+ C 1:,-•. ,C ? M P: V3•-'f•".+^ R P d .+ - L.:; .�. O A c M .J JR2 P P P `J1 tP Pa IPaP �JPP]sf' I`�.P `x a i �A' L 1- a'�•'• R O Ca •^ %a O Ga a O Q sl O J{ O a O O a s a a 0 C O C b a O U t_t l� ;t- <t It- u7 t- JZ F-! .•+ t-- y'7 Cn t- 7 t- '"J F 't- fl 1 o. J fl r a o I i a fl a +? �! Z w ^ jj'i a''t- V t- J F- Q n. L E j !- P k o, sy , c+ I_ o� m -; - it ^� _ pa o .a.�` UI M ' i.L. CD LU I IU V ly r- u i�l G_ �..�. �L3 �}` (� 'G. L- [,� C.- -C-.. C. t 6 t. t 1+{ F - U j X c 2 fl .� GZ 3 ?- ¢ :^• Yom-, h L 6 ¢ 3 Q Lj Z t A A U Z 1 ^ J t :_I Y ,y _ ' i H 1-4 U. ^Y LL Q 3 J ..! H X T V u Li t'. A W .4 Li L CJ .-- C2 Ar 10 Z T.J `; a o o o c o o a .•. i rJPI \ :.J { -J N V {'J i°J N. N CJ CJ PJ (¢ G Z" ► _o _fir +� � +ai 11r W tJ u % _ w a ® �? I p 000t"I a .ram o� �t31.0 I s 0?co;,+'+CJ I-.c P�. r,M 4+ a'a a� Q iQ h i- 0�? 47 p3 A� c o C o 4:.43. o -W z 47 M�Q P Id P i ,0 Q jr.. 0X43 =6 a)co C� CJ vJ c� M M n� 4?N Qr r o o .3. G7 0o+ :a v .-'M L^Oi ?4 h,.,M Y3 y'l C..a. 'r j... 4?p7 M c C 43 tis ®c -P{ t ¢ j W M h1�I M ^N .•. .? N a3:.i+ M .+ PJ Q I aJ t1i I � . i ;o U z f s 111 nc Q Q t-t Q Of C : t-t F M 1 •'J W W L1 z M £ w Li �. of i 1---!t:-i u t.1. \0 '.' UJr= \ t--[ L'7 0 z z 1 Qi a j H= z z P O X O 0 re u W U- i- i LD!E: j= > I --q L' F iii ¢ F 0 X i Q H z k u:u c c { ¢¢. J1 2 F,1 1 , p z z 4m ¢ O f •`*. .E :.+ �. 'W F F �..U - f .+P �.I £ Q c u G z i-s <t' O i P z E W O LfM^? rr. ¢ if: G ; { :3 �. .-t A U.L) I A 0':j3 o.ao c3 1 , { IX X I X, XI X' xI XI Xi X X xl X X XI XI X i z r U W Iii tJ I ,.zt L:EI Wi WI Wi W w i..= 13 U .�j LiIf Ul 1 !-r 1 CC1j } . .y iJ n+ ¢ I oan jao ac n. c1 fWco L 1 o aio a o of cj o� offf o c� M �� M M�� aI c� D R \i i a.r lac 47 1.3 \ 4T Q c i sf' C' 47 c i Q 1 j NN ICs J { .. .-:, �{ M CJi .•J rt �J TJ! a �i :J `o itI .J Ct CJ ` J cu i QJ^SI x+l f l I r .J n n t'.'S J.. tV M J N Jj N J.' S U=>I.t ca. .ro a. a� c c o. a a! o- •ai c o. c -I W 1. p;.i av,o o .. • n.0 Z I i. F Ll tLLJII a?47 47 CJ .+•-+ M Q vi 1'i f'JI -T IT M iii M M� CS C I R e j¢61 a c: U,,..j i s ^I c a i of cl o a ^t of c I is71 GC 101 c a a of ajin } _ U ' 1 i¢. �Q. 2 _....Iti 6 :Q ' U i 43 'r y %0.F ,•'F 7 F a F t?J F E\F `°F Y?:F ?IF Q'F �tIF DJ'F 4 O n. \$O .0.O s?0 00 r+0 40 00 t10 20 '0 NIC) h1:0 0- 7.�- Z W ! t- <Y F C"F v k- t• F L F o�•- �y I F C;F et lF 4 F cti s.i G4 v P. I i\I r•+f PI co c.,�1.. PI V1� L*I! P'. oi� oY a= a I W a a { ZJ a LI a aiw o U c`? a i3 a i a U a o oIL C o U oj:; c { •o-"• f.` E r 1 :.i W. .Lt 'i•S I: . IiL f t1:' �l i ct i .i i .: t W O 2 j � -_OIS •T O,T 03.T- M. U ? y U G L°.d£.I C-UI r U., r:.i(, �"U r.0 IL U Cr.0 c'"U 6•U L'U. r"�U y F f 1 1 f i I Q Lu t 1 Z Wi J z L 7 O '� cs O S: :.1 M ¢ ¢' - ¢ cc: z Z � O E r O O L Q _r z C O F. J L•? L F S Q GL £ Q4 L z 4 ?- F ¢ W i U G? U iY = u 0 ,z .L1 0 Z $? Li. Y ! fel. n? ":j hid ^ ;.J jr N v V, It M M Mf`Yi M Mj i`1 13 = O N N oJ{ C." C'C" C l N CS ttil CJ C PJ CS cJ r O - C U n ,� .p j c: O ✓f :D d 0: O - N 0 n O O n .p M 1 C Y: :p(1 � P _ - - •. n( - '.u�_ y . 1 I r1 n I„1 '1 I t'1 '1 O C V ^ C '^ . N!.. : N +� � � • �� � • ' •^ •T'• w w a o it � •� i • • '�'` alt. @ @ _ @ q� @ @ �► � cu C! 4J @;3_ � � @_---� _C� _fy � � I F : P !nL? oa oca t`_M M� 67oN.t�.00nr^ 5•.4?CJ i-ro ^L'.,r (Nv' '3'p vQa�i�': oa �. L1 I aNL? ac Ctt7i? b-)un C:--T r, oNM 'M N. cl, bat -0 V? PJ0J.'! C- ClCj Ar i I Q�` L• j.•v L? ! b i z I! F I � 1 U ! ED t r n l 23, F R LiW JLa_: uILW 12 .J Ir oo ccae�:o c� � : Y C..J 1 G7 L _1I _ rGC. Q w :,1LtW f~WJ J '.1' � -Cc E3 ;.=+ UQ u c I t! zzzzzzzzz c uc l L"Wu�-co 0 � ;c:F i U'i 'r3 " AA LjLUwwi WuwLjJ U;L" H.= }"L.: 17- C, u I L7 I f3 b t,U C-H fJ PJ E'1 L' ->I; �? �? L 5 1..1 a " OCD u.'a .4 C) �Q �L yZ, ��� � CQ f"` Z 1! n c --;^ P, C.0 - C-_.U. _ J i-� C rf D"".+ ❑ IM w w D J '•i CJ :.I [C s:a 7 u?It? �ta c� � cna�c Sao c� Dana �onocaco � C GI; oc on a a dccnccd c- Dao oa vocaa � c i od; a, a,.. o voCvcocc a � o:a a ooaac ... t I ccj c co c �oaoc cool ^a vc�p c � .-:novo i o i fiit !- 1! x %c' Xx DC x XxXxxisis xx btxxsc IXxxxxisXx I i:!I :.::,_! W W LJ LJ L1 W J!_! u 1W Eu.:3 L=1 i.1 u ° LJ '-s.1 f_'u CG - I a U a a c:n c ^aoac -:c r n� coo^ ao a aoo o_ Qv-Ii Doi a c.o o ocoaa ac ca o. c c .y cac IW a�1 t, ? u.j c ac v ocaiceo aa� c+a lac=a ;c o0 od I a s aaOil? i y 4 4 'J C 4 [24 a N rJ CJ;J J o I J!a+. �.+ fJ b•. r c.... a s f.! jj rJ C 1 .J .. PJ j.•.,..*"1,-. I.+4 7+".7 4_?il PJ fu .+ N 1J vj fJ 3 N LTJ J CJ N l N !J i4 M M 1M C'J N j j d PJ fJ CJ r-J ¢ it 'Qr � F ! co a o10 0 'aoao oac co acvo. �aacadao 1 c ;i•. U. 6E I o c a ,:M fQ3?a ^.a r_� �r? i U .- p A I 4 4 o Q i4 PJ • - CJ CJ' :4 M M 4C v 4 .J i.? e; , in, U 0 Cl G � A o ...1 0:.... � c o j ¢ I` = o o ^!c o oa cco� ca aonlc oc c j � i! ; li ; !i i i! >,.V I D i s? u? .+ ,., I-. ..s^ r+ -.e+T'�i+. .s 1� ..ie. .-•V'.4 eC .+ •e Is.r. .s+ ;� tui oof o ac ks occc` ^on oja �onoi o ^_ coo C n f U. t..! ;F " :F Qi r IrJ F r+ rJ„�.. �1h F I`' 4 til..''.F T" N F.. ;.r I - :.J (,+. i� O .�=� G ❑° D O (Y o. z F c'L•- � F U. LU }.- ;,.., .» .+� i F r G^ ca Ir , m of y1 v '!❑ i u, I W 3 ' .0 a 0 � U a I a �:.i a U d la -. c Ul V F. QC iL) t L u — u — a' :amu a I—v L. i f t p. y i j z i i LC O D . �Ly F G? J F U F- H J Q J z :.i z J z Iz Q Z I zCL i �- cl AI L Q Z t' J Z A U3 1 WI k Q 0 U ri 6-+143 -j ❑ E CX L Ga ± a c iv i`s v, v Ids' PJ 14= a PJ �PJ PJ �C`J PJ P1 I IA I :_-�/ Na o I a!( M M CJ ! i o01 oc�ocl oc R1��CJ M.p, 47�o.C� M G O�+ a� vLQ'.o c a)-D r`,yr0IT wM.TM 'Lt i Z�I aoi oc! c c^I NCJ'L- 47 '0 .0 a'. IV') L,)j,-) oaClCID o.bC* .:?corTpl .t9 j -,i i c o [•7 M CS N; Q' V ^J h iCJ CJ `t3 .V r:J— �I MMv CSLJ c tet: w cJ vi <r. i Ira ;..'� .�M � f Lo'). _ C.i';¢ .+ Lj MiCJ.. _ Q U �,.-S J J. , Jai J -i "-T X 0 C- +-I�4 Ir�� P,Ica �--0 0 i z z L -+ N� M'� oo L: AA i¢AA� A ri ¢ L ¢ J ca T �r'c CJ z L+ r-t Q' 47 IN q 't.'!- l r N Ej-;�•' 47 .'v10 j { => : u c+ c , CJ r-C--L Q Cl - Q GZ. ca C3 1` 1 , a i a l a I o aeric iaa��a ac o a a ca''=oalca ca i L o ; c I a� a c c c oa as o c c c a (c o ao X XIX X ::. X x XIX Y Xlit x X.X X x ? LjI LS W I '.:a Is i1U U eri LS 1 LJ J 1 CC Li :al L J L J IU W L.1 W + . I �•-C..� ? c , o I a r+ ..,o�a ;a... 'a a :i a c o c c a c:a a c a o i .Lu IVY a o c la a a Ia C a E.'S w- i v i N I a I r�.3:ca 14 C., C1 . S I ; C. CJ n -� e+ L'S PS �. VJ .-. J. M rTS�,f-J i:+ S -i'.i J CJ ++ N CJ. M +:•Lc{ rL OJ •! +i J N'•fS I I i l L7 rL I Jam. . o c i c � c c c Loc cc a a c c =0 ;Oo ca ;.J �¢ a a o o to io oc o a c c o a a3-a o�c c:a a c F ;J LIII d'47 IT v"v tT a' L yze a a la o'er o a C��o o a a oa a s ¢L ' c a : j a o a c a a s a a a a c a a a •--a —— U L�{� o I o I a i o oaa as a ao a a o o c rcoo �occ i ` L.J 4T MO O nO 00 -SMI .0 G+t• o f .;F }- a a.a!- c a F F w -31 1 I o uJ co I L. c ! co r+T LLt01 cLi o,a a,� c;.3LL Lj 1 C3 �v L r_r� to - u �c u se :u ° u L�+ -U -e f i ? z z L C.7 - L3 i J ¢ ;J z J � ; J z z Z W r.3 1 T 3 M W u F ¢ s-+ rA Lit W. Z i J J w m LO Ll L7 3-3 J. u Z W + L ¢ a u S F . i rn — i N 4-2 r NIN IT c- I\ N r7 ^ n Z II c *• a CJ a o o CJ a CSdi o ^ —� ! e+ r•J $ ice: i ti � _-� aK '= -- N CJ CS CJ I i Ct CS CS CJ N, CJ lz_z, �- ^ Ci_C - _ 4 •� I __ i": 'H n ^, n n C C. R r __ 9 J J J',U �. -._- • I` M .4 .0 P!L7"t .-• N N ! c a I c Q VZ� N O u1 M o- c o A ft7 b o [� o o` F-'� m Q' .-. .� N N`". 4-) to 0 c O ;. r C-P!.;. cs M P! N r-T ^iE7 t. ca y�II`.a Gi M M ?''}:^ O O 11 I Z !! [J V .. ,-.i ^'C ;�V7 '>:,.'' Q i [�r$7;,: ..sr n Cs`G-tp c 4 to J J' V7 its ;9 ',! a7 v Q •r C:,.N\ G^ �� N P! 7 .r.: ^i* - til!?J O M V7?t^ N C! C!N L• i Q i� w I I � � I � �' �^ I I tN M ! F i z! 0 !:J I 0 ! is r+ W. Lill w3 r a filii XJ LD LIQ OU . G S ! Q fi ct Z Q z I iE i- L ^ C LD O ZE -J d 3 'a= H t-t [! i r_z U- `�:E •..� LD:.1 Z" L L:i ,>_ r r':+ 1 3 I I. N o - N N r r t N N C C !. z : ,• ^! -!c- ! — ,r I _ u - w ca ^ tw z-�'ti i"'i ± ^ I •• N ui kJ � � I >- "'. M,� M(`�M P���n;M�7 �.z^A �-i E! }.•. I I I I t o a l v c'c c c t c c a c a o� a c c c is x i x xxx xx I x xxxxx�cxxxx L1x xxxrc x Sc �x Z W Lsl LJ LJ14 L t.,.j. u w W w u w Wu J '>J R:: 1 3 i- I- li Pic � :c -r - LD;: a i o 0 o C'j ^J ccco a ac o cc c a c D io - I' c c o,c ca o c ^ cpao�o cu�c c b a - IA \! 0 C!. M f CJ j p P!- C! f! ! N N g,i PJ J N N r! ! 1 J R!P., :! '! - !C! Iry Q ulit I lU': L ^ I r7 f:M IM 0 ""�.,'!'`Y M - E', = ! i ""A C ti'Q ;,+. I �'6 C'tt Q K." )<7'.QT P! 'Qu ¢' i'i vI— j ¢F5 ' c I c o a c ! c o o -1 UI 11: d:CJ J ` %1 n O er? jlC\!FO I;-_i FhO Iia!.rO C �X v h wz il n 1:JrO J x F ±-+ fl 77 u v r, c U' i3.C: ;_,cL- b U >Z U L• Q U U U Z.U _U .: s F n r. C2n it Q 0 IA O a.. z U? !S! m 0I 6. U o J z z z �z t :!.! ! I.i lig.' U) 0, z ! u F o o 10 Cil z -i J , ,. 's3.l zi F O z L. _ r. rJ Q ¢ Q D t cc l iC2 in N P z L11 M 91 PJ C! C! P! ,,^J I l�. +� a+ � � �a _ �_ _ws' � _-°�--� �► �' ��► —fin n�� � � ` ,� r,� I � �# O Q v Q vw w s a r► -S I- - -- —� KV' C,01 IM ca (a V) 611 cc 1 = 03-003, j y ! c o' coI oc aal N N1 •C'I IT -T oo aa? ocj Doti r oo y-)VM I\cJ? .tl. ,U ! �� -� cj i ¢ D O O -:w M M .40 o I Z �o D ' M j Or I II _ U) F I w 4J z 'sf u A -!L! L .:i!U w F ¢ w ii£.^, 47 z j ¢ 'S r is t"L U D cI LI. !-+ r-! .r_ ;CI .� S. I J I i.J D \ �I�F A U Lj L'. z j� CL. A 1 z IV a -' C7 rl L�u7 ,1u3 L.3 rte-{t I:iIA W CJ A .-+ U : N z't ¢ v .-+ t3 U -� �l ^ r" i\t� D o o e>• y7 zj M ri :?o a c -` U :.. K ,'>!1 SS s i1 D ;� ,CJ LO Y7 L Q 4w .. .+� h. V)u, -,1,) I: a o I a a a a o c ^Ic o o c a cI a!c 0 0 0 o a; a;oa000 i x x x x x x x xxxx x xx x x1 x�xxx'xxx ? U. U i j U J il -{ L, Lu!tJ L1 LJ- Li!U I ..i U U W JLu !-, CJ i o- a ¢ o f A I o ,a o { o a c oa o ocl a c oa coo U 0 U �A. \_� i .- o a U .�-. Q C ' ?J CJ ;{J C3 ,I J CJ .+ N C•J CJ3 1 CJ t CJ: J CJ N c a c o U I¢ 1 F o o a o a c a a iso a c o C� al cia o ao ,r U �_��E t;1 c { c a c .-. a •y7 0 7 v) •,. -: u1; ^la c-uZ b7 i!� C` .J V r ts!M J r •r CJ CQ V. - a3 r-JIN 1 -!0i { w A L.) I 4X LO! ! 0 0 o c c a c c c a a a o c o o c c o c c a L1 I I t c c c o a c c c r a ac a c caoo:caa I V J . .. a Fi 4J F, CJrlt-- ce rJ ?O ;.D „aD ?C',, .-�C ACj wCJ :.O D O ,�;M IC :D d N } z t , �- .Fi aa..Fj .Fl ,•, }-: J F� N Fl P c -Fi F 1 c ar .f c c o *• c . as of_ c, c 'a c,Lj L OT! '= T, DLI � 2 J � X31 L) C U t L.)i r L) -U =tl L) U C ii C? L L ._',_ C- - Id i i - ! L' z t [9 L) D iA Lit "Z 0 IM Ix L' - z z ? U U :.N C . w- J s_. t L H .:7 G7 z L ¢ F .. F 1 _. ¢ r U Ix LL D t+ D Q 3 w U D l X: >U Lu i z c: F ¢ D w z z D t Q 0 C 0 t- Li z 'I.. .t J :.Li M Cc ..al S O01) �7 z 4x LJ W UO U F 'r D 3 3 3 3 i Z Z ti T CJ N V., CQ CJ i CJCJ CJ CJ CJ - N C N ¢ U 1fi yl _� w a 4p i,/ V V +J tJ _ 6 J i w d I , R .+ :I M IoM opt�C`A CJ- R�+? -•' O? C-inm�v-1.�WA o .+w •..Oi(L oo ,•.++ o.a r!"jN .:L� z j! O C! q•iT n>\H }t7 K; c- r,t� U' ri ui:!':`: C•!e+ + O %N M ,.t,p a -110al i b 0 f I L I t ^ +I+ z r_ LU zIL, CL 5y Dz L zEzWI L:! +_I`"`i f s.:f �.+W W 17e r.( u) Q py I. .+ •w o;� L � �u7� :-� � ��t.,�� w: ( M"1 1': L 3-'A N tii \ ...y • 'L' CJ - =! \ ! ''moi r Q' n C' ,r„ {- z -z I CJ n1 + : "" CJ J CJ •i"�r3 'J -t - Vi a7 J, t i u7 $i Vi;t7 147 �7 Y7 ui d Y7 ..f •1 i:: II -` GIOao0 .:-0 CG ^0... G O C� 00 E5 1, c � v = co G ao Gi o ai oo IE Ii " } co ^c p c.oa ai a oI co XXxxxxx x xxxxxxx� x is x X �c e z I > s s + L. wu u +u � WI �' W u IW 6i j A \! L I' o 0 o c•o p c c a o "- o o� Ic Ll 0 ! 33 W 4.v r! J N N cJ' -'J rs eJ^J (' C}C ^J c! ^1 cQ .i) !V4J`i �� ii IV vi_ LSI+ c c c=oa o� o c oh Io 1 J I, co cicc c c oo .. o� Lr !¢+- tJl' � LI 3i 7.J7 I7 u ii Li.CJ !, ai i:.n .�M n di .-�I.- Icr ^ AI' pct ! cJic,4 st'!c r mq -W,t! CI rs M `ta Iv IQ Ix kz in F.. LZ n 7 E- ;F vi F- n ,F .•s F F II>- L"+ Z J :,ui F- 9''L.'7.o ;!-. v,,!" Ji F b7'F a F- `'+!F10 PA o o Lis F Ix S i t [ V " :,. z Li L* 7 L• Gi w I r- Ir LJO ¢ Q43: U -j z `J ¢ E _ to rN A A Q } 3 3 W > N z Cl- Ir 10 ITIN ¢ i z _ + =2 14X L 6 ° I t N a= o a o r7 L'? �o a s {� `C`�� '-`'"� 0 0 a .:3�t7+•� F I j I 1 14 11 1 71 ALU I ? a a�3 Cv7� Cl� C'C' �o© �v .-.i r -( �; pn 1 �?ca 67 �,�.., fK•t I I I CJ�J p ? JN !f a fJRi ITa� i? M47wvi . i I a � J I z Q a I i ca L i\a c- �i i 4 d16 7 I Z = ZZ IL r ii'Z G a{I qI f-rin i"3 IGO .12 �::Lt .? ulz I CD -Cl Cl- i! Ia M '.w a? Z Z •SIJ iR i .a a CJ = r1(c7 la ;i:i.+'^.. t'J .... ls.L. E:i fk� I;_ a _!L: _!� kk. �LJ iz 'v if.E CJ i .• a �_rc L3L: - s cal aIo to `a 'Ic is a I 4 a c clo IC3 i ocl alo Q ola c ac a .., c a as X Xj XtX jX IX IX 7C X I j 4I # ± llxZ ,.1 ; I i;j .L X X X-LU > > _..i I { ULS d a a, oio a o a a s cla :J 17 ri C-i J +fir Q i 1 nJ CJI J IC.# I r* iCa ;^•J !. CJ I CJ i s "•J fill -C.eI*+ Ij] I] ! 13 c 1 c� i is i....a • t:7c[ V� ca a.c is a ac j c o { a . ala o j 1. W A ! ca; a ad:{, opo N ^J '.t a o cJ a cla CD, Ia a ;o !cc o o• { ao ac i-: - J L4)b F , !- . F AT CqIt?Ft a }- ar:x 47 LJ F - F .o h i J F '3 h �-^ F - - l a .r a 4 r:. { #i� r aoLi =M L3 la a y a� o a ' a o L3 pior. 4 ri .fes WC) a rL ! . . U' t.C. _ .'` LS ;,. d t3 = { Z L Q o o z c z! -- I LU 3 j Q _. S L7:. Q r. 0 ' _ F ¢ 2 C Q Z F Fc CAIm ' tr3 J ! W fit Z I=•+ L° O :"?. ':J0 �-j [ [ F u >- Q Q c! Lt tc L•t+ R U z # ++ w G { a .. m la C a r Z a o v CJ N C I i:J CV CJ CJ C I �r v \— M rf n m n a C i Q y m n 1 m i .'� c:. O c :J C n ^ n i.'� :C •'„j I —8T •- i .i I � j � � LU in CO to i I ¢ ! I j •+ 1 1 I I: NZ i G I 0 o z i 3 � I F i N i G 1 , C G I: I +_a W I, N :73 z ^� Ci C ¢Q.r+ cr i ^J { C ^ £'J '- s Co j z 1 U >�X X 1:i c + a o i � A I aolao k ¢ t'} i a o a Gra ! Ln. L ft i 0T ` Im La v .... II i i„Z ! a r o ire 'tel „ I E.. f : ., _ IwZ� L U Z i C7 Z a . Q F J p it z Q W �. ! - W 3r.c X13 YL zc z of F Zi _3 c_ Q [] ! z "I h LD Q z ZI ZN ¢ i� �► ' —w— yr w -' 1 -6T- COOQ-c�o 0o wvi-T j ( I i 4r Z i in X" p,W A,ice. '•�5,'q j,. i ^ ••!'� Srl M f\ Cj a � E 1 I I � 1 1 Q J] { 1 z } a 1 11 L7 ? A ! ! V) ¢I¢ C CJ z 1 IL Z i ra c o i; j a 1 I I 3 z z! r {ire ! *• } a+�..I t-t! cis jv _ i c t v to :- Z >I i r lz rIO O-7 a O� OHO J {f ttI 1 i i j� ja j Z L'i t o L^y G^j t9I t9' 'J r = LL ; 8') mil it G ! yt tj iVj f ! 1 to ,i 4 j w { IIIIt co o� Q is ¢r � G I Qa at oQ i¢ILIul -- �rl v L'A a c'a Y III 'U..r ! C7 C. GtLj a r :i 1- ao de s!i\o L CO o_ :il Io o G ° o 0 0 i. wo L I U j W 3iF 1 J i7 t U Oc 4 L.I U C.3 ;+�CL iJ s Iz F � I Ir ? L j } z 1 E a i I C7 a Z 1 Z CHl { D }.. x CLIA �L) D (0 .� z � Li 1 I f¢ L5 - 1 J f' aye 1 �_�m n join o ml° - - - � of - �`a ��v � °In � �° nn�.-� '' o :. a � ��= ni ° Nin n - tom � u✓ � 1 I ff �A N I I � ! t o i i L3 I i ! _ Y JJ 0 LS i z ¢ *J N ir) Zi u7 c o C z i: cL r_ ^11 10 i i `: as Le)o U ,f[ E c ri iQ L1pI w t ¢ o I! 3 E Y 7! r;Y J� r� LU�'1 0 UU �, c I. i O� y � o i La L) l � UJ z i I Q I H ! V i I 1 3 E ef) UA m Z L J LD L ry � j rd ' o . r U7 U70 0 c o a o 0 0 c o 4? I �h u-)Lo W S t `?.O NN N Ob. oe NL'J 0+ w W hN RQ' 041PJN NM h ! I C3 1 � I O ! z ? cia . I i` 1 U i U� U7 , 0 '7 I C3O O I p � R i o sI S o 1 o i o O o o ;,} i I U Z ! S Z p Z Z Z I r-t i.J W U LLL iil LJ LA. cc J Li cm cD Z G Ln L U C9 - O O C F 9 i O o a O a a ci ! a o o a a a _M. rJ &'-1.- 1, C'J L'J vu N N PJ I u A 1O a o o 0 O z t L,9't- O 2'a U LL 0 u.U LI O, r L} J J J J J J U r ! Q Q Q Q Q Q C.) _ I JC ? hE^lO h0 3`.O O Lj Cm F fy ff [ o - W= i U Cr` L.s G L:• 0,5 CAU JLL 1 r+ wz s �x �S 7T 7z =>s U s tU ate �u c_L3 �t3 e.0 f 1 i z 1-4 o L c u u I I ! - CC 1-4 i z f i A Q Ln W ! Q - i J d Q F I. U LQ w 4T GI i L7 ..J u Q I rc I Ll L ULi i xc I I I 1 i O O O � JJ i I C Cc t.'J LLS U W Q J I E 6:4.! A A Q : C O d.� Lw i Q Q Q O I O U U U U L• t-t O 1, i i u ! 1 U ' Q 6 ' Q to L9 Q I ! Imo+ Li L L IO U? a ' !t1 .-+ O LD I I I I O U a C.J .-. ...I. o ! 1 O b I a ! o f c I o o ! f i7 U YLj a J z J cJ cr r. PJ N i X11 _ ter a 10 ! v w u v v v v �j w m a � I t —ZZ- 1 -• Q. rj ""s M CiN y_: 0 C cc COC IT !u I L? w •? c ,., _^,L? v N,cJ. =M^ N n L?Cj �c c ? ! tw t4'.. I 'f: sa Q 4 ^c- ^t ftl C'J ! i ; I vtj ZEZZZ Z; ctj X Y. X Y x X X X :L Y. X X X z -- U fLi CQ Ct, \ c c3= cj K; n N cs ra rJ Li ji L L ¢ U i Li o c c c a c a c o c i C ?- 7 V r`Z r Q }- Q T" '-` �:• i-- i,,, Q/- O.- ;;i- C3CO_ G7 W a. - aE, o u cU Uc... ..; is z = - U C-) -L3 - - __ L Ci QLa G =f z Li '¢ '. V V.? i ! - I v: Q vn - - :4a: Q IN * * O s s e o tet .,_ w w w w %a ki v ! CD � M. c *t...!?h q...�q 1'U,." ,... o 1,c{ A; c o: r+ •„*' ,., : i yr ?hih �7, 7 h o q:C-C.J' �:...q• ar c- W)! m.'.h.: C.l1 JJ_.. U..J N7 OI U7 47i i•3 ' M' � C C i - �: CJ ca I. i ; kR, I CJ — ti .1 Z : -I '- 1,0,0 ,-.e 1 iLi Li in 1") 47 u:D Y X Y X X X x X X Y X X X X X ZC' J J u ui'uw J 1 uJLi ES C-1 =1.r,J 1 ;•3 r! ^i Cti ^y,N C•i1 CV1 r3 rd ;4 oCQ n 41 J7 U.1 J E.J L- o c o o. c. c o c- c c c.,.• c c c c c o a .r >- 7_w. -qc s-. ^i F ^c- c s-. c.. �F- , i-- = -: F. U� }-. F Lj ;Q LJ L• a �. iJ L L _J _.`) -Ly. L' -_LJ L.) ^ L' L u L ul C.-L I _ H z Z. _s Q Z C .Q ¢ I Q i = n j 1 4D -- — — -- — s 0 qw w w V v a w %a v w iii 0 lop � CM. 'n C C a N ,i C-11 .4.c n,i i i\ _,�t.''3 .+ .�U7 w V'a -T i I z f G, Lui _ 2 z' � e _ _ _ _ ¢ ^a i Z h: C 3 M, r* J;.:z Z LJ Oi _ J .K-,^-+ .r I z tri N n : G s t.+A z z X X X XxxX is X: XXX X X Y.XX X Y. XXx � D. _t - A \ C CNi \ '.t r1rQ N C.-.1=�f-d . ^J ':'�}'. C', ri : f•E N,rt.,C] N rQ, ,j c-.-,r1 CQ ru r- Q O ,.,Li A - A j Q J c CJ _ E3 L. a .r a 0 0 ..,. ,� a o c a' c c c c c c ..• c o <E Q Q IT CD 03 roo ca :.J ... ii C C L Lj Li Wi :>J-� -^ cx it CL r jLi az <L - 'I z f - z Li Z I_ �_ I ? � cr i �I �,'. i � SII � ! •i { '0 c.... .0 ��L?. c c'c L^,c�? ^ V co. C... J: ui t+i'.it!tei 57 Lia iM CJ oil q a :c-. vi ' 4 :.;C.*"' {i,. �,, _ _ C. IA L+. '.,D CJ I- `.Li in ^ ON G... J 1 ` a ' ! ( ; i a7. 1 j I C3 f i 1 i I ire r.tr; fm 0 C7 - Ys� - -i J 3 J L I _ _ C4 ?CXX X XY.XX Y.X XX X X,x XXX XXX XXX X X X?ZX - CJ ._. J Vj N d N.J N n CJ c--- <r �� :moi �. �^. '� � �_ J O +.� ,.. n: M°'^:... M;.�!+'�.Tr.3";.n M ua j � : r� P']-•.rt r O M V' c---CJ r4 v7 �"�. 4r C V C `T .4 G':ri'.K. "°'Q cp 7 v' Q C er i ' c a c ca a c c c a Li C n 1 n Lo c c �� -T } Z !de i taJZ Gl : 77 ,_t Q 17 s V < a a I _ CQ I 19 T : aL. ..+� o C�[� * c c C a M (D _ a o .� ._ �.! -r c 7 M c C`3 ' ! Z.. *� M M ,u'7- n ;•n te• u? .o v) C- z W4 y 1 \ z ! - } ' _ - - I 1 1 '" Cl- X t -- Q y — ..i \ i l z - - r X X X X X X X X X - X X X X X X X X Z LJ LJ W, Li }` - - Li CD a o aCD \ M•: ri i C'i Cil -i ^i - CiN, NI r Ni vj an- z I i t'i Q'_:Q C ? Q V V a Q Q s �' C.!C•J �J Ix U1 ! I Y Z ,J c 'r c- = F-' 'r =i s.- �y s,. Y F_ a r L Cv' JLJ L ,•r — ~ J' rr ? J —J > Ly i.3 Z Z �' H Li z CD _ ¢ Y -0U. ¢: — Q t i r z — — 4 — z Z _ v _ L7 z M _ 0 Q Z i i i I M QC E I v w w w w w w w w w €y .a v til W s _ w w i • I 1 i .. c a c o ..,o -. L^ a�.'-t*. ca a .^.'c c -o c (� -..d,J M •�+. b-)�. -. - I t W m L•7 rz o.... ,.., r q v+ ^..!J7',@Z c'c""' o.o o."' � C•.`'^+ .,Ac.... L Z Qc ''u� o:oc67 ? c-.. �;a e+; P:na !.�J.: l n i•J-„ L CJ[V c a7 �' 7 ?.C) t?. 14t4 " i 1a.Y I.. J Q I - Ct G.¢ .+ ,-•I ¢'LV., } R I� t' X X X X. XX X XY^£X X >: YXX X XX XX ?SX .XX X Xi <L c O 'x7 ocD .J') :i J s1 o c a's .+ 0 a tD CD c c c- .._...r c a o 1 - n _� _ - LU 0 z �. 6 ;Z ] J z E_ '^ Q Lp- z z _ IT i 1 4 W-1 w W- w �r • � d v ca m .r r.,m t- X I f r e v t�o�r,.- a,,r.L cr Ld r.v � w ,U z' L7 -�� 0 o r7 , VJ< .-,.4 '4 ^C e�-a c-" ri 14 co 07 i �: 1 I 1 • � � 1 � 1 j 1 I .r . " i . �a - ; V. LLJ Ji �?iF?ip n u. _ "7 2? s._ - is 7 I s. � .X X x X X Y k X X X x X x X XX>: X X X Y.X X U X X Q Z _ _ —_ .- �:3 .� t _ o c - W Li GO — �- ,i.- rj r Ai-!�j 4 i Li ZQ v V v = - z e } a - ' E i 1 i , .6Z_ f zi I to i LU C�. i t -:+ 1 rte--. �� I F i i. '• �� ' 63 zi r LLei �` ` a � , X XXX X XXX X X Xd: y fn r a o Ql-i v Y ti cy- f— Ltf — a`' c.... a Z i _ L""• ' J ` z C Cl i 1 ! 1 _ _ - - ,v L: � i�' � Fes.'•_�..._;`� '1_ :__ - a I Lj�i PJ LL _ z V } Z U c _ t=. z i Z Q i Q (, 1 I 1 { , 1 i i ! Q Z -- J - a z :- LU - o _ Q EAL La Li ,-+ J m - tai. c o M LL :il .J t7-7 — Li UEj i JS c3 i I ^ o1 C C a O C. O J a OI 0 '� L7 L7 o L7 a I o =1 L1 L7 i cJ ;tom z{ `0 'I !'A \\ O Q Q 1 fi .j r` N rl . AI v a,Lt7� ,-, ..Mj f.: �¢ i! t7Ji MI V. f.I r3.i � s \ \ C3 ca C3 ca Ly \ \ \ \ I 1 I I { 1Li ' I _ I r i IM W i til r. tel `�`.`•,',. J a a a O o o i \_ {; fJ CJ _tLi 77 z ^ C c r C LJ 1 1 Li LJ Z CO I I i o Li ( G a G ¢ I I ( I airy Ci fn w F F - ! z Q ¢ ¢ ¢Li LJ i i I i I i j =a t ¢ i ¢ ¢ 6 f L1 Z - `miCQ l o 0 o f C- o 0 Cc- Li 0 j ILII; i 7 2 I O� I P I P i U i t� 0:0 a I I , i t i m CJ..m .0 O��.-.. a c! a oI o o a y7 o:C C ,o 0 o(D did c U) d 01 CJ a O C' a 47,17 47 o'. O O 4� f_.Z I C i.7 ,. C O' Ci C y7 rJ CO _ ,a 4':� v'�:.7.� 'C o O O �i m a. rJ N: fJ CJ 4 ._� 1''G 57 N. o!�, P C C3 a•7'�97 rr. ''n3 'J, •-� S 4 ��, o v (\ \t M x'j: ::1 .J.rJ QJ. d '.'�r+:'.`h -C C ;+J CJ j rJ ' ar. i rJ N FJ CJ cm' .- I ;`� rL I I ? ! z a ? w + ! r, a ;z` j rJ a ! t- ' I _i J-tv 1 ,F � F Iv t- ':`n ',^r0.+ 'F^ ! .:6QQQ¢! ZZ z2 f ..^. Z IQG-¢Q Q'-33.>33i r'"t+:e-+ 'L ':.Z ,-1 to� 1-4 � -.-fi J 1 3 3;3 3 33 0 =,=c oF f ¢¢3�Q. :,3 \ o o..c O LJ :'L. i ! Li ? `t dQ' a* QeTo S � ^J � - � ^o AI a.I N ,}.Jrj :J^jd ¢ , t-t ... I. ca .v .7. Q O N d' w.,-.co ^ 4 d d 4'v. O o a c o c a O + LY �. I #'i 7 i°').•s _ _.+ C: _ _ 6 Z a o 0 0 _ ! r i e 0f,3 __ _ N N.CQ i ..I.•s." r...•.rJ r•. u_L- _'ti a- Z r c o a o c c C t o c o c o x X x.X.x X x. x x x x x x x x x x 7C X x X x x Z .t Li _. I' _J J T :J."J:.J ><�j _i W c_+u1 L2;J -L Lj L6i - Li ' �!il O. " 00000a ¢ ?'7 F�n rte.. '.i J f 1 J. CJ C1 n?n,�"^.- n7 n _ +i �'4 r,. d cF' +•� r.J .J o U3 ry j .•J:J. CJ. rJ rJ N Cj fJ r ^J rt., CJ rj Cj r.t'a.J rJ r.J N ^-J N f QF F c a= ac. c a acc o oc o a F.a. Com c c oa.on d`7 M.T7 =� =�4 . r3 {o ?z d d`�:4 d�'}4 C d 4 ''- rJ rJ=J `rJIx u _� ¢ t7 � cocaco c ao=occ^ acc= 00000 o a L-i �'' r T„n r.�-� r. h IN T..+r•'-+ .-.r+r+ r.+r» w..r+ r*.•+ ..+ :� \t1 4 U ¢ Q Q S Q 4E Q 4r ¢ =-' J = ,-� + r. d CDF F F f l F sE'L9`=N p C.�= -t NM 1._ a c F cat- r• F d y') N R: i O d O a G"^ .- -.-.— r,.+ 4 O C,^ } �-' Z U. c c o C ^ ,-�F .- a.•. F ,rs .*r.,�. .-e a- _F s. .+ F ,-.F F o r'•: O S+ aaa C O o 'i '_'C Gn o i.: C O U ± ¢ ✓✓ I i O 3 41 tj :J > S+ L Z z Zi Q Q W LJLL. ',Z I o ' - v u Z [ I L O ¢ 4 I ¢: ZLi Ix A U3 4M' LJ f o Z r f'J fJ :1 z It iri I l :" _ � • C J rJ � rj � � I r: � rJ rJ i O C C 'n - N�N —ice C..._'. ':,•— _C i w_r r _�_t v C, I c o t_ - LlMa © U') C*- U-)0, CD pCJP i,7LJW CJ ^! p7MIt GP7 , . a Li co w J.p N i M M u K, rl L7 c}• -!�"^ -!^! -+U•+ O O i -'M ^• NC! ClN_ h h', hc�; O ;l�7u ^ 'J�l j' Nj i I � I i . r_ I I J ci C3 co i uIX = _! _; t w u i i Lo ca z a <T. <C C, Z z = c _ - __c t _ _r >x CL r. .•+ Lu a _ 0 O 000 QQQQQQ QQ' - 1 _ t :_t z ^ L! - i w �'' ?'? ?:l.i n:t7 r«i �•_".r.O Q \ ^.! a7 1 v7 7 .i -_s n Q I !? 7 >i. 7 _ r .?17 Z X X X X X X I XXXXXXX.rCYxXXX JX XX c - c a c pcac Do - a o' D �' ,` � c c a i7 ac=_ co coc •'�'o cc a p' p L a'. J M M M M t•7 a c p p p c :`% Q N — a Q' Q Q V Q i aCJ-j c•J u �.!Cj Z%jr h \ \N N. IN\ Q U11 �' :'J :! N N - :°J'J Ca n!C_ t J !CJ: J N :!C'J N N NI Q L7 U p C O O p C a C a a a p p p - Q F D a O O O p Opp O C C p o D 4' o N L,i �i.. c a v7 N 0 ` r tV1 M M a i'7 rlD N v D ,-..CJ J M-T M ^c vJ-J.,`+-: a•M ='e:, rl U 4. t .... O C O O O p O O a'-�• D .� — D a O C^J O C p O p p p Q Q Q Q Q <C Q c L F `' F" �t F. F ^}- h }... �- 4 F D a - C'.J F,,,, ,-. '- a7 <f V v Q O Q O c~t a O Y7 b7 C7 O -T O �- _ z �J ^ F _ F ^F .-.?••_ ^F ^ F -r,s f- -" F n!,. .+ .. _:' l-- fiJ F ..- o t-+ D c c o p c C3 c u? 7 87 W) 7 117 c Wu o u D o u c u a w > s tj U ¢ ._ U t..) r U —U Q n-L! — L; L U. _c. D rL i z F� Li Li Z I z z u C7 I u i 1 U i Ui - CfI ^i z I Q QI u zi R! L%' CD O 0 M C'"C.^S Lo C'J a �',t�, I-,.•• ..Q Q Io a �o c Ic q c C 'C'J M �+�, c o! o a t5 o FI S G -"+. O O C',O SSI M"•'47 e-..+ IQ q I\C• iO O ,a O :�7 L7 G Srr C o a! a O O T SSl Z O i. G w Q'.:1 a'Q CJ C'S.. :q C �.L1 v tP..C� �a C ?Q '.+T 67 d3 �.u7[�. J'. L7 ..�.0 r� O N C•J 0 N 3 G*..n C Q C �M.m '.� iN� �v 0 ,GS:M .'"eR. IT.J T.., 'V'` wl -T n d j\ T Q' TT T !'rI CQ CJ as ca { i i i I 1 I {T iz i � Zi Li i z ? !333.3333 IZ I• .¢ I,:.. �Q d !¢ T �. W'. ! L z z z Z z Z. Q I I� "") L U I II > U L U E.3 ,•,I.t3 :r") _Z ;!7 O .:. C5 • �; > ! {i Q. � i a. ,CC oc �O !:a •a Ic c o C? —i ' c ac 000 c o c a ^ c o al +' X X X x X X X.X X 'X 'X 'X > 'X. .> X X X X X: X C W Y7 u7 c c a a o a c .P7 a c a c o o al \ vi ^S C'S�� .I.:!PJ"S fS C•J 'Sr.. Cti ^S N PJ PS Cri C`S >.i :a! - C z ? i t !••-_ l -, a- i 4I J 2�O�{� :i7 z C eR 0 O O a T e+' '• LD o IT r..= C-j a rn cli IN xo a ro r; IN v sr r^ L v IN T .+T T .+ .T. .•-, oc.c acc- c a c a a a o ca ' a cc o -- C_ L_ J J = - ¢ U �- r - �� F F e'r CF •F nF �F �F "^ F o Ti- U Q u 0 O ^'O 0 o m b C O `I;b „7 0 ,v - } C!� .3 F .:}- T F cr F T F r' Q F \ Pte. E5 a a p c Ck c~ a 2 C' o Lu a C- a of� 'c L' ou ofJ c c u cU a: U C i U U LL U `s•-u G L c-L3 i C U G.U of —L' 0. L.3 C.I. _ a.U i Z Z t^ L f I E - LLI ! z rn F r' J _ r. ce Lj Li c z ¢ - u Z J _+ - L: ¢ `a t z -� v U F :-t Z Co. 1 z ? ¢ ::W ¢ e ¢ CQ J Z 'r CQa ^a j r 4tj r., N N zN +. CS CJ i CS C'S CS CJ C'S C 03 CJ PS; ii a ca. p0s co caC Cal dd: o .. _ :,?i+": t', f!lcoC: t+Col V) 0 c i:0 0o C o a! w M .^+:' c c O C>N NNPJi ',_+ _?L7' t,p N CJ- v C'd .^co d ^i\c PJ j`?u? ^,•,•. .3 Qi i I i ca rq i i =' I ; r , I i I ; I f c I I I I 0 0 r i Ij + Lj C-�L L C i 1 \ O -O O ... +i ZI 3 zZ ZZZCZZ - C-- -RR( Lj j L' Q �a r ¢r- �- 3 ^' ^ .,: �'dd Q'Cd `f dv '^� ^ • i.1 PJ v C^ L C' iL- a o c X X > X X' X: X X X x x xx x X Vl _Qy; rJ PJ V J . \ '. ^J ^J P d N - .J ;d ... f-J :J f J f, fJ:^•J + r .J^ '"=n M V .* Q - F i c Li ul. ►. ' CJ CJ P`7 r? M d - c M - L c V^J n_v �'-.IT ,•. J 6 Q S i sU LLc o a ¢ ulc V c o c� aa^ o^accts cc !: 0 0 o a a c a a C a c a c C a C c c c C c O J QCQ _� Q G r' ::.0 CO d0 Ll) u. O �O .^„O. � C nIn wG' v --.3 �3C >- c Z L:i t- c 1- .r.,h- r!.•.'r .-.F- tj I•- C "r ,••t- T''r•- a�- ." ca co J? w L O w is V z U a :-i j Z } L ¢ Z - z:i X Z. J Qr ::'Z Z! -z u L.I 7_ i r.J ?.i J CJ ,�+ c �•* ! f .~+ ,-`,, �. j i IT aIqd v C" =0- 'PJ f., .PJ fJ C. C. N P. fJ f" j (Q Q u Zi i I I i I I ri 4? I I `{ Q N.JA P ':"^ ? cJ rIo QCzs CJ G.-J D' a o 4?u?� c.7' at J d,a o0 47 ia? U,co f i C47L 7vN . . ? ..••p C, W47 ...c?,�,+ o'CIC ni CIJ Cjr C• CI Qw cC CC nom- PJ<S' Q• f .-. Z�: i q .u.•-w-A fr+Q '.o o 'r+.D C6'" '`f.0 a 1� G'1 U? its J+• j c..-' o'o C o oG^ CJ.?•+ •-,`� Lr D i Q' O N w t•I*q Q; ^ .JIQ' _?.••. o� PJ �� tA. i:7: �:y? c'o +-' h C j I { i I i Ni I l PJ C'J 1 zI a I t L I f I R � rI w t- r. Z' I Z J u Y..' I V :Z Z u a- rte " I R:' Z'. X I :> :3 Z f Jai Qi. 6 t,rDSD -. !F D :Q :. z i C. LJ. ; L Z Q Q<1 sj Z L' — 'Inc "'.. .�•-•-, .-:�+ z f Q S' J v c ^ m fh A IN N id Ed CJ aj:f'.i CJ aJ,C•J N u s x X X X 'X X`C X X x X X Y X x X x x Y X� XX x Y X xi z ..� Lj J iii ._I _W u_ :.I Li :W11 LJ I ...W. ::_I _La F _ •� c o o `ao a •? c c c � J 4? U c — o ;j? r 4? 4? Q CZ L7 t„ cCQe C, ^.i CJ :,J _.e.•r c n id n.�'V7 - Li ¢F F j.J L. ::� ._. ::z -� ..:.0 GC .CCC caC �� ... It? ...y A : 'It R u ,r i:: i. O �'C '.O O .... Ca.^. CC'•% o O CC a� O a OOO '. L Q Q Q Q Q Q '¢ Q Q Q _ W C F C F rt, F v'- (� F -. F n F n F' n F z"F n F n -+••• o u c E D n ti c _ G a_ c' is a L. a ;.3 C CL) O :1 0`. OU LLI O 6 Z. 4r, i Z. ¢. _ Lj - L Z 7 U •_ d G"i Ll Z Z _j 3 Z z Z D z i w Q I Z Q L1!. Z' j I. O J tLl I } Q i Z Q. llI J ZCl- ¢ < ¢ ¢: 13 o Z _SI n :J CQ r *` ;r c I I n t f�J I n .J j G } I 1 I i z., 1 s q \ i 'N j C ( I PJ PJ I CJ r:1 n C PJ,, I L; y , I f a. + rr r dr _ ter ar 49 w %�o F! k w 41P ca cc IIv C.� o0 0o t,to co'o - co o nn4w o�N LD ac C14 PJ QQ ac oa cc PJ. in I q �4^N P']�O^? 3'L,"' NN I 'J Z J a a O o o c t:3[A c N\ 'w ti C£. -.G ar 'o+; Q'v7 r)1,-J t- ':7 N _ [ ivj ! j i .tcj o j Oil U. C, 't j J J=J=`J =Jv!. LJ CI- LiL I ... .. V J I i a: X X X X X X X },X XXX XXX }<}C XX' XXX XX X � _ 4 LD ` Q ? Ctp C a O cD ca N N P J N PJ ?J s N F s ri N J J PJ " ri PJ £J lV PJ U r Q i t Q A c c o a a a c c a c ^a p a o it ia! r! ;s? :,i - ? o c ? =C i Q r3 £il st' M err17tom} t, ^. T t^ V tY Q CJ Q PJ Q U Q U LL. Q E c o a c ^ oa o c c j .+ 'y" r* *+ c-� !� -.� -.a-. r•.rs r* -K—-s y s-.— o '1 r r✓ -`.O -C CQ r"Q #-- -r+:.^ i-. _.(•- t^ ~a.. L? \ _37-.3C+. C"i"" '•- -7, Q O^ __ c.- o a.^ :J PJ N:O G C o O Z-_ [,i- -.r er'_ ?- w i- e+!-' 'o!- _ ,�-";-+_"r,,..eK s-.'-'_ C C i... ...}- co ltiS [= c o a a o o c c o p a a~ a Ld U U s Z zCl- r i Q j U Q :` ulLi .. Lu Q i - Z _ s', Z' ? Q '3 - j > i N rr Y Q ¢i N F.: PJ CIJ PJ Y'J :PJ :N CQ: i i G <z u z'! V_ tdv w w w 0 • i I c c o c 47 yY c a; m K a'•^ c o PJ:d". 'C'C jcc ac GM ocj 4f CO`t ao 00 �':dc di oo as co ac oo {A 4� LTJ Z' i 4% �f Q''' PJ..'Q N'cJ PJ.P: d:':,,� 47 Ul ' ,wy Q N C9 _...a :Ei.P^ 1'4 *4 ':H yA ^4* y i t l I I i i i I i j J I t e j t i- I iGJt3 '\ r I. i \ ,^. I L3 '. .i LP ..i!: is': Z Z _ '3 Q u, ,•• :J i s J vI L ` t Z' L'� Z Z ,r- -Q CQ " {{ J I f- I J z Z. S:e. -0 .0 ca L75; t 4; z„O :.IN Imo- �] z ce Lj £9 X X X X X X X', X — L :1 1 W J' L J tom: _ i EL r- I— Ez O O 5 C J C G a Of N ra a-J V - d Q Q 4�• `. Q Ll L d PJ :S N PJ J ,~-: ^J P!'J -PJ \ J PJ PJ ?J PJ rt. PJ PJ Cd N PJ V +-* PJ L) > J - Ga Zip O A M N M ri .-�PJ r? M PJ C 'J ¢U Q t ? - _ O C o ^ �- c7. t- •. J i- ti i' J i- P7 F- 1\. !- it? C to J i:d C Crl 0 -oi- ZD CF- :DO ?' Z W..; r `.- •,-,F- .•*!- e••F ,- !^ c#- s'.?.- ..: !" �_ ;- !- r t- C s- •ls?_ i\'r c h- o _ .r� c c c G c" a _ c d LU U C J O j U C aV: �U _ �r.3 :.L+ Li G.;3 n. U "U �-U SLS .vT _U -L? -Li Z.. Z i i LJ - °-' Z I ¢ zi J i J:. H z v �j J _ L J- 7 _ z. _ z Q J. u1 z- ::i. !-1 J z L I a. Z > Li z U,, -Z, e..3 y3 z J PJ ^J C' CJv'', - cq• P J >-s £� a i Ni r - ,.J i^J tJ iN o NI CQ a :-J ,- - C•� .•J j i ca _ L L J PJ J PJ; PS: PJ' PJ PJ P f4 PJ C'J 1 j c h f r o _ _�+ s- : _+-� -. a _�-. `_. -__• • s - , - a-�i_• ir_: • o �1 lar +® w _ sir w w w IW to W k Q k Q v to w w 1 co ao a ac ccs cry o at ocoaG^ acc V C. oG oo oo k.f a o r* --. o aaW ^!Cj20 <tCv cpQ Qv Nj 'tJ Z f f v v ss�y'. G ^ £•J n, O M a o - -Z fJ ," f \ f W,in !`tri Jci . u'.r� M ,: _ o� f ;. �^•-., i•.0' t� ^� cf 'M C3UJi ! I I uy a e.� - +",_ }- r t r- t--•r t-; _ J? ¢ _ c C4 L9 ZzzzZZZzZZZZZz. j F „' O i Z , z Mc�c,Mx ¢ J - J u u UUu LJ i J s s„ .-r._ t-�-.F F r• s- m! c 4T az z z v Z zzzzzzzzzzzzZZ: f• CD _ a F C CatC a. t X X X > > X j X - X X X X X X X XXX X X X X X X: X' Z '- ,e -. o U rJ er .+ c K v q et C Q Q T+t e• 4 eF' V r \ ? ^•i ;..I '1 rd N N ?J _ C'-1 'J -' `CQ N OJ�J —�'v-, "1^j!': =} CQ at at c _ c C z O 1 4t.' :� _ .L c.,.nJ P-.)4' '3.� d L ?F M O 'J O -` O ti yf f€lC, ;\f ff ::VO C. F c. c t• ,., F. c F .-. <-�,-•-. .-:-� -.-, +- - ss ef' a a G G _ a a ,,�aaa ul U .- L3 r- -C.: r..0 -U �- L-, a V -£J G U - G- - i2L• -� -U iA • O � - - 5E M !-1 Z L J Q LJ Z _ J C L7 ?"k •: L;7 Cl- o z 10 O z Li 1 L? •J -J n- nJ Z :J i•J N .� .J Z; ! <r IT r z oa c *�t s f` rs rs i iN ¢: Z rJ cJ i j c c sr �- _ �r _err s►_ v � � � � .. ver ® - � �- �► c- p in _ C oI I da Q=da c c 'o id I •-� G t� .0 .::: m N o .j'r-j q Q h-�'.,�Y' nj CJ tj I I Z a z QLa v.+r a za r+Ilti ! Li = , t 4tr ¢I U L NI IN U .+ Z c c a a a'a aE5j f. X X X X X X X X X X U tea- U [ O a a C _ A z F!-j u - L ^� Q U A �. 4 Vl i T U Q . .:� Y•: v A a o .?. Ll _ — W Z s ,U i Z z f. i.. - J FLD Z il L." 0. LJ — t•+ . U Z LJ ci Xc iLl Li z LJ Lj LJ a Z E a c o rj j j > z i x U = Q z t __ - . - - �,, n. ., r n n •.. ... .. ems_ Zto, < - w ID n :a CJ C7 N i oo ¢ E5 Y ca :H Q a I'll P' 10ri Qi? him J^� I LJ ..; CJ.. :_I eJ Li F 1 LJ Yl ` ri N a E w I LiIc _^': c r - •t i i o a ac a X X X X X X X X X X Z _ ? u _ eyl _E:.i Lij_ Li Li - z i ti a a L o a c o o cp o - oc c _ Q a ¢ c Q £s Q W O _\ES ca c C _ z U U _u 0 _ U -U- ^C, _ U z Cl i � F Ll Z i F Q Z cv� I i ' Z Vj ` CJ C ^J Cl.,SI ^.i ! U�U7. a. a c.a ,d cli a o. r.,. X7,3 V't J Y i U7 I '. N i k 1 f I j 5 I r7 U: :�� ! I � I I I cJ� i { ZZ W; a o a s a a D a Q M n p 10 U7 _ U7 E3 ¢ i ! 67 � o n c Ute: :i J L r Z uli u ♦— is i— U7 ~ w st1 r - Cil _ Ci L. ce Uj a U a c .. LL z _ �., _ _ p2 cc � u v — Ix i _ r i j LJ.. .I i f Z ex ¢- .�zi - Ll j - _ z M z Q i ` z o z -Z xi Lj > zi ' La G. Q ti I i O w - t 7� •'3 f � � _ I � I � z i CD z 3 r+ i i A Q ..r Li .Z IJ.i L — te ce - W= a :J { Q • • CITY OF ATASCADERO' FINANCE DIRECTOR' S REPORT JANUARY 1, 1985 TO JANUARY 31, 1985 EXPENSE LISTING PAYROLL DATED 01/09/85 CHECKS #32759-32869 56,416.24 PAYROLL DATED 01/23/85 CHECKS #32871-32963 57,631.20 VOID CK#32825 CK. REG. DATED 01/09/85 (765.89) VOID CK#22976 CK. REG. DATED 12/28/85 (80.00) VOID CK#23033 CK. REG. DATED 01/10/85 (338.40) VOID CK#23118 CK. REG. DATED 01/18/85 (69.61) HAND CHECK 22390 ENTERED THROUGH JOURNAL ENTRY 50.00 TOTAL 112,843. 54 45 Sv OUNCIL MEETING: 2/25/85 AGENDA ITEM NO. : A 4 M E M O R A N D U M TO: CITY COUNCIL February 25, 1985 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: Acceptance of PARCEL MAP AT 810305:1 LOCATION: 13505 Old Morro Road ( Ptn. Lot 7, Block 95) APPLICANT: William Fortington (Hilliard Surveys) On May 11, 1981 the City Council approved Parcel Map AT 810305:1, subject to certain conditions and in concurrence with the recom • mendation of the Planning Commission. Three subsequent time ex- tensions were granted for the map. The required conditions have been complied with and the final map is recommended for approval. HENRY ENG N RALPH H. DOWELL, JR. Planning irector Acting City Manager HE:ps • G bIA o UZ Ifcc .� NNI 41 L _ [I.• v Sc 1,\ } jam, _ s - D -� � --li �i •"�. /Jai w r � ,}�'1 y }5,,, IIX La Vl r czz _o IgUNCIL MEETING: 2/25/85 AGENDA ITEM NO. : A 5 • M E M O R A N D U M TO: CITY COUNCIL February 25, 1985 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: Acceptance of PARCEL MAP 26-84 LOCATION: 8200 Los Osos Road (Lot 19, Block 37) APPLICANT: Kathleen Nimmo (Twin Cities Engineering) On November 26 , 1984 the City Council approved tentative Parcel Map 26-84 , subject to certain conditions and in concurrence with • the recommendation of the Planning Commission. The required con- ditions have been complied with and the final map is recommended for approval. l HENRY ENGEN ( RALPH H. DOWELL, JR. Planning Director Acting City Manager HE:ps • gg n ill LLJ q V 00 c � 'J OL , Lk 1 r �Iri - r ItV 11.T' 3 9p 11 -- NL1�'M OUNCIL MEETING 2/25/85 AGENDA ITEM NO A 6 • M E M O R A N D U M TO: CITY COUNCIL February 25, 1985 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: Acceptance of LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 6-84 LOCATION: 8375 Los Osos Road (Lots 14, 15, Block 37) APPLICANT: Brian Estes (Westland Engineering) On June 25, 1984 the City PP Council a roved Lot Line Adjustment 6-84, subject to certain conditions and :in concurrence with the • recommendation of the Planning Commission. The required condi- tions have been complied with and the final map is recommended for approval. HENRY ENGENQ� RALPH H. DOWELL, JR. Planning Director Acting City Manager HE:ps • 5�� w ¢ uj Ly- ciiCD g� =3W WiW CL 0 ED w4 v ll: r _ fir,. M.�:Q�b��' zw3..� .. � �.°.' •$.,�_:.w., _ .•' ;.-"-•- <�: F • g=� w W uQlw u�w - � w z g ag m� W - w. >At Wm�.a Z w 5 u f3a3.x al iL VI o 4 f I •_ �j� so '�, 1.. o . l s , tUNCIL MEETING : 2/25/85 AGENDA ITEM NO, . B - 1 M E M O R A N D UM • TO: City Council February 25, 1985 VIA: Ralph H. Dowell, Jr. , Acting City Manager FROM: Henry Engen, Planning Director SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 1C-85 LOCATION: 8800 El Centro Avenue APPLICANT: Michael Yeomans and Joseph Lindsey REQUEST: To change the General Plan Land Use Element Map designa- tion from Moderate Density Single Family Residential to Low Density Multiple Family Residential and to change the zoning from RSF-Y (Single Family Residential) , to RMF (6) (PD) (Multiple Family Residential) (Planned Development Overlay - 6 units per acre) . BACKGROUND At the Council' s February 12th meeting, the attached staff report and amended site plan was referred to the Planning Commission for a speci- fic recommendation. On February 19th, there was a hearing held before the Planning Commission which resulted in a recommendation for. approv- al of the General Plan amendment and PD rezoning for 24 units. (The recommendation came on a 5:2 vote of the Commission. ) RECOMMENDATION Consistent with the Commission' s recommendation, enclosed herewith is draft Council Resolution No. 11-85 approving the general plan amend- ment. Should the amendment be approved, the PD rezoning can also be approved with staff directed to bring back a formal ordinance. HE:ps ENCLOSURES: Draft City Council Resolution No. 11-85 Planning Commission Staff Report - February 19, 1985 • 0 ! Revised 2/19/85 RESOLUTION NO. 11-85 A RESOLUTION OF THE ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP CHANGING THE LAND USE DESIGNATION AT 8800 EL CENTRO FROM MODERATE DENSITY SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO LOW DENSITY MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (GP 1C-85: YEOMANS) WHEREAS, a request to amend the City of Atascadero' s General Plan has been received as follows: General Plan Amendment 1C-85 : Request submitted by Michael Yeomans and Joseph Lindsey to change the General Plan Land Use Element Map designation from Moderate Density Single Family Residential to Low Density Multiple Family Residential. Subject property is located at 8800 E1 Centro, also known as Lot 24 of Block 4. Negative Declaration to the provisions of C.E.Q.A. is to be certified. WHEREAS, this request was considered by the Planning. Commission at hearings held on December 3 and 17, 1984 and on February 19, 1985 with the Commission voting to recommend approval of an amended project containing 24 dwelling units; and WHEREAS, such amendment to the General Plan was considered by the City Council during a public hearing; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65323 provides that a General Plan be amended by the adoption of a resolution; and WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Atascadero finds as follows: 1. A General Plan Land Use designation of Low Density Multiple Family is consistent with the policies of the General Plan document as proposed to be implemented by a Planned Development rezoning. 2. The proposed General Plan Land Use designation is located within the Urban Services Boundary and will not have a significant effect upon the existing level of services. 3. The proposed general plan amendment will not have a significant adverse effect upon the environment and preparation of an Environ- mental Impact Report is not necessary. NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Atascadero does resolve to approve General Plan Amendment GP 1C-85 (Yeomans) as shown on the attached Exhibit "A" . . On motion by and seconded by the amendment was approved by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: DATE ADOPTED; CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA By ROLFE D. NELSON, Mayor ATTEST: ROBERT M. JONES, City Clerk APPROV AS TO CO T: RALPH H. DOWELL, JR. , Acting City Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM; ALLEN GRIMES, City Attorney ��- N W / W J J o N JJ C. W WW Z= J Q W 1, Ep 0 { 1= W Vr� O JZ0�Q J { H vl s V m U T H U W 1 �W 4.. Z r• x � , 0 O a 1 _ Lni -4 7 :S l . .........::cic'ctc:. J W J U 9 i :w< J A V t =[t O J- Ll }JWQLL i; .. c QIa-sWO�u TT Ww - =CC i:`........ is ,< sa'.UUSa- Z Q; mOa is oo. o /� �� � �• � ti;::::.;i.;.. . ..:.. 1..�lam: E-q w Q k a CLaa u.CL LEa JZ J J J Z Z Z ZZZQ } t 3� pao4 WpOWpC]Co s. \ ©•w4 s3soG3mc ooh 00 =J=MJNC 086 A ... ......� •.� - '^::}I \ *�[, 4 004 C, }}!! l c1 od e c t. t:. w' !f 0 i �c, 0000 •o e. ..... . a e ` 0 0 to 0 o c 1"".�C��resf'4L��o.ta:..�' I�� ....,:. /..::......... a, i:�. co�,c4oc,S::c•000^c...::..... ...... T City of Atascadero Item: B-3 STAFF REPORT FOR: City Planning Commission Meeting Date: 2/19/85 BY: Henry Engen, Planning Director File No: GP 1C-85/ ZC 7-84 Project Address: 8800 E1 Centro SUBJECT: Request to change the General Plan Land Use Element map designation from Moderate Density Single Family Residential to Low Density Mul- tiple Family Residential and to change the zoning from RSF-Y (Residen- tial Single Family) to RMF(6) (PD) (Residential Multiple Family, planned development overlay, 6 units to the acre) . BACKGROUND: On December 17, 1984, the Planning Commission held a second hearing on this two-fold request and concluded with a 3: 3 vote which was consid- ered a technical denial of the request. Thereafter, the matter was forwarded to City Council for hearing on February 12, 1985 with draft Resolutions providing the alternatives to either approve or deny the general plan amendments. On February 7th, Mr. Yeomans, applicant, transmitted a revised site plan containing, 24 dwelling units (5.06 units per acre) to the City Council (see attached agenda packet) . The action of the Council was to refer the whole issue back to the Planning Commission for recommen- dation on both the general plan and the revised PD rezoning request. The City Council has continued their consideration of this matter to February 25, 1985. ANALYSIS• Staff recommendation on this project had been for approval subject to the findings and conditions contained in the staff report. The February 7, 1985 revised site plan improves on the earlier site plan in terms of protecting trees, reduces density in deference to neigh- borhood complaints, and opens up an open space parcel to the rear of the open space along the drainage way paralleling E1 Dorado. RECOMMENDATION: Based on the findings in Attachments A and B, staff recommends: 1) That the General Plan Land Use Element map designation be changed from Moderate Density Single Family to Low Density Multiple Family. 0 IGP 1C-85/Zone Change ?-84 (Yeomans)Genera1 Plan Amendme i 2) That the Official Zoning Map be changed from RSF-Y to RMF(6) (PD5) . 3) That the zoning text be changed to include the establishment of Planned Development Overlay Zone No. 5 as follows: 9-3. 649. Establishment of Planned Development Overlay Zone No. 5 (PD5) . The Planned Development Overlay Zone No. 5 is established as shown on the Official Zoning Maps (Section 9-1.102) The following conditions of development are established: (a) Development shall conform to the approved Summerfield Devel- opment Plan as modified by applicant' s letter of February 7, 1985. (b) Development shall be subject to any City-wide development fee schedule which may be adopted by the City Council tQ__m�e HE:ps ATTACHMENTS: A - Findings - GP 1C-85 B - Findings ZC 7-84 February 7, 1984 Communication from Michael Yeomans February 12, 1985 Staff Report to City Council 2 General Plan Amendment 1C-85Y o 'nd ( e mans/Li sey) ATTACHMENT "A" - General Plan Amendment GP 1C-85 Findings for Approval February 19, -1985 FINDINGS• 1. A General Plan Land Use designation of Low Density Multiple Family is consistent with the policies of the General Plan document. 2. The proposed General Plan Land Use designation is located within the Urban Services Boundary and will not have a significant effect upon the existing level of services. 3. The proposed general plan amendment will not have a significant adverse effect upon the environment, and preparation of an Environ-- mental Impact Report isnot necessary. General Plan Amendment 1C-85 (Yeomans/Lindsey) ATTACHMENT "B" - Zone Change 7-84 Findings of Approval February 19, 1935 FINDINGS: 1. The proposed zone change will amend the zoning map and text to be consistent with the Land Use Map and Text of the General Plan as required by Section 65860 of the California Government Code. 2. The proposed zone change is a logical extension of the existing land use pattern and zoning in the area. 3. The proposed zone change would encourage development which is con- sistent with policies set forth in the Atascadero General Plan. 4. The proposed zone change will not have a significant adverse effect upon the environment, and preparation of an Environmental Impact Report is not necessary. 5. The following findings pertain to the establishment of a Planned Development Overlay Zone: a. Modification of development standards or processing require- ments is warranted to promote orderly and harmonious development. b. Modification of development standards or processing require- ments will enhance the opportunity to best utilize special characteristics of an area and will have a beneficial effect on the area. C. Benefits derived from the overlay zone cannot be reasonably achieved through existing development standards or processing requirements. d. Proposed plans, if any, offer certain redeeming features to compensate for requested modifications. r✓ February 7, 1985 RECEIVED FEB ? Mr. Henry Engen Director of Planning City of Atascadero ATascadero, California 93422 Dear Henrv: Attached please find a revision of the site plan for `the ' Summer- field proposal. The project request is being reduced to a total of 24 units. The overall density presently being requested is 5. 06 units per acre. Some minor adjustments with the site plan coupled with the re- duction in units has resulted in our being able to preserve more of the native trees population and increase the amount of open spaces within the project. ' -It is our hope that these amendments will make the project more palatable to those who have expressed concerns about the proposal. If you need any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you. ' Sincerely, THE YEOMANS-DILLON GROUP' Michael P. Yeomans bj Attachment I TEM B - - RE I _; SITE PLAN - (24 bNITS) ?3 a N � N I ac �0 DCS i d 3 4 I m rs- N o L • i • M E M O RAN D U M TO: CITY COUNCIL February 12, 1985 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 1C-85 LOCATION: 8800 E1 Centro Avenue APPLICANT: Michael Yeomans and Joseph Lindsey REQUEST: To change the General Plan Land Use Element Map designa- tion from Moderate Density Single Family Residential to Low Density Multiple Family Residential, and to change the zoning from RSF-Y Single Family Residential to RMF(6) PD, Multiple Family Residential, Planned Development Over- lay (6 units to the acre) . On December 3rd and 17th, 1984, the Planning Commission conducted pub- lic hearings on the above referenced request. Considerable public testimony was heard at both hearings as referenced in the attached minutes excerpts. There was also extensive discussion among the Commission with the final vote being 3:3 which constitutes a technical denial of the request. Therefore, resolutions providing the City Council with the alternative of either approving or denying the general plan amendment are attached. Should the amendment be ap- proved, the PD rezoning could be approved with staff directed to bring back an ordinance. c^ HENRY ENGJN RALPH H. DOWELL, JR. Planning Director Acting City Manager ATTACHMENTS: Planning Commission minutes excerpt- 12/17/84 Planning Commission minutes excerpt - 12/3/84 Planning Commission Staff Report - 12/17/84 Planning Commission Staff Report - 12/3/84 Sierra Club letter - 12/17/84 Neighborhood Petition - 12/3/84 Planning Commission Resolution No. 10-84 Draft City Council Resolution No. 11 -85 (approving) Draft City Council Resolution No. 12 -85 (denying) PLAN14ING COWIISSION MINUTES EXCERPT 12/17/84 Minutes Planning ommission - December 17, 19 4 MOT —Made by Commissioner Wentzel, seconded by Cner Car o1l­and carried unanimously t the request and to require curb-, ter a ewalk on the San Jacinto frontage of the Commis Lilley took his seat back on the Comm si 4. General Plan Amendment 1C-85/Zone Change 7-84: Continued hearing on request submitted by Michael Yeomans and Joseph Lindsey to change the General Plan Land Use Element Map designation from Moderate Density Single Family Residen- tial to Low Density Multiple Family Residential, and also to change the zoning from RSF-Y to RMF(7) (PD) . Subject property is located at 8800 El Centro, also known as Lot 24 of Block 4 in Eaglet #1. Negative Declaration to the provisions of CEQA is to be certified by City Council. The Planning Director referenced the staff report and noted that this matter had been continued from the December 3rd meeting. The nature of the request was reviewed which involves first, a general plan amendment, and secondly, a planned development rezoning which would lock any future development into the configuration being proposed by the applicant. Three letters were reviewed which had been submitted since the last meeting. The first is from the ap- plicant, Michael Yeomans, in which he indicated a desire to revise the project to reduce the number of units from 30 to 28 to save a significant oak tree in the corner of the E1 Centro frontage and to provide on-site recreation space and save additional trees. a letter from the applicant's engineer, Dan Lloyd, noted that they have re-calculated the land area and that they believe that they now have 4.74 acres which results in a new project density of 5.91 units per acre (5.43 units per acre being indicated as the density of the adjoining single family frontage on Arcade Road) The third letter is from Dr. Avina from the School. District indicating that in view of the crowded conditions occurring in the Santa Rosa School and other attendance areas, the District is requesting that any approvals for new construction within the City carry with it a condition calling for mitigation the impact on schools. Staff is recommending revisions to the original recommendation to 1) Change the PD rezoning being requested from RMF-7 (7 units per acre) to RMF-6 (six units per acre) 2) Accept the applicant's revision to the development plan (let- ter of December 12, 1984) and add the following language to the PD rezoning: " (b) Development shall be subject to any City-wide development fee schedule which may be adopted by the City Council to mitigate impacts on schools and other public facilities." There being no further questions by the Commission of staff, Chairman Summers opened the hearing to the public. 4 [ • • Minutes - Planning Commission - December 17, 1984 Mike Yeomans indicated he would prefer to speak at the end of public testimony. Jerry McCarthy, Assistant Superintendent of Schools, stated that the District was not anti-growth and they appreciated the approach being proposed by staff. Their situation is that they are 110 students over their current capacity, especially in the Santa Rosa School which is the largest elementary school in the County. 40 students are being bussed out of this attendance area to Santa Margarita School. Lewis Avenue is also an impacted school and there is discussion of eliminating libraries and cafeterias to provide future classroom space; in addition, double sessions. Dan Ross, Principal at Santa Margarita School, indicated their concern over maintaining the quality of the program which could be overwhelmed by students which number 370 - 60 over last year 's. Gil Menand,' 8829 Arcade, spoke against the project stating he did not want a tract type development as typified in Paso Robles and Santa Maria, and stated it was a case of the people versus the developers. David Mosher, 8895 El Centro, stated that the last rain had lifted the storm drain grate and that this project would make things worse. Mary Cunningham, 8495 E1 Dorado, stated that they live on a 2 acre site and that this project would not be compatible with the other acreage parcels around the area. Greg Bascom, 8890 Arcade, noted there would be a direct impact on his back yard with lots that are effectively 3600 square feet in area compared with his 8000 square feet. He commented that the density figures portrayed by the applicant were not equivalent, expressed concern that a ten foot high retaining wall would be needed behind his house. Peggy Bascom also expressed her oppo- sition to the proposed project. Bill Remple, 8475 El Dorado, cited serious problems with respect to police, fire, flood problems, the loss of 2/3 of the oak trees, overtaxing services, cramped conditions, absence of recreation, a density within their fence line of 8. 64 units per acre compared to the density on Arcade presents a radical change. Fred Bush, of the Sierra Club, submitted a letter expressing con- cern over the environmental quality issues including zoning, den- sity development, removal of oaks, altering natural streams, and traffic. He stated a traffic analysis is needed. Mary Richichi, 8540 El Dorado, stated that the water that runs across her driveway is bad and that this project would make matters worse, and stated that at the time of incorporation, the residents were promised a rural environment. Charley Richichi indicated that 1/2 acre rezoning might be reasonable and noted the petition with 91 signatures in opposition to the project. 5 Minutes - Planning Commission - December 17 1914 Jerry Ludwig, 8550 E1 Dorado, spoke against the project. Charles Wilson, 8873 Arcade, stated he was appalled at the thought of 30 dwelling units, and felt that the location of trees had not been accurately portrayed in the applicant' s submittal, and ex- pressed concern over the harm that would be done to the trees by the filling proposed to the rear of the parcel. He further ex- pressed concern with the fire service and adequacy of water Pres- sure, as well as the traffic pattern down a narrow street. Monica Parker, 8883 Arcade Road, stated she had lived _ there for six years and felt there is a need for a traffic light on Arcade before any development is approved, and felt that policing and no parking along curI;s is also needed. Claudia Tantum, El Dorado Road resident, stated she was a four year resident and noted her opposition to the project. She commented on detention basins that were rejected on the Lucky Shopping Center in favor of a drainage ditch. John McNeil, city resident, stated that it was appropriate for neighbors to speak first but that others such as himself feels that this project is inappropriate. He stated that more needs to be done to mitigate environmental impacts and that the project is not in the spirit of the General Plan for a rural community and is not compatible with surrounding development including larger lots to the east which are not shown on some exhibit. He refer- enced specific statements in the General Plan relative to a large s lot community with private open space. Bob Schinske, 8530 El Dorado, stated that reasons for his opposi- tion have already been stated. Robert Cowens, 8990 Arcade, stated that the problem is that the problem is that the architect' s project is in the wrong place and questioned whether an eight inch sewer on Arcade could handle the project and expressed concern over the Fire Department's lack of review. Robert Nimmo, Bella Vista resident, indicated he had no personal interest in the project and felt there is merit to the proposal, and felt that if this project is denied, there could be a request for moratoriums on other projects. Ron Stewart, Arcade resident,. agreed that some development on the site was appropriate but this project was too much. Bill Tortino, area resident, stated he had learned from past res- idences in Stockton and San Jose that the residents should get necessary services first and then let the builder- develop later. Alan Ross, Arcade resident, stated he was against such a project which would generate much noise within his back yard. 6 ��; Minutes - Planning Commission - December 17, 19P Art Cunningham, 8495 El Dorado, felt that many issues had not yet been answered and that an environmental study needs more data and he questioned the lack of description of the sewer with regard to the soil characteristics. He stated that if the Commission can ignore 91 people' s concerns, that the City is in real trouble. Joe Malin, area resident, stated that although he dives on the other side of town, he is violently opposed to this project, and felt that 22 wide street is too narrow. Mike Yeomans, applicant, indicated he had tried to repond to the neighborhood concerns and generate their support but had failed in that effort. He noted he supported the development fee ap- proach proposed by the School District and stated that most towns have them. He further commented that there is a need to provide these facilities and that $700 is a reasonable average figure. The project attempts to provide affordable housing, not low or high income, and it is in conformance with the General Plan cri- teria for infilling. Mr. Yeomans stated he has attempted to save the oaks and indicated that staff had advised him early in his application that the project location had merit but that there would be neighborhood concerns and this proved to be so. The project does provide for one story homes and channels traffic away from the neighborhood; drainage is taken care of in a per- manent open space to be maintained by the project; landscape plan provides for buffering between adjoining properties; it is afford- able because smaller homes are wiser during these times. He fur- ther stated that adequacy was provided for in the manner in which windows were placed and side .yards are utilized forP rivate open P space; there is no other way of obtaining an RMF-6 type project in the City and the cost of RMF-16 land would mean that a project of this type would result in homes of $120,000 , and that the proposed PD rezoning provides for maximum control Chairman Summers asked for comments from the Commission. Commis- sioner Lilley indicated that since the last meeting, he has heard many of the public' s concern with the project and that he shares many of these concerns but would respond to some of them by stat- ing that the project cannot be discriminated against; and given the School District' s problems, that would be something to be worked out between the District and the City. He further stated that the state-mandated Housing Element directs communities to provide for affordable housing and other forms of housing such as those that exist on Arcade; and the Commission needs to respond to innovative solutions and problems such as drainage can be resolved through proper engineering. Commissioner Carroll felt it was a good project and the smaller type housing is needed and it will have to fit in some neighbor- hood. At this point, a representative from the _ School District sought clarification that the District did support the planning staff ' s recommendation for language looking for mitigation of their concerns. 7 Minutes - Planning •Commission - December 17, 1•984 . Commissioner Wentzel indicated he thought it was a good project and the location was a good one, and wished that there was more support from the neighborhood because he did not want to ignore the public testimony. Commissioner Sherer stated that while he missed the last meeting, he had listened to the tapes and reviewed the minutes of prior testimony, and felt the density might be a little too high and he would seek a compromise in this area. Commissioner LaPrade stated he, too, had familiarized himself with the files concerning the prior testimony and he advised that in his field of real estate, he sees a need for this type project which would provide for covenants, conditions and restrictions to assure better maintenance. He further stated that in addition to the neighbors, he also had a duty to represent 17,000 other resi- dents in the City. Chairman Summers expressed concern over the density increase and stated that the problems had to be resolved before committing more density which would include circulation. She further stated that this project is precedent setting and the fact that it is a tract type of housing, she would expect more planned unit developments in the future, and would prefer the single family approach to the multiple family density. Chairman Summers noted she would prefer that there be a focused environmental impact report on this pro- ject dealing with drainage, public services and circulation. At this point, Engen advised of the process for general plan/zon- ing amendments and that the Commission' s action is a recommenda- tion to the Council and that a public hearing will be scheduled' before the Council. He also noted that should the project be approved, there would have to be either a precise plan filed or a subdivision map, both of which would entail a notice to abutting properties before any building permit could be issued. It would be, at this point, that detailed conditions to mitigate problems such as drainage, etc. , would be determined. MOTION: Motion made by Commissioner LaPrade, seconded by Com- missioner Lilley to approve the General Plan Amendment and PD Rezoning subject to the findings and conditions in the amended staff report. AYES: Commissioners LaPrade, Lilley, Wentzel NOES: Commissioners Sherer, Carroll and Chairman Summers Engen noted that a tie vote means a technical vote for denial. Commissioner Sherer raised the possibility of, revising the project for fewer units. Mr. Yeomans indicated he would prefer the pro- ject go forward as a tie vote to the City Council. Chairman Summers called a recess at 10:15 p.m. 8 4/. YLHIVLVl1Vl� l:Ulvll"11551ULV 1�111VU'1'r5 �Xl.l';l{Y'1' 12/3/84 Minutes - Planning &mision - December 3, 198 lStaff recommendation is for approval of the change from Moderate Density-,to High Density Single Family Residential for stud . area along--Palomar including the Bunyea' s property. John Bunyea, applica`ht,?.inddicated he was in port of the staff recommendation. Lon Allen, 8891 Palomar , spoke---and 'cated no objection to the proposal. MOTION: Made by=_Commissioner Wentzel, seconded by ommissioner Carroll, and carried unanimously to approve en gal Plan Amendment 1A-85 subject to the recommendation contained! in the staff report. '`�J Q 7. General Plan Amendment 1C-85 and Zone Change 7-84: Request submitted by Michael Yeomans and Joseph Lindsey to (a) Change the General Plan Land Use Element Map designation from Moderate Density Single Family Residential to Low Den- sity Multiple Family Residential; and (b) To rezone from RSF-Y (Residential Single Family) to RMF (7) (PD) (Residential Multiple Family, Planned Development Overlay (7 units/acre) . Subject property is located at 8800 El Centro, also known as Lot 24 of block 4. Negative Declaration to the provisions of CEQA is to be certified. In summarizing the materials contained in the staff report, the Planning Director indicated there is a two-step process being proposed to change the General Plan to the lowest possible multi- ple family residential category and concurrently rezone the site to RMF-(7) (PD) to allow for 30 single family units on a private loop street on 4.29 acres of vacant land. Engen referenced General Plan criteria and noted appropriate loca- tions for low density multiple family areas off of arterials and outlined the rationale for staff' s support for both the general plan amendment and the PD rezoning. The public hearing was opened and applicant, Michael Yeomans, in- dicated he preferred to comment at the end of the public testimony Greg Bascom, 8890 Arcade, spoke in opposition to the project based on traffic congestion at El Camino Real, drainage problems, police fire, school service, and bussing of school children to Santa Margarita, and the lack of compatibility with the City' s uniqueness. David Mosher , 8895 _El Centro, opposed the project and cited water problems from the Lucky development, traffic, noise and indicated there would be no benefit derived to any one in the area and that the City is not learning from the previous mistakes made on E1 Centro. 4 Minutes Planning &mision - December 3, 198 Ruth Winan, 3440 El Dorado Road, indicated she purchased her home in 1983 and cited school and drainage problems with this project. Anthony Winan, 8440 E1 Dorado Road, expressed concern over drain- age problems, grading that would redirect water to his lot and felt this would be a Los Angeles basin type zoning change as it is his feeling that the City is already overburdened and does not need the project. Wayne Barnard, Arcade resident, spoke in support of retaining the rural atmosphere and noted that the visibility onto El Camino Real is poor now and he uses Cascada. Bill Rempel, 8475 E1 Dorado, noted the project looked like a trailer park and talked about. the site' s drainage problems flooding onto E1 Dorado. He spoke on open space areas for Atas- cadero and felt the units were too narrow for the density pro- posed. He also commented on the number of trees that would be removed as a result of the project. Charles Wilson, 8876 Arcade, noted his opposition to the project and spoke about environmental issues and safety hazards and felt that too many trees would be removed. Mary Cunningham, 8495 E1 Dorado, felt the City should stick to the present zoning laws and felt the project looked like a cheap trailer park without wheels. Diane Bernard, Arcade resident, spoke to protecting the naturall beauty. Howard Franklin, Arcade resident, desires to maintain the area as it now exists and that the project would impact the area. Arthur Cunningham, 8495 E1 Dorado, presented a petition containing 91 names in oppositino of the project to Chairman Summers and com- mented on the problems that would result from this project. Statements in opposition to the proposed project were also heard from Jolean Rhodes, Bob West, Frank Buckley, Earl Peterson, Dick Hart, Bob Shinski, all area residents, who cited such im- pacts as concentrated population, circulation, access and drain- age problems. Michael Yeomans, applicant, commented he had approached the pro- ject with the knowledge of a previously applied for 90 unit project which had been denied in the past. He had researched the Public record on that denial and had developed a plan with the neighborhood in mind. He noted the project would be established off a private loop road which would channel traffic through the . commercial area. He- spoke- on the one-story units to provide pri- vacy on the existing abutting homes. He felt that the proposed density would be allowed in a normal low densitysingle family 9 Y district. He commented that the drainage problem has been recog- nized and been provided for with retention basins onsite. Mr. 5 Minutes - Planning Amision - December 3, 19840 Yeomans also spoke on the neighborhood-wide drainage problems that would not be compounded by this project. With regard to the 0 school problem, he noted his wife, who is a school teacher , had to transfer to another school from Santa Rosa because of a develop- ment impact, but that people need new housing opportunities. Mr. Yeomans pointed out that the project is not a mobile home park and noted that a homeowners association would maintain the outside of the buildings and exterior lawns and stated this project would be primarily for families purchasing their first home. In response to question from Commissioner Moore, Mr. Yeomans noted the general price range he would anticipate would be from $70,000 to $85, 000. Mr. Yeomans elaborated on some of the features pro- posed for the project which include fencing, landscaping, private street with no through traffic, homeowners maintenance of land- scaping. Commissioner Moore expressed support of trying to provide a dif- ferent type of housing needed for first time homeowners but wasn' t sure of this location given neighborhood opposition. Commissioner Wentzel felt this type of project was better than some two-story condominium projects. Commissioner Carroll stated this type of housing is needed but could not support the project because of the density and the neighborhood opposition. Commissioner Lilley stated that businessmen such as Mr . Yeomans would be driven out of business if innovative type housing could be vetoed by every neighborhood. He stated that the PD request is quite a commitment on the part of the developer and can be a has- sle. The Housing Element mandates that we provide opportunities for all types of housing in the community. Only 10% of the people in the United States can afford 90% of the housing. Chairman Summers indicated this particular project was precedent setting in that it does take the form of tract development which has historically not typified the local area. Going from four lots to 30 is a dramatic increase and there is a great deal of undeveloped multiple family zoned in the community. It was noted in prior discussions that traffic needs along E1 Camino Real need to be discussed and she hoped that the future joint meeting be- tween the Council and Commission, that this could be reviewed. Commissioner Moore wondered how many people on Arcade Road could afford to purchase a home in today' s market. MOTION: Made by Commissioner Lilley, seconded by Commissioner Wentzel to continue the public hearing on General Plan Amendment 1C-85 and Zone Change 7-84 to the December 17th meeting. The motion carried with Commissioner Moore and Chairman Summers dissenting. 6 r City ofAtascadero Item: B_ 4 II STAFF REPORT FOR: City Planning Commission Meeting Date: December 17, 1984 BY: Joel Moses, Associate Planner File No: GP 1C-85/ZC 7-84 Project Address: 8800 El Centro Avenue (initially 8555 El Centro and 8500 E1 Dorado) SUBJECT: Request to change the General Plan Land Use Element Map designation and to rezone from RSF-Y to RMF(7) (PD) . BACKGROUND: At the December 3, 1984 meeting, the Planning Commission conducted public hearings on the above noted items. Afterreviewingthe Staff report and considerable public testimony, the Planning` Commission con- tinued consideration of this agenda item to the December 17, 1984 meeting. Two revisions have been made to the attached staff report: (1) including a negative environmental determination finding for the plan amendment proposal; and (2) revising the address to 8800 El Centro. ADDITIONAL MATERIALS Following the December 3rd meeting, the enclosed letters were received from the School District, the applicant, and the applicant's engineer. The School District is seeking an additions condition of any approval which provides for some form of commitment to mitigate school impacts (for this and any future housing projects) . The correspondence from Mr. Yeomans contains a proposed revision to the project description to modify the project to reduce the number of homes from 30 to 28 to provide for a recreation site and to save ad- ditional trees. Their engineer has also advised that recalculation of the site area indicates that they have 4.74 net acres (see attached) . With a reduction in units to 28, this translates into 5.91 units per acre compared to the 6.99 units per acre indicated in the initial application. rj` General Plan Amendment 1C-85/Zone Change 7-84 (Yeomans) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Based on modified findings in Attachments A and B of the December 3rd staff report, staff recommends: 1) That the General Plan Land Use Map designation be changed from Moderate Density Single Family to Low Density Multiple Family. 2) That the official zoning map be changed from RSF-Y to RMF-6 (PD5) . _ 3) That the zoning text be changed to include the establishment of Planned Development Overlay Zone No. 5, as follows: 9-3.649 . Establishment of Planned Development Overlay Zone No. 5 (PD5) . The Planned Development Overlay Zone No. 5 ' is established as shown on the Official Zoning Maps (Section 9-1.102) . The following conditions of development are established: (a) Development shall conform to the approved Summerfield Development Plan as modified by applicant's letter of December 12, 1984. (b) Development shall be subject to any City-wide develop- ment fee schedule which may be adopted by the City Council to mitigate impacts on schools and other pub- lic facilities. HE/JM/ps ATTACHMENTS: December 12, 1984 letter from Michael Yeomans December ll, 1984 letter from Dan Lloyd, project engin. December 10 , 1984 letter from Dr . Avina December 3, 1984 staff report r 2 ,j ; • • December 12, 1984 Mr. Henry Engen Planning Director City of Atascadero Atascadero, California 93422 Dear Henry This letter serves as my notice to your Department and the City of Atascadero that I wish to delete two units from my "Summerfield" proposal. My reason for making this request is twofold: 1. To provide an open space area which the home- owners association can use for a future park or childrens play area; and 2. To provide me with some latitude in my final site design so that I can save more of the significant trees on this site. The second unit to the right of the entry (see enclosure) has been nominated by us for elimination because located in the center of that unit is a magnificent oak tree. That tree will be saved, and hopefully, become the focal point of the open space park or childrens play area. I have not made a decision as to what other unit to elimi- nate, but will do so as I develop a final site map for "Stuamer- field. " In 'doing so, I intend to shift some units around in order to save as many of the significant oak trees as possible. Mr. Henry Engen December 12, 1984 Page Two This letter should not be construed as a'"promise by me that all of the trees can be saved. To make such a promise would be foolhardy and less than responsible. _I will, however, strive to save as many trees as I can for I believe these trees will be an asset to both my project and the community. Sincerely, MICHAEL P. EO NS bj Enclosure 4!8 i ' v a• wo / b • '1 I I s I I I 9/4- EXTIj 7.YL'E RATA/NED /�FJ V--- TflfS U�/T fOR oP��5P.9G� a ! 11 December 1984 , Henry Engen Planning Director City of Atascadero P.O. Box 747 Atascadero, CA 93423 Subject: Yeomans/Lindsey General Plan Amendment Dear Henry: I recently had a discussion with Mike Yeomans regarding the Planning Commission hearing for his proposed General Plan amendment. It appears that several questions were raised during the meeting which need clarification. Some confusion exists regarding the actual acreage of the parcel. We have researched all of the existing maps related to the project and the general vicintiy and feel confident that the site contains 4.74 acres (not including streets) . An actual field survey of the property is the only method of - obtaining precise acreage but based on our research of available records, we have no reason to suspect the site is any different than 4.74 acres. An issue related to the site area is density. Mr. Yeomans has indicated to me that he intends to reduce his project proposal to 28 units. This equates to a new project density of 5.91 units/acre. As an added comparison, we calculated the density of the properties fronting Arcade Road between El Centro and El Dorado, adjacent to the site, as being 5.43 units to the acre. Drainage was another issue of concern expressed at the Planning Commission hearing. During our early design layouts of the site, we purposely left portions of the site open for detention basins. The intent of the basins is to capture all of the site runoff and release a smaller amount of water as determined by the City Engineer. This will effectively eliminate any increase in runoff from the site due to construction. Realistically this on-site design feature will reduce the downstream impact during peak storm periods because the outflow is regulated to a lesser design storm. Our design philosophy is to allow all storm water that travels over and through the site to continue unrestricted. We will, however, intercept the runoff that presently enters the properties on our southeast boundary. This will not effect the runoffi currently flowing along El Centro and El Dorado. i `y' 1 F! j r i} i 1 I Ni H T ! :I J4i'� L iS 0 O yr I . vJ' J4� 'vbI ff� • Henry Engen -2- 11 December 1984 We have made numerous visits to the site and are very familiar with the layout and design of the proposed subdivision. The issues of drainage, grading and road geometry have been thought out and we are very comfortable with the concept. If you have any questions related to items I have or have not covered, please give me a call. Sincerely, ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES Daniel R. Lloyd e il e Atascadero Unified School District _ "Where students and their education are paramount" rt r-C I"I r ? b. 6800 LEWIS AVENUE ANTHONY AVINA, Ed.D. ATASCADERO, CA 93422 District Superintendent PHONE: (805) 466-0393 December 10, 1984 Mr . Henry Engen Planning Director City of Atascadero P. 0 . Box 747 Atascadero , CA 93423 Dear Mr. Engen : Our Board of Education will be asked , at its meeting .of December 10th , to approve a resolution declaring our schools impacted . It is my understanding that, at the same time , the Planning Commission will be considering approval of a 30 unit housing proposal in the Santa Rosa School attendance area. Currently , Santa Rosa School is impacted and students are being transported to Santa Margarita School . The school will not be able to accommodate any additional students , thus the District must ask for mitigation from developers constructing homes--not only in the Santa Rosa attendance area , but in the rest of the District as well . Lewis Avenue , Monterey Road , Santa Rosa , and Creston Schools are at capacity at the present time. Since Creston is not in the City of Atascadero , it does not fall within your jurisdiction , but the other schools certainly do. Our high school is also at capacity . It is for that reason that we must ask that any approvals for new construction in the City carry with them a condition calling for mitigating the impact on our schools . We hope the Commission will attach such a condition on any proposed developments in the City with those conditions to be clarified further with the school district . SiAcerely yours, I � �ir/ - nthbny A'V l,j Ed .D. District erintendent AA : ejs cc : Mr . Ralph Dowell Carrisa Plains Elementary • Creston Elementary • Lewis Avenue Elementary • Monterey Road Elementary Santa Margarita Elementary • Santa Rosa Road Elementary • Atascadero Junior High School Atascadero Senior High School • Atascadero Adult School • Oak Hills Continuation High School . City of Atascadero Item: B-7 STAFF REPORT FOR: City Planning Commission Meeting Date: December 3, 1984 BY: Michael Wixon, Planning Intern File No: GP 1C-85 / Zone Change 7-84 Project Address: 8555 E1 Centro and 8500 El Dorado SUBJECT: Request to change the General Plan Land Use Element Map designation and to rezone from RSF-Y to RMF(7) (PD) . BACKGROUND: The applicant, Michael Yeomans, is requesting a change in the General Plan Land Use Element Map designation from Moderate Density Single Family Residential to Low Density Multiple Family Residential. Con- current with the General Plan Land Use change, the applicant is pro- posing a zone change from RSF-Y to RMF-7 (PD) . Notice of public hear- ing was published in the Atascadero News on November 23, 1984 and copies of the notices were sent to recordro ert owners within 300 p P Y feet of the subjectro ert . P P Y i A. SITUATION AND FACTS: 1. Request. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .To change the General Plan Land Use Element Map designation from Moderate Density Single Family to Low Density Multiple Family. Also included in the request is a change in zoning from RSF-Y to RMF-7 (PD) . 2. Appicant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Michael P. Yeomans 3. Property Owner . . . . . . . . . . . .Joseph Lindsey 4. Site Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.29 acres i 5. Streets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .The site abuts E1 Dorado to the east and El Centro to the west. 6. General Plan Designation. . . . .Existing: Moderate Density Single Family Residential Proposed: Low Density Multiple i • General Plan Amendment 1C-85 (Yeomans/Lindsey) Famiy Residential 7. Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Existing: RSF-Y (Residential Single Family, 1 to 1. 5 acres minimum lot size) Proposed: RMF-7 (PD) (Residential Multiple Family-7 units to the acre-Planned Development overlay) 8. Existing Use. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Vacant 9 . Adjacent General Plan Land Use Designations. . . . . . . . . . . . .North: High Density Single Fam. South: Moderate Density Single Family East: Moderate Density Single Family West: Heavy Commercial and Retail Commercial 10. Environmental Determination—Negative Declaration to be cer- tified by City Council. 11. Adjacent Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . .North: LSF-X South: RSF-Y East: RSF-Y West: CS and CR B. ANALYSIS: The first step in reviewing this two part application is to review the proposed General Plan Land Use change with regard to General Plan policies. GENERAL PLAN Relevant land use policies in the General Plan are highlighted in the attached excerpts. The development proposal includes 30 single-story, single family homes on approximately 4.20 acres, or 6.99 units per acre. The General Plan Land Use element divides multiple family residential uses into high or low density categories (see Page 60 of General Plan) . The low density multiple family designation allows a max- imum of ten units per acre. Therefore, this development proposal would be properly classified as a low density multiple family land use. The existing land use policies are useful guidelines in evaluating the proposal. This site is within the Urban Services District and is also in a transition area between commercial and single family residential uses. Hence, the project acts as a "buffer" between high intensity commercial uses and high and moderate density sin- gle family uses. 2 - ., • General Plan Amendment 1C-85 (Yeomans/Lindsey) Pertinent general plan policies relative to the form of multiple family housing proposed by this project include: "In keeping with the desired character of the low density residen- tial community, development of each multi-residential area in the future needs to be considered in the light of such specific fac- tors as the topography, the traffic circulation, drainage, fire protection and the general level of use intensity at that location. " The proposed site is in a transitional location to the rear of the Lucky shopping center and commercial zoning. Traffic would be directed onto El Centro Cascada to El Camino Real. The site is flat and within the Urban Sercices Line. "Low Density - Shall be permitted in areas not adjacent to arterials and may be permitted adjacent to single family residential. May include duplexes, triplexes and fourplexes, but generally no more than five dwelling units per building. " The site does not have direct access to an arterial. The appli- cant - through the PD rezoning request - would limit units to one story, detachedsingle family homes to be compatible with single family development which generally rear lots (Arcade Road) and side lots to this project site (El Centro and El Dorado) . The density proposed is lower than conventionally allowed (10 units . per acre) . The density of abutting residences on Arcade is ap- proximately 7 units per acre while lots to the south are approxi- mately .75 units/acre. ZONE CHANGE Should the General Plan Land Use Map Designation be changed to a low density multiple family use, the site could potentially be zoned for densities up to ten units per acre. However , the appli- cant is requesting a density of seven units per acre. This is allowable under Zoning Ordinance Section 9-3.175 (a) which states that lesser densities may be specified where warranted by certain site characteristics including, but not limited to, drainage, sewage disposal, etc. Given the site 's peculiar drainage and lo- cation, the reduction of density from RMF-10 to RMF-7 would be warranted. Included in the application is a PD (Planned Development) overlay request. . Under Section 9-3. 641 of the Zoning Ordinance, the pur- pose of a PD overlay zone is to identify areas where development standards or processing procedures may be altered to promote and enhance orderly and harmonious development with best utilizes the special characteristics of an area. The site development presented in the attachments would warrant the PD overlay zone in that the development standards for this zone could assure the single family character of the site plan presented. 3 ! • General Plan Amendment 1C-85 (Yeomans/Lindsey) To simply rezone this site to a RMF-10 (Residential Multiple Fam- 0 ily, 10 units per acre) would leave the owner the opportunity to change the development plan in a way that might be inconsistent with the adjoining single family lots. The plan, as provided, is now consistent with the area to the northin that the homes are single family detached homes at a density approaching seven units per acre. A Planned Development overlay zone for this area would hold the applicant to develop the property as the site plan shows. However , four findings must be made before establishing a PD over- lay zone as per Section 9-3.644 of the Zoning Ordinance. Each re- quired finding is addressed individually as follows: 1. This Planned Development will promote orderly and harmonious growth in that plan would be compatible with the existing single family development pattern and that higher density single family homes near commercial areas has inherent bene- fits, i.e. travel time, energy conservation (gas) , neighbor- hood support of commercial uses, etc. 2. The special characteristics of this site, including drainage and natural vegetation, have been addressed in a thoughful manner , i.e. open space area along the El Dorado frontage acts as a buffer to lower density single family homes and also acts as a water detention basin for drainage. 3. The development of this site may occur without the PD overlay zone. However , as stated previously, with a PD overlay zone only the project as shown can be developed. 4. The primary redeeming feature of this project appears to be the compatibility of the density to the high density single family homes to the north and screening from larger lot single family areas. Traffic flow is also directed towards the more intensive commercial areas. RECOMMENDATION: Based on the findings in Attachment A and B, staff recommends: 1) That the General Plan Land Use Map designation be changed from Moderate Density Single Family to Low Density Multiple Family. 2) That the official zoning ma be changed from RSF-Y to RMF-7 P 9 (PD5) . 3) The zoning text be changed to include the establishment of Planned Development Overlay Zone No. 5 as follows: 9-3. 649 . Establishment of Planned Development Overlay Zone No. 5 (PD5) . The Planned Development Overlay Zone No. 5 is established as shown on the Official Zoning Maps (Sec- tion 9-1. 102) . The following modifications to the develop- ment are established: 4 'b 0 General Plan Amendment 1C-85 (Yeomans/Lindsey) (a) Development shall conform to the approved Summerfield Development Plan. MW:ps ATTACHMENT'A Findings - GP 1C-85 ATTACHMENT B - Findings Zone Change 7-84 ATTACHMENT C - General Plan Designation ATTACHMENT D - Existing 'Zoning Map ATTACHMENT E General Plan Policies ATTACHMENT F - Zoning Excerpt - PD Overlay ATTACHMENT G - Development Plan 5 0 0 General Plan Amendment 1C-85 (Yeomans/Lindsey) ATTACHMENT "A" - General Plan Amendment GP 1C-85 Findings for Approval December 3, 1984 FINDINGS: 1. A General Plan Land Use designation of Low Density Multiple Family is consistent with the policies of the General Plan document. 2. The proposed General Plan Land Use designation is located within the Urban Services Boundary and will not have a significant effect upon the existing level of services. 3. The proposed general plan amendment will not' have a significant adverse effect upon the environment, and preparation of an Environ- mental Impact Report is not necessary. 6 � General Plan Amendment 1C-85 (Yeomans/Lindsey) ATTACHMENT "B" Zone Change 7-84 Findings of Approval S December 3, 1984 FINDINGS: 1. The proposed zone change will amend the zoning map and text to be consistent with the Land Use Map and Text of the General Plan as required by Section 65860 of the California Government Code. 2. The proposed zone change is a logical extension of the existing land use pattern and zoning in the area. 3. The proposed zone change would encourage development which is con- sistent with policies set forth in the Atascadero General Plan. 4. The proposed zone change will not have a significant adverse effect upon the environment, and preparation of an Environmental Impact Report is not necessary. 5. The following findings pertain to the establishment of a Planned Development Overlay Zone ; a. Modification of development standards or processing require- ments is warranted to promote orderly and harmonious ' development. b. Modification of development standards or processing require- ments will enhance the opportunity to best utilize special characteristics of an area and will have a beneficial effect on the area. C. Benefits derived from the overlay zone cannot be reasonably achieved through existing development standards or processing requirements. d. Proposed plans, if any, offer certain redeeming features to compensate for requested modifications. o� wjr . p �o aQ0N�o Fxccwzzm wwco ca �a<r r / \ Z a a coi»c~-i O w F� I w v a \ h►_ • { J t W Q J d U �c) y 2 U W w O_ � ff� i • 0 Q o: w O a I =` p� J a —LL Q U Y U LL wQ !` © J a W _- Jpz J / Xo<u _a O U Q U / ...o-o .. U Cr J N Lli / �/ o- lllJ ��f }—�U lL(nto ........ ... ++F� ff ......ow� . .... / \ \ ....... ... - U U)IL `ti W W O O_ D:Z :: oo C7 C7 E \\ / Z Z �o- 0 %.. Z Z Z ......... .. . ......... .. 1 � � c- W LIJ WWWCO Qd :: ' 'S O�COO — O y 0 CD 0 0 0 0861 I O "-c c c ::�• �.`o-ccc c c / c ' 4 11 G;- n... ..:is .. .•. '�.-.•. f.. e c c� \. �•• •• j) U . C i �i. ii : . . . ... .... ..:.. .::.: : . :.V lir c �•s C-' :J v` Wit. a A' 18 Gj 4 \\dJ LU Js zi J t Z4 -°Ps . d ' 9 S 4 ° 4 R 00 •D' 0 To `` b5 S qP 819 10 ` oti N i/ , e� 5 '. Q' P-� e5855 a55 5 p 054g 851675 N\ sy61}'S s ���,e�♦'6r�" ss .%1Da,L CF o,� � � �gy1 a•'�\'� ,� �� ` E A f tilbi 6-A °ncs w'' ,,y _..(. `a 2..r_� s\,Res - S17E t e:rte ' w 6' �D 5 ' 84 �° EYE. 6 PA 1>6 61 - ♦� GD�D�^�\ �G� Y �yy��f �\ �� �kO u879o�••�(_ Boo G esoo g i y -a ° 'o�, yJ,�"rt,� ,•3 8950 A6$2, p �� a ° ar i e..' SF-1 ze 9 0j°J o f C 9 \ bb S 8900. 4 11h S� 9ozs m --i6---- 4 rtS" a.a .may 1�).' 7•' b '� A 9065 At 91oo ti -T- to '34 W ' '1'9`�1 0 v� J C 9160 A 91z0 COT)-3t L 9135 -' N } P %� CO 7 3879t w 92ss d\ 8 ( $ I o a 15 25 '�+�• - .9 \� '10-A 9soo T !8 26 9275 ,$3' s➢ `roo \ 4 27\ 0 I^/� 9� N `�H AVE rs 15 c \ J�,f Q♦ q G t P. .ye 16sIs s aZC\ P oa rs > 3 8 ! S1 � � ,,p s M 9so& 7 9z25 > ', 9 _-c1-123. 95cp 'J- Jo •c. /'+p 9559 3l) � 10 2A ��a 6 p5 5 31 < RSF�/ 1O �� p`I •°?hse 9 95$ X95 s 4'•, V 130$ - rte•_ 1 �PQ FNos •P f%o,,el r�t�A o •t`u' sc N � Sp -A gO�wos 1 4i` it `� DV gaDO F06 -. Pua ze4�;e 1 4155 c�m m. 'Fr_ lo �£ti a 6 • ,n\S`\.t`� 9"� t �+ \ A 10-Q r i' i , c N\ f 13 • A t0-A RM R ib c AT -aa ° ,. t zoet5 0 r1D' s• ��'6 $D. - p E ��, c � t Sao�@_ . . 'a s+ 9___ __ ♦138 7 .+\ 0 GP IC.-85 ANO z2G 7-84 -feomANSl LINDS,kY C. The Suburban Services Area GENE9AL FLAQPoL-juES The Suburban Services Area consists of the remainder _ of the City and the portion of the Eaglet Tract within e City boundaries. There are 16,539 acres of subd' ided la in this category, excluding the three periphe 1 Agri ulture Preserves. Services to be provided a e similes to the Urban Services Area, except for e exclusion of sewer and drainage. The major water dist button system pr osed in the 1968 General Plan is dequate to serve the p oposed Suburban Services Area. The optimum popula ' on of 33 ,388 people wa established by the Atascadero Advis ry Committee for th Trban Reserve Area. It was developed by u ng the following rocedure: Members of the Atascadero dvisory mmittee inventoried the Urban Reserve Area and eterm' ed that there are 6 ,424 lots zoned for some sort of s ' ential occupancv. Of these 3, 692 were vacant on October 1 1975, at the time of the Special Census by the Adviso mmittee. The lots vary in size from one-fourth acre less o 300 acres . The distri- bution by lot size in ea zoning c tegory--P.-1, R-2 , R-3, R-4 , R-A, A and T--wase etermined fro the Zoning M-ap. This General Plan s pulates that in the rban Services Area no land division eating parcels of less han one-half acre should be allow e except for unusual and co elling reasons . This one-half cre minimum lot size will be p mitted in High Density ingle Family Residential Areas on In the Suburban S vices Area lot sizes should be 22 ac s or greater, generall graded toward larger lots further from t Central Busine District. The egative correction allows for the fact that much o the a eage to the west lies in a region of slope greater tha 0 per cent, shown in Map II-1, and in a region of landsli s, shown in Map II-2. LAND USE POLICY PROPOSALS 1. The entire Atascadero Colony and the Eaglet Tract, less three peripheral agriculture preserves shall constitute the Urban Reserve Area of 20 , 253 acres. Urban and sub- urban development shall be recognized within this area according to appropriate use and density standards. 2. The type and extent of services provided within the Urban Reserve Area shall depend on whether land is in the Urban or the Suburban Services Area. 3. Properties outside the Urban Services Line shall be evalu- ated for lot sizes based on the Suburban Residential range (22 to 10 acres) until sewers are available. 57 . t i • 4 . Large lots are a distinguishing characteristic of rotas cadero. Proposed density standards shall preserve this I feature and thus ensure "elbow room" for _present and future inhabitants. 5. The keeping of domestic animals for pleasure and hobby is common in the community and shall be allowed in sub- urban and urban areas with adequate protection of public health and welfare. 6. High priority is placed upon public and private open space as a land use element. This includes the protec- tion and preservation of scenic areas, watercourses, hazard lands, hilltops, etc. that add much- to the quality of the rural atmosphere in Atascadero. 7. It is an objective of this Plan to strongly support and encourage continuation of the County Agriculture Preserve program. 8. In the calculation of lot area for the purposes of con- sidering land divisions and in determining permitted numbers and types of animals allowed, gross acreage shall be used. However, in determining permitted densities for multiple family residential developments, net acreage (excluding land area needed for streets rights-of-way) shall be used. mom 9 . The Land Use Map of the General Plan is not a specific diagram, especially in areas where there is a transition between different types of land uses , such as residential , adjacent to commercial. Since the transition will occur over a period of time and since it is desirable to pro- tect existing, generally less intensive uses while en- couraging newer, generally more intensive uses , the use of a concept known as the "wavy line" concept may be ap- propriate. This concept will encourage retention of the zoning for the less intensive use until demand dictates a change of zoning for the more intensive use while clearly supporting that future change when the time is appropriate. Factors to consider in the timing of these changes will include existing development, property ownership, devel- opment potential', access and related physical features, and compliance with zoning and General Plan standards and policies. (As an example, an area designated by the Gen- eral Plan for commercial use should be granted consistent zoning when contiguous property in the transition area is under the same ownership and can be developed - in a compat- ible manner; but, when such property., although contiguous , is in another ownership and is developed with a less in- tensive use, such as a residence, or is vacant, zoning may be withheld until the time is right for the more walk intensive commercial use. ) 58 f In much of Atascadero Colony, the original subdivision created lots which are excessively long and narrow, as much as five times longer than wide. Many of these lots are rather small and located in areas destined for urban development. These lots are particularly difficult to maintain in their present form, and taking them down to more usable sizes is sometimes even more difficult. Special studies related to these areas must explore the most practical approach to their highest use, including the need for more stringent standards for re- view of lot splits. Single-Family Residential The existing and future distribution of single-family residen- tial uses can be 'partly interpreted from Table V-1. This table indicates that the largest number of developed single- family lots occurs in Octant NE-1 . This octant also has 424 vacant lots, most of which occur in residential categories. Growth potential, however, is greater in Octants NW-0 and SE-0 . Octant NW-0 has 1, 353 vacant lots principally in low- density residential categories : Four classifications of single-family residential density are proposed in this Plan. The principal uses found in each clas- sification are proposed as follows: Land uses shall be limited to single-family dwellings, acces- sory buildings and uses, home occupations , public parks and playgrounds , schools, libraries and board and care facilities . Minimum lot size for the creation of new lots shall be one- half acre. This is greater than the one-quarter to one-half acre recommended in the 1968 General Plan.. High Density Minimum lot size for the creation of .new lots shall be one-half acre. Moderate Density . Minimum lot size for the creation of new lots within the Urban Services Area shall be one acre if served by sewers and 12 acres if not served by sewers . Low Density Minimum lot sizes within the Urban Services area shall range from 12 to 22 acres while the minimum lot size outside the Urban Services Area shall be 22 acres . Deter- mination of appropriate lot sizes should be based on such factors as slope of access road to the building site; availability of services, especially sewers; distance from the center of the community; general character of neighboring lands; percolation and the area needed for access roads to the building site. _ 59 : - Suburban Sin le-Family Residential Lan se shall be limited to single-family dw ings, acre sso builaings and uses , home occupat ns , truck gardening, hards and vineyards, rest omes, public parks and play unds, animal hospi s (large and small animals} an rseries (pl } Lot sizes shall be 2i acres or more. alley of sizes may be allowed in conjunction with plann residential developments provided that the overa r den ty within the project is consistent with other density`'s andards contained herein. Determination of appropriat of sizes shall be based upon,stich factors as slope of the access road to the bu3ng site, availability of services, dis- tance frim the center of the community, genera harac- ter neighboring lands , percolation and the area eded f access road to building site. Multiple-Family Residential The current distribution of multi-family residential lots is largely confined to the four octants closest to the center of town. These four octants, NE-I , SE-I, NW-I, and SW-I, contain 91 percent of the improved multi-family lots. In keeping with the desired character of the low density residential community, development of each multi- residential area in the future needs to be considered in AO the light of such specific factors as the topography, the traffic circulation, drainage, fire protection and the general level of use intensity at that location. The Multi-Family residential areas shall have the follow- ing density and use characteristics: ` - A minimum lot size of one-half acre providing sewers are available. Smaller lot sizes may-- be allowed in conjunctionwith planned residential developments , in- cluding planned mobile home developments and subdivi- sions , provided that the overall density within the project is consistent with other density standards contained herein. Structures shall be limited to two stories. Other uses compatible with multi-family residential use: parks and playgrounds, accessory buildings and uses, convalescent homes, and mobile home parks . Multi-Family Residential shall be further divided into: i / 60 . High Density % Shall ermitted along arterials and may be per�zt�ed along colle s and local streets and may ude apart- merits of five ori�nbt ing units e maximum allow able density shaled_)X-pdwelling units per acre although lesser densitie specified by zoning based on site char t'6ristics ; exc a density bonus may allow rider certain circumstanc ..where adequate provi s are made to provide housing units a rdable to and moderate income persons . -; Low Density Shall be permitted in areas not adjacent -to arterials and may be permitted adjacent to Single-Family Residential. May include duplexes , triplexes and fourplexes , but generally no more than five dwelling units per building. New projects with more than four units per structure shall require specific design approval. The maximum allowable density shall not exceed ten units per acre although lesser densities may be specified by zoning based on site characteristics ; except, a density bonus may be allowed, under certain circumstances, where ade- quate provisions are made to provide housing units af- fordable to low and moderate income persons . Mobile Home Parks Atas ero, with its rural setting, is ideally suited t e mobile h park. There are currently 10 mobile ho parks in the Colon roviding 448 spaces. Mobile home arks take up 71. 8 acres or . 310 of the Colony' s total ea. Mobile home parks should e d in the future a ey continue to provide an alternative of low c residence. The designations of single-fa nd multiple-family resi- dential will allow mobile me parks a secondary use per- mitted by approval of evelopment plan ased on the loca- tion, character an agnitude of each propo project. Mobile home arks may be permitted in single-family siden- tial ar s at the same densities as if they were stick- ' lt str ures and may be permitted in multiple-family resident' eas as a maximum of 11 dwellings per acre. Residential Policy Proposals 1. It is not in accordance with'Atascadero ' s development policy 'to fill up the core before the lands to the west and south are built upon. 61. G 2. The ideal development pattern that shall be promoted is similar to that conceived by E.G Lewis i .e. , a popula- tion of 20 ,000 to 30 ,000 people living in some 7 ,000 homes scattered over about 23,000 acres of the Colony. Residential densities are proposed which create a devel- opment potential that will reach an ultimate population of about 34, 000 . 3. The residential densities proposed in this Plan space. automati- Cally ensure considerable open 4 High density, residential land uses shall serve as a buffer between commercial and single-family residential areas where appropriate. - - 5 . Residential density shall decrease as one moves outward from the core, in order to maintain the rural atmosphere of the community. This can be accomplished by a graded increase in lot size and a graded decrease in the per- mitted density of population. 6 . Multi-family residential use areas shall have a minimum building site of one-half acre.. Smaller lot sizes may be allowed in conjunction with planned residential dev- elopments, including planned mobile home developments and subdivisions, provided that the overall density within the project is consistent with other density standards Ask contained herein. 7 . Multi-residential density areas shall be considered in light of such specific factors as topography, traffic circulation, drainage fire protection and general level of use intensity at that location. 8 . In keeping with a basic goal to retain the rural atmos- phere of Atascadero, appropriate dens-ties , minimum lot sizes, setbacks and other development standards for dom- estic animal raising shall be established in the Zoning Ordinance. 9. Hazard areas (geologic, land slide, flood, etc. ) shall have appropriate development standards. 10. Lot splits shall be thoroughly evaluated and be in accordance with community plans and principles. Strict adherence to the lot sizes defined in this Plan is essential in order to retain the desired character of the community. Creation of lots smaller than those recommended must not be permitted if the maximum popu- lation of approximately 30, 000 is to be maintained. 62 . 11. Attention shall be paid to the aesthetic result of land division. Building sites shall be encouraged on natural 4P slopes, with minimal disruption of native vegetation and watersheds, and efficient layout of access and utilities . 12. A program shall be developed to encourage the preservation of trees, watersheds and natural slopes and other natural amenities from abuse and destruction resulting from poor design and development practices. 13 . Non-conforming uses located in residential areas shall be relocated. 14 . Where all factors are favorable, exclusive mobile home areas could satisfactorily be developed in designated neighborhood areas . 15. Where all factors are favorable, board and care facil- ities could satisfactorily be developed in designated neighborhood areas. The use density shall not be per- mitted to exceed that of High Density Multiple family use. 16 . New condominium projects, planned mobile home develop- ments and stock cooperatives shall be reviewed on an individual basis as community housing needs , neighbor- hood character, and site improvements will dictate. 17. To alleviate the problems arising from the conversion of existing rental units, the City may regulate con- dominium conversions. The City shall revise its zoning ordinance and subdivision ordinance regarding, condo- minium conversions in order to: (a) Establish criteria for the conversion of existing multiple rental housing to condominiums, community apartments, stock cooperatives, and-'new or limited equity stock cooperatives . (b) Reduce the impact of such conversions on residents in rental housing who may be required to relocate due to conversion of apartments to condominiums , community apartments, stock cooperatives , and new or limited equity stock cooperatives by providing procedures .for notification and adequate time and assistance for such relocation. (c) Insure that the purchasers of converted housing have been properly informed as to the physical condition of the structure which is offered for purchase. (d) Insure that converted housing achieves high quality appearance and safety and is consistent with the goals of the City' s general plan. 63 . a (e) Encourage opportunities for housing ownership of all types, for all levels of income and in a variety of locations. (f) Encourage a continuing supply of rental housing for low and moderate income persons and families. 18. In conjunction with residential project, a density bonus may be allowed, under certain circumstances , where ade- quate provisions are made to provide housing units afford- able to low and moderate income persons . Other bonus incentives, at the discretion of the City, may also be considered in lieu of the density bonus for such projects. COMMERCIAL USES shall berecognizedthat commercial land use represents im rtant segment of the economic base. If commercial dev elop ent is not in scale with the community population, _e publi is inconvenienced, and the community lacks a ke in- gredien of a balanced economy. Atascadero ' s commer ' al problems re common to many cities and include the llowing: TABLE V-1 LAND USE LOT AND BY CTANT ALL LOTS IMPM OVED LOTS BY USE Imp-. _ Sgle _ _... 1>sul-t. Family _ . Other Octant Total roved Vacant am' ly R-2 R-3 R14 Uses NE-I 1, 432 1, 008 4 64 125 - 28 10 198 NE-0 403 307 96 283 0 8 5 11 NE-Q SE-I 903 6 271 389 30 4 153 SE-0 " 732 54 578 132 0 4 18 0 SE-0 SW-I 3 435 148 342 0 43 19 31 ST4-0 407 165 242 159 0 0 0 6 SW-Q NW- 722 424 298 360 17 20 15 12 NW tti'-Q 1, 718 365 1, 353 364 0 0 0 1 TOTALS 6, 900 3, 490 3,410 2, 676 198 133 71 412 ' 64 . . , GP 10-S6 ,4,.+a E-C, -7-S4 YeoMa,4s/ LI�SaY ADOPTED JUNE 27 , 198 z oN rWe, �xe�R.pr- P�ovcRe AY PD (Planned Development) Overlay Zone i 9-3. 641. Purpose: The Planned Development Overlay Zone identi- fies areas where development standards or processing procedures dif- ferent from those established by the underlying zoning district, Chapter 9-4 or Chapter 9-6 , are deemed necessary to promote orderly and harmonious development and to enhance the opportunity to best utilize special characteristics of an area. 9-3 . 642. Aonlicability of Planned Develo2ment Standards: The standards of Section 9-3 . 645 et seq apply to all uses for which a zoning approval is required that are located in a Planned Development Overlay Zone. 9-3 . 643 . Minimum Development Standards and Processing Require- ments: The development standards, special use standards and pro- cessing requirements of the underlying zoning district shall apply in a Planned Development Overlay Zone unless specifically modified, to a greater or lesser extent, by a Planned Development Overlay Zone. The Planned Development Overlay Zone may be used as follows: (a) to modify setbacks; heights; parking and loading; landscap- ing, screening and fencing; signs; streets and frontage im- provements; and, other development and special use standards set forth in Chapters 9-4 and 9-6 and (b) to modify processing procedures set forth by the underlying zoning district (Chapter 9-3) ; and (c) to establish other development standards or processing re- quirements; and (d) to modify minimum lot sizes or permitted density. 9-3 . 644 . Required Findings: In approving the establishment of a Planning Development Overlay Zone, the following findings shall be made: (a) Modification of development standards or processing require- ments is warranted to promote orderly and harmonious development. (b) Modification of development standards or processing require- ments will enhance the opportunity to best utilize special characteristics of an area and will have a beneficial effect on the area. 3-59 Z ADOPTED JUNE 27, I9 • (c) Benefits derived from the overlay zone cannot be reasonably achieved through existing development standards or processing requirements. (d) Proposed plans, if any, offer certain redeeming features to compensate for requested modifications. 9-3. 645. Establishment of Planned Development Overlay Zone No. l PD1. Planned Development Overlay Zone No. 1 is established as shown on the Official Zoning Maps (Section 9-1.102) . The following modifi- cations to development standards and processing requirements are established: (a) A Master Plan of Development shall be approved prior to� ap- proving a Plot Plan, Precise Plan, Conditional Use Permit, or Tentative Parcel or Tract Map. The master Plan of Devel- opment shall be applied for and processed in the manner pre- scribed for a Conditional Use Permit (Section 9-2.109) . (b) In approving a Master Plan of Development, the level of pro- cessing for subsequent projects or phases may be reduced to a Plot Plan provided that the Master Plan contains sufficient detail to support such a determination. (c) No .subsequent Plot Plan, Precise Plan, Conditional Use Per- mit, or Tentative Parcel or Tract Map shall be approved unless found to be consistent with the approved Master Plan of Development. Any amendment to a Master Plan of Develop ment, including conditions thereof, shall be accomplished as set forth in Subsection (a) of this Section. (d) A minimum front setback of twenty (20) feet shall be provided along the El Camino Real frontage of all parcels. Rear set- backs shall be a minimum of ten feet. (e) Plans shall make provision to develop an attractive appear- ance along Highway 101 through the use of landscaping, building and parking orientation and other means. -(f) The number of driveways along El Camino Real shall be mini- mized to prevent potential traffic conflicts. (g) All utilities shall be installed underground. (h) Exterior building materials shall be reviewed for accepta- bility and shall exhibit compatible relationships between buildings on a particular site or parcel. 9-3. 646 . Establishment of Planned Development Overlay Zone No. 2 PD2. Planned Development Overlay Zone No. 2 is established as shown on the Official Zoning Maps (Section 9-1.102) . The following modifi- cations to development standards are established: 3-60 C � V�jOP" e j Q t L, 0 A onQ V V 00 To � vx �z • { r i . 6 Q _ Q � { h _ t -.14 � J t V 6C /7 V✓ ' y ✓ s+ 1 r h � ILr7' 3 t rr f � on, 77 'T ''x z. � k3 y. •,'. �r r a u il i 1 { � - C i a ;b 0 ce rn 0 0Al i d x t , ❑ d 0 'z4 ' ,g -~ � 0 op O O z ..,w_..,..a;e.�4_.....�..�.e ,�,...��s.v.-.n.�:�,k_, ,.,.::;..�sw::,..:.`r:�.,. .: w:,:z:=:.3;.":,,aa.� Ht�:'z- ..�. _-,.»•. ..-..._ >a .�5;,� � - Rr'�..r-s Q. L _1 LI iLL dM 4 ttr=3 52 o } 14 a o �' hH 0 � w at 77 rr t- IT' - W � a co o � 0 g �C no f { no - Oo O ter-- o k f 1 L• L n� o JL�L�i 0 oOR on o a Q � d ISI es' - E,,., .,y«i.. .. ..,..ir.,-....«+..1:.w«. ...us.-Y.-'..;> ,.a.,•.�-;,.:as�4.aw�.e.�wtse,6.. �s:-a..w: «....v��..-.,....,_.<-+...e. ,..:.^<. ..,.r«ea.a... ..-. .r. ... .. _ P A g VV ao ou m I go 1 _ P n! t7 Ut/ Q V O W W 33 3 ._•.-.,_.�,...., ...aw..� .,r...a ,,:.:..2..x..�.:.c^n...a.6Ctr::ti: �w.r...'.wia.+.w.......�.;.+«._.x...v.�,.ui'i.'i....�.r,.:'�:..:.�:.s+.. aw .n,...'a ...wS'.',:�... ..,. .. .. .. _ L ,K � 9 Q � O O 0. .i \� a� 9 OL j s 4>= w tjr 04 urza `� � ftu e3 � oj 4� L-J k O Ol9 � . 1 o a -.- s�..,..,..xre r.. ss.....•w_ri.. ..._..,.•i+...m,...war ... � ,..3 ri?a,�- ..._a-�.. +. . ... .,...,.. _ .. _ .. ... _ .. 4 "'�. b r W n (tfL-y 9�3nn W UO Y oo © ® © ® o ® � ocf � Q r --.. ..�wS..eSaar ..e ......-.<�-a-..+.L.*.e.-....+ro...Y-e...�w+ra.YitM^=sieN�.;b.'.'.^t.i% <�u.n.'+F. r1ncJ.�i..-.... t.ue4 an..b t...w-u.v-a ._ � 3'.' ukN- �._..r::-o+.-. ':✓ *.�' s VV O U V Q 3 v7 lUL ar # - � 0 e m e e " a J�-_ SIERRA CLUB SANTA LUCIA CHAPTER IN IgG1 985 Palm Street, San Luis .Obispo, CA 93401 , IOVN OtO December 17, 1984 Planning Commissioners City of Atascadero 6500 Palma Avenue Atascadero, CA 93422 Re: Summerfield Development Dear Commissioners; At the request of residents near the proposed Summerfield project on El Centro Avenue, the Sierra Club, Santa Lucia Chapter, has reviewed the planned zoning change and development application for this project. The following concerns are expressed following our review. First, the zoning change request to multi-family from single family would drastically increase the density from four homes to thirty homes, a seven fold intensification. Since only three acres of the 4.29 acre site is buildable, 60'x60' lots would be required to accomodate the thirty houses, contrasting greatly with the 50'x180' lots in the area. The proposed project would be in sharp contrast to the neighborhood and out of character with the general rural , large lot tradition of Atascadero. The project would be a questionable precedent for "tract home" construction in areas unsuited for such projects. Indeed, we understand that there are areas in the city zoned suitably for just such projects. Second, project plans call for the removal of from 50% to 66% of the mature oak trees on the property. This, too, seems out of character for a city that prides itself on its oak woodlands, even including the tree , in its city logo. For any trees removed, proper mitigation should include an at least two for one replacement program. A mini neighborhood park preserving some of the oak trees is another alternative mitigation. A recent, survey for the city of San Diego reported that the value of such open space is at least 9% added to the surrounding commercial and residential urban parcels. Third, the project plans to change the natural stream flow across the back of the property, raising questions about on-site drainage, street drainage, and downstream flooding issues. The increased impervious surfaces needed for thirty homes will accelerate flooding off-site. Is the retention basin sized to accomodate 100 year storm flows? Mitigation measures should include the use of permeable surfaces where possible and the retention of a larger open space in the swale area near E1 Dorado Avenue. Fourth, the project will certainly increase neighborhood traffic since planners usually calculate ten trips per day per housing unit. Access to and from E1 Camino Real will be made more difficult by these 300 trips, especially at peak hour travel . The project proposal needs to research the traffic impact with a traffic analysis, including cummulative impacts and possible mitigation measures, such as traffic signals at Santa Rosa Road and by Lucky's Market. 100.RECYCLED PAVER To explore, enjoy, and protect.the nation's scenic resources . . . • (`/ Pape 2: Sierra Club letter re: Sum-nerfield Development • Fifth, the project would significantly impact local public services, such-as schools, police, fire, and water. How will the already over-crowded schools take in another 60 students from this project? Will another fire station be needed to cover the building going on in south Atascadero? The applicant does not address these issues and offers no contributions towards resolving them. In summary, our Chapter believes that the Summerfield project needs a focused EIR, or at least an expanded initial study, looking at density, traffic, drainage, tree protection, and public services. The Chapter recommends that the area be considered for development in keeping with the one unit per acre density assigned to it during the city's recent general plan hearings. This would be most in keeping with the neighborhood while avoiding land use conflicts . Sincerely, Frank Bush Chairperson Santa Lucia Chapter, Sierra Club \' I Page 1 of 6 pages*' 6 November 1984 • We , the undersigned, being residents of the area bounded by Cascada, La Linia, Arcade, and E1 Dorado streets in the City of Atascadero are opposed to the rezoning of Lot 24 of Block 4 known as 8855 ti Centro , Ulty of =ascadero , from RSF-Y, Moderate Density Single Family Residential to RMF (6) (PD) Low Density Multiple Family Residential. we are also opposed to any change in the General Flan relating to this project. NAME �� ADDRESS ' 1. �? �� (Altvi � 4. G7 5 . 7t� - $ 9. 10. 11. 12. 13 . 14. �6��C] Vic: T)C r(-Ilt l) koo 15. r .,� � ' *b nis► hD, -- 17. 19. .crt 20 i s y Yage 2 of 6 pages 26 november );9134 We , the undersigned, being residents of the area bounded by Cascada, La Linia, Arcade , and E1 Dorado streets in the City of Atascadero are oea to_ the ------2-Z- of Lot 24 of Block 4 known as 8855 E1 Centro , City of Atascadero , from RSF-Y , Moderate Density Single Family Residential to RMF (6) (PD) Low Density ::ultiple Family Residential. We are also opposed to any change in the ueneral clan relating to this project. !JAMIE AADRESS 1. "-7 , ? r 5. szA5-7 J40Rt 6. 90 - 10. 1 '24: 12. 13 . 15. P 16. 17Al l 19. • P grag e 3 of 6 a esto, 26 November 1984 r' We , the undersigned, being residents of the area bounded by Cascada, La Linia, Arcade, and El Dorado streets in the City of Atascadero are opposed to the rezoning of Lot 24 of Block 4 known as 8855 EI—t-entro , City of Atascadero , from RSF-Y , Moderate Density Single Family Residential to RMF (6) (FD) Low Density i+:uitiple Family Residential. We are also opposed to any change in the General Plan relating to this project. NA6IE A:IDRESS 1. © ' 4. 4 9 5. _. 7 > � 8. y2�� 9. 13 . r" U, 14 . �� v �� Jam[ 16 44� 17. ;;,dxA 1 ' 1-2o�p — ww� 20 J/ � 4�. 26 November 1984 Yage 4 Uf 6 pages We the undersigned, being residents of the area bounded by Cascada, -La Linia, Arcade, and El Dorado strep:.-ts in the City of Atascadero are opposed to the rezoning of Lot 24 of Block 4 known as 8855 E1 Centro, City of Atascadero , from RSF-Y , Moderate Density Single Family Residential to RMF (6) (PD) Low Density ki'ultiple Family Residential. We are also opposed to any change in the General Plan relating to this project. NAME ADDRESS 1. G C' 2 '7 o4RCAt o 6 . 7.3 9 . 7 8. 12. — —V ' --7- 1 14 . 15 . 16. 17. 1`3 10. 20. • rage 5 Of 6 pagd1b�'i , 26 November 1944 We, the undersigned, being residents of the area bounded by Cascada, La Linia, Arcade , and El Dorado struts in the City of Atascadero a_ oppgAgd to the rezoning of Lot 24 of Block 4 known as 8855 E1 Centro , City of Atascadero , from RSF-Y , Moderate Density Single Family Residential to KMF (6) (PD) Low Density Wultiple Family Residential. We are also opposed to any change in the General Plan relating to this project. NAME ADDRESS 4 6 .V 7 8. 9 . 90 5:3 LA 10. 12 . 13 . 14 -1/ -y 1 . 17. 1� . 20. • rage 6 Of 6 page ti 26 november 1984 We , the undersigned, being residents of the area bounded by Cascada, La Linia, Arcade , and El Dorado streets in the City of Atascadero are opposed to the rezoning of Lot 24 of Block 4 known as 8855 El Centro , City of Atascadero , from RSF-Y , Moderate Density Single Family Residential to RMF (6) (PD) Low Density Multiple Family Residential. we are also opposed to any change in the ueneral Plan relating to this project. NAPIE ADDRESS 1. 2 . 4. ct t 5. 6 . 7. _ 8. /� J 9. 10. 11. 12. 13 , 14 . 15 . 16 . 17. 10. 20. �i RESOLUTION NO. 10-84 A RESOLUTION OF THE ATASCADERO PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNA- TION AT 8800 EL CENTRO FROM MODERATE DENSITY SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO LOW DENSITY MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (GP 1C-85 : YEOMANS) WHEREAS, the Atascadero Planning Commission conducted public hearings on the subject matter on December 3 and 17, 1984; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65323 provides that a general pian be amended by the adoption of a resolution; and WHEREAS, the Atascadero Planning Commission, on a 3:3 vote, considered the following findings which results in a technical recommendation not to make the following findings: 1. A General Plan Land Use designation of Low Density Multiple Family is consistent with the policies of the General Plan document. 2. The proposed General Plan Land Use designation is located within the Urban Services Boundary and will not have a significant effect upon the existing level of services. 3. The proposed General Plan amendment will not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment, and preparation of an Envir- onmental Impact Report is not necessary. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Atascadero Planning Commission does hereby recommend denial of General Plan Amendment GP IC-85 (Yeo- mans) changing the 1980 Atascadero General Plan Land Use Map as shown on the attached Exhibit "A" . On motion by Commissioner LaPrade and seconded by Commissioner Lilley, ' the foregoing resolution is adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES : Commissioners LaPrade, Lilley, and Wentzel NOES: Commissioenrs Carroll, Sherer and Chairman Summers ABSENT: Commissioner Moore' DATE ADOPTED: December 17, 1984 2 IR EY SU RS; Chairman ATTEST: HENRY ENG 'N, Plaiaing Director APPROVED AS TO FORM: ALLEN GRIMES, City Attorney OW Luz V��O ` �\ ♦/ �/ W.W 2 Zm WW JQ Q Jm mr Z QQ U�Wit,) -J \� Q - 1 ti w !�f z w O �"'{ D w a 1 �} W O W 'di N v WCL...... ...... x a . .......... . . . .......... . 4 w :: t•...� e� FSI Z n _. �Waw�� _ < j¢�vu.cncn :�< H qr-two» '/ \\ \ !�•' `�\ -©c-.. p� LLL u LL Lal. . � o o-©.o'er j Z Lo ZZ Z z �• f r H En \ �' r (n uj as e �jcic ooq�o4o Z W Z \ { : . � o c W WWWCO ' \ DJ - (2OS2OO» 2 J S 2:J to Q. �... ::::::: maj J < �Y : �r 1 I r Q• i' c J . \f ::\•. ": .::�=... . :::. �::-:�.; -.. �.- ... !- _ loo Q�<,`. _ c ee \ `. •:::::::.' .._-�, ...�.- .'"} �: i c. Ll... .... �itti.'. c+oc-aco��c�•ccc� .. _.. � RESOLUTION NO. 11-85 RESOLUTION OF THE ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP CHANGING THE LAND USE- DESIGNATION- AT 8800 EL CENTRO FROM MODERATE DENSITY SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO LOW DENSITY MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (GP 1C-85: YEOMANS) WHEREAS, a request to amend the City of Atascadero' s General plan has been received as follows: General Pian Amendment 1C-85 : Request submitted by Michael Yeomans and Joseph Lindsey to change the General Plan Land Use Element Map designation from Moderate Density Single Family Residential to Low Density Multiple Family Residential. Subject property is located at 8800 El Centro, also known as Lot 24 of Block 4. Negative Declaration to the provisions of CEQA is to be certified. WHEREAS, this request was considered by the Planning Commission at hearings held on December 3 and 17, 1984 with the Commission voting 3:3 on a motion to recommend approval with the result being a techni- cal recommendation for denial; and WHEREAS, such amendment to the General Plan was considered b the City Y Council during a public hearing; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65323 provides that a General Plan be amended by the adoption of a resolution; and WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Atascadero finds as follows: 1. A General Plan Land Use designation of Low Density Multiple Family is consistent with the policies of the General Plan document. 2. The proposed General Plan Land Use designation is located within the Urban Services Boundary and will not have a significant effect upon the existing level of services. 3. The proposed general plan amendment will not have a significant adverse effect upon the environment, and preparation of an Envir- onmental Impact Report is not necessary. NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Atascadero does resolve to approve General Plan Amendment GP 1C-85 (Yeomans) as shown on the at- tached Exhibit "A" . On motion by and seconded by , the amendment was approved by the following roll call vote: AYES: �J NOES: . ABSENT: DATE ADOPTED: CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA By: ROLFE D. NELSON, Mayor ATTEST: ROBERT M. JONES, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO` FORM: ALLEN GRIMES, City Attorney • 2 �� i \ _ / \ f a�Uf>cr LL� 0 - W W—j<< F Jmm MIX a o a _ w wZw I p w � o H w_ (t�w I < W a I Q O a i 1 i rA G� a •���ww / H vwQ�,�ow a - U ............. �::' • A ova (nMEL -�WQw�� i ...... :::.. a >Q��tL OC w wwooMIX 6 r \ `± Q ti Q Q Lal IaL �{- J XXOZZZ :. \ : r o00 0 © Z ZZZQ I :C � w-W W W co O 0O�O�D : TJS�Jtna r r JooJh� . . ... ........... PO 777, I �C ..... ...... . ....:.. . ..... ...... r - F o— j.. - "c o � •� e• o � o 0 .::i, iii:oo +oma c c • 0 RESOLUTION NO. 12-85 RESOLUTION OF THE ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL DENYING AN AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP CHANGING THE LAND USE DESIGNATION AT 8800 EL CENTRO FROM MODERATE DENSITY SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO LOW DENSITY MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (GP 1C-85 : YEOMANS) WHEREAS, a request to amend the City of Atascadero's General plan has been received as fol-lows: General Plan Amendment 1C-85: Request submitted by Michael Yeomans and Joseph Lindsey to change the General Plan Land Use Element Map designation from Moderate Density Single Family Residential to Low Density Multiple Family Residential. Subject property is located at 8800 El Centro, also known as Lot 24 of Block 4. Negative Declaration to the provisions of CEQA is to be certified. WHEREAS, this request was considered by the Planning Commission at hearings held on December 3 and 17, 1984 with the Commission voting 3:3 on a motion to recommend approval with the result being a techni- cal recommendation for denial; and WHEREAS, such amendment to the General Plan was considered by the City Council during a public hearing; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65323 provides that a General Plan be amended by the adoption of a resolution; and WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Atascadero finds as follows: 1. A General Plan Land Use designation of Low Density Multiple Family is not consistent with the policies of the General Plan document. 2. The proposed General Plan Land Use designation is located within the Urban Services Boundary and will have a significant effect upon the existing level of services. 3. The proposed general plan amendment will not have a significant adverse effect upon the environment, and preparation of an Envir- onmental Impact Report is not necessary. NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Atascadero does resolve to deny General Plan Amendment GP 1C-85 (Yeomans) as shown on the at- tached Exhibit "A" . On motion by and seconded by , the amendment was approved by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: DATE ADOPTED: CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA By: ROLFE D. NELSON, Mayor ATTEST: ROBERT M. JONES, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ALLEN GRIMES, City Attorney Zw 1 ♦ Y Q, W a v V�W 0 I .. .. O U1>W" / O \ 1. ¢ an Q owwz • Q •- O LL U LLIZZM WW JQ Q> J["t Q QQ V7 jU. "V W U I { p0W , 1 H MWa (/) �U W C7 WCL I �} �• I t jLL i:. :::'. Cr aw O J� O U— Q Q w<W�F t c �/ jQ2w : 0LOL s /\ = c �� / WWOCLCrO� ' // 'J• `\ [jam [� ti T ' < V� TXL)LTCLZz o` o < t aQ< / _ J as LL LL LL LL � J ^ ' � i�iiccciicc•:: � � J J�J J J oa4 OOZZZZ ............ eQca � c } . y� a�QAoo wW W W W Co 4OOOQO�U a .. 3 co _ o 05 5 0861 4.• ....... ... 1 :!�•. I 1. \ 2 ............ �` c G c+ c }G SCG CGGC<.-�C VGG Gam. �UNCIL MEETING: 2/25/85 AGENDA ITEM NO, : B - 2 • M E M O R A N D U M TO: City Council February 25, 1985 VIA: Ralph H. Dowell, Jr. , Acting City Manager FROM: Henry Engen, Planning Director RE: ZONE CHANGE 1-85 Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment relative to modifying the rear setback requirement in commercial and indus trial zones which are adjacent to residential zones, to allow waiving the ten foot setback for buildings, or portions of buildings 12 feet in height or less in said area. (Initiated by Planning Commission) BACKGROUND: The zoning text amendment was initiated by the Planning Commission to clarify the zoning ordinance to permit the waiver of ' ten foot rear yard setbacks where commercial and industrial property abuts residen- tial property. A hearing was held February 4, 1985 and considered the attached staff report. Ed Chidlaw, on behalf of Joe Babcock, spoke against the concept of waiving setbacks and the specifics of the amendment proposed. The Planning Commission action was to recommend amendment of the ordinance per the attached draft zoning text amendment. RECOMMENDATION Adoption of the attached Ordinance. HENRY EN EN TJ PH D WE L, JR. Planning Director Acting City Manager ENCLOSURES: Draft Zoning Text Amendment Ordinance February 4, 1985 Planning Commission Staff Report ORDINANCE NO. 98 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT RELATIVE TO ENABLING WAIVER OF THE TEN FOOT SETBACK REQUIREMENT IN COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL ZONES ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL ZONES WHEREAS, the proposed zoning ordinance amendment proposes standards consistent with the General Plan as required by Section 65860 of the California Government Code; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendment is in conformance with Section 65800 et seq. of the California Government Code concerning zoning regula- tions; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendment will not have a significant adverse effect upon the environment and preparation of an Environmental Impact Report is not necessary; and WHEREAS, Atascadero Planning Commission has held a public hearing and has recommended approval of Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment 1-85. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Atascadero does ordain. as follows• Section 1. Council Findings. 1. The proposed revision will not have a detrimental effect upon the community' s health, safety and welfare. 2. The proposed revision is consistent with City ordinances and the General Plan. 3. The proposed revision expresses the intent of the Planning Depart- ment and of the City regarding waiver of rear setback requirements in commercial and industrial zones which are adjacent to residen- tial zones. 4. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, the Negative Declaration granted the project by the Planning" Commission is appropriate. Section 2. Zoning Text Change: Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment-1-85 is approved to change the text of Section 9-4.108 (b) (2) to read as follows: Section 9-4.108 (b) (2) . Adjacent to Residential Use Zone: "Where the rear property line abuts a residential zone or use, no rear setback is required for buildings or portions of buildings which do not exceed 12 feet in height within ten feet of the rear property line. The rear setback shall be a minimum of ten feet for buildings or portions of buildings which exceed 12 feet in height. " Section 3. Publication. The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published once, within fifteen (15) days after its passage in the Atascadero News, a news- paper of general circulation, printed, published and circulated in this City in accordance with Government Code Section 36933; shall cer- tify the adoption of this ordinance; and shall cause this ordinance and its certification to be entered in the Book of Ordinances of this City. Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall go into effect and be in full force and effect at 12 :01 a.m. on the thirty-first (31st) day after its passage. The foregoing ordinance was introduced on February 25, 1985 and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ROLFE D. NELSON, Mayor ATTEST: ROBERT M. JONES, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: RALPH H. D WELL, JR. , Acting City Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: ALLEN GRIMES, City Attorney . City of Atascadero Item: B-4 STAFF REPORT FOR: City Planning Commission Meeting Date: 2/4/85 BY: Doug Davidson, Associate Trainee File: ZC 1-85 APPLICANT: Initiated by Planning Commission SUBJECT: A A zoning text revision modifying the rear setback requirement in com- mercial and industrial zones which are adjacent to residential zones, to allow waiving the ten foot setback for buildings, or portions of buildings, twelve feet in height or less. the Planning Director has prepared a draft Negative Declaration indicating the project will not have a significant adverse effect upon the environment. A Notice of public hearing was published in the Atascadero News on January 25, 1985. BACKGROUND: • This text change of the zoning ordinance involves Section 9-4. 108 (b} (2) which applies to all commercial and industrial zones, and reads as follows: (2) Adjacent to Residential Use Zone: "Where the rear property line abuts a residential zone or use, no rear setback is required for buildings which do not exceed twelve (12) feet in height. The rear setback shall be a minimum of ten feet for buildings which exceed twelve (12) feet in height. " The intent of this section was to allow buildings or portions of buildings to be twelve (12) feet in height or less within the ten (10) foot setback line. Any buildings or portion of buildings greater than twelve (12) feet in height would require a ten foot setback. Staff applied this reasoning to the Kleinhammer project on Morro Road and the Don Messer commercial structure at 7425-45 E1 Camino Real. This interpretation was appealed, specifically in Precise Plan 47-84 (Don Messer , 7425-45 E1 Camino Real) at the Planning Commission meeting of January 21, 1985. At that meeting the Commission voted in favor of the appeal because the wording of the ordinance did not express this intent. The building in question was 19 feet in height, although the portion of it within the 10 foot setback was 12 feet in height. The Planning Commission directed staff to develop revised wording to allow for this situation. Zone Change 1-85 FINDINGS: 1. The proposed revision will not have a detrimental effect upon the community' s health, safety, and welfare. 2. The proposed revision is consistent with city ordinances and the General Plan. 3. The proposed revision will express the intent of the Planning De- partment and Planning Commission regarding waiver of rear setback requirements in commercial and industrial zones which are adjacent to residential zones. RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the above findings, the Planning Department recommends as follows: 1. Issuance of a Negative Declaration; and 2. Approval of Zone Change 1-85 as follows: a. Revise the wording of Section 9-4.108 (b) (2) to read as follows (CAPS REFLECT NEW LANGUAGE) : " (2) Adjacent to Residential Use Zone: Where the rear property line abuts a residential zone or use, no rear setback is required for buildings OR PORTIONS OF BUILDINGS which do not exceed twelve (12) feet in height. The rear setback shall be a minimum of ten (10) feet for buildings OR PORTIONS OF BUILDINGS which exceed twelve (12) feet in height. " - DGD:ps ATTACHMENT: Exhibit A - Visual Representation of the Ordinance' s Intent 2 c^, i Z 0 o f r 1� t ,fes a� i • W Z 'DOZ 7)(J OZONV493 M CIS( GMV <M f a21 z 16 JI En- it 1 R f i i COUNCIL MEETING: 2/25/85 AGENDA ITEM NO. C 2 • TO: City Council February 25, 1985 FROM: Ralph H. Dowell, Jr.--JZ Acting City Manager SUBJECT: POLICE FACILITY RECOMMENDATIONS Attached is a memorandum from Chief Mc Hale, Chairman of the Police Facility Committee, with related Resolution No. 13-85 and a memorandum from the Consulting City Engineer addressing the evaluation of the Masonic Building. The basic recommendation of the Police Facility Committee is that we proceed with the purchase of a temporary modular building of specific size and design to conduct present and near future police facility • operations and locate same on existing City owned land. The Committee also recommends that a Police Facility Fund be established by ord- inance with a designated amount of funds to be deposited each fiscal year. I see no difficulty in establishing such fund by ordinance, but sug- gest withholding a specified dollar amount until such time as the total cost of the modular facilty is known and we have theopportunity to review funding for fiscal year 1985/86. An example of my concern in 1985-86 is the possibility of losing Federal Revenue Sharing monies. In reference to the memorandum from Consulting Engineer John Wallace addressing the Masonic Building, I concur with his recommendation that we not expend any funds unless we positively plan to make use of the facility. I concur that if we anticipate any usage of this building as a public facility that we must conduct proper engineering eval- uation and address any recommended structuai repair. RHD• kv • M E M O R A N D U M TO: Acting City Manager FROM: Consulting City Engineer SUBJECT: City Evaluation of Masonic Building for Possible Use as a Public Facility DATE: February 20, 1985 In early January I discussed with the Masonic organization the possibility of using the Masonic building located on Olmeda Avenue as a public facility. Previously I had walked through the structure with Police Chief Bud McHale in order to review its general con- dition. Subsequently I also discussed the structure with Larry McPherson, the previous Director of Public Works. Later in January I walked through the building with a structural engineer and a materials testing engineer in order for them to give the City a proposal for a structural evaluation and recommend remedial measures. We were also able to obtain some plans of the original • building from the Masons which proved to be very helpful in the engineer's evaluation for the purposes of providing the city with a proposal. As I reported verbally at the City Council meeting on February 12, the cost of the engineer's evaluation report would be between $5500 and $7000. The City Council at that meeting directed us to consider the matter further and to provide a written recommendation for the meeting on February 25th. Therefore it is my recommendation that: either the City fund the evaluation study if it is the City's intention to consider acquiring the use of this building as a public facility, or 2) if the City does not wish to fund the study that it so notify the Masonic organization that the City is no longer interested in pursuing discussions with them for the use of the building. After the City Council considers this action I will inform the Masonic Organization of the City's decision in writing. I JOHN WALLACE M E M O R A N D U M TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: POLICE FACILITY COMMITTEE - BUD McHALE, CHAIRMAN SUBJECT: FINAL RECOMMENDATION POLICE FACILITY DATE: JANUARY 31, 1985 The Police Facility Committee met Thursday, 1-31-85 for the purpose of reviewing current alternatives under consideration. A brief discussion ensued regarding the feasibility of utilizing the Masonic Building as a P.D. While the consensus of the Committee is not in favor of this alternative, I reported that the Council has asked for a structural and seismic engineer- ing analysis of the Masonic Building by an outside firm. There was considerable discussion about other options previously considered and our Committee focussed upon one in particular which, in light of all factors weighed, now seems most appropriate to our circumstances. The Committee ' s official , unanimous recommendation is: 1. Purchase or lease a temporary modular building of sufficient size and design to accommodate present and near future police operations and locate same on existing City-owned land. 2 . Establish a designated police facility fund to which an established ($80,000 ?) would be added at the beginning of each fiscal year. Enact an ordinance which would preclude the use of any part of the fund for anything but its specifically designated intent except by a Council four-fifths vote and in case of an actual emergency. Committee believes that the following benefits may be derived from this direction: 1. An immediate resolution of the police facility issue is seen. 2 . A relatively inexpensive option. Example: A used unit of 7 , 292 square feet is now available at $25. 95 per square foot - basic cost $189 ,227 + site proparation including paving, fencing, etc. (New modulars cost approximately $40. 00 per square foot. ) 3. The modular unit may be resold in the future for approxi- mately 50% of the purchase price; or the City could use it for another application. • V 4 . The modular can be designed and modified comparatively easy for a custom use which is in contrast to attempting • to "mare-do" with an old, remodeled (and expensive) existing structure. Following discussion regarding the modules, I reiterated our Council ' s appreciation to our Committee for the many volunteer hours dedicated to the task of finding a home for the P.D. I also announced that Council has "released" the Committee from further responsibility for this project, and that as such, there will be no further meetings. RICHARD H. McHALE RHM: sb i RESOLUTION NO. 13 - 85 RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO TO REQUEST BID PROPOSALS FOR THE PURCHASE OF MODULAR BUILDINGS TO BE USED AS A POLICE FACILITY ANDTO ESTABLISH A DESIGNATED POLICE FACILITY BUILDING FUND. WHEREAS, it is the desire of Council to provide an adequate and immediate solution to the housing need of City Police operations; and WHEREAS, there is not sufficient funding at this time to construct a permanent police facility of appropriate size and design; and WHEREAS, it the Council ' s desire to establish a Police Facility Building Fund with a goal of building a permanent facility in 1991; NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Atascadero as follows: Section 1 : City shall request bid proposals for the purchase of portable, modular office space of sufficient size and design to house City Police Operations through "the year 1991. Such requests shall solicit proposals for both new and used units which must allow for appropriate design flexibility. Section 2: City shall establish a discrete, designated Police Facility Building Account/Fund with an initial deposit of a minimum of $100, 000 . 00 to which a minimum of $80, 000.00 would be added each July. Section 3 : Expenditure of funds from this discrete account for anything but its designated use may only be authorized by a Council four-fifths roll call vote and in case of an actual emergency. Upon motion by Councilman , seconded by Councilman and on the following roll call vote, to-wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ADOPTED: February 25 , 1985 L Q"" ROLFE NELSON, Mayor ATTEST: ROBERT M. JONES, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ALLEN GRIMES, City Attorney APPROVED AS TO CONTENT RALPH H. DOWELL, Jr. , Acting City Manager 1 &UNCI L MFFTI NG: 2/25/85 AGFNDA ITEM NO, C 3 • M E M O R A N D U M TO: City Council February 25, 1985 VIA: Ralph H. Dowell, Jr. , Acting City Manager FROM: Henry Engen, Planning Director RE: General Plan Amendment 1B-85, 1875 El Camino Real (H.L.S. Properties/Associated Professions) Draft Resolution of Approval BACKGROUND At your meeting of February 12th, the Council approved this requested General Plan map change and directed staff to bring back a resolution approving the request. ACTION REQUESTED Approval of the attached draft resolution (reflecting the vote of the City Council at the February 12th hearing) . HENRY E GEN RALPH H. DOWELL, JR. Planning Director Acting City Manager HE:ps Enclosure: Draft Resolution 3 / g�� t • • RESOLUTION NO. 14-85 A RESOLUTION OF THE ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP CHANGING THE LAND USE DESIGNATION AT 1875 EL CAMINO REAL FROM SINGLE FAMILY SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL TO RETAIL COMMERCIAL (NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL) (GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 1B-85, H.L.S. PROPERTIES, LTD. ) WHEREAS, a request to amend the City of Atascadero General Plan has been received as follows: General Plan Amendment 1B-85: Request submitted by H.L.S. Properties, Ltd. (Associated Professions, Inc. ) to change the General Plan Land Use Element Map designation from Suburban Single Family Residential to Retail Commercial (Neighborhood Commercial. Subject property is located at 1875 E1 "Camino Real, also known as Lot 31 of Block 49. Negative Declaration to the provi- sions of CEQA is to be certified WHEREAS, this request was considered by the Planning Commission at a hearing held on December 3, 19084 and was recommended for denial; and WHEREAS, such amendment to the General Planwasconsidered by the City Council during a public hearing; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65323 provides that a General Plan be amended by the adoption of a resolution; and WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Atascadero finds as follows: 1. A General Plan Land Use designation of Retail Commercial (Neigh- borhood Commercial) is consistent with the policies of the General Plan document by completing the squaring off of the four corners of El Camino Real and Dei Rio Roads intended to ultimately be devoted to Neighborhood Commercial usage. 2. The proposed General Plan amendment will not have a significant adverse effect upon the environment, and preparation of an Envir- onmental Impact Report is not necessary. NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Atascadero does resolve to approve General Plan Amendment 1B--85 (H.L.S. Properties Ltd. ) to change the 1980 Atascadero General Plan Land Use Map as shown on the attached Exhibit entitled GP 1B-85, 1875 E1 Camino Real. i PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Atascadero, California, held on the- day of , 1985. CITY OF ATASCADERO By ROLFE D. NELSON, Mayor ATTEST: ROBERT M. JONES, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO C ENT: RALPH H. DOWELL, JR. , Acting City Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: ALLEN GRIMES, City Attorney 2 ��{�• Ifl•85 • r' S-76 EL INp FAL Cz (Nr I Z,�l�'7 =Ff Ls� _Gtr1JC�� ;, u , Y= :t - - t • f i t _ E.�. .�• .. �e .. A ` ~ t _ ..... �.... :t . . J �:i 7: L :J f , � O J t �• :c--:::�" ji yam-: . . I d .,� t ?- : . _ J. if .y i� - ` l �` � _ ,"'..� /�'�••�; 'J d- 11 / [: �r • 11kUNCIL MFFTING : 2/25/85 AGFNDA ITFM NO. : C - 4 M E M O R A N D U M TO: City Council February 25, 1985 VIA: Ralph H. Dowell, Jr. , Acting City Manager FROM: Henry Engen, Planning Director Ac RE: Proposed Resolution to Initiate Proceedings for Annexation No. 3 BACKGROUND On February 7th, we received the accompanying material relative to Annexation Area No. 3 which was approved by the Local Agency Formation Commission on December 20 , 1984. Before the area can be annexed to the City, it is required that a resolution be adopted by the City Council establishing a date of public hearing for the proposal not less than 30 days nor more than 45 days after the date of adoption of the resolution initiating these proceedings. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt the accompanying resolution establishing a date of hearing for Annexation No. 3 on April 8 , 1985. It should be noted that the appli- cant has been advised of the need to provide a $480 check payable to the State Board of Equalization following favorable Council action at said hearing. HE:ps Enclosure: Annexation Area Map Draft Resolution No. 15-85 February 4,1985 LAFCO communication • RESOLUTION NO. 15-85 A RESOLUTION OF THE ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL ESTABLISHING A DATE FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. 3 TO THE CITY OF ATASCADERO WHEREAS, the City of Atascadero has amended its General Plan map and prezoned the area described in Annexation No. 3 to the City of Atas- cadero; and WHEREAS, the Local Agency Formation Commission, on December 20 , 1984 approved said annexation as being consistent with its sphere of influ- ence plan; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 35220 et seq. requires that a Resolu- tion initiating procedures for the proposal consistent with LAFCO's resolution shall be adopted and set a date for public hearing not less than 30 days nor more than 45 days after the adoption of said resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Atascadero City Council sets April 8, 1985, the hour of 7:30 p.m. of said date in the Council Chambers of the Administration Building in the City of Atascadero as a time and place for considering the annexation of Annexation No. 3 to the City of Atascadero. CITY OF ATASCADERO By ROLFE D. NELSON, Mayor ATTEST: ROBERT M. JONES, City Clerk APPRO AS TO CO �'�t) 7n - RALPH H. DOWELL, JR. , Acting City Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: ALLEN GRIMES, City Attorney RECEWEO FEB County of San Luis Obispo COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER • SAN LUIS OBISPO CALIFORNIA40 • 93 8 (805)549•501 i OFFICE OF THE February 4 19 8 5 , COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR Mr. Henry En9en Planning Director City of Atascadero P . 0. Box 747 Atascadero , CA 93423 Dear Mr. Engen : Enclosed are copies of LAFCo resolutions 84-41 (Approving Annexation No. 4 to the City of Atasca- dero, Wastewater Treatment Plant ) and 84-43 (Approv- ing Annexation No. 3 to the City of Atascadero-, Holi - day Inn ) . Also enclosed are "Filing Procedure instructions for each annexation . • In the case of Annexation No. 4 (Wastewater Treatment Plant ) , please note that LAFCo has authorized the city to complete the annexation -without public notice , hearing or election. For Annexation No. 3 (Holiday Inn ) , the city is authorized to initiate proceedings to annex the territory as specified in the filing instructions . Following its decisions on the annexations , the city must send certified copies of its resolutions to the LAFCo office . These reso- lutions must be accompanied by the other materials specified in the filing procedures in order to final - ize the annexations . Thank you for your patience in this matter. Please feel free to call if you have any questions . Sincerely , PAUL L. HOOD Deputy Executive Officer Local Agency Formation Commission PLH:mjw (5598u ) 1 rt cnCO / CO a y Z ' CO Z z cn n ; ti� s z -44 Ll�rrHX� SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA. 93408 FILING PROCEDURE Re: Annexation No. 3 to the City of Atascadero (Holiday Inn) At its meeting on December 20, 1984 the Local Agency Formation Commission adopted the enclosed resolution approving the above-referenced proposal subject to the terms and conditions specified in the resolution. Your agency (City, County, or Special District) is the conducting authority responsible for completing subsequent proceed- . ings. Pursuant to Government Code Section 35220 et seq. (56290 et seq. for Special Districts), the conducting authority must take the following actions upon receipt of the Commission's resolution: 1. Adopt a resolution initiating proceedings for the proposal which shall comply with the Commission's resolution and shall r 2. Set a date for public hearing on the proposal which shall not be less than 30 days nor more than 45 days after the date of adoption of the resolution initiating proceedings (not less than 15 days nor more than 60 days for Special Districts). At the public hearing, the conducting authority shall hear and receive ww' yg all oral and written protest. Based upon the amount of written protest _ �� .. ., filed and not withdrawn by resident voters or landowners, the conducting authority shall act to either (a) order the boundary change without election, (b) order the boundary change subject to confirmation by the voters, or (c) deny the boundary change. If your Board/Council adopts an ordinance or resolution ordering a boundary change, the following materials must be sent to the LAFCo office for filing`. 1. Sixtaan certified copies of the ordinance or resolution approving the boundary change. 2. SixtPPn* copies of the legal description of boundaries approved by LAFCo. 3. Sixteen copies of the map showing boundaries of the area approved by LAFCo. 4. The State Board of Equalization fee in the amount of $ 48 .00 made payable to "State Board of Equalization." (If your District is not carried on the regular County Assessment Roll, please indi- cate when submitting documents--no fee is required.) 5. Certificate Re: Terms and Conditions and Indebtedness (if attached). The Executive Officer will check all documents for compliance before making filings with the County Recorder, State Board of Equalization, and County Assessor. Amendments to the LAFCo resolution, including boundary modifications, may be made only by the Commission. If you need more information, please call the LAFCo office at 549-5011. February 1, 1985 Date PAUL L. HOOD Deputy Executive Officer n,. 3/82 * May be included as Part of the resolution IN THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA Thursday, December 20, 1984 PRESENT: Commissioners Jerry Diefenderfer, Ruth Brackett, Melanie Billig, John Brady, and Vice Chairman B'Ann Smith ABSENT: None RESOLUTION NO. 84-43 RESOLUTION MAKING DETERMINATIONS APPROVING THE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF ATASCADERO Y, The following resolution is now offered and read: WHEREAS, on August 24, 1984, there was filed with this Commission a proposal for an annexation of territory to the City of Atascadero; and '4 ; : WHEREAS, the Executive Officer has given the notices z.��- �, _ -ten« required by law and has forwarded copies of his report to officers, persons, and public agencies prescribed by law; and WHEREAS, the matter was duly set for public hearing at 9:00 a.m. on December 20, 1984, and the public hearing was duly conducted and determination and decision made on December 20, ti 1984; and WHEREAS, at said hearing, this Commission heard and received all oral and written protests, objections, and evidence, which were made, presented, or filed, and all persons present were given the opportunity to hear and be heard in respect to any matter relating to said proposal and report; and WHEREAS, the Commission has duly considered the final environmental impact report and addendum certified and approved by the City Council of the City of Atascadero for this project, and has reviewed and considered the information contained therein and all comments received during the public hearing process; and WHEREAS, the Commission has duly considered the proposal and finds that the territory proposed to be annexed is uninhabited, that the distinctive short form designation of the territory proposed to be annexed is "Annexation No. 3 to the City of Atascadero (Holiday Inn)"; that the territory proposed for annexation is located within the sphere of influence of the City of Atascadero; and that the proposed annexation should be approved. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED by the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of San Luis Obispo, State of California, as follows: 1. That the recitals set forth hereinabove are true, correct, and valid. 2. That the legal description approved by this Commission ? is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A", and incorporated by 2 s _ reference herein as though set forth in full. 3. That Annexation No. 3 to the City of Atascadero (Holiday Inn), being further identified in the files of this 0 Commission as file No. 3-R-83, is hereby approved and the City 77 Council of the City of Atascadero is authorized to initiate proceedings to annex such territory. . 4. That the Executive Officer of this Commission is authorized and directed to mail certified copies of this resolution in the manner provided by law. Upon motion of Commissioner Diefenderfer, seconded by Commissioner Brackett, and on the following roll call vote, to wit: AYES: Commissioners DIEFENDERFER, BRACKETT, BILLIG, BRADY, and SMITH NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAINING: None the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted. Vice Chairman of said Local Agency Formation Commission s ATTEST: Deputy Executive Officer Yet, n'l 114 cue�^y. Y —2— APPROVED AS TO FOAND LEGAL EFFECT: JAMES B. LINDHOLM, JR. County Counsel Deputy County Counsel STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss. COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO ) I. William E. Briam, Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of said County and State, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a full, true, and correct copy of the original on file in my office, and that I have carefully compared the same with the original. WITNESS my hand this T day of Fee4Q fly-- 19'95 . WILLIAM E. BRIAM Executive Officer By Deputy Executive Officer 3444r 15 r c LEGAL DESCRIPTION APINEXATION NO. ..3 TO THE CITY OF ATASCADERO That certain property within the County of San Luis Obispo, State of California, being a portion of that property conveyed to Harold L. Edelman by deed recorded in Volume 2043 of Official Records at Page 22 , records of said County, more particulary described as follows: E Beginning at P. R. No. 1 , the Southeast corner of Rancho Paso de Robles in the bed of the Salinas River, as shown on a map of said Rancho recorded in Book A of naps at Page 164 , records of said County, and running thence the following courses and distances, according to said deed to Harold L. Edelman : - 1. Along line of said Rancho North 58035' West, 872 .3 feet to a point opposite the mouth of Paso Robles Creek; thence up said Creek the following courses and distances : South 21° West, 637 .7 feet; South 51° 30 ' West, 380 .0 feet; and South 760301 West, 115 feet, more or less, to the intersection with the northeasterly line of the parcel of land conveyed to the State of California by deed recorded April 25 , 1950 in Volume 562 of Official Records at Page 13 , records of said County, particularly with the course numbered (11) of said deed, being the northeasterly right of way line of US 101 . 2 . Thence along said course (11) South 43° 231 East, 160 feet, more or less, to the northwesterly terminus of the course numbered (12) of said deed. Thence along courses numbered (12) through (15) , particularly South 50003150 " East, 85 .96 feet; South 43c) 23 ' East, 830 .13 feet; South 560061 East, 297 .68 feet; and South 360 28 ' 40 " East, 250 .59 feet to the northwesterly terminus of the course numbered (16) of said deed. Thence along said course (16) South 25° 33 ' 40 " East, 79. 59 feet to the northwesterly terminus of the course numbered (3) as described in the deed to the State of California recorded January 20 , 1966, in Volume 1382 of Official Records at Page 645 , records of. said County, being a point in the northeasterly right of way line of US 101 . 3. Thence along said course (3) and the course numbered ( 2) of said deed, particularly South 360 28 ' 20 " East, 426 . 54 feet; and South 8017142 " West, 230 .43 feet to a point in the line between stakes M. 11 and A.G. 7 , as described in the deed recorded January 23 , 1918 in Book 120 of Deeds at Page 276 , being the existing limit line of the -City of Atascadero . 4. Thence along said line North 86015 ' East, 1135 feet, more or less, to�.said stake A.G. 7 . Thence the following courses and distances per'' said deed recorded January 23 , 1918 : South 62° East, 297. 0 feet ' to stake A.G. 8 ; North 28° East, 1467 . 18 feet to a point the center of the Salinas River; and North 65045 ' West, 2317 . 26 feet to the, true point of beginning. Enclosing an area of approximately 109 acres . '�. CERT�FfED BY C0L�JTY SU 'r �12,3 EXHiI WUNCIL MEETIPSG : 2/25/85 AGFNDA ITFM NO, : C 5 M E M O R A N D U M • TO: City Council February 25, 1985 VIA: Ralph H. Dowell, Jr. , Acting City Manager FROM: Henry Engen, Planning Director RE: Draft Resolution Approving Annexation No. 4 to the City of Atascadero (Wastewater Treatment Plant) BACKGROUND On October 17 , 1984 the Local Agency Formation Commission approved the City' s requested annexation. On February 7 , 1985 the City re- ceived the enclosed communication from LAFCO approving said annexation without a public hearing or election. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt the attached draft Resolution No. 16-85 annexing the wastewater treatment plant property to the City of Atascadero. HE:ps Enclosure: February 4,1985 communication from LAFCO Draft Resolution No. 16-85 Annexation Area Map • l� • RESOLUTION NO. 16-85 A RESOLUTION OF THE ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL APPROVING THE ANNEXATION NO. 4 TO THE CITY OF ATASCADERO (WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT) WHEREAS, on September 19, 1984 the City filed with the Local . Agency Formation Commission a proposal for annexation of territory to the City of Atascadero; and WHEREAS, the matter was heard by the Local Agency Formation Commission on October 17 , 1984 and recommended for approval; and WHEREAS, the Local Agency Formation Commission, considering the pro- posal, found the territory proposed to be annexed is uninhabited; that all of the owners within such territory have given their written con- sent to such annexation; and that the territory proposed for annexa- tion is located within the sphere of influence of the City of Atasca- dero; and WHEREAS, on the Council, at a regular meeting held on May 29, 1984, did prezone Annexation Area No. 4 (sewage treatment plant) to P (Pub- lic; and WHEREAS, the annexation of this land area to the City has been found to be exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Qual- ity Act pursuant to Section 15319 (Class 19) of the State C.E.Q.A. Guidelines. NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Atascadero does resolve as as follows: 1. That the legal description approved by the Local Agency Formation Commission attached hereto, (marked Exhibit A) , and incorporated by reference herein as though set forth in full is hereby approved annexing Annexation No. 4 to the City of Atascadero. 2. That the City Manager is authorized and directed to mail certified , copies of this resolution, legal description and map showing boundaries of the area approved to the Local Agency Formation Commission together with a check in the amount of $480.00 to the State Board of Equalization. On motion by and seconded by , the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety by the following roll call vote: AYES: . �t NOES: ABSENT: ADOPTED: CITY OF ATASCADERO By ROLFE D. NELSON, Mayor ATTEST: ROBERT M. JONES, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO C T: RALPH H. DOWELL, JR. Acting City Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: ALLEN GRIMES, City Attorney tt� t r -� r 3 •i..��y�'r-r,_ �— � 1a, \•---1-']s��r• as \ �� .. / IN .• tai ,�_ "�.►��'�""� � .,�,,',r,} , � / __ �ti �; Or To —rya ? F'��•-"---'--."-.:--:----}••:,_•.�_�•+� �.� Y-•�,,,a�a�z _ a_ '7`.-� � .� / .� .> � - �• --- :rfi -9f z .l ` :�.• .Y ;L + . nom _ �5-•'.hew: - �� � : � .. - Xni, •j. •f,.•.' • - 1ST•...•• ..S•.�,.Mr»• _ 14 NN ... ... .... .:�,.•� .� t-�,��4 � �� � � � � - `a ` - .,, 'V 01 +'. �7,-',-.1 �� •n �. 7t. �• � �, .1 ./• .•j .� '\ y_,.'• wt. Q S � ?.,tt'e .'y ..y q '4, w ,. J3 `{' "��'.Zlt'£� � U '� 'U •�� ,� {`�r� 1 �'� .� `� '7 n "y,` 'a ,*a ~rr, `+% "� '� RECeIVE-FEB 0%5 A 18500 wxouxsEi:nips[ County of San Luis Obispo COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER SAN LUIS OBISPO,CALIFORNIA 93408 (805)549-5011 r OFFICE OF THE February 4, 1985 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR Mr. Henry Engen Planning Director City of Atascadero P . 0. Box 747 Atascadero , CA 93423 Dear Mr. Engen : Enclosed are copies of LAFCo resolutions 84-41 (Approving Annexation No . 4 to the City of Atasca- dero, Wastewater Treatment Plant ) and 84-43 (Approv- ing Annexation No. 3 to the City of Atascadero, Holi - day Inn ) . Also enclosed are "Filing Procedure instructions for each annexation . In the case of Annexation No. 4 (Wastewater Treatment Plant ) , please note that LAFCo has authorized the city to complete the annexation without public notice , hearing or election . For Annexation No . 3 ( Holiday Inn) , the city is authorized to initiate proceedings to annex the territory as specified in the filing instructions . Following its decisions on the annexations , the city must send certified copies of its resolutions to the LAFCo office . These reso- lutions must be accompanied by the other materials specified in the filing procedures in order to final - ize the annexations . Thank you for your patience in this matter. Please feel free to call if you have any questions . Sincerely , 07A PAUL L . HOOD Deputy Executive Officer Local Agency Formation Commission PLH:mjw (5598u ) U �c; i SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA. 93408 FILING PROCEDURE Re: Annexation No. 4 to the City of Atascadero (Wastewater Treatment Plant) At its meeting on October 17, 1984 the Local Agency Formation Commission adopted the enclosed resolution approving the above-referenced proposal subject to the terms and conditions specified in the resolution. Your agency (City, County, or Special District) is the conducting authority responsible for completing subsequent proceed- v ings. Pursuant to Government Code Section 35220 et seq. (56290 et seq. for Special Districts), the conducting authority must take the following r actions upon receipt of the Commission's resolution: r 1. Adopt a resolution initiating proceedings for the proposal which Y shall comply with the Commission's resolution and shall 2. Set a date for public hearing on the proposal which shall not be less than 30 days nor more than 45 days after the date of adoption of the resolution initiating proceedings (not less than 15 days nor more than 60 days for Special Districts). At the public hearing, the conducting authority shall hear and receive all oral and written protest. Based upon the amount of written protest filed and not withdrawn by resident voters or landowners, the conducting authority shall act to either (a) order the boundary change without election, (b) order the boundary change subject to confirmation by the voters, or (c) deny the boundary change. If your Board/Council adopts an ordinance or resolution ordering a boundary change, the following materials must be sent to the LAFCo office for filing: l Sixteen certified copies of the ordinance or resolution approving the boundary change. 2. Sixteen* copies of the legal description of boundaries approved by LAFCo. 3, Sixteen copies of the map showing boundaries of the area approved by LAFCo. 4. The State Board of Equalization fee in the amount of $ 480.00 made payable to "State Board of Equalization." (If your District is not carried on the regular County Assessment Roll, please indi- x. r -s tate when submitting documents--no fee is required.) 5. Certificate Re: Terms and Conditions and Indebtedness (if attached). x x�sa r rd� r, The Executive Officer will check all documents for compliance before making filings with the County Recorder, State Board of Equalization, and County Assessor. Amendments to the LAFCo resolution, including boundary modifications, may be made only by the Commission. If you need more information, please call the LAFCo office at 549-5011. February Date PAUL L. HOOD Deputy Executive Officer rw 3/82 * May be included as part of the resolution r IN THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA Wednesday, October 17, 1984 PRESENT: Commissioners Ruth Brackett, Jerry Diefenderfer, Melanie Billig, Gene Shelton, and Chairman Ken DeTilla ABSENT: None RESOLUTION NO. 84-41 RESOLUTION MAKING DETERMINATIONS APPROVING THE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF ATASCADERO d4 The following resolution is now offered and read: �Yh WHEREAS, on September 19, 1984, there was filed with this Commission a proposal for an annexation of territory to the City of Atascadero; and }v a WHEREAS, the Executive Officer has given the notices — required by law and has forwarded copies of his report to f officers, persons, and public agencies prescribed by law; and WHEREAS, the matter was duly set for public hearing at 9:00 . a.m. on October 17, 1984, and the public hearing was duly conducted and determination and decision made on October 17, 1984; and WHEREAS, at said hearing, this Commission heard and received all oral and written protests, objections, and evidence, which were made, presented, or filed, and all persons present were given the opportunity to hear and be heard in respect to any matter relating to said proposal and report; and W' � WHEREAS, the Commission has duly considered the proposal t,�w and finds that the territory proposed to be annexed is uninhabited; that the distinctive short form designation of the �.` territory proposed to be annexed is "Annexation No. 4 to the City of Atascadero (Wastewater Treatment Plant)"; that all of the owners of land within such territory have given their written consent to such annexation; that the territory proposed for annexation is located within the sphere of influence of the City of Atascadero; and that the proposed annexation should be approved. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED by the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of San Luis Obispo, State of California, as follows: 1. That the recitals set forth hereinabove are true, correct, and valid. 5 2. That this project is found to be exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15319 (Class 19) of the State CEQA Guidelines. 3. That the legal description approved by this Commission t - is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A", and incorporated by L reference herein as though set forth in full. That Annexation No. 4 to the City of Atascadero (Wastewater Treatment Plant), being further identified in the - files of this Commission as file No. 6-R-84, is hereby approved ^= - and the City Council of the City of Atascadero is authorized to initiate proceedings to annex such territory without notice and hearing and without an election. 5.. That the Executive Officer of this Commission is directed to prepare and file a Notice of Exemption for this project in the manner required by law. 6. That the Executive Officer of this Commission is authorized and directed to mail certified copies of this resolution in the manner provided by law. Upon motion of Commissioner Brackett, seconded by Commissioner Billig, and on the following roll call vote, to wit: AYES: Commissioners BRACKETT, BILLIG, DIEFENDERFER, SHELTON, and DeTILLA NOES: None s ABSENT: None ABSTAINING: None the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted. a man o sa o rcal Agency Formation Comm ion ATTEST: V\mA Deputy Executive Officer APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL EFFECT: JAMES B. LINDHOLM, JR. County Counsel Deputy County Counsel STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss. COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO I, William E. Briam, Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of said County and State, do hereby certifythe foregoing ging to be a full, true, and correct copy of the original on file in my office, and that I have carefully compared the same with the original. WITNESS my hand this ST day of WILLIAM E. BRIAM Executive Officer By: � . �\cm\ Deputy Executive Officer 2302e F V PROPOSED ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF ATASCADERO LEGAL DESCRIPTION: All that portion of real property of the unrecorded Lot 3 of Rancho Atascadero, County of San Luis Obispo, State of Calif- ornia, lying adjacent to and southerly of Block 9 of the Atas- cadero Colony as shown on a map in Book 3A, page 7 of Maps, in the office of the County Recorder, County of San Luis Obispo, lying easterly of the easterly right of way line of the Southern Pacific Railroad, and lying northerly of the southeasterly boundary and its northeasterly extension, of the existing Atascadero County Sanitation District disposal facilities designated as Phase I on Exhibit "A" of that Agreement recorded in Book 1816, Page 812, Official Records, in the office of the County Recorder in said County, more particularly described as: Beginning at the south corner of said Block 9, being a point on the easterly line of the right-of-way of Southern Pacific Rail- road; thence, along the southeasterly line of said Block 9, North 39022 ' East, 2500feet, more or less, to the centerline of the Salinas River; thence, along said centerline, South 12°45 ' East, 3300 feet to a point; thence, continuing along said centerline, South 57055 ' East , 350 feet, more or less, to a point on the northeasterly extension of said southeasterly boundary of said Atascadero County Sanitation District disposal facilities; thence, southwesterly along said extension and boundary, South 270 21' West, 1650 feet, more or less, to the south corner of said facilities, said corner lying on the said easterly line of said railroad right-of-way; thence, along said right of way line; North 62039 ' West, 365.00 feet, more or less, to the beginning of a curve concave to the northeast, whose radius is 1950.0 feet; thence, continuing on said right of way, along the arc of said o curve, a distance of 1480. 00 feet through a central angle of 43029 ' to a point; thence, continuing along said right of way, North 19010 ' West, 1775. 00 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. CERTIFIED DY C0UNTy' '`,' `I' R "' � �r r-e� �. U RC�,O ALF $ IT ��' q6CIL MEETING : 2/25/85 AGENDA ITEM NO. D _ 1 • TO: City Council February 25, 1985 FROM: Ralph H. Dowell, Jr . " � Acting City Manager SUBJECT: MID-YEAR BUDGET REVIEW In reviewing the potential amount of material and discussion that could take place during the Mid-Year Budget Report, I suggest we schedule this as a study session, with a recommended date of March 9 , 1985 in Room 304, at 9:00 a.m. It is suggested that this proposal be discussed by Council and, if approved, this meeting be adjouned to the March 9th study session. i RHD:kv i OUNCIL MEETING : 2/25/85 AGENDA ITEM NO. : D 2 • M E M O R A N D U M TO: Acting City Manager -"7e_C FROM: Public Works Superintendent SUBJECT: Advertisement with Dial-A-Ride DATE: February 21, 1985 Attached is a modified Dial-A-Ride brochure which has been up-dated with new information, as requested by Council, concerning the operations of Dial-A-Ride. The information contained in this brochure will appear in ad form in the Atascadero News on February 22 and February • 27 and has also been forwarded to the Council members. The cost of the news ad for appearing twice will be $134.40 and charged to account X605-40-2240-5002. IW" l -DON LEI DL:vh att. • m6mRIVE 466=RIDE � Atascadero Dial-A-Ride is a transportation service for the general public in the City of Atascadero. Dial-A-Ride provides service from 7:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. NOW DIAL-A-RIDE WORKS Just call the Control Center at 466-RIDE and tell us: 1. Your pick up address 2. Where you want to go 3. Your telephone number 4. Number of uersons and , any special information (such as wheelchair, appointment time, etc.) 5. Arrangements can be made for a pick up or return ride with the original phone call for pick up. 6. Reservations can be made up to six days in advance but no less than 2 hours, to insure arriving at your destination on time. 7. For prompt service, it is best to schedule your rides between 9:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m. 8. If placed on "hold" when you phone, be patient as the operator is also the bus dispatcher. You will be given an estimated pickup time when you call. PLEASE BE READY WHEN THE VEHICLE ARRIVES, because it can only wait 60 seconds so other people are not delayed. If you decide not to take a trip that you arranged earlier, please call to cancel it. FARES Regular one-way fare is 50t. Senior Citizens (those 60 and over) and children under 40 inches tall, ride for 25�.. Babies in arms are free. PLEASE PAVE EXACT FARE. OUNCIL MEETING : 2/25/85 AGEMDA ITEM NO, : D - 3 _M_E M_O_R A_N_D_U M_ DATE: February 20, 1985 c < � TO: Ralph Dowell, Acting City Manager—T'. - City Council Members FROM: Bob Best, Recreation Director SUBJECT: Naming of New City Park As you are probably aware, the Atascadero Recreation Advisory Board conducted a contest during November-December 1984 concerning naming our new park in South Atascadero. Many suggestions were received by the Board for a new name. After considering all suggestions, the Advisory Board selected the Paloma Creek Park. As a result, I am asking that the City Council officially name our new city park "Paloma Creek Park A resolution is attached for your adoption providing you approve the name. �eos Recreation Director gh Attachment • l l� RESOLUTION NO. 17 - 85 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF ATASCADERO TO NAME ITS NEW PARK LOCATED AT VIEJO CAMINO AND HALCON ROAD IN ATASCADERO WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Atascadero City Council that a proper name be assigned to the new south Atascadero park located at Viejo Camino and Halcon Road. WHEREAS, the Atascadero Recreation Advisory Board has forwarded their recommendations to the City Council for the naming of said park. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that the Atascadero City Council does hereby select the name of Paloma Creek Park as the official name of the park located at Viejo Camino and Halcon Road. On motion by Councilman and seconded by Councilman , the foregoing resolution is here- by adopted on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ADOPTED: February 25, 1985 ROLFE NELSON, Mayor ATTEST: ROBERT M. JONES, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ALLEN GRIMES, City Attorney APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: RALPH H. DOWELL, JR. , Acting City Manager 1 J&UNCIL MEETING : 2/25/85 AGENDA ITEM NO , : D - 4 M E M O R A N D U M I TO: Acting City Manager FROM: Consulting City Engineer SUBJECT: Bid for Phase II Administration Building Renovation DATE: February 21, 1985 On January 28, 1985 we received bids for the renovation of the administration building. The apparent low bidder was Bailey Con- struction Company of Santa Barbara, California who presented a total bid of $406,300. Their bid for the most basic portion of the work was $309,900. It is currently estimated that the available funds in all items budgeted in this years budget for the renovation would be exceeded by $75,000 to $85,000 in order to accept even the basic bid. We have recently learned from the State Department* of Historical Preservation that the City is being strongly considered for funding of a portion of this work under previously adopted Proposition 18. • We will not receive a firm committment from the State until March 1, 1985. Any monies spent or work let to bid before that date will not qualify for matching funds. Therefore, considering the facts that 1) to appropriate the additional monies from contingency reserves at this time would significantly deplete this reserve, and 2) the strong possibility of having grant funding if the project were rebid, I recommend that all bids be rejected by City Council action at their meeting of February 25, 1985. Further, that the bid bonds be returned to the bidders and the project be reconfigured to be within any combination of city funding and state funding depending upon grant availability. CXJ JOHN WALLACE JW:vh • 9 0 PERFORMANCE DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION, INC. 525 Pine Street Paso Robles, California 93446 • (805) 238-0911 25, February 1985 City Council City of Atascadero Atascadero, California 93446 Dear Council : Our._firm has been retained by a group of indviduals to act on their behalf to extend an offer to build a new Police facility for the City of Atascadero. They have directed me to cooridinate a time that we may meet and discuss the possibilities of a lease, lease with option to buy or sale. Please contact me so that we may set a time and date at your earliest convenience. I look forward to your prompt reply. Yours Ver , ,P ith Vice President JPS/bas