HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 02/14/1984 AGENDA ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL
10egular Meeting
ebruary 14, 1984 7:30 p.m.
tascadero Administration Building
Call to Order
Pledge of Allegiance
Invocation
Roll Call
PRESENTATION TO MEMBERS OF THE ATASCADERO GREYHOUNDS
Public Comment
City Council Comments
A. CONSENT CALENDAR
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Item A, Consent Calendar, are :considered
to be routine and will be enacted by one motion in the form listed
below. There will be no separate, discussionof these items. If dis-
cussion is required, that item will be removed from the Consent Calen-
dar and will be considered separately. Vote may be by roll call. -f
1. Minutes of the regular meeting of January 23, 1984
(RECOMMEND APPROVAL)
2. Treasurer 's Report 1/1/84 to 1/31/84 (RECOMMEND APPROVAL)
3. Finance Director ' s Report l/1/84 to 1/31/84 (RECOMMEND
APPROVAL)
4. Correction of clerical errors to _ Treasurer' s and Finance
Director' s Reports for 12/1/83 to 12/31/83. (RECOMMEND
APPROVAL)
5. Lot Line Adjustment 2-83, 9185 Santa Lucia and 6055 Flores
(Ptn. Lots 14 and 53, Block 15) , J.C. and Esther Viera
William McNamara, D.J. Jeffres, Fred Foss (Greathouse) to
adjust property lines to remedy the encroachment of an exist-
ing swimming pool onto an adjacent lot (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION)
6. Tentative Parcel Map 17=83, Laurel Road (Ptn. Lot 3, Block
41) , I.D.M. Enterprises (Twin Cities Engineering) to allow
division of 72.7 acres into four parcels with three of 7
acres and one of the 51.7 acres (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION)
• 7. Tentative Parcel Map 19-83, 8600 San Marcos Road (Ptn. Lot 1
Block 15) , A.I. Jones (Hilliard Surveys) to divide 3. 11 acres
into two parcels of 1.61 and 1.5 acres (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION)
8. Notice of Completion - A.J. Diani Construction Co. Inc. , 'Bid
No. 83-8 (RECOMMEND APPROVAL)
-9. 1983/84 Local Transportation and State Transit Claims -
/
Request for Council approval in order to receive funds
(RECOMMEND APPROVAL)
B. HEARINGS, APPEARANCES, AND REPORTS
1. Request by ;City of San Luis Obispo to endorse a resolution
to obtain the League: of California Cities support_ for consti-
tutional amendments to allow local government greater control
over annexation, subdivision proposals.
2. Public Hearing on Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment 2-83,
initiated by Planning Commission, to add "Indoor Recreation"
to uses allowed within the IP (Industr'ial Park) and CPK'
(Commercial Park) Zoning District
3. Public Hearing on Ordinance No. 76 Changing certain
property on Lakeview Drive from L (Recreation) to RSF-Y:
(Residential Single Family) first reading
C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Revised Capital Improvement Plan Further Consideration
2. Reconsideration of Advisory Measure regarding Police Facility
D. NEW BUSINESS
1. Resolution No. 8-84 establishing hearing dates for forming
the Maintenance District for San Fernando Road
2. Recommendations regarding Unmet Transportation Needs. To be
considered at next Area Planning and Coordinating
Council meeting:
E. ATASCADERO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
(Council will recess and convene as the Atascadero "County Sanita-
tion District Board of Directors)
1. Resolution No. 11-84 approving sewer extension 1-84 extending
public sewer service to certain lots in the Hermosillo Avenue
area.
(The Board of Directors will adjourn and reconvene as City
Council)
F. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION
1. City Council
2. City Attorney
3. City Clerk
4. City Treasurer
5. City Manager
WENa AGENDA
10INUTES - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL
egular Meeting
anuary 23, 19$4
Atascadero Administration Building
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Mackey at 7:30 p.m.
Reverend Bert Young of the Gospel Chapel gave the invocation. Mayor
Mackey introduced Boy Scout Troop 176 and Scout Masters Marty Latimer
and Joel Moses and read a Proclamation designating February 5th
through llth as Boy Scout Week. The Boy Scouts presented the colors
and the lead the Pledge of Allegience.
The Scout members presented each Councilman with a small Universal
Civilian Pin to be worn at the Scout' s Backpack and Campout next week-
end. Mr. Latimer gave a brief report on the activities of the Boy
Scouts in the community of Atascadero. He commented that Scouting is
growing in Atascadero and felt that the Scouts were well guided by the
registered adults. Mayor Mackey thanked the Scouts for their present-
ation.
ROLL CALL
Present: Councilmen Molina, Nelson, Stover, Wilkins, and Mayor
Mackey
Obsent: None
STAFF
Present: Murray Warden, City Manager; Ralph Dowell, Finance Director;
Allen Grimes, City Attorney; Mike Hicks, Fire Chief; Skip`
Joannes, Recreation Director Bud McHale, Police Chief;
Larry McPherson, Public Works Director; Barbara Norris, City
Clerk; Steve Rizzuto, City Treasurer; Sandra Sans, Secretary
to the City Manager, and Larry Stevens, Planning Director.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None
COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilman Molina brought up the fact that February 13, 1984
would be a holiday and was interested in postponing the meeting until
the 15th so that all staff would be present. Mr. Warden stated that
the ordinance called for the meeting to automatically go to Tuesday.
Mr. Grimes stated that he would be able to attend the evening meeting
on that Tuesday, therefore, Councilman Wilkins suggested that ordi-
nance be followed.
Minutes - Atascadero A Council - January 23; A
B. HEARINGS, APPEARANCES AND REPORTS
1. Consideration of the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP)
Mr. Warden presented -a draft CIP for the years 1984 through
1989. He indicated that this document is extensive in ;that it pro-
vides a .point of comparison as to what might be , done to reach the
goals which Council established in terms of building a police
facility. He emphasized that this is merely a' guideline. It is based
upon assumptions that the revenue base will increase 7% per year and
that personnel costs will go up 5% per year. He explained that
Council could change any 'set of assumptions in order to accomplish the
goals which have been set or might be set in the future. He emphasized
that the CIP affords an opportunity to analyze the impact of certain
actionson both revenue and expenditures for all departments.
Mr. Warden stated that personnel increases have not been con-
sidered in the CIP. He also emphasized that it is' a five year pro-
jection and that it gives staff and others in the City an idea of what
might be accomplished and in what time frame they might ; be accomp-
lished. Mr. Warden stated that it is used as a starting point for the
annual budget. He also stated that there is no way of knowing what
might happen as far as legislation changing the revenue or ' expenditure
outlook.
Councilman Nelson referred to a particular motion in a previous
meeting regarding a placement of $300,000 in the budget for the police
facility in the 1983/84 year. He also stated that after reviewing the
CIP, he understands it to be that the City cannot afford to build a
police facility until 1988/89. Mr. Warden confirmed Councilman
Nelson' s assumption, based upon the analysis provided. ;
MOTION: Councilman Wilkins moved to adopt Program A of the CIP
on the grounds that this document was not permanent and could
be changed at any time to reflect other ideas that might be
appropriate.. The motion was seconded by Councilman Stover,
but was ' not< passed with Councilman Nelson, Molina and Mayor
Mackey voting no.
MOTION: Councilman Nelson moved to place this item on the next
Agenda. The motion was seconded by `Councilman Molina and
unanimously carried.'
2. Departmental Report Fire Department
Mike Hicks presented the Fire Department report to the Council.
He indicated that in 1983 the department had 1,036 calls for emer-
gency compared to the 946 calls in the previous year. He also stated
that the average response time for 1983 was 3 minutes and 14 seconds.
He reported on the EMT training program and that there are 16 EMT
trained employees. He also stated that the Department was given $1100
from the Kiwanis Club for the CPR class.
3
Minutes - Atascadero Cio Council - January 23, 190
The Council commented that it was a good report and commended
*he Department on the excellent response time.
C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Ordinance No. 75 - Amending the Text of Title 9 (Zoning
Regulations) Concerning Arcades
MOTION: Councilman Wilkins moved to read Ordinance No. 75 by title
only. The motion was seconded by Councilman Nelson and unani-
mously carried.
Mayor Mackey read Ordinance No. 75 by title only.
MOTION: Councilman Wilkins moved to adopt Ordinance No. 75. The
motion was seconded by Councilman Stover and unanimously car-
ried by roll call vote.
D. NEW BUSINESS
1. Resolution 10-84 placing one (1) measure on the ballot for
the General Municipal Election to be held on June 5, 1984
(Election Code Section 5353) and amending Resolution No.
3-84
Mr. Warden stated that this resolution amends Resolution No. 3-84
by adding Advisory Measure A which reads "Shall the City of Atascadero
construct a new police facility at an approximate cost of $700,000
using voter approved financing" to the ballot for the June election.
There was some discussion regarding the wording of the Advisory
Measure. Mr. Warden stated that the Advisory Measure will be placed
on the ballot as "ADVISORY ONLY" and the Council has the final say as
to whether the the police facility will be built or not. Mayor Mackey
said she would like to find out how the people feel about a new police
facility. The issue of where the money would come from could be placed
on the November ballot.
MOTION: Councilman Wilkins moved to adopt Resolution No. 10-84.
The motion was seconded by Councilman Nelson and carried
unanimously on a roll call vote.
2. Resolution No. 7-84 authorizing City Attorney to institute a
civil action in the name of the City against C. Sanchez &
Sons to recover damages to a city bridge and city vehicle as
a result of an incident which occurred on October 8, 1982
4
Minutes - Atascadero C& Council - January 23, 1
MOTION: Councilman Molina moved to adopt Resolution No. 7-84. The
motion was seconded by Councilman Wilkins and unanimously
carried by roll call vote.
3. Resolution No. 6-84 commending the Atascadero Greyhounds as
CIF 1983 Desert-Mountain Conference Football Cham ions
MOTION: Councilman Molina moved to adopt Resolution No. 6-84. This
motion was seconded by Councilman Wilkins and unanimously
carried by roll call vote.
4. Request from Recreation Department for a Transfer of Funds
from Contingency in the amount of $1000 to cover costs of
sending Park and Recreation Advisory Board members to Annual
Recreation Conference in San Diego, March 9-12
MOTION: Councilman Molina moved to approve the transfer of funds
in the amount of $1000 to the Recreation Department budget to
cover costs of sending Park and Recreation Advisory Board
members to the Annual Recreation Conference. The motion was
seconded by Councilman Stover and unanimously approved by
roll call vote.
5. Request for Transfer of Funds from Contingency for $900 to
cover costs of establishing lot corners on the Lakeview Pro-
perty, Lots No. 43,44, and 45.
Mr. McPherson, Public Works Director, explained that Lots
40 and 41 would also be included.
MOTION: Councilman Wilkins moved to approve the transfer of funds
in the amount of $900 to cover costs of establishing lot
corners on Lakeview Lots No. 40,41,43,44, and 45. This
motion was seconded by Councilman Molina and unanimously
carried by roll call vote.
E. ATASCADERO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
None
F. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION
1. City Council
Mayor Mackey stated that she has received a request from a
man in Oakland who collects flags, and it is his desire to obtain one
from the City of Atascadero. Mayor Mackey stated that he intends to
display his flag collection in San Francisco at the Democratic
Convention. It was suggested that this request be turned over to the
Democratic Club.
5
Minutes - Atascadero City Council -January 23, 1984
2. City Attorney
None
3. City Clerk
Barbara Norris introduced Sandra Sans, the City Managers
Secretary, who was taking the minutes for the meeting.
Mrs. Norris also reminded Council that the opening date
for filing nominations in the upcoming election was February 14 and
the closing is March 9.
4. City Treasurer
None
4. City Manager
Mr. Warden reminded Council that the Channel Counties
meeting will be held in Ventura on the 17th of February.
He also informed Council that the "March on the Capitol"
is scheduled for February 28.
Mr. Warden briefly discussed a personnel matter regarding
Oworkers compensation issue and sought a council indication of
ttempting to utilize disability retirees in constructive city employ-
ment rather than automatically retiring them. The Council indicated
its desire to attempt to create useful constructive employment oppor-
tunities as an alternative to automatic retirement.
Mr. Warden discussed the issue of an injured police officer
and stated that the City is making every attempt to place this officer
into a light duty assignment.
Council adjourned to closed session at 9 :00 p.m. and returned to
regular session at 10 : 15 p.m. , at which time they adjourned.
Recorded by:
BARBARA NORRIS, CITY CLERK
6
MEEVN G AG�NDA
g,4 ITEM
CITY OF ATASCACERO
• TREASURER'S REPORT
JANUARY 1, 1984 TO JANUARY 31, 1984
RECEIPTS
TAXES
Property Tax 4,442.35
Cigarette Tax 5,202.76
Motor Vehicle "In Lieu" 35,491.70
Sales & Use 60,000.00
Occupancy Tax 12,519.06
Homeowners Relief 20,840.52
Business Inventory 3,107.33
LICENSES/PERMITS/FEES 23,960.00
GAS TAX 16,334.08
TRAFFIC SAFETY 5,919.76
RECREATION FEES 21,508.70
RETURNED FROM LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND
AND MATURED TIME DEPOSITS 270,000.00
INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS 32,498.72
TRANSPORTATION SB-325 -0-
REVENUE SHARING 43,532.00
MISCELLANEOUS
Rents/Concessions 154.61
Sale Maps/Publications/Reports 383.45
Special Police Services 42.00
Fines & Penalties 811.98
Dial-A-Ride Farebox 1,980.95
Bails/Bonds 802.00
Reimbursement to Expense 6,455.42
Refund Unemployment Deposit 3,463.54
Rebates 303.19
Refunds 2,870.35
P.O.S.T. Reimbursement 1,032.51
Maintenance Districts 7,252.00
Weed Abatement 3,894 25
Miscellaneous 2,492.00
TOTAL $ 569,295.23
1
•
CITY OF ATASCADERO
TREASURER'S REPORT
JANUARY 1, 1984 TO JANUARY 31, 1984
INVESTMENTS
LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND 935,000.00
TIME DEPOSIT, SANTA BARBARA SAVINGS
11.00% INTEREST, MATURES 06/15/83 100,000.00
TIME DEPOSIT, CITICORP SAVINGS
10.125% INTEREST, MATURES 01/22/85 100,000.00
TIME DEPOSIT, CENTURY FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN
10. 25% INTEREST, MATURES 01/24/85 100,000.00
TOTAL INVESTMENT DEPOSITS 1,235,000.00
Steven M. Rizzu t&loTreasurer
. 2
• M T Ar'-zNDA
CITY OF ATASCADERO
FINANCE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
• JANUARY 1, 1984 TO JANUARY 31, 1984-
BALANCE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1983 220,813,82
DEPOSITED BY TREASURER, SEE RECEIPTS,
TREASURER'S REPORT, PAGE 1 569,295. 23`
TOTAL 790,109 .05
HAND CHECK REGISTER DATED 01/31/84 431,069.00
CHECK REGISTER DATED 01/12/84 148,387.83
CHECK REGISTER DATED 01/23/84 32,634.30
CHECK REGISTER DATED 01/25/84 11,814.87
CHECK REGISTER DATED 01/30/84 65,032.26
EXPENSE LISTING 95,779.11
TOTAL 784 ,717.37
BALANCE AS OF JANUARY 31, 1984 5,391.68
PETTY CASH 200.00
TREASURY INVESTMENTS
• SEE TREASURER REPORT, PAGE 2 1,235,000.00
TOTAL $1,240, 591.68
I,RALPH H. DOWELL JR. , do hereby certify and declare that
demands enumerated and referred to in the foregoing register
are accurate and just claims against the City and that there
are funds available for payment thereof in the City Treasury.
Dated: February 6, 1984
Ralph H. Dowell, Jr.
Finance Director
fMrray L. Warden
anager 3
•
( E _i ( t i t l iCA Cj
C.5
I� .+ .',;. •i„ V CII .:.t.tea ti..,..+. :> .'>y 3J-, I
i i !
�•t £7 Z _x£
ji
m.7-...q
17
CD
. Q o Q — �+.•> .,+, ;;�.C>`i '3.moi `.'3 _ T r J y ..w "� "'
r a
i.. i i i. ! F z i E ! 3 S i i J i �. 3 ,"•; J
^_ r ^3 v 7 Q.^'1 a a v� ,= a Q ... ^r Q'� ^,p �a Q •'_,. ,s
' Q'�. "..i• w .ter Q Q^+.�.+Q ry^J �+. .�Q.�Q^.• a"�• .'�-'�.^^."�.:Q^.+a Q _.. v \
a J 'a? t - _sa J 1 -0 ..+. ^� .:,:*3 J .3 .S" .i PJ `�?:.'1 3' �.�. .Z a 70:%,
.>
i i ,f.:F i ': i iY.t i ! ! i:'j ! s iti ! i. 3 ! - ! `i .'•! _
_ .�-. L1.�C..O QO iiaaa Q.. � 3ra •�:aQ ! i
r a
^r^. :Q QC. Q 3p�.a ^..a.^..a^r.Q^.�} -^...-�,... a^.•Q:Q..�. p..Ca^..Ca `J.^.. -i \
,^."3. ^.. '�p a.Q a v Q p ^.� •�..,'.�.ai.0^'.^r'^•:Q^3 .^..C �;,- 7^� a'�.:.`.Q Q .7 -., i.i'
M T.m. _^ -y-s-i ::i ['- m TCD
.•T. :z :'j! �l .� 1 ..:Z -'! j� \
CD
i
CD
711
..,• - _ _
4.
IL
a l a ♦ ] _
. 1 I i
I w ju
f'
1_ i17
,
7 7 ! _
:1 i;
1
t A.. % 7-
i
zl-
I �
E
y
7 7
7 7 i
f
.. iJ .: J V _ :u
® A f L C L C. C C 5C C.. C L L C_ L
J
I
Z
i 1 I
1 V., 7
i
{
1 i
1
{
1
ti
a.
6 :
L
lu 140
z
€
f.57 en t
F T. - T -- 751 7 .ef
n 7� : ' #
7-
7,
': 0., Cl--m 17 r'G -
s_c C -C C1 T
J J ' ;'i` --# -i -i ia+ -1' -? 7_ �0 -G
v': C C -3 w'G -
ti
_ 000 -000 a=aa cco c o �a i "s J
7 7
-rri r ri _j M. ...y
CD
CD
tJ >� ^a;• -J' ?:i _ 'V r •^:I ��.V ..t r4 �� f\Yt iu J' w .�
71T `v fit,.#at `c:'Q
7_ L. t4,.o J-, .T" .a"
z 'D, z- s i :n
C £ - - -
f
t ri
J
40
_
CP �..jY - Y
W yt y 1
A r j 03 cn J V J D_J y_n J'� 7- V ". v\ v3�::
CD o o - t,2 r�J p V a cn^c Cn.� 2
0o V V co CD CD vi^ V.� ,ivV :" cn V�7 c 'O•v oa
CR oa c c �a Cao oNo coo `_ qui rJ ri b..-. oo _i oa uOJ oa I
I 1
i s
I
Er. J :<: o Lai u .iii i z
'Z 3t S3 7 J
tp
tl
y
i i
o
.tA -i -i o "'., Cr > v "i W
r,; M^:9 ti.�; ,v -i:.: -.i •O -i Baa -i_, ti J -i.J rti^.i
:9 M> ? r
^a�
r _J L '- J W W J ta€Lq -v_ ' i -•i_
W L,4'4 W LA - f-4 ;.S Lr
C3s ji
- - o o a o - o C _
i �; i i a s o c ;o a c o o � -4 � € � 7 ✓ r I
o-3 ,:� �;J '3 'J'J 'J N'� ra1 ?ci ;•_' .,r:'-J r�ry -: �
tn
-r -i1:r,T€ -s - t,-ci�l 7h -n'r 74i 'r'
`C X ;G K`f X `G X 1f XX X ;C X X X X X X X %X '
o aCD 0 €
Q C'a.:.p 't7 r+- V"' _ -i v=•i G_ -0 'I L•3 _^
�^ Z6 En L:{ titj
= 7 7_ tai ,� J V 0-C t G }
.u,^ V' + ^•'J* �.= i j .m^i.-i, W
77 :7n
- c ..: ..�7.�. ti '•: 7_ 9Z` € t
7' _. \7'—! ti / 7 7C^ '� fi Ott.
Si
i
€
_ _ €
�_
N Ln ".`L' .�-� cA L•:s.�= o a Cit�, w',a, J.•„ N
a ca-J;4W ca .. (A(A v^soa W Ly ,. w�C ;o 0o
•+b C`..Cil a c -r.,. V W .-• ;q r' V w 'u is�? '• o o a o o a "4,a v w
oJW -.1 ul -.0 LR _; �C`cD -o -C,a: ac JCO Com•=
y
II O O o i I � Z"
X
E
7ri i
0-0 0 v
1 - 1 I-i
a - - _ - L- ;a
JC.3h J J fJ o V J 1 n3
:a. -i-0 A Y --i
_ �
f-r. LRJJ 'a 9 A -a J _? i -5 ? •D
F I i •I i •i.
_p
1 !
14' �J �J t� T., Y 'J \
D
'
IJ ,vv cli i Z. ._ _ a_ J a_i vvt -
CD
1i
o . .
-
1 ri iZ 7
' W tA Lai rL —t, Y Ly A i J? V: i,C
OD
a tJ `Z _ J _.
zz-
71
O
: 17
1 \
1
�• i
aR M 24 !R to t+i• t 3
t.l w
V_ rJ._.... i =
CC
uc(,.i .9 i' cc _?i Cl _1 C9 `�V IJ M 1,3 CO
C' -
.. tri n. L4 ^`tr v o CO _� A c c - _. c w r-� J!'J V , i
9
.. .,..+. '..+ i ,.-. s y _G {{I
rJ a ;>?
> :-7 ZVI Z., t'
E J :v' _ _{ iaa X 'R
CD
z z
3 7 }
-n n C')M. "3 C-: 71 'U Z7 i7 -p ('}J .'�'O L7 L ('f {'}-C — — i ;a (").
"rG SC G S _' S 3 S G SC T G C
CD
r
tp
ra
mi 71 M 7m 73 7i 71 7-
-_ti t i f # o i ? # i r ! " ;, ? ? o r. Y. o.� '7 >•f1 D
X _ X X X X X XXX:<
tea: G ti C=C G
a 7_ 7.£
C G T -- y S E 7 7 - ! 'S•
V \_ J. -tea +-+ ,^' v 7_ T• — S-r } in
7_ . — - _
N
? Y
a
i
r i t J _nM M' r;, `_ ii=ii kA W al W— v 7
O` 0 -1
CJ co fir. _:s f.:CJa caAV:.n'J Li Vut AJc oo. co cp m Z "r'I
•A o o Lr: Ul. W'J C- as _Cil ao a.A
t A
i o j a _ •-` t o
i
x _ _r. i i, '
_ 7_ 3 -
_ i
7 #
G
Z #
`"9 7
#
c G c c c .e s_c c ' ! m
CD
?a-o-- ca a o o -oaa oao c=
i # !w I#1
rr 'r CA' = _ :,#
t P
_ a .Z>
`
r:i :x ';i 'J•:3 j'_ ri vi w 70 i
j7 To
_V
a o a a S ^a^a a a o a o trl T _
_
X X -X X X X X X >C :t;G X Y ;C X Y X X 1 -q
i 1 # I i 1
a o i
a .... -- - .� _.. a �. O O .y O.... ._ ,_, ... .•., .... �ice' �. � i
r`,St 'v: v V V 7_i�ZZ
!3 Ul
S V .-n st�- v ia. :�i ;�,,. .0 � - i 7_' 7 7_-r 7_ V S• .ia
w ^C% 7, ..r, Sr, : 10 so w Cil
3M £ fa 777 C?
I 7i
z -� -jam - ti -� .n r, ,. Ss ` _ » i
Cu
#
#
Y f
tF� 40
# •r_•
i
V T rJ
CO
T
.A. ., ..+.� oN
ca m "a 1.1 .�•i r., �v v.ti L':w Ll r�0 A`0..+� o o (A`0
i_r,
.OA :....+ a i:OC: <^:�. r `.vcN �.Oor,ioLjoJ:.JC ." oa OD CO oo A i
v r3 `i7 `7 vZ v7 W ♦c? 3 .�; #�3 - .'*7 t i
Ll
7-1
mn 7_ -c! S i 7_ _ _
77
7 >
+ }
i # -T — — iM i — I #T# M
- n O — X a iT^. — X a X O X T♦ `�' X O iZ7 -rt �
w Cl
CD
zz
I>
CD o - "''751
71
f 771 - .� .;. "�' y s+w wwy a+a-+a+r+✓w w tw Ti_y
�...
'J "J r•J 'J �•i�. GS*r'Cri W C�fA;,•, 'u "J'_
r _v J ? ".+ V V V V V ]V Cn
W f,•i o 's# C'1 „c c c o c c c c o o f .J 71
_ c _ c c o .•..o c a c _ c c o _ # �
!#. } 711
rn
L
i ;,d:,3;.# 1# r#<,•! CA •+ .,1 a# �A C4 r#
pl
-t
.Z'
i — \
#
!k
� w t
V # y
W eA M
o CR t� C'1 sa A J rA r' .�... G c.+ ,o•n r o CA
V C^r N^ W AC �,# f- y, a CO O v o,..+ " 'O�r .n 'J ..�o��O^-J o CJ
0 o Cil::} .:�'- o c w w w .0 W :•-i Cf--,a v'.Cq
Jam; oc oo c r oc WC.! aZo _.V M''V A0rJC-.L i
oc ^o CD C;- .i iJ oo vJ UfA 5r'l Aa a`. ^. �' .JA C3 G',wa V. v i
12
lk
a
1.o . 7G
..
:77_
G
im
fp Z
s j M
Tl
�- ?'i �. #
: z
_!7 _f--i-a :� -p :7 -o {�= 2 3'9 C,"�T i7� 0J i .'t r!
G ?GG St_ a 0 SG G :c �G C G G ! m
CD
-i - _y Cr,: _ -: � f,•# --i _ -i _ -{�: _t t:t --{ :V s r^- .-c; -•L
tA
a o 0 0` o oo-oo ao o o r �a000
O - pcz - # 7
a o o a_> .,# .J Z. i
A ?a J
NI
C3 o —
o
?J J rJ
to
i # I i i
7M -r "�= - C L X X C C-r T r, r 7. M T.'r# m m'"T Z
X :C X X :C;,�X X;< X `t j -i
�# #
-i Lr,L' Li .J ... W m M T #
J = 7 ;o M z Z -i'-# 10�: 7_ 7_ .?_ Gi Gni-'";G:
Y 1 Viii O E mss•- ' 3`
JiT T.-r :1 s- .- -- •�z'J'�' 1 M
.. -i-" �• .. 7_ -i -i 7 jz-,_r= CC G.0G i
1
ta
i
# Z r
i \
t
i
f
1
may_ - d -
U. _ # }
J
.� o V V=-�V CT .. p D` ., y. Ln{.i Cn oo .+ .-. nJ .,.1A � AJ p 17- ?#
A --c7 rJ G#W 03 rJ �-A V L-i-� o o o C-- A V o N V- C' .V In r,.:J I
LI V o A 1! = .7 - o I
'a # ,-J =o ~oAw" A'-" .0 "'.,. SCO co o0. A Awa ? E
13
• ! ! ! ! ! ! 1 ♦ • ♦ ♦ ! • 0 k 6 s ;
1
p > i.711
i 7
i p
71
in Ml
i
1 Fri
C?!
CD
�M > >
i 1 1 1 1 i 1 i i i a I t t i i
o a a s c o cc^ c o o c o a^ c c o o — �' ,•_;
i i i I i t s i i i i , .
��"J iil =x ril�J rJ.J r� il ��r .�'J^,,)* \ •-
r o A � \S _ __ �t v V V V' v -',Z vim? . .: \ "Z Z
^ ` '1 _ m...:=r, r -•=' m ".1717 -'E -n r: =z_'!m Y M rn m m _. i .T.:y
Y. X X X X X X X X X Y X X X X r X\:X
i
p
p
rr: '! ;., .� „� m J.� �O<. iy ,,. ..� - G ^J y -J rJ ..a-J wJi'J.s i'J
i J ,,t 'J in .a;n rJ�o^J �`Y ':A OD yr a �J v�:'J ,tet o o 0 7_
CO CO L,. '�r L. .' fs > L� b^J rJ r.)V I'J W r._, ^ W W n.o a ro o.4 pi
V t'il c•- t,1 C-.
1 % • 6 A Q! . `` "k !6 � .t
13
i
J o ,,i V �, '..
NJ
to - O V J
zIm
i' v
R fn
V 'r� V .ti fi .•: E'
fn z
7.1
:3
t
1
j — !
C')- n- s:r n r-; -fi.. n�' {7 i'S_ t7 ":�
�
' I -
_ 7 S C T OT.C S C C .O Z G C C I !Ti
to- � ' -i _ --i --i ,z -4 1 -i J ...; -I -i -ti A .� -i r r i 7_ m .{
u Sal -t _: -i -i _l J -! V 7 :3
7 j
o
• i ! t E i ! � i ! f } t i i � uZ�.
cn
to
tai, `
.>i o o to
. CN'r, ,,j
'"'
a o o c o .1
;< X X �=- XX C X CCCC CCC
i X C C
-
c oCD
' }J. ' 'T �..... .T_j i ri
i s
1
t \
t
t
j
i
V T E'JI
to
'
to 40
10 -0 i•;` V C:J%: .-.ao 0 0 .J --N .n ^ate A to .l to
=A. rJ'J a o 0 0 ,- W A a A o 5 ,;c r, o o
15 -
0 i 0 i t 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0t l
-01
T,
u .J 313
71
4 3 c 73 i
0 �o r.
0-0 E7^o
J T.0 ^ LO T G G SG G
n a oo a is ^•o ^o .,-,•' - -M I#.
1
T S
• a a o=a a o —a o--a a a a s a o a c a a a o o a 7 T—
K K a� :.+ .a K r+K K K `+ K K K K \•. y K K K ; � � y
zr
K K 1 K— O..+ "- �14 Lill
# t t t } # 1 i i i l i # t I e f # i i 7_ 7'••
n, ;f
oaa 0000a ao^_, o 0 o a oa o a a a— - o �r
\ \1\.V\:`.F\\\_•\`�:V\_\\I CA `i ••
i I f i i i # I I ,#. # t %+
M. 4.1M
-"•— `rk7=1 '- -?+ Tri
X XX „XXX Xx X X XX X X C XX i y
�'y .+ia:-� w .a•i•�: L. .?h V::. V\ V ry : '� M -,•i
5 i
i
3 \
i
t
ra a c' a o 'J Ci - V •+ -- ^'” c C '7
-i:U v.'a W :s C" i J A G`�? V�O l `a' - C�`'I J �� Cr •_n A `v, Z m
CC W,aVC" ANrJ.Cri WWC.OA •� r3 -' c co ca Rso ._ c rJ r:i c Wc1 C,;
CK..'J a v Lg-'=3 7 `ril w..1 :A L4 0 ..c .mac W r u
a
a 16 ---
71 n
�{=G
V
7_ �^
r m
71, 77 4C
{
3
#
G - M cn - S = S T G G } to
V ^V C�la �+ ^ v Y;{ _ �` a^. c .. V \i t rw o ti
Ml '`M'J :J -3 A V 0 V' O
J
j i 7'j F V Y Y i' Y-- -`u ^Yµ ,c-•mss \ ••_ ,- V Y - i..--
y _ f x }
.'A=.2 - - iJ _ F..i ;ri.n a#.:. = ? 7b
r
c a_R z W i i _A o _r, �•? i �
tv
:>
-
�� I t # � ! i ± i i 3 i V i # # # ± 'r t i iJ > >•-' :s
'J rJ`J y rJ rJ pa .3. .y :J "J rJ 'J �J' 'a rj
oc cc - c cc^ o 0 o a rr
>
n'V.
M= -^.-i a„#'T -r! - M. ':l 7'!;r - ,moi 7_
GG '�>GXXXY XXXX "XXXX ;<X X X XX X X;`X X i
..D — t •_+
Y.: C-t: ti J J -..'.s ( V J V � 'r G
"i:is G G J:" _ _i t..` _ ^ !.i ;rt
4.
H T 2!'_'i-"S-i •_'1 -.z; Z _ -=> 7 7
'T{_ J'� T� �-i 4 r: I
Ti P'1 T. •n,;i—'rl -.^�. 7 ?
zi
f �
AP
#
' 1
i CJ
1 \
i
1
i
-J W;'J '� jj l7, V v7aA _� "` V is "' L.tYN m (pw ww W'vi ! 7 M
aoV v-.7 CC9Llc r .+rJ0 W .: r.J :� YY CCR. i.9 Y T Cil 01 :^ j. u
.. 31 'v? V 1, CDNACJ.,, Cl ro.07ArJA _ r ACJ Y CJ :ir:J{JCJ
17
L a qL i a l i a a It l C a It l It l
i —_ 7-
4
j Y i
I
y
i
{
i
3> i
v !
J i
'9 rn Cl)
n s
} i M.
z fFs
ticc
7 Z. ?•t
i
z
f
i ¢T7
IM
y
'J
4 \
i
Y
M 1
w _
I
V fJ t z �}
. 1
_3 o r
CA c
18
�i E. S► j. �. L L L L L L L L L L.. L L L L {
tp
> ,
2,
-
ZZ
-`
I !J
an
19
o _
77
77
12
rl
on
CD
cz
71
10
71
-
.. {
1
.. _ _ ..
rJ
-
20
c a a a e a ♦ t r a a a a a a a it
77
.I
7>
G <
i
31
77
? -_
w _ - 10 \
CD t4
- - -
Z 7-
I ._
(
21
( (
M1 6 ` c C C C L c a.- c C c
u v -
- -
7 - -
-C c _ < c
Cl
21
- •- J l n
10
71 7C
-- _
O.
. .r --
ILl
j
la z
Orl
cz
co CD
- _
:
-
-
a
' i •{ i i
_
77
j a
IZ
O
tz
23 _
G 6 C C C C C C L C C L C L c c t C E
t E l l c c c a t— -IL -� -� IL — -qL-- t t t ItIV
I - -
7
f
zzi
: I
i
_ti
7 r 7>
zn
7
i
24
C- t C t
o .o 'o a .,a �, , G t
Z
77 71,
�z z
}
t} _
7-
C)-0 Q- C)- C-; -z- }
. 01.3 o`V o'Ti
MI
<7tif
J n
:1 -^ T Z I sa z
! ! }
71
im
a � n
} N
i
y cl
w fj'? ti C� Co CA*_n +A' .:;. y Cil_„} i :1
*'I Co.; J i J"J
_n .>
w 9 -�J CO c 0 0 0 0.� rJ-1 7- t Z 71
'4 Ln JD oo " o0 00 0o t?Cn Vi 1
_nom '.
25
IL - c
71 f
ci
i
a j -
t
�j
m
J \
r O
q —
_ v�
i i i I tel' ! 1 i
a
oCZ — —o= o o^ sh tri nn.
— — —— ! —
{ {
. .j. J
o
71
- y
:> Z, aN _ _
a — 7 --i ? S
f
TA
b} —
tJ-J
0 000 ..>CAo r+ aid t3! n ••.a .70 =o iJ CO oo
t2-
26
C C C t t C t C C C C L L C C L L L L L L C
- _ ; , _
Orl
' � ' -'� J �: �: _ J J J. .� �e ti Cs-• 'J-� u L'' .'� �J � J ,�,
o a - -
f
cz
70
Ic 71.
a a^ a^
0
o o -
,^.
t
a
e
w 3
µ.., to to Y CO .-_ a `- w C
CD
Cr C4 rJ Lrl Ln o a o 0 0 0 .-,c -J FJ o a oo �J o
27
6i '� `� 1 r/ • i/ N ____.--1I i v 7 ► s_—. s Wit_ y_ l--
_
a:
i
1 7-
i
> —
t
_. }
7
-71
c o
CA
•.,� a _a a { z So
7!1 _ __
T — — —7ri — — — — .. .- ."
X XIX X XX X i ��7<�x X X X^ XX:G i
is !`G ( 3 (
Ji Ja, A A•_ .K.T( V Y i 'moi
mc 7C
771
t4 t4 ri
cq J C4 ,- - I, , - 0
CA Pj
t
7
Gi
bV
:TF
28
4 IL
\ I I �
L7.
n 1;<
Z 79 > = _
71
i.� 77i_ -{
i
< G < < :r s'G C 2 < < 3 G .G m
v_ V V V V V V V V V - ti o ~
7 7
-_o •� c - a
'e; o f *'• ; `i. 'i E i, i _i. --
z
'�
W
71
xi
X7_ 7_' '-s 7 7
zz 71
T Z
<7_ - - - 7-
7m cn
tA
zn
� e
ti v yq
Uf
a . ` c . .
a 'O C3 [J o-7 iJ r J--D c c CO p.CO o ^ iJ!_•.J• to 'si ol.` o c A IZ
u G c A .� V o �J a�J o a o o r�r:: a 0 0 0 0 0 o a - W 'L9 i
J
29 -'
" 7-
7-
7-' z
Z -. 7
711
z.. ^
_ 1 C.3
� 71_ —._.
X X X X X X X X XX x X :t x;C:.x
>L 7 — _ 1
1
W
i.i G.7 A •C> co - iJ -'N}^ �7 N ter, •, ..-'
iJ
_-C9F3 vJ 0 W CI! -
"-=
30
i I �
.;i z t
Ct- C,- C C? 'O C-j.
a o .� n` n V ni. •iv` n C O ^
7 > >_ 21 >h 7 >_ > '_ >_ >
fA J.1 j -.: _ I
OD _ _
74
"•.` -1 J J ..e '" ,1 J J 'J .? J ? mac::�; ,1 .�, — > �,.
w 1-3 77 .; _ _ F
j .�;`c:w .—'i. —' ic.'• :v n; :r€ ;ani _
Iz
CA
a u - _ _
EA-j� M CJ� J.... .p+ rj Ch. W '7 C,
_ p o _ `v T
iJ o c Do 0 00 ^L ,SWC:)
C4 00 DD Op 00 `.] OD '� OO 3
31 -
�
j
J � i
i - X -
a a'
z � x VI -
i f
i
ao r r o c CSM.
o � c ' _o �• -"
_ i I• i ! i ? 3t S
CD
4 CD CD
f_7 71
i ? 1 i 1 i 1 i ? S 3• i 1 ,i ? I ? ? i i -
i
'.N 70- £
v _ i
3 -
{ O
?
rA
1
cR V.co r�o CC C' W 0 .nr.. (_R CA 1- VCo '' o fV .�rJ N r;
..
A� c h w moo •J o W C, .> O•,. o'J`'i a
32 - -
-10
771-4
n.. i
77
Z. 7 ��
..
=> _
it
77
.77
y -
CD Z. M 7 J
-77
7n=1
i C — -�
10
113
7:11 71
i
> > C J :ri ;�r,7 ."moi.• ��� � a _
..a
CO44 44
c_V _ ••+V ,u CO:3 a o C1" -,.• -u v^ o c _.,j o N o a c = ',i _ rw
CA C4 o c .PJ o Cn._.. r q
a
33
- - - - - v - ,
!
7 7- i
a
T
•- T —T �R i_.7_7_7_ 7_7_ f-4 tee: - 7_ ^'70
73
7 _
CA
j
44 14
r> rJ .+ �.. Cq J a3 tl iT!
V W ,� �O �.t y.J C-Y". 'J= V V _ J .�,`
CO .+ ,j V —0 p 4, M PJI CO .'' - CA LAIVit) 0 0 O ^J' O rJ
34
£ �• -
—
7- t 7
> — }
�: ..
1 71
. y � ....-- _ �t _• r u "J
t } t 1 } 1 1
—7
} 1 1 1 1
cz
tn
a
rvi
.- — O
%< :G X%<.. : X;1Y x CCC CCG
Z.
.. -
3._t --f.1
7 c
\
ca
ca
o
J
i
_J_�;il o m.-,s s�'a-.. o o V T.n � �% �+..� 'J •'• ;,.i 7 ''l
O` Ln n� J,.j-.3 Ln'- µJ iJo`• CO iu r r,io v7 ooCJ l "}
i
co
35
I
v s v • v • v • v • • • s • s ♦ ♦ s c a_ i
—T-
1 7-
_ .cs
f
j
i
J
I � ISI
— m
J
i 71
i
f — \ v
f
i
^J
r� 1
36
t L t t ` t t C -
CITY OF ATASCADERO
FINANCE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
JANUARY 1, 1984 TO JANUARY 31, 1984
EXPENSE LISTING
PAYROLL DATED 01/11/84 CHECKS #30340-30443 50, 401. 62
PAYROLL DATED 01/25/84 CHECKS #30445-30530 49,619.98
VOID CK#18382 CK. REG. DATED 01/31/84 (113. 00)
VOID CK#18383 CK. REG. DATED 01/31/84 (3746.84)
VOID CK#18385 CK. REG. DATED 01/31/84 (128 .00)
VOID CK#19107 CK. REG. DATED 01/12/84 (147.23)
VOID CK#19122 CK. REG. DATED 01/12/84 (107.42)
TOTAL $ 95,779.11
37
M ETN37 AGENDA
• DIT # /L
February 6, 1984
To: City Manager
From: City Treasurer and Finance Director
Subject: Corrected pages to both the Treasurer' s Report and
Finance Director ' s Report, for the period of December
1,, 1983 to December 31, 1983.
Attached is a corrected page 2, of the Treasurer 's Report, and
page 3, of the Finance Director' s Report, for the period of December
1, 1983 to December 31, 1983. An invested amount of $50,000.00 was
not included within the Local Agency Investment Fund (L.A.I.F. ) due
to a clerical error. All ledgers and records did reflect the correct
• amount. This error required the correction of both reports.
We request the corrected copies of pages 2 and 3 be placed on the
agenda with a recommendation for adoption. All otherpages of the
December report remain as adopted on January 9, 1984.
Steven M. Rizzuto Ralph H. Dowell, Jr.
Treasurer Finance Director
i
CORRECTED COPY 02/14/84
CITY OF ATASCADERO
TREASURER'S REPORT
DECEMBER 1, 1983 TO DECEMBER 31, -1983
INVESTMENTS
LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND (Corrected Figure) 890,000.00
TIME DEPOSIT, CITICORP SAVINGS T
10.00% INTEREST, MATURES 01/23/84 100,000.00
TIME DEPOSIT, SANTA BARBARA SAVINGS
11.00% INTEREST, MATURES 06/15/83 100,000.00
TOTAL INVESTMENT DEPOSITS 1,090,000`.00
Steven M. R' uto, Treasurer
NOTE: REPORT ADJUSTED BY $50,000.00 'DUE `TO CLERICAL ERROR. ALL
LEDGERS AND RECORDS REFLECTED THE CORRECT AMOUNT.
2
CORRECTED COPY 02/14/84
CITY OF ATASCADERO
FINANCE DIRECTOR' S REPORT
DECEMBER 1, 1983 TO DECEMBER 31, 1983
BALANCE AS OF NOVEMBER 30, 1983 2,467.36
DEPOSITED BY TREASURER, SEE RECEIPTS,
TREASURER'S REPORT, PAGE 1 828 ,207.93
TOTAL 830,675.29
HAND CHECK REGISTER DATED 12/31/83 71, 553.11
CHECK REGISTER DATED 12/13/83 90,460. 67
CHECK REGISTER DATED 12/21/83 312,953. 31
CHECK REGISTER DATED 12/28/83 35,057.62
EXPENSE LISTING 99,836.76
TOTAL 609, 861. 47
BALANCE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1983 220,813.82
PETTY CASH 200.00
TREASURY INVESTMENTS
SEE TREASURER REPORT, PAGE 2 1,090,000.00
TOTAL $1,311,013.82
NOTE: SEE CORRECTED TREASURER'S REPORT OF DECEMBER 1, 1983 TO
DECEMBER 31, 1983. ALL LEDGERS AND RECORDS REFLECT THE CORRECT
AMOUNTS.
I,RALPH H. DOWELL JR. , do hereby certify and declare that
demands enumerated and referred to in the foregoing register
are accurate and just claims against the City and that there
are funds available for payment thereof in the City Treasury.
Dated: January 3, 1984
L-��
Ralph H. Dowell, Jr.
Finance Director
M ray Warden
ty M nager 3
ME'E+;N,3 AG NDA
*ATv o?-i ':l ITEM #
M E M O R A N D U M
•
TO: CITY MANAGER February 7, 1984
FROM: PLANNINGDIRECTOR
SUBJECT: LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 2-83
LOCATION: 9185 Santa Lucia and 6055 Flores (Ptn. Lots 14 and
53, Block 15)
APPLICANT: J.C. and Esther Viera, William McNamara, D.J. Jeffres,
Fred Foss (Greathouse)
REQUEST: Adjustment of property lines to remedy the encroachment
of an existing swimming pool onto an adjacent lot.
On February 6, 1984, the Planning Commission reviewed, the subject
matter on its Consent Calendar approving the lot line adjustment
subject to Conditions 1-5 as set forth in the attached Staff
Report.
There was no discussion.
•
LAWRENCE STEVENS MCJRy L WARDEN
Planning Director City Manager
Ps
CITY OF ATASCADERO
xsisAll ® is s� •
„ Planning Department February 6, 1984
STAFF REPORT
SUBJECT: LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 2-83
LOCATION: 9185 Santa Lucia and 6055 Flores (Ptn. Lots 14 and 53,
Block 15)
APPLICANT: J.C. and Esther Viera, William McNamara, D.J. Jeffres,
Fred Foss (Greathouse)
REQUEST: Adjustment of property lines to remdy the encroachment of
an existing swimming pool onto an adjacent lot,
BACKGROUND
1. Existing Zoning: RS'
2. General Plan: Suburban Single Family Residential •
3. Environmental Determination: The Planning Director has determined
the application to be 'a Class 5 (a) Categorical Exemption according
to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Acta
4. Site Conditions: The sites are located on somewhat hilly terrain.
Access to 6055 Flores Road is via an easement across the street
frontage portion of Lot 53. The pool is located above; this house
on a terrached portion of the lot. The other lot abuts this prop-
erty to the northwest beyond the pool with frontage on Santa Lu-
cia. The surrounding area is generally fully developed with
single family residences`.
5. Project Description: By error , ; a swimming pool was constructed on
a portion of Lot 53 by a previous owner of Lot 14. The owner of
that portion of Lot 53 has agreed to sell the property containing
the pool to the current owner of Lot 14. This requires the lot
line adjustment. The addition of the .058 acre triangle will make
these two parcels a little more equal in size. Both lots are much
smaller than the current minimum lot _size for this zone (2 1/2
acres)
Lot Line Adjustment 2=83 (Viera, et al)
SUBDIVISION REVIEW BOARD
On January 5, 1984, the Subdivision Review Board met to discuss this
matter with the Vieras (Lot 14) ; Fred Foss, their representative; and
James Greathouse, their engineer. Members of the Board in attendance
were: Fred Buss, Associate Planner; Patsy West, Senior Engineering
Technician; and Jim Wentzel, Planning Commissioner. Comments dis-
cussed related to the distance between the pool and the new property
line; the relationship of the slope to the pool; and some minor com-
ments regarding easements shown on the map.
FINDINGS
1. The application as submitted has been determined to be Categori-
cally Exempt from the requirements of C.E.Q.A.
2. The application as submitted conforms with applicable subdivision
regulations.
RECOMMENDATION
Based upon the above findings, the Planning Department recommends ap-
proval of Lot Line Adjustment 2-83 subject to the following conditions
• 1. The lot line adjustment as generally shown on the map attachment
provided subject to the modifications required herein shall be
submitted in Final Map format to be approved by the Planning De-
partment prior to recordation by the County Recorder ' s Office.
2. The new proposed lot line shall be no closer than eight (8) feet
to the outer wall of the pool and shall be indicated as such on
the Final Map.
3. The location of all easements of record and improvements relating
to the two subject parcels shall be delineated on the Final Map.
4. The proposed adjusted lot lines shall be surveyed and monuments
set at the new property corners prior to recordation of the Final
Map. Certificate shall be made on the Final Map that the monu-
ments have been set and that the survey will be able to be
traced.
5. Approval of this Lot Line Adjustment shall expire two years from
the date of final approval unless a time extension has been
granted pursuant to a written request prior to the expiration
date.
2
0 0
Lot Line Adjustment 2-83 (Viera, et al)
ACTION
The Planning Commission should, by motion, direct Staff as deemed
appropriate.
REPORT PREPARED BY: �-�--4.�
FRED BUSS
Associate Planner
REPORT APPROVED BY: laww'e A4,ew
LAWRENCE STEVENS
Planning Director
ps
3 ISI
�o�4
� 'h w
V
S175
J 51z
5'190
y .aeo6 14 b Sx
� 7 �. v is
13 4
J sit
10lb
f2 1917py
"
9
{1,0y �a M1ntiS tis�0 'Y20
'R y
Al�yy� ���q Sy9y�,155yo � p, 0 zi to 4eo 3 ems!
=j yg5 / yob ` 30 ..Sby5,Z9 290 huh �°?' LJFY tsa90 �' 3hys-C •!. `
5 ��o
AG S,fo ` ti 3
� 5910 59q5
5v :'
txy9
S
o 4,
t4 ss '�y0
t } _ vo5i 3f n32 3
s •t °' •
to
5905 0� f�'A o T°• e S A t N N
15m
i 4
o p 1! yr.
8S y5o e
S eQ
31 31 c yid 13` -s 813ts� T ►z tr �0
so '10 *
66, ,v+A yvZti se Oc
�3 . 1078 T
t � f. 10 b
J nay t3 y yyl
A03 9 e3 az _ ° i y-
s s
S p0 aIYSt y�i5 sa e a se
14 S
.� g .. �2 �i�e $ r�ab a 66 V�o° 4ss� soy 43 3r 3e
ei `}r
� S �h-A0,
oo �` se a s se
•. O Mpg l `2{j \ ,t b iP 4->� y u C 3
15 ,
• _ ,b3 s�� D �, o
to 5y�4 ;�' yogii _ 6A
�p y �13oo �O401} �^ts' g2 o t44 Hyl
A2
.P9290
„took Id` /'�'r►3u° e s" s
- � 1, ,tea m
�,c y
� so(d'"' ` ��%'A �►a �3. � 'fny..` A-py� _ ; - ca-
_ p SLS_' Y..-'a• ��gp- (0"i Z 1/1 t �t 1 V
�� ell-
to
o i s 0,Mery 6
. i s
t''fo ADO .• s3 pp�C A FAKyi
-r- (�1� ttSTJ71EJt/T� �h a �N � ?
`1' `900 b9. `.� r,s �� A�\
�f09m�ERA j Fe 3 s
Fos s�<'/2 RT/ Cct s E�
P & AIL � L Z
`� a 6Citi �adO 5 f 1 z X598
x �I:d 5. 7vi �UCfA /¢U oU�91✓ �qo�, �� - �$ (1yi0 a�tQS Cos 2,Sa
60 5Y ,P�wo
.s
ws`L o7s/4+53 ,
CITY OF ATASCADERO 20 }
Planning Department1979
m.�it0 X141+ '}.f. Y J -V pGO�ililAr!'. -
`r`
W
4 W qw•Z ❑ .s. 6 F > .. q O
O' .�.
O a ¢ q z U
h tL � W q ❑ W l�- a ,.-..� W � U .a W 4
C F V N C Z c C O
C 3
z W
O 2 W
.0.1 O 0 O O
F \V\1 (
s
o o o
W F W O ¢ p Z F j O U
O O �tt4v"
Z 1 G F W F 9 4 9 b N u 0.2
W F O 6 G 6 6 S
W
. Y ¢ to ~\
ed 14,
' v]ems�• V
2 O W m —�Fris
'p ?mcOv¢ hp�
` 11l < ONo Q�'e N
�a
x.ry .bz{i2y,y
5 v a
EF fn
s.6 ti
h�� / � \o o tiv y!A'Sg06W
14
X22°
a \ V � n
z
W� p1C�
it N N 4
yob
- NN -05 Cl 41 n' VZ. O
e
a- \
Q
,eOAD N
MEET1 AGDA
•
DATE - / -IV "NITEM _
M E M O R A N D U M :
•
TO: CITY MANAGER February 7, 1984
FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 17-83
LOCATION: Laurel Road (Ptn. Lot 3, Block 41)
APPLICANT: I.D.M. Enterprises (Twin Cities Engineering)
REQUEST: To allow division of 72.7 acres into four parcels
with three of 7 acres and one of 51.7 acres.
On January 16, 1984 and February 6, 1984, the Planning Commis-
sion conducted a public hearing on the subject matter unanimously
authorizing a Conditional Negative Declaration and approving the
parcel map subject to Conditions 1-12 as set forth in the at-
tached Staff Report dated January 16, 1984 with revision of
Condition #8 as outlined in the attached February 6, 1984
memorandum.
The Commission discuss the following matters related to this
request:
- access and type of road improvements
- additional land divisions in the area
John Kennaly and Allen Campbell, applicant' s engineers, appeared
at the meetings and initially expressed concern regarding Condi-
tion #8 (access improvements) . On February 6, Mr. Campbell
indicated that there were no problems with the Staff recommendation.
No one else appeared on the matter.
LAWRENCE STEVENS KURAAYWARDEN
Planning Director Ci y Ma ger
Ps
•
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION February 6, 1984
FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 17-83
LOCATION: Laurel Road (Ptn. Lot 3, Block 41)
APPLICANT: I.D.M. Enterprises (Twin Cities Engineering)
REQUEST: To allow division of approximately 72.7 acres into four
parcels of which three contain approximately seven acres
each and one containing 51.7 acres.
PAST ACTION
-On January 16, 1984 , the Planning . Commissioncontinued the public
hearing on this matter to enable Staff and the applicant to confer on
Condition No. 8 concerning road improvements. •
ANALYSIS
Staff met with the applicant and his engineer and explained the reason
for the condition. Discussion also centered around the level of im-
provement of the road. It was agreed upon by Staff and the applicant
that a paved driveway with an approximate width of 18 feet terminating
at Parcel D would satisfy the current development need in this area.
The _width and level of improvement would be equivalent to the portion
of Laurel Road that currently terminates at the northern tips (en-
trance) to this parcel.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that Tentative Parcel 'Map 17-83 be approved sub7ect
to the Findings and conditions of the January 16, 1984 Staff Report
except `that Condition #8 be revised as follows:
#8. A paved private driveway with a width of 18 feet shall be con-
structed along the access easement from the terminus of the paved
portion of Laurel Road to the frontage of Parcel D prior to re-
cordation of the Final Map.
• 1 . •
Re: Tentative Parcel Map 17-83 (IDM Enterprises)
ACTION
The Planning Commission should, by motion, direct Staff as deemed
appropriate.
/Cw�
LAWRENCE STEVENS
Planning Director
Ps
2
C 0 .n, CITY OF ATASCADERO
1913 C " G, 1a7a
Planning Department January 16, 1984
STAFF REPORT
SUBJECT: _TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 17-83
LOCATION: Laurel Road (Ptn. Lot 3, Block 41)
APPLICANT: I.D.M. Enterprises (Twin Cities Engineering)
REQUEST: To allow division of approximately 72.7 acres into four
parcels of which three contain approximately 7 acres each
and one containing 51. 7 acres.
BACKGROUND
1. Existing Zoning: RS (Residential Suburban)
2. General Plan: Suburban Single Family Residential
3. Environmental Determination: An Initial Study Environmental De-
scription form has been completed. The Planning Director has pre-
pared a Draft Conditional Negative Declaration indicating the pro-
ject will not have a significant adverse effect upon the environ-
ment if certain mitigation measures are incorporated into the
project.
4. Site Conditions: This is a natural watershed with slopes running
20 to 90%. Average slope is approximately 46%. Natural vegeta-
tion covers the entire site and is composed of oaks, scrub oaks,
shrubbery and wild grasses. The site is accessed via a dirt road
which is the terminus of Laurel Road (past Cenegal Road) .
5. Project Description: The applicant requests permission to divide
72.7 acres of land into four parcels. Three of the parcels would
contain approximately 7 acres each and the fourth would contain
51.7 acres. Access is only possible via a driveway from the ter-
minus of Laurel Road south of its intersection with Cenegal Road.
The three 7 acre parcels are located at the bottom of the water-
shed closest to the intersection of Laurel and Cenegal Roads.
These extend from the existing dirt driveway up the hillside to
the east. The larger 51 acre parcel is located at the box end of
the watershed and extends up the hillsides to the east, south and
west.
6. Determination of Minimum Lot Size: Review of the five generalized
performance criteria (Section 9-3.144) for this specific parcel
establishes a minimum lot size as follows:
Tentative Parcel Ma �-83 I .D.M. Enterprises)
P ( P )
Lot Size Factor
Average slope (46%) 2.25
Distance from center (14 - 16,000) .50
Access (improved, 15% slope) .40
Septic suitability (severe) 1. 50
General neighborhood character (5. 08 acres) 1.02 -
Required minimum lot size: 5. 67 acres
The lots proposed exceed the minimum required lot size.
7. Subdivision Review Board: On December 1, 1983, the Subdivision
Review Board met with a representative of I .D.M. Enterprises, and
Linda Roach, the applicant' s engineer, to review the project.
Members of the Board in attendance were: Larry McPherson, Public
Works Director; and Fred Buss, Associate Planner . Discussion in-
volved improving the driveway to all-weather standards, upgrading
the existing wharfhead hydrant at the edge of the project on
Laurel Road, and the problems involved with additional divisions
of the 51 acre parcel.
ANALYSIS
Staff has reviewed the project area and notes there are building sites
available on each proposed parcel. Staff also notes that this is a
watershed basin area with a number of seasonal streams. Septic sys-
tems will require careful placement. Another concern regards the fact
that this is a heavily forested area with a potential for great fire
hazard in the summertime. At the same time, grading and vegetation
removal should be kept to a minimum in order to reduce winter water
erosion.
FINDINGS
1. The creation of four lots with a minimum lot size of 5.67 acres on
this parcel conforms to all applicable zoning and subdivision reg-
ulations and is consistent with the General Plan.
2. The creation of four lots in conformance with the recommended con-
ditions of approval will not have a significant adverse effect
upon the environment, and preparation of an Environmental Impact
Report is not necessary.
2
Tentative Parcel MA7-83 (I .D.M. Enterprises)
RECOMMENDATION
Based upon the above Findings, the Planning Department recommends: is
A) Issuance of a Conditional Negative Declaration as follows:
1. Adequate provision shall be made for drainage and erosion
control and protection in conjunction with site development.
2. Adequate provision shall be made in the design of private
sewage disposal systems to minimize effects on natural water
courses.
3. Grading and tree removal shall be minimized during all phases
of site development.
4. Adequate provisions shall be made for reduction of fire
hazards; and,
B) Approval of Tentative Parcel Map 17-83 subject to the following
conditions:
1. Private 'sewage disposal systems will be an acceptable method
of sewage disposal if reports and designs are acceptable.
All tests, reports and designs shall conform to methods and
guidelines prescribed in applicable City ordinances. The
following Note shall appear on the Final Map:
"Appropriate soils reports including a percolation test, a
test to determine the presence of ground water , and a log of
a soil boring to a minimum depth of ten (10) feet shall be
submitted to the Planning Department prior to issuance of a
building permit. Where soils reports indicate that conven-
tional soil absorption systems are not acceptable, City ap-
proval of plans for an alternative private sewage disposal
system, designed by a Registered Civil Engineer , shall be
required. Depending upon the system, more restrictive re-
quirements may be imposed. Sewage disposal systems shall be
designed and located to minimize deleterious effects on nat-
ural' watercourses.
2. Water shall be obtained from the Atascadero Mutual Water Com-
pany and water lines shall exist at the frontage of each par-
cel or its public utility easement prior to recordation of
the Final Map.
3. All existing and proposed utility easements, pipelines and
other easements are to be shown on the Final Map. If there
are building or other restrictions related to the easements,
they shall be noted on the Final Map.
4. Grading that would be disruptive to the natural topography
shall be minimized. Removal of existing, mature trees shall
also be minimized.
3
P Map*'-
83 Parcel Map 83 (I.D.M. Enterprises)
5. During construction and thereafter, a firebreak shall be
maintained and be made by clearing away for a distance of 30
feet on each side or to the property line, whichever is
nearer , all flammable vegetation or other combustible growth,
excluding single species of trees, ornamental shrubbery, or
other plants used as ground cover , provided that they do not
form a means of rapidly transmitting fire from the native
growth to any building or structure. A Note to this effect
shall be placed on the Final Map.
6. Drainage and erosion control plans, prepared by a Registered
Civil Engineer , shall be submitted for review and approval by
the Planning Department prior to issuance of building permits
in conjunction with installation of driveways, access ease-
ments or structures. This shall appear as a Note on the
Final Map.
7. Plan and profile drawings of proposed individual driveways
and driveway easements shall be submitted for approval by the
Planning and Public Works Departments in order to determine
average grade and appropriate improvement requirements. This
shall appear as a Note on the Final Map.
8. Laurel Road shall be improved to private road standards (20
feet wide, 3 feet graded shoulders on each side) from the in-
tersection of Cenegal Road to its terminus at the frontage of
proposed Parcel D prior to recordation of the Final Map.
9. All drainage swales shall be indicated on the Final Map and a
Note shall appear on the Final Map which states:
"Any modification of the ground during site development with-
in 50 feet of any drainage swale shall be subject to approval
by the Planning and Public Works Departments.
10 . All conditions herein specified shall be complied with prior
to filing of the Final Map.
11. A Final Map drawn in substantial conformance with the ap-
proved tentative map and in compliance with all conditions
set forth herein shall be submitted for review and approval
in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City Lot
Division Ordinance prior to recordation.
a. Monuments shall be set at all new property corners cre-
ated and a Registered Civil Engineer or licensed land
surveyor shall submit a letter certifying that the mon-
uments have been set prior to recordation of the Final
Map.
b. A recently updated preliminary title report shall be
submitted for review in conjunction with the processing
of the Final Map.
12. Approval of this Tentative Parcel Map shall expire two years
4
Tentative Parcel Ma*7-83 (I.D.M. Enter rises � ,
P )
from the date of final approval unless an extension of time
is granted pursuant to a written request prior to the expira-
tion date.
ACTION
The Planning Commission should, by motion, direct Staffas deemed
appropriate.
REPORT PREPARED BY-
FRED
Y•FRED BUSS
Associate Planner
REPORT APPROVED BY: A".",
LAWRENCE STEVENS
Planning Director
Ps
r
5
RJ 40
��s
19 19
�9 p,�
2f1 Oy
41 IZA tov
/04/5
/ov/e JJ
19
• '
3 ED
'?yu /O!'35 17
/o
. J /o4s G3 /°435 34
S 14,
�ENe tRL 7
I��AD s'cco /`os 5 l4 16 ows
ISA 35
c Ii
. � Fp� i - i d '� / - - 6 •• IOY'1'� V r Bs gry7 i
/0705
/093$ '0758
o so
_
�x
say 1 '
ev-
iAf p X j f i T
93w
;7.�„L �'� t'� ' �� �- i .4-� A /°905 •i � /
(�6f1{�)
a n °
ADE�,O
/0,100
tment
14-N ! r
r '_ r 78 '" ti MoKRO ROAD -
"',2
u -
m' lyl0o
i32oo IlAOD
1 �
y2;2:
+ y.
ZE
\ p I
v m
i
{
j
�71 +
MSETMC- - AGrNDA _
LV aim#
M E M O R A N D U M
• February 7, 1984
TO: CITY MANAGER
FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 19-83
LOCATION: 8600 San Marcos Road (Ptn. Lot 1, Block 15)
APPLICANT: A.I. Jones (Hilliard Surveys)
REQUEST: To divide 3.11 acres into two parcels of 1.61 and 1.5
acres.
On February 6, 1984 the Planning Commission conducted'a public
hearing on the subject matter unanimously authorizing a Condi-
tional Negative Declaration and approving the land division sub-
ject to Conditions 1-8 as set forth in the attached Staff Report.
The Commission discussed the matter only briefly
• Grigger Jones, applicant' s representative, appeared and indicated
concurrence with the Staff recommendation:
No one else appeared on the matter.
LAWRENCE STEVEN5 MU RAY WARDEN
Planning Director City Ma ager
•
i
FR(: F FriT1' t
CITY OF ATASCADERO
Wtl.[tl
1979 i
Planning Department February 6, 1984
/ STAFF REPORT
SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 19-83
LOCATION: 8600 San Marcos Road (Ptn. ' Lot '1, Block 15)
APPLICANT: A.I. Jones (Hilliard Surveys)
REQUEST: To divide 3. 11 acres into 2 parcels of 1.61 and 1.5 acres
each.
BACKGROUND
1. Existing Zoning: RSF-Z
2. General Plan Low Density Single Family Residential
3. Environmental Determination: An Initial Study, Environmental
Description formhas been completed by the applicant. The Plan-
ning Director has prepared a draft Conditional Negative Declara-
tion`- indicating the project will not have a significant adverse
effect upon the environment if certain mitigation measures are •
incorporated into the project.
4. Site Conditions: The parcel is one of two lots previously created
by Parcel Map AT 830422:1. ` The parcel encompasses most of a large
hill. Average slope is approximately 11%. Vegetation consists
mainly of natural grasses and three white oak trees of significant
size. A power line with its 40 foot wide easement runs adjacent
to and inside the easterly property line.
5. Project Description: The applicant requests permission to divide
3.11 acres of hand into two parcels of 1.61' and :1. 50 acres each
(gross) .
6. Determination of Minimum Lot Size: Review of the five generalized
performance criteria (Section 9-3.144) for this specific parcel
establishes a minimum lot size as follows:
Lot Size Factor
Average slope (11%) . 30
Distance from center (4,000-6,,000) .10
Access (City-accepted) .15
Septic suitability (severe) .70
General neighborhood character ( . 62 acres) .12
Total lot size factor : 1.37 acres
Tentative Parcel Mape-83 (Jones)
The absolute minimum lot size is 1.5 acres. Since the lot size
factor falls below the required minimum, the minimum lot size is
1.5 acres. The lot sizes proposed meet this minimum requirement
for gross acreage.
7. Subdivision Review Board: On Thursday, January 5, 1984, the Sub-
division Review Board met with the applicant' s representative,
Robert Jones, to review the project. Members of the Board in
attendance were: Jim Wentzel, Planning Commissioner; Patsy West,
Senior Engineering Technician; and Fred Buss, Associate Planner.
Discussion revolved around the previous parcel map approval and
the fact that most improvement requirements were accomplished with
that map.
ANALYSIS
These two proposed parcels each have adequate building and leach field
sites. The existing oak trees are situated near property lines and
should not cause problems for construction of single family homes.
The 40 foot easement for Pacific Gas and Electric along the westerly
"Y" restricts construction within its bounds.
FINDINGS
1. The creation of two lots with a minimum lot size of 1. 5 acres
(gross) on this parcel conforms to all applicable zoning and sub-
division regulations and is consistent with the General Plan.
2. The creation of two lots in conformance with the recommended con-
ditions of approval will not have a significant adverse effect
upon the environment and the preparation of an Environmental Im-
pact Report is not necessary.
RECOMMENDATION
Based upon the above Findings, the Planning Department recommends:
A) Issuance of a Conditional Negative Declaration as follows:
1. Adequate provision shall be made for drainage and erosion
control and protection in conjunction with site development.
2. Grading and tree removal shall be minimized during all phases
of site development; and,
B) Approval of Tentative Parcel Map 19-83 subject to the following
conditions:
2
Tentative Parcel Ma*9-83 (Jones) 0
1. Private sewage disposal systems will be an acceptable method
of sewage disposal if reports and designs are acceptable.
All tests, reports, and designs shall conform to methods and
guidelines prescribed by the Manual of Septic Tank Practice
and other applicable City ordinances. The following Note
shall appear on the Final Map:
"Appropriate soils reports including a percolation test, a
test to determine the presence of ground water , and a log of
a soil boring to a minimum depth of ten (10) feet shall be
submitted to the Planning Department prior to the issuance of
a building permit. Where soils reports indicate that conven-
tional soil absorption systems are not acceptable, City ap-
proval of plans for an alternative private sewage disposal
system, designed by a Registered Civil Engineer, shall be
required. Depending upon the system, more restrictive re-
quirements may be imposed."
2. Water shall be obtained from the Atascadero Mutual Water Com-
pany and water lines shall exist at the frontage of all par-
cels prior to filing of the Final Map.
3. All existing and proposed utility easements, pipelines, and
other easements are to be shown on the Final Map. If there
are building restrictions or other restrictions related to
the easement, they shall be noted on the Final Map.
4. Efforts shall be made to minimize grading that would be dis-
ruptive to the natural topography and removal of existing,
mature trees. The following shall appear as a Note on the
Final Map:
"No trees shall be removed without compliance with applicable
City ordinances. No grading shall commence without an appro-
priate permit and compliance with applicable City ordinances.
5. Drainage and erosion control plans, prepared by a Registered
Civil Engineer, shall be submitted for review and approval by
the Planning Department prior to issuance of building permits
in conjunction with installation of driveways or structures.
This shall appear as a Note on the Final Map.
6. Plan and profile drawings of proposed individual driveways
and driveway easements shall be submitted for approval by the
Planning Department in order to determine average grade and
appropriate improvement requirements prior to 'issuance of
building permits. This shall appear as a Note on the Final
Map.
7. All conditions herein specified shall be complied with prior
to filing of the Final Map.
8. A Final Map in substantial conformance with the approved ten-
tative map and in compliance with all conditions set forth
herein shall be submitted for review and approval in accor
3
Tentative Parcel Map*-83 (Jones)
dance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City Lot Division
Ordinance prior to recordation.
a. Monuments shall be set at all new property corners cre-
ated and a Registered Civil Engineer or licensed land
surveyor shall indicate by Certificate on the Final Map
that corners have been set or will besetby a date
specific and that they will be sufficient to enable the
survey to be retraced.
b. A recently updated preliminary title report shall be
submitted for review in conjunction with the processing
of the Final Map.
9. Approval of this Tentative Parcel Map shall expire two years
from the date of final approval unless an extension of time
is granted pursuant to a written request prior to the expira-
tion date.
ACTION
The Planning Commission should, by motion, direct Staff as deemed
appropriate.
REPORT PREPARED BY: --�--�`
FRED BUSS
Associate Planner
REPORT APPROVED BY:
LAWRENCE STEVENS
Planning Director
Ps
4
LLLL � -
ow Ob
o n v s► s4 =
n
y
u 15 �J�/� ° 'o _♦ Yp a° nVI
N- SOS RFs'
I ^ w � a w 0 ��+ �:•
O +.+a
"�, f r
e-v�0 b9'S v 0
D -
J'
I,� ^0 psy ro r.�r 5 � ` � � p •�'� Q �
1226
v --Q
�� pFI /,
s o
.r msc r
AL
p A{cfCD
�f pry�+( ®� cvis-,k . ' 1 A - *-4'
1650 Q 1 .,�y0 ♦ '
8"40 N
ooLL
b
a �m��6r Y 5 P • "� _ o j i
S O
> OD
cd
t�7N0 0� of °.t� FCS If •? 9 �0 3+ O
00)
.� r�, •''r �4 �y 8605 t--Oma! „/�l�r\�"' .�� o ''03 `P� \\ � 8th
Al_
tn
•jam �� / w ��o° `r ,1�= 3'' P9 \ d / -9 O
\ o 'Nj
to
Pn
` 6
Lr)
^ 0 S 1
"pr e p
� �caiaaai'• . _
o
N N
N
"ov►� a o«�y� � �. h" � -► / _�
Y°°b r• A2Z°OA 1' �, _f.�'Y• 7o` �s "�• m' 7M -
a�r2 4 aa�ya7 • Q/ ��i �
IL
lz
.01
N� • Qj P
A \
M" �•\ m M 7M
M
C. y �y pd
f_� { ,'
1 •
n
-UV CLEMENT '?040
1,4
^aaA �€
O �(' ( " A ?n tiA
\V Vl
MEI T '37 AG7NDA
7EP-- i4 ITEM# ._.
NOTICE OF CONTRACT FE9 3 U4
NMY/Completion CITY MGR.
Date February 2, 1984
TO: City Manager
FROM: Public Works Department
1. Contract No. Bid No. 83-8 dated August 30,1983
for 1983 Overlay Project'
2. Contractor A.J. Diani Construction Co., Inc.
P.O. Box 636
Santa Maria, CA 93456
3. Work to commence by
Commenced work on November 2, 1983
Contract completed on January 25, 1984 Total days
Contract days
days allowed extensions Total
4. Remarks C,.,4scvj—.
ucr Cava 04
.....Signe
cc: Contractor
Finance
MEETING AGENDA
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Murray
FROM: Larry McPherson
SUBJECT: F.Y. 1983/84 Local Transportation Claim
F.Y. 1983/84 State Transit Claim
DATE: February b, 1984
It is recommended that Council approve by minute order the following
transportation claims:
A - 1983/84 Local Transportation Claim
1 Regional Handicapped
Transportation System $ 15,560
2 Atascadero Dial-A-Ride
Transportation System 176,000
3 - Street Maintenance Proiects 102,105
Total Claim $293,665
B - 1983/84 State Transit Assistance Claim
1 Street Maintenance Projects $ 56,532
$ 56,532
Council action on these claims is required in order to receive the
above transportation funds. The San Luis Obispo County and Cities Area
Planning and Coordinating Council, by previous action, has approved the
claimed amounts.
WRENCE McPHERSON
LM`:vh
-MEETING AG-NDA
D .-/444 ITEM
TO: City Council
FROM: City Manager
SUBJECT: A Resolution of the Mayors of all Cities in San Luis
Obispo County urging the League of California Cities
to Develop and Sponsor a California Constitutional
Initiative Restoring and Guaranteeing LocalControl
of all Final Land Use, Subdivision, and Annexation
Approvals for Privately Owned Property
DATE: February 6 , 1984
M E M 0 R A N D- U- M
This is forwarded for your consideration at the request of the
City of San Luis Obispo. There are several major problems associ-
ated with the implementation of this Resolution, among which are
the issue of the League of California Cities sponsoring an initi-
ative and the mechanics of achieving a constitutional amendment.
However , the fundamental question is whether the City Council
wishes to endorse legislation and/or constitutional amendments .
which will take all annexation considerations out of the hands of
State and place them into the hands of local government.
The issue arose as a direct consequence of a court decision
regarding the so called Ferrini Annexation in San Luis Obispo
in which the Ferrini's were seeking annexation. After having
complied with all statutory requirements, an initiative was
presented to bar the annexation. The courts ruled that such an
initiative was inappropriate in that annexation matters were
fixed by State statutes and not subject to local initiative.
The City of San Luis Obispo now wishes to change that situation
through the process suggested by the attached Resolution. This,
or a similar Resolution, was placed before the Leagues - Annual
Conference but was not adopted by several members in attendance.
There is little doubt that local control has been usurped by
State actions, however, it should be pointed out that the issue
of annexation has a long and tumultuous history in the State with
the consequent gradual removal of local` control over this
process. Resolution of this "home rule" erosion is a procedural
Resolution of Mays
one, as well as a philosophical one, and the Mayor of the City of
San Luis Obispo is seeking the support of the Cities to gain
League of California Cities support for legislative remedies.
Thematteris being prepared for presentation at the Channel
Counties Division Quarterly Meeting in addition to seeking
the support of-our- local cities.
/fUIRY L. WARDEN
City Manager
2
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYORS
OF ALL CITIES IN SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
URGING THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES
TO DEVELOP AND SPONSOR A CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTIONAL INITIATIVE
RESTORING AND GUARANTEEING LOCAL CONTROL
OF ALL FINAL LAND USE, SUBDIVISION, AND ANNEXATION
APPROVALS FOR PRIVATELY OWNED PROPERTY
WHEREAS, a traditional and fundamental "municipal affair" of all
local government is "local control" of all final land use, subdivision,
and annexation approvals for privately owned real property; and
WHEREAS, the California Legislature and state agencies have become
more and more involved in usurping local control of all such matters
including, without limitation:
1. Special state land use bills for developers lobbying at the
state level;
2. Annexation statutes purporting to give final annexation
decisions to officials outside the local agency;
3. The establishment of various housing mandates which (a)
require local agencies to respond to nebulous area-wide
housing needs; and (b) interfere with local governmental
attempts to provide safe, quiet, pleasant, and economically
sound residential areas for its citizens;
4. Requiring multiple-family occupancies in single-family
neighborhoods;
5. Enacting extensive condominium conversion regulations, most of
which are unrelated to any valid state purpose or concern;
6. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) , Local Coastal
Plan (LCP) , and similar state regulations, ad infinitum, which
far exceed any valid state purpose or concern; and
Page 1
WHEREAS, California state courts have long claimed the sole power
to determine those matters which are municipal affairs free from inter-
ference by the state, but said courts have recently tended more and more
to uphold the "preemption" power of the state and its agencies to
interfere with and negate local control of such matters; and
WHEREAS, we believe that the proper role of the state in such
matters is to promulgate uniform statewide procedures and guidelines so
that owners of private property subject' to regulation of local agencies
will be assured of due process and equal treatment, but that the sub-
stantive provisions and the final decisions of approval for all such
matters would be retained exclusively by the local agency in which the
real property will be situated after the final decision; and
WHEREAS, the aforesaid state preemption and interference in such
local matters is destroying the ability of local government to effec-
tively assert local control in responding to the needs and desires of
its citizens for a safe, quiet, attractive, and pleasant community in
which to live and provide for their families, and it is long past time
for local elected officials to stop acquiescing and to boldly reassert
the local agency's role as the first bastion of democracy; and
WHEREAS, the political realities are such that it would obviously
be a further waste of time, money, and resources for local agencies to
seek assistance from the Legislature or the courts to correct this
situation, and the only practical and effective long-term solution is
through a California constitutional amendment which returns the final
approval authority on all land use, subdivision, and annexation matters
to the control of local agencies as a local legislative act and
municipal affair;
Page 2
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayors of all cities in San
Luis Obispo County (Arroyo Grande, Atascadero, Grover City, Morro Bay,
Paso Robles, Pismo Beach, San Luis Obispo) as follows:
1. That the League of California Cities develop and sponsor a
California constitutional initiative restoring and guarantee-
ing the authority for final approval of all land use, subdivi-
sion, and annexation of territory matters for privately owned
real property to the local agency in which the property will
be situated subsequent to such approval as municipal affairs
and local legislative acts; and
2. That the proper function of the state, including state courts
and all state agencies, shall be merely to promulgate uniform
statewide procedures and guidelines for local agencies consi-
dering annexation, land use and subdivision matters; provided
that no such procedure or guideline, nor any other state
action or policy, real or imagined, shall ever be interpreted
or applied either to require local agency approval of any such
matter, or to authorize or permit the state to delegate the
final approval power in such matters.
The foregoing resolution was adopted this c�k day of
1983.
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE CITY OF ATASCADERO
By: /14/ By:1�
B'ANN SMITH, Mayor MA RIE MACKEY, Mayor
CITY OF GROVER CITY CITY OF MORRO BAY
By: / By: Ild-1
J ANITA QUALLS, Mayor E GENE R. SHELTON, Mayor
CITY OF PASO ROBLES CITY OF PISMO BEACH
By: By:
441
G RY E. STEMPER, Mayor BILL RICHARDSON, Mayor
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
By:
�ATT AATTT ! nTT T Tf wA...
MUTING AG SNDA
ATE 14-iN ITEM# Z?-,L
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: CITY MANAGER February 6, 1984
FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENT 2-83
APPLICANT: Initiated by Planning Commission c
REQUEST: To add "Indoor Recreation" to uses allowed within th�v IP
(Industrial Park) and CPK (Commercial Park) Zoning
District '`{-
On January 16, 1984 the Planning Commission conducted a: public hearing;
on the subject matter unanimously authorizing a Negative Declaration
and recommending approval of Text Amendment 2-83 as follows:
- add "Indoor Recreation" as an allowable use in the CPK Zone
(Subsection (dd) of Section 9-3.252)
add "Indoor Recreation" as a conditional use in the IP Zone
(Subsection (r) of Section 9-3.303)
The Staff Report, which recommends adding the use only to the 'CPK
Zone, is attached.
The Commission discussed the following matters related to this
request:
- the potential of adding indoor recreation uses to other commer-
cial zones with the approval of a Conditional Use Permit
- the different scales of operations within this Land Use Descrip-
tion and their differing effect on various uses
- the effect of the proposed change on the availability of indus-
trially zoned property for development
The following personsappeared and commented on the matter :
- Gary Larsen with the Atascadero Chamber of Commerce informed the
Commission that the Chamber ' s Board of Directors has no objec-
tion to the proposed change.
- Bob McGarvey had no problem with the proposal' for a required
Conditional Use Permit.
Ze else alpeared" on_the matter.
LAWRENCE ST VENS MU YWARDEN
Planning Director Cilty M ager
_ CITY OF ATASCADERO
isle Planning Department January lb 1984%
STAFF REPORT
SUBJECT: ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENT 2-83
APPLICANT: Planning Commission
REQUEST: To add "Indoor Recreation" to uses :allowed within the IP
(Industrial Park) and CPK (Commercial Park) Zoning Dis-
trict with the approval of a Conditional Use Permit.
BACKGROUND
1. Prior Actions': On November 21, 1983, the owners of McGarvey'' s Gym
petitioned the Planning Commission to initiate a Zoning Ordinance
Text Amendment to allow for the legalization of McGarvey' s new
site at 5225 Traffic Way within the IP (Industrial Park) Zone.
The Planning Commission directed Staff to initiate a public hear-
ing to consider the 'possible addition of "Indoor Recreation" to
the CPK (Commercial Park) Zone as well as the IP (Industrial Park)
Zone. 4%
2. General Plan Considerations: The existing General Plan contains
several policies and guidelines for development within areas des-
ignated for industrial use. The General Plan notes a need for
clean, light industries to broaden the tax base. The General Plan
sets specific policies for light industrial development for both
the industrial and industrial park areas within the community.
The General Plan makes no listing of uses, proposed for these des-
ignations except for the "Light Industrial. Two policies do ex-
ist and are of some concern to the proposed text change with re-
gards; to uses within the industrial areas (p. )
(P• )
"3. Industrial promotion and development shall include a phased
program geared to keep pace with growth trends in the
community.
4. Nonconforming uses shall be prohibited from establishing
within the industrial areas.
The first policy notes a potential need to review those, provisions
regulating development within the industrial area to keep the City
current to trends. The policy sets no specifics but would note
that both the General Plan and its implementation tool, `the -Zoning
Ordinance, are documents that will',potentially need revisions t
keep current to the economic and business trends as well as the
community' s desires.
Zoning -
Ordinance Tex�mendment 2 83
The second policy is somewhat of a semantics problem in that non-
conforming use is a term used within the zoning ordinance for spe-
cific uses that exist on a site but which no longer comply with
current zoning. The General Plan then would be stating the obvi-
ous in that ordinances would not allow for the establishment of a
use not permitted within the particular zone. If the policy is
viewed in a light of not allowing uses that do not conform to the
idea of an industrial use, the policy becomes clearer .
The Commercial Park General Plan designation is for an area for
large lot commercial uses that would accommodate car sales, agen-
cies, mobilehome sales, shopping centers, department stores and
nurseries. The area is also to provide sites for light manufac-
turing and light industrial uses that would meet performance cri-
teria set by the zoning ordinance. These uses would be clean en-
vironmentally and would be larger intensive activities or would
provide a comprehensive and uniform development approach for
smaller developments.
3. Existing Zoning Regulations: The IP Zoning District text is at-
tached for reference. The stated overall purpose of the IP Zone
is to "provide for the light manufacturing and large, lot service
commercial needs of the residents of the City and surrounding
area. " Existing uses listed as approvable within the IP zone
include: Warehousing; Light Repair Services; Collection Stations;
Auto Repair and Services; Small Scale Manufacturing; and other
uses typical of industrial areas. The listing of uses allowed by
Conditional Use Permit include industrial uses that would have a
greater potential impact on the community and some uses that are
not normally found in industrially zoned areas except as an asso-
ciated use with an existing use.
The CPK Zoning District is attached for reference. The stated
overall purpose of the CPK Zone is "to provide for large lot com-
mercial and light manufacturing uses. " The existing uses listed
as approvable within the CPK Zone include: Apparel and finished
products, auto, mobilehome and vehicle dealers and supplies; auto
repair and services; building materials and hardware; contract
construction services; fuel and ice dealers; laundries and dry
cleaning plants; schools - business and vocational; small scale
manufacturing and several retail commercial operations if estab-
lished in combination with a commercial center containing a major
commercial tenant. The listing uses allowed by Conditional Use
Permit includes heavy commercial and industrial uses; machinery
manufacturing; paving materials; chemical products; plastic and
rubber products; public assembly and entertainment; textile mills;
glass products; and paper products.
The Zoning Ordinance defines "Indoor Recreation" as:
Facilities for various indoor sports and recreation, including:
bowling alleys; ice skating and roller skating; gymnasiums; health
and athletic clubs; tennis, handball, racquet ball and similar in-
door sports; recreation and community centers.
2
Zoning Ordinance Tei Amendment 2-83
Under the present zoning ordinance, Indoor Recreation is allowed
as follows:
CN - Commercial Neighborhood. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Not Allowed
CP - Commercial Professional. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Not Allowed
CR - Commercial Retail. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Conditional Use
CS - Commercial Service. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Conditional Use
CT - Commercial Tourist. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Subordinate Uses
CPK- Commercial Park. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Not Allowed
L - Recreational. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Allowed Use
LS - Special Recreation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Conditional Use
IP - Industrial Park. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Not Allowed
I - Industrial. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Not Allowed
4. Environmental Determination: An Initial Study Environmental De-
scription form has been completed. The Planning Director has
prepared a Draft Negative Declaration indicating that the project
will not have a significant adverse effect upon the environment.
STAFF ANALYSIS
In consideration of adding any use to an existing zoning district,
several fundamental questions need to be examined. Not only should
the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance designations be examined for
potential consistency problems, but the possible effects on other uses
and effects on the use itself should be examined. The need for addiie
tional areas for a particular use also needs to be reviewed.
The existing General Plan Industrial Park designation as previously
noted sets some specific guidelines but makes no listings of uses to
be allowed. The listing is replaced with a title of "Light Indus-
trial" uses. Under the Commercial Park designation some specific uses
are listed but room is left for individual determinations. The order-
ing of land uses into neat, general categories of commercial, indus-
trial and residential is the typical approach used (General Plan land
use designations) . These categories are detailed into specific uses
that are determined to be compatible and similar (zoning districts) ,
usually with a progression from heavier to lighter uses.
As to "Indoor Recreational" uses, strictly looking at the use, it
would undoubtedly be classified in the categories of recreational and
commercial. The standard industrial classification coding of the uses
within this designation would place the uses in these areas and not
within an industrial classification.
The current zoning ordinance text provides direction in that the IP
(Industrial Park) zone is established "to provide for the light manu-
facturing and large lot service commercial needs. . . . . . . In reviewing
the policy statement, it would seem that the uses listed as Indoor
Recreational (bowling alleys, roller or ice skating rinks, gymnasiums,
athletic clubs. . . . . ) would not fit the pattern of being light manufac-
turing turing or service commercial in nature. It should be noted that the. .
typical uses listed as indoor recreation will need larger sites than
3
Zoning Ordinance Tex*mendment 2-83
most uses.
In the CPK Zone the ordinance text provides direction in that the pur-
pose of the district is to provide for large lot commercial and in-
dustrial development. It would seem that the uses listed within the
designation of "Indoor Recreation" could fit into the general CPK
purpose in that most uses listed would require large lots for devel-
opment. The types of uses listed within the CPK Zone seem to be com-
patible with the uses listed within the specific designated uses of
Indoor Recreation.
The existing zoning ordinance provides for indoor recreation uses in
three commercial zones and within the recreation zones. The uses are
specifically limited to the CR and CS zones with the approval of a CUP
and within the CT zone as a subordinate use. The present zoning ordi-
nance appears to be concerned about the potential uses impact on sur-
rounding uses due since a CUP is required. Within the existing CR, CS
and CT Zones along with the two recreational zones, ample land and
sites are available for development for potential indoor recreational
uses.
In the past the Commission has reviewed a similar use in. a zoning text
amendment for Amusement Services (game arcades) and noted a need for
conditionally approving any such project. The uses are somewhate sim-
ilar in providing recreational entertainment.
Within the IP Zone, there are presently included several uses that can
be considered non-industrial in nature including heavy commercial uses
(listed as allowable uses) such as broadcast studios, building mater-
ials, and hardware, fuel and ice sales, furniture and fixtures, auto
repair and services, business support services. In the area of uses
listed as Conditional Uses, several uses are listed that are also not
usually considered as industrial type uses, including caretaker resi-
dences and schools - business and vocational. Overall, the district
seems to be internally consistent with its purpose with the potential
exception of schools - business and vocational. However, in viewing
vocational schools it would seem logical to have welding and heavy
equipment training in an industrial zone, but vocational dance schools
may not be compatible with an industrial zoning designation.
Indoor recreation as defined contains numerous uses ranging from large
scale recreational facilities to potentially small entertainment and
health clubs. It would be difficult to determine an overall impact of
adding one type of use to a zone. An individual evaluation of each
proposal review could minimize the impacts.
FINDINGS
1. Inclusion of "Indoor Recreation" as a use within the IP (Industri-
al Park) zoning district would not conform to the stated purpose
of the Industrial Park zoning district, but would conform to the
stated purpose CPK (Commercial Park) Zone.
4
Zoning Ordinance Teo Amendment 2-83
2. "Indoor Recreation" uses are not consistent with the concept of
typical industrial uses and thus would not conform to the General*
Plan' s policy relating to nonconforming uses within the Light In-
dustrial areas.
3. "Indoor Recreation" type uses are not compatible with allowable
and conditional uses now permitted within the IP (Industrial Park)
zoning district in terms of intensity of use, needs, and other
requirements.
4. "Indoor Recreation" type uses are compatible with allowable uses
now permitted in the CPK (Commercial Park) zoning district in
terms of intensity of use, needs and other requirements.
RECOMMENDATION
Based upon the above Findings, the Planning Department recommends as
follows:
1. Issuance of a Negative Declaration; and,
2. Approval of Text Amendment 2-83 as follows:
a. Add "Indoor Recreation" as an allowable use in the CPK Zone
(Subsection (dd) of Section-9-3.252) .
ACTION
The Planning Commission should, by motion, direct Staff as deemed
appropriate.
REPORT PREPARED BY:
J ELI MOSES
A so Planner
REPORT APPROVED BY:
WRENCE STEVENS
Planning Director
Ps
5
ADOPTED JUNE 27, 1983
CPK (COMMERCIAL PARK) ZONE
9-3. 251. Purpose: This zone is established to provide for large
lot commercial and light manufacturing uses. It is intended tha-t
special attention be given to providing for comprehensive development
plans to achieve appropriate functional relationships between various
uses and to preclude "piecemeal" development of existing larger lots.
9-3. 252. Allowable Uses: The following uses shall be allowed in
the Commercial Park Zone. The establishment of allowable uses shall
be as provided by Section 9-2. 107 (Plot Plans) and Section 9-2.108
(Precise Plans:
(a) Apparel and finished products
(b) Automobile, mobilehome and vehicle dealers and suppliers (See
Section 9-6.163)
(c) Auto repair and services (See Section 9-6.168)
(d) Accessory storage (See Section 9-6.103)
(e) Broadcasting studios
(f) Building materials and hardware (See Section 9-6.165)
(g) Business support services
(h) Collection stations (See Section 9-6.130)
(i} Contract construction services
(j) Electronic and scientific instruments
(k) Farm equipment and supplies
(1) Food and kindred products (See Section 9-6.128)
(m) Fuel and ice dealers (See Section 9-6. 129)
(n) Furniture and fixtures
(o) Horticultural specialties (See Section 9-6 .116)
(p) Laundries and dry cleaning plants
(q) Light repair services
(r) Mail order and vending
(s) Roadside stands (See Section 9-6 . 117)
3-35
ADOPTED JUNE 27 , 1983
• •
( (t) Sales lots (See Section 9-6.139)
`> (u) Schools - business and vocational (See Section 9-6 . 125)
(v) Small scale manufacturing
(w) Stone and cut stone products
(x) Temporary events (See Section 9-6.177)
(y) Temporary or seasonal sales (See Section 9-6. 174)
(z) Utility transmission facilities
(aa) Vehicle and equipment storage (See Section 9-6 . 183)
(bb) Wholesaling and distribution
(cc) The following uses when established in conjunction with a
commercial center containing at least one major commercial
tenant with a minimum of 20 , 000 square feet of floor area:
(1) Eating and drinking places
(2) Financial services
(3) Food and beverage retail sales
(4) Furniture, home furnishings and equipment
(5) General merchandise store
(6) Health care services
(7) Offices
(8) Personal services
9-3. 253 . Conditional Uses: The following uses may be established
in the Commercial Park Zone. The establishment of conditional uses
shall be as provided by Section 9-2. 109 (Conditional Use Permits) :
(a) Caretaker residence (See Section 9-6.104)
(b) Chemical products
(c) Concrete, gypsum and plaster products
(d) Machinery manufacturing
(e) Paving materials
(f) Pipelines
3-36
ADOPTED JUME 27, 1983
. (g) Plastics and Rubber products
(h) Public assembly and entertainment
(i) Recycling and scrap (See Section 9-6. 131)
(j) Textile mills
(k) Transit stations and terminals
(1) Vehicle and freight terminals
(m) Warehousing
(n) Bed and breakfast
(o) Glass products
(p) Lumber and wood products
(q) Paper products
(r) Structural clay pottery products
9-3 . 254 . Lot Size: The minimum lot size in the Commercial Park
Zone shall be two acres. Smaller lot sizes may be allowed for planned
commercial and industrial developments, including condominiums, where `
the Planning Commission determines that such smaller lot sizes will
not be detrimental to the purpose and intent of the Commercial Park
Zone.
3-37
ADOPTED JUTE 27, 1983
IP (Industrial Park) Zone
9-3 . 301. Purpose: This zone is established to provide for the
dight manufacturing and large lot service commercial needs of the
residents of the city and surrounding areas.
9-3 . 302. Allowable Uses: The following uses shall be allowed in
the Industrial Park zone. The establishment of allowable uses shall
be as provided by Section 9-2.107 (Plot Plans) and Section 9-2.108
(Precise Plans) :
(a) Farm equipment and supplies
(b) Laundries and dry cleaning plants
(c) Broadcast studios
(d) Stone and cut stone products
(e) Temporary events (See Section 9-6.177)
(f) Temporary or seasonal sales (See Section 9-6. 174)
(g) Building materials and hardware (See Section 9-6.165)
(h) Utility transmission facilities
(i) Fuel and ice dealers (See Section 9-6 .129)
(j) Warehousing
(k) Wholesaling and distribution
(1) Light repair services
(m) Accessory Storage (See Section 9-6 .103)
(n) Sales lots (See Section 9-6.139)
(o) Storage yards (See Section 9-6 .140)
(p) Apparel and finish products
(q) Collection stations (See Section 9-6 . 130)
(r) Electronic and scientific instruments
(s) Furniture and fixtures
(t) Auto Repair and Services (See Section 9-6 . 163)
(u) Business support services
3-38
ADOPTED JUNE 27, 1983
(v) Vehicle and equipment storage (See Section 9-6 . 183)
(w) Contract construction services
(x) Small scale manufacturing
(y) Food and kindred products (See Section 9-6.128)
9-3. 303. Conditional Uses: The following uses may be allowed in
the Industrial Park Zone. The establishment of conditional uses shall
be as provided by Section 9-2. 109 (Conditional Use Permits) :
(a) Agricultural processing
(b) Chemical products (See Section 9-6 .127)
(c) Concrete, gypsum, and plaster products
(d) Caretaker residence (See Section 9-6 . 104)
(e) Glass products manufacturing
(f) Machinery manufacturing
(g) Lumber and wood products
(h) Paving materials
(i) Pipelines
(j) Plastic and rubber products
(k) Recycling and scrap (See Section 9-6.131)
(1) Schools - business and vocational (See Section 9-6.125)
(m) Textile mills
(n) Transit stations and terminals
(o) Vehicle and freight terminals
(p) Paper products
(q) Structural clay pottery products
9-3 . 304 . Lot Size: There shall be no minimum lot size in the
Industrial Park Zone.
3-39
ATE a?- /,V-X4 ITEM
ORDINANCE NO. 76
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO
AMENDING MAP NO. 22 OF THE OFFICIAL
ZONING MAPS OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO BY
CHANGING CERTAIN PROPERTY ON LAKEVIEW
DRIVE FROM L (RECREATION) TO- RSF-Y' (RES-
IDENTIAL-SINGLE FAMILY)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO ORDAINS as follows:
Section 1. Council Findings.
After conducting a public hearing, the City Council finds and
determines that:
1. The proposed zone change from L (Recreation) to RSF=Y (Res-
idential Single Family), is in conformance with the General
Plan and its policies regarding open space around Atascadero
Lake.
2. Approval of this project is consistent with Section 65854-
65856 of the Government Code and Section 9-1.115 of the Zon-
ing Regulations of the City of Atascadero.
3. The proposed Zone Change to RSF-Y will be more compatible
with existing zoning and uses on surrounding property.
Section 2. Zoning Change.
Map No. 22 of the Official Zoning Maps of the City of Atascadero
on file in the Planning Department is hereby amended to reclassify the
following described property from L (Recreation) : to RSF-Y (Residential
Single Family) :
Lots 43-45 and 36-41 of Block 12 of Atascadero Colony.
Block 12 of Atascadero Colony.
Section 3. Zoning Map.
Map No. 22 of the Official Zoning Maps of the City of Atascadero
on file in the Planning Department is hereby amended as shown on at-
tached Exhibit "A" which is hereby made a part of this ordinance by
reference.
Ordinance No. 76 •
Section 4. Publication.
The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published once
within fifteen (15) days after its passage intheAtascadero News, a
newspaper of general circulation, printed, published, and circulated
in the City in accordance with Section 36933 of the Government Code;
shall certify the adopting and posting of this ordiance and shall
cause this ordinance and this certification together with proof of
posting to be entered into the Book of Ordinances of this City.
Section b. Effective Date.
This ordinance shall go into effect and be in full force and ef-
fect at 12:01 a.m. on the 31st day after its passage.
The foregoing ordinance was introduced on February 14, 1984 and
adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
MARJORIE M. MACKEY, Mayor
ATTEST:
BARBARA NORRIS, City Clerk
APPROVED AS FARM:
ALLEN GRIMES, City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
MURRAY L. WARDEN, City Manager
2
v�
N
°asko ,
F
`r Xv ,
` ° c
•
N W
!p
,
3r_ E
` 3y.yq
.3 V1
� s S
p?
> ! 0±
^� 3
4.
�' wso�oo`E
>s p
O �w 2�5 o
N
(` ZL 6. x G
Ngo
cc,g «, m
r�4/
W � �
2so±
N 46
EXHIBIT A
ORDINANCE # 'p
ZONE CHANGE 2-83
S
L (Recreation) to RSF-Y Jf
Z°�'0 a
N 40 co
W
s
�* r
(8o_1
,Q .001F` 2
01 1 N o
0'
io
W
W �
w �
N
0
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: CITY MANAGER February 6 , 1984
FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGE 2-83
LOCATION: 9115-9185 and 9245-9395 Lake View Drive (Lots 43-45, 36-41
of Block 12)
APPLICANT: Initiated by Planning Commission
REQUEST: To change the L (Recreation) Zoning on nine lots fronting
on Lake View Drive to RSF-Y (Residential Single Family) .
On January 16, 1984 the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing
on the subject matter unanimously (with Commissioner Lilley abstain
ining) authorizing a Negative Declaratrion and approval of Zone Change
2-83 as set forth in the attached Staff Report.
The Commission discussed the following matters related to this request
- the need for the inclusion of the properties not being exchange
in the rezoning
- the ability to develop the properties that do not have sewer
services available
The following persons appeared and commented on the matter :
- Mrs. Biggler, Ardilla Road resident, asked several questions
concerning the procedures for the exchange of the property
- Barny Lampy asked what the City' s intentions for the property at
Santa Rosa and Lake View Drive was and if it was being rezoned
James Dischner, Lake View Drive resident, asked several ques-
tions concerning the disposal of the City-owned property, the
potential development of the property not being exchanged and
the road conditions.
No one else appeared on the matter.
LAWRENCE STEVENS MUR Y L WARDEN
Planning Director City Man ger
�[ ? �" �"�� � CITY OF ATASCADERO
19ls` 1 �r � 79
� d c 19Planning Department January 16, 1984
STAFF REPORT
SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGE 2-83
LOCATION: 9115-9185 and 9245-9395 Lake View Drive (Lots 43-45, 36-41
of Block 12)
APPLICANT: Initiated by Planning Commission
REQUEST: To change the L (Recreation) Zone on nine lots fronting on
Lake View Drive to RSF-Y (Residential Single Family)
BACKGROUND
1. Prior Action: At its December 19, 1983 meeting, the 'Planning Com-
mission initiated the proposed zoning map revision on property
owned by the City. Part of this property has been part of nego-
tiations by the City to acquire property along Morro Road. The
negotiations have been completed and certain properties will be
exchanged. The Lake View property is intended for Single Family
Residential use by the new owner . The present zoning and zoning
regulations would not allow for a single family residence neces-
sitating the proposed zone change.
2. General Plan Consideration: The existing General Plan land use
designation for the site can be either Moderate Density Single
Family or Recreation since the properties are in a transitional
area. A review shows no other policy statements concerning these
properties.
3. Existing Zoning Regulations: The basic differences between the L
and RSF Zones are that the L Zone could allow for commercial dev-
elopment of the sites ( i.e. rural sports and group facilities,
amusement services, general merchandise stores where related to
recreation facilities; and schools (business and vocational) )
while the residential designation will, as usual, be restricted to
residential and residential accessory type uses.
4. Environmental Determination: An Initial Study Environmental De-
scription form has been completed. The Planning Director has pre-
pared a draft Negative Declaration indicating the project will not
have a significant adverse effect upon the environment.
Zone Change 2-83 • •
STAFF COMMENTS AND ANALYSIS
The site' s surrounding buildable lots are all presently zoned RSF-Y,
and most are developed with single family residences. Lots 43-45 are
within the Improvement District with the remaining lots being within
the Sanitation District, but services are not presently available.
The proposed development as single family residences will, undoubted-
ly, be more compatible with the immediate area than the private devel-
opment of recreational uses.
FINDINGS
1. The proposed zone change from L (Recreation) to RSF-Y (Residential
Single Family) is in conformance with the General Plan and its
policies regarding open space around Atascadero Lake.
2. Approval of this project is consistent with Section 65854-65855 of
the Government Code and Section 9-1. 115 of the Zoning Regulations
of the City of Atascadero.
3. The proposed Zone Change to RSF-Y will be more compatible with
existing zoning and uses on surrounding property.
RECOMMENDATION
Based upon the Findings, the Planning Department recommends issuance
of a Negative Declaration and approval of Zone Change 2-83 changing
the zoning from L to RSF-Y for Lots 36-41 and 43-45 of Block 12.
ACTION
The Planning Commission should, by motion, direct Staff as deemed
appropriate.
REPORT PREPARED BY: 4(4
(JOE(JOEIL MOSE
A late Planner
�i61�ILrw �GV"L"
REPORT APPROVED BY:
LAWRENCE STEVENS
Planning Director
Ps
2
JS9r :3 D
�? o
• �i_ 1`j yP 3s ,t�ti �j T � _
on sk,
ra� t1
� 2
QP O \1 O
50
�Qqy �`��j_• B•{tY 7,�Jy� 4} .- 1 Z ,�t77z� \� A 7 J't 'f•n
�Clo20; ,�� g' V30P1 ; fw (jl"tr,. /�, ♦�� c.Z. s.11"-
pT /yy 96,30
{ A�
9 Sty foto t fin. 9ti aA o
NEo12 .
° �.
J6
h
a
.ry�
20
AN
21
leo
15
262
14 a� �\ o� aC' /;_, j1 ado r' 2
2 aT y f
/ h zs;\
RIP 230 �
03
lz
FV
•ii-79.4:$ r � \ �
24 oe/
2 5 ON ' p co
00�N
117
to
z 84
ZO NE L - t33
918S�9Z45-9395—
. ••��r ► - ,rY' ''�.-�.,�„`--..��__ � ,.. � LA+cr=yrc W Aea vc-
TZ s'F-y
�, _ '�i.;J AG'-, IDA
M E M R A N D U M
TO: Murray
FROM: Larry McPherson
SUBJECT: 1984-85 Five Year C.I.P.
DATE: February 6, 1984
Attached is Program C,_a"third version of the 1984-85 Five Year
C.I.P. , showing the effect of creating a $500,000 Building Reserve Fund
in Fiscal Year 1984-85. This arises from the Council actionasking for
$300,000 to be placed in the 1984/85 C.I.P. in addition to the $200,000
taken from the 1983/84 budget. This plan is a modification of Program
B, which had eliminated almost all discretionary capital programs from
the five year program in order to reserve funds for a Police facility.
Program C requires cuts in Salaries and Benefits, Services and •
Supplies, and Miscellaneous Capital (or some other combinations) as shown
on the attached sheets in order to achieve the desired fund balance. It
can be seen that even with the drastic reduction of $259,000 in operating
costs for F.Y. 1984/85, it still takes the full five years to acquire
adequate reserve funds for construction of the Police building.
Further cuts can be maintained into future budget year's operating
funds, however, this does not seem reasonable or even possible in light
of current and projected service demands. For the purpose of this analysis,
the projection of a 5% per year increase for costs of Services and Supplies,
Salaries & Benefits, and Misc. Capital are suspended for F.Y. 1984/85 and
resumed in the following years of this program.
LAWRENCE McPHERSON
LM:vh
CIP 1984-1989 .
F.Y. 1984-85 - PROGRAM C
Revenue
General Revenue Projection $3,707,000
Committed Reserve Fund
Contingency $150 ,000
Building 200,000
Equipment 79,000
$429,000 $429,000
Total Revenue $4 ,136,000
Salaries and Benefits
Projected Cost $2,097,000
Services and Supplies
Projected Cost $1,032,000
Capital Expenditures
Misc. Capital 66,000
1984-85 CIP 341,000
VZU7-1-900 $407 ,000
Reserves
Contingency 100 ,000
Building 500,000
T6 (U-1U00 $600,000
Reserve Balance -0-
Revenues include a projected reserve carryover of $429,000. In order
to arrive at a total Building Reserve Fund balance of $500,000, it is
necessary to make reductions in the following categories as shown:
Fund 1983/84 Amount 1984/85 Amount- Reduction
Salaries & Benefits $2,116,000 $2, 097,000 $ 19,000
Services & Supplies 1,180, 000 1,032,000' 148,000
Misc. Capital 158 ,000 66,000 92,000
Total Reduction: $259, 000
Since the above figures show a reduction from budget year 1983-84 , the
actual decrease in operating funds for F.Y. 1984-85 is more than that
in real dollors with inflation and other cost increases adding another
5% less in operating capability.
i
16
CIP 1984-1989 , . 0
The real effect of these decreases would be as follows:
Salaries and Benefits - Freeze in all pay increases, negotiated
or in-grade, and loss of at least one mid-level employee and;
Services and .Supplies - 12.5% reduction in purchase of supplies
and services by all departments and;
Capital - $92,000 reduction in purchase of expendable capital
items such as: small tools, fire hose, police equipment, etc.
Projects for this year include only lease/purchase payments and
$302,000 for street maintenance using restricted funds. Building Re-
serve Fund carryover is $500, 000 to be used for construction of a
separate police facility.
•
17
CIP 1984-1989 . S
F.Y. 1985-86 PROGRAM C
Revenue
General Revenue Projection $3 ,966,000
Committed Reserve Fund
Contingency 100 ,000
Building 500 ,000
600, 000 600 ,000
$4 ,566 ,000
Salaries and Benefits
Projected Cost $2, 333 ,000
Services and Supplies
Projected Cost $1,192,000
Capital Expenditures
Misc. Capital 78,000
1985-86 CIP 356,000
$434,000 $434 ,000
Reserves
Contingency 100 ,000
Building 507,000
607 ,000 $607,000
Reserve Balance -0-
Revenues include $500,000 projected Building Reserve. There are no
proposed changes in personnel or service levels.
projects for this year include only lease/purchase payments and
$301,000 for street maintenance using restricted funds. Building
Reserve Fund is $507,000 , an incremental increase of .. $7,000 .00 for
the Police Facility. If a greater incremental increase is desired,
then cuts will have to be made in Salaries and Benefits, Services and
Supplies or Capital Expenditures.
I
18
I
CIP 1984-1989 • •
F.Y. 1986-87 PROGRAM C
Revenue
General Revenue Projection $4 ,244,000
Committed Reserve Fund`
Contingency 100 ,000
Building $507, 000
607, 000 $607,000
$4 ,851,000
Salaries and Benefits
Projected Cost $2,450,000
Services and Supplies
Projected Cost $1, 252,000
Capital Expenditures
Misc. Capital 82,000
1986-87 CIP 445,000
$527,000 $527,000
Reserves
Contingency — 100,000
Building 522,000
$622,000 $622,000
Reserve Balance -0-
Revenues include a projected Building Reserve Fund carryover of
$507 ,000. There are no proposed changes in personnel or service levels
for this fiscal year.
Major projects include: (1) Replace Police vehicles - $60 ,000; (2)
Street Maintenance projects - $307,000; (3) Replace Dial-A-Ride Bus
- $32 , 000. Balance of capital funds are for lease/purchase payments.
Projected Building Reserve Fund is $522,000 , an incremental increase
of $15, 000 for the Police Facility. Any greater incremental increase
will require further expenditure cuts.
•
19
CIP 1984-1989 • 0
F.Y. 1987-88 PROGRAM C
Revenue
General Revenue Projection $4 ,541,000
Committed Reserve Fund
Contingency 100 ,000
Building 522, 000
$622,000 $622,000
Total Revenue $5,163,000
Salaries and Benefits
Projected Cost $2,572,000
Services and Supplies
Projected Cost $1,315,000
Capital Expenditures
Misc. Capital 86 ,000
1987-88 CIP 439 ,000
$525,000 $525,000
Reserves
Contingency 100 , 000
Building $651,000
$751,000 $751,000
Reserve Balance -0-
Revenues include a projected Building Reserve Fund carryover of
$522,000 . No change is shown in the service level or personnel this
year.
Major projects for this year include: (1) Replace Police vehicles -
$23, 000; (2) Replace Dial-A-Ride Bus - $35,000; (3) Alvord Field
Renovation - $25 ,000 ; (4) Street Maintenance projects - $310,000.
Balance of capital funds are for lease/purchase payments. Projected
Building Reserve Fund is $651, 000 , an incremental increase of $129,000
for the Police Facility.
I
20
CIP 1984-1989 , S
F.Y. 1988-89 PROGRAM C
Revenue
General Revenue Projection $4 ,859 ,000
Committed Reserve Fund
Contingency 100 , 000
Building 651, 000
651, 000 $651,000
$5 ,510,000
Salaries and Benefits
Projected Cost $2,701,000
Services and Supplies
Projected Cost $1, 381,000
Capital Expenditures
Misc. Capital 90 , 000
1988-89 CIP 1,057,000
$1,147 ,000 $1, 147,000
Reserves
Contingency 100 ,000
Building 181,000
$281, 000 $281,000
Reserve Balance -0-
Revenues include a projected Building Reserve Fund carryover of
$651,000 . No change is shown in the service level or personnel this
year.
Major projects for this year include: (1) Replace Police vehicles -
$62, 000; (2) Police facility construction - $650, 000; (3) Street
Maintenance projects - $310 ,000 . Balance of capital funds are for
lease/purchase payments. This appears to be the first possible year
for construction of the Police facility resulting from the previous
fund building program and assuming that a library or other facility
construction or program funding change have not occurred.
21
c" l
r
TE r,?•/4 -,Fel- ItEM # D—f
M E M O R A N D UM
TO. Murray
FROM: Larry McPherson
SUBJECT: Resolution of Intention - San Fernando Road
DATE: January 12, 1984
Attached is the Resolution of Intention necessary to proceed with the
formation of a-Maintenance Assessment District for San Fernando Road. Council
has previously accepted a petition from property owners in this area to
process the district.
This Resolution establishes a hearing date for protests to be received
and is the second step in the formalization of the district. Once the hearing
date is set, property owners have the opportunity to file written protests
with the Council.
If more than 50% of thero ert owners protest this district, then the
P P y
proceedings may be dropped, or Council could override the protests by a 4/5ths
vote. Should less than 50% of the property owners protest the formation of
a maintenance district then Council would adopt a-Resolution ordering the
formation of the district and ordering the specified work to be done and
assessments made toward the benefitting property owners as shown on the maps.
The hearing date shown in the Resolution is for the Council meeting of
February, 27, 1984. Appropriate notices are required to be made to the property
owners at least 10 days prior to the hearing date.
AWRENCE McPHERSON
LM:vh
att.
0
RESOLUTION NO. 8-84
RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO
DECLARING IT'S INTENTION TO ORDER THE FORMATION OF A
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS
FOR CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS AND MAINTENANCE PURSUANT T0-
THE PROVISIONS OF THE IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1911
(STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE 5820 THROUGH 5856) AND
SETTING A TIME AND, PLACE FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS THEREON,
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 84-1: SAN FERNANDO ROAD
WHEREAS, this City Council has considered the formation of a
Maintenance District pursuant to the provisions of the Streets
and Highways Code of the State of California to be known and
designated as Maintenance District 84-1: San Fernando Road, here-
inafter referred to as the District.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO
RESOLVES as follows:
Section 1. Recitals
That the above recitals are true and correct.
Section 2. Public Interest
That the public interest and convenience requires, and it is
the intention of this City Council to order the formation of a
MaintenanceDistrict to levy and collect annual assessments for
the continual maintenance of certain streets in the City, all to
serve and benefit said District as said area is shown and deline-
ated on a map hereby approved by this City Council and on file
with the office of the Public Works Director, open for public
inspection and herein so referenced and made a part hereof.
Section 3. Assessment
That the public interest and convenience requires, and it is
the intention of this City Council to order the formation of a '
Maintenance District as described in this Resolution, and further
it is determined to `be within the best _public interest and con-
venience to levy and collect annual assessments to pay the cost
and expenses of said maintenance and improvements "as estimated by
the Public Works Director. His estimate of the annual 'assessment
to pay the cost and expenses are as follows:
Construct a :paved access road with a width of 161 . Estimated
annual assessment for the first year is $1,128 per lot,
$3,384 per lot APN 49-271-15 with annual maintenance cost
of $20 thereafter.
Resolution No. 8-84
• Section 4. Description of Maintenance
The improvements for which said Maintenance District is to be
formed and the assessments levied and collected shall be for the
maintenance of those streets contained within the boundaries of
the District and reflected upon the map of the District, attached
as Exhibit "A" .
Section 5. County Auditor
The County Auditor shall enter on the County assessment roll
the amount of the assessments and shall collect said assessments.
After collection by the County the net amount of the assessments,
after the deduction of any compensation due to the City for col-
lection, shall be paid to the Treasurer for the purpose of paying
costs and expenses of said District.
Section 6. Special Fund
The City Treasurer shall establish a special fund known as
"City of Atascadero Street Maintenance District 84-1:San Fernando
Road Maintenance Fund" , in which the said Treasurer shall place
all monies collected by the tax collector. As soon as the monies
have been received by the Treasurer, payment shall be made out of
. said fund only for the purpose provided for in this Resolution
and in order to expedite the making of this maintenance and
improvement work the City Council may transfer into said special
fund, money from any available source, such funds as it shall
deem necessary to expedite the proceedings. Any funds so trans-
ferred shall be deemed a loan to said special fund and shall be
repaid out of the proceeds of the assessment provided for in this
Resolution.
Section 7. Boundaries of District
The said contemplated maintenance and improvement work is,
in the opinion of this City Council, of direct benefit to the
properties within the boundaries of the District, and this
Council makes the cost and expenses of said improvement and main-
tenance and to be further assessed to pay the cost and expenses
thereof. Said Maintenance District shall include each and every
parcel of land within the boundaries of said District as it is
shown on a map, attached as Exhibit "A" as approved by this City
Council and on file in the Office of the Public Works Director ,
and so designated by name of the District.
Section 8. Public Property
Any lots or parcels of land as public property, in the same
as defined in 22663 of Division 15 , Part 2 of the Streets and
• Highways Code, which are included within the boundaries of the
Maintenance District, shall be omitted and exempt from any as-
sessment to be made under these proceedings to cover any of the
costs and expenses of said maintenance and improvement work.
Resolution No. 8-84
Section 9. Public Hearin
Notice is hereby given that Monday, the 27th day of February,
1984, at the hour of 7 :30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the
City Council, being the regular meeting place of said Council, is
the time and place fixed by this City Council for the hearing of
protests or objections in reference to the formation of the pro-
posed District, to the extent of the maintenance work or improve-
ments, and any other matters contained in this Resolution. Any
person who wishes to object to the formation of the District
should file a written protest with the City Clerk prior to the
time set and scheduled for said public hearing. Said hearing
shall not be less than ten or more than thirty days after the
date of the adoption of this Resolution.
Section 10. Notice - Advertisement
That the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to
publish a copy of this Resolution in the Atascadero News, a news-
paper of general circulation in this City. The publication shall
not be completed less than ten (10) days before the date of the
hearing.
Section 11. Notice by Mail
The City Clerk is hereby directed to mail notices of the .
public hearing on the formation of the District indicating time,
place and purpose of the hearing by mail to each owner whose name
and address appear on the last equalized assessment roll. In
addition, the City Clerk shall cause a copy of this Resolution to
be posted in three (3) conspicuous public places within the City.
Notice shall be posted not less than ten (10) days prior to the
date set for the hearing.
Section 12. Effective Date
This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its
adoption.
Section 13. Proceedings Inquiries
For any and all information relating to the proceedings,
protests procedure, any documentation and/or information of a
procedural or technical nature, your attention is directed to the
below listed person to contact:
Lawrence McPherson
Director of Public Works
City of Atascadero
Post Office Box 747
Atascadero, California 93423
805 - 466-8000
Resolution No. 8-84
• ON MOTION b Councilman and seconded b
Y , Y
Councilman , the foregoing Resolution is hereby
adopted in its entirety on the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ADOPTED:
MARJORIE R. MACKEY, Mayor
ATTEST:
BARBARA NORRI , City Clerk
APPROVED AS T FORM:k APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
ALLEN GRIMES, City AttorneyRAY WARDEN, City
Manager IT Manager
i
A
U T
4-) :1
A tQ N H
c0 .0 U) H
H
H
PC
[--4 2 w u
cn r-A U) a z
H O O -b -,A u
Q 1
_Z1, z C c0 U
wao < :3 a a o
0 z •-i u ,--1
z - P4 U C U) GA
d O W C cG l4
z z C O •C -
z 'd z a `°
H to CO H U) 4-J
1 1 1 1
Ln o
N N M N o .-� C M
I N
r-1 1
oo00 rn
\,
114, CN N N d'
NI 1
1 C m Ql D [``
r 1
O C) O 0�0 C
N 1 r O` N
i
coCN
N co O1, N rn
N _ N. _ —N � i m
1 1 1 ,rn
M �
• —� , co
N — O O
co
i N N 1 1 r-i
tl,
1 r� c 00
cp Ol N N CN
C14 04—"T 1 1 iON
Ln
yCD r-4
1 00
r-4 N
co[` N I
!
r-I 1 d'--►O
CN _ Ln
1 O
`o o
! 1 N
jo
c� LC%
N N
1 � o
o
N
1
C31
ME ET'N V AGENDA
M E M O RA N D U M
TO: Murray
FROM: Larry McPherson
SUBJECT: Unmet Transportation Needs Hearing
DATE: February 2, 1984
On January 12, 1984 the Area Council held its annual "Unmet Transit
Needs" hearing in San Luis Obispo. The attached letter and list from Vic
Kamhi summarizes the requests made by members of the public at that hearing.
Attachment A lists these specific transportation items, with Numbers 1, 4,
9, and 12 directly effecting the City.
It is recommended that Council take an action on each of these items
and directs the Area Council representative to convey the City's position
at the March 1, 1984 meeting.
My recommendations are as follows:
Item 1 Expansion of County Runabout The expansion of this service is re-
quested due to oversubscription by handicapped users. Since this is the
only county-wide handicap access service to medicaltreatment, it is well
used by that segment of the population. The City pays about 11% of the
total system cost, therefore, added cost to the City will be relatively
low. It is recommended that this request be approved.
Item 4 - Continue Atascadero to S.L.O. commute service. This system was
continued on a one year trial over the objections of the City Council and
their Area Council representative. The Area Council conditioned the
test on the system showing an average ridership of over 40 passengers per
day and a farebox return in excess of 45% over the one year test period.
The arguements used by the City against continuation of the system have
not changed and the system, to date, has not met all the test criterion;
therefore, it is recommended Council again take, a position against conti-
nuation of this service. To date, the average passenger count is 32
persons per day for both trips, which translates to 16 People per day using
the bus.
Item 9 - Provide Saturday Dial-A-Ride service. This request has been made
each year for the past 3' years, however, neither this office nor the Dial-
A-Ride contractor has received any indication of a significant request for
that service by present system users.
Using the experience of other Dial-A-Ride operators, it could be ex-
pected that Saturday service would generate 25% or less of the average
weekday ridership, meaning that 50 or less passengers, mostly discount fees,
would be estimated to use the Saturday service.
I project that Saturday service would generate less than $20.00 per
day in revenue, while the total contract and vehicle cost would increase
Unmet Transit Needs
page two
over 10% above our current costs. This means that system costs would
increase on the order of $20,000 per year while generating approximately
$1,000 in income.
We are already operating near the required 10% farebox recovery ratio,
therefore, adding Saturday service may necessitate raising all fares to
maintain ,the required farebox recovery.
It is recommended that Saturday service not be instituted at this time
due to an, insufficient showing of demand or cost effectiveness.
Item 12 - Provide transit service between Paso Robles and Atascadero. This
service is presently being met by private carriers (Greyhound and Taxi);.
There has been absolutely no showing of, a need or demandforthis
service, therefore it is recommended that this request be denied. To my
knowledge, this request was made by E.O.C. staff with no attempt at
justification.
It is recommended that this item not be considered since there is no
showing that this request meets the definition of an "unmet transit need",
specifically no demonstration of being essential for mobility.
On Page 2 of the memo from Area Council staff, there is a listing of
points that are used to determine if identified transit needs are "reasonable
to meet". Since Attachment A of the same memo lists those transit needs
requested by various individuals and organizations, the Area Council then
must use the six criterion for determining that the system implementation is
"reasonable to meet". A negative finding on one or more of these six points
is the basis for rejection or 'delay, in implementing the request for new or
expanded service.
Concerning the request to continue the commute service between Atas-
cadero and San'Luis-Obispo, negative findings can be made of Items b. ,
c. , d. , and f. of the factors used to evaluate "reasonableness to meet".
Concerning Saturday Dial-A-Ride service, negative findings can be made
on Items a., b., c. , d. , and f. of the reasonableness factors.
Transit service between Atascadero and Paso Robles can ,not be classified
as an "unmet need" since there is no showing that this, service is essential
for mobility.
6��MEINCE -McPHERSON
{� San Luis Obis ounty and - ClAes Arroyo Grande
.Atascadero
Grover City
Morro Bay
Area Planning and Coordinating Council Paso Robles
Pismo Beach
San Luis Obispo
® San Luis Obispo County
January 27, 1984
Mayor Marge Mackey
City of Atascadero
P. 0. Box 747
Atascadero, CA.
93422
Honorable Mayor Mackey:
SUBJECT: UNMET TRANSPORTATION NEEDS
On January 12, 1984, the San Luis Obispo County and Cities Planning and
Coordinating Council held their annual public hearings on "Unmet
Transportation Needs" as required by the Transportation Development Act
(TDA). After allocating TDA funds (Local Transportation Funds and State
Transit Assistance Funds) to meet identified unmet transportation needs,
the remaining funds may be expended by local jurisdictions for street and
road purposes. The purposeofthe "Unmet Transportation Needs" hearing is
to determine if there are any unmet public transit needs, and if so, are
they reasonable to meet.
In compliance with the State Administrative regulations, the Area Council
adopted, on February 3, 1983, a revised definition of what an "unmet
transit need" is, and what transit needs are "reasonable to meet". The
definition of an unmet need is as follows:
"Unmet Transit Needs means a deficiency in the current public
transportation or specialized transportation system that is
essential for mobility and is a specifically recommended transit
service in the regional transportation plan and is not yet
implemented or funded, and is as a minimum, consistent with the
recommended regional transit standards."
Your participation is requested on all those items listed on Attachment
A.. We would appreciate any comments or data which you would provide to
help us determine if any of the proposals listed on the attachment are or
are not "needs", based strictly on the definition listed above. Your
response in order to be considered in the staff report should be returned
to us by February 3, 1984. This allows us one week to prepare the staff
report and include your input, mail the staff report to TTAC and CTAC one
week before the committee meeting, and allow the two weeks between the
TTAC meeting and the March 1, 1984 Area Council meeting. We must receive
this information on schedule to ensure that Transportation Development Act
funds (LTF and STA) can be apportioned by the end of the fiscal year.
After the Area Council determines the requests are "unmet needs", they
will consider the "reasonableness" of meeting those needs.
County Government Center, San Luis Obispo, Ca. 93408, (805) 549-5710
Mayor Mackey
January 27, 1984
Page 2
In addition to obtaining your input in determining what requests are unmet
needs we also appreciate your assistance in developing information to help
the Area Council determine the reasonableness of those requests which are
likely to be deemed "unmet transit needs". The means of determining
whether such unmet needs are reasonable to meet will be determined using
the following criteria:
"Unmet transit needs that are reasonable to meet" shall be those
existing transit services which continue to satisfy this
definition, and those unmet transit needs which:
a. Is projected to provide the minimum acceptable farebox
return as defined by the Transportation Development Act
Sections 99268.2 and 99268.5;
b Shall be feasible . to fund within the limits of transit
funds available to the Area Council;
C. Shall be feasible to draw sufficient ridership' to fill
identified system deficiencies that are essential for
mobility and will provide an economy of scale, dependable
service, and enhance overall system cost effectiveness,
both short and long term;
d. Shall have significant support from the community and from
elected officials of the juris- diction(s) to be served;
e. Shall be feasible to perform with dependable transit
equipment presently available in the market place; and
f. Shall be equitable in terms of timing and fairness in light
of all other "unmet transit needs".
We can' t overly stress the importance of your input as these requests may
have financial implications to your entity. As such, please return your
comments by February 8, 1984.
If you have any questions or problems, please give me a call at 549-5710.
Sincerely,
PAUL C. CRAWFORD
Executive Secretary
�c (< :
VICTOR KAMHI
Transportation Planner
cc: Manager/Administrator
Planning Director
Public Works Director/Engineer
Attachment
t
ATTACHMENT A
Issues to be considered as possible
Unmet Transit Needs
1984
Please respond to all items circled.
lO. Expansion of the Runabout (Regional Handicapped Transit) service for
an additional 150 hours per month. Service is countywide.
2. Financial assistance in the amount of $13,420 (including $8,400 for
driver salary) to continue Grass Roots II dial-a-ride service to
seniors throughout the county, but primarily within the city of San
Luis Obispo. The service currently carries approximately 3,000
passengers.
3. Reinstate Saturday service between Los Osos, Morro Bay, and the city
of San Luis Obispo. The service averaged over 60 persons per day
during the 8-month trial period.
OContinue transit service between the cities of Atascadero and San Luis
Obispo, including service to Santa Margarita. The service is carrying
an average of 32 persons per day (with one round trip).
5. Institute transit service between the Five Cities area (Pismo Beach,
Arroyo Grande/Grover City/Oceano) and the city of San Luis Obispo.
6. Institute transit service between the Five Cities area and the city of
San Luis Obispo via Avila Beach, both on weekends and weekdays.
7. Revise the North Coastal Transit schedule to provide some direct
service from Los Osos to downtown San Luis Obispo and Madonna Plaza.
8. Provide a "late1° North Coastal bus from San Luis Obispo to Morro Bay
and Los Osos (6 p.m.).
OProvide Saturday Dial-A-Ride service in Atascadero.
10. Provide Saturday Dial-A-Ride service in Los Osos.
11. Provide a second bus to serve peak demand for the Los Osos .Dial-A-Ride
system.
QTransit service between Paso Robles and Atascadero (in addition to
Greyhound).
13. Hourly service on the Cuesta Shuttle. Also, night service to Cuesta
College from the City of San Luis Obispo.
14. Half-hourly service on the City of San Luis Obispo's transit service
to the South Higuera and Laguna Lake areas.
ms/17/1544
-�cEI1NJ AU--NUA
1f 17EM#
.....
RESOLUTION NO. 11-84
A RESOLUTION OF THE ATASCADERO SANITATION DISTRICT
APPROVING SEWER EXTENSION 1-84 EXTENDING PUBLIC
SEWER SERVICE TO CERTAIN LOTS IN THE HERMOSILLO
AVENUE AREA.
WHEREAS, the Atascadero Sanitation District is empowered by its
regulations to extend service to areas outside of Improvement No. 1;
and,
WHEREAS, the subject area along the northerly side of Hermosillo
Avenue is contiguous to existing Improvement District No.. 1.
WHEREAS, ongoing service to this area along Hermosillo Avenue will
not require substantially higher costs to serve than other areas now
in the District since sewer lines to serve most of the area already
exist.
WHEREAS, a small portion of the area will be required to design
and construct a sewer main extension at their expense prior to con-
nection but it appears feasible to do so.
WHEREAS, itisappropriate to extend public 'sewer service to areas
such as this one which have ident6ified septic system failure
problems.
WHEREAS, a cease and desist order (which encourages hookups to the
sewer system) is now in effect in this area.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Atascadero Sanitation Dis-
trict does hereby approve of the extension of public sewer service to
the following described lots:
Lots 52, 52A, 53A, 64D, 64E, 64F, 64G, 64H, 65B, 65C, 65D, 65E,
65H, 65J, 65K, 65L, 70B, 70C, 70D, 70E, 70F of Block NC
On moton by Board Member and seconded by Board
Member , the foregoing resolution is adopted in
its entirety by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Resolution No. 11-�
DATE ADOPTED:
MARJORIE MACKEY, Mayor
ATTEST:
BARBARA NORRIS, ity Clerk
APPROVED AS TO RM:--
ALLEN
M:ALLEN GRIMES, City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
MURRAY L. WARDEN, City Manager;
2
_ CITY OF ATASCADERO
191816 A 1978
Planning Department February 14, 1984
STAFF REPORT
SUBJECT: SEWER EXTENSION 1-84
LOCATION: Hermosillo Avenue (Lots 52, 52A, 53A, 64D, 64E, 64F, 64G,
64H, 65B, 65C, 65D, 65E, 65H, 65J, 65K, 65L, 70B, 70C,
70D, 70E, 70F of Block NC)
APPLICANT: Initiated by City
REQUEST: To allow certain parcels outside of Sewer Improvement
District No. 1 to connect to the public sewer.
BACKGROUND
1. Reason for Request: The Public Works and Planning Departments
have been contacted by a number of Hermosillo Avenue property own-
ers about connecting to the public sewer which now exists at the
• frontage of most of the affected parcels. After these expressions
of interest, Staff determined, based upon particular conditions
applicable to this area, that it would be more logical to initiate
the service extension for the whole area rather than to process
individual requests.
2. General Plan: High Density Single Family Residential
3. Zoning: RSF-X
4. Environmental Determination: The Planning Director has determined
that this project is categorically exempt from provisions of the
California Environmental Quality Act.
5 . Existing Area Conditions: The attached map shows that 11 lots on
the northerly side of Hermosillo Avenue are within Improvement
District No. 1 while the remaining 21 are not. Sewer lines exist
in Hermosillo Avenue generally easterly of Lot 65E indicating that
13 of the 21 lots front directly on the sewer . The remaining 8
lots do not front directly on the sewer and would require either
easements or engineering designs prior to actual connection. Sev-
eral affected parcels are now under construction or have plans in
the permit process. The topography and the lot sizes present ser-
ious constraints for individual private sewage disposal systems.
This area has been identified as one with septic system failures
by the Regional Water Quality Control Board "cease and desist"
order.
Sewer Extension 1-80 Hermosillo Avenue)
6. Project Description: It is proposed that 21 lots be allowed to
connect to the public sewer . Most could do so immediately al-
though several of the lots would have to extend the sewer main
prior to connection.
STAFF ANALYSIS AND COMMENTS
The Sanitation District Board of Directors adopted policies pertaining
to sewer service extensions outside of Improvement District No. 1 on
November 14 , 1983.
It seems logical that areas such as Hermosillo Avenue should be al-
lowed to connect to public sewers especially where sewer lines to
serve most of the parcels already exist, where septic system failures
are occurring, where new development is occurring and where parcel
sizes are small. The Hermosillo area has these constraints and sat-
isfies recently adopted Board criteria.
It should, however, be pointed out that several of the affected lots
(65B, 65C, 65D, 70B, 70C, 70D, 70E, 70F) would either have to secure
easements through parcels on the southerly side of the street to con-
nect to a sewer line leading to San Jacinto Avenue or would have to
design and construct a main extension prior to connection. Prelimin-
ary review indicates that either approach is feasible.
•
FINDINGS
1. The subject area along the northerly side of Hermosillo Avenue is
contiguous to existing Improvement District No. 1.
2. Ongoing service to this area along Hermosillo Avenue will not re-
quire substantially higher costs to serve then other areas now in
the District since sewer lines to serve most of the area already
exist.
3. A small portion of the area will be required to design and con-
struct a sewer main extension at their expense prior to connec-
tion, but it appears feasible to do so.
4. It is appropriate to extend public sewer service to areas such as
this one which have identified septic system failure problems.
5. A cease and desist order which encourages hookups to the sewer sys-
tem , is now in effect in this area.
i
2
Sewer Extension 1-840ermosillo Avenue)
RECOMMENDATION
• Based upon the Findings, the Planning and Public Works Directors rec-
ommend approval of Sewer extension 1-84 and adoption of Resolution
No. 11-84 extending public service to Lots 52, 52A, 53A, 64D, 64E,
64F, 64G, 64H, 65B, 65C, 65D, 65E, 65H, 65J, 65K, 65L, 70B, 70C, 70D,
70E and 70F of Block NC of Atascadero Colony.
REPORT PREPARED/APPROVED BY: /�O� 16,'"
LAWRENCE STEVENS
.Planning Director
LAWRENCE McPherson
Public Works Director
ps
•
3
O y 3N 5l°19'E m
OD
O C
I•y<� !Lj//ye// , �N4rA76
�`° � -s �Z♦1 73 p9 E� L
w O�a LQ N351gE�N s
Ods EM f.
O
4
-
OW
E
Elf
mO. 4 �. 2 � _ • 1t5
5s{ F �`- ass DO O 361 sb M
a L o\Q o?- .O O O +�QD > O �o .°d_O u• � 1 � % 94 Yq.
ttt
m/
\ � o yL Om o 4�'yE <Li7vi
rof� \ 1a D b 6 O m ♦ I 9e
IpA'E r
1 9t t 9:0
• � 6t0'�a B Ly P 8,E I �.
fr c ON \L 9gIQh$<gq qY.
y Ts.eh6 a O fore ® \yq8 O',iI�ati0�, Qo tp
\ _
s,w \6 a 09 ! 73
0_ IB v \ P,f6 15 49P% I q}'P y4 e
f _
5+• — ; • 'E
3 �,61• 9PO` � O 4, 6t ��°e>'E ,P.O .$ .trl�
4973
M�"' �• m e
o-. r 4BGO b�Nn l..O��O 4BL
j[ 1 !. 'tl �9 40� C+O 'EBF
,`s Pa,s PM 20-I6 ia. Tp�- E` q 50 E O 9 10
NV
'1` B
60G 64F B r / N 48E �4BD �480a 488 4BA��48
(R n'O X i t 3r � 3 AVE.H<['•
66 Y N
A 'END EN °pR >.
64B e ; 47.
\r� ; Z
^ P 6<L 32 Q ' {�eO + 64A ��47G 47F �47E �47D 470 478�
0 f `1 35�E a 6
t n `■ PMYT 97 iia.r 6B � 44 N •` b 160.M 40 116.19
4-62A
FRAC
lyc
x s i v 4'• � �ml SJ 2 <IJTS
c O O a 6 N IB °°fit NR i� 44L a 44P1 -q
4 i y p 3 �1y
AMENDMEN P. pl ,
21
fit
44,1
o� '
Si P
E
(��1E 63A 67"."e �'I
e 1 68A O _ i5 N s/PP
``1 V ` O 16 '1{O
I 27 00 446
■ 50 NCj a IB .E \ /< y
Y 6 a1 w EP N 31'st OP O70' N,p°OSE
u
d]2
N ss m E t° 6qG
709 Z
w O
660 20 69A r
66 A m IID/,•� °)P% -
AME DMENT
TOA 17
m
<
4
AG
• SA ,`! 4.16► .rm �� ��`
"r fC�JAC7TITCf-
4�E14