Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 02/26/2002 ort AGENDA Asa C" ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 26, 2002 7:00 P.M. City of Atascadero 6500 Palma Avenue, 4th Floor Atascadero, California REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: 6:30 P.M. CLOSED SESSION: 1 . PUBLIC COMMENT - CLOSED SESSION • 2. Call to Order a.) Conference with legal counsel - Pending litigation (Govt. Code Sec.54956.9) Diamond v City of Atascadero 3. Adjourn 4. CLOSED SESSION REPORT REGULAR SESSION, 7:00 P.M.: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Council Member Johnson ROLL CALL: Mayor Arrambide Mayor Pro Tem Scalise Council Member Clay Council Member Johnson Council Member Luna APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Roll Call PRESENTATIONS: 1. Proclamation - Proclaiming March 2002, "Grand Jury Awareness Month." COMMUNITY FORUM: (This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wanting to address the Council on any matter not on this agenda and over which the Council has jurisdiction. Speakers are limited to five minutes. Please state your name and address for the record before making your presentation. The Council may take action to direct the staff to place a matter of business on a future agenda. A maximum of 30 minutes will be allowed for Community Forum, unless changed by the Council.) COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS: (On their own initiative, Council Members may make a brief announcement or a brief report on their own activities. Council Members may ask a question for clarification, make a referral to staff or take action to have staff place a matter of business on a future agenda. The Council may take action on items listed on the Agenda.) 1 . Measure A - Tobacco Settlement Funds Initiative - Council to determine a position on Measure A. A. CONSENT CALENDAR. (All items on the consent calendar are considered to be routine and non-controversial by City staff and will be approved by one motion if no member of the Council or public wishes to comment or ask questions. If comment or discussion is desired by anyone, the item will be removed from the consent calendar and will be considered in the listed sequence with an opportunity for any member of the public to address the Council concerning the item before action is taken.) 1. City Council Minutes — February 12, 2002 ■ City Clerk recommendation: City Council approve the City Council minutes of February 12, 2002. [City Clerk] 2. 22 Passenger Accessible Bus - Authorization to purchase through State Department of General Services ■ Fiscal Impact: $48,000 funded through a Section 5311 Grant, $12,000 funded through TDA funds ■ Staff recommendation: Council approve: 1. The draft Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute contracts with the State*of California for Transit grant monies and amending the Transit budget to reflect the purchase of an additional Transit vehicle; and, 2. The draft Resolution authorizing the Department of General Services of the State of California to purchase vehicles on behalf of the City of Atascadero. [Public Works] 2 3. Azucena Avenue Drainage Improvements Project • Fiscal Impact: $30,000 from Amapoa Tecorida Fees Fund ■ Staff recommendation: Council: 1. Appropriate $30,000 from Amapoa Tecorida Fees fund to the Azucena Avenue Drainage Improvements Project account. 2. Authorize City Manager to sign a Change Order for approximately $18,000 to Arthurs Contracting, Inc. 3. Authorize City Manager to approve future Change Orders. [Public Works] 4. Acceptance of Final Tract Map 2001-0015 - (Tract 2271) 3900 Traffic Way (The Lakes) (The Lakes/Wilson) ■ Fiscal Impact: None ■ Staff recommendation: Council: 1. Accept Phase 3 and 4 Final Tract Map 2001-0015 (Tract 2271); and, 2. Reject the offers of dedication for public utility easements shown on Final Parcel Map 2001-0015; and, 3. Accept the offer of dedication for Traffic Way right-of-way from Harold and Gloria Myers dated January 27, 999. [Public Works] B. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. Zone Change 2001-0019 / Conditional Use Permit 2001-0050 / Road Abandonment 2001-0007 / Tentative Tract Map 2001-0008 (Tract 2444) - . 9385 Musselman Avenue (Jim Shores / R. Thompson Consulting) ■ Fiscal Impact: The project would likely have a slight negative impact on City revenues. As a general rule, single-family dwellings require services that exceed the revenue generated by the dwelling. ■ Staff recommendation: Council: 1. Adopt the draft Resolution certifying the proposed Negative Declaration 2001-0053; and, 2. Introduce the draft Ordinance for first reading by title only, to approve Zone Change 2001-0019; and 3. Adopt the draft Resolution approving Conditional Use Permit 2001-0050 for the Master Plan of Development subject to findings and conditions of approval; and, 4. Adopt the draft Resolution approving Road Abandonment 2001-0007, a request to abandon a portion of the Musselman Avenue colony right-of-way, based on the appropriate findings and subject to the conditions of approval; and, 5. Adopt the draft Resolution approving Tentative Tract Map 2001-0008, subject to findings and conditions of approval. [Community Development] C. MANAGEMENT REPORTS: 1. 2001 Audit Report ■ Fiscal Impact: None ■ Staff recommendation: Council review and accept the audit report for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2001. [Administrative Services] 3 2. 2002 Community Development Block Grant funds ■ Fiscal Impact: $242,266 in 2002 Community Development Block Grant Funds • ■ Staff recommendation: Council forward to the County Board of Supervisors allocation recommendations for the 2002 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds as recommended by staff. [Public Works] 3. National Pollution Discharge Elimination System - Phase II ■ Fiscal Impact: $82,000 ■ Staff recommendation: Council: 1. Receive this report on Phase II of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System; and, 2. Direct Staff to begin development of stormwater ordinance and measures to fulfill the requirements of the Environmental Protection Agency's Storm Water Phase ll; and, 3. Direct Staff on a specific funding option for the program. [Public Works] D. COMMITTEE REPORTS: (The following represent standing committees. Informative status reports will be given, as felt necessary.): Mayor Arrambide 1. S.L.O. Council of Governments(SLOCOG)/S.L.O. Regional Transit Authority(SLORTA) 2. Water Committees 3. County Mayor's Round Table Mayor Pro Tem Scalise 1. Finance Committee • 2. City / Schools Committee 3. Atascadero State Hospital Advisory Board 4. Economic Vitality Corporation, Board of Directors (EVC) Council Member Luna 1. Finance Committee 2. Integrated Waste Management Authority (IWMA) 3. North County Homeless Coalition Council Member Johnson 1. Local Agency Formation Commissions (LAFCO) 2. Water Committees Council Member Clay 1. Air Pollution Control District (APCD) 2. City / Schools Committee E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION: 1 . City Council 2. City Clerk 3. City Treasurer •_ 4. City Attorney 5. City Manager 4 F. ADJOURNMENT: Please note: Should anyone challenge any proposed development entitlement listed on this Agenda in court, that person may be limited to raising those issues addressed at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at or prior to this public hearing. I, Marcia McClure Torgerson, the City Clerk of the City of Atascadero, declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing agenda for the February 26, 2002 Regular Session of the Atascadero City Council was posted on February 20, 2002 at Atascadero City Hall, 6500 Palma Ave., Atascadero, CA 93422 and was available for public review in the City Clerk's office at that location. Signed this 20"' of February, 2002 at Atascadero, California. mlv� I fil C I Marcia McClure Torgerson, City erk City of Atascadero • 5 City of Atascadero WELCOME TO THE A TASCADER 0 CITY COUNCIL MEETING The City Council meets in regular session on the second and fourth Tuesday of each month at 7:00 p.m., in the Council Chamber of City Hall. Matters are considered by the Council in the order of the printed Agenda. Copies of the staff reports or other documentation relating to each item of business referred to on the Agenda are on file in the office of the City Clerk(Room 311) available for public inspection during City Hall business hours. An agenda packet is also available for public review at the Atascadero Library, 6850 Morro Road. Contracts, Resolutions and Ordinances will be allocated a number once they are approved by the City Council. The minutes of this meeting will reflect these numbers. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in . a City meeting or other services offered by this City, please contact the City Manager's Office, (805) 461-5010, or the City Clerk's Office, (805)461-5074. Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time when services are needed will assist the City staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting or service. TO SPEAK ON AGENDA ITEMS Members of the audience may speak on any item on the agenda. The Mayor will identify the subject, staff will give their report, and the Council will ask questions of staff. The Mayor will announce when the public comment period is open and will request anyone interested to address the Council regarding the matter being considered to step up to the podium. If you wish to speak for, against or comment in any way: • You must approach the podium and be recognized by the Mayor • • Give your name and address(not required) • Make your statement • All comments should be made to the Mayor and Council • All comments limited to 5 minutes(unless changed by the Council) • No one may speak for a second time until everyone wishing to speak has had an opportunity to do so, and no one may speak more than twice on any item. The Mayor will announce when the public comment period is closed, and thereafter, no further public comments will be heard by the Council. TO SPEAK ON SUBJECTS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA Under Agenda item, "COMMUNITY FORUM", the Mayor will call for anyone from the audience having business with the Council to: • Please approach the podium and be recognized • Give your name and address • State the nature of your business This is the time items not on the Agenda may be brought to the Council's attention. A maximum of 30 minutes will be allowed for Community Forum(unless changed by the Council). TO HAVE ITEMS PLACED ON AGENDA n he Agenda must be in h All business matters to appear o t g the Office of the City Manager ten days preceding the Council meeting. Should you have a matter you wish to bring before the Council, please mail or bring a written communication to the City Manager's office in City Hall prior to the deadline. i ISI "GRAND JURY RARENESS MONTH" MARCH, 2002 WHEREAS the City Council of the City of Ata scadero .supports the Grand Jury system which includes volunteer citizens serving the County of San_ Luis Obispo for one year, after qualification by the judges of the Superior Court from a list of applicants and final selection by random drawing; and WHEREAS, the Grand Jury has a tremendous responsibility to ensure that governmental entities and prisons under its jurisdiction are performing with efficiency, effectiveness, honesty and impartiality; and WHEREAS, it is crucial that the Grand Jury carries out its responsibilities in a open,fair and non discriminatory manner; insuring that their actions are prompted by just and right causes and that the work of the Grand Jury is never plagued by political interests or manipulated by special interests or media; and • WHEREAS, the Grand Jury must conduct its business in an ethical manner recognizing it's responsibility for actions taken and that tinder no circumstances would the Grand Jury manipulate the release of information; NOW, THEREFORE, I, the Mayor of the City of Atascadero do hereby officially proclaim March, 2002 to be "GRAND JURY A WARENESS MONTH" in order for all citizens to become better acquainted with the purposes of the Jury and understand the responsibility given to and expected from the Grand Jury. . Michael Arrambide, Mayor City ofAtascadero, CA February 26, 2002 DATE: 02/26/2002 MR a " =79 Atascadero City Council Staff Report - City Manager's Office Measure A - Tobacco Settlement Funds Initiative RECOMMENDATION: City Council may determine a position on Measure A. DISCUSSION: At the last meeting of February 12, 2002, the City Council heard arguments in favor of and in opposition to Measure A. The City Council directed staff to bring the item back to the Council at this meeting for potential action to support or oppose the measure. At this time, the Council • may choose to take a position on the Tobacco Settlement Initiative. FISCAL IMPACT: None directly to the City of Atascadero. • 001 i ITEM NUMBER: A- I DATE: 02/26/2002 ia�'xi' e,s� DRAFT MINUTES iais A o 107-9 'i ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 12, 2002 7:00 P.M. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: 6:30 P.M. REGULAR SESSION, 7:00 P.M.: Mayor Arrambide called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. and Council Member Clay led the Pledge of Allegiance. • ROLL CALL: Present: Council Members Clay, Johnson, Luna, Scalise and Mayor Arrambide Absent: None Others Present: City Treasurer David Graham and Deputy City Clerk Grace Pucci Staff Present: Assistant City Manager Brady Cherry, Administrative Services Director Rachelle Rickard, Community Development Director Warren Frace, Public Works Director Steve Kahn, Police Chief Dennis Hegwood, Fire Chief Kurt Stone, and City Attorney Roy Hanley. PRESENTATIONS: 1. Proclamation - Proclaiming February 2002, "Scouting Anniversary Month." Mayor Arrambide presented the proclamation to Terry Barr who thanked the City on behalf of the Las Padres Council. • CC 02/12/02 002 Page 1 2. Proclamation - Proclaiming February 17-23, 2002, "National Engineers Week." • Mayor Arrambide presented the proclamation to Jeff van den Eikhof, Associate Civil Engineer City of Atascadero, and Vice President of the San Luis Obispo branch of the American Society of Civil Engineers. Mr. van den Eikhof thanked the Council and spoke about the many contributions of civil engineers to public health, safety and standards of living. 3. Achievement Award — From the American Zoo and Aquarium Association to the Charles Paddock Zoo. Mayor Arrambide presented the award to Alan Baker who spoke about the Zoo and its effects not only locally but also worldwide. 4. Yes on Measure A - 2002 Campaign - Dr. Thomas Hale, Citizens for a Healthier San Luis Obispo County. Dr. Thomas Hale thanked Council for the opportunity to speak on the issue and presented his arguments in favor of Measure A. • 5. Tobacco Settlement Funds Initiative - David Edge, San Luis Obispo County Chief Administrative Officer David Edge, speaking as a private citizen, expressed his opinions against Measure A. Mayor Arrambide thanked both speakers. There was Council consensus to have Measure A scheduled for their next meeting on February 26, 2002. PUBLIC COMMENT Mike Ryan, 5 1 District Supervisor, stated his opposition to Measure A, citing the amount of money going to Emergency Rooms, Health Grants and the length of time the Measure will be in effect. Eric Greening, 7365 Valle, expressed his opposition to Measure A. He felt the Board of Supervisors who are directly and publicly accountable to the citizens of the County should spend funds from the Tobacco Settlement. He stated that the • CC 02/12/02 Page 2 003 way in which the money will be spent should not be locked into a formula, but • should address changing needs within the community. I Mayor Arrambide closed the Public Comment period. COMMUNITY FORUM: Ann Ketcherside, P.O. Box 941 , Atascadero, requested Council Members Luna and Johnson work with the Chief of Police regarding the death of three women in Atascadero. Ms. Ketcherside also advised Council that the property next to the proposed Youth Center contains an environmental hazard and she would like Council to reconsider use of the site. Tom O'Malley, 6650 Portola Road, addressed the Council regarding the Smart Growth Conference he had recently attended in San Diego. Mr. O'Malley spoke about studies that indicated well planned communities significantly improve the physical and mental health of their residents. Regarding Measure A, Mr. O'Malley stated that he did not support it and feels the needs of the community are being well met. He feels that the Board of Supervisors has done a good job in balancing the delivery of treatment and prevention services with strategies that address both immediate and long term funding needs, and that there is better accountability • through the public sector. Eric Greening, spoke regarding the De Anza Trail and its history. He indicated that the National Park Service coordinates the designation and interpretation of the entire trail in the United States portion. The superintendent and new interpretive specialist will be visiting San Luis Obispo during the week of March 3`d, and will be in Atascadero on Wednesday, March 6`h. Mr. Greening spoke of several local issues regarding the Trail and encouraged all interested parties to participate in the discussions on a long-range interpretive plan for the Trail. Ethel St. John, 9780 Enchanto Road, expressed her concern regarding an unsafe street condition on the south end of EI Camino Real near the California Manor, a senior apartment complex at 10165 EI Camino Real. Ms. St. John would like to see a pedestrian crossing in this area. Council discussed this safety issue and the matter was referred to the Public Works Department. Chris Schoeker, 11955 Santa Lucia Road, proposed making it illegal to ride recreational vehicles within the City limits. He feels property owners have the right to a peaceful neighborhood. • CC 02/12/02 Page 3 004 Tom O'Malley commented that the smart growth principle utilizes many devices that are designed to slow traffic on streets similar to EI Camino Real. Additionally, • there are studies that show business is increased in areas where devices such as medians are used to slow traffic. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS: Council Member Luna requested Planning Staff look into the allegation that there are hazardous materials at the site next to the Youth Center. Mayor Arrambide stated that a citizen of the community had called him to express her appreciation for the use of Atascadero Lake by people who use radio controlled model boats. She indicated that these individuals were courteous and abided by all existing standards. Mayor Pro Tem Scalise thanked Mr. Greening for the information regarding the De Anza Trail and Mr. O'Malley for taking the time to attend the Smart Growth Conference. Council Member Clay reported on a public meeting he attended at Atascadero State Hospital regarding safety issues and history of the Hospital. • A. CONSENT CALENDAR: 1 . City Council Minutes — January 22, 2002 • City Clerk recommendation: City Council approve the City Council minutes of January 22, 2002. [City Clerk] 2. City Treasurer's Agenda Report - December 2001 ■ City Treasurer recommendation: City Council review and accept the December 2001 Treasurer's Report. [City Treasurer] 3. December 2001 - Accounts Payable and Pavroll ■ Fiscal Impact: $1,066,959.43 ■ Staff recommendation: City Council approve certified City accounts payable, payroll and payroll vendor checks for December 2001. [Administrative Services] 4. Ordinance Regulating Use of Dangerous Weapons Including Bows - Second reading ■ Fiscal Impact: None ■ City Attorney recommendation: City Council adopt, on second reading by title only, draft Ordinance amending the Atascadero Municipal Code regulating the use of dangerous weapons within the City limits. [City Attorney] • CC 02/12/02 Page 4 005 5. Charles Paddock Zoo - State Grant Funds Resolution • • Fiscal Impact: The grant will provide new revenue to the City, the total amount in unknown. ■ Staff recommendation: City Council approve draft Resolution authorizing the City Manager to apply for grant funds from the Dr. Paul Chaffee Zoological Program under the Safe Neighborhood, Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air, and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000. [Community Services] 6. Pavilion Lease Agreement - Hope Lutheran Church ■ Fiscal Impact: Revenue of $9,600.00 per year for 2 years. ■ Staff recommendation: City Council authorize the City manager to enter into a two-year lease agreement with Hope Lutheran Church of Atascadero for the use of the Atascadero Lake Pavilion on Sunday mornings. [Community Services] 7. EI Camino Real Bikelanes, Phases 2 & 3 - Bid No. 2000-05 ■ Fiscal Impact: $142,286.00 • Staff recommendation: City Council authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with Souza Construction, Inc. for $142,286.00 to construct the EI Camino Real Bikelanes, Phases 2 & 3. [Public Works] 8. Acceptance of Final Parcel Map - 2001-0020 / Tract 2166 (9244 San Rafael Road - Gearhart) ■ Fiscal Impact: None ■ Staff recommendation: City Council: 1. Accept Final Parcel Map 2001-0020 (Tract 2166); and • 2. Reject the offers of dedication for street and utilities as shown on Final Parcel Map 2001-0020. [Public works] 9. Acceptance of Final Parcel Map - 2001-0008 / AT 00-202 (3100 Ardilla Rd. - Hanson/Gearhart) ■ Fiscal Impact: None ■ Staff recommendation: City Council accept Final Parcel Map 2001-0008 (AT 00-202). [Public Works] 10. Curbaril Overlay II, 2002 Road Rehabilitation Projects and 2003 Road Rehabilitation Projects - Design and Construction Services ■ Fiscal Impact: $193,575.00 ■ Staff recommendation: Council: 1. Reallocate $217,800 in the 2001-2003 Capital Projects Program from the San Fernando Road Overlay to the EI Camino Real Overlay - Santa Rosa to Viejo Camino; and, 2. Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with Pavement Engineering, Inc. for design and construction services for Curbaril Overlay Il, 2002 Road Rehabilitation Projects, and 2003 Road Rehabilitation Projects; and [Public Works] Mayor Arrambide pulled Consent Calendar Items # A-2, 4, 5, 6 and 10. • CC 02/12/02 Page 5 006 MOTION: By Council Member Johnson and seconded by Council Member Clay to approve Consent Calendar Items # Al, 3, 7, 8 and 9. . Motion passed 5.0 by a ro/%ca# vote. (Item #A7 — Contract No. 2002-002) Item #A-2: Council Member Luna requested the comments of the City Treasurer regarding Item #A2. Treasurer Graham reported that there has been a change to the numbers for the City of Atascadero Investment Yield vs. the Two Year Treasury Yield. A site has been found from the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis where the information can be obtained in a better format for the City. MOTION: By Council Member Luna and seconded by Council Member Johnson to approve Consent Calendar Item #A-2. Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. Item #A-4 PUBLIC COMMENT Gary Kirkland, 4620 Portola Road, expressed his opposition to the bow-hunting ordinance and addressed the issues of freedom, law enforcement and safety as they relate to the issue. Russell Pierce, 7560 Castana, presented a petition signed by individuals opposed to the bow-hunting ordinance. Mr. Pierce stated that the ordinance is out of touch with sportsmen and too broad. (Attachment A) Eric Greening stated that he supports the bow-hunting ordinance as it provides ample protections for the sport of backyard target shooting, takes into account that Atascadero is an incorporated city and not wild land, the issue of wounded deer and the safety of children. Mayor Arrambide closed the Public Comment period. MOTION: By Council Member Luna and seconded by Council Member Clay to adopt, on second reading by title only, the draft Ordinance amending the Atascadero Municipal Code regulating the use of dangerous weapons within the City limits. Motion passed 5.0 by a ro/%ca// vote. (Ordinance No. 39 1) • CC 02/12/02 Page 6 0107 Item #A5 - PUBLIC COMMENT • Anne Ketcherside inquired into the amount of the grant funds and whether any of the money from the grant will be used for the three acres she would like to see given by the City for the Youth Center. Assistant City Manager Cherry responded that the funding source for the grant was the Bond Act of 2000 (Proposition 12). The amount of money received is formula driven and depends on how many accredited institutions apply. Regarding the three acres, the money if received would be spent on utility upgrades and enhancements to the Zoo and not on property. Mayor Arrambide closed the Public Comment period. MOTION: By Council Member Johnson and seconded by Council Member Clay to approve Consent Calendar Item #A5. Motion passed 5:0 by a ro/%caY vote. (Resolution No. 2002- 001) Item #A6 - PUBLIC COMMENT Joan O'Keefe, 9985 Old Morro Road East, asked how the figure of $9,600 for two • years was arrived at. Assistant City Manager Cherry stated that the fee is based on current fees for non- profit groups at the Pavilion. Mayor Arrambide closed the Public Comment period. MOTION: By Council Member Luna and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Scalise to approve Consent Calendar Item #A6. Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. (Contract No. 2002-001) Item #A10 - Council Member Luna stated that this item will take money away from the paving of San Fernando and redoing Santa Rosa to Via Camino along EI Camino. He asked whether the roadway curbs and cross gutters would be repaired, and if the issue of truck traffic would be addressed. Public Works Director Kahn stated that the drainage problems at EI Bordo and Via Camino would be given subsurface drains. Regarding truck traffic, the City is working with Union Asphalt to put a four-way stop at the intersection of Santa Barbara Road and EI Camino Real, however, the trucks coming off of Highway 101 and returning to the site have a hard time coming up the hill and crossing EI • Camino Real safely. For this reason, Union Asphalt has volunteered to realign that CC 02/12/02 Page 7 008 intersection, place a four-way stop with a red flashing beacon, pay for the maintenance of this section of the roadway and send all of their trucks (except for • those with local deliveries within Atascadero) directly down Santa Barbara onto the 101 corridor. Mayor Arrambide closed the Public Comment period. MOTION: By Council Member Luna and seconded by Council Member Clay to approve Consent Calendar Item #A10. Motion passed 5.0 by a roll-call vote. (Contract No. 2002-003) B. MANAGEMENT REPORTS: 1 . Proposition 42 - Transportation Congestion Improvement Act ■ Fiscal Impact: Potential new revenues for roads and transit. • Staff recommendation: City Council approve draft Resolution supporting Proposition 42 on the March 2002 ballot. [City Manager] Assistant City Manager Brady Cherry presented the staff report and answered questions of Council. PUBLIC COMMENT Joan O'Keefe stated that she would be voting no on Proposition 42. Mrs. O'Keefe • P stated her concern that there is no mention that more funds will be appropriated for education, health, social services, corrections and local government fiscal relief. She feels that these services are always under funded and considering California's fiscal problems she doubts that any more funds will be forthcoming. Eric Greening indicated that he would be supporting Proposition 42. He feels that the appropriate way to pay for transportation is from the purchase of gasoline but would prefer that none of the money go to the STIP and more go to public transit. Mayor Arrambide closed the Public Comment period. MOTION: By Council Member Johnson and seconded by Council Member Luna to approve the draft Resolution supporting Proposition 42 on the March 2002 ballot. Motion passed 5.0 by a ro/%ca// vote. (Resolution No. 2002- 002) • CC 02/12/02 Page 8 C. COMMITTEE REPORTS: • Mayor Arrambide 1 . S.L.O. Council of Governments (SLOCOG)/S.L.O. Regional Transit Authority (SLORTA): Met last week and submitted a request that the federal government declare Highway 1 from San Luis Obispo to the Monterey County line a scenic highway. 2. Water Committees: Met and heard reports on the Paso Robles ground water basin and Nacimiento Water Project. 3. County Mayor's Round Table: The main focus of the meeting was Proposition 42. Mayor Pro Tem Scalise 1 . Atascadero State Hospital Advisory Board: The Board was apprised of new and ongoing security issues. A fencing program will be replacing current razor wire with a newer wire with electronic eyes that will trigger a response with less weight. Assistant City Manager Brady Cherry reported on the recent meeting of ECHO stating that a Board of Directors has been elected and a budget passed in the amount of $63,000. • Council Member Johnson Stated that he is now on the County Water Committee and has not seen anything come through from that Committee. He requested that this be looked into so that he can have the necessary information. Council Member Clay 1 . Air Pollution Control District (APCD): Larry Allen has been appointed as Director. D. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION: City Council: Council Member Johnson reported on a recent problem in the County regarding the signing of a standard proclamation. He cautioned that staff look closely at proclamations for any language with funding implications. City Treasurer: Informed Council that there is more consolidation going on in the financial services sector. • CC 02/12/02 Page 9 010 E. ADJOURNMENT: Mayor Arrambide adjourned the meeting at 8:55 .m. to the next regularly • Y 1 9 p scheduled meeting on February 26, 2002. MEETING RECORDED AND MINUTES PREPARED BY: Grace Pucci, Deputy City Clerk Attachment A - Russell Pierce, 7560 Castana, Petition • • CC 02/12/02 r'� Page 10 V i l iti111 w�' 1w� �ti141 �1?3Z1$l�f (�Jti?Td ' w� ( l$l Attachment: A Atascadero City Council Mtg. {f --------------------------------------------- 2 ------------ Oppose Needless New Laws and Restrictions - Protect Our Rights Against Special Interest Minority ------------------------------------------------------------ We the undersigned, citizens of Atascadero, are strongly opposed to the V Atascadero City Council's proposed city ordinance banning bow hunting and the use of any device which propels a projectile more then fifty feet within the city limits of Atascadero. Furthermore, we urge the 1� Atascadero City Council not to pass the proposed city ordinance, as it has q not, in any way, been established as the will of the majority of the citizens of Atascadero. This is to be submitted to the Atascadero City Council at their meeting scheduled for February 12, 2002. Name: & Name: f1 Address: E1 Address: �"3`Ji�"�4 f�c� ,u��d• Name: ,sry F«f��ar�f Name: � _ �ts Address: 11-70,7 Address: Z7.-75- GDRxSz firms 17 Name: nc x, ��t� (L, Name: 1ULAL t4i Cly ,1q,C0"J • �f Address: I 4 � � Address: Name: rIt 1-21 L Name: �z. P Address: 6%Ota cs L Address: �f�C� Name: � /U2�`� �11-/'�S Name: &Address: � �5 j il/Ti¢ XMIW Address: jlaS 1= L a ern; Name: app Name: Cryo, l o •` V Address: �— �• ro•a �vE & Address: ZUG he!z a ru,j Name: PO ��'� �� V Name: tkA! UJaA.rz Address: Address: ZL`l� Cry �u,Ki.,o ICrc L Name: Name: Address: Address: � Name: Name: {� Address: Dz7 Address: Name: %C�/� �L��itiS6L Name: Address: 27��,k�,u�!c-o UQ- 5,- �� � � Address: � pe a ya f ' +'• • . .-.-.-_-_-___-__------------------------------ Oppose ---J-w-_-------_-_---_-_--Oppose Needless New Laws and Restrictions - Protect Our Rights Against Special Inter est Minority � v We the undersigned, citizens of Atascadero are 9 , strongly opposed to the � Atascadero City Council's proposed city ordinance banning bow hunting and the use of any device which propels a projectile more then fifty feet within the city limits of Atascadero. Furthermore, we urge the Atascadero City Council not to pass the proposed city ordinance, as it has V not, in any way, been established as the will of the majority of the citizens of Atascadero. This is to be submitted to the Atascadero City Council at their meeting scheduled for February 12, 2002. PAINTBALL PALACE �Name: (805)460-9145 �1 o Keal Name: V V Address: Atasradf-r n CA 93422Address: 05 E-1 �� < Name:' Cyl G C 6�2 Name: Usa se")V'w / �Address: 00Z 6 S� ��—C 6S" �1 Address: �Name: dmn hhM I,, /} ' Name: Address: V I� if1 ��"/ �T Address: )M,'10" LlGa VName: I Name: V Address: C�Aao 17,E h Address: V ` Name: _ d Name: ; n � V Address: �0-9.��1,,���4� Address: /ZS Name: �1`Kt�O1 Name: �fa Address: Address Name: k V Name: V Address: 7 VAddress: V Name: Name: l m Y� r r. 1 VAddress: Address: '1 D0 l.t�- �,(,{ L � � nn _ a—� � Name: Name: I l Iyn I't Address: II Q IS k i n Ln Address: •Name: Name: Address: Address: 0-13 q ?f11,V V12VVVV 1� �1?I uT,f 1f&V11VIr �'1f1l -71�V {P,lf�1,� Name: IV u k \e.hhI� ef� Name: G60-jtti rY)1al-"c `�U Address: Address: �7 LA- Name: y — • �Name: Name: � �1 Address: Address: Name: Name: &Address: Address: Name: Name: 1 Address: Address: Name: Name: Address: Address: � Name: Name: � Address: Address: � Name: Name: � Address: Address: Name: Name: • �Address: Address: � Name: Name: Address: Address: Name: Name: V Address: Address: �t Name: Name: v �Address: Address: � � � I � I Name: Name: Address: Address: li Name: Name: Address: Address: �1 �Name: Name: � Address: Address: �1 Name: Name: Address: Address: 014 ------------------------------------------------ ---------- Oppose Needless New Laws and Restrictions - Protect Our Rights Against • Special Interest Minority ------------------------------------------------------------- We the undersigned, citizens of Atascadero, are strongly opposed to the Atascadero City Council's proposed city ordinance banning bow hunting and the use of any device which propels a projectile more then fifty feet within the city limits of Atascadero. Furthermore, we urge the Atascadero City Council not to pass the proposed city ordinance, as it has not, in any way, been established as the will of the majority of the citizens of Atascadero. This is to be submitted to the Atascadero City Council at their meeting scheduled for February 12, 2002. Name: inti hOi, 6"S � I Name: � Address: 176/6 F� Ccvnwio �,.; Address: �j Name: og e,✓ �l v L/��'� /ii Name: ?t Address: Address: �r Name: � Name: � Address: Address: • U Name: Name: Address: Address: Name: Name: d Address: Address: Name: Name: Address: Address: Name: Name: � Address: Address: �1 �t Name: Name: Address: Address: Name: Name: Address: Address: f/ �1 • Name: Name: Address: Address: 01 5 tj �t Oppose Needless New Laws and Restrictions - Protect Our Rights Against ------------- ------------------------ Special Interest Minority v We the undersigned, citizens of Atascadero, are strongly opposed to the V Atascadero City Council's proposed city ordinance banning bow hunting and the use of any device which propels a projectile more then fifty feet within the city limits of Atascadero. Furthermore, we urge the VAtascadero City Council not to pass the proposed city ordinance, as it has V v not, in any way, been established as the will of the majority of the citizens of Atascadero. This is to be submitted to the Atascadero City Council at their meeting scheduled for February 12, 2002. � sr VName: Ye1� p P_✓SCr) V Name: V Address: j2d . Address: CA- Name: L(,tAY1 Y�2 �e� P�YSti?n � Name: � Address: ZSc�e:cx(e r. V�CQ Address: � t � V Name: `��.P.��2_ �_a 1�� �� Name: • V Address: � � — Address:JA01 � Name: 7��fi- Name:0 Address: Address: Ch r( V Name: s �/c-j .� © r „ Name: Address: Address: Name: �l Name: Address: Address: Name: Name: V Address: Address: Name: Name: Address: 1 Address: V Name: Name: Address: f Address: Name: Name: Address: � Address: �} C E 6 �1 �Pd- ,VVVV /VV t,VVVV wV�V;Z1�1V VV 111 V V17 VVti1$1VVVVVtl ,V '._. V ------------------------------------------------------------• V O pose Needless New Laws pp and V Restrictions - Protect Our Rights Against V - - - - - -Special Interest Minority- - - - - � • -- -- We the undersigned, citizens of Atascadero, are strongly opposed to the Atascadero City Council's proposed city ordinance banning bow hunting & and the use of any device which propels a projectile more then fifty feet within the city limits of Atascadero Furthermore, we urge the V Atascadero City Council not to pass the proposed city ordinance, as it has 1� not, in any way, been established as the will of the majority of the citizens of Atascadero. This is to be submitted to the Atascadero City & Council at their meeting scheduled for February 12, 2002. & V Name: / Name: � Address: i�o�� Tte��i� hi1�PJ Address: V & V - Name: Name: Address: 13s3 . L., ALTas Rc� 80 Address: & V i1 Name: V Name: V Address: / O Address: • V 5'G!- 5l32_ V V Name: Name: n w V Address: Co !U �''l'( QLt L.Z �G12 . ar Address: & Name: ( Name: V ?t Address: V Address: � & � � Name: Name: V y �1 1�Address: V Address: 1� / V Name: f ?I Name: & �Address: I , 9 z << Address: Name: Name: Address: Address: Name: Name: �1 &Address: Address: tl � Name: Name: Address: Address: 017 V Oppose Needless New Laws and Restrictions - Protect Our Rights Against • ------------------------------------------------------------ v - - - - - -Special Interest Minority- --- ' v We the undersigned, citizens of Atascadero, are strongly opposed to the Atascadero City Council's proposed city ordinance banning bow hunting and the use of any device which propels a projectile more then fifty feet V within the city limits of Atascadero. Furthermore, we urge the vAtascadero City Council not to pass the proposed city ordinance, as it has 1 not, in any way, been established as the will of the majority of the citizens of Atascadero. This is to be submitted to the Atascadero City Council at their meeting scheduled for February 12, 2002. Name: Name: V Address: Address: V �T � V Name: CLL V Name: Address: 9 @2 ?1 Address: V � r � V V Name: �� �i LVU er�.�:�� Name: V Address: 9�0 .e J6--Z .crCJ n Address: V V Name: V Name: �Address: V - Address: �f Name: Name: V ?t Address: 1 1, � .('-- V Address: V V �!/ V Name: _ Name: � &Address: S �I 3o Address: V Name: V Name: V VAddress: Address: V V V V Name: V Name: V Address: Address: ?I V VName: Name: Address: Address: • �l VName: Name: V V Address: Address: V 018 V 'W 'J i" J 'W 'W 'W `LI W �J W �u ami awl W iJ �lJ 4� L��W '�`4�u`4�vj�:��'.�bl 'vl 4�^rl 4�•W . �R----------------------------------------------------------- 11 Oppose Needless New Laws and Restrictions - Protect Our Rights Against - - - - - -Special Interest Minority - - - - - - --------------------------------- ----------- • -- We the undersigned, citizens of Atascadero, are strongly opposed to the Atascadero City Council's proposed city ordinance banning bow hunting and the use of any device which propels a projectile more then fifty feet within the city limits of Atascadero. Furthermore, we urge the Atascadero City Council not to pass the proposed city ordinance, as it has 1� not, in any way, been established as the will of the majority of the citizens of Atascadero. This is to be submitted to the Atascadero City Council at their meeting scheduled for February 12, 2002. �r 1�Name: `Z Name: �Address: t Address: YName: Name: i .. �P Address: -- Address: G�' CH2a, L> let) Name:, , � �, Name: Address: 5fS'f' i Q' /)�' Address: %S SS %� (l/ L,-'k • � w tt Name: Name: !" j {t Address: S'Zc Address: / /a�2 �' & F� 47 a? / ) i�rGl d �t Name: Dame: Address: g��>r 1 �c:+�1`C�(<c- Address: & & Name: Name: o J e, J Address: CO YO= rAddress: 93t+-;L LA, � �•Le,•i Ci• & &Name: Name: J� n 2 83 Address: 93 2 �.T r�CJ' Address: Name: Led•z_ i �t Name: C14 & Address: Address: 93C.� Ja,N '�-,;.ft'c,,; ' a e t, In Name: / G` �^ � Name: &Address: Address: 9-J(.0 SAar--' ,c:Sen �. Name: Name - t Address: Address y �f �1 t sf�J 1 1 f�tiP t�1�1?11 It,1 It, 'Y 1 &1� ? t f ? t t�t t sf t l t 1 P t t l st T f t l 'l�/l Name: sTw� C-o Fel/(Js Name: ��- 110 V4\- ?EA--41 � Address: YZYU �sY( t�/� Ave- Address: Z--% mow,+'rzc)y v Name: n T 1 G( 1� l�l(/�� Name: Lo c,42 r->•A- tV H4H • �Address: -,S�T INA a-,y1 U << G1 1,j'(,' Address: Sq 2�.-, �J �f Name: "1Y`1 1`mac:, ' ' Name: OF Address: C i:41 C Address: 1.3 5u 5 514 n fti L uvk V Name: f aloe, f�� Name. � I Address: ' -� �� t.G�� w r/, Address: ��'I i v�t k-IC"2 (�r/ V Name: z-;,, Name: Address: 5� c-(�j rir, � Address: pV Name: (3 ;1 C� � �IJC��4 Name: Address: qK-4n CU,o(Y\L\c Address: Name: Q Name: til VAddress: s"i_?o A uj -)o Address: Name: Name: V • FuT V Address: �JCS� )9-81GfZF( t,6, Address: �1 Name: P.4Lf4,4 P, WWR66' Name: �//�� �Address: 1551��iE�2G?S 1-/J. Address: � � � I �1 , Name: faai'kt R-S4�,�S Name: Address: �1,3�17 �f� l Address: SP � Name: (4w3 *e Name: Address: p}yo 06�CAN7-++40- 2Q. Address: �l Name: Name: Address: X375/0 ocl s-7-4 izen4 2'-' . Address: � Name: ®�'� Name: Address: 0 z, ev14 Address: V Name: _ Name: � �[ Address: ez Address: Z.J �,S ClC(2 ' i ce � VName: �� Name: Address: S mss= Address: 020 �1 �1 V ----------------------------------------------------------- _ _ _ _ _ _ Oppose Needless New Laws and V Restrictions - Protect Our Rights Against Special Interest Minority V .____-_____-_____________-___-_-_-_-_____________________-_-. i We the undersigned, citizens of Atascadero, are strongly opposed to the Atascadero City Council's proposed city ordinance banning bow hunting and the use of any device which propels a projectile more then fifty feet within the city limits of Atascadero. Furthermore we urge the V V Atascadero City Council not to pass the proposed city ordinance, as it has Vnot, in any way, been established as the will of the majority of the citizens of Atascadero. This is to be submitted to the Atascadero City Council at their meeting scheduled for February 12, 2002. V V Name: Oe f _ Name: V Address: Address: VName: C—� s Name: Address: i d Address: QB( si4 ra V Name: �.�} V Name: Address: �c�c' Address: �o • � n � �r Name: V V Name: AftgC Scr+-,ii 6666 r � Address: tiC26y[r.5Address: 705'-0 LoS f�i2/�o[L-I , /L= V �l Zc�e l �;�ti�r✓'F'iJ V t Name: 17 Name: 7 �1�nl ��.(+J5 T V Address: C- 1 (41 l Wc, V Address: f1 // � Name: �[t� (�L'"5 Name: a2e0 Rmeat-2 L Address: 1�L L E, I ' t1 , Address: _C2:�-20 S,t,J MA-t co- V V Name: ' � Name: 41 .1(aAU*"� Address: O ���" '' Address: 4525 _\lICJYI�Cj Ave. V 7+ Name: �, e V I Yc�iruZ��— � Name: V Address: ` --Address: �1�5 �YG�` 8. CQ- �T � Name: L�n 3 / 't Il i p Name: r V Address: ri n+ k �'�� t ' V Address: V V V .,?7 I V V Name: >> Name: i((;a,+,. 4a rG n Address: %� 7Yy� vl � Address: �_(�l� S4n,���9b���V 021 V V tit�1$T�P$?sf$IVVV&V VVVVVVVVv' ?d tilVVVVVV JVVVItVVV Name: Pk A-Ar me , Name: Address: 9/O'� Address: • {�Name: Name: Address: '�3 U S �c rlllr sl p . Address: y/CYC A2�zc�ya Name: AJ E: V )46wLJI < Name: ?I Address: 3 3os- P/) Address: V Name: Name: ly v n & Address: -330 c 1,47.4 Address: � nn// V Name: &AY-4L SS 17-tu/&VEK7— Name: t Address: 71J5� GUS /�oLC--J Address: Name: Name: �P V Address: —e, s Xy Address: 'V Name: �^� �b f� Name: t Address: �� 8C.l iz— Address: � �t �t Name: Q PN,\&- W-Q bz:z) Name: . Address: IaS G,rna000A Address: �t Name: CHI c G A t j Name: � Address: 464,0 6 GA6-0 AJC Address: Name: Name: Address: Address: Name: u Name: Address: Address: Name: Name: Address: ,LQSO� �` cfis Address: f1 � Name: ��_��y� �i.i�r�t�� Name: Address: /6Ku:-o Address: Name: 225 Name: Address: ?,57&cD CAs />wO Address: � i f P� C�2C e Name: �Name: � Address: 7=5�-)o (�S/;41VQ Address: 0 2 2 �1 17 � ITEM NUMBER:—A-2 n DATE: 02/26/2002 a 1918 n. , 199 • �A,SrAD�/ Atascadero City Council Staff Report — Public Works Department 22 Passenger Accessible Bus Authorization to Purchase through State Department of General Services RECOMMENDATION: Council approve: 1. The draft Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute contracts with the State of California for Transit grant monies and amending the Transit budget to reflect the purchase of an additional Transit vehicle; and, 2. The draft Resolution authorizing the Department of General Services of the State of • California to purchase vehicles on behalf of the City of Atascadero. DISCUSSION: Background: UMTA Section 5311 Funds were applied for and approved in the 1998-99 Fiscal Year, and the purchase of a bus using these funds was approved in that same year's budget. The grant agreement was delayed and the bus was never purchased. Because we must either spend or lose these grant funds, we are recommending that Council authorize the purchase of this additional bus. This purchase would be in addition to the bus ordered in July 2001 and would be funded as follows: 80%UMTA Section 5311 grant, 20% available Transit funds. As in previous years, staff recommends that the bus be purchased through the State of California Department of General Services(DGS). Each year DGS solicits bids for a wide variety of equipment, materials and services. Other governmental agencies are provided with the results of these bids and allowed to purchase these goods through the state for a service fee of 1% of the purchase price, to a maximum of$5,000. Considerable staff time is saved by eliminating the need to prepare specifications, advertise bids and evaluate results. Based upon previous purchases, the cost offered by the state is very competitive. • 023 ITEM NUMBER: A-2 DATE: 02/26/2002 FISCAL IMPACT: The draft Resolution provides for a budget amendment to appropriate $60,000 for this purchase • and amend the Revenue Projection by $48,000 to reflect the 80% matching grant. The remaining 20%, will be funded with Transportation Development Act funds. After delivery, the vehicle will receive a new radio, farebox and custom painting. The total cost of the vehicle will remain within the $60,000 budget. ALTERNATIVES: Alternative#1 Council may choose not to adopt this resolution and direct staff to prepare documents and advertise for bids. Advantages: Potential for receiving lower bid. Disadvantages: Due to the excellent pricing available from the State of California, the potential for receiving a lower bid is remote. In addition, considerable staff time is saved using the state bid process. Alternative #2 Council may choose not to adopt this resolution and not approve the purchase of a transit vehicle at this time. Advantages: Cost savings of approximately$10,000 of Transit Development Funds. • Disadvantages: Any cost savings experienced would not be available to the transit system for other uses. Aging vehicles must be replaced on a regular basis to provide safe, reliable transit service. ATTACHMENTS: Draft Resolution Authorizing Purchase from State Department of General Services Draft Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to execute 5311 Contracts 024 DRAFT RESOLUTION • RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE CONTRACTS WITH THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR TRANSIT GRANT MONIES AND AMENDING THE TRANSIT BUDGET TO REFLECT THE PURCHASE OF AN ADDITIONAL TRANSIT VEHICLE The City Council of the City of Atascadero does hereby authorize the City Manager to execute on behalf of the City of Atascadero all documents required for execution of Section 5311 Grants, and The City Council of Atascadero does hereby amend the 2001-02 Budget to reflect an additional appropriation in the amount of $60,000 and an amended revenue projection increase of$48,000 in the Transit Fund. On motion by Councilmember , and seconded by , the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote: • AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ADOPTED: ATTEST: CITY OF ATASCADERO Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk J. Michael Arrambide, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney • 025 DRAFT RESOLUTION • RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO AUTHORIZING THE DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA TO PURCHASE VEHICLES ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO Be it resolved that the City Council of the City of Atascadero does hereby authorize the Procurement Division, Department of General Services of the State of California, to purchase vehicles for and on behalf of the City of Atascadero pursuant to Section 10324 of the California Public Contract Code, and that the City Manager, is hereby directed to sign and deliver all necessary requests and other documents in connection therewith for and on behalf of the City of Atascadero. On motion by Councilmember , and seconded by Councilmember the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: • ADOPTED: ATTEST: CITY OF ATASCADERO BY Marcia McClure Torgerson J. Michael Arrambide City Clerk Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Roy A. Hanley City Attorney • 026 ITEM NUMBER: A-3 ■' ■'®� �'■' I� DATE: 02/26/2002 1918 " 1979 A��ERoi� Atascadero City Council Staff Report - Public Works Department Azucena Avenue Drainage Improvements Project RECOMMENDATIONS: Council: 1. Appropriate $30,000 from Amapoa Tecorida Fees fund to the Azucena Avenue Drainage Improvements Project account. 2. Authorize City Manager to sign a Change Order for approximately $18,000 to Arthurs Contracting, Inc. 3. Authorize City Manager to approve future Change Orders. DISCUSSION: In November 1997, the City of Atascadero entered a settlement agreement with the property owners in the Azucena drainage area. Part of the'settlement agreement was the construction of a storm drainage system. The Azucena Avenue Drainage Improvements project has been designed to mitigate the drainage issues in this area. On September 9, 2001 Council authorized the City Manager to execute an agreement with Arthurs Contracting, Inc in the amount of$124,032.10. Several issues arose during construction causing project overruns: • A gas main was not shown on the design plans. It ran in the same location as the proposed storm drainage line. The storm drain had to be redesigned in a different location. • The sewer line was shown incorrectly on the plans. This required another redesign of the system and lowering of effected sewer laterals. • The waterline depth was shown incorrectly on the plans requiring relocation of a catch basin. • • The trench had to be overexcavated because compaction requirements could not be reached due to recent rains. • Design grades for the drainage ditch were incorrect on the plans requiring additional excavation and installation of a culvert to provide access to a parcel. 027 ITEM NUMBER: A-3 DATE: 02/26/2002 The City Manager has approved Contract Change Orders for this project up to the allowed 20 percent limit. The Contractor is waiting for warm dry weather to complete the trench repair and • final thero'ect. p J An additional $30,000 allocated to the project from the Amapoa Tecorida Fees Fund will cover current requested Change Orders, and provide additional contingencies. City Staff will work with the City Attorney to pursue any legal avenues available to collect additional funding. FISCAL IMPACT: EXPENDITURES Original Budgeted Amount $170,710.00 II' Design Engineering -$11,071.80 Current Inspection Costs -$2,768.86 Title work and advertisement -$2,350.30 Amount Available for Construction $154,519.04 Original Contract Amount $124,032.05 Increased Quantities to Date +$4,932.15 • Approved Contract Change Orders to Date +$22,715.69 Total Contract Amount $151,679.89 Less Payments to Date -$131,464.80 Remainder of Contract to be Encumbered $20,215.09 Contract Change Order +$18,000.00 Additional Contingencies +$12,000.00 Total Adjusted Amount Available for Construction and Inspection $184,519.04 ALTERNATIVES: 1. Authorize Change Order 2. Do not Authorize Change Order—Project will not be completed. ATTACHMENTS: Change Order • 028 CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER Sheet 1 of 1 sheets Change Order No. 6 Project: Azucena Drainage Improvements Date: February 26, 2002 Project No. 2001-003 To: Arthurs Contracting, Inc., Contractor You are here hereby authorized and directed to make the herein described changes from the plans and specifications, and/or to increase or decrease contract quantities, as follows: As requested by City Of Atascadero Adjust sewer laterals as necessary for new drainage line alignment. Excavate gas main and coordinate relocation. Remove saturated subgrade and replace with compacted Class 2 Base and fabric in accordance with geotechnical report. Core drill outlet structure to allow drainage of private property. All work shall be done at Force Account in accordance with Section 5-6.05 of the Special Provisions. We, the undersigned contractor, have given careful consideration to the changes proposed Not To Exceed: $18,000 and hereby agree, if this proposal is approved, that we will provide all equipment, furnish all materials, except as may be noted above and Sub itted by: perform all services necessary for the work above specified, and will accept as full payment therefor the prices shown above. T� Pub id-Works Director By reason of this proposed change 5 day(s) extension of time will be allowed. Accepted date 20 City Manager Signed: Contractor's Authorized Agent Date approved • —For Official City Use Only— Change in Contract Price Change in Contract Time Original Contract Price$ Original Contract Time days Total CCO Price(All CCO's)$ Change in Contract Time from previous CCO's days Contract Price Prior to this CCO$ Contract Time Prior to this CCO days Net Increase(Decrease)this CCO$ Net Increase(Decrease)this CCO days h Contract Price with all Approved CCO's$ Contract Time with all Approved CCO's days. �J ITEM NUMBER: A-4 - DATE: 02/26/2002 1918 % 1979 Atascadero City Council Staff Report—Public Works Department Acceptance of Final Tract Map 2001-0015 (Tract 2271) 3900 Traffic Way (The Lakes) (The Lakes/Wilson) RECOMMENDATION: Council: 1. Accept Phase 3 and 4 Final Tract Map 2001-0015 (Tract 2271); and, 2. Reject the offers of dedication for public utility easements shown on Final Parcel Map 2001-0015. 3. Accept the offer of dedication for Traffic Way right-of-way from Harold and Gloria Myers dated January 27, 1999. • DISCUSSION: Tentative Tract Map 97003 was approved by the City Council on February 9, 1999 in conjunction with General Plan Amendment 97001 and Zone Change 97002 which is known as The Lakes project. The tentative map approval allowed the subdivision of 142± acres into 123 single-family lots, and 8 open space lots. The tentative map approval allows for the recording of phased final maps. This acceptance is the final two phases (Phase 3 and Phase 4) Final Maps consisting of 91±acres and 56 single-family lots and 2 open space lots. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 66440 the approving legislative body (City Council) cannot deny a final map that is consistent with an approved tentative map. The legislative body is also required to accept, accept subject to improvement or reject, on behalf of the public, any real property offered for dedication for public use in conformity with the terms of the offer of dedication. A dedication for emergency access, public access, and public utility easements are being offered on Final Map 2001-0017 to fulfill a Condition of Approval issued by Planning and the City Engineer. The City Engineer recommends the City Council reject this dedication. Harold and Gloria Myers have made an offer of dedication for Traffic Way right-of-way as part • of this project. The Lakes project is widening the intersection of Chico Road and Traffic Way to allow for turn pockets off of Traffic Way onto Chico Road. This dedication will place the improvements in the right-of-way. The City Engineer is recommending the City Council accept the dedication. - 030 ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 02/26/2002 Staff has determined that the Final Parcel Map is consistent with approved Tentative Parcel Map. • p FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A: Final Tract Map 2001-0015 (Tract 227 1) Exhibit B: Offer of Dedication for Traffic Way right-of-way • • 031 ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 02/26/2002 • Exhibit A Final Tract Map 2001-0015 (Tract 2271) The Lakes Phase 3 and 4 s a as A 31 zHi ON I - sst-=°' I<y ?3JJ 8 4 S a < e � Jy • LQ • � w�i'-i gew�i a seer p/ gk^� W:�p�'�E1 SE� aqy S Y� g _ x -• 9 ••a.8 .`S y i.a: �=C"a.Cf CL n�! ��� •� �` p �� Q) r 3 K�i" ya e; aafl k; Ib t� gyp v>3 g � S •° � � k;r � � aa4 e� esb v � F 4 : AaAP c L - w 9 s qty 9 b bPi � 5a 9b t>. • aa�5a� i s — — — 'R 49e6161 Ge'sA ~ �� E j� �Y aia ••• °a0 I ( I j syr Vl132ll53 HIA_ 032 ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 02/26/2002 Exhibit A • Final Tract Map 2001-0015(Tract 2271) The Lakes Phase 3 and 4 CL II h Q� o s g p o 11 NAGS II �g s d = i ^�a" ...� Q.�� as I y�- \\�\ \1 � • all 56 a g II�,� _=—L_ ==c "h b ` e a s 111 n\1 s' Ol3/121Yy \% 00 U ~� i1g7 om q nA � MONO w ¢ a a b \ V x x z U J i •.t• 0d0 I jL 8C L LG �i 033 ITEM NUMBER: A—4 DATE: 02/26/2002 • Exhibit A Final Tract Map 2001-0015 (Tract 2271) The Lakes Phase 3 and 4 c� n HIS 3 // !/ / o� Il 11 III I g > I ar.uc tM.) II I II g If II it it li Y I! Ni(T 1 n� e • �''\\` � �� dg gill 11 II II ji it tl I II II 11 II II II II Sulu la`s 1 ii PCZII II II 1 i 8a ;I _d Y 1) II II II r e l \ 111 11 II II ry 11 p I II � i, ° ifII oil ) ae 1 V 11 !R pa III qqpp ; p n3 f 11 i �lll/•� €_ a 1 11 F. ; a I it <4 U } `l l 111 � •-+� •�• oao I I� /// � a a I GLL acE 68 ' • 034 ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 02/26/2002 Exhibit A • Final Tract Map 2001-0015 (Tract 2271) The Lakes Phase 3 and 4 s $II yl II ro 4: II !I III It II q II it B t it it @S ' N' �� 8 � Ir II z 3a ii II � •3 � >�" i/ rU// �Fs II S a r IV 1. ..• � : �� � �� gsp"9` it �4 ��\��� • 81 v �y 5 p 9 3 W 3 9!9 it -! -:: .40 oao I I I i 3 IV s —I a I bccti . 155 ig _ I I N I Ila � ss33 t I I� IIS'"' �� 819 989 99B 98 9 899 8 9�9 II{ a 1 1 I it 3 1 III - `-� � oaaa^ a'cE GGGGG•L5 •5 n 55 55 55 035 l ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 02/26/2002 • Exhibit A Final Tract Map 2001-0015(Tract 2271) The Lakes Phase 3 and 4 a r R �•°.,�� milli p 9 gir g � � i=A 8s a Vk } i �a 11 lr HN 111 RIP _lil }j t�11 1t==r-- oMSFI 111 J to Il -N—f I/ / e33 II Il 11 W2NEUII Ih Il 11 11 �� w kll 5 0" 11 Il ti nV ��II I'..oilk µ 111 g =g A� w 11 I� IA E�%oll a�¢ Ail. •40 0a0 I I I D ,► . � , All 036 RECORDING REQUESTED BY, AND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: DOC No: 2000-006992 Rpt NO: 0000940 CITY CLERK Official Records ; NF —1 0 .00 CITY OF ATASCADERO San Luis Obispo co. ; 6500 PALMA AVENUE Julie L. Rodewa l d Recorder ATAS CADERO, CALIFORNIA 93422 Feb 09 , 2&0 0 ; Time: 16 :03 r1 ; ` 6] ; TOTAL 0. 00 IRREVOCABLE&PERPETUAL OFFER TO DEDICATE THIS OFFER TO DEDICATE, made the day of Tan%)Mr-,.1 199q_, by Harold and Gloria Myers of the City of Atascadero County of , ty San Luis Obispo, Stateof California, hereinafter termed Offeror: WHEREAS, said Offer desires to make an offer to dedicate irrevocably I� n � y t o the public, an easement t for public road purposes which may be accepted at any time by any governmental entity which has the power to establish, construct and maintain roads. • �I NOW, THEREFORE, said Offeror covenants and promises as follows: 1. That said Offeror is the owner of the following interest described below: SEE EXHIBIT"A" 2. That said Offeror does hereby irrevocably and in perpetuity offer to such governmental entity a dedication of a public right-of-way for road purposes and incidental uses upon the following described property: SEE EXHIBIT`B" 3. That until such time as the above offer to dedicate is accepted by such a governmental entity, all owners of property contiguous to the above described road parcel shall have the right to the use of said road parcel as a private road. 4. That said Offeror agrees that said offer of dedication shall be irrevocable and that such government entity may, at any time in the future, accept said offer of dedication of the public right-of- way. • 037 5. That said Offeror agrees that this Irrevocable and Perpetual Offer to Dedicate is and shall be binding on his/her heirs,legatees and assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF. this Offer to Dedicate is hereby executed by said Offeror on the day and year first above written. Harold Mye s , J Gloria T. Myers AGKNOWLEDGNMNT • 038 State of California ) County of 5�-AQ U1 S Q' iJ' � On JGc� 5CI 1 T9 5 before me, so<,An 71-n VI� , Notary Public, personally appeared CZ t o t2..i A 7. ray e f s and I�,Dt& v , personally known to me to be the person(s)whose name(s)-Ware subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in it/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his�her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s) or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. SUSAN H.JONES i Commission 1 i 71187 = z s Notary Public-California i San Luis Obispo County % C' -I('UL4G My Comm.Expires Feb 22,2002 U • • 039 �i armon , ASSOCIATES EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description A portion of Lot 1-C, Block 21, Atascadero Colony in the City of Atascadero, County of San Luis Obispo, State of California according to the map thereof filed for record in Book 3 of Maps of Atascadero Colony at Page 24 in the office of the Clerk-Recorder of said County, said portion being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point on the Easterly boundary of said Lot 1-C, said True Point of Beginning being also the true point of beginning of that certain 60 foot wide strip of land as described in the IRREVOCABLE &PERPETUAL OFFER TO DEDICATE recorded in Volume 1642, Page 370 of the Official Records of said County, thence leaving said Easterly boundary, North 57144'00" West, 151.87 feet along the Northwesterly prolongation of the Southerly line of said OFFER TO DEDICATE to the beginning of a tangent curve concave Southerly and having a radius of 732.38 feet; thence along said curve to the left through a central angle of 18009'47" for an arc length of 232.17 feet to the Easterly line of Santa Cruz Road(40.00 feet wide); thence along said Easterly line, South 35113'00" West, 222.17 feet to intersect the Southerly line of Lot 1-C; thence along said Southerly line, • South 65030'00"East 447.50 feet to the Southeast corner of Lot 1-C, thence along the Easterly line of Lot 1-C, North 17036'00" East, 204.95 feet to the True Point of Beginning and containing 2.10 acres, more or less. End Description Prepared by: fZuC� Cpm Richard H: Cassera, LS 4283 (license renewal 6/30/00) Alv t; H. C ` r Date: . 7 �a 4283 • P �gTF OF CA�1Fo��� F:\PROD\1997\970704\970704.05\LEGALDOC 040 Mannon A 5 S O C I AT E S EXHIBIT "B" ( 1 of 2 ) • Legal Description A portion of Lot I-C, Block 21, Atascadero Colony in the City of Atascadero, County of San Luis Obispo, State of California according to the map thereof filed for record in Book 3 of Maps of Atascadero Colony at Page 24 in the office of the Clerk-Recorder of said County, said portion being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point on the Easterly boundary of said Lot 1-C, said True Point of Beginning being also the true point of beginning of that certain 60 foot wide strip of land as described in the IRREVOCABLE &PERPETUAL OFFER TO DEDICATE recorded in Volume 1642, Page 370 of the Official Records of said County, thence leaving said Easterly boundary, North 57144'00" West, 151.87 feet along the Northwesterly prolongation of the Southerly line of said OFFER TO DEDICATE to the beginning of a tangent curve concave Southerly and having a radius of 732.38 feet; thence along said-curve to the left through a central angle of 18009'47" for an arc length of 232.17 feet to the Easterly line of Santa Cruz Road (40.00 feet wide); thence along said Easterly line, North 35°13'00" East, 79.69 feet to intersect the Northerly boundary of the property as described in Volume 3862, Page 238 of the Official Records of said County; thence along said Northerly line parallel to the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way on a curve taper 1/2, • South 57145'28" East, 125.05 feet to the beginning of a curve concave northerly having a radius of 1959.91 feet; thence from a tangent bearing of South 59018'12" East along said curve and parallel line to the left through a central angle of 6152'53" for an arc length of 235.39 feet to the Easterly line of Lot 1-C; thence along said Easterly line, South 17°36'00" West, 65.84 feet to the True Point of Beginning and containing 0.47 acre, more or less. End Description r f` _ANj C j.f v �P Prepared by: 941 C� <1 Richard H. Cassera, LS 4283 42 (license renewal 6/30/00) Date: - /,Z5 /98 qTE OF • F.\PROJ119971970704\970704.05\1-EGAL..DOC "'4 EXHIBIT B (2 of 2 ) I I L0 T 2 Li_ , • p• R• 1P R----L- R. _ 25' _ V57'4528"W S R=1959.91 145.08' D=06°52'53" i = 125.05' L=235.39 o� OFFE�Z FO-DEDICATE <0�47 ACRE\\" \� 87X/STiN _ �EXISTfNG`i` TRAFFIC�.'WAY ��`� �pAt/�- t\ �� _� (1642-OpG OFFER OF- DEDICATION rRAFF/C �:���� .-. _ .�� .QED ROAD` ` � -370) A Y o R=732.38 �``; 60.00 FEET WIDE ^� o (40' D=18°09'47" N57 44 00„wzo co L=232.17 151.87' a REMAINDER C N I: o 0 o N - 2.10 ACRES � N Ivo o 447.50' v _S65°3000"E 4^6 7.86' r -------------- I I I I I OFFER OF DEDICATION armon MASSOCIATES (DEDICATED PER 703—OR-400 BY NAME ONLY) ENGINEER S TRAFFIC WAY THROUGH LOT 1 -C P L A N N E R S OF BLOCK 21, ATASCADERO COLONY S U R V E Y O R S CITY OF ATASCADERO, COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO 364 Pocific Street STATE OF CALIFORNIA Son Luis Obispo, CA 93401 SCALE 1 INCH = loG FEET 4 (805) 544-7407 END OF DOCUMENT ITEM NUMBER: B-1 ifai� a DATE: 02/26/2002 iais'1■ s is e Atascadero City Council Staff Report - Community Development Department Zone Change 2001-0019 / Conditional Use Permit 2001-0050 Tentative Tract Map 2001-0008 (Tract 2444), Road Abandonment 2001-0007 9385 Musselman Avenue (Jim Shores / R. Thompson Consulting) RECOMMENDATIONS: The Planning Commission recommends the City Council: 1. Adopt the draft Resolution certifying the proposed Negative Declaration 2001-0053; and, • 2. Introduce the draft Ordinance for first reading by title only, to approve Zone Chane 2001- P g 0019; and 3. Adopt the draft Resolution approving Conditional Use Permit 2001-0050 for the Master Plan of Development subject to findings and conditions of approval; and, 4. Adopt the draft Resolution approving Road Abandonment 2001-0007, a request to abandon a portion of the Musselman Avenue colony right-of-way, based on the appropriate findings and subject to the conditions of approval; and, 5. Adopt the draft Resolution approving Tentative Tract Map 2001-0008, subject to findings and conditions of approval. REPORT IN BRIEF: Proposed rezone to Planned Development Overlay Zone PD-7, a 10-lot Tentative Tract Map to permit the construction of nine new two-bedroom single family homes, and a request to abandon a portion of Musselman Avenue road right-of-way. The project is located on an existing lot currently developed with a single-family residence. The lot has slopes below 10% with several mature native oak trees located within the project site, several small clusters of live oaks will be • required to be removed to install a drainage basin, all other native trees on the site will be protected and preserved. Full urban services area available to the site. The project is consistent 043 ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 02/26/2002 with the maximum density permitted by the High Density Multi-Family General Plan Land Use Designation. • SITUATION AND FACTS: 1. Applicant: Jim Shores, PO Box 216, Atascadero, CA 93423, Phone: 805-466-2767 2. Property Owner: Raymond Marasse, 9385 Musselman Avenue, Atascadero, CA 93422 Phone: 805-466-9542 3. Representative: R. Thompson Consulting, 7400 Morro Road, Atascadero, CA 93422 Phone: 805-462-1375 4. Project Address: 9385 Mussleman Avenue, Atascadero, CA 93422 APN 030-461-054 5. General Plan Designation: HDMF (High Density Multi-Family) 6. Zoning District: RMF-16 (Residential Multiple Family 12 two-bedroom units per acre) 7. Site Area: 1.42 acre (net) • 8. Existing Use: Developed with a single family residence 9. Environmental Status: Proposed Negative Declaration posted December 24, 2001. Site description: The site is a relatively flat lot located at the end of Musselmen Drive between El Camino Real and Heilmann Park. The lot is developed with a single-family residence and accessory structure. The site is surrounded by multi-family units on the west, a mobile home park to the north, Heilmann Park to the east and Atascadero State Hospital to the south. DISCUSSION: Background: This item was heard by the Planning Commission on January 15, 2002 (minutes are attached). After deliberations, the Planning Commission moved to recommend the project to the City Council on a 4-0 vote. The Planning Commission added the following two conditions to the project: 1.) The public pedestrian access to Heilmann Park shall be reviewed and approved by the County Parks Department prior to the issuance of the public improvement permits for the project; and 2.) The wall around the retention basin shall not exceed 2-feet in height and shall be constructed with decorative materials. The applicant requested the Planning Commission modify the a condition of approval requiring that pervious pavers be installed on the portion of • Musselman Avenue that is under the dripline of the large native oak that is on the left of the road _ - 044 ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 02/26/2002 as you enter the project site. The Planning Commission did not modify the condition. The • following project analysis is based on the Planning Commission staff report. �.;3 -tic' 1b. _ 3 �� 6�r ` tar7t �L' ` -` Condition to Install Pavers The proposed density is consistent with the general plan and zoning regulations. The General Plan and zoning maps designate the property for "High Density Multi-family" development. The RMF-16 zoning district allows for up to seventeen, two-bedroom units to be constructed on a 1.42-acre lot. The project has been designed below the maximum density allowed in the RMF-16 zoning district. Analysiso Plannin Issues 1. Project Summary/PD-7 Consistency The proposed project consists of nine new detached, single-family units on individual lots that will be developed under the requirements of the PD-7 overlay district. The applicant has chosen two floor plans for the project . One floor plan is a 1282 square-foot (living area 869 s.f. / garage 413 s.f.) two-bedroom unit, the second unit is a larger 1461 square-foot (living area 996 s.f. / garage 465 s.f.) two-bedroom unit. The larger two-bedroom unit has a floor plan with two bedrooms and a "den". Under the RMF-16 density a third bedroom would be allowed in these units. All units will have an attached two-car garage with one additional uncovered space provided in the driveway. Each unit is consistent with the PD-7 requirement of providing a minimum of 40% of the parcel for landscaping and building foot prints of less than 35% of the parcel area. A Master Plan of Development will cover all site development and architectural design standards for the project. The Master Plan of Development will be approved in the form of a Conditional Use Permit as required by the Zoning Ordinance. As conditioned, changes to the Master Plan of Development can be made by the Planning Commission in the future without Council action. 04 -ry V ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 02/26/2002 Proposed Project Summary £F Lot t y dot 2 Lot Lot 4 Lat 5 Lat 6 Lot 7 Lo#8 Lot Lo t� • r s t Lot Area 5561 45311 4494 6166 4668 4121 4735 6265 5058 16115 Building Footprint(s.f.) 1461 1461 1461 1282 1282 1282 1461 1461 1461 1732 (not to exceed 35%) 26% 32% 33% 20% 27% 31% 31 23% 29% 10% Landscaped Area(s.f.) 2634 1866 1987 3878 2305 1642 1925 2655 2477 12000 (minimum 40%) 47% 41% 44% 63% 49% 40% 41 42% 49% 74% Covered Parking 2 spaces 2 spaces 2 spaces 2 spaces 2 spaces 2 spaces 2 spaces 2 spaces 2 spaces 2 spaces Guest Parking I 1 spacel 1 space 1 1 spacel 1 space 1 space 1 space 1 space 1 space 1 space 1 space 2. Design and Appearance The Master Plan of Development will control site design and appearance issues including landscaping and architecture. The project has been designed with two different single story floor plans that incorporate varying architectural materials, colors, and features. Architectural embellishments including window shutters or accented foam trim and covered front porches are included on all units. Staff has conditioned the project to include minor architectural upgrades to Scheme 4 and 5 to include a stone veneer or brick wainscot along the front and visible portions of the side elevations and a more defined porch element on Scheme 4. All trash storage and air conditioning condenser units will be screened from view behind fenced enclosures. The site landscape plan includes a variety of native and flowering accent trees. Existing native trees on the site have been incorporated into the site design and will enhance the new site landscaping. All landscape maintenance will be the responsibility of the individual property owner. The project has been conditioned to provide one five-gallon live oak on each lot as required by the Tree Ordinance. #r�MII/Y11rf ¢ b . • 046 ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 02/26/2002 S 4 f r. �■lN��HWM 3 r � �4�� Dii1llIR�II11 3. Oak Tree Removal and Preservation The site contains several large native oaks tree. The project has been designed and conditioned • to preserve and protect the native trees on the site with the exception of the cluster of small oaks that are located in the northeast corner of the lot where the site drainage basin is propose to be installed. Staff is recommending that the tree removals be mitigated by the payment of an in lieu fee of$2,200.00 to the Tree Mitigation Fund. V�il�'illf W W111 r € t/ d Cluster of native oak trees to be removed • Tree Mitigation Table 04 ! ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 02/26/2002 Evergreen Native Trees(inches) Deciduous Native Trees(inches) Totals dbh notes dbh notes 1 1 4-inches 2 2 4-inches 3 3 4-inches 4 4 4-inches 5 5 4-inches 6 4-inches 7 6-inches 8 6-inches 9 8-inches 10 8-inches 11 8-inches 12 6-inches Total 0-inches Total 66-inches 66-inches Mitigation RequiremE$200.00 per 6-in dbh Tree Fund Payment $ Tree Fund Payment: $ 2,200.00 1 $ 2,200.00 Porous paving blocks will replace conventional paving where the access road and individual driveways serving Lot 8 and Lot 9 encroach within the driplines of the two native trees located on those lots. The porous pavers will help prevent soil compaction, allow gases to escape from the soil which are toxic to tree roots when trapped in the soil by a solid covering, and allow oxygen to enter the soil which is essential for tree root growth. Pavers are not proposed to be installed on the portion of Musselman Drive that is near the 48-inch oak. Staff has conditioned the project to install pervious pavers in the location of paving that is wtihin the dripline of the tree, because it appears that the paving of the street will affect more than 25 percent of the canopy of the tree. Al II � nn * _ V 1 yy i{I I, t tiu t � Large Oak Tree to be Preserved • 048 ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 02/26/2002 �— w_•.' � \ fru IS- r \ ..LOT�5 T 6LOT 7 9§ \ a a'fxL. � '� � �. $✓ -' t1—'_ OT 5 Pavers — gA �1 LU1 3 ! �� `s 4 Y ✓ l Condition to _ 'Eli Install Pavers 4. Project Benefits One of the required findings for the approval for a planned development rezone is that the project • must "offer certain redeeming features to compensate for the requested modification." Due to the site's limited area, no room is available on site for any common recreational facilities. However, it appears that the project will have a number of"redeeming features" which include the following: 1) each unit will have a private yard area that will allow for outdoor recreational opportunities, 2) architectural and landscape features of the project have been designed to enhance the project's appearance and benefit the surrounding neighborhood, and 3) the project will provide a public pedestrian access to Heilmann Park. 5. Planned Development Density This site appears to be an appropriate site for a single-family Planned Development. The proposed project density is in conformance with the RMF-16 density standards. 6. Tract Map A ten-lot tract map is proposed as part of the project consistent with the Master Plan of Development. The tract map has been conditioned by staff and the City Engineer to meet all City standards including street frontage improvements and off-site improvements. The applicant will be required to record CC&R's for the map that will cover maintenance and access of common areas. 7. Road Abandonment: • The applicant is requesting to abandon a portion of the Musselman Avenue public right-of-way. The portion of Musselman proposed to be abandoned is not developed and intersects with Bane Road which is also a "paper" street. Bane Road is not required to be developed as part of the - - 049 ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 02/26/2002 project. The applicant is requesting to abandon the right-of-way because it is in the area of where the detention basin will be constructed. An eight-foot strip of public right-of-way along the south • property line will remain to provide a pedestrian link from Musselman Avenue to Heilmann Park. (See Drawing Next Page) California Streets and Highways Code: Under Section 8331 of the California Streets and Highways Code, a street may be abandoned if the following conditions exist: The street has been impassable for vehicular traffic for a period of five consecutive years and no public money was expended for maintenance on the street during such period. The Streets and Highways Code also requires that the abandoned road not cut off access to a person's property which adjoined a street or highway. The property that encompasses the right-of-way to be abandoned is under contiguous ownership and will not cut off access to any person's property. �OLMAN PARK Right-of-Way Proposed to be ltJY354:08 a�''1�'35'Yiy Abandoned LCT t' Vj J a f � ��a tj �• �G `ti` LC3 5 n 3 Y \k_��.�.j.,:�L•.!t�+r[iaY ' S it ..\ i Pedestrian Path La 19 3 T 4- Alt L k �� A.M.✓ T — The proposed abandonment is consistent with the state requirements for Summary Vacation because the onion of right-of-way to be abandoned is a paper road and has never been p g Y pP constructed or maintained for road purposes. The road abandonment will be required to be recorded concurrently with the tract map. • ISI 050 ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 02/26/2002 Public Improvements: • The City Engineer will require public improvements along the Musselman Drive property frontage. Curb, gutters, and sidewalks will be installed along a portion of the Musselman Avenue frontage, however sidewalks will not be required around the entire cul-de-sac. The sidewalk will terminate right before the bulb of the cul-de-sac. Musselman Avenue will be improved along the property frontage and a City Standard cul-de-sac will be installed at the end of Musselman Avenue. The applicant will be required to provide an improved public pedestrian access to connect Mussleman Avenue to Heilmann Park. Environmental Review: The initial study concluded that there would be no significant harm to the environment as a result of this subdivision, when mitigation measures are implemented. A proposed Negative Declaration has been prepared for the project and certification of the Negative Declaration is included in the draft resolution of approval. FISCAL IMPACT: The project would likely have a slight negative impact on City revenues. As a general rule, single-family dwellings require services that exceed the revenue generated by the dwelling. • CONCLUSIONS: • The subdivision is consistent with the Subdivision Ordinance; and • The Road Abandonment is consistent with the California Streets and Highways Code • The project density is in conformance with the General Plan; and • The project meets the Planned Development #7 standards contained in the City's Zoning Ordinance. ALTERNATIVES: 1. The City Council may approve the project subject to additional or revised project conditions. The Council's motion to approve needs to include any new or revised project conditions. 2. The Council may deny the project. The parcel would retain its designation of Residential • Multi-Family. 051 ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 02/26/2002 3. The Council may continue the hearing and refer the item back to staff for additional information or analysis. Direction should be given to staff and the applicant on required • information. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 -- Location Map (General Plan & Zoning) Attachment 2 -- Planning Commission 1/15/02 Meeting Minutes Attachment 3 -- Draft Resolution Attachment 4 -- Draft Ordinance Attachment 5 -- Draft Resolution Attachment 6 -- Draft Resolution Attachment 7 -- Draft Resolution • • ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 02/26/2002 • ATTACHMENT 1: Location Map (General Plan/Zoning) TTM 2001-0008 ZCH 2001-0019 CUP 2001-0050 Zoning: RMF-16 General Plan: High Density Multi-Family OmG �< "` f J \ • ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 02/26/2002 ATTACHMENT 3: Draft Resolution Negative Declaration 9385 Musselman Avenue DRAFT RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION OF THE ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL CERTIFYING NEGATIVE DECLARATION 2001-0053 PREPARED FOR ZONE CHANGE 2001-0019, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2001-0050, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2001-0008,AND ROAD ABANDONMENT 2001-0007 (9385 Musselman Avenue/APN 030-461-054 /Jim Shores) WHEREAS, an application has been received from Jim Shores, PO Box 216, Atascadero, CA 93423, (Applicant), and Raymond Marasse, 9385 Musselman Avenue, Atascadero, CA 93422, (Property Owner) to consider a project consisting of a zone change from RMF-16 (Residential Multi-Family) to RMF-16 / PD-7 (Residential Multi-Family with Planned Development Overlay 47) with the adoption of a Master Plan of Development, a ten-lot residential tentative tract map, and a request to abandon a portion of the Musselman Avenue public right-of-way on APN 030-461-054; and, WHEREAS, an Initial Study and Draft Negative Declaration 2001-0053 were prepared for the project and made available for public review in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero held a public hearing following the close of the review period for the Initial Study and Draft Negative Declaration to consider its adequacy; and, WHEREAS, the Atascadero City Council held a public hearing following the close of the review period for the Initial Study and Draft Negative Declaration to consider the proposed environmental determination and Planning Commission recommendation; and, NOW, THEREFORE, the Atascadero City Council, at a public hearing held on Tuesday, February 26, 2002, hereby resolves to certify Proposed Negative Declaration 2001-0053 based on the following Findings and as shown on Exhibit A: (a) The Negative Declaration has been completed in compliance with CEQA; and, (b) The Negative Declaration was presented to the Planning Commission, and the information contained therein was considered by the Planning Commission, prior to recommending action on the project for which it was prepared; and, (c) The project does not have the potential to create a significant environmental impact; and, • (d) The project will not achieve short-term to the disadvantage of long term environmental goals; and 055 ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 02/26/2002 (e) The projects does not have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable; and • (f) The project will not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings either directly or indirectly. On motion by Council Member , and seconded by Council Member the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ADOPTED: By: • Mike Arrambide, Mayor Attest: Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk Approved as to form: Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney • 056 ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 02/26/2002 Exhibit A: Proposed Negative Declaration • TTM 2001-0008/ZCH 2001-0053 'e:i ^'li7�f 191R ^ 8' 1979, 7 PROPOSED NEGATIVE DECLARATION#2001-0053 6500 Palma Avenue Atascadero, CA 93422 805/461-5035 Applicant: Jim Shores, PO Box 216, Atascadero, CA 93422 (Owner: Raymond Marasse) Project Title: Tentative Tract Map 2001-0008/Zone Change 2001-0019 Project 9385 Musselman Avenue, CA 93422, San Luis Obispo County APN 030-461-054 Location: Project Proposed rezone to Planned Development Overlay Zone PD-7,a 10-lot Tentative Tract Map to permit the Description: construction of 9 detached single family homes,and a request to abandon a portion of Musselman Avenue road right-of-way. The project is located on an existing lot currently developed with a single-family residence. The lot has slopes below 10%with several mature native oak trees located within the project site,several small clusters of live oaks will be required to be removed to install a drainage basin,all other native trees on the site will be protected and preserved. Full urban services area available to the site.The project is consistent with the maximum density permitted by the General Plan. General Plan Designation:High Density Multi-Family(HDMF) . Zoning District:RMF-16. Findings: 1. The project does not have the potential to degrade the environment. 2. The project will not achieve short-term to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals. 3. The project does not have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable. 4. The project will not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings either directly or indirectly. Determination: Based on the above findings, and the information contained in the initial study 2001-0053 (made a part hereof by reference and on file in the Community Development Department), it has been determined that the above project will not have an adverse impact on the environment when the following proposed mitigation measures are incorporated into the project(see attachment). Prepared By: Jamie Kirk, Associate Planner Date Posted: December 21,2001 Public Review Ends: January 15,2002 Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Tentative Tract Map 3. Master Plan of Development 4. Tree Removal List 5. Architectural Elevations • 057 ITEM NUMBER: B- I DATE: 02/26/2002 Attachment 4: Draft Ordinance • Zone Change: Planned Development#7 ZCH 2001-0019/TTM 2001-0008 DRAFT ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ATASCADERO AUTHORIZING ZONE CHANGE 2001-0019 THEREBY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP DISTRICT OF APN 030-461-054 FROM RMF-16 (RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY) TO RMF-16 /PD-7 (RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY WITH A PD-7 OVERLAY DISTRICT) SUBJECT TO A MASTER PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT. 9385 Musselman Avenue/APN 030-461-054 /Jim Shores) WHEREAS, an application has been received from Jim Shores, PO Box 216, Atascadero, CA 93423, (Applicant), and Raymond Marasse, 9385 Musselman Avenue, Atascadero, CA 93422, (Property Owner), to consider a project consisting of a zone change from RMF-16 (Residential Multi-Family) to RMF-16 / PD-7 (Residential Multi-Family with Planned Development Overlay 97) with the adoption of a Master Plan of Development, a ten-lot residential tentative tract map, and a request to abandon a portion of the Musselman Avenue public right-of-way on APN 030-461-054; and, WHEREAS, an Initial Study and Draft Negative Declaration 2001-0053 were prepared for the project and made available for public review in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and, WHEREAS, the site's General Plan Designation is HDMF (High Density Multi-Family; and, WHEREAS, the site's current zoning district is RMF-16 (Residential Multi-Family; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to enact this amendment to the Zoning Map to protect the health, safety and welfare of its citizens by applying orderly development of the City; and, WHEREAS, the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and public notice of environmental documents, as set forth in the State and local guidelines for implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) have been adhered to; and, WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed Public Hearing upon the subject Zone Change application was held by the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero at which hearing evidence, oral and documentary, was admitted on behalf of said Zoning amendments; and, • 058 ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 02/26/2002 WHEREAS, the Atascadero City Council, at a duly noticed Public Hearing held on • Tuesday, February 26, 2002, considered Zone Change 2001-0019, after first studying and considering the Proposed Negative Declaration prepared for the project, NOW, THEREFORE,the City Council does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. Findings for Approval of a Zone Change Creating a PD-7 Planned Development Overlay District. The City Council finds as follows: a) Modification of development standards or processing requirements is warranted to promote orderly and harmonious development. b) Modification of development standards or processing requirements will enhance the opportunity to best utilize special characteristics of an area and will have a beneficial effect on the area. c) Benefits derived from the overlay zone cannot be reasonably achieved through existing development standards or processing requirements. d) Proposed plans offer certain redeeming features to compensate for the requested modification. SECTION 2. Approval. The Council of the City of Atascadero, in a regular session • assembled on Tuesday, February 26, 2002 resolved to introduce for first reading an ordinance that would rezone the subject site consistent with the following: a) Exhibit A: Zone Change Map SECTION 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective a 12:01 a.m. on the 31St day after its final passage. On motion by Council Member , and seconded by Council Member the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted following roll call vote: AYES: • NOES: 059 ITEM PLUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 02/26/2002 ABSTAIN: ABSENT: • ADOPTED: By: Mike Arrambide, Mayor Attest: Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk Approved as to form: Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney • G60 ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 02/26/2002 Exhibit A: Zone Change Map • ZCH 2001-0019 Existing Zoning: RMF-16 Proposed Zoning: RMF 16(PD7) 9385 Musselman Avenue APN 030-461-054 �. e AM 4 �Nf V $ y 0 \X • 06i ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 02/26/2002 Attachment 5: Draft Resolution Master Plan of Development • ZCH 2001-0019/TTM 2001-0008 DRAFT RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION OF THE ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2001-0050, A MASTER PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT FOR THE PD-7 OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICT ON APN 030-461-054 (9385 Musselman Avenue/APN 030-461-054/Jim Shores) WHEREAS, an application has been received from Jim Shores, PO Box 216, Atascadero, CA 93423, (Applicant), and Raymond Marasse, 9385 Musselman Avenue, Atascadero, CA 93422, (Property Owner) to consider der a project consisting of a zone change from RMF-16 (Residential Multi-Family) to RMF-16 / PD-7 (Residential Multi-Family with Planned Development Overlay #7) with the adoption of a Master Plan of Development, a ten-lot residential tentative tract map, and a request to abandon a portion of the Musselman Avenue public right-of-way on APN 030-461-054; and, WHEREAS, the site's General Plan Designation is HDMF (High Density Multi-Family; and, WHEREAS, the site's current zoning district is RMF-16 (Residential Multi-Family; and, • WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended that a site be rezoned to include a PD-7 overlay district which requires the adoption of a Master Plan of Development; and, WHEREAS, the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and public notice of environmental documents, as set forth in the State and local guidelines for implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) have been adhered to; and, WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed Public Hearing upon the subject Zone Change application was held by the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero at which hearing evidence, oral and documentary, was admitted on behalf of said Master Plan of Development; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, at a Public Hearing held on January 15, 2002, studied and considered the Master Plan of Development for Zone Change 2001-0019, after first studying and considering the Draft Negative Declaration prepared for the project, and, WHEREAS, the Atascadero City Council, at a duly noticed Public Hearing held on . February 26, 2002, studied and considered the Master Plan of Development (CUP 2001-0050), 062 ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 02/26/2002 after first studying and considering the Proposed Negative Declaration prepared for the project; • and , NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council takes the following actions: SECTION 1. Findings for Approval for Amendment of the Master Plan of Development. The City Council finds as follows: 1. The proposed project or use is consistent with the General Plan and the City's Appearance Review Manual; and, 2. The proposed project or use satisfies all applicable provisions of the Title (Zoning Ordinance) including the PD-7 Ordinance; and, 3. The establishment, and subsequent operation or conduct of the use will not, because of the circumstances and conditions applied in the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of the general public or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the use, or be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity of the use; and, 4. That the proposed project or use will not be inconsistent with the character or the immediate neighborhood or contrary to its orderly development; and, 5. That the proposed use or project will not generate a volume of traffic beyond the safe capacity of all roads providing access to the project, either existing or to be • improved in conjunction with the project, or beyond the normal traffic volume of the surrounding neighborhood that would result from full development in accordance with the Land Use Element. SECTION 2. Approval. The Atascadero City Council, in a regular session assembled on February 26, 2002 resolved to approve the Master Plan of Development (CUP 2000-0050) subject to the following: a) EXHIBIT A: Conditions of Approval b) EXHIBIT B: Site Plan C) EXHIBIT C: Statistical Summary of Project d) EXHIBIT D: Landscape Plan e) EXHIBIT E: Grading and Drainage Plan f) EXHIBIT F: Elevations and Exterior Colors and Materials g) EXHIBIT F: Elevations and • On motion by Council Member , and seconded by Council Member the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted following roll call vote: 063 ITEM NUMBER: B- l DATE: 02/26/2002 AYES: • NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ADOPTED: I By: Mike Arrambide, Mayor Attest: Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk Approved as to form: Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney • 064 ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 02/26/2002 Exhibit A: Conditions of Approval • CUP 2001-0050: PD-7 Master Plan of Development Conditions of Approval Timing Responsibility CUP 2001-0050 /Monitoring PS:Planning Services Conditions Amended at the 1/15/02 Planning Commission BL License BS:Building Services GP Grradingading Permit FD:Fire Deparlment Meeting BP Building Permit PD:Police Department R:Final Inspection CE:City Engineer TO:Temporary occupancy WW:Wastewater FO--Fnal occupancy CA:City Attomey Planning Services 1. The approval of this use permit shall become final and PS effective following the end of the referendum period for Zone Change 2001-0019. 2. Approval of this Master Plan of Development shall be valid BP PS concurrently with the life of Tentative Tract Map 2001-0008 and then indefinitely following final map. The Master Plan of Development approval shall expire and become null and void unless a final map is recorded consistent with the Master Plan of Development. is 3. The Community Development Department shall have the BP/FM PS authority to approve minor changes to the project the (1) increase the intensity of the project by less than 10%, (2) result in a superior site design or appearance, and/or (3) address a construction design issue that is not substantive to the Master Plan of Development. The Planning Commission shall have the final authority to approve any other changes to the Master Plan of Development and any associated Tentative Maps. 4. All subsequent Tentative Tract Maps and construction BP/FM PS permits shall be consistent with the Master Plan of Development contained herein. 5. All exterior elevations, finish materials and colors shall be BP PS consistent with the Master Plan of Development as shown in EXHIBIT. 6. All site development shall be consistent with the maximum BP/FM PS intensities described in the statistical project summary as shown on EXHIBIT. 7. All site work, grading and site improvements shall be BP/FM PS consistent with the Master Plan of Development as shown in EXHIBIT,and EXHIBIT. 8. Native oaks trees shall be preserved and protected during BP PS construction consistent with the Tree Protection Plan • prepared for the project (Steve Alvarez, Certified Arborist, August 9, 2001) Tree protection shall be in place prior,to the issuance of any construction permits. 065 ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 02/26/2002 Conditionsof Approval Timing Responsibility y CUP 2001-0050 /Monitoring PS:Planning Services • Conditions Amended at the 1/15/02 Planning Commission GP:GradingPness Permit BS:BireDgServces GP:Grading Penrct FD:Fre Department Meeting BP:Building Permit PD:Police Depatment Fl:Final Inspection CE:City Engineer TO:Temporary Occupancy WW:Wastewater F0:Final Occupancy CA City Attorney 9. Pervious pavers shall replace traditional paving in the area shown below: tl �L - t:, - - 14 6. . R # - 10. A final landscape and irrigation plan shall be approved prior BP PS to the issuance of building permits and included as part of site improvement plan. All exterior meters, air conditioning • units and mechanical equipment shall be screened with landscape material. 11. Tree Mitigation:$2,200.00 Tree Mitigation Fee Evergreen Native Trees(inches) Deciduous Native Trees(inches) Totals dbh notes dbh notes 1 1 4-inches 2 2 4-inches 3 3 4-inches 4 4 4-inches 5 5 4-inches 6 4-inches 7 6-inches 8 6-inches 9 8-inches 10 8-inches 11 8-inches 12 6-inches Total 0-inches Total 66-inches 66-inches Mitigation Requirenne$200.00 per 6-in dbh Tree Fund Payment: $ - Tree Fund Payment: $ 2,200.00 $ 2,200.00 The tree mitigation fee shall be paid prior to the issuance of the building permit. 12. One five-gallon native oak tree shall be planted on Lot FO PS 1 through Lot 9. • 066 ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 02/26/2002 Conditions of Approval Timing Responsibility • CUP 2001-0050 /Monitoring PS:Planning Services Conditions Amended at the 1/15/02 Planning Commission PL,Business emit BS:Building Services Ca ung Permit FD:Fre Departinent Meeting BP.Building Permit PD:PoliceDepartrnent FL-Final Inspection CE City Engineer TQ Temporary Occupancy WW:Wastewater Fa.Final Occupancy CA City Attorney 13. Architectural upgrades shall be provided on the front BP PS and side elevations of the exterior elevations for Scheme 4 and 5. The upgrades shall include a stone veneer or brick wainscot along the front and visible portions of the side elevations. 14. A defined porch feature and a secondary color BP PS element shall be provided for Scheme 4. 15. The public pedestrian access to Heilmann Park shall be BP PS reviewed and approved by the County Parks Department prior to the issuance of the public improvement permits for the project. 16. The wall around the retention basin shall not exceed 2- BP PS feet in height and shall be constructed with decorative materials. • -end of conditions- • 06r ITEM NUMBER: B- I DATE: 02/26/2002 EXHIBIT B:Site Plan CUP 2001-0050: PD-7 Master Plan of Development • I—__—� ==r �.,�� � �+ }LOT � 1.�T 8 f�°'j�� \ `� ^\s,• MY > -a a \ \ % I r ey ..: � v�s!ows �xscra att�uazw:,m,c� • 068 ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 02/26/2002 • EXHIBIT C:Statistical Summary of Project CUP 2001-0050: PD-7 Master Plan of Development Lot 1 Lot 2 Lot 3 Lot 4 Lofi 5 g Lot 6 .-'Lot 7 Lofi 8 Loo , , Lot,10 Lot Area 5561 4531 4494 6166 4668 4121 4735 6265 50581 16115 Building Footprint(s.f.) 1461 1461 1461 1282 1282 1282 1461 1461 14611 1732 (not to exceed 35%) 26% 32% 33% 20% 27% 31% 31 23% 29% 10% Landscaped Area(s.f.) 2634 1866 1987 3878 2305 1642 1925 2655 2477 12000 (minimum 40%) 47% 41% 44% 63% 49% 40% 41F 42% 49% 74% Covered Parking 2 spaces 2 spaces 2 spaces 2 spaces 2 spaces 2 spaces 2 spacesl 2 spaces 2 spaces 2 spaces Guest Parking 1 space 1 space 1 space 1 space 1 space 1 space 1 space 1 space 1 space 1 space • 069 ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 02/26/2002 EXHIBIT D: Landscape Plan CUP 2001-0050: PD-7 Master Plan of Development • \ LOT 3• Lor \ .LOT 7 \ / IT, 'y',�\ PLANT SYMBM LEGEND ISOs RAW 0" awwc s na tour%W Gomm an amw no ED faiuO am ms a ,elf, � near• a O rasnrls ee.•sme► • x p moo ftw rLumm n I•� fioi•es arrne•ewms•r a •ox ® L#—� n ala ® d m•am Imulmsmammum • t Ira 6) imm"AgANWA " s ,to a aw Q Yux� • •GAL 0 U' ••aaa•D a• ,x vase frrrwle 0 U E•AL GROUND COVERS Em-9---an== =Qee.o�+v m was nwuMae �f+'-r elver uatac rims ��t4�ua aa*6alnlaE mwrC aw ruol war eta r!a W mo Ifrnuov R OL e1Q1•!1.6i6R r0id • 070 ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 02/26/2002 EXHIBIT E: Grading and Drainage Plan • CUP 2001-0050: PD-7 Master Plan of Development HEUAN PARK -- � STREET --_- \\w \ _- fT' ' 1. 38.9 �l 93�• ,� w a w!m 41.50 I \\ I _ f I �L�yq'•� ® rr.w rurx FF tosw rarw •rwrr I I � msw a�� �' r � i Ic 4 rtYr 6 y rrr a � • 071 ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 02/26/2002 EXHIBIT F: ELEVATIONS AND COLOR AND MATERIALS CUP 2001-0050: PD-7 Master Plan of Development • _.. Tm �uiur rs i 47 �7 ago raa�waax■ i E ` � c i f-F S • 072 ITEM NUMBER: B- I DATE: 02/26/2002 EXHIBIT G: FLOOR PLANS • CUP 2001-0050: PD-7 Master Plan of Development Qj i Floor Plan Schemes 1 through 3 • I � I . C, i { Floor Plan Schemes 4 and 5 • 073 ITEM NUMBER: - DATE: 2/26/02 • Attachment 5 Draft Resolution Road Abandonment 2001-0007 DRAFT RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL SUMMARILY VACATING A PORTION OF THE MUSSELMAN AVENUE RIGHT-OF-WAY PURSUANT TO SECTION 8331 OF THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE ROAD ABANDONMENT 2001-0007 (9385 Musselman Avenue/APN 030-461-054/Jim Shores) WHEREAS, an application has been received from Jim Shores, PO Box 216, Atascadero, CA 93423, (Applicant), and Raymond Marasse, 9385 Musselman Avenue, Atascadero, CA 93422, (Property Owner) to consider a project consisting of a zone change from RMF-16 (Residential Multi-Family) to RMF-16 / PD-7 (Residential Multi-Family with Planned Development Overlay#7) with the adoption of a Master Plan of Development, a ten- lot residential tentative tract map, and a request to abandon a portion of the Musselman Avenue public right-of-way on APN 030-461-054; and, WHEREAS, the proposed project area has a General Plan Designation of High Density Multi-Family and the project is in conformance with the Circulation Element of the General Plan and all other applicable General Plan policies; and WHEREAS, the portion of the Musselman Avenue right-of way, as shown on the attached Exhibit A, has been never been improved and has been impassable for vehicular travel for a period of five consecutive years and no public money has been expended for maintenance on the street during such period; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the proposed Road Abandonment on January 15, 2002 at 7:00 p.m. and considered testimony and reports from staff, the applicants , and the public; WHEREAS, the Atascadero City Council, at a duly noticed Public Hearing held on February 26, 2002, studied and considered the Road Abandonment (RAB 2001-0007), after first studying and considering the Proposed Negative Declaration prepared for the project; and , NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council takes the following actions: SECTION 1. Findings of Approval. The City Council find as follows: 1. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan. • 074 ITEM NUMBER: DATE: 2/26/02 • 2. The portion of Musselman Avenue right-of-way proposed to be abandoned has been impassable for vehicular travel for a period of five consecutive years and no public money has been expended for maintenance on the street during such period. SECTION 2. Approval. The Atascadero City Council, in a regular session assembled on February 26, 200 resolved to approve the Road Abandonment request subject to the following: 1. EXHIBIT A: Road Abandonment Map 2. EXHIBIT B: Conditions of Approval. On motion by Council Member , and seconded by Council Member the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted following roll call vote: AYES: i NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ADOPTED: By: Mike Arrambide, Mayor Attest: Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk Approved as to form: • 07 -0 ITEM NUMBER: - DATE: 2/26/02 • Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney EXHIBIT A: Road Abandonment Map RAB 2001-0007 HERMAN PARC Area proposed to be abandoned ariE -41 r � \ - r r� - yam,..,..... }• -2. �t177 3 �a LOT 1LOT a 3 Pedestrian Path: � tpT 7GLor 5 \ (Right-of-Way to - _mss - t remain) Ak E54 • 076 ITEM NUMBER: DATE: 2/26/02 • Attachment 6 Draft Resolution Tentative Tract Map 2001-0008 ZCH 2001-0019/TTM 2001-0008/CUP 2001-0050/RAB 2001-0007 DRAFT RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2001-0008 THEREBY ALLOWING A TEN LOT RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF APN 030-461-054 CONSISTENT WITH THE PD-7 MASTER PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT (CUP 2001-0050) (93 85 Musselman Avenue/APN 030-461-054/Jim Shores) WHEREAS, an application has been received from Jim Shores, PO Box 216, Atascadero, CA 93423, (Applicant), and Raymond Marasse, 9385 Musselman Avenue, Atascadero, CA 93422, (Property Owner) to consider a project consisting of a zone change from RMF-16 (Residential Multi-Family) to RMF-16 / PD-7 (Residential Multi-Family with Planned Development Overlay 147`7) with the adoption of a Master Plan of Development, a ten- lot residential tentative tract map, and a request to abandon a portion of the Musselman Avenue public right-of-way on APN 030-461-054; and, • WHEREAS, the sites General Plan Designation is HDMF (High Density Multi- Family; and, WHEREAS, the site's current zoning district is RMF-16 (Residential Multi-Family; and, WHEREAS,the Planning Commission has recommended that a site be rezoned to include a PD-7 overlay with a Master Plan of Development allowing a ten lot subdivision of the site; and, WHEREAS, the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and public notice of environmental documents, as set forth in the State and local guidelines for implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) have been adhered to; and, WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed Public Hearing upon the subject Tentative Parcel Map application was held by the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero at which hearing evidence, oral and documentary, was admitted on behalf of said application; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, at a Public Hearing • held on January 15, 2002, approved Tentative Tract Map 2001-0008, after first studying and considering the Draft Negative Declaration prepared for the project; and, 078 ITEM NUMBER: • DATE: 2/26/02 WHEREAS, the Atascadero City Council, at a duly noticed Public Hearing held on February 26, 2002 studied and considered Tentative Tract Map 2001-0008, after first studying and considering the Proposed Negative Declaration prepared for the project; and, NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council takes the following actions: Section One. Findings of Approval for Tentative Tract May, the Atascadero City Council finds as follows: a) The proposed subdivision, as conditioned, is consistent with the General Plan and applicable zoning requirements. b) The design and improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan and applicable zoning requirements. c) The proposed subdivision, as conditioned, is consistent with the Planned Development Overlay District#7 Master Plan of Development (CUP 2001-0050). • d) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. e) The site is physically suitable for the density of development proposed. f) The design and improvement of the proposed subdivision will not cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish and wildlife or their habitat. g) The design of the subdivision will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through, or the use of property within, the proposed subdivision; or substantially equivalent alternative easements are provided. h) The proposed subdivision design and type of improvements proposed will not be detrimental to the health, safety or welfare of the general public. Section 2. Approval. The Atascadero City Council, in a regular session assembled on February 26, 2002, resolved to approve the Tentative Tract Map (TTM 2001-0008) subject to the following: a) Exhibit A: Tentative Tract Map 2001-0008 b) Exhibit B: Conditions of Approval • 079 ITEM NUMBER: DATE: 2/26/02 • On motion by Council Member ,and seconded by Council Member the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ADOPTED: By: Mike Arrambide, Mayor Attest: . Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk Approved as to form: Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney • 080 ITEM NUMBER: • DATE: 2/26/02 Exhibit A:Tentative Tract Map TTM 2001-0008 VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP p� TRACT 2444 +g' .,w,m a nc•usrwouo caar n 2 : nLc mwn a s•x we mmo,rxraw. -•mac, \ _ _-D,R2��' -__- �� t7 1 'IAT,- 14 `i-, j1y Lam 1 � `'.i�tC1?'^� tarue roLamc r..cr�lw as • 081 ITEM NUMBER: DATE: 2/26/02 • EXHIBIT B: Conditions of Approval TTM 2001-0008 Conditions of Approval Timing Responsibility Mitigation /Monitoring Measure 9385 Musselman Avenue PM:Parcel Map GP:Grating Pemit PS:Planrvng Services BP:Building Pemit BS:Buadng Services TO:Temporary Occupancy FD:Re Depararment Tentative Tract Map 2001-0008 F0:Final Occupancy PD:Police Department PI:Public Irnprovements CE City Engineer YMl:Waslevater CA Cky Anomey AlWC:Atavadem Mutual Water Company Planning Services 1. The approval of this application shall become final, subject PM PS to the completion of the conditions of approval, fourteen (14) days following the Planning Commission approval unless prior to the time, an appeal to the decision is filed as set forth in Section 9-1.111(b)of the Zoning Ordinance. 2. Approval of this Tentative Tract Map shall be valid for two PM PS • years after its effective date. At the end of the period, the approval shall expire and become null and void unless an extension of time is granted pursuant to a written request received prior to the expiration date. 3. The Community Development Department shall have the PM PS authority to approve minor changes to the project that (1) result in a superior site design or appearance, and/or (2) address a construction design issue that is not substantive to the Tentative Parcel Map. 4. The Tract Map shall be subject to additional fees for park or PM PS recreation purposes (QUIMBY Act) as required by City Ordinance. 5. The applicant shall record CC&R's for the subdivision subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer,City Attorney and Planning Department. The CC&R's shall identify the maintenance responsibilities of all private driveways, sewer facilities, drainage facilities, common parking areas, site lighting, landscape areas, fencing, and other common facilities. The CC&R's shall also state that each unit shall have no more than three bedrooms and that all exterior colors, exterior materials, and yard fencing shall be consistent with the overall master plan of development. 6. The granting of this entitlement shall apply to the property On going PS located at 9331-9351 Musselman Drive (APN 030-461-047 and APN 030-461-049)regardless of owner. 082 ITEM NUMBER: DATE: 2/26/02 • I Conditions of Approval Timing Responsibility Mitigation /Monitoring Measure 9385 Musselman Avenue PM:Parcel Map GP:Grading Permit PS:Planning Services BP:Building Penn BS:Building Services TO:Temporary Occupancy FD:Fre Department Tentative Tract Map 2001-0008 FO:Final Occupancy PD:Police Department PI:Public Improvements CE:City Engineer WW:Wastewater CA City Attorney AMWC:Atascadero Mutual Water Company 7. Pervious pavers shall replace traditional paving in the area PI pS shown below: L ` SLI � 4 _ a it 3 � �u,>I .,3 •'�� q� `� I Yom_ 8 g .:.. � '�$1, •f F ` fie.ti,M_— ;t 8. The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless Ongoing CA the City of Atascadero or its agents, officers, and employees against any claim or action brought to challenge an approval by the city, or any of its entities, concerning the subdivision 9. A tract map drawn in substantial conformance with the PM PS approved tentative map, and in compliance with all conditions set forth herein, shall be submitted for review and approval in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City's Subdivision Ordinance. Engineering Conditions: PROJECT SPECIFIC CONDITIONS 10. A complete hydrology report supporting the stormwater GP CE collection/treatment/disposal design will be required prior to Grading Permit approval. 11. Street Improvement plans shall incorporate design of PI CE handicap access to the new path from the sidewalk on Mussellman Ave. SANITARY SEWER CONDITIONS • 12. All sewer facilities within the project boundary shall remain Ongoing WW private and shall not become a part of the City. 083 ITEM NUMBER: DATE: 2/26/02 • Conditions of Approval Timing Responsibility Mitigation /Monitoring Measure 9385 Musselman Avenue PM:Parcel Map GP:Grading Pemvt PS:Planning Services BP:Building Permit BS:Building Servos Fire T0:Temporary ary Occupancy Department Tentative Tract Map 2001-0008 FO:Final Occupancy PD:Police Department PI:Public Improvements CE:City Engineer WW:Wastewater CACity Attorney AMWC:Atascadero Mutual Water Company 13. Applicant shall submit maintenance agreements for all FM WW sewer mains within the project boundary for review and approval by the City Attorney and the City Engineer. 14. Newly created lots are subject to the payment of sewer FM WW extension fees 15. Sanitary Sewer main extension plans shall be submitted for BP WW review and approval by the Public Works Department prior to the start of construction. Plans shall include a profile view of all sewer mainlines. Elevations and stationing on new plans shall conform to elevation and stationing on existing city approved plans. STANDARD CONDITIONS 16. All public improvements shall be constructed in FM CE • conformance with the City of Atascadero Engineering Department Standard Specifications and Drawings or as directed by the City Engineer. 17. In the event that the applicant is allowed to bond for the public improvements required as a condition of this map, the applicant shall enter into a Subdivision Improvement Agreement with the City Council. 18. An engineer's estimate of probable cost shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer to determine the amount of the bond. 19. The Subdivision Improvement Agreement shall record concurrently with the Final Map. 20. The applicant shall enter into a Plan Check/inspection agreement with the City. 21. The applicant shall be responsible for the relocation and/or alteration of existing utilities. 22. The applicant shall install all new utilities (water, gas, electric, cable TV and telephone) underground. Utilities shall be extended to the property line frontage of each lot or its public utility easement. 23. The applicant shall monument all property corners for • construction control and shall promptly replace them if disturbed. 084 ITEM NUMBER: • DATE: 2/26/02 Conditions Of Approval Timing Responsibility Mitigation /Monitoring Measure 9385 Musselman Avenue PM:Parcel Map GP:Grading Permit PS:Planning Services BP:Building Permit BS:Building Services TO:Temporary Occupancy FD:Fire Department Tentative Tract Map 2001-0008 FO:Fined Occupancy PD:Police Department PI:Public Improvements CE City Engineer WW:Wastewater CA City Attorney AMC:Atascadero Mutual Water Company 24. The applicant shall acquire title interest in any off-site land that may be required to allow for the construction of the improvements.The applicant shall bear all costs associated with the necessary acquisitions. The applicant shall also gain concurrence from all adjacent property owners whose ingress and egress is affected by these improvements. 25. Slope easements shall be provided as needed to accommodate cut of fill slopes. 26. Drainage easements shall be provided as needed to accommodate both public and private drainage facilities. 27. The final map shall be signed by the City Engineer prior to the map being placed on the agenda for City Council acceptance. • 28. Prior to recording the tract map,the applicant shall submit a j map drawn in substantial conformance with the approved tentative map and in compliance with all conditions set forth herein. The map shall be submitted.for review and approval by the City in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City's Subdivision Ordinance. 29. Prior to recording the tract map, the applicant shall set monuments at all new property corners. A registered civil engineer or licensed land surveyor shall indicate by certificate on the parcel map, that corners have been set or shall be set by a date specific and that they will be sufficient to enable the survey to be retraced. 30. Prior to recording the tract map, the applicant shall pay all outstanding plan check/inspection fees. 31. Prior to recording the map, the applicant shall complete all improvements required by these conditions of approval. 32. Prior to recording the tract map,the applicant shall have the map reviewed by all applicable public and private utility companies (cable, telephone, gas, electric, Atascadero Mutual Water Company). The applicant shall obtain a letter from each utility company indicating their review of the map. The letter shall identify any new easements that may be required by the utility company. A copy of the letter shall be submitted to the City. New easements shall be shown on • the map. 33. Upon recording the final map, the applicant shall provide the City with a black line clear Mylar 0.4 mil copy and a f�85 ITEM NUMBER: _ DATE: 2/26/02 • Conditions of Approval Timing Responsibility Mitigation /Monitoring Measure 9385 Musselman Avenue PM:Parcel Map GP:Grading Permit PS:Planning Services BP:Building Pemdt BS:Building Services TO:Temporary Occupancy FD:Fire Department Tentative Tract Map 2001-0008 FO:FinalOccupancy PD:Police Department PI:Public Improvements CE:City Engineer WW:Wastewater CA City Attomey AMWC:Atascadero Mutual Water Company blue line print of the recorded map. 34. Prior to the final inspection of any public improvements,the applicant shall submit a written statement from a registered civil engineer that all work has been completed and is in full compliance with the approved plans. 35. Prior to the final inspection, the applicant shall submit a written certification from a registered civil engineer or land surveyor that all survey monuments have been set as shown on the final map. 36. An encroachment permit shall be obtained prior to any work within City rights of way. 37. Prior to the issuance of building permits the applicant shall submit a grading and drainage plan prepared by a • registered civil engineer for review and approval by the City Engineer. Atascadero Mutual Water Company(AMWC): 38. Prior to recording the map,the applicant shall prepare plans FM AMWC that show all existing and proposed water distribution facilities required to provide water service to the subdivision. The plans shall be submitted for review and approval by the Atascadero Mutual Water Company. All water distribution facilities shall be constructed in conformance with the Atascadero Mutual Water Company standards and policies. 39. Prior to recording the parcel map the applicant shall obtain BP AMWC -- a "Will Serve" letter from Atascadero Mutual Water Company. 40. Prior to the start of construction, the applicant shall pay all BP AMWC installation and connection fees required by the Atascadero Mutual Water Company. 41. Prior to the start of construction, the applicant shall provide BP AMWC to Atascadero Mutual Water Company a notarized recorded copy of a 15-foot wide private utility easement that extends from the water main extension termination point, east to the property line at Bane Street. • 086 ITEM NUMBER: • DATE: 2/26/02 Conditions of Approval Timing Responsibility Mitigation /Monitoring Measure 9385 Musselman Avenue PM:Parcel Map GP:Grading Perrdt PS:Planning Services BP:Building Permit BS:Building Services TO:Temporary Occupancy FD:Fre Department Tentative Tract Map 2001-0008 FO:Final Occupancy PD:Police Department PI:Public Improvements CE:City Engineer WW:Wastewater CA City Attorney AMWC:Atascadero Mutual Water Company Building Department Conditions FM AMWC 42. A soils investigation prepared by a licensed Geotechnical BP AMWC Engineer is to be provided for the project. The report is to be provided at the time of building permit submittal along with the building plans for review by the Building Division. Recommendations contained in the report are to be incorporated into the project plans. Fire Marshall Conditions 43. Provide a fire hydrant within the public right-of-way at the BP FD cul-de-sac. Hydrant is to be constructed per City standards. 44. Provide appropriate address signage at each residence. In BP FD addition, a sign is to be provided at the entrance to the project off of the cul-de-sac listing the addresses located within the project. 45. Note on the plans that signage or striping is to be provided FO FD along the street frontages and at the fire department turnaround which clearly indicate that parking is prohibited. Signage shall read"NO PARKING—FIRE LANE". • 087 ITEM NUMBER: C- 1 DATE: 02/26/2002 • isis ; �, t e CM Atascadero City Council Staff Report -Administrative Services Department 2001 Audit Report RECOMMENDATION: Council review and accept the audit report for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2001. DISCUSSION: The firm of Moss, Levy and Hartzheim performed the audit and a representative of the firm will be at the Council meeting to present the audit. 2000-2001 was another good financial year for the City of Atascadero. The economy remained • strong although it showed signs of slowing. Serious worries about the State deficit and terrorism had not yet struck by the close of the fiscal year, so the financial picture appeared strong. Sales tax revenues increased by 10.98% due in part to the opening of Home Depot, while the strong 1999-2000 real estate market pushed an increase in property tax revenues of 5.58%. Building and Planning revenues decreased from the previous year, however they were still far above the 5 year average. Other Revenues also increased by over $300,000 due to a change in the method of reporting PERS contributions. This PERS revenue was offset by an equal increase in PERS expenditures throughout the organization. At June 30, 2001, the City had an Unreserved General Fund Balance of $2,448,632. This represents a reserve of approximately 22% of annual budgeted expenditures and other outgo or less than three months of operations. This also does not take into account the almost $10 million in general fund deferred maintenance and unfunded liabilities. In fiscal year 2000-2001, the City spent over $2,916,000 on capital expenditures. Some of the expenditures included the El Camino Rehabilitation Project, the El Camino Widening Project, the Curbaril Ave Overlay Project, the Monterey Road Overlay Project, and the San Anselmo Overlay Project. The City appears to be in better financial shape than it has been in several years, however the City still has many financial obstacles ahead of it. • ATTACHMENTS: General Fund Summary and Comparison Financial Statements for the Year Ended June 30, 2001 089 \ \° \° \ \ \° \° \ \0 \ \ \ \ \ O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � V Oi DO DO V) N 00 t` l- M \O O t- \O CT --� ++ a� rl� O t, \O p) lO C3 N O O - Cr W' y R V) O \O M M O N � It to O O Cl) 110 O cq a w CT N \O 0000 r- oo10 \O d n 000 O 00 O V C1 N -- C', O CT CT 't 00 00 M O It t- O — 00 r- r- N 00 C� N to y O M r- O NO M �t O o0 O •-+ O o0 cr CT o0 R R 00 M t` M G1 O M �Y Vl N N d' O � N N N S - 00 O 00 V y ❑ A w 69 yq ^y O M M o0 O O \O O 00 N S M V) — 00 M V') \O \O to V7 O oo ch v1 N 00 00 N a� 00 \O \o r- M M O l- O � o0 M O S \O N V) O \O 00 \O C- M CT N N Gly O > w - O O , w � OUM ds a Q w O O rt M O\ M 00 O O to O 00 N N tM 0*1 to .-1 7 \O "O to \G 10 tn O t- N qT 00 O 11 00 00 M 1.4 d is Op M \o \O Ol Gl� M M [^ M oo M kn .-- M m O N t- 00 O t-Z O O C1 N C� 00 C� N O b N O M 7 O CN t- �O to \O M 110 \O \O r- 'ct M M M M M 1-1 N .4 - N ti M 00 t i M d cl A U F'' z CD 0 0 0 0 0 o o — O O CD r- O O C:) 0 0 00 . ~ G=1 0 0 0 M O O D O \O r- Q O M v') O O O — d1 S O O N \O O n O v? C N O R M O oo OCl M Q 00 O to O \O V1 V) O kn M M C1 — r- N It O (7,\ 00 a � O V 00 N r- a,\ \.O tn O) V7 � to ci r- r- V7 O O O \D 00 N Itt N N N - N N r+ 00 M N N O w z w c7 O \O to M 00 In \p N d' M M It O\ M l- O O V) M "t M �o O r- r- N O M N l- 00 00 V) O .. CT 00 \O t- \O .--� to -t a\ 00 r+ to M to O, [- r- Q1 N \O .- .� CT N lir Q\ CT (0 M CT O O O\ r- O qrM O N \O o0 d 41 O M — 01 \O N � \O C1 \O M M \D r- N :t -- to N N N - ct N r+ .- kn d� y d N N O O ►'7 69 69 a � x cn ' a. a o CJ a y p O p U 4r U O cci O �i 00 pa w CLl O C7 Ov� a a: N a a zco cl " U w a: O • 09u d O 0 y O t w oo N N CN 00 ao m to 01 to to m 00 (01\m -- N 00 O � [- M V 01 00 th l� M v) O �/"� v) M 00 M • aCi ca v\ 00 W� N v1 N 00 Vi �i 00 .— 01 M O O v) O1 M v) N N N M M M 01 O O O v) t N — o0 — \O M V M N — l- to M \D 01 O y OLn 00 00 f C� M N Ol� O O'� O O� l- O \J \o kr) \o N M O\ q N \O l� '"' 00 M O 11 M rl No M \p .�• - N \O 00 .-- L M O v) N w Eoq ds z .. �. y p O 110 M 01 v) N (- cn O N \D tn O CC 't ti \1O vNi� oo 000 N \,o t- C,, M �t 00 Cd ►a-I N M kr N 00 In \O C M r- Q1 > > v) 00 coq FSI O 69 A � \C tfi O to O et t` N N 00 M N O 00 IV to 0 0 a\ \O \p 1-I t- \O le t- O t- C1 -4 t- oo 00 N Q Q ^C O oo O 00 "1 It N 7 N 00 M (71 C1 t- en N O '- It I M U >4 ,� N \O .-y O M N N N 00 N \D M C1 "I tK \p tz M \C \C C1 .- (/j \o 00 l� \O N IV M \p N C\ O O N O 00 'IT 00 Q O N Itr IV C*� 00 M M N C1 tI i O cn bR A " z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r— 0 0 0 00 0 00 0 GLI M oo N M \o N NM v) M M t` M a, N U y «, M o0 v) O C1 00 [� C cn v) [� 00 a\ O O l� G1 V, w d 00 O O, v) o r, 'n \o \D t` O v) r- ., \o O\ \O 00 N N ~ \Oo N N OM1 � '�_ N N M O 01 t M "" V � M M N v7 � to to tIi O \p a\ N M to � M M t N \O M N et to C1 M C1 � C1 t- N C1 7 C1 O O N to rf \O O N \O BS .-- a\ M •'-I O O t` 00 W C\ O C1 W 00 C1 r-I -- M M p C DD '-I tI i O M \o M IV 'IT 00 00 N 00 O C\ O I�r N N M u •- '-I M I�r M NT .--I M t- t- � h bR y9 C O ci y i > Q v5 d ° W y " to �' y C�3a> W 0941 ITEM NUMBER: C-2 ■!��"®� `�"'' j DATE 02/26/2002 isa ��SCADEj�// Atascadero City Council Staff Report - Public Works Department 2002 Community Development Block Grant Allocation RECOMMENDATION: City Council forward to the County Board of Supervisors allocation recommendations for the 2002 Community Development Block Grant(CDBG) funds as follows: Public Facilities North County Women's Resource Center/Shelter—Kitchen Cabinets 6,000 Loaves and Fishes—New Roof 11,260 City of Atascadero—Infrastructure Improvements 77,233 • Public Services—Maximum 15% = $36,340 El Camino Homeless Organization—Motel Vouchers/Salary for Manager 14,820 E.O.C. —Forty Wonderful Program—Health Screening 2,000 E.O.C. — Senior Health Screening 4,000 E.O.C. - Teen Parenting Program 3,500 Literacy Council—Atascadero Program 2,500 Community Services Foundation—Youth Activity Scholarship Fund 7,500 UCP of San Luis Obispo Count —Supportive Childcare 2,000 Planning and Capacity Building Cuesta College— Small Business Development Center 3,000 City of Atascadero—Code Enforcement 60,000 Administration City Program Administration Costs—Maximum 20% 48,453 Total 2002 CDBG Grant Funds Available $242,266 DISCUSSION: Background: Preparation of the 2002 CDBG Consolidated Plan began in the fall of 2001. Workshops were held throughout the County to solicit public comment on community needs. • The County published a request for CDBG and HOME Investment Partnership Act (HOME) proposals. The City received 19 applications for CDBG funds (no requests for HOME funds were received) totaling $423,172. The City has an estimated $242,266 in CDBG funds available. 092 ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 02/26/2002 CDBG funds are available for community development activities, which meet at least one of the three national objectives: • 1. A benefit to low and moderate income persons; 2. Aid in the prevention or elimination of blight; 3. Address urgent needs that pose a serious and immediate threat to the health or welfare of the community. In order for a program to qualify under the low and moderate income objective, at least 51% of the persons benefiting from the project or program must earn no more than 80% of the area median. Additionally, at least 70% of the CDBG funds must be spent toward this objective. The following criteria should also be used to guide selection of CDBG programs: 1. The proposal is consistent with the national objectives and eligibility criteria of the HUD CDBG program; 2. The proposal is consistent with the Urban County Consolidated Plan; 3. The proposal is consistent with the General Plan and other City codes/ordinances. 4. The proposal will achieve multiple community development objectives; 5. The proposal can be implemented in a timely manner, without significant environmental, policy, procedural, legal, or fiscal obstacles to overcome; and 6. The project is not financially feasible without CDBG funding. Summary • The following is a summary of each application received: Recommended for Funding: North County Women's Resource Center—Kitchen Cabinets Funds Requested: $6,000 Recommended Funding: $6,000 North County Women's Resource Center provides assistance to women and children who are victims of domestic violence. Approximately 95% of their clients meet the low to very low- income criteria. The shelter is currently using old cabinets and bookshelves to store food. Loaves and Fishes—New Roof Funds Requested: $11,260 Recommended Funding: $11,260 Loaves and Fishes operate at 5411 El Camino Real. The building has a flat roof that is leaking and has been temporarily repaired. These funds would be used to provide a new roof. Loaves and Fishes serve over 12,000 clients annually; all qualify under the low and very low-income requirements. • 093 ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 02/26/2002 City of Atascadero—Infrastructure Improvements—Low Income Area • Requested Funding: $100,000 Recommended Funding: $77,233 This area is located in a geographic area that is predominantly low and moderate income. An area-wide project to correct and improve drainage would safeguard homeowners from flooding as well as protect property values from falling El Camino Homeless Organization—Manager/Vouchers Requested Funding: $11,820 Recommended Funding: $14,820 ECHO operates a facility to provide meals for homeless individuals. They provide space for clients to meet with counselors, housing specialists, medical personnel and volunteers. $8,820 is allocated for funding a Crisis Intervention Manager, the remaining $6,000 will be used for motel vouchers. Economic Opportunity Commission—Forty Wonderful Program Requested Funding: $2,000 Recommended Funding: $2,000 E.O.C. is requesting funding from all agencies for the "Forty Wonderful Program" which is designed to improve access to medical services, early detection and intervention of chronic • diseases and reduce mortality for low-income women age 40 and older. Economic Opportunity Commission—Senior Health Screening Requested Funding: $2,000 Recommended Funding: $2,000 E.O.C. is also requesting funds from all agencies to support the Senior Health Screening program. Funds would cover testing and expenses. Economic Opportunity Commission—Teen Parenting Program Requested Funding: $3,600 Recommended Funding: $3,500 The Teen Parenting Program ensures that pregnant and parenting teens receive health and education support. Literacy Council—Atascadero Program . Requested Funding: $2,500 Recommended Funding: $2,500 • This organization is requesting funds to recruit and prepare volunteers as tutors. Client information will be collected to ensure compliance with income 094 ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 02/26/2002 Atascadero Community Services Foundation—Youth Activity Scholarship Fund Requested Funding: $7,500 • Recommended Funding: $7,500 The Community Services Foundation has established a scholarship fund to assist families of low- income youth to participate in recreational and social activities. Because this program is limited to low income youth, the benefit criteria will be met. UCP of San Luis Obispo County—Supportive Childcare Requested Funding: $2,000 Recommended Funding: $2,000 UCP of San Luis Obispo County is requesting funds to assist families with children with disabilities participate in after-school recreation and summer camp programs. The funds will be used to pay all or part of program tuition based on a sliding scale. Cuesta College—Small Business Development Center Requested Funding: $3,000 Recommended Funding: $3,000 Funds are requested to provide business consulting for existing and start-up businesses for low to middle income residents and business owners in San Luis Obispo County. City of Atascadero— Code Enforcement • Requested Funding: $60,000 Recommended Funding: $60,000 This program would provide code enforcement services for low income and deteriorated areas where addressing the violations could be expected to arrest the decline of the area. Not Recommended for Funding this Year Economic Opportunity Commission—Home Repair Program Requested Funding: $25,000 Recommended Funding: 0 This program provides needed home repairs for lower income families, seniors and disabled individuals. These repairs include the removal of architectural barriers, roof repairs, plumbing repairs, etc. E.O.C. currently has over $50,000 available for this program from previous year's awards. Due to HUD requirements that funds be spent in a timely manner, staff is not recommending funding during this cycle. • 095 ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 02/26/2002 • Homeless Housing Project—Motel Voucher Program Funding Requested: $24,000 Funding Recommended: 0 The Homeless Housing Project is requesting funds to provide motel vouchers to the homeless population. Staff is recommending awarding funds for this service to the El Camino Homeless Organization to be distributed in conjunction with their church shelter program. El Camino Homeless Organization—Property Acquisition Funding Requested: $60,000 Funding_Recommended: 0 E.C.H.O. is requesting funds to purchase property to establish a Homeless Day Center. The funds would be used as a down payment and renovation costs. If suitable property could not be located, the organization plans to purchase vacant property and build a facility. Funding is not recommended at this time. This project does not meet the recommended criteria as it cannot expect to be ". . implemented in a timely manner, without significant environmental, policy, procedural, legal or fiscal obstacles to overcome. . . ". City of Atascadero—Transit Dispatch Software/Training Funding Requested: $25,000 . Funding_Recommended: 0 Funds were requested to purchase software to improve the dispatching of the Dial-A-Ride system. Staff is not recommending award at this time due to the limited Public Services funds and the potential for other funding sources. Lifesteps-Salary for Aide Funding Requested: $16,708 Funding Recommended: 0 The applicant is planning to open an Adult Day Health Care Center. This request is to provide funds to hire an Aide. Ultimately Lifesteps anticipates being fully funded through the Medical program. City of Atascadero—Youth Center Elevator Funding Requested: $65,000 Funding Recommended: 0 Funding was requested for installation of an elevator at the new Youth Center. This improvement will be required upon construction of a second floor. This project does not meet the recommended criteria as it cannot expect to be ". . implemented in • a timely manner, without significant environmental, policy, procedural, legal or fiscal obstacles to overcome. . . ". 096 ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 02/26/2002 Big Brothers/Big Sisters—Mentoring Program Funding Requested: $16,551 • Funding Recommended: 0 This organization is requesting funding to be used for Empowerment Training for at-risk children and their guardians and for volunteer training for Big Brothers and Big Sisters. FISCAL IMPACT: Available funds are estimated at $242,266 for the 2002 cycle. ALTERNATIVES: Council may modify the grant recommendations made by Staff. However, awards must meet program requirements, providing a minimum of 70% of funding for benefit to low and moderate income persons, and no more than 15%can be allocated to public service items. • • 097 ITEM NUMBER: C-3 _ DATE: 02/26/2002 1918 i 1976 Atascadero City Council Staff Report—Public Works Department National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Phase II RECOMMENDATIONS: Council: 1. Receive this report on Phase II of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System. 2. Direct Staff to begin development of stormwater ordinance and measures to fulfill the requirements of the Environmental Protection Agency's Storm Water Phase Il. 3. Direct Staff on a specific funding option for the program. • REPORT-IN-BRIEF: In March 2003, the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Storm Water Phase II of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program will extend coverage to "small" municipalities. This program is a result of the Clean Water Act, which was enacted in the 1970's to regulate the discharge of pollutants to waters of the United States. The EPA's Storm Water Phase II Rule establishes a storm water management program that is intended to improve the Nation's waterways by reducing the quantity of pollutants that storm water picks up and carries into storm sewer systems during storm events. Common pollutants include silts, oil and grease from roadways, pesticides from lawns, sediment from construction sites, and carelessly discarded trash, such as cigarette butts, paper wrappers, and plastic bottles. When deposited into nearby waterways, these pollutants can impair the waterways, thereby discouraging recreational use of the resource, contaminating drinking water supplies, and interfering with the habitat for fish, other aquatic organisms, and wildlife. Atascadero will most likely be included in the requirements of the Storm Water Phase II Rule. This will require the City to obtain a National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit from the Regional Water Quality Control Board. Under the permit, the City will be required to develop and implement a storm water management program that: • • Reduces the discharge of pollutants to the "maximum extent practicable" • Protects water quality; and • Satisfies the appropriate water quality requirements of the Clean Water Act. 098 ITEM NUMBER: C-3 DATE: 02/26/2002 The Phase II Rule defines a storm water management program as a program composed of six • elements that, when implemented together, are expected to reduce pollutants discharged into receiving waterbodies to the maximum extent practicable. These six program elements, or minimum control measures, are: • Public Education and Outreach on Storm Water Impacts; • Public Involvement/Participation; • Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination; • Construction Site Runoff Control; • Post-Construction Storm Water Management in New Development and Redevelopment; • Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping for Municipal Operations. The City must select and implement best management practices and measurable goals for each minimum control measure, that comprehensively address the specific storm water problems in this area. The City must fill out a Notice of Intent, which includes all of the measures that the City will implement to apply for coverage under a general permit. The Notice of Intent must be submitted by March 10, 2003. Federal fines could be assessed for noncompliance. DISCUSSION: • Back rg ound: OVERVIEW OF STORM WATER PHASE II PROGRAM Water quality degradation is regulated nationally by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (also called the Clean Water Act [CWA]), which since 1972 regulates the discharge of pollutants to waters of the United States from any point source. In 1987 amendments to the CWA added section 402(p) which established a framework for regulating non-point source storm water discharges under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES) Program (Phase 1). The Phase I NPDES Storm Water Program regulates storm water discharges from major industrial facilities, large and medium-sized municipal separate storm sewer systems, and construction sites that disturb 5 or more acres of land. In October 1999 the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) finalized revisions to the Water Pollution Control Program, implementing the Storm Water Program Phase II Final Rule regulations. The Phase II Program expands its coverage to include (1) regulated "small" municipal separate storm sewer systems (MS4s); (2) construction activity resulting in disturbance of one to five acres of land; and (3) municipally owned industrial facilities. As defined by EPA, a small MS4 is any MS4 not already covered by the Phase I Storm Water Program. A "regulated" small MS4 is one located within the boundaries of a Bureau of Census defined urbanized area. An "urbanized area" is a land area that has a residential population of at . least 50,000 and an overall population density of at least 1,000 people per square mile, or areas as identified by the Regional Water Quality Control Boards. The Central Coast Regional Water 099 ITEM NUMBER: C-3 DATE: 02/26/2002 Quality Control Board has indicated that they will also include areas with a population of more than 10,000 and a population density of greater than 1,000 per square mile. The Regional Board will set the boundaries of the MS4 and Regional Board Staff has said Atascadero will likely be included in the boundaries. The program is aimed at "urbanized areas". Staff is recommending that the control measures be aimed at the portion of the City inside the urban reserve line. Storm Water Phase II Program Goal and Objectives As declared by the EPA, the goal of the Storm Water Program is (1) to protect the water quality of the Nation's waterways by reducing the quantity of pollutants that storm water picks up and carries into storm sewer systems and natural surface drainage ways (such as creeks, lakes, and estuaries) during storm events to the "maximum extent practicable," and (2) to satisfy the appropriate requirements of the Clean Water Act. The Phase II Program requires small MS4s to develop, implement, and enforce a storm water management program that includes six minimum control measures to meet this goal 1. Public education and outreach 2. Public participation/involvement 3. Illicit discharge detection and elimination 4. Construction site runoff control 5. Post-construction runoff control • 6. Pollution prevention/good housekeeping for municipal operations The Program must include specific Best Management Practices (BMP) for each of the above six minimum control measures and must define measurable goals. Best Management Practices for storm water management are defined as schedules of activities, prohibitions of practices, maintenance procedures, the use of pollution control devices and other management practices used to prevent or reduce the amount of pollution introduced to receiving bodies of storm water runoff. The "maximum extent practicable" standard requires the development and implementation of BMPs and the achievement of measurable goals to satisfy each of the six minimum control measures. Determining whether a BMP protects water quality to the maximum extent practicable is subjective. However, there have been many BMPs approved for other Phase I municipalities, as well as a number of Phase II communities which can be implemented in the City of Atascadero. The "measurable goals" should reflect the specific needs and characteristics of the City according to EPA guidelines. According to the Program guidelines, the measurable goals do not necessarily have to be quantitative, but should be attainable and controllable. Guidance on development of measurable goals was to be provided by EPA by October 2001. However, the City has not received any information at this time. • Although most Phase I Programs included extensive water quality monitoring to gauge progress in improving storm water quality, this aspect is not required by the EPA for Phase II 100 ITEM NUMBER: C-3 DATE: 02/26/2002 communities. None-the-less some water quality monitoring is recommended to define the nature • and extent ofroblems and to assess the benefits of local Program activities. p � g Milestones and Implementation Schedule Important milestones for the development of the Storm Water Program are presented below: December 8, 2002: NPDES permitting authorities are required to issue general permits of Phase II regulated small MS4s. March 10, 2003: Operators of small MS4s are required to submit Notice of Intent to initiate NPDES Phase II permitting coverage. NPDES PERMIT REQUIREMENTS Notice of Intent The City must fill out a Notice of Intent (NOI) application form to apply for coverage under a general permit. The application form must include the following information: • Best management practices (BMPs) for each of the six minimum control measures; • Measurable goals for each of the BMPs (i.e., narrative or numeric standards used to gauge program effectiveness); • A timeline for implementation of each measure (estimate months and years to implement each measure, including interim milestones and frequency); and • Specify the individual(s) or group(s) responsible for implementing or coordinating the storm water program. Reporting Once the permit application has been submitted and permit coverage is obtained, the City must satisfy the conditions of the permit and submit periodic reports on the status and effectiveness of the program at reducing pollutants to the "maximum extent practicable" (MEP). Permit Violations Early indications from the Regional Water Quality Control Board show that fines up to $10,000/day per incident will be issued for noncompliance with the conditions of the NPDES permit. These fines will be assessed to the permit holder regardless of whether the violation occurs on public or private property. • 101 ITEM NUMBER: C-3 DATE: 02/26/2002 • FISCAL IMPACT: The following information is the estimated annual cost of implementing NPDES. Estimated Costs of Implementation of Phase II Stormwater Regulations Control Measure Activities Material Costs Labor Total Cost Public Education& • Brochures,magnets, $15,000 60 hours @ $17,400 Outreach posters,coloring books. $40/hour= •Radio Ad/TV Ad $2,400 •Bus Ad •Business Outreach Public Participation& • Storm Drain Stenciling $2,000 Involvement •Community Cleanup Stormwater Ordinance . Write draft ordinance $0 70 hours @ $2,800 •Get management S40/hour= approval $2,800 • Send to governing body for approval Illicit Discharge • Develop program $2,000 60 hours @ $4,400 Detection& • Develop map $40/hour= Elimination .Determine sources of $2,400 illicit discharges (1 hour to check • •Correct discharges each manhole or outfall) Pollution •Update SWPPP $500 50 hours @ $49,000 Prevention/Good .Give BMP training to $40/hour= Housekeeping agency staff $2,000 • Begin regular street $46,500/yr sweeping program Street Sweeping Construction Site •Educate local $1,000 50 hours @ $3,000 Runoff Control developers&construction $40/hour= firms $2,000 •Train agency planners& inspectors Post-construction • Educate local $1,000 40 hours @ $2,600 Runoff Control developers&construction $40/hour= firms $1,600 • Train agency planners& inspectors Permitting& • Develop good record $0 20 hours @ $800 Reporting keeping procedures $40/hour=$800 Requirements Total Program Costs $21,500 350 hours @ $82,000 $40/hour= $14,000+ $46,500.00 • These costs are estimates. Many of the costs will be less after the first year when the program is set up. The Staff time costs of $14,000.00 are included to demonstrate the impact this program will have on staff. 350 hours are approximately 2 months of one person's time. - 102 ITEM NUMBER: C-3 DATE: 02/26/2002 FUNDING OPTIONS • The requirements of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System program are not funded by State or Federal programs. Therefore, cities and counties throughout the nation will bare this financial burden. Staff will look for funding opportunities with partnerships with other agencies. The partnerships could be used to spread the cost of certain programs over several agencies. The development of brochures, radio ads, etc. could be shared. Staff will be looking for grants and other state and federal funding to help defray the costs. The following are options for funding this program: 1. Allocate funds in the budget to this program. This will have a large impact on the budget and the staff. Almost no discretionary funds are left _ in the budget and staff levels are low. Staff would have to take a close look at the budget to determine where the funds would come from and who in the existing staff would be responsible for what part of the program. A fee could be added to the building permit to cover the construction site runoff control portion of the program. If this option were chosen staff would come back to Council with specific recommendations. 2. Create a storm water utility. • A fee would be assessed to all residential, commercial, and industrial properties, based on the average stormwater runoff per square foot of property. The fees would be included on tax bills as a stormwater utility fee. The implementation of this program will be subject to the requirements of Proposition 218. The City of San Luis Obispo and many other Cities have or are looking at creating a stormwater utility. The City of Santa Barbara is using an increase in the bed tax for funding. Many of the small cities are still trying to figure out funding and the program. The process would be similar to setting up a road assessment district. Implementation of a stormwater utility in the City of Atascadero would require a comprehensive analysis of the stormwater runoff to create a zone of benefit. An Engineers Report and a protest vote would be required. A consultant should be retained to develop a stormwater utility. If this option were chosen staff would come back to Council with proposals from consultants and recommendations on funding of their services. ATTACHMENTS: Draft Storm Water Management Program • 103 • City of Atascadero Storm Water Management Program Per National Pollution Discharge Elimination System Phase II Requirements February 2002 • • 1G4 The following sections will discuss the six minimum measures for National Pollution Discharge Elimination System, Phase II for the City of Atascadero • PUBLIC EDUCATION AND OUTREACH Public Education and Outreach is the first control measure of the Program. Goals and Requirements The goals of the Education and Outreach component of the Storm Water Program are to: • Raise public awareness about urban runoff pollution and its impacts on the community's water resources; and • Educate the community about specific pollutant sources and what individuals can do to reduce urban runoff pollution. To meet these goals, the requirements of the education/outreach component of the Storm Water Program are to: • Implement a public education program which distributes education materials and conducts outreach activities aimed at informing the public about the impacts of storm water discharges on local water bodies, and receiving waters; and • Implement appropriate BMPs and set measurable goals .in order to assess the success of the public education and outreach program. Recommended Education/Outreach Activities, Policies, and Procedures . A. Provide a wide variety of educational information on non-point source pollution and urban waterways management: 1. Informational brochures, posters, and fact sheets 2. Newspaper, billboard, and radio advertisements 3. Creek Care Guide 4. Web site 5. Educational exhibits B. Present workshops: 1. General forum on water resources in Atascadero 2. Industry-specific workshops/presentations, for food service industry, automotive repair and wrecking, construction/contractors, landscapers, municipal workers. 3. Schools, science fairs. C. Provide education and assistance to homeowners: 1. Creek care (bank stabilization and dumping) 2. Landscaping and water quality protection (use of fertilizers and pesticides) 3. Home repair/maintenance and water quality protection (use and disposal of paints, solvents, and other household chemicals) PUBLIC PARTICIPATION/INVOLVEMENT Public Participation/Involvement is the second control measure of the Program. • 10� • Goals and Requirements The goals of the public participation/outreach program are to: • Raise public awareness about urban runoff pollution, and • Involve the public in developing and implementing the Storm Water Program in order to promote public interest and support. To meet these goals, the MS4 is required to: • Comply with all State, and local public notice requirements, and • Implement appropriate BMPs and develop achievable and controllable measurable goals aimed at involving the public in the Storm Water Program. Recommended Public Participation/Involvement Activities, Policies, and Procedures A. Develop a formal mechanism to solicit public participation/input on Storm Water Program. B. Provide opportunities for public participation in Storm Water Program and activities to protect urban water quality: 1. Volunteer water quality monitoring 2. Volunteer storm drain stenciling and maintenance 3. Volunteer creek clean-up 4. Creek walks C. Present workshops: 1. General forum on water resources in Atascadero • 2. Industry-specific workshops/presentations, for food service industry, automotive repair and wrecking, construction/contractors, landscapers, municipal workers. 3. Schools, science fairs. ILLICIT DISCHARGE DETECTION AND ELIMINATION Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination is the third control measure of the Program. An illicit discharge is any discharge to a MS4 that is not composed entirely of storm water. Illicit discharges enter the storm drainage system through either (1) direct connections (mistaken or deliberate connections to storm drains), or (2) indirect connections, e.g., filtering into storm drains from cracked wastewater pipes, spills draining into storm drains, or waste waters or materials deliberately dumped into storm drains. It is important to note that an illicit discharge does not only include direct dumping into a storm drain, but may occur at a considerable distance from a storm drain. For instance, an oil leak in a driveway can be washed into the storm drainage system during a storm runoff event, and could be considered an illicit discharge. Goals and Requirements The goals of the illicit discharge detection and elimination program are to: • Control illicit discharges by conducting methodological field surveys/investigations of the storm drainage system and eliminating improper connections and discharges. • Prevent improper disposal of wastes through public education and providing • appropriate waste material disposal options and incentives. 10 • Contain and cleanup accidental spills using proper cleanup and disposal materials and • methods. The requirements for the illicit discharge and detection program, as set forth in the Final Rule, include: • Developing a storm water system map that shows the location of all outfalls and the names and locations of all waters of the U.S. that receive discharges from the outfalls. • Developing an enforceable means to prohibit non-storm water discharges - i.e. an ordinance or other regulatory mechanism. • Developing a municipality-wide plan to detect and address non-storm water discharges. • Educating the general public, businesses, and public employees about the hazards (and legal consequences) of illicit discharge. • Determine appropriate BMPs and measurable goals to meet these requirements. Recommended Activities for Illicit Discharge Program A. Prepare storm system map. B. Develop ordinance prohibiting illicit discharges. C. Conduct field survey/ site inspections to identify illicit discharges. D. Develop enforcement procedures (in addition to ordinance). CONSTRUCTION SITE RUNOFF CONTROL Construction Site Runoff Control is the fourth control measure of the Program. • Goals and Requirements The goal of the construction site runoff control program is to: • Develop, implement, and enforce a program to reduce the amount of pollutants in storm water runoff from construction activities that result in land disturbance of greater than or equal to one acre. The requirements of the construction site runoff control program include: • Developing an ordinance, or other regulatory mechanism, requiring the implementation of proper erosion and sediment controls on construction sites. • Developing procedures for site plan review of construction plans to address water quality protection measures. • Developing procedures for site inspections and enforcement of control measures. • Establishing procedures for receiving information/concerns about construction site practices from the public. • Develop appropriate BMPs and measurable goals to meet these requirements. Recommended Activities for Construction Site Runoff Control Program The Construction Site Runoff Control Program is primarily geared toward private sector construction activities, although Public Works projects are included. The Construction Site Runoff Control Program will be the responsibility of the Public Works and Community Development Department. • 10 � The recommended activities for the Construction Site Runoff Control Program are as • follows: A. Develop an ordinance specifically addressing construction site erosion and sediment control. B. Develop procedures to ensure adequate review of site plans to address erosion and sediment control on all sites greater than one acre. C. Develop procedures to conduct construction site inspections to ensure appropriate erosion and sediment control measures are in place on all sites. D. Provide informational brochures and fact sheets on construction site erosion control and recommended BMPs. POST-CONSTRUCTION RUNOFF CONTROL Post-Construction Runoff Control is the fifth control measure of the Program. Goals and Requirements Post construction run-off control includes such activities as storm drainage system maintenance, street sweeping, and maintenance/cleaning of oil water separators and filter systems. The goal of the post-construction runoff control program is to: • Reduce the potential for discharge of pollutants into urban runoff from new development and redevelopment. • The requirements for the post-construction runoff control program, as set forth in the Final Rule, include: • Developing an ordinance, or other regulatory framework, requiring the implementation of post-construction runoff controls. • Developing appropriate structural and non-structural BMP strategies to address post- construction runoff. • Ensuring adequate long-term operation and maintenance of controls. • Determine appropriate BMPs and measurable goals to meet these requirements. Recommended Activities for Post-Construction Runoff Control Program A. Develop an ordinance specifically addressing construction site erosion and sediment control. B. Develop City procedures to ensure adequate post-construction controls are implemented and maintained. C. Provide informational brochures and fact sheets on post-construction water quality controls. 108 MUNICIPAL OPERATIONS -POLLUTION PREVENTION Municipal Operations - Pollution Prevention is the sixth control measure of the Program. • Goals and Requirements This measure is specifically aimed at the operations and maintenance procedures to be implemented by the City on municipal projects. The goal of the municipal operations pollution prevention measures is to • Reduce the amount and type of pollutants that collects on streets,,,parking lots, material storage and vehicle maintenance yards, and are discharged into the storm drainage system. • Reduce the release of pollutants that result from actions such as environmentally damaging land development and flood management practices or poor maintenance of storm drainage systems. The particular requirements of the pollution prevention/good housekeeping measure include: • Developing and implementing an operation and maintenance program for the MS4 to prevent or reduce polluted runoff from municipal operations. • Provide employee training on how to incorporate pollution prevention and good housekeeping into all municipal operations such as park.and open space maintenance, fleet and building maintenance, road maintenance, storm drain maintenance, and urban creek "maintenance". • Determining appropriate BMPs and measurable goals to meet these requirements. , Recommended Activities for Municipal Operations Program A. Develop a Municipal Operations BMP Manual. B. Develop a Storm Drainage Maintenance Program. C. Provide necessary training for municipal staff to adequately and appropriately carry out the policies and procedures defined in the Municipal Operations BMP Manual and Storm Drainage Maintenance Program. D. Develop a Street Sweeping Program. It is proposed that all City maintained local streets within the Urban Services Line are swept once per month, and arterials and collectors are swept once a week. The total lane miles for this work are approximately 310 miles per month. Street sweeping would have an estimated cost of $46,500 per year at $12.50 per lane mile. The estimated cost per lane mile was taken from the current City of Paso Robles sweeping contract • 109