HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 01/24/1989 GEORGIA RAMIREZ
DEPUTY CITY CLERK
•
A G E N D A
ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
ATASCADERO ADMINISTRATION BUILDING
6500 PALMA
FOURTH FLOOR, ROTUNDA ROOM
JANUARY 24, 1989
7 :00 P.M.
RULES OF PUBLIC PARTICIPATION:
* Members of the audience may speak on any item on the agenda.
* A person may speak for five (5 ) minutes .
* No one may speak for a second time until everyone wishing to
speak has had an opportunity to do so.
* No one may speak more than twice on any item.
* Council Members may question any speaker; the speaker may
respond, but, after the allotted time has expired, may not
initiate further discussion.
* The floor will then be closed to public participation and
open for Council discussion.
Call to Order
Pledge of Allegiance
Roll Call
City Council Comment
** Introduction of New Employees :
- Danny Hillstock, Engineering Technician II (Public Works )
- Gary Simms , Senior Civil Engineer (Public Works )
COMMITTEE REPORTS:
(The following represents Ad Hoc or Standing Committees .
Informative status reports will be given, as felt necessary. )
1 . City/School Committee 6 . Economic Opportunity
2 . North Coastal Transit Commission
3 . S .L.O. Area Coordinating 7 . Finance Committee
. Council ( Police Fac . , Lake
4 . Traffic Committee Acquis . & Pavilion)
5 . Solid/Hazardous Waste Mgmt. 8 . Business Improvement
Committee Association
COMMUNITY FORUM:
The City Council values and encourages exchange of ideas and
comments from you, the citizen. The Public Comment Period is
provided to receive comments from the public on matters other
than scheduled agenda items. To increase the effectiveness of
Community Forum, the following rules will be enforced:
A maximum of 30 minutes will be allowed for Community Forum,
unless Council authorizes an extension.
* All remarks shall be addressed to Council, as a whole, and
not to any individual member thereof.
* No person shall be permitted to make slanderous, profane
or personal remarks against any Council Member or staff.
Any person desiring to submit written statements to the
Council may do so by forwarding nine (9) copies to the City
Clerk by 5 : 00 p.m. on the Wednesday preceding the Council
Meeting.
A. CONSENT CALENDAR:
All matters listed under Item A, Consent Calendar, are considered
to be routine, and will be enacted by one motion in the form
listed below. There will be no separate discussion on these
items . A member of the Council or public may, by request, have
any item removed from the Consent Calendar, which shall then be
reviewed and acted upon separately after the adoption of the
Consent Calendar.
1 . JANUARY 10, 1989 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
2. DECEMBER 13, 1988 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES (Cont' d from
1/10/89)
3. FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT - DECEMBER 1988
4 . CITY TREASURER' S REPORT DECEMBER 1988
5. COUNCIL CONFIRMATION OF NEW PARKS & RECREATION DIRECTOR,
ANDREW TAKATA
6. ACCEPTANCE OF FINAL TRACT MAP 820325 : 1 - Ardilla & Balboa
Roads: Lots 14-17 & 33 of Block 24 (Dovica/Central Coast
Engineering)
7 . ACCEPTANCE OF FINAL PARCEL MAP 31-86 - 10955 San Marcos Rd.
(Morris/Stewart)
8. ACCEPTANCE OF FINAL TRACT MAP 15-88 - 84215 Amapoa Ave.
(Carr/North Coast Engineering)
2
9.: RESOLUTION NO. 5-89 - FIRE ENGINE REPLACEMENT
10. NEW PROPERTY INSURANCE PROGRAMS
11. RENEWAL OF BLUE SHIELD MEDICAL, DENTAL AND LIFE INSURANCE
B. HEARINGS/APPEARANCES:
1. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 1B-89/ZONE CHANGE 1-89 - 5575
Capistrano/5505 E1 Camino Real/9801 West Front Road
A. Resolution No. 3-89 - Approving amendments to the Land
Use Map of the Land Use Element of the City' s General
Plan (GP 1B-89 : City of Atascadero)
(Recommend adoption)
B. Ordinance No. 187 - Amending Maps 6 & 19 of the Offi-
cial Zoning Maps by rezoning certain real properties
from their current designations to "P" (Public) ( ZC 1-
89 : City of Atascadero)
( 1ST READING: Recommend ( 1 ) motion to waive reading
• of ordinance in full and approve by title only - Voice
note; ( 2 ) motion to approve Ord. No. 187 on first read-
ing - Roll call)
2. GENERAL PLAN CONFORMITY REPORT 3-88
3. APPEAL BY DON MESSER OF DENIAL OF GRADING PERMIT (5805
Capistrano - Hotel Park) (Applicant requests continuance)
C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
1 . STORM DAMAGE CLEAN-UP
2. ORDINANCE NO. 183 - AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 119 RELATING TO
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES (Cont' d from 12/13/88 & 1/10/89)
( 2ND READING: Recommend motion for adoption of Ord. No.
183 - Roll call )
*yr BREAK 'S
3 . ANTI-LOITERING ORDINANCE — PROPOSAL (Cont' d from 11/8/88)
A. Ordinance No . 189 - Adding Chapter 6 to Tile 5 of the
Atascadero Municipal Code relating to loitering by
minors during certain hours
( 1ST READING: Recommend ( 1 ) motion to waive reading
of ordinance in full and approve by title only —Voice
vote; ( 2 ) motion to approve Ord. No. 189 on first read-
ing - Roll call )
3
•
4. REQUEST FOR PARTIAL ABANDONMENT - SEWER EASEMENT (Century
Plaza) (Cont' d from 1/10/89)
D. NEW BUSINESS:
1. ADOPTION OF CHANGES TO ORDINANCE #135, THE CITY'S "EMERGENCY
ORGANIZATION ORDINANCE"
A. Resolution No. 6-89 - ' Signature Resolution' , author-
izing certain signatures on the various required
applications and documents submitted to the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (F.E.M.A. ) .
(Recommend Adoption)
B. Ordinance No. 190 - Amending Chapter 4 of Title 4 of
the Atasca ero Municipal Code relating to Emergency
Organizations and Functions
( 1ST READING: Recommend ( 1) motion to waive reading of
ordinance in full and approve by title only - voice
vote; ( 2) motion to approve Ord. No. 190 on first read-
ing - Roll call)
2 . HEATING, VENTILATING AND AIR CONDITIONING - CITY HALL
i
E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION/AND OR ACTION:
1 . City Council : Downtown Master Plan RFP & Steering Committee
2 . City Attorney
3 . City Clerk
4 . City Treasurer
5 . City Manager
COUNCIL WILL ADJOURN TO AN OPEN SESSION ON TUESDAY, JANUARY
31 , 1959 , AT 5 : 00 P.M. IN THE ROTUNDA ROOM FOR DISCUSSION OF
FINANCING ALTERNATIVES FOR VARIOUS CITY PROJECTS AND DIREC-
TION TO PROCEED.
4
MEET y AGENDA
•
ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL
MINUTES
Tuesday, January 10, 19B9
The regular meeting of the Atascaderc City Council was called to
order b,., Mayor Bergeson at 7: 00 p .m. Followed by the Pledge of
Allegiance.
ROLL --ALL :
Pres�pnt : Coil-l�LlifYiel-I L, I I ey , Shier n Dex te% and c,un c-illJoryten
fllackozy and Ma,!,or Scorgeson
Ra,Y, '-:indsor . Ci t y M a na g E?r Boyd S,"-t a r i t z . C I "y
Clerk ; 2ud Police Chief; Heinr -',1 Enoen.
Comim u n 3 ry De,,eelopment Director ; Paul Se:nsibaugh ,
Public Works Director , and -Jeff Jorge)isen. City
"ttor-
IL
I I V C D U 1',!C C01,,1r,'ENT :
• d a
M B')1 Q=-�s o'r,. -1.n h e h a F z.f , j 1 h F- L7 0 L !'I C L�> I'I e S S G' ld
ea-i tL7� t h L- S a f f . erriplr vers a n d ti e C-. I `_- 1, 7ens of F)tasz-zadero .
,D
ounc ma r, DE ter exp --ess'-�d t h a k el en 'I-,F--h a f f f vi� f e wt i is
i-c-c-)-v e r i n q vi e I
PROCLAMAT T Lnpj
NATIONAL VOLUNTEER BLOOD DONOR MONTH" "Janu-3-F-v
I P 3 1?. Mayor Boroe,son presented the proclamation to Ailbeat Youna
I
who ttas donated 10 ciallons of b7nod . Mr . YC)U!-Kj UT-Qed e': F'-','0-)1(-: (.-0
donate blood this Fridjay, at the Communit'-'/ ChUrch .
Ccju n c n',a n DE E- s t,--i t ed t h iFi -F':) , 76---1' was collected lczall -,, fcr
t h L- So 1 t 10 n Ar rrly A I MDa I,'TIC,s t s'S'0 0 o"o s c 0 j 1 e C t=Cj f(j
A I-o-'E:-n i --,!I rte IL , P{C-- .
r) I I TES REPOR---
,rj M T T I E:*:_ - ; :D
S'�0 A R EA C 0 0 R D I !!0^T I N G C 0 L INIC I L : M 3 1,'C r S'C!r�2 E—, n r e o o I L! i-ha,t t:i:E.
ji r G! 11,e F?t i 1-i g on Wednesday . They t"'i I be wel'-c-ming oui i-levj
del-egates : David E.,I a k v B j a n n Si-rt i t h 17 r--,',,o Gr,`nde, Di7k
-id -ft-c.ra,� Paso Rohl-�S . e I-;--
C' o r 0 m 1 s r-,i u EdC=h a Nick Ruissell
one public tem curl the i-egional
,,pdate, L-jhich
w i I i be scheduled for adoption in Febru3r,y. I he-e
--.o be four vc--,,)-t:al present--tions on !.-)ednesday 'd--=S 1 1 i iiith
• I C ji, 1 o r-n i a Clean A i i- AC t . t h C- Regiona ) Pide Sha-Fe -
0 t7,-1 Stlt
T i- a n o r t-a c::n C ci;-F,m i s s c)n
Rer or- t 0
LEL:EL: 1 8,t 'J F e &r,d o v er a .-�o k :ra':7~ a,.-ii -F c)i- t h e ✓F--ar Un c e,I-
•
Transportation they will adopt the 1909 Legislative Program and
:e:i .11 have a verbal report on Community Interaction Program which
is a pilot transit service status report . She will report to the
council at the next meeting on what took: place.
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE: Councilwoman Mackey said she
attended a meeting last Thursday . They are talking about the
closure of the Los Osos Landfill . There was a special meetino
today regarding Cole Canyon expansion appeal .
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION: !`'payor Oorgeson said she had
ee,eive0 a phone `all regarding someone Serving 0n this
cortrrissinri. Councilman Dexter will serve on this commission with
ourC-- iman Shiers, as the alter nate. Ray 1,indsor , "ity Man._)ger ,
vi 11 send a letter reaarding these appoirrtme-:ts.
POLICE. FACILITY COMMITTEE : City Manager , Ray Windsor , said this
Wi11 be addressed under Item D 5-A of the Agenda.
COMMUN17Y FORUM:
2runo spcl- regarding the pack of 'doQs that are rut:ninQ
goose in Atascadero . He 1-+=ported that a neichbor ' a calf had been •
>' these docs . Whert he c3 . led th _o1 ir-e 1ep.ar t^'lent he
wa= toid he *tad to call. Animal Control in Sart Luis Obispo .
Jeff Jor-aenseri, Citi. Att:orne-v responded that the Cit,,, cantrocts
r-,ith the Demartment of Animal Reaulations for the eriforcement cf
alt tt,e dog laws in the City of Atascadero and the City does not
have an independent ability to enforce dog violations . He
sjooests that in the future if he has a complaint about" dogs
rumina 'Dose in the neighborhood that he should immediately
ccntact the Department of Animal Regulation directly.
Maya,r Borae'Lon' said that perhaps when the North County
overt`irnent Center is on line, service Wil : be -Improved .
Ll 1 .i.ey, -t'.. .ted that t,Jh Pr-t pecio :.E' d 'r1ot feel t.h_' t thev
`� Qi' t i :"+CJ � ';-oiiip'C =-er : 1 '.P Y'Y'Of71 tFt� ;epar tME?il c }
Pc`0U _t Inc t-he t.1d let �.ta1 f 1,_n;.iw c.o that foI loL•. un =ar b�.'
alar-1.
Ctc . c L a S-1 1 e 3et?1:e regardino the appeal pl-ocedures of 14ffei ent
c i ties -. r, Sart Lui s Ob i s,pc Court ty. At:a.scades-o -,as the mai t
and mist pur'itive appeal prccedu;-es .
Dct_tc G�wis asked about the status of tre Lewis Avenue Bridge
til C. e Pau1 Sensi `+aUQh said the bridge i= LArid'er design ri h-r,
rlc:t:. With W 3 1 1 ace artd Assoc i ate •
Sarah Gronstrand said she wanted to inform the Council about the
accumulation of junk and garbage that is located just east of the
library on Morro Road . Henry Engen, Community Development
Director , said he would have staff check on it on Wednesday
morning .
Bernice Hazebrook , 7655 Balboa Rd . , spoke regarding the amount of
debris she has from falling branches and trees. She wanted to
lnow if She can burn or what would be the best way that citizens
dispose of this tremendous amount of brush .
Ra;- t•lindsor , City Manager , reported that an Emergency was
declared and appealed to the State for some funding and also to
the Courity for some help including equipment . So far we have
been unable to obtain that . At this time he does not have an
answer . Council may be asked for money to rent chippers in the
suture. This will be a council agenda item for the, next meeting .
Mi laz=bs-ook: ash ed i f she r-tinted the -h ipoer and cleans this up
and then money is allocated will she be reimbur-sed?
City Attorney, Jeff Jor;;i risen, said ti'iat financial C+bl. igatiton
gists with the property owner .
`,. C[i;>1SENT CALENDAR:
1 . December 13, 1988 Council Minutes
2. December 1.4, 1988 Joint Council/Planning Commission Minutes
3. December 21 .. 1988 Special City Council Minutes
4 . Finance Department Reel or't - November i988
City 1"reastar-e- ' s R-mo,-t - November 1928
Claim of Marie S. Bi-awn ( 5'75, 000) - Rec-o:mmend Denial
Claim of Rebecca Williamst �r250.0J=�0 ) - Pecommend Denial
Acceptance of Final Tract Map 1-8B, T-290 and R'%9(;= Las Lomas
Read (Richard Moritanaro )
CP r pprc),.al of_ Tentative Tract Map 19-88, 5c?OG Bajada Avenue
( David and Valerie Low)
Renes al of Blue Shield Vision mare
11. . Letter c.onfirmino CouriciIman Mazkey ' s Cont inuinq to Serve
on CC)l.l!-, >' Solid 'W'av�te :ommittee & FpPointment to
Hazardou, Waste Committee
-3-
12. Absence of Councilmember Dexter on May 23, 1989
Cjty Manager, Ray Windsor , indicated to council that Item 1 will
need to be held as the minutes for that meeting are not available
fcr this meetino .
Councilwoman Mackey expressed concern about the lack of play
space at the item A-9 project ; 10,O00 square foot lots would be
preferable.
MOTION: By Councilwoman Mack-ey, seconded by Councilman Shiers
to approve Consent Calendar Items A 2-12. passed
unanimously by rcll call vote.
B. HEAR I I-JGS A.PP EARANCES.
1 . ORL i MANCE NO. 184 - ---'ONE CHANGE 14-92, CLAR I F Y I NE; THE i ,,2
ACRE MINIMUM LOT S1?E STANDARD FOR LSF-X AND RSF-X. SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS
H4riry Engen, Community Development Director , gave the staff
n�•_}s t .
J zjh ? Falk`nste-jri. -l!>='s tc� Engineering , asked ;-f thF_-'
gar& sural that all the :eopl.e within these zones know that
�hei.t- l ano is beis-a re--oned .
Cc,uric i 1 comments followed .
MOTION: 2:- Councilman Shiers, seconded by Councilman Dexter
for adoption of Ordinance 184. Passed by Roll Call
Vote with Councilwoman [lackey voting no .
ORD I NA!'!CE 1\10. 183 - AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1 1 9 RELATING TO
PE%1'ELOP!`1EE,;T IMPACT FEES
0TrOI B•• Mayor Eor-geson, seconded b , Councilman i_: lley to
,continua this item u.nti1 the January 24th meeting .
Passed Unar i;i:ous l . .
F'ES0L 1 1T i.ON i IO 1-89 - t ENERAL PLAIN A!-iE.NDMENT 1 A-8P. 1.07P.5 $.
,,',_]2 , cL CAM I NO REAL. - E EOUE ST AMENDMENT OF THE LAND USE MAP
13F THE GENERAL PLAN TO EXPAND THE URBAN SERVICES LINE
Hent-, - len, 1- Demur;i ty De�.elopmen t Director , gave staff
rP 1 1 t .
q Public Comment Glen Lewis spoke on, behalf of the
Colombo Family.
'10T1ON: ray CC L I T I C i i n,an Li I I =eccndcd b Councilman Shiers
to approve Resclu.tior, Pic . I-89. Pa=-s(.-,d unanimf:: usly .
-4-
4 . TREE REMOVAL REQUEST : 9582 LAUREL ROAD
Henry Engen, Community Development Director , gave staff
report .
MOTION: By Councilwoman Mackey, seconded by Councilman
Dexter to approve the removal of the heritage
tree with mitigation measures as recommended by the
arborist ' Passed unanimously.
At 9:20 p .m. Mayor Borgeson asked for a lO minute recess.
At B: -')O p .m. Mayor Borgeson called the Council back to order .
� . UNFI|«ISHED BUSINECB:
l ' DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN AND TASK FORCE
�ey Windsor , City Manager , gave the staff report . He asked
t�at "Task Force" be changed to "Steering Committee" .
Rotert Prophet , 5355 Palma, encouraged the Council to make
s�re that the steer ; ng committee has a real say so on what
goes on. R,�,y Windsor , Citv Manager , than�ed Mr . Prophet for
his evceI , e1-1t comments '
1 ' ABAnDON EASEMENT - CENTURY PLAZA
Rey Windsor , City Manager , requested that Counci ] continue
this item until the 3anuary 24th meeting '
MDT ON: B� Mayor Borgeson, seconded by Councilman Dexter to
continue the Abandon Easement - Century Plaza until
the January 24th meeting . Passed unanimously.
RE�UE�T FOR ]NITIATION OF ZONINB ORDINANCE TEXT A�END�ENT -
DAMI51-4 CARE CEJ-�TER
�emv Ergen, Comtunity �ev�lopment gave the staff
report irdicatinq that CUP ' s for such faciIities appeared
the like) v remedv to resoond to this request .
Counci ] comments followed
-
MikeArr�mbide stated that skilIed nursing facilities are
highly regulated and the off '4.-:e of state wide f:nding in
Sac rawento actually acts as the bui ] ding department and
t�ere ar� extremely stringent rr-quirements in �erms of the
���� numoers Cf square feet oer pet �ent which would be allowable
miniMuMs as well as ma^ imums . What coes on in the
-5-
exterior of the building is certainly a function of
this local body in terms of numbers of parking spaces and
appearance.
Anne Marie Kirkpatrick stated that if you are increasing the
number of beds or residents , you will be increasing the
number of workers , make it necessary for more parking .
MOTION: By CounciIman Dexter , seconded by Councilman Shiers
to in-iti; ate, for review and consideration, a Zoning
Ordirance Text Amendment relative to the residential density
and development standards for group Quarters. Passed
unanimously by roll call vote.
3.
APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CRITERIUM BICYCLE RACE - MAY 7, 19B9
Paul Sensibaugh , Public Works Director , gave a brief staff
report ,
Ray Windsor , City Manager , if Council authorizes '-,his any
�ddition�l costs will come out of the department ' s- budget
and he will w�ork the depa.-tment to see how t|`at is handled '
3ne Pamirez ° representative for the North C"ounty Cycling
Club , said hi group is anxious to be working t,�ith the Perks
and Recreation Department on thJs upcoming event .
Maggie Fice -From the Chamber of Commerce Office asked that
Council seriously consider this joint effort '
Mayor Bcrgeson thanked Georgia Ramirez and Paula Anton for
their past effort-- on special events including races .
MOTION: Bv Councilwoman Mackey , seconded by Councilman
Sh .;ers to approve the permit for the Criterium
Bicycle Race on May 7^ 1929 3nd to allow the
departmental budget to cover the City costs .
Passed unenimccusly by roll, call ':yte.
� , BEPTIC FAILU�E - 5�3l JUA�EZ - REQUEBT FOR RELIEF
Staff report was given by Paul Sensibauch , Public Works
Director .
�ohn Falkenstein, Cuesta Engineering , representing Mr .
C,3rrick stated Mr . Carrick is in escrow to sell his house
an� was ur/able to get a certif� cation for his �e�tic system.
Mr , [arrick appIied for a per/:it to rebuild the septic
system on November l . Last week Mr ' Contractor
uork on the project , unfortunately i�hrough
_�_
miscommunication between Mr . Carrick and his contractor
no one picked up the permit that was available at the Bldg .
Department counter . Therefore his project was red tagged .
They were then notified that the lot was located in the
sewer district and therefore under the ordinance he must
connect to the sewer . Also , tree protection is being
required .
.Jeff Jorgensen, City Attorney , asked Mr . Falkenstein if his
client would agree that when the sewer does in fact become
available through some future project , at that time the
septic system would be a! andoned and the house would be
connected to the sevier . Mr . Falkenstein said that w culd
be ac-eotable.
MOTION: By Councilman Dexter , seconded by Councilman Lilley
*:r a^prove a. wei -ver for the above property until sewer
service become:, available. at which time the property must
comply with the City Code for connection requirements .
This will also be included in the Escrow instructions.
Pia=:sed urnanimously by roll call vote.
=_T r'_IS rF PART OF VAR I IDUS RR03 EC T S aIJD RE0LIEE T FOR STLID Y
S I CY"I S
Sta`-f `epor t was ;iven bk Pay vJindsor and Henr Ef,ge;-7.
C:ou:-rci 1 Comments fol low-•red .
MOTION: By Mayor Bocce-son, seconded by Councilman Lilley
the conser+sus of the council is to pursue enforcement
against the more flagrant ,,iolations of the sign ordinance
and place as a low priority enforcement of merchandise
displays pending further study of amendments to the sign
ordinance . Passed unanimously.
r) ?o, , rit meeting with the Plann'inq r�:rw1:5= iQn Coli l l be h.?lci
Jaiiuo.,-y 17 ,at 77-30 p .m. i- egarding the Gene)-al Plan up,iate .
A Gir: tiI)Q N'ith tF;A PIar)niung l..'omrrr.tr_;n w 1 1 1 tie held an
:1,:., 3n 3n at , . 30 n . m. t -c :ew ro)roposed Tree O;- dinar_e
-c�• i, ion ,
mcaeting ..ill be held on J.nnua - , 31 to dis,cuss fir,arI. ing ^f
maj%i a p i t a I improvements an? direction to proceed .
hi ;arc e.t tC; t. , 1I be hE?Id r . 5 >'.. G ,rti.
Di.1t=3i_ DE-BERM 11,1447 1 ON:
-_� 1 d they '-rc>tR_r1 },C FT'r'('t a :3 ^r cu��r <r n d �cud ] t;hr t0
ss r,
} c d h I"; 1 1 t`,r' a Fi E' L
-. .. .. - -
r,L. =lty LPI' ..'t 6i_ld the 1 - k.P_ P I {: . C) -S MLi c 1;�iE'',
-7-
the highest priorities and if so how do you wish to proceed in
terms of financing . The resignation of Mike Lara from the Parks
and Recreation Commission needs to be acknowledged and he needs
direction from Council to direct him to come back with the
appropriate certificate of recognition for Mike ' s past service on
this commission. Council needs to discuss in the near future as
to how they want to handle the replacement or whether or not you
want to reduce the number on that commission. This will be an
agenda item for the next meeting .
MEETING ADJOURhJED AT 10:25 P.M. TO A CLOSED SESSION. CLOSED
SESSION ADJOURNED AT 10:45 p.m.
MINUTES RECORDED BY :
BOYD C. SHAR 1 Tc, `CITY CLERK
P-'REFARED Ev .
GEORGIA RAMIRE7 . DEPUTY CITY CLERK
MEET{N AGENDA
DA Z ITEM A Z
•
ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL
MINUTES
DECEMBER 13, 1988
The regular meeting of the Atascadero City Council was called to
order at 7 :30 p.m. by Mayor Borgeson, followed by the Pledge of
Allegiance.
ROLL CALL
All Present: Councilmembers Dexter, Lilley, Mackey, Shiers and
Mayor Borgeson
Staff Present: Ray Windsor, City Mgr. ; Mark Joseph, Admin. Svcs .
Director; Lt. Bill Watton, APD; Henry Engen,
Commun. Devel . Director; Paul Sensibaugh, Public
Works Director; Jeff Jorgensen, City Atty. ; Boyd
• Sharitz , City Clerk; Cindy Wilkins , Acting Deputy
City Clerk
COUNCIL COMMENT
Councilwoman Mackey noted having received calls from persons in-
quiring as to how they could donate needed items to the Armenian
earthquake victims . Councilman Dexter responded that persons
wishing to help in some way are encouraged to contact any number
of relief organizations ( i .e. , World Council of Churches, Church
World Service, United Methodist Relief, the Catholic agencies and
the Armenian Church) . He noted that the Boards of New York are
working to establish a firm network with the Armenian Churches
for the transfer of funds to Armenia. Mayor Borgeson urged the
organization of aid from Atascadero.
Council concurred to cancel the 12/27 Council meeting.
COMMITTEE REPORTS
City/School Committee - Mr. Windsor reported that staff is in the
process of setting up the next meeting (to be hosted by the AUSD)
and wishes to discuss the location of the Jr. High School .
North Coastal Transit - Councilman Dexter reported at last week' s
meeting there was discussion of how to increase transit coverage
from Morro Bay, S.L.O. and Atascadero to Cal Poly and Cuesta.
• Police Facility Committee/Atascadero Lake Acquisition Committee/
Bicentennial Committee - Mr. Windsor noted that these committees
now fall under review by the Council Finance Sub-Committee .
1
•
COMMUNITY FORUM - No public comment.
A. CONSENT CALENDAR
1. November 22, 1988 City Council minutes
2. November 29, 1988 Joint Council/Planning Commission minutes
3 . Approval of Final Parcel Map 19-87 , 2800 Ardilla
4 . Approval of request for time extension for TTM 24-87, 7425
El Camino Real
5. Approval of request for time extension for TTM 26-86, 7408-
7478 Santa Ysabel
6. Award of contract for design of traffic signal at inter-
section of Santa Rosa Rd. & E1 Camino Real
7 . Res. No. 112-88 - Approving the sale of bonds for Street
Assessment Dist. No. 5 (Chandler Ranch)
8. Senate Resolution 46 - List of maintenance & construction
needs for 1990-2000
9 . Res. No. 114-88 - Authorization to participate in career
opportunities development program
10. Claim of Brett Morris
11 . Res. No. 115-88 Authorizing City Manager and Administra-
tive Services Director to open City safe deposit box
12 . Res. No. 113-88 - Authorizing permanent Building Inspector •
position
13 . Authority for lease/purchase of copy machine
14 . Dial-a-Ride re-bid authorization
Anne Marie Kirkpatrick pulled Item A-2 and Councilman Dexter
pulled Item A-3 for discussion.
Motion: By Councilman Lilley to approve Items A-1 & 4-14 ,
seconded by Councilwoman Mackey; passed unani-
mously.
Re: Item A-2: Mrs . Kirkpatrick expressed that the minutes (spec-
ifically paragraph 1 ) don' t accurately reflect either the events
nor the dialogue that took place at the 11/29 Joint City Coun-
cil/Planning Commission meeting. She requested that the minutes
note that the meeting was continued because the room was filled
to capacity and people were turned away; secondly, Mr. Austin
Carlton, Caltrans , had indicated that he believed individuals
could submit written comments to CalTrans on the Hwy. 41 matter
until December 10th (not Dec . 1st, as the minutes reflect) . Mrs .
Kirkpatrick submitted typed excerpts from the 11/29 meeting
quoting Mayor. Borgeson' s conversation with Mr. Carlton regarding
the time limit for receiving testimony on the environmental doc-
ument, and she requested that they be included as part of the
official meeting minutes .
•
2
it
Motion: By Councilman Lilley that the typed excerpt sub-
mitted by Mrs . Kirkpatrick be included as part of
the 11/29 meeting minutes, along with the notation
that the meeting was postponed, in part, because
of room capacity regulations, seconded by Coun-
cilman Shiers; passed unanimously.
Re: Item A-3: Councilman Dexter reiterated his concerns about
the increase of flag lots; he suggested that the engineers for
subject property be requested to consider, prior to submittal of
final maps, an additional access road in order to increase fire
and police protection and to decrease injuries occurring when
entering the public right-of-way from private roads .
Motion: By Councilman Dexter to approve Item A-3 , seconded
by Councilwoman Mackey; passed unanimously.
B. HEARINGS/APPEARANCES
1 . TPM 16-88 Appeal, 12405 Santa Ana Rd. (First Nationwide
Bank/Volbrecht Surveys)
Mr. Engen gave staff report and responded to questions from
Council . He noted that there has been apparent illegal grading
done on parcel #4 pursuant to a pending, but as yet unissued,
building permit.
Public Comment
Alan Volbrecht, agent for First Nationwide Mortgage in this mat-
ter, reviewed the history of this map and addressed the findings
for denial, dated 11/15/88.
Steve LaSalle, resident, expressed he feels this is an example of
inappropriate development and a classic example of the minimum.
He commended the Planning Commission for pushing quality lot
sizes and maintaining a strong faith in the General Plan.
Marj Kidwell, 9980 old Morro Rd. , wondered if the 4 acre minimum
will now be in question and not used.
Further Council discussion ensued.
Motion: By Councilman Lilley to approve the applicant ' s
request as stated with the additions of Condition
#19 as per staff' s recommendation, and a Condition
#20 : "No trees will be removed during the course
of the construction of residences on either of the
four lots" . Motion seconded by Councilwoman
Mackey; passed by 3 : 2 roll-call, with Councilman
Shiers and Mayor Borgeson dissenting.
3
2. Res. No. 110-88 - approving proposed modification to Farmers
Market layout
Mr. Engen gave staff report. Mr. Windsor indicated that he met
with Mary Walsh of the Shoe Corral, who had expressed her con-
cerns regarding access to the store and whether or not the change
would be permanent; he has indicated to her that the change is
experimental and staff will work with the affected businesses to
gain maximum access . Mr. Jorgensen indicated that the authoriza-
tion for layout modification can be rescinded on 10 days notice
in case another plan is proposed or a problem arises .
There was no public comment.
Motion: By Councilwoman Mackey to approve Res . 110-88,
subject to staff working with the affected mer-
chants, seconded by Councilman Shiers; passed
unanimously.
3 . Ord. No. 184 - ZC 14-88 clarifying the 1/2 ac. min. lot size
standard for LSF-X and RSF-X SFR districts (1st reading, by
title only)
Mr. Engen gave staff report, referencing the revised Exh. D which
reflects the Planning Commission' s recommendation of 1/2 acre net
lot size. There was no public comment.
Motion: By Councilman Shiers to approve Ord. 184 and read
by title only, seconded by Councilman Dexter. (Mr.
Jorgensen clarified that the motion refers to re-
vised agenda Item B-3 . ) Mayor Borgeson read Ord.
184 by title only; motion passed by 3 : 2 roll-call
with Councilmembers Lilley and Mackey dissenting.
4 . Ord. No. 183 - Amending Ord. No. 119 relating to develop-
ment impact fees (1st reading, by title only)
Mr. Sensibaugh gave staff report and reverenced revised Ord. No.
183 , noting the addition of language under Sec. 3-12 . 10 : Excep-
tions, prior to subsection ( a) : "There is excepted from the fee
imposed by this Chapter the following: " . There was no public
comment.
Motion: By Councilwoman Mackey to approve Ord. 183 and
read, by title only, seconded by Councilman
Lilley. Mayor Borgeson read Ord. 183 by title
only; motion passed unanimously by roll-call .
COUNCIL RECESSED FOR A BREAK FROM 9 : 25 - 9 : 50 P .M.
4
Note, re: Item B-3: Mayor Borgeson clarified that the "No" votes
cast by Councilmembers Lilley and Mackey on Item B-3 relate to
Ord. No. 184 , not to the reading by title.
C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Ord. No. 185 - Accepting the State Penal Code requirements
relating to the selection and training standards of public
safety dispatchers (2nd & final reading, by title only)
(cont'd from 11/8/88 & 11/22/88)
Mr. Windsor noted the proposed ordinance stands as introduced.
There was no public comment.
Motion: By Councilwoman Mackey to approve Ord. 185 on 2nd
reading, by title only, seconded by Councilman
Shiers . Mayor Borgeson read Ord. 185 by title
only; motion passed unanimously by roll-call .
2 . Res. No. 111-88 - Modifying effective date to charge various
fees established by Res. No. 100-88
Mr. Engen gave staff report, referencing revised Res . No. 111-88 ,
dated 12/13/88 . There was no public comment.
Motion: By Councilman Shiers to approve Res . 111-88, sec-
onded by Councilman Lilley; passed unanimously by
roll-call .
3 . Amendment to Solid Waste Collection Contract extending term
for an additional two-year period - Wil-Mar Disposal (cont'd
from 11/22/88)
Mr. Windsor gave staff report. There was no public comment.
Motion: By Councilwoman Mackey to approve the First
Amendment of the Solid Waste Collection Contract
with Wil-Mar Disposal , seconded by Councilman
Shiers; passed unanimously.
4 . Ord. No. 186 - Changing time of City Council meetings from
7 :30 p.m. to 7 : 00 p.m. (2nd & final reading, by title only)
It was noted that this ordinance would be effective with the
Council ' s first regular meeting in January, 1989 . There was no
public comment.
5
i
Motion: By Councilwoman Mackey to approve Ord. 186 on
second reading, by title only, seconded by Coun-
cilman Shiers. Mayor Borgeson read Ord. 186 by
title only; motion passed unanimously by roll-
call .
D. NEW BUSINESS
1 . Consideration to initiate zoning amendment regulating off-
site sales of alcohol (cont'd from 10/25 & 11/22/88)
Mr. Engen gave staff report and clarified that the proposed
amendment would apply to future applications and would not be
retroactive for those establishments already licensed for alcohol
sales by the State Dept. of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) .
Discussion ensued regarding the extent to which the City has
control over the licensing and regulation of the purchase and
sale of alcoholic beverages . Mr. Jorgensen noted that the ABC
won' t issue a license for sales where local zoning prohibits .
There was no public comment.
Motion: By Mayor Borgeson that Council initiate a proposed
change to the City' s Zoning Ordinance requiring
that a conditional use permit be required for off-
site sales of alcoholic beverages and direct that
staff present proposed language and analysis to
the Planning Commission for public hearing and
bring a recommendation back to the Council . Mo-
tion seconded by Councilman Shiers; passed
unanimously.
2 . Res. No. 109-88 - Approving application for grant funds
under the California Wildlife Coastal & Parkland Conserva-
tion Bond Act of 1988
Mr. Windsor summarized staff ' s report, noting that these funds
are guaranteed under recently passed Prop. 70 , and the City does
not have to compete for them. There was no public comment.
Motion: By Councilwoman Mackey to approve Res . 109-88 ,
seconded by Councilman Lilley; passed unanimously
by roll-call .
3 . Downtown Master Plan and Task Force
Mr. Windsor gave staff report. Mayor Borgeson suggested that she
and Councilwoman Mackey work together on this subject and that
names of individuals and groups for consideration be submitted to
6
them, with which Council concurred. Mr. Windsor requested that
RFP' s be accomplished no later than mid-February. There was no
public comment.
E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION/AND OR ACTION
City Council - Councilman Dexter read a Mayor' s proclamation
urging the citizens of Atascadero to respond appropriately to the
victims of the recent Armenian earthquake through gifts to be
channelled through the World Council of Churches , Church World
Service or other accountable international relief agencies .
City Manager - A. Downtown lot acquisition: Mr. Jorgensen
indicated that if Council wishes to meet in closed session to
discuss this, it would be appropriate. Mayor Borgeson noted that
Council consensus is in favor of this lot acquisition, but that
Council would like to discuss negotiations in closed session;
Council prefers to hold the topic in confidentiality until that
time. Lon Allan, Atas . News, inquired as to the address and name
of property owner. Mr. Jorgensen responded that information
would be appropriate for disclosure at the time of announcing the
closed session.
Mr. Windsor noted an appeal regarding the Rocky Canyon rock
quarry was pending before the Co. Board of Supvrs . today. Staff
has met with rock quarry representatives , and have negotiated an
amicable resolution of the problem, in that they have agreed to
participate in the cost of the Santa Rosa/ECR traffic signal
installation; the Public Works Director has been authorized to
correspond to the Board that the City withdraws its appeal .
MEETING ADJOURNED AT 10 :30 P .M. TO A JOINT PUBLIC HEARING WITH
THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION AT 7 : 00 P.M. , WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER
14 , 1988 , IN THE NATIONAL GUARD ARMORY ON OLMEDA AT TRAFFIC WAY
IN ATASCADERO, TO CONSIDER TESTIMONY REGARDING HIGHWAY 41 .
MINUTES RECORDED BY:
BOYD C. SHARITZ, City Clerk
PREPARED BY:
CINDY WILKINS, Acting Deputy City Clerk
7
DAETtN y 9 AQENt}A ®
iTEM M _t..�. -.9
CITY OF ATASCADERO
• SCHEDULE OF DISBURSEMENTS
FINANCE DIRECTOR' S REPORT
FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER, 1988
DISBURSEMENTS
Hand Warrant Register for December, 1988 16 ,042. 98
12/02/88 Accounts Payable Warrants 86 ,807. 96
12/09/88 Accounts Payable Warrants 68,035. 07
12/16/88 Accounts Payable Warrants 29,736.47
12/23/88 Accounts Payable Warrants 62 ,938.19
12/28/88 Accounts Payable Warrants 124 ,532. 31
Service Charge-Mastercard/Visa 21. 79
12/31/88 Wire Transfers 1,664 ,711.11
12/07/88 Payroll Checks #44541-44669 102 ,315.14
12/21/88 Payroll Checks #44670-44800 102 ,122.01
Total 2 ,257 ,263. 03
LESS:
Voided Check #43878 166. 98
Voided Check #43185 151. 00
Voided Check #43886 374. 85
Voided Check #42550 240. 00
• Voided Check #44066 639.56
Voided Check #43042 50. 00
Total Disbursements 2 ,`155 ,640.64
I, MARK A. JOSEPH, do hereby certify and declare that demands
enumerated and referred to in the foregoing register are accurate
and just claims against the City and that there are funds avail-
able for payment thereof in the City Treasury. The breakdown
detail on all accounts is available for your viewing in the
Finance office.
MARK A. JOSEPH
Administrative Services Director
•
�► nom. ���
• CITY OF ATASCADERO
SCHEDULE OF CASH RECEIPTS AND TRANSFERS IN
TREASURER'S REPORT
FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER, 1988
CASH RECEIPTS:
Taxes :
Property Tax 751,560. 52
Sales Tax 184 ,257. 85
Motor Vehicle In-Lieu 53,649. 87
Cigarette Tax 3 ,631. 42
State Trailer In-Lieu 3,479.41
Development Impact Tax 7 ,577.50 -
Miscellaneous Taxes 565. 82
Other Receipts :
Licenses/Permits/Fees 48 ,992. 01
Franchise Fee 4,227. 05
Fines/Penalties/Overages 649.62
Investment Earnings 2 ,572. 76
P.O.S.T. Reimbursement 7,549.17
Canine Program 500.00
Sales-Maps/Publications/Reports 371. 85
Weed Abatement 12 ,272. 90
• Special Police Services 135. 00
Parks and Recreation Fees 11,856. 44
Gas Tax 49,485.64
Traffic Safety 8,544.26
Local Transportation 3 ,346. 80
Development Fees 16 ,089. 06
Zoo Reserve 55.00
Street Assessments 35 ,230.50
Zoo Receipts 1,563.64
Amapoa-Tecorida/Lewis Ave. Bridge (4 ,189.04)
Assessment District #5 229 ,050. 77
Miscellaneous 6 ,242.67
TOTAL CASH RECEIPTS 1,439 ,268.49
FUND TRANSFERS IN:
Sanitation Fund Reimbursement 127 ,148.40
OTHER CASH RECEIPTS:
Bail/Refundable Bonds 1,300.00
Reimbursement to Expense 2 ,543. 31
Refunds 7,852.48
TOTAL OTHER CASH RECEIPTS 11,695. 79
•
CITY OF ATASCADERO
CASH ACTIVITY SUMMARY •
TREASURER' S REPORT
FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER, 1988
BEGINNING CASH RESOURCES 2 ,737,763.13
ADD:
RECEIPTS 1,450 ,964.28
FUND TRANSFERS 127 ,148. 40
INVESTMENTS REDEEMED 622 ,000.00
LESS:
DISBURSEMENTS 590 ,929.53
FUND TRANSFERS 622 ,000. 00
ENDING CASH RESOURCES 3,724 ,946.28
SCHEDULE OF CASH RESOURCES Int. Due
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1988 Rate Date
Checking Account:
Mid-State Bank 133 ,695.17
Certificates of Deposit:
Butterfield Savings 99 ,000. 00 9. 13 03/07/89 •
First Cal Savings 99 ,000. 00 8. 90 05/16/89
Other Investments:
Local Agency Inv. Fund 2 ,435 ,000.00 8.47 N/A
Fed Home Loan Bank Disc. 957 ,711. 11 9.15 06/2.1/89
Note
Other Cash Resources :
Petty Cash 540.00
TOTAL CASH RESOURCES 3 ,724 ,946.28
GERE SIBBACH •
City Treasurer
D EflN A d � -
•
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: City Council
FROM: Ray Windsor, City Managerti
SUBJECT: New Parks & Recreation Director
DATE : January 24 , 1989
BACKGROUND
At your last meeting, I indicated that we would be hiring Andy
Takata as the new Parks & Recreation Director, effective February
6 , 1989 . Under the terms and conditions of the City' s Municipal
Code ( Sec. 2-4 . 09 ) , the appointment, removal, promotion and
demotion of department heads, Officers and employees shall be
• recommended to the Council for concurrence and confirmation.
RECOMMENDATION
Mr. Takata' s hiring is being brought to you in accordance with
the above requirements and is recommended for approval .
RW/cw
•
0
CITY OF ATASCADERO •
Cr
i
PRESS RELEASE
fODNOED 1
1913
F I .
The City of Atascadero is pleased to announce the appointment of
Mr . Andrew Takata to the position of Director of Parks and
Recreation. Mr . Takata finished first in a field of over 60
applicants.
He is the former Director of Parks and Recreation for the City of
Mammoth Lakes and served as Parks and Recreation Supervisor with •
the City of -Santa Fe Springs. While employed with the City of
Santa Fe Springs , he coordinated the Field _of Play for the Water
Polo venue during the 1984 Olympic Games. He received his
Bachelor of Arts degree from California State University at
Fullerton in Business Administration, holds a Masters Degree in
Education Administration and has completed additional coursework
in Recreation Administration as well as Public Administration.
He will make his home in Atascadero , with his wife Tami and two
children. Mr . Takata is scheduled to start work February 6,
1989, subject to confirmation by the City Council at the meeting
of January 24 , 1989. •
MAGENDA
�► ITEM l ...:
.
•
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: City Council January 24, 1989
VIA: Ray Windsor, City Manager
FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director .At
SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF FINAL TRACT MAP 820325:1
LOCATION: Ardilla & Balboa Roads (Lots 14 , 15, 16, 17 ,33 of Block
24)
APPLICANT: Charles Dovica (Central Coast Engineering)
BACKGROUND:
• On September 27 , 1982 , the City Council approved Tentative Tract
Map AT 820325 : 1, subject to certain conditions and in concurrence
with the recommendation of the Planning Commission.
RECOMMENDATION:
The required conditions have been complied with and the final map
is recommended for approval .
HE :ps
cc : Charles Dovica
Central Coast Engineering
•
V i5
16 v5 .-- 51 64 5 ! 14
�y!;V ) 34 52
19/2C ^ �� ! 33 Q .�, �3,
-�j' 5
2! cmc
o - -
193 224
4 15
29/30/ i g 120
t4a �•'
5134 1 '" \
�ILF 9 . y / r 8 i3I-
33° 7 1 Y '� 8 �; 19 89
9 s I g 75:
\, 32 : / 4 3 /7� tO, il` ( soe si es a rt t�3�0�
� 8 2331
1 32 ja 33 4 7' 6/5 �t !3/12 I I ! / I4 14 15 1$ t= I 1239 24d 2d
7
3
32J2 ` 93 e / % / /36 10 92 9 i r 16 t•� r�l•1i93�94 431
'�e, '1� �. 33f 35 14.!/ ;t3 7 I ��244 �2 �98 y991 00101�IC
✓-t,,a. / 34/ 14A/:2 7'
97. I
Y I \ 1p/
/10
398 /TA �' 1 i
15 �.` r 6 -� /� :/c , i 13 t2 t
49 1 29soi3o ,,� oe �``6�. 0 5 4
33 °fj�3o ,\ 17\ 21 /3 �� -47 6
/� 1822 I29
3 32 3 20 O �! I 27m O i \ 14
�l31� 9 4 \ 1-1
19 I 1 1 33 32 31 �q 1y7� 17e �19E C
\�-'C I CLI \ f 23 125 35 34 14
30 24 f
/' 23 `
A 3613 7�38131 40 \ 15 16 17 17c 17
19
12 ( I 41 17 e d ,i�c
;— --• 1 g c
�; 13 } 11 10 ( 9 8 it t 87O
6/,5 /4.
) 4 i 18 19
�1•� / _ j i '_ q 43 18 o
27 i I I / '
/ �4 ' 6 l ( t 3 I2 t I8b 18c a
8 Ii , I 12
5 /`�
' !V ----+ 12 a 33 a t t p I° MO
26 16 13
4 10
\\ } t2
LG 25 Z 17 2 2I 3 -9O 14 33 1
23� 24 32 $1t t
2
16
24 18 25 p
21 1 1 9 31 32 c
/ ��� 19 1 �-i3 OA 30 170� 30 29 \ 31 18 2go < '33° \
��.. �' 3
✓-'"c2 ` 27 � 1
19 2g 330
4/� 1 21 18 17 1 16 28 \ �, 20 28 d 34
15 / `. 20 / 15/
21 28 35 �
16 �� 19 \ i /19 I%13 II 10 9 22 .23 4 61
17 2 ��y / 20 / 7
0 / o / 6 2
13 2 / 21 l5 � ,2Z ( 6 5 4 �'
5 y
15 23 25 26 27 27c 't,8 / 2'
4 17 _4 1 __
6 \ 3 841 14 16 F� A 42 SITF— LOCATION /
Its AT 82x325 :I 37 1
7� p, 9 13 14 13 .rcjMQ c+-,a Ba.lboa
1 Is \ Lots 14, 15, 1(0, 11,33 LilockZ4-,
5 10 19 12 !
it 10 y t o 3 2 3c
12 20 4
-- I 7 � 4 I 3 2 i �� - _ � •
. j s
CENTRAL COAST
ENGINEERING
3% Buckley Road
San Luis Obispo
California 93QI February 13, 1989
E1698
Paul Sensibaugh
City Engineer
City of Atascadero
P.O. Box 747
Atascadero, CA 93423
RE: TRACT 1057, GRAVES CREEK ROAD
Paul,
Please find attached, the easement description and exhibit for the Front
easement at Graves Creek Road. Based on a fair market value of $1/sf, we
estimate the worth of the easement to be $1000. We propose a bond of $5000
be posted to insure that the City will be compensated for all costs
associated in securing the easements . This should satisfy our fiscal
responsibility as specified in the Subdivision Map Act.
Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this estimate.
Sincerely,
Mike S=atlocky
Attachments
cc: Larry Roberts
Telephone(805)544-3278
0
January 13, 1989
E 1698
An easement for storm drain purposes across portions of Lots 11C and 110 of
Block 17 of the A t a s cadero Colony as recorded at Book 3 Atascadero Colony
at Page 17 in the Office of the County Recorder, County of San Luis Obispo,
State of California, said easement comprised of two segments more
particularly described as follows and shown on Exhibit "A":
Segment 1: A twenty foot wide strip of land across said Lot 11D
bounded on the northeast by the northwest boundary as said Lot 11D.
Segment 2: That portion of said Lot 11C lying westerly of the
following described line:
Beginning at the northerly corner of said Lot 11C; Thence South 25030'
West a distance of 212 feet more or less to aP oint on the southwest
boundary of said Lot 11C, said point being distant 36 feet from the
westerly corner of said Lot 11C.
J
J
l 1�
IL,
FXH/6/T "A-
FEAUZ TD &rY DO hTAWAAMO
Our I ofl
siv16
II�EETI
WLA -7�.
•
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: City Council January 24 , 1989
VIA: Ray Windsor, City Manager
FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF FINAL PARCEL MAP 31-86
LOCATION: 10955 San Marcos Road
APPLICANT: John Morris (Dan Stewart)
BACKGROUND:
• On January 12, 1987 , the City Council approved Tentative Parcel
Map 31-86, subject to certain conditions and in concurrence with
the recommendation of the Planning Commission.
RECOMMENDATION:
The required conditions have been complied with and the final map
is recommended for approval.
HE:ps
cc: John Morris
Dan Stewart
• i
RS
L(FH)
L(FH) r
r,
R S (PD2)
L
SfTIF-, 10955"5AN MMDS WMD
f RS
RS4
�1
i
�l
- 1
'Po5
o�
P
O
RS
EXN I A-- LCCA•iIDM DER
` ' " ' T l'Yl►,R�[UJ��P11'LYII'AY 31-�L
1095-5 .SAN WWS TDhD
WID��l�i M Pax. SSTDAMW
MEET!
OAr zq 9 Zr
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: City Council January 24, 1989
VIA: Ray Windsor, City Manager
FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF FINAL TRACT MAP 15-88
LOCATION: 8425 Amapoa
APPLICANT: David Carr (North Coast Engineering)
BACKGROUND:
On August 9 , 1988, the City Council approved Tentative Tract Map
15-88, subject to certain conditions and in concurrence with the
• recommendation of the Planning Commission.
RECOMMENDATION:
The required conditions have been complied with and the final map
is recommended for approval.
HE:ps
cc: David Carr
North Coast Engineering
•
_ s
I •
���/I►pini rt:� ,� ���;. t_' ���'1t1�/1
U► ��� �
.��• ✓ I� �r : ��
• � MEETI Witl-LDA
•
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: City Council
FROM: Ray Windsor, City Manager
SUBJECT: Fire Engine Replacement
DATE : January 24 , 1989
This memo is intended to supplement Chief Hicks ' s report of
January 17th.
I would like to point out that this item was approved by Council
in both the regular 1988-89 Budget, as well as being reflected in
• the draft five-year Capital Improvement Program. It is intended
that the fire engine be acquired under lease purchase, which is
reflected in the actual budgeted amount for this fiscal year of
$12 , 500 . With your approval of this item, we will begin the nec-
essary paperwork to accomplish lease purchase and will report
back to you on the exact details of the financing, including the
annual payment, when this is accomplished. Incidentally, the
total estimated cost for this equipment is shown in the CIP as
$105 , 000 .
RW: cw
•
•
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: 1/17/89
TO: City Council
VIA: Ray Windsor, City Manager
FROM: Mike Hicks , Fire Chief
SUBJECT: 4X4 fire engine replacement (Resolution No. 5-89)
Background:
As approved in the 1988/89 budget, the Atascadero City Fire
Department was authorized to replace a 1961 4X4 fire engine which
has been out of service as a four-wheel-drive fire engine since
August of 1987 , due to equipment failure that cannot be repaired.
We have been searching for months for a replacement at an
affordable cost and at the same time acquire high quality that
would have a lifespan of 20-25 years . While searching for this
engine, we discovered we could piggy-back on the State of •
California bid with West-Mark Manufacturing of Ceres , California,
for a total price of $92 , 083 . 00 plus tax.
Recommendation:
It is my recommendation that you authorize the purchase of this
engine using the State of California bid P.O. #02883 , P.E. #7-EE-
-60-11 for the total price of $92 , 083. 00 plus tax.
The purchase procedure would be as follows : $47 , 837 . 00 at time
of delivery of the chassis to the manufacturer. The chassis
delivery would be 90 to 120 days , with balance payable upon
delivery of the completed engine, an additional 90 days from
receipt of the chassis . We would most likely receive the fire
engine sometime in August and would have it in service for the
worst part of the next fire season.
It is my opinion that this is the best deal we are going to find.
The State of California is not expected to go to bid for 4X4
engines in the next budget . We used piggy-back bids for our last
two engines , with the City of Delano and the City of Morgan Hill ,
and found this to be the most economical procedure available .
01�"/6b_o
•
MIRE HICKS
MH:pg
P. O. BOX 418
Ceres, California 95307
Phone (209) 537-4747
January 10, 1989
Atascadero Fire Department
6005 Lewis Avenue
Atascadero, Ca. 93422
Chief Michael Hicks
Dear Chief, ,
West- r s Ef the AtaScadero Depart a California
Depa , fitFbs fir whe8 �rivefe truck, ave a state con-
tract;at this'tand will give ypua body and tank build' ` the same
price as the tt� e ordertk
f �� "
�v r 4 +,
The State o Californ �su�ipliespgest-Mark a chassis o pumps
and the prim pump, so we will sup �ly�ia complete State n : lifornia
�? ,
Department of pump,
fire truck with' the same buildup as_ t"te of
California, P O_ #02883, P.E. #7-EE 6a-11. Bob,F? ola - (9 24-7799.
Base price form, dy and tank c 4i' $. � 40.00
Light bar charems "
Total � v .<" 0
�;z
"{ k
The pricing is as foils-6ws €` '
Body and tank buildup ; $36,790.00
Berkley pumping unit,, B13�XQBS 21 desiel � 4,997.00
Hale P.T.O. CBP 4 ipbmp 1,976.00
Primer pump 483.00
International four-wheel drive chassis as per
the State of California specification. The
chassis`price is for the chassis to be paid
for upon receipt of chassis. $47,837.00
i
STAINLESS STEEL • ALUMINUM • MILD STEEL FABRICATION
TRANSPORT TANKS • PRESSURE VESSELS • PLANT EQUIPMENT
REFRIGERATED HOLDING TANKS
The four-wheel drvie fire truck will be built to State of California
specifications complete with the list of equipment and ladder.
Delivery: the chassis is approximately 90 to 120 days and we will
deliver with the completed truck in 90 days from receipt of the chassis.
Warranty: all parts of the apparatus supplied by West-Mark shall be
guaranteed against failure due to faulty design and workmanship for a
period of one (1) year.
Total price $92,083.00
plus any applicable state tax
F. 0. B. Ceres, Ca.
Wayne Kindred
Fire Truck Division Manager
i
RESOLUTION NO. 5-89
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF ATASCADERO
TO PARTICIPATE IN EXISTING GOVERNMENTAL COOPERATION
PURCHASES SINGULARLY OR WITH OTHER MUNICIPALITIES
BE IT RESOLVED that the Atascadero City Council does hereby
authorize participation directly with other governmental agencies
in cooperative purchases either on an individual basis or in
conjunction with other municipalities in order to purchase
budgeted firefighting equipment for and on behalf of the City of
Atascadero ; and that Ray Windsor, City Manager, Purchasing Agent,
is hereby authorized and directed to sign and deliver all
necessary requests and other documents in connection therewith
for and on behalf of the City of Atascadero.
On motion by and seconded by
, the foregoing resolution is
hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote :
AYES :
NOES :
ABSENT:
ATTEST: City of Atascadero
BOYD C. SHARITZ, City Clerk BONITA BORGESON, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
JEFFREY G. JORGENSEN RAY WINDSOR
City Attorney City Manager
QAy �O
n� -�- IC
M E M O R A N D U M
To : City Council
Through : Ray Windsor , City Manager
From: Mark A. Joseph , Admin. Services Director
Date: January 18, 1989
Subject : New Property Insurance Programs
BACKGROUND
The City ' s current property insurance policy is through the
Gordon Hunt Insurance Agency, at a rate of $9,908 per year .
Through our participation in the Central Coast Cites Joint Powers
Agreement (JPA) , we have the opportunity to insure through the
JPA and save slightly over 50 percent of our current premium. If
we include the Boiler and Machinery Policy, we still save over
one-third of our current amount . The attached proposal provides
further detail .
• The new policy ' s effective date is March 1 , 1989. Our current
agent has been notified of our interest to change policies.
An additional benefit of this proposal is that it will provide
coverage to the Police Facility and the Pavilion. Council is
aware that no insurance coverage exists for the Police Facility.
As of January 20, 1989, we were notified that the Pavilion would
not be covered , due to its prolonged vacancy.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends endorsing the new property insurance policy,
including Boiler and Machinery coverage, and direct staff to
enter into the new coverage, if offered by the JPA, effective
March 1 , 1989.
\ 1\newjpa
•
.�a
s
RECEIVED •
JAN 0 31989
CITY MGR.
DATE: December 28 , 1988
TO: Central Coast Cities Member Cities
FROM: Mike Simmon Program Administrator
RE: PROPOSED PROPERTY PROGRAM
At the December 6th JPA meeting, you were presented with
a premium quotation for property insurance. This quote
provided coverage to each CCC member city within a
master program.
It was agreed that these quotes would be finalized and
presented to each city individually. The proposed
effective date is now March 1, 1989.
•
To secure these rates, we must have a minimum number of
cities bind coverage. Because of this, do not cancel
your current coverage until the program is finalized.
Please use the enclosed information to make a decision
for your city prior to the next JPA meeting in February.
You are welcom to contact wither myself or Cricket Deetz
with any questions at (415) 983-9624 .
•
QUOTATION
ATASCADERO
CURRENT PROGRAM PROPOSED PROGRAM
EXPIRING LIMIT $ 6,930 , 400 $ 6,930,400
PREMIUM/RATE $ 9 ,908 $ 5,414
.143 .078
SDEDUCTIBLE $ 5,000 $ 5,000
10,000
ANNUAL SAVINGS $ 4, 494
PERCENTAGE SAVINGS 51%
Presented By The
Fred. S. James & Company
Public Entity Group
505 Sansome Street
San Francisco, CA
94111
•
SPECIFIC ADVANTAGES TO YOUR CITY:
The City of Atascadero is currently purchasing their property
insurance on a number of different policies. We can consolidate
coverage in one program. We are offering comparable coverage on one
policy at a rate of $. 078 compared to your average rate of $ .143 .
This rate difference generates an annual savings of $4 ,494 .
DISADVANTAGES:
The only disadvantage to purchasing coverage through the group program
is that you would no longer have a breakout of fire insurance costs by
department/location by policy. However, we can provide you with a
breakout by department/location specifically to your request.
BOILER & MACHINERY:
Boiler & Machinery coverage is being offered for an annual premium of
$1,108 for a limit of $1 ,000,000 and a deductible of $2,500. This is
a very reasonable premium considering the city' s sewer treatment plant
exposure. Included in this quote is $25,000 extra expense for
business interuption losses. We can increase that limit at your
request.
RECOMMENDATION:
We are recommending that Atascadero cancel their current coverage and
purchase property coverage as part of the CCCSIF effective March 1 ,
1989 . If the city does not currently purchase boiler & machinery
coverage they should bind coverage at the same date. If you currently
purchase B & M then we suggest that you compare your current program
against our quote.
CITY OF: ATASCADERO
PAGE 1 OF 1 Schedule of Values
01-Dec-$8
Loc. V A L U E S Year
No. Buildings Contents TOTAL Class Built Sq. Ft. Cost Per: Location/Address
---- --------- -------- ----- ----- ----- ------- --------- ----------------
1 4,017,000 560,000 4,577,000 C 1,919 48,205 $83.33 1 Administration Building, 6500 Palma Ave.
2 525,300 12,000 537,300 D 1,950 6,400 $82.08 2 Pavilion Bldg., Atasc. Lake (Jazzercise)
3 408,000 500,000 908,000 C 1,950 5,596 $72.91 3 Fire Station, 6005 Lewis Ave.
4 249,900 350,000 599,900 C 1,987 4,243 $58.90 4 Fire Station, 9801 West Front
5 640,000 0 640,000 RC 1,955 12,000 553.33 5 Police Department, 5505 El Camino Real
6-1 77,000 650,000 727,000 C 1,960 1,560 $49.36 6-1 Pub. Works Control Bldg, 5599 Traffic Way
6-2 33,000 350,000 383,000 C 1,960 640 $51.56 6-2 Public Works Pump & Engine Bldg.
7-1 100,000 70,000 170,000 C 1,980 1,200 583.33 7-1 Sewer Treatment Plant, Gabarda Rd.
7-2 28,200 197,000 225,200 S 1,980 1,440 $19.58 7-2 Sewer Pump Bldg.
--------- -------- ---------
6,078,400 2,689,000 8,767,400
T.I.V.: 8,767,400 LIMIT: CONSTRUCTION D = FRAME
DESIRED RATE: 0.06 DEDUCTIBLE: CLASS KEY: C = BRICK/MASONRY
PREMIUM: 5,260 S = ALL STEEL
NC = NON COMBUSTABLE
B = FIRE RESISTIVE
RC = REINFORCED CONCRETE
B* = WITN FALSE FRAME ROOF
S* = INCDS WOOD FRAME OFFICE SPACE
NC* = SPECIAL INTERMEDIATE
• Q" EEr' AGENDA
M E M O R A N D U M
To : City Council
Through: Ray Windsor , City Manager
From: Mark Joseph/1�46
Date: January 18, 1989
Subject : Renewal of Blue Shield Medical , Dental and Life
Insurance
BACKGROUND
Council approved renewal of the Blue Shield Vision Care contract
at its January 10, 1989, meeting . At that time it was noted
additional contracts were forthcoming . This item recommends
renewal of the Medical , Dental and Life Insurance contracts.
As with Vision Care, the effective date of these policies is
November 1 , 1988.
• Summarized below are the primary changes in benefits provided .
I . Medical
A Annual Physicals are excluded ;
A Routine Mammographies are in;
• Limited Family Counseling is in;
A Limited Bone Marrow transplants are in; and
A A single $6.00 out-patient prescription drug charge per
prescription replaces the existing practice of applying
the cost of prescription drugs towards the annual
deductible.
II . Dental - No changes noted
III . Life Insurance - No changes noted .
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends renewing the contracts.
• \h\contract
APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE TO •
CALIFORNIA PHYSICIANS' INSURANCE CORPORATION
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA
for the insurance afforded by Group Policy No. 917156-000/001 I the terms of which are hereby
accepted and approved to take effect on November 1, 1988, as specified in the Policy. It is agreed
that this application, which is executed in duplicate, supersedes any previous application for this
Policy.
Dated at
Applicant THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA
Address __ 6500 PALMA, ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA 93423
By •
Title
Agent
PLEASE SIGN AND RETURN ORIGINAL TO
. )Alk SM CPIC
�%Nc-�
�"`` CALIFORNIA PHYSICIANS' INSURANCE CORPORATION
P.O. BOX 7725 SAN FRANCISCO • CA 94120-7725
•
P-1
G►ARI(1"
APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE TO
BLUE SHIELD of California
(California Physicians' Service)
FOR A GROUP HEALTH SERVICE CONTRACT
BY
THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA
whose main post office address is 6500 PALMA�
ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA 93423
This contract, number 917156 (DENTAL) , shall be effective November 1, 1988.
It has been read and approved, and the terms and conditions are accepted by the Contractholder.
This application is executed in duplicate. The original shall be returned to Blue Shield of California, Two
North Point, San Francisco, California 94133.
It is agreed that this application supersedes any previous applications for this contract.
Datedat ------—-------------------------------------------
------------------_-------------------_-_____--_--________
---__---__-- day of ------------------------------------------ 19
this __------------- ------------------
(Legal Name of Applicant)
By
Titlew-------------___��-----------------
As Contractholder, you are responsible for communicating to Subscribers as soon as possible(and in any
case, no later than 30 days after receipt) all changes in benefits and in any provisions affecting benefits.
PLEASE SIGN AND RETURN ORIGINAL OF THIS PAGE TO
BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA
AT THE ABOVE ADDRESS.
Inquiries concerning any problems that may develop in the administration of this Contract should be
directed to Blue Shield of California at the above address.
® BLUE SHIELD
of Caiifr n , a
GC-AP (2/87)
9
APPLIC4TION IS HEREBY MADE TO
BLUE SHIELD of California
(Califomia Physicians' Service)
FOR A GROUP HEALTH SERVICE CONTRACT
BY
THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA
whose main post office address is _6500 PALMA
y- _
ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA 93423
This contract, number 917156-000 , shall be effective November 1, 1988
It has been read and approved, and the terms and conditions are accepted by the Contractholder.
This application is executed in duplicate. The original shall be returned to Blue Shield of California, Two
North Point, San Francisco, California 94133.
It is agreed that this application supersedes any previous applications for this contract.
Dated at ____-----__---_________
this day of 19 _
_____—______ _______________w__________�____________
(L.egsl Name of Applican[)
By
Title
As Contractholder, you are responsible for communicating to Subscribers as soon as possible (and in any
case, no later than 30 days after receipt) all changes in benefits and in any provisions affecting benefits.
PLEASE SIGN AND RETURN ORIGINAL OF THIS PAGE TO
BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA
AT THE ABOVE ADDRESS.
Inquiries concerning any problems that may develop in the administration of this Contract should be
directed to Blue Shield of California at the above address.
BLUE SHIELD
of V a l l # v i t 7 i s
GC-AP (2/87)
0 0�V 0 r-
•
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: City Council January 24, 1989
VIA: Ray Windsor, City Manager
FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director iK,
SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 1B-89/ZONE CHANGE 1-89
LOCATION: 5575 Capistrano - 5505 E1 Camino Real -
9801 West Front
APPLICANT: City of Atascadero
REQUEST: Amendments to the General Plan and Zone Change to
change the designation of various government owned
properties from their current designations to
"Public" and "P" (Public) .
BACKGROUND:
• This amendment was initiated as a "housekeeping item" relative to
three public sites . On January 3, 1989 the Planning Commission
conducted a public hearing on the above referenced subject. As
the County had requested a continuance for the County-owned
property at 5575 Capistrano, the Commission recommended approval
of the amendments to the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Map
for the properties at 5505 El Camino Real (Police Station site)
and 9801 West Front (Fire Station No. 2) .
RECOMMENDATION:
Approval of General Plan Amendment 1B-89 and Zone Change 1-89 as
reflected in Resolution No. 3-89 and ordinance No. 187 (excluding
the Capistrano property) .
HE :ps
Attachments : Staff Report - January 3, 1989
Resolution No. 3-89
Ordinance No. 187
Minutes Excerpt - January 3 , 1989
Corres. from Co. Property Manager - 12/30/88
•
i,
a .
1
CITY OF ATASCADERO Item: B-3 •
STAFF REPORT
FOR: Planning Commission Meeting Date: January 3, 1989
BY• ,OSteven L. DeCamp, Senior Planner File No: GP 1B-89
.P ZC 1-89
SUBJECT:
Consideration of amendments to the Land Use Map of the Land Use
Element of the General Plan and the Zoning Ordinance Map to
change the designation of various government owned properties
from their current designations to "Public" and "P" (Public) .
BACKGROUND:
There are three (3) parcels of land within the City that are
either now used for, or planned for future use, for government
purposes. The current land use designations and zoning districts
of these properties do not reflect their current or intended
uses. •
A. SITUATION AND FACTS:
1. Applicant. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .City of Atascadero
2. Project Address. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1. 5575 Capistrano
2. 5505 E1 Camino Real
3. 9801 West Front
4. Legal Description. . .. . . . . . . . 1. Ptn Ltsr-2 & 5; LRP
�2. Lt 22F; � Blk FA; AC
3. Ptn Lt 5; Blk 11; AC
5. Site Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1. 8. 0+ ackles
2. 1. 3 acres
3. 1. 0+ acres
6. Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1. RMF-16
2. CR
3. RSF-Y
7. General Plan Designation. . . . . 1. High Den. Multi-Family
2. Retail Commercial
3. Mod. Den. Single Family
•
8. Existing Use. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1. County Health Facility
2. Vacant Commercial Bldg.
3. Fire Station
9. Environmental Status. . . . . . . . .Negative Declaration posted
November 21, 1988
B. ANALYSIS:
There are three (3) sites within the City that have been used, or
are planned for future use, as government facilities that are not
properly designated on the City's Land Use or Zoning Maps. These
sites are: (1) the County Hospital property off Capistrano; (2)
the old "Benos" site on El Camino Real which is planned for a new
City Police facility; and (3) the City' s Fire Station #2 located
on West Front. As indicated above, these sites are currently
designated for residential or retail commercial use in the
General Plan and Zoning Ordinance.
Amendments to the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Maps for
these sites will not constitute substantive changes in the
General Plan' s Land Use Element. The suggested amendments are
seen primarily as "house keeping" items.
. Capistrano Site
The City of Atascadero has a long-term lease on the property
adjacent to the County' s health care facility on Hospital Drive
off Capistrano. The City acquired an interest in the property
when it appeared that this would be an appropriate site for a new
Police facility. Although the Police facility will not be
constructed on this property, analysis shows that use of the
property for high density multiple family (the currently allowed
use) is not appropriate. The property is relatively steep and
heavily wooded which renders it less than suitable for any type
of high density development.
An inspection of this property by the Community Development
Director and the Parks and Recreation Director suggested possible
use of the site as a satellite parking facility for a future
stadium park. In the past, the County has indicated a need for
additional parking to serve its facilities. This need could also
be partially satisfied by such a lot.
In addition to the property the City is leasing, the County' s
existing health facility is improperly designated and zoned.
This type of use fits within the "P" zoning district and Public
land use designations and not the high density multiple family
designations. If there is a need in the future to redevelop this
site for another use, the Public designation would not prejudice
2
0
future determinations as might the multiple family designation.
E1 Camino Real Site
The City has purchased the old "Benos" site at the intersection
of Rosario and E1 Camino Real for eventual development as a new
Police facility. To properly reflect the intended use of this
property, the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance should be
modified from the current Retail Commercial designations to
Public designations.
West Front Site
The site of Fire Station #2 on West Front is currently designated
for moderate density single family residential development. This
designation is not consistent with the site' s use for a public
facility. As with the Police facility site, this property should
be reclassified with a "Public" designation.
C. RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of General Plan Amendment 1B-89. The
Commission should recommend that the City Council adopt the
attached draft Resolution and Ordinance amending the General Plan
and Zoning Ordinance Maps.
SLD/
ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A: General Plan Map - Capistrano Site
Exhibit B: Zoning Map - Capistrano Site
Exhibit C: General Plan Map - El Camino Real Site
Exhibit D: Zoning Map - E1 Camino Real Site
Exhibit E: General Plan Map - West Front Site
Exhibit F: Zoning Map - West Front Site
Exhibit G: Public Zone Allowed Uses
Exhibit H: Draft Resolution
Exhibit I: Draft Ordinance
3
1
1 _
-�
Nook
■� r '" '� ■
:�/ � �'� � • ��,til
INN
i17,
�
oiler
1. • • •
•
111111111 111111/1/ ►_
FIR :i..
Y 1 �1 • �
1
S ,�♦ �►�', �� art ���•
`► AM
�� ■ ow '
1��■� 1111 x:11�►'tlliii�� ♦ � = -'
nnnnrt,►gym►,
=---RO WIN
111 r�
A
EXHIBIT F
CI Zoning Map
' OF ATASCADERO West Front Site
�N
loin 1 /97•-7
"-ST` COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT GF 1B-89 / ZC 1-89
DEPARTMENT
-;40001 �",X
f� •OS h
a
m-
5 �—
A4 _ R F•
SITE
9801 West Front
CT y ,
q Ci
ATq v c
v
AVE / v
-7
f�OgKb \
Ln
_ >\
Q co
r � �� 4�� � Oi Aq
EXHIBIT G
GP 1B-89/ZC 1-89
P (Public) Zone
9-3. 421. Purposes: This zone is established to provide suitable
locations and standards for the maintenance and development of
public and quasi-public facilities and services.
9-3. 422. Allowable Uses: The following uses shall be allowed in
the Public Zone. The establishment of allowable uses shall be as
provided by Section 9-2. 107 (Plot Plans) and Section 9-2. 108
(Precise Plans) :
(a) Broadcasting studios
(b) Libraries and museums
(c) Offices (City, County, State or Federal government or
public utilities
(d) Temporary offices (See Section 9-6.176)
(e) Public assembly and entertainment
(f) Schools (See Section 9-6. 125)
(g) Temporary events (See Section 9-6. 177)
(h) Temporary or seasonal retail sales (See Section 9-
6. 174)
(i) Outdoor recreation services
9-3. 423. Conditional Uses: The following uses may be allowed in
the Public Zone. The establishment of conditional uses shall be
as provided be Section 9-2. 109 (Conditional Use Permits) :
(a) Animal hospitals (See Section 9-6. 110)
(b) Caretaker residence (See Section 9-6. 104)
(c) Cemeteries
(d) Churches and related activities (See Section 9-6. 121)
(e) Collection station
(f) Funeral Services
(g) Health care services
i •
(h) Membership organizations
(i) Residential care
(j) Schools - business and vocational (See Section 9-6. 125)
(k) Single family residences
(1) Skilled nursing facility (See Section 9-6. 134)
(m) Social and service organizations
(n) Transit stations and terminals
(o) Utility service centers
9-3. 424. Lot Size: There shall be no minimum lot size in the
Pic—Zone..-, except for parcels intended for single family
residential use where the minimum lot size shall be 2 1/2 acres.
0 EXHIBIT H
• RESOLUTION NO. 3-89
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ATASCADERO APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE
LAND USE MAP OF THE LAND USE ELEMENT
OF THE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN
(GP 1B-89 CITY OF ATASCADERO)
WHEREAS, the City of Atascadero has grown considerably since
incorporation; and
WHEREAS, the City' s General Plan, which was prepared in the
1970' s and adopted in 1980 to guide the City' s general growth is
in need of updating; and
WHEREAS, there are publicly owned and utilized parcels of
land within the City that are not designated for public use on
the City' s General Plan Map; and
WHEREAS; the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero
conducted a public hearing on the subject amendment on January 3,
1989; and
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65356 provides that a
General Plan be amended by the adoption of a resolution; and
WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Atascadero finds as
follows:
1. The proposed General Plan amendment recommended by the
Planning Commission is consistent with the goals and
policies of the General Plan.
2. The proposed General Plan amendment will not have a
significant adverse affect on the environment. The
Negative Declaration prepared for the project is
adequate.
THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Atascadero does
resolve to approve General Plan Amendment GP 1B-89 as follows:
1. Amendment to the General Plan Land Use Element, Land
Use Map, as shown on the attached Exhibits A and B to
designate the affected parcels "Public" .
On motion by and seconded by
, the foregoing resolution is hereby
adopted in its entirety by the following roll call vote:
# !
Resolution # 3-89 .
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
DATE ADOPTED:
CITY OF ATASCADERO, CA
BONITA BORGESON, Mayor
ATTEST:
BOYD C. SHARITZ, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
RAY WINDSOR, City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
JEFFREY G. JORGENSEN, City Attorney
PREPARED BY:
HENRY ENGE , ConunuriTty Development Director
i
■v �,r_
= RM I
4:1L41 9
d MITIfill
fill
list III,
TWO
—
��
MW
Ma
•
�i
EXHIBIT B
CITY 9801 West Front
OF
� .,.. ... � ATASCADERO
a �:�•-7 Moderate Density Single
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Family to Public
„p DEPARTMENT
GP 1B-89
M.
/ o
S ., Q �S �J DEN ITY •
�Q � �r.
FA I L •
r i �R IAS • •
1 �rCl
p
.� SITE
P U
• '
• � DA
I ` GApE�
0 EXHIBIT I
ORDINANCE NO. 187
AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ATASCADERO AMENDING MAPS 6 AND 19 OF THE OFFICIAL ZONING
MAPS BY REZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTIES FROM THEIR CURRENT
DESIGNATIONS TO "P" (PUBLIC)
(ZC 1-89: City of Atascadero)
WHEREAS, the proposed zoning map amendments are consistent
with the General Plan as required by Section 65860 of the
California Government Code; and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendments are in conformance with
Section 65800 et seq. of the California Government Code
concerning zoning regulations; and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendments will not have a significant
adverse impact upon the environment. The Negative Declaration
prepared for the project is adequate; and
WHEREAS, the Atascadero Planning Commission held a public
hearing on January 3, 1989 and has recommended approval of a
portion of Zone Change 18-88.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Atascadero does
ordain as follows:
Section 1. Council Findings.
1. The proposal is compatible with the surrounding land
use and zoning.
2. The proposal is consistent with the General Plan
land use element.
3. The proposal will not result in any significant adverse
environmental impacts. The Negative Declaration
prepared for the project is adequate.
Section 2. Zoning Map.
Maps number 6 and 19 of the Official Zoning Maps of the
City of Atascadero on file in the City Community Development
Department are hereby amended to reclassify the parcels listed
below as and shown on the attached Exhibit A and B which are
hereby made a part of this ordinance by reference.
1. Lot 22F; Block FA; Atascadero Colony
2. Ptn. of Lot 5; Block 11; Atascadero Colony
Ordinance No. 187 .
Section 3. Publication.
The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published
once within fifteen (15) days after its passage in the Atascadero
News, a newspaper of general circulation, printed, published, and
circulated in the City in accordance with Section 36933 of the
Government Code; shall certify the adopting and posting of this
ordinance and shall cause this ordinance and this certification
together with proof of posting to be entered into the Book of
Ordinances of the City.
Section 4. Effective Date.
This ordinance shall go into effect and be in full force and
effect at 12: 01 a.m. on the 31st day after its passage.
On motion by and seconded by
the foregoing Ordinance is approved
by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
DATE ADOPTED:
By:
BONITA BORGESON, Mayor
City of Atascadero, California
ATTEST:
BOYD C. SHARITZ, City Clerk
RAY WINDSOR, City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
JEFFREY JORGENSEN, City Attorney
PREPARED BY:
HENRY ENGE , Commity Development Director
Iii' � ° • • ���/ � '�� �
0 MA
� ���� ,111H1111 111111111
NI■E 1111���i i►',tltii�� ' _ o
111111 1111111111 111111 -�' � �
In/.���\`
Oman
I g usp
A
••nisi ;
J
EXHIBIT B
9801 West Front
CITY OF ATASCADERO
RSF-Y to P
asrnn � COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT zC 1-89
LE�� K
606-\
i
�E 0
CD-
A AA-ar-4 ' 19 Fol
Q •
Q� O
0
SITE
T '
CT ,
4
ICR
4t4
r
C7VE
w PO
RCLE+ogKb -
I
A
�z
/0
r v - �u0.
•
MINUTES EXCERPT - PLANNING COMMISSION - JANUARY 3, 1989
3. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 1B-89 AND ZONE CHANGE 1-89:
Request initiated by City of Atasca ero for amendments
to the General Plan Land use and Zoning Ordinance Maps
for certain government owned properties. Said amend-
ments will change the current land use and zoning des-
ignations to "Public" designations. Subject sites are
located at 5575 Capistrano, 5505 E1 Camino Real, and
9801 West Front.
Mr. Engen referenced a letter received by the County
requesting a continuance for the 5575 Capistrano portion of
the application. The County is taking issue as it has
future hopes for sale of this property for future multi-fam-
ily
ultifam-
ily development. Mr. Engen noted the exhibit map has a
drafting error; the map should show the area encompassing
the hospital site and approximately one acre site (which was
once considered as a potential police station site) .
There was discussion concerning the appropriateness of
considering the 5505 E1 Camino Real and 9801 West Front
sites with the exclusion of the 5575 Capistrano site.
No public testimony was given.
MOTION: Made by Chairperson Lochridge, seconded by Commis-
sioner Luna and carried 5 :0 to eliminate the 5575
Capistrano site from the general plan and zoning
ordinance applications for consideration at this
time.
MOTION: Made by Commissioner Tobey, seconded by commis-
sioner Luna and carried 5 :0 to recommend approval
of land use amendments to the General Plan and
Zoning Ordinance to change the designation of the
5505 E1 Camino Real and 9801 West Front sites to
Public (P) designation.
PECEIVED
` COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO EC 3 0 19$g
bepaatmEnt of cjenEnal sepvices
COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA 03408 •(805)54y-520(1
DUANE 1'. I-FIB. DIRECTOR
December 30, 1988
Mr. Henry Engen, Community Development Director
City of Atascadero
P.O. Box 147
Atascadero, CA 93423
HAND DELIVERED
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 1B-89 AND ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION 1-89 (ITEM B.3. ON
PLANNING AGENDA DATED 1-3-89)
The County of San Luis Obispo owns land consisting of approximately 6.1 acres off
Capistrano in the City of Atascadero. This site referenced in a City of Atascadero
Planning Staff Report (Item B.3. ) is recommended for amendments to the General Plan
Land Use and Zoning Ordinance Maps.
The subject site was utilized by the County for many years as a hospital site and
is currently used to house North County Regional Offices for County Mental Health,
Social Services and Health Clinic. These regional services to the North County
residents are anticipated to continue in the future, but the long range plans will
most likely not have these services at this site. The County's probable long range
plan would consolidate services at the proposed North County Regional Center Site.
In 1986, the County, in good faith and as an act of mutual assistance and
cooperation, leased 1 .3 acres of the County site to the City of Atascadero for
fifty years, without cost, for a Police Station Facility. A portion of this lease
site is also the portion of the total Capistrano site containing steep areas that
were referenced in the City of Atascadero staff report as not suitable for high
density uses. The balance of the Capistrano site is very usable and the present
zoning does conform with surrounding uses in the area. County staff feels that the
in If the Board of Supervisors should elect to
resent zoning should stay tact.
P
P 9 Y
surplus and sell the subject property in the future, the present zoning will
facilitate the sale and conforming development that will occur after it is sold.
We question after all these years, why change the zoning now?
The County received the City of Atascadero Staff report for the above referenced
general plan amendment and zone change on December 28, 1988. This does not leave a
reasonable amount of time to deal with all the issues relevant to the action
proposed by the City of Atascadero on the subject property owned by the County. We
request that this action be continued until City and County staff can meet and
address the concerns of the County.
OCA Mr°� `Z
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Council January 24, 1989
VIA: Ray Windsor, City Manager
FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director "Ca
SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN CONFORMITY REPORT 3-88
BACKGROUND:
On January 3, 1989, the Planning Commission considered the above
referenced subject regarding the acquisition by the City of
certain real property located in the downtown area for develop-
ment and use as a parking lot. on a 7 :0 vote, the Commission
determined said property to be in conformance with the General
Plan as reflected in the attached staff report.
No public testimony was given.
RECOMMENDATION:
• Concur with Planning Commission' s recommendation that City' s pro-
posed acquisition of real property in the downtown area for
development and use as a parking lot is in conformance with the
General plan.
HE:pS
Attachment: Staff Report - January 3, 1989
•
CITY OF ATASCADERO Item: R_4 •
STAFF REPORT
FOR: Planning Commission Meeting Date: January 3, 1989
BY:f,oSteven L. Decamp, Senior Planner File No: GPCR 3-88
SUBJECT:
General Plan Conformity Report regarding the acquisition by the
City of certain real property located in the downtown area for
development and use as a parking lot.
BACKGROUND:
The California Government Code requires that a city not acquire
or dispose of any real property until the planning agency of
that city has reported on the conformity of the proposed
purchase or sale with that city' s adopted general plan (see
Exhibit A - Government Code Sec. 65402 (a) ) .
A. SITUATION AND FACTS:
1. Proponent. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .City of Atascadero •
2. Legal Description. . . . . . . . . . . .Lts. 23 & 24; Blk. MF; AC
3. Site Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0. 10 acres (4500 sq. ft. )
4. Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .CR (Commercial Retail)
5. General Plan Designation. . . . .Retail Commercial
6. Existing Use. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Vacant
7. Environmental Status. . . . . . . . .Categorically Exempt -
Class 1 (Future development
of a parking lot will be
subject to separate CEQA
review)
B. ANALYSIS:
A lack of adequate parking has been perceived as an impediment
to new development and redevelopment or renovation of existing
structures in the downtown area. Although informal surveys have
not revealed an areawide parking space deficiency, the on-site
parking requirements of the Zoning Ordinance do, in fact, inhibit
desirable development patterns in the downtown. Because lots in
the downtown area are generally small, the provision of on-site •
•
parking can reduce building sizes to unmarketable proportions in
addition to precluding the ability to build on the front property
line.
As an alternative to continued reliance on on-site parking, the
Business Improvement Association (BIA) has suggested that the
City purchase a lot in the downtown for development as a public
parking lot. Currently under consideration is a proposal for the
development of an in-lieu parking fee which would finance the
purchase and development of such a facility. This program would
allow a developer or business to "purchase" off-site parking
spaces in-lieu of providing parking on-site.
Several sites in the downtown area have been identified by the
BIA as being desirable for use as public parking lots in the
future. Early acquisition of two vacant lots located on Traffic
Way between Lewis Avenue and Palma is seen as timely and an
important first step in the parking program.
In the Land Use Element' s discussion of commercial uses, the
General Plan notes that " (o) ff-street parking in the Central
Business District is grossly inadequate. " Further in this
section, the Plan notes that one of the keys to optimum
commercial development is " . . . the provision of convenient and
adequate off-street parking. " There are, in addition, two policy
proposals that address parking in the downtown:
"1. Programs are needed to address traffic congestion,
pedestrian circulation and parking problems.
2. The downtown area shall be specifically planned for
human activity rather than car storage. Parking shall
be provided in lots that are convenient to commercial
uses. There shall be buffering and circulation
patterns within the total parking lot area. "
The Circulation Element of the General Plan also addresses
downtown parking concerns. The following excerpts are from that
element:
"Traffic circulation and attendant parking problems are
severe in the Central Business District north of Atascadero
Creek. "
"Off-street parking is currently required of any new
commercial construction. The more recently developed areas
of the Central Business District, namely from Atascadero
Creek south to the southern border of the Thrifty Drug
complex, have adequate off-street parking. But the core of
the Central Business District has severe parking problems. "
This section of the Plan continues to list several locations in
2
0 0
the downtown area which might be suitable locations for a parking
lot. Some of these sites may not be practicable alternatives
today, but the concept of public off-street parking in the
downtown area is still relevant. Although the site selected by
the BIA is not specifically listed in the Plan, its general
location and size suggests that its use as a parking lot would be
appropriate.
C. RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission determine that the
City's proposed acquisition of real property in the downtown area
for development and use as a parking lot is in conformance with
this City' s adopted General Plan.
ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A - Government Code Excerpt
Exhibit B - Location and Zoning Map
Exhibit C - General Plan Map
Exhibit D - Detail Map
3
EXHIBIT A
miss CITY OF
.. ATASCADERO Government Code Excerpt
_05CAD
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT GP Conformity Report 3-8f-
DEPARTMENT
-8fDEPARTMENT
65402. (a) If a general plan or part thereof
has been adopted, no real property shall be
acquired by dedication or otherwise for street,
square, park or other public purposes, and no
real property shall be disposed of, no street
shall be vacated or abandoned, and no public
building or structure shall be constructed or
authorized, if the adopted general plan or part
thereof applies thereto, until the location,
purpose and extent of such acquisition or
disposition, such street vacation or abandonment,
or such public building or structure have been
submitted to and reported upon by the planning
agency as to conformity with said adapted general
plan or part thereof. Zhe planning agency shall
render its report as to conformity with said
adopted general plan or part thereof within forty
(4 0) days after the matter was submitted to it,
or such longer period of time as may be
designated by the legislative body.
If the legislative body so provides , by
ordinance or resolution, the provisions of this
subdivision shall not apply to: (1 ) the
disposition of the remainder of a larger parcel
which was acquired and used in part for street
purposes; (2) acquisitions, dispositions, or
abandonments for street widening; or ( 3 )
alignment projects, provided such dispositions
for street purposes, acquisitions, dispositions,
or abandonments for street widening, or alignment
projects are of a minor nature.
` OM ■
/�� �� • WE
.� ♦ Ni��ii� • � .
op
o.��� X111 _��: ..�t •'-� �� ■ "' � '
rn
1 it
I�/ /III UUUU/UU /U�U/I �
all
111/� � ��� ,,• �;�a `�'�/
kdFtl'.
1
a � 1
MEETI 1f AQINDA2.
CAT 1TEMI
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: City Council Members
FROM: Ray Windsor, City Manager
SUBJECT: B.I.A. Property Acquisition
DATE: October 11, 1988
BACKGROUND
In accordance with my recommendation to you at your joint meeting
with the Planning Commission, I would like to move ahead with a
formal appraisal on the two lots identified in the attached memo
from Henry.
As indicated to you earlier, I believe it is in the best inter-
ests of the community to begin to improve portions of the
downtown and, even though this should not be done without a
comprehensive master plan, I don' t believe that the acquisition
of the parcels identified by .Henry will affect the outcome of
that planning process.
At your neat meeting, staff will be prepared to make recommen-
dations for the development of a master plan.
RECOMMENDATION
City Council authorize staff to obtain formal appraisals on lots
23 and 24 of Block MF in Atascadero Colony. 90-r -Ku � fj5ad
RW: cw
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Ray Windsor , City Manager
FROM : Henry Engen , Community Development Director - �
RE : Proposed B. I.A. Parking Lot
DATE: October 5, 1988
Parcels being proposed for acquisition as part of the beginnings
of a downtown parking program are Lots 23 and 24 of Block MF in
Atascadero Colony (see attached Assessor ' s Map) . Each lot is 30
feet wide and 75 feet deep for a total of 4500 square feet . It
i.s zoned CR (Retail Commercial ) .
HE:ps
Enclosure : Assessor ' s Map
Z TRAFFIC' WAY .4 t
2i. J /0 - -
'
ar -6J07''Sir Ul
$�2{Z}: ro •s
A ati7r o ao as r
ON 3
u263?
89 ° i s70 70 I S • .100 It y
z _ • ..
4 ENTRADA AVE. o
s:a•a7•w "' � s
DID
N A IT f
NN Ii.7J 70 70 75 100
.r.
ZE rn
- Z x . • NQ.r r -e42 �
. m a a zip �
V ` W
w 1
71.77 70 70 ` ZB��i '
i t
t 'Ji.j7--joJois
ry
Oo c O 'y
me073 .if GN/ •/17 . m ti
rc is = 15`/ �O• 893 =o 40
e t.7► 'Io NO 7I 17 _5
`v
Z 3
n
0
D N T p rn
A
4
O7 •a L_ O
m � m s:esrJ•w t
N o WEST -MALL o
2 0 W s A
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: City Council January 24, 1989
VIA: Ray Windsor, City Manager
FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director 116
SUBJECT: Appeal by Don Messer of the Community Development
Director's Denial of a Grading Permit for Hotel Park
(5805 Capistrano - next to Bank of America)
BACKGROUND:
On November 24, 1987 , a precise plan for a 69 ,696 square foot
office retail project comprised of ten buildings and a restaurant
was approved for this 6 .7 acre parcel (see attached precise plan
conditions) . Included in the requirements was a tree protection
plan. Subsequently, the applicant has applied for building
• permits for two buildings which have not been accepted for pro-
cessing pending issuance of an overall site grading permit.
In reviewing the proposed grading permit, staff decided to seek a
second opinion from Jack Brazeal, arborist, as to whether the
eight trees being proposed for retention would survive the site
improvements being proposed. As indicated in his analysis, he
does not believe so.
A meeting of the Council ' s tree subcommittee was held on December
8th, 1988 and the decision was to require conformance with the
originally approved precise plan calling for protection of these
trees . The applicant has, in his letter of December 15th,
appealed staff' s denial letter of December 9, 1988 to the City
Council .
The appellant has indicated that they are developing supporting
rationale for their appeal , and have requested a continuance to
your next Council meeting (February 14, 1989 ) .
ISSUE:
The issue before the council is whether a grading permit should
be issued on this site given a second arborist' s opinion that
tree protection measures being proposed would not spare the
trees . The secondary issue, albeit one receiving far more
• publicity, is the value attached to the trees . The current tree
ordinance would enable bonding in cases where there is a question
as to whether trees proposed for protection would survive the
development process . The value attached by Mr. Brazeal is $1 . 3
million for the eight trees in jeopardy. As we' ve noted in
r -
• •
•
communications with Mr. Messer, the question of bonding maximums
is a matter that is being discussed in the context of amendments
to the tree ordinance.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Continue the appeal to February 14, 1989 to permit receipt of
technical arguments from the appellant.
HE:ps
Enclosures : December 15, 1988 letter of appeal
January 6, 1989 letter relative to bonding
requirements
December 9, 1988 letter from Community Development
Director denying issuance of grading permit
December 1 , 1988 arborist report from Jack Brazeal
Heritage trees sketch plan and cross-sections
November 24, 1987 precise plan conditions
cc: Don Messer
Steve Sylvester
•
•
ADANISTRATION BUILDING
POST OFFICE BOX 747
ATASCADERO.CALIFORNIA 93423
PHONE: 18051 466-8000 POLICE DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE BOX 747
CITY COUNCIL $aseadei
� ATASCAOCALIFORNIA 93423
CITU CLERK
PHONE:
(BOSI 466.8600
CITY TREASURER �
CITY MANAGER 'k NCOR404�rORATED JULY 2, 1979
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 6005 LEWIS AVENUE
ATASCADERO.CALIFORNIA 93422
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT PHONE: (8051 466-2141
.r.
November 24, 1987
Mr. Don Messer
P.O. Box 1958
Atascadero, CA 93423
SUBJECT: Precise Plan 30-87
5805 Capistrano
Dear Mr. Messer: -
The City of Atascadero reviewed your application for a precise plan
and environmental determination for the construction of a 69, 696
square foot office/retail project comprised of ten (10) buildings, one
restaurant and site improvements. This review and approval includes
the requested adjustments, submittal of color boards and, as discussed
in previous meetings, revised conditions. A Negative Declaration has
been previously granted.
The proposed precise plan is approved as shown on attached Exhibit B
(site plan) , Exhibit C (fire hydrants) , and subject to the conditions
of approval listed in Exhibit F. Final approval becomes effective at
5:00 p.m. , December 8, 1987, unless appealed. (NOTE: THIS DOES NOT
CONSTITUTE A BUILDING OR GRADING PERMIT) .
In the event you intend to appeal any of the conditions, your appeal e
should be in writing and "should state the reasons for the appeal. Any
appeal would be scheduled for Planning Commission consideration as a
public hearing. You should, however, discuss any objections to the
conditions with the planning staff as it maybe possible to alter con-
ditions after such discussion.
r �
'*If you should have any questions concerning this project, you are wel-
come to contact the Community Development Department for assistance.
Sincerely,
Doug y
avidson
Associate Planner
City of Atascadero
DD:(eh
ccGary Swauger
Attachments: Exhibit A - Location Map
Exhibit B - Site Plan
Exhibit C - Required Fire Hydrants
Exhibit D - Development Statement
Exhibit E - Findings for Approval
Exhibit F - Conditions of Approval
- � i► ��• � 1 tl
all-
moll
14
jW
����■ ��� � Irl/�� .r � . ��j�.�
.�Aid�. . IN
40t MMt AI.?M A.tt.r.M an
tOrla:cmWICIal
rt111rIM Mr[uM: 70,lN M.n 17.n /
wam 414 Mlrew/r: amaOf 14.01. St.n
rrtmTS: t.nr"*:'IT': t.n
Mus ra Brun. ].IN 1 1.0 i ♦ /
lar wIMM.4.0.4.: u sf mii. /1.1t t
uawaa can I-- M.ur M.n. r.n ;
8VIl01NO OATAt
111111,on orpler van: op
10x4 rl•M;is ral0lmf t1 rN 10.07. n.No SO.".
OrrM noes M alul4M 4t Slat m.n. S1.1t0 sa.rt. j / , • -
Mn4Murs e0 !
•AIlKtNO DATA!- � / / � " � � _(r•a t..o«.tee«.
/t0!?Alum r•N-VMS
1 IWIrICAl!'N0•PACt1 Mn!'IONim /• / / '' ( '� , \• lR•.�'
�7 CO•IC? r•NP S"tu low ma; < b / '.[/ / �.•••.i•=:Y J ,"" 1• ti�
rau"114100 ARIA rM SPMl tM SIM411r1i„-J J: • , ,�: ;�•' • 1
iig
e r �,•n.moi +�,. __ ,:�`•`'':: - �' "'`I�• Q i
el
:.fib\ / j >y —_ .► •a.,:.a:• \
IS
.� P ... • A
bis f4
0: / l .4 7 i•. - r • \\��'•'\�'.:.�:: ►.... I
��aJ1 �./ es7 � l l - � wn.ena♦ems>.r� � /
QP
00
YA
I TNgEE` �/•
. �� _ •i /
r•<a to�..) y.
}
s�T� A�aN
___ EX H 19iT B
Stye OAT^, a'
LIT lu tfl.in ro./T.I.ro mm ! a
ro.IN:CO•[KNL A[Utl
e7tLDip t•.[Aul: L,f"11.01 17.77
rN[IN ND nlftWf71 lM,19/ro•R. 77.11 / /
10sn'.f71
KOtf AND lTAlp, iJro ro./T. I.S.
W9StA.In $11%ro.rt. N.K
"Plft"m AK.D.D.D.: N.l7f ro.R. 11.17
AFA1t7D[ro CNis e.14: ".In So.rT. D.0
8USLOING DATA:
OKI FLW4:ID Nttelos7 It nro so.". 11..90 Tt.R,
M•U rlDDa U teitel•Sf 1T 711[ro•R. SM":" / % / . ! �.
n7TAYDNt, / i / , T,
odm a.
PARKING DATA:-
IN ••'"� a,.,e t...•fe..,.
StN9A.0 f I.It'DACOi;= • 1.6
t DN9KN f'Ht'1•A[[f It"91 lDAD111tVACU
;••%/ :,�' ;,. .: '.: �,.'`.., 'x. 'i• .1 a,
ror•t v7as /.• .../ •;' ..��:- _�f�t•s7�.Y+ ,111: .1 a ,� '
Un7 WILelq NU M vAQ:iK so.R.RTAII - / i /. .'y,.f y r••'' •%: :(::.� 1`:•'," f I.. .'
it
10
IP I
is / / v i _-_ •r` r i° a �. �� -•':
NJ
• • , tx . � ',r.,. .> a •+. •j.- 1F r
vv
•�• '.;.'.'Ara tv�/ i �'� --_ .p �. � .>~.�i:�z.�''' ��• N _ i.
/
vv
TwgEE TMO OM "'(�
• i•J.•b•d..4D 4 1 !
- E X H !S iT C--_
R RE HYDRAIV r
1. 9ary swau michad Er architect i
9
HOTEL PARK and associates
DEVELOPER STATEMENT
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
HOTEL PARK BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL CENTER IS A FOUR PHASE RETAIL, OFFICE,
AND RESTAURANT COMPLEX CONSISTING OF ELEVEN BUILDINGS, TOTALLING 69,696
SQ.FT.ON A 291,780 SQ. FT. OR 6.70 AC. SITE.
PHASE ONE: FIVE TWO-STORY RETAIL AND OFFICE BUILDINGS OF 6072 SQ.FT.
EACH, TOTALLING 30,360 SQ.FT. ; COVERING 137,614 SQ.FT.OR 3.16 AC.
OF SITE AREA.
PHASE TWO: THREE TWO-STORY RETAIL AND OFFICE BUILDINGS OF 6072 SQ.FT.
EACH, TOTALLING 18,216 SQ.FT.; COVERING 56,589 SQ.FT. OR 1.3 AC.
OF SITE AREA. .
PHASE THREE:TWO TWO-STORY RETAIL AND OFFICE BUILDINGS OF 6072 SQ.FT.
EACH, TOTALLING 12,144 SQ.FT.; COVERING 72,464 SQ.FT. OR 1.66 AC.
OF SITE AREA.
PHASE FOUR: 300 SEAT ONE STORY RESTAURANT OF 8976 SQ.FT., COVERING
25,133 SQ.FT. OR .58 AC. OF SITE AREA.
ALONG WITH THE PRECISE PLAN APPLICATION, WE ARE SUBMITTING A PARCEL MAP TO
DIVIDE THE PROJECT INTO FOUR PARCELS. THE PARCEL LINES WILL GENERALLY
FOLLOW THE PHASING LINES. IT IS THE INTENT OF THE DEVELOPER TO FURTHER
SUBDIVIDE THE PROJECT INTO AIRSPACE CONDOMINIUMS, AT A LATER DATE, TO ALLOW
SEPARATE OWNERSHIP OF INDIVIDUAL SHOPS AND OFFICES. IT WOULD BE PREMATURE AT
THIS POINT TO APPLY FOR THE CONDOMINIUM, SINCE TENANTS HAVE NOT BEEN
DETERMINED AT THIS TIME.
PROJECT DESIGN:
THE SITE HAS EXISTING OR PROPOSED ROADS ON THREE SIDES, TOTALLING 66% OF THE
PERIMETER. THERE IS OVER 40 FEET OF ELEVATION CHANGE WITHIN THE SITE.
EVERY EFFORT HAS BEEN MADE TO SAVE THE EXISTING WHITE OAK TREES ON THE SITE,
AND TO MINIMIZE ALTERATION OF LANDFORMS. THE SIX TREES ALONG CAPISTRANO
AVENUE WILL HAVE TO BE REMOVED TO ACCOMODATE THE REQUIRED ROAD WIDENING.
ONLY FIVE TREES WITHIN THE PROJECT WILL HAVE TO BE REMOVED, WITH TWENTY-SIX
REMAINING.
post office box 1177 cambria california 93428 805 927 3987
h
2450 main suite c S8SO west mall
cambria californla atascadero california
80S 927 3987 SOS 466 0886
EXN ISIT D
DEV k)Lu PE Q_
STAT-E AA E ti T
ar mic architect
g y hae! swauger
and associates
HOTEL PARK
DEVELOPER STATEMENT PAGE 2
PARKING CALCULATIONS:
SINCE TENANTS - HAVE NOT BEEN DETERMINED AT THIS TIME, WE HAVE CALCULATED THE
PARKING BASED ON A MIX OF USES WITH HIGHER INTENSITIES THAN ANTICIPATED.
THIS WILL PROVIDE MORE PARKING THAN REQUIRED BY CITY ORDINANCES.
BUILDINGS 1-10: LOWER FLOOR
THREE EATING AND DRINKING ESTABLISHMENTS AT 740 SQ.FT. EACH, 2220
SQ.FT. TOTAL.
25% KITCHEN=555 SQ.FT. AT 100 SQ.FT./SPACE 6 SPACES
75% EATING 1665 SQ.FT. AT 60 SQ.FT./SPACE 28 SPACES
EMPLOYEES=27 TABLES AT 6 TABLES/SPACE 6 SPACES
THREE FOOD AND BEVERAGE SALES AT 740 SQ.FT. EACH, 2220 SQ.FT.
TOTAL.
2240 SQ.FT. AT 200 SQ.FT./SPACE 12 SPACES
SEVENTY FOUR GENERAL MERCHANDISE SHOPS AT 740 SQ.FT. EACH, 25,160
SQ.FT. TOTAL.
25,160 SQ.FT. AT 350 SQ.FT./SPACE 72 SPACES -
SUB-TOTAL 124 SPACES
• BUILDINGS 1-10: UPPER FLOOR
FORTY OFFICES AT 778 SQ.FT. EACH, 31,120 SQ.FT. TOTAL.
40 OFFICES AT 2 SPACES/OFFICE 80 SPACES
RESTAURANT:
8896 SQ.FT. TOTAL, 33% KITCHEN AREA, 67% DINING AREA
2962 SQ.FT. KITCHEN AT 100 SQ.FT./SPACE 30 SPACES
6014 SQ.FT. DINING AT 20 SQ.FT./SEAT=300 SEATS
300 SEATS AT 1 SPACE/4 SEATS 75 SPACES
EMPLOYEES: 75'TABLES AT 6 TABLES/SPACE 13 SPACES
SUB-TOTAL 118 SPACES
TOTAL 322 SPACES
THE SHARED ON-SITE PARKING ADJUSTMENT AS PER 9-4.115(f) ALLOWS A REDUCTION
OF 20%. THIS WOULD REDUCE THE REQUIRED PARKING TO 258 SPACES. THE PROJECT
PROVIDES 266 SPACES. WE ARE REQUESTING THE 20% PARKING ADJUSTMENT.
post office box 1177 cambria california 93428 805 927 3987
2450 main suite c 5850 west mall
Cambria california atascadero california
805 927 3987 805 466 0886
EX I BIT D
EXHIBIT E - FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL
Precise Plan 30-87
5805 Capistrano (Messer/Swauger)
1. The proposed project or use is consistent with the General Plan.
2. The proposed project or use satisfies all applicable provisions of
this Title.
3. The establishment, and subsequent operation or conduct of the use
will not, because of the circumstances and conditions applied in
the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety or wel-
fare of the general public or persons residing or working in the
neighborhood of the use, or be detrimental or injurious to prop-
erty or improvements in the vicinity of the use.
4. The proposed project or use will not be inconsistent with the
character of the immediate neighborhood or contrary to its orderly
development.
5. The proposed use or project will not generate a volume of traffic
beyond the safe capacity of all roads providing access to the pro-
ject, either existing or to be improved in conjunction with the
project, or beyond the normal traffic volume of the surrounding
neighborhood that would result from full development in accordance
with the Land Use Element.
6. The appearance of the project is in compliance with the City' s
Appearance Review Guidelines.
EXHIBIT F - CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Precise Plan 30-87
5805 Capistrano (Messer/Swauger)
1. All construction shall be in conformance with Exhibit B (site
plan) , Exhibit C (fire hydrants) , Exhibit F (conditions of ap-
proval) , and shall comply to all applicable City codes and ordin-
ances. Any modification to this approval shall be approved by the
Community Development Department prior to implementing any
changes.
2. Complete landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to, and
subsequently approved by, the Community Development Department,
prior to issuance of building permits (Section 9-4.124) . The fol-
lowing items shall be noted or detailed on these plans:
a. All areas including setbacks, parking lots, and unused areas
shall be landscaped appropriately (Section 9-4.125 (a) ) .
b. Concrete curbing, or a functional equivalent, shall be pro-
vided to enclose all required landscaping.
C. All existing trees with a diameter of eight (8) inches or
more shall be shown. Trees which are to be removed shall be
noted as such. A tree protection plan, including fencing and
other necessary measures to protect existing oaks, shall be
submitted for approval by the Community Development Depart-
ment prior to the issuance of a building permit.
d. Proposed landscaping shall be accompanied with a planting
schedule which includes species, container sizes, number of
plants or flats, and the space distribution of ground cover.
Replacement oak trees shall be planted along the extension of
Highway 41.
e. Ten percent (10%) of the parking area shall be landscaped
with shade trees approximately 30 feet on center.
f. Five (5) foot of landscaped area with six (6) foot fencing is
required along the northeasterly property line.
g• Where parking spaces are arranged to head toward a street, a
three (3) foot high landscaped berm is required.
3. One (1) trash enclosure for each phase shall be provided with ap-
propriate details (Section 9-4. 129) as shown on Exhibit B. Please
note that the construction standards require the bottom of the
trash enclosure area to be concrete or an equivalent impervious
material. Trash facilities shall be integrated into the design of
the building (s) that they serve.
4. Three (3) fire hydrants shall be installed at the locations desig-
"*
nated in Exhibit C, prior to combustible construction occurring
on-site.
S. A grading and drainage plan prepared by a registered civil en-
gineer shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development
and Public works Departments prior to the issuance of building
permits. These plans shall include the following:
a. Soils report
b. Earthwork quantity
C. Retaining walls to be coordinated with future Highway 41 im-
provements.
d. Measures to reduce velocity of water and erosion on and off
the site.
All grading/drainage work is to be completed prior to final build-
ing inspection.
6. Structural plan check will occur during building permit process-
ing, however, the following preliminary items have been noted:
a. Four foot deck cannot project into the ten (10) foot setback
(unless non-combustible) .
b. One (1) hour protection is required for walls less than 20
feet from property line.
C. Some buildings maybe classified as three (3) story.
7. The submitted plans are generally in compliance with the City's
Appearance Review Guidelines with the exception of the following:
a. Mechanical equipment is to be screened including: roof-
mounted, PG&E facilities, and trash enclosures.
b. A master signage plan requires approval prior to issuance of
sign permits. Projects with over 1400 square feet of signage
require a conditional use permit.
C. Provision of outdoor public seating areas.
d. Elevation or cross-section showing landscaping in relation to
buildings.
e. Exterior lighting is not shown.
8. A 1216" setback is required along full Highway 41 property front-
age.
9. Two hundred sixty-six (266) parking spaces shall be provided. The
slope of the parking area cannot exceed 7%. This includes the
granting of an 18% parking adjustment and a parking area slope
adjustment to exceed 5%. No further adjustments shall be granted.
j
I
10. A traffic report shall be prepared, supplemental to the ARE, Inc.
Atascadero Creek Bridge study (November, 1987) . The report shall
analyze the traffic impacts generated by this project and present
recommendations for mitigation measures, if necessary. Special
attention will be given to the Santa Ysabel/Highway 41 intersec-
tion, the Capistrano/Lewis Avenue intersection, and the Capis-
trano/West Mall intersection.
11. The applicant shall obtain an encroachment permit from Caltrans
for work within their right-of-way. Caltrans shall verify that
plans are compatible with plans for Highway 41, including 28 foot
wide access drives.
12. Applicant shall obtain a sewer connection permit from the Public
Works Department prior to hooking up to the public sewer. Appli-
cant shall pay all sewer fees in effect at the time of obtaining
permits for sewer service and fees in effect at time of connec-
tion.
13. Applicant shall obtain an encroachment permit from the Public
Works Department and sign an inspection agreement and a curb and
gutter agreement, guaranteeing that the work will be done and in-
spections paid for, prior to issuance of a building permit, and
construct improvements as directed by the encroachment permit
prior to final building inspection.
14. Road improvement plans, including drainage, prepared by a regis-
tered civil engineer, shall be submitted to and approved by the
Community Development and Public Works Departments prior to issu-
ance of building permits for Phase I, unless otherwise specified.
These plans shall include :
a. Curb, gutter, five (5) foot sidewalk, and 20 foot paveout
from centerline on Lewis Avenue (South Mall Extension) . Con-
struction of Lewis Avenue (South Mall Extension) shall term-
inate at the northwesterly curb return of the Capis-
trano/Lewis Avenue (South Mall Extension) intersection. Fu-
ture construction shall be bonded fc�r west of the above term-
ination and shall eventually terminate easterly of the exist-
ing creek tributary to Atascadero Creek, and the profile of
Lewis Avenue (South Mall Extension) will be established ade-
quate to provide transition to the proposed bridge crossing .
The easterly termination shall match the westerly termination
of the Bank of America development of Lewis Avenue (South
Mall Extension) .
b. Construction of Capistrano within new alignment, as
determined by the City Engineer . This shall include curb,
gutter and sidewalk on the easterly side of Capistrano along
property frontage, as well as a pedestrian linkage with the
Atascadero Creek bridge. Pedestrian access is also needed
from Lewis Avenue (South Mall Extension) to Highway 41 by the
addition of an on-site sidewalk parallel to the primary pro-
ject access on Lewis Avenue (South Mall Extension) .
. 4
c. The possible reconstruction of vertical curve on Capistrano
as determined by the City Engineer. The vertical curve on
Capistrano will be evaluated to satisfy a 30 mph design speed
and a stop condition at Lewis Avenue.
d. Future road improvements for Highway 41 shall be compatible
with approved highway plans as determined by Caltrans. These
shall include curb, gutter, and sidewalk, and refer to the
Caltrans plans showing the required left-turn channelization.
Prior to issuance of permits for Phase III development, these
highway plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City and
Caltrans.
e. Road improvements for all three street frontages shall in-
clude provisions for street trees. Construction of road im-
provements shall be completed (or bonded for) prior to the
final building inspection for Phase I , with the exception of
the required Highway 41 improvements which shall be completed
(or bonded for) prior to final building inspection for Phase
III.
15. The applicant shall make the following offers of dedication:
a. Offer of dedication on Capistrano Avenue as shown on map, and
as determined by the City Engineer.
b. Additional offer of dedication on Capistrano at frontage of
proposed Parcel A as determined by the City Engineer .
C. A six (6) foot public utility easement along full frontage of
Lewis Avenue (South Mall Extension) and Highway 41.
d. An open space easement dedication along the creek to the west
side of new alignment of Capistrano.
e. All offers of dedication shall be completed and recorded
prior to or simultaneously to finallbuilding inspection.
16. Each phase shall meet all development standards of the Zoning Or-
dinance including access, parking, landscaping, and trash enclo-
sure. The phasing of public improvements shall also be provided
to ensure that each phase functions independently. Phase II de-
velopment requires provision of an additional access drive, either
by connection with the Bank of America parking lot or future High-
way 41.
F�
i
17. The road abandonment (portion of Capistrano remaining after re 10
alignment) shall be recorded prior to issuance of permits for
Phase I.
18. All development fees in effect at the time of issuance of permits
will be paid by the applicant, and any credits will be determined
as per ordinance.
19. All existing and new utilities shall be placed underground. All
relocation and/or alteration of existing utilities shall be the
responsibility of the developer at his sole expense.
20. This precise plan is approved for a period of one year from the
date of final approval. (December 8, 1987) . Where a project phas-
ing schedule has been approved, construction permits shall be ob-
tained and substantial work shall be performed on at least one
approved building within that one year period. Construction must
continue at a reasonable pace with no interruption greater than
180 consecutive days.
1Y Ce
JACK ERAZE,L cERrzFM9) ARBORIST
4531 SKI 3XX LANE MCISA #163
PASO ROEUM, CALMFCF JIA, 93446 805/227-6140
December 1 , 1988
Doug Davidson
Community Development Department
City of Atascadero
Atascadero, California 93422
RE: Arborist tree preservation report for:
Hotel Park Carmercial Center
Atascadero, California 93422
Dear Mr. Davidson,
After a site inspection and extensive review of the plans for this project,
it is my opinion that the majority of the trees proposed to be retained on
this site cannot be preserved due to the plan design. The existing trees
on this site could not survive the cuts and fills proposed. I highly
recommend that this plan be rejected completely. In order for the pre-
servation and guaranteed survival of these trees, no cut or fill would
be permitted within more than 25% of the dripline. I recommend that a
tree preservation plan be drafted prior to a development plan, and that
the majority and the best specimen trees be given priority over develop-
ment.
(cont'd next page)
ARS REPCRT .TACK EPMZEAL
DHC 1 , 1988
This may not appear to be economical to the owner or developer, but
considering the value of these trees, it may have a significant impact
on their opinicn. For your information, I will evaluate all the trees
impacted by this proposed project so that you may forward this in-
formation to the owner or developer:
Diameters of trees in sections:
(A) 42" (B) 36'1. (C) 36" (D) 60" (E) 36" (F) 40" (G) 42" & 22"
The basic value is: $2,597,710.50 less other factors of 50% _
$1,298,855.20 tree value.
Other trees proposed for removal are as listed and diameters are:
26", 4211, 36", 42", 2411, 2411, 36", 1111, 3811, 4811, 3611, 12"
The basic value = $3,094,434.90 less 50% - $1,547,217.40 tree value
Trees indirectly impacted are listed and their diameters are:
36", 36", 36", 42", 22", 34", 20", 42", 24", 3211, 1811, 1411, 1411,
2411, 32" and the basic value is $4,487,147.20 less 50% =
$2,243,573.60 tree value.
Ccmbined value of all existing trees on this site = $5,089,646.20 x
100 years of life expectancy at the normal inflation rate.
ck Brazeal, borist Date
JB:-1.)b
may/ // ��'•A4 :nl. /t•„� ..,. a. __ _ <!'`\ /,
��•_� _ ";Ak
- T
y �
i�
O rP
w
HERITAGE TREES-7
TO BE PROTECTED
SEE SECTION PET-AILS
��•�►���.•v� .� .- �
•.✓,�, NORTH COAST ENGIN .108 JG, INC. SHEET No. of
715 24th Street 0
PASO ROBLES, CALIFOR 93446 CALCULATED 8Y DATE
(805) 239-3127
CHECKED BY DATE
SCALE
_........... ...
.. .i._----- _....... ... ... ... .... ....
_ ,
42 ,pA�
._�.._... x._._..... ... .. .. .- ... : ...
r .t .. .. ... _......
_........ .........--,.__-_, Q _
� v
eY ............ �_, .....3'i.. . ._�_. . D¢ivEwA�_... ...... __ ...... _....
I nu.
�F ......
t-
............ .................f_...............
.. SEG f�
......... .._. _. ...... .. �.. _.. ...... .....
_.. .. ............. ...
........ .4
. .
L,Exrr.�rza�Na
...
8.7p ....._............:......
...:.._
... ; . _.,...
...
�... ........ "014K
_ GJ7
Ex •Coaa,
1161
N 0 V 21 1988
CC:y'l;Li I:,r
PM=ml 3 IK wo.Mm 01411.
Lr
JOB rI`�� 7 v
NORTH COAST ENGINe. G, INC. SHEET NO. OF
715 24th Street S0
lmw
PASO ROBLES, CALIFOR 93446 CALCULATED BY DATE
(805) 239-3127
CHECKED BY DATE
SCALE
}
1 ......... ... .. ..... .._
�r
.....
'...... ... .
1 6t wQvJ
._.
iL-
L / _
- . - .._... . __. ... .. -- ---
.. .., . ....
._. _ _ ..._. _ _ _ ...
.......T ....._ _ _.......
�---
1 .... . ... ......
. .. .... 1�oa>=
�. .._ ... . .... . . ..:
Il
.
pAfzt'hk cr
ZavG.. �i�St+ED GRPrD
8 ;... ...... ..... _
WRtit-
5 EG _
�O" Oq l _.
GRCUND B0.
, 2
FF
MOM MI NcS3 IK.GO*.Wa 0101.
JOB r "�-r/Cy i ✓y
• - NORTH COAST ENGIN '11G, INC. SHEET NO. OF
715 24th Street 0 w
PASO R0BLES, CALIFOR 93446 CALCULATED BY DATE
(805) 239.3127
CHECKED BY DATE )
SCALE
6x GPi4Dg ..
_._
8�3 _ _ ... .. ...
......
")I11Cf ZONAO-8 'M Ciaan,Man 01471.
ADMINISTRATION BUILDING
taseade�®
6500 PALMA AVENUE
ATASCADERO,805) 46 -8093422 POLICE DEPARTMENT
PHONE: CALIFORNIA(805) 466-8000 INCORPORATED JULY 2, 1979
6500 PALMA AVENUE
CITY COUNCIL ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA 93422
CITY CLERK PHONE: (805)466.8600
CITY TREASURER
CITY MANAGER
��.-.
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 6005 LEWIS AVENUE
ATASCADERO,CALIFORNIA 93422
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT PHONE: (805) 466-2141
December 9, 1988 �.
Mr. Don Messer
P.O. Box 1958
Atascadero, Ca. 93423
SUBJECT: Issuance of Grading Permit
5805 Capistrano Ave. (Hotel Park)
Dear Mr. Messer:
We have received and reviewed your request for a grading permit
at the above-referenced site. Our determination is that the
proposed grading plan does not conform to the approved Precise
Plan, and thus, cannot be approved.
Precise Plan 30-87 included approval for tree removal and
required protection for the trees to remain as shown on the site
plan. At City expense, a second certified arborist was hired to
analyze the impact of the proposed grading on the trees to be
protected. In his opinion, "the majority of trees proposed to be
retained on this site cannot be preserved due to the cuts and
fills proposed. " The project development was approved on the
basis of these trees remaining and condition #2c. was imposed to
ensure this.
Condition #5 required approval of an engineered grading and
drainage plan prior to issuance of building permits. The Precise
Plan is a conceptual approval; an environmental determination
which considers the effects of a project on surrounding property.
The detailed review of grading/drainage plans, tree protection
methods, and planting materials are undertaken during building
permit plan check.
This decision may be appealed to the City Council upon receipt of
a written request accompanied by a $100 fee. A revised site plan
proposing removal of oak trees in excess of 20 inches in diameter
also requires approval from the City Council. Alternatively, you
may wish to develop modifications to the site plan to assure
preservation of those trees.
If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please
call the office for assistance.
Sincerely,
Henry Engen
Community Development Director
DD.-6)
cc: North Coast Engineering
RECEIVEO DEC 1 51988
DON MESSER CONSTRUCTION
POST OFFICE BOX 1958
ATASCADERO, CA 93423
805-466-0549
City of Atascadero
6500 Palma Avenue
Atascadero, CA 93422
Attn: Henry Engen - Planning Director
Dear Henry:
The Hotel Park group has tried for the past several months to
obtain a grading permit for Hotel Park at 5805 Capistrano next of Bank of
America. We have resubmitted our plans numerous times in an attempt to
comply with your plan checks, corrections and conditions of approval.
We now find it necessary to appeal your denial of a grading permit
to the City Council at the earliest convenient date.
We have several businesses ready to occupy Phase 01 of this
previously approved project and need to proceed with this project
as soon as possible.
If you have any additional questions, please feel free to contact
me.
Thank you for your time.
Best Regards,
A�
Don Messer
�
DON MESSER CONSTRUCTION RECEIVED JAN 6
P.O. Box 1958
Atascadero, CA 93423
(805) 466-0549
Henry Engen-City Planning Director
Atascadero City Council
Planning Commission
These two reports indicate the discrepancy between the Paso Robles published
tree value chart and the report recently paid for by the city of Atascadero on the
Hotel Park Project.
According to the Paso Robles report, the same eight trees that were valued at
$1,300,000., after a fifty percent reduction for condition, would be worth
$139,000. using the same fifty percent.condition reduction.
That much variation clearly explains our concerns about the proposed bonding
requirement and the wording in the tree ordinance.
A $1,300,000. bond would be impossible to obtain without putting up cash.
A $139,000. bond would be prohibitive and expensive. Bonds that require the
bonding company to provide their cash instead of using the funded cash for a
project are almost impossible to obtain, and if available, require security of twice
the bond amount. Most of us don't have the capability of providing excessive bonds.
A typical performance bond for roads or other offsite improvements is secured by:
1. The value of the project that benefits from the improvements.
(A completed subdivision is considerablely more valuable than new
1 and).
2. The loan on the property to make required improvements.
3. The credibility of the developer.
A bond that guarantees the value of the trees does not provide improvements that
increase the value of the property-infect-often the land used by the trees reduces
the building density value of the land.
A large tree could occupy 10,000 square feet of land from drip line to drip line and
at $10 per square foot equals $100,000. worth of buildable land. At some point
economics must be considered or property will be rendered useless by excessive
fees and requirements.
Sincerely,
Don Messer
••. ` .�l, .� � --. �,1i�U1. c� raw uC-nv�u�► . . . - --- -- ----••�..
r Rayy a.. � ,•A.
VALUE OF. OAK TREES
RECOMMENDED BY THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ARBORICULTURE ,
f-.
.f•r+
TOTAL
:i TRUNK CROSS CONDITION BASIC VALUE -
FACTOR VALUE
(INCHES) tSQ. IN.) W WSQ. IN.) M
6 28 100 $ 27.00 * $ 756.
50 100 27.00 * 11350.
8 '�•;
79 100;:' 27.00 * 2;133.
10 3 051 .
12 113 - 100 : 27.00 * , ,.
14 154
•100 27.00 * 4,158. .
16 201 100: 27.00 5,427. ;
27.00 * 61858.
:i 18 254 100 2700 * 8,478.
20 314 too.. . .
380 100':, . 27.00 * 10',260.
22 452 ' 0 �.. 27.00 * 129204. •.::r
24 lU
6 ~ 100..' 27.00
2 531 * 14,33:
` 26 616 : 100 ,: 27.00 * 16,632..
30 707 100 27.00 * 19,089.
32 804 100 27.00 * 21 ,708.
34 908 100 27.00 * 24,516. .
1018 100 27.00 * 27,486.
{ 36 100 27.00 * 30,618.
J8 1134
j 40 1257 100 . 27.00 * 33,939. '
42 1385 100 27.00 * 37,395.
! 44 1520 100 27.00 * 41 ,040.
46 1662 100 27.00 * 44,874.
48 1810 27.00 * 48,870.
100
_ • '' 27.00 * 53,028.
50 1964 100
1. 52 2124 100 27.00 * 57,348. f
54 2290 100 27.00 * 61 ,830.
_=
56 2463 100
•27.00 * 66,501 .
58 2642 100 27.00 * 71 ,334.
27.00 76,329.
60 28/ 100
* 1988 AdJusted Value
1
M E M O R A N D U M •
DATE: 1/17/89
TO: City Council
VIA: Ray Windsor, City Manager
FROM: Mike Hicks , Fire Chief
SUBJECT: Storm damage clean-up
Background
On 12/15/88 , the City of Atascadero experienced an unusual snow
storm which caused a great deal of damage to trees ( fallen trees ,
broken branches, etc . ) . The Atascadero City Fire Department has
concern over this fuel being added to the present fuel bed, and
feels that where possible this fuel should be disposed of .
We have tried to obtain State funds through the Office of
Emergency Services and have been denied, as this would be dealing
with a future problem (wildland fire) and not an immediate threat
to life or property. With the denial of State emergency funds,
it is most likely going to become the burden of local government •
and property owners to deal with the problem.
Recommendation
It is my recommendation that property owners accept the
responsibility for clean-up since there are no outside funds
available . The property owner has the following options
available for disposal :
1 ) Cut, pile and burn, in accordance with City backyard
burning regulations ( see attached) .
2 } Haul to landfill .
3 ) Chip and haul to landfill, or mulch.
4 ) City weed abatement program. This option would be very
expensive to the property owner as City weed abatement
is done during the time of year when burning would not
be permitted and hauling would be the best alternative .
T20
I would further iYecommend the e of Youth Authority anU
California Conservation Corp crews to clean debris in the public
right-of-way and creeks . This program would be administered
through the Public Works Department. An equipment repair fund of
$3 , 000 . 00 would be required for the project .
MIKE HICKS
t/
MEETIN faENDA2DA Ma .._1_.
•
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: City Council
FROM: Ray Windsor, City Manager r
SUBJECT: Storm Damage Clean-up ,, AN
DATE: January 24 , 1989
This memo is intended to supplement the attached report from
Chief Hicks .
I concur, as does the City Attorney, with the recommendation as
stated, but I would like to add some thoughts which lead up to
our conclusion.
• As a result of the last Council meeting, we were asked to esti-
mate the cost to the City to implement a clean-up program to
remove fallen branches and other combustible debris created by
the storm. Unfortunately, without exhaustive lot-by-lot surveys ,
it is virtually impossible to come up with an accurate figure.
But, our best guess is that it' s somewhere in the neighborhood of
$50, 000-$100, 000, assuming that the City would accept total res-
ponsibility for renting various equipment (primarily chippers,
bucket and dump trucks, etc. ) and providing necessary manpower
(C.C.C. , Youth Authority, etc . ) . Such monies are, of course, not
readily available and would be a severe drain on our reserves .
Perhaps the key factor in our recommending that private property
owners be responsible for their own lots is the fact that, sub-
sequent to the last Council meeting, we determined that the dump,
which we had been told would not accept this kind of material ,
will accept such. Further, burning restrictions are perhaps not
going to be as severe as we had originally thought. So, together
these new measures can assist the property owner' s flexibility in
this clean-up. Beyond that, we are concerned that, without a
mass informational campaign (mailing of flyers, door-to-door
contact, etc . ) , many property owners will not know of the pro-
gram. As a result, some people would not take advantage of
assistance, thus creating inequities in the use of public funds .
Finally, of course, is the whole question of liability on private
property, which could be a logistical headache when attempting to
• use or explain hold-harmless agreements , etc .
RW: cw
w,.
L �>
ATASCADERO CITY FIRE DEPARTMENT
Backyard burning regulations
1. Backyard burning will be limited to natural wastes from
shrubbery and trees grown on property occupied bj- one or two
family dwellings. Material to be burned will be free of
household rubbish, lumber, rubber, plastics, tar, paint,
creosote, hydrocarbons or any man-made waste.
2. Burning may take place only on permissive burn days as
established by the California Air Resources Board and the
San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control District.
Residents may call 466-0770 any day from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00
p.m. for burn day status.
3. Only dry shrubbery and tree prunings shall be burned.
Materials must be dry and reasonably free of dirt and
surface moisture. No burning of grass, weeds or piled
leaves is allowed on any day. A minimum of three (3) weeks
from the time of cutting will be required for drying.
4. No burning will be allowed if measurable rain has fallen
within five (5) days.
5. Piles must be smaller than four (4) feet high and six (6)
feet in diameter, and must be tended by an adult at all
times. A water hose is to be available.
6. Fires must be located a minimum of fifty (50) feet from
neighboring residences.
7. Burning shall be restricted to the hours between 10:00 a.m.
and 4:00 p.m.
These rules apply within the City of Atascadero and will be in
effect until further notice and may be cancelled or revised at
any time due to hazardous weather conditions.
Strict compliance with all the above rules will be enforced.
Maximum penalties for violation of Air Pollution Control District
Rules and Regulations are $1, 000 per day per violation and six
(6) months in jail .
Information regarding this program may be obtained from the Air
Pollution Control District at 549-5912 or from the Atascadero
Fire Department at 466-2141 during normal business hours (8:00
a.m. to 5:00 p.m. , Monday through Friday) .
i
M
ITEM
I
• I MEMORANDUM MEEM,//pAGENDA
AT1"�' ITEMI
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
Through: Ray Windsor, City Manager
From: Paul,M. Sensibaugh, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
s
Subject : Ordinance 183 Ammending Sections of Chapter 12
(Ordinance 119, Development Fees)
Date : December 12, 1988
Recommendation:
Staff recommends that Council adopt Ordinance 183 .
Background:
Resolution 100-88 recently established new development fees on
the basis of Ordinance 119 . Ordinance 119 refers to sections of the
• 50c Tax ordinance that must be added to Ordinance 119 prior to tree
repeal of the 50c Tax ordinance .
Discussion:
Ordinance 183 adds the definitions and exemptions contained in
Ordinance 111 , the 50c Tax ordinance, to the Development Fee
Ordinance 119 (Chapter 12, Article 3 of the City Code) .
Additionally, the new ordinance allows the use of non-residential
fees, as well as residential fees , for parks and recreation
facilities . The only other change is the deletion of the reference
to the school development fee .
After the second reading, staff will be submitting the repeal
for several ordinances and resolutions associated with the old
development fees .
Fiscal impact :
This is a procedural step that must be taked to maintain the
development fee revenue collections .
•
•
ORDINANCE NO. 183
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12 . ARTICLE 3 OF THE CITY
OF ATASCADERO CODE RELATING TO DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES.
The Council of the City of Atascadero does ordain that Article
3 of Chapter 12 of the Atascadero Municipal Code is hereby amended as
follows :
SECTION 1_
Section 3-12 . 03 DEFINITIONS :
The following terms shall have the following_ meanina_ s when used in
this Chapter .
The following definitions to be added to Section 3-12 . 03
(h) "Building" : means any structure having a roof supported
by columns and/or walls and intended for shalter , housing, and/�
enclosure of any person , animal or chattel , but not including ten
or mobile homes .
(i) "Building Permit" : means a buiilding permit for.
residential , non-residential , or mobile home site development applied
for to the Community Development Department of Atascadero on or after
the effective date of this Ordinance .
(i) "Construct" "Construction" as used in this Chapter means
the putting together, assembling, erection or altering of
construction materials components , or modules into a structure , or
portion of a structure, and includes restructuring. enlarging or
altering any structure . "Construct" also includes the moving from
outside the City and locating of a building, or portion thereof , onto
a lot or parcel of land, and also includes the improvement of land as
a mobile home lot .
(k) "Dwelling Unit" means an independent , attached or
detached residential building designed to house and provide living
space including kitchen and bathroom facilities , for an individual
family .
(1) "Gross Building Area" means the total floor area of each
floor of all buildings subject to this ordinance. including internal
circulation , storage and equipment space , as measured from the
outside faces of the exterior walls , including halls , lobbies•
stairways , elevator shafts , enclosed porches and balconies .
0 0
(m) "Mobile Home" means a vehicle without self-propulsion
designed and equipped as a dwelling unit to be used with a
foundation .
(n) "Mobile Home Lot" , as used in this Chapter , means any
area or portion of a lot designated, designed, or used for the
occupancy of one (1) mobile home on a permanent basis .
(o) "Non-Residential" includes all uses of land other than
residential including agricultural , communication, cultural .
educational , recreation , manufacturing, processing, resource
extraction , retail trade , services , transient lodging, transportation
and wholesale trade uses .
(p) "Person" includes anv individual , firm, co-partnership,
corporation , company , association , joint stock association , city,
county, state or district : and includes any trustee, receiver,
assignee , or other similar representatives thereof ,
(q) "Structure" as used in this Chapter means any artifact
constructed or erected, the use of which requires attachment to the
ground, including any building, but not including fences or walls six
feet or less in height .
(r) As used in this Chapter , the terms "residential . "
"commercial , " "office , " "industrial . " "hotel , " "motel , " and "quasi-
public" have the same meanings as are defined in the General Plan and
Zoning Ordinance of this City , as well as administrative
interpretations thereof.
Section 3-12_07_(c) LIMITATIONS ON USE
The words "except parks and recreations facilities" shall be
deleted and a new section 12 . 07 (c) shall read as follows :
(c) Fees from residential and nonresidential development may be
used for all types of capital improvements .
Section_3=12,110—EXCEPTIONS
Section 3-12 . 10 is deleted in its entirety and a new section 3-
12 . 10 shall be added to read as follows :
There is excepted from the fee imposed by this Chapter the
followincr:
(a) The construction of a building or structure or mobile
home which is a replacement for a building or mobile home being
demolished or moved ^ to outside the Cit_v from the same lot or parcel
• of land. The exception shall equal but not exceed the fee which
would be payable hereunder if the building or mobile home being
replaced were being newly constructed. If the fee imposed on the new
building exceeds the amount of this exception , such excess shall be
paid,
(b) Accessory buildings or structures in planned
developments , multi-family or mobile home parks , such as a clubhouse,
swimming pool , or laundry facility;
(c) Buildings or structures which are "clearly accessory to
a principal use" such as fences , pools , patios , parking spaces
garages , residential accessory buildings , (except guest houses) and
agricultural accessory buildings as outlined in Title 9;
(d) Any person when imposition of such tax upon that person
would be in violation of the Constitution and the laws of the State
of California , County of San Luis Obispo, or City of Atascadero;
(e) A condominium project converting an existing multi-
family building into condominiums where no new dwellings are added or
created.:
(f) Any rebuilding of a structure destroyed or damaged by
fire : explosion , act of God or other accident or catastrophe , which
rebuilding does not increase the original gross building area . If
such increase does occur , the increase shall be subject to the fee as
imposed by this chapter .
(g) Any restoration/reconstruction of a historic
a
building recognized, acknowledged, and designated as such by the Ci
Planning Commission or City Council ;
(h) The construction of any building by the City of
Atascadero , or the United States or any Department or Agencv thereof ,
or by the State of California or any Department , Agency or Political
Subdivision thereof , or any residential development where the City
Council finds there are specific over-riding fiscal , economic , social
or environmental factors benefitting the City which , in the sole
judgement of the City Council , would justify the approval of such
development without the payment of said tax .
SECTION 2 . PUBLICATION
The City Clerk shall cause this Ordinance to be Published in the
Atascadero News , a newspaper of general circulation, printed,
published and circulated in this City , once within fifteen (15) days
after its passage, in accordance with government code Section 36933;
and shall certify the adoption of this Ordinance : and shall cause
this Ordinance and certification to be entered into the Book of
Ordinances of this City .
SECTION 3 . EFFECTIVE DATE
This ordinance shall go into effect and be in full force and
effect at 12 . 01 a .m. on the 31st day after its passage . 0
On motion b Councilmember and seconded by
Y -
Councilmember the foregoing ordinance is hereby adopted
in its entirety by the following roll call vote :
AYES:
NOES :
ABSENT :
ATTEST:
BOYD C . SHARITZ BONITA BORGESON
City Clerk Mayor
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT : APPROVED AS TO FORM:
PAUL M. SENSIBAUGH JEFFREY G. JORGENSEN
Director of Public Works City Attorney
City Engineer
M E M O R A N D U M
• TO: City Manager Ray Windsor and City Council Members
FROM: Chief of Police
SUBJECT: Anti-Loitering Ordinance - Proposal (Ordinance No. 189)
DATE: January 16, 1989
RECOMMENDATION/COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED
Enact the attached ordinance adding Chapter 6 to Title 5 of the Atascadero
Municipal Code relating to loitering by minors during certain hours.
BACKGROUND
During the past two years, the issue of juveniles loitering about, unsupervised
at late and unusual hours, has been a topic of concern within various city
organizations and merchants groups.
As Council may recall, in October, 1988, the Atascadero Unified School District
Board of Education adopted a resolution (attached) in support of the enactment
of anti-loitering measures for our community. Additionally, in April, 1988,
the Atascadero Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors unanimously supported
a measure as follows: "Representing the business community, the Chamber of
Commerce endorses the concept of an anti-loitering/curfew law in Atascadero. . .
• It is believed that this would help to curtail loss of business due to loiterers,
prevent littering, enable police officers to question loiterers and help to
curtail malicious behavior causing vandalism and property damage."
Other groups offering support for this ordinance include:
1. Atascadero Junior Women's Club
2. Atascadero Safehomes Organization
3. Atascadero Police Officers Associations
4. Atascadero Bible Church
5. Action for Animal Rights
The comments offered by our Chamber of Commerce echo my philosophy well and
are, I believe, reflective of community sentiment to a large degree.
This material was compiled by City Attorney Jeff Jorgensen and myself, with
the final ordinance being written by Jeff. The proposed statute is a composite
of information obtained from various other municipalities which have similar
anti-loitering ordinances in place. In preparing this ordinance, individual
constitutional rights were carefully considered so as to insure a reasonable
approach.
In terms of enforcement, our police department will implement d utilize this
measure in a reasonable and equitable fashion so as to serve or commu ity in
the best possible manner.
• FISCAL IMPACT
No additional funding will be required for implementation of this ordinance.
MEMORANDUM
City of Atascadero
January 12 , 1989
TO: R. H. Bud McHale, Police Chief
FROM: Jeffrey G. Jorgensen, City Attorney
SUBJECT: Loitering By Minors During Certain Hours
In response to your memo of January 5, 1989, attached please
find a proposed ordinance adding Chapter 6 to Title 5 of the
Atascadero Municipal Code relating to loitering by minors
during certain hours. This ordinance has been drafted in an
attempt to avoid the problems experienced by the City of Long
Beach, whose ordinance was recently invalidated due to
vagueness.
Please feel free to contact me at your convenience if you have
questions or comments concerning the ordinance. If not,
please present it to the City Council as you consider
appropriate.
Sincerely,
J FRE G JO ENSEN
City Attorney
JGJ: fr
A:MMATA529
Attachments
cc_: City Council
�City Manager
1 � •
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Jeff Jorgensen, City Attorney
FROM: Chief of Police
SUBJ: "Anti-Loitering" Ordinance
DATE: Jan. 5, 1989
Attached for your review are copies of city ordinances from the cities of
Pismo Beach, Arroyo Grande, Morro Bay, Paso Robles, Grover City and Corcoran.
As you will recall, these examples were collected in keeping with Council
direction a few weeks ago.
A few comments/concerns relating to this issue follow:
1. There seems to be a consensus that we wish to de-emphasize the
use of the term "curfew".
2. We wish to establish an enforceable, useable and reasonable
ordinance which recognizes appropriate constitutional guidelines.
3. In terms of specific hours of enforcement, I would recommend
11:00 pm. to 5:00 am. seven days per week.
4. I believe the ordinances used by ismo Beach, Arroyo Grande,
and Corcoran are the closest to our o �ective. The penalty
section needs to be massaged and brought into our format. Probably
g g Y
some sort of graduated penalty needs to be considered for multiple
offenses. Also, we'll have to deem this a misdemeanor inasmuch as
in-custody arrests may result.
In terms of a time frame for implementation, I told Ray Windsor I'd endeavor
to prepare this for the Council Meeting of 1-24-89.
Thank you for your assistance.
RICHARD H. McHALE
RHM:sb
ORDINANCE NO. 189
AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ATASCADERO ADDING CHAPTER 6 TO TITLE 5 OF
THE ATASCADERO MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO
LOITERING BY MINORS DURING CERTAIN HOURS
The Council of the City of Atascadero does ordain as
follows:
Section 1. Chapter 6 is hereby added to Title 5 of the
Atascadero Municipal Code to read as follows:
Section 5-6. 01. Hours. It shall be unlawful
for any minor, under the age of eighteen (18) years,
to loiter, idle, wander, stroll, aimlessly drive or
ride about, or remain in or upon any public street,
avenue, highway, road, curb area, alley, park, play-
ground, public place, public building or other
public ground, place of amusement or entertainment,
eating place, vacant lot, or any other unsupervised
place between the hours of eleven o'clock (11: 00)
p.m. on any day and five o'clock (5: 00) a.m. of the
following day; provided, however, that the
provisions of this section do not apply:
(a) When the minor is accompanied by a parent,
spouse, guardian, or other adult having control or
charge of said minor.
(b) When the minor is upon an emergency errand
directed by his parent, spouse, guardian, or other
adult having control or charge of said minor.
(c) When the minor is returning directly to
his home or other place of residence after having
attended a place of amusement, entertainment,
recreational activity, school function, or social
call.
(d) When the minor is going directly to his
place of employment or while returning directly to
his home or other place of residence after having
left his place of employment.
Section 5-6. 02 . Responsibility. It shall be
unlawful for any parent, guardian, or any adult
person having legal control or charge of a minor,
under the age of eighteen (18) years, to willfully
ORDINANCE NO. 189
Page 2
or knowingly permit or allow such minor to violate
Section 5-6.01 of this Chapter, and it shall be
unlawful for any other person, firm, corporation,
or organization to willfully or knowingly aid,
abet, or assist any minor, under the age of eighteen
(18) years, in violating said Section 5-6. 01.
Section 5-6. 03. Exceptions to Hours Specified.
The City Council may, by resolution, temporarily
change or relax the hours herein specified, provided
special circumstances or special events justify such
action.
Section 5-6. 04 . violations; penalties. Any
person, firm, corporation, or organization violating
any provisions of this Chapter shall be guilty of a
misdemeanor.
Section 2 . Publication. The City Clerk shall cause this
ordinance to be published once within fifteen (15) days after
its passage in the Atascadero News, a newspaper of general
circulation, printed, published and circulated in this City in
accordance with Government Code Section 36933 ; shall certify
the adoption of this ordinance; and shall cause this ordinance
and certification to be entered in the Book of Ordinances of
this City.
Section 3 . Effective Date. This ordinance shall go into
effect and be in full force and effect at 12 : 01 a.m. on the
thirty-first (31st) day after its passage.
On motion by Council member and
seconded by Council member the foregoing
ordinance is hereby adopted in its entirety by the following
roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
DATE ADOPTED:
i
ORDINANCE NO. 189
Page 3
CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA
By
BONITA BORGESON, Mayor
ATTEST:
BOYD C. SHARITZ, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
JEFFREY G. JORGENSEN, City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
JGJ: f r/1/10/8 9
C:ORATA681
Atascadero Unified School District
"Where students and their education a�e.paramount"
5601 WEST MALL
ANTHONY AVINA, Ed.D. ATASCADERO, CA 93422-4234
District Superintendent PHONE: (805)466-0393
October 25, 1988
The Honorable Bonita Borgeson
Mayor
City of Atascadero
P. 0. Box 747
Atascadero, CA 93423
Dear Mayor Borgeson:
The Board of Education of the Atascadero Unified School District is
deeply concerned with the welfare of the students and the youth of
this community. Accordingly, at a special meeting of the Board on
October 19 , 1988, the Board adopted resolution #9 to support the
anti—loitering measures which may help to combat the growing concern
of the community for its youth. In adopting this resolution, it was
not the intention of the Board to usurp the authority of the City
Council or of the Atascadero Policy Department. Rather, the Board
wishes to support the City and the Police Department in their efforts
to protect our youth and our community.
Attached is a copy of the resolution as adopted. If you have any
questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Ta you.
incerely yours,
nthony Avina .D.
District Su eiintendent
AA :ejs
cc: City Manager Ray Windsor
Chief Richard "Bud" McHale, APD
Board of Education, AUSD
Carrisa Plains Elementary Creston Elementary Lewis Avenue Elementary Monterey Road Elementary
San Gabriel Road Elementary • Santa Margarita Elementary Santa Rosa Road Elementary 0 Atascadero Junior High School
Atascadero Senior High School 0 Atascadero Adult School Oak Hills Continuation High School
ATASCADERO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
RESOLUTION 9
ANTI-LOITERING MEASURES - CITY OF ATASCADERO
WHEREAS , the City of Atascadero is a growing and critical part of the
Atascadero Unified School District ; and
WHEREAS, the students, who are the responsibility of the District
during school hours , become the responsibility of their
parents and other agencies at the conclusion of the school
day ; and
WHEREAS , SafeHomes was organized to identify ways to safeguard the
welfare of the youth in our community , and
WHEREAS , the PTAs are cooperatively supporting those efforts, and
WHEREAS , a community-wide effort is necessary to address this growing
concern , and
WHEREAS , the school district acknowledges that it can play a role in
helping to find solutions to the loitering and late hours
which our youth are experiencing ; and
WHEREAS , the school district also recognizes that such loitering
presents a potential danger to the youth of this community
as well as to the community itself ;
NOW, THEREFORE, LET IT BE KNOWN, that the Board of Education of the
Atascadero Unified School District is prepared to work
cooperatively with the parents , community organizations ,
PTAs, along with City and County governments to find
solutions to the growing problem of loitering in the
community .
Moved by Trustee King seconded by Trustee
Molle
Ayes: Beck, Burt , Haynes , Horst , King, LaSalle , and Molle .
Noes: None .
Absent : None .
President , rd of Education Clerk , Board of Education
Adopted this 19th day of October , 1988 .
1�,Ho ,.��
CUM (n
4 T A SCA D E R 0 P. 0. Box 2237 Atascadero, CA 93423
November 17, 1988
TO: Atascadero City Council
FROM: Families for Alcohol and Drug Free Youth
RE: Anti- loitering Curfew Law
In March. 1988. Families for Alcohol and Drug Free Youth--Sponsors
of Atascadero Safehomes initiated a proposal to establish an
Anti-Loitering curfew law for the City of Atascadero and
Unincorporated Areas. Letters regarding this proposal were sent to
several community agencies. The letters outlined the following
reasons we desire a curfew law be put into effect :
1 . To reduce unsupervised, unauthorized, and unchaperoned youth
activities in the late evening and early morning hours.
2. To support parental control and family sponsored activities.
3. To provide guidelines for parents on reasonable hours.
4. To help parents and law enforcement personnel deal with alcohol
and drug use .
5. To give law enforcement agencies authorization to question ,
investigate , and monitor youth activity after curfew hours.
6. To curtail malicious behavior and reduce vandalism to private
and business property.
We feel that youth activities should be a community concern . We
need to show our youth that we do care by setting down limits and
guidelines for them to follow. We know there are those who will
disagree with a curfew law citing an enfringement of personal
rights. But when a situation is out of control , unmonitored, and
potentially dangerous, the rights of individuals, families and the
community are all being jeopardized.
The two hundred Safehome families and other individual endorsements
represented by Families for Alcohol and Drug Free Youth are joining
the following agencies in supporting the passage of an Anti-
Loitering/Curfew Law.
- Atascadero Junior Women's Club
- Atascadero Police Officers Association
- Atascadero Board of Education
- Atascadero Bible Church
- Action for Animal Rights
- Atascadero Chamber of Commerce
Please notify us when this issue will be an agenda item for a
council meeting.
(805) 466-8438
d -
TIERRA ADORADA gtascadero &7un or omen's oub �?
DISTRICT P.O. BOX 460, ATASCADERO, CA, 93423
c90,�.05.o lg8f
49JM09i Out 'foz;e- I;Kn 0/ao cad av
wrir�- urtJ-mew otttb � ,;ULL Pay
.`6ta(r{,c" a 4gt,)
law
c V 1
oj&"od�"
U
Atascadero Police
Officers Association
POST OFFICE BOX 1841
ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA 93423
PHONE (805) 466-8600
October 20, 1988
To: Familes for Alcohol and Drug Free Youth
P.O. Box 2237 Atascadero, ,-Ca. 93423
The Atascadero Police Officers Association joins with the familes
for alcohol and drug free youth endorsing the concept of a
resonable and workable Anti-Loitering/Curefew Law.
✓?!
Bryan Berry
Association President
ATASCADERO MALL AT FREEWAY 101
PHONE(805)466-2051 P.O.Bo:887
REV. E. B. CLAUD, JR., Pastor ATASCADERO,CALIFORNIA 93423.0887
PARSONAGE PHONE: 466-8485
TOM FERRELL, Associate Pastor
HOME PHONE: 466-0316
RICH WHITTINGTON, Youth Pastor
HOME PHONE: 466-6588
October 24, 1988
Families of Alcohol and Drug Free Youth
P.O. Box 2237
Atascadero, CA 93423
Gentlemen:
The Board of Elders and Board of Trustees of Atascadero Bible
Church endorse the concept of an anti-loitering/curfew law in
Atascadero.
Sinc yo )
i"
A
Rev. E.B. Claud,,��r.
EVANGELICAL s NONDENOMINATIONAL s INDEPENDENT
• •
Action For Animals' Rights (AFAR)
Z •"`e► ? A Non-Profit Volunteer Animal Welfare Organization
ANtMP'
ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA 93423 PHONE: (805)466-5403
8935 Morro Rd. , Suite 2, Atascadero, CA 93422
October 4,1988
Families for Alcohol and
Drug Free Youth
P.O. Box 2237
Atascadero, CA 93423
Dear Friends :
Representing our board of directors , Action For Animals '
Rights (AFAR) endorses your proposal for an anti-loitering/curfew
law in Atascadero.
We believe that our youth need and want direction from
parents and elders, and that it is easier to prevent a trouble
than it is to cure it.
We will support your proposal to the City Council, and
thank you for taking this initiative for the good of our community.
Sincerely,
Daphne W. a sing
President
fast ro c�Z�m er�� commerce
6550 EL CAMINO REAL • ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA 93422
_ TELEPHONE: (805) 466-2044
April 18, 1988
TO: Chief- Bud McHale
Rolfe Nelson, Atascadero High School
Dr. Rcbert and Mrs Vi.cKi Perce, Safe Hounes
FROM: Maggie Rice, Executive Manager
RE : Propcsed curfew 1^%;, in Atascadero
At the request of Rolfe Nelson , the Board of Dirc tors has
discussed a request for support of a curfew law in Atascadero.
Pc?ice Chief McHale was invited to co,meznt at this r:,,=et:ing on
Ap-c it 12 , 1988. Fe expressed that hP would Like to see a c,irfew/
ant:1-loiterin" o_•dinane- written provided the. community wanted i.t.
The Beard of Directors made a motion as follows: "Represent:i.ng
the business community, the Chamber of Commerce endorses the
ccncep'_ of an anti-loitering/curfew law in Atascadero."
Unanimous approval.
It is believed that this would help to curtail loss of business
dun to loiterers , prevent littering, enable police officers to
question loiterers and help to curtail malicious behavior causing
v:�ndalism and property dam,--,ge.
iZi
• MEMORANDUM
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
Through: Ray Windsor, City Manager
From: Paul M. Sensibaugh, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Subject : Request Partial Abandonment-Sewer Easement
Date : January 16, 1989
Recommendation :
Staff recommends that Council adopt Resolution 2-89 which sets
February 14 as a public hearing date for the consideration of the
abandonment of a portion of the sanitary sewer within the Century
Plaza parking lot (detail "B") , the abandonment of a portion of the
Public Utility Easement (PUE) within the Century Plaza parking lot
and the Capistrano right-of-way (detail "A: ") , and the abandonment.
of a portion of a sewer and water easement in Capistrano right-of-
way (detail "C" , parcel 1 and parcel 2) .
Note : The Resolution of Vacation will be presented at the
February 14 Public Hearing to be passed at that time if there are no
objections from the public . The Resolution of Vacation will
indicate that a public hearing was held and that the `acts are as
stated in the Resolution of intention 2-29 above .
Background:
Century Plaza has requested an encroachment into the existing
sanitary sewer easement, the PUE and a proposed sewer and water
easement, which they granted the City for the development of the
theater expansion project and Brookhill Restaurant . The latter two
portions of easements do not actually affect any utilities but are
included in the public "nearing so that the most conservative
approach is taken with respect to the abandonment .
The corner of proposed building "J" will protrude into the
sewer easement if that construction is permitted. Therefore, it is
necessary to request abandonment of a portion of the easement to
accomodate the same . Exhibit B is the indemnity agreement that
controls the above building near the easement . Exhibit A (1-10) is
the attachment to the agreement that contains the sketches and
descriptions for all three easement abandonment requests .
•
Discussion: •
Since the building will not be directly over the sewer line,
but within two feet of it, and since the building will be designed
in such a manner that no bearing pressure will affect the sewer
trench, staff is willing to accept the proposal based upon the
signing of the attached Indemnity Agreement prepared by the City
Attorney.
Fiscal Impact :
There is no cost associated with this request since no money
was given for the easement at the time of formation.
•
•
RESOLUTION 2-89
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO
CONSIDERING THE INTENTION TO VACATE A PORTION OF A SANITARY
SEWER EASEMENT IN THE CENTURY PLAZA PARKING LOT AND TO
VACATE A PORTION OF A P.U.E. IN THE CENTURY PLAZA PARKING
LOT AND CAPISTRANO RIGHT-OF-WAY AND TO VACATE A PORTION OF
A SEWER AND WATER EASEMENT IN THE CAPISTRANO RIGHT-OF-
WAY PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 3, SECTION 8320, ET . SEQ. . OF THE
STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE.
NOW, THEREFORE. the Council of the City of Atascadero
resolves as follows :
1 . It is the intention of the Citv of Atascadero to
consider abandoning (1) a portion of the sanitary sewer
easement in the Century Plaza parking lot , (2) a portion of
a public utility easement (PUE) in the Century Plaza
parking lot and the Capistrano richt-of-Wav, and (3) a
portion of a sewer and water easement in the Capistrano
right-of-way, as shown on attached Exhibit A (paaes 1-10)
and subject to the agreement shown as Exhibit B, pursuant
to Chapter 3, Section 8320 et . sea. of the Streets and
Hig_hways Code .
2 . The proposed abandonment is categorically exempt
from the provisions of the California Environmental Qualitv
Act . (Class 5 : Section 15305)
3 . Copies of the map showing the particulars of the
proposed abandonments are on file in the Community
Development Department and the Public Works Department .
4 . The Citv Council shall hold a public hearing at
the reaularly scheduled Citv Council meeting to be held
February 14 , 1989 at 7 : 00 p .m. or later . in the City
Council Chambers . Administration Building. 6500 Palma
Avenue . Atascadero . The public hearing will consider a
Resolution of Vacation at which time all persons interested
in the proposed vacation may be heard.
5 . The Citv Clerk shall cause the notice of this
public hearing_ to be published in the same manner as other
Resolutions of the Council .
6 . The Director of Communitv Development shall cause
to be posted, conspicuous notices of vacation in compliance
with Streets and Hiahways Code Section 8322 .
s
0 0
This Resolution was passed and adopted on January 24 ,
1989.
AYES :
NOES :
ABSENT :
ATTEST:
BOYD C . SHARITZ BONITA BORGESON, Mavor
Citv Clerk
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
PAUL M. SENSIBAUGH JEFFREY G. JORGENSEN
Director of Public Works Citv Attornev
City Enaineer
co
4 it
.a� F���
Illb IQ
f` w 'Sya3 II a ,,I R
_ \ 3 1�1 I• _\ LS,
'st� It. a �% �Ia
.'C �' �_�� � '•i.C���."�'\• � ttIVB /� �"
IQ
40
/ qL
�
• s . . 'a c^
.,
IL
u SO
tlx
lit
b i •:S
�.. � • � � itrr A�It'A
i 4 t t �i !
A 1' I Ili . " 1
v I
At
1 �
X.
� t �Vr (t// 'S`r,'%� yf/ t' ��yYs•'� ty.t! iR �- .
j2It It fig.
tx
t t A to rt
let
M.
14 at
�� i. f '•f� i� t►I 1� y�S' Rx
�Z_ i �'!� Ltsj.1 Z Mit'• NT
�+ri• lk
7� Z��at. �i2 �s � `• Y v
• ^qty i o R'UlfA
7.r MQ•U'fi
AfAfeAl
sscs see
f�1'i'STlNG FRLf OF 6U,PB
PROP03f0 0+,14 IMNAMC"d"
QLOYs. ~✓"'
W6.L?7 INV IN
�b
EX/STING f.4LG� OF LU�PB
GX/3T/Nle SEI�IE,PL/NE
yn
t.2i•
r
6EmzA7 P.PD.C/IfI rK PLAN Ylem
Z �
v .44
M t35
NI
w
ki
,Je
sil
d Vat ' ia ^Y
IN
bj
H �
t$L �
N
W �
<\ In
k
,sy
/ V
W„�
_ w
► �z o
R►, W n
a
wz�
vUtv 3
w
i
3�
h� z 0
ku
. w
V�
L V i p, �.
sh
V � v •sem
V
v
h
r
^ � Z
s
1
Ilk
� � 0
W
r
Q
` W
�.i
y
Sk
+ r IF i3.'Erv� t
SI t �'[• j I'd x ,.{
JAh
i.
M � 4
3
L
�L s
�•
�,� .
N/i!/Y/L8'!�8
�i�s�e
•� s y 06+0
�Ya �^�
b�c� � ,�Q Q � F.
,� � o Oc
p ! �' �L'��'8 ?
W � QfE• pg�p � �`
� , o , v�
ti � :•:
� h �'
� � � � �
e���� �
,�8 0 ot�v
b�ti �`
� � �Q � �
�v�s�8
oo�o �
v
v �
M ld ryv� �
SL�1>8
. 8�'�v
98Zq'8
01�*0
tJ'••SY8
O��O
I
� � � �
� m � a
i •
WILSON LAND SURVEYS
74018 EL CAMINO REAL ATASCAOERO, CALIFORNIA 93422 (805) 466-2445
-t
0
r
EASEMENT ABANDONMENT FOR CENTURY PLAZA AUGUST 11, 1988
"B" SEWER ABANDONMENT ..
That portion of Parcel 1 of Parcel Map AT 85-225 in the City of Atascadero,
County of San Luis Obispo, State of California according to the sap filed in
Book 45 of Parcel Maps at Page 8 in the Recorder's Office of said County and
State described as follows:
Beginning at the most northerly corner of said Parcel 1, said corner being
on the centerline of Capistrano Avenue; thence along the line common to
Parcels 1 and 3 of said Parcel Map South 80 46146" West a distance of 279.39
feet to the angle point in said line; thence leaving said line South
66 06'51 East a distance of 85.32 feet to the true point of beginning;thence
South 38 45'45" East a distance of 34. 13 feet; thence South 8 53'11" East a
distance of 3.31 feet; thence North 39 37'05" West a distance of 38.27 feet;
thence North 80 53'23" EAst a distance of 2.56 feet to the true point of
beginning.
V
DOUG
tv .- z
Kenneth D. WIlson LS 5571 EXP 9-30-89 No. 5571
yl\OF CAi-IE�Q
0
WILSON LAND SURVEYS
1 L CAMINO REAL ATASCAOERO. CALIFORNIA 93422 (805) 466-2445
0
EASEMENT ABANDONMENT FOR CENTURY PLAZA AUGUST 11, 1988
"A" PUE ABANDONMENT
That portion of Parcel 1 of Parcel Map AT 85-225 in the City of Atascadero,
County of San Luis Obispo, State of California according to the map filed in
Book 45 of Parcel Maps at Page 8 in the Recorder's Office of said County and
State described as follows:
Beginning at the most northerly corner of said Parcel 1, said corner being
on the centerline of Capistrartu Avenue; thence along the line common to
Parcels 1 and 3 of said Parcel Map South 80 46'46" west a distance of 279.39
feet to the angle point in said line; thence leaving said line South
71 25'34 East a distance of 100.01 feet to the true point of beginning;
thence South 8 53'11" East a distance of 55.83 feet; thence South 15 39'46"
West a distance of 20. 18 feet; thence North 14 39'20" West a distance of
46.82 feet; thence North 51 42'20" West a distance of 30.90 feet; thence
North 35 09'21" East a distance of 6.71 feet; thence North 80 53120" East a
i
distance of 29.43 feet to the true point of beginning.
IRLr LfV ;�c%c)`.
------nnet------------------------------------ -
Keh D. WIlson LS 5571 EXP 9-30-89 Z
No. 5571
CP
�TF OF CA���`��
�._.._
WILSON LAND SURVEYS
74018 EL CAMINO REAL ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA 93422 (805) 466-2440
EASEMENT ABANDONMENT FOR CENTURY PLAZA AUGUST 11, 1988
"C• MATER AND SEWER ABANDONMENT
Those portions of Parcel 1 of Parcel Mop AT 85-225 in the City of
Atascadero, County of San Luis Obispo, State of California according to the
map filed in Book 45 of Parcel Maps at Page 8 in the Recorder's Office of
said County and State described as follows:
PARCEL 1
Beginning at the most northerly corner of said Parcel 1, said corner being
on the centerline of Capistrano Avenue; thence along the line common to
Parcels 1 and 3 of said Parcel Map South 80 46'46" West a distance of 279.39
feet to the angle point in said line; thence leaving said line South
60 57'00 East a distance of 75.20 feet to the true point of beginning;thence
South 35 09'21" West a distance of 6.71 feet; thence North 54 50'39" West a
distance of 6.89 feet; thence North 80 53120" East a distance of 9.61 feet
to the true point of beginning.
PARCEL 2
Beginning at the most northerly corner of said Parcel 1, said corner being
on the centerline of Capistrano Avenue; thence along the line common to
Parcels 1 and 3 of said Parcel Map South 80 46'46" West a distance of 279.39
feet to the angle point in said line; thence leaving said line South
34 06'42 East a distance of 58.57 feet to the true point of beginning;thence
South 58 02'23" West a distance of 4.92 feet; thence North 31 57'38" West a
distance of 2.20 feet; thence South 20 05.53" West a distance of 15. 17 feet;'
thence North 35 09121" East a distance of 18.32 feet to the true point of
beginning.
----------------------------------------
Kenneth
_------u-------------------------------Kenneth D. Wilson LS 5571 EXP 9-30-89 ' DOUG
No. 5571
��OF CA1���`'
EXHIBIT B
s
Recording requested by:
When recorded mail to:
City of Atascadero
6500 Palma Avenue
. Atascadero, CA 93422
APN a9
INDEMNITY AGREEMENT
AFFECTING REAL PROPERTY
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of
, 19 , by and between EL CAMINO ASSOCIATES, a
California General Partnership, hereinafter referred to as
"Indemnitor", and the CITY OF ATASCADERO, a Municipal
Corporation of the State of California, hereinafter referred
to as "City".
WHEREAS, Indemnitor is the owner of that certain real
property located within the City of Atascadero, commonly known
as Century Plaza, and more particularly described in the
attached Exhibit "A" incorporated herein as though fully set
forth; and
WHEREAS, Indemnitor has applied to the City of Atascadero
for the partial abandonment of a sewer easement granted to the
City and recorded at Volume 1556 of Official Records at Page
91 in the office of the County Recorder, County of San Luis
Obispo; and
WHEREAS, said partial abandonment of the sewer easement
is necessary and convenient to the further development of
Century Plaza by Indemnitor; and
WHEREAS, said partial abandonment of the sewer easement
will allow the construction of a building and other structures
within close proximity to a main sewer line owned and operated
by the City; and
WHEREAS, in consideration for said partial abandonment of
the sewer easement, the City requires that Indemnitor
indemnify and hold harmless the City for any and all claims
that may arise from the abandonment;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the parties
as follows:
•
1
1. Indemnification.
(a) Indemnitor shall defend, indemnify, and save
harmless the City of Atascadero, its officers, agents, and
employees, from any and all claims, demands, damages, costs,
expenses, liability, and attorneys' fees and costs arising out
of the above-referenced abandonment, including but not limited
to any negligent act or omission to act, or any wrongful act,
on the part of Indemnitor, or of agents, employees or
independent contractors directly responsible to Indemnitor,
which in any way causes damage to, interruption of, or
interference with the remaining sewer easement or the sewer
line owned and operated by the City of Atascadero.
(b) Indemnitor shall defend, indemnify, and save
harmless the City of Atascadero, its officers, agents, and
employees, from any and all claims, demands, damages, costs,
expenses, liability, and attorneys' fees and costs arising out
of the above-referenced abandonment, including but not limited
to any negligent act or omission to act, or any wrongful act,
on the part of Indemnitor, or of agents, employees or
independent contractors directly responsible to Indemnitor, or
for any act or omission arising out of the operation,
maintenance, or repair of the sewer line owned and operated by
the City of Atascadero which causes any damage to,
interference with, or settlement to the proposed building to
be constructed by Indemnitor as a part of the further
development of Century Plaza along the perimeter of the
remaining easement.
(c) The foregoing shall apply to any wrongful act or any
passively negligent act or omission to act, committed jointly
or concurrently by Indemnitor, Indem- nitor's agents, employees
or independent contractors, and the City of Atascadero, its
agents, employees or independent contractors. Nothing
contained in the foregoing indemnity provisions shall be
construed to require Indemnitor to indemnify the City against
any responsibility or liability in contravention of Section
2782 of the Civil Code.
2. Right of Entry. City shall have the right of
reasonable entry onto the easement area, the partially
abandoned easement area, and the adjacent land of Indemnitor
during normal business hours for the purpose of operation,
repair, or maintenance of City's sewer line, and at any time
during an emergency.
3 . Binding on Successors in Interest. This Indemnity
Agreement shall run with the land described herein and shall
inure to the benefit of and be binding on all parties hereto
and on all heirs, assigns, or successors in interest.
2
4. Modification. This Agreement constitutes the entire
understanding of the parties hereto, and no changes, amend-
ments, or alterations shall be effective unless in writing and
signed by all the parties or their successors in interest.
5. Costs and Attorneys' Fees. In the event Indemnitor
or its successors in interest fail to indemnify City as
provided hereunder, Indemnitor and its successors in interest
agree to pay all costs and expenses incurred by City in
securing performance of such obligations, including costs of
suit and reasonable attorneys' fees.
6. Enforceability. If any term, covenant, condition,
or provision of this Agreement is held by a court of competent
jurisdiction to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, the
remainder of the provisions hereof shall remain in full force
and effect and shall in no way be affected, impaired, or
invalidated thereby.
7. Agreement to be Recorded. Indemnitor and City
intend and consent to the recordation of this Agreement in the
office of the County Recorder in the County of San Luis
Obispo.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this
Agreement as of the day and year first above written.
INDEMNITOR: EL CAMINO ASSOCIATES,
a California General
Partnership
B J M. HARRIS N, By ' nneth Fr��Q'�____..
naging General Partner General Partner
By / B�
ON, JR. , Little,
General Partner General Partner
3
CIS: CITY OF ATASCADERO,
a Municipal Corporation
By
BONITA BORGESON, Mayor
ATTEST:
BOYD C. SHARITZ, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
PAUL M. SENSIBAUGH,
Public Works Director
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
F Y NSEN,
C' y A o� ey
JGJ:fr/12/29/88
C:AGATA680
4
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO ) ss.
On this day of , 19 , before me,
' a Notary Public, State of California,
duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared BONITA
BORGESON, personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis
of satisfactory evidence) to be the person who executed this
instrument as Mayor of the CITY OF ATASCADERO, a Municipal
Corporation of the State of California, and acknowledged to me
that said Municipal Corporation executed it.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my name
and affixed my official seal on the day and year in this
certificate first above written.
Notary Public,
State of California
[Notary Seal]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO ) ss.
On this day of �,Qt1�.LC1 n , 19 , before me,
a Notary Publ ' , State of California,
duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared JAMES M.
HARRISON
(or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be
the persons who executed this instrument as Managing General
Partner and ,Genera! _partner-, respeetvW.y, of EL CAMINO
ASSOCIATES, a California General Partnership, and acknowledged
to me that said General Partnership executed it.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my name
and affixed my official seal on the day and year in this
certificate first above written
�- PM`yE E. H. PDLETTI
14NI ;Y FL!KIC
Sidi LU-IS LIFOR ti C4flflTY t �`
CALiFOI�'iIA
My Commission Expires on April 3,1992
N tary Pub c,
State of ' fornia
[Notary Seal]
5
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )as.
C " COUNTY OF an U1 S Obispo _) 0
n `
E or, January 4, 1989 .before me,the undersigned,a Notary Public in and for
4
U b said State,personally appeared Kenneth R fryer
f-
c
�o
U
N
E
Q
w personally known to me(or proved to me on the basis of satis
LL factory evidence)to be the person that executed the within PAIGE E. H. POLETTI
a instrument as a General partner(s), , NOTARY PUBLIC
L El Camino Associates, "'g SAN LUIS OSISP+� COUNTY
N ,
on behalf of CALIFORNIA
t
the partnership Itily Commission Expires mi April 1982
a
therein named and acknowledged to me that the partnership
coco executed it.
Mr WIT SS my han and Micial seal.
o
0
co
a
Signature (this area for official notarial seal)
c
)
STATE OF CALIS%Fil It
LUl S Obl Sp0 )ss.
C COUNTY OF Ja )
co Januar 1989
E On y b, before me,the undersigned,a Notary Public in and for
L) said State,personally appeared William ` Wa eOn, .1r
i=
c
m
U
E
Q
N personally known to me(or proved to me on the basis of satis-
factory evidence) to be the person that executed the within
a instrument as a General PAIGE E. H. POLETTI
partner(s), QP
NOTARY PUBLIC
on behalf of E1 Camino Associates SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
CALIFORNIA
IL the partnership My Commission Expires on April 3,1992
N therein named and acknowledged to me that the partnership
m executed i
r> WITNESS han and official seal.
o
a
Signature (This area for official notarial seal)
)
STATE OF CA` OR IA . )ss.
c COUNTY OF an fur Obispo )
CL / r7C
E On CLrt�cCL.2t.� %c , 1 C/e/ before me,the undersigned,a Notary Public in and for
0
L) said State,personally appeared Gaylen.-Little
ro
i=
c
A
U
E
Q
h personally known to me(or proved to me on the basis of satis-
iz
factory evidence) to be the person that executed the within
a instrument as--D General partner(s),
on behalf of E1 Camino Associates DIANNA SANTOS
the partnership _ �. NOTARY PUBLIC
CL 4 SAN LUIS 088SPO COUNTY
N therein named and acknowledged to me that the partnership "� ISOGICALIFORNIA
w executed it.
tdy commission Expires on June 16,1989
o WITNESS my hand and official seal.
o �
c�
Signature Q x,x 'may (This area for official notarial seal)
• MEETI AGENDA
DAA
•
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: City Manager Ray Windsor and City Council Members
FROM: Chief of Police
SUBJECT: Proposed Council Agenda Item: Adoption of Ordinance
# 190 amending Ordinance #135 and adopt Resolution
Number 6-89 , a Signature Resolution.
DATE : January 6, 1989
RECOMMENDATION/COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
Adopt Ordinance # 190, amending Ordinance #135, the "Emergency
Organization or finance of Atascadero" ; and adopt, in whole,
Resolution 6-89 to conform with the requirements of the
California O.E.S . and the federal F.E.M.A. for organizational
structure.
• BACKGROUND:
Ordinance #135, the "Emergency Organization Ordinance of Atasca-
dero" was originally passed by the City Council on July 14 ,
1986 . That ordinance did not specify the structural position of
"Coordinator of Emergency Services" . In October 1988 , the City
of Atascadero applied to the Federal Emergency Management Agency
(F.E .M.A. ) for federal matching funds for the position of Coor-
dinator of Emergency Services . As a result of that application,
the City was informed by F.E .M.A. that the position of Coordina-
tor needed to meet the following requirements :
1 . That the position of Coordinator of Emergency Services
be created and established within the organizational
structure of the emergency service organization.
2 . The Coordinator of Emergency Services be appointed by
the Director of Emergency Services to manage the day-
to-day operations of the emergency services organiza-
tion.
3 . That the Coordinator of Emergency Services be required,
in time of emergency, to report directly to the Direc-
tor.
• Revisions to Ordinance, #135 to meet the above requirements:
SECTION 4-4 . 04 : DISASTER COUNCIL MEMBERSHIP
C. The Coordinator of Emergency Services as appointed
by the Director of Emergency Services .
•
SECTION 4-4 .06 : DIRECTOR, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR AND COORDINATOR
OF EMERGENCY SERVICES
C. There is hereby created the office of Coordinator
of Emergency Services, who shall be appointed by
the Director.
SECTION 4-4 . 07 : POWERS AND DUTIES OF THE DIRECTOR, ASSISTANT
AND COORDINATOR OF EMERGENCY SERVICES
D. The Coordinator of Emergency Services, shall under
the supervision of the Director, manage the day-
to-day operations of the Atascadero civil defense/
emergency services program. In time of an actual
emergency, the Coordinator of Emergency Services
shall report directly to the Director.
SECTION 4-4 . 09 : EMERGENCY PLAN
The Coordinator of Emergency Services, at the direction
of the City of Atascadero Disaster Council, shall be responsible •
for the development and continual updating of the City of
Atascadero Emergency Plan, which plan shall provide for the
effective mobilization of all of the resources of this City, both
public and private, to meet any condition constituting a local
emergency, state of emergency, or state of war emergency; and
shall provide for the organization, powers and duties , services
and staff of the emergency organization. Such plan shall take
effect upon adoption by resolution of the City Council .
It was also required by F.E .M.A. that the City adopt a ' Signature
Resolution' in order that the signatures on the various required
forms submitted to F.E .M.A. be able to be verified as official .
The requested resolution is presented as Resolution Number 6-89 .
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no foreseen fiscal impact to the City; however, the
adoption of these changes and resolution will enable the City to
receive federal matching funds for the position of Coordinator of
Emergency Services .
For your consideration. . .
Rich rd H. McHale
RHM: jph/cw 2
I
• •
RESOLUTION ION SER 6-89
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA, THAT
THE FOLLOWING NAMED INDIVIDUALS ARE HEREBY AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE FOR AND IN
BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, A PUBLIC ENTITY ESTABLISHED UNDER THE LAWS OF
THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, APPLICATIONS AND DOCUMENTS FOR THE PURPOSE OF OBTAINING
FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE UNDER THE FEDERAL CIVIL DEFENSE ACT OF 1950, AS AMENDED,
(PUBLIC LAW 920, 81ST CONGRESS, 50 USC APP. 2251-2297) .
RAY WINDSOR. E. S. DIRECTOR
RICHARD H. MCHALE. ASST. E.S. DIR.
WILLIAM WATTON. E. S. COORDINATOR
PASSED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF 1989
MAYOR COUNCILPERSON
COUNCILPERSON COUNCILPERSON
COUNCILPERSON COUNCILPERSON
CERTIFICATION
I, BOYD SHARITZ, DULY APPOINTED AND CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO,
CALIFORNIA DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A
RESOLUTION PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO,
CALIFORNIA ON THE DAY OF 1989.
DATE:
CITY CLERK, CITY OF ATASCADERO
r
ORDINANCE NO. 190
AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ATASCADERO AMENDING CHAPTER 4 OF TITLE 4
OF THE ATASCADERO MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING
TO EMERGENCY ORGANIZATIONS AND FUNCTIONS
The Council of the City of Atascadero does ordain as
follows:
Section 1. Text Change.
(a) Section 4-4.04 is amended by deleting subparagraph
(c) in its entirety and adding a new subparagraph (c) as
follows:
(c) The Coordinator of Emergency Services, as
appointed by the Director of Emergency Services.
(b) The title of Section 4-4.06 is deleted in its
entirety and a new title is added as follows:
Section 4-4.06. Director, Assistant Director,
and Coordinator of Emergency Services.
(c) A new paragraph (c) is added to Section 4-4. 06 as
follows:
(c) There is hereby created the office of
Coordinator of Emergency Services, who shall be
appointed by the Director.
(d) The title of Section 4-4 .07 is deleted in its
entirety and a new title is added as follows:
Section 4-4. 07. Powers and Duties of the
Director, Assistant Director, and Coordinator of
Emergency Services.
(d) A new paragraph (d) is added to Section 4-4 . 07 as
follows:
(d) The Coordinator of Emergency Services
shall, under the supervision of the Director, manage
the day-to-day operations of the Atascadero civil
defense/emergency services program. In time of an ,
actual emergency, the Coordinator of Emergency
Services shall report directly to the Director.
ORDINANCE NO. 190
Page 2
(e) Section 4-4.09 is deleted in its entirety and a new
Section 4-4.09 is added as follows:
Section 4-4.09. Emergency Plan. The
Coordinator of Emergency Services, at the direction
of the City of Atascadero Disaster Council, shall be
responsible for the development and continual
updating of the City of Atascadero Emergency Plan,
which plan shall provide for the effective
mobilization of all of the resources of this City,
both public and private, to meet any condition
constituting a local emergency, state of emergency,
or state of war emergency; and shall provide for the
organization, powers and duties, services, and staff
of the emergency organization. Such plan shall take
effect upon adoption by resolution of the City
Council.
Section 2 . Publication. The City Clerk shall cause this
ordinance to be published once within fifteen (15) days after
its passage in the Atascadero News, a newspaper of general
circulation, printed, published and circulated in this City in
accordance with Government Code Section 36933 ; shall certify
the adoption of this ordinance; and shall cause this ordinance
and certification to be entered in the Book of Ordinances of
this City.
Section 3 . Effective Date. This ordinance shall go into
effect and be in full force and effect at 12:01 a.m. on the
thirty-first (31st) day after its passage.
.On motion by Council member and
seconded by Council member , the foregoing
ordinance is hereby adopted in its entirety by the following
roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
DATE ADOPTED:
ORDINANCE NO. 19C)
Page 3
CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA
By
BONITA BORGESON, Mayor
ATTEST:
BOYD C. SHARITZ, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
JEFFREY G. JORGENSEN, City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
JGJ: fr/1/16/89
C:ORATA682
• • MEETI AGENDA _
DA ITEM �._
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: City Council
FROM: Ray Windsor, City Manager
SUBJECT: HVAC Bid
DATE: January 24 , 1989
This memo is intended to further clarify the attached staff
report.
The latest bids on this project were received November 10, 1988 .
Under the terms of the bid, we were allowed 30 days in which to
award or reject same. When we realized that there would be a
problem because of the amount of the low bid, we met with the
company and asked for additional time in which to consider pos-
sible alternatives for Council consideration.
I am pointing this out because a decision, one way or another,
must be made at your meeting of the 24th in order to meet the
terms and conditions of the bidding process and our agreement
with the low bidder. This is, perhaps, unfortunate because it
does not give us an opportunity to look at the additional funds
being requested as part of your overall mid-year budget review in
February. However, in light of the history of this project and
of our conviction that rebidding and/or redesigning will not
bring the total price down, Paul and I are convinced that it
would not be in our best interests to delay it any longer.
I truly regret whatever inconvenience this will create for the
Council, but I feel just as strongly that to delay this project
further w' r
ill only end u Gostin us more and more dollars . I
Y P g
know that Council is acutely aware of the issues involved here,
so I will not re-hash the rationale for the various improvements
covered in the upgrading and renovation project.
I, therefore, urge that you accept Paul ' s recommendation, the
result of which will, obviously, impact our contingency fund and
will have to be factored into the budget review in February.
But, in my opinion, the alternatives and their ultimate conse-
quences are far worse, both financially and in terms of public
perception and employee morale.
RW: cw
MEMORANDUM •
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
Through: Ray Windsor, City Manager
From: Paul M. Sensibaugh, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Subject : Heating, Ventilating and Air Conditioning—City Hall
Date : January 16, 1989
L
mendation:
Staff recommends that the project be awarded to R. P. Richards
he amount of $558,475 and that an additional $80, 000 be
priated from the general fund balance to cover the bid amount
nspection and system balancing costs .
History:
In October of 1980 the City first received bids on the
Administration Building Renovation project . At that time it was •
anticipated that the entire project (which has changed scope over
the years) could be done under one contract . The low bid at that
time, $722 , 000, was well above the $400, 000 budgeted. The
engineer ' s (Stephenson, not Schott at that time) estimate was about
$395, 000 and the engineering cost was $50, 000 . It was decided at
that time to proceed with the project in phases and to hire Schott &
Assoc. to do the engineering.
Phase I consisted of office renovations on the first and second
floors, restroom renovation on the first and second floors, and
counters for reception and dispatch. The cost of that phase was
$145, 777 and was completed in July of 1981 . The balance of the
money has been carried over but not disturbed until the grant was
obtained in 1985 . Since 1985 two other phases have been completed.
Background:
Bids for the above project were received on November 10, 1988 .
The work includes Removal and Sealing of asbestos insulation around
piping within vertical pipe chases and piping in basement ($54, 000) ,
Construction of mechanical pad and brick masonry unit enclosure at
parking lot ($58, 000) , Mechanical Renovation (HVAC system) including
soffit work ($345, 000) , and Architectural Renovation including the
3rd Floor restroorns and painting and carpeting in some offices
($101 ,476) . •
Following is the bid summary which includes all items bid.
(Above figures reflect low bidder' s itemization. )
R. P. Richards, Inc .—Coleta. . . . . . . . . . $558,476
Young Brothers Const .—Atascadero. . . . . $583, 950
Wysong Construction—Atascadero. . . . . . . $608, 069
Spiess Construction—Santa Maria. . . . . . $624, 005
Engineer ' s Estimate—(November 30) . . . . $557,400
There is always a chance of positive change orders, but in the
case of this project we actually expect negative change orders due
to the fact that some of the cosmetic work such as painting and
carpeting has been done by the Buildings Division. The room
renovation and the restroom work, however, were bid lumped together
and negotiations will have to take place in order to decide the
amount of actual reduction to the bid. Any positive or negative
change orders are unknown at this time and the following discussion
will consider them as zero.
Attached are several pieces of correspondence regarding the
bids and the attempt to reduce the costs to the budget figure. Also
included are the November 27, 1985, January 7, 1986 , March 6, 1986
and November 30, 1988 cost estimates (which does not include the T—
bar ceilings or lighting) , the February 27, 1987 grant rejection,
the April 17, 1987 Historic Preservation Office letter demanding the
Historic Structure Report, and December 2, 1987 cost estimate for
HVAC redesign based upon the HSR.
Discussion:
The several cost estimates are confusing at best since the
project has been broken up into phases over the last three years and
costs have increased. Of the $570, 000 originally budgeted ($300, 000
grant and $270, 000 general fund) , expenditures include : $11 ,490—
Asbestos Removal in 1st Floor Ceiling, $110,721-4th Floor Structural
work, $8, 500—Historic Structure Report, and $84, 950 for Design.
(All figures above are after the grant was obtained in 1985) .
The balance for the 1988-89 budget was approximately $384, 000 .
This was an anticipated amount not having the benefit of any
knowledge of an audit or interest earned. The latest cost estimate
at that time for the work actually bid was $337, 200 . Asbestos
removal (which ranged from $16, 000 to $54, 000) was not an issue at
budget time but was raised later due to testing of materials and
recent asbestos regulation changes . Allowing 9% cost index increase
as indicated in the latest estimate the project without
contingencies should be about $367, 550 . It was anticipated at the
time that the the remaining funds would be used for construction
inspection . Note that the 1985 estimate was an "installed" price
and, therefore the Contractor ' s Fee shown in the latest estimate
should not be included.
Fiscal Impact :
Despite the above budget rationalization and the after-the-fact
engineer's estimate, the reality is that the low bid is $548,475 and
construction engineering will be about $15, 000, dependent upon the
inspection time desired on the project and the cost of the HVAC
Balance . Additionally, the Ceiling work and lighting has not been
bid due to objections and revisions from the Office of Historic
Preservation. That work is now estimated at approximately $40, 000,
plus about another $4500 for additional engineering and/or
inspection.
The original grant was $300, 000, the maximum allowable . As we
expend funds we request reimbursement from the State . This has been
done twice for a total amount of reimbursement of $182, 951 .
Therefore, the State still has $117, 049 for us and our cash on hand
is $366,482 . This gives us $483,531 available to the project , not
including interest earned on the account .
Over the last three and one half years the original $270, 000
general fund appropriation (over and above the $300, 000 grant) would
have earned over $84, 000 in interest that should be allotted to this
project . This does not include interest from 1981 to 1985, which
would be over $100, 000 . However, the difference in the amount of
cash available in the general fund/revenue sharing and the amount
actually appropriated appears to reflect recovery of that money.
Original Work Comp . Available Needed
' Grant $300, 000 $138, 000 $162, 000
Gen.Fund $270, 000 $ 9,706 $260, 293
Rev. Shar $ 0 $ 23, 004 $106, 189
Totals $570, 000 $215, 661 $483, 531 $563, 000
Therefore, an appropriation from the fund balance of $80, 000
would complete the project as bid, subject to change orders.
It should be noted that the City applied for an additional
grant in 1986 but was turned down since we already had received a
maximum grant . Since we completed the Historic Structure Report any
new grant monies received must be used to bring the building back to
its original status, including taking out all of the lowered
ceilings . The money could not be used for the work allowed in the
present grant until other cosmetic work is completed.
Options :
Staff is recommending that the City appropriate anticipated
interest money to complete the work as bid, before prices esculate
again, and to hold the remaining work until the next budget session
since the State has not given the nod for the lighting and ceilings
at this time .
0 0
Other options would be to (1) reject all bids and re-bid again,
(2) delete a portion of the work, which action would surely result
in the forfeit of a bid bond of about $34,500 or a refusal of both
the low bid and the bid bond (the next low bid is $104, 602 greater
for the HVAC item, therefore, the taking of the bid bond would still
not accomplish our goal ) , (3) reject all bids and not bid again.
FR -ED H . SCHOTT & ASSOCIATES, INC .
CML&STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Red H.SC..=PE. Kevin T Devaney
Ricnara N Koom'cy.Axh. Maarviv J.Eowarm
,I'm Suouroan Roan 805 544-1216 Leonard Haeger,&IA JJ.Emma
Sen Luis OWS00,California 93401-7589 805i929-3216 ftho R.Henry,P.E. Bran Humm
MKhael P.ftity Rwanerd J.
( Lair 8ogovCn Penn C.sd•
November 5, 1985
City of Atascadero
Post Office Box 747
Atascadero, CA 93423
Attention: Mr. Paul Sensibaugh, Director of Public Works
Subject: Cost Estimate for Phase IIA & IIB Remodel Work
at the Atascadero City Administration Building
Dear Paul:
In response to your request, we have prepared a cost estimate for
Phase IIA & Phase IIB work at the City Administration Building. The
estimate is in keeping with our recent meetings to discuss the City's
modified remodeling program and the addition of a new State grant
approved by the State Office of Historic Preservation. Our cost .
estimates are based on staff time being billed on an hourly basis of
the individuals doing the work with a "not-to-exceed° maximum figure
for each phase of the work. Our fee includes services by our
{ consulting Mechanical and Electrical Engineers. Our consulting
Mechanical Engineer is Al Nibecker & Associates and our consulting
Electrical Engineer is Mr. Alvin Smith. We have broken our estimate
down into two primary construction phases.
The general scope of construction work for Phase IIA includes the
following:
A. Asbestos removal at the first floor ceiling.
B. Total renovation of third floor men' s and women 's restrooms.
C. Structural bracing of high and low parapet walls at the fourth
floor.
D. Structural bracing of 22 ' high unreinforced masonry walls and
reinforcement of existing floor beams at the fourth floor.
PHASE IIA Professional Services
-------------------------------
1. Recent and future meetings with City staff.
2. Preparation of 1986 State Historical Grant application.
�. 3. Coordination with consultants, State Architect, and City staff.
4. Revision of Architectural, Electrical, Mechanical plans and
specifications for Phase IIA construction.
FRED H . SCHOTT & ASSOCIATES
INC .
CIVIL 3 STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Fred H.Schon,PE. KMn T.pevmuv
RK7wd N.KOCCCW.Arch. Mann w J.Edwa=
^0!�S,ourben Rom 805/544.1416 LeorWd HftW,AIA 1,1,E�Ck
San LwS ObisCo,California 93401-7589 805/949.3416 Philip R.HeW,P.E. &an mm"
0MKhm P.Baw RKhard 1.NeCpp-
Lany 8090NCh pmy C.
CITY OF ATASCADERO page 2
November 5, 1985
5. Preparation of bid packages for contractors.
Professional Services $ 9,725.00
Construction Administration Services $ 2,500.00
The general scope of construction work for Phase IIB includes the
following:
A. Install new H.V.A.C. system at all City staff offices and remote
mechanical plant with a new cooling tower, mechanical pumps, and.
boilers.
B. Install new t-bar ceiling system, ceiling lighting and wall
outlets in City staff offices where required at first, second and
third floors.
C. Install new carpeting and carpet base in City staff offices where
required at first, second and third floors.
D. Paint City staff offices where required at first, second and third
floors.
E. Construct draft stops at all vertical mechanical shafts at each
floor.
PHASE IIB Professional Services
------------------------------
1. Meetings Meetings with City Staff.
2. Coordination with consultants, State Architect, and City staff.
3. Preparation of Architectural and Electrical plans and
specifications for Phase IIB construction.
4. Preparation of Mechanical design plans and specifications of new
H.V.A.C. system for entire administration building.
5. Preparation of bid packages for contractors.
Professional Services $39,575.00 - $44,575.00
Construction Administration Services $14,600.00 - $24,600.00
7"
FRED H . SCHOTT 3 ASSOCIATES, INC .
creo H.Schott D E. Kewn T Devaney
CML a STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Rid N KOOCCW,Arch. MdM%-- J.Eawaress
?00 Suburoem Rood 805/544-1416 Leorwa Hae9er.AIA JJ.Enmck
Sem furs Obisoo,Celdmue 93401-75M 805!949-3416 Philip R.Henry,P-E. encu+14 s -
MKhw P.Bailey RK"We J.
Uary&n-*IC+ PEny C.Sehactt
CITY OF ATASCADERO page 3
November 5, 1985
We have enjoyed our past association with the City and hope that our
business relationship will continue. We hope this proposal meets with
your approval. If you have questions regarding this matter, please do
not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely yours,
�//,,FrL'Le
Fred H. Schott
RNK:ac
i
�t
RE10VED NOV 15 1985
FRED H . SCH OTT & ASS0 IATES, INC .
CML i STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS r'c'c M Soom PE- Kam T.Oevmw
QCc xC N KOoeCW.Arca. mawwvv J.EawmCs
_.0 Suturoan Rom 805,544-1216cecnaro H&CW.aIA. JJ.Emrck
Sen Luis C>C+soc.California 93401-7589 805r929-3416 Pmio R.Hew.P.E- &on Mumm
waw P Sauey Ra*.mo J.
Lary 0090ncn Perry C Schtc�
November 13 , 1985
City of Atascadero
Post Office Box 747
Atascadero, California 93423
Attention: Mr. Paul Sensibaugh
Director of Public Works
Subject: Construction Cost Estimate for Phase IIA
Remodel Work at the Atascadero City Hall
Administration Building
Dear Paul:
To supplement our letter to you dated -November 5, 1985, and
based upon the previous bids received January 31, 1985, we have
prepared a preliminary estimate of construction costs for Phase
IIA.
A. Asbestos removal at the first
floor ceiling: $ 12,000
B. Total renovation of men's and
women 's restroom at the third floor: $ 19,000
C. Fourth floor structural bracing
of high and low parapet walls, 22 ' high
unreinforced masonry walls, and
reinforcement of existing floor beams: $ 71,000
Total $102,000
Assuming that it does not jeopardize the state grant that has
been approved for the rehabilitation work, we would recommend
that Item A, asbestos removal work, be bid out separately to
qualified asbestos removal companies. The primary advantage to
the City is that there should be approximately a 20; cost
savings by the elimination of a general contractor 's overhead
and profit. Because asbestos removal work is dangerous to
FRED H . SCHOTT 8 ASOCIATES, INC . •
Civil d STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Free M.S,-h=P.E. KeAn T.Devaney
R10=N.KooeCky,A�fi. Matmew J.Eewa=
'-M Suburoan Roan SM544.1216 Leonare Meeger,A.6k 1.1.Emnac
San Luis Ob+soo,California 93401-7589 805,1929-3216 Philip IL Henry,P.E. Brien HmM
( M,ctied P.Bodey Reye J_
;*
Larry 8090wcn PC-V C.
CITY OF ATASCADERO page 2
November 13 , 1985
anyone not properly protected, we are specifying that the work
be done during non City business hours to eliminate any
possibility of a freak accident involving the City staff or
general public. This requirement will also allow the City staff
to function in a normal manner without interruption or
inconvenience. If you disagree with this approach, please
advise us at your earliest convenience.
Sincerely yours,
( Fred H. Schott
FHS:rcds
AL MUCKS & ASSOCIMS, INC*
CONSULTING MECHANICAL ENGINEERS
NOVEMBER 21, 1985
FRED SCHOTT AND ASSOCIATES
200 SUBURBAN ROAD
SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIF. 93401
ATTENTION: MR. RICHARD KOPECKI
SUBJECT: ATASCADERO ADMINISTRATION BUILDING--MECHANICAL SYSTEMS DESIGN
DEAR RICHARD:
AS DISCUSSED, TWO DIFFERENT MECHANICAL SYSTEMS FOR THE ADMINISTRATION BUILDING
HAVE BEEN DESIGNED. THIS HAS TAKEN PLACE OVER THE LAST SIX YEARS. EITHER
SYSTEM WILL ADEQUATELY FULFILL THE PROJECT REQUIREMENTS AS DESIGNED.
UNDERSTANDABLY, THE CLIENT HAS SOME QUESTIONS AS TO WHY A THIRD MECHANICAL
SYSTEMS DESIGN FOR CONDITIONING THE BUILDING HAS BEEN PROPOSED. THE PURPOSE
OF THIS LETTER IS TO RECOUNT THE HISTORY OF THE PROJECT AND TO CLOSE WITH THE
OPTIONS FOR MEETING THE PROJECT'S MECHANICAL NEEDS.
AS IT STANDS, THE EXISTING STEAM SYSTEM IS INADEQUATE TO SERVICE THE BUILDING.
THE PIPING IS OLD AND LEAKING. MUCH OF THE INSULATION IS EITHER NON-EXISTANT
OR IN POOR SHAPE. CORROSION HAS FOULED MUCH OF THE PIPING AND HEAT
EXCHANGERS. BASICALLY, THE EXISTING SYSTEM IS CLD AND UNABLE TO MEET THE
BUILDING DEMANDS. IT HAS PROBABLY BEEN QUITE A MAINTENANCE AND OPERATING TASK
TO KEEP THE HEATING SYSTEM Ov-LINE.
APPROXIMATELY SIX YEARS AGO, IT WAS DECIDED TO RENOVATE THE ADMINISTRATION
BUILDING. THE BASIC REQUIREMENT FOR THE MECHANICAL SYSTEM WAS TO DESIGN AN
INSTALLATION FOR HEATING THE BUILDING WITH THE PROVISION FOR ADDING AIR
CONDITIONING AT A LATER DATE. A FEW SELECTED AREAS, SUCH AS DATA PROCESSING,
WERE TO RECEIVE AIR CONDITICONIING DURING THIS DESIGN PHASE. THE FOURTH ST11RY
AREA WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE WORK; AND A MAJOR PORTION OF THE WORK INVOLVED
THE COMPLETE RENOVATION OF THE BASEMEIT WHICH WAS TO BE THE NEW POLICE
DEPARTMENT.
THE BUILDING HAS AMPLE PIPE CHASES FOR THE EXISTING STEAM SYSTEM.
ADDITIONALLY, AT THE TIME, THE EXISTING BOILER WAS FAIRLY NEW AND COULD BE
RETAINED. THE LOGIGAL CHOICE FOR THE HEATING (AND LATER AIR CONDITIONING) THE
BUILDING WAS A 'HYDRONIC' SYSTEM UTILIZING HOT WATER FOR HEATING AND WITH THE
PROVISION FOR THE INSTALLATION OF FUTURE CHILLED WATER COOLING. SUCH A SYSTEM
CIRCULATED HOT WATER THOUGH-OUT THE BUILDING. THE HOT WATER IS SUPPLIED
THROUGH FAN COILS IN EACH ZONE WHICH PROVIDES FOR FORCED AIR HEATING. THE FAN
COILS WERE SPECIFIED WITH BOTH HEATING AND COOLING COILS BUT THE CHILLED WATER
PIPING SYSTEM WAS NUT DESIGtiED FOR THIS PHASE OF THE PROJECT. SUCH A SYSTEM
IS EASILY EXPANDABLE AND ,PROVIDES FOR COMPLETE THERMOSTATIC CONTROL IN ALL
MAIN OFFICE 935 Riverside. Unit 19 • Paso Robles.CA 93446 0 (805) 239-3666
BRANCH OFFICE 155 Granada St,Suite A 0 Camarillo,CA 93010 0 (805)987-3410
ZONES. THE BASEMENT AND PERIMETER AREAS OF THE FIRST THREE FLOORS WERE
INCLUDED IN THE DESIGN. THE PRESENT MUSEUM AREA AND ENTIRE FOURTH FLOOR, AS
STATED, WERE TO BE INCLUDED AT A LATER DATE.
LATER, THE SCOPE OF THE PROJECT WAS GREATLY REDUCED. A DECISION WAS MADE TO
PLACE THE POLICE DEPARTMENT ELSEWHERE AND THE ENTIRE MECHANICAL SYSTEM FOR
HEATING AND VENTILATING THE BASEMENT BECAME OBSOLETE. APPARENTLY, THE
AVAILABLE FUNDS WERE APPLIED FIRST TO THE ARCHITECTURE AND INTERIOR DESIGN OF
THE NEW OFFICE LAY-OUT. THE RENOVATION OF THE BUILDING'S PLUMBING SYSTEMS WAS
INSTALLED AS DESIGNED BUT THE HEATING SYSTEM WAS TO BE SIGNIFICANTLY MODIFIED.
THIS OFFICE WAS REQUESTED TO FORMULATE PLANS FOR THE LEAST EXPENSIVE SOLUTION
TO THE EXISTING HEATING PROBLEM, WITHOUT REGARD FOR CENTRAL AIR CONDITIONING.
OUR DESIGN RETAINED THE MAIN PIPING AND BOILER ROOM ADDITIONS FROM THE
ORIGINAL DESIGN BUT COMPLETELY ELIMINATED ALL THE FAN COILS, DUCTING, AND
CONTROLS AS ORIGINALLY DESIGNED. IN PLACE OF THIS EWIPMENT, SELF REGULATING
HOT WATER BASEBOARDS WERE CHOOSEN AS THE LEAST COSTLY ALTERNATIVE.
THIS WORK WAS COMPLETED APPROXIMATELY ONE YEAR AGO.
APPARENTLY, F=S HAVE BEEN MANE AVAILABLE FOR BOTH HEATING AND -AIR
CONDITIONING A SIZABLE PORTION OF THE BUILDING. THE BASEMENT, WITH THE
EXCEPTION OF A FEW AREAS TO BE HEATED, IS NO LONGER A MAJOR PORTION OF THE
'1.
WORK. THE FOURTH FLOOR COUNCIL AREA HAS BEEN ADDED TO THE PROJECT.
IF A MECHANICAL SYST&i IS TO BE INSTALLED WHICH HAS COMPLETE AIR CONDITIONING
AND HEATING SERVICES, A SUBSTANTIAL SAVINGS CAN BE REALIZED BY UTILIZING A
'WATER-SOURCE HEAT PUMP' INSTALLATION. ALL DESIGN WORK TO DATE DOES NOT
INCLUDE CENTRAL PLANT AIR CONDITIONING. AIR CONDITIONING CAN BE DESIGNED WITH
THE ORIGINAL WORK, AND THE PLANS CAN BE EXPANDED TO INCLUDE THE FOURTH FLOOR
CAND DELETE THE BASEMENT). THE FINAL INSTALLATION WILL BE EXPENSIVE, HOWEVER.
A 'ROUGH' ESTIMATE FOR THE INSTALLED COST FOR THE HYDRONIC-FAN COIL
INSTALLATION IS ABOUT $265,000.
THE PROPOSED WATER SOURCE HEAT PUMP SYSTEM UTILIZES TWO UNINSULATED "WATER
PIPES INSTEAD OF THE FOUR INSULATED PIPES REQUIRED FOR THE FAN-COIL
INSTALLATION. ADDITIONALLY, THE SIZE AND COMPLEXITY OF THE CENTRAL MECHANICAL
PLANT AND CONTROLS ARE GREATLY DECREASED. WHILE THE WATER SOURCE HEAT PUMP
SYSTEM IS MORE EXPENSIVE THAN THE ORIGINAL DESIGN DUE TO THE REQUIREMENT FOR
AIR CONDITIONING, THE INSTALLATION WILL BE LESS EXPENSIVE WHEN BOTH HEATING
AND AIR CONDITIONING ARE REQUIRED. A ROUGH ESTIMATE FOR THE INSTALLED COST OF
THE WATER SOURCE HEAT PUMP INSTALLATION IS $195,000.
ADDITIONALLY, ENERGY USE WILL BE MUCH BETTER WITH THE NATER SOURCE HEAT PUMP
SYSTEM. THE INSTALLATION HAS THE ABILITY TO USE ENERGY REJECTED FROM ONE ZONE
TO HEAT OR COOL A DIFFERENT AREA. IT IS ESTIMATED THAT THE WATER SOURCE
INSTALLATION WILL REQUIRE ABOUT 20-30 PERCENT LESS ENERGY THAN THE STANDARD
FOUR-PIPE HYDRONIC INSTALLATION.
IN SUMMARY, THE ORIGINAL WORK CAN NOW BE EXPANDED TO INCLUDE CENTRAL PLANT AIR
CONDITIONING. ALSO, THE WORK CAN BE REVISED TO SERVICE THE FORTH FLOOR, THE
INTERIOR PORTIONS OF THE STRUCTURE, AND TO DELETE THE 'WORK IN MOST OF THE
BASEMENT. HOWEVER,IF A FULL HEATING AND AIR CONDITIONING PLANT IS NOW
REQUIRED, THE OPTION OF THE WATER SOURCE HEAT PUMP INSTALLATION IS A BETTER
CHOICE. BOTH THE 'FIRST-COST' AND OPERATING COST FOR THIS SYSTEM ARE BETTER.
BOTH OPTIONS WILL REQUIRE THE INSTALLATION OF A MECHANICAL PLANT IN SOME AREA
ADJACENT TO THE BUILDING.
FOR ADEQUATELY HEATING AND AIR CONDITIONING THE BUILDING, BOTH- SYSTEMS
DISCUSSED WILL BE APPROPRIATE. EITHER INSTALLATION WILL REQUIRE SUBSTANTIAL
ALTERATION OF THE EXISTING DRAWINGS. IT IS FELT THAT THIS WORK WOULD BE BEST
APPLIED TO A MECHANICAL SYSTEM WHICH BEST MEETS THE PROJECT REQUIREMENTS AS
THEY ARE NOW DEFINED.
HOPEFULLY, THE ABOVE INFORMATION WILL BE HELPFUL TOWARDS COMPLETING THE
PROJECT. YOUR QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS WILL BE APPRECIATED.
INCE ;Y, i
J
A.F. NIBECKER PE
AFN/BT
f
FRED H . SCHOTT A ASSOCIATES, INC .
RIVED DEC 2 ;°35
CIVIL 6 STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS FMC H.Schott,RF_ Kem T.0e ow
R<harC N K000M,ArM. Mawwkv J.Ewwa=
2200 Suburban Rood 805/544.1416 Ltoro►o HaeW,ALL J.J.EmnCK
San Luis Clbisoo,Cahfomia 93401.7S89 8051949.3416 Phdop R.Hemy,P.E. Bron HusErwJ
mcw D.Batley Richard J:
terry Pr+ry C.Schacht
November 27, 1985
City of Atascadero
Post Office Box 747
Atascadero, California 93423
Attention: Mr. Paul Sensibaugh, Director of Public Works
Subject: Phase IIC Remodel Work at the
Atascadero City Administration Building
Dear Paul:
Since our last meeting, we have been in contact with Mr. Al
Nibecker, our Mechanical Consultant, to discuss your concerns
regarding the proposed H.V.A.C. system for all City staff offices
and the 4th floor rotunda. We requested a written statement from
him that outlines the history of the various mechanical
improvement plans prepared over the past 5 or 6 years and a cost
comparison of the most recently designed mechanical system versus
the proposed "water source heat pump" system. We have enclosed a
copy of Mr. Nibecker's letter to us for your use and information.
We emphasize that the "rough" estimates for the "hydropic-fan
coil" system and the "water-source heat pump" system should be
considered for relative comparisons only. Until a new system is
designed and drawings prepared so that material quantities can be
determined, it is impossible for Mr. Nibecker to give us* anything
more than a very rough estimate of mechanical costs.
If you feel it desireable, Mr. Nibecker could be present at the
next City Council meeting when the Phase IIC improvements are
discussed. He can answer any specific questions that the Council
might ask regarding the mechanical design work. If you concur,
please advise us as soon as possible so we may notify him well in
advance.
In order to avoid any future confusion, we have elected to
reorganize our identification of the different improvement phases
to the City Administration Buildings. Phase IIA will be divided
into Phase IIA and IIB. The new Phase IIA will include only
asbestos removal work. The new Phase IIB will include all
improvements to the third floor public restrooms, structural
bracing of high and low " fourth floor parapet walls and 22 ' high
unreinforced masonry walls at' the fourth floor, and reinforcement
FRED H . SCHOTT >!i ASSOVATES, INC .
CML 6 STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Fred H.Schon P.E. Kenn T.DrArwy
RiChard N.K=CMY.ArCh. mat flew J.Edwerm
_00 Suburban Roel 805/544-1416 Leonard Haeyer,AIA J.J.Errrick
San Luis Obispo,California 93401-7589 805!949-3416 Philip R.Flory,D.E. Brian KA"
AAKhael P.Batley Richard J-NeCCw`n
Larry 6090Vch Pwy C SChwi(
CITY OF ATASCADERO page 2
November 27, 1985
of existing floor beams at the fourth floor. The old Phase IIB
will become Phase IIC. This phase will include the installation
of a new S.V.A.C. system in all staff offices at the 1st, 2nd,
3rd and 4th floor rotunda. In addition, new carpeting, carpet
base, painting, t-bar ceiling, lighting, and additional electrical
wall outlets at all "future" City staff offices at the 1st, 2nd
and 3rd floors that are presently unimproved.
We have enclosed our rough estimate of Phase IIC improvements for
your use. You will note that Item 4 is listed as $250,000 instead
of $195,000 as previously stated by Mr. Nibecker. We requested
an ultra conservative estimate from him and it was $2501,000.
Therefore, we listed the higher figure.
In closing, we have reevaluated our estimate for Phase IIC
professional services. These services include our mechanical and
electrical consultants and supercede our letter of November 5,
1985 outlining our not-to-exceed cost estimate for Phase IIB
Professional Services.
1. Professional Design Services: $36,575.00 - $40 ,575.00
2. Construction Administration Services: $14,600.00 - $20,600.00
If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact
use
Sincerely yours,
Richard N. opecky
Chief Architect
RNK:rcds .
Enclosures:
C
as
FRED H . SCHOTT S ASSOCIATES, INC .
CML&STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS RM H.Schott.P.E. Kevin T Devaney
Richard N.Kopecky,Arch. Matthew J.Eawerrss
:00 Suburban Road 805/544-1416 Leonaro Hae9d.A A JJ.EnrKk
San Luis Obrsoo,California 93401-7589 805/949-3416 Philip R.Henry,P.E. Bnan HustrKJ
` MKrteel P.Barky Richard J.
►my 8090vKh Perry C.Schacfu
CITY OF ATASCADERO
November 27, 1985
ATASCADERO CITY HALL PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
FOR PHASE IIC IMPROVEMENTS
November 27, 1985
SCOPE OF WORK: Installation of new "Water Source Seat-Pump"
H.V.A.C. System with complete electric service at 1st, 2nd, 3rd
and 4th floor rotunda; remote equipment pad and fenced enclosure
for H.V.A.C. cooling tower, boilers and pumps; installation of
plaster draft stops at all vertical mechanical chases of each
floor; new carpeting, carpet base, painting, t-bar ceiling,
lighting, and extra surface mounted duplex electrical wall outlets
at all future City staff offices at 1st, 2nd, and 3rd floors not
presently improved.
1. Bond: $ 3,200.00
2. Mobilization: $ 5,300.00
3. Lath & Plaster (Draft Stop Work) : $ 20,400.00
4. H.V.A.C. (Water Source Heat Pump System) : $250,000.00
5. H.V.A.C. Electrical Service: $ 16,000.00
6. Paint (Staff Office Areas) : $ 16,800.00 ,
7. Carpet & Carpet Base (Staff Office Areas) : $ 20,000.00
8. Acoustic T-Bar Ceiling (Staff office Areas) : $ 9,700.00
9. Ceiling Lighting/Extra Electrical Outlets
(Staff Office Areas) : $ 25,000.00
10. Remote Mechanical Equipment Area: $ 5,500.00
Sub-Total: $371, 900.00
los Contingency: $ 37,200.00
TOTAL: $409F100.00
------
ah
MA
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Council
THROUGH: Mike Shelton, City Manager
FROM: Paul Sensibaugh, Director of Public Works/City- Engineer
SUBJECT: City Hall Renovation Project: Advertisement for-Bids and
Authorization for Consulting Agreement. -.
DATE: . January .7, t 1986
-77
Recommendation
:.Staff, recommends..,that (a) 'authorization be given ..to. advertise
..".for .Bids for the various .phases',.of=::the prof ect, '-and .(b) Y authorization
-.be given to the Public:Works Director' to.,enter into"an agreement-..with '
Fred Shott'& Associates for the final .design of Phase IIC HVAC and
Interior Renovation. a-
Background:
-- '- Enclosed is.-background information. from Fred Shott 'and Al 77,
Nibecker regarding the itemization of--construction costs 'and con-
sultation and inspection fees.
The State Historical 'Preservation office --..has a deadline on
expending their funds, thus it behooves the City to move the project
along quickly. ,
..,�
The new HVAC system for•"all floors,-• the.;fire-proofing or draft ,
stop work,'` the ceiling work,''painting,`' carpeting 'and other
. Miscellaneous work .need to be .designed sand. prepared for bidding.
The asbestos removal, 3rd floor,,restroom xenovation;x`•and the�, �
`4th floor. structural work , includi.ng parapet walls is nowr:Wready .for dMx
bid, subject to SHPO review. r. `
Discussiono: , �� �k ,•.,�,�;ti� .r 6
ZA$— Z': •h..'ur ` ..n ...h. i,}+.F�v.h_ a, t .jyti•};'yam+ ,, •.
, r.t'."• .-�'�" s. `.:3.�q'7,yY?�;f '.r�+.,t'Ji '�'.':� 1'.- �`rp„:r� �'IC,�`!r—�rR'”->� *r ,c q�3i�?.•it:
j,Shott„& =Assoc..,are ..asking:direction-'from,staff:=for Ythe 3final
room arrangements;;-Mi6luding ;,the", unci'1 :Chambers .location: These '"Z
idecisions will ;have;. to;be,made.with-in the next.:two ,weeks`-so�,that '
., » ylr.�. -rt �, e +ar•s+^it
redesigning will--noir a necessary . d n
.,_Tt . ••,,�4.t, - Ma v�p •q,�...^ ,a r4. +ys,!
T +N• 'r L -.i.ac7t1� $» `., k"s xr•iS.N "' v ,ix ,v 4�1F A .y t`}rF Ty9{
��, .c ''- •a+".f s+4 a:»+viar.,,r...w.Msec ...�::.S'�,.. w•#W¢++g��Fg.�t wfl�uyrn� r:t �
The 'SHPO` hasr'nixed "the -1 ea of;the .mezanine enclosure :on-the e�y .:�3
r 2nd ,floor._ and~at,..this stage�`the internal reconstruc..tiori fo"i'�
h , r 1!, ..r.Nf t�, - w rpt•>
.. •_police rooms' on•4the �Zn loom have been eYminated
r
' Ate. Xly tit o
Fiscal Impact:
Phase IIA & IIB Construction $102,000
Phase IIA & IIB Design 12-,225*
Phase IIC Construction 371,900
Phase IIC Design (Maximum) ' 61,175**
-.Total Project Estimate — '��. .. $547,300
* Previously' Authorized . ..
** Negotiated down by $8,000
City Budget $270,000
Grant Funds 300,000
'..Total Project Budget $5701000
This.,willallow only $22,700 :for ,con tingencies, but'the
-;estimates'- for, the::HVAC are._considered:conservative:
�' u• `;je '..ap ' '.M.}• 'a.'�n hs-+.4 -1r.,kic '01 1-c .?rt h^•,S y.`
J� J}i -w''�i,s�• p �? "i.r.} ':+�..s 1:' ..s.�v+'� 'f/ .�. ?3"� _ +Bw r:i�a'<:.w ..
# t SUMMARY
Design Construction
Phase Description Cost Cost
IIA Asbestos RemodalJWor k
J
IIB 3rd Floor
improvements - restrooms
Y 1
a rJ
structural
al
bracin °of hiah'-'h � lew4th ..>,
- .
•
-floor:,parapet'walls and 22'-+*-hiah 'uii= -'- � <r•` L "1
reinforced masonry walls on '3rd floor
and reinforcement of existing floor
> � s4beams ate the 4th' floore
.'Combinatiori'.-IIA & IIB '"' 12',250 _ r
,.,
$ '$IO2",000
IIC r �HVAC .;new carpeting, carpet=base, shy"` " 3� 5•'3:i�f ,;a.{
c < painting,` T-bare ceilinct,':lfdhtinQ
„ and additional electrical wall v� ''` =� M `'� •� �.��. '�
{ oors . $61,175 Y. 950
50
1 � < 1 L"i, r._�ik r �'+ - .1 v s7l.w •�.+MVt � �x"+ •4"..
1 a a 'dj .fl y> $ '�i •; }Y tl +•., t , .L , i 1 X:1 �.+•k;}+ir ..
1�V t ,y.. + ` 1,.: a Lr^Sttr tM J.}��., :. �J.]yr�k r.,� i hi,,,.t!ir. r�;z ♦a • -.�. � .�'� ,7 .(�: v,y�Y..K �sM -. ._
•(�,k`t'K. r := �'�t• ..i�tycti�t'.�' S.aN'.at.','�vfi.+( t.. �.'v.`vt�r•, Q`� 7 -';s?- '�r•?A � �kC �k�r• ra aid.
i •;� Staf fyrIS requesting'A)t author�za oir'{ to`advertise four��o
♦ C • • .�..nrr-e .+ tacw.-:. 4qr sir -C+yr
struction bid's :for- Phase"IIA and:IIB" (estimate cost t$1Q2,QOOk 'anc ,
B) .:ao ;enter~- nto'y�an'a�reementx wi
' th'�=FrecY-Schott�1 ��ssbd=for'�firi
* - w �t �r • a:!•y'► .War•. +y.. t ..e <� t 5:'
desian of Phase IIC (estimated cost nat"to exceed $6I„1f
L( _a
1 `;+ { wF-s--:a� r ' + '•�►t ��.: � •, .t ♦...-°� ,a t �; ,• ka;iR x . �
;• sem..-� a ,t; ane �+.Y
•,a' 11 '" L} !M �.ii lc�...}7E:� k• � �M��1i[i�'� r
'j KL� +kms+tom ► a� {_,y ; � � /�y tom. , y, � r ...r:. 5
3-+.FE£`{', �_y'1i.a
a.
tLr-. l..,ti..r/4:.L+•sa{ksaY" .�toii .k" '�' �Ef�
. •i
RECEIVED MAR 6086
STATE OF CALIFORNIA—THE RESOURCES AGENCY GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN,Governor
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION ,
F.O. 80X 2990 -:
OACUMENTO 95811
February 27,, 1986
Paul Sensibaugh
City of Atascadero
P.O. Box 747
Atascadero, CA 93423
Subject: Administration Building
Dear Paul:
Thank you for submitting an application for grant funds for the above
project through the historic preservation component of the California
Park and Recreational Facilities Act of 1984, 1896 cycle.
I regret to inform you that we were unable to include this project in
the list recommended to the Legislature for funding this year. We
received 130 applications for a total of $18 million. The $3 million
allocated for this year's program has 32 projects recommended for
funding, most of them for amounts less than requested.
The competetive ranking for this program was such that many good
projects ranked lower than others. Your project was not reachable
with available funds. Staff in the Office of Historic Preservation
at (916) 445-8006 will be glad to discuss your application for possible
modifications for resubmittal in the next funding cycle.
Your concern and commitment to preserving this important historic
resource is greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
Wm. S. Briner
Director
• ! _�,
z
MEMORANDUM -
TO: City Council
THROUGH: Mike Shelton, City Manager
FROM: Paul Sensibaugh, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
SUBJECT: Building Renovation - Staff Report
DATE: March 6, 1986
Activity-Description Eng. Estimate Status
Phase IIA - Asbestos Removal $12,000 Contract awarded
Begin removal by
end of month.
Phase IIB - Structural and 90,000 Comments received
3rd Floor Restroom Plans now being
revised. Anticipate
Bid in April
Phase IIC - HVAC and Room 371,900 Under Design
Renovation
All Phases - Engineering 73,400 HVAC & Room Renov-
ation now being
designed.
Total Project Estimate $547,300
Total Project Budget 570,000
Available Contingency Monies $ 22,700
STATE'OF CALIFORNIA—THE RESOURCES AGENCY GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN.Csov rnor
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
*.o. eox sago
CRAMENTO 91#11
(916) 445-8006
April 17, 1987
Mr. Paul M. Sensibaugh
Director of Public Works
City Engineer
P.O. Box 747
Atascadero, CA 93423
Dear Paul :
Atascadero City Hall Bond Act Grant Project
Please excuse the delay in my sending a written confirmation of our discussion of
January 8, during my on-site inspection. I have been in telephone contact with
the project architect, Mark Moore, and reaffirmed the issues which we discussed at
our meeting. -
{
The Office of Historic Preservation administers the Historic Preservation
Component: California Park and Recreational Facilities Act of 1984 for the
purpose of preserving the most significant resources in the State of California.
The highly competitive and limited funds available under this program are
distributed for the purpose of assuring that the architectural and historical
integrity of these significant resources is preserved in perpetuity. These are
not "public works" grants, these funds should make the difference between a
standard public works project and a quality preservation project. They are to be
used in combination with local public funds already budgeted for the
rehabilitation of a civic building. The Atascadero City Hall project application
met these goals and therefore received the highest award possible under the
1984 Bond. It is for these reasons that vie are committed to working with you to
design the most sympathetic preservation project possible.
We are aware that the City acquired the building from the County after they had
done some very intrusive work. However, to continue in the same incremental
fashion would not be in the best interest of the resource and will only acerbate
the mistakes which have already been made. Therefore, it would be inappropriate
for either the City or this office to initiate any further increment of work on
this important civic building without understanding the overview for the entire
preservation of the resource.
For these reasons. I recommended at our meeting and have reaffirmed to Mr. Moore
that a Historic Structures Report be compiled as soon as possible. An outline for
such a report is enclosed. The documentation for a fine report exists within
Mr. Paul M. Sensibaugh
Page 2 ;
Ap ri 1 17, 1987
the museum on the first floor of the buildings. Volunteer work in coordination
with the architectural work from Mr. Moore could develop a useful document that
would serve to guide the City Council , the architect, and this Office, and could
be developed into a sale publication for the museum as well . Based on the
Historic.Structures Report, schematic drawings of the overall restoration of the
building for a multi-phased project for several years, if need be, could be
developed. Out of these selected working drawings for the increments of work for
which funds are available from a variety of sources, including the 1984 Bond,
should be developed as those funds become available. The first priority, from the
City's point of view, could be the mechanical system to make the building more
comfortable. The heating and mechanical systems, however, should not be installed
in an incremental fashion which might preclude the best and most economical design
solutions for the future.
We are-aware of the City Council 's concern that they may have involved themselves
in a .program which requires the expansion of the project scope beyond their
original intentions. However, the purpose of this grant program and its
requirements were clearly outlined in the grant application, procedural guide, and
project agreement. If, after reading this letter and understanding the goals and
objectives of the Office of Historic Preservation and the 1984 Bond Act, the City
Council chooses to withdraw from the rest of the program, the Office of Historic 0
(, Preservation will be happy to revise the scope of work in the project agreement
to that already completed. The City would be absolved from further obligation
upon return of the remaining money. Please understand, however, that by entering
into the contract agreement in the first place and having received funds from this
Office., you have committed to this Office's review in the future. We are
concerned that all work done on this property whether incremental or interrelated
be done according to the Secretary of the Interior's Standards.
If you have any further questions, do not hesitate to contact me at the above
number.
Sincerely,
'��,)
Ms. Marion Mitchell :Wilson
Supervisor, Survey and Local Assistance
Office of Historic Preservation
Y-457IH
Enclosure
0
Fred H. Schott & Associates, Inc.
CMI&STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING•LAND PLANNING&ARCHITECTURE
November 16, 1988
Mr. Paul Sensibaugh, Director of Public Works
City of Atascadero
P. 0. Box 747
Atascadero, CA 93423
Subject: Atascadero City Hall Renovation IIC
Bid Recommendation
Dear Paul:
Four prime contractors submitted bids on November 10, 1988 for the Atascadero City Hall
Renovation IIC; they are as follows: ,
1. Young Brothers Construction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $583,950
2. Wysong Construction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 608,069
3. R. P. Richards, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 558,476
4. Spiess Construction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 624,005
After extensive review of the bids received and with consideration of the limited funds
available, it is our recommendation that the City delete Item 7 on the Bid Proposal Form
(revised 11/04/88), Architectural Renovation, and enter into a contract for Items 1, 3,
4, and 6. The.low bidder for these items is R. P. Richards at $457,000. The second low
bidder is Young Brothers Construction at $484,107. The third low bidder is Wysong
Construction at $492,528. The fourth low bidder is Spiess Construction at $508,315.
There are two.other alternatives available to the City, but we do not believe they would
be in the best interest of the City. These alternatives are as follows:
1. The City could accept the low bidder for each of the 4 Items. This results in a
theoretically possible low contract cost of $379,505. If the two contractors agreed
to the splitting of the work, it would result in having to contract with two contrac-
tors who would have to cooperate with the City as well as their competitors. The
bids each have given in their respective Items are uncharacteristically low leading
us to believe each would withdraw their bid. This is an alternative we strongly
recommend against.
2. The second alternative would be to reject all bids. Three of the four bids received
contain addition errors constituting just reason for rejection. We do not recommend
this alternative as the City has worked 5 years to get to this point. Costs have
steadily risen and -rill continue to rise. Therefore, we feel rejection of the bids
would be counterproductive.
We recommend that the City accept the overall low bid of R. P. Richards, Inc. and enter
into a contract with them.
SAN LUIS ONSPO OFRCE (805)5441216 SANTA MARIA OFFICE (805)925.3433
200 Suburban Roof.Suite A • San Luis Obispo.Colifornia 93401 222 West Cormen Lone.Suite 104 • Santa Mona.Ca6tornia 93453
Fred H. Schott & Associates, Inc. Fred K SChoff,PE Fred M.Morena
CIVIL&STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING•LAND PLANNING&ARCHITECTURE Leonard G AJA Gonzalo Fled oso
Larry G.Bo�Arch David C.Poulson
SAN LUIS OBISPO OFFICE (805)544-1216 Mark A.Moore,Arch Clarence Q Room
200 Suburbon Rood.Suite A • San Luis Ct:npo,Cofitornio 93401 Kmart I Devaney,P.6 Andrew.1 Schott
SANTA MARIA OFFICE (805)925-3433 a e R BoderM.Guthrie.P.E. Matthew T Schott
ed
222 west Carmen lone.Suite 104 • Sonic Mona.Catitomro 93454 John F Cotton KoftMA Philip lbysW k
etr
Keith F.DeLopp D.Wy
Terry Goodgine Gregm
December .2, 1987
Paul Sensibaugh, Director of Public Works
City of Atascadero
Post Office Box 747
Atascadero, California 93423
Subject: Atascadero City Hall Rehabilitation Phase IIC
Mechanical System Revision
Dear Paul :
We have received a verbal cost estimate for the additional work
required to modify the mechanical drawings. Vic Waytek, of
Al Nibecker . and Associates, gave us a- verbal quote of $2,500 .00 .
This would include all work required to revise the mechanical plan
as we have indicated in our preliminary design revisions and would
take approximately two weeks (10 working days) to complete.
Please advise us, at your earliest convenience, as to how the City
would like to proceed. If it is the City's intention to proceed
with the mechanical revisions, we will contact both Mr. Waytek
and Mr. Steade Craigo, Office of Historic Preservation.
. If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact
us .
Sincerely yours,
Mark A. Moore
Chief Architect
MAM:mns
1
November 16, 1988
Mr. Paul Sensibaugh Page 2
tie hope this letter helps the City make their decision on which way to proceed. If
you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
got,
Mark A. Moore
Architect
MAM:nsb
0 l.rra r.rr�'i.rats r rare i.r,r�.rr. M Yr,„Y�s.. L wn.u.•Yuw.�.. ria rr� a.rY.r+�� _ �, Y
Q aM r•r �p�r r.w�. rr.�rr.ar twat.r+r.rw a.rwsr Kr�,.rr ar r. N.� \�.- ,
•Y ws i.K �YY Y..�� a.w.rrr.a Y�� V{..V `
16
W1ai.L
.r�Ur�s t`I��J• �%t•� �2,3w�Qr7L� 1�- �ii9''� �'�r��'� �1Oi14rl� "Gm`'e�a. �1�1 .+` roK��"i7 o$�r-LTD .�„iL
AgraL
77.
'll°JDN� i'✓,'�lt:±�. .%.;.'�2^.:7 ��.,;;arG_^�7 '� �!7 ifs ��I � ��i ,..i � �G e, !_�:
G.C Z�ist'^r:�� GR��S C� "✓.t0^,��^-_%..T.f ��•DD9 i!'Jr D?.ii :lT.r t✓G^ 'i'I�G�' �;`� �� �7?.6� isat C”
�t�l%�.�. GD`:% <. iq••'?''�.c:�p la?�,iGr�2GT ?^..'..::0 �jD;��`J j �;oJJc730 �;� ♦oq �iGQ:.� ��. � 6 3 O
UNIT PRic;• NoT elv�l� ,
r
AhAlso.
NNW
R.P.RICHARDS
CONSTRUCTION CO.
A DIVISION OF R.P.RICHARDS,INC.
CALIFORNIA LICENSE NO.199946
Novaamber 17 , 1988 RPR082
Ci-_Y cf Atascadero
5500 Palma Avenue
Atascadero, Ca 93421
Attention: Mr. Paul Sensibaugh, Director of Public Works
Re: Atascadero City Hall 2C Renovation
Subject: Bid Summary
Dear Paul:
As previously discussed during our teiecon November 15 ,
1788 , we indicated the complications that we experienced at
bid time for the above-referenced project on November 10 ,
1938 . We would like to review our bid proposal with You and
Fred Schott at your earliest. convenience.
It is cur understanding that you will defer the
recommendation to the City Council until December 13 , 1988
at which time the above-referenced project will be reviewed.
Please call and advise regarding a meeting time that will be
conducive to your schedule to discuss our bid proposal in
further detail.
If lou have any further questions , please do not hesitate to
call .
Sincerely,
'filbert M. om
Manager of Cor ..uction
AMG/mac
cc: F. Schott
R.P. Richards , Inc.
File: Bid 18 File
Isolated Correspondence
5949 HOLLISTER AVENUE GOLETA,CALIFORNIA 93117 TELEPHONE:(805)683-1511 FAX:(805)967-5056
low
R.P. RICHARDS
CONSTRUCTION CO.
A DIVISION OF R.P.RICHARDS.INC.
CALIFORNIA LICENSE NO.199946
!Tovember 12 . 19E8 RPR oSi
Fred H. Schott ad Associates , Inc .
Civil rz Structural Engineers
200 Suburban Road, Suite A
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
Attention: Mr. Fred H. Schott
RE: Atascadero City Hall 2C Renovation
Subject: Bid Summary
Dear :red:
This letter will serve as confirmation to our telecon on
1ovember ll , 19.0.3 regarding summary of our bid as proposed
or, Nova-ber 10 , 198S . for the above-referenced project .
We are in receipt of the bid summary as developed by yol:r
firm (see attached) whic:-1 indicates the cost breakdowns -for
line items numbers 1-7 . A review of the bid summary
indicates our firm, R.P. Richards Construction is the
apparent low bidder with a low bid of 554 , 476.00 .
As I expressed to you earlier, the bid for this project was
very complicated due to the seven line items that were
required in the contract documents . During bid day the
pricing by the subcontractors was very sporadic and
intermittent, which we believe was due to the quantity of
line iters indicated. As the bid time approached, we were
experiencing some difficulties in the tabulation of our
numbers which unfortunately did not allow us sufficient tire
to review in detail to ensure that all of the lire items
received proper distribution of general conditions , profit,
and overhead. we are aware the City of Atascadero does
reserve the right to award or delete in any combination
thereof , any of the line items as indicated in page two of
the bid proposal form.
Referring once again to the bid summary form, we did
experience some difficulties in the distribution of our
costs for the line iters , specifically line item number 6 .
Provided is our actual cost breakdown for each- line item we
would like to use:
5949 HOLLISTER AVENUE GOLETA,CALIFORNIA 93117 TELEPHONE:(805)683-1511 FAX:(805)967-5056
V
1 . 8 , 000 . 00 '
3. Deleted
r , eoo . 00 '
4 . 19 , 000 . 00"
5 . <10, 000 . 00>
6 .
42_4 , 000 - 00 -
—7 . 1071 , 4716 .00 -
in
07 , 476 .00 -in the event the City of Atascadero does choose to award to
our firm line iter. 6 on'_y, R.P . Richards Construction will
experience e%tre:ne financial hardship to perfcrr, this work
only, and we would request to withdraw our bid proposal .
It is cur understanding that your recommendation to the City
of Atascaderc will be to award to our firm all of the line
itans . Our bid does have the proper funds necessary to
perforn, the work only as combination of line items 1 , 3 , 4 ,
5, 6 , and 7 . It is our understanding that line item 7 is
going to be deleted due to the City of ktascadero not having
the necessary fund_ to perform this wor-. W_ must stress
once again that , in the event the City of Atascadero does
request for our fi_:^ to perform line izer. 6 only, the
fi nal=c:a! hardship that Wil' be experienced by our _`:r.'"ti W4 !
prove to be financially crippling.
We hope the City of 1—ascad=ro understands the d_f_iculties
We experienced at bid time and is receptive to the award of
the 'line items 1, 3 , 4 , 5, and 6 as a whole .
We aooreciate thet1?IIe and cffo-- yohave expanded on this
bid and we recmmtend that a meeting be set up between R.P.
R4chards Construction, the City of Atascadero, and your firm
to discuss the bid in further detain. .
If we can offer any further assistance regarding this
matter, please do not hesitate to call .
Sincerely,
i
Al0�rrt' M.3otreuction
Manager
AMG/mac
cc: R.P . Richards , Inc .
P. Sensibaugh, City of Atascadero
File: Bid File 18
is Isolated Correspondence
s+
R.P. RICHARDS
CONSTRUCTION CO.
A DIVISION OF R.P.RICF'ARDS.INC.
CALIFORNIA LICENSE NO.199946
. i
r......r
.; f
^:aC
y"✓..�.i.._ a.:.�.r � _ _7ii.'w•ter t... ..r _iia. �.� .. .... i� r..—
'10 , V
i • �V I �'V t.i
deleted
^
s .C.•�Cr �1vv
V
F S`1..? r JQv
i 017 . 4 7 .
z_
_. �r _sej t'r.ac rr^. - - - .;..:tia 1 - C. ^C
O-
Ite- 5 City of Ata=ca ^::.t=d =ut that Line
!:i-sblastCS Abatc:`.1: t Of ��v:. _ .;^ L?Sc.. ori: 1��• :1 -•a-
i-ple:::anted. R. P. zcmztructr .. _ -- -_
5949 HOLLISTER AVENUE GOLETA.CALIFORNIA 93117 TELEPHONE:(805)683-1511 FAX:(805)967-5056
r=';1-w to _Lau re.4
item, 5 �� :3rG_ 3tr�Ct_.'_.. c::i.:2=Cc .
QMv_. _ -':
-= -_-"ae.d .. Sc 7t says tha' e '>:C .__ _i::e
- 47n e_
G_ a_. _ ._-__ :...a _tc.. _ .
"...=:.�•3t_�a_ C_ a,r :.tea-ance
»`
CZ a__»..e
Item , Frei C � _ .t -- S:S -:h-:he-- .
h? : _ c-1-s-, _ _vine:
yy
it
T em v
Ite w 9 :Je:,
=ngineer�ng ^-oYcsa_s __ _ :38 2 -
We believe the lntornat_c n t'_ovidec is tc ie r_.'.e and
accurate and, unless s-4P:._eta d in wrlt_:: :geek
of the date of the .:,s=.ing minutes , s'rail to c ,..s'_ie_ ad a
record
If you :ave any furt::e p12_se :: nlot h_s_7atle .0
Cal ;
sincerely, ^
.lbert M. G. at
Ma.ager of or.- C
AMG/:mac
cc: Donald L. Liab, �upt . of Pub= W:rks .
City of Atasraderts
Paul Sensibauch, Director of Public Works
• r
Fred H. Schott & Associates, Inc.
CIVIL&STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING•LAND PLANNING&ARCHITECTURE
November 30, 1988
Mr. Paul Sensibaugh, Public Works Director
City of Atascadero
P. 0. Box 747
Atascadero, CA 93423
Subject: Engineer's Cost Estimate of Phase IIC
Dear Paul:
Per our recent telephone conversation, here is an engineer's cost estimate. We have
based this estimate on an original estimate done by Richard Kopecky of this office in
October 1985. We have used an increase of nine percent based on the construction cost
index found in the publication, ENR.
Mechanical Renovation
(including soffits and HVAC Electrical). . . . . . . . . . $292,100
• Asbestos Removal 13,500
Remote Enclosure (with chain link) 4,000
Architectural Renovation (with third floor restrooms). . . 75,700
Bonds. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,600
Mobilization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,500
Demolition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,000
Construction Cost. . . . . . . . . . . . .(Oct. 1985). $401,400 $401,400
9% Construction Index Increase . . . . . . . .(Nov. 1988). . . . . . . 36,000
10% Contingency. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40,000
20% Contractor's Fee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80,000
Total Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$557,400
If you have any questions or comments please feel free to contact us at your
convenience.
Sincerely,
G
Mark A. Moore
Architect
• MAM:nsb
SAN LUIS OBISPO OFFICE (805)54-12.16 SANTA MARIA OFFICE (805)925-3433
A • Son Lu:s.--tiSCC.�QLiC{1 Q J?.i; i«'obest-o!rrer:..."p.-7u e 17 1 ® Jf1P^Ma
0 i
DRAFT
ADMINISTRATION BUILDING
•ATASCONE: 605 CALIFORNIA
i
0 093422 Cascade
PN
1 INCORPORATED JULY 2. 1079 fMEETIN GE'rNDA _
CITY COUNCIL i L/A ITEM# �
CITY CLERK
CITY TREASURER
i
CITY MANAGER
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
January 17, 1989
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL- DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN - CITY
OF ATASCADERO
Dear Consultants:
You are invited to submit a proposal to the City of Atascadero to
• prepare a Downtown Master Plan.
The City of Atascadero is a community of 23,000 which was master
planned between 1913 and 1917 by a design team put together by
E.G. Lewis . The historic downtown area and civic center were
done in Beaux-Arts style, with the overall City developed
according to the Garden City concept: The Atascadero "residen-
tial district plan" - comprising the central area of this 24
square mile city - qualifies for inclusion in the National
Registry of Historic Places.
The City' s planned downtown area was undermined by lack of subse-
quent planning _ and by the 1954 location of Highway 101
paralleling the City' s main street, E1 Camino Real. This
alignment led to strip development and a decline in the fortunes
of the downtown, which was most recently evidenced by the
departure of a number of businesses which had anchored the area
including Beno' s, Western Office Products, Montgomery Wards
Catalogue Store, and the recent move of the U. S. Post Office to a
larger site outside of the downtown.
The City - which incorporated in 1979 - is committed to revital-
izing the downtown area. A Business Improvement Association has
been established representing the downtown study area (see
attached map) . Undergrounding of overhead utilities is well
under way and should be completed by this spring. In addition, a
• $20,000 Street Tree Program (paid for jointly by the City and the
BIA) has been completed. In March 1988, the firm of Economics
Research Associates completed a two volume study entitled
Economic Base Analysis and Downtown Revitalization: Volume I,
and Volume II Findings and Policy Recommendations. Included in
0 . 0
the study' s recommendations was a proposal to proceed to the next
logical step of preparing a plan for the downtown area to provide
for specific guidance and coordination of public and private
development.
In addition, as part of the City' s General Plan, a plan for the
Atascadero Creekway has been adopted which seeks to capitalize
on this natural feature of the downtown while allowing for
connections between the Century Plaza shopping center to the
southeast and the historic downtown to the northwest. The City
is in the process of designing a vehicular bridge connecting
Lewis Avenue and Santa Ysabel Avenue and a pedestrian bridge
across Atascadero Creek, which aligns with Palma Avenue.
It is envisioned that the Master Plan document would be adopted
by resolution as an element of the City' s General Plan. At this
point a budget of $25,000 has been earmarked. Should your
proposal exceed this amount, it would be useful to indicate what
changes could be made in the scope of work to come in at this
amount.
Your proposal should be submitted to the Community Development
Department no later than 5 :00 p.m. on ,
1989 . If you have any questions about the RFP, please call Henry
Engen, Community Development Director at (805) 466-8000, •
extension 129 .
Sincerely,
Henry Engen
Community Development Director
City of Atascadero
HE:ph
Enclosure: Scope of Work
BIA Boundary Map
SCOPE OF WORK
DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN
City of Atascadero
PURPOSE:
The purpose of this study is to provide a draft element for the
City of Atascadero's General Plan which will guide both private
and public development in a manner which achieves specific down-
town goals and objectives. The plan would be prepared to include
the Atascadero Creekway Plan, which is a vital element of the
study area, and implement the recommendations of the Economic
Research Associates ' Findings and Policy Recommendations (March
1988) .
STUDY OUTLINE:
A. Introduction.
The Introduction would provide a statement of the historical
background of the downtown area and its natural and man-made
characteristics and issues being addressed including:
circulation, parking, land use, image, function, urban
design, school sites, and civic center.
B. Downtown Master Plan.
General goals and policies to enhance the City' s downtown
would be stated, followed by specific goals and policies for
each of the following component categories:
1 . Circulation - graphically portraying and describing
proposed circulation system improvements with emphasis
on both pedestrian and vehicular linkages to connect
the Century Plaza with the historic downtown area, and
to the proposed pathway system along Atascadero Creek.
2 . Parking - utilization of the City' s 1983 parking study
to analyze general parking needs and provide
recommendations for an off-street parking strategy,
off-street parking district, and an in-lieu parking
program through zoning.
0 0
3. Land Use - recommend land use and development standards
for subareas included within the downtown planning
area, e.g. , civic center, Atascadero Creekway, school
lands, historic downtown, shopping centers, highway
commercial, residential, etc.
4 . Urban Design - evaluate and make recommendations on the
urban design elements of the study area, including:
Administration Building, Sunken Gardens, historic
downtown, sections of E1 Camino Real and the Atascadero
Creekway. Important urban design issues include:
theme `_ entranceways, identification, beautification,
appearance review standards, historic buildings,
building height to street width ratios, publicway
treatments, landscaping, trees, street furniture,
public art, landscaped medians, lighting, and signs .
C. Implementation.
Phased program of implementation of both public and private
activities to implement the plan to be developed, including:
downtown image strategy, development review process, capital
improvement program, parking and land use regulations, and
general fiscal sources for financing will be identified to
implement public/private funding requirments .
D. Meetings .
City Staff will coordinate appropriate meetings with the
downtown steering committee and, subsequently, the Planning
Commission and City Council. It is expected that there
would be a minimum of four (4) steering committee meetings
and one (1) meeting to present the final report to the City
Council and Planning Commission.
E . Reports.
Thirty (30) copies of the administrative draft report and
one hundred ( 100) copies of the final report will be
required. The final report will be based on the consultants
professional evaluation of input received in review of the
administrative draft.
F. Principal in Charge/Experience:
Indicate the principal representative from the consulting
firm, together with others assigned to the work. The
consultants experience performing similar work in similar
communities would be an important consideration.
G. Fees.
The proposal should indicate a "lump sum" fee or upset price
for the work cited, together with costs which would be
charged for unforeseen study activities (e.g. , additional
meetings, report copies, etc . ) .
F. Time Schedule.
Indicate the timeline for completion of the work.