HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 03/11/2003 19i$ 197-9CITY OF A TASCADERO
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
TUESDAY, March 11, 2003
7:00 P.M.
City of Atascadero
6500 Palma Avenue, 4t" Floor
Atascadero, California
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: 6:30 P.M.
•
COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION:
(Immediately following Redevelopment Agency Meeting and Closed
Session)
1. PUBLIC COMMENT - CLOSED SESSION
2. Call to Order
a) Conference with legal counsel- Existing litigation (Govt. Code
Sec. 54956.9 (a))
1. Environmental Center of SLO v. City of Atascadero
2. Creekside Associates v. City of Atascadero
3. Adjourn
4. CLOSED SESSION REPORT
REGULAR SESSION: 7:00 P.M.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Pro Tem Luna
ROLL CALL. Mayor Clay
Mayor Pro Tem Luna
Council Member Scalise
Council Member O'Malley
Council Member Pacas
INTRODUCTIONS:
COMMUNITY FORUM: (This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wanting to address the
Council on any matter not on this agenda and over which the Council has jurisdiction. Speakers are
limited to five minutes. Please state your name and address for the record before making your
presentation. The Council may take action to direct the staff to place a matter of business on a future
agenda. A maximum of 30 minutes will be allowed for Community Forum, unless changed by the
Council.)
APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Roll Call
PRESENTATIONS:
1. Recognition of outgoing Planning Commissioner, Jonelle Norton
2. Proclamation declaring March 20, 2003"Absolutely Incredible Kid Day"
3. Proclamation declaring March 2003 "Red Cross Month"
COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS: (On their own initiative, Council Members
may make a brief announcement or a brief report on their own activities. Council Members may ask a
question for clarification, make a referral to staff or take action to have staff place a matter of business on
a future agenda. The Council may take action ora items listed on the Agenda.)
A. CONSENT CALENDAR: (All items on the consent calendar are considered to be routine
and non-controversial by City staff and will be approved by one motion if no member of the
Council or public wishes to comment or ask questions. If comment or discussion is desired by
anyone, the item will be removed from the consent calendar and will be considered in the listed
sequence with an opportunity for any member of the public to address the Council concerning the
item before action is taken.)
1. CitV Council Minutes — February 25, 2003
■ City Clerk recommendation: City Council approve the City Council minutes of
February 25, 2003. [City Clerk]
•
2
2. 2002 Audit Report
■ Fiscal impact: None.
■ Staff recommendation: Council review and accept the audit report for the fiscal year
ended June 30, 2002. [Administrative Services]
3. Commission Appointments
■ Fiscal impact: None identified.
■ Staff recommendation: Council:
1. Adopt, on second reading by title only, the draft Ordinance amending the
Atascadero Municipal Code relating to the appointment of members of the
Planning and the Parks and Recreation Commissions; and,
2. Adopt the draft Resolution outlining procedures for implementation of the
Ordinance concerning appointment of members of the Planning and the Parks
and Recreation Commissions. [City Manager]
4. Residential Second Unit Code Text Amendment-Zone Change 2003-
0039
■ Fiscal impact: None.
■ Staff recommendation: City Council adopt on second reading, by title only, the draft
Ordinance, amending the Zoning Ordinance to allow second units in the RSF-Y
Zoning district subject to performance standards. [Community Development]
5. Facility Use Agreement with Atascadero Girls Softball
■ Fiscal impact: Minor savings to the City resulting from maintenance responsibilities
performed by Atascadero Girls Softball.
Staff recommendation` Council authorize the City Manager to execute a Facility Use
Agreement between the City of Atascadero and Atascadero Girls Softball.
[Community Services]
6. Final Map-Atascadero Ave. (Gearhart)
■ Fiscal impact: None.
■ Staff recommendations: Council:
1. Accept Final Parcel Map 2001-0006(Tract 2415); and,
2. Authorize City Manager to execute Subdivision Improvement Agreement. [Public
Works]
B. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. Zone Change 2000-0008, Master Plan of Development (CUP 2000-
0024) — Vesting Tentative Tract Map 2001-0011, 6340 Alcantara Ave.
(Russell/Sholders)
■ Fiscal impact: The project would likely have a slight negative impact on City
revenues. As a general rule, single-family dwellings require services that exceed the
revenue generated by the dwelling.
■ Planning Commission recommendation:
1. Adopt Resolution A, to certify the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration 2002-
0049; and,
2. Introduce for first reading, by title only, Ordinance A approving Zone Change
2000-0008; and,
3. Adopt Resolution B, approving Conditional Use Permit 2000-0024 for the Master
Plan of Development subject to findings and conditions of approval, amending
the affordable housing condition# 15 to a seven-year deed restriction; and,
4. Adopt Resolution C, approving Vesting Tentative Tract Map 2001-0011, subject
to findings and conditions of approval.jCommunity Development]
3
2. Cost Allocation Plan and Fee Study
• Fiscal impact: Potential increased revenue to fund capital replacement and essential
City services. Actual revenue increases are dependent on fees adopted.
■ Staff recommendation: Council accept public comment and provide direction to staff
to return the item for the next Council agenda with an implementing ordinance for
consideration of adoption. [City Manager]
C. COMMITTEE & LIAISON REPORTS: (The following represent standing committees.
Informative status reports will be given,as felt necessary.):
Mayor Clay
1. Water Committees
2. County Mayor's Round Table
Mayor Pro Tem Luna
1. Finance Committee
2. Integrated Waste Management Authority(IWMA)
Council Member Scalise
1. Atascadero State Hospital Advisory Board
2. Local Agency Formation Commissions(LAFCO)
3. S.L.O. Council of Governments (SLOCOG)/S.L.O. Regional Transit Authority(SLORTA)
Council Member O'Malley
1. Finance Committee •
2. City/Schools Committee
3. Air Pollution Control District(APCD)
4. Economic Vitality Corporation, Board of Directors(EVC)
Council Member Pacas
1. City/Schools Committee
2. Atascadero Youth Task Force
D. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION:
1. City Council
2. City Clerk
3. City Treasurer
4. City Attorney
5. City Manager
4
• E. ADJOURNMENT:
Please note: Should anyone challenge any proposed development entitlement listed on this Agenda in court, that
person may be limited to raising those issues addressed at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written
correspondence delivered to the City Council at or prior to this public hearing. Correspondence submitted at this
public hearing will be distributed to the Council and available for review in the City Clerk's office.
I, Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk of the City of Atascadero, declare under the penalty of
perjury that the foregoing agenda for the March 11, 2003 Regular Session of the Atascadero
City Council was posted on March 4, 2003 at Atascadero City Hall, 6500 Palma Ave.,
Atascadero, CA 93422 and was available for public review in the Customer Service Center at
that location.
Signed this 4"' day of March 2003 at Atascadero, California.
M G(�
Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Cler
City of Atascadero
•
5
City of Atascadero
WELCOME TO THE ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
The City Council meets in regular session on the second and fourth Tuesday of each month at 7:00 p.m., in the •
Council Chamber of City Hall. Matters are considered by the Council in the order of the printed Agenda.
Copies of the staff reports or other documentation relating to each item of business referred to on the Agenda
are on file in the office of the City Clerk (Room 311) and are available for public inspection during City Hall
business hours at the Central Receptionist counter and on our website, www.atascadero.ora. An agenda packet
is also available for public review at the Atascadero Library, 6850 Morro Road. Contracts, Resolutions and
Ordinances will be allocated a number once they are approved by the City Council. The minutes of this
meeting will reflect these numbers. All documents submitted by the public during Council meetings that are
either read into the record or referred to in their statement will be noted in the minutes and available for review
in the City Clerk's office.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in a
City meeting or other services offered by this City, please contact the City Manager's Office, (805) 461-
5010, or the City Clerk's Office, (805) 461-5074. Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time
when services are needed will assist the City staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to
provide accessibility to the meeting or service.
TO SPEAK ON AGENDA ITEMS
Members of the audience may speak on any item on the agenda. The Mayor will identify the subject, staff will
give their report, and the Council will ask questions of staff. The Mayor will announce when the public
comment period is open and will request anyone interested to address the Council regarding the matter being
considered to step up to the podium. If you wish to speak for, against or comment in any way:
• You must approach the podium and be recognized by the Mayor •
• Give your name and address(not required)
• Make your statement
• All comments should be made to the Mayor and Council
• All comments limited to 5 minutes(unless changed by the Council)
• No one may speak for a second time until everyone wishing to speak has had an opportunity to do
so,and no one may speak more than twice on any item.
The Mayor will announce when the public comment period is closed, and thereafter, no further public
comments will be heard by the Council.
TO SPEAK ON SUBJECTS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA
Under Agenda item, "COMMUNITY FORUM", the Mayor will call for anyone from the audience having
business with the Council to:
• Please approach the podium and be recognized
• Give your name and address(not required)
• State the nature of your business
This is the time items not on the Agenda may be brought to the Council's attention. A maximum of 30 minutes
will be allowed for Community Forum(unless changed by the Council).
TO HAVE ITEMS PLACED ON AGENDA
All business matters to appear on the Agenda must be in the Office of the City Manager 14 days preceding the •
Council meeting. Should you have a matter you wish to bring before the Council,please mail or bring a written
communication to the City Manager's office in City Hall prior to the deadline.
"ABSOL UTEL Y INCREDIBLE KID DA Y"
MARCH 20, 2003
WHEREAS, March 20, 2003, has been declared by Camp Fire USA, a national
youth development organization, Absolutely Incredible Kid Day@, and
WHEREAS, Camp Fire USA commemorates its Seventh annual Absolutely
Incredible Kid Day® on this date; and
WHEREAS, as part of the celebration of children on this day, adults are
encouraged to send letters of love and appreciation to young people in their lives;
and
WHEREAS, that as the Camp Fire USA mission pledges a firm commitment to
building caring, confident youth and future leaders, an extension of that
commitment is handed to caring adults through this event to express their feelings
in a letter or note which has the profound ability to make a lasting and positive
impact on the children in our country;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED by the City Council of the City of
Atascadero our support for Camp Fire USA's
Absolutely Incredible Kid Day@
And, therefore, urge all adults — moms and dads, grandparents, aunts and uncles,
teachers, mentors and other adults alike— to participate in Absolute Incredible
Kid Day® and make a difference in the life of a child. Camp Fire USA encourages
all adults to compose a letter on this Absolute Incredible Kid Day® and deliver
them to the children of the City of Atascadero, California on March 20, 2003.
WITNESS THE OFFICIAL SEAL OF
THE CITY OF ATASCADERO
• Jerry L. Clay, Sr., Mayor
City of Atascadero
March 11, 2003
ct tt�l
"RED CROSS MONTH"
MARCH 2003
WHEREAS, The American Red Cross is a humanitarian organization led by
volunteers with a mission to provide relief to victims of disaster and to help people
prevent, prepare for, and respond to emergencies; and
WHEREAS, today, in a collaborative effort with the federal government and
members of the emergency planning community, the San Luis Obispo County Red
Cross and its partners launched a bold new initiative, Together We Prepare. Aimed at
empowering individuals and families to protect themselves, the San Luis Obispo County
Red Cross encourages residents to help make their homes and community safer by
making a plan, building a kit, getting trained, and volunteering.
WHEREAS, the San Luis Obispo County Red Cross has served the community
since 1917, providing disaster relief to victims of wildfires, floods, and hazardous
materials incidents, providing disaster preparedness education, emergency services
and communication to the military and their families; providing CPR and First Aid
training; and providing volunteer opportunities and youth involvement to the.citizens of
• this County; and
WHEREAS, American Red Cross volunteers stand poised to respond to kr,al,
national, and international emergencies should the need arise. Those who are victims
of disaster, are military personnel or family members, or those looking to prepare for the
unexpected, rely on the San Luis Obispo County American Red Cross. Compassionate
and caring people, who want to make a difference in San Luis Obispo County and
across the nation, channel their support through the American Red Cross.
NOW, THEREFORE, 1, the Mayor, on behalf of the Atascadero City Council do
hereby proclaim March 2003 as American Red Cross Month. As we celebrate
American Red Cross Month, l call upon all our citizens of Atascadero to become
partners in preparedness with their local Red Cross chapter and to become active
participants in advancing the noble mission of the°Red Cross.
WITNESS THE OFFICIAL SEAL OF
THE CITY OF ATASCADERO
Jerry L. Clay, Sr., Mayor
City of Atascadero
March 11, 2003
ITEM NUMBER: A-1
DATE: 03/11/2003
isi$ ■ 1-97-9
CITY OF A TASCAD
ERO
CITY COUNCIL
DRAFT MINUTES
TUESDAY, February 25, 2003
7:00 P.M.
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: 6:30 P.M.
COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION:
1. PUBLIC COMMENT - CLOSED SESSION
• 2. Call to Order -
a) Conference with legal counsel - Existing litigation (Govt. Code
Sec. 54956.9 (a))
1. Environmental Center of SLO v. City of Atascadero
3. Adjourn
4. CLOSED SESSION REPORT
City Attorney Roy Hanley announced there was no reportable action
taken.
REGULAR SESSION: 7:00 P.M.
Mayor Clay called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. and led the Pledge of Allegiance.
•
CC 02/25/03
Page 1 U V
ITEM NUMBER: A-1
DATE: 03/11/2003
ROLL CALL:
Present: Council Members Scalise O'Malley, Pacas Luna and Mayor Clay •
Absent: None
Others Present: City Clerk Marcia McClure Torgerson
Staff Present: City Manager Wade McKinney, Assistant City Manager Brady
Cherry, Community Development Director Warren Frace,
Information Technology Director Andrew Fruin, Public Works
Technician Valerie Humphrey, Police Chief Dennis Hegwood, Fire
Chief Kurt Stone and City Attorney Roy Hanley.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA:
MOTION: By Council Member Scalise and seconded by Mayor Clay to
approve an amended agenda with Item #A-4 pulled for
consideration at the next City Council meeting.
Motion failed 2:3 by a roll-call vote. (O'Malley, Pacas and Luna
opposed)
MOTION: . By Mayor Pro Tem Luna and seconded by Council Member •
Pacas to approve the agenda.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote.
PRESENTATIONS:
1. Recognition of outgoing California Transportation Advisory Committee (CTAC)
representative, Dennis Schmidt.
Mayor Clay presented the award to Dennis Schmidt; Mr. Schmidt thanked Council,
the City, his boss and his family for their support and spoke about his work on
CTAC.
2. Introduction of Lt. John Hough, Atascadero Police Department by Chief
Dennis Hegwood.
Chief Hegwood presented Lt. Hough to Council and spoke about his experience and
background.
•
CC 02/25/03 - 04 2 u
ITEM NUMBER: A- 1
DATE: 03/11/2003
COMMUNITY FORUM:
Ray Jansen, 6655 Country Club Drive, read his letter to the editor expressing his views
on terrorism and war.
Myra Douglas, 8005 EI Rutero Avenue, spoke about De Anza Day, March 4 t and
invited the Council to walk a section of the Juan Bautista De Anza national historic trail,
next Tuesday. (Exhibit A)
Susan Brown, 1000 South River Road, representing the Literacy Council of San Luis
Obispo, thanked Council for their support last year and requested it be continued for this
year.
Mayor Clay closed the Community Forum period.
COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS:
Council Member O'Malley asked to discuss at a future meeting the issue of mixed-use
zoning and the ordinance needed to implement it; this would be to give staff some
Council input in drafting the ordinance, but would not involve a vote and would be
agendized under Management Reports.
. Community Development Director Frace indicated that this item would be brought
before the Planning Commission at their next meeting for consideration of a draft
ordinance. He suggested bringing this item back to the Council after the Planning
Commission meeting, including the Commission's recommendation, and then Council
could give staff direction on how best to bring it before Council.
There was further Council discussion in support of allowing this issue to proceed
according to City protocol, and subsequently Council Member O'Malley withdrew his
request.
Mayor Clay announced that he spoke to Paso Robles Mayor Mecham concerning the
homeless shelter issue. Mayor Clay asked him for financial support for the North
County shelter being proposed in Atascadero and other issues of mutual cooperation
were discussed.
1. Official Invocation at City Council Meetings — Discussion and
Direction
■ Item comes before City Council at its own direction for discussion, without specific
recommendation either for or against the policy.
City Attorney Roy Hanley gave the staff report and answered questions of Council.
•
CC 02/25/03
Page 3 �I
ITEM NUMBER: A- 1
DATE: 03/11/2003
PUBLIC COMMENT
John Davis Pastor Christ Chapel, stated that he and the other clergy i
p gy n Atascadero
would be very glad to lead the Council in prayer.
Council Member O'Malley asked Pastor Davis if he felt clergy would prefer to limit their
invocations to the parameters set by the City at a preset time or to have the freedom to
design their own prayer during the Public Comment period. Pastor Davis answered that
he would be glad to present these options to the other clergy and report back with their
answer.
Joan O'Keefe, 9985 Old Morro East, stated she supports clergy speaking at the public
comment period of the Council meetings. She said she supports the separation of
church and state.
Ray Jansen observed that Jesus was quite adamant in condemning people who spoke
in public about their faith and admonished them to do their praying in private. Also he
shared a prayer closing he prefers.
Ellen Beraud, 9608 Morro Road, stated she does not support combining prayer with
politics.
Mayor Clay closed the Public Comment period.
Mayor Clay suggested moving the Public Comment to after the Pledge of Allegiance.
•
Y Y 99 9 9 9
There was Council discussion on this issue.
MOTION: By Council Member Scalise and seconded by Council Member
O'Malley to rearrange Council agendas to have Public
Comment immediately follow Introductions and that the City
send a letter to the Ministerial Association letting them know
of this change to the Council's agenda and that the City would
offer them, as a courtesy, to be the first speaker during Public
Comment.
Motion passed 4:1 by a roll-call vote. (Luna opposed)
2. Commission Appointments
■ Staff recommendation: Council:
a. Introduce for first reading by title only the draft Ordinance, amending Section 2-
9.02 and Section 2-13.03 of the Atascadero Municipal Code relating to the
appointment of Planning Commission Members and Parks and Recreation
Commission Members; and,
b. Direct selected Council Members to appoint Commissioners and the City Council
approve the appointments.
City Manager Wade McKinney gave the staff report and answered questions of Council. •
CC 02/25/03 . ,
Page 4
ITEM NUMBER: A- 1
DATE: 03/11/2003
•
PUBLIC COMMENT
Bill Bright, 11875 Santa Lucia, stated he supports the removal of Commissioners by a
majority of the Council
Mayor Clay closed the Public Comment period.
MOTION: By Council Member O'Malley and seconded by Mayor Clay to
accept the staff recommendations as stated with the following
amendments...
Mayor Clay recessed the hearing at 8;23 p.m.
Mayor Clay called the meeting back to order 8:30 at p.m.
MOTION: By Council Member O'Malley and seconded by Mayor Clay to
introduce for first reading by title only the draft Ordinance,
amending Section 2-9.02 and Section 2-13.03 of the
Atascadero Municipal Code relating to the appointment of
Planning Commission Members and Parks and Recreation
Commission Members with the following amendments:
• Section 2-9.02: The terms of appointment for the
pp directly
appointed members of the Planning Commission shall be four
years and expire on December 31, or until the
appointing Council member vacates office.
Section 2-9.02: in the event that the appointing City Counr.11
member has YaGated effiGe the appointment shall be made by
of the � aGa Gibe f eunnil member in the event that }I�e
vr-crr�-�crvut�-vrc�--.vvarrv-n--rrrcrrrsa member.�rrcrr�cT
�e unril position has not been file
TaEi QtCtl--b'�y—V$wrrvr-Pararcrvn—rncc-a—rr0'��accr�rrrcd---by
appointment ent or eleGtion an ointment to the •e.+Gat
upFBTn crr�-rr�vrcrcvrr , rrrrrcrrrcrrc-cv--arra-ravac
vv n1 ovn term
+-may,entireu d esJ- ave to bei made y a
majority-votes-of � tGounGi1. Ansi sunh appointment
shall be for the remainder of that unevnired term
Section 2-9.02: Two (2) members shall be appointed by a
majority vote of the entire Council. Those two positions shall
be appointed for terms of two years commencing Cebr,.nr.e
2005 January 1. 2005 and expiring December
i
CC 02/25/03 •�
Page 5 u V
ITEM NUMBER: A-1
DATE: 03/11/2003
Section 2-13.03: The terms of appointment for the directly
appointed members of the Parks and Recreation Commission •
shall be four years and expire on da-nuary 31- December 31, or
until the appointing Council member vacates office.
Section 2-13.03 in the event that the appointing b`it`e reune'1
membeF has vaGated effiGe the appointment shall bee --ade by
the rite• Coune•il member appointed or eleGteed to fulfill the ter
0 e • aGattin 4y r it member In the event that the
City ..@tF1�r--rrrcn-ra
appointment nt or eleet%e�j an appointment to Itr
IV a-t.a- J
``6'``1ommm�'rssi+on t -Flea , --no�•i�ewye� j�
have b ••r!ac+�-ptrt' a
m to f emir it Any-
shall
n.� e...e.h eppeintmep�
„Taffy--vet�ert#e ��.,-e-6 e�as���.
shall he fGF the remainder of that unexpired term
Section 2-13.03: Two (2) members shall be appointed by a
majority vote of the entire Council. Those two positions shall
be appointed for terms of two years commencing €eiFuFary !t
2005 January 1. 2005 and expiring january 31, 2007 December
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote.
NOMINATION: By Mayor Pro Tem Luna of Joan O'Keefe to the Atascadero •
Planning Commission.
NOMINATION: By Council Member Pacas of Ellen Beraud to the
Atascadero Planning Commission.
NOMINATION: By Council Member Scalise to re-appoint Grigger Jones to
the Atascadero Planning Commission.
MOTION: By Council Member O'Malley and seconded by Mayor Clay to
accept these appointments.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote.
NOMINATION: By Mayor Pro Tem Luna to re-appoint Rick Mathews to the
Parks and Recreation Commission.
NOMINATION: By Mayor Clay of Lou Coppo to the Parks and Recreation
Commission.
Council Members Scalise and Pacas chose to wait on nominating a candidate at
this time.
•
CC 02/25/03 i
Page 6
ITEM NUMBER: A- 1
DATE: 03/11/2003
• MOTION: By Mayor Pro Tem Luna and seconded by Mayor Clay to
approve the two nominations.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote.
There was Council consensus to direct the City Clerk to advertise for the two
vacant positions to the Parks and Recreation Commission and to have applicants
fill out an application and supplemental questionnaire.
A. CONSENT CALENDAR:
1. City Council Minutes - February 11, 2003
■ City Clerk recommendation: City Council approve the City Council minutes of
February 11, 2003. [City Clerk]
2. January Disbursements -January 2003 Accounts Payable & Payroll
■ Fiscal impact: $1,470,463.34.
■ Staff recommendation: City Council approve certified City accounts payable, payroll
and payroll vendor checks for January 2003. [Administrative Services]
3. Request for Designation of the Integrated Waste Management
Authority as Atascadero's Local Enforcement Agency
■ Fiscal impact: None.
■ Staff recommendation: Council adopt draft Resolution, withdrawing the designation
of the San Luis Obispo County Health Department, Division of Environmental Health,
as Atascadero's Local Enforcement Agency, and approving the designation of the
San Luis Obispo County Integrated Waste Management Authority as Atascadero's
Local Enforcement Agency. [City Manager]
4. Zone Change 2002-0031- 9105 & 9127 San Diego Road (Mehring /
Twin Cities Surveys)
■ Fiscal impact: The project would likely have a slight negative impact on City
revenues. As a general rule, single-family dwellings require services that exceed
the revenue generated by the dwelling.
■ Staff recommendations: City Council introduce for second reading by title only,
and adopt the draft Ordinance, enacting Zone Change 2002-0031; and amend
the City's Zoning Map to add a PD-16 overlay district to the project area.
[Community Development]
City Clerk Marcia McClure Torgerson pulled Item #A-4 and handed out the correct
ordinance for Council consideration.
MOTION: By Council Member O'Malley and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem
Luna to accept Items #A-1, 2 and 3.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. (Item #A-3 Resolution
No. 2003-005)
• Item #A-4: Council Member Scalise stated that there is confusion over staffs
interpretation of what the Planning Commission recommended to the City Council,
CC 02/25/03
Page7 ��
ITEM NUMBER: A- 1
DATE: 03/11/2003
Mayor Clay suggested sending this issue back to the Planning Commission for
clarification. There was Council discussion on this item. •
MOTION: By Mayor Pro Tem Luna and seconded by Council Member
Pacas to introduce for second reading by title only, and adopt
the draft Ordinance, enacting Zone Change 2002-0031; and
amend the City's Zoning Map to add a PD-16 overlay district to
the project area.
Motion passed 3:2 by a roll-call vote. (Scalise and Clay
opposed)
B. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. Development Impact Fee Adjustments
• Fiscal impact: Actual revenues are not estimated; they will offset expenses
associated with providing services to new development.
■ Staff recommendation: Council accept public comment and provide direction to staff
to return the item for the next Council agenda with an implementing ordinance for
consideration of adoption. [City Manager]
Assistant City Manager Brady Cherry gave the staff report and answered questions of
Council. He explained that he would conduct this item as a study session for the
Council. Mr. Cherry introduced Scott Thorpe, Senior Vice President of Revenue and
Cost Specialists, the consultant who prepared the impact fee report for Council.
Scott Thorpe discussed development impact fees in detail and answered questions of
Council.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Will Mehring, 11190 Santa Lucia, asked for clarification on several items covered in the
proposal.
Don Ritter, Pino Solo Avenue, expressed his view that the taxpayers have been
subsidizing homebuilders over the last few years due to the lowered fees.
Lee Gustafson, 885 Wild Oats Way, Templeton, addressed the commercial aspect of
impact fees.
Jeff Borges, Templeton, stated he had purchased property on EI Camino Real with the
intent of building houses in the $250,000 to $275,000 range. He is concerned that the
fees may punish the majority of the people who cannot afford a median house price in
the community.
Dean Coker, 9360 Atascadero Avenue, urged the Council to carefully study the impact
of impact fees. •
CC 02/25/03
Page 8 U.1 0
ITEM NUMBER: A- 1
DATE: 03/11/2003
• David Harrell asked for clarification on the some of the statistics within the proposal.
Robert Fonzi, 7888 Sinaloa, asked if the Council could look carefully at the circulation
figures contained in the proposal, and the impact on planned unit developments.
Mayor Clay closed the Public Comment period.
Mr. Thorpe answered the questions asked by the public.
Council Members gave staff direction as to specific items they would like addressed
during staff's next presentation on this issue.
Mayor Clay recessed the hearing at 10:38 p.m.
Mayor Clay called the meeting back to order at 10:46 p.m.
2. Residential Second Unit Code Text Amendment - Zone Change 2003-
0039
■ Fiscal impact: None.
■ Planning Commission recommendation: City Council introduce for first reading, by
title only, draft Ordinance A amending the Zoning Ordinance to allow second units in
• the RSF-Y Zoning district subject to performance standards. [Community
Development]
Council Member Pacas announced that she would be stepping down on this item, as
her parents own four lots within the new SFR-Y Zone that will be affected by this
ordinance.
Community Development Director Warren Frace gave the staff report and answered
questions of Council.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Joan O'Keefe, 9985 Old Morro Road East, expressed her concern with second units
and the required septic systems and their impact on existing trees. She also explained
to the Council what the Planning Commission discussed.
MOTION: By Mayor Pro Tem Luna and seconded by Council Member
O'Malley to continue the meeting past 11:00 p.m.
Motion passed 4:0 by a voice vote.
Joanne Main, 8940 San Gabriel Road, encouraged the Council to approve this
amendment.
• Jerry McDaniel stated he supports this amendment.
CC 02/25/03
Page 9
ITEM NUMBER: A-1
DATE: 03/11/2003
Mayor Clay closed the Public Comment period. •
MOTION: By Council Member O'Malley and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem
Luna to adopt the staff recommendation with the change of
returning the enclosed parking back to covered or enclosed.
There was Council discussion regarding the issue of septic systems for second units.
MOTION: By Council Member O'Malley and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem
Luna to introduce for first reading by title only, the draft
Ordinance amending the Zoning Ordinance to allow second
units in the RSF-Y Zoning district subject to performance
standards, with the following amendment: change of returning
the enclosed parking back to covered or enclosed.
Motion passed 4:0 by a roll-call vote. (Pacas abstained)
C. MANAGEMENT REPORTS:
1. Legislative Priorities 2003
■ Fiscal impact: None.
■ Staff recommendation: Council:
1. Adopt draft Resolution A establishing the City's legislative priorities for 2003; and,
2. Adopt draft Resolution B providing for a voluntary payroll deduction for Action for
Better Cities. [City Manager]
City Manager Wade McKinney explained this item to the Council and introduced Dave
Mullinax, Regional Representative of the League of California Cities.
Mr. Mullinax explained the League's Grassroots Program and asked the Council to
approve the proposed Resolutions.
MOTION: By Council Member O'Malley and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem
Luna to adopt the draft Resolutions as recommended by staff.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote.
(Resolutions No. 2003-006 and 2003-007)
2. CDBG Annual Allocation
■ Fiscal impact: Available funds are estimated at$227,674 for the 2003 cycle.
■ Staff recommendation: City Council forward to the County Board of Supervisors
allocation recommendations for the 2003 Community Development Block Grant
(CDBG)funds. [Public Works]
Administrative Assistant Valerie Humphrey gave a brief staff report and answered
questions of Council
•
CC
Pa e10 /03 012
9
ITEM NUMBER: A- 1
DATE: 03/11/2003
PUBLIC COMMENT
•
Joan O'Keefe discussed the revolving loan fund, the two loans currently under
consideration, and the remaining funds still sitting at HUD. She urged Council to
consider using the money available for a worthy project where it would otherwise be
difficult to come up with the needed funds.
Mayor Clay closed the Public Comment period.
MOTION: By Council Member Scalise and seconded by Council Membep
O'Malley to approve the recommendation for the 2003
Community Development Block Grant Funds as presented by
staff.
Motion passed 4:1 by a roll-call vote. (Clay opposed)
D. COMMITTEE & LIAISON REPORTS: None
E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION:
City Council
• Mayor Pro Tem.Luna asked staff to look into the charging of development fees
on county properties that will use City services. There was not Council
consensus.
F. ADJOURNMENT:
Mayor Clay adjourned the meeting at 11:52 p.m. to the next regularly scheduled
meeting on March 11, 2003.
MEETING RECORDED AND MINUTES PREPARED BY:
Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk
The following exhibits are available for review in the City Clerk's office:
Exhibit A - Myra Douglas, De Anza Day letter
•
CC 02/25/03 016
Page 11
ITEM NUMBER: A-2
DATE: 03/11/2003
R
■i ■11 1 ■
1918 1976
Atascadero City Council
Staff Report— Administrative Services Department
2002 Audit Report
RECOMMENDATION:
Council review and accept the audit report for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002.
DISCUSSION:
The firm of Moss, Levy and Hartzheim performed the audit and a representative of the firm will
be at the Council meeting to present the audit.
General Fund
• As expected, 2001-2002 was another good financial year for the City of Atascadero. The City
continued to see strong growth in revenues. General Fund revenues came in at $12,750,393,
which exceeded budget projections by almost $238,000. Continued strong building activity
accounted for most of this revenue variance. General Fund expenditures and transfers came in at
$11,374,318, which was significantly under budget. The variance in expenditures was caused by
several factors including position vacancies, the timing of some grant expenditures and the
timing of various capital expenditures.
The City had budgeted an unreserved fund balance of almost $2.9 million dollars at June 30,
2002, however with the excess revenues and vacancy savings, the unreserved fund balance came
in at over $3.2 million. This increase in the reserve is in accordance with the Council's financial
strategic plan. The reserves set aside in these good economic times will help sustain us through
the more uncertain economic times ahead.
Other Funds
In fiscal year 2001-2002, the City spent almost $3,600,000 on capital expenditures. Some of the
expenditures included the purchase of the Youth Center, the Azucena Drainage Project, the
purchase of a new fire engine, the Suggested Routes to School Project, the Traffic Way Storm
Drain Project, the El Camino Bikeway II Project, the start of the Atascadero Road Program
projects and the Santa Ysabel Project, various building improvement projects, and the
continuation of technology and vehicle replacement.
•
ATTACHMENT: Financial Statements for the Year Ended June 30,2002
4
ITEM NUMBER: A-3
DATE: 03/11/2003
a
rap, o
tt
Y9i8 19 9
Atascadero City Council
Staff Report- City Manager's Office
Commission Appointments
RECOMMENDATIONS:
City Council:
1. Adopt, on second reading by title only, the draft Ordinance, amending the Atascadero
Municipal Code relating to the appointment of members of the Planning and the Parks
and Recreation Commissions; and,
2. Adopt the draft Resolution outlining procedures for implementation of the Ordinance
concerning appointment of members of the Planning and the Parks and Recreation
• Commissions.
DISCUSSION:
Background: This issue was first addressed by the City Council at its strategic planning
sessions. Staff was directed to create amendments to the Atascadero Municipal Code creating a
procedure for the direct appointment of five members and the majority appointment of two at-
large members of the planning and parks and recreation commissions. At the council meeting of
February 25, 2003, after hearing public testimony as well, the council made amendments to and
then introduced for first reading by title only the attached ordinance. This matter now returns for
second reading. The ordinance must have two readings to be passed. If any changes are made at
this meeting, that will constitute a "first reading." If no changes are made, the ordinance may be
adopted at this meeting. The ordinance will then be published, and it will be effective thirty days
after its passage. The ordinance will be effective thirty days after adoption on second reading.
Staff has also brought forward a proposed amended resolution governing the procedures used by
staff and Council to implement the ordinance. The resolution does not require two readings. It
can be amended as required at this council meeting. The resolution does not supercede the
ordinance, but is intended to help staff follow procedures to comply with the new appointment
methods.
•
015
ITEM NUMBER: A-3
DATE: 03/11/2003
FISCAL IMPACT: •
There have been no fiscal impacts identified on this issue.
ALTERNATIVES:
The Council may choose not to further address the problem by way of legislation.
ATTACHMENT:
1. Draft Ordinance
2. Draft Resolution
•
DRAFT ORDINANCE
•
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ATASCADERO AMENDING SECTION 2-9.02 OF THE ATASCADERO
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE APPOINTMENT OF
PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS AND REVISING SECTION
2-13.03 OF THE ATASCADERO MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE
APPOINTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
MEMBERS
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Atascadero has previously adopted codes for
the appointment of members to the Planning Commission and to the Parks and Recreation
Commission; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Atascadero finds that the following changes
to the Atascadero Municipal Code are reasonably necessary to promote the health, safety and
welfare of the citizens of Atascadero;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO does ordain
as follows:
. Section 1. Atascadero Municipal Code section 2-9.02 is amended to read as follows:
2-9.02 Members: Appointment: Terms of office.
The City Council shall appoint members of the Planning Commission as follows: Two (2)
members shall be appointed by a majority vote of the entire Council. Those two positions shall
be appointed for terms of two years commencing February 1, 2005 and expiring January 31,
2007. Except as modified below the remaining five (5) members shall be directly appointed by
each individual City Council Member in the February following the election at which the City
Council member is elected. The terms of appointment for the directly appointed members of the
Planning Commission shall be four years and expire on January 31. Appointments may be made
after the commencement of a term to fill a vacancy or removal, in which case the term of office
shall be for the balance of the unexpired term. In the event that a member at large (appointed by
a majority vote of the entire Council) resigns or is removed, the vacancy shall be filled by a
majority vote of the entire City Council. In the event that a member directly appointed by a City
Council member resigns or is removed,the vacancy shall be filled by the individual City Council
member that made the appointment of the resigning or removed planning commission member.
In the event that the appointing City Council member has vacated office the appointment shall be
made by the City Council member appointed or elected to fulfill the term of the vacating City
Council member. In the event that the vacated City Council position has not been filled by
appointment or election, an appointment to the vacated planning commission term may, but does
not have to be, made by a majority vote of the entire Council. Any such appointment shall be for
the remainder of that unexpired term. All members shall serve at the pleasure of the City Council
and may continue to serve after expiration of the stated term, with the approval of the City
• Council,until such time as a successor is selected according to the procedures set for the above.
Section 2. Atascadero Municipal Code section 2-13.03 is amended to read as follows:
2-13.03 Members: Appointment: Terms of office. •
The City Council shall appoint members of the Parks and Recreation Commission as follows:
Two (2) members shall be appointed by a majority vote of the entire Council. Those two
positions shall be appointed for terms of two years commencing February 1, 2005 and expiring
January 31, 2007. Except as modified below the remaining five (5) members shall be directly
appointed by each individual City Council Member in the February following the election at
which the City Council member is elected. The terms of appointment for the directly appointed
members of the Parks and Recreation Commission shall be four years and expire on January 31.
Appointments may be made after the commencement of a term to fill a vacancy or removal, in
which case the term of office shall be for the balance of the unexpired term. In the event that a
member at large (appointed by a majority vote of the entire Council) resigns or is removed, the
vacancy shall be filled by a majority vote of the entire City Council. In the event that a member
directly appointed by a City Council member resigns or is removed, the individual City Council
member that made the appointment of the resigning or removed commission member shall
appoint a new Commissioner to fill the vacancy. In the event that the appointing City Council
member has vacated office, the appointment shall be made by the City Council member
appointed or elected to fulfill the term of the vacating City Council member. In the event that the
vacated City Council position has not been filled by appointment or election, an appointment to
the vacated commission term may, but does not have to be, made by a majority vote of the entire
Council. Any such appointment shall be for the remainder of that unexpired term. All members
shall serve at the pleasure of the City Council and may continue to serve after expiration of the
stated term, with the approval of the City Council, until such time as a successor is selected
according to the procedures set for the above. •
Section 3. All other provisions and sections of the Atascadero Municipal Code in effect on the
days preceding the passage of this ordinance shall remain in full force and effect upon passage of
this ordinance.
Section 4. This ordinance shall not be interpreted in any manner in conflict with controlling
provisions of state law, including without limitation, the Constitution of the State of California.
If any section, subsection or clause of this ordinance shall be deemed to be unconstitutional or
otherwise invalid, the validity of the remaining sections, subsections and clauses shall not be
affected thereby.
Section 5. Within fifteen (15) days after passage, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be
published one time in a newspaper of general circulation in the City. This ordinance is to become
effective thirty(30) days from the date of adoption.
• PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF MARCH, 2002, by the following
vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Jerry L. Clay, Sr., Mayor
ATTEST:
Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney
Gig
DRAFT RESOLUTION
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING REVISED PROCEDURES FOR
THE SELECTION OF COMMITTEE, COMMISSION AND BOARD MEMBERS
WHEREAS, 1. The Atascadero City Council recognizes that citizen participation in
local government plays an important and active role in the City of Atascadero; and
WHEREAS,2. The Atascadero City Council has established committees, commissions
and boards to assist in the conduct of municipal affairs; and
WHEREAS, 3. The Atascadero City Council did adopt Resolution No. 35-81 on
November 9, 1981 establishing selection procedures for committees, commissions and boards;
and
WHEREAS, 4. The Atascadero City Council did adopt Resolution No. 23-95 revision
Resolution 35-81, establishing selection procedures for committees, commissions and boards;
and
WHEREAS, 5. The Atascadero City Council did adopt Resolution 23-97 revising
Resolution 35-81, establishing selection procedures for committees, commissions and boards;
and
WHEREAS, 6. The Atascadero City Council desires to update and revise said selection
procedures; and
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of
Atascadero as follows:
SECTION 1. Purpose. The purpose of this resolution is to revise established procedures
for the Council to follow in recruiting, selecting and appointing members to City committees,
commissions and boards created pursuant to statute or by action of the City Council.
Appointments and replacements will be made pursuant to the provisions of Government Code
Section 54970 et seq., and the following. The City Council has ordained that appointments to the
Planning Commission and to the Parks and Recreation Commission are to be made as follows:
Five individual appointments and two at large appointments. The at large appointments are to be
made by a majority vote of the City Council.
SECTON 2. Recruitment Nomination, and Eli ig bility. Announcements of openings for
any committee, commission or board to which members are appointed by the City Council will
be coordinated by the City Clerk. Any person desiring to be considered for appointment to any
City committee, commission or board may complete an application provided by the City Clerk.
Applications are accepted year-round and shall remain on file for a period of one year from the •
• date received. Applicants may be considered for future vacancies, for the specific committee,
commission or board for which they applied, should a vacancy occur during the year. At any
regularly scheduled or a special council meeting properly noticed for that purpose, any member
of the City Council may also nominate a person to be considered for at large appointments to any
City committee, commission or board.
All applicants and nominees shall be a resident and registered voter of the City of
Atascadero, and shall meet any announced additional criteria as established by the City Council.
All appointees are subject to financial disclosure,pursuant to the Political Reform Act.
SECTION 3. Interviews. All applicant and nominees meeting the criteria established in
Section 2 may be interviewed by the City Council during a properly noticed meeting.
Interviews, if held, will be open to the public. An individual council member is not required to
interview candidates for individual appointments, but may do so if they wish.
SECTION 4. Selection of at large members of the Planning Commission and the Parks
and Recreation Commission, and of members of other commissions.
a. Council members will vote for the candidate(s) of their choice by placing their
name and circling the name of their selection(s) on a ballot form provided by
the City Clerk. Candidates' names will be placed in alphabetical order on the
ballot form.
b. After the City Council has had an opportunity to make its individual
determination, the City Clerk will collect the ballots and will announce first
the Councilmember's name and second the name(s) of the candidate(s) of that
Councilmember's choice(s). Results of each individual Councilmember vote
will be a matter of public record.
c. The candidate or candidates receiving a majority of the votes of the
Councilmembers present shall be appointed. In the event that no candidate or
candidates receive a majority vote or in the event of a tie vote, then a run-off
ballot or ballots will be cast, following the procedure of sub-paragraph a.
above. The run-off candidates will consist of all candidates receiving at least
two (2) votes and if not more than one of the candidates have received at least
two (2) votes, then all those receiving a least one (1) vote will participate in
the runoff balloting. This procedure shall be continued until a majority vote is
cast, or until a majority of the council votes to reopen nomination. In such
event the matter may be tabled until the next regularly scheduled council
meeting for further nominations.
On motion by Councilperson seconded by Councilperson .
the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll
call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ADOPTED:
ATTEST: CITY OF ATASCADERO
Marcia M. Torgerson, City Clerk Jerry L. Clay, Sr., Mayor
Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney
•
n ;
ITEM NUMBER: A-4
DATE: 03/11/2003
■ a;® ■ ■
R
seta is e
• CAD
Atascadero City Council
Staff Report - Community Development Department
Residential Second Unit Code Text Amendment
Zone Change 2003-0039
RECOMMENDATION:
City Council adopt on second reading by title only, the draft Ordinance, amending the Zoning
Ordinance to allow second units in the RSF-Y Zoning district subject to performance standards.
DISCUSSION:
. The proposed project consists of zone code text change. The proposed zone change (ZCH 2003-
0039) would amend the existing ordinance to allow second residential dwelling units in the RSF-
Y (residential single family 1-acre minimum) zoning district subject to performance standards
and consistent with General Plan Program HOS 3.1.2.
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
ATTACHMENT: Draft Ordinance
•
Attachment: Draft Ordinance •
DRAFT ORDINANCE
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO APPROVING ZONE
CHANGE 2003-0039 TO AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO
ALLOW RESIDENTIAL SECOND UNITS IN THE RSF-Y ZONING
DISTRICT SUBJECT TO PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
(ZCH 2003-0039: Second Units)
WHEREAS, the City of Atascadero's 2025 General Plan has prioritized the provision of
affordable housing; and,
WHEREAS, the State of California has identified residential second units as an
important means to providing affordable housing in single-family neighborhoods; and,
WHEREAS,the General Plan contains Program HOS 3.1.2. that calls for the adoption of
an ordinance allowing second units in the RSF-Y zoning district subject to performance
standards; and, •
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, at a duly noticed
Public Hearing held on February 4, 2003 considered a recommendation to the City Council, and,
WHEREAS,the Planning Commission has determined that it is in the best interest of the
City to update the Zoning Ordinance to allow residential second unit to ensure the orderly
provision of affordable housing throughout the community; and,
WHEREAS, the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and public notice of
environmental documents, as set forth in the State and local guidelines for implementation of the
California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)have been adhered to; and,
WHEREAS, the Atascadero City Council, at a duly noticed Public Hearing held on
February 25, 2003 considered the project and the Planning Commission's recommendation;
NOW,THEREFORE,the City Council takes the following actions:
•
0f:4
• SECTION 1. FINDINGS OF CONSISTENCY WITH 2002 GENERAL PLAN EIR
1. The proposed project has been analyzed adequately in the 2002 General Plan EIR
pursuant to applicable standards and impacts have been avoided or mitigated pursuant
to that EIR.
SECTION 2. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF ZONE TEXT CHANGE.
1. The zone change is consistent with General Plan policies and all other applicable
ordinances and policies of the City.
2. Amendment of the zoning ordinance will provide for the orderly development of
affordable housing throughout the community.
3. The zone change will not, in itself, result in significant environmental impacts.
SECTION 3.APPROVAL.
The Atascadero City Council, in a regular session assembled on February 25, 2003 resolved to
introduce for first reading by title only an ordinance that would amend the Zoning Ordinance as
• follows:
9-3.153 Conditional uses.
The following uses may be allowed in the Residential Single Family Zone. The
establishment of conditional uses shall be as provided by Section 9-2.109:
(a) Churches and related activities (see Section 9-6.121);
(b) Schools (see Section 9-6.125);
(c) Mobilehome developments (see Section 9-6.143);
(d) Skilled nursing facility, where the number of residents under care is greater than
six (see Section 9-6.134);
(e) Residential care, where the number of residents under care is greater than six
(see Section 9-6.135);
(f) Organizational houses;
(g) Pipeline;
(h) Bed and breakfast;
(i) Caretaker residence (see Section 9-6.104);
(j) The following uses where established in a residential structure of historical
importance are satisfied:
(1) Broadcasting studios,
• (2) Business support services,
(3) Libraries and museums,
G 121 5
(4) Offices,
(5) Personal services, •
(6) School-business and vocational;
(k) Kennels (see Section 9-6.1 1 1). (Ord. 68 § 9-3.153, 1983)
(1) Residential Second Units (RSF-Y only) (see Section 9.6106)
9-3.154 Minimum lot size.
The minimum lot size in the Residential Single Family Zone shall be twenty
thousand (20,000) sq aFe feet with nnwnr, one-half (1/2) acre vv-reT"G--^Se^cw . is—"rv^+[
awe-and may range up to two and one-half (2%) acres. The size of a lot shall
be consistent with the land use designation set forth in the General Plan and shall
be indicated by the symbols set forth in the following chart, which shall be shown
on the official zoning maps as provided by Section 9-3.104(d).
Symbol Minimum Lot Size
X-One-half ('/2) acre net area (excluding-
land needed for street rights-of-way
whether publicly or privately owned).
Y One (1) acre net area (excluding land
needed for street rights-of-way •
whether publicly or privately owned)
when seweFs aFe available-.
One and one half H 13�) aeFes, Men
seweFs aFe net available.
Z One and one-half 0 %) to two and one-
half (2Y2) acres based on performance
standards set forth in this section.
(a) Performance Standards. The following performance standards shall be evaluated
for each lot which is appended with the "Z" symbol in determining its minimum lot
size:
(1) Distance from the Center of the Community. Using the Atascadero
Administration Building as the center of the community, the lot size factor based on
this performance standard shall be:
Distance1 Lot Size Factor
I
0 -- 4000' 0.08
4000' -- 6000' 0.10
6000' -- 8000' 10.12
&'�_
• 1 . To be measured as radial distance using map maintained in the Planning
Department.
(2) Septic Suitability. Using generalized soils data from the Soil Conservation
Service Reports, the lot size factor based on this performance standard shall be:
SCS Rating1 Lot Size Factor
Well suited 10.30
Moderate or slow 10.50
Severe 10.70
1 . Refer to map maintained in Community Development Department.
Percolation tests may be substituted for the Soil Conservation Service Reports.
These shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer or licensed sanitarian. The
following conversion chart shall be used to determine the appropriate lot size
factor:
Percolation Rating• (Minutes Per Inch i
(Well suited Less than 20
Moderate 120 to 39
Slow 40 to 59
Severe IGreater than 60
(3) Average Slope. Using the Basic, Sectional or Contour.Measurement Method, the
lot size factor based on this performance standard shall be:
Slope Lot Size Factor
10 - 20% 10.30
21 -- 30% 0.50
31% + ' 0.70
(4) Condition of Access. Using the road right-of-way with the shortest accessible
distance between a lot and an improved collector road, the lot size factor based on
this performance standard shall be:
•
Ut f.
ConditionLot Size •
Factor
paved with slope of less than 15% or
City-accepted 0.15
paved with slope of greater than 15% 0.20
all-weather surface with slope of less 0.25
than 15%
all-weather surface with slope of 0.30
greater than 15%
unimproved surface 0.40
(5) General Neighborhood Character. Using the average lot size of existing lots
(except that lots larger than five (5) acres shall be excluded unless they constitute
more than twenty-five (25) percent of the total number of lots) within a one
thousand (1000) foot radius, the minimum lot size factor based on this performance
standard shall be determined by multiplying the average lot size by 0.2.
(b) Determination of Minimum Lot Size. The minimum lot size shall be determined
by the sum of each of the lot size factors for the performance standards set forth in
subsection (a) of this section.
(1) The most current information shall be used to determine the lot size factor.
Where information is not available, the Planning Director shall determine which lot
size factor shall apply,
(2) If more than one lot size factor can be applied to a lot, the less restrictive factor
shall be used.
(3) Lot size factors shall be based on conditions in existence at the time of filing an
application unless information is included with the application which will alter a lot
size factor. (Ord. 184 § 2, 1989; Ord. 175 § 2 (part), 1988; Ord. 154 § 2, 1987;
Ord. 152 § 2, 1987; Ord. 145 § 3 (part), 1987; Ord. 113 § 2 (part), 1985; Ord. 68
§ 9-3.154, 1983)
9-6.106 Residential accessory uses.
The standards of this section apply to the specific types of residential accessory
structures listed. Agricultural accessory structures for the keeping of animals are
subject to Section 9-6.112.
(a) Accessory Greenhouse. An accessory greenhouse may occupy up to five
hundred (500) square feet per dwelling unit or ten (10) percent of the site,
whichever is smaller. Larger greenhouses are subject to Section 9-6.116 where
allowed.
A) Guesthouses. A guesthouse may be established as an aeeessory use to a
residenceOnthe A,, RSA LSF, OFQ-rSF Zone as felloausa
(1) Limitation on Use. A guesthouse as nGt t- be used for residential occupaney
• of feoi-1 A n„ec+thn„cn is net to be used as n rlwnllir+ry unit fvrrtii'rtcalr-
(2) LeeatTe'n. A guesthouses net to be Innat dywithin T'any F egU{i{ecl settbaek area.
(3) Meters SepaFate meters are not allowed fnr n esthe„ses
(b) Residential Second Units. A residential second unit may be established as an
accessory use to a residence in the RSF-Y or LSF-Y zoning district as follows:
(1 ) Lot Size: The net lot area shall be 1-acre minimum.
(2) Sewer: The second unit shall be connected to City sewer where available.
Secondary engineered septic systems may be approved by the City Engineer.
(3) Water: The second unit shall be served by a public water supply.
(4) Meters: Separate utilities meters may be installed for second units.
(5) Floor area: The maximum residential floor area shall be 800 square feet.
(6) Parking: One enclosed parking space shall be provided.
(7) Setbacks: The same setback requirements of a primary residential dwelling
shall apply to secondary units.
(8) Appearance: The secondary unit shall be architecturally compatible with the
Primary residential dwelling.
(9) Grading: Site grading and native tree removals shall be minimized to the
greatest extent possible.
(10) The unit shall be compatible with the surrounding neighborhood.
(c) Swimming Pools. Swimming pools, including hot tubs, spas, and related
equipment, may be located within any required side or rear setback, provided that
they are no closer than eighteen (18) inches to a property line, and provided that
they are fenced as required by Section 9-6.128.
(d) Workshops or Studios. Any accessory structure intended solely or primarily for
engaging in artwork, crafts, light hand manufacturing, mechanical work, etc., is
subject to the following standards when located in a residential zone:
(1) Limits on Use. An accessory structure may be constructed or used as a
workshop or studio in any residential zone solely for noncommercial hobbies or
amusements; for maintenance of the principal structure or yards; for artistic
endeavors such as painting, photography or sculpture; maintenance or mechanical
work on vehicles owned or operated by the occupants; for an approved home
occupation; or for other similar purposes.
(2) Floor Area. A workshop is not to occupy an area greater than fifty (50) percent
of the floor area of the principal structure. (Ord. 68 § 9-6.106, 1983)
0
SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. •
This ordinance shall be effective a 12:01 a.m. on the 31St day after its final passage.
On motion by Council Member , and seconded by Council Member
the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ADOPTED:
By:
Jerry L. Clay, Sr., Mayor
Attest:
Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk
Approved as to form:
Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney
U JU
ITEM NUMBER: A-5
DATE: 03/11/2003
no a ■
�sran��i
Atascadero City Council
Staff Report- Community Services Department
Facility Use Agreement with Atascadero Girls Softball
RECOMMENDATION:
Council authorize the City Manager to execute a Facility Use Agreement between the City of
Atascadero and Atascadero Girls Softball.
DISCUSSION:
Atascadero Girls Softball is the primary user of the softball fields at Traffic Way Park. For
several years, the Atascadero Girls Softball organization has been instrumental in the
maintenance and upkeep of these softball fields and the adjoining concessions building and, over
the years, has taken an active role in several field improvement projects. The Atascadero Girls
Softball organization has maintained the infields of the two softball fields at Traffic Way and
completed other maintenance requirements through a "handshake" partnership that has helped
keep these softball fields in excellent condition.
This unwritten partnership has been a benefit to both Atascadero Girls Softball and the City of
Atascadero. It is now the desire of both organizations to enter into a written agreement to help
clarify the responsibilities for each. This is particularly necessary due to the annual changes in
board members for Atascadero Girls Softball.
Essentially, staff is seeking assistance from Atascadero Girls Softball for the maintenance and
upkeep of the softball fields at Traffic Way Park. In exchange for assistance with maintenance,
Atascadero Girls Softball is seeking some assurances regarding field use. Atascadero Girls
Softball seeks to be the priority user of the softball fields at Traffic Way Park during their season
of play. The City benefits from this arrangement by reducing our staffing requirements to
maintain these ball fields. The volunteer labor provided by the Atascadero Girls Softball
organization saves the City an undetermined amount of manpower each year. Staff believes that
the proposed agreement will also clarify the responsibilities of Atascadero Girls Softball.
• Staff requests that the City Council authorize the City Manager to enter into the proposed Facility
Use Agreement between the City of Atascadero and Atascadero Girls Softball. The City
currently has similar agreements with Atascadero Little League and Babe Ruth Baseball.
U:�1
ITEM NUMBER: A-5
DATE: 03/11/2003
On Thursday, February 20, 2003, the Atascadero Parks and Recreation Commission voted •
unanimously to recommend approval of the draft Facility Use Agreement between the City of
Atascadero and Atascadero Girls Softball.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The City will realize some minor savings resulting from the maintenance responsibilities
performed by Atascadero Girls Softball.
ALTERNATIVES: None.
ATTACHMENT:
Draft Facility Use Agreement
•
UJB
DRAFT
• AGREEMENT BETWEEN
ATASCADERO GIRLS SOFTBALL
AND THE
CITY OF ATASCADERO
This Agreement is made and entered into this date March 11, 2003, by and between the City of Atascadero,
and the Atascadero Girls Softball, for the maintenance, upkeep and use of Traffic Park during the perie.d
from March 1,2003 until December 31,2005.
1. PARTIES
1.1 City
1.1.1 The City of Atascadero, Atascadero, California, whose mailing address for notice
under the terms of this Agreement is as follows:
City of Atascadero
Attn: Director of Community Services
6500 Palma Avenue
Atascadero, California 93422
1.2 Atascadero Girls Softball/LESSEE
1.2.1 Atascadero Girls Softball, whose mailing address for notice under the terms of this
Agreement is as follows:
Atascadero Girls Softball
P.O. Box 1402
Atascadero, California 93423
2. TERMS
The term of this agreement shall begin on March 1, 2003. Subject to extension or sooner
termination as hereinafter provided, this agreement shall continue for the term of three (3)years,
with an option for 3 additional years upon mutual consent of both parties.
2.1 Obligations of Ataseadero Girls Softball
1. Infield material (dirt)maintenance from February 1 st until September 1 st each year,
(including base pegs) and all associated costs, under supervision of the City of Atascadero
Parks Maintenance representative.
2. Routine Custodial maintenance of the Snack Bar and Storage Room.
3. Remove all trash and litter from the playing field areas,parking lot and playground area
and place in the trash receptacles provided after any field use.
• 4. Prohibit and enforce the "No hitting into the fence"rule.
5. Immediately report any facility damage or vandalism to the City of Atascadero.
6. Limit restroom/snack-bar facility key distribution to coaches and board members only.
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ATASCADERO 1
AND ATASCADERO GIRLS SOFTBALL
L a7 a�
7. Abide by,promote and enforce the tenants of the Atascadero Youth Sportsmanship
Proclamation. (Attached)
8. During the priority use period, February 1"through September 1 St, Atascadero Girls
Softball will coordinate scheduling of the Traffic Way Park Softball fields for use on •
Sundays. Atascadero Girls Softball will maintain a signup calendar and schedule practices
in two (2) hour blocks for all organizations that satisfy the City of Atascadero insurance
and indemnification requirements.
9. Submit a Facility request form to the City of Atascadero requesting the fields for the end of
season tournament when AGS receives the date as assigned by their governing body. A
$100 cleaning deposit is required and will be refunded if the facility is left in an acceptable
condition. AGS will supply their own field prep vehicle, chalk, pitching rubbers and any
other tournament equipment. All tournament guidelines will be followed and will be
reviewed with the AGS Tournament Director prior to the beginning of the Tournament. If
the Paloma Creek Park Facility is not going to be used the AGS must contact the City of
Atascadero at the close of their tournament registration deadline.
2.2 nhligations of the City of Ataseadern
1. Extend second priority use, behind Atascadero Unified School District, of the two softball
fields at Traffic Way Park to Atascadero Girls Softball, free of charge, from February lst
until September 1 st each year. Atascadero Girls Softball may reserve the two softball
fields at Traffic Way Park during their priority use period for other organizations such as
District level tournaments.
2. Year-around outfield mowing. Aeration, fertilizing and over-seeding when necessary.
3. Perimeter weeding and spraying of pre-emergent herbicide, including fence lines
4. Routine facility repairs to irrigation systems, bleachers, fencing,gates, etc. •
5. Empty Trash cans
6. Promote Atascadero Girls Softball annual sign-ups in the Atascadero Recreation Activity
Guide.
7. Allow Atascadero Girls Softball to place a storage building at Traffic Way Park in a
location determined by City staff.
8. Provide a list of organizations approved for facility use of the Traffic Way Park Softball
fields on Sundays during Atascadero Girls Softball's priority use period.
9. Allow Atascadero Girls Softball use of the Paloma Creek Park softball Fields, at no cost,
for the end of the season AGS All Star Tournament held annually the last weekend in May
or the first weekend in June. AGS is allowed use of the two softball fields and the on-site
concession stand(unless occupied by a City of Atascadero contracted concessionaire) on
Saturday and Sunday of the tournament weekend.
3. INDFMNIFICATION7
Atascadero Girls Softball hereby agrees to, and shall, hold City, its elective and appointive boards,
officers, agents and employees, harmless and shall defend the same from any liability for damage
or claims for damage, or suits or actions at law or in equity which may allegedly arise from
Atascadero Girls Softball or any of Atascadero Girls Softball's employees' or agents' negligent
operations or failure to perform under this agreement, whether such operations be by Atascadero
Girls Softball or by any one or more persons directly or indirectly employed by, or acting as agent
for, Atascadero Girls Softball. •
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ATASCADERO 2
AND ATASCADERO GIRLS SOFTBALL
4. INSURANCE
• Atascadero Girls Softball shall not commence its services under this agreement until they
have obtained all insurance required under this section and such insurance shall have been
approved by City as to form, amount and carrier:
a. Public Liability andProperty Damage Insurance Atascadero Girls Softball shall
take out and maintain during the life of this contract such public liability and
property damage insurance as shall protect City, its elective and appointive boards,
officers, agents and employees, and Contractor and any agents and employees
performing work covered by this contract from claims for damages for personal
injury, including death, as well as from claims for property damage which may arise
from Contractor's or any subcontractor's operations under this contract, whether
such operations be by Contractor or by anyone directly or indirectly employed by
contractor and the amounts of such insurance shall be as follows:
(1) Public LiabilitTlnsurance.
In an amount not less than $1,000,000-00 for injuries, including, but not limited to
death to any one person and, subject to the same limit for each person, in an amount
not less than$500,000-00 on account of any one occurrence;
(2) Property Damage Insurance_
In an amount of not less than $ 500,000.0(1 for damage to the property of each
person on account of any one occurrence.
• b. Proof of Insurance_
Atascadero Girls Softball shall furnish City, concurrently with the execution hereof,
with satisfactory proof of carriage of the insurance required, and adequate legal
assurance that each carrier will give City at least thirty(30) days'prior notice of the
cancellation of any policy during the effective period of this contract. The
certificate or policy of liability of insurance shall name City as an additional insured
with the Atascadero Girls Softball.
5. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT
5.01 TERMINATION OF NOTICE
Notwithstanding any other provision of this agreement, any party hereto may terminate this
agreement, at any time, without cause by giving at least M days prior written notice to the other
parties to this agreement.
5.02 TERMTNATTON ON OCCURRENCE OF STATED EVENTS- This agreement shall
terminate automatically on the occurrence of any of the following events:
(1) Bankruptcy or insolvency of any party;
(2) The end of the M days as set forth in Section 4.01;
(3) End of the contract to which Atascadero Girls Softball services were necessary; or
(4) Assignment of this agreement by Atascadero Girls Softball without the consent of
• the City.
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ATASCADERO 3
AND ATASCADERO GIRLS SOFTBALL
61015
5.03 TERMINATION BY ANY PARTY FOR T)FFATIT T•
Should any party default in the performance of this agreement or materially breach any of its
provisions, a non-breaching party, at their option, may terminate this agreement, immediately, by
giving written notice of termination to the breaching party. •
5.04. TERMINATION-
This agreement shall terminate on December 31, 2005, unless extended as set forth in this Section.
The City, with the agreement of the Atascadero Girls Softball, is authorized to extend the term of
this agreement beyond the termination date, as needed, under the same terms and conditions set
forth in this agreement. Any such extension shall be in writing and be an amendment to this
agreement.
6. NON-EMPLOYMENT STATUS.
It is understood and agreed by the parties hereto that Atascadero Girls Softball, while engaged in
operation of the program(s) described herein and complying with the terms of this agreement, is
and shall act as an independent contractor and is not an officer, agent or employee of the City, and
officers, employees and agents of Atascadero Girls Softball are not entitled to any of the benefits
of City employees.
7. ASSIGNMENT
Atascadero Girls Softball shall not assign this agreement or any part thereof without the prior
written consent of the City Administrator.
8. ALTERATIONS
8.01 Any alterations, additions, improvements or changes, that Atascadero Girls Softball may
desire to make to the premises, shall be made at the LESSEE's sole cost and expense and in
compliance with all applicable governmental requirements. All such alterations and/or
improvements shall be made only after first submitting the plans and specifications thereof to the
City and obtaining the consent of the City in writing. Any such alterations or improvements shall at
once become a part of the leased premises and, unless the City exercises its right to require the
LESSEE to remove any alterations that the LESSEE has made to the premises, shall be surrendered
to the City upon the expiration or sooner termination of the agreement.
8.02 If the City elects to exercise its right to terminate this agreement prior to the termination date
established here within, the City will reimburse Atascadero Girls Softball for all direct expenses of
materials related to approved alterations and improvements, not including labor costs or the value of
volunteer labor. Records and receipts shall be required for reimbursements.
•
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ATASCADERO 4
AND ATASCADERO GIRLS SOFTBALL
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date set forth
opposite their respective names.
• CITY OF ATASCADERO
Date:
WADE MCKINNEY, City Manager
ATASCADERO GIRLS SOFTBALL
Date:
President,Atascadero Girls Softball
ATTEST:
Date:
MARCIA TORGERSON, City Clerk
•
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
Date:
BRADY CHERRY, Director of Community Services
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Date:
ROY HANELY, City Attorney
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ATASCADERO 5
AND ATASCADERO GIRLS SOFTBALL
�6
ITEM NUMBER: A-6
DATE: 03/11/2003
SIN I ■
iaia I
19 79
• CADERp/
Atascadero City Council
Staff Report- Public Works Department
Final Map 2001-0006 (Tract 2415)
13000 Atascadero Road (TTM 2000-0004)
(Kelly Gearhart)
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Council:
1. Accept Final Parcel Map 2001-0006 (Tract 2415); and,
2. Authorize City Manager to execute Subdivision Improvement Agreement.
• DISCUSSION:
Tentative Tract Map 2000-0004 /Tract 2145 was approved by the City Council on April
10, 2001. The subdivision approved the division of a golf course driving range of 6.1
acres into four lots ranging in area from 1.5 to 1.6 acres.
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 66440 the approving legislative body
(City Council) cannot deny a final map that is consistent with an approved tentative map.
The legislative body is also required to accept, accept subject to improvement, or reject
on behalf of the public, any real property offered for dedication for public use in
conformity with the terms of the offer of dedication. No offers of dedication are made on
this map. Staff has determined that the Final Parcel Map is consistent with approved
Tentative Tract Map.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A: Final Map 2001-0006 (Tract 2415)
Exhibit B: Subdivision Improvement Agreement
•
Final Map 2001-0006 Page 1 of 2 �� ,
ITEM NUMBER: A-6
DATE: 03/11/2003
•
Exhibit A
Final Map 2001-0006(Tract 2415)
13000 Atascadero Road
Kelly Gearhart
.moi O
a
d e "_3 is
1
ti
•
Us WAVOY 101
i
Hul 3 1
� a
a
A
all
•
Final Map 2001-0006 Page 2 of 2
•
FOR RECORDER USE ONLY
RECORDING REQUESTED BY:
City of Atascadero
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
City Clerk
City of Atascadero
6500 Palma Avenue
Atascadero, CA. 93422
CITY OF ATASCADERO
SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
DATE OF AGREEMENT:
• NAME OF SUBDIVIDER: Kelly Gearhart
SUBDIVISION: Tract 2415 (Eagle Creek)
ESTIMATED TOTAL COST OF IMPROVEMENTS: $156,885
This Agreement made and entered into by and between the City of Atascadero, a municipal
corporation of the State of California (hereinafter referred to as "City") and Kelly Gearhart
(hereinafter referred to as "Subdivider").
RECITALS
A. Subdivider has presented to the City Council of the City of Atascadero Tract Map 2415 for
approval but not all of the improvements required or conditions imposed by Title 11,
Chapter 8 Articles 3 and 4 and Chapter 10 of the Atascadero Municipal Code have been
completed or performed.
B. Subdivider desires to record Tract Map 2415 after the same has been approved by the City
Council of the City of Atascadero.
C. The Subdivision Laws establish as a condition precedent to the approval of a parcel map
that Subdivider must have either completed, in compliance with City Standards, all of the
• improvements and land development work required by Tract Map 2415 or have entered
3/4/2003 Page 1 of 5
into a secured agreement with City to complete the improvements and land development
within a period of time specified by City. .
D. In consideration of approval of Tract Map 2415 by the City Council, Subdivider desires to
enter into this Agreement, whereby Subdivider promises to install and complete, at the
Subdivider's own expense, all of the public improvement work required by City in
connection with Subdivision.
E. Improvement Plans for the construction, installation and completion of the improvements
have been prepared by Subdivider and approved by the City Engineer. The Improvement
Plans for Tract Map 2415 are on file in the Office of the City Engineer and are incorporated
into this Agreement by this reference. All references in this Agreement to the Improvement
Plans shall include reference to any specifications for the improvements as approved by the
City Engineer.
F. An estimate of the cost for construction of the public improvements according to the
Improvement Plans has been made and has been approved by the City Engineer. The
Estimated Total Cost of Improvements is stated on Page 1 of this Agreement. The basis for
the estimate is attached as Exhibit "A" to this Agreement.
G. Subdivider recognizes that by approval of Tract Map 2415, City has conferred substantial
rights upon Subdivider, including the right to sell, lease, or finance lots within the
subdivision, and has taken the final act necessary to construct the public improvements
within the subdivision. As a result, City will be damaged to the extent of the cost of
installation of the improvements by Subdivider's failure to perform its obligations under this •
Agreement, including, but not limited to, Subdivider's obligation to commence construction
of the improvements by the time established in this Agreement. City shall be entitled to all
remedies available to it pursuant to this Agreement and law in event of a default by
Subdivider. It is specifically recognized that the determination of whether a reversion to
acreage or rescission of Tract Map 2415 constitutes an adequate remedy for default by the
Subdivider shall be within the sole discretion of City.
NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the provisions contained in the Atascadero Municipal Code, Title
11, Chapter 10, sections 11-10.010 through 11-10.022, and in consideration of the approval by the
City Council and the filing of Tract Map 2415, the parties hereto do promise and agree one with the
other as follows:
1. Subdivider is to make and complete all of the improvements for Tract Map 2415 as shown
on the Improvement Plans thereof and as required and set forth in Title 11, Chapter 8,
Articles 3 and 4, and Chapter 10, of the Atascadero Municipal Code, or as amended.
2. It is further understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto that the improvements
as required by the conditions of approval for Tract Map 2415 shall be completed within one
year from the Date of Agreement. These improvements include, but are not limited to the
following: those shown on the plans accepted by the City Engineer and on attached Exhibit
A.
3. The Subdivider promises and agrees to complete all improvement work referred to •
3/4/2003 Page 2 of 5
hereinabove to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
• 4. If said improvement work is not completed within one year of the Date of Agreement, the
g
Subdivider agrees that the City may elect to complete the same.
5. In the event the City elects to complete said work or improvement, the Subdivider agrees
that the City may exercise it's option to declare the bond or deposit, as hereinafter
described, forfeited and utilize the proceeds, including any interest, to complete said
improvements or that the City may complete said improvements and recover full cost and
expense thereof including reasonable attorney fees from the Subdivider and his/her surety.
6. The Subdivider shall, prior to submitting the map for filing, file an improvement security
with the City, in a form acceptable to the City Attorney, in the amount of the Estimated
Total Cost of Improvements, which is the amount deemed sufficient by the City Engineer.
In no case shall the improvement security be less than 100% of the Estimated Total Cost of
Improvements. Further, the Subdivider shall file a security for labor and materials in the
amount of the Estimated Total Cost of Improvements. The security for labor and materials
shall be no less than 50% of the Estimated Total Cost of Improvements. Periodic progress
payments may be authorized to the Subdivider as the improvements are completed if
adequate security remains as determined by the City Engineer, however, no such progress
payments shall be made for more than 90% of the value of any work. Progress payments
shall only be paid on work that is completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
7. The Subdivider hereby agrees that after the completion and acceptance of the
• improvements as specified in paragraphs 2 and 3, 10% of the improvement security shall be
retained for the guarantee and warranty of the work for a period of one year.
8. It is understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto that this Agreement shall
bind the heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns of the respective parties to
this agreement.
9. In the event legal action is taken to enforce the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing
party shall be entitled to recover costs to enforce the Agreement, including reasonable
attorney fees.
10. The Subdivider shall, defend, indemnify and save harmless the City, its officers, agents and
employees from any and all claims, demands, damages, costs, expenses, or liability
occasioned by the performance and attempted performance of the provisions hereof, or in
any way arising out of this Agreement,including, but not limited to, inverse condemnation,
equitable relief, or any wrongful act or any negligent act or omission to act on the part of
the Property Owner or of agents, employees, or independent contractors directly
responsible to the Property Owner, providing further that the foregoing shall apply to any
wrongful acts, or any actively or passively negligent acts or omissions to act, committed
jointly or concurrently by the Applicant, the Property Owner's agents, employees, or
independent contractors. Nothing contained in the foregoing indemnity provisions shall be
construed to require the Property Owner to indemnify the City against any responsibility or
liability in contravention of Section 2782 of the Civil Code.
• 3/4/2003 Page 3 of 5
642
11. Upon acceptance of the work on behalf of City and recordation of the Notice of
Completion, ownership of the improvements constructed pursuant to this Agreement shall •
vest in City.
12. Sale or other disposition of this property will not relieve Subdivider form the obligations set
forth herein. Subdivider agrees to notify City in writing at least 30 days in advance of any
actual or pending sale or other disposition of the property. If Subdivider sells the property
or any portion of the property within the Subdivision to any other person, Subdivider may
request a novation of this Agreement and a substitution of security. Upon approval of the
novation and substitution of securities, Subdivider may request a release or reduction of the
securities required by this Agreement. Nothing in the novation shall relieve the Subdivider
of the obligations under Paragraph 2 for the work or improvement done by Subdivider.
13. All notices required or provided for under this Agreement shall be in writing and delivered
in person or sent by mail, postage prepaid and addressed as provided in this section.
Notice shall be effective on the date it is delivered in person, or, if mailed, on the date of
deposit in the United States Mail. Notices shall be addressed as follows unless a written
change of address is filed with City:
City: City of Atascadero
6500 Palma Avenue
Atascadero, CA 93422
Subdivider: Kelly Gearhart
6205 Alcantara Ave •
Atascadero, CA 93422
Surety:
14. The provisions of this Agreement are severable. If any portion of this Agreement is held
invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of the Agreement shall remain in
full force and effect unless amended or modified by the mutual consent of the parties.
15. The Recitals to this Agreement are hereby incorporated into the terms of this Agreement.
16. This Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement of the parties with respect to the subject
matter. All modifications, amendments, or waivers of the terms of this Agreement must be
in writing and signed by the appropriate representatives of the parties. In the case of City,
the appropriate party shall be the City Manager.
3/4/2003 Page 4 of 5 •
0
• IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Property Owner has hereunto set his/her hand and the City has caused
these presents to be signed by its duly sworn and authorized officers the day and year first
hereinabove written.
CITY OF ATASCADERO SUBDIVIDER:
By:
(notarize signature)
Wade G. McKinney
City Manager
Attest:
Marcia M. Torgerson
City Clerk
Approved as to content:
Steven B. Kahn, P.E.
• City Engineer
Approved as to form:
Roy A Hanley
City Attorney
• 3/4/2003 Page 5 of 5
u424
EXHIBIT A
®_ RTC JOB NO.00.111 •
Esdmale Dabs:2&Feb03
7400 Morro Road Project Prindpae Russ Thompson
Atascaden3,Ca 93422 Project Manager:Ken Chacon
Ph(805)462-1375
fax(805)462-2124
TRACT 2415 Eagle Creek Subdivision
Opinion of Probable Construction Cost
Gearhart Development,Inc.
CONSTRUCTION OF ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
DEMOLITION AND EARTHWORK
1 Mobilization $ 2,000.00 1 LS $ 2.000.00
2 Clear and Grub $ 1,000.00 1 LS $ 11000.00
3 Cut $ 2.00 300CY $ 600.00
4 Fill $ 6.75 700 CY $ 4,725.00
DEMOLITION SUB TOTAL $ 8,325.00
TOTAL DEMOLITION AND EARTHWORK $ 8,325:00
SEWER
1 INONE 1$ - 01 EA 1$ -
SEWER SUB-TOTAL $ •
WATER
1 Connect to Existing Water System $ 500.00 1 EA $ 500.00
2 1.5"Domestic Service Lateral w/meter $ 750.00 4 EA $ 3.000.00
3 Fire Hydrant Assembly with Reflectors $ 1,850.00 1 EA $ 1,850.00
4 Water Line Testing&Sterilization $ 1,000.00 1 LS $ 1,000.00
5 8-Inch W/L C900 CL 150 $ 20.00 505 LF $ 10,100.00
6 Air Release Valve $ 800.00 1 EA $ 800.00
7 iBlow-offAssembly $ 750.00 1 1 LS $ 750.00
WATER SUB-TOTAL $ 1$,000,00
STORM DRAIN
1 INONE $ 11 EA 1$
STORM DRAIN SUB-TOTAL $
GAS,ELECTRIC,TELEPHONE&CABLE
1 lJoint Trench PG&E.Cable,Telephone,Gasj fS 20.001 2851 LF 1$ 5,700.00
2 ISmill Utility Boxes $ 300.001 41 EA 1$ 1,200.00
GAS,ELECTRIC,TELEPHONE,&CABLE SUB-TOTAL $ 6,900.00
EXHIBIT A
• _ RTC JOB NO.00.111 ,
® EstnoW Dam:25-Feb-03 ,
7400 MORD Road Project Principal:Ruas Thanvwn
Atascadero,Ca 93422 Project Manager.Ken Charon
Ph(805)462-1375
Fax(805)462-2124
Atascadero Road,Atascadero,Ca 93422
Opinion of Probable Construction Cost
Off-Site Road Improvements
CONSTRUCTION OF ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
TOTAL UNDERGROUND IMPROVEMENTS $ 24,900.00
CONCRETE
1 113ridge Footings 1$ 71500.001 11 LS 1$ 7,500.00
CONCRETE SUB-TOTAL $ 7,500.00
GRADING AND PAVING
1 lGrading&Roadway Su rade Preparation $ 2,000.00 1 LS $ 2,000.00
2 2.5'T 'W Asphalt Pavement $ 0.70 19300 SF $ 13,510.00
3 CL.II AB sed on 12-AB $ 47.00 715 Cy $ 33,605.00
4 AC Drive Approach $ 0.70 850 SF $ 595.00
5 AC Berm or Dike $ 3.00 330 LF $ 990.00
• GRADING AND PAVING SUB-TOTAL $ 50,700.00
SIGNING AND STRIPING
1 ITraffic Sign 1$ 200.001 11 LF $ 200.00
SIGNING&STRIPING SUBTOTAL $ 200.00
LANDSCAPING
1 INONE 1$ 01 SF $
LANDSCAPING SUB-TOTAL $ -
MISCELLANEOUS
1 Street Monuments $ 400.00 2 EA $ 800.00
3 Wood Barricade $ 500.00 1 EA $ 300.00
5 Hydroseed Slopes $ 1,000.00 1 LS $ 1,000.00
14 Erosion Control Measures $ 11000.00 1 LS $ 1,000.00
15 Bridge(including Walls $35,000.00 1 LS $ 35,000.00
MISCELLANEOUS SUB-TOTAL $ 38,300.00
TOTAL SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS $ 96,700.00
•
9
V 4 u
EXHIBIT A
•
®_ RTC NO.04111
Estimate
Oeta:25•feD-03
7400 Moffo Road Protect Prinelpal:Russ Thompson
Atascadero.Ca 93422 Project Manager:Ken Chacon
Ph(805)462-1375
Fax(8055)462-2124
Atascadero Road,Atascadero,Ca 93422
Opinion of Probable Construction Cost
Off-Site Road Improvements
CONSTRUCTION OF ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
.. . s. 2},p.,.Y'�i +:'..:is"r3� i`�'�.�4Y•._}�l ci V.. � r{
TOTAL $ 129,925.04
15%Contingency $ 19,488.75
SUBTOTAL $ 149,413.75
5%Field Engineering $ 7,470.69
TOTAL $ 156,884.44
•
GENERAL NOTES
1. This Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate is preliminary.It Is based upon the improvement
plans for(Eagle Creek-Tract 2415 prepared by R Thompson Consulting.
2. All costs are based upon current prices without the provision for inflation.
3. This estimate has been prepared as a guide as to the opinion of the probable eonstructbn costs
ardidpated for this project.R Thompson Consulting makes no warranty.either expressed or implied
Met the actual casts will not vary from the amounts indicated and assumes no liability for such
variances. Q�QFESSt �q
4. This estknate does not Include:
a.On site costs Including Building,Parking,and Utility Laterals.
b.Development and municipal fees. G�
c.Consulting and General Contrada fees.
ENO.C43069
EXP 3-32-04
Vkv
fiCrLEO��Q
•
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 03/11/2003
• 1918 ■ 18 9797
\ rAD 0
Atascadero City Council
Staff Report- Community Development Department
Zone Change 2000-0008, Master Plan of Development (CUP 2000-0024)
Vesting Tentative Tract Map 2001-0011
6340 Alcantara Avenue
(Lorraine Russell / Sholders Land Surveys)
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Planning Commission Recommends:
1. Adopt Resolution A,to certify the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration 2002-0049; and,
2. Introduce for first reading, by title only, Ordinance A approving Zone Change 2000-0008;
and,
3. Adopt Resolution B, approving Conditional Use Permit 2000-0024 for the Master Plan of
Development subject to findings and conditions of approval, amending the affordable
housing condition# 15 to a seven-year deed restriction; and,
4. Adopt Resolution C, approving Vesting Tentative Tract Map 2001-0011, subject to findings
and conditions of approval.
REPORT IN BRIEF:
The proposed project consists of an application for a Zone Change, Conditional Use Permit
(CUP) and Tentative Tract Map. The Zone Change request would establish a Planned
Development#7 overlay on the site subject to a master plan of development(CUP)that would
allow five (5) new single-family residences to be constructed in addition to the one (1)
existing single-family residence. The Tentative Tract Map would create a six (6) lot
subdivision. The project is subject to architectural and landscape standards. The project site
is a gently sloped with a seasonal creek traversing the site, with one existing single-family
house and numerous native oak and sycamore trees.
•
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 03/11/2003
Situation and Facts: •
1. Applicant/Representative: Lorraine Russell/Doug Sholders
6805 Los Gatos Road,Atascadero, CA 93422
2. Project Address: 6555 Atascadero Avenue, Atascadero, CA 93422
(San Luis Obispo County)APN 030-292-065
3. General Plan Designation: General Plan Designation: Medium-Density Residential (10
units/acre)
4. Zoning District: RMF-10 (Residential Multiple Family)
5. Site Area: 1.00 acre
6. Existing Use: Vacant Lot
7. Environmental Status: Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration 2002-0041
Planning Commission Hearing& Public Comment:
Planning Commission Hearing: This item was heard and recommended to the City Council by
the Planning Commission on January 21, 2003. The Planning Commission commented only on
the appropriateness of a condition of approval requiring that one unit be deed-restricted
affordable. The Commission voted unanimously to recommended that the project be approved
with condition number 15 amended to limit the affordable housing deed-restriction to a 7-year
time limit. However, staff is concerned that any limitation less than 10 years will not qualify the
unit as affordable per the State housing regulations.
Public Comment: After the Planning Commission hearing, staff met with a representative of
the 9-unit condominium complex located at the southern end of Tecorida (3 parcels to the
south of the project site). The following concerns were stated:
1. Not all of the condominium owners were notified of the public hearing.
Staff Comment: Only 2 owners are within 300-feet of the project site which required
notification by mail. Per the condominium owners request, all 9 condo owners have been
included on the City Council public hearing notification mailing which has also been updated
to reflect the latest County Assessor's information.
2. Tecorida is not wide enough to support additional traffic
Staff Comment: Tecorida has not been widened to a standard width to be sensitive to the
existing mature California Sycamore trees, which line both sides of the street. The road
•
U43
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 03/11/2003
• width is presentlyl8 feet, which is deemed adequate by the City Engineer to allow two lanes
of residential traffic with no on-street parking.
3. Tecorida requires nighttime illumination for pedestrian and vehicular safety.
Staff Comment: The City's General Plan Policy 1.4 (2) states, "Provide street lights only in
the Downtown, along El Camino Real, at major intersections, and locations where street
safety is of concern." According to the City Engineer, this road is similar to other non-
illuminated roads in Atascadero and no major safety concerns have been identified.
4. Tecorida requires sidewalk for pedestrian safety.
Staff Comment: There is not enough room between the property lines, road surface and the
Sycamore trees for a sidewalk. A sidewalk could be placed on the property frontage with the
granting of access easement, which has been added as a condition of approval (Condition
41).
S. Traffic travels too fast on Tecorida.
Staff Comment: Tecorida is currently not a through road. Staff has found no speeding
history record for this road.
i DISCUSSION:
Analysis of Planning Issues
1. Project Definition
The proposed project consists of five new single-family homes and retention of one existing
single-family home located on individual lots that will be developed under the requirements of
the PD-7 overlay district within the RMF-10 (Residential Multi-Family) zoning district. The
new homes will range in size from 1,519 to 2,033 square feet. The existing 1,250 square foot
home will remain in its present size and location.
Each home will have a two car attached garage with two additional uncovered spaces provided in
the driveway that fulfill the guest parking requirement. Each unit is consistent with the PD-7
requirement of providing a minimum 40%parcel landscaping and building footprints of less than
35% of the parcel area. A Master Plan of Development will cover all site development and
architectural design standards for the project. The Master Plan of Development will be approved
in the form of a Conditional Use Permit as required by the Zoning Ordinance. Any future
amendments to the Master Plan of Development can be made by the Planning Commission in the
future, independent of Council action.
•
ITEM NUMBER: B- 1
DATE: 03/11/2003
Project Summary Table •
Building Footprint 1744 sf 1872 sf 1238 sf 1560 sf 1560 sf 1229 sf
(not to exceed 35%) 21% 22% 20% 23% 20% 18%
Landscaped Area 5330 sf 6440 sf 4000 sf 3970 sf 4690 sf 4770 sf
(minimum 40%) 63% 76% 66% 59% 59% 71%
Covered Parking 2 spaces 2 spaces 2 spaces 2 spaces 2 spaces 2 spaces
Guest Parking 2 spaces 2 spaces 2 spaces 2 spaces 2 spaces 2 spaces
Floor Plan C existing A B B Reverse D
Lower Living Area 1304 sf, 1250 sf, 798 sf 1119 sf 1119 sf 789 sf
Upper Living Area 566 sf I nonel 916 sf 1 914 sf 914 sf 730 sf
Garage 440 sf 440 sf 440 sf 440 sf 440 sf 440 sf
2. Background
Surrounding Land Use and Setting:
: . North: Commercial
South: Residential
East: Residential
West: Residential
•
General Plan and Zoning Ordinance identifies this site, along with adjacent properties to the
south, east and west as Medium-Density Residential with a density of up to 10 units per acre.
The Multi-family residential zoning is consistent with the General Plan. The General Plan and
zoning incorporates factors such as slope, native trees, creeks, circulation, building coverage and
landscape development standards that could reduce the density accordingly. The zoning
ordinance allows the establishment of a Planned Development Overlay No. 7 (PD-7) in the
multi-family zone which requires a minimum of four single-family units, consistent with the PD-
7 site development standards and appearance review, as analyzed within this report.
The PD-7 requires a Master Plan of Development which incorporates site development standards
and appearance review including architecture and landscaping. Per the zoning ordinance, the
Master Plan of Development is processed as a Conditional Use Permit.
3. Design and Appearance
Architecture,Materials, Color
The applicant has worked closely with staff in designing the homes with special architectural
features, upgraded building materials, compatible colors, and landscape design. In addition, staff
has added conditions of approval consistent with General Plan & Zoning requirements, as •
identified below.
U J i
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 03/11/2003
• The project has been designed with two-story residential units that incorporate architectural
themes and materials compatible with more traditional Atascadero colony neighborhoods. Each
home has been individually designed with its own contemporary style, color, and material
palette. As conditioned, all front elevations and side elevations visible from Tecorida Avenue
will have additional architectural detailing with a masonry wainscot treatment at the base
(Condition 6.a). A variety of architectural embellishments will be incorporated into the different
new house designs, including: Covered entry porches (Condition 6.b), double or single hung
windows, transom windows, window shutters (Condition 6.c), architectural banding, decorative
gable vents, and heavy tile roofing materials. A separate color scheme is proposed for each new
house. All trash storage, recycle storage, and air conditioning units will be screened from view
behind fenced or landscaped enclosures. The site landscaping plan includes a variety of native
and accent trees. All front yards and areas between Tecorida Avenue and lots 1 and 6 shall be
landscaped by the developer (Condition 10). Back yards will be landscaped by the individual
property owners. All landscape maintenance will be the responsibility of the individual property
owner.
Front Elevations of Each New House
Note: Conditions 6a—6d will enhance the exterior appearance of each new home depicted below.
• o
- n o
o�oc� o000
® fl
noE=M= moon
c�000 �000 m m
The applicant has included a color and material sample board for each house plan. Refer to
Exhibit G for details. Staff has included a condition that the garage doors be de-emphasized by
painting to match the building body(Condition 6d).
Landscape Design
The preliminary landscape plan has been designed for compatibility with the surrounding
neighborhood and visual appearance from Tecorida Avenue. The plans identify landscaping
thoughout the site with the exception of rear yards. The landscape plan and palette meets the
PD-7 requirements. Refer to Native Tree Mitigation/Preservation section for additional tree
planting information.
Due to the on-site topography and tree preservation requirements, the use of retaining walls
within front yards is required. A condition of approval has been included to design such walls to
match or compliment the texture and color of the primary residence. In addition, the retaining
wall located within the front yard of lots 3 and 4 shall be rounded or angled back toward lot 4
• (Condition 12).
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 03/11/2003
Site Plan, Circulation, Parking •
The site plan has been proposed to meet the requirements of the Atascadero Municipal Code and
the appearance review requirements of the General Plan. The project will include street frontage
improvements along Alcantara Avenue. As a result of potential impacts to the on-site seasonal
creek, the project includes a bridge that will span the creek to avoid any environmental impacts.
In addition, the bridge and access road include special design elements including special porous
paving and pegged curbs to reduce the impacts to existing native trees with the added benefit of
improving the project appearance (Mitigation Measures 4.e.1 and 4.e.2).
On-site circulation has been designed to allow reciprocal access between the adjacent westerly
property(Condition 13).
The proposed project exceeds the code-required parking spaces.
Site Drainage
The site slopes gently toward the on-site seasonal creek. Drainage has been designed to disperse
through the site without concentrating flows into any particular location. On-site storm water
retention is not required.
Wastewater
Sanitary sewer will be connected to the Tecorida Avenue sewer line.
4. Native Tree Mitigation/Preservation
The site contains numerous native oaks trees. The project has been designed to preserve a
majority of the largest trees. There are 64 small under story oak trees proposed for removal. A
condition of approval has been included requiring the five front yard trees be 24-inch box native
trees, and the five trees along Tecorida Avenue and four additional 15-gallon native sycamore
trees be planted between the creek and the private driveway between lot 4 and 5 (Condition 10).
The tree mitigation and tree fund payment is summarized below.
•
`53
ITEM NUMBER: B- 1
DATE: 03/11/2003
• Evergreen Native Trees(inches) Deciduous Native Trees(inches) Totals
dbh notes dbh notes
1 1 244-inches white oak
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6
7
6 8
Total 0-inches Total 244-inches 244-inches
Mitigation Requirement
req'd tree replacements: 0 five gal trees req'd tree replacements: 81 five gal trees 81 five gal trees
Proposed Replanting 0 five gal trees Proposed Replanting 9 five gal trees 9 five gal trees
0 box trees(24") 5 box trees(24") 5 box trees(24")
Remaining Mitigation 0 five gal trees Remaining Mitigation 62 five gal trees 62 five gal trees
or or
Tree Fund Payment: $ - Tree Fund Payment: $ 3,116.67 $ 3,116.67
Native tree protection and a preservation plan is included for trees proposed for retention. Prior
to permit issuance, a Tree Protection Plan shall be prepared for the project by a certified arborist
and approved by Planning Services. Tree protection shall be in place prior to the issuance of any
construction permits and the arborist shall be under contract to monitor tree protection. For
native trees being removed, the mitigation measures require $3,116.67 be paid into the City's
native tree mitigation account and additional native trees be planted on site. Refer to Condition
10 and Mitigation Measure 4.e.1.
5. On-Site Creek
A seasonal creek traverses the project site. The project has been designed to avoid all significant
impacts through building setbacks, landscaping, and a project entrance that will bridge the creek
and avoid disturbance within the ordinary high-flow line of the creek bank. The project has been
designed to avoid concentrating storm water runoff into any one location. In addition,
landscaping has been included for all front yards and areas adjacent to the creek to filter any
sediment or pollutant concentrations prior to reaching the creek. The project landscape plan
includes additional native planting along the creek bank. This will protect both the water quality
of the creek and minimize the potential for creek bed erosion.
The project site is not identified as a flood hazard on the FEMA maps. The project is designed
so that all units will be constructed several feet above the creek's high water flow. The units
along the creek have been adequately set back to avoid any grading of the upper creek bank.
•
ViJL�
ITEM NUMBER: B- 1
DATE: 03/11/2003
6. Project Benefits •
One of the required findings for approval of a planned development rezone is that the project
must "offer certain redeeming features to compensate for the requested modification." Due to
the site's limited area, no room is available for common recreational facilities or significant
landscape planting. However, the project will have a number of "redeeming features" which
include the following: 1) no disturbance to the on-site seasonal creek; 2) each unit will have a
private yard area that will allow for outdoor recreational opportunities, 3) architectural and
landscape features of the project have been designed to enhance the project's appearance and
benefit the surrounding neighborhood; (4) much of the paved private driveway will incorporate
special paving treatment, and 5) the project will provide one moderate deed-restricted affordable
housing unit as identified below.
Affordable Housing
The City's General Plan anticipates implementation of an affordable housing program (General
Plan Policy 2.2) which a program to include a fixed percentage of units within residential and
commercial developments to be reserved as deed restricted affordable units or a in-lie fee to be
collected. Although inclusionary housing has not yet been implemented, staff is recommending
that one of the proposed residential units be a deed-restricted affordable unit in the moderate
category. A condition of approval has been added to this effect(Condition 15).
7. Tentative Tract Map
A six-lot tract map is proposed as part of the project consistent with the Master Plan of •
Development. The tract map has been conditioned by staff and the City Engineer to meet all
City standards including street frontage improvements. The applicant will be required to record
CC&R's for the map that will include maintenance and access of common areas (TTM Condition
5).
8. Master Plan of Development(Conditional Use Permit)
As previously mentioned, a Master Plan of Development is required for the PF-7, to be approved
through the Conditional Use Permit process. The Conditional Use Permit process provides the
opportunity for the public and the Planning Commission to review the specifics of land use
proposals, such as architectural design, site design, landscape, signage, and specific standards of
the zoning ordinance. The Planning Commission must make the following five findings to
approve a Conditional Use Permit:
1. The proposed project or use is consistent with the General Plan and the City's Appearance
Review Manual.
Staff Comment: The use is consistent with the Multi-Family Residential designation of the
Plan and General Plan Land Use Element Policy 1.1 and Housing Element Policy 4.3.
2. The proposed project or use satisfies all applicable provisions of the Title (Zoning
Ordinance) including the PD-7 Ordinance. •
vJJ
ITEM NUMBER: B- 1
DATE: 03/11/2003
• Staff Comment: As conditioned,the project satisfies all PD-7 zoning code provisions.
3. The establishment, and subsequent operation or conduct of the use will not, because of the
circumstances and conditions applied in the particular case, be detrimental to the health,
safety, or welfare of the general public or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of
the use, or be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity of the use.
Staff Comment: The proposed residential project will not be detrimental to the general
public or working persons health, safety, or welfare.
4. That the proposed project or use will not be inconsistent with the character or the immediate
neighborhood or contrary to its orderly development.
Staff Comment: Conditions of approval have been added so that the proposed project will
not be inconsistent with the existing or future commercial neighborhood character.
5. That the proposed use or project will not generate a volume of traffic beyond the safe
capacity of all roads providing access to the project, either existing or to be improved in
conjunction with the project, or beyond the normal traffic volume of the surrounding
neighborhood that would result from full development in accordance with the Land Use
Element.
• Staff Comment: The proposed building and use are consistent with the traffic projections
and road improvements anticipated within the General Plan.
Based on staff's analysis in the preceding sections, it appears that all of the required findings for
approval of a Master Plan of Development(Conditional Use Permit) can be made.
9. General Plan Consistency
The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Element Policy 1.1:
"Preserve the rural atmosphere of the community and assure "elbow room" in areas designed for
lower density development by guiding new development into the Urban Core to conform to the
historic Colony land use patterns of the City and to respect the natural environment, hillside area
and existing neighborhoods", and General Plan Housing Element Policy 4.3: "Encourage
attractive architecture and site landscaping that respect terrain and native trees". Implementing
General Plan programs require appearance review of architectural design, materials, street trees,
and landscaping to maintain the retain the rural atmosphere and protect the environment, and
incorporate architectural themes into the site and building design. As analyzed above, the
proposed project, as conditioned is consistent with the General Plan.
In staff's opinion the project is consistent with the goals and policies of the Land Use Element
and the Housing Element, with the inclusion of one affordable moderate-income unit. The
. project will provide small lot, single-family dwellings that fulfill an important housing need
within the community. As conditioned, the project incorporates architectural and landscape
656
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 03/11/2003
elements that are consistent with the scale and character of the surrounding neighborhood and the •
General Plan's appearance review requirement.
10. Proposed Environmental Determination
Staff has prepared an initial study for the project in conformance with the California
Environmental Quality Act. Based on the findings of the initial study, staff determined that the
project does not have the potential to create any significant environmental impacts when
mitigation measures are incorporated. A proposed mitigated negative declaration has been
prepared and posted for the project.
Staff is recommending the Commission recommend that the City Council certify Proposed
Mitigated Negative Declaration 2002-0049.
Conclusion The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and Atascadero Municipal
Code, as analyzed within this staff report. The applicant has proposed design modifications and
agrees with all mitigation measures and conditions of approval. It is staff s opinion that the
proposed project, as conditioned allows the Planning Commission to make all of the required
findings for project approval recommendation to the City Council.
FISCAL IMPACT: The project would likely have a slight negative impact on City
revenues. As a general rule, single-family dwellings require services that exceed the revenue •
generated by the dwelling.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. The City Council may approve the project subject to additional or revised project conditions.
The Council's motion to approve needs to include any new or revised project conditions.
2. The Council may deny the project.
3. The Council may continue the hearing and refer the item back to staff for additional
information or analysis. Direction should be given to staff and the applicant on required
information.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1: Location Map (General Plan& Zoning)
Attachment 2: Draft Planning Commission Minutes
Attachment 3: Draft Resolution A- Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration
Attachment 4: Draft Ordinance A-Proposed Zoning Map Change
Attachment 5: Draft Resolution B -Proposed Master Plan of Development •
Attachment 6: Draft Resolution C—Proposed Vesting Tentative Tract Map
- i1J�
ITEM NUMBER: B- 1
DATE: 03/11/2003
• Attachment 1: Location Map, General Plan and Zoning
General Plan: -
Medium-Density
Residential (10
units/acre)
a
Zoning District:
RMF-10 (Residential
Multiple Family)
Project
Site
-9
4
f
� Y A
1 M
a �
ya ,,
i
m �J
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 03/11/2003
ATTACHMENT 2: Planning Commission Minutes •
cats ■ is�e
CADF.�/
CITY OFATASCADERO
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
Rezular Meeting
January 21,2003—7:00 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER
Chairperson Bentz called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. and Vice Chairperson Fonzi led the
Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL
Present: Commissioners Eddings, Jones, Kelley, Porter, Fonzi and Chairperson Bentz
Absent: None
Staff: Community Development Director Warren Frace, City Engineer Steve Kahn,
Associate Planner Glenn Rider, Planning Services Manager Steve McHarris, City
Attorney Roy Hanley and Recording Secretary Grace Pucci.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Joan O'Keefe, 9985 Old Morro Road East,referred to two questions she had posed at the last
Commission meeting and stated that she had never received an answer to either one. She hoped
this was an oversight and asked to have her questions answered in the future. Mrs. O'Keefe also
commented on an article in the Atascadero News last week regarding the Commission's decision
on the 3F Meadows project. She felt there were inaccuracies in the article and felt the paper
should correct the mistakes. Additionally, Mrs. O'Keefe referred to a question asked by •
v�9
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 03/11/2003
• Chairperson Bentz to Dean Coker regarding release of information as requested by the Planning
Department, and felt the staff should have been asked the same question.
Chairperson Bentz closed the Public Comment period.
COMMUNITYDEVELOPMENT STAFFREPORTS
Chairman Bentz asked for Commission agreement to move Item#l, the presentation on the
Brown Act, to the end of the agenda. There was Commission consensus to do so.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF THE REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION
MEETING ON JANUARY 7,2003.
MOTION: By Commissioner Kelley and seconded by Commissioner Eddings to approve the
Consent Calendar.
AYES: Commissioners Kelley, Eddings, Jones, Porter and Chairperson Bentz
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: Vice Chairperson Fonzi
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote.
2. APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION 2003-0002 TO DENY CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT 2002-0055 TO ESTABLISHMENT OF A BED AND BREAKFAST AT
7129 SAN GREGORIO RD.
Community Development Director Warren Frace explained that the Resolution of Denial is
being brought back for the Commission's approval.
MOTION: By Commissioner Jones and seconded by Commissioner Eddings to deny the
Conditional Use Permit application 2002-0055 with the findings as set forth in the
staff report and approving Resolution 2003-0002.
AYES: Commissioners Jones, Eddings, Kelley,Porter and Chairperson Bentz
NOES: None
. ABSTAIN: Vice Chairperson Fonzi
06
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 03/11/2003
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. •
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Chairman Bentz announced that Public Hearing Item #3 would be continued to an
unspecified date.
3. RECONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 89-008
Applicant: Atascadero Christian Home, 8455 Santa Rosa,Atascadero, CA
Project Title: Senior Assisted-Living Facility Site Plan Amendment
Project Location: 8455 Santa Rosa Road,Atascadero, CA 93422
(San Luis Obispo County)APN 056-301-039
Project Hearing to reconsider the original Conditional Use Permit#89-008, amending
Description: the existing phased site plan at an senior assisted-care living facility in
Atascadero. The proposal includes relocation of 19 multi unit cottages, access
roads, grading and landscaping.. The proposed changes would be within the
existing 15.25-acre development. The project is located on the north side of
Santa Rosa Road approximately '/4 mile west of U.S. Highway 101. The
project will require the removal of several native trees. The proposed building •
sites are slightly sloped and occur in a semi-rural primary grassland setting
within a single-family residential vicinity. The project will gain access from
an existing driveway to Santa Rosa Road.
General Plan Designation: Single Family Residential
Zoning District: Residential Single Family-Y 1.0 acre minimum lot size)
Proposed PROPOSED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION 2002-0052:
Environmental Based on the findings of the initial study, the Community Development
Determination Department recommends that the Planning Commission find that no
significant harm would come to the environment from approval of this
project. The proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration is available for public
review at 6500 Palma Avenue, Community Development Department, Room
104, from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday
Staff Adoption of Planning Commission Resolution 2003-0007 approving the
Recommendation reconsideration of Conditional Use Permit 89-008 subject to findings and
conditions of approval.
•
UU1
ITEM NUMBER: B- 1
DATE: 03/11/2003
•
4. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2001-0043:
Applicant: Michael Frederick, P.O. Box 573, Atascadero, CA 93423
Project Title: Proposed Mini-Storage Center
Project Location: 2850 El Camino Real, Atascadero, CA 93422
(San Luis Obispo County)APN 049-201-021
Project An application to construct 30,250 square feet of commercial storage
Description: buildings designed for mini-storage use, 2,450 square feet of commercial
office buildings, a parking lot and landscaping on a 1.5-acre vacant lot of
record. The proposed project will require grading quantities of
approximately 175 cubic yards of cut and 3025 cubic yards of fill. The
project will require the removal of two native trees. The proposed building
site will pave a majority of the lot area which is gently sloped and occurs
as an infill project within a developed industrial area in the City of
Atascadero. The project will gain access from El Camino Real and be
visible from U.S Highway 101.
• General Plan Designation: General Commercial
Zoning District: Commercial Park
Proposed PROPOSED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION 2002-0040:
Environmental Based on the findings of the initial study, the Community Development
Determination Department recommends that the Planning Commission find that no
significant harm would come to the environment from approval of this
project. The proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration is available for public
review at 6500 Palma Avenue, Community Development Department, Room
104, from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday
Staff Adoption of Planning Commission Resolution 2003-0008 approving
Recommendation Conditional Use Permit 2001-0043 subject to findings and conditions of
approval.
Associate Planner Glenn Rider provided the staff report and answered questions of the
Commission.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Michael Frederick, applicant, answered several questions raised by the Commission and
expressed his concern regarding Condition of Approval #13 requiring the installation of a fire
hydrant.
•
� 2
F
V
ITEM NUMBER: B- 1
DATE: 03/11/2003
Director Frace responded to Mr. Frederick's concern by stating that the condition came from the •
Fire Department, which did not want to be forced to lay a fire hose across El Camino Real in the
event of a fire, an action that would result in shutting down the entire street.
Mr. Frederick answered questions of the Commission.
Joe Elkins, architect, 370 Wilhoit, Templeton, further discussed the applicant's concern
regarding Condition of Approval #13. Mr. Elkins answered questions of the Commission.
Patty Jones, 1295 Nacimiento Lake Drive, Paso Robles, stated she owns Stow-It Mini Storage
and their occupancy is down 20% and has been for over a year. She said a new 35,000 square
foot facility is going in right next to hers.
Steve Gray indicated he manages the Downtown Mini Storage at 9200 El Camino Real, and was
in agreement with the previous speaker. His facility is approaching the 20% vacancy rate and
the new facility next to Ms. Jones has not even opened yet. He felt it would be tough to fill all
his units with another facility in town.
Chairperson Bentz closed the Public Comment period.
Commissioner Kelley felt that because the entire facility has sprinklers and there is a hydrant
directly across the street, the installation of a fire hydrant by the applicant is not necessary. He
felt the applicant has met his requirements for fire prevention on the project without the addition
of the hydrant. •
Commissioner Eddings supported Commissioner Kelley's remarks and stated he did not feel a
dumpster is appropriate for the site because it will be constantly full from renter's trash and
would end up being a problem for the applicant.
Chairperson Bentz inquired of staff if the Uniform Fire Code requires the hydrant. Director
Frace stated that the Uniform Fire Code applies to the spacing of hydrants, and the Commission
would not have the flexibility of deviating from that, however this hydrant does not pose a
spacing issue but rather to assist in fighting a fire. For this reason, the Commission would have
some discretion on that.
MOTION: By Commissioner Kelley and seconded by Commissioner Eddings to adopt
Planning Commission Resolution 2003-0008, the Commercial Center Conditional
Use Permit 2001-0043, an application to construct a mini- storage facility
consisting of 30,250 square-feet of storage building, a 2,450 square-feet and 1,550
square-foot commercial office building, parking lot, utilities, and landscaping on
one vacant lot of record in the Commercial park zoning district with the
elimination of Condition of Approval No. 13 regarding the fire hydrant.
Vice Chairperson Fonzi expressed her concern that though she supports the applicant's right to
build the facility, she wonders if it will sit vacant and become blighted given that the other mini-
storage facilities in the area are underutilized. .
- � G,3
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 03/11/2003
• Commissioner Eddings reiterated his position that he does not feel it is the Commission's job to
regulate enterprise, the market place will decide who stays and who goes.
Commissioner Jones stated he has a problem with the fire hydrant issue. He would like
clarification on the safety issue and would like to hear the reasons behind the condition before he
would vote on it.
MOTION: By Commissioner Kelley and seconded by Commissioner Eddings to adopt
Planning Commission Resolution 2003-0008, the Commercial Center Conditional
Use Permit 2001-0043, an application to construct a mini-storage facility
consisting of 30,250 square-feet of storage building, a 2,450 square-feet and 1,550
square-feet commercial office building, parking lot, utilities, and landscaping on
one vacant lot of record in the Commercial park zoning district with the
elimination of Condition of Approval No. 13 regarding the fire hydrant.
AYES: Commissioners Kelley, Eddings, Porter and Chairperson Bentz
NOES: Commissioners Jones and Fonzi
ABSTAIN: None
. Motion passed 4:2 by a roll-call vote.
5. (CONDOMINIUM) TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2002-0022:
Applicant: Jim Shores, 6700 El Camino Real,Atascadero, CA 93422
Project Title: Proposed 3-Building Industrial Condominium Tract Map
Project Location: 4105 Traffic Way&Various Sequential Addresses
Project An application for a Condominium Airspace Tentative Tract Map to
Description: provide for separate ownership of four individual suites in each of three
separate existing industrial buildings on three separate lots of record.
Grading and construction are not required. The project will requires a
common agreement for the maintenance of each building, and each
parking and landscape area. The project is within a developed industrial
area located on the east side of Traffic Way approximately 100 yards north
of San Jacinto Street in the City Of Atascadero. The parcels will gain
access directly from Traffic Way.
General Plan Designation: Industrial
Zoning District: Industrial
Proposed CEQA Exemption by Statute Section 15.301. Class I- Existing Facilities. (k)
Environmental Division of existing multiple family or single-family residences into
• Determination common-interest ownership and subdivision of existing commercial or
�• A
- V CJ `fit
ITEM NUMBER: B- 1
DATE: 03/11/2003
industrial buildings, where no physical changes occur which are not •
otherwise exempt.
Staff Adopt Resolution No. PC 2003-0011, recommending approval of Tentative
Recommendation Tract Map 2001-0012 to the City Council subject to findings and conditions
of approval.
Chairperson Bentz announced that Commissioner Jones would be stepping down from
consideration of this item.
Associate Planner Glenn Rider provided the staff report and answered questions of the
Commission.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Ken Wilson, Wilson Land Surveys, applicant's representative, stated that Condition No. 7 should
be removed, as it does not apply according to the ordinance. Mr. Wilson stated that this is a
good project that will improve this area of Traffic Way. He indicated that there is an opportunity
for the applicant to pick up some property from the railroad at the north end of the project and
questioned whether in the CC&R's that area could be either excluded or as an option used for
future development.
Community Development Director Frace stated that staff is aware of the applicant's interest in
expanding the industrial park by acquiring additional land from the railroad. At this point this .
has not been applied for and is not an active permit, therefore staff recommends removing it
from the map; the applicant can file another map in the future, amend the CC&R's and add
whatever additional lease spaces would be created at that time.
Chairperson Bentz closed the Public Comment period.
MOTION: By Vice Chairperson Fonzi and seconded by Commissioner Porter to adopt
Resolution No. PC 2003-0011 certifying the Proposed Mitigated Negative
Declaration and approving Tentative Tract Map 2002-0022, a request to create 13
condominiums suites across three lots of record based on exhibits, findings and
subject to conditions with the removal of Condition No. 7 and removal of the
lease site from the map.
AYES: Commissioners Fonzi, Porter, Kelley, Eddings and Chairperson Bentz
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: Commissioner Jones
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote.
•
UUJ
ITEM NUMBER: B- 1
DATE: 03/11/2003
• 6. SINGLE FAMILY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONE CHANGE 2000-0008
MASTER PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT (CUP 2000-0024), VESTING TENTATIVE
TRACT MAP 2001-0011:
Applicant: Lorraine Russell/Doug Sholders
6805 Los Gatos Road, Atascadero, CA 93422
Project Title: 6340 Alcantara Avenue Single Family Planned Development, Zone Change
2000-0008, Master Plan of Development (CUP 2000-0024), Vesting
Tentative Tract Map 2001-0011
Project Location: 6340 Atascadero Avenue, Atascadero, CA 93422
(San Luis Obispo County)APN 030-292-065
Project An application for a Zone Change, Conditional Use Permit (CUP) and
Description: Tentative Tract Map. The Zone Change request would establish a Planned
Development #7 overlay on the site subject to a master plan of development
(CUP) that would allow five (5) new single-family residences to be
constructed in addition to the one (1) existing single-family residence. The
Tentative Tract Map would create a six (6) lot subdivision.
Environmental PROPOSED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION 2002-0049:
Determination Based on the findings of the initial study, the Community Development
Department recommends that the Planning Commission find that no
significant harm would come to the environment from approval of this
• project. The proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration is available for public
review at 6500 Palma Avenue, Community Development Department, Room
104, from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Staff 1. Adopt Resolution No. PC 2003-0003 recommending that the City
Recommendation Council certify Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration 2002-0049;
and,
2. Adopt Resolution No. PC 2003-0004 recommending that the City
Council introduce an ordinance for first reading to approve Zone Change
2000-0008 based on findings; and,
3. Adopt Resolution No. PC 2003-0005 recommending that the City
Council approve the Master Plan of Development (CUP 2000-0024)
based on findings and subject to Conditions of Approval and Mitigation
Monitoring; and,
4. Adopt Resolution No. PC 2003-0006 recommending the City Council
approve Vesting Tentative Tract Map 2001-0011, based on findings and
subject to Conditions of Approval and Mitigation Monitoring.
•
- vC1�
ITEM NUMBER: B- 1
DATE: 03/11/2003
Planning Services Manager Steve McHarris provided the staff report and answered questions of •
the Commission.
Commissioner Kelley stated for the record that he is for affordable and inclusionary housing. He
expressed concern regarding the amount of money the applicant will invest in the deed restricted
unit versus what she will be permitted to sell it for, in addition to which she has not received a
density bonus. City Attorney Hanley explained the process for setting a price for the deed-
restricted unit. Commissioner Kelley also felt that 10 years was too long a period of time for the
deed restriction.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Douglas Sholders, 6805 Los Gatos Road, applicant's representative, gave a brief history of the
project and explained the decorative features of the site. Mr. Sholders asked if there is a size
requirement for the affordable deed restricted unit. He stated that he would prefer to not have a
deed-restricted unit on the property, however he does not wish to jeopardize the project by not
providing one.
Director Frace explained there were no size limitations, but the sales price will be based on the
family size, which is calculated by the number of bedrooms in the unit.
Joan O'Keefe, 9985 Old Morro Road East, thanked staff for the detailed presentation on the tree
protection for this site. She is glad affordable housing is being addressed in this project; this is a
positive move and will start the process for future developments. Mrs. O'Keefe stated that she •
sees trees in decline in projects completed four to five years ago because of intrusion into the
drip line. She feels it is time to consider bonding for areas where there is a possibility that trees
may not survive.
Chairperson Bentz closed the Public Comment period.
There was Commission discussion regarding the time limit on the deed-restricted unit.
MOTION: By Commissioner Jones to adopt Resolution No. PC 2003-0003 recommending
that the City Council certify Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration 2002-0049,
and adopt Resolution No. PC 2003-0004 recommending that the City Council
introduce an ordinance for first reading to approve Zone Change 2000-0008 based
on the findings set forth in the staff report, and adopt Resolution No. PC 2003-
0005 recommending that the City Council approve the Master Plan of
Development (CUP 2000-0024) based on findings and subject to Conditions of
Approval and Mitigation Monitoring as set forth in the staff report, and adopt
Resolution No. PC 2003-0006 recommending the City Council approve Vesting
Tentative Tract Map 2001-0011, based on findings and subject to Conditions of
Approval and Mitigation Monitoring and within that, the deed-restricted unit be
for 10 years.
Motion failed for lack of a second.
ITEM NUMBER: B- 1
DATE: 03/11/2003
• MOTION: By Commissioner Kelley and seconded by Vice Chairperson Fonzi to adopt
Resolution No. PC 2003-0003 recommending that the City Council certify
Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration 2002-0049, and adopt Resolution No.
PC 2003-0004 recommending that the City Council introduce an ordinance for
first reading to approve Zone Change 2000-0008 based on the findings set forth in
the staff report, and adopt Resolution No. PC 2003-0005 recommending that the
City Council approve the Master Plan of Development (CUP 2000-0024) based
on findings and subject to Conditions of Approval and Mitigation Monitoring as
set forth in the staff report, and adopt Resolution No. PC 2003-0006
recommending the City Council approve Vesting Tentative Tract Map 2001-0011,
based on findings and subject to Conditions of Approval and Mitigation
Monitoring, and adjusting Item No. 15 to read five years for the deed-restriction.
There was further Commission discussion regarding the time limit for the deed-restricted unit.
Points made included:
1. This is the first step toward moderate income housing in the City and therefore the
Commission shouldn't be shortchanging its life.
2. The issue of providing moderate-income housing is premature and there are no
guidelines in place to follow.
3. The ten-year limit would be the best option if it was enforceable, but due to housing
• turnover within the City, monitoring will be difficult.
4. The ten-year limit may be the best, as it would allow for more than one family to take
advantage of the deed restriction.
5. There is no structure to the program at this time and the issue of who will benefit from
the equity is unclear.
Chairperson Bentz reopened the Public Comment period
Ann Quinn, 7200 Toro Creek Road, suggested that equity would be accrued to the owner of the
deed-restricted unit, as a greater percentage of their income will not be needed for housing and
can go into savings.
Chairperson Bentz closed the Public Comment period.
A seven-year time limit was suggested as a compromise and the maker of the Motion and the
second agreed to the change.
MOTION: By Commissioner Kelley and seconded by Vice Chairperson Fonzi to adopt
Resolution No. PC 2003-0003 recommending that the City Council certify
Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration 2002-0049, and adopt Resolution No.
PC 2003-0004 recommending that the City Council introduce an ordinance for
first reading to approve Zone Change 2000-0008 based on the findings set forth in
the staff report, and adopt Resolution No. PC 2003-0005 recommending that the
• City Council approve the Master Plan of Development (CUP 2000-0024) based
U
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 03/11/2003
on findings and subject to Conditions of Approval and Mitigation Monitoring as •
set forth in the staff report, and adopt Resolution No. PC 2003-0006
recommending the City Council approve Vesting Tentative Tract Map 2001-0011,
based on findings and subject to Conditions of Approval and Mitigation
Monitoring, and adjusting Item No. 15 to read seven years for the deed-
restriction.
AYES: Commissioners Kelley, Fonzi, Porter, Eddings, Jones and Chairperson Bentz
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
Motion passed 6.0 by a roll-call vote.
COMMISSIONER COMMENTS&REPORTS
7. REQUEST FROM COMMISSIONER BENTZ TO REAGENDIZE 3F MEADOWS
MASTER PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT
3-F MEADOWS / PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 11 MASTER PLAN OF
DEVELOPMENT DETERMINATION (CASTLEROCK DEVELOPMENT)
Applicant: Castlerock Development, a CH Corporation, 202 H3 Tank Farm Road, San
Luis Obispo, CA 93401
Project Title: 3-F Meadows / Planned Development 11 Master Plan of Development
Determination
Project Oak Ridge Estates at 3F Meadows
Location: 812 acres located west of the end of San Marcos Road
(San Luis Obispo County)
Project Planned Development 11 (3F Meadows) requires a Master Plan of
Description: Development to be approved for the entire project site prior to recordation
of the final map. Staff is unable to make a determination of the Master Plan
of Development consistency. The Planning Commission will forward its
recommendation to City Council for consideration with the final map.
General Plan Designation: Rural Estates
Zoning District: Residential Suburban/PD-11
Vice Chairperson Fonzi stepped down from consideration of this item, as she was not present at
the last Commission meeting. Commissioner Kelley also stepped down from consideration of
this item as he had done so at the last Commission meeting. •
UU9
ITEM NUMBER: B- 1
DATE: 03/11/2003
• Chairperson Bentz read into the record the letter he had received from Castlerock Development
and which is included in the staff report on page 272. He asked Commissioner Jones to clarify
his Motion from the January 7, 2003 meeting.
Commissioner Jones explained why he made the Motion. He felt what the applicant said in his
presentation made sense, that it was their belief and understanding that the Master Plan that had
originally been adopted complied with the EIR and that any of the issues relating to exact
placement of things could be done at the staff level. Commissioner Jones stated that his Motion
put it squarely back at the Planning Department level using the language in the draft Resolution
that essentially said that because the original lot line adjustment had been approved and the City
Council certified the final EIR report, the lot line adjustment map was in conformance with the
lot line adjustment map and that the Master Plan of Development essentially complies with that.
Chairperson Bentz asked if there were any member of the Commission that did not understand
the Motion to be in that frame.
Commissioner Porter stated that upon seconding the Motion, he too felt that the Master Plan was
consistent with the EIR and it was being directed back to staff.
Commissioner Eddings agreed with Commissioner Porter and Jones.
Chairperson Bentz stated that he thought at the last meeting the Commission was wrestling with
the staff report that indicated that they were having a problem determining what was the Master
. Plan of Development and that there were two options in that report, Appendix B and Appendix A
dated 11/14/02. He was thinking when he made his vote that this would allow the Community
Development Director to decide whether or not he could issue the letter, and he was not
intending to make a recommendation to the City Council.
There was Commission consensus that their recommendation did not change.
Community Development Director Frace asked if the recommendation was that the 11/14/02
plan is consistent and that it is the plan recommended for the Director to adopt. There was
Commission consensus that this was the recommendation.
8. BROWN ACT TRAINING - THE CITY ATTORNEY WILL BRIEF THE
COMMISSION ON THE BROWN ACT REQUIREMENTS FOR OPEN
MEETINGS.
City Attorney Roy Hanley made a PowerPoint presentation on the Brown Act (Exhibit A), and
answered questions of the Commission.
•
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 03/11/2003
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORTS:
•
Community Development Director Frace reported on a Smart Growth Conference hosted by San
Luis Obispo County. All Commissioners are encouraged to attend and should contact Mr. Frace
or Annette Manier in the Community Development Department if interested.
ADJOURNMENT
Chairperson Bentz adjourned the meeting at 9:44 p.m. to the next regularly scheduled meeting on
February 4, 2003.
MEETING RECORDED AND MINUTES PREPARED BY:
Grace Pucci, Recording Secretary
The following exhibits are available for review in the Community Development Department.
Exhibit A—City Attorney Roy Hanley,PowerPoint presentation on Brown Act •
ATTACHMENT 3: Draft Resolution A
PD-7 Master Plan of Development(CUP 2000-0024)/ZCH2O00-0008ITTM 2001-0011
Approval of Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration
DRAFT RESOLUTION A
A RESOLUTION OF THE ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL CERTIFYING
PROPOSED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION 2002-0049 PREPARED
FOR ZONE CHANGE 2000-0008, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2000-0024 AND
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2001-0011
(6340 Alcantara Avenue/Russell)
WHEREAS, an application has been received from Lorraine Russell (PO Box 257,
Atascadero, CA 93423) Applicant and Property Owner to consider a project consisting of a
zone change from RMF-10 (Residential Multi-Family)to RMF-10/PD-7 (Residential Multi-
Family with Planned Development Overlay #7) with the adoption of a Master Plan of
Development, and a six lot residential Tentative Tract Map on APN 030-292-065 and,
WHEREAS, an Initial Study and Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration 2002-
0049 were prepared for the project and made available for public review in accordance with
the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA); and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero held a public
hearing following the close of the review period for the Initial Study and Draft Negative
Declaration to consider its adequacy; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, at a public hearing
held on Tuesday, January 21, 2003, recommended that the City Council certify Mitigated
Negative Declaration 2002-0049,
NOW, THEREFORE, the Atascadero City Council, at a public hearing held on
Tuesday, February 25, 2003, hereby resolves to certify Mitigated Negative Declaration 2002-
0049 based on the following Findings as shown on Exhibit A:
1. The Negative Declaration has been completed in compliance with CEQA; and,
2. The Mitigated Negative Declaration was presented to the Planning Commission,
and the information contained therein was considered by the Planning
Commission, prior to recommending action on the project for which it was
prepared; and,
3. The project does not have the potential to create a significant environmental
impact; and,
4. The Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration will be forwarded to the City Council,
and the information therein contained will be considered by the City Council,
prior to taking final action on the project.
City Council Draft Ordinance A
March 11,2003
Page 2 of 4
On motion by Council Member , and seconded by Council Member
the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ADOPTED:
By:
Jerry L. Clay, Sr., Mayor
Attest:
Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk
Approved as to form:
Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney
Attest:
Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk
Approved as to form:
Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney
673
Exhibit' A
Tr_•
,fF-N-,.. I FR-
.191 1979 CITY OF ATASCADERO
'.� = �;
PROPOSED MITIGATED
NEGATIVE DECLARATION #2002-0049
6500 Palma Avenue Atascadero, CA 93422 805/461-5035
Applicant: Lorraine Russell,3584 Maricopa Road,Atascadero,CA 93422
Project Title: Zone Change 2002-0008,Conditional Use Permit 2000-0024,Tentative Tract Map 2001-0011 for a 6-
lot residential PD-7 subdivision.
Project 6340 Alcantara Avenue,Atascadero,CA 93422(Vacant lot fronting Tecorida Avenue)
Location: (San Luis Obispo County)APN 030-292-065
Project The project consists of an application for a PD-7 zone change,conditional use permit,and vesting
Description: tentative tract map to subdivide a 1 acre parcel into 6 single-family residential lots ranging in size
between 6,106 and 8,510 square feet(An existing house will remain for a net gain of 5 new
lots/homes). The project includes one home per lot with varying architectural styles,colors and
materials. 31 native trees are to be preserved on site and 64 native trees are proposed for removal. In
addition,a seasonal creek will be preserved with project access bridging the creek from Tecorida
Avenue.
General Plan Designation: Medium Density Residential(10 units/acre)
• Zoning District: Residential Multiple Family—RMF-10
Findings:
1. The project does not have the potential to degrade the environment.
2. The project will not achieve short-term to the disadvantage of long term environmental goals.
3. The project does not have impacts which are individually limited,but cumulatively considerable.
4. The project will not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings either directly or indirectly.
Determination:
Based on the above findings,and the information contained in the initial study 2002-0049(made a part hereof by
reference and on file in the Community Development Department),it has been determined that the above project will
not have an adverse impact on the environment when the following proposed mitigation measures are incorporated
into the project(see attachment).
Prepared By: Steve McHarris,Planning Services Manager
Date Posted: November 27,2002
Public Review Ends: December 26,2002
Attachments: - Location Map
- Site&Landscape Plan
- Elevations
- Floor Plan
- Grading,Drainage&Utility Plan
- Initial Study 2002-0049
6 -74
Fa-=H300P0008.63i0 Akaauralo 6a FU-LLLSMND_
Rim Du.U26/0211:16 --
6500 PALMA AVENUE • ATASCADERO,CALIFORNIA 93422 (805)461-5035 FAX 461-5036
RECEIVED
CITY OF ATASCADERO DEC 32
1918' ° 11979
JULIE L.RODEW
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT By counyCleek
A1�
1)ep
CITY OF ATASCADERO
NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Atascadero Planning Commission will be holding a
public hearing to consider the following project and environmental determination. The public is
encouraged to attend.
Applicant: Lorraine Russell,3584 Maricopa Road,Atascadero,CA 93422
Project Title: Zone Change 2002-0008,Conditional Use Permit 2000-0024,Tentative Tract Map 2001-0011 for a 6-
lot residential PD-7 subdivision.
Project 6340 Alcantara Avenue,Atascadero,CA 93422(Vacant lot fronting Tecorida Avenue)
Location: (San Luis Obispo County)APN 030-292-065
Project The project consists of an application for a PD-7 zone change,conditional use permit,and vesting
Description: tentative tract map to subdivide a 1 acre parcel into 6 single-family residential lots ranging in size
between 6,106 and 8,510 square feet(An existing house will remain for a net gain of 5 new
lots/homes). The project includes one home per lot with varying architectural styles,colors and
materials. 31 native trees are to be preserved on site and 64 native trees are proposed for removal. In
addition,a seasonal creek will be preserved with project access bridging the creek from Tecorida
Avenue. . •
General Plan Designation: Medium Density Residential(10 units/acre)
Zoning District: Residential Multiple Family—RMF-10
Environmental Begins:November 27,2002
Review Dates: Ends: December 26,2002
Hearing Date: January 21,2003
Hearing Atascadero City Hall,7:00 p.m.
Location: 6500 Palma Avenue,4th Floor,Atascadero, CA 93422
Proposed Based on the initial study prepared for the project, a Mitigated Negative Declaration
Environmental is proposed. The proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration is available for public
Determination: review from 11/27/02 through 12/26/02 at 6500 Palma Avenue, Community
Development Department, Room 104, from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through
Friday.
Any interested person may review the proposed Negative Declaration and project files. Questions should be
directed to Steve McHarris,Planning Services Manager at 461-5032.
W en .Frace,Community Development Director Date •
F1c ZCH 2000.0008.6710 Ak.,t—o i..Rv..ILISMM—
Prim Data I V26=3:01 PM } 1
6500 PALMA AVENUE 0 ATASCADERO,CALIFORNIA 93422 (805)461-5035 FAX 461-5036 V lJ
1x79
CITY OFATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
Environmental Review 2002-0049
Applicant: Lorraine Russell,3584 Maricopa Road,Atascadero,CA 93422
Project Title: Zone Change 2002-0008,Conditional Use Permit 2000-0024,Tentative Tract Map 2001-0011 for 6-
lot residential PD-7 subdivision.
Project 6340 Alcantara Avenue,Atascadero,CA 93422(Vacant lot fronting Tecorida Avenue)
Location: (San Luis Obispo County)APN 030-292-065
Project The project consists of an application for a PD-7 zone change,conditional use permit,and vesting
Description: tentative tract map to subdivide a I acre parcel into 6 single-family residential lots ranging in size
between 6,106 and 8,510 square feet(An existing house will remain for a net gain of 5 new
lots/homes). The project includes one home per lot with varying architectural styles,colors and
materials. 31 native trees are to be preserved on site and 64 native trees are proposed for removal. In
addition,a seasonal creek will be preserved with project access bridging the creek from Tecorida
Avenue.
General Plan Designation: Medium Density Residential(10 units/acre)
Zoning District: Residential Multiple Family—RMF-10
�. Lead Agency Name City of Atascadero
and Address: 6500 Palma Avenue Atascadero, CA 93422
Contact Person and Steve McHarris,Planning Services Manager
Phone Number: City of Atascadero
6500 Palma Avenue,Room 104
Atascadero, CA 93422
General Plan Medium-Density Residential (10 units/acre)
Designation:
Zoning: RMF-10 Residential Multiple Family
Surrounding Land North: Residential
Uses and Setting:
South: Vacant/Residential
West: Tecorida Avenue/Commercial
East: Residential
Other public None
agencies whose
approval is required
(e.g.,permits,financing
approval,or participation
agreement)
1/26/02 ZCH 2000-0008.6340 Alcanlaralarraine RusseII.1SMND.sm r 1
CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY •
Attachment 1
Location Map
6340 Alcantara Avenue
Atascadero, CA
f I��
•
. .1
3�y N s
Q Project
' k Site
Y.
•
11/26/02 ZCH 2000-0008.6340 Alcantara.lorralne Russell.ISMNDAm— 077
y��h � ct-s'°""-1y�'s,'�ii L ttu r i t�k"�a -4• .��'L��ica ""k jy�,i ear'� .f ,2 �i ��i'�..: a-'{k �m
��'n'�+' s#:iAi�}Str�il`� � ��; ��T{'7.�'�c+yy ��ri .,�.�_+ 7. ci„? �'^•j:�' 3. ?y' �`�... �'
M3 .i�P�, yt k L 'a't'9i � � t Z. } _ ,`� •-"� .€ -
�„�4� rx-�`�i��;`�� .a?"��--.ia,°��v �5.',�b�w}rp�"�y� y�i .��'^ '�r"'� STC +. •z-ti���� >-.. � �t �"�'��ra'�~"'i`<' '�.,�. 7- "s'�-.
ic`l'Y�J �. - F�IfC��, } ll ���xSsl'+,p'+ �� �t i a�.� N' ...*.-t ��i j�xk -7t''�,� ,yF.�~-�+�•?csi. Y� L- r��'i�: _
x'�'� "�}'"+,„,�-+�- 4 8�t�i:°' .�_ t�sSr �' 4� Y• �4>t a.'� �.�r'�"Y•--�.�:;(���„�'�•.''s,. `-'� �,,,'y`"-t.�
r ..
' - .n-- 3i'4.`t��,►a ygfa-:.v w�� fi• ,r y...- � ,'��yµ.,.n 't`ir+-•,•'''
" - - r �= .,: ,_. R r 1�'`�'k-2y�' ��w �Y-Y t�s'�rt »s„r,���•�,i,,'ew�-s "x.'': - •�
a• ;`.n4 �+._.:;o�. �.ytq '-���''`�'r•"M�-c3`'��.� �`:..zYsd r -'t hr`����.. "'..� �"��
'T lry E'�. .y.-.air • � �j.(}r �,�'Sl4 � � _
'[s'{P�
t.q�^4M'�'Pt�inY �+�s,�, '�'kY33'
�r;�- }su+,Zs' YG:.�'' ,,ro�'3a "IS�""�' n•� �ti_ � ` �,�y*r"<�',�`� ."'`�f t T�-. 'tSs"''��.. $ 5-,
,.-a'L"'J�''�,'{��»`y'�.G'C- � .•s.�t j. � �'." '�'� �i 'is4�tf�� 'r--r d��s�� `4'�4
'$�
C'Yf�4 .�_ y� �, �• �.
���(. ?- .«,t �� w*•��r 1�' 3a.� r 4'T` - ;. - � � '"c. .-$'�y t 'e'er r} 1 '�`v
�a ir.'�''g. '}��'�dpF4+,y�u�}1' Y .o� ".i: f •. �-- �� T�`L�'0�r��_}� �.9 a°"� a`� �tY-' s � �
���yr �M c � l�.�i..4Y� �•`i-ed� r+• � "Yt�Yf-t���£O �T-! �. J Y_ C`,�'�,
lf` Sym}. T=et.A�+r�gyp- � -� t�� �, �1}S �'cx' y.. u ;..-n -s-•�
,A� .>` S 7�`",� y" &`�`^'3'�•�.�r L'4 s2:` y •.aX�i^•>w.✓��, -F�+�.'�}..�`�.�h�� ,, a ��'� sy �- -s-
+y ^� a4' �"`•y.'Y''t K moi; �'"',3 �'' �"' 4 � _",1 F� .6�rE� - t'�*`.R_"� sE .' K' '�.��y.- -^
-+.•sa+. - ► 't �S4 < FSw� .y.� .a-�:.. t !x- �' .. �.n`'%�
..� � �T��'r'•��`�.�..��.y•r`.�.� .�_`-. : F-.}' �-`''3�3 �i�X0'3��"yG�"�ii"s+-`;��'��y�`1"A 3-� • .
a+ ....►moi�.r s a s ;..is+��'i��. -�'t',iC+•y2,a�+",:��� •*'3. ���- �„,�
r���r'�.. y;��� d..� `.�_� '�J!',,�-.trot"•f't�- -yt.r..' �i y}�`s 4��y°3s�.,xe�-��b` ILLL�LLL i j �y�„�,�T, .
'` "'4 I'✓ Z-p a 'r,a1 �r�� ',s-� --;r '- 1- "r`� .� ¢� � tf�.�{� �g4Z�.�'�k9�.
Lin r
YEn• z; ;c: i.� �• a ^�'�s �i'� �'� AIN
Zv
41 , s
'���. �,,�„�.♦�,:.�;�.s `� rir lis-�a�: _ �'�'.' aSs.•..r�� t r'.�i'F F
¢a:n.. - -i. C."z i� -' ,.•.a�_:i.E',�RS���f„�'r.'_ ." �. ��=Yyy C+.`�>cam-# J -. "`.;
'� S �:r '� y"� +� w� � _.tr:r•a may _ �.,• �.-y�r c'^3t $3 _.. �"�`� ..1'* +�:sem:
y��W� "5-� r�„x"b-' z.�"��� fr d- ��► ..+�+�ie ..�t a� y^n r2`y,=�, '� 1
div-• 't -��4.s� Y<ai�'�`..a'�t�3" ..r • z'r. +, .' ;. .-:s.
-�saw--�'.'"'" -mss ..rfw. �•?.rc y���. t �
+, `
.r
n' CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY •
Attachment 3
Vesting Tentative Tract Map/Grading Plan/Site Plan
t,
K t
ytaj , .3
lit
1i lip
tz
'1 =141!
i;.ilijliiii IT
lit
j SIi
ssib
;12 tie]i3 O9 ; i t'
F; ;.y
i Z
�¢ •
11/26/02 ZCH 2000-0008.6340 Alcantara.Lorraine RusseII.ISMNOsm—
CITY OFATASCADERO
• INITIAL STUDY
Attachment 3
Preliminary Landscape Plan
43 J1
1 s,
iL
4 �Y
r .0 1 •' 1 Fi'L� .� . •fit{ly �-�.,,,''�.�� z,...� •t -
,.y A ..1l..y: � d ^s •�\ a ,-
1 IIw
1 J
3 .d ■ �� a3j; �sj �i# ill 9�t] � � ii=� a
i aa>3
i llll
Ix
IM
fill, 1 1F ° ;
#i dl tti :ijl ii = _ _ t ij 3 j jjP. t� ii � ai i 1� .i F
�■�
fill.
p
a
.j ji3 TO
i� 01
1126102
ZCH 2000-0006.6340 Alcantara-Lorraine Russell.ISMND.sm
080
�^ CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY .
Attachment 3
Lot 1 - Floor Plan
631
7 3
a 0 I•
0 4 a
. O o0
T' T 7
- 1M•OII
rl Wi• i
0 '
O 1 f
ssss:
WrciuH A.ToRR2TPIZ�1 rZ'•���j7,( •
- � ' /rda•oi�r•�av+ru ARCeHYlec7 tft�
Itiryi�¢ S
i esmx. RUN
1126102 ZCH 2000-0008.6340 Akentaralorraine Russell.ISMN0.snv u V
CITY OF ATASCADERO
• INITIAL STUDY Attachment 3
Lot 1 - Elevations
1UI _ e
ED
•
�aO
- QaO
adO
0 all
' s
WILLIAil A.T*ARCT
.AReNI:IGT
- 1� .flclft. vc Tlud j(Tfy,rc i(
u..um1711�t'; t _
11/26/02
ZCH 2000-0008.6340 Mcantara.Lorraine RussejI.ISMND.sm 682
CITY OFATASCADERO
MRAL STUDY •
Attachment 3
Lot 3 - Floor Plan
i
Lir
8 s � Jr
` 1"1it �L4r�
C:
r=a
''• I S
f I �
O
,. -o
tI
1
lit �111 I
.3-71
1
st z
I - WILLIAFf A.To--.T { i j
I .in.ce® xeser.eer Art
exrrccr r
141
iy •
sF:�IMOP
kl
1126/02 ZCH 2000-0008.6340 Akantara.lorraine RusseII.ISMNDsm" V V
CITY OFATASCADERO
• INITL4L STUDY
Attachment 3
Lot 3 - Elevations
El
I; z
. 0 0 [Ell
8 �
ooa
r
o
I
WILLIAM A.To -- I
ARCAITLCT S
oL I
•
11126102
ZCH 2000.0008.6340 Alcanlara.lorraine Russell-ISMND.sm 084
CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY •
Attachment 3
Lot 4- Floor Plan
I-
t
� L1.
- 0
i
a
O
_ O
I a_
I JJJws
� • mccriiJJ r.'tCRxit' (�'w � - �.I
1126/02 ZCH 2000-0008.6340 Alcantara.lorraine Russell.ISMND.s v V 5
4�1 "
CITY OFATASCADERO
• INITIAL STUDY
Attachment 3
Lot 4 - Elevations
19 Eln
-lam i
j
e f
I
{ rTF=9
19
oE
a .
' �ROS WILLIAM A..TORR[T F I
• .AKCHITZCT
L A.... i
..t.r .•
j 'a�ycerc�er n•u"w..�.iu e�u..•iiur �aii{{{; [I]��_(t •r�C�y 7
11/26/02 7�')lYr�
ZCH 2000.0008.6340 Alcantaralorraine Russell.ISMND sm u v V
CITY OF ATASCADERO
INTIZAL STUDY •
Attachment 3
Lot 5 - Floor Pian
[
L
b i iY
1 Nb {
- • III
4 �s'..• -� IIS
� I
1;'
8
i
1� I
i'
0 1
N
WILLIAM A ToRtx[T
i S riaoriae0 ioe per[ A..... N. a t'{{i.[.;`rtt�`eI 'L r I �•
hit[e[a 21 t it'll,
14�
.�-"e"'L >•u •[c -u:�ii 1:1�
1126/02 ZCH 2000-0008.6340 Alcanlaralorraine Russeil.ISMND.sm- ��
CITY OFATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
Attachment 3
Lot 5 - Elevations
r
F
�
i
'E I
i
� tui
; i
p
::r E
ROM V
e �
r
N
t WiLLIA4 A.TowRZT
am .gyp. Aftom zCT �(K
[ LCL6d8eLttfA�y A..1,k..e«. i'I.aaiaf �t �
u.....•..:i•sem i+:�ii... tl}ti ; I1�1(.^,t � '
11/26102
ZCH 2000-0008.6340 Alcantara-Lorraine Russell.ISMND.sm J
CITY OFATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
Exhibit A Timing Responsibility Mitigation
Mitigation Monitoring Program
/Monitoring Measure
ZCH 2002-0008, CU 2000-0024, TTM 2001-0011 c BUldingPertM PS:Bul ung woces
BP.Buldng Pemd BS:Bwldng Services
TO:Ter poray FD:Fin:DeparTmrtt
cccwPoSce
rent
6340 Alcantara Avenue dnspection ceC Engineer ar
F0:FM Occupancy ww:wasemal&
CnCity Attorney
AW&%.water Comp.
Mitigation Measure 1.c.1: All lighting shall be designed to eliminate any off site BP PS 1.c.1
glare. All exterior site lights shall utilize full cut-off,"hooded"lighting fixtures to
prevent offsite light spillage and glare. Any luminaire pole height shall not
exceed 30-feet in height,limit intensity to 2.0 foot candles at ingress/egress,
and otherwise 0.6 foot candle minimum to 1.0 maximum in parking areas.
Fixtures shall be shield cut-off type.
---:::
Mitigation Measure 1.c.2: The project landscape shall include requiring one BP PS 1.c.2
24-inch box sized tree within the front yard of each new residence.
Mitigation Measure 3.b: The project shall be conditioned to comply with all BP BS 3.b
applicable District regulations pertaining to the control of fugitive dust(PM-10)
as contained in section 6.4 of the Air Quality Handbook. All site grading and
demolition plans notes shall list the following regulations:
A. All material excavated or graded shall be sufficiently watered to prevent •
excessive amounts of dust. Watering shall occur at least twice daily with .
complete coverage,preferably in the late morning and after work is
finished for the day.
B. All clearing,grading,earth moving,or excavation activities shall cease
during periods of high winds(i.e.greater than 20 mph averaged over one
hour)so as to prevent excessive amounts of dust.
C. All material transported off-site shall be either sufficiently watered or
securely covered to prevent excessive amounts of dust.
D. The area disturbed by clearing,grading,earth moving,or excavation
operations shall be minimized so as to prevent excessive amounts of dust.
E. Permanent dust control measured identified in the approved project
revegetation and landscape plans shall be implemented as soon as
possible following completion of any soil disturbing activities.
F. Exposed ground areas that are planned to be reworked at dates greater
than one month after initial grading shall be sown with fast-germinating
native grass seed and watered until vegetation becomes established.
G. All disturbed areas not subject to revegetation shall be stabilized using
approved chemical soil binders,jute netting,or other methods in advance
by the APCD.
H. All roadways,driveways,sidewalks,etc.to be paved shall be completed as
soon as possible. In addition,structural foundations shall be completed as
soon as possible following building pad construction.
I. On-site vehicle speed shall be limited to 15 mph for any unpaved surface.
J. All unpaved areas with vehicle traffic shall be watered at least twice per
day, using non-potable water.
K. Streets adjacent to the project site shall be swept daily to remove silt which
may have accumulated from construction activities so as to prevent
excessive amounts of dust from leaving the site.
L. Wheel washers may be required when significant offsite import or export of •
fill is involved.
M. Large canopy shade trees shall be provided along street frontages and
within parking areas to shade paved areas and minimize urban heat build-
. . f
1126/02 ZCH 2000-0008.6340 Alcantara.Lorraine Russe1L1SMND.srn
CITY OF ATASCADERO
• INITIAL STUDY
Exhibit A Timing Responsibility Mitigation
Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure
ZCH 2002-0008, CU 2000-0024, TTM 2001-0011 GP:GradngPertM Ps:Rearing Ser&M
SR..Buildng Pert BS:Building Services
TOTecrv"y FD:FreDepanrrent
6340 Alcantara Avenue al r CECAyegineer eM
nspection CE City Engineer
FO:Final Occupancy WW:Was water
CA:Oty Attorney
AMWC:Water Comp.
up.
Mitigation Measure 4.b 1: The proposed creek bridge shall be supported by BP, Ps
city-approved caissons. Caisson locations shall be tested prior to drilling to GP 4.b.1
insure that no major roots are damaged. Adjacent trees shall have tree trunk
protection(2"x4"x8'boards wired together and secured around the tree trunk
prior to bridge.construction).
Mitigation Measure 4 b 2: As recommended by California Department of Fish BP, PS 4.b.2
&Game Notification R3-2001-0171: GP
• All work in the stream shall be confined to June 15 to October 15.
• No equipment will be operated in live(wet)stream channels.
■ Any runoff during construction shall be diverted so as not to enter the
stream. Sediment catchment basins,erosion control mats,fabric fences,or
other appropriate means shall be used when such diversion are necessary.
■ Wash water containing mud or silt from construction operations shall not be
allowed to enter the stream.
• Structures and associated materials not designed to withstand high
seasonal flows shall be removed to areas above the high water mark before
such flows occur. .
• No debris,soil,silt, bark,sawdust,rubbish,cement or concrete or washing
thereof,oil or petroleum products or other organic or earthen material from
construction or associated activity or whatever nature shall be allowed to
enter into or placed where it may be washed by rainfall or runoff into the
stream. When operation are completed,any excess materials or debris
shall be removed from the work area. No rubbish shall be deposited within
150 feet of the high water mark of the stream.
Mitigation Measure 4.e 1: The building permit site plan shall identify all 4.e.1
protection and enhancement measures recommended by the Certified Arborist
in the Tree Protection Plan.Tree protection fencing shall be installed at the
locations called out in the Tree Protection Plan.
Mitigation Measure 4.e.2: The developer shall contract with a certified arborist 4.e.2
during all phases of project implementation. The certified arborists shall be
responsible for monitoring the project during all phases of construction through
project completion, as follows:
(a) A written agreement between the arborist and the developer outlining a
arborist monitoring schedule for each construction phase through final
inspection shall be submitted to and approved by planning staff prior to the
issuance of buildirig/grading permits.
(b) Arborist shall schedule a pre-construction meeting with engineering
/planning staff,grading equipment operators,project superintendent to
review the project conditions and requirements prior to any grubbing or
earth work for any portion of the project site. All tree protection fencing
and trunk protection shall be installed for inspection during the meeting.
Tree protection fencing shall be installed at the line of encroachment into
the tree's root zone area. As identified in the tree protection plan,the root
zone equals 1-foot radius for every 1 inch of tree trunk diameter.Several
trees on this site will require tree trunk protection. Tree trunk protection is
• 2"x 4"x8 foot boards that are wired together and placed around the tree
trunk. Trees requiring this protection are:#5,6,20,21,22,32,33,34,and
35 as identified on the Tree Protection Plan.
11/26/02
ZCH 2000-0008.6340 Akantara.Lorraine RusseILISMND.sm .�}
CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY •
Exhibit A Timing Responsibility Mitigation
• Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure
GR ZCH 2002-0008 CU 2000-0024 TTM 2001-0011 EIRSUM gPemi` PS:Pladngs rvices
> > BP.BuBdng Permit 6S:fiudung Sxvices
TQ Tanporary FD:Fre Depavent
PD:Police Departrnent
6340 Alcantara Avenue R Find inspection CF_GtyEn,ineer
FO:Final Occupancy Ww:waster
CA C+gr,L—y
Amc,wadi carne.
(c) As specified by the arborist report and City staff:
• Remove all berry vines and trees designated for removal by hand;
• Prune all trees to be saved for structural strength and crown cleaning
by a licensed and certified arborist;
• Remove all debris and spoils from the lot cleaning and tree pruning.
• Grub only for the proposed driveway(do not grade nor compact).
• Install porous pavers over a three-inch bed of 3/.inch granite covered
with one-inch pea gravel for screeding.
• Use pegged curbs to secure the porous pavers. Pegged curbs are
reinforced six to eight curbs poured at grade with a one-foot by one-foot
pothole every four to six linear feet.
■ All trenching or grading within the protected root zone area,outside of
the tree protection fence shall require hand trenching or preserve and
protect roots that are larger than 2 inches in diameter.
■ No grading or trenching is allowed within the fenced protected area.
■ Any roots that are 4 inches in diameter or larger are not to be cut until
inspected and approved by the on-site arborist.
(d) Upon project completion and,prior to final occupancy a final status report .
shall be prepared by the project arborist certifying that the tree protection
plan was implemented,the trees designated for protection were protected
during construction,and the construction-related tree protection measures
are no longer required for tree protection.
Mitigation Measure 5.e: Should any cultural resources be unearthed during site GP BS 5.e
development work,the provisions of CEQA-Section 15064.5,will be followed
to reduce impacts to a non-significant level
Mitigation Measure 6.b.1: The grading permit application plans shall include GP PS,BS,CE 6.b.1
erosion control measures to prevent soil,dirt,and debris from entering the
storm drain system during and after construction. A separate plan shall be
submitted for this purpose and shall be subject to review and approval of the
City Engineer at the time of Building Permit application.
Mitigation Measure 6.b.2: All cut and fill slopes shall be hydroseeded with an GP PS,BS,CE 6.b.2
appropriate erosion control method(erosion control blanket,hydro-mulch,or
straw mulch appropriately anchored)immediately after completion of earthwork
between the months of October 15 through April 15. All disturbed slopes shall
have appropriate erosion control methods in place. Duration of the project:
The contractor will be responsible for the clean-up of any mud or debris that is
tracked onto public streets by construction vehicles.
Mitigation Measure 6.c.d: A soils report shall be required to be submitted with GP Bs s.c.d
a future building permit by the building department.The building plans will be
required to follow the recommendations of the soils report to assure safety for
occupants and buildings.
Mitigation Measure 8.e.f.1: A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan GP PS,BS,CE 8.0.1
(SWPPP)/Erosion Control Plan shall be submitted and approved by the City
Engineer prior to the issuance of the building permit. The plan shall include
storm water measures for the operation and maintenance of the project for the
review and approval of the City Engineer. The Building Permit application
plans shall identify Best Management Practices(BMPs)appropriate to the uses •
conducted on site that effectively prohibit the entry of pollutants into storm
water runoff.
1126/02 ZCH 2000-0008.6340 Akantara.Lorraine RusselLISMND.sm
0
CITY OFATASCADERO
• MTIAL STUDY
Exhibit A Timing Responsibility Mitigation
Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure
ZCH 2002-0008, CU 2000-0024, TTM 2001-0011 GP.GradNPenM PS.Plaruinggervie5
BA.Buddng Permit BS addng Services
Ta Teirwary FD:Fre Oepartrnent
6340 Alcantara Avenue �ar"y PtkPoke Departrnent
r�n CE City Engineer
FO".Final Occupancy Wet Wastmater
CA Cityam mey
AMC:Water Comp.
Mitigation Measure 8 e f 2: The developer is responsible for ensuring that all GP Ps,Bs,CE 8.e.f.2
contractors are aware of all storm water quality measures and that such
measures are implemented. Failure to comply with the approved construction
Best Management Practices will result in the issuance of correction notices,
citations,or stop orders.
Mitigation Measure 11 d: All construction activities shall comply with the City of BP, PSBs
Atascadero Noise Ordinance for hours of operation. GP , 11.d
Construction activities shall be limited to the following hours of operation:
• 7 a.m.to 7 p.m. Monday through Friday
• 9 a.m.to 6 p.m.Saturday
• No construction on Sunday
Further, particularly loud noises shall not occur before 8 a.m.on weekdays and
not at all on weekends.
The hours of construction may be modified by the Community Development
Director upon a determination that unusually loud construction activities are.
• having a significant impact on the neighbors.
Failure to comply with the above-described hours of operation may result in
withholding of inspections and possible construction prohibitions,subject to the
review and approval of the Planning Commission.
A sign shall be posted on-site with the hours of operation and a telephone
number of the person to be contacted in the event of any violations. The
details of such a sign shall be approved by staff during the Grading
Plan/BuildingPermit review lew process.
Mitigation Measure 16 c 1: Points of concentrated drainage into the creek shall GP Bs,CE
incorporate natural rock dprap designed to blend with the natural landscape 16.c.1
and function to dissipate energy and eliminate creek bank erosion,subject to
review and approval of the City Engineer.
•
1126/02 ZCH 2000-0008.6340 Alcantara.lorraine Russell.ISMNC cm- b 9 ',
CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY •
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project,involving at least
one impact that is a"Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages..
❑ Aesthetics ❑ Agriculture Resources ❑ Air Quality
❑ Biological Resources ❑ Cultural Resources ❑ Geology/Soils
❑ Hazards &Hazardous ❑ Hydrology/Water Quality ❑ Land Use/Planning
Materials
❑ Mineral Resources ❑ Noise ❑ Population/Housing
❑ Public Services ❑ Recreation ❑ Transportation/Traffic
❑ Utilities/Service Systems ❑ Mandatory Findings of Significance
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
❑ I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. •
® I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,there will
not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have
been added to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a"potentially significant effect"or"potentially significant
unless mitigated"impact on the environment,but at least one effect 1)has been adequately analyzed in an
earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2)has been addressed by mitigation measures
based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT is required,but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,there
WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects(a)have been
analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards
and(b)have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION,
including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project.
/J)A U 1#
Ste-,/e McHarris
Planning Services Manager
•
1128/02 ZCH 2000-0008.8340 AIcantara.Lorraine RusseII.ISMND.0 _ r 9 3
CITY OF ATASCADERO
. INITIAL STUDYEVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL DIPACTS:
1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except"No Impact"answers that are adequately supported by the
information sources a Lead Agency cites following each question. A"No Impact"answer is adequately
supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the
one involved(e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A"No Impact"answer should be explained
where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards(e.g.the project will not expose
sensitive receptors to pollutants,based on a project-specific screening analysis).
2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved,including off-site as well as on-site,cumulative as
well as project-level,indirect as well as direct,and construction as well as operational impacts.
3) "Potentially Significant Impact"is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. If
there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact"entries when the determination is made,an EIR is
required.
4) "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated"applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures
has reduced an effect from"Potentially Significant Impact"to a"Less than Significant Impact." The Lead
Agency must describe the mitigation measures,and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than
significant level(mitigation measures from Section XVII, 'Earlier Analyses,"may be cross-referenced).
5) Earlier analyses may be used where,pursuant to the tiering,program EIR,or other CEQA process,an effect has
been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). Earlier analyses
are discussed in Section XVII at the end of the checklist.
6) Lead Agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references information sources forotential
impacts(e.g.general plans,zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document
should,where appropriate,include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. A
source list should be attached. Other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion.
»/26102
2CN 2000-0008.6340 Alcantara.lorraine Russ
eII.ISMN®sm
CITY OFATASCADERO
IMTLAL STUDY
•
Initial Study 2002-0044 Potentially Less Than Less Than No
Significant Significant with Significant Impact
ZCH 2000-0008, CUP 2000-0024, TTM 2001-0011 Impact Mitigation Impact
6340 Alcantara Avenue Incorporation
1.AESTHETICS--Would the project:
a)Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?
b)Substantially damage scenic resources,including,but not
limited to,trees,rock outcroppings,and historic buildings
within a state scenic highway?
c)Substantially degrade the existing visual character or
quality of the site and its surroundings?
d)Create a new source of substantial light or glare that
would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? El V-Nj El
SOURCES: Project Description-Photos;Vesting Tentative Tract Map/Grading Plan/Site Plan,Sholders Land Survey;
11/21/02 Planning Staff Site Visit. Floor Plans&Elevations William Torrey,Architect; Preliminary Landscape Plan,
Omni Design Group; Color&Materials Sample Boards,William Torrey,Architect.
DISCUSSION: The project site is not located within a scenic vista. The site is within the City's multiple family
residential zoning district,bounded on three sides by existing residential uses,and the front by Alcantera Avenue and
commercial uses. Project conditions will require any lighting at the site to be designed to eliminate off site glare. The
proposed landscape plan and architectural features for the project will reduce the visual impacts to a less than
significant level. The proposed architectural style,colors and materials have been selected to be compatible with the
surrounding residential environment.
Mitigation Measure 1.c.1: If exterior lighting is proposed,it shall be designed to eliminate any off site glare. All
exterior site lights shall utilize full cut-off,"hooded"lighting fixtures to prevent offsite light spillage and glare. Any
luminaire pole height shall not exceed 25-feet in height,limit intensity to 2.0 foot candies at ingress/egress,and
otherwise 0.6 foot candle minimum to 1.0 maximum within the private street. Fixtures shall be shield cut-off type.
Mitigation Measure 1.c.2: The project landscape shall include requiring one 24-inch box sized tree within the front
yard of each new residence.
2.AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES: In determining whether
impacts to agricultural resources are significant
environmental effects,lead agencies may refer to the
California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment
Model(1997)prepared by the California Dept.of
Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing
impacts on agriculture and farmland.Would the project:
a)Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland,or Farmland
of Statewide Importance(Farmland),as shown on the maps
prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring
Program of the California Resources Agency,to non-
agricultural use?
b)Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use,or a
Williamson Act contract?
• c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which,
due to their location or nature,could result in conversion of El
Farmland,to non-agricultural use?
• - uJ 5
11126102 Page 20 ZCH 2000-0008.6340 Alcantara.Lorraine RussellJSMND.sm -
s;67-5-
CITY—
"" °a" OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY •
Initial Study 2002-0044 Potentially Less Than Less Than No
ZCH 2000-0008, CUP 2000-0024, TTM 2001-0011 Significant
tnt Si Mitigationith Significant Impact
6340 Alcantara Avenue Incorporation
SOURCES: Land Use Element EIR.
DISCUSSION
a.) The property is not shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of
the California Resources Agency as prime farmland.
b.) The property is not under a Williamson Act contract.
c.) The project will not result in the conversion of farmland to non-agricultural uses.
3.AIR QUALITY--The significance criteria established by
the Air Quality Control District in its CEQA Guidelines may
be relied upon to make the following determinations.Would
the project:
a)Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable
air quality plan?
b)Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially ® El
an existing or projected air quality violation?
c)Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any El
criteria pollutant for which the project region is.non- .
attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air
quality standard(including releasing emissions that exceed
quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)?
d)Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations? EJ
e)Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number
of people?
SOURCES: Air Pollution Control District(APCD)CEQA Air Quality Handbook, Project Description-Photos;Vesting
Tentative Tract Map/Grading Plan/Site Plan,Sholders Land Survey.
DISCUSSION:
3.a.c.)This project will not affect or produce any significant air pollutants after completion of construction.
Construction activities, including site grading may produce small quantities of air pollution, including dust and
equipment exhaust. Any air quality impacts will be temporary and short term.
3.b.)Construction activities,including site grading may produce small quantities of air pollution, including dust and
equipment exhaust. Any air quality impacts will be temporary and short term.
3.d.)The construction of a residential building,and the associated on-site and public improvements will not
concentrate pollutants.
3.e.)The construction of a residential building,and the associated on-site and public improvements will not create
objectionable odors.
Mitigation Measure 3.b: The project shall be conditioned to comply with all applicable District regulations pertaining to
the control of fugitive dust(PM-10)as contained in section 6.4 of the Air Quality Handbook. All site grading and
demolition plan notes shall list the following regulations:
A. All material excavated or graded shall be sufficiently watered to prevent excessive amounts of dust. Watering
shall occur at least twice daily with complete coverage,preferably in the late morning and after work is finished
for the day.
B. All clearing,grading,earth moving,or excavation activities shall cease during periods of high winds(i.e.greater
11rz6l02 Page 21 ZCH2O00-0008.6340 Alcantara.l.orraineRussel1.ISMN9.sm V
��- CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
• Potential) Less Than
Initial Y Less Than No
Significant Significant with Significant Impact
ZCH 2000-0008, CUP 2000-0024, TTM 2001-0011 Impact Mitigation Impact
6340 Alcantara Avenue Incorporation
than 20 mph averaged over one hour)so as to prevent excessive amounts of dust.
C. All material transported off-site shall be either sufficiently watered or securely covered to prevent excessive
amounts of dust.
D. The area disturbed by clearing,grading,earth moving,or excavation operations shall be minimized so as to
prevent excessive amounts of dust.
E. Permanent dust control measured identified in the approved project revegetation and landscape plans shall be
implemented as soon as possible following completion of any soil disturbing activities.
F. Exposed ground areas that are planned to be reworked at dates greater than one month after initial grading shall
be sown with fast-germinating native grass seed and watered until vegetation becomes established.
G. All disturbed areas not subject to revegetation shall be stabilized using approved chemical soil binders,jute
netting,or other methods in advance by the APCD.
H. All roadways,driveways,sidewalks, etc.to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible. In addition,
structural foundations shall be completed as soon as possible following building pad construction.
I. On-site vehicle speed shall be limited to 15 mph for any unpaved surface.
J. All unpaved areas with vehicle traffic shall be watered at least twice per day,using non-potable water.
K. Streets adjacent to the project site shall be swept daily to remove silt which may have accumulated from
construction activities so as to prevent excessive amounts of dust from leaving the site.
L. Wheel washers may be required when significant offsite import or export of fill is involved.
M. Large canopy shade trees shall be provided along street frontages and within parking areas to shade paved
areas and minimize urban heat build-up.
• 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES--Would the project:
a)Have a substantial adverse effect,either directly or E 1:1 El
through habitat modifications,on any species identified as a
candidate,sensitive,or special status species in local or
regional plans,policies,or regulations,or by the California
Department of Fish and Game or U.S.Fish and Wildlife
Service?
b)Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat 1171
or other sensitive natural community identified in local or
regional plans,policies,or regulations or by the California
Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife
Service?
c)Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected
wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(including,but not limited to,marsh,vernal pool,coastal,
etc.)through direct removal,filling, hydrological interruption,
or other means?
d)Interfere substantially with the movement of any native
resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with
established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors,or
impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
e)Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting EJ ® ❑
biological resources,such as a tree preservation policy or
ordinance?
D Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat
• Conservation Plan,Natural Community Conservation Plan, EJ El le-IN
or other approved local,regional,or state habitat
conservation plan?
97 11/26/02 Page 22 ZCH 2000-0008.6340 Alcantara.Lorraine Russell.ISMNDsrr
CITY OFATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
•
Initial Study 2002-0044 Potentially Less Than Less Than No
ZCH 2000-0008, CUP 2000-0024, TTM 2001-0011 Significant
tnt Significant
Mit gat onith SiImipfi cant Impact
6340 Alcantara Avenue Incorporation
SOURCES: Project Description-Photos;Vesting Tentative Tract Map/Grading Plan/Site Plan,Sholders Land Survey;
Preliminary Landscape Plan,Omni Design Group;Tree Protection&Tree Preservation Plan, 1/22/02,Jack Brazeal;
Tree Protection Plan Revision, 11/9/02,Jack Brazeal; Biological Assessment and Wetland Delineation,2/25/02,
Morro Group; Drainage Analysis,2/22/02, Eric Gobler Civil Engineering;Streambed Alteration Notification Review
(R3-2001-1071),3/28/02,California Department of Fish&Game; 11/21/02 Planning Staff Site Visit, Land Use
Element EIR,Atascadero Tree Ordinance.
DISCUSSION:
4.a.) No sensitive species have been found near the site.
4.b.) The project will involve construction surrounding a seasonal creek with the project access bridging the creek.
Although no work is proposed within the creek,the below stated-mitigation measures have been included as
recommended by the California Department of Fish&Game.
4.c.) There are no wetlands on the project site.
4.d.) The Land Use Element EIR concludes that development within the city limits will not have a significant impact
on wildlife or wildlife corridors.
4e.f.)The proposed project will not conflict with local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources nor will it
conflict with any conservation plans. With the below-stated mitigation measures,impacts to native trees will be
reduced to a level of insignificance,consistent with the Atascadero Municipal Code Section 9-11.105.
Mitigation Measure 4.b.1: The proposed creek bridge shall be supported by city-approved caissons. Caisson
locations shall be tested prior to drilling to insure that no major roots are damaged. Adjacent trees shall have tree
trunk protection(2"x4"x8'boards wired together and secured around the tree trunk prior to bridge construction). •
Mitigation Measure 4.b 2: As recommended by California Department of Fish&Game Notification R3-2001-0171:
■ All work in the stream shall be confined to June 15 to October 15.
■ No equipment will be operated in live(wet)stream channels.
■ Any runoff during construction shall be diverted so as not to enter the stream. Sediment catchment basins,
erosion control mats,fabric fences,or other appropriate means shall be used when such diversion are necessary.
■ Wash water containing mud or silt from construction operations shall not be allowed to enter the stream.
■ Structures and associated materials not designed to withstand high seasonal flows shall be removed to areas
above the high water mark before such flows occur.
• No debris,soil,silt, bark,sawdust,rubbish,cement or concrete or washing thereof,oil or petroleum products or
other organic or earthen material from construction or associated activity or whatever nature shall be allowed to
enter into or placed where it may be washed by rainfall or runoff into the stream. When operation are completed,
any excess materials or debris shall be removed from the work area. No rubbish shall be deposited within 150
feet of the high water mark of the stream.
Mitigation Measure 4.e 1: The building permit site plan shall identify all protection and enhancement measures
recommended by the Certified Arborist in the Tree Protection Plan.Tree protection fencing shall be installed at the
locations called out in the Tree Protection Plan.
Mitigation Measure 4.e.2: The developer shall contract with a certified arborist during all phases of project
implementation. The certified arborists shall be responsible for monitoring the project during all phases of
construction through project completion,as follows:
(a) A written agreement between the arborist and the developer outlining a arborist monitoring schedule for each
construction phase through final inspection shall be submitted to and approved by planning staff prior to the
issuance of building/grading permits.
(b) Arborist shall schedule a pre-construction meeting with engineering/planning staff,grading equipment operators,
project superintendent to review the project conditions and requirements prior to any grubbing or earth work for
any portion of the project site. All tree protection fencing and trunk protection shall be installed for inspection
during the meeting. Tree protection fencing shall be installed at the line of encroachment into the tree's root zone
area. As identified in the tree protection plan,the root zone equals 1-foot radius for every 1 inch of tree trunk
1rz6<02 Page 23 ZCH 2000-0008.6340 Alcantara.Lorraine Russell.ISMND.sm
CITY OFATASCADER0
• MTLAL STUDY
Initial Study 2002-0044 Potentially Less Than Less Than No
Significant Significant with Significant Impact
ZCH 2000-0008, CUP 2000-0024, TTM 2001-0011 Impact Mitigation Impact
6340 Alcantara Avenue Incorporation
diameter.Several trees on this site will require tree trunk protection. Tree trunk protection is 2"x 4"x8 foot
boards that are wired together and placed around the tree trunk. Trees requiring this protection are:#5,6,20,
21,22,32,33,34,and 35 as identified on the Tree Protection Plan.
(c) As specified by the arborist report and City staff:
■ Remove all berry vines and trees designated for removal by hand;
■ Prune all trees to be saved for structural strength and crown cleaning by a licensed and certified arborist;
■ Remove all debris and spoils from the lot cleaning and tree pruning.
• Grub only for the proposed driveway(do not grade nor compact).
■ Install porous pavers over a three-inch bed of/4 inch granite covered with one-inch pea gravel for screeding.
■ Use pegged curbs to secure the porous pavers. Pegged curbs are reinforced six to eight curbs poured at
grade with a one-foot by one-foot pothole every four to six linear feet.
• All trenching or grading within the protected root zone area,outside of the tree protection fence shall require
hand trenching or preserve and protect roots that are larger than 2 inches in diameter.
• No grading or trenching is allowed within the fenced protected area.
■ Any roots that are 4 inches in diameter or larger are not to be cut until inspected and approved by the on-site
arborist.
(d) Upon project completion and prior to final occupancy a final status report shall be prepared by the project arborist
certifying that the tree protection plan was implemented,the trees designated for protection were protected
during construction,and the construction-related tree protection measures are no longer required for tree
protection.
. 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES--Would the project:
a)Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of
a historical resource as defined in'15064.5?
b)Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of
an archaeological resource pursuant to'15064.5?
c)Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological
resource or site or unique geologic feature? El
d) Disturb any human remains,including those interred
outside of formal cemeteries?
SOURCES: Project Description-Photos; 11/21/02 Planning Staff Site Visit; Land Use Element EIR.
DISCUSSION:5.a) None on site.
5 b.c.d)No known archeological or cultural sites have been found or documented in the vicinity of the project.
Mitigation Measure 5.e: Should any cultural resources be unearthed during site development work,the provisions of
CEQA-Section 15064.5,will be followed to reduce impacts to a non-significant level.
6.GEOLOGY AND SOILS--Would the project:
a)Expose people or structures to potential substantial
adverse effects,including the risk of loss,injury,or death
involving:
I)Rupture of a known earthquake fault,as delineatedEl
• on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault El
Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area
or based on other substantial evidence of a known
1126/02 Page 24 ZCH 2000-0008.6340 A cantara.Larraine RusseII.ISMND.sm V J
CITY OFATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY •
Initial Study 2002-0044 Potentially Less Than Less Than No
ZCH 2000-0008, CUP 2000-0024,TTM 2001-0011
Significant
Significant Mitigation Significant
Impact
6340 Alcantara Avenue Incorporation
fault?Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special
Publication 42.
ii)Strong seismic ground shaking? ❑ ❑ ❑
iii)Seismic-related ground failure,including ❑ ❑
liquefaction?
iv)Landslides? ❑ ❑ ❑
b)Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? ❑ ® ❑
c)Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable,or
that would become unstable as a result of the project,and ® ❑
potentially result in on-or off-site landslide,lateral
spreading,subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
d)Be located on expansive soil,as defined in Table 18-1-B
of the Uniform Building Code(1994),creating substantial ® ❑
risks to life or property?
e)Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of ❑ ❑
septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems •
where sewers are not available for the disposal of
wastewater?
SOURCES: Project Description-Photos; 11/21/02 Planning Staff Site Visit. Land Use Element EIR,Project
Description-Photos;Vesting Tentative Tract Map/Grading Plan/Site Plan,Sholders Land Survey.
DISCUSSION:
6.a.) The project is not located on any known earthquake faults.
6.b.) Construction activities on the site will be required to comply with sedimentation and erosion control measures
prescribed by the city engineer.
6.c.d) Soils issues will be addressed by mitigation measures below.
6.e)Project will not require septic.
Mitigation Measure 6 b 1: The grading permit application plans shall include erosion control measures to prevent
soil,dirt,and debris from entering the storm drain system during and after construction. A separate plan shall be
submitted for this purpose and shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer at the time of Building
Permit application.
Mitigation Measure 6.b.2: All cut and fill slopes shall be hydroseeded with an appropriate erosion control method
(erosion control blanket,hydro-mulch,or straw mulch appropriately anchored)immediately after completion of
earthwork between the months of October 15 through April 15. All disturbed slopes shall have appropriate erosion
control methods in place. Duration of the project: The contractor will be responsible for the cleari-up of any mud or
debris that is tracked onto public streets by construction vehicles.
Mitigation Measure 6 c d: A soils report shall be required to be submitted with a future building permit by the building
department.The building plans will be required to follow the recommendations of the soils report to.assure safety for
occupants and buildings. The property contains no unusual geological formations.
7. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIA •
LS—Would the
L
11rz6M2 Page 25 i
ZCH 2000-0008.6340 Alcantara.l.orraine Russell.ISMND.sm 'L
CITY OFATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
Initial Study 2002-0044 Potentially Less Than Less Than No
Significant Significant with Significant Impact
ZCH 2000-0008, CUP 2000-0024,TTM 2001-0011 Impact Mitigation Impact
6340 Alcantara Avenue Incorporation
Engineer. The Building Permit application plans shall identify Best Management Practices(BMPs)appropriate to the
uses conducted on site that effectively prohibit the entry of pollutants into storm water runoff.
Mitigation Measure 8.e.f.2: The developer is responsible for ensuring that all contractors are aware of all storm water
quality measures and that such measures are implemented. Failure to comply with the approved construction Best
Management Practices will result in the issuance of correction notices,citations,or stop orders.
19.LAND USE AND PLANNING-Would the project:
a)Physically divide an established community? ❑ ❑ ❑
b)Conflict with any applicable land use plan,policy,or ❑ ❑ ® ❑
regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project
(including,but not limited to the general plan,specific plan,
local coastal program,or zoning ordinance)adopted for the
purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect?
c)Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or
natural community conservation plan? ❑ ❑ ❑
• SOURCES: Land.Use Element,Circulation Element,project description,Land Use Element EIR,memorandum from
the Chief of Wastewater Operations;Vesting Tentative Tract Map/Grading Plan/Site Plan,Sholders Land Survey;
Floor Plans&Elevations William Torrey,Architect;Preliminary Landscape Plan,Omni Design Group;Color&
Materials Sample Boards,William Torrey,Architect;Tree Protection&Tree Preservation Plan, 1/22/02,Jack Brazeal;
Tree Protection Plan Revision, 11/9/02,Jack Brazeal.
DISCUSSION:
9.a. The project will not physically divide an established community. A residential use along Alcantara Avenue is
consistent and compatible with the surrounding residential land use designation.
9.b.The General Plan identifies this site,along with adjacent properties as residential. The proposed project includes
street frontage improvements along Alcantara Avenue.
9.c.The project is consistent with the open space and conservation policies identified in the General Plan.
10. MINERAL RESOURCES--Would the project:
a)Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral VIq
resource that would be of value to the region and the
residents of the state?
b)Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important ❑ ❑ ❑
Im
mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general
plan,specific plan or other land use plan?
SOURCES: Project Description-Photos; 11/21/02 Planning staff site visit.
DISCUSSION:
• 10.a.b. No mining is proposed as a part of this project. No known mineral resources have been identified in the area. j
Page 28
1126/02 9 ZCH 2000-0008.6340 Alpntara.Lorraine RusseILISMNDsm
Ve
CITY OFATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
Initial Study 2002-0044 Potential) Less Than •
Y n Less Than No
Significant Significant nith Significant Impact 2000-0008, CUP 2000-0024,TTM 2001-0011 Impact MImp
6340 Alcantara Avenue Incorporation
11. NOISE—Would the project result
a)Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in El ❑
excess of standards established in the local general plan or
noise ordinance,or applicable standards of other agencies?
b)Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive E]ground-borne vibration or ground-bome noise levels?
Inj
c)A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels ❑
in the project vicinity above levels existing without the
project?
d)A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient E] ® ❑ ❑
noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing
without the project?
e)For a project located within an airport land use plan or,
where such a plan has not been adopted,within two miles of
El
a public airport or public use airport,would the project
expose people residing or working in the project area to
excessive noise levels?
0 For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip,would EJ
the project expose people living or working in the project
area to excessive noise levels?
SOURCES: Project description,Noise Element,Noise Ordinance,Acoustical Design Manual.
DISCUSSION:
11 a.b.c.d. Construction is expected to involve some heavy machinery and use of impact tools that make noise.
Noise levels on the site are thus expected to be raised temporarily. The future commercial use is not expected to
generate unacceptable levels of noise to future adjacent commercial uses.
11.e.f. The project is not located within an airport land use plan or private airstrip. y.
Mitigation Measure 11 d: All construction activities shall comply with the City of Atascadero Noise Ordinance for
hours of operation.
Construction activities shall be limited to the following hours of operation:
• 7 a.m.to 7 p.m.Monday through Friday
• 9 a.m.to 6 p.m.Saturday
• No construction on Sunday
Further,particularly loud noises shall not occur before 8 a.m.on weekdays and not at all on weekends.
The hours of construction may be modified by the Community Development Director upon a determination that
unusually loud construction activities are having a significant impact on the neighbors.
Failure to comply with the above-described hours of operation may result in withholding of inspections and possible
construction prohibitions,subject to the review and approval of the Planning Commission.
A sign shall be posted on-site with the hours of operation and a telephone number of the person to be contacted in
the event of any violations. The details of such a sign shall be approved by staff during the Grading Plan/Building
Permit review process.
•
1112602 Page 29
ZCH 2000-0008.8340 Alcantara.Lormine RusseILISMNDsm 102
02
s
CITY OFATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
•
Initial Study 2002-0044 Potentially Less Than Less Than No
ZCH 2000-0008, CUP 2000-0024, TTM 2001-0011 SiImpactgnificantSi Mitggationith Signif
Impact
6340 Alcantara Avenue Incorporation
b)Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere E] ® ❑
substantially with groundwater recharge such that there
would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the
local groundwater table level(e.g.,the production rate of
previously-existing nearby wells would drop to a level that
would not support existing land uses or planned uses for
which permits have been granted)?
c)Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site ❑ ❑ ❑
or area,including through the alteration of the course of a
stream or river,in a manner which would result in
substantial erosion or siltation on-or off-site?
d)Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site ❑ ❑
or area,including through the alteration of the course of a ILN
stream or river,or substantially increase the rate or amount
of surface runoff in a manner that would result in flooding
on-or off-site?
e)Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the ❑ ® ❑ ❑
capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems
or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff?
. f)Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? El ❑
g)Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area asEl ❑
mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood El
Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map?
h)Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures that ❑
would impede or redirect flood flows?
i)Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, ❑ FA
injury or death involving flooding,including flooding as a
result of the failure of a levee or dam?
j)Inundation by seiche,tsunami,or mudflow? ❑ ❑
SOURCES: Project description,Flood Insurance Rate Map 060700 0003 B(1/20/82); 11/21/02 Planning Staff Site
Visit; Preliminary Landscape Plan,Omni Design Group;Biological Assessment and Wetland Delineation,2/25/02,
Morro Group; Drainage Analysis,2/22/02, Eric Gobler Civil Engineering;Streambed Alteration Notification Review
(R3-2001-1071),3/28/02,California Department of Fish&Game.
DISCUSSION:
8a. The construction will not violate wateru
q allty standards.
8b. Theroject will not de 1
P 1 p eteround water supplies. Water will
9 pp be provided by Atascadero Mutual Water
Company.
8c.d.e.f. The project will not alter any drainage course. Construction activities are subject to review for compliance
with City drainage and grading regulations. Drainage will not be permitted to create or intensify any hazards for
persons or property in the vicinity.
8.g.h.i. Future commercial uses will be outside of the 100-year flood hazard area.
8.i.j. The project area is not subject to innundation by a tsunami.
• Mitigation Measure 8e.f.1: A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan(SWPPP)/Erosion Control Plan shall be
submitted and approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of the building permit. The plan shall include
storm water measures for the operation and maintenance of the project for the review and approval of the City
1126102 Page 27 ZCH 2O00-0008.6340 AIcantara.Lorraine Russell.ISMNO.sm— s �J
CITY OFATASCADERO
IlVITIAL STUDY .
Initial Study 2002-0044 Potentially Less Than Less Than No
ZCH 2000-0008, CUP 2000-0024, TTM 2001-0011 Significant Impact
SignificantMitigatonith SiImptaccttnt Impact
6340 Alcantara Avenue Incorporation
project:
a)Create a significant hazard to the public or the ❑
environment through the routine transport,use,or disposal
of hazardous materials?
b)Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and
accident conditions involving the release of hazardous
materials into the environment?
c)Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely E
hazardous materials,substances,or waste within one-
quarter mile of an existing or proposed school?
d)Be located on a site which is included on a list of El
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government kcsl
Code Section 65962.5 and,as a result,would it create a
significant hazard to the public or the environment?
e)For a project located within an airport land use plan area
or,where such a plan has not been adopted,within two
miles of a public airport or public use airport,would the
project result in a safety hazard for people living or working •
in the project area?
0 For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip,would
the project result in a safety hazard for people living or El
working in the project area?
g)Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an
adopted emergency response plan or emergency
evacuation plan?
h)Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss,
injury or death involving wildland fires,including where
wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where
residences are intermixed with wildlands?
SOURCES: Project description,General Plan Land Use Element.
DISCUSSION
7a.b.c. The project is not anticipated to generate or involve use of significant amounts of hazardous materials.There
are no known hazardous materials on the site or nearby.
7.d. The property is not a listed hazardous material site.
7e.f. The property is not near an airport.
7g.h.The site is within the Fire Department's seven-minute response area and a fire department turn around will be
provided within 150 feet of the residence.The Fire Marshall will determine if the residence will have fire sprinklers
during review of the building permit.
8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY--Would the
project:
a)Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge •
requirements? ❑
11/26/02 Page 26
ZCH 2000-0008.6340 Alcantara.Lorraine Russeli.ISMNO.srr 10 4_
/ `R
CITY OFATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
• Initial Study 2002-0044 Potentially Less Than Less Than
No
Significant Significantwith Significant Impact 2000-0008, CUP 2000-0024, TTM 2001-0011 Impact ationImpact
6340 Alcantara Avenue Incorporation
12. POPULATION AND HOUSING--Would the project:
a) Induce substantial population growth in an area,either
directly(for example,by proposing new homes and
businesses)or indirectly(for example,through extension of
roads or other infrastructure)?
b)Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, 1771
necessitating the construction of replacement housing EJ M V1\1
elsewhere?
c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the
construction of replacement housing elsewhere? El El
SOURCES: Project description,General Plan Land Use Element.
DISCUSSION:
12.a. No housing or new streets are proposed.
12.b.c.No housing or persons will be displaced.
XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES
a)Would the project result in substantial adverse physical
impacts associated with the provision of new or physically
altered governmental facilities,need for new or physically
altered governmental facilities,the construction of which
could cause significant environmental impacts,in order to
maintain acceptable service ratios,response times or other
performance objectives for any of the public services:
Fire protection? El
Police protection? ❑ ❑
Schools? ❑ ❑
Parks? E] ❑
El
Other public facilities? E
El
SOURCES: Project descri tion Lan
J p d Use Element EIR.
DISCUSSION:
Development Impact Fees: Development Impact Fees will be required of any new project for which a building permit
is issued. The concept of the impact fee program is to fund and sustain improvements which are needed as a result
of new development as stated in the General Plan and other policy documents within the fee program. Development
Impact Fees fall into the following categories: Drainage Fees(including the Amapoa Tecorida Drainage Area Fee);
Streets,Road, Bridge Fees;Sewer Fees; Public Safety Fees;and Park Fees,Miscellaneous Fees. In addition,
school fees are collected by the Atascadero Unified School District. The amount of impact fees to be paid will be
determined at the time of issuance of building permit.
• Flre and Police: Impact fees are charged for new development,to help pay the cost of providing new facilities to
serve the expanding city.The Fire Department of the City of Atascadero has indicated that it will be able to
adequately service the proposed project. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Fire Department.
1126102 Page 30 ZCH 2000-0008.6340 Alcantara.Lorraine RusseII.ISMND Vn _ 105
CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
Initial Study 2002-0044 Potentially Less Than Less Than No
ZCH 2000-0008, CUP 2000-0024, TTM 2001-0011 SiImp ct Si Mitgation�th SiImpacctnt Impact
6340 Alcantara Avenue Incorporation
The City of Atascadero Police Department has also indicated that the proposed project poses no problems to the
police to adequately service it.
Schools: At buildout,the city's population will overburden the existing school system unless additional classroom
space is added.The Atascadero Unified School District charges impact fees to fund additional schools as needed.
State law restricts mitigation of school impacts to the levying of these fees and other measures adopted by the
school district. Provision of adequate facilities for the population is the responsibility of the school district. Fees will
be required through construction permits for the residence.
Parks: New residences will increase demand on parks and recreation facilities.The city's Parks& Recreation
Commission is committed to finding ways to continue to provide parks and other recreational opportunities to city
residents as the city expands,thereby addressing cumulative impacts. No new residences are proposed.
Other public facilities:The construction of the project is not expected to have significant impacts on any other public
facilities.
14. RECREATION--
a)Would the project increase the use of existing El ❑
neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational
facilities such that,substantial physical deterioration of the
facility would occur or be accelerated? •
b)Does the project include recreational facilities or require
the construction or expansion of recreational facilities that
might have an adverse physical effect on the environment?
SOURCES: Project description, Parks and Recreation Element.
DISCUSSION:
15.a. Residents are expected to use existing parks and recreational facilities,but the numbers are not expected to
result in substantial physical deterioration of any facilities.
15.b. The project does not involve construction of recreational facilities.
1 5.TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC--Would the project:
a)Cause an increase in traffic that is substantial in relation ® a
to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system El El
(i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of
vehicle trips,the volume to capacity ratio on roads,or
congestion at intersections)?
b)Exceed,either individually or cumulatively,a level of E E
service standard established by the county congestion
management agency for designated roads or highways?
c)Result in a change in air traffic patterns,including either FA
an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that El El ILIJ
results in substantial safety risks?
d)Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature E
El(e.g.,sharp curves or dangerous intersections)or •
incompatible uses(e.g.,farm equipment)?
e)Result in inadequate emergency access?
11rz6ro2 Page 31 6
ZCH 2000-0008.6340 Alpnta2,Lorraine Russell.ISMNDsm
+
-15;*6 0�
CITY OF ATA
SCADER®
INITIAL STUDY
• Initial Stud 2002-004 Potential! Less Than
}/ 4 Y Less Than No
Significant Significant with Significant Impact
ZCH 2000-0008, CUP 2000-0024, TTM 2001-0011 Impact Mitigation Impact
6340 Alcantara Avenue Incorporation
❑ ❑ ❑
0 Result in inadequate parking capacity? ❑ ❑ ❑
g)Conflict with adopted policies,plans,or programs ❑ ❑ El
alternative transportation(e.g.,bus turnouts,
bicycle racks)?
SOURCES: Land Use Element,Circulation Element;Vesting Tentative Tract Map/Grading Plan/Site Plan,Sholders
Land Survey.
DISCUSSION:
15.a.b.The Circulation Element(CE)anticipates an increase in development in this area. The CE incorporates
mitigation for effects from increased traffic.
15.c. No changes will occur to the air traffic patterns.
15.d. The project's access has adequate site distance onto Tecorida Avenue.
15.e. The project will have adequate emergency access from Tecorida Avenue.
15.f. Adequate parking will be provided on-site for the future residential use.
15.g. The project is consistent with the area circulation and per the General Plan. The applicant shall provide a
reciprocal access easement with the adjoining properties to the north,central and south. Pave-out,curb,gutter,
sidewalk and landscaping are required along the entire property frontage. Public Improvement plans are required to
detail the construction.
•
16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS TEMS--Would the
project:
a)Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the ❑ ❑ ❑
applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board?
b)Require or result in the construction of new water or ❑ ❑ ® ❑
wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing
facilities,the construction of which could cause significant
environmental effects?
c)Require or result in the construction of new storm water ❑ ® ❑
drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities,the ❑ '
construction of which could cause significant environmental
effects?
d)Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the ❑ ❑
project from existing entitlements and resources,or are new
or expanded entitlements needed?
e)Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment ❑ ❑
provider that serves or may serve the project that it has
adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand
in addition to the provider's existing commitments?
0 Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity toEl F1accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs?
El• g)Comply with federal,state,and local statutes and
regulations related to solid waste?
SOURCES: Project description,Land Use Element(LUE)EIR;Vesting Tentative Tract Map/Grading Plan/Site Plan,
1126102 Page e 32 A ;�f
ZCH 2000-0008.6340 Alcanfara.Lorraine RusseILISMND�m_ O
�y
CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY •
Initial Study 2002-0044 Potentially Less Than Less Than No
ZCH 2000-0008, CUP 2000-0024,TTM 2001-0011
Significant Si Mitigation th Significant Impact
Impact 9 Impact
6340 Alcantara Avenue Incorporation
Sholders Land Survey.
DISCUSSION:
Water The Atascadero Mutual Water Company(AMWC)will provide water. All property within the city limits is
entitled to water from the AMWC. The project is not expected to require significant quantities of water for the
proposed uses.
Water is pumped from two portions of the largest underground basin in the county,the Paso Robles Formation, using
a series of shallow and deep wells.The water company anticipates that it will be able to meet the city's needs through
buildout and beyond:
Water demand at buildout under the LUE is estimated at about 8,500 acre-feet per year(AFY).The total available
groundwater supply greatly exceeds demand,according to the findings of the Long-Term Viability of Water study.
However,the water company does not currently have the deep wells needed to tap into the total amount needed at
buildout. The water company is currently developing plans for installing wells where they will be most effective and
will not conflict with water rights of others. According to the Water Company,development of additional wells is
expected to keep pace with construction in the city,so that water supply will not be interrupted.
Sewer. Sewer discharge will be handled by an on City sewer connection.
Storm Water. On-site storm water drainage has been designed to flow follow existing drainage pattern with flows into
the on-site seasonal creek. Points of concentrated drainage into the creek shall incorporate natural rock riprap
designed to blend with the natural landscape and function to dissipate energy and eliminate creek bank erosion.
Mitigation Measure 16 c 1: Points of concentrated drainage into the creek shall incorporate natural rock riprap
designed to blend with the natural landscape and function to dissipate energy and eliminate creek bank erosion,
subject to review and approval of the City Engineer.
17.MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE--
a)Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality El
of the environment,substantially reduce the habitat of a fish
or wildlife species,cause a fish or wildlife population to drop
below self-sustaining levels,threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community,reduce the number or restrict the range
of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of California history
or prehistory?
b)Does the project have impacts that are individually ❑
limited,but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively
considerable"means that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when viewed in connection with the
effects of past projects,the effects of other current projects,
and the effects of probable future projects)?
c)Does the project have environmental effects that will ❑
cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,either
directly or indirectly?
DISCUSSION: The project site is an undeveloped commercial infill site,which is currently g bein •
proposed as a
mixed use project with separate commercial building and residential building,consistent with the General Plan and
Zoning Ordinance. The proposed project has been analyzed as required by CEQA. Project-related impacts have
1W6ro2 Page 33 :
ZCH 2000-0008.6340 AIcantara.Larraine Russell.ISMND.sm"
E � °'" V r, CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
been identified and mitigation measures have been included within the proposal to reduce the effect of the proposed
project as described herein.
SOURCES:
General Plan Land Use Element, City of Atascadero,2002
Zoning Ordinance, part of Municipal Code, City of Atascadero,as amended through 1999.
Land Use Element Environmental Impact Report,Crawford, Multari,&Clark,adopted 2002
CEQA Handbook,Air Quality Control District,August 1995
General Plan Safety Element,City of Atascadero,2002
General Plan Circulation Element,2002
General Plan Noise Element,adopted 2002
Acoustical Design Manual, Brown-Buntin Associates, 1991
Noise Ordinance,City of Atascadero, 1992
Guide for Developers,Atascadero Fire Department, 1998 draft
Flood Insurance Rate Map,community-panel number 060700 0003 B, Federal Emergency Management Agency,
January 20, 1982
Trip Generation, Institute of Traffic Engineers
PROJECT-SPECIFIC SOURCES:
Project description includes the following:
■ Vesting Tentative Tract Map/Grading Plan/Site Plan,Sholders Land Survey
■ Floor Plans&Elevations William Torrey,Architect
■ Preliminary Landscape Plan, Omni Design Group
■ Color&Materials Sample Boards,William Torrey,Architect
■ Tree Protection&Tree.Preservation Plan, 1/22/02,Jack Brazeal
• • Tree Protection Plan Revision, 11/9/02,Jack Brazeal
■ Biological Assessment and Wetland Delineation,2/25/02,Morro Group
■ Drainage Analysis,2/22/02, Eric Gobler Civil Engineering
■ Streambed Alteration Notification Review(R3-2001-1071),3/28/02,California Department of Fish&Game
•
11126102 Page 34
09
ZCH 2000-0008.6340 Alcantara.Lorraine RusseILISMNOsm
AJ
XA\A
g
PH. (ack Brazeal's Tree Consultin805)227-6140 •FAX (805) 238-9217 - Contractor's Lie, 619923 4531 SKIPJACK LANE,PASO ROBLES,CALIFORNIA 93446
AMERICAN SOCIETY OF _
CONSULTING ARBORISTS - -
November 09, 2002
Douglas Sholders
Sholders"Land Surveys
6805 Los Gatos Road
Atascadero, CA 93422
Reference Number: 12210I.107
RE: Tree Protection Report @
Tract#2445
6 Lot Subdivision
6340 Alcantara Ave.
Atascadero, California
This letter is to confirm my meeting,Nova 08, 2002, with Steven McHarris (Atascadero
City Planner) in regards to the above listed project.We discussed the corrections listed in
the second project review and the conclusions were as follows:
The Bride:
The proposed bridge is a vital component of this project that will afford access to the lots -
3, 4, & 5 and will also be an attractive feature for this project..
Consequently the location of the bridge site is within the critical root zone area of large
significant trees.
To mitigate detrimental impacts to the adjacent trees the following procedure is
recommended.
The bridge is to be supported by approved installed caissons.
The location of the caissons is to be tested prior to drilling to insure that no major roots
are damaged.
The adjacent trees are to have installed tree trunk protection(2"X4"X8' boards wired
together and secured around the tree trunk prior to bridge construction).
Diagnostics=Tree Protection Plans.-ExpertWitness Service-'Plant Health Care Recommendations
REGISTERED CONSULTING ARBORIST NO.377-CERTIFIED ARBORIST NO.WCISA 0163-TAX No 74R4RR7R 1
• Pg.02Brazeals Tree Consulting November 09, 2002
Sholders/Russel/Tr. 2445
Tecorida Avenue:
Omit the proposed pavers and install asphalt as required.
The sycamore trees along side of this street are well established and healthy.
The proposed pavers would offer no significant improvement nor additional protection for
the root zone area of these trees.
The street improvements as recommended in this revision will have no short or long term '
detriment to the subject sycamore trees.
Other Impacted Trees:
The results.of impacted tree depends upon several factors, such as, tree vigor and vitality,
soil conditions, weather conditions, wind exposure and extent of impact.
The native trees existing on this site are healthy and vigorous due to the almost perfect
environment they are growing in.
. Healthy and vigorous trees are tolerant to significant impacts to the root system but
usually require post-impact remediation(retain natural environment for the root zone area
that is not impacted).
The tree protection fencing, the retained natural environment, the retainer walls and porus
pavers will serve as adequate protection for the impacted trees.
PruPavers:
o s
The'porus pavers are to be installed over a three-inch bed of/4 inch granite covered with
one inch of pea gravel for screeding.
Grub only for the proposed driveway(do riot grade nor compact).
Use pegged curbs to secure the porus pavers.
Pegged curbs are reinforced six to eight curbs poured at grade with a one foot by one foot
pot hole every four to six liner feet.
-
•
Pg.03BNovember 09razeals Tree Consulting ,,2002
Sholders/Russel/Tr. 2445
Discussion:
mity of native trees is always challenging, but the
Developing around or within close proxi
results of developing within the native forest has many positive attributes.
A seasonal creek divides this site. Along the creek and on the West side of the creek, it is
heavily forested with an over-story of large oak and sycamore trees and an under-story of
small oak tree saplings and blackberry vines. The East side of this site is a grassy hill that
is free of brush and under-story but has a few large oak trees around the site perimeter.
All trees appear to be lush,-healthy and growing.
Conclusion:
It is my opinion that the requirements listed in original report along with-this revision.are
adequate for the protection and preservation of the existing trees located on this site.
Jack Brazeal RCA # 377
Registered Consulting Arborist
Tree Protection & Tree Preservation Plan Report
Tract#2445 A Sia Lot Subdivision
6340 Alcantara Avenue
Atascadero, California
Prepared for:
APR 5 2002
Douglas Sholders C01W411JN,
Sholders Land Surveys 7v c�vF�opM�;vr
6805 Los Gatos Road
Atascadero, California
Prepared by:
Jack Brazeal
Jack Brazeal's Tree Consulting
4531 Skipjack Lane
Paso Robles, California
Reference# 1221-01.107
January 22,2002
•
f �
•
SUMMARY
Developing around or within close proximity of native trees is always challenging, but the
results of developing within the native forest has many positive attributes.
This site will be sensitive to development due to the many large and small trees, berry
vines and a seasonal creek. Existing on this site proposed for development are 35 large
and medium size native trees that are to be retained and need to be pruned for structural
strength and crown cleaning. A total of 64 trees are proposed for removal. The vast
majority of these 64 trees are 4 inches or less in diameter.
The 64 small trees and berry vines are to be removed using hand-held tools to avoid
compaction, disruption and other damage to the root systems of the trees to be retained.
When the lot has been cleaned and the trees pruned and the tree protection installed,
inspected and approved, construction may begin.
i •
J� i
• TABLE OF CONTENTS
Summary............................................................................................................. i
Table of Contents.
Assignment........................................................................................................... 1
Limitof Assignment.............................................................................................. 1
Purposeof Report................................................................................................. 1
Observation........................................................................................................... 2
Testing&Analysis................................................................................................ 2
Methodology......................................................................................................... 3
Tree Invento
Tree Protection&Tree Preservation Requirements.............................................. 7-8
Discussion............................................................................................................ 8
Conclusion............................................................................................................ 9
Recommendations................................................................................................. 10
Supporting Information:
SitePhotographs....................................................................................... 11-16
SitePlan..................................................................................................... 17-20
• ll
Pg. I/Brazeal's Tree Consulting 122101.107 •
D. Sholders/Tree Protect. Rpt.
ASSIGNMENT
Prepare a report to address all the native trees on this site that will be impacted by the
proposed development. Included in the report will be recommended mitigation measures
for native tree protection and preservation. All impacted native trees will be inventoried
and listed in the report.
LIMITS OF ASSIGNMENT
Any changes to the original report are to be changed by addendum and may be subject to
additional charges.
PURPOSE OF REPORT
Native tree protection and preservation is required by the City of Atascadero's Native Tree
Regulations and Tree Protection Ordinance.
•
- Flu
Pg. 2Brazeal's Tree Consulting122101.10
•
7
D. Sholders/Tree Protect. Rpt.
OBSERVATION
The general area of this site location is Southeast of Hwy. 41 and Highway 101 freeway, 1
block East of Hwy. 41.
A seasonal creek divides this site. Along the creek and on the West side of the creek, it is
heavily forested with an over-story of large oak and sycamore trees and an under-story of
small oak tree saplings and blackberry vines. The East side of this site is a grassy hill that
is free of brush and under-story but has a few large oak trees around the site perimeter.
All trees appear to be lush, healthy and growing.
TESTING&ANALYSIS
All trees on this site were visually viewed for their. species, size, vigor, vitality, structural
• strength and growing conditions. No climbing for canopy inspection nor excavation for
root crown inspection was performed on any trees on this site.
� l
Pg. 3Brazeal's Tree Consulting •
122101.107
D. Sholders/Tree Protect. Rpt.
METHODOLOGY
Inventory all trees existing on this site for species, size, condition,location and
determination, either save or remove.
All trees on the site are marked with flagging tape. Red flagging tape indicates removal
and green flagging tape indicates trees to be saved/retained.
Prepare tree protection and tree preservation recommendations and requirements for the
native trees required to be saved.
All trees are numbered on the site plan and in the tree protection plan report.
•
• Pg. 4Brazeal's Tree Consulting 122101.107
D. Sholders/Tree Protect. Rpt.
TREE INVENTORY
1. 8", 6" diameter double trunk valley oak tree. Good condition. To be saved.
2. 1011, 18" diameter double trunk valley oak tree. Good condition. To be saved.
3. 7" diameter valley oak tree. Good condition. To be saved.
4. 42" diameter valley oak tree. Good condition. To be saved.
5. 30" diameter sycamore tree. Good condition. To be saved.
6. 6" diameter valley oak tree. Good condition. To be saved.
7. 32" diameter sycamore tree. Good condition. To be saved.
8. 8" diameter valley oak tree. Good condition. To be saved.
9. 8" diameter valley oak tree. Good condition. To be saved.
10. 9" diameter valley oak tree. Good condition. To be saved.
11. 20" diameter valley oak tree. Good condition. To be saved.
12. 6" diameter valley oak tree. Good condition. To be saved.
13 50 diame
• ter valley oak tree. Good condition. To be saved.
(Lot#2)
14. 6" diameter valley oak tree. Good condition. To be saved.
15. 8" diameter valley oak tree. Good condition. To be saved.
16. 5" diameter valley oak tree. Good condition. To be saved.
17. 811, 711, 6", 5" diameter, multi-trunk valley oak tree. Good condition.
To be saved.
• 18. 36" diameter valley oak tree. Good condition. To be saved.
Pg. 5Brazeal's Tree Consulting 122101.107
D. Sholders/Tree Protect. Rpt. •
i
TREE INVENTORY(cont'd)
19. 9 diameter valley oak tree. Good condition. To be saved.
20. 33" diameter valley oak tree. Good condition. To be saved.
21. 24" diameter valley oak tree. Good condition. To be saved.
22. 38", 20" diameter, double trunk valley oak tree. Good condition.
To be saved.
i,
23. 12" diameter valley oak tree. Good condition. To be saved.
24. 4" diameter valley oak tree. Good condition. To be saved.
25. 30" diameter valley oak tree. Good condition. To be saved.
26. 8" diameter valley oak tree. Good condition. To be saved.
27. 4" diameter valley oak tree. Good condition. To be saved.
28. 3" diameter valley oak tree. Good condition. To be saved.
29. 18" diameter valley oak tree. Good condition. To be saved.
30. 14" diameter valley oak tree. Good condition. To be saved.
31. 8" diameter valley oak tree. Good condition. To be saved.
NOTE: The 31 trees to be saved are to be protected and preserved by the
following tree protection and tree preservation measures listed in this
report. -
IIIA :IConsulting 122101,107
D. olrazeal�s Tree Consu g
ders/Tree Protect. Rpt.
TREE INVENTORY (cont'd)
NOTE: These 4 large sycamore trees are located off-site but will require
tree trunk protection the same as the on-site trees.
32. 48" diameter sycamore tree. Good condition. To be saved.
33. 30" diameter sycamore tree. Good condition. To be saved.
34. 48" diameter sycamore tree. Good condition. To be saved.
35. 48" diameter sycamore tree. Good condition. To be saved.
Isite has many under-story trees and the majority are proposed to be removed. These
are not plotted on the site plan but are flagged in the field for removal.
The diameter of these small under-story valley oak trees are:
18, 14, 4, 4, 4, 3, 4, 2,2,4, 3, 5, 4, 4, 3, 6, 5, 3, 5, 5, 4,4, 3, 4, 4, 3, 5, 4, 2, 3, 3, 4, 6, 3,
4, 3, 3, 3, 2, 4, 2, 3,2, 3, 2, 2, 4,2,2, 3, 3, 2, 3, 4, 5, 2, 3, 3, 2, 3,4,4, 4, 4.
The total diameters of the above 64 small under-story valley oak trees is 244 inches.
•
Pg. 9Brazeal's Tree Consulting 122101.107 •
D. Sholders/Tree Protect. Rpt.
CONCLUSIONS
1. This site will be sensitive to develop due to the existing environmental
conditions.
2. The intent for tree preservation on this site is to retain and protect the
"over-story" (large, significant native trees) and remove most of the "under-story"
(small sapling trees).
3. Protection for these trees can be obtained by following the requirements listed in
this report.
•
122
• Pg. l OBrazeal's Tree Consulting 122101.107
D. Sholders/Tree Protect. Rpt.
RECOMA ENDATIONS
1. Follow all the requirements and all the guidelines of this report and the guidelines
of the " City of Atascadero's Native Tree Regulations, Ordinance No. 350.'°
(Avaiable at the planning dept.)
2. Three site inspections are recommended for tract requirements compliance.
#I. After lot cleaning and tree pruning, but before tree protection and
fence installation.
#2. After the tree protection and tree protection fence installation.
#3. Just after project completion and before any occupancy permits are
issued.
•
Jack Brazeal
Registered Certified Arborist
t
i
i
i ,
1Tri��� �-�y�•tr �#'�►� T' '`}�T ��r 1 E ;g �, � `• ,r* !' r' 2 � s
`' �t � :� r � r; � Yr ;l � 3t Fl }I _t sir Y-`� , -�• l
rt-iM
y�i , <
qp-4
�� r �id• a� i T t
A�-
►ems; � r ISp i�'�f i�� ( t� t+.r ,� �Piq, t .• 'b
.i�iii'K, p}' •t'/rY i b:,"r" � -�I it¢$c(iy.x irk `tet► y t.F <I�,i j'4 t Rye".j' "zt '1W. a,��i --�
r4�� � I r i.d��i ��Tw � )!s�, b ►!t ��, � .�� ♦isy ► �' ��r-iii ;l�i•.YcQ;t��f� g. f i
,►'-I
t
1'tt �-,s 1Z*'yw. �' w }!� i• a• � t 3 iC ) �iy* T.�k� V-1
t' ir, Si 4f < -`•< f v--- d ..i ► < Yi ��p1-e�i (, si� _;:� 3
;i Yr is. f ► r j t �' ! &;,.. Y.y,�..lRti.� a. �_:
R1'aa�iT TK` •f yyy��� 3•a-+
F i 1 i 3 d s tQQQ� `� k 1.1 :r,6
}" t- ii } Ori" E�� "%r`y� �i A°+g+4 ,jf., w ea r►11r a �? -
a .- r r . 1•. `�` id��1 {*� r � } 9, �" r« it <id fTL�'t, l t
- •}• r Ir. ' 4 ft � }s. ';� rlr i!I��'i - S� N � 6] a- � •� f ,
JM
i.&'}<f,4 s'{ 11
rya,? � ;`T'3 k y �>} Y<`-. •�
r ��� i�����+ 7 d rc�i i�''' 3 •< r,c �.z��'4 " r4 ��
L= { :�t �ti�•- .mil{:; is
i 1
1 ' I •
ems. '*Iit � Y► "! 21, �f �j�+ME44
-`'t it 3'� I �AjX
?jj i ',� ..`}� \ -1}t 1 -!r.;1• �`y'' j' ,}�i 1 's
it. jIV
l
!• • . 1 L •
lit-
-s* Y��t>i j� i'i�i►�� � �}� ���; �hw�;i, zi 4 �� ; 0
\v7
Yj
ek
f j s a
1 � 1 •
•
1 1
A
�.y �k�� '��a�` �t+\ ����. �f ♦ � i Jay.•_ !�'!,f!?��A
.�=C�� �j``�'R` �-��li `� � '�•, , tilcrt�afr� its '�r �� !�
EFS' i S ! ,S• � I
1 �P' : t �_ j i :• 'h �`„# *�!`
:v a 1s i ;1J 'A
A
` tti 1. sN "j_rte:
fir
• i
4" �� , � � t � ��� .n: �� � • _ fit cw
lk
�`-M. •.::- 'moi:""�If�..i���yJ i v+r� s �f rli •�'. - -
f 1
1 1 1 11 1 1 • '
i
• a
all
ly
MV
FW
C
!Jr�a'� �v. bf '•�, a �, j t x ��ei ,i� � '� s� �'i=� j �a--„� _
h
Rrriar,.Sq
1 1 1 1 • 1 � � �
f
- '�':r':•.-►t: _ .4w' �Vis..;��,�-,
syr
U
i
� • 1 1
� 11 '
Pg. 17/13razeal's Tree Consulting •
D. Sholders/Tree Protect. Rpt. 122101.107
rp
SITE LOCATION
TRACT 2445
A SIX LOT SUBDIVISION
6340 ALCANTARA AVENUE
ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA
•
E
• Pg. 18BrazeaPs Tree Consulting 122101.107
D. Sholders/Tree Protect. Rpt.
qo Lao
43
V • 'Y
J Sym.
�E
L DT
o 2 fjAN "O"Tli Z7
0 ' P4ANj5,YAV64 AR
NEW LrYJti':• CHOICE m 0. y VERP�A/A y OYRACAN
e\Sk! ' WOMIX/HAWrHORHB
-
d,
1 r
G AW
4%
SITE PLAN
TRACT 2445
A SIX LOT SUBDIVISION
• 6340 ALCANTARA AVENUE
ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA
Pg. 19Brazeal's Tree Consulting •
D. Sholders/Tree Protect. Rpt. 122101.107
49- SAO
5yv
�a ►a 7YP. L /G.4cE5:
�aLot✓ItirG P". r SH
HisC: 3uuiPERI
- - a-" "" " dGEtitIGL�R� 57iQAlJ9BRRY Gv
".•. ....� �:- --'-��P/RACA.U7iiif.:j-�itSM/LA;'O,Q
TAU r • _ _
S
60 _ LOT
' Z•
1 R A,V •
/ °y-W°
.Q
mi •-4•�RKS w� :.
H 3�'
,, SYG. - l✓
o
LOT 6
• Vu
2 `- PLAN ..�.•
0• 29 s 7YP. Z P6ACS5:
�- !-�.�°. OLANj3N.fu65 ARO(lNl7 _•
NEVI N:GHO/CE G#�.
SITE PLAN
TRACT 2445
A SIX LOT SUBDIVISION
6340 ALCANTARA AVENUE
ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA,
J2
• Pg. 20Brazeal's Tree Consulting 122101.107
D. Sholders/Tree Protect. Rpt.
GOT 11 / • w°
�o
W° LPA
.� a pV
LOT Z
K
J�V"
\ L O T 3
.00 RAN A" F1ZSE �ti1`
•_�q So•w (�
oq►c5 3�,V 0 /� � -
Q•J° �i .wo W
i"'
z
LOT ¢ ti4
6
• „yv o QaK
27 A
Z9 . rYP:2 PcAcEs
P4ANr5NRvf35 AROLAW
Wo NEG(/Lf�il/y�:CHOICE Cf�
L'ERZ£NA, PYRAGAN7fls�,
/AIO(AN HAWMOAN8 Hoe _
LAW✓ LOT * - wa
PLAN'6"�{EYERS� 36
N64<�.�6
SITE PLAN
TRACT 2445
A SIX LOT SUBDIVISION
• 6340 ALCANTARA AVENUE
ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA
3
! J
'TAT OF CA IFORNIA THE R=SOURCES AG. �Y
DEP RTMENT OF FISH AND GAME
CENTRAL COAST REGION GRAY DAVIS GOVERNOR
(707)944-5520
Mailing address: RECEIVED
POST OFFICE BOX 47 •
YOUNTVILL.E CALIFORNIA 94599
Street address:
7329 SILVERADO TRAIL APR 1 .5 2002
NAPA CALIFORNIA 94558
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
March 28, 2002
Ms. Phyllis Russell Notification Number: R.1-2001-1071
Post Office Box 257 '
Atascadero, California 93422
Dear Ms.Russell:
Results of a Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement g ment Notification Review
We have received and evaluated your Notification of Lake or Streambed Alteration a
determined that it was complete. Using the information from your attached descrition p ckage and
questionnaire, we have determined the following: P , plans, maps, and
The possibility of substantial impacts from this project as described is unlikely or the activity is outside
the jurisdiction of the Department under Section 1600 et. seq. of the Fish and Game Code'
If you conduct your project as described in the Notification, no Streambed Alteration Agreement is
required. Please be advised that a permit or California Environmental Quality Act CEQA
Project may be required by another agency. ( Q ) review of your
The statements below are designed to ensure compliance with other sectio
If your project will not comply with these statements, please contact the Departmentns of the Fish and Game Code.
Alteration Agreement. to obtain a Streambed
All work in the stream or.lake shall be confined to Tune 15to October 15,'2002.
No equipment will be operated in live (wet) stream channels.
Any runoff from steep, erodible surfaces will be diverted so as not t
o enter the stream or
catchment basins, erosion control mats, hay bales, fabric fences, or other appropriate mea lake. Sediment
when such diversions are necessary. ns shall be used
' Wash water containing mud or silt from aggregate ate washing or other operations shall not be allowed to
enter a lake or flowing stream.
Structures and associated materials not designed to withstand high se
areas above the high water mark before such flows occur. asonal flows shall be removed to
i
I
t
Ms.Phyllis Russell
March 28,2002
Page 2
No debris, soil, silt, sand, bark, slash, sawdust, rubbish, cement or concrete or washings
petroleum products or other organic or earthen material from an to thereof
e , oil or
Y logging, construction, or associated
activity of whatever nature shall be allowed to enter into or placed where it may be washed
by
runoff into waters of the State. When operations are completed, any excess materials og water
debris
rainfall or
removed from the work area. No rubbish shall be deposited within 150 feet of the high shall be
any stream or lake. teerr mark off
RETAINA COPY OF THIS LETTER AND YOUR ATTA
THE WORK SITE AND PRO FIDE TO DEPARTMENT REPRESEN CI-IED T�E F R TION P`9 CKA CE AT
EQ VESTED.
Thank you for taking time to notify the Department. If you have any questions, lease c
Office Technician, at(707)0944-5520.
p all Sandy Brunson,
Sincerely,
/y L
1Robert 16loerke
• Regional Manager
Central Coast Region
cc: Wdn.Sparks
Lt.Sterbinsky
Mike Hill
City Council Draft Ordinance A
March 11,2003
Page 4 of 4
• ATTACHMENT 4: Draft Ordinance A
PD-7 Master Plan of Development(CUP 2000-0024)/ZCH2O00-0008
Approval of Proposed Zoning Map Change
DRAFT ORDINANCE A
A ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO APPROVING
ZONE CHANGE 2000-0008,AMENDING THE ZONING MAP DISTRICT OF APN
030-029-065 FROM RMF-10 TO RMF-10/PD-7 OVERLAY DISTRICT SUBJECT
TO A MASTER PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT.
(6340 Alcantara Avenue/Russell)
WHEREAS, an application has been received from Lorraine Russell (PO Box 257,
Atascadero, CA 93423) Applicant and Property Owner to consider a project consisting of a
zone change from RMF-10 (Residential Multi-Family)to RMF-10/PD-7 (Residential Multi-
Family with Planned Development Overlay #7) with the adoption of a Master Plan of
Development, and a six lot residential Tentative Tract Map on APN 030-292-065; and,
WHEREAS, an Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration 2002-0049
were prepared for the project and made available for public review in accordance with the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA); and,
• WHEREAS,the site's vested General Plan Designation is MDR(Medium Density
Residential); and,
WHEREAS,the site's vested zoning district is RMF-10 (Residential Multiple-
Family); and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that it is in the best interest of
the City to enact this amendment to the Zoning Map to protect the health, safety and welfare
of its citizens by applying orderly development of the City and allowing for the creation of
common open space areas; and,
WHEREAS, the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and public notice of
environmental documents, as set forth in the State and local guidelines for implementation of
the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) have been adhered to; and,
WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed Public Hearing upon the subject Zone
Change application was held by the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero at which
hearing evidence, oral and documentary, was admitted on behalf of said zoning amendments;
and,
WHEREAS,the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, at a Public Hearing
• held on November 5, 2002, studied and considered Zone Change 2000-0008, after first
studying and considering the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project,
and,
J
City Council Draft Ordinance A
March 11,2003
Page 5 of 4
WHEREAS, the Atascadero City Council, at a Public Hearing held on December 10, •
2002, studied and considered Zone Change 2000-0008, after first studying and considering
the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project, and,
NOW,THEREFORE,the City Council takes the following actions:
SECTION 1. Findings for Approval of a Zone Change Creating a PD-7 Planned
Development Overlay District. The Planning Commission finds as follows:
1. Modification of development standards or processing requirements is warranted
to promote orderly and harmonious development.
2. Modification of development standards or processing requirements will enhance
the opportunity to best utilize special characteristics of an area and will have a
beneficial effect on the area.
3. Benefits derived from the overlay zone cannot be reasonably achieved through
existing development standards or processing requirements.
4. Proposed plans offer certain redeeming features to compensate for the requested
modification including: (a) no disturbance to the on-site seasonal creek; (b) each
unit will have a private yard area that will allow for outdoor recreational
opportunities; (c) architectural and landscape features of the project have been
designed to enhance the project's appearance and benefit the surrounding
neighborhood; (d) much of the paved private driveway will incorporate special •
paving treatment; and (e) the project will provide one moderate deed-restricted
affordable housing unit.
SECTION 2. Approval. The Atascadero City Council, in a regular session
assembled on March 11, 2003 resolved to introduce for first reading an ordinance that would
rezone the subject site consistent with the following:
1. Exhibit A: Zone Change Map
SECTION 3. Effective Date.
This ordinance shall be effective a 12:01 a.m. on the 31St day after its final passage.
•
City Council Draft Ordinance A
March 11,2003
Page 6 of 4
• On motion by Council Member , and seconded by Council Member
the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ADOPTED:
By:
Jerry L. Clay, Sr., Mayor
Attest:
Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk
Approved as to form:
Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney
•
A rl V
J
City Council Draft Ordinance A
March 11,2003
Page 7 of 4
Exhibit A: Zone Change Map-ZCH 2000-0008 •
10
Official Zoning Map Change
APN 030-292-065
\\\ Existing Zone: RMF-10
Amended Zone: RMF-10/PD-7
V2 \
tM
�0
y�
kin
El
t�
10
ATTACHMENT 5: Draft Resolution B
. PD-7 Master Pian of Development(CUP 2000-0024)/ZCH2O00-0008
Approval of Proposed Master Plan of Development
DRAFT RESOLUTION B
A RESOLUTION OF THE ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL APPROVING A
MASTER PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2000-0024)
FOR A PD-7 OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICT ON APN 030-029-065
(6340 Alcantara Avenue/Russell)
WHEREAS, an application has been received from Lorraine Russell (PO Box 2579
Atascadero, CA 93423) Applicant and Property Owner to consider a project consisting of a
zone change from RMF-10 (Residential Multi-Family) to RMF-10/PD-7 (Residential Multi-
Family with Planned Development Overlay #7) with the adoption of a Master Plan of
Development, and a six lot residential Tentative Tract Map on APN 030-292-065; and,
WHEREAS, the site's vested General Plan Designation is MDR(Medium-Density
Residential); and,
WHEREAS,the site's vested zoning district is RMF-10 (Residential Multiple-
Family); and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended that a site be rezoned to a
PD-7 overlay district which requires the adoption of a Master Plan of Development; and,
WHEREAS,the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and public notice of
environmental documents, as set forth in the State and local guidelines for implementation of
the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)have been adhered to; and,
WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed Public Hearing upon the subject Zone
Change application was held by the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero at which
hearing evidence, oral and documentary, was admitted on behalf of said Master Plan of
Development; and,
WHEREAS,the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, at a duly noticed
Public Hearing held on Tuesday, January 21, 2003, studied and considered the Master Plan
of Development(CUP 2000-0024), after first studying and considering the Proposed
Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project, and
WHEREAS, the Atascadero City Council, at a Public Hearing held on March 11,
2003, studied and considered the Master Plan of Development for Zone Change 2000-00089
after first studying and considering the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the
project, and,
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council takes the following actions:
SECTION 1. Findings for Approval of Master Plan of Development. The City •
Council finds as follows:
1. The proposed project or use is consistent with the General Plan and the City's
Appearance Review Manual; and,
2. The proposed project or use satisfies all applicable provisions of the Title
(Zoning Ordinance) including the PD-7 Ordinance; and,
3. The establishment, and subsequent operation or conduct of the use will not,
because of the circumstances and conditions applied in the particular case, be
detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of the general public or persons
residing or working in the neighborhood of the use, or be detrimental or injurious
to property or improvements in the vicinity of the use; and,
4. That the proposed project or use will not be inconsistent with the character or
the immediate neighborhood or contrary to its orderly development; and,
5. That the proposed use or project will not generate a volume of traffic beyond
the safe capacity of all roads providing access to the project, either existing or to
be improved in conjunction with the project, or beyond the normal traffic volume
of the surrounding neighborhood that would result from full development in
accordance with the Land Use Element.
SECTION 2. Approval. The Atascadero City Council, in a regular session
assembled on March 11, 2003, resolved to approve Conditional Use Permit 2000-0024, a
Master Plan of Development for Zone Change 2000-0008 subject to the following:
1. EXHIBIT A: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL/MITIGATION MONITORING
PROGRAM
2. EXHIBIT B: SITE PLAN
3. EXHIBIT C: STATISTICAL SUMMARY OF PROJECT
4. EXHIBIT D: LANDSCAPE PLAN
5. EXHIBIT E: GRADING& DRAINAGE
6. EXHIBIT F: ELEVATIONS &FLOOR PLANS
7. EXHIBIT G: ELEVATIONS/COLOR AND MATERIALS
•
` f 41
On motion by Council Member , and seconded by Council Member
. the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ADOPTED:
By:
Jerry L. Clay, Sr., Mayor
Attest:
Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk
Approved as to form:
Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney
' 112
m
EXHIBIT A:Conditions of Approval/Mitigation Monitoring Program
PD-7 Master Plan of Development(CUP 2000-0024)/ZCH2O00-0008 •
Conditions of Approval/ 'riming Responsibility Mitigation
Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure
PS:Planning Services
BL'Business license BS:Building Services
66340 Alcantara Avenue GP:Grading Perri* FD:FireDepartrnent
BP:Building g Permit PD:Police Deparhnent
PD-7 Master Plan of Development Fl:Finallnspe*n CE:Cily Engineer
TO:Terrvorary Occupancy rCUP 2000-00241ZCH 2000-0008 FO:Final Occupancy CkUyAflorney
Planning Services
1. The approval of this use permit shall become final and PS
effective following City Council approval.
2. Approval of this Master Plan of Development shall be valid FM PS
concurrently with the life of Tentative Tract Map 2001-
0011 and then indefinitely following final map. The Master
Plan of Development approval shall expire and become
null and void unless a final map is recorded consistent
with the Master Plan of Development.
3. Changes to the Master Plan of Development shall be On-going PS
approved by the Planning Commission and do not require •
Council action.
4. The Community Development Department shall have the BP/FM PS
authority to approve the following minor changes to the
project the(1)modify the site plan project by less than
10%,(2)result in a superior site design or appearance,
and/or(3)address a construction design issue that is not
substantive to the Master Plan of Development. The
Planning Commission shall have the final authority to
approve any other changes to the Master Plan of
Development and any associated Tentative Maps.
5. All subsequent Tentative Tract Maps and construction BP/FM PS
permits shall be consistent with the Master Plan of
Development contained herein.
6. All exterior elevations,finish materials and colors shall be BP PS
consistent with the Master Plan of Development as shown
in Exhibit F and Exhibit G with the following modifications:
a. Each front elevation,and entire side elevations(lots 1
&6)visible from Tecorida Avenue shall incorporate
an applied masonry material such as brick or stone
along the lower building base,subject to staff
approval. This treatment shall return along side
elevations to a logical terminus point such as a side
yard fence,chimney or doorway.
b. Front entry porch columns on each elevation shall be
further detailed with use of applied masonry material
such as brick or stone. The use of wood timbers may
. � � 3
Conditions of Approval/ riming Responsibility Mitigation
• Mitigation Monitoring Program
/Monitoring Measure
PS:Planning Services
BL:Business License BS:Building Services
66340 Alcantara Avenue GP:GradingPem9t FD:FireDepatrient
BP:Budding Penrd PD:Police DWartnent
PD-7 Master Plan of Development FI:Final Inspection CE City Engineer
TO:Temporary Occupancy WWI.Wastewater
CUP 2000-0024/ZCH 2000-0008 FD:Final Occupancy CAcaynttoney
also be incorporated into the column design as
appropriate,subject to staff approval.
c. Each house shall incorporate the use of double or
single hung windows,transom windows,and window
shutters,subject to staff approval.
d. The garage door color of each new home shall match
the house body color.
7. All site development shall be consistent with the maximum BP/FM PS
intensities described in the statistical project summary as
shown on EXHIBIT C.
8. All site work,grading and site improvements shall be BP/FM PS
consistent with the Master Plan of Development as shown
in EXHIBIT B, D and E.
9. Native oaks trees shall be preserved and protected during BP PS
construction unless approved for removal.
Tree protection shall be in place prior to the issuance of
any construction permits and the arborist shall be under
contract to monitor tree protection.
10. A final landscape and irrigation plan shall be approved BP PS
prior to the issuance of building permits and included as
part of site improvement plan consistent with EXHIBIT D.
All exterior meters,air conditioning units and mechanical
equipment shall be screened with landscape material.
Trash/recycle container areas shall be screened with
fencing or landscape.
All front yards and areas between Tecorida Avenue and
lots 1 and 6 shall be landscaped by the developer. All
landscape maintenance shall be the responsibility of the
individual property owner.
The five front yard trees shall be 24-inch box native trees.
In addition,two additional 15-gallon trees shall trees shall
be planted along Tecorida Avenue and four additional 15-
gallon native sycamore trees be planted between the
creek and the private driveway between lot 4 and 5.
11. All project fencing shall be installed consistent with BP PS
EXHIBIT D subject to the following modifications.
a. The yards adjacent to Tecorida Avenue shall not be
enclosed with any fencing which exceeds Veet in
height.
• b. No fences in the rear yards adjoining the on-site
creek shall exceed Veet in height.
' 4
Conditions of Approval/ Timing Responsibility Mitigation
Mitigation Monitoring Program
/Monitoring Measure •
PS:Planning Services
BL Business License BS:Building Services
66340 Alcantara Avenue GP:GradingPemiit FD:Fire Departnent
BR Building Permit PD:Police Departnent
PD-7 Master Plan of Development Fl:Finallnspecton CE City Engineer
TO:Temporary Occupancy WW:Wastawat:r
CUP 2000-0024/ZCH 2000-0008 FO:Final Occupancy CA Citywmmey
c. The design of all fencing shall be compatible with the
overall project design,subject to staff approval
12. Retaining wall design&material shall match or GP PS
compliment the texture and color of the primary residence. BP
In addition,the retaining wall located within the front yard
of lots 3 and 4 shall be rounded or angled back toward lot
4,subject to staff approval.
13. Provisions for on-site circulation reciprocal access GP PS
between the adjacent westerly property shall be required BP
at the location identified on the site plan.
14. Apply the following tree mitigation: (Mitigation Fee GP PS
Table)
Evergreen Native Trees(inches) Deciduous Native Trees(inches) Totals
dbh notes dbh notes
1 0-inches 1 244-inches 64 white oak trees
2 2 0-inches ranging in size from
3 3 0-inches 2-18 inches
4 4 0-inches •
5 5 0-inches
6 0-inches
7 0-inches
6 8 0-inches
Total 0-inches Total 244-inches 244-inches
Mitigation Requirement
req'd tree replacements: 0 five gal trees req'd tree replacements: 81 five gal trees 81 five gal trees
Proposed Replanting 0 five gal trees Proposed Replanting 9 five gal trees 9 five gal trees
0 box trees(24") 5 box trees(24") 5 box trees(24")
Remaining Mitigation 0 five gal trees Remaining Mitigation 62 five gal trees 62 five gal trees
oror
Tree Fund Payment: $ - Tree Fund Payment: $ 3,116.67 $ 3,116.67
15. One unit shall be reserved as deed restricted affordable FM,BP PS,CE
unit affordable unit in the moderate category for a
period of 7 years.
Building Services
16. A soils investigation prepared by a licensed BP FM
Geotechnical Engineer is to be provided for the •
project. The report is to be provided at the time of
building permit submittal along with the building plans
. _, 5
Conditions of Approval/ Timing Responsibility Mitigation
• Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure
PS:Planning Services
BL Business license BS:Building Sermm
66340 Alcantara Avenue GP*.GradngPermit FD:FireDepartrnent
BP:Building Permit PD:Police Department
PD-7 Master Plan of Development Fl:Finallrspecbon CECAI Engineer
TO:Temporary Occupancy WW:Wastewater
CUP 2000-0024/ZCH 2000-0008 FO:Final Occupancy CA City Attorney
for review by the Building Division.
Recommendations contained in the report are to be
incorporated into the project plans.
Fire Marshal
17. Dimension the width of driveway. A minimum 16' BP BS
paved with 20'total width access with a minimum
head clearance of 13'-6"is to be provided to each
building location. Access drives with slopes less than
12%are to have an all-weather surface. Access
drives with slopes equal to or greater than 12%are to
be paved.
18. Show location of existing and any proposed fire BP BS
hydrants. As presented,the project requires one fire
hydrant located within 250 feet of any point along the
front property boundary.
19. Provide a letter from the Atascadero Mutual Water BP BS
Company stating the minimum expected water
available to the site. Amount available must meet
min. requirement specified in the California Fire Code.
. 20. Note approved address signage is to be provided. BP BS
21. Note on plans that fire lanes shall be delineated to BP BS
restrict parking as required by the Fire Authority.
22. Access drive where it bridges the creekway is to be BP BS
designed and maintained to the satisfaction of the
Public Works department to support a minimum
40,000 lb. Imposed load at 25 miles per hour for fire
apparatus.
City Engineer
Standard Conditions
23. Public frontage improvements, on site grading and GP,BP CE
drainage plans and the driveway plans shall be
produced by a registered civil engineer. The plans
shall be in the form required in the City of Atascadero
Engineering Standards. The plans will be reviewed
and approved by the City Engineer.
24. All public improvements shall be constructed in GP,BP CE
conformance with the City of Atascadero Engineering
Department Standard Specifications and Drawings or
as directed by the City Engineer.
25. The applicant shall enter into a Plan Check & GP,BP CE
Inspection agreement with the City.
26. The applicant shall be responsible for the protection, GP, BP CE
relocation and/or alteration of existing utilities.
27. The applicant shall install all new utilities (water, gas, GP, BP CE
• electric,cable TV and telephone)underground.
28. The applicant shall monument all property corners for GP,BP CE
construction control and shall promptly replace them
1C
Conditions of Approval/ Timing Responsibility Mitigation
Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure
PS:Planning Services
BL Business License BS:Buildng Services
66340 Alcantara Avenue GP:.GrWing Peanit FD:Fire Depatnent
81".Buidng Pwr t PD:Police Depatient
PD-7 Master Plan of Development A:Final Inspection CE:City Engineer
CUP 2000-0024/ZCH 2000-0008 FQFinapacyocc�ancy w-CitiAwastewater
F0:Final Occupancy CA City P,gomey
if disturbed.
29. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant GP, BP CE
shall submit a grading and drainage plan with a
separate sheet(s) devoted to sedimentation and
erosion control, prepared by a registered civil
engineer for review and approval by the City
Engineer.
30. Prior to the final inspection,all outstanding plan check GP,BP CE
and inspection fees shall be paid.
31. Prior to the final inspection, the applicant shall submit GP,BP CE
a written statement from a registered civil engineer
that all work has been completed and is in full
compliance with the approved plans and the Uniform
Building Code(UBC).
32. Prior to recording the Tract Map, the applicant shall GP, BP CE
submit a map drawn in substantial conformance with
the approved tentative map and in compliance with all
conditions set forth herein. The map shall be
submitted for review and approval by the City in
accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the
City's Subdivision Ordinance.
33. In the event that the applicant is allowed to bond for GP,BP CE
any public improvements required as a condition of •
this map, the applicant shall enter into a Subdivision
Improvement Agreement with the City Council. An
engineer's estimate of probable cost shall be
submitted for review and approval by the City
Engineer to determine the amount of the bond. The
Subdivision Improvement Agreement shall record
concurrently with the Final Map.
34. A preliminary subdivision guarantee shall be GP, BP CE
submitted for review in conjunction with the
processing of the Tract Map.
35. The final map shall be signed by the City Engineer GP,BP CE
prior to the map being placed on the agenda for City
Council acceptance.
36. Prior to recording the Tract Map, the applicant shall GP, BP CE
pay all outstanding plan check/inspection fees.
37. Prior to recording the Tract Map, the applicant shall GP, BP CE
set monuments at all new property corners. A
registered civil engineer or licensed land surveyor
shall indicate by certificate on the parcel map, that
corners have been set or shall be set by a date
specific and that they will be sufficient to enable the
survey to be retraced.
38. All existing and proposed utility, pipeline, open space, GP,BP CE
or other easements are to be shown on the Tract
Map. If there are building or other restrictions related
to the easements, they shall be noted on the
final/parcel map. The applicant shall show all access
restrictions on the final/parcel map.
39. Prior to recording the parcel map, the applicant shall GP,BP CE •
have the map reviewed by all applicable public and
private utility companies (cable, telephone, gas,
electric, Atascadero Mutual Water Company). The
Conditions of Approval/ Timing Responsibility Mitigation
• Mitigation Monitoring Program
/Monitoring Measure
PS:Planning Services
BL Business License BS:Building Services
66340 Alcantara Avenue GP:Wing Pan* FD:Fire Departnent
BP:Building Pertrit PD:Police Department
PD-7 Master Plan of Development Fl:Final Inspection CE-Oily Engineer
TO:Temporary Occupancy WW:Wastewalier
CUP 2000-00242CH 2000-0008 FO:Final Occupancy CA,CAynttomey
applicant shall obtain a letter from each utility
company indicating their review of the map. The
letter shall identify any new easements that may be
required by the utility company. A copy of the letter
shall be submitted to the City. New easements shall
be shown on the parcel map.
40. Prior to the issuance of building permits the applicant GP,BP CE
shall submit plans and supporting calculations/reports
including street improvements,underground utilities,
composite utilities,and grading/drainage plans
prepared by a registered civil engineer for review and
approval by the City Engineer.
City Engineer
Site Specific Conditions
41. This project is required to pave Tecorida Ave, with GP,BP CE
Curb, Gutter, and Sidewalk on the east side, from the
end of the existing paving on the south side of the
project to the end of the existing paving (at the
barricade) for orderly development and traffic
circulation. The length of this paving is approximately
• 128 feet. The sidewalk will require additional setback
onto the project site to avoid impacts to the existing
trees and shall require granting of access easement.
to be approved with the final map by the City
Engineer
42. Frontage improvements required are curb and gutter GP,BP CE
on the east side of Tecorida Ave and concrete drive
approach or concrete cross gutter at the driveway to
allow the drainage to be conveyed down Tecorida.
43. Public Sanitary Sewer shall be extended from GP,BP CE
property line to property line.
44. Final project inspection shall be contingent upon GP,BP CE
completion of the public sewer extension and Public
Works final inspection. A City of Atascadero Sewer
Extension Performance Agreement shall be
executed.
45. Applicant shall pay sewer Extension Fees for five (5) GP,BP CE
newly created lots and Connection fees upon
issuance of building permit. Sewer connection
permits shall be issued separately from building
permit after public sewer extension has been
completed and has received a satisfactory final Public
Works inspection. Each building shall be separately
and independently connected with the public sewer.A
backflow valve shall protect sewer piping serving
fixtures which have flood level rims located below the
elevation of the next upstream manhole (or cleanout)
cover.
Atascadero Mutual Water Company
• 46. Prior to recordation of the final map, the applicant GP,BP CE
shall submit plans for review and approval by AMWC
for all existinq and proposed water distribution
m
3
Conditions of Approval/ Timing Responsibility Mitigation
Mitigation Monitoring Program
/Monitoring Measure •
PS:Planning Services
BL:Business license BS:Building Services
66340 Alcantara Avenue GP:GradingPeard FD:FireDepartinerd
BP:Building PemB PD:Ponce Departrnent
PD-7 Master Plan of Development Fl:FlndInspeclion DE City Engineer
TO:Tenporay Occupancy WW:Wastewater
CUP 2000-0024/ZCH 2000-0008 FO:Final Occuparq CA*cayAWney
facilities that provide water service to the proposed
lots. All new water distribution facilities shall be
constructed in conformance with Atascadero Mutual
Water Company Standards.
47. Prior to the issuance of building permits,the applicant GP, BP CE
shall obtain a "Will Serve" letter from the Atascadero
Mutual Water Company for the newly created lots.
48. Prior to the start of construction, the applicant shall GP,BP CE
pay all installation and connection fees required by
the Atascadero Mutual Water Company,or enter in to
a"deferred connection"agreement.
49. Private easements may be needed for the private GP, BP CE
water service lines that serve parcels which do not
front on Tecorida Road.
50. Water meters located on Tecorida Ave for Lots 1 and GP, BP CE
6 are in acceptable location. Meters for newly created
Lots 3, 4 & 5 need to be located on frontage of road
at Tecorida Ave and private utility easements
provided for private service lines to parcels.
Mitigation Measures
Mitigation Measure 1.c.1: All lighting shall be designed to BP PS 1.c.1
eliminate any off site glare. All exterior site lights shall utilize •
full cut-off,"hooded"lighting fixtures to prevent offsite light
spillage and glare. Any luminaire pole height shall not exceed
30-feet in height,limit intensity to 2.0 foot candles at ingress
/egress,and otherwise 0.6 foot candle minimum to 1.0
maximum in parking areas. Fixtures shall be shield cut-off
type.
Mitigation Measure 1.c.2: The project landscape shall include BP PS U.2
requiring one 24-inch box sized tree within the front yard of
each new residence.
Mitigation Measure 3.b: The project shall be conditioned to BP BS 3.b
comply with all applicable District regulations pertaining to the
control of fugitive dust(PM-10)as contained in section 6.4 of
the Air Quality Handbook. All site grading and demolition
plans notes shall list the following regulations:
A. All material excavated or graded shall be sufficiently
watered to prevent excessive amounts of dust. Watering
shall occur at least twice daily with complete coverage,
preferably in the late morning and after work is finished for
the day.
B. All clearing,grading,earth moving,or excavation activities
shall cease during periods of high winds(i.e.greater than
20 mph averaged over one hour)so as to prevent
excessive amounts of dust.
C. All material transported off-site shall be either sufficiently
watered or securely covered to prevent excessive
amounts of dust.
D. The area disturbed by clearing, grading,earth moving,or
excavation operations shall be minimized so as to prevent
excessive amounts of dust. •
E. Permanent dust control measured identified in the
approved project reve etation and landscape plans shall
, 9
Conditions of Approval/ Timing Responsibility Mitigation
• Mitigation Monitoring Program
/Monitoring Measure
PS:Planning Services
BL:Business License BS:Building Services
66340 Alcantara Avenue GP:GradingPertnit FD:FireDepartrnent
BP:Building Pernit PD:Pdlce Department
PD-7 Master Plan of Development FI:Final Inspection CE City Engineer
Mr.Tempway Occupancy WW:Wastewater
CUP 2000-0024/ZCH 2000-0008 FO.Final Oocupancy CA C4 ftmey
be implemented as soon as possible following completion
of any soil disturbing activities.
F. Exposed ground areas that are planned to be reworked at
dates greater than one month after initial grading shall be
sown with fast-germinating native grass seed and watered
until vegetation becomes established.
G. All disturbed areas not subject to revegetation shall be
stabilized using approved chemical soil binders,jute
netting,or other methods in advance by the APCD.
H. All roadways,driveways, sidewalks, etc.to be paved shall
be completed as soon as possible. In addition, structural
foundations shall be completed as soon as possible
following building pad construction.
I. On-site vehicle speed shall be limited to 15 mph for any
unpaved surface.
J. All unpaved areas with vehicle traffic shall be watered at
least twice per day, using non-potable water.
K. Streets adjacent to the project site shall be swept daily to
remove silt which may have accumulated from
construction activities so as to prevent excessive amounts
of dust from leaving the site.
L. Wheel washers may be required when significant offsite
• import or export of fill is involved.
M. Large canopy shade trees shall be provided along street
frontages and within parking areas to shade paved areas
and minimize urban heat build-up.
Mitigation Measure 4.b.1: The proposed creek bridge shall be BP,GP PS 4.b.1
supported by city-approved caissons. Caisson locations shall
be tested prior to drilling to insure that no major roots are
damaged. Adjacent trees shall have tree trunk protection
(2"x4"x8' boards wired together and secured around the tree
trunk prior to bridge construction).
Mitigation Measure 4.b.2: As recommended by California BP,GP PS 4abo�
Department of Fish&Game Notification R3-2001-0171:
■ All work in the stream shall be confined to June 15 to
October 15.
• No equipment will be operated in live(wet)stream
channels.
■ Any runoff during construction shall be diverted so as not to
enter the stream. Sediment catchment basins,erosion
control mats,fabric fences,or other appropriate means
shall be used when such diversion are necessary.
■ Wash water containing mud or silt from construction
operations shall not be allowed to enter the stream.
■ Structures and associated materials not designed to
withstand high seasonal flows shall be removed to areas
above the high water mark before such flows occur.
■ No debris,soil,silt, bark,sawdust, rubbish,cement or
concrete or washing thereof,oil or petroleum products or
other organic or earthen material from construction or
associated activity or whatever nature shall be allowed to
enter into or placed where it may be washed by rainfall or
• runoff into the stream. When operation are completed,any
excess materials or debris shall be removed from the work
area. No rubbish shall be deposited within 150 feet of the
high water mark of the stream.
_ ;i4
Conditions of Approval/ Timing Responsibility Mitigation
Mitigation Monitoring Program
/Monitoring Measure •
PS:Planning Services
BL:Business License BS:Building Services
66340 Alcantara Avenue GP.Gra?ngPennit FO:Fire Depwinient
BP:Building PemB PD:Police Departrnent
PD-7 Master Plan of Development Fl:Final inspection CE City Engineer
To,Tenp-ayasbawater
CUP 2000-0024/ZCH 2000-0008 FO.FnalCccu��� Ckcn Atliorney
Mitigation Measure 4.e.1: The building permit site plan shall BP,GP PS 4.e.1
identify all protection and enhancement measures
recommended by the Certified Arborist in the Tree Protection
Plan.Tree protection fencing shall be installed at the locations
called out in the Tree Protection Plan.
Mitigation Measure 4.e.2: The developer shall contract with a BP,GP PS 4.e.2
certified arborist during all phases of project implementation.
The certified arborists shall be responsible for monitoring the
project during all phases of construction through project
completion, as follows:
(a) A written agreement between the arborist and the
developer outlining a arborist monitoring schedule for
each construction phase through final inspection shall be
submitted to and approved by planning staff prior to the
issuance of building/grading permits.
(b) Arborist shall schedule a pre-construction meeting with
engineering/planning staff,grading equipment operators,
project superintendent to review the project conditions and
requirements prior to any grubbing or earth work for any
portion of the project site. All tree protection fencing and
trunk protection shall be installed for inspection during the
meeting. Tree protection fencing shall be installed at the
line of encroachment into the tree's root zone area. As
identified in the tree protection plan,the root zone equals
1-foot radius for every 1 inch of tree trunk diameter.
Several trees on this site will require tree trunk protection.
Tree trunk protection is 2"x 4"x8 foot boards that are
wired together and placed around the tree trunk. Trees
requiring this protection are:#5,6,20,21,22, 32,33, 34,
and 35 as identified on the Tree Protection Plan.
(c) As specified by the arborist report and City staff:
■ Remove all berry vines and trees designated for
removal by hand;
■ Prune all trees to be saved for structural strength and
crown cleaning by a licensed and certified arborist;
• Remove all debris and spoils from the lot cleaning and
tree pruning.
■ Grub only for the proposed driveway(do not grade nor
compact).
■ Install porous pavers over a three-inch bed of 3/inch
granite covered with one-inch pea gravel for screeding.
■ Use pegged curbs to secure the porous pavers.
Pegged curbs are reinforced six to eight curbs poured
at grade with a one-foot by one-foot pothole every four
to six linear feet.
■ All trenching or grading within the protected root zone
area,outside of the tree protection fence shall require
hand trenching or preserve and protect roots that are
larger than 2 inches in diameter.
■ No grading or trenching is allowed within the fenced •
protected area.
■ Any roots that are 4 inches in diameter or larger are
not to be cut until inspected and approved by the on-
Conditions of Approval/ Timing Responsibility Mitigation
•
Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure
PS:Planning Services
BL:Business License BS:Building Services
66340 Alcantara Avenue GP:GradingPermd FD:FireDepxtrnent
BP:Building Penit PD:Police Departrnent
PD-7 Master Plan of Development F:Finallnspeclion CE:City Engineer
TO:Temporary Occupancy WW:Wastewater
CUP 2000-0024/ZCH 2000-0008 FO:Final Occupancy CA.,C4Atmmey
site arborist.
(d) Upon project completion and prior to final occupancy a
final status report shall be prepared by the project arborist
certifying that the tree protection plan was implemented,
the trees designated for protection were protected during
construction,and the construction-related tree protection
measures are no longer required for tree protection.
Mitigation Measure 5.e: Should any cultural resources be GP BS 5.e
unearthed during site development work,the provisions of
CEQA-Section 15064.5,will be followed to reduce impacts to
a non-significant level.
Mitigation Measure 6.b.1: The grading permit application GP PS,BS,CE 6.b.1
plans shall include erosion control measures to prevent soil,
dirt, and debris from entering the storm drain system during
and after construction. A separate plan shall be submitted for
this purpose and shall be subject to review and approval of the
City Engineer at the time of Building Permit application.
Mitigation Measure 6.b.2: All cut and fill slopes shall be GP PS,BS,CE 6.b.2
hydroseeded with an appropriate erosion control method
(erosion control blanket, hydro-mulch,or straw mulch
appropriately anchored)immediately after completion of
earthwork between the months of October 15 through April 15.
All disturbed slopes shall have appropriate erosion control
methods in place. Duration of the project: The contractor will
be responsible for the clean-up of any mud or debris that is
tracked onto public streets by construction vehicles.
Mitigation Measure 6.c.d: A soils report shall be required to be GP BS 6.c.d
submitted with a future building permit by the building
department.The building plans will be required to follow the
recommendations of the soils report to assure safety for
occupants and buildings.
Mitigation Measure 8.e.f.1: A Stormwater Pollution Prevention GP PS,BS,CE 8,0.1
Plan (SWPPP)/Erosion Control Plan shall be submitted and
approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of the
building permit. The plan shall include storm water measures
for the operation and maintenance of the project for the review
and approval of the City Engineer. The Building Permit
application plans shall identify Best Management Practices
(BMPs)appropriate to the uses conducted on site that
effectively prohibit the entry of pollutants into storm water
runoff.
Mitigation Measure 8.e.f.2: The developer is responsible for GP PS,BS,CE 8.e.f.2
ensuring that all contractors are aware of all storm water
quality measures and that such measures are implemented.
Failure to comply with the approved construction Best
Management Practices will result in the issuance of correction
notices,citations,or stop orders.
Mitigation Measure 11.d: All construction activities shall BP,GP PS,BS 11.d
comply with the City of Atascadero Noise Ordinance for hours
of operation.
• Construction activities shall be limited to the following hours of
operation:
Conditions of Approval/ Timing Responsibility Mitigation
Mitigation Monitoring Program
/Monitoring Measure •
PS:Planning Services
BL Business License BS:Building Services
66340 Alcantara Avenue GF.Grading Pant FD:Fre Department
BP:Buldirg Penrit PD:Police Deportment
PD-7 Master Plan of Development FI:Finallnspeclion CE City Engineer
TO:Temporary Occupancy WW:wastewater
CUP 2000-00241ZCH 2000-0008 FO:Final Occuparq cacaynn«ney
• 7 a.m.to 7 p.m. Monday through Friday
• 9 a.m.to 6 p.m. Saturday
• No construction on Sunday
Further, particularly loud noises shall not occur before 8 a.m.
on weekdays and not at all on weekends.
The hours of construction may be modified by the Community
Development Director upon a determination that unusually
loud construction activities are having a significant impact on
the neighbors.
Failure to comply with the above-described hours of operation
may result in withholding of inspections and possible
construction prohibitions,subject to the review and approval of
the Planning Commission.
A sign shall be posted on-site with the hours of operation and
a telephone number of the person to be contacted in the event
of any violations. The details of such a sign shall be approved
by staff during the Grading Plan/Building Permit review
process.
Mitigation Measure 16.c.1: Points of concentrated drainage GP BS,CE 16.c.1 •
into the creek shall incorporate natural rock riprap designed to
blend with the natural landscape and function to dissipate
energy and eliminate creek bank erosion,subject to review
and approval of the City Engineer.
•
• EXHIBIT B:Site Plan
• a_*
it
; 3
-t
It
tit
tib ; ;
= g Q a
t
y
�J4
EXHIBIT C:Statistical Summary of Project
•
Proposed Project Summary
Building Footprint 1744 sf 1872 sf 1238 sf 1560 sf 1560 sf 1229 sf
(not to exceed 35%) 21% 22% 20% 23% 20% 18%
Landscaped Area 5330 sf 6440 sf 4000 sf 3970 sf 4690 sf 4770 sf
(minimum 40%) 63% 76% 66% 59% 59% 71%
Covered Parking 2 spaces 2 spaces 2 spaces 2 spaces 2 spaces 2 spaces
Guest Parking 2 spaces 2 spaces 2 spaces 2 spaces 2 spaces 2 spaces
Floor Plan C existing A B B Reverse D
Lower Living Area 1304 sf 1250 sf 798 sf 1119 sf 1119 sf 789 sf
Upper Living Area 566 sf none 916 sf 914 sf 914 sf 730 sf
Garage 1440 sf 1440 sf 1440 sf 1440 sf 1440 sf 440sf
•
EXHIBIT D: Landscape Plan
•
i
.0
•
•
' A 1
4 'egill I Z
fill], Iii fit
uq
a s [
I 1
11,11 1
Its i " a j .i
Jill
silli
5
Jill
fill
'I
:.57
• EXHIBIT E.Grading and Drainage Plan
ED j
All. Iry
� • a� . S
� �� Kit �� _ �,��\ _ � •� _�`
♦ i
pp e
'� /. 1���. � � ,f• �� � 'v � � Qom\
till a,
? ase
1 ` <' \
p IN
% O
distI l.l_��Pil; rlill,�. it-Ili "
It "a
lit I£ a • • lilt.
_ Is l l
r
l a n� 1;10111ark I, a
_illa � ; 'c R •U . ��� u
s �
EXHIBIT F: Lot 1 -ELEVATIONS AND FLOOR PLANS
•
IWI
.mow....
0 WNPE ELEVATION Icuvwn lFf.t AlVFl
0000
kK.r LOT 1
0 pa
0 ' 0
ILM
` 1 19
• EXHIBIT F: Lot 3-ELEVATIONS AND FLOOR PLANS
.w,., .r,r .....
+ D�dO
11 rAl
v+n+�.
i OT.'3
EXHIBIT F: Lot 4-ELEVATIONS AND FLOOR PLANS
•
0
m ® m
' rl RKilfT ELEVATION.
m
JE-MI-11 I
Mull
r LOT 4
✓d
co
O p �.;•
(Q
LOT,4
J-l l
• EXHIBIT F:Lot 5-ELEVATIONS AND FLOOR PLANS
a
® ❑m m
.�. . 0 x...:w,,..
AM
m - RE
• n .m.a horn s A1lok LOT S '
�•e
..� —
Y
3,
� �i_lt
flfWPFR IX1A P4 A�! (ZL{ 0.Rnm R f33 LOT S
xra �f w
e `.
EXHIBIT F: Lot 6-ELEVATIONS AND FLOOR PLANS •
FM ® m
�F�ATON PoOHT SOE ELEVATION - mwr.e,r w.mnws
,��,e
4
FfaN_0"AT1011 YION LOT 61 - •
L
• EXHIBIT G: EXTERIOR COLOR&MATERIAL SAMPLE BOARDS
RU55ELL PD7 RUSSELL PD7
TECORIDA AVENUE TECORIDA AVENUE
LOT I
ATAS ,CA. ATA5CADERO,CA,
LOT LOT 3
COLOR BOARD COLOR BOARD
IVORY PALACE ba'RIOR STUCCO COLOR
EX7EKOR STUCCO COLOR
CASTY GREY
NA:'URALLY CALM ACCENT COLOR ME
SURRY i3EIGE
ACCENT COLOR.
COUNTRY5TORE TRIM COLOR
CALM MATERTKN4 COLOR
51AKE BLEND TILE COLOR
MINTWCOD 111-1 COLOR
RU55ELL PD7 PU55ELL PD7
TECOKDA AVENUE rtCOKOA AVENUE
ATA5CADERO,CA. ATASCADERO,CA..
LOT 4 LOT 5
COLOR BOARD COLOR BOARD
•
FARM NOU5E BEIGE EXTERIOR STUCCO COLOR
Si O�:YE Vr'HITE EXTEKOR STUCCO COLOR
WOODLAND M`"STERY ACCENT COLOR
50UTHMN SHADOW ACCENT COLOR
mmum
SPRNG AWAKENING TRI:V1.COLOR DU55Y CANYON. TRIM COLOR
'SLATE GREEN TILE COLOR
CANYON BROWN .TILE CO,OR
RU55ELL PD7
TECOKDA AVENUE
AT.A5CADERO.CA.
LOT G
COLOR 13Q P.M
RENCHSILVER E F-KE` OR STUCCO COLOR
1EA,.11 ACCENT COLOR
• BLUE'1AY 7R1?,1 C.OL OR
CATALINA TILE COLOR ✓ `V I*
ATTACHMENT 6: Draft Resolution C
PD-7 Master Plan of Development(CUP 2000-0024)/ZCH2000-0008/TTM2001-0011 •
Approval of Proposed Vesting Tentative Tract Map
DRAFT RESOLUTION C
A RESOLUTION OF THE ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL APPROVING
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2001-0011 THEREBY ALLOWING A SIX-
LOT CLUSTER RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF APN 030-029-065 CONSISTENT
WITH THE PD-7 MASTER PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT (CUP 2000-0024)
(6340 Alcantara Avenue/Russell)
WHEREAS, an application has been received from Lorraine Russell (PO Box 257,
Atascadero, CA 93423) Applicant and Property Owner to consider a project consisting of a
zone change from RMF-10 (Residential Multi-Family)to RMF-10/PD-7 (Residential Multi-
Family with Planned Development Overlay #7) with the adoption of a Master Plan of
Development, and a six lot residential Tentative Tract Map on APN 030-292-065; and,
WHEREAS, the site's vested General Plan Designation is MDR(Medium-Density •
Residential); and,
WHEREAS,the site's vested zoning district is RMF-10 (Residential Multi-Family);
and,
WHEREAS,the Planning Commission has recommended that a site be rezoned to
include a PD-7 overlay district with a Master Plan of Development thereby allowing a six lot
subdivision of the site; and,
WHEREAS,the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and public notice of
environmental documents, as set forth in the State and local guidelines for implementation of
the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)have been adhered to; and,
WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed Public Hearing upon the subject Tentative
Tract Map application was held by the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero at
which hearing evidence, oral and documentary,was admitted on behalf of said application;
and,
WHEREAS,the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, at a duly noticed
Public Hearing held on January 21, 2003, studied and considered Tentative Tract Map 2001-
0011, after first studying and considering the Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration
prepared for the project; and,
•
tr
• NOW, THEREFORE,the City Council takes the following actions:
Section 1. Findings of Approval for Vesting Tentative Tract Map, the Atascadero
City Council finds as follows:
1. The proposed subdivision, as conditioned, is consistent with the General Plan and
applicable zoning requirements.
2. The design and improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the
General Plan and applicable zoning requirements.
3. The proposed subdivision, as conditioned, is consistent with the Planned
Development Overlay District 7 Master Plan of Development(CUP 2000-0024).
4. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed.
5. The site is physically suitable for the density of development proposed.
6. The design and improvement of the proposed subdivision will not cause
substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish and
wildlife or their habitat.
. 7. The design of the subdivision will not conflict with easements acquired by the
public at large for access through, or the use of property within,the proposed
subdivision; or substantially equivalent alternative easements are provided.
8. The proposed subdivision design and type of improvements proposed will not be
detrimental to the health, safety or welfare of the general public.
Section 2. Approval. The Atascadero City Council resolves to approve Vesting
Tentative Tract Map 2001-0011 subject to the following:
1. Exhibit A: Vesting Tentative Tract Map 2001-0011
2. Exhibit B: Conditions of Approval/Mitigation Monitoring Program.
•
r .r
On motion by Council Member , and seconded by Council Member
the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted following roll call vote: •
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ADOPTED:
By:
Jerry L. Clay, Sr., Mayor
Attest:
Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk .
Approved as to form:
Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney
•
�.G7
Exhibit A:Vesting Tentative Tract Map 2001-0011
i �
r ic hu
dK C
p.
tit
:
� 1. ;� •
y
a it :4 o
iii _ 1 �� -
tit
1`4i 4
a • �
FF
tit-
=I L
K
x
Ji :.�
mi
11%
Ilk
c.
Exhibit B:Conditions Of Approval/Mitigation Monitoring Program .
Conditions of Approval/ Timing Responsibility Mitigation
Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure
GP:Grading Permit PS:Planning Services
Swvtm
6340 Alcantara Avenue slP:Say eionPerFD:FieDepa
rnent Mans PD:Porce
Vesting Tentative Tract Map FRInxi. CE C4Eng�an;er�nt
M.
TTM 2001-0011 TO:Ten porgy Occupancy WW:Wastewater
FI:Final inspection CA.City Af[omey
FO:Final Occupancy AMWC:Water Camp.
Planning Services
1. The approval of this Tentative Tract Map shall not FM PS
become final and effective following approval of Zone
Change 2000-0008 and CUP 2000-0024.
2. Approval of this Tentative Tract Map shall be valid for FM PS
two years after its effective date. At the end of the
period, the approval shall expire and become null and
void unless an extension of time is granted pursuant to
a written request received prior to the expiration date.
3. The Community Development Department shall have FM PS
the authority to approve minor changes to the project
that (1) result in a superior site design or appearance,
and/or(2)address a design issue that is not substantive
to the Tentative Tract Map and that the Final Map is in •
substantial conformance with the Tentative Map.
4. The Tract Map shall be subject to additional fees for FM PS
park or recreation purposes (QUIMBY Act) as required
by City Ordinance.
5. The applicant shall record CC&R's for the subdivision FM PS
subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer,
City Attorney and Planning Services. The CC&R's shall
identify the maintenance responsibilities of all private
driveways, sewer facilities, drainage facilities, common
parking areas, site lighting, landscape areas, fencing,
and other common facilities. The CC&R's shall also
state that all exterior colors, exterior materials, yard
fencing and site landscaping shall be consistent with the
overall master plan of development.
6. The granting of this entitlement shall apply to the On going PS
property located at 6340 Alcantara Avenue (APN 030-
292-065)regardless of owner.
7. The Final Map shall be drawn in substantial FM PS
conformance with the approved tentative map, and in
compliance with all conditions set forth herein, shall be
submitted for review and approval in accordance with
the Subdivision Map Act and the City's Subdivision
Ordinance.
8. The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold FM PS •
harmless the City of Atascadero or its agents, officers,
and employees against any claim or action brought to
challenge an approval by the city, or any of its entities,
Conditions of Approval/ Timing Responsibility Mitigation
•
Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure
GP:Grading Penrit PS:Planning Services
BP:Budding Pen it BS:Building Services
6340 Alcantara Avenue SIP:Subdrvisan FD:FireDepartrrrent
Improvement Plans PD:PorteDepatrient
Vesting Tentative Tract Map FM:Final Map CE City Engineer
TTM 2001-0011 TD:Tempwary0ccupancy WK,Wastmater
Fl:Final irgmcbm CA:City Attorney
FO:Final Occupancy AMWC:WaterCongr.
concerning the subdivision.
9. One unit shall be reserved as deed restricted affordable FM PS
unit in the moderate category.
10. Apply the following tree mitigation: (Mitigation Fee GP PS,CE
Table)
Evergreen Native Trees(inches) Deciduous Native Trees(inches) Totals
dbh notes dbh notes
1 0-inches 1 244-inches 64 white oak trees
2 2 0-inches ranging in size from
3 3 0-inches 2-18 inches
4 4 0-inches
5 5 0-inches
6 0-inches
7 0-inches
6 8 0-inches
Total 0-inches Total 244-inches 244-inches
Tree Fund Payment: $ - Tree Fund Payment: $ 3,116.67 $ 3,116.67
City Engineer
Site Specific Conditions
Building Services
11. A soils investigation prepared by a licensed FM CE
Geotechnical Engineer is to be provided for the
project. The report is to be provided at the time of
building permit submittal along with the building plans
for review by the Building Division.
Recommendations contained in the report are to be
incorporated into the project plans.
Fire Marshal
12. Dimension the width of driveway. A minimum 20' FM CE
wide access with a minimum head clearance of 13'-6"
is to be provided to each building location. Access
drives with slopes less than 12%are to have an all-
weather surface. Access drives with slopes equal to
or greater than 12%are to be paved.
Conditions of Approval/ riming Responsibility Mitigation
Mitigation Monitoring Program
/Monitoring Measure
GP:Grading Pemrt PS:Planning Services
BP:Bung Pertrit BS:BuWug Services
6340 Alcantara Avenue SIP:SubMion FD:FreNpartn,ent
lmpmverrient Plans PD:Police Deparbrent
Vesting Tentative Tract Map FM:Final Map CE City Engineer
TTM 2001-0011 TO Ternporary Occupancy M Wastmater
Fl:Final inspection CA City Albrney
FO:Final Occupancy AMC:Water Camp.
13. Show location of existing and any proposed fire FM CE
hydrants. As presented,the project requires one fire
hydrant located within 250 feet of any point along the
front property boundary.
14. Provide a letter from the Atascadero Mutual Water FM CE
Company stating the minimum expected water
available to the site. Amount available must meet
minimum requirement specified in the California Fire
Code.
15. Note that approved address signage is to be FM CE
provided.
16. Note on plans that fire lanes shall be delineated to FM CE
restrict parking as required by the Fire Authority.
17. Access drive where it bridges the creekway is to be FM CE
designed and maintained to the satisfaction of the
Public Works department to support a minimum
40,000 lb. Imposed load at 25 miles per hour for fire
apparatus.
City Engineer
Standard Conditions •
18. Public frontage improvements, on site grading and BP CE
drainage plans and the driveway plans shall be
produced by a registered civil engineer. The plans
shall be in the form required in the City of Atascadero
Engineering Standards. The plans will be reviewed
and approved by the City Engineer.
19. All public improvements shall be constructed in BP CE
conformance with the City of Atascadero Engineering
Department Standard Specifications and Drawings or
as directed by the City Engineer.
20. The applicant shall enter into a Plan Check & BP CE
Inspection agreement with the City.
21. The applicant shall be responsible for the protection, BP CE
relocation and/or alteration of existing utilities.
22. The applicant shall install all new utilities (water, gas, Ongoing CE
electric, cable TV and telephone)underground.
23. The applicant shall monument all property corners for FM CE
construction control and shall promptly replace them
if disturbed.
24. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant FM CE
shall submit a grading and drainage plan with a
separate sheet(s) devoted to sedimentation and
erosion control, prepared by a registered civil
engineer for review and approval by the City
Engineer.
25. Prior to the final inspection,all outstanding plan check FM CE
and inspection fees shall be paid.
26. Prior to the final inspection, the applicant shall submit FM CE •
a written statement from a registered civil engineer
that all work has been completed and is in full
Conditions of Approval/ Timing Responsibility Mitigation
• Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure
GP:Grating Penrit PS:Planning Services
BP:Buldng Pemit BS:Bulling Services
6340 Alcantara Avenue SIR Subdivision FD:FireD%artrnent
Improvement Plans PD:Police Departnent
Vesting Tentative Tract Map FM:Final Map CeCilyEngineer
TTM 2001-0011 TO:TenpMOccupatcy WWI.Wastvrarer
Fi:Finelinspecton CA CityAthney
FO:Final Occupancy AMC:Water Conp.
compliance with the approved plans and the Uniform
Building Code(UBC).
27. Prior to recording the Tract Map, the applicant shall FM CE
submit a map drawn in substantial conformance with
the approved tentative map and in compliance with all
conditions set forth herein. The map shall be
submitted for review and approval by the City in
accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the
City's Subdivision Ordinance.
28. In the event that the applicant is allowed to bond for FM CE
any public improvements required as a condition of
this map, the applicant shall enter into a Subdivision
Improvement Agreement with the City Council. An
engineer's estimate of probable cost shall be
submitted for review and approval by the City
Engineer to determine the amount of the bond. The
Subdivision Improvement Agreement shall record
concurrently with the Final Map.
29. A preliminary subdivision guarantee shall be FM CE
submitted for review in conjunction with the
processing of the Tract Map.
• 30. The final map shall be signed by the City Engineer FM CE
prior to the map being placed on the agenda for City
Council acceptance.
31. Prior to recording the Tract Map, the applicant shall FM CE
pay all outstanding plan check/inspection fees.
32. Prior to recording the Tract Map, the applicant shall
set monuments at all new property corners. A
registered civil engineer or licensed land surveyor
shall indicate by certificate on the parcel map, that
corners have been set or shall be set by a date
specific and that they will be sufficient to enable the
survey to be retraced.
33. All existing and proposed utility, pipeline, open space, FM AMWC
or other easements are to be shown on the Tract
Map. If there are building or other restrictions related
to the easements, they shall be noted on the
final/parcel map. The applicant shall show all access
restrictions on the final/parcel map.
34. Prior to recording the parcel map, the applicant shall FM AMWC
have the map reviewed by all applicable public and
private utility companies (cable, telephone, gas,
electric, Atascadero Mutual Water Company). The
applicant shall obtain a letter from each utility
company indicating their review of the map. The
letter shall identify any new easements that may be
required by the utility company. A copy of the letter
shall be submitted to the City. New easements shall
be shown on the parcel map.
35. Prior to the issuance of building permits the applicant BP AMWC
• shall submit plans and supporting calculations/reports
including street improvements,underground utilities,
composite utilities,and grading/drainage plans
prepared by a registered civil engineer for review and
72 e. �
Conditions of Approval/ 'riming Responsibility Mitigation
Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure •
GP:Grading Permit PS:Planning Services
BP:Building Penrit BS:Building Sery es
6340 Alcantara Avenue SIP:Subdivision Fire
Irrprove TV4 Plans PD:Poke Department
Vesting Tentative Tract Map FM:Final Map CECilyEnghw
TTM 2001-0011 TO.TemporayOceupancy WW:Wastawasr
FI:Final inspection CA City A&rrW
FO:Final Occupancy AMWC Walar Camp.
approval by the City Engineer.
City Engineer
Site Specific Conditions
36. This project is required to pave Tecorida Ave, with FP AMWC
Curb and Gutter on the east side, from the end of the
existing paving on the south side of the project to the
end of the existing paving (at the barricade) for
orderly development and traffic circulation.The length
of this paving is approximately 128 feet.
37. Frontage improvements required are curb and gutter BP AMWC
on the east side of Tecorida Ave and concrete drive
approach or concrete cross gutter at the driveway to
allow the drainage to be conveyed down Tecorida. _
38. Provisions for on-site circulation reciprocal access FM CE
between the adjacent westerly property shall be
required at the location identified on the site plan.
39. This project is required to pave Tecorida Ave, with FM CE
Curb, Gutter, and Sidewalk on the east side, from the
end of the existing paving on the south side of the •
project to the end of the existing paving (at the
barricade) for orderly development and traffic
circulation. The length of this paving is approximately
128 feet. The sidewalk will require additional setback
onto the project site to avoid impacts to the existing
trees and shall require granting of access easement to
be approved with the final map by the City Engineer.
Wastewater Department
40. Public SS shall be extended to the far property line. BP CE/WW
41. Each building shall be separately and independently BP CE/WW
connected with the public sewer.
42. Drainage piping serving fixtures which have flood level BP CE/WW
rims located below the elevation of the next upstream
manhole (or cleanout) cover shall be protected by a
backflow valve.
43. Sewer connection permits shall be issued separately BP CE/WW
(from building permit) after public sewer extension has
been completed and has received a satisfactory final
Public Works inspection.
44. Final project inspection shall be contingent upon BP CE/WW
completion of the public sewer extension and Public
Works final inspection. .
� tJ
Conditions of Approval/ Timing Responsibility Mitigation
•
Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure
GF Grading Permit PS:Planning Services
BP:Building Perrtd BS:Bulding Services
6340 Alcantara Avenue SIF.Subdivision FD:FueDeparhnsnt
VestingIrnprovernent Tentative Tract Ma FU
ans PD:PorceDepartrnent
P FM:Final Map CE City Engineer
TTM 2001-0011 TO,Temporary Occupancy WW:Wastewater
FI:Final inspection CA.City Attorney
FO:Fuwl Occupancy AMWC:Water Coni,
Atascadero Mutual Water Company
45. Prior to recordation of the final map, the applicant GP,BP CE
shall submit plans for review and approval by AMWC
for all existing and proposed water distribution
facilities that provide water service to the proposed
lots. All new water distribution facilities shall be
constructed in conformance with Atascadero Mutual
Water Company Standards.
46. Prior to the issuance of building permits,the applicant GP,BP CE
shall obtain a "Will Serve" letter from the Atascadero
Mutual Water Company for the newly created lots.
47. Prior to the start of construction, the applicant shall GP,BP CE
pay all installation and connection fees required by
the Atascadero Mutual Water Company, or enter in to
a"deferred connection"agreement.
48. Private easements may be needed for the private GP, BP CE
water service lines that serve parcels which do not
front on Tecorida Road.
49. Water meters located on Tecorida Ave for Lots 1 and GP, BP CE
6 are in acceptable location. Meters for newly created
Lots 3, 4 & 5 need to be located on frontage of road
• at Tecorida Ave and private utility easements
provided for private service lines to parcels.
Mitigation Measures
BP PS 1.c.1
Mitigation Measure 1.c.1: All lighting shall be designed to
eliminate any off site glare. All exterior site lights shall utilize
full cut-off,"hooded"lighting fixtures to prevent offsite light
spillage and glare. Any luminaire pole height shall not exceed
30-feet in height, limit intensity to 2.0 foot candles at ingress
/egress,and otherwise 0.6 foot candle minimum to 1.0
maximum in parking areas. Fixtures shall be shield cut-off
type.
Mitigation Measure 1.c.2: The project landscape shall include BP PS 1.c.2
requiring one 24-inch box sized tree within the front yard of
each new residence.
Mitigation Measure 3.b: The project shall be conditioned to BP BS 3.b
comply with all applicable District regulations pertaining to the
control of fugitive dust(PM-10)as contained in section 6.4 of
the Air Quality Handbook. All site grading and demolition
plans notes shall list the following regulations:
C. All material excavated or graded shall be sufficiently
watered to prevent excessive amounts of dust. Watering
shall occur at least twice daily with complete coverage,
preferably in the late morning and after work is finished for
the day.
D. All clearing,grading,earth moving,or excavation activities
shall cease during periods of high winds(i.e.greater than
20 mph averaged over one hour)so as to prevent
• excessive amounts of dust.
M. All material transported off-site shall be either sufficiently
watered or securely covered to prevent excessive
e �
Conditions of Approval/ Timing Responsibility Mitigation
Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure •
GP:Gradng Permit PS:Planning Services
BP Building Pemrt BS:Building Services
6340 Alcantara Avenue SIP:Subdivision FD:FitDeparhrnent
Irrpmw ent Plans PD:Police Depa i hent
Vesting Tentative Tract Map FM:Final Map CE:City Engineer
TTM 2001-0011 TO:Te r-mOaigancy Ww:WwWwater
FI:Final inspection CA City Attomey
FO Final Occupancy AMM:WaWG mp.
amounts of dust.
N. The area disturbed by clearing, grading,earth moving,or
excavation operations shall be minimized so as to prevent
excessive amounts of dust.
O. Permanent dust control measured identified in the
approved project revegetation and landscape plans shall
be implemented as soon as possible following completion
of any soil disturbing activities.
P. Exposed ground areas that are planned to be reworked at
dates greater than one month after initial grading shall be
sown with fast-germinating native grass seed and watered
until vegetation becomes established.
Q. All disturbed areas not subject to revegetation shall be
stabilized using approved chemical soil binders,jute
netting, or other methods in advance by the APCD.
R. All roadways, driveways,sidewalks,etc.to be paved shall
be completed as soon as possible. In addition,structural
foundations shall be completed as soon as possible
following building pad construction.
S. On-site vehicle speed shall be limited to 15 mph for any
unpaved surface.
T. All unpaved areas with vehicle traffic shall be watered at
least twice per day, using non-potable water. •
U. Streets adjacent to the project site shall be swept daily to
remove silt which may have accumulated from
construction activities so as to prevent excessive amounts
of dust from leaving the site.
V. Wheel washers may be required when significant offsite
import or export of fill is involved.
M. Large canopy shade trees shall be provided along street
frontages and within parking areas to shade paved areas
and minimize urban heat build-up.
Mitigation Measure 4.b.1: The proposed creek bridge shall be BR GP PS 4.b.1
supported by city-approved caissons. Caisson locations shall
be tested prior to drilling to insure that no major roots are
damaged. Adjacent trees shall have tree trunk protection
(2"x4"x8' boards wired together and secured around the tree
trunk prior to bridge construction).
Mitigation Measure 4.b.2: As recommended by California BP,GP PS 4.b.2
Department of Fish&Game Notification R3-2001-0171:
■ All work in the stream shall be confined to June 15 to
October 15.
■ No equipment will be operated in live(wet)stream
channels.
■ Any runoff during construction shall be diverted so as not to
enter the stream. Sediment catchment basins,erosion
control mats,fabric fences,or other appropriate means
shall be used when such diversion are necessary.
■ Wash water containing mud or silt from construction
operations shall not be allowed to enter the stream.
■ Structures and associated materials not designed to
withstand high seasonal flows shall be removed to areas •
above the high water mark before such flows occur.
■ No debris,soil,silt, bark,sawdust, rubbish,cement or
concrete or washing thereof,oil or petroleum products or
� 1 �
S
r
Conditions of Approval/ Timing Responsibility Mitigation
• Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure
GP:Grading Permit PS:Planning Services
BP:BOding Pearn BS:Building Services
6340 Alcantara Avenue SIP:Subdivision FD:Fire DWatrent
Vesting Tentative Tract Ma Improvement Plans PD:PaiceDepartnent
g p FM Final Map CE City Engineer
TTM 2001-0011 TO:TemporayOccupancy WW:Wastewater
FI:Fnaiinspection CA CityAtmmey
FO:Final Occupancy AMWC:Waler Cmp.
other organic or earthen material from construction or
associated activity or whatever nature shall be allowed to
enter into or placed where it may be washed by rainfall or
runoff into the stream. When operation are completed,any
excess materials or debris shall be removed from the work
area. No rubbish shall be deposited within 150 feet of the
high water mark of the stream.
Mitigation Measure 4.e.1: The building permit site plan shall BP,GP PS 4.e.1
identify all protection and enhancement measures
recommended by the Certified Arborist in the Tree Protection
Plan.Tree protection fencing shall be installed at the locations
called out in the Tree Protection Plan.
Mitigation Measure 4.e.2: The developer shall contract with a BP,GP PS 4.e.2
certified arborist during all phases of project implementation.
The certified arborists shall be responsible for monitoring the
project during all phases of construction through project
completion,as follows:
(a) A written agreement between the arborist and the
developer outlining a arborist monitoring schedule for
each construction phase through final inspection shall be
submitted to and approved by planning staff prior to the
. issuance of building/grading permits.
(b) Arborist shall schedule a pre-construction meeting with
engineering/planning staff,grading equipment operators,
project superintendent to review the project conditions and
requirements prior to any grubbing or earth work for any
portion of the project site. All tree protection fencing and
trunk protection shall be installed for inspection during the
meeting. Tree protection fencing shall be installed at the
line of encroachment into the tree's root zone area. As
identified in the tree protection plan,the root zone equals
1-foot radius for every 1 inch of tree trunk diameter.
Several trees on this site will require tree trunk protection.
Tree trunk protection is 2"x 4"x8 foot boards that are
wired together and placed around the tree trunk. Trees
requiring this protection are:#5,6,20,21,22,32, 33, 34,
and 35 as identified on the Tree Protection Plan.
(c) As specified by the arborist report and City staff:
■ Remove all berry vines and trees designated for
removal by hand;
■ Prune all trees to be saved for structural strength and
crown cleaning by a licensed and certified arborist;
• Remove all debris and spoils from the lot cleaning and
tree pruning.
■ Grub only for the proposed driveway(do not grade nor
compact).
■ Install porous pavers over a three-inch bed of%inch
granite covered with one-inch pea gravel for screeding.
• Use pegged curbs to secure the porous pavers.
Pegged curbs are reinforced six to eight curbs poured
at grade with a one-foot by one-foot pothole every four I
to six linear feet.
Conditions of Approval/ 'riming Responsibility Mitigation
Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure •
GP:Grading Pent PS:Planning S&-*w
BP:Building Pertrit BS:Building Services
6340 Alcantara Avenue SIP:Subdivision FD:Fie*atmnt
ant
Vesting Tentative Tract Map FiI„t.F�M a� CE�ei Veu
TTM 2001-0011 Ta Temporary ocCuparsy WW:Wastwater
FI:Final inspection CA.City Attorney
FO Final Occupancy AMWC:WaWCamp.
■ All trenching or grading within the protected root zone
area, outside of the tree protection fence shall require
hand trenching or preserve and protect roots that are
larger than 2 inches in diameter.
• No grading or trenching is allowed within the fenced
protected area.
■ Any roots that are 4 inches in diameter or larger are
not to be cut until inspected and approved by the on-
site arborist.
(d) Upon project completion and prior to final occupancy a
final status report shall be prepared by the project arborist
certifying that the tree protection plan was implemented,
the trees designated for protection were protected during
construction, and the construction-related tree protection
measures are no longer required for tree protection.
Mitigation Measure 5.e: Should any cultural resources be GP BS 5.e
unearthed during site development work,the provisions of
CEQA-Section 15064.5,will be followed to reduce impacts to
a non-significant level.
Mitigation Measure 6.b.1: The grading permit application GP PS,BS,CE 6.b.1
plans shall include erosion control measures to prevent soil,
dirt,and debris from entering the storm drain system during •
and after construction. A separate plan shall be submitted for
this purpose and shall be subject to review and approval of the
City Engineer at the time of Building Permit application.
Mitigation Measure 6.b.2: All cut and fill slopes shall be GP PS,BS,CE 6.b.2
hydroseeded with an appropriate erosion control method
(erosion control blanket, hydro-mulch,or straw mulch
appropriately anchored)immediately after completion of
earthwork between the months of October 15 through April 15.
All disturbed slopes shall have appropriate erosion control
methods in place. Duration of the project: The contractor will
be responsible for the clean-up of any mud or debris that is
tracked onto public streets by construction vehicles.
Mitigation Measure 6.c.d: A soils report shall be required to be GP BS 6.c.d
submitted with a future building permit by the building
department.The building plans will be required to follow the
recommendations of the soils report to assure safety for
occupants and buildings.
Mitigation Measure 8.e.f.1: A Stormwater Pollution Prevention GP PS,BS,CE 8.0.1
Plan(SWPPP)/Erosion Control Plan shall be submitted and
approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of the
building permit. The plan shall include storm water measures
for the operation and maintenance of the project for the review
and approval of the City Engineer. The Building Permit
application plans shall identify Best Management Practices
(BMPs)appropriate to the uses conducted on site that
effectively prohibit the entry of pollutants into storm water
runoff.
Mitigation Measure 8.e.f.2: The developer is responsible for GP PS,BS,CE 8.e.f.2
ensuring that all contractors are aware of all storm water •
quality measures and that such measures are implemented.
Failure to comply with the approved construction Best
Management Practices will result in the issuance of correction
Conditions of Approval/ Timing Responsibility Mitigation
Mitigation Monitoring Program
/Monitoring Measure
GP Grading Permit PS:Planning Services
BP:Building Pernik BS:Building Services
6340 Alcantara Avenue SIP.Subdivision FD:FiireDepartrnent
Vesting Tentative Tract Map IFM:Fin Map s CE aty Engineer
PD:Police nt
TTM 2001-0011 TO TempoM Occupancy WW:Wastewater
FI:Final inspection CA City Attorney
FO:Final Occupancy AMC:Water Comp.
notices,citations, or stop orders.
Mitigation Measure 11.d: All construction activities shall BP,GP PS,BS 11A
comply with the City of Atascadero Noise Ordinance for hours
of operation.
Construction activities shall be limited to the following hours of
operation:
• 7 a.m.to 7 p.m. Monday through Friday
• 9 a.m.to 6 p.m. Saturday
• No construction on Sunday
Further,particularly loud noises shall not occur before 8 a.m.
on weekdays and not at all on weekends.
The hours of construction may be modified by the Community
Development Director upon a determination that unusually
loud construction activities are having a significant impact on
the neighbors.
Failure to comply with the above-described hours of operation
may result in withholding of inspections and possible
construction prohibitions,subject to the review and approval of
the Planning Commission.
A sign shall be posted on-site with the hours of operation and
a telephone number of the person to be contacted in the event
of any violations. The details of such a sign shall be approved
by staff during the Grading Plan/Building Permit review
process.
Mitigation Measure 16.c.1: Points of concentrated drainage GP BS,CE 16.c.1
into the creek shall incorporate natural rock liprap designed to
blend with the natural landscape and function to dissipate
energy and eliminate creek bank erosion,subject to review
and approval of the City Engineer.
•
m
ITEM NUMBER- B-2
DATE: 03/11/2003
.
lie IN
n
1918 � � 19 9
Atascadero City Council
Staff Report - City Manager's Office
Cost Allocation Plan and Fee Study
RECOMMENDATION:
Council accept public comment and provide direction to staff to return the item for the next
Council agenda with an implementing ordinance for consideration of adoption.
DISCUSSION:
In conjunction with the Development Impact Fee Study, the City of Atascadero retained the
services of Revenue and Cost Specialists (RCS), LLC,to perform a Cost Allocation Plan and Fee
Study for the City and its services (Attachment#1). The goal is to develop a computerized cost
and control system for the City, based upon City Council cost recovery policies. The report
informs the City Council and staff about the current status of the cost recovery levels for all City
services. The report also provides information and guidance to future levels of services and the
fairness and appropriateness of its fees.
The City is presently using $2,255,052 in taxes to support services that are discretionary for
Atascadero residents and the service recipients that could (or should) be supported by fees. So
that the services level subsidies can be considered and determined by policy, the report enables
the City Council to review each service and make findings that there are reasons to continue or
adjust the taxpayer,subsidy. General taxes that fund non-fee-based services such as pubic safety
are very limited.Therefore, it is important to carefully consider taxpayer subsidies for "personal
choice" services. As we have seen in the City's Strategic Financial Plan and the recently
completed Facilities Master Plan, the City does not have sufficient funds identified to fund future
capital replacement and infrastructure to maintain City service levels in its present state. To the
extent that taxes are not used to support personal choice services, they can be utilized to fund
capital replacement and other non-fee-supported essential City services.
The Cost Allocation Study identifies and determines the actual cost of the City's internal support
services, such as finance, personnel, building maintenance, technology, City Attorney, etc.,
• which exist to support the external public services. The report identifies the entire range of
ITEM NUMBER: B-2
DATE: 03/11/2003
City-provided public services as well. It categorizes the public services as "community supported
public services" and "personal choice public services" that could be supported by fees. The full
cost of the personal choice services is calculated so that everyone is aware of these costs.
Informed policy decisions can then be made about subsidizing the services with tax resources.
The Cost Allocation Plan becomes a policymaking and accounting tool for the City, to improve
the reasonableness of our fee structure and efficiency of public service delivery.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Potential increased revenue to fund capital replacement and essential City services. Actual
revenue increases are dependent on fees adopted.
ALTERNATIVES:
Amend,modify or reject the Cost Allocation Plan System.
ATTACHMENT:
Attachment#1- Cost of Services Study •
•