Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 04/25/1989 BOYD C. SHARITZ CITY CLERK A G E N D A ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING ATASCADERO ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 6500 PALMA FOURTH FLOOR, ROTUNDA ROOM APRIL 25, 1989 7 :00 P.M. RULES OF PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: * Members of the audience may speak on any item on the agenda. * A person may speak for five (5) minutes . * No one may speak for a second time until everyone wishing to speak has had an opportunity to do so. * No one may speak more than twice on any item. * Council Members may question any speaker; the speaker may respond, but, after the allotted time has expired, may not • initiate further discussion. * The floor will then be closed to public participation and open for Council discussion. Call to Order Pledge of Allegiance ,/ Roll Call ✓ City Council Comment: * PROCLAMATIONS: "Special Olympics Day" , May 5, 1989 "GFWC California Federation Week" , April 23-29, 1989 ✓ COMMITTEE REPORTS: (The following represents ad hoc or standing committees . Infor- mative status reports will be given, as felt necessary. ) 1 . City/School Committee (See 3/31 Minutes, enclosed) 2 . North Coastal Transit (See enclosed summary)AF- 3 . S.L.O. Area Coordinating Council (Hold to May) ,- 4 . Traffic Committee (Hold to May)✓ 5 . Solid/Hazardous Waste Mgmt. Committee (Nothing to report) - 6 . Economic Opportunity Commission (Nothing to report),-- 7 . Finance Committee (Police Fac. , Lake Acquis. & Pavilion) (See Item C-3)-,- 8. Business Improvement Association (Nothing to report) 9 . Downtown Steering Committee (Next meets May 4th) ✓ i u COMMUNITY FORUM: The City Council values and encourages exchange of ideas and comments from you, the citizen. The Public Comment Period is provided to receive comments from the public on matters other than scheduled agenda items. To increase the effectiveness of Community Forum, the following rules will be enforced: * A maximum of 30 minutes will be allowed for Community Forum, unless Council authorizes an extension. * All remarks shall be addressed to Council, as a whole, and not to any individual member thereof. No person shall be permitted to make slanderous, profane or personal remarks against any Council Member or staff. Any person desiring to submit written statements to the Council may do so by forwarding nine (9) copies to the City Clerk by 5 :00 p.m. on the Wednesday preceding the Council Meeting. A. CONSENT CALENDAR: All matters listed under Item A, Consent Calendar, are considered • to be routine, and will be enacted by one motion in the form listed below. There will be no separate discussion on these items . A member of the Council or public may, by request, have any item removed from the Consent Calendar, which shall then be reviewed and acted upon separately after the adoption of the Con- sent Calendar. 1. APRIL 11, 1989 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 2. CITY TREASURER'S REPORT - MARCH, 1989 3 . CITY FINANCE DIRECTOR'S REPORT - MARCH, 1989 4. ACCEPTANCE OF FINAL TRACT MAP 18-88 - 3100 & 3150 E1 Camino Real (Golden West Community Partnership Ltd./Volbrecht) 5. RESOLUTION NO. 25-89 - ACCEPTANCE OF CEBADA ROAD INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED ROAD SYSTEM 6. CALTRANS AGREEMENT FOR SIGNAL EMERGENCY VEHICLE PRE-EMPT 7 . CLAIM OF MARYANNE NOLIN - Recommend denial �f 8. RESOLUTION NO. 23-89 - DECLARING WEEDS A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND COMMENCING PROCEEDINGS FOR ABATEMENT 2 B. HEARINGS/APPEARANCES: /1. HERITAGE TREE REMOVAL REQUEST - 7800 Balboa Road 2. ZONE CHANGE 17-88 - Danish Care Center A. Ordinance No. 194 — Amending the official Zoning Ordi- nance text regarding maximum population density allowed for group quarters (ZC 17-88: Danish Care Center) (1ST READING: Recommend (1) motion to waive reading of ordinance in full and approve by title only - Voice vote; (2) motion to approve Ord. No. 194 on first read- ing - Roll call) J - (First Nation- wide Mortgage Co./Davis/Volbrecht Surveys) A. Resolution No. 22-89 - Vacating a portion of a road pursuant to Streets & Highways Code; Part 3, Public Streets, Highways & Service Easements Vacation Law; Chapter 4, Summary Vacation; 8333 (Being a portion of • Sausilito Rd. ) �4. FLOOD HAZARD PREVENTION ORDINANCE (City of Atascadero) A. Ordinance No. 193 - Adding Chapter 2 to Article 7 of the City of Atascadero Municipal Code relating to flood damage prevention (1ST READING: Recommend (1) motion to waive reading of ordinance in full and approve by title only - Voice vote; (2) motion to approve Ord. No. 193 on first read- ing - Roll call) *** BREAK *** C. REGULAR BUSINESS: 1. ASBESTOS CHANGE ORDER - CITY HALL RENOVATION PROJECT 2. CITY HALL - Rotunda carpeting & permanent seating 3 . RESOLUTION NO. 24-89 - AUTHORIZING LONG-TERM DEBT FINANCING FOR NEEDED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS • 4 . RECYCLING DISCUSSION 5. ATASCADERO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT PROPOSAL - SUMMER SWIM PROGRAM 3 D. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION/AND OR ACTION: 1 . City Council -2. City Attorney 3 . City Clerk 4 . City Treasurer 5. City Manager: A. League of CA Cities Leadership Team workshop attendance postponement & rescheduling (verbal) B. League of CA Cities Downtown Revitalization Conference, June 28-29, Sacramento • 4 • PROCLAMATION FOR "SPECIAL OLYMPICS DAY" MAY 5 . 1989 WHEREAS , participation in Special Olvmaics contributes to the physical . social and psychological development of developmentally disabled participants : and WHEREAS , Special Olympics provides developmentally disabled participants with the opportunity for successful experiences in sports which develops confidence and builds a positive self-image: and WHEREAS . the City of Atascadero is hosting the Special Olympics Area Meet and making available the program benefits to developmentally disabled youth of the County of San Luis • Obispo . NOW. THEREFORE. I Bonita Borgeson , Mayor of Atascadero . do hereby proclaim May 5 , 1989 to be Special Olympics Day in Atascadero . California, and I urge all citizens to Give their support to this unique and highly beneficial program which gives the developmentally disabled their best opportunity to experience athletic competition and share in a mainstream community event . DATED: April 25, 1989 BONITA BORGESQ , Mayor ti • P R O C L A M A T I O N "GFWC California Federation Week" April 23-29, 1989 WHEREAS, the General Federation of Women' s Clubs is the largest volunteer organization of women in the world; and WHEREAS, the GFWC California Federation of Women' s Clubs and the GFWC California Juniors are the California branches of the international organization; and WHEREAS, the purpose of the GFWC California Federation of Women' s Clubs and the GFWC California Juniors is to improve the quality of life in their various communities through volunteer efforts; and WHEREAS, the GFWC California Federation of Women' s Clubs and • the GFWC California Juniors have designated the week of April 23- 29, 1989 as, "GFWC California Federation Week"; and WHEREAS, the Atascadero Junior Women' s Club has been asso- ciated with the GFWC California Federation of Women' s Clubs and the GFWC California Juniors since 1964 and has helped promote the betterment of our community and its citizenship; NOW, THEREFORE, I, Bonita Borgeson, Mayor of the City of Atascadero, do hereby proclaim April 23-29, 1989 as "GFWC Cali- fornia Federation Week" and call upon all citizens to recognize the service given this community by our Federated clubs and honor them. BONITA BORGESON, Mayor City of Atascadero, CA Dated: April 25 , 1989 • kETIN AGENDA DATEM�., ITEM N �� • MINUTES - CITY/SCHOOL COMMITTEE March 31 , 1989 - 2 :30 p.m. City Administration Building, Club Room ROLL CALL: City: Councilmembers Bob Lilley & Rollin Dexter; Henry Engen, Dir. of Community Development; Bud McHale, APD Chief; Officer John Rogers, APD; Paul Sensi- baugh, Public Works Dir. ; Andy Takata, Parks & Rec. Director; Jeffrey Jorgensen, City Attorney AVSD: Boardmembers Orville Horst & Roy King; Supt. Anthony Avina; Ernie Taylor, Business Mgr. It was pointed out that Ray Windsor was unable to attend due to a last-minute conflict. In addition, the meeting agenda would be • rearranged pending arrival of Councilman Lilley. 2. A. RECREATION ISSUES Supt. Avina expressed the School District' s interest in the Ci- ty' s interest in a Jr. High intramural program, which would need at least two people. Alternatives include using either City per- sonnel and/or School District personnel . Andy Takata indicated he needed to talk to the City Manager and Council and that he would work up comparative budget figures for use of recreation supervisors . The district will provide costs data via Principal Diane Brokaw. B. SWIMMING POOL PROGRAM Following analysis of costs, Andy Takata will report on this mat- ter to the City Council for direction. The advantages of City operation would include longer hours of availability to the pub- lic. Currently, the program runs after school closes for the summer and before it opens in the fall. C. SAN GABRIEL BACKSTOPS It was reported that two are being laid out now, and a third is being delayed due to AT&T underground lines . The Oak Hill con- tinuation School will also be getting a backstop. 1 • 4 . D.A.R.E. PROGRAM Chief McHale introduced School Resource officer John Rogers, who has just returned from a Drug Abuse Resistence and Education pro- gram seminar, which is being proposed to be established with a position funded by a 50/50 contribution between the City and School District. Officer Rogers distributed outlines of the 17 lessons proposed to be given, on a continuing basis, to 6th grad- ers, a key age group in the anti-drug training program ( see at- tached) . Under discussion, suggestion was made that, should the program be established, parents should be included and that the program be coordinated with existing programs, such as the current self- esteem program. Consensus was to avoid duplication and attempt to protect the hours available for the basic education curricu- lum. Currently, there is one class held for the 6th grade on drug education. The proposed program will be evaluated during the budget process and also evaluated with respect to whether a full-time position is needed or not. 3. SKATEBOARDING • Chief McHale referenced memorandum to the City Council on the subject for review and discussion, and school members present supported the concept of police being able to cite people for violations on City and on school properties . The Police Chief will bring the matter formally to the School District. 1. LEWIS AVE. BRIDGE AGREEMENT/PLACEMENT OF PORTABLE CLASS- ROOMS Dr. Avina referenced the draft lease agreement in the agenda packet for location and realignment of Lewis Ave. Bridge and use of properties for portable classrooms . The School District is desirous of ordering portables, which requires indicating their locations for State approval. Councilman Lilley expressed con- cern over the 25-year time period and desires to refine the draft agreement. Jeff Jorgensen indicated that this was a first review of a dis- cussion draft for the agreement. Ernie Taylor indicated that it would take 2-3 months to get word back from the State. It' s possible that there could be a change work order if the proposed temporary classroom locations were to change. City representa- tives indicated it would take approximately three weeks to review • the draft. 2 5. CREERWAY PLAN Councilman Lilley advised on the community support for creekway development and safe pedestrian routes throughout the community and sought School District support to extend them from Lewis Ave. to the High School site, with coordinated access points meeting the schools ' needs . It was agreed to put this matter on the next agenda for further discussion. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 4 :03 P.M. MINUTES RECORDED BY: HENRY ENGENA Dire or of Community Development • HE:cw Attachment: D.A.R.E. Lessons • 3 DARE LESSONS 1. PRACTICES FOR PERSONAL SAFETY — Used to acquaint students with role of police and review practices for.safety of students. 2. DRUG USE AP40 P.IISUSE — Helps students understand harmful effects of drugs if they are misused. 3. CONSEQUENCES — Helps students understand that there are many consequences, both positive and negative, that result from using and choosing not to use drugs. 4. RESISTING PRESSURES TO USE DRUGS — To make students aware of kinds of peer pressure they may face and to help them learn to say no to offers to use drugs. 5. RESISTANCE TECHNIQUES - WAYS TO SAY NO - Teaches students ways to say no in resisting various types of pressure. 6. BUILDING SELF•ESTEEN,1 — Helps students understand that self-image results from positive and negative feelings and experiences. 7. ASSERTIVENESS: A RESPONSE STYLE* — Teaches that assertiveness is a response style that enables a person to state his or her own rights without loss of self-esteem. 8. MANAGING STRESS V41THOUT TAKING DRUGS — Helps students recognize stress . and suggests ways to deal with it other than by taking drugs. 9. MEDIA INFLUENCES ON DRUG USE — Helps students develop the understanding and • skills needed to analyze and resist media presentations about alcohol and drugs. 10. DECISION MAKING AND RISK TAKING — Helps students apply the decision making process in evaluating the results of various kinds of risk-taking behavior, including that of drug use. 11. ALTERNATIVES TO DRUG USE — Helps students find out about activities that are interesting and rewarding and that are better than taking drugs. 12. ROLE MODELING — Older student leaders and other positive role models that do not use drugs talk to younger students to clarify the misconception that drug users are in the majority. 13. FORMING A SUPPORT SYSTEM — Students will be able to develop positive relation- ships with many different people in order to form a support system. 14. RESISTING GANG PRESSURES Students will be able to identify situations in which they may be pressured by gangs and to evaluate the consequences of the choices available to them. 15. DARE SUMMARY — Helps students summarize and assess what they learned from the program. 16. TAKING A STAND — Students complete own commitment and present to class. Helps them respond effectively when pressured to use drugs. „; • 17. CULMINATION —Special exercise for all students. DMEET�4 rMM't AGENDAI& er- ATe MEMORANDUM City of Atascaderc, Apr JA 1 19, 1192'? TO: C !-TTY OUNCIL !-TTY .1 FROM: ROLL IN DEXTER VIA: CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: CCRT� PO4,Prl MEETING SUMMARY ,, he rp.ai-in topic for discussion at the April I?th . meeting of the Board of Directors was a revie---j of the +indin=s and recommendations as -a -ud conducted Pat nut! ined in the t'.orth County Transport. -tion. st y conducled by Piras Consulting Ser%:ices. This ninety--fivpsv e age study gives _. very detailed det.aiied account o-F existing r services in the North t"ounty and rrel .ates them. to the socio-ecoriorPic and derricigraphic needs :,-F the area. Atascadero Comes off 1 as 4:ar as its existing serl....'ices are I A concerned. D ". L-A-R-11DE , RUNABOUT, ',"CRT4�.' s "Roull-e 5"' , +1 h e S e n A4 or C.itizens, United van , and Greyhound form a. fair' netk-,tork 0r possibilities for rider diependant persons. Howeve-r, , ther-e -are s-l- J 1 1 ga.ps in the systern iAjh i ch II most I i Vel .y be cured by ;-;. closer coordimz:tion of the ex-istin sy tems -In �San Luis Spo' A Obil "tascadero and Paso RobleS. A maJ or recommendation appro.,,ed by the CCRTA ttciard t,!Ziks axl extension of service to Paso Robles and the addition of a third round trip bett,.!een San Luis Obispo and the Nci!­ th Count;'. I_ d Further coo!--dination of in the Count ' ShOul e-- the gen er R ! m o t,i 1, i t y _}f t h e p o p w I o u s and i 1 1, ;.jn d c,u b t e d 1 m e a n that +h e / S s.--ari ou s Gover nmen t k,?i t u n dou b t ed 1 y r eed to r en eqto t i 'TPA Rc c or d 44 n g I y There t 1'`.e( y be budgetary m at e r s t c, c o n s i d e r a.s u'le I I . The advam*=- e o f a t h i 1J r ci u nd t r i p b e t ix,e e n N c,r t h is c,u,n t ,, a,n d c_'a.n _1 u 41 s 0 b i s r o k.,j Ji I e i r, i.I-)e g r e a.-11 s-r +e 1 x i b i I i +-y -4 o r m e d i c a_1 t!-, e 1 student tr.?.nspcir-tation , governmental businesss :=-�nd shopping in each of +1 h e commercial areas. ' a For- instance, students traveling iriom North County to Cuesta, ,PC-1 Y n d other schools l..,jouild be able to lir_­�.t''e in the early morm.ing and r'et'urn Cin the mid-day ru-n rather tha.n beirog forced to w.--a-it u7iti " the late -.f t -i n ­: , I I- e n f k.er m ocin r u n . Th i s k,,i i I also ass-limst heretofore , se' -, iced areas i ', San Mi guel (p�ark and ride,' , Tempi eton and .. an to M a r g ami i f a t=, t r-aa v e I t ci and from the other area.s. The actions of CCRTA an dSLOAC(_'. st.ou I d hemi ex t-abl i sh a gr ea t er de9r.ee of flexibility A convenience for meetinunmet needs. Ecologically r _ it is a. step in the ri-ght direction as far as taking some single c-ccupant automobiles off the roads as convenient and economical alternative trAnsportation becomes clvai l abl e. Rollin Int. Dexter Board Member ,CC.,RTA and rep. to North Coz_r:ty Task; Force MEE�'tZ� � DA'q ITEM ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 11 , 1989 The regular meeting of the Atascadero City Council was called to order by Mayor Borgeson at 7:05 p .m. , followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL: Full Council Present: Councilmembers Dexter , Lilley (arrived at 7:08 p .m. ) Mackey, Shiers and Mayor Borgeson. Staff Present : Paul Sensibaugh , Public Works Director ; Henry Engen, Director of Community Development ; Mark Joseph , Director of Administrative Services; Jeff Jorgensen, City Attorney; Bud McHale, Police Chief; Andy Takata, Director of Parks, Recreation and Zoo; and Boyd Sharitz, City Clerk . • Mayor Borgeson read proclamations for the following : California Earthquake Preparedness Month , April 1989 National Library Week , April 9-15, 1989 Tri Counties Small Business Opportunities Day, April 30, 1989. COMMITTEE REPORTS: S.L.O. AREA COORDINATING COUNCIL Mayor Borgeson reported that a meeting will be held on the 19th of April and they will be looking at unmet public transit needs determination. Three requests met the definition of unmet transit needs: 1 ) extended regional transit services in the north county 2) general public transportation system in Paso Robles and 3) an increase regional handicapped transit services. They will also be working on will be a final determination of the one year San Luis Obispo south county area transit service. SOLID/HAZARDOUS WASTE MGT. COMMITTEE Councilwoman Mackey stated she went to a meeting last week . One item on their agenda was the hazardous waste plan. All of the other cities besides Atascadero have passed it. and will be forwarded to Sacramento . Recycling will be a big issue in the waste management commission. She will be meeting with Bill Gibbs • from Wil Mar Disposal on Wednesday regarding recycling and welcomes other members of the council if they would like to attend that 9:30 a.m. meeting. ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION Councilman Dexter said he represented the Council last Saturday at a dedication of a new head start facility at Camp Arroyo Grande. • FINANCE COMMITTEE City Manager , Ray Windsor , said that the Council Sub-Committee- and staff met last week to discuss capital facility long term debt financing . As a result of that meeting staff is in the process of putting together a report in draft form for the sub- committee and he is hoping to have that for Council for the next council meeting . DOWNTOWN STEERING COMMITTEE Councilwoman Mackey reported that a meeting was held on March 29th and a brainstorming session went on for three hours. There were a lot of ideas which will be forwarded to the consultant . CITY/SCHOOL COMMITTEE Councilman Lilley stated a meeting was held at which time they discussed the draft of the lease agreement regarding placement of temporary facilities. He had asked that the agenda include an item addressing the Creekway Plan and the prospects of exploring some city/school district cooperation to the JPA as a possible way to expedite the implementation of that plan. He met with Dr . Avina who indicated that he had some very positive response from within the district and his own staff. • COMMUNITY FORUMm Doug Lombardo expressed his concerns about 4-wheel drive vehicles that are driving through the Salinas River . They are releasing oil and fuel from these vehicles. This is affecting his drinking water . He said the police department ' s hands are tied because they have no way to get down in that area. They need a vehicle which would aid them in policing this area. Councilman Lilley suggested that staff explore some appropriate ordinance to prohibit that kind of activity in the creekway. Mayor Borgeson asked staff to look into this and report back to the Council at a future time. Terry Graham discussed the need for an Architectural Review Committee. Mayor Borgeson reminded Mr. Graham that a meeting will be held Thursday, April 13 at which time this will be discussed . At this time City Manager , Ray Windsor said that an error was made on the agenda. Items B 1 and 2 should have been included as part of the Consent Calendar and Council should act on this "as • items A 1-4. A. CONSENT CALENDARS 1 . MARCH 289 1989 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES • 2. RESOLUTION NO. 21-89 - ADOPTING THE S.LO. COUNTY AND INCORPORATED CITIES HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN 3. - TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 24-88 - 8005 San Gabriel Rd. (Kennedy/ Stewart) : Request to subdivide two existing lots of 9.35 ac. total into three parcels containing 2.50, 2.50 and 4.35 ac. each 4. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 1-89 - 8625 Atascadero Ave. ( Iverson/Central Coast Engineering) : Request to subdivide 13.9 ac. each. The request includes establishment of two new City standard roads to serve the subdivision: Via Tortuga and Calle Refugio. Mayor Borgeson said she would like to pull item A-2 for further discussion. MOTION: By Councilman Dexter , seconded by Councilwoman Mackey for approval of consent calendar items A 1 , 3, and 4. Passed unanimously by roll call vote. Mayor Borgeson expressed her concerns about site one being the • central site chosen and feels that it is not an adequate site. Council discussion followed. MOTION: By Councilwoman Mackey, seconded by Councilman Lilley for approval of Resolution 21-89. Passed 3:2 by roll call vote with Councilman Shiers and Mayor Borgeson voting no . C. REGULAR BUSINESS: 1 . TREE ORDINANCE REVISION: REFERRAL TO PLANNING COMMISSION (Continued from 3/28/89) Report was given by Councilmen Shiers and Dexter . Lengthy Council discussion followed. Council requested that this be referred to the Planning Commission on May 2, 1989 for a report back to the City Council within 40 days and then set a date of public hearing . Council directed City Manager Ray Windsor to meet with Andy Takata and Henry Engen to prepare a job description for a City Arborist/Urban Forester on a part-time or contractor basis. Council also directed Henry Engen, Community Development Director to prepare a resolution for the tree value and 3 • replacement costs.. At this time Mayor Borgeson asked for public comments. Mr . R. C. Thorpe stated he was disappointed in the fact that it seems to him that not the City Council but the staff were running "this thing" . He feels that many things in this "draft" tree ordinance, if they were to be instituted what it would amount to , is driving every legitimate contractor out of the City of Atascadero. " If you put this through as it was drafted or handed to the Council tonight , which you are not going to do , I am glad to see, but if you did you would wonder why in the world the cost of living here is so high, along with the contractors would go your support" . He pointed out that this arborist would be hired and he would need a secretary, a helper , and an office and pretty soon it is a short time before you have another layer of government that has not and is still not needed here. Mayor Borgeson reminded Mr. Thorpe that a public hearing will be held when this comes back from the Planning Commission. Helen Weaver said she is in agreement with many things that • Mr . Thorp stated. She is disappointed because it looks like even-though the public may have something to say, she thinks we are well on the road to putting this through just the way it is. She doesn' t believe we need an arborist hired by the City. She thinks the City has qualified people that should be able to protect the trees and thinks most people here in Atascadero are interested in protecting the trees. Marjorie Kidwell stated this third draft is definitely not a result of the input that she heard at the study. She is not aware of any public hearing that the Planning Commission ever had on this issue. She knows there have been studies, but there has never been an original public hearing since the original tree draft that was adopted over a year ago . Mayor Borgeson stated she agreed with Mrs. Kidwell . Mrs. Kidwell continued by saying that when the original tree ordinance was adopted a year and 5 months ago , it was with the understanding there would be a review of it in six months. That review was not a public review, it was a draft written (35 pages) by the Tree Committee. It was presented by the Tree Committee and it was well done with a lot of hard work , but doesn ' t believe the public ever had any input. City Attorney, Jeff Jorgensen, responded that to this point the staff has simply carried out the desire of the Council to develop a draft ordinance with the direction of the tree 4 • sub-committee based upon the joint City Council/Planning Commission meeting and staff will certainly review all the procedures necessary to bring it properly before the City Council . Doug Sheffer complimented the Council on the discussion that went on tonight that touched on a number of things that he was concerned about . If the Council doesn' t pick out a few things such as "save the oaks" and "pass an ordinance that people will support" Council will be wasting their time. if the public doesn ' t like it , they will always find a way around it. He thanked Council for all their hard work . AT 9s50 P.M. MAYOR BORGESON ASKED FOR A RECESS. MEETING RECONVENED AT 10s1O P.M. 2. FUNDING COMMUNITY AGENCY REQUESTS Staff report was given by City Manager , Ray Windsor . Consensus of Council was that this would be a good way to • aid in determining how to allocate the resources to be used in funding community agency requests. - 3. SENATOR ROBBINS REQUEST FOR COUNCIL LETTER OF ENDORSEMENT SB 103 Staff report was given by City Manager , Ray Windsor . Council discussion followed. MOTIONS By Mayor Borgeson, seconded by Councilwoman Mackey to support SB 103. Passed unanimously by roll call vote. D. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION/AND OR ACTIONS 1 . City Council : A. Summary of sub-committee meetings Mayor Borgeson stated that reports on sub-committee meetings will be given once a month instead of at each council meeting . Cindy Wilkins and Ray Windsor will ask each council member before the agenda is prepared if they have anything to report regarding their sub- committee meetings. Mayor Borgeson asked each council • member if they would prepare written reports regarding any of their meetings. City Manager : 5 Ray Windsor stated that a League of California Cities Annual Workshop & Quarterly Meeting will be held on Friday, May 5 in Solvang . Deadline for registration is April 28th . He reminded Council that Thursday is the monthly Chamber meeting . Councilmembers Shiers and Mackey expressed interest in attending this meeting . He also reminded Council that on the 26th there is a seminar in Lake Tahoe. Mayor Borgeson said she will be out of town and will not be able to attend the joint Planning Commission, Parks and Recreation and City Council Meeting on Thursday. She asked Mayor Pro-Tem Dexter to handle that meeting. COUNCIL MEETING ADJOURNED AT 10:35 P.M. TO A JOINT MEETING WITH THE CITY'S PLANNING AND PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSIONS ON THURSDAY, APRIL 13, 1989, AT 7:00 P.M. IN THE FOURTH FLOOR ROTUNDA ROOM FOR DISCUSSION REGARDING THE GENERAL PLAN. MINUTES RECORDED BY: BOYD C. SHARITZ, CITY CLERK . PREPARED BY: GEORGIA RAMIREZ, DEPUTY CITY CLERK 6 MEE7t AGENDA • DA g�ITEM1 " ,Z CITY OF ATASCADERO SCHEDULE OF CASH RECEIPTS AND TRANSFERS IN TREASURER' S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF MARCH, 1989 CASH RECEIPTS: Taxes : Property Taxes 40 ,889.44 Sales Tax 129 ,052.66 Motor Vehicle In-Lieu 66 ,874.71 Cigarette Tax 2 ,639.43 Development Impact Tax 4 ,627.00 Miscellaneous Taxes 295.26 Sanitation Fees 13,497. 60 Licenses/Permits/Fees 57,917. 83 Franchise Fees 81,208. 17 Fines/Penalties/Overages 623.52 Investment Earnings 834.62 P.O.S.T. Reimbursement 1,038.41 Narcotic Officer Reimbursement 13,175.14 Sales-Maps/Publications/Reports 446.40 Weed Abatement 1,544.66 Police Services 225.00 Parks and Recreation Fees 29 ,121.14 Gas Tax 50 ,019.29 Traffic Safety 5 ,746.09 Local Transportation 4,096. 30 Development Fees 108,616.27 Zoo Reserve 29.00 Assessments (Districts 3, 4 & 5) 4 ,479.00 Zoo Receipts 4 ,891.65 Amapoa-Tecorida/Lewis Ave. 8,088.00 TOTAL CASH RECEIPTS 629,976.59 FUND TRANSFERS IN: Sanitation Fund Reimbursement 98,550. 70 OTHER CASH RECEIPTS: Buil/Refundable Bonds 825.00 Reimbursement to Expense 2,830.75 Refunds 7,163.50 TOTAL OTHER CASH RECEIPTS 10 ,819.25 • CITY OF ATASCADERO CASH ACTIVITY SUMMARY TREASURER' S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF MARCH, 1989 BEGINNING CASH RESOURCES 6 ,760 ,137. 77 ADD: RECEIPTS 739 ,346.54 FUND TRANSFERS 2 ,200 ,000.00 LESS: DISBURSEMENTS 843 ,332. 67 FUND TRANSFERS 2 ,2OO ,000.00 ENDING CASH RESOURCES 6 ,656 ,151.64 SCHEDULE OF CASH RESOURCES Int. Due AS OF MARCH 31, 1989 Rate Date Checking Account: Mid-State Bank 35 ,099.25 • Certificates of Deposit: Butterfield Savings 99 ,000.00 9. 95 07/11/89 First Cal Savings 99,000.00 8. 90 05/16/89 Other Investments : Local Agency Inv Fund 4,025,000.00 8. 87 N/A Fed Home Loan Bank Discount Note-City 957,711. 00 9.15 06/21/89 Fed Home Loan Bank Discount Note-Sanit. ' 937,537.50 9.12 10/24/89 Fed Farm Credit Note 502 ,263.89 10.16 09/01/89 Other Cash Resources : Petty Cash 540.00 TOTAL CASH RESOURCES 6 ,656,151.64 GERE SIBBACH j V • City Treasurer • MEETI AGENDA DATE. ZS -- ITEM� CITY OF ATASCADERO SCHEDULE OF DISBURSEMENTS FINANCE DIRECTOR'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF MARCH, 1989 DISBURSEMENTS Hand Warrant Register for March, 1989 3,072.77 03/03/89 Accounts Payable Warrants 123 ,720. 36 03/10/89 Accounts Payable Warrants 37,237.23 03/17/89 Accounts Payable Warrants 99 ,715. 37 03/24/89 Accounts Payable Warrants 79 ,042.94 03/31/89 Accounts Payable Warrants 99,039.51 Service Charge-Mastercard/Visa 7.50 03/31/89 Wire Transfers 2 ,402 ,342.02 03/01/89 Payroll Checks #45338-45473 1051545.05 03/15/89 Payroll Checks #45474-45604 103,128.14 03/29/89 Payroll Checks #45605-45735 104 ,374.00 03/31/89 Sanitation Check #273 98,550.70 Total 31255 ,775.59 LESS : Voided Check #45018 6 ,280.48 • Voided Check #45144 3,642. 82 Voided Check #45330 30.00 Voided Check #45589 147.60 Total Disbursements 3 ,245 ,674.69 I, MARK A. JOSEPH, do hereby certify and declare that demands enumerated and referred to in the foregoing register are accurate and just claims against the City and that there are funds available for payment thereof in the City Treasury. The breakdown detail on all accounts is available for your viewing in the Finance office. MARK A.( OSEPH Administrative Services Director W11A • M E M O R A N D U M TO: City Council April 25, 1989 VIA: Ray Windsor, City Manager FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director 4V& SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF FINAL TRACT MAP 18-88 LOCATION: 3100 and 3150 E1 Camino Real APPLICANT: Golden West Community Partnership Ltd. (Volbrecht) BACKGROUND: • On November 8, 1988, the City Council approved Tentative Tract Map 18-88, subject to certain conditions and in concurrence with the recommendation of the Planning Commission. RECOMMENDATION: The required conditions have been complied with and the final map is recommended for approval . HE :ps cc: Golden West Community Partnership Ltd. Volbrecht Surveys Tartaglia-Hughes • � 1 ■-_ ,�,'uN �11{111 . i I . � �� y� . , _ gill, ■■ �� s d OAT4:�2&%TA • MEMORANDUM TO: Citv Council THROUGH: Ray Windsor , City Manager FROM: Paul Sensibaugh , Director of Public Works SUBJECT : Road Acceptance Resolution DATE: April 17, 1989 Recommendation : Staff recommends that Council approve the attached Resolution accepting Cebada Road into the city-maintained road system. (Resolution No. 25-89) Background: The road referred to here was constructed in 1987 by the Gordon T . Davis Cattle Co . and Don Messer, in accordance with plans approved by the City Engineer . The road was held for a one-year warranty period, at the end of which several corrections involving pavement , curbing, drainage and slopes were required. Another year was required for the corrections . Now all required inspections have been completed and the road has been determined to be acceptable , and can be added to the City Maintained mileage. Fiscal Impact : By accepting this road into the city-maintained system the city will become responsible for the repair , however, no significant work is expected for several years . i RESOLUTION NO. 25-89 RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO ACCEPTING CEBADA ROAD FROM THE INTERSECTION OF SANTA ANA TO THE END The Council of the City of Atascadero resolves as follows : 1 . Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1806 of the California Streets and Highways Code , the following street is hereby accepted into the city street system: Street Name Length in Feet Miles Cebada Road 2 , 383+- .45 ` 2 . A copy of this resolution shall be furnished to : Gordon T . Davis Cattle Co. and Don Messer On motion by Council Member and seconded by Council Member , the Atascadero City Council hereby adopts the foregoing resolution in its entirety on the following roll call vote : AYES : NOES : ABSENT : ADOPTED: ATTEST : BOYD C . SHARITZ BONITA BORGESON, Mayor City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: JEFFREY G. JORGENSEN PAUL M. SENSIBAUGH City Attorney Director of Public Works . ♦ ►�Ir1 ,�,..� ��� � �'::��� � ��� ��. �' C�� �;, , �� ,� _ ►`�'EaTRA, c V�Li 9y'�1 )t f t QQJ1 m PO� `C v�1`A_V�EaF 2 FEP ''J -te t• i' kt. Q��Y � ► y 7\ 2 mac,` �GM IOc/e 'P i \G S �' i �J.� .sem ^`,19 �L G �F,y20• � - 6 'xh \ � iGNPO'VE OOI iIs QO p0�� 44 ►ei� m1 / o. Ori Z`t �4LBS AVE •� ��p� Z FAb . J, 6.� � NOG �\ !�, te•: i1LLTOP `0 `� �,f Ro TRANOUtLtA a �'' LF` /ra Q O Z4 O pt�LO_A�: P �'�.SZQ�r---'_ �a'�> o p%0 ) -,ft FRESNO lOBILE HOME PARK o Cs GO�\ - Q ROGOS < �y�AS(� REAL NO 40OLSS] EL \7 I O \� CAMS' _�f. P �M f:i iS1�N pAUt. ,F,, AROIu 0 A IV 101 P' . . \ h QOtO RAMONA' � '„' �•9 R>so mo C RG aAMONA RC ��i0 s�A4 RD C VENAOO/' RD \cH MONTEREY �--- -�/ ��` 0 ,v> ; 200 2830 FS q - �Z G LONG F9 9G CASCABE !-I, ?O t RANCH ' Rp AN00 ftbb tit- z 'NA . SANTA J ,kTA E/yGMA,V !0r 3.4 p' .E•2 sl r' '+ LLAN0 1 LA- J-4 PARADISE VALLEY 2-3 O 1 se ' rl A.2 / l+g -��•— --� 3.2 to 2.3 \..0s0 O LOMITAS„ 3.2 ; E♦ 1 �. E: wc+A Ro J� SANTA LUCIA RD ao 3.a S NAUU!�4&qiTFM� MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Through: Ray Windsor, City Manager From: Paul M. Sensibaugh, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Subject : Caltrans Agreement for Signal Emergency Vehicle Pre-empt Date : April 18, 1989 Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the attached agreement . Background: The West Mall/E1 Camino Real traffic signal installation project includes an emergency vehicle pre-empt identical to those on the San Anselmo/ECR and Traffic Way/ECR signals . The operation and maintenance on the West Mall signal is detailed in a former agreement to be 67% State and 33% Local . The bid item for the pre- empt hardware and software (which incidently was a part of the original agreement) is a 100% Local cost item. Caltrans, therefore, is attempting through the attached proposed agreement to allocate 100% of the O&M for that unit only to the Local Agency (City) . Discussion: Staff does not have a problem with this agreement since the pre- empt itself is no direct benefit to Caltrans. The situation could have been addressed in the previous agreement presented by Caltrans, but there was some confusion between the Caltrans design staff and the Caltrans contracts staff as to identity of the part . Fiscal Impact: There additional cost to the City will be the difference of Caltrans sharing the 0 & M cost for the unit on a 67-33 basis and Caltrans having no share in the 0 & M for this item only. All other items in the original agreement remain unchanged. Since the cost in the original contract ($8,000) is included in the amount that must -be given up front to Caltrans, and by this agreement must be paid up front ($5,000) again, staff has argued that a deletion is warranted in the original total . Caltrans agrees but doesn' t want to reopen the original g P g agreement, arguing that the final cost to the city for construction is based on actual costs and any overages or credits will be settled at the end of the project . For the sake of reducing red tape, staff is in agreement with that stand. It is not known at this time whether the City will earn interest on any withheld monies throughout the length of the construction. NOTE: This project was supposedly scheduled for bid this Spring, but Caltrans was recently talking Summer. It is encouraging that the attached cover letter is asking for action on this item prior to May 1 , 1989, "since this traffic signal project is ready to be advertised" . The City staff is continuing to encourage Caltrans to complete the signalization portion of the work prior to the next school year, thus eliminating the need for the crossing guard at that intersection. (The request was received by the City on April 7 which was after the April it Agenda was printed. ) STATE OF CALIFORNIA—BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN, Governor DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION q. BOX 8114 ••d LUIS OBISPO, CA 93403-8114 DD (805) 549-3259 April 5, 1989 05-SLO-41-16. 22 State Highway Route 41 (El Camino Real) at West Mall Dist. Agreement No. 5CA8906 05-252-254701 Mr. Paul Sensibaugh Public Works Director City of Atascadero P.O. Box 747 Atascadero, CA 93423 Dear Mr. Sensibaugh: ® Attached for execution are the original and four copies of the Cooperative Agreement between the State and the City of Atascadero for the installation of signal preemption equipment at the intersection of El Camino Real and West Mall with State Highway Route 41. After execution by authorized City officials, please return the original and three copies with a copy of the authorizing resolution attached to each copy for .execution by the State no later than May 1, 1989, since this traffic signal project is ready to be advertised. A fully executed copy will be returned for your files. Sincerely, . QrV7d &hff 4 Darleen J. Osborne Asst. Transportation Engr. Cooperative Agreement Section Attachment } 05-SLO-41-16.2 05-252-254701 City of Atascadero District Agreement #5CA8306 COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, ENTERED INTO ON is between the STATE OF CALIFORNIA, acting by and through its Department of Transportation, referred to herein as "STATE, " and CITY OF ATASCADERO, a body politic and a municipal corporation of the State of California, referred to herein as "CITY" RECITALS ( 1) STATE and CITY contemplate installing traffic signals and safety lighting (and performing roadwork) at the intersection of E1 Camino Real and West Mall with State Highway Route 41, referred to herein as "PROJECT_ " (2) CITY desires to include signal preemption equipment in PROJECT and is willing to bear the entire expense thereof. (3) STATE and CITY desire to specify the terms and conditions under which such signal preemption equipment is to be installed, financed and maintained. SECTION I STATE AGREES: ( 1) To provide all necessary preliminary engineering, including plans and specifications, and include the signal preemption equipment in PROJECT which STATE will construct and provide all necessary construction engineering services. (2) To maintain and operate the signal preemption equipment as installed, at no cost to STATE. Said maintenance shall include preemption operational timing_ (3) To submit to CITY quarterly, a statement of accumulated costs, identifying actual hours worked and related expenses in connection with the services provided pursuant to this Agreement. • 1 • SECTION II CITY AGREES: ( 1) To deposit with STATE within 30 days of receipt of billing therefor (which billing will be forwarded immediately following STATE's bid advertising date of a construction contract for PROJECT) , the amount of $5,000, which figure represents CITY's estimated costs to have the signal preemption equipment constructed by STATE. Said costs include preliminary and construction engineering, both of which will be 22% of the actual final construction cost. (2) To pay STATE upon completion of all work and within 30 days of receipt of a detailed statement made upon final accounting of costs therefor, any amount over and above the aforesaid advance deposit required to complete the CITY's financial obligation pursuant to this Agreement. (3) To reimburse STATE upon receipt of a statement, for the cost of maintenance of said signal preemption equipment, such cost is estimated to be $300.00 yearly. (4) To reimburse STATE upon receipt of Statement, for the cost of operation in accordance with the Agreement for maintenance of State Highways in the City. (5) To provide STATE with the following spare parts at the Caltrans San Luis Obispo Maintenance Station: discriminator module, optical detector and discriminator assembly. Such parts will be replaced by CITY, upon STATE notifying CITY of their need. (6) To monitor the use of equipment so that transmitter units shall be used only on those emergency vehicles shown on Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part of this Agreement, and only during Code 3 (Red Light and Siren) emergency response runs. SECTION III IT IS MUTUAT,TY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: ( 1) All obligations of STATE under the terms of this Agreement are subject to the appropriation of resources by the Legislature and the allocation of resources by the California Transportation Commission. (2) A unilateral termination of this Agreement may be made by either party; however, CITY will bear 100% of all costs incurred by STATE in either case. 2 (3) The cost of any STATE engineering or maintenance • referred to herein shall include all direct and indirect costs (functional and administrative overhead assessment) attributable to such work, applied in accordance with STATE's standard accounting procedures. (4) Neither STATE nor any officer or employee thereof shall be responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by CITY under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to CITY under this Agreement. It is also agreed that, pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, CITY shall fully indemnify and hold STATE harmless from any liability imposed for injury (as defined by Government Code Section 810.8) occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by CITY under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to CITY under this Agreement. (5) Neither CITY nor any officer or employee thereof shall be responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by STATE under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction not delegated to CITY under this Agreement. It is also agreed that, pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, STATE shall fully indemnify and hold CITY harmless from any liability imposed for injury (as defined by Government Code Section 810.8) occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by STATE under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction not delegated to CITY under this Agreement. (6) That Exhibit A is to be amended as the existing vehicles are retired or replaced. 3 (7 ) That this Agreement shall terminate upon • completion and acceptance of the PROJECT by STATE and CITY or on June 30, 1991, whichever is earlier in time; however, the ownership and maintenance clauses shall remain in effect until terminated, in writing, by mutual agreement_ STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITY OF ATASCADERO Department of Transportation ROBERT K_ BEST Director of Transportation By Mayor By District Director Date: Date: Attest: Approved as to Form and Procedure City Clerk • Attorney, Department of Date: Transportation Date: Approved as to Content Certified as to Funds and Procedure Public Works Director Date: District Accounting Officer Date: Approved as to Form By City Attorney Date: • 4 05 SL 0-41-16.2 05-252-254701 City of Atascadero District Agreement No. 5CA8906 EXHIBIT A TYPE OF ENGINE DESIGNATOR YEA$ LICENSE NO. MODEL Wildland B-9 1972 E593525 Fleetstar Rescue R-1 1982 E786033 Chevy 1 Ton Structure E-1 1984 E491855 Pierce Arrow Structure E-2 1987 E098605 Pierce Dash • 5 DAT yr AGENDA�� ffEO M E M O R A N D U M TO: City Council FROM: Ray Windsor, City Manager SUBJECT: Claim of Maryanne Nolin DATE: April 25 , 1989 BACKGROUND Claimant was terminated from teaching exercise for the Parks & Recreation Dept. and wishes to be reimbursed for money she gave to a third party for exercise tapes, etc. RECOMMENDATION The City' s insurance adjustor has reviewed this claim and recom- mends denial at this time. :cw . • MEETI AGENDA DAT Z�i� ITEM 8 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: 4/17/89 TO: City Council VIA: Ray Windsor, City Manager FROM: Mike Hicks, Fire Chief SUBJECT: Resolution No. 23-89 , Weed Abatement Program BACKGROUND City Ordinance No. 61 addresses the abatement of weeds , rubbish, and similar materials which constitute a fire hazard. Adoption of Resolution No. 23-89 is the first step in this annual program which requires Council action. The attached "Exhibit A" contains parcel numbers of those parcels which appeared to require weed • abatement at the time of the first inspections by the Fire Department. Owners of those parcel will receive written notices of the abatement requirements. Also attached is a weed abatement schedule which includes the dates of public hearing, printing of legal notices, etc. , required under Government Code Section 39500 . RECOMMENDATION It is my recommendation Resolution No.' 23-89 , declaring weeds a public nuisance and commencing proceeding for the abatement of said nuisances, be adopted. FISCAL IMPACT Costs involved in administering this program are recovered through the administrative fee charged to parcels abated by the City contractor. • MIKE HICKS FIRE CHIEF MH:pg RESOLUTION NO. 23-89 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO DECLARING WEEDS A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND COMMENCING PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ABATEMENT OF SAID NUISANCES The City Council of the City of Atascadero, County of San Luis Obispo, State of California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE as follows : SECTION 1 . That weeds growing or potentially could grow, and rubbish, refuse and dirt upon public and private property hereinafter described, constitute or could constitute a public nuisance and are hereby declared to be such, for the reason that such weeds upon maturity will bear wingy or downy seeds, will attain such a large growth as to become a fire menace when dry, will be otherwise noxious or dangerous, or will constitute or potentially could constitute dry grass, stubble, brush, litter or other flammable material thereby creating a hazard to public health. SECTION 2 . The description of the parcels of lots of private • property upon which, or in front of which, said nuisances exist, according to the official Assessment Map of said City of Atascadero, are set in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and hereby incorporated herein by reference as though here fully set forth. SECTION 3. The City Clerk is hereby ordered and directed to mail written notice of the proposed abatement to all persons owning property described in this resolution in accordance with Section 6-13 .04 of City Ordinance No. 61 . SECTION 4 . The time at which the City Council shall hear and consider all objections or protests to the required removal of said noxious or dangerous weeds, or other flammable material will be at 7 :00 p.m. on May 23 , 1989 . On Motion by , and seconded by , the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: • ADOPTED: Resolution 23-89 Page 2 ATTEST: City of Atascadero BOYD C. SHARITZ, City Clerk BONITA BORGESON, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: JEFFREY G. JORGENSEN City Attorney APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: MICHAEL HICKS Fire Chief WEED ABATEMENT SCHEDULE 1989 April 3-17 Identify parcels April 5 , 7 , 12 , 14 Legal notices printed in newspaper regarding contractor' s bids . April 25 Resolution declaring weeds, etc. , a public nuisance. April 27 - May 9 Mail notices to property owners. May 1 , 3 :00 p.m. Open contractor' s bids. May 10 Legal notice in newspaper regarding public hearing. May 23 Public hearing regarding appeals and awarding of contractor' s bids. May 24 Start reinspection of lots for compliance. June 5 Begin abatement process. July 12 Legal notice in newspaper regarding abatement costs . July 17 End abatement. July 18 Post parcel numbers and charges at City Hall and Fire Station. July 25 Public hearing regarding appeals on abatement and Council approval of list of parcel numbers and charges for abatement. On or before August 10 Submit parcel numbers and charges to County Tax Assessor. • Page 1 APN Street APN Street 28-011-01 Sycamore 28-021~-02 Sycamore 28-021-10 Sycamore 28-021-15 Sycamore 28-032-19 Hidalgo 29-031-08 Sycamore 28-032-42 Sycamore 28-032-20 Hidalgo 28-032-46 Sycamore 28-032-3S Sycamore 28-041-OS Sycamore 28-042-03 Hidalgo 28-042-04 Hidalgo 28-042-05 Hidalgo 28-042-06 Hidalgo 28-042-08 Hidalgo 28-042-09 Hidalgo 28-042-42 Buena 28-042-22 Escalon 28-042-49 Miramon 28-OSI-30 Arizona 28-051-51 Arizona 28-051-3S Arizona 28-051-43 Arizona 28-051-36 Seperado 28-051-38 Seperado 28-051-45 Seperado 28-051-44 Seperado 28-051-49 Arizona 28-051-50 Arizona 28-052-09 Arizona 28-052-13 Estrada 28-052-31 Arizona 28-052-37 Arizona 28-052-32 Estrada 28-051-18 Estrada 28-061-02 Seperado 28-061-41 Seperado • 28-061-36 Arizona 28-061-31 Arizona 28-062-06 Arizona 28-062-25 Arizona 28-062-11 Estrada 28-062-31 Estrada 28-062-21 Arizona 28-061-13 Arizona 28-071-02 Traffic Way 28-071-33 Traffic Way 28-071-12 Viscano 28-081-05 Miramon 28-071-27 Traffic Way 28-071-06 Traffic Way 28-071-34 Viscano 28-071-29 Viscano 28-071-39 Visoano 28-071-40 Viscano 28-072-01 Traffic Way 28-071-01 Traffic Way 28-073-01 Traffic Way 28-072-02 Seperado 28-081-03 Miramon 28-082-01 Traffic Way 28-082-02 Traffic Way 28-082-07 Traffic Way 28-082-13 Traffic Way 28-082-12 Traffic Way 28-084-02 Traffic Way 28-091-03 Sycamore 28-091-04 Sycamore 28-091-05 Hidalgo 28-092-01 Sycamore 28-092-04 Sycamore 28-092-12 Sycamore 28-093-34 Sycamore 28-093-12 Miramon 28-093-13 Miramon 28-093-35 Sycamore 28-093-40 Sycamore 28-101-01 Miramon 28-101-02 Miramon 28-101-03 Miramon 28-102-01 Traffic Way 28-103-11 Traffic Way 28-103-09 Traffic Way 28-103-13 Alamo 28-151-01 San Jacinto 28-103-14 Traffic Way 28-103-12 Traffic Way • 28-111-02 Sycamore 28-112-01 Sycamore 28-121-01 Sycamore 28-131-30 Sycamore 28-131-18 Sycamore 28-132-01 Sycamore 28-131-31 Sycamore 28-131-35 Sycamore 28-132-25 Sycamore 28-132-23 Sycamore 28-141-01 Estrada 28-141-02 Estrada Pa2 APN Street A_PN Street ._...... _._.._.._.__......_... 28-141-20 Yerba 28-141-21 Yerba 28-141-24 San Anselmo 28-151-26 Yerba 28-141-33 Estrada 28-141-11 Estrada 28-151-28 Mananita 28-151-27 Dolores 28-151-46 Estrada 28-151-54 Mananita 28-152-40 Dolores 28-211-06 Ensenada 28-161-03 San Jacinto 28-161-06 San Jacinto 28-161-07 San Jacinto 28-161-14 San Jacinto 28-161-10 San Vicente 28-161-11 San Vicente 28-161-15 San Jacinto 28-161-22 San Jacinto 28-161-23 San Vicente 28-161-24 San Vicente 28-161-26 San Jacinto 28-161-27 San Jacinto 28-161-29 San Vicente 28-161-30 San Vicente 28-161-31 San Vicente 28-162-03 San Vicente 28-162-04 San Vicente 28-162-05 San Vicente 28-162-06 San Vicente 28-162-07 San Vicente 28-162-08 San Vicente 28-162-23 Dolores 28-162-14 Viscano 28-162-15 Viscano 28-162-16 Viscano 28-162-26 Viscano 28-162-21 Viscano 28-171-08 Viscano 28-162-37 San Vicente 28-162-38 San Vicente 28-171-06 Dolores 28-171-07 Dolores 28-171-09 Viscano 28-171-02 Viscano • 28-172-01 Dolores 28-172-26 Alamo 28-172-15 Valentina 28-181-25 Valentina 28-172-24 Alamo 28-172-13 Valentina 28-172-32 Alamo 28-172-22 Alamo 28-181-03 Valentina 28-181-02 Dolores 28-181-08 Valentina 28-181-27 Valentina 28-181-14 San Pedro 28-181-17 San Pedro 28-181-26 Valentina 28-181-09 Valentina 28-181-29 Valentina 28-181-30 Valentina 28-182-05 San Pedro 28-182-28 San Pedro 28-182-17 Alamo 28-182-10 Arroyo 28-182-19 San Pedro 28-182-09 San Pedro 28-182-22 San Pedro 28-182-23 San Pedro 28-182-26 Alamo 28-182-25 Alamo 28-191-01 Traffic Way 28-191-09 Traffic Way 28-191-10 Traffic Way 28-191-08 Traffic Way 28-192-01 Traffic Way 28-192-50 Traffic Way 28-192-05 Traffic Way 28-192-06 Traffic Way 28-192-07 Traffic Way 28-192-44 Traffic Way 28-192-15 Traffic Way 28-192-42 Traffic Way 28-192-19 Rosario 28-192-01 Rosario 28-192-24 Barrenda 28-192-46 Alamo 28-192-32 Alamo 28-192-21 Rosario 28-192-35 Traffic Way 28-192-14 Traffic Way 28-192-43 Honda 28-192-40 Honda 28-192-47 Barrenda 28-192-51 Barrenda . 28-201-04 Via 28-201-01 Via .. .. .............. gage 3 APN StreetIPN street. 28-212-01 Capistrano 28-213-22 Mercedes 28-214-02 Magdalena 28-214-17 Mercedes 28-215-14 Mercedes 28-215-16 Mercedes 28-215-17 Mercedes 28-242-05 Curbaril 28-241-07 Curbaril 28-241-02 Cortez 28-242-06 Curbaril 28-242-07 Curbaril 28-242-08 Curbaril 28-352-05 Capistrano 28--251-01 Arena 28-251-14 San Anselmo 28-251-08 Dolores 28-251-09 Dolores 28-251-09 Dolores 28-251-07 San Ardo 28-251-19 San Anselmo 28-261-31 Dolores 28-2S1-21 San Anselmo 28-251-18 San Anselrno 28-2S1-24 San Ardo 28-251-23 Arena 28-251-29 San Ardo 28-251-30 San Ardo 28-251-31 San Ardo 28-251-25 San Ardo 28-261-09 San Ardo 28-261-08 San Ardo 28-261-19 San Ardo 28-261-20 Arena 28-261-22 San Ardo 28-261-10 San Ardo 28-261-23 Dolores 28-261-16 Dolores 28-261-28 Yerba 28-261-25 Yerba 28-261-32 Yerba 28-271-29 Dolores 28-261-33 Arena 28-261-27 Yerba 28-271-06 Dolores 28-271-15 Dolores 28-271-06 San Anselmo 28-271-26 San Anselmo 28-271-07 Dolores 28-271-18 Dolores 28-271-14 Dolores 28-271-13 Dolores 28-271-24 San Anselmo 28-281-01 Curvado 28-281-02 Curvado 28-281-15 Curvado 28-281-04 Curvado 28-281-05 Curvado 28-281-11 Navidad 28-331-12 Barrenda 28-281-13 Dolores 28-282-07 Dolores 28-282-02 El Verano 28-282-27 El Verano 28-282-04 El Verano 28-282-21 El Verano 28-282-08 Dolores 28-282-15 Dolores 28-282-13 El Verano 28-282-12 El Verano 28-282-24 El Verano 28-282-25 El Verano 28-283-05 Mercedes 28-382-06 Mercedes 28-291-01 Dolores 28-291-02 Dolores 28-291-03 Dolores 28-291-04 Dolores 28-291-07 Curvado 28-291-06 Curvado 28-291-10 Curvado 28-292-01 Curvado 28-292-09 Navidad 28-292--13 Navidad 28-292-15 Dolores 28-292-14 Dolores 28-292-16 Curvado 28-292-06 Curvado 28-292-17 Navidad 28-301-32 Dulzura 28-292-18 Dolores 28-292-05 Dolores 28-292-19 San Jacinto 28-292-10 San Jacinto 28-301-07 Dulzura 28-301-08 Dulzura • 28-301-13 San Jacinto 28-301-12 San Jacinto 28-301-18 San Jacinto 28-301-16 San Jacinto 28-301-22 San Jacinto 28-311-42 Gancho • RagP4 ARN Street APN Street ...._........_ ..._...... ............. _.._ 28-301-31 Dulzura 28-301-33 Dulzura 28-301-36 San Jacinto 28-301-38 San Jacinto 28-311-04 Gancho 28-311-05 Gancho 28-311-09 Rosario 28-311-36 Rosario 28-311-13 Dulzura 28-311-29 Dulzura 28-311-15 Dulzura 28-311-26 Dulzura 28-311-19 Bajada 28-311-18 Dulzura 28-311-28 Dulzura 28-321-24 Gancho 28-311-31 Gancho 28-311-33 Gancho 28-311-32 Gancho 28-311-08 Rosario 28-311-35 Dulzura 28-311-34 Dulzura 28-311-37 Rosario 28-311-38 Rosario 28-311-39 Rosario 28-311-40 Bajada 28-311-41 Gancho 28-311-03 Gancho 28-321-04 Gancho 28-321-34 Arroyo 28-321-10 Rosario 28-321-32 Rosario 28-321-17 Arroyo 28-321-18 Arroyo 28-321-23 Rosario 28-321-25 Rosario 28-321-29 Rosario 28-321-11 Rosario 28-321-35 Arroyo 28-321-15 Arroyo 28-331-03 Rosario 28-331-04 Rosario 28-331-05 Rosario 28-332-01 Barrenda 28-331-09 Barrenda 28-332-29 Barrenda 28-332-02 Barrenda 28-332-04 Barrenda 28-332-21 Alamo 28-341-11 Ensenada 28-332-25 Honda 28-332-19 Honda 28-332-27 Barrenda 28-332-09 Barrenda 28-332-30 Juarez 28-332-10 Alamo 28-332-31 Honda 28-332-17 Honda 28-332-35 Alamo 28-332-20 Alamo 28-341-11 Ensenada 28-361-28 Ensenada 28-341-21 Via 28-341-24 Traffic Way 28-351-04 Ensenada 28-351-05 Ensenada 28-351-21 Mercedes 28-382-14 Mercedes 28-354-09 Mercedes 28-355-13 Mercedes 28-355-14 Mercedes 28-355-10 Mercedes 28-361-02 Traffic Way 28-371-25 Capistrano 28-361-09 Ensenada 28-361-14 Ensenada 28-361-27 Ensenada 2S-361-08 Ensenada 28-371-18 Capistrano 28-371-09 Capistrano 28-371-21 Capistrano 2S-371-04 Ensenada 28-371-30 Ensenada 28-372-03 Capistrano 28-372-10 Magnolia 28-391-01 Dolores 28-372-14 Magnolia 28-372-13 Magnolia 28-372-24 Cabrillo 28-372-15 Magnolia 28-372-29 Magnolia 28-372-11 Magnolia 28-381-01 Magnolia 28-381-25 Magnolia • 28-381-13 Mercedes 28-382-12 Mercedes 28-381-24 Magnolia 28-381-23 Magnolia 28-391-06 Dolores 28-281-10 E1 Verano _ Sage 5 APN Stree . 28-401-03 Vernalis 28-401-09 Vernalis 28-401-11 Amargon 28-401-22 Amargon 28-401-15 Amargon 28-401-16 Aurora 28-401-19 Aurora 28-411-13 Curbaril 28-411-07 Garbada 28-411-04 Vernalis 28-411-09 Garbada 28-411-08 Garbada 28-411-21 Garbada 28-412-07 Tampico 28-412-09 Aurora 28-412-08 Aurora 28-413-01 Aurora 28-103-08 Alamo 29-011-07 Nogales 29-011-17 Nogales 29-011-41 Nogales 29-012-02 S. Anselmo 29-012-03 S. Anselmo 29-012-15 Rosita 29-012-21 Rosita 29-012-20 Rosita 29-022-19 Rosita 29-022-26 Rosita 29-022-21 Rosita 29-023-10 Rosita 29-024-17 Rosita 29-024-19 Rosita 29-024-18 Rosita 29-024-14 Rosita 29-024-20 Nogales 29-031-10 El Verano 29-031-06 Nogales 29-031-05 El Verano 29-031-08 El Verano 29-031-07 El Verano 29-032-09 El Verano 29-032-13 El Verano 29-041-08 Vida 29-041-10 S. Jacinto 29-041-12 S. Jacinto 29-042-08 Vida • 29-041-13 Vida 29-041-24 S. Jacinto 29-041-15 S. Jacinto 29-041-16 S. Jacinto 29-041-23 S. Jacinto 29-041-06 Vida 29-042-03 Vida 29-042-06 Vida 29-042-07 Vida 29-051-23 Dulzura 29-042-09 El Verano 29-042-04 El Verano 29-042-18 Miramon 28-042-14 Miramon 29-051-17 S. Jacinto 29-061-31 Honda 29-051-29 S. Jacinto 29-051-30 S. Jacinto 29-061-02 Honda 29-061-03 Honda 29-061-16 Traffic Wy 29-061-15 Traffic Wy 29-061-18 Honda 29-061-54 Honda 29-061-23 Barrenda 29-051-13 Barrenda 29-061-29 Barrenda 29-062-01 Barrenda 29-061-33 Barrenda 29-061-34 Barrenda 29-061-38 Honda 29-061-37 Honda 29-061-42 Traffic Wy 29-061-45 Traffic Wy 29-061-44 Honda 29-061-43 Honda 29-062-02 Barrenda 29-062-31 Barrenda 29-062-09 Barrenda 29-062-10 Barrenda 29-062-12 Traffic Wy 29-062-13 Traffic Wy 29-062-14 Traffic Wy 29-062-18 Bajada 29-062-17 Bajada 29-062-37 Bajada 29-062-25 Barrenda 29-062-20 Barrenda 29-062-28 Barrenda 29-062-38 Barrenda 29-071-03 Fresno 29-081-13 Rosario 29-071-04 Nogales 29-071-05 Nogales 29-071-09 Nogales 29-071-10 Dulzura HP N Street P NStreet_ Pag . . . .. .......I......._....... � 29-071-16 Rosario 29-071-15 Rosario 29-071--22 Fresno 29-071-21 Fresno 29-071-23 Nogales 29-071-30 Nogales 29-071-34 Rosario 29-071-24 Rosario 29-071-39 Rosario 29-071-33 Rosario 29-081-02 Rosario 29-081-09 Rosario 29-081-06 Rosario 29-081-07 Rosario 29-081-11 Rosario 29-081-05 Rosario 29-081-16 Rosario 29-081-12 Bajada 29-082-02 Bajada 29-082-22 Bajada 29-082-08 Traffic Wy 29-091-31 Traffic Wy 29-082-32 Tunitas 29-082-13 Tunitas 29-082-39 Tunitas 29-082-11 Tunitas 29-101-05 Country Club 29-101-16 Country Club 29-101-11 Magnolia 29-101-12 Magnolia 29-101-15 Country Club 29-101-65 Capistrano 29-101-20 Country Club 29-101-06 Country Club 29-105-04 Valle 29-106-04 Capistrano 29-105-14 Capistrano 29-105-31 Mercedes 29-105-23 Mercedes 29-105-28 Mercedes 29-105-27 Mercedes 29-105-37 Serena 29-105-32 Mercedes 29-105-35 Mercedes 29-105-33 Capistrano 29-105-34 Capistrano 29-105-38 Serena 29-105-07 Serena 29-106-05 Capistrano 29-111-05 Pinal 29-111-03 Pinal 29-111-04 Pinal 29-111-06 Pinal 29-111-02 Pinal 29-121-01 Pinal 29-141-10 Pinal 29-121-05 Maleza 29-121-20 Maleza 29-121-07 Maleza 29-121-06 Maleza 29-121-09 Maleza 29-121-08 Maleza 29-121-15 Maleza 29-121-18 Maleza 29-121-17 Maleza 29-121-21 Maleza 29-121-19 Maleza 29-121-02 Pinal 29-121-22 Maleza 29-121-10 Maleza 29-131-02 Maleza 29-131-19 Pinal 29-131-20 Pinal 29-131-22 Pinal 29-131-21 Pinal 29-131-12 Pinal 29-131-23 Maleza 29-131-26 Maleza 29-131-27 Castano 29-131-28 Castano 29-131-28 Castano 29-131-29 Maleza 29-131-30 Maleza 29-131-25 Maleza 29-132-02 Castano 29-132-04 Castano 29-132-10 Cortez 29-132-12 Castano 29-132-13 Cortez 29-132-17 Castano 29-132-18 Castano 29-141-04 Castano 29-141-08 Castano 29-141-05 Pinal 29-141-03 Pinal 29-141-07 Castano 29-141-06 Castano 29-141-14 Curbaril 29-141-18 Castano 29-141-15 Castano 29-141-09 Castano Page 7 APRT ... . .Street . PN _tr_... ......._....._.......__.._ 29-141-17 Curbaril 29-141-13 Curbaril 29-141-21 Pinal 29-141-22 Curbaril 29-141-23 Pinal 29-141-12 Pinal 29-142-05 Castano 29-142-04 Castano 29-142-11 Cortez 29-142-10 Cortez 29-142-19 Castano 29-142-15 Castano 29-142-26 Castano 29-142-25 Castano 29-142-27 Castano 29-142-28 Castano 29-142-30 Cortez 29-142-29 Cortez 29-151-01 Curbaril 29-151-02 Curbaril 29-151-03 Curbaril 29-151-04 Valle 29-151-05 Valle 29-151-25 Valle 29-151-22 Valle 29-151-20 Valle 29-151-23 Yesal 29-152-25 Curbaril 29-152-04 Curbaril 29-152-21 Yesal 29-152-13 Castano 29-152-10 Castano 29-152-17 Yesal 29-152-17 Yesal 29-152-18 Yesal 29-152-23 Castano 29-152-22 Castano 29-152-24 Castano 29-153-09 Cortez 29-153-33 Cortez 29-153-17 Castano 29-153-04 Castano 29-153-32 Castano 29-153-28 Cortez 29-161-08 Pinal 29-161-04 Sonora 29-161-09 Sonora 29-171-01 Sonora 29-171-06 Sonora 29-171-17 Valle 29-171-08 Valle 29-171-07 Valle 29-171-10 Valle 29-171-09 Valle 29-171-12 Valle 29-171-11 Valle 29-171-15 Valle 29-171-14 Valle 29-171-18 Valle 29-171-13 Valle 29-171-21 Sonora 29-171-20 Sonora 29-181-05 Pinal 29-181-40 Pinal 29-181-07 Pinal 29-171-06 Pinal 29-181-08 Cortina 29-181-09 Cortina 29-181-22 Sonora 29-181-49 Sonora 29-181-27 Valle 29-191-32 Cortina 29-181-29 Valle 29-181-28 Valle 29-181-39 Cortina 29-181-38 Cortina 29-181-44 Cortina 29-181-35 Cortina 29-181-45 Sonora 29-181-21 Sonora 29-191-08 Pinal 29-191-35 Pinal 29-191-24 Valle 29-191-49 Valle 29-191-29 Cortina 29-191-26 Cortina 29-191-34 Pinal 29-191-46 Pinal 29-191-38 Cortina 29-191-17 Cortina 29-191-48 Valle 29-191-09 Pinal 29-201-04 Palomar 29-201-16 Castano 29-201-07 Palomar 29-201-26 Palomar 29-201-10 Castano 29-202-17 Castano 29-202-01 Castano 29-211-27 Rosita 29-202-10 Castano 29-202-03 Castano PageAPN Street APN Street_ 29--202--12 Cayuco s 29-222-22 Lobos 29-202-16 Castano 29-202-05 Castano 29-211-19 Lobos 29-211-20 Lobos 29-211-32 Rosita 29-211-07 Rosita 29-212-02 Lobos 29-212-06 Lobos 29-222-06 Hermosilla 29-222-20 Lobos Lane 29-222-18 Encima 29-222-37 Encima 29-222-21 Lobos Lane 29-222-19 Encima 29-222-25 Lobos 29--222-31 Hermosilla 29-231-06 S. Jacinto 29-233-17 Nogales 29-231-13 Nogales 29-231-14 Nogales 29-231-16 Lobos Lane 29-231-15 Lobos Lane 29-232-01 Vida 29-241-38 S . Jacinto 29-233-04 S. Jacinto 29-233-05 S. Jacinto 29-233-20 Vida 29-233-18 Vida 29-233-24 Vida 29-233-23 Vida 29-233-25 Nogales 29-233-07 S. Jacinto 29-241-02 Nogales 29-241-25 Nogales 29-241-24 Nogales 29-241-34 Nogales 29-241-35 Nogales 29-251-04 Rosario 29-252-01 Rosario 29-252-26 Rosario 29-252-07 Olmeda 29-252-25 Olmeda 29-253-04 Rosario 29-253-16 Olmeda 29-253-08 Traffic Wy 29-253-14 Tunitas 29-253-15 Tunitas 29-253-05 Tunitas 29-254-04 Tunitas 29-25403 Tunitas 29-254-09 Tunitas 29-254-05 Tunitas 29-254-13 Tunitas 29-254-14 Tunitas 29-254-16 Tunitas 29-255-12 Traffic Wy 29-256-33 Traffic Wy 29-261-19 Valdez 29-261-01 Cayucos 29-261-20 Valdez 29-262-24 Valdez 29-271-13 S. Jacinto 29-272-03 Hermosilla 29-281-06 Olmeda 29-272-17 S. Jacinto 29-272-16 Lobos Lane 29-281-30 Fresno 29-281-13 S. Jacinto 29-281-41 Olmeda 29-281-38 Fresno 29-281-43 Mariquita 29-281-44 Mariquita 29-281-49 Fresno 29-281-49 Fresno 29-291-03 Fresno 29-291-30 Fresno 29-291-07 Mariquita 29-291-11 Rosario 29-291-23 Mariquita 29-291-28 Mariquita 29-291-29 Fresno 29-292-14 Olmeda 29-291-31 Rosario 29-291-18 Rosario 29-291-32 Mariquita 29-291-33 Mariquita 29-292-03 Olmeda 29-292-23 Olmeda 29-292-06 Mariquita 29-262-06 Mariquita 29-292-13 Olmeda 29-292-04 Olmeda 29-292-19 Olmeda 29-292-18 Olmeda 29-292-22 Olmeda 29-292-20 Olmeda 29-292-24 Mariquita 29-292-30 Mariquita 29-292-29 Rosario 29-301-39 S. Jacinto • Page 9 Pfd Street 1Phl Street Page _.._..... ._.._......._........_._...... 29-301-10 Olmeda 29-301-18 Palma 29-302-50 Palma 29-302-28 Palma 29-312-28 Palma 29-321-14 Rosario 29-321-17 Rosario 29-322-09 Traffic Wy 29-322-06 Ridgeway Ct 29-322-19 Ridgeway Ct 29-322-12 Traffic Wy 29-322-15 Rosario 29-322-20 Ridgeway Ct 29-322-01 Rosario 29-323-21 El Camino R1 29-351-01 Valle 29-352-01 Valle 29-353-03 Valle 29-353-04 Valle 29-353-01 Escarpa 29-361-13 Valle 29-371-20 Valle 29-361-19 S. Ysabel 29-361-14 Capistrano 29-361-20 Capitrano 29-361-18 El Camino Rl 29-°371-10 8ombrilla 29-371-28 8ombrilla 29-371-14 Valle 29-371-21 8ombrilla 29-371-16 8ombrilla 29-371-17 8ombrilla 29-371-22 Valle 29-371-18 Valle 29-371-27 8ombrilla 29-371-19 8ombrilla 29-371-30 Valle 29-371-28 Valle 29-371-31 Valle 29-271-32 Valle 29-381-01 Valle 29-382-01 Valle 29-381-19 Valle 29-382-05 Encinal 29-382-03 Valle 29-381-04 Valle ® 29-382-05 Valle 29-382-11 Valle 29-382-07 Encinal 29-382-08 Encinal 29-382-20 Valle 29-382-18 Valle 29-382-21 Valle 29-382-27 Valle 29-382-23 Valle 29-382-22 Valle 29-382-29 Encinal 29-391-58 Encinal 29-382-31 Encinal 29-378-30 Encinal 30-041-28 Curbaril 30-041-20 Curbaril 30-041-30 Curbaril 30-041-29 Curbaril 30-041-38 Curbaril 30-041-38 Curbaril 30-041-41 El Camino Rl 30-041-54 Curbaril 30-051-03 Valle 30-051-04 Valle 30-051-19 Valle 30-051-20 Valle 30-051-21 Junipero 30-051-18 Junipero 30-051-23 Junipero 30-071-35 Junipero 30-051-25 Palomar 30-051-20 Palomar 30-051-27 Valle 30-051-35 Valle 30-051-28 Palomar 30-051-27 Palomar 30-051-31 Valle 30-051-32 Valle 30-051-36 Valle 30-051-37 Valle 30-061-11 Curbaril 30-061-46 Curbaril 30-061-27 Curbaril 30-051-30 Valle 30-061-49 Curbaril 30-061-28 Curbaril 30-061-53 Curbaril 30-061-32 Curbaril 30-071-01 Junipero 30-071-25 Junipero • 30-071-16 Palomar 30-071-36 Palomar 30-071-29 Junipero 30-071-12 Junipero 30-071-32 Junipero 30-071-06 Junipero Page 10 APN_ Street_ APN Street • 30-071-34 Palomar 30-071-30 Palomar 30-071-37 Palomar 30-071-17 Palomar- 30-111-02 Junipero 30-151-07 Junipero 30-111-16 Palomar 30-111-15 Palomar 30-111-25 Palomar 30-111-24 Palomar 30-111-29 Palomar 30-111-39 Palomar 30-111-34 Palomar 30-iii-35 Palomar 30-111-37 Palomar 30-111-23 Palomar 30-111-38 Palomar 30-483-01 Las Lomas 30-141-04 Junipero 30-141-52 Junipero 30-141-14 Junipero 30-141-19 Junipero 30-141-17 Junipero 30-141-73 Junipero 30-141-20 Junipero 30-141-38 Junipero 30-141-74 Junipero 30-141-18 Junipero 30-151-05 Junipero 30-151-04 Junipero 30-152-07 Palomar 30-151-15 El Camino R1 30-242-06 Viejo Camino 30-342-07 Viejo Camino 30-311-02 Salinas 30-311-03 Salinas 30-342-08 Viejo Camino 30-342-09 Viejo Camino 30-342-10 Viejo Camino 30-342-11 Viejo Camino 30-381-02 Palomar 30-381-01 Palomar 30-381-06 Palomar 30-381-04 Palomar 30-391-02 E1 Corte 30-391-03 El Corte 30-401-01 E1 Corte 30-401-05 El Corte 30-401-02 La Linia 30-421-05 E1 Corte 30-401-04 Halcon 30-311-01 Salinas 30-401-04 La Linia 30-401-03 La Linia 30-401-10 Halcon 30-401-14 Halcon 30-401-12 Halcon 30-401-09 Halcon 30-401-13 Halcon 30-401-03 Halcon 30-401-16 Halcon 30-401-11 Halcon 30-411-01 Arcade 30-391-01 El Corte 30-412-21 E1 Dorado 30-412-22 Santa Fe 30-412-23 Santa Fe 30-412-25 Santa Fe 30-412-24 Santa Fe 30-412-05 E1 Dorado 30-421-01 E1 Dorado 30-413-05 El Dorado 30-422-02 Pino Solo 30-421-03 La Linia 30-422-09 E1 Bordo 30-442-01 E1 Bordo 30-422-11 La Linia 30-422-10 Pino Solo 30-431-09 Pino Solo 30-492-04 Pino Solo 30-442-10 El Bordo 30-442-11 E1 Bordo 30-461-16 E1 Camino Rl 30-461-17 E1 Camino Rl 30-461-26 Musselman 30-401-15 Halcon 30-471-01 E1 Bordo 30-442-08 E1 Bordo 30-471-03 E1 Bordo 30-471-02 E1 Bordo 30-471-07 Las Lomas 30-471-05 Las Lomas 30-471-08 Las Lomas 30-471-06 Las Lomas 30-483-02 Las Lomas 30-483-03 Las Lomas 30-483-04 Las Lomas 30-483-05 Las Lomas 30-492-02 E1 Camino R1 30-381-05 Palomar 30-512-03 Cascada 30-512-02 Cascada 0 • • Page 11 APN Street WP.IV _t_r_ee.. .................. 30-512-08 Cascada 30-522-23 Cascada 30-512-08 Arcade 30-511-01 Arcade 30--513-04 El Centro 30-501-03 Solano 30-513-12 Solano 30-513-03 Solano 30-521-11 Arcade 30-521-01 Arcade 30-522-01 El Dorado 30-352-02 La Linia 30-522-08 E1 Dorado 30-522-02 El Dorado 31-012-07 Violeta Ave 31-012--09 Corta Ave 31-012-10 Corta Ave 31-012-11 Corta Ave 31-012-17 Aguila Ave 31-012-16 Aguila Ave 31-012-19 Corta Ave 31-012-23 Chauplin Ave 31-012-22 Chauplin Ave 31-012-24 Chauplin Ave 31-012-25 Chauplin Ave 31-013-27 Chauplin Ave 31-013-05 Aguila Ave 31-021-01 Chauplin Ave 31-013-28 Chauplin Ave 31-013-29 Chauplin Ave 31-021-06 Santa Lucia 31-021-05 Corta Ave 31-021-20 Aguila Ave 31-012-04 Aguila Ave 31-023-05 Corta Ave 31-023-06 Corta Ave 31-023-11 Santa Lucia 31-023-12 Santa Lucia 31-023-15 Santa Lucia 31-023-10 Santa Lucia 31-023-18 Santa Lucia - 31-023-17 Santa Lucia 31-023-24 Santa Lucia 31-023-25 Santa Lucia 31-041-16 San Marcos 31-043-06 Navajoa • 31-042-15 Santa Ynez 31-052-28 Atascadero Ave 31-051-38 Morro Rd 31-051-49 Morro Rd 31-051-39 Morro Rd 31-051-43 Morro Rd 31-051-59 Navajoa 31-062-09 Atascadero Ave 31-052-11 Atascadero Ave 31-051-51 Morro Rd 31-052-21 Atascadero Ave 31-052-23 Atascadero Ave 31-061-13 Tecorida 31-061-37 Tecorida 31-061-38 Cristobal 31-071-30 Marchant 31-062-06 Atascadero Ave 31-062-18 Atascadero Ave 31-062-11 Tecorida 31-062-15 Tecorida 31-071-25 Cristobal 31-071-17 Cristobal 31-071-31 Marchant 31-071-29 Marchant 31-081-07 Curbaril 31-081-10 Coromar 31-081-16 Coromar 31-081-19 Marchant Ave 31-082-25 Constancia 31-082-13 Constancia 31-082-30 Coromar 31-082-20 Marchant 31-082-32 Coromar 31-082-31 Coromar 31-091-05 Encino Ave 31-091-04 Encino Ave 31-091-07 Chauplin 31-092-05 Encino 31-091-08 Encino Ave 31-091-06 Encino Ave 31-091-10 Encino Ave 31-091-09 Chauplin Ave 31-091-13 Encino Ave 31-091-05 Encino Ave 31-091-15 Encino Ave 31-091-11 Encino Ave 31-091-17 Atajo Ave 31-091-18 Atajo Ave 31-091-19 Atajo Ave 31-091-01 Chauplin 31-101-01 Chauplin 31-101-11 Chauplin 31-101-02 Encino 31-102-01 Encino 31-101-04 Encino 31-101-03 Encino w 0 Mage 12 _ _ ,APNStreet A.P.N.�PNStreet_ 31_- .101-06 Encino 31-101-13 Encino 31-101-12 Encino 31-101-08 Encino 31-102-02 Encino 31-102-13 Encino 31-102-15 Encino 31--102-16 Encino 31-103-01 Navarette 31-104-01 Santa Lucia 31-104-03 Navarette 31-104-22 Navarette 31-104-08 Navarette 31-104-10 Navarette 31-104-09 Navarette 31-111-01 Navarette 31-104-19 Navarette 31-104-14 Navarette 31-104-21 Navarette 31-104-20 Navarette 31-111-02 Mira Flores 31-111-04 Mira Flores 31-111-09 El Retiro 31-111-11 El Retiro 31-112-01 Navarette 31-112-02 Alta Vista 31-112-04 Alta Vista 31-112-05 Alta Vista 31-112-06 Alta Vista 31-112-07 Alta Vista 31-112-09 Alta Vista 31-112-10 Alta Vista 31-112-12 Alta Vista 31-112-11 Alta Vista 31-112-13 Alta Vista 31-112-14 Alta Vista 31-113-01 Alta Vista 31-113-02 Alta Vista 31-113-02 Navarette 31-114-05 Alta Vista 31-113-03 Alta Vista 31-113-10 Alta Vista 31-113-06 Alta Vista 31-114-01 Navarette 31-113-08 Alta Vista 31-113-07 Alta Vista 31-113-11 Alta Vista 31-113-12 Alta Vista 31-115-01 Alta Vista 31-115-02 Alta Vista 31-115-03 Alta Vista 31-115-06 Linda Vista 31-115-05 Linda Vista 31-121-01 Alta Vista 31-115-07 Linda Vista 31-115-08 Linda Vita 31-121-02 Alta Vista 31-122-08 Navarette 31-122-01 Linda Vista 31-122-05 Los Cerritos 31-122-03 Linda Vista 31-122-02 Linda Vista 31-122-06 Los Cerritos 31-122-07 Los Cerritos 31-122-09 Navarette 31-122-11 Navarette 31-122-12 Navarette 31-122-04 Linda Vista 31-123-01 Los Cerritos 31-123-03 Los Cerritos 31-123-05 Los Cerritos 31-123-06 San Andres 31-123-07 San Andres 31-123-10 San Andres 31-123-09 Navarette 31-123-08 Navarette 31-123-12 Los Cerritos 31-123-11 Los Cerritos 31-124-06 Navarette 31-124-01 Navarette 31-124-08 Navarette 31-124-09 Navarette 31-124-11 Pequenia 31-125-04 Descanso 31-131-01 San Clemente 31-131-02 San Clemente 31-131-04 Larga 31-131-11 Larga 31-131-08 Pequenia 31-131-09 Pequenia 31-131-10 Pequenia 31-132-08 Pequenia 31-131-12 Pequenia 31-131-07 Pequenia 31-132-06 Larga 31-132-04 Larga 31-132-09 Pequenia 31-132-02 Larga 31-133-01 Larga 31-133-02 Larga 31-133-03 Larga 31-133-04 Larga Page 13 APid Street WP.N S_t_ree.:t_ .._......_...... .._......................__..._ 31-133-06 Larga 31-133-12 Larga 31-133-09 Larga 31-134-03 San Clemente 31-133-13 Larga 31-133-14 Larga 31-134-07 E1 Descanso 31-134-08 El Descanso 31-134-09 E1 Descanso 31-191-02 Navarette 31-141-49 San Marcos 31-141-51 San Marcos 31-141-50 San Marcos 31-141-33 San Marcos 31-142-04 Carmelita 31-142-19 Carmelita 31-142-18 Carmelita 31-142-23 Carmelita 31-142-20 Carmelita 31-151-21 Carmelita 31-151-14 Santa Ynez 31-151-33 Santa Ynez 31-151-22 Carmelita 31-151-24 Carmelita 31-152-22 Navajoa 31-153-OS Morro Rd 31-161-21 Morro Rd 31-161-01 Marchant Ave 31-161-24 Curbaril 31-161-36 Atacadero Ave 31-161-35 Atascadero 31-161-34 Morro Rd 31-171-01 Marchant 31-171-23 Atascadero 31-181-06 Santa Ynez 31-183-02 Navajoa 31-183-32 Navajoa 31-183-28 Morro Rd 31-183-34 Morro Rd 31-211-11 Curbaril 31-191-04 Navarette 31-191-06 Linda Vista 31-191-05 Navarette 31-191-03 Navarette 31-192-07 Navarette 31-192-14 Hermosa 31-192-15 Hermosa 31-192-12 Hermosa 31-192-17 Navarette 31-192-16 Navarette 31-192-18 Navarette 31-192-19 Navarette 31-192-20 Hermosa 31-201-02 Hermosa 31-201-03 Hermosa 31-202-28 San Clemente 31-202-04 San Clemente 31-202705 San Clemente 31-202-06 San Marcos 31-202-22 San Marcos 31-202-17 San Marcos 31-202-26 San Marcos 31-202-18 San Marcos 31-211-11 Curbaril 31-202-20 San Clemente 31-202-23 San Clemente 31-202-24 San Clemente 31-202-25 San Clemente 31-202-27 San Marcos 31-202-08 San Marcos 31-211-07 San Marcos 31-211-06 San Marcos 31-211-09 San Marcos 31-211-08 San Marcos 31-211-22 Carmelita 31-221-09 Carmelita 31-222-02 Curbaril 31-222-18 Santa Ynez 31-222-08 Santa Ynez 31-231-02 Curbaril 31-231-03 Curbaril 31-231-24 Morro Rd 31-231-28 Morro Rd 31-241-11 Amapoa 31-241-12 Amapoa 31-241-13 Amapoa 31-241-28 Amapoa 31-241-19 Amapoa 31-242-10 Morro Rd 31-242-14 Morro Rd 31-242-16 Morro Rd 31-242-13 Morro Rd 31-251-01 Atascadero Ave 31-251-08 Atascadero Ave 31-251-11 San Francisco 31-251-47 San Francisco • 31-251-16 San Francisco 31-251-29 Azucena 31-251-28 Azucena 31-251-26 Azucena 31-261-02 San Francisco 31-261-23 San Francisco AP N Street � P.. Street............ Page . . , _ -_ _ 31-261-05 San Francisco 31-261-06 San rancisc Francisco 31-261-28 San Francisco 31-261-11 Marchant 31-271-13 Carmelita 31-281-14 Portola 31-271-26 Carmelita 31-271-27 Carmelita 31-271-42 Carmelita 31-271-43 Carmelita 31-271-47 Carmelita 31-271-23 Carmelita 31-281-22 Carmelita 31-281-05 Piedras Altos 31-291-21 Morro Rd 31-291-26 Portola 31-291-22 Morro Rd 31-291-24 Morro Rd 31-301-29 Azucena 31-301-11 Amapoa 31-302-13 Morro Rd 31-302-34 Morro Rd 31-311-02 Azucena 31-311-06 Azucena 31-311-19 Portola 31-311-17 Marchant 31-311-23 Marchant 31-311-01 Azucena 31-321-01 Portola 31-321-02 Portola 31-321-03 Portola 31-321-1S Portola 31-321-08 Carmelita 31-321-09 Bella Vista 31-321-14 Carmelita 31-321-12 Carmelita 31-321-16 Bella Vista 31-321-17 Bella Vista 31-331-10 Carmelita 31-331-05 Carmelita 31-331-12 Carmelita 31-331-17 Carmelita 31-341-07 Carmelita 31-361-08 Amapoa 31-341-20 Carmelita 31-341-06 Carmelita 31-351-OS Portola 31-3S1-06 Portola 31-361-11 Amapoa 31-361-12 Amapoa 31-361-17 Morro Rd 31-361-05 Morro Rd 31-361-19 Morro Rd 31-361-03 Morro Rd 31-361-20 Morro Rd 31-361-22 Morro Rd 31-361-21 Amapoa 31-3S1-1S Amapoa 31-371-10 Morro Rd 31-371-11 Morro Rd 31-371-12 Morro Rd 31-373-11 Santa Rosa 31-381-09 Marchant Way 31-171-01 Marchant 31-381-27 Avenal 31-381-31 Santa Rosa 31-381-47 Santa Rosa 31-381-60 Marchant Way 31-381-55 Santa Rosa 31-381-52 Santa Rosa 38-181-15 San Pedro 28-182-02 San Pedro 45-301-03 Ortega 45-302-OS Ortega 4S-321-03 E1 Camino Rl 45-3S2-01 San Diego 45-321-09 Viejo Camino 45-321-02 E1 Camino Rl 45-331-02 Santa Barbara 45-331-01 Santa Barbara 45-331-04 E1 Camino Rl 45-321-10 Viejo Camino 45-332-03 Viejo Camino 45-332-04 Viejo Camino 45-332-05 Viejo Camino 45-331-03 El Camino R1 45-332-10 Viejo Camino 45-332-09 Viejo Camino 45-341-02 San Diego Rd 45-341-04 San Diego Rd 45-351-02 El Camino R1 45-351-14 El Camino Rl 45-351-03 El Camino Rl 45-351-01 E1 Camino R1 45-351-07 E1 Camino Rl 45-352-04 San Diego 45-352-05 San Diego 45-361-13 Cuesta Ct 45-353-05 San Diego Rd 45-341-01 San Diego Rd 45-361-13 Cuesta Ct 45-361-15 Cuesta Ct WPNStreet W PNStreet Page 15 _ _ _ _ _ .. _ . 45-361-15 Cuesa Ct 45-361-16 Cuesta Ct 45--361-16 Cuesta Ct 45-361-26 Ban Rafael Ct 45-361-26 Ban Rafael Ct 45-361-27 San Rafael Ct 45-361-27 San Rafael Ct 45-361-28 Ban Rafael Ct 45-361-28 San Rafael Ct 45-353-01 San Rafael Ct 45-371-01 Atascadero Rd 45-371-02 Atascadero Rd 45-371-05 Atascadero Rd 45-371-09 Banta Barbara 45-371-10 Banta Barbara 45-371-11 Santa Barbara 45-371-12 Santa Barbara 45-371-13 Santa Barbara 45-381-01 La Paz 45-381-03 La Paz 45-381-05 La Paz 45-381-06 La Paz 45-381-07 Banta Barbara 45-381-12 Banta Barbara 45-381-13 La Paz 45-381-14 La Paz 45-391-01 Santa Barbara Rd 45-391-02 Atascadero Rd 45-411-01 Alondra 45-411-02 Alondra 45-411-03 Alondra 45-412-01 Alondra 45-421-01 Ban Diego Rd 45-421-02 San Diego Rd 45-421-03 San Diego Rd 45-421-04 Ban Diego Rd 45-421-06 Atascadero Rd 45-421-07 Atascadero Rd 45-421-08 Atascadero Rd 45-421-09 Atascadero Rd 45-431-01 San Diego Rd 45-431-02 San Diego Rd 45-431-05 San Diego Rd 45-431-04 San Diego Rd 45-441-01 Ban Rafael Rd 45-441-02 San Rafael Rd 45-441-05 San Diego Rd 45-441-03 San Diego Rd 45-441-09 Colorado 45-441-10 Colorado 45-441-13 Colorado 45-441-15 Colorado 45-441-17 Colorado 45-441-19 Colorado 45-441-21 Colorado 45-441-22 Colorado 45-441-24 Colorado 45-441-26 Colorado 45-441-27 Colorado 45-441-29 Colorado 45-441-30 Colorado 45-441-30 San Diego Rd 45-441-31 Colorado 45-441-32 Colorado 45-451-07 San Rafael Rd 45-451-11 Colorado 45-451-13 Colorado 45-451-15 Colorado 45-451-16 Colorado 45-451-18 Colorado 45-451-19 Colorado 45-451-20 Colorado 45-451-21 Colorado 45-451-26 Colorado 45-451-29 Colorado 45-451-30 Colorado 45-451-31 San' Diego 45-451-32 an Diego 45-451-40 Atascadero Rd 45-451-43 Atascadero Rd 45-451-43 Atascadero Rd 45-451-42 Atascadero Rd 45-451-44 Atasoadero Rd 45-451-36 Atascadero Rd 49-022-10 Ferro Carril 49-022-09 Ferro Carril 49-023-02 Ferro Carril 49-023-08 Ferro Carril 49-031-05 Traffic Way 49-031-06 Traffic Way 49-031-07 Traffic Way 49-031-08 Traffic Way 49-041-05 Santa Cruz 49-041-09 Santa Cruz 49-041-12 Santa Cruz 49-041-14 Santa Cruz • 49-041-13 Santa Cruz 49-041-15 Santa Cruz 49-041-16 Santa Cruz 49-042-13 Santa Cruz 49-041-18 Santa Cruz 49-041-17 Santa Cruz i 0 . Page • APN Street 1PN _t_re_e_t 49-042--18 Santa Cruz 49-042-26 Santa Cruz 49-042-23 Santa Cruz 49-051-21 Santa Cruz 49-042-25 Santa Cruz 49-042-07 Santa Cruz 49-051-10 Carrizo 49-051-12 Carrizo 49-051-18 Carrizo 49-052-25 Carrizo 49-051-23 Santa Cruz 49-051-25 Carrizo 49-052-02 Carrizo 49-052-01 Carrizo 49-052-18 Carrizo 49-052-03 Carrizo 49-052-23 Traffic Way 49-052-31 Traffic Way 49-052-29 Carrizo 49-052-19 Carrizo 49-052-32 Traffic Way 49-061-26 Traffic Way 49-052-36 Traffic Way 49-052-27 Traffic Way 49-052-37 Traffic Way 49-052-39 Traffic Way 49-061-04 Potrero 49-061-06 Potrero 49-061-10 Traffic Way 49-061-16 Traffic Way 49-061-12 Portero 49-061-11 Potrero 49-061-14 Obispo 49--061-22 Obispo 49-061-27 Traffic Way 49-061-23 Traffic Way 49-062-06 Potrero 49-062-07 Del Rio 49-071-06 Chico 49-071-08 Chico 49-071-18 San Benito 49-071-13 Traffic Way 49-072-04 Chico 49-072-05 Traffic Way 49-072-07 Chico 49-072-06 Chico 49-073-09 Del Rio 49-073-22 Del Rio 49-073-15 La Luz 49-073-62 La Luz 49-073-25 Del Rio 49-073-31 Del Rio 49-073-34 San Anselmo 49-073-35 Del Rio 49-073-47 La Luz 49-073-57 La Luz 49-073-48 Del Rio 49-073-70 Del Rio 49-073-55 San Anselmo 49-073-56 San Anselmo 49-073-58 La Luz 49-073-66 La Luz 49-073-63 La Luz 49-073-64 La Luz 49-073-65 La Luz 49-073-20 Arena 49-073-68 Del Rio 49-075-01 Arena 49-075-02 Arena 49-075-03 Arena 49-075-04 Arena 49-081-03 Garcia 49-081-03 Garcia 49-082-14 Garcia 49-082-16 Garcia 49-082-15 Santa Cruz 49-082-17 Santa Cruz 49-091-01 Garcia 49-091-04 Garcia 49-092-20 Garcia 49-092-07 Garcia 49-092-33 Garcia 49-092-16 San Ramon 49-092-17 San Ramon 49-092-32 Garcia 49-092-38 Garcia 49-092-36 San Ramon 49-093-06 San Ramon 49-092-41 San Ramon 49-092-42 San Ramon 49-092-45 Santa Cruz 49-092-43 Santa Cruz 49-093-07 San Ramon 49-093-35 San Ramon 49-093-36 San Ramon 49-101-25 Carrizo 49-101-20 Carrizo 49-101-18 Carrizo 49-101-22 Carrizo 49-101-19 Carrizo 49-102-08 El Camino Rl 49-102-09 El Camino R1 Page 17 III �1PN. Street (�_PN.. - �_treet. no l 49-102-20 E1 Camino R1 49 102 31 El Cami R 49-102-32 El Camino R1 49-102-56 El Camino Rl 49-102-46 Obispo 49-102-55 Obispo 49-102-48 Del Rio 49-102-49 Obispo 49-111-01 Obispo 49-111-08 Del Rio 49-ill-09 Obispo 49-111-11 Obipspo 49-111-19 Del Rio 49-111-22 Potrero 49-111-20 Del Rio 49-111-18 Del Rio 49-112-02 Del Rio 49-112-19 Del Rio 49-112-06 Del Rio 49-112-20 San Benito 49-112-24 Del Rio 49-112-05 Del Rio 49-112-26 Del Rio 49-112-29 Del Rio 49-112-28 Del Rio 49-112-25 Del Rio 49-112-31 San Benito 49-112-32 San Benito 49-121-12 La Luz 49-121-17 La Luz 49-121-15 La Luz 49-121-08 La Luz 49-121-20 San Benito 49-121-29 San Benito 49-121-30 Arena 49-121-03 Arena 49-121-31 Arena 49-131--32 Arena 49-122-04 Arena 49-122-26 Arena 49-122-09 Ealda 49-122-16 Ealda 49-122-13 Arena 49-122-03 Arena 49-122-14 San Benito 49-123-02 Liga 49-122-23 Liga 49-122-21 Amargon 49-122-25 Arena 49-122-27 Liga 49-123-07 Amargon 49-123-20 Amargon 49-123-22 Arena 49-123-18 Arena 49-123-27 Arena 49-123-23 Arena 49-123-29 Amargon 29-123-19 Amargon 49-123-32 Amargon 49-123-06 Amargon 49-123-34 Liga 49-123-33 Arena 49-131-32 E1 Camino Rl 49-131-45 E1 Camino Rl 49-131-46 El Camino R1 49-131-53 El Camino Rl 49-131-48 El Camino Rl 49-131-59 Del Rio 49-131-52 Del Rio 49-131-44 Del Rio 49-131-54 El Camino Rl 54-131-47 El Camino Rl 49-131-63 San Ramon 49-131-58 San Ramon 49-131-67 San Ramon 49-131-68 San Ramon 49-132-01 San Ramon 49-132-02 San Ramon 49-132-24 San Ramon 49-132-14 San Ramon 49-132-27 San Ramon 49-132-25 San Ramon 49-141-23 El Camino Rl 49-141-22 El Camino R1 49-141-26 El Camino Rl 49-141-24 El Camino Rl 49-141-35 Ramona 49-142-08 Ramona 49-141-36 E1 Camino R1 49-141-40 E1 Camino Rl 49-141-41 El Camino Rl 49-141-30 E1 Camino Rl 49-141-42 Ramona 49-141-43 Ramona 49-141-44 E1 Camino R1 49-141-38 Ramona ® 49-141-46 E1 Camino Rl 49-141-45 El Camino Rl 49-151-08 El Camino Rl 49-151-09 E1 Camino R1 49-151-11 El Camino Rl 49-151-16 El Camino Rl Page 18 A P NStreetA PNStreet _ . _ _ _ _ . _ - - - - - . 49-151 -12 San Benito 49-151-34 San Benito 49-151-17 El Camino Rl 49-151-44 San Benito 49-151-20 E1 Camino Rl 49-151-24 El Camino Rl 49-151-33 San Benito 49-151-48 San Benito 49-151-37 El Camino Rl 49-151-06 El Camino Rl 49-151-40 El Camino Rl 49-151-41 E1 Camino Rl 49-152-02 Colima 49-152-04 Colima 49-152-19 San Benito 49-152-27 Colima 49-152-29 San Benito 49-152-14 San Benito 49-152-33 El Camino Rl 49-161-08 Silla 49-152-35 La Uva 49-152-37 La Uva 49-152-39 La Uva 49-152-31 El Camino Rl 49-152-42 La Uva 49-152-41 La Uva 49-161-05 Colima 49-163-05 Colima 49-161-09 Silla 49-161-12 Silla 49-163-08 Colima 49-163-09 Colima 49-163-10 Colima 49-163-11 Colima 49-163-13 Colima 49-163-14 Colima 49-163-17 El Camino Rl 49-163-18 El Camino Rl 49-163-19 El Camino R1 49-163-20 El Camino R1 49-163-21 E1 Camino R1 49-163-22 El Camino Rl 49-163-23 E1 Camino Rl 49-163-24 E1 Camino R1 49-163-25 El Camino Rl 49-163-26 El Camino Rl 49-163-27 El Camino R1 49-163-28 E1 Camino Rl 49-163-29 E1 Camino R1 49-163-30 El Camino Rl 49-163-31 E1 Camino R1 49-163-32 E1 Camino Rl 49-163-33 El Camino Rl 49-163-34 El Camino Rl 49-163-35 E1 Camino Rl 49-163-36 El Camino Rl 49-163-37 El Camino R1 49-163-38 E1 Camino R1 49-163-39 El Camino R1 49-163-40 E1 Camino Rl 49-163-41 El Camino Rl 49-163-42 E1 Camino Rl 49-163-43 E1 Camino R1 49-163-44 El Camino Rl 49-163-45 E1 Camino Rl 49-163-46 E1 Camino Rl 49-163-47 E1 Camino Rl 49-163-66 El Camino Rl 49-163-50 San Anselmo 49-163-51 San Anselmo 49-163-52 San Anselmo 49-172-01 Santa Cruz 49-163-56 Colima 49-163-58 Colima 49-163-59 Colima 49-163-61 Silla 49-163-62 Silla 49-163-63 Silla 49-163-65 Silla 49-163-16 El Camino R1 49-172-01 Santa Cruz 49-172-02 Santa Cruz 49-172-02 Santa Cruz 49-172-14 Santa Cruz 49-172-06 Santa Cruz 49-172-15 Santa Cruz 49-172-12 Santa Cruz 49-172-06 Santa Cruz 49-172-14 Santa Cruz 49-172-12 Santa Cruz 49-172-15 Santa Cruz 49-172-16 Santa Cruz 49-172-16 Santa Cruz 49-172-17 Santa Cruz 49-172-17 Santa Cruz 49-172-18 Santa Cruz 49-172-19 Santa Cruz 49-011-01 Railroad 49-172-19 Santa Cruz 49-172-20 Santa Cruz 49-172-20 Santa Cruz 49-172-18 Santa Cruz • 1 PNStreet P NStreet t Page 19 _ _ .... . ......... ... _ 49-181-05 Garcia 49-181-07 Garcia 49--181-06 Garcia 49-182-03 Garcia 49-182-15 Garcia - 49-183-18 San Gregorio 49-183-10 San Gregorio 49-183-21 San Gregorio 49-183-14 Del Rio 49-191-37 Del Rio 49-183-23 San Gregorio 49-183-11 Del Rio 49-191-02 Conejo 49-191-08 Conejo 49-191-16 Conejo 49-191-34 Conejo 49-191-22 Monterey Rd 49-191-23 Monterey Rd 49-191-27 Del Rio 49-191-26 Del Rio 49-191-31 Monterey Rd 49-201-14 El Camino Rl 49-191-36 Conejo 49-191-35 Conejo 49-191-38 Del Rio 49-191-30 Del Rio 49-201-03 Monterey 49-202-16 Monterey 49-201-21 El Camino Rl 49-201-26 Ramona 49-201-24 El Camino Rl 49-201-10 El Camino R1 49-202-08 Monterey 49-202-09 Monterey 49-202-19 Monterey 49-202-17 Monterey 49-202-21 Monterey 49-202-20 Monterey 49-211-05 El Camino R1 49-211-40 El Camino Rl 49-211-16 E1 Camino R1 49-211-43 El Camino Rl 49-211-20 El Camino R1 49-211-03 El Camino Rl 49-211-32 Ramona 49-211-27 Ramona 49-211-38 Ramona 49-211-11 Ramona 49-211-48 El Camino R1 49-211-49 El Camino R1 49-21150 Ramona 49-211-42 Ramona 49-212-01 Ramona 49-212-02 Ramona 49-212-17 Ramona 49-212-12 Ramona 49-212-19 Ramona 49-212-06 Ramona 49-212-20 Ramona 49-212-21 Ramona 49-213-01 El Camino Rl 49-213-02 El Camino Rl 49-221-34 El Camino R1 49-221-27 El Camino Rl 49-221-46 Monterey 49-221-57 Monterey 49-221-52 Monterey 49-221-54 Monterey 49-221-55 Monterey 49-221-56 Monterey 49-221-58 Monterey 49-221-49 Monterey 49-221-63 El Camino R1 49-221-59 Monterey 49-222-38 E1 Camino R1 49-222-39 El Camino R1 49-222-57 San Palo 49-222-63 San Palo 49-222-65 San Palo 49-222-46 San Palo 49-223-24 Monterey 49-223-29 Monterey 49-223-30 Monterey 49-223-05 Monterey 49-223-33 Monterey 49-223-34 Monterey 49-224-26 El Camino Rl 49-231-02 San Gregorio 49-231-01 San Gregorio 49-231-03 San Gregorio 49-231-11 San Gregorio 49-231-33 San Gregorio 49-231-14 San Gregorio 49-231-05 San Gregorio 49-232-13 Del Rio 49-232-18 Del Rio 49-232-16 Del Rio 49-232-20 Del Rio 49-232-21 Del Rio 49-232-32 Del Rio 49-232-22 Del Rio 49-232-12 Del Rio ..... .. ... ... Page �O AP_N_ Street APN. Street 49-232-28 San Gregorio 49-232-29 San Gregorio 49-232-31 San Gregorio 49-232-27 San Gregorio 49-232-34 San Gregorio 49-232-35 San Gregorio 49-241-09 San Fernando 49-241-08 San Fernando 49-241-25 Del Rio 49-241-19 Del Rio 49-241-33 Alturas 49-251-35 Monterey 49-241-36 Del Rio 49-213-38 Del Rio 49-241-40 San Fernando 49-241-45 Alturas 49-251-19 Monterey 49-251-39 Ardilla 49-251-23 Monterey 49-251-17 Monterey 49-251-36 Monterey 49-251-37 Monterey 49-251-38 Monterey 49-251-20 Monterey 49-251-40 Ardilla 49-251-41 Ardilla 49-251-42 Ardilla 49-251-45 Ardilla 49-252-02 Monterey 49-252-05 Monterey 49-252-07 Monterey 49-252-08 Monterey 49-262-01 Monterey 49-262-02 Monterey 49-262-03 Monterey 49-262-35 Monterey 49-262-27 Monterey 49-262-07 Monterey 49-262-31 Monterey 49-271-16 San Fernando 49-262-36 Monterey 49-262-28 Monterey 49-271-17 San Fernando 49-271-20 San Fernando 49-271-21 San Fernando 49-281-11 San Fernando 49-281-02 San Fernando 49-281-04 San Fernando 49-301-01 Amargon 49-301-04 Amargon 49-301-08 Falda 49-302-06 Falda 49-301-09 Amargon 49-301-10 Amargon 49-301-13 Amargon 49-301-16 Amargon 49-301-19 Amargon 49-301-18 Amargon 49-301-20 Falda 49-301-21 Falda 49-302-14 Colima 49-312-12 Colima 49-302-15 Falda 49-302-25 Falda 49-302-24 Colima 49-302-17 Colima 49-302-28 Falda 49-302-29 Falda 49-302-32 Falda 49-302-38 Colima 49-311-03 Carrizo 49-311-04 Carrizo 49-311-06 Carrizo 49-321-08 Santa Cruz 49-312-02 San Anselmo 49-311-01 Carrizo 49-312-09 Colima 49-312-05 Colima 49-321-12 Santa Cruz 49-321-18 Santa Cruz 49-321-14 Santa Cruz 49-321-09 Santa Cruz 49-321-15 Santa Cruz 49-321-16 Santa Cruz 49-321-17 Santa Cruz 49-321-11 Santa Cruz 49-321-19 Santa Cruz 49-322-01 Paseo Pacifica 49-322-02 Paseo Pacifica 49-322-03 Paseo Pacifica 49-322-04 Paseo Pacifica 49-322-07 Paseo Pacifica 49-322-09 Paseo Pacifica 49-331-01 Ardilla 49-331-02 Ardilla 49-331-04 Ardilla 49-331-06 Ardilla 49-331-21 Ardilla 49-331-13 Graves Creek 55-011-16 Santa Lucia 49-331-19 Balboa 49-331-09 Balboa A P N Street A PNStreet Page 21 _ _ _ . _ . .......... .._.....I...._....._............. 49-331-22 Ardilla 49-331-23 Ardilla 49-331-24 Ardilla 49-331-25 Ardilla 49-331-26 Ardilla 49-331-20 Balboa 50-011-03 Santa Cruz 50-011-02 Santa Cruz 50-011-07 Santa Cruz 50-011-08 Santa Cruz 50-012-14 San Gregorio 50-012-13 San Gregorio 50-012-20 San Gregorio 50-012-18 San Gregorio 50-012-24 Santa Cruz 50-012-23 Santa Cruz 50-012-25 San Gregorio 50-012-21 San Gregorio 50-012-27 Santa Cruz 50-012-01 Santa Cruz 50-021-14 San Gregorio 50-021-02 San Gregorio 50-021-19 San Gregorio 50-021-30 San Gregorio 50-021-22 Del Rio 50-021-04Del Rio 50-021-22 San Gregorio 50-021-20 San Gregorio 50-021-23 San Gregorio 50-021-13 San Gregorio 50-021-25 San Gregorio 50-031-26 Alturas 50-021-26 Del Rio 50-021-21 San Gregorio 50-021-27 San Gregorio 50-021-24 San Gregorio 50-021-28 Del Rio 50-021-29 Del Rio 50-021-31 Del Rio 50-021-32 Del Rio 50-031-11 Del Rio 50-031-10 Del Rio 50-031-19 Alturas 50-031-08 Alturas ® 50-031-20 Del Rio 50-03133 Del Rio 50-031-22 Del Rio 50-031-03 Del Rio 50-031-28 Alturas 50-031-16 Alturas 50-031-30 Del Rio 50-031-29 Del Rio 50-031-34 Del Rio 50-031-35 Del Rio 50-031-39 Alturas 50-031-38 Alturas 50-031-41 Alturas 50-031-40 Alturas 50-041-12 Alturas 50-041-11 Alturas 50-042-02 Alturas 50-042-03 Alturas 50-042-08 Alturas 50-042-07 Alturas 50-042-10 Alturas 50-042-09 Alturas 50-042-12 Alturas 50-042-11 Alturas 50-043-02 Alturas 50-042-01 Alturas 50-043-06 Balboa 50-043-05 Balboa 50-051-01 San Fernando 50-051-22 San Fernando 50-051-06 Balboa 50-051-27 Balboa 50-051-14 Balboa 50-051-16 Balboa 50-051-15 Balboa 50-061-09 Balboa 50-051-18 Balboa 50-051-17 Balboa 50-051-20 Balboa 50-051-05 Balboa 50-051-23 San Fernando 50-051-21 San Fernando 50-051-26 Balboa 50-051-25 Balboa 50-051-28 Balboa 50-051-19 Balboa 50-051-30 Balboa 50-051-29 Balboa 50-061-10 Balboa 50-063-01 Balboa 50-061-11 Balboa 50-061-03 Balboa • 50-061-13 Ardilla 50-061-12 Ardilla 50-061-14 Ardilla 50-081-14 Santa Cruz 50-071-24 Ardilla 50-071-31 Ardilla ..... Page W.P_N Street APN Street 50-071-25 Graves Ck 50-071-10 Graves Ck 50-071-33 Graves Ck 50-071-22 Graves Ck 50-081-09 Santa Cruz 50-081-01 Santa Cruz 50-081-11 Santa Cruz 50-081-10 Santa Cruz 50-081-13 Santa Cruz 50-081-12 Santa Cruz 50-091-07 San Gregorio 50-092-03 San Gregorio 50-091-13 San Gregorio 50-091-12 San Gregorio 50-091-14 San Gregorio 50-091-04 San Gregorio 50-092-08 San Gregorio 50-092-09 Del Rio 50-092-10 Del Rio 50-092-07 Del Rio 50-101-01 Del Rio 50-101-02 Del Rio 50-101-01 Del Rio 50-101-02 Del Rio 50-101-09 e Rio 50-101-15 Del Rio Del 50-101-09 Del Rio 50-101-15 Del Rio 50-101-11 Del Rio 50-101-12 Del Rio: 50-101-11 Del Rio 50-101-10 Del Rio 50-111-03 Alturas 50-111-13 Alturas 50-111-04 Alturas 50-111-10 Alturas 50-111-04 Alturas 50-111-10 Alturas 50-111-12 Del Rio 50-111-11 Del Rio 50-111-12 Del Rio 50-111-11 Del Rio 50-111-14 Balboa 50-111-08 Balboa 50-111-14 Balboa 50-111-08 Balboa 50-111-16 Balboa 50-111-15 Balboa 50-111-17 Balboa 50-111-15 Balboa 50-111-18 Santa Ana 50-111-16 Santa Ana 50-111-18 Santa Ana 50-111-17 Balboa 50-111-19 Alturas 50-111-20 Del Rio 50-111-19 Del Rio 50-111-20 Del Rio 50-121-06 Santa Ana 50-121-08 Balboa 50-121-13 Balboa 50-121-21 San Fernando 50-121-24 San Fernando 50-121-21 San Fernando 50-121-24 San Fernando 50-131-20 San Fernando 50-122-03 Balboa 50-122-15 Balboa 50-122-03 Balboa 50-122-15 Balboa 50-122-19 Balboa 50-122-18 Balboa 50- 122-19 Balboa 50-122-18 Balboa 50-131-02 Balboa 50-131-27 Balboa 50-131-04 Balboa 50-131-14 Balboa 50-131-05 Balboa 50-131-15 Balboa 50-131-05 Balboa 50-071-35 Graves Ck 50-131-18 San Fernando 50-131-16 Balboa 50-1.31-18 San Fernando 50-131-16 Balboa 50-131-20 San Fernando 50-131-29 San Fernando 50-131-22 San Fernando 50-131-23 San Fernando 50-131-23 San Fernando 50-131-24 San Fernando 50-131-24 San Fernando 50-131-25 San Fernando 50-131-25 San Fernando 50-131-09 San Fernando 50-131-28 Balboa 50-141-26 Balboa 50-131-29 San Fernando 50-131-30 San Fernando 50-131--30 San Fernando 50-131-22 San Fernando • 0 Page 23 APN `: greet _pN _ ,�.��..�. ... .................................... 50--141-08 Balboa 50-141-09 Balboa 50-141-14 San Fernando 50-141-22 San Fernando 50-141-16 San Fernando 50-141-15 San Fernando 50-141-19 Balboa 50-141-13 San Fernando 50-141-23 San Fernando 50-151-10 San Fernando 50-141-25 Balboa 50-141-04 Balboa 50-141-27 Balboa 50-141-24 Balboa 50-141-28 Balboa 50-141-29 Balboa 50-141-31 Balboa 50-141-32 Balboa 50-151-04 Ardilla 50--173-19 Santa Ana 50-151-06 Ardilla 50-151-05 Ardilla 50-151-08 Ardilla 50-151-07 Ardilla 50-151-12 San Fernando 50-152-14 San Fernando 50-151-19 San Fernando 50-151-11 San Fernando 50-152-15 San Fernando 50-152-17 Graves Ck 50-153-08 Graves Ck 50-153-05 Graves Ck 50-173-06 Santa Ana 50-173-12 Santa Ana 50-202-05 Balboa 50-202-08 Otero 50-202-11 Otero 50-202-12 Otero 50-221-05 Corriente 50-221-38 Corriente 50-221-12 San Fernando 50-221-25 San Fernando 50-221-19 Corriente 50-221-18 Corriente 50-221-22 Santa Ana 50-221-23 Santa Ana • 50-221-29 Cebada 50-221-30 Cebada 50-221-31 Cebada 50-221-36 Cebada 50-221-37 Santa Ana 50-221-17 San Fernando 50-221-39 Corriente 50-221-13 Corriente 50-231-04 San Fernando 50-231-22 San Fernando 50-231-06 San Fernando 50-231-05 San Fernando 50-231-16 San Fernando 50-231-14 San Fernando 50-231-20 San Fernando 50-231-19 San Fernando 50-231-25 Cebada 50-231-26 Cebada 50-231-30 Cebada 50-231-31 Cebada 50-231-32 San Fernando 50-231-24 Cebada 50-241-02 Bolsa 50-242-05 Llano 50-242-02 Llano 50-242-14 Balboa 50-242-07 Otero 50-262-12 Santa Ana 50-242-13 Llano 50-242-03 Llano 50-262-13 Santa Ana 50-261-01 Santa Ana 50-262-16 Santa Ana 50-262-03 Santa Ana 50-262-18 Santa Ana 50-262-17 Santa Ana 50-271-08 Santa Ana 50-271-09 Santa Ana 50-271-10 Santa Ana 50-271-18 Cebada 50-271-11 Santa Ana 50-271-17 Santa Ana 50-271-19 Cebada 50-271-14 Cebada 50-271-20 Santa Ana 50-271-15 Santa Ana 50-281-05 Santa Ana 50-281-04 Santa Ana 50-281-09 Santa Ana 50-281-02 Santa Ana 50-312-09 El Monte 50-312-20 El Monte 50-312-11 Santa Lucia 50-312-12 Santa Lucia 50-312-13 El Monte 50-312-19 Santa Lucia Page 24 APN street CPN_ street 50-312-15 E1 Monte 50-312-14 E1 Monte 50-312-17 Santa Lucia 50-312-18 Santa Lucia 50-321-08 Santa Lucia 50-321-10 Santa Lucia 50-323-05 Santa Lucia 50-323-06 Santa Lucia 50-323-07 Santa Lucia 50-323-18 Llano 50-323-15 Santa Lucia 50-323-04 Santa Lucia 50-323-16 Bolsa 50-323--14 Bolsa 50-323-20 Bolsa 50-323-19 Bolsa 50-324-03 Santa Lucia 50-324-14 Santa Lucia 50-324-15 Santa Lucia 50-321-06 Santa Lucia 50-331-10 Llano 50-331-13 Lomitas 50-331-14 Llano 50-331-06 Llano 50-331-16 Lomitas 50-341-16 Lomitas 50-331-17 Llano 50-331-18 Llano 50-341-03 Lomitas 50-341-20 Lomitas 50-341-06 Lomitas 50-341-23 Lomitas 50-341-14 Santa Lucia 50-351-11 Llano 50-341-22 Lomitas 50-341-04 Lomitas 50-341-24 Lomitas 50-341-25 Lomitas 50-351-09 Llano 50-351-10 Llano 50-361-06 E1 Monte 50-362-10 San Lucas 54-011-17 Ardilla Rd 54-011-21 Ardilla Rd 54-011-19 San Anselmo 54-011-18 San Anselmo 54-011-19 San Anselmo 54-011-18 San Anselmo 54-011-21 San Anselmo 54-011-20 San Anselmo 54-011-23 San Anselmo 54-012-37 Ardilla 54-011-23 San Anselmo 54-012-37 Ardilla Rd 54-011-25 San Anselmo 54-011-24 San Anselmo 54-011-25 San Anselmo 54-011-24 San Anselmo 54-012-02 Ardilla 54-012-41 Ardilla 54-012-05 Ardilla Rd 54-012-10 Ardilla Rd 54-012-10 Ardilla 54-012-29 Portola 54-012-17 Ardilla 54-012-27 Ardilla 54-012-17 Ardilla Rd 54-012-27 Ardilla Rd 54-012-26 Ardilla 54-012-05 Ardilla 54-012-26 Ardilla Rd 54-012-41 Ardilla Rd 54-012-29 Portola 54-012-34 Portola 54-012-33 Portola 54-012-36 Venado 54-012-34 Portola 54-012-33 Portola 54-012-35 Venado 54-012-39 Venado 54-012-35 Venado 54-013-23 Ardilla 54-012=38 Venado 54-012-36 Venado 54-012-39 Ardilla Rd 54-012-02 Ardilla Rd 54-013-17 Ardilla 54-013-16 Ardilla 54-013-17 Ardilla 54-014-04 Maricopa 54-013-18 Ardilla 54-013-21 Ardilla 54-013-20 Maricopa 54-013-02 Maricopa 54-013-24 Ardilla 54-013-23 Ardilla 54-013-24 Ardilla 54-013-16 Ardilla 54-014-05 Maricopa 54-021-20 Chauplin 54-021-07 Portola 54-021-17 Portola . Page. 25 p N. Street r e_e..t f�_P.N_ Street_ _ 54-021--07 Portola Rd S4-022-18 Portola Rd S4-021-13 Portola 54-021-20 Portola 54-022-04 Portola 54-022-12 Portola 54-022-12 Portola Rd S4-022-04 Portola Rd S4-022-19 Portola 54-022-18 Portola 54-022-19 Allemande Ln 54-032-22 Maricopa 54-022-21 Portola 54-022-27 Portola 54-022-21 Allemande Ln 54-022-27 Allemande Ln 54-031-37 E1 Camino Rl 54-031-41 Coromar 54-032-41 Maricopa 54-032-22 Maricopa 54-032-41 Maricopa 54-032-SS Monterey Rd 54-032-56 Monterey S4-032-55 Monterey 54-032-S8 Monterey S4-041-08 Maricopa S4-041-06 Maricopa 54-041-17 San Benita 54-041-06 Maricopa 54-041-08 Maricopa 54-041-11 Maricopa 54-041-18 Graves Creek 54-041-18 San Benito 54-043-23 Maricopa 54-041-19 Graves Creek 54-043-23 Maricopa 54-043-07 Ardilla 54-051-60 Portola S4-043-07 Ardilla Rd 54-051-44 Ardilla Rd 54-043-10 Ardilla Rd 54-043-08 Ardilla Rd S4-043-11 Ardilla 54--043-18 Ardilla 54-043-11 Ardilla Rd 54-043-12 Ardilla Rd 54-043-13 Ardilla 54-043-12 Ardilla 54-043-13 Ardilla Rd 54-043-18 Ardilla Rd S4-043-19 Ardilla 54-043-08 Ardilla 54-043-19 Ardilla Rd 54-043-09 Ardilla Rd S4-043-21 Ardilla S4-043-14 Ardilla 54-043-22 Ardilla Rd 54-043-14 Ardilla Rd 54-051-10 Portola 54-051-63 Portola 54-051-33 Portola 54-051-63 Portola 54-OS1-41 Portola 54-051-33 Portola 54-051-46 Ardilla 54-051-47 Ardilla 54-051-47 Ardilla Rd 54-051-46 Ardilla Rd 54-051-51 Portola 54-051-10 Portola 54-051-58 Ardilla 54-051-44 Ardilla S4-OSI-58 Ardilla Rd 54-051-57 Ardilla Rd 54-051-60 Portola 54-061-32 Portola 54-051-67 Portola 54-051-61 Portola 54-051-69 Portola 54-051-67 Portola 54-051-70 Portola 54-051-69 Portola 54-051-70 Portola 54-051-71 Portola 54-061-26 Portola 54-061-07 Santa Lucia 54-061-35 Portola 54-061--22 Portola 54-061-37 Santa Lucia 54-061-10 Santa Lucia 54-061-40 Portola 54-061-01 Portola 54-061-41 Santa Lucia 54-061-42 Santa Lucia 54-061-43 Portola 54-061-45 Portola • 54-061-48 Santa Lucia 54-061-50 Santa Lucia 54-061-S3 Armtrong Ln 54-061-54 Armstrong Ln 54-061-58 Santa Lucia 54-061-59 Santa Lucia .... ._ N .t_..... P N Street Page 5 -071--02 Portola 54-072-73 Portola 54-071-33 Portola 54-071-31 Portola 54-072-06 Portola 54-072-40 Portola S4-072-21 Los Gatos 54-072-22 Los Gatos 54-072-22 Los Gatos 54-073-26 Portola 54-072-33 Santa Lucia 54-072-16 Santa Lucia 54-072-34 Flores 54-072-77 Flores 54-072-41 Portola 54-072-67 Portola 54-072-48 Portola 54-072-28 Portola 54-072-59 Portola S4-072-05 Portola 54--072-61 Portola 54-072-60 Portola 54-072-63 Flores 54-072-21 Los Gatos S4-072-68 Portola 54-072-37 Portola 54-072-69 Santa Lucia 54-072-70 Santa Lucia 54-072-72 Portola 54-072-23 Portola 54-072-76 Santa Lucia 54-072-77 Santa Lucia 54-073-18 Portola 54-082-13 Portola 54-073-20 Portola 54-073-21 Portola 54-073-27 Portola 54-073-29 Portola 54-073-30 Portola S4-073-22 Portola 54-081-14 Portola 54-081-22 Portola 54-081-33 Portola 54-081-27 Portola 54-081-44 Portola 54-081-19 Portola 54-081-45 Portola 54-081-51 Portola 54-082-13 San Marcos 54-084-01 Portola 54-084-01 San Marcos 54-084-07 San Marcos 54-084-04 San Marcos 54-085-49 Portola 54-084-05 San Marcos 54-084-06 San Marcos 54-084-06 San Marcos 54-084-04 Los Gatos 54-084-07 San Marcos 54-084-05 San Marcos 54-085-16 Portola 54-085-50 Portola 54-085-16 Portola 54-085-02 Bella Vista 54-085-28 Bella Vista 54-086-06 Bella Vista 54-085-32 Bella Vista 54-085-38 Bella Vista 54-085-39 Bella Vista 54-085-07 Bella Vista 54-085-41 Portola 54-085-40 Portola 54-085-41 Portola 54-085-10 Portola 54-085-48 Portola 54-085-49 Portola 54-085-48 Portola 54-085-40 Portola 54-085-51 Portola 54-085-10 Portola 54-085-51 Portola 54-085-50 Portola 54-086-03 Bella Vista 54-085-07 Bella Vista 54-086-04 Bella Vista 54-085-32 Bella Vista 54-086-04 Bella Vista 54-086-03 Bella Vista 54-086-06 Bella Vista 54-085-38 Bella Vista 54-086-10 Bella Vista 54-086-17 Bella Vista 54-086-10 Bella Vista 54-086-15 Bella Vista 54-086-15 Bella Vista 54-085-28 Bella Vista 54-091-13 Cascabel 54-091-11 Cascabel . 54-091-17 Cascabel 54-091-14 Cascabel 54-091-21 Cascabel 54-091-20 _ Cascabel P* Street t 1PN Street Mage 27 _ _ _ _ . ... ........._....... .................._....__... 54-091-22 Cascabel 54--091-23 Cascabel 54-091-25 Cascabel 54-091-24 Cascabel 54-092-02 Cascabel 54-092-01 Cascabel 54-092-11 Cascabel 54-092-14 Cascabel 54-092-15 Cascabel 54-092-22 Cascabel 54-101-16 Cascabel 54-102-21 Cascabel 54-101-19 Santa Lucia 54-111-39 Los Gatos 54-111-39 Los Gatos 54-122-30 Flores 54-111-40 Santa Lucia 54-111-24 Santa Lucia 54-111-45 Santa Lucia 54-111-35 Santa Lucia 54-111-46 Santa Lucia 54-111-44 Santa Lucia 54-121-14 San Gabriel 54-121-38 San Marcos 54-121-22 Los Gatos 54-121-03 Los Gatos 54-121-22 Los Gatos 54-121-03 Los Gatos 54-121-25 Los Gatos 54-121-30 Los Gatos 54-121-29 Los Gatos 54-121-30 Los Gatos 54-121-30 Los Gatos 54-072-28 Los Gatos 54-121-35 San Marcos 54-121-12 Los Gatos 54-121-35 Los Gatos 54-121-12 Los Gatos 54-121-36 San Marcos 54-121-37 San Marcos 54-121-37 San Marcos 54-121-36 San Marcos 54-121-38 San Marcos 54-121-32 San Gabriel 54-121-39 San Gabriel 54-121-32 San Gabriel 54-121-39 San Gabriel 54-122-12 Flores 54-122-12 Flores 54-072-16 Santa Lucia 54-122-30 Flores 54-131-12 San Marcos 54-131-10 San Marcos 54-131-16 San Gabriel 54-131-16 San Gabriel 54-132-08 San Marcos 54-132-25 San Gabriel 54-132-34 San Marcos 54-132-27 San Gabriel 54-132-65 San Gabriel 54-132-34 San Marcos 54-132-44 San Marcos 54-132-37 San Marcos 54-132-39 San Marcos 54-132-39 San Marcos 54-132-70 San Marcos 54-132-44 San Marcos 54-132-37 San Marcos 54-132-4S San Gabriel 54-132-11 San Gabriel 54-132-45 San Gabriel 54--132-11 San Gabriel 54-132-54 San Marcos 54-131-10 San Marcos 54-132-54 San Marcos 54-132-08 San Marcos 54-132-69 San Marcos 54-132-52 San Marcos 54-132-70 San Marcos 54-132-52 San Marcos 54-133-25 San Gabriel 54-211-05 San Gabriel 54-133-27 San Gabriel 54-133-65 San Gabriel 54-141-05 Bella Vista 54-085-02 Bella Vista 54-141-05 Bella Vista 54-142-35 Bella Vista 54-142-03 S. Gabriel 54-142-23 S. Gabriel 54-142-04 San Gabriel 54-142-13 San Gabriel 54-142-06 San Gabriel 54-142-31 San Gabriel 54-142-08 Carmelita 54-142-16 Carmelita • 54-142-08 S. Gabriel 54-142-26 S. Gabriel 54-142-12 Carmelita 54-143-06 Carmelita 54-142-13 S. Gabriel 54-142-04 S. Gabriel N Street et ..P NStreet e t Pace _ _ _ _ _ .. ... ...._ 54-142-1S San Gabriel S4-142-16 Carmelita 54-142-16 S. Gabriel S4-142-15 S. Gabriel 54-142-21 S . Gabriel 54-142-06 S . Gabriel S4-142-21 San Gabriel 54-142-08 San Gabriel 54-142-23 San Gabriel S4-142-03 San Gabriel 54-142-27 S. Gabriel 54-142-28 S . Gabriel 54-142-27 San Gabriel 54-142-28 San Gabriel 54-142-32 S. Gabriel 54-142-31 S . Gabriel 54-142-32 San Gabriel 54-142-26 San Gabriel 54-142-36 Bella Vista 54-142-29 Bella Vista 54--143-09 Carmelita 54-142-12 Carmelita 54-143-09 Carmelita 54-143-08 Carmelita 54-151-19 Santa Rosa 54-151-18 Santa Rosa 54-151-25 Morro Rd 54-151-26 Morro Rd 54-151-31 Morro Rd 54-151-21 Morro Rd 54-151-39 San Gabriel 54-151-13 San Gabriel 54-151-39 San Gabriel 54-151-13 San Gabriel 54-151-41 Santa Rosa 54-151-48 Santa Rosa 54-151-42 Santa Rosa 54-151-43 Santa Rosa 54-151-46 San Gabriel 54-151-45 San Gabriel 54-151-46 San Gabriel 54-151-45 San Gabriel 54-151-47 Santa Rosa 54-151-55 Santa Rosa 54-151-50 Santa Rosa 54-161-08 Graves Ck 54-151-54 Santa Rosa 54-151-53 Santa Rosa 54-161-07 Graves Ck 54-162-06 Graves Ck 54-161-09 Graves Ck 54-161-06 Graves Ck 54-162-03 Santa Ana 54-171-27 Santa Ana 54-162-05 Graves Ck 54-161-04 Santa Ana 54-162-07 Santa Ana 54-162-08 Santa Ana 54-171-19 Santa Lucia 54-181-21 San Gabriel 54-171-22 Santa Ana 54-171-21 Santa Ana 54-171-24 Santa Ana 54-171-23 Santa Ana 54-171-26 Santa Ana 54-171-25 Santa Ana 54-181-03 Santa Lucia 54-201-27 San Gabriel 54-201-24 San Marcos 54-201-53 Escondido 54-201-26 San Gabriel 54-201-27 San Gabriel 54-201-26 San Gabriel 54-201-25 San Gabriel 54-201-35 San Marcos 54-201-36 San Marcos 54-201-44 San Marcos 54-301-43 San Marcos 54-201-45 San Marcos 54-201-46 San Marcos 54-201-48 San Marcos 54-201-12 San Marcos 54-201-49 San Gabriel 54-201-50 San Gabriel 54-201-49 San Gabriel 54-201-50 San Gabriel 54-201-51 San Gabriel 54-201-25 San Gabriel 54-201-51 San Gabriel 54-201-47 San Marcos 54-201-52 Escondido 54-201-37 Escondido 54-211-07 San Gabriel 54-211-10 San Gabriel 54-211-08 San Gabriel 54-211-05 San Gabriel 54-211-10 San Gabriel 54-211-07 San Gabriel 54-212-14 San Gabriel 54-212-29 San Gabriel 54-212-24 San Gabriel 54-212-13 San Gabriel i • • .. Page 29 APf�I Street1PNt_re_et 54-212-24 San Gabriel S4-212-14 San Gabriel S4-212-2S Carmelita 54-212-32 Carmelita 54-212-25 Carmelita 54-212-26 Carmelita 54-212-27 San Gabriel 54-212-23 San Gabriel 54-212-27 San Gabriel S4-212-23 San Gabriel 54-212-29 San Gabriel S4-212-30 San Gabriel 54-212-30 San Gabriel 54-212-19 San Gabriel S4-212-32 Carmelita 54-212--33 Carmelita S4-212-33 Carmelita S4-212-3S Carmelita 54-212-35 Carmelita 54-212-19 Carmelita 54-221-OS Carmelita S4-221-08 Carmelita S4-221-05 Carmelita 54-231-07 Old Morro Rd E 54-221--11 San Gabriel 54-211-08 San Gabriel 54-221-11 Carmelita 54-221-08 Carmelita 54--231-08 Old Morro Rd E 54-231-06 Old Morro Rd E 54-231-14 Old Morro Rd E 54-231-28 Los Osos Rd 54-231-18 San Gabriel 54-241-25 San Gabriel 54-231-19 San Rafael 54-231-18 San Rafael 54-231-19 San Rafael 54-231-22 San Rafael 54-231-20 Old Morro Rd E 54-231-21 Old Morro Rd E 54-231-22 San Rafael 54-011-17 Ardilla S4-231-24 Old Morro Rd E S4-231-25 Old Morro Rd E • 54-231-31 San Dimas Ct 54-231-34 San Dimas Ct S4-231-32 San Dimas Ct 54-231-33 San Dimas Ct 54-231-35 San Rafael 54-231-39 San Rafael 54-231-36 San Rafael 54-231-37 San Rafael 54-231-37 San Rafael 54-231-36 San Rafael 54-231-39 San Rafael 54-231-38 San Rafael 54-231-41 Old Morro Rd E S4-231-40 Old Morro Rd E 54-231-42 Los Osos Rd 54-231-43 Los Osos Rd 54-231-44 Old Morro Rd E 54-231-45 Old Morro Rd E S4-241-02 San Gabriel 54-241-18 San Gabriel 54-241-18 San Gabriel 54-241-22 San Gabriel 54-241-20 San Gabriel 54-241-22 San Gabriel 54-241-30 San Rafael 54-241-34 San Rafael 54-241-34 San Rafael 54-241-40 San Rafael 54-241-37 San Gabriel 54-241-30 San Rafael 54-241-37 San Gabriel 54-241-02 San Gabriel 54-241-39 San Rafael 54-231-35 San Rafael 54-241-40 San Rafael 54-241-39 San Rafael 54-251-02 Tecolote 54-251-04 Tecolote 54-251-05 Tecolote 54-251-03 Tecolote 54-261-01 Santa Lucia 54-261-04 Santa Lucia 54-261-03 Santa Lucia 54-261-13 Santa Lucia 54-261-10 Santa Lucia 54-261-09 Santa Lucia 54-262-OS Santa Lucia 54-271-07 Laurel 54-262-06 Santa Lucia 54-262-04 Santa Lucia 54-272-06 Santa Lucia 54-281-13 Laurel 54-272-14 Llano 54-272-17 Llano 54-272-15 Santa Lucia 54-272-16 Santa Lucia 54-272-20 Gallina Ct 54-272-21 Gallina Ct Page 30 { pNt� .et APN_ tret • 5.-272-22 Gallina Ct 54-272-23 Gallina Ct 54--272-24 Gallina Ct 54-272-25 Gallina Ct 54-281-07 Portal 54-281-10 Portal 54-281-14 Laurel 54-281-15 Portal 54-281-16 Portal 54-281-12 Portal 54-291-12 Portal 54-291-14 Portal S4-291-16 Portal 54-291-17 Portal 54-291-18 Portal 54-291-20 Portal 54-291-19 Portal 54-291-21 Portal S4-301-13 San Marcos 54-301-16 San Marcos 54-301-18 Escondido 54-301-25 San Marcos 54-301-19 Escondido 54-301-10 Escondido 54-301-21 Escondido 54-301-20 Escondido 54-301-23 Escondido 54-301-22 Escondido 54-301-24 San Marcos 54-311-47 Realito 54-301-26 San Marcos 54-301-27 San Marcos 54-311-05 Realito S4-311-40 Barranco 54-311-19 Barranco 54-311-55 Barranco 54-311-35 San Marcos 54-311-33 San Marcos 54-311-37 San Marcos 54-311-29 San Marcos 54-311-38 Barranco 54-311-16 Barranco 54-311-42 San Marcos 54-311-41 San Marcos 54-311-44 Realito 54-311-08 Realito 54-311-50 San Marcos 54-311-49 San Marcos 54-311-52 San Marcos 54-311-51 San Marcos 54-311-53 San Marcos 54-311-31 San Marcos 54-311-56 Barranco 54-311-48 San Marcos 54-311-57 Realito 54-311-45 Realito 54-321-08 Sierra Vista 54-321-10 Sierra Vista 54-321-11 Andrita 54-322-13 Sierra Vista 54-321-12 San Marcos 54-321-02 San Marcos 54-322-03 Sierra Vista 54-322-09 Monita 54-322-11 Sierra Vista 54-322-04 Sierra Vista 54-331-01 Casita 54-332-04 Casita 54-331-03 Casita 54-331-02 Casita 54-331-05 Sierra Vista 54-331-04 Sierra Vista 54-331-10 Sierra Vista 54-331-06 Sierra Vista 54-332-05 Sierra Vista 54-333-05 Sierra Vista 54-332-10 Casita 54-322-08 Casita 54-333-04 Sierra Vista 54-333-03 Sierra Vista 54-333-07 Sierra Vista 54-333-08 Sierra Vista 54-334-01 Sierra Vista 54-031-43 El Camino Rl 55-011-04 Santa Lucia 55-011-12 Cenegal 55-011-07 Cenegal 55-011-06 Cenegal 55-011-13 Cenegal 55-011-11 Cenegal 55-011-17 Santa Lucia 55-011-14 Santa Lucia 55-011-20 Santa Lucia 55-011-18 Santa Lucia 55-021-02 Santa Lucia 55-021-03 Santa Lucia 55-022-09 Santa Lucia 55-022-08 Cenegal 55-022-12 Santa Lucia 55-022-14 Santa Lucia 55-031-10 Cenegal 55-031-30 Laurel • Page 31 APNStreet AP_N.. S..ttreet.. ............. .............._................ S5-031-23 Laurel SS-031-38 Laurel SS-031-28 Cenegal 55-031-29 Cenegal SS-031-31 Cenegal SS-031-32 Cenegal 5S-031-34 Laurel SS-031-24 Laurel SS-031-37 Cenegal 55-031-27 Cenegal S5-031-39 Laurel 5S-041-10 Laurel SS-032-56 Monterey Rd S4-032-58 Monterey Rd SS-041-03 San Marcos SS-031-06 San Marcos SS-041-12 San Marcos SS-051-08 San Marcos 55-041-14 San Marcos 5S-041-13 San Marcos SS-041-15 Laurel SS-041-16 Laurel 5S-041-17 Laurel 5S-041-18 Laurel 55-OS1-02 San Marcos SS-051-11 San Marcos SS-051-12 San Marcos SS-053-01 San Marcor S5-OS2-09 Realito 55-OS2-01 Realito 55-052-10 Vista 55-052-12 Vista S5-052-13 Vista SS-052-14 Vista S5-053-02 San Marcos 55-053-06 Realito 55-053-04 Realito 55-052-03 Realito 5S-061-02 Barranco 55-061-03 Barranco 55-062-22 Lucinda 55-062-20 Lucinda 55-062-23 Lucinda 55-062-29 Lucinda 55-062-27 Lucinda 55-062-41 Lucinda 55-062-28 Lucinda 55-062-19 Lucinda 55-062-30 Lucinda 55-062-24 Lucinda 55-062-34 Lucinda 55-062-37 Lucinda 55-062-36 Barranco 55-062-35 Lucinda 55-062-38 Lucinda 55-062-43 Realito 55-062-40 Carmelita 55-071-11 San Marcos 55-062-42 Lucinda 55-062-39 Lucinda 55-062-44 Realito SS-062-31 Carmelita 55-071-13 San Marcos 55-071-15 Andrita 55-071-14 Andrita 55-071-01 Casanova 5S-072-02 Casanova 5S-072-05 Casanova 55-072-06 Andrita 55-073-02 Andrita 5S-081-01 Barranco 5S-081-02 Barranco 55-081-03 Barranco 55-081-04 Casanova 55-081-10 Casanova 55-081-11 Casanova 55-081-12 Casanova 55-081-06 Casanova 55-082-01 Andrita 55-082-07 Andrita 55-082-05 Casanova 55-082-08 Casanova 55-083-04 Casanova 55-083-05 Casanova 55-091-01 Sierra Vista 5S-091-02 Sierra Vista 55-091-03 Sierra Vista 55-092-01 Sierra Vista 55-093-02 Sierra Vista 55-093-03 Carmelita S5-101-01 Casanova 5S-101-06 Casanova S5-101-04 Carmelita 55-101-14 Carmelita SS-101-05 Carmelita 55-101-09 Casanova 55-101-12 Barranco 55-101-13 Barranco SS-101-17 Casanova 55-101-07 Casanova 55-102-01 Casanova 55-102-02 Casanova Page APN Street APNStreet _ _ .. .. ................. ._......_....................... SS-102-03 Casanova SS-101-07 Casanova S5-102-11 Casanova S5-102-06 Sierra Vista S5-111-05 San Cayetano 55-121-01 Cenegal S5-121-13 Cenegal SS-121-1S Cenegal 5S-121-18 Cenegal 5S-121-19 Cenegal 55-121-20 Cenegal 55-131-13 Cenegal 5S-131-14 Cenegal 55-141-12 Cenegal 5S-141-06 Cenegal 5S-141-05 Cenegal SS-141-07 Laurel 55-151-22 Laurel SS-151-05 San Marcos 55-161-09 San Marcos 55-151-08 San Marcos SS-151-09 San Marcos SS-151-12 Laurel SS-151-16 Laurel 5S-1S1-17 Laurel 5S-1S1-07 San Marcos SS-151-20 Laurel 55-151-13 Laurel 5S-161-03 Morro Rd 55-161-04 Morro Rd 55-161-07 Morro Rd S5-171-11 San Marcos 55-161-08 San Marcos 5S-161-10 San Marcos 55-161-11 San Marcos 5S-161-12 San Marcor 55-161-13 San Marcos 55-161-14 San Marcos 55-161-15 San Marcos 55-161-16 San Marcos 55-171-09 San Marcos 55-181-14 San Marcos 55-171-12 San Marcos 55-171-13 San Marcos 55-181-08 San Marcos 55-181-09 San Marcos 55-181-15 San Marcos 55-181-19 San Marcos 55-191-04 San Marcos 55-192-OS San Marcos 55-191-09 San Marcos 55-191-05 San Marcos 55-192-02 San Marcos 55-201-17 San Marcos 55-201-08 San Marcos 55-201-09 San Marcos 55-201-14 San Marcos 55-201-15 San Marcos 55-201-18 San Marcos 55-201-19 San Marcos 55-201-20 San Marcos 55-201-02 San Marcos 55-211-12 San Marcos 55-211-11 Morro Rd 55-221-01 Morro Rd 55-231-01 San Marcos 55-231-10 San Marcos 55-231-08 San Marcos SS-231-11 San Marcos 55-231-13 San Marcos 55-231-17 San Marcos 55-231-14 San Marcos 55-241-04 Los Altos 55-242-10 Morro Rd 55-242-04 San Marcos 55-242-32 San Marcos 55-242-06 San Marcos 55-242-34 San Marcos 55-242-14 Morro Rd 55-242-15 Morro Rd 55-242-26 Morro Rd 55-242-33 Los Altos 55-242-30 Los Altos 55-242-31 Los Altos 55-242-35 San Marcos 55-252-05 San Marcos 55-242-36 Morro Rd 55-242-29 Morro Rd 55-252-01 Morro Rd 55-252-16 Morro Rd 55-252-15 San Marcos 55-252-08 San Marcos 55-252-17 San Marcos 55-252-14 San Marcos 55-261-03 San Marcos 55-311-18 Morro Rd 55-261-04 Morro Rd 55-261-05 Morro Rd 55-261-06 Morro Rd 55-261-07 Morro Rd 55-311-08 Palo Verde 55-311-15 Palo Verde • .. Page 33 CPN Street CPN Street SS-311-10 Morro Rd S5-311-04 Palo Verde S5-311-12 Palo Verde 55-311-11 Palo Verde SS-311-17 Palo Verde SS-321-09 Morro Rd SS-331-01 Old Morro Rd SS-331-OS Old Morro Rd SS-331-12 Old Morro Rd 55--331-02 Old Morro Rd 5S-331-13 Old Morro Rd SS-331-07 Old Morro Rd SS-341-01 Old Morro Rd SS-341-02 Old Morro Rd 5S-341-03 Old Morro Rd SS-341-OS Old Morro Rd 55-341-06 Old Morro Rd S5-361-18 Palo Verde SS-361-09 Palo Verde SS-361-22 Palo Verde SS-361-19 Palo Verde SS-361-06 Palo Verde S5-421-04 San Cayetano SS-431-09 San Cayetano SS-431-03 Santa Lucia 5S-431-04 Santa Lucia S5-431-OS Santa Lucia 5S-441-01 Lomitas 55-431-12 San Cayetano 55-431-13 San Cayetano 55-441-02 Lomitas S5-441-05 Santa Lucia 55-442--01 Lomitas 55-442-02 Lomitas 55-442-03 Lomitas 55-442-04 Lomitas 55-442-05 Lomitas 55-442-06 Santa Lucia 55-442-07 Santa Lucia 55-451-12 Lomitas 55-451-09 Lomitas 55-451-10 Lomitas 55-451-11 Lomitas 55-4S1-33 Lomitas 55-451-13 Lomitas 55-451-14 Lomitas • S5-451-15 Lomitas 55-451-17 Lomitas 55-451-18 Lomitas 55-451-16 Lomitas 55-451-19 Lomitas 55-451-20 Lomitas 55-451-21 Lomitas 55-451-22 Lomitas 55-451-23 Lomitas 55-451-24 Lomitas 55-451-25 Lomitas 55-451-26 Lomitas 55-451-27 Lomitas 55-451-28 Lomitas 55-451-31 Lomitas 55-451-06 Lomitas 56-031-34 El Camino R1 54-031-35 E1 Camino R1 56-031-36 Coromar 56-301-29 Coromar 56-031-42 Coromar 56-031-31 Coromar 56-031-46 Coromar 56-041-41 Coromar S6-041-12 Coromar 56-041-26 Coromar 56-041-17 Coromar 56-041-14 Coromar 56-041-27 Coromar 56-041-23 Coromar 56-041-30 El Camino R1 56-041-29 El Camino Rl 56-041-33 Coromar 56-041-38 Coromar 56-041-36 Pajaro 56-041-37 Pajaro 56-041-40 Pajaro 56-041-39 Pajaro 56-041-45 El Camino Rl 56-041-44 El Camino Rl 56-041-47 El Camino R1 56-041-32 El Camino Rl 56-051-14 E1 Camino R1 56-051-30 El Camino R1 56-051-23 Plata Ln 56-051-49 Plata Ln 56-051-34 El Camino Rl 56-051-29 La Linia 56-051-38 E1 Camino R1 56-051-37 E1 Camino R1 • 56-051-43 Plata Ln 56-051-39 El Camino Rl 56-051-47 Plata Ln 56-051-46 Plata Ln 56-051-50 Plata Ln 56-051-51 Plata Ln Page 34 APN Street APN Street 56-071-09 El Camino R1 56-071-10 El Camino Rl 56-081-19 San Gabriel Way 56-081-20 East Front 56-081-26 El Camino R1 56-081-25 El Camino Rl 56-081-28 El Camino R1 56-081-15 El Camino R1 56-081-29 Montecito 56-081-13 Montecito 56-091-09 Curbaril 56-091-39 Curbaril 56-091-26 Coromar 56-091-36 Coromar 56-091-29 Coromar 56-091-35 Coromar 56-091-31 Curbaril 56-091-30 Coromar 56-091-37 Coromar 56-091-38 Coromar 56-091-40 Curbaril 56-091-17 Curbaril 56-091-41 Cristobal 56-091-42 Cristobal 56-091-43 Cristobal 56-091-44 Cristobal 56-101-07 Montura 56-101-17 Montura 56-101-09 Montura 56-101-50 Montura 56-101-10 Atascadero Ave 56-101-13 Atascadero Ave 56-101-11 Atascadero Ave 56-101-05 Atascadero Ave 56-101-14 Montura 56-101-12 Atascadero Ave 56-111-13 Coromar 56-111-15 Coromar 56-111-19 Coromar 56-111-20 Coromar 56-111-24 Coromar 56-111-25 Coromar 56-111-27 Coromar 56-111-23 Coromar 56-111-33 Coromar 56-111-33 Coromar 56-121-07 Coromar 56-121-28 Coromar 56-121-17 Portola 56-131-12 Portola 56-121-22 Coromar 56-121-02 Coromar 56-121-24 Coromar 56-121-23 Coromar 56-121-25 Coromar 56-121-21 Coromar 56-121-26 Coromar 56-121-33 Coromar 56-121-29 Coromar 56-121-10 Portola 56-121-31 Coromar 56-121-30 Coromar 56-121-32 Coromar 45-121-14 Coromar 56-131-13 Portola 56-131-15 Portola 56-131-18 Portola 56-131-17 Portola 56-131-19 Portola 56-141-18 Portola 56-141-05 Old Santa Rosa 56-141-06 Old Santa Rosa 56-141-11 Old Santa Rosa 56-151-34 West Front 56-141-17 Santa Rosa 56-141-08 Santa Rosa 56-151-05 San Gabriel 56-162-02 San Gabriel 56-151-27 Old Santa Roa 56-151-37 San Gabriel 56-151-29 Old Santa Rosa 56-151-31 Old Santa Rosa 56-151-36 San Gabriel 56-151-35 San Gabriel 56-151-38 San Gabriel 56-151-07 San Gabriel 56-152-13 Santa Rosa 56-261-58 Santa Rosa 56-162-04 San Gabriel 56-162-05 San Gabriel 56-162-06 San Gabriel 56-162-07 San Gabriel 56-162-09 San Gabriel 56-162-08 San Gabriel 56-162-11 San Gabriel 56-162-13 West Front 56-162-14 West Front 56-162-15 West Front 56-162-16 West Front 56-162-18 West Front 56-162-19 San Rafael 56-162-19 San Rafael • Mage 35 APfV Street APN Street ................. ............._....._...._...... 56-162-21 San Rafael 56-162-27 San Rafael 56-162-22 San Rafael 56-162-31 San Rafael 56-162-25 San Rafael 56-162-23 San Rafael 56-162-26 San Rafael 56-162-27 San Rafael 56-162-29 San Rafael 56-162-30 San Rafael 56-171-15 Marchant 56-171-16 Marchant 56-171-28 Cristobal 56-171-48 Cristobal 56-171-44 Atascadero Ave 56-171-43 Atascadero Ave 56-171-45 Atascadero Ave 56-171-46 Atascadero Ave 56-171-47 Atascadero Ave 56-181-12 Atascadero Ave 56-171-47 Cristobal 56-171-09 Marchant 56-181-08 Atascadero Ave 56-181-16 Atascadero Ave 56-181-12 Santa Rosa 56-141-16 Santa Rosa 56-181-14 Atascadero Ave 56-181-13 Atascadero Ave 56-181-15 Atasoadero Ave 56-181-03 Atascadero Ave 56-181-18 Atascadero Ave 56-181-06 Portola 56-181-21 Portola 56-181-22 Portola 56-181-23 Atascadero Ave 56-181-25 Atascadero Ave 56-181-24 Atascadero Ave 56�-181-19 Atascadero Ave 56-191-22 Portola 56-191-20 Portola 56-191-28 Portola 56-191-34 Portola 56-191-35 Portola 56-191-25 Santa Rosa 56-201-12 San Gabriel 56-201-29 San Gabriel 56201-21 Atascadero Rd 56-201-16 San Gabriel 56-201-24 Santa. Rosa 56-201-03 Santa Rosa 56-201-28 San Gabriel 56-211-10 San Gabriel 56-201-31 Santa Rosa 56-201-27 Santa Rosa 56-201-33 Santa Rosa 56-201-32 Santa Rosa 56-201-34 Atascadero Rd 56-201-35 ' Atascadero Rd 56-201-36 Atascadero Rd 56-201-10 Atascadero Rd 56-211-08 San Gabriel 56-211-47 San Gabriel 56-211-20 Atascadero Rd 56-211-22 Atascadero Rd 56-211-25 Atascadero Rd 56-211-37 Atascadero Rd 56-211-38 Atascadero Rd 56-211-41 Atascadero Rd 56-211-40 Atascadero Rd 56-211-39 Atascadero Rd 56-211-43 San Rafael 56-221-23 Atascadero Rd 56-211-44 Atascadero Rd 56-211-15 Atascadero Rd 56-211-48 Atascadero Rd 56-211-03 San Rafael 56-221-15 Marchant 56-221-14 Marchant 56-221-20 Marchant 56-221-12 Marchant 56-221-22 Marchant 56-221-23 Marchant 56-221-27 Marchant 56-221-21 Marchant 56-221-28 Atascadero Rd 56-221-25 Atasoadero Rd 56-231-03 Portola 56-231-12 Portola 56-231-08 Atascadero Rd 56-231-10 Atascadero Rd 56-231-11 Portola 56-231-10 Portola 56-231-15 Portola 56-231-18 Atascadero Rd 56-231-16 Atascadero Rd 56-231-18 Atascadero Rd • 56-231-21 Atascadero Rd 56-231-15 Atascadero Rd 56-231-22 Atascadero Rd 56-231-23 Atascadero Rd 56-241-07 Portola 56-241-09 Portola Page APN Street I P.N Street 5.6 242-06 Portola 56-242--05 Portola 56-242-07 Atascadero Rd 56-242-02 Portola 56--251-17 Atascadero Rd 56-271-10 Atascadero Rd 56-251-20 Atascadero Rd 56-251-08 Atascadero Rd 56-251-21 Atascadero Rd 56-251-19 Atascadero Rd 56--251-24 Allegre 56-251-26 Allegre 56-251-27 Allegre 56-251-30 Allegre 56-261-13 San Gabriel 56-261-67 San Gabriel 56-261--18 San Gabriel 56-261-87 San Gabriel 56-261-21 Atascadero Rd 56-261-25 San Gabriel 56-261-56 Santa Rosa 56-261-66 Santa Rosa 56-261-59 Santa Rosa 56-261-42 Santa Rosa 56-261-63 Santa Rosa 56-261-64 Santa Rosa 56-261-68 San Gabriel 56-261-11 San Gabriel 56-261-69 San Gabriel 56-261-61 San Gabriel 56-261-70 San Gabriel 56-261-71 San Gabriel 56-261-73 Santa Rosa 56-261-72 Santa Rosa 56-261-74 Santa Rosa 56-261-75 Santa Rosa 56-261-79 San Gabriel 56-261-49 San Gabriel 56-262-01 Santa Rosa 56-262-10 Santa Rosa 56-262-03 Santa Rosa 56-262-12 Santa Rosa 56-262-13 Santa Rosa 56-262-22 Santa Rosa 56-271-20 Atascadero Rd 56-271-30 San Gabriel 56-271-21 San Gabriel 56-271-33 San Gabriel 56-271-22 Marchant 56-281-21 Marchant 56-271-26 Atascadero Rd 56-271-25 Atascadero Rd 56-271-32 Atascadero Rd 56-271-11 Atascadero Rd 56-271-34 San Gabriel 56-271-35 San Gabriel 56-271-36 San Gabriel 56-281-06 Marchant 56-271-37 Atascadero Rd 56-271-31 Atascadero Rd 56-271-40 Atascadero Rd 56-271-39 Atascadero Rd 56-281-10 Marchant 56-281-11 Portola 56-291-02 Portola 56-291-07 Portola 56-291-03 Portola 56-301-06 Santa Rosa 56-•291-08 Portola 56-291-06 Portola 56-301-08 Santa Rosa 56-301-37 Santa Rosa 56-301-30 Santa Rosa 56-301-31 Santa Rosa 56-301-38 Santa Rosa 56-301-32 Santa Rosa 56-301-48 Coromar 56-301-47 Coromar 56-311-01 Mountain View 56-311-13 Mountain View 56-311-12 Mountain View 56-311-10 Mountain View 56-312-04 Mountain View 56-312-29 Mountain View 56-312-08 Lakeview 56-312-34 Lakeview 56-312-15 Lakeview 56-312-16 Lakeview 56-312-25 Mountain View 56-312-03 Mountain View 56-312-28 Mountain View 56-312-07 Lakeview 56-312-30 Lakeview 56-312-32 Lakeview 56-312-31 Lakeview 56-312-14 lakeview 56-321-17 Mountain View 56-321-10 Santa Rosa 56-322-01 Mountain View 56-322-28 Mountain Vie 56-322-10 Santa Rosa 56-322-11 Santa Rosa �PNStreet t PNStreet Page 37 _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ __ .............. 56-322-17 Lakeview 56-322-18 Lakeview 56-322-19 Lakeview 56-351-44 Santa Rosa 56-322-23 Lakeview 56-322-16 Lakeview 56-322-26 Santa Rosa 56-322-27 Santa Rosa 56-322-29 Mountain View 56-322-24 Mountain View 56-322-32 Mountain View 56-322-06 Mountain View 56-351-14 Santa Rosa 56-351-22 Santa Rosa 56-351--19 San Gabriel 56-351-24 San Gabriel 56-351-27 Santa Rosa 56-351-41 Santa Rosa 56-351-29 San Gabriel 56-351-28 San Gabriel 56--351-33 San Gabriel 56-351-35 San Gabriel 56-351-37 Santa Rosa 56-351-26 Santa Rosa 56-351-38 San Gabriel 56-351-40 San Gabriel 56-351-42 Santa Rosa 56-351-43 Santa Rosa 56-351-46 San Gabriel 56-351-48 San Gabriel 56-351-47 San Gabriel 56-351-11 San Gabriel 56-361-01 San Rafael 56-361-02 San Rafael 56-361-21 San Gabriel 56-361-24 San Gabriel 56-361-25 San Gabriel 56-361-26 San Gabriel 56-361-27 San Gabriel 56-351-18 San Gabriel 56-361-28 San Rafael 56-361-30 San Rafael 56-361-29 San Rafael 56--371-25 San Gabriel • 56-371-05 San Gabriel 56-371-06 San Gabriel 56-371-23 San Gabriel 56-371-24 San Gabriel 56-371-26 San Gabriel 56-371-37 San Gabriel 56-371-28 San Guillermo 56-371-29 San Guillermo 56-371-31 San Guillermo 56-371-30 San Gabriel 56-371-33 San Guillermo 56-371-32 San Guillermo 56-371-38 San Guillermo 56-371-35 San Guillermo 56-381-09 Catalpa 56-381-13 Catalpa 56-381-16 Catalpa 56-381-17 Catalpa 56-381-25 Catalpa 56-381-26 Catalpa 56-381-29 Catalpa 56-381-07 Ash 56-382-13 Willow Ct 56-382-26 Maple 56-383-18 Maple 56-383--13 Maple 56-383-21 El Camino Rl 56-383-23 El Camino Rl 56-383-26 Pinewood Ct 56-383-29 Pinewood Ct 56-383-34 Catalpa 56-383-32 San Rafael Ct 56-383-37 Catalpa 56-383-36 Catalpa 56-391-01 Toloso Rd 56-391-03 Toloso Rd 56-401-02 Toloso Rd 56-402-08 Toloso Rd 56-402-01 Toloso Rd 56-402-13 Toloso Rd 56-402-03 Toloso Rd 56-402-02 Toloso Rd 56-402-05 Toloso Rd 56-402-04 Toloso Rd 56-402-07 Toloso Rd 56-402-06 Toloso Rd 56-402-10 San Diego Rd 56-411-24 Toloso Rd 56-402-15 San Diego Rd 56-402-14 San Diego Rd 56-411-05 Castenada Rd 56-411-03 Castenada Rd 56-411-07 Morro Rd 56-411-25 Morro Rd 56-411-11 Castenada Rd 56-411-08 Castenada Rd 56-411-13 Los Osos Rd 56-411-'10 Castenada Rd • 0 Page 30 {CPN Street APN Street .............. ................................. ........._..... ............._._.........._..... 56-411-15 Los Osos Rd 56-411-12 Los Osos Rd 56-411-17 Toloso Rd 56-411-16 Toloso Rd 56-411-20 Toloso Rd 56-411-18 Toloso Rd 56-411--21 Castenada Rd 56-411-22 Castenada Rd 56-411-23 Toloso Rd 56-411-19 Toloso Rd 56-431-01 Casita Rd 56-431-02 Carmelita 56-431-03 Carmelita 56-432-01 Carmelita 56-432-02 Casita 56-432-03 Carmelita 56-432-04 Carmelita 56-432-05 Carmelita 56-451-02 Old Morro Rd E 56-451-01 Old Morro Rd E 56-451-04 Old Morro Rd E 56-451-03 Old Morro Rd E 56-451-05 Morro Rd 56-451-05 Old Morro Rd E 56-451-06 Old Morro Rd E 56-451-07 Old Morro Rd E 56-451-10 Old Morro Rd E 56-451-09 Old Morro Rd E 56-461-03 San Diego Rd 56-461-02 San Diego Rd 56-461-05 San Diego Rd 56-461-04 San Diego Rd 56-461-07 San Diego Rd 56-461-06 San Diego Rd 56-471-02 San Dimas 56-471-01 Toloso Rd 56-471-04 San Dimas 56-471-03 San Dimas 56-471-06 San Dimas 56-471-05 San Dimas 56-471-08 San Dimas 56-471-07 San Dimas 56-471-10 San Diego Rd 56-471-12 San Diego Rd 56-472-01 Toloso Rd 56-472-02 San Dimas • 56-472-03 San Dimas 56-472-05 San Dimas 56-481-04 Los Osos 56-481-05 Los Osos 56-481-06 San Dimas 56-481-03 San Dimas 56-481-09 San Dimas 56-481-10 San Dimas 56-491-01 Los Osos 56-491-14 Los Osos 56-491-03 San Dimas Ct 56-491-04 San Dimas Ct 56-491-05 San Rafael 56-491-06 San Rafael 56-491-07 San Dimas Ct 56-491-08 San Rafael 56-491-15 Los Osos 56-491-18 Los Osos 56-491-20 Los Osos 56-491-19 Los Osos 56-491-24 Los Osos 56-491-26 Los Osos 56-491-27 Los Osos 56-491-29 Los Osos 56-502-08 Los Osos 56-502-07 Los Osos 56-601-18 La Linia 56-051-19 La Linia 56-601-23 E1 Camino Rl 56--071-06 E1 Camino R1 56-601-24 E1 Camino R1 56-601-22 El Camino R1 56-601-26 E1 Camino R1 56-601-25 El Camino R1 56-601-28 E1 Camino R1 56-601-29 E1 Camino R1 • MEQ �;,�J II OA Z A M DAe- � v� M E M O R A N D U M TO: City Council April 25 , 1989 VIA: Ray Windsor, City Manager FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director SUBJECT: TREE REMOVAL REQUEST: 7800 BALBOA ROAD BACKGROUND : The Tree Ordinance requires that heritage trees not be removed unless approved by the City Council following public hearing. BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATIONS : As indicated in the attached site grading, drainage and tree protection plan, David Smith and Don Cannon are proposing construction of a single family home at 7800 Balboa Road. Two of • the trees proposed for removal are greater than 20 inches in diameter and, thus, require Council approval for removal . As noted in the attached arborist' s report, the site is heavily wooded and development would not be possible without the removal of some of the trees. The trees in question have been damaged in the past, probably by fire, and snow damage. As further noted, the home site lines up directly with the 20 foot access easement across the adjoining lot and the house is as close to that lot as possible making tree removal inevitable. The Tree Ordinance includes the following removal criteria: " ( iv) Obstructing existing or proposed improvements that cannot be reasonably designed to avoid the need for tree removal . " STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the removal of the heritage trees as recommended by the arborist. HE :ps Enclosures : Location Map Site Grading, Drainage and Tree Protection Plan • Tree Protection Schedule and Notes Arborist Letter dated April 17 , 1989 cc : David Smith Don Cannon 1 J f 1 16 soh NK1r W / R S i POAO i 1 G � r i RSI ; a C•p o R S J i ; R LOCATION MAP 7900 BI+LSOA ED- S / Ah i .J � y a Q � Z Isa N ' •' _ � �� .� aR� �� _ _ i.�y, I-yrs ;'�- i Y L VMS* Is LU $yy$ S 4 IR f I t6 i11s1 !� ;� 1!j ¢�� 1 °� = R\: RMA It fid uj -1 LU t � LU Vt ula i • • "• J.t tT1 a ^Z -. y..��s'..��•� i_•.¢ v+, .� µ.,iz12�yW Si .+ - - -. ._. � •„•_�� ��,. '6'•€'#f ' .�"3'a',�• 1`�•.P,,._Wiz" �.--� - Wit p+ _Jn r 7 ......... J. JJ 1 Ilk LA I � I i b � �EFZG ..!v pA!� ,!✓AG H �i>:LD L;r� GH /� P LEAD GjEi,D YI CEEp � NGi•+ Ll� 2 1 10 '/6040 Uvc- OAi�- � r � I �vr- OAC. L� F9�U7 w`tr -I 5 t 2a f i / doCD � YiH 1 EA MEtk °o c�/bOD D Li\/f; PAA1H ries PBOTNMON NOTES: 1. All existing trees are to be identified and retained 1; F unless otherwise noted. 2. No cuts, fills, construction material or equipment allowed Within the dripline of trees to be retained unless other- wise noted. 3. No branches six inches or larger in diameter, one foot 1 Eros the tree trunk shall be cut without prior approval .t of the City. , 4. Trees proposed to be removed shall be identified with a sign provided by the City and posted with a Notice of A Tres Removal permit visible from the attest. S. Temporary tree protection fences shall be instaljed at the dripline of all trees twenty feet or closer to any �/,,!/ development. eXt�/. t • -- i. Where development encroaches within the tree's driplins, 0 a tree protection fence shall be installed at the line of `y��j{! encroachment. TO �G OFD' 7. All tree protection fences shall be installed before the Commencement of any work an the site and remain in place O \ r until the dawelopmient has final approval. S. Encroachment within the driplioe of trees to be retained shall have specific dimensions and a Profile showing the extent of encroachment and tree protsctios measures. 9. All tree determinations and protection measures are to approved by the City prior to say commescemeat of work this site. 4" l,oW n t-^rll ,4«.h • ��TIF� G � JACK BRAZEAL TREE CONSULTANT WESTERN CHAPTER f_. 4531 SKIPJACK LANE �:,;�� : � 1924 M PASO ROBLES, CA 93446 _ WCISA #163. ' •�,� � (805) 227-6140 O fi April 17, 1989 CO,�ryiliyfTv � '�`���i''�i Henry Engens, Director Community Development Department P.O. Box 747 Atascadero, California 93423 RE: Tree Removals for residential site development Lot 1, Tract 1284 7800 Balboa Road Atascadero, California 93422 Dear Henry, A Certified Arborist report as required by the Atascadero City Ordinance was done, by me, at the above address in conjunction with the Architect, Frank Henderson of McCarthy, Kuentzel and Henderson, A.I.A. In the site review, it was determined that trees would need to be removed in order to develop the desired residence. Two of the trees to be removed were of heritage tree status due to the circumference or diameter as stated in the City Ordinance. I have no reservation about the removal of these two trees for the following reasons: (1) The lot is heavily forested and development would not be possible without the removal of some trees. ( 2) The trees in question are not real specimen trees for the following reasons. . . . a. Both trees are multi trunk and have co-dominant stems, which are forced apart by growth expan- sion and could become dangerous to a residence or persons in the future. b. Both trees have a large cavity at the base and appear to have been injured by fire years ago and the existing spars are in fact, second growth, thus, co-dominant stems. (cont'd) Letter to - 2 - April 17, 1989 Henry Engens • City of Atascadero C. The 21" diameter tree appears to be healthy but has suffered considerable snow damage with most of the canopy destroyed. This has resulted in a very poor specimen tree. In my opinion, this is just cause for removal of these trees. This letter was requested by the property owner/developer David Smith and Dan Cannon, through the Architect, Frank Hender- son, in hopes that this site may be approved for development in a more expedient manner. Sincerely yours, " (ZACV� Jack Brazeal Certified Arborist JB:pb . MDA I1�3EN©A� DATA TEM# ,.:..,fir. M E M O R A N D U M TO: City Council April 25 , 1989 VIA: Ray Windsor, City Manager FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director 46 SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGE 17-88 APPLICANT: Danish Care Center (Wayne Evans) LOCATION: City-wide REQUEST: To change the zoning text standards relative to "Group Quarters" BACKGROUND: On April 4, 1989, the Planning Commission conducted a public • hearing. on this zone text change request by Danish Care Center. The Commission unanimously voted to recommend approval of a change in density from 36 beds per net acre to a maximum of 55 beds per net acre as reflected in attached Ordinance No. 194 . Consideration of increased densities for skilled nursing type facilities would be by conditional use permit and require a finding that traffic generation is no more than would be generated by a multiple family project. There was brief discussion and public testimony as reflected in the attached minutes excerpt. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of Zone Change 17-88 by: 1) Approval of Ordinance No. 194 by title only 2) Approval of Ordinance No. 194 on first reading HE :ps ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance No. 194 Staff Report Dated April 4, 1989 Minutes Excerpt - April 4, 1989 • CC : MR. WAYNE EVANS ORDINANCE NO. 194 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT REGARDING MAXIMUM POPULATION DENSITY ALLOWED FOR GROUP QUARTERS ( ZC 17-88 : DANISH CARE CENTER) WHEREAS, the proposed zoning text amendment is consistent with the General Plan as required by Section 65860 of the California Government Code; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendment is in conformance with Section 65800 et seq. of the California Government Code concerning zoning regulations; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendment will not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment. The Negative Declaration prepared for the project is adequate; and WHEREAS, the Atascadero Planning Commission held a public hearing on April 4, 1989 and has recommended approval of Zone Change 17-88 . NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Atascadero does ordain as follows: Section 1 . Council Findings . 1. The proposal is consistent with the General Plan Land Use element and other elements contained in the General Plan. 2 . The proposal will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. The Negative Declaration prepared for the project is adequate. Section 2 . Zoning Text Change. Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment 17-88 is approved to change the text of the Zoning Ordinance as shown in the attached Exhibit "A" , which is made a part hereof by reference. PAGE TWO. ORDINANCE NO 194 • Section 3 . Publication. The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published once within fifteen ( 1.5 ) days after its passage in the Atascadero News, a newspaper of general circulation, printed, published, and circulated in the City in accordance with Section 36933 of the Government Code; shall certify the adopting and posting of this ordinance and shall cause this ordinance and this certification together with proof of posting to be entered into the Book of Ordinances of the City. Section 4 . Effective Date. This ordinance shall go into effect and be in full force and effect at 12 : 01 a.m. on the 31st day after its passage. On motion by and seconded by , the foregoing ordinance is hereby adopted in its entirety by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: • ABSENT: DATE ADOPTED: CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA ATTEST: BONITA BORGESON, MAYOR BOYD C. SHARITZ, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: RAY WINDSOR, City Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: JEFFREY JORGENSEN, City Attorney • PREPARED BY: HENRY ENGE , CommunllrV Dev. Director ! • • EXHIBIT "A" Section 9-3 . 175, Subsection (d) shall be amended to read as follows : (d) Group Quarters : Maximum population density for group quarters shall be as follows : Maximum Population Density Low Density Multi-Family 22 persons/net acre* Residential High Density Multi-Family 36 persons/net acre* Residential *FOR FACILITIES SUCH AS SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES WHERE RESIDENTS ARE PRIMARILY NONAMBULATORY, THE FOLLOWING MAXIMUM BED/NET ACRE DENSITIES MAY BE PERMITTED, SUBJECT TO PLANNING COMMISSION CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPROVAL: RMF-10 DISTRICT - THIRTY-FOUR (34) BEDS PER NET ACRE RMF-16 DISTRICT - FIFTY-FIVE (55) BEDS PER NET ACRE SUCH APPROVAL SHALL REQUIRE A FINDING THAT THE AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC GENERATED BY THE PROJECT WOULD NOT EXCEED THAT OF A MULTI-FAMILY PROJECT. THE PROJECT WOULD BE FURTHER SUBJECT TO THE "PERCENT COVERAGE" CONSTRAINTS OF SECTION 9-3 . 176 (a) OF THE DISTRICT. OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS WOULD BE AS ESTABLISHED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION. CITY OF ATASCADERO Item: B . 2 STAFF REPORT FOR: Planning Commission Meeting Date April 4 , 1989 BY: Henry Engen File No: ZC 17-88 SUBJECT• Consideration of a request by the Danish Care Center to change the zoning text standards relative to "Group Quarters" to allow for a skilled nursing facility to increase their density from 36 beds per net acre to 60 beds per net acre. BACKGROUND: As indicated in the attached staff report to the City Council, the Danish Care Center is seeking to expand their 64 bed • facilities by the addition of 12 beds to the skilled nursing facility plus a 24 bed residential care facility. This request was approved by the City council for consideration following review of the attached January 17, 1989 report to the City Council . ANALYSIS: under Section 9-3 . 175 of the Zoning Ordinance, allowable densities for "Group Quarters" are provided for as follows : MAXIMUM POPULATION DENSITY Low Density Multiple. . . . . . . . . . . 22 persons/net acre Family Residential High Density Multiple. . . . . . . . . .36 persons/net acre Family Residential This standard was added as part of the comprehensive rewrite of the Multi-Family Density standards to provide an approximate equivalent population density standard for non-conventional housing arrangements in the multi-family zone. In considering the situation with a use such as the Danish Care Center, it would be reasonable to allow increases in density given the non-ambulatory nature of the residents of the facility. Further, this type of use requires less parking than board and care, fraternity house, sorority house, or other types of group quarters . Hence, increases in population coupled with decreases in parking needs would support the logic of permitting adjustments in density above the current maximums, both for the RMF/16 and for the RMF/10 zones . Density increases might best be considered in relation to the traffic generating characteristics of group quarters . The Institute of Traffic Engineers provides us with the following average daily traffic standards : USE AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC Multiple Family 6 . 1 trips per dwelling Nursing Home 2 .7 trips per bed In reviewing standards in other county communities, the City of San Luis Obispo does have persons per net acre density standards for group housing that allows up to 55 persons per net acre in their high density multi-family and selected commercial districts . It should be noted, however, that the high density multi-family zone in this college community allows up to 24 dwelling units per net acre, as compared to our high of 16 per net acre. With conditional use permit review, it would be possible to consider appropriate maximum density based on the traffic generating characteristics of the proposed use and in this regard it would be suggested that the applicant submit a traffic engineering analysis of the expected traffic volumns as compared to what the normal multi-family development would generate to justify density increases . This same analysis could provide the basis for providing relief from the literal parking standards of the multi-family zone and its permitted uses . Group quarters, for example, require one parking space per bed. Clearly, in a non-ambulatory situation this is excessive. RECOMMENDATION: Following review and discussion, recommend to the City Council approval of the attached draft ordinance to enable consideration of higher population densities per acre for uses such as nursing homes . HE:ph cc : Mr. Wayne Evans Encls: January 17 , 1989 - Report to the City Council Draft ordinance 1 GAT li ,1 iTEIM j MEMORANDUM • TO: City Council VIA: Ray Windsor, City Manager Henry Engen, Community Development Director iw� FROM: Steven L. DeCamp, Senior Planner DATE: January 17, 1989 RE: Request for initiation of Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment - Danish Care Center SUBJECT: The Danish Care Center has submitted a letter requesting an amendment to the text of the Zoning Ordinance to increase the density allowed at their facility on south E1 Camino Real from 36 beds/net acre to 60 beds/net acre. The applicant believes that increasing demand for their services warrants such a change and • that the increased density can be adequately accommodated at their current location. BACKGROUND: Provisions for modification of the City's Zoning Ordinance text are contained in Section 9-1. 114. This section states that text amendments may be initiated by: " (1) The City Council or Planning Commission upon its own motion ; or (2) The City Council of Planning Commission upon acceptance of a request from any interested party, including the Planning Director. Requests shall be in writing and shall include a description of the benefit to be derived as a result of the text amendment. " ANALYSIS: Density standards for "group quarters" (skilled nursing and residential care facilities) are contained within the Residential Multiple Family density standards in Section 9-3. 175 of the Zoning Ordinance. Allowable densities for group quarters are • based on "Persons/Net Acre" as opposed to "Dwelling Units/Net Acre" as is used to determine allowable densities for multiple • i family projects. Group quarters are allowed 22 persons per net acre in the Low Density Multiple Family Residential Zones and up • to 36 persons per net acre in the High Density Multiple Family Residential Zones. These density standards were established in 1987 by Ordinance #149 (Zone Change 3-87) . The density standards applied to group quarters are based, in part, on the number of persons per acre anticipated with standard multiple family developments. Some additional density is allowed because of the reduced number of parking spaces required and differences in site coverage occurring with group quarters. In some cases, it may be appropriate to allow higher densities in group homes than is currently permitted, if all other standards can be met. It may also be appropriate to differentiate between ambulatory and non-ambulatory populations in determining allowable densities. Finally, it may be appropriate to provide for consideration of modifications to the density standards through a Conditional Use Permit. Given the complex nature of the problems related to the location and density of group quarters and other facilities, and the obvious need to make provisions for an increasingly elderly population, staff believes a review of the Zoning Ordinance' s provisions for group quarters is appropriate. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council initiate, for review and consideration, a Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment relative to the residential density and development standards for group quarters. cc: Wayne A. Evans, Care Center Consultants Attachments: 1. December 22, 1988 letter from Care Center Consultants (Danish Care Center, Inc. ) 2. Zoning Ordinance Excerpt 2 ATTACHMENT • CARE CENTER CONSULTANTS Consulting and Management of Health Care Operations SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES CABRILLO CARE December 22 , 1988 CENTER. INC. 3033 Augusta Street San Luis Obispo California 93401 CANOGA CARE Mr . Steve DeCamp CENTER. INC. The City of Atascadero .�rj iCr 22029 Saticoy Street 6500 Palma D E V w : 9,2 3 Canoga Park California 91304 Atascadero , CA 93422 DANVILLE CARE Dear Mr . D e C a m p : CENTER. INC. 336 Diablo Rd. We are hereby requesting a change in the zoning Danville text which will allow us to expand our skilled nursing California 94526 P g facility by 14 needed beds and 24 residential care beds . DANISH CARE This will allow us to properly service the increased CENTER, INC. community needs for long term care accommodations so P.O. BOX 1749 that the residents in turn won ' t have to go outside the Atascadero community in which they live to obtain such services . California 93423 The need for such services is increasing on a BALOWEN monthly basis and unless steps are taken immediately , CARE CENTER 16955 Vanowen Street we foresee a crisis in the future . This is evidenced Van Nuys by numerous articles written in many magazines and California 91406 newspapers today . RESIDENTIAL The zoning text changes we are requesting is in CARE line with other cities throughout the state . FACILITIES TAMARACK MANOR If you have any further questions , please contact 336 Diablo Rd. me . Danville California 94526 Very truly yours , LAUREL CARE CENTER. Inc. CARE CENTER CONSULTANTS 700 Laurel Ave. Oakdale California 95361 by CL)),.�— %L .�.., Wayne A. Evans • 2501 W. Shaw Ave., Suite 122, Fresno, CA 93711 (209) 226.2449 ADOPTED JUNE 27 , 1983 ' ( ATTACHMENT 2 ! (h) Bed and Breakfast (i) Skilled Nursing Facility (See Section 9-6 . 134) (j) The following uses where established in a residential structure of historical importance: (1) Broadcasting Studios _ (2) Business Support Services (3) Libraries and museums (4) Offices (5) Personal Services (6) School-business and vocational 9-3. 174. Lot Size: The minimum lot size in the Residential Mul- tiple Family Zone shall be one-half acre. Smaller lot sizes may be allowed for planned residential developments, including condominiums and mobilehome developments, provided that the overall density within the project conforms with Section 9-3.175 (Density) . 9-3. 175 . Density: The maximum allowable density in the Residen- tial Multiple Family Zone shall be designated on the Official Zoning Maps as provided by Section 9-3.104 (c) and be established in accord- ance with the General Plan as follows: (a) Areas Designated Low Density Multiple Family Residential : The maximum number of dwelling units per net acre is as follows : Number Of Dwelling Bedrooms Units/Acre 1 10.0 2 7.5 3 5 .0 4+ 3.8 (b) Areas Designated High Density Multiple Family Residential: The maximum number of dwelling units per net acre is as follows : Number Of Dwelling Bedrooms Units/Acre 1 16 2 12 3 8 3-20 ADOPTED JUNE 27, 198JO • (c) Hillside Densitv Standards: The maximum densities permitted y Subsections a an (7)-above , shall be modified to the following maximums based on site topography, as follows : Average Low Densitv Multiple Family High Densitv Multiple Familv Slone BRP, 3BR 4BR+ iBR 2BR 3BR 4BR+ 0-10% 10 7.50 5 .0 3 .80 16 12.0 8.0 6 .0 11-150 7 5 .25 3 .5 2.66 12 8.4 5 .6 4.2 16-20% 5 3 . 75 2.5 1.90 8 5 . 6 3.7 2 . 8 21-25% 3 2.75 les 1. 14 6 4.2 2,8 2 . 1 26-30% 2 1.50 1.0 0. 75 4 2.8 1.8 1.4 31%+UP 1 0. 75 0.5 0.38 2 1.4 0.9 U . 7 (d) Group Quarters : The maximum population density for group quarters shall be as follows : Maximum Population Density Low Density Multiple 22 Persons/Net Acre Family Residential High Density Multiple 36 Persons/Net Acre Family • (e) Sewer Service: Sewer service and the inclusion of property within t e ur an services line (USL) shall be a prerequisite to developing multiple family projects to the density stan- dards of the RMF Zone. RMF-Zoned properties outside of the Urban Standards Areas shall develop in accordance with the standards of the RS Residential Suburban District. (f) Density Bonus : A density bonus of up to 25% may be granted through Con-d-itional Use Permit approval in exchange for pro- vision of affordable housing to low and moderate income per- sons . In lieu of granting a density bonus , the Planning Commission shall consider other bonus incentives allowable under Government Code Section 65915 . 9-3 . 176 . Property Development Standards. In addition to the stand- arcrmss specifies in Chapter 4, General Site and Development Standards , the following development standards shall apply to Mobile Home and Multiple Family Residential projects : (a) Percent Coverage. The maximum percent of a lot that may be covered y structures (excluding decks less than -10 inches from the ground) shall be 40% for Low Density Multiple Fam- ily projects and 50% for High Density Multiple Family pro- jects . (b) Enclosed Storage. Each dwelling unit shall be provided a minimum ofO1 0 square feet of enclosed storage space, exclu- sive of closets , which may be located in either a principal or accessory building. 3-21 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT REGARDING MAXIMUM POPULATION DENSITY ALLOWED FOR GROUP QUARTERS ( ZC 17-88 : DANISH CARE CENTER) WHEREAS, the proposed zoning text amendment is consistent with the General Plan as required by Section 65860 of the California Government Code; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendment is in conformance with Section 65800 et seq. of the California Government Code concerning zoning regulations; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendment will not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment. The Negative Declaration prepared for the project is adequate; and WHEREAS, the Atascadero Planning Commission held a public hearing on April 4, 1989 and has recommended approval of Zone Change 17-88 . NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Atascadero does ordain as follows : Section 1 . Council Findings . 1 . The proposal is consistent with the General Plan Land Use element and other elements contained in the General Plan. 2 . The proposal will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. The Negative Declaration prepared for the project is adequate. Section 2 . Zoning Text Change. Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment 17-88 is approved to change the text of the Zoning Ordinance as shown in the attached Exhibit All , which is made a part hereof by reference. • Section 3 . Publication. The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published once within fifteen ( 15 ) days after its passage in the Atascadero News , a newspaper of general circulation, printed, published, and circulated in the City in accordance with Section 36933 of the Government Code; shall certify the adopting and posting of this ordinance and shall cause this ordinance and this certification together with proof of posting to be entered into the Book of Ordinances of the City. Section 4 . Effective Date. This ordinance shall go into effect and be in full force and effect at 12 : 01 a.m. on the 31st day after its passage. On motion by and seconded by , the foregoing ordinance is hereby adopted in its entirety by the following roll call vote: AYES : NOES : • ABSENT: DATE ADOPTED: CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA ATTEST: BONITA BORGESON, MAYOR BOYD C. SHARITZ, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: RAY WINDSOR, City Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: JEFFREY JORGENSEN, City Attorney . PREPARED BY: HENRY ENGEN, Community Dev. Erector EXHIBIT "A" • Section 9-3 . 175 , Subsection (d) shall be amended to read as follows : (d) Group Quarters : Maximum population density for group quarters shall be as follows: Maximum Population Density Low Density Multi-Family 22 persons/net acre* Residential High Density Multi-Family 36 persons/net acre* Residential *FOR FACILITIES SUCH AS SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES WHERE RESIDENTS ARE PRIMARILY NONAMBULATORY, THE FOLLOWING MAXIMUM BED/NET ACRE DENSITIES MAY BE PERMITTED, SUBJECT TO PLANNING COMMISSION CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPROVAL: RMF-10 DISTRICT - THIRTY-FOUR (34) BEDS PER NET ACRE RMF-16 DISTRICT - FIFTY-FIVE (55) BEDS PER NET ACRE SUCH APPROVAL SHALL REQUIRE A FINDING THAT THE AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC GENERATED BY THE PROJECT WOULD NOT EXCEED THAT OF A MULTI-FAMILY PROJECT. THE PROJECT WOULD BE FURTHER SUBJECT TO THE "PERCENT COVERAGE" CONSTRAINTS OF SECTION 9-3 . 176 (a) OF THE DISTRICT. OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS WOULD BE AS ESTABLISHED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION. • MINUTES EXCERPT - LANNING COMMISSION - 4/4/8 • 2. ZONE CHANGE 17-88 : Request submitted by the Danish Care Center to change the zoning text standards relative to "Group Quarters" to allow for a skilled nursing facility to increase their density from 36 beds/net acre to 60 beds/net \ acre. Henry Engen presented the staff report on this request. Staff is recommending an increase of up to 55 beds per net acre for non-ambulatory patients . Commission questions and discussion relative to traffic impacts, maximum employee vehicles in parking area with shift overlaps , density bonus options and the difference between board and care facilities and skilled nursing facilities followed. Commissioner Highland offered that he • has been going to Danish Convalescent Center for 30 years and has never seen the parking lot over 3/4 full . Don Spenhoff, design consultant for Danish Care Centers , spoke in support of an increase to 60 beds, but indicated they would accept a 55 bed per net acre standard. Celia Moss spoke in support of the request noting that patients are being located in other areas outside SLO County which makes it difficult to maintain contact with relatives and friends . Skilled nursing facilities, in terms of space requirements for patients, were more similar to hospitals than board and care facilities . MOTION: Made by Commissioner Highland and seconded by Com- missioner Waage to recommend approval of the draft ordinance to enable consideration of higher popu- lation densities per acre for uses such as nursing homes . The motion carried 7 :0 . EETM_7 AGEIIDA , ITEM e DMA .,. M E M O R A N D U M � TO: City Council April 25 , 1989 VIA: Ray Windsor, City Manager FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director , SUBJECT: ROAD ABANDONMENT 1-89 LOCATION: Portion of Sausilito Road APPLICANT: 1st Nationwide Network Mortgage Co. /Gordon Davis (Volbrecht Surveys) REQUEST: To abandon (vacate) a portion of Sausilito Road RECOMMENDATION: • Approve the abandonment of a portion of Sausilito Road by adopt- ing Resolution No. 22-89 . BACKGROUND : On April 4, 1989 , a public hearing was conducted by the Planning Commission on this matter with the Commission unanimously recommending approval of the road abandonment. This action satisfies a condition of a recently approved tentative parcel map and does not affect circulation in the area. In that Sausilito Road has never been constructed and no existing utilities will be affected by the abandonment, this is a summary (or short form) vacation. This procedure does not require the adoption of a separate Resolution of Intent to Vacate. Alan Volbrecht with Volbrecht Surveys , representing the appli- cant,poice`-rn su port of the request. There was no other public comment. HE :ps Attachments : Resolution No. 22-89 Staff Report Dated April 4 , 1989 • cc: 1st Nationwide Network Mortgage Co. Gordon Davis Volbrecht Surveys • RESOLUTION NO. 22=89 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO SUMMARILY VACATING A PORTION OF A ROAD PURSUANT TO STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE; PART 3 , PUBLIC STREETS, HIGHWAYS AND SERVICE EASEMENTS VACATION LAW; CHAPTER 4 , SUMMARY VACATION; 8333 (BEING A PORTION OF SAUSILITO RD. ) WHEREAS, Streets and Highways Code 8330 permits summary vacation of a street or highway by adoption of a resolution of summary vacation; and WHEREAS, this portion of Sausilito Road, as shown on the attached Exhibit, has been determined to be actually superseded by relocation and has been impassable for vehicular travel for at least five consecutive years and no public money was expended for its maintenance during that time; and WHEREAS, the vacation of this portion of Sausilito Road, now superseded by relocation will not work to cut off access to any person' s property which, prior to relocation, adjoined the street or highway to be vacated; and WHEREAS, the vacation of this portion of Sausilito Road will not affect any in-place, in-use public utility facility or will not terminate a public service easement; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code 65402, the City Planning Commission has recommended to the Council its ' finding that vacation of this portion of Sausilito Road is in conformance with the City' s General Plan; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Streets and Highways Code 2381, the City Planning Commission has recommended to the Council its' finding that this portion of Sausilito Road is not suitable or useful as a non-motorized transportation facility. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved as follows : 1 . Based upon the above findings, the Council now finds and declares the above-described road portion superseded by relocation to be unuseable as a non-motorized transportation facility. 2. Based upon the above findings, the Council now finds and declares the proposed vacation of this road portion superseded by relocation to be in conformance with the City' s General Plan. • Resolution No. 22-89 Page Two 3 . The Council now summarily vacates, pursuant to Streets and Highways Code, Part 3, Chapter 4 , 8330, that portion of Sausilito Road shown on attached Exhibit, subject to the following conditions of approval : (a) The property owner shall indemnify and "hold harmless" the City from claims that may arise from the abandonment procedure. This agreement shall be reviewed and found acceptable by the City Attorney. (b) A lot merger shall be completed prior to or simultaneously to the recording of the abandonment resolution. (c) Applicant shall obtain fee title to Sausilito Road. (d) All conditions of approval must be completed prior to or simultaneously to the recording of the abandonment resolution. 4 . That from and after the date this resolution is recorded with the County Recorder, the road portion shown on the attached Exhibit shall no longer be or constitute a street or highway. 5 . The City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this Resolution of Summary Vacation, attested by him/her under seal, to be recorded without acknowledgment, certificate of acknowledgment, or further proof in the office of the County Recorder. On motion by and seconded by the motion was approved by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: DATE ADOPTED: By: BONITA BORGESON, Mayor City of Atascadero, California Resolution No. 22-89 Page Three ATTEST: BOYD C. SHARITZ, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: RAY WINDSOR, City Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: • JEFFREY G. JORGENSEN City Attorney PREPARED BY: 2avl-- HENRY ENGEJN Community evelop nt Director • i ,:;"_. �_ ._'`• � -- EXHIBIT RA C1-89 RESOLUTION NO. 22-890 M OGl/NG-R GOI?,001fl T. L�4V -f LOT 8 LOT 4 G . ROAD ollltleR �,9iQC�t 3 GORDo�r T. D,91/rs PROPOSE.) t��/7 Cr� � Adr?NOGNME,��T • CITY OF ATASCADERO Item:-B . 1 STAFF REPORT FOR: Planning Commission Meeting Date: April 4, 1989 BY: Doug Davidson, Associate Planner File No: RA- 01-89 SUBJECT: Consideration of a request to abandon a portion of the Sausilito Rd. right-of-way. A. SITUATION AND FACTS: 1. Applicant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .First Nationwide Mortage Co. Gordon Davis 2. Representative. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Volbrecht Surveys 3. Project Address. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12405 Santa Ana Rd. 10 4. Legal Description. . . . . . . . . . . .Parcels 3 and 4, P.M. 43-71 Atascadero Colony 5. Site Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13. 49 acres 6. Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .RS 7. General Plan Designation. . . . .Suburban Residential 8. Existing Use. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Vacant 9. Environmental Status. . . . . . . . .Negative Declaration posted March 23, 1989 B. ANALYSIS: The applicant is requesting the abandonment of a portion of the Sausilito Rd. right-of-way (see attached maps) . Tentative Parcel Map 16-88 (Exhibit F) was approved by the City Council on December 13, 1988 on the condition that Sausilito Rd. be built to City standards or abandoned as a right-of-way. Prior to adopting a Resolution to Vacate, the City must be certain that the right-of-way is not necessary for future road purposes and that the abandonment will not interfere with the present or future provision of utility services. Staff has received approvals of this request from all the affected public utilities and City departments. Santa Ana Rd. provides adequate access to these parcels and Sausilito Rd. is not necessary for • future circulation in the area. Furthermore, the abandonment does not cut off future access to other property in the area. Road abandonments are accomplished by resolution of the City Council. The procedure is governed by the Street and Highways Code, under which the Planning Commission must make the following two findings: 1. That the abandonment is in conformance with the City' s General Plan. 2. That the right-of-way is unsuited as a non-motorized transportation facility, i.e. primarily for the use of pedestrians, bicyclists, or equestrians. Both of these findings can clearly be made. Under the Street and Highways Code this application qualifies as a Summary Vacation (short form) , as opposed to the General (long form) procedure. If the road has not been constructed and there are no existing utilities in the right-of-way, a Summary procedure is the proper course. This does not require the preparation of a notice of intent to abandon. When a road is abandoned, one-half of the right-of-way reverts to each of the adjacent property owners. In this case, each of the the two property owners will have to obtain fee title to one - half of the abandoned right-of-way and merge the resultant lots. C. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission make the Findings in Exhibit G and recommend to the City Council that the right-of- way be abandoned. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A - Location Map Exhibit B - Assessor' s Parcel Map Exhibit C - Development Statement Exhibit D - Proposed Abandonment Exhibit E - Prior Lot Line Adjustment (Recorded) Exhibit F - Tentative Parcel Map 16-88 Exhibit G - Findings for Approval Exhibit H - Draft Resolution Exhibit A 5 Location Map C_, D-PyO RA 01-89 • ,R S W � a A SITE: 12405 Santa Ana Road TPM 16-88 I f R S R Sl" / RS ((F 1 -- ' ' QRS ' PORTION OP SAU&I L ITO RD ' TO BE A B prM OD Al ED R - 0060 L( H} R S / Exhibit B ;r;�� . ;� T Assessor ' s_ Parcel Map -:.. CIT`! -aTA-S C A D E1,0 -89 RA 01 �.�ucwF��•; — C� .,I.,,I �.IVI�z :7 _.. % LJC'!�t .i ' ITN. CITY OF ATASCADERO Fr q N 67 L�a 1.41 AC. N P� 3. '�-o s >. >. ' 108 6 2115 AG. ?�, i�- •, v Q�^�> P�RTtON :� F SAiJ511 I7D ,�i). \ , r T ,{'. .• 'q A' O q. 7.99 AC.) s: (2) ,a c A 184AC. c K, h0h 3 nA 8 �.^ fi57^C, a� e °� D� �5 � o Fr.4, R1 an; Z R` Fr. 44 ,0 y 10 • 7.12 AG. ' 0 0 1C.02AC. s °' EXhlblt C: Development Statement Ibrecht RA 0I-89 SURVEYS 7508 Morro Rd. • Atascadero, CA 93422 • 805/466-9296 December 15, 1988 I City of Atascadero Community Development Department IRE: Parcel Map AT87-315 i Enclosed is an application to abandon a portion of Sausilito Road. The portion to be abandoned is within Parcels 3 and 4 of Lot Line Adjustment ATAL87-314. Parcel 4 is the last lot requiring access 1from Sausilito Road and the location of the existing right-of-way lis such that the road would be impractical to build. IThis road abandonment is being requested as suggested by the City lof Atascadero in connection with Parcel Map At87-315. If you have any questions or concerns please contact our office. Sincerely, a, C Alan L. Volbrecht L.S.5201 (exp.6-30-88) ?ail, Surveying - Land Planning Exhibit D T"^'/ Proposed Abandonment C1 L F A 1_-�S C A D ETZO ,. .., ._- .,-•--�, RA 01-89 -,yucwF��•� — C�,.1.•1 ?.. II<"i" :� c i.`L L P.1�1��I� OGU�!/ER °wti61e 601WON T 4019111S L oT 8 I 44/ ` G `r'rirp ROAD OlT/�UER . P.9iQC C 3 o:UwC-.P CiORDON T. ja4YIS PROPOSE �A�CLC` ¢ ABANDONMENT LIJ A Exhibit E Prior Lot Line Adjustment 11 Y O�� ��i SSC. DRO _ �. ... _ RA 01-89 n^r.-. e^ 1:241 L �G �� 'r P � RMarl x / ,rtr !Zf or Arr p s. i •y. . i M t,foto PA,fCE14 } S' t J./ fc rev fez lIrlw7 I y • ti tf� s�'•s . ernrr\r.t�• Exhibit F _ TPM 11-88 Ty c 1 C�.DEIRO i � �� RA o1-89 TENTAT/YE�.4R!'fl:tlAPAlB1•.,/S . - •'i�, • rwr.•n�Iw9Mv0/wwu Nir.wi)rr. r rri4 N w•aG•Mi•o•»,�•n•r ar n+r N • ,rrRirw, rte/,/tw ae wir•tAMN AM \, •-��• od�'""'• ' OW!/E.PS CEn'T/f/LATE _..►fir .•••X ,ter} :..•..!•`..;�� '•.; �' • crap O.:Ip Mf.rw0••N Y•InrMw►M�f •rY"SN✓Mfb✓Grr.10 A9MMW 'A 41AA00 N.• •4T � // • J1MI/.+//.wlA�r AlNlq llOnVr✓NAINY/ Ally/ 1107, .arsv.rmw~sr.vlr,sarisvrw .� •.�.'fs+ _L•t A; : ;f / s:- ;P•/lttt?.• . -ixtilal� :� �.iict..i::� of '•...:� .\: �\�—�v�'t't �—i I 1 �,.. ..... .j• Y/l/N/TY MAP_ ... Lei / 'IIS: t 4i�; .w. •i �r I l ie•��%:' _� wsw ria.�Js�#��`\ '\\��/T � r `l:, �� u.• i - rrwrart rt. wars /`sa..�sl •• wr....irrtt.Rle•awsaati /�A�M Q/NY nrl•N IwA•MI P AW4 wW1 s•.rwr W~ WC 7a1•nw w savra a%o v000 www=�""""' a • Exhibit G - Findings for Approval Road Abandonment 01-89 - Sausilito Rd. 12405 Santa Ana Rd. (First Nationwide Network Mortage Co. /Volbrecht Surveys) ENVIRONMENTAL FINDING: The proposed project will not have a significant adverse effect upon the environment. The Negative Declaration prepared for the project is adequate. PROJECT FINDINGS: 1. The proposed abandonment is consistent with the General Plan. 2. The right-of-way is unsuited for development as a non- motorized transportation facility, i.e. primarily for the use of pedestrians, bicyclists, or equestrians. 3. The right-of-way is not necessary for future road purposes, • as adequate access is provided by Santa Ana Rd. 4. The proposed abandonment will not affect any existing utilities and adequate utility easements have been retained. EXHIBIT "H" RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO SUMMARILY VACATING A PORTION OF A ROAD PURSUANT TO STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE; PART 3 , PUBLIC STREETS, HIGHWAYS AND SERVICE EASEMENTS VACATION LAW; CHAPTER 41 SUMMARY VACATION; 8333 (BEING A PORTION OF SAUSILITO RD. ) WHEREAS, Streets and Highways Code 8330 permits summary vacation of a street or highway by adoption of a resolution of summary vacation; and WHEREAS, this portion of Sausilito Road, as shown on the attached Exhibit, has been determined to be actually superseded by relocation and has been impassable for vehicular travel for at least five consecutive years and no public money was expended for • its maintenance during that time; and WHEREAS, the vacation of this portion of Sausilito Road, now superseded by relocation will not work to cut off access to any person' s property which, prior to relocation, adjoined the street or highway to be vacated; and WHEREAS, the vacation of this portion of Sausilito Road will not affect any in-place, in-use public utility facility or will not terminate a public service easement; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code 65402, the City Planning Commission has recommended to the Council its ' finding that vacation of this portion of Sausilito Road is in conformance with the City' s General Plan; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Streets and Highways Code 2381, the City Planning Commission has recommended to the Council its ' finding that this portion of Sausilito Road is not suitable or useful as a non-motorized transportation facility. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved as follows: 1 . Based upon the above findings, the Council now finds and declares the above-described road portion superseded by relocation to be unuseable as a non-motorized transportation • facility. 2-. "-,Based upon the above findings, the Council now finds and declares the proposed vacation of this road portion superseded by relocation to be in conformance with the City' s General Plan. • Resolution No. Page Two 3 . The Council now summarily vacates , pursuant to Streets and Highways Code, Part 3 , Chapter 4, 8330 , that portion of Sausilito Road shown on attached Exhibit, subject to the following conditions of approval : (a) The property owner shall indemnify and "hold harmless" the City from claims that may arise from the abandonment procedure. This agreement shall be reviewed and found acceptable by the City Attorney. (b) A lot merger shall be completed prior to or simultaneously to the recording of the abandonment resolution. (c) Applicant shall obtain fee title to Sausilito Road. • (d) All conditions of approval must be completed prior to or simultaneously to the recording of the abandonment resolution. 4 . That from and after the date this resolution is recorded with the County Recorder, the road portion shown on the attached Exhibit shall no longer be or constitute a street or highway. 5 . The City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this Resolution of summary Vacation, attested by him/her under seal, to be recorded without acknowledgment, certificate of acknowledgment, or further proof in the office of the County Recorder. On motion by and seconded by the motion was approved by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ® DATE ADOPTED: By: BONITA BORGESON, Mayor City of Atascadero, California • Resolution No. Page Three ATTEST: BOYD C. SHARITZ, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: RAY WINDSOR, City Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: JEFFREY G. JORGENSEN r City Attorney PREPARED BY: HENRY ENGEN Community Development Director *DRAFT RESOLUTION EXHIBIT o�Uw<<Z T. D 1,f LOT 4' Z07' 8 ROAD • f��sT it/�lrOr�r�rr/>c�" oa�i�2 PA�CFL � AddNOGNME,1/T •. �=1 rr1 � �` r ��r SGrGfr/"=/QO' ME's#' AGENt3A��� aAT��ITEMt M E M O R A N D U M TO: City Council April 25 , 1989 VIA: Ray Windsor, City Manager FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director • SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION ORDINANCE BACKGROUND : At its April 4 , 1989 meeting, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the above-referenced subject. This is a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) mandated ordinance required to maintain eligibility for the National Flood Insurance Program. The Commission unanimously voted to recommend that the City Council adopt the Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance ( see attached staff report) . No public testimony was received. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance by: 1 ) Approval of Ordinance No. 193 by title only 2) Approval of Ordinance No. 193 on first reading HE :ps Attachments : Ordinance No. 193 Staff Report - April 4 , 1989 • 0 • ORDINANCE NO. 193 AN ORDINANCE ADDING CHAPTER 2 TO ARTICLE 7 OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION Section 1. Text SEC. 7-2.100 - FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION This Ordinance is enacted to protect the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Atascadero and their property and to meet the requirements of state and federal legislation. SEC. 7-2.101 STATUTORY AUTHORIZATION The Legislature of the State of California has in Government Code Sections 65302, 65560 and 65800 conferred upon local government units authority to adopt regulations designed to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare of its citizenry. Therefore, the City Council of the City of Atascadero does ordain as follows: • SEC. 7-2.102. - FINDING OF FACT A. The flood hazard areas of- the City of Atascadero are subject to periodic inundation which results in loss of life and property, health and safety hazards, disruption of commerce and governmental services, extraordinary public expenditures for flood protection and relief, and impairment of the tax base, all of which adversely affect the public health, safety and general welfare. B. These flood losses are caused by the cumulative effect of obstructions in areas of special flood hazards which increase flood heights and velocities, and when inadequately anchored, damage uses in other areas. Uses that are inadequately flood-proofed, elevated or otherwise protected from flood damage also contribute to the flood loss. SEC. 7-2.103 - STATEMENT OF PURPOSE It is the purpose of this ordinance to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare, and to minimize public and private losses due to flood conditions in specific areas by provisions designed: A. To protect human life and health; B. To minimize expenditure of public money for costly flood 1 control projects; • C. To minimize the need for rescue and relief efforts associa- ted with flooding and generally undertaken at the expense of the general public; D. To minimize prolonged business interruptions; E. To minimize damage to public facilities and utilities such as water and gas mains, electric, telephone and sewer lines, streets and bridges located in areas of special flood hazard F. To help maintain a stable tax base by providing for the second use and development of areas of special flood hazard so as to minimize future flood blight areas; G. To insure that potential buyers are notified that property is in an area of special flood hazard; and H. To insure that those who occupy the areas of special flood hazard assume responsibility for their actions. SEC. 7-2.104 - METHODS OF REDUCING FLOOD LOSSES In order to accomplish its purposes, this ordinance includes methods and provisions for: • A. Restricting or prohibiting uses which are dangerous to health, safety, and property due to water or erosion hazards, or which result in damaging increases in erosion or flood heights or velocities; B. Requiring that uses vulnerable to floods, including facilities which serve such uses, be protected against flood damage at the time of initial construction; C. Controlling the alterations of natural floodplains, stream channels, and natural protective barriers, which help accommodate or channel flood waters; D. Controlling filling, grading, dredging, and other develop- ment which may increase flood damage; and E. Preventing or regulating the construction of flood barriers which will unnaturally divert flood waters or which may increase flood hazards in other areas. SEC. 7-2.200 - DEFINITIONS Unless specifically defined below, words or phrases used in this ordinance shall be interpreted so as to give them the meaning they have in common usage and to give this ordinance its most 2 • reasonable application. A. "Appeal" means a review of the Floodplain Administrator' s interpretation of any provision of this ordinance or a request for standards modification. B. "Area of shallow flooding" means a designated AO, or AH zone on the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) . The base flood depths range from one to three feet; a clearly defined channel does not exist; the path of flooding is unpredictable and indeterminate; and velocity flow may be evident. C. "Area of special flood-related erosion hazard" is the area subject to severe flood-related erosion losses. The area is designated as Zone E on the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) . D. "Area of special flood hazard" - See "special flood hazard area" . E. "Base flood" means the flood having a one percent chance of being equalled or exceeded in any given year (also called the 11100-year flood") . • F. "Basement" means any area of the building having its floor subgrade (below ground level) on all sides. G. 'Breakaway walls" are any type of walls, whether solid or lattice, and whether constructed of concrete, masonry, wood, metal, plastic or any other suitable building material which is not part of the structural support of the building and which is designed to break away under abnormally high tides or wave action without causing any damage to the structural integrity of the building on which they are used or any buildings to which they might be carried by flood waters. A breakaway wall shall have a safe design loading resistance of not less than ten and no more than twenty pounds per square foot. Use of breakaway walls must be certified by a registered engineer or architect and shall meet the following conditions: 1. Breakaway wall collapse shall result from a water load less than that which would occur during the base flood; and 2. The elevated portion of the building shall not incur any structural damage due to the effects of wind and water loads acting simultaneously in the event of the base flood. 3 H. "Development" means any man-made change to improved or • unimproved real estate, including but not limited to buildings or other structures, mining, dredging, filling, grading, paving, excavation or drilling operations. I. "Flood or flooding" means a general and temporary condition of partial or complete inundation of normally dry land areas from (1) the overflow of flood waters, (2) the unusual and rapid accumulation or runoff of surface waters from any source, and/or (3) the collapse or subsidence of land along the shore of a lake or other body of water as a result of erosion or undermining caused by waves or currents of water exceeding anticipated cyclical levels or suddenly caused by an unusually high water level in a natural body of water, accompanied by a severe storm, or by an unanticipated force of nature, such as flash flood or an abnormal tidal surge, or by some similarly unusual and unforeseeable event which results in flooding as defined in this definition. J. "Flood Boundary and Floodway Map" means the official map on which the Federal Emergency Management Agency or Federal Insurance Administration has delineated both the areas of flood hazard and the floodway. • K. "Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) " means the official map on which the Federal Emergency Management Agency or Federal Insurance Administration has delineated both the areas of special flood hazards and the risk premium zones applicable to the community. L. "Flood Insurance Study" means the official report provided by the Federal Insurance Administration that includes flood profiles, the FIRM, the Flood Boundary and Floodway Map, and the water surface elevation of the base flood. M. "Floodplain or flood-prone area" means any land area susceptible to being inundated by water from any source (see definition of "flooding") . N. "Floodplain management" means the operation of an overall program of corrective and preventive measures for reducing flood damage, including but not limited to emergency preparedness plans, flood control works and floodplain management regulations. O. "Floodplain management regulations" means zoning ordinances, sub-division regulations, building codes, health regulations, special purpose ordinances (such as 4 • floodplain ordinance, grading ordinance and erosion control ordinance) and other application of police power. The term describes such state or local regulations in any combination thereof, which provide standards for the purpose of flood damage prevention and reduction. P. "Floodproofing" means any combination of structural and nonstructural additions, changes, or adjustments to structures which reduce or eliminate flood damage to real estate or improved real property, water and sanitary facilities, structures and their contents. Q. "Floodway" means the channel of a river or other watercourse and the adjacent land areas that must be reserved in order to discharge the base flood without cumulatively increasing the water surface elevation more than one foot. Also referred to as "Regulatory Floodway" . R. "Functionally dependent use" means a use which cannot perform its intended purpose unless it is located or carried out in close proximity to water. The term includes only docking facilities, port facilities that • are necessary for the loading and unloading of cargo or passengers, and ship building and ship repair facil- ities, but does not include long-term storage or related manufacturing facilities. S. "Highest adjacent grade" means the highest natural elevation of the ground surface prior to construction next to the proposed walls of a structure. T. "Lowest floor" means the lowest floor of the lowest enclosed area (including basement) . An unfinished or flood resistant enclosure, usable solely for parking of vehicles, building access or storage in an area other than a basement area is not considered a building' s lowest floor; provided, that such enclosure is not built so as to render the structure in violation of the applicable non-elevation design requirements of this ordinance. U. "Manufactured home" means a structure, transportable in one or more sections, which is built on a permanent chassis and is designed for use with or without a permanent foundation when connected to the required utilities. For floodplain management purposes, the term "manufactured home" also includes park trailers, travel trailers and other similar vehicles placed on a site for greater than 180 consecutive days. 5 V. "Manufactured home park or subdivision" means a parcel • (or contiguous parcels) of land divided into two or more manufactured home lots for sale or rent. W. "Mean sea level" means, for purposes of the National Flood Insurance Program, the National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD) of 1929 or other datum, to which base flood elevations shown on a community' s Flood Insurance Rate Map are referenced. X. "New construction" means, for floodplain management purposes, structures for which the "start of construction" commenced on or after the effective date of a floodplain management regulation adopted by this community. Y. "One hundred year flood" or "100-year flood" means a flood which has a one percent annual probability of being equalled or exceeded. It is identical to the "base flood" , which will be the term used throughout this ordinance. Z. "Person" means an individual or his agent, firm, partnership, association or corporation, or agent of the aforementioned groups, or this state or its • agencies or political subdivisions. AA. "Remedy a violation" means to bring the structure or other development into compliance with State or local floodplain management regulations, or, if this is not possible, to reduce the impacts of its noncompliance. Ways that impacts may be reduced include protecting the structure or other affected development from flood damages, implementing the enforcement provisions of the ordinance or otherwise deterring future similar violations, or reducing Federal financial exposure with regard to the structure or other development. BB. "Riverine" means relating to, formed by, or resembling a river (including tributaries) , stream, brook, etc. CC. "Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA)_' means an area having special flood or flood-related erosion hazards, and shown on a FHBM or FIRM as Zone A, AO, Al-30, AE, A99, or AH. DD. "Start of construction" includes substantial improvement, and means the date the building permit was issued, provided the actual start of construction, repair, reconstruction, placement, or other improvement was within 180 days of the permit date. The actual start means either the first placement of permanent 6 • construction of a structure on a site, such as the pouring of slab or footings, the installation of piles, the construction of columns, or any work beyond the stage of excavation; or the placement of a manufactured home on a foundation. Permanent construction does not include land preparation, such as clearing, grading and filling; nor does it include the installation of streets and/or walkways; nor does it include excavation for a basement, footings, piers, or foundations or the erection of temporary forms; nor does it include the installation on the property of accessory buildings, such as garages or sheds not occupied as dwelling units or not part of the main structure. EE. "Structure" means a walled and roofed building, including a gas or liquid storage tank, that is principally above ground, as well as a manufactured home. FF. "Substantial improvement" means any repair, reconstruction, or improvement of a structure, the cost of which equals or exceeds 50 percent of the market value of the structure either: • 1. before the improvement or repair is started; or, 2. if the structure has been damaged, and is being restored, before the damage occurred. For the purposes of this definition "substantial improvement" is considered to occur when the first alteration of any wall, ceiling, floor, or other structural part of the building commences, whether or not that alteration affects the external dimensions of the structure. The term does not, however, include either: 1. any project for improvement of a structure to comply with existing state or local health, sanitary, or safety code specifications which are solely necessary to assure safe living conditions; or, 2. any alteration of a structure listed on the National Register of Historic Places or a State Inventory of Historic Places. GG. "Standards modification" means a grant of relief from the requirements of this ordinance which permits construction in a manner that would otherwise be • prohibited by this ordinance. 7 HH. "Violation" means the failure of a structure or other development to be fully compliant with the community' s floodplain management regulations. A structure or other development without the elevation certificate, other certifications, or other evidence of compliance required in this ordinance is presumed to be in violation until such time as that documentation is provided. SEC 7-2.301 - LANDS TO WHICH THIS ORDINANCE APPLIES This ordinance shall apply to all areas of special flood hazards, areas of flood-related erosion hazards within the jurisdiction of the City of Atascadero. SEC. 7-2.302 - BASIS FOR ESTABLISHING THE AREAS OF SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD The areas of special flood hazard, areas of flood-related erosion hazards identified by the Federal Emergency Management Agency or the Federal Insurance Administration in a scientific and engineering report entitled "Flood Insurance Study for City of Atascadero" latest edition, with an accompanying Flood Insurance Rate Map is hereby adopted by reference and declared to be a part of this ordinance. This Flood Insurance Study is on • file at 6500 Palma Avenue. This Flood Insurance Study is the minimum area of applicability of this ordinance and may be supplemented by studies for other areas which allow implementation of this ordinance and which are recommended to the Atascadero City Council by the Floodplain Administrator. SEC. 7-2.303 - COMPLIANCE No structure or land shall hereafter be constructed, located, extended, converted, or altered without full compliance with the terms of this ordinance and other applicable regulations. Violations of the provisions of this ordinance by failure to comply with any of its requirements (including violations of conditions and safeguards established in connection with conditions) shall constitute a misdemeanor. Nothing herein shall prevent the City of Atascadero from taking such lawful action as is necessary to prevent or remedy any violation. SEC. 7-2.304 - ABROGATION AND GREATER RESTRICTIONS This ordinance is not intended to repeal, abrogate, or impair any existing easements, covenants, or deed restrictions. However, where this ordinance and another ordinance, easement, covenant, or deed restriction conflict or overlap, whichever imposes the more stringent restrictions shall prevail. i 8 • SEC. 7-2.305 - INTERPRETATION In the interpretation and application of this ordinance, all provisions shall be: A. Considered as minimum requirements; B. Liberally construed in favor of the governing body; and, C. Deemed neither to limit nor repeal any other powers granted under state statutes. SEC. 7-2.306 - WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY The degree of flood protection required by this ordinance is considered reasonable for regulatory purposes and is based on scientific and engineering considerations. Larger floods can and will occur on rare occasions. Flood heights may be increased by man-made or natural causes. This ordinance does not imply that land outside the areas of special flood hazards, areas of flood- related erosion hazards or uses permitted within such areas will be free from flooding or flood damages. This ordinance shall not create liability on the part of the City of Atascadero, any officer or employee thereof, or the Federal Insurance Administration, for any flood damages that result from reliance on this ordinance or any administrative decision lawfully made • thereunder. SEC. 7-2.307 - SEVERABILITY This ordinance and the various parts thereof are hereby declared to be severable. Should any section of this ordinance be declared by the courts to be unconstitutional or in-valid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the ordinance as a whole, or any portion thereof other than the section so declared to be unconstitutional or invalid. SEC. 7-2.400 - ADMINISTRATION Administration of this ordinance is vested with the Community Development Director. SEC. 7-2.401 - ESTABLISHMENT OF DEVELOPMENT PERMIT A Development Permit shall be obtained before construction or development begins within any area of special flood hazards, areas of flood-related erosion hazards or established in Section 7-2. 302. Application for a Development Permit shall be made on forms furnished by the Floodplain Administrator and may include, but not be limited to: plans in duplicate drawn to scale showing the nature, location, dimensions, and elevation of the area in • question; existing or proposed structures, fill, storage of materials, drainage facilities; and the location of the 9 foregoing. Specifically, the following information is required: • A. Proposed elevation in relation to mean sea level, of the lowest floor (including basement) of all structures; in Zone AO, elevation of highest adjacent grade and proposed elevation of lowest floor of all structures; B. Proposed elevation in relation to mean sea level to which any structure will be floodproofed; C. All appropriate certifications listed in Section 7- 2. 403.D of this ordinance; and D. Description of the extent to which any watercourse will be altered or relocated as a result of proposed development. SEC. 7-2.402 - DESIGNATION OF THE FLOODPLAIN ADMINISTRATOR The Community Development Director is hereby appointed to administer and implement this ordinance by granting or denying development permits in accordance with its provisions. SEC. 7-2.403 - DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE FLOODPLAIN • ADMINISTRATOR The duties and responsibilities of the Floodplain Administrator shall include, but not be limited to: A. Permit review. 1. Review all development permits to determine that the permit requirements of this ordinance have been satisfied. 2. All other required state and federal permits have been obtained. 3. The site is reasonably safe from flooding. 4. The proposed development, as determined by the City Engineer, does not adversely affect the carrying capacity of the areas where based flood elevations have been determined but a floodway has not been designated. For purposes of this ordinance, "adversely affects" means that the cumulative effect of the proposed development when combined with all other existing and anticipated development will increase the water surface elevation of the base flood more than one • foot at any point. 10 B. Use of Other Base Flood Data. When base flood elevation data has not been provided in accordance with Section 7-2. 302. , the City Engineer shall obtain, review, and reasonably utilize any base flood elevation and floodway data available from a Federal, State or other source, in order to administer Section 7-2. 501. Any such information shall be submitted to the Atascadero City Council for adoption. C. Whenever a watercourse is to be altered or relocated: 1. Notify adjacent communities and the California Department of Water Resources prior to such alteration or relocation of a watercourse, and submit evidence of such notification to the Federal Insurance Administration. 2. Require that the flood carrying capacity of the altered or relocated portion of said watercourse is maintained. D. Obtain and maintain for public inspection and make available as needed: . 1. The certification required in Section 7-2.501.C. 1 (floor elevations) ; 2. The certification required in Section 7-2.501.C. 2 (elevations in areas of shallow flooding) ; 3. The certification required in Section 7-2. 501.C. 3.c (elevation or floodproofing of nonresidential structures) ; 4. The certification required in Section 7-2. 501.C. 4.a or SEC. 7-2. 501.C. 4.b (wet floodproofing standard) 5. The certified elevation required in Section 7- 2. 503.B (subdivision standards) ; 6. The certification required in Section 7-2. 505.A (floodway encroachments) ; E. Make interpretations where needed, as to the exact location of the boundaries of the areas of special flood hazards, areas of flood-related erosion hazards or for example, where there appears to be a conflict between a mapped boundary and actual field conditions. The person contesting the location of the boundary shall be given a reasonable opportunity to appeal the interpretation as provided in Section 7-2. 600. 11 • i F. Take action to remedy violations of this ordinance as • specified in Section 7-2. 303 herein. SEC. 7-2.500 - PROVISIONS FOR FLOOD HAZARD REDUCTION The following sections are for the reduction of flood hazards. SEC. 7-2.501 STANDARDS OF CONSTRUCTION In all areas of special flood hazards the following standards are required: A. Anchoring 1. All new construction and substantial improvements shall be anchored to prevent flotation, collapse or lateral movement of the structure resulting from hydrodynamic and hydrostatic loads, including the effects of buoyancy. 2. All new construction and substantial improvements shall be constructed with materials and utility equipment resistant to flood damage. 3. All new construction and substantial improvements shall be constructed with electrical, heating, • ventilation, plumbing and air conditioning equipment and other service facilities that are designed and/or located so as to prevent water from entering or accumulating within the components during conditions of flooding. 4. Require within Zones AH, or AO, adequate drainage paths around structures on slopes to guide flood waters around and away from proposed structures. C. Elevation and Floodproofing 1. New construction and substantial improvement of any structure shall have the lowest floor, including basement, elevated to or above the base flood elevation. Nonresidential structures may meet the standards in Section 7-2.501.C. 3. Upon the completion of the structure, the elevation of the lowest floor including basement shall be certified by a registered professional engineer or surveyor, or verified by the City Engineer to be properly elevated. Such certification or verification shall be provided to the Floodplain Administrator. 2. New construction and substantial improvement of a any structure in Zone AH, or AO shall have the 12 ! ! • lowest floor, including basement, elevated above the highest adjacent grade at least as high as the depth number specified in feet on the FIRM, or at least two feet if no depth number is specified. Nonresidential structures may meet the standards in Section 7-. 501. C. 3.upon, completion of the structure, the elevation of the lowest floor including basement, shall be certified by a registered professional engineer or surveyor, or verified by the City Engineer to be properly elevated. Such certification or verification shall be provided to the Floodplain Administrator. 3. Nonresidential construction shall either be elevated in conformance with Section 7-2. 501.C. 1. or 2. or together with attendant utility and sanitary facilities: a. Be floodproofed so that below the base flood level the structure is watertight with walls substantially impermeable to the passage of water; b. Have structural components capable of • resisting hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads and effects of buoyancy; and C. Be certified by a registered professional engineer or architect that the standards of this subsection are satisfied. Such certifications shall be provided to the City Engineer. 4. Require, for all new construction and substantial improvements, that fully enclosed areas below the lowest floor that are subject to flooding shall be designed to automatically equalize hydrostatic flood forces on exterior walls by allowing for the entry and exit of floodwaters. Designs for meeting this requirement must either be certified by a registered professional engineer or architect or meet or exceed the following minimum criteria: a. Either a minimum of two openings having a total net areas of not less than one square inch for every square foot of enclosed area subject to flooding shall be provided. The bottom of all openings shall be no higher than one foot above grade. openings may be equipped with screens, louvers, valves or other coverings or devices provided that they permit the automatic entry and exit of 13 floodwaters; or • b. Be certified to comply with a local floodproofing standard approved by the Federal Insurance Administration. 5. Manufactured homes shall also meet the standards in Section 7-2. 504. SEC. 7-2.502 STANDARDS FOR UTILITIES A. All new and replacement water supply and sanitary sewage systems shall be designed to minimize or eliminate infiltration of flood waters into the system and discharge from systems into flood waters. B. On-site waste disposal systems shall be located to avoid impairment to them or contamination from them during flooding. SEC. 7-2.503 STANDARDS FOR SUBDIVISIONS A. All preliminary subdivision proposals shall identify the flood hazard area and the elevation of the base flood. B. All final subdivision plans will provide the elevation • of proposed structure (s) and pads. If the site is filled above the base flood, the final pad elevation shall be certified by a registered professional engineer or surveyor and submitted to the City Engineer for review prior to transmittal to the Floodplain Administrator. C. All subdivision proposals shall be consistent with the need to minimize flood damage. D. All subdivision proposals shall have public utilities and facilities such as sewer, gas, electrical and water systems located and constructed to minimize flood damage. E. All subdivisions shall provide adequate drainage to reduce exposure to flood hazards. SEC. 7-2.504 - STANDARDS FOR MANUFACTURED HOMES All new and replacement manufactured homes and additions to manufactured homes shall: A. Be elevated so that the lowest floor is at or above the base flood elevation; and 14 • B. Be securely anchored to a permanent foundation system to resist flotation, collapse or lateral movement. SEC. 7-2.505 FLOODWAYS Located within areas of special flood hazard established in Section 7-2. 302 are areas designated as floodways. Since the floodway is an extremely hazardous area due to the velocity of flood waters which carry debris, potential projectiles, and erosion potential, as determined by the Floodplain Administrator the following provisions apply: A. Prohibit encroachments, including fill, new construc- tion, substantial improvements, and other development unless certification by a registered professional engineer or architect is provided demonstrating that encroachments shall not result in any increase in flood levels during the occurrence of the base flood discharge. B. If Section 7-2. 505.A is satisfied, all new construction and substantial improvements shall comply with all other applicable flood hazard reduction provisions of Section 5. • SEC 7-2.507 FLOOD-RELATED EROSION-PRONE AREAS A. The Floodplain Administrator shall require permits for proposed construction and other development within all flood-related erosion-prone areas as known to the community. B. Such permits shall be reviewed to determine whether the proposed site alterations and improvements will be reasonably safe from flood-related erosion and will not cause flood-related erosion hazards or otherwise aggravate the existing hazard. C. If a proposed improvement is found to be in the path of flood-related erosion or would increase the erosion hazard, such improvement shall be relocated or adequate protective measures shall be taken to avoid aggravating the existing erosion hazard. D. Within Zone E on the Flood Insurance Rate Map, a setback is required for all new development from the ocean, lake, bay, riverfront or other body of water to create a safety buffer consisting of a natural vegetative or contour strip. This buffer shall be designated according to the flood-related erosion hazard and erosion rate, in relation to the anticipated "useful life" of structures, and depending upon the 15 geologic, hydrologic, topographic and climatic • characteristics of the land. The buffer may be used for suitable open space purposes, such as for agricultural, forestry, outdoor recreation and wildlife habitat areas, and for other activities using temporary and portable structures only. SEC. 7-2.600 - STANDARDS MODIFICATION AND APPEALS PROCEDURE The following sections shall govern the processing of appeals and modification of standards. SEC. 7-2.601 - APPEALS A. The Planning Commission of The City of Atascadero shall hear and decide appeals and requests for standards modification from the requirements of this ordinance. B. The Planning Commission shall hear and decide appeals when it is alleged there is an error in any requirement, decision, or determination made by the Floodplain Administrator in the enforcement or administration of this ordinance. • C. In passing upon such applications, the Planning Commission shall consider all technical evaluations, all relevant factors, standards specified in other sections of this ordinance, and: 1. The danger that materials may be swept onto other lands to the injury of others; 2. The danger of life and property due to flooding or erosion damage; 3. The susceptibility of the proposed facility and its contents to flood damage and the effect of such damage on the individual owner; 4. The importance of the services provided by the proposed facility to the community; 5. The availability of alternative locations for the proposed use which are not subject to flooding or erosion damage; 6. The compatibility of the proposed use with existing and anticipated development; 7. The relationship of the proposed use to the • 16 • comprehensive plan and floodplain management program for that area; 8. The safety of access to the property in time of flood for ordinary and emergency vehicles; 9. The expected heights, velocity, duration, rate of rise, and sediment transport of the flood waters expected at the site; and, 10. The costs of providing governmental services during and after flood conditions, including maintenance and repair of public utilities and facilities such as sewer, gas, electrical, and water system, and streets and bridges. D. Generally, standards modifications may be issued for new construction and substantial improvements to be erected on a lot of one-half acre or less in size contiguous to and surrounded by lots with existing structures constructed below the base flood level, providing items 7-2. 601.C. 1. through 7-2. 601.C. 11 have been fully considered. As the lot size increases beyond one half acre, the technical justification required for issuing the standards modification increases. E. Upon consideration of the factors of Section 7-2. 601.0 and the purposes of this ordinance, the Planning Commission may attach such conditions to the granting of standards modification as it deems necessary to further the purposes of this ordinance. F. The Floodplain Administrator shall maintain the records of all appeal actions and report any standards modifications variances to the Federal Insurance Administration upon request. SEC. 7-2.602 CONDITIONS FOR STANDARDS MODIFICATION A. Standards Modification may be issued for the reconstruction, rehabilitation or restoration of structures listed in the National Register of Historic Places or the State Inventory of Historic Places, without regard to the procedures set forth in the remainder of this section. B. Standards modifications shall not be issued within any designated floodway if any increase in flood levels during the base flood discharge would result. C. Standards Modifications shall only be issued upon a 17 determination that the standards modification is the • minimum necessary, considering the flood hazard, to afford relief. D. Standards Modifications shall only be issued upon: 1. A showing of good and sufficient cause; 2. A determination that failure to grant the standards modification would result in exceptional hardship to the applicant; and 3. A determination that the granting of a standards modification will not result in increased flood heights, additional threats to public safety, extraordinary public expense, create nuisances, cause fraud on or victimization of, the public, or conflict with existing local laws or ordinances. E. Standards Modifications may be issued for new construction and substantial improvements and for other development necessary for the conduct of a functionally dependent use provided that the provisions of Sections 7-2. 602.A through 7-2. 602.D are satisfied and that the structure or other development is protected by methods • that minimize flood damages during the base flood and create no additional threats to public safety. F. Any applicant to whom a standards modification is granted shall be given written notice that the structure will be permitted to be built with a lowest floor elevation below the regulatory flood elevation and that the cost of flood insurance will be commensurate with the increased risk resulting from the reduced lowest floor elevation. A copy of the notice shall be recorded by the Floodplain Administrator in the office of the San Luis Obispo County Recorder and shall be recorded in a manner so that it appears in the chain of title of the affected parcel of land. Section 2. Publication The City Clerk shall cause this Ordinance to be published in the Atascadero News, a newspaper of general circulation, printed, published, and circulated in this City, once within fifteen (15) days after its passage, in accordance with Government Code Section 36933; and shall certify the adoption of this Ordinance; and shall cause this Ordinance and certification to be entered into the Book of Ordinances of this City. 18 • Section 3. Effective Date This Ordinance shall go into effect and be in full force and effect at 12:01 A.M. on the 31st day after its passage. On motion by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember the foregoing Ordinance is hereby adopted in its entirety by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: BONITA BORGESON, Mayor City of Atascadero ATTEST: • BOYD C. SHARITZ City Clerk APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: HENRY ENGE Community evelopmen " Director PAUL SENSIBAUGH City Engineer APPROVED AS TO FORM: JEFFREY J. JORGENSEN City Attorney 19 ITEM : B . 3 M E M O R A N D U M TO: Planning Commission FROM: Steven L. DeCamp, Senior Planner DATE: April 4, 1989 RE: Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance The National Flood Insurance Program regulations have been modified by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) . Because of these changes, all cities must update and amend their respective ordinances dealing with flood protection. Failure to adopt a revised ordinance will render Atascadero residents ineligible for participation in the National Flood Insurance Program. Although Atascadero has had a "Flood Hazard Overlay" as part of its Zoning Ordinance (Title 9) , consultation with the State Department of Water Resources has resulted in a determination to prepare a more comprehensive ordinance dealing with flood damage • prevention for inclusion within the Municipal Code. This new ordinance follows the model prepared by FEMA, and has been reviewed by the State, the City Attorney, and the City Engineer, to ensure that local conditions and circumstances have been taken into consideration. The existing language in Title 9 of the AMC will not be deleted at this time because those provisions cover a larger area than is affected by the proposed new ordinance. The standards established in the Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance will apply within those areas designated on the Floodway and Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) prepared by FEMA. Copies of these maps are available for review in the Community Development Department. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission should recommend that the City Council adopt the Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance. SLD/ Attachment: Draft Ordinance ATASCADERO MUNICIPAL CODE (� TITLE 7 - CHAPTER 2 • FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION ORDINANCE SEC. 7-2.100 - FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION This Ordinance is enacted to protect the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Atascadero and their property and to meet the requirements of state and federal legislation. SEC. 7-2.101 STATUTORY AUTHORIZATION The Legislature of the State of California has in Government Code Sections 65302, 65560 and 65800 conferred upon local government units authority to adopt regulations designed to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare of its citizenry. Therefore, the City Council of the City of Atascadero does ordain as follows: SEC. 7-2.102 - FINDING OF FACT A. The flood hazard areas of the City of Atascadero are subject to periodic inundation which results in loss of life and, property, health and safety hazards, disruption of commerce and governmental services, extraordinary public expenditures for flood protection and relief, and impairment of the tax base, all of which adversely affect the public health, safety and general welfare. B. These flood losses are caused by the cumulative effect of obstructions in areas of special flood hazards which increase flood heights and velocities, and when inadequately anchored, damage uses in other areas. Uses that are inadequately flood-proofed, elevated or otherwise protected from flood damage also contribute to the flood loss. SEC. 7-2.103 - STATEMENT OF PURPOSE It is the purpose of this ordinance to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare, and to minimize public and private losses due to flood conditions in specific areas by provisions designed: A. To protect human life and health; B. To minimize expenditure of public money for costly flood control projects; C. To minimize the need for rescue and relief efforts associa- ted with flooding and generally undertaken at the expense of 1 the general public; D. To minimize prolonged business interruptions; E. To minimize damage to public facilities and utilities such as water and gas mains, electric, telephone and sewer lines, streets and bridges located in areas of special flood hazard F. To help maintain a stable tax base by providing for the second use and development of areas of special flood hazard so as to minimize future flood blight areas; G. To insure that potential buyers are notified that property is in an area of special flood hazard; and H. To insure that those who occupy the areas of special flood hazard assume responsibility for their actions. SEC. 7-2.104 - METHODS OF REDUCING FLOOD LOSSES In order to accomplish its purposes, this ordinance includes methods and provisions for: A. Restricting or prohibiting uses which are dangerous to health, safety, and property due to water or erosion hazards, or which result in damaging increases in erosion or • flood heights or velocities; B. Requiring that uses vulnerable to floods, including facilities which serve such uses, be protected against flood damage at the time of initial construction; C. Controlling the alterations of natural floodplains, stream channels, and natural protective barriers, which help accommodate or channel flood waters; D. Controlling filling, grading, dredging, and other develop- ment which may increase flood damage; and E. Preventing or regulating the construction of flood barriers which will unnaturally divert flood waters or which may increase flood hazards in other areas. SEC. 7-2.200 - DEFINITIONS Unless specifically defined below, words or phrases used in this ordinance shall be interpreted so as to give them the meaning they have in common usage and to give this ordinance its most reasonable application. A. "Appeal" means a review of the Floodplain Administrator' s interpretation of any provision of this 2 • ordinance or a request for standards modification. B. "Area of shallow flooding" means a designated A0, or AH zone on the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) . The base flood depths range from one to three feet; a clearly defined channel does not exist; the path of flooding is unpredictable and indeterminate; and velocity flow may be evident. C. "Area of special flood-related erosion hazard" is the area subject to severe flood-related erosion losses. The area is designated as Zone E on the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) . D. "Area of special flood hazard" - See "special flood hazard area" . E. "Base flood" means the flood having a one percent chance of being equalled or exceeded in any given year (also called the "100-year flood") . F. "Basement"means any area of the building having its floor subgrade (below ground level) on all sides. G. "Breakaway walls" are any type of walls, whether solid or lattice, and whether constructed of concrete, masonry, wood, metal, plastic or any other suitable building material which is not part of the structural support of the building and which is designed to break away under abnormally high tides or wave action without causing any damage to the structural integrity of the building on which they are used or any buildings to which they might be carried by flood waters. A breakaway wall shall have a safe design loading resistance of not less than ten and no more than twenty pounds per square foot. Use of breakaway walls must be certified by a registered engineer or architect and shall meet the following conditions: 1. Breakaway wall collapse shall result from a water load less than that which would occur during the base flood; and 2. The elevated portion of the building shall not incur any structural damage due to the effects of wind and water loads acting simultaneously in the event of the base flood. H. "Development"means any man-made change to improved or unimproved real estate, including but not limited to • buildings or other structures, mining, dredging, filling, grading, paving, excavation or drilling 3 operations. • I. "Flood or flooding" means a general and temporary condition of partial or complete inundation of normally dry land areas from (1) the overflow of flood waters, (2) the unusual and rapid accumulation or runoff of surface waters from any source, and/or (3) the collapse or subsidence of land along the shore of a lake or other body of water as a result of erosion or undermining caused by waves or currents of water exceeding anticipated cyclical levels or suddenly caused by an unusually high water level in a natural body of water, accompanied by a severe storm, or by an unanticipated force of nature, such as flash flood or an abnormal tidal surge, or by some similarly unusual and unforeseeable event which results in flooding as defined in this definition. J. "Flood Boundary and Floodway Map" means the official map on which the Federal Emergency Management Agency or Federal Insurance Administration has delineated both the areas of flood hazard and the floodway. K. "Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) " means the official map on which the Federal Emergency Management Agency or Federal Insurance Administration has delineated both . the areas of special flood hazards and the risk premium zones applicable to the community. L. "Flood Insurance Study" means the official report provided by the Federal Insurance Administration that includes flood profiles, the FIRM, the Flood Boundary and Floodway Map, and the water surface elevation of the base flood. M. "Floodplain or flood-prone area" means any land area susceptible to being inundated by water from any source (see definition of "flooding") . N. "Floodplain management" means the operation of an overall program of corrective and preventive measures for reducing flood damage, including but not limited to emergency preparedness plans, flood control works and floodplain management regulations. 0. "Floodplain management regulations" means zoning ordinances, sub-division regulations, building codes, health regulations, special purpose ordinances (such as floodplain ordinance, grading ordinance and erosion control ordinance) and other application of police power. The term describes such state or local regulations in any combination thereof, which provide 4 • standards for the purpose of flood damage prevention and reduction. P. "Floodproofing" means any combination of structural and nonstructural additions, changes, or adjustments to structures which reduce or eliminate flood damage to real estate or improved real property, water and sanitary facilities, structures and their contents. Q. "Floodway" means the channel of a river or other watercourse and the adjacent land areas that must be reserved in order to discharge the base flood without cumulatively increasing the water surface elevation more than one foot. Also referred to as "Regulatory Floodway" . R. "Functionally dependent use" means a use which cannot perform its intended purpose unless it is located or carried out in close proximity to water. The term includes only docking facilities, port facilities that are necessary for the loading and unloading of cargo or passengers, and ship building and ship repair facil- ities, but does not include long-term storage or related manufacturing facilities. • S. "Highest adjacent grade" means the highest natural elevation of the ground surface prior to construction next to the proposed walls of a structure. T. "Lowest floor" means the lowest floor of the lowest enclosed area (including basement) . An unfinished or flood resistant enclosure, usable solely for parking of vehicles, building access or storage in an area other than a basement area is not considered a building' s lowest floor; provided, that such enclosure is not built so as to render the structure in violation of the applicable non-elevation design requirements of this ordinance. U. "Manufactured home" means a structure, transportable in one or more sections, which is built on a permanent chassis and is designed for use with or without a permanent foundation when connected to the required utilities. For floodplain management purposes, the term "manufactured home" also includes park trailers, travel trailers and other similar vehicles placed on a site for greater than 180 consecutive days. V. "Manufactured home park or subdivision" means a parcel (or contiguous parcels) of land divided into two or more manufactured home lots for sale or rent. 5 W. "Mean sea level" means, for purposes of the National • Flood Insurance Program, the National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD) of 1929 or other datum, to which base flood elevations shown on a community' s Flood Insurance Rate Map are referenced. X. "New construction" means, for floodplain management purposes, structures for which the "start of construction" commenced on or after the effective date of a floodplain management regulation adopted by this community. Y. "One hundred year flood" or "100-year flood" means a flood which has a one percent annual probability of being equalled or exceeded. It is identical to the "base flood" , which will be the term used throughout this ordinance. Z. "Person" means an individual or his agent, firm, partnership, association or corporation, or agent of the aforementioned groups, or this state or its agencies or political subdivisions. AA. "Remedy a violation" means to bring the structure or other development into compliance with State or local floodplain management regulations, or, if this is not • possible, to reduce the impacts of its noncompliance. Ways that impacts may be reduced include protecting the structure or other affected development from flood damages, implementing the enforcement provisions of the ordinance or otherwise deterring future similar violations, or reducing Federal financial exposure with regard to the structure or other development. BB. "Riverine" means relating to, formed by, or resembling a river (including tributaries) , stream, brook, etc. CC. "Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) " means an area having special flood or flood-related erosion hazards, and shown on a FHBM or FIRM as Zone A, AO, Al-30, AE, A99, or AH. DD. "Start of construction" includes substantial improvement, and means the date the building permit was issued, provided the actual start of construction, repair, reconstruction, placement, or other improvement was within 180 days of the permit date. The actual start means either the first placement of permanent construction of a structure on a site, such as the pouring of slab or footings, the installation of piles, the construction of columns, or any work beyond the stage of excavation; or the placement of a manufactured 6 • home on a foundation. Permanent construction does not include land preparation, such as clearing, grading and filling; nor does it include the installation of streets and/or walkways; nor does it include excavation for a basement, footings, piers, or foundations or the erection of temporary forms; nor does it include the installation on the property of accessory buildings, such as garages or sheds not occupied as dwelling units or not part of the main structure. EE. "Structure" means a walled and roofed building, including a gas or liquid storage tank, that is principally above ground, as well as a manufactured home. FF. "Substantial improvement' means any repair, reconstruction, or improvement of a structure, the cost of which equals or exceeds 50 percent of the market value of the structure either: 1. before the improvement or repair is started; or, 2. if the structure has been damaged, and is being restored, before the damage occurred. • For the purposes of this definition "substantial improvement" is considered to occur when the first alteration of any wall, ceiling, floor, or other structural part of the building commences, whether or not that alteration affects the external dimensions of the structure. The term does not, however, include either: 1. any project for improvement of a structure to comply with existing state or local health, sanitary, or safety code specifications which are solely necessary to assure safe living conditions; or, 2. any alteration of a structure listed on the National Register of Historic Places or a State Inventory of Historic Places. GG. 'Standards modification' means a grant of relief from the requirements of this ordinance which permits construction in a manner that would otherwise be prohibited by this ordinance. HH. 'Violation' means the failure of a structure or other • development to be fully compliant with the community' s floodplain management regulations. A structure or 7 other development without the elevation certificate, • other certifications, or other evidence of compliance required in this ordinance is presumed to be in violation until such time as that documentation is provided. SEC 7-2.301 - LANDS TO WHICH THIS ORDINANCE APPLIES This ordinance shall apply to all areas of special flood hazards, areas of flood-related erosion hazards within the jurisdiction of the City of Atascadero. SEC. 7-2.302 - BASIS FOR ESTABLISHING THE AREAS OF SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD The areas of special flood hazard, areas of flood-related erosion hazards identified by the Federal Emergency Management Agency or the Federal Insurance Administration in a scientific and engineering report entitled "Flood Insurance Study for City of Atascadero" latest edition, with an accompanying Flood Insurance Rate Map is hereby adopted by reference and declared to be a part of this ordinance. This Flood Insurance Study is on file at 6500 Palma Avenue. This Flood Insurance Study is the minimum area of applicability of this ordinance and may be supplemented by studies for other areas which allow implementation of this ordinance and which are recommended to the • Atascadero City Council by the Floodplain Administrator. SEC. 7-2.303 - COMPLIANCE No structure or land shall hereafter be constructed, located, extended, converted, or altered without full compliance with the terms of this ordinance and other applicable regulations. Violations of the provisions of this ordinance by failure to comply with any of its requirements (including violations of conditions and safeguards established in connection with conditions) shall constitute a misdemeanor. Nothing herein shall prevent the City of Atascadero from taking such lawful action as is necessary to prevent or remedy any violation. SEC. 7-2.304 - ABROGATION AND GREATER RESTRICTIONS This ordinance is not intended to repeal, abrogate, or impair any existing easements, covenants, or deed restrictions. However, where this ordinance and another ordinance, easement, covenant, or deed restriction conflict or overlap, whichever imposes the more stringent restrictions shall prevail. SEC. 7-2.305 - INTERPRETATION In the interpretation and application of this ordinance, all provisions shall be: 8 • A. Considered as minimum requirements; B. Liberally construed in favor of the governing body; and, C. Deemed neither to limit nor repeal any other powers granted under state statutes. SEC. 7-2.306 - WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY The degree of flood protection required by this ordinance is considered reasonable for regulatory purposes and is based on scientific and engineering considerations. Larger floods can and will occur on rare occasions. Flood heights may be increased by man-made or natural causes. This ordinance does not imply that land outside the areas of special flood hazards, areas of flood- related erosion hazards or uses permitted within such areas will be free from flooding or flood damages. This ordinance shall not create liability on the part of the City of Atascadero, any officer or employee thereof, or the Federal Insurance Administration, for any flood damages that result from reliance on this ordinance or any administrative decision lawfully made thereunder. SEC. 7-2.307 - SEVERABILITY • This ordinance and the various parts thereof are hereby declared to be severable. Should any section of this ordinance be declared by the courts to be unconstitutional or in-valid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the ordinance as a whole, or any portion thereof other than the section so declared to be unconstitutional or invalid. SEC. 7-2.400 - ADMINISTRATION Administration of this ordinance is vested with the Community Development Director. SEC. 7-2.401 - ESTABLISffi4ENT OF DEVELOPMENT PERMIT A Development Permit shall be obtained before construction or development begins within any area of special flood hazards, areas of flood-related erosion hazards or established in Section 7-2. 302. Application for a Development Permit shall be made on forms furnished by the Floodplain Administrator and may include, but not be limited to: plans in duplicate drawn to scale showing the nature, location, dimensions, and elevation of the area in question; existing or proposed structures, fill, storage of materials, drainage facilities; and the location of the foregoing. Specifically, the following information is required: A. Proposed elevation in relation to mean sea level, of the lowest floor (including basement) of all 9 structures; in Zone A0, elevation of highest adjacent • grade and proposed elevation of lowest floor of all structures; B. Proposed elevation in relation to mean sea level to which any structure will be floodproofed; C. All appropriate certifications listed in Section 7- 2. 403.D of this ordinance; and D. Description of the extent to which any watercourse will be altered or relocated as a result of proposed development. SEC. 7-2.402 - DESIGNATION OF THE FLOODPLAIN ADMINISTRATOR The Community Development Director is hereby appointed to administer and implement this ordinance by granting or denying development permits in accordance with its provisions. SEC. 7-2.403 - DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE FLOODPLAIN ADMINISTRATOR The duties and responsibilities of the Floodplain Administrator shall include, but not be limited to: A. Permit review. • 1. Review all development permits to determine that the permit requirements of this ordinance have been satisfied. 2. All other required state and federal permits have been obtained. 3. The site is reasonably safe from flooding. 4. The proposed development, as determined by the City Engineer, does not adversely affect the carrying capacity of the areas where based flood elevations have been determined but a floodway has not been designated. For purposes of this ordinance, "adversely affects" means that the cumulative effect of the proposed development when combined with all other existing and anticipated development will increase the water surface elevation of the base flood more than one foot at any point. B. Use of Other Base Flood Data. When base flood elevation data has not been provided in accordance with Section 7-2.302. , the City Engineer shall obtain, 10 0 • review, and reasonably utilize any base flood elevation and floodway data available from a Federal, State or other source, in order to administer Section 7-2. 501. Any such information shall be submitted to the Atascadero City Council for adoption. C. Whenever a watercourse is to be altered or relocated: 1. Notify adjacent communities and the California Department of Water Resources prior to such alteration or relocation of a watercourse, and submit evidence of such notification to the Federal Insurance Administration. 2. Require that the flood carrying capacity of the altered or relocated portion of said watercourse is maintained. D. Obtain and maintain for public inspection and make available as needed: 1. The certification required in Section 7-2. 501.C. 1 (floor elevations) ; 2. The certification required in Section 7-2. 501.C. 2 • (elevations in areas of shallow flooding) ; 3. The certification required in Section 7-2. 501.C. 3.c (elevation or floodproofing of nonresidential structures) ; 4. The certification required in Section 7-2. 501.C. 4.a or SEC. 7-2. 501.C. 4.b (wet floodproofing standard) ; 5. The certified elevation required in Section 7- 2.503.B (subdivision standards) ; 6. The certification required in Section 7-2. 505.A (floodway encroachments) ; E. Make interpretations where needed, as to the exact location of the boundaries of the areas of special flood hazards, areas of flood-related erosion hazards or for example, where there appears to be a conflict between a mapped boundary and actual field conditions. The person contesting the location of the boundary shall be given a reasonable opportunity to appeal the interpretation as provided in Section 7-2. 600. F. Take action to remedy violations of this ordinance as • specified in Section 7-2. 303 herein. 11 SEC. 7-2.500 - PROVISIONS FOR FLOOD HAZARD REDUCTION The following sections are for the reduction of flood hazards. • SEC. 7-2.501 STANDARDS OF CONSTRUCTION In all areas of special flood hazards the following standards are required: A. Anchoring 1. All new construction and substantial improvements shall be anchored to prevent flotation, collapse or lateral movement of the structure resulting from hydrodynamic and hydrostatic loads, including the effects of buoyancy. 2. All new construction and substantial improvements shall be constructed with materials and utility equipment resistant to flood damage. 3. All new construction and substantial improvements shall be constructed with electrical, heating, ventilation, plumbing and air conditioning equipment and other service facilities that are designed and/or located so as to prevent water from entering or accumulating within the components during conditions of flooding. • 4. Require within Zones AH, or AO, adequate drainage paths around structures on slopes to guide flood waters around and away from proposed structures. C. Elevation and Floodproofing 1. New construction and substantial improvement of any structure shall have the lowest floor, including basement, elevated to or above the base flood elevation. Nonresidential structures may meet the standards in Section 7-2.501.C. 3. Upon the completion of the structure, the elevation of the lowest floor including basement shall be certified by a registered professional engineer or surveyor, or verified by the City Engineer to be properly elevated. Such certification or verification shall be provided to the Floodplain Administrator. 2. New construction and substantial improvement of any structure in Zone AH, or AO shall have the lowest floor, including basement, elevated above the highest adjacent grade at least as high as the depth number specified in feet on the FIRM, or at 12 • least two feet if no depth number is specified. Nonresidential structures may meet the standards in Section 7-. 501. C. 3.upon, completion of the structure, the elevation of the lowest floor including basement, shall be certified by a registered professional engineer or surveyor, or verified by the City Engineer to be properly elevated. Such certification or verification shall be provided to the Floodplain Administrator. 3. Nonresidential construction shall either be elevated in conformance with Section 7-2. 501.C. 1. or 2. or together with attendant utility and sanitary facilities: a. Be floodproofed so that below the base flood level the structure is watertight with walls substantially impermeable to the passage of water; b. Have structural components capable of resisting hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads and effects of buoyancy; and C. Be certified by a registered professional • engineer or architect that the standards of this subsection are satisfied. Such certifications shall be provided to the City Engineer. 4. Require, for all new construction and substantial improvements, that fully enclosed areas below the lowest floor that are subject to flooding shall be designed to automatically equalize hydrostatic flood forces on exterior walls by allowing for the entry and exit of floodwaters. Designs for meeting this requirement must either be certified by a registered professional engineer or architect or meet or exceed the following minimum criteria: a. Either a minimum of two openings having a total net areas of not less than one square inch for every square foot of enclosed area subject to flooding shall be provided. The bottom of all openings shall be no higher than one foot above grade. Openings may be equipped with screens, louvers, valves or other coverings or devices provided that they permit the automatic entry and exit of floodwaters; or b. Be certified to comply with a local 13 floodproofing standard approved by the • Federal Insurance Administration. 5. Manufactured homes shall also meet the standards in Section 7-2. 504. SEC. 7-2.502 STANDARDS FOR UTILITIES A. All new and replacement water supply and sanitary sewage systems shall be designed to minimize or eliminate infiltration of flood waters into the system and discharge from systems into flood waters. B. On-site waste disposal systems shall be located to avoid impairment to them or contamination from them during flooding. SEC. 7-2.503 STANDARDS FOR SUBDIVISIONS A. All preliminary subdivision proposals shall identify the flood hazard area and the elevation of the base flood. B. All final subdivision plans will provide the elevation of proposed structure (s) and pads. If the site is filled above the base flood, the final pad elevation • shall be certified by a registered professional engineer or surveyor and submitted to the City Engineer for review prior to transmittal to the Floodplain Administrator. C. All subdivision proposals shall be consistent with the need to minimize flood damage. D. All subdivision proposals shall have public utilities and facilities such as sewer, gas, electrical and water systems located and constructed to minimize flood damage. E. All subdivisions shall provide adequate drainage to reduce exposure to flood hazards. SEC. 7-2.504 - STANDARDS FOR MANUFACTURED HOMES All new and replacement manufactured homes and additions to manufactured homes shall: A. Be elevated so that the lowest floor is at or above the base flood elevation; and B. Be securely anchored to a permanent foundation system to resist flotation, collapse or lateral movement. 14 • SEC. 7-2.505 FLOODWAYS Located within areas of special flood hazard established in Section 7-2. 302 are areas designated as floodways. Since the floodway is an extremely hazardous area due to the velocity of flood waters which carry debris, potential projectiles, and erosion potential, as determined by the Floodplain Administrator the following provisions apply: A. Prohibit encroachments, including fill, new construc- tion, substantial improvements, and other development unless certification by a registered professional engineer or architect is provided demonstrating that encroachments shall not result in any increase in flood levels during the occurrence of the base flood discharge. B. If Section 7-2. 505.A is satisfied, all new construction and substantial improvements shall comply with all other applicable flood hazard reduction provisions of Section 5. SEC 7-2.507 FLOOD-RELATED EROSION-PRONE AREAS • A. The Floodplain Administrator shall require permits for proposed construction and other development within all flood-related erosion-prone areas as known to the community. B. Such permits shall be reviewed to determine whether the proposed site alterations and improvements will be reasonably safe from flood-related erosion and will not cause flood-related erosion hazards or otherwise aggravate the existing hazard. C. If a proposed improvement is found to be in the path of flood-related erosion or would increase the erosion hazard, such improvement shall be relocated or adequate protective measures shall be taken to avoid aggravating the existing erosion hazard. D. Within Zone E on the Flood Insurance Rate Map, a setback is required for all new development from the ocean, lake, bay, riverfront or other body of water to create a safety buffer consisting of a natural vegetative or contour strip. This buffer shall be designated according to the flood-related erosion hazard and erosion rate, in relation to the anticipated "useful life" of structures, and depending upon the geologic, hydrologic, topographic and climatic characteristics of the land. The buffer may be used 15 0 • for suitable open space purposes, such as for agricultural, forestry, outdoor recreation and wildlife habitat areas, and for other activities using temporary and portable structures only. SEC. 7-2.600 - STANDARDS MODIFICATION AND APPEALS PROCEDURE The following sections shall govern the processing of appeals and modification of standards. SEC. 7-2.601 - APPEALS A. The Planning Commission of The City of Atascadero shall hear and decide appeals and requests for standards modification from the requirements of this ordinance. B. The Planning Commission shall hear and decide appeals when it is alleged there is an error in any requirement, decision, or determination made by the Floodplain Administrator in the enforcement or administration of this ordinance. C. In passing upon such applications, the Planning Commission shall consider all technical evaluations, all relevant factors, standards specified in other • sections of this ordinance, and: 1. The danger that materials may be swept onto other lands to the injury of others; 2. The danger of life and property due to flooding or erosion damage; 3. The susceptibility of the proposed facility and its contents to flood damage and the effect of such damage on the individual owner; 4. The importance of the services provided by the proposed facility to the community; 5. The availability of alternative locations for the proposed use which are not subject to flooding or erosion damage; 6. The compatibility of the proposed use with existing and anticipated development; 7. The relationship of the proposed use to the comprehensive plan and floodplain management program for that area; 16 w • 8. The safety of access to the property in time of flood for ordinary and emergency vehicles; 9. The expected heights, velocity, duration, rate of rise, and sediment transport of the flood waters expected at the site; and, 10. The costs of providing governmental services during and after flood conditions, including maintenance and repair of public utilities and facilities such as sewer, gas, electrical, and water system, and streets and bridges. D. Generally, standards modifications may be issued for new construction and substantial improvements to be erected on a lot of one-half acre or less in size contiguous to and surrounded by lots with existing structures constructed below the base flood level, providing items 7-2. 601.C. 1. through 7-2. 601.C. 11 have been fully considered. As the lot size increases beyond one half acre, the technical justification required for issuing the standards modification increases. • E. Upon consideration of the factors of Section 7-2. 601.0 and the purposes of this ordinance, the Planning Commission may attach such conditions to the granting of standards modification as it deems necessary to further the purposes of this ordinance. F. The Floodplain Administrator shall maintain the records of all appeal actions and report any standards modifications variances to the Federal Insurance Administration upon request. SEC. 7-2.602 CONDITIONS FOR STANDARDS MODIFICATION A. Standards Modification may be issued for the reconstruction, rehabilitation or restoration of structures listed in the National Register of Historic Places or the State Inventory of Historic Places, without regard to the procedures set forth in the remainder of this section. B. Standards modifications shall not be issued within any designated floodway if any increase in flood levels during the base flood discharge would result. C. Standards Modifications shall only be issued upon a determination that the standards modification is the • minimum necessary, considering the flood hazard, to 17 w w afford relief. D. Standards Modifications shall only be issued upon: 1. A showing of good and sufficient cause; 2. A determination that failure to grant the standards modification would result in exceptional hardship to the applicant; and 3. A determination that the granting of a standards modification will not result in increased flood heights, additional threats to public safety, extraordinary public expense, create nuisances, cause fraud on or victimization of, the public, or conflict with existing local laws or ordinances. E. Standards Modifications may be issued for new construction and substantial improvements and for other development necessary for the conduct of a functionally dependent use provided that the provisions of Sections 7-2. 602.A through 7-2. 602.D are satisfied and that the structure or other development is protected by methods that minimize flood damages during the base flood and create no additional threats to public safety. F. Any applicant to whom a standards modification is • granted shall be given written notice that the structure will be permitted to be built with a lowest floor elevation below the regulatory flood elevation and that the cost of flood insurance will be commensurate with the increased risk resulting from the reduced lowest floor elevation. A copy of the notice shall be recorded by the Floodplain Administrator in the office of the San Luis Obispo County Recorder and shall be recorded in a manner so that it appears in the chain of title of the affected parcel of land. REV:03/13/89 • 18 DAT Z5�92�M �- r' MEMORANDUM °F To: Honorable Mayor and City Council U Through: Ray Windsor, City Manager From: Paul M. Sensibaugh, Director of Public Works/City Engineer 1�hS" Subject : Asbestos Change Order-City Hall Renovation Project Date : April 18, 1989 Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the attached change order, but suggests that the line item for Gen. Conditions (Equip ./Expenses) , which are direct overhead to the extra work due to altering the critical path, or the line item for District and Head Office Overhead and Commission be negotiated downward. • Background: During the preparatory investigations by the Asbestos Removal Sub-contractor it was discovered that there was approximately 500 more feet of asbestos-covered pipe within the vertical shafts, which run from the basement to the fourth floor, and over the first floor rotunda ceiling, than was anticipated by the consultant 's drawings and quantity estimate for that item. That extra work is shown on the Change Order Request as line item "Frank Garcia, Inc . " (the asbestos sub-contractor) in the amount of $7,772. In addition to the extra pipe, it was discovered that the shafts were full of dust that was potentially crumbled asbestos that has fallen from the pipes over the last 75 years. The dust was tested and showed positive . Removal of such particles are mandatory and not optional , both to the City and to a contractor that has work in the vicinity. Asbestos regulations that became effective January 1 , 1989 tighten up the already serious handling of asbestos materials . The estimates for this work were $121,000, $120,000, $33,000 and $15,500, the later of which is shown on the proposed change order. The flooring in the two old libraries was also tested and also showed positive. The $775 on the change order reflects the cleaning of the particles disturbed by recent electrical work in the former Children' s Library. That flooring will remain and carpet will be pasted to the tile . Future removal of that carpet will integrate the removal of the tile as the two will become one for the sake of asbestos removal regulations. The former Adult Library already has carpet which optionally could be replaced. Since the removal of the same was quoted at- $18,349, staff has opted to forgo such removal at this time, thus deleting that amount of new carpeting from the contract . The original ceiling tile was also tested but showed negative. Discussion: • While it is not particularly easy to swallow the some $24, 000 that it will take to remove the asbestos, it is understood that there is not much choice in the matter. If that work was bid out on it ' s own, since it is a new scope of work, the project would be delayed for about 30 to 45 days and would have a tremendous impact on the critical path for the main construction which is geared to a bid period of 180 days . The relatively short delay of 12 days required for the sub- contracted work, however, is shown as a loss to the main contractor on the change order. This is the portion of the Change Order Request that is more difficult to digest . It is understood that any additional salaries for a time extension are a true cost to the contractor, as well as a resonable overhead and profit as specified in the bid documents at 15% and 10%, respectively. The contractor has broken down his quote and has made a distinction between direct and indirect overhead costs . Perhaps if the isolated costs were included in a lump sum distinction would be more difficult to determine on our own, but since that information is readily available it is difficult to rationalize its Justification from the owner' s standpoint . The contractor, who will be present at the meeting, is strongly • supporting his request and has reduced the total change order amount from about $61 ,000 to approximately $40, 000, through negotiations with the Public Works Superintendent and Fred Schott & Assoc . The consultant will also be in attendance at the meeting. The difficulty of acceptance on the staff level is simple . If the total work time would happen to be less than 180 days, the costs shown may not be Justified. Therefore, the time delay costs should be deferred to the end of the Job if the staff assumption has merit . The contractor argues that, absent any change orders, if the work is completed in less than 180 days, that time represents profit (or absent expenses) that the contractor feels he has earned since any time over the 180 days is subject the penalty of liquidated damages . That argument may be perfectly legitimate, but it is very difficult to agree to when a change order is involved which allows for extended time and includes adequate compensation for the extra work. If the total work, including the same change order, is completed in less than 180 days, it would appear that the costs to the contractor are not increased over the amount bid, since it was assumed that most workers would be on the Job under salary for that length of time . s • The extra cost of $412 per day for 12 days was arrived at by dividing the costs allocated to a base time of 180 days. If more days were bid, theoretically the bid would be higher; if less days were bid, then the bid would be lower. However, since the bid was for 180 days and an overage of time will cost additional money, it follows that an underage of time would result in an actual daily unit cost of less than the $412 shown, since less insurance, bonding, etc . are necessary. This may seem to be a minor point, especially to the contractor who doesn' t agree with it at all , but it still represents either an addition of $4, 944 for Gen. Conditions or $7,791 for Overhead and Commission, whichever is considered unwarranted. The contractor is apparently willing to negotiate, say, 8 days versus 12 days extra time but is not willing to defer the time until the end of the job. He is insistant that this is a standard request, but of all of the time extensions that this office has granted for delays not the fault of the contractor never have any such change orders included a cost to the owner for keeping the contractor on the job beyond his time anticipated in the bid. This office is also of the firm belief that the time should be a part of the bid unless the work is of an emergency status. In this case, however, a fixed time was set in the specifications, which is not uncommon, and would probably work in favor of the contractor if a • claim was filed for non—payment . NOTE: This change order has already been authorized on the staff level since (a) the abatement work is mandatory, (b) any further delays to the contractor would result in additional claims for each day added, (c) a rebid of the (additional ) work may result in even greater costs, (d) the staff has informed the contractor, and the contractor has verbally agreed in order to resume work, that some of the costs shown are contested and may or may not be reasonable to the City Council , and (e) the contractor was informed that change orders of this size require the approval of Council before payments can be made. Fiscal Impact : There are no contingencies appropriated for this project since the bid amount exceeded the budget and an $80,000 ammendment was necessary to begin the work. There will be some deletions to the project due to some rooms receiving previous renovation, but that amount is undetermined at this time since the Room Renovation bid was a lump sum and any deducts will have to be negotiated through a 'determination of actual costs similar to those shown on the above change order. Additionally, there may be still other minor, or major, increases in work due to the entrance into unknown territory • that is common with renovation projects. It is suggested at this time that the change order be supported by an appropriation ammendment of $40, 000 from the General Fund Balance, or such other account as determined by the City Manager. R.P. RICHARDS CONSTRUCTI(fCO. 5949 Hollister Avenue GOLETA, CALIFORNIA 93117 OATS • (805) 683.1511 ATTENTI N I/ / TO 7� JC �� lj-SS�c I-}Tc,5 7 .5C A9 0�'�'+�� Cir L WE ARE SENDING YOU — Attached C Under separate cover via the following items: C Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order C COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION �I THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: Ue-For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ As requested ❑ Retumed for corrections ❑ Returncorrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS V COPY TO c/ L./� vL F" S1 '( +a if SIGNED: It enefosures an net as not*4 kkaft estNy us at V' CACOR RICHARDS CONSTRUCTION CITY OqATASCAOERO ADMINISTRATION UILDING PHASE IIC REMODEL CHANGE: ORDER REQUEST OF Revision # C nt.r•e}c: C 1i 0 14- ti: t. iuLl.Ca,� .�� :ES7aE rk3Ai�rl�nr r�� 51 !C ?1Pd'. N4 j 1%.�!?=- ---- AWI.'-�� (� I�.9G1 Il �f� (r.- �.r• ...0 J4) 1N� .__....._..rill•' _--.� �-.. r�' A VA t;srtt•t•al � ont:racCer Direct Labor w T & I ___._...._ %- of c Labor Material �._....._.._._._ ^•� �°� Gen . Conditions ( Equi=a . /Cxpensz-s ) Layout �______........__...._.._ ... __.. On--Site General and Administrative i , � � � � G^rieraa. contractor Subr_ot"i (A ) s. ... ......__... _.. _. Poe- tractors V a 715 _ - rO�A •o 4 • ___.. w._.._....�____. .._..._ .............._._ Subcontractor Subtotal ( 8) s_ Mark-Up For Subcontractor Work ( C ) o0 Subtotal A . B , & C -prdllr4-k District & Head Office Overhead 15% t! & Commission 10%' Bond Premium 4. _ ���.._... TOTAL COST -�9?�1=� the above quoted co<; r an t' xt•^. nsion is based on recciving appr-o-. 1 this change order by _ q, -. Any delay beyond that date n+�v increase the cost and requirtime extension . The time extension t '.y ; for this change order is __J� working days . — R . P . Richard*-_: resierves: the right to claim 017-1117•r co,_-. Lc and t:i.ntc. extensions because we cannot: determine the full impact. .if any . to construction schedule and resulting cost . mit this time . R . P . Richa,r?d. /Construction Co . OWNER APPROVAL Signed �• :' 1ed/ gn • 0 t:e . i f 1�� 0': '-e : ___ ®moi � ®�®®®�� R.P. RICHARDS 5949 oIONSARUCT�N CO. LrETTvenue a3 OO F �f'QC�[S90075A LL, GOLETA. CALIFORNIA 93117 " OATE JOa N0. 7 � � (805) 683-1511 ATTENTION' TO / ,`C C 1 it WE ARE SENDING YOU 2- ---Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order V coPtES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints Q,Ior review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS %7—/'-y SCH�`o cF r S ���5� o �•✓ .:-`ice: C✓c < �•i < ��d v&;Z AND F1 '2 C it iTc` CT 7- 7-/�/� �f .3 '.L / ' sc L✓ftt,,/ ,=7 P'-'-F c.i r1 i v-t Y- �C.s c • c✓?S ,.._I U N � '.l.� -,� �j G+1"�•nJ `' h l,y-f•�J c�� c c—.nrLr' COPY TO GA/ L.iEt3 X '1�� rI c'� ;i7�✓�� A4 SIGNED: it enc+osures are not as noted. kh"Hy notify us at once. '21 S y I Io o N 3 N m m CN n_ 0 ter O� r a U N � -4 in rn rh Q � N ) a Zf13 v -D o rn — N � ;. 3 70 (tel rn n n C = C > o z c r C Cn _ Z --4 U) C R.P. RICHARDS CONSTRUCT& CO. 5949 Hollister Avenue GOLETA. CALIFORNIA 93117 DATE 7 i -� � �. (805) 683-1511 ATTENTION R!: TOL-f-,7 J c_ f4o-77— � C I-1 TZ`S ;Z, U _rle-43 -1 1) WE ARE SENDING YOU Attached _ nder separate cover via the following items: Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION -7 i THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: Q-For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS � '�N�i'Tf77Z`-� ,•i �.�f / + vc. ��ti�i �crr/ 7 �3 �� ;� COPY TOdPra � - SIGNED: if s fnsurss an Trot as notod. kindly notUy us it Ones. Ej 05 RLi:(+rlt;(1'> C:rJi!'.• + a}Jt; t .1 ON 1:L' . C 1 I Y OF r5CAULR 1.) Auto 1 NJ ': I'R1) 1 .1 PHA'.;t J 1 (.: tit M01)1 ( CHANW: Lrt Uf K Ict. Q1JL %: f7} Joh Contract 4 Oate = - t �- g� Description : L' amt 21 General Contractor Uirect Labor :1. T & I Af5 % of Labor MateI.i"l. Gen . Conditions ( Ec4u1p . /1' xpn1'r•a(•:. ) ! Layout h On-Site Gencera l and Admirri�a tro t.ivr. General Con Lr acLcr •$ubt:otal ( A ) 3• � X09 Subcontractors 3 . ..�. __..._..._.. ..... } S . Subcontractor Subtotal (13 ) Mark-Up for Subc:onLraol.or blur!. (C) S•. Subtotal A . S . & C District: & 11r:rd V { ir:�• i!�/c r h' ►� ISX. & Commission 10% Ctond PremiLint TOTAL COST 1• 1147 �i The above quoted eoc L and 1.imc• :-x:vtrt•i ..r+ tt+.r•.t•d urr i c•ce•�. :irry approval of this change order by L. -17 -9 )1ny dcl .� bryond %nat date may increase the cot L and r(equi r e I,i mc• c x Lriit•i c+it rVkjL)j.r:•<I for this change order i-, 12— wvrl:inq dr•y• . ' R . P . Richardt rerser•vet, thv rir++rt to ! 1 .c1rn c+ Llrt•r• c•crt.t.•. end t:i.mE• extensions because we cannot. dete+rmirrc: thv lull if ;,ny , to the construction schedule and rue-ul Lrr-ict coc .i..•. . .;t. th — t. ilac' . P0* . Richards Const:.ructior, Co . 11WKR AF+NNUVAL Signed . Oate : I DATE -/ "� A DIVISION R. P . RICHARDS , INC . 1ma 5 G 17/ BY ESTIMATE SUMMARY JOB NAME < CHECK �-3d "` Ex Trz a Fi`�` C P � SHEET / OF� SECTION DESCRIPTION LABOR MATERIAL SUB/EQUIP . DESCRIPTION DETAIL QUANTITY UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT PRICE PRICE PRICE ee o At" +j� �Lr•. r i � v+ i 1 1 f ,yr"vo qy�r • i R . 13 ItlGI1A11U'y C:Oit .• IiWUTAON r:L . C1 I Y OF I;AUI: R I I AUM I N I ':'- I'Rf) I a N. 121-4 A'.: 1 I C 1%1 M01)1 t C14AN1;1: L,RIJ1: R RI. UtJ1. : 1 fr l Job li Contract 4 Oate L_{ -I-A� Description17 : ..�.`t�0 i,J «:.._. .. .y � ..iG� �?'<•4 A rr'`% v.F .�. -735. •�- 5, J f . A r. _. F -.i(74 r..,,��-'-;` Lk),4 Ltu0 rc. 5 O General Contr•acCor Uirert Labor f �L31)'a T & I •'f5 01 LaUor :f 45° Material Gen . Conditions (C14uip . /fxpP. rr3t ;. ) f Layout f• On—Site Genrcr•al and Admirri5tr'al.ivc i•.__ .. _. General CoritracLor $ubt;otal ( A ) 1 �p%q �' Subcontractors 3 . .._.. __..._..._... ..... 4 . :r Subcontractor Subtotal (i3) Mark-Up For SttIJuonLrac-- Lor War!. (G) i Subtotal A . E_ . & C �• Z � $� I District & Iltr.•rd U f i c:a• 15% & Commission 1O`a $ S&D z Etond PrNliriUnt 2.5 '/• TOTAL COST The, above quoted co<L and 1.im I .. tim., •d ori 1 c•c.c•i. :i!ry approval %1f this change order by 4-.17 -59 Arty dul .y boyond t,,oat date may increase the cotL and require Liruc• ; Itr timN r+xthrrs.ic111 r'c'ciu9.1 ;(1 for this change order is I Wor•icinq drys . R . P . Richards ressrrvr5 Lhc• ri %!Io1• to ! .ii In o1.lit-r• ctit-L•. ;ind t mne extensions because we cannot.. de te r mi me glee.• lull 1mpi.c1.. if ally . to the construction scheduIv and rusul Ljn(t . .t. t h 1 :. I. ime - Richards Construction Co . nWNtR AF'!•rROVA1. w I Signed . .. '�?1.&�_.._ ....__... . . . i<rnt•d , Oat.e : Vct.c: A DIVISION (* R. P . RICHARDS , INC . DATE BY ` L ESTIMATE SUMMARY JOB NAME �� �, SHEET-/-OFCHECK __1___� - SECTION DESCRIPTION LABOR MATERIAL SUB/EQUIP . DESCRIPTION DETAIL QUANTITY UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT PRICE PRICE PRICE ENE/Lo L 1:0in0^ic 1 l I I RLf.14Alrll' C:Ui!'.• ti(U1. l .It1N CLQ . C 1 1 Y OF t .CAUERr.► AarhINt ': I'Re-1r ! iiM tlJ 1)WA%;1• 1 ( C It M1)1)1 l CHANW: L,RtjV It i;l, QIJI. I h1 It•:vt•icct 11 .... .. Job 0 Contract 4 Date L•{ -i? -g 0esaription : ,4- (�r'� !ol �t J �/IN�L A � ..i_( c-E j72tLI I-V-f -fir=o._✓- -j..`'. . .J? ' . General Contractor Uirect Labor T & I •Y6 w of Labor :! 113— Material_� ;{• 4 Gen . Conditions ! Equip jt' xpht•r•(--. ) $ Layout b On-Site Genwr-al and Arilnir►i4tr olive. i•,_- .. _. General CorrtracLrr Subtotal ( A ) Subcontractor, 3 . ..-._ _...---._.. ..... Subcontractor Subtotal tl's} Mark-Up For SubconLrac- 1,01• alar!, ( C) a• Subtotal A . S . & C District & Ilr.►d Uf t i r.F• irv; r h� ,rS ISX. & Commission 10`3 o-)�o � Etond Prr+nriuni to-7 ' TOTAL COST f5ocu Tho above quoted cost and I,intc. approval of this change order by 4-17 Ate-y dclz=y beyond %liat date may increase the cc% L and requirle I.1mv v7one. iur, . 1 t(s ti.rnF tXLC111t.in1 1r.'gL1J.1'Vd for this change order isy wcr•1: i nq doy' . " •" R . P . Richards reftar•veh Lhc• ritshl. to tJ .rinr rr.hc•r• cac. t.•. Arid l:I.mc• extensions because- we cannot.. deter ►nirfc thc• lull if .:illy . to the construction schedulre and rusul Larr<I 1.1111t. t. irsrc• . Richards Construction Co . r)WNLR A!•'RIVUVAL 6 _I A DATE 3 A DIVISION R. P . RICHARDS , INC . BY i% ESTIMATE SUMMARY JOB NAME CHECK 2- SHEET / OF SECTION DESCRIPTION LABOR MATERIAL SUB/EQUIP . DESCRIPTION DETAIL. QUANTITY UNI UNIT UNIT UNIT PRICE PRICE PRICE i i - X19�1 - ' T'Z: 0 T"/r'f l C ! I OF rol"A U L' R A1)MIN.( ': I*R111 1 V N c:Uo .Ni� PHA•:;! t 1 (:: I%1 Iht)1)f ; CHANGI: LIRDI: k i;[. UUI. : Ct! Jon Contract 4 Date 44-I,5-� 3 Description . A�A. Y ,ter? 1 9 • f I General Contractor Uirect labor E• 2 �� � T & Y 'f 5._ " o1 Lahor Ma terial 6 _ Gan . Condition. ( Cquip . /t' xpa, r*ts :• ) E �9 � Layout t• On-Site Gent r•al and Admitri5t:r oLivr: General ContracLcr $ubtotall ( A ) 9• 5 ��� Subcontractor, 3 . _._ —_..._...._.. ..... 4 . Subcontractor Subtotal (es ) :E• 4 �� Mark-Up for SuUi;onLraGt,or blar', (G) a•, Subtotal A . S . & C 14 15-( District & Ilfro d U1 tic:u• iI•�r t tri ad ISXr & Commission 10% $ 3?SO - Etond Premium 2.5 •/. $ y�t$— TOTAL COST $ 183`tQ" Tho above quoted coc. L and Linio ,.x" it I t,N,., •cl oil l'C'CC').':irly approval of this change order by r-t- 17--zAtty dt.•l r,y bryond that date may increase the cost and rt-quirt• Limv %•x Li-nr• rtrrr . 1ttc• time vxLett¢•irm rC'qui.I'Cd for this change order- i-, 12-- workintJ '" R. P . Richard_•�' refier•vr*. the• rir+trt t.o ! J .tsnr rLitrr, C•nt.t.•. end t:mrttc• extensions because we cannot.. deteimitic t:ltc• lull if :ally , t:3 the - cOnStruction Schedule and rasul L.t nq voi-t•.•. , t;t. th r :. t. itttr . Richards Construction Co . OWNt R APPROVAL Signed . Date : DATE - � ^ A DIVISION t* R. P . RICHARDS , INC . -z�5, C I7 / f ' ESTIMATE SUMMARY JOB NAME CHECK �v P <, i3 ep-z SHEET_�OF� SECTION DESCRIPTION /02 '54 LABOR MATERIAL SUB/EQUIP . DESCRIPTION DETAIL QUANTITY UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT PRICE PRICE PRICE A- ,e{.77'.O:o / n ��/�< <i ,/fir ii. . �°'J /, ^►� 1 1 i 1 I D�''' ; z MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Through: Ray Windsor, City Manager From: Paul M. Sensibaugh, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Subject : Rotunda Carpeting and Permanent Seating Date : April 18, 1989 Recommendation: Staff recommends that the fourth floor rotunda be carpeted and that permanent seating be affixed. Background: The topic of the use of the Rotunda has come before Council many times in the past, and most recently Council adopted a rental policy that prohibited alcohol in City Hall . That action indirectly eliminated many of the social functions that would require a bare floor and portable seating in the Council Chambers. Additionally, there has been the installation of a new sound system, including speakers and acoustical panels that have enhanced the use of the Chambers as a public meeting place for committees and presentations by non-profit organizations. The improvement plans for the City Hall Renovation Project include carpeting of the fourth floor. Prior to proceeding with the general carpeting and painting, staff has sought the advice of a Professional interior designer for the selection of the proper color of carpet and paint to be used on a floor-by-floor basis . Any existing colors that do not fit into this scheme will be phased out as replacement is warranted. The hallway painting and carpeting, which is delt with seperately in the current and upcoming budgets, will also receive a recommendation from the interior decorator. Discussion: The placement of carpet may preclude certain uses for the Rotunda and lends the room to the installation of the permanent audience seats, which are stored in the basement, that were purchased from the County several years ago. These seats are generally in good condition and would be placed in such a manner as to coincide with the normal placement of portable seating, and would be installed in compliance with governing fire codes. (See sketch. ) The color of the seats will reduce the color options for the fourth floor covering and wall paint . The Club Room will also receive similar treatment, but could be a different color than the main floor, such as the gray used in the elevator and kitchen lobby. • The color of the Rotunda may or may not be a shade of gray, dependent upon the interior designer consultant suggestion. Staff is probably guilty of jumping the gun on the carpeting of the elevator area, mainly because it was thought that it was Council ' s desire to have that work done as quickly as possible . We will , of course, try to work that color into the scheme of the Rotunda. The color of the acoustical panels was not considered as a control since they are non-permanent fixtures and since they can be, and most likely will be, recovered in the future . Options : The time has finally come that a decision can be made on the future of the Rotunda space . Some options are more lasting than others and some may hinge upon the upcoming Pavilion decision. The Rotunda work is tentatively scheduled for July 21 through August 27, but the ordering of materials and the scheduling of the labor must happen soon. Also, some rooms which have undergone fairly recent cosmetic changes will be deleted from the contract, therefore, moving up the schedule for other work. Options available to Council include: (A) Carpet the Rotunda as called for in the Renovation plans, and permanently affix the seating to the floor. (Staff preference. ) (B) Carpet the floor but do not install the seating. (C) Delete the carpeting from the improvement plans, but install the seating. (D) Delete the carpet and do not install the seats. Each option has its advantages and disadvantages with respect to use and cost . The scenarios are too numerous to list and will be left open for Council discussion. Fiscal Impact : The cost of the carpeting is included in the bid for Room Renovations in the current City Hall Renovation Project . The cost of installing the seating is included in the 1989-90 CIP Budget under the line item of City Hall Projects. i • CLUB ROOM 0 O CITY COUNCtI. o oiu PODIUM o i � I 12 12 �L f2 i o 2J 0 Cl o o PRELIA41AIARY -L PROP0S ED • ELEV. FIXED 5EATIN&pts N- ROT�'I� SCALE: �"= 1 ' DA ROOM % 3EAT5 PROPOSED j04 POSE 18t-E • MEETI AGENDA DA'2� ITEM# — M E M O R A N D U M TO: City Council FROM: Finance Sub-Committee SUBJECT: Long-term Debt Financing DATE : April 18, 1989 Approximately three weeks ago, I indicated to Council that I in- tended to request a meeting of the Finance Committee in order to address and, hopefully, resolve several issues regarding long- term debt financing. These were specifically: 1. The timing of an issue of Certificates of Participation (C.O.P. ' s)? This is a key question under any circum- stances but became critical when staff learned that the bond market, reflecting the national economy, was be- ginning to fluctuate, raising concerns about the short- term future of interest rates, and particularly the aspect of a deteriorating market. 2. The actual amount of C.O.P. ' s to be recommended to Council? As you know, staff, in a desire to be totally forthright (conservative) about our ability to pay an annual debt that would come from existing revenue sour- ces and not cause either the need to reduce our present level of services and/or our having to seek new reve- nues (recognizing, as I have said all along, that no General Fund revenues over which the Council has direct control can be increased without a vote of the people) , had recommended that Council set a cap of $175,000 as an annual debt amount. This approach, while not unique, is certainly unusual inasmuch as the tradition- al approach to financing is to first determine how much you need to spend, and then determine how much it will cost on an annual basis. In light of the fact of what I have just said, together with the acknowledgment that this is the City' s first foray into debt financing, staff believes that the determination of how much we want to spend as annual debt is the more appropriate way to proceed. 3. Which projects should be specifically designated for financing, either partially or in whole, by long-term debt? Given Council' s recent action with respect to the adoption of a C.I.P. (Capital Improvement Program) , 1 this could be considered somewhat perfunctory but, nevertheless ; essential . 4 . Who should be retained as the financial consultant to assist us in putting the whole package together? As a result of a meeting of the Finance Committee and discussion of the issues outlined, the following answers and/or recommen- dations were made for transmittal to and action by the full Council : 1. Given the uncertainties of the bond market and the economy in general, that we proceed with debt financing through Certificates of Participation immediately. This could be accomplished by simple motion, but in light of the fact that there are still some unknowns related to the actual costs to be incurred and/or spec- ific dollars to be allocated, we would recommend that Council adopt the attached resolution, which specific- ally references the Lake Pavilion, the Police Facility and lake lots purchase. 2. In light of the data provided in Mark Joseph' s memo of April 14, 1989 , indicating that a total issue of $2,000,000 can be raised and paid for with a net aver- age annual payment of $169,600, we recommend that $2,000,000 be the designated amount. This is also covered in the resolution. 3. The resolution specifically designates the Lake Pavil- ion, Police Facility and lake lots purchase as stated earlier. 4. With respect to a financial consultant, please refer- ence Mark Joseph' s memo of April 17 , 1989, with attachment. We agree with Mark' s recommendation which, if concurred in by Council, should be acted upon by motion directing staff to enter into an agreement with First California Regional Securities, Inc. , for serv- ices, including llegal counsel, underwriting and trustee of funds, etc. , in conjunction with an issue of $2,000,000 of Certificates of Participation. It is anticipated that this process will take approximately 60 days . WINDSOR, City Manager ALDEN SHIERS, Councilmember BOB ILLEY ouncilmember 2 • M E M O R A N D U M To : Ray Windsor , City Manager From: Mark A. Joseph, Director of Admin. Services Date: April 14, 1989 Subject : Long-Term Debt Financing This memo attempts to clarify the "net average annual payment" concept used in the recap sheet at the Finance Sub-Committee April 5, 1989, meeting. Each financial proposal contains an annual debt service payment of interest and principal . Based on a $2,000,000 issue, at in interest rate of 7.596 percent , that annual payment averages $197,300 ( the exact annual payment varies from year to year ) . In addition, we can expect an estimated $1v500 in trustee fees annually. However , it is appropriate to deduct from this subtotal , the annual interest earnings from the reserve fund . • Based on a ten percent reserve fund, or $200,000 and _annual interest earnings of 9.6 percent, this represents $19,200 per year . Thus, the net annual expense is $179,600. Furthermore, the reserve fund itself can be used in the last 1 - 2 years to pay for the final installments. Although there are more sophisticated ways of calculating this benefit, for purposes of this memo , I have simply spread the $200,000 over 20 years to arrive at an average annual savings of $10,000. Accordingly, the final "net average annual cost" is only $169,600. To recapitulate: Average Debt Payment $197,300 Plus: Trustee Fees 1 ,500 Less: Reserve Fund Interest ( 19,200) Less: Prorated Reserve Fund (10.000) Net Average Annual Payment $169,600 Please let me know if I can offer any further assistance. As you know, interest rates are changing daily (up and down) , so the exact amounts will vary. MAJ:al \debtfina 0 • M E M O R A N D U M • To : Ray Windsor , City Manager From: Mark A. Joseph, Director of Admin. Services Date: April 17, 1989 Subject : Recommendations for Long-Term Debt Financing This memo outlines the reasons for my recommending Brad Kerwin, representing First California Regional Securities Inc . , to arrange for the debt financing of the Police Facility, Lake Pavilion and/or purchase of lots around the Atascadero Lake. After preliminary discussions with Council on January 31 , 1989, in which Mr . Kerwin was present , I began soliciting a number of proposals in order to ascertain what our likely costs would be if Council chose a long-term debt financing option. Five companies were contacted , and four companies responded . First California, Access Leasing, Security Pacific , and the League of California Cities ' California Cities Financing Corporation supplied us with six different strategies and/or proposals. Merrill Lynch declined to submit an offer . After reviewing each proposal , it appeared that the top two options were the League ' s pooled bond issue (with a Baa rating) and Mr . Kerwin' s private bond issue (unrated) . The attached excerpt from the California Debt Advisory Commission summarizes the pros and cons of each approach. With these issues in mind , I believe Brad is the best choice, given the current situation. The direct cost savings of the League is offset by the flexibility of a private issue. Second , Brad can initiate the funding process almost immediately. Because there is a temporary inversion of rates ( long-term interest rates are lower than short-term) , acquiring the funds early will actually generate a modest amount of surplus interest revenue. Finally, Brad offers the City a personalized approach , indicated at least in part by the fact that he has already given the City a considerable amount of his own time on this project , at no cost to the City. This last issue is of particular benefit to me. I have never been directly involved in a debt-financing , and would prefer a company that can provide as much direct assistance as possible. For the reasons outlined above, I recommend a $29000,000 issue, paid back over 20 years, using Brad Kerwin as our financial advisor . Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns regarding this matter . MAJ:al • \debtfina 2. Dedicated Pools (Also Known as Designatea or 5tructurea Pools) : Dedicated pools are single debt issues where the participants, projects, and bond proceeds to be received by each participant are known and can be easily identified at the time of issuance. Dedicated pools may be issued through a JPA, NPC or State Agency. Individual public agencies have several options for participating in dedicated pools: (a) Create a new JPA of agencies interested in participating in a dedicated pool issuance; (b) Participate in a JPA or NPC created by an association of public entities which issues dedicated pools. The Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) , the County Supervisors Association of California (CSAC) and the League of California Cities (LCC) are examples of public agency associations which have created a JPA or NPC to issue dedicated pools on behalf of members; (c) Participate in an existing JPA of public agencies which • has previously issued dedicated pools and which is willing to issue additional dedicated pools for previous and/or new participants. (d) Participate in a pool administered by a State Agency. Advantages: Potential advantages include reduced costs of issuance, lower interest rates and other cost savings through economies of scale; greater name recognition; easier market access; availability of sophisticated financing structures; and • i ability to obtain credit enhancement. Public agencies with limited debt issuance expertise, or which access the market infrequently or which have relatively small (less than $5 million) capital requirements can consider debt issuance as an option when it may not otherwise be viable. An advantage to the JPA/NPC administering the pool may be revenues received in the form of administrative fees charged to borrowers that participate in the pool. Disadvantages: A commonly-cited disadvantage is timing. All participants must have their projects ready at the same time to enter into an obligation with the dedicated pool. For example, bid estimates and financing documents for each participant's project must all be in an equal state of readiness. Public agencies with projects ready to go may have to slow things down to wait for other participants in the pool, potentially eliminating some of the cost saving advantages of pooling. For example, construction costs or interest rates might rise while the public agency that is ready to go waits for the other participants in the pool. Public agencies with projects in the planning stages may be pressed to meet the pool's timeline, which may be difficult for an agency with little or no debt issuance • expertise. Differences in individual participant's credit risks must also be considered. Without credit enhancement, the credit rating and market perception of the pool will be only as strong as the participant with the lowest credit rating. The pool may also have specific credit rating requirements for participants, eliminating the ability of some agencies to participate in the pool. Administrative fees and other costs associated with participating in the pool (e.g. , meeting credit enhancement requirements, administrative fees paid to the JPA or NPC) may equal or exceed the participant's savings on interest rates or other debt issuance costs. i • RESOLUTION NO. 24 -89 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO RELATING TO DEBT FINANCING WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City Council in behalf of the community to undertake needed capital improvements and/or land purchase; and WHEREAS, in light of the fact that the only feasible and realistic way that said needs can be met in a timely fashion is through long-term debt financing; and WHEREAS, it is the City' s conviction that long-term debt financing can best be accomplished through Certificates of Parti- cipation (C.O.P. ' s) because,, among other things, this financing method allows greatest flexibility in the use of existing General • Fund revenues; and WHEREAS, the projects identified to be undertaken through debt financing and/or a combination of debt financing and other revenue sources, if needed, are the proposed Lake Pavilion, Police Facility and lots adjacent to Lake Park; and WHEREAS, even though the City Council has yet to specifi- cally allocate the exact amount of money to be spent on these projects, pending further review of each one following bidding and land appraisal, it is anticipated that all three could, and probably will, exceed two million dollars ($2,000, 000) ; and WHEREAS, in recognition of the volatility of the existing bond market and the uncertainty of interest rates in the future, it is the Council Finance Sub-Committee' s recommendation that the City move quickly to secure long-term debt financing through Cer- tificates of Participation immediately, with the understanding that said issue shall be deposited with a banking trustee to await their use within the 1989-90 fiscal year, at such time as the City Council shall decide upon the amounts to be allocated for the projects identified. NOW, THEREFORE, it is the express desire of the City Council to authorize the immediate pursuit of Certificates of Participa- tion in an amount of two million dollars ( $2,000, 000) to be used in=pert—er-in- whole for any one of the projects herein identi- fied. �r 1 (Resolution No. 24 -89, cont Id) On motion by Councilmember seconded by Coun- cilmember , the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted on the following roll-call vote: AYES: NOES: . ABSENT: ADOPTED: ATTEST: BOYD C. SHARITZ, City Clerk BONITA BORGESON, Mayor • APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: JEFFREY G. JORGENSEN RAY WINDSOR City Attorney City Manager �I • 2 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FINANCING ALTERNATIVE MUNICIPAL BORROWING METHODS This purpose of this report is to provide a brief review basic capital financing alternatives which may be available to the City; provide a brief description of each which would discuss the pertinent items such as costs, timing, requirements, availability, known constraints, and their applicability. The specific financing methods to be reviewed include the following: (a) Certificates of Participation, (b) General Obligation Bonds, (c) Revenue Bonds, (d) Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Bonds, (e) Marks-Roos Bonds, (f) Special Assessment District Bonds, and (g) Landscaping and Lighting District financing. Items not covered in this discussion would be either state or federal grants or loans. CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION Certificates operate like a lease transaction and can be issued in a short period of time by Council Resolution. No vote of the electorate is required to approved either the funding or the project(s) . Typically the proceeds of the sale of the Certificates are used to acquire and or construct a project, such as a building, park, equipment, etc. The City borrows this capital for its project(s) and pledges to annually budget and appropriate the necessary funds to make the lease payment. Lease payment coincide with the debt service on the borrowed funds. At the end of the lease, the City owns the property being leased. Should the City fail to make lease payments, Certificate holders have recourse to a Reserve Fund that is funded by the Certificate issue. They would also have other remedies, including rights to the leased property, to insure that they would get paid. Certificates provide no revenue source with which to pay the debt service and are not a viable alternative unless the City can provide funds from some other source that can be made available to pay debt service. Certificates have the advantage that, if funds can be made available to pay debt service, they can move forward quickly, without the time and expense of- an election. Certificates may or may not be rated, depending upon the strength of the issue and whether it makes economic sense to do so. GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS A General Obligation Bond requires a 2/3 voter approval of the general electorate for both the issuance of the debt and the tax with which to pay that debt. It has the advantage over Certificates in that, if it goes forward, it produces the necessary revenue to pay the obligation. However, it takes • longer to do because of the time and expense of election process. A G.0. may or may not have a Reserve Fund and may or may not be O �5- $9MOD! ...._ • MEMORANDUM 0 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Through: Ray Windsor, City Manager From: Paul M. Sensibaugh, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Subject : Recycling Date : April 19, 1989 Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City become involved in some level of recycling effort and that a Recycling Committee representing a wide crosssection of the community be formed. Staff also recommends that the initial direction of the committee be the preparation of a scope of involvement and the establishment of goals to be presented to Council for their approval . Background: Councilperson Mackey serves on the Solid and Hazardous Waste Management Committee at the County level . Recycling is an important part of that committee ' s function and goals. The State has directed that all counties will reduce the amount of waste to landfills by 25% by 1990 . The City must be a part of some form of recycling and, indeed, may be the catalyst to get the community involved in a volunteer program that will accomplish -the State 's goal . Discussion: Our City government has been involved in recycling paper to a limited extent and the Public Works Department plans to publicize those efforts during National Public Works Week in May. In order to accelerate this effort, more publicity should be promoted community— wide . By reaching out to the School District, the State Hospital and local printers who are probably the other major paper generators in the City, the community as a whole could have an impact on waste reduction. Bill Gibbs of Wil—Mar Disposal has investigated the commercial viability of recycling and has found that a recycler in San Miguel will receive cardboard; we also know that Paper People in San Luis will buy white paper and ECO SLO will buy glass, newspapers, etc. , • as will Lorin Heilman and the Country Market . The more material that is collected, the more economical the effort will become, and thus, the more successful the goals will be. 0 • The Council needs to determine how much effort the City wants to put into the recycling concept . Some early efforts could include, but are not limited to, forming a committee, conducting a public survey, initiating a trial project, passing a Waste Reduction Policy and adopting a Waste Reduction Resolution. Attached are several informational tid-bits which are a small portion of the myriad of literature on the subject of recycling. Also attached is a copy of the estimate that Wil-Mar Disposal did for the purchase and pickup of small , colored recycling bins. Fiscal Impact : There is no estimate of City costs at this time and any such costs will be a reflection of the amount of involvement in the program. A 5 Or W C y O .0 a+ ate. •C C •ie •^ V — '" i. 4! O os R � h C < `o.�a m °o o � � ,�, u � o C C R i C Q b0 i O u » v ,� L` yc� v ea 6J C � V V 3 "' � r LT.� r � Q � o►� eo° •c � y goo � � •ti � 3 g v y y «s to y C Q C =+ n • O q - n vj r .V. A V1 u h b0 9 � H v' wj o .V N Etv 6.. a: a > c Now cc W2 Cc cc bo Cc Qd PR n.cc _ L ti cn Poo E �/ � � 'X = es 5c O _ '` � � Cep•. :uo c^ G v �. ^ N G C3 L+ Qj ac 00 bo 0-0 Pkloo�. •;� r � 'N Q, ^ •_ be � L � r � � •A 4J L ar � v "71J _ ie Gn w `\ IOK i W 7�� .1 • y cv �. VU ... a r O C v L Gel r, V fn v C C L N C L Y u O G ` �0 O .r � C A CJ O > •61 ^• 4J 'O CL i V N •(' C w O V .V. fL' v 6J f3 G L 6J V NO b0 U y � � = c: 'O = '7 ^ eC U to C fE r bQ C V C V O R h � H 6r r0 fC .z F '> 4) u ? u L' y 7 C C C :. : >. ee y Nbo L v 3 r- C Mon c v y in u u G U = 3 3 y c u p N O N Q O bA O y V N M 4jC v ._ C. C r'y O N `� R'' O V 6) L O r C `r ^ •+ e^4 '� .J cz G '3 In ea u rC y u V y .y O ;� ` ^ C '� w V v n,Cyl •C u ,9 C11 J LQ„ N ti V Jb0 •3 C G. v w N t� A� r .Y s'•' � � �. as �0 u C C '�G s C t7 O y of C y C0 >, ONO I C- Gi. '� � _�•L � .� L. r tSl � � N I.. L Lw- to N cu :0.4 . C c.. cC R J s T-- � y ti •, aC X " 6J � 6J i � L � U y 6" 3 •y _ ai L fC � � � 0� ,,,� .+ ^ C X E y ` GtC "d y =. v y 3 OCr- xn OM CLJ v y •v � R � 4: v � c.. CJ � C C r. � c •v C L y C O GJ T C a y OC .. v ri C ^ C V C Gd F. bb p y v V L ^ v dC u — v � °' _ O E 3 �. c •�, v ee v y L a� =U :0 CQ M cC to; C — :. ti •V .4J K% C �. ap 3 L h' — 4y'. 4c. L C L ''' v: •O V C ` L •N y i.� v% QJ r, U 'y C.� ""' ,G "' ^Q CEJ• y bou C = — v r y v C = y y .. •� U C ,� y 4J y y 4J = y CJ •tJ ^ a y c 3 a= c L >. c vc v c v v ea r = 3 = y E c. ti ti c a� X ' ea v aui C 6. v V C 3 = vs C v, co c v E Cr v u u ca R A r b - a°oho• o 40 S r y r N. ..r• y.Ef w+L J • ` J V cn coi N ". •v L .0 Cj y �. Q1 GJ fC r h U U L y C L: L Gi 0J u Xgn b0 C rA U C U I r ti n^. U r •N ^ R tE U f v •� V _ d ro rI � � � r L V � y v � � r U •U � y ^ U y J w r ft: �' �. y •� N ^' y. 130'- cz '; L. C Q,J lv rr+ U y r. fC N ^ L :d � . y v r bj,• C bo CU O y G O C Q v y = = 'r •C v ^ L C O v r. ce C C ^ _'C O 3 C C = o u C v L be v :3zi v c = y CJ C . BE _ �i r Cl N O C y r. Vii JL. N GAJ `H 6J �^ ct F•1 � L � :S� .ter � �. �^. .� t� > L '.i� �r. � lC :r '> i/� Q. .� ?� L iG rJ •L Qj IJ v O ca v C u . ' u -QJ cs c � •� a't3 � .� 4: as � o v = ^ c � � � O C ba ca L O, ea V ca - h C C tLo cr y '3 i x 'L O .S ` .. r • W �c�� r� NOW V v y c0 It �''.'� 1'�-i L •� .'�.. •50 T y y y •V O � � V V 4J n - C of yu�j t O —y�j 6-.1 �,•G G � � � G � y � C h •�,ti O u � v y b �_ = L n L •� �� L V G v O � ti 0VJ y V .r U '� � C y C C4 •� J fC �" -' C v L ` � � y bjO yV, L � `� O ^ v � bA 3 � h 3 v C � cr aL,' � '� � � � �•b0 rG O C V U {,J v '� y ray' G ?. � y y � •C L .^ � O Vv! � O _ b C — an •— u G v e 7 ' (L• Z W bO p y p v H C bD'� bbC bC a? bA O Ca V ? C C b0 � L^. C N O u G t• 1•-f ` '� C � •` v 4 L .0 i v •_ � .v �`� v C ee ti � 3 ie G C t4 4 bD ti `/ `ryy' ''' •� td .0 'O �G of G .V y, .7 V .V C C ^ L ++ bA 'V L A V L3. EtGC C U V ti •^ rOu� J Li �"' yJ y0,• y L ^ f/� 1/" OJ L `./ = cz41 �+ 7L7 L yy N v V H ^ •> •' ..r •� C = L C v •^ C V U h d.0e—a v 46deo e U aG+ e� 'ved >% v _ v H ba M qj qj 'L '.! •tAQ C C ^ N + }+ 'O `+ �..•� mr •��.•. fn—Q ..r J 'rn C 3 v ti v 'r bo cc .V !� wG L L V .nr H L t• �• ccp vi C vL = 3 u �+v ti 411 L of :J CL v L n ® Vl Ucc vi - v L bA y ryLr R C •� v NJ �, •`� of V 4r of 'L N >•.•�• U •L fC •� r v p C v �, v cc v -V .1% 5 C O = h � T y S: v r V ^ � C v � u1 U L U v � U v y V r .� — b^O L = � •., .CCi ^ '..+ ,C v �•' .0 � � ce .� bA= ti � c V e - - - H r Qj L •4; C G .y ^ e 3 G v v u u .W —6. A ® L v v (� n v 'V L Fes•, ^ r Lam. go V h L r r fC d) bQ L v 4J Vbo L L .� R ,� •V +^. 'n O yV, 'vf SC C 'L c4 C v Q v V C "• w 1 ¢' ti "` a i :� T'o Q, v V r v j C ,� C_ 3 H. C �4 vU • O bG O u n� .0 � R C C v 3 v ` H Z u V a� = v n v u H v h :+ bA v •-V• rL. v `•i i Win•. ?. •L y L _ ? _ Zi = '3v v �./ v v ea V 3 5p O — ^ 5 ` = boC ;n L C �� C Q L V O.r .— � .v h .^— G•� U r i. r'r .n.. ^ � h � V �.: U cC 'r C �. .,,, - eE y Z 61 -•C A r, y Z C u y = a9o�, � LJ � I., fn O L u u •— ee u y S d. t CID v C C E i a. L v = E L 3 `}°. y y `" cc y u O v w a' u U u p 'C U v a3i .0 . ® V V '' V v ee G C ce L Z C .i y M C •p 2 a ao W v C.V E• w 4 C O u C a is i u 0 7 C y C O �� O '�. C �E v. V .. 6a —�, 0. 0 0.'E C toy �•i� C C. a O < u s '� a`"i i c v 3 C �..� a! H " .4 e h •� �= O O •� O a' .` C 'Q v O -C ea •E 3 Z ee v ® u v % °' A Q °' es .0 v .�! '� y 0. E �v R y C e4 C » C y y 4 _, L O E T+ Z .V rn O E i a Z e '° `� ea .Q v :r .� "' •�+ C C „ ° = o A E 'k (.� w e E v '" •: L .; v y C Q A � `� O r' r " a.0 � v est � � :.' Q _ s 'co °' ° R � � � � kE � `„`°"` '� � _ ° •� o UEc. =° Ea cci 3 eye y u `a v �0..AC O O �c! O C •» v . Vl .0 iV. V E .� 3 4 —% U u .0 Q V 4 L ev O L ee V F '� ee'i U Q1 V 67 L •"i cz E _� y a� •y � E C __ ._ �, c. V6. .. C M •c; v rn r. v; , V :r = ccz C>0 OJ R r, 4J _ba 7 ® f ba rr6. cl m cu Qj r� •. . , ti�a �� / vim`. K•J' � �..� � kms: � �� J �-�� y.�.v k °�� T ,x r 3 y.� 3 a'r t 2 f_ t }v7 Sr-"- �', iy � �' 2 + k � �, ����,- � iii , .1 �� ; s r ,ti ,-�. {� • �. z �. #. , f� -,' � r �,'� _ .. �' tri� p.�,•� ��� ��`a����l'� `1J•�f•�:, _�. �. �� � ' .•� .� - A. . .:a.'_' b f RECYCLING . A LOCAL SOLUTION � TO THE SOLID WASTE CRISIS Getting Started **DRAFT** A publication of The Local Government Commission 909 12th Street, Suite 205 Sacramento, CA 95814 Assistance provided bv: Recycle America: A Waste Management Company California Resource Recovery Association State Department of Conservation, Division of Recycling • LOCAL GOVERNMENT RECYCLING PROGRAMS • GETTING STARTED RECYCLING--ISN'T IT OLD NEWS? Recycling isn't new. For centuries, people have reclaimed scarce materials in times of crisis. Since the start of the Industrial Revolution, scrap metals and waste paper have been recycled in large quantities by private industry. Prior to the introduction of packing trucks in the 1950's, garbage companies throughout the state were known as "scavengers", as they recycled much of the wastes they collected. For several decades, a portion of the used tires and motor oil generated in this country have been recycled. Since Earth Day in 1970, several hundred communities nationwide have established residential curbside recycling programs. So,what's the problem? Statewide,we Californians are still burying almost 90%of our municipal solid waste in landfills. Along with that waste,we are burying energy equal to millions of barrels of oil which could otherwise be saved in the manufacture of new products:we are providing a potential source of contaminants which could pollute our groundwater tables and form toxic gases to seep into the atmosphere 4 not property controlled. At the same time, local opposition to landfills have brought siting efforts to a virtual haft. As if these problems were not enough,our existing landfill capacity is virtually exhausted. Most cities and counties will run out of space in existing landfills within the next ten years. WHAT ARE WE THROWING AWAY? According to the California Waste Management Board,we dispose of nearly 1.5 tons of waste per person every year. That means each of us throws away about seven pounds of garbage per day. Although the exact ingredients of local garbage vary by place and time,the experts say that our garbage looks roughly Ike this: Paper and Cardboard 36.6% M Yard Wastes 17.8% 0 Glass 9.9% Q Metals 9.9% ti ® Food Wastes 7.9% Plastics 6.9% Wood 4.0% t•1•r•f•h �•�•�•�•�•�• ® Other 6.9% l r 1 1 1!1 r 1�1�1�1 i'�1~M• ti•b•ti•�•ti•ti•1,•ti•1• r•�•r•r.�•r•r.f•: �tiK•ti•�•ti•ti•�•4'ti b• •r•r r••!•.I•�•r•r•j 1•I•r 1.1.1•HM1 4•ti•ti•ti••••�•ti•�• •tiiti•tii�i•+•� The fraction of our waste composed of paper and plastic continues to grow. By the year 2000, it is projected that paper and plastic will comprise over half the waste stream. According to the Consumer Environmental Council,packaging materials account for a third of our waste. i WHAT SHOULD WE DO ABOUT IT ? • In order to make a serious dent in future landfill requirements, each local government will need to develop a comprehensive waste reduction strategy, attacking each stage of the production and consumption cycle,so that ultimately less waste will need to be buried The highest priority should be to reduce the amount of waste which is created in the first place (Waste Avoidance). Waste which cannot be avoided should then be reused or recycled wherever feasible (Source Separation,Material Recovery Facilities, Composting). Only when these approaches are exhausted should local governments tum to more controversial means,such as incineration,for reducing landfill requirements. An effective waste reduction program must focus on all of the largest sources of municipal waste: 'Commercial waste 'Yard waste 'Residential recyclable paper,glass and metals. Recycling programs should concentrate on recapturing materials which can be resold. Local government should work to attract to the community manufacturers who will make use of recycled materials. In addition, in their own purchasing decisions, local governments should favor the procurement of goods made from recycled materials. • For many local governments, an effective program will require rejecting traditional approaches to the management of solid waste. Decision makers must reexamine the economic incentives faced by landfill operators, haulers and consumers in deciding whether to recycle something or throw it away. Program managers must be given the status and access to elected officials which is commensurate with the management of a crisis. In subsequent guidebooks, we will focus on some of the major elements of a comprehensive waste reduction strategy. In those guidebooks,we wig emphasize the importance of the following activities: I. Commercial Recycling, because, in most cities and counties, businesses account for over half of the waste. In addition many businesses use a significant amount of high grade white and computer paper, two of the most valuable materials for secondary. use. 2. Residential Curbside Recycling, because it is the most visible,.most fundamental. means for public education and a cultivation of a recycling.ethic in our cities and counties. 3. Yard Waste Composting, because yard waste accounts for over 20% of the volume in most municipal lar dfiiis.- 4. Government Procurement Policies, because the success of our waste reduction, efforts will hinge on our ability to cultivate a market for secondary, materials. A vigorous coordinated, region-wide government procurement effort may, be a major factor in: sparking new markets- 0 GETTING STARTED • Regrettably, there is no magic formula for effectivety reducing solid wastes. If there is one universal truth, however, it is that traditional waste management strategies and responsibilities have not places enough emphasis on reducing waste. What is required is a different kind of political commitment by elected officials, a new institutional mandate for staff managers and a deeper understanding of the economics of waste. Here is a collection of steps which have proven of benefit in some cities and counties: 1. The Waste Reduction Resolution The council or board needs to form its commitment to a comprehensive assault on solid waste in logical steps. It can't agree to specific program elements, budgets and personnel levels until it has adopted clear and achievable policy goals. A Waste Reduction Resolution gives the council or board a vehicle for formally recognizing the nature of the solid waste crisis and agreeing, in general terms,on the type of local government effort needed to meet the crisis. A model resolution is included as an appendix to this guidebook. Regardless of the precise words or form of the resolution,certain concepts need to be conveyed: a. There is a solid waste crisis. -Close-in landfill capacity is almost exhausted -Poorly managed solid wastes may be contaminating our soil and groundwater and poQu M our air. -By either burying or burning our wastes, we are destroying non-renewable resources and adding significantly to the amount of energy needed to produce new products. • b. local government must respond to the crisis by striving to meet certain goals: -An over-all reduction in the weight or volume of waste being buried in local landfills by a certain percentage within a certain number of years. -The establishment of a Comprehensive Waste Reduction Program which will seek to: Avoid the creation of waste wherever possible (by fostering responsible manufacturing practices and informed consumer choice), Retrieve as many materials from the waste stream for reuse or recycling as is economically feasible, Develop a greater market for the purchase and use of products made from recycled(secondary) materials Encourage greater use of secondary materials by local manufacturing businesses,and Introduce, into the community, new manufacturing businesses which will make use of secondary materials. The achievement of consistency and greater effectiveness in the use of applicable ordinances, plans, permits, rates and budgets to help meet the waste • reduction goals.. C. Local government should commit itself to take certain key steps to help meet its goals: • The creation of a citizen advisory committee to advise the council or board on the specific steps to be taken. The development of a Waste Reduction Strategy,to be approved by the council or board and updated annually to meet changing circumstances. This strategy, as adopted, will form the basis for program planning budgets. 2. Citizen Committees For better or for worse, a subject-related citizen committee provides a voice for a particular set of public concerns. A citizen committee on solid waste management will help assure that the council or board will be responsive to solid waste issues in a timely manner. If its membership is balanced, the committee can make relevant expertise available to decision makers and help determine the type of program that the public needs and wants. 3. Opinion Surveys and Waste Composition Studies An effective waste reduction strategy should be tailored to the characteristics of the community. One would not expect to find the same waste composition in Gilroy, a rural community, that one would find in Sunnyvale in the Silicon Valley. The waste composition is likely to vary by season, as well. At the same time, the residents in those cities might have very different attitudes towards waste reduction and • recycling. Experts disagree as to which type of information is most important. Some say that public opinion is the highest priority;before designing a curbside recycling program, it is important to know why people are not recycling now and what would be most likely to tum them around, Others say that you have to know more about the waste stream in order decide where to target a community's waste reduction dollars. In either event, a program is more likely to succeed 9 it is sensitive to local circumstances. In addition, reliably collected information will help persuade decision makers of the need for certain types of programs. For these reasons,data collection should be made a high priority. 4. Waste Reduction Strategy While the Waste Reduction Resolution announces the council or board's commitment to a comprehensive solid waste program, the Waste Reduction Strategy spells out the elements of that program. Just like the Resolution, the Strategy should be presented to the council or board for its approval. It can be updated and reintroduced annually to reflect the need for flexibility and adaptation as the program develops. The Strategy should identify specific program elements as they relate to the overall goals, predict the waste reduction levels to be achieved from each program element, and state what each part of the program will cost The Waste Reduction Strategy should be reviewed and approved by the council or board prior to consideration of the budget for a given year. In this way,decision makers will have formed a commitment to a specific level of activity for the waste reduction program before having to consider how to fund it in the • competitive environment of the government-wide budget process. An example of a Waste Reduction Strategy adopted in the City of San Jose is attached as an appendix to this guidebook. 0 5. The Budget Process • Although the Waste Reduction program will have to compete with all other governmental priorities during the budget process, the chances for adequate funding will have been improved with prior approval of the Waste Reduction Strategy. Success during the budget process can also be enhanced if direct program activities (such as collection and processing of-materials to be recycled) can be completely supported by garbage collection fees and revenues from the sale of recycled materials. It will be easiest to receive general fund support for program implementation and oversight expenses, the kind of costs which may remain stable,or even reduce over time. A suggested order of activities in the budget process would be as follows: Identify needs for the next fiscal year's budget. Prepare a draft Waste Reduction Strategy to serve as policy to guide budget considerations. Estimate rates and revenues for the fiscal year. Finalize the Waste Reduction Strategy. Adopt rates. Adopt a budget. 6. Hiring the Best and Giving Them Clout Waste reduction program managers will have to function in a system in many cities, that has not traditionally supported their activities. To the extent to which public works departments have been involved with soli waste in the last few decades, they have been concerned with making sure garbage is collected and disposed of, but not necessarily recycled. Generally, there has been no institutional • mandate to avoid the generation of waste, reuse materials wherever possible, and aggressively recycle. Although Resolutions and Strategies should help,they are not likely to change attitudes overnight. For these reasons, it is important to see that program managers are hired who understand and believe in the waste reduction ethic. In addition, if may be necessary to change the management structure to improve access to decision makers. Some cities or counties have created new teams, within the offices of the Chief Administrative Officer or City Manager to manage solid waste programs (for example, San Francisco). Others have created new offices, such as San Jose's Office of Environmental Management. Still others have decided that the waste reduction program needs to be managed from within the Public Works Department,.so that all of those responsible for solid waste can be involved in establishing the'new traditions". THE MANY FORCES DEFINING SOLID WASTE POLICY CRRA's State Recycling Policy and Programs hichligbts that in addition to state laws and regulations affecting collection and disposal activities, the solid waste management system which governs in a, . particular locality is defined by the interaction of all of the following:: City and Cbunty OtcF( aces; Collection and Disposal Contracts or Fftchisesi Sold Waste Faddy Permis: City and County Solid waste and General Plans; Zoning Ordinances; Capital and Operating Budgets; Residential and Cbmmercial Rate Stn=res; • Normally, these rules and restrictions are developed on a piecemeal basis, reflecting technical and economic perceptions at the time each piece is adopted. In developing a comprehensive waste strategy, local governments face the challenge of looking at each provision in light of current circumstances and determining whether or not the available tools are being used to maximize the incentives for waste reduction. UNEARTHING THE FULL COST OF DISPOSAL Some argue that a recycling program should only be undertaken if it pays for itself. This is an interesting proposition, since no one suggests that a traditional waste management programs should pay for itself. Others suggest that a recycling program should only be undertaken if it does not cost more than the cost it helps avoid. The "avoided cost" method of program planning makes sense to be certain. If a recycling program would be a less expensive means of eliminating certain wastes, then it is hard to explain why it should not be done. However, an avoided cost analysis only provides a meaningful comparison if one has accurately identified the full costs of each option. The cost of a recycling program may be simple to calculate. Consider a hypothetical curbside recycling program: Pmaram Costs Revenues Neta=m Administration (from sales Labor of recycled (Program Costs)-•(Revenues) Equipment materials) • Materials However, calculating the costs that are avoided by keeping recyclable materials out of a landfill is not so simple. Many common terms related to soli waste do not necessarily have commonly understood definitions. These complications have led to franchise infringement lawsuits concerning who has the right to collect recyclables. Cities and counties can clarify in both contracts and ordinances these definitions to foster a competitive recycling environment regardless of the nature of the design of their franchising system. Should landfill capacity be defined in weight or volume? When are materials reused? When are they recycled? When are they salvaged? A study was prepared for Santa Clara County, for instance, to provide them with working definitions. After the effects of the waste reduction effort are calculated, there are still a number of assumptions must be made about the costs related to landfill collection and disposal. It is easy to see that recycled materials will not be collected as wastes and will not be placed in a landfill. Some would look no further and argue that the avoided cost of a recycling program is equivalent to the sum of current avoided collection cost and landfill costs,which are often hard to clearly identify due to the way contracts are structured or costs are changed to different departments or activities. However,this ignores other costs to the conumnity which are not as easy to calculate,such as: 1. Future Landfill Costs Every time a ton of waste is buried in a landfill, it creates a need for a ton of additional capacity in a future landfill Future costs for land and for the protections necessary to guard against pollution are certain to be higher than they are today. 2. Environmental Costs • If not property managed, leachate from soli waste landfills can carry toxic chemicals and bacteria into the soil and groundwater tables. Methane and toxic gases are generated in 0 landfills and can seep into the atmosphere, causing hazards and unpleasant odors. Landfill space is taken out of productive use for decades, sometimes permanently. There are also questions about liability for problems that may occur after a landfill is closed. At a minimum, the presence of a landfill impacts the aesthetic values of a community. As landfills are sited in more remote areas, transportation requirements multiply, more fossil fuel is consumed, and more air pollution results. How can we place a dollar figure on these"economic externalities"? One method is to estimate the cost of the best means available to overcome each problem. Sophisticated landfill"liners" may limit the potential for groundwater contamination. Systems may exist which could recover some or all of the landfill gases for energy production. The potential reduction in real estate values in the community surrounding a new landfill can be estimated. The cost of a new landfill site can be estimated base on historical trends in real estate values. Although the calculation of such external factors can hardly be precise, including these costs does provide for a more realistic assessment of the value of a recycling or waste reduction program. It is inappropriate to reject a waste reduction program solely because an overly simplistic cost analysis suggests that it is not worthwhile. If data or analytical tools are not available to quantitatively analyze these externalities, a simpler approach for local governments would be to acknowledge these factors, and consider recycling programs to be"economic"even it they are slightly more expensive in the short term. RETHINKING CONTRACTS FOR COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL Many cities and counties make use of private firms in one or more of the components of traditional soli waste management: • Aardfill Ownership -Landfill Operation -Waste Collection Carefully drawn contracts may provide incentives for such private firms to promote waste reduction. Often,contract rates are determined on a"cost plus"basis. Finns justify requests for future rate increases by extrapolating from a previous years costs and adding in a margin of profit. A "cost plus" contract encourages business as usual. However, a fixed cost, multi-year contract may unleash creative efforts to Promote waste reduction. For instance, the private owner of a landfill site who has negotiated a fixed price, "put or pay' multi-year contract would be anxious to take steps to prolong the life of the landfill. In this case,the landfill operator has some certainty of revenues regardless of how much waste is actually put into the ground. If some of the materials sent to the landfill could be sorted and diverted from landfill in a cost effective manner, then such a landfill owner would have the incentive to do so. 9 the sorted materials could be sold for a profit, all the better. If competition for the contract to operate a landfill is a possibility,firms could be required to include in their proposals recycling services, such as curbside collection, material recovery at transfer stations, neighborhood collection centers, and landfill site sorting. This may prove to be an especially effective method for recapturing useful materials, as it provides access to commercial as well as residential waste. For instance, in its contract with the City of San Jose, International Disposal Corporation (a landfill owner and operator) agreed to set aside a portion of its landfill site for a Waste Reduction Center, to be operated by the contractor, for sorting, recycling and composting municipal solid waste. The contractor will own any • materials recycled at the site. The contractor also agreed to use any compost developed at the site, or elsewhere by the city,as cover material for the landfill. • On the collection end, recycling programs will reduce the number of trucks required to collect the remaining waste. A reduction of waste for standard collection leads to faster collection and fewer truck runs. RETHINKING ZONING ORDINANCES According to the California Department of Conservation, most local governments do not have provisions in their zoning ordinances for siting recycling facilities. As a result, those attempting to site recycling facilities may have to go through lengthy and forbidding permit procedures. Cities and counties should consider amending their zoning provisions where necessary to encourage reasonably sited recycling facilities. See, for instance, the model zoning ordinance prepared by the Department of Conservation Division of Recycling and distributed to cities through the League of California Cities in 1987. MANDATORY RECYCLING From time to time, many recycling advocates have considered the benefits of mandatory recycling ordinances. The City of Walnut appears to be the first among California cities requiring recycling. Three states, Rhode Island, New Jersey, and Florida, have adopted statewide mandatory recycling due to the critical nature of their solid waste problems. As solid waste problems become more severe in California, more areas will be forced to consider mandatory recycling. The mandate could take many different forms. It should be recognized, however,that mandating the collection of recyclables does not necessarily mean those materials will be recycled. Therefore, large scale"mandatory" recycling will require as a first step, • active expansion of recycling markets to be effective. MAKING THE MOST OF COUNTY SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLANS Although there are several legislative proposals to require the development of local Integrated Waste Management Plan, the power and glory of the County Solid Waste Management Plan (CoSWMP) is the requirement of conformity. Each new solid waste facility must be consistent with the requirements of the local CoSWMP. Current law requires that CoSWMPs be amended to call for a diversion of at least 20%of the waste stream from landfills. The opportunity provided by the CoSWMP amendment process is to make sure the new CoSWMP is specifically directed toward the achievement of the waste reduction goals. Although state law only requires the establishment of a 20% reduction goal, the CoSWMP should be amended to require the highest reasonably achievable reduction level. The California Resource Recovery Association advocates starting with a 25%goal and then increasing that goal to 50% after city and county waste reduction programs have been instituted,to the extent that markets are available. a j. /,{81�i� 5 F f_-. t,� `. 1 00• J•,�'� _,o a+ • s + 1 �•_ a• � 1� �,e'� • :��{ t•,,....�q.r.�;�**+-+ �,� t r Yf' '��,p°[ail y^�n.n„r,.t-S.:7 '� .`-� o�����,' • • C' = o j • _ � � .��.iy�8..� 'a i S k Y' `�'y-y j } i t ! i P+b • • t .� nta,/{ �,7 �.y 1 1 ¢'.,,i�,Y F '�l 'v''` • } �ir�����^���T��Tsn�!A�T������� 41�j.., �jik „'_” y ,� ! 77777 LJ�t yti 1!TM"'!'sgs'L • � • "'7"""'� � s s �� 7 `^!r!:d-""Mi ��i+leh�'+il4i '3i.. � y�fT! i <r, 7","�+-' • �I L' '*^"��i � ��a-r. i i i/ ���.P'i�k�,4 ;4M��ri:~�I�i`•T #i�, fi`` � ♦)_'- �S - + ,� t r ��.�4 �4ra• tj (l °��, .,,.,: o ..• 1 S. ' 7_ti t. X11 t �YP . (^toM- 1 - ,' fir! tll'� .'' '� �1 +�i+ t - �'i ' , •,. ^' "l "si r 7 l;i rr' v 7` t�r s�„'+,:�t�,�t�1� �.t. 'Cri f; i`,_7����.1.•1�f.".� Yt� s `� ��0.1. r> ra o rf I�7 1�:�1 >•(_.�j i i f!.f!'1.�'f` �S � �.a{i. �.:� lt.�,.#( Tr3�rr ,.J,��✓ a, ":� i� L� �t ira;l .`i 3�� �1 \r '1 a i _t_9 __ 'S, is i V. COST CONTROLS With over 15 years'experience with curbside recycling collection in the U.S., program operators have developed many techniques to reduce and control costs.This section first looking at key methods g summary of the y , provides a s y the revenue side of the balance sheet. tion of rec clab les is often chosen over Increasing Curbside collection y 9 Participation other methods because it produces a relatively high rate ofartici primarily rimarily due to convenience. Communi- ties P ties can improve participation (and thereby revenues) by enhancing convenience. One proven technique is to pro- vide all households with plastic storage containers. Participation Went Up After Storage Containers Were Provided Participation City Before After Champaign, IL 11% 83%(1) Kitchener, ON 65% 75% San Jose, CA 48% 75% Santa Rosa, CA 35% 70% Toronto, ON 42% 66% (1) Rate for one of five collection zones in the city. Average participation for all zones is 65 percent. Although containers boost capital costs by about $4 per household, in many cases the potential increase in pro- gram revenues can more than offset this expenditure. Enhancing Various strategies can boost program revenues. Smaller Revenues programs can work together to market glass containers, metals, newspaper and other collected materials. The combined volumes may attract more buyers, and prices and transportation options may improve. 18 • dot Ewa � O 91 ;�. Of A I S • �cr�e5� fGGc��iny 4Y40 rT . .� Lt wo �k5 — f t 't ��ccs c.,+� secs 8/ cub e �ccZ • o� Lit, , ��s .➢�,�+sa.resfd�yF{ ,fJs� (Y.Y••^ F..�.✓/,x BN.</�G-.Fe .pfi.�..f ��(r PHONE (805)466-1269 78 1% O / ��• � DIS 0P SflL CO. 111C. IfIR P. O. BOX 1199 ATASCADERO. CALIFORNIA 93422 is A C OF PAY ^7 . 5o PER HOUR NUMBER OF WORKERS 2 PER YEAR PAYROLL TAX RATE 10 .UO% OF L.APOR WORKERS COMPENSATION RATE 21 .713% OF LABOR MEDICAL & DENTAL RATE 6139 . 34 PER MONTH 'CRUCK INSURANCE -3300 . 00 PER MONTH FUEL & OIL RATE s5 .00 PER HOUR REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE $1 .00 PER HOUR MATERIAL HAULING $300 .00 PER LOAD LOADS TO MARKET 1 PER WEEP tJL:W TRUCK COST $36, 000 .00 PER TRUCK NEW BIN COST 56 . 00 PER BIN 'iE;'S t DENTIAL ARROYO GRANDE 1, 678 RESIDENTIAL GROVER CITY 2, 66'7 hESID(rNTIAL PISMO BEAC14 1, 484 • 141IMEER OF _BINS ===8- 34 .---- - - --- ------•---- ------ • ---- - • - - - LABOR $:cl, 2Ot.) PAYROLL TAXES 83, 120 WORKERS COMP INSURANCE $6,795 MEDICAL & DENTAL $3, 344 TRUCK INSURANCE $3, 500 FUEL & OIL COST $10, 400 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE $2, 080 MATERIALS HAULING 615, 600 ' TRUCK DEPRECIATION $3, 600 taS'fRAIGHT LINE 10 YEARS BIN DEPRECIATION 810, 601 @STRAIGHT LINE 5 YEARS ADVERTISING $5, 000 uFFICE & YARD OVERHEAD 510, 000 PER YEAR COSTS $105, 340 CUSTOMERS 8, 834 PER CUSTOMER/YEAR $11 . 92 MONTH S0 . 99 INCREASE PER (: Printed ars retyrled W! of v�ca 415/327-4977 �p �P GAIL C.WOOLLEY CITY OF PAIR ALT COUNCILMEMBER HIGH GRADE PAPER RECYCLIl • 1685 MARIPOSA AVENUE JANUARY 1989 PALO ALTO,CA 94306 Program Description Palo Alto's Office, White Paper Program is a City-sponsored service to encourage businesses to recycle white paper and computer paper. The service is directed primarily to businesses with a staff size of 200 people or less. Businesses serviced donate their paper to cover collection costs; larger businesses are encouraged to sell their paper directly to a buyer and to use the proceeds for a charitable donation, scholarship fund, or other employee recognition efforts. Pickup for all paper is free and is provided by the .Palo Alto Sanitation Company (PASCO) , who contracts with the City of Palo Alto for collection of all recyclables and garbage. Desk-side boxes and central collection bins, provided by the businesses, are recommended to implement the program. . Employees use the desk-side containers to place used, flat (uncrumpled) papers. When full, each person may empty the contents of his/her container in a centrally located bin. The City Fire Department requires metal, self-extinguishing bins (see attachment) . One bin is recommended for every 25-30 people, and an additional bin should be located next to each copy machine. Bins should not be placed next to elevators or in employee cafeterias to avoid disposal of material that is not white paper. To facilitate collection by PASCO staff, bins should be easily accessible and not placed behind locked doors. It is recommended that collection be on an on-call basis for the . first three months, until the volume warrants a regular , schedule. A minimum amount equal to a 30-gallon garbage can, or six ream-size cardboard boxes is requested_ before scheduling a pickup. Collections are made Mondays from 8:30 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. One person should be designated to be program coordinator. That person would call the Recycling Center, 329-2495, or PASCO, 493- 4894, by Friday, 4:00 p.m. , to request a pickup for the following Monday. Postern and sample information memos are provided by the City to publicize the program. A brief orientation session should be scheduled for office managers and custodial staff to address the program details and logistics. City staff is available to assist' in this effort. January 1989 Page 2. Program Sugport To ensure the program's viability, a company-wide memo from your management is strongly recommended, including the following information: 1. The reasons for implementation: potential reduction of waste collection and disposal fees, and conservation of precious landfill space, resources and energy. 2. The program is an official company effort to reduce waste and is supported by management. 3. The program is simple and will require little or no disruption of the 'daily office routine. 4 . The name(s) of the program coordinator(s) for your office who will be responsible for coordinating publicity for the staff, fielding questions from the staff, and for calling the recycling center to request collections. . The following additional information may be useful in composing your company-wide memo (sample memo attached) : 1. The United States Environmental Protection Agency has conducted surveys which show that an average office worker generates over one-half pound of high-grade (computer and white) paper every day, which is roughly equal to 40 percent of a business's waste stream. 2. For every ton of paper recycled, 17 trees will be saved. 3. In fiscal year 1987-88, Palo Alto's Recycling Program collected approximately 80 tons of computer and white paper, thereby saving over 1,350 trees. 4 . Some Palo Alto businesses which are regular recycling participants are: Fenwick, Davis and West, Attorneys-at- Law; Kodalux;Hare, Brewer and Kelley; and Hewlett-Packard. The program has been in operation for four years, and there are currently 80 accounts. If you have additional questions or need further assistance, please contact the recycling center at 329-2495. Attachment • TO: FROM: Janet Foreman Recycling Program 329-2495 SUBJECT: white Paper Recycling Program Welcome to the City of Palo Alto Shite Paper Recycling Program! By recycling high-grade paper (white and computer paper) , you will help to save trees (17 trees/ton) , save energy, reduce air and water pollution, and prolong the life of our landfill. This is how the Program works: : 1. Place the desk-side container you received near your desk. 2. Instead of discarding used white or computer paper, .place it in your desk-side container (please do not crumple the paper) . 3. When the desk-side container is full, empty ,,it into the larger, metal barrel in the hall or copy room, 4. When the barrel is full, or another designated staff member will call the Recycling Center or- PASCO by Friday at 4:OO-p:m. to schedule a pick-up- 4. on the following Monday, the full barrel(s) will be picked up at your office. If possible, keep computer paper separate from white ledger paper. The paper should be sorted 'as follows: ,,- - YES--Acceptable for Recycling 'NO--NOT Acceptable for/iRecycling white typing paper y 'letterhead ' newspaper - white writing paper paper bags;:: white photocopy paper magazines/catalogs; - white scratch paper colored paper: computer paper (store in envelopes separate bin, if available) ' paper towelsAleenex white index cards blue prints ; adding machine tape carbon paper/carbonless copies shredded white paper bad photocopies (totally ,black)-' paper with staples slick or glossy paper: paper with writing-on both sides tape, rubber bands, paper clips:: mailing .labels post-it notes; • . Thank you for supporting this programa • •,... tom_: bL)-3 .tea REtYC"'L1NG The City of Palo Alto commends.these businesses and employees who ,GIVE. AT'. THE OFFICE with the city . _ .� .. - � . • RAM WHITE PAPER RECYCLING. PROGRAM Employees3n these Palo Alto offices have saved and cycled•over 8o tons IN_the PalaAltoway of white p_ aper in FY 1987-88.By recyclinS office paper,they.have saved trees, conserved energy, reduced air and water poDution"and prolonged the life of our landfill. They have demonstrated their concern for the Palo Alto community and the envir- onment. We commend their efforts. _ -• . ._ Addison School, Aion Corporation.ll:nerican Social Health Associatim Animal Services, Annual Reviews, Beyond War, Bob's. Boy Scouts of America,CDG Communication% Coherent Thought. Conege Terrace Ubrary.Copy Mat — 2390 El Camino Real,Creative Initiative, l EgJP ent- pany. Duveneck DNAX. Downtown Ubrary. Drexel, Bumham. Lambert. Dura bond Bearing School,F_W.Communications,EDARRA,Failure Analysis,!:amil5+Service Association of the Mid- Peninsula, Fenwick, Davis and West, Foothill College, Garlastd School, Galfix,Gunn Figh School. Hamilton Copy Center.Hare,Brewer and Kelley.Hewlett Pa_kard —Porte:Drive Offices,Hoover Associates,Industrial Health.sero..InsuranceEquities,Jack biorton Accountancy,Jame L..Stanford Middle School. Keys School, Klnkos.' Knowledgedge•K*!"Lucia Stern Community Center. Main Ubrary, Metcalf&Eddy, MaaorJecb=dcs, Matched Park Ubsary,Munidipal Services Center Facilities and Equipment Management,Municipal Servif Center — Public Works/Operations, Municipal Services Center Utilities,New Venture Consultants,ohi ne School,Palo Alto Bicycle, Palo Aho Servs Center,Palo Alto Cultural Center.Palo Verde School.Parr Place Systems,Patrick Sullivan Associates. PAUSD Administration Bonding.Peninsula Chid: Center.Peninsula Con- Sullivan Center. QED Res�ch, R. W. Nielson Associates lne.. Reasoning Systems, Red Cross Rockwell International,SCADA,Schlumbega,Slonaker's Printing.Social Security Office — Cam- bridge Avenue, Steven's Printing. Technology Modeling Associates, Water Quality Control, Wells Fargo,Westminster House,Windham Hill,Zoecm Resolve to make 1989 the year to begin recycling at your offices For more Information on Palo Atto'e White Paper RecydW4 Program.ca 329-2495. C�siN Tv T � .t, q-- • A model for calculating the avoided costs of disposal. ..- As public officials examine important pol- beyond the requirements of the Opportu- icy questions on solid waste management nity to Recycle Act. Policy options in- bySteve Greenwoodoptions for the 1980s and 1990s, a key cluded recycling, material recovery, and factor will be cost. In comparing recycling the use of alternative technologies such Steve Greenwood is the manager of solid and other waste reduction options to the as composting and incineration. Once waste for the Oregon Department of En- traditional practice of landfilling, the cost again, the Oregon Legislature brought vironmental Quality. of these options will be important.Just as costs into the analysis by stating that important, and perhaps more difficult to waste reduction measures must be"eco- project, are the avoided costs of solid nomically feasible."One way to determine waste disposal. economic feasibility is to compare the costs of waste reduction to costs of land The problem of comparing costs disposal. The Oregon _ Department of Environ- The easiest, and most obvious, meas- men al duaiity (DEQ) has-developed an ure of disposal costs is to take the existing easy-to-use, microcomputer model of the tipping fee at the landfill. Indeed. this is true cost of solid waste landfilling, which.. how most of the disposal costs have beer. is useful in estimating the avoided costs estimated in performing the economic test of disposal when comparing landfilling to for recyclable materials under the Oregc various waste reduction options. The Opportunity to Recycle Act. Many recy model attempts to measure the true snria1 cling or+eritors and environr--­! 'ic1.= costs of landfilling, with the assumption nowever,are quick to point out that vppif a that historic tipping fees at the local landfill fees do not always reflect the true cost of may not provide an accurate or fair com- landfilling. What about the external costs parison to the costs of recycling. of environmental risk or damage that are The Oregon Opportunity to Recycle not accounted for in the tipping fee?Many Act,passedinrT983;prdv-iie ffiat all com- of our present landfills will soon be full. munities in Oregon with a population of What about the costs of the next landfill. more than 4,000 shall be provided with which will require a much higher level of curbside collection of recyclable mate- environmental control?Are we undervalu- rials. The list of recyclable materials is ing the cost of landfilling by not looking at based 'primarily on an economic test, the replacement cost of the landfill space which compares the cost of recycling (in- we're using up today? cluding the revenue received) to the avoided costs of collection and disposal. Developing the true cost model In the absence of the other data,the com- in 1986 the Oregon Department of En- parison is based on current tipping fees vironmental Quality hired ECO Northwest. at the present landfill,which do not reflect economic consultants,to develop a model the potential environmental risks posed for estimating the true social cost of land- by historical methods of landfilling,nor the filling solid waste. Working with ECO cost of the next landfill with increased en- Northwest were Brown and Caldwell con- vironmental protection features. suiting engineers,.who supplied technical More recently, the 1985 Oregon Legis- cost data. ECO Northwest developed a lature took action to formulate a com- microcomputer model of landfill costs prehensive solid waste program for the using Lotus 1-2-3 that required an IBM-PC Portland metropolitan area, which con- compatible computer with enough capac- tains half of the state's population. This ity to run Lotus 1-2-3. Other hardware re- program was to be based on an aggres- quirements include a compatible printerm sive waste reduction program that went The model is expressly designed to b z2 , Resource Recycling JanuaryiFe&uary i988 used by planning and engineering profes- E Table 1 — Baseline data sionals who are familiar with solid waste Entries management, and who have a basic un- Category (unit) derstanding of microcomputers and Lotus 1. Life of Landfill Month Year Yrs. Mos. 1-2-3. It is very easy to use, and does not 1.1 Today's Date 4 1986 na na require expertise in either computer pro- 1.2 Pre-Development Beginning Date 4 1986 3 0 gramming or microeconomics. 1.3 Construction Phase Beginning Date 4 1989 0 9 The model incorporates data that are 1.4 Fill Operations Beginning Date 1 1990 47 0 entered into a Lotus spreadsheet under 1.5 Closure Phase Beginning Date 1 2037 1 0 the following categories: 1,6 Post-Closure Care Beginning Date 1 2038 30 0 ■ Baseline data:characteristics about an 1.7 End-of-Care Date 1 2068 na na existing or proposed landfill site, such Total Project Life(yrs.,mos.) na na 81 9 as size, depth of fill, number of tons per year, etc. 2 Site Size Capacity ■ Pre-development costs:costs of siting, 2.1 Annual Waste (000 tons/year) 947 environmental impact studies. 11- ■ One-time capital costs: costs of initial 2.2 Depth ofFilltL' (feet)from edge of fila 2.3 Buffer (f 6 construction and related facilities such 2.4 Tons/Cubic Yard, Compacted 0.60 as roads,property acquisition,leachate treatment facilities, etc. 3 Data Derived From Above Entries: Derived Totals ■ Periodic capital costs: heavy equip- 3.1 Lifetime Capacity (000 tons) 44,540 ment purchases, and cell preparation 3.2 Operating Area (acres) 340 and closure. 3.3 Buffer Area (acres) 374 ■ Annual operation and maintenance 3.4 Total Site Area (acres) 714 costs:operating costs such as person- nel, daily cover, insurance, etc. ■ Closure costs: primarily legal costs, since the landfill is assumed to close Table 2 — One-time capital costs on a cell-by-cell basis. $/Unit #Units LS. Total S ■ Annual post-closure costs: calculated Category unit) for a 30-year post-closure period, 1. Land Cost 250 including monitoring and leachate 1.1 Off-Site ROW Land($/acre) 5,000 50 treatment costs. 1.2 Other Land($/acre) 2,000 43 2,086 2,086 ■ Other environmental costs: this op- 5,000 714 3.569 1.3 On-Site Land Cosi($/acre) tional category was included for poten- Subtotal(or enter lump sum) na 807 5,905 tial impacts to property values; how- ever, it was not used (see discussion below). ton figure for each category and for the L S..�ffigure number each' rp sum cost factor. ■ Transportation costs: an optional sec- total landfill. tion to calculate either direct haul costs Table 1 illustrates how the model works Finally, cost totals for each categthe ory or transport costs from transfer sta- and shows some of the baselineandfillfwi h end of the spreadsheet(see Table 3)rom and an overall cost are summarized tThe tions. the model's spreadsheet oa left-hand column provides the rota! In each category, a number of cost fac- an annual capacity of 650,000 tons. tors are listed. After entering the appro- Later in the sprsheet, uner one- amount(in thusans of doll see Table 2),the user right-hand column dprovidesaa)cost-pere- priate data,the model provides a total cost time capital costs for each factor, then for each category. enters data for the cost of land acquisi- ton. The lifetime capacity is also listed in Finally, the model summarizes the totals tions. Notice that the spreadsheet user thousands of tons. for each category and provides a cost-per- has the option of using a unit price(mul- The landfill cost model developed by Resource RecvcbruJ Jaf%;JT Februal ?951. ECO Northwest provides a structured for- E Table 3 — Cost totals and overall cost mat for entering data easily, which the model then uses to calculate total and per- Total Site Acreage 714 ton cost estimates. However, because of Real Discount Rate 3.0% DEO's belief that there may be costs to Lifetime Capacity (000 tons) 44,540 society not captured in a tipping fee, the model had to be more than a standard 1986 Dollars in the First accounting of costs directly than, Year of Operation by the landfill operator. In order to con- 1990 1990 struct this economist's view of the cost of Sm S-ton landfilling solid waste,a number of impor- Pre-Development Costs 4,010 .09 tant issues had to be accounted for. Capital Costs Inflation and costs over time Land 6,038 14 I In calculating the true cost to society, we 1-Time Construction Equipment 27,975 .63 first put all costs in terms of 1986 dollars. Periodic Equipment 8,492 .74 Periodic Cell Development 49,852 4.35 In order to do this, we first assumed that Periodic Cell Closure 4,488 .39 all goods and services would, over time, Total Capital Costs 96,844 6.24 experience a similar inflation rate. We tOperation&Maintenance Costs 73,146 6.38 herefore assumed away inflation in our Final Closure Costs 37 0 analysis and put everything in what economists call constant dollars. Post-Closure Costs 6.168 .14 I Other Environmental Impacts 0 0 Secondly, because people have a Transportation Costs 93.261 8.14 preference for consumption now rather Total Costs 273,465 20.99 than later, a real annual discount rate of 3 percent was used to devalue costs oc- curring in future years. This discounting of future costs is commonly used by economists and financial analysts to conduct a direct estimate of the value of It should be noted that this technique make costs (or benefits) that occur in dif- the damage. or potential damage. This can be used to evaluate the cost of exist- ferent years comparable.A 3 percent dis- method was not considered feasible be- ing landfill facilities as well as proposed count rate, for example, assumes that a cause of the tremendous effort involved, facilities. For example, an existing landfill person would just as soon have 97 cents and the potential for inaccuracy. may have limited design features for today as a dollar next year. While the 3 A better approach, and the one used in groundwater protection. To estim:!te ',,Ie percent discount rate is recommended, the model, is to calculate the costs of pre- environmental cost of that land"+. one this rite, ran be chanaed epsily C! nt.. r It is important to note that by assuming and leachate collection tha: away inflation, the model also does not lively prevent any groundwater c:'r�tami incorporate financing costs (i.e., interest) nation. but rather assumes the total cost of an An interesting conclusion drawn by item when it is experienced or purchased. ECO Northwest in the course of its re- Once again, this differs from the account- 66 Historic tipping in search was that the private (landfill ant's view of landfill costs. operator) costs are escalating, as more fees do not reflect and more environmental protection meas- Environmental damage ures are demanded by concerned citizens environmental risks or and regulatory agencies. Thus, in the fu- The true social costs of landfilling are as- 9 ry 9 sumed to be the sum of costs reflected in the increased costs of ture, "The private and social costs of a the tipping fee (internal costs, in the new landfill are likely to be equal.Require- economist's jargon) and the external the next landfill. " ments for environmental controls. buffer- costs of environmental damage or degra- ing, and public involvement in the siting dation not incorporated into the tipping process will cause what were previously fee.The question is,how do you calculate external environmental costs to be inter- the cost of environmental damage? Con- nalized in the costs of siting•constructing. siderable attention was given to this most operating. and closing a sanitary'ard`i!I critical issue in developing the true cost fect,the measures that will effectively re- (ECO Northwest, April 1986) model. Several alternatives were con- duce the risk of environmental damage to sidered. a negligible level (close to zero) must be Nuisance costs The principal environmental risks from determined. This approach has two ad- There are a number of less tangible en- landfilling include: a) groundwater con vantages. First, it is a figure that is much vironmental costs, nuisance costs. as- tamination from leachate, b) risk of easier to calculate accurately. Second, sociated with landfills,that affect the qual- methane gas migration to nearby struc- when comparing future policy options, it ity of life for nearby communities. These tures,and c)air quality problems from par- is more important to consider future ac- impacts include litter, noise, odor and ticulates and air emissions from the land- tions and expenses. rather than previous visual impacts of landfill. it is those en- fill. One way of calculating the costs is to experience. vironmental disamenities that prompt a 24 Resource Recydbn4 Jaruary.1Fe&uary 1988 A similar argument is often made with respect to the value of the land used to K dispose of garbage. "What about the fu- w R F ture value of that land?" many ask. The r' economists (and real estate profession- • -s ... � als) will tell us that the potential future value of land is a factor incorporated into today's market valuation of that land, mom: which is already incorporated into the cost model. Therefore, to calculate the future value of land resources separately would ±' � t be another example of double-counting. Limitations of the model The biggest problem in using the mooet z to compare the costs of landfilling to waste " reduction options is that the cost of those other options is often calculated with dif- ferent assumptions.For example,the cost - : - of financing and inflation is often included " in recycling or waste-to-energy analyses. One runs the risk of making apples-to- fees do not always reflect the true oranges comparisons which may unfavor- costs of landfilling,such as groundwater con- ably distort the analysis of waste reduction tamination, methane gas migration, and air options. A recent financial analysis of a quality problems. proposed landfill in Oregon included the costs of inflation and financing in the cost model, which resulted in cost figures that large portion of the public's resistance to ground.This is certainly true,although the were nearly 100 percent higher by the fifth the siting of landfills. loss is reduced by the cost required to year of analysis. If these disamenities carry an as- retrieve, separate, market and process A second limitation of the model is that cor`iated social cost, economists would these materials. it does require accurate estimates of costs • ury�c Gnat these costs should tie reflected When comparing the c �: _` :andfilling for each item, and therefore rec::ires re- view by persons knowledgeable in landfil'. in property values. particularly for nearby residential property. Substantial research design and operation costs. has been conducted on property value im- A third and related limitation is that en- pacts of landfills,with most of the research vironmental risks and other design re- indicating that impacts are generally neg- between geographic areas. There are al- of or non-existent beyond distances ways some unique features to each land- indicated that the size of a landfill influ- of 1,000 feet from the landfill. One study fill site. It is therefore important that,with- ences these impacts, and that large sites ■■ The computer model out detailed analysis, the general nature of the model is emphasized. may have an effect. offers a structured Last, we have found in Oregon that Once again, however,the method cho- when usingthis model to evaluate solid sen for measuring these nuisance costs format for entering data waste optins, the comparisons need to is measuring the costs design and and then calculates total be made over a comparable period. Or if operation measures that effectively elimi- that is not possible,the differences in facil- nate these impacts:a buffer area for visual and per-ton costs. ity_life should be accounted for in the com- and noise screening, daily cover of the parison. This is true primarily because of waste, litter patrols, gas collection sys- the reduced value of a dollar over time. tems, etc. In a well-buffered, well-de- sWithout accounting for these time differ- signed and well-operated landfill, these faces, the analysis will be distorted i formerly external costs (difficult though it formerly were to measure) are now inter- favor of the option which has been dis- counted over a longer period of time. nalized into the cost of new landfill The model developed by ECO North- facilities. Where facilities do not incor- porate these features, the cost model al- to waste reduction strategies, however, west and the Oregon Department of p- lows the user to calculate the costs as if including the loss of recyclable materials vironmental Quality represents d attempt they did. in the cost of landfilling means the value to include both private costs and externa! of these materials is counted twice.Their environmental costs associated with land- Loss of valuable materials value is already incorporated (as a posi- filling. With some limitations, this kind of Many recycling advocates believe that an tive benefit) into the cost of recycling. To model can be useful for policymakdeal ers • additional cost of landfilling is the loss of engage in this double-counting is to distort faced with difficult choices on how to with solid waste. RR materials(glass, metal, etc.) buried in the the analysis. ------ — - Resource Recyc::ng Januar; Fa!JVa!,; • Page 2 RECYCLING POLICY FOR THE CITY OF BACKGROUND The San Diego County Region is fast approaching a crisis situation in the area of landfill disposal capacity. As a result of a 40% increase in the per capita solid waste generation rate and continuing increases in population, San Diego County's landfill capacity is being exhausted at a much faster rate than was anticipated. Additionally, public resistance to the expansion of existing landfills, or to the siting of new landfills and resource recovery facilities, is adding to the difficulty in resolving the crisis. The need for landfills as part of the Region's solid waste system will continue for the foreseeable future. It is, therefore, necessary to optimize the use of our remaining disposal capacity, by reserving the capacity for the disposal of materials for which there are no viable disposal alternatives, and seeking new alternatives. The recycling of solid wastes through source separation and mechanical separation programs offers the potential- for diverting significant amounts of wastes from landfill disposal. Additionally, recycling programs can be • implemented in less time and at a lower capital cost than traditional solid waste management facilities. It is important, however, to recognize that recycling, by itself, cannot dispose of the Region's entire waste stream, and does not eliminate the need for other disposal technologies and programs. Recycling should play an increasingly important role in the Region's overall solid waste management strategy, since it can divert materials from landfill disposal, conserve energy and natural resources preserve open space and create employment opportunities. In developing a recycling policy it is important to consider the limitations on recycling caused by fluctuating markets, and changes in waste stream composition and in recycling technology. Therefore, it is essential that the Regions's recycling efforts balance materials recovery goals with cost effectiveness and the long term viability of recycling with the cost effectiveness and the long term viability of recycling within the Region's overall solid waste management strategy. PURPOSE Because of the many benefits which can be derived from an effective recycling program, it is important that a strong "recycling ethic" be developed and supported by the City Council, staff and the citizens of . The purpose of this policy is to express the City's commitmentto recycling as an integral part of the Region's comprehensive solid waste management strategy and to provide guidance in the development and implementation of a City-wide recycling program. 0 Page 3 POLICY To the extent that a significant portion of the solid wastes currently disposed of in San Diego County Region landfills are not truly "wastes, " but are actually recoverable resources, it is the policy of the City Council that the City shall actively support a comprehensive recycling program to optimize the recovery and reuse of these materials. The City's impact on the recycling of solid wastes varies with the degree of its involvement in recycling activities. The policy of the City in these areas is as follows: A. Recycling Goal It is the goal of the City that a comprehensive recycling program be developed and implemented for the purpose of recycling 30% of the solid wastes generated in the City of by in agreement with the standards established by the County of San Diego in the County Solid Waste Management Plan. B. Recycling Implementation Plan To achieve the 30% recycling goal,. an action plan shall be developed in the following areas: • 1. Public Education The degree of success in recycling programs, as measured by the level of participation and the amount of materials recycled, is directly proportional to the quantity and quality of recycling information disseminated to the public. It is the policy of the City to actively promote the dissemination of recycling information to the citizens of and to encourage the implementation of and participation in recycling programs. 2. Public Convenience It is the policy of the city that the convenience of the public in participation in recycling programs be taken into consideration in the design. of recycling programs. DRAFT • Page 4 3. Recycling Programs It is the policy of the City to encourage the initiation and development of recycling programs in cooperation with other governmental agencies and the private sector which include, but are not limited to: a. Residential source separation collection programs for single and multi-family dwellings b. Commercial/industrial recycling programs c. Composting d. Recycling Centers Materials within the waste stream that are to be targeted for recycling to the extent technically, economically and environmentally feasible shall include, but nor be limited to: a. All classes of paper b. Glass c. Ferrous and non-ferrous metals d. Plastics e. Household and commercial goods • f. Construction and demolition materials g. Plant debris and landscaping materials h. Inert materials such as pavement, rocks and tires To the extent economically and operationally feasible, the City will actively pursue the recycling of materials from its daily operations, particularly in the area of paper and automotive products. Additionally, the City will continue to support Christmas Tree Recycling Day and Clean-up Day as effective methods for reducing the amount of materials sent to the landfills. 4. City Purchasing Practices The City, where feasible, will examine its purchasing specifications and modify them to allow the use of, or to give equal consideration to, products produced from recycled materials and encourage purchasing items that can be reused and easily recycled , e.g. , purchasing paper and paper products made from recycled fiber. A few of the factors considered in purchasing of such products and materials will be: a. Cost b. Compatibility with existing equipment c. Timely delivery of product d. Ease and convenience of recycling and/or feasibility of recycling or reuse. DRAFT Page 5 5. Recycling Economics It is the policy of the City to consider recycling programs as alternatives to existing solid waste management and disposal programs in the region and, as such, recycling programs shall not be expected to operate solely on revenues generated from the sale of recovered materials. In evaluating the costs of recycling programs, consideration shall be given to the quantities of materials diverted from landfill disposal and the marginal costs of traditional collection and disposal methods. 6. Legislation It is the policy of the City to support State and Federal legislation that encourages recycling, removes barriers to recycling, provides funding for local recycling programs, or promotes waste reduction. At the same time, the City will oppose legislation which would reduce local control and autonomy in dealing effectively with the Region's responsibility for solid waste management. 7. Relationship to Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Program While recycling is an important element in San Diego County's waste management strategy, it is important to recognize that recycling will not eliminate the need for other environmentally safe and economically sound disposal technologies, facilities and programs in the comprehensive program for the management, and disposal of the Region's solid waste. B. Recycling Program Review Council will review the City's progress in the implementation of the recycling programs and the achievement of the recycling goals identified in this policy on an annual basis. J MODEL RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING WASTE REDUCTION GOALS AND ENDORSING A COMPREHENSIVE SOLID WASTE REDUCTION STRATEGY . • In the matter of establishing solid waste reduction goals and endorsing a Comprehensive Waste Reduction Strategy in the City/County of WHEREAS, the City/County of recognizes the importance of preserving limited and increasingly valuable landfill space, conserving natural resources, and protecting the environment;and - WHEREAS,. reducing, rousing, recycling and composting o-f.wastes can contribute significantly to achieving these environmental goats as part of a comprehensive integrated waste management system;and WHEREAS, AB1462 requires revisions of County Solid Waste Management Plans (CoSWMPs) to include a 209:recycling goal and a detailed plan of action for reaching this goal which will require aggressive recycling efforts by every city and county in the state;and WHEREAS, AB2020 has established an etwork of local recycling centers throughout the state that - have increased the convenience of recycling and provides an example of how recycling can be expanded at the local level; NOW, THEREFORE, BE .R RESOLVED THAT the City/County of " - hereby establishes the following goals and principles to govern local solid waste management activities t , Solid wastes should be managed as important recoverable resources that can contribute to the local economy when reused and recycled, r " x Z.- ',Landfills should tm managed not only to minimize environmental concerns but also , as a resource to be conserved; 3 ,-,The hierarchy of integrated waste management should be applied wherever 3 possible to foster solid waste options'in the following order of priorities: reduce 'consumption, reuse as much as possible,;recycle or compost materials from t wastes,recover energy values of wastes,then properly landfill the rest; 4 Wastes currently received at landfills should be reduced by at least 209'e through r recycling by 1994(or consistent with the CoSWMP,whichever is greater);and As local recycling collection programs•increase, the City/County shall work to stabilize and expand markets for recyclables by buying, recycled materials and i , ` products,expanding existing,and attracting new user industries to manufacture .� products from recycled materials,any, by supporting appropriate state and federal market legislation and programs t ' `• _ �; is '.;i i.:C;: ., w�.:{ A"i ;''i`'. _., �,. r>.:!:' ,..w` �1t 'L f 'q,j a' ny} r<;_ L •..1�,,J. ,�•• r� ,t k • ' FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Ciry/County of '" 'K "'`hereby wilt pursue the' following acclivities to implement the goals and principles adopted above (Choose one `��� j Or more ImmedIa*actions to take ,� j�,,1 R h `'x'4 �r�ti"��ryb. ``.rStirYP�„dva�}�t 1 7•- ,Y �ul�� '4�� .-. i ^t T �r�ky'y °�t tS�. �ctia � Y „S. g ;Perform a public opinion survey of residents and businesses orr recyclingti7'tr, 7 +,3 ...� ' K7 k v .•�,• - Perform a waste composition sfudr to identify recyclable,materials ��.•7!• '(y Yf. '� 3 , Establish aCof Recycling..Committee Ate 'Y v43`1N• y t1 �Commisslor>��� ,rt �i 'tc� �( ��, ., .:. r +'ay.,E. .Bd •q�rm'vt”' ,'xS ``€t taw+�a,� '�` _ ,, ,���� �� �, �• ��.;Adopt a mod@f zoning ordinarcs,ta faciNtate SIft of:recyding. rUes.~ x�, � � I�Gre a consultant.to conduct a feasibility study ot►devebp and Implementation Ptar Establrctt at. recycling coordtnatoc:posltlonv°ta: devefo _,,.' ds�impfement alp: r5 k � r', Z,.1 r' �"-�•^ �a JN r'i �, .�;;comprehensive waste reduction progrartr- t q:�,y� tx,kr W_" w 'lit xt, ` r.. 3•-7 ,�,t,�, }•h t Develop a Waste.Reduction:Strategy wet[ eafic irntiative,Ixidget,and t<ming Review collectiand disposal contracts„rate structure;soled waste facilely permits,�, R on "'sand ordrcrancres to identify changes needed to foster.recYcling,� r' - .* ;► �. ply S --...y a . S _limplemerrt a procurement policy favoring the purchase of products containing.. t .* t •�!f•: 1~i`-r i •d�.;+'';::. � _.f,rirms j. ti ar..' ra'ti'1'rr•r,"^hfti. qP;t-q 'y" ys ..iw�,E.'`y�P. .�}'7„7y�,�ft`.:,,e7�».rr, r ` rt. A^:ti'-'+>t'.EY'�bSleli" , t'•'i+M-c r�yTa.a•. .T'rec�ym.terfals • :•'d A..,Y '1'Mw t..}.,.r WRY, .. { k - tssua, Requests,for Proposals for Curbside: Recycling (or Composting or+ .. ,y-. .�,.,.V Mt + err+-:"t+•+r .z-ria •iy,s,,,a: .Y, . t '•t +ti S�s -: Commerr�aC Recyclino N7­ "Limi 1 Adopt CRRA's State Recycling t?oGcy as legislative policy,guidelines to guide staff In,suppOrUng recycling legarlatrortr m • ' .> a- , , w , ,�t �t � : j • 't r :i,,, iew u yt. v . r..lf :t +' r`1 .s, :. � 1 A'.%' is � ?W� t.' h 4 i-� > �A 8 �"t'i.k+. ►+��^' '�. �' ax u '*'r'R'ksiy `3 v�{-.' � a t+-e..M.'b..t .� x, r �! d �11.�R `•�.h�h7y'.i':... t 1 y. r t tl t y y r .:. ti � vac nye. t S � ,'` k.,yt�.- 's+�� 1 ,•"• ��'`.a R•�, � J.,,,,,,,�.�:.. - - �♦ s }. •.�.ui,.i�c�l r�'iwrk�,h_...,_ SA�� ..'n ; .w_ka `�.d�..'A.�s.> � � F .. . . ..F.r��+Ja :z er-:.T...,._• .. ORDINANCE NO. ORDINANCE AMENDING THE SANTA CRUZ COUNTY CODE BY ADDING SECTION 2.37.105, RELATING TO THE PURCHASE OF RECYCLED PAPER AND RECYCLED PAPER PRODUCTS The Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Cruz do ordain as follows: SECTION I Chapter 2.37 of the Santa Cruz County Code is hereby amended by adding Section 2.37.105 thereto, said new section to read as follows: 2.37.105 RECYCLED PAPER. A. The Purchasing Agent shall establish and maintain procedures and specifications for the purchase of paper and paper products which give preference, whenever feasible, to the purchase of recycled paper, and paper products containing recycled paper. B. The Purchasing Agent shall purchase recycled paper and paper products, instead of unrecycled paper or paper products, whenever such recycled paper and paper products are available at no more than _ the total cost of unrecycled paper and paper products, and when fitness and quality are equal . C. The Purchasing Agent shall provide a preference to the suppliers of recycled paper or paper products equal to five percent of the lowest bid or price quoted by suppliers offering unrecycled paper or paper products. D. For the purposes of this Section, "recycled paper" means all paper and wood pulp products as defined in Section 10391 of the Public Contract Code. SECTION II This ordinance shall take effe0t 30 days after final passage. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of , Santa Cruz, State of California, this day of 1986, by the following vote: AYES: SUPERVISORS NOES: SUPERVISORS ABSENT: SUPERVISORS R ON, airperson Board of Supervisors ATTEST: Clerk of the Board . 7 / • 86 The Sacramento Bee Final - Wednesday,March 22,1989 OPINION • The Sacmmento flee Locally owned and edited for 132 years JAMES McCLATCHY.editor. 1857-1883 C.K.MCCLATCHY.editor C.K.McCLATCHY,editor.president 1883.1936 GREGORY E.FAVRE.executimedifor WALTER P.JONES,editor. 1936.1974 PETER SCHRAG.edity l page editor ELEANOR McCLATCHY,president, 19361978 FRANK R.J.WHITTAKER.gerwa/mansger LETTERS FROM THE PEOPLE Reducing waste ;-Re"Who's going to take out the 'Clearly our priorities must be to garbage in California?.* Forum, reduce, reuse and recycle. If all Feb: 19: While Ed Salzman's por- citizens were charged for waste trayal of the urgency of the state's disposal based upon how much .solid waste crisis is accurate. he (hey..produce (per can for exam- seems to be operating on the ple), waste generation would be premise that Californians and dramatically reduced. When their political representatives are packaging manufacturers are unjustified for wanting a cleaner forced to pay for part of the cost and more environmentally sound of disposal before the consumer solid-waste management system. buys the product. manufacturers • ...Clearly, we are quickly ap- wilrbe concerned about the costs_ proaehing a solid-waste manage- of disposal that their products cre- ment crossroads. where we can ate. When manufacturers are re- establish priorities for the cost quired to use minimum levels of effective, environmentally sound waste materials in their products and publicly acceptable solutions (such as, newspaper, other paper .of recycling waste reduction and products. glass, plastic products) reasonable land-use planning or markets will be strong for waste we-can just accept the industry materials. and.the state deciding where land- A minimum mile-per-gallon rat- fills and incinerators should be to Ing on cars was one of the.tools sited. used to end the energy crisis.Un- Of course,there will be another like the energy crisis.the price of generation of landfills in the state, waste disposal will likely never go but the conclusions that the real down. Certainly. recycling will problem is our political leader's slow the rise in disposal prices. inability to make"LULU"(locally RODNEY A.MILLER, unacceptable land-use) decisions Legislative Director, for.landfills and incinerators is fa. Californians Against Waste. tally shortsighted.The new gener- Sacramento. ation of landfills and Incinerators will•be substantially more expan- sive,than existing landfills and in-. cinerators because they will be farther away from the urban core. i they will be designe4 to reduce thd,environmental impact and subsidies for incineration have been reduced. At the very least. oar-primary objective should be to make the next generation of landfills be our cast. The fact is • that these facilities are incompati- ble with populated communities. •MEETI (� AGENDA DATE�� �`i {TEM# M E M O R A N D U M DATEz- April 14, 19B9 - TO: Parks and Recreation Commission FROMs Andrew J. Takata, Director Parks, Recreation, and Zoo Department SUBJECT: ATASCADERO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT PROPOSAL_ SUMMER SWIM PROGRAM BACKGROUND: Dr. ' Anthony Avina, Atascadero Unified School District Superintendent, approached the City as to the possibility of the Parks, Recreation and Zoo Department conducting the Summer Swim a Program in Creston Elementary School and Atascadero High School. ANALYSIS: Swim programs conducted by municipalities on School District facilities are not uncommon. The programs are operated with normal recreation programming, except for times when the High School and club teams need access. The following is the 1988 St.immer Swim Program expenditure, not including utilities, maintenance, and chemicals. REVENUES .Swim l=ees sF 229006 .Creston Donation __3000 Total Revenues = $ 25,006 EXPENDITURES Salaries $ 17,500 Benefits 542 Total Salaries/Benefits = $ 18,042 Supp i i es Total Gross Expenditures = $ 19,885 Net Revenues■ • • . • v . v . ■ , vs • • ■ • • err • • • • • • r ■ • • • . . . . . . . .$5, 121 Since administrativeg Yutilitv and chemical costs are not included, it is difficult to determine if there is a possibility of a break-even point. It has not been neootiated with the School District as to who will incur the cost of utilities and chemical costs. OPTION ANALYSIS: Option I: Recommend to the City Council that they direct staff to begin operation of the District 's pool for the summer of 1989. Advantaoe: Parks, Recreation, and Zoo Department will be able to ' add an additional service to the community and program the facility to generate revenues. Disadvantage: There is a lack of preparation time to program a quality recreation program. There have been no formal negotiations with the District to determine liability, utility costs, etc. Option_.2; Recommend to the City Council that they direct staff to negotiate with the Atascadero School District to administer the operation of the District 's pools for the summer of 1990. Advantaqe: The Parks, Recreation, and Zoo Department will be able to provide an additional service to the community, and program the facility to generate revenues. It would allow ample preparation time to program a quality recreation program. It would allow ample time to complete negotiations with the School District. Disadvantage: Increased programminq could over burden present Recreation Division staff. C 0 tion 3: Recommend to the City Council that the City should not operate the School District 's pools. Advantaoe: It would not over burden present Recreation Division staff. Disadvanzage: There would be no City input as to programming of the facility. The School District would continue to operate a common recreation function. Staff feels that havinq the pool under the direction of the Parks, Recreation and Zoo Department could provide additional activities for residents. Staff does have concerns with performing this program for summer, 1989, for the following reasons: J . Adequate preparation time. a. Present internal changes have resulted in less man hours available at this time. 3. is not budgeted in the 1988/89 fiscal year. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Possibility of a net expenditure or net revenue. RECOMMENDATION: Therefore, it is recommended that the Parks and Recreation Commission recommend to the City Council that they direct staff to prepare for the operation of the Atascadero School District ' s Pool. Program for the .summer of 1990. ANDREW J.-TAKATA— _.._.__.---_- ----- Director AT:kv File: SchUst Attachments N Atascadero Unified School District "Where students and their education are paramount" 6800 LEWIS AVENUE ANTHONY AVINA,-Ed.D. ATASCADERO, CA 93422 District Superintendent PHONE: (805) 466-0393 April 3, 1989 Mr. Andy Takata Parks & Recreation City of Atascadero 6500 Palma Atascadero, CA 93422 Dear Mr. Takata: We are sending you herewith an accounting of the Summer Swim • Program for last summer along with a salary schedule for personnel for same. . Sincerely, A J . Ernest W. Taylor Chief Business Off-icial EWT: rr encl Carrisa Plains Elementary Creston Elementary Lewis Avenue Elementary Monterey Road Elementary Santa Margarita Elementary Santa Rosa Road Elementary • Atascadero Junior High School Atascadero Senior High School • Atascadero Adult School • Oak Hills Continuation High School j • i SUMMER SWIM PROGRAM SUMMER - 1988 Income:. Swim Fees $22, 006 Creston Donation 3, 000 $25, 006 Expense: Salaries $ 17, 500 Benefits 542 $ 18, 042 Supplies $ 1 , 843 $ 19, 885 ($ 19, 885) Net Profit $ 5, 121 Note: The above calculations do not include utilities . i ATASCADERO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 1987-88 SALARY INFORMATION NON-REGUALR EMPLOYEES Effective November 1, 1988 Substitute Teachers $55 per day short term $66 per day long term Adult Education Teachers $15.00 per hour Prep Period Substitutes $15.00 per hour Drivers Education/T'rainin9 $15.00 per hour SWAP $15.00 per hour Home Instruction $15.00 per hour PIC Grant $15.00 per hour ROP Teachers $15.00 per hour Nurse Consultant $15.00 per hour Aide for Visually Handicapped $6.04 per hour Si ning, Interpreter $8.40 per hour Swimming Pool Employees Pool Director $8.40 per hour Pool Life Guard $5.10 per hour WSI $4.40 per hour Pool Maintenace $4.20 per hour Swim Aide $3.10 per hour _ Yard Duty Supervisors $5.25- $5.50 - $5.75 per hour TMP• .sgw r ATASCADERO HIGH SCHOOL SLIMMER SWIM PROGRAM 1999 Recreational swimming will begin onSaturday, June 25 and run through Sunday, August 28. Pool hours will be scheduled as follows: Adult Lap Swim 7:00 am to 7:50 am Monday - Friday 12:10 prim to 1:00 pm Monday - Sunday Adult Exercise Grouo 12:10 pm to 1:00 pm Monday - Friday (Not available July 4 - 8) Recreational Swimming All ages welcome! Children 6 and under must be accompanied in the water by an adult. 1:00 pm - 4:00 pm Monday - Friday 1:00 pm - 5:00 pm Saturday and Sunday 7:00 pm: 9:00 pm Tuesday & Thursday (Evening swim through July 28 only) Daily swim fee per patron has been increased in some cases: Adult Lap Swim and Adult Exercise Group - 50 cents Recreational Swim - now $1.00 for all ages We offer American Red Cross swimming lessons for children four years and older. Classes available may include: Beginner; Advanced Beginner; Intermediate; Swimmer; Advanced Swimmer; Basic Rescue and Water Safety; Advanced Lifesaving. We also offer pre-swimming lessons for children four years of age and younger. Class offerings for pre-swimming lessons are Water Adaptive with Parent or Water Adaptive. All classes are limited to eight students and will be filled on a first come, first served basis. The summer swimming lesson sessions are as follows: Session I - June 27 through July 8 Session 11 - July 11 through July 22 Session III - July 25 through August 5 Session IV - August 8 through August 19 Session V - August 22 through August 26 i Lesson fees will be as follows: Sessions 1 through IV 20.00 per student per session 9 $ P Session V $10.00 per student Basic Rescue and Water Safety, Advanced Lifesaving $30.00 per student per session plus book fee. Registration for swim lessons will be in the High School gyre wrestling room (directional signs will be posted near the swimming pool) at-the following times: Sessions 1, II and V only - 5:30 pm - 8:30 pm Monday, June 13 Sessions III, IV and V only - 5:30 pm - 8:30 pm Tuesday, June 14th If you miss the scheduled registration times, please come to the pool Monday through Friday between 9:00 am and 11:30 am starting June 20. The High School Attendance Office telephone number, 466-1424 will be changed to the Pool Directors telephone number on June 20. You may call the Pool Director, Terri Kieselhorst, at that telephone number with your questions and comments between 9:00 am and 11:30 am. Do not call before June 20 as the Pool Director does not go on duty until then. The pool will be closed on July 4. ®®� 1EETIN AGENDA DATE = ITEM 0 ��� ®®� League of California Ci#i • 1400 K STREET • SACRAMENTO,CA 95814 • (916)444 — California Cities CITY MGR. Work Together Sacramento, CA April 5, 1989 T0: Mayors, City Managers, Clerks in Non-Manager Cities, Community Development and Planning Directors, Redevelopment Directors, Local Business Leaders and Other Interested Persons ANNOUNCING . . . . . 1989 DOWNTOWN REVITALIZATION CONFERENCE Wednesday - Thursday, June 28-29, 1989 Hyatt Regency, Sacramento 1209 L Street Sacramento, CA 95814 916-443-1234 The League is pleased to offer this special two-day conference on Downtown Revitalization, co-sponsored by the California Main Street Program of the State Department of Commerce, and presented in cooperation with the California Association for Local Economic Development and the California Downtown Association. • As California cities confront the challenge of keeping their central business districts productive and competitive in the face of ever-increasing competition from shopping centers and suburban development, many are turning to downtown revitalization as a way to retain the viability of their central business districts. Initiating and implementing a successful downtown revitalization strategy requires an effective organization and a thorough understanding of the techniques. This Conference covers a variety of techniques for revitalizing your downtown, whether you're just getting started, or already have a program in place. While the focus is primarily on small- and medium-sized cities, larger cities will certainly gain valuable information for both downtown and neighborhood revitalization strategies. The conference will explore how cities and the business communities can work together, building on the strengths of each. We encourage each city to send at least one representative and to invite representatives from your Chamber of Commerce or Downtown Business Association to attend with you. Don't miss this valuable educational experience. The ideas you gain can return many times the small investment you will make to attend. SPOUSES. No spouse program is planned; however, spouses are most welcome to attend any of the sessions, receptions and meal functions. Tickets for meals and receptions for spouses or guests can be purchased at the League Registration Desk, on a space-available basis. .Information on local attractions will also be available. Please note the following deadlines: • Hotel Reservations: Tuesday, June 6, 1989 Advance Conference Registration: friday, June 16, 1989 dtrannc.train REGISTRATION. You are encloraged to register in advance us* the registration form attached. Complete the Advance Registration Form and return it with a check or money order (please no purchase orders) in the appropriate amount to the LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES, CONFERENCE REGISTRATION OFFICE, P.O. BOX 7005, LAFAYETTE, CA 94549, (415-283-2113) . TO PROCESS THE REGISTRATION, PAYMENT OF THE REGISTRATION FEE MUST • ACCOMPANY THIS FORM. At the bottom of the Registration Form is a questionnaire for those who plan to attend the meeting but do not wish to register in advance. If you expect to attend, please fill out either the ADVANCE REGISTRATION SECTION (return with payment) or the ATTENDANCE QUESTIONNAIRE SECTION, and return the entire form to the League's Conference Registration Office by Friday, June 16, 1989. On-site registration facilities for those not registering in advance will open Wednesday, June 28, at 8:00 a.m. REGISTRATION FEE. The fee structure for League conferences provides for a reduced fee for advance registration. To take advantage of the reduced fees, the registration must be postmarked not later than Friday, June 16, 1989. After that date the full fee will apply. If your registration is not sent by June 16, please register on site. The registration fee for this conference includes 3 programmed meal functions, a reception, breaks and program materials. REGISTRATION FEE ADVANCE BEFORE JUNE 16 FULL FEE PUBLIC OFFICIALS $125 $150 NON-PUBLIC OFFICIALS $140 $165 REGISTRATION FEE REFUND POLICY. Advance registrants unable to attend this meeting will receive a refund of the full registration fee, less a $35 processing charge, by submitting a written request to the LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES, CONFERENCE REGISTRATION OFFICE, BOX • 7005, LAFAYETTE, CA 94549. REQUEST FOR REFUNDS MUST BE RECEIVED BY MONDAY, JULY, 31, 1989. HOTEL RESERVATIONS. The Hyatt Regency Sacramento will hold a block of sleeping rooms for this meeting until Tuesday, June 6, 1989. After that date, reservations will be on a space-available basis. When making your hotel reservations, please use the attached HOTEL RESERVATION FORM which includes the sleeping room rates of $88 single or $98 twin/double-bedded room; plus 10% city hotel tax. Non-smoking rooms are available upon request. If you are planning to share a room, only one form with both names is necessary. Reservations must be received by Tuesday, June 6, 1989, in order to be sure that your room request is filled. A deposit in the amount of the first night's guest room rental is required to confirm individual reservations or guarantee with major credit card (American Express, Mastercard, Visa, Diners Club, Carte Blanche). Deposits are refundable if your reservation is canceled 48 hours before arrival ; be sure to record your cancellation number. Check-in time is 3:00 pm; check-out 12 noon -- luggage can be stored at Bell Desk. Hotel reservation forms should be returned directly to: Reservations Department, Hyatt Regency, 1209 L Street, Sacramento, CA 95814 LOCATION. By Auto: From Interstate 5 exit "J" Street; take "J" Street to 14th Street; turn right to "L" Street; turn right to Hotel entrance on right side of "L" Street between 14th and 12th Streets. From Business Interstate 80 take Interstate 5 North then follow above directions. From the South on Highway 99 take Business I 80 West; exit at 16th Street to "L" Street; turn left. Hotel entrance on right side of "L" Street. TRANSPORTATION. Travel information (air and auto rental), reservations and ticket service is available through Mutual Benefit Travel Association, the League's travel consultant in Sacramento, at 916-929-4488 or 800-223-6282. Discount air fares are available on America* Airlines (Star Number S75795) and USAir (Convention Fare AC440Z) for League meetings. Contact MBTA for ticketing arrangements. Discount fares are subject to availability; be sure ,to make your reservations early. -2- *DOWNTOWN REVITALIZATION CONFERENCE Wednesday —Thursday, June 28-29, 1989 Hyatt Regency, Sacramento 1209 L Street, Sacramento, CA 95814 916-443-1234 • PRELIMINARY PROGRAM Wednesday, June 28 8:00 am REGISTRATION OPEN 9:00 am OPENING GENERAL SESSION The City's Role in Revitalizing Downtown (or, How Not to Kill Your . Downtown) How to generate investor confidence in downtown; including zoning, land use and development policies and incentives, leveraging private investment, effective use of the public hearing process, providing political support. 10:15 am BREAK 10:30 am CONCURRENT SESSIONS I. Getting Started: Downtown Revitalization Basics An overview of revitalization basics, including gaining community support for downtown, pitfalls to avoid in starting up a downtown program, planning, staffing, funding and implementation for long-term success. 11. Parking Management and Design for Downtowns A discussion of parking management strategies and design alternatives to improve parking and traffic access in the downtown area. • 12:00 noon GENERAL LUNCH Financing Downtown Revitalization A discussion of the options and methods available to fund downtown programs and improvements, including Business Improvement Districts (BIDs), public funding, and private fundraising. 2:00 - 3:15 pm CONCURRENT SESSIONS I. Revitalizing Downtowns for Small Cities and Small Budgets Practical tips on revitalizing your downtown with limited funds and staff resources. II. Boosting Downtown's Vitality with Special Events and Promotions A look at how special events and promotions can be incorporated into your revitalization program, draw in new customers, and enhance the economic vitality of your city's downtown. 3:13 pm BREAK 3:30 4:45 pm CRACKERBARREL SESSIONS An opportunity for informal discussion and idea sharing. Come prepared to raise questions, suggest solutions and learn from others. I. Funding Strategies for Revitalization Programs II. The City's Role in Organizing Nerchants III. How to Get Started in Revitalization IV. Improving Downtown's Image with Promotions and Special Events • V: Selling Revitalization: Communication with the Press and Citizens VI. Planning for Tourism in Your Downtown 5:30 - 6:30 pm GET-ACQUAINTED RECEPTION (HOSTED) Evening Free 0 Thursday, June 29 7:30 am REGISTRATION OPEN • 7:30 - 8:45 am CONTINENTAL BREAKFAST DISCUSSION SESSIONS I. Special Issues for Downtown Revitalization Small Cities (for cities under 15,000) II. Design Issues III. Business Assistance Programs that Mork IV. Improving Downtown's Image with Promotions and Special Events V. Selling Revitalization: Communicating with the. Press and Citizens VI. Planning for Tourism in Your Downtown 9:00 - 10:15 am CONCURRENT SESSIONS I. Developing Design Guidelines for Your Downtown A step by step description of how a community can develop a set of design guidelines for downtown commercial building (new and old) that are easy to use, well-received by the community, and reflect the architectural and other design features that make the downtown special. II. Attracting and Retaining Business - Part I Market research that works. How to gather and use data to recruit business to your downtown. I11. Using Downtown Revitalization Techniques for Urban Neighborhoods • Case Study: How the public and private sectors of a large city can cooperate to develop strategies and program that reverse decline in older commercial neighborhoods. 10:15 - 10:30 an BREAK 10:30 - 11:45 aer CONCURRENT SESSIONS 1. Implementing Design Guidelines How to work with property owners to implement design guidelines and: seismic safety requirements; and how to work with merchants to develop effective and attractive storefront displays. II. Attracting and Retaining Business - Part 2 Strategies for successfully attracting new business, and for supporting the existing merchants. 1Ih. Land Use Policy and Downtown Revitalization A discussion of the relationship between your downtown revitalization efforts and local land use, development, zoning and redevelopment plans and policies. 12:00 noon CONCLUDING LUNCH The Nunn Element: Techniques for Morking with diverse Groups and Interests to Achieve Consensus. dtrannc.train • LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES • 1989 DOWNTOWN REVITALIZATION CONFERENCE Wednesday - Thursday, June 28-29, 1989 Hyatt Regency, Sacramento HOTEL RESERVATION FORM NAME: ADDRESS: CITY: STATE: ZIP: PHONE: ) ARRIVAL DATE: am/pm DEPARTURE DATE: am/pm (Check-in time is 3:00 pm; check-out time is 12 noon) ACCOMMODATIONS REQUESTED: SINGLE ROOM (1 PERSON) AT $88.00 PER DAY (plus 10% city tax) DOUBLE ROOM (2 PERSONS) AT $98.00 PER DAY (plus i o city tax) TWIN ROOM (2 PERSONS/2 BEDS) AT $98.00 PER DAY (plus 10% city tax) I WILL BE SHARING THE ROOM WITH: Reservations must be received by Tuesday, June 6, 1989 in order to be sure that your room request is filled. Reservationsreceivedafter that date will be on a space available basis. Guarantee your reservation by credit card or a deposit for the first night's room rate. Deposits are refundable if your reservation is canceled at least 48 hours prior to arrival . PLEASE GUARANTEE MY ROOM RESERVATION Deposit Enclosed Amount Enclosed $ Credit Card # Type: (circle) AMX, MC, VESA, CB, DC Exp. Date RETURN THIS FORM BY JUNE 6, 1989 TO: Hyatt Regency, Sacramento 1209 L Street Sacramento, CA 95814 916-443-1234 ATTN: Reservations dtrannc.train LIVE FILE Convert ( Access I Stare a THIS SHEET INDICATES THIS SECTION CONTAINS POOR QUALITY IMAGES CITY:. LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES • 1989 DOWNTOWN REVITALIZATION CONFERENCE Wednesday Thursday, June 28.29,. 1989 Hyatt Regency, Sacramento ADVANCE CONFERENCE REGISTRATION (to reserve: sleeping rooms, use the Hotel Reservation Form) Enter first and last name and official title as they should appear on the conference badge and registration card. Please indicate your spouse's name if he/she will attend. (No charge for spouse registration. Spouses` meal/reception tickets may be purchased on-site upon arrival .) , NAME TITLE SPOUSE'S NAME Number of registration fees.: A Avanced Registration n � � After June 16,; please register on site Postmarked before Friday, June .161989-- r' The Full Fee will apply after June 16 Public officials s't s I25 _ @S 150 Non-Public Officials @.J 140; .= @ 165 S TQTAt, � TOTAL S • Make checks payab eh to quell;',of Cal,ifornl it es Method of Payment. . Gita:Ghetk. Personal Ghees = prtease; ''no purchase orders), NOTE- PAYMEN' MUST ACCOMPANY THIS 'FORIt`TQ PRESS IE ItDYA1 E REGISTRATION . Send registration receipts tcx. address indicated belowgg,I # _ asem, A-14"B � 'r` Name. � ' ltl QA _ - . Zi Address: p; Phone. +, DEADLINE. Advance regfstrator forms muste maf on or beforeFriday, June 16, 1989. If:your reg stratltir i��t � lease re b that date, pgister on site. 'sus fit: s`+ w"' � ♦'�� yi"4°t,.'�.! � d.',sf°�$°Y` f r'. "• _ RE6I5TRATION FEE Rfk"UI POLL `lrance std ctend' this meeting will receive;a.rafund o theuQlTtstratfa .fe S.processing charge, by submitting a:wrii:i"en request.ta,they ,.Q6 GALTEORKK CITIES�4CONFERENCE REGISTRATION OFFICE, BOX LAFAYETTE,;,G 954 s IJES►Ttti RE�_lR1ST NE RECEIYEQ BY IiOItY,� JULY 31, 1989. :ATTENDANCE" QtIESTI0t�g1AIR . aft Sem fats to this meeting, but we 'do not - tffii� 4ish to rerQister ire aclva�nce , PLEASE RETURN BIT' Eeague o Cad 'forr�fia Citi es l�. �: �X, 00 ° FRIDAY, JUNE 161 1988 �.taafayette CA 9+ 549 415-283-2111 � �� �., � s ��y� , +°,� Mpw +ut"3y,,'{ :.. ted E �� .-� � � #+ s ak k' k Fri ,S t t h` ,t^ x f�.. ,d. s*k X t#a,y„ ;•m�5' " r,,,,, s yx