HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 02/25/2003 n 107-9
CITY OF A TASCADERO
Isis '
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
TUESDAY, February 25, 2003
7:00 P.M.
City of Atascadero
6500 Palma Avenue, 4t" Floor
Atascadero, California
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: 6:30 P.M.
•
COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION:
(Immediately following Redevelopment Agency Meeting and Closed
Session)
1. PUBLIC COMMENT - CLOSED SESSION
2. Call to Order
a) Conference with legal counsel - Existing litigation (Govt. Code
Sec. 54956.9 (a))
1. Environmental Center of SLO v. City of Atascadero
3. Adjourn
4. CLOSED SESSION REPORT
REGULAR SESSION: 7:00 P.M.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Clay
ROLL CALL: Mayor Clay
Mayor Pro Tem Luna
Council Member Scalise
Council Member O'Malley
Council Member Pacas
INTRODUCTIONS:
APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Roll Call
PRESENTATIONS:
1. Recognition of outgoing California Transportation Advisory Committee (CTAC)
representative, Dennis Schmidt
2. Introduction of Lt. John Hough, Atascadero Police Dept. by Chief Dennis
Hegwood
COMMUNITY FORUM: (This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wanting to address the .
Council on any matter not on this agenda and over which the Council has jurisdiction. Speakers are
limited to five minutes. Please state your name and address for the record before making your
presentation. The Council may take action to direct the staff to place a matter of business on a future
agenda. A maximum of 30 minutes will be allowed for Community Forum, unless changed by the
Council.)
COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS: (On their own initiative, Council Members
may make a brief announcement or a brief report on their own activities. Council Members may ask a
question for clarification, make a referral to staff or take action to have staff place a matter of business on
a future agenda. The Council may take action on items listed on the Agenda.)
1. Official Invocation at City Council Meetings — Discussion and
Direction
■ Item comes before City Council at its own direction for discussion, without specific
recommendation either for or against the policy.
2. Commission Appointments
■ Staff recommendation: Council:
a. Introduce for first reading by title only the draft Ordinance, amending Section 2-
9.02 and Section 2-13.03 of the Atascadero Municipal Code relating to the
appointment of Planning Commission Members and Parks and Recreation
Commission Members; and,
b. Direct selected Council Members to appoint Commissioners and the City Council
approve the appointments.
2
A. CONSENT CALENDAR: (All items on the consent calendar are considered to be routine
and non-controversial by City staff and will be approved by one motion if no member of the
Council or public wishes to comment or ask questions. If comment or discussion is desired by
anyone, the item will be removed from the consent calendar and will be considered in the listed
sequence with an opportunity for any member of the public to address the Council concerning the
item before action is taken.)
1. City Council Minutes - February 11, 2003
■ City Clerk recommendation: City Council approve the City Council minutes of
February 11, 2003. [City Clerk]
2. January Disbursements -January 2003 Accounts Payable & Payroll
■ Fiscal impact: $1,470,463.34.
■ Staff recommendation: City Council approve certified City accounts payable, payroll
and payroll vendor checks for January 2003. [Administrative Services]
3. Request for Designation of the Integrated Waste Management
Authority as Atascadero's Local Enforcement Agency
■ Fiscal impact: None.
■ Staff recommendation: Council adopt draft Resolution, withdrawing the designation
of the San Luis Obispo County Health Department, Division of Environmental Health,
as Atascadero's Local Enforcement Agency, and approving the designation of the
San Luis Obispo County Integrated Waste Management Authority as Atascadero's
• Local Enforcement Agency. [City Manager]
4. Zone Change 2002-0031- 9105 & 9127 San Diego Road (Mehring /
Twin Cities Surveys)
■ Fiscal impact: The project would likely have a slight negative impact on City
revenues. As a general rule, single-family dwellings require services that exceed
the revenue generated by the dwelling.
■ Staff recommendations: City Council introduce for second. reading by title only,
and adopt the draft Ordinance, enacting Zone Change 2002-0031; and amend
the City's Zoning Map to add a PD-16 overlay district to the project area.
[Community Development]
B. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. Development Impact Fee Adjustments
■ Fiscal impact: Actual revenues are not estimated; they will offset expenses
associated with providing services to new development.
■ Staff recommendation: Council accept public comment and provide direction to staff
to return the item for the next Council agenda with an implementing ordinance for
consideration of adoption. [City Manager]
3
2. Residential Second Unit Code Text Amendment -Zone Change 2003-
0039 S
■ Fiscal impact: None.
■ Planning Commission recommendation: City Council introduce for first reading, by
title only, draft Ordinance A amending the Zoning Ordinance to allow second units in
the RSF-Y Zoning district subject to performance standards, [Community
Development]
C. MANAGEMENT REPORTS:
1. Legislative Priorities 2003
■ Fiscal impact: None.
• Staff recommendation: Council:
1. Adopt draft Resolution A establishing the City's legislative priorities for 2003; and,
2. Adopt draft Resolution B providing for a voluntary payroll deduction for Action for
Better Cities. [City Manager]
2. CDBG Annual Allocation
■ Fiscal impact: Available funds are estimated at$227,674 for the 2003 cycle.
■ Staff recommendation: City Council forward to the County Board of Supervisors
allocation recommendations- for the :2003 Community Development Block Grant
(CDBG)funds. [Public Works]
D. COMMITTEE & LIAISON. REPORTS: (The following represent standing committees.
Informative status reports will be given, as felt necessary.):
Mayor Clay
1. Water Committees
2. County Mayor's Round Table
Mayor Pro Tem Luna
1. Finance Committee
2. Integrated Waste Management Authority(IWMA)
Council Member Scalise
1. Atascadero State Hospital Advisory Board
2. Local Agency Formation Commissions(LAFCO)
3. S.L.O. Council of Governments (SLOCOG)/S.L.O. Regional Transit Authority(SLORTA)
Council Member O'Malley
1. Finance Committee
2. City/Schools Committee
3. Air Pollution Control District(APCD)
4. Economic Vitality Corporation, Board of Directors (EVC)
Council Member Pacas
1. City/Schools Committee
2. Atascadero Youth Task Force
4
E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION:
1. City Council
2. City Clerk
3. City Treasurer
4. City Attorney
5. City Manager
F. ADJOURNMENT:
Please note: Should anyone challenge any proposed development entitlement listed on this Agenda in court, that
person may be limited to raising those issues addressed at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written
correspondence delivered to the City Council at or prior to this public hearing. Correspondence submitted at this
public hearing will be distributed to the Council and available for review in the City Clerk's office.
I, Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk of the City of Atascadero, declare under the penalty of
perjury that the foregoing agenda for the February 25, 2003 Regular Session of the Atascadero
City Council was posted on February 19, 2003 at Atascadero City Hall, 6500 Palma Ave.,
Atascadero, CA 93422 and was available for public review in the Customer Service Center at
that location.
Signed this 19"' day of February 2003 at Atascadero, California.
Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Cler
City of Atascadero
5
City of Atascadero
WELCOME TO THE ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
The City Council meets in regular session on the second and fourth Tuesday of each month at 7:00 p.m., in the
Council Chamber of City Hall Matters are considered by the Council in the order of the printed Agenda.
Copies of the staff reports or other documentation relating to each item of business referred to on the Agenda
are on file in the office of the City Clerk (Room 311) and are available for public inspection during City Hall
business hours at the Central Receptionist counter and on our website, www.atascadero.ora. An agenda packet
is also available for public review at the Atascadero Library, 6850 Morro Road. Contracts, Resolutions and
Ordinances will be allocated a number once they are approved by the City Council. The minutes of this
meeting will reflect these numbers. All documents submitted by the public during Council meetings that are
` either read into the record or referred to in their statement will be noted in the minutes and available for review
in the City Clerk's office.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special_assistance to participate in a
City meeting or other services offered by this City, please contact the City Manager's Office, (805) 461-
5010, or the City Clerk's Office, (805) 461-5074. Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time
when services are needed will assist the City staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to
provide accessibility to the meeting or service.
TO SPEAK ON AGENDA ITEMS
Members of the audience may speak on any item on the agenda. The Mayor will identify the subject, staff will
give their report, and the Council will ask questions of staff. The Mayor will announce when the public
comment period is open and will request anyone interested to address the Council regarding the matter being
considered to.step up to the podium. If you wish to speak for, against or comment in any way:
• You must approach the podium and be recognized by the Mayor
• Give your name and address(not required)
• Make your statement
• All comments should be made to the Mayor and Council
• All comments limited to 5 minutes(unless changed by the Council)
• No one may speak for a second time until everyone wishing to speak has had an opportunity to do
so,and no one may speak more than twice on any item.
The Mayor will announce when the public comment period is closed, and thereafter, no further public
comments will be heard by the Council.
TO SPEAK ON SUBJECTS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA
Under Agenda item, "COMMUNITY FORUM",,the Mayor will call for anyone from the audience having
business with the Council to:
• Please approach the podium and be recognized
• Give your name and address(not required)
• State the nature of your business
This is the time items not on the Agenda may be brought to the Council's attention. A maximum of 30 minutes
will be allowed for Community Forum(unless changed by the Council).
TO HAVE ITEMS PLACED ON AGENDA
All business matters to appear on the Agenda must be in the Office of the City Manager 14 days preceding the •
Council meeting. Should you have a matter you wish to bring before the Council,please mail or bring a written
communication to the City Manager's office in City Hall prior to the deadline.
DATE: 02/25/2003
K
Iola I 1978
Atascadero City Council
City Attorney Report - Roy A. Hanley
Official Invocation at City Council Meetings
Discussion and Direction
RECOMMENDATION:
This item comes before the City Council at its own direction. The item is not staff driven, and
comes without a specific recommendation for or against the policy. As staff understands the
issue, the specific question is whether or not to have official invocations at City Council
meetings and, if so, what procedures the City Council would like to have established.
DISCUSSION:
• Attached to this Agenda Report is a copy of a non-confidential memorandum that was previously
circulated to the City Council and the City Manager. Briefly, it confirms that the most recent
appellate court activity in this area outlawed a program whereby a minister's association handled
rotation for official invocations at_City Council meetings. The City failed to ensure that the
prayers refrained from making references to Jesus Christ or contained any other secular
references that would or could constitute the establishment of one religion or group of beliefs
over another. The method of selection previously suggested at public comment would be exactly
like that ruled unconstitutional recently. Perhaps partially as a result of this recent court ruling,
the City of Morro Bay has recently ended a practice of formal invocations and replaced it with a
moment of silence. If the City Council does decide to formalize an invocation process, great care
will have to be taken to make sure that no illegal references are made in such invocations.
ALTERNATIVES:
There is no law that prevents prayer from being given at public comment. If a minister would
like to participate in the regular public comment portion of the agenda and pray, that would not
involve City Council action and the City would not have to control the content of the prayers.
Theoretically, the Council may forbid comment that pertains to subjects not under the
jurisdiction of the City Council, but it is not required to forbid prayer at that time. Prayer that
includes requests for the City leaders to exercise wisdom and judgment would certainly be a
topic that is within the jurisdiction of the City.
ATTACHMENT: Off Agenda Memorandum
001
•
lata o 1979
City Attorney's Memorandum-
Roy
emorandumRoy A. Hanley NOT CONFIDENTIAL
To: City Council, Wade McKinney
Re: Prayer at Council Meeting
During public comment at a recent council meeting the city council was asked to institute a
program involving invocations at the beginning of council meetings in the City of
Atascadero. This issue was most recently litigated in the case of Rubin v. City of Burbank
(2 002) 101 CA 4t" 1194.
•
In that case, the court ruled unconstitutional the practice of the City of Burbank beginning
each city council meeting with an invocation. The City of Burbank had done so since 1953.
"The invocation is usually given by a member of the Burbank Ministerial Association
(BMA), a non-denominational organization of clergy and representatives of other
organizations, such as the YMCA, whose members meet for the purpose of fellowship
among the religious leaders of the community." ... "It was the practice of the BMA to
circulate a sign-up sheet among its members for volunteers to give the council invocation.
The list of volunteers was provided to the city clerk who placed the name of a volunteer on
the agenda. Neither the city council nor the city clerk had any input in determining the
subject matter or content of the invocation. Although the members of the BMA agreed
among themselves that they would be respectful of their members various and diverse
beliefs, they imposed no restrictions on the content of the invocation."
The invocation, which was ruled unconstitutional, contained only the following sectarian
language: "We are grateful heavenly Father for all that thou has poured out on us and we
express our gratitude and our love in the name of Jesus Christ. Amen."
Oddly enough, it now seems clear that if a city wishes to have a constitutionally protected
invocation at the beginning of council meetings it must insert itself into the content of such
prayers. We would have to make sure, certainly; that no one invoked the name Jesus, and
likewise someone with the appropriate knowledge of all of the
002
• Memorandum
October 29, 2002
Page Two
potential faiths that might wish to make an invocation would have to help us make sure no
similar invocations were made by people of other faiths other than the Christian faith.
Likewise we would have to make sure that Muslims, Buddhists, Hindus, Bahais, Chumash,
and many other faiths are included.
In conclusion, it is possible to have invocation at council meetings in theory, but if this most
recent case is upheld through the Appellate Court process, it would take much staff time to
construct one and monitor prayers ahead of time.
•
003
DATE: 02/25/2003
is w'i A ti
n
1 8 1979
Atascadero City Council
Staff Report- City Manager's Office
Commission Appointments
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Council:
1. Introduce for first reading, by title only, the draft Ordinance, amending Section 2-9.02
and Section 2-13.03 of the Atascadero Municipal Code relating to the appointment of
Planning Commission Members and Parks and Recreation Commission Members; and,
2. Direct selected Council Members to appoint Commissioners, and the City Council to
approve the appointments.
•
DISCUSSION:
The City Council discussed the appointment process for Commission Members (Planning and
Parks and Recreation) during their strategic planning workshop. The Council directed staff to
bring forward an Ordinance that would amend the appointment process for commissioners. The
Ordinance would require a first and second reading followed by a thirty-day period before
becoming effective. Assuming the Council adopted the Ordinance it could become effective as
early as April l Otn
If the Ordinance is approved, the new process would be implemented over the next couple of
years as Commissioner terms expire to provide for an orderly transition. Each Council Member
would appoint one Commissioner to each of the Commissions and the whole Council would
appoint two members in the same manner as the Council currently makes appointments. The two
at-large positions would serve two-year terms commencing the 1St of February following the
municipal elections held in November of even years. Three Planning Commission positions are
either vacant or have a term that expired February 1, 2003. George Luna, Becky Pacas and
Wendy Scalise will make those appointments. The Parks and Recreation Commission has four
positions having terms that expired February 1, 2003. George Luna, Jerry Clay, Wendy Scalise
and Becky Pacas will make those appointments.
004
02/25/2003 _
At the Council's strategic planning session there was no discussion of removal of members by the
City Council or of procedures for filling vacancies. The current code allows removal of a •
commission member by a majority vote of the City Council. The City Attorney suggests that this
provision would remain the same but, in the event of a removal of a member that was directly
appointed, the originally appointing member fills the vacancy and not a majority of the City
Council. This helps avoid the problem of one commission member being subject to the direction
of one council member, but prevents a council member from having their ability to appoint
effectively removed by a simple majority of the City Council. The City Council is free to choose
to change the method of removal, but leaving it up to just the appointing council member may
pose legal as well as policy problems. The City Council may choose an alternate vacancy filling
mechanism, but that did not seem to fit the intent of the City Council in directing that a change in
the appointment procedures take place.
Current Commissioners may continue to serve until they are reappointed or a new member is
appointed. The Council can appoint members to the Commission as has been done in the past or
the selected Council Members could make their appointments and have them approved by the
whole Council.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
•
005
02/25/2003
• DRAFT ORDINANCE
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ATASCADERO AMENDING SECTION 2-9.02 OF THE ATASCADERO
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE APPOINTMENT OF
PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS AND REVISING SECTION
2-13.03 OF THE ATASCADERO MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE
APPOINTMENT OF RECREATION COMMISSION MEMBERS
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Atascadero has previously adopted codes for
the appointment of members to the Planning Commission and to the Parks and Recreation
Commission; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Atascadero finds that the following changes
to the Atascadero Municipal Code are reasonably necessary to promote the health, safety and
welfare of the citizens of Atascadero;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO does ordain
as follows:
Section 1. Atascadero Municipal Code section 2-9.02 is amended to read as follows:
• 2-9.02 Members: Appointment: Terms of office.
The City Council shall appoint members of the Planning Commission as follows: Two (2)
members shall be appointed by a majority vote of the entire Council. Those two positions shall
be appointed for terms of two years commencing February 1, 2005 and expiring January 31,
2007. Except as modified below the remaining five (5) members shall be directly appointed by
each individual City Council Member in the February following the election at which the City
Council member is elected. The terms of appointment for the directly appointed members of the
Planning Commission shall be four years and expire on January 31. Appointments may be made
after the commencement of a term to fill a vacancy or removal, in which case the term of office
shall be for the balance of the unexpired term. In the event that a member at large (appointed by a
majority vote of the entire Council) resigns or is removed, the vacancy shall be filled by a
majority vote of the entire City Council. In the event that a member directly appointed by a City
Council member resigns or is removed, the vacancy shall be filled by the individual City Council
member that made the appointment of the resigning or removed planning commission member.
In the event that the appointing City Council member has vacated office the appointment shall be
made by the City Council member appointed or elected to fulfill the term of the vacating City
Council member. In the event that the vacated City Council position has not been filled by
appointment or election, an appointment to the vacated planning commission term may, but does
not have to be, made by a majority vote of the entire Council. Any such appointment shall be for
the remainder of that unexpired term. All members shall serve at the pleasure of the City Council
• and may continue to serve after expiration of the stated term, with the approval of the City
Council,until such time as a successor is selected according to the procedures set for the above.
006
02/25/2003
Section 2. Atascadero Municipal Code section 2-13.03 is amended to read as follows: •
2-13.03 Members: Appointment: Terms of office.
The City Council shall appoint members of the Parks and Recreation Commission as follows:
Two (2) members shall be appointed by a majority vote of the entire Council. Those two
positions shall be appointed for terms of two years commencing February 1, 2005 and expiring
January 31, 2007. Except as modified below the remaining five (5) members shall be directly
appointed by each individual City Council Member in the February following the election at
which the City Council member is elected. The terms of appointment for the directly appointed
members of the Parks and Recreation Commission shall be four years and expire on January 31.
Appointments may be made after the commencement of a term to fill a vacancy or removal, in
which case the term of office shall be for the balance of the unexpired term. In the event that a
member at large (appointed by a majority vote of the entire Council) resigns or is removed, the
vacancy shall be filled by a majority vote of the entire City Council. In the event that a member
directly appointed by a City Council member resigns or is removed, the individual City Council
member that made the appointment of the resigning or removed commission member shall
appoint a new Commissioner to fill the vacancy. In the event that the appointing City Council
member has vacated office, the appointment shall be made by the City Council member
appointed or elected to fulfill the term of the vacating City Council member. In the event that the
vacated City Council position has not been filled by appointment or election, an appointment to
the vacated commission term may, but does not have to be, made by a majority vote of the entire
Council. Any such appointment shall be for the remainder of that unexpired term. All members
shall serve at the pleasure of the City Council and may continue to serve after expiration of the
stated term, with the approval of the City Council, until such time as a successor is selected
according to the procedures set for the above.
Section 3. All other provisions and sections of the Atascadero Municipal Code in effect on the
days preceding the passage of this ordinance shall remain in full force and effect upon passage of
this ordinance.
Section 4. This ordinance shall not be interpreted in any manner in conflict with controlling
provisions of state law, including without limitation, the Constitution of the State of California. If
any section, subsection or clause of this ordinance shall be deemed to be unconstitutional or
otherwise invalid, the validity of the remaining sections, subsections and clauses shall not be
affected thereby.
Section 5. Within fifteen (15) days after passage, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be
published one time in a newspaper of general circulation in the City. This ordinance is to become
effective thirty(30) days from the date of adoption.
007
02/25/2003
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF MARCH, 2002, by the following
• vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Jerry L. Clay, Sr., Mayor
ATTEST:
Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney
UUS
ITEM NUMBER: A-.1
DATE: 02/25/2003
19I$ 18 CITY OF ATASCADERO
CITY COUNCIL
DRAFT MINUTES
Tuesday, February 11, 2003
7:00 P.M.
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: 6:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION:
(Immediately following. Redevelopment Agency Meeting and . Closed
. Session)
1. PUBLIC COMMENT - CLOSED SESSION
2. Call to Order
a) Conference with legal counsel - Existing litigation (Govt. Code
Sec. 54956.9 (a))
1. Environmental Center of SLO v. City of Atascadero
b) Personnel: City Attorney (Govt. Code Sec. 54957.6)
3. Adjourn
4. CLOSED SESSION REPORT
Mayor Clay reported that City Attorney Roy Hanley received unanimous
support from the Council.
City Attorney Roy Hanley announced there was no reportable action on a)
1.
CC 02111/03
Page 1
U
ITEM NUMBER: A-1
DATE: 02/25/2003
REGULAR SESSION:
Mayor Clay called the meeting to order at 7:20 p.m., and Council Member Pacas
introduced Geremy Lopez from Boy Scout Troop #123 who led the Pledge of
Allegiance.
ROLL CALL:
Present: Council Members Pacas, O'Malley, Scalise, Luna and Mayor Clay
Absent: None
Others Present: City Clerk Marcia McClure Torgerson and City Treasurer Joseph
Modica
Staff Present: City Manager Wade McKinney, Assistant City Manger Brady
Cherry, Redevelopment Specialist John Jansons, Administrative
Services Director Rachelle Rickard, Public Works Director Steve
Kahn, Community Development Director Warren Frace, Information
Technology Director Andrew Fruin, Associate Planner Glenn Rider,
Police Lt. John Couch and City Attorney Roy Hanley.
•
APPROVAL OF AGENDA:
MOTION: By Mayor Pro Tem Luna and seconded by Council Member
Pacas to approve the agenda.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote.
PRESENTATIONS:
Presentations to Jonelle Norton and Dennis Schmidt were continued to the next City
Council meeting.
1. Proclamation declaring February 25, 2003 "Spay Day USA"
Council Member Luna read the proclamation and Mayor Clay presented the
proclamation.
Alicia Moran, Director of Development and Operations for North County Humane
Society, thanked the Council for their support. She also explained the spay-neuter
program in Atascadero.
CC 02/11/03
Page 2 Ulu
ITEM NUMBER: A-I
DATE: 02/25/2003
• 2. San Luis Obispo County Housing Trust Fund - Anita Robinson, Steering
Committee Chairperson
■ Staff recommendation: City Council:
1. Support, in concept, the development of an affordable housing trust fund and agree to
work with the SLO Housing Trust Fund to develop a future dedicated revenue source,
and;
2. Do not provide financial support for start-up costs at this time. [City Manager]
Anita Robinson gave the presentation and answered questions of Council.
PUBLIC COMMENT
George Moreland, Housing Authority SLO, stated he has over 30 years of experience in
this field and he is excited about the Trust Fund and it's potential.
Roxanne Carr, Division President Mortgage House, thanked Anita for her presentation
and stated she supports the Housing Trust Fund.
Eileen Allan, Executive Director North County Women's Shelter and Resource Center,
member of the San Luis Obispo Supportive Housing Consortium and Steering
Committee for the Housing Trust Fund, and resident of Atascadero, explained to the
Council how important affordable housing is to the Women's Shelter's clients and asked
. the Council to support the Trust Fund.
Reed Harris, Vice President of Development Midland Pacific Homes, stated his support
for the Housing Trust Fund.
Ray Belgams, Member of the Housing Consortium and Atascadero resident, asked the
Council to support the Trust Fund and provide financial support.
Joanne Main, Executive Director Atascadero Chamber of Commerce, asked the Council
to support the Trust Fund.
Mayor Clay closed the Public Comment period.
MOTION: By Mayor Pro Tem Luna and seconded by Council Member
Pacas that the Council support in concept the development of
an affordable housing trust fund and agree to work with the
SLO Housing Trust Fund to develop a future dedicated
revenue source.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote.
CC 02/11/03
Page 3
ITEM NUMBER: A- I
DATE: 02/25/2003
MOTION: By Mayor Pro Tem Luna and seconded by Council Member
O'Malley to direct staff to look for opportunities, as it prepared
the budget, for approximately $5,000 in start up costs for the
Housing Trust Fund, and to bring back those suggestions
when Council has its budget hearings.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote.
COMMUNITY FORUM:
Richard Hill, 8400 San Gabriel Road, asked to have the nuisance abatement complaint
for his property placed on a future Council agenda. He asked the Council to undue an
injustice that was done to his family. (Exhibit A)
Mayor Clay closed the Community Forum period.
COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS:
Mayor Clay asked the Council to discuss the filling of the vacancies on the Planning
Commission.
There was Council consensus to have staff bring back an action that would •
implement the decision made at the Strategic Planning Session for filling
vacancies on the Recreation Commission and the Planning Commission.
A. CONSENT CALENDAR:
1. City Council Minutes —January 14, 2003
■ City Clerk recommendation: City Council approve the City Council minutes of
January 14, 2003. [City Clerk]
2. City Council Minutes — Strategic Planning Workshop, January 28-29,
2003
■ City Clerk recommendation: City Council approve the City Council minutes of the
Strategic Planning Workshop held on January 28, 2003. [City Clerk]
3. City Treasurer's Report— December 2002
■ Fiscal impact: None
• City Treasurer recommendation: City Council approve the City Treasurer's report for
December 2002. [City Treasurer]
•
CC 02/11/03
Page 4 0 12
ITEM NUMBER: A- 1
DATE: 02/25/2003
• 4. December Disbursements — December 2002 Accounts Payable &
Payroll
■ Fiscal impact: $1,825,377.92.
■ Staff recommendation: City Council approve certified City accounts payable, payroll
and payroll vendor checks for December 2002. [Administrative Services]
5. Community Redevelopment Agency Annual Report for Fiscal-Year
2001-2002
■ Fiscal impact: None.
■ Staff recommendation: Council review and accept the Community Redevelopment
Agency Annual Report for fiscal year 2001-2002. [City Manager]
6. Final Parcel Map 2002-0026 (Parcel Map AT 99-306) - [TPM 2000-0001]
10450 Morro Road (Thomas)
■ Fiscal impact: None.
■ Staff recommendation: Council accept Final Parcel Map 2002-0026 (Parcel Map AT
99-306) [Public Works]
7. Final Parcel Map 2002-0041 - (Tract 2453) - [TTM 2001-0013] 2750 EI
Camino Real (Gearhart/Wilson)
■ Fiscal impact: None.
■ Staff recommendations: Council:
1. Accept Final Parcel Map 2002-0041 (Tract 2453)
2. Reject offer of dedication for Public Utility Easement without prejudice to future
• acceptance.
3. Authorize City Manager to execute Subdivision Agreement with Kelly Gearhart.
[Public Works]
8. Final Parcel Map 2002-0045 - (Tract 2479) - [TTM 2002-0017] 3200 EI
Camino Real (Gearhart/Wilson)
■ Fiscal impact: None.
■ Staff recommendations: Council:
1. Accept Final Parcel Map 2002-0045 (Tract 2479)
2. Reject offer of dedication for Street Purposes and Public Utility Easements
without prejudice to future acceptance.
3. Authorize City Manager to execute Subdivision Agreement with Kelly Gearhart.
[Public Works]
9. Zone Change 2002-0037 Code Text Amendment of Planned
Development #11 (3F Meadows Fire Protection Standards)
(Castlerock Development)
■ Fiscal impact: None.
■ Staff recommendation: Council adopt, on second reading by title only, the draft
Ordinance amending the fire protection standards of Planned Development#11.
[Community Development]
CC 02/11/03 1
Page 5
ITEM NUMBER: A- 1
DATE: 02/25/2003
10. 2002-2003 Annual Overlay Program - Bid No. 2002-007 •
■ Fiscal impact: $$6,000
■ Staff recommendation: Council:
1. Authorize Contract Change Order for $6,000 to Pavement Engineering, Inc. for
Inspection services.
2. Authorize Final Payment to Pavement Engineering, Inc. for Design and
Inspection services. [Public Works]
11. Acceptance of Proposals For Contract Plan Check Services - Bid No.
2002-010
■ Fiscal impact: Plan check contract will exceed $25,000 per year, paid by the building
plan check fee collected at time of permit submittal.
■ Staff recommendation: Council establish eligibility list and award contracts for plan
check services to California Code Check, Esgil Corporation, and Mike Whitaker.
[Community Development]
12. Final Parcel Map 2002-0036 — (ATAL 00-192)- [LLA 94005 ATAL 94-
002] [LLA 2000-0005 ATAL 00-192] 3-F Meadows (3-F
Meadows/Shetler)
■ Staff recommendation: City Council:
1. Accept Final Parcel Map 2002-0036 (ATAL 00-192)
2. Reject offers of dedication for streets and the dedication of Lots A, B, and C, and
Open Space Easements without prejudice to future acceptance.
3. Authorize City Manager to execute a Performance Agreement with Castlerock
Development. [Public Works] •
The following Consent Calendar Items were pulled:
Item #A-1 by Council Member O'Malley
Item #A-2 by Eric Greening
Item #A-11 by Council Member Scalise
Item #A-12 by Mayor Pro Tem Luna
Item #A-1: Council Member O'Malley referred to page 8 of the City Council Minutes of
January, 14, 2003, Item #E-City Council, and stated that his request was actually to
have a member of the City Council attend Main Street Board meetings, and not to sit
officially on the Board. He asked the City Clerk to review the tape and correct the
minutes if necessary.
MOTION: By Council Member O'Malley and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem
Luna to approve Items #A-1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote.
(Pacas abstained on Items #A-5, 7 and 8)
(Item #A-7 Contract No. 2003-002, Item #A-8 Contract No. 2003-
003)
Item #A-2: Eric Greening, 7365 Valle, commented that the Minutes for the Strategic
Planning Workshop were short on substance and asked by what means and when the
CC 02/11/03 4
Page 6
ITEM NUMBER: A- 1
DATE: 02/25/2003
• public could access the record of what was discussed. City Manager Wade McKinney
explained that the notes have been drafted and will be circulated as soon as they are
completed.
Item #A-11: Council Member Scalise asked for an explanation for the length of time
requested for the Plan Check Services. City Manager Wade McKinney stated that it
was an arbitrary assignment so that staff would have the opportunity to go back and
check prices; it can be done more often if Council would like.
MOTION: By Council Member Scalise and seconded by Council Member
O'Malley to approve Items #A-2 and 11.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote.
Item #A-12: Mayor Pro Tem Luna expressed his concerns regarding notification of the
public, and asked what procedures would apply to discrepancies in standards.
Community Development Director Frace addressed these issues.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Joan O'Keefe, 9985 Old Morro Road East, stated that the Master Plan of Development
does not comply with the mitigation requirements of the EIR for the project. She urged
Council to have the precise plans for the 20 lots, as they come in for approval, reviewed
• by the Planning Commission and placed on the City Council Consent Calendar for final
approval.
Ellen Beraud, 9608 Laurel Road, asked if the Final Map being approved tonight is the
same map that was approved in 1995. She asked if staff could give a presentation for
the public's benefit.
Mayor Clay closed the Public Comment period.
Mayor Clay asked staff to give a brief presentation to clarify the final map in Item #A-12.
Mr. Frace gave a brief presentation on the Final Map and Master Plan process and
answered questions of Council.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Joan O'Keefe clarified her use of the term precise plan and stated that there is a
difference between a plot plan and a precise plan.
Mayor Clay closed the Public Comment period.
•
CC 02/11/03
Page 7 015
ITEM NUMBER: A- I
DATE: 02/25/2003
MOTION: By Council Member Scalise and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem •
Luna to accept the final parcel map 2002-003, and to reject the
offers of dedication for streets and the dedication of Lots A, B,
and C, and Open Space Easements without prejudice to future
acceptance, and to Authorize City Manager to execute a
Performance Agreement with Castlerock Development.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote.
Mayor Clay recessed the hearing at 8:43 p.m.
Mayor Clay called the meeting back to order at 8:54 p.m.
B. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. Zone Change 2002-0031 / Conditional Use Permit 2002-0089 /
Tentative Tract Map 2002-0015 (#2460) — 9105 & 9127 San Diego Road
(Mehring / Twin Cities Surveys)
■ Fiscal impact: The project would likely have a slight negative impact on City
revenues. As a general rule, single-family dwellings require services that exceed the
revenue generated by the dwelling.
■ Planning Commission recommendations:
1. Adopt Draft Resolution A, certifying proposed Negative Declaration 2002-0046
prepared for Zone Change 2002-0031 and Tentative Tract Map 2002-0015; and,
2. Introduce Draft Ordinance A, for first reading by title only, to approve Zone
Change 2002-0031; and amend the City's Zoning Map to add a PD-16 overlay
district to the project area.
3. Adopt Draft Resolution B, approving the Conditional Use Permit 2002-0089, a
Master Plan of Development for the project site consistent with PD-16; and,
4. Adopt Draft Resolution C, approving Tentative Tract Map 2002-0015, a request
to subdivide a 10-acre and a 4-acre lot into five parcels; three at 2.69 acres, one
at 2.93 acres, and one at 3.03 acres, all acreages gross, based on findings and
subject to conditions. [Community Development]
Community Development Director Warren Frace gave the staff report and answered
questions of Council.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Will Mehring, applicant, thanked staff for their presentation and explained to the Council
his concerns with the Planning Commission's recommendations.
Mayor Clay closed the Public Comment period.
Council Member Scalise expressed concern regarding what appears to be a
discrepancy between what the Planning Commission recommended regarding the open
CC 02/11/03 c
Page 8 �I 16
ITEM NUMBER: A- 1
DATE: 02/25/2003
space easement and what has been presented to Council this evening. She
recommended tabling this item until there is clarification.
MOTION: By Council Member O'Malley and seconded by Council
Member Pacas to adopt Draft Resolution A, certifying
proposed Negative Declaration 2002-0046 prepared for Zone
Change 2002-0031 and Tentative Tract Map 2002-0015; and,
introduce Draft Ordinance A, for first reading by title only, to
approve Zone Change 2002-0031 and amend the City's Zoning
Map to add a PD-16 overlay district to the project area; and,
adopt Draft Resolution B, approving the Conditional Use
Permit 2002-0089, a Master Plan of Development for the project
site consistent with PD-16; and, adopt Draft Resolution C,
approving Tentative Tract Map 2002-0015, a request to
subdivide a 10-acre and a 4-acre lot into five parcels; three at
2.69 acres, one at 2.93 acres, and one at 3.03 acres, all
acreages gross, based on findings and subject to conditions;
and adopting staff recommendation of open space easement
to be expanded to cover the entire frontage of lot #5, which is
approximately one acre.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. (Draft Resolution A-
Resolution No. 2003-001, Draft Resolution - B Resolution No.
• 2003-002, Draft Resolution C - Resolution No. 2003-003)
C. MANAGEMENT REPORTS:
1. Mid-Year Budget Review
■ Fiscal impact: Revenue Increase$130,000, Additional Appropriations of$90,000.
■ Staff recommendation: Council adopt the attached draft Resolution amending the
2002-03 Budget. [Administrative Services]
Administrative Services Director Rachelle Rickard gave the staff report and answered
questions of Council.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Eric Greening asked if there is a schedule for budget preparation.
City Manager Wade McKinney stated he expected the State budget to be adopted after
the City adopts its budget.
Mayor Clay closed the Public Comment period.
CC 02/11/03
Page 9 C
ITEM NUMBER: A-1
DATE: 02/25/2003
MOTION: By Mayor Pro Tem Luna and seconded by Council Member i
O'Malley to adopt the draft Resolution amending the 2002-03
Budget.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. (Resolution No. 2003-004)
2. Atascadero Road Program
■ Fiscal impact: $40,000.00 funded from Public Works Street Maintenance Operating
Supplies and Contract Services accounts. $50,000 for Assessment District creation
(in FY 2002-2003 budget).
■ Staff recommendations: City Council:
1. Receive an updated report on the Atascadero Road Program.
2. Review the Local Road Priority List and direct staff on the spring of 2003 Local
Road paving.
3. Direct Staff on the Assessment District formation process. [Public Works]
Public Works Director Steve Kahn gave the staff report and answered questions of the
Council.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Daphne Fahsing, asked about the status of Portola Road from Morro Road to San
Marcus. She asked that it be added to the list.
Ray Belgams indicated that her street, Encinal, was included and she would favor the 40
second assessment while going for the first.
Larry Kosnik, Cortina Avenue, stated the residents of his street have signed a petition
and asked to be included in the process of forming an assessment district.
Mayor Clay closed the Public Comment period,
MOTION: By Council Member Scalise and seconded by Council Member
O'Malley to receive the updated report on the Atascadero Road
Program and the review process of the local priority list, and
to direct staff to move forward to the next phase on the
assessment districts.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote
CC 02/11/03
Page 10
ITEM NUMBER: A- 1
DATE: 02/25/2003
MOTION: By Council Member Pacas and seconded by Council Member
O'Malley to adopt the recommended Assessment District
alternatives as follows:
1. Maintain the current policy, not accepting the roads for
maintenance and requiring that a second assessment
district be passed to take care of future maintenance. The
City would receive the funds and be responsible to
complete the maintenance. The cost to the property owners
would not be very high since little maintenance would be
required for the first six years and maintenance, when done
on a regular basis, is not expensive; and,
2. Do not accept the roads for maintenance and do not require
that a second Assessment District be passed to take care
of future maintenance. The roads would not be maintained
once the improvements are complete, unless the owner
provided the maintenance in the future.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote.
D. COMMITTEE & LIAISON REPORTS:
. Mayor Clay
1. County Mayor's Round Table: Officials from the League went over the State's budget
problems and made suggestions. Atascadero will be hosting the Mayor's Round Table in
June.
Mayor Pro Tem Luna
1. Integrated Waste Management Authority (IWMA): Staff will be coming forward on the next
agenda with the proposal to make the IWMA the Local Enforcement Agency.
Council Member Scalise
1. S.L.O. Council of Governments (SLOCOG)/S.L.O. Regional Transit Authority (SLORTA):
SLOCOG is still trying to determine what State monies and Federal opportunities may exist.
It was decided to have SLOCOG meetings broadcast on cable.
Council Member O'Malley
1. Air Pollution Control District (APCD): Will be having an orientation meeting for new
members.
2. Economic Vitality Corporation, Board of Directors (EVC): There is a good loan guarantee
program that benefits local businesses; he hopes to do an extended report on this in the
future.
Council Member Pacas
1. Atascadero Youth Task Force: The Assistance League of SLO County hosted a fundraiser
last weekend, and Council Member Pacas congratulated the Assistance League on the work
it is doing to help local youth. She listed several other upcoming events to benefit local
• youth.
CC 02/11/03
Page 11
ITEM NUMBER: A- 1
DATE: 02/25/2003
E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION:
City Council
Council Member Scalise asked what the status is with the issue of prayer at
Council meetings.
There was Council consensus to have staff bring this item back for a future
meeting.
F. ADJOURNMENT:
Mayor Clay adjourned the meeting at 10:02 p.m. to the next regularly scheduled
meeting on February 25, 2003.
MEETING RECORDED AND MINUTES PREPARED BY:
Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk
•
The following exhibits are available for review in the City Clerk's office.
Exhibit A — Prepared statement, Richard Hill
CC 02/11/03
Page 12 V
ITEM NUMBER: A _ 2
•
DATE: 02/2512003
n
1 79 e
A'�.srAn'�oi
Staff Report-Administrative Services Department
JANUARY 2003 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE & PAYROLL
RECOMMENDATION
Approve certified City accounts payable,payroll and payroll vendor checks for January 2003.
DISCUSSION
Attached for City Council review and approval are the following:
Payroll
Dated 1/2/03 Checks# 16071 - 16163 $ 107,817.34
Direct Deposits 74,893.01
• Dated 1/16/03 Checks# 16164 - 16282 126,026.29
Direct Deposits 93,123.66
Dated 1/30/03 Checks# 16283 - 16382 111,773.49
Direct Deposits 75,275.55
Accounts Payable
Dated January 1-31, 2003 Checks # 87836 - 88263 &EFTs 187-189 881,554.00
TOTAL AMOUNT $ 1,470,463.34
FISCAL IMPACT
Total expenditures for all funds is $ 1,470,463.34
CERTIFICATION
The undersigned certifies that the attached demands have been released for payment and
that funds are available for these demands.
Rachelle Rickard,Administrative Services Director
Approved by the City Council at a meeting held February 25, 2003.
i
Marcia M.Torgerson,City Clerk
ATTACHMENT: January 2003 Eden Warrant Register in the amount of $ 881,554.00
City of Ataseadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of January 2003
Check Check
Number Date Vendor Description Amount
87836 1/2/2003 ATASCADERO MAIN STREET Accounts Payable Check 13 750.00
87837 1/2/2003 DIAMOND MANUFACTURING,INC. Accounts Payable Check 1,063.50
87838 1/2/2003 SIGN OUTLET Accounts Payable Check 1,513.25
87839 1/2/2003 STERLING COMMUNICATIONS Accounts Payable Check 733.04
187 1/3/2003 MID-STATE BANK Accounts Payable Check 147.99
87840 1/3/2003 ATASCADERO FIRE DEPT EMP.ASSN Payroll Vendor Payment 240.00
87841 1/3/2003 ATASCADERO MID MGRS ORG UNION Payroll Vendor Payment 30.00
87842 1/3/2003 ATASCADERO POLICE OFFICERS ASN Payroll Vendor Payment 376.00
87843 1/3/2003 COUNTY-CITY EMPLOYEES CU Payroll Vendor Payment 625.00
87844 1/3/2003 EMPLOYMENT DEV DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 6,987.60
87845 1/3/2003 EMPLOYMENT DEV.DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 758.68
87846 1/3/2003 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Payroll Vendor Payment 46.98
87847 1/3/2003 FAMILY SUPPORT DIVISION Payroll Vendor Payment 369.23
87848 1/3/2003 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE Payroll Vendor Payment 5,769.14
87849 1/3/2003 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 Payroll Vendor Payment 500.00
87850 1/3/2003 KENNEDY CLUB FITNESS Payroll Vendor Payment 79.50
87851 1/3/2003 PERS LONG TERM CARE PROGRAM Payroll Vendor Payment 30
87852 1/3/2003 PUBLIC EMPL RETIREMENT SYSTEM Payroll Vendor Payment 19,349.29
87853 1/3/2003 SEIU LOCAL 620 AFL-CIO Payroll Vendor Payment 558.47
87854 1/3/2003 UNITED WAY OF SLO COUNTY Payroll Vendor Payment 38.00
87855 1/3/2003 WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK Payroll Vendor Payment 700.12
188 1/7/2003 MID-STATE BANK Payroll Vendor Payment 32,365.78
87856 1/9/2003 NAPA VALLEY COLLEGE Accounts Payable Check 60.00
87857 1/9/2003 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE CO Payroll Vendor Payment ` 773.61
87858 1/9/2003 COLONIAL LIFE&ACCIDENT INS. Payroll Vendor Payment 1,508.63
87859 1/9/2003 CPIC LIFE Payroll Vendor Payment 1,567.60
87860 1/9/2003 DELTA DENTAL,ATTN:ACCOUNTING Payroll Vendor Payment 7,147.36
87861 1/9/2003 EQUITABLE LIFE Payroll Vendor Payment 348.88
87862 1/10/2003 ABBEY GROUP CONSULTANTS Accounts Payable Check 33,375.14
87863 1/10/2003 ALL AMERICAN SEWER TOOLS Accounts Payable Check 215.32
87864 1/10/2003 BRIAN ALLEE Accounts Payable Check 44.53
87865 1/10/2003 AMERICAN ZOO AND AQUARIUM ASSC Accounts Payable Check 175.00
87866 1/10/2003 ANTS AUTO GLASS Accounts Payable Check 140
U4r.4
City of Ataseadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of January 2003
Check Check
Alftumb Date Vendor Description Amount
87868 1/10/2003 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES Accounts Payable Check ' 767.99
87869 1/10/2003 ATASCADERO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Accounts Payable Check 21 033.75
87870 1/10/2003 ATASCADERO FORD Accounts Payable Check 1475.35
,
87871 1/10/2003 ATASCADERO GLASS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 495.00
87872 1/10/2003 ATASCADERO LOAVES&FISHES Accounts Payable Check 3500.00
,
87874 1/10/2003 ATASCADERO MUTUAL WATER CO. Accounts Payable Check 3649.85
,
87875 1/10/2003 ATASCADERO NEWS Accounts Payable Check 908.70
87876 1/10/2003 AVAYA INC. Accounts Payable Check 22.41
87877 1/10/2003 LISA BARR Accounts Payable Check 140.00
87878 1/10/2003 CINDY K.BENSON Accounts Payable Check 611.67
87879 1/10/2003 JACK BRIDWELL Accounts Payable Check 200.00
87880 1/10/2003 BUENA GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 1,300.00
87881 1/10/2003 BUSHMASTER FIREARMS,INC Accounts Payable Check 444.55
87882 1/10/2003 DALE A.BYWATER Accounts Payable Check 3,995.00
87883 1/10/2003 CAL-COAST REFRIGERATION,INC Accounts Payable Check 180.88
87884 1/10/2003 CALIF CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Accounts Payable Check 284.66
87885 1/10/2003 CALIFORNIA CODE CHECK Accounts Payable Check 3,715.88
. 87886 1/10/2003 CALIFORNIA INTERNET CONNECTION Accounts Payable Check 309.85
87887 1/10/2003 CALIFORNIA PEACE OFFICERS ASSN Accounts Payable Check 170.00
87888 1/10/2003 DENNIS CAMMACK Accounts Payable Check 50.00
87889 1/10/2003 ANGEL CANNON Accounts Payable Check 140.00
87890 1/10/2003 CANNON ASSOCIATES Accounts Payable Check 3,127.56
87891 1/10/2003 CHANNEL COUNTIES DIVISION Accounts Payable Check 100.00
87892 1/10/2003 BRADY CHERRY Accounts Payable Check 300.00
87893 1/10/2003 CHEVRON Accounts Payable Check 424.46
87894 1/10/2003 CHICAGO GRADE LANDFILL,INC. Accounts Payable Check 145.00
87895 1/10/2003 CJP PRODUCTIONS Accounts Payable Check 2,300.00
87896 1/10/2003 JERRY L.CLAY Accounts Payable Check 75.00
87897 1/10/2003 CLEAN WATER SYSTEMS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 35.00
87898 1/10/2003 COASTLINE EQUIPMENT Accounts Payable Check 367.94
87899 1/10/2003 COMM-NET 2000 Accounts Payable Check 44.00
87900 1/10/2003 COMPUTER 1 PRODUCTS Accounts Payable Check 154.08
87901 1/10/2003 COUNTRY COPY Accounts Payable Check 48.26
87902 1/10/2003 COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO Accounts Payable Check 162.00
• 87903 1/10/2003 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER Accounts Payable Check 61.75
87904 1/10/2003 DARRYL'S LOCK AND SAFE Accounts Payable Check 86.81
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of January 2003
Check Check
Number Date Vendor Description Amount
87905 1/10/2003 KELLY DAVIS Accounts Payable Check 162.3
87906 1/10/2003 SANDRA N.DEAL PH.D. Accounts Payable Check 580.00
87907 1/10/2003 DECOU LUMBER COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 1,414.43
87908 1/10/2003 CHERYL DEJONG Accounts Payable Check 4.59
87909 1/10/2003 DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY&FIRE Accounts Payable Check 155.00
87910 1/10/2003 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Accounts Payable Check 66.00
87911 1/10/2003 DOGGIE WALK BAGS COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 831.13
87912 1/10/2003 EL CAMINO BUILDING SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 69.72
87913 1/10/2003 GEOFF ENGLISH Accounts Payable Check 200.00
87914 1/10/2003 JENNIFER FANNING Accounts Payable Check 140.00
87915 1/10/2003 FEDERAL EXPRESS Accounts Payable Check 22.62
87916 1/10/2003 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES,INC. Accounts Payable Check 429.00
87917 1/10/2003 FERRELL'S AUTO REPAIR Accounts Payable Check 800.13
87918 1/10/2003 FGL ENVIRONMENTAL Accounts Payable Check 318.60
87919 1/10/2003 FISHER SCIENTIFIC Accounts Payable Check 384.39
87920 1/10/2003 FOOD FOR LESS Accounts Payable Check 201.98
87921 1/10/2003 FOX&SOHAGI,LLP Accounts Payable Check 367.7
6
87922 1/10/2003 WARREN FRACE Accounts Payable Check 300.
87923 1/10/2003 GAS COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 83.74
87924 1/10/2003 GATEWAY COMPANIES,INC. Accounts Payable Check 2,289.78
87925 1/10/2003 GEM AUTO PARTS Accounts Payable Check 983.59
87926 1/10/2003 GENERAL HOSPITAL Accounts Payable Check 124.00
87927 1/10/2003 GILBERT'S LANDSCAPES Accounts Payable Check 935.00
87928 1/10/2003 GRISANTI HARDWARE Accounts Payable Check 194.65
87929 1/10/2003 HANSON AGGREGATES MID-PACIFIC Accounts Payable Check 164.99
87930 1/10/2003 HART IMPRESSIONS PRINT© Accounts Payable Check 328.65
87931 1/10/2003 HIGH TECHNOLOGY CRIME INVESTIG Accounts Payable Check 40.00
87933 1/10/2003 I.M.P.A.C.GOVERNMENT SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 2,718.02
87934 1/10/2003 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Accounts Payable Check 123.00
87935 1/10/2003 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF Accounts Payable Check 463.19
87936 1/10/2003 JESPERSEN'S TIRE SERVICE,INC. Accounts Payable Check 565.13
87937 1/10/2003 JIFFY LUBE#1932 PCJL,INC. Accounts Payable Check 254.08
87938 1/10/2003 JIM'S CAMPUS CAMERA Accounts Payable Check 50.15
87939 1/10/2003 STEVEN KAHN Accounts Payable Check 300.00
87940 1/10/2003 KINETIC ENGINEERING Accounts Payable Check 600.0
X24
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of January 2003
Check Check
Aftumber Date Vendor Description Amount
87941 1/10/2003 KIQO 104.5 FM Accounts Payable Check 399.00
87942 1/10/2003 KATE KREMKE Accounts Payable Check 140.00
87943 1/10/2003 L.N.CURTIS&SONS Accounts Payable Check 188.98
87944 1/10/2003 LAIDLAW TRANSIT SERVICES,INC. Accounts Payable Check 12 362.25
87945 1/10/2003 LAW OFFICE OF STEPHEN BECKER Accounts Payable Check 1,216.47
87946 1/10/2003 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES Accounts Payable Check 7,985.00
87947 1/10/2003 LEE WILSON ELECTRIC CO.INC Accounts Payable Check 1,687.97
87948 1/10/2003 LIFE ASSIST,INC. Accounts Payable Check 469.70
87949 1/10/2003 GEORGE W.LUNA Accounts Payable Check 75.00
87950 1/10/2003 LYNDON'S AUTOMOTIVE Accounts Payable Check 88.40
87951 1/10/2003 LYNN PEAVEY COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 344.85
87952 1/10/2003 SHARON MARINI Accounts Payable Check 50.00
87953 1/10/2003 WADE MCKINNEY Accounts Payable Check 560.00
87954 1/10/2003 MID-COAST GEOTECHNICAL,INC. Accounts Payable Check 150.00
87955 1/10/2003 MID-COAST MOWER&SAW Accounts Payable Check 2,146.85
87956 1/10/2003 MIDTOWN SPORTS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 125.48
87957 1/10/2003 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE Accounts Payable Check 760.07
. 87958 1/10/2003 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 207.45
87959 1/10/2003 DAVID MUEHLHAUSEN Accounts Payable Check 32.16
87960 1/10/2003 MUNIMETRIX SYSTEMS CORPORATION Accounts Payable Check 480.00
87961 1/10/2003 MUSIC FACTORY Accounts Payable Check 375.30
87962 1/10/2003 NFHS CUSTOMER SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 69.90
87963 1/10/2003 NORTH COAST ENGINEERING INC. Accounts Payable Check 15,256.83
87964 1/10/2003 NORTHERN ENERGY Accounts Payable Check 16.14
87965 1/10/2003 NORTHWEST BUSINESS STAMP Accounts Payable Check 69.75
87966 1/10/2003 THOMAS P.O'MALLEY Accounts Payable Check 75.00
87967 1/10/2003 OUTLET TOOL SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 126.78
87968 1/10/2003 BECKY J.PACAS Accounts Payable Check 75.00
87969 1/10/2003 PACIFIC BELL/WORLDCOM Accounts Payable Check 130.12
87970 1/10/2003 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC Accounts Payable Check 26.88
87971 1/10/2003 PASO ROBLES WELDING Accounts Payable Check 119.24
87972 1/10/2003 PAVEMENT ENGINEERING,INC. Accounts Payable Check 3,705.00
87973 1/10/2003 PC MAGAZINE Accounts Payable Check 39.97
87974 1/10/2003 PC MALL Accounts Payable Check 256.08
• 87975 1/10/2003 PFLUM'S ATASCADERO MUFFLER Accounts Payable Check 141.16
87976 1/10/2003 PITNEY BOWES,INC. Accounts Payable Check 142.65
625
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of January 2003
Check Check
Number Date Vendor Description Amount
87977 1/10/2003 POSTAL PRIVILEGE Accounts Payable Check 200.
0
87978 1/10/2003 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION,INC. Accounts Payable Check 20.62
87979 1/10/2003 PRO MOTION Accounts Payable Check 2,411.25
87980 1/10/2003 GRACE L.PUCCI Accounts Payable Check , 165.00
87981 1/10/2003 QUILL CORPORATION Accounts Payable Check 2,880.86
87982 1/10/2003 QUINN RENTAL SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 246.30
87983 1/10/2003 RADIO SHACK Accounts Payable Check 174.25
87984 1/10/2003 RAINBOW MEALWORMS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 101.29
87985 1/10/2003 REMARKABLE PRODUCTS Accounts Payable Check 26.90
87986 1/10/2003 RACHELLE RICKARD Accounts Payable Check 388.67
87987 1/10/2003 SAFETY-KLEEN INC. Accounts Payable Check 181.35
87988 1/10/2003 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY CLERK Accounts Payable Check 10,527.31
87989 1/10/2003 SAN LUIS PAINTS Accounts Payable Check 226.83
87990 1/10/2003 SAN LUIS SECURITY Accounts Payable Check 128.00
87991 1/10/2003 SANDS LIQUOR&DELI Accounts Payable Check 204.47
87992 1/10/2003 SANTA MARIA TIRE,INC. Accounts Payable Check 734.28
87993 1/10/2003 WENDY SCALISE Accounts Payable Check 75.0
87994 1/10/2003 SCOTT O'BRIEN FIRE&SAFETY CO Accounts Payable Check 492.jb
87995 1/10/2003 SHELL OIL COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 70.86
87996 1/10/2003 SIR SPEEDY Accounts Payable Check 167.52
87997 1/10/2003 SLO COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT Accounts Payable Check 60.00
87998 1/10/2003 SAFETY EQUIPMENT SOLON FIRE CONTROL FIRE& Accounts Payable Check 275.07
87999 1/10/2003 SOLUTIONS 4 SURE.COM,INC. Accounts Payable Check 579.20
88000 1/10/2003 SOUZA CONSTRUCTION INC. Accounts Payable Check 33 710.33
88001 1/10/2003 KURT W.STONE Accounts Payable Check 20.00
88002 1/10/2003 MICHAEL STORNETTA Accounts Payable Check 480.50
88003 1/10/2003 SUPERIOR QUALITY COPIERS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 417.07
88004 1/10/2003 SWITZER DIESEL REPAIR Accounts Payable Check 220.00
88005 1/10/2003 TEMPLETON UNIFORMS Accounts Payable Check 825.86
88006 1/10/2003 TOMARK SPORTS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 989.46
88007 1/10/2003 TRIBUNE Accounts Payable Check 983.83
88008 1/10/2003 TRIBUNE Accounts Payable Check 156.00
88009 1/10/2003 U.S.POSTMASTER Accounts Payable Check 659.67
88010 1/10/2003 UC REGENTS Accounts Payable Check 35.70
88011 1/10/2003 UNION ASPHALT,INC. Accounts Payable Check 13 817.0
2b-
City of Ataseadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of January 2003
Check Check
mber Date Vendor Description Amount
88012 1/10/2003 UNISOURCE MAINT SUPPLY SYSTEMS Accounts Payable Check 693.33
88013 1/10/2003 UNITED GREEN MARK,INC. Accounts Payable Check 397.65
88014 1/10/2003 USA BLUE BOOK Accounts Payable Check 977.62
88015 1/10/2003 JEFF VAN DEN EIKHOF Accounts Payable Check 173.38
88016 1/10/2003 VERIZON WIRELESS Accounts Payable Check 29.61
88017 1/10/2003 VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS Accounts Payable Check 123.83
88018 1/10/2003 VONS Accounts Payable Check 343.76
88019 1/10/2003 NANCY E.WEBBER,PH.D. Accounts Payable Check 290.00
88020 1/10/2003 WILLIAM P.WHITE Accounts Payable Check 27.20
88021 1/10/2003 WISCONSIN DNR Accounts Payable Check 7.00
88022 1/10/2003 MICKI WRIGHT Accounts Payable Check 100.00
88023 1/10/2003 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES,INC. Accounts Payable Check 205.10
88024 1/16/2003 THOMAS E.GANDY Accounts Payable Check - 416.44
88025 1/16/2003 SPECIALTY CONSTRUCTION,INC. Accounts Payable Check 99 434.07
88026 1/16/2003 RICHARD&LISA STICKLER Accounts Payable Check 60.06
88027 1/17/2003 ATASCADERO FIRE DEPT EMP.ASSN Payroll Vendor Payment 240.00
• 88028 1/17/2003 ATASCADERO FIRE RESERVES ASSN Payroll Vendor Payment 55.00
88029 1/17/2003 ATASCADERO MID MGRS ORG UNION Payroll Vendor Payment 30.00
88030 1/17/2003 ATASCADERO POLICE OFFICERS ASN Payroll Vendor Payment 364.25
88031 1/17/2003 BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA Payroll Vendor Payment 67 105.56
88032 1/17/2003 COUNTY-CITY EMPLOYEES CU Payroll Vendor Payment 625.00
88033 1/17/2003 EMPLOYMENT DEV DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 11 130.37
88034 1/17/2003 EMPLOYMENT DEV.DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 869.97
88035 1/17/2003 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Payroll Vendor Payment 46.98
88036 1/17/2003 FAMILY SUPPORT DIVISION Payroll Vendor Payment 369.23
88037 1/17/2003 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE Payroll Vendor Payment 9 921.14
88038 1/17/2003 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 Payroll Vendor Payment 400.00
88039 1/17/2003 KENNEDY CLUB FITNESS Payroll Vendor Payment 79.50
88040 1/17/2003 PERS LONG TERM CARE PROGRAM Payroll Vendor Payment 32.31
88041 1/17/2003 PUBLIC EMPL RETIREMENT SYSTEM Payroll Vendor Payment 19,369.57
88042 1/17/2003 SEIU LOCAL 620 AFL-CIO Payroll Vendor Payment 556.17
88043 1/17/2003 UNITED WAY OF SLO COUNTY Payroll Vendor Payment 38.00
88044 1/17/2003 WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK Payroll Vendor Payment 814.57
• 189 1/21/2003 MID-STATE BANK Payroll Vendor Payment 46,902.49
i1 .7
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of January 2003
Check Check
Number Date Vendor ' Description Amount
88045 1/23/2003 CITY OF BUELLTON Accounts Payable Check 75.
88046 1/23/2003 PAULA ANTON Accounts Payable Check 100.00
88047 1/23/2003 MATTHEW J.MIRANDA Accounts Payable Check 510.80
88048 1/23/2003 NORTH NET FIRE TRAINING CENTER Accounts Payable Check 325.00
88049 1/24/2003 A-1 METAL AND AUTO SALVAGE Accounts Payable Check 2,040.00
88050 1/24/2003 LINDA ABARCA Accounts Payable Check 40.00
88051 1/24/2003 ALBERT ABERCROMBIE Accounts Payable Check 535.00
88052 1/24/2003 ACTION FAX&PRINTER Accounts Payable Check 71.86
88053 1/24/2003 ACTION TOWING Accounts Payable Check 25.00
88054 1/24/2003 DOROTHY J.ADAMS Accounts Payable Check 200.00
88055 1/24/2003 ADAMSKI,MOROSKI,MADDEN,&GREEN Accounts Payable Check 2,800.00
88056 1/24/2003 AIR RITE REFRIGERATION Accounts Payable Check 90.72
88057 1/24/2003 ALBERTSONS Accounts Payable Check 441.57
88058 1/24/2003 MIKE ALOI Accounts Payable Check 100.00
88059 1/24/2003 AMERICAN SANITATION Accounts Payable Check 64.35
88060 1/24/2003 ANDERSON'S AUTO SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 70.00
88061 1/24/2003 ANTECH DIAGNOSTICS Accounts Payable Check 165
88062 1/24/2003 PAULA ANTON Accounts Payable Check 230
88063 1/24/2003 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 319.72
88064 1/24/2003 ARCH Accounts Payable Check 1,503.18
88065 1/24/2003 AT&T Accounts Payable Check 44.13
88066 1/24/2003 ATASCADERO BATTERY EXCHANGE Accounts Payable Check 38.57
88067 1/24/2003 ATASCADERO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Accounts Payable Check 3,110.00
88068 1/24/2003 ATASCADERO FORD Accounts Payable Check 1,239.71
88069 1/24/2003 ATASCADERO GLASS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 278.69
88070 1/24/2003 ATASCADERO HAY&FEED Accounts Payable Check 20.75
88071 1/24/2003 ATASCADERO NEWS Accounts Payable Check 339.20
88072 1/24/2003 CATHERINE BEACH Accounts Payable Check 236.08
88073 1/24/2003 BILLOW'S CUSTOM EMBROIDERY Accounts Payable Check 40.22
88074 1/24/2003 BIOMEDICAL CLINICAL ENGINEER Accounts Payable Check 150.00
88075 1/24/2003 BLUE RIDGE MEDICAL INC Accounts Payable Check 126.25
88076 1/24/2003 BOARD OF EQUALIZATION Accounts Payable Check 282.00
88077 1/24/2003 JEFF BRAZZI Accounts Payable Check 40.00
88078 1/24/2003 GREG BRAZZI Accounts Payable Check 40.00
88079 1/24/2003 BRENDLER JANITORIAL SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 900
E �ar
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of January 2003
Check Check
umber Date Vendor Description Amount
88080 1/24/2003 JACK BRIDWELL Accounts Payable Check 640.00
88081 1/24/2003 BROWN AND CALDWELL Accounts Payable Check 19 580.63
88082 1/24/2003 C&D TOWING&TRUCK SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 230.75
88083 1/24/2003 CAL-COAST REFRIGERATION,INC Accounts Payable Check 1,098.26
88084 1/24/2003 CAL-STATE AUTO GLASS Accounts Payable Check 176.81
88085 1/24/2003 CALACT Accounts Payable Check 225.00
88086 1/24/2003 CALIF FIRE CHIEFS ASSC Accounts Payable Check 100.00
88087 1/24/2003 CCAPA Accounts Payable Check 90.00
88088 1/24/2003 CELLULAR ONE Accounts Payable Check 928.09
88089 1/24/2003 CENTRAL COAST LOCK&KEY Accounts Payable Check 1,571.25
88090 1/24/2003 CENTRAL COAST PROPANE,INC. Accounts Payable Check 1.00
88091 1/24/2003 CFCA-EMS SECTION SOUTHERN DIV Accounts Payable Check 150.00
88092 1/24/2003 CHEM CLEAN Accounts Payable Check 64.50
88093 1/24/2003 CHEM SERVE Accounts Payable Check 207.42
88094 1/24/2003 CHEVRON Accounts Payable Check 935.46
88095 1/24/2003 CHEVRON Accounts Payable Check 4,600.42
88096 1/24/2003 CHIEF SUPPLY,INC. Accounts Payable Check 60.59
• 88097 1/24/2003 COASTAL IMAGING SUPPLIES Accounts Payable Check 39.50
88098 1/24/2003 COASTLINE EQUIPMENT Accounts Payable Check 68.00
88099 1/24/2003 COLONY CARPETS Accounts Payable Check 499.00
88100 1/24/2003 VINCE CONDE Accounts Payable Check 204.00
88101 1/24/2003 LISA CONKLIN Accounts Payable Check 112.85
88102 1/24/2003 CONWAY DISTRIBUTORS Accounts Payable Check 122.68
88103 1/24/2003 CIMON CORMIER Accounts Payable Check 68.00
88104 1/24/2003 COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO Accounts Payable Check 431.50
88105 1/24/2003 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER Accounts Payable Check 137.75
88106 1/24/2003 CUESTA COLLEGE Accounts Payable Check 151.41
88107 1/24/2003 CUESTA EQUIPMENT Accounts Payable Check 157.83
88108 1/24/2003 KENNY DAHLEN Accounts Payable Check 20.00
88111 1/24/2003 DANCRIS TELECOM Accounts Payable Check 300.59
88112 1/24/2003 DARRYL'S LOCK AND SAFE Accounts Payable Check 557.29
88113 1/24/2003 DECOU LUMBER COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 118.27
88114 1/24/2003 CHERYL DEJONG Accounts Payable Check 10.73
88115 1/24/2003 MARC B.DESERVI Accounts Payable Check 130.00
• 88116 1/24/2003 ECONOMIC VITALITY CORP OF SLO Accounts Payable Check 247.50
88117 1/24/2003 ED'S FLY MEAT,INC. Accounts Payable Check 71.00
614,019
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of January 2003
Check Check
Number Date Vendor Description Amount
88118 1/24/2003 EDEN SYSTEMS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 14,198.
88119 1/24/2003 EXXON MOBIL Accounts Payable Check 122.23
88120 1/24/2003 FAILSAFE TESTING Accounts Payable Check 599.25
88121 1/24/2003 FARM SUPPLY COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 551.53
88122 1/24/2003 FBI/LEEDA Accounts Payable Check 35.00
88123 1/24/2003 FERRELL'S AUTO REPAIR Accounts Payable Check 78.00
88124 1/24/2003 FGL ENVIRONMENTAL Accounts Payable Check 453.40
88125 1/24/2003 FIRE OUT UNIFORM COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 89.11
88126 1/24/2003 FIRSTLINE,LLC Accounts Payable Check 117.98
88127 1/24/2003 FOOD FOR LESS Accounts Payable Check 731.12
88128 1/24/2003 GAS COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 1,294.39
88129 1/24/2003 GEM AUTO PARTS Accounts Payable Check 356.24
88130 1/24/2003 MATTHEW A.GIANAS Accounts Payable Check 139.00
88131 1/24/2003 GLADWELL GOVERNMENT SVCS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 5,395.37
88132 1/24/2003 GRISANTI HARDWARE Accounts Payable Check 45.29
88133 1/24/2003 H.D.PETERSON Accounts Payable Check 3,800.71
88134 1/24/2003 HART IMPRESSIONS PRINT© Accounts Payable Check 1286
88135 1/24/2003 JILL H.HARVEY Accounts Payable Check 4,570.
88136 1/24/2003 REGIONALD HICKS Accounts Payable Check 100.00
88138 1/24/2003 HOME DEPOT Accounts Payable Check 4,210.77
88139 1/24/2003 INDUSTRIAL MEDICAL CENTER OF Accounts Payable Check 325.00
88140 1/24/2003 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Accounts Payable Check 191.78
88141 1/24/2003 INGLIS PET HOTEL Accounts Payable Check 23.60
88142 1/24/2003 J&S SWEEPING SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 1,235.00
88143 1/24/2003 TOM JAMASON Accounts Payable Check 40.00
88144 1/24/2003 JOHN JANSONS Accounts Payable Check 140.00
88145 1/24/2003 JESPERSEN'S TIRE SERVICE,INC. Accounts Payable Check 72.13
88146 1/24/2003 JIFFY LUBE#1932 PCJL,INC. Accounts Payable Check 113.24
88147 1/24/2003 K-MART Accounts Payable Check 74.55
88148 1/24/2003 KPRL 1230 AM Accounts Payable Check 32.00
88149 1/24/2003 KRITZ EXCAVATING&TRUCKING Accounts Payable Check 1,526.00
88150 1/24/2003 LIFE ASSIST,INC. Accounts Payable Check 110.68
88151 1/24/2003 LYNDON'S AUTOMOTIVE Accounts Payable Check 238.00
88152 1/24/2003 MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK,INC. Accounts Payable Check 176.58
88153 1/24/2003 ANNETTE MANIER Accounts Payable Check 126•
b30
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of January 2003
Check Check
Aftimber Date Vendor Description Amount
88154 1/24/2003 WADE MCKINNEY Accounts Payable Check 242.16
88155 1/24/2003 MCNAMARA ELECTRIC Accounts Payable Check 11.29
88156 1/24/2003 CORY MEYER Accounts Payable Check 40.00
88157 1/24/2003 MID-COAST MOWER&SAW Accounts Payable Check 32.25
88158 1/24/2003 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE Accounts Payable Check 323.29
88159 1/24/2003 MISSION OFFICE PRODUCTS Accounts Payable Check 67.57
88160 1/24/2003 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 60.00
88161 1/24/2003 MOORE'S WESTERN NURSERY Accounts Payable Check 71.64
88162 1/24/2003 JACOB H.MURCH Accounts Payable Check 140.00
88163 1/24/2003 MUSIC FACTORY Accounts Payable Check 37.54
88164 1/24/2003 NATIONAL TACTICAL OFFICERS ASC Accounts Payable Check 150.00
88165 1/24/2003 NEW HORIZONS Accounts Payable Check 3,000.00
88166 1/24/2003 NEWCO DISTRIBUTORS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 864.53
88167 1/24/2003 NORTH COUNTY GLASS Accounts Payable Check 160.46
88168 1/24/2003 NORTH NET FIRE TRAINING CENTER Accounts Payable Check 250.00
88169 1/24/2003 OFFICE PAVILION Accounts Payable Check 226.57
88170 1/24/2003 OFFICEMAX CREDIT PLAN Accounts Payable Check 398.68
• 88171 1/24/2003 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE Accounts Payable Check 157.73
88172 1/24/2003 PACIFIC BELL Accounts Payable Check 1,299.30
88179 1/24/2003 PACIFIC BELL/WORLDCOM Accounts Payable Check 3,232.07
88180 1/24/2003 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC Accounts Payable Check 227.77
88181 1/24/2003 PAPER WORKS Accounts Payable Check 1,085.14
88182 1/24/2003 DAVE PAYTON Accounts Payable Check 800.02
88183 1/24/2003 PENNY MEN Accounts Payable Check 46.20
88184 1/24/2003 PERRY'S PARCEL SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 76.45
88185 1/24/2003 FRED PFLUM Accounts Payable Check 80.00
88186 1/24/2003 PFLUM'S ATASCADERO MUFFLER Accounts Payable Check 20.00
88187 1/24/2003 PLATINUM PLUS FOR BUSINESS 1280 Accounts Payable Check 305.74
88188 1/24/2003 PLATINUM PLUS FOR BUSINESS 1298 Accounts Payable Check 2,418.98
88189 1/24/2003 PLATINUM PLUS FOR BUSINESS1306 Accounts Payable Check 1,050.60
88190 1/24/2003 PLATINUM PLUS FOR BUSINESS 1314 Accounts Payable Check 37.01
88191 1/24/2003 PLATINUM PLUS FOR BUSINESS 1322 Accounts Payable Check 145.22
88192 1/24/2003 PLATINUM PLUS FOR BUSINESS 1363 Accounts Payable Check 122.23
88193 1/24/2003 PLATINUM PLUS FOR BUSINESS 1389 . Accounts Payable Check 1,089.00
• 88194 1/24/2003 POOR RICHARD'S PRESS Accounts Payable Check 1,027.14
88195 1/24/2003 PRO MOTION Accounts Payable Check 3,526.09
X311
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of January 2003
Check Check
Number Date Vendor Description Amours
88196 1/24/2003 PUBLIC SAFETY CENTER,INC. Accounts Payable Check 178.
88197 1/24/2003 GRACE L.PUCCI Accounts Payable Check 450.00
88198 1/24/2003 QUILL CORPORATION Accounts Payable Check 459.18
88199 1/24/2003 RADDISON HOTEL Accounts Payable Check 92.40
88200 1/24/2003 RADIO SHACK Accounts Payable Check 64.34
88201 1/24/2003 RAINBOW MEALWORMS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 209.72
88202 1/24/2003 RAY'S AUTO DETAIL Accounts Payable Check 275.00
88203 1/24/2003 RECOGNITION WORKS Accounts Payable Check 128.27
88204 1/24/2003 REID ROOFING Accounts Payable Check 1,071.71
88205 1/24/2003 REVENUE&COST SPECIALISTS LLC Accounts Payable Check 8,400.00
88206 1/24/2003 RICK BUTLER BUSINESS MACHINES Accounts Payable Check 120.00
88207 1/24/2003 ROHRER HAY&FEED SALES Accounts Payable Check 95.00
88208 1/24/2003 STEVE ROMO Accounts Payable Check 68.00
88209 1/24/2003 SAFETY-KLEEN INC. Accounts Payable Check 109.25
88210 1/24/2003 SAN JOAQUIN SUPPLY COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 387.28
88211 1/24/2003 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY FIRE Accounts Payable Check 80.00
88212 1/24/2003 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY SHERIFF Accounts Payable Check 10,082.
Accounts Payable Check 3
88213 1/24/2003 SAN LUIS SURGICAL SUPPLY
88214 1/24/2003 STEVE SANDEFFER Accounts Payable Check 40.00
88215 1/24/2003 SANTA MARIA TIRE,INC. Accounts Payable Check 971.61
88216 1/24/2003 SCOTT O'BRIEN FIRE&SAFETY CO Accounts Payable Check 171.63
88217 1/24/2003 SHELL OIL COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 20.00
88218 1/24/2003 SIGN OUTLET Accounts Payable Check 617.65
88219 1/24/2003 KANDY SIROONIAN Accounts Payable Check 40.00
88220 1/24/2003 SLO COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT Accounts Payable Check 30.00
88221 1/24/2003 SLORTA Accounts Payable Check 3,000.00
88222 1/24/2003 SMART AND FINAL Accounts Payable Check 58.38
88223 1/24/2003 DAVID L.SMAW Accounts Payable Check 30.00
88224 1/24/2003 SO CA TRAINING OFFICERS ASSC Accounts Payable Check 80.00
88225 1/24/2003 SPECIALTY CONSTRUCTION,INC. Accounts Payable Check 111 123.68
88226 1/24/2003 STERLING COMMUNICATIONS Accounts Payable Check 131.09
88227 1/24/2003 KURT W.STONE Accounts Payable Check 130.00
88228 1/24/2003 ROY STRONG Accounts Payable Check 120.00
88229 1/24/2003 SUNLIGHT JANITORIAL Accounts Payable Check 1,170.00
88230 1/24/2003 SUPERIOR QUALITY COPIERS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 59
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of January 2003
Check Check
tuber Date Vendor Description Amount
88231 1/24/2003 SYLVESTER'S SECURITY ALARMS Accounts Payable Check 207.50
88232 1/24/2003 TEMPLETON UNIFORMS Accounts Payable Check 184.26
88233 1/24/2003 TENNANT Accounts Payable Check 163.02
88234 1/24/2003 TERRY&PAULSON ENTERPRISE INC Accounts Payable Check 75.08
88235 1/24/2003 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR Accounts Payable Check 216.36
88236 1/24/2003 TRIBUNE Accounts Payable Check 156.00
88237 1/24/2003 TRIBUNE Accounts Payable Check 576.22
88238 1/24/2003 TURF STAR,INC. Accounts Payable Check 1,093.31
88239 1/24/2003 UNION ASPHALT,INC. Accounts Payable Check 421.69
88240 1/24/2003 UNOCAL Accounts Payable Check 2,323.35
88241 1/24/2003 TOM VELASQUEZ Accounts Payable Check 68.00
88242 1/24/2003 VERIZON WIRELESS Accounts Payable Check 234.83
88243 1/24/2003 MATT VIERRA Accounts Payable Check 191.05
88244 1/24/2003 VONS Accounts Payable Check 61.96
88245 1/24/2003 W.W.GRAINGER,INC. Accounts Payable Check 134.62
88246 1/24/2003 WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION Accounts Payable Check 134.00
88247 1/24/2003 WESTERN JANITOR SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 67.12
88248 1/24/2003 WILLIAM P.WHITE Accounts Payable Check 260.00
88249 1/24/2003 ZOO MED LABORATORIES,INC. Accounts Payable Check 125.91
88250 1/24/2003 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES,INC. Accounts Payable Check 114.48
88251 1/31/2003 COUNTY-CITY EMPLOYEES CU Payroll Vendor Payment 625.00
88252 1/31/2003 EMPLOYMENT DEV DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 6,889.64
88253 1/31/2003 EMPLOYMENT DEV.DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 738.64
88254 1/31/2003 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Payroll Vendor Payment 46.98
88255 1/31/2003 FAMILY SUPPORT DIVISION Accounts Payable Check 21.01
88256 1/31/2003 FAMILY SUPPORT DIVISION Payroll Vendor Payment 369.23
88257 1/31/2003 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE Payroll Vendor Payment 5,719.14
88258 1/31/2003 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 Payroll Vendor Payment 400.00
88259 1/31/2003 PERS LONG TERM CARE PROGRAM Payroll Vendor Payment 32.31
88260 1/31/2003 PUBLIC EMPL RETIREMENT SYSTEM Payroll Vendor Payment 19,225.13
88261 1/31/2003 SEIU LOCAL 620 AFL-CIO Payroll Vendor Payment 556.47
88262 1/31/2003 MARCIA TORGERSON Accounts Payable Check 1.67
88263 1/31/2003 WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK Payroll Vendor Payment 862.72
• $ 881,554.00
Lt
ITEM NUMBER: A-3,
DATE: 02/25/2003
1919 ■ 1979
Atascadero City Council
Staff Report - City Manager's Office
Request for Designation of the
Integrated Waste Management Authority as
Atascadero's Local Enforcement Agency
RECOMMENDATION:
Council adopt draft Resolution, withdrawing the designation of the San Luis Obispo County
Health Department, Division of Environmental Health, as Atascadero's Local Enforcement
Agency, and 'approving the designation of the San Luis Obispo County Integrated Waste
Management Authority as Atascadero's Local Enforcement Agency.
•
DISCUSSION:
The enactment of the California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 and the resulting
regulations promulgated in the California Code of Regulations (CCR), Titles 14 and 27,
mandated numerous changes in solid waste enforcement. Among those changes affecting local
government is a requirement that local governing bodies formally designate a Local Enforcement
Agency (LEA). The LEA performs permitting, inspection and enforcement duties for
permitted, closed, abandoned and illegal solid waste facilities, such as landfills, compost
facilities and transfer stations.
Public Resources Code Section 43203 provides four LEA designation options:
1. A County-wide LEA approved by the County Board of Supervisors and by a majority of
the cities representing a majority of the incorporated population.
2. The County and Cites may enter into a joint exercise of powers agreement to establish an
LEA.
3. The City Council may designate an LEA.
• an LEA for the unincorporated area of th
4. The County may designate rp e County.
G- 4
ITEM NUMBER: A-3
DATE: 02/25/2003
In 1992, the County of San Luis Obispo, Environmental Health Division was designated as the •
County-wide LEA by the County Board of Supervisors and by a majority of the cities
representing a majority of the incorporated population. Subsequent to this action, the City of
Paso Robles withdrew its designation and is currently relying on the California Integrated Waste
Management Board as the enforcement agency.
At the September 11, 2002 IWMA Board Meeting, staff was directed to develop a list of options
for managing the LEA program. At the November 13, 2002 IWMA Board Meeting the options
were presented and the IWMA Board directed staff to develop an action plan for the IWMA to
become the LEA. On January 8, 2003, the IWMA Board adopted the action plan and directed
staff to prepare the documents required to switch the LEA from County of San Luis Obispo,
Environmental Health Division to the IWMA.
As part of the application package, each city must withdraw its designation of the County of San
Luis Obispo, Environmental Health Division as its LEA and then designate the IWMA as the
LEA. Adopting the attached Resolution fulfills this requirement. Note that the City of Paso
Robles intends to continue to rely on the California Integrated Waste Management Board as the
enforcement agency for the City of Paso Robles.
There are 6 active solid waste facilities in the County that are currently inspected and permitted
by County of San Luis Obispo, Environmental Health Division Environmental Health. All 6
facilities are located in the unincorporated area of the County. Inspection and permitting of
these facilities would become the responsibility of the IWMA. In addition there are about 25 •
inactive or non-permitted facilities that will also be inspected by the IWMA.
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
ATTACHMENT: Draft Resolution
635
ITEM NUMBER: A-3,
DATE: 02/25/2003
DRAFT RESOLUTION
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ATASCADERO APPROVING THE DESIGNATION OF THE SAN LUIS
OBISPO COUNTY INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT
AUTHORITY, ENFORCEMENT SECTION, AS ENFORCEMENT
AGENCY FOR THE CITY OF ATASCADERO
WHEREAS, the City of Atascadero is required by sections 43202-03 of the Public
Resources Code to designate an enforcement agency to carry out the provisions of the California
Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989; and
WHEREAS, the City of Atascadero has previously designated the San Luis Obispo
County Health Department, Division of Environmental Health to be the enforcement agency and
now in accordance with Title 14, California Code of Regulations, Section 18056 wishes to
withdraw that designation; and
WHEREAS, the City of Atascadero in accordance with Title 14, California Code of
Regulations, Section 18051 wishes to designate the San Luis Obispo County Integrated Waste
Management Authority Enforcement Section as the enforcement agency;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of
Atascadero, that it hereby withdraws the designation of the San Luis Obispo County Health
Department, Division of Environmental Health as the enforcement agency and designates the San
• Luis Obispo County Integrated Waste Management Authority, Enforcement Section as the
enforcement agency. This action is conditioned on the California Integrated Waste Management
Board certification of the San Luis Obispo County Integrated Waste Management Authority,
Enforcement Section.
On motion by Council Member , seconded by Council Member , and on the following
roll call vote,to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
By:
Jerry L. Clay, Sr., Mayor
Attest:
Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk
Approved as to form:
is
Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney
ITEM NUMBER: A-4
' DATE: 02/25/2003
K
is e
Atascadero City Council
Staff Report Community Development Department
Zone Change 2002-0031
9105 & 9127 San Diego Road
(Mehring / Twin Cities Surveys)
RECOMMENDATION:
City Council introduce for second reading by title only, and adopt the draft Ordinance, enacting
Zone Change 2002-0031; and amend the City's Zoning Map to add a PD-16 overlay district to
the project area.
DISCUSSION:
On February 11, 2003, the City Council conducted a public hearing to consider amendment of
the Official Zoning Map of the City of Atascadero from RS (Residential Suburban) to RS / PD
16 (Residential Suburban with a PD-16 overlay district) concurrently with a corresponding
Master Plan of Development, and Tentative Tract Map. The zone change will allow a single-
family residential unit to be constructed on each vacant separate lot and allow the existing single-
family residences to remain. There were no changes made by the City Council to the Ordinance
during its first reading and it is ready for final adoption as attached.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The project would likely have a slight negative impact on City revenues. As a general rule,
single-family dwellings require services that exceed the revenue generated by the dwelling.
ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1: Location Map
Attachment 2: Draft Ordinance
1137
P. y�►
..ilii.
■u■uuu l:
■ououu.► ^. t
u.uuueuee.., _ ,.. »�,,•,. a
vuuuuuuu■
The Residential Suburban Zone
surrounds the Project
•uu.uuuuu►
•aauouuuu.■, Project dry
■u■uuu■■.- G � a
HE
son
uuuu■ +.
vu.o..0
1 i ■uu.■u �� y
� 4
S � rrewrexmwrawie.w
i
ITEM NUMBER: A-4
DATE: 02/25/2003
• Attachment 1: Draft Ordinance
ZCH 2002-0031
DRAFT ORDINANCE
AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO
AUTHORIZING ZONE CHANGE 2002-0031 THEREBY AMENDING THE ZONING
MAP DISTRICT OF APN 045-441-035 & 045-441-004 FROM RS (RESIDENTIAL
SUBURBAN) TO RS/PD-16 (RESIDENTIAL SUBURBAN WITH A PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT-16 OVERLAY DISTRICT) SUBJECT TO A MASTER PLAN OF
DEVELOPMENT.
9105 & 9127 San Diego Road/APN 045-441-035 & 045-441-004 /William Mehring)
WHEREAS, an application has been received from William Mehring, 11190 Santa
Lucia Road, Atascadero, CA 93422, (Applicant & Property Owner), to consider a project
consisting of a zone change from RS (Residential Suburban) to RS / PD-16 (Residential
Suburban with a planned development-16 Overlay District) with the adoption of a Master Plan of
Development, a five-lot residential tentative tract map on APN 045-441-035 & 004; and,
WHEREAS, an Initial Study and Draft Negative Declaration 2002-0046 were prepared
for the project and made available for public review in accordance with the requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA); and,
WHEREAS,the site's General Plan Designation is RE (Residential Estates); and,
WHEREAS,the site's current zoning district is RS (Residential Suburban); and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to
enact this amendment to the Zoning Map to protect the health, safety and welfare of its citizens
by applying orderly development of the City; and,
WHEREAS, the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and public notice of
environmental documents, as set forth in the State and local guidelines for implementation of the
California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)have been adhered to; and,
WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed Public Hearing upon the subject Zone
Change application was held by the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero at which
hearing evidence, oral and documentary, was admitted on behalf of said Zoning amendments;
and,
WHEREAS, the Atascadero City Council; at a duly noticed Public Hearing held on
Tuesday, February 11, 2003, considered Zone Change 2002-0031, after first studying and
considering the Proposed Negative Declaration prepared for the project, and
1 - 39
ITEM NUMBER: A-4
DATE: 02/25/2003
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Atascadero, held a second reading of the •
draft Ordinance on February 25, 2003;
NOW, THEREFORE,the City Council does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. Findings for Approval of a Zone Change Creating a PD-16 Planned
Development Overlay District. The City Council finds as follows:
a) Modification of development standards or processing requirements is warranted to promote
orderly and harmonious development.
b) Modification of development standards or processing requirements will enhance the
opportunity to best utilize special characteristics of an area and will have a beneficial effect
on the area.
c) Benefits derived from the overlay zone cannot be reasonably achieved through existing
development standards or processing requirements.
d) Proposed plans offer certain redeeming features to compensate for the requested
modification.
SECTION 2. Approval. The Council of the City of Atascadero, in a regular session •
assembled on Tuesday, February 25, 2003 resolved to introduce for second reading an ordinance
that would rezone the subject site consistent with the following:
a) Exhibit A: Zone Change Map
SECTION 3. Effective Date.
This ordinance shall be effective at 12:01 a.m. on the 31St day after its final
passage.
640
ITEM NUMBER: A-4
DATE: 02/25/2003
• On motion by Council Member and seconded by Council Member
the foregoing Ordinance is hereby adopted following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ADOPTED:
By:
Jerry L. Clay, Sr., Mayor
Attest:
•
Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk
Approved as to form:
Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney
641
E
......■..■.■tt..
1.......■■■■....■
RS/PDt.. 16
■.........ttt' �>
■.■/tt....■■■' i
mmii
u■■u..■ ! s
vouu.. r
•tuouu
vu..■u..
�,a 'uuuu■ t �,�
'� ■tt...... '{711 ��%,ice �
s iiiiiiii.
?i
t
r
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 02/25/2003
■ r,■ ■ ®,
• 1918 1979
\ cm
Atascadero City Council
Staff Report - City Manager's Office
Development Impact Fee Adjustments
RECOMMENDATION:
Council accept public comment and provide direction to staff to return the item for the next
Council agenda with an implementing ordinance for consideration of adoption.
DISCUSSION:
Approximately one year ago, the City of Atascadero retained the services of Revenue and Cost
• Specialists (RCS), LLC, to perform a Development Impact Fee Study (Attachment #1), and a
Master Facilities Plan (Attachment #2), a comprehensive assessment of the capital projects and
capital acquisitions necessary to maintain a continued level of public services to accommodate
future growth. As the City of Atascadero is responsible for providing services to a continually
expanding residential and business community, development impact fees are required to preserve
existing services and fund new capital projects to mitigate growth. There are legal and
procedural regulations for the charging of the impact fees. The original legislation, AB 1600, is
now codified as California Government Code (66000 et. seq.). Impact fees must be calculated
based upon a realistic relationship between the use of the fee and the type of development paying
the fee. California law does not allow the collection of development impact fees for current
capital deficiencies, but rather to meet the service needs of new growth and a higher population.
A periodic review of the City's Development Impact Fees is completed to ensure that the City
collects sufficient funds to construct the additional infrastructure needed to serve new residents
and business development in Atascadero. The impact fees are calculated and based upon a
complete list of public infrastructure projects to be financed by the fees, and are identified in the
City's Master Facilities Plan. The report includes a proportional analysis of the infrastructure
needs required to support new development of the City relative to the existing infrastructure.
City records indicate that the City of Atascadero first adopted such fees in 1986. The City last
revised its development impact fees in 1991. A survey of other agency impact fees in the County
is attached to this report (Attachment#3).
X4-13
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 02/25/2003
The Master Facilities Plan provides for three major types of projects. One group provides for the
maintenance, repair and rehabilitation of the City's varied infrastructure, including its streets, •
storm drains and other pubic facilities. The second group of projects is needed to serve future
development and include such projects as the widening of streets, creation of additional parkland
or the construction of a new fire station. The last group of projects in the Master Facilities Plan
enhances the quality of life for all residents and spurs economic growth in the community. These
projects include the library expansion and/or a new recreation center.
There are nine different types of capital improvements, which are quantified, and subject to the
development impact fees. The types of improvements are:
INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT TOTALS
+ Law Enforcement Facilities and Equipment $2,299,742
+ Fire Facilities $6,377,583
+ Parks, Open Space Land acquisition and Development $19,684,752
+Circulation System $97,440,000
+ Storm Drainage Facilities $7,300,000
+ General Facilities (City Hall, etc.) $5,672,445
+ Public Use Center $3,870,705
+ Sewer Collection System UNKN
+ Library Facility $1,900,604
PROJECT TOTALS $144,545,831
As indicated above,Atascadero's total project expenditures identified as necessary through build-
out are $144,545,831. Not all of the City's needed projects qualify for impact fee funding.
Indeed, even if the maximum supportable impact fees for all infrastructures were to be adopted,
they would generate enough revenues (about 47%) to complete only some of the identified
proj ects.
There are very few other sources available to the City to fund the projects identified and needed
in the Master Facilities Plan. As much as 25 % of the total project infrastructure is not funded,
even if the development impact fees were fully adopted.
The proposed impact fees are the result of many hours of work by every City department and the
consultant. The City now has a long-range program of identification of the entire infrastructure •
r
6414
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 02/25/2003
• and facility needs necessary to meet service demands of growth through build-out. The
information included in the Master Facilities Plan is based upon the Atascadero Comprehensive
General Plan and other official planning documents.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Actual revenues are not estimated; they will offset expenses associated with providing services to
new development.
ALTERNATIVES:
Amend, modify or reject the proposed development impact fee adjustments.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment#1-Development Impact Fee Study Report
Attachment#2- Master Facilities Plan
Attachment#3- Regional Dev. Impact Fee Survey
•
•
�45
M
O N cq N Mr N N kO m N �+
l0 N (n m l0 c) l0 O u) r C N N
m
ro ro C M r-1 ri O -4 m U) U) N M .G
10 � N r-I N I-I lD m U•
ro
41
41
z z
4
�o .-1 U7 N [t' ID Q' m O to
N
U) ,-1 rl r r r M Ol U) U7 M c-I
•.i O O r N C' N m c to
a O ul
.�
F7 m N M l0 M M of LO N
roo
m a
V). va yr a> yr t9
m In O U) O of rn LO Ln ko r o) M ri M r
m V' -i Ul m r r r N r ID N U) M m r
o..' M N %D m V' M r r Ln U') d' V' Ql w
Nro ri r-i C' N U) of
-'1 N
a a�
yr yr ut ar
Cl
(3) ko r M 1-1 of 1-1 (11 �O
m m r �-I m 1 N r M �--I
O a) N
m-1 •-i N V' N N dl N N
(q.n wQ)o, O 1) m N
x +1 -.1 sa W
-H 4 v
yr yr yr v>• yr r N -H G N
J
ar a sl (0 ro a)
In to m m r w U') M Pa �-{ W 0 2:
N N Cl U) U1 M of U) -4 ro O
m O '-'1 .--I m 0 N 10 m of ro U tT U U
41 p 0 >4 (U Cl) M r N N of •H .'1 a
f..' ) y4
r \ E 0 4 8 ::S U
V U) a) U W a)
V '-I a) ri a) ri
O a) ••i yr ur yr I0. v> W $ W
as
Ha) ri O m m o) N to -4 Ln µ' .--1 r a' Q,' d' N N m M In O
roof M Cl) Cl r N r-
w If)\�O n\ \M ri m 1 d' M
N U •ri loU ri m .--1 V to N l0 z -1 r-1 z z N m 14 1-4 M .--1
:w m 41 y O
N Ll r-I N r
m O > O •
ro 0 r7
m 'U yr yr ar yr yr
:k N FI 4-1
r. 4j �' r N O r to N of O m of In
-H O •'i V SI m N N t?to O W C In to M
ro 9 ro al a) U r N N N U) m
J-1 W O yr vt vt
O
4) C) W
4) ri (:`
�O (h N V}
a •,I n
U) N X
V)' O r -i C O M m M
O\ N Ln a) of M r r r U) N G O
a a) a) M M M N 1 N N m N
rC N
1-1 O ro r-i ri M w m m
ro
ma)ro ro
A aro) t
3
O a -H Q, yr v>• v> tR N N
I m m al
a) W
> 4J U
Q) W rl at N U) r O m m Cl) of Ul M O
'O M r I-1 r-i M O O o1 m 0l r r r1 W
O N m N M t?C' O O m W
a) m > O vT .V .VT Vf ro
11 O C: N N N I--I l0 m N
U O 1.1 ro N vT N N H
roo
. rl N
q
d
W ) W
m C� •yi O� � y
WW�7
W oi z Id H a b
r -Ui .oi F [si m
N
C ,U4 W U bI p O m .UQ �i a 0
�
+1 a) U 4 •.l1 Q. P. -H a) m
a) a) O U 'O m +J A )'•1 U
U W w ll W a .0ro 1) J-1 .-I 11 ►] F W
O a) m U •-I SI a) a) -.i U F •w
X Gi J-1 a) m H W 1-1 m a) U m F F H
Pl U .i a) a) \-- )-I ro a) 0
Li ro
m N b+' W 'U F y a) V) V W 'O E-1 '-i
0 El 40L)O C tr U m U
•.i GI b W bl YI F. 4) 1-1 m C W •'I m 11 a) m
L_1 a 14 •0 W al .4 O Q) +1 W H rtl A ld A .0 q ^
O ri W C.' 0 4) ) ro ro u N o 0 4 u a)
W O N W 3 w q H a a W O � r �
m m
a
ITEM NUMBER: B-2
DATE: 02/25/2003
-■ r� a �� I
1918 ■ 1 9
Atascadero City Council
Staff Report- Community Development Department
Residential Second Unit Code Text Amendment
Zone Change 2003-0039
RECOMMENDATION:
Planning Commission recommends:
The City Council introduce for first reading, by title only, draft Ordinance A amending the
Zoning Ordinance to allow second units in the RSF-Y Zoning district subject to performance
standards.
• REPORT-IN-BRIEF:
The proposed project consists of zone code text change. The proposed zone change (ZCH
2003-0039) would amend the existing ordinance to allow second residential dwelling units in the
RSF-Y (residential single family 1-acre minimum) zoning district subject to performance
standards and consistent with General Plan Program HOS 3.1.2.
Planning Commission Summary:
The Planning Commission held a hearing on February 4, 2003 to consider the proposed zoning
code text change. The Planning Commission is recommending approval of the zone change with
the added provisions that the covered parking space be enclosed and that engineered septic
systems be allowed for second units where sewer is not available. The Commission also
discussed increasing the maximum unit size to 950 square feet and requiring the unit to be deed
restricted for rent to persons of either very low or low income. The unit size could not be
changed due to the General Plan policy restriction of 800 square feet. The Planning Commission
passed a separate motion recommending the City Council initiate a General Plan Amendment to
change the minimum unit size to 950 square feet (see attachment 4). The Commission decided
not to take action on the issue of requiring an affordability deed restriction on second units.
(Planning Commission minutes are attached as Attachment 2)
G-4
ITEM NUMBER: B-2
DATE: 02/25/2003
Situation and facts:
1. Applicant: Cit of Atascadero •
pp Y
2. Project Address: City wide in the RSF-Y zoning district
3. General Plan Designation: Single Family Residential (SFR-Y- 1 acre
minimum)
4. Zoning District: Residential Single Family(RSF-Y— 1 acre
minimum), Limited Single Family(LSF-Y 1-acre
minimum)
5. Environmental Status: The proposed project has been analyzed adequately
in the 2002 General Plan EIR pursuant to applicable
standards and impacts have been avoided or
mitigated pursuant to the that EIR.
DISCUSSION:
Background: The State of California has identified secondary residential dwelling units as an
important means of providing affordable housing. During the City's General Plan Update •
process the issue of secondary units was debated numerous times as part of the City's affordable
housing strategy and Housing Element. The final General Plan included Housing Element
Program 3.1.2. which calls for the adoption of an ordinance to conditionally allow second units
in the SFR-Y land use designation subject to performance standards. The purpose of the
performance standards is to limit the second units to lots of 1-acre or larger and ensure
neighborhood compatibility.
Goal HOS 3: Ensure that an adequate amount of rental housing
exists.
Policy 3.1: Ensure that the supply of low and moderate rental housing is not significantly
reduced.
Programs:
2. Adopt an ordinance that would conditionally allow second units in the SFR-Y land
use designation subject to performance standards including:
a. Lots shall be a minimum of 1-acre net.
b. Units to be subject to a maximum square footage of 800 square feet.
C. One covered parking space shall be provided.
d. The unit shall maintain the same setback requirements as the primary •
'4
ITEM NUMBER: B-2
DATE: 02/25/2003
• residence.
e. The unit shall be architectural compatible with the primary residence.
f. Grading and native tree impacts shall be minimal.
g. The unit shall be compatible with the surrounding neighborhood
h. A conditional use permit approval shall be required
i. Guesthouses shall be prohibited in the SFR-Y land use.
Responsible Agency: CDD, Planning Commission, City Council
Timeframe: 2003-2004
Quantified Objective: 3 very low income units per year
Analysis: Two sections of the zoning ordinance need to be amended to allow second units.
Section 9-3.153 establishes conditional uses in the RSF zoning district. Residential second units
will be added as conditionally allowed use. The second unit performance standards are added
under Residential Accessory Uses section 9-6.106. The code section allowing guesthouses
would be deleted from section 9-6.106 consistent with General Plan Program LOC 2.1.7. The
proposed amendments are shown in strikethrough and underline format as follows.
9-3.153 Conditional uses (Residential Single Family).
The following uses may be allowed in the Residential Single Family Zone. The establishment of
conditional uses shall be as provided by Section 9-2.109:
(a) Churches and related activities (see Section 9-6.121);
(b) Schools (see Section 9-6.125);
(c) Mobilehome developments (see Section 9-6.143);
• (d) Skilled nursing facility, where the number of residents under care is greater than six (see
Section 9-6.134);
(e) Residential care, where the number of residents under care is greater than six(see Section 9-
6.135);
(f) Organizational houses;
(g) Pipeline;
(h) Bed and breakfast;
(i) Caretaker residence (see Section 9-6.104);
Q)The following uses where established in a residential structure of historical importance are
satisfied:
(1) Broadcasting studios,
(2) Business support services,
(3) Libraries and museums,
(4) Offices,
(5) Personal services,
(6) School-business and vocational;
(k) Kennels (see Section 9-6.111). (Ord. 68 § 9-3.153, 1983)
Residential Second Units (RSF-Y only) (see Section 9.6106)
9-6.106 Residential accessory uses.
(b) Residential Second Units.A residential second unit may be established as an
accessory use to a residence in the RSF-Y or LSF-Y zoning district as follows:
(1) Lot Size: The net lot area shall be 1-acre minimum.
(2) Sewer: The second unit shall be connected to City sewer where available.
Secondary engineered septic systems may be approved by the City
• Engineer.
(3) Water: The second unit shall be served by a public water supply.
(4) Meters: Separate utilities meters may be installed for second units.
ITEM NUMBER: B-2
DATE: 02/25/2003
(5) Floor area: The maximum residential floor area shall be 800 square feet.
(6) Parking: One enclosed parking space shall be provided.
(7) Setbacks: The same setback requirements of a primary residential dwelling
shall apply to secondary units.
(8) Appearance: The secondary unit shall be architecturally compatible with the
primary residential dwelling.
(9) Grading: Site grading and native tree removals shall be minimized to the
greatest extent possible.
(10) The unit shall be compatible with the surrounding neighborhood.
Conditional Uses: The State of California has recently passed legislation that would prevent
cities from requiring Conditional Use Permits for second units beginning in July 2003.
However, the proposed ordinance requires a Conditional Use Permit process to be consistent
with the language of the General Plan. Conditional Use Permits will thus be required on second
units until the State preemption takes effect. After the preemption, second units will still be
subject to all of the performance standards but will not require a public hearing.
Performance Standards: During the General Plan hearings regarding second units, one of the
primary concerns that was raised was the number and distribution of second units. To address
this issue a series of performance standards were incorporated into the General Plan to limit the
number of second units. The primary limitation is the 1-acre minimum lot area. Although the
minimum lot area of the RSY-F District is 1-acre the majority of the lots are smaller than 1-acre.
Staff estimates that approximately 200 lots exist in the RSF-Y District that are 1-acre and larger.
(Refer to Attachment 1).
Sewer and Utilities: The proposed standards require all second units to be connected to Cit •
Y
sewer where available and public water provided by AMWC. The issue of sewer service was
discussed during the General Plan process but never resolved. Staff is concerned that creating
secondary septic systems on lots with existing septic systems is problematic. The RWQCB
typically requires a minimum 1-acre site for houses with septic systems in addition to provisions
for a 100% leach field expansion area. Given the poor percolation rates throughout Atascadero
that require larger leach fields, adding an additional dwelling with a second leach system and
second 100% expansion area to appropriately zoned 1-acre lots appears to be infeasible. The risk
is that over concentrated septic systems could adversely affect water quality, lead to more system
failures, and impact native trees. For these reasons, staff recommended that second units be
required to connect to City sewer. The Planning Commission is recommending that engineered
septic systems be allowed for second units where sewer is not available.
Secondary gas and electric meters would be permitted but not required for secondary units.
Size and Design: The maximum living area for a second unit would be 800 square feet. A
minimum of one covered parking space, likely in the form of a garage, would be required. The
second unit will be required to be architecturally compatible with the primary unit. While this
does not require the exact same design of both units it does require the units to be of comparable
design quality and materials. Setbacks for secondary units would be the same as primary units
since the use is of an equal intensity.
•
.. v50
ITEM NUMBER: B-2
DATE: 02/25/2003
• FISCAL IMPACT: None.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. The City Council may add to or modify the proposed zone change.
2. The City Council may deny the proposed Zoning Code amendments.
3. The City Council may continue the hearing and refer the project back to staff for further
analysis. Direction should be given to staff on required additional information.
ATTACHMENTS:
1: RSF-Y Land Use Areas Greater than 1 acre
2: Draft Planning Commission Minutes
3: Draft Council Ordinance A
4. Planning Commission Recommendation on General Plan Amendment
UD1
' ���(,�� �11�*��• ,fe+:l+rye��1+j�1►�,�t� 7
f1Uk Rr[i�Rfli ,.
l� �� r�` t,♦ 1',4F
�f`!7 g}+i♦(#J� r +rfir0r. +
t�*tt fl�l`Jy1R4l�1rRti`�•.i♦r.� 110,
t•A�J.�e7`�t`�� #
i t' �♦�w �r �, 1 • i
t•a\► klL
\♦ ♦w4 _`M'hN �asr>�t►.
NI 7240.
�� �rjr, +�"'�♦y11� �rYP f'`a v+Y�i'!!is' ►! i'� fir:
�" • �` �fs'!(►jt~♦dd(+�a,tsOVtr�r..,,_`'" ,' ��n'• s �/(f
t RKE
\��ftl�� fir, .♦�fiE` 1 { 3 �
�� + !`j IVq
K,4J4�•i#.</Ips` t, . edYvt,t t..,.\r
�!► �'i R�1,�s��► AyF •4 ♦waW►,+r(/ I# !`Y ffi�,st� ►
1},E t��♦ ♦ r} j6 • ' *`
t ,�,t: <t
t■°�'��"`�1i�i. sly�M! ��z w•.+;�`wT � t s® l rsss i= ifrli
���l�����`�`�����YI -.t.{fX �s • 4 i ati rpt • R
s: S(, ( srt t'♦' 'F` `'�ry�.'i/ 'r��tt iA+.'t
�f�1�{k4• � ..`:i'
1 f1 �stt�i:{�� „t . • i � .xt v +, to a ♦ #1
+, ■l4' ,� ji �"i►lrjli'� �jart��_�;.y ���e ��rdl� f � }P�•F!- ` + ff�.
`l• ./ -�► AW; ♦t.. r.•. -1+e 1 'lr �♦�c° �,I ��.. '1 `/E!p
!{ ` r of,_e , r rt ►�`���i ,t .Y i►n
FA
ti: , i
f#,!*
R,l1IFF*^f r
� s �..,,��1�•s Nt � 4rt,�il,>'ri_w
iry
PAP M,
t ♦ f t�.. f 4F t
�+► i+I/� "* i`� 4-4 LIVE
�1�i1#W�f w
rti��«'� T�� E F sri i,�ls �r 1 S�#�
I � /'VA JP" P� II►* 0f}l �a�0. it ,_t. 't r �\♦fit iti �
Wa. � � �� ��j�I f``r, ,�f♦s'_ ( �•, i1(.�;..., iy s•cE,t�.*«fd,/�.*','�{'�t. +,
t t►1 ES•* r- .//���i�� t!��- EIN
�a �**.N�y! t���♦ r*ta' l
_* fir."� * s .�` r..'.t, R1 �t *'� ► x #r' t,
Rte 1 � �� ♦ 1��������'� .*-�«�� �' �� #,
w_1�.1L1�• ��t�,� tsa.._ _'�. E� ..����►i,/� � ♦►�°air ��l���4Ya1a1w`
• Attachment 2: Draft Planning Commission Minutes
Draft
CITY OF ATASCADER
CFx'ffi IM
4 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
Regular Meeting
February 4, 2003— 7:00 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER
Chairperson Bentz called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. and Commissioner Jones led the
Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL
• Present: Commissioners Jones, Kelley, Porter, Fonzi and Chairperson Bentz
Absent: Commissioner Eddings
Staff: Community Development Director Warren Frace, Planning Services Manager
Steve McHarris, Assistant Planner Kelly Davis and Recording Secretary
Grace Pucci.
PLANNING COMMISSION BUSINESS
1. ELECTION OF NEW CHAIR AND VICE-CHAIR
NOMINATION: By Commissioner Kelley and seconded by Chairperson Bentz of Vice
Chairperson Fonzi to the position of Planning Commission
Chairperson.
Nomination passed 5:0 by a voice vote.
NOMINATION: By Chairperson Fonzi and seconded by Commissioner Jones of
Commissioner Kelley to the position of Planning Commission Vice
Chairperson.
• Nomination passed 5:0 by a voice vote.
UZ3
Draft Ordinance A
February 25,2003
Page 2 of 12
PUBLIC COMMENT i
None
CONSENT CALENDAR
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF THE REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION
MEETING ON JANUARY 21, 2003.
MOTION: By Commissioner Bentz and seconded by Vice Chairperson Kelley to
approve the Consent Calendar.
AYES: Commissioners Bentz, Kelley, Jones, Porter and Chairperson Fonzi
NOES:None
ABSTAIN: None
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote.
PUBLIC HEARINGS •
3. ZONE CHANGE 2003-0039: SECOND UNIT CODE TEXT AMENDMENT
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2002-0081: SECOND UNIT AT 9115 SAN GABRIEL
ROAD:
Applicant: Jerry McDaniel, 9115 San Gabriel Road, Atascadero, CA 93422
Project Title: Zone Change 2003-0039: Zoning Code Text Amendment to allow second
dwelling units in the RSF-Y (Residential Single Family 1-acre minimum)'
zoning district subject to performance standards.
Conditional Use Permit 2002-0081; Application for a second unit at 9115
San Gabriel Road.
Project Location: Zone Change: Citywide: RSF-Y(Residential Single Family 1-acre minimum)
zoning district.
Conditional Use Permit. 9115 San Gabriel Road.
Project A proposed text amendment to the City Zoning Ordinance to allow second
Description: units in the RSF-Y(residential single family 1-acre minimum) zoning
district subject to performance standards and consistent with General Plan
HOS Program 3.1.2. The project also includes an application for one
second unit of 800 square feet located at 9115 San Gabriel Road. The
site area is 1 acre and is served by sewer with minimal slope.
General Plan Designation: SFR-Y(Single Family Residential 1-acre .
minimum)
Zoning District. RSF-Y Residential Single Family 1-acre minimum
Draft Ordinance A
February 25,2003
Page 3 of 12
Proposed The proposed project has been
analyzed adequately in the 2002 General
Environmental Plan EIR pursuant to applicable standards and impacts have been avoided
Determination: or mitigated pursuant to that EIR.
Staff Adoption of Planning Commission Resolution 2003-0095, recommending that
Recommendatio the City Council of the City of Atascadero adopt the proposed amendments
n:
to the Zoning Ordinance.
Adoption of Planning Commission Resolution 2003-0016, to approving
Conditional Use Permit 2002-0081 to establish a residential second unit at
9115 San Gabriel Road in the RSF-Y zone, based on findings, and subject to
conditions or approval and exhibits.
Community Development Director Warren Frace provided the staff report and answered
questions of the Commission.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Jerry McDaniel, 9119 San Gabriel Road, applicant, raised two issues of concern: 1)
Condition of Approval #4 under the CUP, he is requesting removal of the size restriction for
the covered porch while adding verbiage to the effect that the porch would not be enclosed
for any purpose, and 2) Condition of Approval #13 under the CUP, he would request
• removal of the landscaping portion to be replaced with the installation of a six-foot vinyl
fence. Responding to a question by Commissioner Kelley, Mr. McDaniel stated he would
agree to a deed restriction agreement on the back patio.
Jeff Jeeter, 9903 West Front Road, stated that he lives on an adjacent lot and has a clear
view of the proposed project. He feels the applicant has continually improved the property
and he would support his request for a second unit.
Chairperson Fonzi closed the Public Comment period.
Chairperson Fonzi indicated the discussion would be in two parts, first consideration of the
Zoning Ordinance and then the Conditional Use Permit.
Commissioner Jones addressed the sewer issue and was supportive of involving staff in
assisting with an approved design or in the event the system or upgrade did not work, to
deny the second unit or the size of a second unit at that time. He feels the housing is
needed and would support deleting the sewer hookup requirement and try to work within the
septic.
Commissioner Kelley felt it should be a two-part requirement, in that if it were to be septic it
would have to meet the standards set by the City Engineer and if those standards were not
met, then it would have to go to sewer.
There was discussion regarding increasing the allowable size of second units to provide for
• better housing options, especially for families. Commissioner Kelley indicated that he would
like to see the size go to 950 square feet.
J5
Draft Ordinance A
February 25,2003
Page 4 of 12
Director Frace explained to the Commission that the General Plan was very specific •
regarding the 800 square foot size restriction and the only way to approve a change would
be to go through a General Plan Amendment.
Commissioner Kelley suggested presenting the increased square footage issue to the City
Council for further consideration. Additionally, he recommended changing the parking
requirement to a minimum of one enclosed garage with a minimum size of 12' by 20' or a
one-car garage.
Commissioner Bentz indicated that he would like to see an option for either a covered space
or enclosed one-car garage.
There was Commission discussion regarding low-income deed restrictions for second units.
Commissioner Bentz supported the idea of a deed restriction for a specific period of time in
order to insure the units would remain available as low/moderate-income housing.
MOTION: By Vice Chairperson Kelley and seconded by Commissioner Jones to adopt
Planning Commission Resolution 2003-0015, recommending that the City
Council of the City of Atascadero adopt the proposed amendments to the
Zoning Ordinance with the following changes:
■ 9-6.106(b)(2) Sewer: The seGGRd URit shall he nnnneGted to City se�e
Second units shall be connected to sewer where available, secondary
septic systems may be approved by the City Engineer.
■ 9-6.106(b)(6) Parking: One GeYeFed paFkiRg SPaGe Shall be pFeyided One •
enclosed parking space shall be provided for each house.
AYES: Commissioners Kelley, Jones, Porter, Bentz and Chairperson Fonzi
NOES:None
ABSTAIN: None
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote.
MOTION: By Chairperson Fonzi and seconded by Vice Chairperson Kelley to
recommend to the City Council to review and consider the appropriateness of
up to 950 square foot second units based on the types of two bedroom units
seen in other planned development projects.
AYES: Commissioners Kelley, Porter, Jones and Chairperson Fonzi
NOES:Commissioner Bentz
ABSTAIN: None
Motion passed 4:1 by a roll-call vote.
MOTION: Vice Chairperson Kelley and seconded by Commissioner Jones to adopt
Planning Commission Resolution 2003-0016, approving Conditional Use
Draft Ordinance A
February 25,2003
Page 5 of 12
• Permit 2002-0081 to establish a residential second unit at 9115 San Gabriel
Road in the RSF-Y zone, subject to the findings, conditions and exhibits as
attached with the following amendments:
■ Regarding Condition of Approval #8, there is to be a deed restriction that
neither the front nor rear porch be enclosed at any time, and
■ Condition of Approval #13, the landscaping requirement is to be removed
and a permanent fence to be allowed.
AYES: Commissioners Kelley, Jones, Bentz, Porter and Chairperson Fonzi
NOES:None
ABSTAIN: None
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote.
MEETING RECORDED AND MINUTES PREPARED BY:
Grace Pucci, Recording Secretary
•
Ur
Draft Ordinance A
February 25,2003
Page 6 of 12
Attachment 3: Draft Council Ordinance A •
DRAFT ORDINANCE
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO APPROVING
ZONE CHANGE 2003-0039 TO AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE
TO ALLOW RESIDENTIAL SECOND UNITS IN THE RSF-Y ZONING
DISTRICT SUBJECT TO PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
(ZCH 2003-0039: Second Units)
WHEREAS, the City of Atascadero's 2025 General Plan has prioritized the
provision of affordable housing; and,
WHEREAS,the State of California has identified residential second units as an
important means to providing affordable housing in single-family neighborhoods; and,
WHEREAS,the General Plan contains Program HOS 3.1.2. that calls for the •
adoption of an ordinance allowing second units in the RSF-Y zoning district subject to
performance standards; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, at a duly noticed
Public Hearing held on February 4, 2003 considered a recommendation to the City Council,
and,
WHEREAS,the Planning Commission has determined that it is in the best interest of
the City to update the Zoning Ordinance to allow residential second unit to ensure the orderly
provision of affordable housing throughout the community; and,
WHEREAS,the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and public notice of
environmental documents, as set forth in the State and local guidelines for implementation of
the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) have been adhered to; and,
WHEREAS, the Atascadero City Council, at a duly noticed Public Hearing held on
February 25, 2003 considered the project and the Planning Commission's recommendation;
NOW,THEREFORE, the City Council takes the following actions:
•
Draft Ordinance A
February 25,2003
Page 7 of 12
iSECTION 1. FINDINGS OF CONSISTENCY WITH 2002 GENERAL PLAN EIR
1. The proposed project has been analyzed adequately in the 2002 General Plan EIR
pursuant to applicable standards and impacts have been avoided or mitigated
pursuant to the that EIR.
SECTION 2. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF ZONE TEXT CHANGE.
1. The zone change is consistent with General Plan policies and all other applicable
ordinances and policies of the City.
2. Amendment of the zoning ordinance will provide for the orderly development of
affordable housing throughout the community.
3. The zone change will not, in itself, result in significant environmental impacts.
SECTION 3. APPROVAL.
The Atascadero City Council, in a regular session assembled on February 25, 2003 resolved
to introduce for first reading by title only an ordinance that would amend the Zoning
. Ordinance as follows:
9-3.153 Conditional uses.
The following uses may be allowed in the Residential Single Family Zone. The
establishment of conditional uses shall be as provided by Section 9-2.109:
(a) Churches and related activities (see Section 9-6.121);
(b) Schools (see Section 9-6.125);
(c) Mobilehome developments (see Section 9-6.143);
(d) Skilled nursing facility, where the number of residents under care is greater than
six (see Section 9-6.134);
(e) Residential care, where the number of residents under care is greater than six
(see Section 9-6.135);
(f) Organizational houses;
(g) Pipeline;
(h) Bed and breakfast;
(i) Caretaker residence (see Section 9-6.104);
0) The following uses where established in a residential structure of historical
importance are satisfied:
(1) Broadcasting studios,
(2) Business support services,
(3) Libraries and museums,
• (4) Offices,
(5) Personal services,
a>
Draft Ordinance A
February 25,2003
Page 8 of 12
(6) School-business and vocational;
(k) Kennels (see Section 9-6.111). (Ord. 68 § 9-3.153, 1983)
(1) Residential Second Units (RSF-Y only) (see Section 9.6106)
9-3.154 Minimum lot size.
The minimum lot size in the Residential Single Family Zone shall be twenty
the and (20,000)00) sq yarn feet with oowe,' one-half (1/2) acre �"wh-rer-n_•�v�r i�-,v-;Gt
available-and may range up to two and one-half(2Y2) acres. The size of a lot shall be
consistent with the land use designation set forth in the General Plan and shall be
indicated by the symbols set forth in the following chart, which shall be shown on the
official zoning maps as provided by Section 9-3.104(d).
Symbol ,Minimum Lot Size
X One-half(%) acre net area (excluding i
land needed for street rights-of-way
whether publicly or privately owned).
Y !One(1) acre net area (excluding land
.needed for street rights-of-way whether
!publicly or Privately owned),7-whe►p
!sewers are availai�c - •
!One ere&;-when
jBewGFS are not available-
Z One and one-half(1'/2)to two and one-
half(2'/Z) acres based on performance
standards set forth in this section.
(a) Performance Standards. The following performance standards shall be evaluated
for each lot which is appended with the "Z" symbol in determining its minimum lot
size:
(1) Distance from the Center of the Community. Using the Atascadero Administration
Building as the center of the community, the lot size factor based on this
performance standard shall be:
Distance1 v Lot Size Factor
0--4000' 0.08
14000'--6000' 10.10
6000'--8000' 0.12
1. To be measured as radial distance using map maintained in the Planning •
Department.
Draft Ordinance A
February 25,2003
Page 9 of 12
. (2) Septic Suitability. Using generalized soils data from the Soil Conservation
Service Reports, the lot size factor based on this performance standard shall be:
SCS Rating1� ILot Size Factor
Well suited 0.30
jModerate or slow 0.50
Severe 10.70
1. Refer to map maintained in Community Development Department.
Percolation tests may be substituted for the Soil Conservation Service Reports.
These shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer or licensed sanitarian. The
following conversion chart shall be used to determine the appropriate lot size factor:
Percolation Rating Iminutes Per Inch
—.
Well suited ILess than 20
Moderate 20 to 39
Slow 40 to 59
FSevere Greater than 60
(3) Average Slope. Using the Basic, Sectional or Contour Measurement Method, the
lot size factor based on this performance standard shall be:
Slope Lot Size Factor
0 --20% 10.30 —
21 --30% 10.50
0.70 __...�
(4) Condition of Access. Using the road right-of-way with the shortest accessible
distance between a lot and an improved collector road, the lot size factor based on
this performance standard shall be:
Condition Lot Size
Factor
paved with slope of less than 15%or
• City-accepted
paved with slope of greater than 15% 10.20 �'
Draft Ordinance A
February 25,2003
Page 10 of 12
all-weather surface with slope of less 0.25 •
than 15%
all-weather surface with slope of greater 10.30
than 15%
unimproved surface 0.40
(5) General Neighborhood Character. Using the average lot size of existing lots
(except that lots larger than five (5) acres shall be excluded unless they constitute
more than twenty-five (25) percent of the total number of lots) within a one thousand
(1000) foot radius, the minimum lot size factor based on this performance standard
shall be determined by multiplying the average lot size by 0.2.
(b) Determination of Minimum Lot Size. The minimum lot size shall be determined by
the sum of each of the lot size factors for the performance standards set forth in
subsection (a) of this section.
(1) The most current information shall be used to determine the lot size factor.
Where information is not available, the Planning Director shall determine which lot
size factor shall apply,
(2) If more than one lot size factor can be applied to a lot, the less restrictive factor
shall be used.
(3) Lot size factors shall be based on conditions in existence at the time of filing an
application unless information is included with the application which will alter a lot
size factor. (Ord. 184 § 2, 1989; Ord. 175 § 2 (part), 1988; Ord. 154 § 2, 1987; Ord.
152 § 2, 1987; Ord. 145 § 3 (part), 1987; Ord. 113 § 2 (part), 1985; Ord. 68 § 9-
3.154, 1983)
9-6.106 Residential accessory uses.
The standards of this section apply to the specific types of residential accessory
structures listed. Agricultural accessory structures for the keeping of animals are
subject to Section 9-6.112.
(a) Accessory Greenhouse. An accessory greenhouse may occupy up to five
hundred (500) square feet per dwelling unit or ten (10) percent of the site, whichever
is smaller. Larger greenhouses are subject to Section 9-6.116 where allowed.
rreSidefl'Gn in the A, S, LSF, F PtSF Zone fnllner
c.�—IRr-c
(1) Limitation GR Use. A guesthouse is not tG be used f9F Fesidential eGGuPanGy
r
of fG� g esthe Asa is not to be used as a rdwelliRg �gni+fG + 1
v7T -c(Zi av wv
(b) Residential Second Units. A residential second unit may be established as an
accessory use to a residence in the RSF-Y or LSF-Y zoninq district as follows:
(1) Lot Size: The net lot area shall be 1-acre minimum. •
Draft Ordinance A
February 25,2003
Page 11 of 12
• (2) Sewer: The second unit shall be connected to City sewer where available.
Secondary engineered septic systems may be approved by the City
Engineer.
(3) Water: The second unit shall be served by a public water supply
(4) Meters: Separate utilities meters may be installed for second units
(5) Floor area: The maximum residential floor area shall be 800 square feet
(6) Parking: One enclosed parking space shall be provided
(7) Setbacks: The same setback requirements of a primary residential dwelling
shall apply to secondary units.
(8) Appearance: The secondary unit shall be architecturally compatible with the
primary residential dwelling.
(9) Grading: Site grading and native tree removals shall be minimized to the
greatest extent possible.
(10) The unit shall be compatible with the surrounding neighborhood
(c) Swimming Pools. Swimming pools, including hot tubs, spas, and related
equipment, may be located within any required side or rear setback, provided that
they are no closer than eighteen (18) inches to a property line, and provided that
they are fenced as required by Section 9-6.128.
(d) Workshops or Studios. Any accessory structure intended solely or primarily for
engaging in artwork, crafts, light hand manufacturing, mechanical work, etc., is
• subject to the following standards when located in a residential zone:
(1) Limits on Use. An accessory structure may be constructed or used as a
workshop or studio in any residential zone solely for noncommercial hobbies or
amusements; for maintenance of the principal structure or yards; for artistic
endeavors such as painting, photography or sculpture; maintenance or mechanical
work on vehicles owned or operated by the occupants; for an approved home
occupation; or for other similar purposes.
(2) Floor Area. A workshop is not to occupy an area greater than fifty (50) percent of
the floor area of the principal structure. (Ord. 68 § 9-6.106, 1983)
Draft Ordinance A
February 25,2003
Page 12 of 12
SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. •
This ordinance shall be effective a 12:01 a.m. on the 31St day after its final passage.
On motion by Council Member and seconded by Council Member
the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ADOPTED:
By:
Jerry L. Clay, Sr., Mayor •
Attest:
Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk
Approved as to form:
Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney
■t
. Attachment 4: Planning Commission Recommendation on General Plan Amendment
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
TO CITY COUNCIL
RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL.
The Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, in a regular session assembled on
February 4, 2003 resolved to recommend that the City Council initiate a General Plan
Amendment and Zone Change to amend General Plan Program HOS 3.1.2. to raise the
minimum living area of second units to 950 square feet based on the benefits of such units in
Planned Development projects.
BE IT RESOLVED that a copy of this recommendation be delivered forthwith by
the Planning Commission Secretary to the City Council of the City of Atascadero.
On motion by Commissioner Kelly, and seconded by Commissioner Jones the foregoing
resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety by the following roll call vote:
•
AYES: Commissioner Fonzi,Jones, Kelley, and Porter (4 )
NOES: Commissioner Bentz ( 1
ABSENT: Commissioner Eddings ( 1
ABSTAIN: none ( 0 )
ADOPTED: February 4, 2003
CITY OF ATASCADERO, CA
Roberta Fonzi
Planning Commission Chairperson
Attest:
•
Warren M. Frace
Planning Commission Secretary
ITEM NUMBER- C-1
DATE: 02/25/2003
n
ia�s o is a
Atascadero City Council
Staff Report- City Manager's Office
Legislative Priorities 2003
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Council:
1. Adopt draft Resolution A establishing the City's legislative priorities for 2003; and,
2. Adopt draft Resolution B providing for a voluntary payroll deduction for Action for
• Better Cities.
DISCUSSION:
The City is continually impacted with legislation at the State and Federal levels. New legislation
often translates to new costs and service requirements; at the same time some new legislation
would benefit Atascadero programs. The City Council, through its strategic planning program,
has agreed to establish a list of legislative priorities. This list represents the typical or most often
faced issues from federal, state and county government. It illustrates the City's position and
empowers Council Members, staff and other officials to take an active role in shaping legislation
helpful to Atascadero and opposing legislation that would be harmful.
The first version of legislative priorities was adopted by the City Council in 2000. Each year, the
Council updates the Resolution to insure the latest priorities are considered. Issues do arise
during the year that require special Council consideration or action. These items are brought up
individually on the Council agenda for discussion and action. This list is used for the City's
general legislative agenda.
As part of the new "Grassroots" effort by the League of California Cities, Mayor Clay has
appointed Council Member O'Malley as the liaison to the Regional Coordinator. The
Coordinator also makes presentations to the County Mayors' group. Attached is a Resolution that
• would provide for a voluntary payroll deduction to assist in funding the organization, Action for
Better Cities. The Resolution would allow Council Members and employees to contribute to the
effort protecting cities.
tft1�
ITEM NUMBER: C-1
DATE: 02/25/2003
•
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ALTERNATIVES: Modify legislative positions included in the Resolution.
ATTACHMENTS:
Draft Resolution A
Draft Resolution B
•
ITEM NUMBER: C- 1
DATE: 02/25/2003
• DRAFT RESOLUTION A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF ATASCADERO
ESTABLISHING THE CITY LEGISLATIVE ACTION PROGRAM AND
PRIORITIES FOR 2003
WHEREAS, the major objective of the City Council is to adopt an aggressive legislative
program which strengthens local government, promotes City goals and defends the City against
legislative actions by State and Federal governments that would weaken local government and/or
take away traditional revenue sources; and
WHEREAS, it is vital to the fiscal health and the self determination of the City to
effectively communicate with State Legislators and Federal representatives in order to favorably
influence State and Federal legislation,regulations and grant requests; and
WHEREAS, the League of California Cities conducts a legislative analysis and advocacy
program on behalf of cities for State issues and major Federal issues; and
WHEREAS, the County has a direct impact upon the quality of life in Atascadero, it is
• imperative that the City maintain quality communications and
WHEREAS, the City desires to be proactive and involved in the governmental decision
making processes directly affecting the City legislative priorities identified in Exhibit "A", the
League of California Cities legislative priorities identified in Exhibit "B", and other selected
issues as may from time to time be recommended by the League of California Cities; and
WHEREAS, a key component of the City's Legislative Action Program is face to face
meetings between City representatives and elected officials at the Federal, State, and County
levels, and coordination with similar efforts made by other local government entities;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of
Atascadero does hereby establish the Legislative Action Priorities for 2003, as set forth in the
attached Exhibit "A", and authorizes staff to take positions on legislation generally consistent
with the Legislation Action Priorities and such other resolutions and recommendations of the
League of California Cities as may be from time to time presented to the City.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that City staff is directed to schedule meetings, as
appropriate and convenient, with our Congressional, State Senate and State Assembly
representatives to discuss and promote the City's legislative program, and to continue efforts to
improve communications and relationships with the County Board of Supervisors and north
county cities to further our interests in land use and water issues.
ITEM NUMBER: C- 1
DATE: 02/25/2003
On motion by Council Member and seconded by Council Member
the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted following roll call vote: •
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Jerry L. Clay, Sr., Mayor
ATTEST:
Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM: .
Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney
•
ITEM NUMBER: C- 1
DATE: 02/25/2003
•
CITY OF ATASCADERO EXHIBIT A
CITY LEGISLATIVE ACTION PRIORITIES FOR 2003
FEDERAL PRIORITIES
• Requiring funding of federally mandated programs including new storm water regulations or
eliminating such mandates
• Promoting continued and increased funding sources for streets and transportation
• Obtaining new funding sources to expand housing opportunities for low- and moderate-
income families.
• Supporting legislation that provides regulatory relief to local government in complying with
the Fair Labor Standards Act and overtime provisions for exempt employees
• Supporting continued funding for the Land and Water Conservation Grant Program
• • Supporting legislation to exempt cities from liability for leakage of hazardous waste
discharge to Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW's) from sewers
• Supporting legislation which strengthens the ability of cities to control their public rights-of—
way and apply zoning regulations relative to the telecommunications industry
• Supporting legislation to increase the availability of grant funding to replace aging
infrastructure of all types; e.g.: streets, bridges, water and sewer systems, etc.
• Supporting legislation which assists welfare reform to work in a positive way and provides
funding for the social service programs of local non-profit organizations
• Obtaining cooperation and prompt approval from the EPA and Army Corps of Engineers for
necessary flood control projects
• Supporting legislative action to retain the existing process of local judicial review of land use
decisions, thus avoiding preemptory, premature intrusion of federal courts into matters best
known to local authorities at the local level
• Opposing mandatory social security for newly hired local governmental employees
• • Promoting Federal efforts toward preservation of open space, coastal resources, signature
land forms, wetlands, and other natural resources or areas threatened by development
(Position must be reviewed by Council prior to any action)
ITEM NUMBER: C- 1
DATE: 02/25/2003
• Supporting legislation that encourages research and development by businesses through tax •
credits or other incentive programs
• Supporting legislation that grants monies to local agencies, educational institutions and non-
profit corporations to provide incubator services to new and small businesses dedicated to
developing new technologies
• Supporting funding for national and international tourism promotion
• Supporting continued funding for CDBG at or above recent levels
• Supporting continued funding for Federal block grants for local law enforcement
• Supporting a sustainable energy policy
STATE PRIORITIES
FINANCE
• Supporting efforts to protect the City from loss of revenues due to State mandates
• Supporting legislation that strengthens opportunities for local fiscal independence
• Returning ERAF
• Supporting legislation to cap the growth of ERAF
• Supporting efforts to "protect, preserve and reform" local government revenue sources"
• Supporting legislation which better assures any reductions in Vehicle License Fees by the
State will be back-filled to local government in a permanent way
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
• Opposing mandated State approval of local General Plan Elements, such as implementing
and compliance with State General Plan Housing element law
• Promoting funding sources to encourage the retrofitting of non-reinforced masonry buildings
• Promoting realistic housing requirements in the Housing Element
• Promoting the concept of Urban Growth Boundaries •
• Promote the City of Atascadero's Principles for Smart Growth as adopted by the City Council
U �
ITEM NUMBER: C- I
DATE: 02/25/2003
. Promote State assistance to meet affordable housing goals.
PUBLIC SAFETY
• Preserving city's authority to investigate police misconduct
• Preserving city's authority to establish emergency medical service levels
• Increasing City authority to regulate group homes for juvenile offenders
• Continuing support for disaster preparedness/earthquake preparedness
• Supporting efforts to secure higher levels of cost recovery for DUI's
• Supporting efforts to expand the scope of parental responsibility for crimes committed by
minors
• Supporting efforts to provide the Governor with authority to override the parole board when
anyone convicted of a violent offense is proposed to be released on parole
• • Preserving the authority of local control on issuance of concealed weapons permits
• Retaining budget commitments for Public Safety supplemental funding — State COPS
program
• Supporting legislation to help curb underage drinking
• Supporting another ABC inspector to work on minor/alcohol issues
• Supporting legislation enhancing penalties for inmate offenses at the State Hospital
• Opposing new or increased state fees for state provided law enforcement service
• Support legislation enhancing Megan's Law or regulating the movement of registered sex
offenders
TRANSPORTATION
• Changing Gas tax laws to allow local tax for transportation purposes based on a majority vote
of the public
• • Increasing transportation funding(including transit, bicycles, others)
• Support Cal Trans to complete the Highway 41/Highway 101 Interchange
ITEM NUMBER: C- 1
DATE: 02/25/2003
r
PERSONNEL/EMPLOYEE RELATIONS
• Further reforming Worker's compensation
• Preserving the fiscal integrity of PERS
• Opposing binding arbitration and expansion of the "Peace Officers' Bill of Rights"
• Monitoring employee healthcare/benefit changes
PUBLIC WORKS
• Better defining"qualified"bidders in public contracts bidding
• Redefining Prevailing wages as "average" local wages
• Streamlining Federal and State process for funding street projects
• Increase to $20,000 limits of work (from $5,000) for public projects not requiring
competitive bidding
• Obtaining grant funding for seismic retrofit projects (buildings, bridges, etc.)
PARKS AND RECREATION
• Supporting recreational programming,particularly for youth within the City
• Supporting funding for: protection of natural resources (e.g., the Lake), open space, and parks
development
• Supporting funding for rehabilitation of existing parks
• Supporting efforts at the State level for a park and open space bond measure
• Improving the timeliness and accuracy of fingerprinting for volunteers
• Obtaining grant funding for the preservation of historic buildings
UTILITIES
• Providing funding for reclaimed water programs
G N Y'
ITEM NUMBER: C- 1
DATE: 02/25/2003
• • Supporting legislation to enhance local government's ability to comply with solid waste
requirements
• Supporting legislation to increase availability of grant funding for replacement of aging
infrastructure
• Supporting legislation to eliminate mandatory penalties for violations of NPDES
Requirements and returning discretionary control to the Regional Water Quality Control
Board Executive Officers. (Repeal SB 709)
• Supporting legislation which will enhance market development for recycled materials
• Supporting legislation to exempt cities from liability for leakage of hazardous waste
discharged to POTW's from sewers
• Supporting legislation promoting the responsible and cost-effective reuse of biosolids
• Supporting legislation to streamline the state regulatory permit process through the use of
general permits
• COUNTY PRIORITIES
• Protect Atascadero water resources, and continue to support the Nacimiento Pipeline Project
• Developing consistency between the City and County General Plans, particularly to
emphasize the concepts that (1) urban development should be municipal, and (2)
unincorporated areas shall remain rural, agricultural, or open space in character
• Creating a North County Government Center in Atascadero
• Improving regional solid waste management
• Developing cooperative approaches for providing services on a regional basis
• Discussing and resolving issues on the City periphery, such as conversion of agricultural
zoning to residential subdivision and industrial use, allowing increases in density in
residential and industrial areas, allowing substantial development beyond the City's urban
reserve line and giving greater credence to and respecting the integrity of the City's planning
process
• Continuing to work with other cities to convince the County that urban-like development
• should take place within the boundaries of cities, and not in the unincorporated areas — and
especially not within the urban growth boundaries of cities
etc
ITEM NUMBER: C-1
DATE: 02/25/2003
•
EXHIBIT B
News and Information > About the League of California Cities > League Strategic Plan >
2003 Strategic Goals and Strategies
2003 Strategic Goals and Strategies
] Protect City Services and Revenues from State Budget Cuts
Expand the Supply of Housing in California In Balance With the Location of
® Jobs
(, Restore Public Confidence in Government, Particularly City Government
2003 Proposed Strategies (for consideration by the League Board of Directors at
their meeting February 7-8, 2003)
PROTECT CITY SERVICES, AND-REVENUES FROM STATE BUDGET CUT
• Continue and expand the LOCAL Coalition, engaging local governments in partnership with •
community groups, employees, businesses and others to protect local government services
from reduction by the legislature and governor.
• Meet with legislators, staff, editorial boards, and community groups in legislative districts about
the impacts of cuts in local services and revenues.
• Join with other Local Coalition partners in implementing one or more events in Sacramento
such as Legislative Action Days.
• Develop earned media campaign to help tell the local government story. Offer budget-
balancing suggestions to state leaders.
• Form one or more groups to advise the board on the sponsorship of a ballot measure in 2004
to protect local services and revenues.
• Explore and form partnerships with other groups interested in securing voter protection of local
government services and revenues.
GOAL2
EXP ANfJ THE; SUPPLY OF HOUSINGIN.;CALIFORNIA IN BALANCE WI
• Form a Housing Opportunity Task Force to develop legislative action agenda for 2003
legislative session.
• Explore and develop partnerships with CRA, CBIA, Housing California and other groups •
interested in similar legislative objectives.
L-..-:.--
U4
ITEM NUMBER: C- 1
DATE: 02/25/2003
• opportunities.
• Develop earned media program to counter attacks on city governments and to tell the positive
story about city efforts to expand housing opportunities.
• Explore development of 2004 ballot measure that would produce adequate revenues to
finance the cost of serving new housing development.
GOAL RESTORE �'URL�IC COWIDENGE�IN GOVERNMENT, P/�RTICU)-ABLY C
I
W, :..
• Form an Ethics Education Task Force to evaluate current education offerings by the League
for elected and appointed officials.
• Evaluate the need to develop ethics education and certification programs for elected and
appointed city officials.
• Explore and implement expanded distance ethics learning (i.e., online) programs.
• Evaluate current League programs for recognizing excellence in ethics in city government and
assess need for new programs.
• Work with the Institute for Local Self-Government, CSAC, CSBA and other local government
• groups to assess the need for new ethics education and training.
• Implement appropriate public relations or member education programs after completion of
earlier strategies.
Sub-units will report their activities in support of the League's strategic goals two weeks before most
League board meetings, according to the following schedule:
................. _. _
1
Board Meeting
Sub-unit reports due
February 7 8, 2003 113anuary 24, 2003
=April 4-_5, 2003 March 21 2003
July 18-19, 2003 _ _._._. July 12, 2003
October 7 and 10, 2003 None
__.... __......._ _.__.._.._..._ ... __ ._....._... __.._.. _.., ......... ...... ..__
November 14-15, 2003 November 1, 2003 (final report)
r
ITEM NUMBER: C-1
DATE: 02/25/2003
DRAFT RESOLUTION B •
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF ATASCADERO FOR
THE VOLUNTARY CHECK-OFF PROGRAM
WHEREAS, as a general rule, communities are in a better position than State
government to make decisions governing local affairs, educate the citizenry as to the benefits of
strong local government, and advocate on behalf of cities; and
WHEREAS, measures enacted through the legislative process, as well as by statewide
ballot initiatives, over the past 20 years have produced the unintended consequences of
destabilizing city finances and have weakened the ability of city residents to govern local affairs
through their elected community representatives; and
WHEREAS, several statewide commissions and study groups are preparing
recommendations for local government reform which may be considered by the voters through
the initiative process, and cities may wish to propose changes proactively, as well; and
WHEREAS, many of the "local government reform" changes proposed by others which
will appear on a statewide ballot are likely to further weaken constitutional protections of local
self-determination unless information is provided to the voters using conventional campaign
methods; and •
WHEREAS, Action for Better Cities was created by the Board of Directors of the
League of California Cities for that purpose; and
WHEREAS, elected and appointed officials in local government have the opportunity to
provide leadership in Action for Better Cities through voluntary financial assistance; and
WHEREAS, monies collected by Action for Better Cities shall be limited to those
programs and efforts intended specifically for strengthening the position of local government.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Atascadero that:
Section One. There is hereby established the Voluntary Contribution Check-Off
Program of the City of Atascadero.
Section Two. Any nonrepresented employee or member of the City Council of the City
of Atascadero is eligible to participate in the Program. Employees represented by a bargaining
unit only may participate if the Voluntary Contribution Check-Off Program is authorized by their
representatives.
Section Three. The purpose of the Program is to allow an employee or a member of the
City Council to direct the City of Atascadero to remit a portion of the salary to charitable,
educational, governmental, or other purposes for which non-profit mutual benefit corporations
are organized.
Section Four. Participation in the Program is voluntary. '
ITEM NUMBER: C- 1
DATE: 02/25/2003
Section Five. The City Manager is directed to do all things necessary proper and to
implement the Program established by this Resolution including, but not limited to, preparing
appropriate forms to be completed by participating employees and city council members,
informing city council members of the full range of charitable, educational, governmental, or
other purposes for which non-profit mutual benefit corporations are organized, carrying out the
direction of the participating employees or city council members by remitting a portion of their
salary as stated in the appropriate forms.
Section Six. In establishing this Program, the City Council specifically wishes to make
its support known for a voluntary contribution check-off to support the mission and objectives of
Action for Better Cities.
On motion by Council Member and seconded by Council Member
the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Jerry L. Clay, Sr., Mayor
ATTEST:
Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney
T�
ITEM NUMBER: C-2
DATE: 02/27/2003
r.
1 8 1979
Atascadero City Council
Staff Report- Public Works Department
2003 Community Development Block Grant Allocation
RECOMMENDATION:
City Council forward to the County Board of Supervisors allocation recommendations for the
2003 Community Development Block Grant(CDBG) funds as follows:
Public Facilities
North County Women's Resource Center/Shelter—Painting 3,000
North County Women's Resource Center/Shelter—Restroom Renovation 3,400
City of Atascadero—Elevator for Youth Center 35,000
City of Atascadero—Wheelchair ramps/Lighted Crosswalks 22,000
• Public Services—Maximum 15% = $34,151
El Camino Homeless Organization—$3,500 Vouchers - $8,000 Op. Expenses 11,500
E.O.C.—Forty Wonderful Program—Health Screening 2,000
E.O.C.—Senior Health Screening 4,000
E.O.C. - Teen Parenting Program 3,600
Literacy Council—Atascadero Program 2,500
Community Services Foundation—Youth Activity Scholarship Fund 7,500
Big Brothers Big Sisters—Atascadero Program 3,000
Planning and Capacity Building
Cuesta College—Small Business Development Center 3,000
,,Code Enforcement
City of Atascadero-Code Enforcement 85,000
Administration
City Program Administration Costs—Maximum 20% 42,174
Total 2003 CDBG Grant Funds Available $227,674
DISCUSSION:
Background: Preparation of the 2003 CDBG Consolidated Plan began in the fall of 2002.
Workshops were held throughout the County to solicit public comment on community needs.
• The County published a request for CDBG and HOME Investment Partnership Act (HOME)
679
ITEM NUMBER: C-2
DATE: 02/27/2003
proposals. The City received 20 applications for CDBG funds (no requests for HOME funds
were received)totaling $518,994. The City has an estimated $227,674 in CDBG funds available. t
CDBG funds are available for community development activities, which meet at least one of the
three national objectives:
1. A benefit to low and moderate-income persons;
2. Aid in the prevention or elimination of blight;
3. Address urgent needs that pose a serious and immediate threat to the health or
welfare of the community.
In order for a program to qualify under the low and moderate income objective, at least 51%0 of
the persons benefiting from the project or program must earn no more than 80% of the area
median. Additionally, at least 70% of the CDBG funds must be spent toward this objective.
The following criteria should also be used to guide selection of CDBG programs:
1. The proposal is consistent with the national objectives and eligibility criteria of
the HUD CDBG program;
2. The proposal is consistent with the Urban County Consolidated Plan;
3. The proposal is consistent with the General Plan and other City codes/ordinances.
4. The proposal will achieve multiple community development objectives;
5. The proposal can be implemented in a timely manner, without significant
environmental,policy,procedural, legal, or fiscal obstacles to overcome; and •
6. The project is not financially feasible without CDBG funding.
Summary
The following is a summary by category of each application received:
PUBLIC FACILITIES
North County Women's Resource Center—Painting of Shelter
Funds Requested: $7,700
Recommended Funding: $3,000
North County Women's Resource Center provides assistance to women and children who are
victims of domestic violence. Approximately 95% of their clients meet the low to very low-
income criteria. The proposed project would clean,patch and paint the exterior and interior walls
of the Atascadero Shelter.
ITEM NUMBER: C-2
DATE: 02/27/2003
North County Women's Resource Center—Restroom Renovation
Funds Requested: $3,400
Recommended Funding: $3,400
This proposed project is the renovation of the second restroom in the 32-year-old Atascadero
Domestic Violence Shelter. There are visible signs of water and mold damage.
City of Atascadero—Elevator for Youth/Community Center
Funds Requested: $65,000
Recommended Funding: $35,000
Funds are requested for the installation of an elevator at the Youth Center at 5493 Traffic Way.
The construction of a second story will provide additional space for meetings, game rooms, and
classrooms. This request augments $30,000 in 2000 grant funds awarded for removal of
architectural barriers in City facilities.
City of Atascadero—Wheelchair Ramps/Lighted Crosswalks
Funds Requested: $50,000
Recommended Funding_$22,000
This project provides for the installation of wheelchair ramps and a lighted crosswalk in the
downtown area to improve access and safety. This project qualifies as removal of architectural
• barriers. Staff recommends reallocating $28,000 in 1994 CDBG funds previously awarded to the
Carlton Hotel Seismic retrofit project to bring the total for this project to $50,000.
PUBLIC SERVICES
El Camino Homeless Organization—Manager/Vouchers
Funds Requested: $44,475
Recommended Funding: $11,500
ECHO operates a facility to provide meals for the homeless. They provide space for clients to
meet with counselors, housing specialists, medical personnel and volunteers. $3,500 is
recommended for motel vouchers and $8,000 for Eligible Operating Expenses.
Economic Opportunity Commission—Forty Wonderful Program
Funds Requested: $2,000
Recommended Funding: $2,000
E.O.C. is requesting funding from all agencies for the "Forty Wonderful Program" which is
designed to improve access to medical services, early detection and intervention of chronic
diseases and reduce mortality for low-income women age 40 and older.
ITEM NUMBER: C-2
DATE: 02/27/2003
Economic Opportunity Commission—Senior Health Screening •
Funds Requested: $5,000
Recommended Funding: $4,000
E.O.C. is also requesting funds from all agencies to support the Senior Health Screening
program. Funds would cover testing and expenses.
Economic Opportunity Commission—Teen Parenting Program
Funds Requested: $3,600
Recommended Funding: $3,600
The Teen Parenting Program ensures that pregnant and parenting teens receive health and
education support.
Literacy Council—Atascadero Program
Funds Requested: $3,000
Recommended Funding: $2,500
This organization is requesting funds to recruit and prepare volunteers as tutors. Client
information will be collected to ensure compliance with income.
Atascadero Community Services Foundation—Youth Activity Scholarship Fund
Funds Requested: $7,500 •
Recommended Funding: $7,500
The Community Services Foundation has established a scholarship fund to assist families of low-
income youth to participate in recreational and social activities. Because this program is limited
to low-income youth, the benefit criteria will be met.
Big Brothers/Big Sisters—Mentoring Program
Funds Requested: $7,500
Funding Recommended: $3,000
This organization is requesting funding to be used for Empowerment Training for at-risk children
and their guardians and for volunteer training for Big Brothers and Big Sisters.
PLANNING AND CAPACITY BUILDING
Cuesta College—Small Business Development Center
Funds Requested: $3,000
Recommended Funding: $3,000
Funds are requested to provide business consulting for existing and start-up businesses for low to
middle income residents and business owners in San Luis Obispo County.
�2.-
ITEM NUMBER: C-2
DATE: 02/27/2003
• CODE ENFORCEMENT
City of Atascadero—Code Enforcement
Funds Requested: $110,000
Recommended Funding: $85,000
This program would provide code enforcement services for low-income, deteriorated and
redevelopment areas where addressing the violations could be expected to arrest the decline of
the area.
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FUNDING THIS YEAR
Economic Opportunity Commission—Sewer Connection and Fees
Funds Requested: $36,631
Recommended Funding: $0
EOC is requesting funding to connect their property at 965 El Camino Real to the public sewer
system. This property currently consists of three structures: a single-family residence and two
buildings used for Head Start programs. Costs related to the connection are engineering,
construction, permit and reimbursement fees.
Of the total requested, $9,560 represents reimbursement for the construction of the lines and lift
• station, and are not eligible under HUD regulations.
Homeless Housing Proiect—Motel Voucher Program
Funds Requested: $24,000
Funding Recommended: $0
The Homeless Housing Project is requesting funds to provide motel vouchers to the homeless
population. Staff is recommending awarding funds for this service to the El Camino Homeless
Organization to be distributed in conjunction with their church shelter program.
The Harvest Bag—Food Bank
Funds Requested: $8,000
Funding Recommended: $0
The Harvest Bag is a non-profit organization that operates a food distribution program in Arroyo
Grande, with delivery throughout the county. They have requested a total of$40,000 from four
cities and the County for the purchase of a delivery truck, warehouse rental and operating
expenses.
In 2001, the City awarded $24,000 to The Food Bank Coalition for the purchase of warehouse
property in Paso Robles, which is serving the needs of this area.
��3
ITEM NUMBER: C—2
DATE: 02/27/2003
Atascadero Christian Home—Various Equipment •
Funds Requested: $14,595
Funding Recommended: $0
Atascadero Christian Home is requesting funds to purchase various items including mattresses,
EZ stand, tub chair, Karaoke machine and exercise equipment. Some of the equipment would be
used exclusively at the Country Care Convalescent Hospital and other items would be shared
between the facilities.
Staff is not recommending funding at this time due to limited Public Service funds. Also,
Country Care Convalescent Hospital is outside of the city limit and therefore eligible to apply for
County funds.
Economic Opportunity Commission—Home Repair Program
Funds Requested: $20,000
Recommended Funding: $0
This program provides needed home repairs for lower income families, seniors and disabled
individuals. These repairs include the removal of architectural barriers, roof repairs, plumbing
repairs, etc.
E.O.C. currently.has over $35,000 available for this program from 2000 and 2001 awards. Due
to HUD requirements that funds be spent in a timely manner, staff is not recommending funding •
during this cycle.
People's Self Help Housing—Property Renovation
Funds Requested: $86,059
Funding Recommended: $0
People's Self Help Housing acquired this property in 1999 with the assistance of an $80,000
CDBG grant from the City. At this time they are requesting funds to convert the existing office
and laundry room to an apartment unit, construct a new office and laundry room, perform
building repairs and landscaping.
Due to the high cost for the addition of one housing unit, staff is not recommending funding at
this time.
FISCAL IMPACT: Available funds are estimated at$227,674 for the 2003 cycle.
ALTERNATIVES:
Council may modify the grant recommendations made by Staff. However, awards must meet •
program requirements, providing a minimum of 70% of funding for benefit to low- and
moderate-income persons, and no more than 15% can be allocated to public service items.
\U"i�e 4