HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 03/13/1990 LEE DAYKA
CITY CLERK
A G E N D A
ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
ATASCADERO ADMINISTRATION BUILDING
6500 PALMA
FOURTH FLOOR, ROTUNDA ROOM
MARCH 13, 1990
7:00 P.M.
This agenda is prepared and posted pursuant to ;the require-
ments of Government Code Section 54954 .2 . By listing a topic on
this agenda, the City Council has expressed its intent to discuss
and act on each item In addition to any action identified in
the brief general description of each item, the action that may
be taken shall include: A referral to staff with specific re-
quests for information continuance; specific direction to staff
concerning the policy or mission of the item; discontinuance of
consideration; authorization to enter into negotiations and exe-
cute agreements pertaining to the item; adoption or approval;
and, disapproval
Copies of the staff reports or other documentation relating
to each item of business referred to on the agenda are on file in
the office of the City Clerk, available for public inspection
during City Hall business hours. The City Clerk will answer any
questions regarding the agenda.
RULES OF PUBLIC PARTICIPATION;
* Members of the audience may speak on any item on the agenda.
A person may speak for five (5) minutes:
No one may speak for a second time until everyone wishing to
speak has had an opportunity to do so
Noone may speak more than twice on any item.
Council Members may question any speaker; the speaker may
respond but, after the allotted time has expired, may, not
initiate further discussion.
* The floor will then be closed to public participation and
open for Council discussion.
Call to Order
Pledge of Allegiance
Roll Call
City Council Comment:
Proclamations (3) :
• "Tri-Counties Small Business Opportunities Day", March
7, 1990
• "Camp Fire Birthday Week") March 12-18, 1990
COMMUNITY FORUM:
The City Council values and encouragesexchange of ideas and
comments from you, the citizen. The Community Forum period is
provided to receive comments from the public on matters other
than scheduled agenda items . To increase the effectiveness of
Community Forum, the following rules will be enforced:
A maximum of 30 minutes will be allowed for Community Forum,
unless Council authorizes an extension.
All remarks shall be addressed to Council, as a whole, and
not to any individual member thereof .
* No person shall be permitted to make slanderous, profane or
personal remarks against any Council Member, commissions &
staff.
A. CONSENT CALENDAR:
All matters listed under Item A, Consent Calendar, are considered
to be routine, and wil be enacted by one motion in the form
listed below. There will be no separate discussion on these
items . A member of the Council or public may, by request, have
any item removed from the Consent Calendar, which shall then be
reviewed and acted upon separately after the adoption of the con-
sent Calendar. Where ordinance adoption' is' involved, action by
Council on the Consent Calendar will presuppose waiving of the
reading in full of the ordinance in question
1. FEBRUARY 27, 1990 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
2. TENTATIVE• PARCEL MAP 25-89 Proposed subdivision of one
6 .7 acre parcel into four lots of 2 . 17, ' 1 .60, 1 .67 and 1 . 25
acres. The proposal also includes the creation of 81 com-
mercial condominium units at 5804 Capistrano Avenue (Hotel
Park) (Lewis, et-al/North Coast Engineering)
3. RESOLUTION NO. 24-90 REQUEST TO ADD MICHAEL FORISTER AND
STEVEN G. ALVAREZ TO THE LIST OF CITY-APPROVED CERTIFIED
ARBORISTS '
4. TECHNICAL ADJUSTMENTS TO SALARY & POSITION RESOLUTIONS WHICH
WERE ADOPTED 2/27/90:
A. RESOLUTION NO. 28-90 AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 13-90,
ESTABLISHING SALARIES FOR CITY EMPLOYEES
2
B. RESOLUTION NO. 29-90 - AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 14-90,
ESTABLISHING PERMANENT AUTHORIZED POSITIONS IN THE CITY
OF ATASCADERO
5. AWARD OF BID #90-1 FOR SEWER JET TRUCE
6 . AWARD OF BSD #89-9 'FOR< DIAL-A-RIDE BUSES
7. AUTHORIZE PURCHASE OF NEW FURNITURE FOR POLICE FACILITY
8. RESOLUTION NO. 30-90 PROCLAIMING MARCH 23-31, 1990 AS
"CENSUS WEEK
C. REGULAR BUSINESS
1. DISCUSSION RE SKATEBOARD SURVEY AND POSSIBLE ORDINANCE DIR-
ECTION
2. RESOLUTION NO. 25--90 RE-APPOINTING THREE MEMBERS TO THE
BUILDING &' CONSTRUCTION BOARD OF APPEALS
3. CREATION OF A CREEKWAY PLANNING & MAPPING COMMITTEE
4 . CREATION OF A` RISK REVIEW COMMITTEE'
5. SET STUDY SESSION DATE FOR FISCAL PLANNING MODEL RFP'
D. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION:
1 City Council:
A. Mayor Dexter to be absent from 4/10/90 meeting
B. Committee Reports (The following represents ad hoc or
standing commitees Informative status reports will, be
given, as felt necessary. )
1 . City/School Committee
2 . North Coastal Transit
3 . S.L.O. Area Coordinating council
4 Traffic Committee
5 . Solid/Hazardous Waste Mgmt. Committee
6 . Recycling Committee Set meeting date with Council
(prior to Earth Day--April 22nd)
7 Economic Opportunity Commission
8 . B.I .A.
9. Downtown Steering Committee
10. General Plan Subcommittee
3
2. City Attorney
3. City Clerk
4-. City Treasurer
5 City Manager
4
G R 0 C L A M A T I 0 N
"TRI--COUNTIES SMALL BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES DAY"
may 2c, 1990
WHEREAS , business enterprise has been a vital part of this
Nation ' s way of lite from its very beginning ; and
WHEREAS, the Tri-Counties Purchasing Outreach Network .
covering Santa Barbara , Ventura and San Luis Obispo Counties , a
non-profit oclanization structured to encourage the growth of
Small , Disadvantaged and WOmen-owned business in our communities,
i5 holding a small Business. Opportunity Day at the Ventura County
fairgrounds on May 22, 1990; and
WHEREAS, bLisines= entrepreneurship in Atascadero , as
throughout Cali •Fornia, is- the gateway to opportunity frnr all in
the free enterprise system and the means by which many of us
continue to build a better life for Ourselves and our families;
and
WHEREAS, small business is especially suited t our,
Atascadero way o lie by =n virtue of this Vitality , scale and
minimal demand for public r
e_.�urc__ , and
WHEREAS, the Tri-Counties Small Business Opportunity Day
Will provide a forum for these outstanding businesses to
interface with heir counterparts in majority Corporate Amer-ica
in an ongoing effort to develop purchases;
NOW, THEREFORE, i • ROI1in Dexter , Mayor of the City c;f
Atascadero , Caii'Ornia . dc hereby proclaim May 2c, 1940, as
SMALL BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES DAY
in our City and urge all Atascaderans to thani, the local
businesses for their contributions to our community and for their
sponsorship of this worthy event .
R0L.LI111 DEXTER, Mavor
City of Atascadero , CA
Dated : March 13, i990
Chumash Council of Camp Fire , Inc.
PHONE (805) 238-4753 P.O. BOX 302 • 244 19th STREET PASO ROBLES, CALIFORNIA 93446
Camp Fire
March 2 , 1990
May we have this presented to the City Council on the
13th of March.
The Children will attend the meeting to receive the
proclamation and to pass out some candy to the Council .
Prehaps this could be placed early on the agenda, so that
the children could leave early.
Sincerely,
i
Janet L. Paver
Executive Director
238-4753
Chumash Council of Camp Fire , Inc.
Camp Fire PHONE (805) 238-4753 P.O. BOX 302 • 244 19th STREET PASO ROBLES. CALIFORNIA 93446
WHEREAS, Camp Fire, the national youth organization, will be
celebrating its 80th birthday on March 17 , 1990 , and
WHEREAS, "the Chumash Council of Camp Fire" in the State of
California and in the City of Atascadero, teach boys
and girls self-reliance and good citizenship; and
WHEREAS, through contemporary programs and by speaking out
on issues that affect youth and their families, today ' s
Camp Fire is helping kids cope with their changing world;
and
WHEREAS, IN Camp Fire, the choices and opportunities are
wide open for boys and girls ; and
WHEREAS , through Camp Fire, young people are learning to
develop confidence and to gain skills needed to become
tomorrow' s leaders ; and
WHEREAS, Camp Fire is commended for the opportunities its
programs offer to young people in the City of Atascadero
and throughout the nation and for the many services
these young people perform for their communities through •
Camp Fire;
NOW, THEREFORE, I , Mayor of the City of
, do hereby officially proclaim March 12
to March 18 , 1990 , to be
CAMP FIRE BIRTHDAY WEEK
in the City of
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have
hereunto set my hand and caused
the Great Seal of the City of
to be affixed at the City Hall
this day of March in the
year of our Lord one thousand
nine hundred and ninety.
Mayor
MEETING TE 13/9 0 AGENDA
ITEM#
ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL
MINUTES
FEBRUARY 27, 1990
Mayor Dexter called the regular meeting of the Atascadero City
County to order at 7:02 p .m. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by
Councilwoman Mackey.
ROLL CALL:
Present : Councilmembers Lilley, Mackey , Borgeson, Shiers
and Mayor Dexter .
Staff Present : Ray Windsor , City Manager ; Henry Engen, Community
Development Director ; Bud McHale, Police Chief ;
Andy Takata, Director of Parks, Recreation and
Zoo ; Art Montandon, City Attorney; Mark Joseph ,
Administrative Services Director ; Gary Sims ,
Senior Civil Engineer ; Lisa Schicker- , City
Arborist and Lee Dayka, City Clerk. .
COUNCIL COMMENTS:
Councilwoman Borgeson expressed concern regarding the proposed
cost increase of using the Chicago Grade Landfill and stated that
she felt this may cause some to dump debris onto other spots to
avoid these fees . She urged the to City establish a central
place for composting and seriously consider the purchase of a
chipper .
Councilwoman Mackey announced that there was to be a tour- of the
Chicago Grade Landfill on Thursday, March 1 at 1 :00 p .m.
Councilwoman Borgeson and Mayor Dexter indicated that they would
like to attend .
The City Manager explained , with the emphasis on waste
management , that the cost of landfill usage will continue to
increase and that the community will be 'looked upon to recycle
and to find alternate ways to deal with trash issues . .
Councilwoman Mackey reported that she had had response from the
public in favor of the City ' s acquisition of a chipper . The City
Manager replied that the issue of the chipper is currently under
study .
CC2!13/90
Page 1
PRESENTATION OF DONATION:
The City Manager introduced Mr . Andrew Stone, Executive Producer
of "My Blue Heaven" . Mr . Stone, representing Warner Bros.
Studios, presented a check in the amount of $5, 000 for the
Lakeside Pavilion Fund to the Mayor and extended warm
appreciation to the City for its ' cooperation in the production
of the film.
PROCLAMATIONS•
Mayor Dexter proclaimed March 7, 1990 as "Arbor Day" and read the
proclamation. Councilwoman Mackey announced that a ceremony
including demonstrations and the planting of a tree in the memory
of the late City Clerk , Boyd C. Sharitz , would commence at 3:00
p .m. in Sunken Gardens on that date.
The Mayor also read a proclamation declaring March 20-21 , 1990 as
American Cancer Society "Daffodil Days" .
In addition, Mayor Dexter read the proclamation establishing
February IB-24, 1990 as National FFA Week and presented it to
Councilwoman Borgeson, who accepted it on behalf of the local FFA
chapter .
CERTIFICATES OF APPRECIATION:
Mayor Dexter presented certificates of appreciation to members of
the Boy Scout Troop 104 for their design and construction of the
bus stop shelter located on E. Mall near Palm Avenue.
COMMUNITY FORUM:
Allen Bristol , 9223 Lucinda Lane, spoke on behalf of a
neighborhood planning group of the 3-F Meadows residential area
of Atascadero and stated that they are seeking alternatives to
the repair of their roads and asked the Council to consider
employing a consultant civil engineer to determine the needs.
Gary Sims, Senior Civil Engineer , described the current situation
and the process of initiating the requested road improvements .
Councilwoman Borgeson asked that staff address the issue and come
back with a report at a future meeting . The City Manager stated
that it would be done and advised a motion to formalize the
matter .
CC2/ 13/90
Page 2
•
MOTION: By Councilwoman Borgeson and seconded by Councilman
Lilley to place this item on a future agenda for
action; approved by common consensus .
CONSENT CALENDAR:
1 . JANUARY 230 1990 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
2. FEBRUARY 13, 1990 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
3. FEBRUARY 260 1990 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
4. CITY TREASURER'S REPORT — JANUARY 1990
5. FINANCE DIRECTOR'S REPORT — JANUARY 1990
6. RESOLUTION NO. 8-90 — AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 76-88, MAKING
CHANGES TO THE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF
ATASCADERO AND RAY WINDSOR, CITY MANAGER 'Cont ' d from
2113/90 )
7. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 24-89, 10750 SANTA ANA — Subdivision of
two lots into three (Kamm/Dohan/Vaughan)
. S. RESOLUTION 23-90 — NOTICE OF COMPLETION/SAN ANDRES STORM
DRAIN
9. ORDINANCE NO. 205 — DELETING THE REQUIREMENT THAT PARKS AND
RECREATION COMMISSIONERS MUST TERMINATE THEIR OFFICE WHEN
SEEKING CITY ELECTIVE OFFICE (Second Reading and Adoption)
10. RESOLUTION NO. 18-90 — AUTHORIZING PARTICIPATION IN THE
JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT WITH S.L.O. COUNTY AND CITIES TO
UPDATE THE NOISE ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN
11 . AWARD BID FOR SOD — TRAFFIC WAY PARK PROJECT
12. RESOLUTION NO. 22-90 — ADOPTING MID—YEAR BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS
(Pursuant to Council action on 2/ 13/90 )
Mayor Dexter read the Consent Calendar . Councilman Lilley asked
to pull item ##11 for discussion and Councilman Shiers asked to
pull item #10 for same.
MOTION: By Councilwoman Mackey and seconded by Councilman
Shiers to approve the Consent Calendar with the
exception of items 10 and 11 ; passed unanimously by
C 13/90
Page
Page 3
roll call vote.
10. RESOLUTION NO. 18-90 — AUTHORIZING PARTICIPATION IN THE
JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT WITH S.L.O. COUNTY AND CITIES TO
UPDATE THE NOISE ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN
Councilman Shiers referred to Section 9 of the Joint Powers
Agreement ( regarding traffic counts and projected future traffic
volumes) and asked that the Del Ric Road area during construction
of the proposed school be included in the study.
Tom Bench , Parks and Recreation Commissioner , asked that the lake
area be included as well , due the on-going controversy with model
speed boat noise.
MOTION: By Councilman Shiers and seconded by Councilwoman
Mackey to approve Resolution No . 18-90; passed
unanimously by roll call vote.
11 . AWARD BID FOR SOD - TRAFFIC WAY PARK PROJECT
Councilman Lilley explained that he had received comments from
the public about the high cost and reason for sodding the
ballfield . He reported that due to the time of the year , laying
sod instead of seeding grass would enable completion in time for
this year ' s softball season.
Councilwoman Mackey stated that she too had received some
complaints about the cost and additional discussion followed .
Councilwoman Borgeson announced that she had received no
complaints but rather positive comments and reiterated that the
Council had already authorized the funds and made a commitment to
the youth of Atascadero . She stated that staff should be
applauded for finding a solution to the problem. Additionally ,
Councilwoman Borgeson asked for clarification of the square
footage of sod to which Mark Joseph reported it to be 87,000 sq .
ft .
Councilman Lilley suggested that the City try and save money
elsewhere in the project , perhaps with volunteered labor .
MOTION: By Councilwoman Borgeson and seconded by Councilman
Lilley to award Bid No . 90-3 for 87,000 sq . ft . of sod
for Traffic Way Park youth sports fields to Gilbert ' s
Landscapes for $28, 662.81 ; passed unanimously by roll
call vote.
CC2/ 1.3/90
Page 4
H. HEARINGS/APPEARANCES:
1 . PAVILION DESIGN — AUTHORIZE FINAL FLOOR PLAN AN PROCEED WITH
WORKING DRAWINGS
The City Manager reported that he, along with the Administrative
Services Director , had determined that the General Fund
Contingency Reserve could be used to supplement this project
along with some certificates of participation. Mr . Windsor
recommended the endorsement of Scheme No . 2 for the Lake Park
Pavilion size (for seating up to 300 people) with an actual floor
plan layout similar to Scheme No . 3, subject to final review and
approval by the Pavilion Citizens Committee and the City Council .
He announced that the architect was present to respond to
questions.
Mr . Windsor stated that this agenda item was a separate issue
from the financing , but that there was an effort through the
Chamber of Commerce and Mrs. Sarah Gronstrand for a grassroots
fund-raising committee to help supplement the monies required to
make the pavilion a reality.
Councilwoman Bor-geson addressed questions to Mark Joseph
regarding the cost estimate and asked that the full fiqure of
what it will take to complete the project be looked at . Mr .
Joseph reported on the cost breakdown of construction and
considerations for potential additional costs . He further stated
that after analyzing the costs and the availability of funds, the
project would be possible without depleting the City ' s reserves .
Councilwoman Mackey expressed her desire to see consideration
given to the historic value of the wooden floor in the present
building . Additional council discussion followed regarding the
use of the flooring and the possible fund-raising sale of floor
pieces as souvenirs.
Councilman Shiers stated that while initially he opted for going
with the less expensive plan, he now believes the smart thing to
do was to go for the larger scheme . He described the building as
one that would be a highlight to the community and given lots of
use.
Councilman Lilley expressed his. delight in the Zeal for public
support and urged the community to rally together to ease the
pressure on the budget reserve.
• CC2/ 13190
Page 5
Public Comments:
Sarah Gronstrand , 7620 Del Rio Road , stated that the old floor
could be put to use and any left overs could be sold as
souvenirs. She read a prepared statement ( see Exhibit A)
announcing the formation of the Friends of the Lake Pavilion
Committee and described its ' goals.
Maggie Rice, Chamber of Commerce, addressed the Council and
corrected that there was not a joint effort by the Chamber of
Commerce and Sarah Gronstrand . She stated that although she,
staff and former Chamber president Mike Arrambide were firmly
committed and deeply involved in raising additional funds to
supplement City funding , this was a concerted effort of
individuals and organizations, including Mrs . Gronstrand and many
members of the Chamber of Commerce. She announced that both she
and Mrs. Gronstrand were each giving $500 and had pledge cards
for those who wanted to contribute.
The City Manager acknowledged his error and stated that he looked
forward to making his own pledge to Ms. Rice. Mr . Windsor
further reported that while the City may not get rich on it , the
facility that would raise some revenue and that money would go
back into the General Fund to assist in other Parks and
Recreation improvements or to pay off the certificates of
participation.
Eric Michielssen, 5300 Aguila, spoke in support of the pavilion
project stressing that fund-raising for it is a meaningful
community goal .
Council Comments:
Mayor Dexter commented that donation to the non-profit
organization would be tax-deductible.
Councilwoman Borgeson explained that her previous reservations
were budgetary and that she was now satisfied that the City could
cover this project and was ready to move forward with it .
Councilman Lilley expressed his wish to see revenue, outside of
maintenance, be earmarked for the Parks, Recreation and Zoo
Department rather than for the General Fund . Further discussion
regarding this issue ensued . Councilwoman Mackey asked if this
would be enterprise fund to which the City Manager stated that
it would , and would be accounted for outside the General Fund .
CC2/ i3/90
Page 6
• Mr . Windsor furthere advised that the Council can make a statement
to the community by passing a resolution outlining the intent for
donated funds and offered to draft such a resolution when timely .
Councilman Shiers thanked Sarah Gronstrand and Maggie Rice for
starting the committee and for their initial donations.
MOTION: By Councilwoman Borgeson and seconded by Councilman
Shiers to endorse Scheme No . 2 for the Lake Park
Pavilion subject to the Pavilion citizens committee and
City Council ; passed unanimously by roll call vote.
Mayor Dexter called for a break at 8:20 p .m. The meeting
reconvened at 8:33 p .m.
2. RESOLUTION 21-90 — AUTHORIZE PROPOSED RED CURBING AT
INTERSECTION OF OLMEDA AND TRAFFIC WAY
Henry Engen gave staff report with the recommendation to adopt
Resolution 21-90 establishing No Parking areas on uimeda and
Traffic Way.
Council discussion followed regarding the intersection and
alternatives to red curbing .
The City Manager stated that what ' s before the Council is a joint
recommendation of the School District and City Staff and that it
is a compromise; given the fact that what was requested was a
crossing guard , which was denied at the Traffic Committee level .
He suggested staggering school hours for the younger children to
relieve some traffic congestion.
In addition, the Mayor and Mr . Engen both stressed that educating
parents, students and motorists to exert caution is crucial .
The City Manager advised that under State law, the City, not the
Schools, is responsible and liable. Discussion pertaining to a
crossing guard ensued and Chief Bud McHale responded to Council
questions . He supported staff recommendation as an alternative
approach to employing a crossing guard .
Additional discussion was held relating to PTA volunteers
crossing children. Councilwoman Mackey stated that the School
District ' s insurance would not cover such a volunteer and that it
was not a viable solution, although she personally disagreed with
the concept . Councilwoman: Horgeson stated that there is more to
life than the cost of insurance and stressed the importance of
protecting children in school . She added that the School
ag 13i 90
Page -,
District should be more aggressive in this concern, and perhaps
I
ook: into a possible waiver .
Public Comment :
Sandy Clark , 9240 Mountain View, described the intersection as
the hardest pick-up area in town with the youngest children
involved . She agreed that redlining would provide more
visibility, but that it would create less parking area.
Councilwoman Borgeson asked the Police Chief whether his
department had any personnel to spare, to which he answered that
all his police officers ' time is dedicated . He reiterated that
the violators are the parents themselves when they double-park
and supported public education to reduce hazard .
MOTION: By Councilwoman Mackey and seconded by Councilman
Lilley to approve Resolution 21-90; passed unanimously
by roll call vote.
3. PROPOSED RELOCATION OF STOP SIGN AT INTERSECTION OF LOS OSOS
ROAD AND OLD MORRO ROAD EAST:
A. RESOLUTION NO. 19-90 - PROPOSING ELIMINATION OF STOP
INTERSECTION ON OLD MORRO ROAD EAST AT LOS OSOS ROAD
(eliminating the existing stop sign, but not
establishing a new stop on Old Morro Road East )
B. RESOLUTION NO. 20-90 - PROPOSING DESIGNATION OF STOP
INTERSECTION ON OLD MORRO ROAD EAST AT LOS OSOS ROAD
(establishing a new stop sign on Old Morro Road east ,
but not eliminating the existing sign on Los Osos Road ,
thereby creating a two-way stop intersection)
Henry Engen gave staff report recommending adopting Resolutions
19-90 and 20-90 eliminating the stop sign at Los Osos Road and
installing a stop sign on Old Morro Road East .
Discussion followed regarding the natural flow of traffic .
Public Comments:
Joan Ok:eefe, 9985 Old Morro Road , opposed the elimination of the
stop sign and described for Council the traffic flow. She
further stated that it is currently the only mechanism to control
traffic speed .
Marjorie Kidwell , 9980 Old Morro Road East , also opposed the
C'C2/ 13/90
Page g
stop elimination of thet sig g n statin that it is difficult to get
a stop sign to begin with and would hate to see it removed simply
because it may be inconvenient to some.
Councilwoman Mackey suggested a continuance to allow the Traffic
Committee to take another look at the matter . The City Manager
agreed this was appropriate.
MOTION: By Councilwoman Mackey and seconded by Councilwoman
Borgeson; passed unanimously by voice vote.
C. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION:
1 . City Council :
A. Fiscal Planning Model - Set date for study session
The City Manager gave his report with suggestions for study
session dates and asked Council to get back to him with a
preference. He clarified that this study session would be a
public meeting of the Council . He further advised that once each
councilmember has let him know their individual preference , the
matter would be placed on the agenda and Council would act upon
it at the ne;:t meeting .
iB. Committee Reports ( The following represents ad hoc or
standing committees . informative status reports will
be given, as felt necessary ) :
1 . City/School Committee - Councilman Lilley reported that
preliminary discussion was held about a gymnasium as
well as the traffic matter that was discussed earlier
( see B-2 ) .
Councilwoman Borgeson asked if minutes were prepared
for these meetings . The City Manager stated that notes
are taken, but they are not recorded . Councilwoman
Borgeson suggested that notes should be given to
Council .
2. North Coastal Transit - No report .
3. S.L.O. Area Coordinating Council - No report .
4. Traffic Committee - No report .
5. Solid/Hazardous Waste Mgt. Committee - No report .
• CC2;' 1 3/9G
Page 9
b. Recycling Committee — Councilwoman Mackey reported that
she had attended a meeting sponsored by the
Garbageman ' s Association and indicated recycling was
the topic of discussion. The City Manager stated that
it was most informative and educational and suggested
inviting this group to come and make a presentation to
the Council and community. There was additional
Council discussion regarding recycling .
*At this time, Council discussed special trips such as the one to
the landfill (see page 1 ) . Mayor Dexter stated that the City
Attorney had reminded him that the Council must observe the Brown
Act and designate two members of the Council to go on this trip .
Councilwoman Mackey stated that on special trips such as this, no
decisions would be made. The City Attorney clarified that their
mere presence at those meetings is not a violation, but cautioned
the Council against standing in a group and deliberate the
benefit/detriments of the landfill . Council was in agreement .
7. Economic Opportunity Commission — Mayor Dexter reported
that new leadership has resulted with a major victory
by restoring funding for family planning and further
reported that the Headstart program is expanding .
8. Finance Committee - No report . •
9. Business Improvement Association - The City Manager
reported that he and Councilman Lilley had attended the
last meeting where discussion of the City Parking Lot
continued . He stated that the Board of Directors were
in support of the City ' s position, but no final
endorsements had been made. The Mayor reported that
the minutes of that meeting were very upbeat and
positive.
10. Downtown Steering Committee — Henry Engen reported that
the preliminary draft will be reviewed at the next
meeting . The date for that meeting is March 8, 1990 at
4:00 p .m. in the Rotunda.
11 . Interim Growth Management Committee — No report .
12. General Plan Sub. Committee — Henry Engen announced the
meeting date as March 7, 1990 at 4 : 30 p .m.
2. City Attorney — No report .
3. City Clerk — No report .
CCC/ 13/90
Page 10
•
4. City Treasurer — No report .
5. City Manager — No report .
THE MEETING WAS ADJOURNED AT 9:20 P.M. UNTIL THE NEXT REGULAR
MEETING.
MTTECORD, D AND PREPARED BY:
1
LEE DAYKA, CITY ERK
Attachment : Exhibit A ( Gronstrand )
• CC2/ 13/90
Page 11
74-
Many people in the community are eagerly awaiting the building
of the Lake Pavilion. A Pavilion which will accomodate a variety •
of group activities from a sewing circle to a discussion group to
weddings, conventions, dances , jazzexcercise to banquets, and many
other activities. The variety of activities which may take place in
the Pavilion is extensive. Logically, the size and scope of the
building must be able to accomodate the variety of uses.
Because of my experience with the library, I am convinced that we
must not scrimp on the size of the Pavilion. Given the mood and
the finances of the County at the time we were building the library,
we had to settle for what we could get. The library was too small
the day it was dedicated, two years ago. We are now faced with
the need to expand. We are faced with higher costs. We are faced
with the inconvenience to expand a building and keeping it in ope-
ration at the same time. We must not, we can not let this happen
to the Pavilion. Let us build it right the first time around.
Because of the limitations of the city' s finances and also being
aware that the building; of the Pavilion presented an excellent •
opportunity for the community members to get together in a common
effort, a committee was formed. The aim of the this committee is to
make possible the building of a first class Pavilion. To do this
we hope to raise a minimum of $100,o00. We have already received
in excess of 10% in pledges.
The committee consists of Mike Arambide and me as Co-Chairs. Anne
Marie Kirkpatrick, Treasurer; Lon Allan, Publicity; Sherry Herman,
Secretary; D;yann Rogers , CPA; f,,ag-ie Rice , Member-at-Large.
You can judge from our widely divergent political view points
that we have to be apolitical in order to work together success-
fully as a committee. And we intend to be successful!
74e hope all of Y•ou will join in helping, us raise money for a
Pavilion which in its use, its grace, and its timeliness, will
be the pride of Atascadero and witho t equal in the county.
Sarah Gronstrand for the
Friends of the Lake Pavilion
Committee
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item: A-2
Through: Ray Windsor, City Manager Meeting Date: 3/13/90
File No: TTM 25-89
From: Henry Engen, Community Development Director pJ,
SUBJECT:
Subdivision of one parcel (6 .7 acres) into four lots of 2 . 17,
1 .60, 1 . 67 , and 1 . 25 acres each. The proposal also includes the
creation of eighty-one (81) commercial condominium units at 5805
Capistrano Avenue (Hotel Park) - Glen Lewis, et al (North Coast
Engineering, agent) .
BACKGROUND
On February 20, 1990, the Planning Commission conducted a public
hearing on the above-referenced subject. On a 5 : 2 vote, the
Commission voted to approve the tract map subject to the
Findings and Conditions of Approval contained in the attached
staff report. There was discussion and public testimony as
referenced in the attached minutes excerpt.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approval of Tentative Tract Map 25-89 as per the Planning
Commission' s recommendation.
HE :ps
Attachment: Staff Report dated February 20, 1990
Minutes Excerpt - February 20, 1990
cc : Glen Lewis, et al
North Coast Engineering
CITY OF ATASCADERO Item: B . 2
STAFF REPORT
FOR: Planning Commission Meeting Date: February 20, 1990
BY: Doug Davidson, Senior Planner File No: TTM 25-89
SUBJECT:
To consider a request to subdivide one parcel (6. 7 acres) into
four lots of 2. 17, 1. 60, 1. 67, and 1. 25 acres each. The proposal
also includes the creation of eighty-one (81) commercial
condominium units.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of Tentative Tract Map 25-89 based on
the Findings for Approval in Exhibit G and Conditions of Approval
in Exhibit H.
SITUATION AND FACTS:
1. Applicant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Glen Lewis, etal.
2. Representative. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .North Coast Engineering
3. Project Address. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5805 Capistrano Ave.
(Hotel Park)
4. Legal Description. . . . . . . . . . . .Parcel 1, PM-17-06
5. Site Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6. 7 acres
6. Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .CR (Commercial Retail)
7. General Plan Designation. . . . .Retail Commercial
8. Existing Use. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Commercial center under
construction
9. Environmental Status. . . . . . . . .Negative Declaration
previously posted
August 31, 1987.
1
BACKGROUND:
Precise Plan 30-87 became effective on December 8, 1987 (see
Exhibit F) . This approval established the conditions for
development of a 69, 696 square feet commercial retail and office
project. During the processing of grading permits, questions
were raised about the adequacy of the approved tree protection
plans, particulary toward the eight (8) California White Oaks
that were approved for retention under the Precise Plan. After
several public hearings and arborist reports, letters of credit
in the total amount of $80, 003. 00 were deposited with the City to
ensure protection of these native oaks. If a certified arborist
determines that no damage has occured during construction around
the oaks, the letters of credit will be returned upon final
building inspection. Upon this agreement, site grading permits
were issued and construction of Phase One commenced.
The current request seeks to subdivide the property for ownership
and financing purposes. In addition to the four lot subdivision
of the property, the applicant is proposing the creation of
individual airspace condominiums for the eighty-one (81)
commercial units. As the following analysis indicates, the staff
is not concerned with the ownership of the property, but with the
orderly development of the site in light of previous project
approvals.
ANALYSIS:
There is no minimum lot size in the CR (Commercial Retail) zone.
Minimum lot sizes are determined by market factors and
development constraints. In this case, the proposed lot lines
generally conform to the approved phasing plan of the Precise
Plan. The one noticeable exception is that the parking area in
the center of the site is shown on the Tract Map as Phase IV, and
on the Precise Plan as part of Phase I. This variation poses no
problems , because construction permits have been issued for
Building #4 (units 33-40) , including the required parking area
associated with Phase I of the Precise Plan. Furthermore,
reciprocal access and parking agreements are required to ensure
that the project functions as a whole, and not as fragmented
units.
Staff notified all the pertinent utility companies and City
departments of this proposed subdivision. All of these agencies
had the same response - that the development plans were
previously approved under the Precise Plan and building permit
review and that consistency should be maintained with the Precise
Plan approval.
2
Ordinarily, a phased subdivision of real property with the
concurrent creation of airspace condominiums would be a complex
final map process. Again, with a previous approval and project
construction underway, it is a matter of ensuring consistency
between the phasing schedules. Conditions on both the Tract Map
and the Precise Plan guarantee that the necessary improvements
will be constructed with each phase.
Finally, this proposed subdivision is a vesting tentative map.
The approval or conditional approval of a vesting tentative map
confers a vested right to proceed with development in substantial
compliance with the ordinances, policies, and standards in effect
at the time the map is approved. All the additional information
required for submittal of a vesting map in Section 11-5. 003 of
the Subdivision Ordinance has been submitted, reviewed, and
approved under the Precise Plan.
CONCLUSIONS:
The Precise Plan conditions, with a corresponding subdivision
approval linking the phasing, will ensure that the site is
developed in a comprehensive manner.
ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A - Zoning Map
Exhibit B - General Plan Map
Exhibit C - Tentative Tract Map
Exhibit D - Grading Plan (approved)
Exhibit E - Supplemental Development Statement
Exhibit F - Precise Plan 30-87
Exhibit G - Findings for Approval
Exhibit H - Conditions of Approval
•
3
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF AT-ASCADERO
ZONING . .
OMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
TTM 25-89DEPARTMENT
AID
■
• � Via-=' ■■ '�
Mims 16
AIR
Alaw
zip
in
2q a
.
1 "14
SIP
.i ►�9
EXHIBIT B
CITY OF ATASCADERO
`Ii 1 I ;�1 • M•�
GENERAL PLAN MAP
V, "S10
�c�' iscn COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TTM 25-89
DEPARTMENT
ItYVVJ I. .-
PAR K
c !
! RECREATION !�
C, !
W JI
ati4o+�„ � � HIGH DEN. RECREATION: C
>o j -DENSITY s
a
&JH-
HIGH
S I T C LIC \_ DENS. 0 soh
- M.F. _ DEN
E T a. u
�OMMCR'CIAL
Pik
I � � � � I I I I I i �•
Ifit
G""__
G
\ 1 r
'1 11 WJE _i � ��._ ✓t i.. ` ,
AVE - 114sc4oE �� -�•
Z
PUBL-IC <
�►NDAEs
Q&T
T
_ EXHIBIT C
CITY OF ATASADERO TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
»•�''ue —'�e »�• TTM 25-89
� c COMMUNITY DE 'FLOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
r �a iMal
JOIN
fP
:�tl te-
�
4
..OY
a _
0
f
A.
y z n'"c i� Si3 m
$m rn aj lstA
xi r gXc�
Z fr1 y "gtE: m
sill
R�
Zq
12 m
3 OD t � €
s
a
�• EXHIBIT D
CITY OF ATASCADER
'�• = O GRADING PLAN (HOTEL PARK)
c COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TTM 25-89
DEPARTMENT
. j
�0� a
Vis'+'►� � _ .,
?Air-
� o
it
Elf
Al
IT
IL\ �
I '
i � � sH?•t� «.. ti
_
7`<
ppp `-k,_• _ \ \may :�, ��
in
s �F • •! .rV � f� R.r
+ • err >m< .
nzm
ILI
i
::,:�;,,., -�to �� _ •,l i
i
! A! WmFl
E Y
CA
4 00
1
T—
EXHIBIT E
NOV 2;2 191S
DEVELOPER'S STATEMENT
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 1858
Vesting Tentative Tract 1858 is a subdivision for condominium
purposes (conversion) of the Hotel Park Commercial Center devel-
opment previously approved as Precise Plan 87-30. The tentative
map as submitted proposed no changes to the approved project.
Treatment of grading, tree protection, and utility construction
are as approved for the Hotel Park Development. Final plans for
all onsite grading and utilities, and offsite streets and utili-
ties have been prepared and approved by the City.
TOPOGRAPHY. The tentative tract map indicates the existing con-
tours prior to construction of the Hotel Park project. Construc-
tion of the Hotel Park Phase 1 facilities has been commenced and
the site has been partially graded. Improvements to Capistrano
Avenue and South Mall Extension have been completed with the
exception of the creek crossing. The finished grades for the
project are as proposed under Precise Plan 87-30 and the approved
grading plan is attached as Sheet 2 of the tentative map submit-
tal to indicate what the final project appearance will be.
PHASING. The tentative map is broken down into four lots that
reflect the approved phasing plan for project. It is anticipated
that as the first phase of construction is completed, a final map
and associated condominium plan would be recorded. The right is
reserved to record several phases or the entire project at one
time if all of the Conditions of Approval have been satisfied.
The initial map that records will establish the C.C. &R's for the
project as well as a Homeowners Association. The necessary
easements for reciprocal access and parking and maintenance would
be incorporated into these documents. If only one phase is
initially recorded, subsequent phases would be annexed into the
original Owners Association to prevent duplicity of C.C. &R's,
easements, etc.
X&Y441�f� 22-
tevenvester
•
Authori d presentative
pin/87108dev.stm
EXHIBIT F
ADMINISTRATION BUILDING
POST OFFICE BOX 747
ATASCADERO,CALIFORNIA 93423
POLICE DEPARTMENT
PHONE: (805) 466-8000
POST OFFICE BOX 747
ATASCADERO. CALIFORNIA 93423
CITY COUNCIL PHONE: (805) 466-8600
CITY CLERK tasea el®
CITY TREASURER
CITY MANAGER INCORPORATED JULY 2. 1578
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 6005 LEWIS AVENUE
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ATASCADERO,CALIFORNIA 93422
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT PHONE: (805) 466.2141
November 24, 1987
Mr. Don Messer
P.O. Box 1958
Atascadero, CA 93423
SUBJECT: Precise Plan 30-87
5805 Capistrano
Dear Mr. Messer:
The City of Atascadero reviewed your application for a precise plan
and environmental determination for the construction of a 69, 696
'square foot office/retail project comprised of ten (10) buildings, one
restaurant and site improvements. This review and approval includes
the requested adjustments, submittal of color boards and, as discussed
in previous meetings, revised conditions. A Negative Declaration has
been previously granted.
The proposed precise plan is approved as shown on attached Exhibit B
(site plan) , Exhibit C (fire hydrants) , and subject to the conditions
of approval listed in Exhibit F. ' Final approval becomes effective at
5:00 p.m. , December 8, 1987, unless appealed. (NOTE: THIS DOES NOT
CONSTITUTE A BUILDING OR GRADING PERMIT) .
In the event you intend to appeal any of the conditions, your appeal
should be in writing and should state the reasons for the appeal. Any
appeal would be scheduled for Planning Commission consideration as a
public hearing. You should, however, discuss any objections to the
conditions with the planning staff as it may *be possible to alter con-
ditions after such discussion.
.,1
If you should have any questions concerning this project, you are wel-
come to contact the Community Development Department for assistance.
Sincerely,
DOUaXavidson
Associate Planner
City of Atascadero
DD:C
cc: Gary Swauger
Attachments: Exhibit A - Location Map
Exhibit B - Site Plan
Exhibit C - Required Fire Hydrants
Exhibit D - Development Statement
Exhibit E - Findings for Approval
Exhibit F - Conditions of Approval
r,
o�
4-5
■
• ,rte •% •� ur :: ►Mb-
MW ♦� ��•••• .
r �_ � .. - •��MAN
.:. 111 . .•
•` " i`
y ln�u uu_ . ,Ii� Vi
Maftli .�. �i •�►
Ar
111 ����1J�•u `. �: gill
IPA
op
Is F-OP,
ILI
.:
24 x MR Plo
SITE DATA: s' /
LOT AREA:211,710 SOJT.4.72 ACRES g _
MIK:CPNRCIAL MAIL /
WILDING CV41AGI: 71,57/SO.R IS.n l/vv
rutin AAO OIIt1I1A111: 110,101$411. Is
WAUWn: 1.171 Sim. i.n
13CCs AW VMS: 1.110 SO•R. 1.11 b /
LAAOSPPIro 13.17110.12. 21.6
tMiS/RANG ARE.R,O.w: 12.255 so.R. Itis
AFASCADPD PLIC IAAR: 11.110 W-FT. 1,2s
ISUILDI IX DATA:
RETAIL AAD OIRCE SPACE:
LOWER!1000:10 WILDINGS AT 2170 SO.ET. 21.000 SO.R. /
UPPER FLOOR:10 WILDING&AT 1112 10.FT. 11.IM SO.FI.
rROXCT mru a // /i / ♦• -'b .''..',`c1''T`:.`a:.a:
• 8•/ / _ ~ _1102. L.�OK.I.'•._
PARK SND DATA:
211 stAroAro 1'dP SMttl /• / / /-S,.. 1 q.,• :'i
1 MAN01C1 t'NI'SPACES RtIR 1'lOAptR/ / '•
t CO,iACf CES s►AC[f b • / s / _ .E1 tl,
""AI SPACES /•• / f 0 J /� 111 E
66s WILDIM AREA PER PACE:su 34•R./STALL i '• ,� ,1- S. t1P • ,c t
/ 0
101
I lil /� 1 4./ ; �-,-, 00 N�nt • • ��t MT I
vv 7
L • ''••• • •• Y'
ot'' 7 g -i
v�\� Joy• ••e�•
THREE \iro. ONE ` - , 8 � E•/l.itj
• vain Cf 1..1 �. `�...�. ,�.
-1
s'Tgnm AL.AN
CX H H; iT 13
iT"t FLA!tj
• 1
SITE DATA:
lot ERtAI 291.SN 14.11.9.38 Opti
ZONING:COMOCIAt RETAIL
altotNG COvttAOt: 79.111E".17 33.21
PARING AIB atYMtTS: INGJet fo•ri. 3T.ii 4' / / -
OEM AN: 3.Tt1 fo.►T.
OIpS too silos: 2.190 30I.
CANGSprING p.33814.It. 31.0
WISIIA•e ATt.1,e.r.: 31J11 sort. IL If Q /!
aMSdptfO CRIER eANG: 38.130 fo.►T. oa /
BUILDING DATA: / / / y
MAIL ANG MICE S►ACE: / / / o l
LOr11 11000:!0 fullolNGs AT"is SO.".
UPPER PLACING:le eYIt01NG!AT fll!fo.►T. 11.120 f0•►T.
/10JLCi IOTAt / / ! •`r I'• o•'.1+.aa
• 8•� % ! • ai•+c t+
PARKING DATA:- ti ,�� • _�ws. �.+s+i.r'_"_
211 stiNGA10 1'138'SPACES /� %/ ,• ( !.• •t •��-1,. •.'
Ib:
t PACES
rONGKca"CAP 1••19•PACES WIN 1•tOOOING
TOTAL fPApf b �• ..� S '�. ! { .lYs� % ��,i 1��•f
e001f 9UI101NG AREA PER 3►Api 202 f0•ri./fTAll ~ / •• / •' / !�• ' ` -
JAI
41
On I
It
tier /'M%/ �'!• r s"c'F�': : i� "{�• •••, Q /
3117/ T 4'/ - Co �-•'. ••y�►+r•••
o� / • •( /
� L A• / � roti • � a•
• �F 114 / ! / • +s,� 1
�\ Q�' ••a THREE ` bbb a /
...rJa�L e.aiiii[e+•uo 4 �., ``�^ .. 4-t
• EX H l9iT L-
FIRE HYDRANTS--- �
gary mt a gch d swau Er architEct
and associates
HOTEL PARK
DEVELOPER STATEMENT
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
HOTEL PARK BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL CENTER IS A FOUR PHASE RETAIL, OFFICE,
AND RESTAURANT COMPLEX CONSISTING OF ELEVEN BUILDINGS, TOTALLING 69,696
SQ.FT.ON A 291,780 SQ. FT. OR 6.70 AC. SITE.
PHASE ONE: FIVE TWO-STORY RETAIL AND OFFICE BUILDINGS OF 6072 SQ.FT.
EACH, TOTALLING 30,360 SQ.FT: ; COVERING 137,614 SQ.FT.OR 3.16 AC.
OF SITE AREA.
PHASE TWO: THREE TWO-STORY RETAIL AND OFFICE BUILDINGS OF 6072 SQ.FT.
EACH, TOTALLING 18,216 SQ.FT. ; COVERING 56,589 SQ.FT. OR 1.3 AC.
OF SITE AREA. .
PHASE THREE:TWO TWO-STORY RETAIL AND OFFICE BUILDINGS OF 6072 SQ.FT.
EACH, TOTALLING 12,144 SQ.FT. ; COVERING 72,464 SQ.FT. OR 1.66 AC.
OF SITE AREA.
PHASE FOUR: 300 SEAT ONE STORY RESTAURANT OF 8976 SQ.FT. , COVERING
25,133 SQ.FT. OR .58 AC. OF SITE AREA.
ALONG WITH THE PRECISE PLAN APPLICATION, WE ARE SUBMITTING A PARCEL MAP TO
DIVIDE THE PROJECT INTO FOUR PARCELS. THE PARCEL LINES WILL GENERALLY
FOLLOW THE PHASING LINES. IT IS THE INTENT OF THE DEVELOPER TO FURTHER
SUBDIVIDE THE PROJECT INTO AIRSPACE CONDOMINIUMS, AT A LATER DATE, TO ALLOW
SEPARATE OWNERSHIP OF INDIVIDUAL SHOPS AND OFFICES. IT WOULD BE PREMATURE AT
THIS POINT TO APPLY FOR THE CONDOMINIUM, SINCE TENANTS HAVE NOT BEEN
DETERMINED AT THIS TIME.
PROJECT DESIGN:
THE SITE HAS EXISTING OR PROPOSED ROADS ON THREE SIDES, TOTALLING 66% OF THE
PERIMETER. THERE IS OVER 40 FEET OF ELEVATION CHANGE WITHIN THE SITE.
EVERY EFFORT HAS BEEN MADE TO SAVE THE EXISTING WHITE OAK TREES ON THE SITE,
AND TO MINIMIZE ALTERATION OF LANDFORMS. THE SIX TREES ALONG CAPISTRANO
AVENUE WILL HAVE TO BE REMOVED TO ACCOMODATE THE REQUIRED ROAD WIDENING.
ONLY FIVE TREES WITHIN THE PROJECT WILL HAVE TO BE REMOVED, WITH TWENTY-SIX
REMAINING.
post office box 1177 cambria california 93428 805 927 3987
2450 main suite c 5850 west mall
cambria california atascadero california
80S 927 3987 805 466 0886
EAH IBIT D
DEV ELDPEQ
STATE M E�J T
� O
gary michael swauger architEct
and associates
HOTEL PARK
DEVELOPER STATEMENT PAGE 2
PARKING CALCULATIONS:
SINCE TENANTS , HAVE NOT BEEN DETERMINED AT THIS TIME, WE HAVE CALCULATED THE
PARKING BASED ON A MIX OF USES WITH HIGHER INTENSITIES THAN ANTICIPATED.
THIS WILL PROVIDE MORE PARKING THAN REQUIRED BY CITY ORDINANCES.
BUILDINGS 1-10: LOWER FLOOR
THREE EATING AND DRINKING ESTABLISHMENTS AT 740 SQ.FT. EACH, 2220
SQ.FT. TOTAL.
25% KITCHEN=555 SQ.FT. AT 100 SQ.FT./SPACE 6 SPACES
75% EATING 1665 SQ.FT. AT 60 SQ.FT./SPACE 28 SPACES
EMPLOYEES=27 TABLES AT 6 TABLES/SPACE 6 SPACES
THREE FOOD AND BEVERAGE SALES AT 740 SQ.FT. EACH, 2220 SQ.FT.
TOTAL.
2240 SQ.FT. AT 200 SQ.FT./SPACE 12 SPACES
SEVENTY FOUR GENERAL MERCHANDISE SHOPS AT 740 SQ.FT. EACH, 25,160
SQ.FT. TOTAL.
25,160 SQ.FT. AT 350 SQ.FT./SPACE 72 SPACES
SUB-TOTAL 124 SPACES
BUILDINGS 1-10: UPPER FLOOR
FORTY OFFICES AT 778 SQ.FT. EACH, 31,120 SQ.FT. TOTAL.
40 OFFICES AT 2 SPACES/OFFICE 80 SPACES
RESTAURANT:
8896 SQ.FT. TOTAL, 33% KITCHEN AREA, 67% DINING AREA
2962 SQ.FT. KITCHEN AT 100 SQ.FT./SPACE 30 SPACES
6014 SQ.FT. DINING AT 20 SQ.FT./SEAT=300 SEATS
300 SEATS AT 1 SPACE/4 SEATS 75 SPACES
EMPLOYEES: 75 TABLES AT 6 TABLES/SPACE 13 SPACES
SUBTOTAL 118 SPACES
TOTAL 322 SPACES
THE SHARED ON-SITE PARKING ADJUSTMENT AS PER 9-4.115(f) ALLOWS A REDUCTION
OF 20%. THIS WOULD REDUCE THE REQUIRED PARKING TO 258 SPACES. THE PROJECT
PROVIDES 266 SPACES. WE ARE REQUESTING THE 20% PARKING ADJUSTMENT.
post office box 1177 cambria california 93428 805 927 3987
2450 main suite c 5850 west mall
cambria california atascadero california
BO5 927 3987 805 466 0886
40
EJCH I LIT D f"
EXHIBIT E - FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL
Precise Plan 30-87
5805 Capistrano (Messer/Swauger)
1. The proposed project or use is consistent with the General Plan.
2. The proposed project or use satisfies all applicable provisions of
this Title.
3. The establishment, and subsequent operation or conduct of the use
will not, because of the circumstances and conditions applied in
the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety or wel-
fare of the general public or persons residing or working in the
neighborhood of the use, or be detrimental or injurious to prop-
erty or improvements in the vicinity of the use.
4. The proposed project or use will not be inconsistent with the
character of the immediate neighborhood or contrary to its orderly
development.
5. The proposed use or project will not generate a volume of traffic
beyond the safe capacity of all roads providing access to the pro-
ject, either existing or to be improved in conjunction with the
project, or beyond the normal traffic volume of the surrounding
neighborhood that would result from full development in accordance
with the Land Use Elemerrt.
6. The appearance of the project is in compliance with the City' s
Appearance Review Guidelines.
.r
EXHIBIT F - CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Precise Plan 30-87
5805 Capistrano (Messer/Swauger)
1. All construction shall be in conformance with Exhibit B (site
plan) , Exhibit C (fire hydrants) , Exhibit F (conditions of ap-
proval) , and shall comply to all applicable City codes and ordin-
ances. Any modification to this approval shall be approved by the
Community Development Department prior to implementing any
changes.
2. Complete landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to, and
subsequently approved by, the Community Development Department,
prior to issuance of building permits (Section 9-4.124) . The fol-
lowing items shall be noted or detailed on these plans:
a. All areas including setbacks, parking lots, and unused areas
shall be landscaped appropriately (Section 9-4.125 (a) ) .
b. Concrete curbing, or a functional equivalent, shall be pro-
vided to enclose all required landscaping.
C. All existing trees with a diameter of eight (8) inches or
more shall be shown.. Trees which are to be removed shall be
noted as such. A tree protection plan, including fencing and
other necessary measures to protect existing oaks, shall be
submitted for approval by the Community Development Depart-
ment prior to the issuance of a building permit.
d. Proposed landscaping shall be accompanied with a planting
schedule which includes species, container sizes, number of
plants or flats, and the space distribution of ground cover .
Replacement oak trees shall be planted along the extension of
Highway 41.
e. Ten percent (10%) of the parking area shall be landscaped
with shade trees approximately 30 feet on center.
f. Five (5) foot of landscaped area with six (6) foot fencing is
required along the northeasterly property line.
g. Where parking spaces are arranged to head toward a street, a
three (3) foot high landscaped berm is required.
3. One (1) trash enclosure for each phase shall be provided with ap-
propriate details (Section 9-4. 129) as shown on Exhibit B. Please
note that the construction standards require the bottom of the
trash enclosure area to be concrete or an equivalent impervious
material. Trash facilities shall be integrated into the design of
the building (s) that they serve.
4. Three (3) fire hydrants shall be installed at the locations desig-
nated in Exhibit C, prior to combustible construction occurring
on-site.
5. A grading and drainage plan prepared by a registered civil en-
gineer shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development
and Public Works Departments prior to the issuance of building
permits. These plans shall include the following:
a. Soils report
b. Earthwork quantity
C. Retaining walls to be coordinated with future Highway 41 im-
provements.
d. Measures to reduce velocity of water and erosion on and off
the site.
All grading/drainage work is to be completed prior to final build-
ing inspection.
6. Structural plan check will occur during building permit process-
ing, however , the following preliminary items have been noted:
a. Four foot deck cannot project into the ten (10) foot setback
(unless non-combustible) .
b. One (1) hour protection is required for walls less than 20
feet from property line.
C. Some buildings maybe classified as three (3) story.
7. The submitted plans are generally in compliance with the City' s
Appearance Review Guidelines with the exception of the following:
a. Mechanical equipment is to be screened including: roof-
mounted, PG&E facilities, and trash enclosures.
b. A master signage plan requires approval prior to issuance of
sign permits. Projects with over 1.00 square feet of signage
require a conditional use permit.
C. Provision of outdoor public seating areas.
d. Elevation or cross-section showing landscaping in relation to
buildings.
e. Exterior lighting is not shown.
8 . A 12 ' 6" setback is required along full Highway 41 property front-
age.
9. Two hundred sixty-six (266) parking spaces shall be provided. The
slope of the parking area cannot exceed 7%. This includes the is
granting of an 18% parking adjustment and a parking area slope
adjustment to exceed 5%. No further adjustments shall be granted.
1
10. A traffic report shall be prepared, supplemental to the ARE, Inc.
Atascadero Creek Bridge study (November, 1987) . The report shall
analyze the traffic impacts generated by this project and present
recommendations for mitigation measures, if necessary. Special
attention will be given to the Santa Ysabel/Highway 41 intersec-
tion, the Capistrano/Lewis Avenue intersection, and the Capis-
trano/West Mall intersection.
11. The applicant shall obtain an encroachment permit from Caltrans
for work within their right-of-way. Caltrans shall verify that
plans are compatible with plans for Highway 41, including 28 foot
wide access drives.
12. Applicant shall obtain a sewer connection permit from the Public
Works Department prior to hooking up to the public sewer. Appli-
cant shall pay all sewer fees in effect at the time of obtaining
permits for sewer service and fees in effect at time of connec-
tion.
13. Applicant shall obtain an encroachment permit from the Public
Works Department and sign an inspection agreement and a curb and
gutter agreement, guaranteeing that the work will be done and in-
spections paid for, prior to issuance of a building permit, and
construct improvements as directed by the encroachment permit
prior to final building inspection.
14. Road improvement plans, including drainage, prepared by a regis-
tered civil engineer, shall be submitted to and approved by the
Community Development arrd Public Works Departments prior to issu-
ance of building permits for Phase I, unless otherwise specified.
These plans shall include :
a. Curb, gutter , five (5) foot sidewalk, and 20 foot paveout
from centerline on Lewis Avenue (South Mall Extension) . Con-
struction of Lewis Avenue (South Mall Extension) shall term-
inate at the northwesterly curb return of the Capis-
trano/Lewis Avenue (South Mall Extension) intersection. Fu-
ture construction shall be bonded f&r west of the above term-
ination and shall eventually terminate easterly of the exist-
ing creek tributary to Atascadero Creek, and the profile of
Lewis Avenue (South Mall Extension) will be established ade-
quate to provide transition to the proposed bridge crossing.
The easterly termination shall match the westerly termination
of the Bank of America development of Lewis Avenue (South
Mall Extension) .
b. Construction of Capistrano within new alignment, as
determined by the City Engineer . This shall include curb,
gutter and sidewalk on the easterly side of Capistrano along
property frontage, as well as a pedestrian linkage with the
Atascadero Creek bridge. Pedestrian access is also needed
from Lewis Avenue (South Mall Extension) to Highway 41 by the
addition of an on-site sidewalk parallel to the primary pro-
ject access on Lewis Avenue (South Mall Extension) .
C. The possible reconstruction of vertical curve on Capistrano
as determined by the City Engineer . The vertical curve on
Capistrano will be evaluated to satisfy a 30 mph design speed
and a stop condition at Lewis Avenue.
d. Future road improvements for Highway 41 shall be compatible
with approved highway plans as determined by Caltrans. These
shall include curb, gutter, and sidewalk, and refer to the
Caltrans plans showing the required left-turn channelization.
Prior to issuance of permits for Phase III development, these
highway plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City and
Caltrans.
e. Road improvements for all three street frontages shall in-
clude provisions for street trees. Construction of road im-
provements shall be completed (or bonded for) prior to the
final building inspection for Phase I , with the exception of
the required Highway 41 improvements which shall be completed
(or bonded for) prior to final building inspection for Phase
III.
15. The applicant shall make the following offers of dedication:
a. Offer of dedication on Capistrano Avenue as shown on map, and
as determined by the City Engineer.
b. Additional offer of dedication on Capistrano at frontage of
proposed Parcel A as determined by the City Engineer .
C. A six (6) foot public utility easement along full frontage of
Lewis Avenue (South Mall Extension) and Highway 41.
d. An open space easement dedication along the creek to the west
side of new alignment of Capistrano.
e. All offers of dedication shall be completed and recorded
prior to or simultaneously to final '•building inspection.
16. Each phase shall meet all development standards of the Zoning Or-
dinance including access, parking, landscaping, and trash enclo-
sure. The phasing of public improvements shall also be provided
to ensure that each phase functions independently. Phase II de-
velopment requires provision of an additional access drive, either
by connection with the Bank of America parking lot or future High-
way 41.
17. The road abandonment (portion of Capistrano remaining after re-
alignment) shall be recorded prior to issuance of permits for
Phase I.
18. All development fees in effect at the time of issuance of permits
will be paid by the applicant, and any credits will be determined
as per ordinance.
19. All existing and new utilities shall be placed underground. All
relocation and/or alteration of existing utilities shall be the
responsibility of the developer at his sole expense.
20. This precise plan is approved for a period of one year from the
date of final approval. (December 8, 1987) . Where a project phas-
ing schedule has been approved, construction permits shall be ob-
tained and substantial work shall be performed on at least one
approved building within that one year period. Construction must
continue at a reasonable pace with no interruption greater than
180 consecutive days.
�r
EXHIBIT G - Findings for Approval
Tentative Tract Map 25-89 (Tract 1858)
5805 Capistrano Ave. (Hotel Park)
February 20, 1990
ENVIRONMENTAL FINDING:
The proposed project will not have a significant impact on the
environment. The Negative Declaration previously prepared for
the project is adequate.
MAP FINDINGS:
1. The proposed map is consistent with the applicable
General or Specific Plan.
2. The design and/or improvements of the proposed subdivision
is consistent with the applicable General or Specific Plan.
3. The site is physically suitable for the proposed type of
development.
4. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of
development.
5. The design of the subdivision, as conditioned, and the
proposed improvements, will not cause substantial
environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure
fish and wildlife or their habitat.
6. The design of the subdivision, and the type of the
improvements, will not conflict with easements acquired by
the public at large for access through or the use of
property within the proposed subdivision; or substantially
equivalent alternate easements are provided.
7. The design of the subdivision and/or the type of proposed
improvements will not cause serious health problems.
EXHIBIT H - Conditions of Approval
Tentative Tract Map 25-89
5805 Capistrano Ave. (Hotel Park)
February 20, 1990
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1 . Water shall be obtained from the Atascadero Mutual Water
Company and water lines shall exist at the frontage of each
parcel prior to recording the final map.
2. All existing and proposed utility easements, pipelines, and
other easements are to be shown on the final map. If there
are building or other restrictions related to the easements,
they shall be noted on the final map. The open space lots
shall be designated as Public Utility Easements.
3. Prior to recording any final map, a phasing plan recording
sequence shall be submitted for review and acceptance by the
City Engineer and Community Development Director. The
phasing plan shall include the phasing of the construction
of the required public improvements.
4. The applicant shall establish Covenants, Conditions, and
Restrictions (CC&Rs) for the regulation of land use, control
of nuisances, and architectural control of the site and the
building (s) .
a. These CC&Rs shall be submitted for review and approval
by the City Attorney and the Community Development
Director prior to the approval of the final map.
b. These CC&Rs shall provide for common ingress, egress,
and parking on all driveways and designated parking
areas.
C. These CC&Rs shall be administered by a Condominium
Owners Association.
5. A reciprocal agreement, in a form acceptable to the City
Attorney, shall be recorded with the deed to each parcel at
the time it is first conveyed, and a note to this effect
shall be placed on the final map(s) , covering:
a. ingress and egress
b. parking
C. sewer, water, utilities, and storm water facilities.
6. A soils report or an Engineer' s certification stating that
existing soils on the site are adequate to support the
proposed structure as per Chapter 70, subsection (e) of the
Uniform Building Code shall be provided prior to the
recording of the final map.
7. A final map, in compliance with all conditions set forth
herein, shall be submitted for review and approval in
accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City Lot
Division Ordinance prior to recordation.
a. Monuments shall be set at all new property corners
created and a Registered Civil Engineer or Licensed
Land Surveyor shall indicate, by certificate on the
final map, that corners have been set or shall be set
by a date specific and that they will be sufficient to
enable the survey to be retraced.
b. A recently updated preliminary title report shall be
submitted for review in conjunction with the processing
of the final map.
8. Approval of this tentative map shall expire two years from
the date of final approval unless an extension of time is
granted pursuant to a written request prior to the
expiration date.
PAGE FOUR MINUTES EXCERPT — PLANNING COMMISSION
2/20/90
2 . The site is not physically su ble for the proposed
type of development.
3 . The site is not physic y suitable for the proposed
density of developme
(Flag Lot Findings)
1 . The =divisiis not consistent with the character of
the ghb ood.
2 . The f g lot is not justified by topographical
co tions.
The motion carried 6 : 1 with Commissioner Hanauer
dissenting.
2. TENTATIVE TRACT NAP 25-8g :
Application filed by Glen Lewis, et al (North Coast
Engineering) to subdivide one parcel (6 .7 acres) into
four lots of 2 .17, 1 .60, 1.67 and 1 .25 acres each. The
proposal also includes the creation of 81 commercial
condominium units. Subject site is located at 5805
Capistrano Avenue (Hotel Park) .
Doug Davidson presented the staff report and provided a
background concerning the prior precise plan approval for
this property. He noted that staff is not concerned with
the ownership of this property, but with the orderly
development of the site in light of previous project
approvals. Staff is recommending approval subject to eight
conditions.
Commission questions and discussion followed.
Commissioner Luna asked questions relative to vesting
commercial maps and estimated time frames for completion of
the various phasings for the map; he expressed concern with
the timeliness of the completion of the project.
Mr. Davidson responded that the map approval is tied
together with the precise plan in assuring that all
necessary requirements will be complied with.
There was continued discussion relative to project
commitment concerning the amount of work to date which has
included substantial site grading.
Commissioner Luna inquired whether any provisions have been
made for passive and natural heating and cooling design for
the buildings . Mr. Davidson responded that the Subdivision
ordinance contains a guideline for the orientation of the
buildings. In this case, all four of the lots do not meet
PAGE FIVE MINUTES EXCERPT - PLANNING COMMISSION
2/20/90
the guideline; however, the four lots contain adequate space
for solar exposure and the building orientation is adequate
for same.
Commissioner Brasher asked for clarification on provisions
for architectural control.
Commissioner Lopez-Balbontin asked who will be responsible
for assuring that all the necessary requirements are
complied with after the property assumes different owners .
Mr. Davidson explained that with the tract map and precise
plan, orderly processing will be insured with a change of
ownership.
Commissioner Hanauer stated that he felt there has been an
incredible commitment to the project with a considerable
amount of money invested already.
In response to question from Commissioner Waage, Mr.
Davidson explained that the letters of credit are individual
for a total of $80,000 ( for eight trees) , and are worded
such that prior to final building inspection of a particular
phase, then the certificates can be returned (provided no
tree damage has occurred) . Discussion followed.
Commissioner Brasher expressed concern that the fencing
around the protected trees is too close and way under the
dripline with a lot of undercutting being done to the roots .
Steve Sylvester with North Coast Engineering, representing
the applicant, stated his concurrence with the recommenda-
tion and added that staff has done an excellent job of
protecting the City against issues such as potential
problems of multiple ownerships, phasing of the project,
tree protection, erosion control etc. He pointed out the
substantial significant expense paid by the developer prior
to seeing any return on the project, and that it is the
applicant' s intent to see this development through to
completion.
Mr. Sylvester spoke about vesting maps for a commercial
project adding that you would never see this much detail on
any other project that would come to you as a vesting
tentative map.
Mr. Sylvester explained his understanding of the purpose and
intent of vesting maps for commercial projects . Discussion
continued relative to the difference between commercial and
residential vesting maps.
Commissioner Waage expressed concern with access off of
Highway 41 to the proposed restaurant.
PAGE SIX MINUTES EXCERPT - PLANNING COMMISSION
2/20/90
MOTION: Made by Commissioner Highland and seconded by
Commissioner Hanauer to approve Tentative Tract
Map 25-89 subject to the Findings and Conditions
of Approval contained in the staff report.
Commissioner Luna stated he would not support the motion and
in referencing Attorney General opinion (No. 80-702)
regarding passive natural heating and cooling design
requirements, he could not see how the precise plan as
approved could satisfy the City' s Subdivision Ordinance
(Section No. 11-8.203) .
In response to question from Commissioner Hanauer, Mr.
Decamp explained that the intent of that portion of the
Subdivision ordinance was to suggest to subdividers that,
where possible, solar orientation be taken into account in
the design of projects.
The motion carried 5 : 2 with the following roll
call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Highland, Hanauer, Waage,
Lopez-Balbontin, and Chairperson Lochridge
NOES: Commissioners Luna and Brasher
dh-
C. INDIVIDUAL COMMENT
1. Planning Commission
Chairperson Lochridge repor d on the possibility of
cancelling the March 20, 1 0 meeting due to the Planning
Commissioners Institute ginning early morning on March
21st. It was the COmmi ioners' consensus to cancel the
March 20, 1990 meetin and adjourn to the meeting of April
3, 1990.
Commissioner Luna sked that staff obtain a City Attorney
opinion on the terpretation of Section 9-3 . 144
(Application f Performance Standards) in the Zoning
Ordinance.
Commission r Highland remarked there seems to be a new/used
"car lot" developing on the corner of Morro Road and
Atascad o Avenue. Mr. Decamp stated staff will look into
the m ter.
2. City Planner
Decamp reported on Amtrak train schedules to San Diego
for the conference if any Commission member is interested in
taking the train.
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item A-3
Through: Ray Windsor, City Manager Meeting Date: 3/13/90
From: Henry Engen , Community Development Director ,
SUBJECT:
Resolution No. 24-90 Expanding the List of Certified Arborists
Authorized to Prepare Tree Protection Plans .
RECOMMENDATION:
Acceptance of attached Resolution No. 24-90 .
BACKGROUND:
The City has received the attached letter from Arbor Tree Surgery
requesting that Michael Forister and Steven Alvarez be added to the
City ' s list of certified arborists .
ANALYSIS:
Ordinance No. 168 , „the Tree Ordinance" , provides teat. „tree pro-
tection plans shall be approved by an International Society of
Arboriculture ( _SA " certified arborist. . . . designated by resolution
of the City Council as acceptable to the City of Atascadero" . To
implement this provision of the ordinance , Resolution No. 33-88 was
adopted which listed all of the ISA certified arborists as of June ,
1987 .
The attached letter includes proof of ISA cert-f ication for Mesvers
Forister and A!,larez .
HE -- ph
Enclosures : Resolution No. 24-90
Arbor Tree Surgery Letter of Reauest
--c : Arbor Tree Surgery
RESOLUTION NO. 24-90
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ATASCADERO AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 33-88 TO
EXPAND THE LIST OF CERTIFIED ARBORISTS
AUTHORIZED TO PREPARE TREE PROTECTION PLANS
IN THE CITY OF ATASCADERO
WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Atascadero has adopted Reso-
lution No. 33-88 designating arborists certified to prepare tree
protection pians pursuant to Section 9-4. 155( b) ; and
WHEREAS, the International Society of Arboriculture ( ISA) has
certified additional individuals desirous of preparing tree pro-
tection plans within the City of Atascaderc; and
WHEREAS, amending said list is categorically exempt from the
provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act.
NOW, THEREFORE, The Council of the City of Atascadero does resolve
to add the following certified arborists to the list approved by
Resolution No. 33-88 :
Michael Forister - #394
Steven G. Alvarez - #51
On motion by and seconded by
the motion was approved by the following rol 'i
call vote
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
DATE ADOPTED:
By
ROLLIN DEXTER, Mayor
ATTEST:
LEE DAYKA, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
RAY WINDSOR, City Manager
Resolution No. 24-90
Page Two
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ARTHER MONTANDON, City Attorney
PREPARED BY:
�7
HENRY ENGEN
Community Development Director
RICHARD ALVAREZ, OWNER 802 PASO ROBLES STREET
TELEPHONE: (805) 239-1239 PASO ROBLES, CALIFORNIA 93446
- r _ i
9
FEB 2"), 193:1
NNE
February 22,1990
To: The City of Atascadero
From: Arbor Tree Surgery
Subject: Certified Arborists List
To whom it may concern:
We would appreciate if you would add the following employees
to the Certified Arborists List. Thank you for your time and
cooperation.
Michael Forister-Certification #394,received September 17,1988.
Steven G. Alvarez-Certification #511,received September 16,1989.
Sincerely,
Michael Forister
Steven . Alvarez
Arbor Tree Surgery
WESTERN CMAPTIER
soms
MICHAEL FQRISTER
Has been certified as an Arborist
by the western Chapter of the ..
tional Society of Arboriculture.
9/17/88 9117/91
Authmi,,d Signature Date c:FaWes
t
oa
n
b
(�
C*)
ars � � � •
C
doe AOL
r
�! CO
G
v
�' r.•"t7 CO
•
F f
FEE ZZ ' S^ 9 : 40 FROM PRBOR PPSO ROBLES TO PRBOR—ATPS PAGE . 001
d,
'rY'�P e`.
�� ^a +r r rr
A, ZlT
WA
..` 4,.ray ate:. V a aa•• -. �,
d w
V ' i.TF �e
SII , yY�� 1 �►��'� �'. M. §:
ti.
M
✓ � ��h raw r: � ;^�.
f, �t;;,,T �•• � h JAI ^`,� irre,•'
1 %
%r
F 1 -
r
CT,ty:,
fig.n` K�w• �r, �v urn'�"•, �'�' rA''' r _.5�'
4.1
ta
ti
;y Z � y tt •M�' 11 �vf �'y1„h`
.. r , � '��+r�YA+ r �r� pXy x ��a��i�t�:'.�, ac:i'6'r��� o> l'# � •.. •Y�' =,L'`\� >• .
4z �� fja •"{1';NrftY .s.
w a W'off
'
TOTAL PAt.F _ nn 1 :
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item: A-4 (A&B)
Through: Ray Windsor , City Manager Meeting Date: 3/13/90
From: Mark Joseph, Administrative Services Director
SUBJECT: Technical Adjustments to Resolutions 13-90 and 14-90/
Salary and Position Resolutions
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Council adopt the attached two
resolutions, making minor corrections to the Salary and Position
Resolutions.
BACKGROUND:
Council adopted resolutions 13-90 and 14-90 at its February
27, 1990 session. Subsequently, it was discovered that the
Deputy City Clerk salary range was inadvertently left out of the
salary schedule and the position of Plan Check Engineer was not
included in the Position Authorization Resolution. The purpose
of these two resolutions is to properly document staffing and
salary costs.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact , since both positions have
already been budgeted .
RESOLUTION NO. 28-90
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO
AMENDING RESOLUTION 13-90
ESTABLISHING SALARIES FOR CITY EMPLOYEES
BE IT RESOLVED, that
Section One: That the salary schedule for permanent authorized
positions shall be as set forth in Exhibit One, which is made a
part of this resolution; and
Section Two : That this resolution shall be effective January 1 ,
1990.
On motion by Councilperson and
seconded by Councilperson the foregoing
resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following
vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
DATE:
ATTEST:
LEE DAYKA, CITY CLERK ROLLIN DEXTER, MAYOR
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
ARTHER MONTANDON RAY WINDSOR
City Attorney City Manager
yr `. `I. 1b ins %W 11tt u/ b 7 rr lav 7 v✓ �v V vd rr V J ._/ ,�
A w O b b J T O W N b m V b P N 1 O b TJ 1 T I_Nt I>
0. 0 0- D LI 0 4CACIICR"0 � COCrl0 .PA FJrJI44MrM4IMMMrrHrrrrrrl0000000 1 CW
CG20 00 &100+a 0 00G1 �i'7( 00333333!333333333 33;3333333 t ZD
CC Wo NUSrnUSUi NU) U533 tTitTt333333133: 3333333 3S,� t:1iT C14'� '.1 I �1C�1
i
JsA A a b 0. 0> 00, 0, 0- W A 0•W0, -J -J 14AWNNWWWNIFJtJWNNNWNW W WN'rJFJrJNWt4 i oc-
qr J W M W W t• 0► - W w WC0Cr1C9 W•J10 _j Wr1%)!Lq OM., FjN 4f%) w ' LnwrrrrMrr 1 00
4+ r N r 4 r r r N N FJ N 0 r r r r M t+ v1 M 0 r M tt !FJ r' rJ -J 1i C0 CD M M M r.H H M H H H O ( 0 ti!
WO rr N►, OHOCRr OrOOr OOOOOtJt•JOOOO 0000 !" OOjNAWN � 00 i m
p -!!0 0wW "n"1 0T0U) cn00WITTT T 0 WW3> DD-V -n -00 TDTC3 I L Mto
i, -• io a n n�y £ £ tD a a a O c 0 '- -• -• -•to ID is c + -1 Ia M M 0 •- a c a w 0 w !I -•0 0 a a -• 1 0 Ti 1D
V 9 n A -q -1 n m 0 - a -s -1 n 1 m m � O n & 1 .+ -• -• + � Dl to .v 1 -9 8 1 .+ 1 w In.r
raC 0 TT 1J .� Z :«F � ID ID - tIbID - - I _ 3zKa - + p • - @ -•3 -. x I M2.
r M .r�.+ + Z a 0 0 1 3 w O p .Ic n 1n -A a a n bi + + -• n c 0 to
rD n -• 0 0006 ID 4a ID 0 -• 'n In O 11 • a G . 1 a rD 0 T - - - •+ . !n 0 ra 3 ► 3 1 F-+ -t -C
tt! to T v •i -Z ij : iD Z 3 -.Z .F J .t• I-+ ? r 0 J -•a -Ti 7 -• a t -{ M
(I •+ ID (D it - a a at a m lb .n !o O iB 0 +-T C3'- r M a a -.% O �+ T - £ -• 0•+ w :v z I r < N
-1 -• -S n 1 - . O J j z - -. 7 - r US -A + 0.'- -•I0 -n 3 S ID O i0 iD 7' A M a I tr1 m i7
TO M 4 a ,- a s J n In n J H Z -+ 0 -+ (D • - a IJ m r. iD Z £ 0 /T m '1 -fi - 1 n I 2
i 1 X •+ M •t •F tD tD ID IG `f .+ !D !D ? 0 1 T J J I C i ID £ -A T 3 17c !D C7 �. tD i H iTl
-•1 . 0 o (1 0 • -� 1 0 0 < r- U) Z Io .+ M < 1 _�, _ a n Itn -,ID - 06 1 \ ty
6 fl < z 1 0 £ £ r -! v - p -• V, F tD IIc R O - p a t1 � < n rC
I .- ID OzxN 0 tD 01n v1.41Mbzin N bntD3 N t7 • 18 N i \ r
4� n tD M H !-s 1 1 1 a n n n v -•a ip - M 3 O A a -. 0 ID -• -I+ 3 Z 0 tl j N 0 1 10 MU) !-+ *+ a tl 7 .+ rD + - o n 1 0 40 Z Z 1 1 a iD 0 - , C � 0 i O
G 0 -•N 'K£ • 0 n 3 K -• K ID a r 1 !fD
n -1 3 M 0 1 -• a 13 £ -•M 3 -' M •! y t7 @ ;n 1 -• d I
a H d 3 -+o, 0 IF n ID In 1 -. n ID 1 i
+ 0 -+ ID o
O ID +-• 1 1 (6 z 1 0 1 1 3 0 !1 * I
• V! • N 1 tl! O 1
+ (D
i
rJ NJ 1 t• A M M M � � !� t ! •!r.J �J M r r H M IJ O •J r r i!-• +* M r* M M r ! 0 �
• . . *0
. "o
: . 'o
'o
'o
1rjflLt 0 0 GOC 000co OOOCO OOCC c0007000Q0000 D 000000000 1 C^• Z
►• 4 H r M . t•J r M 4 4 M !.. r W !-•• t•J N I.j M r 1•0 PJ tJ t-J t•J rJ(W t•J iJ •J rJ N W tJ N Q N FJ I 1 7+
tJ0• 0 '
0, 0 0W -40. 0 -JO J 4 0M0W U
O -JC -JwO- -J i0w so10M -00• -0 .0 -b -il i D 3
w - ON M 0. 0 0 -J Ir -000 OO" W -JNO *00] 4H 00WAr0+ Awl 1 O
0. 0 �I b, .D -J A -0 w r•J FJ J 1J W O -0 0 C4 b W a-J 0 0 -0 W H -.! IT CD -J 00 .J 0• A M -J -0 j i CO Z
P' .i .t A w0 _j _j N0. ONw q tJ-Jd -0 A 0 -J -o0AW-0A -0A -0 .0Wrs •.i4A 0 00-I I M 2 0+
(10 M D, D-JW w 01 040 .009 W '.J EN W0, 0 C -b0. 0- CD NO. MWNODtq CD Wr .isCDVI10 b, 0! 1 T r �+
-c �4
N ►'• M H 4 :* N #A0 tJ N j Q N r•J N 0 w" W W W N W W W 0W W: t D IW
U -j0 0.0 M -0 m -ja W 0 n Cor sorW O03MOda -JdO'-o00 jf.k-J00A CRID I tr -i \
" o- O w 0 1a -J C4 W 0 G w .1 W -4 O ** -0 -p rJ 0 0 W w W O, Q 0 w -J I.0 0- CD 0, -J I I'•'1 0
.taterD 4- A t, W C4 0 00•{W 0t•J w
wI+C4Cn0 N •J -0 A V0 %0Ht.j W A 0 0, 0M0IQ CD '00• I W fA 1^
Wim !^ J. 0 • t-JIw CDN -0CDO W J -J0, NJ CL -4wA1-JM b0 W W -00CAiJI4 W 0 -0 CR i 11i 0
•J i
_10 w r M w -0 0- w;A o% A AWN IIw -i -0 -4 iit tr -0 A w w O(tJ O O W -0 W IW 0 -J -0 W CD
�rr 4 Hr tJtJ !-* Y_ - W M- I.j-JtJ JMHlJWtJtJiJwtJiJw J WNw W hJ JtJw i
�fOP M •JU4t•JOB oCO'0• -0u a 0- tJI0FJAq 10 .0N0C• MrM00QrJ4010FJN0• J0.O ! t7
ICO0w0 0. 03 jw1-4 b W .p .tw -J 0M0 - w M �.W OtJdI _! ^1M 1.1 -OO ArC j .4w t
Cf W A t0A-J +• W rANMCA -0M!r4ON -JOCR -JOOO- .SL, C4wjls (4 p-000• 00 O' 1 03
k* O W -J IJ 000 OOC4000 -0000 .04 W 46) �i003ACA i� ts *" gJs6 D .1 t, Q -b J•! ! IST
C a0 JrM CD 'o 040 CnC4 a0 !^ 0. O 0A W40•4004 Wt•J •DA, Wb -o N0 A4r i T
� s
- 4H M4I tJrJ 1 04I4t•JN J4N 400 JPJFJtJwPJWwwtJWW JwwWWtJ JWW t
•J OD I W4 0 .01.10w D 0-W w z 0owM -100rJ w UbOAW -iww i C
rr. AO- 040 -004 NW'VNM 4 .0l0ONC4 wwI-ba0bANw -1 -J " aF., -IW W .! i
Ib Ll OD �t00�pCrrO• (D0,, ODA OCR-OMw R0. -j JNrwO ►' IitT -03 M .0, w 0- •.t wl' � f UI
6 �ICr! 44!0 .0 W 1dtJ!" A A 0 p 'oW0-j 0 0` r'0. MOUSr•.) AJI4
0 .irNWMr WA I tri
0 - -j AN�' _j -J 0 a I w 0 w 4a _j OO .I tsIrJ00 " Nw010C, 0, 0 0ID -QA WWIf
-OI I T
� !
! 1•J !•^ J4r NQ Jt•JN1!- N0 •J !+•WW %) W WrJ'tJWNW WW J W WWW Ww W W W ..nJsAA A WV 1
Ci O CD -0 03 CIi FJ !-'' O C0 M W J C. i-J A0- r I+IA W CD H r W W 0 0 !- U N C4 C4 W 10 W'O -J -J CID W 0 P I M
t' : CII 0Q 40 N W�A tJ -0 -J 0 W M -0 W10, r• M -0 -4 .0 ••f .A D Lqw00l A -t n -j W,4 .0 .0ww003 I
W -JA -0wA -DO JJsC4w � * r -0;C4C* Co0. W
! AC4G .IW MC4A C4OVit, 0. CH -0 -iM0 1 N
n, CODO0• C40)0003C* ,0 -J -JL4W OOOONOrJO -J 00000000 IO 1 •-LTi
14 0 0 O A OW Q -J4�i 0 .r 0 w ,i C4 a vl 4 0 .0 000 CO CO0 0 I0 0 0 0 W O 03 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O!0 0 0 0 0 0�0 ! T
+ I
i I I
I
i
r/ 1► b W %w Vr V .0 r. %W .i W %W V r/ yr 4 d ..
.� cNn 1�• O C LL' J P U A 1+ �0 _y.�.u'.�1R+I
l0 10 m w -J C, I C
m to • 't�D 1 Z
W r ►+ l0 R I O
i i i ►�W FJ O 1 m
i I r
G F0 0 I O m
'Dv I m
O01 � -ml •
cn to i m
M m
n n •� m - I r �t
i ID N I
_7 Q 1 0
2 7 I
J 1
I
w I
I atr � tai i o `
urno D 00 0I L;
1 .
rr JPJPJ • I
tq ,r J a CA CAI D :r
OO NLR I O
I-v
i I aim Jo �°Io
i I ro
r. r JFJPJ . I D
0� .! til 0•'.D I +zF -i
I I 0,. ji h,
I
J J to & Q- W 10
�,.
r m W .I I V7
C4 -J J FJ �
PJ W 0. 1 T
I .
� F* �• -J PJ PJ I
I I
U AIA I C
A A JOm . I ?�
I I
i ( rFJ
-j 10 W 1
m � ao mIm
ti0 -iC~ bI m
j oo a0J
i
I
i
I
I I i
I
l
I I
I
I
RESOLUTION N0. 29-90
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO
AMENDING RESOLUTION 14-90
ESTABLISHING PERMANENT AUTHORIZED
POSITIONS IN THE CITY OF ATASCADERO
BE IT RESOLVED, that
Section One: That the number of permanent authorized positions by
Department and Classification shall be as set forth in Exhibit
One, which is made a part of this resolution and
Section Two : That this resolution shall be effective January 1 ,
1990.
On motion by Councilperson and seconded by
Councilperson the following resolution is hereby
adopted in its entirety on the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
DATE:
ATTEST:
LEE D K ,
AY .A CITY CLERK ROLLIN DEXTER, MAYOR
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
ARTHER MONTANDON RAY WINDSOR
City Attorney City Manager
a
CITY OF ATASCADERO
PERMANENT POSITIONS ALLOCATED
FOR FISCAL YEAR 1989-1990
Effective January 1 , 1990
CITY CLERK
Deputy City Clerk 0.5
Department Total 0.5
CITY MANAGER
City Manager 1 .0
Secretary to the City Manager 1 .0
Department Total 2.0
POLICE DEPARTMENT
Chief of Police 1 .0
Police Lieutenant 2.0
Police Sergeant 4 .0
Police Agent 5.0
Police Officer 16.0
Support Services Manager 1 .0
Support Services Lead Technician 1 .0
Support Services Technician 6.5
Department Total 36.5
FIRE DEPARTMENT
Fire Chief i .0
Battalion Chief 2 .0
Fire Captain- 4.0
Fire Engineer* 4 .0
Firefighter* 4 .0
Administrative Secretary 1 .0
Department Total 16.0
*Up to six positions may be designated Paramedics
PUBLIC WORKS
Director of Public Works/City Engineer 1 .0
Sensor Civil Engineer 1 .0
Engineering Technician II 1 .0
Engineering Technician 1 1 .0
Administrative Secretary 1 . 0
Superintendent of PL,Ulic Works 1 .0
Street Maintenance Supervisor 1 .0
Maintenance Leadwo-er 1 .0
Maintenance Worker iI 4 . 0
Building Maintenance Specialist i .() 0
Custodian 2.0
Chief of Wastewater Operations 1 .0
Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator iI 1 .0
Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator 1 1 .0
Wastewater Trtment Plant Operator-in-Training 1 .0
Department Total 19.0
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Director of Community Development
City Planner 1 .0
Senior Planner 1 .0
Assistant Planner 2.0
Building Official 1 .0
Plan Check Engineer 1 .0
Senior Building Inspector 1 • n
Building Inspector lI 2.0
Administrative Secretary 1 .6
Building Aide 1 .0
Office assistant iI 1 . 0
Department Total 13.6
PARKS, RECREATION AND ZOO
Director of Parka . Recreation Zoo 1 . :>
Assistant ParF:s, Recreation u Zoo Director 1 .0
Recreation Supervisor 2.0
Administrative Secretary 1 .0
Park Supervisor 1 •`-'
Maintenance Worker II 2.0
Maintenance Worker 1 1 .0
Department Total 1.0.0
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
Director of Administrative Services 1 •p
Assistant Finance Director 1 .`)
Administ�-ative Secretary 1 .0
Finance Technician 1 •�
Account Clerk II 1 =3
Account Clerk i 1 .5
Personnel Coordinator = • p
Department Total 7.5
TOTAL FULL-TIME PERMANENT POSITIONS 105. 1
p`.sta,ffBy . PG
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM: A-5
CITY OF ATASCADERO
THROUGH: Ray Windsor , City Manager MEETING DATE:
FROM: Andrew Takata, Director 3/13/90
Parks Recreation and Zoo Department
SUBJECT•
AWARD OF SEWER CLEANING JET TRUCK - BID NUMBER 90-1
RECOMMENDATION:
City Council award Bid Number 90-1 for a net amount of 68,906.00
for the purchase of one sewer cleaning jet truck to :
DewPar Equipment Company
23891 Via Fabricante
Mission Viejo , Ca. 92691
DISCUSSION:
This item was discussed and authorized as part of the 1989/90
budget update. DewPar Equipment Company was the lowest of two
bids received , as per attached memorandum from the City Clerk ' s
Office.
FISCAL IMPACT•
Funds sufficient to purchase the Sewer Cleaning Jet Truck has
been budgeted in the fiscal year 1989/90 budget .
AJT: kv
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Andy Takat
FROM: Don Leib
SUBJECT : Sewer Jet Truck - Bid No . 90-1
DATE: February 27, 1990
Bids were received February 16 , 1990 for a new sewer
cleaning jet truck for the Sanitation Division . Two bids
were received.
DewPar Equipment - New Truck w/cleaner 65 . 900
(Aquatech) Sales Tax 4 , 006
Net FOB Atascadero 69, 906
Less Trade-In _11000
Net FOB Atascadero $68, 906
Haacker Eauipment - New Truck 67, 850 .29
(Vactor) Sales Tax 4 ,240 . 64
Net FOB Atascadero 72 . 090 . 93
Less Trade-In =3 000_00
Net FOB Atascadero $69, 090 . 93
I would recommend we accept the low bid of DewPar
Equipment , with trade-in, of $68, 906 . 00.
Funds are in the Sanitation Capital Outlay account No .
790-0900-084-314 . Budget for this purchase is $70, 000.
Please refer to attached Bid Summary from City Clerk
BID SUMMARY
TO: Don Leib
Public Works
FROM: Lee Dayka
City Clerk
BID NO. 90-1
OPENED 2/16/90 10:00 A.M.
PROJECT: Sewer Cleaner
Supplier Description: Total Price: Delivery:
Haaker Equip . Co . GMC Vactor 850 $729090.93 180-150 days
3505 Pomona Blvd. ( 1500 gallon)
Pomona , CA 91768
With trade-in: 69,090.93
•Supplier : Description• Total Price: Delivery:
Dew-Par Equip . GMC C7HO42 $690906.00 120-180 days
23891 Via Fabricante (Aquatech ) (30% disc .
Mission Viejo , CA available)
92691
With trade-in ! 680906.00
•
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM: A-6
CITY OF ATASCADERO
THROUGH: Ray Windsor , City Manager MEETING DATE:
FROM: Andrew Takata, Director 3/13/90
Parks , Recreation and Zoo Department
SUBJECT:
AWARD OF DIAL A RIDE BUS BID - BID NUMBER 89-9
RECOMMENDATION:
City Council award Bid Number 89-9 for a net amount of $79,238.37
for the purchase of two Dial-A-Ride busses to :
United Bus Corporation (Champion)
6700 South Garfield Avenue
Bell Gardens, California
DISCUSSION:
This item was discussed and authorized as part of the 1989/90
budget update. United Bus Corporation was the lowest of three
bids received , as per attached memorandum
FISCAL IMPACT•
Funds sufficient to purchase the two Dial-A-Ride busses have been
budgeted in the fiscal year 1989/90 budget .
AJT: kv
M 9 M 0 N A N D U M
TO: Andv Takata
FROM: Don Leib /�
SUBJECT : DAR Bus Bids No . 89-9
DATE: February 27 . 1990
Bids were received January 15 , 1990 for two new buses to
be used for Dial-A-Ride . Bids received were :
United Bus Corp (Champion)
%Paul Nyman
6700 S . Garfield Ave
Bell Gardens , CA
2 Buses @ $34 . 691 $68 , 382 . 00
Sales Tax 4 , 336 . 37
2 Lift Inst . @ 4010 _ 8 . 020 . 00
TOTAL $81 .738 . 37
Less Trade-In on 2 Buses 2,500 00
NET FOB ATASCADERO $79,238.37
Alpha Bus Corp (Champion)
%Stephen French, V .P.
1821 W. 213th Unit C
Torrance , CA
2 Buses @ $35 ,710 $71 .420 . 00
Sales Tax 4 ,463 .75
2 Lift Inst . @ 3035 _ 6 . 070 . 00
NET FOB ATASCADERO $81 ,953.75
No Trade-In Quoted
Wide-One Corporation
%Frank Morgan , V .P.
3051 E. La Palma Avenue
Anaheim, CA
2 Buses @ $33 ,532 $67 . 064 . 00
Sales Tax 4 . 191 .50
2 Lift Inst . @ 8908 _17 . 816 . 00
TOTAL $89, 071 .50
Less Trade-In , 2 Buses __4000_00
NET FOB ATASCADERO $85 ,071 .50
• The
City has received Section 18 Grants for both of
these buses which will cover 80% of the purchase price . The
City must , however, front the entire cost and apply for the
grant monies . Funds for this purchase are in Acct . # 250-765-
50-404 .
Due to the low trade-in offered by the low bidder , I
would suggest we accept the low bid and retain the trade-ins
to be surplused and disposed of at a later date.
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item: A - 7
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Through: Ray Windsor, City Manager Meeting Date: 3-13-90
From: Richard H. McHale, Chief of Police 01'/
-----------------------------------------------------------------
SUBJECT: Purchase of new furniture for police facility.
RECOMMENDATION: By motion, authorize staff to purchase new
office furniture for the new P.D. from Prison Industries, State
of California, for a total amount not to exceed $23,000.
DISCUSSION: Council may recall authorizing an expenditure of
$20,000. 00 in the current budget for acquisition of office
furniture for the new P.D. In keeping with this, I am proposing
that our City purchase the furniture from the California Prison
Industry Authority.
The furnishings I have requested will include 127 pieces of
furniture with 11 desks and chairs, 14 tables, 2 bookcases, 1
credenza plus stacking chairs, side chairs and lobby chairs.
It is our plan to move about 25% of our existing police dept.
furniture to the new facility for continuing use there. (Much of
the furniture we now have was purchased used in 1980 while the
new furniture bought at that time was of substandard quality. )
The furnishings I am proposing are built by prisoners who are
supervised by State employees in prison factories. I have
visited the facilities and am convinced that this furniture is of
superior quality to that offered by private industry and at a
cost significantly lower than the public market. Additionally, I
have personally used the Prison Industries furniture in other
police agencies where I've worked and have found it to be much
more rugged (due to specific State specifications) than open
market furnishings.
This item was discussed during our last City staff meeting, and
there was concurrence from the group including City Attorney Art
Montandon and City Manager Ray Windsor that this is a sound
approach for this purchase.
FISCAL IMPACT: As indicated, Council previously authorized
(fiscal year 1989-90) an expenditure of $20, 000 for furnishing
MEETING AUENDA
DATE1 f� ITEM
1850
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER • SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA 93408 • 805-549-5450
February 15, 1990
Honorable Rollin Dexter DAVID BLAKELY
Mayor, City of Atascadero DISTRICT FIVE
6500 Palma Avenue
Atascadero, CA 93422
Dear Mayor Dexter,
The Census Bureau will be conducting its 1990 decennial
Census from March 26th to April 1st. It is very
important that everyone participates. Therefore,
involvement at the local level is crucial.
Results of the Census will provide information that
directly affects cities and municipalities in many areas.
The census information will help to develop social
service programs, including programs for the elderly and
handicapped; assess transportation systems and improve
commuting patterns; identify areas for low-.cost housing
programs; and plan school district boundaries and school
construction programs, as well as others.
As chairman of the Complete Count Committee I would
appreciate your assistance in the following areas.
First, in adopting a resolution that promotes Census
Week. Then bring the resolution to the press conference
that will be held on Tuesday, March 27th, at 1:00p.m. on
the Monterey Street steps of the County Court House. A
sample of a resolution has been enclosed for your
convenience.
Each of the above mentioned will help to publicize the
Census. I appreciate your cooperation, and look forward
to having you at the press conference. Please contact my
office if you can make it, if you can't, please send a
councilmember or other representative.
Sincerely,
DAVID BLAKELY
Supervisor District 5
Enclosure
RESOLUTION NO. 30-90
RESOLUTION OF THE ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL
PROCLAIMING MARCH 23-31, 1990 AS "CENSUS WEEK"
The following resolution is hereby offered and read:
WHEREAS, the United States Constitution mandates a census
every 10 years to apportion representatives among the states; and
WHEREAS, on April 1, 1990, the Census Bureau will conduct
the 21st Decennial census of the United States. The Census
Bureau took the first census 200 years ago and has conducted a
national census every 10 years since then; and
WHEREAS, the census will help develop social service pro-
grams, identify areas for low-cost housing programs, assess
transportation systems and improve commuting patterns, to name a
few; and
WHEREAS, the United States Supreme Court has ruled that
individual answers are absolutely confidential. The 1990 census
records will be held confidential for 72 years--until the year
2062 .
WHEREAS, the mandated completion is to deliver apportionment
counts to the President by December 31 , 1990; provide data
necessary for redistricting to states no later than April 1,
1991 .
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Atascadero City
Council that the week of March 23 through March 31, 1990 is
hereby proclaimed as "Census Week", and all residents are urged
to stand up and be counted.
On motion by Councilmember seconded by Coun-
cilmember the foregoing resolution is hereby
adopted on the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ADOPTED:
ATTEST:
LEE DAYKA, City Clerk ROLLIN W. DEXTER, Mayor
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM: C-1
CITY OF ATASCADERO
THROUGH: Ray Windsor, City Manager MEETING DATE: 3/13/90
FROM: Andrew Takata, Director
Parks. Recreation and Zoo Department
SUBJECT:
SKATEBOARDING - PROPOSED REGULATING ORDINANCE
RECOMMENDATION:
Direct staff to create a skateboard regulating ordinance that
would eliminate skateboarding within the Business Improvement
Area boundaries, except between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 8:30
am and 3:00 p .m. to 4:00 p .m. , Monday through Friday; and no
skateboarding allowed on Saturday and Sunday .
BACKGROUND:
As per the City Council ' s request , staff has worked with the
Skateboard Association and performed several informal surveys of
the business community to determine if a skateboard ordinance is
necessary.
DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS:
In order to more effectively determine the need for a skateboard
ordinance, the staff initiated two surveys and worked with the
Skateboard Association to help alleviate the concerns of the
business community. While working with the Skateboard
Association ( reference in Exhibit A) , the skateboarder ' s devised
a rule of etiquette for use of skateboards . Durino this time,
staff informally surveyed the businesses within the Business
Improvement Area before and after efforts were made with the
Skateboard Association to mitigate concerns, with the following
results :
FIRST SECOND
SURVEY SURVEY QUESTION RESULTS
59% 57% Observed damage to property by skateboards
67% 63% In favor of an ordinance restricting skate-
board use
35% 47% In favor of restricting skateboarding in all
public areas
42Y. 30% In favor of restricting skateboarding in all
commercial areas
23% 23% In favor of restricting skateboarding only in
the Business Improvement Area boundaries
65% 47% Business ` receiving comments on concerns of
s :ateboardino activities from their customers
Since there has not been any substantial improvement ; staff is
recommending the creation of a requlating skateboard ordinance.
AJT; kv
skate2
Exhibit "A"
Skateboard Survey Results
The skateboard survey was oesigned to get information and comments from
business owners concerning skateboarders conduct in agreement with the Mudhole
Skateboard Association's progress of the "Rules of Skateboard Etiquette". A. totai
of 125 surveys were passed out in the Business Improvement Area and various
downtown shopping centers. 55 (44 0) were returned. The City of Atascadero
Parks, Recreation and Zoo Department hand delivered these surveys to the areas
mentioned above. The area was determined by using a City Planning "lap of the
Business Improvement Area.
The Survey consisted of a background, a list. of the "Skateboarders' Rules of
Etiquette, S close-ended and 3 open-ended c;uestlons, in addition, 4 questions
allowed for any comments and descriptio is s
A meeting to discuss these matters w i 1 il be i field between the Recr�'?t i�•ri
Staff and the Mudhole Associat�4n rn Tuesday, A!ro 2 at l:��lpm at the Reti.re•ation
off ice.
Results by Cuesrion
1 . 53 (96%) are aware of skateboarding in the do,,. rito;vn area c^d 2(4%) are not.
2. 38 (69%) are aware of the discUsSlOnS between the City Council and t
Skateboard Association, and 17 (31 1%) are not.
7. Of those surveyed, 22 (40%) n,ot.iced areae Of t"ieir property tI"rat r eco five
skateboard use free of debris. 33 (60?) did not.
4. 19 (35%) of the businesses surveyed responded that ; ustorners have not
commented on skateboarders outside of their ect,blisi)mer�t. Of the 36 (65%)
that answered s ler ` tr, igiY
e l e a� � SG:;'1e of . e cGr i �i .riL
a. "! am fearful 4f i;:in^ run over and^'t While wa'i ,ig nin Or ,r
y �t„ t tv ly r cilif„�:iJ: )•-•>.,+ C=iU� {.•tiii•te;tt
b. 'Those skateboarders are t
foolish, re-,Oess, and ir�consiceraie '
"The i he nnisa of trio°y'tenoaf`'" is cisruptive a, n i have ei^'; _. Iii :":em `lti e �tai'KMiQ Gr ::'',Klin 11',!
of your [)arkinc spaces „
r+ "Q+8t°hvur>r :rs;r° nit -zreE l or courteous."
V• - * u i .•. for- t
e, ,The, frighten me c'y the?r onaoe. !t not Sate lher� nr Me
r
f "it i5 �4��a 1. '{.`f fnA1� t^. � n {{..e• ,..},7i of i'nt .0' T��,y t^I'1r-T 7 n i ',I"!" 7 r.
tF.-atop)-. . ')al 0n tIf•,. .IC „, hs V: .i .Ci i-I� " u.: ' . i•U... Lt",yf.jne
Or any Coo"' trot nlI.gjlt �, Iro Cnon
Y �),;,
y "i cull not :e:teve the way skateboarders Vo not 'lock Out to car;.cne
h. "They are,very nosti ie anc rude to elder peso ie
5. Responses to ct;servIn-1 damage to your property from skateboarders 'has 29
(53%) yes and 26 (47%) no. Of those that said yes, 29 ( 100%) said it was
reported to them. Com-: ents to this question were:
a. 1 have seen them trying to jump and do other tricks from planters etc... with
predictable results- damage
b. Skateboardino marks on my walls, and jumping across my plants.
C. Ceramic ti les on sides of the building were broken off and knocked loose.
d. Skateboarders used a plastic sign stored in bark of the center as a ramp to ride on. They broke the
plastic and le`t the pieces scattered all over the parking lot when cone.
e. Skateboarders were using a wooden bench outside the business as a platform for some rind of stunt.
As a result, paint was scrapped off the bench. i had to personally chase them away.
f. Skateboarders ride on the outside of my office. They have knocked things of my shelves and desk
inside the office from it as well l even had a glass painting tall down and brake to pieces from it.
6. 37 (67%) answered Yes they felt that an ordinance restricting the use of
skateboards in the downtown area needs to be adopted. 13 (24%) did not. 5 (97,0)
did not comment. The type of restrictions they feel should be enforced are-
a. Keep cuff sidewalks - away from open businesses.
b. Considering skateboarders have no respect for other people and their property, they should e-
banneo from an community. They should be banned - period.
c. The skated need eed a place to ride. Pre-teen and Teens have nothing in Atasaadero, C-al i f Or,nia.
d. A speed nim it, no conaregaiing and going back and forth in same area, ride away from t;u;;rways.
e. They Bre a da:g?r forl ,,-lder people who come i. OI eStabliShment. Pian them frorr! Ql;r ;;';dam'.
f. Aii private property Should be off limits because of the potential and real dangers.
g. Do not damage property and building,stay away from "quite businesses"sucn as doctor offices.
h. Pedestrian safEty. nestr ict skateboarding to port ions of the sidewalk along SirE2t, away f roil ,tore
doorways.
1. Downtown is not a place for youth recreation unless it is inside a controlled envir oniment tike a
skateboard park.
7.
If an ordinance was to be inaeted Chase are the f ll "irn a ey would; l i e
01, ty rep. th 1tiCu!G I k,
to S It ln:
A. in ail r'uoiic areas 19 l3 5-;i"' �. In only tine area 13 �o)
in a, i T�
u. i i commercial acnes 23 \ ^civ, L. 'tithe'
t. !o think that cni idren 'Iii e till.' r ll^' G On StupiJl '
a ,trig !o e til .�i elves" is so naive as.to bo der
requests i(l the past for the c`i+e.n, t^ ai cnIa r l +ho,r bel-.a i c mo' Y
q p :� E any .! "G .; it .. �. •,,V or hc.J ,I .on rUGeneSS crld nc!n-
compliance. To think that tn-so sa,me c n i irre.r, are r,C;w doing to ce so responsible is luaierous. 1,
commercial area is;ust l^ ., f�rour�� �'u'J ro Wrl' e e;
I t ij &v
T• -' ni-�ed to si�ay -.4s S�cewadks'durit-to t;uslness 'fin heavy trAffic ngt.,r�� nzec:
a p ate t o r i;:�e, fu r n i S e0 0•y i,,Ouri ty or, pr ivaTe en!er Dr i se. By cloil ng th i s you car el i i nate the
to Ms. T h 1 S town as, peciple,ni n T CI ilff-ryc-,-ur;,,
1 J •
F,a form of!n a n o o r+—t 4 n fz--1 a Skateboarder has ariIdht, the same as a Ceotrian. Tf)gje- from
here to there, What I find irritalino is when they ao back and forth in the same area necause the
r_-
rovicl,Rs an interestlnc do like,to congregate, so I believe if there were,czslgi'atethat
the ;Kateboarders would co tMere. -,:or tMe sake of competition and "showing off skills."
b.
In my omnion City money should founc and Recreation-i n s I nould have the same priority as funds for
.1 1 Re. zatic
Fire and Police. What is more imnrtant ",an our young people? Consider itaninvestment.
G. 1 do not want the kids banned from skateboard riding. However, they should not damage prooerty or
create excessive noise durino business hours. We have noticed an improved behavior of skateboards and
and we wfll support them in anyway possible.
should� -erne,� their children are doing,and if they can't be, stiff fines
I Parents shc ,e more cont., with what th
might open their eyes.
8. Skateboarding is not a crime!! HOWEVER,destruction of public and private property is. Some of
-:.EASE also have no retard for -y,<� shopping centers. Pi EASE give 'hem a �Iac to ride. Lets do
V. cars- , - Ce I_
something nice for our I<lcs and Granoirjos and give them a chance- Don't keep telling them NO.
9. Skateboards themselves are not at fault. I skateboarded when I was younger without harassing other
people and casing n .1
r,^,,.)c-r,,v -arnam , 71"iese kids are running together like a pack or gang, he,skateboard running I kehnard "s
• just a flag'or, tl(ern le,carry, 1 ike a Harley Davidson to a He)is Angel.
10. An aclu i'kion, to 5k a,' n
eprrers' Etiquette should be- For the safety of pedestrians and cars from out of
control sv a*keoCarcs it are dannr-uo;-Rrid re^K less.
We S
01 -d n;;r[�inq lot3 of downtown. Parks, hav,:, �aari built for
-: -w -,5-r son ,, I I _ 0'.
We don ,-1,lo I v ne Fop }n _. :11,
baseball. 13u�,-a'a soL'k`e-0-,-^.,ar6 facility for theseyoung people.
ateboarcs nL- --
Z;�,i
c on private property which tj?%,ey have been given permission to!Jse-only. T hey are
J
not yel-licle- wn-l-, f�- !,,censeul'•:,-.,r use on roads. 71 hey are not biDycies wrilch are licensed,ano, ninust obey
a','I rules aS,CIO,I I rieo D�11 Y ateomr-as are a riaZa.—U and distraction to motorists.
13. It is a plain "a-C4 t,�,iat sk ate0carcers can not be.,,On si aerate of other people and property.
n RI
s In he Same category as Golf, T P-rinlis, and Co Carts. The city wou i0i not ai low golfers
to ri 1 t tat' in e 5- r..K a r (jar: r,S, l
cillayers to hit haat is &-lairst the City Hall wal'Is, or go carts to
drlyecliwn The mentioned recreations all have rights. Tie rignt to co to the
golf C o uQNi—car* 'ravk and'thereby no' 4nfringe on the legal r igl-itc of others by causing
harmful, 1-oaZarCOUSSituation; ,n public areas speCi fica I ly maCe for waiking.
LrCt1I,ally mace people who walk or are in wheel M3',rs. '�falkers rights should
U
ID Yer,�
c,o m e. f first.
l�. till ,.ve,, wro*,z *,..nese r•,'—) forcv, the most c4or trat ska*e�oarce',--s are teenao;ers,and
below ii ale. A--, a result a too Immature to^torte the juZum en t5l ceci-lonc cc,I I e,, fur in this
wall, it shGUI6 be common
ic, o n :�orneo,ie e,
An aGUlt WOUI:- me enOUGn to know 'they couldr,`, C!
sense to sla,/out of `;Zrcries :,,r babies. Wriat ey !o, i -7 vear .01,0 is cuing to keep (rorn skating of and
tel I someone of r,3 sm a l�e don=.^ I I wi I I never happen.
•
Have You ever 'c: t-
tnel' harr�s ano I nee;: t—, An! ..n.marts an.IsIratche,c;.,:,k of
s',dewalks before 11,1ey leave'-,,P,5,50RD. Ilever in my lifetime will 1 ever observe a skateboarder pick ng up
their board when ciose to j.peces-tri.ars.
8. These skateboarders are still M the growing up stage of life. They don't have the self discipline which
. k - k I I
is necessary to make miaturel udgmental decisions. any of a city ordinance on skateboarding
should require the parent or guardian to pay a minimum $25."Ju fine.
MEET[ o AGENDA
DA J ` ' ITEM i
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: May 16, 1989
TO: Ray Windsor
City Manager
FROM: Andrew J. Takata, Director r
Department of Parks, Recrea' iori" and Zoo
SUBJECT: PROPOSED SKATEBOARD ORDINANCE
BACKGROUND:
At its meeting of March 28, 1989, the City Council requested the
Parks and Recreation Commission to examine the possibility of an
ordinance regulating the use of skateboards in Atascadero .
On April 20, 1989, the Parks and Recreation Commission endorsed
the concept of a skateboard ordinance, but did not make any
recommendation as to what restrictions should be incorporated or
• specific areas to be affected.
DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS:
Staff has attached a proposed ordinance which the City Council
may wish to utilize in the preparation of an ordinance.
The proposed ordinance would restrict the riding and parking of
skate- boards within the boundaries of the Business Improvement
Association area of the downtown section of the city. In
addition, it would also prohibit the use of skateboards on
private parking lots within the city limits of Atascadero that
are posted by the owner .
The reason for the proposed ordinance is due to the increasing
number of complaints that have been received from the community
concerning skateboards.
RECOMMENDATION:
Therefore, it is recommended that the City Council utilize the
attached proposed ordinance as a working document to implement an
ordinance to regulate the use of skateboards within the
• boundaries of the Business Improvement Area of the downtown
section of the City of Atascadero and posted private parking
lots within the city limits of Atascadero .
AJT:kv
File: skate3
PROPOSED ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE NUMBER
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO
ADDING ARTICLE 16 TO CHAPTER 2 OF TITLE 4
OF THE ATASCADERO MUNICIPAL CODE
ENTITLED
REGULATIONS FOR SKATEBOARDS
The Council of the City of Atascadero ordains as follows:
Section 1 . Article 16 is added to Chapter 2 of Title 4 of
the Atascadero Municipal Code to read as follows:
ARTICLE 16. REGULATIONS FOR SKATEBOARDS
Section 4-2. 1601 . Effect of Regulations
(a) The parent of any child or guardian of any
ward shall not authorize or knowingly permit
any such child or ward to violate any of the
provisions of this article.
Section 4-2. 1602. Riding Restrictions
(a) No person shall use, ride, or operate any
skateboard upon any sidewalk , public street ,
or publicly owned parking lot , or in
violation of any of the provisions of the
Vehicle Code. The provisions of Section
4-2. 1602a shall apply to the Downtown
Parking and Business Improvement area only,
as specified in Title 3, Chapter 11 ,
Section 3-11 .02 of this Code.
(b ) No person shall use, ride or operate any
skateboard upon any private parking lot
within the city limits of Atascadero, when
such private parking lot is posted by the
owner . Posting shall consist of a sign not
less than 17 by 22 inches in size, with
lettering not less than one inch in height ,
prohibiting skateboard riding on the property
displayed at all entrances to the property.
Section 4-2. 1603 Parking Restrictions
No person shall park or leave any skateboard upon
any street or sidewalk in such a manner as to
obstruct or hinder the free passage of pedestrians
or other vehicles permitted to use the same.
Ordinance Number Page 2
Section 2 . Publication. The City Clerk shall cause this
ordinance to be published once within fifteen (15) days after its
passage in the Atascadero News, a newspaper of general circulation,
printed, published and circulated in this City in accordance with
Government Code Section 36933 ; shall certify the adoption of this
ordinance; and shall cause this ordinance and certification to be
entered in the Book of Ordinances of this City.
Section 3 . Effective Date. This ordinance shall go into
effect and be in full force and effect at 12: 01 a.m. on the thirty-
first (31st) day after its passage.
On motion by Council member and
seconded by Council member the
foregoing ordinance is hereby adopted in its entirety by the
following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
• DATE ADOPTED:
CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA
By
BONITA BORGESON, Mayor
City of Atascadero
ATTEST:
BOYD C. SHARITZ, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORT.:
JEFFREY G. JORGENSEN, City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
RAY WENDSOR,-City T lanager
DRAFT MINUTES (These minutez have not yet been Jonmaeey approved by the
Pahk,d and RecAeat.ion Comm.i.4z i.on)
PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES - APRIL 20,1989
ITEM 5-9 - SUMMER SWIM PROGRAM PROPOSAL:
Staff states that the Parks, Recreation and Zoo Department has
been approached by the Atascadero School District with a proposal
to administer their summer, 1989 swim program at Atascadero High
School and Creston Elementary School . It is clarified that no
formal discussions have transpired as yet. .
After reviewing alternatives, staff feels that the Parks,
Recreation and Zoo Department would be interested in pursuing
this proposal . However, due to the late date, it is felt that
formal discussions are needed to provide a quality program,
preferably in the summer of 1990.
MOTION: Commissioner Bench moves to recommend to the
City Council that staff negotiate with the
Atascadero Unified School District to
administer the operation of the District 's
pool program for the summer of 1990;
Commissioner Smart seconds; motion
carries 5-0
***s** RES
ITEM 5-C - PROPOSAL TO TRICT SKATEBOARD USE WITHIN ATASCADERO:
***a** a
The City Council has requested the Parks and Recreation
Commission review the need for an ordinance to restrict
skateboard use in certain areas of Atascadero.
Chairman Harris voices his concerns to ban a means of
transportation (since bicycles are allowed) without effort's to
accommodate skateboarders.
The Commission reviews possible areas to curtail use of
skateboards. It agreed that there is a need to educate students
on skateboard safety (as provided for bicycle safety) , and feel
this can be done jointly between the Atascadero School District
and Police Department.
MOTION: Commissioner Smart moves to acknowledge to the
City Council that the Parks and Recreation
Commission agrees that there is a safety concern
regarding skateboards, and recommend the City
Council begin the process for adoption of an
ordinance restricting use of skateboards in
certain areas of Atascadero and encourage an
education process on skateboard safety Jointly
School District and Police Department; seconded
by Commissioner Bench; Motion carries 5/0
i�Vtl
tV
Xl*
..........
...........
CX
iV.
---jr
............
..W-1
4XV.k 6SA
.4
uj ......
ui
...... Ic
.. .........
V)
LLJ ............
.................
Ot
X.
pis
-I v
v od
LL
to IL
LL)
4c
.............al-
.7
0.
9L
.40
.. .......
ATASCADERO BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION
BOUNDARIES
From the South corner of Morro Road at the Highway 101
over-crossing then in the generally northwest direction
immediately adjacent to Highway 101 , to a point , at the
intersection of El Camino Real and Rosario Ave. , then
easterly along Rosario Ave. , to a point at the intersection
O'E' Rosario and Palma Ave. , then easterly along Palma Ave.
to the rear lot line of parcels on the west side of Traffic
Way, then north along said rear lot lines to the rear lot
lire of parcels on the south side of Olmeda Ave. , then
easterly to the rear lot line of parcels on the west side
of Traffic Way, then north along said rear lot lines to
include Lot 24 of Block Ilk, of Atascadero , then northerly
along the center line of Traffic flay, to a point , then
easterly to include the presently existing National Guard
Armory Property, then to a point easterly to the intersection
of West :"Tall and Santa Ysabel Ave. at the West Mall bridge ,
then southerly along Santa Ysabel Ave. to a point at the
intersection of the southerly leg of Hospital Drive and
Santa Ysabel Ave. , then easterly from that point to the ex-
tension of proposed :?ighway 41 , then southwesterly to the
Morro Road/Highway 101 over-crossing, point of beginning..
The area shall include all businesses located on parcels contiguous too
the Traffic "clay boundary.
11*
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: City Manager Ray Windsor and City Council Members
FROM: Chief of Police
SUBJECT: Skateboarders
DATE: March 23, 1989
As the issue of skateboarders was raised during our last Council Meeting of
3-14-89, our P.D. supervisors and I discussed this matter in an effort to
surface a few alternative approaches which might be practical.
Attached for your information and consideration is a memo which Sgt. Jeff
Fredericks submitted relating to skateboarding. Note that during the past
eleven weeks, 63 calls for service have been received regarding skateboarding
problems.
Sgt. Fredericks listed seven alternatives which staff and City Council Members
may wish to consider. One additional area of concern we should address is the
issue of potential liability, both for our City and for private property
owners, merchants and others.
This information is intended to provide a platform for additional discussion
within the staff and Council forums.
RICHARD H. McHALE
RHM:sb
Attach:
�r
i �c-
�' O` 7
March 20, 1989
To : Chief McHale via the Chain of Command
From: Sgt . Fredericks
Re : Options to the skateboard problem
Over the past few months the city has been plagued with an
increase in the number of complaints from citizens and
businesses, over skateboarders . The problems reported range
from simple trespasses to vandalisms and interference with
businesses .
When asked to suggest options for consideration, I reviewed
our calls received since the first of the year regarding
this problem. Here are my findings; In January APD received
18 calls regarding skateboarders causing disturbances . In
February we received 22 calls, and between March 1st and
18th we received 23 calls . This does not include the
numerous letters and phone calls from business owners
requesting extra patrol and advise . Nor does it include the
officer initiated contacts with skateboarders stemming from
these requests . It is clear that as the weather warms, the
number of complaints will rise .
I have discussed this with officers and supervisors . From .
these discussions the following options were derived.
1 . Prohibit use on public sidewalks .
2 . Prohibit use on public sidewalks in business
districts, as defined by the CVC .
3 . Prohibit use on public sidewalks in specified areas
of the city .
V/4 . Prohibit skateboarders from using public sidewalks and
streets; in business districts; in specified areas .
t--'5 . Prohibit skateboarders from using posted private
property .
``'6 . Provide an education program by the SRO regarding the
proper etiquette of using skateboards on public
thoroughfares .
� 7 . Prohibit use on school property, and specified public
properties .
•
Page - 1
A review of this list shows several options . While the
options are similar, each has its own advantages and
disadvantages . Option 1 , is all sweeping, in that it
prohibits skateboarding in more areas than are having
problems . It will also have a tendency to push the kids into
the streets which could cause an increase in the accident
rate . Option 2 , would generally have the same problems as
option 1 . Option 3. would allow area targeting, but again
would push kids into the street . Option 4, would generally
follow suit with options 1 - 3, with the advantage of
keeping the skateboarders out of the street . Option 5 ,
would require property owners to post their property. This
would require that a posting standard be established .
Option 6 , has been tried during the bicycle safety
presentations made to all the schools . It seems to be
effective for one or two weeks, then the problems return .
Option 7, would require the cooperation of city and school
officials to establish posting and enforcement requirements .
From my sampling of the disturbance calls, it seems that
the majority of the calls are concentrated in the downtown
area . The second problem areas are the schools .
Short of banning skateboards within the city limits, I would
recommend that a blending of the listed options be adopted .
I feel we could curtail the largest number of complaints by
prohibiting the use of skateboards on public sidewalks and
streets along E1 Camino Real , Entrada, Lewis Ave . , Palma,
East Mall , and West Mall between Rosario and Curbaril . In
addition skateboard use should be prohibited on posted
private property, schools , and specified public properties,
ie . City Hall and AFD Station #1 . This solution, while not
a panacea appears to be the most livable . It allows
businesses to keep their areas open to their customers . It
keeps the skateboarders from the busiest area of the city,
while at the same time allowing the kids to enjoy their
sport .
Page - 2
MEMORANDUM
TO: RAY WINDSOR, City Manager
FROM: ANDY TAKATA, Director of Parks, Recreation
and Zoo
SUBJECT: ATASCADERO SKATEBOARD ASSOCIATION
DATED: JUNE 23, 1989
As per the City Council 's direction, the Skateboard Sub-
Committee has worked with the skateboarders with regard to
the Skateboard Ordinance in the downtown area. The Sub-
Committee has met with the Mudhole Skateboard Association
which came up with the attached "Rules of Skateboard
Etiquette . "
These rules , that were developed by the Association, were
from many meetings held by 40-50 skateboarders . The goal of
the Association is to police themselves for the enforcement
of the rules and to create fund raising for the repair of
properties that have been damaged by the skateboarders and/or
the development of a skateboard park.
Caleb Plowman is the President of the Association and Art
Lindsey, the Vice President . Karen Rigss and Kathy Clark are
two parents who have been working with the Association
At the City Council meeting of April 11 , 1989, the City
Council requested status reports with regard to the
Skateboard Association' s progress . In order to get an
overall picture of the Skateboarders ' Rules of Etiquette,
staff will institute a survey in July of the business owners
in the downtown area. This survey will be done every two
months for the next year to determine the progress of the
Skateboarders ' Rules of Etiquette and to help determine if
the City Council should consider an ordinance .
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call .
SKATEBOARDERS ' RULES OF ETIQUETTE
To avoid vandalism:
1 . No wall riding except of walls approved by property
owners .
2 . No skating on planters, benches or tables that may
be damaged.
3 . Stay out of landscaping.
4. Notify owner of property, if damage occurs .
5. Leave skating areas as clean or cleaner than when
you started.
For safety of pedestrians :
1 . Give pedestrians the right of way.
2 . Avoid busy sidewalks .
3 . Don' t skate in front of doorways .
• 4 . Pick up your skateboard when close to pedestrians .
5 . Be polite .
For safety of skaters and cars :
1 . Don ' t ride in the street unless it is safe and there
is no sidewalks .
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: July 26, 1989
TO: Ray Windsor
City Manager
FROM: Andrew J. Takata, Director
Parks, Recreation and Zoo Department
SUBJECT: SKATEBOARD UPDATE
In order to determine the need for a skateboard ordinance, staff
is conducting a survey along EI Camino Real , Traffic Way,
Entrada, Williams Shopping Center , Adobe Shopping Center , and
Laucky ' s Shopping Center .
Attached , you will find a copy of the survey being used. We will
compile the results and forward them to you. Once the first
survey is taken, staff will meet with the Skateboard Association
to inform them of the survey results.
In September , another survey will be taken to see if there has
been improvement with the relationship between the businesses and
the skateboarders.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call .
-------------------- ------------ ----
Andrew Takata
AJT: kv
;skateb
•
CITY OF ATASCADERO
SKATEBOARD ETIQUETTE SURVEY
Background
At the City Council meeting of April 11 , 1989,the City Counsel requested status reports with regard to the
Mudhole Skateboard Association's progress of the "Rules of Skateboard Etiquette." These rules were
developed by the Association which is made up of 40-50 skateboarders. The goal of the Association is to
police themselves, enforce the rules of skateboard etiquette and to create fund raising for the repair of
properties that have been damaged by the skateboarders and/or the development of a skateboard park.
In order to get an overall picture of the "Rules of Skateboard Etiquette", the City of Atasc adero will
institute this survey now, with another to follow later, to determine the progress of the skateboarders'
"Rules of Skateboard Etiquette" and to help determine if the City Council should consider an ordinance.
Included below is a copy of the "Rules of Skateboard Etiquette."
Please take the time to complete this questionnaire and mail it in the return envelope provided. The space
provided for your name, address and phone number is optional. It is for our purposes should we need to
contact you for further information.
Any further questions call the City of Atascadero Parks, Recreation and Zoo Department,
461- 5000. Thank You.
SKATEBOARDERS' RULES OF ETIQUETTE
TO AVOID VANDALISM:
I. NO WALL RIDING EXCEPT OF WALLS APPROVED BY PROPERTY OWNERS.
2. NO SKATING ON PLANTERS, BENCHES OR TABLES THAT MAY BE DAMAGED.
3. STAY OUT OF LANDSCAPING.
4. NOTIFY OWNER OF PROPERTY, IF DAMAGE OCCURS.
5. LEAVE SKATINGAREAS AS CLEAN OR CLEANER THAN WHEN YOU STARTED.
FOR SAFETY OF PEDESTRIANS:
I. GIVE PEDESTRIANS THE RIGHT OF WAY.
2. AVOID BUSY SIDEWALKS.
3. DON'T SKATE IN FRONT OF DOORWAYS.
4. PICK UP YOUR SKATEBOARD WHEN CLOSE TO PEDESTRIANS,
5. BE POLITE.
FOR SAFETY OF SKATERS AND CARS:
1. DON'T RIDE IN THE STREET UNLESS IT 15 SAFE AND THERE IS NO SIDEWALks.
SKATEBOARD ETIQUETTE SURVEY
(Please print your business name,address and phone number.This will be kept confidential.)
DIRECTIONS
Please circle the response that best reflects your attitude for each question.
1. Are you aware of skateboarding in the downtown area? YES NO
2. Are you aware of the discussions between the City Council and the Skateboard Association on the
skateboarding issues and proposed controlling ordinances? YES NO
3. Have you noticed if areas of your property that receive skateboarding use,are left free of debris?
YES NO
4. Have customers commented about skateboarders outside of your establishment? YES NO
It yes,please describe.
5. Have you observed damage to your property from skateboarders wall riding,skating on planters,
landscaping, benches or tables? YES NO
If yes,did the skateboarder report the damage to the property owner? YES NO
Please briefly explain the incident in space provided.
6. Do you feel that an ordinance restricting the use of skateboards in the downtown business area needs
to be adopted? YES NO
If you answered yes, please explain why and which type of restrictions should be enforced.
7. if an ordinance was to be inacted which of the following areas would be of most concern to you?
A. In all public areas. C. in only the "Business Improvement Area"
B. In all commercial zoned areas. D. Other
The space below is provided for your comments.
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item: C_2
Through: Ray Windsor, City Manager Meeting Date: 3/13/90
From: Henry Engen, Community Development Director ,
SUBJECT:
Building and Construction Board of Appeals appointments. -
BACKGROUND:
The terms of three of the five members of the Building and
Construction Board of Appeals are expiring in April, 1990 as
follows:
Ken Lerno - specialty contractor
H. John Edens Jr. - general contractor
Jim Rodger - general public member
Messrs . Lerno and Edens were appointed in April, 1986 to four
year terms and Mr. Rodger was appointed in September, 1988 to
complete the remainder of the term of a member who resigned.
The Board of Appeals meets as needed to "conduct hearings to
determine the suitability of alternate materials and methods of
installation and to provide reasonable interpretations of the
provisions of" the building code.
There were two meetings in 1989, one of which was for election of
officers at their annual meeting and the second was to consider
an appeal in May of 1989.
The incumbent members have served the City well and have
indicated interest and willingness to continue serving the City
should the Council so desire.
RECOMMENDATION:
Reappoint three members as terms are expiring by adopting
Resolution No. 25-90.
HE:ps
Enclosure: Draft Resolution 25-90.
cc: Dave Baker, North County Contractors Association
RESOLUTION NO. 25-90
A RESOLUTION OF THE ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL
APPOINTING THREE (3) MEMBERS TO THE BUILDING AND
CONSTRUCTION BOARD OF APPEALS
WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted Title S relating to
establishment of a Building and Construction Board of appeals;
and
WHEREAS, the terms of three members of the Board will expire in
April, 1990; and
WHEREAS, incumbent members representing general contractor,
specialty contractor, and general public members, have served the
City in these capacities and are willing to continue service; and
NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Atascadero does
resolve to make the following appointments to the Board of
Construction Appeals for terms of four (4) years from this date:
1 . H. John Edens Jr. , general contractor
2 . Kenneth E. Lerno, specialty contractor
3 . Jim Rodger, general public
NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Atascadero does
further resolve that this resolution shall take effect
immediately.
On motion by , and seconded by
, the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its
entirety y the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
DATE ADOPTED:
By:
ROLLIN DEXTER, Mayor
City of Atascadero, California
ATTEST:
LEE DAYKA, Acting City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ARTHER MONTANDON, City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
RAY WINDSOR, City Manager
PREPARED BY:
HENRY ENGEN Conunun �YDev�. D rector
•
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM: C-3
CITY OF ATASCADERO
THROUGH Ray Windsor MEETING DATE: 3/13/90
City Manager
FROM: Andrew Takata, Director
Parks, Recreation and Zoo Department
SUBJECT•
CREATION OF A CREEKWAY PLANNING AND MAPPING COMMITTEE
RECOMMENDATION:
Create a technical committee of three ( G) Atascadero School
District representatives (Roder -ackery, Gene Elsdon, and Paul
lMoni and three City staff members (Henry LnOen--CGmmurlty
Development , Public Works Director , and Andrew Takata-Farks,
Recreation and Coo Director ) .
Since this is a technical advisory committee, the City Council
may choose only staff members . if it is the Council ' s desire
for additional citizen participation, they may appoint other
members .
BACKGROUND:
In order to becin the planning phase of the creekway plan! It is
important that a technical committee be formed to map the
creekway prior to additional planning .
AJT: kv
: creek
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item: C-4
Through : Ray Windsor , City Manager Meeting Date: 3/13/40
From: Mark Joseph, Administrative Services Director/,,P
SUBJECT: Creation of a Risk Review Committee
RECOMMIENDATION: Staff recommends Council endorse the concept of
a Risk Review Committee and select a Council representative.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
Currently, the City ' s liability and property insurance bill
runs $400,000 annually. Worker 's Compensation Insurance is
$130,000 and expected to grow significantly. As a result , risk
management costs represent a major and controllable expense to
the City.
With this in mind , a Risk Review Committee is proposed . The
committee would consist of the City Attorney, one member of
Council and myself. The committee would meet whenever a claim
against the City is filed or once a month to review the status of
pending cases. Quarterly reports to Council would be prepared ,
although individual cases could not be discussed .
The Committee would have authority to reject claims and/or
settle up to $10,000. The Committee would recommend action to
Council on cases over $10,000, or on Workers Compensation cases
involving substantial settlement costs. In addition, the
Committee would help formulate risk management policies. One
major objective of such policies would be to integrate a risk
management perspective into other policy arenas. This could
possibly be accomplished through the fiscal impact section of
Council Reports.
The advantage of a Risk Review Committee is threefold .
First , it would expedite minor cases. Second , it would provide
better oversight of our risk management process. Finally, by
considering the risk management implications, liability exposures
can be mitigated. Ultimately, cost savings should result .
This third advantage requires clarification. All actions
contain some risk . The existence of risk should not necessarily
lead to reducing services to the community. Rather , the intent
would be to mitigate the risk as much as possible, through better
planning , program design or implementation, and monitoring .
ALTERNATIVES:
1 . Continue the present arrangement . Council and staff would
tend to react to situations, rather than anticipate and
avoid problems.
Modify the composition and/or duties of the Committee. The
Committee was designed to be as efficient and effective as
possible, while maintaining adequate Council involvement .
FISCAL IMPACT•
No additional appropriations are needed to implement this
proposal . Ultimately, cost savings should result from reduced
insurance premiums.