The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda Packet 12/10/1984 r • AGENDA - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting December 10 , 1984 at 7:30 p.m. Atascadero Administration Building Call to Order Pledge of Allegiance Invocation Roll Call Public Comments City Council Comments A. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Item A, Consent Calendar, are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion in the form listed below. There will be no separate discussion of these items. If discussion is required, that item will be removed from the Consent Calendar and will be considered separately. Vote may be by roll call. 1. Minutes of the regular meeting of November 26 , 1984 (RECOMMEND APPROVAL) 2. Acceptance of tenative Parcel Map 11-83 at 6700, 6750, and 6760 El Camino Real - Herb La Prade (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) 3. Acceptance of tenative Parcel Map 24-84 at 7955 Bella Vista Douglas Friend (Twin Cities Engineering) (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) 4. Acceptance of tenative Tract Map 27-84 at 5319 Honda - David Marazzo/Ben Gage (Kennaly Engineering) (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) B. HEARINGS, APPEARANCES AND REPORTS 1. Planning Department Building Permit Processing - Verbal status report by Planning Director 2. South Atascadero Park - Verbal progress report by Recreation Director 3. Status of Traffic Enforcement and Special Enforcement - Verbal status report by Police Chief • 4. Bounty for Drunk Drivers - Verbal report by Police Chief • • C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Staff Study concerning Construction of Sidewalks on El Camino Real 2. Administration Building Renovation Phase II Bid advertisement status and recap D. NEW BUSINESS 1. City Council Meeting, December 24, 1984 — Formalization to cancel meeting. 2. Public Works Director Position Recruitment - Scheduling of oral interview date 3. Dial-A-Ride Good Will Promotion, December 17-21, 1984 - Bus fare waived in lieu of donation of a can of food 4. Dial-A-Ride Van Purchase Bid - Acceptance of Bid No. 84-18 5. Council Discussion Re: Special exception to General Plan Concept E. ATASCADERO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT • (Council will recess and convene as the Atascadero County Sanitation District Board of Directors) 1. Proposed Ordinance 95 - Amending Section 10 of Ordinance 54 regarding sewer service charges to restaurants. (Second Reading) (Cont'd from 11/26/84) F. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION 1. City Council 2. City Attorney 3. City Clerk 4. City Treasurer 5. City Manager NOTE: There will be a closed session to consider potential litigations; no announcement after closed session is anticipated. • . •OUNCIL MEETING : 12/10/84 MINUTES - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. : A .- 1 Regular Meeting � m veber 2.6 , 1984 ascadero Administration Building Page 1 The regular meeting was called to order at 7 :30 p.m. by Mayor Nelson. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited. Invocation was given by Gene Hinsly of the Assembly of God Church. ROLL CALL Present: Councilman Molina, Handshy, Councilwoman Norris and Mackey and Mayor Nelson. Absent: None STAFF Ralph Dowell, Acting gity Manager and City Treasurer; Allen Grimes, City Attorney; Grigger JoAes, City C1 Uk; Georgia Ramirez, Deputy Citt Clerk; Henry Engen, Planning Director; John Wallace, Contract Engineer; Bob Best, Recreation Director; Mike HicVs, Fire Chief; and Bud McHale Police Chief. PUBLIC COMMENT None IROUNCIL COMMENT Councilwoman Mackey said she had received a phone call asking about the possi- bility of starting a program of citizen' s turning in drunk drivers. Police Chief McHale said he would look into that possibility. ePRESENTATION Mayor Nelson and Elliott Stepehnson presented Certificates of Appreciation to Joseph Souza and Greg Smith for the work they had done on the Atascadero Lake Shoreline Improvement Project. A. CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Minutes of the regular meeting of November 13, 1984 (RECOMMEND APPROVAL) 2 . Treasurer ' s Report - 10/1/84 to 10/31/84 (RECOMMEND APPROVAL) 3. Finance Director' s Report - 10/1/84 to 10/31/84 - (RECOMMEND APPROVAL) 4. Claim of Anthony Plantaz for damages in the amount of $15,000 (RECOMMEND DENIAL) • 5. Acceptance of final Parcel Map 6-83 at 3100 San Fernando Road Dutra (Hohenstein) (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOM- MENDATION) -1- MINUTES - ATASCADERO CI`O COUNCIL • Regular Meeting November 26 , 1984 Atascadero Administration Building Page 2 6 . Acceptance of final parcel Map 16-83 at 11875 Halcon Road - Calkins (Twin Cities Engineering) (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) 7 . Acceptance of final Parcel Map 2-84 at 11745 Halton Road - Bella Vista Investments (Twin Cities Engineering) (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) 8. Acceptance of final Parcel Map 10-84 at 11645 Halcon Road — Davis (Twin Cities Engineering) (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) 9. Acceptance of final Lot Line Adjustment 12-84 at 9155-.9195 San Diego Road - Benrich Construction (Kennealy Engineering) (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) 10. Consideration of staff report for a time extension on Tentative Parcel Map at 821007 :1 at 6990 Valle - Lee (Greenaway Construction) (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF 'PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) 11. Tentative Parcel Map 26-84 Request submitted by Kathleen Nimmo to create two lots of 2 . 65 acres each from an existing 5. 3 acre parcel in the RS (Residential Suburban) zone. The site is located at 8200 Los Osos Road, also known as Lot 19 of Block 27 . Negative Declaration to the provisions of CEQA is to be certified. (RECOM- MENDED APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) MOTION: By Councilman Molina, seconded by Councilwoman Mackey to approve Consent Items A 1-11. Passed unanimously by roll call vote. B. HEARINGS, APPEARANCES AND REPORTS 1. Appeal by County Savings Bank (Brady) - Appeal of Planning Commis- sion' s denial of a third monument sign at Adobe P1"aza Center. Conditional Use Permit 20-87. Henry Engen, Planning Director gave staff report. Mike Brady and Gina Holt, Branch Manager of County Savings Bank, spoke regarding the reasons they felt the sign was necessary. Councilwoman Mackey said she does not favor an additional sign of that type in the Adobe Plaza Center. Councilman Molina supports the approval of the sign. Councilwoman Norris supports an additional sign. Councilman Handshy felt that another sign would not be excessive and supports the approval of the sign. -2- MINUTES - ATASCADERO C6 COUNCIL • Regular Meeting November 26, 1984 Atascadero Administration Building Page 3 Mayor Nelson supported the sign and felt that it encourages 0 y PP g g business. MOTION: By Councilman Molina, seconded by Councilwoman Norris to approve the sign and to adopt Resolution No. 61-84 . Passed 4 :1 by roll call vote with Councilwoman Mackey voting no. 2. Report of the City Attorney - No. 31 City Attorney, Allen Grimes, gave report No. 31. C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Proposed Ordinance No. 86 - Municipal Code revision of Ordinance No. 4, establishing the office of City Manager and determining the appointment responsibilities and duties thereof. (Second Reading) MOTION: By Councilman Molina, seconded by Councilman Handshy to read by title only. Motion adopted. Mayor Nelson read Ordinance No. 86 by title only. MOTION: By Councilwoman Mackey, seconded by Councilman Handshy to adopt Ordinance No. 86 . Passed unanimously by roll call vote. 2. Proposed Ordinance No. 90 — Amending Title 1' and Repealing Secti 6 of Ordinance 72 . (Second reading) MOTION: By Councilman Molina, seconded by Councilman Handshy to read by title only. Motion adopted. Ordinance No. 90 was read by Mayor Nelson by title only. MOTION: By Councilwoman Mackey, seconded by Councilman Handshy to adopt Ordinance No. 90. Passed unanimously by roll call vote. 3. Proposed Ordinance No. 91 - Prohibition of the distribution and display of drug paraphernalia. . (Second Reading) MOTION: By Councilman Molina, seconded by Councilwoman Norris to read by title only. Motion adopted. Mayor Nelson read Ordinance No. 91 by title only. MOTION: By Councilwoman Norris, seconded by Councilwoman Mackey to adopt Ordinance No. 91. Passed unanimously by roll call vote. -3 MINUTES - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting November 26, 1984 *Atascadero Administration Building age 4 4. Proposed Ordinance No. 92 - Authorization for Temporary Street Closure for Special Events. (Second Reading) MOTION: By Councilwoman Mackey, seconded by Councilman Handshy to read by title only. Motion adopted. Ordinance No. 92 was read by Mayor Nelson by title only. MOTION: By Councilman Molina, seconded by Councilwoman Norris to adopt Ordinance No. 92. Passed unanimously by roll call vote. 5. Proposed Ordinance No. 93 - Amending Tables 3 and 4 of the Atascadero Municipal Code by Repealing Ordinances 12, 17 and 65 of the City of Atascadero and Chapters 2.41 and 16 . 04 of the County Code Provisions. (Second Reading) MOTION: By Councilman Molina, seconded by Councilwoman Mackey to read by title only. Motion adopted. Ordinance No. 93 was read by Mayor Nelson by title only. MOTION: By Councilwoman Mackey, seconded by Councilman Handshy to adopt Ordinance No. 93 . Passed unanimously by roll call vote. 6. Proposed Ordinance No. 94 - Pre Zoning Annexation Area No. 3 (second reading) MOTION: By Councilman Molina, seconded by Councilwoman Mackey to read by title only. Motion adopted. Ordinance No. 94 was read by title only by Mayor Nelson. , MOTION: By Councilwoman Mackey, seconded by Councilwoman Norris to adopt Ordinance No. 94 . Passed unanimously by roll call vote. 7 . Council Discussion of Downtown Parking Mayor Nelson said that the Striping Program will proceed, as scheduled and the Parking Study will be postponed until after the recruitment of a Public Works Director, allowing additional technical engineer- ing input to the study. The Parking Study will then be returned for Council review. 8. Committee Report of Downtown Revitalization Activity Gary Larson, of the Chamber of Commerce, Co-Chairman of the Task Force, gave a brief update on accomplishments. A review of the , central business district r t revealed commercialro erti p p es are sporadically mixed with incompatible uses and occasionally operating in sub-standard buildings. The area lacks a central theme. These are conditions leading to blight. In addition, an expansion of the -4- t f L r • MINUTES - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting November 26, 1984 Atascadero Administration Building Page 5 central business district across Atascadero Creek has created two I shopping areas that are inadequately linked. Priorities include: 1) Adequate off-street parking in the central business district 2) incentives and/or encouragement for central business district property upgrading to conform with the landscaping plan 3) bridge construction connecting Lewis Ave. and Santa Ysabel. Gary Larson and Henry Engen, Planning Director attended a seminar stressing the need for a marketing study addressing economic feasibility. The Task Force will make final recommendations soon. D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Proposed Resolution No. 62-84 - Grant Fund Availability from Petroleum Violation Escrow Account Ralph Dowell, Acting City Manager, gave staff report. MOTION: By Councilman Molina, seconded by Councilwoman Mackey for adoption of Resolution No. 62-84 . Passed unanimously by roll call vote. MOTION: By Councilwoman Mackey, seconded by Councilman Molina to adjourn as City Council and convene as Atascadero County Sanitation District. Passed unanimously. E. ATASCADERO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 1. Proposed Ordinance 95 - Amending Section 10 of ordinance 54 re- garding sewer service charges to restaurants. (First Reading) Ralph Dowell, Acting City Manager, gave staff report. MOTION: By Director Molina, seconded by Director Handshy to read by title only. Motion adopted. Ordinance No. 95 was read by Mayor Nelson by title only. MOTION: By Director Molina, seconded by Director Handshy that this consti- tutes first reading. Passed unanimously. MOTION: By Director Molina, seconded by Director Norris to adjourn as Board of Directors and reconvene as City Council. Passed unanimously. F. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION 1. CITY COUNCIL Councilman Handshy requested the status of the Public Works Director position recruitment process. Acting City Manager, Ralph Dowell said that the city has received 11 applications and requested a committee of two for the screening process. Councilman Molina an Handshy are on that committee. -5- MINUTES - ATASCADERO CI19COUNCIL Regular Meeting November 26, 1984 Atascadero Administration Building Page 6 • Councilwoman Norris said she is still receiving complaints on building permits. She asked Henry Engen, Planning Director, what the turn around time is, and he responded that it is about 8 weeks. Part of this delay has been caused by accepting incomplete appli- cations in the past and this is being corrected. Councilman Molina requested the status on the speeding and moving violations on El Camino and he expressed concerns from the last meeting on November 13th. Bud McHale, Police Chief, reported that the Police Department has increased traffic enforcement. 2. CITY ATTORNEY None 3. CITY TREASURER None 4. CITY CLERK None 5. CITY MANAGER Acting City Manager, Ralph Dowell, reported on the following: 1. A Police school resources officer will begin enforcement duties on Wednesday, November 28th. 2. A proposed business license ordinance is being prepared and will be scheduled for council review in the near future. 3. Possible cancallation of the December 24 Council meeting will be reviewed at the December 10th Council Meeting. 4 . Mayor Nelson and Councilman Handshy will serve on a committee with the Personnel Analyst to review applications for the City Manager position. 5. Medical Foundation, of Santa Barbara is changing to Blue Cross and the change over will be completed by December 7 . 6. Mayor Nelson, Henry Engen, Planning Director, Ralph Dowell, Acting City Manager and Councilwoman Mackey will prepare an Agenda with the time of the Planning Commission/City Council Joint Meeting. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 8: 46 P.M. TO A CLOSED SESSION. CLOSED SESSION ADJOURNED AT 9: 00 P.M. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 9: 01 P.M. RECORDED BY: or BERT M. SES, City Clerk r *OUNCIL MEETING: . 12/10/84 M E M O R A N D U M AGENDA ITEM No. : A - 2 • TO: CITY COUNCIL December 10, 1984 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 11-83 APPLICANT: Herb LaPrade LOCATION: 6700, 6750 and 6760 E1 Camino Real (Lot 6, Block EB) REQUEST: To allow the division of a one acre parcel into two lots to separate the existing uses. On December 3, 1984, the Planning Commission conducted a public hear- ing on the above referenced subject unanimously (with Commissioners LaPrade and Sherer absent) approving the request subject to the find- ings and conditions contained in the Staff Report dated November 7, 1983, with deletion of Condition #1. • There was only brief discussion among the Commission concerning this matter . Herb LaPrade, applicant, appeared and indicated his concurrence with the recommendation. No one else appeared on the matter . r HENRY ENGE RALPH H. DOWELL, JR. Planning D recto Acting City Manager Ps • City of Atascadero Item• B-2 STAFF REPORT FOR: City Planning Commission Meeting Date: December 3, 1984 BY: Joel Moses, Assoc. Planner File No: TPM 11-83 Project Address: 6700 , 6750 and 6760 E1 Camino Real (Lot 6, Block EB) (Herb LaPrade) SUBJECT: To allow the division of a one acre parcel into two lots to separate the existing uses. BACKGROUND: On November 7 , 1983, the Planning Commission reviewed and approved Tentative Parcel Map 11-83. The parcel map would create three CR (Commercial Retail) zoned lots from .95 acres ( .30 , .31 and .34 acres) The approval was subject to three conditions. Over the past year, the applicant has worked with the City to comply with Condition #1 to bring the existing structures into conformance with applicable provi- sions of the Uniform Building Code. The applicant now wishes to revise his map to eliminate a property line that was requiring extensive construction to bring the building into conformance with the Uniform Building Code. The proposed re- vised map (attached) would create two lots of .64 and .31 acres. RECOMMENDATION: Staff would recommend approval of revised Tentative Parcel Map 11-83 subject to the conditions required in the staff report dated November 7, 1983 (attached) , except that Condition #1 be deleted. JM:ps Enclosures: Revised Tentative Parcel Map (10/22/84) Staff report dated November 7, 1983 • ti �ZS 3 � � •. v $ e St 4, Lil co W4 fill 14 o �� n O. Sc ova It jr W .\ 3nNiAv ca'gab,St LV n.- CITY OF ATASCADERO i9is r R ® 1979 Planning Department November 7, 1983 CA►DF,j�O/� STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 11-83 LOCATION: 6700, 6750 and 6760 E1 Camino Real (Lot 6, Block EB) APPLICANT: Herbert LaPrade (Daniel J. Stewart) REQUEST: To allow division of a 0 .95 acre parcel into three parcels of 0.30, 0.31 and 0 .34 acres each. BACKGROUND 1. Existing Zoning: CR 2. General Plan: Retail Commercial 3. Environmental Determination: The Planning Director has determined the project to be categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Class 15) . 4. Site Conditions: The 0 .95 acre site is currently developed with a service station, a tire and brake service shop, and a real estate office. The property has frontage on both El Camino Real and Atascadero Avenue. The topography on the parcel is flat (paved parking) . 5. Project Description: The applicant requests permission to divide his 0.95 acre lot into three parcels of 0.30, 0. 31 and 0. 34 acres. There are three existing buildings on the site: a tire shop, a service station, and a real estate office. Each of these build- ings will be on a separate lot. Existing access to each building will be maintained, however, a 14 foot access easement through Parcel 2 will be recorded to allow for additional access to the tire shop from E1 Camino Real. Parcels 1 and 2 will have frontage on E1 Camino Real, while Parcel 3 will front on Atascadero Avenue. 6. Determination of minimum lot size: There is no minimum lot size in the CR Zone. 7. Subdivision Review Board: On October 6, 1983 the Subdivision Re- view Board met with the applicant, Herb LaPrade. Members of the Board in attendance were: Larry McPherson, Public Works Director ; Fred Buss, Associate Planner ; and Wayne LaPrade, Planning Commis- i7 Tentative Parcel Ma 83 (LaPrade) sioner . The Board' s discussion focused on the need to reconcile the new property line locations with Uniform -Building Code re- quirements for fire-resistive construction. ANALYSIS The only Staff concern has to do with the placement of the new proper- ty lines between existing buildings thereby changing Uniform Building Code standards for wall construction. The Uniform Building Code (1976 Edition) requires fire-resistive walls or setbacks from property lines for various occupancies. The applicant proposes placement of the new property lines closer than is allowed based on existing con- struction and occupancies. As a result, walls will need to be up- graded to the appropriate fire-resistive construction or recorded yards will need to be provided. FINDINGS 1. The creation of three lots of 0.30 , 0.31 and 0 .34 acres conforms to all applicable zoning and subdivision regulations and is con- sistent with the General Plan. 2. The creation of three lots in conformance with the recommended conditions of approval will not have a significant adverse effect upon the environment, and the preparation of an Environmental Im- pact Report is not necessary. RECOMMENDATION Based upon the above Findings, the Planning Department recommends ap- proval of Tentative Parcel Map 11-83 subject to the following conditions: 1. Provision shall be made to bring existing structures or their yards into conformance with applicable provisions of Section 504 of the Uniform Building Code based on new property lines proposed by this parcel map. 2. A Final Map in compliance with all conditions set forth herein shall be submitted for review and approval in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City Lot Division Ordinance prior to recordation, a. Monuments shall be set at all new property corners created and a registered civil engineer or licensed land surveyor shall submit a letter certifying that the monuments have been set prior to recordation of the Final Map. 2 I( Tentative Parcel Ma '83 (LaPrade) b. A recently updated preliminary title report shall be submit- ted for review in conjunction with the processing of the Final Map. 3. Approval of this Tentative Parcel Map shall expire two years from the date of final approval. ACTION The Planning Commission should, by motion, direct Staff as deemed appropriate. REPORT PREPARED BY: GREG F Planning Intern REPORT APPROVED BY: LAWRENCE STEVENS Planning Director ps • 3 ti?; h 14 i e h.v twit ik v w 'N 0 .+a n►.tea .ir c .a, 3n/VIRV pal�OdJSt/lt/ �� ?• "' t i - T'b t f Y V r� Y � ,c: Z � .. w's.Y 7��.,4.' - .s N ptih In .';..2. y v v�� N�'�5L° nom. � + +�M- - tGgf .dd'` .�. a•:. f> " _�Lyw'• w + N v 7_v o uw S g' K $'o °.. ' •' �.�tr, Oh`n 6• :# 46 4 . OB u '►y v x�a o i y f H '�` O� � 77 bd o6es w;tm 'a o{, n. - � ��-'*x�•.; ` . �.. � �,�, . �A vlT� - ��'1b 9fS tir. � � -+�, 3'+' •Ts:£r x v ALf p ° �O o.- ,af.-- .�M'� �'� 1 f.^y��;,c�► �''�¢ �"'- -7,.mar�� .' All - - (tz Ct i _ � J�.- 0 �\'$ 5�mann+•n_My y+. kvo_``vJ`N^ -..w ".F'k '� �`�� -�' 31 91 2i o $ ° — pt i 815 •' ..a S. " af} � > - t N� �.: ass '�-- •, � =,�. • 4 + G a + ,� .�. 1; - pv♦ a� • � 4G6s - _{k4 /?S`-�C'i..,. ,.�� _'��, -f.Cs. _ -�f a a i C7 ov �u u � v� � �' J� � * .'gyp. ,�� •'ti•T` �)j``iJ � . ti o O A O � _Ne T• l �, J JAO `` ��,.1� J�. r �.T•' J c 1♦ � � s� � ... ��}tARp" '' + * �T � 715 ' � .. ./yam l /�'� 93 00 ITO x '{ ' '•+ � � '3„k��i �- �5°sem �J psis � �i T�c✓ �I �Al,!/hO TAS • +' �� °Sb0 3 • _... . �o � d• b;� err `�' ��f. •6 Qf/�C, 'E(� or 140 1 B �; , H ti �� rp• z 1 • y tD � yob O ai, • � .. 0 City of Atascadero Item: B-3 STAFF REPORT FOR: City Planning Commission Meeting Date: December 3, 1984 BY: Joel Moses, Assoc. Planner File No: TPM 24-84 Project Address: 7955 Bella Vista (Lot 32, Block 14) SUBJECT: To allow division of ten acres into two lots of five acres each. (Continued public hearing) (Douglas Friend/Twin Cities Engineering) BACKGROUND On October 15 , 1984 , the Planning Commission reviewed the proposed tentative parcel map. The matter was carried over to the November 5th and 19th meetings at the applicant' s request. The applicant proposed to create three lots 3.3 acres each from an existing ten acre lot in the RS zone. The applicant has now submitted a proposed tentative map showing two lots of five acres each. This revision now brings the proposed map into conformance with the minimum lot size of 4.47 acres. At its October 15 , 1984 meeting, the Planning Commission considered the possibility of requiring the owner to develop a portion of Bella Vista Road not adjoining the site. In the past, the City has required that access be provided in conformance with the zoning ordinance (0-12% all weather , 1.2-20% paved, over 20%, paved with adjustment approval) . In a previous occasion, bonds were required for improve- ments on lot frontages along San Fernando Road on Santa Cruz Road (AT 820318:1 Garlick/Stewart) . The applicant was required to dedicate and improve the Santa Cruz frontage of the property and then improve to all-weather status the remaining portion of Santa Cruz back to Gar- cia. The existing proposal along Bella Vista would be not to improve the non-adjoining road section in conformance with past City policy. RECOMMENDATION Staff has attached the previous staff report and conditions. Staff recommends approval of Tentative Parcel Map 24-84 subject to the con- ditions contained in the staff report dated October 15, 1984 with the following revision: Condition #1 to read as follows: "1. The parcel map is approved as per the revised map allowing crea- tion of two five acre parcels. " JM:ps Enclosure: October 15, 1984 Staff Report Revised Parcel Map received November 15, 1984 0 WOUNCIL MEETING: 12/10/84 AGENDA ITEM NO. : A - 3 M E M O R A N D U M TO: CITY COUNCIL December 10, 1984 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 24-84 LOCATION: 7955 Bella Vista (Lot 32, Block 14) APPLICANT: Douglas Friend (Twin Cities Engineering) REQUEST: To create three lots of 3.3 acres each from a 10 acre parcel. On December 3, 1984, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on this request unanimously (with Commissioners LaPrade and • Sherer absent) certifying a Negative Declaration and approving the two way land division subject to the findings and conditions contained in the attached staff report. There was brief discussion among the Commission on this matter rela- tive to whether the applicant shouldn' t be responsible for completing a segment of off-site road since the neighbors had put in 1200 feet of pavement. Russ Thompson with Twin Cities Engineering, representing the appli- cant, stated his concurrence withthe recommended conditions. Jim Haun suggested that access should be via a lot the applicant owned on San Gabriel. He also hoped the applicant would participate in road improvements. HENRYAx NGEN RALPH H. DOWELL JR. Planning Dir for 6 Acting City Manager • ps l� MEETING AGENDAr I DATE 10ITEM#� STAFF REPORT Planning Commission - City of Atascadero Date: October 15, 1984 Item: B-1 Notice of public hearing was Public Hearing Case: TPM 24-84 published in the Atascadero News Public hearing to allow the div- on October 5, 1984 and all owners ision of a 10 acre parcel into of record property located within three lots of 3.3 acres each. 300 feet were notified by United States mail on that same date. A. LOCATION: 7955 Bella Vista (Lot 32, Block 14) B. SITUATION AND FACTS: 1. Request. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .To create three lots of 3.3 acres each from a 10 acre parcel 2. Applicant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Douglas Friend 3. Engineer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .Twin Cities Engineering 4. Site Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Ten acres 5. Streets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Bella Vista is a local street with a 40 foot right-of-way. 6. Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .RS (Residential Suburban) 7. Existing Use. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Vacant land 8. Adjacent Zoning and Use. . . . . .North: RS, vacant South: RS, S.F.R. East: RS, vacant West: RS, vacant 9. General Plan Designation. . . . .Suburban Residential 10. Terrain. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Steep slopes with numerous large oak trees 11. Environmental Status. . . . . . . . .Categorically exempt • C. SITE AND DEVELOPMENT DATA: 1. Site Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .10 acres C� Tentative Parcel Map 24-84 (Friend/Twin Cities Engineering) 2. Required Minimum Lot Sizes Lot Size Factor Average Slope (31 - 35%) 1. 75 Distance from Center .25 Septic Suitability (severe) 1. 50 Road (paved, not City maintained) .50 General Neighborhood Character (2. 3 acres) .47 Minimum lot size: 4.47 3. Minimum lot size reduced by 20%. . . . . . . . . . . .3. 57 4. Proposed lot sizes. . . . . . . . . . .Parcel 1 - 3. 33 acres Parcel 2 - 3.35 acres Parcel 3 - 3.33 acres 5. Access. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Bella Vista, a local paved street not maintained by the City. 6. Shaped. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Roughly rectangular D. ANALYSIS: In the RS Zone, performance standards are applied to determine the minimum lot size, with the possibility of a 20% reduction. If this reduction is requested and applied for , Staff notes that the proposed lot sizes still do not meet the minimum lot size require- ments of the Zoning Ordinance. Staff has further concern with this subdivision because if might be creating unbuildable sites due to the steepness of the slopes. Based on the contour map submitted, these slopes are in excess of 30%. Further topographical data may be needed to determine the exact slope before grading or leach line placement can occur. Septic systems may not be placed on terrain with a slope greater than 30% and must be an engineered design if on a slope of 20% or greater. Grading for a driveway and residence may require addi- tional review with a Conditional Use Permit required for grading on slopes of 30% or greater and a Precise Plan required for slopes of 20% to 30%. The adjacent property owners to this parcel have submitted a let- ter requesting that the applicant pay a fair share of the cost of the road improvement. This would be an agreement between the property owners and not a matter for City involvement. Bella Vista Road is not maintained by the City at this point and the road improvements were privately put in. 2 �� Tentative Parcel Map 24-84 (Friend/Twin Cities Engineering) E. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Tentative Parcel Map 24-84 based upon the following findings and conditions of approval contained in Exhibit "A F. FINDINGS: 1. The creation of three lots of 3.3 acres each on this parcel does not conform to City zoning and subdivision regulations, however, the creation .of two lots in conformance with the recommended con- ditions of approval will not have a significant adverse effect upon `the environment, and preparation of an Environmental Impact ?deport is not necessary. 2. The necessary findings of the State Subdivision Map Act can be made if this project is redesigned into a two lot subdivision. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval Exhibit B - Parcel Map Exhibit C - Location Map Exhibit D - Letter from adjacent property owners DGD:ps 3 l'i Tentative Parcel Map 24-84 (Friend/Twin Cities Engineering) EXHIBIT A - Tentative Parcel Map 24-84 Conditions of Approval October 15, 1984 1. The Parcel Map shall be redesigned into a subdivision of two lots into a subdivision of two lots to conform to zoning and subdivi- sion regulations. 2. Private sewage disposal systems will be an acceptable method of sewage disposal if reports and designs are acceptable. All tests, reports and designs shall conform to methods and guidelines pre- scribed by the Manual of Septic Tank Practices and other appli- cable City Ordinances. The following note shall appear on the Final Map: - "Appropriate soils reports including a percolation test, a test to determine the presence of ground water, and a log of a soil boring to a minimum depth of ten (10) feet shall be submitted to the Planning Department prior to the issuance of a building permit. Where soils reports indicate that conventional soil absorption systems are not acceptable, City approval of plans for an alterna- tive private sewage disposal system, designed by a Registered Civil Engineer, shall be required. Depending upon the system, more restrictive requirements may be imposed. " 3. Water shall be obtained from the Atascadero Mutual Water Company and water lines shall exist at the frontage of each parcel or its public utility easement prior to recordation of the Final Map. 4. All existing and proposed utility easements, pipelines and other easements are to be shown on the Final Map. If there are other building or other restrictions related to the easements, they shall be noted on the Final Map. 5. Grading that would be disruptive to the natural topography shall be minimized. Removal of existing, mature trees shall also be minimized. The following shall appear as a Note on the Final Map: "No trees shall be removed without compliance with applicable City Ordinances. No grading shall commence without an appropriate per- mit and compliance with applicable City ordinances. " 6. Drainage and erosion control plans, prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer, shall be submitted for review and approval by the Plan- nig and Public Works Departments prior to issuance of building permits in conjunction with installation of driveways, access easements or structures. This shall appear as a Note on the Final Map. 7. Plan and profile drawings of proposed individual driveways and driveway easements shall be submitted for approval by the Planning and Public Works Departments in order to determine average grade and appropriate improvement requirements. This shall appear as a 4 �d i Tentative Parcel Map 24-84 (Friend/Twin Cities Engineering) note on the final map. 8. One city standard fire hydrant shall be installed mid-way between the existing wharfheads at the end of Bella Vista. 9. All conditions herein specified shall be complied with prior to filing of the Final Map. 10. A final map drawn in substantial conformance with the approved tentative map and in compliance with all conditions set forth herein shall be submitted for review and approval in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City Lot Division Ordinance prior to recordation. a. Monuments shall be set at all new property corners created and a -registered civil engineer or licensed land surveyor shall indicate by certificate on the final map that corners have been set or will be set by a date specific and that they will be sufficient to enable the survey to be retraced. b. A recently updated preliminary title report shall be submit for review in conjunction with the processing of the Final Map. 11. Approval of this tentative parcel map shall expire two years from the date of Planning Commission approval unless an extension of time is granted pursuant to a written request prior to the expira- tion date. 5 t� Y uNS 6 AI LU ` y� 7 tk egg ' Sgt` NE • ti� X80 @ $ ! �' > ` 24 N o � q v 4 4 }. T ul LU X CL 111 {- u- g-7 to 45 to i g � a / O In 1 Y, aV o.r ' N) N E" ^ •?y 9 � 2 FXV� .[3 { 0 LOCA T- 10 N MAP 1-PM 2y- 8y tAAa ' Xsa 5 Cup tp\O ' ^ti 6-L � V-1 C. 0054'AoDf7.6 8 t 0 8805 61` va `�.; ° ' s� to 9io5 i A7-0 mai or ►3 7100 'l\`' i95' 4 11955 _ _ y j ;z ��`'� ' 9205 rs` 7-e P ► �t50 7-G �tiGO � 3 '�Co-G7-2ts coo � B 90 s 105, Q "IZpo 7399 98, v �05 P4 - - - - - - 9 S g y�D y� -7-+ 8.6; 'I1552T- 95 7, 1s55 8-A o 10-a '016 r_ q Z '9-6th Q -A :C-0x S4.21�5� �Q �ko / X12"��)0'� 5 9-k ,Jc 1 9 7 A 1 / o\ s 1 /, X12-A 9715 1 q 13 7Z 5 9g SS 4Y 4. ta5' 12 /1 Go�a-3os 5 895 /� \V( S 8 � t X150 15 3 INC" X605 7 ._ 14 co tr-3'tLO i FOR 16 & ti 8 17 , PPR Z 19 o3s �i 101 20 108 sb 102 ��BS 8] t00 ^-i 22 ^ 107 INx �� ,,•„�' 24 73 Pi7o5 6 �� / ` ^� /Y� ' 125 103 99 o� i 90 i ' �✓nn i �+� 26 „ T5 8-710105 104 �'� 970. �i,n�•e 3 , thp� 4i �^ `SSG r 96 r O 4 sn r »n ;1v 2 1 in 1 .�C1 EXHIB ( T D October 8 , 1984 Planning Commission Members City of Atascadero Subject : Tentative Parcel Map 24-84, to create three parcels on Bella Vista Road. Scheduled for Public Hearing 10-15-84. The two owners on Bella Vista whose property borders the entire NE boundary of the subject land wish to make the following comments and requests : (1 ) That the Planning Departments recommendation to allow two parcels rather than three be adopted. This seems reasonable in view of the character of the land. Also the adjacent property on Bella Vista Road is composed of a number of larger properties - 6 acres, 2.57 acres, 5 acres, 3. 10 acres and 4.25 acres. (2) The two property owners writing this letter, Jim Haun and Neils Lahrson, have recently paved 1200 feet of Bella Vista Road which includes the entire frontage of the subject property. We have also improved the road shoulder with plastic and 100 yards of rock. The total cost was $11 ,400. It is requested that the owner of the subject property (Douglas Friend) pay a fair share of the cost of this road improvement. (3) On Bella Vista there is a strip of dirt road (approximately 120 feet) . The base is cracked" and will sustain significant damage this winter which may make it impassable. It is requested that Douglas Friend pay a portion of the cost of making this paving improvement . (4) It is also requested that any parcels sold by Douglas Friend be subject to a simple road maintenance agreement. Co sts of repairs and maintenance to be shared equally by those using the road (5 ) It is requested that any ingress ramps off Bella Vista Road be in accordance with City of Atascadero standards . It is hoped that the Planning Commissioners will view the subject site from Bella Vista Road and the road improvements prior to the Public Hearing. t page 2. Thank you for your consideration of this request. S' cerely, aures J an 7950 B la Vista Road Atascadero, Ca 93423 466-34o3�, � I s ahrson 7 70 Bella Vista Road Atascadero , Ca 93422 '7 as G�Q�qPaC a, may. gg f i.- LQ a r v ar S�•10'45E Se9.� o-IN m in i v N r. f ^� � I ori` ii �W 1 i a --""monk _ a �� • OUNCIL MEETING: 12/10/84 AGENDA ITEM NO. : A - 4 • M E M O R A N D U M TO: CITY COUNCIL December 4, 1984 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 27-84 LOCATION: 5319 Honda (Lots 32, 33, Block DA) APPLICANT: David Marazzo/Ben Gage REQUEST: To create a one lot condominium tract containing eight dwelling units in the RMF-16 Zone. On December 3, 1984, the Planning Commission conducted a public hear- ing on the above matter unanimously (with Commissioners LaPrade and • Sherer absent) certifying a Negative Declaration and approving the application subject to the findings and conditions contained in the attached staff report. John Kennaly, representing the applicant, appeared and stated he was in agreement with the recommendation. No one else appeared on the matter . HENRY'ENGEN RALPH H. DOWELL JR. Planning Di ctor Acting City Manager Ps r City of Atascadero Item: B-4 STAFF REPORT "FOR: City Planning Commission Meeting Date: December 3, 1984 BY: Doug Davidson, Assoc. Planner Trainee File No: TTM27-84 Project Address: 5319 Honda (Lots 32,33, Block DA) SUBJECT: To create a one lot condominium tract containing eight dwelling units in the RMF-16 zone. BACKGROUND This item has a previous approval under Precise Plan 8-84. On October 24, 1984, this project was issued a building permit for a two-story eight unit apartment complex. The applicant now wishes to change the project to a one lot condominium tract. Public hearing notice was published in the Atascadero News on November 23 , 1984 and copies sent to all record property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. A. LOCATION: 5319 Honda (Ptn. Lots 32, 33, Block DA) B. SITUATION AND FACTS : 1. Request. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .To create a one lot condominium tract containing eight dwelling units in the RMF-16 zone. 2. Owner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .David Marazzo/Ben Gage 3. Engineer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .John Kennaly 4. Site Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Approximately .70 acre 5. Streets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Honda is a local street with a 40 foot right-of-way. 6 . Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .RMF/16 (Residential Multiple Family, 16 dwelling units per acre maximum) 7. Existing Use. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Vacant (building permits issued) 8. Adjacent Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . .North: RSF-Y South: RMF/16 East: RMF/16 West: RMF/16 Tentative Tract 1. 27-84 Marazz P ( o/Gage) 9. General Plan Designation. . . . .High Density Multiple Family Residential , 10. Terrain. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Gently sloping 11. Environmental Status. . . . . . . . .Negative Declaration to be cer- tified by Planning Commission C. SITE AND DEVELOPMENT DATA: 1. Site Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0. 7 acre 2. Required minimum lot size. . . . 0. 5 acre 3. Number of dwellings proposed: 8 units 4. Density. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Permitted: 16 dwelling units per acre Proposed 8 dwelling units on 0.7 acres. Parcel could possibly con- tain 11 units. D. ANALYSIS: With previousrecise plan P p approval and issued building permits, this item becomes a matter of ownership. The applicant desires to change the project from eight apartments to eight condominium units. This will allow individual ownership of a dwelling unit and common ownership of the parking and open space areas. Staff believes that this change from apartments to condominiums would not conflict with any plans or policies. E. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Tentative Tract Map 27-84 based on the following findings and conditions contained in Exhibit "A" . ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A - Findings and Conditions of Approval Location Map Site Plan DGD:ps 2 Tentative Tract Map 27-84 (Marazzo/Gage) EXHIBIT "A" - Tentative Tract Map 27-84 Findings and Conditions of Approval December 3, 1984 FINDINGS: 1. The application, as submitted, conforms to all applicable zoning and subdivision regulations and is consistent with the General Plan. 2. The project, as proposed, will not have a significant adverse ef- fect upon the environment and preparation of an Environmental Im- pact Report is not necessary. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The applicant shall establish Covenants, Conditions, and Restric- tions (CC&Rs) for the regulation of land use, control of nuisances and architectural control of all buildings. a. These CC&Rs shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Attorney and Planning Department prior to approval of the final map. b. These CC&Rs shall be administered by a Condominium Homeowners Association. 2. All conditions of approval herein specified are to be complied with prior to the filing of the final map. 3. A final map, in compliance with all conditions set forth herein, shall be submitted for review and approval in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and City Lot Division Ordinance prior to recordation. a. Monuments shall beset at all new property corners created and a registered civil engineer or licensed land surveyor shall indicate, by certificate on the final map, that corners have been set or shall be set by a date specific and that they will be sufficient to enable the survey to be retraced. b. A recently updated preliminary title report shall be submit- ted for review in conjunction with the processing of the final map. 4. The project shall conform to all conditions contained in Precise . Plan 8-84 as well as the approved building plans. 3 Tentative Tract Map•27-84 (Marazzo/Gage) • 5. Approval of this tentative tract map shall expire two years from the date of this approval unless an extension of time is granted pursuant to a written request prior to the expiration date. i M 4 � � r:� �� \�! , �.i1.�.3. alt' _Ci3..1:5.>•�L„e%4:.>:..F t:a.,y iL,t iC{Ci ltl r ,� lip.:. atx 1{ IF Ely to HO WPM N, •. - -s ,J �Jro>��`�;;yti�( <-�y a'`{.1pJ/�/' .�r\� -\ .1.f; .. .. - { • _ ' �,�� .,�/ �� f��a,i,r�s�~rF1- e, a{> '.c tay�\['S�d'\la`�%�'�tT��. Y �e ti\_..� _ e '• tr,. ,o r, r^' x'.. '��J'.y� row..qui_ , ��a:.,s, as \\ J ` t ,i, *le' •`.>Jis. ' L � - 7��sy.S =♦�� ,�? e''��'/��-� q .a nr`9 ,�•V��' �ca1�` \ i �,X Z��'"s o yy. "�Jj/rz�.s/ss�I. 'C;• I �� ri r�'Ir' 4.>� 1• Z/T 15r \ �� "'ef -"1' - .:'s T�-js �d y zo of y �'f`�t t,t3'T �� aL/� 6...r5W \� �s• \'": s5• lii+c re�,s_ - , ` .:�` � / 4t?�•_ _l'ss � Z/±:/ tr sa 3.n �5'I">\ �S o• A i M ss< t," s -_s�-(/r .. v.. J. ,/y+:� '�♦oo�6/�\ 7s HJT 1!' re.. .; ' � "�t`i•�+9r� lr� •Q.4gs�>"��(/ fee •sz�t�t' +� t;r\ _.er �� y Yom. � `-`•� r L +s , 4,: t „_ J • ZZ 1Sl o� tr?t i a'<�4�r "', 5`r ar ,y t♦ `a5•ti�J •� �>>�PZ•:'� \ 2 Jre•a '9�a r '3 ols/ '•s' z-J,�+,2 , rs• r•rr ., `�fT ,�b 1 " T.' -+4 t ;w 7, H . ( ``Tb./.'s ty'� `F'.C: '+sss "`-�_ .e 'ZS;oJ =t ��Lt\` •i•C�s� 'S _ J ft.s .aa-+•••N - •er✓L i,�,q S •jos ` J �/ s \,; R LY•r,w tta^:iY-� SA`- r ?/ti� >s,bi Q- +•,'�2- +.,�_v t 1 +6t >•t� ry ``'` �._�;�� yC i t �,�is. ` �1�' j>�•• sea' t ' ( / sT „ 2!. �C Y"G�4r..Y.ry�r �' Jr° yp/ lr 'Y.. ,4\�\ \�}�\ �2?��4Y -':e `/ � `p 5/. .`) .. •,a .D 0T 3,��:.<s•yr eRX �yra�'}i••� ��.., � �,, y , ,yS a�\�iP�t� afyo �E•. RSF_ - /r• � rt rF'>G,b 'Ts',`w• 1��:\-Yd L�z fayl ,'�°�'J f/C' 1 `� �•� cit\\ �si�� l,q�y.•ia - \�r G� ..�` � y/ .,, J zaa? z T'bJ ._SA��•-. f ,,•[\L/ -. /°.i -�tf a•.) L' ! �i` }'\ . \ °� �.4 49� -rte S.J,\.la•\.'Y' - '-" -01 r"�ar s` f�'> C' `/\} v JS •,�"C •,-:. - j �d ai. ,aO. „r_ rta.' is j =i=aCf .02>/„e��/� Y -�wT,i 1.6. j3,;�4' F\ a\.,•'��` � '`Y •�J,• �� } \ ^,`e s >m" �✓ _ r�Yt, r/.�,, [k;'� y rt T44[ Y v t s �� ` . ). ' � - tet* � � ?i'p •` szs }( 1_ 'sam sem.,-5' y.4"7�/ �`�`5`'J-r zs i� -t ;o .,� _ 3��r �N.- >t�v fJ' ,�• •S ai•V"t>r:+f ._�.. �lti:',r ti r� � !'F.V' 4Q .4 M 5f •' -` � .J C•`-�.i � 'alt t �• fa i9 :[ ) s(/J�, ('• � , _. \y`� r 'r�,�•7 i� ,f fir. � g` 4 Zo J4iP .,},�. � q:� - '� - ' � r ,// � .6'S- ar ` •/:oe to `ra�,�' gf�¢ R Si Jti'>'` a >„ �� >>/ .F•,?)�,�. . ,s4 'g.\t wa � >s f zos � .l� "� I 2^�8 '•�, - ;,Ry'� (/nio ',x�� r1� _ ,l„' - -.s � /,. `J�•„ ars Ir ,�/�, � q��w a� ^�.4, t� � s 74 ,r %• f•. R♦` '••�'a. .1"t'• /�2Ctn'. �4p' tJ �fl��i -eG. ..J, � I�.ct�:�� I� �.jd,�}p•a i2'` 4.>F s•�y/tea r?>``+- 3` 4 .;a a°+�'r'^ r 9e.:� �• t ,R^5 - stgo 4r, ,at '<?'^-�' i`sf 1(�\ ia y�„Y'bc' - - .,`,,r,.. '. c/�1Y•`� 0. .. vacsF 3r i t�4, t,.; I, � . o ,,. r': '�' .-,�,��• ;�3 �� \�,r''I1. `�' 4,r� /?'•� `4:s ,p ,>°;4 p, ro q •� stns ,� y91).r � `e a� '�� \ t � :'• ; A�yM, eve er J•• ' �S a 4 \ � It r 6,�a�.r,>u li a �� dtrZ��J �,r` v•+ f•' t �„T w~C/�H •�.4•'no :Ifs,,. soss •+o Ild5.: • R�•£I`Ta'�� s4> .'4 .... . •Ci�t”r L y '>`rt�,t �•' � . IP 1:.�� r9 •,T a, s. �/('��o\ a wY °-ala � ,o.�Y f'1 r„ ... soi:it 'z.v s ��I Sr rtf '9� Se' ± > i.:_.-• . t�s .�[+�. ��;"'� ��'f. x `•sy_ s°� r f �i r �,8 t s to< C .4�, ''.�`*�.�/ .. t Js �1" {�. ��•'k`x =J�'� t' Si'+ta I'Fs.o 5� lam _ !5,s° f\ '�Y,S)� - aC-/f/�;� .. , ..:.::;.� ns / •t v. F.�rp..-. .�f,7��,,, /.� ',•i �4 v-'�S sx� 1 e'!„,ti, vl' \..> 11 �;��< a•, oyCar �t'•r ��'`�` /u' r^,', �`�Sa �• s�`shs��i � :3•`v �'2�ij y �V/ �.(:-�'•y,n` ... - ..'4+-.! as 1 S- ��T)�. at i..• .A..s y �, I~'� �i�>i -i s2 5 j r ury q 7 /T 2 ,` '•r FT��lsrh>/J ,Ita� `}TY� \ ,�a,a Zti an>o �-� .: h,�/tri '��'�5,�—��%` �,r•�;� �,Fs;, Ita na -"i5�o r �zou -{, s,: ra "♦�'M ,' �J _ 31 -'``+io/ ••''P s�• + :iUz�- fiv f 1Az a sa !ax �, +1 tiU'a+\ °c' 19:. 40�Z' ,v�sL ,r .:_}L 1. �•sa. �„5�.. ,, ♦\%4>'ya�•.-7'vJ.� • ((((r /jam { � � � , a— � =IJ //fQl ,<r[- - ��i l�iS�rl ♦ ��IGI '1 �.iL .` H� L � a rrrow �)_ 5/ -T�f--'4, • 'CR rq. • ° , 'F1tT .•°R 5 � �.t�rz '�.j fti/ G Ira v; �i, t`�/>v i�� ;,,�,• ,Y/w b• \� \\��„ \�° �. a - ` RMF/16 ., - /\♦4 C r� .,<,t�a. .A'' '�. \J IJ•.',�• SSVS'�SY t_>,;-1rf =yam F/�`�``,�. _ r,�'+1 �� ) \/ �,�,up<dqi:,� ssr 1'3' .>-:> .,f_ /lu i�!r/•`�J _ . -•��'� /,yi�•�aF��,o1p«4 yo�ss� �zao ,.,yam. slf'er� ��,tj .4/ ! Ilitr { 3- �.. s•• - )t a �\�j ":i sea ��t1 �'f �;',� __ � .,G�4�__... t I , �� a"'�3J 1��i� 5:`�r '>i4,-\��=,. :�:. � �r a, z�i -�s as-a��•�; . . ` �O// P,l r�� µ'��$s•jY 9,K � ��,3�•a�•{St _•_.._ .I.__._-..;. '•.. , fb '\ rrf'�'�• =1-�'o"TTttfTt••T'. +T:i�-r'^ G<'�"F i`yu//'Si •L.C_�SF•�+e •sS..�; y�/'� <-'f_ ':1 '-�v\er a - <-;1^•': Vs.v> f -16 •v uer • �.r +rte�.•r',na �t�J.-...�.-� >;..,....,.. `a . Era .zl::c.� :• ,��,�.'t:. ..�. R1rF/o � Wo N 4 � a•o � r Z �i LU .4,,, M V) {.. Ln � � h 8 0 Q pv4 Rk-, h w cz � o N W - 2 2� I lop CITY COUNCIL MEETING December 10, 1984 WEEKLY REPORT AGENDA ITEM B.1 Material pertinent to STATUS OF BUILDING PERMIT PROCESSING 111. Planning Depart- ment Building- Permit Atascadero Planning Department Processing - Verbal Status Report by Planning Director" DATE: PLAN STATUS NO. WORKING ON COMMENTS Fir Site Inspection For Planning/Zoning Review* 16 In-house Plan Check - Outside Plan Check** 7 A011 Out for Corrections (to applicant) In for Recheck Ready for Issuance L TOTAL *May include Public Works, Fire Department, Caltrans and Health Department review. **Plans out to outside plan checkers: •"/.7�'1�i111�Y t cS-tl/Dil� / - is./r/�t�•-sem' .NOTE: Total number of building permits issued from to f�_rs 8y equals Deposits �3 "COMMENTS" R• SNall i arav .T % o or & -- e imov/ - PaTiv s G. [Q-��v�ina.S� �^,�o«Tra�r -8��/YP +FPitlJ�ir il,•s ,C3a/ Tn T�r rr. HENRY ENGEN ICHARD DeLAUDER .._.,,Planning. . ,. Dire for Chief Building Inspector y "° .ice ..a: .r fi f-.: .Fat ,j 1` t '� `. .-,c''w.," 1r...c�Y 4 ^'�gaw, `., �� „�.,n..��it^•,[.y°s�-�"�� ,w,, y_e�.srivR.rysk.�g�v."wr�se:.ry4`m nM'.r>n.esE1y;IrF.'es..K>e,6`�tY°Rn^'sr'y.ss',fi3c>3f�<fii!�a'xpR•_sT.r��_+Yr..!eiw-h'vene».»la:Il+we'#*ai.F,M.a�r•zCvFS+w.a'IstF+-#c.rxiF`r�'++4t ��#tSs+"w'.,`'�us e`'"3 r�':'.0"�cfVN��.'y#^s,++�wt'"u,�.-w-qR,'�P,#r4^,M1Y'L+.ri�.w.&+".g �,,,O$:...�?"3��:fl.«n9.1�p�d'Ari'�;:i''i�bs'Ks?."=rr`,e.l':-"5k.°p.-}Yza*•1'.tit '�YtlY4't'e+<t:cryS's''4¢u^�.Ajr3liKE'MM.�"7R' sfF'4`�_,. > �s-r 1. "�.^ 4 svre•�x�A,, �-3 x+� _ .,y' tress•*w.-++ow.;g.rr+ wegy�"' �w�rprh¢" $ - .ts.'�•_.,ss�,x.,' +~.._....».d" ^`fit` :.t..a.,:: mti, -` `-" F,ic'2 f •.��:�'+-.nrc;�e+�Vv�s +axa:�..'"t�aei.*�-`:r,- '�v�.".,.. Fv"ai�; . CITY OF ATASCADERO PLANNING DEPARTMENT -ORGANIZATION- CITY MANAGER PLANNING DIRECTOR Henry Engen -BUILDING DIVISION- -PLANNING DIVISION CHIEF BUILD. INSP. ASSOCIATE PLANNER Richard DeLauder Joel Moses ENGR. PLAN CHECKASSOCIATE TRAINEE Cal Fernandes Doug Davidson BUILDING INSP. INTERN John -� John Miller P2ike Wixon BUILDING INSP. Phil Wachtel L. CLERICAL ASST.II Deborah Cini. DEPT SEC. Patricia Shepphard CLERICAL ASST.II Margaret Morris - PERMANENT I- - - PART TIME �OUNCIL MEETING: 12/10/84 AGENDA ITEM NO, : C - 1: • M E M O R A N D U M 2� TO: Acting City Manager_ FROM: Consulting City Engineer SUBJECT: Installation of Sidewalks along E1 Camino Real in accordance with Section 5870 of the Streets and Highways Code. DATE: December 4, 1984 On several different occasions Mr. Elliott Stephenson has approached the City in regard to the possibility of installing sidewalks along El Camino Real in those areas where there are currently no improvements. In researching the matter there are several procedures by which the City can require the installation of the improvements. The usual procedure is for frontage improvements to be required at the time that a develop- ment plan or building permit is requested such that the amount of the proposed site improvements exceed 25% of the existing improvements. These procedures are set down in Section 9-4.159 et seq. of the City • Code. The other procedure to which Mr. Stephenson was referring to is where the City determines the necessity for installing these improve- ments in accordance with Section 5870 et seq. of the Streets and Highways Code, commonly called the "Short Form Assessemnt District Procedure". However, there are certain requirements and findings that are necessary for the City to make. The improvements must be considered on a block by block basis and can only be required where improvements currently exists along 50% of the frontage of a block. A block is defined as each side of the street between intersections or, alternatively, in lengths of 1000` . The City, after it make a deter- mination that the improvements are needed, would direct the property owner or the party having possession of the property to install the improvements within a given period of time. A public hearing is re- quired and at that hearing, the Council must hear protests from all of those persons affected. The Council may override these protests by a four fifths vote and decide to go ahead with the project. If the property owner refuses to install the improvements the City must solicite bids to install the improvements and recover the costs by either placing a lein against the property or collect the costs with the property tax payment. Bonds can be sold to pay for the improvements if so desired. To my knowledge, and in checking with Larry McPherson, this • procedure has never been used in the City of Atascadero although other cities have used it. ADMINISTRATION BUILDING CITY ATTORNEY POST OFFICE BOX 747 POST OFFICE BOX 749 ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA 93423 ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA 93423 PHONE: (805( 466-8000 PHONE: (805) 466-5678 CITY COUNCIL '-"'r• CITY CLERK dalftc dem& POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY TREASURER CITY MANAGER INCORPORATED JULY 2, 1979 POST OFFICE BOX 747 ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA 9 FINANCE DEPARTMENT PHONE: (805) 466-8600 PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT «+ PLANNING DEPARTMENT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT RECREATION DEPARTMENT 6005 LEWIS AVENUE ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA 93422 +� PHONE: (805) 466-2141 MEMORANDUM November 15, 1984 To: Ralph Dowell, Acting City Manager From: Alden Grimes, City Attorney d"t-j Subject: Sidewalks: Council Request for Staff Study of Mandatory Construction of Sidewalks on El Camino Real This is a note to advise you that there are legal ramifications involved in Elliott Stephenson's recommendation for the Council to adopt an ordinance making construction of sidewalks on both sides of E1 Camino Real mandatory. The recommended ordinance would not be valid, as it would deprive the property owners in violation of their constitutional protections. Sidewalks can be required under the provisions of H 5470-5895.54 of the Streets and Highways Code, the Improvement Act of 1911. These provisions set forth the procedure. Basically, they provide that where more than half of the sidewalks are constructed in one "block" on either side of the street, the remaining property owners can be required through the specified procedure to construct sidewalks fronting their properties. The procedure provides for the time and place for a hearing by objectors and protesters, but the act gives the Council the power to overrule such objections and protests by an affirmative vote of a majority of its members. I assume that you will be asking Mr. Wallace as well as Mr. Engen for a report on the subject. AG:fr cc: Acting Public Works Director Henry Engen, Planning Director Sidewalks/ECR page two In reviewing the portion of El Camino Real spoken to by Mr. Stephenson and discussing the matter with the Planning Depart- ment I find that there are a number of vacant sites that are currently in the development process and that will be providing these improvements within the next six months or years` time. Therefore I would recommend that the City temporarily table con- sideration of this method of installing improvements at this time and do a more complete analysis to see where there is no development planned and therefore where gaps in the frontage improvements would continue to exist for some time to come. If it is your desire, we will conduct such a study and return with the information at a future date. J9? 1, ,' WALLACE JW:vh cc: Allen Grimes Henry Engen • QbUNCIL MEETING: 12/10/84 AGENDA ITEM NO. : C-2 M E M O R A N D U M t� TO: Acting City Manager—1,; CC FROM: Consulting City Engineer SUBJECT: Project Status: Renovation of Administration Building Phase II DATE: December 3, 1984 In the week of November 26th I met with the engineer regarding the engineer's estimate for the renovation of the Administration Building - Phase II. As you know, the engineer's estimate for the complete project was in the neighborhood of $350,000 and our budgeted funds currently are $279,000. Since that time we considered different alternatives for reducing the scope of the project to come within ® the available funds. We have now done so and have eliminated several items and will be asking for bids on a line item basis in order to achieve the maximum project available with the available funds. The main item eliminated was the air conditioning for the first and second floors and the associated electrical work that would go along with that phase of the project. Because the architect and the engineer need time to modify the Plans before we go out to bid, I have had to revise the schedule for processing the project. The project schedule is as follows: advertise for bids December 12, 1984, pre-bid meeting to discuss the project with potential bidders and to answer any questions regarding the project, January 10, 1985, bids received January 17, 1985. We will keep you updated after the pre-bid meeting in order to let you know if there are any serious concerns on the part of the potential bidders regarding this project. �j WOHNALLACE JW:vh • • COIL MEETING: 12/10/84 AGENDA ITEM NO. : D - 1 M E M O R A N D U M i TO: City Council December 10 , 1984 FROM: Ralph H. Dowell, Jr. g�D Acting City Manager SUBJECT: CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 24, 1984 In reviewing the work load for the remainder of the month, it appears practical to cancel the second Council meeting scheduled for December 24, 1984. The next scheduled date, per the Code, would be Christmas, which - is a legal City holiday; therefore, the most logical date for a meeting would become Wednesday, December 26th. I see no problems in meeting our commitments, even with the • cancellation of this scheduled meeting. If you concur, I will coordinate the necessary notices with the City Clerk. RHD:kv • COUNCIL MEETING: 12/10/84 �GENDA ITEM NO, : D-2 M E M O R A N D U M TO: City Council December 10 , 1984 FROM: Ralph H. Dowell, Jr. Acting City Manager SUBJECT: PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR RECRUITMENT A committee, composed of Councilmen Molina and Handshy and myself, conducted a screening of 35 applications for the position of Public Works Director on December 4, 1984. We selected 9 applicants who met our criteria, and are recommend for further consideration. We have established a Technical Review Committee, composed of Larry Mc Pherson, John Wallace, and Nick Nichols (Morro Bay Public Works Director) , who will interview these 9 candidates on Saturday, December 15th. This Committee will then present Council with a list of the most highly qualified applicants for final interview. • It is proposed that Council conduct an oral board on Saturday, January 5, 1985. All candidates have been advised, by telephone, of this schedule and the requirement of possibly returning for final interview on January 5th, if so selected. Assuming we have cancelled the second Council meeting in December , per Item D-1 above, it is recommended that this Council Meeting be adjourned to the January 5th Oral Board. I will coordinate with the City Clerk for proper notice. RHD:kv • • IROUNCIL MEETING : 12/10/84 AGENDA ITEM No, : D - 3 M E M O R A N D U M TO: City Council December 10 , 1984 FROM: Ralph H. Dowell, Jr. e( Acting City Manager SUBJECT: DIAL-A-RIDE GOOD WILL PROMOTION - DECEMBER 17-21, 1984 The attached letter from the San Luis Obispo County Area Transit proposes a county-wide Good Will Program during December 17-21, which permits all riders during this period the option of paying their fare by donating canned food instead of the normal fare box .cost. The total expense to the City for the entire period should not exceed' $100. Arrangements have been made for picking up the donated items, and all those received by our system will be donated in our area. It is my recommendation that we participate in this program. RHD:kv Attachments • LAO • pLCALDES 1850 H 0 LUIS OBISPO COUHTY OUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER • SAN LUIS OBISPO,CALIFORNIA 93408 • (805)549-5252 GEORGE C. PROTOPAPAS County Engineer CLINTON MILNE DEPUTY COUNTY ENGINEER GUY PREWITT COUNTY SPECIAL DISTRICTS ADMINISTRATOR ENGINEERING November 20, 1984 DEPARTMENT ROADS TRANSPORTATION Mr. Ralph Dowell , Acting City Administrator FLOOD CONTROL City of Atascadero WATER CONSERVATION 6500 Palma Street COUNTY SURVEYOR Atascadero, CA 93422 SPECIAL DISTRICTS Subject : November 16, 1984 Phone Conversation: Christmas Cheer from Public Transit Operators and the Salvation Army Dear Mr. Dowell : For the first time San Luis Obispo County transit operators will be participating in a goodwill promotion December 17 through December 21 . The proposal is that anyone can board a bus and ride free when they contribute a can of food for the needy in that service area. So far, San Luis Transit, SLOCAT, North Coastal Transit and South Say Dial-A-Ride have agreed to work together for this promotion. South County Area Transit and Morro Say Dial-A-Ride will present this proposal to their respective Councils for their approval . The Salvation Army has agreed to collect and distribute the .food to the needy in each service area. Their guidelines for food are canned main dishes, vegetables, fruits and juices . Only commercially canned food will be accepted. They cannot accept home canned goods , anything in jars, cardboard boxes or plastic bags . The purpose of this promotion is to help our needy in this time of goodwill. We will be holding a news conference and mailing news releases on December 13th to announce this promotion. Newspaper ads and public service announcements will also be placed. We genuinely hope that Atascadero Dial-A-Ride will join in making this a County-wide Christmas promotion. I �i If you have any questions , please call the Wesharing Manager Sallie Francis at 541-2277. Sincerely, GEORGE C. PROTOPAP Couqtyn eer i RICHAR RANDIS Transit Supervisor San Luis Obispo County Area Transit RR/nt �ti • 1110UNCIL MEETING: 12/10/84 AGENDA ITEM No. : D - 4 M E M O R A N D U M TO: City Council December 10 , 1984 FROM: Ralph H. Dowell, Jr. f�ttLD Acting City Manager SUBJECT: BID NUMBER 84-18 - DIAL-A-RIDE VAN I have reviewed this bid with Mr. Leib, and even though we received only one (1) bid, it is considered reasonable for the type of equipment desired, which includes handicapped accessibility. The maximum amount of Section 18 Grant money available is, as stated, $22,717. We have in our existing budget $6 ,500 in matching funds, therefore, we require an additional $6,962.90 to complete this transaction. This grant was proposed and submitted over two (2) years ago and consequently there have been price adjustments plus inflation since the original estimate; however , we are presently obtaining a • $36,179 .90 piece of equipment for a total cost to the City of $13,462. 90 I feel it is necessary that we continue with the van replacement program, as projected, in order to insure that we maintain a proper level of equipment for our Dial-A-Ride system. I recommend your approval of the above referenced bid and transfer of $6,962.90 from the Contingency Reserve to Account 01-40-3274. • • M E M O R A N D U M TO: Acting City Manager FROM: Public Works Superintendent SUBJECT: Bid 4684-18 - Dial A Ride Van DATE: December 5, 1984 On Monday, December 3, 1984 at 2:00 p.m. bids were received and opened for the purchase of a new bus for our Dial A Ride pro- gram. The only company submitting a bid was the Wide One Corpora- tion. Their bid was $36,179.90. A Section 18 Grant was previously applied for and approved by the State Urban Mass Transportation Administration to supplement the purchase of this bus. The amount approved was $22,717. Also, $6,500 in matching funds was approved for this purchase in the F.Y. 1984/85 budget. It is my recommendation that we ask Council to approve a transfer of $6,962.90 from Contingency Reserves and proceed to purchase the bus as quoted. DON LEIB DL:vh ROUNCIL .MEETING: 12/10/84 AGENDA ITEM NO. ; D - 5 • M E M O R A N D U M TO: CITY COUNCIL December 10, 1984 VIA: RALPH H. DOWELL, JR. , Acting City Manager FROM: HENRY ENGEN, Planning Director RE: Request for City Council Discussion Re: Special Exception to General Plan .Concept Councilwoman Norris has requested that the concept of permitting the granting of special exception permits from general plan/zoning be dis- cussed. This matter was the subject of discussion early in 1983 and not approved. The new Zoning Ordinance was approved in July, 1983 which provides a variety of means to modify the literal development standards of the Zoning Ordinance by way of conditional use permit approval. This item is placed on the agenda for discussion and guidance to staff. C HENRY ENGE RALPH H. DOWELL, JR. Planning Director Acting City Manager HE:ps • COUNTY SANITAT116 DISTRICT MTG: 12/10/84 AGENDA ITEM No. : E-1 • M E M O R A N D U M TO: City Council December 10, 1984 FROM: Ralph H. Dowell, Jr.'zt77-' Acting City Manager SUBJECT: PROPOSED ORDINANCE 95 - AMENDING SECTION OF ORDINANCE 54 REGARDING SEWER SERVICE CHARGES TO RESTAURANTS Attached is Ordinance 95 for the scheduled SECOND READING. • • M E M O R A N D U M TO: Acting City Manager FROM: Consulting City Engineer SUBJECT: Ordinance Amending Sewer Charge Rates DATE: November 20, 1984 As you know Barbara Lehmann appealed existing sewer charges for the Nardoni Pizza Restaurant in the city at the last Council meeting on November 13, 1984. At that time we indicated that we had been con- sidering a revision in the sewer rates for restaurants and a regrouping of these rates based upon seating capacity different from what the County had determined in 1976. At the present time there are only two classi- fications lassi-fications and rates for restaurants: for restaurants with 40 seats or less the rate is $74.58 per month, and for restaurants with more than 40 seats the rate is $178.89. A new proposed rate structure is shown in the attached ordinance for your information and for consideration by the City Council. The proposed rate structure, we believe, is more fair than that currently in place, and even though it will not generate as much annual revenue as presently being generated, it will still be in accordance with the revenue program approved by the State for the grant that was used to finance the project in 1984. We will continue to review other classifications in the rate structure and bring these to the Council's attention for further action, if necessary, at a later time. JOHN WALLACE JW:vh �n • ATASCADERO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO STATE OF CALIFORNIA ORDINANCE NO. 95 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 10 OF ORDINANCE 54 REGARDING SEWER SERVICE CHARGES The Board of Directors of the Atascadero County Sanitation Dis- trict does ordain as follows: Section 1. That Section 10 of Ordinance 54, Sections 11.1 (h) and 11.1 (i) of the Atascadero County Sanitation District Ordinance Code, is amended to read as follows: Section 11.1 (h) (i) Restaurants/ 40 seats or less $ 74.58 (ii) Restaurants/ 41 - 60 seats 109.35 (i) (i) Restaurants/ 61-100 seats 144.12 (ii) Restaurants/ more than 100 seats 178.89 Section 2. The District Secretary shall cause this Ordinance to be published once within fifteen (15) days after its passage in the Atascadero News, a newspaper of general circulation, printed, published and circulated in this District; shall certify the adoption and publi- cation of this Ordinance; and shall cause this ordinance and its certification to be entered in the Book of Ordinances of this District. Section 3. This Ordinance shall go into effect and be in full force and effect at 12:01 on the thirty-first (31st) day after passage. The foregoing ordinance was introduced, adopted and ordered pub- lished at a meeting of the District Board of Directors held on by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ROLFE NELSON, President Ordinance No. - Sewer Charges ATTEST: .F,ALPH H. DOWELL, Jr. , Acting Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: ALLEN GRIMES, City Attorney APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: OL L JOILVWALLACE, Acting City Engineer i i ('C�