Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda Packet 10/22/2002
ITY OF C O TASCADERO -. 1918 1979 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA TUESDAY, October 22, 2002 7:00 P.M. City of Atascadero 6500 Palma Avenue, 4th Floor Atascadero, California REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: 6:30 P.M. REGULAR SESSION: 7:00 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Pro Tem Scalise ROLL CALL: Mayor Arrambide Mayor Pro Tem Scalise Council Member Clay Council Member Johnson Council Member Luna INTRODUCTIONS: APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Roll Call PRESENTATIONS: 1. Endorsement of Prop. 46 ■ Staff recommendation: Council approve the draft Resolution supporting The Housing and Emergency Shelter Trust Fund Act of 2002 — Proposition 46 on the November 5, 2002 statewide ballot. COMMUNITY FORUM: (This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wanting to address the Council on any matter not on this agenda and over which the Council has jurisdiction. Speakers are limited to five minutes. Please state your name and address for the record before making your presentation. The Council may take action to direct the staff to place a matter of business on a future agenda. A maximum of 30 minutes will be allowed for Community Forum, unless changed by the Council.) COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS: (On their own initiative, Council Members may make a brief announcement or a brief report on their own activities. Council Members may ask a question for clarification, make a referral to staff or take action to have staff place a matter of business on a future agenda. The Council may take action on items listed on the Agenda.) A. CONSENT CALENDAR: (All items on the consent calendar are considered to be routine and non-controversial by City staff and will be approved by one motion if no member of the Council or public wishes to comment or ask questions. If comment or discussion is desired by anyone, the item will be removed from the consent calendar and will be considered in the listed sequence with an opportunity for any member of the public to address the Council concerning the item before action is taken.) . 1. City Council Minutes — October 2, 2002 and October 8, 2002 ■ City Clerk recommendation: City Council approve the City Council minutes of October 2, 2002 and October 8, 2002. [City Clerk] 2. El Camino Real Bikelanes, Phases 2 and 3 ■ Fiscal impact: $263,710.00 (in FY 2002-2003 budget) • Staff recommendation: Council: 1. Approve Change Order Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 with a net amount of$21,256.80. 2. Authorize the Director of Administrative Services to appropriate $17,000 from the Local Transportation Fund for this project. 3. Accept Souza Construction, Inc.'s work as complete. 4. Authorize the City Manager to sign and file the Notice of Completion. [Public Works] B. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. Paloma Creek Park Playground Structure Replacement - California Integrated Waste Management Board Grant Funds Resolution • Fiscal impact: Approval of this resolution will allow the City to apply for up to $100,000 grant funding. If grant funding is authorized, the City would be required to make a matched contribution. ■ Staff recommendation: Council approve the draft Resolution authorizing the City Manager to apply for Grant Funds from the Park Playground Accessibility and Recycling Grant Program under the State of California's Waste Tire Track and Other Recreation Surfacing Grants Program for Fiscal Year 2002-2003. [Community Services] 2 • 2. Zone Change 2002-0028 / Conditional Use Permit 2002-0065 / Tentative Tract Map 2002-0016 (Tract 2489) — 1625, 1683, 1685 EI Camino Real (Kelly Gearhart/Wilson Land Surveys) ■ Fiscal impact: Slight negative impact on City revenues — Single-family dwellings require services that exceed the revenue generated by the dwelling. ■ Planning Commission recommendation: 1. Adopt draft Resolution A certifying the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration 2002- 0035; and, 2. Introduce for first reading by title only, the draft Ordinance A, for the creation of a new PD-17 overlay district; and, 3. Introduce for first reading by title only the draft Ordinance B approving Zone Change 2002-0028 rezoning the project site to RSF-X / PD-17 subject to a Master Plan of Development; and, 4. Adopt draft Resolution B approving Conditional Use Permit 2002-0065 for the Master Plan of Development subject to findings and conditions of approval; and, 5. Adopt draft Resolution C approving Tentative Tract Map 2002-0019, subject to findings and conditions of approval. [Community Development] C. MANAGEMENT REPORTS: 1. City Council Professional Development Reimbursement • Fiscal impact: None; future year impact could be as much as $46,462.20 ($15/month maximum increase in compensation for Council Members; $75/month allowance to offset City Council-related costs; and health insurance benefit coverage maximum cost of $41,062.20/year). ■ Staff recommendation: Council direct staff to prepare an Ordinance, which sets forth compensation, benefits and allowances for elected officials. [City Manager] D. COMMITTEE REPORTS: (The following represent standing committees. Informative status reports will be given, as felt necessary.): Mayor Arrambide 1. S.L.O. Council of Governments (SLOCOG)/S.L.O. Regional Transit Authority(SLORTA) 2. Water Committees 3. County Mayor's Round Table Mayor Pro Tem Scalise 1. Finance Committee 2. City/Schools Committee 3. Atascadero State Hospital Advisory Board 4. Economic Vitality Corporation, Board of Directors (EVC) Council Member Luna 1. Finance Committee 2. Integrated Waste Management Authority(IWMA) 3. North County Homeless Coalition Council Member Johnson 1. Local Agency Formation Commissions (LAFCO) 2. Water Committees 3 i Council Member Clay • 1. Air Pollution Control District(APCD) 2. City/Schools Committee E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION: 1. City Council 2. City Clerk 3. City Treasurer 4. City Attorney 5. City Manager F. ADJOURNMENT: Please note: Should anyone challenge any proposed development entitlement listed on this Agenda in court, that person may be limited to raising those issues addressed at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at or prior to this public hearing. Correspondence submitted at this public hearing will be distributed to the Council and available for review in the City Clerk's office. I, Marcia McClure Torgerson, the City Clerk of the City of Atascadero, declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing agenda for the October 22, 2002 Regular Session of the Atascadero City Council was posted on October 16, 2002 at Atascadero City Hall, 6500 Palma Ave., Atascadero, CA 93422 and was available for public review in the Customer Service Center at that location. • Signed this 16th day of October-2002 at Atascadero, California. Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk City of Atascadero t • 4 City of Atascadero WELCOME TO THE ATASCADERO CITY CO UNCIL MEETING • The City.Council meets in regular session on the second and fourth Tuesday of each month at 7:00 p.m., in the Council Chamber of City Hall. Matters are considered by the Council in the order of the printed Agenda. Copies of the staff reports or other documentation relating to each item of business referred to on the Agenda are on file in the office of the City Clerk(Room 311)and are available for public inspection during City Hall business hours at the Central Receptionist counter and on our website, www.atascadero.org. An agenda packet is also available for public review at the Atascadero Library, 6850 Morro Road. Contracts, Resolutions and Ordinances will be allocated a number once they are approved by the City Council. The minutes of this meeting will reflect these numbers. All documents submitted by the public during Council meetings that are either read into the record or referred to in their statement will be noted in the minutes and available for review in the City Clerk's office. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in a City meeting or other services offered by this City, please contact the City Manager's Office, (805) 461-5010, or the City Clerk's Office, (805) 461-5074. Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time when services are needed will assist the City staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting or service. TO SPEAK ON AGENDA ITEMS Members of the audience may speak on any item on the agenda. The Mayor will identify the subject, staff will give their report, and the Council will ask questions of staff. The Mayor will announce when the public comment period is open and will request anyone interested to address the Council regarding the matter being considered to • step up to the podium. If you wish to speak for,against or comment in any way: • You must approach the podium and be recognized by the Mayor • Give your name and address (not required) • Make your statement • All comments should be made to the Mayor and Council • All comments limited to 5 minutes (unless changed by the Council) • No one may speak for a second time until everyone wishing to speak has had an opportunity to do so, and no one may speak more than twice on any item. The Mayor will announce when the public comment period is closed, and thereafter, no further public comments will be heard by the Council. TO SPEAK ON SUBJECTS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA Under Agenda item, "COMMUNITY FORUM", the Mayor will call for anyone from the audience having business with the Council to: • PIease approach the podium and be recognized • Give your name and address(not required) • State the nature of your business This is the time items not on the Agenda may be brought to the Council's attention. A maximum of 30 minutes will be allowed for Community Forum(unless changed by the Council). • TO HAVE ITEMS PLACED ON AGENDA , All business matters to appear on the Agenda must be in the Office of the City Manager 14 days preceding the Council meeting. Should you have a matter you wish to bring before the Council, please mail or bring a written communication to the City Manager's office in City Hall prior to the deadline. 10/22/2002 i CA►DFg� Atascadero City Council Staff Report - City Manager's Office Endorsement of Proposition 46 RECOMMENDATION: Council approve the draft Resolution, supporting The Housing and Emergency Shelter Trust Fund Act of 2002 -Proposition 46 on the November 5, 2002 statewide ballot. DISCUSSION: • Attached to this report you will find a Memorandum in support of Prop 46 from David Mullinax, Regional Representative with the League of California Cities, Channel Counties. He explains in his memo the details of this proposition and why the League of California Cities is asking cities to join them in support of Prop. 46. ATTACHMENT: 1. Memorandum in support of Prop 46 and fact sheet, David Mullinax, League of California Cities 2. Draft Resolution i U01 MEMORANDUM Date: October 9,2002 • To: City Managers From: David Mullinax,Regional Representative League of California Cities, Channel Counties Re: Endorsement of Prop 46 Proposition 46,the Housing and Emergency Shelter Trust Fund Act of 2002 puts in place concrete solutions to an urgent problem all Californians face today. Working families are struggling to find apartments they can afford or homes they can buy. Teachers and public safety workers can't afford to live in the communities they serve. California is suffering a housing crisis that can longer be ignored. Proposition 46 provides affordable rental housing and homeownership assistance for seniors and working people. • One-third of all renters spend more than 50% of their income for housing. (30%is considered"affordable.") • More than 360,000 Californians are homeless on any single day. The most rapidly increasing segments of the homeless population are seniors and families • with children. • Proposition 46 allows low-income single mothers to raise their children in a safe environment. • Proposition 46 enables 78,000 California families to purchase their own home. • Proposition 46 will provide more than 22,000 permanently affordable rental units. Proposition 46 adheres to sound fiscal principles. • Proposition 46 is a$2.1 billion general obligation bond that will be paid through existing funds in the state general fund. Prop 46 does not authorize a new tax. • California's debt ratio is currently at 4.3%. Economists state a healthy debt ratio threshold is 5%or 6%.Even if all the bonds passed in November the debt ratio would only rise to 4.9% ➢ Interest rates are at historic lows, significantly reducing the cost of the bond. ➢ Proposition 46 provides that all bond funds are subject to an independent audit by the Bureau of State Audits. ➢ Proposition 46 funds programs that have a proven track record of success. ➢ Every city and county is eligible to receive funding under at least one of the programs in the bond. 602 • Proposition 46 will boost California's economy and stimulate the housing construction market. ➢ Finance$2.1 billion in affordable housing construction through a state bond. ➢ Create more than a quarter-million (276,000) good-paying jobs (approx$9.38 billion in wages) and helps the state remain economically competitive by providing more housing for workers. ➢ Create more than$40 billion in spending for home-related goods and services. ➢ Provide more than 22,750 permanently affordable rental units. Please join with League of California Cities,the California Chamber of Commerce,and many other senior organizations, business groups, labor unions,non-profit housing and homeless advocates, developers, educators, local governments and numerous charitable organizations and SUPPORT Prop. 46. 003 YE S On HOUSING & EMERGENCY SHELTER TRUST FUND ACT OF 2002 lath FACT SHEET To address California's dire need for affordable housing,a coalition of senior organizations, business groups, labor unions,nonprofit housing and homeless advocates,developers,educators,local governments and numerous charitable organizations have joined together to support the Housing and Emergency Shelter Trust Fund Act of 2002 on the November ballot. Wliat does the Housing& Emergency Shelter Trust Fund Act do? Finances$2.1 billion in affordable housing construction through a state bond: • $910 million for rental housing for low-income seniors, disabled persons,and families with children. • $495 million for homeownership programs,including sweat equity housing and down payment assistance for low and moderate-income families. • $390 million for emergency shelters and permanent housing with support services for homeless seniors,battered women,mentally ill people and veterans. • $200 million for farm worker housing(rental and ownership). • $100 million for incentives for local governments to approve housing developments. • $5 million for local code enforcement to revitalize neighborhoods. Why is this measure needed? To address California's growing housing crisis,housing construction must increase significantly to meet the demands of a growing population. The biggest gap in production is in affordable housing for lower income working families. As a result: • Over 360,000 Californians are homeless,according to the Department of Housing and Community Development.• The most rapidly increasing segments of the homeless population are seniors and families with children. • One-third of all renters,half of all low-income renters, and three-fourths of all very low income renters spend more than 50%of their income for housing. (30%is considered"affordable.") • Only 29%of Californians can afford the median priced home in the state,compared to 55%nationally. How will passage of this measure address California's housing crisis? • By creating or preserving more than 22,000 permanently affordable rental units. • By enabling more than 78,000 California families to purchase their own house. • By providing housing assistance for 7,000 to 8,500 farm worker families. • By creating 31,000 new domestic violence and homeless shelter beds. Where is the fiscal accountability? The measure includes provisions to ensure proper administration of the bond proceeds at both the state and local levels: • Bureau of State Audits will conduct audits to ensure that bond proceeds are awarded in a timely fashion and in compliance with the provisions set forth in the bond measure. • Oversight of administering the money to local community development agencies and nonprofit agencies by the Department of Housing and Community Development,with policing authority by the Bureau of State Audits. What other benefits will the measure generate for California? • New Investment: At least$13 billion in private investment and federal funds • Jobs: Approximately 276,002 full time jobs and$9.38 billion in wages • Spending: $25 billion in spending for home-related goods and services 926 J Street, Suite 1400 Sacramento, CA 95814 Phone: 916-447-0531 Paid for by Yes on 46, 1D#1244196 0 4 • Where is the fiscal accountability? The measure includes provisions to ensure proper administration of the bond proceeds at both the state and local levels: • Bureau of State Audits will conduct audits to ensure that bond proceeds are awarded in a timely fashion and in compliance with the provisions set forth in the bond measure. • Oversight of administering the money to local community development agencies and nonprofit agencies by the Department of Housing and Community Development,with policing authority by the Bureau of State Audits. What other benefits will the measure generate for California? • New Investment: At least $13 billion in private investment and federal funds • Jobs: Approximately 276,002 full time jobs and $9.38 billion in wages • Spending: $25 billion in spending for home-related goods and services • aYE 6on HOUSING & EMERGENCY SHELTER TRUST FUND ACT OF 2002 Allocation of Revenue $910 million: Multi family housing Rental housing for low-income seniors Rental housing for low-income disabled persons Rental housing for families with children Student housing Supportive services (job training, health services, child care) $495 million: Homeownership programs Sweat equity housing Down payment assistance for low- and moderate-income families Grants to making housing accessible to persons with disabilities. $390 million: Emergency shelters and permanent housing with support services for homeless seniors, battered women, mentally ill people, and veterans $200 million: Farmworker housing (rental and ownership) $100 million: Jobs Housing Improvement Account for incentives to local governments to approve housing developments. $5 million: Housing Rehabilitation Loan Fund for local code enforcement to revitalize neighborhoods. T • 926 JStreet, Suite 1400 Sacramento, CA 95814 Phone: 916-447-0531 Paid for by Yes on 46, ID#1244196 : HOUSING & EMERGENCY SHELTER YESon ® TRUST FUND ACT OF 2002 4FQ M, Yes, I will support your efforts! ❑ Please list me as a public supporter of the"Housing &Emergency Shelter Trust Fund Act of 2002" campaign on the November ballot. A coalition of senior organizations,business groups,nonprofit housing and homeless advocates, educators, developers,labor unions, local governments and numerous charitable organizations already have joined together to support this vital measure. It will provide emergency shelters for battered women,homeless seniors, veterans and the mentally ill and housing for moderate-to low-income working families, seniors, disabled persons, farm workers and many other Californians in need of quality affordable rental and ownership housing. The measure also includes specific provisions that provide for fiscal accountability at both the local and statewide levels from the Department of Housing and Community Development and the Bureau of State Audits. Please select a category: ❑ Organization ❑ Company ❑ Individual Please complete the following information: Company or Organization Name/Employer Name Title/Occupation • Mailing Address City State Zip County Phone Number Fax Number E-mail Address Signature(Required) Date I would like to receive e-mail updates on the Proposition 46 Campaign: ❑ Yes ❑ No I can also help in the following ways: ❑ Distribute material ❑ Send a letter to other potential supporters ❑ Volunteer/speak at local events ❑ Donate funds to the campaign ❑ Write a letter-to-the-editor ❑ Help raise funds for the campaign Let's join together to support this measure and make a difference in California's housing needs! Thank you for your immediate attention to this urgent m atter! lease fax this completed form to: Coalition for Housing & Emergency Shelter, (916) 443-3055 For more information,please call Justin Caporusso at(916) 443-3354 Campaign ID Number:1244196 www.prop46yes.org 607 DRAFT RESOLUTION • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF ATASCADERO IN SUPPORT OF THE HOUSING AND EMERGENCY SHELTER TRUST FUND ACT OF 2002 - PROPOSITION 46, ON THE NOVEMBER 5, 2002 STATEWIDE BALLOT WHEREAS, approximately 220,000 housing units need to be produced in California each year to meet demand; yet only four times in the last 20 years has the production target been reached; and WHEREAS, while the national homeownership rate has reached a record high, California is about 10 percent below the national average (67.8 percent) and ranks 48th in the nation; and WHEREAS, over one-third of all renter families statewide pay over half their incomes in rent; over one-half of all low-income renter families pay over half their income in rent; and almost three out of every four very low-income renter families pay over half their incomes in rent; and WHEREAS, the Department of Housing and Community Development estimates that there are over 360,000 homeless individuals in California, and other data discloses that one-third • of the homeless population, and the segment increasing most rapidly are families with children; and WHEREAS, there is an urgent need to provide affordable housing in to meet the increasingly unfulfilled housing needs of the state; and WHEREAS, there is an immediate need to reaffirm the commitment to the housing policy of the state and to help implement local housing programs by providing sufficient financial resources to do so over a reasonable period of time; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the members of the Atascadero City Council support the passage of the Housing and Emergency Shelter Trust Fund Act of 2002- Proposition 46, on the November 5, 2002 statewide ballot. On motion by Council Member and seconded by Council Member , the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety by the following roll call vote: City of Atascadero • Draft Resolution Page 2 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ADOPTED: By: J. Michael Arrambide, Mayor Attest: • Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk Approved as to form: Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney ITEM NUMBER: A-1 DATE: 10/22/2002 SPECIAL MEETING ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL Wednesday, October 2, 2002 5:00 p.m. PLANNING COMMISSION INTERVIEWS AND APPOINTMENT INTERVIEWS AND APPOINTMENTS: Mayor Arrambide called the meeting to order at 3:30 p.m. ROLL CALL: • Present: Council Members Clay, Johnson, Luna, Scalise and Mayor Arrambide Absent: None Others Present: City Clerk Marcia McClure Torgerson PUBLIC COMMENT: None INTERVIEWS AND APPOINTMENT: 1. Planning Commission ■ City Clerk recommendation: Council interview the ten candidates and select, by ballot, one citizen to serve on the Planning Commission. The Council interviewed the nine candidates and appointed Greg Porter to fill the vacancy that will expire in February 2005. ADJOURNMENT: Mayor Arrambide adjourned the Interview Session at 8:1Op.m. 010 ITEM NUMBER: A-1 DATE: 10/22/2002 a B;•. .IB � • CITY OF A TASCADERO CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES TUESDAY, October 8, 2002 7:00 P.M. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: 6:30 P.M. REGULAR SESSION: 7:00 P.M. Mayor Arrambide called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. and led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL: Present: Council Members Clay, Johnson, Luna, Scalise and Mayor Arrambide Absent: None Others Present: City Clerk Marcia McClure Torgerson and City Treasurer David Graham. Staff Present: City Manager Wade McKinney, Assistant City Manager Brady Cherry, Administrative Services Director Rachelle Rickard, Community Development Director Warren Frace, Public Works Director Steve Kahn, Deputy Community Services Director Geoff English, Police Chief Dennis Hegwood, Fire Chief Kurt Stone and City Attorney Roy Hanley. f • CC 10/08/02 F; Page 1 o ITEM NUMBER: A-1 DATE: 10/22/2002 APPROVAL OF AGENDA: MOTION: By Council Member Luna and seconded by Council Member Johnson to approve the agenda. Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. PRESENTATIONS: 1. Proclamation declaring October 10, 2002 as "Lights on After School Day." Mayor Arrambide read the proclamation and presented it to Lisa Barr. COMMUNITY FORUM: Daphne Fahsing asked the Council to continue to have the City Clerk attach documents to the Agendas and Minutes at the Library. Preacher Prayer Joe Porter, National Association of Prayer, requested the City Council prepare a proclamation for a statewide prayer day, similar to those by other City Councils around the country, as included in a packet he presented to Council. • David Broadwater, 6604 Portola Road, spoke to the Council about Colony Days . "American Heroes." He explained that he applied for a booth in the Sunken Gardens on Colony Days and was denied because the speech he might make would be too controversial. He asked the Council to direct the Colony Days Committee to allow him to rent a booth. Mayor Arrambide closed the Community Forum period. COUNCIL. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS: Mayor Arrambide introduced new Planning Commissioner Greg Porter. Council Member Johnson asked staff to look into the issue of reimbursement of expenses for Council Members. Council Member Luna asked the City Attorney to explain what the parameters were for Council action on Mr. Broadwater's request. City Attorney Hanley explained that there was not much Council could do, as the Colony Days Committee and not the City of Atascadero put on Colony Days. Under those circumstances the United States Supreme Court has ruled that the event is for the purposes of their speech, not everybody's speech. CC 10/08/02 Page 2 ITEM NUMBER: A-1 DATE: 10/22/2002 Council Member Luna asked staff about the asphalt grinding being collected at the Lake Park and expressed his concern that anything done there should be consistent with the Lake Park Master Plan. Public Works Director Kahn indicated that the Lake Park Master Plan will be followed and a plan is being submitted to the Community Development Department for environmental review. Council Member Clay reported on the League of Cities Conference in Long Beach, which he had attended. A. CONSENT CALENDAR: 1. City Council Minutes — September 24, 2002 • City Clerk recommendation: City Council approve the City Council minutes of September 24, 2002. [City Clerk] 2. City Treasurer's Report—June and July 2002 ■ Fiscal impact: None ■ City Treasurer recommendation: City Council approve the City Treasurer's report for June and July 2002. [City Treasurer] 3. Final Parcel Map - 2002-0034 (Parcel Map AT 02-0060) — [TPM 2001-0022] 7500 San Palo Ave. (Sparling) ■ Fiscal impact: None. Staff recommendation: Council accept Final Parcel Map 2002-0034 (Parcel Map AT 02- • 0060) [Public Works] 4. Final Tract Map - 2002-0042 (Tract Map 2444) — [TTM 2001-0008] 9385 Musselman Ave. (Shores) ■ Fiscal impact: None. ■ Staff recommendation: Council: 1. Accept Final Tract Map 2002-0042 (Tract Map 2444) 2. Accept offer of dedication for streets and public utility easement on Musselman 3. Authorize the City Manager to execute a Subdivision Improvement Agreement [Public Works] 5. Agreement with San Luis Ambulance Services, Inc. — First-Response Emergency Medical Services ■ Fiscal impact: $83,250_ annual revenue, increased annually (not to exceed total maximum increase of 5%). ■ Staff recommendation: Council authorize the City Manager to execute a contract with San Luis Ambulance Services, Inc., authorizing them to bill persons for first-response emergency medical services provided by the Fire Department. [Fire] MOTION: By Council Member Johnson and seconded by Council Member Luna to approve the Consent Calendar. Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. (item #A.4. Contract No. 2002-020, Item #A.S. Contract No. 2002-029) t • CC 10/08/02 G 13 Page 3 ITEM NUMBER: A- 1 DATE: 10/22/2002 • B. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. Zone Change 2002-0029 / Conditional Use Permit 2002-0067 - Vesting Tentative Tract Map 2002-0014 (Tract 2454), 2000 Ferrocarril Road (Gearhart /Wilson) • Fiscal impact: Slight negative impact on City revenues — Single-family dwellings require services that exceed the revenue generated by the dwelling. • Planning Commission recommendation: Council: 1. Adopt draft Resolution A, to certify the proposed Mitigation Negative Declaration 2002- 0030; and, 2. Introduce for first reading by title only, the draft Ordinance approving Zone Change 2002- 0029; and, 3. Adopt draft Resolution B, approving Conditional Use Permit 2002-0067 for the Master Plan of Development subject to findings and conditions of approval; and, 4. Adopt draft Resolution C, approving Vesting Tentative Tract Map 2002-0014, subject to findings and conditions of approval. [Community Development] Community Development Director Warren Frace gave the staff report and with Public Works Director Steve Kahn answered questions of Council. PUBLIC COMMENT Russ Thompson, R. Thompson Consulting, representing Kelly Gearhart, stated that they concur with the Planning Commission's review and approval and reminded Council that they are asking for phased approval of this project. Mr. Thompson answered questions of Council Myra Douglass, 8005 EI Retiro Avenue, commented on the trails portion of this project. She thanked the owner and staff for including the trail plans in the project. She expressed concerns regarding residents planting along or blocking the trail limiting its use, and she would like to see the trail well defined and designated for multiple uses. Gary Reichard, 955 Templeton Road, Templeton, expressed his concerns in a prepared statement. He told the Council there is hazardous waste on this property that is contaminating the Salinas River and this property is vulnerable to flooding. (Exhibit A) Kelly Gearhart, applicant, discussed the wells in question, stated that they do not effect this project and indicated that they are being addressed by Environmental Health. He also stated that as soon as the bridge permit is issued he would begin on construction of the bridge. Mr. Gearhart answered questions of the Council. Mayor Arrambide closed the Public Comment period. CC 10/08/02 614 Page 4 ITEM NUMBER: A- 1 DATE: 10/22/2002 MOTION: By Council Member Johnson and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Scalise to adopt draft Resolution A, to certify the proposed • Mitigation Negative Declaration 2002-0030. Motion passed 4:1 by a roll-call vote. (Luna opposed) (Resolution No. 2002-049) MOTION: By Council Member Johnson and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Scalise to introduce for first reading by title only, the draft Ordinance approving Zone Change 2002-0029. Motion passed 4:1 by a roll-call vote. (Luna opposed) MOTION: By Council Member Johnson and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Scalise to adopt draft Resolution B, approving Conditional Use Permit 2002-0067 for the Master Plan of Development subject to findings and conditions of approval and amending Conditions No. 23. and 24. C. to change the setbacks to 145 feet. Motion passed 4:1 by a roll-call vote. (Luna opposed) (Resolution No. 2002-042) MOTION: By Council Member Johnson and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Scalise to adopt draft Resolution C, approving Vesting Tentative Tract Map 2002-0014, subject to findings and conditions of approval including the addition of the following • statement to Tract Map Condition No. 42.: "The access easements for the road and bridges must be recorded prior to or concurrently with the final map," and amending Conditions No. 26. and 27.A. to change the setbacks to 145 feet, and adding clarifying language to "notify the owners that private wells are subject to failure." Motion passed 4:1 by a roll-call vote. (Luna opposed) (Resolution No. 2002-043) C. MANAGEMENT REPORTS: 1. Recruit Police Officer • Fiscal impact: $16,300 for salary and academy material costs per applicant (in FY 2001-03 budget). ■ Staff recommendation: Council authorize establishment of the position of Police Officer — Recruit. [City Manager] City Manager Wade McKinney gave the staff report and answered questions of Council. 0 CC 10/08/02 ��5 Page 5 ITEM NUMBER: A- 1 DATE: 10/22/2002 • PUBLIC COMMENT Becky Pacas, shared with the Council recent events involving her son being harassed and beaten by other teens. She expressed concern about not being notified immediately that her son had been injured, she feels the Police Department does not have enough time or resources to handle all calls received. Mayor Arrambide closed the Public Comment period. Mayor Arrambide stated his concern that the language under the second paragraph of Fiscal Impact is permissive and he would like to see that language firmed up. MOTION: By Council Member Clay and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Scalise to authorize establishment of the position of Recruit Police Officer. Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. Mayor Arrambide recessed the hearing at 9:05 p.m. Mayor Arrambide called the meeting back to order at 9:12 p.m. 2. State of California Regional Housinq Needs Allocation Fiscal impact: Consistent with General Plan 2025. ■ Staff recommendation: Council: 1. Take a position in support of San Luis Obispo County's Regional Housing Needs Allocation of 18_,035 units from 2001-2008, with a City of Atascadero share being 218 units annually. 2. Take a position in support of San Luis Obispo Council of Governments' (SLOCOG) adopted population-based housing allocation formula. [Community Development] City Manager Wade McKinney gave the staff report and answered questions of Council. There was lengthy discussion on this item. PUBLIC COMMENT— None Council Member Johnson stated that though he does not like what the State has imposed, he would support the allocation and a super vote so that Atascadero would not be involved in an expensive lawsuit in the future. Mayor Arrambide agreed with Council Member Johnson regarding the State dictating to the cities, however, he feels the issue of affordable housing has been largely ignored in Atascadero and the community needs to be more balanced to meet the needs of all income levels. Council Member Clay reiterated Mayor Arrambide's contention that the City has a moral • obligation to provide housing for all levels; he feels that the younger members of the community need to be represented with housing they can afford. CC 10/08/02 e Page 6 u El ITEM NUMBER: A- 1 DATE: 10/22/2002 Council Member Luna felt that one of the problems in Atascadero is that there is no • affordable housing because it has never been requested. He feels it is time that the Planning Commission and City Council work toward seeing that affordable housing is provided when projects come forward. Council Member Luna suggested that it is time to bring all of the COG's together to produce a statewide initiative to protect local control on such issues. Mayor Pro Tem Scalise felt it was time to step back and look at why there is no affordable housing in Atascadero. She feels the reason more affordable housing is not produced is because of all the environmental requirements built in at the local level such as open space and quality of life issues. MOTION: By Council Member Johnson and seconded by Council Member Luna to: 1. Take a position in support of the Regional Housing Needs Allocation of 18,035 units from 2001-2008, with a City of Atascadero share being 218 units annually, and, 2. Take a position in support of San Luis Obispo Council of Governments' (SLOCOG) adopted population-based housing allocation formula, and, 3. Direct staff to immediately enter into an effort to start an • initiative process, working with the League of California Cities to protect local control. Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. 3. Amendment to Solid Waste Collection Franchise Agreement — Automated Green Waste and Recyclable Collection • Fiscal impact: $2.62 increase in current rate to the customer • Staff recommendation: Council approve Amendment Number Two to the Solid Waste Collection Franchise Agreement. [Public Works] Public Works Director Steve Kahn gave the staff report and answered questions of Council. Mr. Kahn introduced Bill Worrell, Manager of the San Luis Obispo Integrated Waste Management Authority (IWMA). Bill Worrell, IWMA, gave the Council an overview on the proposed program. PUBLIC COMMENT Pat Higgins, Atascadero Waste, reviewed the process they have followed to date and complimented his committee for an excellent job on this item. CC 10/08/02 17 Page 7 ITEM NUMBER: A- 1 DATE: 10/22/2002 • Council Member Clay asked if the rate increase notices could be written in language that would be easy to understand, and if the form for those interested in opting out of green waste recycling could be included. Mr. Higgins stated that this would be done. Mayor Arrambide closed the Public Comment period. MOTION: By Mayor Pro Tem Scalise and seconded by Council Member Johnson to adopt Amendment Number Two to the Solid Waste Collection Franchise Agreement. Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. 4. Information Bulletin a. Chamber's Activities and Programs- May through August, 2002 D. COMMITTEE REPORTS: - None E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION: City Council Council Member Johnson encouraged the Mayor to control the electioneering from the platform if it does not apply to the topic at hand. Council Member Luna expressed interest in determining what the listening audience for KPRL's broadcast of the Council meeting would be. City Manager City Manager McKinney reported the City has been seeking another health insurance provider to take the place of Lifeguard. There will be an open enrollment period next week for the Blue Cross Company with a 44% increase to the City for health insurance benefits. Information on Proposition 46 has been provided in Council packets for comments or placement on a future agenda. Regarding Council compensation and reimbursement for meeting and travel expenses, Mr. McKinney asked if there was consensus to bring this issue back—there was Council consensus to do so. Mr. McKinney asked for Council direction regarding policy for meeting minutes. Mayor Arrambide stated that the request was for a complete packet to be made available at • the Library. The City Clerk stated that Council had voted to not attach documents CC 10/08/02 U 18 Page 8 ITEM NUMBER: A-1 DATE: 10/22/2002 submitted in the course of a Council meeting to the Minutes, but rather to have them available for review in the City Clerk's office. • F. ADJOURNMENT: Mayor Arrambide adjourned the meeting at 10:25 p.m. to the next regularly scheduled meeting on October 22, 2002. MEETING RECORDED AND MINUTES PREPARED BY: Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk The following exhibits are available for review in the City Clerk's office. Exhibit A— Gary Reichard 1 • CC 10/08/02 Page 9 0 1 i ITEM NUMBER: A-2 DATE: 10/22/2002 1915„ .979---- Atascadero City Council Staff Report - Public Works Department El Camino Real Bikelanes, Phases 2 and 3 RECOMMENDATIONS: Council: 1. Approve Change Order Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 with a net amount of$21,256.80. • 2. Authorize the Director of Administrative Services to appropriate $17,000 from the Local Transportation Fund for this project. 3) Accept Souza Construction, Inc.'s work as complete. 4) Authorize the City Manager to sign and file the Notice of Completion. DISCUSSION: On February 12, 2002, Council authorized the execution of a contract with Souza Construction, Inc. in the amount of$142,286 to construct the El Camino Real Bikelanes Phases 2 and 3 Project. The project consisted of widening of roadway shoulder, drainage facilities, signing and striping on El Camino Real between Jornada and Santa Barbara (4,500 feet), and between Del Rio and San Anselmo (4,600 feet). Construction began on May 13, 2002 and was completed on July 23, 2002. Contract Change Orders No. 1 & 2 totaling$28,457.20 were previously approved in accordance with the purchasing policy. Change Orders Nos. 3 through 7 with a net amount of$21,256.80 have been prepared and approval is requested at this time. These change orders bring the total contract price to $192,000.00. The change orders were for added base and paving, drainage • improvements and a tree trimming. - _ 020 ITEM NUMBER: A-2 DATE: 10/22/2002 The City Engineer has reviewed the completed improvements by Souza Construction, Inc. and has found them to be in substantial conformance with the project plans and specifications. • FISCAL IMPACT: Estimated Total Project Costs are as follows: PROJECT FUNDING Local Transportation Fund 51,710.00 RSHA 85,000.00 USHA 15,000.00 TEA 112,000.00 Total Project Fundin 263,710.00 PROJECT EXPENDITURES Plans, Specifications and Estimates(PS&E) 45,520.00 Construction 192,000.00 Contract Administration, Construction Engineering and Ins ection 26,190.00 Total Project Expenditures 263,710.00 • ATTACHMENTS: Contract Change Order Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 Final Pay Estimate Notice of Completion 621 ° CITY OF ATASCADERO • 19i� 19?9 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 6500 PALMA AVENUE,ATASCADERO,CA 93422 Telephone:(805)461-5020 • Fay(805)461-7615 CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER No.: CCO-03 Project. EI Camino Real Bikelanes, Phases 2 and 3 Bid No.: 2000-05 Date of Issuance: October 9, 2002 Contractor., Souza Construction, Inc. You are hereby directed to make the following changes in the Contract Documents. Revise the contract documents per Attachment A Purpose of Change Order: Extra Work Item added to contract. Attachments: Attachment A- Change Order Itemization CHANGE IN CONTRACT PRICE: CHANGE IN CONTRACT TIME: Original Contract Price Original Contract Time $142,286.00 40 working days • Previous Change Orders Net Change from previous Change Orders CCO#1 $500.00 0 working days CCO#2 $0.00 0 working days $500.00 Contract Price prior to this Change Order Contract Time prior to this Change Order $142,786.00 40 working days Net Increase of this Change Order Net Increase(Decrease)of this Change Order $5,262.60 0 working days New Contract Price(Includes Change Order Contract Time with all approved Change Orders Nos. 1 and 2) $148,048.60 40 working days Recommended by: Approved by: Accepted by: Souza Construction, Inc. Steven B. Kahn Wade G. McKinney (signature) Public Works Director City Manager • (printed name) C:\DOCUME—l%skahn\LOCALS-11Temp1CCO#3.doc Pagel of 2 - S ' l 22 CITY OF ATASCADERO ai 1979 . DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS • 6500 PALMA AVENUE,ATASCADERO, CA 93422 Telephone:(805)461-5020 ' Fa)c(805)461-7615 ATTACHMENT A CHANGE ORDER NO. CCO-03 EL CAMINO REAL BIKELANES, PHASES 2 AND 3 BID NO. 2000-05 It is mutually agreed by and between the City and the Contractor that the following changes are hereby made to the contract documents,special provisions and plans. Numbers in parenthesis designate a reduction on the contract price. 1. EXTRA WORK ADDED TO CONTRACT: Location: Mini-Mart Removal of unsuitable material (1-foot deep),and replacement with Class 2 Base on south EI Camino Real. (Souza's request,including breakdown of costs,is attached). NET INCREASE THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ ; • Accepted by Souza Construction, Inc. (signature) (date) (printed name) C:\DOCUME-1\skahn\LOCALS-1\Temp\CCO#3.doc Page 2 of 2 - 023 -_ .,.,..,..: ��.•.;�:.���lu:� 121002:003 id �'77tACT1�t" May 17,2002 City of Atascadero Departmeat of Public Worms 6500 Palma Avenue Aiascadero,CA 93422 A`= Steve Mahn Re: El C=nino Real Eike Lanz Projc D=r Mr_Kahn: As regeested I am providing you u h a cc _�1--Ov=uasu?eolc ma:, vial at 1'dee ane r lace witH cInss 2 base on south El Cam i_o Rte? +,Ile abcve Tr_ td p � 6ntion. prcjec=� A. per a:tac�.nt "A"ora cost to do this wor'z is 55,262.60. i as i:wl ids cut the s at 1'd-- -p off tls�n:t Tial,aad repla�W it k ` class 2 hasa up to or P m2� ,anal St.a�de level. IZ you 1;3vS any questions please do not ars==to Cap me, Thank Yoe f Matt�renard Project Ivlat SO=constracfian,Inc. Gcr�'Exrmix Ccrr� Q B�3303 • dins v�.�:��c Sen Lv's Oa sao,CA 33403 11S�.r�;,�',DATAV48S\421.O19kco T 5 moi:�5-8288 Fzt:Ki/5d 8-82877 MAY-17-2002, 09:23 805 546 8237 P.02 U94 • X1003/006 Souza Construction, Inc. - 010426C Afas.Bike Lane Unsuitable 05/17/2002 7:52 ES T I[viATE REt^AP- BID QUANTITtcS Labor DIRECT INDIRECT TOTAL % Ot=TOTAL 7..9.38 Burden799.38 17,8% Lab-Bur 1,310.8899 511. $11.51 11.4% . Perm Matt 1,310.89 29.2% Const Exp 1,700.00 0.0% Equipment 1,472.00 1,700.00 87.9 ° Subs 1,472.00 32.8% Other 0.0% 0.0°a Total Costs: 4,'.32.89 %of Total 160.00°!00 4.482.89 0.00% 100.00% Date Below nsre is dz-pandent on the Summary Procass.• The Summary Pr=- s WW last run 05/1712002 at 7:52 Markup on Detail Costs CCSt Addons 737.98 16.5% GL,Difference from Default %of TL 0.00 0.0% Bond from Summary Table 41.57 0.9% MARKUP,ADDON&BOND T OiALS-? 7i9.5So 17.4.6 • COST T MARKUP ------_y (%of costs) $5,262.44 (On Takeoff Quantity) There" ARE NOT *closing acc;urts�r+;`s bid. Rounding difference: -cr;ect on Sid- Unbalancing d'r:'ferenca: 0.16 Adjusted From Cut&Add Sheet-=sts: From Cut&Add Sheet-markup: (on Bid ouantity) (on Bid Quantity) Net Adjustments(to the balanced bid): $0.1v [or desired bid] BALANCED BID TOTAL $5,262.44 DESIRED BID(if speciffed) BID TOTAL (on bid quantities) $5,262.60 BID COSTS (on bid quan5ties) MARKUP (on bid quantities) $4,524.46 1388.14.14 - $ 16.31% EXPECTED JOB VALUE(on takeoff quantlties: EXPECTED COSTS (on taker,;;quan5`;es): .-- S,524.46 EXPECTED MARKUP (on takeoff quanHes): - x±738.14 15.31 Adjust to Bid Quantities= Y . NAY-17-2002 07:04 603 546 622'? P.03 c's LL UU4/006 Souza Construction, Inc. 05/17/2002 7:52 010425C Alas. Bike Lane Unsuitable Report Variation= QUICK-DETAIL • On i akeori Q�.;_nuties Labor Hrs. (MH/MKS) 32 p 3� �lJ U/t_�S 0 0 4 (incl burden) 1,311 0 1,311 `J Labor(DAY/DAYS) 0 0 0 (incl burden) 0 0 0 Labor(OtherUnits) . 0 0 0 (incl burden) Labor Burden 512 0 512 Spread Indirects on: i otalLessSub Spread Markup on: Markup% Spread Addons&Bond on: Tot_lLeF ub Markup on: Labor Burden per m, CM CoEgP Ren±rdEgP 20.0% 20.0% 1 c.0°5 15.0% 15.0% 15.0% EOE Sub 15.0% 15.0% B=ond Table: > 2.500,000.00 =_> 7.9 ; > 2,5-D3,000.00 =_> 6.5 � > 0.00 =-> (Rale-Per 1000) > 0.00 =_> 0. ' 0 =>> 0.00 =_> 0 > O.CuO • —ESTIMATE NOTES: Bid Date: Owner: Engr Firm: Estimator-In-Charge: sired Bid(r sp�i�ied}= r0 40 Notes: • 2 ' MAY-17-2002 07:04 605 545 5237 P.04 + V U X05/006 N ' q ..ti =� O COmm 'r NtO IO ^CO F� N `t�P" oomv o NCOOm�u�oom CD N CO NNN� ^QLO�LO 0/000 r- .0 • N LO t� 0 0 V o 0 c c a� �q • S n u0 = c m - rm e} Ga� n N C 4 CO T CO LO to b co m = _ V'C o r p _ C N N 7 m S Rrn 1L O N q U $ o 0 . V m � N N Q O _ C) 001,5 cz O M, Cr O O G to U c` c m L' CO TV'n b - . i4 tD to 4 d 6 NCL Ncr hp F o M O a u ~ in ., F•, C o c 4 0 Oo O rn JOO 000 O 0.0 u, .00 D LUSU S 0.0 D�$pC�cnw C00000=,=C) w n Lar ccoa.: ��ac �oceai$nn O o M 1,7 '"'n,-cvn etiod�ricocioeieaeSr`^i . _ 0 N r K7NN 4 C'7rNN'Nu .M-.• 0 O GS N N Y Z .s`c OCCLL^L'C' 2 i r 3 U i-SSTSSS�C.SrS.�. ? tJ� i CC�t1 CbOq Cc: 0. _�N �DCOOC�^.C"I J )00 U000 GOOpbbo O �••O L1 CO CV C7 CC 7 n C R N O O D O O O O O O O D O O G7 O NOON CV NCV NCV CVNNSt CL y„�N V d 0 C 0 a GC0C GGC W Q Cd 6Cb 5 �. . � Liles c w00 OCC70000 - CV Q CO C c J= = JW vE o ea'Q` tm LLIC9 c _o U x y 0:0 a a m A C3 cEO ex � O c ^ �V O{� ncy x w o a0 Z c p r e c c`z 10F tlQ c• c � c� CQvUU ©G� 4 ate: � = coC� 53 m aw�u U 6�Cc n @mt�- �c�+wX' .' 2m ",n C3 0 d = -j�t� �Cc`O -�-, < aC9cliW otrC,-r�-'y� D`�mr o o c OmOCCUo =toca v U;Fw-� 03.ufa a� `o o` 23 •- xci > T C�7=scS © c `n Uaa? �� a�l=og :° mER4em� Ca a n CCW-i c,c°-.; opo Comnt�uU�U a; 0 ELm +s a � 44 u o Z a W ti U C O- U rn 2 E V Cj g 2 O m Ca,-; O I._1 J`-M. N C7 0 fl t-,, ,-o ay to -Ct) a oc •5❑ y! s 4.❑ =fit OCC^_ S pU NnNn,� ZpCuwiuw.i�� p n v U3 O s*y m n r M g 4 a q ti'L 5/..N Uo UI C.7 W NQ m d m<O_]Q Q M 11 CO r o TV C h k A f • MAY-17-2002 07:04 805 545 8287 P.05 027 • X1006/006 N ' tp � (V fti G A N ~ • b 921 O d N O � N e • $0 Q6 LU O c g E E E m, to C� L c o� � q • �m a.m O � r i O q X T OL p° _ iQ a ' F. •c y O a Q q ?. CJ v s x ` � x o O n w c 4 R ri o C1 3.n° m m�.2 ;o m ai ;3 S O 6 m G .2—. bra wa m m aw� y c .9 X cU`� a = O v, o r Q' V X c e �,e= m •� L b� C7 _eLU r do � � o 5 O a '' a>. Gm �LOu v Z CD =1 1 0-5 e¢ 06Q311 �WiQ ED to LZ — a mID s Z. zo� 0 L O� 42� to n+m aoc m Q 9aRp a— 1 L .0 tl� .._ti • t MAY-17-2002 07=05 605 546 6?37 P.06 CITY OF ATASCADERO R JIM: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS iir�s: 6500 PALMA AVENUE,ATASCADERO,CA 93422 C&D Telephone:(805)461-5020 • Pax(805)461-7615 CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER No.: CCO-04 Project.• EI Camino Real Bikelanes, Phases 2 and 3 Bid No.: 2000-05 Date of Issuance: October 9, 2002 Contractor., Souza Construction, Inc. You are hereby directed to make the following changes in the Contract Documents. Revise the contract documents per Attachment A Purpose of Change Order: Extra Work Item added to contract. Attachments: Attachment A- Change Order Itemization CHANGE IN CONTRACT PRICE: CHANGE IN CONTRACT TIME: Original Contract Price Original Contract Time $142,286.00 40 working days Previous Change Orders Net Change from previous Change Orders CCO#1 $500.00 0 working days CCO#2" $0.00 0 working days CCO#3 $5,262.60 0 working days $5,762.60 Contract Price prior to this Change Order Contract Time prior to this Change Order $148,048.60 40 working days Net Increase of this Change Order Net Increase(Decrease)of this Change Order $3,684.60 0 working days Contract Price with Contract Time with all approved Change Orders Change Orders 1 through 3: $151,733.20 40 working days Recommended by: Approved by: Accepted Souza by: Inc. Steven B. Kahn Wade G. McKinney (signature) Public Works Director City Manager (printed name T • C:\DOCUME-1\skahn\LOCALS-1\Temp\CCO#4.doc Page 1 of 2 U � ° CITY OF ATASCADERO R. ® 11 Eli 1979- DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 6500 PALMA AVENUE,ATASCADERO,CA 93422 Telephone:(805)461-5020 • Fac(805)461-7615 ATTACHMENT A CHANGE ORDER NO. CCO-04 EL CAMINO REAL BIKELANES, PHASES 2 AND 3 BID NO. 2000-05 It mutually agreed by and between the City and the Contractor that the following changes are hereby made to the contract documents,special provisions and plans. Numbers in parenthesis designate a reduction on the contract price. I. EXTRA WORK ADDED TO CONTRACT: SUPPLEMENTAL WORK(AT CHURCH): Removal of unsuitable material (1-foot deep), and replacement with Class 2 Base on south EI Camino Real. (Souza's request,including breakdown of costs,is attached). NET INCREASE THIS CHANGE ORDER: • Accepted by Souza Construction, Inc. (signature) (date) (printed name) C-\DOCUME-1\skahn\LOCAI.s--1\Temp\CCO#4.doc Page 2 of 2 ��a 1UE 10:36 FAX 805 546 8287 SOUZA CONSTRUCTION (UU3 .•Zy AC May 24,2002 City of Atascadero Department of Public Works 6500 Palma Avenue Atasc:adero,CA 93422 Attn: Steve Kahn Re: El Camino Real Bike Lane Project,Phase 11&III aF/24 20^^ '77 Dear Mr.Kahn: As requested I am providing you with the remaming cost emb*r u bie material at 10" deep and replace v6th class 2 base on sou Camino Real,by the church r the above mentioned project. As per attachment"A"our r ing e a work is 33,684.60. Including gutting out the section at 10"deep,hauling off the material,placing filter fabric and placing class 2 base up to original subgade level. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to call me. Thank You. Sincerely, , Matt lionard Project Manager Please nob our riew' -rnaiiing:address:, ; ' San Luis obi'spo,•GA,t3`d gxnl0 • F:\AATAUOB5102pOMcca umuitable mtlesrii2,do-.do-.,,,,,,,4,_,2,8 Fax 805/546-6207 X31 UD/-'0/2UO2 TUE 10:38 FAX 805 548 8287 SOUZA CONSTRUCTION X1004/O�; C3 CD rq coo Cm 'a cD to m 6 • A rr it 'c u u U m " � o 05/23 ? .• . co T^or/00e U L K►! D J F e- m . W L C9 z C N � a 1 � °• CZC) &32 Uu/',6/2UU2 TUE 10:37 F_4% 805 546 8287 SOULk CONSTRUCTION X1005/Ulii Souza Construction, Inc. 05/24/2002 13:06 010426D UNSUITABLE 02 ESTIMATE RECAP- BID QUANTITIES DIRECT INDIRECT TOTAL %OF TOTAL Labor 873.60 873.60 27.5% Burden 548,85 548.85 17.3% Lab+Bur 1,422.45 1,422.45 44.8% Perm Matl 0.0% Const Exp 500.00 500.00 15.7% Equipment 1,255.00 1,256.00 39.5°x6 Subs Other 0,00 0.0% Total Costs: 3,178.45 3,178.45 100.0% %of Total 100.00% 0.00% 100.00'/° 0 F/2 S.., 1 777 '" *Data Below here is dependent on the Summary Process. 7 The Summary Process was last run 0512412002 at 13:5 Markup on Detail Costs 476.77 15.0% Cost Addons GL;Difference from Default %of TL 0.00 0.0% Bond from Summary Table 29.10 0.9% MARKUP, ADDON&BOND TOTALS=_ > 505.87 15.9% • COST+MARKUP --------: ------ (%of costs) $3,684.32 (On Takeoff Quantity) There' ARE NOT F closing accounts for this bid. Rounding difference: -Effect on Bid- 0.28 Adjusted Unbalancing difference: From Cut&Add Sheet-costs: (on Bid Quantity) From Cut&Add Sheet-markup: (on Bid Quantity) Net Adjustments(to the balanced bid): $0.28 (or desired bid] - BALANCED BID TOTAL $3,684.32 DESIRED BID(if specified) BID TOTAL (on bid quantities) $3,684,60 BID COSTS(on bid quantities) $3,207.55 MARKUP (on bid quantities) $477.05 14.$7% EXPECTED J013 VALUE(on takeoff quantities) $3,684.60 EXPECTED COSTS (on takeoff quantities): $3,207.55 EXPECTED MARKUP (on takeoff quantities): 7.05 14.87% Adjust to Bid Quantities= Y 1 j • 633 0; /2&/2002 TUE 10:37 FAX 805 546 8287 SOUZA CONSTRUCTION I006/0'ut ` Souza Construction, Inc. 05/24/2002 13:06 010426D UNSUITABLE#2 • Report Variation= QUICK-DETAIL On Takeoff Quantifies Labor Hrs. (MH/MHS) 32 0 32 (incl burden) 1,422 0 1,422 Labor(DAY/DAYS) 0 0 0 (incl burden) 0 0 0 Labor(OtherUnits) 0 0 0 (incl burden) Labor Burden 549 0 549 Spread Indirects on: TotalLessSub Spread Markup on: Markup% r►;'2.8/2f'i,_Spre-d'Adddns&Bond on: TotalLessSub Markup on: Labor Burden PermMatl GM CoEgp RentedEgp 15.0% 15.0% 15.0% 15.0% 15.0% 15.0% EOE Sub 15.0% 15.0% Bond Table: > 2,500,000.00 =_> 7.9 ; > 2,50o,ow.00 5.5 > 0.00 (Rate per 1000) > 0.00 =_? 0 ; > 0.00 = 0 } 0.00 0 _ ESTIMATE NOTES:----- Bid Date. Owner Engr Firm: Estimator In-Charge: Desired Bid (ii specified)= 0.00 Nates: 2 X34 UJr'4i;/LUU'L Y'UE 10:38 FAX 805 548 8287 SOUZA CONSTRUCTION C3 01 0 G MOW ca MNM1r .�rO W • a M 4 N O O U p c at v E R CL m 75 cL Lu a co CD ED E C C`7 O to N N 6t li7 ID mr r OCH So o`t a v% a Op N O m 05/28.` - a d (o � �rt�7�onA Q* N Lu V F _ O C gOp$ q Qp tp ct Lq {� • V �� SdC! OGOW'O�,�7m4, u7 Lu 3 CEJ U 0 0 00 CD to t� 10 C v�a�zCtt=�zz= �x z r O t>7 m O co p w m N M Q o 0 0 0 0 ci N tNa C O } rn a cu U L MW LL1 aM Lu o _ �SLu LL -Ro cz a0 of [3 c EmS—So 0ELa: n opo. u t a° �0O � � o Qom_ _5 Ln a Lo mN . 1= aflttT¢ �t-!� MgoLLIp RQ -a C5 A 2 m IIr:.OO � r A • U5/28/2002 TUE 10:38 FAX 805 548 8287 SOUZA CONSTRUCTION 0]008/GL .r 0 • N T O N 4QN a� 4 N O o �C d C G O Q R 7 a G-0 LL C.d' m t E 3� tv m X G W 0 t)� D5128l��1r" T:� 41 - 2 0 W c cc y� m EL Q :_ C3 m W 0: '�v O S- Cc; �0 So �s G m = m II cc m 3- P7 sm s 7 0 6- 0 y J Q :1 ❑O a la ,D T m o e ar c a �o� `I'--` # w � 7. y E Lu -i m ® o S Mof Ct SW cp m�= s� m v LWt of t•" > e A ijy O X10 IBM o i aF U1 o C w H E c Q Ram ! N0 W v, m N p C C ea � m 9 c o U • oQ I m _— � ' 13;1rn v�iv=1 � ' CITY OF ATASCADERO R. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS OR ` - ^, 6500 PALMA AVENUE,ATASCADERO,CA 93422 CADS% Telephone:(805)461-5020 • F=(805)461-7615 CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER No.: CCO-05 Project: EI Camino Real Bikelanes, Phases 2 and 3 Bid No.: 2000-05 Date of Issuance: October 9, 2002 Contractor: Souza Construction, Inc. You are hereby directed to make the following changes in the Contract Documents. Revise the contract documents per Attachment A Purpose of Change Order.• Extra Work Item added to contract. Attachments: Attachment A-Change Order Itemization CHANGE IN CONTRACT PRICE: CHANGE IN CONTRACT TIME: Original Contract Price Original Contract Time $142,286.00 40 working days Previous Change Orders Net Change from previous Change Orders CCO#1 $500.00 0 working days CCO#2 $0.00 0 working-days CCO#3 $5,262.60 0 working days CCO#4 $3,684.60 0 working days $9,447.20 Contract Price prior to this Change Order Contract Time prior to this Change Order $151,733.20 40 working days Net Increase of this Change Order Net Increase(Decrease)of this Change Order $1,734.68 0 working days Contract Price with Change Orders 1 through 4: $153,467.88 Recommended by: Approved by: Accepted by: Souza Construction, Inc. Steven B. Kahn Wade G. McKinney (signature) Public Works Director City Manager (printedname • C:\DOCUME-1\skahn\LOCALS-1\Temp\CCO#S.doc Page 1 of 2 037 ° CITY OF ATASCADERO R.18 met �,91g - - DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 6500 PALMA AVENUE,ATASCADERO,CA 93422 CAD Telephone:(805)461-5020 • Far.(805)461-7615 ATTACHMENT A CHANGE ORDER NO. CCO-05 EL CAMINO REAL BIKELANES, PHASES 2 AND 3 BID NO. 2000-05 It is mutually agreed by and between the City and the Contractor that the following changes are hereby made to the contract documents,special provisions and plans. Numbers in parenthesis designate a reduction on the contract price. I. EXTRA WORK ADDED TO CONTRACT(see attached documentation): 1. Raise Valves 8 Ea. @ $182.74 $1,461.92 2. Clean Valves 3 Ea. @ $90.92 272.76 • NET INCREASE THIS CHANGE ORDER: Accepted by Souza Construction, Inc. (signature) (date) (printed name) C.U=UM-1\skahn\LOCALS-1\Temp\CC0#5.doc Page 2 of 2 Z0*d L8Z8 9t7S SOB bti:t7T zow-Tc-Nnr o ze v nt r n rn 1 C " N w if u tu a t tu E v m o 0 c o ao Q V tUt y� J r C7 a d LU J ¢Z W J Q CL' ul LijJ x m w u � " vi � � W z o C7 N m 4 u o :R o, m N { , Leze 9PS SOB ST:17T EOOE—TE—NrLC • Souza Construction, Inc. 06/21/2002 15:11 010426G ATAS.B[K[-LANES-RAISEICLEAN VALVES ESTIMATE RECAP- BID QUANTITIES DIRECT INDIRECT TOTAL %OF TOTAL Labor 423.70 423.70 28.3% Burden 292.80 292.80 19.6% Lab+Bur 716.50 716.50 47.9% Perm Matl 0.0% Const Exp 320.00 $20.00 21.4% Equipment 460.00 460.00 30.7% Subs 0.0% Other 0.0% Total Costs: 1,496.60 1,496.50 100.0% 9'0 of Total 100.0011/0 0.00% 100.00% *Data Below here is dependertt on the Summary Process. The Summary Process was last run 06/21/2002 at 15:10 Markup on Derail Costs 224.48 15.0% Cost Addons GL,Difference from Default %of TL 0,00 0.0% Bond from Summary Table 13.70 0.9 MARKUP,ADDON&BOND TOTALS 238.18 15.9% CAST+MARKUP > _-- --- (%Of Costs) $1,734.68 (On Takeoff Quantity) There" ARE NOT *closing accounts for this bid. -Effect on Bid- Rounding difference: Unbalancing difference: From Cut&Add Sheet-costs: (on Bid Quantity) From Cut&Add Sheet-markup: (on Bid Quantity) Net Adjustments(to the balanced bid): [or desired bidj BALANCED BID TOTAL $1,734.68 DESIRED BID(if specified) BID TOTAL (on bid quantifies) $1,734.68 BID COSTS(on bid quantities) $11510.20 MARKUP (on bid quantities) $224.48 14,86/, • EXPECTED JOB VALUE(on takeoff quantities): $9,734,68 , EXPECTED COSTS (on takeoff quantities): $1,510.20 EXPECTED MARKUP (on takeoff quantities): $724.48 14.86% • Adjust to Bid Quantities= Y i7o cl Laze 9bS SOB ST:VT ZOOZ—TE—Nnf Souza Construction, Inc. 06/21/2002 15:11 010426G ATAS, BIKE LANES-RAISE/CLEAN VALVES Report Variation= QUICK-DETAIL On Takeoff Quantities Labor Hrs. (MH/MHS) 20 0 20 (incl burden) 717 0 717 Labor(DAY/DAYS) 0 0 0 (incl burden) 0 0 0 Labor(OtherUnits) 0 0 0 (incl burden) Labor Burden 293 0 203 Spread Indirects on: TotalLessSub Spread Markup on: Markup°!0 Spread Addons&Bond on: TotalLessSub Markup on: Lahr Burden PermMaU CM CoEgp Rentedi"gp 15.0% 15.0% 15.0% 15.0% 15.0% 15.0% EOE Sub • 15.0% 15.0% Bond Table: > 2,500,000.00 => 7.9 > 2,500,000.00 =_> 6.5 > 0.00 ==> 0 (Rate per 1000) > 0.00 => 0 > 0.00 =_> 0 > 0.00 =_> 6.5 ---ESTIMATE NOTES:-- Bid Date: Owner. Engr Firm: Esbmator-In-Charge: Desired Bid(if speafied)_ 0.00 Notes: 2 644 S0'd L8z8 9vs S0B ST:VT ZOOZ—Tz-Nnf 0 10 a6� cm ID N In O CNI ID Ci NWS meq N� ANN r--to V; MQ m N ~ r r N N h Q o� N r C U 0 0 4 m pj o y$ a m ON W m� m GC"J NN U W h W W C 4 cr W C c c x W r4 c"I$ W o C1 o t7 U co n v n 0 o m �o cmc Q m � 0o TT m N N 11 8 U ,z 0 N Cq d Q O sacz 0 0 v O O C m0 mo C6 N is d V QQ � 000060 N �o' OOOoOOO^ f� �U SQ Q0000s�lC±`1 a.O C3 C3 DA p [� nj soo000 Ocav ev � Nn�CNO�°NS i' C fOHrr ONrm CD N G it W U LU U 04 0O CO a7 e0 N � U�pp p22=.G pp 'F 2QQ 2po22���� � W 0 OpQ 000 GOC7 Ito 0 � 04000400 W5 +rO�OCOmomm Jp - 6NNC4ONNp JLLIrt o, o00 as �+ 000 00 CC W y LLJ (� C w coLLJ m Lu DO E�¢d�S7] �Z g�Lil y 0 E y Z Co O w > >�S !"� yyo�uj fn N Q W N y W atcl m� oq tq yea a � uf7 go H.... ��U v�C o�M Cf) Q 9 Z�} a 1L.�p Q a�to �� L-icMi cF LU WWUC. ��� Tm c��{qq�(JIL) 3 m r:a rU5 i2=-o� nm 1�cy n# oma • o. tea" 1.11 Go tuw LL .moo a r it CA m n OU Q W Z QUO G N CO �0 r3. ,..� mNm^ Orc H.n K[yF =mroi �f nes �� Q co co N Cmv_ p m a e�*0CPP,C��to n M� N o Q m r us it w.- m N It N rl a cR a v>n f�4 Inn/(-An Illi --l— I n-w 9o'd LSZ8 9vs SOB ST:VT z00z-TF-Nnf O N r M O !a O CL e cv g 0 C wo CL LU CL H U io � g m � Ci 0 G W a � U 'C N O La =V CL" � u r c U LU G Z C O N V LU U LU p C p i O 9 w m N O y oa n z C Q K W Z C J C • C2 m o o 0 C p m n U) L001900 In '7 ZprC u 1 68'd Laze 9ps SOB St:#T e0 !Z-Nn£ Cos § 77 . t� IM . . kk crL §d . .. .15 CL / o o � C.) § kk / W= n [ a q f � -me � = • � 3U. L) Wm � k\� . R� 2 as G BB px. § U-£ } e £ s §§ ( . . . . f /\ - , m . S . § = ® a 70 . z | k\ Lem U kkki k) . ••\ -0 ,f $ 2 . � g§&k ) _ { `f7 %\® - CL \^ aI/2 ) ; 2 J 2 ]= [ ■ : to < ] k m LoolLo0 2 CITY OF ATASCADERO R. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 1 ris l 19'9 r srs �' 6500 PALMA AVENUE,ATASCADERO,CA 93422 � E80/ Telephone:(805)461-5020 • Fay(805)461-7615 CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER No.: CCO-06 Project: EI Camino Real Bikelanes, Phases 2 and 3 Bid No.: 2000-05 Date of Issuance: October 9, 2002 Contractor., Souza Construction, Inc. You are hereby directed to make the following changes in the Contract Documents. Revise the contract documents per Attachment A Purpose of Change Order., Extra Work Item added to contract. Attachments: Attachment A- Change Order Itemization CHANGE IN CONTRACT PRICE: CHANGE IN CONTRACT TIME: Original Contract Price Original Contract Time $142,286.00 40 working days Previous Change Orders Net Change from previous Change Orders • CCO#1 $500.00 0 working days CCO#2 $0.00 0 working days CCO#3 $5,262.60 0 working days CCO#4 $3,684.60 0 working days CCO#5 $1,734.68 0 working days $11,181.88 Contract Price prior to this Change Order Contract Time prior to this Change Order $153,467.88 40 working days Net Increase of this Change Order Net Increase(Decrease)of this Change Order $6,486.99 0 working days Contract Price with Change Orders 1 through 5 $159,954.87 Recommended by: Approved by: Accepted by: Souza Construction, Inc. Steven B. Kahn Wade G. McKinney (signature) Public Works Director City Manager (printed name • c:wocuNE~I\skahnLLOMS-lXTempICCO s.doc Page 1 of 2 k vk�� CITY OF ATASCADERO 'R.e� • `R a'. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 6500 PALMA AVENUE,ATASCADERO,CA 93422 isis g 1979- Telephone:(805)461-5020 • Fam(805)461-7615 ATTACHMENT A CHANGE ORDER NO. CCO-06 EL CAMINO REAL BIKELANES, PHASES 2 AND 3 BID NO. 2000-05 It is mutually agreed by and between the City and the Contractor that the following changes are hereby made to the contract documents,special provisions and plans. Numbers in parenthesis designate a reduction on the contract price. I. EXTRA WORK ADDED TO CONTRACT(see attached documentation): Church Improvements,including retaining wall, rock-lined channel and miscellaneous paving. NET INCREASE THIS CHANGE ORDER: Accepted by Souza Construction, Inc. (signature) (date) (printed name) c:\DMUME-I%skahn\LOCALS-1�Temp\cc0#6.doa Page 2 of 2 4 EL CAMINO REAL BIKELANES, PHASES 2 AND 3 CCO#6 BACK-UP INFORMATION • Extra Work at Church: Amount Shown on Inv. 02p019e $7,275.25 Less Amount to Water and Roll Base in front of Church ** 788.26) Approved CCO#6: $6,486.99 ** This is amount is not billable because it was to clean up work previously done to back- up retaining wall with more dirt. • I:\99126\Documents\CC0#5 Back-up.doc G-4 7 *** C O N T R A C T I N V D I C E *** O: City of Atascadero _ Invoice No 02p019e 6500 Palma Avenue Invoice Date: 07/31/2002 ATAS CADERO CA 93422 TEE Estimate No: 02 019e Completed Thru: 07/31/2002 FROM: Souza Construction, Inc Owner Job No $#2000-05 : ;_a-n----w - ms ..e.. P.O. Box 3810 SAN LUIS OBISPO CA 93403-3810 805-546-8288 CONTRACT: 02p019 El Camino Real Bike Lanes/Atasc. ##2000-05 PHASE DESCRIPTION OF WORK ---------CONTRACT VALUES--------- -PREVIOUS COMPLETED- ---THIS INVOICE---- ---TOTAL TO-DATE--- QUANTITY UNIT PRICE $ AMOUNT QUANTITY $ AMOUNT QUANTITY $ AMOUNT QUANTITY $ AMOUNT 001 Traffic Control System 1.000 LS 8000.0000 8000.00 1.000 8000.00 0.000 0.00 1.000 8000.00 002 AC Type B/Misc. 1825.000 SY 16.0000 29200.00 2175.000 34800.00 0.000 0.00 2175.000 34800.00 003 Aggregate Base, Class 2 293.000 TN 101.0000 29593.00 345.860 34931.86 0.000 0.00 345.860 34931.86 004 RSP Facing Class 15.000 TN 123.0000 1845.00 15.000 1845.00 0.000 0.00 15.000 1845.00 005 RSP Fabric, Type A 20.000 SY 8.0000 160.00 20.000 160.00 0.000 0.00 20.000 160.00 006 Asphalt Concrete Dike 1800.000 LF 5.3600 9648.00 1393.000 7466.48 0.000 0.00 1393.000 7466.48 007 AC Overside Drain 3.000 EA 621.0000 1863.00 2.000 1242.00 0.000 0.00 2.000 1242.00 008 Relocate Sign Panel& Po 5.000 EA 109.0000 545.00 5.000 545.00 0.000 0.00 5.000 545.00 009 Relocate Fire Hydrant 1.000 EA 1663.0000 1663.00 1.000 1663.00 0.000 0.00 1.000 1663.00 010 Rel.Wtr Service Assembl 1..000 EA 557.0000 557.00 1.000 557.00 0.000 0.00 1.000 557.00 *Relocate Mailbox 1.000 EA 186.0000 186.00 1.000 186.00 0.000 0.00 1.000 186.00 Roadside Sign 13.000 EA 176.0000 2288.00 12.000 2112.00 0.000 0.00 12.000 2112.00 013 Traffic Stripe/Detail 6 1490.000 LF 0.3000 447.00 1490.000 447.00 0.000 0.00 1490.000 447.00 014 Traffic Stripe/Detail 8 957.000 LF 0.3000 287.10 957.000 287.10 0.000 0.00 957.000 267.10 015 Traffic Stripe/Detail 1 600.000 LF 0.6000 360.00 600.000 360.00 0.000 0.00 600.000 360.00 016 Traffic Stripe/Detail 2 1350.000 LF 0.5000 675.00 1350.000 675.00 0.000 0.00 1350.000 675.00 017 Traffic Stripe/Detail 2 200.000 LF 0.6500 130.00 200.000 130.00 0.000 0.00 200.000 130.00 018 Traffic Stripe/Detail 2 130.000 LF 1.3000 169.00 130.000 169.00 0.000 0.00 130.000 169.00 019 Traffic Stripe/Detail 3 650.000 LF 0.6000 390.00 650.000 390.00 0.000 0.00 650.000 390.00 020 Traffic Stripe/Detail 3 124.000 LF 2.0000 248.00 124.000 248.00 0.000 0.00 124.000 248.00 021 Traffic Stripe/Detail 3 359.000 LF 3.0000 1077.00 359.000 1077.00 0.000 0.00 359.000 1077.00 022 Traffic Stripe/Detail 3 7760.000 LF 0.4000 3104.00 7-160.000 3104.00 0.000 0.00 7760.000 3104.00 023 Traffic Stripe/Detail 3 615.000 LF 1.2000 738.00 615.000 738.00 0.000 0.00 615.000 738.00 024 Pavement Marking 436.000 SF 4.0000 1744.00 436.000 1744.00 0.000 0.00 436.000 1744.00 025 Rem.Traff.Stripes&.Marki 1.000 LS 9250.9000 9250.90 1.000 9250.90 0.000 0.00 1.000. 9250.90 026 Delineator/Class 1/Type 4.000 EA 64.0000 256.00 5.000 320.00 0.000 .0.00 5.000 320.00 C27 Object Marker/Type L 6.000 EA 97.0000 582.00 4.000 388.00 0.000 0.00 4.000 388.00 C28 Object Marker/Type P 1.000 EA 61.0000 61.00 1.000 61.00 0.000 0.00 1.000 61.00 C29 Tree Protection 40.000 LF 2.7000 108.00 100.000 270.00 0.000 0.00 100.000 270.00 031 Traffic Control System 1.000 LS 1070.0000 1070.00 1.000 1070.00. 0.000 0.00 1.000 1070.00 032 AC/Type B/Overlay 45.000 TN 183.4000 8253.00.. 227.000 41631.80 0.000 0.00 227.000 41631.60 033 AC/Type B/Misc. 228.000 SY 22.0000 5016.00 631.000 13882.00 0.000 0.00 631.000 13882.00 C34 Aggregate Base, Class 2 314.000 TN 45.0000 14130.00 246:120 11075.40 0.000 0.00 246.120 11075.40 035 Roadside Sign 6.000 EA 160.0000 960.00 6.000 960.00 0.000 0.00 6.000 960.00 C36 Rem.Traff.Stripe& Marki 1.000 LS 1932.0000 1932.00 0.000 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.000 0.00 Traffic Stripe/Detail 2 1158.000 LF 0.5000 579.00 1158.000 579.00 0.000 0.00 1158.000 v 579.00 raffic Stripe/Detail 3 233.000 LF 2.5000 582.50 233.000 582.50 0.000 0.00 233.000 562.50 C39 Traffic Stripe/Detail 3 7490.000 LF 0.5000 3745.00 7490.000 3745.00 0.000 0.00 7490.000 3745.00 040 Traffic Stripe/Detai1 3 285.000 LF 1.5000 427.50 285.000 427.50 0.000 0.00 285.000 427.50 48 *** C O N T R A C T I N V D I C E *** TO: City of Atascadero Invoice No 02p019e 6500 Palma Avenue Invoice Date: 07/31/20 ATASCADERO CA 93422 Estimate No: 02p019e Completed Thru: 07/31/2002 FROM: Souza Construction, Inc. Owner Job No #2000-05 P.O. Box 3810 SAN LUIS OBISPO CA 93403-3810 805-546-8288 CONTRACT: 02p019 El Camino Real Bike Lanes/Atasc.##2000-05, PHASE DESCRIPTION OF WORK ---------CONTRACT VALUES---------- -PREVIOUS COMPLETED- ---THIS INVOICE---- ---TOTAL TO-DATE--- QUANTITY UNIT PRICE $ AMOUNT QUANTITY $ AMOUNT QUANTITY $ APSC'JNT QL'AivTITY $ A,tiiOJi7T 041 Pavement Marking 104.000 SF 4.0000 416.00 104.000 416.00 0.000 0.00 104.000 416.00 043 Trim Willow Tree CCO#1 1.000 is 500.0000 500.00 1.000 500.00 0.000 0.00 1.000 500.00 Original Contract Total: 142,786.00 188,036.54 0.00 188,036.54 099 Unsuitable Mat'ls CCO#2 1.000 is 5262.6000 5262.60 1.000 5262.60 0.000 0.00 1.000 5262.60 099 Unsuitable CCO#2 SUPP#1 1.000 is 3684.6000 3684.60 1.000 3684.60 0.000 0.00 1.000 3684.60 099 Raise/Clean Valves CCO# 1.000 is 1734.6800 1734.68 1.000 1734.68 0.000 - 0.00 1.000 1734.68 099 Church Work CCO#4 1.000 is 7275.2500 7275.25 0.000 0.00 1.000 7275.25 1.000 7275.25 099 Temporary Drain CCO#5 1.000 is 597.1900 597.19 1.000. 597.19 0.000 0.00 1.000 597. Total Change Orders: 18,554.32 11,279.07 7,275.25 18,554.3 Total Contract To-Date: 161,340.32 199,315.61 7,275.25 206,590.86 Work Completed To-Date: 206, 590 . 86 Less Retention: 20, 659. 10 ------------- 185, 931. 76 Less Previous Billing: 179, 384. 04 (90/1 ?z?�,2�) Current Payment Due: 6, 547 . 72 Gi49 M N K -a o 0 N 0- E •�.. d Q Qd � U o 6 3 m � 3 Of ❑ ❑ 0 c m _ 0 R a o O a � W 3 a ~ O � O m N r° p m .a y o mR LLm d d co BLOIr m Z m Q W 3 EA W O ao ❑ ❑ co p o a 0O a a m ° N ca-E E E U 3 m z z :; c a O of a R m O c m m E �; m z z r my m d O O O >. a 0 o 0 o O R o a c4 � q o oy I O N N N m c = m aJ _ > > E a a z CL c FA CL 3w t `p J -� O N CD O R C 4 J m m N N 00 CO 00 N • t CN N to N O O O W R V O �t v N c V c E R `O � g d _ c. R a° 0 0 0 0 0 0 U') ocr m to y -� = N N z N N N N U w II o �, m > > U m = N 00 o C EA U m Co m Y O O M r C F- R Z O L71 O o Q Z Z CNI o �2 00 8 o ZO � o oo Q = Y Y `o to W 0 C? N W W U � oo o z Z ix o O D Q o � v o o Z Z t9 U 2 d c = �* o J o o _ H2< O F- O CL =j w Q a yy Y N m C 7 c c 6 O = E N Q ° t o a' m m m m m U Q ami C,4 a g a N r N z o z m U m m d DW a m a * E 4N m N 0 v W N tO 000 © o o _I O O O _1 0 y r O y O Y� Crn 0 O O > S > � m m N m Ol O C C v W c� y N LL V e • CITY OF ATASCADERO R. ® DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 6500 PALMA AVENUE,ATASCADERO,CA 93422 Telephone.(805)461-5020 • Fac(805)461-7615 CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER No.: CCO-07 Project. EI Camino Real Bikelanes, Phases 2 and 3 Bid No.: 2000-05 Date of Issuance: October 9, 2002 Contractor., Souza Construction, Inc. You are hereby directed to make the following changes in the Contract Documents. Revise the contract documents per Attachment A Purpose of Change Order., Final Accounting of Contract Item Quantities Attachments: Attachment A- Change Order Itemization CHANGE IN CONTRACT PRICE: CHANGE IN CONTRACT TIME: Original Contract Price $142,286.00 Original Contract Time 40 working days Previous Change Orders Net Change from previous Change Orders CCO#1 $500.00 0 working days • CCO#2 $0.00 0 working days CCO#3 $5,262.60 0 working days CCO#4 - $3,684.60 0 working days CCO#5 $1,734.68 0 working days CCO#6 $6,486.99 0 working days $17,668.87 Contract Price prior to this Change Order Contract Time prior to this Change Order $159,954.87 40 working days Net Increase of this Change Order Net Increase(Decrease)of this Change Order $32,045.13 0 working days Contract Price with Change Orders 1 through 6 $192,000.00 Recommended by: Approved by: Accepted by: Souza Construction, Inc. Steven B. Kahn Wade G. McKinney (signature) Public Works Director City Manager (printedname • C.MOCUME—ftkahn\LOCALS-1\Temp\CCO#7.dw Page 1 of 2 • CITY OF ATASCADERO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ,19� m 6500 PALMA AVENUE,ATASCADERO,CA 93422 Telephone:(805)461-5020 • F=(805)461-7615 ATTACHMENT A CHANGE ORDER NO. CCO-07 EL CAMINO REAL BIKELANES, PHASES 2 AND 3 BID NO. 2000-05 It is mutually agreed by and between the City and the Contractor that the following changes are hereby made to the contract documents,special provisions and plans. Numbers in parenthesis designate a reduction on the contract price. I. FINAL ACCOUNTING OF CONTRACT ITEM QUANTITIES (See attached Final Pay Estimate) NET INCREASE THIS CHANGE ORDER: Accepted by Souza Construction, Inc. (signature) (date) (printed name) • f 52 C.V=UME-1\skahn\LOCALS-1\Temp\CCO#7.doc Page 2 of 2 FINAL PAY ESTIMATE PROJECT: EI Camino Real Bikelanes, Phases 2 and 3 NAME OF OWNER` City of Atascadero NAME OF CONTRACTOR: Souza Construction, Inc. DATE OF COMPLETION: AMOUNT OF CONTRACT: DATE OF ESTIMATE: Original: 7/9/02 Original: $142,286.00 From: 8/1/02 Revised: Revised: $192,000.00 To: 9/1/02 CONTRACT ITEMS THIS PERIOD TOTAL TO DATE ITEM 11 DESCRIPTION 11 QNTY IUNITJ UNIT PRICE QNTY AMOUNT Ir QNTY AMOUNT Phase 2 1 Traffic Control System 1 LS $8,000.00 0% $0.00. 100% $8,000.00 2 Asphalt Concrete,Type B 1,825 SY $16.00 0.00 $0.00 2,175.00 $34,800.00 3 Aggregate Base,Class 2 293 TON $101.00 (25.11) ($2,536.11) 320.75 $32,395.75 4 Rock Slope Protection, Facing Class 15 TON $123.00 0.00 $0.00 15.00 $1,845.00 51 Rock Slope Protection Fabric,Type A 20 SY $8.00 0.00 $0.00 20.00 $160.00 6 Asphalt Concrete Dike, City Std 418 1,800 LF $5.36 0.00 $0.00 1,393.00 $7,466.48 7 Asphalt Conc Overside Drain, Caltrans D87B 3 EA $621.00 0.00 $0.00 2.00 $1,242.00 8 Relocate Sign Panel and Post 5 EA $109.00 0.00 $0.00 5.00 $545.00 9 Relocate Fire Hydrant 1 EA $1,663.00 0.00 $0.00 1.00 $1,663.00 10 Relocate Water Service Assembly 1 EA $557.00 0.00 $0.00 1.00 $557.00 111 Relocate Mail Box 1 EA $186.00 0.00 $0.00 1.00 $186.00 121 Roadside Sin 13 EA $176.00 0.00 $0.00 12.00 $2,112.00 13 Traffic Strip, Detail 6,Two-Coat Paint 1,490 LF $0.30 0.00 $0.00 1,490.00 $447.00 14 Traffic Strip, Detail 8,Two-Coat Paint 957 LF $0.30 0.00 $0.00 957.00 $287.10 15 Traffic Strip, Detail 19,Two-Coat Paint 600 LF $0.60 0.00 $0.00 600.00 $360.00 16 Traffic Strip, Detail 21,Two-Coat Paint 1,350 LF $0.50 0.00 $0.00 1,350.00 $675.00 17 Traffic Strip, Detail 22,Two-Coat Paint 200 LF $0.65 0.00 $0.00 200.00 $130.00 18 Traffic Strip, Detail 276,Two-Coat Paint 130 LF $1.30 0.00 $0.00 130.00 $169.0 19 Traffic Strip, Detail 31,Two-Coat Paint 650 LF $0.60 0.00 $0.00 650.00 $390.0 20 Traffic Strip, Detail 38A,Two-Coat Paint 124 LF $2.00 0.00 $0.00 124.00 $248.00 21 Traffic Strip, Detail 3813,Two-Coat Paint 359 LF $3.00 0.00 $0.00 359.00 $1,077.00 22 Traffic Strip, Detail 39,Two-Coat Paint 7,760 LF $0.40 0.00 $0.00 7,760.00 $3,104.00 23 Traffic Strip, Detail 39A,Two-Coat Paint 615 LF $1.20 0.00 $0.00 615.00 $738.00 241 Pavement Marking,Two-Coat Paint 436 SF $4.00 0.00 $0.00 436.00 $1,744.00 251 Remove Exist Traff Stripe&Pvmt Markings 1 LS $9,250.90 0% $0.00 100% $9,250.90 26 Delineator,Class 1,Type F 4 EA $64.00 0.00 $0.00 5.00 $320.00 27 Object Marker,Type L 6 EA $97.00 0.00 $0.00 4.00 $388.00 28 Object Marker,Type P 1 EA $61.00 0.00 $0.00 1.00 $61.00 29 Tree Protection 40 LF $2.70JL--0-00 $0.00 100.00 $270.00 Phase 3 1 Traffic Control System 1 LS $1,070.00E(170.75) $0.00 100% $1,070.00 2 sphalt Concrete,Type B(Overlay) 45 TON $183.40 ($31,315.55) 56.25 $10,316.25 3 sphalt Concrete,T e B Miscellaneous) 228 SY $22.00 $0.00 631.00 $13,882.00 4 regate Base,Class 2 314 TON $45.00 $0.00 246.12 $11,075.40 5 Roadside Sin 6 EA $160.00 0.00 $0.00 6.00 $960.00 61 Remove Exist Traff Stripe&Pvmt Markings 1 LS $1,932.00 0% $0.00 0% $0.00 7 Traffic Strip, Detail 21,Two-Coat Paint 1,158 LF $0.50 0.00 $0.00 1,158.00 $579.00 8 Traffic Strip, Detail 3813,Two-Coat Paint 233 LF $2.50 0.00 $0.00 233.00 $582.50 9 Traffic Strip, Detail 39,Two-Coat Paint 7,490 1 LF $0.50 0.00 $0.00 7,490.00 $3,745.00 10 Traffic Strip, Detail 39A,Two-Coat Paint 285 LF $1.50 0.00 $0.00 285.00 $427.50 111 Pavement Marking,Two-Coat Paint 104 SF $4.00 0.00 $0.00 104.00 $416.00 C.Overage 170EJ1 .75 TON $120.92 170.75 $20,646.25 170.75 $20,646.2 lf�[ 1 11 Contract Totals: This Period: ($13,205.41) Accrued: $174,331.13 (CC)CAwindowslTEMP1ECR bikeway phase 2 3.wb2 Page 1 of 2 Pages Print Date 10/11/02 FINAL PAY ESTIMATE PROJECT: EI Camino Real Bikelanes,Phases 2 and 3 C ntract Change Orders Trim Willow Tree 1 LS $500.00 0.00 $0.00 1.00 $500.00 7"'.4 d'. of Amt. Released for Pa ment-PPE2 1 LS $0.00 0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 Remove Unsuitable Material(Mini-Mart) 1 LS $5,262.60 1.00 $5,262.60 1.00 $5,262.60 Remove Unsuitable Material(Church) 1 LS $3,684.60 1.00 $3,684.60 1.00 $3,684.60 Raise and Clean Valves 1 LS $1,734.68 1.00 $1,734.68 1.00 $1,734.68 CC05 Misc. Impr. (Church) 1 LS $6,496.99 1.00 $6,486.99 1.00 $6,486.99 CC06 Final Acct (Final Pay Quant-shown above) 1 LS $0.00 1.00 $0.00 1.00 $0.00 Change Order Totals: This Period: $17,168.87 Accrued: $17,668.87 TOTAL This Period: $3,963.46 Accrued: $192,000.00 AMOUNT THIS PERIOD ]TOTAL TO DATE Amount Earned $3,963.46 $192,000.00 Less Amount Retained ($396.35 ($19,200.00) Plus Additional City Retention from PPE No.2 $15,564.01 Previous Payments xxxxxxxxxx ($153,668.88) 11 mount Due $19,131.12 $19,131.12 Estimated Percent of Job Completed: 100% Is Contractor's Construction Progress on Schedule? Yes hereby state that I have carefully observed the work and as a result of my observations and to the best of my knowledge and belief,the quantities shown on this estimate are correct and have not been shown in previous estimates and the work has been performed in substantial accordance with the contract documents By: Steven J.Sylvester, Project Engineer Date Approved by Owner: CITY OF ATASCADERO By: Steven B. Kahn, City Engineer Date Acceptance by Contractor: SOUZA CONSTRUCTION, INC. By: (print name) (signature) Date t 1354 (CC)CAwindows%TEMMECR bikeway phase 2 3.wb2 Page 2 of 2 Pages Print Date 10/11/02 RECORDING REQUESTED BY: (and when recorded, mail to:) City Clerk CITY OF ATASCADERO • 6500 Palma Avenue Atascadero, CA 93422 NOTICE OF COMPLETION NO TRANSFER OF PROPERTY Notice is hereby given pursuant to Civil Code Section 3093: 1. The undersigned is corporate officer for the City of Atascadero,owner of properly hereinafter described. 2. The full name of the owner is the City of Atascadero. 3. The full address of the owner is: 6500 Palma Avenue,Atascadero,CA 93422 4. The nature of the interest of the owner is in fee. 5. A work of improvement on the property hereinafter described was completed on July 23,2002. 6. The work done was the El Camino Real Bikelanes,Phases 2 and 3. 7. The name of the contractor who performed such work of improvement was Souza Construction, Inc. Dated: By: • Wade G.McKinney,City Manager City of Atascadero VERIFICATION I,the undersigned,say that I am the City Manager,declarant of the foregoing Notice of Completion;I have read said Notice of Completion and know the contents thereof;the same is true of my own knowledge. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on at the City of Atascadero,California. By: Wade G.McKinney,City Manager City of Atascadero C:\DOCUME"1\skahn\LOCALS"1\Temp\Notice of Completion.doc UOJ ITEM NUMBER: B-1 DATE: 10/22/2002 n � w,,e• �,a �: � 11918 ' ` �, 1979 �o Atascadero City Council Staff Report - Community Services Department Paloma Creek Park Playground Structure Replacement California Integrated Waste Management Board Grant Funds Resolution RECOMMENDATION: Council approve the draft Resolution authorizing the City Manager to apply for Grant Funds from the Park Playground Accessibility and Recycling Grant Program under the State of California's Waste.Tire Track and Other Recreational Surfacing Grants Program for Fiscal Year 2002-2003. • DISCUSSION: The playground structure at Paloma Creek Park is failing and is out of compliance with Guidelines for Public Playground Safety, as stipulated by the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC). In addition, this playground structure does not comply with accessibility standards as stipulated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Recently, the plastic tube section of the large slide connected to this slide failed. Staff has removed this section of the playground structure. Replacement cost of this section of the playground structure is in excess of $5,000.00 and would necessitate upgrading of the entire structure to current codes. As a result, the slide cannot be replaced until the funds are available to replace the entire structure and provide compliant accessibility surfacing. Staff is seeking grant funding for this project. The State of California administers grant funds for the Waste Tire Track and Other Recreational Surfacing Grants Program, specifically for this purpose. $1,000,000 has been allocated by the State of California for this grant program for fiscal year 2002-2003. The application for this matching grant program requires that the governing body of applicant • agencies certify by resolution the authorization of the Grantee to apply for Park Playground, Accessibility and Recycling grant funds. ITEM NUMBER: B-1 DATE: 10/22/2002 FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this resolution will allow the City of Atascadero to apply for up to $100,000.00 of Park Playground Accessibility and Recycling Grant Program. If grant funding is authorized, the City of Atascadero would be responsible to match the amount funded through the grant program. ALTERNATIVES: None. ATTACHMENT: Draft Resolution • T • DRAFT RESOLUTION RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF AN APPLICATION TO THE CALIFORNIA INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR THE 2002/2003 PARK PLAYGROUND ACCESSIBILITY AND RECYCLING GRANT PROGRAM. WHEREAS, the people of the State of California have enacted Assembly Bill 1843 (Brown, Statutes of 1989, Chapter 974) that provides grants to public entities involved in activities that result in reduced landfill disposal of used whole tires and reduced illegal disposal or stockpiling of used whole tires; and WHEREAS, the California Integrated Waste Management Board has been delegated the responsibility for the administration of the program for the State, setting up necessary procedures governing program applications; and WHEREAS, said procedures established by the California Integrated Waste Management Board require the applicant to certify by resolution approval of the application before submission of said application to the State, and 0 WHEREAS, if awarded a grant, the applicant will enter into an agreement with the State of California for development of the project; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE that the City Council of the City of Atascadero authorizes the submittal of an application to the California Integrated Waste Management Board for the 2002/2003 Waste Tire Track and Other Recreational Surfacing Grant Program. The City Manager of the City of Atascadero is hereby authorized and empowered to execute in the name of the City of Atascadero, all necessary documents, including but not limited to, applications, agreements, amendments, and payment requests necessary to secure grant funds and to implement and carry out the purposes specified in the grant application. On motion by Council Member and seconded by Council Member the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ADOPTED: October 22, 2002 City of Atascadero Resolution No. Page 2 i CITY OF ATASCADERO J. Michael Arrambide, Mayor ATTEST: Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: • Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney ITEM NUMBER: B-2 DATE: 10/22/2002 ' r f918 k 1979 cm Atascadero City Council Staff Report- Community Development Department Zone Change 2002-0028 /Conditional Use Permit 2002-0065 Tentative Tract Map 2002-0016 (Tract 2489), 1625 / 1683 / 1685 El Camino Real (Kelly Gearhart/Wilson Land Surveys) RECOMMENDATION: Planning Commission Recommends Council: 1 Adopt draft Resolution A certifying the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration 2002-0035; and, • 2. Introduce for first reading by title only, the draft Ordinance A, for the creation of a new PD- 17 overlay district; and, 3. Introduce for first reading by title only the draft Ordinance B approving Zone Change 2002- 0028 rezoning the project site to RSF-X / PD-17 subject to a Master Plan of Development; and, 4. Adopt draft Resolution B approving Conditional Use Permit 2002-0065 for the Master Plan of Development subject to findings and conditions of approval; and, 5. Adopt draft Resolution C approving Tentative Tract Map 2002-0019, subject to findings and conditions of approval. REPORT IN BRIEF: The proposed project consists of a Planned Development Zone Change with a Master Plan of Development and Tentative Tract Map to allow a 38 unit single-family residential subdivision with a maximum density of 4 units/acre. The subdivision will consist of a total of 40 lots, two of which will be used for an open space feature/ stormwater detention basin. The site is flat with two rural residential houses surrounded by pastures with eight native oak trees. The site is located along El Camino Real (arterial street), which will provide project access. Public water and sewer are, available to the site, and will serve the project. The project is consistent with the General Plan . 060 ITEM NUMBER: B-2 DATE: 10/22/2002 Land Use designation and requires a Planned Development Overlay to allow density up to 4 du's/ac and lot sizes smaller than 1/2 acre. • General Plan Designation: SFR-X(Single Family Residential 1/2 acre [4 dwellings/ac max]) Zoning District: RSF-X(Residential Single Family 1/2 acre) SITUATION AND FACTS: 1. Applicant: Kelly Gearhart, 6205 Alcantara Avenue, Atascadero, CA 93422 Phone: 805/674-3711 2. Property Owner: Kelly Gearhart 3. Representative: Ken Wilson, Wilson Land Survey, 7400 Morro Road, Atascadero, CA 93422 4. Project Address: 1625 / 1683 / 1685 El Camino Real, Atascadero, CA 93422 APN 049-102-008, 009 5. General Plan Designation: SFR-X (Single Family Residential 1/2 acre [4 dwellings/ac max]) 6. Zoning District: RSF-X(Residential Single Family 1/2 acre) 7. Site Area: 9.90 acres(net) 8. Existing Use: The site is flat with two rural residential houses surrounded by pastures with eight native oak trees 9. Environmental Status: Proposed Negative Declaration 2002-0035 posted September 10, 2002 DISCUSSION OF PLANNING ISSUES: Planning Commission Hearin The Planning Commission held a public hearing on October 1, 2002 on the proposed project. Public comment on the project was limited to a statement by the project applicant and Babak Naficy, attorney for the Environmental Center of San Luis Obispo (ECOSLO). The Commission's deliberations focused on requiring affordable units, the design of the park and garage setback requirements. The Commission ended up conditioning the project to include two moderate-income units or pay an equivalent in-lieu fee. The Commission decided to recommend that the park remain a passive recreation facility with turf, trees and some benches. PD-17 was also recommended to require a 10-foot setback difference from the front of the house to the, • ITEM NUMBER: B-2 DATE: 10/22/2002 • garage. The Planning Commission voted 5-0 to recommend approval of the project to the City Council. 1. General Plan Consistency The proposed project area was re-designated to SFR-X (Single Family Residential 1/2 acre [4 dwellings/ac max]) during the recently completed General Plan update. Under Housing Policy HOS 1.1.4. Single-family residential planned developments are permitted in the SFR-X land use. Since this will be the first project subject to this new policy the adoption of a new Planned Development #17 is required and is being process concurrently with this application. - - The project is consistent with a !=i C a L AF>f13�10 R fiL number of Housing Element goals r _ ? _ including the creation of for sale single-family units on lots smaller k s a than 1/2 acre. Policy HOS 2.2.2 ! - }►`'f w I �; ,� ' ,t . requires the adoption of an inclusionary affordable housing I.. 1 : 1° { or� nce by 2004. Since no s � t �I- { � , �( affordable housing requirement is l currently in effect the project does # I f f ! is not include any deed restricted affordable units. The Planning 4 f Commission could recommend that • { I, f ' . � . the City Council require some of the units to be affordable. 0 BConsistent with Policy LOC 6.1.1. x� '� , {` {$ na the project includes a '/z-acre open £ space park feature along El Camino Real. The mini park will be improved r { ' ` ' ,' ` ; {{ W with landscaping and passive { �- J recreation features and will also serve { > > as a storm water basin but only need to be one foot deep. This mini park ` - will be maintenance responsibility of Y _ �> ,,; ! f u, the project. r z}Re q,o {$""IN 1,t�,�,�;�};4}a�1s���sp J __ 6 ! x 7 7 It is staffs opinion that the proposed r '1 lls. project is consistent with the 2025 �' .... General Plan. 2. Planned Development 17 Consistent with General Plan Policy HOS 1.1.4. a new planned development overlay district is • required for projects in the SFR-X land use. During the General Plan Update process the 06" 2 ITEM NUMBER: B-2 DATE: 10/22/2002 Commission and Council discussed adapting the existing PD-7 overlay for the SRF-X land use • and to restrict its use to larger lot outside of established neighborhoods. Based on this direction, staff has prepared the following proposed standards for Planned Development 17. Adoption of the new overlay is required for the project to proceed. The Commission could make recommendations to the Council to modify the proposed PD-17. 9-3.662 Establishment of Planned Development Overlay Zone No. 17: (PD17). A Planned Development Overldy Zone No. 17 may be established in the RSF-X single-family residential zones on lots with a net acreage exceeding one acre. The maximum density within the planned development shall not exceed a gross density of 4.0 units per acre. The following development standards shall be applied to all projects within Planned Development Zone No. 17: (a)A Master Plan of Development of the site shall be approved.All construction and development shall be done in conformance with the approved Master Plan of Development. (b) No subsequent tentative parcel or tract map shall be approved unless found to be consistent with the approved Master Plan of Development. (c)A proposed planned development project shall consist of no fewer than four(4) residential units. (d)A parent lot or lots shall have frontage on a public street. (e) Each dwelling unit shall be subject to review under the City's Appearance Review Guidelines. (f) Building setbacks shall be as follows: . ,.Front yard at #15 feet y orch fl S'Front yard at FO feet : tlwellinv g _ Front yard at u NN'25 feet~N µ :garage ... : 3Side ards +Side yard 12 feet ` :t (corner lot) _ N iR r hard rcmf r� feet- � 'Accessorym�� feet Hf ;structure side ;,and rear yards s ..,.. ..m..I........................... ......... Garages shall be recessed from the front of the residence by at least ten (10) feet. (1) Physically Unique Sites. Sites with one (1) or more mature trees, steep slopes, riparian areas and/or some other unique physical characteristic are not subject to the above setback requirements provided the following findings are made: (i) that flexibility from the above setback standards is necessary to enable the environmentally superior design alternative; (ii) that at least fifty percent (50%) of each individual lot will be landscaped; and (iii)that at least sixty percent (60%) of the net area of the overall site will be landscaped. • UOJ ITEM NUMBER: B-2 DATE: 10/22/2002 • (g) Building coverage (residence plus garage footprint) shall not exceed thirty-five percent (35%) of the individual lot area. Landscaping shall constitute a minimum of forty percent (40%) of the lot area. The measurement of landscaped areas shall be exclusive of driveways, patios, decks, etc. (h) Two-story residences shall have a second floor that is limited to seventy-five percent (75%) of the gross area of the first floor inclusive of the garage. (i) All mechanical equipment, including HVAC units and utility meters, shall be screened from view from adjacent streets and properties. 0) Exterior fencing shall be consistent throughout the project. Design and appearance of fences and/or walls shall be compatible with the design of the dwelling units. k) Accessory buildings (sheds, etc.) will be allowed; however, the footprint of such accessory buildings will count toward the maximum percent of allowable building coverage. (1) Each proposed lot shall have a minimum frontage of sixty (60) feet measured at the 25-foot setback line. The minimum net lot area shall be 6,400 square feet. (m) Parking for two-resident vehicles shall be provided in a garage with minimum interior dimensions of twenty (20) feet by twenty (20) feet. One guest parking space of at least nine (9) feet by eighteen (18) feet shall be provided on each individual lot. The driveway area may be used to satisfy the guest parking requirement. On-street parking shall not be used to satisfy the parking requirements. (n)All frontyards and street facing sideyards shall be landscaped. • (o) Individual trash collection shall be used for each residential unit. Provisions shall be made for storage of trash cans within the garage or fenced area. (p) All utilities, including electric, telephone and cable, along the frontage of and within the PD shall be installed underground. (q) Alterations or additions to established dwelling units shall be subject to the density standards of the underlying zone and shall be reviewed pursuant to the City's Appearance Review Guidelines. (r) No farm animals may be kept on a lot. If the above Planned Development standards are adopted, the project would be consistent with those standards. The proposed project consists of 38 new detached, single-family units on individual lots with minimum net lot sizes ranging from 6,400 to 10,000 square feet net. The project includes four separate elevations and floor plans. All of the units have three bedrooms with living areas ranging from 1300 to 1600 square feet. All of the units have detached two car garages located at the rear of the site. Each lot is consistent with the PD-17 requirement of providing a minimum of 40% of the parcel for landscaping and building footprints of less than 35% of the parcel area. The Master Plan of Development will cover all site development, landscaping and architectural design standards for the project. The Master Plan of Development will be approved in the form of a Conditional Use Permit as required by the Zoning Ordinance. As conditioned, changes to the Master Plan of Development can be made by the Planning • Commission in the future without Council action. , 664 ITEM NUMBER: B-2 DATE: 10/22/2002 3. A_ppearance Review The Master Plan of - • Development will control site design and appearance >« issues including landscaping d dsca p g an architecture. The project has been designed with >: four different single story floor plans that incorporate traditional architectural - materials, colors, and s features. Architectural r'� ' ` '�' ti 'r i treatments include raised al porches, double hung - -...............__.. ......---------- ------. windows, creative use of siding materials and attention to historic ... .`<<• , '': architectural details. All .:. trash storage and air , "w`:"":::f•:>:>::r :<: .............. v::<v conditioning condenser �::x ��� >>>•.<;: =::f:�>�-: •.t• • is - ::'r.{{::5:•} 'vir:' -.h: units will be screened from .:, :>,,:<.:....:.......:•{.:{:::.,.,:.;•::::::::::::.::.:.;.:;.;:.::>:;:::<.:::;.;::.. view w be d fenced enclosures. The site landscape plan includes a traditional streetscape with detached sidewalks andfYon street tree planters. The ° --------- - PD requires that front --- - - yards to be landscaped with " the houses. Existing native trees on the site have been incorporated into the site design and will enhance the new site landscaping. All common landscape maintenance will be the responsibility of a maintenance organization. The project has been conditioned to provide one five-gallon live oak on each lot as required by the Tree Ordinance. t • 6�J ITEM NUMBER: B-2 DATE: 10/22/2002 • .:[;::'F,.i.=-'•+•may+-•�::.w..A:: .»f'W/Fry::..::'�:::ii:. - .f n'"•+\'•_:.i•:n FIc'+'moi, �'"v.•�..:'i::Li::i:. :>3•:� �•9k.i'�'o*.':,:LTi.:•: -"ii ri:>''• +�.'..-.:i:. �':-...:`Y,.v:.y4y;. .Y.Ns{r_..��'i::'r:'� ::i:. r,{f.�.;:y"n�rn'1'f,.•,'ri'.,Ctv::::i'.. :•ff.. v f+: ............ .:{:Xti:\�.n iiif ii5rin:. �•+f ...:?;Y•y�'i::.. . 'f{ ASR ��pp b'Z�•^•. :... .i:: J { �(�p�Q � pppp��pppp y� f { s ;;s o :::,N{�.•+`fl..fH. .:.J::�,i S� is� ,;•{7:.i�1.i'Y,{ra:y:'::::i:':i:::•.:.�..:;i:..... a}.:.: ' .._.. ..... .:ncoc;.:s:•::z•::.1 �i+;>:.::..:::. yr %>.;::.i;k ';'r!•:ys� 6.:2-+'�.•:r?t':�~+`Si ..............:: g E_1 Tib, .3 ....................... __.._........................................._ • .............................................. . �� ,:::.v frly+{GrrrYf,_ :::•A.+f:�;<..:. .. •;c::;:: ' x''��.•{�,`•';, "d�'`:; ;:rvd{�`:s•{>.� `'',"k`,:f =^..q: h5 '��•:!,;• ..�Y". .. +�<?�C'¢{•' f -� .>:>;:,iAY: .S:;Y&. ��: 'Y{f a:{u-at..y�' Mu Fill ' •�'0'(•:�:{'.: ..... {.:::::.:...:.C;.h,..Y•�'..� A � f.. .{{b� :f ry :W.YM>+ :: ..-:.is is .Aslyy%'rzitiigy7y f r `""f:.:: 4''"' ..�"""'�•+�+�> ��BE��.'£.'. iv, ��•}. ...................... ....... --........._...__ .......................................................... ..... ............... { »"rrsIT • f .. n Vdb ITEM NUMBER: B-2 DATE: 10/22/2002 4. Oak Tree Preservation • The site contains eight large native oaks tree that will be preserved including the large white oak on the El Camino Real frontage. The project has been conditioned to preserve and protect the native trees. Porous paving blocks will replace conventional paving where the streets and driveway runs beneath tree drip lines. The porous pavers will help prevent soil compaction, allow gases to escape from the soil, which are toxic to tree roots when trapped in the soil by a solid covering, and allow oxygen to enter the soil, which is essential for tree root growth. The project is conditioned to require an arborist to be retained to monitor construction and the health of the trees. 5. Project Benefits One of the required findings for the approval for a planned development rezone is that the project must "offer certain redeeming features to compensate for the requested modification." The project's mini park located along the El Camino Real frontage would meet the criteria for a project benefit. In addition, the project will include innovative streetscape and architectural design that far surpass those of a non-planned development project. 6. Tract Map The 40-lot tract map is part of the project and consistent with the Master Plan of Development. The tract map has been conditioned by staff and the City Engineer to meet all City standards including street frontage improvements and off-site improvements. 7. Fronto e Im rovements and Utilities • The City Engineer will require public improvements along the El Camino Real. El Camino will begin to taper down to 2 lanes at the project. This is consistent with the General Plan traffic analysis and will allow for the preservation of the numerous large white oaks along this stretch of El Camino Real. City Sewer, AMWC water and utilities will serve this project. 8. Off-site Drainages Project storm water is collected in an on-site storm water basin. It detains the 50-year storm event and releases a 2-year storm event to an existing culvert in El Camino Real. This culvert outlets on the east side of El Camino Real in front of a driveway of an existing residence. The storm water has historically drained down this driveway to the US 101 right-of-way and under US 101 in a culvert. From US 101 storm water is conveyed in a seasonal creek to a culvert under San Ramon Road and on to Graves Creek. The applicant is required to mitigate any effect of the project storm water flow on down stream property. An analysis of the storm flow to Graves Creek is required in the conditions of approval. The applicant has agreed to construct a storm drain from El Camino Real to the US 101 right-of- way to mitigate the storm water impacts on this property. 9. Common On-Site Facility Maintenance The project has common on-site facilities that serve all the residences. The project interior streets include curb, gutters, and sidewalks and pocket parking. Storm water is collects in the street and • - 067 ITEM NUMBER: B-2 DATE: 10/22/2002 • conveyed in a storm drain to a basin located at the base of the project. The City Engineer is recommending that the applicant provide for the maintenance of on-site shared improvements. This includes roads, sidewalks, street trees, streetlights, drainage facilities, recreation areas and common landscaping. The two methods that may be used are either a Homeowners Association or Assessment districts. • Homeowners Association. An Association is formed and funded by monthly dues. This Association would be responsible for the maintenance, repair and replacement of the facilities, as we as enforcement of the CC&R's. The homeowners elect a board that runs the Homeowners Association. This gives the residence direct control over their neighborhood. Homeowners Associations are commonly used on development such as this. • Assessment District and Landscape and Lighting District. Funds for the maintenance, repair and replacement of the facilities could be collected on the property tax bill and distributed to the City. The City would use the funds to complete the required work. There are no existing Landscape and Lighting Districts in the City. Public Works Staff is working on setting up Assessment Districts for exiting roads in the City, but has not started any yet. A system will need to be setup to provide this service. 10. Environmental Revieiv: The initial study concluded that there would be no significant harm to the environment as a result • of this subdivision, when mitigation measures are implemented. A proposed Mitigated.Negative Declaration has been prepared for the project and certification of the Negative Declaration is included in the draft resolution of approval. The proposed mitigation measures have been incorporated into the project's conditions of approval. FISCAL IMPACT: The project would likely have a slight negative impact on City revenues. As a general rule, single- family dwellings require services that exceed the revenue generated by the dwelling. CONCLUSIONS: The project • Is consistent with the 2025 General Plan. • Includes innovative traditional styled street designs and architecture. • Fulfills Policy HOS 1.1.4. by creating the PD-17 overlay district. • Will save all of the native oak trees. • Will provide a '/s-acre park. • Will provide 38 new single-family dwellings on neighborhood-sized lots. ITEM NUMBER: B-2 DATE: 10/22/2002 ALTERNATIVES: • 1. The City Council may approve the project subject to additional or revised project conditions. The Council's motion to approve needs to include any new or revised project conditions. 2. The Council deny the project. The parcel would retain its designation of SFR-X. 3. The Council may continue the hearing and refer the item back to staff or the Planning Commission for additional information or analysis. Direction should be given to staff and the applicant on required information. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 -- Location Map (General Plan&Zoning) Attachment 2 -- Planning Commission Minutes Attachment 3 -- Draft Resolution A Attachment 4 -- Draft Ordinance A Attachment 5 -- Draft Ordinance B Attachment 6 -- Draft Resolution B Attachment 7 - Draft Resolution C • - i1 b ITEM NUMBER: B-2 DATE: 10/22/2002 • ATTACHMENT 1: Location Map(General Plan/Zoning) General Plan Designation: SFR-X (Single Family Residential 1/2 acre [4 dwellings/ac max]) Zoning District: RSF-X (Residential Single Family 1/2 acre) :.::...... :..........:::..:::::::::::.:::..::::::::..:::::::::.::::::.:.:.......::....:.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::. :;:.;:.: :. ........... vv5h::::•: .'•v)��i:<'�:iiii::::.::::^:::!!:i:?:i::iiiiiiii:i::::::i::!:�:�`:i:>':ii�:?:j:iii}i::< :: »}::iii:�i:�?:}ii:.•iiiiiii:�i:�:?:�>:::::::?.:j•:.}:S::i:iT:-i vt4, :.: :: ...:.:.. :.::.:::•:. .. :?iiiii:�::�:�i:�iiiiii'�iiiiiiiiiiiii:. '<i�iiiii:is ^iiiii::�.::�i iiiiii;�::::::::::::::..::•ii?:}:>:4'::.::::::::.ii i>:�">:"iiiiiii:::;:iiiiii:�;:�:.:�.�: .v. '`` iii'.::;:i::iiiiiiiii:Y%:i : :.�.: .;:::::::::: :::::::: .v:• ......:..iii'.iiiiiiiiiiiii::: ::i::i::::::i:: ::Lv:::i::i::i::i::iii: i:: :iiii i;i::iiiiiii!:<: 'i::i::i..�(".::::i`:::i:::: v:.b.::...._::..:::::::::iiiiiiii:-. •. ., +. :;::-'�i::•_iiii:::::::::::::::.�.;::.:�._::::::......::::. -....... ,:.:.i:;:':iiiiiiiii:i• � 4 iiii::. S �• ffi:;::::::::::. ".�'�Ji=:-:iiiiii:�i:�...� • ••••• :•: :iiiiiiiii:::'iiiiiiii} :.'e_.v..,... . �j .....:. ........... :.:::::::::.:.iii : :.:.i•:�::.i..i:. : .� ! :::-...... ..iiii.�.�::.:.::::::::::.is�'}. :ii�•.;.'_.:.:iiiiii:.---ii i'iiii:�:�:-:.�..:.�.�.:- { ✓.' ?.vv ..f'::!iy iiii.:.;,'�: ..,�`r.............:: :::: �::::: :...:. :.:.i i:::iiiiii is {4• ........ /}. .Y :::..'•��:::�:�:�::�:� :�:�:'���".iiii�... :::f•'.;:�;: .. .., .iiii.�::.::::::::::::::............. .......... ... :..: R•. ,_ ..::.. :iii:�i:i..: c..., .::.:.,..�.,..:.::.::...;...:::.•:ii:.:i>.:•i3...::;:.S:;�.i.k�::;.::.��.:;•:+i:.�:.:;.::::;..•.::•.:i:.:::...::..:::..:>..............`.:••..:Y...:..:.'..:'....:..::x.:...:;.:...:.i:;.:.....:.:::�..::.;..:.::?....::.::. :..;.i5i.:;s:.::...k:.;,.:::i:'.E::<:i.::::`i:•.i.:::i..:.:�.....':>G.i.. :ii;i:i:i.i:ii.:`.:.;•:E;i<.:?:�`si.i:.i;o:.:%:.::;�.>.•i�. ii.i.i.:•r.i.i.i:-..:i.�.,.z":i. 2 :\»:..::.<:::>::^::^:,.::�i;>.i:.:!.>;.i;�.s..i•.i�?�.`.�:.i.'i��E.:E.,.;:?.%<:;.':i..i::.:i. ;;,:?i'::;:..:,:' .:::::e::::::i �i::::' :-:;i::iii : : .: .i i:i;;.:;:.;,_:::i; „r.• .......•::.i>:iii: .:::�.i:.;'.;,;i;i:.:;.i:. :::::::;::::::is i:., .:.:_:... ... .. Y:::i.}}:•>>;::«««::««.:.:;;.;:.iiii i>::::::::. ... �...::::.;..:........�<::;iii:::;.i:.:;<.:.�::. ..:::::4�.ii>iiii:::;::.:::::: :::.:::::::::.:. ..::...:::.... :....:.�. ::::.� - ,.•.•. ......... ..... ............... .. ::. :::.,iiii:::�.::ii:i;,i viiiiiii:iiii;:•+.' :i.4'�i:;:iiiiiiiii:-. :.�........ .... ,{.'........ :.... .::::::::!v:::::::::::::•',�.�?:!t�:.:i ii iiiiiiii_-::::::::::: ....:....... .. :........... .. ... ::.. ................ ......iiii: ..... . .::...,_ . .... ...................... .: . .::..... . ...... _ .. ....... .. ... :..... ...iiii:. .................... ..... .................. ....................: .. .... ._. .... : ,•iiii,- ..:::::::::::::. :: :i}iiiiiiiiiiiiiii"::i:4}iiiiiiii.�:[:if:[:ii."''i: :iY:i}iiiiiii.i::i::ii:ii::iiiiiiii..�:I:i[:::•.:L:4:..iiiii:i::iii:���`fF::::['.>[4 .. .[-F. ............. .:. �.......... ...:..iiii.:�::::::::: v:::::.�:h ..................... ..v:rr ............ v::::: v::::::::::::::.......'•' :.::.4 iiiiiiii':ii::::::.._:::::::::::: �:. :.:::.�:::..::iiiiii::�:::�.'iiii'�i .. .iiii::.-:::::::::::: i::.:,..: ;; .iiii:•: ii.. i:: :' ., '........;...� _ ";.:ii;ii,;.::.:....•. -:. � ...... .. .....:.. S ......... pp:.>.'«ti.. ......:::•::�.:.::.,:::;,.y�:::; e.:::.:�:?. .iiii,,t`'�::.i iiii: �iiiiiiiii;'J?�.�iii:•ii;i'�.:iiiiii:;.i':.. �..� <s ( ::.�'ik�iii:::•:::::::. v iii:}`:. i ii iiii:: '.'. :.:.. � F )�:iiiiiY',.i::•..:,. �::•.�::�:::::: ::v::.'. � iiii iiii:...T, ...:4 iiii::J,.:::iii i i5,::.:.:. :�:�:;.:: :.:.-.-. ........ ,......✓:.:::.:: ::•:::.�•iiii a! ....S :. :............., .:::::::::::::.... - =i:> ..... .:....;f: ...._.. :.:.:... S•:::•::• '�.,..iiii.- _,.;;.<•:. ,:.:... . ;;...:.}. 5t:::,.i:i•iiiii:'. :i+iiii:�::• c :.... ..... .... s .✓..`.:.:::.:•:�` ....... ,.. �'i'i i'ii:"'i'i i'P:`::':�::,:::............,,.: :i:'�i�::Nisi:iiii;:'<:�;ii;iii:=. :..,. .. ..:.:. .. .... ......:: ..... ....... ..iiii. ... .:::............... :.J� ::..w'i:i:�:i:>:•i:.'�: :1:'>":>f�? ..... 4'iiii........:.. • S::" ':•: ::::Y'�ii:i��:j::''i'�.:iiX;:;:'�i:;:;ii:=j{({:;:;:;:��!:i_�'::C": ;i:::%;';i:':. :::•::::.:::. .:.i.is <:<S;iii:.. ;. : : :::.::. :::..:.::::.:::::5 a�:,....::.:'. .:.:.:::.,...i. iiii. s..: .:::::... ,,........... ..... ,,..... .. ...� .............. . :::� :::•: ..:..,..... ::•. :........ :::. ... ;iiii .............:.�::::...::::.�:::.;.:i•::i::::::::::::.::.:.:::: .... ....... ..... ..%}:•}:•:... ,�:.�:::..�:. :.:::.•.:i:.::: ............. .............. iiii::..., 4. .S. �:.:.:.:.:.�.:..::..-.......- .:......... .iiii. ..... ::. :�!....4,...:;;ii:• .:::�'�iiii>i>r:."i::::i:4i:::.s�,,..�� ....... ....... .... ....... .........:k iiii;,;.:: ..... ... ........ ......... :>. ._.....,.........:,.:::v::::. �: ...... . ...._.-...- ......: ,......... ..... .... .i: ... .... :?:ii:•ii' .:iii. •<:,:::::.�::::.:: �:::::::::,::::::::::: ::::::::::::.::,,� `>�:::>.:::::-iiii:::. S ::. ...... .iiii .. .......... .... ....., ,..........iiii:•:•::•.,.. . ....:.... ......::.:. :::::::::. ter,, ;�;.: .�: .<;.,:.:.: ::,:..;i s 5.:;:.:•::::}.... iiiiii:•.4:• �1.;: k;;;;; .. :,,:-;:::. :..... .........:.. .::.: fir• ..:i+•�.'.:i.:-iiii::�::. ::.:.i.i.;.i�r s - •::. ....... ::............ ': ;:::::::::::::: �:?2?�i:• ':�i:4:�i:�i".iii:�:�:�i: .,............. :�:;�Fn>:�:ii:�: ..........__.-....�: :�:::.:.:..::.�.-.�. iiii::•::.v: �::::::::::::: .::� -.:.:.;.i•:! :...... ... , .. :......... +'iiiiii{ii?+ iiii :.._....� � - :.:.v::,•iiii:. ":::i`:" .::i2%%%2%:•. '.:i:;:;:;:;::;i" :::iiii::ii.;:i::i::i::i::i::ii>::ii::i s�i:..'':i::i::i::i:;::i::i�:':i:::::i:;�i:..`. '�'i:«::i::i::::i::i::.:.:.:::i::i::i:.::->:::.�1 :,.�:,. :::;:::.::;::_;.;::i> ><::::: ;:;iiii: S} ......:.....� ::•;;i;;ii:.iii:. :;i:::•i:•;;}»� ::::::::::::::.:::::::::............ .....................::: .... :.. . . :.,... ::.:..._ {:,>%:}:{i}:. iiiii;.iiiiii.;':;;.>iii:<ii:' •i:•i:•iiii}:«<;:'.i;iii;;;;:i::i::i:, ii. - ....., - iiii•:{.}::.}:.}}. ,:ii:.ii;:.iii;••.:i:i:.i:;•i:.;ii• :iiiiiii:•ii:.i:i• : ::::::::::.:. :::::...:........... ...:: : ,.:::.:::::::::::::::::.:�:::::: :... � 4 .:..:.fr:::::• iiii::.� .::::::.:::::: .�� SS.:�.}:.}}: :}%:. :>�:'::::::i�io-:i:i:::::i::o:• .:i::i:i:::;:::;::::•::::::':.i::i ::...::..:::: .::. ,..,. .::.�:.�:::is i.o.i,i.::'i.is ri:so->>:::.i:;:>::y::'.•ie:::. .........: xx '9E�:;,+.;:. ::�':• '<Sii S>i:: ::.:}>:<�:.::. .:>n:�>iiiii:oii::.i:�.:. ::::::..,�, ::�i:iiii:;�;i;:::..,•«:::�;i:;:::iiir�:is;':�:::: ;.::f/f : .. .. .: .iiii:::. ss ,,.:!:;}. E:.iff:;i:' ` ....::..... �'�,'.�,'o-,.. .. ..:.:.:.v�:�:�' .. :•'..•:::?. :���::; S :�:: .:.......:. :,.• .. :.:. .....:.::.:. ':;:iiii:'iiiii::�:.. ........ . ...... :.,. :::;iii,.. .::::::::.::::..:;-:::. : ::!//:{4:•.^•.4:•} i::•}i •. .. .::::::::: �.:.:.:..-. ...iii:::::::::::::::::.... .?r n:.}}:{•}:•:r. .............. ............ ii;i � :.::.: �:::.;:.>:.is.i:i.i:-i:.;:.:..::.. :.:.�:i:.>:.:..-<.:-is:.i:�:�:�i:�i:�>i:.iii:.i:.;� ?/......:>• �: ::::::::::i'`.�:::::::::::: iii:.:�:.>:;:i::ii: :::i::::?:::;:i=>:' ::i:.:.`"�-i'�::::::: ::::::i::»i::;>: :.:. .: ::::::.::::�:::::::5"::.::::::::::.:�:iiii:.. , :{:::}::•}:•}:•%•} .... ..... A S :iiiiii>::%z:i:<::. :•' is ki^` ............... :.i:is is i:.:;�i: .. ..:..... ... ::::.iii;•: ; �.........�:::::.. ....:::?{•? iiii:::.'..:'ii>i»ii:ii.... :..2:;:;:::: .;. .: :.,i:-;:,.. ..::�:- :;;;:.;--;::.� ::::;.i-->:-.:::::..:::::::::::::::: : ..-. .}}}}}>.... ";iiLCi• ::.. :.::::. :.....iiii.>: ::::::::.::::::ii.Dii;:.;.....:: ;i:%';?�.:�:::::? i>Y: . .; ::._: :.iiii �.�:::.:::: :::.�.:�.�.�::::: :..... <::i::>::.:;;�i::::::i:::::i::::r i::i:;'•�,:i::ii;::;�:::;;::;;:;iiii; ...........::.:. ;;::;,i :.; i::i::: •iii:.:::::::::::::::::. ::.�'i:.Ss'`:::::i>::>::::»:: � '>:::>::::::>::>::>::::>::> ":::...:`:`:: ;' M. ....:: �++�►'•�,;. 'iii>; ..5:;::::':•.:>: ����::. •}:''•�iiiS 5:.::::i::i::i::i:i..•,y'"":::>:—':iiii::>::::iii:>:::iiii.�. �. � .:::ii:>::>:..'YiiiiSiiS. :::». SSSS iii;;iii:.. ::i•i:•ii:.: :.:>;;.:::i:::::::::5s."::"�;>:._ _ ,..,,�.,•..,�..., :::. .>..:•... ciii:::;2:Y:'u�<'•:'i'•:5'':ii::?: :i>',:: bii >iii:Z:Si`i:i:=:`? ....i3� i��:.�k �'.;;..;.„,;:;: i:.;i"SC�iiiiiiiiiii:%�''.:iiiiii:.''iii:>`• �, }:ii6!+ii:•ii .iiiiiii. ..-. :.�:.: ��: iiii :iiii;;i>iii:; :,'.x`..�:.:.:�::: �;: ;iiiiii;�':'.'.,. �:: iiii: :ii:is�-�;: ��:'. ;;.,.�:i•:•i:i::;S S�:::::: •. �:iiii:i:i! ii.iiiisiiii . ...::5.�.�i:;:�:,tiiiii>;.;�:,,c.;,.� ���"•. :%;i•eRiiiiiio-ii;•i::•S%i%'::iii' ...., iiiiiiii:ci:-;i:�-:�;:-:i>iir:i: ',3. .....,!!!.;:.;):: iiii M.:::::.: Y < �•�•��'� :iiiiiiiiii:::•:S it”-. �': :S�iiii'�i:: .. :. :::�::::::::•: :.:.::::::.:. ?"':::::�:i;'.'.::;iiii>.: .}}.• ,e:::::::::::::::::..�5 ::::>:>:> ...�.:5<:>:i:i:i:;:=i:;S:>s;::i:�i:�: : . .:::. .i..-:�iiiiiii:ai:'^' �iiiii:�:i-.:ii.::':: ��� i;#•:: .• �::::::::::::::::: .......... .....:.:,.�..:i.`: �i;�iu;. ;:::<:;<•ii;;::: ::iii;�. ..iiii �.:::.:::. 4,•.:,.,,,.•;;. iiii:•::•:• .::««<,.., ,::.. :-::•., ,..::. ':. ;�:::::::.�:� .._.......,........�l /,.? ........:. ii<;. iiii:::::: :::�>:<:;;iii.::�>;i>:<7>:i:i:;.�::: ..:: . :•:iiii>::>::::>:«««<:::;;. ':::...... e,:�;. ..iiii:}:•? ..::::::::::: �i:h:i•i:ti f'.:......... :':.:.iiiiii:: �:�:.:3'�iiii .' ':i::i::i::..::::i::i::i::i:::. � �. _ �:::}.:•:::::ti:::::::::::. Y. ITEM NUMBER: B-2 DATE: 10/22/2002 ATTACHMENT 2: Planning Commission Minutes • 22 sg :.F: �9�a; , DRAFT CITY OFATASCADERO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting October 1, 2002 — 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Bentz called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. and Commissioner Jones led the Pledge of Allegiance. • ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Jones, Kelley, O'Malley, Fonzi and Chairman Bentz Absent: Commissioner Eddings Staff- Community Development Director Warren Frace, City Engineer Steve Kahn Associate Planner Glenn Rider, Planning Services Manager Steve McHarris and Recording Secretary Grace Pucci. ZCH 2002-0028 / CUP 2002-0065 /VESTING TTM 2002-0019 Applicant: Kelly Gearhart, 6205 Alcantara, Atascadero, CA 93422 Project Title: ZCH 2002-0028 / CUP 2002-0065 /Vesting TTM 2002-0019 Project 1625-1685 EI Camino Real, Atascadero, San Luis Obispo County • Location: APN 049-102-008, 009 ITEM NUMBER: B-2 DATE: 10/22/2002 Project The proposed project consists of Planned Development Zone Change with a • Description: Master Plan of Development and Tentative Tract Map to allow a 38 unit single family residential subdivision with a maximum density of 4 units/acre. The subdivision will consist of a total of 40 lots, two of which will be used for an open space feature/ stormwater detention basin. The site is flat with two rural residential houses surrounded by pastures with eight native oak trees. The site is located along EI Camino Real (arterial street) which h will provide project access. Public water and sewer are available to the site, and will serve the project. The project is consistent with the General Plan Land Use designation and requires a Planned Development Overlay to allow density up to 4 du's/ac and lot sizes smaller than 1/2 acre. General Plan Designation: SFR-X (Single Family Residential 1/2 acre [4 dwellings/ac max]) Zoning District: RSF-X Residential Single Family 1/2 acre Community Development Director Warren Frace provided the staff report and answered questions of the Commission. PUBLIC COMMENT Kelly Gearhart, applicant, answered questions of the Commission. Commissioner O'Malley asked Mr. Gearhart if he would be agreeable to working with staff to restrict several houses to moderate housing or to payment of in-lieu fees. Mr. Gearhart indicated that he would be amenable to perhaps restricting two houses or have the option to look at an in • lieu fee. Babak Naficy, attorney for the Environmental Center of San Luis Obispo (ECOSLO), addressed the Commission expressing his concerns with this project. Mr. Naficy urged the Commission to deny this project as proposed stating it was a violation of the City's zoning ordinance with respect to Development Overlays. (Attachment A) Chairman Bentz closed the Public Comment period There was Commission discussion regarding inclusionary housing/in-lieu fees and garage setbacks. Mr. Frace indicated that the PD-17 would be an ordinance and it would be advisable to recommend the garage setbacks at this time. There was Commission consensus for a 10-foot setback on garages. There was further discussion regarding the park and whether it would be a passive or active park. Concern was expressed over the proximity of the park to El Camino Real. Commissioner O'Malley suggested the installation of decorative fencing on the El Camino Real side. City Engineer Steve Kahn indicated that fencing could be used along El Camino Real and he liked the concept of an active play area. The Commission next considered the question of assessment district vs. homeowners association. City Engineer Kahn stated that in his opinion this particular development would work well with a homeowners association due to the densities involved in this project. A homeowners association could respond to problems in the development in a more timely fashion than the city could if it • were an assessment district. Chairman Bentz proposed votes be taken on the issues discussed. _ _ 672 ITEM NUMBER: B-2 DATE: 10/22/2002 MOTION: By Commissioner O'Malley and seconded by Vice Chairman Fonzi • to adopt a 10 foot setback for all PD-17 developments. AYES: Commissioners O'Malley, Fonzi, Kelley, Jones and Chairman Bentz NOES: None ABSTAIN: None Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote MOTION: By Commissioner O'Malley and seconded by Commissioner Jones to adopt a passive park. AYES: Commissioners O'Malley, Jones, Kelley and Chairman Bentz NOES: Vice Chairman Fonzi ABSTAIN: None Motion passed 4:1 by a roll-call vote MOTION: By Vice Chairman Fonzi and seconded by Commissioner Jones that at the applicant's option, the project shall include two (2) deed restricted moderate-income affordable units or pay equivalent in-lieu fees to be determined by staff. Deed restrictions or fees shall be provided at time of final map. • Commissioner Kelley stated he was opposed to placing this condition on the project as the rules for this issue have yet to be made. He feels the applicant has followed all the rules to this point and it is unfair to place this type of condition, which could present major financial obstacles, on the project. Commissioner Jones asked what the fees, if incurred would be used for. Director Frace indicated that because this would be an ordinance a process must be gone through to determine what fees would be collected, what the amount would be, how they would be held and what they would be used for. Commissioner Jones expressed his concern that this was not a requirement of the developer coming in. MOTION: By Vice Chairman Fonzi and seconded by Commissioner Jones that at the applicant's option, the project shall include two (2) deed restricted moderate-income affordable units or pay equivalent in-lieu fees to be determined by staff. Deed restrictions or fees shall be provided at time of final map. AYES: Commissioner Fonzi, O'Malley and Chairman Bentz NOES: Commissioners Jones and Kelley ABSTAIN: None Motion passed 3:2 by a roll-call vote. 073 ITEM NUMBER: B-2 DATE: 10/22/2002 • MOTION: By Commissioner Jones and seconded by Commissioner O'Malley to adopt Resolution No. PC 2002-0056, recommending that the City Council certify the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration 2002-0035; and, adopt Resolution No. PC 2002-0057, recommending that the City Council introduce an ordinance for first reading for the creation of a new PD-17 overlay district; and, adopt Resolution No. PC 2002-0058, recommending that the City Council introduce an ordinance for first reading to approve Zone Change 2002-0028; and, adopt Resolution No. PC 2002-0059 recommending that the City Council approve Conditional Use Permit 2002-0065 for the Master Plan of Development subject to findings and conditions of approval; and, adopt Resolution No. PC 2002-0060, recommending that the City Council approve Tentative Tract Map 2002-0019, subject to findings and conditions of approval with the deletion of Condition No. I LA.2., and with the addition of the following Public Works Map Conditions: 1. A common drainage and open space recreation easement shall be recorded against the park lots on the final map. 2. Prior to recording the final map, provisions for the repair and maintenance of the paving of the private road shall be included in the CC&R's for this tract. Included shall be a mechanism to maintain the private street, private sewer, and drainage swale and structures, such as a homeowners association. The City Engineer and City Attorney shall approve the final form prior to recordation. 3. Applicant shall pay sewer extension (annexation) fees prior to recordation of final map or upon issuance of building permit which ever occurs first. Sewer Connection and Reimbursement fees shall be payable upon actual connection of the building sewer to the public sewer system. 4. Gravity mains and other sewer facilities within the subdivision shall be privately owned and maintained. 5. Gravity mains within the subdivision shall be eight (8) inches in diameter. AYES: Commissioners Jones, O'Malley, Kelley, Fonzi and Chairman Bentz NOES: None ABSTAIN: None Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote'. 074 ATTACHMENT 3: Draft Resolution A • DRAFT RESOLUTION A A RESOLUTION OF THE ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL CERTIFYING NEGATIVE DECLARATION 2002-0035 PREPARED FOR ZONE CHANGE 2002-0028, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2002-0065, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2002-0019 (1625 / 1683 / 1685 El Camino Real, APN 049-102-008, 009/Gearhart) WHEREAS, an application has been received from Kelly Gearhart, 6205 Alcantara Avenue, Atascadero, CA 93422, (Applicant & Owner), to consider a project consisting of a zone change from RSF-X (Residential Single Family 1/2 acre) to RSF-X / PD-17 .(Residential Single Family with Planned Development Overlay #17) with the adoption of a Master Plan of Development, and an 40-lot residential tract map, on a 9.90 acre lot located at 1625 / 1683 / 1685 El Camino Real (APN 049-102-008, 009); and, WHEREAS, an Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration 2002-0035 were prepared for the project and made available for public review in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero held a public hearing following the close of the review period for the Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration to consider its adequacy and recommended certification; and, WHEREAS, the Atascadero City Council held a public hearing following the close of the review period for the Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration to consider its adequacy and the Planning Commission's recommendation; and, NOW, THEREFORE, the Atascadero City Council, at a public hearing held on Tuesday, October 22, 2002, hereby resolves to certify Negative Declaration 2002-0035 based on the following Findings as shown on Exhibit A: 1. The Negative Declaration has been completed in compliance with CEQA; and, T • Draft Resolution A October 22,2002 Page 2 of 4 • 2. The proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was presented to the City Council, and the information contained therein was considered by the City Council, prior to taking action on the project for which it was prepared; and, 3. The project does not have the potential to create a significant environmental impact; and, 4. The project does not have the potential to degrade the environment; and, 5. The project will not achieve short-term to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals; and, 6. The project does not have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable; and, 7. The project will not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings either directly or indirectly. • Draft Resolution A October 22,2002 Page 3 of 4 On motion b Council Member • y , and seconded by Council Member the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ADOPTED: By: Mike Arrambide, Mayor Attest: Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk Approved as to form: Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney Gt7 (ENDORSED) AILED CITY OF ATASCADEgQ 0 2002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPA4MMMMALD,COUNTY CLERK by S.K.RAMOS DEPUlYCLERK CITY OF ATASCADERO NOTICE OF PROPOSED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Atascadero Planning Commission will be holding a public hearing to consider the following project and environmental determination. The public is encouraged to attend. Applicant: Kelly Gearhart, 6205 Alacantara,Atascadero, CA 93422 Project Title: ZCH 2002-0028/CUP 2002-0065/Vesting TTM 2002-0019 Project 1625-1685 El Camino Real,Atascadero, San Luis Obispo County Location: APN 049-102-008,009 Project The proposed project consists of Planned Development Zone Change with a Master Plan of Development Description: and Tentative Tract Map to allow a 38 unit single-family residential subdivision with a maximum density of 4 units/acre. The subdivision will consist of a total of 40 lots,two of which will be used for an open • space feature/storm water detention basin. The site is flat with rural residential houses surrounded by pastures with nine native oak trees. The site is located along EI Camino Real(arterial street)which will provide project access. Public water and sewer are available to the site,and will serve the project. The project is consistent with the General Plan Land Use designation and requires a Planned Development Overlay to allow density up to 4 du's/ac and lot sizes smaller than 1/2 acre. General Plan Designation:SFR-X(Single Family Residential 1/2 acre[4 dwellings/ac max]) Zoning District:RSF-X Residential Single Family 1/2 acre Hearing Date: October 1,2002 Hearing Atascadero City Hall,7:00 p.m. Location: 6500 Palma Avenue,4"'Floor,Atascadero, CA 93422 Environmental Begins:September 10,2002 Review Dates: Ends: September 30,2002 Proposed Based on the initial study prepared for the project, a Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental is proposed. The proposed Negative Declaration is available for public review at Determination: 6500 Palma Avenue, Community Development Department, Room 104, from 8:00 a.m.to 5:00 p.m.,Monday through Friday. Any interested person may review the proposed Negative Declaration and project files. Questions should be directed to en Frac 461- 7. Warren M.Frace,Community Development Director Date Fke:KH 2002.0026.MMND.9A0.02. fd= Print Date 09/10/021I:44 AM 6500 PALMA AVENUE • ATASCADERO,CALIFORNIA 93422 (805)461-5035 0 FAX 461-5036 • "Isis 1979 CITY OF ATASCADERO PROPOSED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION #2002-0035 6500 Palma Avenue Atascadero,CA 93422 805/461-5035 Applicant: Kelly Gearhart, 6205 Alacantara,Atascadero,CA 93422 Project Title: ZCH 2002-0028/CUP 2002-0065/Vesting TTM 2002-0019 Project 1625-1685 El Camino Real,Atascadero, San Luis Obispo County Location: APN 049-102-008,009 Project The proposed project consists of Planned Development Zone Change with a Master Plan of Development Description: and Tentative Tract Map to allow a 38 unit single-family residential subdivision with a maximum density of 4 unitstacre. The subdivision will consist of a total of 40 lots,two of which will be used for an open space feature/storm water detention basin. The site is flat with rural residential houses surrounded by pastures with nine native oak trees. The site is located along EI Camino Real(arterial street)which will provide project access. Public water and sewer are available to the site,and will serve the project. The project is consistent with the General Plan Land Use designation and requires a Planned Development Overlay to allow density up to 4 du's/ac and lot sizes smaller than 1/2 acre. General Plan Designation:SFR-X(Single Family Residential 1/2 acre[4 dwellings/ac max]) Zoning District:RSF-X Residential Single Family 1/2 acre • Findings: 1. The project does not have the potential to degrade the environment. 2. The project will not achieve short-term to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals. 3. The project does not have impacts which are individually limited,but cumulatively considerable. 4. The project will not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings either directly or indirectly. Determination: Based on the above findings,and the information contained in the initial study 2002-0030(made a part hereof by reference and on file in the Community Development Department),it has been determined that the above project will not have an adverse impact on the environment when the following proposed mitigation measures are incorporated into the project(see attachment). Prepared By: Warren Frace Date Posted: September 10,2002 Public Review Ends: September 30,2002 Attachments: 1. Mitigation Measures 2. Location Map 3. Site Plan/Tentative Tract Map 079 F3.ZCH 2OD2-M&IS-MND.9.10.02. [doc Prim Dam 09/1M 11:"AM 6500 PALMA AVENUE ATASCADERO,CALIFORNIA 93422 9 (805)461-5035 FAX 461-5036 i 19t8 � gam' CITY OFATASCADER0 INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM Applicant: Kelly Gearhart,6205 Alacantara,Atascadero,CA 93422 Project Title: ZCH 2002-0028/CUP 2002-0065/Vesting TTM 2002-0019 Project 1625-1685 El Camino Real,Atascadero, San Luis Obispo County Location: APN 049-102-008, 009 Project The proposed project consists of Planned Development Zone Change with a Master Plan of Development Description: and Tentative Tract Map to allow a 38 unit single-family residential subdivision with a maximum density of 4 units/acre. The subdivision will consist of a total of 40 lots,two of which will be used for an open space feature/storm water detention basin. The site is flat with rural residential houses surrounded by pastures with nine native oak trees. The site is located along El Camino Real(arterial street)which will provide project access. Public water and sewer are available to the site,and will serve the project. The project is consistent with the General Plan Land Use designation and requires a Planned Development Overlay to allow density up to 4 du's/ac and lot sizes smaller than 1/2 acre. General Plan Designation:SFR-X(Single Family Residential 1/2 acre[4 dwellings/ac max]) Zoning District:RSF-X(Residential Single Family 1/2 acre • Lead Agency Name City of Atascadero and Address: 6500 Palma Avenue Atascadero,CA 93422 Contact Person and Warren Frace Phone Number. City of Atascadero 6500 Palma Avenue,Room 104 Atascadero,CA 93422 General Plan Single Family Residential 1/2 acre minimum(SFR-X) [4 dwelling units/acre Designation: maximum] Zoning: Residential Single Family 1/2 acre minimum(SFR-X) [4 dwelling units/acre maximum Surrounding Land North: Large lot single family residential Uses and Setting: South: Large lot Rural Residential West: Large lot Rural Residential East: Large lot Rural Residential Other public None. agencies whose approval is required (e.g.,permits,financing approval,or participation • agreement) 09/10102 - 080 ZCH 2002-0028.IS-MN0.9-10-02.wrtddoc CITY OF ATASCADERO y IMTIAL STUDY Attachment 1 i Mitigation Measures 3.b.1. The project shall be conditioned to comply with all applicable District regulations pertaining to the control of fugitive dust(PM-10)as contained in section 6.4 of the Air Quality Handbook. All site grading and demolition plans notes shall list the following regulations: A. All material excavated or graded shall be sufficiently watered to prevent excessive amounts of dust. Watering shall occur at least twice daily with complete coverage,preferably in the late morning and after work is finished for the day. Increased watering frequency would be required whenever wind speeds exceed 15 mph. Reclaimed water should be used whenever possible. B. All Gearing,grading,earth moving,or excavation activities shall cease during periods of high winds(i.e.greater than 20 mph averaged over one hour)so as to prevent excessive amounts of dust. C. All material transported off-site shall be either sufficiently watered or securely covered to prevent excessive amounts of dust. D. The area disturbed by clearing,grading,earth moving,or excavation operations shall be minimized so as to prevent excessive amounts of dust. E. Permanent dust control measured identified in the approved project revegetation and landscape plans shall be implemented as soon as possible following completion of any soil disturbing activities. F. Exposed ground areas that are planned to be reworked at dates greater than one month after initial grading shall be sown with fast-germinating native grass seed and watered until vegetation becomes established. G. All disturbed areas not subject to revegetation shall be stabilized using approved chemical soil binders,jute netting,or other methods approved in advance by the APCD. H. All roadways,driveways,sidewalks,etc.to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible. In addition, . structural foundations shall be completed as soon as possible following building pad construction. 1. On-site vehicle speed shall be limited to 15 mph for any unpaved surface. J. All unpaved areas with vehicle traffic shall be watered at least twice per day,using non-potable water. K. Streets adjacent to the project site shall be swept daily to remove silt which may have accumulated from construction activities so as to prevent excessive amounts of dust from leaving the site. L. Wheel washers may be required when significant offsite import or export of fill is involved. M. All dirt stock-pile areas should be sprayed daily as needed. 3.c.1. Pedestrian walkways will be provided within the project with connections to future commercial use areas along EI Camino Real. 3.c.2. Large canopy shade trees shall be provided along street frontages to minimize urban heat build-up. 4.e.1. All construction within the drip lines of native trees shall be consistent with the mitigation requirements of the 6/23/02 arborist report. 4.e.2. A tree fencing protection plan shall be submitted with construction plans and installed prior to permit issuance. 4.e.3. All tree removals shall be mitigated consistent with the requirements of the Atascadero Native Tree Ordinance. 4.e.4. An arborist shall be retained monitor construction,mitigations,and overall tree health. 8.c.1. A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan(SWPPP)will be required to be approved by the RWQCB prior to construction. 11.a.1. Installed landscaped berms along the west sides of lots 1 and 31. 11.a.2. Construct all housing will stucco siding and concrete or the roofing materials to reduce interior noise. • U81 04/10/02 ZCH 2002.0028.IS-MND.9-10-02.wrnr.doc CITY OF ATASCADERO i INITIAL STUDY • Attachment 2 Location Map 1625-1685 El Camino Real Atascadero, CA Project Site • �{ � � �` ��}rte.��' � �, MW eg C � c"{{ x p- � -. '•A*,<� ��� wa t xE �`. .nom' x • @ tt i i{ ' ` , Rl- w'f 082 09/10/02 2CH 2002.0028.I&MND.9-10-02.wmf.doc wti CITY OFATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY Attachment 3 • Site Plan !Tract Map Ali i . y 1 ° L�� a �= E !;f 5' t teetteeeee esfstttfaf e t ? �iiiii�611 �r� yI IN int. D } !E ® tf3■ARA e! o s �I IF] � �1 A 6666666666 ettteteete aftafsfssr ■t 3 3 f f e f t f } 7} �� - e e e e t t e e to p tsfF3ftttsfj w 51 : R' flflflil3 } �'� 51 �"'^"� pB ff f•tffttt a�}g !1..111141 � �66a 5666663!66 r,I!� A,I Nil �}1 �NJ WMI oNwfv*v 083 09/10/02 ZCH 2002-0028.IS-MN0.9-10-02.wrtd.doe ,�i 7a, J CITY OF ATASCADERO INTFLAL STUDY • Attachment 4 Architectural Elevations x x lR '�� I— x X1 x x ` 3 VI Fr_ V=cq F+ R®p Ix x x x 084 09/10/02 ZCH 2002-0028.IS-MND.9-10-02.wmF.doc ~' CITY OF ATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: • The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project,involving at least one impact that is a"Potentially Significant Impact"as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ❑ Aesthetics ❑ Agriculture Resources ❑ Air Quality ❑ Biological Resources ❑ Cultural Resources ❑ Geology/Soils ❑ Hazards&Hazardous ❑ Hydrology/Water Quality ❑ Land Use/Planning Materials ❑ Mineral Resources ❑ Noise ❑ Population/Housing ❑ Public Services ❑ Recreation ❑ Transportation/Traffic ❑ Utilities/Service Systems ❑ Mandatory Findings of Significance On the basis of this initial evaluation: ❑ I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment,and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared: • ® .I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a"potentially significant effect"or"potentially significant unless mitigated"impact on the environment,but at least one effect 1)has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2)has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required,but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. ❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects(a)have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards and(b)have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. / �/0/Z9-0- Warren Frace Date • Community Development Director 085 09/10/02 ZCH 2002-0028.IS-MND.9.10-02.wrd.doc CITY OF ATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY • EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except"No Impact"answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a Lead Agency cites following each question. A"No Impact"answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved(e.g.the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A"No Impact"answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards(e.g.the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants,based on a project-specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved,including off-site as well as on-site,cumulative as well as project-level,indirect as well as direct,and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) "Potentially Significant Impact"is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. If there are one or more"Potentially Significant Impact"entries when the determination is made,an EIR is required. 4) "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated"applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from"Potentially Significant Impact"to a"Less than Significant Impact." The Lead Agency must describe the mitigation measures,and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level(mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses,"may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier analyses may be used where,pursuant to the tiering,program EIR,or other CEQA process,an effect has • been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). Earlier analyses are discussed in Section XVII at the end of the checklist. 6) Lead Agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references information sources for potential impacts(e.g.general plans,zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should,where appropriate,include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. A source list should be attached. Other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. U�� 09/10102 ZCH 2002-0028.ISMND.9-10-02.wrtd.doc ' CITY OF ATASCADERO - rNTFLAL STUDY • Initial Study 2002-0035 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significantwith Significant Impact Zone Change 2002-0028 Impact Mitigation Impact Conditional Use Permit 2002-0065 Incorporation Tentative Tract Map 2002-0019 1625-1685 EI Camino Real 1.AESTHETICS--Would the project: a)Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? FJ ® F1 b)Substantially damage scenic resources, including, El D M El but not limited to,trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? c)Substantially degrade the existing visual character El El or quality of the site and its surroundings? d)Create a new source of substantial light or glare that El El ® F] would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? SOURCES: Project Description, site plan,site visit DISCUSSION: 1 a./b./c.The site does not meet the criteria for being a scenic vista, however it is a large natural area that is partially visible from public streets. The project will involve single family residential lots with 1/4 • acre minimum and the houses will be subject to design guidelines. Site improvements will include a landscaped open space/detention basin along EI Camino Real and a tradition character street with parkway planters and street trees. The project will be consistent with the character of surrounding development. This impact is considered less than significant. 1.d. Consistent with City policy street lighting will not be required on the street to minimize light and glare impacts. Lighting will be limited decorative exterior residential lighting which is not a source of significant light and glare impacts. This impact is considered less than significant. 2.AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES: In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model(1997)prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland.Would the project: a)Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency,to non-agricultural use? b)Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use,or a El El n Williamson Act contract? • c) Involve other changes in the existing environment ' which, due to their location or nature, could result in El 087 09/10102 Page 1 - ZCH 2002.0028.ISMND.9-10-02.wmLdoc ' CITY OF ATASCADERO rMTIAL STUDY • Initial Stud 22-0035 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Study Significant Significant with Significant Impact Zone Change 2002-0028 Impact Mitigation Impact Conditional Use Permit 2002-0065 Incorporation Tentative Tract Map 2002-0019 1625-1685 EI Camino Real conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? SOURCES: Cal. Dept. of Conservation maps, site plan,site visit. DISCUSSION: 2a. The,property is not prime farmland and has been subdivided into lots smaller than five acres. The site has been used for residential purposes with accessory pastures. This is considered a non impact. 2b. The site is not under Williamson Act Contracts. This is considered a non-impact. 2c. The area is within the urbanized area of the City of Atascadero and not any adjacent to farmlands that could be impacted by the development of this site. This is considered a non- impact. 3.AIR QUALITY--The significance criteria established by the Air Quality Control District in its CEQA Guidelines may be relied upon to make the following determinations.Would the project: a)Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the ® El • applicable air quality plan? b)Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality F1 F1 violation? c)Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant El R R concentrations? e)Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial E number of people? SOURCES:Air Pollution Control District(APCD)CEQA Air Quality Handbook, project description DISCUSSION: 3a. The project is located in a non-attainment air quality basin where any new development contributes incrementally to air quality impacts. The project will result in a net increase of 38 single family residences with a net increase of 380 vehicle trips per day. The residential density is consistent with the City's General Plan and EIR This impact is considered less than significant. 3b. During the grading and construction phase the potential exists to generate air borne dust(PM- 10)in violation of APCD standards. The following mitigation measure will reduce this impact to a level of less than significant. U8� 09/10/02 Page 2 _ ZCH 2002-0028.IS-MND.9-10-02.wm(.doc ti CITY OFATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY Initial Study 2002-0035 Potentially Less Than Less Than No • Signifieant Significant with Significant Impact Zone Change 2002-0028 Impact Mitigation Impact Conditional Use Permit 2002-0065 Incorporation Tentative Tract Map 2002-0019 1625-1685 EI Camino Real MITIGATION MEASURES - � � fi ,� ,, '� 2 3 b 1Theproject shall tie conditloned;to comply with all aplrcable District regulations pertalnngFto the control of fugitive-4 t(PM 10)as contained in section 6 4 of the -it Quality Hantlbook All site grading and demolition plans notes shall list the following regulations ' x $ gag i 161, A Ji- x A[I matenalsexcavated or graded shall be`suffrclently gtered to;prevent excessive amounts of tlust z U1(atenng shall occur at least twice dally wµith complete coverage,;prefera6ty fn thefate j momrng and after work is f11 ed for the day_ tncreased wafering frequency would be rettrnred whenever wind speeds exceed 15 mph Reclaimed water should be used whenever osslbie '_ s P = - B All clearing,-grading, earth moving, or-excavation activities:shall cease during periods of high winds (Le.greater than 20'mph averaged over one.hour)SO as to prevent excessive amounts of tlust. C. All material transported off-site shall be either sufficiently watered or securely covered to prevent excessive amounts of dust. D. The area disturbed by clearing,grading,earth moving,or excavation operations shall be minimized so as to prevent excessive amounts of dust. E. Permanent dust control measured identified in the approved project revegetation and landscape • plans shall be implemented as soon as possible following completion of any soil disturbing activities. F. Exposed ground areas that are planned to be reworked at dates greater than one month after initial grading shall be sown with fast-germinating native grass seed and watered until vegetation becomes established. G. All disturbed areas not subject to revegetation shall be stabilized using approved chemical soil binders,jute netting,or other methods approved in advance by the APCD. H. All roadways,driveways,sidewalks,etc.to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible. In addition,structural foundations shall be completed as soon as possible following building pad construction. 1. On-site vehicle speed shall be limited to 15 mph for any unpaved surface.' J. All unpaved areas with vehicle traffic shall be watered at least twice per day,using non-potable water. K. Streets adjacent to the project site shall.be swept daily to remove silt which may have accumulated from construction activities,so as to prevent excessive amounts of dust from leaving the site. L N. Wheel wash .rs.im y be'required when significant offsite importor`;export of fill is involved. O. All dirt stock pile areas should besprayed daily as needed.' 3c. The project will result in a net increase of 38 single family residences with a net increase of 380 • vehicle trips per day. This impact is considered less than significant with the following mitigation measures. 689 09/10ro2 Page 3 ZCH 2002-0028.IS-1JND.9-70-02.wrti.dac CITY OFATASCADERO ' INITIAL STUDY • Initial Study 2002-0035 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant with Significant Impact Zone Change 2002-0028 Impact Mitigation Impact Conditional Use Permit 2002-0065 Incorporation Tentative Tract Map 2002-0019 1625-1685 EI Camino Real MITIGATION,MEASURES Pedestrian walkways well be.provided within the protect with connections to future ommerciaf-use areas: " along EI�Carn►no Real �� � , 3 c 2 Large canopy shade trees shall be:provldeii along street frontages to minimize urtianheat bwld=up 3d/e. The project will not~be located in an area of substantial pollution concentrations nor will"it bea source of odors. These are considered non impacts. 4.BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES --Would the project: a)Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations,or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? . b)Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c)Have a substantial adverse effect on federally El El Ei protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act(including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.)through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any F-1 0 El native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e)Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources,such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f)Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? • SOURCES: 5/30/02 Kit Fox/Biological Survey by Sierra Delta Corp., 5/30/02 Botanical Survey by Sierra , Delta Corp.,6/23/02 Arbor Tree Surgery Arborist Report, Project description,site visit, Land Use Element EIR,GIS Maps U�o 0810/02 Page 4 - ZCH 2002-0028.ISMNO.9-10-02.wmf.doc 6-Aw CITY OFATASCADERO INTFLAL STUDY Initial Study 2002-0035 Potentially Less Than Less Than No • Significant Significant with Significant Impact Zone Change 2002-0028 Impact Mitigation Impact Conditional Use Permit 2002-0065 Incorporation Tentative Tract Map 2002-0019 1625-1685 EI Camino Real DISCUSSION: 4a/b. A botanical and biological survey was conducted of the site in April 2002 to determine the possible existence of sensitive species of plants or animals within the project area. No sensitive plant species where found on the site. Impacts to live oaks is covered below. The site is within the range of the San Joaquin kit fox which is listed and protected as a rare species. The site survey found no kit fox habitat features. The report concludes that development of the site will have no impact on the kit fox or its habitat. This impact is considered to be less than significant. 4c. There are no streams, drainage courses or wetlands that exist within the project area. This is considered a non-impact. 4d. Based on the conclusion of the biological survey development of the site will not impact wildlife movements or migratory corridors. 4e. There are eight native oak trees on the project site. All of the native Live Oak trees on the site that will be impacted by the development of the project but can be preserved with mitigation.. This impact is considered less than significant with mitigation. MITIGATION MEASURES . 4.e.1..` All construction within the drip lines of native trees shall be consistent with the mitigation requirements of the 6/23/02 arborist report. 4.e.2. A tree fencing protection plan shall be submitted with construction.plans and installed prior to permit • issuance. 4.e.3. All tree removals shall be mitigated consistent with the requirements of the Atascadero Native Tree Ordinance. 4.e.4. -An arborist shall be retained monitor construction,mitigations,and overall tree health. - 4f. There are no adopted conservation plans within the project vicinity. This is considered a non- impact. 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES --Would the project: a)Cause a substantial adverse change in the El El significance of a historical resource as defined in '15064.5? b)Cause a substantial adverse change in the F] F71 significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to '15064.5? c)Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological El F] resource or site or unique geologic feature? d)Disturb any human remains, including those interred El El outside of formal cemeteries? SOURCES: Phase 1 Archaeological Assessment CA Signer&Associates 4/6/02, Project description, • site visit, Land Use Element EIR 33 09/10/02 Page 5 _ ZCH 2002-0028.ISMN0.9.10-02.wmF.dx OaCITY OF ATASCADERO y INITIAL STI.IDY • Initial Study 2002-00355 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant with Significant Impact Zone Change 2002-0028 Impact Mitigation Impact Conditional Use Permit 2002-0065 Incorporation Tentative Tract Map 2002-0019 1625-1685 EI Camino Real DISCUSSION: 5a-d. According to the Phase 1 Archaeological Assessment no cultural resources exist on or near the site. This is considered an non-impact. 6.GEOLOGY AND SOILS --Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or V\Jl F1 death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. • ii)Strong seismic ground shaking? D iii)Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? iv) Landslides? F-1 El b)Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? c)Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, F] or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on-or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 1171 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code(1994),creating substantial risks to life or property? e)Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? SOURCES: GIS Soils Map, Project description, site visit,Atascadero Zoning Ordinance • DISCUSSION: } 6a. The site is flat with shaly loam soils. This impact is considered to be less than significant. 6b. The site is relatively flat with limited grading required. The risk of erosion is low. This impact is v92 09/10/02 Page 6 - ZCH 2002-0028.ISMND.9.10-02.wmf.doc CITY OF ATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY Initial Study 2002-0035 Potentially Less Than Less Than No • Significant Significantwith Significant Impact Zone Change 2002-0028 Impact Mitigation Impact Conditional Use Permit 2002-0065 Incorporation Tentative Tract Map 2002-0019 1625-1685 EI Camino Real considered less than significant. 6c. The soils have been found to be suitable for construction. This impact is less than significant. 6d. The soil expansion index is moderate and will be addressed by during building construction. This impact is less than significant. 6e. The project will be served by sewer This is considered a non-impact. 7. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS-- Would the project: a)Create a significant hazard to the public or the El ❑ E] environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b)Create a significant hazard to the public or the F1 El ® E environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or El El m acutely hazardous materials,substances,or waste • within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d)Be located on a site which is included on a list of IVRIJ hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan area or,where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people living or working in the project area? f)For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, E D would the project result in a safety hazard for people living or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with El an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? • SOURCES: Project description,Atascadero Fire response maps,Atascadero Land Use Element EIR. l UJ 09110102 Page 7 - ZCH 2002-0028.IS-MND.9.10-02.wmt.dac CITY OF ATASCADERO IMTIAL STUDY • Initial Study 2002-0035 Potentially Less Than Less Than No significant Significantwith Signiflcant Impact Zone Change 2002-0028 Impact Mitigation Impact Conditional Use Permit 2002-0065 Incorporation Tentative Tract Map 2002-0019 1625-1685 EI Camino Real City of Atascadero Chief Building Official DISCUSSION: 7a. The project will not involve the transport or disposal of hazardous materials. 7b. The project is located in the vicinity of the US 101 freeway which routinely is used by trucks transporting hazardous materials. This impact is considered to be less than significant. 7c. The project will not emit hazardous material. 7d. The site is not listed as a hazardous material site. 7e,f The project is not within 2-miles of an airport. 7g. The project will not impact any evacuation routes or plans. 7h. The site is within a moderate risk wildland fire hazard area. Roof construction requirement and Atascadero Fire standards applied during building permits reduce this impact to a level of less than significant. 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY--Would the project: • a)Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? El lz�sl b)Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or 1,71 interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g.,the production rate of previously-existing nearby wells would drop to a level that would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c)Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on-or off-site? d)Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner that would result in flooding on-or off-site? e)Create or contribute runoff water which would ® 0 D exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? • f)Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? El F F] ® ' 004 09/10102 Page 8 _ ZCH 2002-0028.IS-MN13.9.10-02.wmf.doc 60—k- CITY OF ATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY Initial Study 2002-0035 Potentially' Less Than Less Than No • Significant Significantwith Significant Impact Zone Change 2002-0028 Impact Mitigation Impact Conditional Use Permit 2002-0065 Incorporation Tentative Tract Map 2002-0019 1625-1685 EI Camino Real g)Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area E ® El as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h)Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures ® El that would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ® E loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? El 0 SOURCES: GIS FEMA Maps, Project description, site visit. DISCUSSION: 8a. The project will not discharge any wastewater. 8b. The project will be served by the Atascadero Mutual Water Company. The construction of 38 single family units is consistent with the General Plan and will not create a significant impact to ground water supply. 8c. Development of the site will result in substantial grading and earthwork. This has the potential to • create erosion and off-site siltation. A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)will be required to be approved by the RWQCB prior to construction. This impact will be less than significant following mitigation. 8d/e Grading and drainage plans for the site indicate that minimal changes will be made to the site and the area of impermeable surface will not be significantly increased. This impact is considered less than significant. 8g/h The proposed development above both the 100 and 500-year flood hazard area. This impact is considered to be less than significant. 8i. The project site outside of the area subject to inundation if the Salinas Dam above Santa Margarita were to fail. This impact is considered to be less than significant. 8j. The site is not subject to seiche,tsunami or mudflows. MITIGATION MEASURES 8.c.1. A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)will be required to be approved by the RWQCB prior to;construction. 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING -Would the project: a)Physically divide an established community? El El El b)Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy,or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project(including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning • ordinance)adopted for the purpose of avoiding or 09/10/02 Page 9 ZCH 2002-0028.IS-MND.9.10-02.wni.doc CITY OFATASCADERO INTITAL STUDY • Initial Stud 2002-0035 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Study Significant Significant with Signiflcant Impact Zone Change 2002-0028 impact Mitigation Impact Conditional Use Permit 2002-0065 Incorporation Tentative Tract Map 2002-0019 1625-1685 EI Camino Real mitigating an environmental effect? c)Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? SOURCES: Land Use Element, project description, City of Atascadero Zoning Ordinance DISCUSSION: 9a-c. The proposed use is an allowable use at this property and does not conflict with the General Plan or any known habitat conservation plan for this area. 10. MINERAL RESOURCES --Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral El El resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? • b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important 1 E mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? SOURCES: Project description DISCUSSION: 10a-b. The site is in a residential area with no unique mineral resources. This is considered a non- impact. 11. NOISE--Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive El ® R ❑ ground-borne vibration or ground-borne noise levels? c)A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise 0 F] R levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d)A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ® ❑ ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels • existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan nr whores ci inh n ninn hac not hppn nrinntpri within twn ®_ j b Page 10 09/10/02 ZCH 2002.0028.ISMND.9-10-02.wrtd.doc �1011 -^ CITY OFATASCADERO u INITIAL STUDY Initial Stud 2002-0035 Potentially Less Than Less Than No • Study Significant Significant with Significant Impact Zone Change 2002-0028 Impact Mitigation Impact Conditional Use Permit 2002-0065 Incorporation Tentative Tract Map 2002-0019 1625-1685 EI Camino Real or,where such a plan has not been adopted,within two miles of a public airport or public use airport,would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f)For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people living or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? SOURCES:General Plan Noise Element, Project description DISCUSSION: 11 a/b The project will be located along the EI Camino Real which is a source of significant noise that could.affect lots 1 and 31. The following mitigation measures would reduce this impact to a level of less than significant. 11c. The project will not produce noise. 11d. There is some potential for a temporary increase in noise generation or exposure to noise as a result of a construction activities. Compliance with the City's noise ordinance will reduce this impact to a level of less than significant. 11 a/f. The project is not in the vicinity of an airport. MITIGATION MEASURES 1 .1 1 t landsca ed berms along the west sides of lots 1 and 31. �J�S� 11.a2. Construct all housing will stucco siding and concrete or tile roofing materials to reduce interior noise: 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING--Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, El E F 0 either directly(for example, by proposing new homes and businesses)or indirectly(for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b)Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, ❑ ❑ ❑ necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c)Displace substantial numbers of people, El E necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? SOURCES: Project description, City of Atascadero Land Use Element EIR DISCUSSION: • 12a-c: The project will provide additional housing. These impacts are considered beneficial. - 097 09/10/02 Page 11 ZCH 2002.0028.IS-MND.9-10-02.wmrdoc CITY OF ATASCADERO T' INITIAL STUDY • Potentially Less Than Less Than No Initial Study 2002-0035 Significant Significant with significant Impact Zone Change 2002-0028 Impact Mitigation Impact Conditional Use Permit 2002-0065 Incorporation Tentative Tract Map 2002-0019 1625-1685 EI Camino Real XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES a)Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities,the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? El E ® ❑ Police protection? ❑ ® E Schools? F F-1 M ❑ • Parks? 0 M 0 Other public facilities? F1 El SOURCES: Project description, Land Use Element EIR DISCUSSION: 13a-d. The addition of a 38 new dwellings at this location will not significantly alter the need for any public services beyond what is anticipated in the approved Land Use Element EIR. This impact is considered to be less than significant. 14. RECREATION -- a)Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational El VS1 facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities that might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? SOURCES: Project description • DISCUSSION: 14a. Residential development of the site has been anticipated by the General Plan, including the parks and recreation element.That element provides policies and programs for development of 09/10102 Page 12 ZCH2002-0028.IS-MND.9-10.02.wmf.doc CITY OFATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY Initial Study 2002-0035 Potentially Less Than Less Than No • Significant Significant with Significant Impact Zone Change 2002-0028 Impact Mitigation Impact Conditional Use Permit 2002-0065 Incorporation Tentative Tract Map 2002-0019 1625-1685 EI Camino Real parks as needed. The project will provide a 1/2 acre open space parcel along EI Camino Real. This impact is less than significant. 14b. Construction of the open space feature will occur on a flat parcel next to the EI Camino Real. No additional adverse impacts are anticipated. 15.TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC --Would the project: a)Cause an increase in traffic that is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively,a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or • highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including El F-1 R either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d)Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature(e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e)Result in inadequate emergency access? E f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? 11 R g)Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? SOURCES: Project description, Site plans DISCUSSION: 15a. The project will take primary access from EI Camino Real which is an arterial street. The project will generate approximately 380 daily trips which will not significantly impact an arterial street and is consistent with the assumptions of the General Plan. This impact is considered less than significant. 15b. The 380 daily trips will not exceed any standards. No impact. 15c. No impact 15d. There are no increased circulation hazards associated with the project. No impact. • 15e. The proposed loop street design will provide adequate emergency access. 15f. No special parking requirements. 099 09110/02 Page 13 ZCH 2002.0028.IS-MND.9-10-02.wrrf.dx 61-1 SkI-1 CITY OFATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY • Potentially Less Than Less Than No Initial Study 2002-0035 Significant SigniNcantwith Significant Impact Zone Change 2002-0028 Impact Mitigation Impact Conditional Use Permit 2002-0065 Incorporation Tentative Tract Map 2002-0019 1625-1685 EI Camino Real 15g. Class II bikeways will be provided along EI Camino Real. Beneficial impact. 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS --Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b)Require or result in the construction of new water or ❑ F1 El wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities,the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c)Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the 0 project from existing entitlements and resources,or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater E EJ treatment provider that serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted ❑ ® El capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g)Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? FJ LLN-J SOURCES: Project description, site plans. DISCUSSION: 16a. The project will be served by City sewer lines that are currently planned for installation. Less than significant impact. 16b. The project will be served by the Atascadero Mutual Water Company which has adequate facilities to serve the project. Less than significant impact. 16c. The project will require minor grading and drainage improvements due to the Large lots. Less than significant impact. 16.d. Adequate public water supplies exist to serve the project. Less than significant impact. • 16e/g. The project will be served by City solid waste pick-up services. Less than significant impact. 0Q Page 14 09!70!02 ZCH 2002-0028.I8-MND.9.10-02.wrtd.doc 4441 .Rik' CITY OF ATASCADERO IMTIAL STUDY Initial Study 2002-0035 Potentially Less Than Less Than No • Significant Significant with Significant Impact Zone Change 2002-0028 Impact Mitigation Impact Conditional Use Permit 2002-0065 Incorporation Tentative Tract Map 2002-0019 1625-1685 EI Camino Real 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE-- a)Does the project have the potential to degrade the El 1 quality of the environment,substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b)Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable?("Cumulatively considerable"means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects,and the effects of probable future projects)? • c)Does the project have environmental effects that will F-1 0 El cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? SOURCES 1. 6/23/02 Arbor Tree Surgery Arborist Report 2. 5/30/02 Botanical Survey by Sierra Delta Corp 3. 5/30/02 Kit Fox/Biological Survey by Sierra Delta Corp 4. Phase 1 Archaeological Assessment CA Signer&Associates 4/6/02 5. 2025 General Plan, City of Atascadero,2002 6. Zoning Ordinance, part of Municipal Code, City of Atascadero, as amended through 2001. 7. Project description: includes: Tentative tract map Written project description Preliminary grading plan Master Plan of Development 8. 2025 General Plan EIR Crawford, Multari, &Starr, certified 2002 5. CEQA Handbook,Air Quality Control District,August 1995 6. Acoustical Design Manual, Brown-Buntin Associates, 1991 7. Noise Ordinance, City of Atascadero, 1992 • 8. Flood Insurance Rate Map, community-panel number 060700 0004 B, Federal Emergency Management Agency,January 20, 1982 Page 15 09/0/02 2CH 2002-0028.IS-MN0.9-10-02.wm1.doc CITY OF ATASCADERO 1MTL4L STUDY • 9. Trip Generation, Institute of Traffic Engineers 10. State Water Resources Quality Control Board, Basin Plan 102 Page 16 09/10/02 ZCH 2002-0025.IS-MN0.9-10-02.wmF.dac • ATTACHMENT 4: Draft Ordinance A DRAFT ORDINANCE A AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO AMENDING THE ZONING CODE TO CREATE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT 17 FOR USE IN THE RSF-X ZONING DISTRICT (1625 / 1683 / 1685 El Camino Real, APN 049-102-008, 009 /Gearhart) WHEREAS, an application has been received from Kelly Gearhart, 6205 Alcantara Avenue, Atascadero, CA 93422, (Applicant & Owner), to consider a project consisting of a zone change from RSF-X (Residential Single Family 1/2 acre) to RSF-X/PD-17 (Residential Single Family with Planned Development Overlay #17) with the adoption of a Master Plan of Development, and an 40-lot residential tract map, on a 9.90 acre lot located at 1625 / 1683 / • 1685 El Camino Real(APN 049-102-008, 009); and, WHEREAS, an Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration 2002-0035 were prepared for the project and made available for public review in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and, WHEREAS, the site's General Plan Designation is SFR-X (Single Family Residential 1/2 acre [4 dwellings/ac max]); and, WHEREAS, the site's current zoning district is RSF-X (Residential Single Family 1/2 acre); and, WHEREAS, General Plan Policy HOS 1.1.4. allows for the creation of single family planned development projects with a maximum density of 4 unit per acre in the SFR-X land use; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to enact this amendment to the Zoning Map to protect the health, safety and welfare of its citizens by applying orderly development and expanding housing opportunities within the City; and, WHEREAS, the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and public notice of • environmental documents, as set forth in the State and local guidelines for implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) have been adhered to; and, _ . 03 Draft Ordinance A October 22,2002 Page 2 of 5 WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed Public Hearing upon the subject Zone • Change application was held by the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero at which hearing evidence, oral and documentary, was admitted on behalf of said zoning amendments; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, at a Public Hearing held on October 1, 2002, studied and considered Zone Change 2002-0028, after first studying and considering the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project and recommended approval, and, WHEREAS, the Atascadero City Council, at a Public Hearing held on October 22, 2002, studied and considered Zone Change 2002-0028, after first studying and considering the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project, and, NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council takes the following actions: SECTION 1. Findings for Approval of a Zone Change Creating a PD-17 Planned Development Overlay District. The City Council finds as follows: 1. Modification of development standards or processing requirements is warranted to promote orderly and harmonious development. • 2. Modification of development standards or processing requirements will enhance the opportunity to best utilize special characteristics of an area and will have a beneficial effect on the area. 3. Benefits derived from the overlay zone cannot be reasonably achieved through existing development standards or processing requirements. SECTION 2. Approval. The Atascadero City Council, in a regular session assembled on October 22, 2002 resolved to introduce for first reading an ordinance that would amend the City Zoning ordinance with the following: 9-3.662 Establishment of Planned Development Overlay Zone No. 17: (PD17). A Planned Development Overlay Zone No. 17 may be established in the RSF-X single-family residential zones on lots with a net acreage exceeding one acre. The maximum density within the planned development shall not exceed a gross density of 4.0 units per acre. The following development standards shall be applied to all projects within Planned Development Zone No. 17: �Uq Draft Ordinance A October 22,2002 Page 3 of 5 • (a) A Master Plan of Development of the site shall be approved. All construction and development shall be done in conformance with the approved Master Plan of Development. (b) No subsequent tentative parcel or tract map shall be approved unless found to be consistent with the approved Master Plan of Development. (c) A proposed planned development project shall consist of no fewer than four (4) residential units. (d) A parent lot or lots shall have frontage on a public street. (e) Each dwelling unit shall be subject to review under the City's Appearance Review Guidelines. (f) Building setbacks shall be as follows: €Front yard at 15 feet ¢porch N. ............................... .... .... Front yard at 20 feet welling :Front yard at <25 feet garage Side yards 55 feet :€ :Sidewyard„':..w..»., 12f feet,,,.,_.v,�.,,,,... � ;,,(corner lot) ea-yard�� '10 feet :::Accessory:......,�.: 5 feet ,.,..,....-.,-,.,, :structure side ::and rear yards Garages shall be recessed from the front of the residence by at least ten (10) feet. (1) Physically Unique Sites. Sites with one (1) or more mature trees, steep slopes, riparian areas and/or some other unique physical characteristic are not subject to the above setback requirements provided the following findings are made: (i) that flexibility from the above setback standards is necessary to enable the environmentally superior design alternative; (ii) that at least fifty percent (50%) of each individual lot will be landscaped; and (iii) that at least sixty percent (60%) of the net area of the overall site will be landscaped. (g) Building coverage (residence plus garage footprint) shall not exceed • thirty-five percent (35%) of the individual lot area. Landscaping shall , constitute a minimum of forty percent (40%) of the lot area. The X05 Draft Ordinance A October 22,2002 Page 4 of 5 measurement of landscaped areas shall be exclusive of driveways, patios, • decks, etc. (h) Two-story residences shall have a second floor that is limited to seventy- five percent (75%) of the gross area of the first floor inclusive of the garage. (i) All mechanical equipment, including HVAC units and utility meters, shall be screened from view from adjacent streets and properties. (j) Exterior fencing shall be consistent throughout the project. Design and appearance of fences and/or walls shall be compatible with the design of the dwelling units. (k) Accessory buildings (sheds, etc.) will be allowed; however, the footprint of such accessory buildings will count toward the maximum percent of allowable building coverage. (1) Each proposed lot shall have a minimum frontage of sixty (60) feet measured at the 25-foot setback line. The minimum net lot area shall be 6,400 square feet. (m) Parking for two-resident vehicles shall be provided in a garage with minimum interior dimensions of twenty (20) feet by twenty (20) feet. One guest parking space of at least nine (9) feet by eighteen (18) feet shall be provided on each individual lot. The driveway area may be used to satisfy.the guest parking requirement. On-street parking shall not be used to satisfy the • parking requirements. (n) All frontyards and street facing sideyards shall be landscaped. (o) Individual trash collection shall be used for each residential unit. Provisions shall be made for storage of trash cans within the garage or fenced area. (p) All utilities, including electric, telephone and cable, along the frontage of and within the PD shall be installed underground. (q) Alterations or additions to established dwelling units shall be subject to the density standards of the underlying zone and shall be reviewed pursuant to the City's Appearance Review Guidelines. (r) No farm animals may be kept on a lot. SECTION 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective a 12:01 a.m. on the 315 day after its final passage. t • 106 Draft Ordinance A October 22,2002 Page 5 of 5 • On motion by Council Member , and seconded by Council Member the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ADOPTED: By: Mike Arrambide, Mayor Attest: • Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk Approved as to form: Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney l07 ATTACHMENT 5: Draft Ordinance B • DRAFT ORDINANCE B AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO APPROVING ZONE CHANGE 2002-0028 THEREBY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP DISTRICT OF APN 049-102-008, 009 RSF-X (RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY 1/2 ACRE) TO RSF-X/PD-17 (RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY WITH PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY#17) SUBJECT TO A MASTER PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT. (1625 / 1683 / 1685 El Camino Real, APN 049-102-008, 009/Gearhart) WHEREAS, an application has been received from Kelly Gearhart, 6205 Alcantara Avenue, Atascadero, CA 93422, (Applicant & Owner), to consider a project consisting of a zone change from RSF-X (Residential Single Family 1/2 acre) to RSF-X/PD-17 (Residential Single Family with Planned Development Overlay #17) with the adoption of a Master Plan of Development, and an 40-lot residential tract map, on a 9.90 acre lot located at 1625 / 1683 / 1685 El Camino Real (APN 049-102-008, 009); and, • WHEREAS, an Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration 2002-0035 were prepared for the project and made available for public review in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and, WHEREAS, the site's General Plan Designation is SFR-X (Single Family Residential 1/2 acre [4 dwellings/ac max]); and, WHEREAS, the site's current zoning district is RSF-X (Residential Single Family 1/2 acre); and, WHEREAS, General Plan Policy HOS 1.1.4. allows for the creation of single family planned development projects with a maximum density of 4 unit per acre in the SFR-X land use; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to enact this amendment to the Zoning Map to protect the health, safety and welfare of its citizens by applying orderly development and expanding housing opportunities within the City; and, 108 Draft Ordinance A October 22,2002 Page 2 of 5 • WHEREAS, the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and public notice of environmental documents, as set forth in the State and local guidelines for implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) have been adhered to; and, WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed Public Hearing upon the subject Zone Change application was held by the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero at which hearing evidence, oral and documentary, was admitted on behalf of said zoning amendments; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, at a Public Hearing held on October 1, 2002, studied and considered Zone Change 2002-0028, after first studying and considering the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project and thereby recommended approval, and, WHEREAS, the Atascadero City Council, at a Public Hearing held on October 22, 2002, studied and considered Zone Change 2002-0028, after first studying and considering the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project and the Planning Commission's Recommendation, and, NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council takes the following actions: • SECTION 1. Findings for Approval of a Zone Chante Creating a PD-17 Planned Development Overlay District. The City Council finds as follows: 1. Modification of development standards or processing requirements is warranted to promote orderly and harmonious development. 2. Modification of development standards or processing requirements will enhance the opportunity to best utilize special characteristics of an area and will have a beneficial effect on the area. 3. Benefits derived from the overlay zone cannot be reasonably achieved through existing development standards or processing requirements. 4. Proposed plans offer certain redeeming features to compensate for the requested modification including a 1/2-acre passive park. SECTION 2. Approval. The Atascadero City Council, in a regular session assembled on October 22, 2002 resolved to introduce for first reading an ordinance that would rezone the subject site consistent with the following: 1. Exhibit A: Zone Change Map • SECTION 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective a 12:01 a.m. on the 31" day after its final passage. i 09 Draft Ordinance A October 22,2002 Page 3 of 5 On motion b Council Member and n • y seconded by Council Member the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ADOPTED: By: Mike Arrambide, Mayor Attest: Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk Approved as to form: Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney X10 Exhibit A: Zone Change Map ZCH 2002-0028 Existing Zoning: RSF-X Proposed Zoning: RSF-X/PD-17-1 1625/1683/1685 El Camino Real APH 049-102-008,009 ..:................... ............::::....:,,:::..,:::::::........... X. .:?:..: :.:::..:.::.:.::?:: .< iiii:.::.::..:.:::".::. .. :.i .. ; :..:, ..: .. '::.. ':. .. .. :::::.::::::::.:........ ..iii:.i:.:::!.i:.:iiiiii:.::.::4iiiii:.::::«::i::.i:.::4'???4}}}}:{?•}:.}}}}}i$ii}i}ii: � `�..:.:'..'.�.��..+::: - - '.:iii::;;iiii:iiiiii:.i:ii:.::�:.i:.::::::.i::i:: :C�ii}}}}}iii}}Y:•}}}:.}}}:Qii?: ::::::::::::::::::....... ::.:v:�:is:i:::::: ri::.:::.�::::::':::::::.:...::i::��:�.:ii'r`ii::••�:: J� .:.. .•: �::::::..:::�::.�::.�:::::::::.�::.�.::::ii:�i::.:. :.:::::::::::...:...::�::: ::::i:: 9.:/":::.�':iii'rii::�:ii;:y;:;:`::::::i:f;::yiiiiii....:...... .: :: :<.::...•: .:.:. - {;f� ...�j}. :�::>:.;>:::.:. .irt,.... .. KFi:'i� i%ii�i��i� i>�:�:=i i�i�i�i5:: i�i�i� i:=:�?�:::3:Y}::cr:'t�[:% 4' •}:• ..: '::!.:•'iii:iiiiiiJii:iii::i;;�::�iii is { v; ::i::;:, :.•r „ .�.vvv.•:.v.•.v. .; '•i::i:::,'::::::.�:::::::::::::.��: ............:. '.:.;.f � , :........ ::::::::.�::::::::.�::::......::•....::::::::.�:::...:i':i;:•:iiiiii:�+ i :•} '... •.�:':::..: 4f :........ .......................::::::::::::. .:.�::::::::.:..:::::::::::::4\.::::::.::.:::'.:..'11��':;:i::i::::i:::%::i:::i:::::i:::::i::i::::i::::j:::..�:/:w}i}:vi':i::ii .: •:{ ;',/�,/F:�:::i:.;.:.;. : •. :'f'.' '•ff.•• .:( :!:iiii iii:�i:4ii:�::•:is iii?ii:?:::......... 1'ib�:iiiiiii;"::<::::::::::::::.�:::iiiii.:}:4:?Y.�iiii: ;;. �.:;} : ,$,.. . . ..ilii;:,:;.iiiiii: : :.:;;;;;i;.> ':>:...... .:;:;::..... ...;;:;.;:: r....:::>_: ::>::i '.• '.i:.;iia.:::':>::>::::;;::>::>:::::;::...::z.::.:.:t :vf f F. :S tt'•. �J .f r.•.r .sfi :::.'iiiiii:'.:::::. f .............. .... . 4. XX , ,: ................:.:::.�:::::::`iiiii..:::::.:::')v:iii.i::• •ii.,..............ii':•:::::..':::i:':: .i•: '��:�ii:�:�:�"�ii::2::�:�ii}.. .:.:•.::is is::.. '::'.;.;.: '. '� ,..♦:v:r .. ...............r::::.�::::::::':::::4�:<�:2;. :.:.:...:..... .:': :. f :•.v v v •:. .................................. <::::: ...w. :ii..., 4i:1r'�.: �:''�V'�ii:f'�;2::i:<:iiiJi:� •.f•. .. iii:: : .s: s ..:r:: .�, :Y rf:.... .:•;:;;•;ii:::.;iii;>::;:<.:::...:. :.�':::.�::::....... . :�......... FS :::::::::.(:..i:.iiiiiiii:.ii: .v.v. :::............ ................. iiii: .................. :.;.:,.:. •....:,.,. ..�: .... ::::::�::::::::•: iiii................ .............. ............. j ............. ............. .,.:.;.:.:.;.. n. ................v:..:::.:::. ........... ....... .iiii;.; ...... ..:.............. .,......).. '.iiiiii:• ::.::....,.............. ............. ...........:. } :.:,.. ..... .:::::::::::::::..,�............. iiii::•. .......... ............. :::::::::. . ..... :iiiiii:�i' .. .... ..... ................. .............. ...... ,........ .. ..........n.:::...... .�iiiiiii'i:�:�y . : .. ... .: ....... ............... .....................J?......... ....... .... : ...... ................J.'r............... ....,........... ......".;.i;.;.;.: .. ........,.................. ?E :- _ j ............. •iiii::: :.:d`iiii:�:�i .:.:. �:?• S' {,F..:............ :-;: ..2..: • .:.;_a([. ....... ....................... .iiii:::•:::•.... ... ..... :v::::::.:.JF::::.::::::::v:::::: .,�::::�:::::�•'::iiiiii ii���. %:j:i:: S..;.:-: i ), .::• i•i:: ?;:;;::.::::::::::::: 4 iiii:.....•............. . ::i:22.'::::iiii: .. f�:�:: :n; ,::::::::::. .. :G:�:: gF:: :�i. :�i: .:::is iiii:�A+iis».... �` .iiii:.:: :: .J'.i:viii!:•..F:`�.p:ii iiiiiii`/.�:�.'�i�iiiii:v:::::.�::..:.........."=.i:[.iiii::. iC �:::.:. ..... ...... .::S::iii:' X. '...:.:.:::• K:...............r.......J.. ..� ............''• i:;i ...,., .:::l .:.:.:..,.,.,. .:.:.:; s .s .iiii::•:S :• .::.;.....Y ....... ........ ..... .:�:�: .,.,.�.�:�:�. :�:�:: S.iiii::•:f_ ..:�•:::ii:{u.G". ::':: ".: s,:::. iiii::•::. iiii.. ::•::: :. :;:;.:;.:.(. :• is i'is!�:��::' :�:-- e`q/� 'i:'�........: •:.y:r•::. ... ,.. iiii•.:....... :. :•• S ..: $ ...::i,,^♦ S.. :.>:......... ..5... ..:::•: iiii....... . ..... �:r:;.< ;:;':: .,. ...� .'�. . ::: :: ::;:::iiii::io-i• k' 'ia:':•i:•Y::'rk:+';.»>:.>.:.i:.i:.i;iii;isa."o'.."ii:;{:::::.��::::::.�::::i:.>:.i:.i:.':.i>:;-i:;oii: ;>::... --;iiii::,.::::::::.:. .:.:.:-:.: ::....:.... :: iiii: :... .....: ...... .:., .,..... .....:::. . -.-._.:. .....5 ,.$:.........: ... ........ :>•. ..:. .:::.......... '...isiiiiir.:::.:..:�._::::.:..:i.2iir:::�,�;z.;:?,:";` i::{ j, ...�s ..S.'- .::.?a S:::•:!:::.: :� �:5�:.�::�::::.�::::.�� :�ii�'<oiiiiiiiyi>i»ii:�i;. �. �::' a.., :.::::a :,.:. -_> _._iiii. ........... §...... <.i�:;;•;: <>;�.:,!';•..... .::?�.::::::::::..�.:::::::::.'{.i:.i>i:.i:.i:..: �.. . ... ':�wu ...... <i..:........ �3 iiii: iiii:::?•.':�:: '?v.4 v.:...... .. Q �$Y[. 4:. V't:�."::2::•:iiii•. ... titititititi^. ::::::::::. ...... � S iiii•r::::.'. J:::::r}!:.:::..::::�,.:. :.:::.. ::::::::::::. ............:....... ............. ......::::::...... :.>:- ..S ............ .:�•:. �:::.:.:..:�: S, •}}}:4:4>•' .......•Y!C............ ;{<{{;?{;{;a',�;:;<?::. :�:::::::::::::: ..: �:.�.�:,:...... :................ � � "S?'�"�'%aiii::'siii:;;::;:; :.�.�: :..... ..:�::.. .:}•iiii�.::. ..:•Jf ........... k 4 .............. ...... ....$ Y •v:::::.::i::::� W:::::::::.v: iiii:. .:. .:::::::::.�.�: f: .. ......... ...... .. .....r..... 4 iiii:.:... ..... ...... .............. ::::::::::::.�::{�.:: ""'""'''` :!•i iiiiiiiii:i::ii:iiii:..':'. .-:.:.:....:.......: ( .......... .'::4!F;n;:::::::::: :i}}}.::iiiiiiiiii:4:i:!i:•::'ii:Siiiii::i i:! pp 1...f..........) .iiii::: ................... .. ........... :iiiiiiii::�::�::i:.:�::::::�: ................. ...,� ...:::...:..,.,.;.;...: .'::ici ii::�:i:'✓SS g ............... <{?•iiii?«•:c' iiii:::{:::•• {{??;{.:»:.::•:;:;:::•::iiii:•iii:<::_�:.::}:�::::::::.�.�::::.. -:�::.>:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::f�:�. •};•:�%:.i:.ii:is is i:.i:>.. - .........✓:..:•::•.�^iiii}.. ::::::::::::. .:-:..'.v.iiiiii: ..... ......... . .. ..:.�.�: ::iiii:.. .... .: .....-:. iti4?ii:•}:t.::,�::i.::iiiiiii:[:. :::4:�iri�'::iiiiiiii:�i:�.�:i::ii. .- ......... .... .......... .,;iiii:••:.: ..... ... .:. a?;�:::-::.; :. ::: .............. ........... -iiii:::.'i»'•..::::::::::;�5<;';;;,:;;i:::.;:::. .t ":: :«{c{;<;;•' :is ff�::.,". gg - :::�•:• .....:. ............. iiii::: .:i:.2:::::::;�`.::�:::;:.:;.i:oi:>::i;,..i;:is i::.... F::>:.:''%::::L:�i::�:: ;::`;;iiii'..'iiii:: .............. � ....... ..... ... :. .iiii::•.::•fi:: ....... ?.i::�:.i�)j:;::;i;ii.!:::'iiiiiiiii;:r.;}iiii::i,-. �,.. __... ........ ...... :.iiii.,..._: :..:: .:::.:: ............... ..... ::.: ::»»»iiii.: . .. ::;:.;: :::•YY:.;•.::;:.>::. ' ,.:�` `.,``�.::. ::. ;.:::::.::::::.:•,�.iiiiiii;:.;{.ii: iiii::. .........................:-. �`�,. .ii:: :..:..:.:.: ..........ii..�,. :.;.. '•'''•''�".�''•... ...............��•::::::::::.:::::.:�::::::::::�:{>:::i:>::<:::i:%�iiiii:::;>,:=:.;i:iiiiiiiii::. Ste'..... is iM ........... ..4 :. ::;:ai::iii;:cii;:- ::::::::::::•::• �.'ci:ii;ii:iir;i ;iiiiiii::.�::':;?i»i>i::%::;iii:2:iiii:h:?..... :::.. 4 ....... iiii:...:.::::::::::::. 4'Y'':::;:r:.x;:{?•Y. ::::::::::::::•: :::.. ....:::. _..................4 ...�:•;}:4i$}:• : �::::::::.�::. .............-.:::.::i!i:i?ii;iiii Li:;2:':`;%:ii>i.:. s :•iiii ;;:::::::: :..:::::::::. .. ........ .:r.,::: •iiii:. �::::•. ::o:i:i:: .. :.:::::::iiiiiii: 4................... : i:;•i:::.;":::::.:::: gg .. ..............4 '.:::•::•: : %+;;ir::iii: sS S ::,�� i>irL: .:::... _. <-;:-;:;o-:8:ilii:%�;;:,:.. ....•w'. • .:.::v:::::::t::. .. _.. .:....:.;....... .:<;•i'::•::• iri::i:.�: .. 4� �. :: .:••>:.::.>:.••}:Y�• ::•iiii•. :. 4. .... .... �. :.iiii.�..::>; :::::::::...�:�::::::.:::.:_:: :.......:j::: .iiii:: : ;;:.;: 4 .•?u•}:<+�. ......., } .......::ii>'>:�i:a>:"j>":=;ri::>:;;�;::;'::i>:�i:c>:Y:.�:�:<�>�+++:�.«oiai:.i:a $.; $ S ::::ss� ::=�'..i.ii::::::'r::i::::i:::-ii : ::�.i::i::::::i.....:. v-. v . }. ................. :.::::.::::. ;i :?�:; '�•cR"`\ S #i:? �-�:2iS+>: "N::>:�i:.>:.>:,S<.i;�.>.�:2;�:�;:=;:"�:.+::SisS 4. �:�:.::,..::Y:i<�}}Y iiii:::•.�. .i:.�:b:,;:�;i:;.i>r:i>::�:-;;;:6:2�:::.......... � ,..Sv;:;4':ii:;;:2:i:is is is':i;:::;:2: :5:#<�:-: ::>�>S>;;:..>ii;iii>i;;i: ':.iiii�^:_:::::::::. �� :• :•}:{?•: :... :;;iii}•::;.>:,. iiii: ._:::::::: : ._.,:.$s'?;;ii::;:-;;iiiiii;ii:';:;>:>:z: :::-,i!F::�:�:�••. i ;::o�?Fi.::::::::: ,s?�: :ii�S< :�i�iisiSi2::<;:._;::::: ".w; +� t ................. �• 4 F i:S '. .......:. ., •:::; •:::}:}}iiii::}•�.:iia:•::f{.;.. ..5�:::::::::.�.oi:;:tea"iii':'#:`"::::42:;'i'i;ii` :'i%;4�:i: i: :... ..:.:....:.:. iiii ::::; � .� ...'+.%.i+r.+.{+.•::J.t `2� `iiax:�.4. ATTACHMENT 6: Draft Resolution B DRAFT RESOLUTION B A RESOLUTION OF THE ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2002-0065,ADOPTING A MASTER PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT FOR THE PD-17 OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICT ON APN 049-102-008 AND 009 (1625 / 1683 / 1685 El Camino Real, APN 049-102-008, 009/Gearhart) WHEREAS, an application has been received from Kelly Gearhart, 6205 Alcantara Avenue, Atascadero, CA 93422, (Applicant & Owner), to consider a project consisting of a zone change from RSF-X (Residential Single Family 1/2 acre) to RSF-X/PD-17 (Residential Single Family with Planned Development Overlay #17) with the adoption of a Master Plan of Development, and an 40-lot residential tract map, on a 9.90 acre lot located at 1625 / 1683 / 1685 El Camino Real (APN 049-102-008, 009); and, WHEREAS, an Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration 2002-0035 • were prepared for the project and made available for public review in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and, WHEREAS, the site's General Plan Designation is SFR-X (Single Family Residential 1/2 acre [4 dwellings/ac max]); and, WHEREAS, the site's current zoning district is RSF-X(Residential Single Family 1/2 acre); and, WHEREAS, General Plan Policy HOS 1.1.4. allows for the creation of single family planned development projects with a maximum density of 4 unit per acre in the SFR-X land use; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended that a site be rezoned to include a PD-17 overlay district which requires the adoption of a Master Plan of Development; and, WHEREAS, the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and public notice of environmental documents, as set forth in the State and local guidelines for implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) have been adhered to; and, WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed Public Hearing upon the subject Zone' • Change application was held by the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero at which - +12 Draft n Resolution B October 221,2002 Page 2 of 24 hearing evidence, oral and documentary, was admitted on behalf of said Master Plan of Development; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, at a Public Hearing held on October 1, 2002, studied and considered the Master Plan of Development for Zone Change 2002-0065, after first studying and considering the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project and thereby recommended approval, and, WHEREAS, the Atascadero City Council, at a Public Hearing held on October 22, 2002, studied and considered the Master Plan of Development for Zone Change 2002-0065, after first studying and considering the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project and the Planning Commission's recommendation, and, NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council takes the following actions: SECTION 1. Findings Approval of Master Plan of Development. The City Council finds as follows: 1. The proposed project or use is consistent with the General Plan and the City's Appearance Review Manual; and, 2. The proposed project or use satisfies all applicable provisions of the Title (Zoning • Ordinance) including the PD-17 Ordinance; and, 3. The establishment, and subsequent operation or conduct of the use will not, because of the circumstances and conditions applied in the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of the general public or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the use, or be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity of the use; and, 4. That the proposed project or use will not be inconsistent with the character or the immediate neighborhood or contrary to its orderly development; and, 5. That the proposed use or project will not generate a volume of traffic beyond the safe capacity of all roads providing access to the project, either existing or to be improved in conjunction with the project, or beyond the normal traffic volume of the surrounding neighborhood that would result from full development in accordance with the Land Use Element. SECTION 2. Approval. The Atascadero City Council, in a regular session assembled on October 22, 2002, resolved to approve Conditional use Permit 2002-0065, a Master Plan of Development for Zone Change 2002-0028 subject to the following: 1. EXHIBIT A: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL • 2. EXHIBIT B: SITE PLAN 3. EXHIBIT C: UTILITY PLAN 13 Draft n Resolution B October 221,2002 Page 3 of 24 4. EXHIBIT D: LANDSCAPE PLAN 5. EXHIBIT E: GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN 6. EXHIBIT F: ARBORIST REPORT 7. EXHIBIT G: TREE PROTECTION 8. EXIIIBIT H: ELEVATIONS AND COLOR AND MATERIALS PLAN 1 9. EXHIBIT I: ELEVATIONS AND COLOR AND MATERIALS PLAN 2 10. EXHIBIT 7: ELEVATIONS AND COLOR AND MATERIALS PLAN 3 11. EXHIBIT K: ELEVATIONS AND COLOR AND MATERIALS PLAN 4 12. EXHIBIT L: COLOR AND MATERIALS On motion by Council Member , and seconded by Council Member the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: • AB SENT: ADOPTED: By: Mike Arrambide, Mayor Attest: Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk Approved as to form: Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney _14_ a Draft n Resolution B October 221,2002 Page 4 of 24 • EXHIBIT A:Conditions of Approval CUP 2002-0065: PD-17 Master Plan of Development Conditions of Approval Timing Responsibility Mitigation CUP 2002-0065 /Monitoring Measure PD-17 Overlay 1625/1685 EI Camino Real PS:PbmigSWAM a.:BUMesa Lice as:BUI&V SW&M GP:Ga rig Pent FD:Fre Depatw t BP:BUUV Pamt PD:Poke Depahnert FI:FnA Irspecbm CE Cly Fnow T0:Tenv"Ocagaky W.Wastewater F0:FhA OwXancy CA CtyAlt-W Planning Services 1. The approval of this use permit shall become final and On going PS effective following the end of the referendum period for Zone Change 2001-0028. 2. Approval of this Master Plan of Development shall be valid BP PS concurrently with the life of Tentative Tract Map 2002-0019 and then indefinitely following final map. The Master Plan of Development approval shall expire and become null and void unless a final map is recorded consistent with the Master Plan of Development. • 3. The Community Development Department shall have the BP/FM PS authority to approve minor changes to the project the (1) increase the intensity of the project by less than 10%, (2) result in a superior site design or appearance, and/or (3) address a construction design issue that is not substantive to the Master Plan of Development. The Planning Commission shall have the final authority to approve any other changes to the Master Plan of Development and any associated Tentative Maps. 4. Amendments to the Master Plan of Development shall be On going PS subjected to approval by the Atascadero Planning Commission through a Public Hearing process. 5. All subsequent Tentative Tract Maps and construction BP/FM PS permits shall be consistent with the Master Plan of Development contained herein. 6. All future development and improvements to be consistent On going PS with the requirement of PD-17 which is incorporated by reference. 7. All exterior elevations, finish materials and colors shall be BP PS consistent with the Master Plan of Development as shown in Exhibit H-L. 8. All site development shall be consistent of a maximum of 38 BP/FM PS single-family dwelling units. f 9. . All site work, grading and site improvements shall be BP/FM PS consistent with the Master Plan of Development as shown in - �i5 Draft n Resolution B October 221,2002 Page 5 of 24 Conditions of Approval Timing Responsibility Mitigation • CUP 200240065 /Monitoring Measure PD-17 Overlay 1625/1685 EI Camino Real PS:Pb"V SWkM BL:Bushm Lim= BS:BdIckV Services GP:GradN PW t FD:Fre Depatwt BP:Bukkv Pmnt PD:Poke Depabmett FI:FWI trspec5m CE Cly Er4w TO:TwpMOcagary WNWadeWer F0:Fnd Ocap Ck CtyAflm W Exhibit B-E. 10. Native oaks trees shall be preserved and protected during BP PS construction consistent a Tree Protection Plan prepared for the project. All tree protection shall be in place prior to the issuance of any construction permits consistent with Exhibit F and G. 11. A minimum of one on street parking space per unit shall be BP PS provided through out the project 12. A final landscape and irrigation plan shall be approved prior BP PS to the issuance of building permits and included as part of site improvement plan.All exterior meters,air conditioning units and mechanical equipment shall be screened with landscape material. All landscaping beneath Oak trees shall be approved by the arborist for compatibility with the tree. Provide 24-inch box street trees at approximately 30-feet on center along each side of the street. 13. Landscape plans shall include the design of the park BP PS feature. The park should include a tot lot or park designed to facilitate use by a number of different ages or activity groups concurrently, such as for small gatherings and may include small barbecues and ample seating and tables and shade tree plantings. 14. A paved location shall be provided for the storage of BP PS one trash, one recycle, and one green waste container within a designated exterior fenced area. 15. All yard fencing shall be consistent throughout the project as BP PS shown on Exhibit D. 16. All front yards and street facing sideyards shall be BP PS landscaped prior to final on house building permits. 17. One 15-gallon native oak tree shall be planted on all lots. FO PS 18. The site plan shall be adjusted as follows to minimize native IP/BP PS tree impacts: Lot 29: change floor plan to type 1 and shift away from oaks. Lot 40: change floor plan to type 4 and shift away from • oaks. Draft n Resolution B October 221,2002 Page 6 of 24 • Conditions of Approval Timing Responsibility Mitigation CUP 200240065 /Monitoring Measure PD-17 Overlay 1625/1685 EI Camino Real PS:Pb*v Services BL:Bua)=Lcww as:BuW g Services GP:Gradng Peart FD:Fre Deparhnert BP:Buirirg Perrri PD:Poke Depa brat FI:Fid Irspecbm CE:Cty Erxjreer TO:TmpMOc 4wq W&Wastewater F0:Frd O=vxq C-CtyAR-W Install porous pavers in streets and driveways located beneath the driplines of native trees. Mitigation Measures 19. The project shall be conditioned to comply with all applicable IP PS 3.b.1. District regulations pertaining to the control of fugitive dust (PM-10)as contained in section 6.4 of the Air Quality Handbook. All site grading and demolition plans notes shall list the following regulations: A. All material excavated or graded shall be sufficiently watered to prevent excessive amounts of dust. Watering shall occur at least twice daily with complete coverage,preferably in the late morning and after work is finished for the day. B. All clearing,grading,earth moving,or excavation activities shall cease during periods of high winds (i.e.greater than 20 mph averaged over one hour)so • as to prevent excessive amounts of dust. C. All material transported off-site shall be either sufficiently watered or securely covered to prevent excessive amounts of dust. D. The area disturbed by clearing,grading,earth moving,or excavation operations shall be minimized so as to prevent excessive amounts of dust. E. Permanent dust control measured identified in the approved project revegetation and landscape plans shall be implemented as soon as possible following completion of any soil disturbing activities. F. Exposed ground areas that are planned to be reworked at dates greater than one month after initial grading shall be sown with fast-germinating native grass seed and watered until vegetation becomes established. G. All disturbed areas not subject to revegetation shall be stabilized using approved chemical soil binders, jute netting,or other methods in advance by the APCD. H. All roadways,driveways,sidewalks,etc.to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible. In addition, structural foundations shall be completed as soon as possible following building pad construction. • I. On-site vehicle speed shall be limited to 15 mph for any unpaved surface. , J. All unpaved areas with vehicle traffic shall be watered at least twice per day,using non-potable Draft n Resolution B October 221,2002 Page 7 of 24 Conditions of Approval Timing Responsibility Mitigation • CUP 2002-0065 /Monitoring Measure PD-17 Overlay 1625/1685 EI Camino Real PS:Plmm SW= BL:Busiress License BS:Bukkg Swkes GP:Gra6g Perrot FD:Fre Depa hwt BP:Buking Peron PD:Poke Depa but FI:Frd Irspedw CE:Uy Er9w TO:TerrpararyOc 4xM WK.Wastewater F0:Frd Occ4xM CA CtyPltwq water. K. Streets adjacent to the project site shall be swept daily to remove silt which may have accumulated from construction activities so as to prevent excessive amounts of dust from leaving the site. L. Wheel washers may be required when significant offsite import or export of fill is involved. M. All dirt stock piles areas should be sprayed daily as needed. 20. Pedestrian walkways will be provided within the project with IP PS 3.c.1. connections to future commercial use areas along EI Camino Real 21. Large canopy shade trees shall be provided along street IP PS 3.c.2. frontages to minimize urban heat build-up. 22. All construction within the driplines of native oak trees shall IP PS 4.e.1. be consistent with the mitigation requirements of the arborist • report. 23. A tree fencing protection plan shall be submitted with IP PS 4.e.2. construction plans and installed prior to permit issuance 24. All tree removals shall be mitigated consistent with the IP PS 4.e.3. requirements of the Atascadero Native Tree Ordinance. 25. An arborist shall be retained to monitor construction, IP PS 4.e.4. mitigations and the overall health of trees. 26. A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) will be IP PS 8.c.1. required to be approved by the RWQCB prior to construction. 27. A landscaped berm shall be installed along the west side of LP PS lots 1 and 31 for sound attenuation. Planning Commission 28. At the applicant's option, the proiect shall include two (2) EJB PS deed restricted moderate income affordable units or Day equivalent in-lieu fees to be determined by staff. Deed restrictions or fees all be provided at time of final map. -end of conditions- • Draft n Resolution B October 221,2002 Page 8 of 24 • EXHIBIT B:Site Plan CUP 2002-0065: PD-17 Master Pian of Development L y i ? ' t i3l t t 5 11fest t F FA %8 ..••fit 8 0 .. -� x .. Qkyp 9 :u 11 PZA i ...... . ...... SA•:'�, < } ` ! �ftz�::,! -!�+= is ��,'. ` 1S �, { a ' ri : �. �r gg s Y o ila, y t r4sa � . t. i500.' $A 1.4 c 1 1f # ,;ipk,e �: ��w �R�• � ...� l �'9�'k � !� .. � 7RLd'114i1 i � ::{�; 7 �1R�� �� ,f)t' ; 19 Draft n Resolution B October 221,2002 Page 9 of 24 • EXHIBIT C Utility Plan CUP 2002-0065: PD-17 Master Plan of Development . . Irk } t .. :F ; pp 33 > t _Y E � -- q r i LIL�:� A r>,a•aw.��„„j, tial CRY {�/2 x y w3 . R •. .. . ��O Draft n Resolution B October 221,2002 Page 10 of 24 • EXHIBIT D:Landscape Pian CUP 2002-0065: PD-17 Master Plan of Development A. k 1.9 r 3gg g Fp rgsss max... k °£ t J < ,;fir ' 5Q Al fig- a � f ...111 $r .. .. :fiat !1� �'x' i••� .� � 4 ))� s .�. 6 .. 1� Draft n Resolution B October 221,2002 Page 11 of 24 EXHIBIT E:Grading and Drainage Plan • CUP 2002-0065: PD-17 Master Plan of Development -- .. .; r �. r s>' F 3 ...j�.............. P� F F k gg fEs { Sys < t a 3 , } • 3k f lit; r it J ' 7 Z tS 7 S - 3` -A r r Draft n Resolution B October 221,2002 Page 12 of 24 • EXHIBIT F: Arborist Report CUP 2002-0065: PD-17 Master Plan of Development Fr, T.R.,'F PA:.• )k'.,-.!!A 9I:446 $ 5'2------------ 3:?-. 3S :X c�...........................:i;2 9 ARBOR ...... TRUE SURIER1f r €`3'£733): �#':':.y.•.fi:=.�`:F}Ft,>.7.;.��%f 33'�€�f'tii)�tl:?tii' CA •.€€iEn 3't�£35... 332 FK'2s,Fz;,S"S7#€E£;U3r�ti3;.Ce--2.v:€::.4'8::0L3's nn.t4}2`.133£3 _ rfE i+i 3c €c;z.33C :E3 Y's#3. ixw iIi:Cwgh ��3't.>it':'s'3#.<s '�_ ...f.; .e>a.:.?f:3,.3i3{. s,ttF.fE. €:.,.v3i iYnf,s:i}3€i• 3•{€Et;S`E:�:3;�.:#i'•s'gL3F6334`:2ti'i;G �.."•.1#R'E3?(',£i:at 9.stJ'. `£¢.t£C.3••#.:✓ ; 2.::: .i.£3#:3i33)#...�€.',.M>tt,f,.e555? C...,cY£3e�£'t£;33:<,) - <t?.£3,, sf'[C'•..F•'t ;£33:Y:: it tZS: 'y £:£33`,.53:;347ffE333;.::31 its:3,'.:d heaut3 3o 1> <t:?r rj €33 e3,:L CafEtt}: .:t P64-3 a'S£3•six:,. i b3"x-s<?,i3 3':#s Sit L £33££ [i�;r:d. T;A 3)£+3:tftk�% fii2 .:t^.#:Si•.Si.i{} 3. .'4:;£- > f`r..#:£::.. 3 3335 if~-f:.E 3ti}:.^it:t3 `,.33#3#:33•L:3#3. 552i :3.is".::�r :':.•4;'- F"A'.&'NF^3. �€ifs.::L'i£i?;]43T:#:,:FE33:35i7w3'E,,.,.'W-.yul:�?'%#t';;3'5 on :: <., :xw'::i 3£<':�.R,'t'^Q7.•"..:It 3 ti 33.e:-£:;?i 4}e. St'.S 3f>z.'i3;;a f's3 f.'€% 3'[i; f'3 )F:3:C E's'3 -iSLt f.E£F"sf•:#i#342LE 33:k£:£f£%+fE'C3 F::i 3t'f.3;1.7#via 453<€3s3 fft:4S'ii'£i :t.}E#.• 33:3].'££:dig -, . sti.3''..,:3fi•£E3;.E:i3:�€iE3ti.t3 <E..t:'3f'.Gt":33££,:e;i't�{;...r..:�':�i33i:^•�£:..,;E3'.... ;5.:€3':'3.':££,t.tt.f•££yC4� 4i33i3:Ffi ;3f f f€3ff.:}0;:C'C'#E'ti:1 ;:r d"I.:- 2<.'er;i€ei32€3 S 3:i,e:-=i-'+-z'3 r+.2;`hmmi kx-w'.i' Ail #i'.£3i°u..5 3 Ji:'t>S:£'..t-33.3£3f i 3S 64233.w €5£7'v%3� ib:tn:_:3 {.F234 €t:3 4.££33jC•SYi£%t3`J i33+the L :c E:f'3•^<:3p1#?34 L:3 of fE#£vc'S3 :S S3i:E j< £ 3.f:3i S ist.7 1t:v :::....,;(3E..33t)£E:,{€f;xoft t>+^F%:'v'£€''£Ss s3.L ..:tb:1f.%42:F:?3F3 ^st ^,ti33 3'i£3:r#t3^ ''.•".3.#£ 3'Ek'ti's'"�r f EU f•,7 .:3`.ttf- 2.3�.�<."#:�3.4< 3:4€;�f1C3f3g. �€'..3'£`.t.3»».fi33.z£ut':=' .<....:3 ft:2t?�;ti,'i'.;-+•.ff .:i .I,<..{ .£ ,. G>..f£3�.fF333#' f?3:xnd} 8ti c4€us plm'- +.ii 3 nol:bzeiL`3we'%L''t33�3'fl. both Minor L3'..'r'..ff 3..,,i:.,.i.C.rf xxt',:3:.ist3 W E>#1E};q f 342:#3 ). 3 4 if fi)< fti 4-- 33.0>•,3 f-3;,�. � �:th.°<3'li;;•.t3'3:.tc3.T,fi,£td"t`r;t:C:':'afi.'i' 3F 3.^kL:3f 324 i�':.;55i3;•',F:}e<i,'i%:i't: ;'.i.:RL:e:3;.•.::#5"s�. %A£'ii3.''t::.�.<f�3:}#:u:;s i:72<.5:.F3i)£`.:;3'3,'�,.'i3?�t1f3}'i:t:.EL`:3<s;?j<.•`.i3::£fiy S.•'::£ti f:t3f.:••t:":' ti:;f;3,£f.£it)f5.,.,3t]€<,.s..Cst:,t 3:.•:€#V it3 3' €3;iat`• �5:-,f #w't•ii4r"-4°'ssSi{+•�.F3.5%'�•33.^>.i '>i'3?Fi:.:f£33. • t 123 Draft n Resolution B October 221,2002 Page 13 of 24 • €33� iTr3rlift]�Cfrffi2:iKFs3tg43S3 iSG�££Xf�V, e3333�xrc�}tR;Y :ori #°fijt sxf?;ii3rf{ Xt E ti33, f3-�fe3i is rezomm orcli±t':. The�{�'�Eft�.€)dl tr.�. ca3�ai Hers t�,�fi�r�s x! immi s x d 33ii23t�'L£ a#F.3.Cf€x ra F�33 t3viT3;C€E c c S 3+xC€ffpJ fL bl t 3+t4> F i 3 IS 33Y£ :�...36'r tICtIC1l s� tvrF i32gFiif C2c `3'3 xE.5 3EbS3318'3R?3 d>0f3#3ti.... $'##E3�d3'fSff?? 3ke1i*?33 n?8351;ff`:: 3 . Rf1QFF3�S3fFt~3� €te�E�a33Ett&AFf# R3u;38 $33" 33# S4'bf3f�3i:dfF3t$fk ar.8f v?Cih,33 G3igfoL£i3ti3 E E35w !f 3 3U Eb i�F i3 3 'rrESs s 91s rrfas FS1t f ti33#siEtf,fii,r :E'E�r 3EF9, r4 x b it#E.r�nr��3rE1#�s3#a Eall .... ' a sYsssn �or3e................L3rfsh+ , tfi f;g fGoE�s, 'sss tr1 afEu eLiysfC.aksffFEsiif??-feri ipII re Er.� e ' EE°eR33f 'x'3'Y 3'S 139 8tts.+ 7< .................._ .. gee `,f°4533"�`:Sf+'s.MVlf {t33i'�+ f:.61f1&�t3+�iCE3?-fafff�YE,� �?3,7333 f tY:�SYff f$S1G3'�t3:}3R };,ie Oak roils :s to#fru �38i3tEg :: $�3 y7tgEF.Ec +.Y.3i�83-e f.+ft�JlrE'7 3`G fE3'Es fRi tt<tfi3CilL`3x:1`S�E iL+9tC1t'r��'R'7 E,.371c^.t'~ juvw??Bi;Exit t<sfvd�3 E rsfP n ay 3 3 ° 5 �s_x3 3 E^f3f Ss?E tof.e3ot Lt$Gf3.f�9.�g : #3?sem #�7?4 +3i3Ft�t73: f2aikfFgs • yO..}3#S �w -- --i— �F: 24+' f;.:2 �i'..G'{$?E33ii7EE383?3G`+ ii33'l'3.7`3 etxilEtCa Ciu$S1�J H3'4333� i. .11�?if3fGn iTe3?rE't.+ i3rd .,l;?$iEEfrtif,'i3`�E!rlF 4 " �3e! r0r�s aia3Ey 41tREE#xgtE.� 3 Ea?E�fiu° x#x, c3ss of �EEar €i�'G �K Ov sfl3 �£3?EFtEF�E333r G° G�r� 3 Y1dtg �tFiff�E1#3raf i E is E E $$ },1r",si (3G21f; 3'34�itiGCk a�'33?'i:3U'"°E�1E3333C3:? Ciarz �tkE"+3??G� #3>33 L73 t $9F.e''c3 CSV 37EF? 5 et+Q33:f1{eE 3xFY3 i.:33'f 37LZFE3�i iFks?uL` C'�f3�F '3'Cidt3GEF�267 eit� 1M1 LSa ;t3JLri3.%i. L£33L�#Ii2i t....l?�`: i 2 Draft n Resolution B October 221,2002 Page 14 of 24 during the dry season,deep root irrigation should occur prior to construction. The pruning is necessary and should reduce the likelihood of major branch failure that occurred to trees three and four. Steven G.Alvarez,Certified Arborist 511,Arbor Tree Surgery Chip Tamagni,Certified Arborist#6436 A,Arbor Tree Surgery s • i 125 Draft n Resolution B October 221,2002 Page 15 of 24 EXHIBIT G:Tree Protection • CUP 2002-0065: PD-17 Master Pian of Development 1,•. �.: ail g I in gli ns.•c.•••..m..••{•al i l tl� ° 1 S° a R. •y a 3] tl •° 1 1 �i: 1 ! �� I f ea ! I RO i I— I b OP 8 1 1 I 2 �ae#� lYY • N gi — �j N 1A l 1 r �. X2-6 � # +.�:? t4v♦:� �k '�'C,^.'�t�%��f,'�''b`t�f;{h'�,fs{},..:" {'��ah�x 4 \4 n +:;'•. .arc?+ %a •'�,o a `+� ::5:.'r :t'�.4 ..�� '2.",?.` }} :`^"Ck\` :.:v,:i'''�","'�'•+.','•':;;ti fir.:<� p:,C: w♦�: k.N.`r..R `'J\l,' \:dan�;. \•:i4«i �t:n '}�' :2?j 'r'•.Y`Ul .0\;{ l• {$T4Yv:},,i{v'v,}� •,''�f':..K.\n3.Y+v:1:, CY{.v�,•(; C+..?tiy .Yp\,, 2v.Y J,: ;::..i;:{.+a{}T\.1. :+:.4':}?:t. :�`.i {,\\ .,`';♦.:Y?v$��7�zw+.:v`23{�,::\..5\�C{:.4\-T:.Yv ,...r.^}i{:',{?^n'{ {'i'tr Y•:S T::.c.:h}... ♦ .:7 S.♦ ♦.♦....b.:�,?�:?`a+Y +` :h. .r..� ,��`;`..�.{aiS:`�4Ft: c�: ..�, r a.: vat+�`3a. .4c��� 4�,4'•;i.{.;�o;a.:"a;r ":Y. �K:v:�G,:•4�♦.+�;t:?:. �'4c Z.9`' " }\#k.. 4 . �.. ti {.i; \♦ ' ` ♦+`y:Y ?�• {: `C� �' , 4 } 'aYYT:T:••• :.. is T: 4 iii } �:• ,��.v.. ' :♦ , ..♦.v:::::;v:::tr n� viT iiTJ,v, .}vY:�'{tiv� vii:C? ...................... , V: n4j iti{ \., h ?�1 !.c{?+?v:��{::tai•}'4`.n;n,. ♦♦)"c,CvFvi i��.4va�n1{,v,:i:�%�:{;:�A•{vim a{.\:�i4v{n♦�i v'.}"''vvr... +} t;;4}?�•riJj'v:�::;#1�\t;v{i���.4'i±•An�i�v���:u�'''.;W.+ �} f . tia• �a' µ}t• .•/.? � ----------- Or JAY] Xx 1+4:\w' .}.{•iri�iC}irwJv�.v v..�.. , `,ii+X.YT:::ii{•Yi;•T:}::.a.... .... ......i:#::'ii. ':\:.....jiii\?\i:•: ... v'U4Z':•'r,:nTY' vvriT rv�T. 4 '4)ij• } i` ...t. 1 .{'�'."{`\ii::•:{:;)<i;{{zlL,.:ii`"}}�,:x�i{1i.T{Y4{:nvJ `.:'. T. •.}i:\nth:}::#$'tCi:i'ii�i\;...\T:f:;T.},C�'.�4r:..:: l Draft n Resolution B October 221,2002 Page 17 of 24 EXHIBIT H-1:FLOOR PLAN • CUP 2002-0065: Plan 1 /PD-17 Master Plan of Development .... t �. Lill �. T aYn ' } .21 t 'z t t } . .. :. :. .! .. . '. .f` ....... :: Draft n Resolution B October 221,2002 Page 18 of 24 • EXHIBIT 1:ELEVATIONS AND COLOR AND MATERIALS CUP 2002-0065: Pian 2/PD-17 Master Plan of Development Tapered porch Lattice gable columns with vents with stone base craftsman eave brackets .F.r iN ,:J/:�•YA 11 F.. 'a'"',c}}Jr.+.' r,}�°,.:ib;:�:•, �'••;,• -;::.rc-fir/ f o-iix• I I ................. 4 :• ii:i•:::h:.:iii:.::.::.i:�::::�:�i:-::�::-iiy::;?i>:�i:<niii:•i: :::::::::::::................. :...:...................:............................ ,. .. •:J{vw.-i '." ?J;}.:: .}v.�::.}iii% ,Y {�'t'::::.x y ..o g� i }'� •di VOM .. ^si..2A. 'Y,'{%a': ••• '4k• :�p�'i :Y :x:+•.+.d:;" .+;�,.,:+ •'��F,+,,rxi�:; Y/� ,{xfi,•j.�,•,:nf/•• ..�i>:•75. :' - ? �•�' ,t..,,`•...,'::. .;.:'C „/•s'+ ai +'+rrF••'• YfOfrr Y,�::. .... ....:'.'"�:t - ... YoL6.4'o;c.,�J r :J ::::.. #JSta. :3•y,... ''' ..::::•:},}.i:.cq :t i::�': Lap siding with Exposed rafter Double hung corner trim tails widows with trim Raised Porch •. • '",<. T Tt without railing � � ( kf '� (min 8-inch above � `b +` i . �Y� ,f :! grade) ¢�t_ Rol illgivamougg; ................ ......... .......... ......... Architectural treatment of all ' .. ..::rr elevations .} MIN AN.01L I t r ;.. r ..::c3:•:y.;�::..• Lzt ..... ��j3T.-E � t�.� r�-;•� F�� �j •� �t i�.Y?-'� "��7 f • ,� �' .: .:.- ��.,. f`�r iF _ _._.._-------------------------- ia Garage . architecture to (�0j' r _ n �,' Draft n Resolution B October 221,2002 Page 19 of 24 EXHIBIT 1-2:FLOOR PLAN • CUP 2002-0065: Pian 21 PD-17 Master Plan of Development E. Q: 4 -- -- :� i j : I .. _. .... ...1 ,`tet ay Draft n Resolution B October 221,2002 Page 20 of 24 • EXHIBIT J:ELEVATIONS AND MATERIALS CUP 2002-0065: Plan 3/PD-17 Master Plan of Development Raised cover Lap siding stoop ,�• ���irk , E^ ' .,> ;,�,;rwc> sesta f fy�'r-•..at, • +S'�••.ii:t\{ai:�i:t:rr �� ....G.rff , r Bit . ...:Y:;;.;: •:`:;••1^t.;'3.',r?:'•>,:";::::::z.. •: t;fG' t ::}:.t•'"�:?�ff`r};i':'"t ;i}}.. •:rifx :::.::.::.:.................................................::::.::. ........::: ::.:::::. ':::::::.�:::::::::.ii:::....;iin}};w:::::.•;v:::::n .::•::.:........:::-ij::}ii:::.':::::'}:�ii:�i:�i i+tiii"i:�:�::�iti:;:i;::: .........::::::: ...:•::::.::... ..... }iii}::.::::::: :f..;� :Y.ik.:.\:4r .G...:y}.I, $:r,tt.`•'rf.�.;;..:. .?•.' Y.frri, fi.K:..;:i i: -w:{2iF,'{2';i'Ii:;:`�++:w:::%;c` ..r3.:::::..::..:.:::...:.:::: ' :S:•:•Y:av' .c...;>:}..:w:::<: .'�k:�::,t.,^`.'r,�:r:r`ff:}':.::......�::::::::::::.�::::: :fn ,L•.ax. ::::i; :o .},.wsx:xit;.:{.:{.',:;�>:;2:5:..::' ft ;ir.:::� ;:.>:::...........:::::::::::::::: .up:: Y'•L;c./.,a,•j:.:: ..•�rY{?;'txY:.'•• 2' • :: :::.;vi... ...;�. ... ........{r'... .:.. ... .:my\'Q•$,:: :::i.'.:.i iii:::'it.;`... .:t\fiw�iii': ...,.:'. :cf' :: ,::::. ;.; .;; ::::}}:>:}.; ..:•rte::::;; :;.:�;. a:;: ..iii :}:;>,,. a •,.• f ,:. }r:fi:+ i:;";;::... ..: .;>::- '::�>:;>}::r.;.:- ....:. ;":Ca;;:;.;:t:::.-::•::.;-::;::�:<:;:�':�%?:�:ro-:?r.,v........... ' ... :�x-.Y.'a.•�Yr. 'a.5�+•�r.frt;;r•. ..... ..,•.$.,r�..:'?:}u. ,{ f.!c: }: ......................... �: ............ •ti�G. .t'{v`}:tt?}�:ar '•t:;}:;:,.`• r'-'• :<;;}.t%Y.•fi S±t ..a,:.>}::: - '�:#? ':�?•}}}:?:}:-;::;i:::.^.::R�;;:2:;;:::;:;::?:::<: :;:y' ?C4y�c•, •}.�+?.;;fry,}••r:/o',,•�,'•r;:�:% ..............::..::::.::.::::::.:::::n::::::::::::::.::v.- :{.:i.:...-:v>:-:v;.•i:i;tti•:is y-i}i}.}:}:i:•;........... �? f. ::.}%.::^:^iiiii::v:.�:::::.::::::::.::::.:::::.:�:::?. ................................... :..... .......................... :.%fffjK:};ff: .f ;n{{;j,\:•::::.f:, f:,:•::i::-: �v�{{y,.�`X}y?If Double hung ' widows with shutters-and ��x�� '«�- %, �•_ colonial . . u Dediment trim Brick accent t� + siding t lM�' � ''i'u v'r'- .f� } �'gppp�.( �[v• ?"� •�rr:: �Y�,-. y� ... R3Q17y�,1,��E33y$y. tT�ft-1•tl.' �Xpeppmpla�4p �y�pp ' .{A;;:.;:'{'iiij��f a3{',. .., •; }::'r3a' }' :�{+aggy • :}{}:. ��asrn,... .,{,,,• \tfry•.ar:'<;f•t•rr•' aCi'. ♦ b FLF Pool, �. ; t - 'rpi•Nv ... _ r,. t Y { t P'-' /''��' : './�: � �'7 '� " ':.,••'+'3?':�i••`''a}+o-''!':' ?l•}Y;� Y.�ti 8E f: a zt U 017 Garage elevations Architectural � s �'' �i fT a }i' Z architecture to ` `� t ) ,` } /_ J treatment of all =' `� �� � _ '� 1 -% - -- <.. _ _ __1--------------- -... �?�, Draft n Resolution B October 221,2002 Page 21 of 24 EXH1131T J-2:FLOOR PLAN • CUP 2002-0065: Plan 31 PD-17 Master Plan of Development .._...................._............................................................................................................................................................_.._....._. ... 1E ..�*N (m l R9 ... tom• I � � `2�:� . • ., s } Ipti -$y .... 7. S ............. .. .. .. t . Draft n Resolution B October 221,2002 Page 22 of 24 • EXHIBIT K:ELEVATIONS AND MATERIALS CUP 2002-0065: Plan 4/PD-17 Master Plan of Development Exposed rafter tails ...r.•i.::%:::i:::i3r:;... } 1' f. ::3f'}i'}f.j'{�r.... '{: {J:i:':?: ::::iso::y_:::_:';?:ii;ii:%;::•.:{:. i •ti-.......... ....................: is?{t-?}}...: .:::::::v>:.,, -:::;:-h...•:•.�.:.;...;. :.�:::::::.�n}v:•�;::v is::::.::: •'k �fiiiiiiii?iii•' 4 . ........ ::nom.: {, 4-; Double hung Raised porch widows with tapered Double Eave columns Beams .......................- ............................. _ __ ............................... . . ........ , A .•ti:: y� 4 ' .%"iF'V 1. E }:•} ::5;>.y:k%::;;:>.•.,..'.,, { of Nr.}I 'i:?�'.::y}��:.x:y}:; ::i;:;::%%y,:•;.j}.Y: ?::�"�'f�:iYii:;?:ii:�:',py�p :! }�pj{:{,�. ' :;:�'}R�S -�+f:�}i"v:+S�':J:�%'':S`•:::::j;%:}r'�,:,"'• •}Q::, '.'.';ri/2y:. .:•.:rn.�:......v:.: is ' ........... .. ... is%:ii:v:}:?•}}+ <:;%9.4:i.}.+i:': .. %S'::<:k::k•.,••rY::i.'.::;;�•••''•':�:-'.'.:i.'•{%:•�•'L•,:ii:vi'p'�ii:::':;:.. } yp }i r Y _ 0 'tY 6 } c: i t - Ni —^ ----•- ----------- ---- ... air•r i(' f�TillArchitectural '` kl `�' `} �' "' ! F Garage —. �.....-- --- _— treatment of all �"�` a elevations architecture to - Draft n Resolution B October 221,2002 Page 23 of 24 EXHIBIT K-2:ELEVATIONS AND MATERIALS • CUP 2002-0065: Plan 4/PD-17 Master Plan of Development k F. ... .•W ... .: .. . � .�. .!; .� " .. r O SA�L'YAi' St0 9 A #f ,\ f ray s. � -► j Draft n Resolution B October 221,2002 Page 24 of 24 • EXHIBIT L:COLOR SCHEMES CUP 2002-0065: PD-17 Master Plan of Development XX O - y�♦ � fvr . f}i:..•.}:fJ.:.:..:x fy.:x •v': {!��''i::':{f.?.}}:.:•YiJi•'r:?� ..................... ••:f,.;:•}:•.:::f/.?Qfi:fy��J.:••::.•}+n•:. '1�"H.t:t�•.}j:::::}::f:::..y: .f.. ttif i:'•:.•:•�.:x':v:::}: ::}�jrl:.�•}"t rlV.�{.r:��r�:•i?�., . % � Jf.:•.:•rfj:;'��i;.J:•.'• '/}:ih:!:::::}.x.}...fir...: .}.. {.ff f?r�X•ii:%:: ............. +•.:••••?�:�:?:.��:�t.:'v.;:•ri•:y ATTACHMENT 7: Draft Resolution C • DRAFT RESOLUTION C A RESOLUTION ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2002-0019 THEREBY ALLOWING AN 40 LOT SUBDIVISION OF APN 049-102-008 AND 009 CONSISTENT WITH THE PD-17 MASTER PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT CUP 2002-0065 (1625 / 1683 / 1685 El Camino Real, APN 049-102-008, 009/Gearhart) WHEREAS, an application has been received from Kelly Gearhart, 6205 Alcantara Avenue, Atascadero, CA 93422, (Applicant & Owner), to consider a project consisting of a zone change from RSF-X (Residential Single Family 1/2 acre) to RSF-X/PD-17 (Residential Single Family with Planned Development Overlay #17) with the adoption of a Master Plan of Development, and an 40-lot residential tract map, on a 9.90 acre lot located at 1625 / 1683 / 1685 El Camino Real (APN 049-102-008, 009); and, WHEREAS, an Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration 2002-0035 were prepared for the project and made available for public review in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and, WHEREAS, the site's General Plan Designation is SFR-X (Single Family Residential 1/2 acre [4 dwellings/ac max]); and, WHEREAS, the site's current zoning district is RSF-X (Residential Single Family 1/2 acre); and, WHEREAS, General Plan Policy HOS 1.1.4. allows for the creation of single family planned development projects with a maximum density of 4 unit per acre in the SFR-X land use; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended that a site be rezoned to include a PD-17 overlay with a Master Plan of Development allowing an 40-lot subdivision of the site; and, WHEREAS, the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and public notice of environmental documents, as set forth in the State and local guidelines for implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) have been adhered to; and, :J6 Draft Resolution C October 22,2002 Page 2 of 18 • WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed Public Hearing upon the subject Tentative Tract Map application was held by the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero at which hearing evidence, oral and documentary, was admitted on behalf of said application; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, at a Public Hearing held on October 1, 2002, studied and considered Tentative Tract Map 2002-0019, after first studying and considering the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project and thereby recommended approval; and, WHEREAS, the Atascadero City Council, at a Public Hearing held on October 22, 2002, studied and considered Tentative Tract Map 2002-0019, after first studying and considering the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project and the Planning Commission's recommendation; and, NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council takes the following actions: Section 1. Findings of Approval for Tentative Tract Map, the City Council finds as follows: 1. The proposed subdivision, as conditioned, is consistent with the General Plan and applicable zoning requirements. 2. The design and improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan and applicable zoning requirements. 3. The proposed subdivision, as conditioned, is consistent with the Planned Development Overlay District#17 Master Plan of Development (CUP 2002- 0065). 4. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. 5. The site is physically suitable for the density of development proposed. 6. The design and improvement of the proposed subdivision will not cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish and wildlife or their habitat. 7. The design of the subdivision will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through, or the use of property within, the proposed subdivision; or substantially equivalent alternative easements are provided. • 8. The proposed subdivision design and type of improvements proposed will not be t detrimental to the health, safety or welfare of the general public. � 37 Draft Resolution C October 22,2002 Page 3 of 18 • Section 2. Approval. The Atascadero City Council, in a regular session assembled on October 22, 2002 resolved approve the Tentative Tract Map (TTM 2002-0019) subject to the following: 1. Exhibit A: Tentative Tract Map 2002-0019 2. Exhibit B: Conditions of Approval On motion by Council Member , and seconded by Council Member the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: . ADOPTED: By: Mike Arrambide, Mayor Attest: Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk Approved as to form: Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney Draft Resolution C October 22,2002 Page 4 of 18 • Exhibit A:Tentative Tract Map TTM 2002-0019 "�w . ::: i X:r arc..; ceo•..-� ." �M: . ...S s r.��f>t��r � .:ei ~Yp• E?:1� \��Y.:f ';:F} ,au'' {�` yr ��+fi 'i>� I a7.`� is ♦��-i � } 3q jf f_ U'd'.. wo cp? -`F y ♦ �i 4 R aA is Rt Irl a Aq £r Ax gi w ¢K < l 1 XXL- i.i { €#3 '§Y�.�::�L;4z'� s�# '` : 2 Draft Resolution C October 22,2002 Page 5 of 18 Exhibit A-2:Tentative Tract Map • TTM 2002-0019 a.towd:Seem 4a .. .. - 3 .' C%:9 4 4�F Y R 4;fN1' ::� ::' 'j��`t � �� L� E'.� �4� •' s - Is 3 z xxzzaxssxx C Ij S 7. ... ...Cr..& &A,6:9 �cN,F4�i`tx3s lrft. 7 rig ,:2sf .,,kG � „'a,,� %C ?,>R x x ` 4 2 ra:: 4•�BoN.cNc�R� i b. M - �. tit sip :�..���F���.; �4� •t 1 :��tui 4 ' .'•9 4 y a 9 s's S 3''i � i }>o,.�. 3 + ' x 0k • Y xYx .boa x x S i x K4 4 VI rr h 4 x x T k k. K Y's t 3 cF dig' 3H s,r �_S +'moi f S .:a 2 ¢ S X.x ?�Y R��S�:$s s i < +4��ti �-. .cy�� t j---•�>xrwN:� s' x 44 E r I z 1 YAQGL Ju t! '31 3 < 3 $ :7Nb4 r p yr Draft Resolution C October 22,2002 Page 6 of 18 • EXHIBIT B: Conditions of Approval TTM 2002-0019 Conditions of Approval Timing Responsibility Mitigation 1625/1685 EI Camino Real Monitoring Measure Tentative Tract Map 2002-0019 PM Parcdnp GP:Crag Perrot PS:PbnnSWACM BP:DMV Perrot BS:DJ*Q Services To,Temporary ocq-q FD:Fie Depatrmt For.Frd o=pwq PD:Poke Depahwt PI:Prbk IffgaAmts CECIyEngiw %AW.Wastewater CA CiyAft-q AMW:Ptascadao M AMater0=M Planning Services 1. The approval of this application shall become final, FM PS subject to the completion of the conditions of approval, fourteen (14) days following the Planning Commission approval unless prior to the time, an appeal to the decision is filed as set forth in Section 9-1.111(b)of the Zoning Ordinance. . 2. Approval of this Tentative Tract Map shall be valid for FM PS two years after its effective date. At the end of the period, the approval shall expire and become null and void unless an extension of time is granted pursuant to a written request received prior to the expiration date. 3. The Community Development Department shall have FM PS the authority to approve minor changes to the project that (1) result in a superior site design or appearance, and/or (2) address a construction design issue that is not substantive to the Tentative Parcel Map. 4. The Tract Map shall be subject to additional fees for FM PS park or recreation purposes (QUIMBY Act) as required by City Ordinance. 5. The applicant shall record CC&R's for the subdivision FM subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer, City Attorney and Planning Department. The CC&R's shall identify the maintenance responsibilities of all private driveways, sewer facilities, drainage facilities, common parking areas, site lighting, landscape areas, fencing, and other common facilities. The CC&R's shall also state that each unit shall have no more than three bedrooms and that all exterior colors, exterior materials, and yard fencing shall be consistent with the overall master plan of development. . 6. The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold Ongoing CA , harmless the City of Atascadero or its agents, officers, and employees against any claim or action brought to Draft Resolution C October 22,2002 Page 7 of 18 Conditions of Approval Timing Responsibility Mitigation • 1625/1685 Ell Camino Real /Monitoring Measure Tentative Tract Map 200240019 PNt Pared Map Ps: services GP:Gradq Penn PhV ig Bp.aickv perrit BS:Biking Services TO:Terrpaary OwMa cy FD:Fre Depa6nat FO:Frd Ow4wq PD:Pelee Departmt Pt Rbic knPr s GE:Oty Engnm WrV Wa mater C ICiyPltamey AWE:Ptascadao M d Watercmp" challenge an approval by the city, or any of its entities, concerning the subdivision 7. Landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted as IP PS part of the subdivision improvement plans for all common landscape areas including the park and all street frontage parkways. All common landscaping shall be installed or bonded for prior to final map. Landscaped plans shall be prepared by a qualified licensed professional. 8. Native oaks trees shall be preserved and protected IP PS during construction consistent a Tree Protection Plan prepared for the project. All tree protection shall be in place prior to the issuance of any construction permits consistent with Exhibit C. 9. A tract map drawn in substantial conformance with the. FM PS approved tentative map, and in compliance with all conditions set forth herein, shall be submitted for review and approval in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City's Subdivision Ordinance. Mitigation Measures 10. The project shall be conditioned to comply with all IP PS 3.1b.1. applicable District regulations pertaining to the control of fugitive dust(PM-10)as contained in section 6.4 of the Air Quality Handbook. All site grading and demolition plans notes shall list the following regulations: A. All material excavated or graded shall be sufficiently watered to prevent excessive amounts of dust. Watering shall occur at least twice daily with complete coverage,preferably in the late morning and after work is finished for the day. B. All clearing,grading,earth moving,or excavation activities shall cease during periods of high winds (i.e.greater than 20 mph averaged over one hour)so as to prevent excessive amounts of dust. C. All material transported off-site shall be either sufficiently watered or securely covered to prevent excessive amounts of dust. D. The area disturbed by clearing,grading,earth moving,or excavation operations shall be minimized so as to prevent excessive amounts of dust. E. Permanent dust control measured identified in the approved project neve etation and landscape plans 3�� Draft Resolution C October 22,2002 Page 8 of 18 • Conditions of Approval Timing Responsibility Mitigation 1625/1685 EI Camino Real /Monitoring Measure Tentative Tract Map 200240019 PM:Parcd Map GP:Gra6rg Perm1 PS:PFamig Services BP:Bul*g Perot BS:BUUV Savim TO T=maty 0cc panq FD:Fre Depa bmt F0 Ftd Occ pa q PD:Poise Depa inert PI:Pubic In p vmroats CE:Cty ErVw M.Wadwder CA CiyAtt-W NAAC:Atascadero A4 W Water cWWV shall be implemented as soon as possible following completion of any soil disturbing activities. F. Exposed ground areas that are planned to be reworked at dates greater than one month after initial grading shall be sown with fast-germinating native grass seed and watered until vegetation becomes established. G. All disturbed areas not subject to revegetation shall be stabilized using approved chemical soil binders, jute netting,or other methods in advance by the APCD. H. All roadways,driveways,sidewalks,etc.to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible. In addition, structural foundations shall be completed as soon as possible following building pad construction. I. On-site vehicle speed shall be limited to 15 mph for • any unpaved surface. J. All unpaved areas with vehicle traffic shall be watered at least twice per day,using non-potable water. K. Streets adjacent to the project site shall be swept daily to remove silt which may have accumulated from construction activities so as to prevent excessive amounts of dust from leaving the site. M. Wheel washers may be required when significant offsite import or export of fill is involved. M. All dirt stock piles areas should be sprayed daily as needed. 11. Pedestrian walkways will be provided within the project IP PS 3.c.1. with connections to future commercial use areas along EI Camino Real. 12. Large canopy shade trees shall be provided along street IP PS 3.c.2. frontages to minimize urban heat build-up. 13. All construction within the driplines of native oak trees IP PS 4.e.1. shall be consistent with the mitigation requirements of the arborist report. 14. A tree fencing protection plan shall be submitted with IP PS 4.e.2. construction plans and installed prior to permit issuance 15. All tree removals shall be mitigated consistent with the IP PS 4.e.3. requirements of the Atascadero Native Tree Ordinance. 2.1 Draft Resolution C October 22,2002 Page 9 of 18 Conditions of Approval Timing Responsibility Mitigation • 1625/1685 EI Camino Real /Monitoring Measure Tentative Tract Map 200240019 PM:PacdMap sen�ces GP:Craig Permt Ps:�9 13P:ming Pema BS:li*V Senates TO:TempM Otapa cy FD:Fre Deparhnat FO:Fnat Ocapa cy PD:Poice Depah ad Pt:PL&Impro emats CE:Ciy Engi eer WAt.Wastewater CA CtyAhM ANWC:Ptascadm tvlttual Water cagX" 16. An arborist shall be retained to monitor construction, IP PS 4.e.4. mitigations and the overall health of trees. 17. A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)will IP PS 8.c.1. be required to be approved by the RWQCB prior to construction. 18. A landscaped berm shall be installed along the west LP PS side of lots 1 and 31 for sound attenuation. Engineering Conditions: PROJECT SPECIFIC CONDITIONS Drainage: 19. Obtain approval by the City Engineer of the grading & IP CE drainage plan and the storm drain design&facilities. • 20. Submit calculations to support the design of any IP CE structures or pipes. Closed conduits shall be designed to convey the 10-year flow with gravity flow, the 25-year flow with head, and provide safe conveyance for the 100 year overflow. 21. Provide for the detention of the 50 year developed storm IP CE runoff,while metering out the 2 year undeveloped storm runoff. 22. Provide drainage analysis of project storm water flows and existing storm water flow from the project boundary to Graves Creek. This project must mitigate any downstream impacts of the project storm water flows down stream. 23. Show the method of dispersal at all pipe outlets. Include IP CE specifications for size&type. 24. Acquire drainage easements where needed. Drainage IP CE shall cross lot lines only where a drainage easement has been provided. 25. Concentrated drainage from off-site areas shall be IP CE conveyed across the project site in drainage easements. Acquire drainage easements where needed. Drainage shall cross lot lines only where a drainage easement • has been provided. If drainage easement or Caltrans t approval can not be obtained the storm water release must follow the exact historic path, rate and velocity as 144 Draft Resolution C October 22,2002 Page 10 of 18 • Conditions of Approval Timing Responsibility Mitigation 1625/1685 EI Camino Real /Monitoring Measure Tentative Tract Map 200240019 pt't Pasdlap GP Gracing Pemt PS:Pixriig smites BP.Bti kV Pmt Bs:&wc^g smites TO:T-PM Ocapaxy FD:Fre Depatwt F0:FrA Ocapatcy PD:Poise Depabnat PI:Pubic Inpra mts CE Cif Eno eer M.WasteAder cA CtyAtt-W AMAIC:Atascadao M dWaterCarpay prior to the subdivision. Public Improvements and Maintenance: FM CE 26. The applicant must provide for the maintenance of on- site shared improvements.This includes roads, sidewalks, street trees, streetlights,drainage facilities, recreation areas and common landscaping.The two methods that may be used are: a. Homeowners Association.This private organization would be responsible for the maintenance, repair and replacement of the facilities. b. Assessment District and Landscape and Lighting District. Funds for the maintenance, repair and replacement of the facilities would be collected on the property tax bill and distributed to the City. 27. •A common drainage and open space recreation FM CE easement shall be recorded against the park lots on the final map. 28. All public improvements shall be constructed in IP CE conformance with the City of Atascadero Engineering Department Standard Specifications and Drawings or as directed by the City Engineer. 29. Full frontage improvements are required with this IP CE development. These include curb, gutter, sidewalk and paveout. Public Improvement plans shall be submitted detailing the design. Cross sections shall be submitted detailing the existing and proposed crossfall on EI Camino Real 30. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall GP CE submit a grading and drainage plan with a separate sheet(s) devoted to sedimentation and erosion control, prepared by a registered civil engineer for. review and approval by the City Engineer. SANITARY SEWER CONDITIONS 31. The Public Works Department shall approve all IP WW • wastewater facilities prior to construction. This includes pumps, force mains, cleanouts, manholes and ' connections. i Draft Resolution C October 22,2002 Page 11 of 18 Conditions of Approval Timing Responsibility Mitigation • 1625/1685 EI Camino Real /Monitoring Measure Tentative Tract Map 200240019 PM Parcel Map PS:PImigSanices GP:Gradng Pwd BP:&king Pmt BS:Bridm Sadces T0:Temporay0wTwq FD:Fre Depatnert FQ Frd O=pancy PD:Polm Depabrat PI:Pubic hpaemets CE Cly BVrW WW:Wastewater CA:CtyAltwq AW C:Atasca&ro khal Water Carrp" 32. Prior to recording the final map, provisions for the repair FM WW and maintenance of the paving of the private road shall be included in the CC&R's for this tract. Included shall be a mechanism to maintain the private street, private sewer, and drainage swale and structures, such as a homeowners association. The City Engineer and City Attorney shall approve the final form prior to recordation 33. Applicant shall pay sewer extension (annexation ) fees FM WW prior to recordation of final map or upon issuance of building permit which ever occurs first Sewer Connection Permit. Sewer Connection and Reimbursement fees shall be payable upon actual connection of the building sewer to the public sewer system. 34. Gravity mains and other sewer facilities within the IP WW subdivision shall be privately owned and maintained. 35. Gravity mains within the subdivision shall be eight (8) IP WW • inches in diameter. 36. Newly created lots are subject to the payment of sewer FM WW extension fees prior to final map recording. STANDARD CONDITIONS 37. All public improvements shall be constructed in FM/IP CE conformance with the City of Atascadero Engineering Department Standard Specifications and Drawings or as directed by the City Engineer. 38. In the event that the applicant is allowed to bond for the public improvements required as a condition of this map, the applicant shall enter into a Subdivision Improvement Agreement with the City Council. 39. An engineers estimate of probable cost shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer to determine the amount of the bond. 40. The Subdivision Improvement Agreement shall record concurrently with the Final Map. 41. The applicant shall enter into a Plan Check/Inspection agreement with the City. 42. The applicant shall be responsible for the relocation } • X46 Draft Resolution C October 22,2002 Page 12 of 18 • Conditions of Approval Timing Responsibility Mitigation 1625/1685 Ell Camino Real /Monitoring Measure Tentative Tract Map 200240019 PM:Pared Map GP:Gracing Pemt PS:PFamig Senkes BP:&icing Pern t BS:&i^g Smites T0:Tmp m Ocapawy FD:Fre Depart ned F0:Frd Ocapwq PD:Poice Depatert PI:Rbic Inp avernerh CE:cly Eng}reer NMI:Wastewater CA ClyAtt-" AAMC:Abscadero "A"Water Carpary and/or alteration of existing utilities. 43. The applicant shall install all new utilities (water, gas, electric, cable TV and telephone) underground. Utilities shall be extended to the property line frontage of each lot or its public utility easement. 44. The applicant shall monument all property corners for construction control and shall promptly replace them if disturbed. 45. The applicant shall acquire title interest in any off-site land that may be required to allow for the construction of the improvements. The applicant shall bear all costs associated with the necessary acquisitions. The applicant shall also gain concurrence from all adjacent property owners whose ingress and egress is affected by these improvements. • 46. Slope easements shall be provided as needed to accommodate cut of fill slopes. 47. Drainage easements shall be provided as needed to accommodate both public and private drainage facilities. 48. The final map shall be signed by the City Engineer prior to the map being placed on the agenda for City Council acceptance. 49. Prior to recording the tract map, the applicant shall submit a map drawn in substantial conformance with the approved tentative map and in compliance with all conditions set forth herein. The map shall be submitted for review and approval by the City in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the Citys Subdivision Ordinance. 50. Prior to recording the tract map, the applicant shall set monuments at all new property corners. A registered civil engineer or licensed land surveyor shall indicate by certificate on the parcel map,that corners have been set or shall be set by a date specific and that they will be sufficient to enable the survey to be retraced. 51. Prior to recording the tract map, the applicant shall pay all outstanding plan checklinspection fees. • 52. Prior to recording the map, the applicant shall complete all improvements required by these conditions of Draft Resolution C October 22,2002 Page 13 of 18 Conditions of Approval Timing Responsibility Mitigation • 1625/1685 EI Camino Real /Monitoring Measure Tentative Tract Ma 2002-0019 PM:Paw Map GP:Gradrg Pad PS:Pin"Services BP:BuUV Pent BS:Dft5 Sere TO:Temporary Ocaga q FD:Fre Depahwt F0:Frd 0=4n y PD:Poke Depa beet PI:PU*Inv aanats m Cty Btg" WV.Wastexzter CA CtyAlteney AMC.Atascadeo Mhd Water Compary approval. 53. Prior to recording the tract map,the applicant shall have the map reviewed by all applicable public and private utility companies (cable, telephone, gas, electric, Atascadero Mutual Water Company). The applicant shall obtain a letter from each utility company indicating their review of the map. The letter shall identify any new easements that may be required by the utility company. A copy of the letter shall be submitted to the City. New easements shall be shown on the map. 54. Upon recording the final map,the applicant shall provide the City with a black line clear Mylar(0.4 mil)copy and a blue line print of the recorded map. 55. Prior to the final inspection of any public improvements, the applicant shall submit a written statement from a registered civil engineer that all work has been completed and is in full compliance with the approved plans. 56. Prior to the final inspection, the applicant shall submit a written certification from a registered civil engineer or land surveyor that all survey monuments have been set as shown on the final map. 57. An encroachment permit shall be obtained prior to any work within City rights of way. 58. Prior to the issuance of building permits the applicant shall submit a grading and drainage plan prepared by a registered civil engineer for review and approval by the City Engineer. Atascadero Mutual Water Company(AMWC): 59. Prior to the issuance of bulding permits, the applicant IP AMWC shall submit improvement plans showing the distribution facilities required to serve the project for review and approval by the Atascadero Mutual Water Company. The plans shall show all facilities required for fire protection. The plans shall show all cross-connection devices required to isolate the fire protection and landscape irrigation systems from the domestic water system. Prior to approval of the water system plans by the Atascadero Mutual Water Company, the applicant • shall pay all current installation and connection fees 9odk Draft Resolution C October 22,2002 Page 14 of 18 • Conditions of Approval Timing Responsibility Mitigation 1625/1685 EI Camino Real /Monitoring Measure Tentative Tract Map 200240019 Ptvt Paw Map GP Cradrg P=A PS:Pbmq Services BP.W&V Perri BS:Buldrg Services TQ Tarpr o-vaw,y FD:Re Deparhnert F0 FrdOcapancy PD:Poice Depabnat Pt PJ*Irtpaeane* CE Uy Engwer WW Wastewater CIl CIyAltarcy AMWC:Atascadao U"Water Carpa V required by the Atascadero Mutual Water Company. 60. Prior to issuance of building permits or recording the FM AMWC final map the applicant shall obtain a"Will Serve" letter from Atascadero Mutual Water Company. 61. All water distribution facilities shall be constructed in IP AMWC conformance with AMWC standards, policies and approved procedures. Fire Marshal Conditions 62. All fire hydrant spacing shall meet Atascadero Fire IP BS . Department Standards. Planning Commission • 63. At the applicant's option,the project shall include two(21 Fly Es deed restricted moderate income affordable units or pay equivalent in-lieu fees to be determined by staff. Deed restrictions or fees shall be provided at time of final map. Draft Resolution C October 22,2002 Page 15 of 18 • EXHIBIT C: Arborist Report TTM 2002-0019 .............................. ARBOR 2 •r?.. •<'.t:E}:',�,=Sfi:3,.?3333'6 .. ....-- vx..3: y'>itcii....r.}\•.S.ts . a S. (l^•?^33;3;E.}t u '#''Sff: iL"c.}i: ;£is33.' :. ................... - }'.{} a+.3.#:ii3 ..i'.3}:'%'fASC.�{}f'i'CS.•Z.:�. ....... This f.C`•0c;.,1#5##3 #:O"dx: Li-ve Oi:fi - #52:ffC'+.} Az::#'f{:{:S WT Z?.`4?,,Vfd O},#.'#'3i.y+#'Q}i.' , ;3".:.i 1 fC.' Y:.. :.#f`#3'ms an:5 f4.i#:'3}'r;`.£tt t3#3G 337£t+'.ii:>L3i:Y±:'ii:i#'f'i?t;£f33:f#33. !eC •i> tY ;mg a324'':D#k 3,,,;y;:$.13: }..i6L..:1i..{.'.i'.}:}'t+.ti,:, s.:u.,�v'# { : iY.,�S...,{3t3$ •: *!Na3 wig C at N-m,%' i3u3rS3 •it#`}:,1 !aC;3Y1 3iSf.Fi3^7�fC4;i:3�F£F#GC vid&V-:' t ?s 4t.ft3 :t3tiff i:'S!i3 ;33"t".s•fi'.f:E233:(£2;:.`i Ilia 8}:'33...E Ne um:� "o ).:?:h.,.£:f33"..Ci#:..%i3 LCSY.2Yf3•.. .33.fi's:#3x#.'£C:C:ti:2Y�`i':?.:`.i'iY'f#,..335 i`<riL�. .:3i5 f,±i'?tPi i..., 3) }33'f:t3i3}'.'}�#:ftf'>',.f.2ii.ifi"•.t3:�£ii3i',iJi;3'tr(?{;4 t3'%,,. �}'}2#s fS:3:f;:£sns:�:}':i2 Z::":i:�.Yi}':3 1:f'$$.:i S:'.fft£U _i35 1,-t 20-101/n al #};.C':f:fS S•4i.'un. Tht 8C•:i t en t3'f:S i.ii2:Si.i71:Y CDi3$-mmid 3'ift.a S Iml i3 Ss 3}{': C2?f£ic:3 to if'3�. .}i#v Jfs:C.22 ;fiiUt j*i3££g{>�t;iff'tl'if#?5;33 C$C€3y'2 t'i3i5#7:+i}.`:kx,, vv;.t}s; }3,S':b i3•:: #3ral-i•l timt fi�7};t: . .:2^y 1,3m:*4e and 3Y;f11i)4i23;w}}yr pwt.Cid'i333S}sf2i i:�.2> M`C.`.)#3in12E333fn2`C#. . ,i£3#:}£fr 3.Ff'iCkE3•:ffs 3if!::•'::i•.3.•"..,.. .>:.:33`.Ff.°4 ri:f£'3.;1;:3'i:zY�'v,�3:. `.E:3'>:±`.1 ;n t 3�3 ✓. ��•[E3:3 S#i;fs,#}i'S Lt'1}4•a}'}}<if::`£i33'2•'S'"}3t:2f i2Y4.a's:i'3:}!L',fi£3�?•�;fiE:�:€t;33+',`F b2's?c?.*:><�?.#t>ir::s t'3:;;:;=:335; _..t'� `✓hat rt Oma£:#'. #'s3t 1 fi'c:i3:it"t9t?.:F i}Cf;:}4}%{C1:t#.7 Zut :oE';:fffe'+{:�'#ii:5:3;,f#3L'.£B••�'si3Yf{:< £f3 SCSt322 L s j3�`CR };3 ; f332:i#:'>iti�F{7#:}`..:.',3�:,✓�S3e3!?'.�<::�<:•a`tt5..'3,Y:: at t}t£:<>:i i<;3:':ii:;£Siff?-ji22G S,1}i::"s ;..#3.2:: C.[. n3fffi3"f£:31f `-f# °s.<b 333 SLfY3i int-,£Ss 7rm- f'.3.74 s3'.f:#:JYfi - i 1.:L tc'R:5+f3 T<f'sr3%}`•4•t. it3 "St3"<''{;]4mds3 ions. .}ffs;.3'i;11't;t2f:;#3>.',.' L'4' •>o-3{F"az?:}SiS; rf f3.Y:#:'rt3'•. a-,,4 v.,if,•5f \C-C;f.3:<}3.7£it�,Yi S 3;ffi h::;#4'3,r L$i}i.if33?7f E3i t %3i S nol op.-.Yetd 3Aft:m £tii/•7fi3S.t:3•`te.,?n 3,".i.:.:, 5`..lna II m 10f t:Yw+i'3%f'35f!)F;3�:Sk3i3;2:fti i•}$:i:��s!'. 2£3„EiS33£;. !1;fffiF C ,wt2 3'is"f53'ko ixt ;•ii-0 ytitQ-£, lxokt 13}.mi:c:;°{3c•-,S fi33':11110}-e" }3t,2J. jRS' ...c :--4f #tt•33:Ef-3t,t f£:5.33'# 3'£- s f-,.5%'iFf.-#S 2 �Stf3 > wi _ 5 3:3.ffs-S:33 f£t5. A 4 iiCC IV}t,km,.Y€fit reft rf r•1�,x�,.:%f, 1{u df'?3{#f.�:..Y:S7.ti:z.3>3,.£. ,7F.Y w`° Y{`K51£6iUSS^#iF37sy°.}G'.ii.,:335S f't uti£2#SFEf3?8.° S S3z°f ti:"F.;'i e:s:i.ist 31`.f 3i"s t mS s£S'.:tfSSS t • V Draft Resolution C October 22,2002 Page 16 of 18 • �?tl�rPiii3tx�2£t"�i� .3333:Y"bL`�.38#�i:FiJ33T;�:sK iE ic#«u32+"3. �'vsYC2i''�4:�.3�Sti3ii'£:3r3%£i'-i3�il�E< FL::v13,^#3'Bi.F?i�SL'G. '30 '1i`t >:3 C.IG#,uJ t� £3.s7E �#3 VSs;3tr�tcstf3i`tF#K?ri? 3C�W?X?.�3i�a3 w £h,rn.a'i.if 3 31?3 <2t �Fc32£33 � ' X23 A'kife2EG'F w. "£3I3d5'i30t# 3b9t.32�&73L`#2 �S$3722EZ'3ZY2F3i f'lat� x22siFt�Yf#£23zsItd2E�3D23 ha i323Cs.c3: $ $ nyc 3 eE 8 � .:oi tir£b x 2 j2 jiEty rr'I�ett a#f� 3................f.... t _ 21 meta 5t33riE fuer Li?333ii3c b :M t tri '�yk "x x�'> £c32 t ucituri f�r3.ei•g ry.ocaz :If+ :NSs ;)n1Y"r 3 Ef3, t r 3 E wr4;vU?d3?fii t f3 0 f3 3>3U^aOfEF 333 e"?�?t i tf?, 33 t£t�e10Ef�j%323 Mivtl�3:dj'. '#�3R''#c�FL`j21XC.r41}�##ifs'; :333SC Std ? t?i �#33i3C4? Sa3EfL'L3UYY?;f#4..i3�, ip33'51C3#L3#t P f8?,C?3t 7#1E C Cd�JUYC`:#itn 433: az ii xaatir:#�:�rev? • g?lF Ctft fi 3 3L'$'.tl 3tfs�f' e a3K d #3.3•?3'GYM ty CQ.i #1r3 ue 3ak t F &k 32.t3?3tEEtl>.t..fso233 r.2#t f3 c'�ft�ffi�C;i t� ci33 F: $ " C�£t� 53�7��.11>Ait7f�df#3£+ i3 3iE.a 3 j dig{f12 7CjC °dam 1 :� �i,i 18�ri�'E: �L& fL'3tii2�,�4 3'k'Ff E#"ali#3i s,'sf`'L<'�• t 123ryi ,f�Pp d 3# i c#, ' . E $' X3 , 2 x413331.`ti#EY '> 1 I f�SC 2>?i3VC'#33S°}rj t°.i�a32t�1 233£F AE3c SE a.3YS.f'333Y#C ?v 3:?}3C'tti�! 3:?Z2f .... sll2�::`f.3T'..?i tt-'•3Y'k'4f.3£kE�i':_..K7a'df"cL>»lfi,.:,o32F3?.�.f �.e" sih+u33A • ; Draft Resolution C October 22,2002 Page 17 of 18 during the dry season,deep root irrigation should occur prior to construction. The pruning is necessary and should reduce the likelihood of major branch failure that occurred to trees three and four. Steven G.Alvarez,Certified Arborist 511,Arbor Tree Surgery Chip Tamagni,Certified Arborist#6436 A,Arbor Tree Surgery 7 W., • Draft Resolution C October 22,2002 Page 18 of 18 • LLI Oil t R° ■ Ri 1 t -- � 1 a I I $; $;! I $X Ast� i tt�� rl 1 N eR LU p yre�1 f list It lilt 1 t. �s I t. {� 1• r I 1 ! � ,��, 1 im . .— — S z rtr5V ITEM NUMBER: C-1 DATE: 10/22/2002 Atascadero City Council Staff Report - City Manager City Council Compensation and Reimbursement RECOMMENDATION: Council direct staff to prepare an Ordinance, which sets forth compensation, benefits and allowances for elected officials. DISCUSSION: The City Council directed staff to survey.compensation and reimbursement policies relating to • City Council and place the item on the agenda for possible action. Attached is a survey of the cities within San Luis Obispo County depicting compensation and reimbursement policies. The Government Code regulating compensation is also attached. The Council Compensation Ordinance from San Luis Obispo is attached; it is the most formal policy regarding this subject in the County. The Government Code sets forth compensation levels and provides in paragraph (c) that these levels can be increased by ordinance. The maximum increase is 5% annually. A change in compensation does not apply to a council member during their term of office; it would only become effective when beginning a new term. Atascadero currently provides reimbursement for City Council related expenses through the normal purchasing policy. This requires submittal of a reimbursement form. Arroyo Grande and Pismo Beach provide a$75.00 allowance each month to Council Members to cover miscellaneous expenses. This is an automatic payment and no form is required. Most of the cities also provide health insurance benefits. Three of the cities provide full coverage; two provide fixed dollar coverage. Atascadero does not provide coverage for elected officials; the city provides full coverage for employees and shares the cost of coverage for the dependants. The maximum City cost for fiscal year 2002-03 is $684.37. The Council could set a fixed dollar contribution to health insurance coverage. f Compensation for City Clerk and City Treasurer is $200.00. These compensation rates have not been updated recently. 154 ITEM NUMBER: C-1 DATE: 10/22/2002 FISCAL IMPACT: • None, future year impact could be as much as $46,462.20. The maximum increase in compensation for Council Members is $15 per month, which equates to an annual cost of$900.00. A $75.00 per month allowance to offset City Council related costs would result in an annual expense of $4,500. The health insurance benefit would have a maximum cost of$41,062.20 per year, or $15,885.60 if only the official was covered. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Table of SLO County Council Member Benefits -2002 2. Government Code Section 36516 3. Council Compensation Ordinance from the City of San Luis Obispo o • i ti a o U 0"N o a� to U th W �-1 o to o O O =sr-a O O o o N . N fUi U U bA� p U °�' o oU otet" » o 6F? c 6s E- o, � 64Na ° � aim i � U C o o Ego . > � o C o �. o0 C'3 > CU o to toC o > 15 Vo o a� O o O �, O M p O O ON V a O O O O O M O N U 69 69 69 O N o + o o0 00 0 �'' o o r, O O o U oo C14M O �. a`69 6R 69 Oto 69 69 6R Fes(; UPI69 e.: s/ N o F.•t O s > o 0 o U o o rns 56 tom", U U +� O O a) to bA U on O O _ • BRA P. O to O cd 15 o c; a� r o H = 0 E ` N O N cto � ^d U U N N o o U 5 .-i V1 U O O N o U U ° > _ O cd O O crj.O rte+ O c� O �' bA s. 4 Q. 30 O O 64 U c "a (4=4O O D U cC q3 cd C4 to 0 10 0 U >>to 4&S ::s O �1 0' ami ami 4 U 5 M o 1, _ �vas ;3 0 ° -� W �O30 w .rA rA U sR o Udo O/ 'SS U:W Ey w o O 157 WAIS Document Retrieval Page 4 of 6 the (2) he city council may call an election to fill the vacancy, to be held the next regularly established election date not less than 114 days a er the call. (3) If thcity council does not call an election pursuant to paragraph (2) , he vacancy shall be filled at the next regularly established elect'on date. 36513. (a) If a city c ncilmember is absent without permission from all regular city cou it meetings for 60 days consecutively from the last regular meeting he r she attended, his or her office becomes vacant and shall be fi led as any other vacancy. (b) Notwithstanding subdivisi (a) , if a city council meets monthly or less frequently than mo thly and a city councilmember is absent without permission from all r ular city council meetings for 70 days consecutively from the last re lar meeting he or she attended, his or her office becomes vaca and shall be filled as any other vacancy. 36514.5. City councilmen may be reimbursed for act 1 and necessary expenses incurred in the performance of official duti 36515. The compensation of a city councilman appointed or ele ed t • office was vacated. 36516. (a) A city council may enact an ordinance providing that each member of the city council shall receive a salary, the amount of_ which shall be determined by the following schedule: (1) In cities up to and including 35, 000 in population, up to and including three hundred dollars ($300) per month; (2) In cities over 35, 000 up to and including 50, 000 in population, up to and including four hundred dollars ($400) per month; (3) In cities over 50, 000 up to and including 75, 000 in population, up to and including five hundred dollars ($500) per month. (4) In cities over 75, 000 up to and including 150, 000 in population, up to and including six hundred dollars ($600) per month. (5) In cities over 150, 000 up to and including 250, 000 in population, up to and including eight hundred dollars ($800) per month. (6) In cities over 250, 000 population, up to and including one thousand dollars ($1,000) per month. For the purposes of this section the population shall be determined by the last preceding federal census, or a subsequent census, or estimate validated by the Department of Finance. (b) At any municipal election, the question of whether city council members shall receive compensation for services, and the • amount of compensation, may be submitted to the electors. If a majority of the electors voting at the election favor it, all of the ' council members shall receive the compensation specified in the election call. Compensation of council members may be increased http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/waisgate?WAISdocID=08987325540+0+0+0&WAI Sact... 10/8/2002 WAIS Document Retrieval Page 5 of 6 beyond the amount provided in this section or decreased below the amount in the same manner. (c) Compensation of council members may be increased beyond the • amount provided in this section by an ordinance or by an amendment to an ordinance but the amount of the increase may not exceed an amount equal to 5 percent for each calendar year from the operative date of the last adjustment of the salary in effect when the ordinance or amendment is enacted. No salary ordinance shall be enacted or amended which provides for automatic future increases in salary. (d) Any amounts paid by a city for retirement, health and welfare, and federal social security benefits shall not be included for purposes of determining salary under this section provided the same benefits are available and paid by the city for its employees. 36516.1. A mayor elected pursuant to Sections 34900 to 34904, inclusive, of the Government Code may be provided with compensation in addition to that which he receives as a councilman. Such additional compensation may be provided by an ordinance adopted by the city council or by a majority vote of the electors voting on the proposition at a municipal election. 36516.5. A change in compensation does not apply to a councilman during his term of office; however, the prohibition herein expressed shall not prevent the adjustment of the compensation of all members of a council serving staggered terms whenever one or more members of such council becomes eligible for a salary increase by virtue of_ his beginning a new term of office. sta d times, a compensation fixed by ordinance or resolution. 36518. Before en ring upon the duties of their offices, the city clerk and city treas er shall each execute a bond to the city. Except as otherwise pro ' ed, the bonds shall conform to the provisions of this code re ing to bonds of public officers. The penal sum of the bond shall be ' a reasonable amount recommended by the city attorney and fixed by the ity council, by resolution, and may be changed during their terms of ice. 36519. The city council may require bonds of any o er officer or employee of the city. 36520. The city council shall approve all bonds. When approved, the ' be filed with the city clerk. t • http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/waisgate?WAISdocID=08987325 540+0+0+0&WAISact... 10/8/2002 • Excerpt from the City of San Luis Obispo,California,City Council Policies & Procedures see www.slocity.org(City Clerk page for the whole document). CHAPTER TWO COUNCIL COMPENSATION Council compensation and benefits are established every other year by Council action after the Council Compensation Committee conducts a biennial review and makes a recommendation. See Section 6 of this Chapter. 2.1 SALARIES FOR MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS Effective January 1, 2001, compensation for services rendered in an official capacity shall be provided as follows: Members of the City Council shall receive $900 per month; and the Mayor shall receive a monthly salary of$1,100. (Res. 9035, 2000 series). 2.2 RETIREMENT,MEDICAL,DENTAL,VISION,AND LIFE INSURANCE The Mayor and Council Members shall be entitled to city-funded participation in P.E.R.S. retirement. The City shall contribute$420 per month toward the Mayor and Council Members participation in PEMCHA,dental, vision and life insurance. Any unexpended amount shall not be distributed to the Mayor and Council Members in cash. • 2.3 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT Allowances shall be budgeted for the Mayor and each Council Member as follows: 2.3.1 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT For costs of professional development and educational conferences designed to improve understanding of and proficiency in municipal affairs. Said allowance shall be used for out-of-county expenses only and shall be reimbursed in accordance with accepted City Travel Guidelines: Annual Allowance: Council Member $1500 Mayor $1800 2.3.2 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES CONFERENCE For the cost of participating in the Annual Conference of the League of California Cities. The City shall also reimburse the following costs for spousal participation,which is encouraged: - Double room instead of a single room. , :.60 Spousal registration fees to attend Conference seminars(this does not include • reimbursement for recreational activities that may be offered by the League during meeting activities). -Travel expenses only if a bus,train, or plane must be used rather than a city vehicle. If the public official uses his/her personal vehicle,travel reimbursement shall be provided only the employee. Meals that spouses are expected to attend as part of directly-related Conference activities will be reimbursed at the same per diem as the public official. 2.3.3 CHANNEL COUNTIES DIVISION MEETINGS When the spouse of an official or employee is expected to attend a quarterly meeting of the Channel Counties Division of the League,the meal expense will be paid by the City with the authorization of the City Administrative Officer. 2.3.4 START-UP ALLOWANCE An additional professional development allowance up to $1,000 shall be budgeted to each new Mayor and Council Member to help accelerate his/her comprehension of municipal and legislative operations during the first 12 months following the taking of office. 2.4 CITY BUSINESS AND MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT • Quarterly allowances shall be budgeted for the Mayor and each Council Member as follows: 2.4.1 CITY BUSINESS For costs incurred in connection with official City business. Said allowance shall be used for in-county expenses and shall include all meals,tickets,periodicals, dues, subscriptions, and similar miscellaneous expenses. Quarterly Expense Allowance: Council Member $300 Mayor $450 � i 2.4.2 MILEAGE For official travel within the County of San Luis Obispo,reimbursement shall be made upon submittal of an official mileage expense form: Quarterly Mileage Allowance: Council Member $300 Mayor $450 2.5 GENERAL PROCEDURES AND LIMITATIONS Appropriate budgetary practices and accounting controls shall be established to ensure that expenditures and reimbursements are in compliance with approved budget allocations. The Mayor and each Council Member is expected to plan business activities so as to stay within his/her budget. When exceptional circumstances require that additional amounts be allocated to accounts, formal Council action shall be required. 2.5.1 ACCOUNTING An account shall be established in the name of each Council Member with all expenditures charged to the individual Council Member or Mayor. If any account is depleted prior to the end of the fiscal year,additional allocations shall require a specific action of the City Council. Claims for reimbursement as specified in Section 4, above,may be submitted monthly but the aggregate of three monthly claims may not exceed the quarterly maximum. Receipts shall be submitted within the fiscal year. The Council budget shall be available for review in the City Clerk's Office and the Mayor and Council Members shall receive periodic statements. 2.5.2 REIMBURSEMENT LIMITATION The City's adopted Travel Guidelines shall govern all expenditures for non-local professional development and conferences. These guidelines include all non-local official meals,tuition or fees,transportation to meeting sites,materials and telephone usage. 2.5.3 SPECIAL EXPENSES For occasions when the Mayor and/or a Council Member is designated by the City Council to represent the City at special meetings,reimbursement shall be made from an unallocated Travel Expense Account. s � r L 2.5.4 HONORARIUM • If the Mayor or a Council Member receives an honorarium as a result of his/her participation in a meeting or conference,the amount of the honorarium shall be deducted from the amount normally provided by the City for that meeting or conference if the City paid for the Council Member's attendance at such meeting or conference. 2.5.5 OTHER GUIDELINES Any other travel-related issue not specifically governed in this resolution shall be adjudicated in accordance with the City of San Luis Obispo adopted Travel Guidelines. 2.6 COUNCIL COMPENSATION COMMITTEE A five-member review committee shall be appointed by January 31, in even-numbered years and shall bring its proposed recommendations in resolution form to the City Council within 90 days, or no later than May 1 st. 2.6.1 MEMBERSHIP The committee membership shall have as broad a representation as possible, including but not limited to,one previously elected official,one Personnel Board member, and one citizen-at-large. 2.6.2 REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY The committee shall review the full Council compensation package including salary,benefits, expense reimbursement,professional development allowances and any other compensation provided the City Council. Review should include,but shall not be limited to: 1) compensation of Council and Mayors of cities of similar population/budget size; 2) compensation practices of both Charter and General Law cities; 3) Government Code provisions for General Law cities; and 4) Council and Mayor responsibilities in San Luis Obispo at the time of the committee's review; and, 5)any structural changes that may have occurred in municipal government either as a result of State legislation or by actions of the local electorate that may have added to or deducted from the duties and responsibilities of the Council Members and/or Mayor. �c r♦ i