Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRDA Agenda Packet 052306CITY OF ATASCADERO COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA Tuesday, May 23, 2006 **NOTE SPECIAL TIME** 5:30 P.M. City Hall Council Chambers 6907 EI Camino Real Atascadero, California REGULAR SESSION: 5:30 P.M. ROLL CALL: Chairperson Clay Vice Chairperson Luna Board Member O'Malley Board Member Pacas Board Member Scalise APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Roll Call COMMUNITY FORUM: (This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wanting to address the Board on any matter not on this agenda and over which the Board has jurisdiction. Speakers are limited to five minutes. Please state your name and address for the record before making your presentation. The Board may take action to direct the staff to place.a matter of business on a future agenda. A maximum of 30 minutes will be allowed for Community Forum, unless changed by the Board.) BOARD ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS: (On their own initiative, the Board Members may make a brief announcement or a brief report on their own activities. Board Members may ask a question for clarification, make a referral to staff or take action to have staff place a matter of business on a future agenda. The Board may take action on items listed on the Agenda.) A. CONSENT CALENDAR: 1. Community Redevelopment Agency Minutes — April 25, 2006 • Board Secretary Recommendation: Board approve the Community Redevelopment Agency minutes of April 25, 2006. [Board Secretary] B. MANAGEMENT: 1. Downtown Parking Study Report / Action Plan and Guiding Principles ■ Fiscal Impact: None at this time. • Recommendations: Board: 1. Receive the Downtown Study Area Report; and, 2. Approve the Downtown Parking Action Plan and Guiding Principles as proposed. [Executive Director] 2. Creek Bank Restoration Project • Fiscal Impact: None at this time. • Recommendations: Board: 1. Certify the attached Project Mitigated Negative Declaration; and, 2. Approve the project components and authorize the call for bids. [Public Works] 3. Determination for Low/Moderate Income Housing Fund ■ Fiscal Impact: None at this time. l / • Recommendation: Board adopt the Draft Resolution determining that the planning and administrative expenses funded from the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund were necessary for the production, improvement, and/or preservation of affordable housing for low and moderate income households. [Executive Director] C. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT: Wade McKinney, Executive Director D. ADJOURNMENT ITEM NUMBER: RA A-1 DATE: 05/23/06 a9 91 1 9, leis 1979 11111 CITY OF ATASCADERO COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DRAFT MINUTES Tuesday, April 25, 2006 6:30 P.M. REGULAR SESSION: 6:30 P.M. Chairperson Clay called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. ROLL CALL: Present: Board Members O'Malley, Pacas, Scalise, Luna and Chairperson Clay Absent: None Others Present: Board Secretary Marcia McClure Torgerson, Recording Secretary Grace Pucci Staff Present: Executive Director Wade McKinney, Assistant Executive Director Jim Lewis, Public Works Director Steve Kahn, Community Development Director Warren Frace, Community Services Director Brady Cherry, Police Chief John Couch, Deputy Public Works Director Geoff English and City Attorney Patrick Enright. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: MOTION: By Board Member O'Malley and seconded by Vice Chairperson Luna to approve the agenda. Motion passed 5:0 by a roll -call vote. RDA Draft Minutes 04/25/06 Page 1 of 3 COMMUNITY FORUM: None BOARD ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS: None A. CONSENT CALENDAR: 1. Community Redevelopment Agency Minutes — March 28, 2UUb • Board Secretary Recommendation: Board approve the Community Redevelopment Agency minutes of March 28, 2006. [Board Secretary] 2. Main Street Annual Report • Fiscal Impact: None. ■ Recommendation: Board receive Annual Report. [Executive Director] 3. City Parking Lot Funding Allocations • Description: City parking lot located on East Mall, across the street from the Historic City Hall. ■ Fiscal Impact: $60,000 of the budgeted funds from the Historic City Hall Parking Lot Project. • Recommendation: Board authorize the Executive Director to accept an easement from the Atascadero Unified School District (AUSD) over Lot 3 of Amendment D of Atascadero Colony, accept ownership of the portable units on the Lot, and pay $60,000.00 to the AUSD. [Public Works] Items pulled: Eric Greening, Item #A-2. MOTION: By Board Member O'Malley and seconded by Vice Chairperson Luna to approve Items #A-1 and 3. Motion passed 5:0 by a roll -call vote. Item #A-2: Eric Greening asked several questions regarding the Main Street Annual Report including the status of the request to remove Planning Commission review of projects of 10,000 square feet or less and the status of the fagade improvement program. Board Member O'Malley explained that the funds for the fagade improvement program have been redirected to lighting for the downtown. RDA Draft Minutes 0425/06 Page 2 of 3 Steve Martin, Executive Director Atascadero Main Street explained that the Main Street Board and members were very supportive of using the fagade improvement funds for lighting in the downtown. Board Member O'Malley suggested agendizing Main Street's letter of request on the Strategic Planning Session in June. There was Board consensus to agendize Main Street's requests for discussion at the June Strategic Planning Session. MOTION: By Board Member O'Malley and seconded by Board Member Scalise to approve Item #A-2. Motion passed 5:0 by a roll -call vote. B. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT: Wade McKinney, Executive Director None C. ADJOURNMENT Chairperson Clay adjourned the meeting at 6:37 p.m. MINUTES PREPARED BY: Grace Pucci, Recording Secretary RDA Draft Minutes 04/25/06 . .Page 3 of 3 ITEM NUMBER: RA B-1 DATE: 05/23/06 Community Redevelopment Agency of Atascadero Staff Report - Executive Director Downtown Parking Study Report Action Plan and Guiding Principles RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. Receive the Downtown Study Area Report; and, 2. Approve the Downtown Parking Action Plan and Guiding Principles as proposed. DISCUSSION: Background: On or about August 9, 2005, the Agency Board approved the hiring of Carl Walker, Inc. to provide parking study consultant services to analyze parking issues in the downtown. City staff met with the consultant to prepare a Project Schedule prior to the commencement of the work. Parking inventory counts, and parking occupancy and turnover fieldwork was conducted on October 18, 19, 20, 22 and 23, 2005. Pubic workshops were held on: October 20, 2005: Introduction and Initial Public Input Session ➢ November 9, 2005: Conduct Stakeholder Group Interviews: o Main Street/Local Business o Property Owners o Developers/Real Estate Representatives +� o Chamber of Commerce o City and Government Representatives ➢ December 14, 2005: Following distribution of the Draft Study for public review, a final workshop was held during which the public had an opportunity to comment on the Draft Report. CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the Downtown Parking Study Report be received, and that the Downtown Action Plan be adopted. A copy of full Parking Study Report is on file and available for review from the City Clerk. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Take no action. 2. Instruct Staff to revise the Downtown Parking Action Plan as direct by the Board. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Downtown Parking Action Plan 2. Downtown Parking Study - Executive Summary ii Attachment 1: Action Plan City of Atascadero Parking Utilization And Management Study - Action Plan May 2006 Prepared for.• The City of Atascadero 6907 El Camino Real Atascadero, CA 93422 Prepared by.• Carl Walker, Inc. / v City of Atascadero Califorma Packivg'U:tilization.and;iVlana ement 5hidy—Action.P.lan 'May 2006 Downtown ParkingStudy Action Short -Term (Within the Next Twelve Months): A-1. Develop and approve a set of Guiding Principles for downtown parking. The Guiding Principles will guide the future development of the downtown parking system, as well as provide reasonable constraints within which future parking issues can be addressed. A proposed version of the Guiding Principles is included at the end of this action plan (pages 8 and 9). A-2. Steps should be taken to begin investigating options to generate sufficient revenue to fund future parking projects, such as parking in -lieu fees. Once recommendations are made, steps should be taken to include the provision in the city zoning code as soon as possible. A-3. Designate a single city department as responsible for downtown parking management. While the actual operation, maintenance and planning of the system may be handled by several city departments, the system will appear to ' have a single responsible department. A-4. Improve downtown parking signage. Incorporate parking signage in any new downtownsignage plans. Way -finding signs should be located on incoming streets to direct visitors to available parking supplies. Parking lots should have identifying signage that includes user group restrictions. On -street parking signs should remind users they are intended for short-term visitors. A-5. Ensure adequate pedestrian paths exist to and from parking areas. A-6. Update the Downtown Parking Ordinance to address the following: Any parking deficits created by small in -fill developments could be covered through the usage of in -lieu fees to fund the construction of future public parking. However, if the development is substantial and will require a large number of parking spaces (50 or more spaces), at least a portion of the required parking spaces should be provided on-site by the developer. This will help ensure sufficient parking is provided overall, but also help ensure close, accessible parking is provided. The remaining portion could be covered through the use of in -lieu fees and public parking. For larger projects, a minimum of 25% of the required parking should be provided by the developer on-site. A-7. Work with private off-street parking facilities near the Carlton Hotel to provide some long-term employee parking. Possible locations are the off-street parking lot in Block 21, the existing Old City Hall surface lot and the St. Williams 2 r Ci 'A 'dero, California May 2006 Church. Encourage valet parking in the Carlton Hotel parking lot on the northwest corner of Traffic Way and El Camino Real. A-8. Designate more long-term parking downtown for employees. Long-term parking should be provided in off-street parking lots and underutilized on -street parking spaces. Ideally, these spaces would be located more on the perimeter of downtown, with the parking located closer to downtown destinations reserved for short-term visitor parking. This should include eliminating the use of the Old City Hall surface lot as a parking and ride facility. A-9. Continue improving lighting levels in downtown parking areas and major pedestrian paths. Work with community stakeholders to improve both real and perceived safety levels in parking areas and on pedestrian pathways. Parking areas should provide a minimum of 2.0 footcandles per square foot. A-10. Work with downtown businesses to determine loading and delivery needs. For example, loading and delivery zones are needed around the businesses located on Entrada and for the Carlton. Where possible designate specific loading zones, and determine adequate hours for delivery vehicle parking. Loading zones could be /"IN used for short-term visitor parking after designated loading zone hours. 10'%, A-11. With respect to new developments, attempt to better utilize existing parking supplies prior to designing and constructing new parking areas. There is currently enough unused parking to more than accommodate projected parking needs. The city should work with private parking lot owners to better utilize existing supplies, to the benefit of the city, developers and the private lot owners. A-12. Develop a parking marketing program to include information for downtown visitors and businesses. Create downtown parking maps, detailing on -street and off-street parking supplies. Include downtown parking information on the City of Atascadero website, and encourage other downtown organizations to include parking information. Create lines of communication between the city and downtown businesses concerning parking issues. 3 STD � O'lfM�. City 1 Atascadeto,California Miy ° � ���yw P.aclungUtilization.:and:.Management.Study—Actiou:P.lan 11 �K Mid -Term (Year .Two): B-1. Conduct an in-house downtown land use survey, GIS mapping, and update annually as necessary. B-2'. Conduct an update of the parking inventory and occupancy surveys contained in the full Parking Utilization and Management Study. These counts should be updated as necessary (when new developments occur), and updates should be conducted annually at a minimum. B-3. Provide improved support for alternative modes of transportation. Provide bicycle racks, comfortable pedestrian paths, bike paths, etc. in downtown to encourage a pedestrian first mentality. A marketing campaign could be created to encourage people to walk, bike, carpool, vanpool, or use public transit to travel downtown. B-4. Should average short-term parking duration beginto exceed posted time limits, additional steps will be necessary to deter excessive parking. These steps could include parking enforcement or a combination of parking enforcement and paid parking. B-5. While comprehensive parking enforcement may not be necessary at this time, develop a system to monitor on -street parking turnover through periodic duration/turnover surveys and community "policing". Develop a notice that can be placed on vehicles to remind there of the two-hour time limits. B-6. If area private parking lot owners are unwilling to work with the city, or the number of spaces required cannot be achieved using this approach, then the city should look to improving existing parking capacities or adding new.surface lots. The costs associated with surface lot improvement or construction are far less than parking garage construction. The city should ensure all surface options are explored prior to moving forward with garage designs. Also, the city should view the creation of surface parking as land banking, and not as a permanent downtown parking solution. As the downtown continues to develop, and new developments are constructed on available parcels (typically surface parking lots), parking structures may be needed to provide for future parking demands. n 11 Lone -Term (Years Three and Later): C-1. Develop additional surface parking supplies. The lots should be placed and sized appropriately, using the parking `supply and demand analysis methodology detailed in the full parking study -report. C-2. The creation of downtown structured parking, should be viewed as an option for the future. Today, a downtown parking garage will likely not be financially viable, relative to the revenues and expenses generated. However, a garage may be the only available option should the city decide to provide. convenient parking for developments without the assistance of private parking lot owners. The value of a parking garage could extend beyond the revenues it generates by providing an incentive for downtown development. C-3. Ideally, the development of a downtown parking garage would coincide with the development(s) it is serving. Building a parking garage with the hope of attracting downtown development should only occur if sufficient downtown development warrants. Should developments not occur, a garage built on speculation could result in a severely underutilized facility. If a developer is interested in developing a portion of downtown, and sufficient.parking supplies cannot be provided using other methods, then the city could propose providing the necessary parking along with the construction of the development. C-4. If significant public parking development occurs, the city will need to change how it views downtown parking management. To fund new public parking facilities and encourage use, there would need to be a charge in place for on -street parking. Theoretically, the charge for parking should be such that it encourages short-term parking on the street and encourages long-term parking in off-street lots. It may be difficult to achieve community buy -off for the creation of paid on -street parking. Even if there is a fee for on -street parking, there will still be an ample amount of free off-street parking in private parking'lots. Once fees are put into place for parking, other management issues will arise such as parking validation programs, reserved parking, greater parking enforcement responsibilities, etc. This may necessitate the creation of a city department charged with the management of the parking system. C-5. As the downtown parking system may not generate sufficient funds to fully pay for downtown public parking facilities, other revenue streams should be explored. First, the city could seek the use of tax increment financing in the future. This would be a way to fund parking system expansion, and is used by many communities today. Second, the city could team with downtown developers in �—y funding public parking facilities. Assuming the demand patterns are favorable, a + ' multi -use facility could help reduce city expenses. Finally, the city could create a parking fee charged to downtown developers to help fund the additional parking facilities. W Citvof Atascadero, California P.axking Utilization and'1VIana" ement Study—.ActionT'lan may 11 WMII lt-99.1 City of Atascadero Downtown Parking Guiding Principles (DRAFT) 1. In order to encourage the continued economic development of downtown Atascadero, the City of Atascadero will endeavor to provide and/or designate necessary short-term and long-term parking for downtown businesses and visitors. 2. In order to construct and operate public parking facilities, the City of Atascadero will investigate funding options that may include a combination of parking fees, special assessments and/or parkin -lieu fees charged to downtown developers. Downtown parking be self funding to the highest degree possible. ^ 3. The city will "designate a single department to be responsible for the maintenance and management of the public parking system, and no other city department will be authorized to construct, designated, operate or manage parking spaces/facilities. The department will also be responsible for assisting with the allocation of available parking spaces among the downtown user groups. 4. Parking fees charged to downtown parkers (e.g. employees, visitors, etc.) in public parking areas will be designated by the city, with input from the city department responsible for the parking system. Any parking fees charged will be reviewed annually to ensure all financial goals/objectives are met. Parking fees will be used to help support the parking system. 5. The city department responsible for the parking system will be included in future downtown development projects to ensure parking related concerns are addressed. The department will be responsible for managing parking losses/gains due to downtown development. ri = of Atascadero, California May 2006 6. Parking rules and regulations will be set by the department responsible for the parking system, with approval as necessary from the City Council, and these rules/regulations will be clearly communicated to downtown user groups via printed materials and the Internet. 7. Parking enforcement will be provided by the City of Atascadero Police Department when needed. Parking fines should be set to discourage illegal parking. 8. Special event parking needs will be coordinated by the department responsible for the parking system when needed. Full cost recovery for special event parking should be considered. 9. The City should review any Downtown Parking related budgets on a bi-annual basis. YJ Attachment 2Executive Summary City of Atascadero Parking Utilization And Management Study — Executive Summary May 2006 Prepared for: The City of Atascadero 6907 El Camino Real Atascadero, CA 93422 Prepared by. Carl Walker, Inc. of Atascadero, California May 2006 Introduction The primary purpose of this parking study was to determine short-term and long-term recommendations to improve parking in downtown Atascadero. The parking study initially evaluated existing conditions, determined primarily through parking occupancy and duration surveys and stakeholder/public input meetings. The examination of existing conditions provided the base data from which future development, with its impact on parking supply and demand, could be evaluated. Then future parking adequacies were calculated based on the likelihood of projected downtown developments. Finally, parking alternatives are considered to address future needs, including the possibility of additional parking in downtown. The study area is roughly bounded by the Junior High School to the north, Highway 101 to the south (except for the Atascadero Bible Church and St. William's Church), Morro Road to the east (including the Vons Center) and Rosario Avenue to the west. Current Parking Supply and Demand A064k Current Parking Supply The downtown has a total parking supply of 3,020 parking spaces within the study area. Of these, 2,561 parking spaces (or 85%) are in off-street parking lots and 459 spaces (15%) are located on -street. The on -street parking inventory includes both marked parking spaces and locations were on -street parking is possible but not currently marked. The amount of non -marked on -street parking was estimated by Carl Walker based on block face lengths and acceptable street widths. Some parking areas could not be accurately inventoried, as they lacked parking stripes or the existing stripes were unrecognizable. In these situations, parking inventories were estimated based on the size of the parking area. Current Parking Demand The overall peak period of parking occupancy occurred at 12:00 p.m. on Wednesday, October 19, 2005. During this period, a total of 1,138 parking spaces were occupied during the survey period. This level of usage translates into 37.7% of the total parking supply. During the peak period of parking occupancy approximately 42.3% of the on - street parking supply and 36.9% of the off-street parking supply was occupied. Parking demand was greater during the week than on weekends, primarily due to the existing mix, of land uses downtown (e.g. amount of medical and general office space). r"1 dero, California CZ of , ism a tll^ 4y'.j ; s Parkin `";Utiliiation and;Management<Stndy=xec.Summan May 11 Current Parking Adequacy Based on the effective parking supply of the study area, there is currently a parking surplus of 1,580 spaces or approximately 58% of the effective supply. It is important to note however that while a significant parking surplus exists, most of the parking is private and use is restricted. Of the total off-street and on -street parking supply in the study area, only approximately 18.8% (or 567 spaces) is public parking, with the remaining 81.2% (or 2,453 spaces) of the parking supply restricted to private parking (e.g. employee only, customer only, etc.) At the peak parking period, 46.9% of the public parking supply and 34.9% of the private parking supply -were utilized. Future Parking Supply and Demand Current Development Projects Currently, the City of Atascadero has four future development projects in the planning stages. These projects include residential, retail, office, and government projects. The potential developments are as follows: 1. Mixed -Use Development on Traffic Way — A commercial/residential development is planned that would include three new buildings. 2. Entrada/El Camino Real Commercial Building — A two-story building is planned that would include over 4,000 square feet of office space. The project would include the creation of 25 parking spaces. 3. Historic Printery Building Rehabilitation —The historic Printery building will be reconditioned to be used for community events and other special events. The project would include the creation of a parking lot to serve the building, as well as a landscaped entertainment garden. 4. Colony Square — Colony Square is a large mixed-use development planned for the northwest corner of El Camino Real and Morro Road. N Im of Atascadero, California May 2006 Future Parking Adequacy Each of the aforementioned development projects will impact existing parking supplies and demand. The following table illustrates the projected parking supply and demand impact of each projected development project.. Project Projected Parking Parking Supply Zone Parking Parking Surplus/Deficit After Demand Impact of Project Surplus Development 1.5 spaces per Residence Existing Surplus - 8 spaces for Residences = Traffic Way Mixed Use Development plus Commercial +5 spaces 152 space surplus 144 spaces surplus (minus Commercial Demand Demand) Existing Surplus -16 spaces for Office Entrada/EI Camino Real Commercial 4 per 1,000 of Office +25 spaces 107 space surplus Demand + 25 new spaces = 116 space Building Space, or 16 spaces surplus To Be Determined, based To Be Detemtined, To Be Determined, based on Land Uses and Historic Printery Building Rehabilitation on Land Uses and Square but New Parking will 94 space surplus New Parking Created Footage be Created Adjusted Peak Parking Existing Surplus - 269 (weekday) Demand Projected 983 space surplus arte ] -or (weekend) demand for Colony Squ 184 Colony Square Development Estimated at 269 spaces -184 spaces (weekday) and lost spaces = 530 space surplus (weekday) during day and up to 454 1,132 (weekend) and 494 space surplus (weekend) during weekends Overall, none of the development projects currently anticipated by the City of Atascadero will result in the development of negative parking adequacies in any parking zone. Planning for Future Parking Needs In order to address future parking needs not currently anticipated, Carl Walker recommends the following: • Complete a comprehensive land use survey for downtown Atascadero. • Maintaining current parking space inventories and conducting parking occupancy counts (ideally at least annually). CitV ofAtascadero, California May 2006 • Project the parking needs of each proposed development using existing city parking requirements. Determine how parking demand for the new development will fluctuate during the day by using the shared parking model provided by the Urban Land Institute. • Use the concept of shared parking to ensure the efficient use of available parking supplies (especially for mixed-use developments). Using the shared parking model reduces the amount of parking needed for a mixed-use development, as the effect of sharing parking requires fewer spaces than the sum of the parking needed for the individual land uses. • Once parking demands have been projected, determine how the development will impact existing conditions. • Any parking deficits created by small in -fill developments could be covered through the usage of in -lieu fees to fund the construction of public parking. However, if the development is substantial and will require a large number of parking spaces (50 or more spaces), at least a portion of the required parking spaces should be provided on-site by the developer. For larger projects, a minimum of 25% of the required parking should be provided by the developer on- site. • While the parking demand for many land uses can be spread over greater distances, the creation of residential space should include sufficient adjacent parking. • Insure sufficient short-term and long-term parking is provided. Discourage the use of incompatible parking uses, such as park and ride, within the downtown. Park and ride facilities should be located outside of the downtown. N ME ofAtascadero, Califomia Parking Alternatives Analysis To meet future parking demands, several •options are available to the city: May 2006 • The city could decide to work with private parking lot owners within the impact areas to better utilize existing parking supplies. Using the concept of shared parking, existing. parking resources could be more effectively utilized to meet needs. • The city could create additional parking spaces (either on -street or off-street) to provide additional downtown parking. New parking spaces could be created on the perimeter of the downtown in existing unimproved areas and/or existing parking areas could be improved or expanded. Downtown employees could be required to park in perimeter surface lots. • The city could require new downtown developments to provide sufficient parking. New developments would provide their own parking for employees and visitors. • The city could utilize a combination of alternatives. Carl Walker recommends the city use a combination of the alternatives listed above. This alternative would involve the city working with private parking lot owners to better utilize the existing parking surplus before adding additional parking supplies. If sufficient parking could not be secured using this approach, then the city would consider improving existing parking supplies and/or adding new supplies as appropriate. If new parking were added, either through surface lots or on -street spaces, the city could look to developers to help defray at least some of the costs (if possible). Also, this approach will allow the city to show the community that all options were explored prior to expending city funds for building a parking facility. With respect to improving the efficiency and utilization of downtown parking supplies, the existing Old City Hall surface parking lot on East Mall and Lewis Avenue could provide additional parking supplies. This lot is currently utilized as an unofficial park r� and ride lot, with people parking and then using the nearby bus stop to board buses to f 1 other locations (not visiting or working in downtown). Due to the location of this parking of Atascadero, California May 2006 lot in downtown, the use of this area as a park and ride lot should be discouraged through parking restrictions (e.g. time limits) and a relocation of the bus stop. This parking lot could then be used to provide additional long-term parking and additional construction . parking (especially with the renovation of the Old City Hall). Additional park and ride parking is currently available in an official park and ride lot north of the study area (on Morrow Road). Should the city decide to create public parking facilities in the future, funds will be necessary to pay for development and construction expenses. One option for funding future parking expenses could involve requiring developers to pay an in -lieu fee. This could be a specific development fee or a typical in -lieu fee. Many municipalities across California use in -lieu fees such as Berkeley, Carmel, Manhattan Beach, Palm Springs, San Rafael and Palo Alto just to name a few. These fees typically allow developers to pay the city for the right to not create parking for their development. The city would then use the funds to create public parking facilities in the future, when needed. Parking Management Strategies The purpose of providing parking management strategies is to help improve downtown parking conditions, both currently and in the future. The parking management options detailed are recommended in order to improve parking efficiency and meet future needs. Guiding Principles Having a well -crafted set of parking principles establishes the goals and objectives that will ultimately define the character of downtown parking. Having established these principles, the community will know what is expected, and hopefully, have had the opportunity to be involved in the definition of the downtown parking principles. City of Atascadero — Downtown Parking Guiding Principles (DRAFT) 1. In order to encourage the continued economic development of downtown Atascadero, the City of Atascadero will endeavor to provide and/or designate necessary short-term and long-term parking for downtown businesses and visitors. 2. In order to construct/operate public parking facilities, the City of Atascadero will secure necessary funds through a combination of taxes, parking fees, special assessments and/or park in -lieu fees charged to downtown developers. l� Cij of Atascadero, California May 2006 3. The city will designate a single department to be responsible for the maintenance and management of the public parking system, and no other city department will be authorized to construct, designated, operate or manage parking spaces/facilities. The department will also be responsible for assisting with the allocation of available parking spaces among the downtown user groups. 4. Parking fees charged to downtown parkers (e.g. employees, visitors, etc.) in public parking areas will be designated by the city, with input from the city department responsible for the parking system. Any parking fees charged will be reviewed annually to ensure all financial goals/objectives are met. Parking fees will be used to help support the parking system. 5. The city department responsible for the parking system will be included in future downtown development projects to ensure parking related concerns are addressed. The department will be responsible for managing parking losses/gains due to downtown development. 6. Parking rules and regulations will be set by the department responsible for the parking system, with approval as necessary from the City Council, and these rules/regulations will be clearly communicated to downtown user groups via printed materials and the Internet. Parking enforcement will be provided by the City of Atascadero Police Department when needed. Parking fines will be established by the City of Atascadero, and set to discourage illegal parking. Special event parking needs will be coordinated by the department responsible for the parking system when needed. The department will be reimbursed for direct and indirect costs related to special event parking when appropriate. City ofAtascadero, Califomia May 2006 9. Parking related budgets will be developed and reviewed as part of the City's budget process. Parking Organization While a parking specific department is not currently recommended, the city should designated one department as responsible.for parking related. issues. This department would coordinate parking maintenance, participate in planning for future parking needs, provide assistance with planning for special event parking, deal with parking complaints/concems, etc. This department need not directly provideall of these services; as these responsibilities could be distributed horizontally throughout the existing city department structure. Parking Communications and Marketing Communicating downtown parking policies and regulations to downtown parkers is typically done through the use of parking maps,and the city website: -,One page parking ` } maps could be created to show the locations of parking supplies, provide parking policies and regulations, provide contact information for questions and provide other information. These maps would be available at city offices, the Chamber of Commerce and at downtown businesses. The map would also be available for download from the city website. One of the issues raised during the public input process for, this parking study was the need for more downtown development communication. Downtown development communications bould be improved through additions to the existing city planning website to list pending development projects (and parking system impacts),, a broadcast e- mail listing that allows the city to send downtown development updates directly to interested individuals and/or organizations, and/or the creation of a periodic downtown development newsletter to update stakeholders of pending projects and parking related news. Parking Enforcement While Carl Walker did not observe gross abuses'of two-hour parking time limits in downtown Atascadero, the need for parking enforcement may become more important in the future. Prior to instituting a strict parking enforcement system, the city should work with downtown business owners to ensure time limited visitor -parking spaces are not taken by storeowners and employees. This can be done through education and City of Atascadero, California May 2006 communication, but also through the development of long-term parking on the perimeter of downtown. Parking Signage and Wayfinding In order to clarify parking in downtown, the city should provide adequate signage to denote public parking facilities as well as parking facility regulations. Ideally, parking signage should be part of a larger downtown wayfinding system. Directional signage should be provided to help visitors locate parking resources downtown, depending on the type of parking they need. Then, signs should be located in each parking lot that provides a name for the lot, who can park there, as well as any specific restrictions. Parking Security and Lighting One of the most common issues raised during the public input sessions was the need to improve security and lighting in parking lots and on pedestrian paths tolfrom parking areas. Public parking facilities should embody the concepts of Crime Prevention through Environmental Design. Parking facilities should be properly landscaped, lines of sight should be unobstructed, potential hiding places should be eliminated and adequate lighting should be provided. A minimum of 2.0 footcandles per square foot are recommended for downtown, high pedestrian/vehicular traffic parking lots by the Illuminating Engineering Society of America. Loading and Delivery Parking The city should consider the creation of delivery loading zones in strategic locations (e.g. near the Carlton Hotel, near the Businesses located on Entrada Avenue, etc.) The loading zones would provide time-limited parking for delivery vehicles, and provide a designated loading area. The city should identify delivery vehicle concerns and work with downtown businesses to encourage deliveries during off-peak parking periods (e.g. mornings, etc.) Incorporating Parking and Transportation The concept of integrating transportation and parking elements as part of the larger strategic vision for downtown Atascadero supports the adoption of a "Park Once — Pedestrian First" planning concept. This concept encourages downtown employees and visitors to park their vehicles in one location and then use another form of transportation to move around the downtown with excellent pedestrian, transit, parking and bicycle facilities. 0 Downtown Parking Action Plan A separate downtown parking study action plan was created based on the findings and recommendations included in the full study report. nI NJ ITEM NUMBER: RA B-2 DATE: 05/23/06 City of Atascadero Community Redevelopment Agency Staff Report - Public Works Department Creek Bank Restoration Project RECOMMENDATIONS: Agency Board: 1. Certify the attached Project Mitigated Negative Declaration; and, 2. Approve the project components and authorize the call for bids. REPORT -IN -BRIEF: Atascadero Creek Bank failed several years ago at the rear corner of the current City Hall building exposing the underside of the sidewalk, building and foundation. Staff and specialized consultants started a project to repair the Creek bank. Four alternatives were considered by the Atascadero Creek Advisory Group (ACAG) and the design team. The selected alternative is a shotcrete retaining wall system with vegetated rock slope protection. Mitigation measures are incorporated into the project to address impacts to trees, vegetations, fish, wildlife and Atascadero Creek. Photo simulation of Creek Bank Restoration ITEM NUMBER: B-2 DATE: 05123106 DISCUSSION: Background: Atascadero Creek Bank eroded several years ago at the rear of the Creekside Lanes Bowling Alley in the Century Plaza Shopping Center. Creek flow removed most of the bank at the rear corner of the building and exposed the underside of the sidewalk, building and foundation. The bank failure was anticipated when the building was designed. Caissons and grade beams were used for the foundation at the location of the bank failure. Existing conditions in May 2006. The Redevelopment Agency purchased the property and building after the bank failure and is currently leasing it to the City for use as a temporary City Hall. In 2005 the Agency started a project to repair the failed creek bank. An RFP was sent out for consultant services and Wallace Group was selected as the Project Engineer and Althouse and Meade, Inc was selected as the Environmental Consultant. ITEM NUMBER: B-2 DATE: 05/23/06 Analysis: Conceptual Design To start the design a topographic survey of the area was performed, existing trees and vegetation was inventoried, geotechnical exploration of the creek and under the building were performed and hydraulic studies were completed. This data was used to develop four alternatives methods of bank repair: Alternative 1 — Vegetated Rock Slope Protection (RSP) Alternative 2 — Shotcrete and Vegetated Rock Slope Protection Alternative 3 — Retaining Wall and Vegetated Rock Slope Protection Alternative 4 — Vegetated Crib -Wall Atascadero Creek Advisory Group (ACAG) was set up to review this and other projects along Atascadero Creek, and select alternatives. This group is made up of members of the Chamber of Commerce, Main Street, Historical Society, City Staff, Environmental Consultant, Upper Salinas -Las Tables Resource Conservation District and Atascadero Unified School District. The meetings were staffed by Public Works, Community Development and the Engineering Consultant. n Listed on the following pages is a brief description of each alternative and sample picture of the materials. n ITEM NUMBER: B-2 DATE: 05/23/06 ALTERNATIVE 1 — VEGETATED ROCK SLOPE PROTECTION (RSP) This alternative uses Rock Slope Protection (RSP) as the primary stabilization method. The 1/2 ton class RSP would be placed at a 1.5: 1 slope. Horizontally, the RSP would be placed to provide a smoothly curved bank slope, and to support the building. This alternative restores the creek bank closer to its historical location, and involves relocating the low flow channel. The relocated channel would be sized to avoid impacts to the water surface elevations, and the creek would be expected to operate in a historical manner. Due to the smooth curvature of the bank, and its match to the general creek planform, reflective hydraulic impacts are not anticipated. Bio -engineering opportunities included in the design include the following: • The RSP will be vegetated with willow cuttings, cottonwoods, and other native riparian plants • At higher elevations, where velocities are less than 5 feet per second, the RSP will be stopped, and the soil above will be sloped at 2.5:1 • A root -ball and pool will be incorporated into the low -flow channel Alternative 1 concept: Vegetated Rock Slope Protection. ITEM NUMBER: B-2 DATE: 05123/06 ALTERNATIVE 2 — SHOTCRETE AND VEGETATED ROCK SLOPE PROTECTION This alternative limits relocation of the low flow channel. At the building area, the existing vertical and concave slope would be surfaced with shotcrete. RSP and a cut-off wall would be placed below the flow line to provide toe scour protection. Up and downstream of the building, the shotcrete would flare to flatter slopes. Where the slopes flattened to 1.5:1, Rock Slope Protection (RSP) would be used as described in Alternative 1. To avoid creating new reflective hydraulic impacts from the existing vertical projection, the flare of the creek bank upstream should closely match the existing profile at elevations below the 100 -year water surface elevation. Horizontally, this requires minor encroachments into the existing low flow channel, but does not require the relocation that Alternative 1 does. Overall, the creek cross section would be larger than its historical section, and would pass larger flows. Aesthetically, the shotcrete can be placed with a colored, rough and undulating surface to better fit within the creek environment. Bio -engineering opportunities included in the design include the following: • The RSP portions will be vegetated with willow cuttings, cottonwoods, and other riparian plants • At higher elevations, where velocities are less than 5 feet per second, the RSP will be stopped, and the soil will be sloped at 2.5:1 and planted. Alternative 2 concept: Shotcrete wall above vegetated RSP. ITEM NUMBER: B-2 DATE: 05/23/06 ALTERNATIVE 3 — RETAINING WALL AND VEGETATED ROCK SLOPE PROTECTION This alternative is similar to Alternative 2, but uses a vertical retaining wall instead of shotcrete. The wall would be supported by drilled steel H -piles and would follow the edge of the sidewalk around the building. RSP and a cut-off wall would be placed below the flowline to provide toe scour protection Up and downstream of the building, the shotcrete would flare to flatter slopes. Where the slopes flattened to 1.5:1, Rock Slope Protection (RSP) would be used as described in Alternative 1. To avoid creating new reflective hydraulic impacts from the existing vertical projection, the flare of the creek bank upstream should closely match the existing profile at elevations below the 100 -year water surface elevation. Horizontally, this requires minor encroachments into the existing low flow channel, but does not require the relocation that Alternative 1 does. Overall, the creek cross section would be larger than its historical section. Aesthetically, the retaining wall can be placed with a colored and textured form to provide the appearance of natural rock. Bio -engineering opportunities included in the design include the following: • The RSP portions will be vegetated with willow cuttings, cottonwoods and other riparian plants. • At higher elevations, where velocities are less than 5 feet per second, the RSP will be stopped, and the soil will be sloped at 2.5:1, protected with bio- degradable erosion control matting, and planted. Alternative 3 concept: Retainina wall over RSP. ITEM NUMBER: B-2 DATE: 05123/06 ALTERNATIVE 4 — VEGETATED CRIB -WALL This alternative uses a concrete crib -wall and vegetation. A crib wall is constructed of interlocking members to create a volume that is filled with earth. A vegetated Crib wall uses plantings in the exposed areas along the face of the wall. The wall would be 6 to 8 feet thick, and the face would have a 1:6 batter. A cut-off wall would be placed below the flow line to provide toe scour protection Up and downstream of the building, vegetated rock slope protection and earth slopes would be used to flare out to the natural slopes. These slopes would need to be protected with erosion control fabric and vegetation. The crib wall would also need toe scour protection in the form of buried rock slope protection. To avoid creating new reflective hydraulic impacts from the existing vertical projection, the flare of the creek bank upstream should closely match the existing profile at elevations below the 100 -year water surface elevation. Horizontally, this requires minor encroachments into the existing low flow channel, but does not require the relocation that Alternative 1 does. Overall, the creek cross section would be larger than its historical section. Bio -engineering opportunities included in the design include the following: • The use of unfaced crib -walls can be vegetated with willows, blackberries or similar material. Alternative 4 concept: Vegetated Crib Wall There are two types of crib -walls, faced walls (with all openings closed), and unfaced walls (with openings that expose the interior). The unfaced type of wall allows ITEM NUMBER: B-2 DATE: 05/23/06 vegetation to be planted in the openings. The City of San Luis Obispo has experimented with this type of wall in San Luis Creek, using plastic and fiber bags to contain the interior backfill. Crib wall manufactures we have spoken to do not recommend unlaced crib -walls for the purpose of withstanding flowing water and supporting structures. However, for this application the structure is self supporting, and the upper portions of the crib -wall see relatively infrequent and low-velocity flow. Therefore it may be appropriate to use a faced wall below and an unfaced vegetated wall at the higher elevations. These alternatives were considered by ACAG on the site and at meetings. A presentation was given by Wallace Group on the 4 alternatives and the different type of materials that can be used. Listed below is a summery of the initial input from ACAG: • Liked alternative 1, vegetated rock slope protection, but wanted a retaining wall system, alternative 3 or 4, below the sidewalk so the slope would not push too far out into Atascadero Creek. • Wanted a terrace in the slope that would conform to the existing terrace in Atascadero Creek. This terrace will provide access along the lower portion of Atascadero Creek. • Create an irregular shoreline with the rock slope protection. • Retaining wall is to have a natural aesthetic appealing surface (rock, texture, etc). ^ • Plant the upper slope of the bank. • Use root wad at the base of wall to create steelhead trout habitat. ,San Vacinte Creek Vey*ated gootwa + Details o1 rootwad and """'" '""'" «�i n.o,..z - - , nn.,r.r boulder technique. Source: Chapter 16 p;','�y r. Engineering Handbook. ,p L;i�,.y'�}y,A_,y-G�,.,,o'+ NRCS 1997. Root wad concept. ITEM NUMBER: B-2 DATE: 05123/06 With this direction from ACAG the design team finalized the design. It was founj that a shotcrete retaining wall better fit the aesthetic goals of ACAG and had less site impacts caused by the footing of a conventional retaining wall. A preliminary design was completed. • Construction Documents The conceptual design was then reviewed by Swanson Hydrology + Geomorphology, for geomorphic function and riparian and aquatic habitat enhancement. The following recommendations were provided: 1. Relocate the proposed toe of RSP closer to the retaining wall beneath the building to reduce encroachment into the existing low flow channel. This may be accomplished by reducing terrace width at the building corner and/or lowering the terrace elevation. 2. If recommendation No. 1 is followed, reduce grading of in -channel bar opposite of the bank protection structure to lessen impacts to the existing riparian vegetation and habitat. 3. Modify the upstream RSP terminus to curve away from the low flow channel and key into the upper bank, leaving the existing overflow channel open to accommodate high flows. If the structure is constructed as shown, there is a risk of flows attacking r �a 'Erroseu ;. cvsa,x t ' - uK auw rm;rNmwa nw.: Fy.wrory Mv, Ormn�rea wauxarrwrscnw t°$t J 'S®cvrxa4.wlrvFwlEPw ATASCADERO CREEK BANK RESTORATION COHCEPTSKETCH: RETAINING WALL AND1.w„°� VEGETATED ROCK SLOPE PROTECTION Preliminary Design • Construction Documents The conceptual design was then reviewed by Swanson Hydrology + Geomorphology, for geomorphic function and riparian and aquatic habitat enhancement. The following recommendations were provided: 1. Relocate the proposed toe of RSP closer to the retaining wall beneath the building to reduce encroachment into the existing low flow channel. This may be accomplished by reducing terrace width at the building corner and/or lowering the terrace elevation. 2. If recommendation No. 1 is followed, reduce grading of in -channel bar opposite of the bank protection structure to lessen impacts to the existing riparian vegetation and habitat. 3. Modify the upstream RSP terminus to curve away from the low flow channel and key into the upper bank, leaving the existing overflow channel open to accommodate high flows. If the structure is constructed as shown, there is a risk of flows attacking ITEM NUMBER: B-2 DATE: 05/23/06 the structure from behind (through the overflow channel) and causing extensive additional erosion in that area. 4. Modify the downstream RSP terminus to eliminate the bulge around the existing oak tree. Incorporate irregular shoreline features in this area such as logs and rootwads to dissipate energy and enhance aquatic habitat. 5. The toe of the RSP should be set at a depth that anticipates further channel incision and potential scour during high flows. Use bioengineering treatments in the upper bank. 6. Provide a filter layer (fabric or rock) at the interface of the RSP and native soils, to prevent piping of native soils through the structure. Backfill the voids of the structure with a water jetted mix of river -run cobble, gravel, and sand, to provide a planting medium and further reduce the potential for soil piping. 7. A riparian planting plan and vegetation management plan should be formulated for the project site to include suitable riparian plantings within the bank protection structure and grading areas. These recommendations were incorporated into the design and presented to ACAG on Thursday May 18th. Staff will report on ACAG comments at the City Council Meeting. e, Construction Plan ITEM NUMBER: B-2 DATE: 05123/06 Dewatering and Construction Access The area where the vegetated rock slope protection (RSP) is placed needs to be dewatered during construction. This is needed because the toe of the RSP must be placed below the flowline of Atascadero Creek and deep enough to prevent instability from scour during high flows and potential channel incision. A 48 inch pipe will be placed in the Creek, away from the construction area to allow the summer Creek flow to bypass the construction area. The area of disturbance by this work will be restored and revegetated. To build this project construction machinery and materials must be brought down into the Creek. Access is difficult due to the heavy vegetation and steep creek banks. The Environmental and Engineering Consultants and City Staff looked for an access point that would minimize impacts to the creek, provide access throughout construction and to the neighboring Lewis Ave Bridge Project. A location was found at the north end of the rear parking lot between the Creek Bank Restoration and Lewis Ave Bridge Projects. Any damage to the parking lot will be repaired as part of the project. Soils and siltation into Atascadero Creek from this project would have a negative impact on the fish and wildlife habitat and the creek ecosystem. The Dewatering Plan detail methods and Best Management Practices (BMP) for preventing soils, silts and debris from moving downstream in Atascadero Creek, during and after construction. In Creek Flow Diversion Pipe Construction Access and Dewatering ■ . ra Construction Access ITEM NUMBER: B-2 DATE: 05/23/06 Restoration and Revegetation An important part of this job is to restore and revegetate the impacted areas. A survey has been completed of all the vegetation and trees that are impacted by this project. The Restoration and Revegetation Plan (See Below) address all the impacted and mitigation areas and the appropriate planting for the area. The goal is to revegetate the impacted areas back to their native state, without non-native species. Willows and other native riparian plants installed in the RSP will eventually cover most of the rock and shield the wall. A Tree Removal Permit, per the City of Atascadero Native Tree Ordinance, was approved through the Planning Commission. All mitigation will be incorporated into the Restoration and Revegetation Plan. A Certified Arborist will monitor all work around and on native trees to ensure the rules and intent of the permit are enforced. LC i Restoration and Revegetation Plan. 1. Gravel Bar restoration — willow, blackberry, sycamore and cottonwood 2. Channel Restoration — willow, mule fat, sedges and rushes 3. Channel Restoration — willow, mule fat, sedges and rushes 4. Large Rock Slope Protection — willows and cotton woods 5. Upper Slope Revegetation — Toyon, elderberry, red -bud, bay tree, coast live oak, walnut 6. Oak woodland restoration — coast live oak, walnut and elderberry 7. Butterfly and bird habitat creation — currents, milkweed, California lilac, sage, bee balm, mock orange and monkey flower 8. Butterfly and bird habitat creation — currents, milkweed, California lilac, sage, bee balm, mock orange and monkey flower 9. Riparian Enhancements Mitigation Area — blackberry, walnut and coast live oak ITEM NUMBER: B-2 DATE: 05123106 Fish and Wildlife The Biological Assessment for the project identified Steelhead and nesting birds as potential fish and bird impacts. Immediately prior to ground disturbance surveys will be conducted for Steelhead and nesting birds. Steelhead mitigation: The Dewatering Plan calls for the stream channel to be temporarily relocated to move water away from the construction area. To mitigate any potential impact on Steelhead habitat, the project will improve Steelhead habitat by placement of two root wads to create scour pools, and by restoration of natural sinuosity within the stream channel. Nesting bird mitigation: If the surveys do not find any nesting birds, construction activity may be conducted. If nesting raptors are located, no construction activities shall occur within 200 feet of the nests until the chicks are fledged. If nesting songbirds are located, the biological monitor will consult with the Department of Fish and Game warden and/or biologist to determine appropriate setbacks on a case-by-case basis. Wall aesthetics One of the advantages of shotcrete is the ability to color and texture the material to blend into the surrounding area. Shown below are examples shotcrete walls. Staff will work with the selected contractor to obtain a color and texture of the wall that will not stand out and will complement the surrounding area. Following are examples of shotocrete walls. F I - , i t4 Y� r maw, Example Shotocrete Walls 2 )� A ITEM NUMBER: B-2 DATE: 05/23/06 Examples Shotocrete Walls - d J Examples Shotocrete Walls r^i Conclusion: W n ITEM NUMBER: B-2 DATE: 05/23/06 This project will rehabilitate the creek bank failure and mitigate impacts of the project. If the Board authorizes call for bids, the schedule for the project is as follows: • Call for Bids May 24th • Award Project June 27th • Start construction July 17th • End Construction October 13th FISCAL IMPACT: AVAILABLE REVENUES Redevelopment Bond Funds 1 $ 450,000 Total Available Revenues $ 450,000 PROJECTED EXPENDITURES Design $ 46,300 Environmental study, geomorphologyand re -vegetation $ 39,000 Surveying and soils $ 7,500 Construction $ 477,300 Construction administration and inspection $ 95,500 Contingency $ 95,500 Environmental Monitoring $ 23,900 Total Projected Expenditures $ 785,000 TOTAL PROJECTED SHORTFALL Potential funding sources for this funding shortfall are: Redevelopment Agency Funds. These are general Redevelopment Agency increment and other revenues. The Agency could appropriate funds from reserves. Redevelopment Bond Project Funds. These are funds are from the bond sale the Agency completed. These funds are currently allocated to specific projects. If this funding source is used, it is anticipated that funds set aside for the City Hall Restoration Project would be reduced. ITEM NUMBER: B-2 DATE: 05/23/06 Staff will come back to the Agency Board on June 27th for the award of this project and allocation of funding when the total construction costs are known. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A - Mitigated Negative Declaration Attachment B — Creek Bank restoration Plans U 1 ATTACHMENT A RECEIVED CITY OF ATASCADERO AULIE L.PR 2 2f10S JRUuEWALD Couny Clerk COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Dep - CITY OF ATASCADERO NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Atascadero Planning Commission will be holding a public hearing to consider the following project and environmental determination. The public is encouraged to attend. Applicant: City of Atascadero, 6907 El Camino Real , Atascadero, CA 93422 rnone: suD- ui-juvv Project Title: Precise Plan 2004-0160, Atascadero Creek Restoration Project Atascadero Creek, -East of El Camino Real behind the Atascadero City Hall building Location, San Luis Obispo County, California. APN 029-361-003 Project The proposed project consists of repair and restoration of a portion of the Atascadero Creek. The project Description- includes: relocating a portion of a gravel bar; keying in large rocks; replanting the creek bank with native willows. For approximately one month of the project, a portion of Atascadero Creek will be diverted, either by culvert pipe or plastic over a rock berm. Several non-native species are proposed for removal, as well as several walnut trees. Willow, walnut, oak, and native blackberry trees shall be planted. All tree removals shall be consistent with City's native tree ordinance. The project also includes weed abatement maintenance, willow pruning, and native plant installation within the creek area between El Camino Real and the bridge crossing. General Plan Designation: Open Space (OS) Zoning District: Open Space (OS) Environmental FBegins-Apri124, 2006Review Dates: nds: May 23, 2006 HearingI Atascadero City Hall Council Chambers Location: 6907 El Camino Real, Atascadero, CA 93422 Proposed Based on the initial study prepared for the project, a Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental is proposed. The proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration is available for public Determination: review from 4/24/06 through 5/23/06 at 6907 El Camino Real, Community Development Department, from 8:06 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Any interested person may review the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration and project files. Questions should be dirgcted to Steve ycHarris, Deputy Community Development Director at 461-5000. St en G. Mc arris, Deputy Coranunity Development Director mater t 1 . e�mmc oarsuoaro nu - 6907 EL CAMINO REAL- ATASCADERO, CA 93422 • = (805) 461-5000 • FAX 461-7612 CITY OF ATASCADERO PROPOSED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION #2006-0013 6907 El Camino Real, Atascadero; CA 93422 805/461-5000 Applicant: City of Atascadero, 6907 El Camino Real, Atascadero, CA 93422 Phone: 805-461-5000 Project Title: Precise Plan 2004-0160, Atascadero Creek Restoration Project Atascadero Creek, East of El Camino Real behind the Atascadero City Hall building Location: San Luis Obispo County, California. APN 029-361-003 Project The proposed project consists of repair and restoration of a portion of the Atascadero Creek. The project Description: includes: relocating a portion of a gravel bar; keying in large rocks; replanting the creek bank with native willows. For approximately one month of the project, a portion of Atascadero Creek will be diverted, either by culvert pipe or plastic over a rock berm. Several non-native species are proposed for removal, as well as several walnut trees. Willow, walnut, oak, and native blackberry trees shall be planted. All tree removals shall be consistent with City's native tree ordinance. The project also includes weed abatement maintenance, willow pruning, and native plant installation within the creek area between EI Camino Real and the bridge crossing. General Plan Designation: Open Space (OS) Zoning District: Open Space (OS) Findings:. 1. The project does not have the potential to degrade the environment. 2. The project will not achieve short-term to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals. 3. The project does not have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable. 4. The project will not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings either directly or indirectly. Determination: Based on the above findings, and the information contained in the initial study 2006-0013 (made a part hereof by reference and on file in the Community Development Department), it has been determined that the above project will not have an adverse impact on the environment when the following proposed mitigation measures are incorporated into the project (see attachment). .Prepared By: Steve McHarris, Deputy Community Development Director Date Posted: April 21, 2006 Public Review Ends: May 20, 2006 Attachments: - Location Map - Aerial - Site Plan . - Creek Restoration Exhibit - Initial Study 2006-0013 Fdc C6y Na11Crtd Rmantim AAD.OLL¢ -- - RinlDnr.01/11N69AJ AM 6907 EL CAMINO READ ATASCADERO, CA 93422 • (805) 461-5000 i FAX 461-7612 CITY OFATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM PnvimnmentAl Review 2006-0013 Applicant: City of Atascadero, 6907 El Camino Real , Atascadero, CA 93422 Phone: 805-461-5000 - Project Title: Precise Plan 2004-0160, Atascadero Creek Restoration Project Atascadero Creek, East of EI Camino Real behind the Atascadero City Hall building Location: San Luis Obispo County, California. APN 029-361-003 Project The proposed project consists of repair and restoration of a portion of the Atascadero Creek. The project Description: includes: relocating a portion of a gravel bar; keying in large rocks; replanting the creek bank with native General Plan willows. For approximately one month of the project, a portion of Atascadero Creek will be diverted, Designation:. either by culvert pipe or plastic over a rock berm. Several non-native species are proposed for removal; as Zoning: well as several walnut trees. Willow, walnut, oak,,and native blackberry trees shall be planted. All tree Surrounding Land removals shall be consistent with City's native tree ordinance. The project also includes weed abatement Uses and Setting: maintenance, willow pruning, and native plant installation within the creek area between El Camino Real and the bridge crossing. General Plan Designation: Open Space (OS) Zoning District: Open Space (OS) - M Lead Agency Name City of Atascadero .. . and Address: 6907 El Camino Real, Atascadero, CA 93422 Contact Person and : .Steve McHarris, Deputy Community Development Director Phone Number. City of Atascadero. 6907 E1 Camino Real, Atascadero, CA 93422 General Plan Open Space (OS) Designation:. - Zoning: Open Space (OS) Surrounding Land North: Downtown (D). Uses and Setting: South: Downtown (D)' West: Downtown (D) East: Open Space (OS), Downtown (D) Other public None agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or parficipation agreement) City Hail Creek Restoration MNn.pt.dm - Attachment 1 Drilling and Location Map Atascadero Creek Atascadero, CA CITY OF ATASCADERO IIVrFL4L STUDY Existing Zoning: Open Space (OS) Existing General Plan Designation: Open Space (OS) n 0421MB City Nan Geek ReftmUw MND4)tdw ml F l1.e4 WI + t Awe f.F, x5 w �FA ' jAy! R zv_ y is .2 AVV Y d i ni, V� * Io 3 MOM$ Attachment 4 Restoration Exhibit CITY OF ATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY 0421106 City Hall Creek Restoration MNO.pctloc E rreit � i A 1� YC, •, E` �. d fa Ali bA x[ F �1�ggPv .s• i � 9C90 ?.� iF t � 9 CITY OF ATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY Exhibit A Mitigation Monitoring Program PPN 20040160 . Atascadero Creek Bank Restoration Project - - - Timing GP. Gradng Peart BP. Bugging Ponril T6.Terrpomry - Cmu rer RFial nspaden F0-.Fral0=earq Responsibility /Monitoring PS: Flamrg*Sormm E$:Buldng5er*w FD: Fee Dexulrent PD: Poke Depararenl CE Cdy Enpeer WRWMtswaler Ck MyAtlomey AMC'.WatarCmry. Mitigation Measure - Mitigation Measure 3.b.1: The project shall be conditioned to comply BP, GP Bs, Ps, CE 3.b.1 with all applicable District regulations pertaining to the control of fugitive dust (PM -10) as contained in sections 6.3, 6.4 and 6.5 of the April 2003 Air Quality Handbook. Section 6.3: Construction Equipment Maintain all construction equipment in proper tune according to manufacturer's specifications. Fuel all off-road and portable diesel powered equipment, including but not limited to bulldozers, graders, cranes, loaders, scrapers, backhoes, generator sets, compressors, auxiliary power units, with ARB certified motor vehicle diesel fuel (Non -taxed version suitable for use off-road). • Maximize to the extent feasible, the use of diesel construction equipment meeting the ARB's 1996 or newer certification standard for off-road heavy-duty diesel engines. Install diesel oxidation catalysts (DOC), catalyzed diesels particulate filters (CDPF) or other District approved emission reduction retrofit services (Required for projects grading more.than 4.0 acres of continuously worked area).. Section 6.4: Activity Management Techniques Develop a comprehensive construction activity management plan designed to minimize the amount of large construction equipment operating during any given time period. , • Schedule of construction truck trips during non -peak hours to reduce peak hour emissions. • Limit the length of the construction workday period, if necessary. • Phase construction activities, -if -appropriate. -Section 6.5: Fugitive PM10 All of the following measures shall be included on grading, demolition and building plan notes: A. Reduce the amount of the disturbed area where possible. B. Use of water trucks or sprinkler systems in sufficient quantities to prevent airborne dustfrom leaving the site. Increased watering frequency would be required whenever wind speeds - exceed 15 mph. Reclaimed (non -potable) water should be used whenever possible. C. All dirt stockpile areas should be sprayed daily as needed. D. Permanent dust control measures identified in the approved project re -vegetation and landscape plans should be implemented as soon as possible following completion of any — - .soil disturbing activities. E. Exposed ground areas that are planned to be reworked at dates greater than one month after initial grading "should be sown with a fast -germinating native grass seed `and watered until vegetation is established.- stablished. F. F. All disturbed soil areas not subject to re -vegetation should be stabilized usingapproved chemical soil binder; jute nettin , or . 0421/06 City Hall Creek Restorallon MND.ptdm - r-) n CITY OFATASCADERO INTFLAL STUDY Exhibit A Timing Responsibility Mitigation (Monitoring Measure Mitigation Monitoring Program PPN 20040160 GP. Gratling Pemd BReuOtlmg Pemil PS: Plarsmgservkaz as:euxmgsentu ' - .. .. Torenpowy Oc arq FD: Re Depart t FD: Police DepaNnent Atascadero Creek Bank Restoration Project �rPoWlD�^d CE City Enpraar WW:.Wanamler CA: Uy Mone/ ANWC:WalerCmn. other methods approved in advance by the APCD. G. All roadways, driveways, sidewalks, etc, to be paved should be complete as soon as possible. In addition, building pads should be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used. H. Vehicle speed for all construction vehicles shall not exceed 15 mph on any unpaved surface at the construction site. 1. All trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials are to be covered or should maintain at least two feet of freeboard (minimum vertical distance between top of load and top of trailer) in accordance with CVC Section 23114. J. Install wheel washers where vehicles enter and exit unpaved roads onto streets, or was off trucks and equipment leaving the site. K. Sweep streets at the end of each day if visible soil material is carried onto adjacent paved roads. Water sweepers With reclaimed water should be used where feasible. The contractor or builder shall designate a.person or persons to monitor the dust control program and to order increased watering, as necessary, to prevent transport of dust off site. The name and telephone number.of such persons shall be provided to the APCD prior to land use clearance for map recordation and land use clearance for finish grading of any structure. Mitigation Measure 4.a.b.d.1 Immediately prior to ground disturbance BP Ps, BS 4.a.b.d.1 activities, or any activity that affects riparian habitat, a preconstruction survey shall be conducted to determine the potential for steelhead to occur in work areas. If no water is present in the work areas, the project may commence without further surveys or monitoring obligations for steelhead. If water is present, the preconstruction survey shall be conducted in a manner that will identify if steelhead are present in the work areas. Mitigation Measure 4.a.b.d.2 If steelhead are present in the work areas, BP Ps 4.a.b.d2 the fish will be moved to an appropriate location prior to project commencement. Mike Hill, Fisheries Biologist with the California Department of Fish and Game, will electro -fish the work areas and relocate the fish. Mitigation Measure 4.a.b.d.3 The project will include riparian habitat BP PS 4.a.b.d.3 enhancement specifically designed to increase the quality of steelhead habitat. Riparian habitat mitigation will increase the aerial extent of riparian habitat onsite at a 2:1 ratio (created to impacted riparian area) ., Enhancements shall include recreating natural sinuosity within the stream shcnnel, and root wad placement to increase the quality of pool habitat. -- Mitigation Measure 4.a.b.dA Riparian habitat shall be. protected from BP PS 4.a.b.dA direct and indirect impacts where practicable. Riparian habitat rotections include avoiding direct impacts to drainages such as culverts - - 0421M - - City Hall Creek Ftestordgon MND.PLtlx .... CITY OFATASCADERO IATITLAL STUDY Exhibit A Timing Responsibility Mitigation Mitigation Monitoring Program (Monitoring Measure PPN 20040760 GP: G2dng Pend PS: naramg serviese BP. Balding Pend BS: BuMmg Serim TaJernarary FD: Fee DepaNrenl Atascadero Creek Bank Restoration Project R panty FC Final rtwpar P0.'Po[cepra, m CWC .. Fo: rnalacuparcy asiewaer WVJ:PJadevreler Cn Cn/PnoerC PMWC: Water Corte. and crossings. Minimize indirect impacts by providing bio -filtration of storm water and designing detention for residential and roadway discharges. Mitigation Measure 4.a.b.d.5 Immediately prior to ground disturbance BP PS 4.a.b.d.5 activities, if work occurs between March 1 and August 31 nesting bird surveys shall be conducted. To avoid impacts to nesting birds, grading and construction activities that affect riparian habitat or trees shall not be conducted during the breeding season from March 1 to August 31. If construction activities must be conducted during this period, nesting bird surveys shall take place within one week of ground disturbance. If surveys do not locate nesting birds, construction activities may be conducted. If nesting birds are located, no construction activities shall occur within 200 feet of nests until chicks are fledged. Construction activities shall observe a 300 foot buffer for raptor nests. Mitigation Measure 4.a.b.d.6 Impacts to the riparian zone shall be BP PS 4.a.b.d.6 minimized to protect local wildlife movement corridors. Open space fences shall not include game wire, no -climb wire, or impenetrable fencing, or shall have animal passages at 450 foot intervals. Exterior lights shall be low watt and shielded to direct lighting to the ground. Mitigation Measure 4.c.1 Where impacts to the riparian areas are BP PS 4.c.1 proposed, the following steps must be completed depending upon jurisdictional areas affected: 1. Permits must be obtained, as appropriate, from the California Department of Fish and Game (DFG Code 1600), the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Section 404 of the Clean Water Act), the Regional Water Quality Control Board (Section 401 of the Clean Water Act) 2. A mitigation, monitoring, and reporting plan will be prepared and approved by the County and other jurisdictional agencies, as appropriate (i.e., California Department of Fish and Game, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and the Regional Water Quality Control Board). Riparian mitigation. will increase the. aerial extent of riparian habitat on site at a two -to -one ratio (created riparian area to impacted riparian area). Functions and values of the created riparian zone must be equivalent to or better than the existing habitat. 3. Riparian habitat mitigation will provide enhancements for listed species known to be present in the area. Enhancements shall include re-creating natural sinuosity within the stream channel, and root wad placement to increase the quality of pool habitat. --- 4. Riparian mitigation will include weed abatement, native tree mitigation planting and native shrub planting;;between EI Camino Real and Lewis 'Avenue Bridge. Weed 'abatement 0421106 '' - "' - _ City Halt Creek Restaagon MND.pLdoc N n. CITY OFATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY Exhibit A - Timing Responsibility Mitigation /Monitoring Measure Mitigation Monitoring Program IS PPN 20040160 GPGmVngPeM Ger&tMm TB&s:&FI LaKvnagS TaJenimmy omparcy FD: Fire Deparh*M PD:PorceDepatmN Atascadero Creek Bank Restoration Project Fl: Rdhspe6m F0,FffW0=pM CE Co Enpnw VW.Wavemtu GA:Qyft.,y AMWQWaWCarry. shall especially focus on removal of non-native blackberry and honeysuckle. Mitigation trees shall include 16 coast live oaks and up to 68 California walnuts (5 -gallon size). Native blackberries, elderberries, and willows shall be planted as the dominant understory cover. Mitigation 4.e.1. Protect and monitor all trees to be impacted and fully BP PS protected within 20 feet of disturbance. Provide protection during construction for all trees not proposed for removal. a. All native trees and specimen trees within 20 feet of proposed disturbance will be tagged with permanent numbered tags (round aluminum tags, 1.25 inches in diameter) b. Tree protection fencing (orange construction fencing) will be installed at the outer limit of the drip line with t -posts placed no further apart than six (6) to eight (8) feet. Construction fending Will be firmly affixed with wire or zip ties. Trees that may be impacted shall be protected with construction fencing, depending on the impacts expected within the dripline. c. An environmental monitor shall conduct a Worker education meeting for the contractors and operators prior to -ground -breaking activities; The briefing shall include a walk4firough to identify each of the trees in the work area: the trees to be protected, and the trees that may be impacted or removed. d. The monitor shall check daily during active construction to determine If the listed trees are being protected. Mitigation Measure 4.e.2 All impacts and disturbance within the root BP PS 4.e2 zone shall be documented and reported to the project manager and to the arborist who must treat damaged branches and roots. BP PS 4.e.3 Mitigation Measure 4.e.3. Replace trees that are removed. To offset the loss of native tree canopy and total tree numbers, trees will be planted to -replace canopy lost. The City of Atascadero tree ordinance. requires .mitigation for native trees removed. The sizes protected are.over two inches (2") dbh for native deciduous trees and fourinches (4") dbh for all other protected native trees. Replacement trees shall be &gallon size, locally grown, native stock of the same species as, the removed tree. One City mitigation option for commercial project tree removals is for every deciduous native tree, plant four 5 -gallon trees for every 6 inches dbh of tree removed; for other native.trees on their list, plant two 5 - gallon trees for every 6 inches dbh of tree removed. A second mitigation option is to- plant larger size specimens to ieduce the quantity of replacements using a ratio based on box size. (For example, a"24 inch box tree equals two 5 -gallon locally grown trees.) - - ------- - 7 CITY OFATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY Exhibit A Timing Responsibility Mitigation Mitigation Monitoring Program (Monitoring Measure PPN 20040160 OP6adkg Perm1 BP.6Mkg Pemdt Ps: Pannkg 6eraes B6:fiuddkg6erVm TO:Terr enry FD: Fire Dep ernent - - - 0oaoxy PD: POGce Depxnnenl Atascadero Creek Bank Restoration Project m: Fealkspec»n CE city Enpkeer Fa.F.Cmupzmy. WW:Wastavater CACiy Alemey AWD. Water Conp. SP PS 4.eA Mitigation Measure 4.e.4. Pruning and wound care shall be done under the supervision of a certified arborist. All cuts to branches or roots over 1.5 inches in diameter will be treated, as appropriate, to reduce fungal, bacterial, and insect infections. A certified arborist or tree care specialist shall be contracted to care for damaged roots and branches during construction in the vicinity of oaks. BP PS 4.e.5 Mitigation Measure 4.e.5 Prepare and implement a native tree planting plan. The mitigation plan will include tree planting, protection, maintenance, and monitoring for five (5) years. Success criteria will include tree height and total numbers of live trees at the end of five years. The final landscape bond amount will not be returned until the success criteria have been met. BP PS 4.e.6 Mitigation Measure 4.e.6 At building permit review, all tree protection requirements shall be shown on grading plans. All trees to be protected will be clearly shown on grading and drainage plans. The tree protection recommendations shall be consistent with Appendix C of the Biological Assessment will be shown on the plans. Mitigation Measure 4.e.7 Prepare restoration plan for Atascadero Creek BP- Ps 4.e.7 between site of future pedestrian bridge and Lewis Avenue. BP PS 4.e.8 Mitigation Measure 4.e.8: Grading, excavation, and all mitigation measures shall be consistent with the City of Atascadero Tree Ordinance. Special precautions when working around native trees include: 1. All existing trees outside of the limits of work shall remain. 2. Earthwork shall not exceed the limits of the project area. 3. Low branches in danger of being tom from trees shall be pruned prior to any heavy equipment work being done. 4. Vehicles and stockpiled material shall be stored outside the dripline of all trees. 5. All trees within the area of work shall be fenced for protection with 4 -foot chain link, snow or safety fencing placed per the approved tree protection plan. Treeprotection fencing shall be in place prior to any site excavation or grading. Fencing shall remain in place until completion of all construction activities. 6. Any roots that are encountered during excavation shall be clean cut by hand and sealed with an approved tree seal. . Mitigation Measure 6.b.1: The building permit application plans shall GP/BP P5, BS, CE 6.b.1 include erosion control measures to prevent soil, dirt, and debris from entering the storm drain system during and after construction. A separate plan shall be submitted for this purpose and shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer at the time of Building Permit application. -.0427/06 City Hall Creek Restoration MND.pLdoc n n CITY OFATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY Exhibit A Timing Responsibility. Mitigation !Monitoring Measure Mitigation Monitoring Program GP.GrdtlmA Pemd PS: Fmnn'inA Services PPN 20040160 ePBuidmAPemd ss:BUMgSe*M TO:Tepomry FD: Fre Depa=N Ottuperrty PD:Pofiw Dexo nI Atascadero Creek Bank Restoration Project e. FmInpecton FO: Final Omup r y CECrty@,ghee` WW.WWtMIW CRCey Marney . - PMWQWaIerCatp. Mitigation Measure 5.b.1: Should any cultural resources be unearthed BP PS 5.b.1 during site development work, the provisions of CEQA -Section 15064.5, will be followed to reduce impacts to a non-significant level. Mitigation Measure 8.e.f.1: The City is responsible for ensuring that all GPBP_ PS, BS, CE 8.e11 contractors are aware of all storm water quality measures and that such measures are implemented. Failure to comply with the approved construction Best Management Practices will result in the issuance of correction notices, citations, or stop orders. Mitigation Measure 11.d.1: All construction activities shall comply with BP, GP PS, BS, CE 11.d.1 the City of Atascadero Noise Ordinance for hours of operation. CYIY OFATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ❑ Aesthetics ❑ Biological Resources ElHazards & Hazardous Materials ❑ Mineral Resources ❑ Public Services ❑ Utilities / Service Systems On the basis of this initial evaluation: ❑ Agriculture Resources ❑ Cultural Resources 7 Hydrology / Water Quality ❑ Air Quality ❑ Geology /Soils ❑ Land Use / Planning 0 Noise ❑ Population / Housing ❑ Recreation ❑ Transportation/Traffic ❑ Mandatory Findings of Significance ❑ I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will.be prepared. ® I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant effect" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. ❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier ETR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. 44AVIl�1,�,,�� --Ste�de$G. WHarris Deputy Community Development Director 0427106 _ - City Hall Creek Restoration MND.pLdoc n :l 1 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: CITY-OFATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a Lead Agency cites following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately . supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply doesnot apply to projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rapture zone). A "No Impact' answer should beexplained — - where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards (e.g. the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) "Potentially Significant Impact' is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. If there are one or more 'Potentially Significant Impact' entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) 'Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact' to a "Less than Significant Impact." The Lead Agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses," may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIIt, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). Earlier analyses are discussed in Section XVII at the end of the checklist. 6) Lead Agencies are encouraged to incorporate.into the checklist references information sources for potential impacts (e.g. general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where. appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. A source list should be attached. Other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 1 1 04121106 — - - --- - - - City Hall Creek Restoration MND.pLdoc - Initial Study 2006-0013 PPN 2006-XXXX Atascadero Creek Bank Restoration Project 1.1. AESTHETICS —Would the project:. - CITY OF ATASCADERO MTL4,L STUDY Potentially Less Than significant- Slgnificantwith Impact Mitigation Incorporation Less Than No Significant Impact Impact a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? ❑ ❑ ❑ b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings ❑ ❑ ® ❑ within a state scenic highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare that would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ SOURCES: Project Description DISCUSSION: 1.a,b,c,d) The'project site is not located within a scenic vista. The creek bank will be restored and a pedestrian walkway will be added along the back of City Hall. The project will not damage scenic resources, or degrade existing visual character and it will not result in light or glare. 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES: In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the ' California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, ❑ ❑ ❑1171 due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? SOURCES: Land Use Element EIR; project description DISCUSSION 2.a.) The property is not shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency as prime farmland.' - 2.b.) The property is not under a Williamson Act contract, 2.c.) The project will not result in the conversion of farmland to non-agricultural uses. 3. AIR QUALITY — The significance criteria established by the Air Quality Control District in its CEQA Guidelines may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: - 0421106 " Page 13 City Hall Creek Restoration MND.pt.doc r-) 1 Initial Study 2006-0013 PPN 2006-XXXX Atascadero Creek Bank Restoration Project CITY OF ATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant with Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable ❑ air qualityplan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially ❑ to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any ❑ criteria pollutant for which the project region Is non - attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant ❑ concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number ❑ of people? ❑' ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ SOURCES: Air Pollution Control District (APCD) CEQA Air Quality Handbook, Project Description DISCUSSION: 3.a.b.c.) This project will not affect or produce any significant air pollutants after completion of construction. Construction activities, including site grading may produce small quantities of air pollution, including dust and equipment exhaust. Any air, quality impacts will be temporary and short term. 3.d.e.) The restoration of the creek bank and the associated on-site and public improvements will not concentrate pollutants nor will it create objectionable odors. Mitigation Measure 3.b.1: The project shall be conditioned to comply with all applicable District regulations pertaining to the control of fugitive dust (PM -10) as contained in sections 6.3, 6.4 and 6.5 of the April 2003 Air Quality Handbook. Section 6.3: Construction Equipment • Maintain all construction equipment in proper tune according to manufacturer's specifications. • Fuel all off-road and portable diesel powered equipment, including but not limited to bulldozers, graders, cranes, loaders, scrapers, backhoes, generator sets, compressors, auxiliary power units, with ARB certified motor vehicle diesel fuel (Non -taxed version suitable for use off-road). • Maximize to the extent feasible, the use of diesel construction equipment meeting the ARS's 1996 or newer certification standard for off-road heavy-duty diesel engines. • Install diesel oxidation catalysts (DOC), catalyzed diesels particulate filters (CDPF) or other District approved emission reduction retrofit services (Required for projects grading more than 4.0 acres of continuously worked area). Section 64: Activity Management Techniques • Develop a comprehensive construction activity management plan designed to minimize the amount of large construction equipment operating during any given time period. • Schedule of construction truck trips during non -peak hours to reduce peak hour emissions. • Limit the length of the construction workday period, if necessary. • Phase construction activities, if appropriate. Section 6.5: Fugitive PM10 -- All of the following measures shall be included on grading, demolition and building plan notes: A. -Reduce the amount of the disturbed area where possible. B.- Use of water trucks or sprinkler systems insufficient quantities to prevent airborne dust from leaving the site. Increased watering frequency would be, required wheneverwind speeds exceed 15 mph. Reclaimed (non - potable) water should be used whenever possible. C. All dirt stockpile areas should be sprayed daily as needed. City Hall Creek Restoration MND.pLdm -.. 04M/DS _ — - Page 14. CITY OFATASCADERO mem INTTIAL STUDY Initial Study 2006-0013 .. Potentially Less Than Cess Than No 1 ) Significant Signincantwith Significant Impact PPN 2006-XXXX Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporstion Atascadero Creek Bank Restoration Project D. Permanent dust control measures identified in the approved project re-vegetationand landscape plans should be implemented as soon as possible following completion of any soil disturbing activities. E. Exposed ground areas that are plann4ed to be reworked at dates greater than one month after initial grading should be sown with a fast -germinating native grass seed'and watered until vegetation is established. F. All disturbed soil areas not subject to re -vegetation should be stabilized using approved chemical soil binder, jute netting, or other methods approved in advance by the APCD. G. All roadways, driveways, sidewalks, etc, to be paved should be complete as soon as possible. In addition, building pads should be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used. H. Vehicle speed for all construction vehicles shall not exceed 15 mph on any unpaved surface at the construction site. I. All trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials are to be covered or should maintain at least two feet of freeboard (minimum vertical distance between top of load and top of trailer) in accordance with CVC Section 23114. J. Install wheel washers where vehicles enter and exit unpaved roads onto streets, or was off trucks and equipment leaving the site. K. Sweep streets at the end of each day if visible soil material is carried onto adjacent paved roads. Water sweepers with reclaimed water should be used where feasible. L. The contractor or builder shall designate a person or persons to monitor the dust control program and to order increased watering, as necessary, to prevent transport of dust off site. The name and telephone number of such persons shall be provided to the APCD prior to land use clearance for map recordation and. 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES —Would the project a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or - through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive; or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat „ 1 ® ❑ ❑ or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act': (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.).through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? - d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native 0 El resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or Impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? 'e) Conflict with ariy local policies or ordinances protecting El El biological resources, such as a. tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with provisions of an adopted Habitat El ❑a Corse rvation-Plan, Natural Commun'ily Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? W21106 _. - - Page 15':_ .-- - `. City Han D2ek Restoration MND.ptdcc_ SOURCES: Project Description, Land Use Element EIR, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Letter, Native I ree Inventory Report & Biological Assessment, Althouse and Meade DISCUSSION: 4. a.b.d) The creek is home to some rare species observed during the survey by Althouse and Meade. Among them are the Cooper's Hawk, Sharp -shinned Hawk, Pallid Bat, Yellow Warbler, White-tailed Kite, Yellow -breasted Chat, and California Red -legged Frog. The only two special status animals identified during the site survey were the Southwestern Pond Turtle and the Steelhead Trout. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has reviewed the project for its impacts to endangered species and their designated critical habitat. Steelhead habitat is present in the area and steelhead have been found in reach of stream that runs through the project area. The project may affect but is not likely to adversely impact the habitat of the steelhead. Any minor disturbance to the 'riparian habitat or animals around it will be temporary and short term. To reduce potential impact to the steelhead, turtles, and other listed animal habitats, mitigation shall be in place before, during and after construction (see below). 4. c. The creek bank restoration project will not have an adverse affect on federal and state water bodies because Mitigation Measure 4.c.1 shall be in place. 4e.f.) Many native trees are proposed for removal. All work done around native trees shall be subject to the mitigation recommended by the project arborist report below. Mitigation Measure 4.a.b.d.1 Immediately prior to ground disturbance activities, or any activity that affects riparian habitat, a preconstruction survey shall be conducted to determine the potential for steelhead to occur in work areas. If no water is present in the work areas, the project may commence without further surveys or monitoring obligations for steelhead. If water is present, the preconstruction survey shall be conducted in a manner that will identify if ^ steelhead are. present in the work areas. Mitigation Measure 4.a.b.d.2 If steelhead are present in the work areas, the fish will be moved to an appropriate location. prior to project commencement. Mike Hill, Fisheries Biologist with the California Department of Fish and Game, will electro -fish the work areas and relocate the fish. Mitigation Measure 4.a.b.d.3 The project will include r parian habitat enhancement specifically designed to increase the quality of steelhead habitat. Riparian habitat mitigation will increase the aerial extent of riparian habitat onsite at a 2:1 ratio (created to impacted riparian area) . Enhancements shall include recreating natural sinuosity within the stream shcnnel, and root wad placement to increase the quality of pool habitat. Mitigation Measure 4.a.b.d.4 Riparian habitat shall be protected from direct and indirect impacts where practicable. Riparian habitat protections include avoiding direct impacts to drainages such as culverts and crossings. Minimize indirect impacts by providing bio -filtration of storm water and designing detention for residential and roadway discharges. Mitigation Measure 4.a.b.d.5 Immediately prior to ground disturbance activities, if work occurs between March 1 and August. 31 nesting bird surveys shall be conducted. To avoid impacts to nesting birds, grading and construction activities that affect riparian habitat or trees shall not be conducted, during the breeding season from March 1 to. August 31. If construction activities must be conducted during this period, nesting bird surveys shall take place within one week of ground disturbance. If surveys do not locate nesting birds, construction activities may be conducted..lf nesting birds are located, no construction activities shall occur within 200 feet of nests until chicks are fledged. Construction activities shall observe a 300 foot buffer for raptor nests. Mitigation Measure 4.a.b.d.6 Impacts to the riparian zone shall be minimized to protect local wildlife movement corridors. Open space fences shall not include game wire, no -climb wire, or impenetrable fencing, or shall have animal passages at 150 foot intervals. Exterior lights shall be low watt and shielded to direct lightingdo the ground. Page 16 . . City Hall Creek Restoration MND.pt.dcc . C17Y OFATASCADERO INITIAL STLIDY Initial Stud 2008-0015 Study Potentially Less Than Less Than No significant Signiflcantwith significant Impact PPN 2006-XXXX Impact Mitigation Impact Incorparatlon Atascadero Creek Bank Restoration Project SOURCES: Project Description, Land Use Element EIR, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Letter, Native I ree Inventory Report & Biological Assessment, Althouse and Meade DISCUSSION: 4. a.b.d) The creek is home to some rare species observed during the survey by Althouse and Meade. Among them are the Cooper's Hawk, Sharp -shinned Hawk, Pallid Bat, Yellow Warbler, White-tailed Kite, Yellow -breasted Chat, and California Red -legged Frog. The only two special status animals identified during the site survey were the Southwestern Pond Turtle and the Steelhead Trout. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has reviewed the project for its impacts to endangered species and their designated critical habitat. Steelhead habitat is present in the area and steelhead have been found in reach of stream that runs through the project area. The project may affect but is not likely to adversely impact the habitat of the steelhead. Any minor disturbance to the 'riparian habitat or animals around it will be temporary and short term. To reduce potential impact to the steelhead, turtles, and other listed animal habitats, mitigation shall be in place before, during and after construction (see below). 4. c. The creek bank restoration project will not have an adverse affect on federal and state water bodies because Mitigation Measure 4.c.1 shall be in place. 4e.f.) Many native trees are proposed for removal. All work done around native trees shall be subject to the mitigation recommended by the project arborist report below. Mitigation Measure 4.a.b.d.1 Immediately prior to ground disturbance activities, or any activity that affects riparian habitat, a preconstruction survey shall be conducted to determine the potential for steelhead to occur in work areas. If no water is present in the work areas, the project may commence without further surveys or monitoring obligations for steelhead. If water is present, the preconstruction survey shall be conducted in a manner that will identify if ^ steelhead are. present in the work areas. Mitigation Measure 4.a.b.d.2 If steelhead are present in the work areas, the fish will be moved to an appropriate location. prior to project commencement. Mike Hill, Fisheries Biologist with the California Department of Fish and Game, will electro -fish the work areas and relocate the fish. Mitigation Measure 4.a.b.d.3 The project will include r parian habitat enhancement specifically designed to increase the quality of steelhead habitat. Riparian habitat mitigation will increase the aerial extent of riparian habitat onsite at a 2:1 ratio (created to impacted riparian area) . Enhancements shall include recreating natural sinuosity within the stream shcnnel, and root wad placement to increase the quality of pool habitat. Mitigation Measure 4.a.b.d.4 Riparian habitat shall be protected from direct and indirect impacts where practicable. Riparian habitat protections include avoiding direct impacts to drainages such as culverts and crossings. Minimize indirect impacts by providing bio -filtration of storm water and designing detention for residential and roadway discharges. Mitigation Measure 4.a.b.d.5 Immediately prior to ground disturbance activities, if work occurs between March 1 and August. 31 nesting bird surveys shall be conducted. To avoid impacts to nesting birds, grading and construction activities that affect riparian habitat or trees shall not be conducted, during the breeding season from March 1 to. August 31. If construction activities must be conducted during this period, nesting bird surveys shall take place within one week of ground disturbance. If surveys do not locate nesting birds, construction activities may be conducted..lf nesting birds are located, no construction activities shall occur within 200 feet of nests until chicks are fledged. Construction activities shall observe a 300 foot buffer for raptor nests. Mitigation Measure 4.a.b.d.6 Impacts to the riparian zone shall be minimized to protect local wildlife movement corridors. Open space fences shall not include game wire, no -climb wire, or impenetrable fencing, or shall have animal passages at 150 foot intervals. Exterior lights shall be low watt and shielded to direct lightingdo the ground. Page 16 . . City Hall Creek Restoration MND.pt.dcc . w"�ob CITY OFATASCADERO IAUML STUDY Initial Study 2006-0013 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significantwith Significant Impact PPN 2006-XXXX Impact, Mitigation Impact Atascadero Creek Bank Restoration'Project Incorporation Mitigation Measure 4.c.1 Where impacts to the riparian areas are proposed, the following steps must be completed depending upon jurisdictional areas affected: 1. Permits must be obtained, as appropriate, from the California Department of Fish and Game.(DFG Code 1600), the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Section 404 of the Clean Water Act), the Regional Water Quality Control Board (Section 401 of the Clean Water Act) 2. A mitigation, monitoring, and reporting plan will be prepared and approved by the County and other jurisdictional agencies, as appropriate (i.e., California Department of Fish and Game, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and the Regional Water Quality Control Board). Riparian mitigation will increase the aerial extent of riparian habitat on site at a two -to -one ratio (created riparian area to.impacted riparian area). Functions and values of the created riparian zone must be equivalent to or better than the existing habitat. 3. Riparian habitat mitigation will provide enhancements for listed species known to be present in the area. Enhancements shall include re-creating natural sinuosity within the stream channel, and root wad placement to increase the quality of pool habitat. 4. Riparian mitigation will include weed abatement, native tree mitigation planting and native shrub planting between EI Camino Real and Lewis Avenue Bridge. Weed abatement shall especially focus on removal of non-native blackberry and honeysuckle. Mitigation trees shall include 16 coast live oaks and up to 68 California walnuts (5 -gallon size). Native blackberries, elderberries, and willows shall be planted as the dominant understory cover. Mitigation 4.e.1. Protect and monitor all trees to be impacted and fully protected within 20 feet of disturbance. Provide protection during construction for all trees not proposed focremoval. a: All native trees and specimen trees within 20 feet of proposed disturbance will be tagged with permanent numbered tags (round aluminum tags, 1.25 inches in diameter) b. Tree protection fencing (orange construction fencing) will be installed at the outer limit of the drip line with t -posts placed no further apart than six (6) to eight (8) feet. Construction fencing will be firmly affixed with wire or zip,ties. Trees that may be impacted shall be protected with construction fencing, depending on the impacts expected within the dripline. c. An environmental monitor shall conduct a worker education meeting for the contractors and operators prior to ground -breaking activities. The briefing shall include a walk-through to identify each of the trees in the work area: the trees to be protected, and the trees that may be impacted or removed. d. The monitor shall check daily during active construction to determine if the listed trees are being protected. Mitigation Measure 4.e.2 All impacts and disturbance within the root zone shall be documented and reported to the project manager and to the arborist who must treat damaged branches and roots. Mitigation Measure 4.e.3 . Replace trees that are removed. To offset the loss of native tree canopy and total tree .numbers, trees will be planted to;replace canopy lost. The City of Atascadero free ordinance requires mitigation for native trees removed. The sizes protected are over two inches,(2") dbh for native deciduous trees and four inches (4") dbh for all other protected native trees. Replacement trees shall be 5 -gallon size, locally.grown, native stock of the same species as the removed tree. One City mitigation option for commercial project tree removals is for every deciduous native tree, plant four 5 -gallon trees for every 6 inches dbh of tree removed; for other native trees on their list, plant two 5 -gallon trees for every 6 inches dbh of tree removed. A second mitigation option is to plant larger size _ specimens to reduce the quantity of.replacements using a ratio based on box size. (For example, a 24 inch box tree equals two 5 -gallon locally grown trees:)— Mitigation Measure 4.e.4. Pruning and wound care shall be done under the supervision of a certified arborist. All cuts to branches or roots over 1.5 inches in diameter will be treated, as appropriate, to reduce fungal, bacterial, and insect infections. A certified arborist or tree care specialist shall be contracted to care for damaged roots and branches during construction in the vicinity of oaks. 0427166 _ _Pagel 7 - City Hall Creek Restoration MND.pLdoc - - X CITY-OFATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY n Initial Stud ZO06-0013 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Y Signiflmnt Significant with Significant Impact PPN 2006-XXXX Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Atascadero Creek Bank Restoration Project Mitigation Measure 4. e.5 Prepare and implement a native tree planting plan. The mitigation plan will include tree planting, protection, maintenance, and monitoring for five (5) years: Success criteria will include tree height and total numbers of live trees at the end of five years. The final landscape bond amount will not be returned until the success criteria have been met. Mitigation Measure 4.e.6 At building permit review, all tree protection requirements shall be shown on grading plans. All trees to be protected will be clearly shown on grading and drainage plans. The tree protection recommendations shall be consistent with Appendix C of the Biological Assessment will be shown on the plans. Mitigation Measure 4.e.7 Prepare restoration plan for Atascadero Creek between site of future pedestrian bridge and Lewis Avenue. Mitigation Measure 4.e.8: Grading, excavation, and all mitigation measures shall be consistent with the City of . Atascadero Tree Ordinance. Special precautions when working around native trees include: 1. All existing trees outside of the limits of work shall remain. 2. Earthwork shall not exceed the limits of the project area. 3. Low branches in danger of being tom from trees shall be pruned prior to any heavy equipment work being done. 4. Vehicles and stockpiled material shall be stored outside the dripline of all trees. 5. All trees within the area of work shall be fenced for protection with 4 -foot chain link, snow or safety fencing placed per the approved tree protection plan. Tree protection fencing shall be in place prior to any site ( '1 excavation or grading. Fencing shall remain in place until completion of all construction activities. 6. Any roots that are encountered during excavation shall be clean cut by hand and sealed with an approved tree seal. 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES —Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of El El a historical resource as defined in'15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of El ® El an archaeological resource pursuant to '15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred El 0 outside of formal cemeteries? SOURCES: Project Description;. Planning Staff Site Visit; Land Use Element EIR; DISCUSSION: . . 5.a.b.c.d.) No known historical, archeological or cultural sites have been found or documented in the vicinity of.the project. Mitigation Measure 5.b.1: Should any cultural resources be unearthed during site development work, the provisions of CEQA -Section 15064.5, will be followed to reduce impacts to a non-significant level. 16. GEOLOGY AND_SOILS — Would the project: Page 18 - City Hall Creek Restoration MND.pt.dx A54 CITY OFATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? SOURCES: Project Description; Planning Staff Site Visit; Land Use Element EIR, Project Description, Biological Assessment, Althouse and Meade. DISCUSSION: 6.a.) The project is not located on any known earthquake faults. .. 6.b.) Construction activities on the site will be required to comply with sedimentation and erosion control measures prescribed by the city engineer. 6.c.d.e.) The U.S. Department of Agriculture map in the Soil Survey of San Luis Obispo County, California, Paso Robles Area (1993) maps the general soil type of the on the property as the Still -Elder -Metz complex. This complex is very deep, nearly level to moderately sloping, well drained and somewhat excessively drained clay loams, loams, and loamy sands. It occurs through north San Luis Obispo County in, association with the Salinas River and other large water courses. Numerous detailed soil types are described within this general complex. The detail soil type on the terraces is Still clay loam, with zero to two percent slopes (208). This very deep, nearly level, well drained soil formed in alluvium derived from sedimentary rock. Included in this map unit are small areas of Mocho clay loam and Metz loamy sand. This soil has moderately slow permeability with a high to very high available water capacity. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches. Because of the mild slope this soil has a low erosion hazard. Still clay loam is in capability class 1 (14) irrigated and capability unit IVc-1 (14) non -irrigated.. Soils in capability class I have no limitations for farming. It is considered to be one of the most productive soils in the survey area. Soils in the channel are formed ` from recent alluvium. No soils. mitigation was recommended in the Biological Assessment. The property contains no n -- ---- unusual geological formations.-:- _ 0421106 ��` - Page 19 - - City Hall Creek Restoration MND.o.doc Initial Study 2006-0013 Potentially Significant Less Than Significantwith Less Than significant No Impact PPN 2006-XXXX Impact Mitigation Incorporation Impact Atascadero Creek Bank Restoration Project a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Pdolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? D iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including 17 liquefaction? iv) Landslides? b) Result in substantial soil erosion or.the loss of topsoil? c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral n spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? SOURCES: Project Description; Planning Staff Site Visit; Land Use Element EIR, Project Description, Biological Assessment, Althouse and Meade. DISCUSSION: 6.a.) The project is not located on any known earthquake faults. .. 6.b.) Construction activities on the site will be required to comply with sedimentation and erosion control measures prescribed by the city engineer. 6.c.d.e.) The U.S. Department of Agriculture map in the Soil Survey of San Luis Obispo County, California, Paso Robles Area (1993) maps the general soil type of the on the property as the Still -Elder -Metz complex. This complex is very deep, nearly level to moderately sloping, well drained and somewhat excessively drained clay loams, loams, and loamy sands. It occurs through north San Luis Obispo County in, association with the Salinas River and other large water courses. Numerous detailed soil types are described within this general complex. The detail soil type on the terraces is Still clay loam, with zero to two percent slopes (208). This very deep, nearly level, well drained soil formed in alluvium derived from sedimentary rock. Included in this map unit are small areas of Mocho clay loam and Metz loamy sand. This soil has moderately slow permeability with a high to very high available water capacity. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches. Because of the mild slope this soil has a low erosion hazard. Still clay loam is in capability class 1 (14) irrigated and capability unit IVc-1 (14) non -irrigated.. Soils in capability class I have no limitations for farming. It is considered to be one of the most productive soils in the survey area. Soils in the channel are formed ` from recent alluvium. No soils. mitigation was recommended in the Biological Assessment. The property contains no n -- ---- unusual geological formations.-:- _ 0421106 ��` - Page 19 - - City Hall Creek Restoration MND.o.doc CITY OF ATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY nInitial Study 2006-0013 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant significantwith significant Impact PPN 2006-XXXX Impact Mitigation Impact Atascadero Creek Bank Restoration Project Incorporation Mitigation Measure 6.b.1: The building permit application plans shall include erosion control measures to prevent soil, dirt, and debris from entering the storm drain system during and after construction. A separate plan shall be submitted for this purpose and shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer at the time of Building Permit application. 7. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS -- Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely El 0 hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one - quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? 1 1 d) Be located on a.site which is included on a list of 17 hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan area El D , or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people living or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would El 1-1 IIIE711 the project result in a safety hazard for people living or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, VN injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? --. - _ -_ SOURCES: Project description, General Plan Land Use Element; 3/09/04 - -- DISCUSSION - ---- 7a.b.c.) The project is not anticipated to generate or involve use of significant amounts of hazardous materials. -There.- _- - are no known hazardous materials on the site or nearby. - 7.d.) The property is not a listed hazardous material site. 7e.f.) Thero e p p rty is not near an airport. --- 7g.h.)The site is within the Fire Department's five-minute or less response area. 71 Maims Maims --.-____ _ __-_— ___ - Page,20 City Hall Creek Restoration MNO.ptacc -. - I CTfY OF ATASCADERO INPI7AL STLIDY Initial Study 2006.0013 Potentially Less Than Less Than No significant Significantwith Significant Impact PPN 2006-XXXX Impact Mitigation Impact Atascadero Creek Bank Restoration Project Incorporation 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY —Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge ❑ ❑ Elrequirements? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere ❑ ❑ ❑ substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of previously -existing nearby wells would drop to a level that would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site ❑ ❑ ® ❑ or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site ❑ or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially.increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner that would result in flooding on- or off-site? ' e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the ❑ capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? 0 Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? g) Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures that would impede or redirect flood flows? ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ I) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, ❑ ❑ ❑ injury, or death involving flooding, including flooding as a IvEli result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? ❑ ❑ ❑ ®- - SOURCES: Project description, Flood Insurance Rate Map 060700 0004 B (1/20/82); DISCUSSION: 8a.) The construction will not violate water quality standards. 8b.) The project will not deplete ground water supplies. --- -- 8c.d.e.f.) The project will not substantially alter any drainage course. The flow of the creek will be culverted during ' construction so as not to drastically change the existing flow of the creek. Once construction is completed, the flow " will be released into a channel right beside the existing channel path with the new concrete wall, 5 -foot wide terrace, and vegetated protection so the water flow will not continue to erode more land underneath the existing City Hall -- 04121106 - - - - - Page 21 city Han creek Restoration MND.pLdco V om2utii�. ■..its. CTCV OF ATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY nLess Than Less Than No Initial Study 2006-0013 sgnificant s. nificatwith significant Impact PPN 2006-XXXX Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Atascadero Creek Bank Restoration Project Building.(see Attachment 3, Restoration Exhibit). Construction activities are subject to review for compliance. with C drainage and grading regulations. Drainage will not be permitted to create or intensify any hazards for persons or property in the vicinity. No runoff of water mitigations were included in the Biological Assessment. B.g.h.i.) Future uses will be outside of the 100 -year flood hazard area. 81j.) The project area is not subject to innundation by tsunami. Mitigation Measure 8.e.f.1: The City is responsible for ensuring that all contractors are aware of all storm water quality measures and that such measures are implemented. Failure to comply with the approved construction Best Management Practices will result in the issuance of correction notices, citations, or stop orders. 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING - Would the project a) Physically divide an established community? ❑ ❑ ❑ b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or ❑ ❑ Elregulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project NJ (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? ❑ ❑ ❑ . SOURCES: Land Use Element, Circulation Element, project description, Land Use Element EIR; DISCUSSION: 9.a.) The project will not physically divide an established community. 9.b.) The project will not conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or'regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project. 9.c:) The project is consistent with the open space and conservation policies identified in the General Plan. 10. MINERAL RESOURCES -- Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important . ❑ El Z. mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? SOURCES: Project Description -Photos; Planning Staff Site Visit. ,. DISCUSSION: -- _10.a.b.) No mining is proposed as a part of this project. No known mineral resources have been identified in the area. 11. NOISE --Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? - oamms — Page 212— City Hall Creek Restoabon MND.ptticc Initial Study 2006-0013 PPN 2006-XXXX Atascadero Creek Bank Restoration Project b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ground -borne vibration or ground -borne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? CITY OFATASCADERO INTTIAL STUDY Potentially Significant Less Than Significantwith Less Than Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Incorporation Impact El ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would El ❑ Elthe project expose people living or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? SOURCES: Project description, Noise Element, Noise Ordinance, Acoustical Design Manual; DISCUSSION: - 11a.b.c.d.) Construction is expected to involve some heavy machinery and use of impact tools that make noise. Noise levels on the site are thus expected to be raised temporarily. The future use is not expected to generate unacceptable levels of noise to future adjacent commercial, public, or residential uses. 11.e.f.) The project is not located within an airport land use plan or private airstrip. Mitigation Measure 11.d.1: All construction activities shall comply with the City of Atascadero Noise Ordinance for hours of operation. 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING - Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either ❑ El ❑ directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? . b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, 1:1 El 1:1necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the El El Elconstruction of replacement housing elsewhere? SOURCES: Project description, General Plan Land Use Element; DISCUSSION: --- 12.a. The General Plan identifies this site as open space. No residential development will be taking place. 12.b.c. No homes or people are located in this area. 13. PUBLIC SERVICES --- ---- ._ -,04/21106 - Page 23 City Hall Creek Restoration MND.pt.doc 16mimv::�9 CITY OF ATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY n Initial Stud '2006.00'13 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Study - significant Significantwith significant Impact PPN 2006-XXXX Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Atascadero Creek Bank Restoration Project a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? D Police protection? ❑ ❑ ❑ Schools? 00 ❑ Parks? 0 11 11 Other public facilities? El +� SOURCES: Project description, Land Use Element EIR; I 1 DISCUSSION: Develooment Impact Fees: Development Impact Fees will be requlred'of any new project for which a building penult is issued. The concept of the impact fee program is to fund and sustain improvements which are needed as a result of new development as stated in the General Plan and other policy documents within the fee program. Development Impact Fees fall into the following categories: Drainage Fees; Streets, Road, Bridge Fees; Sewer Fees; Public Safety Fees; and Park Fees, Miscellaneous Fees. In addition, school fees are collected by the Atascadero Unified School District. The amount of impact fees to be paid will be determined at the time of issuance of building permit. Fire and Police: Impact fees are charged for new development, to help pay the cost of providing new facilities to serve the expanding city. The Fire Department of the City of Atascadero has indicated that it will be able to adequately service the proposed project. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Fire Department. The City of Atascadero Police Department has also indicated that the proposed project poses no problems to the police to adequately service it. Schools: At buildout, the city's population will overburden the existing school system unless additional classroom - space is added. The Atascadero Unified School District charges impact fees to fund additional schools as needed. State law restricts mitigation of school impacts to the levying of these fees and other measures adopted by the school district. Provision of adequate facilities for the population is the responsibility of the school district.. Fees will be required through construction permits for the residence. Parks: The city's Parks & Recreation Commission is committed to finding ways to continue to provide parks and other recreational opportunities to city residents as the city expands, thereby addressing cumulative impacts. Other public facilities: The construction of the project is not expected to have significant impacts on any other public facilities. 14. RECREATION — - a) Would the project increase the use of existing EN neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the - -= 04121/e6 .__ __- _- --._ - Page24,-,---_ - City Hall creesRestoration MND.pLdoc - r^m ' ❑ CITY OF ATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY Initial Study 2006-0013 Potentially Less Than Less Than No PPN 2006-XXXX Significant Impact Significant with Significant Impact Mitigation Impact Atascadero Creek Bank Restoration Project ❑ Incorporation facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require ❑- ❑ ® ❑ the construction or expansion of recreational facilities that might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? SOURCES: Project description, Parks and Recreation Element; DISCUSSION: 14.a.b.) The project proposes a newly restored and vegetated creek bank. Pedestrians are expected to use the creek sidewalk behind City Hall. 15. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC —Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic that is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? . c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns,'including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? D Result in inadequate parking capacity? ❑ ❑ D. ❑ ❑ ❑ ® .. ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ® .. ❑ ❑ ❑ g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs El ❑ Elsupporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, IEEII bicycle racks)? SOURCES: Land Use Element, Circulation Element; Project Description DISCUSSION: 15a.b.c.d.e.f.g.)The restoration of a creek bank will not result in an increase of traffic in any way, shape or form. No -. air traffic patterns will be affected. Emergency access and parking will not need to be addressed. Altemative•. transportation will not be effected. 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS --Would the _- project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality _Control Board? - .-- -- -.-i b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing 04r21ro6 - - - --- — Page 25 Initial Study 2006-0013 PPN 2006-XXXX Atascadero Creek Bank Restoration Project CTTY OFATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant with significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation facilities, the construction of which could cause significant ❑ of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop environmental effects? below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water ❑ ❑ ❑ NZI drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the b) Does the project have impacts that are individually ❑ limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively . construction of which could cause significant environmental project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, effects? and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects that will " ❑ d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the ❑ El 1:1project -. oarzvoe Page 26 from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment 1:1 ❑ ❑ provider that serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to ❑ ❑ ❑ accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and ❑ El❑ regulations related to solid waste? SOURCES: Project description, Land Use Element (LUE) EIR; Project Plans, DISCUSSION: Water. No new infrastructure for water is needed at the project site. Sewer. Sewer discharge will be handled by an on City sewer connection. Storm Water. On-site storm water drainage has been designed to flow into the existing Morro Road drainage facilities. The existing facilities have been designed to handle run-off from this site at buildout. 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE — a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality ❑ of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually ❑ limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively . considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects that will " ❑ - cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either 1 directly or indirectly? -. oarzvoe Page 26 ' ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ City Hall Creek Restoration MND.pt.doc, CITY OFATASCADERO INITIAL STLIDY DISCUSSION: The proposed -project consists of an application for the restoration of the creek bank behind Atascadero City Hall. A creek walkway is proposed for pedestrians. The creek will be temporarily culverted so construction will not interfere with the flow of the creek. All native tree removals and work done in and around habitats of sensitive animals shall be done in accordance with the.aforementioned mitigation measures cited in the Biological Assessment for the project, as well as the City of Atascadero native tree ordinance. After construction is completed, more vegetation shall be planted along the creek bank to enhance aesthetics and creek bank plant life. SOURCES: General Plan Land Use Element, City of Atascadero, 2002 Zoning Ordinance, part of Municipal Code, City of Atascadero, as amended through 1999. Land Use Element Environmental Impact Report, Crawford, Mulled, & Clark, adopted 2002 CEQA Handbook, Air Quality Control District, August 1995 General Plan Safety Element, City of Atascadero, 2002 General Plan Circulation Element, 2002 General Plan Noise Element, adopted 2002 Acoustical Design Manual, Brown-Buntin Associates, 1991 Noise Ordinance, City of Atascadero, 1992 Guide for Developers, Atascadero Fire Department, 1998 draft Flood Insurance Rate Map, community -panel number 060700 0004 B, Federal Emergency Management Agency, January 20, 1982 Trip Generation, Institute of Traffic Engineers PROJECT -SPECIFIC SOURCES: Project description Creek Restoration Exhibit, February 2006 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Letter Native Tree inventory Report, Althouse and Meade. Biological Assessment, Althouse and Meade W rr Or u16u31rdlaulea +d SWLUCD fldx3 efueal7 � 18-3 412 weprot 4y s+. 0��0� Il>ad> 361-a .aro pscn 3�a �yex s >,a1s Oe 5' a°a" o l iD 3fd G09E5 '&3 �" S9b6£'PN a� ti �y�, Ngo s Sao aQ�a� Z't•S ....... ..... _..._:__._.._ _... .. S7lY130 ONY 371dOad TYM L•L•S. ..._.._....__._.._.......... .. _ _.. ... ... . '........... MI'm TYM s•L3 .... Do L'LJ . _ .._.......... __._..... ._:. ... ..__._.............. dYW OINdYaOOdOl 9•L2.........__._..._..........__..._ (n S•LO - :IOHiNQD HO/sON3 aNY'ONIa317M3Q'ONIOYNO NoLLDna1sNO3 - b'L7.._. C7 CLO ......... ....._ ......... ... _ _ ...... ....._. ONIOYaO HS/N/d - rLa............_....._....._..._...._.__........ ........... aN3e37aILYS31oN i•L7 ............. .. ............. .. .... .... .... ......... 133Hs 3711E Q L -Li a.e4t eo d— al4d-Sodo7 eW vP p". -,-p —A --S n4a -; *,rN,yau.g r r qr j M__., r a (D 70HINOD A3Aans s--" I•u Ipd a se •I4el?—) Podell ILoiewuq —.L O (My apd a - lq l!-.) luewttrasq I.MEfo.g (17S-M"g r -N Md) —1 .—fSv3 Sullwi.S ..p—.;V prtodwd (OS -{LS. -L•79 roM eP3) •ayned wNUS 4Yr3 L4 Paa'�+d to a.arPeewwoaaa /earuyae7o>O psawr7 -opraylards Pur quswnaog;-4-2 lsl7 s1N3kvnooa a31vi:)ossv - rrres n lo,>P....I V - (D I1 -W Luz m (D D NZ S W Cn 77 Cl T_ (D O 0 O rr Or u16u31rdlaulea +d SWLUCD fldx3 efueal7 � 18-3 412 weprot 4y s+. 0��0� Il>ad> 361-a .aro pscn 3�a �yex s >,a1s Oe 5' a°a" o l iD 3fd G09E5 '&3 �" S9b6£'PN a� ti �y�, Ngo s Sao aQ�a� Z't•S ....... ..... _..._:__._.._ _... .. S7lY130 ONY 371dOad TYM L•L•S. ..._.._....__._.._.......... .. _ _.. ... ... . '........... MI'm TYM s•L3 .... _ _....... ... ....... ..._ - ....... -- "�' � NV7d 33a1 L'LJ . _ .._.......... __._..... ._:. ... ..__._.............. dYW OINdYaOOdOl 9•L2.........__._..._..........__..._ ................___............. NY7d NOIAWN01631f N011Y13O3A S•LO - :IOHiNQD HO/sON3 aNY'ONIa317M3Q'ONIOYNO NoLLDna1sNO3 - b'L7.._. __ _....._........ ..................... ..... .. ... ..... sN01103S SSOa7 CLO ......... ....._ ......... ... _ _ ...... ....._. ONIOYaO HS/N/d - rLa............_....._....._..._...._.__........ ........... aN3e37aILYS31oN i•L7 ............. .. ............. .. .... .... .... ......... 133Hs 3711E X3ON1133HS L -Li a.e4t eo d— al4d-Sodo7 eW vP p". -,-p —A --S n4a -; *,rN,yau.g r r qr j M__., r a 70HINOD A3Aans s--" I•u Ipd a se •I4el?—) Podell ILoiewuq —.L (My apd a - lq l!-.) luewttrasq I.MEfo.g (17S-M"g r -N Md) —1 .—fSv3 Sullwi.S ..p—.;V prtodwd (OS -{LS. -L•79 roM eP3) •ayned wNUS 4Yr3 L4 Paa'�+d to a.arPeewwoaaa /earuyae7o>O psawr7 -opraylards Pur quswnaog;-4-2 lsl7 s1N3kvnooa a31vi:)ossv - rrres n lo,>P....I V - 1-21 ouprr7 13 LO6S I1 -W Luz 33321aav ills "-9ooz u:39mmN als VIN210-417W) 40?JgaVDSV.LV JO A110 Hod NOIIVI0I93U 31NVO 3133HO OZ13avosviv l nYat OM dVIN A.UNIOIA I r N011V001103!'029 3T'af ON dVIV NOIIVO07 3116 81N3WHOV-UV 77VH Alit s--" 1/'.T NZ - "-9ooz u:39mmN als VIN210-417W) 40?JgaVDSV.LV JO A110 Hod NOIIVI0I93U 31NVO 3133HO OZ13avosviv l nYat OM dVIN A.UNIOIA I r N011V001103!'029 3T'af ON dVIV NOIIVO07 3116 81N3WHOV-UV X 'SLHS 30 a36-N 1v101 .AOHJ35 - _'V/\ S508.7 11101-fLW 035 Y_- ODM MM-0 um HIM /M nva70YN bR ON 133HSS1N ONf103 SI 1IV130 3?J3HM 2139YIf7N 13335 I HS3113a 1133 LW AAI 31)d 1NILY' d" xxxxxx 1:131-13-1 1Y130 371!1 1It/130 d STM^ AYM ^M 3VI1K2IvA AMVDAN azr -ON NOI1VJ131J3dS MIS 03013M 35Y1al15alYM SM sM M)UNOUO3Sa31M x1M - 6MP'cajDNa111 'Noa11307 -oN nu S709WAS ]:)WIN 62 YA aim a31 YM so 7N S31-OM M31 OM 306M M d oan AB 03NJ3HJ d0i13tl0 10 a'fA\ I !pM amit HI M 1VAJIH OH a3Yod 3SWH AMH AIH &I DCS A8 NMVaO '�� -\1 AIO {p * LM'd.3 K YAM 1*11a31 1x31 1NOd 35NIH 7NIOd 1111 dH dH Z" 90/Zl/90 31Vo w SoM DN t1 0 3did AYA 031JIa1N 9N/I") Ofinvnii 3 an7 7YSMVA d0A 0A 3N'i W )MY8GAH a30Y3H 3N3UH131 pd A VH a0N YVA dY010NYH DH - Z�M043330718 130/33 H �D a� �� S3unan lm3i NOnnOo Ln 347VA 31Y0 AO -V, TIM ,b 101 A! ONION) 31nMn Kid SNO77YO Oa0 a ^�0 r �.3d0 6 10 301 301. AYO aid QD D N �0 - i' YNY13 x dol 80 a OaYfp XY389 30VW 1819 117 ay! f pagos�p .-v P-0., 1p )-*.Ios -q-,I&. Br4 IFF D�U 7 Y (n - 31Y20 30 d01 91 WINYAM AM rapjr lwm 6UgwrbDj wyw Dfa C Pw a.IiDJ a W n - ONLI003 30 101 di N077YO 7Y0 pofod > o ax w w , aro 4! 14 1111 4 Br Io m D ap-d soils vi-p ,J r AHa'7i0dY31 dna! 3971 Y83dn31 .1231 m•� 6 vosow Z N (-) 3''!0{6313! ONYu3X 0310l1USM751H3n1 Y3a1 731 SYD D Djubraw o7 aso-.1w. Ad.; -4 -6-WP-40 7010 t4ft Mf" O O _ B&D 30 All 01 A, x co D wo uo!ma a d ou 10 1W q pl-.fp uop PA 47 a pa-W aq of sa ap 001 XX77B ugq.6grw uo9ojps k.-d-1 pa70ja6ana. aq IP4s soaA Pagrnlgp RY Z O 15naH1 ZO 9Nu003 913 CD �• XI kws 133.1 J1 dl!C f F'sods.W ID /D pmd?p CD D 73315 AS us 3ovlans USIN1 Sd M PW g!r aW -4 p.Dua. rM s-9 aW y paPa& P.w1Dw MIN A- ''7 's Q i)) @609/'15 OLS 71VM 3)Y3 NIYn 39101 MOd n3 Puo > Yadd YaDw Yam > t 1x.11 v A o fiw7 I ! M / 1si RY pJ!1 u aq Rays A1u6w P. Auwp DW 'pum/ DD spmzoy 1prs Aw JI '>]a •Fa11w Cn M)U Yl$ S 39NYld D'U grcocbp 1601 D swipp-, 1;-pp Ypodn-a> r0 p. pzn4 6ulsua Aw Dj 13315 SS31NIY1S 155 I 10110 Mrow4lma Pw bup>p buunp aj!s aW gob9ra+v jp4s DlDorlao0 'I (fl 511 kw-:c Amwn 4 INYNUHA3aLd Hi (D 7.- Q - SNOu VDW3d5 03� ,� �� (D SIM 30 "3'sAs'Y"°"YM13LM 6 LVoli 113HSM 33 $310N NOI10I1211SN00 Q O O 1003 3a'YJ70S 1� 801dYOY 9M7dn00 39NYII rd (n O NOUY8Yd3S d3$ DMISfx3 1SDG X3 nay p7-dun p 7a'ag M)u035 NIYaO ITWIS 03S is 3M1 M31YM 133!71333 193 p.. 'spowa. ' ood- d. s .»! p N>on 7 M1 1 6opq l 0b isp ill 31n0kcs Hos AYM F0Y3 M3 wy p. o Aq 'aia U m 'ploay aq I.0 wlaww0 u 4>v wo Aao O I)OSS Nl/10L7HLnO5 as 311/0 IYJUM3K ON3 113 sai p do 7D 9001 pw sayxnp o1 gDodury 7s!r09a 1Da,/owl al pMda. aq RNF q>0dLq AYM 03134Y& JO 3003 1 M3ndInO3 M13 1103 -q try 'slD+oua .4 pro s>aq D1 q..du.. -I.-IF P-9- I>af d 31 AYM _O 1H91a,y/a IN3n3AYd >0 3903 d3 Js!5gwq Iaalod DW Jo I-Ido w!d lno4tu uplola6>n p.M)W D! aPow 3Nfk31 YA (in Y3a1Nn) MYa my7YO0am NOLIVA313 0313 A37313 aq Ross good q ON gxd.p UDUDdu RD -1!1-R04s }s!bF'o4 1Da11y YI I/t7W 18 3727 3VY4 ADa3N3 753 asuadx> s w x. wo o s Pu01 1 1 141 1 !W NOu.1 10ad 3u06 X108' dsa OHnoa0 9Nusoa 03 ,roxxsr5 a >x DDx w G>DMdD. ll�o4s wlxqum aW xq pa ysap p1S TYM 9NINIY13a Tim 131 1N3n13fl 113 R-.. uy anywu cavo puo I-- k9on. wumww .(aura x 03NnO3a W388 ONru3q 03LOnalsAw 34itvwdYA3 -A03 jp Jo bv9p- Adod w wgq apd aW /114 Mod- p io1>oywa 141 fl - I0M3)LI01NGd 3did 3138Oho0 0.3oa01Nl3d 19138 '. dW Nd1113a BN0 ON3 :MWO 7VINDZkOH ON3 203 03 - - - Awr6ua ubrsap a(p pw I-podap byaw!b✓3 NO aW to pANddD . 308)NOO (13)W41413a 0a ONnOaI3V3 83 - - .q d --6u 'sbu!ww ns - D aril sn10Ya Ord a HJV3 V3 Q. 6. p 6up�od o asodmd j s DDr oad s w su asa 141 PH 1 141 % Maj J. P 0Id 4J >D7YIOYa 1H3n3AYd 1Md Ay"m AM Pas W Wsolwd m wq'ngsuw>aW umy a0pap m w sa�up>.L. Prof a7om>x Wo 'ajaldum 'Iaawn M 1 . 1104s !>0gwo uDiwjsuoa 141 ZI D /-1 Nouo-isdhM 7YOua31 .:01NIOd Nd SONMVW 30NYlsla SaM0 1510 0.�ads'u� o 1 141 l 00:'1>ols!los Dol 07 a' aVJ r^ l 3018011-0 UNLUIOd ,11d AO6N3n10 kid-, o7 +Voa aW ,(oD0r1f Ilea wixywo ad suold aW umq yaw 10013SY9 Alliun D(.6nd A0H3oll" 39 1NOd and Id 131M dodo vio Yp0 ft q aW p sw �Wi6w1> &uw aW talo Ao .o aig Aq p- q #.f ay�W of ppy .4 O04s a 'PNJ 141 oAow �. J HW 36MOS aid OWIDW 6d 3 M10 Q350dn0030 00 twa d .-P u a vD aas>D un a o sp 1041 I aV 1 op aW w tupwar 1swW. D 1003 3YVrOS Mad ON(pd 35d 79130 130 A'ow buu D 7uaugmdap bu3 'U:J 147 p N 419 w bxlx D7>adcn x10 ay1 'it O 311NK1 7109!{31 35X3131 _0 1NOd 3A7YA 9NUY7!A03a 3a1I553ad ?Aad Aad a3rfY,O 7VMMION (TIONY) I 1T�7 1 ! 1 34� 310X IMOd Y1130 q P1z!RWIs pw a>ojtl u sl w!1o7a6anav puo 'pyw> lwuwpas y uw 'D6Duorp IP 1041 AI!i-- Ipc4s wau!6u3 ayj •upl>adsu puy of 101d 'll Tu!'W J!>ads 7>a.Jo1d aW o! Apy 'p-b- aro ?!-ad luawq- prm8 Pga00 AjRDDD AOuO]4AV0 >Il IHOd dd d 0did 0.n' 'A o2flo ONY713M (mondisNOO AO MO -V LBO :30NY88n1510 >O V38Y Lamm pw!6aa puo 'awo9 y q--4 l0 1da0 q -10u3 /o sa33 A Y DI 3Nn Al K3cOad 99!{.1/100 OM7 u6a3 'ualwoosa b.LM 1wWd aq IL'• 4>01 Jo O 31917 7YX83K WU)35a31M _O 1Nnd NOu03Sa31N1 _YJ 1N0d -,vw b S/IOnNUN00 (n0i) 190.7 sr A sua dams L05 ayj q apow iopwwwox. 4!, pFJ ayj way pu!ojgo sal /o s6u!lsaj upoAwo >xgquasadav o la m.1y1a4w Pw sajygn y Aw jo .JooM aW xqm 30Y9 3al1S538d 0d 10na1sN00 1SNOD aMw_a q-)3rulsw> JD R"I ayj 7D pauwalap aq q w uploas jua-d Iowj aLo 01 R04s p. wgomoaa l0 lois 141 01 .Rud sfp uaI o1 ow7 MRYZ-ZI9-ODB-I NY1uS303d 3N311H13A10d O3d 3d 31380900 hou)vd7R00 ON00 dA00 'xl!V>ol P-dsr.P P. w !I o jo Jo psodsrp aq Ip4s al!s 141 -.9 p-, ">I> 's;d 'sa>w7 70 (YSN lap >.ruar Punwbapw 1x71mo IFF wlxyam-M-;suoo ayj "u0B>Msum 10 pals W 01 +Md p>'J!l0a aq I- sa!-dua> 4.Rgn HY '6 C- - -_ 3Aa/C7 7YOuM3K OMIOdn00 d0 Mod OKOd 1110NV370 34d 7Y13n 031Y Y&W Do d10 De>ouDris 6u srxa�J�� Fraj a paungwAw p>uo sAwl saml>Ms 1 In 'p9!loa q II 4s uw0 41 'punDl o spiDZDy rpns xw JI is 'uo.'7>Mswo 6-p wNj by9>ai0rl mJ puo sa!j!lr> 1 raylo No nq!Nn w) 313a)AV71N3M30 ONY'U&d 07d K313nuN30 un 'p!sjow D!w�ro I. gwdap a6.ol m sw!1opuM/ 'suapn 'spodssa> so yam sa.nj>rujs pa p Ro p7o>M cans !0>M / Nlp!t pal pro rofin n bw D bur w uodsa. a dwDo \ '•; 3an1 YAalYI ONnOdYg7 30130.1 3a(UVA8W 3J 1Nod 00d Od UVTO6w 55/?5 b p>lnq D scop- a Pally so P. scald all w uwoys jou wnDMswD of Prozoy s AuD D wi Dada p w buena bum rs a D6! sa.u! l !sa 1 .7 "m41r p P Pal. 7 l HDys wj>DywO .6 11°1 aumsm Roos all !p! saaz6o wjDoyw> w9angswo ayJ 'gdwawddo v u uo9oxl n Aow sam s wills any.. aW Wo vDld nW w vways aq Jou l>M �� WHM310 N0 mn N/YH9 T do owp Iq!s-d., ag IP4s Dpajwo 'mop *- o 7aays 'Al dad 6MudpD AUc wdn INds Puno.6rapw .ayj. puo A)w bujsrra 110 '-..H -I!s g0! 147 wlm - io m no 13L3MK31N3J 00 3AMIN30 3 D lsnp 1-6 o1 m Au= o , . M P.L o.J- D papajo.d-pgla.. aq Ipys Ion- D 'pimdswy '.- 'sa>opns 'B sa!IA 1 p-6.p. /o wno>ol ail! a Jap of apow unq sou l Ail W 'B _ NO 00 3d7d NON 1SY0 ON0.73S Mad JIM OIB70 dO 530 "d poll p.--j IW pw pgrnls!p Ip pPoo.•66 IfY uo9DnyswD /o Ir01s pro 1!Wad 1ddY 1003 O1Bl0 A 6 v uw oadsw ou 6uwD.6 PW Pa4s!ICIDISa 1 Idwoo paaryxwaw w l0 ax R as 07 ..pd ppb. z lvavr S. wjoadsu W 'L 3EP,j ION 3)Y0s O1 ION M3BIoN Y/N Sly )YS-'b-7!10 131!!37 01 0161) Sao 0-0 ala9 wow w '6W a6 w .( w aq o�-lp pa o� n 6u! w d av Da a7 ,pawua plat g Ip4s uwJ>1- "p41aw ° 7 I 1 f I. 61 D Ipys P. wD s!yL vaso- pywo of pu!olrxow pw paDdad aq pays suajoAdo 6u!PD.6 ruoy 6u!11ra-a. sa>olms 'C 'DpaW 4 ..gD>dn? /0uJ 141 wow !Masud aq Ip4s s6 -41 pm». 10Y11fAOO M ION 1H 0IN pagmis!p In Ds;-.d-141 9aD 3 L :8 Wla o> + RECIS S NE (6261) nru YO wxhsK Ou3LO30 7YM7u YN wN 17YAI .0 AQJIO8 MB panod-wu w s pa.g s s! uogxgsum -y. pamd.-d aq 01 aro 6u!worp po-8 .balsa! pa'J ro ba. > ON/1o9H169N BN 3119 0388VB MB apo.6 o swro DDuas woPm I P. 41 41!+ suwjwap pyuw la q sapD.6 uuopun apuwd �g a DW suod oddo aDwuuD uw a am lsan 47 I r . I Paw aW wu 1 711 o 1 aW c o s n y o (8861) W1JVO 7YOUKiA NYDMOMY H18ON OAYN 34dV 7YDU6% N1938 317YA TY8 3AB AB lo!Ajow pau a4I l0 6u!oMd alp Di vasal gwwanodw! 1041 14911 Is- 1-10-3 L :J PaAla?6a. Y 9 77VA a0 X1Y8 MOB Dld -pow aq Ilo4s !sal P!o$ 'Aa .5 spo5 ay1 umy zjmda. Puo slf- !sal xq pgna> os P. -.9DDpxds pada, aps o7 ppi d- aq R04s peal- W.69.• dSd V 773M 1N31RnAOn NOR 3.17 MOIB DB BC-CSSI-O I'I1SY A9 Pau!w.ol>p aq o1 a ualxd-1 wnopa wgxdwoo a.40p. YD6 01 pi>Dduxn aq o N ? a '1'y c HN caw RYn IAN38 As IP4s wog. Pauopww awz ayj wopq scan>as IU u P!Ajpw puo p!Ajow A410 IN '•op9 iw I J+w 147 l0 W1 W .pd sx 833N.n�� S� �n 'fin ONIORlIB aw pw wnwap apDd4's p4s!uy wawlaq awz a41 g YS61D wnoodum> w!jop. D of pi>oduma 1q R04s ('op 'A- sjp..pa wlod 'gwys •a'! sam Ddoa ail . sp.oy wopq o 6 'S R.old pun D bupaaur Ar o.ddo Xq 1 ..ddo I70D'p - - nMIMn 310HNYn AVO aid SAOTYD Noor K3alll0Y3nNYn Mn HM mm Min 3191 A13Ni n8 39NYU OM18 Nan13a SUM N038 109 38 YD9 IaA7Dw qnS -La 693 sp.f 141 Aq pa^o.dd0 aq Ip,. lowjow IAJrpoq to suawA> sun0 'Mbu3 silos aN Aq paw 4lpano.Ew q do ;waj- amlgow wnuxldo jD palxduma apo s ssa od bu-7 sods' plallolap >q 904 uaull aP baa AI!0 147 x9 -so pa Md FA10w po pr>low apDfigos w cusp aq Mox sisal u.gaodua0 'R - - - - 11Ya OaVfYJ nY39 71,13n lfJBn - ]Karl) 7YIAVZWH NID38 08 puo ssawP!47 pl>Od- u ,I go pa>za of jou s-.Aq u pxltl aq Ip4s puajow IN Moan - - Jo a-. P. uo9oDM 147 al-!P. 4-P Rosa glow. 6u9saj /Mr1I- kmd of wed sAop SI pWu .-P 1q p- 4.1 nY nnnlxvn lYhem xvn 7L YR 3 vmmv AVMSY DAY ASSY -,15.3 spoS 141 Aq PD oddo waq sD4 .1!1141 to gp,vda.d plan pa..Id aq 1104s IN -N'Aaw6v3 WS 141 Aq sup7oDynads puo i*.d aW WP -cap- u -.P aq Mogs gsal AaS r ' (3dW3n 3011Nn) M313n w 3A7VA 3SY373a drr -ABY p.!nba,so p.-dad aq II04s - ICJ p-pwlDw Iwjadumo olu pWuaq aq Ip, s,Vj Ifo 'C 'Iwwlodap buuaapbv3 714a(110311H9aY H)8Y b:J ay7 fo pwaddo 141 o1 7>a!gns aq RWs ymw Ila po s .!p J!>ads 1331 11 AMYnIXOdddY xoaddY wprujswo 01 mld (sB-Ppnq lwodpo 01 sa>!nas Awes pw .aj.. sob 'pDulxp P. sp.Dpuols oapasolY /0 120 -0 Dj cam/vo> RWs "-.q-qsw> M Z MSdnnl 57 nnNlnn7Y nn7Y so yirs) swnopDlsu ;,-S6 pun 6u7s!aa pD sw!joxl all AJuan Ipys mpoquo0 aLU 'Z I 1N0d 11101 dl 31 mm 7Y 17Vdl 111116 IP4s !cabalsasuadaa UTgDn4rwo jD -Mi RD ID airs qo.1 w aq of scald p•..orddV 370.1139!1 81315{5 Md031 Y2031M II30NYAOV SdIV aww 048 Yw7d -W pw gwuaarlba. bupaax.d aW wawlaq 7MBwD 10 xm aW M xp.!7>ads-u sw-A 7 >4 Mw po p1R(a. ail W lwu+lrodaP pro 41- sl>0r1vw o C ONODd g 3dld 1N31L30 SOIS38SY d0Y xu x 75-ICSZI-15 aN goof Yj RrdY pw 6861 VI MP3 plop "Y!-d -4.(S 41ro3 q pwdaA bl..waubu3 41!9 1W 0l ualao9!Iou wld w su yd pa.o ddD paprw ..p loo] dv3vn 17 3L31DHO0 Du7YH&Y OY imdaH sw!70PwupDaa P?'a4aa7017 p!!u!'7 pw jiS-pgLO-,q 'on lmday, bx-15.3 app AluaO 6allog opl>nllsuao hV 'uo.q=4-o basals o1 road -w MZ 1sW p pagN ou T'M3l Yl lh NOONVBY Nay oaP-D1Y pasodDV aW pw 'od,Jn s!nl -S fo (I-.j a41 /0 suggoDynadt pw a..wwpm bWp.6 ayj aq pays )-aiDdap 6waaubu3 111.0 all lwv4ro6p bupaaubu3 H7 141 ' 310331 7 35YB 31YJ3aJ9Y 35YB 90Y 'BY 'Cf s!pccddv pa0 'CC aido.n 090 44w al-p-o M awp aq IpLp q- a?!s puo 6Mpw6 IIY 'I xq pa.oddo gruuad r /pyo sagd Inowim plrois aq pays aaJ>uisam oN 'I SN0Ilb'IA3218817 9310N JNIa1U0 9310N 7V213N30 X -S1HS 30 83"nN 1V101 TNM 3U--Y0I0HS ONON SNOI1VJ01ON 01.S OY _--/ � `\` \ .-\;• - esa � \ �'` \ � • e. (1330 NI,) On NO lv0 ] 03d5 � � \'7� � � • S000 N00 ""2Z00 / r :.01-V O1 ON 3111 31VOS 3IHdN80 \`mo� r :A 0311�vlvo do 03)- - -_•_./ ,•.\ _�G 101 MNVd `��" -\ ,!� :AB N-80 : ad� '316 -1 `. 90/Z Viv tcroc,; m3 J.- '.4 ON c — m nvH un 7NUSIX3 m > m '.... , �p/SS3d0 L ��'a - �` _ `,� _ x _.....><___ _ x1........._>E .... ...... .. O \ n o Yeo _ r --_ - - D W -- Zco Z ,c • .- oY3 yyj r D n m� \ ' U Av VJ l^ i i NMOHS SY 03MOTTY 3Nnd180 3381 XV0 6GONn ON06-) \ \ 1,H3nf sV3 a3KZ MNSIX3 d58 2i1Yf3731 3n iumn : „. ... `✓. ' , - - ,<..` _ :- -+-� .. q _ , ; �., - \` dS8 M 17vm" 10 servo/xMla! a3ruv Z.' u31J31Oad 3e of (S)33af avuSlx3 4 6 •. -! ._` _ .__ / -> _— r y , 83NDC7J 'OO1B lY 301M li Y o1 3JYe831 ,f Moaa'm 'r; 3!/lLLJnalS `JNa51%3 3H! 30 li3 DII/ 33x1 InHNM OhY 6r1/ ♦ RCGIS//- -- -.... '.-..._.. r- - - f73f0ad 3H! NOUYalp 3H1 Inp30no8H! 338! XM 3 PUP '38(U,47MS ONUSIX3 3H1 40 10M 5dn(15 �S . o ST ``ro \` - •. ti .� " ' ' _ T_ - _ _-. 3JNa3S NM1Nrm '3Nn sYJ %usx3 NouV,X17 31mlXo8,bv JNunOads 338)1 OW rot/ 'Z01/ 'Iol/ S -DU InNWM 340K3a n i —`_.- - - -- ✓-- j - _ __ ___ _ _ _ _ _. .. . _.. ..._.. _ __. _ - 9IJ 133)5 335 - 3Nn A/a3cVad Z Y10 133)5 OW SDt MVdO NtlNa'WJS 33S - T" 313a710HS o -t: - _ -� ON800 A183dq 03 J3 aad 3e al T._-- NOII `M '.X3U5lX3 d58 MH1u1 0371'Id dl0 _ - 1AM 9 AGN H11M ON3U3 3dld 30MIN80 HW 9 ONUSIX3 -- -r - eouro 83 --.�- .'- " SNDUVWYn USX3 HJlm !u 3dYf15 3Nn MOId N011 30VX35 1J Q340M38 3B Ol 3JN3G aVI151X3 � 1031Y1ad 3H! ,b - - _ _ - - - - oI3IG S833MW Od Jn01fJn0aH1 30Na35 N/11NAf1 l3'08 3d AU7un oNu51X3 �- .! »% k�-.. vt- N0UO3ap o13L3 S833N1JN3 N3d H! 1 Hl N1Y1NIIlY '31mIX0addY 311707 7/re 1008 ONUSIX3 HI38J =-- ' '^ t✓ur - -- a3 rJot7 3e of ore coa avuslx3 _ oN no7 3u a a3aNn - — `. NOlLJ38q OIIId Sa33N10N3 aid 311707 563)10 AB mron38 3B O1 I1/Jn Au711n ONu51X3 1J 3Hl 30 Ng1Y8n0 08YA N0UY8od810J W:l M063 (9MY180 T@& 1008 •... __�.. / - -- -. < N0038C 013!3 Sa33N7N3 aid 3YUJ 7M1 111d5 MGN HIM 63d 3dn5 ONY d330 Id f XOaddl •UOd ON3d330 '3JYId38 ONY 310038 -.91* Y 3JH3d MNn NIYH,7 `.AVUSIA3. 30Y80 JNUSIX3 fQlm XMe 3dO7S 7YX634-WN 0Nu9X3 - NOUYJ07 IMIX08ddY 34075 XM 1 f Z NOS913 3138JNOJ 03SOdX3 ONUSU3 F- .... ¢. . y , - . • _ 3d075 XM 1: f Igf '37✓1d M lJ3108d - IMA 17373 ONUSIX3 .., 133)5 335 - 3JYaip1 Soul Jd S 7 L i' �'�1 37YId M 1J3108d - a'A'M3015 313a0N00 aVU5U3 :9310N 3ON3213-4321 J \: MY N3'JV1N3073PJJsV1V - - ...'�' V J J/y1510700H,7S 03131Nn Oa3 083 W>3 ( _R 17 T _. a r D n m� \ ' U Av VJ l^ i i NMOHS SY 03MOTTY 3Nnd180 3381 XV0 6GONn ON06-) \ \ 1,H3nf sV3 a3KZ MNSIX3 d58 2i1Yf3731 3n iumn : „. ... `✓. ' , - - ,<..` _ :- -+-� .. q _ , ; �., - \` dS8 M 17vm" 10 servo/xMla! a3ruv Z.' u31J31Oad 3e of (S)33af avuSlx3 4 6 •. -! ._` _ .__ / -> _— r y , 83NDC7J 'OO1B lY 301M li Y o1 3JYe831 ,f Moaa'm 'r; 3!/lLLJnalS `JNa51%3 3H! 30 li3 DII/ 33x1 InHNM OhY 6r1/ ♦ RCGIS//- -- -.... '.-..._.. r- - - f73f0ad 3H! NOUYalp 3H1 Inp30no8H! 338! XM 3 PUP '38(U,47MS ONUSIX3 3H1 40 10M 5dn(15 �S . o ST ``ro \` - •. ti .� " ' ' _ T_ - _ _-. 3JNa3S NM1Nrm '3Nn sYJ %usx3 NouV,X17 31mlXo8,bv JNunOads 338)1 OW rot/ 'Z01/ 'Iol/ S -DU InNWM 340K3a n i —`_.- - - -- ✓-- j - _ __ ___ _ _ _ _ _. .. . _.. ..._.. _ __. _ - 9IJ 133)5 335 - 3Nn A/a3cVad Z Y10 133)5 OW SDt MVdO NtlNa'WJS 33S - T" 313a710HS o -t: - _ -� ON800 A183dq 03 J3 aad 3e al T._-- NOII `M '.X3U5lX3 d58 MH1u1 0371'Id dl0 _ - 1AM 9 AGN H11M ON3U3 3dld 30MIN80 HW 9 ONUSIX3 -- -r - eouro 83 --.�- .'- " SNDUVWYn USX3 HJlm !u 3dYf15 3Nn MOId N011 30VX35 1J Q340M38 3B Ol 3JN3G aVI151X3 � 1031Y1ad 3H! ,b - - _ _ - - - - oI3IG S833MW Od Jn01fJn0aH1 30Na35 N/11NAf1 l3'08 3d AU7un oNu51X3 �- .! »% k�-.. vt- N0UO3ap o13L3 S833N1JN3 N3d H! 1 Hl N1Y1NIIlY '31mIX0addY 311707 7/re 1008 ONUSIX3 HI38J =-- ' '^ t✓ur - -- a3 rJot7 3e of ore coa avuslx3 _ oN no7 3u a a3aNn - — `. NOlLJ38q OIIId Sa33N10N3 aid 311707 563)10 AB mron38 3B O1 I1/Jn Au711n ONu51X3 1J 3Hl 30 Ng1Y8n0 08YA N0UY8od810J W:l M063 (9MY180 T@& 1008 •... __�.. / - -- -. < N0038C 013!3 Sa33N7N3 aid 3YUJ 7M1 111d5 MGN HIM 63d 3dn5 ONY d330 Id f XOaddl •UOd ON3d330 '3JYId38 ONY 310038 -.91* Y 3JH3d MNn NIYH,7 `.AVUSIA3. 30Y80 JNUSIX3 fQlm XMe 3dO7S 7YX634-WN 0Nu9X3 - NOUYJ07 IMIX08ddY 34075 XM 1 f Z NOS913 3138JNOJ 03SOdX3 ONUSU3 F- .... ¢. . y , - . • _ 3d075 XM 1: f Igf '37✓1d M lJ3108d - IMA 17373 ONUSIX3 .., 133)5 335 - 3JYaip1 Soul Jd S 7 L i' �'�1 37YId M 1J3108d - a'A'M3015 313a0N00 aVU5U3 :9310N 3ON3213-4321 V. o sooa No0 """fZOo oaw B W"G 90/Zt/4 �j\lv9 do .�a -,1AIa 16{r a d3 sovK.ON e� pa/SS3lOdJ � 0 ap* a0 -miNmma131iaNd.ay,9N3SHNIIOHlandOCV p'1� m�a�rvisaai 3 (955i +a4���'++a(1'ILi3-Y•lIZ) RZ'91 ,m.p?,nP cjd boor 91-9I -51,q 0 _ Dm 0 �j\lv9 do .�a -,1AIa 16{r a d3 sovK.ON e� pa/SS3lOdJ � 0 ap* a0 -miNmma131iaNd.ay,9N3SHNIIOHlandOCV p'1� m�a�rvisaai 3 (955i +a4���'++a(1'ILi3-Y•lIZ) RZ'91 ,m.p?,nP cjd boor 91-9I -51,q 0 X �S1HS 10 83914114 1V1C1�{ ^ "83314ION3 3H1 AB 03AO8ddV 36WA83H10 SS3lNn'SSN of - 411 1 L}yJ HIVA 33NVO8033V NI SOWS 13AV80 A8 30V1d NI 013H (.133A ml ) a�Oi !0 3JY O14V 3NInOSIA HIIM 03dd01 "13AY80 O3HSVM NV310 11 AIO ./f, d0 N0U.N18W03 V 38 TIVHSIVIH31VW WVO A8V80d W31 7' '5-I ='^0'.SZ ='I VD3 H1LM SmE' 'DN 133H5 s ro30NVO8030V Ni 301A30 NOI1VdISS10 A110013A OVVoN �Zlvos OlHdVIB n 2 033tl1d383801ONWIN1S101ONDWVolDNI1SIX3 'ON NO(1rJiJiJ3d5 � % a 5000 NO3 ""fiZ00 NO113l1M1 3Mod ION y�BdWY�`��a�a�~ OAH3a1dDNusX3 61 I ors/00n I 90/u/e I a N 0 10.V m X O m m x w a Z m N -i O 0 ze. M 0.ELIg�1. At7N0 /►33y Nv7d ttOj O/M 3'&a BIOHNVW DNIISIX3 $1 -0L-3S 4)p, aweP,glx uI uo,g0alo,d )aryl 131Nl30VNItla0 ONI1SIX3 S383tl CS'O 3ONV88n1S10 d0 V3aV (9 L3 133HS 33S) NNW38 O1 Y3Nv d8n1 DNIISIX3 si NMOHS SV N80M 3H13NI8NOO Ol A8tlS53J3N d103Sn 38IIVHS DNIHOHS'NMOHS 33NYSan1SIO 3Nn AAOld X3383 AN"dW31 JO Y38V 3H101 XaOM 3HI 3NIdNO3 _nVHS CNV 33Sn 38 Ol _ SUOIS NOIlOn81SNOO 3H13NIWa3130 11VHS 8010rNINO3 3NIl MOld N338O DNIISIX3 )St 3H1 'S3d O1S NOI1VAYOX3 AdVMOdW31 VL 3WnSSV ONV A131VWIXOaddV NMOHS 3a1j SS33DV N0113n81SN03 ONY SNOILVOId103dS 33S'133fO8d3O01883nN3AVSM310ISS300V ® S3dOlS A8V80dY131® V38V XaOM NOI13n8LsNOJ 3H1 310N NOfI"O1S38 '31UDNOO ON108V038 SN011VOId103dS Q 33S'3Sn S801OV81N038Od 318V11VAY 101 ONIX8tld 1 HIM NItlW38013dld 40 SON3 N3d MS v3 dv 83M35 H3N1-S ll 03NOONVSV ONI 5%3 JO NO18 d3AOW38 0 M nNa130018O13VMIN03-dWnd ONIa31VM30 f# _ NOHdIS 83M3S H3N1-SL O3NOONVSV E)NI1SIX3 Sn NO 3a3V 1401 JnaOSN03 A8tl 310 3S 33VId NI 133108d NOIIVDIIIW 'S3dld OVS83M351311"Vd HONFSONVHON"e E>MISIX3 1O3i08d 803 ld33X3)O388n1SIONn NfVW3801V38V 103NION3 3H1 AS OBA08ddV Stl ONtl NOUon815NO3 OL -3S HUM NI N0110310Nd 131N1 NIV80 MdO1S 018018d Z-33 HIM 3ONVO8003V NI (VS3) 33N3d 1Va3d0 � NOI1JO81SOO 35NV80 3OVld- 33NVS8n1SX] 8011WI1 SV ONtl ZSN HUM 30NYO8000V N3NO 0N18310VM30 31VWIX08ddY NOlIV3Ol - SS300Y 40113na1SN00 113314ION33H1 AS 03AO8ddV SV ONV 8013"IN03 3H1 AS 03NIW83130 38 Ol NOlIV3Ol 13VX3 P 'WM HIM 30NYONODOV NI A11110Vd lnOHSVM 313aONO3 -SON33dld IHO13M 0113AV8D 03HSVM N 310 83A03 VS 13 9V7 TA'da NO A8tl!lOdW3W 11 1 HIM '03O33N z SY'N31d0380W 80 AIItlO 1d3M5 38 0133tld8nS 1N3W3AVd ONVOW38 N3HM IVIN31VR 03RIOA 11V d0 3SOdSIO ONV 3AOW38 'SOVB ONUS ONtl 03103108d 313 011N3WnNOW 8314803 A183108d DNIISIX3 N33111M ill. 30Vd 3NIl W838 N.M.M. A8V80d W31 eNn33H1301333 OZ NIHIIM SV ONV DNIAVd 311dXDOIS AaV80dW318d 319VIlVAV V38V ' 3VDNlISLX333Vld380NV3AOW380NV1N3W3AVd3V DNIISIX31n3MV5 'sHnD3138ON033Otl1d3NCNV3AOW38 � 3dOlS A8tl8Odrl31 '81101NO313A31 NO 3003 NOIIVAVJX3 3dld 3dOH ANV80dW31 WON1.5 NVH.L 380W UP A313 IV OVd XaOM 30yJ 1-4 OL X08ddV ON 031VO01 38 01 L -3S HIM 33NVO8ODOV NI 33N3d 1lIS DES A313 IV dS8 d0 301 -6310N 30N32134321 OR! ' �� j• _�"fes -__ Nf3H3H O31j103dS S3011OVHd lN3fY39VNM 1S38-40 SN0110l1N1SN130NVN31NfVW GW NOIlY77V1SNf 30 ONt1Sl7 3137dnOO V NO.i SNOISIAOdd 7V103dS 33S \1/` LV.1 .......... .. . V .' NOIl"J-S -0L-3S 4)p, aweP,glx uI uo,g0alo,d )aryl 1!,qc. fal'!d -� F1 IF• ,alauyac antes °l i - ,q pap. u r �rc c 71 — Ys— -.wan - v3 dv I.—Ir pa1.1.p 1p� \1/` LV.1 .......... .. . "OV 03 Wpn eouep,olae u! uoliaalo,d IapnO V .' NOIl"J-S -0L-3S 4)p, aweP,glx uI uo,g0alo,d )aryl 1!,qc. fal'!d -� F1 IF• ,alauyac antes °l i - ,q pap. u r q n As4 0381n038 ION SNM03S ON3 C38VIA 31ON - v3 dv I.—Ir pa1.1.p 1p� "OV 03 Wpn eouep,olae u! uoliaalo,d IapnO -0L-3S 4)p, aweP,glx uI uo,g0alo,d )aryl 'PWM Vu1 aluep,ogx u! A4!1!oe! Inoysel .1.1110 F1 - Z-33 dWS 4m aluep,o", m (B.—, uogonpsuol a6uen IM-) ulgelabal 6-0— -1 ... Id s6eq I.—B pa4sel ueap LRw papnA uoo aq IRgs sw,aq Beq mne,D 'G -SN dWS 4)!M ... P, ul uo!s,aryp lels1 ueap IR15u1 00000 ON3037 'Y -SN q u,n;w1 Ings 6ws n weaAs Ae,odwal '.did uwvanry 341 9n0wa„01Rlsul q'Aressaxu}i'palRlsus aq Ile4s 6ulsson weaAs ke,,dwal V S L ZSN dwe La! 4ouep,a>7euipau ;iadaglle4s'A,essa>aull'alre uoyn­za;o euua1wna0 ZL -!I,qw luawawld alanwq Aue fiuwnyld of oud penelsul a9 Ile4s s,Qgpme Ino4sel aI,nuo0 'L L smn­P n pie salerns v6 )p 6up— 6u,,n , wolsAs a6e,!e,p uuo)s Aue o] Nauru wpehivawpas anww!w q w os paumlumw aq IR4s al!s 141 '6upua; ll!s,0 syw rzgy'saleq legs Wes paBuu aq IR4s sal!dgwls yl,ea ye vlseas Awe, ayl6uunO 'OL '.I— paumluew eq IR4s s. q-1 A.0 S -B 10 IR4s do ueap aleipawwi, 'APado,d JIAn w.wfpe,l oggnd pies uodn pue n . M­­'yids'...I, Aue pino45 'awld lipnd ,aylo,o Aalle 'la>As oilgnd Aue nno aluelsgns snap,eze4 Rue sugap'auw 1-15 p, -e Wee Aue 6uyne4 uaµ u>,lel aq p 4s.,eo a lgeuos,,H '9 .1813 141 woq Ieno,dde lnoylyn pan , aq lou Ings sa,nseaw pAuOO uolsa,3 '(palwd ayl;o as,n11 ayi Buunp _!_P I04w1 -rs -4111 adeys 147 -8-411o'awld., 'pnfpe '.now of A,ess.— aq Aew ll) p.au {a4l saleuwtia umm iwro,d luanbasgns I lun uoge,ado u Ida,! pue mpe4uo0 o,g Aq paumluew aq of a,e Aa41 awld u a,e saluaP 104111 uOK112 aOuO 'C swge gy s p,epu s a41 Aq pwiM1 se Io,luoo lsnp apinwd IIe4s,o;wAu -j 'g I.— Isnp buy p a. p.!pw11 aq IR4s luawalege wggpd 6u waouo, wet R1ol pue ale1S paz q IL uopnllod A4) Pte u1Ro,a 1e41,awrew a lens u! lno pauel ag Kegs s 1 d o lxulsw3 'S 'a6ewep uogeWu pas pm ,a luana,d al A,ess»..,111,141 vaureq wld of Au,IgSuod ..-4w3 a41 si m 'uoll3misu"jo ase4d pue 1 w" a4, of Su'_ Are, IRn -q pAlo, l,w pes pue u,,so,, ,o; —4-o) pue paau 141 e 'IVS3) aow; A<,odwal 141 q,oualw ve leW se a,e A", 141 q'pal—I aq IR4s sa gi sdolwnuo3 a41 'subge,,dl ppy ,arpo Aue 6u,Me pun .1,oud pallelsw aq pa4s (VS3) »u.d Aendwa1141 '...Id a,p uownoq, uiw4 (VS3) eOM ang! s Alielwwuonnw Paysygelsa a4l;o apinm mow lleys e,o1 aN 'E '; L +aqo 0 of 4 AeW -4 m.A 1y;0 Powd A,p e, q Papwq aq 194S wea,11141 u, sa t nosy vnoy ZI 4ylvn pinelap; s_ u!e, ape,nseaw w41 pue fiuvnoy AN,g1e s 1u.µ1 weaAs ay1 u ,1111 IR4sXel ou'walsRs uoe:anip Aendwal ayl /O Rnowa, pue uogeyelsu ayl,q ldalx3•'Z sa,6oA u! s ,u01 a;µ1 .1-uo pe—u ew aglsn., prea6e�wd pq pa(o,d ayl u papin0,d ae palo,d s gl,q sllwad algea Nde 11 sa do3 -swgpu l,. ad p,eoe loA,00 /4(,nC),IlVM Ruwfi'B 141 Pue s u8ug p sdn3 Al V 'aweE)Pue 4sld;a lua dao IR of —qpe is— 4,11 liy L 631ON 7O211NO3 NOISON3 - -- ----- -_ _ 913 ON 1331S © u ON NO11YO13103dE e8'IV�S JIHdVH0 c So00 NOo "'£Z00 'N011tl3Ot / 'ON 3113 94 3 ors/oaw na Nmtlao so/Z(/a y7 n C m m m M -i O 0 X o m z m M x W o x M M m U) O � z C M 0 z ,�o ago 00�,d` oil,v3 do -IIn10 l�r� `y0 * Coati '&3 1 SOVCE ON 2 j n n a �bN�/ssaioba�� YV03Al71SY07 1/1N7VM :IMl3®17V7B - BOOR! HKWS3O3d 3L/11/13 UV3N SON3J t3W NOLLYJI11WW3W3-WVHN3 NW&Vdld 7MOW (INV M3M07dA3NN0W '30NYY107100W 'W7Y9 33B'30YS 'OV717 YINM03I717 '033MN71W 'SINYMMIYJ' NOIIV3MD 1Y11SVHOMIB ONb'F91 A1dM31ffIB Fz-1 AMM36M3073ONV!ON7VM 3W 3,V71SVOO-NOIIYHO1S38ONV7000M)W O (InNMM)VO 3N71SV00'3381 AVG 'OOB'03M'AHN3BN3073'NOA011 S33M1 ONY3SOMHS NY/MVd/M 3Sd3A/0-NDI1Y1353A3d3d07583dd0 -a SOOOM NO!1000NVMO77IM - NOLLVI303A3M 36075 ROOM 30MV7 'S3HSOd ONV'G-OW3S'1Y3370W 'MOTRN-NOIlt2'O1S3M73NNYND FC j O 'COOMNO1LODONV'38OWVJAS'AMd38)IDV79'MO71IM-Ng1tlMO1S386YH73AVdD Ull Sd38V y REGIS, o ^Py Hai' a o H '� n33NIOH�' 3 9, I 1 � L ; 1 " ii� c { a 132 1 > i _,•139 i. T\\ vi f40 � TS - I sidewalk ��^^�sL�, 1 parking lot & i I .;��rrr"""""'i,r I 136 COORDINATE DATA: CONTROL POINTS Alit KKKNTS Pt. North('t) EasttXl Etev(7) Description 1015000.00 5000.00 860.36 SETRBCAP tO45201.A6 4636.68 856.90 fINOPEN - 105 5105.53 4812.49 855.79 PINIINIP _ 106 4924.83 4797.62 855.38 PECOT 107 5030.25 4872.28 848.26 FEW 110 .5031.07 5012.11 956.59 [PCP.4 111 1975.80 4981.95 856.75 IPPE3923 1.25CO3.80 5061.97 859.05 REBARdCAP 111 019.09 5CA4.16 658.38 BBCT 122 5038.21 4878.76 848.44 TECT 1235085.23 4929.02 848.16 PECT 124 5046.50 4969.61 838.16 FOCT 125 5033.02 AS40.21 840.48 RBCT 121 4896.23 4953.33 656.84 IPOFEN 128 4874.32 4966.47 857.18 PK6'AASER 1324921.19 41-,5.98 154.77 WT -_- 131 4696.56 4607.82 653.53 88CT 1364579.52 475a.ot 858.64 PNGIASNEA 139 1507.6A 466'.46 860.61 IPOPEN -- 140 4519.63 4692.99 659.37 FZLS5571 141 4747.16 4855.94 856.30 IFFFS923 146 4810.32 4856.66 813.07 P.BCT 147 A848.98 A872.40 839.A2 MCT WT - retar, plastic cap i tack. markeq 'CONTROL POINT' bowline alley building \Acle-- wki2' .ALa FfiTu+f iE6ET0 GOut"c'e eave of cane. looting Delo. Stdewelk C; too of eroded SlOpa 0116. SJOIWI-t C4' die. IeWoxl caisson Delos DuilOing C610 a5.001` C51i J.0 nigh railirq along sidewalk C6. o nigh chain link fence General lopographic Surrey Was - I. Abrizontal datmm for this alp is local grad. WJzontal units are feet. the local Origin JS point 101. Daring grid cOcrOtnates as Jf�Own. 2. "'. basis of bearings is the record Doering oeUeen point 104 and 105. being math 9173' rest per record mac 4 d 67A. 3. The vertical de,- for this surrey Js Al41 .. 7be pr jIll benchmerk is point 101. Ina project "ncnmerk eleveeion is 860. 6" as de!erained Al differential !awls fro,'C 1450' iP10 fv16691. RAVCaB elerotian of BSC 3S feet. - - -- ----- )Ae proiett OMehmarA' descripttdn is' set 5/8 repos en0 plastic cap merke0 'Cwrl", PoIM: 15.0' north of the northwester!, end Of Cu'r0. SOWLnweS!Mly ACe of (aptatrdn'0 Averme Ertension. I- Boundary and easement data SAW Ye tied to field measured positions of found minuments. FS. Limits of creek ire water surface IS Of data 01 photography mr field save,. Pwk betlms hat surveyed. Areas w enwt cwtaas Oemtes Obscured ground oO pAotography. H l _�r"'�- bbrbullding ey - `�� 1 1 (n / parsing lot I I 1128 1 c•5. / 0 fa01NE"e •r N c J IS � •-S� M SWl,Vra7'ssltrEA�6Rl Isis sap was prepared by me and is a compilation of aerial megaing and a conventional field surrey LEGEND fir ` f REESE at the request 0! Wallace S^qup. bbrreys. Inc.. Eros dated - U -7- -4115 Broad Street Aerial sapping vas performed by Gojoen state Aerial photography for field to end febrvary, 2005. lot, boundary fines Suite 5-5 San LU(5 Obispo, GA 95401 P d. fe0ruary 3 7705. control photography was surveyed .Bnuiry Conventional field wrvey Witnin delineated areas vas perfarmed by me in April. 7705. 10 I � •. wt i,-• I I f O leis mea delineates the horizontal and vertical locations of risible feataes, natural and men- - -50nde. contours I 1 1 _�r"'�- bbrbullding ey - `�� 1 1 (n / parsing lot I I 1128 1 c•5. / 0 fa01NE"e •r N c J IS � •-S� M SWl,Vra7'ssltrEA�6Rl Isis sap was prepared by me and is a compilation of aerial megaing and a conventional field surrey LEGEND fir W REESE at the request 0! Wallace S^qup. bbrreys. Inc.. Eros dated - U -4115 Broad Street Aerial sapping vas performed by Gojoen state Aerial photography for field to end febrvary, 2005. lot, boundary fines Suite 5-5 San LU(5 Obispo, GA 95401 P d. fe0ruary 3 7705. control photography was surveyed .Bnuiry Conventional field wrvey Witnin delineated areas vas perfarmed by me in April. 7705. -- center lines O CA 3405 Son LL� O51a80 .5 93405 - - 805.547.5375 O leis mea delineates the horizontal and vertical locations of risible feataes, natural and men- - -50nde. contours meoe, within the areas shown for the purpose of site planning and engineering Design. All Warranty '-- _--• feature W - as to the size, type and location of non-visible featow. natural and man cede, that say exist. is _ _ expressed or implied. Utility agencies should be contacted prior to any excavation. TT- top of bank lnis map meets the ABfional Nap Accuracy Standards. Digital for.. (nese data say nave been delivered as a courtesy to the Client or other third parties in D eonveno.nol O 20 40 top. Dmlt c°ntro nterv°I = I loot Q Lelirery 01 the electronic file does not constitute the delivery o! Dur professional services. Me most recent signed and sealed paper print represents tAe Delivery a/professional services and * found m.numents .number must be, referred to for correct infarmatirn. /d:"ESE Mater i Land Surveying Services (RkL55) fAall not be responsible for' ao0i ficalions to, br prodArts derived fro4 the electronic files Mich are not - A set control point (./number) approved. Signed art" sealed by i cop c tncontralled ar unauthorized use Dy any 1n01vr"ual or entity for any purposes Wnatsoerer Snell notld ppool lnc4r Ilabl y M the part of RALSS. - m.nz: - �� - - eT4.19.05 O tree _- _ a oATE: ROOert J. Re SC ALS6208 date _ _ -.. --_ _ 3-16-06 - r LAND a TOPOGRAPHY oRAwN el: MDo - a 1A9 ATASCADERO CREEK C EC<DENO, 6Y: ATASCADERO, CA - -'--- -- - ---- - ER`J�' Lsam - - - _..-__-- _- .. _ .. FILE N0. / LOGTICN: 0023 CON D S - wawa OC ` rc ne name _ sPEcr. canoN No. - - osmr.c` P1O ----- - ' h<cked 6y: rjr SI'E[T No. ,- O�.t date 03.19.2005 19t1eei I Oi 1 CIT.- TOTAL-_ NUMBER 09 SHTS: X title Tient REESE Celt TOPOGRAPHY Wallace Groupp Water " -4115 Broad Street & Land project Atasatdcro Greak id4 id'06k3 1 t7V8rtletlls _ ..._ - - Suite 5-5 San LU(5 Obispo, GA 95401 P SURVEYING SERVICES - 7970 Pp. ' - Atmcader ,CA - - 805.544.4011 CA 3405 Son LL� O51a80 .5 93405 - - 805.547.5375 - wawa OC ` rc ne name _ sPEcr. canoN No. - - osmr.c` P1O ----- - ' h<cked 6y: rjr SI'E[T No. ,- O�.t date 03.19.2005 19t1eei I Oi 1 CIT.- TOTAL-_ NUMBER 09 SHTS: X ALLOWABLE TREE IMPACTS LEGEND A 12 -INCH L.O. GWffX WUHW K D9ftW ALLOWED AS SHOW. 0W EXOSTM TREE TO REMAIN, PROTECT FROM AFACTS TRIMMING CO SIRWHES LESS THEN 4-IMOYES ALLOWED UNDER NE 0* VOSIM W TO REMAIN. T DIRECTION F Pf PRWECr ARBORIST i i6h 20 It. WITH &PACTS DESCRIBED SHEET No. X, EXISTING TREE TO BE REM0,1ED B wq wYLLOw c—m -0 ma- ALLOWED As sNow A EXVTX TREE TO REMAIN - VOMFICATION MO TRIMOPW ALLOWED UNDER M DIWC770M OF THE PROJECT ARBORIST. EXACT LOrADDm PENDIAC PROTECT THE ROOT SYSTEM C EXISTING WILLOW AND WkNJTS TEMPORARY nwic *PHYY THE DRIPLNE -Z� . . ..... . ........ :7 ALLOWED RLL SNALL BE PLACED LOOSELY AND WAVY E01ARMENr DWI NOT CWFACT TRUNKS NOR BE ALLOWED TO COUFXF Sat WITHIN 5 FEET ... ...... . . . .. - OF A TRUW TRIMMING ALLOWED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF TK PROTECT .... ... -------- ARBOFdST SOIL TO BE RESTORED TO EXISM nASq GRADS'. �X' > N— DEN Oast OBH W. A H"". Width s -,f, ;Z Mt� --T-11 -- 100 Walnut 2 a 10 10 15 D -'.I. III Ud, 1101-1 - Y4!!!Utm I.....1- UZ 12 it__.... - . ........35 25 B Masfs;deytldR- 102 Walnut 1 10 35 10 C -Mwdedbdg 103 Walnut 1 12.5 35 20 8 Stump Walnut 1 6 5 1 D tl— 11.3 SIT 2 Walnut -.-I ........... a .. ..... . . ..... ............. . . .... 5 .............. STP 3 Walnut,,._. 1 .. 6 5 1 - - .. . ..... D 1mhI`M,aI.3 Live 139 Oak35 _14_13 _11_ 30 ?o ........... . . ........... . .... ....... v . . ....... . ..... .. . ... p nu: No. LOCATION: 0023.... CON DOCS ..... . ...... NO. . ...... ... T i i6h 20 It. SHEET No. C1.8 TOTAL NUMBER OF $HTS: X . ...... . . % -Z� . . ..... . ........ :7 . . .. ....... ... ...... . . . .. - .... ... -------- �X' > a - ;Z y A % 0 .... . ....... b > 70- a J a -n ..... . .... . x .. .... .. —... . ........ o a- 7� E • LL W 0 < 4/12/06 DRAWN BY: MDO/SJC GRAPHIC SCALE p nu: No. LOCATION: 0023.... CON DOCS NO. IN FEET i i6h 20 It. SHEET No. C1.8 TOTAL NUMBER OF $HTS: X . ...... . . -Z� . . .. ....... ... ...... . . . .. - .... ... -------- > a - ;Z y A % 0 E • LL W 0 < 4/12/06 DRAWN BY: MDO/SJC GRAPHIC SCALE p nu: No. LOCATION: 0023.... CON DOCS NO. IN FEET i i6h 20 It. SHEET No. C1.8 TOTAL NUMBER OF $HTS: X ITEM NUMBER: RA B-3 DATE: 05/23/06 Community Redevelopment Agency of Atascadero Staff Report - Executive Director Determination for Low/Moderate Income Housing Fund RECOMMENDATION: Board adopt the Draft Resolution determining that the planning and administrative expenses funded from the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund were necessary for the production, improvement, and/or preservation of affordable housing for low and moderate income households. DISCUSSION: Background: Pursuant to Section 33334.3(d) of the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health and Safety Code Section 33000 et seq.), when planning and administrative expenditures are made from the Low/Moderate Income Housing Fund, the Agency is required to prepare a written determination showing that planning and administrative expenditures were necessary for the production, improvement, or preservation of low- and moderate -income housing. The determination must be made annually in writing. This requirement has been inadvertently overlooked the past several years, so more than one year is being presented tonight. The expenditures made and budgeted have been/are for the Housing Trust Fund and a small portion of the staff's time. Staff recommends that the Agency Board adopt the Draft Resolution as presented. ATTACHMENT: 1. Draft Resolution DRAFT RESOLUTION ,,.� A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO DETERMINING THAT THE PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATION EXPENSES FUNDED IN FISCAL YEARS 2003/200412004/2005, 2005/2006, AND 2006/2007 BY THE LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSING FUND WERE NECESSARY FOR THE PRODUCTION, IMPROVEMENT, AND/OR PRESERVATION OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSEHOLDS WHEREAS, on July 13, 1999, the City Council of the City of Atascadero adopted the redevelopment plan for the Community Redevelopment Agency Project Area; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 33334.2(a) of the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health and Safety Code Section 33000 et seq.) not less than 20% of all taxes which are allocated to the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Atascadero (Agency) shall be set aside by the Agency in a Low and Moderate Income Housing fund and used by the Agency for the purpose of increasing, improving and preserving the community's supply of low and moderate income housing available at affordable housing costs to people and families of low and moderate income; and n WHEREAS, Pursuant to Section 33334.3(d) of the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health and Safety Code Section 33000 et seq.) it is the intent of the California State Legislature that the amount of money spent for planning and general administration from the Low and Moderate Income Housing fund not be disproportionate to the amount actually spent for the cost of production. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Community Redevelopment Agency hereby determines: 1. That it was necessary to allocate $4,283 of the $270,558 Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund budget for planning and administrative expenses necessary for the production, improvement, and/or preservation of low and moderate income housing during the 2003/2004 fiscal year. 2. That it was necessary to allocate $9,490 of the $434,920 Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund budget for planning and administrative expenses necessary for the production, improvement, and/or preservation of low and moderate income housing during the 2004/2005 fiscal year. 3. That it was necessary to allocate $10,150 of the $450,790 Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund budget for planning and administrative expenses necessary for the production, improvement, and/or preservation of low and moderate income housing during the 2005/2006 fiscal year. v W 4. That it was necessary to allocate $10,580 of the $476,910 Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund budget for planning and administrative expenses necessary for the production, improvement, and/or preservation of low and moderate income housing during the 2006/2007 fiscal year. On motion by Board Member Board Member hereby adopted following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: ADOPTED: —, 2006 ATTEST: in Marcia McClure Torgerson, Agency Secretary 2 and seconded by the foregoing Resolution is CITY OF ATASCADERO Jerry Clay, Chairperson APPROVED AS TO FORM: Patrick Enright, General Counsel