Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 050807 Special Meeting�J CITY OF A TA SCA DERO CITY COUNCIL "SPECIAL MEETING" AGENDA Tuesday, May 8, 2007 5:30 P.M. City Hall Council Chambers 6907 EI Camino Real Atascadero, California • ROLL CALL: Mayor Luna Mayor Pro Tem Brennler Council Member Beraud Council Member Clay Council Member O'Malley A. MANAGEMENT REPORTS: 1. Conditional Use Permit 2004-0137 Amendments / Zone Text Amendment ZCH 2006-0130 Fairfield Inn Hotel Health Care Services CT Text Amendment (9700 EI Camino Real) (Jacobson / Patel) ■ Description: Proposal for the construction of a Hotel at 9700 EI Camino Real. ■ Fiscal Impact: Revenue positive to the City due to the generation of transient occupancy tax. ■ Recommendations: Council: There are four actions before the City Council: 1) a revised Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared and circulated for review that encompasses all aspects of the proposed project, 2) the hotel and associated site modifications are included in the Conditional Use Permit amendment, 3) the proposed Zone Text Amendment, and 4) a corresponding Conditional Use Permit to allow the proposed health care services use at the project site. Since the projects cannot be segmented under CEQA, all items have been forwarded to the City Council for final review and approval. Planning Commission Recommends: Council: 1. Adopt Draft Resolution A certifying proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration 2007-0002 subject to Mitigation Monitoring; and, 2. Adopt Draft Resolution B approving the proposed amendment to Conditional Use Permit 2004-0137 (Master Plan of Development) allowing for the construction of an 80 -room hotel based on findings and subject to Conditions of Approval and Mitigation Monitoring; and, 3. Introduce for first reading, by title only, Draft Ordinance A approving Zone Change 2006-0130 amending the CT zoning code text to conditionally allow "health care services" based on findings; and, 4. Adopt Draft Resolution C recommending that the City Council approve the proposed amendment to Conditional Use Permit 2004-0137 (Master Plan of Development) allowing health care services to occupy 3,400 square -feet of tenant space in the office portion of the development, based on findings and subject to conditions of approval. [Community Development] B. ADJOURNMENT: Please note: Should anyone challenge any proposed development entitlement listed on this Agenda in court, that person may be limited to raising those issues addressed at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at or prior to this public hearing. Correspondence submitted at this public hearing will be distributed to the Council and available for review in the City Clerk's office. I, Shannon Sims, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Atascadero, declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing agenda for the May 8, 2007 Special Study Session of the Atascadero City Council was posted on May 2, 2007 at the Atascadero City Hall, 6907 EI Camino Real, Atascadero, CA 93422 and was available for public review in the Customer Service Center at that location. Signed this 2nd day of May, 2007 at tascadero, California. 1 Shannon Sims, Deputy City Clerk City of Atascadero 4 L� • • 11 Atascadero City Council ITEM NUMBER: SP A-1 DATE: 05/08/07 Staff Report - Community Development Department Conditional Use Permit 2004-0137 Amendments Zone Text Amendment ZCH 2006-0130 Fairfield Inn Hotel Health Care Services CT Text Amendment 9700 EI Camino Real (Jacobson / Patel) (Proposal for the construction of a Motel at 9700 El Camino Real.) RECOMMENDATIONS: • There are four actions before the City Council: 1) a revised Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared and circulated for review that encompasses all aspects of the proposed project, 2) the hotel and associated site modifications are included in the Conditional Use Permit amendment, 3) the proposed Zone Text Amendment, and 4) a corresponding Conditional Use Permit to allow the proposed health care services use at the project site. Since the projects cannot be segmented under CEQA, all items have been forwarded to the City Council for final review and approval. Planning Commission Recommends: Council: 1. Adopt Draft Resolution A certifying proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration 2007- 0002 subject to Mitigation Monitoring; and, 2. Adopt Draft Resolution B approving the proposed amendment to Conditional Use Permit 2004-0137 (Master Plan of Development) allowing for the construction of an 80 -room hotel based on findings and subject to Conditions of Approval and Mitigation Monitoring; and, 3. Introduce for first reading, by title only, Draft Ordinance A approving Zone Change 2006-0130 amending the CT zoning code text to conditionally allow "health care services" based on findings; and, • 3 4. Adopt Draft Resolution C recommending that the City Council approve the proposed • amendment to Conditional Use Permit 2004-0137 (Master Plan of Development) allowing health care services to occupy 3,400 square -feet of tenant space in the office portion of the development, based on findings and subject to conditions of approval. REPORT -IN -BRIEF: The proposed Amendment consists of a request to modify the approved Master Plan of �.�evelopment for an infill commercial development at 9700 EI Camino Real. The proposed project consists of an application for a Conditional Use Permit Amendment to modify a commercial development located on 1.7 acres within the Commercial Tourist Zone. The application also includes a Zone Text Amendment to the conditionally allowed uses within the Commercial Tourist Zone to allow health care services/medical offices. An additional Conditional Use Permit approval will permit medical offices to occupy 3,400 square -feet of the new office building. Two building sites are proposed for the site. Building 1, a 15,000 square -foot office building, is currently under construction. Medical offices are currently proposed to occupy this building. Building 2 is proposed to be an 80 room hotel totaling 51,740 square -feet. Twelve additional native trees are proposed for removal DISCUSSION: Situation and Facts: 1. Applicant / Representative 2. Project Address 3. General Plan Designation 4. Zoning District.- 5. istrict: 5. Site Area: 6. Existing Use.- 7. se: 7. Environmental Status 51 Ted Jacobson, 8055 Cristobal Avenue, Atascadero, CA 93422 JP Patel, 3600 EI Camino Real, Atascadero, CA 93422 9700 EI Camino Real, Atascadero, CA 93422 (San Luis Obispo County) APN 056-081-032 General Commercial (GC) Commercial Tourist (CT) 1.715 acres Office building under construction Mitigated Negative Declaration 2007-0002 • Background On April 17, 2007, the Planning Commission held a public hearing for the proposed project and zoning code amendment and recommended that the City Council approve the proposed project on a 6-1 vote, with the following modifications: Modified conditions of approval: 1. Deletion of conditions 19 and 21 related to improvements along East Frontage Road, During the Planning Commission Meeting, the applicant's traffic engineer expressed concerns related to the required striping of East Front Road to allow for a dedicated turn pocket into the hotel project site. The City Engineer agreed with the applicant's engineer stating that the estimated number of peak hour movements into the hotel site did not warrant the conditioned improvements. 2. Modification of Mitigation Measure 15.a.b.1 to cap applicant contribution to fair share mitigation of signalization of the Santa Rosa overpass, The applicant requested a maximum value of the required fair share mitigation • fees and a sunset on the requirement for fair share fees as no reimbursement map has been filed to date and the extent of the cost of the improvements is unknown. The City Engineer agreed that the fair share fees could be capped at $300,000 per signal and that all fair share fees would be refunded from 2 -years of payment date if no reimbursement map has been filed by that time. Currently, the West Front Village project is responsible for the installation of the signals and all related improvements to the overpass. To date, the developers of West Front Village have bonded for the estimated improvements and are pending Caltrans approval with only minor outstanding corrections. A subdivision improvement agreement has been signed and approved by the City Council allowing the developers of West Front Village 1.5 -years to complete the signal construction. 3. Require that the health care services use be alarmed for public safety based on the proximity of the hotel use (Condition 15), 4. Require two bike racks, one to be placed at the office building, and one to be placed at the hotel (Condition 16), and 5. Amended mitigation measures based on APCD recommendations • 9 r� Planning Commission directed staff to review the following items prior to City Council approval: 1. Staff provide recommendations to the City Council regarding the request by the applicant at the meeting to substitute cultured stone for the brick veneer. During the April 17, 2007 Planning Commission meeting, the applicant conveyed that he Marriot franchise had denied the elevations as proposed based on the brick veneer and requested that the brick veneer be substituted with stacked stone veneer at the request of the franchise. Staff has not had the opportunity to review revised elevations at this time. The applicant is working on exhibits for the City Council meeting. 2. Applicant provide additional information regarding the requested directional signage. During the April 17 Planning Commission meeting, the applicant requested additional directional signage that was not included on the submitted site plan. As the project is designed with two access locations off of two frontages, the directional signage will allow signage for each use along each road frontage. Staff is recommending that a condition be added to allow for two directional • signs, one at each access driveway location. 3. Staff provide recommendation to the City Council regarding the requested stucco texture modification. The applicant is requesting that the condition requiring smooth stucco finish or similar, such as a uniform sand finish, be clarified / modified to allow for a rough knock -down texture. Samples of the requested stucco texture were not available for review by the Planning Commission and the Commission withheld a recommendation on the stucco texture, requesting that staff make a recommendation to City Council. Staff is recommending a medium to heavy sand finish rather than a knock down stucco finish on the building. 4. Revised arborist report to reflect corrected information regarding number of tree removals. The arborist report presented to staff and the Planning Commission contained some errors related to the number of tree removals. There are 7 small native trees along the northern property boundary that were originally thought to be 100% impacted by utility trenching for the proposed hotel project. It was later determined that the trees are located on the adjacent property and will be impacted by the proposed project but will not require removal. • 0 • In addition, the arborist expressed serious concerns related to the construction impacts on the 60 inch live oak tree located along the East Front Road frontage. The arborist is recommending removal of the tree based on the degree of construction impacts. The hotel plans are designed to preserve this tree. The arborist does not believe that he tree will remain viable post construction and is recommending the tree be removed. The Planning Commission is not recommending that the tree be removed. Staff has included a number of conditions related to maintaining this tree as proposed by the applicant including collecting a mitigation deposit for the tree and redesign of the encroaching parking spaces. The updated arborist report includes additional discussion regarding this tree. • :7 Project Definition Surrounding Land Use and Setting: North: Commercial Professional South: Commercial Professional East: Residential Single-family West: Commercial Professional The project site is within the General Commercial General Plan land use designation and is zoned Commercial Tourist, which allows for the establishment of a commercial development in excess of 10,000 square feet with the approval of a Conditional Use Permit to establish a Master Plan of Development. The proposed project consists of an Amendment to a previously approved infill commercial/office development located on EI Camino Real adjacent to the existing Post Office. The revised Master Plan of Development includes an 80 -room hotel along the East Front Road frontage. The applicant is also requesting a number of modifications to the office building currently under construction and the immediate surrounding site. The applicant is also proposing a Zone Text Change to allow "health care services" as a conditionally allowed use in the Commercial Tourist Zone. Included in the proposed Amendment is a request to permit medical offices to occupy 3,400 square -feet of the office building currently under construction. 7 Zone Text Amendment The applicant is proposing a Zone Text Change to establish "Health Care Services" as a conditionally allowed use in the Commercial Tourist Zone. The request to establish medical offices within the proposed office/hotel development is being processed concurrently with this application. The Zone Text Amendment would have to be adopted by City Council for the use to be approved within the development. One of the actions before the City Council is a Conditional Use Permit to allow 3,400 square -feet of medical offices/health care services within the previously approved office portion of the project (Resolution C). Traffic Impacts The applicant has included the proposed health service use in the traffic analysis prepared by Steve Orosz. Based on the size of the requested use and an analysis of uses currently allowed within the development, the traffic engineer has determined that there will be no increased traffic due to the addition of the medical offices. • • 0 Master Plan of Development Amendment I Establishment of Health Care Services • Site Design The proposed site modification will allow for the construction of the proposed 80 -room hotel along East Front Road. The proposed hotel building has been located along the southern property line, adjacent to the existing Post Office. The Amendments and parking configurations allows for safe and efficient access through the site. The resulting site configuration has been reviewed by the Fire Department and meets all minimum code requirements. The proposed medical offices are required to comply with the current Building Code which includes requirements for covered canopies and accessible drop-off areas. There are certain Uniform Building Code exceptions provided for this code requirement. It has not yet been determined if the proposed office building would meet any of the allowed exceptions. Enforcement of the Building Code and any applicable exceptions will occur during building permit review and, should any exterior changes to the building need to occur due to the requested use, a condition has been included to allow staff level approval of the exterior modifications, if any, providing all improvements are consistent with the architectural style of the building (Resolution C, Condition 3). Landscaping: The applicant has worked with staff to provide landscaping around the proposed four- story hotel building. The layout of the proposed building and associated parking creates minimal areas for landscaping throughout the hotel portion of the site. For the hotel portion of the site, the landscaping is estimated to be at 10%-12% of the hotel site area. The applicant has worked with staff to increase landscape opportunities to the front of the proposed hotel and along the East Front Road frontage. In addition, the applicant has provided stamped and colored concrete at the building entrance and interlocking pavers throughout the project site. The applicant is proposing landscaping along the north, south, and west sides of the building. A landscaped planter strip is proposed between the street and the sidewalk adjacent to east Front Road. The proposed center parking areas also includes a pavered pathway and planter areas sized for larger shade trees. Columnar shaped deciduous trees are proposed for the planters adjacent to the building and adjacent to the post office property. Some of the selected trees do not meet the standard requirement for drought tolerant landscaping, however, based on the nature of the landscape areas provided, staff is recommending that the proposed landscape plan be approved as proposed. Staff has conditioned that larger tree be installed to ensure adequate screening and softening of the building (Resolution B, Condition 9). 0 Parking 118 parking spaces are currently proposed for the project site. Based on the addition of • all parking required for each individual use, 156 parking spaces are required. The Municipal Code allows for a reduction to the overall required parking by 10% and reduce the required parking for the most intensive use by an additional 75% based on a shared peak -hour parking scenario, resulting in a minimum of 83 spaces required. Planning Commission is recommending that eh City Council make the finding that the characteristics of a use or its immediate vicinity do not necessitate the number of parking spaces, type of design, or improvements required by this title and that reduced parking will be adequate to accommodate on the site all parking needs generated by the use. The applicant has submitted a parking and traffic analysis prepared by Steve Orosz that analyzes all proposed uses for the site and assumes shared parking among all tenants. The study determined that, at peak parking hours, assuming 100% occupancy of the hotel, a maximum of 95 would be used. The proposed amended site design provides 118 parking spaces, leaving an excess of 23 spaces during peak parking demand as analyzed by the applicant's parking and traffic consultant. Traffic The Traffic and Parking Analysis prepared by Steve Orosz analyzed impacts from the proposed development on the surrounding infrastructure. Based on this analysis, the • study recommends that the project implement the following mitigation measure. Mitigation Measure 15. a. b. 1: Required fair share contributions to the Santa Rosa / 101 interchange improvements (signal and associated improvements) for the hotel portion of the proposed project shall be as follows: a. E. Front Street / NB 101 On -Ramp Intersection: 17.5% b. W. Front Street/ SB 101 On -Ramp Intersection: 9.7% Fees due shall be required prior to, or currently with, issuance of building permits for the proposed hotel development. Impacts from the proposed office complex are anticipated in the General Plan and no additional fair share payments will be required for the addition of medical office uses. The Planning Commission has recommended that this condition be modified as discussed in the background section at the beginning of this report. Architecture, Materials Color The proposed hotel is designed as a four story building with architectural detailing that includes brick accents wrapping the exterior of the building along the first and second stories, awnings located above key accent windows, horizontal banding, darker earth - toned colors, eave bracketing, and trellis accents along East Front Road. A porte 10 C� cochere is included along the front elevation facing the parking lot. This element • includes brick veneer columns and heavy timber elements throughout the roof structure. The applicant is requesting that stacked stone veneer be substituted for the proposed brick. Staff has included a discussion of this request in the beginning of this report for your review and consideration. • Signage is proposed on all four elevations. Signs facing the parking lot and Post Office measure 98 square -feet. Signage facing East Front Road and the office building measure 52 square -feet. Based on the height of the signage and scale of the building, the proposed signage is appropriately sized and architecturally compatible with the proposed elevations. The applicant is also proposing a monument sign located at the east Front Road entrance. The proposed monument sign is approximately 30 square -feet. The maximum allowed area for a monument sign is 60 square -feet. The requested sign is under the maximum allowed by code. A condition has been included that the sign design be modified to be consistent with the building architecture (Resolution B, Condition 12). Height The proposed hotel reaches a maximum height of 56 -feet 3.5 -inches. The maximum height allowed without Planning Commission approval is 35 -feet within a Commercial Zone. The applicant presented renderings of the building at the Planning Commission meeting and the Planning Commission is recommending that the building be approved as proposed. 11 Native Tree Mitigation/Preservation • Five additional native tree removals will be required based on the revised site plan. The tree mitigation chart for the requested trees is shown below. One of the trees (tree #9 — 47"LO), was previously approved for removal with the original CUP application Evergreen Native Trees (inches) Deciduous Native Trees (inches) Totals dbh notes dbh notes 1 2 3 8 17 -inches LO 9 47 -inches LO 10 6 -inches TOY 11 70 -inches LO 12 39 -inches LO 20 Total 179 -inches Total 0 -inches 179 -inches Mitigation Requirement req'd tree replacements: 60 five gal trees . req'd tree replacements: 0 five gal trees 60 five gal trees Tree Fund Payment: $ 2,983.33 Tree Fund Payment: $ $ 2,983.33 • A condition of approval has been included requiring that the applicant pay mitigation fees into the Tree Replacement Fund or provide equivalent re -plantings on site, as required by the Atascadero Native Tree Ordinance (Resolution B, Condition 10). One native tree will remain and is incorporated into the revised site design. The 60" live oak along the East Front Road frontage will be incorporated into a planter area adjacent to 4 parking spaces. The arborist recommends removal of the tree as the additional stress due to construction will greatly reduce the possibility of survival. If the tree is conditioned to be saved, the Arborist Report recommends eliminating the 4 parking spaces to ensure the health of the tree. Staff does not recommend reducing the parking beyond what is requested at this time. The arborist has stated that the parking spaces could remain with certain conditions related to their construction including maintaining the spaces at current grade and utilizing gravel instead of paving beneath the dripline. Staff has concerns about the use of loose gravel in a commercial project, thus staff has conditioned that he applicant utilize turf block for the four parking spaces and that no excavation beneath existing grade occur without approval for the project arborist (Resolution B, Condition 8). 12 C7 • • Modifications to the Office Building and Site Improvements The applicant is requesting the following modifications to the office building and adjacent site improvements: 1. Modification of condition requiring smoother stucco texture As currently conditioned, the office building is required to utilize a smooth stucco texture or similar light sand finish. The conditioned texture was included in the architect's plans and compliments the detailing of the Mediterranean Architectural Style. hla applicant is proposing a rougher knock -down texture which is contrary to the previous project approval. If the City Council wishes to amend the condition for rough, knock -down stucco texture, a condition should be added to Resolution B. A discussion of Planning Commission's recommendation on this item is included at the beginning of the staff report. Due to the grade difference between the sidewalk and the parking lot, the applicant is requesting approval of a retaining wall along the EI Camino Real frontage. The existing approved planter area is 8 -feet wide. While final grading plans have not been submitted at this time, the applicant estimates the wall to be approximately 4 -feet tall. Planning Commission is recommending that the City Council approve this Amendment with conditions that the wall be stucco to match the office building and that the street trees remain as previously approved with the addition of larger shrubs and vines to the landscape planter (Resolution B, Condition 14). 13 General Plan Consistency The proposed project is consistent with the following General Plan Land Use Element Policies: Goal LOC 3. Transform the existing El Camino Real "strip" into a distinctive, attractive and efficient commercial, office and industrial park area which can provide for the long- term economic viability of the community. Land Use Program 1.1.7: "Within the Urban Core encourage infill development or revitalization or reuse of land already committed to urban development where utilities and public services exist. Land Use Policy 2.1: "Ensure that new development is compatible with existing and surrounding neighborhoods". Goal LOC 13. Provide for a sound economic base to sustain the City's unique character by establishing a range of employment and business opportunities and generate sufficient revenue to support adequate levels of public services, and environmental, social and educational quality. Policy 13.3.1: Promote tourism and travel industries Policy 13.3.2: Encourage hotel, conference, and resort development and protect • potential sites from conversion to other uses Policy 13.3.3: Update and maintain the Zoning Ordinance to allow additional uses in the Tourist Commercial zoning district The Planning Commission has found that the proposed hotel project and expanded use within the CT Zoning designation is consistent with the goals and policies of the Land Use Element. The project will provide 15,000 square feet of commercial space and an 80 -room hotel located adjacent to Highway 101 and adjacent to the EI Camino Real corridor. As conditioned, the project incorporates a variety of materials and design features that are consistent with the character of Atascadero. All traffic impacts will be mitigated based on the recommendations of the traffic engineer and all environmental impacts have been reviewed and are included in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration. Findings Zone Text Change 1. The zone change is consistent with General Plan policies and all other applicable ordinances and policies of the City. 0 14 2. Amendment of the zoning ordinance will provide for the orderly and efficient use of lands where such development standards are applicable. 3. The zone change will not, in itself, result in significant environmental impacts. Conditional Use Permit Two Conditional Use Permit requests are before the City Council. The findings have been broken into two sections to address each request individually. Hotel / Master Plan of Development Amendment: proposed project or use is consistent with the General Plan and the City's Appearance Review Manual. Staff Comment: The proposed hotel development is consistent with the General Plan as noted above and is consistent with the Appearance review manual, incorporating dark earth toned colors and architectural features consistent with the Character of Atascadero. 2. The proposed project or use satisfies all applicable provisions of the Title (Zoning. Ordinance) including the Planned Development Ordinance. Staff Comment: As conditioned, the project satisfies all conditional use permit and • zoning code provisions for a commercial development. 3. The establishment, and subsequent operation or conduct of the use will not, because of the circumstances and conditions applied in the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of the general public or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the use, or be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity of the use. Staff Comment: The proposed commercial development will not be detrimental to the general public or working persons health, safety, or welfare. 4. That the proposed project or use will not be inconsistent with the character or the immediate neighborhood or contrary to its orderly development. Staff Comment: The project has been designed to enhance the appearance along East Front Road and the Highway 101 corridor with high quality architecture. A larger scale commercial development is compatible with existing development along EI Camino Real and is an appropriate use for the 101 corridor. 5. That the proposed use or project will not generate a volume of traffic beyond the safe capacity of all roads providing access to the project, either existing or to be improved in conjunction with the project, or beyond the normal traffic volume of the 15 surrounding neighborhood that would result from full development in accordance with the Land Use Element. Staff Comment: The proposed project and use is consistent with the traffic projections and road improvements anticipated within the General Plan. The project has been conditioned to pay their fair share of traffic related improvements to the Santa Rosa / 101 interchange. Specifically, the project will contribute to signal improvements to the on- and off -ramps adjacent to the Santa Rosa overpass. Establishment of 3,400 square -feet of "health care services": 1. The proposed project or use is consistent with the General Plan and the City's Appearance Review Manual. Staff Comment: The use is consistent with the General Commercial designation of the General Plan and General Plan which calls for expanded uses in the Commercial Tourist Zone. 2. The proposed project or use satisfies all applicable provisions of the Title (Zoning Ordinance). Staff Comment: with the approval of the proposed Zone Text Amendment, the use will be compatible with all provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. 3. The establishment, and subsequent operation or conduct of the use will not, • because of the circumstances and conditions applied in the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of the general public or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the use, or be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity of the use. Staff Comment: The proposed use will not be detrimental to the general public or working persons health, safety, or welfare. 4. That the proposed project or use will not be inconsistent with the character or the immediate neighborhood or contrary to its orderly development. Staff Comment: The proposed use is consistent with the existing and allowed uses along EI Camino Real. 5. That the proposed use or project will not generate a volume of traffic beyond the safe capacity of all roads providing access to the project, either existing or to be improved in conjunction with the project, or beyond the normal traffic volume of the surrounding neighborhood that would result from full development in accordance with the Land Use Element. BRI 0 Staff Comment: The proposed use is consistent with the traffic projections and road • improvements anticipated within the General Plan. Shared Parking Reduction 1. The characteristics of a use or its immediate vicinity do not necessitate the number of parking spaces, type of design, or improvements required by this title and that reduced parking will be adequate to accommodate on the site all parking needs generated by the use. Based on staff's analysis in the preceding sections, it appears that all of the required findings for approval of the requested Zone Text Amendment and both Conditional Use Peri -ii`e applications can be made. The Planning Commission is recommending that eh City Council approved the proposed project. Proposed Environmental Determination A revised Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study has been circulated to interested agencies and made available for public review. The amended environmental review determined that there would be no impact with the incorporation of mitigation measures outlined in the document and included in the attached resolutions. A resolution is included for the City Council to certify the proposed environmental document. Conclusion The proposed Zone Text Change, Master Plan of Development Amendment to allow an 80 -room hotel, and establishment of 3,400 square -feet of health care services is consistent with the General Plan and Atascadero Municipal Code, as analyzed within this staff report. Planning Commission recommends that the City Council to make all of the required findings for approval. ALTERNATIVES 1. The City Council may recommend modifications to the project and/or conditions of approval for the project. 2. The City Council may determine that more information is needed on some aspect of the project and may refer the item back to the applicant and staff to develop the additional information. The Council should clearly state the type of information that is required and move to continue the item to a future date. • liWA 3. The City Council may recommend denial of any or all portions of the project. The Council should specify the reasons for denial of the project and make an associated finding with such action. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1: Location Map, Zoning and General Plan Attachment 2: Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study Attachment 3: Draft Resolution A — Certification of Negative Declaration A;'achment 4: Draft Resolution B — Hotel CUP Amendment Attachment 5: Draft Ordinance A — Zone Text Amendment Attachment 6: Draft Resolution C — Establishment of medical offices ilm • • 0 • • • Attachment 1: Location Map, General Plan and Zoning Zoning: CT (Commercial Tourist) General Plan Designation: GC (General Commercial) 19 Attachment 2: Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study See Following 20 • • • 0 CITY OF ATASCADERO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ` CElVzr:-p 4 02 2007 JUCft ! "'LE CounyC(erWALD CITY OF ATASCADERO NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Atascadero Planning Commission will be holding a public hearing to consider the following project and environmental determination, The public is encouraged to attend. owners/ Ted Jacobsen, 8055 Cristobal, Atascadero, CA 93422 Applicants: JP Patel, 3600 El Camino Real, Atascadero, CA 93422 Project Title: Conditional Use Permit 2004-0137 Amendment Project 9700 El Camino Real, Atascadero, Ca. 93422 Location: APN 056-081-032 Project The proposed project consists of an application for a Conditional Use Permit for a commercial Environmental development located on 1.7 acres within the Commercial Tourist Zone and a Zone Text Amendment to Description: the conditionally allowed uses within the Commercial Tourist Zone to allow health care services/medical offices. Two building pads are proposed for the site. Building 1, a 15,000 square - foot office building is currently under construction. This building is currently proposed to house the medical offices. Building 2 is proposed to be an 80 room hotel totaling 51,740 square -feet. Four native oak trees are proposed for removal. Mitigated Negative Declaration 2005-0022 was previously certified for the construction of the office building. This document shall analyze all existing and new impacts due to the proposed amendments and shall supersede the previously certified document. General Plan Designation: General Commercial (GC) Zoning District: Commercial Tourist (CT) Environmental Begins: March 5, 2007 Review Dates: Ends: April 3, 2007 Hearing Date: April 3, 2007 Hearing City Hall Council Chambers, 7:00 p.m. Location: 6907 El Camino Real, Atascadero, CA 93422 Proposed Based on the initial study prepared for the project, a Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental is proposed. The proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration is available for public Determination: review from 03/05/07 through 04/03/07 at 6907 El Camino Real, Community Development Department, from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. . 1-1__ r,. ..L ,r,r Any int rested person m review the proposea miriguceu jveKutt- 1—L-1—u«�� �u Pt �.—J �• = ��•-�- - be dir ted to Kek Glon, Associate Planner at 461-5000, ext 3436. Steve�-e n G. i Development Deputy Director T Date Pmt Dne. 03PJ11071126 AM File: CUP 201140137.9700 ECR MND.1--d.k9.11w 6907 EL CAMINO REAL • ATASCADERO, CA 93422 • (805) 461-5000 • FAX 461-7612 21 CITY OF ATASCADERO CERTIFICATE OF FEE EXEMPTION 6907 El Camino Real Atascadero, CA 93422 805/461-5000 De Minimis Impact Finding Owners/ Ted Jacobsen, 8055 Cristobal, Atascadero, CA 93422 Applicants: JP Patel, 3600 El Camino Real, Atascadero, CA 93422 Project Title: Conditional Use Permit 2004-0137 Amendment project 9700 El Camino Real, Atascadero, Ca. 93422 Location: APN 056-081-032 Project The proposed project consists of an application for a Conditional Use Permit for a commercial Description: development located on 1.7 acres within the Commercial Tourist Zone and a Zone Text Amendment to the conditionally allowed uses within the Commercial Tourist Zone to allow health care services/medical offices. Two building pads are proposed for the site. Building 1, a 15,000 square - foot office building is currently under construction. This building is currently proposed to house the medical offices. Building 2 is proposed to be an 80 room hotel totaling 51,740 square -feet. Four native oak trees are proposed for removal. Mitigated Negative Declaration 2005-0022 was previously certified for the construction of the office building. This document shall analyze all existing and new impacts due to the proposed amendments and shall supersede the previously certified document. General Plan Designation: General Commercial (GC) Zoning District: Commercial Tourist (CT) FINDINGS OF EXEMPTION: 1. An initial Study has been prepared by the Lead Agency to evaluate the project's effects on wildlife resources, if any. 2. The Lead Agency hereby finds that there is no evidence before the City that the project will have any potential for adverse effect on the environment. 3. The project ❑"will ® will not result in any changes to the following resources: (a) Riparian land, rivers, streams, watercourses and wetlands; (b) Native and non-native plant life and the soil required to sustain habitat for fish and wildlife; (c) Rare and unique plant life and ecological communities dependant on plant life; (d) Listed threatened and endangered plants and animals and the habitat in which they are believed to reside; (e) All species listed as protected or identified for special management in the Fish and Game Code, the Public Resources Code, the Water Code or regulations adopted thereunder; (f) All marine and terrestrial species subject to the jurisdiction of the Department of Fish and Game and the ecological communities in which they reside; and (g) All air and water resources, the degradation of which will individually or cumulatively result in a loss of biological diversity among the plants and animals residing in that air and water. "!f the project will result in changes to any of these resources, the City has, on the basis ofsubstantial evidence, "rebutted" the presumption of adverse effect to these resources. A statement in support ofthis rebuttal is attached. 0 • CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the Lead Ag ' cy has made the above finding(s) of fact and based upon the Initial Study and the hearing record the project will not indiv ually or cu v ave an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code. �ijl �, &I, _. 36 L) St;�n r MCH s, Community Development Deputy Director 16afe , 0 Rl . CUP 2(W-0137.9700 P.CR.MND.rawnLkg..k. Prml Duo 03MI/1n11:26 AM 6907 EL CAMINO REAL • ATASCADERO, CA 93422 • (805) 461-5000 • FAX 461-7612 22 • • • CITY OF ATASCADER0 NOTICE OF DETERMINATION 6907 El Camino Real Atascadero, CA 93422 805.461.5000 To: ® County Clerks County of San Luis Obispo From: Steven G. McHarris, City of Atascadero Subject: Filing of Notice of Determination in Compliance with Section 21152 of the Public Resources Code STATE CLEARINGHOUSE #: This is to certify that the City of Atascadero, the ® lead/a ❑ responsible agency approved the above-described project on May 17, 2005 and made the following determinations: I . The project ❑ will ® will not have a significant effect on the environment. 2. ❑ An Environmental Impact Report was prepared and certified for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA and reflects the independent judgment of the Lead Agency. ❑ A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA and reflects the independent judgment of the Lead Agency. ® A Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA and reflects the independent judgment of the Lead Agency. 3. Mitigation measures ® were ❑ were not made a condition of the approval of the project 4. A Statement of Overriding Considerations ❑ was ® was not adopted for this project S. Findings ® were ❑ were not made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 6. The location and custodian of the documents which comprise the record of proceedings for the Final EIR (with comments and responses) or Mitigated Negative Declaration are specified as follows: Custodian: Steven G. McHarris, Communitv Development Deputy Director Location. , Commr0ity Development Department, 6907 El Camino Real., Atascadero, CA 93422 Deputy Director Fi1c NP 2(X)0.0137.9700 F.CR.MSND. d.kg.da Rml Dna 03101/0711:26 AM 6907 EL CAMINO REAL • ATASCADERO, CA 93422 • (805) 461-5000 • FAX 461-7612 23 Ted Jacobsen, 8055 Cristobal, Atascadero, CA 93422 !applicants' JP Patel, 3600 El Camino Real, Atascadero, CA 93422 Project Title: Conditional Use Permit 2004-0137 Amendment Project 9700 El Camino Real, Atascadero, Ca. 93422 Location: APN 056-081-032 Project The proposed project consists of an application for a Conditional Use Permit for a commercial Description: development located on 1.7 acres within the Commercial Tourist Zone and a Zone Text Amendment to the conditionally allowed uses within the Commercial Tourist Zone to allow health care services/medical offices. Two building pads are proposed for the site. Building 1, a 15,000 square - foot office building is currently under construction. This building is currently proposed to house the medical offices. Building 2 is proposed to be an 80 room hotel totaling 51,740 square -feet. Four native oak trees are proposed for removal. Mitigated Negative Declaration 2005-0022 was previously certified for the construction of the office building. This document shall analyze all existing and new impacts due to the proposed amendments and shall supersede the previously certified document. General Plan Designation: General Commercial (GC) Zoning District: Commercial Tourist (CT) This is to certify that the City of Atascadero, the ® lead/a ❑ responsible agency approved the above-described project on May 17, 2005 and made the following determinations: I . The project ❑ will ® will not have a significant effect on the environment. 2. ❑ An Environmental Impact Report was prepared and certified for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA and reflects the independent judgment of the Lead Agency. ❑ A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA and reflects the independent judgment of the Lead Agency. ® A Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA and reflects the independent judgment of the Lead Agency. 3. Mitigation measures ® were ❑ were not made a condition of the approval of the project 4. A Statement of Overriding Considerations ❑ was ® was not adopted for this project S. Findings ® were ❑ were not made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 6. The location and custodian of the documents which comprise the record of proceedings for the Final EIR (with comments and responses) or Mitigated Negative Declaration are specified as follows: Custodian: Steven G. McHarris, Communitv Development Deputy Director Location. , Commr0ity Development Department, 6907 El Camino Real., Atascadero, CA 93422 Deputy Director Fi1c NP 2(X)0.0137.9700 F.CR.MSND. d.kg.da Rml Dna 03101/0711:26 AM 6907 EL CAMINO REAL • ATASCADERO, CA 93422 • (805) 461-5000 • FAX 461-7612 23 CITY OF ATASCADERO PROPOSED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION #2007-0002 6907 EI Camino Real Atascadero, CA 93422 805/461-5000 Owners/ Ted Jacobsen, 8055 Cristobal, Atascadero, CA 93422 Applicants: JP Patel, 3600 El Camino Real, Atascadero, CA 93422 Project Title: Conditional Use Permit 2004-0137 Amendment Project 9700 EI Camino Real, Atascadero, Ca. 93422 Location: APN 056-081-032 Project The proposed project consists of an application for a Conditional Use Permit for a commercial Description: development located on 1.7 acres within the Commercial Tourist Zone and a Zone Text Amendment to the conditionally allowed uses within the Commercial Tourist Zone to allow health care services/medical offices. Two building pads are proposed for the site. Building 1, a 15,000 square - foot office building is currently under construction. This building is currently proposed to house the medical offices. Building 2 is proposed to be an 80 room hotel totaling 51,740 square -feet. Four native oak trees are proposed for removal. Mitigated Negative Declaration 2005-0022 was previously certified for the construction of the office building. This document shall analyze all existing and new impacts due to the proposed amendments and shall supersede the previously certified document. General Plan Designation: General Commercial (GC) Zoning District: Commercial Tourist (CT) Findings: 1. The project does not have the potential to degrade the environment. 2 The project will not achieve short-term to the disadvantage of Ion, --term environmental goals. 3. The project does not have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable. 4. The project will not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings either directly or indirectly. Determination: Based on the above findings, and the information contained in the initial study 2005-0022 (made a part hereof by reference and on file in the Community Development Department), it has been determined that the above project will not have an adverse impact on the environment when the following proposed mitigation measures are incorporated into the project (see attachment). Prepared By: Kelly Gleason, Associate Planner Date Posted: March 5, 2007 Public Review Ends: April 3, 2007 Attachments: - Location Map - Site Plan - Floor Plans — Office building currently under construction - Proposed Hotel Plans - Traffic and Parking Study File: CIDP VX14-11177.9701 ECRMND.revucLkg.d. Prim Dn , 03Nl/0711Z AM 6907 EL CAMINO REAL • ATASCADERO, CA 93422 • (805) 461-5000 • FAX 461-7612 24 C7 • L J 0 • CITY OF ATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM Environmental Review 2007-0002 Owners/ Ted Jacobsen, 8055 Cristobal, Atascadero, CA 93422 Applicants: JP Patel, 3600 El Camino Real, Atascadero, CA 93422 Project Title: Conditional Use Permit 2004-0137 Amendment Project 9700 El Camino Real, Atascadero, Ca. 93422 lnccatior: APN 056-081-032 Project The proposed project consists of an application for a Conditional Use Permit for a commercial Description: development located on 1.7 acres within the Commercial Tourist Zone and a Zone Text Amendment to Zoning: the conditionally allowed uses within the Commercial Tourist Zone to allow health care Surrounding Land services/medical offices. Two building pads are proposed for the site. Building 1, a 15,000 square - Uses and Setting: foot office building is currently under construction. This building is currently proposed to house the medical offices. Building 2 is proposed to be an 80 room hotel totaling 51,740 square -feet. Four native oak trees are proposed for removal. Mitigated Negative Declaration 2005-0022 was previously certified for the construction of the office Other public building. This document shall analyze all existing and new impacts due to the proposed amendments agencies whose and shall supersede the previously certified document. approval is required General Plan Designation: General Commercial (GC) (e.g., permits, financing Zoning District: Commercial Tourist (CT) Lead Agency blame City of Atascadero and Address: 6907 EI Camino Real, Atascadero, CA 93422 Contact Person and Kelly Gleason, Associate Planner Phone Number. City of Atascadero, 6907 EI Camino Real Atascadero, CA 93422 General Pian GC (General Commercial) Designation: Zoning: CT (Commercial Tourist) Surrounding Land North: Commercial Retail Uses and Setting: South: Highway 101 West: Commercial Tourist East: Public Other public None agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement) 03101/07 CUP 2004-0137.9700 ECR.MND.revised.k9.doc 25 Attachment 1 Location Map 5700 EI Camino Real Atascadero, CA CITY OF ATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY 03101/07 26 Zoning: CT (Commercial Tourist) General Plan Designation: GC (General Commercial) CUP 2004-0137.9700 ECR.MND.revised.kg.doc • • • • ---- ... ... .- -- 03101/07 CM" OFATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY Attachment 2 Site Pian CUP 2004-0137.9700 ECR.MND.rewsed.Kp.ao-. 27 OH3croNvir !0 A!!J .. or os.. �.mos.,. •,r,. o.x+r� a oo . .... s" r;r ao-�� �wn�,s�mc a 6 � �' gg y � 7 gg Y . V�'�'� 'JNIN33NION3 IWO �U X31900 'f ]la3 133rond 7310x 0830rDsrfr` wn, 3www M MOV., l CUP 2004-0137.9700 ECR.MND.rewsed.Kp.ao-. 27 03/01107 W. CITY 0FATASCADER0 INITIAL STUDY Attachment 3 Floor Plans - Office building under construction CUP 2004-0137.9700 ECR.MND.revised.kg.doC 0 0 0 • C7 • 03/01/07 CITY OF ATASCADERO INITL,IL STUDY Attachment 4 Proposed hotel Plans CUP 2004-0137.9700 ECR.MND.revised.kg.doc 29 ,i it r .lo� 1:71. _�I 4�L•Jo; �- E ..ti E e cE i � l a Oil 11 lit ..,.. ......... ........ �5� It� 111t 6i-�'`f�l � i- Ji IglEe°i� riSf �tl.{a=�.f CUP 2004-0137.9700 ECR.MND.revised.kg.doc 29 IlkJl.q r r 1 -�nW a� F?' 1T�'FY4 4l I _ 'Imr. ��esti 1e ��I�eml liw r 1RNl1 I I I ;, � I IW J!. i ',:�' 14 � •:� p I I F JJ 4id 1841' �1 � I yt��t�'. w tS ?�a� Tn � � , � � • � �4�;1 Israul � :... � ... nl 41f II'4w't G' c 1 r.� 1,111. }141 lad i'jy raj 1 i I � Mp VIA IY�dis" i rl � I r I I Sr , l 6 �,I6u1 1 I ^< I r }' 1®q� f x� 1 �nf �Ck�q V WW tI UYJ �dd3 .S I,' CCG Clu. 40411 YI Jii :.Gil ; � �n 1 A;i Al ' 131 (1�;Y O.JI IfaY aa'111f( e s �fr„4`wJ ism 7 2a ' Ill 11.'il4xl �Iltl ;.!~7W1+I /j 14.1 IJ ,r�{�I� ''ta an E 9 { I t •I I' • • • tf,� y'11 w 03/01/07 Attachment 5 Traffic and Parking Study See Following CITY OF ATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY CUP 2004-0137.9700 ECR.MND.revised.kq.doc 31 UUIN �UU6 Traffic and Parking Impact Study Patel Hotel Atascadero, California Prepared For: 1.P. Patel Vish Enterprises, Inc 3600 EI Camino Real Atascadero, CA 93422 • Prepared By: ©rosz Engineering Group, Inc. 1627 Calzada Avenue Santa Ynez, CA 934-60 805-688-7814 Stephen A. Orosz, PE, PTOE Traffic Engineer #1209 OEG Ref 30206 April 19, 2006 0 32 TABLE OF CONTENTS • Report Section Page INTRODUCTION PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1 EXISTING TRAFFIC OPERATING CONDITIONS 5 NEAR-TERM FUTURE OPERATING CONDITIONS 9 PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS 9 PROJECT IMPACT ANALYSIS 9 Trip Generation 9 protect Impact on Existing Conditions 12 Near Term Intersection Operation with Project 13 Parking and On -Site Circulation Analysis 13 MITIGATION MEASURES 14 Existing Conditions 14 Existing Pius Approved/Pending Projects Conditions 14 Project Specific Impacts LIST OF TABLES 1 Existing AM and PM Peak Hour Intersection Operation and Level of Service 1 6 2 Approved/Pending Project Trip Generation 3 Existing Pius Project AM/PM Peak Hour Intersection Operation and 5 • Level of Service 10 4 Project Trip Generation Summary 5 Existing Pius Project AM Peak Hour Intersection Operation and Leve! of Service 12 6 Existing Pius Project PM Peak Hour Intersection Operation and Level of Service 12 7 Existing Pius Approved/Pending Projects Pius Project AM Peak Hour 12 Intersection Operation and Level of Service 8 Existing Plus Approved/Pending Projects Plus Project PM Peak Hour 13 Intersection Operation and Level of Service 14 9 Shared Parking Analysis LIST OF EXHIBITS 1 Project Site Plan 2 2 Existing AM Peak Hour Intersection Tuming Movement Counts 3 3 Existing PM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Counts 4 4 Approved/Pending AM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Counts 7 5 Approved/Pending PM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Counts 81 6 Project Related Traffic AM/PM Peak Hour TECHNICAL APPENDIX • Raw Traffic Count Data Intersection Operation and Level of Service Worksheets 33 Patel Hotel Traffic and Parking Study INTRODUCTION The following traffic and parking study has been prepared for the proposed Patel Hotel located between EI Camino Real and E. Front Street, south of Montecito Avenue in the City of Atascadero. The scope of work for this report has been reviewed and approved by the City staff of the Planning and Public Works Departments. This report addresses the project's potential impact on existing and near term traffic operating conditions. Lastly, a parking analysis is provided to evaluate the shared parking program proposed for the project site. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project would construct an 84 room hotel. Access to the hotel would be accommodated via a single driveway to W. Front Street and through a shared driveway to EI Camino Real. Parking for 106 vehicles is provided for both the under -construction office building and the proposed hotel. The project proposes to share the parking facilities on the entire site with the office building. The current site pian is depicted in Exhibit 1. EXISTING TRAFFIC OPERATING CONDITIONS The study area for the project was determined to consist of the analysis of the traffic operating conditions at three intersections: Santa Rosa Road at EI Camino Real, E. Front Street/NB 101 On -Ramp, and W. Front Street/SB 101 On -Ramp. To form a base to evaluate the proposed project, existing intersection turning movement vehicle counts were documented. The existing lane geometry and traffic controls were also documented. The existing AM and PM peak hour intersection turning movement counts are summarized in Exhibits 2 and 3, respectively. To determine the intersection operation, the Highway Capacity Manual methodologies for evaluating level of service was used. This methodology provides a comparative tool in the evaluation of various traffic volume conditions. The end product provides a measure of delay for the average vehicle passing through the intersection and a letter grade for the level of service (LOS). The letter grade varies from LOS A (no congestion or little delay) to LOS F (significant congestion more than a minute of delay per vehicle). The City and Caltrans have set the goal of maintaining a LOS C or better operating condition on all intersections. With the traffic volumes depicted in Exhibits 2 and 3, the intersection operation was determined for existing conditions. The results of that analysis are summarized in Table 1. The LOS worksheets are provided in the appendix to this report. Location Santa Rosa Road at EI Camino Real W. Front/SB 1010n -Ram E. Front/NB 101 Table 1 AM and PM Peak Hour Existing Intersection Operation Traffic AM Peak HourPM Peak Hour Control Delay/LOS 1 I Delay/LOS Traffic Signal 20.9 sec All Way Stop 20.4 sec All Way Stop 29.8 sec • LOS C 123.8 sec per veh/LOS C • LOS C 21.3 sec er veh LOS C LOS D 1 37.3 sec per veh/LOS E 341 April 19, 2.006 Orosz Engineering Group, Inc i• w mu>fi :: eFq'?:.i sir, '• � ZZ4£6 OStl eE �,6�� 3Atl Otl30Y'tl0OSVIV �5YlY 0116 F �JNIa33NION3 llAl:) 1�3 4 kwiu�nr`r 63180E) 'r O1a3 k WHY 7ZR j _s SF V. 91 L�p..lyp—yGp 4W WOMMS 113d Il 110038'r 10'1 YOd 7310N—'9Nl '1N3NOU1P39VNV1 Old unun 35 Grosz Engineering Group, 36?nh 30206ex02.dw EXISTING CONDITIONS AM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION TURNING VOLUMES PATEL HOTEL Inc. QD 2 n N.T.S. • • EXISTING CONDITIONS PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION TURNING VOLUMES PATEL HOTEL Orosz Engineering Group, Inc. 3 30206 30206ex03.dwg N.T.S. Patel Hotel Traffic and Parking Study As seen in Table 1, two of the intersections currently operate at LOS C or better and meet the • City and Caltrans LOS standards. The third intersection W. Front Street and Santa Rosa Road intersection operation is at LOS D during the AM peak hour and LOS E during the PM peak hour. This intersection is currently operating at a level of service below the City and Caltrans thresholds. NEAR-TERM FUTURE OPERATING CONDITIONS The City has approved and is considering several other projects in the vicinity of the proposed project. To form a cumulative view of the future intersection operating conditions that can be expected, the traffic from these projects is added to the existing traffic conditions and the levels of service recalculated. The City has identified five projects that are located in the vicinity of the proposed project that would have the potential to add traffic to the study area intersections. The list of projects and their trip generation is summarized in Table 2. Where possible, the trip generation for a given project was taken from the traffic analysis for that project. If no data was available, trip generation rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers reference on Trip Generation, 7t�' Edition were used to estimate the amount of traffic generated. As seen in Table 2, the cumulative projects would be expected to add 6,380 Average Daily Trips (ADT) to the surrounding street system. During the AM and PM peak hours, the cumulative projects would add 452 and 458 trips respectively. The distribution of these cumulative project trips were taken from previous studies and from • local knowledge of the general traffic pattems. The distribution of the cumulative project traffic combined with the existing traffic volumes are depicted in Exhibits 4 and 5 for the AM and PM peak hours respectively. Using the traffic volumes shown for the cumulative traffic conditions, the intersection operation was recalculated. The results of that analysis are summarized in Table 3 below. The LOS worksheets are provided in the appendix to this report. Table 3 Existing Pius Approved/Pending Project Intersection Operation for the AM and PM Peak Hours Location Traffic AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Control Dela /LOS Dela /LOS Santa Rosa Road at EI Camino Real Traffic Signal 22.6 sec per veh/LOS C 25.0 sec per veh/LOS C W. Front/SB 101 On -Ram All Way Stop 52.1 sec per veh/LOS F 56.5 sec per veh/LOS F E. Front/NB 101 On -Ram All Way Stop 62.8 sec Per veh/LOS F 72.5 sec er veh/LOS F As seen in this table, the intersection operation of the E. Front and W. Front Street intersections with Santa Rosa Road are expected to reach LOS F with the traffic volumes from approved and pending projects. The intersection of EI Camino Real and Santa Rosa Road would continue to • operate at an acceptable LOS C. 38 Grosz Engineering Group, Inc 5 April 19, 2006 • 0 (o O C Q� 0 ti C C-R's -1—o LL. LL Y Y CL a Lo 00 r 6 T -E O CO r O r co (tip � r M L O N O M N N O N a CL Lf� C N Ln t-Cf)m O N O ti O lC) CD M U-1 d L O O LCA c O N O co co LD N a a CD� Q r r Ln C 0 o co N Op 0 N N N � Lo T K W N N U .O N C '6 X y � L6 C OL +y+ d C U OL N a LL d d O O =O O UC,y e a .+ 6. C. E E N d 00��� m m t6 d N M Nt Ln O aE E= ULL 0 39 1 APPROVED/PENDING PROJECT REFERENCE SEE TABLE 2 EXISTING PLUS INTERSECTIO Grosz Engineering Group, inc. 30406 30206ex04.dwg N.T.S. APPROVED/PENDING AM PEAK HOUR �1 TURNING VOLUMES PATEL HOTEL • • • • NQ) -D 7, 2 9� PROJECT SITE 1 APPROVED/PENDING PROJECT REFERENCE SEE TABLE 2 pPROV' D / PENDING Orosz Engineering Group, Inc. QD 30206 30206ex05.dwg N.T.S. EXIS ► ING PLUS A. L -- PM PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION TURNING P OIL► MES HOTEL 5 41 Patel Hotel Traffic and Parking Study PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS • The City has taken the initial steps to fix the short term traffic operating deficiencies at the Santa Rosa Road interchange. In the West Front Properties traffic analysis dated August 2004, the installation of traffic signals at the interchange was recommended to mitigate the impacts of the post project conditions. Currently, the City of Atascadero is conducting that analysis and design of the traffic signals and the necessary coordination with Caltrans. The City is also beginning the process of a longer term improvement for the interchange through a Project Study Report (PSR) — also recommended in the West Front Properties traffic analysis as a project mitigation measure. The PSR will look at the long term traffic needs of the interchange and would provide a document to base the ultimate improvements for this interchange on. The City of Atascadero also has a traffic impact fee program designed to address known future intersection and roadway capacity deficiencies. All projects in the City pay their fairshare toward these improvements that are coordinated by the City of Atascadero. PROJECT IMPACT ANALYSIS Trio Generation The proposed project consists of the construction of 84 hotel rooms. To estimate the number of trips that the project will generate, the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) reference on Trip Generation, 7th Edition was used. For this project, Land Use Code 310 — Hotel was used. Based on the trip generation rates in the ITE reference, the project is expected to generate a total of 749 ADT with 56 AM peak hour and 59 PM peak hour trips. The calculation of these trips is summarized in Table 4. The trip generation is based on the hotel operating at • 100% occupancy. In reality, the hotels in Atascadero operate at an average of 65% room occupancy. Therefore, the traffic analysis offers a conservative analysis of the potential project impacts of the hotel. The next step in the evaluation of the project impacts is to assign the project traffic to the surrounding road system. The distribution of project traffic is graphically depicted on Exhibit 6. The distribution of project traffic was assigned to the road system based on the following percentages: • North on Highway 101 40% • South on Highway 101 40% • North on EI Camino Real 10% • South on EI Camino Real 10% Project Impact on Existing Conditions To estimate the project's impact on existing conditions, the project related traffic was superimposed on the existing conditions traffic and the intersection operation recalculated. The resulting levels of service and delay are summarized below in Tables 5 and 6 for the AM and PM Peak Hours. • 42 orosz Engineering Group, Inc 9 April 19, 2006 Table 4 Patel Hotel Project Trip Generation Proposed Project • I ITE AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Rates Code ADT In Out Total In Out Total 310 8.92 0.39 0.28 0.67 0.34 0.36 0.7 Hotel AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Trips Units ADT in Out Total In Out Total 84 749 33 24 56 29 30 59 Hotel 749 33 24 56 29 30 59 Total Project NOTE: The hotel average occupancy is 65% for the Atascadero Market. Trip Generation is based on 100% occupancy. • I 0=0 Orosz Engineering Group, 34406 30206ex06. PROJECT RELATED TRAFFIC AM / PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION TURNING VOLUMES PATEL HOTEL Inc. $ in N.T.S. 0 • 0 Patel Hotel Traffic and Parking Study Table 5 • Existing Plus Project Intersection Operation AM Peak Hour Location I Traffic Control AM Peak Hour I Dela /LOS Pius Project Dela /LOS Santa Rosa Road at EI Camino Real Traffic Signal 20.9 sec er veh/LOS C 20.9 sec per veh/LOS C W. Front/SB 101 On -Ram All WaySto 20.4 sec per veh/LOS C 22.1 sec per veh/LOS C E. Front/NB 101 On -Ramp All Way Stop 1 29.8 sec per veh/LOS D 35.0 sec per veh/LOS E Table 6 Existing Plus Project Intersection Operation PM Peak Hour Location Traffic Control PM Peak Hour Dela /LOS Pius Project Dela /LOS Santa Rosa Road at EI Camino Real I Traffic Signal 23.8 sec per veh/LOS C 23.9 sec per veh/LOS C W. Front/SB 101 On -Ramp E. Front/NB 101 On -Ramp I All Way Stop All Wa Sto_p 21.3 sec per veh/LOS C 37.3 sec per veh/LOS E 23.2 sec per veh/LOS C 44.5 sec per veh/LOS E •As seen in these tables, the project is not expected to change the existing intersection levels of service at two of the intersections. These two intersections would continue to operate at LOS C. At the intersection of W. Front Street and the SB 101 On -Ramp, the project is expected to worsen the existing poor intersection LOS from D to E during the AM peak hour and add to the LOS E conditions during the PM peak hour. Mitigation measures are recommended for this deficiency later in this report. C Near -Term Intersection Operation with Proiect To determine the projects cumulative potential impact on the study area, the project traffic volumes were superimposed on the existing plus approved/pending project traffic operating conditions and the level of service and delays were recalculated. The results of that analysis are summarized below. Table 7 Existing Pius Approved/Pending Projects Plus Project Intersection Operation AM Peak Hour Location Traffic Control AM Peak Hour Dela /LOS Pius Project Dela /LOS Santa Rosa Road at EI Camino Real Traffic Si nal 22.6 sec per veh/LOS C 22.6 secper veh/LOS C W. Front/SB 101 On -Ram All Wa Sto 52.1 sec er veh/LOS F 57.6 r veh/LOS F E. Front/NB 101 On -Ramp All Way Stop 62.8 sec per veh/LOS F 71.3 sec per veh/LOS F Orosz Engineering Group, Inc 12 April 19, 2006 45 Patel Hotel Traffic and Parking Study Table 8 • Existing Plus Approved/Pending Projects Plus Project Intersection Operation PM Peak Hour Location Traffic Control PM Peak Hour Dela LOS Plus Project Dela /LOS Santa Rosa;Ro;aidat EI Camino Real Traf;;Jjfic Si nal 25.0 sec Der veh/LOS C 25.0 sec er veh/LOS C W. Front/SB 101 On -Ramp All Way Stop 56.5 sec per veh/LOS F 60.3 sec per veh/LOS F E. Front/NB 101 On -Ramp All Way Stop 72.5 sec per veh/LOS F 1 78.0 sec per veh/LOS F As seen in Tables 7 and 8, the project does not impact the near term future operation of the intersection of EI Camino Real and Santa Rosa Road. The intersection would continue to operate at LOS C. The project would contribute to the future LOS F conditions at the two Highway 101 on -ramps. Mitigation measures are described in a later section of this report. Parkina and On -Site Circulation Access to the project site is proposed via a single driveway on E. Front Street and a shared driveway to the east to EI Camino Real with the approved office building. A shared parking pool of 106 parking spaces is provided for the two land uses. On the hotel portion of the property, there are 60 parking spaces. Near the office building, the remaining 46 parking spaces are • located. As the two land uses have different parking characteristics, a shared parking arrangement is logical. The hotel parking demands peak during the late evening hours, while the office parking peaks between the hours of 10 AM and 3 PM. Using the Urban Land Institute (ULI) shared parking guidelines; a time of day shared parking demand analysis was performed. The ULI guidelines offer parking demand factors by hour of day for a variety of land uses so a shared parking analysis can be conducted. The results of this analysis are summarized in Table 9. As seen in Table 9, the peak site parking demand is at 9:00 AM with a total of 94 parking spaces. Based on the total provided of 106 parking spaces a surplus of 12 parking spaces is expected. The office peak parking demand occurs between 10:00 AM and 11:00 AM with a total of 51 spaces. The hotel peak parking demand occurs between 10:00 PM and 6:00 AM with a total of 84 parking spaces. Based on this mix of land uses and arrangement of parking, the shared parking program for this site should function well. Further, the parking analysis assumes an 100% room occupancy for the hotel. The average annual room occupancy for the City of Atascadero is 650/c. Therefore, the parking analysis represents a worst case conservative viewpoint. The internal circulation for the site was also evaluated and should provide good access to both land uses and for vehicles looking for close parking to their intended destination. In front of the hotel, we would recommend the handicapped parking areas be realigned to utilize a common access aisle between the two adjacent handicapped parking spaces. • 46 oro -cu Engineering Group, Inc 13 April 19, 2006 • Table 9 Shared Parking Analysis Patel Hotel Project Time Guest General Of Rooms Office Day 84 15.57 TOTAL 6:00 AM 84 2 86 7:00 AM 71 10 81 8:00 AM 55 32 87 9:00 AM 46 48 94 10:00 AM 38 51 89 11:00 AM 29 51 80 12:00 PM 25 46 71 1:00 PM 25 46 71 2:00 PM 29 50 79 3:00 PrVI • 4:00 PM 29 38 43 40 72 78 5:00 PM 50 24 74 6:00 PM 59 12 71 7:00 PM 63 4 67 8:00 PM 76 4 80 9:00 PM 80 2 82 10:00 PM 84 2 86 11:00 PM 84 0 84 12:00 AM 84 0 84 Parking Analysis assumes 100% occupancy of the hotel. The average hotel occupancy for Atasscadero is 65%., C 47 Patel Hotel Traffic and MITIGATION MEASURES Study Mitigation measures have been developed for each level of analysis in this report. The following mitigation measures have been developed based on the impacts identified in this report and based on mitigation measures of other area projects. Existing Conditions Based on the poor existing intersection operating cohditions of the E. Front Street/NB 101 on- ramp intersection, signalization of this intersection is required. The City is in the process of implementing this improvement. The installation of a traffic signal at this location is also a .condition of approval for the West Front Properties Project. Existing Plus Approved /Pending Projects With the additional traffic associated with the approved and pending projects in the area, both Highway 101 on-ramp intersections with Santa Rosa Road reach unacceptable levels of service. To improve the intersection levels of service, signalization of both intersections is required. To maintain the optimum traffic flow through these intersections, a coordination system between the two on-ramp signals and the EI Camino Real traffic signal would also be required. Additionally, the ultimate interchange improvements should be evaluated with Caltrans and San Luis Obispo Council of Governments (SLOCOG) using a PSR. Both of these improvements are conditions of approval for the West Front Properties Project. Proiect Specific Impacts The project by Itself does not trigger any additional improvements. Under existing conditions, the project would be expected to add to the existing PM peak hour deficiency at the E. Front Street/NB 101 On-ramp intersection and should contribute its fair share toward the improvements for this intersection. Under the existing plus approved/pending projects, the proposed project contributes to the pre -project deficiencies at both Highway 101 on-ramp intersections with Santa Rosa Road. The project should contribute its fair share to the improvements to this intersection. The project's fair share of the improvements is found by taking the projects contribution to the future intersection volume divided by the total added traffic volumes at the same intersection. The fairshare contribution is also provided for impacts based on 100% room occupancy and the average 65% room occupancy. The following is the calculation of the project's fairshare contribution to the interchange improvements: E Front Street/NB 101 On -Ramp Intersection 100% Occupancy 65% Occupancy Project added volume PM Peak Hour 42 27 Approved/Pending Project/Project Traffic Total 240 225 Project Contribution = 42 / 240 (or 27 / 225) 17.5% 12% W Front Street/SB 101 On -Ramp Intersection Project added volume PM Peak Hour 24 16 Approved/Pending Project/Project Traffic Total 247 239 Project Contribution = 24 / 247 (or 16 / 239) 9.7% 6.7% Orosz Engineering Group, Inc 15 April 19, 2006 • • • Patel Hotel Traffic and Parking Study At this point in time, the City has estimated the construction cost of the two traffic signals for • the Highway 101 ramps to be approximately $350,0 The project should be required to bond for its fairshare to these projects improvements, s ifc. Additionally,should other be the impacts to the interchange are not project sped the projects fairshare approved in the area impacting the Santa Rosa Road interchange, p j contribution should be recalculated until such time as the traffic signal improvements have been installed. o the interchange improvements, the project should In addition to the fairshare contribution t Gay the normal traffic impact fees. r� • 16 April 19, 2006 Orosz engineering Group, Inc 49 Traffic and Parking Impact Study Patel Hotel Atascadero, California Technical Appendix Prepared For: 1.P. Patel Vish Enterprises, Inc 3600 EI Camino Real Atascadero, CA 93422 • Prepared BY: Orosz Engineering Group, Inc. 1627 Calzada Avenue Santa Ynez, CA 93460 805-688-7814 Stephen A. Orosz, PE, PTOE Traffic Engineer #1209 OEG Ref 30206 April 19, 2006 . c City Traffic Counters 626.256.4171 Fife Name : sb101santa Site Code : 00000000 • Start Date : 3/2912006 Page No :2 Start Time I Left I Thru I Right I Total peak Hour From 07:00 AM' to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 intersection 07:30 AM 8 74 Volume 292 16 72 380 Percent 76.8 4.2 18.9 07:4,. ? ` E 21 106 Vn, ura_. Peak Factor High int 07:45 AM Volume 81 4 21 106 Peak Factor 0.896 � 0 • 110 177 33 320 34.4 55.3 10.3 20 46 8 74 08:00 AM 25 61 6 92 0.870 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 6:45:00 AM 0 0 0 01 0 0 10 285 89 384 2.6 74.2 23.2 5 77 2D 102 07:45 AM 5 77 20 102 0.941 —BE 101 Rwrpsfrrat Fd Out In Tam! ® 360 428 72 16 292 j 4 m;� O 2m J U �V _ �,� �fJafti ► � Ccn rI� 7:300 AM 21 292006 J o 9 !2006 8:15:00 AM `4 o m 3Iv ml 1 - Ikish W 0 r LeftThtu Riot 0 0 0 215 0 215 Out In Total 1084 282 0.961 51 City Traffic Counters 626.256.4171 File Name : sb101santa Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 3/29/2006 • Page No :3 3aK hour rrom 'tz:W ran ro w:--) rm - ruR 1 ui SB 101 Ramps/Front Rd Santa Rosa Rd SB 101 Ramps/Front Rd Santa Rosa Rd Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Volume Start Time Left ihru Right App. Total Left Thru Right E►Pp' Total Left Thru Right APp' Total Left Thru Right APP- Total Int Total 3aK hour rrom 'tz:W ran ro w:--) rm - ruR 1 ui Intersection D4:45 PM Volume 307 14 74 395 88 250 108 446 Percent 77.7 3.5 18.7 19.7 56.1 24.2 05.00 64 5 31 100 23 68 26 117 Volume Peak Pada: High Int 05:15 PM 05:30 PM Volume 72 6 23 101 26 66 26 118 Peak Factor 0.978 0.945 52 0 0 0 D 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 179 24 208 1049 2.4 86.1 11.5 1 49 8 5B 275 0.954 05:00 PM 1 49 8 5B 0.897 SE 01 t-rxxt Rd Ort in Total 113 395 74 14 307 Ttru Left 4 i O 'mml� � Noah -gym n m � o m o c — N29!2006 4:45:00 PM f— o� s m530:00 O PM io � c m 7-U.Mw Red J¢ N Left TWU Riaht 0 0 0 126 0 126 WToW SE 101 Ra/FW Rd • • City Traffic Counters 626.256.4171 Fife Name : NB101 santa Site Code : 00000000 • Start Date : 3/29/2006 Page No :2 • • NE lul Fwnpfir-ordRa Out in Tata) 332 0 332 0 0 0 pi it Ttw L+ 1 61 � tJo(m rp /20067:30:00 2 w WIC o �- 0:15:00 AM °1 "' m c llnstihed Left Th Ri M 121 104 32 82 257 339 Out In Tata) NP 101 Rwrd)/F Rd 53 NB 101 Ramp/Font Rd Santa Rosa Rd NB 101 RamplFont Rd I Santa Rosa Rd Southbound Left Thru Right�� Left Westbound Thru Right�� Left Northbound Thru RightTAop �� Left Eastbound Thru Right APR Total Int Total Start Time ask Hour From 07:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 07:30 AM 0 3 213 149 365 121 104 32 257 79 411 79 569 1191 Volume Percent 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 58.4 40.8 47.1 40.5 12.5 13.9 722 13.9 07:45 0 0 0 1 48 46 95 30 29 8 67 23 104 15 142 304 Volum: 0.979 Peak Factor High Int 6:45:00 AM 07:45 AM 08:00 AM 08:15 AM Voiume 0 0 0 0 1 48 46 95 I 35 26 10 71 16 116 22 0 912 oa.Lr ..*nr r- 0.961 0.905 • • NE lul Fwnpfir-ordRa Out in Tata) 332 0 332 0 0 0 pi it Ttw L+ 1 61 � tJo(m rp /20067:30:00 2 w WIC o �- 0:15:00 AM °1 "' m c llnstihed Left Th Ri M 121 104 32 82 257 339 Out In Tata) NP 101 Rwrd)/F Rd 53 54 • • • City Traffic Counters 626.256.4171 File Name : NB101 sant. Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 3/29/2006 Page No : 3 NB 101 Ramp/Font Rd Santa Rosa Rd NB 101 Ramp/Font Rd Santa Rosa Rd Eastbound Southbound Westbound Northbound Int Start Time Left Thru Right OPP i Left Thru Right �� Left Thru Right �� Left Thru Right Total Total Hour From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 aak intersection 04:30 PRP a 251 257 516 185 133 418 61 341 491 1425 Volume 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 6 48.6 49.8 44 3 31 8 2.9 12.4' 69.5 18.1 Percent 04:30 0 0 4 66 75 145 46 41 28 115 14 61 25 12Q 380 Volume 0 0 0.838 Peak Factor04:30 High int 04:30 PM PM96 41 28 05:00 PM 11 20 127 Volume 0 0 0 0 4 66 75 Q 18440 46 20 0.967 0909 Peak Factor 54 • • • City Traffic Counters 626.256.4171 File Name : caminosanta Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 3/29/2006 Page No :2 • • 55 Comino Real Santa Rosa Rd EI Comino Real Santa Rosa KU Eastbound EI Southbound W R 9h App. Northbound Left I Thru Righthpa� Total Thru Right App Left� Total Left Thru Righthpd� Start Time Left Total -eak Hour Fnxn 07:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 439 1558 Intersection 07:45 AM 560 2 11 240 303 5 548 125 6 308 1.4 70.2 Volume 7 389 164 18 2 63 6 18.2 43.8 55.3 0.9 28.5 Percent 1.3 69.5 29.3 84 2 167 28 2 90 120 421 07:4 n�: 42 133 0 1 0 1 81 0.925 Volume Peak Factor 08:30 AM 07:45 AM 07:45 AM 28 2 90 120 High int 08:15 AM 40 170 0 6 1 7 81 84 2 167 0.915 Volume 3 127 0.824 0.393 0.820 Peak Factor • • 55 Start Tune I Left I Thru I Right aak Hour From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PI intersection 04:00 PM Volume 4 504 230 Percent 0.5 68.3 31.2 04.45 1 151 70 Volume Eastbound Peak Facto, High int. 04:45 PM Left Volume 1 151 70 Peak Factor Right APP• Total 56 City Traffic Counters 626.256.4171 File Name : caminosanta Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 3/29/2006 Page No :3 no Kee Out in Toth 761 736 1499 230 504 4 Fagfrt Thru Left 1 L+ F°- Jth No( r � ��c d m C rp t—.{ 2t* 4:00:00PAA—j N 7 �- (11292006 4:45:00 PM 2. cD m m O n N 1- UnIat~ ♦ � 6 C On T r Left Thru Ri ht 3001 SS21 2 783 LSM7 1667 Out B Coffin RealTata! 2093 543 0.964 • • • Santa Rosa Rd EI Comino Real a= nosa o 5 R Westbound Northbound Eastbound Thru Right � I Left Thru I Right Total Lett Th Right APP• Total TotalLeft T�otaP Aeak 1 of 1 738 4 9 10 23 300 562 2 884 169 4 275 448 17.4 39.1 43.5 33.9 65.8 02 37.7 0.9 61.4 222 1 3 3 7 64 132 0 196 43 1 74 11E 04:15 PM 04:30 PM 04:15 PM 222 2 4 3 9 94 155 1 250 45 0 76 0.831 0.639 0.864 012' no Kee Out in Toth 761 736 1499 230 504 4 Fagfrt Thru Left 1 L+ F°- Jth No( r � ��c d m C rp t—.{ 2t* 4:00:00PAA—j N 7 �- (11292006 4:45:00 PM 2. cD m m O n N 1- UnIat~ ♦ � 6 C On T r Left Thru Ri ht 3001 SS21 2 783 LSM7 1667 Out B Coffin RealTata! 2093 543 0.964 • • • HCM Signalized intersection Capacity Analysis 4/18/2006 2: Santa Rosa Rd & EI Camino Real ,00 Lane Configurations !�r�w"ts�{'� �y�"u/y� y'�{�J/pJ pp: j 19. 19 ..e-rf�i�80 a'i � � '.il. ... �^w b..�51fM1VA1FY/ .�.�'!w 1[.e .F �:i1•i'nv uF+r[P i1Nid'. +ISP ..ur.c _ sa idallvia = 4 0 4 0 4 p 4.0 4 0 4 0 4 0 Total Lost time (s) .. T�.;lJ` Lane Ufd Factor m... ��.� x 00 1 00 1.00 0.96 Frt 1.00 0.85 0.98 . N:, Fft P t f= 1770 3396 K'� 1806 1770 3531 Satd. Flow (Prot) 1778 1583 1 gip, „' 0'1_1 "I Rt-Rerr it iys - 5' : ` 1 1770 3531 1770 3396 Satd. Flow (perm) 1778 1583 1806 ,44 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 4 0 92 0 92 099 1 7 ;: ., i25 :_:.fl8, ': .. 92 0.92 'Valu ( ? = Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 �w ,..:.._ 157 1861 . 8 , Adj. F O -J- �rp1�) 2 0 0 p 37 0 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 285 g . 0.. . ®pl7- ��{° t '"� � .:;;:. ,. �..���� t Lan_ L3tep: v� _ Pro Prot S lit Perm Split P Turn Type 5; 2 1 Prot�-phases Permitted Phases � Actttes�,��) 14.2 45.6 8 32 2 Effective Green g (s) _ 11 2 11 2 _ 1 4 cua:µNrw �r y pp Ei/� -a TJ,. Y :f�aY� ae`ii�r.+r� ..- _A11 a w �� LLIuFr rH �4.0 4.0 4 0 4.0 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4� � . � 'Iia '; .: V�t�ro"leI�l� _, 335 2147 19 1458 *., •Lane G Cap (vph) 266 236D u�5 Rat,o _ vis Ratio Perm 0.03 064 .0.:21 OSA : _ v/c Ratio 36.3 28.5 6.4 36.9 14.5 Uniform Delay, d1 29.5 28.0 11.x. Progression Factor 4.8 7.0 0.2 14.4 0.7 Incremental Delay, d2 2.1 0.5. 41.f Dbipy:{s) 31:isi - :5 C D D A D B C Level of Service-` 29.4 41_:1 18:8 pmaci :D614V; s)- D B B Approach LOS C Delay 20.9 HCM Level of Services ; C CM Average Control 16 0 -�.r ... S"S' ISI �/ai)repac[ty.ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) 75.0 Sum of lost time (s) :. e 1 rsei n a ifization 5 1.55 Analysis Period (min) 15 • Synchro 6 Report Ex AM Peak Hour Page 1 Orosz Engineering Group 57 HCM Unsignalized intersection Capacity4/1812006 5i Santa Rosa Rd & NB 101 On-R.amp - ,j,..-^'_';i�'ro� - •aS;Vlw,`'--Wi i�j� "S.i�`�c�l�..„'�r�- Aa�a aEi 3i. tir..4a+lh�hd� iu�r.+�.,.,._=.�l.t .t..x,_�z -- Lane Configurations .. ♦ 9 Y.°iar"�r'�'F'" 79 411 79 3 213 149 121 104 32 0 0 0 Volume (vph) _ IM r r., Hourly flow rate (vph) 86 447 86 3 232 162 132 113 35 0 - Volume Total Volume Righ, _.w - ALIn •]70 apacity (veh/h) 643 552 618 543 MW Q HCM Level of Service IN Mull xi I 15 Analysis Period (min)-_.-._,.,.-,, pix:+hrtrst�t,firrk.,miY�s'«?k,tFr�J:atw p fib' .�... Synchro 6 Report Ex AM Peak Hour Page 1 Orosz Engineering Group We • HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4/1812006 8: 'Santa Rosa Rd clx W. Front Lane Configurations Volume Tp187 33 0 0 29_2 72 ouri'flow rate ph Volume Total (vph) 417 3 55 .9 4 13--11. Volume Right (vPh) 97 36 78 re - He . adway (s) 5.8 6.1 6.2 Capacity (veh/h) 591 555 558 ,pr,% q. =2, pu m9 �gi * ri Y '�D'elay HCM Level of Service C OU I POP Analysis Period (min) 15 Own q.- W gOW,-, ;V Wgggqp� k7gg •W E Ex AM Peak Hour Orosz Engineering Group Synchro 6 Report Page 2 W HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4/18/2006 2- Santa Rosa Rd & E:I Camino Real ..'* --0. f- �- 4\ t r* \4' 1 41 Lane Configurations 41�►' ey� ` t `-' �...�7Y.;a ......e T�#� 4.0 4 0 Total Lost #ime (s) 4 0 4.0 4.0 4.0 0 ..��ENO- k �t i F rt x J k" VE 100 Frt 0 85 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 96fu� r y sy F y� ,ter r���°a?. �?( a- ��' �.... � i'a��.0 • , . q x+�`�.,��14� - � Z B E� 1778 1583 1806 1770 3531 y 1770 3394 . 4 �l�,m.n � .—y ; 3���xr"_ ��-'i��'wc:aW��. -_'-- �°�#�.r" ,:.�4Y�'� � �'.�y ''�taw.�+.�.,s.� �e5. �.r._.. '•s4'�st�'£4: ., Sato. Flow (perm) 1778 1583 1806 1770 3531 1770 3394 92 ,(P�ye��a"k-hour�fJjactor�yPHF 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 92 X92 0 9 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 285 0 � 0 �0 _1 0 0 3�8�{ , •, 0 Tum Type Split Perm Split Prot Prot iY?S ?u t A.�u. - ,T a.i-,r4�34rc ac u "�• x 'a`�S:'1�,>�n5}i-: �rh„ r �ti.eimai;,:���;�u�"nraalld.� iaP,.,h"�'��.,, ;����t't �� .�w>1z'�-'�' a,..a,+rme_�..: i 5�1:�/rNil. •lbc.Ya�.1AN5{ b� 'F1J'{'.L.4 .. :4.1... �;� u es 4 ,,•, �� •. - gin,. ������� �� <�`:. Permitted Phas Effective G_ reen g (s) 11 2 11 2 1 4 4 6 +�32 2 4 0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 266 236 1 34 335 2147 19 457 Lane G}rgqp�p Cap��(v�ph) &3 v/sRatio Perm _ 0.03 j15 M ...wOr t -e Ntiul.ilik ON �x+AlwkRM� Uniform Delay, d1 29.5 28.0 36.3 28.5 6.4 36.9 14.6 wt+.dGSICgA.s'�Wnr�-'y".,tl: el&'.t a;e JFV �iSt,�'' K, q Incremental Delay, d2 4 8 7 0 0 2 14.4 0 7 i �+c' 816 Level of Service L CC a D D Ax; Bl�fi Approach LOS HCM Average Control Delay --.--..20.9 HCM Level of Service dr Actuated Cycle Length (s) 75 0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0 Analysis Period (min) 15 ...... W. .aFb '"r -- Ex AM Peak Hour + Project Orosz Engineering Group Synchro 6 Report Page 1 9 • HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: Santa Rosa Rd & NB 101 ®n -Ramp 4/18/2006 Lane Configurations ..:. ?-. Saga« 213 149 131 114 0 Volume (vph) 79 411 92 6 , *� ; Peak fa mater -2 LDS""_ �� 4N>., ._,_ Hourly flow rate (vph) 86 447 100 7 232 162 142 124 37 0 Stop �..i.`9 0 0 Volume Total (vph) 633 238 102 303�Jx n ,a '��GZitT'h Volume Right (vph) 100 0 162 m37 r, _ ya IN ..a ,y�apa^.: ..°'��: �r.� as +5 f`* �YJ•'°F.'rs+ nvr�t£w.. 4h. �. Departure Headway (s) 5 7 6.6 5.8 6.6 u 4 .y Y;^�{`,:wnt'Riy-.+{µ,'a,.�.,a,5+�: yy�►,� R; R �v JJ ��Ixtrmt�:swniriu cEG�' � ..�.,�i ,�a� Capacity (veh/h) 632 543 608 542 wax, ; i�,"^ Approach Delay (s) 58 1 11 8 i�,�j� �Y_,,,j�d7J.;w;*`7�', !1;;nP7�w14"`.�r, �yv i HCM Level of Servicean x�r Analysis Period (min) 15 - i �---zR 717k - • Synchro 6 Report Ex AM Peak Hour + Project page 1 Oros? Engineering Group 61 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4/18/2006 8: Santa Rosa Rd & W. Front_ ,,* --.1. � (- *--- 1,-, � t 1* * � *1 1:1!2111 sna v Lane Configurations I "MOW" Volume (vph) q 10 285 j3 89 187 33 .0 0 0 305 16 72 0; 2 Hourly flow rate (vph) 11 310 97 130 203.' 36 0 0 0 332 17 78 Volume Total (vph) 417 370 427 01 'Trout Volume Right (vp I h) 97 36 78 Departure Headway (s) -FRAN Capacity (veh/h) C-6.0 Xb. 6.0. 6-..2 -6.2. Mu 572 549 555 Approach Delay (s) -21.4 19.4 25 0 p. RO., I i'MORIN 21Fr1Na12. 001 AM P PON- I tg�, "I � 't . . I HCM Level of Service Analysis Period (m Ex AM Peak Hour + Project Orosz Engineering Group 62 15 .4, E Synchro 6 Report Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis r- S�nra Rosa Rd & `I Camino Real a/1s/2ood � _ � k- 4, t � 1* 41 Lane Configurations *T T lclealca�✓✓?p�) 1,s9D0 �,9D�r-�„'���-*�.�... �:r� 4 ; ��. �,�,-�-.,.��90Q 1'�Oi�'� �l��D 1D Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 .4 .0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util.: dar og Frt 1.00 0.85 0.9.8 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 -�n F ' Zi ^..T ..... .yam � .�.y ,�,�., - ` �. :_.. ,�* -,� y ' ��"`.;° '`' tS"�;SJL'�.{3�L^JY�d...,>..;.: `itei.... "?J '� ''m`.'.�.� Sated. Flow (prot) s.fLk ,. 1778 1y58y3 .-� 35,ryF311 17�7y0 337/5 2.7 0.4 4.8 15.0 0.2 14 4 0.6 �1806 91j�777�0 Satd. Flow (perm) 1778 1583 4806 IRA 1770 3531 1770 3375 .Y.ZFiJ.111iS"Sre1��Yj,/aj.,�i�,,,-5'�„ Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0992�2 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.9!2 Adj. 7® " Jt. "a, RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 2�198�44 0 2 0 0 � 1 0 0 50 0 LAra Tum e Split Perm Split Type Prot �"J�f1:,:..."�tr..�.°.,���-�.. ProtM'tl'�7Jai Permitted Phases 4 Effective Green g (s) 11.5 11.5 1.4 14.2 45.3 •0.8 31.9 Actli�Y{",s� r �y ji�T^x�..R�+i ; t `i 9 i ,H,.���yi%�_�iiY Yz�! (&",'^n11Gpri.Y .K'.ei'r.Yl.em.M..zL+°,�I��..G'e�dkS/F�..S-�Y Cie .Ww'L". 4.0 4.0 4 4.0 Q^ Gt � Lane Grp Cap (vph) X73 243 34 335 2133 19 1,436 evIss; Ratio Perm 0.03 vlc natio OAK°M Uniform Delay, d1 29.4 27.8 36.3 29.2 6.5 36.9 14.9 Progression: tactor incremental Delay, d2 2.7 0.4 4.8 15.0 0.2 14 4 0.6 Level of Service C C D D A D B Approach LOS C D C.B HCM Average Control Delay 226 HCM Level of Service C s' �A:n4!d�!fl^'v' -..., �n..e��� _s�;�. ' wi+�•'�•f t,-x+ru}�Skw�'"��..}�.f"'t�^��e`R`�W.�'�. +.� ", �,A...,, �,2 .et �I���°K.:'; . ,- Actuated Cycle Length (s) 75.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0 Intersectrr a° a e ^ W i atican "Miewoolfcervi Analysis Period (min) 15 c C'�r:i LroP Ex AM Peak Hour + Approved/Pending Projects Synchro 6 Report Orosz Engineering Group Page 1 63 HCM Unsignaiized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5- Santa Rosa Rd & NB 101 On -Ramp 4/1s/2oo6 ---* —O► --,* E-- 'I- 4� t /� 1 t a �tiYihV C _ _ � -: Lr ', ,»,. �... »� .�r ..�..«...... � ...n..n�..�..1h�i �F•4'T� rF.a. - Lane Configurations g ations 4* y�trl: � : Stogy �ta►p - Step �'tc�p. _ Volume (vph) 115 463 83 9 223 199 158 105 32 0 0 0 nur; actor012 0 B.P2 0 * Oy9 0:92 0:92 0:92 492 Hourly flow rate (vph) 25 503 90 10 242 216 172 114 35 0 0 0 Volume Total (vph) 718 252 216 321 Volume Right (vph) 90 0 216 35 Departure Headway (s) 5.9 6.6 5.9 6.6 .. .. '�j}yy� A �a.��ya yp�{•�,• _{j;�J.•tr' ��y�m' 4...r�jir' 4 4^" S fl!^_.�(w= i � �j'f �u��' •.�. �� 5er1 Capacity (veh/h) .... 605 535 599 525 o._a teir?�Fa ',i'?.?,����.alk'k"^�.'r.'.t�,�^_'�:uer�`av���.!�T.��+i�SXv:'�'w.�;:•b�-�s•1'�ie.��y�,_i��,�. :. _..r �-�;a'%� �`y-•.mac. �'.�:'t�ls+ � ate., ,." }� ... _..>n �'�. Approach Delay (s) 115.3 12.5 18.7 l Rd HCM Level of Service F intersettiion4 A— x .e.. -+w<a.+?.. ..�•+w' �wewe.w .serwr.«.,winw.r.,...m=�i. ..,�WN Analysis Period (min) 15 _ M.g,c"'-�.l Ex AM Peak Hour + Approved/Pending Projects Orosz Engineering Group Synchro 6 Report Page 1 • .7 • HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4/18/2006 8: Santa Rosa Rd & W. Front ni,V OWNx. Lane Configurations �r ''� t+ ym�� Jigi�IVi9 i, r ,� x a'r.+,ar;»5-�tttr a.. x'.?a iQ 37955 85 Volume (vph) 22 285 89 122x 187 g�112 0 ��0.. } ��'�r^� s7��y�� t ig}LwJ�'s`� BOO ` o'a'�'.� mow.-..�a,.''.u,�...2 i1isAld,l'��'�=Yro�Yi'rt"^Y,SJk,A: at:�-.y., E "S Y* Hourly flow rate (vph) 24 310 97 133 203 122 0 0 0 412 60 9� 11! 11 � NINE Volume Total (vph) 430 458 064 T 'ra 'M*4,-t. x,EY.yCStiS� y. # - Wv._ . e5 �m T .( 6 w is A.v« .2.. c k r Volume Right (vph) 97 122 92 .�j Departure Headway (s) 6.7 6.7 6 Zi IQ,grE'B Capacity (vehlh) 527 529 542 Iti Approach Delay (s)31.7 36.7 60.1 c kd xA i a5 v wt n'q� ,ub j �xi��,4x Wes nFaw' a h .... .......�_.�.__,...... ,. . .y-,;�ar,an—.,::..... nCv�nr"�,..:.. 1S.,, c... i.,.w„�..1.....,.•n l.:'�'.,_ia.�..aa'"iax. .. o.., X,t..s..-.„�__..:Y.,'MFix'�H7.4r,�..-... ,v...,...1'x..�G� �Gh,wu.. HCM Level of Service "r�i4r+GW<r � ¢'.tMGMWO i s f Analysis Period (min) 15 T� ",�• 3Lvr' T�”, "fi Y'�'fm 5�`vr . �rE - '..;:9Y+�f'k"%i^;'E.}•�.if!'iiL�.pn,:iro-C Y-,k4u.wJ ... rY.. Synchro 6 Report Ex AM Peak Hour + Approved/Pending Projects Paoe 2 Orosz Engineering Group 65 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4/18/2006 2: Santa Rosa Rd & EI Camino Real Satd. Flow (prot) Satd. Flow 1778 1583 1806 A t00 IRna 1770 3531 3531 1770 .3373 1770 3373 FEli�7iF u1'.�^.t..�FMN F'�"Ir,'.C:7:@u^'^S' 1: . .�F:.. ii i.�.yM7•�r -., �:.:.u,:... 0 92 0 92 0.92 . ..: ... .. .. 0 92 0.92 0�1.�92 0 Peak -hour factor, PHF 092 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 92 Lane Configurations �y _i=t 19 .° 1.90,0 1s0'6 IWO Irieal 0 .. RTOR Reduction (vph) 4 0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Total Lost time (s) 4 0 4 0 1 D 1 k 445" Fi � [�1. Larae'Ut�! Victor ' ` 1 tin �0, :. 0.85 . 0.98 1 00 1 00 1.00 0 95 Frt 1.00 _...__._ � Satd. Flow (prot) Satd. Flow 1778 1583 1806 A t00 IRna 1770 3531 3531 1770 .3373 1770 3373 FEli�7iF u1'.�^.t..�FMN F'�"Ir,'.C:7:@u^'^S' 1: . .�F:.. ii i.�.yM7•�r -., �:.:.u,:... 0 92 0 92 0.92 . ..: ... .. .. 0 92 0.92 0�1.�92 0 Peak -hour factor, PHF 092 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 92 96 A,Ij;lral�� 0 1 0 0 52 0 .. RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 284 0 _ ..:, 0 2 0 F �r7:hSM'.>—'k'd'w`•^�C.t_W,..:�i. Tum Type Permitted Phases it Perm 4 Prot Prot 11 6 11.6 1.4 14.2 45.2 0 8 31.8 Effective Green, g (s) �� a '�'.T,.r'.'.'.'!.?j. Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4 0 4 0 4.0 4.0 40 40 3L ^,ys x';'r ._..v'7,°j�,�F �xi}-" a.{ 'YSa .... V. '�'t ►J ..._._ ,_ 1�hazafe3s�►:. , r r t 19 1430 Lane GrpCap (P) 5 (vph) 275 245 34 n ,128 leff >. ,ry��►kA( y fil Y, ' -OV Kr Ax+'Er'2� 11 hm v!s Ratio Perm 0 03 - : _� � � '��(. ; , O;t32-O't1fi . v#C f� 29 2 6.6 36 3 Uniform Delay, d1 29.4 27 7 _ y� 369 150 150 02 144 08 Incremental Delay, d2 2.7 0.4 4.8 64 MIA Dy D _ Level of Service ; r `uo3� lttr'� moi. F D �, DA. g te. rB. , _.. C ,,._. D Approach LOS C Level of Service C 22,6 HCM Lev HCM Average Control Delay _ 75.0 Sum of lost time (s) 160 Actuated Cycle Length (s) litermc ion.l;a}aac iii ac n, Analysis Period (min) 15 C Ghtical Lane'Group Ex AM Peak Hour + Approved/Pending Projects + Project Orosz Engineering Group 0 S nchro 6 Report Y Page 1 0 l� u • HCM Unsignalized intersection Capacity ynalysis 4118/2006 5: Santa Rosa Rd & NB 101 Gn-Ram ia.4D�H Fr: x r:6.6 Departure Headway (s) 6 0 6 7 6 a.r r i �d;Rsu{iLY bVKY� i .5 xrtF.� ::+k»rMi. r lila�irSf7,`C .a . -k E 525 537 526 Capacity (vehlh) 595 �.ny���` �`'�'�..'4=-.. , I1 20. HCM Level of Service Il'rion : xr� 4o�A�"1U Leuelfce Intersection Canty 15 Analysis Period (min)�� ', I I 0 Synchro 6 Report Ex AM Peak Hour + Approved!Dending Projects + Project Page 1 Oresz Engineering Group 67 Lane Configurations+41,Stop O �+ �n .�,;as� ajigr 44W"��taelar��'°; . '::?!7:� ''; ,v^hi �. ,:i'" "�v`•s.�F;'^Is'i:.n:ux 96 12 223 199 168 115 34 0 0 Volume (vPh)�ar 115 463 " o D X22 ,::. 13 242 216 1 125 37 0 Hourly flow rate (vph) 125 503 104 Volume Total (vph) J ha 1yf 345 ¢] f - 733 255 Z'1= -. m .n~ x.95' i 'I'm�k�� F 6 A.IRS. �F _:..+i.i.._. „ems' n,.. a/!��, �o "OWNaf. ti...�., .._ _ ... Volume Right (vph) -104��.� ��3�r��a—MIMENMWA ia.4D�H Fr: x r:6.6 Departure Headway (s) 6 0 6 7 6 a.r r i �d;Rsu{iLY bVKY� i .5 xrtF.� ::+k»rMi. r lila�irSf7,`C .a . -k E 525 537 526 Capacity (vehlh) 595 �.ny���` �`'�'�..'4=-.. , I1 20. HCM Level of Service Il'rion : xr� 4o�A�"1U Leuelfce Intersection Canty 15 Analysis Period (min)�� ', I I 0 Synchro 6 Report Ex AM Peak Hour + Approved!Dending Projects + Project Page 1 Oresz Engineering Group 67 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4/1812006 8: Santa Rosa Rd & W. Front JA,� 4 4+ 'Wp 392 55 85 VQ -SA2 0 426 60 92 Volume Total ((vph) 430 471 5y7�J8� -a�' � ' rttATY�1J __'.... . ... V"'�iliy, .Y= :x Yx.'wd . Volume Right (vph) 97 122 92 Departure Headway (s) 6.8 6.7 6.8 Degree U 14062, x 0;3'1 _, `$ Capacity (veh/h) Cortrbl b,Qv, 523 529 532 _ -. ... Lane Configurationsp ?P _ Approach ' '_;✓ '- _ StoStQp Sign -i}:_ 22 285 89 134 187 112 0 0 Volume (vph) Ht�rur or 0 `Q.92. Beak Hourly flow rate (vph) I . 24 310 97 146 203 122 0 0 JA,� 4 4+ 'Wp 392 55 85 VQ -SA2 0 426 60 92 Volume Total ((vph) 430 471 5y7�J8� -a�' � ' rttATY�1J __'.... . ... V"'�iliy, .Y= :x Yx.'wd . Volume Right (vph) 97 122 92 Departure Headway (s) 6.8 6.7 6.8 Degree U 14062, x 0;3'1 _, `$ Capacity (veh/h) Cortrbl b,Qv, 523 529 532 _ -. ... . Approach Delay (s) 32.2 40.2 90.8 r, Approach ' '_;✓ '- _ intersection - U ORO O. Analysis Period (min) 15 y ....... „' s.:_ wntY"r.•;+�.aY 'YM .J"5 .te: ..SiH.. ' .. _ . .r.. ... .. + Approved/Pending Projects + Project S nchro 6 Report Ex AM Peak Hour App 9 J J Orosz Engineering Group Y Page 2 • HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4/18/2006 PH K FI Camino Real Lane Configurations ideal Fienr..a)) 1 Total Lost time (s) Lane tlttl. F.8dtor Frt Ftt-t d7 Satd. Flow (prot) Satd. Flow '� � �� � ,�` fir• I �! .-,..�.... t . 0.92 0 92 0 0vv��92 0C.9 19C �r id: � '.� 7 �?.," .,vim. IrtT �0.0 :.. � Vi w W .1911.0 300 fes, 40 .. 40 4.0F 4.0 4.0 4.0 40 0...._ 0208 '.� i;z,,.� 58 s�266 237 ig x _MW rr (., 0 94 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 96 1.00 0.85 ✓L t Vs 1770 3380 1776 1563 1738 1 770 3538 38 n rv. .mom.... .. _... . 1770 3538 � 1770 3380 1776 1583,,, ;�rs��w. �s x �7!?nvxkc; q x.t3•, i.:S {.:ri. via .. 5. 0..,r .+,. -. __ K r.. 0.92 t . 0.92 0 92 0 0vv��92 0C.9 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.1.991 2� 0.92 0.7 4 - 1."1.;' ;a�,'k79 dN AdJ- Floax� { # ..".1:$4`::..4 '. a..�a..:' grr.`e{ p 0 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0...._ 0208 '.� i;z,,.� 58 s�266 237 ig x _MW Turn Type Split Perm P•rlU.l,�,�,�:'"_�'�+.�'�^� ��'s' ,f +'�wrF� ::i'� �mM. h.n .,� � u� �! Permitted Phases 4 Prot 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 �4 234 p 0 43 0 Prot 36 1 _.�.: Effective Green, g (s) 13.5 13 5 �T9OR s.p Aatuatedi?� 0.7 4 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4 0 15 Vey dei , 421 2229 16 1356 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 58 s�266 237 ig x _MW rr (., vis Ratio Perm „��0 02 i 55.' vlc 42.4 31.7 7.5 44.3 20.7 uniform Delay, d1ii 36.4 33.3 ad..t@ - x96Lx�� Progresspn`Factcr 2.2 6.6 0.3 81 1.6 Incremental Delay, d2 8 3 0 3 a4 ,. Delay: :..... 44-Y D D A D C Level of ServiceOU �� _.. , �`4 , • Approach 0 HCM Average Control Delay 23.8 collo ty ' 0, 2' }elti�me��-ap Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 intersection Capacity iization 62 B%o Analysis Period (min) 15 c {,r icaMane Group Ex PM Peak Hour Orosz Engineering Group IC n- C Synchro 6 Report Page 1 MO HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: Santa Rosa Rd & NB 101 On -Ramp 4/1812006 Lane Configurations siw-tet.:0 Volume (vph) 61 341 89 8 251 257 185 133 100 0 OY 0 ]� i MPJ �� Houriy flow rate (vph) 66 371 97 9 273 279 201 145 109 0 0 0 IN Volume Total (vph) 534 282 279 454 ,��-'�a;� ��- �L'JI�+!ln���e� � � Volume Right (vph) 97 0 279 109 4 &" i,�-,a'uc.'�'._ DepartureHeadway (s) 6.6 7.4 �t�y6�. 6 6.8 -Woo-, 9'" ,:�,:�'k,r. .. fir." 4-cetsc#` w.4-iw:m,.. a.c+. - Capacity (veh/h) 541 478 540 530 uwo y Approach Delay (s) 58 6 � 7 0 37 4 r..i nq two •a'^a-r b a, k+� �. v� '� � m ,�j ,H.{L-�'t�rPc-s: �w,.F +�Ef .�'¢w,�� 5� M .� �' HCM Level of Service E 0.,�• i �{ sLi -�.w� ,. ,.y.�.•*,de,�-- """ x _ .enc-.-Yrn � oc .^^��.s� t'� t+'�-rN-'�a^ � r Analysis Period (min) 15 MPr�v:..`.�.�+�?�-�R.�'�=",.^"»crt.,-�"Fc.-se�T�i4rii'.', Ex PM Peak Hour Synchro 6 Report . Orosz Engineering Group Page 1 70 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4/18/2006 nta Rosa Rd & W. Front 12.9 24.2 22.3 HCM Level of service Analysis Period (min) 15� yy -� 7 t MOW,`� Ex PM Peak Hour Orosz Engineering Group synchro epo Page 2 71 Lane Configurations 4+AW ki Op Sign, 88 250 108 0 0 0 307 14 74 Volume (vph) 5 179 24 (P) �{ ,- z a2 ,�° r�� a��afiE o 480 Hourly flow rate (vph) 5 195 26 96 272 117 0 0 0 334 15 Volume Total (vph) 226 485 429 tG '� cxsx kM�'it]urCw9,i9�.'�7e$'i.?.,�..,i+ G+r.Fl?Li,•-«�s< ..,.._... f,. ,• yW, p ! a� �j �r �F cy7 �''-• LLar+I a r: �'af' �r y�i�� i ua�L�k.Y^' ut' n 12.9 24.2 22.3 HCM Level of service Analysis Period (min) 15� yy -� 7 t MOW,`� Ex PM Peak Hour Orosz Engineering Group synchro epo Page 2 71 Lane Configurations 4+AW ki Op Sign, 88 250 108 0 0 0 307 14 74 Volume (vph) 5 179 24 (P) �{ ,- z a2 ,�° r�� a��afiE o 480 Hourly flow rate (vph) 5 195 26 96 272 117 0 0 0 334 15 Volume Total (vph) 226 485 429 tG '� cxsx kM�'it]urCw9,i9�.'�7e$'i.?.,�..,i+ G+r.Fl?Li,•-«�s< Volume Right (vph) 26 117 80 Haj'() Departure Headway (s) 6.1 5.6 6 0 Capacity (veh/h) 546 619 577 3, ...:n,..n.a..wr.•'r.srr-....^.•*.r'^3`Ys4�e}.'6%_"tt`]fa'YA,S^.PT]I.RCu�ii'-.�inmawy'^'], ,. ..., y.tl0�,µ` Yani��a4^��' 12.9 24.2 22.3 HCM Level of service Analysis Period (min) 15� yy -� 7 t MOW,`� Ex PM Peak Hour Orosz Engineering Group synchro epo Page 2 71 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2- Santa Rosa Rd & CI Camino Real 4i18/2o06 $ 3 Lane Configurations 4.0 4 0 4.0 4 0 Total Lost time (s) 4 0 4 0 4 0 � _ k .'}"�{ m. � - y-' ='.b �5"t._ry'�.," T."r� �y � 4 t�'�''{+� �(i,���15��{,�`'�r 7.'`'�� -,t �Jd�, ��i � � P i� • -� �•^7 {. � � •Sls,:4 �j F gnu_:. .:°;.i�?w,,.�7;L�.�..:--+Y�'^S �L�.°?1�P�'"u3eE$L?sn.�'Rua:^�'S:eN�{�. .�i.'��J�"��vru'....'�.'u.i; aaxa�x::n.�ti, ���.ri. -'_ � • �, 00 1����,��k'���,`�-1...Y.-:°.,,� r.Yam Frt 1.00 0.85 04 1..00 1.00 0. 5 .9 n a 3379 Satd. Flow (pro#) 1776 1583 1738 1770 1776 1583 1738 1770 3'538 337 Satd. Flow (perm)_.r,.=-.�..,_�.�-,�g�:.�.�•-::3c;,���W;:.�,,7�u,.�n�:-:: � ..:�°r_�5r*f`"`'._`':�'�"�'k'si*�,;.rXKva'r'wr.:e�tW;.c.'�x3x�.c�e::.:..;,.,i d a..t.r.0oN s�..:-....�.-,��-•-. _..........:...... Peak -hour factor PHF 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 92 0.92 092 .n�ia RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 208 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 43 0 Turn Permitted Phases Effective Green, g Perm Prot 13.6 13.6 3.0 21.3 56.6 Prot 0.8 36.1 '�IvMwta�7A�nv-.;emeanu.m-..•.._.,...—_ _ Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4 0 r 4.0 - 4 0 4 0 4 0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 266 2 w 13 ��, 8- � •_:..�. ���5 16 3 - ,,r.� -..- +�.�mx�«�s:� A^ .131 20.7 Uniform Delay, d1 36.3 33.2 Cly�� p��y 't't i:'uu"•�;...r+ 42 ilncrem("ental Delay, d2AN 83 03 2.2 67 03 81 16 m u� ESWdi '. 1s.'a"E,�,. F . _v - h,r. , r. D A D C.:. _�_.._.__...w.._.ti..�D,:�.,,�.,�,�;.�.,�..;:�;� ch LOS -B HCM Average ConiroiDe/la 23.9 HCM Level of Service gg 'atlDs "�S xd�e ai a. 160 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90 D Sum of lost time (s) — :.:scur.-.�-. Period Ex PM Peak Hour + Project Orosz Engineering Group 72 15 Synchro 6 Report Page 1 0 • HCM Unsignalized IntersE;ction Capacity Analysis 4/18/2006 5: Santa Rosa Rd & NB 1-31 On -Ram t .-'W- "�s, PG,•:. -L..:' +'S+# Lane ConWNWfigurations :, „I .°.• . 4,1--Rig�257 0 Volume (vph) E 1 341 101 11 251 255, 7 197 3 145 10p3 0 astm tikr-r ' r� u r� F`�.,caM,.,,.... `�'.t%'b�z��.'.}�. n..r. _,k� i.�p(C�Yyy].� „�..:..,, ��.fy!) Volume y P hi �' i'_'E�k•'='I'i.{,7`7«" .,..,�,.. .',',.�,.,:tiid4:.'..._ _. ,]•Pt9:; ,i r"'6. ,r,.ui ;i Hourly flow rate (vph) i6 371 110 12 273 279 214 158 112 0 0 >� 0 Volume Total (vph) � F,47 285 279 484 - y ��') ?.:-'N•iy��r�.'I. "f�Vl`4" `p r�'�"y' Y,1 ,Ui�r er�-. w Volume Right (vph) J 10 0 279 112 _� �2 y}, RMY �z. F�.. i yii,�-SJ�yY,✓,I�r*¢ a '� 9'.Ry'" "`�''F`�ft,i'�w'e..�G.'. 'c'�4'�haw •S:-*t?f t$ p .F.. t�N,`�S'r.� �P�> Departure Headway (s) ^, m�+°r •:. {iii 1� i�"��"4i+t, - + ¢• � t� '��''�lE.'�.�'Sis��� fru�f.;'Im��y �'�ri�. .2: k�'„� iti.� � �p,�j�i ,,��11 �.:a1�u1// CePt. .0 .YY1� ri1 Capacity (veh/h) yy�am'' ��,y��9• 527 469 528.p 523 a yS ,1T44� YN'�fIVqn•M'MS�FF f�` +�_ ....� �,('�KS+tlMSLiY �"+�w�.' .. 1 H' ' 'C ,�{ :001yy`�n!� �y/�y PYI.iR r . Approach Delay (s) 72.33 17.5 44.5 � hv;f ..�.4'.,'��. �,�” x.. <' :..• . HCM Level of Service fJ.:..TP'NWap[ r A9 intersetviarCit� fi . Analysis Period (min) 15 • • Synchro 6 Report Ex PM Peak Four + Project Orosz Engineering Group Page 1 73 HCM Unsignaiized Intersection Capacity Analysis 8- Santa Rosa Rd & W. Front 4/18/2006 --il —. --* f 41 *- 4\ t "I '* � d Lane Configurations 4+4+x7TY �y}� F�£.]��. ,�g i' r. ,. a 'fid•` ��t���,+,, rc e "r",.�1�1"�'. .,,,(., Y�7..w`,���:.�'C �{*.r�,_��!'� __x.w ...,r . .�4�mur'''��iir ��. 4�'•i� n%L`�a�`''� �4?F'R��FCf�....�'n3itl�`"a'���++t,'`1�,� %''n�,�+?a"? t;�'y�Y+ zxi• ��A� :.::., .. Volue (vph) 5 179 24 100 250 108 0 0 0 319 14 74 FIOW Houflow rate (vph) 5 195 26 1 Q9 272 117 0 0 0 347 15 80 tF. - Volume Total (vph) 226 498 442 Volume Right (vph) 26 117 80 _ MA lltt._ "�•'i.'.-rF. h.� 4_'FV,.n!°�.�.•ii7' Y+Sk+=si-"^.•h'-r' ?3' x'.,.... r e„ �'+,siF�,"'� C .....;' �. - Departure Headway (s) 6.2 5.7 6.0 .c.'M's7W"f�-t.^r Capacity (veh/h) 537 612 573 HCM Level of Service C Analysis Period (mwn)4 , 1 Y 5i .�✓. � r+,m:.n� ... 'Sn,�,w ....-,,,u .fin 4u r� � .. ._ Ex PM Peak Hour + Project Synchro 6 Report Orosz Engineering Group Page 2 T 0 l� u HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: Santa Rosa Rd & EI Camino Real 4/18!2006 Lane Confiqurations f' +4 Total Total Last time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 �.,1�'��t"�dY,.r✓_ ��k-`�'x�T.'`� wig..'-�`�w7���?���i' S`'`' LTa"��.;:���'.`�T,a`-d..�� �u��rt�Z...�mn.� :<»x. ,- �'`a+�-'+t*`? Frt 1.00 0.85 0 94 1.00 1 00 1.00 0.95 -: - �€S'�._.. � ,,... Satd Flow (prot) 1776 1583 1738 1770 353'8 1770 3369 � _ .' • �� � F �.r �' `� �.. 38 1770 3369 Satd �F�lowj (perm) 1776 1583 1738 1770 35 "� �n_� F -. Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 _ 0.92 0.92 1 0 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 209 0 11 0 0 0 O 0 5 r�ermil't�6 �w�MProtProtaeyua p a hXe yr`rRltl1d.C$ Phases nil, ONr'c'�x w� 111'i' r� "4� N"r "�r oiurn'YrtMn. R+yfQ+arG-�-sean...�vsm+r� rrm rvm w.-. 35.3 Effective Green s _ 3.7 22.0 56 0.8 �' . 13 7 13 7 �aG'--f Clea anc (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 70 1 � X221 10 1321 v!s Ratio Perm 0 02 _ ... .. v*;r 5'N r �}y�q�� •'u ei"d^w`rwSaA x`.1.'-':,Pl y�"�f �`{�1"yn� �1 n �'.-�"ry-' � w,� �,. k+� � - - f ii��4^Yd`.��-+S-.,•_tT'�rtra�'dnr�'�'w"ay Unrform Delay d1 3fi 3 33 1 42 4 31.9 7.6 44.3 21.5 t.,F i�sAi: q ai'errr^F' Y��f:7 210.3 t�xx inc11 remental Delay d2 8 8 0 3 2 2 9 6 0 3 �,,..»ri:sxz,:. 1.9 :a'N:iy;; 8.1 rrc' LCdPlf,.�(i mJ fiilarwFnr: ''',moi Yin" w� '":�:r,��rrro4i?&' 1�w vsaar 3.rr�wa�+w yu." '. D"" - - D A D V Level of Service D C � z �.e, yrs 'Yi,, C�.?y. _�`�-�3.nfGf�e 'i"nGF1m.tC;tw Approach LOS D D B HCM Average Control Delay 25.0 HCM Level of Service CYC . .. . ......... .. ... ......... ..... .-rarservinr. �«.«rnw..e�nmmNAWa�'i.�9cVMim.'.�=',' ., i_: �M'.. `9MPCM1'.i.1.{•v�°.H'� k h.i�"W..'.�::R39!'�$�P61Y 4tfi'f. iS� p�^^Y. ,..KY�f�. t 16.0 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90 0 Sum of lost time (s) r Ex PM Peak Hour +Approved/Pending Projects Synchro 6 Report Orosz Engineering Group Page 1 75 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4/18/2006 5: Santa Rosa Rd & NB 101 On -Ramp OsII i , Lane Configurations Sign "Chad{ y Volume(vph)96 _394 90 82'1159 30.(�8Y�; 228 137 103 0j 0 0 _ :192 '7.�cU,: ,.,:t�-:.�z..x �.,„Y�'-}'�}h'+ Hourly fiow rate (vph) ...{ 104 428 989 282 335 248 149 112 0 0 0 17N 4 Voiume Total (vph) 630 290 335 509 Vofurneei; Volume Right (vph) 98 0 335 112 gt 1 Departure Headway (s) 7.0 7.5 6.8 6 8 Capacity (veh/h) 523 462 511 525 Approach Delay (s) 138.1 20.1 55.5 �+ _.-��.�`-..n'`�._....,,."�.:.�F••.,ye%„'��H�_�,�,'.V•.�'.fFi .y• Ii•`i'u4t ,'�r`Croil'.�� .. w;Ei�t.. ;M%.... .... HCM Level of Service Analvsis Period (min) 15 Ex PM Peak Hour + Approved/Pending Projects Orosz Engineering Group 76 • Synchro 6 Report Page 1 • HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4/18/2006 8: Santa Rosa Rd & W. Front A ti 4— k 4, �► Lane Configurations Sign Volume (vph) t�t t 17 979 24 100 250 192 0 0 0 370 52 88 � - 0,92 Pea=W' ft�r 0 402 57 96 Hourly flow rate (vph) 18 195 26 109 272 209 0 0 n 'CA Hal Departure Headway (s) 7.0 6.3 6.4 �„_�W �a d_01 ?:..°; f �narity (veh/hl 512 567 554.,.. r . Approach Delay (s) 15 8t ^69.8 60.0 HCM Level of Service �. W-- inter. ....e.. `:::,;�.w.., w.. 3.'S?r4�53r.....Yw:r.e��* t.�...t....,�,....s Analvsis Period (min) 15 • IsSynchro 6 Report Ex PM Peak Hour + Approved/Pending Projects Page 2 Orosz Engineering Group 77 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: Santa Rosa Rd & EI Camino Real 4/1$/2006 • Lane Configurations Total Lost time It (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 L-�ai�'t'.�i��r `.. . f.14f15T1 � t7��aw: ^ .. , .,�'°�:.: s•.m' r �.�.'" ` ,�.. ��b,r�,J"�A 'F .,"a-, Y �,. ��� � �, , ^,'lat" Frt 1.00 0.85 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 :v�.r�,�....�.nTr� �4. Flow ( 1776 1583 1738 1770 3538 1770 3367 ,. -W �.1C�t3.��lb"KKA:i]:YtYC`fi�.3.ce:d.�'fY:.. YL^aL�h�L.a.. ._�.-.. �_. ___..�. �.�.:......�.....-,......,..a...-.._.....,__••_ _-.�.._...._--__ _-._ -. Satd. Flow (perm) 1776 1583 1738 1770 3538 1770 3367 i3awg'.°�""Cid•i�T.MsiS`4.•afuit...��s'i:nw�n-.�to-.,ww:r;i4�rw �mws,�-w;rrs ,r<�.r«.-+n.,.,.r..,...,-..-n.,,.e..�._..,.,,..,........................,.-.__...,,.... _..__. --. ._ Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 W- .n lbj tl .e7J' a1 Inlvcr'i"'j 'S ' h .. �L RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 w209 0 11 0 0 0 ug 0 d 0* 52 0 Turn Type SplitPer m Split Prot Prot �, nagaeIla vkw L0l c air a3� u Permitted Phases 4 --_.�.�.���........._..�.�..�....�.�..:...�.:.urs+:aa.wn:...�mn..•�•.i�::�t>:IDL.Li.SYC.!H:*.Ne/hF)`: ''Fr�i':r�1�4Y7:hiMt�JXYwiLL+-� +T'e;.ti.�`'•x.�rw. - r...._.»w-�.�,..„:.:...... ...e....... ... __.._� Effective Green, g (s) 13.7 13.7 3.0 22.0 56.5 0.8 PTu. � [iA1.Al��+�u4�P3LFi.�4....tYYYI'A&HM m .. n •. - : . Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 NINE.- .. ,. 4.0 4 0 {�` -re.x,.rcm�c.p u. -n ar x a ,-'�5.},;;n r `qf;t��' .h Y !k-•?���,,�h'�- � � .s. n. of 4.• �•-..�.F'-Vis.:;.. _, Lane Grp Cap (vph) 270 241 58 433 2221 16 1321 MOV-1 S v!s Rano Perm 0 02 .kti.0 Uniform Delay, d1 36 4 33 1 2.4 31.9 7.6 44.3 21.5 � Incremental Delay, d2 9.3 0.3 2.2 9.6 0.3 8.1 1 9 T . ; �2r-�s•�,� • U -o �ytr'ti'�'iiR,c •:'```•i�i.a�s q" oma• --z,.:. ij ,r�y1Wtr t o, u: cri do �. I�33'A"7��,z..�.:i •a-,s;^9r....'_ :�--tw,�u.,-..,,, �+�r�n:�-^'`ri �.,._z ,�w. '4°•1.,.x' �:.a-. .,)t.�+"'�"A7PN`"��+tYii.-.+nrt'�".�".�."=,aL�L,? ,s ... ,.. Level of Service D C D D A D C Approach LOS HCM Average Control Delay 25.0 HCM Level of Service C - -._.._..._.__--..__.....__.�.._....__..a.�..,�.-T.......�ua - .._.w..a.,.-«xw:zrsvF_w..�.s. xnwaenea'n nit,.:rta.i:.,eRR.".rc.:.MRsu'➢i-.NX�n.S...::`.:;.,-;. .. Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0 Anaiysis Penod (min) 15 .,,s ... ' x � twr� f •y'. d ti*�t ",may;. ,n".`.x_ .r ,mi l"3' �' �ti "&�:,�:+'. Ex PM Peak Hour + Approved/Pending Projects + Project Synchro 6 Report Orosz Engineering Group Page 1 HCM Unsic nalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4/1812006 5: Santa R:)sa Rd & NB 101 On -Ram Ah 3�CEA•'-'°sv y r,p'°� Mr a+ h"'-,:�.. �"f1({,.� .�.y4�.rg+"���,r'd.,'.inh. `�,Ftir,'�'.� dr aze,y..,atTM73,Fi`.nx�uiti�ss,4,'+sTw',Us:",`•°',�i''49 16':.:`r..rr�a4riw.� -. Cela :tu x HCM Level of Service �3� �� ivi' l.+T..l�iv r •' ±Y.r:�" NO wniN. .-Z'.'�'...if,'. I�P� i.� _..7« :��" "�. Ana 15 iFAs Period (min} a c+ k a n �u•4 �cnv t. rn 7 x" ¢ SRRK9.'Ri�e�'�" 34` (n u «7F�i[n �5u�ii .�t� I •mowa Gr :.w s�3 St M :. •hro 6 Report Ex PM Peak Hour + Approved/Pending Projects + Project SyncPage 1 Orosz Engineering Group 79 losioll {�p "- ^ 9 MAIM Lane Confi(,urations Stgn..�c�n�r I r� .��,' a�.r''u���� 0 Shoo 0 Volume vph) 96 394 102 11 259 308 240 14 106 ti0 092 ��ZIP,H,yaM m. _. �D 3 �'k Peaisoaird _h �.�_E yr 2. �261 6. 115 0 0 0 Hourly flov to y (P) 428..11.1. 282 :O Volume 7 oral (vph) 643 293 33 5 538 ::. SFW S c I�j yY , •FYI 'QAC 'aiww ;k' x? s+'iPi t p ,�. . . ff- Volume 'Ztght (vph) FM 111 0 335 115 - x Departs a He (s) 68 6.9 7.6 6 9y s 4 Capa i y (vehlh) 532 460 509 538 1�7?':....: .!sd"5,a.�tw ..r'�,w,.-.3iV ..'�•. ., ?p?p??((}}4��p�Qt`a"3Ke�.."a�� ht. d �J F". s -+++..,. MM iJiSl'Ll.V1vIT�ajk�"'inr�diF»''x'+�rii�i roach Delay (s) APP. H�'.xssr. 69 6 141.0 20.8 69.6 `mak'" 3�CEA•'-'°sv y r,p'°� Mr a+ h"'-,:�.. �"f1({,.� .�.y4�.rg+"���,r'd.,'.inh. `�,Ftir,'�'.� dr aze,y..,atTM73,Fi`.nx�uiti�ss,4,'+sTw',Us:",`•°',�i''49 16':.:`r..rr�a4riw.� -. Cela :tu x HCM Level of Service �3� �� ivi' l.+T..l�iv r •' ±Y.r:�" NO wniN. .-Z'.'�'...if,'. I�P� i.� _..7« :��" "�. Ana 15 iFAs Period (min} a c+ k a n �u•4 �cnv t. rn 7 x" ¢ SRRK9.'Ri�e�'�" 34` (n u «7F�i[n �5u�ii .�t� I •mowa Gr :.w s�3 St M :. •hro 6 Report Ex PM Peak Hour + Approved/Pending Projects + Project SyncPage 1 Orosz Engineering Group 79 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 8: Santa Rosa Rd & W. f=ront 4!18/2006 Lane Configurations Sign=Gttl:,. Stop.; -� Stop Volume (vph) 17 179 24 112 250 192 0 0 0 382 52 88 0.92 0:92` 0.92 >Db2 . '-bi'92 0:92 D 92 .0:92 0:92 2 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 18 195 26 122 272 209 0 0 0 415 57 96 MR ON h1` M -t. � Volume Total (vph) 239 602 567 _ v.n... Y,917r,r-40. .. Volume RicOht (vph) 26 209 96 'ter m f''�5t'�1ti*�.> q - ., f'F •'����i£''1O-• £[�..r•++sye a�.�Fr` iy�•'M'� F. i Departure Headway (s) 7 0 6 2 6.4 Drp 9:4 "I� ; eg ee�a ,�t _ � _ Capacity (veh/h) 512 571 567 t Approach Delay� (s) 15 8 72 3 66 2 ., +-5.��Ali {s. � �P41 �'i'� '}�'k '�' z• ,� k" ��' � "an � o- ,'N'"'�„_�mtdt4i_.�6a._���!Nu,�f�. ------ �.�.., �nwr RFSF..,. .,..%C 3 _•� •j v kbu. v+ni/�4�.! Wq Ka� Fw�'t�i-.° pP Ex PM Peak Hour + A roved/Pending Projects + Project Synchro 6 Report Orosz Engineering Group Page 2 HCM Level of Service F Intersection, tiftzaii8ri 82 N. CU Level of Analysis Period (min) 15 • pP Ex PM Peak Hour + A roved/Pending Projects + Project Synchro 6 Report Orosz Engineering Group Page 2 MEMORANDUM TO: J.P. Patel • Vish Enterprises, Inc FROM: Steve Orosz Orosz Engineering Group, Inc. Date: February 26, 2007 Subject: Change of General Office to Medical Office RECEIVED i=EB 2 7 2007 cOMMUNITY DEVELDPEEHE DEG Ref 030206 The City of Atascadero has requested an update for the traffic and parking study to address the change of 3,360 Square Feet of the general office uses in the building adjacent to the proposed rote' t_o medical office uses. This memorandum describes the trip generation changes and parking demand/supply changes that could be expected with this change of land use. Trip Generation Using the same ITE trip generation methodology as the main traffic report, the proposed change from general office to medical office for 3,360 SF would add 2 AM peak hour trips and 7 PM peak hour trips. The original and updated cumulative trip generation tables are depicted in the Table's 2 attached. The additional traffic associated with this change of land use would not significantly change the intersection levels of service for the study area intersections. The proposed hotel project impacts would not be expected to change. • Parkin To estimate the hourly parking variations with the proposed medical office uses, medical office parking data coliected by DEG at a medical office facility in Arroyo Grande was utilized. The peak parking demand for the medical office occurred at 3.8 spaces per 1000 square feet of office space at 10 AM. With the change from general office to medical office, the peak site parking demands would slightly increase to 95 spaces at 9:00 AM assuming 1000/0 occupancy of the hotel and office building. With a parking supply of 106 spaces, a surplus of 11 spaces at the peak time would be expected. The parking surplus represents 12% of the parking demand. The updated parking demand is summarized in Table 9 attached. For these land uses, a typical parking surplus of 5% would normally be a good parking supply due to the fact that the parking space users do not turn over a significant amount like a retail establishment. Additionally, the hotel was assumed to operate at 100% occupancy during the peak weekday time frame that the office and medical office peak. Based on actual occupancy data provided by the hotel operator, the peak weekday occupancy for the hotel is 72%. The monthly and daily occupancy data is provided in the attached table. Using the actual peak weekday parking demand for the hotel, the hourly parking demands were recalculated. The peak site parking demand would still be expected to occur at 9 AM with the peak parking demand totaling 82 spaces with 24 vacant spaces on the site, as shown in Table 10 attached. Weekend parking demands would be significantly less as the offices are closed. Based on the parking supply -demand analysis with the medial offices, the project site is still • expected to provide sufficient parking to support all of the planned land uses using the shared parking lot. Orosz Engineering Group, Inc. 1627 Calzada Avenue Santa Ynez, CA 93460 (805)688-7814 Page 1 82 • • 0 � M v -Far-- CD I, r CO C,4 LO (D ti I- I- r O F- � o C O S 2 C CO V r N C CN V M V O CD N N C O a) O r r N IL n- 2 2i CL C co CO N M C LO ly Il- p co 00 N CD p r r (p 00Cn N r NU-) CD t• tt O O O S 2 Y CV I� Y LO M N a)OpM O NONMNM� � � Q Q C S O C 1� 'a' N lD O Li LL CO Y -in- v p M v O O N co N L1 CL Q N Q O to CO O O Ca r N O C) r'CD O Cn p tf7 N En_ r L O LU _0 O U p r M () a) LU ti N N U X w a) m 'O X 2w � a) N E y O Q' O C V p C U +- N LL U N O C O C O O N 4) "00 CL IL ~ a) Q) a) 00��� to O d ego �a a) > CD U C o LO V O Q. a)��rNMV U N >Z ' CD h- O F-- U = H LL • • 0 � 0 2 m m O . 2 Q_ le 7 N 'T -F4 CD C6 N 'p O I— `r'-� LqC = O L C 0 T i Cl) C) �- a� N O N � Q O � Q N • N E E O"T CV OJ Ln N — N O () 0 (Q (V C Q CD U7 r le 7 N 'T -F4 CD r N r CD ti V `r'-� LqC = O r N r r Ln 7 Cl) C) �- 0 2 N 00 Y N (h 7 ti T cz 0 0 O"T CV OJ Ln N — N O n :D O co CD U7 r V O Ch = N [ri m r --co Cl) r p r N OD OD NT C6 OD N CD 0 N CA O CD N O rt 0 j LO IT2 OCC (~7 co O O O N N N 00 � (n N Q CD (� 0 0 C 1— N O LO r O N Ll LL LL U)(Dcf) r N r M C N D O [t N N (D N Q Q Q Q r r r r LO I` Cl) CD LD r CC O p p (6 O r Cl) N CD U.)jz O N CD r p co CD N CA cn r Q x w Ln O O CD CU r N M (D (n t` 1— N tn N U) @ U D �y C W N X_ w N U X_ d (D E 0 (ii O 0 C1 �_ U 0 CL (U C p7 p 0 C6 N CL U U =p cn pip p to —>� a an i— U i cc d 00 2 � C O •— CD > N 0 O c cD to E �j cc O U_ 'a O N r N Cl) G L O C) a cn C �+ 020 F=U Fes- LLL 83 LA fi�ei r o I NI I i GP CO co O I � • co t fire O i e U') I co I v CO Lo .° i o LO O`' I rn m LOI I � co co ED ~ I `- 0 co CF) U) I P I I c I 0- i r Q o CN I I t (D 7 Q 0 N _ 3� CO r Cn (` LD I m r .. 0 10 10 �\ I O I rn PQ CD co O I O i Lo _ I a •I a� Gr N co° Co' LO co CD O O tri - �a� I c N I N N m Y Y CD ,ate°a co CC) ce) LO co I � I = m a m w m o j R m E d is m m o E 6 !r Y 0 V O d O 0 O d V I���O F�0 F-��ro ��0 • Table 9 Shared Parking Analysis Patel Hotel Project Time Guest General Medical Total Total Total Of Rooms Office Office Parking Parking Vacant Day 84 12.21 3.36 Demand Supply Spaces 6:00 AM 84 1 1 86 106 20 7:00 AM 71 8 2 81 106 25 8:00 AM 55 25 6 86 106 20 9:00 AM 46 37 12 95 106 11 10:00 AM 38 40 13 91 106 15 11:00 AM 29 40 12 81 106 25 12:00 PM 25 36 8 69 106 37 1:00 PM 25 36 9 70 106 36 2:00 PM 29 39 9 77 106 29 3:00 PM 29 33 10 72 106 34 4:00 PM 38 31 9 78 106 28 10 5:00 PM 50 19 8 77 106 29 6:00 PM 59 9 8 76 106 30 7:00 PM 63 3 8 74 106 32 8:00 PM 76 3 6 85 106 21 9:00 PM 80 1 2 83 106 23 10:00 PM 84 1 0 85 106 21 11:00 PM 84 0 0 84 106 22 12:00 AM 84 0 0 84 106 22 Parking Analysis assumes 100% occupancy of the hotel. The overall (weekday/weekend) average hotel occupancy for Atasscadero is 70%. • Table 10 Shared Parking Analysis Patel Hotel Project • Time Guest General Medical Total Total Total Of Rooms Office Office Parking Parking Vacant Day 84 12.21 3.36 Demand Supply Spaces 6:00 AM 60 1 1 62 106 44 7:00 AM 51 8 2 61 106 45 8:00 AM 39 25 6 70 106 36 9:00 AM 33 37 12 82 106 24 10:00 AM 27 40 13 80 106 26 11:00 AM 21 40 12 73 106 33 12:00 PM 18 36 8 62 106 44 1:00 PM 18 36 9 63 106 43 2:00 PM 21 39 9 69 106 37 3:00 PM 21 33 10 64 106 42 4:00 PM 27 31 9 67 106 39 5:00 PM 36 19 8 63 106 43 6:00 PM 42 9 8 59 106 47 7:00 PM 45 3 8 56 106 50 8:00 PM 54 3 6 63 106 43 9:00 PM 57 1 2 60 106 46 10:00 PM 60 1 0 61 106 45 11:00 PM 60 0 0 60 106 46 12:00 AM 60 0 0 60 106 46 Parking Analysis assumes 72% occupancy (peak weekday average) of the hotel. The overall average (weekday/weekend) hotel occupancy for Atasscadero is 70%. • s: CITY OF ATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY Exhibit A Timing Responsibility Mitigation !Monitoring Measure Mitigation Monitoring Program GP: Grading Perm P5: Plervwtg Sery ces CUP 2004-0137 - Amendment (Hotel and Zone Text BP: B&gP�ry BS:Bui&VSermes TO: Teq=ry FD: Fire Department Change) 000Loarwy PD:PoiceDepamrerd FI: Frei inspection CE: City Engineer FD: Ftiel Occupancy WW: Wastewater CA CiN AMmy 9700 El Camino Beal AMWC:WaterCortp, Mitigation Measure 1.c.1: The following landscape mitigations shall BP BS, PS, CE apply: l The project landscaping shall include street trees along the EI Camino Real and East Frontage Road frontage placed a minimum of 30 feet on center or at locations complimentary to the architectural design of the proposed buildings, subject to staff approval. • All proposed parking area trees shall be shade trees of 15 - gallon size and shall be double staked. Mitigation Measure 1.c.2: The proposed 'buildings shall include the use BP BS, PS, CE of paint and roof colors consistent with the architectural style as designed. The hotel building shall incorporate high quality brick veneer of a dark earth toned color as depicted on the attached elevation exhibit. The hotel building shall utilize darker earth toned accents and fagade colors, subject to staff approval. Awnings and/or similar accent features •shall be included throughout the building. fagade and along the lower floor level to enhance the architectural appearance of the building and mitigate the proposed additional height. 0 Mitiaation Measure 1.d.1: If exterior parking lot lighting is proposed, it BP BS, PS, CE shall be designed to eliminate any off site glare. All exterior site lights shall utilize full cut-off, "hooded" lighting fixtures to prevent offsite light spillage and glare. Any luminaire pole height shall not exceed 14 -feet in height, limit intensity to 2.0 foot candles at ingress/egress, and otherwise 0.6 foot candle minimum to 1.0 maximum within the site. Fixtures shall be shield cut-off type and compatible with neighborhood setting, subject to staff approval. BP, GP PS, CE 3.fJ.1 Naturally Occurring Asbestos (NOA) has been identified by the state Air Resources Board as a toxic air contaminant. Serpentine and ultramafic rocks are very common in the state and may contain naturally occurring asbestos. Under the State Air Resources Board Air Toxics Control Measure (ATCM) for Construction, Grading, Quarrying, and Surface Mining Operations, prior to any grading activities at the site, the project proponent shall ensure that a geologic evaluation is conducted to determine if naturally occurring asbestos is present within the area that will be disturbed. If naturally occurring asbestos is found at the site the applicant must comply with all requirements outlined in the Asbestos ATCM for Construction, Grading, Quarrying, and Surface Mining Operations. These requirements may include but are not limited to 1) an Asbestos Dust Mitigation Plan which must be approved by the District before construction begins, and 2) an Asbestos Health and Safety Program will also be required for some projects. 03/01/07 CUP 2004-0137.9700 ECR.MND.revised.kg.doc M C=OFATASCADERO h Its ' JI I Exhibit A Mitigation Monitoring Program CUP 2004-0137 - Amendment (Hotel and Zone Text Change) 9700 EI Camino Real Timing BP:GradiP: Briting PermVPennng r Bit T0: Ter1mrary oxwar>cy FI: Final nepection F0: Faal Cxmarwy Responsibility /Monitoring PS Pui�9 es BS: Building Servces FD: Fre Deparirneirt PD: Policeoepartinenl CE City Engineer WW. Was*"*r AMWC: Wafer Cortp, AMWC:WaterG Mitigation Measure tvfltiaation Measure 3.b.1: The project shall be conditioned to comply BP, GP BS, PS, CE 31.1 with all applicable District regulations pertaining to the control of fugitive dust (PM -10) as contained in sections 6.3, 6.4 and 6.5 of the April 2003 Air Quality Handbook. Section 6.3: Construction Equipment ■ Maintain all construction equipment in proper tune according to manufacturer's specifications. • Fuel all off-road and portable diesel powered equipment, including but not limited to bulldozers, graders, cranes, loaders, scrapers, backhoes, generator sets, compressors, auxiliary power units, with ARB certified motor vehicle diesel fuel (Non -taxed version suitable for use off-road). ■ Maximize to the extent feasible, the use of diesel construction equipment meeting the ARB's 1996 or newer certification standard for off-road heavy-duty diesel engines. ■ Install diesel oxidation catalysts (DOC), catalyzed diesels particulate filters (CDPF) or other District approved emission reduction retrofit services (Required for projects grading more than 4.0 acres of continuously worked area). Section 6.4: Activitv Management Techniques ■ Develop a comprehensive construction activity management plan designed to minimize the amount of large construction equipment operating during any given time period. Schedule of construction truck trips during non -peak hours to reduce peak hour emissions. • Limit the length of the construction workday period, if necessary. ■ Phase construction activities, if appropriate. Section 6.5: Fugitive PM10 All of the following measures shall be included on grading, demolition and building plan notes: A. Reduce the amount of the disturbed area where possible. B. Use of water trucks or sprinkler systems in sufficient quantities to prevent airborne dust from leaving the site. Increased watering frequency would be required whenever wind speeds exceed 15 mph. Reclaimed (non -potable) water should be used whenever possible. C. All dirt stockpile areas should be sprayed daily as needed. D. Permanent dust control measures identified in the approved project re -vegetation and landscape plans should be implemented as soon as possible following completion of any soil disturbing activities. E. Exposed ground areas that are planned to be reworked at dates greater than one month after initial grading should be sown with a fast -germinating native grass seed and watered until vegetation is established. F. All disturbed soil areas not subject to re -vegetation should be stabilized using approved chemical soil binder, jute netting, or 03/01107 CUP 2004-0137.9700 ECRVND.revised.kg.d0c • 11 • CITY OF ATASCADERO INIT14L STUDY Exhibit A Timing Responsibility Mitigation !Monitoring Measure Mitigation Monitoring Program GP: Grading PerrNt PS Planning Services CUP 2004-0/37 - Amendment (Hotel and Zone Text BP:BuldmgPerrdt BS: BubmgServices T0: 7enw ary FD: Fue DeoarowV Change) Dccuparcy PD: Poire Depa mmi FI: Final mspecbm CE City Engineer FD: Final Dccwarmy v Wastewasr Ch City Atmmey 5700 El Camino Real AMWC:waterCorm. other methods approved in advance by the APCD. G. All roadways, driveways, sidewalks, etc, to be paved should be complete as soon as possible. In addition, building pads should be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used. H. Vehicle speed for all construction vehicles shall not exceed 15 mph on any unpaved surface at the construction site. 1. All trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials are to be covered or should maintain at least two feet of freeboard (minimum vertical distance between top of load and top of trailer) in accordance with CVC Section 23114. J. Install wheel washers where vehicles enter and exit unpaved roads onto streets, or wash off trucks and equipment leaving the site. K. Sweep streets at the end of each day if visible soil material is carried onto adjacent paved roads. Water sweepers with reclaimed water should be used where feasible. The contractor or builder shall designate a person or persons to monitor the dust control program and to order increased watering, as necessary, • to prevent transport of dust off site. The name and telephone number of such persons shall be provided to the APCD prior to land use clearance for map recordation and land use clearance for finish grading of any C� Mitigation Measure 4.e.1: Grading and excavation and grading work shall be consistent with the City of Atascadero Tree Ordinance. Special precautions when working around native trees include: 1. All existing trees outside of the limits of work shall remain. 2. Earthwork shall not exceed the limits of the project area. 3. Low branches in danger of being tom from trees shall be pruned prior to any heavy equipment work being done. 4. Vehicles and stockpiled material shall be stored outside the dripline of all trees. 5. All trees within the area of work shall be fenced for protection with 4 -foot chain link, snow or safety fencing placed per the approved tree protection plan. Tree protection fencing shall be in place prior to any site excavation or grading. Fencing shall remain in place until completion of all construction activities. 6. Any roots that are encountered during excavation shall be clean cut by hand and sealed with an approved tree seal. BP I PS Mitigation Measure 4.e.2: The developer shall contract with a certified BP arborist during all phases of project implementation. The certified arborists shall be responsible for monitoring the project during all phases of construction through project completion, as follows: (a) A written agreement between the arborist and the developer outlining a arborist monitoring schedule for each construction phase through final inspection shall be submitted to and approved by planning staff prior to the issuance of buildingigrading permits. 03/01/07 4.e.1 4.e.2 CUP 2004-0137.9700 ECR.MND.remsed.kg.doc M9 CITY OF ATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY Exhibit A Timing Responsibility Mitigation /Monitoring Measure Mitigation Monitoring Program CUP 2004-0'137 - Amendment (Hotel and Zone Text GP BP: Building Pemn Grading erni't PS: r�r�gse rnww 85: Building Sauces Change) T0: Taroaary Ommarxy FD: Fre Depanment PD: PokeDepar rent Fl: Final inspection OE. CilY Engineer 5700 EI Camino Real F0: Final Ckcupartry WW: Wastewater Coynt r ey nwc cArrip. aC MWC:k water (b) Arborist shall schedule a pre -construction meeting with engineering /planning staff, grading equipment operators, project superintendent to review the project conditions and requirements prior to any grubbing or earth work for any portion of the project site. All tree protection fencing and trunk protection shall be installed for inspection during the meeting. Tree protection fencing shall be installed at the line of encroachment into the tree's root zone area. (c) As specified by the arborist report and City staff: ■ Prune all trees in active development areas to be saved for structural strength and crown cleaning by a licensed and certified arborist. ■ Remove all debris and spoils from the lot cleaning and tree pruning. • In locations where paving is to occur within the tree canopy, grub only and do not grade or compact. Install porous pavers over a three-inch bed of 3/4 inch granite covered with one -inch pea gravel for screeding. If curbs are required, use pegged curbs to secure the porous pavers. Pegged curbs are reinforced six to eight curbs poured at grade with a one -foot by one -foot pothole every four to six linear feet. • All trenching or grading within the protected root zone area, outside of the tree protection fence shall require hand trenching or preserve and protect roots that are larger than 2 inches in diameter. • No grading or trenching is allowed within the fenced protected area. ■ Any roots that are 4 inches in diameter or larger are not to be cut until inspected and approved by the on-site arborist. (d) Upon project completion and prior to final occupancy a final status report shall be prepared by the project arborist certifying that the tree protection plan was implemented, the trees designated for protection were protected during construction, and the construction -related tree protection measures are no longer required for tree protection. Mitigation Measure 4.e.3: All tree removals shall be mitigated in GP, BP P5 4.e.3 accordance with the Atascadero native Tree Ordinance. Mitigation Measure 6.b.1: The grading permit application plans shall GP PS, BS, CE 61.1 include erosion control measures to prevent soil, dirt, and debris from entering the storm drain system during and after construction. A separate plan shall be submitted for this purpose and shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer at the time of Building Permit application. Mitigation Measure 6.c.1: A soils report shall be required to be BP, GP PS, BS, CE 6.c.1 submitted with a future building permit by the building department. 03101/07 • ' CUP 2004-0137.9700 ECRAND.revised.kg.doc • • • • CITY OFATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY Exhibit A Timing Responsibility Mitigation (Monitoring Measure Mitigation Monitoring Program CUP 2004-0137 - Amendment (Hotel and Zone Text GP Gredug Permtl BP: Wiling pemm PS: Planning Services BS: BUidogServices Change` TO: Temporery R21wemn FD: Fire Depemmenl PD: Police Depam erd F F0: W Ocaoancy CE: CyEngneer WW: Wasmwamr 9700 EI Camino Real CA: Cdy Aaomey AMWC:WamrConp. Mitigation Measure 8.e.f.1: The developer is responsible for ensuring GP PS, BS, CE 8.e.f.1 that all contractors are aware of all storm water quality measures and that such measures are implemented. Failure to comply with the EDDroved construction Best Management Practices will result in the issuarn of correction notices, citations, or stop orders. Mitigation Measure 11.d.1: All construction activities shall comply with BP, GP PS, BS, CE 11.d.1 the City of Atascadero Noise Ordinance for hours of operation. Mitigation Measure 15.a.b.1: Required fair share contributions to the BP, GP PS, CE 15.a.h.1 Santa Rosa / 101 interchange improvements (signal and associated improvements) for the hotel portion of the proposed project shall be as follows: 1. E. Front Street/ NB 101 On -Ramp Intersection: 17.5% 2. W. Front Street! SB 101 On -Ramp Intersection: 9.7% Fees due shall be required prior to, or currently with, issuance of building permits for the proposed hotel development. impacts from the proposed office complex are anticipated in the General Plan and no additional fair share payments will be required for the addition of office uses. Mitigation Measure 15.d.1: improvements to East Front shall include the BP, GP PS, CE 15.4.1 following: 1. The applicant shall use a Caltrans standard Slurry Seal on East F ront. 2. A City standard 423 driveway approach shall be used with a maximum width of 36'. 3. Painted median tapers that conform to the Caltrans Highway Design Manual, Section 400 design standards shall be installed. Deviations to the Caltrans standard shall be justified by the applicant and approved by the City Public Works Director. The southern median taper shall be located so that the taper starts near the southern property line. This will provide a longer left tum center lane for vehicles heading south on East Front Street. 4. All painted medians shall be marked with Caltrans standard thermal paint and appropriately colored. 5. A guardrail shall be installed in front of the power pole on East Front. Mitigation Measure 15.f.1: The maximum use intensities shall be as BP, GP PS, CE 15.f.1 follows: 1. 11,000 sf office 2. 1,400 sf retail/restaurant 3. 3,400 sf medical offices Any increases in parking demand or tum -over rates will require additional Parking analysis. If any additional impacts occur, subsequent environmental documentation will be required. 03101/07 CUP 2004-0137.9700 ECR.MND.revised.k9.doc 91 CITY OFATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY Exhibit A Timing Responsibility Mitigation /Monitoring Measure Mitigation Monitoring Program CUP 20040437 - Amendment (Hotel and Zone Text GP: Grading Permit i3PBuildrgPemvt PS: Piamw9 Serxm &S:B0WdVSwces T0: Teffwrery FD Fwe Dwarrrem Change) OccMawy PD: PoiceDeparrnerd FI: Fuel mpeMn CE City Erg neer F0: Frral Occupancy WW Wastewater EI Camino Real CkC9700 AMVJC: Water Comp. AMWC: ry TSTG Mitigation Measure 15.f.2: Shared parking shall be required throughout BP, GP PS, CE 15.f.2 the site. No reserved parking shall be permitted. 03101/07 92 CUP 2004-0137.9700 ECR.MND.revised.kg.doc • • • • CITY OFATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL. FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ❑ Aesthetics ❑ Biological Resources �l Hazards & Hazardous �— materials ❑ Mineral Resources ❑ Public Services Utilities / Service Systems ❑ ❑ Agriculture Resources ❑ Cultural Resources 0 Air Quality ❑ Geology /Soils ❑ Hydrology / Water Quality ❑ Land Use / Planning ❑ Noise On the basis of this initial evaluation: ❑ Recreation ❑ Population / Housing ❑ Transportation/Traffic ❑ Mandatory Findings of Significance ❑ I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ® I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant effect" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed -in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. ❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, inclu ing revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. • Associate CUP 2004-0137.9700 ECR.MND.revtsed.kg.d0C 03/01/07 93 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: CITY OF ATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a Lead Agency cites following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards (e.g. the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) "Potentially Significant Impact' is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact' entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact' to a "Less than Significant Impact." The Lead Agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses," may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). Earlier analyses are discussed in Section XVII at the end of the checklist. 6) Lead Agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references information sources for potential impacts (e.g. general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. A source list should be attached. Other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 03/01 /07 CUP 2004-0137.9700 ECR.MND.rev sed.k9.no-. 0 C7 • „y CITY OF ATASCADERO r INITIAL ST[IDY •Potentially Less Than Less Than No Initial Study 2007-0002 Significant Significant with Significant impact CUP 2004-0137 Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation 9700 EI Camino Real 1. AESTHETICS -- Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not ❑ ❑ ❑ limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? the visual character or ❑ ❑ ® ❑ c) Substantially degrade existing quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare that ❑ ® ❑ ❑ would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? SOURCES: Project Description; Project Plans; Planning Staff Site Visit. DISCUSSION: 1.a,b,c,d) The project site is not located within a scenic vista. Landscaping is provided along the EI Camino Real frontage and all parking areas are located at the center of the site. The proposed hotel is requesting a height exception to exceed the maximum allowed height for the commercial corridor. The proposed hotel building will be setback a minimum of 7 -feet from the pedestrian sidewalk allowing for minimal landscaping. The following mitigation measures have been identified to assure all potential impacts are mitigated to a level of • insignificance: Mitiaation Measure 1.c.1: The following landscape mitigations shall apply: The project landscaping shall include street trees along the EI Camino Real and East Frontage Road frontage placed a minimum of 30 feet on center or at locations complimentary to the architectural design of the proposed buildings, subject to staff approval. All proposed parking area trees shall be shade trees of 15 -gallon size and shall be double staked. Mitigation Measure 1.c.2. The proposed buildings shall include the use of paint and roof colors consistent with the architectural style as designed. The hotel building shall incorporate high quality brick veneer of a dark earth toned color as depicted on the attached elevation exhibit. The hotel building shall utilize darker earth toned accents and fapade colors, subject to staff approval. Awnings and/or similar accent features shall be included throughout the building fagade and along the lower floor level to enhance the architectural appearance of the building and mitigate the proposed additional height. Mitigation Measure 1.d.1: If exterior parking lot lighting is proposed, it shall be designed to eliminate any off site glare. All exteriorsite lights shall utilize full cut-off, "hooded” lighting fixtures to prevent offsite light spillage and glare. Any luminaire pole height shall not exceed 14 -feet in height, limit intensity to 2.0 foot candies at ingress/egress, and otherwise 0.6 foot candle minimum to 1.0 maximum within thesite. Fixtures shall be shield cut-off type and compatible with neighborhood setting, subject to staff app 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES: In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of • Conservation as an optional model to use in assessinq Page 16 03/01/07 CUP 2004-0137.9700 ECR.MND.revtsed.k9A= 95 Initial Study 2007-0002 CUP 2004-0137 9700 EI Camino Real impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural use? b Confect with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? L 17'1' OF ATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY Potentially Less Than Less Than No • Significant Significant with Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, El due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland. to non-agricultural use? SOURCES: Land Use Element EIR; DISCUSSION 2.a.) The property is not shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency as prime farmland. 2.b.) The property is not under a Williamson Act contract. 2.c.) The project will not result in the conversion of farmland to non-agricultural uses. 3. AIR QUALITY — The significance criteria established by the Air Quality Control District in its CEQA Guidelines may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable Z air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any IFNI criteria pollutant for which the project region is non - attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? SOURCES: Air Pollution Control District (APCD) CEQA Air Quality Handbook, Project Description -Photos; Project Plans. • DISCUSSION: 3.a.c.) This project will not affect or produce any significant air pollutants after completion of construction. Construction activities, including site grading may produce small quantities of air pollution, including dust and equipment exhaust. Any air quality impacts will be temporary and short term. 3.b.) Construction activities, including site grading may produce small quantities of air pollution, including dust and equipment exhaust. Any air quality impacts will be temporary and short term. • 3.d.) The construction of the subdivision and the associated on-site and public improvements will not concentrate 03/D1/07Page 17 CUP 2004-0137.9700 ECRAND.revisedlg.doc • Initial Study 2007-0002 CUP 2004-0137 9700 EI Camino Real CITY OF ATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant with Significant impact impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation pollutants. 3.e.) The construction of the commercial development and the associated on-site and public improvements will not create objectionable odors. Mitigation Measure 31.1: Naturally Occurring Asbestos (NOA) has been identified by the state Air Resources Board as a toxic air contaminant. Serpentine and ultramafic rocks are very common in the state and may contain naturally occurring asbestos. Under thz State Air Resources Board Air Toxics Control Measure (ATCM) for Construction, Grading, Quarrying, and Surface Mining Operations, prior to any grading activities at the site, the project proponent shall ensure that a geologic evaluation is conducted to determine if naturally occurring asbestos is present within the area that will be disturbed. If naturally occurring asbestos is found at the site the applicant must comply with all requirements outlined in the Asbestos ATCM for Construction, Grading, Quarrying, and Surface Mining Operations. These requirements may include but are not limited to 1) an Asbestos Dust Mitigation Plan which must be approved by the District before construction begins, and 2) an Asbestos Health and Safety Program will also be required for some projects. Mitigation Measure 3.b.2: The project shall be conditioned to comply with all applicable District regulations pertaining to the control of fugitive dust (PM -10) as contained in sections 6.3, 6.4 and 6.5 of the April 2003 Air Quality Handbook, Section 6.3: Construction Equipment ■ Maintain all construction equipment in proper tune according to manufacturer's specifications. ■ Fuel all off-road and portable diesel powered equipment, including but not limited to bulldozers, graders, cranes, loaders, scrapers, backhoes, generator sets, compressors, auxiliary power units, with ARB certified motor vehicle diesel fuel (Non -taxed version suitable for use off-road). ■ Maximize to the extent feasible, the use of diesel construction equipment meeting the ARB's 1996 or newer certification standard for off-road heavy-duty diesel engines. roved • Install diesel oxidation catalysts (DOC), catalyzed diesels particulate filters (CDPF) or other District app emission reduction retrofit services (Required for projects grading more than 4.0 acres of continuously worked area). Section 6.4: Activity Management Techniques • Develop a comprehensive construction activity management plan designed to minimize the amount of large construction equipment operating during any given time period. • Schedule of construction truck trips during non -peak hours to reduce peak hour emissions. ■ Limit the length of the construction workday period, if necessary. ■ Phase construction -activities, if appropriate. Section 6.5' Fugitive PM10 All of the following measures shall be included on grading, demolition and building plan notes: A. Reduce the amount of the disturbed area where possible. B. Use of water trucks or sprinkler systems in sufficient quantities to prevent airborne dust from leaving the site. Increased watering frequency would be required whenever wind speeds exceed 15 mph. Reclaimed (non - potable) water should be used whenever possible. C. All dirt stockpile areas should be sprayed daily as needed. D. Permanent dust control measures identified in the approved project re -vegetation and landscape plans should be implemented as soon as possible following completion of any soil disturbing activities. E. Exposed ground areas that are planned to be reworked at dates greater than one month after initial grading should be sown with a fast -germinating native grass seed and watered until vegetation is established. F.. All disturbed soil areas not subjectoed in should be b the APCDbilized using approved chemical soil binder, jute netting, or other methods app Y G. All roadways, driveways, sidewalks, etc, to be paved should be complete as soon as possible. In addition, building pads should be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used. H. Vehicle speed for all construction vehicles shall not exceed 15 mph on any unpaved surface at the construction site. Page 18 CUP 2004-0137.9700 E1,R.MND.re%ned.kg.d0c 03101/07 97 Initial Study 2007-0002 CUP 2004-0137 9700 EI Camino Real CITY OF ATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY Potentially Less Than Less Than No • Significant Significant with Significant Impact through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation I. All trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials are to be covered or should maintain at least two feet of freeboard (minimum vertical distance between top of load and top of trailer) in accordance with CVC Section 23114. J. install wheel washers where vehicles enter and exit unpaved roads onto streets, or was off trucks and equipment leaving the site. K. Sweep streets at the end of each day if visible soil material is carried onto adjacent paved roads. Water sweepers with reclaimed water should be used where feasible. L The contractor or builder shall designate a person or persons to monitor the dust control program and to order increased watering, as necessary, to prevent transport of dust off site. The name and telephone number of such persons shall be provided to the APCD prior to land use clearance for map recordation and land use clearance for finish grading of any structure. 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES — Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional pians, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting El biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? SOURCES: Project Description -Photos; Land Use Element EIR, Atascadero Tree Ordinance; Project Plans; Planning Staff Site Visit; DISCUSSION: 4.a.) No sensitive species have been found near the site. 4.b.) The project will not involve construction in a riparian habitat. 4.c.) There are no wetlands on the project site. 4.d.) The Land Use Element EIR concludes that development within the city limits will not have a significant impact on wildlife or wildlife corridors. 03101/07 W Page 19 CUP 2004-0137.8700 ECR.MND.revised.kg.doc CITY OF ATASCADERO ° 0-K INITIAL S7UDY • initial Study 2007-0002 Potentiallyignifnt Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant with Significant impact CUP 2004-0137 Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation 9700 EI Camino Real 4e.f.) The proposed project will not conflict with local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources nor will it conflict with any conservation plans. However, the presence of native trees on site requires that the following mitigation measures are implemented to ensure consistency with the Atascadero native Tree Ordinance: Mitigation Measure 4.e.1: Grading and excavation and grading work shall be consistent with the City of Atascadero Tree Ordinance. Special precautions when working around native trees include: 7. All existing trees outside of the limits of work shall remain. 8. Earthwork shall not exceed the limits of the project area. 9. Low branches in danger of being tom from trees shall be pruned prior to any heavy equipment work being done. 10. Vehicles and stockpiled material shall be stored outside the dripline of all trees. 11. All trees within the area of work shall be fenced for protection with 4 -foot chain link, snow or safety fencing placed per the approved tree protection plan. Tree protection fencing shall be in place prior to any site excavation or grading. Fencing shall remain in place until completion of all construction activities. 12. Any roots that are encountered during excavation shall be clean cut by hand and sealed with an approved tree seal. Mitigation Measure 4.e.2: The developer shall contract with a certified arborist during all phases of project implementation. The certified arborists shall be responsible for monitoring the project during all phases of construction through project completion, as follows: (a) A written agreement between the arborist and the developer outlining a arborist monitoring schedule for each construction phase through final inspection shall be submitted to and approved by planning staff prior to the issuance of building/grading permits. • (b) Arborist shall schedule a pre -construction meeting with engineering /planning staff, grading equipment operators, project superintendent to review the project conditions and requirements prior to any grubbing or earth work for any portion of the project site. All tree protection fencing and trunk protection shall be installed for inspection during the meeting. Tree protection fencing shall be installed at the line of encroachment into the tree's root zone area. (c) As specified by the arborist report and City staff: • Prune all trees in active development areas to be saved for structural strength and crown cleaning by a licensed and certified arborist; ■ Remove all debris and spoils from the lot cleaning and tree pruning. • nopy, grub only and do not grade or compact. Install In locations where paving is to occur within the tree ca porous pavers over a three-inch curbs to secure thete covered Wtporous pavers• Pegged cone-inchpurb 9 areere reinforced sixravl for gto If curbs are required, usee pegged curbs poured at grade with a one -foot by one -foot pothole every four to six linear feet. ■ All trenching or grading within the protected root zone area, outside of the tree protection fence shall require hand trenching or preserve and protect roots that are larger than 2 inches in diameter. ■ No grading or trenching is allowed within the fenced protected area. ■ Any roots that are 4 inches in diameter or larger are not to be cut until inspected and approved by the on-site arborist. (d) Upon project completion and prior to final occupancy a final status report shall be prepared by the project arborist certifying that the tree protection plan was implemented, the trees designated for protection were protected during construction, and the construction -related tree protection measures are no longer required for tree protection. Mitigation Measure 4.e.3: All tree removals shall be mitigated in accordance with the Atascadero native Tree Ordinance. (a 1 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES — Would the project: Page 20 03/01/07 CUP 2004-0137.9700 ECR.MND.revised.kg.doc • • Initial Stud 2007-0002 Potentially Study Significant CUP 2004-0137 Impact 9700 EI Camino Real a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in '15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to '15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? L= OF ATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY Less Than Less Than Significant with Significant Mitigation Impact incorporation ❑ ❑ ❑ IN] C No Impact SOURCES: Project Description -Photos; Planning Staff Site Visit; Land Use Element EIR; DISCUSSION: 5.a.b.c.d.) No known historical, archeological or cultural sites have been found or documented in the vicinity of the project. 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS — Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? iv) Landslides? b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? 03/01107 100 Page 21 ❑ ❑ ❑ is ❑ ❑ ❑ [127, is CUP 2004-0737.9700 ECR.MND.revised.kg.d0c • ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ CUP 2004-0737.9700 ECR.MND.revised.kg.d0c • • Initial Study 2007-0002 CUP 2004-0137 9700 EI Camino Real CITY OF ATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY Potentialiy Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant with Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation SOURCES: Project Description -Photos; Planning Staff Site Visit; Land Use Element EIR, Project Description -Photos; Project Plans. DISCUSSION: 6.a.) The project is not located on any known earthquake faults. 6.b.) Construction activities on the site will be required to comply with sedimentation and erosion control measures prescribed by the city engineer. 6.c.d.e.1 Soil conditions will be reviewed during building permit review in accordance with the municipal code. The bui6nq pians will be required to follow the recommendations of the soils report to assure safety for residents and buildings. The property contains no unusual geological formations. Project will connect to City sewer. Mitigation Measure 6.b.1: The grading permit application plans shall include erosion control measures to prevent soil, dirt, and debris from entering the storm drain system during and after construction. A separate plan shall be submitted for this purpose and shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer at the time of Building Permit application. Mitigation Measure f.c.1: A soils report shall be required to be submitted with a future building permit by the building department. 7. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS — Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal • of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one- quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan area or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people living or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people living or working in the project area? interfere with an g) Impair implementation of or physically adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where Page 22 CUP 2004-0137.9700 ECR.MND.revised.kg.doc 03/01107 101 Initial Study 2007-0002 CUP 2004-0137 9700 EI Camino Real wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? CTTY OFATASCADERO INITIAL S7UDY Potentially Less Than Less Than No • Significant Significant with Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation SOURCES: Project description, General Plan Land Use Element; Planning Staff Site Visit; DISCUSSION 7a.b.c.) The project is not anticipated to generate or involve use of significant amounts of hazardous materials. There are no known hazardous materials on the site or nearby. 7.d.) The property is not a listed hazardous material site. e.f.) The property is not near an airport. 7g.h.) The site is within the Fire Department's five-minute or less response area. 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY — Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of previously -existing nearby wells would drop to a level that would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner that would result in flooding on- or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? ® E g) Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures that would impede or redirect flood flows? I) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, 17 injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? 17 03/01/07 Page 23 CUP 2004-0137.9700 ECR.MND.revised.kg.doc 102 • • initial Study 2007-0002 CUP 2004-0137 9700 EI Camino Real CITY OFATASCADERO INI L4L STUDY Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant with Significant impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation SOURCES: Project description, Flood Insurance Rate Map 060700 0004 B (1/20/82); Project Plans; Planning Staff Site Visit; DISCUSSION: Ba.) The construction will not violate water quality standards. Bb.) The project will not deplete ground water supplies. Water will be provided by Atascadero Mutual Water Company. 8c.d.e.f.) The project will not alter any drainage course. Construction activities are subject to review for compliance w&I Cltk, drainage and grading regulations. Drainage will not be permitted to create or intensify any hazards for persons or property in the vicinity. 8.g.h.i.) Future residential uses will be outside of the 100 -year flood hazard area. 81j.) The project area is not subject to innundation by a tsunami. Mitigation Measure 8.e.f.1: The developer is responsible for ensuring that all contractors are aware of all storm water quality measures and that such measures are implemented. Failure to comply with the approved construction Best Management Practices will result in the issuance of correction notices, citations, or stop orders. 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING - Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the b_) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project •(including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, adopted for the • plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Page 24 local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? 03101/07 c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or El El Elnatural community conservation plan? SOURCES: Land Use Element, Circulation Element, project description, Land Use Element EIR; Project Pians. DISCUSSION: 9.a.) The project will not physically divide an established community. The new commercial (office building and Hotel) development in the proposed location is consistent and compatible with the adjacent commercial areas. In addition to the proposed new development, the applicant is proposing a Zone Text Amendment to allow health care services in the Commercial Tourist Zone. This use has an increased parking requirement and will generate a minor increase in traffic. Traffic and parking related impacts are discussed below in section 15. The proposed Zone Text Amendment and commercial development, including the construction of an 80 -room hotel, is consistent with the General Plan and compatible with existing and future surrounding uses. 9.b.) The proposed development is consistent with the City's General Plan Land Use and Housing elements. The proposed Zone Text Amendment is consistent with the City's General Pian. 9.c.) The project is consistent with the open space and conservation policies identified in the General Plan. 10 MINERAL RESOURCES —Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general • plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Page 24 CUP 20040137.9700 ECR.MND.rvAsed.kg.doc 03101/07 103 L.ITY OF ATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY initial Stud 2UU7-0002 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Study Significant Significant with Significant impact CUP 2004-0137 Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation 9700 EI Camino Real SOURCES: Project Description -Photos; Planning Staff Site Visit. DISCUSSION: 10.a.b.) No mining is proposed as a part of this project. No known mineral resources have been identified in the area. 11. NOISE — Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in 71 excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive 0 ground-bome vibration or ground -borne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels 17 in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, 117 where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would 17 the project expose people living or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? SOURCES: Project description, Noise Element, Noise Ordinance, Acoustical Design Manual; DISCUSSION: 11a.b.c.d.) Construction is expected to involve some heavy machinery and use of impact tools that make noise. Noise levels on the site are thus expected to be raised temporarily. The future residential use is not expected to generate unacceptable levels of noise to future adjacent commercial, public, or residential uses. 11.e.f.) The project is not located within an airport land use plan or private airstrip. Mitigation Measure 11.d.1: All construction activities shall comply with the City of Atascadero Noise Ordinance for hours of operation. 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING — Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? 03/01/07 Page 25 CUP 2004-0137.9700 ECR.MND.revised.kg.00c 104 0 • • initial Study 2007-0002 CUP 2004-0137 • • 9700 EI Camino Real CITY OFATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY Potentially Less Than Less Than Significant Significant with Significant Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the ❑ ❑ ❑ construction of replacement housing elsewhere? SOURCES: Project description, General Plan Land Use Element; No Impact DISCUSSION: 12.a,b,c. The General Plan identifies this site as commercial tourist. The development is an infill commercial project located along EI Camino Real where necessary facilities currently exist. The site is currently being developed with a 5.G scuare-foot office building and no housing or persons will be displaced. 13. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? ❑ ❑ ❑ Police protection? ❑ ❑ ❑ Schools? ❑ ❑ ❑ Parks? F7 ❑ ❑ Other public facilities? ❑ ❑ ❑ Z. SOURCES: Project description, Land Use Element EIR; DISCUSSION: Development Impact Fees: Development Impact Fees will be required of any new project for which a building permit is issued. The concept of the impact fee program is to fund and sustain improvements which are needed as a result of new development as stated in the General Plan and other policy documents within the fee program. Development Impact Fees fall into the following categories: Drainage Fees; Streets, Road, Bridge Fees; Sewer Fees; Public Safety Fees; and Park Fees, Miscellaneous Fees. The amount of impact fees to be paid will be determined at the time of issuance of building permit. Fire and Police: Impact fees are charged for new development, to help pay the cost of providing new facilities to serve the expanding city. The Fire Department of the City of Atascadero has indicated that it will be able to adequately service the proposed project. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Fire Department. The City of Atascadero Police Department has also indicated that the proposed project poses no problems to the police to adequately service it. Other public facilities: facilities. 14. RECREATION — 03/01/07 The construction of the project is not expected to have significant impacts on any other public Page 26 CUP 2004-0137.9700 EMIAND.revised1g.doc 105 - r L:= OF ATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY initial Stud 2007-0002 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Study • Significant Significant with Significant impact CUP 2004-0137 impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation 9700 EI Camino Real a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require F-1 D E the construction or expansion of recreational facilities that might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? SOURCES: Project description, Parks and Recreation Element; DISCUSSION: 14.a.) The proposed development will not increase demand on existing recreational facilities. 14.b.) The project does not involve construction of recreational facilities. 15. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC — Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic that is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of E ® ❑ El service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either 117 an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature F7 F\7 (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access?7 IL/7 f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs D 7/1 supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? SOURCES: Land Use Element, Circulation Element; Project Plans, Traffic and parking Analysis. DISCUSSION: 15a.b.) The Circulation Element (CE) anticipates an increase in new development in this area. The addition of an 80 - room hotel and proposed medical office facilities will impact the surrounding street system. Steve Orosz of Orosz Engineering Group prepared and Parking and Traffic Analysis and recommended mitigation measures be implemented to reduce the level of impact to insignificant. Mitigation measures are listed below. 15.c.) No changes will occur to the air traffic patterns. 15.d.) The project's access has adequate site distance onto EI Camino Real and East Front Rd, However, the configuration of East Front Rd with two travel lanes and one tum lane will require specific improvements as outlined below to mitigate conflicting tum movements and improve the functionality of the access point onto the site. 03/01l07 Page 27 CUP 2004-0137.9700 ECR.MND.re%nsed.kg.doc 106 • Initial Study 2007-0002 CUP 2004-0137 9700 EI Camino Real CITY OFATASCADERO INTITAL STUDY Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant with Significant impact Impact Mitigation Impact incorporation 15.e.) The project will have adequate emergency access from EI Camino Real and East Front Rd. 15.f.) The Traffic and Parking analysis prepared by Steve Orosz states that, based on a shared parking configuration, the proposed project wil provide adequate parking for all uses on site. 15.g.) The project does not conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation. Mitigation Measure 15.a.b.1: Required fair share contributions to the Santa Rosa / 101 interchange improvements (signal and associated improvements) for the hotel portion of the proposed project shall be as follows: 1 E. Front Street I NB 101 On -Ramp Intersection: 17.5% W. Front Street I SB 101 On -Ramp Intersection: 9.7% Fees due shall be required prior to, or currently with, issuance of building permits for the proposed hotel development. Impacts from the proposed office complex are anticipated in the General Plan and no additional fair share payments will be required for the addition of office uses. Mitigation Measure 15.d.1: improvements to East Front shall include the following: 1. The applicant shall use a Caltrans standard Slurry Seal on East Front. 2. A City standard 423 driveway approach shall be used with a maximum width of 36'. 3. Painted median tapers that conform to the Caltrans Highway Design Manual, Section 40D design standards shall be installed. Deviations to the Caltrans standard shall be justified by the applicant and approved by the City Public Works Director. The southern median taper shall be located so that the taper starts near the southern property line. This will provide a longer left tum center lane for vehicles heading south on East Front Street. 4. All painted medians shall be marked with Caltrans standard thermal paint and appropriately colored. 5. A guardrail shall be installed in front of the power pole on East Front. • Mitigation Measure 15.f.1: The maximum use intensities shall be as follows: 1. 11,000 sf office 2. 1,400 sf retaillrestaurant 3. 3,400 sf medical offices Any increases in parking demand or tum -over rates will require additional Parking analysis. If any additional impacts occur, subsequent environmental documentation will be required. Mitigation Measure 15.f.2: Shared parking shall be required throughout the site. No reserved parking shall be permitted. 107 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS —Would the project a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or ZZI wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water El drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the El 17,71 LLNJI • project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new Page 28 CUP 2004-0137.9700 ECR.MND.revised.k9.doc 03/01/07 107 CITY OF ATASCADERO ash INITIAL STUDY Initial Stud 2007-0002 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Study • Significant Significant with Significant Impact CUP 2004-0137 Impact Mitigation impact Incorporation 9700 EI Camino Real or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider that serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to Z accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? SOURCES: Project description, Land Use Element (LUE) EIR; Project Plans. DISCUSSION: Water. The Atascadero Mutual Water Company (AMW C) will provide water. All property within the city limits is entitled to water from the AMW C. The project is not expected to require significant quantities of water for the proposed uses. Water is pumped from two portions of the largest underground basin in the county, the Paso Robles Formation, using a series of shallow and deep wells. The water company anticipates that it will be able to meet the city's needs through buildout and beyond: Water demand at buildout under the LUE is estimated at about 6,500 acre-feet per year (AFY). The total available groundwater supply greatly exceeds demand, according to the findings of the Long -Term Viability of Water study. However, the water company does not currently have the deep wells needed to tap into the total amount needed at buildout. The water company is currently developing plans for installing wells where they will be most effective and will not conflict with water rights of others. According to the Water Company, development of additional wells is expected to keep pace with construction in the city, so that water supply will not be interrupted. Sewer. Sewer discharge will be handled by an on City sewer connection. Storm Water. On-site storm water will be detained and released at historic rates to EI Camino Real and East Frontage Road. The grading and drainage plan has been reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and is compliant with all City standards and codes. 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE — a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects that will 03/01/07 Page 29 CUP 2004-0137.9700 ECR.MND.revised.k9.dcc m • • • initial Study 2007-0002 CUP 2004-0137 9700 EI Camino Real • • CITY OFATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant with Significant Impact Impact Mitigation impact incorporation rL7 -7 cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? DISCUSSION: The proposed project consists of an application for an Commercial Development to include on 15,000 square -foot office building currently under construction and a proposed 80 -room hotel located along EI Camino Real and east Frontage road. In addition, the applicant is proposing a Zone Text Amendment to allow health care services within the Commercial Tourist Zone. The site has been reviewed and analyzed for all develooment related impacts and a Traffic and parking Study has been submitted and accepted dealing with all imoacts related to such from the current proposal. SOURCES: General Plan Land Use Element, City of Atascadero, 2002 Zoning Ordinance, part of Municipal Code, City of Atascadero, as amended through 1999. Land Use Element Environmental Impact Report, Crawford, Multari, & Clark, adopted 2002 CEQA Handbook, Air Quality Control District, August 1995 General Pian Safety Element, City of Atascadero, 2002 General Plan Circulation Element, 2002 General Pian Noise Element, adopted 2002 Acoustical Design Manual, Brown-Buntin Associates, 1991 Noise Ordinance, City of Atascadero, 1992 Guide for Developers, Atascadero Fire Department, 1998 draft Flood Insurance Rate Map, community -panel number 060700 0004 B, Federal Emergency Management Agency, January 20, 1982 Trip Generation, Institute of Traffic Engineers PROJECT -SPECIFIC SOURCES: Project description includes the following: General ■ Grading and Drainage Pian, Eric Gobler ■ Traffic and Parking analysis, Steve Orosz (April 19, 2006; Addendum February 26, 2006) ■ Landscape Plan, Madrone Landscaping Office Building Plans ■ Site Plan Plan; LGA ■ Elevations and Floor Plans„ LGA Hotel Plans ■ Elevations, Vitae architects • Site Plan, Vitae Architects 031D1/07 Page 30 CUP 2004-0137.9700 ECR.MND.revised.kg.doc 109 ATTACHMENT 3: Draft Resolution A DRAFT RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING PROPOSED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION 2007-0002 PREPARED FOR CUP 2004-0037 AMENDMENTS ON APN 056-081-032 (9700 El Camino Real — Patel / Jacobson) WHEREAS, an application has been received from JP Patel (3600 El Camino Real, Atascadero, CA 93422) Applicant and Ted Jacobson (8055 Cristobal Avenue, Atascadero, Ca 93422) Applicant and Property Owner to consider an amendment to CUP 2004-0137 to modify the Master plan of Development to establish an 80 -room hotel and establish 3,400 square -feet of health care services use within the office portion of the development, and an application for a Zone Text Amendment to add "health care services" as a conditional use in the Commercial Tourist (CT) zone; and, • WHEREAS, an Initial Study and Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration 2007-0002 were prepared for the project and made available for public review in accordance with the • requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero held a public hearing on April 3, 2007 following the close of the review period to consider the Initial Study and Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that the project will have no significant impacts with project specific mitigation measures incorporated; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Atascadero held a public hearing on May 8, 2007, following the close of the review period, to consider the Initial Study and Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration; and, NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Atascadero, hereby resolves to certify Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration 2007-0002 based on the following Findings, and as shown in Exhibit A: 1. The Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration has been completed in compliance with CEQA; and, 110 • 2. The Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was presented to the Planning • Commission, and the information contained therein was considered by the Planning Commission, prior to recommending action on the project for which it was prepared; and, 3. The project does not have the potential to degrade the environment when mitigation measures are incorporated into the project; and, 4. The project will not achieve short-term to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals; and, 5. The project does not have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively cc siderable; and, 6. The project will not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings either directly or indirectly; and, On motion by Council Member and seconded by Council Member , the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ADOPTED: CITY OF ATASCADERO By: Dr. George Luna, Mayor ATTEST: Marcia McClure Torgerson, C.M.C., City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Patrick L. Enright, City Attorney • 111 CITY OF ATASCADER0 PROPOSED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION #2007-0002 6907 El Camino Real Atascadero, CA 93422 805/461-5000 Owners/ Ted Jacobsen, 8055 Cristobal, Atascadero, CA 93422 App'U cants: JP Patel, 3600 El Camino Real, Atascadero, CA 93422 Project Title: Conditional Use Permit 2004-0137 Amendment Project 9700 El Camino Real, Atascadero, Ca. 93422 Location: APN 056-081-032 Project The proposed project consists of an application for a Conditional Use Permit for a commercial Description: development located on 1.7 acres within the Commercial Tourist Zone and a Zone Text Amendment to the conditionally allowed uses within the Commercial Tourist Zone to allow health care services/medical offices. Two building pads are proposed for the site. Building 1, a 15,000 square - foot office building is currently under construction. This building is currently proposed to house the medical offices. Building 2 is proposed to be an 80 room hotel totaling 51,740 square -feet. Four native oak trees are proposed for removal. Mitigated Negative Declaration 2005-0022 was previously certified for the construction of the office building. This document shall analyze all existing and new impacts due to the proposed amendments and shall supersede the previously certified document. Genera] Plan Designation: General Commercial (GC) Zoning District: Commercial Tourist (CT) Findings: 1. The project does not have the potential to degrade the environment. 2. The project will not achieve short-term to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals. 3. The project does not have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable. 4. The project will not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings either directly or indirectly. Determination: Based on the above findings, and the information contained in the initial study 2005-0022 (made a part hereof by reference and on file in the Community Development Department), it has been determined that the above project will not have an adverse impact on the environment when the following proposed mitigation measures are incorporated into the project (see attachment). Prepared By: Belly Gleason, Associate Planner Date Posted: March 5, 2007 Public Review Ends: April 3, 2007 Attachments: - Location Map - Site Plan - Floor Plans — Office building currently under construction - Proposed Hotel Plans - Traffic and Parking Study Fik: NP 20116-0177.97(0 ECR MND.— ak,A. Print Dnc 0711IM71126 AM 112 6907 EL CAMINO REAL • ATASCADERO, CA 93422 - (805) 461-5000 • FAX 461-7612 • • • • ATTACHMENT 4: Draft Resolution B - Hotel DRAFT RESOLUTION B RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2004-0137 AMENDMENT TO APPROVE AN 80 -ROOM HOTEL LOCATED AT APN 056-081-032 (9700 El Camino Real — Patel / Jacobson) WHEREAS, an application has been received from JP Patel (3600 El Camino Real, Atascadero, CA 93422) Applicant and Ted Jacobson (8055 Cristobal Avenue, Atascadero, CA 93422) Property Owner to consider an amendment to Master Plan of Development (CUP 2004- 0137) to establish an 80 -room hotel; and, and, WHEREAS, the site's current General Plan Designation is General Commercial (GC); WHEREAS, the site's current zoning is Commercial Tourist (CT); and, . WHEREAS, an Initial Study and Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration 2007-0002 were prepared for the project and made available for public review in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and, WHEREAS, the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and public notice of environmental documents, as set forth in the State and local guidelines for implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) have been adhered to; and, WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed Public Hearing upon the subject Conditional Use Permit Amendment application was held by the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero at which hearing evidence, oral and documentary, was admitted on behalf of said Master Plan of Development; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, at a duly noticed Public Hearing held on April 3, 2007, studied and considered the Conditional Use Permit 2004- 0137 Amendment (Master Plan of Development), after first studying and considering the Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project, and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Atascadero, at a duly noticed Public Hearing held on May 8, 2007, studied and considered Conditional Use Permit 2004-0137 Amendment (Master Plan of Development), after first studying and considering the Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project, and, U 113 NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Atascadero takes the following actions: • SECTION 1. Findings for approval of Conditional Use Permit Amendment. The City Council finds as follows: 1. The proposed project or use is consistent with the General Plan and the City's Appearance Review Manual; and, 2. The proposed project or use satisfies all applicable provisions of the Title (Zoning Ordinance); and, 3. The establishment, and subsequent operation or conduct of the use will not, because of the circumstances and conditions applied in the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of the general public or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the use, or be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity of the use; and, 4. That the proposed project or use will not be inconsistent with the character or the immediate neighborhood or contrary to its orderly development; and, 5. That the proposed use or project will not generate a volume of traffic beyond the safe capacity of all roads providing access to the project, either existing or to be improved in conjunction with the project, or beyond the normal traffic volume of the surrounding neighborhood that would result from full development in accordance with the Land Use Element. • SECTION 2. Findings for shared on-site and peak -hour parking reduction. The City Council finds as follows: The characteristics of a use or its immediate vicinity do not necessitate the number of parking spaces, type of design, or improvements required by this title and that reduced parking will be adequate to accommodate on the site all parking needs generated by the use SECTION 3. Findings for Approval of Tree Removal Permit. The City Council finds as follows: The tree is obstructing proposed improvements that cannot be reasonably designed to avoid the need for tree removal, as certified by a report from the Site Planner and determined by the Community Development Department based on the following factors: ■ Early consultation with the City; ■ Consideration of practical design alternatives; ■ Provision of cost comparisons (from applicant) for practical design alternatives; ■ If saving tree eliminates all reasonable uses of the property; or • 114 ■ If saving the tree requires the removal of more desirable trees. • SECTION 3. Findings for approval of Height Exception. The City Council finds as follows: 1. The proposed project will not result in substantial detrimental effects on the enjoyment and use of adjoining properties; and, 2. The modified height will not exceed the lifesaving equipment capabilities of the Fire Department. �,CTION 4. Approval. The City Council of the City of Atascadero, in a regular session assembled on May 8, 2007, resolved to approve Conditional Use Permit 2004-0137 Amendment (Master Plan of Development) subject to the following: EXHIBIT A: Conditions of Approval EXHIBIT B: Master Plan of Development/Site Plan EXHIBIT C: Elevations EXHIBIT D: Landscape Plan EXHIBIT E: Color and Materials Board EXHIBIT F: Grading and Drainage Plan EXHIBIT G: Hotel Site Sections • • 115 On motion by Council Member and seconded by Council Member , the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote: 0 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ADOPTED: CITY OF ATASCADERO By: Dr. George Luna, Mayor ATTEST: Marcia McClure Torgerson, C.M.C., City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Patrick L. Enright, City Attorney 116 • • C, EXHIBIT A: Conditions of Approval / Mitigation Monitoring Program Master Plan of Development Amendment (CUP 2004-0137) - Hotel Conditions of Approval / Timing Responsibility Mitigation /Monitoring Measure Mitigation Monitoring Program PS: Planning Sertices BL Business BS: Building Senvices 9700 E/ Camino Real License GP: Grading FD: Re Departiment PD: Police Departrnent Master Plan of Development Amendment Permit CE: City Engineer BP: Building WW: Wastewater CUP 2004-0137 - Hotel Permit CA CityAbrney FI: Final Inspection TO: Temporary Occupancy F0: Final Occupancy Planning Services 1. This conditional use permit shall be for an 80 -room hotel located on FM PS parcel 056-081-032 regardless of owner. All site development for the office portion of the development shall remain under the previous approval and all conditions of the previous approval shall apply unless specifically amended by this resolution. 2. The approval of this use permit shall become final and effective for the FM PS purposes of issuing building permits fourteen (14) days following the Planning Commission approval unless prior to the time, an appeal to the decision is filed as set forth in Section 9-1.111(b) of the Zoning Ordinance. 3. The Community Development Department shall have the authority to BP/FM PS, CE approve the following minor changes to the project that (1) modify the site plan project by less than 10%, (2) result in a superior site design or appearance, and/or (3) address a construction design issue that is not substantive to the Master Plan of Development. The Planning Commission shall have the final authority to approve any other changes to the Master Plan of Development and any associated Tentative Maps unless appealed to the City Council. 4. Approval of this Conditional Use Permit shall be valid for twelve (12) BP/FM PS months after its effective date. At the end of the period, the approval shall expire and become null and void unless the project has received a building permit. 5. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Ongoing Atascadero or its agents, officers, and employees against any claim or action brought to challenge an approval by the city, or any of its entities, concerning the subdivision. 6. All subsequent Tentative Map and construction permits shall be BP / FM PS, CE consistent with the Master Plan of Development contained herein. 7. All exterior elevations, finish materials, and colors shall be consistent BP PS with the Master Plan of Development as shown in EXHIBIT B, C, D and E with the following modifications: 117 Conditions of Approval / Timing Responsibility Mitigation /Monitoring Measure Mitigation Monitoring Program PS: Planni g Services BL Business BS: Builtirg Seryces 9700 E/ Camino Rea/ License GP: Grading FD: Fire Depaitnent PD: Police Deparbnent Master Plan of Development Amendment Pemtt CE: City Engineer BP: Building WW: Waslaxaler CUP 20040137 - Hotel Peron rXCAy y FI: Final Inspwbon T0: Temporary Occupancy F0: Final OCCwWCy ■ All exterior material finishes shall be durable, high quality, and consistent with the architectural appearance. • All trash storage, recycle storage, and air conditioning units shall be screened from view behind architecturally compatible or landscaped enclosures; ■ Any exterior light fixtures shall be compatible with building design, subject to staff approval. • All colors shall be as depicted on the attached EXHIBIT E. ■ Brick veneer shall be "Sienna Slate" and 'Tumbleweed". 8. All site work, grading, and site improvements shall be consistent with the BP/FM PS, BS, CE Master Plan of Development as shown in EXHIBIT C, F, and G and shall include the following: ■ Parking stalls under the dripline of the existing 70" oak tree shall be at current grade and shall be constructed of turf block back filled with gravel. No excavation below existing grade shall occur without the approval of the project arborist. • Pavers and/or colored, stamped concrete shall be installed per exhibit B. 9. A final landscape and irrigation plan shall be approved prior to the BP PS, BS issuance of building permits and included as part of site improvement plan consistent with EXHIBIT D, and as follows: ■ All exterior meters, air conditioning units and mechanical equipment shall be screened with landscape material. ■ All areas shown on the site plan not identified for a specific use shall be landscaped by the developer prior to the final of any single building permit on-site. • Street trees shall be provided at a maximum of 30 -feet on center within the East Front parkway with the exception of the area beneath the dripline of the existing oak tree. Should the oak tree require removal, additional street trees shall be required at the above stated interval. ■ All trees shall be a minimum 1.5" diameter at breast height including 118 • C: • • • Conditions of Approval ! Timing Responsibility Mitigation /Monitoring Measure Mitigation Monitoring Program PS: Planning Services BL: Business BS: Building Sere ces 9700 E/ Camino Real License GP: Grading FD: Fini Department PD: Police Department Master Plan of Development Amendment Penna CE: City Engineer BP: Building WW: Wastewater CUP 2004-0137 - Hotel Penna ca Cayntro<ney FI: Final Inspection TO: Temporary Occupancy F0: Final Occupancy parkway trees. '.4. All native tree removals shall be mitigated for in accordance with the BP PS Atascadero Native Tree Ordinance. A mitigation deposit shall be required for the existing 70" oak to remain for a minimum period of 18 months after the completion of the project. 11. The developer and/or subsequent owner shall assume responsibility for GP PS the continued maintenance of all landscape and common areas, BP consistent with EXHIBIT C and D. 12. All center signage shall be compatible with the building architecture and BP PS design theme. ■ A maximum of 98 square -feet shall be permitted for the signage facing the parking lot and post office (front and rear of the building). ■ A maximum of 52 square -feet shall be permitted for signage facing East Front Road and the office building (sides). • The monument sign shall be redesigned to incorporate materials and colors compatible with the proposed building. The base of the sign shall utilize brick veneer consistent with the building facade. ■ Any change in signage shall require Planning Commission review and approval. 13. All pole lighting shall be decorative in nature per the existing CUP approval and shall be no higher than 14 -feet. Office Building Amendments 14, A retaining wall shall be permitted along the EI Camino Real frontage, subject to the following: • The wall shall be stucco textured to match the office building • The wall shall be a maximum of 4 -feet in height. • The wall shall be placed at the end of the parking stalls to retain the 8 -foot landscape planter at sidewalk level. • In addition to the required street trees, a revised landscape plan will be required that includes larger shrubs and vines to screen parked vehicles. 119 Conditions of Approval / Timing Responsibility Mitigation /Monitoring Measure Mitigation Monitoring Program PS: Planning Services BL Business BS: Building Servos 9700 E/ Camino Rea/ I. PIre GP: Grading FO: Fire Departrneol P0: Police Depatnent Master Plan of Development Amendment Perrin CE: CilyEnginaw BP: Building WW: Wastewater CUP 2004-0137 - Hotel Permit CaCtiyAWM FI: Final Inspection TO:Tenwrary Occupancy FO: Final Ocagancy 15. The health care service use shall include a building alarm system to BP BS ensure that he tenant space remains secure. 16. A minimum of 2 bike racks shall be provided: 1 at the office building site, BP PS 1 at the hotel site. City Engineer Project Conditions 4-9-17. Applicant shall slurry seal project frontage, along East Front GP, BP CE Street, from property line to property line. Slurry seal shall slurry seal entire width of frontage. A line extended perpendicular to the centerline of East Front Street, from the Northwest property comer, constitutes station 12+64 at the centerline of East Front Street. 4918. Applicant shall install commercial driveway approach per GP, BP CE Caltrans Standard A87; from stations 12+86 to 13+10 20:19. Applicant shall remove and replace concrete curb gutter and GP, BP CE sidewalk that does not meet City Engineering Standards. All broken, offset, displaced and degraded sidewalk along the frontage shall be removed and replaced 24-.20. Applicant shall install Caltrans standard guard rail A77A GP, BP CE starting at station 13+71 and ending at 13+96 to protect the PG&E pole next to the southbound traffic lane 19.AppliGant shall Wipe tum laRe 9121 East FmFeRt StFeet 13+97, begin taper at lstatieR 4 3-697 and end tapeF at GtatiGR 14 =125-6. 6P, 13R (o€ x3:21. Applicant shall paint the curb red along the entire property GP, BP CE frontage per direction of City Engineer nc� GE City Engineer Standard Conditions 120 • • • • Conditions of Approval / Timing Responsibility Mitigation /Monitoring Measure Mitigation Monitoring Program PS: Planning Services BL: Business BS: Building Services 9700 El Camino Rea/ License GP: Grading FD: Fie Depetmnt partm PD: Police Department Master Plan of Development Amendment Pearn CE: CO Engineer BP: Building WW: Wastewater CUP 2004-0137 - Hotel Pena CA. CgAttomey FI: Final Inspechon TO: Temporary Occupancy F0: Final Occupancy 2-5-.22. An engineers estimate of probable cost shall be submitted GP, BP CE for review and approval by the City Engineer to determine the amount of the bonds required prior to issuance of building permits. 2-6-.23. A six (6) foot Public Utility Easement (PUE) shall be GP, BP CE provided contiguous to the property frontage and shall be recorded in a separate document prior to issuance of building permit. X24. The applicant shall acquire title interest in any off-site land GP, BP CE that may be required to allow for the construction of the improvements. The applicant shall bear all costs associated with the necessary acquisitions. The applicant shall also gain concurrence from all adjacent property owners whose ingress and egress is affected by these improvements. 2-8-25. Slope easements shall be obtained by the applicant as GP, BP CE needed to accommodate cut or fill slopes. 2-9-.26. Drainage easements shall be obtained by the applicant as GP, BP CE needed to accommodate both public and private drainage facilities. 38:27. Prior to the issuance of building permits the applicant shall GP, BP CE submit plans and supporting calculations/reports including street improvements, underground utilities, composite utilities, and grading/drainage plans prepared by a registered civil engineer for review and approval by the City Engineer. 3428. Submit calculations to support the design of any structures GP, BP CE or pipes. Closed conduits shall be designed to convey the 10 -year flow with gravity flow, the 25 -year flow with head, and provide safe conveyance for the 100 -year overflow. 329. Provide for the detention and metering out of developed GP, BP CE storm runoff so that it is equal to or less than undeveloped storm runoff. 33.30. Drainage basins shall be designed to desilt, detain and GP, BP CE meter storm flows as well as release them to natural runoff locations. 34.31. Show the method of dispersal at all pipe outlets. Include GP, BP CE specifications for size & type. 38:32. Show method of conduct to approved off-site drainage GP, BP CE facilities. 121 Conditions of Approval / Timing Responsibility Mitigation Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure PS: Planning Services BL: Business BS: Building Services 9700 E/ Camino Real License FD: Fire Deparlrnent Master Plan of Development Amendment GP: Grading Permit PD: Police Deparbnent CE: CAy Engineer CUP 2004-0137 - Hotel BP: Building Permit WW: Wastewater CA: City Mornay FI: Final Inspection T0: Tempway Occupancy F0: Final Occupancy 36:33. Concentrated drainage from off-site areas shall be conveyed GP, BP CE across the project site in drainage easements. Acquire drainage easements where needed. Drainage shall cross lot lines only where a drainage easement has been provided. If drainage easement cannot be obtained the storm water release must follow the exact historic path, rate and velocity as prior to the subdivision. 334. All public improvements shall be constructed in conformance GP, BP CE with the City of Atascadero Engineering Department Standard Specifications and Drawings or as directed by the City Engineer 33:35. Project shall include construction of curb, gutter and GP, BP CE sidewalk along entire frontage. 39:36. Alignment of frontage improvements shall be approved by GP, BP CE the City Engineer. 4037. All utilities shall be undergrounded on project frontage GP, BP CE 44-38. All onsite sewer mains shall be privately owned and FM CE maintained. 439. Applicant shall pay sewer extension (Annexation), BP CE Connection and Reimbursement fees (if applicable) upon issuance of building permit. 43:40. Gravity sewer mains within the subdivision shall be eight (8) BP CE inches in diameter. 44-41. Drainage piping serving fixtures which have flood level rims BP CE located below the elevation of the next upstream manhole cover of the public or private sewer serving such drainage piping shall be protected from backflow of sewage by installing an approved type backwater valve. Fixtures above such elevation shall not discharge through the backwater valve. Building Services 45-42. GP BP PS soils investigation prepared by a licensed Geotechnical Engineer is to be provided for the project. The report is to be provided at the time of building permit submittal along with the building plans for review by the Building Division. Recommendations contained in the report are to be incorporated into the project plans. Mitigation Measures 122 • • • r] • Conditions of Approval / Timing Responsibility Mitigation /Monitoring Measure Mitigation Monitoring Program PS: Planning Services BL Business BS: Building Services 9700 E/ Camino Real license GP: Grading PD: Fre Depend PD: Pdice Departrparnent Master Plan of Development Amendment Penin CE: City Engineer BP: Building WW: Wastewater CUP 2004-0137 - Hotel Pew CA Co Aftcnney FI: Final Inspection TO: Temporary Occupancy F0: Final Occupancy Mitigation Measure 1.c.1: The following landscape mitigations shall apply: BP BS, PS, CE 1.c.1 The project landscaping shall include street trees along the EI Camino Real and East Frontage Road frontage placed a minimum of 30 feet on center or at locations complimentary to the architectural design of the proposed buildings, subject to staff approval. ■ All proposed parking area trees shall be shade trees of 15 -gallon size and shall be double staked. Mitiqation Measure 1.c.2: The proposed buildings shall include the use of BP BS, PS, CE 1.c.2 paint and roof colors consistent with the architectural style as designed. The hotel building shall incorporate high quality brick veneer of a dark earth toned color as depicted on the attached elevation exhibit. The hotel building shall utilize darker earth toned accents and fagade colors, subject to staff approval. Awnings and/or similar accent features shall be included throughout the building fagade and along the lower floor level to enhance the architectural appearance of the building and mitigate the proposed additional height. Mitigation Measure 1.d.1: If exterior parking lot lighting is proposed, it shall BP BS, PS, CE 1.d.1 be designed to eliminate any off site glare. All exterior site lights shall utilize full cut-off, "hooded" lighting fixtures to prevent offsite light spillage and glare. Any luminaire pole height shall not exceed 14 -feet in height, limit intensity to 2.0 foot candles at ingress/egress, and otherwise 0.6 foot candle minimum to 1.0 maximum within the site. Fixtures shall be shield cut-off type and compatible with neighborhood setting, subject to staff approval. Mitigation Measure 3.b.1: BP, GP PS, CE 3.b.1 Naturally Occurring Asbestos (NOA) has been identified by the state Air Resources Board as a toxic air contaminant. Serpentine and ultramafic rocks are very common in the state and may contain naturally occurring asbestos. Under the State Air Resources Board Air Toxics Control Measure (ATCM) for Construction, Grading, Quarrying, and Surface Mining Operations, prior to any grading activities at the site, the project proponent shall ensure that a geologic evaluation is conducted to determine if naturally occurring asbestos is present within the area that will be disturbed. If naturally occurring asbestos is found at the site the applicant must comply with all requirements outlined in the Asbestos ATCM for Construction, Grading, Quarrying, and Surface Mining Operations. These requirements may include but are not limited to 1) an Asbestos Dust Mitigation Plan which must be approved by the District before construction begins, and 2) an Asbestos Health and Safety Program will also be required for some projects. Mitigation Measure 3.b.1: The project shall be conditioned to comply with all BP, GP BS, PS, CE 3.b.1 applicable District regulations pertaining to the control of fugitive dust (PM - 10) as contained in sections 6.3, 6.4 and 6.5 of the April 2003 Air Quality 123 Conditions of Approval / Mitigation Monitoring Program 9700 E/ Camino Real Master Plan of Development Amendment CUP 2004-0137 - Hotel Timing BL: Business License GP: Grading Pennit BP: Building Pern t FI: Final Inspection TO: Temporary Occupancy F0: Final Occupancy Responsibility /Monitoring PS: Planning Services BS: Buiding Services FD: File Departrrent PD: Police Depatnent CE: City Engineer WW: Wastewater CA, City AlItlyney Mitigation Measure Handbook. Secton 6.3: Construction Equipment • Maintain all construction equipment in proper tune according to manufacturer's specifications. ■ Fuel all off-road and portable diesel powered equipment, including but not limited to bulldozers, graders, cranes, loaders, scrapers, backhoes, generator sets, compressors, auxiliary power units, with ARB certified motor vehicle diesel fuel (Non -taxed version suitable for use off-road). ■ Maximize to the extent feasible, the use of diesel construction equipment meeting the ARB's 1996 or newer certification standard for off-road heavy-duty diesel engines. ■ Install diesel oxidation catalysts (DOC), catalyzed diesels particulate filters (CDPF) or other District approved emission reduction retrofit services (Required for projects grading more than 4.0 acres of continuously worked area). Section 6.4: Activity Management Techniques ■ Develop a comprehensive construction activity management plan designed to minimize the amount of large construction equipment operating during any given time period. • Schedule of construction truck trips during non -peak hours to reduce peak hour emissions. • Limit the length of the construction workday period, if necessary. • Phase construction activities, if appropriate. Section 6.5: Fugitive PM10 All of the following measures shall be included on grading, demolition and building plan notes: A. Reduce the amount of the disturbed area where possible. B. Use of water trucks or sprinkler systems in sufficient quantities to prevent airborne dust from leaving the site. Increased watering frequency would be required whenever wind speeds exceed 15 mph. Reclaimed (non -potable) water should be used whenever possible. C. All dirt stockpile areas should be sprayed daily as needed. D. Permanent dust control measures identified in the approved project re -vegetation and landscape plans should be implemented as soon as possible following completion of any soil disturbing activities. E. Exposed ground areas that are planned to be reworked at dates greater than one month after initial grading should be sown with a fast -germinating native grass seed and watered until vegetation is established. F. All disturbed soil areas not subject to re -vegetation should be stabilized using approved chemical soil binder, jute netting, or other methods approved in advance by the APCD. G. All roadways, driveways, sidewalks, etc, to be paved should be complete as soon as possible. In addition, building pads should be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil 124 • • • • • r� Conditions of Approval / Timing Responsibility Mitigation /Monitoring Measure Mitigation Monitoring Program PS: Planning Services BL: Business BS: Building Services 9700 El Camino Real License GP: Grading FD: Fire Depepavri PD: Police Departrnent Master Plan of Development Amendment Pemit CE C4 Engineer BP: Building ww: wastewater CUP 20040137 - Hotel PemA CA. City Ahyney FI: Final Inspection TO: Temporary Occupancy F0: Final Occupancy binders are used. H. Vehicle speed for all construction vehicles shall not exceed 15 mph on any unpaved surface at the construction site. A{1 trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials are to be covered or should maintain at least two feet of freeboard (minimum vertical distance between top of load and top of trailer) in accordance with CVC Section 23114. J. Install wheel washers where vehicles enter and exit unpaved roads onto streets, or wash off trucks and equipment leaving the site. K. Sweep streets at the end of each day if visible soil material is carried onto adjacent paved roads. Water sweepers with reclaimed water should be used where feasible. The contractor or builder shall designate a person or persons to monitor the dust control program and to order increased watering, as necessary, to prevent transport of dust off site. The name and telephone number of such persons shall be provided to the APCD prior to land use clearance for map recordation and land use clearance for finish grading of any structure. Mitigation 3.b.2: The applicant shall contact the APCD for any permits BP APCD 3.b.2 necessary related to developmental burning of vegetative material and/or construction permit re uirements. Mitigation Measure 4.e.1: Grading and excavation and grading work shall BP PS 4.0 be consistent with the City of Atascadero Tree Ordinance. Special precautions when working around native trees include: 1. All existing trees outside of the limits of work shall remain. 2. Earthwork shall not exceed the limits of the project area. 3. Low branches in danger of being torn from trees shall be pruned prior to any heavy equipment work being done. 4. Vehicles and stockpiled material shall be stored outside the dripline of all trees. 5. All trees within the area of work shall be fenced for protection with 4 -foot chain link, snow or safety fencing placed per the approved tree protection plan. Tree protection fencing shall be in place prior to any site excavation or grading. Fencing shall remain in place until completion of all construction activities. 6. Any roots that are encountered during excavation shall be clean cut by hand and sealed with an approved tree seal. Mitigation Measure 4.e.2: The developer shall contract with a certified BP PS 4.e.2 arborist during all phases of project implementation. The certified arborists shall be responsible for monitoring the project during all phases of construction through project completion, as follows: (a) A written agreement between the arborist and the developer outlining a arborist monitoring schedule for each construction phase through final inspection shall be submitted to and approved by planning staff prior to the issuance of building/grading permits. b Arborist shall schedule a re -construction meeting with engineering 125 Conditions of Approval / Timing Responsibility Mitigation Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure PS: Planning Services BL Business BS: Building Services 9700 E/ Camino Real txerre FD: Fire Department Master Plan of Development Amendment GP: Grading Penrd PD: Police Department CE: City Engineer CUP 2004-0137 - Hotel PPrBuilding �a y FI: Final Inspeclion TO: Temporary Occupancy F0: Final dun Y /planning staff, grading equipment operators, project superintendent to review the project conditions and requirements prior to any grubbing or earth work for any portion of the project site. All tree protection fencing and trunk protection shall be installed for inspection during the meeting. Tree protection fencing shall be installed at the line of encroachment into the tree's root zone area. (c) As specified by the arborist report and City staff: ■ Prune all trees in active development areas to be saved for structural strength and crown cleaning by a licensed and certified arborist. ■ Remove all debris and spoils from the lot cleaning and tree pruning. ■ In locations where paving is to occur within the tree canopy, grub only and do not grade or compact. Install porous pavers over a three-inch bed of % inch granite covered with one -inch pea gravel for screeding. If curbs are required, use pegged curbs to secure the porous pavers. Pegged curbs are reinforced six to eight curbs poured at grade with a one -foot by one -foot pothole every four to six linear feet. • All trenching or grading within the protected root zone area, outside of the tree protection fence shall require hand trenching or preserve and protect roots that are larger than 2 inches in diameter. ■ No grading or trenching is allowed within the fenced protected area. ■ Any roots that are 4 inches in diameter or larger are not to be cut until inspected and approved by the on-site arborist. (d) Upon project completion and prior to final occupancy a final status report shall be prepared by the project arborist certifying that the tree protection plan was implemented, the trees designated for protection were protected during construction, and the construction -related tree protection measures are no longer required for tree protection. Mitigation Measure 4.e.3: All tree removals shall be mitigated in accordance GP, BP PS 4.e.3 with the Atascadero native Tree Ordinance. Mitigation Measure 6.b.1: The grading permit application plans shall include GP PS, BS, CE 6.b.1 erosion control measures to prevent soil, dirt, and debris from entering the storm drain system during and after construction. A separate plan shall be submitted for this purpose and shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer at the time of Building Permit application. Mitigation Measure 6.c.1: A soils report shall be required to be submitted BP, GP PS, BS, CE 6.c.1 with a future building permit by the building department. 126 is • • • r� Conditions of Approval / Timing Responsibility Mitigation /Monitoring Measure Mitigation Monitoring Program PS: Planning Seuices BL: Business BS: Building Ser&m 9700 E/ Camino Rea/ Incense Grading ading FD: Fire D Depaient PD: Police Depatrnent Master Plan of Development Amendment Pe,nit CE: City Engineer BP: Building M Wastewater CUP 2004-0137 - Hotel Paint ca City Abmey FI: Final Inspection T0: Temporary 0mWavy FO: Final Occupancy Mitigation Measure 8.e.f.1: The developer is responsible for ensuring that GP PS, BS, CE 8.e.f.1 all contractors are aware of all storm water quality measures and that such mea^oras are implemented. Failure to comply with the approved :.ar,;:.t-uction Best Management Practices will result in the issuance of correction notices, citations, or stop orders. Mitigation Measure 11.d.1: All construction activities shall comply with the BP, GP PS, BS, CE 11.d.1 City of Atascadero Noise Ordinance for hours of operation. Mitigation Measure 15.a.b.1: Required fair share contributions to the Santa BP, GP PS, CE 15.a.b.1 Rosa / 101 interchange improvements (signal and associated improvements) for the hotel portion of the proposed project shall be as follows: a. E. Front Street/ NB 101 On -Ramp Intersection: 17.5% b. W. Front Street / SB 101 On -Ramp Intersection: 9.7% Fees due shall be required prior to, or currently with, issuance of building permits for the proposed hotel development. Impacts from the proposed office complex are anticipated in the General Plan and no additional fair share payments will be required for the addition of medical office uses. The fairshare contribution would be based on a maximum of $600,000 or the engineers estimate at the time of the payment of the fee which ever is lower. If the fairshare fee is paid and no reimbursement plan is filed by the W Front Street project (required to construct the signals) within two years of the date of payment of the fairshare fee the fees paid by the applicant would be returned to the applicant and the mitigation measure would be removed from the requirements for this project Mitigation Measure 15.d.1: Improvements to East Front shall include the BP, GP PS, CE 15.d.1 following: 1. The applicant shall use a Caltrans standard Slurry Seal on East Front. 2. A City standard 423 driveway approach shall be used with a maximum width of 36'. 3. Painted median tapers that conform to the Caltrans Highway Design Manual, Section 400 design standards shall be installed. Deviations to the Caltrans standard shall be justified by the applicant and approved by the City Public Works Director. The southern median taper shall be located so that the taper starts near the southern property line. This will provide a longer left turn center lane for vehicles heading south on East Front Street. 4. All painted medians shall be marked with Caltrans standard thermal paint and appropriately colored. 5. A guardrail shall be installed in front of the power pole on East Front. 127 Conditions of Approval / Timing Responsibility Mitigation Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure PS: Planning Services BL: Business BS: Building Services 9700 El Camino Rea/ License FD: Fire Deparbnent Master Plan of Development Amendment GP: Grading Peart PD: Police Depatrnent CE: CityEngirreer CUP 2004-0137 - Hotel BP: Building Pernet WW: wastewater CA CityAbmey FI: Final Inspection T0: Temporary Occupancy F0: Final Occupancy Mitigation Measure 15.f.1: The maximum use intensities shall be as follows: BP, GP PS, CE 1511 1. 11,000 sf office 2. 1,400 sf retail/restaurant 3. 3,400 sf medical offices 4. 80 -room hotel Any increases in parking demand or turn -over rates will require additional Parking analysis. If any additional impacts occur, subsequent environmental documentation will be required. Mitigation Measure 151.2: Shared parking shall be required throughout the BP, GP PS, CE 1512 site. No reserved parking shall be permitted. 128 • • • • • • EXHIBIT B: Master Plan of Development/Site Plan v "' re•�:8 4 a d i 6 �•c T- jk Ip a P� gg 9e,€ ■ aoa , - a 9 • 1'11 ag�`' d� y �. l__' R r. ■ a (! � p5 �a�9 FF ■ ._ _�J �l..il k ■ .�.><.� fid. �--_ ■ �JI9� q ■ i r 1f __________________..r�-ice 1 d ■ ,I ■ �e �T I Cf ��� ■ , y ■ �i ��9t�'I 8 1 ■ oor j ■ 3E ■ r i R Previously approved section — no changes exceptthose specifically noted in resolution conditions d n N I ' � qqq t �1 c g� 'y £ C ! S[ ¢ COMPOSITE UTI U PLAN ERIC J. GOBLER CERENGINEERING 4% •� � 1 - ATASCAOERO HOTEL PROJfC1 amnio n� Lar s. nock 11:'+' PFx �056-OBI-W1 8110 ATASCAOERO AVE TASCADERO,'CA. 91422 r.w -� m1 ".-vu uaa i.ml 9700 EL CAYINO REAL, ITA"'," O C/TY Or ATASCAOERD f� w IrsIN. 129 I • r� • EXHIBIT D: Landscape Plan .I i i y r� '►°i°s°i�{+�Q�lr�"ti :::' "��iXyf`s�� E101Ra'0 �p 5ti COY m�1177d1 burp; gc tall wee°A 4 %�®i� •®e° t 7 .. beef •OAAAeb�y _ �f b ♦ a eeeee, � ail a �ryj ql _ Oil, 3S3�n F75L�, aI a , .a i ♦e ♦Ao ''s'� rryYyy{t���', fe♦♦ee� �"" �^ ee0 ♦♦ 'r'L eM4 em r )il'L�^ mee o♦ �. e s ♦ e 9 ° � .> ,� 131 EXHIBIT E: Color and Materials Board F.wj , .-- �V—.— F,�F— color selecti ,,. ons 132 • r� • • • • EXHIBIT F: Grading and Drainage Plan n I L f j tIl GRADING AND DRA NGE PUN �~ GFRI ENGI OLERG ERIC J. OOBLER. 's G �p h}�y, II4 .- I TA�`-mak v� ✓� L N� NF t ATASGOCRO HOTEL PROJECT .. i MMMMIe'KL'Nh1i CM�e! -0.1k AI 9�0p .ITY p1 O ATAiCAO[NO AVE A/ASCAOEWO, W.. 9DA22 O10 TAS. E-AOCM CTTY OF ATASCADERO ��r •..•.w xr. Y I A.4w�_y 1p� a --�-- 133 134 EXHIBIT G: Hotel Site Sections • • • �ryry .I+ ON30YJSYlY !O[/,7a:zrro96��anvoaaa 83'IBOfl f 0183 19.3f08dVION OL3079SY1Y SN011035-X 3115 aaa: 11:1�1:1�, Cz �f a et""�@t�dkg "Pill m 9 "o D 6 d L fi O� Y C�5 �k 8 i f W: I I L..NT_ ... I z � l ' 1 ' -- I • • • f .I+ ON30YJSYlY !O[/,7a:zrro96��anvoaaa 83'IBOfl f 0183 19.3f08dVION OL3079SY1Y SN011035-X 3115 • • • .I+ aaa: 11:1�1:1�, • • • • ATTACHMENT 5: Draft Ordinance A - Zone Text Amendment DRAFT ORDINANCE A ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ATASCADERO MUNICIPAL CODE BY APPROVING ZONE CHANGE 7,006-0130 TO ESTABLISH "HEALTH CARE SERVICES" AS A CONDITIONAL USE IN THE COMMERCIAL TOURIST (CT) ZONE (Jacobson) The City Council hereby finds and declares as follows: WHEREAS, an application has been received from Ted Jacobson (8055 Cristobal Avenue, Atascadero, CA 93422) Applicant and Property Owner to consider Zone Text Amendment to add "health care services" as a conditional use within the Commercial Tourist (CT) zone; and, Ig WHEREAS, the City of Atascadero's 2025 General Plan incorporated a series of Smart Growth goals that include efficient use and reuse of existing lands and for more compact, pedestrian scaled development through intensification of commercially designated land uses; and, WHEREAS, the General Plan contains Policies and Programs to provide a sound economic base to sustain the City's unique character by establishing a range of employment and business opportunities and generate sufficient revenue to support adequate levels of public services, and environment, social and educational quality and to retain and expand existing businesses and attract new businesses to improve the availability of goods and services; and, WHEREAS, the General Plan contains Policies and Programs to provide public and Planning Commission review of uses which may have potential impacts to surrounding uses and neighborhoods; and, WHEREAS, an Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration 2007-0002 were prepared for the project and made available for public review in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to enact this amendment to the Zoning Code Text to protect the health, safety, and welfare of its citizens by applying orderly development and expanding housing opportunities within the City; and, 135 WHEREAS, the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and public notice of environmental documents, as set forth in the State and local guidelines for implementation of the • California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) have been adhered to; and, WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed Public Hearing upon the subject Zone Text Change application was held by the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero at which hearing evidence, oral and documentary, was admitted on behalf of said zoning text amendments; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, at a Public Hearing held on April 3, 2007 studied and considered Zone Change 2006-0130, after first studying and considering the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project, and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Atascadero, at a duly noticed Public Hearing held on May 8, 2007, studied and considered Zone Change 2006-0130, after first studying and considering the Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project; and, NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Findings for Approval of a Zone Text Change. The City Council finds as follows: 1. The zone change is consistent with General Plan policies and all other applicable ordinances and policies of the City. 0 2. Amendment of the zoning ordinance will provide for the orderly and efficient use of lands where such development standards are applicable. 3. The zone change will not, in itself, result in significant environmental impacts. SECTION 2. Approval. The City Council of the City of Atascadero, in a regular session assembled on May 8, 2007 resolved to introduce for first reading by title only, an ordinance that would amend the City Zoning code text with the following: 9-3.243 Conditional uses. The following uses may be allowed in the Commercial Tourist Zone. The establishment of conditional uses shall be as provided by Section 9-2.109: (a) Amusement services; (b) Auto, mobilehome and vehicle dealers and supplies (see Section 9-6.163); (c) Bar/tavern; (d) Eating and drinking places with drive-through facilities; (e) Health Care Services; (ef) Sales lots (see Section 9-6.139); (fg) Caretaker's residence (see Section 9-6.104); (,h) Pipelines. Is 136 •SECTION 3. A summary of this ordinance, approved by the City Attorney, together with the ayes and noes, shall be published twice: at least five days prior to its final passage in the Atascadero News, a newspaper published and circulated in the City of Atascadero, and; before the expiration of fifteen (15) days after its final passage in the Atascadero News, a newspaper published and circulated in the City of Atascadero. A copy of the full text of this ordinance shall be on file in the City Clerk's office on and after the date following introduction and passage and shall be available to any interested member of the public. INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council held on , and PASSED and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Atascadero, State of California, on by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: • ATTEST: r� CITY OF ATASCADERO Marcia McClure Torgerson, C.M.C., City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Patrick L. Enright, City Attorney Dr. George Luna, Mayor 137 ATTACHMENT 6: Draft Resolution C - Health Care Services DRAFT RESOLUTION C . RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2004-0137 AMENDMENT TO APPROVE 3,400 SQUARE -FEET OF HEALTH CARE SERVICE USE LOCATED AT APN 056-081-032 (9700 El Camino Real — Jacobson) WHEREAS, an application has been received from Ted Jacobson (8055 Cristobal Avenue, Atascadero, Ca 93422) Applicant and Property Owner to consider an amendment to Conditional Use Permit 2004-0137 to establish health care services within the office portion of the development; and, WHEREAS, the site's current General Plan Designation is General Commercial (GC); and, • WHEREAS, the site's current zoning is Commercial Tourist (CT); and, G WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended that "health care services" be added as a conditional use within the Commercial Tourist (CT) zone; and, WHEREAS, an Initial Study and Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration 2007-0002 were prepared for the project and made available for public review in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and, WHEREAS, the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and public notice of environmental documents, as set forth in the State and local guidelines for implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) have been adhered to; and, WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed Public Hearing upon the subject Conditional Use Permit Amendment application was held by the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero at which hearing evidence, oral and documentary, was admitted on behalf of said Master Plan of Development; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, at a duly noticed Public Hearing held on April 3, 2007, studied and considered the Conditional Use Permit 2004- 0137 Amendment, after first studying and considering the Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project, and, 138 • WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Atascadero, at a duly noticed Public Hearing •held on May 8, 2007, studied and considered Conditional Use Permit 2004-0137 Amendment, after first studying and considering the Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project, and, NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Atascadero takes the following actions: SECTION 1. Findinus for approval of Conditional Use Permit Amendment. The City Council finds as follows: The proposed project or use is consistent with the General Plan and the City's Appearance Review Manual; and, 2. The proposed project or use satisfies all applicable provisions of the Title (Zoning Ordinance); and, 3. The establishment, and subsequent operation or conduct of the use will not, because of the circumstances and conditions applied in the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of the general public or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the use, or be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity of the use; and, 4. That the proposed project or use will not be inconsistent with the character or the immediate neighborhood or contrary to its orderly development; and, 5. That the proposed use or project will not generate a volume of traffic beyond the safe capacity of all roads providing access to the project, either existing or to be improved in conjunction with the project, or beyond the normal traffic volume of the surrounding neighborhood that would result from full development in accordance with the Land Use Element. SECTION 2. FindinLs for shared on-site and peak -hour parking reduction. The City Counicl finds as follows: The characteristics of a use or its immediate vicinity do not necessitate the number of parking spaces, type of design, or improvements required by this title and that reduced parking will be adequate to accommodate on the site all parking needs generated by the use. SECTION 3. Approval. The City Council of the City of Atascadero, in a regular session assembled on May 8, 2007, resolved to approve Conditional Use Permit 2004-0137 Amendment subject to the following: EXHIBIT A: Conditions of Approval EXHIBIT B: Site Plan • 139 On motion by Council Member and seconded by Council Member the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following • roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ADOPTED: CITY OF ATASCADERO ATTEST: Marcia McClure Torgerson, C.M.C., City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Patrick L. Enright, City Attorney 140 Dr. George Luna, Mayor • • • • • EXHIBIT A: Conditions of Approval / Mitigation Monitoring Program Master Plan of Development Amendment (CUP 2004-0137) - Health Care Services Conditions of Approval C / Timing Responsibility /Monitoring Mitigation Measure Mitigation Monitoring Program PS: Planning Services 9El Camino Real BL: Business Licene sepatri GP: G700 rading BS: Building Services FD: Fire Dep PD: Police Departirient Master Plan of Development Amendment Pennit BP: Building CE: City Engineer WW: Wastewater CUP 2004-0137 — Establishment of Health Care Services Pemit Ca Cdrnttorm FI: Final Inspection TO:Tenporary Occupancy F0: Final occuparq Planning Services 1. This conditional use permit shall be for 3,400 square -feet of health care Ongoing PS services medical offices located within the office portion of the development located at 9700 EI Camino Real as shown on Exhibit B.. 2. The approval of this use permit shall become final and effective for the BP PS purposes of issuing building permits thirty (30) days following the second reading of ZCH application 2006-0130. 3. The Community Development Department shall have the authority to BP PS, BS, FD approve improvements associated with the building code requirements for covered drop-off areas and any other exterior ,modifications related to the permitting of medial facilities subject to the following: • All improvements to the exterior of the building shall be architecturally compatible with the building architecture. • Any required covered canopy structure will be constructed of architectural columns and shall include a tiled roof consistent with the approved architecture. • Parking shall not be reduced to accommodate any required site improvements. • Driveway widths shall not be decreased and all improvements shall be reviewed by the City of Atascadero Fire Department. 4. Approval of this Conditional Use Permit shall be valid for twelve (12) BPI PS months after its effective date. At the end of the period, the approval Ongoing shall expire and become null and void unless the project has received a building permit for all necessary Tenant Improvements and/or a business license for a medical use. 5. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Ongoing Atascadero or its agents, officers, and employees against any claim or action brought to challenge an approval by the city, or any of its entities, concerning the subdivision. Mitigation Measures 141 Conditions of Approval / Timing Responsibility Mitigation Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure PS: Planning Services BL: Businew BS: Building Services 9700 E/ Camino Rea/ Incense GP: Grading FD: Fire Depep rtm PD: Poke Department Master Plan of Development Amendment Permit CECity Engineer CUP 2004-0137 — Establishment of Health Care Services BP: Budding Permit WW: Mom" CkCity Mornay FI: Final Inspection TO: Temporary Occupancy F0: Final Occupancy Mitigation Measure 1.c.1: The following landscape mitigations shall apply: BP BS, PS, CE 1.c.1 v The project landscaping shall include street trees along the EI Camino Real and East Frontage Road frontage placed a minimum of 30 feet on center or at locations complimentary to the architectural design of the proposed buildings, subject to staff approval. ■ All proposed parking area trees shall be shade trees of 15-gallon size and shall be double staked. Mitigation Measure 1.c.2: The proposed buildings shall include the use of paint BP BS, PS, CE 1.c.2 and roof colors consistent with the architectural style as designed. The hotel building shall incorporate high quality brick veneer of a dark earth toned color as depicted on the attached elevation exhibit. The hotel building shall utilize darker earth toned accents and facade colors, subject to staff approval. Awnings and/or similar accent features shall be included throughout the building fagade and along the lower floor level to enhance the architectural appearance of the building and mitigate the proposed additional height. Mitigation Measure 1.d.1: If exterior parking lot lighting is proposed, it shall be BP BS, PS, CE 1.d.1 designed to eliminate any off site glare. All exterior site lights shall utilize full cut-off, "hooded" lighting fixtures to prevent offsite light spillage and glare. Any luminaire pole height shall not exceed 14-feet in height, limit intensity to 2.0 foot candles at ingress/egress, and otherwise 0.6 foot candle minimum to 1.0 maximum within the site. Fixtures shall be shield cut-off type and compatible with neighborhood setting, subject to staff approval. Mitiqation Measure 3.b.1: BP, GP PS, CE 3.b.1 Naturally Occurring Asbestos (NOA) has been identified by the state Air Resources Board as a toxic air contaminant. Serpentine and ultramafic rocks are very common in the state and may contain naturally occurring asbestos. Under the State Air Resources Board Air Toxics Control Measure (ATCM) for Construction, Grading, Quarrying, and Surface Mining Operations, prior to any grading activities at the site, the project proponent shall ensure that a geologic evaluation is conducted to determine if naturally occurring asbestos is present within the area that will be disturbed. If naturally occurring asbestos is found at the site the applicant must comply with all requirements outlined in the Asbestos ATCM for Construction, Grading, Quarrying, and Surface Mining Operations. These requirements may include but are not limited to 1) an Asbestos Dust Mitigation Plan which must be approved by the District before construction begins, and 2) an Asbestos Health and Safety Program will also be required for some projects. Mitigation Measure 3.b.1: The project shall be conditioned to comply with all BP, GP BS, PS, CE 3.b.1 applicable District regulations pertaining to the control of fugitive dust (PM-10) as contained in sections 6.3, 6.4 and 6.5 of the April 2003 Air Quality Handbook. 142 • • • • • Conditions of Approval / Mitigation Monitoring Program 9700 E/ Camino Rea/ Master Plan of Development Amendment CUP 2004-0137 — Establishment of Health Care Services Timing BL Business License GP: Grading Perrin BP: Building Pemdt FI: Final InGspeclion TO: Temporary Occupancy F0: Final Occupancy Responsibility /Monitoring PS: Planning Services BS: Building Services FD: Re Deparbnend PD: Police Depa4nent CE: Gly Enoneer WW: WastevraW CACilynffomey Mitigation Measure Section 6.3: Construction Equipment ■ Maintain all construction equipment in proper tune according to manufacturer's specifications. °,ae: all off-road and portable diesel powered equipment, including but not limited to bulldozers, graders, cranes, loaders, scrapers, backhoes, generator sets, compressors, auxiliary power units, with ARB certified motor vehicle diesel fuel (Non -taxed version suitable for use off-road). • Maximize to the extent feasible, the use of diesel construction equipment meeting the ARB's 1996 or newer certification standard for off-road heavy- duty diesel engines. ■ Install diesel oxidation catalysts (DOC), catalyzed diesels particulate filters (CDPF) or other District approved emission reduction retrofit services (Required for projects grading more than 4.0 acres of continuously worked area). Section 6.4: Activity Management Techniques • Develop a comprehensive construction activity management plan designed to minimize the amount of large construction equipment operating during any given time period. ■ Schedule of construction truck trips during non -peak hours to reduce peak hour emissions. ■ Limit the length of the construction workday period, if necessary. • Phase construction activities, if appropriate. Section 6.5: Fugitive PM10 All of the following measures shall be included on grading, demolition and building plan notes: L. Reduce the amount of the disturbed area where possible. M. Use of water trucks or sprinkler systems in sufficient quantities to prevent airborne dust from leaving the site. Increased watering frequency would be required whenever wind speeds exceed 15 mph. Reclaimed (non -potable) water should be used whenever possible. N. All dirt stockpile areas should be sprayed daily as needed. O. Permanent dust control measures identified in the approved project re - vegetation and landscape plans should be implemented as soon as possible following completion of any soil disturbing activities. P. Exposed ground areas that are planned to be reworked at dates greater than one month after initial .grading should be sown with a fast - germinating native grass seed and watered until vegetation is established. Q. All disturbed soil areas not subject to re -vegetation should be stabilized using approved chemical soil binder, jute netting, or other methods approved in advance by the APCD. R. All roadways, driveways, sidewalks, etc, to be paved should be complete as soon as possible. In addition, building pads should be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used. S. Vehicle speed for all construction vehicles shall not exceed 15 mph on any unpaved surface at the construction site. 143 Conditions of Approval / Timing Responsibility Mitigation Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure PS: Planning Services BL: Business BS: Building Services 9700 E/ Camino Real License FD: Fre Depatrnent Master Plan of Development Amendment GP: Grading Permit PD: Police Departnent CE: City Engineer CUP 2004-0137 - Establishment of Health Care Services BP: Building Penin WW: Wasleural r CA: cnyamn,ey FI: Final Inspection T0: Temporary occupancy F0: Final Occupancy T. All trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials are to be covered or should maintain at least two feet of freeboard (minimum vertical distance between top of load and top of trailer) in accordance with CVC Section 23114. U. Install wheel washers where vehicles enter and exit unpaved roads onto streets, or wash off trucks and equipment leaving the site. V. Sweep streets at the end of each day if visible soil material is carried onto adjacent paved roads. Water sweepers with reclaimed water should be used where feasible. The contractor or builder shall designate a person or persons to monitor the dust control program and to order increased watering, as necessary, to prevent transport of dust off site. The name and telephone number of such persons shall be provided to the APCD prior to land use clearance for map recordation and land use clearance for finish grading of any structure. Mitigation 3.b.2: The applicant shall contact the APCD for any permits BP APCD 3.b.2 necessary related to developmental burning of vegetative material and/or construction permit requirements. Mitigation Measure 4.e.1: Grading and excavation and grading work shall be BP PS 4.e.1 consistent with the City of Atascadero Tree Ordinance. Special precautions when working around native trees include: 7. All existing trees outside of the limits of work shall remain. 8. Earthwork shall not exceed the limits of the project area. 9. Low branches in danger of being torn from trees shall be pruned prior to any heavy equipment work being done. 10. Vehicles and stockpiled material shall be stored outside the dripline of all trees. 11. All trees within the area of work shall be fenced for protection with 4 - foot chain link, snow or safety fencing placed per the approved tree protection plan. Tree protection fencing shall be in place prior to any site excavation or grading. Fencing shall remain in place until completion of all construction activities. 12. Any roots that are encountered during excavation shall be clean cut by hand and sealed with an approved tree seal. Mitigation Measure 4.e.2: The developer shall contract with a certified arborist BP PS 4.e.2 during all phases of project implementation. The certified arborists shall be responsible for monitoring the project during all phases of construction through project completion, as follows: (a) A written agreement between the arborist and the developer outlining a arborist monitoring schedule for each construction phase through final inspection shall be submitted to and approved by planning staff prior to the issuance of building/grading permits. (b) Arborist shall schedule a pre -construction meeting with engineering /planning staff, grading equipment operators, project superintendent to review the project conditions and requirements prior to any grubbingor 144 • • • • • Conditions of Approval ! Timing Responsibility Mitigation /Monitoring Measure Mitigation Monitoring Program PS: Planning Services Bl: Business BS: Building Services 9700 El Camino Rea/ ISP: Grce. GP: Grading FD: Fire Depeparrit PD: Price Depabnent Master Plan of Development Amendment Pennit CE: Co Engineer CUP 2004-0137 — Establishment of Health Care Services BP: Building Permit WW: Wastewater CA: City Aturney Fl: Final Inspection TO: Ter porary Occupancy F0: Final Occupancy earth work for any portion of the project site. All tree protection fencing and trunk protection shall be installed for inspection during the meeting. Tree rrotection fencing shall be installed at the line of encroachment into the s ez s root zone area. (c) As specified by the arborist report and City staff: ■ Prune all trees in active development areas to be saved for structural strength and crown cleaning by a licensed and certified arborist. ■ Remove all debris and spoils from the lot cleaning and tree pruning. ■ In locations where paving is to occur within the tree canopy, grub only and do not grade or compact. Install porous pavers over a three-inch bed of % inch granite covered with one -inch pea gravel for screeding. If curbs are required, use pegged curbs to secure the porous pavers. Pegged curbs are reinforced six to eight curbs poured at grade with a one -foot by one -foot pothole every four to six linear feet. • All trenching or grading within the protected root zone area, outside of the tree protection fence shall require hand trenching or preserve and protect roots that are larger than 2 inches in diameter. • No grading or trenching is allowed within the fenced protected area. • Any roots that are 4 inches in diameter or larger are not to be cut until inspected and approved by the on-site arborist. (d) Upon project completion and prior to final occupancy a final status report shall be prepared by the project arborist certifying that the tree protection plan was implemented, the trees designated for protection were protected during construction, and the construction -related tree protection measures are no longer required for tree protection. Mitigation Measure 4.e.3: All tree removals shall be mitigated in accordance GP, BP PS 4.e.3 with the Atascadero native Tree Ordinance. Mitigation Measure 6.b.1: The grading permit application plans shall include GP PS, BS, CE 6.b.1 erosion control measures to prevent soil, dirt, and debris from entering the storm drain system during and after construction. A separate plan shall be submitted for this purpose and shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer at the time of Building Permit application. _P Mitigation Measure 6.c.1: A soils report shall be required to be submitted with a BP, GP S-, B—SC E 6.C.1 future building permit by the building department. Mitigation Measure 8.e.f.1: The developer is responsible for ensuring that all GP PS, BS, CE 8.0.1 contractors are aware of all storm water quality measures and that such measures are implemented. Failure to comply with the approved construction Best Management Practices will result in the issuance of correction notices, citations, or stop orders. Mitigation Measure 11.d.1: All construction activities shall comply with the City BP, GP PS, BS, CE 11.d.1 of Atascadero Noise Ordinance for hours of operation. 145 Conditions of Approval / Timing Responsibility Mitigation Mitigation Monitoring Program Nonitoring Measure PS: Planning Savioes BL: Business BS: Building Services 9700 E/ Camino Rea/ License FD: Fie Depaitnant Master Plan of Development Amendment GP: Grading Perm PD: Plaice Depa lmnt CE: CityEnWw CUP 20040137 — Establishment of Health Care Services BP: Building Pearn WW: Wastewater CA, City Aftxney FI: Final Inspwbon T0: Temporary Occupary F0: Final Occupancy Mitigation Measure 15.a.b.1: Required fair share contributions to the Santa BP, GP PS, CE 15.a.b.1 Rosa / 101 interchange improvements (signal and associated improvements) for the hotel portion of the proposed project shall be as follows: a. E. Front Street / NB 101 On -Ramp Intersection: 17.5% b. W. Front Street/ SB 101 On -Ramp Intersection: 9.7% Fees due shall be required prior to, or currently with, issuance of building permits for the proposed hotel development. Impacts from the proposed office complex are anticipated in the General Plan and no additional fair share payments will be required for the addition of medical office uses. Mitigation Measure 15.d.1: Improvements to East Front shall include the BP, GP PS, CE 15.4.1 following: 6. The applicant shall use a Caltrans standard Slurry Seal on East Front. 7. A City standard 423 driveway approach shall be used with a maximum width of 36'. 8. Painted median tapers that conform to the Caltrans Highway Design Manual, Section 400 design standards shall be installed. Deviations to the Caltrans standard shall be justified by the applicant and approved by the City Public Works Director. The southern median taper shall be located so that the taper starts near the southern property line. This will provide a longer left turn center lane for vehicles heading south on East Front Street. 9. All painted medians shall be marked with Caltrans standard thermal paint and appropriately colored. 10. A guardrail shall be installed in front of the power pole on East Front. Mitigation Measure 15.f.1: The maximum use intensities shall be as follows: BP, GP PS, CE 1511 5. 11,000 sf office 6. 1,400 sf retail/restaurant 7. 3,400 sf medical offices 8. 80 -room hotel Any increases in parking demand or turn -over rates will require additional Parking analysis. If any additional impacts occur, subsequent environmental documentation will be required. Mitigation Measure 15.f.2: Shared parking shall be required throughout the site. BP, GP PS, CE 15.f.2 No reserved parking shall be permitted. 146 • • U • • EXHIBIT B: Site Plan 147 0 • :7