HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 11/12/2002 CITY OF ATASCADERO
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
TUESDAY, November '12, 2002
7:00 P.M.
City of Atascadero
6500 Palma Avenue, 4th Floor
Atascadero, California
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: 6:30 P.M.
REGULAR SESSION: 7:00 P.M.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Council Member Clay
ROLL CALL: Mayor Arrambide
Mayor Pro Tem Scalise
Council Member Clay
Council Member Johnson
Council Member Luna
INTRODUCTIONS:
APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Roll Call
PRESENTATIONS:
1. Recognition Plaque — Peter Kincade, resigning Little League President
2. Presentation by Andrew Fruin, Information Technology Director, to
Melanie Whaley, Technical Assistant 11, for Microsoft certification
COMMUNITY FORUM: (This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wanting to address the
Council on any matter not on this agenda and over which the Council has jurisdiction. Speakers are
limited to five minutes. Please state your name and address for the record before making your
presentation. The Council may take action to direct the staff to place a matter of business on a future
agenda. A maximum of 30 minutes will be allowed for Community Forum, unless changed by the
Council.)
COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS: (On their own initiative, Council Members
may make a brief announcement or a brief report on their own activities. Council Members may ask a
question for clarification, make a referral to staff or take action to have staff place a matter of business on
a future agenda. The Council may take action on items listed on the Agenda.)
A. CONSENT CALENDAR: (All items on the consent calendar are considered to be routine
and non-controversial by City staff and will be approved by one motion if no member of the Council or
public wishes to comment or ask questions. If comment or discussion is desired by anyone, the item will
be removed from the consent calendar and will be considered in the listed sequence with an opportunity
for any member of the public to address the Council concerning the item before action is taken.)
1. City Council Minutes — October 22, 2002
■ City Clerk recommendation: City Council approve the City Council minutes of October 22,
2002 [City Clerk]
2. City Treasurer's Report—August and September 2002
■ Fiscal impact: None
■ City Treasurer recommendation: City Council approve the City Treasurer's report for August
and September 2002. [City Treasurer]
3. September Disbursements — September 2002 Accounts Payable & Payroll
■ Fiscal impact: $1,740,420.23
■ Staff recommendation: City Council approve certified City accounts payable, payroll and
payroll vendor checks for September 2002. [Administrative Services]
4. City Council Reimbursement
■ Fiscal impact: The $75.00 per month allowance would result in an annual expense of
$4,500.
■ Staff recommendation: Council adopt draft Resolution setting forth meeting and professional
development allowances for City Council Members. [City Manager]
2
5. Zone Change 2002-0028 — 1625, 1683, 1685 EI Camino Real (Kelly
Gearhart/Wilson Land Surveys)
■ Fiscal impact: Slight negative impact on City revenues — Single-family dwellings require
services that exceed the revenue generated by the dwelling.
• Staff recommendation: Council:
1. Adopt on second reading by title only,the draft Ordinance A for the creation of a new PD-
17 overlay district; and,
2. Adopt on second reading by title only the draft Ordinance B enacting Zone Change 2002-
0028 rezoning the project site to RSF-X / PD-17 subject to a Master Plan of
Development; and,
3. Review and approve the Master Plan of Development and Tentative Map condition
reserving certain units for sale to residents or people employed within the City of
Atascadero. [Community Development]
6. Final Tract Map 2001-0012 (Tract Map 2396) [TTM 2001-00011 - 6250 San
Gabriel Road (Rancho de Paraiso, LLC)
■ Fiscal impact:
■ Staff recommendation: Council
1. Accept Final Tract Map 2001-0012 (Tract Map 2396).
2. Reject without prejudice to future acceptance,the dedication of all streets and
easements delineated as offers of dedication for street purposes, public utility, slope,
drainage, and emergency access easements.
3. Authorize City Manager to execute Subdivision Improvement Agreement. [Public
Works]
. 7. Award of Contract for Downtown Streetscape Design Services
■ Fiscal impact: $6,500.00 for Amendment#2—funds included in the Project budget.
■ Staff recommendation: Council authorize the City Manager to execute amendment#2 to the
Consultant Services Agreement with RRM Design Group to produce the conceptual design
and construction documents for Downtown Streetscape. [Public Works]
B MANAGEMENT REPORTS:
1. Urgency Ordinance - Off Premises Auto Sales and Introduction of
Permanent Ordinance to Same Effect
■ Fiscal impact: None has been identified, but staff will examine the sales tax and other
revenues that may be produced by these events before the matter is returned to the City
Council.
■ Staff recommendation: City Council:
1. Adopt, by a 4/5 vote, draft Urgency Ordinance restricting off-premises sales of
automobiles.
2. Introduce for first reading, by title only, draft Ordinance forbidding off-site auto sales
events. [City Attorney]
2. Veterans' Preference in Hiring
■ Fiscal impact: None.
■ Staff recommendation: Council introduce for first reading by title only, the draft Ordinance
amending Section 2-2.07 of the Atascadero Municipal Code to provide for a veterans'
preference in hiring. [City Attorney]
3
C. COMMITTEE REPORTS: (The following represent standing committees. Informative status
reports will be given, as felt necessary.):
Mayor Arrambide
1. S.L.O. Council of Governments (SLOCOG)/S.L.O. Regional Transit Authority(SLORTA)
2. Water Committees
3. County Mayor's Round Table
Mayor Pro Tem Scalise
1. Finance Committee
2. City/Schools Committee
3. Atascadero State Hospital Advisory Board
4. Economic Vitality Corporation, Board of Directors (EVC)
Council Member Luna
1. Finance Committee
2. Integrated Waste Management Authority(IWMA)
3. North County Homeless Coalition
Council Member Johnson
1. Local Agency Formation Commissions (LAFCO)
2. Water Committees
Council Member Clay
1. Air Pollution Control District(APCD)
2. City/Schools Committee
D INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION:
1. City Council
2. City Clerk
3. City Treasurer
4. City Attorney
5. City Manager
E. ADJOURNMENT:
Please note: Should anyone challenge any proposed development entitlement listed on this Agenda in court, that
person may be limited to raising those issues addressed at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written
correspondence delivered to the City Council at or prior to this public hearing. Correspondence submitted at this
public hearing will be distributed to the Council and available for review in the City Clerk's office.
I, Marcia McClure Torgerson, the City Clerk of the City of Atascadero, declare under the penalty of
perjury that the foregoing agenda for the November 12, 2002 Regular Session of the Atascadero City
Council was posted on November 5, 2002 at Atascadero City Hall, 6500 Palma Ave., Atascadero, CA
93422 and was available for public review in the Customer Service Center at that location:
Signed this 5th day of November 2002 at Atascadero, California.
u L -tr l
Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk
City of Atascadero
4
ITEM NUMBER: A-1
DATE: 11/12/2002
,e,$ i 9 CITY OF A TASCA DERO
CITY COUNCIL
DRAFT MINUTES
TUESDAY, October 22, 2002
7:00 P.M.
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: 6:30 P.M.
REGULAR SESSION: 7:00 P.M.
Mayor Arrambide called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. and Mayor Pro Tem
Scalise led the Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL:
Present: Council Members Luna, Clay, Johnson, Scalise and Mayor
Arrambide
Absent: None
Others Present: City Clerk Marcia McClure Torgerson
Staff Present: City Manager Wade McKinney, Assistant City Manager Brady
Cherry, Community Development Director Warren Frace, Public
Works Director Steve Kahn, Deputy Community Services
Director Geoff English, Redevelopment Specialist John Jansons,
Police Chief Dennis Hegwood, Fire Chief Kurt Stone and City
Attorney Roy Hanley.
INTRODUCTIONS:
• Police Chief Dennis Hegwood introduced Police Officer Keith Falerios.
Officer
Falerios introduced his new partner, canine officer Zep Von Geishoff, and explained
CC 10/22/02
Page 1 - 0 01
ITEM NUMBER: A—1
DATE: 11/12/2002
the training program they have undergone to date and future training programs they
will be attending.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA:
Mayor Arrambide announced the De Anza Estates project has been dropped from
the agenda due to a noticing issue.
MOTION: By Council Member Luna and seconded by Council Member Clay
to approve the agenda as amended.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote.
PRESENTATIONS:
1. Endorsement of Prop. 46
■ Staff recommendation: Council approve the draft Resolution supporting The Housing
and Emergency Shelter Trust Fund Act of 2002 — Proposition 46 on the November 5,
2002 statewide ballot.
Dave Mullinax, League of California Cities Representative, explained to the Council
the details involved with this proposition. He asked the Council to approve the
draft Resolution supporting Proposition 46. Mr. Mullinax answered questions of •
Council.
PUBLIC COMMENT: None
MOTION: By Council Member Luna and seconded by Council Member Clay
to approve the draft Resolution supporting The Housing and
Emergency Shelter Trust Fund Act of 2002 — Proposition 46 on
the November 5, 2002 statewide ballot.
Motion passed 4:1 by a voice vote. (Scalise opposed)
(Resolution No. 2002-044)
COMMUNITY FORUM:
Debra McNulty, President of the UCP Board and Research Specialist for Parents
Helping Parents, spoke concerning Disability Awareness Month. She recognized
Sara Rose Young as a recipient of the 2002 Disability Achievement Award.
Martin Mamack, Executive Director SLOCO Access, recognized Matthew Shuck as
a recipient of the 2002 Disability Achievement Award.
CC 10/22/02 0 V 2
Page 2
ITEM NUMBER: A-1
DATE: 11/12/2002
• Erik Lewis, 2100 Ferrocarril, expressed his opposition of Ferrocarril being changed
from a cul-de-sac to a through street. He also submitted a petition signed by
neighbors on Ferrocarril. (Exhibit A)
Daphne Fahsing explained to the Council in a prepared statement, her concerns
with the current procedure for public access to City Council Minutes, and asked the
Council to reverse their previous decision on this subject. (Exhibit B)
Tom Gatus, 1200 San Ramon, pastor for 27 years in the community, speaking on
behalf of the Ministerial Association of Atascadero, requested that Council
meetings be opened with a prayer. Pastor Gatus stated that community pastors
would be willing to assume this responsibility.
There was Council consensus for the City Attorney
to prepare a staff report on this issue.
Robyn Burgess, 2755 Ferrocarril, gave her reasons for opposing Ferrocarril being
made a through street. She is in favor of the emergency access gate as presented
in alternative two of the road improvement plans.
Dale Burgess, 2755 Ferrocarril, read questions submitted by another concerned
neighbor regarding the De Anza Estates project.
JennyCorn, 2605 Ferrocarril, expressed her concerns regarding the De Anza
p 9 g
Estates project and making Ferrocarril a through street.
Brandon Pazar, asked the Council to leave his road the way it is because he and his
friends use the street and it would be safer if it did not go through.
Lynn Faith, 2845 Ferrocarril, asked how residents of this area would be notified of
the upcoming public hearing regarding the De Anza Estates project.
Gail Greshon, Big Brothers & Big Sisters, thanked the Council for the CDBG funds
allocation they received from the City.
Mayor Arrambide closed the Community Forum period.
COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS:
Council Member Luna thanked the Fire Department for the shredding/chipping
program, which has alleviated a lot of the underbrush and improved safety in the
community.
• Council Member Luna referred to a letter received from Planning Commissioner
Robert Jones about Conditional Use Permit 2002-0068, Big Brand Tires, and the
CC 10/22/02 0
Page 3
ITEM NUMBER: A-1
DATE: 11/12/2002
removal of some of the conditions of approval for the project. Council Member •
Luna stated he would like to appeal the approval of the CUP.
Council Member Johnson thanked the Police Department for their excellent work
and commented on the progress they have made in recent years to strengthen the
department.
A. CONSENT CALENDAR:
1 . City Council Minutes — October 2, 2002 and October 8, 2002
■ City Clerk recommendation: City Council approve the City Council minutes of October
2, 2002 and October 8, 2002. [City Clerk]
2. EI Camino Real Bikelanes, Phases 2 and 3
■ Fiscal impact: $263,710.00 (in FY 2002-2003 budget)
■ Staff recommendation: Council:
1. Approve Change Order Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 with a net amount of $21,256.80.
2. Authorize the Director of Administrative Services to appropriate $17,000 from the
Local Transportation Fund for this project.
3. Accept Souza Construction, Inc.'s work as complete.
4. Authorize the City Manager to sign and file the Notice of Completion. [Public Works]
MOTION: By Council Member Luna and seconded Council Member Clay to
approve the Consent Calendar.
Motion passed 5.0 by a roll-call vote.
B. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. Paloma Creek Park Playground Structure Replacement - California Integrated
Waste Management Board Grant Funds Resolution
■ Fiscal impact: Approval of this resolution will allow the City to apply for up to
$100,000 grant funding. If grant funding is authorized, the City would be required to
make a matched contribution.
■ Staff recommendation: Council approve the draft Resolution authorizing the City
Manager to apply for Grant Funds from the Park Playground Accessibility and Recycling
Grant Program under the State of California's Waste Tire Track and Other Recreation
Surfacing Grants Program for Fiscal Year 2002-2003. [Community Services]
Assistant City Manager / Community Services Director Brady Cherry gave the staff
report and answered questions of Council.
PUBLIC COMMENT: None
•
CC 10/22/02 F
Page 4
ITEM NUMBER: A—1
DATE: 11/12/2002
• MOTION: By Council Member Johnson and seconded by Council Member
Luna to approve the draft Resolution authorizing the City
Manager to apply for Grant Funds from the Park Playground
Accessibility and Recycling Grant Program under the State of
California's Waste Tire Track and Other Recreation Surfacing
Grants Program for Fiscal Year 2002-2003.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roU-call vote. (Resolution No. 2002-
0045)
Mayor Arrambide recessed the hearing at 7:57 p.m.
Mayor Arrambide called the meeting back to order at 8:05 p.m.
2. Zone Change 2002-0028 / Conditional Use Permit 2002-0065 / Tentative
Tract Map 2002-0016 (Tract 2489) - 1625, 1683, 1685 EI Camino Real
(Kelly Gearhart/Wilson Land Surveys)
■ Fiscal impact: Slight negative impact on City revenues — Single-family dwellings require
services that exceed the revenue generated by the dwelling.
■ Planning Commission recommendation:
1. Adopt draft Resolution A certifying the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration
• 2002-0035; and,
2. Introduce for first reading by title only, the draft Ordinance A, for the creation of a
new PD-17 overlay district; and,
3. Introduce for first reading by title only the draft Ordinance B approving Zone Change
2002-0028 rezoning the project site to RSF-X / PD-17 subject to a Master Plan of
Development; and,
4. Adopt draft Resolution B approving Conditional Use Permit 2002-0065 for the
Master Plan of Development subject to findings and conditions of approval; and,
5. Adopt draft Resolution C approving Tentative Tract Map 2002-0019, subject to
findings and conditions of approval. [Community Development]
Community Development Director Warren Frace gave the staff report and answered
questions of Council.
Council Member Luna stated he was concerned with the ratio of affordable units
coming from this project for the SFR-X zone and questioned how staff had arrived
at the number two for affordable units on this project.
Council Member Clay asked to make a presentation. Mayor Arrambide told him he
should wait until after the public comment period. Council Member Johnson stated
if we're going to let one Council Member make a presentation we should let all.
MOTION: By Council Member Luna and seconded by Council Member Clay
• to overrule the chair and allow Council Member Clay to make
his presentation.
Motion passed 4:1 by a roll-call vote. (Arrambide opposed)
CC 10/22/02 — 05
Page 5
ITEM NUMBER: A—1
DATE: 11/12/2002
Council Member Clay made his presentation addressing work force housing as it •
affects this and future projects currently being processed. He stated that every
property owner has the right, in his opinion, to develop their property as zoned, and
when the Planning Commission or City Council approve any density bonuses there
must be a condition or formula to assure that citizens of Atascadero have the right
of first refusal and guidelines to pursue homeownership on these additional units.
Council Member Clay would like to see these suggestions incorporated into this
project.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Russ Thompson, R. Thompson Consulting, representing the Applicant, Kelly
Gearhart, indicated that they are supportive of the staff report as approved by the
,Planning Commission, including the affordable housing clause. Mr. Thompson
discussed the project and its amenities and addressed several concerns raised by
Council. Regarding Council Member Clay's suggestion, he stated that Mr. Gearhart
would be open to including something similar in this project. Mr. Thompson
answered questions of Council.
Jenny Corn, 2605 Ferrocarril, stated the area of this project was more rural and
she would prefer larger lots and no streetlights.
Joan O'Keefe, 9985 Old Morro Road East appreciated pp d the honest discussion of the
issue of affordable housing. She felt this project continues the kind of residential
development unique to Atascadero and that where topography made it possible, it
was important to look at bonus densities.
Joanne Main, Atascadero Chamber of Commerce, stated the Chamber supports the
approval of this project.
Kelly Gearhart, Applicant, said he would like the opportunity to respond to issues
raised during Council discussions on his project.
Mayor Arrambide closed the Public Comment period.
Council Member Johnson stated one of the issues that concerns him on projects
like this is changing the rules after a project has been planned out. He feels it is
important to nail down these proposed new rules being discussed so that
developers will understand ahead of time what the numbers would be. He asked
the City Attorney how the suggestions made by Council Member Clay could be
worked into this project given the cooperation of the developer. Mr. Hanley
suggested a condition could be added stating, "A program acceptable to the
developer and staff would be entered into." This however, would be difficult for .
staff. Another possible alternative, if the overlay doesn't pass on second reading,
CC 10/22/02 b
Page 6
ITEM NUMBER: A-1
DATE: 11/12/2002
• would be to direct staff and applicant to come back with something in writing that
could be considered by Council.
Mayor Pro Tem Scalise felt it would be appropriate to direct staff to bring back a
report on how to handle deed restrictions to benefit the local work force. She feels
there is enough time left on this project to have staff come back with a report and
it is unnecessary to take action tonight.
Mayor Arrambide expressed concern that any additional requirements to this
project are potentially an additional cost or difficulty in sale and potentially a burden
on the developer. He feels that this condition has been allowed to exist and that it
is unfair for the developer to have to take up the slack. Mayor Arrambide does not
feel the additional condition would fit on this project.
Council Member Clay stated that he sees two situations: 1) Council must deal with
two or some other number of affordable units and that those units should be
offered first to the local work force, and 2) community members, at market rate
prices, should have first right of refusal, perhaps up to two weeks prior to
completion of the sale with an appropriate criteria. This could be brought back in
the second reading.
MOTION: By Council Member Clay and seconded by Council Member Luna
• in regard to the two affordable units and the additional 17 units,
that the developer and staff work together to provide some
criteria or verbiage where the people/work force of Atascadero
have first right of refusal on the 17 homes and that the two
affordable units be deed restricted to benefit local citizens.
Council Member Johnson felt the issue should be studied and brought back for
Council consideration.
Council Member Luna stated that as he sees it staff would work with the developer
and come back with a condition for the second reading.
Kelly Gearhart, applicant, indicated that he would like to have the project approved
tonight and the flexibility to work with staff on the details of the affordable units
and right of first refusal. He is in favor of these provisions, and feels he can be
relied upon to work out the details with staff.
Community Development Director Frace suggested this condition be added into
Resolutions B and C in items No. 4 and 5.
Council Member Clay called for the question.
•
CC 10122/02 7
Page 7
ITEM NUMBER: A-1
DATE: 11/12/2002
MOTION: By Council Member Clay and seconded by Council Member Luna •
in regard to the two affordable units and the additional 17 units,
that the developer and staff work together to provide some
criteria or verbiage where the people/work force of Atascadero
have first right of refusal on the 17 homes and that the two
affordable units be deed restricted to benefit local citizens and
that this condition be added to Resolutions No. B and C.
Motion passed 5.0 by a roll-call vote.
Council Member Clay expressed concern regarding the Planning Commission's
recommendation on the two affordable units and feels in-lieu fees should be
stricken.
MOTION: By Council Member Clay and seconded by Council Member Luna
to strike the portion of Conditions of Approval No. 28 and 63
which reads "or pay equivalent in-lieu fees to be determined by
staff."
Motion passed 4:0 by a roll-call vote. (Arrambide opposed)
MOTION: By Council Member Clay and seconded by Council Member Luna
that the two units designated as affordable not be contiguous.
Motion failed 2:3 by a voice vote. (Scalise, Johnson and •
Arrambide opposed)
MOTION: By Council Member Johnson and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem
Scalise to adopt draft Resolution A certifying the proposed
Mitigated Negative Declaration 2002-0035.
Motion passed 5.0 by a roll-call vote. (Resolution No. 2002-
046)
MOTION: By Council Member Johnson and seconded by Council Member
Clay to introduce for first reading by title only, the draft
Ordinance A. for the creation of a new PD-17 overlay district.
Motion passed 4:1 by a roll-call vote. (Luna opposed)
MOTION: By Council Member Johnson and seconded by Council Member
Clay to introduce for first reading by title only the draft
Ordinance B approving Zone Change 2002-0028 rezoning the
project site to RSF-X / PD-17 subject to a Master Plan of
Development.
Motion passed 4:1 by a roll-call vote. (Luna opposed)
•
CC 10/22/02
Page 8
ITEM NUMBER: A-1
DATE: 11/12/2002
• MOTION: By Council Member Johnson and seconded by Council Member
Clay to adopt draft Resolution B approving Conditional Use
Permit 2002-0065 for the Master Plan of Development subject
to findings and conditions of approval as amended.
Motion passed 4:1 by a roll-call vote. (Luna opposed)
(Resolution No. 2002-047)
MOTION: By Council Member Johnson and seconded by Council Member
Clay to adopt draft Resolution C approving Tentative Tract Map
2002-0019, subject to findings and conditions of approval as
amended.
Motion passed 4:1 by a roll-call vote. (Luna opposed)
(Resolution No. 2002-048)
C. MANAGEMENT REPORTS:
1. City Council Professional Development Reimbursement
■ Fiscal impact: None; future year impact could be as much as $46,462.20 ($15/month
maximum increase in compensation for Council Members; $75/month allowance to
offset City Council-related costs; and health insurance benefit coverage maximum cost
of $41,062.20/year).
■ Staff recommendation: Council direct staff to prepare an Ordinance, which sets forth
• compensation, benefits and allowances for elected officials. [City Manager]
City Manager Wade McKinney gave the staff report and answered questions of
Council. The Council discussed this issue at length.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Joan O'Keefe stated she agrees with Council Member Scalise that additional
compensation would be helpful in attracting more citizens who might not otherwise
be able to afford the time away from their job or the expenses involved in
becoming a Council Member.
Daphne Fahsing pointed out that most government agencies site the Consumer
Price Index at approximately 5 percent when asking for a raise. However, when
Social Security increases benefits they use the CPI figure of 1 .3 percent.
Mayor Arrambide closed the Public Comment period.
•
CC 10/22/02
Page 9 v`
ITEM NUMBER: A-1
DATE: 11/12/2002
MOTION: By Mayor Pro Tem Scalise to direct staff to come back with an
ordinance to set forth compensation to add benefits for elected •
officials allowing a $75 per month expense allowance to be
added to the already established stipend of $300 per month and
to incorporate health insurance that is in line with the City's
plan.
Motion failed for lack of a second.
MOTION: By Mayor Pro Tem Scalise and seconded by Council Member
Johnson to direct staff to come back with an ordinance to
adjust Council compensation to compliment Council's $300 per
month stipend with a $75 a month expense allowance.
Motion passed 4:1 by a roll-call vote. (Luna opposed)
D. COMMITTEE REPORTS:
Mayor Arrambide
1. S.L.O. Council of Governments (SLOCOG)/S.L.O. Regional Transit Authority (SLORTA):
After a difficult meeting on the Housing and Community Development (HCD) mandate of
18,035 for the entire county a tie vote was reached. A committee was put together to
work with HCD to see if they would negotiate further.
Council Member Johnson
1. Local Agency Formation Commissions (LAFCO): As Council Member Johnson goes off the
Council this position will be selected by the Mayors' Committee; if Council wishes to have
someone on the committee it should be considered at this time.
E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION:
1 . City Council
Council Member Clay reiterated that staff has been directed to look into the
affordable housing criteria.
Council Member Luna indicated that it was important to look at the General Plan
and decide how to achieve the numbers of affordable housing units so that when
projects go to the Planning Commission they know what the expected number of
units will be.
2. City Manager
Mr. McKinney reported that the Vehicle Junk Day and Special Trash Day is
Saturday, October 26th. Mr. McKinney distributed his written notes from the •
Mayors/City Managers' meeting to Council.
CC 10/22/02 1010
Page 10
ITEM NUMBER: A-1
DATE: 11/12/2002
• F. ADJOURNMENT:
Mayor Arrambide adjourned the meeting at 9:52 p.m. to the next regularly
scheduled meeting on November 12, 2002.
MEETING RECORDED AND MINUTES PREPARED BY:
Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk
The following exhibits are available for review in the City Clerk's office.
Exhibit A — Erik Lewis
Exhibit B — Daphne Fahsing
•
•
CC 10/22/02 O 1 l
Page 11
ITEM NUMBER: A-2
DATE: 11/12/2002
• �: ,. �...
rt
1 18• �,�+��19 9•-
\ CAD•�`awV
Atascadero City Council
City Treasurer David G. Graham, EA
City Treasurer's Agenda Report
RECOMMENDATION:
Council approve the City Treasurers reports for the following periods:
August 2002
September 2002
Discussion:
• The 2-year Treasury yield has risen slightly to 1.89% as of October 26, 2002 The LAIF yield for
September has also risen slightly to 2.604% on an increase in weighted average maturity of 19
days (188 day average). It appears that we have finally hit the bottom of the yield curve and have
begun what is forecast to be a slow economic recovery. The City yield in August was 3.08% or
95 basis points above the 2-year Treasury yield for that month. In September the City yield was
3.13% or 113 basis points above the 2-year treasury yield for that month.
Market conditions: At the September meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee the vote
was to leave the federal funds target rate unchanged at 1 3/4%. In a rare show of dissention at the
September meeting, Governor Gramlich and President McTeer unsuccessfully held out for a '/4
percent cut in the target rate. No target rate changes are anticipated by the Feds at the FOMC
meeting on November 6`i'. Any tightening by the Fed will probably not occur until well into
2003.
Investment Strategy: LAIF yields appear to have bottomed out and should begin a steady rise.
LAIF's guarantee of liquidity and mix of long and short-term maturities make it the preferred
investment for short and medium term funds. With the continuing flight from equities, Treasury
and Agency yields will remain low. FDIC insured negotiable CDs offer safety, optimum yields
and flexible liquidity for uncertain economic times. With favorable earnings reports, corporate
yields are now beginning to appear attractive for a few carefully selected, and well researched,
companies. The possibility of further corporate earnings restatements remains problematic.
•
612
City Treasurer's Report August 2002
David Graham •
REPORT IN BRIEF:
Cash and Investments
Checking $ 589,235
Money Market Accounts 220
Certificates of Deposit 4,653,586
Government Securities 1,249,031
Corporate Paper -
LAIF 16,001,988
Cash with Fiscal Agents 334,246
Cash in Banks at August 31,2002 $ 22,828,306
Deposits in Transit -
Outstanding Checks (314,928)
Cash and Investments at August 31,2002 $ 22,513,378
Investment Activity
Securities Purchased:
Purchase Date Description Type Cost Maturity Date
08/21/02 The People's National Bank CD $ 95,000 08/21/07
08/21/02 Home National Bank CD $ 95,000 08/21/07
08/30/02 National Bank of Commerce CD $ 99,000 08/08/07
08/30/02 Strategic Capital Bank CD $ 95,000 08/30/07
Securities Matured:
None
Securities Sold/Called Prior to Maturity:
Transaction/ Original Cost/ Gain/(Loss)
Transaction Date Description/Type Maturity Call Price on Call
Partial Call Fed'1 Home Loan Bank $ 93,574 $ 93,750 $ 176
08/22/02 Government Security 01/30/07
Other Reportable Activities:
None
•
- U13
Page 1 of 11
CITY OF ATASCADERO
TREASURER'S REPORT
• CASH&INVESTMENTS ACTIVITYSUMAL RY
FOR THE MONTH OF AUGUST 2002
CHECKING FISCAL
ACCOUNT INVESTMENTS AGENT TOTALS
Balance per Banks at
August 1,2002 $ 678,103 $ 22,550,730 $ 143,274 $ 23,372,107
Receipts 1,056,140 160 161 1,056,461
Disbursements (1,600,021) (241) - (1,600,262)
Transfers In 1,029,824 384,000 190,811 1,604,635
Transfers Out (574,811) (1,029,824) - (1,604,635)
Balance per Banks at
August 31,2002 $ 589,235 $ 21,904,825 $ 334,246 22,828,306
• Deposits in Transit -
Outstanding Checks (314,928)
Adjusted Treasurer's Balance $ 22,513,378
•
1
Page 2 of 11
00 0 00 0 0 0 0 o O 0 0
Ir 00 N M O O O O O O O r-
G1 N O. O O O O M
O Ly l� v1 v'i a\ W h N v1
OO V C1 C\ Q1 C\ C\ C% D\ CN C\
w �
U �
a h co c c \ cl \ o O
^C Z a c c Z c c c 0 c �
ry A
00 0 00 0 0 0 o O O o 0 0
00 N M O O O O O O O O O
C� N O O O O O O O O O O
00 G�1 c�1 001 GO1 C, ON CWi1 CO1
69
0 o e o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N C� O �1 V1 O V1 OtriO O
,44 h > O N
fV fV M M M �c 'IT r--: en 1�
A h o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
cry Z c v„'i 0 o o 0 0
fV M M M M l�
qAl WV
c ctl cd c0 c c nS c cd cd a7 -,
;rmO h a
E. w o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
V � Z � a¢i a¢i api aRi aai m a¢i a¢i a¢i aQi
k1 a, A A A A A A A A A A
h a w w w w w w w w w w
N o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
aj u Q
> c c cc
Q (1) 0 V (U di
U U U U U
W o 0 a\ o
U Z O O O O N O N
Q �_ G ON 0 00 OO C 0
O O O O O O O O
C
U
0
vcd
x a x U
ti ,wj > in
.x v 18,
p
� W V1
yam" `>' � a � U 3x � 3 `T Q z c
04 t� O c x o `�,° m U E eco, CIS � U
G 4) O z r+ y0 O N Q cC
Q b aLi ..a c Oq U 'O !Q c
U u o a 0 b .� c o R K U
O �y L RS cC .0 c K c L O c +... Cti p •
•o .a as �n ¢ zc) � a AA aE= 33 Uva � 3 v� En zV)
N N N N M M Cl) M M Cl)
� LLQ C O O O O O O O O O O
e O o N
h CC% C% c\i �� N N M wl h o„
CD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 o ON 0 0 0 0 0 0 �0 0
h o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o kn o 0
0 0 0 o cl 0 0 0 o O n o 0
O W t- t` kn rn v a; CN 0*1 a; t- %0 vi to
C% ON O\ G1 C\ C\ C% ON O\ G1 0, CN CT
h h
� z
hcqs1� ro ea
717 G C
w U ..
�C ti
a A
0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 o co o 0 0 o O o 0 0 0
CWd a
CN cs c% CN CN CN O, rn CN C', ON
w
6n
A e o o e o 0 o a o
�l to kn o o eh to kn o o kn o kn 'vi
ti Iq Iq v, v o 0 0 v, n t` IIR
,r V' 't It "It
W h14
o 0 0 0 0 o e o o
h to kn o 0 0 to kn o o kn %n kn to
v1 Yl U1 et O O O Yl : N t� "O
M M
gGLo WV
O ai Cd ea cC c\a l m \ .
y h c a Z a Z a a a a a r,
h v
ti c
o`q.
h O O O O O O O O O O O O O
U ti Z a cL a a a a a cL a a o a c.
W A A A A A A A A A A A A A
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
j v v v v v v v v cl
u ca
x U
U U U U U U U U U U U U CJ
o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o rn o 0 0 0
en In C
h kn M a C) N N V N O � C \ N OO O M 00
C) W OO Q\ O1 O\ C) M � CO
O C> O O O O O O O O O O O
U
cl
pi z cd
cqs
Cd
A ~ cd
c°e a! w 8 ao a Z ' ¢ w 0 3 .N c d e Z a Q
W) CT C o a� w c K vo w _ `lCd
C7
Cd
• aai O '� C Cd 7 cl cc O t. c O q rte. 'C C aa y A °p
wco aw rS, E UU as tza Uw p � cvi ww O > A
w'
wz >
�iO O O O O O O O O O O O O
v
a h %n to 't to CT N N tn N n Oen en
O M
Q' O O 00 O O O O O O C) 0 \ \ N
O O O 00 O O O O O O O M
O O O N O O O O O O O V
Z O O O n O O O O O O O O
O �
G1 ON p1 01 O\ O\ ON ON ON vi C1
� � N
Z N
-Cal C C C t\
V v v
a A
O O O O O O O O O O O O
O O O O O O O O O O O O
O O o O o 0 C 0 0 0 C C
CN CN CN (7N
� N
69
N try N kn O Yl O O O O O .en V1
V '[t : l� IO "O O
M M M M M M cj' et •ct et
0 0 o e o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 � \ o \ c \ \ \ \ \ o o o
[� �+ V1 v) Vl O %n O O O O O M O
y \fy+ �t 'ct v1 �O �O v1 v1 O O G\
M M M M M M .� M
0
Q
fr
cl 03
rol
A a o w V
[ti o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C o
V � � aai aai aRi aAi aRi aAi aai � aai a��i v aQi
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � o
C7 0 0 q 0 U N N N U U U y
c c E �s
U U U U U U U U U U
>
U U U U U U U U U U C7 U
w N N N N
O O O O O O O O O O O O
en � � � tn
[�V eq M D\ O O N b C)Q O N N O O N N O O O O
a' f� M N N ON .�-. .�. N
aO O O O �--� �-» O O .-" O O
a
MQ� U
L
Q "� 19 app �C xC,' Ey u�� d !.
cc
el
Cd
Z U z C 3
Z O
C a z Cd cd cl
X y moi. xi a0+ C CQ E•^ b N rn ^� rx h ai
cc
y _6 0
cn C7 CQ d U 0.1 W U G� d F C7 f� � d A U A 65 65 D a
v v v v v v v v v v v wl
64 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
C> R R
h O r- O O 7 O N 7
N vii C� C14
W') vwi ON CN O O
O O �-+ p
o o 0 0 0 0 o v O o 0 00
h o 0 0 0 o O o o v o 0 0 00
o0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 o0 C o O �o
r- 01, O; CT ON c�
[� C\ CT C\ G1 O\ C% ON N C1 C1 ON
N
0 a
• ti 69
as cts
cz
kn
en
'G OV v
� A
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o O O o 0
o O o 0 0 0 o O o o O o 0
V O CT C% C% CT C\ C\ tn N O1 C% CCN kn
N
69
Q o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
'J 00 O kn v1 O O vi O M
v1 N N r� l- M oo O [� O Oo O N
,y 00 et M M t+'1 'c1' th M v1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O v1 to O h vi O O O In O O
v1 N t- M OR O ll O oo O N
y c n cr M M ei' M M M Nr to
q Q4 WCC
cV cC «S eV ...i
M
b
Fi E� O O O O O O O O 'F., O O O
U ti a a a o a a a a o a a a o
N U N N N N N O U U N N U
w w w w w w w w
F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7�4 14E
x z z >
aD o ami ami ami o
U U U U U U U U C7 U U U C7
O N N N N N N N N N N
O O O O O O O O O O O O O
h O C\ O cqa r- N O 'IT b q O N N \ O \ N N O
C> l� C> !� C>
O O O O O O O O O O O
O.
L
L ++ p
y y i o U
i 3 H v o
a scq% m � A oa MOS y u
cl 0
o cl
CO i. e� CQ yam, ►��" o.� N
�" � .d Q '}� Ago U C eC ►•a M Fy� ¢ d
LO Z = y U O V UN b�+
cn
0 0 o a .o °�° o z Don x a A � o -40
Qj
. a w o W O
A ev o L ca T*
U Z Z a oa � v� C7 c7 a U w U
Fes+ �n k, to v, kn to
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
E.
h Q OO N N ` Z O � ` \ \ N N O
Q o 0 0 0 0
h o C> 0 0 0 o N v v n
Yl O O O O O o0 N N O
QW Okn G1 C% C% CN O M M M
h N N M M N
O W N N
69 69 yg
O
^ co Cd ^ ^ O
N Cd e\V N N O
4) E=
O O O O O O e4
O O O O O
O O O O O O N N N 7 U
C,1 a N N
ON 01 G1 G1 � en en
M M N •�T' ,''
N N Cd
E A
X
V3 69 d9 T .N
V 7 °
O Qall
OO
h vi
It
+�+ h c w
„per �L 3 y
q h o 0 0 0 0 0 ts
ts
q u o W V W s y
�' ¢ ¢
0 Z c c �`c ¢ o >
caE
ti O N
a
O ; h i. 4 O O O O b V
W U) A A A A b �, Cd
ti a 0 0 0 0
o 0
C Q U
V 0 U U U
W N N N N N N O •`• O
h cv o 0 o c o ° ~
0
(� N M N N M
a A
0 0 0 Cl 0 0 0 Q
U
ti y
o °
O U
vyi ai aLJ c02 A M Q. W O
d d 8 oa °tn
y
rl0 ° Cd
�i ee is C7 o e cl F Cd
a a�
L P. c .° g 3 y a y 3 O v i
U j •
�D
W U Grr U Z �n F � y' fA � U � � x Y �
C a� cd
h N M 000 O «s cl U b
D W �
h � N O N N \ � .n N
Q o 0 0 0 0 0
3 U >
City of Atascadero
Investments by Type
is
August 2002
Gov't Cash with
Securities Fiscal Agent
Certificates of Deposit 6% B
21% 2% Other
0%
s
•
LAIF
71%
Investment August 2002
LAIF $ 16,001,988
Certificates of Deposit 4,653,586
Government Securities 1,249,031
Corporate Paper -
Cash with Fiscal Agent 334,246
Other 220
$ 22,239,071
•
Page 8of11 U20
City of Atascadero
Investments by Maturity
August 2002 •
One Month
Within to One Year One to Five Years
One Month 5% 21%
1%
x,
3 yS
i�
•
On Demand
73%
Investment August 2002
On Demand $ 16,002,208
Within One Month 237,038
One Month to One Year 1,053,482
One to Five Years 4,612,096
$ 21,904,825
•
Page 9 of 11 6 2 L
City of Atascadero
Investments by Custodial Agent
• August 2002
RBC Dain Rauscher Bank of
Penson 19% New York City of
Financial Corp. 2% Atascadero
8% 0%
--------------
r
State of California
71%
Custodial Agent August 2002
State of California $ 16,001,988
Penson Financial Corp. 1,704,399
RBC Dain Rauscher 4,151,400
Riverway Trust -
Bank of New York 334,246
City of Atascadero 47,038
$ 22,239,071
•
C"12
Page 10 of 11
City of Atascadero
Investment Yield vs. 2-Year Treasury Yield
For the Year Ended August 31,2002 •
5.00%
4.50%
4.00%
3.50% ,
3.00%
2.50%
2.00%
1.50%
1.00%
0.50%
0.00%
00^ 00^ 00� 00^ 00^ 00� 00� 00� 00� 00� OOry OOry 00�
PQM\
Sege O� ore e� Qe PJ
-City Yield --4m-2-Yr Treasury Yield
2-Yr
Treasury
City Yield Yield
August 2001 4.74% 3.76%
September 2001 4.54% 3.12%
October 2001 4.08% 2.73%
November 2001 3.91% 2.78%
December 2001 3.66% 3.11%
January 2002 3.52% 3.03%
February 2002 3.50% 3.02%
March 2002 3.45% 3.56%
April 2002 3.33% 3.42%
May 2002 3.23% 3.26%
June 2002 3.18% 2.99%
July 2002 3.13% 2.56% •
August 2002 3.08% 2.13%
Page 11 of 11
City Treasurer's Report September 2002
avid Graham
REPORT IN BRIEF:
Cash and Investments
Checking $ 1,353,834
Money Market Accounts 241
Certificates of Deposit 4,754,655
Government Securities 1,249,031
Corporate Paper _
LAIF 14,551,988
Cash with Fiscal Agents 143,064
Cash in Banks at September 30,2002 $ 22,052,813
Deposits in Transit _
Outstanding Checks (341,677)
Cash and Investments at September 30,2002 $ 21,711,136
Investment Activity
Securities Purchased:
Purchase Date Description Type Cost Maturity Date
09/05/02 Oak Hill Banks CD $ 97,000 09/05/07
09/06/02 Nbank of Commerce CD $ 99,000 09/06/07
09/12/02 Frances Slocum Bank&Trust CD $ 95,000 09/12/07
Securities Matured:
Maturity Date Description Type Original Cost Amount Matured
09/16/02 National Republic Bank CD $ 95,000 $ 95,000
09/17/02 Midwest Bank of McHenry CD $ 95,000 $ 95,000
Securities Sold/Called Prior to Maturity:
None
Other Reportable Activities:
None
•
U
Page 1 of 11
CITY OF ATASCADERO
TREASURER'S REPORT
CASH&INVESTMENTS ACTIVITYSUMMARY •
FOR THE MONTH OF SEPTEMBER 2002
CHECKING FISCAL
ACCOUNT INVESTMENTS AGENT TOTALS
Balance per Banks at
September 1,2002 $ 589,235 $ 21,904,825 $ 334,246 $ 22,828,306
Receipts 1,126,091 90 199 1,126,380
Disbursements (1,710,492) - (191,381) (1,901,873)
Transfers In 1,640,000 291,000 1,931,000
Transfers Out (291,000) (1,640,000) - (1,931,000)
Balance per Banks at
September 30,2002 $ 1,353,834 $ 20,555,915 $ 143,064 22,052,813
Deposits in Transit - •
Outstanding Checks (341,677)
Adjusted Treasurer's Balance $ 21,711,136
•
025
Page 2 of 11
Wh h v o o°Oo C> w o c.
o rn h li of v°Oi e v
W �
j V �
• o 00 o M v po o pp n o 0 0 C,
F N vniO O O h O O
W W V h 0 Vl V1 10 v1 V Vl 00 00 V O O
?� ►� N V' 0` 0` 0\ 0% a T 0\ D\ Cl 0\
b
b9
F oo m O O O O ^ O O O O O O D`
0o v o 0 o g o o r o o O o 0
Z a1 N O O O �+ O M O O O O O'
h vl vi N of V t� [� Vi 0\ V W N 0` 0\ T C, 0, D` Q\ Qt C, 0\
F � v
U Z
ti
u>
4
A
00 00 0 0 o O O O o 0 0 0 o
0o v o O O o O O p o 0 0 0
C N O O O O O O O O O O O
l� O� ofvi vi vi vi of a` vi
Cl O\ T 0+ al a T D\ T Q\
� y
cL a
va
a
O F ti C 0 0 a o vo o civ h oN v v
N N r-
A a c
Ly N _
o C) a � � :vOi g O v'^i vii vOi v � en
N M M
it"
F w a a a a 0 0 0 a a 0klll� a a
ww w w w w w w w w w w w
c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
w- ec
r z r r r x r 'IE 'r 'r
u u u uuuvu uuuuu
o 0 0 0 o a o g o 0 0 0 0
p o 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0
y
e
Y S
C A
W y > u Ra
Ell
14d vUi �u ? G1 O 0.1 i i c u R 00
• R c Y :° u au �' >
a a ca �n ¢ DA aE= 33 UC4rnvj ZC4 xm aw 'w [- iwx vU
a
d
tl O O O O O O O O O O O O O
O � O � � N O � O
F
ZS O N N M '7 h t� 00 p� A
Oa O O Q O O O a O Q O O
W �
z
j V �
M O O O 7 ,^° O N ,ND 10 10
M M N O O O •
F v o 0 o C;, n O h o 0 C .- N C o g
j 8 °� a °: t- h o w o0 00 00 b yr vi
V a a o, a C, a a o a a a C, a a a
sv
F. 0 C. 0 o g h c $ $ 0 0 00 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 o w o o a o o o 0 0 0
O W a a C; a t- 10 vi h a n 10 t` 10rn v,
a a a C, a a a a C, a a a a a a a
U Z
ti
vi
td ttl N R td ttl td i3 t3 td N N t0 ett tC
U
4 C
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
C C C 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 C C 0
V jC, oC C, C, t` t- v v ° rz e n n
a a C, C, a a a a C, a C, a a a a a
C V
A o e e o e e e e a e o e e e o e
h rn a v, v v n
� 7 V
IT ,D M M d' 7
qa°, o
04
W N
CVi� q A e o e e o e e o e e e e e oe o
IW. v n o o h n n n n n n o n o O o
v, v N t` e d 7 v to
•� LLQ ,p h a V v ,G e+i t+i 7 O M t+i ni ri c•i e+i v 7
aoi v u� gi Si ami �a� n 4 a o
W W A q A q A A A q A A A A A q A A
w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
W a a A a � w a m
s a a
t= eC w w to t'-°, tr. to w to
ti z x z f r r r
A
O, C, C, O, M [� 00 M N
O O O Cl O O O O O O O O .-. O O
4
Z U
cc y C Y
r.
4i try ty C vi GQ typ z p Y y e.0
Cd
d OZ CA
e a M V ¢ s at h a Y w `o O c (� Z O i °a
_ x
m c
y H iC C Y kr ° 55 3 y y C N •
ee c
E- 1 e c i s ' q b d °' o C e " o r has 9
wa wC) Uw C7 � oav, ww Ow A > na � ¢ Uoa wU 'w 'w � ¢ A
C, a O, O N N N N Vl rn h C,
p�
Q O O O -r O O O O O O O O O O O[Lf!
b
• O O S b O OO O S O Qp o W O O
O O O O O
W W hvi O O O v vi (� l� P a G�
S� Q\ Q\ T. O a O+ D\ Q\ T Q\ T 7 D\ P
E� e N ry
69
O O OM D\ O O O O O O O 7 O O
O O O �G O O O O O O O p S O
O O O O oo OO O O O O S
Q\ h a\ D\Q\ T a\ O\ Q\ D\ N 12, 1:1
InIn
..
00 ..
0
0.
A
0 o S o 0 0 o 0 o S o o g o 0
O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
r v o vivi � C, � o, vl o rn a
D\ Q\ N 0\ S Q` D\ D` Q\ D\ D\ Cl N a Q\
b9
A e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e
O h O O N Vl N N t� 1� M 00 O l� O 00
4 � O
e e e e e
O O M O O
M OR O r O OR v'
m e.
° w � z
w �
O. 0. 0. N• 0. 0. p, O C O O
c.
w w w w w w w w w w w w w
o 0 0 0 o c o 0
j v v v v v v v v v v v E v v
ec w w-
z > x K t: >
U U C7 U U U U U U U U U 0 U U
N N O N N N N N N N N
-4 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
N r b h vY O T O .N-.
O O O O O \ N O N
A ... ... b N r M O n izz n n n n
O O O O O O O O O O O
C6
i
O y.
3 U
Z F eoa O
L 3 H V
d
ti R 04 pq
c .�" pa o W Y 0 A GC d `"
L1 �.. ."�-� c 'b °J 'd' a is u eoa U
u ai c d °" °� Q
Z
zFU z ¢
C 'ufli ca 0. C ca t es C >, O y d V] O o
• u a e yU Z .r Y
6. d> � v a x � Y ai V -
5 0
e a"i C y .. C '. ;J a m >{ o p� o A.
cLa 's i � v e
W cn p a p ►, w ., Z ca A
v� C7 C7 w U w U Co n O a
a W o o 0 0 0 0 0 o
10 p o 0 0 0 0
[r o v M o r4 v o n v
00
•
O 0O°O O w 10
O N n b 00 O h a, •M. �O b r
w O b v^ O In O 0o h O h [' O O O O
Q` Q\ o+ O V V' In h h h M 7 M M h
►� Ol V V vl o` o\ D\ o, a C\ O� h ^ •f
V N N N ° 00
•e, N ... N
fiof Nf afi
O O O O O O O O S b r
Lt, wCo �O vl O O O O O O O O °� O O O�
Q\ Qi of o vl v1 vi a, t` a 1 h M M oo
O\ N -It N o\ C` o, o\ o\ Q` of h b
Ll Qn N N
fA 69 yg
�C .N^.. O at O etl N td tC R �tl N N N N
M M
4 A
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o h v
0 0 0 0 C 0 C 0 o M o o
Q\ O O O h h h of h O M M M
V ►� °` N N N Q\ Q` T °� (71a Q\ 7 n
� N
d1 69 V/
~ o e e e o o e o 0 o e o
V o M h o o h o 0 0 0 0 °p
O o N O O O O O O O V N
V It V '7 V V V O = T V .
N y
q 0. o a'
N a H
o e Z W �
y �'
a 'o
41, odi k?
It
ti y
N
v
[r O •C 'C .O •O •O o •O .O •O
m
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � ca
d d v a 2 2 2 2 2 u w E
M
e� E E Et !E w eE e�
> > C X z x x r x F oq
U r3 O C7 U U U U U U U F
X
cC
kl O
Ly O OO O O O O �O O O O O - •p
O h �D N U
a Q 10 N M h 00 00 W 00 T 7
� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 CD 0 �
4 m
U
a)
L
ttl
o ci u u 1
U m w y c E T M
co
eCa W ° o ° o
t7 r] N ea N is C7 o at i
d pE 7 FId 0
"
c0
F
A eCa d C4' M T M Z M a A eC ,d0 �_ O w v G d o y p' w
oa 0 a ea Ta a c �i ° Z 3 e'n 0. c Y E d u 3 ° N 0 b
C:
d d `u a`, o 'G M as x ar E ° RRe 6 u y ❑ �° a�
m i u
U W w u ami ie s o .' A Z U W 3 m G w j: •
U W U
a to ig
►•7 F' V O N N O M O O N N
eV ttVV �L LU. 0N�N0 �
A n N m Vl w 000 Oi0 DO C,
N
o
I N y
4.
H
N Cy
N F
7 F-'
U
cd
O C
l 6 'a
x Q
CIS CIS
I p 0
o •C
a a
O Er ca 'o
U4 3
o �
cLcY�4
V �YQ
y C F d a
G
.y •y
G �
N y
y
°
4.
°
O ¢ �
L7'G
U y
� ° a
.r E
o
o
w °
O �
°
O 3 N
vl
v
y y
V �
CIS
C t
� V
oj
W 7
O C D
cc p N
u
U �= F
City of Atascadero
Investments by Type
September 2002
•
Gov't
Securities Cash with
Certificates of Deposit 6% Fiscal Agent
23% 1% Other
0%
z
LAIF
70%
Investment September 2002
LAIF $ 14,551,988
Certificates of Deposit 4,754,655
Government Securities 1,249,031
Corporate Paper -
Cash with Fiscal Agent 143,064
Other 241
$ 20,698,979
031
Page 8 of 11
City of Atascadero
Investments by Maturity
September 2002
•'I
One Month
Within to One Year One to Five Years
One Month 7% 22%
0% y
On Demand
71%
Investment September 2002
On Demand $ 14,552,229
Within One Month 47,108
One Month to One Year 1,445,391
One to Five Years 4,511,187
$ 20,555,915
•I
Page 9 of 11 31 2
City of Atascadero
Investments by Custodial Agent
September 2002
•
RBC Dain Rauscher Bank of
20% New York City of
Penson 2% Atascadero
Financial Corp. 0%
9% s'
s
State of California
70%
Custodial Agent September 2002
State of California $ 14,551,988
Penson Financial Corp. 1,898,399
RBC Dain Rauscher 4,058,420
Riverway Trust -
Bank of New York 143,064
City of Atascadero 47,108
$ 20,698,979
Page 10 of 11 '�it
City of Atascadero
Investment Yield vs. 2-Year Treasury Yield
For the Year Ended September 30, 2002
5.00%
4.50%
4.00-
3.50%
3.00%
x.
"
M
I
2.50%
F'
2.00%
4 n
1.50%
1.00%
0.50%
0.00°/O
Op' Op'` pp'� pp'� pp`Y pp'L pp`L OO`L pp`L pp`L pp`L pp`L pp`L
`���e�'L Glo�e�ti eF�e`� ��e�'L a�J�c1� �`Jac1ry �`m�4rry PQc�ry �a�ry 'Jomry �J��'Y oAJy`� ���e`ry
-0-City Yield 2-Yr Treasury Yield
2-Yr
Treasury
City Yield Yield
September 2001 4.54% 3.12%
October 2001 4.08% 2.73%
November 2001 3.91% 2.78%
December 2001 3.66% 3.11%
January 2002 3.52% 3.03%
February 2002 3.50% 3.02%
March 2002 3.45% 3.56%
April 2002 3.33% 3.42%
May 2002 3.23% 3.26%
June 2002 3.18% 2.99%
July 2002 3.13% 2.56%
August 2002 3.08% 2.13%
September 2002 3.13% 2.00%
Page 11 of 11
034
ITEM NUMBER: p _ 3
DATE: 11/12/2002
1. 111111C milliti
1979
CADS//
Atascadero City Council
$taffReport-Administrative Services Department
SEPTEMBER 2002 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE & PAYROLL
RECOMMENDATION
Approve certified City accounts payable,payroll and payroll vendor checks for September 2002.
DISCUSSION
Attached for City Council review and approval are the following:
Payroll
Dated 09/13/02 Checks# 15205 - 15319 $ 117,245.47
Direct Deposits 69,975.08
• Dated 09/20/02 Checks# 15320 - 15431 113,355.78
Direct Deposits 73,406.88
Accounts Payable
Dated September 1-30,2002 Checks # 86061 - 86451 &EFTs 163 - 174 1,366,437.02
TOTAL AMOUNT $ 1,740,420.23
FISCAL IMPACT
Total expenditures for all funds is $ 1,740,420.23
CERTIFICATION
The undersigned certifies that the attached demands have been released for payment and
that funds are available for these demands.
Qc
Rachelle Rickard,Administrative Services Director
Approved by the City Council at a meeting held November 12, 2002.
•' Marcia M.Torgerson,City Clerk
ATTACHMENT: September 2002 Eden Warrant Register in the amount of $ 1,740,420.23
i f'S
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of September 2002
Check Check
Number Date Vendor Description Amount
164 9/3/2002 MID-STATE BANK Payroll Vendor Payment 31,042.71
163 9/4/2002 MID-STATE BANK Accounts Payable Check 192.61
86061 9/6/2002 KEITH AGGSON Accounts Payable Check 200.00
86062 9/6/2002 ALLAN HANCOCK COLLEGE Accounts Payable Check 110.00
86063 9/6/2002 ANN BANKS Accounts Payable Check 20.00
86064 9/6/2002 DALE A.BYWATER Accounts Payable Check 3,510.00
86065 9/6/2002 CALPERS CONFERENCE 2002 Accounts Payable Check 250.00
86066 9/6/2002 CHARNLEY&GUSTASON DEVELOPMEN Accounts Payable Check 5,500.00
86067 9/6/2002 BRADY CHERRY Accounts Payable Check 400.00
86068 9/6/2002 CITY OF ATASCADERO Accounts Payable Check 176.71
86069 9/6/2002 JERRY L.CLAY,SR. Accounts Payable Check 120.00
86070 9/6/2002 JOHN COUCH Accounts Payable Check 100.00
86071 9/6/2002 BRIAN DANA Accounts Payable Check 30.00
86072 9/6/2002 EDEN SYSTEMS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 950.00
86073 9/6/2002 WARREN FRACE Accounts Payable Check 300.00
86074 9/6/2002 ANDREW FRUIN Accounts Payable Check 1,085.
86075 9/6/2002 GAS COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 89 jb
86076 9/6/2002 KENNETH GLYNN Accounts Payable Check 308.00
86077 9/6/2002 DENNIS HEGWOOD Accounts Payable Check 20.00
86078 9/6/2002 HOBBY SHOP Accounts Payable Check 903.10
86079 9/6/2002 VALERIE HUMPHREY Accounts Payable Check 12.41
86080 9/6/2002 J&S SWEEPING SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 380.00
86081 9/6/2002 STEVEN KAHN Accounts Payable Check 544.29
86082 9/6/2002 LESLYN KEITH Accounts Payable Check 70.00
86083 9/6/2002 CHUCK KENDRICK Accounts Payable Check 102.00
86084 9/6/2002 LEONARD J.LA CASTO Accounts Payable Check 85.00
86085 9/6/2002 KARA LEES Accounts Payable Check 150.00
86086 9/6/2002 ROSEMARY S.LUSARDI Accounts Payable Check 151.20
86087 9/6/2002 MARRIOTT LAX AIRPORT Accounts Payable Check 237.12
86088 9/6/2002 BECKY MAXWELL Accounts Payable Check 19.23
86089 9/6/2002 WADE MCKINNEY Accounts Payable Check 760.00
86090 9/6/2002 PAUL MILLER Accounts Payable Check 102.00
86091 9/6/2002 P.L.A.Y.,INC. Accounts Payable Check 75.00
86092 9/6/2002 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC Accounts Payable Check 256•
City of Ataseadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of September 2002
Check Check
tuber Date Vendor Description Amount
86093 9/6/2002 VOID Accounts Payable Check 0.00
86094 9/6/2002 GRACE L.PUCCI Accounts Payable Check 112.50
86095 9/6/2002 RACHELLE RICKARD Accounts Payable Check 300.00
86096 9/6/2002 CAROLE ROBINSON Accounts Payable Check 30.00
86097 9/6/2002 STEVE ROMO Accounts Payable Check 51.00
86098 9/6/2002 LISETTE SCHOLL Accounts Payable Check 121.80
86099 9/6/2002 JOHN SIEMENS Accounts Payable Check 222.40
86100 9/6/2002 TOM SILVA Accounts Payable Check 152.00
86101 9/6/2002 SOUZA CONSTRUCTION INC. Accounts Payable Check 84,057.70
86102 9/6/2002 KURT W.STONE Accounts Payable Check 170.00
86103 9/6/2002 MARCIA TORGERSON Accounts Payable Check 39.42
86104 9/6/2002 JEFF VAN DEN EIKHOF Accounts Payable Check 159.88
86105 9/6/2002 VAN METER&ASSOCIATES Accounts Payable Check 210.00
86106 9/6/2002 VOID Accounts Payable Check 0.00
86107 9/6/2002 VOID Accounts Payable Check 0.00
86108 9/6/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS Accounts Payable Check 113.19
86109 9/6/2002 ERIC VITALE Accounts Payable Check 1,395.58
.I 86110 9/6/2002 WESTIN LONG BEACH Accounts Payable Check 338.48
86111 9/6/2002 MELANIE WHALEY Accounts Payable Check 111.58
86112 9/6/2002 TERRY ANN WILLINGHAM Accounts Payable Check 40.98
86113 9/6/2002 WYNDHAM FRANKLIN PLAZA Accounts Payable Check 830.40
86114 9/9/2002 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE CO Payroll Vendor Payment 756.07
86115 9/9/2002 COLONIAL LIFE&ACCIDENT INS. Payroll Vendor Payment 1,949.39
86116 9/9/2002 CPIC LIFE Payroll Vendor Payment 1,535.65
86117 9/9/2002 DELTA DENTAL,ATTN:ACCOUNTING Payroll Vendor Payment 7,407.62
86118 9/9/2002 EQUITABLE LIFE Payroll Vendor Payment 348.88
86119 9/9/2002 LIFEGUARD INC. Payroll Vendor Payment 44,449.13
86120 9/12/2002 ADAM C.COLLINS Accounts Payable Check 146.84
86137 9/12/2002 ACTION TOWING Accounts Payable Check 45.00
86138 9/12/2002 BRIAN ALLEE Accounts Payable Check 22.63
86139 9/12/2002 ALLSTAR FIRE EQUIPMENT,INC. Accounts Payable Check 285.29
86140 9/12/2002 AMERICAN SANITATION Accounts Payable Check 64.35
86141 9/12/2002 AMERICAN WEST TIRE&AUTO INC Accounts Payable Check 15.00
• 86142 9/12/2002 ANDERSON'S AUTO SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 189.66
86143 9/12/2002 ANTECH DIAGNOSTICS Accounts Payable Check 29.75
UJ t
City of Ataseadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of September 2002
Check Check
Number Date Vendor Description Amount
86144 9/12/2002 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 49110.
86145 9/12/2002 AT&T Accounts Payable Check 32.44
86146 9/12/2002 ATASCADERO FORD Accounts Payable Check 2,997.26
86147 9/12/2002 ATASCADERO MUTUAL WATER CO. Accounts Payable Check 16,692.80
86148 9/12/2002 ATASCADERO NEWS Accounts Payable Check 300.00
86149 9/12/2002 ATASCADERO RUBBER STAMP CO Accounts Payable Check 40.76
86150 9/12/2002 AVAYA INC. Accounts Payable Check 22.41
86151 9/12/2002 BEN MEADOWS Accounts Payable Check 1,008.47
86152 9/12/2002 LORI BICKEL Accounts Payable Check 60.00
86153 9/12/2002 CAPRCBM Accounts Payable Check 165.00
86154 9/12/2002 CASCADE FIRE EQUIPMENT CO Accounts Payable Check 14.14
86155 9/12/2002 CASHIERS OFFICE Accounts Payable Check 346.50
86156 9/12/2002 CDF ACCOUNTING OFFICE Accounts Payable Check 55.00
86157 9/12/2002 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL CED Accounts Payable Check 390.73
86158 9/12/2002 CENTRAL COAST LOCK&KEY Accounts Payable Check 85.00
86159 9/12/2002 CENTRAL COAST PLUMBING SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 9.22
86160 9/12/2002 CENTRAL COAST PROPANE,INC. Accounts Payable Check 387.9
86161 9/12/2002 CENTRAL COAST SANITATION Accounts Payable Check 107
86162 9/12/2002 CERTIFIED FOLDER DISPLAY SVC Accounts Payable Check 2,440.56
86163 9/12/2002 CFCA SO-CAL T.O.'S Accounts Payable Check 30.00
86164 9/12/2002 CFCA-EMS SECTION SOUTHERN DIV Accounts Payable Check 150.00
86165 9/12/2002 CHEM CLEAN Accounts Payable Check 116.27
86166 9/12/2002 CHEM-DRY OF NORTH COUNTY Accounts Payable Check 162.00
86167 9/12/2002 CHEVRON Accounts Payable Check 1,574.14
86168 9/12/2002 CHICAGO GRADE LANDFILL,INC. Accounts Payable Check 258.60
86169 9/12/2002 CHIEF SUPPLY,INC. Accounts Payable Check 170.06
86170 9/12/2002 VOID Accounts Payable Check 0.00
86171 9/12/2002 CLEAN WATER SYSTEMS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 35.00
86172 9/12/2002 COAST ELECTRONICS Accounts Payable Check 3,795.15
86173 9/12/2002 RUTH COBB Accounts Payable Check 20.00
86174 9/12/2002 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER Accounts Payable Check 131.00
86175 9/12/2002 CUESTA COLLEGE Accounts Payable Check 123.58
86176 9/12/2002 CUESTA EQUIPMENT Accounts Payable Check 70.02
86177 9/12/2002 DARRYL'S LOCK AND SAFE Accounts Payable Check 85.05
86178 9/12/2002 DATAPRINT CORPORATION Accounts Payable Check 340
86180 9/12/2002 DECOU LUMBER COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 1,909.
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of September 2002
Check Check
tuber Date Vendor Description Amount
86181 9/12/2002 DIRECT SAFETY COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 54.65
86182 9/12/2002 DMV RENEWAL Accounts Payable Check 47.00
86183 9/12/2002 DOGGIE WALK BAGS COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 1,527.73
86184 9/12/2002 DONALD JACOBS DISTRIBUTING Accounts Payable Check 352.09
86185 9/12/2002 DOUBLE D FEED&SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 77,76
86186 9/12/2002 DURHAM COMMUNICATIONS INC Accounts Payable Check 840.00
86187 9/12/2002 EL CAMINO VETERINARY HOSP Accounts Payable Check 21.00
86188 9/12/2002 EVERGREEN OIL,INC. Accounts Payable Check 75.00
86189 9/12/2002 FARM SUPPLY COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 103.93
86190 9/12/2002 FERRELL'S AUTO REPAIR Accounts Payable Check 66.00
86191 9/12/2002 FGL ENVIRONMENTAL Accounts Payable Check 652.50
86192 9/12/2002 FIRE MAINTENANCE COMPANY,LLC Accounts Payable Check 90.00
86193 9/12/2002 FOOD FOR LESS Accounts Payable Check 474.00
86194 9/12/2002 FOOTPRINTS Accounts Payable Check 407.57
86195 9/12/2002 G.NEIL DIRECT MAIL,INC. Accounts Payable Check 82.04
86196 9/12/2002 GALL'S INC. Accounts Payable Check 211.24
• 86197 9/12/2002 GAS COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 60.91
I' 86198 9/12/2002 GEM AUTO PARTS Accounts Payable Check 540.35
86199 9/12/2002 GENERAL HOSPITAL Accounts Payable Check 31.00
86200 9/12/2002 GIBBS SECURITY GATES Accounts Payable Check 156.00
86201 9/12/2002 GRISANTI HARDWARE Accounts Payable Check 32.75
86202 9/12/2002 H.V.CARTER CO.,INC. Accounts Payable Check 176.05
86203 9/12/2002 HART IMPRESSIONS PRINT© Accounts Payable Check 474.17
86204 9/12/2002 GENE HICKS Accounts Payable Check 17.00
86205 9/12/2002 HOBSON'S POLYGRAPH SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 175.00
86206 9/12/2002 IDLER'S NORTH COUNTY Accounts Payable Check 182.27
86207 9/12/2002 INFORMATION SERVICES DIVISION Accounts Payable Check 415.52
86208 9/12/2002 INGLIS PET HOTEL Accounts Payable Check 199.47
86209 9/12/2002 J.S.M.ELECTRIC Accounts Payable Check 155.00
86210 9/12/2002 EDWARD P.JARDINI Accounts Payable Check 240.00
86211 9/12/2002 JIFFY LUBE#1932 PCJL,INC. Accounts Payable Check 112.43
86212 9/12/2002 JIM'S CAMPUS CAMERA Accounts Payable Check 42.85
86213 9/12/2002 K-MART Accounts Payable Check 5.14
86214 9/12/2002 KEN'S MOBIL SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 1,068.92
•'', 86215 9/12/2002 KRITZ EXCAVATING&TRUCKING Accounts Payable Check 12.87
UJa
City of Ataseadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of September 2002
Check Check
Number Date Vendor Description AmL!
86216 9/12/2002 L.N.CURTIS&SONS Accounts Payable Check 126.
86217 9/12/2002 LASHER AUTO CENTER Accounts Payable Check 22 606.64
86218 9/12/2002 LCD AUTOMOTIVE Accounts Payable Check 520.00
86219 9/12/2002 LEE WILSON ELECTRIC CO.INC Accounts Payable Check 1,120.00
86220 9/12/2002 LERN Accounts Payable Check 295.00
86221 9/12/2002 TODD LOMELINO,M.D. Accounts Payable Check 137.00
86222 9/12/2002 LONGS DRUG STORES Accounts Payable Check 112.56
86223 9/12/2002 LYNDON'S AUTOMOTIVE Accounts Payable Check 419.05
86224 9/12/2002 STEVE MCHARRIS Accounts Payable Check 65.24
86225 9/12/2002 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO. Accounts Payable Check 91.10
86226 9/12/2002 MICHAEL'S Accounts Payable Check 171.60
86227 9/12/2002 MID-COAST MOWER&SAW Accounts Payable Check 64.55
86228 9/12/2002 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE Accounts Payable Check 32.90
86229 9/12/2002 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 185.66
86230 9/12/2002 MOORE'S WESTERN NURSERY Accounts Payable Check 12.52
86231 9/12/2002 JACOB H.MURCH Accounts Payable Check 125.00
86232 9/12/2002 OMNI-MEANS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 6,889.
86233 9/12/2002 OUTLET TOOL SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 52
86234 9/12/2002 PACIFIC BELL Accounts Payable Check 1,224.41
86235 9/12/2002 PACIFIC BELL/WORLDCOM Accounts Payable Check 1,008.99
86236 9/12/2002 PACIFIC HOME DO IT CENTER Accounts Payable Check 478.46
86237 9/12/2002 PASO ROBLES ELECTRIC,INC. Accounts Payable Check 123.64
86238 9/12/2002 PASO ROBLES TRUCK CENTER Accounts Payable Check 4,155.97
86239 9/12/2002 PASO ROBLES WELDING Accounts Payable Check 29.37
86240 9/12/2002 PENNY MEN Accounts Payable Check 508.90
86241 9/12/2002 PERRY'S PARCEL SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 174.25
86242 9/12/2002 PRO MOTION Accounts Payable Check 321.62
86243 9/12/2002 PRODUCERS DAIRY FOODS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 21.80
86244 9/12/2002 PUBLIC SAFETY CENTER,INC. Accounts Payable Check 370.18
86245 9/12/2002 QUILL CORPORATION Accounts Payable Check 481.45
86246 9/12/2002 RADIO SHACK Accounts Payable Check 327.08
86247 9/12/2002 RAINBOW MEALWORMS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 522.27
86248 9/12/2002 RAINBOW TOWING Accounts Payable Check 35.00
86249 9/12/2002 RAY'S AUTO DETAIL Accounts Payable Check 250.00
86250 9/12/2002 RECOGNITION WORKS Accounts Payable Check 1
86251 9/12/2002 RELIABLE PROTEIN PRODUCTS Accounts Payable Check 1,215.aT
V-qu
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of September 2002
Check Check
umber Date Vendor Description Amount
86252 9/12/2002 ROHRER HAY&FEED SALES Accounts Payable Check 95.00
86253 9/12/2002 RXLASER Accounts Payable Check 268.13
86254 9/12/2002 S.D.FRANKLIN ELECTRIC,INC. Accounts Payable Check 261.00
86255 9/12/2002 SAN JOAQUIN SUPPLY COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 3,502.79
86256 9/12/2002 SAN LUIS PAPER Accounts Payable Check 167.61
86257 9/12/2002 SANTA MARIA TIRE,INC Accounts Payable Check 700.25
86258 9/12/2002 SAWYER INC. Accounts Payable Check 18 656.00
86259 9/12/2002 SHELL OIL COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 70.66
86260 9/12/2002 SIERRA VISTA REGIONAL MEDICAL Accounts Payable Check 33.50
86261 9/12/2002 SIGN OUTLET Accounts Payable Check 481.17
86262 9/12/2002 JULIE SMALLWOOD Accounts Payable Check 35.00
86263 9/12/2002 JENNIFER SMALLWOOD Accounts Payable Check 35.00
86264 9/12/2002 SMART AND FINAL Accounts Payable Check 181.09
86265 9/12/2002 ROLAND SNOW Accounts Payable Check 48.13
86266 9/12/2002 SAFETY EQUIPMENT SOLON FIRE CONTROL FIRE& Accounts Payable Check 702.48
86267 9/12/2002 SOLUTIONS 4 SURE.COM,INC. Accounts Payable Check 1,999.21
86268 9/12/2002 STAPLES INC. Accounts Payable Check 167.66
86269 9/12/2002 STERLING COMMUNICATIONS Accounts Payable Check 208.68
86270 9/12/2002 TCGSC CDN SERVICE UNIT Accounts Payable Check 85.00
86271 9/12/2002 TOM FLYNN&SONS Accounts Payable Check 1,462.50
86272 9/12/2002 TWIN CITIES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL Accounts Payable Check 20.00
86273 9/12/2002 GREGORY UGARTE D.V.M. Accounts Payable Check 100.00
86274 9/12/2002 UNISOURCE MAINT SUPPLY SYSTEMS Accounts Payable Check 220.64
86275 9/12/2002 UNITED GREEN MARK,INC. Accounts Payable Check 513.61
86276 9/12/2002 JEFF VAN DEN EIKHOF Accounts Payable Check 30.00
86277 9/12/2002 VANG COMP SYSTEMS Accounts Payable Check 580.00
86278 9/12/2002 JAY VONBARGEN Accounts Payable Check 265.50
86279 9/12/2002 WESTERN FARM SERVICE,INC. Accounts Payable Check 748.67
86280 9/12/2002 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES,INC. Accounts Payable Check 1,199.70
86121 9/13/2002 ATASCADERO FIRE DEPT EMP.ASSN Payroll Vendor Payment 240.00
86122 9/13/2002 ATASCADERO MID MGRS ORG UNION Payroll Vendor Payment 30.00
86123 9/13/2002 ATASCADERO POLICE OFFICERS ASN Payroll Vendor Payment 376.00
86124 9/13/2002 COUNTY-CITY EMPLOYEES CU Payroll Vendor Payment 625.00
86125 9/13/2002 EMPLOYMENT DEV DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 7,155.78
86126 9/13/2002 EMPLOYMENT DEV.DEPARTMENT Accounts Payable Check 5,351.00
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of September 2002
Check Check -
Number Date Vendor Description untift
86127 9/13/2002 EMPLOYMENT DEV.DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 684.
86128 9/13/2002 FAMILY SUPPORT DIVISION Payroll Vendor Payment 369.23
86129 9/13/2002 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE Payroll Vendor Payment 6,282.99
86130 9/13/2002 VOID Payroll Vendor Payment 0.00
86131 9/13/2002 KENNEDY CLUB FITNESS Payroll Vendor Payment 79.50
86132 9/13/2002 PERS LONG TERM CARE PROGRAM Payroll Vendor Payment 32.31
86133 9/13/2002 PUBLIC EMPL RETIREMENT SYSTEM Payroll Vendor Payment 19,377.17
86134 9/13/2002 SEIU LOCAL 620 AFL-CIO Payroll Vendor Payment 535.14
86135 9/13/2002 UNITED WAY OF SLO COUNTY Payroll Vendor Payment 38.00
86136 9/13/2002 WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK Payroll Vendor Payment 984.79
86281 9/13/2002 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 Accounts Payable Check 650.00
165 9/17/2002 MID-STATE BANK Payroll Vendor Payment 32,630.75
86282 9/20/2002 VOID Accounts Payable Check 0.00
86283 9/20/2002 AHSHE DAY SPA&SALON Accounts Payable Check 75.00
86284 9/20/2002 ALBERTSONS Accounts Payable Check 179.72
86285 9/20/2002 JOE ALLEN Accounts Payable Check 315.0
86286 9/20/2002 AMERICAN WEST TIRE&AUTO INC Accounts Payable Check 1
86287 9/20/2002 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 121.40
86288 9/20/2002 ARLYNE'S FLOWERS&ETC. Accounts Payable Check 75.00
86289 9/20/2002 ELIZABETH BALL Accounts Payable Check 75.00
86290 9/20/2002 BOB KEULEN CONSTRUCTION Accounts Payable Check 6,405.00
86291 9/20/2002 CALIFORNIA EMS AUTHORITY Accounts Payable Check 130.00
86292 9/20/2002 CASSIE'S CUSTOM CAKES Accounts Payable Check 75.00
86293 9/20/2002 CELLULARONE Accounts Payable Check 1,186.49
86294 9/20/2002 CENTRAL COAST SEA FOOD Accounts Payable Check 297.00
86295 9/20/2002 ANDREA CHANDOS Accounts Payable Check 75.00
86296 9/20/2002 CHEM CLEAN Accounts Payable Check 54.97
86297 9/20/2002 CHEVRON Accounts Payable Check 783.26
86298 9/20/2002 LINDA CHRISTIE Accounts Payable Check 36.00
86299 9/20/2002 CJP PRODUCTIONS Accounts Payable Check 1,500.00
86300 9/20/2002 COBARR PHOTOGRAPHY Accounts Payable Check 75.00
86301 9/20/2002 COLLEGIATE CONCEPTS Accounts Payable Check 400.00
86302 9/20/2002 VINCE CONDE Accounts Payable Check 90.00
86303 9/20/2002 COPWARE Accounts Payable Check 610
86304 9/20/2002 CIMON CORMIER Accounts Payable Check 30.
City of Ataseadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of September 2002
Check Check
Ald&lmh Date Vendor Description Amount
86305 9/20/2002 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER Accounts Payable Check 22.75
86306 9/20/2002 CUESTA COLLEGE Accounts Payable Check 96.12
86309 9/20/2002 DANCRIS TELECOM Accounts Payable Check 375.41
86310 9/20/2002 SANDRA N.DEAL PH.D. Accounts Payable Check 290.00
86311 9/20/2002 JIM DEBRAUWERE Accounts Payable Check 75.00
86312 9/20/2002 DECOU LUMBER COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 76.99
86313 9/20/2002 DEBBIE DEIS Accounts Payable Check 75.00
86314 9/20/2002 DIGITAL WEST VIDEO Accounts Payable Check 75.00
86315 9/20/2002 DMV Accounts Payable Check 363.00
86316 9/20/2002 EL CAMINO CAR WASH LLC Accounts Payable Check 131.85
86317 9/20/2002 ESCUELA DEL RIO Accounts Payable Check 55.00
86318 9/20/2002 TONY FARAO Accounts Payable Check 75.00
86319 9/20/2002 FERRELL'S AUTO REPAIR Accounts Payable Check 12.00
86320 9/20/2002 FIRE OUT UNIFORM COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 249.65
86321 9/20/2002 CHARLOTTE FONTECCHIO Accounts Payable Check 15.00
86322 9/20/2002 FOOD FOR LESS Accounts Payable Check 136.95
86323 9/20/2002 ANDREW FRUIN Accounts Payable Check 122.24
86324 9/20/2002 GAS COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 93.67
86325 9/20/2002 GEM AUTO PARTS Accounts Payable Check 568.29
86326 9/20/2002 MATTHEW A.GIANAS Accounts Payable Check 60.00
86327 9/20/2002 GRISANTI HARDWARE Accounts Payable Check 182.76
86328 9/20/2002 LAIRD HAIL Accounts Payable Check 175.00
86329 9/20/2002 HART IMPRESSIONS PRINT© Accounts Payable Check 41.47
86330 9/20/2002 LUCY HARTZELL Accounts Payable Check 35.00
86331 9/20/2002 REGIONALD HICKS Accounts Payable Check 50.00
86332 9/20/2002 MARLA HILL Accounts Payable Check 75.00
86333 9/20/2002 HOBBY SHOP Accounts Payable Check 622.27
86334 9/20/2002 IAR,INC. Accounts Payable Check 62.88
86335 9/20/2002 IMAGEWEST PHOTOGRAPHY Accounts Payable Check 75.00
86336 9/20/2002 EVELYN INGRAM Accounts Payable Check 352.80
86337 9/20/2002 JAVITZ VIDEOGRAPHY Accounts Payable Check 75.00
86338 9/20/2002 JESPERSEN'S TIRE SERVICE,INC. Accounts Payable Check 25.00
86339 9/20/2002 JIFFY LUBE#1932 PCJL,INC. Accounts Payable Check 84.13
86340 9/20/2002 CHUCK KENDRICK Accounts Payable Check 102.00
86341 9/20/2002 KATE KREMKE Accounts Payable Check 20.00
86342 9/20/2002 LEONARD J.LA CASTO Accounts Payable Check 102.00
U43
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of September 2002
Check Check
Number Date Vendor Description Amours
le
86343 9/20/2002 LAIDLAW TRANSIT SERVICES,INC. Accounts Payable Check 13 939.
86344 9/20/2002 VOID Accounts Payable Check 0.00
86345 9/20/2002 LEE WAYNE CORPORATION Accounts Payable Check 64.00
86346 9/20/2002 LEE WILSON ELECTRIC CO.INC Accounts Payable Check 49 950.00
86347 9/20/2002 LIFE ASSIST,INC. Accounts Payable Check 104.94
86348 9/20/2002 LILIES OF THE FIELD Accounts Payable Check 75.00
86349 9/20/2002 KELLY LINDSAY Accounts Payable Check 75.00
86350 9/20/2002 MARIN CONSULTING ASSC Accounts Payable Check 235.00
86351 9/20/2002 JOHN MARTINO Accounts Payable Check 62.00
86352 9/20/2002 BECKY MAXWELL Accounts Payable Check 81.21
86353 9/20/2002 RICHARD J.MCCOY Accounts Payable Check 178.00
86354 9/20/2002 MID-COAST MOWER&SAW Accounts Payable Check 5.08
86355 9/20/2002 PAUL MILLER Accounts Payable Check 51.00
86356 9/20/2002 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE Accounts Payable Check 206.34
86357 9/20/2002 KARLA MURRAY Accounts Payable Check 75.00
86358 9/20/2002 SONYA NAVARRETTE Accounts Payable Check 75.00
86359 9/20/2002 NICKSON'S MACHINE SHOP INC. Accounts Payable Check 3,828.7
86360 9/20/2002 NORTHWEST BUSINESS STAMP Accounts Payable Check 814,
86361 9/20/2002 NRPA PACIFIC SERVICE CENTER Accounts Payable Check 1,050.00
86362 9/20/2002 OMNI-MEANS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 956.00
86363 9/20/2002 OUTLET TOOL SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 3,088.61
86364 9/20/2002 PACIFIC BELL/WORLDCOM Accounts Payable Check 399.53
86366 9/20/2002 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC Accounts Payable Check 38,818.65
86367 9/20/2002 PACIFIC HOME DO IT CENTER Accounts Payable Check 16.18
86368 9/20/2002 DAVID PASCOLLA Accounts Payable Check 75.00
86369 9/20/2002 PASO ROBLES INN Accounts Payable Check 75.00
86370 9/20/2002 PERRY'S PARCEL SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 45.90
86371 9/20/2002 FINANCE DEPARTMENT PETTY CASH Accounts Payable Check 350.36
86372 9/20/2002 PICTURE MAGIC Accounts Payable Check 75.00
86373 9/20/2002 PIERCE MANUFACTURING,INC. Accounts Payable Check 215.26
86374 9/20/2002 PLATINUM PLUS FOR BUSINESS 1280 Accounts Payable Check 40.80
86375 9/20/2002 PLATINUM PLUS FOR BUSINESS 1298 Accounts Payable Check 2,274.75
86376 9/20/2002 PLATINUM PLUS FOR BUSINESS 1306 Accounts Payable Check 604.76
86377 9/20/2002 PLATINUM PLUS FOR BUSINESS 1314 Accounts Payable Check 31.32
86378 9/20/2002 PLATINUM PLUS FOR BUSINESS 1330 Accounts Payable Check 270
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of September 2002
Check Check
Aftimber Date Vendor Description Amount
86379 9/20/2002 PLATINUM PLUS FOR BUSINESS 1348 Accounts Payable Check 1,487.84
86380 9/20/2002 PLATINUM PLUS FOR BUSINESS 1355 Accounts Payable Check 1,115.91
86381 9/20/2002 PLATINUM PLUS FOR BUSINESS 1363 Accounts Payable Check 66.29
86382 9/20/2002 PLATINUM PLUS FOR BUSINESS 1371 Accounts Payable Check 726.46
86383 9/20/2002 PLATINUM PLUS FOR BUSINESS 1389 Accounts Payable Check 145.00
86384 9/20/2002 POWER CONVERSION PRODUCTS,LLC Accounts Payable Check 375.16
86385 9/20/2002 PRODUCERS DAIRY FOODS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 36.80
86386 9/20/2002 GRACE L.PUCCI Accounts Payable Check 165.00
86387 9/20/2002 QUILL CORPORATION Accounts Payable Check 49.32
86388 9/20/2002 RADIO SHACK Accounts Payable Check 53.61
86389 9/20/2002 RAINBOW TOWING Accounts Payable Check 20.00
86390 9/20/2002 RECOGNITION WORKS Accounts Payable Check 54.70
86391 9/20/2002 RICK BUTLER BUSINESS MACHINES Accounts Payable Check 163.98
86392 9/20/2002 STEVE ROMO Accounts Payable Check 81.00
86393 9/20/2002 SAN LUIS OBISPO REGIONAL Accounts Payable Check 1,500.00
86394 9/20/2002 SAN LUIS PERSONNEL INC. Accounts Payable Check 400.80
86395 9/20/2002 SCMAF Accounts.Payable Check 50.00
• 86396 9/20/2002 TOM SILVA Accounts Payable Check 76.00
86397 9/20/2002 SLIGH CABINETS,INC Accounts Payable Check 525.00
86398 9/20/2002 SMART AND FINAL Accounts Payable Check 61.71
86399 9/20/2002 ROLAND SNOW Accounts Payable Check 77.73
86400 9/20/2002 STAPLES INC. Accounts Payable Check 102.46
86401 9/20/2002 STATE OF CALIFORNIA Accounts Payable Check 30.00
86402 9/20/2002 KURT W.STONE Accounts Payable Check 80.00
86403 9/20/2002 STUDIO WEST VIDEO Accounts Payable Check 75.00
86404 9/20/2002 SUNLIGHT JANITORIAL Accounts Payable Check 1,100.00
86405 9/20/2002 SUPERIOR QUALITY COPIERS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 691.47
86406 9/20/2002 T-N-T PEST CONTROL Accounts Payable Check 88.00
86407 9/20/2002 T.A.P.S.TRUCK ACCESSORY OUTLT Accounts Payable Check 1,646.63
86408 9/20/2002 TAYLOR RENTAL Accounts Payable Check 75.00
86409 9/20/2002 TAYLOR RENTAL CENTER Accounts Payable Check 56.24
86410 9/20/2002 TED MILES JEEP Accounts Payable Check 64.78
86411 9/20/2002 TEMPLETON UNIFORMS Accounts Payable Check 76.14
86412 9/20/2002 THAT FINAL TOUCH Accounts Payable Check 75.00
• 86413 9/20/2002 JILL THIERCOF Accounts Payable Check 88.16
86414 9/20/2002 TODD PIPE&SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 402.19
T
U q5-
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of September 2002
Check Check
Number Date Vendor Description Amount
86415 9/20/2002 TRIBUNE Accounts Payable Check 1,026.
86416 9/20/2002 TWIN CITIES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL Accounts Payable Check 40.00
86417 9/20/2002 UCD VET MED TEACHING HOSPITAL Accounts Payable Check 300.00
86418 9/20/2002 UNION ASPHALT,INC. Accounts Payable Check 580.75
86419 9/20/2002 UNITED GREEN MARK,INC. Accounts Payable Check 475.02
86420 9/20/2002 TOM VELASQUEZ Accounts Payable Check 81.00
86421 9/20/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS Accounts Payable Check 43.70
86422 9/20/2002 VIDEO PALACE Accounts Payable Check 9.75
86423 9/20/2002 VINTAGE CATERING&CAFE Accounts Payable Check 60.00
86424 9/20/2002 VONS Accounts Payable Check 64.89
86425 9/20/2002 W.W.GRAINGER,INC. Accounts Payable Check 335.79
86426 9/20/2002 WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION Accounts Payable Check 112.00
86427 9/20/2002 DEANA WATSON Accounts Payable Check 102.00
86428 9/20/2002 WESTATES TRUCK EQUIPMENT CORP Accounts Payable Check 97.42
86429 9/20/2002 WESTERN JANITOR SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 544.92
86430 9/20/2002 DONNA WILLIAMS Accounts Payable Check 20.00
86431 9/20/2002 WONDRIES FLEET GROUP Accounts Payable Check 49,121.9
86432 9/20/2002 CALIFORNIA CODE CHECK Accounts Payable Check 8,27g�
86433 9/20/2002 CALIFORNIA CODE CHECK Accounts Payable Check 1,737.81
86434 9/20/2002 CJP PRODUCTIONS Accounts Payable Check 790.00
166 9/26/2002 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE Accounts Payable Check 545,021.26
167 9/26/2002 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE Accounts Payable Check 175,061.52
86435 9/26/2002 DALE A.BYWATER Accounts Payable Check 5,107.50
86436 9/26/2002 CALIFORNIA INTERNET CONNECTION Accounts Payable Check 2,329.92
86437 9/27/2002 ATASCADERO FIRE DEPT EMP.ASSN Payroll Vendor Payment 240.00
86438 9/27/2002 ATASCADERO MID MGRS ORG UNION Payroll Vendor Payment 30.00
86439 9/27/2002 ATASCADERO POLICE OFFICERS ASN Payroll Vendor Payment 376.00
86440 9/27/2002 COUNTY-CITY EMPLOYEES CU Payroll Vendor Payment 625.00
86441 9/27/2002 EMPLOYMENT DEV DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 7,026.47
86442 9/27/2002 EMPLOYMENT DEV.DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 669.82
86443 9/27/2002 FAMILY SUPPORT DIVISION Payroll Vendor Payment 369.23
86444 9/27/2002 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE Payroll Vendor Payment 6,282.99
86445 9/27/2002 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 Payroll Vendor Payment 650.00
86446 9/27/2002 KENNEDY CLUB FITNESS Payroll Vendor Payment 70
86447 9/27/2002 PERS LONG TERM CARE PROGRAM Payroll Vendor Payment 32.
City of Ataseadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of September 2002
Check Check
Amkumber Date Vendor Description Amount
86448 9/27/2002 PUBLIC EMPL RETIREMENT SYSTEM Payroll Vendor Payment 19,488.89
86449 9/27/2002 SEIU LOCAL 620 AFL-CIO Payroll Vendor Payment 528.04
86450 9/27/2002 UNITED WAY OF SLO COUNTY Payroll Vendor Payment 38.00
86451 9/27/2002 WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK Payroll Vendor Payment 989.75
168 9/30/2002 MID-STATE BANK Accounts Payable Check 140.00
169 9/30/2002 MID-STATE BANK Accounts Payable Check 75.00
170 9/30/2002 MID-STATE BANK Accounts Payable Check 36.00
171 9/30/2002 MID-STATE BANK Accounts Payable Check 55.00
172 9/30/2002 MID-STATE BANK Accounts Payable Check 45.00
173 9/30/2002 MID-STATE BANK Accounts Payable Check 26.40
174 9/30/2002 MID-STATE BANK Accounts Payable Check 33.00
$ 1,366,437.02
b47
ITEM NUMBER: A-4
DATE: 11/12/2002
minim i ■
• iaia i e
Atascadero City Council
Staff Report- City Manager
City Council Reimbursement
RECOMMENDATION:
Council adopt draft Resolution setting forth meeting and professional development allowances
for City Council Members.
DISCUSSION:
The City Council directed staff to prepare a Resolution establishing a seventy-five dollar
• ($75.00) monthly stipend to offset a portion of the cost of Council Members attending meetings
or professional development. Council Members typically travel to several meetings a month to
represent the City and stay current on issues affecting the community. Other communities such
as Arroyo Grande and Pismo Beach provide a$75.00 allowance each month to Council Members
for this purpose. Actual expenses will exceed the $75.00 and Council Members can still file
reimbursement claims to capture the entire expense.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The $75.00 per month allowance would result in an annual expense of $4,500.
ATTACHMENT: Draft Resolution
•
048
ITEM NUMBER: A-4
DATE: 11/12/2002
DRAFT RESOLUTION
•
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ATASCADERO SETTING FORTH A MONTHLY MEETING AND
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT ALLOWANCE FOR CITY COUNCIL
MEMBERS
WHEREAS, Council Members are called on to represent the City of Atascadero as Board
Members or appointees on Countywide Agencies and Organizations; and
WHEREAS, Council Members are called on to represent the City before governmental,
non-profit and private entities; and
WHEREAS, Council Members are called on to participate in a variety of community
events to engage the citizens in the business of government; and
WHEREAS, Council Members participate in professional development activities to stay
fully informed and current on issues facing Atascadero; and
WHEREAS, the participation in these events by Council Members represents a significant
personal cost in time and out-of-pocket expense to fulfill the duties of Council Member; and
WHEREAS, the mileage and meal cost to each Council Member is more than $75.00 •
each month;
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Atascadero does hereby resolve as
follows:
Each Council Member shall receive a monthly allowance of$75.00 to offset a portion of
the expenses of attending meetings and professional development opportunities.
On Motion by and seconded by the foregoing
Resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
•
64i
ITEM NUMBER: A-4
DATE: 11/12/2002
•
ADOPTED: CITY OF ATASCADERO
J. MICHAEL ARRAMBIDE, MAYOR
ATTEST:
MARCIA MCCLURE TORGERSON, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
• ROY A. HANLEY, City Attorney
•
5u
ITEM NUMBER: A-5
DATE: 11/12/2002
�-i i91a"���;� �!:•
CAD
Atascadero City Council
Staff Report - Community Development Department
Zone Change 2002-0028 / Conditional Use Permit 2002-0065
Tentative Tract Map 2002-0016 (Tract 2489),
1625 / 1683 / 1685 El Camino Real
(Kelly Gearhart/Wilson Land Surveys)
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Council:
1. Adopt on second reading by title only draft Ordinance A for the creation of a new PD-17
• overlay district; and,
2. Adopt on second reading by title only draft Ordinance B enacting Zone Change 2002-
0028 rezoning the project site to RSF-X / PD-17 subject to a Master Plan of
Development; and,
3. Review and approve the proposed Master Plan of Development and Tentative Map
condition reserving certain units for sale to residents or people employed within the City
of Atascadero.
REPORT-IN-BRIEF:
The proposed project consists of a Planned Development Zone Change with a Master Plan of
Development and Tentative Tract Map to allow a 38-unit single-family residential
subdivision with a maximum density of 4 units/acre. The subdivision will consist of a total
of 40 lots, two of which will be used for an open space feature/ stormwater detention basin.
The site is flat with two rural residential houses surrounded by pastures with eight native oak
trees. The site is located along El Camino Real (arterial street) that will provide project
access. Public water and sewer are available to the site, and will serve the project. The
project is consistent with the General Plan Land Use designation and requires a Planned
Development Overlay to allow density up to 4 du's/ac and lot sizes smaller than 1/2 acre.
• General Plan Designation: SFR-X (Single Family Residential 1/2 acre [4 dwellings/ac max])
Zoning District: RSF-X(Residential Single Family 1/2 acre)
DISCUSSION:
On October 22, 2002, the City Council conducted a public hearing to consider the above-
described project. The project includes two zoning changes, one to the zoning code text and
one to the City Zoning Map. Both items were introduced for first reading and must now be
approved at a second reading.
There were no changes made by the City Council to the Ordinance during its first reading
and it is ready for final adoption as attached.
The Council also directed staff to create a condition of approval for the Master Plan and
Tentative Map that would reserve 19 of the units for sale to people who either live or work in
Atascadero. Staff is proposing the following condition:
1. The project shall include two (2) deed restricted moderate-income affordable units. Deed
restrictions shall be recorded at time of final map and have a 10-year time limit.
2. Prior to recordation of final map, the applicant shall enter into a legal agreement with the City
to reserve 19 of the units for sale to residents or workers within the City of Atascadero. Two
of the 19 units shall be the deed restricted affordable units. The agreement shall include the
following provisions:
a The units shall be offered for sale to residents or workers within •
e t the City of Atascadero for
a minimum of 60-days. During this time period offers may only be accepted from
Atascadero residents or workers.
b) The applicant shall provide reasonable proof to the City that at least one of the qualified
buyers is a resident or worker within the City Limits of Atascadero.
c) The Atascadero resident or worker restriction shall apply to the initial sale only.
d) The applicant shall identify which units will be reserved.
e) The City Attorney shall approve the final form of the agreement.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The project would likely have a slight negative impact on City revenues. As a general rule,
single-family dwellings require services that exceed the revenue generated by the dwelling.
•
ITEM NUMBER: A-5
DATE: 11/12/2002
ATTACHMENT 1: Draft Ordinance A ,
DRAFT
ORDINANCE A
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO
AMENDING THE ZONING CODE TO CREATE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
OVERLAY DISTRICT 17 FOR USE IN THE RSF-X ZONING DISTRICT
(1625 / 1683 / 1685 El Camino Real,APN 049-102-008, 009 /Gearhart)
WHEREAS, an application has been received from Kelly Gearhart, 6205 Alcantara
Avenue, Atascadero, CA 93422, (Applicant & Owner), to consider a project consisting of a
zone change from RSF-X (Residential Single Family 1/2 acre) to RSF-X / PD-17
(Residential Single Family with Planned Development Overlay #17) with the adoption of a
Master Plan of Development, and an 40-lot residential tract map, on a 9.90 acre lot located at •
1625 / 1683 / 1685 El Camino Real(APN 049-102-008, 009); and,
WHEREAS, an Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration 2002-0035
were prepared for the project and made available for public review in accordance with the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and,
WHEREAS, the site's General Plan Designation is SFR-X (Single Family
Residential 1/2 acre [4 dwellings/ac max]); and,
WHEREAS, the site's current zoning district is RSF-X (Residential Single Family
1/2 acre); and,
WHEREAS, General Plan Policy HOS 1.1.4. allows for the creation of single family.
planned development projects with a maximum density of 4 unit per acre in the SFR-X land
use; and,
WHEREAS,the Planning Commission has determined that it is in the best interest of
the City to enact this amendment to the Zoning Map to protect the health, safety and welfare
of its citizens by applying orderly development and expanding housing opportunities within
the City; and,
WHEREAS, the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and public notice of •
environmental documents, as set forth in the State and local guidelines for implementation of
the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) have been adhered to; and,
6;54
Draft Ordinance A
November 12,2002
Page 2 of 5
• WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed Public Hearing upon the subject Zone
Change application was held by the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero at which
hearing evidence, oral and documentary, was admitted on behalf of said zoning amendments;
and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, at a Public Hearing
held on October 1, 2002, studied and considered Zone Change 2002-0028, after first studying
and considering the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project and
recommended approval, and,
WHEREAS, the Atascadero City Council, at a Public Hearing held on October 22,
2002, studied and considered Zone Change 2002-0028, after first studying and considering
the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project, and,
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council takes the following actions:
SECTION 1. Findings for Approval of a Zone Change Creating a PD-17
Planned Development Overlay District. The City Council finds as follows:
1. Modification of development standards or processing requirements is warranted
• to promote orderly and harmonious development.
2. Modification of development standards or processing requirements will enhance
the opportunity to best utilize special characteristics of an area and will have a
beneficial effect on the area.
3. Benefits derived from the overlay zone cannot be reasonably achieved through
existing development standards or processing requirements.
SECTION 2. Approval. The Atascadero City Council, in a regular session
assembled on October 22, 2002 resolved to introduce for first reading an ordinance that
would amend the City Zoning ordinance with the following:
9-3.662 Establishment of Planned Development Overlay Zone No. 17:
(PD17).
A Planned Development Overlay Zone No. 17 may be established in the
RSF-X single-family residential zones on lots with a net acreage exceeding
one acre. The maximum density within the planned development shall not
exceed a gross density of 4.0 units per acre. The following development
standards shall be applied to all projects within Planned Development Zone
No. 17:
• (a) A Master Plan of Development of the site shall be approved. All
construction and development shall be done in conformance with the
approved Master Plan of Development.
Z-)
U�5
Draft Ordinance A
November 12,2002
Page 3 of 5
(b) No subsequent tentative parcel or tract map shall be approved unless •
found to be consistent with the approved Master Plan of Development.
(c) A proposed planned development project shall consist of no fewer than
four (4) residential units.
(d) A parent lot or lots shall have frontage on a public street.
(e) Each dwelling unit shall be subject to review under the City's Appearance
Review Guidelines.
(f) Building setbacks shall be as follows:
Front yard at 15 feet
porch
---....................._... ...............................
..........................._._........
E
nt yard at 20 feet
lling
Front yard at 25 feet
garage
771
Side yards _]5 feet _.._._..__.._....
Side yard 12 feet
(corner lot)
}
Rear yard 10 feet •
Accessory 5 feet
structure side
and rear yards
Garages shall be recessed from the front of the residence by at least ten (10)
feet.
(1) Physically Unique Sites. Sites with one (1) or more mature trees, steep
slopes, riparian areas and/or some other unique physical characteristic are
not subject to the above setback requirements provided the following findings
are made: (i) that flexibility from the above setback standards is necessary to
enable the environmentally superior design alternative; (ii) that at least fifty
percent (50%) of each individual lot will be landscaped; and (iii) that at least
sixty percent (60%) of the net area of the overall site will be landscaped.
(g) Building coverage (residence plus garage footprint) shall not exceed thirty-
five percent (35%) of the individual lot area. Landscaping shall constitute a
minimum of forty percent (40%) of the lot area. The measurement of
landscaped areas shall be exclusive of driveways, patios, decks, etc.
(h) Two-story residences shall have a second floor that is limited to seventy-
five percent (75%) of the gross area of the first floor inclusive of the garage. •
G-:-6
Draft Ordinance A
November 12,2002
Page 4 of 5
• (i) All mechanical equipment, including HVAC units and utility meters, shall be
screened from view from adjacent streets and properties.
(j) Exterior fencing shall be consistent throughout the project. Design and
appearance of fences and/or walls shall be compatible with the design of the
dwelling units.
(k) Accessory buildings (sheds, etc.) will be allowed; however, the footprint of
such accessory buildings will count toward the maximum percent of allowable
building coverage.
(1) Each proposed lot shall have a minimum frontage of sixty (60) feet
measured at the 25-foot setback line. The minimum net lot area shall be
6,400 square feet.
(m) Parking for two-resident vehicles shall be provided in a garage with
minimum interior dimensions of twenty (20) feet by twenty (20) feet. One
guest parking space of at least nine (9) feet by eighteen (18) feet shall be
provided on each individual lot. The driveway area may be used to satisfy the
guest parking requirement. On-street parking shall not be used to satisfy the
parking requirements.
(n) All front yards and street facing side yards shall be landscaped.
(o) Individual trash collection shall be used for each residential unit.
• Provisions shall be made for storage of trashcans within the garage or fenced
area.
(p) All utilities, including electric, telephone and cable, along the frontage of
and within the PD shall be installed underground.
(q) Alterations or additions to established dwelling units shall be subject to the
density standards of the underlying zone and shall be reviewed pursuant to
the City's Appearance Review Guidelines.
(r) No farm animals may be kept on a lot.
SECTION 3. Effective Date.
This ordinance shall be effective at 12:01 a.m. on the 31" day after its final passage.
•
u,57
Draft Ordinance A
November 12,2002
Page 5 of 5
On motion by Council Member , and seconded by Council Member •
the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ADOPTED:
By:
Mike Arrambide, Mayor
Attest:
Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk
Approved as to form:
Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney
•
Nj Z
ATTACHMENT 2: Draft Ordinance B
•
DRAFT
ORDINANCE B
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO APPROVING
ZONE CHANGE 2002-0028 THEREBY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP DISTRICT
OF APN 049-102-008, 009 RSF-X (RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY 1/2 ACRE) TO
RSF-X/PD-17 (RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY WITH PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY#17) SUBJECT TO A MASTER PLAN OF
DEVELOPMENT.
(1625 / 1683 / 1685 El Camino Real, APN 049-102-008, 009/Gearhart)
WHEREAS, an application has been received from Kelly Gearhart, 6205 Alcantara
Avenue, Atascadero, CA 93422, (Applicant & Owner), to consider a project consisting of a
zone change from RSF-X (Residential Single Family 1/2 acre) to RSF-X / PD-17
(Residential Single Family with Planned Development Overlay #17) with the adoption of a
Master Plan of Development, and an 40-lot residential tract map, on a 9.90 acre lot located at
• 1625 / 1683 / 1685 El Camino Real (APN 049-102-008,009); and,
WHEREAS, an Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration 2002-0035
were prepared for the project and made available for public review in accordance with the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA); and,
WHEREAS, the site's General Plan Designation is SFR-X (Single Family
Residential 1/2 acre [4 dwellings/ac max]); and,
WHEREAS,the site's current zoning district is RSF-X (Residential Single Family
1/2 acre); and,
WHEREAS, General Plan Policy. HOS 1.1.4.a allows for the creation of single
family planned development projects with a maximum density of 4 unit per acre in the SFR-
X land use; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that it is in the best interest of
the City to enact this amendment to the Zoning Map to protect the health, safety and welfare
of its citizens by applying orderly development and expanding housing opportunities within
the City; and,
WHEREAS, the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and public notice of
• environmental documents, as set forth in the State and local guidelines for implementation of
the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)have been adhered to; and,
Draft Ordinance B
November 12,2002
Page 2 of 5
WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed Public Hearing upon the subject Zone •
Change application was held by the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero at which
hearing evidence, oral and documentary, was admitted on behalf of said zoning amendments;
and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, at a Public Hearing
held on October 1, 2002, studied and considered Zone Change 2002-0028, after first studying
and considering the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project and
thereby recommended approval, and,
WHEREAS, the Atascadero City Council, at a Public Hearing held on October 22,
2002, studied and considered Zone Change 2002-0028, after first studying and considering
the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project and the Planning
Commission's Recommendation, and,
NOW, THEREFORE,the City Council takes the following actions:
SECTION 1. Findings for Approval of a Zone Change Creatine a PD-17
Planned Development Overlay District. The City Council finds as follows:
1. Modification of development standards or processing requirements is warranted
to promote orderly and harmonious development.
2. Modification of development standards or processing requirements will enhance •
the opportunity to best utilize special characteristics of an area and will have a
beneficial effect on the area.
3. Benefits derived from the overlay zone cannot be reasonably achieved through
existing development standards or processing requirements.
4. Proposed plans offer certain redeeming features to compensate for the requested
modification including a 1/2-acre passive park.
SECTION 2. Approval. The Atascadero City Council, in a regular session
assembled on October 22, 2002 resolved to introduce for first reading an ordinance that
would rezone the subject site consistent with the following:
1. Exhibit A: Zone Change Map
•
Draft Ordinance B
November 12,2002
Page 3 of 5
• SECTION 3. Effective Date.
This ordinance shall be effective at 12:01 a.m. on the 31 day after its final passage.
On motion by Council Member , and seconded by Council Member
the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ADOPTED:
By:
Mike Arrambide, Mayor
• Attest:
Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk
Approved as to form:
Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney
•
Exhlbit A: Zone Change Map
ZCH 2002-0028 •
Existing Zoning: RSF-X
Proposed Zoning: RSF-X/PD-17-1
1625 1 1683 1 1685 EI Camino Real
APH 049-102-008,009
TO
S
ff � � f-
v. F - \ - f \
i
gg
y 6 Eg .�
24
MIMI
AM
t �
i
f � �
y c
C
d
f _ 3
ry
3 �
,, 77
1
•
Ui�Iii
• ATTACHMENT 3: Draft Affordable and Reserved Housing Condition
Staff is proposing the following condition based on the City Council's motion. The
conditions would be added to the resolutions for the Master Plan of Development and
Tentative Map.
1. The project shall include two (2) deed restricted moderate-income affordable units. Deed
restrictions shall be recorded at time of final map and have a 10-year time limit.
2. Prior to recordation of final map, the applicant shall enter into a legal agreement with the City
to reserve 19 of the units for sale to residents or workers within the City of Atascadero. Two
of the 19 units shall be the deed restricted affordable units. The agreement shall include the
following provisions:
a) The units shall be offered for sale to residents or workers within the City of Atascadero for
a minimum of 60-days. During this time period offers may only be accepted from
Atascadero residents or workers.
b) The applicant shall provide reasonable proof to the City that at least one of the qualified
• buyers is a resident or worker within the City Limits of Atascadero.
c) The Atascadero resident or worker restriction shall apply to the initial sale only.
d) The applicant shall identify which units will be reserved.
e) The City Attorney shall approve the final form of the agreement.
•
ITEM NUMBER: A-6
M
DATE: 11/12/2002
Tf
Atascadero City Council
Staff Report—Public Works Department
Final Tract Map 2001-0012 (Tract Map 2396)
[TTM 2001-0001]
6250 San Gabriel Road
(Rancho de Paraiso, LLC)
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Council:
1. Accept Final Tract Map 2001-0012(Tract Map 2396).
2. Reject without prejudice to future acceptance, the dedication of all streets and easements
delineated as offers of dedication for street purposes, public utility, slope, drainage, and
• emergency access easements.
3. Authorize City Manager to execute Subdivision Improvement Agreement.
DISCUSSION:
The City Council approved Tentative Tract Map 2001-0001 on June 26, 2001, thereby allowing a
17-lot residential subdivision of 69.39 acres, ranging in size from 3.25 to 6.39 acres, at 6250 San
Gabriel Road.
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 66440 the approving legislative body (City
Council) cannot deny a final map that is consistent with an approved tentative map. The
legislative body is also required to accept, accept subject to improvement or reject, on behalf of
the public, any real property offered for dedication for public use in conformity with the terms of
the offer of dedication. Staff recommends rejecting without prejudice to future acceptance, the
dedication of all streets and easements delineated as offers of dedication for street purposes,
public utility, slope, drainage, and emergency access easements. Staff has determined that the
Final Parcel Map is consistent with approved Tentative Parcel Map.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
• ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A: Final Tract Map 2001-0012 (Tract Map 2396)
Subdivision Improvement Agreement
November 12,2002 064
Final Map 2001-0012 Page 1 of 12
Exhibit A
Final Parcel Map 2001-0012(Tract Map 2396)
6250 San Gabriel Road
_ 3
I
tog 2 9 It
14
r
+..yam \I � ♦� a' //A wey ( / //L •
r ✓
1 p� x/ ! � � rr�., r.+-r��3r_✓�r✓rrrr�rlr�.§ J
�;:= Y.=-l-"., �� �f2 ,.'� ✓''„}����i•'r rrrr r ".'��✓
f
Y
< IID1.
•
October 30,2002
Tract Map 2396 Agreement Page 2 of 12 r
a �w
�e
-
7.
ow
# 133+5 3 s
fill
t7 7 f it
• J 4 � _...,.__/:� ~Y. °� } �� �y"thy,
IN
� J
O1 i
-01 K
UJ p
W
ill 3g3g ^ �' « ".a x✓�+ z� j#
3 �Y014 2s,
s1�'0
a o 11 s Y �1 saiixx
•
October 30,2002
Tract Map 2396 Agreement Page 3 of 12 ,
f`• C
is
s 3 l
sI
80eee0fle eekTgo 00
rit
\ Ott
✓7 3r `ta\.rsssao x j e
15— ° I`
� • tV / q.
42
� r� ,t ,✓ � ,...��j�y"� � t� �` jI l vis-+�oz
r
tit
October 30,2002
Tract Map 2396 Agreement Page 4 of 12
z r ns
3
2
tic
aIJ
ME
a
I i!
i• W
s�
I
I r I
JJI I ,
/ t �
16,
t
I J I
l
•
October 30,2002
Tract Map 2396 Agreement Page 5 of 12 t" `
CZE�'
Exhibit B
Final Parcel Map 2002-0042(Tract Map 2444)
9385 Musselman Ave.
•
FOR RECORDER USE ONLY
RECORDING REQUESTED BY:
City of Atascadero
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
City Clerk
City of Atascadero
6500 Palma Avenue
Atascadero, CA. 93422
CITY OF ATASCADERO
SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
•
DATE OF AGREEMENT:
NAME OFSUBDIVIDEP, RANCHO DE PARAISO, LLC
SUBDIVISION: 6250 SAN GABRIEL ROAD, TRACT 2396
ESTIMATED TOTAL COST OF IMPROVEMENTS: $287,000
This Agreement made and entered into by and between the City of Atascadero, a municipal
corporation of the State of California (hereinafter referred to as "City") and RANCHO DE
PARAISO, LLC(hereinafter referred to as"Subdivider").
RECITALS
A. Subdivider has presented to the City Council of the City of Atascadero Tract Map 2396 for
approval but not all of the improvements required or conditions imposed by Title 11,
Chapter 8 Articles 3 and 4 and Chapter 10 of the Atascadero Municipal Code have been
completed or performed.
B. Subdivider desires to record Tract Map 2396 after the same has been approved by the City
Council of the City of Atascadero.
•
October 30,2002
Tract Map 2396 Agreement Page 6 of 12 ,
• C. The Subdivision Laws establish as a condition precedent to the approval of a parcel map
that Subdivider must have either completed, in compliance with City Standards, all of the
improvements and land development work required by Tract Map 2396 or have entered
into a secured agreement with City to complete the improvements and land development
within a period of time specified by City.
D. In consideration of approval of Tract Map 2396 by the City Council, Subdivider desires to
enter into this Agreement, whereby Subdivider promises to install and complete, at the
Subdivider's own expense, all of the public improvement work required by City in
connection with S ubdivis ion.
E. Improvement Plans for the construction, installation and completion of the improvements
have been prepared by Subdivider and approved by the City Engineer. The Improvement
Plans for Tract Map 2396 are on file in the Office of the City Engineer and are incorporated
into this Agreement by this reference. All references in this Agreement to the Improvement
Plans shall include reference to any specifications for the improvements as approved by the
City E ngineer.
F. An estimate of the cost for construction of the public improvements according to the
Improvement Plans has been made and has been approved by the City Engineer. The
Estimated Total Cost of Improvements is stated on Page 1 of this Agreement. The basis for
the estimate is attached as Exhibit "A" to this Agreement.
. G. Subdivider recognizes that by approval of•TractMap 2396, City has conferred substantial
rights upon Subdivider, including the right to sell, lease, or finance lots within the
subdivision, and has taken the final act necessary to construct the public improvements
within the subdivision. As a result, City will be damaged to the extent of the cost of
installation of the improvements by S ubdivider's failure to perform its obligations under this
Agreement, including, but not limited to,Subdivider's obligation to commence construction
of the improvements by the time established in this Agreement. City shall be entitled to all
remedies available to it pursuant to this Agreement and law in event of a default by
Subdivider. It is specifically recognized that the determination of whether a reversion to
acreage or rescission of Tract Map 2396 constitutes an adequate remedy for default by the
Subdivider shall be within the sole discretion of City.
NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the provisions contained in the Atascadero Municipal Code, Title
11, Chapter 10,sections 11-10.010 through 11-10.022, and in consideration of the approval by the
City Council and the filing of Tract Map 2396, the parties hereto do promise and agree one with the
other as follows:
1. Subdivider is to make and complete all of the improvements for Tract Map 2396 as shown
on the Improvement Plans thereof and as required and set forth in Title 11, Chapter 8,
Articles 3 and 4, and Chapter 10, of the Atascadero Municipal Code, or as amended.
2. It is further understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto that the
improvements as required by the conditions of approval for Tract Map 2396 shall be
• completed within one year from the Date of Agreement. These improvements include, but
October 30,2002
Tract Map 2396 Agreement Page 7 of 12
are not limited to the following: those shown on the plans accepted by the City Engineer •
and on attached Exhibit A.
3. The Subdivider promises and agrees to complete all improvement work referred to
hereinabove to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
4. If said improvement work is not completed within one year of the Date of Agreement, the
Subdivider agrees that the City may elect to complete the same.
5. In the event the City elects to complete said work or improvement, the Subdivider agrees
that the City may exercise it's option to declare the bond or deposit, as hereinafter
described, forfeited and utilize the proceeds, including any interest, to complete said
improvements or that the City may complete said improvements and recover full cost and
expense thereof including reasonable attorney fees from the Subdivider and his/her surety.
6. The Subdivider shall, prior to submitting the map for filing, file an improvement security
with the City, in a form acceptable to the City Attorney, in the amount of the Estimated
Total Cost of Improvements, which is the amount deemed sufficient by the City Engineer.
In no case shall the improvement security be less than 100% of the Estimated Total Cost of
Improvements. Further, the Subdivider shall file a security for labor and materials in the
amount of the Estimated Total Cost of Improvements. The security for labor and materials
shall be no less than 50% of the Estimated Total Cost of Improvements. Periodic progress
payments may be authorized to the Subdivider as the improvements are completed if
adequate security remains as determined by the City Engineer, however, no such progress •
payments shall be made for more than 90% of the value of any work. Progress payments
shall only be paid on work that is completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
7. The Subdivider hereby agrees that after the completion and acceptance of the
improvements as specified in paragraphs 2 and 3, 10% of the improvement security shall be
retained for the guarantee and warranty of the work for a period of one year.
8. It is understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto that this Agreement shall
bind the heirs, executors, administrators, successors,and assigns of the respective parties to
this agreement. ,
9. In the event legal action is taken to enforce the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing
party shall be entitled to recover costs to enforce the Agreement, including reasonable
attorney fees.
10. The Subdivider shall, defend, indemnify and save harmless the City, its officers, agents and
employees from any and all claims, demands, damages, costs, expenses, or liability
occasioned by the performance and attempted performance of the provisions hereof, or in
any way arising out of this Agreement, including, but not limited to, inverse condemnation,
equitable relief, or any wrongful act or any negligent act or omission to act on the part of
the Property Owner or of agents, employees, or independent contractors directly
responsible to the Property Owner, providing further that the foregoing shall apply to any
wrongful acts, or any actively or passively negligent acts or omissions to act, committed •
jointly or concurrently by the Applicant, the Property Owner's agents, employees, or
October 30,2002
Tract Map 2396 Agreement Page 8 of 12 �
• independent contractors. Nothing contained in the foregoing indemnity provisions shall be
construed to require the Property Owner to indemnify the City against any responsibility or
liability in contravention of Section 2782 of the Civil Code.
11. Upon acceptance of the work on behalf of City and recordation of the Notice of
Completion, ownership of the improvements constructed pursuant to this Agreement shall
vest in City.
12. Sale or other disposition of this property will not relieve Subdivider form the obligations set
forth herein. Subdivider agrees to notify City in writing at least 30 days in advance of any
actual or pending sale or other disposition of the property. If Subdivider sells the property
or any portion of the property within the Subdivision to any other person, Subdivider may
request a novation of this Agreement and a substitution of security. Upon approval of the
novation and substitution of securities,Subdivider may request a release or reduction of the
securities required by this Agreement. Nothing in the novation shall relieve the Subdivider
of the obligations under Paragraph 2 for the work or improvement done bySubdivider.
13. All notices required or provided for under this Agreement shall be in writing and delivered
in person or sent by mail, postage prepaid and addressed as provided in this section.
Notice shall be effective on the date it is delivered in person, or, if mailed, on the date of
deposit in the United States Mail. Notices shall be addressed as follows unless a written
change of address is filed with City:
• City: City of Atascadero
6500 Palma Avenue
Atascadero, CA 93422
Subdivider: Rancho De Paraiso, LLC
6250 San Gabriel Road
Atascadero, CA 93422
S urety:
14. The provisions of this Agreement are severable. If any portion of this Agreement is held
invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of the Agreement shall remain in
full force and effect unless amended or modified by the mutual consent of the parties.
15. The Recitals to this Agreement are hereby incorporated into the terms of this Agreement.
16. This Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement of the parties with respect to the subject
matter. All modifications, amendments, or waivers of the terms of this Agreement must be
• in writing and signed by the appropriate representatives of the parties. In the case of City,
the appropriate party shall be the City Manager.
October 30,2002
Tract Map 2396 Agreement Page 9 of 12 ; r
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Property Owner has hereunto set his/her hand and the City has caused •
these presents to be signed by its duly sworn and authorized officers the day and year first
hereinabove written.
CITY OF ATASCADERO SUBDIVIDER:
By:
(notarize signature)
Wade G. McKinney
City Manager
Attest:
Marcia M. Torgerson
City Clerk
Approved as to content:
Steven B. Kahn, P.E. •
City E ngineer
Approved as to form:
Roy Hanley
City Attorney
•
October 30,2002
Tract Map 2396 Agreement Page 10 of 12
C
• Exhibit A
aye,.► F r �.;�.-_• � ^' �3`�s��,r1���.
NO. !tarn rkncrlptblt Quef v Unita . unit Gorst ttem Total Totab
t tlAobglzetion 0.5 LS $2,600.00 $1.250.00
mobteratlon Total 51250.04
2 mto CWar and Grubb 1 LS m.00 MEW= $0.00
la"S Dam�[lon
Wsawart-" iso LF $1.00 S150.m
terripwary treo re--kV 900 LF 3.CX1 eC1Ytp<9te
>3eernlltlbn oval $f50.00
r-::4:Eerthwark
W 7311 CY $4.00 cmtplela
fm 7422 CY $4.00 ate
nilh Offidft 1 L3 $6, 0f 00 $5,000.00
erosbn oordrol 54060 . SF 0,05 52.700.00
E.tr*t Tesfat 37,700.00
5 Road Suriaoe lmprovameMta
truffle eWtrol 1 LS 51.000,0 $1 00110
0 bag berth dike 2700 LF -43.0 :R. ,_$8,100.00
,.may 7B'-WPW 54,W0 SF $0.70 $37.800.00
Class 2 ag base 12W CY $47.00 558750.00
nta 180 SF $3. 5940.00
Standard Street Wnwttept 21 EA $400:00 $8,400.0
3 EA $179.0 5525.00
molWy asiataV d1Ws Q Portal Road 3 EA 51,550.00 $4;500.00
Road Burtaea IMP.Tata! 5119,615.00
.r.
• t3
24tnctt 24-tr h-' r m Erosion Control
Stom1 dtratlt pyo 70 LF S35.00 orxnpiete .
18.InCn$WRn drain POO 90 LF $90.00 mrnpleta
12-inch Slarn drain pipe 40 LF 320.00 rontdn
aedintantatbn barriers muf 1 L91 STA00.00 51050.00
rookrO-cap 40 Cy $126.00 Corn a
rural drWnM k9et 2 EA $1,800.60 cafe ete
curb&SIM96 InIM i EA $2,000.0 cornptete
Mtnch Storm drams 120 LF -45too Corn ata
60-tnctl Fbred and 1 L3 5500.00 carnplato
Ov"Ide Drain 1 LS 150.00 3150.00
Raga an Tat>31 $115000
7 Water tem kn rovernents
!;.Inch PVC water one 2400 LF $20.00 $48,000.00
tl�64n b sz ifs&Inch PVC water S EA $00.00 $1,600.00
"chadevalve 12 EA $750.00 $9.000.00
fire hydrant rrasern 6 ;k2.100.00 s 12.60.00
airrelaaao Volvo 1EA $900.00 W0.00
thrustbbcks 12 EA $t26.00 $t.�
1.9-Ind, anwattcvlc*Worst 1 E4 $600.00 4000.00A0.00
ser
�ynvreto bads#or w7kw lim 10 CY $90.00 $00.00
irtat#I PR1/repiac emedt stat;at Portal Rd. 1 LS $0.000.00 S8,Om m
rr3iDceta'exl9tl viafertnster 2 EA $.'+00.00 E1.mU1p
WatarTotal $84,000.00
9 SITE UTILTRES
Electric 2700 LF 54.00 51 800.00
Pelona.. 2700 LF $2.00 $5,400.00
Gas 2700 LF $S 00 $i6 .00
CabIaTV 270 LF $3.00 $8.100.00
v;.: gFtvtk9ltteesTotal
3us•TOTAL az .ses av
&Sr.Ophon of Prbbabla Coat-R8nft de paralw I
October 30,2002
Tract Map 2396 Agreement Page 11 of 12 j 1
2002 15:33 8054521392 RTHOMPSONCONSLILTING PAGE 03
1U mi8Ca1t9ita011s
Burvsying 1 Coost.La 1 LS $3,600.00
action/T 1 LS 63,500.00
10%C ontilvafty .36.
f4l000 9i7ODUS Total eYJ d46 �
CRMO TOTAL $2&8 BU1 SQ
SAY $287,000.04
red R W'
RusmO B.'rhompWn P Data
Rwtat�redCv3FnpinrC43.064 _ 6xa_3-31-04
Ems-ON*m el Probable C oII-RMCI D do PSMISO 8
•
October 30,2002
Tract Map 2396 Agreement Page 12 of 12
ITEM NUMBER: A-7
DATE: 11/12/2002
r.
Iola 9
• CM
Atascadero City Council
Agenda Report- Public Works Department
Award of Contract for Downtown Streetscape Design Services
RECOMMENDATION:
Council authorize the City Manager to execute amendment #2 to the Consultant Services
Agreement with RRM Design Group to produce the conceptual design and construction
documents for Downtown Streetscape.
DISCUSSION:
• The City Council recently approved the Downtown Streetscape design. The construction
documents for the street, median, crosswalks, curb, gutter and sidewalks are being produced by
City Staff. The City hired RRM Design Group to provide conceptual design and construction
documents for the street furniture and landscaping.
The original contract with RRM for conceptual design services was signed on May 21, 2001.
Amendment # 1 for meetings, presentations, exhibits and construction documents was signed on
July 23, 2002. The total fee for these two items was $23,100.00. RRM is now in the process of
completing the construction documents.
Extra services have been requested by the City to complete the job. These extra services included
meetings, detailed construction cost estimates and expanded construction document scope. The
fee for these extra services is $6,500.00. The cost of these additional services makes the total
contract over $25,000.00. The City of Atascadero Purchasing Policy requires that professional
services over $25,000.00 be awarded by the City Council.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Original contract: $ 7,000.00.
Amendment #1: $16,100.00
Amendment#2: $ 6,500.00
• Total $29,600.00
ITEM NUMBER: A-7
DATE: 11/12/2002
These funds are budgeted in the Project budget.
•
ALTERNATIVES:
Do not authorize the City Manager to execute amendment#2—The design will not be completed
for this budgeted project.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachments: A-Original Contract
B-Amendment # 1
C-Amendment #2
•
6t,7
• Contract No.
CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT
This agreement is made upon the date of execution, as forth below, by and
between R.R.M.Design Group,Inc., hereinafter referred to as"Consultant", and the
CITY OF ATASCADERO, a Municipal Corporation, hereinafter referred to as"City".
The parties hereto, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, hereby
agree to the following terms and conditions:
1:00 GENERAL PROVISIONS
1.01 TERM: This agreement will become effective on the date of execution set
forth below, and will continue in effect until terminated as provided herein.
1.02 SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED BY CONSULTANT: Consultant
agrees to perform or provide the services specified "Scope of Work" attached
hereto as"Exhibit A" hereby incorporated herein.
Consultant shall determine the method, details and means of performing
the above-referenced services.
• Consultant may, at Consultant's own expense, employ such assistants, as
Consultant deems necessary to perform the services required of Consultant by this
agreement. City may not control, direct or supervise Consultant's assistants or
employees in the performance of those services.
1.03 COMPENSATION: In consideration for the services to be performed by
Consultant, City agrees to pay Consultant:
(1) A not to exceed fee of Seven Thousand Dollars and no Cents ($7,000.00).
This not to exceed fee shall include all expenses including any customarily
identified as "reimbursable expenses. >�O�
(2) Consultant shall submit monthly progress reports to City indicating the
state-of-completion of each task specified in Exhibit A.
(3) Any claim for payment for extra services or changes in the services will be
paid by City only upon certification by the Director of Public Works that
the claimed extra service or change was authorized in advance by the
Director of Public Works, and that the service has been satisfactorily
completed. Invoices for extra services which are approved by the Director
of Public Works must be submitted by Consultant within thirty (30) days
of completion of such services and must be accompanied by a statement of
itemized costs covering said services.
•
(4) Consultant shall be paid no later than thirty(30) days following approval •
of Consultant's progress report and invoice. Any additional applicable
hourly rate billings must be pre-authorized in writing.
2:00 OBLIGATIONS OF CONSULTANT
2.01 MINIMUM AMOUNT OF SERVICE BY CONSULTANT: Consultant
agrees to devote the hours necessary to perform the services set forth in this
agreement in an efficient and effective manner. Consultant may represent,
perform services for and be employed by additional individuals or entities, in
Consultant's sole discretion, as long as the performance of these extra-contractual
services does not interfere with or presents a conflict with City's business.
2.02 TOOLS AND INSTRUMENTALITIES: Consultant shall provide all tools
and instrumentalities to perform the services under this agreement.
2.03 WORKER'S COMPENSATION AND OTHER EMPLOYEE
BENEFITS: City and Consultant intend and agree that Consultant is an
independent Consultant of City and agrees that Consultant and Consultant's
employees and agents have no right to worker's compensation and other
employee benefits. If any worker insurance protection is desired, Consultant
agrees to provide worker's compensation and other employee benefits, where
required by law, for Consultant's employees and agents. Consultant agrees to bold •
harmless and indemnify City for any and all claims arising out of any claim for
injury, disability, or death of any of Consultant and Consultant's employees or
agents.
2.04 INDEMNIFICATION: Consultant hereby agrees to, and shall, hold City,
its elective and appointive boards, officers, agents and employees, harmless and
bcd�id tcsaaa from any liability for damage or claims for damage, or suits
/negligent acts, or actions at law or in equity which may)allcgay arise from Consultant's or any
errors or of Consultanus employees' agents' a1Cwaiu=)bCy 0on@Abemt or by any one or
omissions more persons UWl XkkkKemkxemployed by, or acting as agent for,
Consultant; provided as follows:
a. That the City does not, and shall not, waive any rights against Consultant
which it may have by reason of the aforesaid hold-harmless agreement,
because of the acceptance by City, or the deposit with City by Consultant,
of any of the insurance policies hereinafter described.
9?1h
xxxxx�' �}xa�.ft��sAidc�.s��dr��cr���c� st��:�Cl� xs �C�t�x�P
amX16MagCKscRxdx dAimahR X'WXYJkWAA
li# � X �D; C ��a��fCxbs�c �sizic��xxisc�£x
��t xyr�aecag�xbc�nc�r�cl�lc�ac�of�uccrxsud��cae�tx�be,��x�x�t�� Fx
t41E �i�4xi�stt�aitx'x�2cbiic�cl�clfla�ax�t�aia�dcl�oclOr� �
����rx�csa.i�c d a awes x�ax�la i�ag�fi�x xa�c
079
• 2.05 INSURANCE: Consultant shall not commence work under this contract until
s/he shall have obtained all insurance required under this section and such
insurance shall have been approved by City as to form, amount and carrier:
a. Public Liability and Property Damage Insurance. Consultant shall take
out and maintain during the life of this contract such public liability and
property damage insurance as shall protect City, its elective and
appointive boards, officers, agents and employees, and Consultant and any
agents and employees performing work covered by this contract from
claims for damages for personal injury, including death, as well as from
claims for property damage which may arise from Consultant's or any
Sub-consultant's operations under this contract, whether such operations
be by Consultant or by anyone directly or indirectly employed by
Consultant and the amounts of such insurance shall be as follows:
(1) Public Liability Insurance.
In an amount not less than One Million Dollars ($ 1,000,000)for
injuries, including, but not limited to death to any one person and,
subject to the same limit for each person, in an amount not less
than One Million Dollars ($ 1,000,000) on account of any one
. occurrence.
(2) Property Damage Insurance.
In an amount of not less than One Million Dollars ($ 1,000,000)
for damage to the property of each person on account of any one
occurrence.
(3) Comprehensive Automobile Liability.
Bodily injury liability coverage of One Million Dollars
($1,000,000) for each person in any one accident and One Million
Dollars ($ 1,000,000) for injuries sustained by two or more persons
in any one accident. Property damage liability of One Million
Dollars ($ 1,000,000) for each accident.
(4) Professional liability,
In an amount not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000).
b. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions:
Any deductible or self-insured retention must be declared to, and approved
by, the City. The City may require that either the insurer reduce or
eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the City,
• its elected or appointed officials, employees, agents, or volunteers; or the
U
Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of all •
administration and legal expenses.
C. Proof of Insurance.
Consultant shall furnish City, concurrently with the execution hereof, with
satisfactory proof of carriagedf the insurance required, and adequate legal
assurance that each carrier will give City at least thirty(30) days' prior
notice of the cancellation of any policy during the effective period of this
contract. The certificate or policy of liability of insurance shall name City
as an additional insured with the Consultant.
3:00 OBLIGATIONS OF CITY
3.01 COOPERATION: City agrees to comply with all reasonable requests
of Consultant necessary to the performance of Consultant's duties under this
agreement.
4:00 TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT
4.01 TERMINATION ON NOTICE: Notwithstanding any other provision
of this agreement, at any time, without cause by giving at least (30) days prior
written notice to the other parties to this agreement.
4.02 TERMINATION ON OCCURRENCE OF STATED EVENTS: •
This agreement shall terminate automatically on the occurrence of
any of the following events:
(1) Bankruptcy or insolvency of any party;
(2) Sale of the business of any party;
(3) Death of any party;
(4) The end of the (30) days as set forth in Section 4.01; e,«
(5) End of the contract to which Consultant's services�4cessary;
or
(6) Assignment of this agreement by Consultant without the consent of
the City.
4.03 TERMINATION BY ANY PARTY FOR DEFAULT OF
CONSULTANT: Should any party default in the performance of this
agreement or materially breach any of its provisions, a non-breaching party, at
their option, may terminate this agreement, immediately, by giving written notice
of termination to the breaching party.
4.04 TERMINATION: This Agreement shall terminate within SIXTY (60)
CALENDAR DAYS from the receipt of the written Notice to Proceed signed by
the Director of Public Works unless extended as set forth in this Section. The •
City, with the agreement of the Consultant, is authorized to extend the term of this
• Agreement beyond the termination date, as needed, under the same terms and
conditions set forth in this Agreement. Any such extension shall be in writing and
be an amendment to this Agreement.
5:00 OWNERSHIP OF DATA The ownership of all data collected for use by
Consultant under this Agreement, together with working papers,drawings, and other
materials necessary for a complete understanding of the plans and necessary for the
practical use of the plans shall be vested in City. Ownership of original drawings and
documents shall be vested in City. Consultant may retain a copy of all work for his own
e ** See attachment "A"
6:00 MISCELLANEOUS
6.01 REMEDIES: The remedies set forth in this agreement shall not be
exclusive but shall be cumulative with, and in addition to, all remedies new or
hereafter allowed by law or equity.
6.02 NO WAIVER: The waiver of any breach by any party of any
provision of this agreement shall not constitute a continuing waiver or a waiver of
any subsequent breach of this agreement.
6.03 ASSIGNMENT: This agreement is specifically not assignable by
• Consultant to any person or entity..Any assignment or attempt to assign by
Consultant, whether it be voluntary�or involuntary, by operation of law or
otherwise, is void and is a material breach of this agreement giving rise to a right
to terminate as set forth in Section 4.03.
6.04 ATTORNEY FEES: In the event of any controversy, claim or dispute
between the parties hereto, arising out of or relating to this agreement, or the
breach thereof, the prevailing party shall be entitled, in addition to other such
relief as may be granted, to a reasonable sum as and for attorney fees.
6.05 TIME FOR PERFORMANCE: Except as otherwise expressly
provided for in this agreement, should the performance of any act required by this
agreement to be performed by either party be prevented or delayed by reason by
any act of God, strike, lockout, labor trouble, inability to secure materials, or any
other cause except financial inability not the fault of the party required to perform
the act, the time for performance of the act will be extended for a period of time
equivalent to the period of delay and performance of the act during the period of
delay will be excused; provided, however, that nothing contained in this Section
shall exclude the prompt payment by either party as required by this agreement or
the performance of any act rendered difficult or impossible solely because of the
financial condition of the party required to perform the act.
• 6.06 NOTICES: Except as otherwise expressly provided by law, any and all
notices or other communications required or permitted by this agreement or by
law to be served on or given to any party to this agreement shall be in writing and
shall be deemed duly served and given when personally delivered or in lieu of
such personal service when deposited in the United States mail, first-class postage
prepaid to the following address for each respective party:
PARTY ADDRESS
CITY OF ATASCADERO 6500 Palma Avenue
Atascadero, CA 93422
Attention: Public Works
RRM Design Group, Inc. 3701 South Higuera Street
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
6.07 GOVERNING LAW: This agreement and all matters relating to
this agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California in force at •
the time any need for the interpretation of this agreement or any decision or
holding concerning this agreement arises.
6.08 BINDING EFFECT: This agreement shall be binding on and shall
inure to the benefit of the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns
of the parties hereto, but nothing in this Section shall be construed as a consent by
City to any assignment of this agreement or any interest in this agreement.
6.09 SEVERABILITY: Should any provision of this agreement be held by a
court of competent jurisdiction or by a legislative or rulemaking act to be either
invalid, void or unenforceable, the remaining provisions of this agreement shall
remain in full force and effect, unimpaired by the holding, legislation or rule.
6.10 SOLE AND ENTIRE AGREEMENT: This agreement constitutes
the sole and entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject
matter hereof. This agreement correctly sets forth the obligations of the parties
hereto to each other as of the date of this agreement. All agreements or
representations respecting the subject matter of this agreement not expressly set
forth or referred to in this agreement are null and void.
6.11 TIME: Time is expressly declared to be of the essence of this agreement.
6.12 DUE AUTHORITY:The parties hereby represent that the individuals •
executing this agreement are expressly authorized to do so on and in behalf of the
parties.
•
6.13 CONSTRUCTION: The parties agree that each has had an opportunity
to have their counsel review this agreement and that any rule of construction to
the effect that ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting party shall not
apply in the interpretation of this agreement or any amendments of exhibits
thereto. The captions of the sections are for convenience and reference only, and
are not intended to be construed to define or limit the provisions to which they
relate.
6.14 AMENDMENTS: Amendments to this agreement shall be in writing
and shall be made only with the mutual written consent of all of the parties to this
agreement.
Executed on �rl�f Z t , UC)1, 2 at Atascadero
CITY OF ATASCADERO
• WADE G. McKINNEY ST J. KAHN
City Manager Director of Public Works
CONSULTANT
B
eff rber, ASLA
Principal
Director of Planning & Landscape Architecture Division
•
EXHIBIT A
El Camino Real Sidewalk Improvements Project •
Scope of Work
March 20, 2001
This project is for the design of the frontage Improvements for the Carlton Hotel. The
limits of the project will be the intersection of El Camino Real and Traffic Way to 100 ft
past the Carlton Hotel on Traffic Way and to Entrada Ave. on El Camino Real. The plans
shall detail the curb, gutter and sidewalk, bulb-outs, planters, street lights, street trees,
signs and street furniture. The funding for the Conceptual Plan shall be from the El
Camino Real Pedestrian and Operational Project and the funding for the Construction
Documents shall be from the 2000 CDBG Sidewalk Improvements.
1. Conceptual Plan ($7,000.00 not to exceed/hourly)
The City of Atascadero shall provide a detailed topographic survey of the project limits.
The consultant will prepare a concept plan of possible streetscape improvements for the
project area. The improvements will be closely coordinated with the Carlton Hotel design
team and the Main Street Committee. A detailed estimate of probable construction cost
will be provided.
Deliverables: Streetscape concept plan and sketches (2) at 11" x 17", analysis of
probable cost, correspondence, meeting minutes.
Meetings: Kickoff meeting (1), Carlton Team Meeting (2), Main Street Committee •
8 .ff 8 8
Meeting(2), design meetings (2).
2. Construction Documents (not included)
The Consultant shall provide construction document for the project. The plans shall
include information on demolition, horizontal and vertical control, irrigation and
planting, lighting (engineering design not included), specification (City format and
General Conditions)
Exclusions: Utility relocation, traffic engineering, storm drains, geotechnical and soils
investigation, electrical engineering, traffic loops relocation,pre-bid meetings and
construction administration.
Deliverables:Plans, specifications, statement of probable cost, meeting minutes.
Meetings: 75%and 100%progress review meeting(2)
• Attachment"A"
70 rship of Documents
The Client acknowledges the Design Professional's construction documents, including all
documents on electronic media, as instruments of professional service. Nevertheless, such
documents, plans and specifications prepared under this Agreement shall become the property of
the Client upon completion of the work and payment in full of all monies due to the Design
professional. The Client shall not reuse or make any modification to the plans and specifications
without the prior written authorization of the Design Professional. The Client agrees, to the
fullest extent permitted by law, to indemnify and hold the Design Professional harmless from
any claim, liability or cost (including reasonable attorneys' fees and defense costs) arising out of
any unauthorized reuse or modification of the construction documents by the Client or any
person or entity that acquires or obtains the plans and specifications from or through the Client
without the written authorization of the Design Professional.
•
Page-1-0-1
RRM DESIGN GROUP
Architecture • Planning • Engineering • Surveying • Interiors • Landscape Architecture •
;EXHIBI A-f.
GENERAL"PROVISIONS.ANf) CONDITIONS
EMPLOYEE RATES(HOURLY)
Principal $100 to $160 Engineering Field Staff
Principal Planner,Licensed Surveyor,Civil/Traffic Engineer $ 70 to $100 Licensed Surveyor $ 75 to $100
Project Architect,Project Manager,Landscape Architect, 2-person Survey Crew $120
Senior Planner,Construction Services $ 60 to $100 3-person Survey Crew $150
Job Captain,Senior Designer $ 50 to $ 85 GPS/Robotic Survey Crew
Surveyor,Technician,Associate Planner,CAD Operator $ 40 to $ 75 1-person $110
Designer $ 30 to $ 70 2-person $155
Assistant Planner,Support Staff $ 20 to $ 55
Hourly rates vary according to employee experience and proficiency,and may be adjusted from time to time to reflect current costs and changes
in employee classifications. Hourly rates for expert witness services or depositions shall be subject to a premium of 2x the standard hourly rate. Overtime,
for hourly employees if requested,shall be charged at 1.5x the standard hourly rate,depending upon the employee wage multiplier required by law.
FIRM Design Group agrees to strive to perform the services set forth in this Agreement in accordance with generally accepted professional
practice,as applicable,in the same or similar localities,at the time the services are performed. FIRM Design Group's services shall not be subject to any
express or implied warranties whatsoever.
SUBCONSULTANT EXPENSES. The fee for subconsultants of FIRM Design Group is at actual cost plus 10%to cover our overhead and administrative
expenses. Typical subconsultants may include:
Structural Engineer Irrigation Consultant Geological Consultant
Mechanical Engineer Arborist Archaeological Consultant
Electrical Engineer Soils Consultant Traffic Consultant
Client recognizes that site and subsurface conditions may vary from those observed at the locations where borings,surveys or explorations are made,and
that site and subsurface conditions may change with time. Data, interpretations and recommendations by FIRM Design Group will be based solely on •
information available to FIRM Design Group from appropriate subconsultants, to the extent that FIRM Design Group has not produced such data,
interpretations or recommendations itself. FIRM Design Group shall be responsible for its data, interpretations and recommendations, but it will not be
responsible for other parties'interpretations or use of the information developed,or for information provided by others.
REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES. Clients shall reimburse FIRM Design Group for incidental expenses incurred by FIRM Design Group,or any subconsultant
they may hire in the interest of this Agreement, at actual cost plus 10% to cover our overhead and administrative expenses. Reimbursable expenses
include,but are not limited to reproduction,postage and handling of drawings and documents,long distance communications,fees paid to authorities having
jurisdiction over the Project,the expense of any additional insurance requested by the Client in excess of that normally carried by FIRM Design Group or its
subconsultants,and the following if authorized by the Client: travel expenses for work outside of the CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO,renderings and models,
and the expense of overtime work requiring higher than regular rates. Reimbursable automobile travel mileage will be billed at the current IRS business
standard mileage rate.
RRM DESIGN GROUP REPRODUCTIONS. Photocopies: $.20 per copy. All other types of FIRM Design Group reproductions such as blueprinting,
process camera,typesetting and printing shall be billed at the local vendor's current rate plus 10%to cover our overhead and administrative expenses.
FEES AND PAYMENTS. Fees for employee rates,subconsultant expenses,reimbursable expenses,and FIRM Design Group reproductions shall be billed
to the Client on a percentage of completion or on an as-performed basis as agreed by the parties. PAYMENT SHALL BE DUE AND PAYABLE UPON
PRESENTATION. In order to defray carrying charges resulting from delayed payments,a finance charge at 1.5%per month shall be added to the unpaid
balance after forty-five(45)days from the date of FIRM Design Group's invoice.
COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. FIRM Design Group's work will commence immediately upon receipt of your retainer and signed authorization to proceed.
If notice to proceed is delayed beyond thirty(30)days,it is understood that the terms and conditions of this Agreement are subject to revision.
TERMINATION,SUSPENSION OR ABANDONMENT. Failure of the Client to make payments to FIRM Design Group when due in accordance with this
Agreement shall be considered substantial nonperformance and cause for termination. If the Client fails to make payment when due FIRM Design Group for
services and expenses,FIRM Design Group may,upon seven(7)days written notice to the Client,suspend performance of services under this Agreement.
Unless payment in full is received by FIRM Design Group within seven (7)days of the date of the notice,the suspension shall take effect without further
notice. In the event of a suspension of services,FIRM Design Group shall have no liability to the Client for delay,damage,loss of agency approvals,loss of
financing,interest expenses,etc.caused the Client because of such suspension of service. •
ADDITIONAL SERVICES. If FIRM Design Group is requested by the Client to perform service or incur subconsultant expenses due to changes ordered by
the Client,or to expand or modify the scope of services specified in this Agreement,the Client agrees to pay FIRM Design Group in accordance with the
Employee Rates and Subconsultant Expenses described above,and any other provisions of this Agreement.
M
3701 South Higuera Street,San Luis Obispo,CA 93401 (805)543-1794 Fax: 543-4609
131 So.2^d Avenue,Oakdale,CA 95361 (209)847-1794 Fax: 847-2511
•
R R M D E S I G N G R O U P
March 22, 2001
Via Facsimile: (805)461-761513 Pages
Mr. Steve Kahn
Public Works Director
City of Atascadero
6500 Palma
Atascadero, CA 93422
Re: Carlton Hotel Frontage Improvements
Key Staff Billing Rates
Dear Mr. Kahn:
Following please find RRM Design Group's key staff billing rages, effective April 1, 2001 to
March 31, 2002 for the Carlton Hotel Frontage Improvements project:
•
Jeff Ferber $125.00 per hour
Tony Keith $ 90.00 per hour
Rob Carnes $ 90.00 per hour
Ann Sever $ 75.00 per hour
Lief McKay $ 55.00 per hour
We have also attached our Exhibit A-1 for your review and approval.
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to give me a call at (805) 543-1794.
Sincerely,
RRM DESIGN GROUP
Tony eith
Principal Planner
Attachment
•
n/X PO I036/tk-KahnRates
AMENDMENT#1 TO CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF ATASCADERO AND RRM DESIGN GROUP INC. i
This amendment #1 is made to the Agreement dated May 21, 2001 ("Agreement") by and
between the City of Atascadero ("City") and RRM Design Group Inc. ("Consultant") for
architectural and streetscape design services.
In consideration of the mutual promises, covenants and agreements set forth herein, the parties
agree as follows:
1. Upon execution, this Amendment shall become part of the agreement.
2. The scope of services shall be amended to include work described in the July 11,
2002 Additional Services Scope of Work proposal (Attachment 1).
3. Authorized expenditures shall remain that same as specified in the Agreement.
4. The expiration date of the agreement shall be extended from July 21, 2001 to
December 31, 2002.
5. Except as otherwise provided in this amendment, the terms and conditions contained
in Agreement remain in full force and effect.
Amendment executed by the parties as follows:
CitAtascadero
Y:
Brady Cherry
Assistant City Manager
2Z O Z � %L
St e Kahn Date Wade McKinney Date
Director of Public Works City Manager
Approved as to Form: Consultant
_ 2 7 /J
R anley Date J er r, SL
Ci y ttorney Principal, RRM
Attachment: 1. July 11,2002 Additional Scope of Services i
•
RRM DES IGv GROUP
Coeatin��wiunmuus/�eeple�n�oy
ATASCADERO STREETSCAPE
ADDITIONAL SERVICES SCOPE OF WORK
July ll, 2002
The Atascadero Main Street Design Review Committee (AMSDRC) has researched certain materials and
products and has made a presentation to the City of Atascadero Community Redevelopment Agency
(ACRA) on Tuesday, July 9, 2002. RRM Design Group has been requested to review and provide
professional recommendations for streetscape elements. RRM was directed to review these
recommendations and provide their professional expertise as to the appropriate selection of preferred
streetscape elements.
1.0 ACRA Meetings Fee: $ 550.00
RRM will attend two(2)ACRA meetings in regard to this matter.
Deliverables: Attend two (2)ACRA meetings.
2.0 Research Fee: $1,700.00
RRM will accordingly research and present information to the City of Atascadero Community
• Redevelopment Agency on the following:
a. Light fixtures
b. Number of luminaries to be used for each light fixture
c. Color and material options for light poles
d. Trash can with incorporated ashtray and logo
e. Irrigated, round concrete planters including colors, styles and materials
f. Benches with wooden slats and cast iron ends
g. Appropriate historical symbols(in coordination with Historical Society)
h. Paving treatment
i. Tree grates
j. Tree guards
Deliverables: Product literature and samples.
3.0 Concept Plan for Presentation to ACRA Fee: $3,800.00
RRM will prepare an illustrative plan for streetscape improvements in conjunction with plans
dated May 24, 2002 prepared by the City of Atascadero's Engineering Department. The work
product will be a colored plan at an appropriate scale with support graphics as deemed necessary
by RRM to sufficiently convey the intent of the design. RRM was asked by ACRA to incorporate
recommendations provided by AMSDRC where appropriate,and make the necessary adjustments
to the proposed street improvement plans dated May 24, 2002. Therefore, one (1) alternate
design solution will be explored by RRM in response to the suggestions for the Carlton Hotel
Exterior Design Elements offered by the AMSDC. In conjunction with this revised plan, RRM
• will prepare a preliminary statement of probable cost for the items noted above.
Deliverables: One(1)30"x 42" rendered plan, one(])analysis of probable cost.
San Lnis Obispo•Oakdale•F ealdsburg•Los Angeles
3765 South Higuera Street,SUiM 102•San Luis Obispo,California 93401•Phone:805/543-1794•Fax:805i543-46o9•www.rrmttesign.com
.I--- --1— - 1
•
ATASCADERO STREETSCAPE
ADDITIONAL SERVICES SCOPE OF WORK
July 11, 2002
4.0 Streetscape Elements Booklet and PowerPoint Slideshow Fee: $1,700.00
The information will be prepared in a digital format and booklet format for future presentations or
available for distribution to the public in a hard copy. The final product will provide specific
manufacturer, model number, and finish requirements such that any property owner in the
Uptown Atascadero area may elect to incorporate the selected streetscape elements in future
private development.
Deliverables: One(1)PowerPoint slide show(maximum 20 images).
5.0 Landscape Construction Documents and Specifications Fee: $8,350.00
RRM will prepare construction documents at an appropriate scale for the following; landscape
plant materials, irrigation system and site furniture placement. The plans shall include necessary
layout diagrams, details and specifications to construct the defined improvements. Project
specifications in CSI format will be prepared to control the workmanship,quality of materials and
installation methods of the specified plan elements under this agreement. Submittals for this
work will be at 50% (review), 90% (plan check) and 100% (construction ready). RRM will
prepare a statement of probable cost upon 100% completion of the construction documents for the
items noted above. •
Deliverables: Construction documents at 5051o, 90%and 100%(to be attached to City
construction set), one(1)reproducible copy, and one(I)digital copy.
Specifications 8.5"x 11"format(to be attached to City construction
specification set, one(1)statement of probable cost.
Exclusions: RRM specifically excludes from this agreement any utility coordination,bid assistance
and construction observation. Should these services be requested by the City Engineer,we would
be happy to provide a written proposal.
•
tk/1401037\AddServ\AtascaderoScope.7.11.02 ,
AMENDMENT#2 TO CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT
• BETWEEN THE CITY OF ATASCADERO AND RRM DESIGN GROUP INC.
This amendment #2 is made to the Agreement dated May 21, 2001 ("Agreement") by and
between the City of Atascadero ("City") and RRM Design Group Inc. ("Consultant") for
architectural and streetscape design services.
In consideration of the mutual promises, covenants and agreements set forth herein, the parties
agree as follows:
1. Upon execution, this Amendment shall become part of the agreement.
2. The scope of services shall be amended to include work described in the November
12, 2002 Additional Services Scope of Work proposal.
3. Authorized expenditures shall remain that same as specified in the Agreement.
4. The expiration date of the agreement shall be extended from July 21, 2001 to January
15, 2003.
5. Except as otherwise provided in this amendment, the terms and conditions contained
in Agreement remain in full force and effect.
• Amendment executed by the parties as follows:
City of Atascadero By:
Steve Kahn Date Wade McKinney Date
Director of Public Works City Manager
Approved as to Form: Consultant
Roy Hanley Date Jeff Ferber, ASLA
City Attorney Principal, RRM
•
ATASCADERO STREETSCAPE •
ADDITIONAL SERVICES SCOPE OF WORK
November 12,2002
The following tasks were added or changed from the original scope of work and amendment# 1:
1.0 Three (3) separate versions of the associated streetscape improvement plan were
prepared to represent the new project limits to demonstrate options in the
improvements being considered.
2.0 Three (3) cost estimates prepared to accompany the streetscape improvement plan
were prepared to represent the new project limits and options.
3.0 Design services increased with added Project limits from West side of ECR from
Traffic Way to West Mall and to include improvements fronting the property
owned by the city at the NEC of Traffic Way and El Camino Real. Project budget
increased.
Fee: $6,500.00(hourly not to exceed)
•
•
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
i
DATE: 11/12/2002
•1918' I,_ � 1979 "'
Atascadero City Council
City Attorney Report
Urgency Ordinance - Off Premises Auto Sales
and Introduction of Permanent Ordinance to Same Effect
RECOMMENDATIONS:
City Council:
1. Adopt, by a 4/5 vote, draft Urgency Ordinance restricting off-premises sales of
automobiles.
2. . Introduce for first reading, by title only, draft Ordinance forbidding off-site auto
. sales events.
DISCUSSION:
The City Council, Community Development Department and the City Attorney have been
working towards the adoption of a City ordinance, which will constitutionally regulate the
conduct of off-premises automobile sales events within the City. The City currently has no
permanent ordinance. The City Council, Community Development Department, City
Attorney, and staff have received and acquired information, both significant in amount and
content, to assist the City Council in making this legislative decision. This decision is
difficult because of two conflicting City Council concerns. A significant segment of the
community has objected to the holding of these sales events, citing the inability to control
significant violations of the Municipal Code regarding signage and noise violations. There is
also the desire of the owners of parking lots on property to increase their own ability to
engage in business and prosper.
Staffs task is, therefore, to help the City Council balance those interests and enact an
ordinance that serves the City's needs and is constitutional as well as enforceable. It would
serve no useful purpose to enact an unconstitutional or unenforceable ordinance.
Staff has identified certain health and safety concerns with the conduct of such sales.
• Specifically the holders of these events have used traveling trailer-mounted signs with loud
stereos making use of the noise of the stereo to attract attention to the sign. Although the
ITEM NUMBER: B- 1
DATE: 11/12/2002
vehicle code does allow such trailers to travel on roads, the City is allowed to regulate the
use of such signs and Atascadero does prohibit the parking of such signs for purposes of •
advertising. The holders of these events regularly park such signs and do park them in front
of other legally located and operating auto dealers in the City. The holders of these events
also have shown a tendency to excessively cover the town in off-premise signs. Many of the
off-premises signs are unattended and also otherwise illegal. It is not practical for the staff to
effectively police these activities,and the health of the citizens is adversely affected by all of
the impacts previously mentioned. The small fines that a court may legally impose do not
serve as sufficient deterrent to the illegal activity that affects the citizens.
Staff therefore feels that the City Council may adopt an urgency ordinance forbidding such
sales. Urgency ordinances must pass by a 4/5 vote to be effective. They become
immediately effective, but are valid for only a limited period of time (up to 10 months).
Staff intends to have a permanent ordinance for review and recommendation by the
planning commission at its next regular meeting. The permanent ordinance will be back
before this council well before the urgency ordinance sunsets.
The suggested permanent ordinance has been to Planning Commission for review. The
minutes of that meeting are not available, but the Commission did vote to recommend
adoption to the City Council. Since the report for the Planning Commission was prepared
there have been at least two inquiries about holding such events. For that reason staff is
suggesting adopting an interim ordinance and introducing the permanent ordinance for first
reading at the same Council meeting. If the urgency ordinance receives 4 votes, then it
becomes immediately in effect. Urgency ordinances have a limited life span. However, the •
permanent ordinance will become effective 30 days after second reading. The urgency
ordinance, if adopted, will not have lapsed before the permanent ordinance goes into effect.
Staff therefore recommends that the City Council take both actions.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None has been identified, but staff will examine the sales tax and other revenues that may
be produced by these events before the matter is returned to the City Council.
ALTERNATIVES:
The City Council is not required to adopt this ordinance. In the absence of such adoption
staff must issue permits for such activity. Staff may impose conditions on such permits,
but staff will not be able to prevent the harmful activity from taking place. For this reason
staff does not recommend this alternative.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Urgency Ordinance
2. Draft Ordinance •
ITEM NUMBER: B- 1
DATE: 11/12/2002
•
DRAFT URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO
PERTAINING TO THE PROHIBITION OF OFF-SITE SALE OF
NEW AND USED AUTOMOBILES AND TRUCKS
PREAMBLE. Purpose and Intent
The City Council finds that the conduct of off-site sale of new and used automobiles and
trucks has created a public nuisance in the City of Atascadero. Such sales create sign
code violations, multiple noise violations and litter the streets with paper signs. All of this
activity adversely affects the health and welfare of the citizens of Atascadero. Such sales
are also known to lead to the use of unscrupulous sales tactics upon the citizens of
affected Cities. The City Council also finds that the adoption of this urgency ordinance
and a permanent ordinance to the same effect will promote appropriately located
commercial and industrial activities and preserve and strengthen the City's economic
base. The City recognizes a compelling interest in preserving the safety of the community
generally and providing a higher degree of protection for its citizens from the effects of
off-site sales of automobiles and trucks.
• NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Atascadero does ordain that sections
of the Atascadero Municipal Code are added to read as follows:
Section One:
4-3.103 Off-site sale of new and used automobiles and trucks is prohibited.
In all zone districts, the off-site sale of new and used automobiles and trucks is
unlawful. New and used automobile and truck sales must be conducted only at the
permanent property address in the City of Atascadero listed for the dealership on its
Department of Motor Vehicle Dealers license.
Section Two:
Severability.
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance is
for any reason deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any
court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portion of this ordinance. The City Council of the City of Atascadero hereby
declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence,
clause, phrase or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact any one or more sections,
subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases or other portions might subsequently be declared
invalid or unconstitutional.
UPJ
ITEM NUMBER: B- 1
DATE: 11/12/2002
The foregoing urgency ordinance was approved and adopted at a meeting of the •
City Council held on , 2002,by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ADOPTED:
CITY OF ATASCADERO
ATTEST:
Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk J. Michael Arrambide, Mayor
•
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney
U0!
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 11/12/2002
•
DRAFT ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO PERTAINING TO
THE PROHIBITION OF OFF-SITE SALE OF NEW AND USED
AUTOMOBILES AND TRUCKS
PREAMBLE. Purpose and Intent
The City Council finds that the conduct of off-site sale of new and used automobiles and
trucks has created a public nuisance in the City of Atascadero. Such sales create sign
code violations, multiple noise violations and litter the streets with paper signs. All of this
activity adversely affects the health and welfare of the citizens of Atascadero. Such sales
are also known to lead to the use of unscrupulous sales tactics upon the citizens of
affected Cities. The City Council also finds that the adoption of this urgency ordinance
and a permanent ordinance to the same effect will promote appropriately located
commercial and industrial activities and preserve and strengthen the City's economic
base. The City recognizes a compelling interest in preserving the safety of the community
• generally and providing a higher degree of protection for its citizens from the effects of
off-site sales of automobiles and trucks.
NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Atascadero does ordain that sections
of the Atascadero Municipal Code are added to read as follows:
Section One:
4-3.103 Off-site sale of new and used automobiles and trucks is prohibited.
In all zone districts, the off-site sale of new and used automobiles and trucks is
unlawful. New and used automobile and truck sales must be conducted only at the
permanent property address in the City of Atascadero listed for the dealership on its
Department of Motor Vehicle Dealers license.
Section Two:
Severability.
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance is
for any reason deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any
court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portion of this ordinance. The City Council of the City of Atascadero hereby
declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence,
is
clause, phrase or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact any one or more sections,
subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases or other portions might subsequently be declared
ITEM NUMBER: B- 1
DATE: 11/12/2002
invalid or unconstitutional. •
The foregoing urgency ordinance was approved and adopted at a meeting of the
City Council held on , 2002,by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ADOPTED:
CITY OF ATASCADERO
ATTEST:
Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk J. Michael Arrambide, Mayor
•
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney
•
ITEM NUMBER: B-2
DATE: 11/12/2002
j: 0;91 R:9
CAD��
Atascadero City Council
City Attorney Report
Veterans' Preference in Hiring
RECOMMENDATION:
Council introduce for first reading by title only, the draft Ordinance amending Section 2-2.07 of
the Atascadero Municipal Code to provide for a veterans' preference in hiring.
DISCUSSION:
Background: The State of California enacted legislation requiring all cities with a "civil service
• system" for the selection of employees to either adopt a preference system for veterans, or to
adopt a resolution stating the reasons why such a preference system will not be adopted by the
City. There is no clear definition of what a "civil service system" is. Atascadero does allow for
examinations in hiring, and does have a set of adopted personnel rules. We refer to our hiring
system as being competitive and not as a civil service system. Our personnel system does not
have many of the other attributes of a civil service commission. For instance, we do not have a
civil service commission. The City Attorney believes that we do not have a civil service system.
If this is true, then Atascadero need not adopt a preference system, and failing to do so, need not
adopt a resolution supporting such a decision.
That mere legal background is not sufficient to preclude the City Council from adopting a
veterans' preference ordinance. If the City Council feels that it is good policy to do so, it may
adopt such a preference even though it is not legally mandated.
Staff therefore recommends that a preference system for Veterans be adopted as presented. This
system would not require that a veteran be hired over a more qualified candidate, but it would
require the City to choose the veteran where all other qualifications were equal. There are other
methods available, such as adding points to an exam, but this one seems to be the simplest way
to give a fair preference to veterans.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
•
ITEM NUMBER: B-2
DATE: 11/12/2002
ALTERNATIVE: •
The City Council. may choose not to adopt such a system. Staff does not recommend this
alternative.
ATTACHMENT: Draft Ordinance
•
ITEM NUMBER: B-2
DATE: 11/12/2002
• DRAFT ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ATASCADERO AMENDING SECTION 4.20.190 OF THE ATASCADERO
MUNICIPAL CODE TO PROVIDE FOR A VETERANS' PREFERENCE IN
RECRUITMENT FOR EMPLOYMENT
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Section 2-2.07 of the Atascadero Municipal Code hereby is amended to
read as follows:
2-2.07 Appointments.
(a) Appointments to vacant positions in the competitive service shall be made in accordance
with the personnel rules or policies. Appointments and promotions shall be based on merit and
fitness to be ascertained so far as practicable by examination. Examinations may be used and
conducted to aid in the selection of qualified employees and shall consist of selection techniques
which will test fairly the qualifications of candidates, such as achievement and aptitude tests,
written tests, personal interviews, performance tests, physical agility tests, the evaluation of daily
work performance, work samples, or any combination of these or other tests. The probationary
period shall be considered an extension of, the examination process. Physical, medical,
• psychiatric and polygraph tests may be given as part of any examination.
(b) In any examination the Personnel Officer may include, in addition to competitive tests, a
qualifying test or tests and set the minimum standards therefore. Any tests or examinations used
for selection of personnel to fill a particular position must reflect the requirements of the position
for which the test is being administered.
(c) When an appointment is to be made to a vacancy in the competitive service, the Personnel
Officer shall transmit to the appointing authority the names of all persons on the appropriate
certified employment list in the order in which they appear on the list.
(d) Notwithstanding any of the provisions in the foregoing paragraphs, where all other
qualifications are equal, preference shall be granted to veterans in the selection of candidates to
fill the vacancy. As used in this section, "veteran" shall have the same meaning as under
Government Code Section 18973.
SECTION 2. This ordinance shall become effective on the thirtieth day following
passage and adoption hereof.
•
ITEM NUMBER: B-2
DATE: 11/12/2002
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO this
day of , 2002, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
APPROVED:
J. MICHAEL ARRAMBIDE, Mayor
ATTEST:
MARCIA MCCLURE TORGERSON, City Clerk •
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ROY A. HANLEY, City Attorney
•
�,�3