Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda Packet 11/22/1988
GEORGIA RAMIREZ DEPUTY CITY CLERK J A G E N D A ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING ATASCADERO ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 6500 PALMA FOURTH FLOOR, ROTUNDA ROOM NOVEMBER 22, 1988 7.30 P.M. RULES OF PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: * Members of the audience may speak on any item on the agenda. * A person may speak for five (5) minutes * No one may speak for a second time until everyone wishing to speak has had an opportunity to do so. * No one may speak more than twice on any item. * Council Members may question any speaker; the speaker may respond, but, after the allotted time has expired, may not • initiate further discussion. * The floor will then be closed to public participation and open for Council discussion. Call to order Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call City Council Comment COMMITTEE REPORTS: (The following represents Ad Hoc or Standing Committees . Informative status reports will be given, as felt necessary. ) 1 City/School Committee 7 . Police Facility 2 . North Coastal Transit Committee 3 . S.L.O. Area Coordinating 8 . Atas . Lake Acquisition Council Committee 4 . Traffic Committee 9 . Business Improvement 5 . Solid/Hazardous Waste Mgmt. Assoc. Committee 10 . Pavilion Committee 6 . Economic Opportunity Commission 11 . Tree Committee COMMUNITY FORUM: The City Council values and encourages exchange change of ideas.. and comments from you, the citizen. The Public Comment Period is provided to receive comments from the public on matters other than scheduled agenda items . To increase the effectiveness of Community Forum, the followingrules will be enforced: _ i i * A maximum of 30 minutes will be allowed for Community Forum, unless Council authorizes an extension. * All remarks shall be addressed to Council, as a whole, and not to any individual member thereof. * No person shall be permitted to make slanderous, profane or personal remarks against any Council Member or staff. * Any person desiring to submit written statements to the Council may do so by forwarding nine ( 9) copies to the City Clerk by 5 :00 p.m. on the Wednesday preceding the Council Meeting. A. CONSENT CALENDAR: All matters listed under Item A, Consent Calendar, are considered to be routine, and will be enacted by one motion in the form listed below. There will be no separate discussion on these items . A member of the Council or public may, by request, have any item removed from the Consent Calendar, which shall then be reviewed and acted upon separately after the adoption of the Consent Calendar. 1 . NOVEMBER 8, 1988 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 2. CITY FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT - OCTOBER, 1988 3. CITY TREASURER' S REPORT - OCTOBER, 1988 4. APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 17-88, 11200 SANTA ANA ROAD Request to subdivide three existing vacant parcels total- ing 17 . 20 ac. into four parcels of 4 .3 ac. each (Kamm & Dohan Partnership/Twin Cities Engineering) 5. APPROVAL OF REQUEST FOR TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 30-85, 905 EL CAMINO REAL (Donald Rochelle, et al) 6. RESOLUTION NO. 108-88 - ESTABLISHMENT OF STOP INTERSECTION ON CABRILLO AVENUE AT ITS INTERSECTION WITH ENSENADA AVENUE B. HEARINGS/APPEARANCES: 1. REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF SOLID WASTE COLLECTION CONTRACT- WIL-MAR DISPOSAL C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: 1. ORDINANCE NO. 185 - ACCEPTING THE STATE PENAL CODE REQUIRE- MENTS RELATING TO THE SELECTION AND TRAINING STANDARDS OF PUBLIC SAFETY DISPATCHERS (First reading, by title only) (Cont'd from 11/8/88) 2 b� 2. PROPOSED ORDINANCE PROHIBITING ABANDONMENT OF WATERFOWL AT ATASCADERO LAKE (Cont' d from 11/8/88) A. Ordinance No. 182 - Amending Title .4 of the Atascadero Municipal Code, entitled Animals, relating to the abandonment of waterfowl at Atascadero Lake (Second & final reading, by title only) 3. PROPOSED ORDINANCE CHANGING TIME OF CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS FROM 7 :30 TO 7 :00 P.M. (Cont' d from 11/8/88) A. Ordinance No. 186 - Amending Title 2 of the Atascadero Municipal Code, entitled "Administration" (First read- ing, by title only) - 4. REGULATIONS RELATING TO SALE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES Request continuance until meeting of December 13, 1988 (Verbal) 5. REGULATIONS RELATING TO ANTI-LOITERING - Request continuance of this item to near future agenda (Verbal) D. NEW BUSINESS: 1. AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT INTERSECTION OF EL CAMINO REAL AND SANTA ROSA ROAD 2. REQUEST FOR LEWIS AVENUE BRIDGE FEE REFUNDS 3. REQUEST BY FRIENDS OF THE LIBRARY REGARDING HOURS OF OPERA- TION OF THE ATASCADERO BRANCH LIBRARY (Verbal) 4. STATUS OF NORTH COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER SITE SELECTION (Verbal) E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION/AND OR ACTION: 1 . City Councilr�jjii 2 . City Attorney 3 . City Clerk ' 4 . City Treasurer 5 . City Manager ** COUNCIL WILL ADJOURN TO A JOINT MEETING WITH THE CITY • PLANNING COMMISSION AT 7 :00 P .M. , TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 29, 1988, IN THE FOURTH FLOOR ROTUNDA ROOM, FOR DISCUSSION REGARDING GENERAL PLAN POLICY SETTING AND REGARDING HIGHWAY 41 . 3 MEETl� Z AGENDA _ DATA- ' 1'fEM, • ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER 8, 19ee The regular meeting of the City Council was called to order at 7:30 p .m. by Mayor Borgeson, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL All Present : Councilmembers Dexter , Lilley, Mackey, Shiers and Mayor Borgeson. Staff Present : Ray Windsor , City Manager; Henry Engen, Community Development Director , Paul Sensibaugh , Public Works Director ; Chief Bud McHale, Police Department ; Jeff Jorgensen, City Attorney; Chief Mike Hicks, Fire Department ; Boyd Sharitz , City Clerk ; Georgia Ramirez , Deputy City Clerk . COUNC I L COMMENT • Mayor Borgeson reminded those in the audience if they haven ' t voted , please do so . COMMITTEE REPORTS SLO AREA COORDINATING COUNCIL - Mayor Borgeson reported that she had been called by the San Luis Area Coordinating Council Secretary and the meeting that was scheduled for December 7th is rescheduled to December 14th . SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE - Councilwoman Mackey said she missed the meeting last week but received a thick book to read on it . The main thing they talked about was recycling . They are hoping that they can get people to recycle 25% of what would normally go to the dump . BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION - Kirk Pearson, BIA President , stated he was there to announce the Third Annual BIA General Meeting on Thursday, November 10th at 7:30 p .m. at the Prather Building . The agenda will include; recap of the underground utility process which is going on right now in the downtown area. Wayne Cooper from PG&E and will bring the members of the BIA up to date as far as the time table for the hookups are concerned . The project is about 60 days ahead of schedule. The trees will • be covered on the agenda --- - final phase of the tree planting that will go along E1 Camino Real . Also to be addressed will be the parking , and Christmas Promotion. Ray Windsor , City Manager , will address the BIA.- He also said that his term as president will be ending soon so he wanted to thank the Council and Staff for giving him the opportunity to serve in this capacity. • COMMUNITY FORM Pete Bunesar from the audience said that he had attended the meeting Cal Trans meeting regarding the 41 realignment . He said there are concerns that affect the residents of that area and may be impacted tremendously but the whole town needs to look at what will happen once that ' s in place. The traffic will be funneled into E1 Camino and Highway 41 intersection. 44It will impact traffic coming off the freeway into Atascadero not only at E1 Camino but at Traffic Way. It will impact people trying to use the Century Federal Savings and Plaza who would like to turn left off of 41 along with those trying to turn left into the Von ' s Shopping Center . 27,000 vehicles use that intersection. What is going to happen when Curbaril is no longer a route for people to go East? 4,500 vehicles per day use that route. He stated he didn ' t believe that it was ever talked about routing 41 north on 101 to 46, east on 46 to where 41 takes off of 46. This would eliminate about 500 vehicles a day on Curbaril , it would minimize the destruction of the rural atmosphere of Atascadero and it would definitely prevent the uprooting of 17 families that are going to have their life styles changed drastically. Mayor Bergeson responded that the City Council and Planning • Commission will have a joint meeting on the 29th of November . At that time one of the items that will be discussed is the circulation element of the General Plan. She urged those concerned to attend that meeting and express their concerns. She also asked that they address their comments to Cal Trans before the deadline of the 10th . A. CONSENT CALENDAR: 1 . October 25, 1988 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 2. OCTOBER 27, 2988 JOINT COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES. 3. APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 18-88, 3100 AND 3150 EL CAMINO REAL (GOLDEN WEST COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP LTD. / VOLBRECHT ) 4. COUNCIL CONFIRMATION OF NEW ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR, MARK JOSEPH. 5. RESOLUTION 106-ee - ACCEPTING NEGOTIATED EXCHANGE OF PROPERTY TAX REVENUE AND ANNUAL TAX INCREMENT FROM THE ATASCADERO COUNTYSANITATIONDIST. TO THE CITY OF ATASCADERO ( Supercedes Res. 99-88, adopted 10/11/ee) -2- 6. DENIAL OF CLAIM BY SALLY ZAMORA ( $50,000) 7. RESOLUTION 107-ee - ACCEPTING THE PENAL CODE REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO THE SELECTION AND TRAINING STANDARDS OF PUBLIC SAFETY DISPATCHERS. City Manager . Ray Windsor , said Item 7 should be removed from the Consent Calendar . It will have to be brought back with the proper documentation to make it an Ordinance instead of a Resolution. Motion: By Councilwoman Mackey, seconded by Councilman Shiers to approve Consent Calendar Items A 1-6. Passed unanimously by roll call vote. B. HEARINGS/APPEARANCES/REPORTS: 1 . PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT CYCLE 1-89 (Review & authorization to refer to Planning Commission for Public Hearing ) Henry Engen, Community Development Director , gave staff report . Glenn Lewis representing the Colombo family stated "historically he didn ' t know why the Colombo property was left out of the Urban Services Line because he understands property south of there was included . The reason for the application by the Colombo family is solely because the last will and testament of their mother bequeathed the 10 acre piece of property among 9 different children and a majority of the children would like to occupy this particular property" . Motion: By Councilman Lilley, seconded by Councilman Dexter , to direct staff to prepare an analysis and bring to public hearing the General Plan Amendment study areas recommended by the Planning Commission. Passed unanimously. 2. SEWER EXTENSION REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT (MACCORKLE) Staff report was given by Paul Sensibaugh , Public Works Director . There was no public comment . . Motion: By Councilwoman-Mackey, seconded by Councilman Shiers to approve the attached Sewer Extension Reimbursement Agreement between the City and Mr . and Mrs. MacCorkle. Motion passed unanimously by roll call vote. -3- 3. REQUEST BY ACTION FOR ANIMALS ' RIGHTS (AFAR.) REGARDING SPAY/ NEUTER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM. Ray Windsor , City Manager , gave staff report . Daphne Fahsing , President of AFAR, said this would be an expansion of the program. It would not restrict any of the certificates at all , but is intended to get some of the stray cats taken care of. Council comments followed . Council concurred with using some of the $12,000 in a pilot program to spay and neuter the stray and wild cats. C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: 1 . CONVERSION OF x.50 DEVELOPMENT MITIGATION TAX TO A FEE AND EXPANDING THE BOUNDARY FOR THE LEWIS AVE. BRIDGE FEE (Cont ' d from 10/11/88 and 10/25/88) A. Resolution No . 100-88 - Establishing a development fee for all developments within the incorporated area of the City of Atascadero pursuant to Urgency Ord . 183. B. Urgency Ord . No . 183 - An Urgency Ordinance of the City Council superseding Chapter 8 of Title 3 of the City ' s Municipal Code relating to development impact fees and repealing Ordinances 111 , 118 and 119. Paul Sensibaugh presented the staff report noting that the City Attorney advised that Ordinance No . 103 cannot be acted on in its present form; therefore only Resolution 100-88 (as amended today) is ready for action. Motion: By Councilman Dexter , seconded by Councilwoman Mackey to approve Resolution No . 100-88. Passed unanimously by roll call vote. 2. PROPOSED ORDINANCE PROHIBITING ABANDONMENT OF WATERFOWL AT ATASCADERO LAKE (Requested by Council 9/ 13/88) A. Ordinance No . 1S2 - Amending Title 4 of the Atascadero Municipal Code, entitled Animals, relating to the abandonment of waterfowl at Atascadero Lake (First reading ) Staff report was gi-ven by Ray Windsor , City Manager . Council comments followed . -4- • • Daphne Fahsin.g , Prp5ident of AFAR, asked how are you going to stop the people from dropping off the ducks? Is there much use in having an ordinance that you can ' t enforce? What would be the penalty? Mayor Borgeson said she hoped with this Ordinance it will have some impact on those dropping off fowl at the Lake . Jeffrey Jorgensen, City Attorney, stated it would be an infraction and probably would be a $50 fine. Motion: Made by Councilman Dexter , seconded by Councilwoman Mackey, to wave reading of the Ordinance in full , a read by title only. Passed unanimously by roll call vote. 3. AWARD CONTRACT FOR CLASSIFICATION AND SALARY STUDY Staff report was given by Ray Windsor , City Manager . Motion: Made by Councilman Lilley, seconded by Councilman Shiers to approve the awarding of the bid of $6,800 to Comp Plus for the Classification and Salary Study. Passed unanimously by roll call vote. D. NEW BUSINESS 1 . RESOLUTION NO. 105-88 - AUTHORIZATION FOR CITY TO ENTER INTO MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT (MOA) RELATIVE TO MEASURES TO MITIGATE THE IMPACT OF HIGHWAY 41 EXTENSION ON HISTORICAL RESOURCES. Ray Windsor , City Manager , gave the staff report . Motion: By Mayor Borgeson, seconded by Councilwoman Mackey to postpone item until the joint meeting on the 29th of November . Passed unanimously . 2. ATASCADF_RO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT RESOLUTION 9 - ANTI LOITERING MEASURES IN CITY OF ATASCADERO. Ray Windsor , City Manager , asked Council, not to act on this item tonight so that staff, City Attorney and he can give input in writing to council so that council could digest the information before they act on this item. • There was no public comments. -5- Motion: By Councilwoman Mackey, seconded by Councilman Lilley, to refer to staff to bring back a report to Council . Passed unanimously. 3. ESTABLISHMENT OF A LOCAL UMMET TRANSIT NEEDS HEARING City Manager , Ray Windsor , gave the staff report . Council comments followed . Consensus of Council was that a public hearing should be held preferably early enough so that people using Dial A Ride could attend the meeting . This will be discussed further at meeting of November 9th . 4. ESTABLISHMENT OF COUNCIL SUB-COMMITTEES Ray Windsor , City Manager , gave staff report . Council discussion followed . Mayor- Borgeson stated that Councilmen Shiers and Lilley had agreed to serve on the sub-committee for fiscal matters . For Tree Preservation Councilmen Dexter and Shiers agreed to serve on the sub-committee. Land-Use (General Plan Update) - Mayor Borgeson that at the Planning Commission Level she recommended George Luria . City Manager Ray Windsor stated that the Planning Commission should discuss it and for the Chairman to appoint or concur with this appointment . Marge Mackey and Mayor Borgeson will serve on this sub-committee. E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION 1 . City Council Councilwoman Mackey said she had received a phone call regarding the tree management section of the tree ordinance. Mayor Borgeson said they had looked at steps in the body of the ordinance and then there was going to be street planting , and then the tree management plan. Councilman Lilley stated he would like to submit for consideration of the council the creation of a committee to explore the possible feasibility of the outdoor amphitheater in Atascadero . • -6- Ray Windsor , City Manager , suggested that council may want to defer- the appointment of such a sub committee until the next meeting in order that staff know exactly what council ' s priorities are. This will be discussed more on 11/9/88. 2. City Clerk Boyd Sharitz , introduced Georgia Ramirez , Deputy City Clerk . 3. City Manager A. Request to change regular Council Meeting Time to 7:00 p .m. Ray Windsor will have the City Attorney work up the modification to the Ordinance. Consensus of the Council was to direct the City Manager to follow up . B. League of CA Cities City Council /City Manager Leader- ship Team Workshop , January le-20, 1989 . Ray Windsor , asked that as many Council Members as possible attend this meeting . C. Reschedule joint Council /Planning Commission Meeting of 11 / 17/88 to 11/29/88, 7:00 p .m. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 9:00 P.M. TO A CLOSED SESSION FOR DISCUSSION REGARDING LITIGATION AND PERSONNEL MATTERS. CLOSED SESSION ADJOURNED AT 10:20 P.M. TO 5:00 P.M. WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 9, 19ee, FOR A STUDY SESSION REGARDING 5-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS AND COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SETTING. MINUTES RECORDED BY: BOYD C . SHARITZ, CITY CLERK PREPARED BY: GEORGIA RAMIREZ, DEPUTY CITY CLERK • MEETI ,, �,�AGENDA DATe TEM N .. • CITY OF ATASCADERO SCHEDULE OF CASH RECEIPTS AND TRANSFERS IN FOR THE MONTH OF OCTOBER, 1988 CASH RECEIPTS: Taxes : Property Tax 20 ,599. 55 Sales Tax 98,700.00 Motor Vehicle In-Lieu 75,439. 03 Cigarette Tax 3,971. 39 Development Impact Tax 23,177.50 Miscellaneous Taxes 77. 70 Occupancy Tax 14,647. 83 Other Receipts : School Resource Officer 7,837. 97 Licenses/Permits/Fees 50 ,979. 07 Franchise Fee 4 ,050. 33 P.O.S.T. Reimbursement 3,858. 43 Fines/Penalties/Overages 1,016. 69 Gas Tax 26 ,918.25 Traffic Safety 7,968. 43 Zoo Reserve Fund 279.00 Parks and Recreation Fees 14 ,032.10 • Investment Earnings 57,946. 73 Weed Abatement 280.69 Street Assessments 1,302. 60 Local Transportation 93,422. 20 Development Fees 35,193. 88 Zoo Receipts 2 ,947. 33 Rents/Concessions 500. 00 Sales-Maps/Publications/Reports 464. 40 Special Police Services 171. 00 Miscellaneous 747.58 TOTAL CASH RECEIPTS 546 ,529.68 FUND TRANSFERS IN: Sanitation Fund Reimbursement 51,115. 04 TOTAL FUND TRANSFERS IN 51,115. 04 OTHER CASH RECEIPTS: Bail 305. 00 Reimbursement to Expense 3,999. 94 Refundable Bonds 1,800.00 Refunds 2 ,345.00 TOTAL OTHER CASH RECEIPTS 8,449. 94 • CITY OF ATASCADERO • CASH ACTIVITY SUMMARY FOR THE MONTH OF OCTOBER, 1988 BEGINNING CASH RESOURCES 2 ,981,105. 44 ADD: RECEIPTS 554 ,979. 62 FUND TRANSFERS 51,115. 04 INVESTMENTS REDEEDIED 379 ,000. 00 LESS : DISBURSEMENTS 668 ,079.25 FUND TRANSFERS 379,000. 00 ENDING CASH RESOURCES 2 ,919 ,120. 85 SCHEDULE OF CASH RESOURCES Int. Due AS OF OCTOBER 31, 1988 Rate Date Checking Account: Mid-State Bank 70 ,580. 85 Certificates of Deposit: Butterfield Savings 99 ,000.00 8. 00 12/06/88 First Cal Savings 99 ,000.00 8. 00 11/15/88 • Other Investments : Local Agency Inv. Fund 2,650 ,000. 00 8. 40 N/A Other Cash Resources : Petty Cash 540.00 TOTAL CASH RESOURCES 2 ,919 ,120. 85 i GERE SIBBACH City Treasurer • • � MEETI GENDAMATE �LZ/ TEM! . „� CITY OF ATASCADERO • SCHEDULE OF DISBURSEMENTS FOR THE MONTH OF OCTOBER, 1988 DISBURSEMENTS Hand Warrant Register for October, 1988 3 ,861.16 10/07/88 Accounts Payable Warrants 274 ,179. 57 10/12/88 Accounts Payable Warrants 103 ,410. 56 10/21/88 Accounts Payable Warrants 26 ,033. 93 10/28/88 Accounts Payable Warrants 65,421. 30 Service Charge-Mastercard/Visa 5.24 10/31/88 Wire Transfers 250 ,000. 00 10/12/88 Payroll Checks #43999-44146 101,121. 99 10/26/88 Payroll Checks #44147-44276 98,361.46 Total 922 ,395.21 LESS: - Prior Month Adjustment 3,969. 04 Voided Check #43054 34. 80 Voided Check #43340 110. 50 Voided Check #43323 201.62 Total Disbursements : 918,079. 25 • I, RAY WINDSOR, do hereby certify and declare that demands enumerated and referred to in the foregoing register are accurate and just claims against the City and that there are funds avail- able for payment thereof in the City Treasury. The breakdown detail on all accounts is available for your viewing in the Finance office. V Yay VVKJbSOR City Manager • M E M O R A N D U M TO: City Council November 22, 1988 VIA: Ray Windsor, City Manager FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 17-88 LOCATION: 11200 Santa Ana Road APPLICANT: Kamm & Dohan Partnership (Twin Cities Engineering) REQUEST: To subdivide three existing vacant parcels totaling 17 . 20 acres into four parcels containing 4 .3 acres each. • BACKGROUND: On November 1, 1988, the Atascadero Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the above-referenced subject. On a 5 : 2 vote (with Commissioners Luna and Brasher dissenting) , the land divi- sion request was approved subject to the revised conditions of approval ( specifically, deletion of condition #11) . There was considerable discussion on this matter as reflected in the attached minutes excerpt. RECOMMENDATION: Approval of Tentative Parcel Map 17-88 per the Planning Commis- sion' s recommendation. HE :ps cc : Kamm & Dohan, A General Parnership Twin Cities Engineering Attachments : Staff Report - "November 1, 1988 Minutes Excerpt - November 1 , 1988 Revised Conditions of Approval - November 1, 1988 • CITY OF ATASCADERO Item: B-1 STAFF REPORT • FOR: Planning Commission Meeting Date: Nov. 1, 1988 BY: Joel Moses, Associate Planne File No: TM 17-88 SUBJECT: Tentative Parcel Map 17-88 to subdivide 3 (three) existing vacant parcels totaling 17. 20 acres into 4 (four) parcels containing 4.3 acres each. A. SITUATION AND FACTS: 1. Applicant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Kamm & Dohan a partnership 2. Representative. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Twin Cities Engineering 3. Project Address. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11200 Santa Ana Road 4. Legal Description. . . . . . . . . . . .Par. 1 & 2 of PM 40-91, & Par. 10 of PM 39-87 5. Site Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17. 20 acres • 6. Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .RS (Residential Suburban) 7. General Plan Designation. . . . .Suburban Single Family 8. Existing Use. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Two single family residences and a vacant parcel 9. Environmental Status. . . . . . . . .Negative Declaration posted October 19, 1988 B. ANALYSIS: The applicant proposes to subdivide 3 (three) existing parcels containing 17. 20 acres into 4 (four) parcels containing 4. 3 acres each. Two of the existing parcels having frontage on Cebada Road are developed with single family residences. The third parcel " is undeveloped. Proposed Parcels 1 & 2 will have direct access to Cebada Road. Parcels 3 & 4 will have direct access to Santa Ana. Overall the proposal is for the creation of one new lot. The subject property is located in the RS (Residential Suburban) zone. Minimum lot size in this zone ranges between 2. 5 and 10 1 • II I • • acres depending on the "score" of the various performance • standards. For this site, the minimum lot size criteria are: Distance from Center (10, 000-12, 000) . . . . . . . . . . . . 0. 30 Septic Suitability (Moderate) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0. 75 Average Slope (31-35%) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1. 75 Access Condition (City Accepted) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0. 40 General Neighborhood Character (5.50ac. ) . . . . . . . . 1. 10 Minimum Lot Size. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.30 acres The proposed lot sizes of 4. 30 acres are equal to the minimum lot size required for the site. The site includes a ridge line along Santa Ana Road and a creek bottom along the Cebada Road frontage. The intervening slope, which exceeds 20%, is partially covered with native oak trees. Two residences have been constructed along Cebada Road. Two building sites are proposed along Santa Ana Road. One existing site can currently be used, the second to the south would be the new site. The creation of the new parcel would provide a building site within 75'-0" of Santa Ana Road, and within 150' -0" of the existing site to the north. Construction will extend a row of home sites along the highly visible ridge line. The selected sites will not require the removal of any native trees. Peculation tests have been provided showing that all proposed sites have adequate areas for septic systems. The new site' s tests are relatively high but a system can be designed for the site. Comments were received from several outside agencies. Our Fire Department noted no problems with the proposed map. The Building Division noted some concern with the potential septic systems on the site but noted that the concerns could be overcome through the design process. The Southern California Gas Company has noted that the site can be served by existing 3 inch mains in Cebada and San Pedro Roads. The Public Works Department has noted the need for offers of dedication and drainage improvements along Cebada Road C. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends conditional approval of Tentative Parcel Map 17- 88 based on the Findings in Exhibit C and Conditions of Approval in Exhibit D. 2 ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A - Location Map Exhibit B - Tentative Map Exhibit C - Map Detail Exhibit D - Findings for Approval Exhibit E - Conditions of Approval JM/jm 3 CITY OF ATASCADERO EXHIBIT A - LOCATION I\1AP TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP I7-88 ���o' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 11200 SANTA ANA ROAD • \,� DEPARTMENT _ KAMM/DOHAN/TWIN CITIES ENG. - . / J z -- a W � G a • _ s RS - P� 0 ' / C BALeo JA L C, r, R S 1 \N SITE: 11200 SANTA ANAti TPM 17-88 ',o RS 0 %0, 0 11040 \ �g►Nt' // G�/ I '10- RO,p - RS ( 1 R S � y 1✓ i O �/ \\\ ,NT OAD a 01 CI � �♦ SII Otis vp 1 �� -- ao►.° i . EXHIBIT B - TENTATIVE MAP .. . `1 CITY OF ATASCADERO TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 17-88 1979-7 11200 SANTA ANA ROAD `sscanf COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT KAMM/DOHAN/TWIN CITIES ENG. DEPARTMENT c q' _-; •i'�7T�,T_� i - �1'�L:��f``-sS�JGcfloN May) - '' ^A`K�•1%14'•P rOP re.i1MF i,aMnl,,�trslery, (!liMPH� - .+6N ,p'y tPit.. W.Vf72.S CER71FIG17E co O SS UW(A'G6[. }YZV),AQlp.4yC,LL MG _, - y POGK,tp ANC yLAp(.j M4�'+i Mgos cei-+a;n+:.7 A I wE4 vu[s7 w.••.�w.d<7N6 d..ssv '.{ 11,11Z.1--p C% 0r lro �N7r�sip�i•.r<MJ - Z t-�IA C1 lI�LI(bWJln kL,LL /�d,7117 !Ga NMQ un.{ LOT 7D t 1 , �•3'LN r I ' • 1 t1LV2�� - � I� 1939 _ .. L —. ea'1 lf6Til ` ` Ary ` ryPL.'1—•^'� 1 ,. ;, ', \ :fl+ � r-'`'(_ ��r•v. ' : Ir'Ppo„ry M'v�...�,�er4ra►�o 1u.epHa+r,ueu-. .I 7: °ri fol rh `•�.. ,eDar. t . )'- -•• s .\kc�•+[>trN4`" N. �' � 11147 � �ViUNrF(_"T NS�a> - � lOY 17 Izyt r iii ''-4.sic a_r E Erw.e.. :.�",' '- 2e \��7si1>nsK,\ I - � �"P/L4C��.7.•- - _ ' -•r.,l✓�-'Itcee 'E��. "nu n�wT.uwer _ «/N/H - .� � 4 .�,� � �. r,�a + 1 �""• "r �„e..'' ', - _-.'.� t 4,3A -114 •A_ /��/-�y ./��>>rr \� \ NNl]e l'W 3,1.11 _ .•. ^L. Ilio .(Q,p, )7� .• _ ; , �\..S. /�"jj,! ,LIP •� '✓'IRCL>L.MhO��I CIV.[J-l�•S• . I � � �/.' \ ./�I�i�,/1L,� ; '6(n/4 A bvaWl O/M.ei•.f.�y2>n.�elt . •� ..! -C3.LG 31lF .(,-, �v7 IMS b PM/a/ww Wr/e M MccWw/ \v ', 1..�`�•( t'A' \� ~� :t�ltw ..y�xW a¢ vwvrv�w.s'ir.�s •�io c4 nsu�sPo /1c7G�TitE.LJTIS[[%vf.GEG WTA •. n _ CI)K 7FEz.5 rF IWcyi�w LU7,a?s� .I in(ib.20 TWIN CmEs ENGINEERING•ANG. WI07713. k -.' /U7' /� F&Ao. Zw> m Czr,su,m O/N7 eo.777 . - • I • -7C[✓-MV•G,(,PPRwW. 7SNS(ePf)Nt'N)t � � • EXHIBIT C - MAP DETAIL ... . ` CITY OF ATASCADERO TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 17-88 1979-7COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 11200 SANTA ANA ROAD A �ERo' KAMM/DOHAN/TWIN CITIES ENG. DEPARTMENT - .i•_.. R:20Z•f0 -. �o . •N l5�� 'i� o�_r[n Zcn 47c+o' 4�Z3'— �•. f �J Gr2tFr+nc. 5G1t6!N FEeT 47 t r` �.r �_ �-_�. \.-'- 37./ „E '/2� -�l39�, t r W 11 R�9�•7�! �+ aG"0641 • � � �� L f7�7j1V�.,r. 'tom. .- . • -.� - ��1�'. . s- ` `: � �1` .. � -`..tom' � .�•. -_''� y� 1V�Ttr�xa 5-0 ? iT,11n1E n i22p'� �_.� \ • \ �; �XIst11�Cp 'V6ES j� fir " 1 tr r 2 :r . Zoo zap /Z W�CO.39' 'r{ _ Vzz° A Q.YS7 0 K�55L b �4_ r+,lie 170.45 /r'�Y. r '23 • 0 EXHIBIT D - Findings for Approval Tentative Parcel Map 17-88 (AT 88-134) . 11200 Santa Ana Road Kamm/Dohan/Twin Cities Engineering November 1, 1988 FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL 1. Creation of the proposed parcels conforms to the Zoning Ordinance and the General Plan land use designation, densities and other policies. 2. Creation of these parcels, in conformance with the recommended Conditions of Approval, will not have a significant adverse effect upon the environment. The Negative Declaration prepared for the project is adequate. 3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. 4. The site is physically suitable for the density of the development proposed. 5. The design of the subdivision, and the proposed improvements, will not cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish and wildlife or their habitat 6. The design of the subdivision, and the type of the improvements, will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or the use of property within the proposed subdivision; or substantially equivalent alternate easements are provided. 7. The proposed subdivision complies with Section 66474. 6 of the State Subdivision Map Act as to the methods of handling and discharge of waste. JM/jm EXHIBIT - Conditions of Approval • Tentative Parcel Map 17-88 (AT 88-134) 11200 Santa Ana Road Kamm/Dohan/Twin Cities November 1, 1988 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. Water shall be obtained from the Atascadero Mutual Water Company. Water lines shall be extended to the frontage of each parcel or its public utilities easement prior to the recording of the final map. 2. All existing and proposed utility, pipeline, open space, or other easements are to be shown on the final map. If there are building or other restrictions related to the easements, they shall be noted on the final map. 3. All relocation and/or alteration of existing utilities shall be the responsibility of the developer. 4. Grading, and Drainage plans for all accessways, prepared by a registered Civil Engineer, shall be submitted to the Community Development Department for review and approval by the Community Development and Public Works Departments prior to the recording of the final map. 5. The Subdivider shall provide drainage easements over the existing swale through parcels 1 & 2 as approved by the Public Works Department. 6. All lot grading and drainage improvements shall require written certification by a registered Civil Engineer that all work has been completed and is in full compliance with the approved plans prior to the final building inspection. 7. All grading and erosion control measures shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and constructed in accordance with the City of Atascadero grading codes and standards. Prior to the final building inspection, said engineer shall submit to the City written certification that grading is in conformance with said codes and standards. 8. Offers of dedication to the City of Atascadero for the following rights-of-way and/or easements are required: Street Name: Cebada Road Limits : 20 ' -0" from center line of Right-of-Way along entire parcel frontage 9. Offers of dedication shall be completed and recorded prior to or simultaneous with the recordation of the final map. 0 9 10. Improvements shall be made to Cebada Road along the property frontage to correct existing drainage problem. Work shall include the following: a. Grading the shoulder to drain and constructing a paved swale to convey water to the natural drainage course. b. The pipe under the driveway leading to Parcel 2 shall be sized by a registered Civil Engineer, and upgraded if necessary to convey the storm drainage to the swale. 11. A senic easement shall be provided from the center line of the creek to within 200 '-0" of Santa Ana Road. 12. A final map in substantial conformance with the approved tentative map and in compliance with all conditions set forth herein shall be submitted for review and approval in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City' s Subdivision Ordinance prior to the recording of the final map. a. Monuments shall be set at all new property corners by a Registered Civil Engineer or Licensed Land Surveyor as required by the Land Surveyors Act and Subdivision Map Act. b. A recently updated preliminary title report shall be submitted for review in conjunction with the processing of the final map. C. A preliminary subdivision guarantee shall be submitted for review in conjunction with the processing of the final map. 13. Approval of this tentative map shall expire two years from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted pursuant to a written request prior to the expiration date. JM/jm i MINUTES - ATASCADERO PLANNING COMMISSION Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 1 , 1988 7 :30 p.m. Atascadero Administration Building e regular meeting of the Atascadero Planning Commis ion was ca ed to order at 7 :30 p.m. by Chairperson Lochridge f lowed by the edge of Allegiance. ROLL CAL Present: Co issioners Highland, Luna, Tobey, aage, Brasher, Lope -Balbontin (arrived 7 :33 p.m. , and Chairperson Lochri e Absent: None Staff Present: Henry E en, Commun ' y Development Director; Joel Mose Assoc ' to Planner; Pat Shepphard, Administrat e S cretary I A. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 . Approval of mutes of the regular Planning Commission meeting of tober 18, 1988 2 . Approva of time extension for T tative Parcel Map 30- 85 at 05 E1 Camino Real (Rochelle, et al) Commiss ' ner Luna requested that the minut be pulled from the C sent Calendar for discussion (to be ken up after "He ings" section of the agenda) . TION: Made by Commissioner Tobey, seconded b Commis- sioner Luna and carried 7 : 0 to approve Ite A-2 of the Consent Calendar. B. HEARINGS, APPEARANCES AND REPORTS 1. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 17-88 : Request initiated by Kamm and Dohan Partnership (Twin Cities Engineering) to allow subdivisio of three exist- ing parcels totaling 17 . 20 acres into four parcels con- taining 4 .3 acres each. Subject site is located at 11200 Santa Ana Road. • Joel Moses presented the staff report on this lot division request. Two of the proposed parcels will have direct access to Cebada Road while the other two will have direct access to Santa Ana. Staff is recommending approval subject to certain conditions . -1- • • MINUTES EXCERPT - PLANNING COMMISSION - NOVEMBER 1 , 1988 0 Commissioner Brasher inquired as to how staff determined the minimum lot size. She explained that she took measurements of the property with regard to the distance from the center (of town) and came up with 12, 500 which would change the factor from 0 .30 to 0 .40. Mr. Moses noted the minimum lot size calculations were also determined from a previous parcel map just south of this site. He referenced a map which reflects a concentric circle basis and explained how determining a site' s distance from the center of town is achieved. Commissioner Luna concurred with Commissioner Brasher' s statements adding that he also measured the distance and came up with a performance factor of 0 .40 . He did not see how this particular subdivision meets the minimum lot criteria and, therefore, did not feel this matter should be considered at this time. In response to question from Commissioner Brasher, Mr. Moses explained the three methods utilized in determining the slope of a property. Discussion followed relative to the previous lot split in- volving a portion of land which is being considered for this particular map and what affect the minimum lot size calcula- tions for the earlier map now has on the subject lot split. Also discussed was the "bulls-eye" map and the difficulty in determining its accuracy with regard to the distance from center factor. Tom Vaughan with Twin Cities Engineering, representing the applicant, noted that his firm has utilized the minimum lot size map has been a standard for over four years . He ex- plained that two' of the proposed four parcels are already developed and that this map also involves a lot line adjust- ment to alleviate certain encroachments . He pointed out that Cebada Road is not an original Colony road. Cebada Road was offered and accepted by an earlier lot line adjust- ment. Mr. Vaughan indicated that he had reviewed proposed conditions of approval with Paul Sensibaugh that afternoon and that he had concurred in some changes . Mr. Vaughan asked that condition ##11 (scenic easement) be deleted noting where the proposed home sites will be located. He expressed opposition to ##5 (drainage easements) as this requirement appears to be redundant (noting the previous subdivisions) . With regard to #10 (road improve-ments along Cebada Road) , it was pointed out that this requirement should have been taken care of through the prev-ious lot line adjustment. In response to questions from the Commission, Mr. Vaughan explained the background involved with the previous lot -2- • i MINUTES EXCERPT - PLANNING COMMISSION - NOVEMBER 1 , 1988 split involving a portion of the subject property, and spoke on utilization of the "bulls-eye" map and procedures his firm uses in calculating the minimum lot sizes. William Dohan, applicant, explained the background involved with the purchase of this property noting he contacted staff concerning the feasibility of being able to split said property. Based on representations by the City, he proceeded with the property purchase and subsequent lot split request. Mr. Dohan added that it is not fair to deny this request based on the invalidity of the "bulls-eye" map as this map meets the minimum lot size standards and other applicable City codes and regulations. The lot split corrects other problems previously created; no tree removal will be necessary. He explained his reasons for objecting to condition #10 but added that he would be willing to comply with #5 . He then responded to questions from the Commission relative to ridge top development in relation to the scenic easement, etc. In response to question from the Commission, Mr. Engen stated that input from Public Works is needed before any recommendations on deletion of Conditions #5 and #10 could - be made and a continuance would be in order. Mr. Vaughan asked that in lieu of a continuance, that the map be approved with the conditions as presented. Dorothy McNeil asked if prospective buyers of property are made guarantees that property they buy would be assured of lot splits. Mr. Moses responded. Commissioner Waage disagreed with the "target" map but did not feel that the applicant should be penalized because of this . He also indicated he would not have a problem with deleting condition #11 (scenic easement requirement) . Commissioner Luna stated his primary objection is that the creation of the proposed parcel does not conform to the Zon- ing Ordinance and the minimum lot size is 4 . 4 (rather than 4 .3 ) , therefore, he would not be able to approve this request. Commissioner Highland noted he is uncomfortable with condi- tion #10 as a question has been raised as to whether this condition was part of a lot split that was not met. This should have been determined before the condition was placed on this map. He agreed with Commissioner Waage that in this case, there is no practical use for a scenic easement. He added that prospective buyers of property are influenced by minimum lot sizes that can be created, but that those who do wish to split to the minimum should not be prevented to do SO. He pointed out that the difference between 4 .4 acres and 4 . 3 acres is less than 2 1/20. �3.. • • MINUTES EXCERPT - PLANNING COMMISSION - NOVEMBER 1, 1988 Mr. Engen explained the historical prospective with the "target" map and commented on a previous zoning ordinance provision which provided for up to a 20% adjustment in minimum lot size. Discussion followed. Chairperson Lochridge stated he did not view this or any other lot split as a growth issue and added some additional comments relative to minimum lot sizes . MOTION: Made by Commissioner Tobey and seconded by Commis- sioner Highland to approve Tentative Parcel Map 17-88 subject to the findings and conditions with deletion of conditions #5, #10, and #11 . Commissioner Waage felt there should be input by Public Works before deletion of conditions #5 and #10 . Commissioner Tobey amended the motion to eliminate condition #11 only. Commissioner Highland seconded the amendment. The motion carried 5 : 2 with Commissioners Luna and Brasher dissenting. Commissioner Tobey requested that a member from the Public Works Department be present at each Planning Commission meeting to be be available for any questions relative to public works matters . Chairperson Lochridge asked staff to apprise the Commission of procedures applicants go through for applications in an effort to alleviate any dilemmas in the future. Item A-1 - Approval of minutes of the regu r Planning ission meeting of October 18, 1988 Commis 'oner Luna suggested the followin amendment to the minutes : age 2, 2nd paragraph - He no ed it was the Subdi- vision Ord' nce referenced to rathe than the General Plan. MOTION: Made b Commissioner Highland, seconded by Commis- sioner Lu and ca ied 7 : 0 to approve Item A-1 as amended ove. PUBLIC COMMENT: There was no pub c comment at thi time. C. INDIVIDUAL MMENT 1. P nning Commission i Th a was considerable discussion concerning t Commis- ion' s displeasure with the "bulls-eye" map. It w noted -4- EXHIBIT D - Conditions of Approval Tentative Parcel Map 17-88 (AT 88-134) 11200 Santa Ana Road Kamm/Dohan/Twin Cities November 1, 1988 (Revised by Commission) CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. Water shall be obtained from the Atascadero Mutual Water Company. Water lines shall be extended to the frontage of each parcel or its public utilities easement prior to the recording of the final map. 2. All existing and proposed utility, pipeline, open space, or other easements are to be shown on the final map. If there are building or other restrictions related to the easements, they shall be noted on the final map. 3. All relocation and/or alteration of existing utilities shall be the responsibility of the developer. 4. Grading, and Drainage plans for all accessways, prepared by a registered Civil Engineer, shall be submitted to the Community Development Department for review and approval by the Community Development and Public Works Departments prior to the recording of the final map. 5. The Subdivider shall provide drainage easements over the existing swale through parcels 1 & 2 as approved by the Public Works Department. 6. All lot grading and drainage improvements shall require written certification by a registered Civil Engineer that all work has been completed and is in full compliance with the approved plans prior to the final building inspection. 7. All grading and erosion control measures shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and constructed in accordance with the City of Atascadero grading codes and standards. Prior to the final building inspection, said engineer shall submit to the City written certification that grading is in conformance with said codes and standards. 8. Offers of dedication to the City of Atascadero for the following rights-of-way and/or easements are required: Street Name: Cebada Road Limits: 20 '-0" from center line of Right-of-Way along entire parcel frontage 9. Offers of dedication shall be completed and recorded prior to or simultaneous with the recordation of the final map. 10. Improvements shall be made to Cebada Road along the property frontage to correct existing drainage problem. Work shall include the following: a. Grading the shoulder to drain and constructing a paved Swale to convey water to the natural drainage course. b. The pipe under the driveway leading to Parcel 2 shall be sized by a registered Civil Engineer, and upgraded if necessary to convey the storm drainage to the swale. 11. A final map in substantial conformance with the approved tentative map and in compliance with all conditions set forth herein shall be submitted for review and approval in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City's Subdivision Ordinance prior to the recording of the final map. a. Monuments shall be set at all new property corners by a Registered Civil Engineer or Licensed Land Surveyor as required by the Land Surveyors Act and Subdivision Map Act. b. A recently updated preliminary title report shall be submitted for review in conjunction with the processing of the final map. c. A preliminary subdivision guarantee shall be submitted for review in conjunction with the processing of the final map. 12. Approval of this tentative map shall expire two years from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted pursuant to a written request prior to the expiration date. JM/jm MEM4Zn_=r • IDA M E M O R A N D U M TO: City Council November 22, 1988 VIA: Ray Windsor, City Manager FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director IS& SUBJECT: Time Extension for Tentative Parcel Map 30-85 LOCATION: 905 E1 Camino Real APPLICANT: Donald Rochelle, et al • BACKGROUND: On November 1, 1988, the Planning Commission considered this item on its consent calendar, unanimously approving the time extension. There was no discussion nor public testimony given. RECOMMENDATION: Approval of a time extension for Tentative Parcel Map 30-85 to January 26 , 1990 . HE :ps cc : Donald Rochelle Zelda Webb James Haun Atascadero Ltd. David L. Ray Attachment: Staff Report dated November 1 , 1988 • Item: A-2 Meeting Date : 11/1/88 M E M O R A N D U M • DATE : November 1, 1988 TO : Planning Commission FROM : Joel Moses, Associate Planner SUBJECT : Time Extension - Tentative Parcel Map 30-85 905 E1 Camino Real The applicant is requesting a one year time extension for the previously approved map. The four parcel map was approved in 1987 implementing an approved zone change. This will be the first and only time extension for the map. The property has been previously involved in an incomplete General Plan and Zone Change application to create a site for a movie studio. The application was never completed so the mater never came to public hearing. The map is now being processed by a court appointed receiver. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the approval of a one year time extension of Parcel Map 30-85 • Attachments Exhibit A - Developers Letter Exhibit. B - Prior Staff Report xhibit A I Developer' s Statement RECEIVER 10960 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD,.TENTH FLOOR LOS ANGELES.CALIFORNIA 90024 (213) 473-8405 (213) 879-8733 REFERENCE NO. September 29 , 1988 5288.001 Henry Engen Planning Director City of Atascadero P. O. Box 747 Atasacadero, CA 93423 Re: "Rochelle Property" Tenative Parcel Map No. 30-85, AT-85-319 (initiated by Atascadero Ltd. /Don Rochelle/ Zelda Webb/Bethel & Associates Dear Mr. Engen: Please be advised that David L. Ray has been appointed Receiver by the San Louis Obispo County Superior Court in the civil action entitled, Rochelle v. Atascadero Ltd. , et al. , Civil Action No. 57791. As Receiver, David L. Ray is charged with selling the property. Enclosed please find a photocopy of the Court' s recent order. The Receiver and the litiaants have been represented in Atasacadero by James Haun of Ha-un Realty. He has informed me that he met with you on or about August 11 regarding the expiration date of the tentative map covering the Rochelle property. According to information provided to him at the time, the expiration date is scheduled for January 26, 1989 . You stated to him that the expiration date can be extended for one year if a request is made in writing. Please consider this letter a formal request for an extension of the tenative map on the above-described property. t RP:5288.001.ORD1 1 DAVID L. RAY r' State Court Receiver 2 10960 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 1000 3 Los Angeles, California 90024 --1 +��'`. -� ti" 1;. (213) 473-8405 - 879-8733 ,. t,:r \�, t'L�• V''fin�-�� 4 6 7 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 COUNT-f'UF SAN LUIS OBISPO 10 11 DONALD ROCHELLE, ZELDA WEBB, ) Case No. 57791 et al. , ) 12 ) ORDER ON PLAINTIFF' S 13 Plaintiffs, ) MOTION TO RELIEVE RECEIVER AND RECEIVER' S 14 V. ) PETITION FOR MODIFICATION ) OF DUTIES 15 ATASCADERO LIMITED, et al. , ) ) s Defendants. ) Date: March 9, 1988 16 ) Time: 8:45 a.m. 17 ) Dept: II 18 The Plaintiff'-s "Motion to Relieve Receiver" and the 19 Receiver' s "Petition for Modification of Receiver' s Duties, " 20 each having been filed with this Court and Notice of Hearing 21 thereon having been served on all parties to this action and 22 other interested persons, the matters came on for hearing on 23 March 9, 1988, 8:45 a.m. in Department II of the above-entitled 24 Court before the Hon. Barry Hammer, Judge. Donald Rochelle and 25 Zelda Webb, Plaintiffs, appeared in person and by counsel, 26 Robert Weatherford. The Receiver appeared by counsel, Robert 27 Poyourow, and the Defendants appeared by counsel, Jeffrey 28 Brynan. � C(DPY r 1 WHEREUPON, the matters contained in the Plaintiff' s 2 Motion and the Receiver' s Petition being duly heard, and upon 3 consideration of the pleadings and upon the argument and 4 representations from counsel, the Court ORDERS: 5 1. The Plaintiff' s Motion to Relieve Receiver is 6 hereby DENIED; 7 2. The Receiver is authorized to enter into an 8 exclusive listing agreement with a broker or brokers of his 9 choice, upon a listing price and terms which he, in his 10 'ud ent shall J gm 11 determi ne, subject to the commission schedule 11 set forth in this Court' s Order of December 311 1986; 12 3. The terms and conditions of the December 31, 1986, 13 Order of this Court are hereby modified and superseded to the 14 extent inconsistent herewith; and 15 4. ' The Receiver is authorized to formally cancel 16 escrow with Anthony Lopes, to receive all funds on deposit 17 from escrow, and to hold the same until further Order of this 18 Court. 19 20 DATED: 21 BARRY HAMMER, 22 JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 ; VERIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF I have read the foregoing and know its co 0 CHECK APPLICABLE PARAGRAPH ❑ I am a party to this action. The matters stated in the foregoing document are true of my own knowledge except as to those matters which are stated on information and belief, and as to those matters I believe them to be true. ❑ 1 am ❑ an Officer ❑ a partner —02— — of a party to this action,and am authorized to make this verification for and lin its behalf.and I make this verification for that reason. ❑ 1 am informed and believe and on that ground allege that the matters stated in the foregoing document are true. ❑The matters stated in the foregoing document are true of my own knowledge except as to those matters which are stated on information and belief, and as to those matters 1 believe them to be true. " ❑ I"am one of the attorneys for a party to this action.Such party is absent from the county of aforesaid where such attorneys have their offices,and I make . ! this verification for and on behalf of that party for that reason. I am informed and believe and on that ground allege that The augers luted in the focirmng document are true. Esmutcd on 19 , rt , California. declare under penalty of pequry under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Type or Print Name Signature PROOF OF SERVICE 1013A 131 CCP Re.lsed 1/1/88 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF I am employed in the county of Los Angeles .State of California. I am over the age of IA and not a party to the within action: my business address is: 10960 Wilshire Boulevard, Tenth Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90024 On Mar. 16 r19'$8 • I served the foregoing document described as ORDER ON PLAINTIFF' S MOTION TO RELIEVE RECEIVER AND RECEIVER' S PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF DUTIES on all parties in this action ® by placing the true copies thereof enclosed in sealed envelopes addressed as stated on the attached mailing list: by placing ❑ the original ❑ a true copy thereof enclosed in sealed envelopes addressed as follows: BY HAIL ❑ •l deposited such cmclope 1n the mail 'It California- The envelope was mailed aith postage thereon fulls prepaid. © 1 caused such envelope to be deposited in the mail at Los Angeles California. The envelope was mailed with postage thereon fully prepaid. 1 am*'readily familiar"with firm's practice of collection and processing correspondence for hailing. It is deposited with U.S. postal service on that same day in the ordinary course of business.I am aware that on motion of party served•service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than I Jay after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit. Executed on March 16 19-R-8 . at Los Angeles , California. ❑ "(BY PERSONAL SERVICE) I delivered such envelope by hand to the offices of the addressee. 8 Executed on 19_, at California. (State) I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above is true and correct. (Federal) I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the har of this court at %%hose direction the service was made. j i� JENNIFER A KESSLER Ll i� �1 Type or Print Name signature STUANTS ExEIROOK TIAIESAVFR IWVSED 111;881 NEW DISCOVERY LAW 2030 AND 20]1 CCP f I:�A'..-1•.f ?. ,:1 --t 4s,.�4 In whl .FYVf uN'E 1\I7Y oe uSl'O n GMpMi Sole tM reveal Cou1151 .�rFNtiONI•:l i�.::S:.:AIU'*\,'I IN 111.AI.Or%4ti4 Nf.E R. • 1 _ a r . SERVICE LIST FOR ROCHELLEy ATASCADERO Samuel Krane Leonard Lebowitz Fischer, Krane, Jacobson & Kabat 1888 Century Park East Suite #350 Los Angeles, CA 90067 - Robert Weatherford 1014 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Donald Rochelle P.O. Box #2252 Atascadero, CA 93423 Jim Haun Haun Realty P.O. -Box #729 Atascadero, CA 93423 James Celmayster Merrill Lynch Realty 3938 State Street Santa Barbara, CA 93105 Joyce Poalillo Coldwell Banker Camino Real Properties 7450 Morro Road Atascadero, CA 93422 it . . �i],it B City of Atascadero Prior Staff Report STAFF REPORT FOR: Planning Commission Meeting Date: January 5 ,0871' BY: Joel Moses , Associate Planner Project Address : 905 E1 Camino Real SUBJECT: Tentative Parcel Map 30-85 initiated by Atascadero Limited (Don Rochelle/ Zelda Webb/Bethel & Associates) to subdivide 102.62 acres of land into four parcels ; 12.08 acres for RS(Residential Suburban) , 12.47 acres CT (Commercial Tourist) , 21.02 acres RS(Residential Suburban) , and 52.05 acres L (Recreation) . BACKGROUND: The proposed site was reviewed by the City during Annexation, Prezoning and Environmental Impact Report Hearings. An EIR was certified for the project and zoning established for the site over the last three years. Notice of public hearing was published in the Atascadero News on Friday, November 20, 1986. All property owners of record located within 300 feet of the subject property were also notified on that date. A. LOCATION: 905 E1 Camino Real B. SITUATION AND FACTS: 1. Request. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .To. subdivide 102.62 acres of land into four parcels of 12.08, 12.47, 21.02, and 5.05 acres for Residential, Com- mercial and Recreational zoned land. 2. Applicant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Atascadero Limited(Don Rochelle/Zelda Webb/Bethel & Associates) 3. Site Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .102.62 acres 4. Streets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .El Camino Real 5. Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . * , e * O * . . ,RS - Residential Suburban L Recreational CT - Commercial Tourist 6. Existing Use. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Residential/Agricultural t' STAFF REPORT - Con d0 0 TPM 30-85 905 E1 Camino Real 7. Adjacent Zoning and Use Count - Paso Robles Creek J g Y to Entire Study Area South: RS - Residential Suburban East : County - Salinas River West : County - Freeway 8. General Plan Designation. . . .Residential/Commercial/Recreational 9. Environmental Status . . . . . . . .Prior Certified EIR C. A14ALYSIS: The applicants have submitted a parcel map to subdivide property an- nexed to the City and previously zoned. The property is zoned for several types of uses : Commercial, Residential and Recreational. The site is also covered by several waterways (Graves Creek, Paso Robles Creek and the Salinas River) . Access to the site is gained by way of El Camino Real. Access from the freeway is not permitted. The site is currently used for a residence and agricultural use. The site is somewhat isolated due to the freeway and the waterways. The proposed annexation and zoning were reviewed in public hearings by the City and an E.I.R. certified for the sites proposed zoning and development. During the process, extensive public comment was given as to access to the site and zoning. The project was revised and the current zoning configuration approved. In reviewing the proposed Parcel Map, the staff has been concerned with the site' s access and internal circulation. After a meeting with CALTRANS (State of California) , who controls access location and design, it was determined that final access design and improvements would be held until the time of development of any of the parcels . To maintain options , large easements have been provided along the front of Parcels 1 & 2. The site is also split by the railroad. This presents an access problem that under the EIR was solved by the proposed construction of a grade separation (bridge) over the railroad tracks . As an interium solution, the applicant is provid- ing a private crossing. Ultimate development of higher density uses beyond this access point, will require the grade separation. The City' s General Plan and State Law provides for access and use of waterways for recreational uses. Since the site contains several waterways , General Plan conformity would require the establishment of access rights . D. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends conditional approval of Tentative Parcel Map 30-85 based on the Findings in Exhibit D and Conditions of Approval in Exhibit E. i JM:ph ATTACHMENTS : EXHIBIT A - Location Map EXHIBIT B -- Tentative Map EXHIBIT C - School Letter EXHIBIT D - Findings EXHIBIT E - Conditions ������AAAAo�oA������ ������oo��o� .q•� � MW o���,�'s�oAi��►�oA���illU�, . .000A�00000�,oo�oo�►!.��a,�. ►� •• � GIG C � ' w Jae �`e•�o�^ 5'a°` > a°y04,�e``�va y: •t Tri / p ' �C Vk t? A �o•c of l� ,cr � 4 4r, •tea«,, ���$ �� `o° �°0°e` �� �a� a? - - GJ N 1♦ m � + q2• pr o> a � a t''• N• u 5 > > Y qo y k4 . H a � ^ r q ^\ 2 Q Z O 2 N cc y �>.• w��� $�k� y Z mai �� - �m y� i x� � �o LO�i♦Z $o v^ 2 f _. P m / >e54°a o gyp Op ZA '1 e, a .0 M I i " F p m m 0 co �� r Z o �m n a C r e - -- 2 41 3 Z .� Z m CO " �^ f^ nca '2p 00 _ A CA IM wPsZ1UE pAE—l. W1F1i' -65 r J C.► D5- OL CATA I V\J0 (Z,L-M U(A E1LL• wLIMB°CSb-T) LEL r a M rnm TEMPLET .oi UNIFIED S CHO'01 DISTRICT � "Home of Tomorrow's Leaders" ED 9th and Main Streets OCT 2 319x6Route 2, Box 1 Templeton, CA 93465 (805) 434-1445 COMR�1NNiTl DEVEIOPMENj City of Atascadero Community Development Department PO Box 747 Atascadero, CA 93423 Re: Rochelle/Webb/Bethel Tentative Parcel Map '30-85, 905 E1 Camino Real -- - -- Gentlemen: We have received notice of the proposed subdivision of approximately- 102 acres of property described above. Please be advised that this District is severely impacted by the addition of any new dwelling units within the school district's boundaries. The schools of TUSD are already overcrowded, and the County Board of Supervisors has approved the District's request to levy Developers' Impact Fees, effective 11/23/86. due to the Board of. Trustees' findings of overcrowding within the District schools. In addition, there is new legislation recently signed which would allow the District to levy up to $1 .50 per square foot of habitable living space, including any fees levied under SB201 . Developers' Impact Fees. It is anticipated that the Templeton Unified School District Board of Trustees will implement such fees effective as soon as legally possible following 1/1/87, the effective date of such legislation. At the point of conversion to fee collection under the new law, SB201 fees would probably be discontinued by the County, and the new fees would be levied directly by the schools' Board of Trustees. If the TUSD does implement these new fees, Issuance of building permits - - - by any agency -so charged would be dependent on a "sign-off" from the. school district attesting to the mitigation of the Impact of the development by payment of .these fees. Although we were unable to respond by the October 6 Planning Commission meeting, we do wish these comments to be noted for development within the boundaries of the TUSD. If you have any questions, please give me a call . SI er y, Diana M. La sen Business Manager i TEMPLETON ELEMENTARY TEMPLETON HIGH �,K,• Bth&Main Streets /�� /� �.�y.,� f �y �. RL 2.Box 12 - EXI-111W S4 Aw(- a77t'` ' Templeton.CA 93465 -�y�y�.{� �+ �e•� ---�-,yam, �/y „.[� ss`4�)• . :- a (805)434.1841 i tri'`(►I`Y 1,�Getic.ir� /ter 1 / J 9�S EZ C~iyo ZCAL ATl'r_4CA rVrQr) Q rM I MY) EXHIBIT D - Findings TPM 30-85 905 E1 Camino Real FINDINGS ; 1. The creation of these parcels conforms to the Zoning Ordinance and the General Plan. 2. The creation of these parcels , in conformance with the recommended Conditions of Approval, will not have a significant adverse effect upon the environment. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for the project and was certified. 3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development that is proposed. 4. The site is physically suitable for the density of development that is proposed. 5. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish and wildlife or their habitat. 6. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvement will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision; or that substantially equivalent alternate easements are provided. 7. The proposed subdivision complies with Section 66474.6 of the State Subdivision Map Act as to methods of handling and discharge of waste. 1 0 EXHIBIT E - Conditions of Approval (REVISED 1/5/87) TPM 30-85 905 El Camino Real . CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. All development fees and/or assessments in effect at the time of building permit application, shall be paid at the time of building permit issuance, to the City of Atascadero and the Templeton Unified School District. 2. Public recreation easements covering the three water courses (Graves Creek, Paso Robles Creek and Salinas River) and areas 25-0" back from the top of the bank shall be shown on the final map. A 25.0" public access easement shall be provided from El Camino Real to Graves Creek on an alignment acceptable to City of Atascadero. 3. Prior to the residential or commercial development of Parcels 3 and 43, a grade separated railroad crossing shall be approved and con- structed to City and State Standards. A single residential struc- ture may be constructed on Parcels 3 and 4 if the structures are equiped with fire sprinkler systems as per N.F.P.A. #13d. A note so stating shall appear on the final map. 4. Public Improvements Plans , acceptable to both City of Atascadero and State of California (CALTRANS) , shall be reviewed and approved prior to the issuance of any permits for development of Parcels 1 and 2. Said improvements shall be installed along entire frontage of El Camino Real at the time of development of either parcel. This shall appear as a note on the final map. 5. Access rights along State Freeway R/W are relinquished and shall be addressed on final map along entire frontage. Submit proof of acceptance by CALTRANS for use of existing encroachment and speci- fying terms of agreement for said use. 6. Submit recorded grant of easement for encroachment within S.P.R.R. easement prior to construction of access road or recording final map , whichever is first. 7. Obtain encroachment permit from CALTRANS and construct encroachment for access road to their standards and specifications . 8.- Access road shall be constructed to serve all parcels , including structure-r,egaiired to cross Graves Creek to serve Parcel 4 and rail- road crossing or provide alternate access acceptable to the Depart- ment of Public Works and the Community Development Department (or bond for said improvements) prior to recording final map. 9. Plan and profile drawings of access road shall be submitted for approval by the Department of Public Works and the Community De- velopment Department prior to start of construction. Plans shall be designed to City standards ; 20" minimum width traveled way, 50' radius (minimum) curves , with turn around acceptable to approval by other agencies , as well 3s, the City. 0 • EXHIBIT E - Conditions of Approval (REVISED 1/5/87) TPM 30-85 905 E1 Camino Real Page Two 10. Access road shall be contained within designated easement as des- cribed on final map including all slopes , drainage structures , etc. Access easements shall also be P.U.E. `s 11. Detail plan showing intersection of. El Camino Real and Highway ramps in relation to subject subdivision and possible future street design shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works . An Offer of Dedication for future street may be required and shall be determined upon review of this plan. Dedication would be along the southerly subdivision boundary. 12. Area subject to inundation in 100year storm shall be delineated on final map and elevation of high water noted. 13. Three Benchmarks shall be set, spanning length of subdivision between the easterly and westerly boundaries, to be used as future reference points for determining limits of flood hazard zone prior to development. Location and elevation of each point shall be shown on final map. 14. Show location of all creeks and rivers on final map. 15. Prior to recording the final map, a soils investigation (as re- quired by the Map Act) shall be submitted, recommending corrective action which will prevent structural damage to each structure pro- posed to be constructed in the area where soils problems may exist. The date of such reports , the name of the engineer making the report, and the location where the reports are on file shall be noted on the final map. 16. Road improvement plans. prepared by a registered civil engineer must be submitted to and approved by the Public Works Department prior to recording the final map. 17. An offer of dedication shall be made to the public for the Public Utilities Easements . 18. Offers of dedication or easements shall be completed and recorded prior to or simultaneously to recording the final map. 19. Install all street signs , traffic delineation devices , warning and regulatory signs , guardrail, barricades , and other similar devices where required by the Public Works Director as per approved site plan. Signs shall be in conformance with the Public Works Depart- ment standards and the current State of California uniform sign chart. Installation of traffic devices shall be subject to review and modifications after construction. EXHIBIT E - Conditions of Approval (REVISED 1/5/87) TPM 30-85 905 El Camino Real Page Three 20. All existing and proposed utility easements , pipelines and other easements are to be shown on the final map. If there are other buildings or other restrictions related to the easements , they shall be noted on the final map. 21. A final map drawn in substantial conformance with the approved tentative map and in compliance with all conditions set forth herein shall be submitted for review and approval in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City Lot Division Ordinance prior to recordation. a. Monuments shall be set at all new property corners created and a registered civil engineer or licensed land surveyor shall indicate, by certificate on the final map, that corners have been set or shall be set by a date specific and that they will be sufficient to enable the survey to be retraced. b. A recently updated preliminary title report shall be submitted for review in conjuction with the processing of the final map. c. A preliminary subdivision guarantee shall be submitted for review in conjunction with the processing of the final map. 22. Approval of this tentative parcel map shall expire two years from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted pursuant to a written request prior to the expiration date. . MEET lI F8 • MEMORANDUM TO: City Council THROUGH: Ray Windsor, City Manager FROM: Paul M. Sensibaugh , Director of Public Works SUBJECT Establishment of Stop Intersection DATE November 4 , 1988 Recommendation : The Traffic Committee recommends that Council adopt the attached resolution establishing a stop intersection on Cabrillo at its intersection with Ensenada Avenue. (Resolution No. 108-88) Background: • This intersection is currently uncontrolled and the sign will provide a safe intersection. The Traffic Committee is also requesting that the Police Department patrol this area as frequently as possible since speed complaints have been recorded along Ensenada which is posted 25 MPH. Fiscal Impact : The cost of this improvement will be approximately $50 to be paid out of 1988/89 budgeted funds . RESOLUTION NO. 108-88 RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO DESIGNATING A STOP INTERSECTION ON CABRILLO AVENUE AT ENSENADA AVENUE WHEREAS, Section 4-2 . 801 et seq, of the Atascadero Municipal Code allows the City Traffic Engineer to determine the location of STOP intersections , and to place and maintain appropriate signs or markings indicating the same; and WHEREAS , the Atascadero Traffic Committee has recommended that establishing a STOP intersection on Cabrillo Avenue at Ensenada Avenue will improve a hazardous traffic situation . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Atascadero directs the City Traffic Engineer to place and maintain appropriate signs or markings indicating a STOP intersection at the location listed above . • On motion by and seconded by ,the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES : ABSENT: ADOPTED: ATTEST : BOYD C. SHARTIZ , City Clerk BONITA BORGESON, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT : JEFFREY G. JORGENSEN PAUL M. SENSIBAUG City Attorney Director of Public Works City Engineer MEETt �tGENDAADATEI� EM# � M E M O R A N D U M TO: City Council FROM: Ray Windsor, City Manager AAA, SUBJECT: Request for Contract Extension by Wil-Mar Disposal DATE : November 22, 1988 BACKGROUND I am attaching copy of the existing Solid Waste Collection Contract with Wil-Mar, which provides for a five-year franchise agreement. Under the terms of the contract referenced by Attorney Betty • Sanders in her letter to the City, dated 8/30/88, " . . .Contractor may appear before the City Council of the City at any time after each two (2) years of service under this agreement and request an additional two ( 2 ) year contractual period" . As indicated by Mrs . Sanders, Wil-Mar is requesting an additional two-year ex- tension, which, if approved, would become effective in January 1989 . In our meeting with Mrs . Sanders and Bill Gibbs, President of Wil-Mar, it was stated, for the record, that the extension of the agreement would permit Wil-Mar to move ahead with plans to purchase two additional pieces of capital equipment (rolling stock) . Staff is not aware of any major problems with the trash service, and I have not personally received any negative comments about Wil-Mar. In reading the existing contract, I note that it calls for an annual clean-up effort in conjunction with a City-wide program, and I would just like to say that I strongly urge the City to initiate this in the Spring of 1989 . With respect to the requirement of Wil-Mar to provide various insurances , we have checked the records and find that everything is in line with the terms and conditions as outlined. RECOMMENDATION That Council authorize a two-year extension of the contract with • Wil-Mar for solid waste collection and authorize the City Attor- ney to draw up the necessary resolution. RW:cw Attachment WRIGHT & SANDERS A LAW CORPORATION WILLIAM D. WRIGHT (RETIRED) 5950 ENTRAOA AVENUE TELEPHONE 0 BETTY R. SANOERS POST OFFICE BOX 6001 (805) 466-9026 ROBERT DIMITRIJEVICH ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA 93423 August 30, 1988 Mr. Paul Sensibaugh Director of Public Works City of Atascadero 6500 Palma Avenue Atascadero, CA 93422 Re: Solid Waste Collections Contract Dear Mr. Sensibaugh: Pursuant to the terms of the contract entered into between Wil-Mar Disposal and the City of Atascadero in May, 1985, Wil-Mar requests an additional 2 years extension of its contractual period . • The contract language states , "Contractor may appear. before the City Council of the City at any time after each two ( 2) years of service under this agreement and request an additional two ( 2) year contractual period . " The present contract became operative on January 1, 1986 . We are, therefore, well beyond the first 2 years . Please advise me if you require further information. Bill Gibbs and I would be pleased to discuss the matter with you at your convenience. I look forward to hearing from you . Very truly yours, BETTYR. SANDERS BRS/baw C .C. Bill Gibbs FILE COPY SOLID WASTE COLLECTION CONTRACT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 13th day of May , 1985 , by and between the CITY OF ATASCADERO, a political subdivision of the State of California, hereinafter called "City" , and WIL-MAR DISPOSAL COMPANY, INC. , a California corporation , hereinafter called "Contractor" . Witnesseth For and in consideration of the payments to be made by Contractor to City, and in further consideration of the full and faithful performance by Contractor of all terms , covenants , . and conditions of this Agreement , as well as complete compliance with the laws of the State of California and all pertinent present and future ordinances and resolutions of the City; It is mutually agreed as follows : 1 . Scone of Work. Contractor shall provide all labor , materials , tools , and equipment necessary to perform all work required to collect and haul all solid waste from locations within City in accordance with this Agreement . i 5/8/85 - 1 - 2 . Term. The term of this Agreement shall January 1, 1986. extend for five (5) years f r o m ithW)Wa/W/qV I/1/S/ However , Contractor may appear before the City Council of the City at any time after each two (2 ) years of service under this agreement and request an additional two (2) year contractual period . The granting of an additional two (2 ) year contractual period shall be discretionary with the City. The length of contract shall not exceed five (5) years at any time of contractual period . 3 . Performance. Contractor shall provide a minimum of weekly regular collection for its customers with collection hours limited to 6 : 30 A.M. to 7: 00 P.M. in residential areas and 6 : 00 A.M. to 9: 00 P.M. in commercial areas . Contractor shall insure that cans or bins are returned to the same location from which removed to dump contents into the collection truck . 4 . Cleanup Efforts . Contractor agrees to participate in official City cleanup efforts and may be required to provide trash bins or trucks at convenient locations for use by the public at no charge to City. This requirement may not be imposed for any longer than one week, once during the calendar year . 5 . Free Services to City Facilities . Contractor agrees to provide solid waste disposal to City facilities , as well as to service public trash receptacles in the business district , at no charge . Such City facilities shall include , but not be limited to , the 5/8/85 2 - Administration Building, the Fire Department , the Corporation Yard on Traffic Way, the Sanitation Division, the City Park and Zoo, Alvord Field, Henderson Field, South Atascadero Park, and any other additional City facilities . This condition does not apply to construction debris or any other solid waste generated off the public facilities premises . Trash receptacles used for City facilities and those lcoated on sidewalks within the business district shall be serviced once per week or sooner if required. 6 . Rates for Service . Contractor agrees to perform such collection services at the rates established by resolution of the Council . 7 . Maintenance of Equipment. A. Trucks . All trucks shall be kept in good condition regularly by steam cleaning , and oil leaks shall be eliminated . All trucks shall pass a California Highway Patrol (C.H.P. ) safety inspection annually. B. Commercial Bins . Commercial bins shall have lids , * be watertight , cleaned and painted regularly, a minimum of once per year . 8 . Indemnification, Bond, and Insurance Reauirements . A. Indemnification. Contractor agrees to indemnify, defend , and save harmless , City and its officers , agents , and employees from and against any and all liability , claims , demands , costs , expenses , damages , . judgments , and causes of action in any way arising out of 5/ 8/85 3 - this Agreement , or out of the performance or attempted performance of the provisions hereof , including but not limited to any act or omission to act by Contractor or its agents , employees , or independent contractors directly responsible to Contractor . B. Bond Reauirements . Contractor agrees to furnish a cash or surety bond to City in the sum of Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50 ,000 .00 ) , conditioned upon the faithful performance of this Agreement and the provisions of the City Municipal Code . In lieu of the above, City may, at its discretion , accept some other type of financial arrangement guaranteeing City payment in case of nonperformance under the terms of this Agreement . C. Workers Compensation Insurance. Contractor agrees to procure , carry , and keep in full force and effect during the life of this Agreement , full compensation insurance with an insurance carrier as defined by and in accordance with the provisions of the Labor Code of the State of California . Contractor shall furnish a copy of the certificate of insurance to City. D . Public Liability Insurance. Contractor agrees to procure , carry, and keep in full force and effect during the life of this Agreement , public liability insurance with a carrier agreeable to City to the extent of Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500 ,000 .00 ) for the death or injury to one person , and One Million Dollars ( $1 ,000 ,000 .00 ) for the death or injury to more than S 5/8/85 4 - one person , and property damage insurance to the extent of One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100 ,000 .00 ) upon each of the trucks or vehicles used by Contractor in carrying out the work called for in this Agreement , said insurance to cover both Contractor and City, with City, its officials , and its employees named as additional insureds . Contractor agrees to provide City with a copy of the insurance contract , with a rider attached thereto providing that the insurance contract shall not be cancelled for nonpayment of premium or otherwise , without thirty ( 30 ) days prior written notice to City , sent by certified mail , directed to the attention of the City Manager . 9 . Pavment to Citv. Contractor hereby promises and agrees to pay to City for the rights and privileges herein granted , five percent ( 5%) of the gross cash receipts of the garbage , refuse and rubbish collection business conducted by Contractor within City, said amounts to be payable monthly on or before the fifteenth (15th) day of the ensuing month , and said payment shall cover the gross cash receipts for the month preceding the payment date . The revenue received under this provision shall be placed in City ' s General Fund . Payment not made by the fifteenth ( 15th ) day of the month shall bear interest at the rate of twelve percent (12% ) . 10 . Accounting Records . Within Contractor ' s accounting records , all items of revenue and expense for 5/8/85 5 - ` •( operations pertaining to the services provided by this Agreement shall be complete and clearly defined . The accounting and statistical records of such revenue and expense items shall be adequately segregated to meet the needs of analysis for rate making. Contractor ' s records shall be available for audit at any time during usual business hours . This provision shall be accomplished within one (1) year of the execution of this Agreement . 11 . Identification of Eauioment. Contractor shall clearly identify all refuse trucks and commercial bins with the firm name and telephone number . Contractor shall require its crewmen to wear clean uniforms with a conspicuous firm name and employer identifier on the uniform. 12 . Identification of Violations . Contractor shall attach a tag designating a reason for noncollection to any can or container not being collected because of being overweight or for other violations . 13 . Maintenance of Office. Contractor shall maintain an office within City where bills may be paid, services applied for , and . complaints made , which office shall be equipped with a telephone and shall have a responsible person in charge during usual business hours . 14 . Complaints . A copy of all written complaints and statements of all verbal complaints received by Contractor or its employees shall be maintained by Contractor with a duplicate copy forwarded to City , 5/8/85 6 attention of the City Manager , at least once per month , no later than the fifth ( 5th) calendar day following the month in which the complaint was received . Said records shall be maintained for the term of this Agreement . 15 . Rules and Regulations . Contractor shall , at its expense , mail annually to each subscriber a statement of rules , container limitations , fees , telephone numbers , and other pertinent information. 16 . Failure to Perform. Upon the failure or omission of Contractor to keep , fulfill , or perform any of the terms , provisions , or conditions of this Agreement , or of the City Municipal Code , and the failure of Contractor to remedy or correct any such failure or omission within twenty ( 20 ) days after notice in writing of such failure or omission , this Agreement shall , at the option of City officials by resolution of the City Council , be terminated and ended , and Contractor shall thereafter have no further rights , powers , or privileges as granted by City under or arising through this Agreement . 17 . Assignment Prohibited . This Agreement shall not be assigned or sublet without the approval of the City Council . 18 . Effect of Litigation . In the event that a court of competent jurisdiction declares that this Agreement is void by reason of the application of the Federal Antitrust Law or the California Antitrust Law, then this Agreement shall be of no further force and effect , and City 5/8/85 7 - shall have the right to contract for solid waste collection services from other sources . 19 . Notices . All notices to be given to Contractor may be given in writing personally or by depositing in the U. S. Mail , postage prepaid, addressed as follows : Wil-Mar Disposal Company, Inc . P. O. Box 1199 Atascadero, CA 93423 All notices to be given to City may be given in writing personally or by depositing in the U. S. Mail , postage prepaid, addressed as follows : City Manager City of Atascadero P. 0. Box 747 Atascadero, CA 93423 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement the day and year first above set forth . This Agreement shall become operative after January 1, 1986. CITY OF ATASCADERO WIL-MAR DISPOSAL COMPANY, INC. e"Qq'- ROLFE 'ZiELSON, Mayor WILLIAM GIBBS , President APPROVED AS TO CONTENT; MINNIE GARIBALDI, Secretary- Treasurer . ATTEST: MICHAEL SHELTON, City Manager ROBERT JONES , City Clerk 5/8/85 8 - MEETI ,,AAGENDAe � DATE. fW G'�TEMM • M E M O R A N D U M Gv✓1 to) 7W S 7�NCJ/1 TO: Chief of Police �c�—co�+Mcp4vA7,7Q<J AAO rME"'r"E" FROM: Support Services Coordinator R0L?"Q r 0'-Jr �► C CtX+nt e�i fit G[7�ib R SUBJ: Public Safety Dispatcher Program DATE: Nov. 3, 1988 !1 '3-88 BACKGROUND: Penal Code Section 13510 has been amended to require the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training to establish minimum selection and training standards for local public safety dispatchers. The Commission adopted the below described standards for agencies which participate in the program which will become effective 1-1-89: -a thorough background investigation; -a medical examination; . -an evaluation of oral communication skills; satisfactory completion of a POST-certified, 80-hour Basic • Complaint/Dispatcher course within 12 months of the date of hire; and -a minimum of 12 months probation. Only participating agencies will be eligible for reimbursement of certain dispatcher training costs. To participate in the Public Safety Dispatcher Program, an agency must submit a letter to the Commission requesting participation, accompanied by a copy of an ordinance pledging adherence to the standards adopted by the Commission. (As you will note, we currently adhere to the program requirements, however, without the ordinance and request to POST, effective 1-1-89, we will no longer be reimbursed for the POST training.) Attached is a proposed ordinance for City Council review and adoption. Once approved, I will forward a copy with a letter to POST. RECOMMENDATION: I request that the attached proposed ordinance, in whatever format is appropriate, be approved by City Council so that our City may continue to participate in POST-funded training programs for our dispatchers. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no cost to the City for participation in this program. SANDI BARTELT Sb + ORDINANCE NO. 185 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF // ATASCADERO ACCEPTING THE PENAL CODE REQUIREM 14TS • RELATING TO THE SELECTION AND TRAINING STANDS OF PUBLIC SAFETY pISPATCHERS The City Council of the City of Atascadero does orcin as follows: SECTION 1. The City of Atascadero declares that it 4'esires to qualify to receive aid from the State of California under the provisions of Section 13522, Chapter 1, of Title 4, Part 4, of the Cali ornia Penal Code. SECTION 2. Pursuant to Section 13510(c) , Chap er 1, the City of Atascadero will adhere to standards for recruitment and raining established by the California Commission on Peace Officer Stan rds and Training (POST) . SECTION 3. Pursuant to Section 13512, C pter 1, the Commission and its representatives may make such inquiries as deemed appropriate by the Commission to ascertain that the City f Atascadero's public safety dispatcher personnel adhere to standards for se ction and training established by the Commission on Peace Officer Standar s and Training.. SECTION 4. This Ordinance shall o into effect and be in full force and effect on 12:01 am. on January 1989. On motion by Councilmem r and seconded by Councilmember the m tion was approved by the following roll call vote: • AYES.• NOES: ABSENT: ADOPTED: ATTEST: BOYD C. S RITZ, City Clerk BONITA BORGESON, Mayor APPROVE AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: RIC RD H. MCHALE JEFFREY G. JORGENSEN Chi f of Police City Attorney • RE: ITEM C-1 • *EASE REPLACE THE ORD. 185 IN YOUR AGENDA PACKET WITH THE ATTACHED, REVISED COPY. C., 4 A G -a'S OFFICE ORDINANCE NO. 185 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO ACCEPTING THE PENAL CODE REQUIRE- MENTS RELATING TO THE SELECTION AND TRAINING STANDARDS OF PUBLIC SAFETY DISPATCHERS The Council of the City of Atascaderodoesordain as follows: Section 1. Atascadero Municipal Code Section 2-11. 04 is hereby amended by adding subsection 2-11. 04 (c) to read as follows: (c) Pursuant to the provisions of Section 13510 (c) of the State Penal Code, the City of Atascadero will adhere to standards for recruitment and training of public safety dispatchers estab- lished by the California Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST) . Further, pursuant to the provisions of Section 13512 of the State Penal Code, the Commission and its representatives may • make such inquiries as deemed appropriate by the Commission to ascertain that the City of Atas- cadero's public safety dispatcher personnel adhere to standards for selection and training established by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training. Section 2 . Publication. The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published once within fifteen (15) days after its passage in the Atascadero News, a newspaper of general circulation, printed, published and circulated in this City in accordance with Government Code Section 36933 ; shall certify the adoption of this ordinance; and shall cause this ordinance and certification to be entered in the Book of Ordinances of this City. Section 3 . Effective Date. This ordinance shall go into effect and be in full force and effect at 12 : 01 a.m. on the thirty-first (31st) day after its passage. On motion by Council member and seconded by Council member the foregoing ordinance is hereby adopted in its entirety by the following roll call vote: • ORDINANCE NO. 185 Page 2 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: DATE ADOPTED: CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA By BONITA BORGESON, Mayor ATTEST: BOYD C. SHARITZ, City Clerk • APPROVED AS TO FORM: /EtEY RG SEN, City Attorney APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: RICHARD H. McHALE, Police Chief JGJ• . fr C:ORATA676 SEE GENDA DAT -_ E/ M • MEMORANDUM City of Atascadero TO: Ray Windsor, City Manager FROM: Jeffrey G. Jorgensen, City Attorney SUBJECT: Duck Ordinance Attached for your consideration is a proposed ordinance prohibiting the abandonment of waterfowl at Atascadero Lake, as requested by the City Council at the September 13, 1988 Council meeting. Please feel free to contact me at your convenience if you have questions or comments concerning the ordinance. Sincerely, FREY JORGENSEN City A torney • JGJ:fr A:MMATA350 Attachment cc: City Council • • ORDINANCE NO. 182 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO AMENDING TITLE 4 OF THE ATAS- CADERO MUNICIPAL CODE ENTITLED ANIMALS, RELATING TO THE ABANDONMENT OF WATERFOWL AT ATASCADERO LAKE The Council of the City of Atascadero does ordain as follows: Section 1. Section 4-1.403 is hereby added to the Atascadero Municipal Code, and shall read as follows: Section 4-1.403 . Abandonment of Waterfowl at Atascadero Lake. It is unlawful for any owner or person having possession or control of any waterfowl, including but not limited to ducks, geese, swans, poultry, or household pets, to place, abandon, or release such waterfowl, or cause to permit such waterfowl to be placed, abandoned, or released, or to knowingly allow or permit such waterfowl to remain in or upon the waters of • Atascadero Lake, or upon any public land adjacent thereto. Any person who violates this section is guilty of an infraction. Section 2 . Publication. The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published once within fifteen (15) days after its passage in the Atascadero News, a newspaper of general circulation, printed, published and circulated in this City in accordance with Government Code Section 36933 ; shall certify the adoption of this ordinance; and shall cause this ordinance and certification to be entered in the Book of Ordinances of this City. Section 3 . Effective Date. This ordinance shall go into effect and be in full force and effect at 12 : 01 a.m. on the thirty-first (31st) day after its passage. On motion by Council member and seconded by Council member the foregoing ordinance is hereby adopted in its entirety by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: • 0 � ORDINANCE NO. 182 Page 2 ABSENT: DATE ADOPTED: CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA By BONITA BORGESON, Mayor ATTEST: BOYD C. SHARITZ, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: EFpEY G. RG SEN, City Attorney d APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: JGJ: fr/9/15/88 C:ORATA668 �MEETt GENDA DATE4� TEM M e 3 • MEMORANDUM City of Atascadero November 10, 1988 TO: Ray Windsor, City Manager FROM: Jeffrey G. Jorgensen, City Attorney SUBJECT: Ordinance Changing Time of City Council Meetings Attached please find an ordinance which would amend Section 2- 1. 01 of the Atascadero Municipal Code to change the time of City Council meetings from 7: 30 to 7: 00 p.m. Please submit to the Council as you feel appropriate. Sincerely, e!//R�EYG. OR ENSEN City Att rney • JGJ: fr A:MMATA442 Attachment • • ORDINANCE NO. 186 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO AMENDING TITLE 2 OF THE ATASCADERO MUNICIPAL CODE, ENTITLED "ADMINISTRATION" The Council of the City of Atascadero ordains as follows: Section 1. Section 2-1. 01 of the Atascadero Municipal Code is amended to change the time of regular meetings of the Atascadero City Council from 7: 30 p.m. to 7: 00 p.m. and shall read as follows: Section 2-1. 01. Meetings. The Council shall hold regular meetings in the Rotunda Room, fourth floor, Administration Building, 6500 Palma Avenue, Atascadero, every second and fourth Tuesday evening at 7: 00 p.m. and on such other days, at such other times, as may be designated in an order for a special meeting. A special meeting may be ordered in accordance with the provisions of Sections 54956 and 54956.5 of the Government Code of the State. When the day for any regular meeting of the Council • falls on a legal holiday, the meeting shall not be held on such holiday, but shall be held at the same hour on the next succeeding day thereafter which is not a holiday, or at such other time as shall be determined and noticed by the Council. Section 2 . Publication. The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published once within fifteen (15) days after its passage in the Atascadero News, a newspaper of general circulation, printed, published and circulated in this City in accordance with Government Code Section 36933 ; shall certify the adoption of this ordinance; and shall cause this ordinance and certification to be entered in the Book of Ordinances of this City. Section 3 . Effective Date. This ordinance shall go into effect and be in full force and effect at 12 : 01 a.m. on the thirty-first (31st) day after its passage. On motion by Council member and seconded by Council member , the foregoing ordinance is hereby adopted in its entirety by the following roll call vote: • • ORDINANCE NO. 186 Page 2 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: DATE ADOPTED: CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA By BONITA BORGESON, Mayor ATTEST: BOYD C. SHARITZ, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: is EY G. O ENSEN, City Attorney APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: JGJ: fr C:ORATA675 MEET I ENOA DATE M� �� • MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Mayor and Citv Council Through : Ray Windsor , City Manager From: Paul M. Sensibaugh , Director of Public Works/City Engineer Subject : Award of the Design for the Santa Rosa/ECR Traffic Signal Date : November 16 . 1988 Recommendation : Staff recommends the selection of Keith B. Higgins & Assoc . . Inc , of Gilroy to perform the above design . and that Council direct staff to bring back an contract in the amount of $10. 600 plus allowance for FAU mandatory plan checks not included in the RFP. Background: Please refer to the attached staff memo from October 11 . • Discussion: Only two proposals were returned out of the six invited. Higgins and North Coast Engineering, Inc . (John McCarthy , Traffic Engineer) both indicated that they met the scope of services and both have been involved in comparable projects in the past and both are well qualified to perform the work. Higgins will do the work within 11 weeks from the notice to proceed, and North Coast 12 weeks after start which will be within two weeks of the notice to proceed. North Coast' s proposal is for $11 . 167 . Higgins is for $10, 100 after taking out the $500 for the timing which is not included in North Coast' s design phase figure, but in their construction estimate . The contract will include the attached Scope of Services and will include language to comply with FAU regulations . Addition money for FAU plan reviews outside the scope of the RFP, which did not include FAU financing, will be on a time and material basis . Fiscal Impact : The revenue resource will be the Traffic Development Impact Fee account . • DAAGEND!L.ETI �� CTEMl ;,L MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Through: Ray Windsor, City Manager From: Paul M. Sensibaugh, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Subject : Request for Proposals for a Traffic Signal at the Santa Rosa/E1 Camino Real Intersection Date : October 4, 1988 Recommendation: Staff recommends that Council authorize staff to request proposals for the design of the above project . Background: The above intersection has been recently impacted by the new Post * Office facility and southside multiple family residences . It • is- assumed that this intersection will now meet the necessary signal warrants that could not be met prior to the opening of the Post Office . The Planning Commission, City Council and City Staff have all suggested that this project be moved up in the priority ranking once the Post Office opened. Discussion: The design for the above signal will cover any geometric changes or recommendations for median deviders along the E1 Camino Real frontage . The Scope of Services is attached for Council ' s review. This work is not on the Caltrans system but is on the Federal Aid Urban system. Therefore, since we are suggesting FAU funds below, the City will have to use the consultant selection guidelines presented by Caltrans, including encouragement of DBE firms. Fiscal Impact : Contributions from the Bordeaux House project and the Post Office facility amount to $50, 000 or approximately 50% of the cost of a new traffic signal . Another $23, 000 is expected from the Proposed bowling alley project nearby and $2, 000 has been committed by two smaller projects within the area . The remaining funds, aproximately $25, 000, not including median islands if necessary, will come from future Traffic Development Impact Fees . • • Staff suggests that this project be submitted as a Federal Aid - . Urban project which provides 100% funding for signalization work. The current budget shows the City's share of FAU funds for bridges recieving grants, but that money cannot be used to match other federal monies . The above contribution money will go into the Traffic Development Fee fund initially but will have to be transfered to the Bridge Development Fee account at a later date to replace the FAU funds which will be used for the signal . October 4, 1988 Name Title Street Address P.O.Box No. City, State Zip Dear Consultant : You are invited to submit a proposal to the City of Atascadero to provide a design for a Traffic Signal and Traffic Control for the E1 Camino Real/Santa Rosa intersection. Your • proposal should be based upon the following Scope of Services : Scope of Services 1) Analysize the existing intersection with respect to geometrics and signal warrants . 2) Design a traffic signal and lane geometrics for the Projected ADT for the year AD 2000 based upon current zoning. Include known proposed projects in the vicinity of 1/2 mile radius . 3) Provide plans and specifications for the above design, including 20 scale drawings and phasing and timing diagrams . 4) Gather existing plans, maps traffic counts and other data. The City will provide any maps, records or other data that it has readily available, upon request . The consultant should satisfy himself/herself prior to submittal as to what information is available . 5) Provide Construction Engineering estimates, including the timing of the signal on the assumption that the signal will be bid within 6 months after approval of the design. 6) Review the results with the Director of Public Works . The consultant will be expected to meet with staff at least on a weekly basis at the discretion of the Director and at least once before the City Council . At least one major review will be Provided to the City Prior to submitting the final drawings . Two weeks shall be given for such review and three (3) draft copies shall be Provided. 7) The consultant shall present the City with background information on his/her firm and the key individual (s) that will work on this Project . A contact person will be named if the Proposal is accepted. Personnel and available resources will be a determining factor for award. 8) The consultant shall give a fee based on a lump sum, not to exceed figure and shall include all incidental costs such as Printing, travel , etc . Additional compensation shall not be awarded. Progress payments are permissible with a 10% retention. 9) The consultant shall estimate a time of completion for the work. Time of completion may be a consideration for award. The consultant shall provide fifteen (15) copies and one original . of the completed work. The City will complete the Bidding and Negotiating Phase with the Notice to Bidders to be provided by the Consultant . 10) The consultant shall be expected to enter into a agreement with the City for the above work which will be prepared by the City Attorney and is expected to provide limited liability insurance, not less than $500, 000 unencumbered. We look forward to your submittal and are ready to answer any questions that you may have . Proposals are due on or before 2 : 00pm, November 9, 1988 at the office of the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. Very Truly Yours, Paul M. Sensibaugh, Director of Public Works/ City Engineer KEITH Y.OHIGGINS & AssolIATES.. IN.C. Civil and Traffic Engineers November 8, 1988 Paul M. Sensibaugh Director of Public Works City of Atascadero P.O. Box 747 Atascadero, CA 93423 Re: Proposal to Prepare E1 Camino Real/Santa Rosa Road Traffic Signal Design, City of Atascadero Dear Paul, It is with great pleasure that we respond to your Request For Proposal dated October 4, 1988 for the above referenced project. Our design team includes Richard A. Gordon as well as myself. Mr. Gordon's responsibilities will be channelization and signal design, while I will be overseeing the work and will conduct the necessary traffic studies indicated in the scope of work. The following proposal outlines the specific tasks to be performed in conjunction with this project. The total fee for this project will be $10,600. The intersection traffic study will be submitted within five weeks of notice to proceed. A draft signal plan will be submitted within six weeks of acceptance of the traffic study. A list of representative projects including references and resumes of the team members are also included. As you know, we have recent experience in the project vicinity including traffic studies for Plaza Madrid (which included an analysis of this intersection) , Oaks Shopping Plaza Expansion and McNamara Shopping Center. We have recently completed the design of a traffic signal at the E1 Camino Real/Palomar intersection as well. We believe our local experience will be an asset for this project. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions regarding this proposal. Thank you for the opportunity to submit a proposal for this project. Respectfully submitted, Keith B. Higgins, CE TE gg � s KBR/k ah P.O. Box 628 Gilroy, California 95021-0628 (408) 848-3122 • KEITH B. tIGGINS & ASSOCIATES, I.NC. Civil and Traffic Engineers PROPOSAL TO PREPARE EL CAMINO REAL/SANTA ROSA ROAD TRAFFIC SIGNAL DESIGN CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA Submitted to :J City of Atascadero Public Works Department Submitted by Keith B. Higgins & Associates, Inc. Civil and Traffic Engineers November 8, 1988 P.O. Box 628 Gilroy, California 95021-0628 (408) 848-3122 TASK 1 FIELD SURVEY, TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS AND CAPACITY AND PHASING STUDY This task will determine the capacity requirements of the intersection for the year 2000, prepare a warrant study and determine the location of traffic signal hardware required, and identify any location problems that my be evident. We will work closely with the City Planning and Public Works Departments to identify future development projects in order to define a Year 2000 development scenario. A formal report presenting the findings of the study as well as a conceptual intersection geometric and signal plan will be prepared. TASK 2 BASE PLAN An underground location and planimetrics map will be compiled from City and Public Utility records. TASK 3 SIGNING AND STRIPING PLAN This task will be conducted to analyze the field data and other information and prepare a working striping geometries plan suitable as a signal design base drawing. TASK 4 TRAFFIC SIGNAL DESIGN AND SPECIFICATIONS This task will consist of selecting components and preparing a traffic signal design, working drawings and specifications. TASK 5 PLAN REVIEW AND CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATES The resulting geometries design, traffic signal design and cost estimates will be reviewed with the City staff. TASK 6 OPERATION IMPLEMENTATION The goal of this task will be to provide the City of Atascadero with proper signal timing for the intersection. r TASK NO. DESCRIPTION COST 1 Traffic Study $ 2,500 2 Base Map (Existing Planimetrics and Utilities) 1 ,000 3 Striping Plan 800 4 Signal Plan and Specifications 5,000 5 Plan Review and Cost Estimates 800 6 Operation Implementation (Signal Timing) 500 TOTAL COST $10,600 JiF!o!o 0 Note: Work beyond the outlined scope will be billed on a time and expenses basis in accordance with the attached fee schedule. This includes civil engineering necessary to complete any intersection capacity improvements. i 9 9 9 I 7 7 � a 7 KEITH B. HIGGINS & ASSOCIATES, INC. ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES FEE SCHEDULE Effective through June, 1989 PERSONNEL Classification Rate per Hour Senior Engineer $ 80.00 Associate Engineer 60.00 Junior Engineer, Engineering Aide 45 .00 Technician, Draftsman 40.00 Clerical, Wordprocessing 30 .00 Messenger 20.00 Minimum Consultation Fee 100.00 Expert Witness (Rates Available Upon Request) SUB-CONSULTANTS Professional Service by Others Actual Cost + 10% EXPENSES Materials, Reproduction, Telephone Actual Cost + 15% Auto Expenses $0.25 per mile Travel Expenses Actual Cost + 10% CLASSIFICATION TYPES OF ACTIVITY Senior Engineer Project Management and Scheduling Associate Engineer Liaison and Work Session Meetings Junior Engineer Field Investigation Technician Field Data Retrieval/Summarization Other Classifications Self-explanatory PROJECT LOCATION DESCRIPTION REFERENCE City of Gilroy New traffic signal, ECONOLITE ASC Norm Allen Tenth St./ 8000 with OPTICOM preemption and Gilroy City Engineer Alexander St. ; striping changes. 7351 Rosanna Street Gilroy, CA 95020 Tenth St./ Traffic signal upgrade, detection 408/848-9322 Chestnut St, ; New controller; ECONOLITE ASC 8000 with OPTICOME preemption and striping changes. Tenth St./ Signal upgrade; Model 170 with Monterey St. OPTICOM preemption and striping changes. County of New traffic signal, Model 170 Ron Lundquist Monterey including striping changes. Traffic Engineer & Caltrans Monterey County Dist. 5 312 E. Alisal SR156/Vierra Salinas, CA 93901 Canyon Road 408/755-4800 SR156/ New traffic signal, Model 170 Prunedale North Road City of Marina Signal modifications. Vince DiM aggio Reservation/ Geometric and striping changes. Public Works Dir. Seacrest City of Marina 211 Hillcrest Marina CA 93955 Al City of New traffic signal, Model 170 Paul Sensibaugh Atascadero Public Works Dir. E1 Camino Real/ _ City of Atascadero Palomar Avenue i i i i i i 1 � i 1 f i 1 I � I KEITH B. HIGGINS & ASSOCIATES, INC. CIVIL AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERS KEITH B . HIGGINS - PRINCIPAL ENGINEER =='CCS;=- DATA rofessional Registration: 31 Civil Engineer California Traffic Engineer - California Professional Organizations : American Public Works Association American Society of Civil Engineers California Council of Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors (Inactive) California Public Parking Association Institute of Transportation Engineers Tau Beta Pi, Engineering Honor Association Transportation Research Board Technical Committees and Publications : Institute of Transportation Engineers Technical Committee - SB-4 "Effectiveness of Median Storage and Acceleration Lanes for Left-Turning Vehicles" Institute of Transportation Engineers Technical Committee 5B-9 , "Urban Intersection Redesign Standards - Curb Ramps" Community Affilitations: Committee Appealing for Road Safety (Highway 156 ) Gilroy Chamber of Commerce - North Monterey County Mothers and Highway 101 Bypass Committee - Safety and Research Sub-committee Chairman Pacheco Pass (Highway 152) - Policy Statement Formulation Salinas Area Chamber of Commerce Transportation Committee, Chairman Task Force to Improve Monterey County Transportation Traffic Engineer - City of Morgan Hill (On-going Contract) • EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND 1971 - 197 r_lifo^^i3 Po' ..to-h-1 State San Luis Obispo, California Bachelor of Science :with Honors in Transportation !ngi^aer ing PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND 1982 - Pres. Keith B. Higgins and Associates, Inc. Civil and Traffic Engineers Gilroy, California President 1980 - 1982 William G. Dryden, Consulting Engineer Monterey, California Associate Civil Engineer 1978 - 1980 Ruth & Going, Inc. San Jose, California Assistant Civil Engineer 1977 — 1978 Design and Engineering Systems Redwood City, California Junior Civil Engineer 1976 - 1977 Processing and Distribution Engineering Consultants, Inc. San Jose, California Concept and Planning Analyst 1975 - 1976 Pullman-Kellogg Corp . , Mechanical Contractor Avila Beach, California Draftsman 7 RICHARD. A. G*DON (805)546-9937 TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANT W.O. Box 4256 San Luis Obispo, CA 93403 R E S U M E PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Traffic Signals, Systems and Designs - Designed new traffic signal instal- lations and upgraded old signals and signal systems. Computer Use - Utilized computer programs for traffic signal optimization such as Passer 11, Transyt 7 and others, using an IBM computer. Computer Aided Design and Drafting System - Prepare plans for traffic signals, using AUTOCAD on IBM computer. Special Projects - Prepared preliminary conceptual designs for signalized intersections for a light rail project; coordinated and timed a "Trac" system; maintained official traffic signal records for signalized intersections; testified as a witness; prepared timing schedules and carried out special signal projects; handled public inquiries concerning traffic signal problems. Signing, Striping and Channelization - Designed and prepared striping and signing plans; designed and supervised installation of a thermo plastic demonstration project. Traffic Studies - Directed traffic engineering studies; planned, supervised, scheduled, and conducted traffic volume, speed, and warrant studies; conducted origin and destination, parking analysis, and traffic safety studies. Traffic Control Device Inventories - Initiated traffic control device inven- tories, including coordination of video tape logging by consultants for a computerized traffic control device inventory. Transportation Demand Studies - Prepared comprehensive traffic demand studies and traffic forecasting studies for various city routes, including Ali capacity studies. Parking Studies, Characteristics, and Designs - Conducted parking studies and designed on and off-street parking facilities; Prepared study concepts for a parking lot for a county fairground, and prepared designs for park and ride facilities. Highway Design - Planned the geometric design of streets and roadways. Carried out various studies, and recommended necessary changes in highway designs. Prepared conceptual designs for 133 miles of regional arterial highways. RICHARD A. GORDON Page Two CLIENTS KEITH B. HIGGINS 6 ASSOC., INC., Gilroy, CA KCA ENGINEERS, INC. , San Francisco, CA E. P. THOMSON ASSOCIATES, Alameda, CA TJKM TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, Pleasanton, CA WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES, San Francisco, CA BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. , Newport Beach, CA BSI CONSULTANTS, INC. San Diego, CA (Santa Ana, CA Office) BRYAN & MURPHY ASSOC., INC., Walnut Creek, CA BISSELL E KARN, INC., Pleasanton, CA EMPLOYMENT HISTORY 1983 - Present Traffic Signal Consultant 1982 - 1983 DKS Associates, Oakland, CA 1979 - 1982 City of San Luis Obispo, CA 1974 - 1979 City of Chicago, IL 1972 - 1974 Consulting 1968 - 1972 Cook County Highway Department, Chicago, IL 1967..- 1968 DeLeuw Cather E Company, San Francisco, CA EDUCATION The Institute of Design (Illinois Institute of Technology) Northeastern Illinois University, B.O.G. Program The Traffic Institute, Northwestern University (Traffic Signal Workshop) University of California, Institute of Transportation E Traffic Engineering (Mass Transit Planning and Fundamentals of Traffic Engineering) National Highway Institute, U.S. Department of Transportation, FHWA (Management of Traffic Control Systems) SOCIETIES Institute of Transportation Engineers (Member) Committee Member - Technical Council I.T.E. OTHER ACTIVITIES Served as Commissioner and Deputy Chairman on the City of Pacifica, California Transportation Commission. References will be provided upon request. KEITH B. HIGGINS AINC. Civil and Traffic Engineers - T r IT �I Gilroy Office San Luis Obispo Office P.O. Box 628 P.O. Box 5207 Gilroy, California 95020 Salinas Phone San Luis Obispo, California 9340 (408) 848-3122 (408) 455-1477 (805) 543-5164 1 Introduction . Keith B. Higgins and Associates, Inc., began _ as a sole proprietorship in 1982 to provide traf- fic and civil engineering services to the greater ' Monterey Bay Area and its vicinity. We offer a range of traffic and transportation planning and engineering services from traffic counts to a wide '` } variety of planning and design functions for pro- _ ' jects of virtually any size. Civil engineering ser- vices are also offered primarily to augment our traffic engineering functions. ._,, Our policy is to provide these services on a AAa timely, cost effective basis. We also maintain a �-"°" policy of high integrity and professionalism. Key Personnel Keith B. Higgins is President of the firm. He is a registered Civil and Traffic Engineer in Califor- nia. His background in engineering began in 1975 and includes traffic and transportation planning, design of traffic control devices and geometric design of streets and highways. His experience in- cludes general civil engineering as well, including the design of drainage sytems and subdivisions. He is involved in an extensive amount of transportation related community affiliations throughout the Central Coast area including chairing the Safety and Research Committee of the North Monterey County Mothers and Highway 101 Bypass Committee. He is also the chairman of the Salinas Area Chamber of Commerce Transportation Committee. In addition, he has participated in other com- munity organizations involved with planning of the transportation system in North Monterey Coun- ty including the North Monterey County Trails Committee, and the Committee Appealing for Road Safety which is lobbying for improvements on Highway 156. He also participates in technical com- mittees for the Institute of Transportation Engineers. The technical staff has a wide range of experience in general civil engineering, traffic engineering, transportation planning and municipal engineering. Support staff includes draftpersons,.tmffic count technicians and secretaries. Automated traffic count equipment, word and data processing equipment are used extensively for project execution. Professional Services Keith B. Higgins & Associates, Inc., offers a wide range of civil and traffic engineering services including the following: Access & Circulation Studies Permits & Project Representation Bicycle & Pedestrian Facilities Site Selection & Planning Comprehensive Transport Studies Speed Studies Energy & Air Quality Analysis Traffic Control Design & Planning Expert Testimony Traffic Control for Special Events Feasibility Studies Traffic Count Programs P 0 Geometric Highway Design Traffic Generation Studies Grading & Drainage Design Traffic Impact Studies Improvement Cost Allocation Traffic Safety Studies Inventory of Traffic Control Devices Traffic Signal Design Parking Studies Transit Planning Pavement Design Transportation Systems Management Representative P*Cts i General Civil —Grading and Drainage, Fort Ord, CA Engineering Highway and Intersection Improvement Plans, Monterey County, CA Subdivision Design, Monterey County, CA Water Main Extension, Santa Cruz, CA Parking Studies —Mixed Land Use Parking Study, Santa Cruz, CA Motel Parking Plan, Santa Cruz County, CA Parking Accumulation Study, Salinas, CA Planning Studies —Carmel Valley Master Plan, Monterey County, CA w Hi h a g y 68 Corridor Study, Monterey County, CA Sand City Coastal Zone, Sand City, CA Traffic Generation Analysis, Salinas, CA Safety Studies —Driveway Access Analysis, Santa Cruz County, CA Driveway Entrance Safety Study, Monterey County, CA Guardrail Design, Monterey County, CA Traffic Analysis —Morro Bay Hotel, Morro Bay, CA Circulation Study, Salinas, CA Circulation Study, Santa Cruz, CA Traffic Impact —Boronda Neighborhood Improvement Plan, Salinas, CA Studies Industrial Annexation, Gilroy, CA Landmark Industrial Park, Watsonville, CA Salinas Northeast Area Plan, Salinas, CA Traffic Operations —Intersection Improvement Plans, Monterey County, CA Project Access Review, Hollister, CA Traffic Count Program, Monterey County, CA Traffic Signal Design, Morgan Hill, CA Transit Studies —Bus Safety Study, Santa Cruz County, CA Bus Systems Design, San Luis Obispo County, CA Pedestrian Safety Warrant Study, Hollister, CA �9L?� 4 NX, ac N.�?-+—v �,,� - � � � .. _ �,, x`3.9 ,, �`'f"�� y� �, >,�d• f + , � : ?, sr �+ Y, •. $ w 1 v x iii ••� `. 00 r,_li 'ga� � �+c.;Z ,f'•,,,.r ' -ar.,». 'p*�„, .?"C yizz x �+ .a 7 f-F.. :•'0.,, ��"-� _40--a- -1116 '`+:^ r a } , .f`. * �, tsr w f► Acr* `1 b � .a�` 7� s �• .; R ��Qfrt. � fir'?.., � "rfi,.a -� ^'**����`. Representative Clients Governmental Architects, Agencies as Engineers Clients Land Developers and Planners Fort Ord Nader Agha Augustine Acuna Gilroy B & A Partners Associated Professions, Inc. Hollister Bollenbacher & Kelton Belli-Christensen King City Gerald G. Byrne Callander Associates Monterey California Employment Davenport & Hawley MontereyCount Development Department YDavis, Jacoubowsky, Housing Authority Carmel Rancho Post Office Hawkins & Associates Morgan Hill Property Owners' Association Robert L. DeWitt & Associates Salinas Unified High School Adeline DiLorenzo William Dryden District Dividend Development Co. Denise Duffy & Associates Sand City Eversull Development Environmental Management Watsonville Finegan & Cling, Attorneys Consultants Four West Holdings Environmental Science Don Fultz Associates Additional Gemtel/EGS Metro William Farrell& Associates Governmental Harrod Homes Foodpro International Jurisdictions Health Dimensions, Inc. Gabilan Consulting Where Work Heritage Development Garcia & Henry Performed Home Federal Savings Phoenix Resources, Inc. Integrated Land Services John Gilchrist & Associates Nick Iuliano Enterprises Hanna & Brunetti AtascadeArroyo Grande KTW Properties Dennis A. Hodgin Capitola Kaiser Permanente Holewinski & Blevens Carmela Kehoe Construction Co. George Kuska & Associates Carmel-By-The-Sea Dennis Keith Ted LaFleur, Inc. Del Rey Oaks Lester, Roach & Gardiner McCarthy & Associates Gilroy King City Lobue Enterprises Merriam & Fraser Motel 6 MH Engineering Marina Ra}mond G. Novelli & Mid Coast Engineers Monterey County Associates Paul Mrozinski Morro Bay Olympia Plaza Shopping Center Ray Parks Oxnard Orchard Supply Hardware Lee Phillips Pacific Grove Phoenix Resources Planning Analysis & Paso Robles Piini Realty Development Philadelphia, PA Raisch Industrial Builders Wade Reese Pismo Beach Safeway Stores Richard Rhodes San Benito County Salinas Christian School Ruth & Going San Joaquin County Salinas Industrial Park Assoc. San Benito Engineering San Jose Seagate Technology Sandis, Humber & Associaics San Juan Bautista Shaw Development Larry Seeman Associates Santa Cruz Alan Simpkins Robert Strong Santa Cruz County Sports Car Association Gene Takigawa Santa Cruz Harbor District of the Monterey Peninsula Terra Sol, Ltd. Santee, San Diego County Starcon Corporation Tunstall Engineering Scotts Valley Termicold Corporation Donald Wald & Associates Seaside Western Realty Investments Whitson Engineers Soledad Woodman Development Wray Engineering A/&v%lr NORTH COAST ENGINEERING, INC. /11`01� Civil Engineering - Land Surveying - Project Development November 7, 1988 City of Atascadero Public Works Department Paul Sensibaugh, Director of Public Works P.O. Box 747 Atascadero, CA 93423 RE: PROPOSAL FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES-TRAFFIC SIGNAL DESIGN, INTERSECTION OF EL CAMINO REAL & SANTA ROSA STREET Dear Mr. Sensibaugh: According to your request dated October 4, 1988, we have prepared this estimate for engineering services for the above referenced project. The scope of services is based on your request for proposal and on the normal scope of services for this type of project. The anticipated services and estimated fees are as follows: I. PRELIMINARY DESIGN SERVICES A. Intersection layout concepts/geometric review B. Utility location review and preliminary utility contacts C. Research at Public Agency for existing maps and traffic data D. Topographic survey of intersection E. Analyze signal warrants based on existing traffic F. Determine estimated traffic generation within 1/2 mile of intersection, based on existing zoning projected for year 2000 G. Coordination/review with City TOTAL PRELIMINARY DESIGN PHASE ESTIMATE $3,525. 00 II. DESIGN PHASE SERVICES A. Prepare preliminary traffic signal plan/utility drawing 20 scale B. Contact utility companies with draft plan, obtain comments C. Project coordination with City, weekly meeting with staff, attend one City Council meeting D. Final design and drafting of signal plan g E. Prepare Cost Estimate F. Prepare contract documents TOTAL DESIGN PHASE ESTIMATE $7,642.00 LUMP SUM, NOT TO EXCEED COST: $11, 167 .00 1 715 24th Street,Suite 0 Paso Robles CA 93446 (805) 239-3127 • ! III. CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES A. Construction layout 1. Placement of boxes, poles & detectors B. Construction Observation/Engineering Services C. Suggested signal timing and controller input _ D. Prepare Record Drawings TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PHASE ESTIMATE $5,400.00 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS REPRODUCTION INCLUDED IN PROPOSAL: NOT INCLUDED IN PROPOSAL: Fifteen copies of plans and -Storm drain design or contract documents, one rep- modifications producible copy of plans. -Street plan redesign for geometric changes The project manager will be John McCarthy, Vice President of North Coast Engineering. Mr. McCarthy is a registered Traffic Engineer in California and has had extensive experience in signal design and traffic operations. Mr. McCarthy had previously been employed by the City of Riverside as the Assistant City Traffic Engineer. For your information, We estimate the signal warrants and year 2000 traffic generation data requested to be $2, 600 of the pre- liminary design services amount. Our construction phase services are offered on an hourly basis in accordance with the attached fee schedule. If additional services are desired we would be glad to update our estimate to include them. We would be pre- pared to start work on this project within two weeks of authori- zation and estimate 12 weeks to design completion. Thank you for this opportunity to be of service. Respectful rs, John R. McCarthy, P.E. Vicejresiden .RM:lmv Enclosure: Steven J. Sylvester's John R. McCarthy's resume's North Coast Engineering Fee Schedule North Coast Engineering Brochure CITYATAS.PRO 2 JOHN R. MC CARTHY, P.E. EDUCATION: B.S. Transportation Engineering California Polytechnic State University M.S. Civil Engineering Purdue University, Indiana REGISTRATION: Civil Engineer in California Traffic Engineer in California SUMMARY: Mr. McCarthy has 10 years experience in the fields of traffic engineering, civil engineering and public works. He has a broad range of exper- ience in municipal public works projects invol- ving water, waste water, street and traffic im- provements and has been involved with design and construction of numerous residential and commer- cial projects. Additionally, Mr. McCarthy has worked in the public sector and has established good working relationships with local government agencies. EXPERIENCE NORTH COAST ENGINEERING, INC. Mr. McCarthy's responsibilities have been in the design and planning of various projects ranging in scope from small parking lots to large residential subdivisions and commercial projects. As project engineer, his duties have included coordination with clients, management of overall projects goals, design and review functions. He has been involved with a wide range of civil engineering projects including hydrologic analysis of streams and creeks, stormwater detention basin design, road design, water and wastewater system layout, grading plan design and traffic signal design and inspection. Mr. McCarthy has been involved with a number of projects at the conceptual design phase, providing the client with project de- sign alternatives to achieve specific goals. 1 0 i • CITY OF PASO ROBLES, CALIFORNIA As the City Manager, Mr. McCarthy served as the Chief Executive Officer for a growing population of 12,000 with a budget of 6.5 million dollars. Mr McCarthy was responsible for managing a $1 million water system improvement program and was involved with the financing and design of a $6 million bridge project. He established the first Capital Improvement Program for the City as well as a computerized records management system. During this time, Mr. McCarthy also functioned as City Engineer in one of the fastest growing cities in California. CITY OF PASO ROBLES, CALIFORNIA Mr. McCarthy was the Director of Municipal Services and City Engineer responsible for the administration of seven divisions, including sewer and water, with an annual budget in excess of $1 . million. He developed programs to prioritize expenditure of funds for street maintenance and traffic signal installation. Mr McCarthy was the responsible engineer on numerous assessment districts for sewer, water, streets and parking lots. As City Engineer he reviewed and inspected over thirty major subdivisions within the City both residential and commercial. He supervised and designed significant improvements to the sewer, water, storm drain, and traffic circulation systems. CITY OF RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA As the Assistant City Traffic Engineer Mr. McCarthy was respon- sible for the activities of the Traffic Division of the Public works Department. He worked on OTS grant projects, traffic signal layout and design, channelization, striping, speed, volume & parking studies. He also worked with a number of dev- elopers on large commercial shopping center projects. CITY OF CORONA, CALIFORNIA In the Engineering Division, Mr. McCarthy served as plan check and design engineering for subdivisions and city projects. His work involved survey and design of street traffic engineering improvements. He performed speed, volume, and other various traffic studies. 2 STEVEN J. SYLVESTER PRESIDENT, NORTH COAST ENGINEERING, INC. EDUCATION: B.S. , Transportation Engineering California Polytechnic State University REGISTRATION: Civil Engineer in California SUMMARY: Mr. Sylvester has 12 years experience in the fields of civil engineering, land surveying, construction management, traffic engineering, and fire protection engineering. He has been an engineering manager for various private development and public works pro- jects. He has provided contract administration and construction observation services on numerous pro- jects. EXPERIENCE: NORTH COAST ENGINEERING, INC. (SINCE 1979) As president and founder of North Coast Engineering, Mr. Sylves- ter's has supervised the design and development of a wide variety of both large and small scale public works and private develop- ment projects. As an engineering consultant to several public ' n central Sylvester has been responsi- ble i California,, Mr. onsi- y p ble for the planning, design, contract administration, surveying, and construction observation of various public improvements. These have included street improvements, water supply, transmis- sion and distribution facilities, sewage collection, transmission and pumping facilities, and other various improvements. Mr. Sylvester has provided engineering services for private de- velopments ranging from single family residential projects to multi-area commercial, industrial and residential subdivision - development projects. Services have included boundary and con- struction surveying, preparation of grading, drainage, erosion control and public improvement plans, and project management. Other services have included the preparation of traffic studies and feasibility analysis of various projects. JAMES M. MONTGOMERY, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Mr. Sylvester was a project engineer and construction inspector on a $4, 500, 000 major water production and distribution system improvement project and on a four mile long 12" diameter outfall sewer. His responsibilities included inspection as well as ad- ministrative duties. 1 COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA, ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT In the Hydraulics Planning and Design Division, Mr. Sylvester served as project coordinator for Clean Water Grants Projects. Duties included design engineering review, financial planning, administrative functions, and overall project control. Other functions within this division included preliminary engineering design and construction cost estimations for local water trans- mission facilities for the Coastal Branch of the California Aqueduct; assessment engineering; and project engineering and design of various water and wastewater facilities. In the Survey Division, Mr. Sylvester served as a reviewer of subdivision improvement plans, records of survey, parcel maps and subdivision maps for legal and technical correctness. FACTORY MUTUAL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATION, SAN FRANCISCO Mr. Sylvester served as a field engineer involved in the inspec- tion and evaluation of private industries for fire, explosion, and related hazards. This work included the inspection of new and existing water pipe installation and supply systems. Job functions included the analysis of the ability of public and private water system to supply required fire flow and duration for specific application; water system reliability analysis; analysis and design of fire protection system; establishment of plant emergency organizations and fire protection facility moni- toring programs; loss analysi.s; and design of theft protection systems. 2 • • A 10%Aff NORTH COAST ENGINEERING, INC 11V9� Civil Engineering - Land Surveying - Project Development FE E SCHEDULE June 1, 1988 CLASSIFICATION HOURLY RATE Principal Engineer $60. 00 Registered Civil Engineer $50.00 O Registered Traffic Engineer $50. 00 F F Registered tere g d Land Surve o I y r $40.00 C Associate Engineer $37. 00 E Senior Engineering Technician $30. 00 Engineering Technician $25. 00 Secretarial/Clerical $20. 00 CAD System and Operator $45. 00 Resident Engineer $45. 00 F I Construction Inspector $30.00 E L Two-Man Survey Crew $85. 00 D Three-Man Survey Crew $105. 00 REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 1. Actual cost of long distance telephone calls, express charges, postage, and outside reproduction. 2. Cost + 15% for outside professional consultants required for the work. 3. In house reproduction and .telecommunications costs as follows: Blueprints . 18/Sq.Ft. Sepia Mylar 1.50/Sq.Ft. Sepia .75/Sq.Ft. Photocopies . 15 each Telecopy (FAX) : Transmit $2. 00/Sheet 71S 7Ath Ctront C,,;.., !1 a_ D-t v— �A n- C /Onr% s e _ .t 777, t:. el f— J, 7.2 •ern - �L ?.+Tv�'a0` � �-..fes' .'�8+' Y-a-sik� 4.- � ,•... .. i t - id{Y'.-���''Y,T+ '%•S I�RZ �,S-3YQ �y Jit j ���lL � d:_�" i - r, — 1 Y _ v _ r- J N.0RVER! A EN.C'INE RING IN�C.� / s g C►�Eils ngineering •«Laid Surveying -;Probe Qevelopmen J.`y' ��� M� �Y'-'1..��, �y •�rQi�,�,.<y; S -1 - •4 "3p Y ;.d i {y.l' k'n NORTH COAST ENGINEERING, INC • COMMITTED TO EXCELLENCE IN QUALITY AND SERVICE Background North Coast Engineering, Inc. (NCE) was founded in 1979 in Cambria, California to provide civil en- gineering and land surveying services for the northern coastal area of San Luis Obispo County. After years of steady, well managed growth our services are now provided throughout Central California. To facilitate our expanded service area, our second office was opened in Paso Robles in 1985. NCE is a multidisciplined group of civil engineers, surveyors, land planners, and technical and clerical sup- port staff, who are dedicated to these goals: 1) to pro- vide the highest quality of professional service; 2) to provide well-conceived, cost effective engineering and surveying services; and 3) to optimize utilization of technological advances in the engineering and sur- CivilEng i n eeri n g veying fields. Services Our services are provided for a wide variety of pri- vate development and public works projects. Private NCE provides comprehensive civil engineering ser- developments range from single residential units to vices from initial site selection to filing the Notice of large scale commercial and residential developments. Completion. We can provide preliminary planning, de- Public works projects include water and wastewater sign, and cost estimates for various types of residential; systems, storm drainage, master planning, and com- commercial, and public works improvements. We can plete project management. Large or small, all projects provide complete project feasibility studies, and assist receive the same attention to detail and level of service you with project scheduling. Complete preparation of that our reputation is built on. development application packages, including tentative In the field or in the office, our staff is com- parcel and tract maps, is offered. plimented by the latest in technological equipment. At the design phase of your project, our services Through electronic automation of data collection and will provide the best design tailored to your needs and processing, we are able to spend more time where it requirements. For commercial and residential projects, provide complete counts: developing innovations in design to provide we P eco p ete grading and drainage plans, the most cost effective, reliable solutions to your en- street and utility improvment plans, site improvement gineering and surveying needs. plans, water and sewer system design and analysis, and project coordination. For subdivision projects, final parcel and tract maps and condominium plans are pre- pared and NCE coordinates their filing and recording. V» Other services include complete Assessment District En- �' ,�3 • ��� gineering, preparation of contract documents and spe- cifications and master planning for water, sewer and iS storm drain systems. We also prepare final project cost estimates and assist in all phases of pre-construction h r activities. r+s t k x NCE offers a variety of construction phase services to assist you in the timely and cost-effective comple- _ 1 -' ..; tion of your project. Assistance with bidding, contract award and administration, and construction scheduling ' � +*.,��. Y,� IIFIIFNIININI a can be provided. Construction observation and en- gineering is available to help control the quality and in- `t5 r �� tegrity of your project. NCE can prepare record draw- ings of the completed project and assist you with filing all construction documents. Our in house computer capabilities include word processing, database management, spreadsheet analy- sis, coordinate geometry and automated plotting for site and improvement designs (CADD), earthwork de- sign, hydrologic and hydraulic analysis, and sewer and water system modeling. Land Surveying Services NCE has been a pioneer in the development of an - automated electronic field survey system designed to � ^^ maximize productivity and minimize measurement error. Working with equipment and software manufac- turers, we have developed a system that electronically integrates all field and office aspects of land surveying. In the field, an electronic "total station", utilizing an infrared laser, performs survey measurements which are automatically recorded by an electronic data collec- tor/field computer. No manual data entry is required, and automatic calculations are performed to verify sur- vey data prior to leaving the site. In the office, data collected in the field is electro- nically transferred to the NCE computer system, where further data reduction and computer-aided design op- Public Works Projects erations are performed. Final maps and plans are then Works created on an automated pen plotter. NCE has completed a variety of public works plan- On projects involving construction staking, our sys ning, design and construction projects. We have a tem is utilized to calculate, plot and check the location reputation for completing these projects in a timely of all desired facilities. Calculated field positions are and cost effective manner. We offer a comprehensive electronically transferred to the electronic data collec range of services including preliminary engineering re- tor, which is then used in the field to control the op- ports and feasibility studies, preparation of final con- eration of the total station for laying out and recording struction plans, specifications and bid documents, and the position of the construction stakes. complete construction management services. We also NCE provides comprehensive land surveying ser- provide master planning for water, wastewater, and vices. We are experts in all phases of boundary deter- storm drain systems. minations and lot surveys. We provide topographic We are well qualified in the planning and design mapping for small and medium size projects; on larger of water distribution and storage systems, water trans- projects we provide ground control for aerial mapping. mission facilities, wastewater collection, transmission, We provide complete subdivision and construction treatment and disposal facilities, street and highway surveying services, including construction stake-out, systems, and stormwater collection, transmission and boundary corner monumentation, and surveys of com- disposal facilities. pleted improvements to aid in preparing record draw- NCE construction phase services include assisting ings. We also perform surveys of ranches and govern- you with advertising, receiving, and evaluating bid pro- ment lands, agricultural surreys, and ALTA surveys. posals; making bid award recommendations; admin- istering the construction contract, including processing pay estimates and change orders; providing full time on site construction observation to maintain the high- est level of quality control; project scheduling; main- taining and preparing accurate record drawings of the completed project; providing all necessary construction surveying; coordinating all sub-consultants on the pro- - ject; and assisting you with the filing of the final con- struction completion documents. -74 Office Locations d PASO ROBLES: `a,rYa:ci _ 715 24th St., Ste. O Paso Robles,CA 93446 . CAMBRIA: 4036 BURTON DRIVE ? P.O. BOX 1357 p CAMBRIA, CA 93428 (805) 927-8651 Pub.by Jack Darmody,Cambria,CA +•.: _• F i s`,? T-'yam, ,yap s a. `Y z Jy �. ;W Y .{ ir A `c 'a� "x r 3 Z 3,TM y,= ,�':£-s k '. " � ?• �, �� "mowk%` -'���i'�� } +<"� -•�a,�` a .k`a.F �.x`,� �t�`,x}�``s��"r. '�,�,<�"S?.�'"��u�� �s.•r ,�'-i 1'� S� 3 r : .£ �" +. qr.�•'�"t-"tis�#s'� is �`�r` 'i�.``k' 4 _ � s ����� ,�� '`:� -2 •ria x '%5 �•`k �_ i t �v�[ L �'t'�.�.��M ,� �� �: s�Tr �a� _ �. a ar� «d,�-"S-•�, ^�,: ext �.�.;A ,r ,�V ��'�et �f�� _� � r�c�� r �-a,�,.. * s;�•�•�"�'r,�'�r` 'eyv�' ,,,� X� � *a-y �" ,� .� . • f �.c 3" x.v � '�,�%ate � �.., �.��`�� t"@���., pit a- :fig .� }, r M rj q 4 r11`jt° Jl- 4 f Y} •, y j;r �S#j(a -x'Y t 3 Lir}. i I1S F Y,t1', 0`i� S� r` t t:f f r :iS t� r..'� r - a c t �si a t as tf yr Y3,., 't• .# r P. yr -i j. �•' f _. = r; a3�. of a:; a` �3j,t ,{ {uFt�3i` # ! ; I fl '�.1,`/ft f tt 'ti., ;-•�Sa f `df rf i i f t�<=•y �fF+F. J/int t-�'� , ``�-. j�aut...t ��;,, t,i��5, p t`/� ! b3� 3f�'!C r.� � - � .. Yr dd ,v` !,dj. �tS ,/ § '' :i 2 `�` '$° R w'�-...� 51'• `r * c P I +,t -1 . J;fYt� #.��j ,_ ;i�4:�. P rd! t' T r =•Y.}§kYwr tr rr 7 f YA K s yt' k t s t r s 3 ,a y h J. F � i 4 F• t �.1N Si� -S }• <" I t �,.� .r � <. �. S"Nyy � 3 ��� sal •o 'v �. t tf� �[s� �j� !f !' •�" '}, __j � 1 y'- c-,r t ,t yi _ < ,i:-,. �, tr•; rt! '� # t .a-° F= � °`/ S + .. i; ! ,f x } x .a. 1k` l�,t t,, a�fc .r�;a� � a a _, j { � Z�t• 1� ✓:j �} � -'� S .i _ f y -7t•-i—r - -4•- r � .:y.- sz [ � s1 i t .yr, �,� 1 �._ '�'y,X 2-�� .� '.� i 'j� �j°3 iI � .� i A �k-r` C � +yi.Cdr y i ♦ t, _ % i Tentatty ancFlnaRarceanctTractMaps; L"otandBoundaturveys ,rtk SubdlwslornlmpxovemeniPlana TopographiMapslr t ; � - - `' Water and Sewer Systen StudlesraMM hn*, Consteuctio`rr�layout �• � ✓•�r�l a�� +n a .. �� h _: > y? { '- � ;r T, ="t't s a � r` < G adlnc, Pfan t _ it PaKced€Map anc Subdivlsion__Su veys R� ;� - i( � i♦ t . �r;Dra nage Stiudr and�Rtans Y :A§dcultura t"ul veys :a J' ,1 RiL ro ecL Mandrnen rA �• 1 9 't R3 n:66 vernmen lands ' ' r[Constru 1ortObser.�at�or p ALTAS'ucve'ysf "� = /�s�seSs�ritet i Di h t �1 of Su reys&, or A` rl 1 PF 4togrammetry r , �''ii' •, to AI k.F C4mp�sl � d l�D� ar�dtDraftln •'/'.' :�-"` rrLt r�.r : A } Sty._'ti�et-it t�l f 'Jt .r.. tt' {r 7si, r ,f,,�.k, •-"• - y �' T 1 r ! L ,� trt.F ti^ t: -site t. r•,,.t�,r t t-it v tta$ %c,,,, r�} 'vt Y Xrr ,(S�y- �, .Y.+�,. .�,� 2:�-i ? -,k-, i;:_ p 't ,d ..tt et FF. r .,� ,,+,:,��` 4 .•.,r e'� Sr�. 4r?`-t�` 's6f' �,' �Z.j +k.;�t zap rh +. , .t • M E M O R A N D U M TO: City Council November 22, 1988 VIA: Ray Windsor, City Manager FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Request for Lewis Avenue Bridge Fee Refunds BACKGROUND: With the November 8, 1988 approval of Resolution No. 100-88 revising the development fee schedule within the City, refunds are in order for previously paid Lewis Avenue Bridge fee contri- butions . By changing the formula for payment of the fee from the Business Improvement Association area to City-wide, the per square footage fee was reduced and refunds are in order for Dr. John Anderson (5903 East Mall) and Steven Yung (6080 E1 Camino Real) . • ACTION REQUESTED: Authorize staff to refund $2, 518. 54 to Dr. John Anderson and $2 , 601 . 00 to Steven Yung. HE :ps • . � i MEEYING G>=NDA 3 `� DATE TEM M Friends of the Library _ of Atascadero • n■l ■ ■ ■.�■ ! P.O. Box 561 ^••••• Atascadero, CA 93423 1918 ■ 1979 Oct. 16, 1988 Dear Mr. Windsor: I am :writing to you at the request of the Atascadero Friends of the Library Board. As you may know, the Atascadero Library, which was dedicated in May, 1988, was build jointly by the City of Atascadero and San Luis Obispo County, with Friends of the Atascadero Library participating. Q The responsibility for maintaining the library is now Qntirely the County' s under the direct supervision of Mr. Dale Perkins, County Library Director, and the indirect supervision of the County Board of Supervisors. Our present urgent problem concerns the number of days and hours the library is open for use by the library patrons. Under the present arrangement the library is open Tuesday and 'Wednsday from 10:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. ; on 'Thursday, Friday and Saturday the li- brary is open from 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. The library is closed on Monday. These hours were in :lace before the library moved to • new quarters. It was not satisfactory then. It is not at all satisfactory now. During the first four months the new library has been in operation, volume increased 50% as compared with the some time last year when the library was located in the Administra- tion Building. dotal increase of patrons is 98"6 and this does not include patrons who come with library cards obtained elsewhere in the system. We have had many requests for open hours on ;Monday, particularly from parents of school children, among others. I wish to point out that the Atascadero Library is, in fact a regional library. Templeton does not have a library at all. Creston and Santa Margarita each have a most inadequate library which is open only about 10 hours each week. Many of the resi- dents from these towns come to our library. As Chief Administrator of our city, we are asking you _`or your help in obtaining more liberal hours. :Sinc ely Yours, ---- Sarah Gronstrand enc: Chart shoeing increase in circulation and patronage June 1987 June 1988 Circulation80 4 9, 3 1 ,962 Added ratrons 163 577 • R.Q.* 825 920 -- "' July 1987 July 1988 Circulation 11 ,515 --1`7,9l7 (17,917) Added Patrons 246 381 R.Q. * 887 19052 August 87 August 88 Circulation 99909 15027 Added Patrons 254 375 R.Q.* 763 19048 Sept. 87 Sept. 88 Circulation 9754 132786 Added Patrons 190 355 R.Q. * 852 704 Circulation Total 4 mos. 1987 40,981 • Circulation Total 4 mos. 1988 61792 Increase - 50% Added Patrons 4 mos. 1987 853 Added patrons 4 mos. 1988 1688 Increase- 98% R.Q. * Total 4 mos. 1987 3327 R.Q.* Total 4 mos. 1988 3724 Increase 125`0 R.Q. *Q - Reader questisms directed to librarians • MEET IJy"AGENDA DATEITEM Ir &5850 TRAFFIC WAY • P.O. BOX 6075 • ATASCADER • ATASCADERO MUTUAL WATER COMPANY ESTABLISHED 1913 November 10, 1988 R E C E I Y E D NOV 14 1988 CITY MGR. City of Atascadero P. 0. Box 747 Atascadero, CA 93423 Attention: Mr. Ray Windsor, City Manager Re: Proposed Government Center Dear Mr. Windsor: You have asked us for the position of the Atascadero Mutual Water Company with regard to the question as to whether the Water Company will serve the property which is presently under consideration by the County of San Luis • Obispo for use as the North County Government Center. The Water Company understands that this property is located outside the designated boundaries of the Water Company. As such, for the Water Company to make a determin- ation as to whether to serve this property, the Water Company must engage in a very complicated and expensive process which includes dealing with various governmental entities, attorneys and engineers. The Water Company has a number of constraints in dealing with such an issue which include its obligations to properties which it now serves, and obligations to properties located within its boundaries which the Water Company has an obligation to serve upon development in the future. The Water Company understands that the County is considering the total of five sites, one of which is the site referred to above. The Water Company believes that it does not make economic or practical sense to deal with the issue of serving a property outside of its boundaries until it is known that the property in question is the first choice of the County. Consequently, the Water Company will not make any decision until the County makes its deter- mination first. truly yours Leroy R. Davis, President BOARD OF DIRECTORS c.c. - Sinsheimer, Schiebelhut & Baggett • a professional law corporation Ms. Debbie Hossli County Administrative 'Analyst