Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 02/11/2003 PUBLIC NOTICE ADDENDUM TO ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL AGENDA THE FOLLOWING ITEM IS HEREBY ADDED TO THE AGENDA FOR February 11, 2003 A. CONSENT CALENDAR: • 12. Final Parcel Map 2002-0036 - ATAL 00-192 LLA 94005 AT'-[LLA AL 94-002] [LLA2000-0005 ATAL 00-192] 3-F Meadows (3-F Meadows/Shetler) ■ Staff recommendation: City Council: 1. Accept Final Parcel Map 2002-0036 (ATAL 00-192) 2. Reject offers of dedication for Streets and the dedication of Lots A, B, and C, and Open Space Easements without prejudice to future acceptance. 3. Authorize City Manager to Execute a Performance Agreement with Castlerock Development. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO ) CITY OF ATASCADERO ) MARCIA MCCLURE TORGERSON,being fully sworn,deposes,and says: That she is the duly elected City Clerk of the City of Atascadero and that on February 6, 2003, she caused the above Notice to be posted on the doors of the City's Administration Building,6500 Palma Avenue in Atascadero,California. i MARCIA MCCLURE TORGERSON City Clerk City of Atascadero • ,III ITEM NUMBER: A-12 DATE: .'m �'��f m,�ry 02/11/2003 ilia ®, iaia i Atascadero City Council Staff Report— Public Works Department Final Parcel Map 2002-0036 (ATAL 00-192) [LLA 94005 ATAL 94-002] [LLA 2000-0005 ATAL 00-192] 3-F Meadows (3-F Meadows/Shetler) RECOMMENDATIONS: Council: 1. Accept Final Parcel Map 2002-0036 (ATAL 00-192) 2. Reject offers of dedication for Streets and the dedication of Lots A, B, and C, and Open Space Easements without prejudice to future acceptance. • 3. Authorize City Manager to Execute a Performance Agreement with Castlerock Development. DISCUSSION: The City Council approved Lot Line Adjustment 94005 (ATAL 94-002), Road Abandonment 94-001, and Zone Change 94-001 on February 28, 1995. Lot Line Adjustment 2000-0005 (ATAL 00-192) was found to be in conformance with Lot Line Adjustment Map 94005 (ATAL 94-002). Zone Change 94-001 established a PD-11 overlay for the project area. PD-11 establishes a number of unique development standards for the project some of which affect the acceptance of the final map. All of the requirements of PD-1.1 have been completed regarding the acceptance of the final map. PD-11 Final Map Requirements: (1)To ensure conformance with the provisions of the PD-11 Overlay Zone, a Master Plan of Development shall be prepared which satisfies all of the following conditions prior to the recordation of any final document implementing Lot Line Adjustment 94-005. The Master Development Plan shall consist of the 1"=40'feet plans entitled "Precise Road Alignment/Lot Grading Plan" amended and supplemented as required by these conditions. • The Community Development Director approved the Master Plan of Development on February 5, 2003. ITEM NUMBER: A-12 DATE: 02/11/2003 (3)The applicant shall demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the City Attorney, that adequate title and/or interest has been obtained for the existing Colony rights-of-way within the project boundary prior to approval of the Master Development Plan. The City Attorney has approved the Title Insurance showing adequate interest in the Colony rights-of-ways. (4)The Master Development Plan shall show the location of building envelopes, leach field areas, and driveways for lots whose average slope exceeds thirty percent (30%).The building, leach field and driveway locations shall be subject to the review and approval of the Community Development Director. The Community Development Director approved the Master Plan of Development on February 5, 2003. (6) The "Open Space" lots (Lots A, B and C) as shown on Exhibit B shall be offered for dedication to the City. The Open Space lots A, B and C are offered for dedication on the final map. Staff is recommending rejection of the offers. (v) All improvements shall be completed or bonded for prior to the approval of the Master Development Plan. If the improvements are to be bonded, the applicant shall enter into a Performance Agreement with the City. The form and content of the Performance Agreement shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and City Attorney. The City Attorney has approved the Performance Agreement. • Pursuant to California Government Code Section 66440 the approving legislative body (City Council) cannot deny a final map that is consistent with an approved tentative lot line adjustment map. The legislative body is also required to accept, accept subject to improvement or reject, on behalf of the public, any real property offered for dedication for public use in conformity with the terms of the offer of dedication. Staff recommends rejecting the offer of dedication for streets and Lots'A, B, and C, and open space easements without prejudice to future acceptance. Staff has determined that the Final Parcel Map is consistent with approved Lot Line Adjustment, PD-11 and the project EIR. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A: Final Parcel Map 2002-0036 (ATAL 00-192) Exhibit B: Performance Agreement • Exhibit A Final Parcel Map 2002-0036(ATAL 00-192) 3-F Meadows N O 0 a 4�1 4 CL m � a: a. B � r ` r - y \ r \i a AXIS i ,z i V gel < 1 y m Ile 1 � o t c $ t ` n m n m � � n t I 1 r�-- __-__ 1-•L. rl n.. • FOR RECORDER USE ONLY i RECORDING REQUESTED BY: City of Atascadero WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: City Clerk City of Atascadero 6500 Palma Avenue Atascadero, CA. 93422 CITY OF ATASCADERO PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT DATE OF AGREEMENT: NAME OF DEVELOPER: Castlerock Development, a California Corporation DEVELOPMENT: 3F Meadows ESTIMATED TOTAL COST OF IMPROVEMENTS: $ 1,500,306.00 This Agreement made and entered into by and between the City of Atascadero, a muni ci al • corporation of the State of California (hereinafter referred to as"City"), and Castlerock Development, a California Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Developer"). RECITALS A. Developer has requested development of the property know as 3-F Meadows (hereinafter referred to as "Project") in the City of Atascadero. A Master Development Plan for the Project is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" to this Agreement. This property is shown on the City Zoning Map and is designated as Planned Development Overlay Zone No. 11. The conditions of development for Planned Development Overlay Zone No. 11 are described in the Atascadero Municipal Code Section 9-3.656 (hereinafter referred to as "PD-11 Conditions"). B. Developer has requested that the City approve and record final Lot Line Adjustment 2000-0005 (aka ATAL 00-192) and approve the related Master Development Plan prior to the completion of improvements required by PD-11 Conditions. C. In consideration of approval of final Lot Line Adjustment 2000-0005 (aka ATAL 00- 192) and the Master Development Plan, Developer desires to enter into this Agreement, whereby Developer promises to install and complete, at Developer's own expense, certain public improvements required by City in connection with the Project. D. The Master Development Plan attached hereto as Exhibit "A" depicts specified collector roads that are to be constructed as a condition to approval by the City of the Master . 3F Meadows Agreement Page 1 of 4 Development Plan. These collector roads are referred to hereinafter as "the Onsite Public • Improvements". E. In addition to the Onsite Public Improvements, there are certain offsite public improvements that must be constructed by Developer in connection with the Project pursuant to Atascadero Municipal Code Section 9-3.656(c)(3). These offsite public improvements are described in Exhibit "B" attached to this Agreement. The offsite public improvements described in Exhibit B are hereinafter referred to as the "Offsite Public Improvements". F. An estimate of the cost for construction of the Onsite and Offsite Public Improvements has been made, approved by the City Engineer and is referred to hereinafter as the "Estimated Total Cost of Improvements". The Estimated Total Cost of Improvements is stated on Page 1 of this Agreement. The basis for the estimate is attached as Exhibit "C" to this Agreement. G. Developer recognizes that by approval of final Lot Line Adjustment 2000-0005 (aka ATAL 00-192) and the Master Development Plan, City will conferred substantial rights upon Developer, including the right to sell, lease, or finance lots within the Project. City will be damaged to the extent of the cost of installation of the Onsite and Offsite Public Improvements should Developer fail to perform its obligations under this Agreement. City shall be entitled to all remedies available to it pursuant to this Agreement and law in event of default by Developer. . NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the provisions contained in PD-11, and in consideration of the approval of the final Lot Line Adjustment 2000-0005 (aka ATAL 00-192) and the Master Development Plan, the parties hereto do promise and agree one with the other as follows. 1. Developer is to make and complete the Onsite and Offsite Public Improvements within three years from the date of issuance of the first residential building permit. 2. Developer promises and agrees to complete all Onsite and Offsite Public Improvements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 3. If said improvement work is not completed within three years of the date of issuance of the first residential building permit, Developer agrees that City may elect to complete the same. 4. In the event City elects to complete the Onsite or Offsite Public Improvements, Developer agrees that City may exercise it's option to declare the bond or deposit, as hereinafter described, forfeited and utilize the proceeds, including any interest, to complete said improvements or that City may complete said improvements and recover full cost and expense thereof including reasonable attorney fees from Developer and his surety. 5. Developer shall, prior to or concurrent with receiving approval of the Final Lot Line Adjustment Map, file improvement securities with City, in a form acceptable to the City Attorney;(1) Performance Guarantee in the amount of one hundred percent (100%) of the Estimated Total Cost of Improvements, which is the amount deemed sufficient by the City Engineer; and (2) Labor and Materials Guarantee in the amount of fifty percent (50%) of the • Estimated Total Cost of Improvements. 3F Meadows Agreement Page 2 of 4 6. The Labor and Materials Guarantee-will be released when the improvements are deemed substantially complete by the City Engineer. Developer hereby agrees that after the completion and acceptance of the Onsite and Offsite Public Improvement, ten percent(10%) of the Performance Guarantee shall be retained for the guarantee and warranty of the work for a period of one year. The remaining ninety percent(90%) shall be released and returned to Developer. 7. It is understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto that this Agreement shall bind the heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns of the respective parties to this agreement. 8. In the event legal action is taken to enforce the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover costs to enforce the Agreement, including reasonable attorney fees. 9. Developer shall, defend, indemnify and save harmless City, its officers, agents and employees from any and all claims, demands, damages, costs, expenses, or liability occasioned by the performance and attempted performance of the provisions hereof, or in any way arising out of this Agreement, including, but not limited to, inverse condemnation, equitable relief, or any wrongful act or any negligent act or omission to act on the part of Developer or of agents, employees, or independent contractors directly responsible to Developer, unless a particular improvement was specifically required by City over written objection by Developer submitted to the City Engineer, providing further that the foregoing shall apply to any wrongful acts, or any actively or passively negligent acts or omissions to act, committed jointly or concurrently by Developer, Developer's agents, employees, or independent contractors. Nothing contained in the foregoing indemnity provisions shall be construed to require Developer to indemnify City against any responsibility or liability in • contravention of Section 2782 of the Civil Code. 10. Upon acceptance of the work on behalf of City and recordation of the Notice of Completion, ownership of the improvements constructed pursuant to this Agreement shall vest in City or any other municipal or state jurisdiction that owns the land that has been improved. 13. Sale or other disposition of this property will not relieve Developer from the obligations set forth herein. Developer agrees to notify City in writing at least 30 days in advance of any actual or pending sale or other disposition of the property. If Developer sells the property or any portion of the property within the Subdivision to any other person, Developer may request a novation of this Agreement and a substitution of security. Upon approval of the novation and substitution of securities, Developer may request a release or reduction of the securities required by this Agreement. Nothing in the novation shall relieve Developer of the obligations under Paragraph 2 for the work or improvement done by Developer. 14. The provisions of this Agreement are severable. If any portion of this Agreement is held invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect unless amended or modified by the mutual consent of the parties. 15. The Recitals to this Agreement are hereby incorporated into the terms of this Agreement. • 3F Meadows Agreement Page 3 of 4 • 16. All notices required or provided for under this Agreement shall be in writing and delivered in person or sent by mail, postage prepaid and addressed as provided in this section. Notice shall be effective on the date it is delivered in person, or, if mailed, on the date of deposit in the United States Mail. Notices shall be addressed as follows unless a written change of address is filed with City: City: City of Atascadero 6500 Palma Avenue Atascadero, CA 93422 Developer: Castlerock Development, a California Corporation 202 H-3 Tank Farm Road San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 17. This Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter. All modifications, amendments, or waivers of the terms of this Agreement must be in writing and signed by the appropriate representatives of the parties. In the case of City, the appropriate party shall be its City Manager. IN WITNESS WHEREOF Developer has hereunto set his hand and City has caused these presents to be signed by its duly sworn and authorized officers the day and year first hereinabove written. . CITY OF ATASCADERO DEVELOPER ��Z Wade G. McKinney, City Manager rren Shetler, President Castlerock Development, a California Corporation (notarize signature) Attest: Marcia M. Torgerson, City Clerk App iced as to co tent: Steven B. Kahn, City Engineer A oved as to f rm L . • Hanley, City ney 3F Meadows Agreement Page 4 of 4 EXHIBIT— "B" 3F Meadows Offsite Public Improvements Certain offsite public improvements must be constructed by Developer in connection with the 3F • Meadows Project pursuant to Atascadero Municipal Code Section 9-3.656(c)(3). These offsite public improvements are described as follows: (3) Road Improvements--Off-Site. (i) Curve widening shall be constructed on Los Altos Road from Highway 41 to San Marcos Road where curve radii is less than two hundred (200)feet. Curve widening shall be constructed in conformance with Section 4, Paragraph F of the City Standard Specifications, or as approved by the City Engineer. Plans for the curve widening shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer prior to the approval of the Master Development Plan. The curve widening on Los Altos Road shall be constructed when the ADT on Los Altos Road reaches five hundred (500)vehicles per day, with the development of the twenty- seventh lot in Phase 1, or within three (3)years of the issuance of building permits for Phase 1, whichever is earlier. (ii) A "Stop" sign and stop bar shall be constructed at the intersection of Los Altos Road and San Marcos Road and shall be constructed with the development of Phase 1 of the project and prior to the issuance of building permits. (Note: This requirement has been satisfactorily completed by Developer.) (iii) San Marcos Road between Los Altos Road and the project boundary shall be improved preparatory to acceptance of this portion of road into the City maintained system. Curve widening shall be constructed where curve radii is less than two hundred (200) feet. • Curve widening shall be constructed in conformance with Section 4, Paragraph F of the City Standard Specifications, or as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for the curve widening shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer prior to approval of the Master Development Plan. San Marcos Road between Los Altos Road and the project boundary shall be improved prior to the development of Phase 1 of the project and prior to the issuance of building permits. (Note: This requirement has been satisfactorily completed by Developer.) (iv) The applicant shall enter into a maintenance agreement with the City for the portion of San Marcos Road between Los Altos Road and the project boundary. The agreement shall guarantee that damage to the road which results from construction traffic generated by the development of the project is properly repaired. The agreement shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and the City Attorney. The agreement shall remain in-force throughout construction of Phase 1 and Phase 2 of the project. A maintenance security in a form acceptable to the City Attorney and the City Engineer shall be posted for the portion of San Marcos Road between Los Altos Road and the project boundary. The maintenance security shall remain effective until final acceptance of both Phase 1 and Phase 2 of the project. (Note: This requirement has been satisfactorily completed by Developer.) (v) Left-turn lanes shall be constructed on State Highway 41 for eastbound traffic entering both Los Altos Road and the driveway serving Lots 109-112. Improvement plans for the left-turn lanes shall be submitted for review and approval by Caltrans and the City • Engineer prior to approval of the Master Development Plan. 3F Meadows Agreement-Exhibit"B" Page 1 of 3 • The left-turn lanes for Los Altos Road shall be constructed when the ADT on Los Altos Road reaches five hundred (500)vehicles per day, with the development of the twenty- seventh lot in Phase 1, or within three (3)years of the issuance of building permits for Phase 1, whichever is earlier. The left-turn lanes for the driveways accessing Lots 109-112 shall be constructed with the development of any portion of Lots 109-112. (vi) Vehicle refuge lanes shall be constructed for vehicles turning left onto State Highway 41 from both Los Altos Road and the driveway serving Lots 109-112. Improvement plans for the refuge lanes shall be submitted for review and approval by Caltrans and the City Engineer prior to approval of the Master Development Plan. The vehicle refuge lane for Los Altos Road shall be constructed when the ADT on Los Altos Road reaches five hundred (500) vehicles per day, with the development of the twenty- seventh lot in Phase 1, or within three (3)years of the issuance of building permits for Phase 1, whichever is earlier. The vehicle refuge lane for the driveways accessing Lots 109-112 shall be constructed with the development of any portion of Lots 109-112. (vii) The improvements required to achieve a minimum of five hundred fifty (550) feet of sight distance shall be constructed at the intersection of Los Altos Road and State Highway 41 and at the intersection of the driveway serving Lots 109-112 and State Highway 41. Improvement plans for the site distance improvements shall be submitted for review and approval by Caltrans and the City Engineer prior to approval of the Master Development . Plan. The site distance improvements for Los Altos Road shall be constructed when the ADT on Los Altos Road reaches five hundred (500) vehicles per day, with the development of the twenty-seventh lot in Phase 1, or within three (3) years of the issuance of building permits for Phase 1,whichever is earlier. The site distance improvements for the driveways accessing Lots 109-112 shall be constructed with the development of any portion of Lots 109-112. (viii) Advisory and warning signage shall be installed along State Highway 41 to advise drivers of the approaching intersection with Los Altos Road and the driveway serving Lots 109-112. Signage shall be installed which indicates a left-turn lane ahead. Improvement plans for the signage improvements shall be submitted for review and approval by Caltrans and the City Engineer prior to approval of the Master Development Plan. The signage improvements for Los Altos Road shall be constructed when the ADT on Los Altos Road reaches five hundred (500) vehicles per day, with the development of the twenty-seventh lot in Phase 1, or within three (3)years of the issuance of building permits for Phase 1, whichever is earlier. The signage improvements for the driveways accessing Lots 109-112 shall be constructed with the development of any portion of Lots 109-112. (ix) Designated right-turn lanes shall be constructed on State Highway 41 for westbound traffic entering both Los Altos Road and the driveway serving Lots 109-112. Improvement • plans for the right-turn lanes shall be submitted for review and approval by Caltrans and the City Engineer prior to approval of the Master Development Plan. 3F Meadows Agreement-Exhibit"B" Page 2 of 3 The right-turn lane for Los Altos Road shall be constructed when the ADT on Los • Altos Road reaches five hundred (500)vehicles per day, with the development of the twenty- seventh lot in Phase 1, or within three (3)years of the issuance of building permits for Phase 1,whichever is earlier. The right-turn lane for the driveways accessing Lots 109-112 shall be constructed with the development of any portion of Lots 109-112. (x) Curve widening shall be constructed on the following roads where curve radii is less than two hundred (200) feet. Curve widening shall be constructed in conformance with Section 4, Paragraph F of the City Standard Specifications, or as approved by the City Engineer. Plans for the curve widening shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer prior to the approval of the Master Development Plan. a. Laurel Avenue from Santa Lucia Road to Cenegal Road. b. Cenegal Road from Laurel Avenue to the project boundary. The curve widening shall be constructed when the ADT on Laurel Avenue reaches five hundred (500) vehicles per day, with the development of the thirty-eighth lot in Phase 2, or within three (3)years of the issuance of building permits for Phase 2, whichever is earlier. (A) A three-foot wide Class II base or other all weather surface walkway shall be provided along one side Cenegal Road from the project boundary to Laurel Avenue and along Laurel Avenue from Cenegal Road to Santa Lucia Road, or as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for the walkways shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer and Community Development Director prior to approval of the Master Development Plan. The three-foot-wide pedestrian walkway shall be constructed when the ADT on Laurel Avenue reaches five hundred (500) vehicles per day, with the development of the thirty-eighth lot in Phase 2, or within three (3) years of the issuance of building permits for Phase 2, whichever is earlier. • 3F Meadows Agreement-Exhibit"B" Page 3 of 3 EXHIBIT"C" ESTIMATED COST OF IMPROVEMENTS San Marcos and Cenegal Road Improvements Item Quantity Unit Cost/Unit Cost EARTHWORK CLEAR AND GRUB 1.00 LS 7,500.00 7,500.00 EARTHWORK CUT AND FILL 119,157.00 CY 1.50 178,735.50 RETAINING WALLS COMPLETE 875.00 LF 56.00 49,000.00 HYDROSEED&RE-VEGETATE SLOPES 35.00 AC 1,040.00 36,400.00 STRAW BALES 520.80 EA 5.61 2,921.69 TOTAL EARTHWORK 274,557.19 PAVING AND SURFACING CLASS 2 BASE UNDER ASPHALT-7.5" 8,990.87 TONS 10.41 93,594.95 ASPHALT PAVING-2.5" 3,182.00 TONS 43.72 139,117.04 ASPHALT DRIVEWAY APRONS-18'WIDE 15.00 EA 50.08 751.20 STRIPING&PAINTING 9,913.00 LF 0.44 4,361.72 TOTAL PAVING AND SURFACING 237,824.91 WATER WATER LINES, 10"PVC MAIN 9,913.00 LF 17.00 168,521.00 WATER SERVICE ASMBLY, 1"-INCLUDES PIPING 15.00 LS 325.00 4,875.00 WATER VALVE, 10" VALVE ASSEMBLY 10.00 EA 1,126.74 11,267.40 FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLIES W/GATE VALVE 20.00 EA 1,224.00 24,480.00 BLOW OFF ASSEMBLIES 3.00 EA 475.00 1,425.00 AIR&VAC RELIEF ASSEMBLIES 3.00 EA 250.00 750.00 TOTAL WATER 211,318.40 • STORM SEWER SINGLE DROP O.S. DRAIN WITH A.C. DIKE 35.00 EA 236.00 8,260.00 24"CMP STORM DRAIN 2,008.00 LF 11.89 23,880.67 36"CMP STORM DRAIN 425.60 LF 17.15 7,299.57 HEADWALL STRUCTURE 2.00 EA 1,438.00 2,876.00 BENCH DRAIN 372.00 LF 15.00 5,580.00 V-BROW DITCH 189.00 LF 1.72 325.08 300 LBS. ROCK RIP-RAP @ FLARED END 26.00 TN 40.00 1,040.00 GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC UNDER RIP-RAP 208.00 SF 3.82 794.56 TOTAL STORM SEWER 50,055.88 UNDERGROUND UTILITIES TRENCHING&BACKFILL 9,913.00 LF 7.78 77,123.14 VAULTS/BOXES 1.00 LS 23,800.13 23,800.13 CONDUIT 7,383.20 LF 2.52 18,605.66 TOTAL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES 119,528.93 TRAFFIC APPURTANCES SIGNS(stop,no parking) 2.00 EA 130.00 260.00 SURVEY MONUMENT WELLS 68.00 EA 250.00 17,000.00 TOTAL TRAFFIC APPURTANCES 17,260.00 SUBTOTAL: $ 910,545 3F Meadows Agreement-Exhibit'C' Page 1 of 3 EXHIBIT "C" ESTIMATED COST OF IMPROVEMENTS Left & Right Turn, Vehicle Refuge Lanes, Advisory &Warning Signs and Sight Distance Improvements at Highway 41 and Lots 109 - 112 Item Quantity Unit Cost/Unit Cost Sawcut Existing Asphalt 1,300 LF 0.80 $ 1,040 Remove Existing Asphalt 47 CUYD 25.00 $ 1,175 Slope Grading 15 CUYD 3.50 $ 53 5"Type"B"Asphalt 95 TN 44.72 $ 4,248 6"Asphalt Dike 45 LF 3.25 $ 146 Class II Base 150 TN 11.41 $ 1,712 Add New Striping 2,312 LF 0.44 $ 1,017 Add Painted"Stop"&Stop Bar 1 LS 150.00 $ 150 Add Stop Sign at corner 1 LS 130.00 $ 130 Add Warning &Advisory Signage 1 LS 1,120.00 $ 1,120 Subtotal: $ 10,791 Curve Widening and Y DG Walkway on Laurel & Cenegal Item Quantity Unit Cost/Unit Cost Sawcut Existing Asphalt 1,755 LF 0.80 $ 1,404 Remove Existing Asphalt 39 CUYD 25.00 $ 978 2.5"Type"B"Asphalt 38 TN 44.72 $ 1,693 Class II Base 96 TN 11.41 $ 1,101 Add New Striping 3,600 LF 0.40 $ 1,440 • Add Painted"Stop"&Stop Bar 1 LS 150.00 $ 150 Stop Sign at Laurel/Santa Lucia 1 LS 130.00 $ 130 Street Name Sign at Laurel/Santa Lucia 1 LS 130.00 $ 130 3"DG Walkway, 3'Wide 420 TN 8.00 $ 3,364 Subtotal: $ 10,390 Curve Widening at Los Altos Item Quantity Unit Cost/Unit Cost Sawcut Existing Asphalt 1,305 LF 0.80 $ 1,044 Remove Existing Asphalt 10 CUYD 25.00 $ 250 Add 2.5"Type"B"Asphalt 46 TN 44.72 $ 2,068 Add 6"Class II Base 118 TN 11.41 $ 1,345 Add 6"AC Dike 405 LF 3.25 $ 1,316 Add Striping 3,200 LF 0.44 $ 1,408 Add Rip-Rap at Existing 36"CMP 3 TN 42.00 $ 126 Grading at Existing 36"CMP 100 SF 2.50 $ 250 Repair 4'x4'Pothole 1 LS 198.00 $ 198 Subtotal: $ 8,005 • 3F Meadows Agreement-Exhibit"C" Page 2 of 3 EXHIBIT"C" ESTIMATED COST OF IMPROVEMENTS Left & Right Turn, Vehicle Refuge Lanes, Advisory &Warning Signs and Sight Distance Improvements at Highway 41 and Los Altos Item Quantity Unit Cost/Unit Cost Sawcut Existing Asphalt 880 LF 0.80 $ 704 Remove Existing Asphalt 39 CUYD 25.00 $ 978 Slope Grading 49 CUYD 3.50 $ 172 5"Type"B"Asphalt 123 TN 44.72 $ 5,498 6"Asphalt Dike LF 3.25 $ - Class II Base 209 TN 11.41 $ 2,385 Extend Existing 24"CMP 3 LF 35.03 $ 105 Add 4'x4'x2'deep Rock Rip-Rap(25#Rock) 0.40 TN 177.00 $ 71 Remove Existing Striping 1,140 LF 0.10 $ 114 Add New Striping 1,360 LF 0.44 $ 598 Add Painted"Stop"&Stop Bar 1 LS 150.00 $ 150 Add Stop Sign at corner 1 LS 130.00 $ 130 Add"Los Altos"Street Name Sign at corner 1 LS 142.00 $ 142 Add Warning &Advisory Signage 1 LS 816.00 $ 816 Subtotal: $ 11,863 Summary of Estimated Costs • San Marcos and Cenegal Road Improvements $ 910,545 Left&Right Turn, Vehicle Refuge Lanes,Advisory&Warning Signs and Sight Distance Improvements at Highway 41 and Lots 109-112 $ 10,791 Curve Widening at Los Altos $ 10,390 Left&Right Turn, Vehicle Refuge Lanes,Advisory&Warning Signs and Sight Distance Improvements at Highway 41 and Los Altos $ 11,863 Subtotal $ 943,589 Contingency @ 3°x6 $ 28,308 Supervision @ 3% $ 28,308 Total Estimated Cost $ 1,000,204 100°x6 Performance Guarantee: $ 1,000,204 50%Labor&Materials Guarantee: $ 500,102 Total Guarantee Amount: $ 1,500,306 • 3F Meadows Agreement-Exhibit"C" Page 3 of 3 CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT No.5907 State of County ofc On `ue« \. �3 before me, t'c� w. V �� c��c �'Lt DATE NAME,TITLE OF OFFICER-E.G.,-JX_NIk DOE,NOTARY PUBLIC- personally appeared NAME(S)OF SIGNER(S) personally known to me - OR - ❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and ac- knowledged to me that he/she/they executed PAMELA VENTRESCA the same in his/her/their authorized U COMM#)33&343 capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their 0 -• NOTARY PUBLIC-CALIFORMAL signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), 2 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY O COMM.EXP.FEB.6,2W6-' or the entity upon behalf of which the -person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. SIGN)�TURE OF NOTARY OPTIONAL • Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT ❑ INDIVIDUAL ❑ CORPORATE OFFICER TITLE(S) TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT ❑ PARTNER(S) ❑ LIMITED ❑ GENERAL ❑ ATTORNEY-IN-FACT NUMBER OF PAGES ❑ TRUSTEE(S) ❑ GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR ❑ OTHER: DATE OF DOCUMENT SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: NAME OF PERSON(S)OR ENTITY(IES) SIGNER(S)OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE 01993 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION•8236 Remmet Ave.,P.O.Box 7184•Canoga Park,CA 91309-7184 MACITY OF A TASCADERO CITY COUNCIL AGENDA TUESDAY, February 11, 2003 7:00 P.M. City of Atascadero 6500 Palma Avenue, 4th Floor Atascadero, California REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: 6:00 P.M. COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION: (Immediately following Redevelopment Agency Meeting and Closed Session) 1. PUBLIC COMMENT - CLOSED SESSION 2. Call to Order a) Conference with legal counsel- Existing litigation (Govt. Code Sec. 54956.9 (a)) 1. Environmental Center of SLO v. City of Atascadero b) Personnel: City Attorney (Govt. Code Sec. 54957.6) 3. Adjourn 4. CLOSED SESSION REPORT REGULAR SESSION: 7:00 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Council Member Pacas ROLL CALL: Mayor Clay Mayor Pro Tem Luna Council Member Scalise Council Member O'Malley Council Member Pacas INTRODUCTIONS: APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Roll Call PRESENTATIONS: 1. Recognition of outgoing Planning Commissioner, Jonelle Norton 2. Recognition of outgoing California Transportation Advisory Committee (CTAC) representative, Dennis Schmidt 3. Proclamation declaring February 25, 2003 "Spay Day USA" 4. San Luis Obispo County Housing Trust Fund -Anita Robinson, Steering Committee Chairperson • Staff recommendation: City Council: 1. Support, in concept,the development of an affordable housing trust fund and agree to work with the SLO Housing Trust Fund to develop a future dedicated revenue source, and; 2. Do not provide financial support for start-up costs at this time. [City Manager] COMMUNITY FORUM: his portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wanting to address the CO (T Council on any matter not on this agenda and over which the Council has jurisdiction. Speakers are limited to five minutes. Please state your name and address for the record before making your presentation. The Council may take action to direct the staff to place a matter of business on a future agenda. A maximum of 30 minutes will ,be allowed for Community Forum, unless changed by the Council.) COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS: (On their own initiative; Council Members may make a brief announcement or a brief report on their own activities. Council Members may ask a question for clarification, make a referral to staff or take action to have staff place a matter of business on a future agenda.The Council may take action on items listed on the Agenda.) • 2 A. CONSENT CALENDAR: (All items on the consent calendar are considered to be routine and non-controversial by City staff and will be approved by one motion if no member of the Council or public wishes to comment or ask questions. If comment or discussion is desired by anyone, the item will be removed from the consent calendar and will be considered in the listed sequence with an opportunity for any member of the public to address the Council concerning the item before action is taken.) 1. City Council Minutes —January 14, 2003 ■ City Clerk recommendation: City Council approve the City Council minutes of January 14, 2003. [City Clerk] 2. City Council Minutes — Strategic Planning Workshop, January 28-29, 2003 ■ City Clerk recommendation: City Council approve the City Council minutes of the Strategic Planning Workshop held on January 28, 2003. [City Clerk] 3. City Treasurer's Report— December 2002 ■ Fiscal impact: None ■ City Treasurer recommendation: City Council approve the City Treasurer's report for December 2002. [City Treasurer] 4. December Disbursements — December 2002 Accounts Payable & Payroll ■ Fiscal impact: $1,825,377.92. ■ Staff recommendation: City Council approve certified City accounts payable, payroll and payroll vendor checks for December 2002. [Administrative Services] 5. Community Redevelopment Agency Annual Report for Fiscal-Year 2001-2002 ■ Fiscal impact: None. • Staff recommendation: Council review and accept the Community Redevelopment Agency Annual Report for fiscal year 2001-2002. [City Manager] 6. Final Parcel Map 2002-0026 (Parcel Map AT 99-306) - (TPM 2000-00011 10450 Morro Road (Thomas) • Fiscal impact: None. ■ Staff recommendation: Council accept Final Parcel Map 2002-0026 (Parcel Map AT 99-306) [Public Works] 7. Final Parcel Map 2002-0041 - (Tract 2453) - [TTM 2001-0013] 2750 EI Camino Real (Gearhart/Wilson) ■ Fiscal impact: None. ■ Staff recommendations: Council: 1. Accept Final Parcel Map 2002-0041 (Tract 2453) 2. Reject offer of dedication for Public Utility Easement without prejudice to future acceptance. 3. Authorize City Manager to execute Subdivision Agreement with Kelly Gearhart. [Public Works] 3 8. Final Parcel Map 2002-0045 (Tract 2479) - [TTM 2002-0017] 3200 El Camino Real (Gearhart/Wilson) ■ Fiscal impact: None. ■ Staff recommendations: Council 1. Accept Final Parcel Map 2002-0045 (Tract 2479) 2. Reject offer of dedication for Street Purposes and Public Utility Easements without prejudice to future acceptance. 3. Authorize City Manager to execute Subdivision Agreement with Kelly Gearhart. [Public Works] 9. Zone Change 2002-0037 - Code Text Amendment of Planned Development #11 (3F Meadows Fire Protection Standards) (Castlerock Development) ■ Fiscal impact: None. ■ Staff recommendation: Council adopt, on second reading by title only, the'draft Ordinance amending the fire protection standards of Planned Development#11. [Community Development] 10. 2002-2003 Annual Overlay Program Bid No. 2002-007 ■ Fiscal impact: $$6,000 • Staff recommendation: Council 1. Authorize Contract Change Order for$6,000 to Pavement.Engineering, Inc. for Inspection services. 2. Authorize Final Payment to Pavement Engineering, Inc. for Design and • Inspection services. [Public Works] 11. Acceptance of Proposals For Contract Plan Check Services Bid No. 2002-010 ■ Fiscal impact: Plan check contract will exceed $25,000 per year, paid by the building plan check fee collected at time of permit submittal. ■ Staff recommendation: Council establish eligibility list and award contracts for plan check services to California Code Check, Esgil Corporation, and Mike Whitaker. [Community Development] • 4 • B. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. Zone Change 2002-0031 / Conditional Use Permit 2002-0089 / Tentative Tract Map 2002-0015 (#2460) - 9105 & 9127 San Diego Road (Metering /Twin Cities Surveys) • Fiscal impact: The project would likely have a slight negative impact on City revenues. As a general rule, single-family dwellings require services that exceed the revenue generated by the dwelling. ■ Planning Commission recommendations: 1. Adopt Draft Resolution A, certifying proposed Negative Declaration 2002-0046 prepared for Zone Change 2002-0031 and Tentative Tract Map 2002-0015; and, 2. Introduce Draft Ordinance A, for first reading by title only, to approve Zone Change 2002-0031; and amend the City's Zoning Map to add a PD-16 overlay district to the project area. 3. Adopt Draft Resolution B, approving the Conditional Use Permit 2002-0089, a Master Plan of Development for the project site consistent with PD-16; and, 4. Adopt Draft Resolution C, approving Tentative Tract Map 2002-0015, a request to subdivide a 10-acre and a 4-acre lot into five parcels; three at 2.69 acres, one at 2.93 acres, and one at 3.03 acres, all acreages gross, based on findings and subject to conditions. [Community Development] C. MANAGEMENT REPORTS: 1. Mid-Year Budget Review ■ Fiscal impact: Revenue Increase $130,000, Additional Appropriations of$90,000. ■ Staff recommendation: Council adopt the attached draft Resolution amending the 2002-03 Budget. [Administrative Services] 2. Atascadero Road Program • Fiscal impact: $40,000.00 funded from Public Works Street Maintenance Operating Supplies and Contract Services accounts. $50,000 for Assessment District creation (in FY 2002-2003 budget). ■ Staff recommendations: City Council 1. Receive an updated report on the Atascadero Road Program. 2. Review the Local Road Priority List and direct staff on the spring of 2003 Local Road paving. 3. Direct Staff on the Assessment District formation process. [Public Works] D. COMMITTEE & LIAISON REPORTS: (The following represent standing committees. Informative status reports will be given, as felt necessary.): Mayor Clay 1. Water Committees 2. County Mayor's Round Table Mayor Pro Tem Luna 1 Finance Committee 2. Integrated Waste Management Authority(IWMA) 5 • Council Member Scalise 1. Atascadero State Hospital Advisory Board 2. Local Agency Formation Commissions (LAFCO) 3. S.L.O. Council of Governments(SLOCOG)/S.L.O. Regional Transit Authority(SLORTA) Council Member O'Malley 1 Finance Committee 2. City/Schools Committee 3. Air Pollution Control District(APCD) 4. Economic Vitality Corporation, Board of Directors (EVC) Council Member Pacas 1. City/Schools Committee 2. Atascadero Youth Task Force E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION: 1. City Council 2. City Clerk 3. City Treasurer 4. City Attorney 5. City Manager F. ADJOURNMENT: Please note: Should anyone challenge any proposed development entitlement listed on this Agenda in court, that person may be limited to raising those issues addressed at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at or,prior to this public hearing. Correspondence submitted at this public hearing will be distributed to the Council and available for review in the City Clerk's office. I, Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk of the City of Atascadero, declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing agenda for the February 11, 2003 Regular Session of the Atascadero City Council was posted on February 4, 2003 at Atascadero City Hall, 6500 Palma Ave., Atascadero, CA 93422 and was available for public review in the Customer Service Center at that location. Signed this 4th day of February 2003 at Atascadero, California. Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Cler City of Atascadero 6 City of Atascadero WELCOME TO THE ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL MEETING The City Council meets in regular session on the second and fourth Tuesday of each month at 7:00 p.m., in the Council Chamber of City Hall. Matters are considered by the Council in the order of the printed Agenda. Copies of the staff reports or other documentation relating to each item of business referred to on the Agenda are on file in the office of the City Clerk (Room 311) and are available for public inspection during City Hall business hours at the Central Receptionist counter and on our website, www.atascadero.ore. An agenda packet is also available for public review at the Atascadero Library, 6850 Morro Road. Contracts, Resolutions and Ordinances will be allocated a number once they are approved by the City Council. The minutes of this meeting will reflect these numbers. All documents submitted by the public during Council meetings that are either read into the record or referred to in their statement will be noted in the minutes and available for review in the City Clerk's office. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in a City meeting or other services offered by this City, please contact the City Manager's Office, (805) 461- 5010, or the City Clerk's Office, (805) 461-5074. Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time when services are needed will assist the City staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting or service. TO SPEAK ON AGENDA ITEMS Members of the audience may speak on any item on the agenda. The Mayor will identify the subject, staff will give their report, and the Council will ask questions of staff. The Mayor will announce when the public comment period is open and will request anyone interested to address the Council regarding the matter being considered to step up to the podium. If you wish to speak for, against or comment in any way: • • You must approach the podium and be recognized by the Mayor • Give your name and address(not required) • Make your statement • All comments should be made to the Mayor and Council • All comments limited to 5 minutes(unless changed by the Council) • No one may speak for a second time until everyone wishing to speak has had an opportunity to do so, and no one may speak more than twice on any item. The Mayor will announce when the public comment period is closed, and thereafter, no further public comments will be heard by the Council. TO SPEAK ON SUBJECTS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA Under Agenda item, "COMMUNITY FORUM", the Mayor will call for anyone from the audience having business with the Council to: • Please approach the podium and be recognized • Give your name and address(not required) • State the nature of your business This is the time items not on the Agenda may be brought to the Council's attention. A maximum of 30 minutes will be allowed for Community Forum(unless changed by the Council). TO HAVE ITEMS PLACED ON AGENDA • All business matters to appear on the Agenda must be in the Office of the City Manager 14 days preceding the Council meeting. Should you have a matter you wish to bring before the Council,please mail or bring a written communication to the City Manager's office in City Hall prior to the deadline. "'SPAYDAY USA" FEBRUARY25, 2003 WHEREAS, cats and dogs provide companionship and share the homes of over 63,000,000 individuals in the United States; and WHEREAS, two unaltered cats and their offspring can produce 420,000 more cats in seven years, and two unaltered dogs and their offspring can produce 67,000 more dogs in six years; and WHEREAS, humane societies and shelters euthanize approximately five million cats and dogs each year, although many of them are healthy and adoptable, simply because there are not enough good homes; and WHEREAS, the problem of companion animal overpopulation costs the taxpayers of this country billions of dollars annually through animal control programs aimed at coping with the millions of unwanted cats and dogs; and WHEREAS, spaying and neutering cats and dogs has been shown to drastically reduce cat and dog overpopulation; and WHEREAS, veterinarians, humane societies, national and local animal protection organizations, and private citizens worked together to ensure the spaying or neutering of an estimated 210,000 companion animals through "Spay Day USA"in 2002; and WHEREAS, veterinarians, humane societies, national and local animal protection organizations, and private citizens have joined together again to advocate the spaying and neutering of companion animals on "Spay Day USA 2003 .NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED by the Atascadero City Council, that February 25, 2003 is designated "Spay Day USA". The Mayor is authorized and requested to issue a proclamation calling upon the people of Atascadero to observe the day by having their own cats or dogs spayed or neutered or by sponsoring the paying or neutering of another person's cat or do . t G Jerry y, Sr., ayor City of scadero, CA February 11, 2003 ._ L n +7-9 Atascadero City Council Staff Report - City Manager's Office San Luis Obispo County Housing Trust Fund RECOMMENDATIONS: City Council: 1. Support, in concept, the development of an affordable housing trust fund and agree to work with the SLO Housing Trust Fund to develop a future dedicated revenue source, and; 2. Do not provide financial support for start up costs at this time. DISCUSSION: Overview Representatives of the San Luis Obispo County Housing Trust Fund are making presentations to all cities in the County, and to County government. They have made presentations to the Board of Supervisors, Arroyo Grande and San Luis Obispo City Councils. The mission of the Housing Trust Fund is one that we can all support: "...to increase the number of units of affordable housing for low and moderate income County residents. " The difficulty begins in determining how to go about achieving the mission. What is Being Asked of the Cities and County Initially, program advocates stated the success of the fund depends upon "...a $S million annual fund made possible through the dedication of public resources from the County along with its seven cities. " A copy of an article Trust Fund advocates published in a national newsletter outlining the proposed contributions is attached. As noted in the article, "Each jurisdiction is being asked to provide funds to the Trust Fund from their existing revenues until a permanent source of funds is identified and implemented. " The Trust Fund proposed an annual funding • level from the City of Atascadero of nearly$500,000. 602 In the original Trust Fund proposal, the potential sources of"existing revenues" include several General Fund sources (e.g. sales tax, TOT, and utility taxes), along with a number of fees, • including inclusionary housing fees. Other ideas include such things as proceeds from the sale of public lands, and a ballot measure to establish a long term funding source. Private contributions are also identified as a funding source. The Trust Fund advocates have modified their request as they have been working with the County and cities. Their current request is for the City to support the Trust Fund in concept and to work closely with the Trust Fund to secure a dedicated future funding (see the attached email from Anita Robinson). This is a broader target providing an opportunity for cities to commit in concept without pledging financial resources. The request also asks for start up funds that will be matched on a dollar for dollar basis from the County. The Conceptual Difficulties The initial proposal raised many concerns, as the Trust Fund would compete directly with other General Fund responsibilities. City Managers developed the following issues that should be considered: 1. Even in"good times", cities and the County do not have General Fund monies available to fund such new, ambitious undertaking. In addition, most cities strongly discourage earmarking General Fund monies—the only source that exists to support basic City services and unforeseen needs or emergencies; 2. We are most certainly not in"good times"; the 2003-04 budget,with potentially significant State takeaways,may leave the City in a difficult financial position; 3. Therefore, a dedicated source of new revenue is the best way to support the Trust Fund. However, this will require a ballot measure campaign,which will admittedly require a lot of hard work,while offering uncertain results; 4. In terms of non-General Fund sources,the Atascadero General Plan contemplates an "inclusionary housing fund". The question with respect to such funds shall be: What assurances would a city have that transferring funds to a new, 15 person decision-making body(with only one city representative) will result in more benefits than could be achieved"going it alone"? 5. How would all of this play-out in terms of State housing goals? Would, for example, cities get"credit" for helping to fund projects outside their city limit? Now Trust Fund advocates have refined their approach to "a future dedicated revenue source" which reduces the anxiety around the General Fund. This will be a difficult project and demand a significant effort to advance it. While the County has offered"matching funds" we do not have information regarding the issues raised above to enable staff to reach a reasonable determination of future success. The Trust Fund may be one of the tools used by Atascadero to meet its • ��3 housing goals; that is yet to be seen. We do know that we are currently working to certify the Housing Element and that it contains a variety of new programs designed to meet our housing goals. We are not in a position at this time to take advantage of the fund or participate in its development. FISCAL IMPACT: None proposed, however, the establishment of the fund could lead to a significant fiscal impact and any contribution to start up cost would need to be diverted from General Fund Reserves. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Housing Article 2. Email from Anita Robinson, Chairperson of the SLO Co. Housing Trust Fund • 004 au s1 n c *n Son Luis Ohizpmv --Couni'y Proposes Regional Housing Trust Fund Ti e San Luis Obispo Hous- All housing developed ng Consortium has through the Trust { - brought together a broad Fund will be neighbor- community base to propose and ad- hood appropriate and vocate for a housing trust fund to ad- meet all local building `' � dress housing needs throughout the codes and ordinances. County and its seven cities.For nearly The Fund will support two years,the consortium has worked such activities as: con- carefully to craft a proposal that in- struction of new units; , wolves all elements of the County, rehabilitation of exist- •o,I S po.. o OUSNr bringing the cities and county to- ing buildings; acquisi- TRUST � gether to work on housing issues,and tion of land for afford- Affordable housing provided in north San Luis Obispo County by educating the community at-large able housing develop- People's Self Help Housing.Source:Housing Consortium. about the widespread housing needs that exist in this rapidly growing Consortium;the low-income com- county of California central coast. San LUIS Obispo's median home munity; the disabled community; price of$285,000 is affordable to the construction or homebuilding San Luis Obispo's median home price only 22'c of the county's residents. industry; the business or agricul- of$285,000 is affordable to only 22% tural industry; the banking or eco- of the county's residents.A report by nomic development industry; and the Economic Advisory Committee ment;conversion of non-residential tourism.The Commission will de- to-the Board of Supervisors in the to residential use; assistance to en- termine eligibility guidelines, re- summer of 2001 expressed concern able low income households to own view and select proposed projects, • that"...the lack of housing for locally their own homes; assistance to en- assess need, provide oversight, re- employed persons could undermine able families to obtain rental hous- port on the activities and progress the county's economic viability."The ing; and other activities. Sixty per- of the Fund,and make all decisions City of Paso Robles provides one ex- cent of the funds will support de- regarding use of Housing Trust ample of the County's housing velopment of housing for families Fund revenue. crunch: a family earning the city's and individuals that have incomes median income of approximately up to 120% of the county median it is estimated that the proposed fund $47,000 a year would qualify to buy a income ($60,000 for a family of could support 600-1 000 additional $150,000 home with 10% down. four).Forty percent of the funds will ' However, the City's median-priced be used to provide housing to per- UnItS within the first file years. home costs $221,000. This story is sons with special needs. It is esti- repeated throughout the County. mated that the proposed fund could One of the most innovative aspects support 600-1,000 additional units of this proposal is the plan to gain The Consortium believes one way within the first five years. cooperation from the County and to help address the critical need for its seven cities. There are several affordable homes throughout the The proposed housing trust fund benefits to a Countywide Housing County is the creation of a housing will be incorporated as a 501(c)(3) Trust Fund. These include: by trust fund.They are proposing a$5 nonprofit corporation governed by combining revenues from indi- million annual fund made possible a Commission representing various vidual cities, sufficient revenues through the dedication of public segments of the county, including: can be generated to develop resources from the County along participating jurisdictions, the San needed housing; the countywide • with its seven cities. Luis Obispo Supportive Housing fund will be able to better lever- 4 G5 i age additional public and private The San Luis Obispo Supportive funds; and the fund will enable Housing Consortium has twenty San Luis Obispo long range planning to address member agencies and has created Supportive • existing needs and innovative a Leadership Team with represen- Consortium Member projects appropriate to neighbor- hoods throughout the county. Agencies A sharing formula has been i A sharing formula has been devel- developed that ties the jobs and Affordable Homes, Inc. oped that ties the jobs and hous- housing imbalance that exists in AIDS Support Network Alliance for the Mentally III ing imbalance that exists in each each of the seven jurisdictions and Casa Solana of the seven jurisdictions and the Behavioral Health Services County. Each jurisdiction is being the County. ) g' Department of Social Services asked to provide funds to the Economic Opportunity Commission of Housing Trust Fund from their tatives from key segments of theS.L.O. County existing revenues until a perma- community to help direct the cam- , Housing Authority of City of S.L.O. nent source of funds is identified paign.The proposal will go before Independent living Resource Center Life Steps Foundation and implemented. The attached the County Board of Supervisors Loaves&Fishes of Paso Robles chart outlines the proposed con- early in 2002 and will then be pre- National Alliance for the Mentally III, tributions. Potential sources of sented to several cities within the S.L.O. Count' revenue include: a portion of ex- County. The thoughtful construc- North County Women's Shelter isting sales tax revenues; a portion tion of this housing trust fund pro- &Resource Center of existing real estate transfer tax posal promises to be a model for of revenues; a portion of existing city/county housing trust funds People's Self Help Housing Corporation S.L.O. Non-Profit Housing Corporation transit occupancy g p nc tax p y revenues; throughout the country. 1 Sojourn and. existingfees collected through_ Transitions-Mental Health Association developer agreements and Contact: Rachel Richardson, AIDS Support Women's Shelter Program of S.L.O. inclusionary zoning requirements; Network, P.O. Box 12158, San Luis Obispo, i Work Training Center among others. CA 93406,(805-781-3660) 1999 Housing Jobs/Housing Proposed Jurisdiction Population 1999 Jobs Units Ratio Contributions Arroyo Grande 15,848 7,490 6,641 1.1278 $386,058 Atascadero 25,215 5,980 9,603 0.6227 $483,196 Paso Robles 22,275 10,890 8,767 1.2422 $550,621 Grover Beach 12,520 2,680 5,370 0.4991 $233,537 Morro Bay 9,775 3,080 6,037 0.5102 $204,132 Pismo Beach 8,397 2,960 5,026 0.5889 $182,290 San Luis Obispo 42,446 32,090 18,776 1.7091 - $1,299,500 SLO County 102,843 10,340- 139,685 0.2606 $1,660,665 • TOTAL 239,319 75,510 . .,99,905 0.7558 $51000,000 v �� Page 1 of 1 Wade Mckinney From: Anita M. Robinson [anita@missioncommunitybank.com] • Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 12:10 PM To: Wade Mckinney Subject: Presentation to City Council February 11, 2003 Wade: Thank you for your assistance in setting up a presentation and request for support before the Atascadero City Council on the evening of February 11, 2003. The SLO Housing Trust Fund is requesting that we be allowed to make a short power-point informational presentation to the Council, followed by a request for support of the SLO Housing Trust Fund in concept, futher a commitment to work closely with the Trust Fund to develop �future dedicated revenue source for the benefit of providing affordable housing in the community, via the SLO Housing Trust Fund. Additionally, we are requesting a small monetary support which will be "matching funds" for the commitment by the SLO County Board of Supervisors (December 10, 2002). The County has pledged up to $225,000 in funding for start up costs,to be matched $1 or$1 by other monies from the 7 cities and other sources. We are open to your suggestion as to what amount that might be, in advance, and hope that the City of Atascadero will be a participant in the development of the SLO Housing Trust Fund as a "pilot project" by the Cities and County. Please feel free to call me with any you may have regardingardin this request. I look forward to • talking with you and to seeing you on February 11, 2003. Sincerely, Anita M. Robinson Chair SLO Housing Trust Fund • 2/4/2003 lJvf ITEM NUMBER: A-1 DATE: 02/11/2003 nE: Big' B W 1a d �. CITY OF A TASCADERO CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES TUESDAY, January 14, 2003 7:00 P.M. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: 6:00 P.M. COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION: (Immediately following Redevelopment Agency Meeting) • 1. PUBLIC COMMENT - CLOSED SESSION Mayor Pro Tem Luna announced that because of his strong feelings regarding the General Plan he would not participate in the Environmental Center of SLO v. City of Atascadero discussion. Council Member O'Malley stated that he owns property within 500 feet of the bowling alley property and would therefore be stepping down from consideration of Creekside Associates v. City of Atascadero. Mayor Clay announced that the order of the Closed Session Items would be reversed. 2. Call to Order a) Conference with legal counsel - Existing litigation (Govt. Code Sec. 54956.9 (a)) 1. Environmental Center of SLO v. City of Atascadero 2. Creekside Associates v. City of Atascadero 3. Bergdorff v. City of Atascadero 3. Adjourn 4. CLOSED SESSION REPORT CC 01/14/03 Page 1 ITEM NUMBER: A- 1 DATE: 02/11/2003 City Attorney Roy Hanley announced there was no reportable action taken. • REGULAR SESSION: Mayor Clay called the meeting to order at 7:03 p.m. and Council Member O'Malley led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL: Present: Council Members Scalise, O'Malley, Pacas, Luna and Mayor Clay Absent: None Others Present: City Clerk Marcia McClure Torgerson and City Treasurer Joseph Modica. Staff Present: City Manager Wade McKinney, Assistant City Manager Brady Cherry, Community Development Director Warren Frace, Public Works Director Steve Kahn, Information Technology Director Andrew Fruin, Deputy Community Services Director Geoff English, Redevelopment Specialist John Jansons, Police Chief Dennis Hegwood, Fire Chief Kurt Stone and City Attorney Roy Hanley. • INTRODUCTIONS: City Manager Wade McKinney presented Fire Captain Tom Way with his 15-year service pin. Police Chief Dennis Hegwood introduced to the Council new Police Officer Thomas Gandy. Fire Chief Kurt Stone introduced Scott Hallett, who was recently promoted to Fire Captain. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: MOTION: By Mayor Pro Tem Luna and seconded by Council Member O'Malley to approve the agenda. Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. COMMUNITY FORUM Joan O'Keefe, 9985 Old Morro Road East, expressed a complaint concerning Castlerock Development's treatment of City staff. Also, she made a complaint about the • way the Planning Commission conducted itself during their last meeting. She submitted her comments in writing. (Exhibit A) CC 01/14/03 (�.�1 f� Page 2 v V 9 ITEM NUMBER: A- 1 DATE: 02/11/2003 • Richard Moen, Portola Road, suggested the Council consider having ordinances prohibiting solicitation, controlling noise, and improving traffic. Mayor Clay closed the Community Forum period. Mayor Clay asked the City Attorney to address Brown Act violations. Mr. Hanley responded that he is prepared to make a presentation to a Joint Meeting of the City Council and Commissions concerning the Brown Act. Mayor Pro Tem Luna asked the City Attorney to review the proposed ordinances mentioned by Mr. Moen. Mr. Hanley explained the City does not have a panhandling ordinance, and the City cannot just forbid it as it would infringe on individuals free speech, but there are ways to deal with aggressive panhandling. There is an ordinance that prohibits vehicles from being used as residences and it has been consistently enforced in the past. Regarding dirt bikes, there are inconsistencies in the City Code regarding noise regulations, and it is hoped that this issue can be discussed at the strategic planning session. Mayor Clay requested Public Works Director Steve Kahn give a report on the overpass study. Mr. Kahn stated that the one interchange that will be under construction in the future would be 101/41; however there are problems at many interchanges and a study is underway along the entire EI Camino Real/101 corridor. • COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS: Mayor Pro Tem Luna read Section 24.18 Relations to Council and the City Manager. Council Member Pacas announced that she, Council Member O'Malley, Mayor Clay and City Manager Wade McKinney went to Sacramento to attend a League conference, which she found to be informative, and she was able to attend the State of the State Address. Mayor Clay announced his appointments of Council Members to various committees. (Exhibit B) A. CONSENT CALENDAR: 1. City Council Minutes —December 10, 2002 • City Clerk recommendation: City Council approve the City Council minutes of December 10, 2002. [City Clerk] • 2. City Treasurer's Report— October 2002 ■ Fiscal impact: None ■ City Treasurer recommendation: City Council approve the City Treasurer's report for October 2002. [City Treasurer] CC 01/14/03 Page 3 L Q ITEM NUMBER: A- 1 DATE: 02/11/2003 3. City Treasurer's Report— November 2002 • ■ Fiscal impact: None ■ City Treasurer recommendation: City Council approve the City Treasurer's report for November 2002. [City Treasurer] 4. November Disbursements — November 2002 Accounts Payable & Payroll • Fiscal impact: $1,703,693.31. • Staff recommendation: City Council approve certified City accounts payable, payroll and payroll vendor checks for November 2002. [Administrative Services] 5. Zone Change 2002-0029 - 2000 Ferrocarril Road (Kelly Gearhart/ Wilson Land Surveys) • Fiscal impact: The project would likely have a slight negative impact on City revenues. As a general rule, single-family dwellings require services that exceed the revenue generated by the dwelling. ■ Staff recommendation: City Council introduce for second reading by title only, and adopt the draft Ordinance, enacting Zone Change 2002-0029, changing the zoning district of the subject site from RS—P to RS/PD-16. [Community Development] 6. Request to Serve Alcoholic Beverages in the Rotunda Room - Atascadero Main Street ■ Fiscal impact: None. Main Street will cover all security costs related to this event. ■ Staff recommendation: Council approve a request by the Atascadero Main Street Association to serve alcoholic beverages in the Rotunda Room of the City • Administration building on January 30, 2003. [Community Services] 7. Final Parcel Map 2002-0040 ATAL 01-476 [LLA 2001-00341 - 7955 San Andres Ave (Burbach) ■ Fiscal impact: None. ■ Staff recommendation: Council: 1. Accept Final Parcel Map 2002-0040 (ATAL 01-476) 2. Accept offer of dedication for Public Sewer Easement. 3. Reject offer of dedication for Public Drainage Easement without prejudice to future acceptance. [Public Works] 8. Consultant Services Agreement - Public Works Inspection ■ Fiscal impact: None. ■ Staff recommendation: Council approve the Consultant Services Agreement with Ann Hall for Public Works Inspection. [Public Works] Council Member Pacas pulled Item #A-1, Mayor Pro Tem Luna pulled Item #A-5. MOTION: By Mayor Pro Tem Luna and seconded by Council Member O'Malley to approve Items #A-2, 3, 4, 6, 7 and 8. Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. (Item #A-8 Contract No. 2003-001) • CC 01/14/03 s Page tv4� ITEM NUMBER: A- 1 DATE: 02/11/2003 • Item #A-1: Council Member Pacas asked Mayor Pro Tem Luna to review his comments on page 9 of the Minutes and clarify his statement. She stated that she remembered him saying that he wished ANTA would take up this entrepreneurial spirit in seeking open space for the City. City Clerk Torgerson stated that she would listen to the tape and put down what Mayor Pro Tem Luna had said. MOTION: By Council Member Pacas and seconded by Council Member O'Malley to approve the Minutes with the correction to be made by the City Clerk. Motion passed 5:0 by a voice vote. Item #A-5: Mayor Pro Tem Luna indicated that the Minutes of December 10, 2002 did not give the reason why he voted no on this item and he wanted to clarify this. Mayor Pro Tem Luna stated that at this time there is no water on that property and whether it is to be annexed to the Atascadero Mutual Water Company service area or have wells, there needs to be proof that these two options are feasible before the project is considered by either the Planning Commission or the City Council. Community Development Director Frace stated that this project was conditioned with two options: 1) Annexation to the Atascadero Mutual Water Company service area, and the applicant is working with the Water Company on the technical studies to facilitate the annexation, and 2) the lots could be served by individual wells and there is a process by which the City Engineer must approve each well on a lot-by-lot basis to insure that the quantity and quality of the water would meet City standards. MOTION: By Council Member Scalise and seconded by Council Member O'Malley to approve Item #A-5. Motion passed 3:2 by a roll-call vote. (Pacas and Luna opposed) B. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. Zone Change 2002-0037 Code Text Amendment of Planned Development #11 — (3F Meadows Fire Protection Standards) (Castlerock Development) ■ Fiscal impact: None. ■ Planning Commission recommendation: City Council introduce for first reading, by title only, draft Ordinance amending the fire protection standards of Planned Development#11. [Community Development] Community Development Director Warren Frace gave the staff report. Fire Chief Kurt Stone and Mr. Frace answered questions of Council • PUBLIC COMMENT— None CC 01/14/03 Page 5 u 1 2 ITEM NUMBER: A-1 DATE: 02/11/2003 MOTION: By Council Member Scalise and seconded by Mayor Clay to • introduce for first reading by title only, the draft Ordinance amending the fire protection standards of Planned Development#11. Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. Mayor Clay announced that J.D. Main missed the Community Forum portion 'of the meeting and has asked to speak now. J.D. Main spoke concerning the motel voucher program. C. MANAGEMENT REPORTS: 1. Policy Issues Regarding Homeless Shelter Locations ■ Fiscal impact: None. • Staff recommendation: City Council: 1. Direct City Staff to require adequate information as described in the report to be included in a Conditional Use Permit application to fully evaluate any proposed location; and, 2. Request the Economic Opportunity Commission to conduct neighborhood meetings and engage the community in the project. [City Manager] Assistant City Manager / Community Services Director Brady Cherry gave the staff report and answered questions of Council PUBLIC COMMENT Lillian Judd, Director of Planning and Program Development for the Economic Opportunity Commission (EOC), explained in detail EOC's efforts to locate in the North County. She also answered questions of the Council. Steve McGraw, Economic Opportunity Commission, spoke about his visit to a pilot project set up by the Head Start branch in the mid-1990's where a Head Start Center was co-located with an overnight shelter. J.D. Main, Homeless Housing Project, spoke about key issues he feels should be considered: 1) Length of time people will stay in the shelter, 2) programs to help people avoid homelessness, and 3) use of transitional housing. He feels there could be one shelter for the North County large enough to accommodate the needs of the homeless in conjunction with transitional housing. Joan O'Keefe stated that it would be nice to have a shelter in each city, but that is not possible because of a lack of funds. She expressed her support for the location of this proposal. • CC 01/14/03 Page 6 G13 ITEM NUMBER: A-1 DATE: 02/11/2003 • Lon Allan, 6815 Santa Lucia, referred to the Baptist Church and the old County Hospital, and asked if the shelter site has been decided or if other sites are still under consideration. Mayor Clay closed the Public Comment period. Mayor Clay indicated that he would like to have a condition added that there be a collaborative effort with financial support from the County and City of Paso Robles if Atascadero takes this project on. MOTION: By Council Member O'Malley and seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Luna to adopt staff recommendations 1 and 2. Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. Mayor Clay recessed the hearing at 9:40 p.m. Mayor Clay called the meeting back to order at 9:50 p.m. 2. Information Bulletin a. CalTrans Signs Downtown • Public Works Director Steve Kahn informed Council that Cal Trans has begun to install warning signs for interchange overhead crossings throughout the State of California and are currently working in Atascadero. Staff is concerned about two signs on EI Camino Real and will be meeting with Cal Trans on Thursday morning to discuss the locations for those signs. b. City Council Strategic Planning Workshop City Manager Wade McKinney asked Council to review the list of items for the workshop and add any items they feel should be addressed. Mr. McKinney also spoke about department presentations, which are continuing tonight and of financial impacts to the City in light of the economy, PERS and the State budget cuts. Council Members indicated the following items as areas to be addressed in the Strategic Planning Workshop: 1) Commission Norms, 2) Council Norms and Shared Values, 3) Council self-policing, and 4) Budget policy. PUBLIC COMMENT • Joan O'Keefe requested the Council discuss the budget at a time when the public will be able to attend. CC 01/14/03 Page 7 U 1 L! ITEM NUMBER: A-1 DATE: 02/11/2003 Mayor Clay closed the Public Comment period. • c. Police Recruit Program [City Manager] Dennis Hegwood reported on the recruitment program and would like to move forward with the understanding that recruits would be hired at reduced rates while meeting the requirements mentioned in the staff report. Department Presentations Community Development Director Warren Frace, Public Works Director Steve Kahn, Police Chief Dennis Hegwood, Fire Chief Kurt Stone, and Information Technology Director Andrew Fruin gave presentations to the Council on their Departments. D. COMMITTEE REPORTS: Integrated Waste Management Authority (IWMA): Mayor Pro Tem Luna reported they are going forward with the IWMA becoming the local enforcement agency. It will be necessary to hire an environmental resource specialist. S.L.O. Council of Governments (SLOCOG)/S.L.O. Regional Transit Authority • (SLORTA): Council Member Scalise reported that SLOCOG met and wrapped up the HCD allocations for the County and that the 41 interchange is a fully funded project. E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION: City Council Council Member O'Malley stated that Main Street Executive Director Jonelle Norton has asked for a Council representative to sit officially on the Main Street Board of Directors. City Manager City Manager McKinney reported that the Strategic Plan Workshop would be held in place of the next City Council meeting, so there will not be a Council meeting until February. F. ADJOURNMENT: Mayor Clay adjourned the meeting at 10:22 p.m. CC 01/14/03 Page8J ITEM NUMBER: A-1 DATE: 02/11/2003 • MEETING RECORDED AND MINUTES PREPARED BY: Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk The following exhibits are available for review in the City Clerk's office. Exhibit A — Prepared statement, Joan O'Keefe Exhibit 8 -Committee and Liaison Assignments, Mayor Clay • CC 01/14/03 ' ' Page 9 ITEM NUMBER: A-2 DATE: 02/11/2003 SPECIAL MEETING ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, January 28, 2003, 3:00 p.m. Wednesday, January 29, 2003, 8:30 a.m. xx�*�'c��c�x�x�Fxxx�xx��x���x�Fxxxxx9c�'e�Fx�x Strategic Planning Workshop TUESDAY,JANUARY 28,2003,3:00 P.M. Mayor Clay called the meeting to order at 3:10 p.m. and announced that all Council Members were present: Council Members Luna,O'Malley,Pacas, Scalise,and Mayor Clay. Also present were City Manager Wade McKinney and City Attorney Roy Hanley. COMMUNITY FORUM: Mary Jo Wallace expressed her support for prayer at Council meetings. • Mayor Clay closed the Community Forum period COUNCIL WORKSHOP—STRATEGIC PLANNING Dr. Bill Mathis introduced himself and explained the agenda for the workshop. The Council then initiated the workshop. The Council recessed at 5`.30 p.m.for dinner and resumed the workshop at 6:30 p.m. ADJOURNMENT: Mayor Clay adjourned the workshop at 9:00 p.m. to be continued on Wednesday, January 29,2003 at 8:30 a.m. WFDNF,SDAY,JANUARY 29,2003,8:30 A.M. Mayor Clay called the workshop to order at 8:40 a.m. and announced that all Council Members were present: Council Members Luna, O'Malley, Pacas, Scalise, and Mayor Clay. Also present were City Manager Wade McKinney and City Attorney Roy Hanley. COUNCII.WORKSHOP—STRATEGIC PLANNING Dr.Mathis continued the Strategic Planning workshop with the Council. V � P6 ITEM NUMBER: A-3 DATE: 02 L 1 2003 n rats iee i City Treasurer's Report December 2002 Joseph Modica, Jr. RECOMMENDATION: City Council approve the City Treasurer's report for December 2002 REPORT IN BRIEF: Cash and Investments Checking $ 1,022,371 Money Market Accounts 434 Certificates of Deposit 5,633,882 Government Securities 1,249,031 • Corporate Paper _ LAIF 14,144,970 Cash with Fiscal Agents 143,500 Cash in Banks at December 31,2002 $ 22,194,188 Deposits in Transit Outstanding Checks (716,071) Cash and Investments at December 31,2002 $ 21,478,117 Investment Activity Securities Purchased: None Securities Matured: None Securities Sold/Called Prior to Maturity: None Other Reportable Activities: None • Pagel of 11 CITY OF ATASCADERO TREASURER'S REPORT CASH&INVESTMENTS ACTIVITYSUMMARY • FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER 2002 CHECKING FISCAL ACCOUNT INVESTMENTS AGENT TOTALS Balance per Banks at December 1, 2002 $ 199,913 $ 20,067,919 $ 143,382 $ 20,411,214 Receipts 3,119,832 398 118 3,120,348 Disbursements (1,337,374) - - (1,337,374) Transfers In 200,000 1,160,000 1,360,000 Transfers Out (1,160,000) (200,000) - (1,360,000) Balance per Banks at December 31,2002 $ 1,022,371 $ 21,028,317 $ 143,500 22,194,188 Deposits in Transit - • Outstanding Checks (716,071) Adjusted Treasurer's Balance $ 21,478,117 • 020 Page 2 of 11 Q V1j 00 v ` h Z CO O M O E� C: 7 r1 N v1 O O O O O O O O O W W r - v vi v; v v o0 0o v a o a o\ CT O\ D\ O\ D\ T a\ Q\ O Q\ j 69 O K h O O O N O OO O O r O O O O O O O Z Q\ V M O O O -- O M C O O O O 7 V C, a, Cl� C, Q\of Q\ Q\Ln L 7 V b9 F 'L ol � j v D o v v o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O MM S o 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 a v M o 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 C 0 0 C, v a O` U j It v rn a a C, a rn a o\ e e e e e e a e a o e e e OElti N ; O a O_ h O O N h vii 7 `v in C O LQ cs 10 -If -V N Q W.N �+ o v, o 0 O o V ot: \ V \ � � O O N td ftl td O tC N N eG e3 Rf ed A td v = r F. �? 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W w w w w w w w w w w w w w w 'b o o O O o 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 W > w a a a c ro c m 1 t z z z r E r t x r c t v y `y y U U U U U U U U U U U U U U o o a - o Q W� o 0 0 0 a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 QC 4' Q O O O O O O O O O O O O 4 c Y o U O a Y c U M z CC � V W O O a C Y q v W Vl z Z Z G1 R1 � m 0 0.1 w E •S.0 eca 0- z • o _ o — @ C 0 Q 9 d =� c 3 3 y a Q 'G c o a c o a U > e G o V c cc y° i 8 °a _° o q .Ld U d o a 7 `o E = 0 c 0 '` -0 aw oa �n ¢ aH 33 UCn 3 mW z � c4m aw 'wH wx uu as wc� d I tl In O M M M M M O Yl M 00 M 7 N N Vl VlIn O O ^ N N O7 O ^. G S! N N M 7 Vt Vl r- r 00 W O� T O� i O O O O O O O O O O O O O ^ ^O> 4 C0 2 10 Ly y N r W Or Or N O r O C w W Z r O O � O O r b O O 00 00 00 O N O w T D\ r I, h n o• � n o0 oo C, n n oo h t� V ea 0 o O 10 0 0 0 o w o O Z oo po 00 00 O p o vl p O O O O N O O O O O O p O O O 'n O O O' O r O p O o` o\ b vi h r vi T of cn rn O 2 . 64 N � \td tC eG C etl ed ed \N N N \N N N tC eG N 4 y A 0 o p o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 o O 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o So 0 0 0 0 0 C C C C C 0 0 C 0 a S, a r- vi - o, t- r r' t- o, e 'n o, o+ a of a o. of a a, a\ o+ o, C, .r a � V �L ss O e o o e e e e e o e 0 0 o e e e V o o 'n o vi 'n 'n v-, 'n o 'n o O E� ti o 'n v, 'n r �o v v, v, r �o �0 0 0 0 0 'n o 0 N A w N cq Cy I. e o o e e o o e e e o e e o o e Ir o '^ 'n 'n 'n 'n 'n 'n o 'n O o 0 0 vi V; u Z a m a a a a a a a a a a a a a u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u W� 4 q A A q A A A q q O q q q A A A W w w w w w w w w w w w w '« 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u u u u u u u u u u u u u W G W W er w w^ t= r C •C •C •Y •z •r •C •X K .K u U U U U U U U U U U U U U Q Ly N N N N N O O O F N r r .-. r h M b O O O- O aQ O O O O O 00 O O O Cl O .r .. 4 cl 0 m F I C F a m •e 6 Pd eca dJ Al, W °� a c Y 14 c e a, U Pa cel •o14 A W Q z 3 N Q e Q Y _ `o O cl C7 O o7 i co c o co ro o O ai C (� °a Aeqq Z W Y n L i ° 'C en eq „" G e b W Ci C4 „' u 'i d d U •� C 'R„ CC .� E e e w o Z N a d G 3c� d 0 3 b A? $ a' d n^" s o c s A a a m �' A a m s a A o c u W C7 con- CC v� ;z W O W A > cn C7 Gq < U W W U lz Q F C7 W d A U A cn a [y c o 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 c o 0 0 N T ct C O ... O O O O O O O O O O p OF-Cy w � 'n 00 N , ' O M Vl N �D DD •.,, 4 ` W Z • �n -- o 0 0 o M v. o0 0 cc oo fy [� W C 0 o v li v o a M W N 00 O V V 1- n r V l- 00 C\ h N 00 00 O\ O\ O\ P ai N N ti 'C fA Z p O O O O O b O O O O O O O O O o0 O p O O O O O O O O O O O O O �D ..-• Vl vl l� i� � � r r C.�• v) fT a` G1 Ln � � N Nf v Q O O O O O pO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O r O\ n n n O\ V1 O C\ O\ O\ O\ C, O\ O` C` N C, Q\ � J ^ 00 R j 0 M N h N N 1� N N N M 000 O r O W C e{ 00 M M M M M 7 M et M V M N A w N F a e e o 0 o e e e e e \ o o e [� o O O o h o o o vi � i Q\ h N N n h N Cl! N M W 0 y Q � U 01 [� V ti 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 o o •o o •o Z a a a a a a a a a a a a � a u q A A A A Q A q A Q q A u A A W W W W W W W W W W W W N O O O O O O O O O O C O O Mo F. of ee N ce eq to Rt N Rf N R N > X Z r C C L r L > t: w^ o u u u d v v u u u u v o u C7 U U U U U U U U U U U U C7 U U - fr �O v1 vl O T O � -+ .• I� � O r V LL' A �O NM O n O O n r � O O 0 O O 0 O O �--� --• O O p O O 4 a L � L � o U C c � � a ea c V r 7 zie L < Y W A as ce p i a ie u U E ;c e A :: z c is .4 w u a W o a ob Z d U o ? u ai y U ed " ai R c u po, Q A x 771R m o w o z v o o to in F Z ¢ i o fl d c `� E E u A > 3 aL, .a a Z eoo '.� u Q `° u c `n q cue 3 O A `9 a0� .F y a°'i °' y ° c o 6 .c v A u wv� Da ►� w U zz aw aa. Q0 3Q �., � � o, u wU ww- 0 -1 a w o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i A Eli N O v .C... M w � u j V vi Q\ r ^ •• .�(�' ►� D\ Q\ ,n h vt Q\ Q\ 0\ Q\ P Q` C` Q\ Q` a D` ai y N N N 69 O pO o0 O O O O pp O pO O O O O O O S vpi O O O O O O O O O O O O LL w a O` 01 O vl ,!1 h Cly [� D` h n � O` r O N N N O Qt Q\ a, O\ O � ti ss g A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ p o O o 0 0 0 O o C C 0 C C C C C C C C 0 0 W j a a o 0 o a a a a or+ a a a a a (J V N N N Q fA q e e e e e o o e e e o 0 0 O v1 O O O O p e e e yp44 j � C N A w N V 6 M 1614 O o a o o a a o e a o o a e o o e �y o N o h o n o 0 0 0 0 0 h V ti ti ro a d a a h 2�a ti a u °n a c a a $ 0 0 0 U V U U V N U V U U U V y0.j y W q q N u U A A A A A A A A A A A w w w w w w w w w O O O C C O O O O O O O O O O O W id ctl U E er w 0 v 0 w w w w w lu U U C7 C7 C7 U U U U U U U U U U U � N N N N N N N N N N N N N ry ry ry O O O O O O CD ^ O ti b N M CD-. Nl v) 00 00 a0 W D` GT O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 4 a o � F u A u m q ,°a N N C7 o ea a oa y E ea o a ° a ° e c o �G ma ° o A Y y o ea C = 0 0 U x Vw o c Ra E z14 �n O °� c el 0 M o i s o f a u az+ Y d a x o 9 z > a o°o c u a ami a r w o i s cl a c i i u o c E Da U .a wU ;zu wU zcn F =0 inU Oma; z w3 •w � Cau QE° UU b b r r r n r r r n r r r o 0 0 ►� E` V O O .N-, \ O N \ O O [veVVl O O C, n N m V1 ap W 00 00 O� 0` a \ M ^• M �C O ^ O O O O_ O O O O O O O O f ti 1 u a N ` W GO a � W O a, T N ^ �V r N N Z O O M tP'i h '00 F E�•. vJ vJ N N O � O N \ y j z Z Z C4 N ) cl w O CD N V y C\ O 69 69 Vi � o O � > O o •c c A � cn q w p a� CD rj 3 C d o x H °° d �. 4 Q z W s ro w F U N O O 7 y N y N VI FW W A A a i o a O O CJ �`�^^ j h 2 Y w � o Cd s r r to y c U U F � •3 "� �b Y 0 0 U 4 U C Q y G Q cls N .ti � r a N r a ej u o c w • y o y 3 c o v cs r dC (. Y v a � � to •c y F u u a ^ t Q 3 U City of Atascadero Investments by Type December 2002 • Gov't Certificates Securities Other Cash with of Deposit 6% 0% Fiscal Agent 27% x \, 1 VN LAIF 66% Investment December 2002 LAIF $ 14,144,970 Certificates of Deposit 5,633,882 Government Securities 1,249,031 Corporate Paper - Cash with Fiscal Agent 143,500 Other 434 $ 21,1714817 Page 8 of 11 'T &,r..6 City of Atascadero Investments by Maturity • December 2002 One to Five Years One Month 24% to One Year Within 8% One Month 0% • On Demand 68% Investment December 2002 On Demand $ 14,145,404 Within One Month 47,335 One Month to One Year 1,733,947 One to Five Years 5,101,632 $ 21,028,317 Page 9 of 11 City of Atascadero Investments by Custodial Agent December 2002 • Bank of RBC Dain Rauscher 23% New York 1% City of Atascadero 0% Penson Financial Corp 9% 3 • State of California 67% Custodial Agent December 2002 State of California $ 14,144,970 Penson Financial Corp. 1,898,725 RBC Dain Rauscher 4,937,287 Riverway Trust - Bank of New York 143,500 City of Atascadero 47,335 $ 21,171,817 • Page 10 of 11 4 City of Atascadero Investment Yield vs. 2-Year Treasury Yield . For the Year Ended December 31, 2002 4.00% 3.50% I 3.00% 2.50% I i 2.00% 1.50% 1.00% 0.50% 0.00% K`v 59 O O O O O O O O O O O O O ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti � e -0-City Yield 2-Yr Treasury Yield 2-Yr Treasury City Yield Yield December 2001 3.66% 3.11% January 2002 3.52% 3.03% February 2002 3.50% 3.02% March 2002 3.45% 3.56% April 2002 3.33% 3.42% May 2002 3.23% 3.26% June 2002 3.18% 2.99% July 2002 3.13% 2.56% August 2002 3.08% 2.13% September 2002 3.13% 2.00% October 2002 3.09% 1.91% November 2002 2.99% 1.92% December 2002 2.89% 1.84% Page 11 of 11 - �: ITEM NUMBER: A-4 HATE: 2/11/2003 1918 % 1979 \ CAD�xoi/ Atascadero City Council Staff Report- Administrative Services Department DECEMBER 2002 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE & PAYROLL RECOMMENDATION Approve certified City accounts payable, payroll and payroll vendor checks for December 2002. DISCUSSION Attached for City Council review and approval are the following: Payroll Dated 12/5/02 Checks# 15882 - 15976 $ 110,772.97 Direct Deposits 83,391.28 Dated 12/19/02 Checks# 15977 - 16070 101,536.58 Direct Deposits 77,453.39 • Accounts Payable Dated December 1-31, 2002 Checks #87466 - 87835 &EFTs 184-186 1,452,223.70 TOTAL AMOUNT $ 1,825,377.92 FISCAL IMPACT Total expenditures for all funds is $ 1,825,377.92 CERTIFICATION The undersigned certifies that the attached demands have been released for payment and that funds are available for these demands. Rache le Rickard,Administrative Services Director Approved by the City Council at a meeting held February 11, 2003. Marcia M.Torgerson,City Clerk ATTACHMENT: December 2002 Eden Warrant Register in the amount of $ 1,452,223.70 i 030 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of December 2002 Check Check Number Date Vendor Description Amount 184 12/2/2002 MID-STATE BANK Accounts Payable Check 96.97 87466 12/4/2002 KELLY DAVIS Accounts Payable Check 41.61 87467 12/4/2002 STEVE ROBINSON DVM Accounts Payable Check 7,800.00 87468 12/4/2002 SKILLPATH SEMINARS Accounts Payable Check 99.00 87469 12/4/2002 SLO COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR Accounts Payable Check 33 784.75 87470 12/4/2002 STATE WATER RES CONTROL BOARD Accounts Payable Check 2,700.00 87471 12/4/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS Accounts Payable Check 74.46 87472 12/4/2002 VINTAGE CATERING&CAFE Accounts Payable Check 706.00 87473 12/6/2002 ATASCADERO FIRE DEPT EMP.ASSN Payroll Vendor Payment 240.00 87474 12/6/2002 ATASCADERO MID MGRS ORG UNION Payroll Vendor Payment 30.00 87475 12/6/2002 ATASCADERO POLICE OFFICERS ASN Payroll Vendor Payment 376.00 87476 12/6/2002 COUNTY-CITY EMPLOYEES CU Payroll Vendor Payment 625.00 87477 12/6/2002 EMPLOYMENT DEV DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 8,542.36 87478 12/6/2002 EMPLOYMENT DEV.DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 615.36 87479 12/6/2002 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Payroll Vendor Payment 46.98 87480 12/6/2002 FAMILY SUPPORT DIVISION Payroll Vendor Payment 369 87481 12/6/2002 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE Payroll Vendor Payment 5,972. 87482 12/6/2002 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 Payroll Vendor Payment 500.00 87483 12/6/2002 KENNEDY CLUB FITNESS Payroll Vendor Payment 79.50 87484 12/6/2002 PERS LONG TERM CARE PROGRAM Payroll Vendor Payment 32.31 87485 12/6/2002 PUBLIC EMPL RETIREMENT SYSTEM Payroll Vendor Payment 19,463.73 87486 12/6/2002 SEIU LOCAL 620 AFL-CIO Payroll Vendor Payment 570.33 87487 12/6/2002 UNITED WAY OF SLO COUNTY Payroll Vendor Payment 38.00 87488 12/6/2002 WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK Payroll Vendor Payment 699.04 87489 12/9/2002 A.B.C. Accounts Payable Check 25.00 87490 12/9/2002 CA DEPT OF FISH&GAME Accounts Payable Check 677.75 185 12/10/2002 MID-STATE BANK Payroll Vendor Payment 37 355.31 87492 12/10/2002 BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA Payroll Vendor Payment 69,223.70 87493 12/10/2002 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE CO Payroll Vendor Payment 766.26 87494 12/10/2002 COLONIAL LIFE&ACCIDENT INS. Payroll Vendor Payment 1,459.33 87495 12/10/2002 CPIC LIFE Payroll Vendor Payment 1,527.25 87496 12/10/2002 DELTA DENTAL,ATTN:ACCOUNTING Payroll Vendor Payment 7,681.44 87497 12/10/2002 EQUITABLE LIFE Payroll Vendor Payment 3480 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of December 2002 Check Check Afturnher Date Vendor Description Amount 87498 12/11/2002 UNITED STATES DEPT OF AGRICULT Accounts Payable Check7 235.00 87499 12/12/2002 JOHN ANDRADE Accounts Payable Check 150.00 87500 12/12/2002 TOM BIRKENFELD Accounts Payable Check 350.00 87501 12/12/2002 GENIE'S STEAK HOUSE Accounts Payable Check 50.00 87502 12/12/2002 NU-WAY CLEANERS Accounts Payable Check 160.00 87503 12/12/2002 MARIO RODRIGUEZ Accounts Payable Check 300.00 87504 12/13/2002 KEITH AGGSON Accounts Payable Check 92.40 87505 12/13/2002 ALBERTSONS Accounts Payable Check 32.18 87506 12/13/2002 ALTIRIS Accounts Payable Check 1,210.00 87507 12/13/2002 AMERICAN AIRLINES CARGO ACCTG Accounts Payable Check 167.87 87508 12/13/2002 AMERICAN ZOO AND AQUARIUM ASSC Accounts Payable Check 1,134.00 87509 12/13/2002 SALLY ANDREWS Accounts Payable Check 35.00 87510 12/13/2002 APPLIED TECHNOLOGY GROUP,INC. Accounts Payable Check 335.59 87511 12/13/2002 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 106.04 87512 12/13/2002 ATASCADERO COMMUNITY Accounts Payable Check 7,500.00 87513 12/13/2002 ATASCADERO FORD Accounts Payable Check 848.50 . 87515 12/13/2002 ATASCADERO MUTUAL WATER CO. Accounts Payable Check 5,161.05 87516 12/13/2002 ATASCADERO NEWS Accounts Payable Check 387.80 87517 12/13/2002 AV VIDEO MAGAZINE Accounts Payable Check 89.00 87518 12/13/2002 AVAYA INC. Accounts Payable Check 22.41 87519 12/13/2002 BANK OF NEW YORK Accounts Payable Check 2,488.50 87520 12/13/2002 JIM BATTERSBY Accounts Payable Check 100.00 87521 12/13/2002 CATHERINE BEACH Accounts Payable Check 50.00 87522 12/13/2002 BLI INTERNATIONAL Accounts Payable Check 170.52 87523 12/13/2002 BLUE RIDGE MEDICAL INC Accounts Payable Check 304.74 87524 12/13/2002 BOB'S CRANE SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 825.00 87525 12/13/2002 BOLLINGER Accounts Payable Check 200.00 87526 12/13/2002 BOUND TREE MEDICAL,LLC Accounts Payable Check 139.63 87527 12/13/2002 DALE A.BYWATER Accounts Payable Check 2,442.50 87528 12/13/2002 CACE Accounts Payable Check 40.00 87529 12/13/2002 CALIFORNIA ASSC OF ZOOS AND Accounts Payable Check 500.00 87530 12/13/2002 CALIFORNIA INTERNET CONNECTION Accounts Payable Check 309.85 87531 12/13/2002 CALIFORNIA PEACE OFFICERS ASSN Accounts Payable Check 170.00 • 87532 12/13/2002 DENNIS CAMMACK Accounts Payable Check 50.00 87533 12/13/2002 CARMEL VALLEY LODGE Accounts Payable Check 1,573.52 V4 a� City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of December 2002 Check Check Number Date Vendor Description Amount 87534 12/13/2002 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL CED Accounts Payable Check 348. 87535 12/13/2002 CELLULAR ONE Accounts Payable Check 1,320.85 87536 12/13/2002 CENTRAL COAST CASUALTY RESTOR Accounts Payable Check 6,054.52 87537 12/13/2002 CENTRAL COAST LOCK&KEY Accounts Payable Check 845.51 87538 12/13/2002 CHEM CLEAN Accounts Payable Check 16.47 87539 12/13/2002 CHEVRON Accounts Payable Check 1,225.06 87540 12/13/2002 CHICAGO GRADE LANDFILL,INC. Accounts Payable Check 74.00 87541 12/13/2002 CHIEF SUPPLY,INC. Accounts Payable Check 125.61 87542 12/13/2002 JOSEPH CHOUINARD P.E. Accounts Payable Check 5,445.00 87543 12/13/2002 CITY CLERKS ASSC OF CALIF Accounts Payable Check 120.00 87544 12/13/2002 CITY NATIONAL BANK Accounts Payable Check 25 788.75 87545 12/13/2002 JERRY L.CLAY Accounts Payable Check 75.00 87546 12/13/2002 COASTAL IMAGING SUPPLIES Accounts Payable Check 239.17 87547 12/13/2002 VINCE CONDE Accounts Payable Check 75.00 87548 12/13/2002 CIMON CORMIER Accounts Payable Check 75.00 87549 12/13/2002 COUNTRY COPY Accounts Payable Check 101.89 87550 12/13/2002 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER Accounts Payable Check 68.5 87551 12/13/2002 CUESTA COLLEGE Accounts Payable Check 132 87552 12/13/2002 DAVID M FLEISHMAN Accounts Payable Check 12.00 87553 12/13/2002 DECOU LUMBER COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 80.57 87554 12/13/2002 DIRECT SAFETY COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 72.56 87555 12/13/2002 CATHI DOCKSTADER Accounts Payable Check 50.00 87556 12/13/2002 DOOLEY ENTERPRISES INC Accounts Payable Check 2,169.67 87557 12/13/2002 ECONOMIC VITALITY CORP OF SLO Accounts Payable Check 355.00 87558 12/13/2002 ED'S FLY MEAT,INC. Accounts Payable Check 26.50 87559 12/13/2002 EL CAMINO HOMELESS ORG. Accounts Payable Check 743.75 87560 12/13/2002 ENTENMANN-ROVIN CO. Accounts Payable Check 75.89 87561 12/13/2002 EVIDENT CRIME SCENE PRODUCTS Accounts Payable Check 46.50 87562 12/13/2002 FARM SUPPLY COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 282.43 87563 12/13/2002 FGL ENVIRONMENTAL Accounts Payable Check 194.40 87564 12/13/2002 FIRST AM REAL ESTATE SOLUTIONS Accounts Payable Check 1,504.83 87565 12/13/2002 FIRSTLINE,LLC Accounts Payable Check 117.98 87566 12/13/2002 FOOD FOR LESS Accounts Payable Check 509.73 87567 12/13/2002 FRAZEE INDUSTRIES,INC. Accounts Payable Check 921.57 87568 12/13/2002 GAS COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 279 87569 12/13/2002 PETER GAW Accounts Payable Check 87 U City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of December 2002 Check Check AgKumber Date Vendor Description Amount 87570 12/13/2002 GEM AUTO PARTS Accounts Payable Check 427.62 87571 12/13/2002 MATTHEW A.GIANAS Accounts Payable Check 60.00 87572 12/13/2002 MIKE GIL Accounts Payable Check 144.00 87573 12/13/2002 CECILIA GOTTFRIED Accounts Payable Check 350.00 87574 12/13/2002 SHERRY GREEN Accounts Payable Check 50.00 87575 12/13/2002 GRISANTI HARDWARE Accounts Payable Check 33.18 87576 12/13/2002 HAINES&COMPANY,INC. Accounts Payable Check 191.11 87577 12/13/2002 HALLETT'S BACKHOE SERVICE,INC Accounts Payable Check 18 657.00 87578 12/13/2002 HANSON AGGREGATES MID-PACIFIC Accounts Payable Check 39.85 87579 12/13/2002 HART IMPRESSIONS PRINT&COPY Accounts Payable Check 474.99 87580 12/13/2002 HEISER&ASSOCIATES,INC. Accounts Payable Check 96,050.67 87581 12/13/2002 HOME DEPOT Accounts Payable Check 1,090.21 87582 12/13/2002 HON Accounts Payable Check 718.20 87583 12/13/2002 INFORMATION SERVICES DIVISION Accounts Payable Check 164.00 87584 12/13/2002 INGLIS PET HOTEL Accounts Payable Check 225.23 87585 12/13/2002 JB DEWAR INC Accounts Payable Check 361.64 87586 12/13/2002 JEM DESIGN Accounts Payable Check 100.00 87587 12/13/2002 JESPERSEN'S TIRE SERVICE,INC. Accounts Payable Check 130.49 87588 12/13/2002 K-MART Accounts Payable Check 120.00 87589 12/13/2002 STEVEN KAHN Accounts Payable Check 84.82 87590 12/13/2002 NELLIE KENNEDY Accounts Payable Check 320.00 87591 12/13/2002 KINKO'S Accounts Payable Check 1,077.27 87592 12/13/2002 KPRL 1230 AM Accounts Payable Check 275.00 87593 12/13/2002 LAIDLAW TRANSIT SERVICES,INC. - Accounts Payable Check 100.00 87594 12/13/2002 LAUTZENHISER'S STATIONARY Accounts Payable Check 124.09 87595 12/13/2002 LEE WILSON ELECTRIC CO.INC Accounts Payable Check 30 063.00 87596 12/13/2002 LIFE ASSIST,INC. Accounts Payable Check 1,271.58 87597 12/13/2002 LONGS DRUG STORES Accounts Payable Check 123.35 87598 12/13/2002 GEORGE W.LUNA Accounts Payable Check 75.00 87599 12/13/2002 MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK,INC. Accounts Payable Check 174.96 87600 12/13/2002 MAX CARE PHARMACY Accounts Payable Check 30.00 87601 12/13/2002 RICHARD J.MCCOY Accounts Payable Check 84.00 87602 12/13/2002 WADE MCKINNEY Accounts Payable Check 10.00 87603 12/13/2002 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO. Accounts Payable Check 436.33 87604 12/13/2002 SAM MCMILLAN Accounts Payable Check 45.00 C1's� City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of December 2002 Check Check Number Date Vendor Description Amount 87605 12/13/2002 MID-COAST GEOTECHNICAL,INC. Accounts Payable Check 8 837 0 87606 12/13/2002 MID-COAST MOWER&SAW Accounts Payable Check 11.57 87607 12/13/2002 MILLER'S HARDWOOD Accounts Payable Check 2,489.00 87608 12/13/2002 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE Accounts Payable Check 17.13 87609 12/13/2002 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 113.34 87610 12/13/2002 MOSS,LEVY,&HARTZHEIM Accounts Payable Check 1,000.00 87611 12/13/2002 JACOB H.MURCH Accounts Payable Check 200.00 87612 12/13/2002 NORTH COAST ENGINEERING INC. Accounts Payable Check 68 122.75 87613 12/13/2002 NORTH COUNTY GLASS Accounts Payable Check 1,035.64 87614 12/13/2002 NORTHWEST BUSINESS STAMP Accounts Payable Check 42.15 87615 12/13/2002 THOMAS P.O'MALLEY Accounts Payable Check 75.00 87616 12/13/2002 OFFICEMAX CREDIT PLAN Accounts Payable Check 259.84 87617 12/13/2002 OMNI-MEANS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 2,310.00 87618 12/13/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE Accounts Payable Check 668.58 87619 12/13/2002 OUTLET TOOL SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 214.49 87620 12/13/2002 BECKY J.PACAS Accounts Payable Check 75.00 87621 12/13/2002 PACIFIC BELL Accounts Payable Check 264.8 87628 12/13/2002 PACIFIC BELL/WORLDCOM Accounts Payable Check 2,525 87629 12/13/2002 PASO ROBLES SUPERIOR COURT Accounts Payable Check 600.00 87630 12/13/2002 PENNY MEN Accounts Payable Check 80.88 87631 12/13/2002 ELLEN PERKINS Accounts Payable Check 177.76 87632 12/13/2002 PERRY'S PARCEL SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 84.85 87633 12/13/2002 PETE JOHNSTON CHEVROLET Accounts Payable Check 1,030.51 87634 12/13/2002 PIERCE MANUFACTURING,INC. Accounts Payable Check 127.26 87635 12/13/2002 PIONEER EQUIPMENT CO. Accounts Payable Check 155.03 87636 12/13/2002 POOR RICHARD'S PRESS Accounts Payable Check 101.83 87637 12/13/2002 GRACE L.PUCCI Accounts Payable Check 142.50 87638 12/13/2002 QUILL CORPORATION Accounts Payable Check 211.94 87639 12/13/2002 RECOGNITION WORKS Accounts Payable Check 207.53 87640 12/13/2002 JOHN RICHERT Accounts Payable Check 30.62 87641 12/13/2002 STEPHANY ROEDL Accounts Payable Check 50.00 87642 12/13/2002 STEVE ROMO Accounts Payable Check 30.00 87643 12/13/2002 RRM DESIGN GROUP Accounts Payable Check '9 116.18 87644 12/13/2002 WENDY SCALISE Accounts Payable Check 75.00 87645 12/13/2002 SCMAF Accounts Payable Check 150 87646 12/13/2002 SIGN OUTLET Accounts Payable Check 4,294 Ua}� City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of December 2002 Check Check tuber Date Vendor Description Amount 87647 12/13/2002 TOM SILVA Accounts Payable Check 100.00 87648 12/13/2002 SOUZA CONSTRUCTION INC. Accounts Payable Check 166,618.38 87650 12/13/2002 STAPLES INC. Accounts Payable Check 3,419.77 87651 12/13/2002 STATE WATER RES CONTROL BOARD Accounts Payable Check 1,000.00 87652 12/13/2002 GARI STINEBAUGH Accounts Payable Check 60.00 87653 12/13/2002 SUNLIGHT JANITORIAL Accounts Payable Check 1,170.00 87654 12/13/2002 SUNSTORM CYCLERY Accounts Payable Check 235.93 87655 12/13/2002 TOWN&COUNTRY FENCING Accounts Payable Check 1,208.00 87656 12/13/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS Accounts Payable Check 181.59 87657 12/13/2002 DAVID WAINSCOTT Accounts Payable Check 30.00 87658 12/13/2002 WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION Accounts Payable Check 112.00 87659 12/13/2002 WILLIAM P.WHITE Accounts Payable Check 742.15 87660 12/13/2002 WULFING'S POLYGRAPH SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 150.00 87677 12/19/2002 FINANCE DEPARTMENT PETTY CASH Accounts Payable Check 485.86 87678 12/19/2002 PLATINUM PLUS FOR BUSINESS 1280 Accounts Payable Check 37.23 87679 12/19/2002 PLATINUM PLUS FOR BUSINESS 1298 Accounts Payable Check 1,201.57 • 87680 12/19/2002 PLATINUM PLUS FOR BUSINESS 1306 Accounts Payable Check 153.85 87681 12/19/2002 PLATINUM PLUS FOR BUSINESS 1314 Accounts Payable Check 412.15 87682 12/19/2002 PLATINUM PLUS FOR BUSINESS 1330 Accounts Payable Check 499.64 87683 12/19/2002 PLATINUM PLUS FOR BUSINESS 1348 Accounts Payable Check 340.87 87684 12/19/2002 PLATINUM PLUS FOR BUSINESS 1363 Accounts Payable Check 482.41 87685 12/19/2002 PLATINUM PLUS FOR BUSINESS 1371 Accounts Payable Check 86.11 87686 12/19/2002 PLATINUM PLUS FOR BUSINESS 1389 Accounts Payable Check 873.67 87661 12/20/2002 ATASCADERO FIRE DEPT EMP.ASSN Payroll Vendor Payment 240.00 87662 12/20/2002 ATASCADERO MID MGRS ORG UNION Payroll Vendor Payment 30.00 87663 12/20/2002 ATASCADERO POLICE OFFICERS ASN Payroll Vendor Payment 376.00 87664 12/20/2002 COUNTY-CITY EMPLOYEES CU Payroll Vendor Payment 625.00 87665 12/20/2002 EMPLOYMENT DEV DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 6,602.11 87666 12/20/2002 EMPLOYMENT DEV.DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 529.26 87667 12/20/2002 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Payroll Vendor Payment 46.98 87668 12/20/2002 FAMILY SUPPORT DIVISION Payroll Vendor Payment 369.23 87669 12/20/2002 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE Payroll Vendor Payment 6,947.99 87670 12/20/2002 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 Payroll Vendor Payment 500.00 • 87671 12/20/2002 KENNEDY CLUB FITNESS Payroll Vendor Payment 79.50 87672 12/20/2002 PERS LONG TERM CARE PROGRAM Payroll Vendor Payment Ym 32.31 &3.6 City of Ataseadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of December 2002 Check Check Number Date Vendor Description Amo 87673 12/20/2002 PUBLIC EMPL RETIREMENT SYSTEM Payroll Vendor Payment 19,251. 8 87674 12/20/2002 SEIU LOCAL 620 AFL-CIO Payroll Vendor Payment 553.66 87675 12/20/2002 UNITED WAY OF SLO COUNTY Payroll Vendor Payment 38.00 87676 12/20/2002 WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK Payroll Vendor Payment 764.22 87687 12/23/2002 ASSURITY LIFE INSURANCE CO Accounts Payable Check 175.00 87688 12/23/2002 ATTORNEY SERVICE OF SLO Accounts Payable Check 200.00 87689 12/23/2002 LAW OFFICE OF STEPHEN BECKER Accounts Payable Check 500.00 186 12/24/2002 MID-STATE BANK Payroll Vendor Payment 30,784.07 87690 12/27/2002 A-Z BUS SALES Accounts Payable Check 50 199.42 87691 12/27/2002 ABC SUPPLY CO Accounts Payable Check 820.20 87692 12/27/2002 ACTION FAX&PRINTER Accounts Payable Check 102.90 87693 12/27/2002 ADAMSKI,MOROSKI,MADDEN,&GREEN Accounts Payable Check 4,200.00 87694 12/27/2002 ADDICTION MEDICINE CONSULTANTS Accounts Payable Check 770.00 87695 12/27/2002 MIKE ALOI Accounts Payable Check 175.00 87696 12/27/2002 AMERICAN SANITATION Accounts Payable Check 64.35 87697 12/27/2002 ANTECH DIAGNOSTICS Accounts Payable Check 10 87698 12/27/2002 AT&T Accounts Payable Check 210 87699 12/27/2002 ATASCADERO BATTERY EXCHANGE Accounts Payable Check 145.83 87700 12/27/2002 ATASCADERO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Accounts Payable Check 40.00 87701 12/27/2002 ATASCADERO GLASS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 48.62 87702 12/27/2002 ATASCADERO MUTUAL WATER CO. Accounts Payable Check 45.00 87703 12/27/2002 ATASCADERO NEWS Accounts Payable Check 1,266.60 87704 12/27/2002 ATASCADERO SAW SHOP Accounts Payable Check 56.00 87705 12/27/2002 AZA DIRECTORS'RETREAT Accounts Payable Check 175.00 87706 12/27/2002 CATHERINE BEACH Accounts Payable Check 20.00 87707 12/27/2002 CINDY K.BENSON Accounts Payable Check 106.51 87708 12/27/2002 BEST WESTERN HERITAGE INN Accounts Payable Check 86.90 87709 12/27/2002 BOSTON'S PET SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 101.86 87710 12/27/2002 BRENDLER JANITORIAL SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 800.00 87711 12/27/2002 JACK BRIDWELL Accounts Payable Check 300.00 87712 12/27/2002 CA DEPT OF FISH&GAME Accounts Payable Check 355.50 87713 12/27/2002 CAL-COAST REFRIGERATION,INC Accounts Payable Check 410.94 87714 12/27/2002 CENTRAL COAST STRIPING Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check 1 1,11 3. 87715 12/27/2002 CHEM CLEAN 6 U137 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of December 2002 Check Check tuber Date Vendor Description Amount 87716 12/27/2002 CHEVRON Accounts Payable Check 430.87 87717 12/27/2002 CHEVRON Accounts Payable Check 1,290.86 87718 12/27/2002 JERRY L.CLAY Accounts Payable Check 80.00 87719 12/27/2002 COASTLINE EQUIPMENT Accounts Payable Check 21228.93 87720 12/27/2002 CORNERSTONE COMMERCIAL CLEANIN Accounts Payable Check 150.00 87721 12/27/2002 COUNTRY COPY Accounts Payable Check 235.16 87722 12/27/2002 CREDIT BUREAU Accounts Payable Check 16.00 87723 12/27/2002 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER Accounts Payable Check 86.25 87726 12/27/2002 DANCRIS TELECOM Accounts Payable Check 259.84 87727 12/27/2002 DARRYL'S LOCK AND SAFE Accounts Payable Check 35.83 87728 12/27/2002 DAN DAVIS Accounts Payable Check 308.00 87729 12/27/2002 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Accounts Payable Check 1,496.87 87730 12/27/2002 DFM ASSOCIATES Accounts Payable Check 42.90 87731 12/27/2002 DGM ARCHITECT Accounts Payable Check 2,340.63 87732 12/27/2002 DURHAM COMMUNICATIONS INC Accounts Payable Check 1,269.83 87733 12/27/2002 EASY AD Accounts Payable Check 135.00 • ' 87734 12/27/2002 ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY COMMISSIO Accounts Payable Check 6 000.00 87735 12/27/2002 ECONOMIC VITALITY CORP OF SLO Accounts Payable Check 562.50 87736 12/27/2002 EL CAMINO BUILDING SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 69.72 87737 12/27/2002 EL CAMINO CAR WASH LLC Accounts Payable Check 44.45 87738 12/27/2002 EL CAMINO HOMELESS ORG. Accounts Payable Check 1,427.04 87739 12/27/2002 EOC HEALTH SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 3,500.00 87740 12/27/2002 ESCUELA DEL RIO Accounts Payable Check 119.60 87741 12/27/2002 EXXON MOBIL Accounts Payable Check 527.95 87742 12/27/2002 FEDERAL EXPRESS Accounts Payable Check 52.52 87743 12/27/2002 FIRE COM Accounts Payable Check 87.88 87744 12/27/2002 FRAZEE INDUSTRIES,INC. Accounts Payable Check 61.99 87745 12/27/2002 FRED PRYOR SEMINARS Accounts Payable Check 159.00 87746 12/27/2002 ANDREW FRUIN Accounts Payable Check 40.95 87747 12/27/2002 GALL'S INC. Accounts Payable Check 659.88 87748 12/27/2002 KAREN GARMAN Accounts Payable Check 571.20 87749 12/27/2002 GAS COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 1,950.25 87750 12/27/2002 KENNETH GLYNN Accounts Payable Check 532.00 87751 12/27/2002 GOVCONNECTION,INC. Accounts Payable Check 84.61 • 87752 12/27/2002 GUEST SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 198.00 87753 12/27/2002 FAMILY SUPPORT DIVISION Accounts Payable Check 23.09 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of December 2002 Check Check Number Date Vendor Description Amoun !& 87754 12/27/2002 HART IMPRESSIONS PRINT&COPY Accounts Payable Check 318.53 87755 12/27/2002 REGIONALD HICKS Accounts Payable Check 175.00 87756 12/27/2002 AMY HJORTLAND Accounts Payable Check 1,000.00 87757 12/27/2002 I.M.P.A.C.GOVERNMENT SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 6,621.72 87758 12/27/2002 INDUSTRIAL MEDICAL CENTER OF Accounts Payable Check 350.00 87759 12/27/2002 INGLIS PET HOTEL Accounts Payable Check 77.21 87760 12/27/2002 EVELYN INGRAM Accounts Payable Check 640.50 87761 12/27/2002 INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE INSTI Accounts Payable Check 60.00 87762 12/27/2002 J&S SWEEPING SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 1,879.00 87763 12/27/2002 K-MART Accounts Payable Check 59.26 87764 12/27/2002 LESLYN KEITH Accounts Payable Check 140.00 87765 12/27/2002 KEN'S MOBIL SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 1,104.90 87766 12/27/2002 KEY TERMITE&PEST CONTROL Accounts Payable Check 610.00 87767 12/27/2002 KPRL 1230 AM Accounts Payable Check 64.00 87768 12/27/2002 KRITZ EXCAVATING&TRUCKING Accounts Payable Check 252.33 87769 12/27/2002 L.N.CURTIS&SONS Accounts Payable Check 795.04 87770 12/27/2002 LAWTON PRINTING Accounts Payable Check 90. 87771 12/27/2002 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES Accounts Payable Check 7,985 87772 12/27/2002 LEE WILSON ELECTRIC CO.INC Accounts Payable Check 1,120.00 87773 12/27/2002 LEXIS NEXIS MATTHEW BENDER Accounts Payable Check 146.68 87774 12/27/2002 LOS PADRES COUNCIL Accounts Payable Check 106.00 87775 12/27/2002 MAINLINE Accounts Payable Check 300.00 87776 12/27/2002 MARTIN&CHAPMAN CO. Accounts Payable Check 52.90 87777 12/27/2002 MAUREEN KANE&ASSOCIATES,INC Accounts Payable Check 880.00 87778 12/27/2002 MAXIMUS Accounts Payable Check 664.00 87779 12/27/2002 BECKY MAXWELL Accounts Payable Check 47.88 87780 12/27/2002 MCALLISTER OFFICE PAVILION Accounts Payable Check 305.34 87781 12/27/2002 WADE MCKINNEY Accounts Payable Check 180.00 87782 12/27/2002 MICRO WAREHOUSE Accounts Payable Check 529.81 87783 12/27/2002 MIRACLE RECREATION EQUIPMENT Accounts Payable Check 193.23 87784 12/27/2002 MATTHEW J.MIRANDA Accounts Payable Check 38.00 87785 12/27/2002 JOSEPH MODICA JR. Accounts Payable Check 460.41 87786 12/27/2002 NATIONAL ORG.OF BLACK LAW Accounts Payable Check 100.00 87787 12/27/2002 NEW TIMES Accounts Payable Check 327.00 87788 12/27/2002 NORTH COAST ENGINEERING INC. Accounts Payable Check 5,4240 U City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of December 2002 Check Check umber Date Vendor Description Amount 87789 12/27/2002 NORTH COUNTY GLASS Accounts Payable Check 190.90 87790 12/27/2002 THOMAS P.O'MALLEY Accounts Payable Check 80.00 87791 12/27/2002 OMNI-MEANS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 1,100.00 87792 12/27/2002 OTTO ENGINEERING Accounts Payable Check 238.56 87793 12/27/2002 BECKY J.PACAS Accounts Payable Check 80.00 87794 12/27/2002 PACIFIC BELL Accounts Payable Check 274.43 87795 12/27/2002 PACIFIC BELL/WORLDCOM Accounts Payable Check 415.85 87797 12/27/2002 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC Accounts Payable Check 34 826.35 87798 12/27/2002 PASO ROBLES TRUCK CENTER Accounts Payable Check 60.75 87799 12/27/2002 BARBARA PATTON Accounts Payable Check 13.87 87800 12/27/2002 PAVEMENT ENGINEERING,INC. Accounts Payable Check 10 542.50 87801 12/27/2002 PC MALL Accounts Payable Check 4,305.79 87802 12/27/2002 FIRE DEPARTMENT PETTY CASH Accounts Payable Check 90.87 87803 12/27/2002 PG&E Accounts Payable Check 443.00 87804 12/27/2002 GRACE L.PUCCI Accounts Payable Check 52.50 87805 12/27/2002 PULITZER CENTRAL COAST NEWSPAP Accounts Payable Check 971.71 '87806 12/27/2002 R.BURKE CORPORATION Accounts Payable Check 438 000.07 • 87807 12/27/2002 RANGE MASTERS Accounts Payable Check 50.00 87808 12/27/2002 RECALL SECURE DESTRUCTION SERV Accounts Payable Check 42.00 87809 12/27/2002 REID ROOFING Accounts Payable Check 20 826.00 87810 12/27/2002 RELIABLE PROTEIN PRODUCTS Accounts Payable Check 934.79 87811 12/27/2002 RICK BUTLER BUSINESS MACHINES Accounts Payable Check 413.93 87812 12/27/2002 ROBERT F.DRIVER COMPANY,INC Accounts Payable Check 221.00 87813 12/27/2002 CAROLE ROBINSON Accounts Payable Check 400.00 87814 12/27/2002 SAFETY-KLEEN INC. Accounts Payable Check 115.00 87815 12/27/2002 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY SHERIFF Accounts Payable Check 18'707.49 87816 12/27/2002 SIGN OUTLET Accounts Payable Check 147.28 87817 12/27/2002 SMART AND FINAL Accounts Payable Check 258.20 87818 12/27/2002 SYLVESTER'S SECURITY ALARMS Accounts Payable Check 197.50 87819 12/27/2002 T-N-T PEST CONTROL Accounts Payable Check 88.00 87820 12/27/2002 TAYLOR RENTAL CENTER Accounts Payable Check 255.61 87821 12/27/2002 TEE'S PLUS Accounts Payable Check 813.55 87822 12/27/2002 TEMPLETON UNIFORMS Accounts Payable Check 21.45 87823 12/27/2002 TOM FLYNN&SONS Accounts Payable Check 1,800.00 • 87824 12/27/2002 MARCIA TORGERSON Accounts Payable Check 183.02 87825 12/27/2002 UNOCAL Accounts Payable Check 2,212.82 U4 City of Ataseadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of December 2002 Check Check Number Date Vendor Description Amoun� 87826 12/27/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS Accounts Payable Check 60.53 87827 12/27/2002 VINTAGE CATERING&CAFE Accounts Payable Check 2,444.39 87828 12/27/2002 W.W.GRAINGER,INC. Accounts Payable Check 271.36 87829 12/27/2002 TOM WAY Accounts Payable Check 60.00 87830 12/27/2002 WAYCO FIRE PROTECTION&SAFETY Accounts Payable Check 12.00 87831 12/27/2002 WESTERN JANITOR SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 293.56 87832 12/27/2002 WILKINS CREATIVE PRINTING Accounts Payable Check 61.34 87833 12/27/2002 JEFF WILSHUSEN Accounts Payable Check 718.40 87834 12/27/2002 WULFING'S POLYGRAPH SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 300.00 87835 12/27/2002 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES,INC. Accounts Payable Check 85.98 $ 1,452,223.70 • • u4i ITEM NUMBER: A-5 DATE: 02/11/2003 p • 1818 � 19 9 A�SCAnERO/ Atascadero City Council Staff Report - City Manager's Office Community Redevelopment Agency Annual Report for Fiscal-Year 2001-2002 RECOMMENDATION: Council review and accept the Community Redevelopment Agency Annual Report for fiscal year 2001-2002. DISCUSSION: California Redevelopment Law requires that the Community Redevelopment Agency("Agency") • adopt a Resolution approving an annual report and then present the annual report to the City Council for their consideration and approval. On January 14, 2003, the Agency adopted Resolution RA2003-001 approving the annual report for fiscal year 2001-2002 (Attachment 1). Review and acceptance of the Agency annual report by the City Council will complete the requirements of Health and Safety Code §33080. FISCAL IMPACT: None - for information only. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Reject the annual report and return it to the Redevelopment Agency for amendment. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Adopted Resolution RA2003-001 and Agency Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2001-2002 • - 042 ATTACHMENT 1 RESOLUTION NO. RA 2003-001 A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY • OF ATASCADERO ADOPTING THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ANNUAL REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001/2002 WHEREAS, California Redevelopment Law requires that the Redevelopment Agency Board approve an annual report pursuant to the requirements of the California Health and Safety Code,§33080.1; and WHEREAS, California Redevelopment Law further requires that the approved annual report be presented to the City Council; BE IT RESOLVED that the Redevelopment Agency Annual Report for the fiscal year 2001/2002 is approved. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Redevelopment Agency Board of the City of Atascadero this 10 Day of January 2003 by the following vote: On motion by Board Member Luna and seconded by Board Member Clay, the foregoing • Resolution is hereby adopted following roll call vote: AYES: Board Members Clay, Luna, O'Malley, Pacas and Chairperson Scalise NOES: None ABSENT: None ADOPTED: January 14, 2003 CITY OF ATASCA R By: Wend calise, Irperson ATTEST: -LL dlll ` 4a�'yy Marcia McClure Torgerson, Board APPROVED AS TO FORM: • Roy .. Hanley, Crty A rney u ITEM NUMBER: B-1 DATE: 01/14/2003 n iais � is s Community Redevelopment Agency of Atascadero Staff Report— Executive Director's Office Redevelopment Agency Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2001/2002 RECOMMENDATION: Board adopt draft Resolution approving the Redevelopment Agency Annual Report for fiscal year 2001/2002 and forward to City Council for consideration and approval. DISCUSSION: California Redevelopment Law requires that the Agency adopt a Resolution (Attachment 1) • approving an annual report and then presenting it to the City Council for their consideration and approval. The Annual Report must contain the components listed below. Following each item required in the report is a description of the Agency's activities in conformance with Health and Safety Code §33080. 1. An independent financial audit for the previous fiscal year: The Agency's auditors, Moss, Levy, & Hartzheim, have opined that the general-purpose financial statements fairly presented all material aspects of the results of operations in conformity with generally accepted accounting principals (Attachment 2). 2. A fiscal statement for the previous fiscal year that contains the information required pursuant to § 33080.5 (State Controller's Report): The Agency uses the State Controller's Annual Report of Redevelopment Financial Transactions to satisfy the requirements of 2 above. This report is prepared by staff and must be submitted to the State Controller's office within 180 days of year-end (12-31). The State Controller's Annual Report of Redevelopment Financial Transactions has been submitted to the State Controller's Office in accordance within the established deadline (Attachment 3). As of June 30, 2002, the Redevelopment Agency fund balance was$184,665. With regard • to the Agency's 20% low and moderate income housing operations (LMI Fund), the fund balance as of June 30, 2002 was$22Z978. ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 01/14/2003 3. A description of Agency activities affecting housing and displacement pursuant to • §33080.4: The Agency filed the State of California Department of Housing and Community Development Annual Report, which reported that there was no Redevelopment Agency housing activity in fiscal year 2001-2002. 4. A description of Agency progress in alleviating blight: Blight alleviation has been the highest priority of the Agency since its inception. Substantial initial progress on eliminating blight was achieved with the consummation of the purchase of the Diamond Adult World property and adjoining vacant lot which will include the elimination of the business from downtown and future redevelopment of the existing building and lot. 5. A list of and status on all loans more than $50,000 that in the previous year were in default or not in compliance with the terms: Not Applicable. 6. A description of the total number of properties owned and those the Agency has acquired in the previous year: • 5905 El Camino Real: a 4225 square foot two-story brick commercial building u-ith dormant residential units on second floor and 5915 El Camino Real, a 9500 square foot vacant lot. 7. Any information the Agency believes useful to explain its program and activities: Agency programs include downtown revitalization, Brownfield remediation and associated development opportunities and improvement of the low and moderate income housing stock in the Redevelopment Project area. FISCAL IMPACT: None. Information Only. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Amend or modify Report and/or Draft Resolution prior to submitting to City Council ATTACHMENTS: 1. Draft Resolution 2. Redevelopment Agency Financial Audit Opinion Letter 3. State Controller's Report of Redevelopment Agency Financial Transactions 45 DRAFT RESOLUTION • A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF ATASCADERO ADOPTING THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ANNUAL REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001/2002 WHEREAS, California Redevelopment Law requires that the Redevelopment Agency Board approve an annual report pursuant to the requirements of the California Health and Safety Code §33080.1; and WHEREAS, California Redevelopment Law further requires that the approved annual report be presented to the City Council; BE IT RESOLVED that the Redevelopment Agency Annual Report for the fiscal year 2001/2002 is approved. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Redevelopment Agency Board of the City of Atascadero this 14`h Day of January 2003 by the following vote: On motion by Board Member , and seconded by Board Me,nber the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted following roll call vote: AY�,S: NOES: ABSENT: ADOPTED: CITY OF ATASCADERO By: Wendy Scalise, Chairperson ATTEST: Marcia McClure Torgerson, Board Secretary is APPROVED AS TO FORM: Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney l• IVTL.L V 1 Vl 1 1/ AI\ ILL IL,IIVI CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS PARTNERS: 802 EAST MAIN ROBERT M.MOSS,C.P.A.' SANTA MARIA,CA 93454 RONALD A.LE`.Y,C.P.A.' PHONE:(805)925-2579 CRAIG A.HARc>-HEIM,C.PA.' FAX:(805)925-2)47 'DENOTES PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION INDEPENDENT AUDITORS'REPORT _ Board of Directors Redevelopment Agency of the City of Atascadero Atascadero, California We have audited the general-purpose financial statements of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Atascadero, a component unit of the City of Atascadero,as of and for the fiscal year ended June 30,2002,as listed in the table of contents. These general-purpose financial statements are the responsibility of the Agency's management.Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these general purpose financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining,on a test basis,evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in th* financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion,the general-purpose financial statements referred to above present fairly,in all material respects,the financial position of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Atascadero at June 30, 2002 and the results of its operations for the f tical year then ended,in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In accordance with Government Auditing Standards,we have also issued a report dated September 13, 2002,on our consideration of the Agency's internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laves,regulations, contracts and grants. That report is an integral part of our audit performed in accordance with this report when considering the results of our audit. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in cc.'ajunction with this report in considering the results of our audit. Our audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the financial statements taken as a whole. The accompanying combining and individual fund financial statements listed in the foregoing table of contents are presented for purposes of additional analysis and are not a required part of the general purpose financial statements of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Atascadero. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the financial statements and,in our opinion,is fairly presented, in all material respects,in relation to the general purpose financial statements taken as a whole. MOSS,LEVY&HARTZHEIM V J September 13,2002 1 OFFICES: BEVERLY HILLS • SANTA MARIA • SACRAMENTO • TUSTIN MEMBER AMERICiA INSTITUTE OF C.P.A'S•CALIFORNIA SOCIETY OF C.PA'S• CALIFORNIA SOCIETY OF MUNICIPAL FINANCE OFFICERS•CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL 3 JWSS OFFICIALS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCIES FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS REPORT COVER PAGE Atascadero Community Redevelopment Agency Fiscal Year: 2002 ID Number: 13984003200 S '' ed by: ", �C C` fYt((11S�fGt�1UP �� rV1Ce5 ;urreC7 r Signature Title he Name (Please Print) Date Per Health and Safety Code section 33080,this report is due within six months after the end of the fiscal year.The report is include two(2)copies of the agency's component unit audited financial statements,and the report on the Status and Use of the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund(HCD report). To meet the fling requirements,all portions must be received by the California State Controller's Office. • To file electronically: To file a paper report: 1.Complete all forms as necessary. 1.Complete all forms as necessary. 2.Transmit the completed output file using a File 2.Sign this cover page,and mail complete report to either Transfer Protocol(FTP)program or via diskette. address below with 2 audits and the HCD report. 3.Sign this cover page and mail to either address below With 2 audits and the HCD report. Report will not be considered filed until receipt of this signed cover page. Mailing Address: Express Mailing Address: State Controller's Office State Controller's Office Division of Accounting and Reporting Division of Accounting and Reporting Local Government Reporting Section Local Government Reporting Section P. O. Box 942850 3301 C Street, Suite 700 Sacramento, CA 94250 Sacramento, CA 95816 • _ U40 Supplement to the Annual Report of Community Redevelopment Agencies For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30,2002 • Redevelopment Agency ID Number: 119 3 a0 Name of Redevelopment Agency: r. - Address: Son Pcti Arc City,State,Zip: C9 S4 The U.S.Bureau of the Census requests the following information about the fiscal activities of your government for the 2001-2002 fiscal year(defined from July 1,2001 through June 30,2002).Governments furnishing this information will no longer receive Census Bureau Form F-32,Survey of Local Government Finances.If you have any questions please contact U.S.Bureau of the Census Jeffrey Little 1-800-2424523 A.Personnel Expenditures Report your government's total expenditures for salaries and wages during the year,including amounts paid on force account construction projects. Z00 $ 9K,0�Co B.Mortgage Revenue Bond Interest Payments Report your government's total amount of interest paid on mortgage revenue bonds during the year. U20 $ • O C.Cash and Investments Held at the End of the Fiscal Year Report separately for each of the three types of funds listed below,the total cash on hand,cash on deposit, and investments in Federal government,Federal agency,State and local government and non-governmental securities.Report all investments at par value. Include in the sinking fund total any mortgages and notes receivable held as offsets to housing and industrial financing loans.Exclude accounts receivable,value of real property and non-security assets. 1. Sinking Funds - Reserves held for the redemption of long-term W01 $ debt. 2.Bond Funds-Unexpended proceeds from the sale of bond issues W31 $ pending disbursement. — - 3.All Other Funds-Exclude employee retirement funds. W61 I�[,3�,3I#S U.S.Bureau of the Census—Revised 03/02 &49 • r. N O sy, s s C14 N_ S r CL o o p co o 00 CC s 9= aoo 3 - Q = LO :. m �+ C_ N N E a ui w04 m 75 0 CC � LL � � ; r �a is Q.t C, LO T(a coc i c N 04 Q y ? J v v O c to 0 d .F—' F aoo Cc > c4.: L • 1 UE H v C; 7 m C r z m o m m C "N cLa. co'i 3 d m m U r- 0 m k ud c '� L E H m y .mL. a t a f f '•U m Q W iLL N LL J U. to U N a �� awoaoaao �ooa Gam ' N m 96, O m Cl) L Z5 v o a in m CD ! tm E c > N m o c �' N L O in 0 $ J J U (n Q —Oi co '0 ( c c� a _ O m N O y In m R. y Q C m ( L L L L L L L L L m m m m O r' N L A a s C d d C N v E m E E E E E E E E E m m w O m U) m = m m m m m m m m m co L c a � 4 k d +V ou • � C) N O) scv CJ t x L FY O li r Hl `r �ty m a E ca s J c c4, m Cc: N - C dO m g, @ co F� p - mm rcr w- Nv E �• p a r CDg N %r tQ p cr c v rz C v apt K ' r m h v cScc� c SO Q a o Q m arm. E c a« o 0 o E c o 0 o E:6 a U >+ U C, m a0i U Q p >m,C- CL - a 0 m: v o '20 O > 0 N w v m° 3 c p o.m c c 3? Q3 m 0 ¢ c m Q No cC9 Uc �, o Y E N CL m U �° Q o a� m 4o O°' atom E . 0 0 , 3 m �>-- LL v � m U��� V m� �p cam Q >, m� U) E0 0 c m m C N— U O m C 'O 11 O- r LuN XX C � ¢ h a) 040 0 rn m .�i i� 'Ei• m L L U U ' m H i (3) •,0 r' r C 'C 0-- m j d ;k Q d aa)i a y 4 V f� LL m Q r > V a 0 0 m O _ m E o y o f ` h X X k E E c ro O y 4. O a) O) •O C j O U O 3 a) o 0 4 E t. a� m O p rNi S c t° m U m �' cti m C;ca Vj d O ° = y Q o ca cti r) y d E y 'Mn y ° � c -. d o g h -. Ct ra 00. Q m 8 � y t 3 H 3 v ` O v m m G1 �Y ro ,n m m c ° d 3 d -4c) m a� m m c ��E._-, m �• a) ° c p Zm N a x y — C aOd CL C) w a) N h Ud Om V o .0 c{ oU o S'l 3 n- d M d 4) ate) m N ami c m r- 2 m c c m `' E '') E c a m �° ro m E.f.;,�i °" � H' •p m �• m .fl m V O c J J O� it d o o c 3 t m ¢_ O �_ a� a y ami ami o , o p o m aa) U Q fi m 0 0 m c 4) n o m m m ro N L C °) m d R' N T C O N N ca m •U C w _ N m U O m m a) z .-f, O C w a) a' O O — N aCL ) d N d T a) x { a ti w o° o o w w z iii a n O O, -v .A Rim sop y� . R N a) o o m f) o; `a)d ami I CL tA CL) CL > 11 R v N N V, ! m E _ a•s I rri f V 3M�:- v R yQ cm i 0 pq, LL O..-O 4 f f C01 OI OiOi 0- n; Ot O O O? O' 0i O� <tE o 2: �s n, bs u9 �; 6s u� sv s9 C)I u� �; m ► o t ri! to boll O i y t 6q, p-�4 S O Q, ID CL I LL � � f c 7 i C^ R m m 7 0D 3 N O LL m Oi R x v "i' a ui s.. N C C �n vl N U_ i C o =` y C E : co N U E o �} i o C- m � N yvC I C �,:.� 01 _C LL > i Q a I a� N p N o �a C): c nCD a m > @ m x < tEi C q d C x N U N w C LL C h G fC . . {t.•+ Z N Q C N x C .�. Q N E g h = 3 s V c c D > _ fN x ` m n m c m m em c m o m i f'•,�4*, : r�I Ln o N I 0 0+ o` of o o o� o! o+ o r,_ •Z r{ a0 h. 69� e9I 69j 64; 69� b9� 69 b9i b9 N tF' 2T - f0 I iC N, NI It its �r r 0 3 o _ O N d m e N t L W j LO ►. U v O o x 2 Rf � E w 3 0 . O. }- i cm N l9 t•Q�,•. a Q •� cn w U. EV r�rs� O d _ E co ti tE C (D rn W N it, p r M to ULL 0 04 N vG.vO . y� •.. � w 7 d C LL w i2: m Nr �? E w t0: d N14 °Q. Q O �j N m r ad 0 o N C a c = a }f x 07 fl. C C W 0 co d C R c HU @ L C 7 d O O O E xrr d Z >. 2 o - d y 8 O a g V > J e W w U d c o o v ro c N m o c c E U p O is d g w o o af4i @ e aei 00 o 0 aa) a N Q a n- of Q o w of co a 0 JCC cn • K € O O Ot N OI O Qj O; Oi OI O� O! O N s ` _ 69 69, 69. pf 69 69 69 69 69; 69 tH:. 691 UlI N \ 101 `;W- t 64' vx: r oc A p .,L m b y r Q N m to td k�•fir L: --' w w C_ to�. N 69 _ m 3 69 U'. m o = = la 0. I m FQiSL N J C. -0 m d p En. 69 d a_ m LU N 7 5 LL gFt V. m N M, N)l 0 v V h• r� t:A d t" U c m O O O' 00 (O Ln ++= O d c C .. U. cc U. 69 69 m m CL = VCL I I 0 1K rte+ c X R 4s o m m W ya{+/ S''.3 d .a cc H E > N y ��-•�� N Q � cg h H c 'O d a a o m c v 12 rn o o m <c . ' m m c Z w m x w v Co w v m ° = c c U c ca ami m v c0 c c u m c� w or f4 'O C E y 'L C N y v 3 N y r» Z i y N N v >, m � c� E o my m L o N 7 0 c om. o U m w c E o U Y m m vi c > H c a vii v m c y Q J `� T C. Q c Q c O. a x C ca MY R G) S u'S cy� to o x a c m m co J W m m c a& ` U '� m — — in ¢ v co h w a, a cam q L ;a cros v m F ± LL r t y avi a a > c Fo- w +: z m m m x o o m 0t m co mcoo - -. � u. cn= 0 0 F p I- y a m -c� Q "4 f £ r of o o 0 0 LO o uf) o; ui7 o Ce) C11 Lql z i ! r T; r-I Cl)f of �, a Jh ,� o 04� m a C U O r may ' _ d @ LO O tA . O A, C O r pi 3 h LO M: o Il n y �c E = c E Q' i °� I @ a. Ll C). Q y 3 •Cx_a N t3. LL d R U i U. LO LO t Y. Wt (4 W y Q_b U C 0 d d � M � O � a o m Nj O -C - LL47 UL1 .. c E W i N 0. - EOE m N Q U c I c ta: N ii 1s �9• w C U H U C H y d CO � Q N 0 7 O NEi C CL O D7 Ct Z D ap 0 rn 5 W f ` t6 € O V C CO w O w V C n r L C LoC C O R f9 O CI E Uf f�6 C f` C f0 m C d tC d J O '6 3 O O O X e j v- th LL d v No c CL m a m r- d o U = U cc C ;•meq (D N N C p y �q C E2 C .0 +� N • a a a Q N O F O f- n i �. N • C) O O I Cl) N ICIC w 6% 4` fD i O r I ___.� _._� c - _O y o CS65,I `fit FM 691 69 E✓) 64. C m NN C 9 O mss; N o 2 Ni U N: rLL 2 d t w3 L m O O ` y p N n c m Y j �C" N� t2 •p 9y u' 1 i i U C3 LL E F 1 1 t i i a- Ec' :+ m tD o f to � N O � Mat 00 .��. a v v� a Q ` 0 C I i nj in LL. m aI v. � ° o E v 1 C _ c R t4' r�Gy m N Q = s•grf yo- w V ? w 5. a=i >cu o c � d� TC � L O v I W Z o ° o E m a R m R d Or- ca m R c Q c c .c w a m R R N O e xil ll. �. V L Q ` h cr WOW Q c ai L o W E O O a> z 57 tp' OOf O! O: Oi O' 69� coNI �� 69, E91 69 69i 69t 690 fAj FfD� O- t co _ t i 13 LL x6 tXF f7� x Ocli O C LciN 0) m rn d r LC �' m ccv C3 � ti N we o co rl W r 3 y 013 ov Q gID ELL O O 0 C) Q v m y c v fQ ,�' �_• 1n y ;g CD U) LL to%.• O.� o F aLO c O� co co c r h O y LO ) J L H LlC N LL � CO m N m N d N 9) U N O G C> G U 0 0 CE a m oLL y LL C14 (D mh y v LL E aY c a) W r LL' U o o' to p L m 00 E E E= E— v cn t a y c n E o 0 0 o c c (�p� tyy U U O LL c9 coA CQ � C 7 7 7 v 7 N co •' .ate �� co U5 1 i i • i.sz O1 Ni O Off, s N c r fsi! nl �� �C I LO r LL � VEy aCo F' .• d c Alrn CD �_ �t {'�': T�-_ tit? • tQ' O z t, .Q • w d LOLo CO, as �- z Q I o F O V O 64 6a C U h ca d d m rn C '. LL r- Q ) co rn LO O i to ..:: c :. } m ti 69 m •+'y j co t°r cliOC N N N O 6 R3 coG � a o y chi o v ca p } c udi c m= ayi yaci Q ti o o a w W U cn O C .0 IL N N N N _! X 2 Q. O m Oco ` 0o �� a o U- wdna o X59 cq O Oi O� CD. O O'. O O� O, O: O t � ff� d9i 69l fH fA; to 69 69' fR. my r 'i R iI 0:) m ci P5 y x ft LL t (9 5, �* cm o � C m J i w 0 CD C3. N.. v ro�• t S. �' �'ag` t C GO r~ O N � � 0 t(f f° o � d C01 OLL X c " R 3LL G E:d O l tm, = vcn s m ; N �QCd` d O r, c� co O� u � '0 tt N r t0 co co m U- r a w o v @ CD w m CU cn J N d c N ^p d U L- 4 s o O m z o d u LL o V >+.o F- J -am ] = .� •7 .0 >= co CD c Q O cmc t cco n >+ LI m N p y d U d cm J J w cn i s 7 d m Q. d U 0 J to � O n U N '� O O O O Q d Q c (D d > x cc � U F- Uco V .a al X cv a� C) m N ca N LL co a � J0000= a-U- aLM • �V YY O O O' C"Y fh O: N • O a i 7 ^_ ^j O� N_ C3 C3 KIM Etik: It v Q1 C � 7 $ NAA x c C>i 12 �. k Y Q4S g;.On r L Or O N U o. c LL C`. N > m > 04 i ,C GRN' O c() Z5J i. if ojj rml U� Q- o. OC C NU. c ca CD co LO co 'yo t0 u) 0 co X i% ami v m v n,i� m M N CO N W J V aNi U) m m N m N to O O +' Q d N C C C O W + u U. �� � • r^ � r N a »' m N- o to o to; o C U cn M' cli G1 kkyy c» �; CD �rj s i Q. Oz c r—.-j K u., m Q° N 'a E c O E E U) F 3 C C C d E CD y x N c c W -a� co O Fc- O Fes- c m �2 E � C •- 't�vrt.�.. Y3tio-. CU ITEM NUMBER: A-6 DATE: 02/11/2003 • iaes ■ is�a Atascadero City Council Staff Report - Public Works Department Final Parcel Map 2002-0026 (Parcel Map AT 99-306) [TPM 2000-0001] 10450 Morro Road (Thomas) RECOMMENDATION: Council accept Final Parcel Map 2002-0026 (Parcel Map AT 99-306). DISCUSSION: • The Planning Commission approved Tentative Parcel Map 2000-0001 on March 20, 2001. The Final Map subdivides a 32.8-acre residential lot into three parcels of 12.9 acres, 15.1 acres and 48 acres each. The site is located in the Residential Suburban zoning district, with a minimum lot size of 4.39 acres as calculated using performance standards for the RS zoning district, which allows for the proposed use and density when certain findings are made. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 66440 the approving legislative body (City Council) cannot deny a final map that is consistent with an approved tentative map. The legislative body is also required to accept, accept subject to improvement or reject, on behalf of the public, any real property offered for dedication for public use in conformity with the terms of the offer of dedication. No offers of dedication have been made on this map. Staff has determined that the Final Parcel Map is consistent with approved Tentative Parcel Map. FISCAL IMPACT: None. ATTACHMENT: Exhibit A: Final Parcel Map 2002-0026 (Parcel Map AT 99-306) • 6 Exhibit A Final Parcel Map 2002-0026(Parcel Map AT 99-306) 10450 Morro Road • F e a; •� a sill `r IL D N _ tN F ROpq, • CI llw��;�M�� F3 •r0'�• k y b SS •S f 2 s_ La.w f'" t IL e ILf RBS 4�pK4k _- RAR 134#s4 !:� >• six x I a 3 R O A D ` gd 4 Sal 4// LU a ��t ! _� a # r • eYe _ Final Map 2002-0026 Page 2 of 2 �b � ITEM NUMBER: A-7 DATE: 02/11/2003 .s.4 1918 - � 197A • ��SCAD�� Atascadero City Council Staff Report - Public Works Department Final Parcel Map 2002-0041 (Tract 2453) [TTM 2001-0013] 2750 El Camino Real (Gearhart/Wilson) RECOMMENDATIONS: Council: 1. Accept Final Parcel Map 2002-0041 (Tract 2453) 2. Reject offer of dedication for Public Utility Easement without prejudice to future acceptance. • 3. Authorize City Manager to execute Subdivision Agreement with Kelly Gearhart. DISCUSSION: The Planning Commission adopted a resolution approving the Tentative Tract Map 2001-0013 on April 16, 2002. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 66440 the approving legislative body (City Council) cannot deny a final map that is consistent with an approved tentative map. The legislative body is also required to accept, accept subject to improvement or reject, on behalf of the public, any real property offered for dedication for public use in conformity with the terms of the offer of dedication. Staff recommends rejecting the offer of dedication for Public Utility Easement without prejudice to future acceptance. Staff has determined that the Final Parcel Map is consistent with approved Tentative Tract Map. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A: Final Parcel Map 2002-0041 (Tract 2453) Exhibit B: Subdivision Agreement • February 11,2003 Final Map 2002-0041 (Tract 2453) Page 1 of 9 Exhibit A Final Map 2002-0041 (Tract 2453) 2750 El Camino Real • � n I h FF ? ±F IN �s x� Y�71 F• 'F x�Ys $ �s � H y n1 qMfg jr a+ Y_� it � 1. t t� NW } Q.a .. YT•r- rryY >£: rut Y cs Y X, E 7�ilt h E � et 12 t i m 7 0t al it V, �(= February • Final Map 2002 0041 (Tract 2453) Page 2 of 9 Exhibit B Subdivision Agreement 2750 El Camino Real • FOR RECORDER USE ON LY RECORDING REQUESTED BY: City of Atascadero WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: City Clerk City of Atascadero 6500 Palma Avenue Atascadero, CA. 93422 CITY OF ATASCADERO SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT • DATE OF AGREEMENT: NAME OF SUBDIVIDER: Kelly Gearhart SUBDIVISION: Tract 2453-APN 049-201-025 ESTIMATED TOTAL COST OF IMPROVEMENTS: $62,775 This Agreement made and entered into by and between the City of Atascadero, a municipal corporation of the State of California (hereinafter referred to as "City") and Kelly Gearhart (hereinafter referred to as"Subdivider"). RECITALS A. Subdivider has presented to the City Council of the City of Atascadero Tract Map 2453 for approval but not all of the improvements required or conditions imposed by Title 11, Chapter 8 Articles 3 and 4 and Chapter 10 of the Atascadero Municipal Code have been completed or performed. B. Subdivider desires to record Tract Map 2453 after the same has been approved by the City Council of the City of Atascadero. is C. The Subdivision Laws establish as a condition precedent to the approval of a parcel map that Subdivider must have either completed, in compliance with City Standards, all of the February 11,2003 Fina!Map 2002-0041 (Tract 2453) Page 3 of-9 667 b7 ITEM NUMBER: A-7 DATE: 02/11/2003 • improvements and land development work required by Tract Map 2453 or have entered into a secured agreement with City to complete the improvements and land development within a period of time specified by City. D. In consideration of approval of Tract Map 2453 by the City Council, Subdivider desires to enter into this Agreement, whereby Subdivider promises to install and complete, at the Subdivider's own expense, all of the public improvement work required by City in connection with S ubd ivis ion. E. Improvement Plans for the construction, installation and completion of the improvements have been prepared by Subdivider and approved by the City Engineer. The Improvement Plans for Tract Map 2453 are on file in the Office of the City Engineer and are incorporated into this Agreement by this reference. All references in this Agreement to the Improvement Plans shall include reference to any specifications for the improvements as approved by the City E ngineer. F. An estimate of the cost for construction of the public improvements according to the Improvement Plans has been made and has been approved by the City Engineer. The Estimated Total Cost of Improvements is stated on Page 1 of this Agreement. The basis for the estimate is attached as Exhibit "A" to this Agreement. G. Subdivider recognizes that by approval of Tract Map 2453, City has conferred substantial • rights upon Subdivider, including the right to sell, lease, or finance lots within the subdivision, and has taken the final act necessary to construct the public improvements within the subdivision. As a result, City will be damaged to the extent of the cost of installation of the improvements bySubdivider's failure to perform its obligations underthis Agreement, including, but not limited to,Subdivider's obligation to commence construction of the improvements by the time established in this Agreement. City shall be entitled to all remedies available to it pursuant to this Agreement and law in event of a default by Subdivider. It is specifically recognized that the determination of whether a reversion to acreage or rescission of Tract Map 2453 constitutes an adequate remedy for default by the Subdivider shall be within the sole discretion of City. NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the provisions contained in the Atascadero Municipal Code, Title 11, Chapter 10, sections 11-10.010 through 11-10.022, and in consideration of the approval by the City Council and the filing of Tract Map 2453, the parties hereto do promise and agree one with the other as follows: 1. Subdivider is to make and complete all of the improvements for Tract Map 2453 as shown on the Improvement Plans thereof and as required and set forth in Title 11, Chapter 8, Articles 3 and 4, and Chapter 10, of the Atascadero Municipal Code, or as amended. 2. It is further understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto that the improvements as required by the conditions of approval for Tract Map 2453 shall be completed within one year from the Date of Agreement. These improvements include, but • February 11,2003 Final Map 2002-0041 (Tract 2453) Page 4 of 9 ITEM NUMBER: A-7 • DATE: 02/11/2003 are not limited to the following: those shown on the plans accepted by the City Engineer and on attached Exhibit A. 3. The Subdivider promises and agrees to complete all improvement work referred to hereinabove to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 4. If said improvement work is not completed within one year of the Date of Agreement, the Subdivider agrees that the City may elect to complete the same. 5. In the event the City elects to complete said work or improvement, the Subdivider agrees that the City may exercise it's option to declare the bond or deposit, as hereinafter described, forfeited and utilize the proceeds, including any interest, to complete said improvements or that the City may complete said improvements and recover full cost and expense thereof including reasonable attorney fees from the Subdivider and his/her surety. 6. The Subdivider shall, prior to submitting the map for filing, file an improvement security with the City, in a form acceptable to the City Attorney, in the amount of the Estimated Total Cost of Improvements, which is the amount deemed sufficient by the City Engineer. In no case shall the improvement security be less than 100% of the Estimated Total Cost of Improvements. Further, the Subdivider shall file a security for labor and materials in the amount of the Estimated Total Cost of Improvements. The security for labor and materials • shall be no less than 50% of the Estimated Total Cost of Improvements. Periodic progress payments may be authorized to the Subdivider as the improvements are completed if adequate security remains as determined by the City Engineer, however, no such progress payments shall be made for more than 90% of the value of any work. Progress payments shall only be paid on work that is completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 7. The Subdivider hereby agrees that after the completion and acceptance of the improvements as specified in paragraphs 2 and 3, 10% of the improvement security shall be retained for the guarantee and warranty of the work for a period of one year. 8. It is understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto that this Agreement shall bind the heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns of the respective parties to this agreement. 9. In the event legal action is taken to enforce the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover costs to enforce the Agreement, including reasonable attorney fees. 10. The Subdivider shall, defend, indemnify and save harmless the City, its officers, agents and employees from any and all claims, demands, damages, costs, expenses, or liability occasioned by the performance and attempted performance of the provisions hereof, or in any way arising out of this Agreement, including, but not limited to, inverse condemnation, equitable relief, or any wrongful act or any negligent act or omission to act on the part of • the Property Owner or of agents, employees, or independent contractors directly February 11,2003 Final Map 2002-0041 (Tract 2453) Page 5 of 9 ITEM NUMBER: A-7 •DATE: 02/11/2003 responsible to the Property Owner, providing further that the foregoing shall apply to any wrongful acts, or any actively or passively negligent acts or omissions to act, committed jointly or concurrently by the Applicant, the Property Owner's agents, employees, or independent contractors. Nothing contained in the foregoing indemnity provisions shall be construed to require the Property Owner to indemnify the City against any responsibility or liability in contravention of Section 2782 of the Civil Code. 11. Upon acceptance of the work on behalf of City and recordation of the Notice of Completion, ownership of the improvements constructed pursuant to this Agreement shall vest in City. 12. Sale or other disposition of this property will not relieve Subdivider form the obligations set forth herein. Subdivider agrees to notify City in writing at least 30 days in advance of any actual or pending sale or other disposition of the property. If Subdivider sells the property or any portion of the property within the Subdivision to any other person, Subdivider may request a novation of this Agreement and a substitution of security. Upon approval of the novation and substitution of securities,Subdivider may request a release or reduction of the securities required by this Agreement. Nothing in the novation shall relieve the Subdivider of the obligations under Paragraph 2 for the work or improvement done by Subdivider. 13. All notices required or provided for under this Agreement shall be in writing and delivered in person or sent by mail, postage prepaid and addressed as provided in this section. • Notice shall be effective on the date it is delivered in person, or, if mailed, on the date of deposit in the United States Mail. Notices shall be addressed as follows unless a written change of address is filed with City: C ity: City of Atas Cade ro 6500 Palma Avenue Atascadero, CA 93422 Subdivider: Kelly Gearhart 6205 Alcantara Ave. Atascadero, CA 93422 S urety: 14. The provisions of this Agreement are severable. If any portion of this Agreement is held invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect unless amended or modified by the mutual consent of the parties. February 11,2003 • Final Map 2002-0041 (Tract 2453) Page 6 of 9 t1 � UI ITEM NUMBER: A-7 • DATE: 02/11/2003 15. The Recitals to this Agreement are hereby incorporated into the terms of this Agreement. 16. This Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter. All modifications, amendments, or waivers of the terms of this Agreement must be in writing and signed by the appropriate representatives of the parties. In the case of City, the appropriate party shall be the City Manager. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Property Owner has hereunto set his/her hand and the City has caused these presents to be signed by its duly sworn and authorized officers the day and year first hereinabove written. CITY OF ATASCADERO SUBDIVIDER: By: (Notarize signature) Wade G. McKinney City Manager Attest: iMarcia M. Torgerson City Clerk Approved as to content: Steven B. Kahn, P.E. City E ngineer Approved as to form: Roy A Hanley City Attorney • February 11,2003 Final Map 2002-0041 (Tract 2453) Page 7 of 9 ITEM NUMBER: A-7 DATE: 02/11/2003 • EXHIBIT "A" ENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE COST Project:Tract 2453 6-lot Industrial 2750 EI Camino Real Data: 1110912002 OFFSITE BONDING ESTIMATE-No Onsite Imo's N.Q. 11emDeSCril2tiOn Quanity Units Unit Cost Item Total Totals 1,$ite Clear and Grubb clear&grubb 1 LS $1,000.00 $1.000.00 Site Clear and Grubb Total $1,000,00 2 Demolition asphalt sawcutting 225 LF $1.25 5281.25 Demolition Total $281.25 3 Earthwork cut 0 CY $3.50 complete fill 0 CY $4.50 complete overexcavation and recompact subgrade 0 CY $4.50 complete finish grading 3.235 SF $0.50 $1,617.50 erosion control 1 LS $1,500.00 51,500:00 Earthwork Total $3,117.50 4 Road Surface Itngravements traffic control 1 LS 52,000.00 52,000.00 Driveway Approach 225 SF 55.50 51,237.50 6'concrete curb&18"gutter 116 LF $14.00 51,624.00 concrete sidewalk 645 SF $3,50 S2,257.50 3'Type'B7 asphalt paving 3,235 SF $0.90 $2,911,50 12'Class 2 aggregate base 3,235 SF $1.08 $3,493,80 signage 1 EA $250,00 $250,00 Road Surface Imp.Total $13,774.30 5 Drainage and Erosion Control 12-inch Storm drain pipe 62 LF $20.00 $1,240.00 36-inch Stam drain pipe 22 LF $75.00 $1,650.00 Catch Basin(Christey U52) 1 EA $2,200.00 $2,200.00 drainage basin outlet structure 1 LS $2,000.00 $2,000.00 rock rip-rap 1 LS $400.00 $400.00 erosion control 1 LS $1,000.00 $1.000.00 Drainage and EC Total $8,490.00 6 Water Sy tem 1=1`0vements 64nch PVC water tine 338 LF $2300 $7,774.00 tie-in 10 existing 84nch PVC water 1 EA $1,200.00 $1,200.00 64nch gate valve 1 EA $2,400.00 $2,400.00 fire hydrant assembly Qncl.valve) i EA $2,700.00 $2,700,00 water service 6: EA $750.00 $+:500.00 Water Total $18,574.00 7 Sewer System Imrovements 6-inch PVC sewer line 25 LF $50.00 $1,250.00 Geon to existing sewer 1 EA $500.00 $500.00 sewer manhole 1 EA $2,300.00 $2,300.00 Sewer Total $4,050.00 R Thompson Consulting Confidential Sheetl Page 1 • Page 8 of 9 072 ITEM NUMBER: DATE: 02/11/2003 • 8 Site utilities gas main 1 LS $300.00 $300.0{7 relocate power pole 1 EA 55,000.00 $5,000.00 Site utilities Total $5,300.00 Sub-TOTAL $54,587.05 9 Miscellaneous staking.testing,inspection 1 LS 5% $2,729.35 10%Contingency 1 LS 10% $5,458.71 Miscellaneous Total . $8:188.06 GRAND TOTAL $62,775.11 Ar By:R Thompson C ulting �p,OFESSftJ>,,Q Russell S.Thompson,PE Date PENO'C43069 a Registered Civil Engineer 043,069 Exp.3.31-04 EXP 3-314)4 cJV4L r Of CL,ert4, • R Thompson Consulting Confidential Shesti Page 2 • Page 9 of 9 ' ITEM NUMBER: A-8 DATE: 02/11/2003 1918 1979 Atascadero City Council Staff Report—Public Works Department Final Parcel Map 2002-0045 (Tract 2479) [TTM 2002-00171 3200 El Camino Real (Gearhart/Wilson) RECOMMENDATIONS: Council: 1. Accept Final Parcel Map 2002-0045 (Tract 2479) 2. Reject offer of dedication for Street Purposes and Public Utility Easements without prejudice to future acceptance. 3. Authorize City Manager to execute Subdivision Agreement with Kelly Gearhart. • DISCUSSION: The Planning Commission adopted a resolution approving the Tentative Tract Map 2001-0017 on August 20, 2002. The Tentative Tract Map approved the subdivision and construction of a 10-Unit industrial complex consisting of approximately 33,000 square-feet. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 66440 the approving legislative body (City Council) cannot deny a final map that is consistent with an approved tentative map. The legislative body is also required to accept, accept subject to improvement or reject, on behalf of the public, any real property offered for dedication for public use in conformity with the terms of the offer of dedication. Staff recommends rejecting the offer of dedication for Street Purposes and Public Utility Easements without prejudice to future acceptance. Staff has determined that the Final Parcel Map is consistent with approved Tentative Tract Map. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A: Final Parcel Map 2002-0045 (Tract 2479) Exhibit B: Subdivision Agreement • February 11,2003 674 Final Map 2002-0045(Tract 2479) Page 1 of 9 Exhibit A Final Map 2002-0045(Tract 2479) 3200 El Camino Real • 1- ,ej- a eQ EL CAM1N0 REAS ' ! I ;Uj $ >+. gw �$ L � till f I s QQ v 10 e a Y fillO j t 0 ItiQi g _ h lZ r H� WA Y 01 February • February 11,2003 Tract Map 2479 Agreement Page 2 of 10 Exhibit B Subdivision Agreement 3200 El Camino Real FOR RECORDER USE ONLY RECORDING REQUESTED BY: City of Atascadero WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: City Clerk City of Atascadero 6500 Palma Avenue Atascadero, CA. 93422 CITY OF ATASCADERO SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT • DATE OF AGREEMENT: NAME OF SUBDIVIDER: KELLY GEARHART SUBDIVISION: 3200 EI Camino Real/APN 049-211-018 ESTIMATED TOTAL COST OF IMPROVEMENTS: $398,680.88 This Agreement made and entered into by and between the City of Atascadero, a municipal corporation of the State of California (hereinafter referred to as "City") and KELLY GEARHART (hereinafter referred to as"Subdivider"). RECITALS A. Subdivider has presented to the City Council of the City of Atascadero Tract Map 2479 for approval but not all of the improvements required or conditions imposed by Title 11, Chapter 8 Articles 3 and 4 and Chapter 10 of the Atascadero Municipal Code have been completed or performed. B. Subdivider desires to record Tract Map 2479 after the same has been approved by the City Council of the City of Atascadero. C. The Subdivision Laws establish as a condition precedent to the approval of a parcel map that Subdivider must have either completed, in compliance with City Standards, all of the improvements and land development work required by Tract Map 2479 or have entered February 11,2003 Tract Map 2479 Agreement Page 3 of 10 076 ITEM NUMBER: A-8 DATE: 02/11/2003 • into a secured agreement with City to complete the improvements and land development within a period of time specified by City. D. In consideration of approval of Tract Map 2479 by the City Council, Subdivider desires to enter into this Agreement, whereby Subdivider promises to install and complete, at the Subdivider's own expense, all of the public improvement work required by City in connection with Subdivision. E. Improvement Plans for the construction, installation and completion of the improvements have been prepared by Subdivider and approved by the City Engineer. The Improvement Plans for Tract Map 2479 are on file in the Office of the City Engineer and are incorporated into this Agreement by this reference. All references in this Agreement to the Improvement Plans shall include reference to any specifications for the improvements as approved by the City E ngineer. F. An estimate of the cost for construction of the public improvements according to the Improvement Plans has been made and has been approved by the City Engineer. The Estimated Total Cost of Improvements is stated on Page 1 of this Agreement. The basis for the estimate is attached as Exhibit "A" to this Agreement. G. Subdivider recognizes that by approval of Tract Map 2479, City has conferred substantial rights upon Subdivider, including the right to sell, lease, or finance lots within the subdivision, and has taken the final act necessary to construct the public improvements • within the subdivision. As a result, City will be damaged to the extent of the cost of installation of the improvements by S ubdivider's failure to perform its obligations under this Agreement, including, but not limited to,S ubdivider's obligation to commence construction of the improvements by the time established in this Agreement. City shall be entitled to all remedies available to it pursuant to this Agreement and law in event of a default by Subdivider. It is specifically recognized that the determination of whether a reversion to acreage or rescission of Tract Map 2479 constitutes an adequate remedy for default by the Subdivider shall be within the sole discretion of City. NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the provisions contained in the Atascadero Municipal Code, Title 11, Chapter 10, sections 11-10.010 through 11-10.022, and in consideration of the approval by the City Council and the filing of Tract Map 2479, the parties hereto do promise and agree one with the other as follows: 1. Subdivider is to make and complete all of the improvements for Tract Map 2479 as shown on the Improvement Plans thereof and as required and set forth in Title 11, Chapter 8, Articles 3 and 4, and Chapter 10, of the Atascadero Municipal Code, or as amended. 2. It is further understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto that the improvements as required by the conditions of approval for Tract Map 2479 shall be completed within one year from the Date of Agreement. These improvements include, but are not limited to the following: those shown on the plans accepted by the City Engineer and on attached Exhibit A. • February 11,2003 Tract Map 2479 Agreement Page 4 of 10 a ITEM NUMBER: A-8 DATE: 02/11/2003 3. The Subdivider promises and agrees to complete all improvement work referred to hereinabove to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 4. If said improvement work is not completed within one year of the Date of Agreement, the Subdivider agrees that the City may elect to complete the same. 5. In the event the City elects to complete said work or improvement, the Subdivider agrees that the City may exercise it's option to declare the bond or deposit, as hereinafter described, forfeited and utilize the proceeds, including any interest, to complete said improvements or that the City may complete said improvements and recover full cost and expense thereof including reasonable attorney fees from the Subdivider and his/her surety. 6. The Subdivider shall, prior to submitting the map for filing, file an improvement security with the City, in a form acceptable to the City Attorney, in the amount of the Estimated Total Cost of Improvements, which is the amount deemed sufficient by the City Engineer. In no case shall the improvement security be less than 100% of the Estimated Total Cost of Improvements. Further, the Subdivider shall file a security for labor and materials in the amount of the Estimated Total Cost of Improvements. The security for labor and materials shall be no less than 50% of the Estimated Total Cost of Improvements. Periodic progress payments may be authorized to the Subdivider as the improvements are completed if • adequate security remains as determined by the City Engineer, however, no such progress payments shall be made for more than 90% of the value of any work. Progress payments shall only be paid on work that is completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 7. The Subdivider hereby agrees that after the completion and acceptance of the improvements as specified in paragraphs 2 and 3, 10% of the improvement security shall be retained for the guarantee and warranty of the work for a period of one year. 8. It is understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto that this Agreement shall bind the heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns of the respective parties to this agreement. 9. In the event legal action is taken to enforce the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover costs to enforce the Agreement, including reasonable attorney fees. 10. The Subdivider shall, defend, indemnify and save harmless the City, its officers, agents and employees from any and all claims, demands, damages, costs, expenses, or liability occasioned by the performance and attempted performance of the provisions hereof, or in anyway arising out of this Agreement, including, but not limited to, inverse condemnation, equitable relief, or any wrongful act or any negligent act or omission to act on the part of the Property Owner or of agents, employees, or independent contractors directly responsible to the Property Owner, providing further that the foregoing shall apply to any wrongful acts, or any actively or passively negligent acts or omissions to act, committed • jointly or concurrently by the Applicant, the Property Owner's agents, employees, or February 11,2003 Tract Map 2479 Agreement Page 5 of 10 UE ` Q tk�v, ITEM NUMBER: A-8 DATE: 02/11/2003 independent contractors. Nothing contained in the foregoing indemnity provisions shall be construed to require the Property Owner to indemnify the City against any responsibility or liability in contravention of Section 2782 of the Civil Code. 11. Upon acceptance of the work on behalf of City and recordation of the Notice of Completion, ownership of the improvements constructed pursuant to this Agreement shall vest in City. 12. Sale or other disposition of this property will not relieve Subdivider form the obligations set forth herein. Subdivider agrees to notify City in writing at least 30 days in advance of any actual or pending sale or other disposition of the property. If Subdivider sells the property or any portion of the property within the Subdivision to any other person, Subdivider may request a novation of this Agreement and a substitution of security. Upon approval of the novation and substitution of securities,Subdivider may request a release or reduction of the securities required by this Agreement. Nothing in the novation shall relieve the Subdivider of the obligations under Paragraph 2 for the work or improvement done bySubdivider. 13. All notices required or provided for under this Agreement shall be in writing and delivered in person or sent by mail, postage prepaid and addressed as provided in this section. Notice shall be effective on the date it is delivered in person, or, if mailed, on the date of deposit in the United States Mail. Notices shall be addressed as follows unless a written change of address is filed with City: • City: City of Atascadero 6500 Palma Avenue Atascadero, CA 93422 Subdivider: Kelly Gearhart 6205 Alcantera Atascadero, CA 93422 Surety: Hurst Financial Corporation 7340 Morro Road Atascadero, CA 93422 14. The provisions of this Agreement are severable. If any portion of this Agreement is held invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect unless amended or modified by the mutual consent of the parties. 15. The Recitals to this Agreement are hereby incorporated into the terms of this Agreement. 16. This Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter. All modifications, amendments, or waivers of the terms of this Agreement must be in writing and signed by the appropriate representatives of the parties. In the case of City, the appropriate party shall be the City Manager. February 11,2003 Tract Map 2479 Agreement Page 6 of 10 t� '19 ITEM NUMBER: A-8 • DATE: 02/11/2003 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Property Owner has hereunto set his/her hand and the City has caused these presents to be signed by its duly sworn and authorized officers the day and year first hereinabove written. CITY OF ATASCADERO SUBDIVIDER: By: (Notarize signature) Wade G. McKinney City Manager Attest: Marcia M. Torgerson City Clerk Approved as to content: • Steven B. Kahn, P.E. City E ng ineer Approved as to form: Roy A Hanley City Attorney • February 11,2003 Tract Map 2479 Agreement Page 7 of 10 8 0 ITEM NUMBER: A-8 DATE: 02/11/2003 Exhibit A • �I RTC Joe NO. 02-018 Esltneb Date: 1 tNN2002 7400!lri oad Pr*d Pdrwpar. Fans TMr ww Atescadem,Ca 93422 PrgW Manager. Ken Cheow Ph(806)482-1375 Fax(805)482-2124 3200 EL CAMINO REAL,TRACT 2479-Atascadero,Ca. Opinion of Probable Construction Cost CONSTRUCTION OF OFF-SITE STREET IMPROVEMENTS DEMOLMON AND EARTHWORK 1 SawcutlRemove/Die ose AC Pavement 0.35 1700 SF 595 2 Remove&D Tree 8-12"diameter 220 4 EA 8 80 3 Remove&Dispose Tree 0 B"diameter) 300 2 EA 600 4 Remove 12"slam drain 8 80 LF 840 5 Cut 1 100 CY 100 6 FM 5 2000 CY lodba 7 Clear and Grub 2 28000 SF 52 DEMOUTION SU&TOTAL 64815 TOTAL DEMOLITION AND EARTHWORK $ 64,815.00 SEWER 1 lConned to ExlatWQ Swi&y Sewer System 200 1 EA 260-0 2 2"FORCE MAIN 10 2340 LF 23400 3 8"PVC Sankary Sewer 25 15 LF 375 4 Sanitary Sewer Manhois 3000 1 EA 3000 5 Traffic Control for LsLmet name 2000 1 LS 2000 SEWER SUB-TOTAL 3077 WATER 1 Connect to Existing Water§y0m 11,000 1 EA 1 11000 2 Flre Hydrant Assam with Reflectors 2000 1 EA 1 2000 3 Water tine T &Sterftation 2 400 LF Boo 4 Water Meter 314"lateral,meter,box etc 2,000 10 EA 20000 5 water Gate valve 1 EA 800 6 64nch Wit 0900 CL150 26 400 LF 10400 7 17hrust BbCks 1 5001 1 EA WATER SUB-TOTAL 45300 STORM ORAIN 1 lConnect to Ex'ngN Storm Drain System 1000 1 EA 1660- 2 8"HDPE-Sure LOK 10 125 LF 1250 3 10 HDPE-Sure LOK 12 75 LF 900 4 12"HDPE-Sure LOK 20 155 LF 31001 S 18"HDPE-Sure LOK 30 290 LF 87 6 24'HDPE-Sure LOK 60 375 LF 22 7 18" 0 1 LF 01 8 Sturm Drain Manhole 30001 1 EA 3000-1 9 131orm Drain Junction Box 1 20001i FA 20 • February 11,2003 [['�;}�� Tract Map 2479 Agreement Page 8 of 10 V v 1 ITEM NUMBER: A-8 DATE: 02/11/2003 RTC JOB NO. 02.018 EtUnwe Ova: 11114/2002 7400 Prciact PrftlpW: Ruga Tr-rps- AtasCadem,Ca 93422 I'Mied M-90r: lean CrA= Ph(905)462-1375 Fax(805)462-2124 3200 EL CAMINO REAL,TRACT 2478-Atescadero,Ca. Opinion of Probable Construction Cost CONSTRUCTION OF OFF-SITE STREET IMPROVEMENTS ' 10 Storm Dtain inlet 2000 4 EA 11 R Ra 250 2 CY 500 STORM DRAIN SUB-TOTAL 60950 GAS,ELECTRIC,TELEPHONE&CABLE 1 Joint Trench 10 575 LF 5750 2 Relocate Utility Pole 5000 2 EA 10000 3 Gas Main 9 575 LF 517 4 Street Lights with Conduit&PkA Boxes 700 3 EA 2106 GAS,ELECTRIC,TELEPHONE,&CABLE SUB-TOTAL 23025 TOTAL UNDERGROUND IMPROVEMENTS L$-150,050.001 I CONCRETE 1 Curb&Cutter 6" 12 950 LF 11400 • 2 Wheelchair Ramp 500 2 EA 1000 3 DrtYeAPPMCh 6 750 SF 4500 4 ConOreta Sidews& 4 5000 SF 20000 5 Paint Curb Red 0.50 310 SF 155 CONCRETE SUBTOTAL 37055 GRADING AND PAVING 1 Grading&Roadway Sub rade P 0.25 25850 SF 6462. 2 3"AC Pavement over 8'CI 11 AB over 12"Subi 3 19950 SF 498751 3 AC PavemenVOvertay 2 4200 SF 8400 4 Class II Base Com 1 500 CY 560- 5 Seal Coat 0.10 19950 SF 199 GRADING AND PAVING SUS-TOTAL 67232. SIGNING AND STRIPING 1 1pavement Marking 1 1 '181 LF I1 2 iStreetSign WISTOP SIGN 300 1 EA300 SIGNING&STRIPING SUB-TOTAL 18 LANDSCAPING 1 Street Trees,Landscaping&fieri aWn 1 5000 1 SF LANDSCAPING SUB-TOTAL • February 11,2003 Tract Map 2479 Agreement Page 9 of 10 082 ITEM NUMBER: A-8 DATE: 02/11/2003 i RTC"N0. 4 41t1 ~ Estl�natet3aa: fft34/1D02 7400 Morro Road PMI"Prmoipal: RuasThdmpson Atescedero,Ce 83422 Pmjed Menaoer: wen Chawn Ph @M 482-1375 Fax(805)482-2124 3204 EL CAMINO REAL,TRACT 2479-Atawadero,Co. Opinion of Probable Construction Coat CONSTRUCTION OF OFF-SITE STREET IMPROVEMENTS MISCELLANEOUS 1 Street Monuments 5WI 21 EA 1 1 2 lErosion Control Measures 5,000 11 1.S MISCELLANEOUS SUB-TOTAL 80 TOTAL SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS 1 $ 115,305.50 TOTAL $330,170.50 IS%Contingency $ 49,523.58 SUBTOTAL $ 379,696.08 5%Field Engineering $ 18,984 80 • TOTAL 1$398,680.88 GEtI�4�'tre e t. IM 0044 of Probable CmMkWAon Cosi EsWnate IS PMkT*ary.it In based upon the conatrpa8on t for Tract 1471 prapwW by R ThmVm Ca wfto dobd November 1,200.2. 2 Ail mea we bred Won aslant pMms Wfth%A 00 WQ*I n far"110 n. 3. Th s""mate hr been prep Wed 93 a gWds ae b the opinlan Of IV WObaba CM1WUCll0n C1611 antldrwted for eae prgear.R ThOnpeon Conft&V maker no qty,either 9%pM&W Of IRIPw "t the aduaf aosb WIF not vary firm the amouMa 6-acabed s'd ywntes no UablRy for such vwlanms. 4. TNs asifma0s does wk k ckxilc a. ts+ u wW Muevad, ,Pw$*-& Umny tat«an. QFESSr nk pW fees. CJPBY..Canetdan0 ane C0"rwAC or fees. Q�S��S• ng tP a 0 m r PE N0.C43069 Russel S.Thompson,Date EXP 3-31.04 Registered Exp.3-31-04 l i t� 0 sr CIVIL 9rE OF C • February 11,2003 Tract Map 2479 Agreement Page 10 of 10 �tia ITEM NUMBER: A-9 DATE: 02/11/2003 I all 1818 1979 Atascadero City Council Staff Report - Community Development Department Zone Change 2002-0037 Code Text Amendment of Planned Development #11 (3F Meadows Fire Protection Standards) (Castlerock Development) RECOMMENDATION: Council adopt, on second reading by title only, the draft Ordinance amending the fire protection standards of Planned Development#11. DISCUSSION: Background: The original 3-F Meadows Ranch project was approved by the City Council in February of 1995 and allowed for the reconfiguration of 115 Atascadero Colony Lots within an 802-acre site. The project resulted in the reconfiguration of 111 existing residential lots on approximately 546 acres with three open space lots totaling approximately 256 acres and one remaining lot for a future water tank to serve the project. The project approval allowed for the phased construction of improvements and lot development. Approval of the 3F Meadows project included a Planned Development overlay rezone to PD-1 to Since the overall project was a lot line adjustment, which allows for only limited conditioning, most of the project conditions were incorporated into PD-11. Section 9-3.656(b) of PD-11 deals exclusively with Fire Department fire protection standards (refer to Attachment 3). The Fire Protection standards were specifically written to address fire protection standards at project completion but did not address interim measures during the construction phase. The proposed text amendment has been reviewed by the Fire Chief and would provide the ability to approve interim fire protection plans. Proposed changes to the Planned Development text are shown with a double underline and rtT-ike The City Council held a public hearing on January 14, 2003 where the proposed ordinance was • introduced for first reading. U t . 3F Meadows . t a • Ig: #���� ���+�h1� �- �,.t► L �Iji + 7 �+5 ♦ �' �vf $ Burk o'0" tom , rrs A � �I • s*♦Ill ••� I a l k1 rrl,r���♦ �lY1'�' �1�ji� �s+`—��'♦1 �..* aY+ � � sij� jI 1 fs rl,,ffirrrr . N t !i`j?=i IN }j sr fry f rf l�F�r' 7 � � �;S'/'`'���i�i a a"•��i ;, ✓ s _ a 1�rfr;'•rr'. }1'1.1-1". �� ,i4' *slit�u��� � 'frr �{:rf rx'v�}y 1�� f� r�1F� � �Illis ����* _ ��•'�` •.rry'fi L'�s .y fi .r'�'{{ fr�f i�lsl.1�► -..a s�l:-ii. E) +/11-S•1 - 1.,,11�r: Ir i �4 +s l�r�+AL 1 `r •y 3, \\�1.y:u1yti1��:rr 1;{� �$ 'IMAX •1R i 1;y \ vti'.' J' }f t•••.'1}'Yr �?. } ¢ .t.� `l�Fx � 1 1:1 •1Y1.1 �` ♦*,/ ��_h � s���� °� ` ., r ��1.~1{.51�v '`rf�rr �� .k•'~.�.s,f'rL:r� !. � � i �j' � '- P t'i f ��ti��;�� _� .1.1s1`.�`.1 "-.•,,•y rrr��J; ttt y 3a{s 11 --y # �\•. •'.i1Yh'Uv •':a�•, / T g��� s •a �� �J)�yj�I T 1�7t11# $ Mal, gVS .a-y`♦ On. t G t f1 { tiff• g��� pr�7a�i~ �> FSWNIN INS& 00 �q,4_ , �,�,, ��'� •"� Vii! if #� � WrWl Morro Road W4WA . 1 Ali® Attachment 2: Draft Ordinance • ZCH 2002-0037 DRAFT ORDINANCE A AN ORDINANCE OF THE ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL APPROVING ZONE CHANGE 2002-0037 AMENDING THE FIRE PROTECTION STANDARDS OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 11 /3F MEADOWS ZCH 2002-0037: Code Text Amendment of Planned Development#11 (3F Meadows Fire Protection Standards) WHEREAS, an application has been received from Castlerock Development, 202 H3 Tank Farm Road, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 (Applicant) and K&M Holding Corporation, 1225 Watercress Way, Arroyo Grande, CA 93420 (Owner), to consider an amendment to Section 9- 3.656(b) of Planned Development#11 fire protection standards also known as 3F Meadows; and, WHEREAS,the site's General Plan Designation is RE (Rural Estates); and, • WHEREAS, the site's zoning district is RS/PD-11 (Residential Suburban with a Planned Development overlay#11); and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to enact this amendment to the Zoning Code Text to protect the health, safety and welfare of its citizens by applying orderly development of the City; and, WHEREAS, the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and public notice of environmental documents, as set forth in the State and local guidelines for implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) have been adhered to; and, WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed Public Hearing upon the subject Zone Change application was held by the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero at which hearing evidence, oral and documentary, was admitted on behalf of said zoning amendments; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, at a Public Hearing held on January 7, 2003, studied and considered Zone Change 2002-0037 recommended Council approval, and, • WHEREAS, the Atascadero City Council, at a Public Hearing held on January 14, 2003, • studied and considered Zone Change 2002-0037, after first studying and considering the Planning Commission recommendation for the project, and, NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council takes the following actions: SECTION 1. FINDINGS FOR STATUTORY EXEMPTION TO CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT 1. Consistent with Section 15061(b)(3) of the California Environmental Quality Act the Council finds that the proposed project has no potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. SECTION 2. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF A ZONE CHANGE AMENDING PD-11. The City Council finds as follows: 1. Amendment of development standards for PD-11 is warranted to promote the orderly development of the project. SECTION 3. APPROVAL. The Atascadero City Council, in a regular session assembled on January 14, 2003, resolved to introduce for first reading an ordinance that would amend PD-11 as follows: Section 9-3.656(b) Fire Department. (1) Water Supply. (i) Prior to final occupancy release by the City, the T- a minimum required fire flow is shall be one thousand (1000) gallons per minute at twenty (20) psi residual pressure for a one-hundred-twenty (120) minute duration in residential development, or as approved by the Fire Chief. The required fire flow will increase, as provided in UFC Appendix III-A, based on square feet of residential construction, with a fifty percent (50%) fire flow credit for automatic sprinkler systems. Verification must be provided from water company or fire department records in established areas or by a proof of design test at the completion of new on-site water main construction. Homes designated strictly as model homes and/or sales offices, but with no residential occupancy, shall be granted exemption from the required fire flow as approved by the Fire Chief. (ii) Underground fire service mains and appurtenances shall conform to NFPA 24 minimum standard and plans are reviewed by the Fire Department prior to installation. The underground main size shall be a minimum of eight (8) inch diameter. WateF rnRsand fiFe hydFaRtS will be iRstalled and-iR seWia prier + • If combustible building materials are used, shall nor install by the Ciro d-eSa������e�-teSt2d;-f1k�StFE'd--afld--a�pf$�/ed—p-y�T�—,-„z 688 supply systems feF phased GGR6tFUGti 3vide the FequiFed fiFe flow at �-11 • phases. a temporary onsite water tank with an approved Fire Department connection shall be installed prior to any stockpiling or installing any combustible materials. (iii) Fire Hydrants. The minimum number and distribution of fire hydrants is one (1) hydrant every five hundred (500) feet as provided in UFC Appendix III-B. The fire hydrant will be Atascadero Mutual Water Company specification with one four and one-half (41/2) inch and one or more two and one-half (21/2) inch outlets. Existing hydrants may be adequate, provided they consist of a minimum of one four and one-half (41/2) inch and one two and one-half (21/2) inch outlet. New hydrant color will be Safety Yellow for public right-of-way and Safety Red for private right-of-way. All hydrants in the public right-of-way to have "Blue Dot" highway reflector installed on the adjacent street of driveway to clearly identify the fire hydrant location. (iv) The dwellings shall be equipped with a residential automatic fire sprinkler system. The sprinkler system will be designed and installed according to NFPA Pamphlet No. 1 3D. The fire department requires a minimum one (1) inch water meter for residential sprinkler systems. (2) Fire Apparatus Access. • (i) If combustible construction materials are used, all required public access roadways shall be completed to a minimum width of twenty (20) feet, or as described in subsections (a.) and (b.) below. capable of supporting forty thousand (40,000) pounds, with an all-weather surface, to within one hundred fifty (150) feet of all stockpiles and all sides of buildings with combustible construction. The access roadways to be posted "No Stopping/Fire Lane" and shall not be used for the storage of materials. Proposed private roads, driveways or extensions of existing roads shall be designed and constructed as follows: a. Single-family residential access road. A vehicular access to more than one parcel or vehicular access to a single parcel with more than two (2) buildings or more than three (3) dwelling units shall be twelve (12) feet width for one-way traffic and sixteen (16) feet width for two-way traffic. The road shall also provide for a ten (10) foot fuel modification area on each side. b. Driveway. A vehicular access to a single parcel with one (1) or two (2) buildings, having no more than three (3) dwelling units on a single parcel and any number of accessory buildings. ;Length Required Width 0--49 feet 12 feet 50--99 feet ._................._'14 feet ...._.._._...._..._._.__................._._......................._.._......... • `Greater than 200 feet 16 feet(Note 1 and Note 2) iNOTE: 1. For driveways exceeding three hundred (300) feet, turnaround shall be provided at the building site and must be within fifty (50) feet of the dwelling. 2. For driveway exceeding eight hundred (800) feet, a turnout shall be provided at the midpoint or every four hundred (400) feet. (ii) Fire apparatus access roads shall have an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13) feet and six (6) inches. Driveways shall have not less than fifteen (15) feet of vertical clearance. (iii) Fire apparatus access roads and driveways shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of forty thousand (40,000) pounds at twenty-five (25) miles per hour, and shall be provided with a surface so as to provide all-weather driving capabilities. (iv) The turning radius of a fire apparatus access road shall have a horizontal inside radius curvature of not less than twenty-eight (28) feet inside radius and forty-eight (48) feet outside radius. (v) All dead-end fire apparatus access roads in excess of one hundred fifty (150) feet in length shall be provided with approved provisions for turning around of fire . apparatus. The bulb or cul-de-sac radius shall not be less than forty (40) feet. The hammerhead T shall extend a minimum of thirty (30) feet to each side of the centerline of the entry road and be eighteen (18) feet wide. The turnaround shall extend forty (40) feet from the entry road and be a minimum of eighteen (18) feet wide. Where parcels are zoned five (5) acres or larger, turnarounds shall be provided at intervals of approximately one thousand three hundred twenty (1,320) feet, or as approved by the Fire Chief. Each dead-end road shall have a turnaround constructed at its terminus. (vi) The minimum level of improvement is determined by the grade of the access road or driveway providing access from the road to the building site or parking area as follows (UFC 10.204): ;Surface :Minimum Grade ?All-Weather ;less than 12 percent ;Nonskid (Note 1) 12 percent to 16 percent ;Nonskid (Note 2) over 16 percent Note 1. Surface shall be asphalt or concrete in the City of Atascadero Engineering Standard Specifications and Drawings including a nonskid finish (brushed concrete or equivalent pavement). • ;jU Note 2. A driveway/access road that would provide a grade greater than sixteen percent (16%) and less than twenty percent (20%) and is • designed by a Registered Civil Engineer may be considered on a case-by- case basis by the Fire Chief. (vii) The maximum length of dead-end road, including all dead-end roads accessed from the dead-end roads, shall use the following cumulative lengths as a guideline for approval by the Fire Chief, regardless of the number of parcels served: ..... . .................. ......... .. :Parcels less than 1 acre 800 feet ;Parcels 1 ac. to 4.66 ac. 1320 feet jParcels 5 ac. to 19.99 ac. 2640 feet ..... ....___ . ............. ... Parcels 20 + ac 5290 feet All lengths shall be measured from the edge of the roadway surface at the intersection that begins from the road to the end of the dead-end road surface at its farthest point. Where a dead-end road crosses areas of differing zones, the shortest allowable length shall apply. (3) Fuel Management. All parcels shall comply with the fire department's wildland fuel management program. The hazardous vegetation that the program is concerned with is seasonal and recurrent in nature. Therefore, the operation of the program is planned on • a continuous annual basis. • • SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be effective a 12:01 a.m. on the 31St day after its final passage. On motion by Council Member , and seconded by Council Member the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ADOPTED: By: • Jerry L. Clay, Sr., Mayor Attest: Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk Approved as to form: Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney • ITEM NUMBER: A- 10 DATE: 02/11/2003 Isla 1 8 • A C" Atascadero City Council Staff Report - Public Works Department 2002-2003 Annual Overlay Program Bid No. 2002-007 RECOMMENDATIONS: Council: 1. Authorize Contract Change Order for $6,000 to Pavement Engineering, Inc. for Inspection services. 2. Authorize Final Payment to Pavement Engineering, Inc. for Design and Inspection services. • DISCUSSION: On February 12, 2002, Council awarded a contract with Pavement Engineering, Inc. (PEI) for $133,575. Of this amount, $96,590 was for plans, specifications and estimates (PS&E), and $36,985 was for pavement inspection services. The inspection services included paving inspection, compaction testing, gauge correlation and asphalt mix tests. PS&E was completed on budget. In the original staff report, the following table of design and inspection services was included: EXPENDITURES Design Services $96,590 Construction Services (Pavement Inspection, Compaction Testing, Gauge $36,985 Correlation,Asphalt Mix Tests) Construction Staking and Surveying $10,000 Inspection (Provided by Teorary Part-time Eloyee) $50,000 m m • TOTAL PROJECT EXPENDITURES $193,575 u93 ITEM NUMBER: A- 10 DATE: 02/11/2003 When the original staff report was completed, it was anticipated that the City would hire a part- time employee to provide project inspection; however, this did not occur. Staff asked Pavement • Engineering, Inc. for a proposal to provide the additional Inspection Services. On September 24, 2002, staff recommended, and the City Manager approved, a Contract Change Order in the amount of $25,000 for this work. This was less than a 20% aggregate change in the contract price, which is allowed by the purchasing policy. During the course of the project, Staff required additional inspection services. This was due to sections of street being added and removed from the construction contract. This $6,000 Contract Change Order is for these services. The total amount billed by Pavement Engineering, Inc. is $163,748.50, which exceeds Contract and Contract Change Order No. 1 by$5,173.50. FISCAL IMPACT: EXPENDITURES Original Budgeted Amount $193,575 Original Contract (PEI) -$133,575 CCO No. 1 (PEI) -$25,000 • CCO No.2 (PEI) -$6,000 AMOUNT REMAINING (Staff time not included) $29,000 ALTERNATIVES: 1. Authorize Contract Change Order 2. Do not Authorize Contract Change Order—Inspection work has already been completed. ATTACHMENT: Contract Change Order No. 2 City of Atascadero ;n 'ri I CHANGE ORDER • i9Ya � �$7a -J7 Purchase Order#00043 � CA" Subject: 2002-2003 Annual Overlay Program Change Order Number: No. 2 Change Order Date: 2/11/2003 Vendor: Pavement Engineering, Inc. Purpose of Change Order: Provide additional inspection services for the 2002-2003 Annual Overlay Program due to streets being added and removed from the original contract. • Units Price A. Original Purchase Order 133,575.00 B. Previous Change Orders 25,000.00 C. Purchase Order prior to this Change Order (A + B) - 158,575.00 D. Net Increase (decrease) of this Change Order 6,000.00 E. Revised Purchase Order with all approved changes (C + D) - 164,575.00 Recommended: Approved: by: by: Requestee City Manager • ITEM NUMBER: A-11 DATE: 02/11/2003 1918 ■ 19 9 Atascadero City Council Staff Report - Community Development Department Acceptance of Proposals For Contract Plan Check Services Bid No. 2002-010 RECOMMENDATION: Council establish eligibility list and award contracts for plan check services to California Code Check, Esgil Corporation, and Mike Whitaker. Recommended for acceptance: • California Code Check 1015 Nipomo Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93422 Esgil Corporation 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 San Diego, CA 92123 Michael Whitaker 650 Woodbridge San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 (Residential Plan Check only) DISCUSSION: The City of Atascadero is responsible for enforcement of the California Code of Regulations (Title 24) as are all jurisdictions in the state of California. These provisions of the California Code of Regulations deal primarily with Public Health and Life Safety issues. Enforcement of these laws in the City of Atascadero is the responsibility of the City of Atascadero Building Services Division. Two chief components of the Building Division's responsibilities involve Plan Review and • Building Inspection. Two members of staff, the Building Official and the Plans G6 ITEM NUMBER: A-11 DATE: 02/11/2003 Examiner/Inspector, perform plan review in-house. The Plans Examiner/Inspector is responsible for both the bulk of the plan review required in the City and also assumes a backup role for the • City's one full-time field building inspector. The Plans Examiner/Inspector position was established to allow flexibility in dealing with the cyclical nature of building activity in Atascadero. During the recent high rate of building activity, Atascadero, as are many jurisdictions has turned to the private sector for help in handling the high volume of plan reviews associated with it. The City has used outside contract plan check services intermittently over the past several years. Award of the bid will establish a list, or pool, of qualified plan review services the City may turn to on an as-needed basis. It is staff's intention to use California Code Check as the primary plan check consultant to ensure consistency in plan check corrections and timeframe turnarounds. Staff may rotate work between ESGIL and Whitaker based on special needs and time constraint issues. FISCAL IMPACT: Plan check contract will exceed $25,000 per year. Cost is paid for by the building plan check fee, which is collected at time of permit submittal. • ATTACHMENTS: 1. Analysis Matrix and Recommendation of the Building Official 2. Request for Proposals 697 ITEM NUMBER: A-11 DATE: 02/11/2003 Attachment 1: Analysis Matrix and Recommendation of the Building Official 23 January, 2003 Re: Bid No. 2002-010 (Outside Plan Checking) Analysis Matrix Rating System Weighting A= Excellent (5 pts.) A= Extremely Important (5) B=Above Average (4 pts.) B =Very Important (4) C=Average (3 pts.) C =Average Importance (3) D= Below Average (2 pts.) D= Below Average Imp. (2) F= Failing/Unacceptable (0 pts.) F =Very Little Imp. (1) Weighting Qualification Criteria JAS Estill CA Whi#aker`(2) .m Cd`chk Y 4 Ex erience, Background, Certifications 1 x4=16 x4=16 x3=12 3 Capacity for workload, Support Staff, (1) x4=12 x4=12 x2=6 Turnover Time 4 Availibility, Ability to Coordinate well w/City (1) x3=12 x4=16 x3=12 Staff 3 Liability Insurance, Length of time in (1) x4=12 x4=12 x2=6 • industry 5 Knowledge of Local Conditions, Physical (1) x3=15 x5=25 x4=15 Location 3 Direct Cost as percentage of Plan Check (1) x4=12 x2=6 x3=9 Fee TOTALS N/A 79 87 60 1) JAS Pacific, Inc. submitted their proposal after the deadline. Also, they do not provide a true 'outside' plan check service. Instead, they provide'temporary' staff which they subcontract to the jurisdiction. The temporary staff they provide actually work in-house (in our facility), so would require'support' and space as would be required for additional staff we might hire. While it may be an approach we may want to explore on its own merits, I didn't feel this arrangement was in-line with what we envisioned when we prepared the RFP. Therefore, I did not consider it on par with the other received proposals. However, they are the only firm that listed contract inspection services in their proposal. We may find benefit in pre-qualifying them for this type of service, as we may have a need for this at some point in the future. 2) Mike Whitaker wants to be considered for residential plan check only Conclusion/Recommendations: • Prequalify CA Codecheck and EsGil for both Commercial and Residential plan check services • Prequalify Mike Whitaker for Residential plan check services (Residential only) • Prequalify JAS Pacific, Inc. for contract Inspection services (only) Respectfully submitted, Eric Hagen fmailto:eha-genCcDatascadero.orqI Building Official/Fire Marshal ITEM NUMBER: A-11 DATE: 02/11/2003 Attachment 2: Request for Proposal • REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS Contract Plan Check Services City of Atascadero Building Services Bid Number 2002-010 GENERAL The City of Atascadero (the City) is requesting proposals from qualified firms or individuals for contracted Plan Review Services for the fiscal years ending June 30, 2003 through 2008. Plan Checks are to be performed in accordance with the State of California Code of Regulations and City Municipal Code. There is no expressed or implied obligation for the City to reimburse responding firms for any expenses incurred in preparing proposals in response to this request. • To be considered the SEALED PROPOSAL must be received by the City Clerk of the City of Atascadero at the City Clerk's Office at 6500 Palma Avenue, Room 311, Atascadero, California, 93422, by Wednesday, January 15th, 2003, at 10:00 a.m. The City reserves the right to reject any or all proposals submitted. During the evaluation process the City reserves the right, where it may serve the City's best interest, to request additional information or clarifications from proposers, or to allow corrections of errors or omissions. At the discretion of the City, firms submitting proposals may be requested to make oral presentations as part of the valuation process. The City reserves the right to retain all proposals submitted and to use any ideas in a proposal regardless of whether that proposal is selected. Submission of a proposal indicates acceptance by the firm of the conditions contained in this request for proposals, unless clearly and specifically noted in the proposal submitted and confirmed in the contract between the City and the firm selected. The City may use more than one firm or individual to complete this work. It is the City's intent to pre- qualify several individuals or firms to be placed on an approved pre-qualified list and have the option of using any at a given time. This affords the City the maximum amount of flexibility to assure the work is completed in a timely manner and at a high quality. There is no maximum number of firms the City may place on the list. It is anticipated the pre-qualification list will be completed January. • ITEM NUMBER: A-11 DATE: 02/11/2003 • Term of Engagement Once pre-qualified, a firm or individual will remain on the list through the fiscal year ending June 30, 2008. Under the provisions of the City Purchasing Policy, an agreement entered into based on an awarded proposal may include annual renewal provisions for up to five years. SCOPE OF WORK TO BE PERFORMED The City desires the Contractor to evaluate the Plans in the conformity with State and Local Regulations. The work may involve both residential and commercial buildings of varying size and scale. Levels of services include the following: • Full Review(a review of all aspects of the project), • Building Review(a review of the proposed structure only, exclusive of the site-related aspects of the project), and • Structural Engineering Review(a review of the structural design of the proposed project only) Review of public improvements or city-owned capital improvements are not to be considered as part of this proposal. The Contractor is expected to coordinate with the Permit Technician, Plans Examiner/Inspector, and Building Official/Fire Marshal to prepare reviews consistent with those performed by City personnel. It is anticipated there will be variation in Plan Reviews and understood the outside agency is under no obligation to add or omit items based on City staff input which they consider necessary to a proper review. However, it is considered advantageous and in the City's best interest if a certain level of consistency can be achieved through proper coordination. Examples of this are working from the same or similar'generic' plan review lists, making careful study of local ordinances and conditions, and self- monitoring on an on-going basis by comparing the product with plan reviews the City performs on projects • of similar scale. Provide a brief description of how your firm is qualified to provide this type of support. The Contractor is also expected to prepare monthly reports summarizing activity for that month. There is no specified minimum or maximum amount of Plan Reviews associated with this proposal. The volume of project will vary, based on demand for permits and City personnel availability. DESCRIPTION OF THE CITY Background Information The City, incorporated in 1979, has a population of approximately 26,000. The City is a general law City and operates under the City Council/City Manager form of government. The City is located approximately 20 miles north of San Luis Obispo in the County of San Luis Obispo. The City's fiscal year begins on July I and ends on June 30. Plan review by the Building Services Division of the City is performed primarily by a Plans Examiner/Inspector, who also performs field inspections as required according to demand, and by the Building Official/Fire Marshal, who performs a limited number of both plan reviews and field inspections for projects of a specialized nature or in their early development stages, when impacts on City infrastructure require examination. A full-time Permit Technician with the support of a Plans Examiner/Inspector performs distribution of documents for plan review. The fluctuating demand for permits causes the City to seek outside contractors to perform Plan Checks during the heavy demand periods. 100 ITEM NUMBER: A-11 DATE: 02/11/2003 Current Plan Check Software • The City does not currently use a commercially available plan review software. Correspondence is performed using the latest version of Microsoft Word. ASSISTANCE TO BE PROVIDED TO THE CONTRACTOR The City of Atascadero agrees to the following: • Comply with all reasonable requests of Contractor necessary to the performance of Contractor's duties under this agreement, • Maintain clear records of work performed by the Contractor within the City's guidelines for maintenance of Building Records and archiving, • Present invoices or work orders to the City's financial officer in a timely manner upon presentation by the Contractor, PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS General Requirements The following material is required to be received by January 15th 2003, at 10:00 a.m., for a proposing firm or individual to be considered: Title Page Title page showing the request for proposals' subject; the firm's name; the name, address and telephone number of the contact person; and the date of the proposal • Transmittal Letter A signed letter of transmittal briefly stating the proposer's understanding of the work to be done, the commitment to perform the work within the time period, and a statement why the firm believes itself to be best qualified to perform the services. Detailed Proposal The detailed proposal should follow the order set forth below in Section V, B, of this request for proposals. Submittal Proposers should forward completed proposals in a SEALED ENVELOPE. The outside of the envelope shall indicate: ■ Name and address of contractor ■ Name of project on which proposal is submitted ■ Date and time of proposal opening Completed proposals shall be received by January 15th, 2003, at 10:00 a.m, at the following address: City of Atascadero City Clerk's Office , 10 ITEM NUMBER: A-11 DATE: 02/11/2003 6500 Palma Avenue, Room 311 Atascadero, California, 93422 Bid Opening Bids will be opened Monday, January 15th, 2003, at 10:00 a.m. at the following address: City of Atascadero City Clerk's Office 6500 Palma Avenue, Room 311 Atascadero, California, 93422 Technical Proposal General Requirements The purpose of the Technical Proposal is to demonstrate the qualifications, competence and capacity of the firms seeking to Review Plans in conformity with the requirements of this request for proposals. As such, the substance of the proposals will carry more weight than their form or manner of presentation. The Technical Proposal should demonstrate the qualifications of the firm and of the particular staff to be assigned to the Plan Reviews. It should also specify an approach that will meet the request for proposal's requirements. • The Technical Proposal should address all the points outlined in the request for proposals. The proposal should be prepared simply and economically, providing a straightforward, concise description of the proposer's capabilities to satisfy the requirements of the request for proposals. Other Information Proposals must also include the following items: • General background of the firm, available resources, and range of services. • Portion of contract to be performed by subcontractors and subcontractor qualifications. Turnaround time frames are to be provided for each of the three different service levels, Full Review, Building Review, and Structural Engineering Review. • Listing of insurance carried by your firm. • A listing of available references to contact. License to Practice in California An affirmative statement should be included that the firm and all assigned key professional staff are properly licensed to practice in • California. 0� ITEM NUMBER: A-11 DATE: 02/11/2003 Firm Qualifications and Experience The proposer should state the size of the firm and the number and nature of the professional staff to be employed on this project on a full- time basis and the number and nature of the staff to be so employed on a part-time basis. Provide as much information as possible regarding the number, qualifications, experience and training, including relevant continuing professional education, of the specific staff to be assigned to this project. Indicate how the quality of staff over the term of the contract will be assured. If the proposer is a joint venture or consortium, the qualifications of each firm comprising the joint venture or consortium should be separately identified and the firm that is to serve as the primary service provider should be noted, if applicable. Rates The proposal should include a schedule of professional fees and expenses for each of the 6 fiscal years being proposed (fiscal years 2003 through 2008). Out-of-Pocket Expenses Include all estimated out-of-pocket expenses or miscellaneous charges that may be incurred for each of the 6 fiscal years being proposed (fiscal years 2003 through 2008). . City Staff Hours An estimate of the number of "additional" City staff hours required to assist the Plan Reviewers and the tasks to be performed by City staff. Manner of Payment Indicate method and frequency of payments and the address to which payments should be sent. Right to Reject Proposals Submission of a proposal indicates acceptance by the firm of the conditions contained in this request for proposal unless clearly and specifically noted in the proposal submitted and confirmed in the contract between the City and the firm selected. The firm selected will be required to enter into a written contract with the City. A copy of the City's standard contract is attached. The City reserves the right, without prejudice, to reject any or all proposals. INFORMATION REQUESTS All questions regarding this request for proposals are to be directed to the Eric Hagen in the Building Division of the Community Development Department at following contact numbers: Phone: (805)461-5035 . Fax: (805)461-5036 JL ITEM NUMBER: A-11 DATE: 02/11/2003 • Distribution List: CALIFORNIA CODE CHECK ATTN: BRIAN SPAIN 1015 NIPOMO STREET, SUITE 200 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 WILLDAN 2295 GATEWAY OAKS DRIVE, SUITE 140 SACRAMENTO, CA 95833 ESGIL CORPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DRIVE, SUITE 208 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 CODE MASTER BOB FIELDING 21900 ADOBE RD RENO NV. 89511 WHITAKER MIKE WHITAKER 650 WOODBRIDGE SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 • • 5 ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 02/11/2003 Big Be 1918 19 9 Atascadero City Council Staff Report - Community Development Department Zone Change 2002-0031 Conditional Use Permit 2002-0089 Tentative Tract Map 2002-0015 (#2460) 9105 & 9127 San Diego Road (Mehring / Twin Cities Surveys) RECOMMENDATIONS: Planning Commission Recommends: 1. Adopt Draft Resolution A, certifying proposed Negative Declaration 2002-0046 prepared for . Zone Change 2002-0031 and Tentative Tract Map 2002-0015; and, 2. Introduce Draft Ordinance A, for first reading by title only, to approve Zone Change 2002- 0031; and amend the City's Zoning Map to add a PD-16 overlay district to the project area. 3. Adopt Draft Resolution B, approving the Conditional Use Permit 2002-0089, a Master Plan of Development for the project site consistent with PD-16; and, 4. Adopt Draft Resolution C, approving Tentative Tract Map 2002-0015, a request to subdivide a 10-acre and a 4-acre lot into five parcels; three at 2.69 acres, one at 2.93 acres, and one at 3.03 acres, all acreages gross, based on findings and subject to conditions. REPORT-IN-BRIEF: A proposed project consists of a Tentative Tract Map application with a zoning map change to create a Planned Development Overlay Zone. The project would allow a 5-lot subdivision resulting in the following new parcels given in gross acreages: three 2.69-acre parcels, one 2.93- acre parcel, and one 3.03-acre parcel. The purpose of the Planned Development Zoning Overlay is to allow the creative clustering of residential parcels to preserve sensitive environmental features and provide open space easements by allowing lot sizes smaller than the underlying • zone's minimum lot size requirements. The maximum density on the project site will not exceed the maximum density allowed by the underlying General Plan designation and Zoning District. r ITEM NUMBER: B-1 DATE: 02/11/2003 The site has a General Plan Designation of Residential Estates (RE) and a Residential Suburban (RS) Zoning District with a minimum lot size of 2'/2 to 10 acres based on performance criteria • outlined in the Atascadero Municipal Code. The project is proposed on two vacant lots totaling 14.03 acres gross at 9105 & 9127 San Diego Road, Atascadero, CA 93422, San Luis Obispo County(APN: 045-441-035 & 045-441-004). Owner: Will Mehring- Owner and Applicant. Situation and Facts: 1. Applicant: Will Mehring, 11190 Santa Lucia Road, Atascadero, CA 93422 805-466-1011 2. Representative: Twin Cities Surveys, 613 Main Street, Templeton, CA 93465; 805-434-3684 3. Project Address: 9105 & 9127 San Diego Road, Atascadero, CA APN's 045-441-035 & 045-441-004 4. General Plan Designation: Residential Estates (RE) 5. Zoning District: Residential Suburban (RS) with a minimum lot size of 2.66 acres (gross) based on the performance standards calculation) 6. Site Area: 14.47 Acres (gross) 7. Existing Use: Single Family Residences on large lots and open pastures. 8. Environmental Status: Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration 2002-0046 posted November 20, 2002. Site description: The project occurs on two deep lots located on San Diego Road east of the intersection of Atascadero Road and west of the U.S. Highway 101. The project site has frontage on San Diego Road and all lots will take access via private ingress/egress easements on the flag portion of the lot #2. The project site is in a rural agricultural setting surrounded by large lot single-family residences and large open horse corrals. The site currently contains two single- family residences on two separate existing parcels. Project site setting contains portions of flat areas suitable for building sites and portions of slight-to-moderate sloped hillsides. There are clusters of native oak woodlands and non-native tree stands as well. DISCUSSION: Background: Staff and the Planning Commission have reviewed several subdivision applications in the last few years that have resulted in irregular parcel configurations. The subdivision applications have met the lot size requirements of the underlying General Plan and zoning • ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 02/11/2003 districts. However, in order to meet the minimum parcel size requirements, projects have been forced into lot designs with steep building sites, difficult access, driveway designs with excessive grading and tree removals, and irregular shaped lot configurations. In order to address this problem and provide for development that would protect the natural features of a site, the City Council adopted the Planned Development #16 Overlay District that allows clustering of residential development within the single-family zoning districts with no additional density, but with flexible minimum lot sizes to allow for environmentally superior projects and more orderly development. The Atascadero Municipal Code states that the purpose of the Planned Development#16 Overlay Zone is to identify areas where development standards may differ from those established by the underlying zoning district. The deviations from the zoning standards are deemed necessary to promote orderly and harmonious development and to enhance the opportunity to best utilize special characteristics of an area. The planned development can be used on all subdivision applications within the Residential Suburban, Residential Single Family and Limited Single Family zoning districts. The proposed planned development will allow reduced lot sizes, provided the overall density of the site will be required to be consistent with the parcels' General Plan designation. The PD-16 provides a more flexible way to approach subdivision design. This will allow the location of building sites in appropriate areas and will not "force" building sites and driveways onto steep hillsides just to meet the minimum lot size requirements. Additionally, the proposed . planned development will provide a benefit to the surrounding properties, because a requirement of the proposed planned development is that each project provides an open space or tree preservation easement. This will ensure that the rural character of the sites will be maintained. Planned Development Text: Chapter 9-3.660 Atascadero Municipal Code PD-16. The planned development is applicable in the RS, RSF, LSF Zoning Districts: (a) Purpose. The purpose of the district is to allow the creative clustering of residential parcels to preserve sensitive environmental features and provide open space by allowing lot sizes smaller than the underlying zone's minimum lot size requirements in the RS, RSF, LSF Zoning Districts. (b) Development Standards: (1) The maximum density shall not exceed that allowed by the underlying zoning district and General Plan designation. Individual lot sizes may be smaller provided the overall project density conforms to the specified maximum density. (i) Minimum individual lot sizes shall be at least one acre (gross) for parcels served by on-site septic systems and 0.S acre (net)for lots served by the City's sewer system. (2) Lots shall utilize common access when feasible. (3) Open space easements shall be provided for each project. All open space iseasements shall be designated as non-build, non-storage areas on the Final '0e ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 02/11/2003 Parcel / Tract Maps. (Septic systems are allowed to be located within the open • space easements. (4) All building sites within the Planned Development shall be located on slopes under 20 percent. (5) Development on each parcel shall be designed to avoid native tree impacts, preserve the contours of the hills, protect prominent view sheds, maintain wildlife corridors and minimize impacts to significant drainage areas and blue-line creeks. (6) A Master Plan of Development shall be approved in conjunction with any Tentative Tract / Parcel Map application. All subdivision improvements and subsequent development shall be consistent with the Master Plan of Development. The Master Plan of Development shall contain the following: (i) A site plan indicating land use, common open space, circulation, lot sizes, slopes, native trees, building sites and common landscape features. (ii)A statistical summary of the project's land uses and densities; (iii)A statement of project features that will provide a public benefit; (iv) Any special development standards that will be required of future development; (v) Individual building plans and elevations are not required. Analysis: The project proposed for a Planned Development-16 is located at 9105 & 9127 San Diego Road. The applicant originally submitted a Tentative Tract Map with the intent of • minimizing impacts to the site by utilizing an existing paved access road, instead of grading in a new 1600-foot access road over slight-to-moderate slopes and through several oak woodland clusters. The access road was originally proposed to be incorporated into the gross acreage of each individual lot providing enough acreage for a five-lot split. Staff reviewed the project and determined that, according to the city's subdivision ordinance,the design must include a standard flag lot in which the access road would be the flag portion and owned by the lot furthest away from the frontage on San Diego Road. In addition, according to the Atascadero Municipal Code Subdivision Ordinance, the flag portion cannot be included as gross acreage. Because of the size of the access driveway, the subtraction of the flag acreage would not leave enough remaining gross acreage to split the two lots into five parcels. However, the gross acreage of the site, without using the existing paved road, meets and exceeds the acreage needed for five new lots. This would require lot configurations that would require grading and paving a new road not far from where the existing road is located. The Planned Development in this case would allow a lot (#2) to have "net" acreage smaller than the calculated minimum lot size, while not allowing additional density. In addition, the project would minimize impacts to the site associated with grading a new 1600-foot access driveway and would provide a 0.44-acre open space easement, and create an orderly subdivision. All the remaining parcels would be larger than the minimum lot size. The proposed design would comply with the city's subdivision ordinance and the Subdivision Map Act, result in fewer impacts to the site, and preserve an area of open space. • ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 02/11/2003 • Existing Paved Access Drive to become flag for Lot Dirt Road to be #2 and access for - Removed remaining parcels View looking south from the existing residence on Lot 4 towards Lot 5 and San Diego Road. Density: The project's minimum lot size was calculated according to the Atascadero Municipal Code standards for the Residential Suburban Zoning District t�/kl��yG{[Q�Qtg. Viiiill6lftQAi� CT GtlStl�E.; sI sa ? / S$PtZa SSI�t�tH7it� 4 ttt 1 Ult „ F 2tr�.1 Os 2fi tZS a / f F _ # / rbid" '10 l q P3vCd[ dWS,sthut 4D o c F'iued EQ#Q rfmr!Mfa�! SQ w dtutJessth Dy 6 r AM ttetKlf rr�e thane/ }tpp A s / �kkssttwrtW.xt25 i4 +'$sa Goadiuiui edsrwe ikan tYi t5 i -, j t / q- 64, Kv 1 3£ a e �' ` we • r' � ,,,,G�. .,y_-. ��"€M�nfirntmiLatsfi�5`Isa5�2.5tb€'�llcreti�ttlteRt3[dtnt�5ubiutran2'csssf$sY�t Minimum Lot Size Calculation Form �C ITEM NUMBER: B-1 DATE: 02/11/2003 • Total Gross Acreage= 14.47 Acres Minimum Lot Size= 2.66 Acres Allowed Density: 14.47 acres/2.66 acres=5 parcels allowed. The proposed Planned Development would allow no additional density beyond the five new lots allowed by the Zoning Ordinance. Lot #2 is a flag lot that contains the access driveway and it is required to be subtracted from the gross acreage available for the lot split calculation. Lot #2 is smaller than the minimum lot size when the flag acreage is subtracted out. Planned Development Statistical Summary: The Tentative Tract Map requires the following statistical summary. Statistical Summary Table Lot 2 Lo�3 L6t 4F . Lot 5 Parcel Size(gross acres) 3.03 2.73 2.69 2.69 3.37 Parcel Size (net)(1.0 min ) 3.03 2.73-0.84 acre flag=1.89 2.69 2.69 3.37 % Slope: Building Site(under 20%) 0-10% 0-10% 0-10% 0-10% 0-10% Open Space Area(acres) 0 0 0 0 0.44 Minimum Lot Size 2.66 acres Maximum Density Allowed: One SFR per 2.66 acres Total Site Area: 14.47 acres Total Density allowed "14.47/2.66=5.43" Open Space: In order to qualify for a Zone Change to create Planned Development Overlay #16 the project must meet all of the requirements outlined in the Atascadero Municipal Code. This includes a dedication of open space, "Open space easements shall be provided for each project. All open space easements shall be designated as non-build, non-storage areas on the Final Parcel/ Tract Maps. (Septic systems are allowed to be located within the open space easements". The applicant is offering a 0.44-acre dedication of open space that is part of Lot#5. • ITEM NUMBER: B-I DATE: 02/11/2003 fit ~ _ r tlot)ll 1! `11111jti1i1>. � �� I!ll�jj I! x � Ji••-^��� 'tJ%!fit 1;111;��11` Proposed 0.44 ~'-- = -,,• ,11':,- acre Open Space Staff Recommended a Expansion Open Space Proposed vs. Staff Recommended The dedication area is near where the project fronts San Diego Road. The area was strategically chosen to surround an environmentally sensitive area (moderate-to-steeply sloped native oak woodland) and to preserve the rural character of the site from the public • roadway. Staff is recommending the open space easement be expanded to cover the entire frontage of Lot#5. Prnnnsert( nen Snapp Area Hillside area/oak woodland will be protected with an open-space easement • JL ITEM NUMBER: B-1 DATE: 02/11/2003 Subdivision Design: The subdivision will allow the creation of five new parcels. The • project constitutes the subdivision of a deep lot. Subsequently, a flag lot is required that will own the primary access driveway and provide easements for the remaining parcels to access San Diego Road. All lots have building envelopes with slopes under 20 percent occurring outside of native tree drip lines. Percolation tests have been provided for the lots that indicate that the soil is suitable on each lot for on-site septic systems (average 40 minutes/inch). Atascadero Mutual Water Company will provide water to the new residences, and future utilities to the new lot will be required to be placed underground. The area designated for the offer of open space is part of Lot 45 on the Tentative Tract Map and will be recorded on the Final Parcel Map. Future uses of the area in the open space easement area will be limited. Future grading, construction, and/or native tree removal within the easement area will be prohibited. The subdivision is consistent with the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. The General Plan and zoning maps designate the property at 9105 & 9125 San Diego Road for"Single Family Residential" uses. The subdivision is consistent with the proposed Planned Development-16 standards. The minimum lot size calculations require at least 2.66 acres per residence. The site has an overall density of one house per 2.80 acres. The density is consistent with the Residential Estates General Plan designation. The tract map is conditioned that the zone changes must be in place prior to the tentative map approval becoming active. Access: All lots will have access to San Diego Road via an existing paved 20-foot wide • access driveway. The access driveway currently serves four residences. The project is proposing three new single-family residences that will utilize the existing paved access driveway. The access driveway will be the flag portion of Lot #2, which will provide private ingress/egress easements for all parcels to San Diego Road. Existing Hammerhead -__ •:;°�` .,- ,�,,., . X1, 1 Turnaround/New Cul- np.Rar.I nnatinn _ =;ii Existing 1600-Foot \ i' ��, i��/i � - � / —♦ � '%H'—'— ,h i/!!/!/1/11 iTllll\\l \ i Paved Access 1 Driveway .i \ L i ♦ \♦..�'�.'-- —� _ 6 lit\\'k<\ \ ♦ _ ___— ^vs'♦ "TT{x l\�:• ,` ♦ •. .._' ...moi iw�.. ' `4�t _-�.;f-i �+.,�� - --__ �,•� ; S L r+=�t�°'S$r" '",v-rv. ""-rte`,>.. • \ir�-•._ .- - __`' - � -"-Sof'•• __ 'i�,.`�'.� ,''�'%�!':;'y':�� :; }.v/rtf.�__' .t wa"C.„,:. ' �':� �---_���=•�" .: _`;n a�T� w:'�L '.' �'' '�'' F_;.;;.;, ti,,';si'�=. .,�iii. /�; LOT#2: Flag Lot Because the paved access driveway will serve more than five lots, the project requires a cul-de-sac and fire hydrants every 400 feet along the length for fire truck access. The • applicant will utilize the paving and grading of an existing hammerhead turnaround near 12 ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 02/11/2003 the end of the access driveway to lessen impacts associated with grading and paving a cul-de-sac. Public Improvements: The project proposes three new residences that are allowed by zoning. The project's traffic impacts to San Diego Road have been analyzed and thus anticipated under the Circulation Element of the General Plan. The City Engineer has inspected the public right-of-way on the site and is requiring that the project frontage along San Diego Road be upgraded with two inches of asphalt overlay consistent with the Atascadero Municipal Code. The Fire Marshall has reviewed the project and determined that a cul-de-sac and fire hydrants every 400 feet are required for public safety. Environmental Review: The Initial Study concluded that there would be no significant harm to the environment as a result of this subdivision, when mitigation measures are implemented. A proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared for the project and will be certified with the adoption of the draft resolution of approval. Conclusion: The proposed planned development will provide a flexible option for subdivision design that will minimize development impacts. The subdivision will be consistent with the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance once the proposed planned development overlay is approved. The parcel configurations are consistent with the Subdivision Ordinance requirements, and the size and shape of the proposed lots are consistent with the character of the immediate neighborhood. If approved, the project would allow for the construction of three additional single-family residences. FISCAL IMPACT: The project would likely have a slight negative impact on City revenues. As a general rule, single-family dwellings require services that exceed the revenue generated by the dwelling. ALTERNATIVES: 1. City Council may approve the project subject to additional or revised project conditions. The Council's motion to approve needs to include any new or revised project conditions. 2. City Council may deny the project. The parcel would retain its designation of Residential Suburban. • 113 ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 02/11/2003 3. City Council may continue the hearing and refer the item back to staff for additional • information or analysis. Direction should be given to staff and the applicant on required information. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 -- Location Map (General Plan&Zoning) Attachment 2 -- Minimum Lot Size Calculation Attachment 3 -- Draft Resolution A Attachment 4 -- Draft Ordinance A Attachment 5 -- Draft Resolution B Attachment 6 -- Draft Resolution C • • 14 S _ v ; YIf :. The Project . . the Residential Suburban Zone •iu f quo. iiriuuf■ S' +� - ■irruuuu\ S iuuruuuuur uuuur u MU. nuuuuuuf rrruuruutoo ■tuuuuuuft. Project ., vuuuuuu■v ruuuurur vruuuu- _ ■uuurr -- }y _-`� - vorruu rrruuu. •uuuuu rruu■ur S +� - Im BENZENV uouu■ .ate �tuuuf\ - * ruuuu iS v■frrrfr. — . u� ■ffffrfff •ff■■■rrf\ � j ffftfft■■, e� � t i \rrrt■■ff• � 0 L ��; � ` s 1� 4 ITEM NUMBER: B-1 DATE: 02/11/2003 ATTACHMENT 2: Minimum Lot Size Calculations • ZCH 2002-0031/CUP 2002-00891TTM 2002-0015 9105&9127 San Diego Road fthi F q7 10coo r 12 aaa J1.6IG _ T SkSt :Au., mF�s ' � z ' t�ic`an�e f�Qnlr<s 1+F isaaaats to aha sQ y a s 20-33 rrnainch- J Septi uitabli t��' # 59 n iihiih too r (pEk rax ] ;fi0 rrrnntinche i 5a <sa a=1a s tf 2or 75, 21 � 25YX i i1 26 30f -125-` 1�t�erag� lnpe . . 3135 : 1756-#Otaa (assuF�ied �� C. d' r y y y y Pauett rsrad r�±:s tha�i 15� #0 -/� � � 81,20, is Pa4edF�ad mQCe than 15! 50 r E A11404 r I(faCi 15/: 75 r / / `j,11 I dEnE!nF�Shari 15 1 as r ' UhimpCCtYO E than ``z 1.25 1�CDe�S G4(ft�Etl�d �IRn7nprC,11, FYIESFE thdst 15! 5 fi s + tDt" ki ,11 WtC1t ICt�r V it VIM- '�ItTffllt iw►V�E`$et � , �� � �% iyy�� � �� � -y � � r S it a s U _ y « n � %z n '� .� �i "- I�iiniinurrt t:c►t Size Shi`a1C 6e 2.5 t�`1ti acres in"the Ftesidei>fP�t Sttizur�tat�:2aFt�,: '� i� : r ITEM NUMBER: B-1 DATE: 02/11/2003 • ATTACHMENT 3: Draft Resolution A ZCH 2002-0031/CUP 2002-0089/TTM 2002-0015 9105 &9127 San Diego Road DRAFT RESOLUTION A A RESOLUTION OF THE ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL CERTIFYING NEGATIVE DECLARATION 2002-0072 PREPARED FOR ZONE CHANGE 2002-0031, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2002-0089, AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2002-0015 (9105 & 9127 San Diego Road/APN 045-441-035 & 045-441-004/William Mehring) WHEREAS, an application has been received from William Mehring (11190 Santa Lucia Road, Atascadero, CA 93423) Applicant and Property Owner, to allow a zone change from RS (Residential Suburban— minimum lot size 2 '/z to 10 acres) to RS / PD-16 (Residential Suburban — minimum lot size 2 '/2 to 10 acres with Planned Development Overlay 16), the • adoption of a Master Plan of Development, and a five-lot residential Tentative Tract Map on APN 045-441-035 & 045-441-004; and, WHEREAS, an Initial Study and Draft Negative Declaration 2002-0046 were prepared for the project and made available for public review in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA); and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero held a public hearing following the close of the review period for the Initial Study and Draft Negative Declaration to consider its adequacy; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, at a public hearing held on Tuesday, December 17, 2002, resolved to recommend that the City Council certify Negative Declaration 2002-0046; and, NOW, THEREFORE, the Atascadero City Council, at a public hearing held on Tuesday, February 11, 2003, hereby resolves to certify Negative Declaration 2002-0046 based on the following findings as shown on Exhibit A: (a) The Negative Declaration has been completed in compliance with CEQA; and, 117 ITEM NUMBER: B-1 DATE: 02/11/2003 (b) The Negative Declaration was presented to the Planning Commission, and the information contained therein was considered by the Planning Commission, prior to recommending action on the project for which it was prepared; and, (c) The project does not have the potential to create a significant environmental impact; and, (d) The project will not achieve short-term to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals; and, (e) The project does not have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable. (f) The project will not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings either directly or indirectly. On motion by Council Member , and seconded by Council Member the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: • ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ADOPTED: By: Jerry L. Clay, Sr., Mayor Attest: Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk Approved as to form: Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney • IF-1,I mini CITY OF ATASCADERO RF�F��E cin Alf) 2 1918 A �� 1878 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 'k/oc 120OZ . CO��yC/e�w�® CITY OF ATASCADERO NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION SSION PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Atascadero Planning Commission will be holding a public hearing to consider the following project and environmental determination. The public is encouraged to attend. Applicant: William Mehring,11190 Santa Lucia,Atascadero,CA 93422 Project Title: Zone Change 2002-0031/Tentative Tract Map 2002-0015 for the adjustment of 2 lots of record into 5 new parcels. Project 9105&9127 San Diego Road,Atascadero,CA 93422: Location: (San Luis Obispo County)APN 045-441-035&045-441-004 Project A proposed Planned Development Zone Change and Tentative Tract Map to al?ow the adjustment of two legal lots of Description: record into five new parcels.The proposed project would include recordation of a non-buildable 0.44 acre open space area and allow three new 2.69 acre parcels,one 2.93 acre parcel,and one 3.03 acre parcel for sale and/or development. The purpose of the Planned Development Zoning Overlay is to allow the creative clustering of residential parcels to perserve sensitive environmental features and provide open space easements by allowing lot configurations that do not meet the City's zoning standards.The project would preserve an existing access road that occurs over slight-to-moderate • slopes and prevent grading and native tree impacts associated with installing a new 2,800 foot access road.The maximum density on the project site will not exceed the maximum density allowed by the underlying General Plan designation and the respective Zoning District.The proposed new parcels contain non-native grasslands with several native oak woodland stands and foothill pine stands.No native tree removals are required for development of the project. The site will gain access from San Diego Road. Each parcel will utilize an on-site septic system.All other utility services are available.General Plan Designation:Residential Estates(RE)Zoning District: Residential Surburban(RS)2.5-10 acre minimum lot size based on performance standards. Environmental Begins: November 20,2002 Review Dates: Ends: December 9,2002 Hearing Date: December 17,2002 Hearing Atascadero City Hall,7:00 p.m. Location: 6500 Palma Avenue,4`h Floor,Atascadero,CA 93422 Proposed Based on the initial study prepared for the project, a Mitigated Negative Declaration is proposed. The Environmental proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration is available for public review from 11/20/02 through 12/9/02 Determination: at 6500 Palma Avenue,Community Development Department,Room 104,from 8:00 a.m.to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Any inter erson ma vi roposed Negative Declaration and project files. Questions should be direc Glenn Ri a Planner at 461-5033. Warren M.Frace,Community Development Director Date r tae:ZCH zarz-aon;TTM-2002-0013.9105 San Diego RoadMdimg.LSMND,GR Riaz Dale:I MOM 10 59 AM 6500 PALMA AVENUE - ATASCADERO,CALIFORNIA 93422 - (805)461-5035 - FAX 461-5636 .7 FILE COPY City of Atascadero CEQA Referral Request for Comments Community Development Department 6500 Palma Avenue,Atascadero,CA 93422 (805)461-5035 Date: November 20,2002 To: Atascadero Mutual Water Company Atascadero Unified School District California Regional Water Quality Control Board Pacific Bell Pacific Gas and Electric San Luis Obispo Air Pollution Control District Southern California Gas Company Upper Salinas-Las Tablas RCD From: Warren Frace, Community Development Director e I 0 The attached Proposed Mitigated Negative Declartion is referred for your Agency's review and comment. The public review period for this project runs from November 20,2002 through December 9,2002. Mitigated Negative Declaration 2002-0046 and Initial Study • Date Mailed • ,e;$ CITY OF ATASCADERO PROPOSED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION #2002-0046 6500 Palma Avenue Atascadero,CA 93422 805/461-5035 Applicant: William Mehring,11190 Santa Lucia,Atascadero,CA 93422 Project Title: Zone Change 2002-0031/Tentative Tract Map 2002-0015 for the adjustment of 2 lots of record into 5 new parcels. Project 9105&9127 San Diego Road,Atascadero,CA 93422: Location: (San Luis Obispo County)APN 045-441-035&045-441-004 Project A proposed Planned Development Zone Change and Tentative Tract Map to allow the adjustment of two legal lots of Description: record into five new parcels.The proposed project would include recordation of a non-buildable 0.44 acre open space area and allow three new 2.69 acre parcels,one 2.93 acre parcel,and one 3.03 acre parcel for sale and/or development. The purpose of the Planned Development Zoning Overlay is to allow the creative clustering of residential parcels to perserve sensitive environmental features and provide open space easements by allowing lot configurations that do not meet the City's zoning standards.The project would preserve an existing access road that occurs over slight-to-moderate slopes and prevent grading and native tree impacts associated with installing a new 2,800 foot access road.The maximum density on the project site will not exceed the maximum density allowed by the underlying General Plan designation and the respective Zoning District.The proposed new parcels contain non-native grasslands with several native oak woodland stands and foothill pine stands.No native tree removals are required for development of the project. The site willain access from San Diego Road. Eac g g harcel will utilize an on-site Pseptic system.All other utility services are available.General Plan Designation:Residential Estates(RE)Zoning District: Residential Sur burban(RS)2.5-10 acre minimum lot size based on performance standards. • Findings: 1. The project does not have the potential to degrade the environment. 2. The project will not achieve short-term to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals. 3. The project does not have impacts which are individually limited,but cumulatively considerable. 4. The project will not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings either directly or indirectly. Determination: Based on the above findings,and the information contained in the initial study 2002-0046(made a part hereof by reference and on file in the Community Development Department),it has been determined that the above project will not have an adverse impact on the environment when the following proposed mitigation measures are incorporated into the project(see attachment). Prepared By: Glenn Rider,Associate Planner Date Posted: November 20,2002 Public Review Ends: December 9,2002 Attachments: - Location Map - Site Photos - Proposed Tentative Tract Map - Initial Study 2002-0046 • Fac ZCH 2002-003 I;TCM-2002-00139105 San Diego RoadMdtr6SJSMND.GR Print Du I IROM21039 AM . 21 6500 PALMA AVENUE • ATASCADERO,CALIFORNIA 93422 (805)461-5035 FAX 461-5036 1 IDS 1979 CITY OF ATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM Environmental Review 2002-0046 Applicant: William Mehring,11190 Santa Lucia,Atascadero,CA 93422 Project Title: Zone Change 2002-0031/Tentative Tract Map 2002-0015 for the adjustment of 2 lots of record into 5 new parcels. Project 9105&9127 San Diego Road,Atascadero,CA 93422: Location: (San Luis Obispo County)APN 045-441-035&045-441-004 Project A proposed Planned Development Zone Change and Tentative Tract Map to allow the adjustment of two legal lots of Description: record into five new parcels.The proposed project would include recordation of a non-buildable 0.44 acre open space area and allow three new 2.69 acre parcels,one 2.93 acre parcel,and one 3.03 acre parcel for sale and/or development. The purpose of the Planned Development Zoning Overlay is to allow the creative clustering of residential parcels to perserve sensitive environmental features and provide open space easements by allowing lot configurations that do not meet the City's zoning standards.The project would preserve an existing access road that occurs over slight-to-moderate slopes and prevent grading and native tree impacts associated with installing a new 2,800 foot access road.The maximum density on the project site will not exceed the maximum density allowed by the underlying General Plan designation and the respective Zoning District.The proposed new parcels contain non-native grasslands with several native oak woodland stands and foothill pine stands.No native tree removals are required for development of the project. The site will gain access from San Diego Road. Each parcel will utilize an on-site septic system.All other utility services are available.General Plan Designation:Residential Estates(RE)Zoning District: Residential Surburban(RS)2.5-10 acre minimum lot size based on performance standards. Lead Agency Name City of Atascadero • and Address: 6500 Palma Avenue Atascadero, CA 93422 Contact Person and Glenn Rider,Associate Planner Phone Number. City of Atascadero 6500 Palma Avenue,Room 104 Atascadero,CA 93422 General Plan Residential Estates(RE) Designation: Zoning: Residential Suburban(RS) Surrounding Land North: Single-family residential Uses and Setting: South: Single-family residential West: Single-family residential East: Single-family residential Other public None agencies whose approval is required (e.g.,permits,financing approval,or participation agreement) • 11/20/02 ZCH 2002-0031;T7M-2002-0015.9105 San Diego Road.Mehring.ISMAD.GR + .t 3Y 'Yr n f mY -Az, 4 � ti s�bw wnJIL f �AR I I 11 11 11 11 I .- 7' s . �a • - r - . �..�.a.. ;25 c T _ q /1 11 1t t1 /1 I .- Y . v fi 3 �tr > s 3 -z f °;� `�, _ # .....9127 f-• s•t � nt�l ..R... }.. R' l.- is Z y • �Z,tt, ��Y`��� 5�•r � A, S�'1.��j�f�r'1}� a p � � 1 y+i � y �r .:� cS _ r�y�k'•' J�- � $ i .,�.r'�gi'h .�`.��.�.� 3 ����,;C°�'� � C. it 'a � it.moi � u„a j�4� s+_" I� � � t .�..0>'OS..�.._•'-"°•"'~ c a"' , •�;x*� �,.. s.-• . '��•, � �«+3'�+r z� 3' e+• � ! ;r- �,���,•�°.��,, .,..y♦/'z � i,,. a � t„t...•.Y a _ y� ' t 4 F �y .� y• yy yy y .- CITY OFATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY i Attachment 3 Proposed Tentative Tract Map 19 -- LCT , .. ------_--------_' •��'•' __ _---- -- __ ______ _---_ _____________-_-----_-- � 'Pi ;' •SII�F.`'.`��1,�,1�`' ,`Y1. _ —i� Ir,\ "f `\ \ IN 3 ;e�f :'d d: gip,., w.i: !/i L \\Lt r• 4� _ x =3; o s2` a ivjN. Zt _ \ •spa i as d4 '' Y:B ,©� f �'r I Int Y t I l 1 1+, `� ♦\\ i 3^ i' '�.�.�1 g xt ::i3= •F' a� \ rz it it'�° s< x t ,.��� , �'ti t; .I I i9 i. :`-moo/ •,, * ill #i;_ > �e x3 I ... tl\\ Wit i 11310l:n 1��y1• I / A ( t> \\1\$fit \\\ - S!J!: •x3 tx. „k::F -:` � f }� \1'` t\1 ;14. it i• i�;�� ii1 gi} '�';`.c 'r �' ?��_��``s'-C�\I, tl �x. m u3 ' g mull txa3xR' 3 I i ! fi x r rr r to .:1` •.ic',1;;;;;;i 1 1 Ir'!+/ttll, !/!1\t l tl It t / \ 512412.1 12d : , CD iFii3��a Al ix�` � �^br.,�• 1`y�tia'(:`;xJll tt ��� ` �! � ,ice,' ,n.2b 1120/02 ZCN 2002-0031;7TM-2002-0015.9105 San Diego Road.Mehring.ISMN D.GR CITY OFATASCADERO MTIAL STUDY i Exhibit A Timing Responsibility Mitigation s Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure ZCH 2002-0031ITTM 2002-0015 GP PS.RanningSeryes Gradng Bs:Bolding ser es Pent FD:Fire DepatTent BP:Buldmg P0:Police DeparVient 9105 & 9127 San Diego Pent CE City Engineer To: ww:Wastrmater Temporary CA.CityAWrney Occupancy AMWC:WabrCarnp. Fl:Pini impec6on FO:Final Occupancy Mitigation Measure 3.b: The project shall be conditioned to comply with all BP BS 3.b applicable District regulations pertaining to the control of fugitive dust(PM- 10)as contained in section 6.4 of the Air Quality Handbook. All site grading and demolition plans notes shall list the following regulations: A. All material excavated or graded shall be sufficiently watered to prevent excessive amounts of dust. Watering shall occur at least twice daily with complete coverage, preferably in the late morning and after work is finished for the day. B. All clearing,grading,earth moving,or excavation activities shall cease during periods of high winds(i.e.greater than 20 mph averaged over one hour)so as to prevent excessive amounts of dust. C. All material transported off-site shall be either sufficiently watered or • securely covered to prevent excessive amounts of dust. D. The area disturbed by clearing,grading,earth moving,or excavation operations shall.be minimized so as to prevent excessive amounts of dust. E. Permanent dust control measured identified in the approved project revegetation and landscape plans shall be implemented as soon as possible following completion of any soil disturbing activities. F. Exposed ground areas that are planned to be reworked at dates greater than one month after initial grading shall be sown with fast-germinating native grass seed and watered until vegetation becomes established. G. All disturbed areas not subject to revegetation shall be stabilized using approved chemical soil binders,jute netting,or other methods in advance by the APCD. H. All roadways,driveways,sidewalks,etc.to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible. In addition,structural foundations shall be completed as soon as possible following building pad construction. I. On-site vehicle speed shall be limited to 15 mph for any unpaved surface. J. All unpaved areas with vehicle traffic shall be watered at least twice per day, using non-potable water. K. Streets adjacent to the project site shall be swept daily to remove silt which may have accumulated from construction activities so as to prevent excessive amounts of dust from leaving the site. L. Wheel washers may be required when significant offsite import or export of fill is involved. M. Large canopy shade trees shall be provided along street frontages and within parking areas to shade paved areas and minimize urban heat build-up. Mitigation Measure 4.e.1: A Tree Protection Plan prepared by a Certified Arborist according to the City Of Atascadero guidelines shall be submitted during the building permit process and approved for the development of each new parcel or redevelopment of existing parcels. All tree removals X i27 1120/02 ZCH 2002-0031;TTM-2002-0015.9105 San Diego Road.Mehring.IS MN D.G R CITY OF ATASCADERO - INITIAL STUDY Exhibit A Timing ResponsibilityMitigation • Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure ZCH 2002-0031/TTM 2002-0015 GP Ps:Planningsen'es Gradng Bs.suadng services Pemiit FD:Fee Depa mnt BP.McIng M.Police Departrnent 9105 & 9127 San Diego Pwrit Ce CityFngineer To: WRWas*matar Terrpaary CA:CityAdo-y occupancy AMWC:Waw Carp. FC Final nspectlan FO:Final Occupancy shall be mitigated according to the Atascadero Tree Ordinance, by payment into the Tree Mitigation Fund,and on Mitigation Measure 5.b: Should any cultural resources be unearthed during GP PS 5.b site development work,the provisions of CEQA-Section 15064.5,will be followed to reduce impacts to a non-significant level. Mitigation Measure 6.b.1: An erosion and sedimentation control plan shall GP PS,Bs,CE s.b.2 be required for single family residential building permits on the site. All measures required by the City and the Regional Water Quality Control Board to prevent soil,dirt,and debris from entering the storm drain system during and after construction shall be implemented.The plan shall implement Regional Water Quality Control Board Best Management Practices(BMP's)and shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer and Planning Staff at the time of Building Permit application. Mitigation Measure 6.b.2: All cut and fill slopes shall be hydroseeded with GP PS,BS,CE 6.b.4 an appropriate erosion control method (Straw wattles,erosion control • blanket,hydro-mulch,or straw mulch appropriately anchored)immediately after completion of earthwork between the months of October 15 through April 15. All disturbed slopes shall have appropriate erosion control methods in place. For the duration of the project the contractor will be responsible for proper erosion control implementation and the clean-up of any mud or debris that is tracked onto public streets by construction vehicles. Mitigation Measure 6.c.d: A soils report shall be required to be submitted GP BS s.c.d with a future building permit by the building department.The building plans will be required to follow the recommendations of the soils report to assure -safety for occupants and buildings. Mitigation Measure 8.f.1/6.b.1: An erosion and sedimentation control plan GP BS 8.e shall include storm water measures for the operation and maintenance of the project for the review and approval of the City Engineer for single family residential buildingpermits on the site. All P measures required by the City and the Regional Water Quality Control Board to prevent soil,dirt, and debris from entering the storm drain system shall be implemented during and after construction. Regional Water Quality Control Board Best Management Practices(BMP's)shall be included.The Building Permit application plans shall identify Best Management Practices(BMPs) appropriate to the uses conducted on site that effectively prohibit the entry of pollutants into storm water runoff. Mitigation Measure 8.e.f.1: A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan GP PS,BS,CE 6.b.1 (SWPPP)/Erosion Control Plan shall be submitted and approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of the building permit. The plan shall include storm water measures for the operation and maintenance of the project for the review and approval of the City Engineer. The Building Permit application plans shall identify Best Management Practices(BMPs) • appropriate to the uses conducted on site that effectively prohibit the entry 1120/02 ZCH 2002-0031 San San Diego 1 ,2 Road.Mehring.ISMND.GR CITY OFATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY • Exhibit A Timing Responsibility Mitigation Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure ZCH 2002-0031/TTM 2002-0015 GP: PS.PlanringServces Gradng BS:Broking Swkes PWrit FD:Fre DWa tnwt BP.Suadng PD:Ponce Deparrent 9105 & 9127 San Diego Pearit CEGtyEnyineer To: WWI.wastwarer Tertp«ary GtCAyAaomey Cocupancy AMWC:WZWCWV. FI:Final inspecWn F6 Find 00CWarry of pollutants into storm water runoff. Mitigation Measure 8.e.f.2: The developer is responsible for ensuring that GP PS,Bs,CE 6.b.3 all contractors are aware of all storm water quality measures and that such measures are implemented. Failure to comply with the approved construction Best Management Practices will result in the issuance of correction notices,citations,or stop orders. Mitigation Measure 11.d: All construction activities shall comply with the BP, BS 11.d City of Atascadero Noise Ordinance for hours of operation. GP Construction activities shall be limited to the following hours of operation: • 7 a.m.to 7 p.m. Monday through Friday • 9 a.m.to 6 p.m.Saturday • No construction on Sunday Further,particularly loud noises shall not occur before 8 a.m.on weekdays • and not at all on weekends. The hours of construction may be modified by the Community Development Director upon a determination that unusually loud construction activities are having a significant impact on the neighbors. Failure to comply with the above-described hours of operation may result in withholding of inspections and possible construction prohibitions,subject to the review and approval of the Planning Commission. A sign shall be posted on-site with the hours of operation and a telephone number of the person to be contacted in the event of any violations. The details of such a sign shall be approved by staff during the Grading Plan/Building Permit review process. _ 29 1120102 ZCH 2002-0031;TTM-2002-0015.9105 San Diego Road.Mehring.ISMND.G R CITY OF ATASCADERO - INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: • The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project,involving at least one impact that is a"Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ❑ Aesthetics ❑ Agriculture Resources ❑ Air Quality ❑ Biological Resources ❑ Cultural Resources ❑ Geology/Soils ❑ Hazards&Hazardous ❑ Hydrology/Water Quality ❑ Land Use/Planning Materials ❑ Mineral Resources ❑ Noise ❑ Population/Housing ❑ Public Services ❑ Recreation ❑ Transportation/Traffic ❑ Utilities/Service Systems ❑ Mandatory Findings of Significance On the basis of this initial evaluation: ❑ I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ® I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,there will • not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a"potentially significant effect"or"potentially significant unless mitigated"impact on the environment,but at least one effect 1)has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards,and 2)has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required,but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. ❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects(a)have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards and(b)have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revi 'ons or mi ' tion measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. Glenn Rider Associate Planner 1120/02 ZCH 2002-0031;17M-2002-0015.9105 San Diego V Road.MehdngJSMND.GR CITY OF ATASCADERO • rMTIAL STUDY EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except"No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a Lead Agency cites following each question. A"No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved(e.g.the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A"No Impact"answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards(e.g.the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants,based on a project-specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved,including off-site as well as on-site,cumulative as well as project-level,indirect as well as direct,and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) "Potentially Significant Impact" is'appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. If there are one or more"Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made,an EIR is required. 4) "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from"Potentially Significant Impact"to a"Less than Significant Impact." The Lead Agency must describe the mitigation measures,and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level(mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses,"may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier analyses may be used where,pursuant to the tiering,program EIR,or other CEQA process,an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). Earlier analyses • are discussed in Section XVII at the end of the checklist. 6) Lead Agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references information sources for potential impacts(e.g.general plans,zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should,where appropriate,include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. A source list should be attached. Other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 13� 11/20/02 ZCH 2002-0031;mTM•2002-0015.9105 San Diego Road.Mehring.ISMN D.GR -Ai CITY OFATASCADERO - INITIAL STUDY Initial Study 2002-0046 Potentially Less Than Less Than N • 0 Significant Significant with Significant Impact ZCH 2002-00311TTM 2002-0015 Impact Mitigation Impact 9105 &9127 San Diego Incorporation 1.AESTHETICS--Would the project: a)Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b)Substantially damage scenic resources,including,but not limited to,trees,rock outcroppings,and historic buildings EJ El within a state scenic highway? c)Substantially degrade the existing visual character or 1`71 F1quality of the site and its surroundings? El d)Create a new source of substantial light or glare that ® El adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? El SOURCES: Project Description-Photos; 10/24/02 Mehring Tentative Tract Map 2460,Twin Cities Surveying Inc.; 11/20/02 Planning Staff Site Visit;9/27/02 Percolation Tests-Buena Geotechnical Services, LLC.; DISCUSSION:The project site is not located within a scenic vista or naturally scenic corridor. The moderately sloped parcels are within the City's RS(Residential Suburban)zoning district bounded on all sides by developed and vacant residential land uses and a public roadway,San Diego Road. Residential lighting at the site shall be designed to eliminate off site glare. Residential lighting impacts for the density allowed by the zone district have been determined to be a less than significant impact based on the minimum lot size and light shed distances of typical residential lighting schemes analyzed under the City Of Atascadero General Plan. Site topography and vegetation prevent light • spillage and prevent visibility of all new parcels from the existing residences and public roadway.The project designates future access roads and building sites which will not remove native trees on the site,and thus will not reduce the natural aesthetics of the site. 2.AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES: In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997)prepared by the California Dept.of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland.Would the project: a)Convert Prime Farmland,Unique Farmland,or Farmland El 0 El of Statewide Importance(Farmland),as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency,to non- agricultural use? b)Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use,or a Williamson Act contract? El El El X c)Involve other changes in the existing environment which, El EJ due to their location or nature,could result in conversion of Farmland,to non-agricultural use? SOURCES: Land Use Element EIR. DISCUSSION a.) The property is not shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency as prime farmland. 11/20/02 Page 11 ZCH 2002.0031.TrM-2002-0015.9105 San Dego Road.Mehring.ISMND.G R Qo T CITY OF ATA SCADERO MTL4L STUDY • Initial Study 2002-0046 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant with Significant 9 g nt Impac4 ZCH 2002-00311TTM 2002-0015 Impact Mitigation Impact 9105 & 9127 San Diego Incorporation b.) The property is not under a Williamson Act contract. c.) The project will not result in the conversion of farmland to non-agricultural uses. 3.AIR QUALITY--The significance criteria established by the Air Quality Control District in its CEQA Guidelines may be relied upon to make the following determinations.Would the project: a)Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable NA air quality plan? b)Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c)Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non El 11 - attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard(including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d)Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? • e)Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? SOURCES: Project description, Land Use Element EIR,CEQA Air Quality Handbook-Air Pollution Control District (APCD), 10/24/02 Mehring Tentative Tract Map 2460,Twin Cities Surveying Inc.; 11/20/02 Planning Staff Site Visit; DISCUSSION: 3.a.c.)Since the City has not reached it's buildout figure,the residential density proposed constitutes development that is less than anticipated in the City's General Plan and EIR. Additional vehicle trips generated by the proposed residential project will not exceed the trips anticipated in the General Plan or EIR for the project site. This impact is considered less than significant. This project will not affect or produce any significant air pollutants after completion of construction. Construction activities,including site grading may produce small quantities of air pollution, including dust and equipment exhaust. Any air quality impacts will be temporary and short term. 3.b.)Construction activities,including site grading may produce small quantities of air pollution, including dust and equipment exhaust. Any air quality impacts will be temporary and short term. 3.d.)The construction of residential single family dwellings and the associated public improvements will not concentrate pollutants. 3.e.)The construction of residential single family dwellings and the associated public improvements will not create permanent objectionable odors. With incorporation of the below—stated mitigation measure,the project will not have a significant effect on the environment. Mitigation Measure 3.b: At the time of grading and building permits for new residences,the project shall be conditioned to comply with all applicable District regulations pertaining to the control of fugitive dust(PM-10)as contained in section 6.4 of the Air Quality Handbook. All site grading and demolition plans notes shall list the following regulations: • A. All material excavated or graded shall be sufficiently watered to prevent excessive amounts of dust. Watering r - 13 J 11/20/02 Page 12 ZCH 2002-0031;TTM-2002-0015.9105 San Diego Road.Mehdng.ISM ND.GR t —z CITY OF ATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY Initial Study 2002-0046 Potentially Less Than Less Than No • Significant Sig nifica nt with Significant Impact ZCH 2002-00311TTM 2002-0015 Impact Mitigation Impact 9105 &9127 San Diego Incorporation shall occur at least twice daily with complete coverage, preferably in the late morning and after work is finished for the day. B. All clearing,grading,earth moving,or excavation activities shall cease during periods of high winds(i.e.greater than 20 mph averaged over one hour)so as to prevent excessive amounts of dust. C. All material transported off-site shall be either sufficiently watered or securely covered to prevent excessive amounts of dust. D. The area disturbed by clearing,grading,earth moving,or excavation operations shall be minimized so as to prevent excessive amounts of dust. E. Permanent dust control measured identified in the approved project revegetation and landscape plans shall be implemented as soon as possible following completion of any soil disturbing activities. F. Exposed ground areas that are planned to be reworked at dates greater than one month after initial grading shall be sown with fast-germinating native grass seed and watered until vegetation becomes established. G. All disturbed areas not subject to revegetation shall be stabilized using approved chemical soil binders,jute netting,or other methods in advance by the APCD. H. All roadways,driveways,sidewalks,etc.to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible. In addition, structural foundations shall be completed as soon as possible following building pad construction. 1. On-site vehicle speed shall be limited to 15 mph for any unpaved surface. J. All unpaved areas with vehicle traffic shall be watered at least twice per day, using non-potable water. K. Streets adjacent to the project site shall be swept daily to remove silt,which may have accumulated from construction activities so as to prevent excessive amounts of dust from leaving the site. L. Wheel washers may be required when significant offsite import or export of fill is involved. 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES--Would the project: • a)Have a substantial adverse effect,either directly or through habitat modifications,on any species identified as a El El candidate,sensitive,or special status species in local or regional plans, policies,or regulations,or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b)Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat 1171 or other sensitive natural community identified in local or El R regional plans, policies,or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c)Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including,but not limited to,marsh,vernal pool,coastal, etc.)through direct removal,filling,hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with EJ El El V\J established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors,or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e)Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources,such as a tree preservation policy or El El El ordinance? f)Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat 1171 • Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, kL J 134 11120/02 Page 13 ZCH 2002.0031;TTM-2002-0015.9105 San Diego J Road.Mehring.IS MN D.GR CITY OFATASCADERO rMTIAL S Y • _ Potential) Initial Study 2002 0046 Y Less Than Less Than No Significant 9 Significant with Significant Impact ZCH 2002-0031/TTM 2002-0015 Impact Mitigation Impact 9105 &9127 San Diego Incorporation or other approved local,regional,or state habitat conservation plan? SOURCES: Project Description-Photos; 10/24/02 Mehring Tentative Tract Map 2460,Twin Cities Surveying Inc.; 11/20/02 Planning Staff Site Visit; DISCUSSION: 4.a.) No sensitive species have been found near the site. 4.b.) The project will not involve construction in a riparian habitat. 4.c.) There are no wetlands on the project site. 4.d.) The Land Use Element EIR concludes that development within the city limits will not have a significant impact on wildlife or wildlife corridors. 4e.f.)The proposed project will not conflict with local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources nor will it conflict with any conservation plans. However,the existence of native trees shall require the following mitigation measure to reduce any potential impacts to a level of insignificance: Mitigation Measure 4.e.1: A Tree Protection Plan prepared by a Certified Arborist according to the City Of Atascadero guidelines shall be submitted during the building permit process and approved for the development of each new parcel or redevelopment of existing parcels. All tree removals shall be mitigated according to the Atascadero Tree Ordinance, by payment into the Tree Mitigation Fund,and on-site native tree planting. 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES--Would the project: • a)Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of E E E] a historical resource as defined in'15064.5? b)Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to'15064.5? c)Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? El 0 VN SOURCES: Project Description-Photos; 10/24/02 Mehring Tentative Tract Map 2460,Twin Cities Surveying Inc.; 11/20/02 Planning Staff Site Visit; DISCUSSION:5.a.b.c.d)No known historical,archeological or cultural sites have been found or documented in the vicinity of the project. However,a mitigation measure has been included in the event archaeological resources are unearthed during construction. Mitigation Measure 5.b.1: Should any cultural resources be unearthed during site development work,the provisions of CEQA-Section 15064.5,will be followed to reduce impacts to a non-significant level. 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS--Would the project: a)Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects,including the risk of loss,injury,or death El El involving: I)Rupture of a known earthquake fault,as delineated • on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known _ 11/20102 Page 14 Zcrt 2002-0031;TTM-2002-0015.9105 San Diego Road.Mehdng.ISMN D.G R CITY OFATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY Initial Study 2002-0046 Potentially Less Than Less Than No • Significant Significantwith Significant Impact ZCH 2002-00311TTM 2002-0015 Impact Mitigation Impact 9105 &9127 San Diego Incorporation fault?Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii)Strong seismic ground shaking? ❑ ❑ iii)Seismic-related ground failure,including ❑ liquefaction? iv)Landslides? ❑ ❑ b)Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? El ® ❑ c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable,or ® ❑ ❑ that would become unstable as a result of the project,and potentially result in on-or off-site landslide,lateral spreading,subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d)Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code(1994),creating substantial risks to life or property? e)Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of • wastewater? SOURCES: Project Description-Photos; 10/24/02 Mehring Tentative Tract Map 2460,Twin Cities Surveying Inc.; 11/20/02 Planning Staff Site Visit;9/27/02 Percolation Tests-Buena Geotechnical Services, LLC. DISCUSSION: 6.a.) The project is not located on any known earthquake faults. 6.b.) Construction activities on each site proposed for development will be required to comply with sedimentation and erosion control measures prescribed by the city engineer and required by the Regional Water Quality Control Board. 6.c.)The property contains no unusual geological formations. 6.c,d,e.) A Geotechnical Engineering Report is required in the City Of Atascadero for a building permit for a single family residence.The report indicates if there is any significant soils or geotechnical conditions that would impact construction of the proposed project. The project will be served by on site engineered septic systems. Mitigation Measure 6.b.1: An erosion and sedimentation control plan shall be required for single family residential building permits on the site. All measures required by the City and the Regional Water Quality Control Board to prevent soil,dirt,and debris from entering the storm drain system during and after construction shall be implemented. The plan shall implement Regional Water Quality Control Board Best Management Practices(BMP's)and shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer and Planning Staff at the time of Building Permit application. Mitigation Measure 6.b.2: All cut and fill slopes shall be hydroseeded with an appropriate erosion control method (Straw wattles,erosion control blanket,hydro-mulch,or straw mulch appropriately anchored)immediately after completion of earthwork between the months of October 15 through April 15. All disturbed slopes shall have appropriate erosion control methods in place. For the duration of the project the contractor will be responsible for proper erosion control implementation and the clean-up of any mud or debris that is tracked onto public streets by construction vehicles. Mitigation Measure 6.c.d: A soils report shall be required to be submitted with a future building permit by the building department.The buildinglans will be required to follow P q ow the recommendations f ons of the soils report to occupants and buildings. P assure safety for • 11/20/02 Page 15 ZCH 2002-0031;TTM-2002-0015.9105 San Diego Road.Mehring.ISMND.G R 4. � CITY OFATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY • Initial Study 2002-0046 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant with Significant Impact ZCH 2002-003lrTTM 2002-0015 Impact Mitigation Impact 9105 &9127 San Diego Incorporation 7. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS--Would the project: a)Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use,or disposal El El El of hazardous materials? b)Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and El El El VN accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c)Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials,substances,or waste within one- quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d)Be located on a site which is included on a list of El hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and,as a result,would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e)For a project located within an airport land use plan area El . or,where such a plan has not been adopted,within two miles of a public airport or public use airport,would the project result in a safety hazard for people living or working in the project area? f)For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip,would the project result in a safety hazard for people living or El El V\J working in the project area? g)Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h)Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires,including where El wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? SOURCES: Project Description-Photos; 10/24/02 Mehring Tentative Tract Map 2460,Twin Cities Surveying Inc.; 11/20/02 Planning Staff Site Visit;9/27/02 Percolation Tests-Buena Geotechnical Services, LLC.; DISCUSSION 7a.b.c. Homes and offices do not generate or involve use of significant amounts of hazardous materials.There are no known hazardous materials on the site or nearby. 7.d. The property is not a listed hazardous material site. 7e.f. The property is not near an airport. 7g.h.The site is within the Fire Department's seven-minute response area and a fire department turn around will be provided within 150 feet of the residence.The Fire Marshall will determine if the buildings will have fire sprinklers during review of the building permit. Fire hydrants are required every 700 feet along the length of the access driveway. • 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY--Would the 11rz0102 Page 16 ZCH 2002-0031;TTM-2002.0015.9105 San Diego Road.Mehdng.ISMN D.G R CITY OF ATAS CADERO INITIAL STUDY Initial Study 2002-0046 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant with Significant Impact ZCH 2002-00311TTM 2002-0015 impact Mitigation impact 9105 &9127 San Diego Incorporation project: a)Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? El El b)Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there El El would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level(e.g.,the production rate of previously-existing nearby wells would drop to a level that would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c)Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area,including through the alteration of the course of a EJ El stream or river,in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on-or off-site? d)Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site ® El area,including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river,or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner that would result in flooding on-or off-site? e)Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the El capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? 0 Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? ® EJ ❑ g)Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood El El Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures that would impede or redirect flood flows? EJ El 11 i)Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding,including flooding as a El El result of the failure of a levee or dam? j)Inundation by seiche,tsunami,or mudflow? a ❑ SOURCES: Project Description-Photos; 10/24/02 Mehring Tentative Tract Map 2460,Twin Cities Surveying Inc.; 11/20/02 Planning Staff Site Visit;9/27/02 Percolation Tests-Buena Geotechnical Services, LLC.;. DISCUSSION: 8a. Construction will be required to comply with the Regional Water Quality Control Board regulations of the discharge of construction materials,pollutant laden waters(washings),or soil from the site into drainages.An erosion and sedimentation control plan is required for the construction of single family residences. 8b. The project will not deplete ground water supplies. Water will be provided by Atascadero Mutual Water Company. 8c.d.e.f. The project will not alter any drainage course. Construction activities are subject to review for compliance with City drainage and grading regulations. Drainage will not be permitted to create or intensify any hazards for persons or property in the vicinity. • 8.g.h.i. Future residential parcels will be outside of the 100-year flood hazard area. 11120/02 Page 17 zcH 2002-0031;TTM-2002-0015.9105 San Diego Road.Mehdng.ISMN D.GR CITY OFATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY • Initial Study 2002-0046 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant with Significant Impact ZCH 2002-0031/TTM 2002-0015 Impact Mitigation Impact 9105 & 9127 Sart Diego Incorporation 8.1.j. The project area isnot subject to innundation by a tsunami. Mitigation Measure 6.b.1/81.1: An erosion and sedimentation control plan shall include storm water measures for the operation and maintenance of the project for the review and approval of the City Engineer for single family residential building permits on the site. All measures required by the City and the Regional Water Quality Control Board to prevent soil,dirt,and debris from entering the storm drain system shall be implemented during and after construction. Regional Water Quality Control Board Best Management Practices(BMP's)shall be included.The Building Permit application plans shall identify Best Management Practices(BMPs)appropriate to the uses conducted on site that effectively prohibit the entry of pollutants into storm water runoff. Mitigation Measure 8.e.f.2: The developer is responsible for ensuring that all contractors are aware of all storm water quality measures and that such measures are implemented. Failure to comply with the approved construction Best Management Practices will result in the issuance of correction notices,citations,or stop orders. 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING-Would the project: a)Physically divide an established community? ❑ ❑ ❑ b)Conflict with any applicable land use plan,policy,or ❑ ❑ ® ❑ regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including,but not limited to the general plan,specific plan, • local coastal program,or zoning ordinance)adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c)Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? ❑ ❑ ❑ SOURCES: Project Description-Photos; 10/24/02 Mehring Tentative Tract Map 2460,Twin Cities Surveying Inc.; 11/20/02 Planning Staff Site Visit;9/27/02 Percolation Tests-Buena Geotechnical Services, LLC.;. DISCUSSION: 9.a. The project will not physically divide an established community. A residential use in the proposed location is consistent and compatible with the surrounding office commercial complex. As proposed,the single family residential use is consistent with the General Plan and surrounding existing and future land uses. 9.b.The General Plan identifies this site as single family residential. The project proposes 3 new single family units and 2 existing units on 14.03 acres(0.35 units/acre),which is consistent with the General Plan Residential Estates land use designation. In addition,the project proposes to offer a portion of non-buildable open space and preserve and existing non-complying paved access road that occurs across moderate slopes and through sensitive oak woodlands.Significant environmental impacts are avoided by utilizing the existing paved road.The use can be justified in the proposed location as the total overall density cannot be lowered. 9.c.The project is consistent with the open space and conservation policies identified in the General Plan. 10.MINERAL RESOURCES--Would the project: a)Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral El ❑ resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b)Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important ❑ ❑ ❑ • mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan,specific plan or other land use plan? 1MOM Page 18 ZCH 2002-0031;TTM-2002-0015.9105 San Diego Road.Mehdng.lSMN D.GR CITY OFATASCADERO rMTIAL STUDY Initial Study 2002-0046 Potentially Less Than Less Than No • Significant Significant with Significant Impact ZCH 2002-0031/TTM 2002-0015 Impact Mitigation Impact 9105 &9127 San Diego Incorporation SOURCES: Project Description-Photos; 10/24/02 Mehring Tentative Tract Map 2460,Twin Cities Surveying Inc.; 11/20/02 Planning Staff Site Visit;9/27/02 Percolation Tests-Buena Geotechnical Services, LLC.;. DISCUSSION: 10.a.b. No mining is proposed as a part of this project. No known mineral resources have been identified in the area. 11. NOISE--Would the project result in: a)Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the.local general plan or El El 1-1 noise ordinance,or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ground-borne vibration or ground-bome noise levels? El El ie�J c)A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels ® ❑ in the project vicinity above levels existing without the El project? d)A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e)For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted,within two miles of a public airport or public use airport,would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? D For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip,would the project expose people living or working in the project El 0 area to excessive noise levels? SOURCES: Project Description-Photos; 10/24/02 Mehring Tentative Tract Map 2460,Twin Cities Surveying Inc.; 11/20/02 Planning Staff Site Visit;9/27/02 Percolation Tests-Buena Geotechnical Services, LLC.;.. DISCUSSION: 11a.b.c.d. Construction is expected to involve some heavy machinery and use of impact tools that make noise. Noise levels on the site are thus expected to be raised temporarily.. The future residential P Y uses are not anticipated to generate unacceptable levels of 9 P noise to future adjacent residential uses. 11.e.f. The project is not located within an airport land use plan or private airstrip. Mitigation Measure 11.d: All construction activities shall comply with the City of Atascadero Noise Ordinance for hours of operation. Construction activities shall be limited to the following hours of operation: • 7 a.m.to 7 p.m. Monday through Friday • 9 a.m.to 6 p.m.Saturday • No construction on Sunday Further,particularly loud noises shall not occur before 8 a.m.on weekdays and not at all on weekends. The hours of construction may be modified by the Community Development Director upon a determination that unusually loud construction activities are having a significant impact on the neighbors. Failure to comply with the above-described hours of operation may result in withholding of inspections and possible • 1MO102 Page 19 ZCH 2002-0031;TTM-2002-0015.9105 San Diego Road.Mehring.ISMN D.GR *051-0.-L CITY OF ATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY • Initial Study 2002-0046 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significantwith Significant Impact ZCH 2002-0031/TTM 2002-0015 Impact Mitigation Impact 9105 &9127 Sart Diego Incorporation construction prohibitions,subject to the review and approval of the Planning Commission. A sign shall be posted on-site with the hours of operation and a telephone number of the person to be contacted in the event of any violations. The details of such a sign shall be approved b 9 pp y staff during the Grading Plan/Budding Permit review process. 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING--Would the project: a)Induce substantial population growth in an area,either El directly(for example,by proposing new homes and businesses)or indirectly(for example,through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c)Displace substantial numbers of people,necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? SOURCES: Project Description-Photos; 10/24/02 Mehring Tentative Tract Map 2460,Twin Cities Surveying Inc.; 11/20/02 Planning Staff Site Visit;9/27/02 Percolation Tests-Buena Geotechnical Services, LLC.;.. • DISCUSSION: 12.a. The General Plan identifies this site as single family residential with 2.5-10 acre minimum lot sizes based on environmental performance criteria. The project proposes five single family residential units of which,two are existing on 14.03 acres (0.36 units/acre),which is consistent with the General plan land use designation The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan land use and housing elements. 12.b.c. No housing or persons will be displaced. Xlll. PUBLIC SERVICES a)Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities,need for new or physically altered governmental facilities,the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts,in order to maintain acceptable service ratios,response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? ❑ Police protection? El El El N Schools? El ❑ Parks? El E ❑ Other public facilities? El El ❑ • SOURCES: Project Description-Photos; 10/24/02 Mehring Tentative Tract Map 2460,Twin Cities Surveying Inc.; 11/20/02 Planning Staff Site Visit;9/27/02 Percolation Tests-Buena Geotechnical Services, LLC.;.. 11120102 Page 20 ZCH 2002-0031.TTM-2002-0015.9105 San Diego Road.Mehdng.ISMN D.GR �0 CITY OF ATASCADERO INITIAL STTiDY Initial Study 2002-0046 Potentially Less Than Less Than No . Significant Significant with Significant Impact ZCH 2002-00311TTM 2002-0015 Impact Mitigation Impact 9105 &9127 San Diego Incorporation DISCUSSION: Development Impact Fees: Development Impact Fees will be required of any new project for which a building permit is issued. The concept of the impact fee program is to fund and sustain improvements which are needed as a result of new development as stated in the General Plan and other policy documents within the fee program. Development Impact Fees fall into the following categories: Drainage Fees(including the Amapoa Tecorida Drainage Area Fee); Streets, Road, Bridge Fees;Sewer Fees;Public Safety Fees;and Park Fees,Miscellaneous Fees. In addition, school fees are collected by the Atascadero Unified School District. The amount of impact fees to be paid will be determined at the time of issuance of building permit. Fire and Police: Impact fees are charged for new development,to help pay the cost of providing new facilities to serve the expanding city.The Fire Department of the City of Atascadero has indicated that it will be able to adequately service the proposed project. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Fire Department. The City of Atascadero Police Department has also indicated that the proposed project poses no problems to the police to adequately service it. Schools: At buildout,the city's population will overburden the existing school system unless additional classroom space is added.The Atascadero Unified School District charges impact fees to fund additional schools as needed. State law restricts mitigation of school impacts to the levying of these fees and other measures adopted by the school district. Provision of adequate facilities for the population is the responsibility of the school district. Fees will be required through construction permits for the residence. Parks: New residences will increase demand on parks and recreation facilities.The city's Parks&Recreation Commission is committed to finding ways to continue to provide parks and other recreational opportunities to city residents as the city expands,thereby addressing cumulative impacts. Other public facilities:The construction of the project is not expected to have significant impacts on any other public facilities. 14. RECREATION-- a)Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational F1 N facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b)Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities that might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? SOURCES: Project Description-Photos; 10/24/02 Mehring Tentative Tract Map 2460,Twin Cities Surveying Inc.; 11/20/02 Planning Staff Site Visit;9/27/02 Percolation Tests-Buena Geotechnical Services, LLC.;.. DISCUSSION: 15.a. Residents are expected to use existing parks and recreational facilities,but the numbers are not expected to result in substantial physical deterioration of any facilities. 15.b. The project does not involve construction of significant recreational facilities. 15.TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC—Would the project: a)Cause an increase in traffic that is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system EJ 0 (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of 11/20/02 Page 21 ZCH 2002-0031;TTM-2002-0015.9105 San Diego Road.Mehdng.ISMN D.GR 0. CITY OFATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY • Initial Study 2002-0046 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significantwith Significant Impact ZCH 2002-00311TTM 2002-0015 Impact Mitigation Impact 9105 &9127 San Diego Incorporation vehicle trips,the volume to capacity ratio on roads,or congestion at intersections)? b)Exceed,either individually or cumulatively,a level of service standard established by the county congestion El El management agency for designated roads or highways? c)Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d)Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g.,sharp curves or dangerous intersections)or El incompatible uses(e.g.,farm equipment)? e)Result in inadequate emergency access? 0 Result in inadequate parking capacity? g)Conflict with adopted policies, plans,or programs supporting alternative transportation(e.g.,bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? SOURCES: Project Description-Photos; 10/24/02 Mehring Tentative Tract Map 2460,Twin Cities Surveying Inc.; 11/20/02 Planning Staff Site Visit;9/27/02 Percolation Tests-Buena Geotechnical Services, LLC.;.. DISCUSSION: 15a.b.The Circulation Element(CE)anticipates an increase in development in this area. The project will take primary access from San Diego Road. This impact is considered less than significant. 15.c. No changes will occur to the air traffic patterns. 15.d. Each new residential parcel's driveway has adequate site distance onto the main accessway and the project's access has adequate site distance onto San Diego Road. 15.e. The project will have adequate emergency access from San Diego Road. 151 Adequate pdrking will be provided on-site for the future commercial and residential use. 15.g The project does not conflict with adopted policies, plans,or programs supporting alternative transportation. 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS--Would the project: a)Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? El 11 b)Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities,the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c)Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities,the El El construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? • d)Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources,or are new 11/20102 Page 22 ZCH 2002-0031.TTM-2002-0015.9105 San Diego Road.Mehring.ISMND.GR CM OFATASCADERO IMTIAL STUDY Initial Study 2002-0046 Potentially Less Than Less Than No • Significant Significant with Significant Impact ZCH 2002-0031/TTM 2002-0015 Impact Mitigation Impact 9105 &9127 San Diego Incorporation or expanded entitlements needed? e)Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider that serves or may serve the project that it has VIA adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f)Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? El El g)Comply with federal,state,and local"statutes and regulations related to solid waste? SOURCES: Project Description-Photos; 10/24/02 Mehring Tentative Tract Map 2460,Twin Cities Surveying Inc.; 11/20/02 Planning Staff Site Visit;9/27/02 Percolation Tests-Buena Geotechnical Services, LLC.;.. Architects. DISCUSSION: Water: The Atascadero Mutual Water Company(AMWC)will provide water. All property within the city limits is entitled to water from the AMWC. The project is not expected to require significant quantities of water for the proposed uses. Water is pumped from two portions of the largest underground basin in the county,the Paso Robles Formation, using a series of shallow and deep wells.The water company anticipates that it will be able to meet the city's needs through buildout and beyond: 0 Water demand at buildout under the LUE is estimated at about 8,500 acre-feet per year(AFY).The total available groundwater supply greatly exceeds demand,according to the findings of the Long-Term Viability of Water study. However,the water company does not currently have the deep wells needed to tap into the total amount needed at buildout. The water company is currently developing plans for installing wells where they will be most effective and will not conflict with water rights of others. According to the Water Company,development of additional wells is expected to keep pace with construction in the city,so that water supply will not be interrupted. Sewer. The project is not required to utilize the City's Sewer system.On-site septic systems are required for each new residential parcel. Storm Water. Storm water discharge will be handled by an on City stormwater connection. 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE-- a)Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment,substantially reduce the habitat of a fish El VN or wildlife species,cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels,threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community,reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b)Does the project have impacts that are individually limited,but cumulatively considerable?("Cumulatively considerable"means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects,the effects of other current projects, • q 11/20102 Page 23 ZCH 2002-0031;TTM-2002-0015.9105 San Diego 9 Road.Mehring.ISMN D.GR CITY OF ATASCADERO rMT 4-L STUDY Initial Study 2002-0046 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant with Significant Impact ZCH 2002-0031/TTM 2002-0015 Impact Mitigation Impact 9105 &9127 San Diego Incorporation and the effects of probable future projects)? c)Does the project have environmental effects that will 0 cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,either El directly or indirectly? DISCUSSION: The project site is an semi-developed residential infill site,which is proposed for lot sizes consistent with the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance.The proposed Tentative Tract Map will require a Zone Change Planned Development overlay that will allow lot configuration outside the orderly development subdivision standards outlined in the Atascadero Subdivision Ordinance,and the Subdivision Map Act,in order to prevent further environmental impacts associated with grading a new 2,800 linear foot access road. The proposed project has been analyzed as required by CEQA. Project-related impacts have been identified and mitigation measures have been Included within the proposal to reduce the effect of the proposed project as described herein. SOURCES: General Plan Land Use Element, City of Atascadero,2002 Zoning Ordinance,part of Municipal Code, City of Atascadero,as amended through 1999. Project description includes: Site,Grading&Drainage Plan, Roberts Engineering 9/25/01 Land Use Element Environmental Impact Report,Crawford, Multari,&Clark,adopted 2002 CEQA Handbook,Air Quality Control District,August 1995 • General Plan Safety Element, City of Atascadero,2002 General Plan Circulation Element,2002 General Plan Noise Element,adopted 2002 Acoustical Design Manual,Brown-Buntin Associates, 1991 Noise Ordinance,City of Atascadero, 1992 Guide for Developers,Atascadero Fire Department, 1998 draft Flood Insurance Rate Map,community-panel number 060700 0006 B, Federal Emergency Management Agency, January 20, 1982 ITE Trip Generation Manual,6th Edition, Institute of Traffic Engineers PROJECT-SPECIFIC SOURCES: 10/24/02 Mehring Tentative Tract Map 2460,Twin Cities Surveying Inc. Geotechnical Engineering Report,Sept.,2001, Buena Geotechnical Services • ,P � p+ y 11120102 Page 24 ZCH 2002-0031;TTM-2002-0015.9105 San Diego Road.Mehdng.ISMN D.G R ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 02/11/2003 Exhibit 8: Mitigated Negative Declaration Comments • ZCH 2002-0031/CUP 2002-0089/TTM 2002-0015 AIS POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT 1 i I December 9,2002 DEC 1 0 Inr> ' Glen Rider,Associate Planner City of Atascadero,Community Development Department 6500 Palma Avenue Atascadero CA 93422 SUBJECT: Mchring Zone Change and Tentative Tract Map(2002-0031,2002-0015) Dear Mr.Rider, Thank youforincluding the Air Pollution Control District(District)in the environmental review process. We have completed our review of the proposed zone change and tentative tract map for the property located at 9105 di 9127 San Diego Road in Atascadero. We have the following comments on the proposal. > The proposed lot adjustments will yield 5 lots that are slightly larger than the minimum of 2.5 acres for Residential Suburban development and is consistent with the current City of Atascadero General Plan. While this adjustment would increase the housing density on this land,the District prefers to see in-fill take place near the urban core where the housing density tends to be much greater. The proposed minimum density development of the proposed urban fringe project fosters • continued dependency of private auto use as the only viable means of access to,essential services and other destinations. This is inconsistent with the land use planning strategies recommended in the Cleats Air Plan,which promote the concept of compact development by directing growth to areas within existing urban and village reserve lines. Page 13 of the Initial Study was not included with the project referral. We assume however,that the mitigation measures proposed on that page were identical to those listed in Exhibit A, II hfitigationMeasure3.b,which included fugitive dust mitigation measures and the addition of shade trees to reduce surface temperatures. These mitigation measures would be necessary to minimize nuisance concerns and to reduce fugitive dust emissions during the construction phase. Asbestos has been identified by the state Air Resources Board as a toxic air contaminant Serpentine and ultramafic rocks are very common in the state and may contain naturally Resources Board Air Toxics Control Measure ATCM occurring asbestos.''Under the State Air ( )_ g for Construction,Grading,Quarrying,and Surface Mining Operations,prior to any grading activities at the site,a geologic evaluation will be necessary to determine if naturally occurring,asbestos ris present. If naturally occurring,asbestos is found at the site the applicant must comply with all requirements outlined in the Asbestos A'TCNI for Construction,Grading,Quarrying,and Surface Mining Operations. These requirements may include but are not limited to 1)an Asbestos Dust Mitigation Plan which must be 3433 Roberto Court'•Saes l.u1s Obispo,CA 93401 805-781-5912-FAX:805-7814002 tato117 slcrle;uiiir,oru -a »�rwslc7deaualrost • ITEM NUMBER: B-I DATE: 02/11/2003 • Exhibit B: Mitigated Negative Declaration Comments ZCH 2002-0031/CUP 2002-0089/TTM 2002-0015 Mehring Zone Change Page 2 December 9,2002 approved by the District before construction begins,and 2)an Asbestos Health and Safety Program will also be required for some projects. Please refer to the District web page at http://www.slocle,"ir.org/business/-bestos.asp for more information regarding these requirements. if you have any questions regarding these requirements,please contact Karen Brooks of our Enforcement Division at 781-5912. Again,thank you for the opportunity to comment on this project. if you have any questions or comments,please feel free to contact me at 781-5912. Sincerely, Andy ger Air Quality Specialist cc: Karen Brooks,Enforcement Division HAT/AJM/sll • H:`.�s�pfanYeapanset2A01.doc _ - 1 • 1.47 ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 02/11/2003 Exhibit 13: Mitigated Negative Declaration Comments • ZCH 2002-0031/CUP 2002-0089=M 2002-0015 City Of Atascadero Response to APCD Comments Subject: 9105 & 9127 San Diego Road: Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration 2002-0046 Recent standardized regulation for fugitive naturally occurring asbestos is a new CEQA threshold for the entire area. The City Of Atascadero will evaluate when to incorporate mitigation upon reviewing geological maps of project areas. If a project falls within an area known to contain asbestos, mitigation measures will be incorporated into the project. Mitigation will be crafted after the new State Air Resources Board Air Toxics Control Measure's (ATCM) guide for construction, grading, quarrying, and surface mining operations. • • ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 02/11/2003 • Attachment 4: Draft Ordinance A ZCH 2002-0031/CUP 2002-0089/rrM 2002-0015 DRAFT RESOLUTION ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO APPROVING ZONE CHANGE 2002-0031 TO AMEND THE CITY'S ZONING MAP TO ADD A PD 16 OVERLAY DISTRICT TO 9105 AND 9127 SAN DIEGO ROAD. (9105 & 9127 San Diego Road/APN 045-441-035 & 045-441-004/William Mehring) WHEREAS, an application has been received from William Mehring (11190 Santa Lucia Road, Atascadero, CA 93423) Applicant and Property Owner, to consider a project consisting of a zone change from RS (Residential Suburban—minimum lot size 2 1/2 to 10 acres) to RS / PD-16 (Residential Suburban — minimum lot size 2 %2 to 10 acres with Planned . Development Overlay 16), the adoption of a Master Plan of Development, and a five-lot residential Tentative Tract Map on APN 045-441-035 & 045-441-004; and, WHEREAS,the site's General Plan Designation is Residential Estates (RE); and, WHEREAS, the site's current zoning district is Residential Suburban (RS); with a minimum lot size of 21/2 to 10 acres); and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to enact this amendment to the Zoning Map to protect the health, safety and welfare of its citizens by applying orderly development of the City; and, WHEREAS,the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and public notice of environmental documents, as set forth in the State and local guidelines for implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)have been adhered to; and, WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed public hearing upon the subject Zone Change application was held by the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero at which hearing evidence, oral and documentary, was admitted on behalf of said zoning amendments; and, WHEREAS,the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, at a public hearing held on December 17, 2002, studied and considered Zone Change 2002-0031 after first studying • ITEM NUMBER: B-1 DATE: 02/11/2003 and considering the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project and thereby recommended approval to the City Council, and, • WHEREAS,the Atascadero City Council, at a public hearing held February 11, 2003, studied and considered Zone Change 2002-0031 after first studying and considering the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project and the Planning Commissions recommendation, and, NOW, THEREFORE,the City Council takes the following actions: SECTION 1. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF A ZONE CHANGE CREATING A PD-16 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT. The City Council finds as follows: a) Modification of development standards or processing requirements is warranted to promote orderly and harmonious development. b) Modification of development standards or processing requirements will enhance the opportunity to best utilize special characteristics of an area and will have a beneficial effect on the area. c) Benefits derived from the overlay zone cannot be reasonably achieved through existing development standards or processing requirements. d) Proposed plans offer certain redeeming features to compensate for the requested modification. • SECTION 2.APPROVAL. The Atascadero City Council, in a regular session assembled on February 11, 2003 resolved to introduce for first reading an ordinance that would rezone the subject site consistent with the following: a) Exhibit A: Zone Change Map SECTION 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be effective a 12:01 a.m. on the 31St day after its final passage. • ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 02/11/2003 • On motion by Council Member , and seconded by Council Member the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ADOPTED: By: Jerry L. Clay, Sr., Mayor Attest: • Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk Approved as to form: Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney • y I ' �uuu■uu.. uuuuuur POV - POMPuuuuuu■. NUM INUMBanns ■Bann■■♦ F `� \ � to■■.BBQ � �• \■■■a■■. r '� ■■■a■■■ 3 \ •Bums■■\ \� t\ t 1 1 17A, Will ITEM NUMBER: B-1 DATE: 02/11/2003 • Attachment 5: Draft Resolution B ZCH 2002-0031/CUP 2002-0089/TTM 2002-0015 DRAFT RESOLUTION B A RESOLUTION OF THE ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2002-0086, A MASTER PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT FOR THE PD-16 OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICT ON APN 045-441-035 & 045-441-004 (9105 & 9127 San Diego Road/Mehring) WHEREAS, an application has been received from William Mehring, 11190 Santa Lucia Road, Atascadero, CA 93422, (Applicant& Owner), to consider a project consisting of a Planned Development overlay zone change to PD-16 with the adoption of a Master Plan of Development, and an five-lot cluster residential tract map, on a 14+/- acre lot located at 9105 & 9127 San • Diego Road(APN 045-441-035 & 045-441-004); and, WHEREAS, the site's General Plan Land Use Designation is Residential Estates (RE); and, WHEREAS, the site's zoning district is RS (Residential Suburban); and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended that a site be rezoned to a PD- 16 overlay district which requires the adoption of a Master Plan of Development; and, WHEREAS, the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and public notice of environmental documents, as set forth in the State and local guidelines for implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)have been adhered to; and, WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed Public Hearing upon the subject Zone Change application was held by the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero at which hearing evidence, oral and documentary, was admitted on behalf of said Master Plan of Development; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, at a Public Hearing held on December 17, 2002, studied and considered the Master Plan of Development for Zone • Change 2002-0031, after first studying and considering the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project and thereby recommended the City Council approve the project; and, ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 02/11/2003 WHEREAS, the Atascadero City Council, at a Public Hearing held on February 11, 2003, studied and considered the Master Plan of Development for Zone Change 2002-0031, after first studying and considering the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project, and, NOW, THEREFORE,the Atascadero City Council takes the following actions: SECTION 1. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF MASTER PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT. The City Council finds as follows: 1. The proposed project or use is consistent with the General Plan and the City's Appearance Review Manual; and, 2. The proposed project or use satisfies all applicable provisions of the Title (Zoning Ordinance) including the PD-16 Ordinance; and, 3. The establishment, and subsequent operation or conduct of the use will not, because of the circumstances and conditions applied in the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of the general public or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the use, or be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity of the use; and, 4. That the proposed project or use will not be inconsistent with the character or the immediate neighborhood or contrary to its orderly development; and, • 5. That the proposed use or project will not generate a volume of traffic beyond the safe capacity of all roads providing access to the project, either existing or to be improved in conjunction with the project, or beyond the normal traffic volume of the surrounding neighborhood that would result from full development in accordance with the Land Use Element. SECTION 2. APPROVAL. The Atascadero City Council, in a regular session assembled on February 11, 2003, resolved to recommend that the City Council approve Conditional use Permit 2002-0086, A Master Plan of Development for Zone Change 2002-0031 subject to the following: 1. EXHIBIT A: Master Plan of Development Site Plan 2. EXHIBIT B: Conditions of Approval 3. EXHIBIT C: Statistical Summary • ,.J4 ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 02/11/2003 • On motion by Council Member , and seconded by Council Member the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ADOPTED: By: Jerry L. Clay, Sr., Mayor Attest: • Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk Approved as to form: Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney • 'J� ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 02/11/2003 Exhibit A: Master Plan of Development • ZCH 2002-0031/CUP 2002-0089(Master Plan of Development) LOT Lor ----------------- \ WN Va 72 ;^I9 e : $' ,-mss \V. .1 I - .tr� UP j"n- r `r`. I y i i t i i €` !!i/'1 \ - _ € 3!/JIJ .� M a# a: F t14r/r/_i I� SS i 1 -u VVI' � p��"'�' '\\l \\\�yll.tf7 /S'w-. R.'eC• "'1:. S �,4 $ar �� e-�►�, `�Y� ��, $j i itic t�\lt 9 ,pt�, .A.e a 3#f. At :1! 3H �•5 �c _ - -..✓�� �� - � )t 3,14 q o z •s � e5 - — , I � R �$sE ss �}�s-/ v '. � ♦yy/�" -�'�:s�i..- j" � c-.� Ax` ! �-�°• •a„ 'e.te{. ��[(rIJJ//1J f/1 iiia \1 \ � I -µ • J,6 ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 02/11/2003 • Exhibit B: Conditions of Approval CUP 2002-0089(Master Plan of Development) Conditions of Approval Timing Responsibility tie ° ZCH 2002-0031/CUP 2002-0089 /Monitoring PS:Planning Services 9105&9127 San Diego Road BL Business License BS:Bulding Services GFI.Grading Penit FD:Fire Departrnent BP:Buildng Permit PD:Police Department FI:Final Inspection CE:Cfly Engineer TO:Temporary Occupancy WW.Wastewater F0:Final Occupancy CA:City Almmey Planning Services 1. The approval of this use permit shall become final and PS effective following the end of the referendum period for Zone Change 2002-0031. 2. Approval of this Master Plan of Development shall be valid BP PS concurrently with the life of Tentative Tract Map 2002-0015 and then indefinitely following final map. The Master Plan of Development(CUP 2002-0089)approval shall expire and become null and void unless a final map is recorded consistent with the Master Plan of Development. 3. The Community Development Department shall have the BP/FM PS authority to approve minor changes to the project that(1) increase the intensity of the project by less than 10%, (2) result in a superior site design or appearance,and/or(3) address a construction design issue that is not substantive to the Master Plan of Development. The Planning Commission shall have the final authority to approve any other changes to the Master Plan of Development and any associated Tentative Maps. 4. All subsequent Tentative Parcel Maps and construction BP/FM PS permits shall be consistent with the Master Plan of Development contained herein. 5. Future construction on the lots shall be consistent with the BPIFM PS Master Plan of Development(CUP 2002-0089)approved for the site. 6. The Open Space Easement shall be designated as a non- FM PS build, non-storage area,and shall be titled"Open Space Easement Area"and recorded as such on the Final Parcel Map. • �7�7 ITEM NUMBER: B-1 DATE: 02/11/2003 Exhibit C: Statistical Summary • ZCH 2002-0031/CUP 2002-0089(Master Plan of Development) of N LOf 2 Lat 3Lot4 Lt 5. Parcel Size (gross acres) 3.03 2.73 2.69 2.69 3.37 Parcel Size(net)(1.0 min.) 3.03 2.73-0.84 acre flag=1.89 2.69 2.69 3.37 % Slope: Building Site (under 20%) 0-10% 0-10% 0-10% 0-10% 0-10% Open Space Area (acres) 0 0 0 0 0.44 Minimum Lot Size 2.66 acres Maximum Density Allowed: One SFR per 2.66 acres Total Site Area: 14.47 acres Total Density allowed "14.47/2.66=5.43" i ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 02/11/2003 • Attachment 6: Draft Resolution c TTM 2002-0015 DRAFT RESOLUTION C A RESOLUTION OF ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2002-0015 THEREBY ALLOWING A FIVE LOT RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF APN 045-441-035 & 045-441-004 CONSISTENT WITH THE PD-16 MASTER PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT (CUP 2002-0089) (9105 & 9127 San Diego Road/APN 045-441-035 & 045-441-004/William Mehring) WHEREAS, an application has been received from Will Mehring (11190 Santa Lucia Road, Atascadero, CA 93423) Applicant and Property Owner, to consider a project consisting of an amendment to the City's Zoning Text to create a new Planned Development Overlay District • (PD 16), a zone change from RS (Residential Suburban— minimum lot size 2 1/2 to 10 acres) to RS /PD-16 (Residential Suburban—minimum lot size 2 %2 to 10 acres with Planned Development Overlay 16), the adoption of a Master Plan of Development, and a five-lot residential Tentative Parcel Map on APN 045-441-035 & 045-441-004; and, WHEREAS,the site's General Plan Designation is RE (Residential Estates; and, WHEREAS, the site's current zoning district is RS (Residential Suburban; with a minimum lot size of 2 1/2to 10 acres); and, WHEREAS,the Planning Commission has recommended that the site be rezoned to include a PD-16 overlay with a Master Plan of Development allowing a five-lot subdivision of the site; and, WHEREAS, the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and public notice of environmental documents, as set forth in the State and local guidelines for implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)have been adhered to; and, WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed public hearing upon the subject Tentative Parcel Map application was held by the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero at which hearing evidence, oral and documentary, was admitted on behalf of said application; and, • �J� ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 02/11/2003 WHEREAS,the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, at a public hearing • held on December 17, 2002, studied and considered Tentative Tract Map 2002-0015, after first studying and considering the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project and thereby recommended approval; and, WHEREAS,the Atascadero City Council, at a public hearing held on February 11, 2003, studied and considered Tentative Tract Map 2002-0015, after first studying and considering the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project; and, NOW,THEREFORE,the Atascadero City Council takes the following actions: SECTION 1. FINDINGS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP,the Atascadero City Council finds as follows: a) The proposed subdivision, as conditioned, is consistent with the General Plan and applicable zoning requirements. b) The design and improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan and applicable zoning requirements. c) The proposed subdivision, as conditioned, is consistent with the Planned Development Overlay District#16 Master Plan of Development(CUP 2002-0089). d) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. • e) The site is physically suitable for the density of development proposed. f) The design and improvement of the proposed subdivision will not cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish and wildlife or their habitat. g) The design of the subdivision will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through, or the use of property within, the proposed subdivision; or substantially equivalent alternative easements are provided. h) The proposed subdivision design and type of improvements proposed will not be detrimental to the health, safety or welfare of the general public. SECTION 2. APPROVAL. The Atascadero City Council, in a regular session assembled on February 11, 2003 resolved to approve the Tentative Tract Map (TTM 2002-0015) subject to the following: a) Exhibit A: Tentative Tract Map 2002-0015 b) Exhibit B: Conditions of Approval • ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 02/11/2003 On motion by Council Member , and seconded by Council Member the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ADOPTED: By: Jerry L. Clay, Sr., Mayor Attest: 0 Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk Approved as to form: Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney • ITEM NUMBER: B-1 DATE: 02/11/2003 Exhibit A: Tentative Tract Map ZCH 2002-0031/CUP 2002-00891TTM 2002-0015 3r -_ - ��. 1 --- --------- --- �L�qY g , w 1 Sc- r' \ \` a 44 s 9 22 3, 3 6• y (, r6, / ,yS l✓/ �.�)�;��.st\ ` f1 ix� HT; l fi a $$4 sk .`6F i,r.5'�T� #1ti'},i i' 1 t 1;✓ \ ` \ lilt i t€ 4P �. ` � 1 Oz_i. " IN 33. Sa ;fix n $Ei �� $� Z�_ � �.1•�i��.y�.� t f 7/..� `Ill\��o�\}'\,ti. � �=E�: ti • IN Ir; lilt €' :;'• ,;,} 4 Ott)f tjfr�fJt !! \\Ili l € E;' Xl /il /i°t. tY� 3cn W '_� �� ��� sit •__� � r..: Lj --- r CTT_ -^'-�' • rN i V !y ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 02/11/2003 • EXHIBIT B: Conditions of Approval ZCH 2002-0031/CUP 2002-0089/7TM 2002-0015 Conditions of Approval Timing Responsibility Mitigation /Monitoring Measure PM:Parcel Map 9105&9127 San Diego Road GP:Gradng Per'dg Sennces PS:Planning ' BP:Building Pem»< BS:Building Services TO:Temporary Occupancy FD:Fre Depa trient Tentative Tract Map 2002-0015 FO:Final Occupancy PD:Police Department PI:Pubic Improvements CE City Engineer WW:Wastewaer C0.City Attorney AMWC:Atascailm Mutual Water Carpany Planning Services 1. The approval of this application shall become final, subject PM PS to the completion of the conditions of approval, fourteen (14) days following the Planning Commission approval unless prior to the time, an appeal to the decision is filed as set forth in Section 9-1.111(b)of the Zoning Ordinance. 2. The Tentative Tract Map application shall not be deemed • approved until the end of the ordinance referendum period and enactment of Zone Change 2002-0031. 3. Approval of this Tentative Tract Map shall be valid for two PM PS years after its effective date. At the end of the period, the approval shall expire and become null and void unless an extension of time is granted pursuant to a written request received prior to the expiration date. 4. The Community Development Department shall have the PM PS authority to approve minor changes to the project that (1) result in a superior site design or appearance, and/or (2) address a construction design issue that is not substantive to the Tentative Tract Map. 5. The Final Map shall be subject to additional fees for park or PM PS recreation purposes (QUIMBY Act) as required by City Ordinance. 6. The granting of this entitlement shall apply to the property On going PS located at 9105 & 9127 San Diego Road (APN 045-441- 035&045-441-004)regardless of owner. 7. The Open Space Easement shall be designated as an FM PS "Open Space Easement" and recorded on the Final Parcel Map as such. 8. Future construction on the lots shall be consistent with the BP PS Master Plan of Development (CUP 2002-0089) approved • for the site. , .t PY V ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 02/11/2003 Conditions of Approval Timing Responsibility Mitigation /Monitoring Measure • 9105$9127 San Diego Road PM:Parcel MapGP:crating PwM PS:Planning Services BP:Building Permit BS:Bulling Services TO:Temporary Occupancy FD:Fre Deparlinerd Tentative Tract Map 2002-0015 FO:Final Occupancy PD:Police Departrnerd PI:Public Improvements CE City Engineer WW:Wastewater CA City Adomey AMWC:Atascadero Mulual Wafer Canpany 9. A final map drawn in substantial conformance with the PM PS approved tentative map, and in compliance with all conditions set forth herein, shall be submitted for review and approval in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City's Subdivision Ordinance. Mitigation Measures-CEQA Mitigation Measure 3.b: The project shall be conditioned to BP BS 3.b comply with all applicable District regulations pertaining to the control of fugitive dust(PM-10)as contained in section 6.4 of the Air Quality Handbook. All site grading and demolition plans notes shall list the following regulations: A. All material excavated or graded shall be sufficiently watered to prevent excessive amounts of dust. Watering shall occur at least twice daily with complete coverage, preferably in the late morning and after work is finished for the day. B. All clearing, grading,earth moving,or excavation activities shall cease during periods of high winds(i.e. • greater than 20 mph averaged over one hour)so as to prevent excessive amounts of dust. C. All material transported off-site shall be either sufficiently watered or securely covered to prevent excessive amounts of dust. D. The area disturbed by clearing,grading,earth moving, or excavation operations shall be minimized so as to prevent excessive amounts of dust. E. Permanent dust control measured identified in the approved project revegetation and landscape plans shall be implemented as soon as possible following completion of any soil disturbing activities. F. Exposed ground areas that are planned to be reworked at dates greater than one month after initial grading shall be sown with fast-germinating native grass seed and watered until vegetation becomes established. G. All disturbed areas not subject to revegetation . shall be stabilized using approved chemical soil binders, jute netting,or other methods in advance by the APCD. H. All roadways,driveways,sidewalks,etc.to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible. In addition,structural foundations shall be completed as soon as possible following building pad construction. I. On-site vehicle speed shall be limited to 15 mph for any unpaved surface. J. All unpaved areas with vehicle traffic shall be watered at least twice per day, using non-potable water. K. Streets adjacent to the project site shall be swept daily to remove silt which may have accumulated from construction activities so as to prevent excessive amounts • of dust from leaving the site. i � C� ITEM NUMBER: B-1 DATE: 02/11/2003 Conditions of Approval Timing Responsibility Mitigation • /Monitoring Measure PM:Parcel Map 9105&9127 San Diego Road GP.GradingPernit PS:Planning Services BP:Buldng Pemit BS:Building Services TO:Tenwary Occupancy FD:Fire Depart hent Tentative Tract Map 2002-0015 Fa.Final Occupancy PD:PoliceDeparhruent PI:Public Improvements CE:City Engineer W.Wastewater Ca CityAtmmey AMWC:Atascadero Mutual WaterConvany L. Wheel washers may be required when significant offsite import or export of fill is involved. M. Large canopy shade trees shall be provided along street frontages and within parking areas to shade paved areas and minimize urban heat build-up. Mitigation Measure 4.e.1: A Tree Protection Plan prepared by GP PS 4.e.1:J a Certified Arborist according to the City Of Atascadero guidelines shall be submitted during the building permit process and approved for the development of each new parcel or redevelopment of existing parcels. All tree removals shall be mitigated according to the Atascadero Tree Ordinance, by payment into the Tree Mitigation Fund, and on Mitigation Measure 5.b: Should any cultural resources be GP PS 5.b unearthed during site development work,the provisions of CEQA-Section 15064.5,will be followed to reduce impacts to a non-significant level. Mitigation Measure 6.b.1: An erosion and sedimentation GP PS,BS,CE 6.b.2 control plan shall be required for single family residential building permits on the site. All measures required by the City and the Regional Water Quality Control Board to prevent soil, dirt,and debris from entering the storm drain system during • and after construction shall be implemented.The plan shall implement Regional Water Quality Control Board Best Management Practices(BMP's)and shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer and Planning Staff at the time of Building Permit application. Mitigation Measure 6.b.2: All cut and fill slopes shall be GP PS,BS,CE 6.4.4 hydroseeded with an appropriate erosion control method (Straw wattles, erosion control blanket, hydro-mulch, or straw mulch appropriately anchored)immediately after completion of earthwork between the months of October 15 through April 15. All disturbed slopes shall have appropriate erosion control methods in place. For the duration of the project the contractor will be responsible for proper erosion control implementation and the clean-up of any mud or debris that is tracked onto public streets by construction vehicles. Mitigation Measure 6.c.d: A soils report shall be required to be GP BS 6.c.d submitted with a future building permit by the building department.The building plans will be required to follow the recommendations of the soils report to assure safety for occupants and buildings. Mitigation Measure 8.f.1/6.b.1: An erosion and sedimentation GP BS 8.e control plan shall include storm water measures for the operation and maintenance of the project for the review and approval of the City Engineer for single family residential building permits on the site. All measures required by the City and the Regional Water Quality Control Board to prevent soil, dirt, and debris from entering the storm drain system shall be • implemented during and after construction. Regional Water Quality Control Board Best Management Practices BMP's 's: ITEM NUMBER: B-1 DATE: 02/11/2003 Conditions of Approval Timing Responsibility Mitigation • /Monitoring Measure 9105&9127 San Diego Road PM"Parcel Map PS Planning Services 9 GP:Grading Pemtt 9 BP.Building Pend BS Budding Senkes TO:Temporary Ocapancy FD:Fire Department Tentative Tract Map 2002-0015 F0:Final Occupancy PD:Poke Department Pt:Public Improvements CE City Engineer WW:Wastewater Ca City Attorney AMWC:Atascadero Mutual Wafer Company shall be included.The Building Permit application plans shall identify Best Management Practices(BMPs)appropriate to the uses conducted on site that effectively prohibit the entry of pollutants into storm water runoff. Mitigation Measure 8.e.f.1: A Stormwater Pollution GP PS,BS,CE 6.b.1 Prevention Plan(SWPPP)/Erosion Control Plan shall be submitted and approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of the building permit. The plan shall include storm water measures for the operation and maintenance of the project for the review and approval of the City Engineer. The Building Permit application plans shall identify Best Management Practices(BMPs)appropriate to the uses conducted on site that effectively prohibit the entry of pollutants into storm water runoff. Mitigation Measure 8.e.f.2: The developer is responsible for GP PS,BS,CE 6.b.3 ensuring that all contractors are aware of all storm water quality measures and that such measures are implemented. Failure to comply with the approved construction Best Management Practices will result in the issuance of correction notices, citations,or stop orders. Mitigation Measure 11.d: All construction activities shall BP,GP BS 11.d comply with the City of Atascadero Noise Ordinance for hours of operation. Construction activities shall be limited to the following hours of operation: • 7 a.m.to 7 p.m. Monday through Friday • 9 a.m.to 6 p.m. Saturday • No construction on Sunday Further, particularly loud noises shall not occur before 8 a.m. on weekdays and not at all on weekends. The hours of construction may be modified by the Community Development Director upon a determination that unusually loud construction activities are having a significant impact on the neighbors. Failure to comply with the above-described hours of operation may result in withholding of inspections and possible construction prohibitions, subject to the review and approval of the Planning Commission. A sign shall be posted on-site with the hours of operation and a telephone number of the person to be contacted in the event of any violations. The details of such a sign shall be approved by staff during the Grading Plan/Building Permit review process. Engineering Project Specific Conditions: • 1 I ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 02/11/2003 Conditions of Approval Timing Responsibility Mitigation • /Monitoring Measure 9105&9127 San Die o Road PM.Parcel Map g GP:Grading Permit PS:Planning Services BP:Building Permit BS:Building Services TO:Temporary Occupancy FD:Fire Departrnerd Tentative Tract Map 2002-0015 FO:Final Occupancy PD:Price Departrnent PI:Public Inpmements CE:City Engineer WW:Wastewater C0.City Atmmey AMC:Atascadm Mutual Water Cor pany 10. The applicant shall access provide easements for all FM CE parcels to share access on the existing driveway. 11. Applicant to provide 2" full width asphalt overlay on San Diego Road across the entire property frontage prior to Certificate of Occupancy. Engineering Standard Conditions: 12.All public improvements shall be constructed in conformance with the City of Atascadero Engineering Department Standard Specifications and Drawings and/or as directed by the City Engineer. 13. In the event that the applicant is allowed to bond for the public improvements required as a condition of the final map, the applicant shall enter into a Subdivision Improvement Agreement with the City Council. 14.An engineer's estimate of probable cost shall be submitted • for review and approval by the City Engineer to determine the amount of the bond. 15.The Subdivision Improvement Agreement shall record concurrently with the Final Map. 16.An encroachment permit shall be obtained prior to the issuance of building permit. 17.The applicant shall enter into a Plan Check/Inspection agreement with the City. 18.A six(6)foot Public Utility Easement(PUE)shall be provided contiguous to the San Diego Road property frontage. 19.The applicant shall be responsible for the relocation and/or alteration of existing utilities. 20.The applicant shall install all new utilities(water,gas, electric, cable TV and telephone)underground. Utilities shall be extended to the property line frontage of each lot or its public utility easement. 21.The applicant shall monument all property corners for construction control and shall promptly replace them if disturbed. 22.The applicant shall acquire title interest in any off-site land that may be required to allow for the construction of the improvements.The applicant shall bear all costs associated . with the necessary acquisitions.The applicant shall also gain concurrence from all adjacent property owners whose ingress . - r ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 02/11/2003 Conditions of Approval Timing Responsibility Mitigation' /Monitoring Measure • map 9105&9127 San Diego Road �GradingPmmt PS:Planning Services BP:Building Pemtit BS:Budding Services i 9 T0:T Y Occupancy FD:Fire Deparhnent Tentative Tract Map 2002-0015 FD:FnalOccu PD:Poke�Pa ParrcY ' PI:Public IrtprovemCE ents Gly Engineer WW:Wastewater Ca CAyAttomey AMWC:Atascadero Mutual Water Company and egress is affected by these improvements. 23. Slope easements shall be provided as needed to accommodate cut of fill slopes. 24. Drainage easements shall be provided as needed to accommodate both public and private drainage facilities. 25.A preliminary subdivision guarantee shall be submitted for review in conjunction with the processing of the map. 26.All existing and proposed utility, pipeline,open space,or other easements are to be shown on the parcel map. If there are building or other restrictions related to the easements, they shall be noted on the parcel map. The applicant shall show all access restrictions on the parcel map. 27.The final map shall be signed by the City Engineer prior to the map being placed on the agenda for City Council acceptance. 28. Prior to recording the final map,the applicant shall submit . a map drawn in substantial conformance with the approved tentative map and in compliance with all conditions set forth herein.The map shall be submitted for review and approval by the City in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City's Subdivision Ordinance. 29. Prior to recording the parcel map,the applicant shall set monuments at all new property corners.A registered civil engineer or licensed land surveyor shall indicate by certificate on the parcel map,that corners have been set or shall be set by a date specific and that they will be sufficient to enable the survey to be retraced. 30. Prior to recording the parcel map,the applicant shall pay all outstanding plan check/inspection fees. 31. Prior to recording the map,the applicant shall complete all improvements required by these conditions of approval. 32. Prior to recording the parcel map,the applicant shall have the map reviewed by all applicable public and private utility companies(cable,telephone,gas,electric,Atascadero Mutual Water Company). The applicant shall obtain a letter from each utility company indicating their review of the map. The letter shall identify any new easements that may be required by the utility company. A copy of the letter shall be submitted to the City. New easements shall be shown on the parcel map. 33. Upon recording the final map,the applicant shall provide • the City with a black line clear Mylar 0.4 mil copy and a blue ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 02/11/2003 • Conditions of ApprovalTiming Responsibility Mitigation /Monitoring Measure PM:Parcel Map 9105&9127 San Diego Road GPGraotmgPermit PS:Planning Services BP:Building Pert BS:Binding Services TO:Temporary Occupancy FD:Fire Department Tentative Tract Map 2002-0015 FO:Final Occupancy PD:Po5ceDepartment PI:Public Improvements CE City Engineer WW:Wastewater CA City Attorney AMWC:Atescadero Mutual Water Company line print of the recorded map. 34. Prior to the final inspection of any public improvements, the applicant shall submit a written statement from a registered civil engineer that all work has been completed and is in full compliance with the approved plans. 35. Prior to the final inspection,the applicant shall submit a written certification from a registered civil engineer or land surveyor that all survey monuments have been set as shown on the final map. 36. Prior to the issuance of building permits the applicant shall submit a grading and drainage plan prepared by a registered civil engineer for review and approval by the City Engineer. i • ITEM NUMBER: C-1 DATE: 02/11/2003 1 1918 , 19 rAn�, Atascadero City Council Staff Report—Administrative Services Mid-Year Budget Review RECOMMENDATION: Council adopt the attached draft Resolution amending the 2002-03 Budget. DISCUSSION: Financial Status The largest financial issue facing the City is the proposed state takeaways. Governor Davis' • proposal includes taking away MVLF, Motor Vehicle in Lieu Fees ($1,100,000 annually), booking fees ($36,350 annually), Redevelopment ERAF ($263,000 annually) and a raid of the Low/Moderate Income Housing Fund ($215,000). There are other proposals in Sacramento that do not touch our MVLF. The exact impact on the City of the State Budget Crisis is not known. At this time, staff recommends following the City's financial strategic plan and not making any budget adjustments for the possibility of state takeaways. The Council has adopted a financial strategic plan that provides for downswings in revenues by putting aside reserves in good times and then using those reserves during down periods. This plan allows for stable operations and long-term financial sustainability. As the State budget picture clarifies, we will continue to monitor the City's financial status and make revisions to future budgets accordingly. On the good news front, the City's property tax and sales tax revenues continue to show strong growth. Property taxes are up over 7%, fueled primarily by continued strong supplemental property tax revenues. Sales taxes are also up by over 6% with increases across the board for most industries. Building and construction activity also continues to be strong. With few exceptions, general fund expenditures appear to be coming in as expected. Health insurance is one of the few problem areas. As previously reported to Council, the City's health insurance carrier is no longer doing business and the City was forced to change carriers. This caused drastically increased premiums and staff is requesting an additional appropriation of $40,000 to cover the City's portion of this increase. The other requested appropriation is for litigation services. The City has historically budgeted only a minor amount for litigation services • and then has requested additional appropriations in years where there is litigation activity. The City currently has several lawsuits in process and staff recommends adding an additional $50,000 to the budget to cover costs. 1I O r�� ITEM NUMBER: C-1 DATE: 02/11/2003 FISCAL IMPACT: i Revenue Increase $130,000. Additional Appropriations of$90,000. ALTERNATIVES: Council has the option to add or delete any budget item. This will decrease or increase the remaining reserve balance on June 30, 2003 by the amount adjusted. ATTACHMENTS: Draft Resolution-Amending 2002-2003 Fiscal Year Budget 2002-2003 Mid-Year Budget Report • 7 DRAFT RESOLUTION RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL • OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO,CALIFORNIA AMENDING THE BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2002-2003 WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2001- 016, setting forth the budget for fiscal year 2002-2003 and; WHEREAS,the City Council hereby wishes to amend said budget; NOW,THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED,by the City Council of the City of Atascadero that the Fiscal Year 2002-2003 Budget is amended as follows: SECTION 1. The estimated revenue and appropriation amounts are adjusted as detailed in the Mid-Year Budget Report, a copy of said report being attached hereto as an"Exhibit"and by this reference made a part hereof. SECTION 2. These changes are effective immediately upon adoption of this resolution. On Motion by Council Member , and seconded by ,the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote: AYES: • NOES: ABSENT: ADOPTED: ATTEST: CITY OF ATASCADERO MARCIA M. TORGERSON JERRY L. CLAY, SR. City Clerk Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: ROY A. HANLEY • City Attorney i M � O � N • V O yo N W CD co oftoW D X73 O O et et r N O r r 0 O O I- M � Cl O Cl) O CD N Go N r C) CO 00 co a O M N O et N et d Cl) ch O O N r et r ll- (o 0) Lf) ON OLr) etN (o CDOrM 00 co N N CorOI- MON cotiON a) � I- NI� 1,- :3O N � P- C1 d_M M CO r O N � O L( (O O M r (n3- W N J C) r a) co)M O 00 et O et �-O a) p a) M r �' O i N } D a a) � a) M C) r O M 00 r M O M O (D r I� Cl) Z F a) er r O O (o r r M C) a) (D M N r Cl) O Oc WO Q W V N M r r N (0 M r r r a.X N Z Q r r O LL D O W N 64 o Z m O a) r et O et C) Cl) 00 M h 00 r C) 00 (o a) (Q et C) d' 00 a) r- ti O O N O O a) Oo (7) (D et M C W Q J ao C) I� N a) O O N (D C) N LD (D r 0 r O C D C) O Go N O Cl) r �' A N O O r M C)O O lf) !" Z N O j (Da) fl- a) ON (DrCl) Cl) O O NcoMN O C) H H (O N N N (D r O r d- d- It to M I y a > W Q r r O M r O } 64 C as p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a c`') LC) 'd• N et O r C4 r er : (Q r M et r 0 C) r- co O 00 r O O O N M O O 00 M I- (D O I- r N O M N M et O It st eh et -d' It It r 14- C L 3 h � r 0 C) C) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r O O O O OO M Z3f] O O M I- O a) Cl) I,- O O 00 00 O co C) (D O00 C) W 00 O (D r Cl It O C) 0o O a) a) O O (D O O 1t et o Q N Oret OtistN N000 d• Ntia) N <n (Dr V � Z Cl)M 1- (0 � a) r O (o h 00 O '- a) O (o W r LO r N et r 00 N O C) I�et r r a) ,� C LQ Qm MMS r r � M r .Q a 4 .i m 64 r r () w U 0 q y y x • r N f7 It IA W O O O O O O O C) o -C �� y u F- O O O O O O O O 4] C W Z O O O O O O O C a) C') Cl) V) W O O O O O O O O O d � I` r .N. Cl) V O d - h h w O N0 D a) y i p) N a -' to a +� •� y p O = y �. N Q 69 64 U k m1-1) OOOO 0000000 O 00000 O O C) o a) I,- o rn Cl) l- Lo 0 00 co LO 00 0) (o C) 00 o z )_ Octo (or o �ornCCoam rn (CL o (oC C et Lf yU W W I- O r et Ln I- et N N O 00 It N 1- a)N LO (p Q' O aLO OrI�OO (DI� - O j O O r N It r 00 M C) 00 et � Id' r 00 Ltj � U O ~ U m M M r ti M ^ j v 69 (H Q �O U H ti O M a) LOC) N � ((D NCr rn N O ((0 a) N -- � a)) Z y C CVC p J Cl!r P-N Cl t'"(O 'q M N L() Ln I�O c0 CO .� O p Q L()LO-d- a) a) O et O r 0) O (0 00.N c0 Lo a) V m N O a) I,- a) O r (D 00 M N et O 00 N N r O et t­ M N N (D 'd• r et LO LO 00 N C) W R' U r r O Cl) r LO +'C.. a) 4) f] Q a L C L y a) y N N C ; i t C ,y ,h o w v i aa) 2 a i x C � o m a� U) r- ry m +� o y o a _I c a�j 4) O y = y 'a G O O N a) vi Li N U rn C L E 7 W >. p k N -OC R w N x 'B E O c a) fC a) 'U N c •mc > �> io C aO * ioCa ' > y N oo r ma ;L F- a)nZn o ~ a� o Z cc ° (W �c }n O � ° naaU W .u. WO W OUO �Xc!) $ try W N M of In 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 OCD I- N O IT O C 0') (D 0 0 0 0 Co 'V: N r cr 'cY � co C = 1-� Oi L6 6 N di cli Oi N a0 6 o0 N I-� c6 G r M r N i- co O 0o N LO O In (o r t() Ln Cl) Cl) co . O V U M r O O) -T IT r- O to IT 1� N N N V WN O � � O r '7 (o N V O Lr r N O oo M (o M a o co ITr It r r N N (o O h Cl) Cl) Cl) r LO (() to ti Z N } O r r M coo N M CO C\l co O (o co r r r N O O Co O (. N N Z Q W o U. Q N 60t 69 69 61 Z Q w (C) O r� O O IT N (o v (M (3) 't (o O (o N 00 co O M O 0o O v v co O [- h In O cM r r r o0 W Q Oct a0 M w (o Il M O O OctL O L V M O V O M o p Q LO LO LO V � I o O r U) In N N f,- O O N Z N 0 p N M O Co to O) V W U � r r M r r M N N r r W IX U W w Q } 69 69 60- (D -(D oV C O LO co M O u) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I- Cl � 'd' LO r O r- e In O O 00 00 r O (c) N C L6 O r ui M tc) Cl) In to v v N `7 ef' Cl) v (n (o r T O O ' O O 0 0 0 O O 0 0 ' Cl 0 0 0 O O p F O O Cl) Cl) 00 U') r r r 0 r cp M O f� V UJ w O M M O e r l[) 0o N L O M ' C) p O N LO co I- O Lr) O N N It N O co CD 't Z p N1- 00 LO NLO O - (o O O� t� 'VN V ao V v Ce) Q m 69 6% 64 64 N p F" w Z M N w O IL N w C a Q (� 64 64 11N Cl 0 ' 0 O O O O O O O O ' Cl Cl O O O Cl I- Cl O M co O (n r IQ* r r 0 r 'q- Cl) 0 I- IT Z W O M M O VL r � M f- M V a0 N V (o M t7 LLI 0 W N LO 00 � O U') O) N N V N O co O d p O O (D ti 00 (n N U') (D r 1� M to O) O � > > v N f- N V co It v N v U 00 Z 69 W V% E9 W W N LO (M In (n (f) O O LO O U U') O ' t(') r O O O (o F- (o O It O Cl) h It M v O Q P- O � Cl O co O r- o Q J (o LQ r r r G cM to 0o N M O M N u7 M O N C3, p Q r- � (O 1- LO U) N M Cl) d It tc) N (n t() O C4 0 7 f- Cl) r c0 M r 00 M r r r r ti H 1- N r t{ r N Cl) W N NLU r r p Q Q W Z E9 ff-? Z 69 Q LL W U U Z D LL ai (n ayi Z O � m a) y W m ayi H LLo v v m " 'a Z X c m m vi c m ami Z Q cn - > y U) � E H > - (D m U) :3 x o O o > m d (nom k o LL X o 0 0 w = J y N o 0 0 w r O • W O c `m H c Z = c Co F c n o tz fo- Z D m E m m .c •. w. d E ca -� _ > C9 SOI- aw0U U > U O a.w00 ~O W H W im 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O r- LO O N O CD d' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14' O CD N O O M r M M I-- N V I-- Ln r- O Cn LC) M Ln C i N M i-� Cfl O I` O C Cl) Cl) IT Cl) �' L() N co U) LO IT Lf) L() LC) NT Cl) Ln Nr G O CD M CA tt I,- Cl r 00 LO C Cl) N It O Cl) I- LC) tC) O I Cy LC) O O LC) M O CA CA Co Il IT CD I- Lf) CO I,- r p r1i r. O tt U) r CA O r- M M CD It OO Il M M CD O � 00 Cl) W N J O r O r- O 00 O 00 00 O Co t` v r- O v Cl) 00 Cl) � LO Z N } o p CND r (0 - - r r N OV CM r O CA r V N C) N J N to r O O � Wc Q W � N r 4. N y Z Q QN LL ' 64 64 63 6H EF3 Z Q W LC) M 'It N CD h O M 0) r O Cl) N N CD r l- LC) CA M LC) N N O Ln M O r r CO LC) O oo to Lt7 CD It co I- O 00 N W Q ti O O LC) r Vp O CD O CA M N I" M V Ln Il M r r 00 D G O Q r M 'ch CA O LO O It d' N CO LC) I- 0) r1' - M 'cf � LO 00 Z CV O M Cl) O O N 00 Ln v co O 0) Lr) '�t O N 00 r N W U H N N r r I, r O r N [} CD W W U r W O W Q } 63 6} 6k 63 63 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O V: CD CA r O N CO CR o O M C O r r 00 LC) CD O O r Ln M V to Ln M � N V CO u) O� 04 (D ~ M 0) r 0 0 O O O O Cl O 0 0 0 ' O O O O O O O O p 00 O 00 I-- 00 M 00 O co LC) Co CF) I` CA O LO r N LA W W LC) Ln O N LC) V N O P- 00 M O P O CO f� V M O O LC) v O C9 CD M O M CA 00 i- LC) 00 N O O N C4 n Z p LC) r I- N 'd' 00 LC) r O N CA CA M N 00 O O O N LU :3 CD Co N r N C4 LD N 00 M O M C) Cl) to Q m r r N 60- 64 64). 69 69. Cl) • -C3 Z a W N W O a H N Cl a Q 6} 611 N Cl O ' O O O O O O O O O ' O O O O O O O O 00 O CO r- 00 M 00 O co LC) O CA I,- CT O LL) r N Ln Z W Ln LL7 O N LC) V N 00 f� O M O � O 00 ti Vt M W (� Ln v O O O Cl) CD M CA 00 I1- Ln 00 N O O N CO [I- LO r I- N IT 00 L() r CD N CA O Cl) N O CD O O N O M CD 0 N r N O LC) N 00 Cl) O M O M el' Ln U m 1-: r C �. 63 63 64 64 6} 0 0 ' O 't O N N 00 00 O Lf) ' N Ln N C O r r Cl) FW- O v M O r N Co N O O O r N N Ln r O O N Q J r- O (D V 00 � O CD O O M N CD D) r N CT N N p Q t- V N I` 't r- O N 00 C7 00 I,- I` M M CD CD O N O M N M r h O O M 00 CD r CD LO Co v I� v N - O F F M M r r CO CA r N C0 O r r U LL, a: W 69 69 63 1 69 6k to >+ U c C N O CT Cn Z CA Q N i D N O i c N U U) cn +3, V- U O U) N y Z a) L) Cn a) U D O p � aZi °) 0 U) E m m o m °' o _ L o > a E Z N R' L O c CD U) cn3 W 0 C y > L o K v m W,L 4) 0 Cc o 0 W in 12 o >, @ c Q W c co m e F- = a) a Z c M m > c a� EL ra o F- c > a) s a) E m (o Q m a) = (v . m E o- La o a) a) F=- > U50 Xw00 > 0- 0w0 XwOOO > of W W d'r V F 1 I,- U') Ln 00 r N O "r Q M O N O da; u') vi co D: N M co O r LO N co~ 0 V- W p Lp Ln O r O 00 O 00 N (n W N J CV) N Cl) Ln r Ln I,- V O Z N J M F v N M Ln I N W o W U X N y Z Q W o LL ' Q N EA Q W O O LO 00 Lo N N O r W } O CSO r- L'i N I� Oct00 M Q Q ~ r O 0 N V O Z U O F rLO W r N r p Q M (a fB d- 00 llf Ln CO o O - r CO CO CO r LO C: N co IT M V O ' ' O O O O O O O Ln LO 11 r CO CO W W Ln 00 M Cfl V' ': Ln O U M co cM OMi M Cl) Z � Qm LO M r Ln ER • N i D � W Z W Cl) CD CL O N O M C4 a Q y� 0 N O ' ' O O O O O O Z W LO 00 M I et V Ln LU p M CSO Cl) O Cl) r V m Ln M r Ln W N ' ' to (O IT r r CO ►- Ln r M 00 O N O N Q J M r 0) O r- CD Lp O N O N r r- Cl) M r - F- F- r r N UJ QU Q W d L 1�+ N U d N d OJ D L O) CW V LL N o C • 0 r-, N O a QO O N Q E Q- m H Z 11. 50 CLW 00 � W ..d L ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 02/11/2003 T o 1918 19 9 Atascadero City Council Staff Report Public Works Department Atascadero Road Program RECOMMENDATIONS: City Council: 1. Receive an updated report on the Atascadero Road Program. 2. Review the Local Road Priority List and direct staff on the spring of 2003 Local Road paving. 3. Direct Staff on the Assessment District formation process. REPORT-IN-BRIEF: Atascadero has 141 miles of city-maintained roads and 29 miles of non-city-maintained roads. The backlogged maintenance on these roads is estimated at more than $21,000,000.00. The Atascadero Road Program is a program designed to focus the City's efforts in maintaining and protecting the roads of Atascadero in an organized, efficient and cost-effective manner. This program has made a difference in the condition of the roads of Atascadero. This is the eighth City Council meeting on the Atascadero Road Program. • The first meeting was a workshop on road maintenance and potential strategies for road repair. • At the second meeting, Council was provided a detailed background on the roads of Atascadero and a breakdown of the road maintenance backlog. Council provided staff direction on repair, maintenance and rehabilitation strategies. • In the third meeting, the Council accepted maintenance responsibility for roads that the County had previously accepted and portions of San Gabriel Road and San Marcos Road. The Council gave staff direction on trench cuts, development standards and assessment districts. • • At the fourth meeting, Council approved the Trench Cut Ordinance. • At the fifth meeting, gave staff direction on allowing non-licensed persons to work in the Colony right-of-way and requirements for road improvements for new developments ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 02/11/2003 • At the sixth meeting, the council approved allowing non-licensed persons to work in the Colony right-of-way and set requirements for road improvements for new developments. • At the seventh meeting, staff received direction on strategies to use for local road rehabilitation projects and was directed to perform maintenance work on the roads of River Gardens and Amapoa Ave. Tonight staff will provide an update on the Atascadero Road Program, look for direction on the spring of 2003 local road maintenance work and the Assessment District formation process. DISCUSSION: Atascadero Road Program Update Most of Atascadero's road projects are completed. Staff is now working on the design and implementation work for this spring and summer. Attached is a revised Atascadero Road Program Map and list of Circulation Plan Roads (See Attachment A & B). Listed below are the highlights of the projects. • Santa Ysabel Rehabilitation, Curbaril Ave to State Route 41 This project will be completed this month. This project completely rehabilitated this important collector that provides an alternative to traveling on El Camino Real The Lewis Avenue Bridge will complete this corridor. • Road Rehabilitation Project 2002-2003 This project has been completed. Listed below the proposed roads that were rehabilitated: ❑ Curbaril from El Camino Real to Highway 101 (grind and repave). ❑ El Camino Real at Viejo Camino (Install drainage structures and repair intersection) ❑ West Mall from El Camino Real to Lewis (grind and repave, curb and gutter, drainage structures, and handicap ramps.). ❑ Capistrano from West Mall to Sycamore (grind and repave with drainage structures). ❑ Sycamore from Capistrano to North of County Yard (Cape Seal). ❑ Sycamore from North of County Yard to Curbaril (grind and repave). ❑ San Anselmo from Highway 101 to Ardilla Road(grind and repave). ❑ Ardilla Road from San Anselmo to Portola Road (grind and repave). ❑ Santa Lucia from Ardilla to Santa AnaSeal Ca e . ( p ) ❑ Ensenada from .Capistrano to Via Bridge (overlay with minor drainage repairs). p g p ) ❑ Santa Rosa from El Camino Real to Highway 101 (grind and repave). • Local Road Paving The Public Works Department purchased a paving machine and related equipment to • overlay local roads. Last spring staff completed grading for drainage improvements and a ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 02/11/2003 two-inch overlay in the River Gardens neighborhood (Sycamore Road, Hidalgo Ave, • Buena Ave, Escalon Place) and Amapoa Ave. Local Road Priority List Public Works Maintenance Division will be continuing to perform "maintenance work" paving city-maintained local roads in the spring and fall. These are roads where Federal and State funding is not available. The purchase of asphalt and other materials will be funded from Public Works Street Maintenance Operating Supplies. Contract services required during paving will be funded out of the Public Works Street Contract Services. Contract services required during paving will include street sweeping, water truck rental and tack coat application. Atascadero has 76 miles of city-maintained local roads (See Attachment "C"). Many of them are in need of repair and maintenance. Council directed staff to use the "Worst First Approach" of maintenance strategy. The intent of this strategy is to rehabilitate the roads that are in poor condition first. The criteria that was used in selecting city-maintained local roads for paving are as follows: • Poor condition of road surface. (Pot holes,base failure, alligator cracking) • City-maintained local road per the Circulation Element. • Traffic Control: Public Works maintenance has a small staff. Proper traffic control can require considerable manpower. We will look for roads that can easily be closed to through • traffic or traffic control is not too difficult. • Population served by the road. We will select local roads that serve the most residences. Listed below are roads that met these criteria: Road From To Alamo Ave. Barrenda Ave. Rosario Ave. Arena Ave. San Anselmo Ave. Yerba Ave. Castano Ave. Curbaril Ave. Palomar Ave. Cortez Ave. Curbaril Ave. End Estrada Ave. San Anselmo Ave. San Jacinto Ave. Dolores Ave. Traffic Way San Jacinto Ave. Mountain View Dr. Portola Road. Santa Rosa Rd. San Diego Rd. Atascadero Ave US 101 San Rafael Rd. West Front Street Atascadero Ave San Vicente Ave. San Jacinto Ave. End Serra Ave. Atascadero Ave San Andres Ave. Violeta Ave. Santa Lucia Rd. A uilla Ave. Yesal Ave. Curbaril Ave. Castano Ave. Yerba Ave. Dolores Ave. Estrada Ave. ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 02/11/2003 Staff is recommending that the following roads be worked on this year: • Road From To Castano Ave. Curbaril Ave. Palomar Ave. San Vicente Ave. San Jacinto Ave. End Serra Ave. Atascadero Ave San Andres Ave. Yesal Ave. Curbaril Ave. Castano Ave. Assessment Districts Assessment Districts are a tool that can be used to fund improvements for the roads through an assessment on the property tax bill. This assessment is approved by a vote of the parties affected. This tool could be used by neighborhoods to fund paving dirt roads, reconstruction of old roads, the building drainage systems to keep storm water off roads and to provide preventive maintenance on roads as they age. Council directed staff to assist neighborhoods in creating Assessment Districts (See Attachment "D" for the Assessment District Formation Procedures). The procedure is broken down into two processes, the informal process and the formal process. The informal process is: An interested property owner meets with Public Works Department to discuss the • improvements needed and start laying out the assessment district boundaries. Public Works Department visits the site with the neighborhood to answer questions and delivers a preliminary cost estimate of the improvements. The interested property owner draws up an informal petition, has it signed by 60% or more of the affected property owners and presents it to the City Engineer. The City Engineer presents the informal petition to the City Council, and asks that he be directed to complete an Assessment District Preliminary Study, as follows: • Draw up the tentative boundaries of an Assessment District, • Assess the condition of the existing street, • Prepare a preliminary cost estimate for construction of the improvements necessary to repair existing deficiencies and bring the street into substantial conformance with City standards, • Prepare a preliminary cost estimate for continued maintenance of the road, • Estimate the costs of establishing the assessment districts (hiring an Assessment Engineer, hiring Bond Counsel, bond issuance costs, etc.) above and beyond the actual construction costs, • Estimate the amortized yearly cost to each property owner based on an assumed interest rate and amortization period, • Schedule a community meeting with the property owners and present the information and approximate costs. - 1Zyl ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 02/11/2003 • The formal process would occur if, after the community meeting with the property owners, the City Engineer feels sufficient substantial and serious commitment from the property owners to continue. A detailed description of the formal process is described in Attachment"D." The first public information meeting on Assessment Districts was held on March 25, 2002 in the City Council Chambers. More than 120 residents attended the meeting. In the meeting staff explained the Assessment District process, the assistance staff will offer, and the up-front funding available for the design of the improvements, the Engineer's Report and Bond Counsel. Staff took sign-ups of residents interested in having a neighborhood meeting to learn more about the process for an individual neighborhood. Staff had many contacts with interested parties and held many neighborhood meetings and walks. Ads were run in the Atascadero News in January 2003 to encourage residences to participate in the Assessment District process. Informal petitions were returned, signed by more than 60% of the residences, on the following roads: Aurora, Cortina, unpaved portion of Mananita, Ortega, Encinal, Azucena, El Descanso and a portion of Pinal at the end of Cortina. Staff is still working with residents on El Monte Road; Seperado, Valentina, Cayucos, Rosita, and San Francisco Avenues; La Uva Lane and Otero Road on the formation of Assessment Districts. The approximate total cost for the construction of improvements on the roads that have petitions submitted is $650,000.00. Because of the costs of issuance associated with bond financing, a minimum borrowing of $1,000,000 is recommended. The $650,000.00 is short of the $1,000,000.00 goal. Based on the above information, staff recommends the following: ❖ On streets that have submitted petitions, Staff should proceed with the Assessment District preliminary study, as follows: • Draw up the tentative boundaries of an Assessment District, • Assess the condition of the existing street, • Prepare a preliminary cost estimate for construction of the improvements necessary to repair existing deficiencies and bring the street into substantial conformance with City standards, • Prepare a preliminary cost estimate for continued maintenance of the road, • Estimate the costs of establishing the assessment districts (hiring an Assessment Engineer, hiring Bond Counsel, bond issuance costs, etc.) above and beyond the actual construction costs, • Estimate the amortized yearly cost to each property owner based on an assumed interest rate and amortization period, • • Schedule a community meeting with the property owners and present the information and approximate costs. ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 02/11/2003 ❖ On streets that have not submitted petitions, Staff should continue to work with interested neighborhoods. When petitions with 60% of the residence signatures are • received on a road, staff will move into the above-listed process on that road. ❖ When petitions representing $1,000,000.00 worth of road construction costs have been submitted and the Assessment District Preliminary Study has been completed, staff will look for Council to direct staff to begin the formal process and the Engineer's Report. The future maintenance issue continues to come up in neighborhood discussions and it is likely that these groups will present their concerns to Council. All the petitions submitted are on roads that are non-city-maintained. In the past, the City has accepted roads that were improved to City standards. However, in the last several years the City has maintained a policy of only accepting roads designated in the General Plan Circulation Element as arterials/collectors. Because the City's current road responsibility is so vast and resources limited, no additional local or neighborhood roads have been accepted. Council confirmed this policy at an earlier Atascadero Road Program meeting on Assessment Districts. Simply stated, because the City does not have sufficient revenue to meet the current maintenance demands, a policy was adopted to not accept additional roads. However, residents argue that this makes an unfair standard when compared to city-maintained roads. Staff explained that staff did not have the resources to add more roads to the maintenance backlog. There are three alternatives to this issue: 1. Maintain the current policy, not accepting the roads for maintenance and requiring that a second assessment district be passed to take care of future maintenance. The City would receive the funds and be responsible to complete the maintenance. The cost to the property owners would not be very high since little maintenance would be required for the first six years and maintenance, when done on a regular basis, is not expensive. 2. Accept the road for maintenance once the improvements are complete. The maintenance on these roads may not meet the expectations of the residents nor the required amount to keep the road in good shape, based on current staff levels and funding. 3. Do not accept the roads for maintenance and do not require that a second Assessment District be passed to take care of future maintenance. The roads would not be maintained once the improvements are complete, unless the owner provided the maintenance in the future. FISCAL IMPACT: The cost to perform maintenance work on local roads is approximately $40,000.00. These funds will come from Public Works Street Maintenance Operating Supplies and Contract Services accounts. The 2001-2003 City Budget et has $50,000.00 budgeted to assist residents in the creation of • Assessment Districts. ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 02/11/2003 ALTERNATIVES: 1. Local Road Paving. Council could direct staff to work on a specific road. 2. Assessment Districts. See alternatives listed in the staff report. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A—Atascadero Road Program Map Attachment B—List of Circulation Plan Roads Attachment C—Local Road Lists Attachment D—Assessment District Formation Procedures • 18 4 � M�IMYNMIM�i�Mii i r J� i LEGEND �I t COMPLETED REHABILITATION PROJECT PROGRAMMED REHABILITATION PROJECT SUMMER 2003 PAVING PROJECT T � PROGRAMMED REHAB. - DESIGN COMPLETED �t r� MAINTENANCE DISTRICT PROJECT In, _. CIRCULATION PLAN ROADS ~` m0° CITY MAINTAINED ROADS NON-CITY MAINTAINED ROADS UNBUILT ROADS STATE HIGHWAY CITY LIMITS COLONY BOUNDARY .o M W E E Z gym; m o c c o m d ma Sy. O N a` d- I I I I I I ICLI co V tO In to Q)l� O� M N(00 N �N H�MfO�tNfl �(O IA NNOO�OMI'7 �oNINA"fNN V V tO t1 M CO '70 fA E911di N M �� yg H� W m m m M CD0 =T=T=T wT=T=T tT m>O.tTmm>O.wTm=Tmai wTmwTm =Tm=TmTm >c`t>`=>`Tro �fTmTro��oz>`vo�"TmTro c1 �� N > > > > o ` -- `0000000rnov5000000 �oo0V50 �0000zoo �oT oT�N, oymtiit�TRocTm1 � >o� �N, ztNn m .. cccccccyc ycc cc ooc�.=_� OalS� cccc » c =_ > > yccmvv �� a) � �NiL- HHHFL- 1�5F= F=-Fc- Fc-FLILHMIL-FHHF Mf"F"M1t-FLHF FLHMHHHFL-Nt�ILHMMHFLFL-H �Mr7� LL LL LL LL LL LL p^cNt�PI2�� O)OOI- I--- cOtOInIn vvvvvM mMMMMMf'7MNNNNNNNNNNcV NNNNNNNNNNNN a`— U V MMM M M M V) m -CM M M M M M N M V V V() N M Cr)N•t'T V) )'q— M N M M M @7 N N CM M N N V) T T V)Cq N a c o sss(CL OCL sss $ (CL g Ct g g � S sssI--CD s O Q W P N�t�t0nv v-V w v'w MM 'TMNNNN MNNM NNrU) .-N rr�,NNr• rNNv r .--er (V of C OO dMfhM 04 N NrO�'VNIA•���0 � 'V�of'7p1N� MN O MC rC N- MM �Nc I'- .(D NVmW) aO� �00-- - J E O O O O O O CO- O-O C 0 0 0 0 0 6 0. O C C C G O G fVCC G O•O LAO G C C c .C� GC C ca 0 C O O > rV > C V m > 4) C E•O C C Q d Q E E Q U Of o E c o o m m o CL d — T rno c �, roomy c 0 ovo oItLLa' c �^ o Em E —m m oa=�— °- o c o d �ivU—m c v v� m— o c N NU m 'Y Ua o c 0.. .. E c o E 0 4) S. o o_ T c 8 — p 0 m tB cNdc " c� roacco mcc pcmia� m cmi $ o� m� mro Ema'S o0a+�roU 1rfolpcI' cd6 U) 0 c ro w y� ma O o w mU 0 N C tax CU �� m m m py t C>W� sp a mU Ey o a'> VJ 7 p O. p m t O ro;.0.. ro o ro O ro O o o U O • fn y Q c o -) m v �Q IL mfg E= o E 0 0.2 c o o ro o a 0 co � ¢00 t� , acov �Qy� wRQ�Q cnU mo mdSmodo � ro ma $ m O 83~ ro ES o d w 01 row al 02 ;52-62-222 > > o LLa E° oU E'° m o'o La > c '$-2 L o o¢ o m 0 0: "0 �°c Q Q Y o lag N icy cn c 0v E �mm oN E E m 0"00: cv Q roo T m �0 0 0 yi—y c mo tL~ coo c E NEW o � '� ° E 0 B `� No 0 oFo d0 o ro o ro m 00 o y ).c om ro oa o o °'� '�C� E l0 C C O N C 0 0 O m o d 0)U C ro O T 't o 0 y m w a E T n c T ro o c U O -� vUl�oaaccEvmccsE� oEdaR-' yom�amro v0 ro oQmrocy °-) E• '�° °' co o c 0 o Q ' md � ¢ m rooc� mLLo o�o "c� mmro•- � c� c� yC7C9o:9:° � o— ro pU:: E o y vroiy o c UE c c UtyUc2ic cccc00)yro > cc cc c ro ro ro mm¢ U c c c — —U c 0 o m m -- ro ro o„— ro 0 o m o �° ro m m m ro._ �° ro row m ro m m o— cu F-2� ay¢ Mv�CnUwOrn� cn� w ¢wcn2arnpF-cncnv�cnC7x ¢¢t7�nnO (nxz�wv) v> v coawu� Q d d c i l0 l0 16 l0 l0 l0 10 l0 > N d d Na� dmdd ddd off° Q 0d Qo d > > 0 — wwItww wIrw ro ov— v _ o oQ oQ w 0s 00000 000 mmm — mBOrm `2icroi � Eaci800 N 0 •VO6 0 E20Eoc � 'C ccc cc cc c �i �>im1II �xmoatr ' a �i >� avm nxi` c� m.g yvgi 8y d10cm UUUUU �0 �UUUm �° 0 �ood0om mmmmIcvdo dto ccoEom `m m mdmdro:° mr- mock m cU c •�c— c c c coc - F- ��1-acncocncncococn-iacnQ>cnUcna�w(9mCOW cnycnpcnQcncoQcnwCDQ • V%69,OOOMI_pup 00 40%0_ V�- ON��(00_�O pCppL CL 9N SEA 69690000 ��'�t000 '�t0 V 000�_ NOM�69 K M NM bn4 (h 8Di �to 0�N .91� f V►E9 ff99 u4 69 �VP V► � 69 V�64 iA ttttttAAAAAA co N 4! mm m m m mm m mm m m m m m W �N — —to m miimNmii 3m� ii �iai „_�(ninmmtn �tmn �_�to�n (?onm— wm WL � � OZZ co U) aZ-- 000 -- r 000 -- 00 00 W oo_ (�in in N in c (n (A Y (n to (A to in Y tQ N Y m m►c 0 0 0 `! y :3.9 7 7 _7 y 7 y 7 y U OU 7 d d 4) C U C 0) 0)>> d d d C U_C d >>C C C U L- N C N a 7 7 (n LL.. to 7 M 7 01 to 7 7 to 7 � L� > >ow 7 O 7 =Z= 7 7tn(A==6=z N y69696? LL LL LL LL LL LL.LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL NN 04 -.- - - - -- --1- --7 W J R W z a yJg }o �� NMNNN� N� N�LnN� .- NSM VM r-.-NN.- .-.- M'7M ��NNMMNM� Cn z in g g $ g$ g$$gg � 8g $ �BppS� g$ Sg gg g $gLgiL�iL�i O -�w> O � OOOMOCCLCC 'et L_N (O (O Ln 00 cc `7 t'-:.00 (�00 .-000th ht.LA Cl) ��Ln Lf1NNN� Q U) W 0Yz �V'V�N.-�� Cl) ('0—M ANN— NNe- r- �� �.- F- W JZUp In Hyl- f'W y 00 VONhOIN hLA (O'7 LA(OOM Mh 0h 00 t000� 20 Ohto Ohhp`7hh W MN Q O (O (O �N�O � '�t . (0.7 00(0 LA N (h'-': .LA �V'h N O 7 LA N ��.-t�'I (O N LQ "E; W LL 0 J R 0 >,o F- 41 V `° m LTc c o O E O to N y y o N m j 00 a m o (O G N C O O C y R J N p (O`1 O E 0� N w �—R' > y C m m Z A � � LY V Q H O Lip m o m (n f� o U m R >'—J o •° y LL m to n U U U Rt cooLYC � L° r� � y (nUEQ $o d0.�>Q , Ea 0co ='oo () V V V � N m m O o C M 0 0 0 M a) m OC 2 U �w0 lC� U—O M 'O iq �= O o�7 � a a o �w � � 0 0 — t—ICL Lma�y=m — 5,c IN �m oO > am m o g 0 mt�.N�L c c m m o$ o $ m $ d c � w o d d� w d $ $ wa c 'U C yZ,� >'� tr � Uc��vU —y� � mw atYtYwoor �� gmo �og� scuo U= cam :: G � oM:: ( — o (0U) o2oo vmo' m o SS — E > — oc $ o_ o c .9my 'T to 0'a M0`� � c8 :-,w02 wo > >, 0 n a—Ni �ti� m o � � m o�°� �� m mM 0 0 o2 ou 0 Q 2 $ c o d��t me w C go � moL� oEmU0�omoUUO� � � � mU.�m:° o:° mVoommoodm > O awUtn= U2OtnwdaCL(n0ww� wQ= tnw>tnama (nw- UMaaOm (9i (9i QV > > Z _ >C C C4 to rN Y m > C y y y o u l�0 (•06 y �p O•NC O U ` E O O O O O N O LY d m m (_S O0 0 — O C 7 8 (� y c C UU }} off}R � � �� miomw} - v2J =� rnccavm cym "! � � in mm 0mmm0) € 0'16 V5 mom °' m � m (aa (ca � o � mam" � � mmoo (`o € m�� `m O •tntnu�2(natn � U� (na(n3.(nUwUcoUJc7(nx(naaa0(n(OM200t-(naa0 z ( 8 Maintained Local Roads •Street Segment Length Alamo Dolores to Honda 0.55 Alcantara Marchant to Marchant 0.22 Alegre Atascadero Road to end 0.08 Alturas Balboa to Del Rio 1.04 Amar on Falda to San Anselmo 0.32 Andrita Sierra Vista to Casanova 0.10 Arcade El Camino Real to EI Corte 0.35 Ardilla Monterey to south of Balboa 0.70 Ardilla Atascadero Mall to San Anselmo 1.01 Arena San Benito to Yerba 0.65 Arizona Estrada to San Jacinto 0.37 Arroyo Gancho to Rosario 0.19 Ash Street EI Camino Real to Catalpa 0.08 Bajada Traffic Way to Dulzura 0.33 Balboa Graves Creek to San Fernando 1.33 Barranco Carmelita to end 0.58 Barranco Heights Barranco to Lucinda Lane 0.11 Barrenda Alamo to Traffic Way 0.42 Bella Vista San Marcos to end 0.74 Birch Catalpa to end 0.05 Buena Miramon to end 0.16 Cabrillo Ensenada to Capistrano 0.32 Capistrano West Mall to Santa Ysabel 0.32 Carmelita San Andres to Curbaril 0.46 Carrizo Traffic Way to EI Camino Real 0.56 Casanova Andrita to Carmelita 0.60 Cascabel Santa Lucia to Ardilla 0.69 Cascada EI Centro to El Camino Real 0.09 Castano Maleza to Palomar 0.55 Castenada Lane Toloso to end 0.20 Catalpa San Rafael to end 0.23 Cebada Santa Ana to end 0.30 Cemetery Capistrano to Mercedes 0.15 Cenegal Laurel to end 1.08 Chandler Lane San Rafael to end 0.10 Chico Traffic Way to Del Rio 0.20 Colima San Benito to San Anselmo 0.61 Colorado San Rafael to San Diego 0.50 Conejo Ramona to end 0.15 Coromar Marchant to Portola 0.72 Corona Santa Ana to end 0.76 Corriente San Fernando to end 0.76 Corriente Llano to end 0.14 Cortez Maleza to end 0.49 Country Club Capistrano to Mercedes 0.13 Cristobal San Andres to Curbaril 0.41 Cuesta Court San Rafael to end 0.13 Del Rio San Gregorio to San Gre odo 1.70 • d • Devon Court Santa Ynez to end 0.05 Dolores San Anselmo to Traffic Way 0.96 Dulzura Gancho to Fresno 0.59 East Front San Gabriel to Santa Rosa 0.38 East Mall EI Camino Real to Lewis 0.15 EI Centro Arcade to Cascada 0.07 El Corte Arcade to La Linea 0.29 EI Dorado Arcade to La Linea 0.24 EI Monte Santa Lucia to City Limits 0.76 EI Verano Dolores to Vida 0.51 Enchanto Balboa to end 0.49 Ensenada Capistrano to Capistrano 0.42 Entrada Lewis to EI Camino Real 0.15 Escalon Miramon to Hildago 0.08 Estrada San Ansemo to San Jacinto 0.37 Falda San Benito to Amargon 0.30 Flores Santa Lucia to Los Gatos 0.21 Fresno San Jacinto to Rosario 0.34 Gabarda Curbaril to Wastewater Plant 0.44 Gancho Dolores to Rosario 0.46 Garcero Santa Ana to end 0.45 Garcia Santa Cruz to east end 0.61 Graves Creek San Fernando to Santa Ana 0.38 Hermosa Navarette to San Clemente 0.19 • Hermosilla Cayucos to San Jacinto 0.30 Hildago Sycamore to Sycamore 0.35 Honda Traffic Way to Bajada 0.30 Juni ero EI Camino Real to end 0.68 La Canada Del Rio to end 0.28 La Linea EI Corte to State Route 101 0.46 La Luz San Benito to Arena 0.46 La Paz Atascadero Road to end 0.27 Lake View Portola to Santa Rosa 0.47 Las Lomas EI Bordo to end 0.45 Laurel Santa Lucia to end 0.43 Lewis Traffic to East Mall 0.38 Lia Arena to Amar on 0.18 Llano Santa Lucia west to Balboa 1.61 Lomitas Santa Lucia to end 0.99 Los Gatos Santa Lucia to end 0.48 Los Osos San Rafael to Old Morro Road East 1.14 Lucinda Lane Entire length 0.35 Ma delena Cemetery to Mercedes 0.22 Magnolia Capistrano to Mercedes 0.27 Maleza Castano to Cortez 0.08 Maple EI Camino Real to Catalpa 0.08 Marchant Morro Road to Portola 1.37 Marchant Way Pismo to Santa Rosa 0.33 • Maricopa San Anselmo to end 0.54 Mari uita IlRosario to Olmeda 0.26 Miramon ISycamore to Sycamore 0.48 Monita San Gabriel to Sierra Vista 0.19 • Montecito Las Lomas to East Front 0.16 Monterey Court Monterey to end 0.09 Mountain View Portola to Santa Rosa 0.46 Musselman EI Camino Real to end 0.27 Nacimiento Atascadero Mall to end 0.11 Nava'oa Santa Ynez to Curbaril 0.79 Navarette San Marcos to Santa Lucia 0.59 Navidad EI Verano to Vida 0.21 Nogales Dolores to Dulzura 0.78 Obispo Traffic Way to Del Rio 0.63 Old Morro Road Morro Road to Morro Road 1.64 Old Morro Road East Morro Road to Morro Road 0.43 Olmeda San Jacinto to West Mall 0.76 Palma San Jacinto To East Mall 0.81 Palomar Yesal to EI Camino Real 0.97 Paseo Pacifico Santa Cruz to end 0.13 Pinewood Court Catalpa to end 0.05 Pino Solo La Linea to Principal 0.33 Plata Lane EI Camino Real to end 0.09 Potrero Traffic Way to Del Rio 0.34 Prado Court San Rafael to end 0.09 Principal EI Camino Real to Las Lomas 0.15 Pueblo Sombrilla to San Luis Avenue 0.34 Ramona Del Rio to Monterey 1.17 • Rayar Lomitas to Nudoso 0.06 Ridgeway Court Rosario to end 0.04 Robles Santa Ysabel to Sombrilla 0.09 San Andres Atascadero Avenue to Marchant 0.27 San Ardo Arena to Dolores 0.23 San Clemente San Marcos to San Marcos 0.44 San Diego Road Atascadero Road to State Route 101 0.59 San Diego Road San Dimas to City Limits 0.52 San Diego Way EI Camino Real to State Route 101 0.24 San Dimas Lane Los Osos to end 0.10 San Dimas Road Los Osos to San Diego Road 0.66 San Gregorio Garcia to Santa Ana 2.37 San Guillermo San Gabriel to end 0.17 San Lucas EI Monte to end 0.21 San Luis Avenue Pueblo to Curbaril 0.23 San Palo San Anselmo to Ardilla 0.47 San Pedro Gancho to Alamo 0.19 San Rafael EI Camino Real to State Route 101 0.12 San Rafael Atascadero Road to West Front 0.51 San Rafael San Gabriel to Los Osos 0.46 San Ramon Del Rio to Caltrans right of way 0.28 San Vincente Dolores to San Jacinto 0.31 Santa Ana Santa Cruz to Lot 10 0.30 Santa Ana Santa Lucia to Balboa 2.46 Santa Fe EI Corte to EI Dorado 0.12 • Santa Ynez Morro Road to Morro Road 1.14 i i U, • Serra Atascadero Avenue to San Andres 0.17 Sierra Vista Monita to San Marcos 0.31 Sinaloa Curbaril to Pueblo 0.24 Solano EI Camino Real to La Linea 0.15 Sombrilla Curbaril to end 0.64 Sycamore Capistrano to Miramon 0.85 Tampico Gabarda to end 0.33 Tecolote Llano to gate 0.08 Toloso San Dimas to City Limits 0.44 Tunitas Bajada to Traffic Way 0.36 Valle Palomar to end 1.15 Venado Santa Lucia to Ardilla 0.78 Via Traffic Way to Ensenada 0.13 Vida Nogales to San Jacinto 0.64 Violeta Santa Lucia to Aguila 0.30 Vista San Marcos to Ibsen Tract 0.28 West Front Portola to State Route 101 0.96 Willow EI Camino Real to end 0.02 Yerba Estrada to Dolores 0.29 Yesal Curbaril to Castano 0.21 TOTAL 76.31 • Non-City Maintained Roads • Length Street Segment (miles) Aguila Venado to Venado 0.85 Alondra Santa Barbara to end 0.23 Alta Vista Navarette to Navarette 0.38 Amapoa Curbaril to Portola 0.40 Aragon Tampico to end 0.05 Ardilla Portola west to end 0.14 Ardilla Graves Creek to end 0.11 Ardilla Balboa to end 0.38 Artiga Balboa to end 0.05 Atajo Chauplin to end 0.05 Atascadero Mall EI Camino Real to State Route 101 0.04 Atascadero Road Santa Barbara to end 0.09 Aurora Tampico to end 0.05 Avenal Pismo to Santa Rosa 0.05 Azucena Curbaril to Portola 0.42 Balboa Otereo to Llano 0.47 Bolsa Santa Lucia to end 0.28 Calle Cynthia EI Camino Real to end 0.09 Calle Refugio Via Tortuga to end 0.07 Campbell Lane EI Camino Real to end 0.11 Campo Monterey to end 0.14 Casitas Sierra Vista to end 0.24 Cayucos San Anselmo to Lobos 0.33 Cemetary Mercedes to end 0.28 Chauplin Venado to Santa Lucia 0.57 Cholare Mono Road to end 0.14 Chorro Santa Lucia to end 0.38 Circle Oak San Rafael to end 0.14 Cole Court Portola to end 0.09 Constancia Marchant to end 0.05 Corta Santa Lucia to end 0.04 Cortez North end 0.05 Cortina Pinal to Valle 0.19 Cristobal Curbaril east to end 0.21 Curvado Circle Dolores to Dolores 0.14 Eagle Creek Court Santa Barbara to end 0.14 EI Centro Cascada to end 0.14 EI Descanso Larga to end (2 sections) 0.09 EI Parque Pismo to Santa Rosa 0.09 EI Retiro San Andres to end 0.11 Encinal Valle to end 0.28 Encino Santa Lucia to end 0.42 Escarpa Pinal to Valle 0.19 Escondido Portal to end 0.47 Falda Amargon to San Anselmo 0.30 Gallina Llano to end 0.11 Gusta EI Camino Real to end 0.09 Hermosilla Cayucos to Lobos 0.09 • Hospital Drive Capistrano to Capistrano 0.22 Jaquima Corona to end 0.09 Jolon Barrano to end 0.11 Jornada Lane EI Camino Real to end 0.19 Juanita Sombrilla to end 0.09 Juarez Barrenda to end 0.09 La Costa EI Camino Real to end 0.11 La Uva EI Camino Real to end 0.05 Larga Navarette to San Clemente 0.38 Las Casitas EI Camino Real to Los Pueblos 0.24 Linda Vista Navarette to end 0.11 Lobos San Anselmo to Nogales 0.43 Lobos Court Lobos Lane to end 0.05 Lobos Lane Nogales to end 0.19 Los Cerritos San Andres to Navarette 0.09 Los Pueblos Las Casitas to Las Casitas 0.28 Madera Place EI Camino Real to end 0.09 Maleza Castano to Pinal 0.28 Mananita Dolores to Estrada 0.24 Marco Lane EI Camino Real to end 0.15 Maya Lane EI Camino Real to end 0.15 Mira Flores San Andres to end 0.11 Montura Lane Coromar to end 0.05 Nudoso Rayar to Lomitas 0.57 • Ortega Atascadero Road south to City Limits 0.52 Otero Balboa to end 0.38 Pajaro Coromar to end 0.19 Palo Verde Old Morro Road to Lot 19 0.76 Pequina Larga to Larga 0.19 Pescado Venado to end 0.13 Piedras Altos Curbaril to Portola 0.38 Pinal Curbaril to end 0.66 Portal San Marcos to end 1.04 Portola Way Portola to end 0.09 Ramage Portola to end 0.09 Realito Vista to end 0.38 Rio Rita Del Rio to end 0.24 Rivera Bonica to Maduro 0.14 Ropa Court San Gregorio to end 0.38 Rosita Avenue San Anselmo to Nogales 0.38 Rosita Court San Anselmo to end 0.09 San Benito EI Camino Real to State Route 101 0.09 San Carlos San Rafael to City Limits 0.14 San Cayetano Cenegal to end 0.38 San Fernando Monterey to Balboa 0.85 San Francisco Marchant to Azucena 0.19 San Gabriel San Marcos to Santa Lucia 1.04 San Marcos Sierra Vista to Portal 0.85 San Marcos Los Altos westerly to end 0.71 San Rafael Los Osos to easterly end 0.19 Santa Barbara Atascadero Road to Atascadero Road 0.13 X93 Santa Cruz Ramona to Graves Creek 0.09 , Santa Cruz EI Camino Real to Traffic Way 0.47 Santa Cruz Garcia to Graves Creek 0.28 Sausalito Balboa to end 0.14 Seperado San Jacinto to San Anselmo (2 sections) 0.38 Serena Mercedes to end 0.38 Sierra Vista Monita easterly 0.19 Silla Colima to end 0.23 Sonora Pinal to Valle 0.28 Tecorida San Andres north to end 0.19 Tecorida Curbaril to end 0.05 Tecorida Marchant to end 0.05 Tecorida San Andres south to end 0.14 Tranquilla San Anselmo to Rosita 0.24 Vega Ardilla to end (2 sections) 0.28 Vernalis Tampico to end 0.19 Via Tortuga Atascadero Road to Coromar 0.25 Viscano Dolores to end 0.24 Vista Ibsen Tract 0.47 TOTAL 29.43 • X94 • Assessment District Formation Procedures The Public Works Department is taking the lead in helping neighborhood in the formation of Assessment Districts. Assessment districts are a way for neighborhoods to fund the improve of their roads and provide for long term maintenance. Public Works will assist in neighborhood coordination, district boundary determination, petition creation, initial construction cost estimates, design of improvements and district engineers report. Due to the long-term cost and commitment the property owners must make, the City seeks the assurance that 60% or more of the property owners, proposed to be in the district, are willing to participate before formal assessment district proceedings. • The informal process is as follows: 1. An interested property owner meets with Public Works Department to discuss the improvements needed and start laying out the assessment district boundaries. 2. Public Works Department visits the site with the neighborhood to answer questions and deliver a preliminary cost estimate of the improvements. 3. An interested property owner draws up an informal petition, has it signed by 60% or more of the affected property owners and presents it to the City Engineer. 4. The City Engineer presents the informal petition to the City Council, and asks that he be directed to: a. draw up the tentative boundaries of an Assessment District b. assess the condition of the existing street c. prepare a preliminary cost estimate for construction of the improvements necessary to repair existing deficiencies and bring the street into substantial conformance with City standards. is d. prepare a preliminary cost estimate for continued maintenance of the road. s e. estimate the costs of establishing the assessment districts (hiring an Assessment Engineer, hiring Bond Counsel, bond issuance costs, etc.) above and beyond the actual construction costs. f. estimate the amortized yearly cost to each property owner based on an assumed interest rate and amortization period. g. schedule a community meeting with the property owners and present the information and approximate costs. The following steps would occur if, after the community meeting with the property owners, the City Engineer feels sufficient substantial and serious commitment from the property owners to continue. The formal process is as follows: 1. A formal petition in conformance with the Municipal Bond Act is circulated. The petition is signed by the requisite number of landowners and filed with the City Clerk. An engineer then certifies that the petition meets legal requirements and files a certificate with the City Clerk. 2. City Council adopts a Resolution Determining to Proceed. 3. City Council adopts a Resolution g g Appointing Engineer and Bond Counsel to handle the • P proceedings. 4. City Council adopts a Resolution of Intention to Acquire and Construct Improvements. Note at this point the proceedings usually stop for a period of a few weeks to several months while the Engineer prepares the Engineer's Report as directed in the Resolution of Intention. The Engineer's Report can be submitted based on either schematic or detailed plans and specifications, depending on the desires of the City. 5. Engineer's Report is prepared and consists of: a. detailed or schematic plans and specifications of the improvements to be constructed. b. maps and descriptions of lands, easements, and property necessary to be acquired. c. an itemized Engineer's estimate of the cost of acquisitions and improvements. d. a diagram of the assessment district showing each lot or parcel of land within the assessment district. • • e. an assessment roll showing the actual assessments against the properties benefited. f. a proposed maximum annual assessment to reimburse the City for registration and administration of expenses. 6. The Engineer's Report is then filed with the City Clerk and presented to the City Council for approval. 7. City Council adopts a Resolution of Preliminary Approval of the Engineer's Report. 8. City Council adopts a Resolution Appointing Time and Place of two public hearings on Engineer's Report. 9. City Council adopts a Resolution Describing Boundaries of Assessment District. 10. City Council adopts a Resolution Establishing Prevailing Wage Rates and Calling for Sealed Proposals (if appropriate at this juncture). Note at this point the proceedings stop for at least 45 days(typically 60 to 75 days)for various notices to be given advising property owners of the two public hearings and their associated rights. • 11. The first public hearing is conducted for information purposes only. Y 12. In compliance is Proposition 218, the second public hearing is noticed in writing 45 days in advance of the hearing. The official notice includes: a. total assessment for entire assessment district; b. assessment chargeable on owner's parcel; C. duration of proposed assessment; d. reason for assessment e. basis on which amount of proposed assessment was calculated; f. date, time and place of public hearing; g. summary of voting procedures and effect of majority protest. 13. The second public hearing is opened and a staff report is made which consists of: • a. an explanation by Bond Counsel of the purpose of the hearing. b. a report by the City Clerk that the necessary affidavits of notice are on file an that • said notices were given within the statutory time limits provided. C. a report by the City Clerk on the written protests filed by property owners prior to the second public hearing and the percentage of protest. 14. The mayor opens the hearing for oral protests or endorsements, and after everyone is heard the public hearing is closed and the matter is subject to City Council deliberation. 15. After deliberation, the following actions are considered: a. If majority protest is filed, the Assessment District fails and this agenda item is closed. b. Resolution Overruling Protests is adopted C. Resolution Approving the Engineer's Report, Ordering the Acquisitions, and Confirming the Assessment is adopted d. Resolution Awarding Construction Contract for the improvements is adopted 16. The improvements are completed. • In addition to the above, there are numerous steps related to issuance of bonds, payment of bond proceeds, disposition of surplus bond proceeds, etc. which also occur concurrent with or soon after construction of the improvements. As can be seen, the assessment district process is lengthy and potentially costly to the City. Therefore the City has instituted the informal petition process to "test the waters" before formal assessment district proceedings are undertaken. To assist you with this process, we are enclosing a draft copy of an informal petition. If you have any questions regarding the above, please do not hesitate to contact us. • • Mr. Steven Kahn Director of Public Works 6500 Palma Avenue Atascadero, CA 93422 Dear Mr. Kahn, We, the undersigned residents of , hereby petition the City of Atascadero to begin the necessary proceedings to create assessment districts for the repair and continued maintenance of Cortina Ave. Please accept this petition as the necessary first step in initiating the process to: draw up the tentative boundaries of an assessment district; assess the condition of the existing street; prepare a preliminary cost estimate for construction of the improvements necessary to repair existing deficiencies and bring the street into substantial conformance with City standards; estimate the costs of establishing an assessment district (hiring a Assessment Engineer, hiring Bond Counsel, bond issuance costs, etc.) above and beyond the actual construction costs; estimate the amortized monthly cost to each property owner based on an assumed interest rate and amortization period; schedule a community meeting with the property owners and present the information and approximate costs. We understand that this petition is not binding in any way. We further understand that a formal petition conforming to the requirements of the Municipal Bond Act is required to begin assessment district formation proceedings. By signing this petition, we do not waive our right under the Municipal Bond Act to protest the formation of an assessment district. • • Name, address, phone number Signature leaseprint) •