Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 2002-041 RESOLUTION NO. 2002-041 A RESOLUTION OF THE ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL CERTIFYING NEGATIVE DECLARATION 2002-0030 PREPARED FOR ZONE CHANGE 2001-0029, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2001-0067, AND VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2001-0014 (2000 Ferrocarril / Gearhart) WHEREAS, an application has been received from Kelly Gearhart, 6205 Alcantara Avenue, Atascadero, CA 93422, (Applicant & Owner), to consider a project consisting of a Planned Development overlay zone change to PD-16 with the adoption of a Master Plan of Development, and an sixteen-lot cluster residential tract map, on a 31+/- acre lot located at 2000 Ferrocarril Road(APN 049-023-030, 049-291-016, 049-291-005); and, WHEREAS, an Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration 2002-0030 were prepared for the project and made available for public review in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA); and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero held a public hearing following the close of the review period for the Initial Study and Draft Negative Declaration to consider its adequacy; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, at a public hearing held on Tuesday, September 17, 2002, recommended that the City Council certify Mitigated Negative Declaration 2002-0030, NOW, THEREFORE, the Atascadero City Council, at a public hearing held on Tuesday, October 8, 2002, hereby resolves to certify Mitigated Negative Declaration 2002-0030 based on the following Findings as shown on Exhibit A: 1. The Negative Declaration has been completed in compliance with CEQA; and, 2. The Mitigated Negative Declaration was presented to the Planning Commission, and the information contained therein was considered by the Planning Commission, prior to recommending action on the project for which it was prepared; and, 3. The project does not have the potential to create a significant environmental impact; and, 4. The Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration will be forwarded to the City Council, and the information therein contained will be considered by the City Council, prior to taking final action on the project. On motion by Council Member Johnson and seconded by Council Member Scalise, the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted following roll call vote: AYES: Council Members Clay, Johnson, Scalise and Mayor Arrambide NOES: Council Member Luna ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None ADOPTED: October 8, 2002 B Y• Michael Arrambide, Mayor Attest: Marcia McClure Torgerson, CityC rk l. Approved as to form: Roy anley, City Attor y Exhibit : A Resolution 2002-041 RECEIVED JUL262002 cop JULIE L.ROOEWALO atoll ■ ■ cow/Clerk 19;$ 2 e �" o--p— CITY OF ATASCADERO � - �'° � PROPOSED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION #2002-0030 6500 Palma Avenue Atascadero,CA 93422 805/461-5035 Applicant: Kelly Gearhart, 6205 Alacantara,Atascadero, CA 93422 Project Title: ZCH 2002-0029/CUP 2002-0067/Vesting TTM 2002-0014 Project 2000 Ferrocarril Road(East of Union Pacific Railroad),Atascadero, San Luis Location: Obispo County APN 049-023-030, 049-291-016, 049-291-005 Project The proposed project consists of Planned Development Zone Change with a Master Plan of Development Description: to allow a 16 lot single family residential subdivision with an average minimum lot size of 2.5 acres. One of the lots will be a 5.76-acre open space lot with an equestrian/pedestrian trail and parking area. The project will permit the construction of 13 additional single family dwellings. The site has rolling topography and large flat areas with numerous oak trees and native vegetation. The site is located between the Salinas River and the Union Pacific Railroad. Access will be provided from a street extension off of El Camino Real that will require construction of a grade separated railroad crossing. No water or sewer services are available to the site,and the site will be served by individual wells and septic systems. The project is consistent with the General Plan Land Use designation and requires a Planned Development Overlay for zoning consistency: General Plan Designation:SE(Suburban estates) Zoning District:RS(Residential Suburban Findings: 1. The project does not have the potential to degrade the environment. 2. The project will not achieve short-term to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals. 3. The project does not have impacts which are individually limited,but cumulatively considerable. 4. The project will not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings either directly or indirectly. Determination: Based on the above findings,and the information contained in the initial study 2002-0030(made a part hereof by. reference and on file in the Community Development Department),it has been determined that the above project will not have an adverse impact on the environment when the following proposed mitigation measures are incorporated into the project(see attachment). Prepared By: Warren Frace Date Posted: July 26,2002 Public Review Ends: August 16,2002 Attachments: 1. Mitigation Measures 2. Location Map 3. Site Plan/Tentative Tract Map Fac YCH 2002-M9.IS-MNV.7-25.02. Edx Print Wte:07!26102"7 AM 6500 PALMA AVENUE ATASCADERO,CALIFORNIA 93422 9 (805)461-5035 FAX 461-5036 lots :d �, 1979 CAD CITY OF ATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM Applicant: Kelly Gearhart, 6205 Alacarttara,Atascadero, CA 93422 Project Title: ZCH 2002-0029/CUP 2002-0067/Vesting TTM 2002-0014 Project 2000 Ferrocarril Road(East of Union Pacific Railroad),Atascadero, San Luis Location: Obispo County APN 049-023-030,049-291-016,049-291-005 Project The proposed project consists of Planned Development Zone Change with a Master Plan of Development Description: to allow a 16 lot single family residential subdivision with an average minimum lot size of 2.5 acres. One of the 1pts will be a 5.76-acre open space lot with an equestrian/pedestrian trail and parking area. The project will permit the construction of 13 additional single family dwellings. The site has rolling topography and large flat areas with numerous oak trees and native vegetation. The site is located between the Salinas River and the Union Pacific Railroad. Access will be provided from a street extension off of El Camino Real that will require construction of a grade separated railroad crossing. No water or sewer services are available to the site,and the site will be served by individual wells and septic systems. The project is consistent with the General Plan Land Use designation and requires a Planned Development Overlay for zoning consistency. General Plan Designation:SE(Suburban Estates) Zoning District:RS Residential Suburban Lead Agency Name City of Atascadero and Address: 6500 Palma Avenue Atascadero, CA 93422 Contact Person and Warren Frace Phone Number: City of Atascadero 6500 Palma Avenue,Room 104 Atascadero,CA 93422 General Plan Residential Suburban Estates (SE) 2.5-10 acre minimum lot size. Designation: Zoning: Residential Suburban(RS)2.5-10 acre minimum lot size. Surrounding Land North: Home Depot Commercial Center PD-9 Uses and Setting: South: Large lot Rural Residential West: Union Pacific Railroad East: Salinas River/Atascadero Mutual Water Company property Other public None. agencies whose approval is required (e.g.,permits,financing approval,or participation agreement) 07/26/02 ZCH 2002-0029.IS-MND.7-25-02.wrrf.doc CITY OF ATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY 11.a.3. Installed landscaped berms around outdoor living areas that have direct line-of-sight with the railway. . 11.a.4. Construct all housing will stucco siding and concrete or tile roofing materials to reduce interior noise. 11.a.5. Minimize windows that have direct line of sight with railway. 07/26/02 ZCH 2002-0029.IS-MND.7-25-02.wmf.doc r gg NO- MWARN 1, J MINEAw R: M MINE EN N EEEEEEtEEEtrE REED ., ��y,�r•�_���If� � ;;.. - occ�oaao�oocA�aooac .� ; . � • ,, fir , �i ' r,� CITY OF ATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except"No Impact"answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a Lead Agency cites following each question. A"No Impact"answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved(e.g.the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A"No Impact"answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards(e.g.the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants,based on a project-specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved,including off-site as well as on-site,cumulative as well as project-level,indirect as well as direct,and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) "Potentially Significant Impact"is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. If there are one or more"Potentially Significant Impact"entries when the determination is made,an EIR is required. 4) "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated"applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from"Potentially Significant Impact"to a"Less than Significant Impact." The Lead Agency must describe the mitigation measures,and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level(mitigation measures from Section XVII,"Earlier Analyses,"may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier analyses may be used where,pursuant to the tiering,program EIR,or other CEQA process,an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). Earlier analyses are discussed in Section XVII at the end of the checklist: 6) Lead Agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references information sources for potential impacts(e.g.general plans,zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should,where appropriate,include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. A source list should be attached. Other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 07126/02 ZCH 2002-0029.S-MND.7-25-02.wmT.doc " CITY OFATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY Initial Study 2002-0030 Potentially Less Than Less Than No significant Significantwith Significant Impact Zone Change 2002-0029 Impact Mitigation Impact Conditional Use Permit 2002-0067 Incorporation Tentative Tract Map 2002-0014 2000 Ferrocarril Road 1.AESTHETICS--Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? El ® R b)Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to,trees, rock outcroppings, and historic El buildings within a state scenic highway? c)Substantially degrade the existing visual character ❑ R M El -or quality of the site and its surroundings? d)Create a new source of substantial light or glare that would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? SOURCES: Project Description, site plan, site visit DISCUSSION: 1a,/b./c.The site does not meet the criteria for being a scenic vista,however it is a large natural area that is partially visible from public streets. The project will involve large residential lots with 2.5 acre minimum and the houses will be subject to design guidelines. Site improvements will be limited to a single rural character street that will require the removal on one native tree. The project will be consistent with the character of surrounding development. This impact is considered less than significant. 1.d. Consistent with City policy street lighting will not be required on the street to minimize light and glare impacts. Lighting will be limited decorative exterior residential lighting which is not a source of significant light and glare impacts. This impact is considered less than significant. 2.AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES: In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland.Would the project: a)Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or El El Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland),as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency,to non-agricultural use? b)Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Q Williamson Act contract? c) Involve other changes in the existing environment F] 171 which, due to their location or nature, could result in 07/26/02 Page ZCH 2002.0029.1$-MND.7-25.02.wmf.doc al ' CITY OF ATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY Initial Study 2002-0030 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant with Significant Impact Zone Change 2002-0029 Impact Mitigation Impact Conditional Use Permit 2002-0067 Incorporation Tentative Tract Map 2002-0014 2000 Ferrocarril Road control of fugitive dust(PM-10)as contained in section 6.4 of the Air Quality Handbook. All site grading and demolition plans notes shall list the following regulations: A. All material excavated or graded shall be sufficiently watered to prevent excessive amounts of dust. Watering shall occur at least twice daily with complete coverage, preferably in the late morning and after work is finished for the day. B. All clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation activities shall cease during periods of high winds (i.e.greater than 20 mph averaged over one hour)so as to prevent excessive amounts of dust. C. All material transported off-site shall be either sufficiently watered or securely covered to prevent excessive amounts of dust. D. The area disturbed by clearing,grading,earth moving,or excavation operations shall be minimized so as to prevent excessive amounts of dust. E. Permanent dust control measured identified in the approved project revegetation and landscape plans shall be implemented as soon as possible following completion of any soil disturbing activities. F: Exposed ground areas that are planned to be reworked at dates greater than one month after initial grading shall be sown with fast-germinating native grass seed and watered until vegetation becomes established. G. All disturbed areas not subject to revegetation shall be stabilized using approved chemical soil binders,jute netting,or other methods in advance by the APCD. H. All roadways,driveways,sidewalks,etc.to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible. In addition,structural foundations shall be completed as soon as possible following building pad construction. L On-site vehicle speed shall be limited to 15 mph for any unpaved surface. J. All unpaved areas with vehicle traffic shall be watered at least twice per day, using non-potable water. K. Streets adjacent to the project site shall be swept daily to remove silt which may have accumulated from construction activities so as to prevent excessive amounts of dust from leaving the site. M. Wheel washers may be required when significant offsite import or export of fill is involved. 3c. The project will result in a net increase of 13 single family residences with a net increase of 130 vehicle trips per day. This impact is considered.less than significant with the following mitigation measures. MITIGATION MEASURES 3.c.1. A multi-use Class I bicycle,pedestrian and equestrian trail will be provided from Chico Road to the Salinas River and along the shoulder of the new proposed street. 3.c.2. Large canopy shade trees shall be provided along street frontages to minimize urban heat build-up. 0726102 Page 3 ZCH 2002-0029.IS-MND.7-25-02.wmf dx CITY OF ATASCADERO ' INITIAL STUDY Initial Study 2002-0030 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant with Significant Impact Zone Change 2002-0029 Impact Mitigation Impact Conditional Use Permit 2002-0067 Incorporation Tentative Tract Map 2002-0014 2000 Ferrocarril Road found no kit fox habitat features. The report concludes that development of the site will have no impact on the kit fox or its habitat. This impact is considered to be less than significant. 4c. Although the site a adjacent to the Salinas River it is located on a raised plain that is above the flood plains. The site was used historically as a quarry and has been significantly altered form its original condition. There are no streams, drainage courses or wetlands that exist within the project area. This is considered a non-impact. 4d. Based on the conclusion of the biological survey development of the site will not impact wildlife movements or migratory corridors. 4e. There are 331 native oak trees on the project site. Of those trees 15 native Live Oak trees on the site that will be impacted by the development of the project. Of the impacted trees, only one needs to be removed and the impacts to the remaining 14 trees can be mitigated and preserved. This impact is considered less than significant with mitigation. MITIGATION MEASURES 4.e.1. All construction within the drip lines of native trees shall be consistent with the mitigation requirements of the 5/13/02 arborist report. 4.e.2. A tree fencing protection plan shall be submitted with'construction plans and installed prior to permit issuance. 4.e.3. All tree removals shall be mitigated consistent with the requirements of the Atascadero Native Tree Ordinance. 4.e.4. An arborist shall be retained monitor construction,',mitigations,and overall tree health. 4f. There are no adopted conservation plans within the project vicinity. This is considered a non- impact. 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES --Would the project: a)Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in '15064.5? b)Cause a substantial adverse change in the ® a significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to '15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological F resource or site or unique geologic feature? d)Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? El El El V\J SOURCES: Phase 1 Archaeological Assessment CA Signer&Associates 11/27/01, Project description, site visit, Land Use Element EIR DISCUSSION: 5a-d. The project site was used a quarry by the railroads at the late 19th century and again in the 1930's. Consequently any archaeological resources that may have existed on the site have been 07/26102 Page 5 ZCN 2002-0029.IS•MND.7.25-02.wmF.doc A � CITY OFATASCADERO w INITIAL STUDY Initial Study 2002-0030 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant with Significant Impact Zone Change 2002-0029 Impact Mitigation Impact Conditional Use Permit 2002-0067 Incorporation Tentative Tract Map 2002-0014 2000 Ferrocarril Road The risk of liquifaction on the site has been determined to be low based on soil density. This impact is considered to be less than significant. 6b. The site is relatively flat with limited grading required. The risk of erosion is low. This impact is considered less than significant. 6c. The soils have been found to be suitable for construction. This impact is less than significant. 6d. The soil expansion index is very low to low. No impact. 6e. The project will be served by on site septic systems. Three percolation boring test were conducted on each lot. Percolation rates range from 5 to 30 minutes per inch which are considered very good for septic systems. This impact is considered to be less than significant. 7. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS -- Would the project: a)Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b)Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances,or waste El V\J within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d)Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to VN Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan area or,where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people living or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people living or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency .evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including 07/26/02 Page 7 ZCH 2002.0029.IS-MND.7-25-02.wmf.dx rh .�� CITY OF ATASCADEIZO INITIAL STUDY Initial Study 2002-0030 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant with Significant Impact Zone Change 2002-0029 Impact Mitigation Impact Conditional Use Permit 2002-0067 Incorporation Tentative Tract Map 2002-0014 2000 Ferrocarril Road exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional El sources of polluted runoff? f)Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? E El g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h)Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures that would impede or redirect flood flows? I) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or.mudflow? - K [d< Y,«�f�}lD��.my+�t,�jt:a�w ➢remqq na LL..ar+. �gy�. r' ^;..as.,.a,.n 7a...va........,::�. .. �1GI*J Jul RPa. N•e . a J aulen p• .w Site outside 1olr.tr o.-.r WY 1Mer' r1"MiY�r�'YM Mw;:w•Y l of flood . M'M.,rYw.•r Gww M:Vwa G.•rr.M +G la.•V.«•«.. plain MEG rY< y, �LVr•M�l» ' � n� Jc 4^r«,1Msw.rw ,4y«;y f.Nwwr fx.Or Iw 'w W f.M 0 w rccecyrw r . • . sr � .G w w�r�'wo:: a .Y � '2y".'. sr y'�•r r � o �w..earY• °•< �,>;�, �' "9`o- .� � ". � `�,a.,a Wvr 615cDxa.271+0¢W1 Glec{I0.7lStllnaiq...c 77.amFaiip `, 07126/02 Page 9 ZCH 2002.0029.IS-MND.7-25-02.wmf.doc CITY OFATASCADERO s INITIAL STUDY Initial Study 2002-0030 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant with Significant Impact Zone Change 2002-0029 Impact Mitigation Impact Conditional Use Permit 2002-0067 Incorporation Tentative Tract Map 2002-0014 2000 Ferrocarril Road or any known habitat conservation plan for this area. 10. MINERAL RESOURCES --Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral El n ® n resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important 1771 mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? SOURCES: Project description DISCUSSION: 10a-b. The site is the former location of a gravel quarry that was abandoned 70 years ago. Due to its small size, limited access and proximity to residential neighborhoods, the site is not considered an ideal site for mining operations. This impact is considered less than signficant. 11. NOISE--Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance,.or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ground-borne vibration or ground-borne noise levels? c)A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d)A substantial temporary or periodic,increase in El El ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan 0 0 El M or,where such a plan has not been adopted,within two miles of a public airport or public use airport,would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people living or working in El El 1:1 VNJ the project area to excessive noise levels? SOURCES: Noise Mitigation Analysis and Recommendation: Dohn Associates Acoustical Consulting 07/26/02 Page 11 ZCH 2002-0029.IS-MND.7.25-02.wmf.doc CITY OF ATASCADERO s INITIAL STUDY Initial Study 2002-0030 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant with Significant Impact Zone Change 2002-0029 Impact Mitigation Impact Conditional Use Permit 2002-0067 Incorporation Tentative Tract Map 2002-0014 2000 Ferrocarril Road elsewhere? SOURCES: Project description, City of Atascadero Land Use Element EIR DISCUSSION: 12a-c: The project will provide additional housing. These impacts are considered benefical. XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES a)Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? ❑ ® ❑ Police protection? El n ® ❑ Schools? ® F] Parks? El ® ❑ Other public facilities? FJ El n FX3 SOURCES: Project description, Land Use Element EIR DISCUSSION: 13a-d. The addition of a 13 new dwellings at this location will not significantly alter the need for any public services beyond what is anticipated in the approved Land Use Element EIR. This impact is considered to be less than significant. 14. RECREATION -- a)Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b)Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational EJ MA El facilities that might have an adverse physical effect on 07/26/02 Page 13 ZCH2002-oozs.Is-MND.7-2s-o2.wr„r.d« ERB . aw CFFYOFATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY Initial Study 2002-0030 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant with Significant Impact Zone Change 2002-0029 Impact Mitigation Impact Conditional Use Permit 2002-0067 Incorporation Tentative Tract Map 2002-0014 2000 Ferrocarril Road crossing at EI Camino Real that has been approved under a separate project. The project will generate approximately 130 daily trips which will not significantly impact a collector street. This impact is considered less than significant. 15b. The 130 daily trips will not exceed any standards. No impact. 15c. No impact 15d. There are no increased circulation hazards associated with the project. No impact. 15e. The project will provide a new emergency access connection between EI Camino Real and Ferrocarril Avenue. This is considered a beneficial impact. 15f. No special parking requirements. 15g. Project proposes bikeways consistent the General Plan. Beneficial impact. 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS--Would the project: a)Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? El n El M b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing El n facilities,the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing El El facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d)Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources,or El 0 are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider that serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in.addition to the provider's existing commitments? f)Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g)Comply with federal,state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? SOURCES: Project description, site plans. DISCUSSION: 16a. The project will be served by on site septic systems. No impact. 07/26/02 Page 15 ZCH 2002-0029.IS-MND.7-25-02.wmF.doc CITY OFATASCADERO MTIAL STUDY Tentative tract map Written project description Preliminary grading plan Master Plan of Development 11. 2025 General Plan EIR Crawford, Multari, &Starr, certified 2002 5. CEQA Handbook,Air Quality Control District,August 1995 6. Acoustical Design Manual, Brown-Buntin Associates, 1991 7. Noise Ordinance, City of Atascadero, 1992 8. Flood Insurance Rafe Map, community-panel number 060700 0004 B, Federal Emergency Management Agency,January 20, 1982 9. Trip Generation, Institute of Traffic Engineers 10. State Water Resources Quality Control Board, Basin Plan 07126/02 Page 17 ZCH 2002.0029.IS-MND.7-25-02.wrtddoc