Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda Packet 12/11/2001
n. AGENDA '• 1$ , ISMS ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY, DECEMBER 11, 2001 7:00 P.M. City of Atascadero 6500 Palma Avenue, 4th Floor Atascadero, California REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: 6:30 P.M. CLOSED SESSION: 1. PUBLIC COMMENT - CLOSED SESSION 2. Call to Order a.) Conference with legal counsel - Pending litigation(Govt. Code Sec. 54956.9) Diamond v City of Atascadero 3. Adjourn 4. CLOSED SESSION REPORT REGULAR SESSION, 7:00 P.M.: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Council Member Luna ROLL CALL: Mayor Arrambide Mayor Pro Tem Scalise Council Member Clay Council Member Johnson Council Member Luna APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Roll Call CITY COUNCIL REORGANIZATION: 1. Council Appointment of Mayor—The City Clerk will accept nominations from the Council Members 2. Council Appointment of Mayor Pro Tem—The new Mayor will accept nominations from the Council Members 3. Review committee appointments COMMUNITY FORUM: (This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wanting to address the Council on any matter not on this agenda and over which the Council has jurisdiction. Speakers are limited to five minutes. Please state your name and address for the record before making your presentation. The Council may take action to direct the staff to place a matter of business on a future agenda.) COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS: (On their own initiative, Council Members may make a brief announcement or a brief report on their own activities. Council Members may ask a question for clarification, make a referral to • staff or take action to have staff place a matter of business on a future agenda. The Council may take action on items listed on the Agenda.) A. CONSENT CALENDAR: Roll Call (All items on the consent calendar are considered to be routine and non-controversial by City staff and will be approved by one motion if no member of the Council or public wishes to comment or ask questions. If comment or discussion is desired by anyone, the item will be removed from the consent calendar and will be considered in the listed sequence with an opportunity for any member of the public to address the Council concerning the item before action is taken.) 1. City Council Minutes—November 27, 2001 ■ City Clerk recommendation: Council approve the City Council minutes of November 27, 2001. [City Clerk] 2. City Treasurer's Agenda Report- October 2001 City Treasurer recommendation Council review and accept the October 2001 Treasurer's Report. [City Treasurer] 3. October 2001 - Accounts Payable and Payroll ■ Fiscal Impact: S909,231.21 • ■ Staff recommendation: Council approve certified City accounts payable, payroll and payroll vendor checks for October 2001. [Administrative Services] 2 4. City Council 2002 Meeting Schedule ■ Fiscal Impact: None ■ Staff recommendation: Council approve City Council meeting schedule for 2002. [City Manager] 5. Improvements to Paloma Creek Park Memorial Field- Request by Atascadero Little League ■ Fiscal Impact: None ■ Staff recommendation: Council: 1. Approve request by Atascadero Little League to make the following improvements to Memorial Field at Paloma Creek Park: a. Install a section of chain link fence to create a Pitchers warm-up area b. Install backstop pole extensions C. Remove the infield turf 2. Temporarily delay a request by Atascadero Little League to make the following improvements to Memorial Field at Paloma Creek Park: a. Build a full-sized batting cage beyond the right field fence. b. Install lights for night baseball 3. Direct staff to work with Atascadero Little League on the development of a long- range Master Plan for Paloma Creek Park that considers future desires for improvements to Memorial Field by Atascadero Little League. [Community Services] 6. Memorial Tree in Atascadero Lake Park- Request by the Atascadero Mom's Club ■ Fiscal Impact: None ■ Staff recommendation: Council approve the request by the Atascadero Mom's Club to plant a Memorial Tree at Atascadero Lake Park. [Community Services] 7. 2002 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) SR 41/US 101 Interchange Match ■ Fiscal Impact: $423,000.00from Street and Bridge Impact Fee Fund ■ Staff recommendation: Council approve the allocation of$423,000.00 of Street and Bridge Impact Fee Funds as a match for the State Route 41/US 101 Interchange Replacement Project and authorize staff to enter into a cooperative agreement with San Luis Obispo Council of Governments (SLOCOG) to formalize the allocation. [Public Works] 3 B. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. Lot Line Adjustment #2001-0033 - (City of Atascadero / Kelly Gearhart) 5599 Traffic Way & 5501 Traffic Way ■ Fiscal Impact: None ■ Staff recommendation: Council: 1. Adopt the draft Resolution "A" approving the acceptance of 2,500 +/ square feet of property proposed to be exchanged in Lot Line Adjustment 2001-0033, consistent with the Planning Commission's finding that the exchange of City property involved in LLA 2001-0033 is consistent with the City's General Plan as required by California Government Code Section 65402; and 2. Adopt the draft Resolution `B" approving Lot Line Adjustment 2001-0033, based on appropriate findings and subject to conditions of approval. [Community Development] 2. Single Family Planned Development - Zone Change 2001-0014, Master Plan of Development (CUP 2001-0048), Tentative Tract Map 2001-0007 6555 Atascadero Avenue (Shores) ■ Fiscal Impact: The project would likely have a slight negative impact on City revenues. As a general rule, single-family dwellings require services that exceed the revenue generated by the dwelling. ■ Planning Commission Recommendations: Council: 1. Adopt Resolution "A", certifying Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration 2001- 0044; and, . 2. Introduce for first reading by title only, a draft ordinance, allowing Zone Change 2001-0014 based on findings; and, 3. Adopt Resolution `B", approving Master Plan of Development (CUP 2001-0048) based on findings and subject to Conditions of Approval and Mitigation Monitoring; and, 4. Adopt Resolution "C approving Vesting Tentative Tract Map 2001-0007, based on findings and subject to Conditions of Approval and Mitigation Monitoring. [Community Development] C. MANAGEMENT REPORTS: 1. Modification to El Camino Homeless Organization(ECHO) 2001 CDBG Award ■ Fiscal Impact: None ■ Staff recommendation: Council review the proposed changes in the scope of the award and direct staff to prepare a contract reflecting ECHO's amended scope of services. [City Manager] 4 2. Off-Sale Beer and Wine Sales License Determination- 6305 Morro Road- Giessinger • Convenience Store and Gas Station ■ Fiscal Impact: None ■ Staff recommendation: Council determine that the issuance of a beer and wine sales license for off-site consumption will serve a public convenience at 6305 Morro Road. [Community Development] D. COMMITTEE REPORTS: (The following represent standing committees. Informative status reports will be given, as felt necessary.): Mayor Arrambide 1. S.L.O. Council of Governments(SLOCOG)/S.L.O. Regional Transit Authority(SLORTA) 2. Water Committees 3. County Mayor's Round Table Mayor Pro Tem Scalise 1. Finance Committee 2. City/ Schools Committee 3. Economic Opportunity Commission(EOC) 4. Atascadero State Hospital Advisory Board 5. Economic Vitality Corporation, Board of Directors (EVC) Council Member Luna 1. Finance Committee 2. Integrated Waste Management Authority (IWMA) 3. North County Homeless Coalition Council Member Johnson 1. Local Agency Formation Commissions (LAFCO) Council Member Clay 1. Air Pollution Control District(APCD) 2. City/ Schools Committee E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION: 1. City Council 2. City Clerk 3. City Treasurer 4. City Attorney 5. City Manager • 5 F. ADJOURNMENT: • Please note: Should anyone challenge any proposed development entitlement listed on this Agenda in court, that person may be limited to raising those issues addressed at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at or prior to this public hearing. I, Marcia McClure Torgerson, the City Clerk of the City of Atascadero, declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing agenda for the December 11, 2001 Regular Session of the Atascadero City Council was posted on December 4, 2001 at Atascadero City Hall, 6500 Palma Ave., Atascadero, CA 93422 and was available for public review in the City Clerk's office at that location. Signed this 4h of December, 2001 at Atascadero, California. Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Cler City of Atascadero 6 City of Atascadero WELCOME TO THE A TA SCADER 0 CITY COUNCIL MEETING The City Council meets in regular session on the second and fourth Tuesday of each month at 7:00 p.m., in the Council Chamber of City Hall. Matters are considered by the Council in the order of the printed Agenda. Copies of the staff reports or other documentation relating to each item of business referred to on the Agenda are on file in the office of the City Clerk(Room 311)available for public inspection during City Hall business hours. An agenda packet is also available for public review at the Atascadero Library, 6850 Morro Road. Contracts, Resolutions and Ordinances will be allocated a number once they are approved by the City Council. The minutes of this meeting will reflect these numbers. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in a City meeting or other services offered by this City, please contact the City Manager's Office, (805) 461-5010, or the City Clerk's Office, (805)461-5074. Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time when services are needed will assist the City staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting or service. TO SPEAK ON AGENDA ITEMS Members of the audience may speak on any item on the agenda. The Mayor will identify the subject, staff will give their report, and the Council will ask questions of staff. The Mayor will announce when the public comment period is open and will request anyone interested to address the Council regarding the matter being considered to step up to the podium. If you wish to speak for, against or comment in any way: • • You must approach the podium and be recognized by the Mayor • Give your name and address(not required) • Make your statement • All comments should be made to the Mayor and Council • All comments limited to 5 minutes(unless changed by the Council) • No one may speak for a second time until everyone wishing to speak has had an opportunity to do so, and no one may speak more than twice on any item. The Mayor will announce when the public comment period is closed, and thereafter, no further public comments will be heard by the Council. TO SPEAK ON SUBJECTS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA Under Agenda item, "COMMUNITY FORUM", the Mayor will call for anyone from the audience having business with the Council to: • Please approach the podium and be recognized • Give your name and address • State the nature of your business This is the time items not on the Agenda may be brought to the Council's attention. A maximum of 30 minutes will be allowed for Community Forum (unless changed by the Council). TO HAVE ITEMS PLACED ON AGENDA All business matters to appear on the Agenda must be in the Office of the City Manager ten days preceding the Council meeting. Should you have a matter you wish to bring before the Council, please mail or bring a written communication to the City Manager's office in City Hall prior to the deadline. ITEM NUMBER: A- 1 DATE: 12/11/2001 DRAFT MINUTES �-{19a 979 ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 27, 2001 7:00 P.M. REGULAR SESSION, 7:00 P.M.: Mayor Arrambide called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. and Council Member Johnson led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL: • Present: Council Members Clay, Johnson, Luna, Scalise and Mayor Arrambide Absent: None Others Present: City Clerk Marcia McClure Torgerson and City Treasurer David Graham Staff Present: City Manager Wade McKinney, Assistant City Manager Brady Cherry, Administrative Services Director Rachelle Rickard, Community Development Director Warren Frace, City Engineer Steve Kahn, Deputy Community Services Director Geoff English, Public Works Technician Valerie Humphrey, Fire Captain Fred Motlo, Police Lt. John Couch and City Attorney Roy Hanley. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Mayor Arrambide suggested moving Item #C-5 to #C-1. City Manager McKinney requested Item#C-4 be pulled from the Agenda. MOTION: By Council Member Luna and seconded by Council Member Clay to approve the Agenda as amended. • Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. CC 11/27/01 Pagel 001 COMMUNITY FORUM: Eric Greening, 7365 Valle, gave the Council an update on the Union Asphalt issue. A second appeal has since been filed by a group of concerned citizens in the area of the mine. It is presumed that the County Board of Supervisors will hear this appeal as well as the one by the City of Paso Robles concurrently in late January/early February. Issues to be raised by both appellants could be settled to their satisfaction increasing the impact on Atascadero. Mr. Greening felt it would be important for Atascadero to support the appeal ensuring that this project has adequate environmental review and to ensure that Atascadero does not get 50 trucks a day through the 41/101 interchange. Pearl Munak, Homeless Housing Project, clarified their CDBG applications to the City. She stated that the County had sent papers, which made it appear that the Homeless Housing Project was asking the City of Atascadero for a homeless shelter and a feasibility study as well as funding for the motel voucher program. However, the Project is only requesting funding for the motel voucher program. Mayor Arrambide closed the Community Forum period COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS: 1. Bow Hunting - Council Member Clay will give a verbal report on the sub- committee meeting concerning bow hunting. The City Council may give • direction to staff regarding this issue. Council Member Clay gave a verbal report summarizing for the Council the information gathered at the sub-committee meeting. He recommended the Council place this issue on their agenda in January 2002. (Attachment A) PUBLIC COMMENT George Zidbeck, 1869 San Fernando Road, National Field Archery Association member, has a range on his property that has been certified as safe by a National Field Archery range inspector. To his knowledge, the Police Department has never received a complaint about arrows being shot on his property. He suggested the Council keep the laws that prohibit trespassing and poaching, however he is concerned that legislative responsive to emotional circumstances such as hunting, will produce over-reaction and laws that are written to severely restrict large groups of people who do not need "big brother manifestos." Mr. Zidbeck offered to be a resource for this issue and gave his phone number for this purpose (466-5757). Corrina Jones, asked the Council to place this issue on their agenda for January 22nd. Steve Grossman, Balboa Road, shared a picture with the Council of a deer with an arrow through its body. He stated that Council Member Clay came to his house to authenticate the negative for • CC Page 2 27/01 002 those who doubted. Mr. Grossman feels that to allow hunting of any type within the city limits is • inappropriate, and that this is not a hunting issue, but rather a safety issue. Daphne Fahsing, mentioned that the Council is considering the closure of West Mall for the safety of the children, even though there haven't been any children injured there. She explained that this issue is similar—prevention of danger to humans. Larry Koznek, 7485 Cortina Street, stated he's a bow hunter and target archer. He urged the Council not to prohibit target archery within the City limits of Atascadero. Council Member Clay asked Mr. Koznek to explain arrow distances for those present. Mr. Koznek stated that if an individual with an average compound bow (the most powerful type of bow) were to stand on a high surface, hold the bow horizontal and let go, the arrow would drop an average of 18 feet within 100 yards. If the bow is held horizontal while standing at ground level, the arrow will hit the ground within a very short distance. Mayor Arrambide closed the Public Comment period There was Council consensus to place Bow Hunting on the January 22"`1 agenda as a public hearing. 2. Vehicle License Fee (VLF) - The City Council asked staff to draft a letter to Governor Davis expressing Atascadero's opposition to any takeaway of VLF • revenue. ■ Staff recommendation: Council authorize the Mayor to sign the draft letter expressing Atascadero's opposition to any takeativay of VLF revenue. [City Manager] City Manager Wade McKinney gave the staff report and answered questions of Council. There was Council consensus for the Mayor to sign the letter, changing the miles listed in the letter to 180, and copy our legislators. Council Member Clay shared with the Council that he participated with Assemblyman Maldonado in a press conference concerning security issues at Atascadero State Hospital and Assembly Bill 1833. Council Member Clay urged the City Council to support Assemblyman Maldonado and AB1833', which would make escapes from Atascadero State Hospital a misdemeanor or a felony depending on how it is seen by the District Attorney. He further urged support for allowing Atascadero State Hospital Police Officers to carry firearms and that the double perimeter fence be completed promptly. Council Member Clay also discussed the disparity in salaries between the Atascadero State Hospital Police Officers and Correctional Officers and the dangers of Hospital staff members becoming involved with patients at the facility. • CC 11/27/01 Page 3 003 A. CONSENT CALENDAR: • 1. City Council Minutes—November 13, 2001 ■ City Clerk recommendation: Council approve the City Council minutes of November 13, 2001. [City Clerk] 2. Shores/Davis Cluster Residential Subdivision - Zone Change 2001-0015 - 3900 Traffic Way (Shores/Tarr) ■ Fiscal Impact: The project would likely have a slight negative impact on City revenues. As a general rule, single-family dwellings require services that exceed the revenue generated by the dwelling. ■ Staff recommendation: Council introduce for second reading by title only, and adopt the draft Ordinance enacting Zone Change 2001-0015, changing the zoning district of a portion of APN 049-033-021 from "L " (Recreation) to "LS " (Special Recreation) thereby making single-family residential a conditionally allowable use. [Community Development] 3. Final Parcel Map 2001-0016 / AT 01-082 - 9900 Santa Lucia Road (Stark / Wilson Land Surveys) ■ Fiscal Impact: None ■ Staff recommendation: Council: 1. Accept Final Parcel Map 2001-0016 (AT 01-082); and, 2. Reject without prejudice, the public utility easement (P.U.E) shown on Final Parcel Map 2001-0016 [Public Works] 4. Final Parcel Map 2001-0014 /AT 01-231 - 6350 Navarette Avenue (Bolton) ■ Fiscal Impact: None ■ Staff recommendation: Council: 1. Accept Final Parcel Map 2001-0014 (AT 01-231); and, 2. Reject without prejudice, the public utility easement (P.U.E) shown on Final Parcel Map 2001-0014 [Public Works] Council Member Luna and Eric Greening requested that Consent Calendar Items #A-1 and 2 be pulled. MOTION: By Council Member Luna and seconded by Council Member Johnson to approve Consent Calendar Items #A-3 and 4. Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. ITEM #A-l: Council Member Luna asked Council to refer to the City Council Minutes of November 13, 2001, page 8, and asked Council Member Clay to clarify whether he disagreed with Council Member Luna or the City Attorney regarding the nexus necessary for this item. Council Member Clay stated that he disagreed with the City Attorney. CC 11/27/01 h Page 4 Eric Greening referred to the Community Forum from the Minutes of November 13, 2001, and • his concerns with the Union Asphalt project. Mr. Greening stated that the reason he was bringing this item to the attention of Council was not concern for the roads in Paso Robles, but concern for the impacts on the Highway 41/101 interchange in Atascadero. He would like a sentence added just before the last sentence in the paragraph, which would state, "Atascadero would experience 50 gravel trucks a day on the 41/101 interchange." MOTION: By Council Member Luna and seconded by Council Member Clay to approve Item#A-1 with the amendments as noted. Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. ITEM #A-2: Council Member Luna felt it would be prudent for Council to continue this item to a date certain to attain an archeological review of the property. Council Member Clay asked Mr. Shores to clarify the background of the spring on this property. Mr. Shores explained when they recorded the first map on Phase I the Water Company had required a blanket easement on the spring area. Council Member Clay suggested the City negotiate with the Water Company to use the spring to irrigate the ball fields and trees. Eric Greening, asked the Council to continue this item until proper archeological studies can be completed. He would like to see all questions regarding cultural resources answered before proceeding with the change. • Mayor Arrambide asked staff to clarify the issue. Community Development Director Frace stated that this item is an amendment to a project previously approved in 1999. There are issues with archeological resources within the Phase II area, which is currently under construction and not subject to this zone change. On the Phase Il area there was a requirement with the original map that there be additional archeological work as part of the CEQA documents prepared. There are archeologists that have been working periodically on the site and there was an issue with the original archeologist being unable to come to terms on a contract to continue the monitoring that is going on right now, so the applicant has retained a new archeologist to do that work. The developer is responsible for retaining an archeologist; the City however, does review those contracts to insure the individual is qualified to do the work. Mr. Frace answered questions of Council. MOTION: By Council Member Johnson and seconded by Council Member Clay to introduce for second reading by title only, and adopt the draft Ordinance enacting Zone Change 2001-0015, changing the zoning district of a portion of APN 049-033-021 from "L " (Recreation) to "LS " (Special Recreation) thereby making single-family residential a conditionally allowable use. Motion passed 4:1 by a roll-call vote. (Luna opposed) (Ordinance #389) • B. PUBLIC HEARINGS: None CC 11/27/01 n Page 5 005 C. MANAGEMENT REPORTS: • 1. Information Bulletin a. El Camino Homeless Organization (ECHO) Assistant City Manager Brady Cherry gave the staff report and answered questions of Council. PUBLIC COMMENT Charlotte Bryne, ECHO, explained to the Council the process they have been following. She stated they have had to go ahead and purchase items needed to open as the cold weather has begun. They realize that until the grant has been approved, they will not be reimbursed for any money they have had to spend. It is hoped that the eventual solution will be a place where people can have a day shelter as well as an overnight in one place. Mrs. Bryne invited Council to come and share a meal; it is not necessary to prove that one is poor or homeless, only hungry. Pearl Munak, Homeless Housing Project, stated they support any organization that helps the homeless. She listed several ways they would be able to help ECHO including a van, sheets, blankets, cots, etc. She asked for assistance from the Council for all the homeless organizations in the community to work together to provide shelter especially during bad weather. (Attachment B) Joan O'Keefe, 9985 Old Morro Road East, stated she is also concerned with how all the organizations will be able to coordinate their services and asked for clarification on several • items. Eric Greening, stressed the urgency to act now. Regarding sheltering in churches, in San Luis Obispo individuals are transported to the churches from a day center with showers, which is important as most churches do not have this type of amenity. If there is not some center here where showers are available, how will cleanliness be provided at the churches particularly for those who are there night after night? Mike Bryne, Loaves & Fishes, stated he is happy that there is an alternative to the motel voucher system. Each voucher they purchase for a client family costs approximately $45 and with the pantry running short, $45 worth of food would be a priority. The number of requests they receive for shelter exceeds by a great deal their ability to meet the need. Regarding the issue of showers, their organization writes vouchers and families go to Champions Fitness Center for the showers. Charlotte Bryne, reiterated that what the north county needs is a permanent homeless shelter. Eric Greening, stated that he hopes the churches in Atascadero would make the same level of commitment to the homeless as those in San Luis Obispo. Mr. Greening gave an explanation of the activities of San Luis Obispo churches in regard to sheltering the homeless. • CC 11/27/01 0 6 Page 6 Pearl Munak, gave additional information on costs for the Homeless Housing Project. From • December through March, the entire program cost $20,546.17, and it was for this reason that she became concerned with this proposal to spend $20,000 on items that her organization could provide for free. Mayor Arrambide closed the Public Comment period There was Council consensus to have this item on their next agenda. 2. Appointment of Youth Representative - Parks and Recreation Commission ■ Fiscal Impact: None ■ Staff recommendation: Council appoint Drew Wardlaw as the Youth Representative to the Parks and Recreation Commission for a one-year term, beginning January 1, 2002. [Community Services] Assistant City Manager Brady Cherry gave the staff report. MOTION: By Mayor Pro Tem Scalise and seconded by Council Member Luna to appoint Drew Wardlaw as the Youth Representative to the Parks and Recreation Commission for a one-year term, beginning January 1, 2002. Motion passed 5:0 by a voice vote. • 3. West Mall Closure ■ Fiscal Impact: Approximately S500.00 ■ Staff recommendation: Council set a Public Hearing to consider the request from Atascadero Unified School District for the closure of West Mall between Lewis Avenue and Olmeda Avenue during Atascadero Junior High School hours. [Public Works] Public Works Director Steve Kahn gave the staff report and answered questions of Council. PUBLIC COMMENT Jim Stecher, Superintendent of Schools, stated this issue has been a concern for many years. The primary concern is for the safety of our community's children, and controlling who drives through school campuses and what their intentions are. Eric Greening stated that he supports the closure of West Mall during school hours. He questioned whether there would be an actual structure in the street during the hours the road was open and whether the sidewalks along West Mall or the street surface would remain open for bicycles and pedestrians during school hours. • CC 11/27/01 Page 7 007 Mayor Arrambide closed the Public Comment period. • There was Council consensus to direct staff to place this issue on a future agenda as a Public Hearing. 4. 2002 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP)- Project Funding ■ Fiscal Impact: 5423,000.00 STIP funds towards a State Project or the City of Atascadero's "Local Choice"project. ■ Staff recommendation: Council consider San Luis Obispo Council of Governments request that Atascadero's 2002 State Transportation Improvement Program `Local Choice"funds of 5423,000.00 be used as a match for the SR 41/US 101 Interchange Replacement Project. [Public Works] Public Works Director Steve Kahn gave the staff report and answered questions of Council. Steve Devenchenzi, SLOCOG, clarified SLOCOG's position and recommendations for Atascadero. He stated that SLOCOG estimates that 60-80% of the traffic on Highway 41 is local traffic but Atascadero is only being required to contribute 23% of the costs. Mr. Devenchenzi answered questions of Council. PUBLIC COMMENT Eric Greening stated he is opposed to an automotive bridge at Lewis Avenue until there is a plan on paper and assurances of child safety coordinated with the project. In Mr. Greening's opinion. if getting the interchange project completed means a delay to the Lewis Avenue automotive bridge for a little while, then that would be a needed consequence. There must be an actual plan on paper as promised in the staff report. He is overwhelming in favor of a bicycle/pedestrian bridge and would like to know if the $440,000 indicated is enough or will EE&M funds be needed in addition. Joan O'Keefe, 9985 Old Morro Road East, stated that citizens were originally told that there would be no money available to improve the interchange so she was surprised when later on they were told that there would be funds. To relieve back up on Highway 41 going east, she wondered if an arrow could be added going left and also permit traffic to go straight. Mayor Arrambide closed the Public Comment period. Council Member Luna stated that Council would be shooting themselves in the foot if they did not try to fix this problem, which was caused by the Highway 41 realignment. Council Member Johnson felt similarly to Council Member Luna, however, the vote has gone down once and he feels it will go similarly again. He feels Council needs to go forward and fix the problem. Council Member Clay felt the realignment was a positive thing and he agrees that the problem • CC 11/27/01 Page 8 008 needs to be fixed so the City can go forward. • The Council took no action on this item. 5. Lot Line Adjustment #2001-0033 - (City of Atascadero / Kelly Gearhart) 5599 Traffic Way & 5501 Traffic Way ■ Fiscal Impact: None ■ Staff recommendation: Council: 1. Adopt the draft Resolution "A" approving the acceptance of 2,500 +/- square feet of property proposed to be exchanged in Lot Line Adjustment 2001-0033, consistent with the Planning Commission's finding that the exchange of City property involved in LLA 2001-0033 is consistent with the City's General Plan as required by California Government Code Section 65402; and 2. Adopt the draft Resolution "B" approving Lot Line Adjustment 2001-0033, based on appropriate findings and subject to conditions of approval. [Community Development] This item was pulled from the Agenda by staff. D. COMMITTEE REPORTS: • Mayor Arrambide Mayor Arrambide announced the next Joint Councils meeting will be on January 24`h in San Luis Obispo at the Embassy Suites. The Mayors have discussed the idea of all the cities sharing the cost of the meeting. If we do share the costs, our portion in January will be approximately $400.00. Mayor Pro Tem Scalise 1. Economic Opportunity Commission (EOC): A presentation was given by David Edge, the San Luis County Administrator, regarding the coalition of doctors who have put an initiative on the March ballot regarding how the tobacco fund monies will be disbursed in this county. Mayor Pro Tem Scalise would like to see staff arrange for Mr. Edge to give his presentation to the Council. Council Member Clay 1. Air Pollution Control District (APCD): Bob Carr is retiring but will be rehired on a temporary basis until a replacement is found. The APCD Board approved solar electrical panels to be placed on their building to offset their electrical costs. • CC 11/27/01 Page 9 009 E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION: City Council: • Mayor Arrambide announced that tomorrow morning at 11:00 the City Council of Coalinga will be having a groundbreaking ceremony. Council Member Clay hoped that Council would support Able Maldonado's bill, as it is a safety issue for the community. Mayor Pro Tem Scalise stated that she would bring back a report on the comments from the Hospital Advisory Board on the Assembly Bill. City Treasurer: City Treasurer Graham reported that the City now has the option of investing up to $40 million of City Funds in LAIF. Also, there may be another quarter point drop when the FOMC meets in December. City Attorney City Attorney Hanley reported there was a settlement conference scheduled for tomorrow in Los Angeles for the Diamond vs. Atascadero lawsuit. Late this afternoon that date was cancelled with no new date set at this time. He will be appearing for a status conference on Monday next week and more information should be available from the judge at that time. City Manager: . City Manager McKinney announced that the City's new fire truck arrived this afternoon. F. ADJOURNMENT: Mayor Arrambide adjourned the meeting at 9:50 p.m. to the next regularly scheduled meeting on December 11tn MEETING RECORDED AND MINUTES PREPARED BY: Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk Attachment A—Council Member Clay- Overhead report Attachment B —Pearl Munak, Homeless Housing Project • CC 11/27/01 Page 10 Attachment : A Atascadero City Council Mtg . 11-27-01 • Bow and Arrow Hunting with in Atascadero's City limits. Report by, City Council Jerry Clay Sr 11/27/2001 Over the past two month the City of Atascadero has received a lot of Citizens input on Bow and Arrow hunting with in Atascadero's City Limits. This included a Sub-Committee public hearing November 14, 2001 that was attended by over 20 citizens of Atascadero. On behalf of the City of Atascadero and the City Council I have received a lot o written and verbal input on this subject. Based on this citizen information I'm recommending that the City Council hold a public hearing on Bow and Arrow hunting with in the City limits of Atascadero. 1. I'm recommending that this hearing be held after the Christmas Holydays in January 2002. 2. At this January City Council public hearing on this subject, I will provide the Council with my personal report and all the information that has been compiled on this subject in recent months. The City Council of course will have an opportunity hear from the public before they make their decision on what action to take. Possible action A. The Council could choose to take no action B. Could choose to have a modified ordinance that would allow Bow and arrow hunting in certain geographical areas or under certain conditions with in the City Limits.. C. Could chose to put an ordinance in place that would eliminate Bow and Arrow hunting and archery with in Atascadero's City limits. D. Could choose to put an ordinance in place that would eliminate Bow and Arrow hunting with in the Atascadero's City limits and still allow sports (target) archery with in the City limits. Side issues of concern. 1. The sport of Target Archery with in the City limits. 2. The over population of deer with in the City limits. Note: Fish and Game Warden Glenn Sparks at the November 14, Sub-Committee hearing stated he would have a biologist attend the council hearing and address the subject of deer contraception. 3. Trespassing and poaching by hunters with in the City Limits. Note: I talked with City Attorney Roy Hanley today. Roy said that if the City Council chooses to adopt some type of Bow and Arrow hunting ordinance he could tailor it to meet the council's wishes with in the confines of the law. • 0111 Attachment : B Atascadero City Council Mtg . 11-27-01 As the weather gets colder and wetter, the need for emergency shelter grows greater. With • the absence of a permanent shelter in the North County and the diminishing availability of funding for emergency shelter, the need for alternative emergency shelter plans become a higher priority. The Homeless Housing Project wants and needs the E.C.H.O. Church Emergency Shelter Plan to succeed. The Homeless Housing Project Motel Voucher Program has been in existence for almost four years and we have learned some hard lessons. The previous Church Emergency Shelter Plan (about eight years ago) has taught some hard lessons. The following questions, comments and concerns arise from those hard lessons and are offered to E.C.H.O. and the Atascadero City Council in an effort to help the E.C.H.O. Church Emergency Shelter Plan to succeed. The Homeless Housing Project supports the E.C.H.O. Church Emergency Shelter Plan and offers any assistance or resource to help the Program to sustain a prolonged alternative to available emergency shelter in the North County. The Homeless Housing Project, in cooperation with other agencies and organizations, has resources that are immediately available to lessen the cost of the proposed expenditures. (The greatest resource available is the Community of the North County.) Specifically, the Washer and Dryer ($1400), Sheet Sets ($500), Pillows ($400), Blankets ($1500), Van ($6000), and Cots ($2000) can be obtained through donations, for free. The $14,100 could be used for other needs (like motel vouchers). The Homeless Housing Project has a 1988 Vanagon with a wheel chair lift available now, at no cost. The Church Emergency Shelter Plan of eight years ago had difficulties that led to it's eventual discontinuation. It required 40 - 60 volunteers a month(2 per night) to run the program, not counting the people required to set it up each evening and take it down each morning. Many volunteers worked more than one night. In the course of the Church Emergency Shelter Plan, fewer volunteers were available to sustain the program. Clients were not necessarily connected to another agency (Social Services, E.O.C. etc). No one agency has the resources to resolve the complex problems of the homeless client. A client not connected to an agency will remain homeless (and in the program) longer. Other agencies can refer clients to the Church Emergency Shelter. Other agencies were offering motel rooms to clients at the same time the Church Emergency Shelter Program was offering space in a Church. Clients' first choice was the amenities of a motel room, resulting in fewer and fewer clients entering the Church Emergency Shelter Program Clients were reluctant to enter the program out of concern they would be "preached" to or converted to that religion where the program was at the time. Some clients were concerned that they would have to be of that Church in order to stay in the Church. This was not true, but it was the perception of some of the clients. In the morning, after shelter, there was nowhere for the client to go. Some clients remained at the church seeking other needs. Clients with children were concerned about safety and security in the Church shelter, as they are with any shelter environment and would not go preferring any other choice. The Church Shelter Plan of eight years ago major benefits were shelter (when no other shelter was available) and at a minimum cost. It was a valiant effort that could not be sustained. It's demise deterred other cohesive efforts. The E.C.H.O. Church Emergency Shelter Plan, as far as we know, addresses some of these difficulties. We are asking about liability insurance, the . availability of trained emergency medical staff, inclement weather plans (capacity appears to be 20 people - 20 cots), safety and security plans, the criteria for who can and can not stay in 0?2 • the Church Emergency Shelter and the availability of resources so clients do not have to have prolonged stays in the program. Is the E.C.H.O. Church Emergency Shelter Plan a Winter Shelter Plan ? The Homeless Housing Project Winter Shelter Plan operates from September 0 to March 31'. If implemented immediately as a Winter Shelter Plan, the E.C.H.O. Church Emergency Shelter Plan would provide up to 80 people (if it ran at capacity) 120 nights of Church Emergency Shelter (if it ran every day for four months) plus 42 motel shelter nights (total 122 people), at a cost of $20,000. With the shortage of housing (less than 2% of housing in the North County is available at any given time) and the cost of renting ($700 a month plus $2000 - first, last and security deposit),people will be in the Church Emergency Shelter Plan more than one day. The Homeless Housing Project, from December 2000 to April 2001, provided 409 people with 453 nights of emergency motel shelter at a cost of$20,546.17. The HHP MVP was under funded during that time period, curtailed the access to the Motel Voucher Program three times and turned away too many people due to a lack of funding. At the end of February 2001 and the beginning of March 2001, the North County experienced severe flooding. The HHPMVP opened to the public and provided emergency motel shelter to over 75 people in one weeks time. The E.C.H.O. Church Emergency Shelter Plan allows for 42 motel vouchers to be allowed to the Police Department, the Women's Shelter and the Homeless Housing Project. If the HEP is allowed to provide the materials sought through the expenditure of$14,100, those funds could be used to provide 350 more emergency motel shelter nights (at $40 per night, not $60 per night). This would give the program greater flexibility, and provide for emergency circumstances like the storms the North County had at the end of February and the beginning of March. 0 Many clients are referred to the HHPMVP from the Department of Social Services. We suggest that E.C.H.O. include the Department of Social Services to those who have access to the motel vouchers of the E.C.H.O. Program. If E.C.H.O. agrees, the Homeless Housing Project will refer all clients to the E.C.H.O. Program first, before accessing the Homeless Housing Project Motel Voucher Program. We would like to have all the agencies refer their clients to the E.C.H.O. Program first so the E.C.H.O. Church Emergency Shelter Plan can be at full capacity. Not only would this connect clients to agencies but would insure the success of the E.C.H.O. Program Motel Voucher Program Motel Voucher Program December 2000 through March 2001 April 2001 through September 2001 Month Adults Children Nights Cost Month Adults Children Nights Cost December 18 24 44 $1,799.78 April 38 35 73 3,148.81 January 18 16 50 $2,016.47 May 10 9 17 752.515 February 26 13 51 $2,035.10 June 5 1 13 581.99 •March 140 154 320 14,694.82 July 5+ 2+ 8 357.33 Total 202 207 465 20,546,17 August 12+ 6+ 22 816.95 September 18 10 32 1,499.08 Total 86 63 238 $7,156.66 013 ITEM NUMBER: A-2 DATE: 12/11/2001 19 9 Atascadero City Council City Treasurer David G. Graham, EA City Treasurers Agenda Report - October 2001 RECOMMENDATION: City Council approve the City Treasurers reports for the following periods: October 2001 DISCUSSION: The current 2 year treasury yield is 2.93%, up slightly from the 2.85% close in September; • however, the 8 basis point jump in the treasury yield occurred before the reports of consumer spending and consumer confidence were released. After absorbing the most recent economic data most economists are now projecting a further decline in treasury rates. Investors are anticipating a quarter point cut in the Federal Funds rate at the FOMC meeting on December Market conditions: Consumer confidence and more importantly consumer spending, which had been the economic underpinning of the current market, are now in a precipitous decline. The current Federal Funds rate stands at 2% with an anticipated 25 basis point cut on December 11th and possibly a final quarter point cut in January of 2002. A rate of 1.50% would be the lowest Federal Funds rate in forty years. Investment Strategy: The uncertainty of future State funding levels may require additional liquidity in the Cities investment portfolio. LAIFs mix of long and short-term maturities continue to be the preferred investment for short and medium term funds. For long-term funds it will be important to restrain maturities to coincide with any anticipated tightening by the Federal Reserve, which could occur in from 21 to 33 months. Assuming that we are near the bottom of the Federal Funds rate cuts fully FDIC insured CDs, and Agencies, will offer optimum yields and flexible liquidity as rates bottom out. Corporate yields can be expected to lead the market when an economic turn around • does occur. With the broad decline in corporate earnings however, commercial paper will require careful selection and constant monitoring. 04 City Treasurer's Report October 2001 David Graham i REPORT IN BRIEF: Cash and Investments Checking $ 586,607 Money Market Accounts 261,831 Certificates of Deposit 2,900,255 Government Securities 993,265 Corporate Paper - LAIF 13,338,717 Cash with Fiscal Agents 142,871 Cash in Banks at October 31,2001 $ 18,223,546 Deposits in Transit - Outstanding Checks (79,697) Cash and Investments at October 31,2001 $ 18,143,849 Investment Activity Securities Purchased: • Purchase Date Description Type Cost Maturity Date 10/29/01 Irwin Union Bank CD $ 95,000.00 04/29/05 Securities Matured: Maturity Date Description Type Original Cost Amount Matured 10/11/2001 The People's National Bank CD $ 93,907.52 $ 94,000.00 Securities Sold/Called Prior to Maturity: Transaction/ Original Cost/ Gain/(Loss) Transaction Date Description/Type Maturity Call Price on Call Called Federal Home Loan Bank $ 250,000.00 $ 250,000.00 $ - 10/26/2001 Government Security 7/26/2005 Called Federal Farm Credit Bank $ 250,000.00 $ 250,000.00 $ - 10/30/2001 Government Security 1/30/2004 Other Reportable Activities: None * Includes$95,000 which was wired from Mid-State Bank on 10/31/01,but not credited to Penson account until 11/2/01. i Page 1 of 10 015 CITY OF ATASCADERO TREASURER'S REPORT • CASH&INVESTMENTS ACTIVITYSUMMARY FOR THE MONTH OF OCTOBER 2001 CHECKING FISCAL ACCOUNT INVESTMENTS AGENT TOTALS Balance per Banks at October 1, 2001 $ 673,394 $ 16,837,353 $ 142,481 $ 17,653,228 Receipts 1,624,865 165,624 390 1,790,879 Disbursements (1,220,560) (1) - (1,220,561) Transfers In 423,908 915,000 - 1,338,908 Transfers Out (915,000) (423,908) - (1,338,908) Balance per Banks at October 31, 2001 $ 586,607 $ 17,494,068 $ 142,871 18,223,546 • Deposits in Transit - Outstanding Checks (79,697) Adjusted Treasurer's Balance $ 18,143,849 • 016 Page 2 of 10 d O O O t� oo O O O O O O O C O O O W 00 7 W) V) M Cl) C\ In kr)Q M N V G1 ON CN C\ N ^ � cs C� Qn V , ti 69 •ti h m cl 0 c0 cG c1 O OcC c0 j C C C C G G � \ C a A w) o 0 0 0 0 o c o 0 M 7 O O O O O O O O w kn M 7 Gkn 1 GN1 G�1 In nr L1 M N N 69 J o, In a C, cl cd c c e c e o c o o k en [•, h � � o d o v, kn o n n C � � � V � N h W oii [Q. , en In wl kn \.0 v v M qhs U ca c3 c j a, w WaQi 4)i a¢i Q V v Q a a0i Q h 4 c o 0 0 0 0 a o c o 0 V a� U U U C U U U U L L L �n U U U U U 0 U C U U c o 0 obi o 0 0GIN 7: C o QQ N N •-- N N N -- N -- N V Q In G\1 N G\\ W [� M G, cq r. Z RS O 1 +' Cc CO C -� C c G'C Vj C C p .y d ra oocl .0 M U c x L E c a Cc: s a0o a — " r0n Ga c o00 L' L V u 7 O C cYcno oD O cz a L V U = c 0 c = p t ami u o � s o 0 ca U U • GTi C�] .'�. GT. U < U Z u C: '3r' 3 U v h N N N N N N N (4 C O d O O O d O O O O h cd c i = v n i c� O7 l� O O O O O O O 017 O w h C% Vl CN G1 G� V1 v1 N 7 IN IN CN C1 C1 C1 D1 G1 G\ � h C► Cr N roll H cC m M cC M oo as ;0 'aC C C C C C o-o ,Mu. C C C C c Q N Q O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ^ O O O O O O O O O O O O V j N C C% C ni C. CN ON CN CN CCN � N �r a 69 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 v1 O w ll� [- Q A � O V Qy7 N o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ew„ v1 O O kf) O O In h O O v� eC vl l� C1 � O vl v1 �!1 C M M � �f t� w) as l cd \G m cd co ca 3 O R Qn O O O O O 'O O O O O O o a Cl. a a o a n a n z N U U N N U U U N N U U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 = ca ca Iz a a is cC is yN :Y u W u ° (u a) ° U U U U U U U U U U U V 0 o CN o 0 0 0 0 o C% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N M N N N C\ C\ oo Vl A oo w c U ol C c x •O ti w V] V .x a"i c ewe u W cn4. z r w pa ncTU ° x U cce a Li- t3 is z 3 cj Q b cd :2 a.cl Q a F U ci 0.1 o "0. ° � 3 z � xoa N N M M M M M M M M M M 44 O O O O O O O O O O O O (� 7 M O\O M NV\' h \ O O N N. G1 N N M 7 \/1 r- oo _ A oo 7[VOj` GN o Z o 0 0 0 C o O M o 0 o 0 Cw O O O O O O N O O a0 O 0, c; C% ^ ON vi o CN CN — C\ h � � G1 ON C% � 01 C\ N G1 G1 [� C\ O W V cl N C C O 06 v N a a O o o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o o O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O Cl 0 0 o O o 0 U j CN � CN CN cs rn � o � � o Q � k. p o a o 0 0 0 o a o e a o o 0 0 o e o 0 0 0 0 0 0 v'i Vl O O v1 v1 V O O 00 vl W O O O V? [� V M V1 v1 V1 N 00 7 A 0 U cL o 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 o a H A � 0 0 0 � � 0 0 � 0 o t= to kn oo o O O n O In V' M un v1 In N h W rl 'e\ of d d d l� d Q � e � h tj O W � � U ti M cls cl c ca cl S3 ca m o W � a, T Z o 0 0 0 0 0 0 % 0 0 0 0 CIIJ U 4QJ v U 0 v 0. W O O O O O O O O O O O U N +U+ N y U U U N U q U m ccs cd ca c'3 m cd E cd c0 m c0 u u 0 u u ami u o u u u u U U U U U U U C7 U U U U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 C, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q Q N N N N eq N N N N N N !-l! N V N M N O O w) G1 \ N M N N N N 4 [� C O o'2f Y i C 'n .� ocl "- cl >• c0a a G a x Oa O z cqj o ct an a b o o > o 5 CC CC O > O v s. O O O • 0 U W U v] O W A W U G=, Q Q ►� rr U hi M M M M M d' O O O C>V 0 Vl Vl O O O O G1CD N O N \V O O N F' ni CN01 O\ Q \ N M OO, O� � QO o 0 0 _ o O O O o O O 019 00 \ CD 00 00 3 - / W W 6 o § § # E � ■ / . / � § / § \ \ § \ ? o � / Q & r c '> a r - . / \ \ k R & / 2 § t . . tj � k \ a : k till � ( . . \ ) \ § ( * G / \ § \ / . % \ & \ k \ t 4 ft / % \ � _\ $ \ \ • \ o 2 >1 $ \ { D % k / / \ ƒ C % . \ .( \ Cd n = / u / / \ § \ ± U » to < _ / \ / \ / k . 020 City of Atascadero Investments by Type October 2001 • Cash with Gov't Fiscal Certificates Securities of Deposit 6% Agent 1% Other 17% 1% LAIF 76% Investment October 2001 LAIF $ 13,335,717 Certificates of Deposit 2,900,255 Government Securities 993,265 Corporate Paper - Cash with Fiscal Agent 142,871 Other 261,831 $ 17,636,939 • Page 7of10 V2-1 City of Atascadero Investments by Maturity • October 2001 One Month Within to One Year One to One Month 6% Five Years 0% 16% On Demand 78% Investment October 2001 On Demand $ 13,600,548 Within One Month 46,045 One Month to One Year 1,200,040 One to Five Years 2,647,434 $ 17,494,068 • Page 8of10 022 City of Atascadero Investments by Custodial Agent October 2001 • Gibraltar Bank Penson Securities Riverway of Financial 15% Trust New 1% York City of Corp. 1% Atascadero 7% 0% z }t: State of California 75% Custodial Agent October 2001 State of California $ 13,338,717 Penson Financial Corp. 1,391,024 Gibraltar Securities 2,619,282 Riverway Trust 99,000 Bank of New York 142,871 City of Atascadero 46,045 $ 17,636,939 • Page 9of10 023 City of Atascadero Investment Yield vs. 2-Year Treasury Yield For the Year Ended October 31, 2001 7.00°i° 6.00% 5.00% 4.00% 3.00% 2.00% 1.00% 0.00% 00 00 61 O� O� O^ O^ O^ O^ O^ O^ O^ O^ ry0 ,y0 �O ,LO �O zo �O ;y0 OG�o�ec ,e��ec oe ' 2 ��`.ti P19 �a� ,Jce �J�� PJAJy� `��ec �o�ec geQ� O° -City Yield 2-Yr Treasury Yield 2-Yr Treasury City Yield Yield October 2000 6.55% 5.89% November 2000 6.56% 5.58% December 2000 6.56% 5.13% January 2001 6.34% 4.70% February 2001 6.17% 4.53% March 20001 6.03% 4.29% April 2001 5.85% 4.39% May 2001 5.47% 4.32% June 2001 5.14% 4.34% July 2001 4.83% 3.83% • August 2001 4.74% 3.63% September 2001 4.54% 2.85% October 2001 4.08% 2.36% Page 10 of 10 f ITEM NUMBER: A-3 . .001.1 AM DATE: 12/11/2001 1818 i 19 9 d Atascadero City Council Staff Report-Administrative Services Department OCTOBER 2001 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE & PAYROLL RECOMMENDATION Approve certified City accounts payable,payroll and payroll vendor checks for October 2001. DISCUSSION Attached for City Council review and approval are the following: Payroll Dated 10/11/01 Checks#11545 - 11712 $ 188,958.10 • Dated 10/25/01 Checks# 11713 - 11865 164,149.92 Accounts Payable Dated October 1-31, 2001 Checks # 81 169 - 81563 & EFTs 556,123.19 TOTAL AMOUNT $ 909,231.21 FISCAL IMPACT Total expenditures for all funds is $ 909,231.21 CERTIFICATION The undersigned certifies that the attached demands have been released for payment and that funds are available for these demands. h 00 Rachelle Rickard,Administrative Services Director Approved by the City Council at a meeting held December 11, 2001. • Marcia M. Torgerson, City Clerk ATTACHMENT: October 2001 Eden Warrant Register in the amount of $ 556,123.19 0 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of October 2001 Check Check Number Date Vendor Description Amount 108 10/2/2001 MID-STATE BANK Payroll Vendor Payment 34,578.76 115 10/3/2001 MID-STATE BANK Accounts Payable Check 96.01 81169 10/8/2001 ABSOLUTE ASPHALT,INC. Accounts Payable Check 1,285.28 81170 10/8/2001 ACTION TOWING Accounts Payable Check 107.30 81171 10/8/2001 AGP VIDEO Accounts Payable Check 750.00 81172 10/8/2001 JOE ALLEN Accounts Payable Check 210.00 81173 10/8/2001 MIKE ALOI Accounts Payable Check 150.00 81174 10/8/2001 AMERICAN SANITATION Accounts Payable Check 192.60 81175 10/8/2001 ANIMAL SPECTRUM,INC. Accounts Payable Check 4,247.10 81176 10/8/2001 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 150.58 81177 10/8/2001 ATASCADERO BATTERY EXCHANGE Accounts Payable Check 183.60 81178 10/8/2001 ATASCADERO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Accounts Payable Check 65.00 81179 10/8/2001 ATASCADERO FORD Accounts Payable Check 2,700.11 81180 10/8/2001 ATASCADERO MAIN STREET,INC. Accounts Payable Check 11,250.00 81181 10/8/2001 ATASCADERO NEWS Accounts Payable Check 15.49 81182 10/8/2001 CATHERINE BEACH Accounts Payable Check 99 81183 10/8/2001 FRANCO BECHARA Accounts Payable Check 21 81184 10/8/2001 JIM BERMANN Accounts Payable Check 176.40 81185 10/8/2001 BEST BEST&KRIEGER LLP Accounts Payable Check 1,259.00 81186 10/8/2001 TOM BIRKENFELD Accounts Payable Check 70.00 81187 10/8/2001 BOB KEULEN CONSTRUCTION Accounts Payable Check 760.00 81188 10/8/2001 JOSH BOWLING Accounts Payable Check 210.00 81189 10/8/2001 CASEY BRYSON Accounts Payable Check 140.00 81190 10/8/2001 CALPELRA Accounts Payable Check 1,725.00 81191 10/8/2001 JIM CAMPANA Accounts Payable Check 120.00 81192 10/8/2001 CDW GOVERNMENT,INC. Accounts Payable Check 483.96 81193 10/8/2001 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL CED Accounts Payable Check 24.87 81194 10/8/2001 CENTRAL COAST SEA FOOD Accounts Payable Check 148.50 81195 10/8/2001 CENTRAL COAST STRIPING Accounts Payable Check 1,110.00 81196 10/8/2001 CHEM CLEAN Accounts Payable Check 77.58 81197 10/8/2001 BRADY CHERRY Accounts Payable Check 300.00 81198 10/8/2001 CHEVRON Accounts Payable Check 769.32 81199 10/8/2001 CHICAGO GRADE LANDFILL,INC. Accounts Payable Check 54.90 81200 10/8/2001 CARIN CHILDRESS Accounts Payable Check 2� City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of October 2001 Check Check Adlk%Jurnber Date Vendor Description Amount 81201 10/8/2001 JOSEPH CHOUINARD P.E. Accounts Payable Check 4,201.13 81202 10/8/2001 COASTLINE EQUIPMENT Accounts Payable Check 2,928.61 81203 10/8/2001 COMCO COMPUTERS Accounts Payable Check 170.13 81204 10/8/2001 VINCE CONDE Accounts Payable Check 120.00 81205 10/8/2001 CONSOLIDATED SEED&PET,INC. Accounts Payable Check 331.61 81206 10/8/2001 COUNTRY COPY Accounts Payable Check 132.78 81207 10/8/2001 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER Accounts Payable Check 12.00 81208 10/8/2001 CSN CONFERENCE Accounts Payable Check 30.00 81209 10/8/2001 CUESTA COLLEGE Accounts Payable Check 297.37 81210 10/8/2001 BRIAN DANA Accounts Payable Check 210.00 81211 10/8/2001 DARRYL'S LOCK AND SAFE Accounts Payable Check 27.82 81212 10/8/2001 DAVID M FLEISHMAN Accounts Payable Check 800.00 81213 10/8/2001 DAN DAVIS Accounts Payable Check 357.00 81214 10/8/2001 DECOU LUMBER COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 226.80 81215 10/8/2001 DEPARTMENT OF FISH&GAME Accounts Payable Check 344.00 81216 10/8/2001 DGM ARCHITECT Accounts Payable Check 5,412.05 81217 10/8/2001 DIVERSIFIED RISK INSURANCE Accounts Payable Check 128.09 • 81218 10/8/2001 ECONOMIC VITALITY CORP OF SLO Accounts Payable Check 135.00 81219 10/8/2001 EMPLOYER ADVISORY COUNCIL Accounts Payable Check 30.00 81220 10/8/2001 FARM SUPPLY COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 29.95 81221 10/8/2001 FIRMA Accounts Payable Check 2.200.00 81222 10/8/2001 FOOD FOR LESS Accounts Payable Check 183.80 81223 10/8/2001 FOX&SOHAGI,LLP Accounts Payable Check 703.67 81224 10/8/2001 VERLA D.FREDERICK Accounts Payable Check 474.00 81225 10/8/2001 GAS COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 159.39 81226 10/8/2001 GEM AUTO PARTS Accounts Payable Check 136.19 81227 10/8/2001 MIKE GIL Accounts Payable Check 15.00 81228 10/8/2001 KENNETH GLYNN Accounts Payable Check 283.50 81229 10/8/2001 RANDY GRIFFITH Accounts Payable Check 15.00 81230 10/8/2001 H.D.PETERSON Accounts Payable Check 22.15 81231 10/8/2001 REGIONALD HICKS Accounts Payable Check 175.00 81232 10/8/2001 HOBBY SHOP Accounts Payable Check 695.96 81233 10/8/2001 INFORMATION SERVICES DIVISION Accounts Payable Check 114.77 81234 10/8/2001 INTERNATIONAL TRAINING RES,LTD Accounts Payable Check 978.00 • 81235 10/8/2001 J.CHRISTOPHER TOEWS Accounts Payable Check 270.00 81236 10/8/2001 STEVEN KAHN Accounts Payable Check 305.00 G 2 7 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of October 2001 Check Check Number Date Vendor Description A o unAlft 81237 10/8/2001 LESLYN KEITH Accounts Payable Check 7 81238 10/8/2001 CHUCK KENDRICK Accounts Payable Check 51.00 81239 10/8/2001 BRIAN KENNEDY Accounts Payable Check 240.00 81240 10/8/2001 L.N.CURTIS&SONS Accounts Payable Check 421.92 81241 10/8/2001 LAIDLAW TRANSIT SERVICES,INC. Accounts Payable Check 14 871.99 81242 10/8/2001 LERN Accounts Payable Check 295.00 81243 10/8/2001 JENNIFER MALONE Accounts Payable Check 43.46 81244 10/8/2001 MARQUIS PALMS SPRINGS CONFEREN Accounts Payable Check 1,452.30 81245 10/8/2001 JOHN MARTINO Accounts Payable Check 177.00 81246 10/8/2001 VOID Accounts Payable Check 0.00 81247 10/8/2001 WADE MCKINNEY Accounts Payable Check 400.00 81248 10/8/2001 SAM MCMILLAN Accounts Payable Check 30.00 81249 10/8/2001 METROTEK INDUSTRIES,INC. Accounts Payable Check 307.50 81250 10/8/2001 MID-COAST MOWER&SAW Accounts Payable Check 25.06 81251 10/8/2001 PAUL MILLER Accounts Payable Check 187.00 81252 10/8/2001 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 72.14 81253 10/8/2001 MITCH FREDERICK SEALCOATING Accounts Payable Check 1,020.00 81254 10/8/2001 MUNICIPAL RISK SERVICES LTD Accounts Payable Check 81255 10/8/2001 MYERS-STEVENS AND CO.,INC. Accounts Payable Check 100.00 81256 10/8/2001 NATIONAL EMBLEM,INC. Accounts Payable Check 297.79 81257 10/8/2001 TERRY O'FARRELL Accounts Payable Check 122.00 81258 10/8/2001 HEATHER OSGOOD Accounts Payable Check 39.68 81259 10/8/2001 PEST MANAGEMENT P.A.P.A. Accounts Payable Check 110.00 81260 10/8/2001 PACIFIC BELL Accounts Payable Check 865.68 81261 10/8/2001 PACIFIC HOME DO IT CENTER Accounts Payable Check 185.81 81262 10/8/2001 PANASONIC COMMUNICATIONS Accounts Payable Check 944.55 81263 10/8/2001 LORI PARCELLS Accounts Payable Check 300.00 81264 10/8/2001 PASO ROBLES ELECTRIC,INC. Accounts Payable Check 586.44 81265 10/8/2001 PC MALL Accounts Payable Check 192.70 81266 10/8/2001 FIRE DEPARTMENT PETTY CASH Accounts Payable Check 100.38 81267 10/8/2001 VOID Accounts Payable Check 0.00 81268 10/8/2001 POOR RICHARD'S PRESS Accounts Payable Check 82.78 81269 10/8/2001 BAS PRINS Accounts Payable Check 25.00 81270 10/8/2001 PRODUCERS DAIRY FOODS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 23.00 81271 10/8/2001 PROF MARC MERMAN Accounts Payable Check I* G2& City of Ataseadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of October 2001 Check Check umber Date Vendor Description Amount 81272 10/8/2001 QUILL CORPORATION Accounts Payable Check 921.58 81273 10/8/2001 QUINN RENTAL SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 515.21 81274 10/8/2001 RADIO SHACK Accounts Payable Check 1.49 81275 10/8/2001 RICHARD SHANNON&JIMMIE SHORE Accounts Payable Check 4,444.87 81276 10/8/2001 RACHELLE RICKARD Accounts Payable Check 300.00 81277 10/8/2001 CAROLE ROBINSON Accounts Payable Check 122.00 81278 10/8/2001 JOHN RODGERS Accounts Payable Check 334.13 81279 10/8/2001 STEVE ROMO Accounts Payable Check 60.00 81280 10/8/2001 SADDLE WEST HOTEL Accounts Payable Check 740.55 81281 10/8/2001 SAFETY STRIPING SERVICE,INC. Accounts Payable Check 4,942.46 81282 10/8/2001 SAN LUIS PAINTS Accounts Payable Check 134.07 81283 10/8/2001 SANTA MARIA TIRE,INC. Accounts Payable Check 525.60 81284 10/8/2001 MICHELE SCHAMBER Accounts Payable Check 122.00 81285 10/8/2001 STEVE SCHNARS Accounts Payable Check 122.00 81286 10/8/2001 LISETTE SCHOLL Accounts Payable Check 147.00 81287 10/8/2001 SCMAF Accounts Payable Check 25.00 81288 10/8/2001 GRACE PUCCI,SECRETARIAL SERVICES BY GRACE Accounts Payable Check 60.00 • 81289 10/8/2001 VOID Accounts Payable Check 0.00 81290 10/8/2001 SIERRA VISTA REGIONAL MED CTR Accounts Payable Check 67.00 81291 10/8/2001 TOM SILVA Accounts Payable Check 204.00 81292 10/8/2001 KEISHA SLANE Accounts Payable Check 90.00 81293 10/8/2001 SLORTA Accounts Payable Check 2,250.00 81294 10/8/2001 CHARLES L.SMITH Accounts Payable Check 204.00 81295 10/8/2001 ROLAND SNOW Accounts Payable Check 280.00 81296 10/8/2001 SO CA TRAINING OFFICERS ASSN Accounts Payable Check 250.00 81297 10/8/2001 SOLANO PRESS BOOKS Accounts Payable Check 48.80 81298 10/8/2001 KURT W.STONE Accounts Payable Check 245.00 81299 10/8/2001 TASK FORCE TIPS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 76.19 81300 10/8/2001 THE COUNSELING TEAM Accounts Payable Check 730.00 81301 10/8/2001 CHRISTOPHER TRAY Accounts Payable Check 1,380.88 81302 10/8/2001 ROSEMARY&HENRY TROSSET Accounts Payable Check 1,500.00 81303 10/8/2001 UNISOURCE MAINT SUPPLY SYSTEMS Accounts Payable Check 211.41 81304 10/8/2001 TOM VELASQUEZ Accounts Payable Check 51.00 81305 10/8/2001 VERIZON WIRELESS Accounts Payable Check 36.26 • 81306 10/8/2001 ERIC VITALE Accounts Payable Check 210.00 81307 10/8/2001 VONS Accounts Payable Check 38.34 029 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of October 2001 Check Check Number Date Vendor Description Amoun 81308 10/8/2001 TOM WAY Accounts Payable Check 140. 81309 10/8/2001 KELLY WELSH Accounts Payable Check 122.00 81310 10/8/2001 WESTERN JANITOR SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 161.78 81311 10/8/2001 JEFF WILSHUSEN Accounts Payable Check 210.00 81312 10/8/2001 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES,INC. Accounts Payable Check 512.42 81313 10/9/2001 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE CO Payroll Vendor Payment 753.13 81314 10/9/2001 COLONIAL LIFE&ACCIDENT INS. Payroll Vendor Payment 2,050.84 81315 10/9/2001 CPIC LIFE Payroll Vendor Payment 1,462.60 81316 10/9/2001 DELTA DENTAL,ATTN:ACCOUNTING Payroll Vendor Payment 6,233.48 81317 10/9/2001 EQUITABLE LIFE Payroll Vendor Payment 348.88 81318 10/9/2001 LIFEGUARD INC. Payroll Vendor Payment 34,893.75 81319 10/10/2001 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL CED Accounts Payable Check 148.99 81320 10/10/2001 VALERIE HUMPHREY Accounts Payable Check 224.48 81321 10/10/2001 WADE MCKNNEY Accounts Payable Check 100.00 81334 10/11/2001 DAN MCGAULEY Accounts Payable Check 1,233.34 81342 10/11/2001 MICHELE SCHAMBER Accounts Payable Check 470 81322 10/12/2001 ATASCADERO FED.CREDIT UNION Payroll Vendor Payment 5,110.00 81323 10/12/2001 ATASCADERO FIRE DEPT EMP.ASSN Payroll Vendor Payment 210.00 81324 10/12/2001 ATASCADERO FIRE RESERVES ASSN Payroll Vendor Payment 75.00 81325 10/12/2001 ATASCADERO MID MGRS ORG UNION Payroll Vendor Payment 30.00 81326 10/12/2001 ATASCADERO POLICE OFFICERS ASN Payroll Vendor Payment 354.75 81327 10/12/2001 COUNTY-CITY EMPLOYEES CU Payroll Vendor Payment 895.00 81328 10/12/2001 EMPLOYMENT DEV DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 7,535.37 81329 10/12/2001 EMPLOYMENT DEV.DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 600.54 81330 10/12/2001 FAMILY SUPPORT DIVISION Payroll Vendor Payment 261.69 81331 10/12/2001 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE Payroll Vendor Payment 5,015.62 81332 10/12/2001 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 Payroll Vendor Payment 500.00 81333 10/12/2001 KENNEDY CLUB FITNESS Payroll Vendor Payment 47.00 81335 10/12/2001 PERS LONG TERM CARE PROGRAM Payroll Vendor Payment 59.07 81336 10/12/2001 PUBLIC EMPL RETIREMENT SYSTEM Payroll Vendor Payment 18 095.07 81337 10/12/2001 SEIU LOCAL 620 AFL-CIO Payroll Vendor Payment 428.82 81338 10/12/2001 FAMILY SUPPORT DIVISION Payroll Vendor Payment 444.00 81339 10/12/2001 UNITED WAY OF SLO COUNTY Payroll Vendor Payment 3 0 81340 10/12/2001 WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK Payroll Vendor Payment 1,13 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of October 2001 Check Check umber Date Vendor Description Amount 81341 10/12/2001 WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK Payroll Vendor Payment 432.00 110 10/16/2001 MID-STATE BANK Payroll Vendor Payment 34 344.77 81343 10/17/2001 EMPLOYMENT DEV DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 2,546.88 81344 10/17/2001 GAS COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 132.42 111 10/18/2001 MID-STATE BANK Payroll Vendor Payment 8,520.05 81345 10/19/2001 A-B EMBLEM Accounts Payable Check 70.00 81346 10/19/2001 ALBERTSONS Accounts Payable Check 95.91 81347 10/19/2001 ALLSTAR FIRE EQUIPMENT,INC. Accounts Payable Check 2,347.88 81348 10/19/2001 AMERICAN TRAINING RESOURCES Accounts Payable Check 529.65 81349 10/19/2001 ANDERSON'S AUTO SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 285.32 81350 10/19/2001 ANTECH DIAGNOSTICS Accounts Payable Check 101.00 81351 10/19/2001 APPLIED TECHNOLOGY GROUP,INC. Accounts Payable Check 15,350.16 81352 10/19/2001 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 232.28 81353 10/19/2001 ARCH Accounts Payable Check 1,461.81 81354 10/19/2001 AT&T Accounts Payable Check 82.22 S81355 10/19/2001 ATASCADERO FORD Accounts Payable Check 869.95 81356 10/19/2001 ATASCADERO MUTUAL WATER CO. Accounts Payable Check 15.00 81357 10/19/2001 ATASCADERO NEWS Accounts Payable Check 150.00 81358 10/19/2001 ATASCADERO YOUTH TASK FORCE Accounts Payable Check 140.00 81359 10/19/2001 AVAYA INC. Accounts Payable Check 22.36 81360 10/19/2001 TIFFANY AYLES Accounts Payable Check 28.50 81361 10/19/2001 CINDY K.BENSON Accounts Payable Check 516.60 81362 10/19/2001 BOTACH TACTICAL.COM Accounts Payable Check 99.79 81363 10/19/2001 BRENDLER JANITORIAL SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 700.00 81364 10/19/2001 CAL-COAST REFRIGERATION,INC Accounts Payable Check 486.50 81365 10/19/2001 CALIFORNIA JOURNAL Accounts Payable Check 43.00 81366 10/19/2001 CCES Accounts Payable Check 63.69 81367 10/19/2001 CDW GOVERNMENT,INC. Accounts Payable Check 537.80 81368 10/19/2001 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL CED Accounts Payable Check 520.20 81369 10/19/2001 CELLULARONE Accounts Payable Check 678.40 81370 10/19/2001 CENTRAL COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT Accounts Payable Check 242.10 81371 10/19/2001 CENTRAL COAST SANITATION Accounts Payable Check 56.58 • 81372 10/19/2001 CENTRAL VALLEY TOXICOLOGY Accounts Payable Check 103.00 81373 10/19/2001 LEILA CHAMBERS Accounts Payable Check 250.00 031 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of October 2001 Check Check Number Date Vendor Description Amo 81374 10/19/2001 CHANNING L.BETE CO.,INC. Accounts Payable Check 93. 81375 10/19/2001 CHEVRON Accounts Payable Check 2,374.12 81376 10/19/2001 CHEVRON Accounts Payable Check 411.89 81377 10/19/2001 CHICAGO GRADE LANDFILL,INC. Accounts Payable Check 34.20 81378 10/19/2001 CLEAN WATER SYSTEMS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 35.00 81379 10/19/2001 COASTAL IMAGING SUPPLIES Accounts Payable Check 224.70 81380 10/19/2001 VINCE CONDE Accounts Payable Check 120.00 81381 10/19/2001 CIMON CORMIER Accounts Payable Check 34.00 81382 10/19/2001 COUNTY PLANNING Accounts Payable Check 150.00 81383 10/19/2001 CPRS DISTRICT VIII Accounts Payable Check 120.00 81384 10/19/2001 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER Accounts Payable Check 86.00 81385 10/19/2001 VOID Accounts Payable Check 0.00 81386 10/19/2001 CUESTA COLLEGE Accounts Payable Check 241.54 81387 10/19/2001 CUESTA EQUIPMENT Accounts Payable Check 51.80 81388 10/19/2001 DARRYL'S LOCK AND SAFE Accounts Payable Check 10.70 81389 10/19/2001 DECOU LUMBER COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 116.26 81390 10/19/2001 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Accounts Payable Check 974 81391 10/19!2001 DGM ARCHITECT Accounts Payable Check g 33 81392 10/19/2001 DHE Accounts Payable Check 72.84 81393 10/19/2001 DISCOUNT SCHOOL SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 74.94 81394 10/19/2001 DISPLAY SALES Accounts Payable Check 94.00 81395 10/19/2001 DONALD JACOBS DISTRIBUTING Accounts Payable Check 2,086.50 81396 10/19/2001 EASY AD Accounts Payable Check 40.00 81397 10/19/2001 ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY COMMISSIO Accounts Payable Check 2,994.26 81398 10/19/2001 EL CAMINO CAR WASH LLC Accounts Payable Check 38.00 81399 10/19/2001 ESCUELA DEL RIO Accounts Payable Check 46.80 81400 10/19/2001 EXXON MOBIL Accounts Payable Check 453.95 81401 10/19/2001 FARMER&READY Accounts Payable Check 1,000.00 81402 10/19/2001 FERRELL'S AUTO REPAIR Accounts Payable Check 294.33 81403 10/19/2001 FIRE COM Accounts Payable Check 118.73 81404 10/19/2001 FIRE MAINTENANCE COMPANY,LLC Accounts Payable Check 142.00 81405 10/19/2001 FIRE OUT UNIFORM COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 287.13 81406 10/19/2001 FIRE SERVICE SPECIFICATION&S Accounts Payable Check 361.66 81407 10/19/2001 FIRST FLIGHT Accounts Payable Check 82.50 81408 10/19/2001 FIRSTLINE,LLC Accounts Payable Check I 032 City of Ataseadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of October 2001 Check Check OuLm7ber Date Vendor Description Amount 81409 10/19/2001 FISHER SCIENTIFIC Accounts Payable Check 44.10 81410 10/19/2001 FOOD FOR LESS Accounts Payable Check 172.42 81411 10/19/2001 WARREN FRACE Accounts Payable Check 12.09 81412 10/19/2001 FRAZEE PAINTS Accounts Payable Check 56.28 81413 10/19/2001 FRESNO BEE Accounts Payable Check 227.68 81414 10/19/2001 KAREN GARMAN Accounts Payable Check 458.50 81415 10/19/2001 GEM AUTO PARTS Accounts Payable Check 324.26 81416 10/19/2001 GENERAL HOSPITAL Accounts Payable Check 259.00 81417 10/19/2001 GEORGE'S TAX SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 25.00 81418 10/19/2001 MIKE GIL Accounts Payable Check 15.00 81419 10/19/2001 DAVID GRAVES Accounts Payable Check 550.00 81420 10/19/2001 GRISANTI HARDWARE Accounts Payable Check 54.60 81421 10/19/2001 H.D.PETERSON Accounts Payable Check 19.18 81422 10/19/2001 MARY HAGOPIAN Accounts Payable Check 60.00 81423 10/19/2001 HART IMPRESSIONS PRINT© Accounts Payable Check 370.56 81424 10/19/2001 HAWTHORNE SUITES HOTEL Accounts Payable Check 297.00 81425 10/19/2001 HEALTH ESSENTIALS OF CALIFORNI Accounts Payable Check 25.00 • 81426 10/19/2001 HENRY SCHEIN,INC. Accounts Payable Check 185.96 81427 10/19/2001 HINDERLITER,DE LLAMAS Accounts Payable Check 1,276.96 81428 10/19/2001 HOBBY SHOP Accounts Payable Check 475.00 81429 10/19/2001 HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS Accounts Payable Check 108.90 81430 10/19/2001 HOMAN ENGINEERING Accounts Payable Check 344.66 81431 10/19/2001 HON Accounts Payable Check 4,590.31 81432 10/19/2001 INFINITY CABLE PRODUCTS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 208.07 81433 10/19/2001 JENCKS LAW GROUP Accounts Payable Check 332.34 81434 10/19/2001 JIFFY LUBE#1932 PCJL,INC. Accounts Payable Check 112.27 81435 10/19/2001 JIM'S CAMPUS CAMERA Accounts Payable Check 85.44 81436 10/19/2001 JOBS AVAILABLE,INC. Accounts Payable Check 101.20 81437 10/19/2001 K-MART Accounts Payable Check 290.74 81438 10/19/2001 CHUCK KENDRICK Accounts Payable Check 51.00 81439 10/19/2001 BRIAN KENNEDY Accounts Payable Check 150.00 81440 10/19/2001 L.N.CURTIS&SONS Accounts Payable Check 385.65 81441 10/19/2001 ROD LANDIS Accounts Payable Check 425.00 81442 10/19/2001 LEMOS FEED&PET SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 59.90 • 81443 10/19/2001 GLENNA LOFTIS Accounts Payable Check 45.00 81444 10/19/2001 LONGS DRUG STORES Accounts Payable Check 74.85 033 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of October 2001 Check Check Number Date Vendor Description Amnimidift 81445 10/19/2001 RUDY LORTON Accounts Payable Check 60. 81446 10/19/2001 LYNDON'S AUTOMOTIVE Accounts Payable Check 871.05 81447 10/19/2001 MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK,INC. Accounts Payable Check 161.70 81448 10/19/2001 MARDI GRAS OF SLO Accounts Payable Check 250.00 81449 10/19/2001 MASTERCARD DEPARTMENT 1850 Accounts Payable Check 10.65 81450 10/19/2001 MASTERCARD DEPARTMENT 4093 Accounts Payable Check 621.93 81451 10/19/2001 MASTERCARD DEPARTMENT 4101 Accounts Payable Check 321.60 81452 10/19/2001 MASTERCARD DEPARTMENT 4119 Accounts Payable Check 468.81 81453 10/19/2001 MASTERCARD DEPARTMENT 4135 Accounts Payable Check 1,197.63 81454 10/19/2001 MASTERCARD DEPARTMENT 4150 Accounts Payable Check 229.77 81455 10/19/2001 MASTERCARD DEPARTMENT 4168 Accounts Payable Check 119.48 81456 10/19/2001 MASTERCARD DEPARTMENT 6108 Accounts Payable Check 769.90 81457 10/19/2001 MASTERCARD DEPARTMENT 9902 Accounts Payable Check 463.90 81458 10/19/2001 MAXIMUS Accounts Payable Check 750.00 81459 10/19/2001 MARY MCCULLOCH Accounts Payable Check 44.27 81460 10/19/2001 SAM MCMILLAN Accounts Payable Check 15.00 81461 10/19/2001 KIRK MCROBERTS Accounts Payable Check 66. 0 81462 10/19/2001 METROTEK INDUSTRIES,INC. Accounts Payable Check 12 81463 10/19/2001 MICRO WAREHOUSE Accounts Payable Check 243.65 81464 10/19/2001 PAUL MILLER Accounts Payable Check 51.00 81465 10/19/2001 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 179.29 81466 10/19/2001 MITCH FREDERICK SEALCOATING Accounts Payable Check 510.00 81467 10/19/2001 MOORE'S WESTERN NURSERY Accounts Payable Check 148.51 81468 10/19/2001 ASHLEY MORTON Accounts Payable Check 33.00 81469 10/19/2001 MUNIFINANCIAL Accounts Payable Check 1,681.99 81470 10/19/2001 MUSIC FACTORY Accounts Payable Check 329.20 81471 10/19/2001 NEW HORIZONS Accounts Payable Check 1,500.00 81472 10/19/2001 NEWCO DISTRIBUTORS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 340.40 81473 10/19/2001 NORTHWEST BUSINESS STAMP Accounts Payable Check 7.90 81474 10/19/2001 NS TECHNOLOGY INC. Accounts Payable Check 330.00 81475 10/19/2001 PACIFIC BELL Accounts Payable Check 401.56 81476 10/19/2001 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC Accounts Payable Check 778.09 81477 10/19/2001 PACIFIC HOME DO IT CENTER Accounts Payable Check 133.38 81478 10/19/2001 PAPER WORKS Accounts Payable Check 283.28 81479 10/19/2001 PC MALL Accounts Payable Check 2,160 034: City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of October 2001 Check Check umber Date Vendor Description Amount 81480 10/19/2001 PENNY MEN Accounts Payable Check 159.25 81481 10/19/2001 PERRY'S PARCEL SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 66.20 81482 10/19/2001 PETE JOHNSTON CHEVROLET Accounts Payable Check 136.35 81483 10/19/2001 PITNEY BOWES,INC. Accounts Payable Check 135.89 81484 10/19/2001 POOR RICHARD'S PRESS Accounts Payable Check 665.11 81485 10/19/2001 POWER CONVERSION PRODUCTS,LLC Accounts Payable Check 2,349.72 81486 10/19/2001 QUILL CORPORATION Accounts Payable Check 1,383.09 81487 10/19/2001 R&S ERECTION OF MONTEREY BAY Accounts Payable Check 1,700.00 81488 10/19/2001 R.H.F.INC. Accounts Payable Check 114.00 81489 10/19/2001 RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATES OF SLO Accounts Payable Check 41.00 81490 10/19/2001 RADIOTRONICS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 264.00 81491 10/19/2001 RAINBOW MEALWORMS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 29.98 81492 10/19/2001 RECOGNITION WORKS Accounts Payable Check 6.42 81493 10/19/2001 REESE WATER&LAND SURVEYING S Accounts Payable Check 4,000.00 81494 10/19/2001 JOHN RODGERS Accounts Payable Check 105.00 81495 10/19/2001 STEVE ROMO Accounts Payable Check 60.00 81496 10/19/2001 SAN JOAQUIN SUPPLY COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 54.42 i81497 10/19/2001 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY SHERIFF Accounts Payable Check 15 881.25 81498 10/19/2001 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY VISITOR Accounts Payable Check 1,460.00 81499 10/19/2001 SAN LUIS PAINTS Accounts Payable Check 43.38 81500 10/19/2001 SAN LUIS PERSONNEL INC. Accounts Payable Check 396.00 81501 10/19/2001 SAN LUIS POWERHOUSE Accounts Payable Check 192.50 81502 10/19/2001 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY EMS Accounts Payable Check 75.00 81503 10/19/2001 SANTA MARIA TIRE,INC. Accounts Payable Check 851.85 81504 10/19/2001 LAWRENCE SARVER Accounts Payable Check 45.00 81505 10/19/2001 GRACE PUCCI,SECRETARIAL SERVICES BY GRACE Accounts Payable Check 502.50 81506 10/19/2001 SHERIFF'S ADVISORY COUNCIL Accounts Payable Check 70.00 81507 10/19/2001 JIM D. SHORES Accounts Payable Check 12,902.25 81508 10/19/2001 JOHN SIEMENS Accounts Payable Check 80.00 81509 10/19/2001 SIERRA VISTA REGIONAL MED CTR Accounts Payable Check 462.50 81510 10/19/2001 SIGN OUTLET Accounts Payable Check 85.00 81511 10/19/2001 TOM SILVA Accounts Payable Check 34.00 81512 10/19/2001 SIR SPEEDY Accounts Payable Check 425.09 81513 10/19/2001 SLOCOMOTION Accounts Payable Check 25.68 • 81514 10/19/2001 SOUZA CONSTRUCTION INC. Accounts Payable Check 80,144.51 81515 10/19/2001 STEVE ARNOLD'S HONEYBEE&WASP Accounts Payable Check 325.00 a City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of October 2001 Check Check Number Date Vendor DescriptionAmou 81516 10/19/2001 STEWART'S WHEEL SHOP Accounts Payable Check 175. 0 81517 10/19/2001 SUNLIGHT JANITORIAL Accounts Payable Check 1,280.00 81518 10/19/2001 SYLVESTER'S SECURITY ALARMS Accounts Payable Check 395.00 81519 10/19/2001 TAYLOR RENTAL CENTER Accounts Payable Check 32.87 81520 10/19/2001 TEMPLETON FEED&GRAIN Accounts Payable Check 40.00 81521 10/19/2001 TEMPLETON UNIFORMS Accounts Payable Check 166.55 81522 10/19/2001 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR Accounts Payable Check 420.12 81523 10/19/2001 TODD PIPE&SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 475.08 81524 10/19/2001 KIM TREECE Accounts Payable Check 28.50 81525 10/19/2001 TRIBUNE Accounts Payable Check 404.45 81526 10/19/2001 TRIBUNE Accounts Payable Check 641.31 81527 10/19/2001 TWIN CITIES HOSPITAL Accounts Payable Check 17.00 81528 10/19/2001 U.S.ARMOR CORPORATION Accounts Payable Check 28.50 81529 10/19/2001 UNISOURCE MAINT SUPPLY SYSTEMS Accounts Payable Check 206.53 81530 10/19/2001 UNITED GREEN MARK,INC. Accounts Payable Check 1,058.60 81531 10/19/2001 UNITED STATES DEPT OF AGRICULT Accounts Payable Check 235.00 81532 10/19/2001 TOM VELASQUEZ Accounts Payable Check 11 81533 10/19/2001 VENTURA COLLEGE Accounts Payable Check 81534 10/19/2001 VERIZON WIRELESS Accounts Payable Check 84.84 81535 10/19/2001 VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS Accounts Payable Check 485.33 81536 10/19/2001 ERIC VITALE Accounts Payable Check 45.00 81537 10/19/2001 VONS Accounts Payable Check 5.09 81538 10/19/2001 NANCY E.WEBBER,PH.D. Accounts Payable Check 279.00 81539 10/19/2001 CATHY WEEKS Accounts Payable Check 152.47 81540 10/19/2001 KELLY WELSH Accounts Payable Check 620.00 81541 10/19/2001 WESTERN JANITOR SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 91.25 81542 10/19/2001 Z.A.P.MANUFACTURING,INC. Accounts Payable Check 1,319.44 81543 10/19/2001 ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SLO CO Accounts Payable Check 500.00 81544 10/19/2001 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES,INC. Accounts Payable Check 373.97 81545 10/25/2001 CJP PRODUCTIONS Accounts Payable Check 5,851.00 81546 10/26/2001 ATASCADERO FED.CREDIT UNION Payroll Vendor Payment 5,110.00 81547 10/26/2001 ATASCADERO FIRE DEPT EMP.ASSN Payroll Vendor Payment 210.00 81548 10/26/2001 ATASCADERO MID MGRS ORG UNION Payroll Vendor Payment 30.00 81549 10/26/2001 ATASCADERO POLICE OFFICERS ASN Payroll Vendor Payment 3 81550 10/26/2001 COUNTY-CITY EMPLOYEES CU Payroll Vendor Payment 895 0 3 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of October 2001 Check Check Aftumber Date Vendor Description Amount 81551 10/26/2001 EMPLOYMENT DEV DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 6,703.81 81552 10/26/2001 EMPLOYMENT DEV.DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 592.22 81553 10/26/2001 FAMILY SUPPORT DIVISION Payroll Vendor Payment 261.69 81554 10/26/2001 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE Payroll Vendor Payment 5,015.62 81555 10/26/2001 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 Payroll Vendor Payment 500.00 81556 10/26/2001 KENNEDY CLUB FITNESS Payroll Vendor Payment 47.00 81557 10/26/2001 PERS LONG TERM CARE PROGRAM Payroll Vendor Payment 59.07 81558 10/26/2001 PUBLIC EMPL RETIREMENT SYSTEM Payroll Vendor Payment 18,016.37 81559 10/26/2001 SEIU LOCAL 620 AFL-CIO Payroll Vendor Payment 460.09 81560 10/26/2001 FAMILY SUPPORT DIVISION Payroll Vendor Payment 444.00 81561 10/26/2001 UNITED WAY OF SLO COUNTY Payroll Vendor Payment 38.00 81562 10/26/2001 WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK Payroll Vendor Payment 1,001.72 81563 10/26/2001 WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK Payroll Vendor Payment 432.00 112 10/30/2001 MID-STATE BANK Payroll Vendor Payment 31 645.84 S 556,123.19 • • Oil ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 12/11/2001 1918 i 19 9 Atascadero City Council Staff Report — City Manager's Office City Council 2002 Meeting Schedule RECOMMENDATION: Council approve City Council meeting schedule for 2002. DISCUSSION: The City Council, pursuant to Chapter 2, Section 1.01 of the Atascadero Municipal Code, meets the second and fourth Tuesday of each month. Upon occasion, the Council will hold special • study sessions and/or joint meetings with the Planning Commission on a fifth Tuesday. The Council has requested that regular joint meetings with the Planning Commission be scheduled and holidays be avoided. Staff has prepared the attached schedule for the year 2002 to help in the coordination of these meetings with personal schedules. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: City Council 2002 Meeting Schedule • 038 e' «� ® '18 CITY OF ATASCADERO 19 f 1919 9 OFFICE of the CITY CLERK Atascadero City Council 2002 Meeting Schedule MEETING DATE TYPE OF MEETING January 08 Regular January 22 Regular January 29 Joint City Council/Planning Commission(tentative) February 12 Regular February 26 Regular March 12 Regular March 26 Regular April 9 Regular • April 23 Regular April 30 Joint City Council/Planning Commission (tentative) May 14 Regular May 28 Regular June 11 Regular June 25 Regular July 09 Regular August 13 Regular September 10 Regular September 24 Regular October 08 Regular October 22 Regular November 12 Regular November 26 Regular December 10 Regular • 039 6500 PALMA AVENUE 9 ATASCADERO,CA 93422 (805) 461-5074 ITEM NUMBER: A-5 DATE: 12/11/2001 • 191a ' i. 19-79 Atascadero City Council Staff Report — Community Services Department Improvements to Paloma Creek Park Memorial Field - Request by Atascadero Little League RECOMMENDATION: Council: 1. Approve request by Atascadero Little League to make the following improvements to Memorial Field at Paloma Creek Park: a. Install a section of chain link fence to create a Pitchers warm-up area b. Install backstop pole extensions • c. Remove the infield turf 2. Temporarily delay a request by Atascadero Little League to make the following improvements to Memorial Field at Paloma Creek Park: a. Build a full-sized batting cage beyond the right field fence. b. Install lights for night baseball 3. Direct staff to work with Atascadero Little League on the development of a long-range Master Plan for Paloma Creek Park that considers future desires for improvements to Memorial Field by Atascadero Little League. DISCUSSION: Atascadero Little League has submitted a letter to the City of Atascadero requesting permission to make improvements to Memorial Field at Paloma Creek Park. Memorial Field is the primary baseball field for Atascadero Little League. Over the years, Atascadero Little League has made numerous improvements to this baseball field and has been a partner with the City in the upkeep and maintenance of this facility. Atascadero Little League is interested in making further improvements to this facility including the specific following improvements: a. Install a section of chain link fence to create a Pitchers warm-up area . b. Install backstop pole extensions c. Remove the infield turf d. Install lights to Memorial Field which would allow for night play. e. Install a full batting cage immediately outside the right field fence of Memorial field 040 ITEM NUMBER: A-5 DATE: 12/11/2001 Staff supports the efforts of Atascadero Little League to make additional improvements to • Memorial Field and feels that it is appropriate to recommend immediate approval of the three following requested improvements: a. Install a section of chain link fence to create a Pitchers warm-up area b. Install backstop pole extensions c. Remove the infield turf These improvements are relatively minor and would not require review by the State Hospital. The State Hospital by lease agreement requires that physical improvements to Paloma Creek be reviewed by the State Department of Real Estate. This process is long and cumbersome. Minor improvements such as the three recommended for approval by staff do not generally require review by the State. Staff is currently in the process of renegotiating a lease with the State for Paloma Creek Park, as the current lease expires in July of 2002. As part of this process to extend the lease, City staff will submit a long-range development plan for Paloma Creek Park. Staff will include Atascadero Little League, Atascadero Youth Soccer, and other organizations that use Paloma Creek Park, in the process to develop this long-range development plan. The two additional requested physical improvement items not recommended for approval could be considered during the process to develop this long range plan. On Thursday, November 15, 2001, the Parks and Recreation Commission voted unanimously to • recommend approval to the City Council of the three minor improvements requested by Atascadero Little League and listed above and to temporarily delay the approval of the two additional requested physical improvements until a long range plan can be developed for Paloma Creek Park. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: Attachment- Letter from Atascadero Little League Map of Paloma Creek Park • 041 • October 30,2001 Atascadero Little League P.O. Box 2375 Atascadero, CA 93423 Geoff English, Supervisor Parks &Recreation Dept. City of Atascadero Geoff, Atascadero Little League would like to formally request permission to initiate improvements to the youth baseball facility ay Paloma.Creek Park. These improvements, in part, comprise a wish list to be undertaken as funds allow. They are the following: 1. Chain link enclosures adjacent to the player benches to allow pitchers to safely warm-up without risking injury to spectators. 2. A full-sized,permanent batting cage beyond the right field fence, (approximately 12 feet high x 16 feet wide x 70 feet long), with the possible addition of a half cage (10 x 14 x 35) adjacent to it. Both cages would be enclosed by lockable chain link fencing for • security.. 3. A backstop pole extension with netting to reduce expenses and possible injuries to spectators and property from foul balls. 4. Removal of the infield grass to allow for a dirt infield, with the necessary changes to the irrigation design. 5. Lights for night baseball. This is the biggest expense and may be a few years away, but the loss of fields available at the public schools makes this a high priority. I hope this request can be coordinated with the City of Atascadero and the State of California discussions on the future improvements of Paloma Creek Park. Little League would, of course, pay for all the aforementioned improvements that, if implemented, would greatly enhance both the safety and the quality of Atascadero's youth baseball. Sinc rel Peter Kinkade President, Atascadero Little League • 042 c '141 �A -, fL5AL471, 47-CRvi, R,(�4,A 50FtBRLL F/£L� S •/S' ALGf 5 S X90'�.xlsTING /J' SAFI,* 8A5K�TBR�L� fbssr&� , GOIJ�'T5 NORs�� 14� iAR i SA F�Ty 601:;FLR B 15' M Q ,4cciS5 Rb -3Rr cAGL TtIN f FoLL 1�gTT/N6 CA5f (A6 4 o11>F%LGQ ,I f�ti�-- iI � � • I I i I I AeO)Aa:a P1T.91,V6 , £xl giNG G I 6'A 50' J r;0-r e 43, ITEM NUMBER: A-6 _ DATE: 12/11/2001 isle r, 5-79 Atascadero City Council Staff Report — Community Services Department Plant a Memorial Tree in Atascadero Lake Park- Request by the Atascadero Mom's Club RECOMMENDATION: Council approve the request by the Atascadero Mom's Club to plant a Memorial Tree at Atascadero Lake Park DISCUSSION: The Atascadero Mom's Club has requested that the City of Atascadero allow them to plant a tree •' in Atascadero Lake Park to memorialize one of their members who recently perished in a vehicle accident. The Policy on the Naming of Public Buildings, Parks and Other Public Facilities includes a provision to be followed by staff for the recognition of individuals. SECTION II, E. "In addition to the naming of public facilities by using the criteria established above, the City can provide for the recognition of individuals, either deceased or living, by the placement of memorial objects (symbols); such as living trees, public benches, rocks, memorial flagpoles, sculptures, etc., in public facilities. The placement and identification of these recognition symbols will be at the discretion of the Parks and Recreation Commission and the City Council on a case-by-case basis. Staff has identified potential locations in Atascadero Lake Park for the planting of such Memorial trees. All related costs to the planting of this tree will be covered by the Atascadero Mom's Club. On Thursday, November 15, 2001, the Parks and Recreation Commission unanimously recommend to the City Council, approval of a request by the Atascadero Mom's Club to plant a • Memorial Tree at Atascadero Lake Park. FISCAL IMPACT: None 0.14 ITEM NUMBER: A-7 _ DATE: 12/11/2001 Fm AN 1 • isia� o 19-79 Atascadero City Council Staff Report — Public Works Department 2002 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) SR 411US 101 Interchange Match RECOMMENDATION: Council approve the allocation of$423,000.00 of Street and Bridge Impact Fee Funds as a match for the State Route 41/US 101 Interchange Replacement Project and authorize staff to enter into a cooperative agreement with San Luis Obispo Council of Governments (SLOCOG) to formalize the allocation. • DISCUSSION: The City Council reviewed the 2002 STIP at the last Council meeting and decided to follow the recommendation of SLOCOG staff. In that recommendation the City's "Local Choice" funds would be pledged to the SR 41/US 101 Interchange Replacement Project which was initially funded in the 1998 STIP with $8,979,000.00. The project is in design at Caltrans. Recent construction cost estimates anticipate the project to be underfunded by$6,416,945.00. City staff has reviewed the various funding sources available for road improvements and is proposing an alternate strategy that would continue to support the SLOCOG recommendation and implement the Council action. The City has a choice of using it's "Local Choice" funds from the 2002 STIP or produce funds from another source. Staff proposes to use the Street and Bride Impact Fee funds for the SR 4l/1JS 101 match instead of the "Local Choice" funds. The impact fees are collected specifically for this type of project and the nexus is easily made. This would preserve the "Local Choice" funds which can be used with more flexibility in the Atascadero Road Program. The Atascadero Road Program could use the $423,000.00 to continue to improve the roads of Atascadero. There is no additional cost or savings, this measure would only direct the funding source of the various projects. FISCAL IMPACT: • $423,000.00 from Street and Bridge Impact Fee Fund. 045 ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 _a c a r, 11F0- 1� DATE: 12/11/2001 e Atascadero City Council Staff Report - Community Development Department Lot Line Adjustment #2001-0033 (City of Atascadero / Kelly Gearhart) 5599 Traffic Way & 5501 Traffic Way RECOMMENDATIONS: Council: 1. Adopt the draft Resolution "A" approving the acceptance of 2,500 +/- square feet of property proposed to be exchanged in Lot Line Adjustment 2001-0033, consistent with the Planning Commission's finding that the exchange of City property involved in LLA 2001-0033 is consistent with the City's General Plan as required by California Government Code Section 65402. 2. Adopt the draft Resolution `B" approving Lot Line Adjustment 2001-0033, based on appropriate findings and subject to conditions of approval. SUBJECT: Adjustment of lot lines between two lots of record owned by the City Of Atascadero and a private landowner. The adjustment is an equal exchange of area (2,500 +/- square feet) between two lots to facilitate the construction of an improved access road to the Youth / Community Center site. SITUATION AND FACTS: 1. Applicant: City of Atascadero 6500 Palma Avenue Atascadero CA 93422 • 2. Property Owner Lot#1: Kelly Gearhart 6205 Alcantara Avenue Atascadero CA 93422 047 ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 12/11/2001 A. Address Lot#1: 5501 Traffic Way • B. Property Owner: Kelly Gearhart C. Legal Description: Lot 1 of Parcel Map 43-56 D. General Plan Designation: Industrial E. Zoning District: Industrial 3. Property Owner#2: City of Atascadero 6500 Palma Avenue Atascadero CA 93422 A. Address Lot#2: 5599 Traffic Way B. Property Owner: City of Atascadero C. Legal Description: Lot 2 of Parcel Map 43-56 D. General Plan Designation: Public, Industrial, Recreation E. Zoning District: Public Industrial, Recreation 4. Site Area: 12+/- Acres 5. Environmental Status: Class 5 Exemption. CEQA Section 15305 DISCUSSION: Planning Commission Action: When public property is being sold, exchanged, or disposed of, California Government Code Section 65402 requires the Planning Commission to prepare a report that indicates the exchange of the property conforms with the General Plan. The Planning Commission reviewed the exchange of city property involved in Lot Line Adjustment 2001-0033 at the November 20, 2001 Planning Commission meeting and adopted Resolution PC 2001-0067, recommending the City Council find that the disposition of City property involved in LLA 2001-0033 is consistent with the City's General Plan as required by California Government Code Section 65402. The Commission found that the disposition of the property is in conformance with the General Plan because the lot line adjustment will facilitate the construction of an access drive to the new Youth/ Community Center site, which will in turn facilitate the development of the new Youth / Community Center. The Youth / Community Center is a project that is consistent with the • adopted Land Use and Parks and Recreation Elements of the General Plan and has been a long- term goal for the city. 048 ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 12/11/2001 • Background: The City proposes to adjust the lot lines between two legal lots. The lot line adjustment is an equal exchange of area between two parcels, in that the proposed lot line adjustment will adjust the common side property line between the parcels, but the gross area of the parcels will remain the same. The intent of this lot line adjustment is to provide the City of Atascadero with an alternative access driveway to the Atascadero Youth/ Community Center, located at 5493 Traffic Way. The existing legal access to this property is located between two commercial properties, Central Coast Seafood and Conte Woodworking. This entrance is deemed to be undesirable as an entrance to the proposed Youth Community Center. The property owner of the parcel adjacent to Traffic Way Park, Kelly Gearhart has agreed to a lot-line adjustment to provide the City of Atascadero, which will provide a preferred alternate access- driveway location. Prope City is Transferring ;:91001 oerty City is Acquiring w Youth /Community Center Site 7 ,7 Proposed Location for New Access Drive Analysis: Only building and zoning standards must be met. The City's subdivision regulations set certain standards for lot line adjustments. However, the State Subdivision Map Act (Section 66412(d) of the California Government Code) takes precedence over any local California jurisdiction's subdivision regulations, and states that lot line adjustments may be reviewed for compliance with building and zoning codes only. If an application meets those codes or can be conditioned to meet them, then it must be approved. Therefore, any specific standards in the City's subdivision regulations that do not relate to building or zoning are not • applicable. As noted below, the lot line adjustment as conditioned is consistent with zoning and building codes. 049 ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 12/11/2001 The lot line adjustment is consistent with the General Plan and Zoning Regulations, and with the Building Code. Lot 91 is designated Industrial on the General Plan Land Use Map, and is presently zoned Industrial. Lot #2 is a "multi-zoned" lot. The lot has a land use designation and corresponding zoning districts of Public, Industrial, and Recreation. The land use designations do not follow lot lines. The portion of the lot that will be adjusted is within the Industrial land use and zoning district. The land use and zoning district lines follow a lot line that was extinguished by a lot line adjustment in 1987. During the 1992 General Plan update, the old parcel line was used as the boundary for the Industrial District as shown on the following exhibit. The portion of the Industrial zoned property adjusted by the lot line adjustment will be available for future industrial uses by Mr. Gearhart. •.'^N-4 � i#'kms * i #a � }• €�R�.� � �••����� �� g�iFss � ss s} ♦ �jR { s # � 4 a..ss•s s s R � s s � iF iP s s a � w • w � s s s ■ P s� �s ♦ s i b • s s ! s a .s i s -. ss�s r s - + � is � •�ti s ! '' s. fi s s•s s,' 1t � • s +F�a ,ss sus'. s �i+�' 8ss 's ! • i 1 INDUSTRIAL Lot Owned by City—A single lot with . three land use designations: Industrial, Recreation and Public Land Use ' Designation Lot Owned by Mr. , Gearhart—Industrial Land Use Designation kv *. DaaeIV SITE sin, ��'&'��� 4yq �� �� ,'9. � I � •' "• w' s -. + M Lot line extinguished by a lot line adjustment in 1987(PM 43- 56) ry • *,-,* + i n 5 050 ITEM NUMBER: B- i DATE: 12/11/2001 The lot line adjustment will facilitate the construction of an access to the new Youth/Community • Center site which is consistent the adopted Land Use and Parks and Recreation Elements of the General Plan. No building code issues. The lots are developed with Industrial and Public uses. Environmental Review: The lot line adjustment is exempt from environmental review, because it is a minor change in land use limitations, occurring on property with an average slope under 20%. (CEQA Class 5 Categorical Exemption). Conclusion: The Lot Line Adjustment application is consistent with the General Plan and applicable building and zoning code requirements and the exchange of City property for the purposes of installing a preferred access drive to the new Youth / Community Center conforms with the General Plan. FISCAL IMPACT: None. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A - Location Map • Attachment B - Draft Resolution of Approval "A" (Exchange of Property) Attachment C - Draft Resolution of Approval "B"(Lot Line Adjustment) • 051 ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 12/11/2001 Attachment A: Location Map LLA o • Disposition of City Property Project Site �.T Tit �.3 i - - s �wy a 011pd� z� 052 ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 12/11/2001 • Attachment B: Draft Resolution PC 2001-0067 LLA 2001-0033 General Plan Conformity Report Disposition of City Property DRAFT RESOLUTION "A" A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO AUTHOURIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTER A CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE FOR REAL PROPERTY ASSOCIATED WITH LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 2001-0033. WHEREAS, The City of Atascadero (herein referred to as "City") is a public entity established under the laws of California, and WHEREAS, the City desires to have an improved access road to the Atascadero Youth/Community Center, parcel 028-361-003 from Traffic Way Park; and WHEREAS, the owner of adjacent parcel 029-091-035, has agreed to an even trade of property with the City of Atascadero in order to facilitate this improved access road; and . WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has found that the lot line adjustment is consistent with the City's General Plan; and, WHEREAS, Deeds conveying an interest in real property require a Certificate of Acceptance in order to be recorded; and, WHEREAS, the Atascadero City Council, at a duly noticed meeting held on December 11, 2001, studied and considered the Planing Commission General Plan Conformity recommendation on Lot Line Adjustment 2001-0033. IT IS NOW RESOLVED THAT: The City Manager is authorized to sign all documents necessary and convenient to record the final documents approving Final Lot Line Adjustment 2001-0033, and to accept the real property transferred to the city thereby shown on attached Exhibit A On Motion by Council Member and seconded by Council Member the foregoing Resolution was adopted on the following roll-call vote: AYES: • NOES: 053 ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 12/11/2001 ABSENT: ADOPTED: CITY OF ATASCADERO J. Michael Arrambide Mayor ATTEST: Marcia McClure Torgerson City Clerk Approved as to form: Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney • 054 ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 12/11/2001 Exhibit A • Tentative Lot Line Adjustment Map Lot Line Adjustment 2001-0033 5501 Traffic Way and 5599 Traffic Way f f � V Detail kJ i _ J t � l� "� ,3"-i•�r�`t } i�7+�`>�'�F`:>, 1-' 1 fid, ' �i�.1 �i(�I 1 -_� •a© ' i'i;. •' ff � R4 t ..`^i r• t rp �� of a■ �q` �� L 7-in Existing Lot Configuration Proposed Lot Configuration 055 ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 12/11/2001 Attachment C Draft Resolution Lot Line Adjustment 2001-0033 • 5501 Traffic Way and 5599 Traffic Way DRAFT RESOLUTION "B" A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVING LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 2001-0033 THEREBY ALLOWING AN EQUAL EXCHANGE OF AREA BETWEEN TWO LOTS (5599 Traffic Way / 5501 Traffic Way / City of Atascadero / Gearhart) WHEREAS, an application has been received from the City of Atascadero (6500 Palma Avenue, Atascadero, CA 93423) applicant / property owner and Kelly Gearhart (6205 Alcantara Avenue, Atascadero, CA 93422) property owner, to consider a project consisting of an equal exchange of property between two lots; and, WHEREAS, the portions of the lot affected by the lot line adjustment have a General Plan Designation of Industrial (I); and, WHEREAS, the portions of the lot affected by the lot line adjustment have a current zoning district of Industrial (I); and, WHEREAS, the PlanningCommission has found that the lot line adjustment is • � consistent with the City's General Plan; and, WHEREAS, the laws and regulations relating to the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) have been adhered to; and, WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 65402 requires the Planning Commission to prepare a report that indicates the exchange of the property conforms with the City's General Plan; and WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed staff report upon the subject of the General Plan Conformity Report relating to the proposed Lot Line Adjustment was held by the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero at which meeting the Planning Commission found that the exchange of City property involved in LLA 2001-0033 is consistent with the City's General Plan; and, WHEREAS, the Atascadero City Council, at a duly noticed meeting held on December 11, 2001 studied and considered the Planning Commission General Plan Conformity recommendation on Lot Line Adjustment 2001-0033. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council takes the following actions: • SECTION 1. Class 5 Categorical Exemption. The Planning Commission finds that the proposed project is consistent with the Class 1 Categorical Exemption per section 15305 of the 056 ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 12/11/2001 CEQA Guidelines, pertaining to the minor change in land use limitations, occurring on property • with an average slope under 20%. SECTION 2. Findings of Approval for Lbt Line Adjustment, the Council of the City of Atascadero finds as follows: a) The lot line adjustment conforms with all applicable building, zoning, and subdivision regulations of the City of Atascadero and is consistent with the City's General Plan. SECTION 3. Approval. The Atascadero City Council, in a regular session assembled on November 27, 2001 resolved to approve Lot Line Adjustment 2001-0033 subject to the following: a) Exhibit A: Lot Line Adjustment 2001-0033 b) Exhibit B: Conditions of Approval On motion by Council Member and seconded by Council Member the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted following roll call vote: AYES: • NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ADOPTED: By: J. Michael Arrambide, Mayor Attest: Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk Approved as to form: • Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney 0 7 ITEM NUMBER: B- I DATE: 12/11/2001 Exhibit A • Tentative Lot Line Adjustment Map Lot Line Adjustment 2001-0033 5501 Traffic Way and 5599 Traffic Way � p f lJt / vr Detailol ``. i y illi. � � � • fiillll{.111 p I it {��C7✓l��I ,�1�: __ �� ;Iii C 1 1'� t 1 ., T\ e \ ,t •t 6 ,�.. :1 I I y� - -' FU Existing Lot Configuration Proposed Lot Configuration . 058 ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 12/11/2001 • Exhibit B Findings and Conditions of Approval Lot Line Adjustment 2001-0033 5501 Traffic Way and 5599 Traffic Way CONDITIONS: 1. The lot line adjustment as generally shown on the map attachment provided herein shall be submitted reflected in a record of survey and Certificates of Compliance (1), or deeds to be approved by the Community Development Department and City Engineer prior to recordation. The deeds shall be submitted in the City's Certificate of Compliance standard format. 2. Approval of this lot line adjustment shall expire two years from the date of approval unless a time extension has been granted in response to a written request received prior to the expiration date. 3. The applicant shall show the ATAL number issued by the County of San Luis Obispo (on the record of survey map or included in "Exhibit B" of the Certificates of Compliance); plat all plottable easements with recording information, list all unplottable easements, and show the legal description for the properties being adjusted. • 4. If a record of survey is submitted, a mylar copy of the survey shall be submitted to the Community Development Department for approval prior to recordation. r 0 5,q ITEM NUMBER: B-2 ITEM NUMBER: B-2 DATE: 12/11/2001 Applicant: Jim Shores, PO Box 216,Atascadero, CA 93423 • Project Title: Atascadero Avenue Single Family Planned Development ZCH 2001-0014, CUP 2001-0048, TTM 2001-0007 Project 6555 Atascadero Avenue,Atascadero, CA 93422 Location: (San Luis Obispo County)APN 030-201-001, 002 Project The proposed project consists of an application for a zone change, Description: conditional use permit(CUP) and tentative tract map. The zone change request would establish a Planned Development#7 overlay on the site subject to a master plan of development (CUP)that would allow seven(7) single family residences to be constructed. The tentative tract map would create a seven(7) lot subdivision. The project would be subject to architectural and landscape standards. The project site is a flat lot with one existing single family house and is adjacent to Atascadero Creek. General Plan Designation: LDMF (Low Density Multi-Family) Zoning District: RMF-10 (Residential Multi-Family 10-bedrooms per acre) Site Area: 1.01 acres Environmental Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration • Status Posted: 10/17/01 Review Ends: 11/6/01 DISCUSSION: Planning Commission Action The Planning Commission held a public hearing for the project on November 6, 2001. The Commission is recommending approval of the project on a 7-0 vote. Copies of the Commission's minutes are attached as Attachment 6 and copies of the approved resolutions are on file with the City Clerk. The attached resolutions and ordinance incorporate the recommendations of the Commission. The Planning Commission dealt with two separate project issues that require further Council direction. The issues include the character and function of the sidewalks and the dedication of a creek side trail to the City for ownership and maintenance. 1. Sidewalks The project has been conditioned by the City Engineer to install sidewalks along both the Atascadero Avenue and Santa Ynez Avenue frontages. This condition is consistent with City policy of requiring sidewalks in multi-family areas and around schools. The Commission's primary concern was regarding the appearance of the sidewalks and their compatibility with the ITEM NUMBER: B-2 DATE: 12/11/2001 • neighborhood's rural character. The City standards call for the sidewalk to be attached to the back of the curb similar to El Camino Real. At the November 20th Planning Commission meeting, staff conducted a study session to discuss the issue of sidewalk character. The Commission concluded that a detached sidewalk with a planter strip between the sidewalk and the curb would be a more appropriate solution in this setting. Staff has incorporated this change into the project conditions as shown in the following diagram. Detached sidewalk behind parkway planter "W"M s 2 5t rip T OP PW S PUE The Commission was also concerned about ending the sidewalk at the creek bridge without a pedestrian crossing available on that side of the bridge. The City Engineer has looked at the situation and is not recommending an additional pedestrian crossing at this time. 2. Creek Trail Dedication The project was originally conditioned by staff to provide a 6-foot public access easement along Atascadero Creek in the location of an existing footpath. The Commission concurred that the pathway was a necessary part of the project but is recommending that the City accept the dedication and maintenance of this pathway. At the Council appeal of the Ferrocarril parcel map on November 13, the Council voted not to accept a similar pathways as a public dedication. The Council should clarify its position on this issue as part of the project's approval. Currently the project is conditioned for the pathway to be dedicated consistent with the Commission's recommendation (refer to condition #12 in Resolution "B"). The Council will need to amend condition 12 if dedication of the pathway is not desired. • ITEM NUMBER: B-2 DATE: 12/11/2001 Condition 12 • A 6-foot wide pedestrian access shall be dedicated to the City easemen with a 4-foot wide decomposed granite walking pathway shall be provided along the entire property line fronting Atascadero Creek. Analysis of Planning Issues 3. Project Summary/PD-7 Consistency The proposed project consists of seven detached, single family units (one existing and six new) located on individual lots that will be developed under the requirements of the PD-7 overlay district within the RMF-10 (Residential Multi-Family) zoning district. Each unit will have a maximum of two bedrooms and a 1000± square foot living area. The existing house will remain as a three bedroom unit. The proposed project is consistent with the maximum bedroom density allowances of the zoning ordinance. All units will have a two car attached garage with two additional uncovered spaces provided in the driveway that fulfill the guest parking requirement. Each unit is consistent the PD-7 requirement of providing a minimum 40% parcel landscaping and building foot prints of less than 35% of the parcel area. A Master Plan of Development will cover all site development and architectural design standards for the project. The Master Plan of Development will be approved in the form of a Conditional Use Permit as required by the Zoning Ordinance. Changes to the Master Plan of Development can be made by the Planning Commission in the future independent of Council action. Project Density Calculations . Multi-Family Residential Density Calculator RMF 10/ 0-10% Proposed %Slope Density Lot Area 0-10% 43,560 sf 1-bed units 4,356 sf/du 0.0 du 0 sf 2-bed units 5,808 sf/du 6.0 du 34,848 sf 3-bed units 8,712 sf/du 1.0 du 8,712 sf 4-bed units+ 11,463 sf/du 0.0 du 0 sf 7.0 du • LU� ITEM NUMBER: B-2 DATE: 12/11/2001 • Proposed Project Summary z Ot LQt0 Lot 4 LotS L©t Lflt . Lot Area 5073 sf 5754 sf 5380 sf 7916 sf 5225 sf 5000 sf 9558 sf Building Footprint 1509 sf 1509 sf 1509 sf 1509 sf 1509 sf 1509 sf 2000 sf (not to exceed 35%) 30% 26% 28% 19% 29% 30% 21% Landscaped Area 2630 sf 2796 sf 2190 sf 5060 sf 2920 sf 2929 sf 5500 sf (minimum 40%) 52% 49% 41% 64% 56% 59% 58% Covered Parking 2 spaces 2 spaces 2 spaces 2 spaces 2 spaces 2 spaces 2 spaces Guest Parking 2 spaces 2 spaces 2 spaces 2 spaces 2 spaces 2 spaces 2 spaces 4. Design and Appearance The Master Plan of Development will control site design and appearance issues including landscaping and architecture. The project has been designed with single story residential units that incorporate architectural materials and styles found on neighboring historic houses. All street elevations will have lap siding with a stone wainscot treatment at the base. Architectural embellishments including Craftsman's style eave corbels, window shutters and covered front porches are included on all units. Two separate color schemes are proposed for the project. All trash storage and air conditioning condenser units will be screened from view behind fenced enclosures. The site landscaping plan includes a variety of native and accent trees. Shurb planter areas are proposed around the parking areas, street frontages and building foundations to accent the project's architecture. All landscape maintenance will be the responsibility of the individual property owner. 5. Oak Tree Preservation The site contains twenty-one native oaks trees. The project has been designed to preserve eleven of the largest trees. A cluster of nine smaller native trees is located where unit four is proposed and are requested for removal. The landscape plan has been conditioned to protect the area within the trees drip lines from over irrigation. The mitigation measure require Native oaks trees shall be preserved and protected during construction unless approved for removal. Prior to permit issuance, a Tree Protection Plan shall be prepared for the project by a certified arborist and approved by Planning Services. Tree protection shall be in place prior to the issuance of any construction permits and the arborist shall be under contract to monitor tree protection. The mitigation measures call for the removed trees to be mitigated with twenty native tree replantings along the creek banks. • 064 ITEM NUMBER: B-2 DATE: 12/11/2001 Native Tree Removal Summary • Evergreen Native Trees(inches) Deciduous Native Trees(inches) Totals dbh notes dbh notes 1 4-inches live oak 1 14-inches white oak 2 2 8-inches white oak 3 3 5-inches white oak 4 4 7-inches white oak 5 5 5-inches white oak 6 7-inches white oak 7 4-inches white oak 6 8 8-inches white oak Total 4-inches Total 58-inches 62-inches Mitigation Requirement req'd tree replacements: 1 five gal trees req'd tree replacements: 19 five gal trees 20 five gal trees Proposed Replanting 0 five gal trees Proposed Replanting 0 five gal trees 0 five gal trees 0 box trees(24") 0 box trees(24") 0 box trees(24") Remaining Mitigation 1 five gal trees Remaining Mitigation 19 five gal trees 20 five gal trees 6. Atascadero Creek The project is located adjacent to Atascadero Creek and has been designed to respect the creek. Staff has coordinated with the Upper Salinas—Las Tablas Resource Conservation District on the design of the project. A stormwater sedimentation pond has been incorporated into the project to filter stormwater and maintain historic runoff rates. This will protect both the water quality of the creek and minimize the potential for increased creek bed erosion. A pedestrian access easement and walking path will be developed as part of the project to formalize an existing dirt pathway along the creek bank. The project is conditioned to install additional native oaks and native plants along creek bank. These plants will increase the riparian canopy and shading along the creek Although not indicated on FEMA maps, portions of the site have been determined by the project engineer to be within the historic 100-year flood plain of Atascadero Creek. The project is designed so that all units will be constructed 1-foot above the 100-year event. The units along the creek will be constructed with stem walls so that additional fill is not introduced along the creek. 7. Project Benefits One of the required findings for the approval for a planned development rezone is that the project must '`offer certain redeeming features to compensate for the requested modification." Due to the site's limited area no room is available on site for any common recreational facilities. However, it appears that the project will have a number of"redeeming features" which include the following: 1) a public access easement and pathway will be provided along the Atascadero Creek frontage, 2) each unit will have a private yard area that will allow for outdoor recreational opportunities, 3) architectural and landscape features of the project have been designed to • enhance the project's appearance and benefit the surrounding neighborhood, and 4) the project 065 ITEM NUMBER: B-2 DATE: 12/11/2001 . will provide a small, two-bedroom, detached single family housing product that is in limited supply throughout the community. 8. Tentative Tract Map A seven lot tract map is proposed as part of the project consistent with the Master Plan of Development. The tract map has been conditioned by staff and the City Engineer to meet all City standards including street frontage improvements. The applicant will be required to record CC&R's for the map that will cover maintenance and access of common areas. 9. General Plan Consistency In staff's opinion the project is consistent with the goals and policies of the Land Use Element and the Housing Element. The project will provide a small lot, single-family dwelling that fulfills an important housing need within the community. The project has been designed with architectural and landscape elements that will be consistent with the scale and character of the surrounding neighborhood and the General Plan's appearance review manual. Proposed Environmental Determination Staff has prepared an initial study for the project in conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act. Based on the findings of the initial study, staff determined that the project does not have the potential to create any significant environmental impacts when mitigation measures are included. A Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared and posted for the project. The Council will take the final action on the environmental determination. Staff is recommending the Commission make a recommendation to the City Council to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. Conclusion • The proposed project is an attractive small lot residential project that will provide a housing product that is in short supply. • As a result of creative site planning, appears suited to the site and will provide a number of redeeming features. • It appears that all of the required findings for approval can be made. FISCAL IMPACT: The project would likely have a slight negative impact on City revenues. As a general rule, single-family dwellings require services that exceed the revenue generated by the dwelling. ALTERNATIVES 1. The City Council may approve with modifications to any part of the project. 2. The City Council may deny the project and the subdivision map. The parcel would retain its designation of Residential Multi-Family. 066 ITEM NUMBER: B-2 DATE: 12/11/2001 3. The City Council may refer the item back to the Planning Commission and/or staff for • additional analysis or modification. Direction on specific information or changes should be given to staff and the applicant. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1: Location Map, Zoning and General Plan Attachment 2 Draft Resolution of Approval Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration Attachment 3: Draft Ordinance Proposed Zoning Map Change Attachment 4: Draft Resolution of Approval Proposed Master Plan of Development Attachment 5: Draft Resolution of Approval Proposed Vesting Tentative Tract Map Attachment 6: Planning Commission Minutes • 067 ITEM NUMBER: B-2 DATE: 12/11/2001 • Attachment 1: Location Map, General Plan and Zoning P ject Location -� 5 Atascadero Avenue LDMF (Low Density Multi-Family) ' * > ing: RMF-10 �� , LOMB \\� FIDS��x, ,t.,.' 'ij "> i k, • 068 Attachment 2: Draft Resolution "A" • DRAFT RESOLUTION "A" A RESLUTION OF THE ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL CERTIFING PROPOSED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION 2001-0044 PREPARED FOR ZONE CHANGE 2001-0014, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2001- 0048 AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2001-0007 APN 030-201-001, 002 (6555 Atascadero Avenue/ Shores) WHEREAS, an application has been received from Jimmie D. Shores (PO Box 216, Atascadero, CA 93423) Applicant and Property Owner to consider a project consisting of a zone change from RMF-10 (Residential Multi-Family) to RMF-10 / PD-7 (Residential Multi- Family with Planned Development Overlay 97) with the adoption of a Master Plan of Development, and a seven lot residential Tentative Tract Map on APN 030-201-001, 002; and; WHEREAS, an Initial Study and Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration 2001- 0044 were prepared for the project and made available for public review in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero held a public hearing on Tuesday, November 6, 2001 following the close of the review period to consider the Initial Study and Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Atascadero held a public hearing on Tuesday, December 11, 2001 following the Planning Commission hearing to consider the Initial Study and Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration; and, NOW, THEREFORE, the Atascadero City Council certifies Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration 2001-0044 based on the following Findings as shown on Exhibit A: 1. The Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration has been completed in compliance with CEQA; and, 2. The Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was presented to the Planning Commission, and the information contained therein was considered by the Planning Commission, prior to recommending action on the project for which it was prepared; and, • 069 Resolution"A" December 11,2001 Page 2 of 3 • 3. The project does not have the potential to degrade the environment when mitigation measures are incorporated into the project. 4. The project will not achieve short-term to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals. 5. The project does not have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable. 6. The project will not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings either directly or indirectly. On motion by Council Member , and seconded by Council Member the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: • ABSENT: ADOPTED: By: J. Michael Arrambide, Mayor Attest: Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk Approved as to form: Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney • 070 Resolution"A" December 11,2001 Page 3 of 3 Exhibit A Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration • 2001-0044 sr RFL CITY OFATASCADERO AW e ' o PROPOSED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION #2001-0044 Applicant: Jim Shores, PO Box 216,Atascadero, CA 93423 Project Title: Atascadero Avenue Single Family Planned Development ZCH 2001-0014,CUP 2001-0048,TTM 2001-0007 Project 6555 Atascadero Avenue, Atascadero, CA 93422 Location: (San Luis Obispo County)APN 030-201-001, 002 Project The proposed project consists of an application for a zone change.conditional use permit(CUP)and Description: tentative tract map. The zone change request would establish a Planned Development#7 overlay on the site subject to a master plan of development(CUP)that would allow seven(7)single family residences to be constructed. The tentative tract map would create a seven(7)lot subdivision. The . project would be subject to architectural and landscape standards. The project site is a flat lot with one existing single family house and is adjacent to Atascadero Creek. General Plan Designation: LDMF(Low Density Multi-Family) Zoning District: RMF-10(Residential Multi-Family 10-bedrooms per acre) Findings: 1. The project does not have the potential to degrade the environment when mitigation measures are incorporated into the project. 2. The project will not achieve short-term to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals. 3. The project does not have impacts which are individually limited,but cumulatively considerable. 4. The project will not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings either directly or indirectly. Determination: Based on the above findings,and the information contained in the initial study 2001-0044(made a part hereof by reference and on file in the Community Development Department), it has been determined that the above project will not have an adverse impact on the environment when the following proposed mitigation measures are incorporated into the project(see attachment). Prepared By: Warren Frace, Planning Services iillanager Date Posted: October 17,2001 . Public Review Ends: November 6,2001 071 Attachment 3: Draft Ordinance S DRAFT ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO APPROVING ZONE CHANGE 2001-0014 AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP DESIGNATION OF APN 030-201-001 AND 002 FROM RMF-10 TO RMF-10 /PD-7. (6555 Atascadero Avenue/ Shores) WHEREAS, an application has been received from Jimmie D. Shores (PO Box 216, Atascadero, CA 93423) Applicant and Property Owner to consider a project consisting of a zone change from RMF-10 (Residential Multi-Family) to RMF-10 /PD-7 (Residential Multi- Family with Planned Development Overlay 47) with the adoption of a Master Plan of Development, and a seven lot residential tentative tract map on APN 030-201-001, 002; and, WHEREAS, the site's General Plan Designation is LDMF (Low Density Multi- Family; and, WHEREAS, the site's current zoning district is RMF-10 (Residential Multi-Family; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to enact this amendment to the Official Zoning Map to protect the health, safety and welfare of its citizens by applying orderly development of the City; and, WHEREAS, the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and public notice of environmental documents, as set forth in the State and local guidelines for implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) have been adhered to; and, WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed Public Hearing upon the subject Zone Change application was held by the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero at which hearing evidence, oral and documentary, was admitted on behalf of said Zoning amendments; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, at a duly noticed Public Hearing held on Tuesday,November 6, 2001, studied and considered Zone Change • 2001-0014, after first studying and considering the Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project recommended approval to the City Council, and, 072 Draft Ordinance December 11,2001 Page 2 of 4 WHEREAS, the City Council of Atascadero, at a duly noticed Public Hearing held • on Tuesday, December 11, 2001, studied and considered Zone Change 2001-0014, after first studying and considering the Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project, and, NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council takes the following actions: SECTION 1. Findings for Approval of a Zone Change to the Official Zoning Map of Atascadero Creating a PD-7 Planned Development Overlay District. The City Council finds as follows: 1. Modification of development standards or processing requirements is warranted to promote orderly and harmonious development. 2. Modification of development standards or processing requirements will enhance the opportunity to best utilize special characteristics of an area and will have a beneficial effect on the area. 3. Benefits derived from the overlay zone cannot be reasonably achieved through existing development standards or processing requirements. 4. Proposed plans offer certain redeeming features to compensate for the requested modification. SECTION 2. Approval The Atascadero City Council, in a regular session assembled on December 11, 2001, resolved introduce for first reading an ordinance amending the Official Zoning Map for the subject site consistent with the following: 1. Exhibit A: Zone Change Map SECTION 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective a 12:01 a.m. on the 31 Sc day after its final passage. 073 Draft Ordinance December 11,2001 Page 3 of 4 • On motion by Council Member , and seconded by Council Member the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ADOPTED: By: J. Michael Arrambide, Mayor Attest: Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk Approved as to form: Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney • L7 Draft Ordinance December 11,2001 Page 4 of 4 Exhibit A:Zone Change Map 2001-0014 . MML RMF-10 Official Zoning Map Change APN 030-201-001, 002 Existing Zone: RMF-10 ` Amended Zone: RMF-10 / PD-7 RMF -10 RSF-X RSF-X�� � RSF-X • t 775 Attachment 4: Draft Resolution 1113" • DRAFT RESOLUTION "B" A RESOLUTION ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL APPROVING A MASTER PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2001-0048) FOR A PD-7 OVERLAY ZONE OF APN 030-201-001 AND 002 (6555 Atascadero Avenue/ Shores) WHEREAS, an application has been received from Jimmie D. Shores (PO Box 216, Atascadero, CA 93423) Applicant and Property Owner to consider a project consisting of a Zone Change from RMF-10 (Residential Multi-Family) to RMF-10 / PD-7 (Residential Multi-Family with Planned Development Overlay #7) with the adoption of a Master Plan of Development, and a seven lot residential Tentative Tract Map on APN 030-201-001 and 002; and, • WHEREAS, the site's General Plan Designation is LDMF (Low Density Multi- Family; and, WHEREAS, the site's current zoning district is RMF-10 (Residential Multi-Family; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended that a site be rezoned to include a PD-7 overlay district which requires the adoption of a Master Plan of Development; and, WHEREAS, the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and public notice of environmental documents, as set forth in the State and local guidelines for implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) have been adhered to; and, WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed Public Hearing upon the subject Zone Change application was held by the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero at which hearing evidence, oral and documentary, was admitted on behalf of said Master Plan of Development; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, at a duly noticed Public Hearing held on Tuesday,November 6, 2001, studied and considered the Master Plan • of Development (CUP 2001-0048), after first studying and considering the Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project recommended approval of the project, and 076 Resolution"B" December 11,2001 Page 2 of 18 WHEREAS, the Atascadero City Council, at a duly noticed Public Hearing held on • Tuesday, December 11, 2001, studied and considered the Master Plan of Development (CUP 2001-0048), after first studying and considering the Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, and NOW, THEREFORE,the City Council takes the following actions: SECTION 1. Findings for Approval of Master Plan of Development. The City Council finds as follows: 1. The proposed project or use is consistent with the General Plan and the City's Appearance Review Manual; and, 2. The proposed project or use satisfies all applicable provisions of the Title (Zoning Ordinance) including the PD-7 Ordinance; and, 3. The establishment, and subsequent operation or conduct of the use will not, because of the circumstances and conditions applied in the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of the general public or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the use, or be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity of the use; and, 4. That the proposed project or use will not be inconsistent with the character or the immediate neighborhood or contrary to its orderly development; and, 5. That the proposed use or project will not generate a volume of traffic beyond the safe capacity of all roads providing access to the project, either existing or to be improved in conjunction with the project, or beyond the normal traffic volume of the surrounding neighborhood that would result from full development in accordance with the Land Use Element. SECTION 2. Approval. The Atascadero City Council, in a regular session assembled on December 11, 2001, approved the Master Plan of Development (CUP 2001- 0048) subject to the following: 1. EXHIBIT A: Conditions of Approval /Mitigation Monitoring Program 2. EXHIBIT B: Site Plan 3. EXHIBIT C: Statistical Summary of Project 4. EXHIBIT D: Landscape Plan 5. EXHIBIT E: Grading and Drainage Plan 6. EXHIBIT F: Utility Plan 7. EXHIBIT G: Elevations and Floor Plans 8. EXHIBIT H: Exterior Colors and Materials 9. EXHIBIT I: Arborist Report • 77 Resolution"B" December 11,2001 Page 3 of 18 • On motion by Council Member , and seconded by Council Member the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ADOPTED: By: J. Michael Arrambide, Mayor Attest: • Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk Approved as to form: Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney 078 Resolution"B" December 11,2001 Page 4 of 18 EXHIBIT A:Conditions of Approval/Mitigation Monitoring Program • PD-7 Master Plan of Development(CUP 2001-0048) Conditions of Approval/ Timing Responsibility Mitigation Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure PS:Planning Services BL Business License BS:Building Services 6555 Atascadero Avenue GP:Grading Permit FD:Fire Deparfiient BP:Building Perrtrt PD:Police Department PD-7 Master Plan of Development Fl:Final Inspection CE:City Engineer CUP 2001-0048 Fo:Fnal Occupancernporary y ancy CA City Attorney Planning Services 1. The approval of this use permit shall become final and PS effective following the end of the referendum period for Zone Change 2001-0014. 2. Approval of this Master Plan of Development shall be valid FM PS concurrently with the life of Tentative Tract Map 2001- 0007 and then indefinitely following final map. The Master Plan of Development approval shall expire and become null and void unless a final map is recorded consistent with the Master Plan of Development. • 3. Changes to the Master Plan of Development shall be On-going PS approved by the Planning Commission and do not require Council action. 4. The Community Development Department shall have the BP/FM PS authority to approve the following minor changes to the project the(1)modify the site plan project by less than 10%,(2) result in a superior site design or appearance, and/or(3)address a construction design issue that is not substantive to the Master Plan of Development. The Planning Commission shall have the final authority to approve any other changes to the Master Plan of Development and any associated Tentative Maps. 5. All subsequent Tentative Tract Maps and construction BP/FM PS permits shall be consistent with the Master Plan of Development contained herein. 6. All exterior elevations,finish materials and colors shall be BP PS consistent with the Master Plan of Development as shown in EXHIBIT IS and EXHIBIT H with the following modifications. a. Minimum 5-foot setback required from leading edge of column to garage. b. Wood siding and masonry base treatment required along all street and driveway frontages. A 2-foot • material return is required at all corners. 079 Resolution'B" December 11,2001 Page 5 of 18 • Conditions of Approval/ Timing Responsibility Mitigation Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure PS:Planning Services BL:Business License BS:Budding Semen 6555 Atascadero Avenue GP GradingPemrit FD:ReDeparhnent 8P Budding Pem t PD:Police Department PD-7 Master Plan of Development Fl:Final Inspection CE City Engineer TO:Tenoway VM:Wastewabar CUP 2001-0048 Fa.Final Occupancy Occupancr CA citynt-q 7. All site development shall be consistent with the maximum BP/FM PS intensities described in the statistical project summary as shown on EXHIBIT C. 8. All site work,grading and site improvements shall be BP/FM PS consistent with the Master Plan of Development as shown in EXHIBIT B, EXHIBIT E and EXHIBIT F. 9. Native oaks trees shall be preserved and protected during BP PS construction unless approved for removal. Prior to permit issuance,a Tree Protection Plan shall be prepared for the project by a certified arborist and approved by Planning Services. Tree protection shall be in place prior to the issuance of any construction permits and the arborist shall be under contract to monitor tree protection. 10. A final landscape and irrigation plan shall be approved BP PS prior to the issuance of building permits and included as • part of site improvement plan consistent with EXHIBIT D. All exterior meters,air conditioning units and mechanical equipment shall be screened with landscape material. The landscape plan shall be consistent with all applicable mitigation measures include 4.b.2. 11. All project fencing shall be installed consistent with BP PS EXHIBIT D subject to the following modifications. a. The yards adjacent to Atascadero Avenue shall be not be enclosed with any fencing which exceeds 3- feet in height. b. No fences in the rear yards adjoining Atascadero Creek shall exceed 3-feet in height. c. The design of the all fencing shall be compatible with the overall project design. 12. A 6-foot wide pedestrian access shall be dedicated to the GP PS Q&easeFneR with a 4-foot wide decomposed granite BP walking pathway shall be provided along the entire FM property line fronting Atascadero Creek. Mitigation Measures 13. The project shall comply with all applicable District GP PS 3.b.1 regulations pertaining to the control of fugitive dust(PM- 10)as contained in section 6.4 of Air Quality Handbook. All site grading and demolition plans notes shall list the C?80 Resolution"B" December 11,2001 Page 6 of 18 Conditions of Approval/ 'riming Responsibility Mitigation • Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure PS:Planning Sery as BL Business license BS:Building services 6555 Atascadero Avenue GP:Grading Pemit FD:Fee Departrnent BP Building Pemit PD:Police DepatrneM PD-7 Master Plan of Development R:FinallnspecOon CE:CityEngneer TO:Tertporay Occupancy M Wastewater CUP 2001-0048 FO:Final Occupancy CA Cty At imey following regulations: a. All material excavated or graded shall be sufficiently watered to prevent excessive amounts of dust. Watering shall occur at least twice daily with complete coverage,preferably in the late morning and after work is finished for the day. b. All clearing, grading,earth moving, or excavation activities shall cease during periods of high winds (i.e. greater than 20 mph averaged over one hour) so as to prevent excessive amounts of dust. c. All material transported off-site shall be either sufficiently watered or securely covered to prevent excessive amounts of dust. d. The area disturbed by clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation operations shall be minimized so as to prevent excessive amounts of dust. e. Permanent dust control measured identified in the approved project revegetation and landscape plans shall be implemented as soon as possible following completion of any soil disturbing activities. • f. Exposed ground areas that are planned to be reworked at dates greater than one month after initial grading shall be sown with fast-germinating native grass seed and watered until vegetation becomes established. g. All disturbed areas not subject to revegetation shall be stabilized using approved chemical soil binders, jute netting, or other methods in advance by the APCD. h. All roadways, driveways,sidewalks, etc.to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible. In addition, structural foundations shall be completed as soon as possible following building pad construction. i. On-site vehicle speed shall be limited to 15 mph for any unpaved surface. j. All unpaved areas with vehicle traffic shall be watered at least twice per day, using non-potable water. k. Streets adjacent to the project site shall be swept daily to remove silt which may have accumulated from construction activities so as to prevent excessive amounts of dust from leaving the site. I. Wheel washers may be required when significant offsite import or export of fill is involved. 14. No additional fill shall be added at the rear of lots 1 and GP PS 4.1b.1. 4. •15. The rear yards of lots 1 and 4 shall be landscaped with BP PS 4.b.2. native plants that are compatible with the creek 081 Resolution"B" December 11,2001 Page 7 of 18 • Conditions of Approval/ Timing Responsibility Mitigation Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure PS:Planning services BL:Business License BS:Building Services 6555 Atascadero Avenue GP:Grading Permit FD:FireDepartrnent BP:Building Permit PD:Police Department PD-7 Master Plan of Development Fl:Final inspection CE:City Engineer TO:Tertporary Occupancy WW:Wastewater CUP 2001-0048 FO:Final occupancy Ca Cay Adorney environment inste.adl ef turf Turf areas shall be limited to 50%of the rear yards of lots 1 and 4. 16. Habitat protection fencing with silt barriers shall be GP PS 4.b.3. installed along the edge of the creek reservation prior to issuance of building permits. 17. All tree protection measures and tree removals shall be GP PS 4.e.1. consistent with the recommendations of a certified arborist as shown in Exhibit I. 18. Native tree removals shall be mitigated according the to GP PS 4.e.2. the following table. The mitigation shall be in the form of on-site tree replanting. The majority of the replacement oak trees shall be planted along and within the creek reservation. Evergreen Native Trees(inches) Deciduous Native Trees(inches) Totals dbh notes dbh notes 1 4-inches live oak 1 14-inches white oak • 2 2 8-inches white oak 3 3 5-inches white oak 4 4 7-inches white oak 5 5 5-inches white oak 6 7-inches white oak 7 4-inches white oak 6 8 8-inches white oak Total 4-inches Total 58-inches 62-inches Mitigation Requirement req'd tree replacements: 1 five gal trees req'd tree replacements: 19 five gal trees 20 five gal trees Proposed Replanting 0 five gal trees Proposed Replanting 0 five gal trees 0 five gal trees 0 box trees(24") 0 box trees(24") 0 box trees(24") Remaining Mitigation 1 five gal trees Remaining Mitigation 19 five gal trees 20 five gal trees 19. In the event of the accidental discovery or recognition of GP PS 5.b.1. human remains in any location the following actions shall BP be taken: a. There shall be no further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent human remains until: b. The San Luis Obispo County Coroner is contacted to determine that no investigation of the cause of death is required, and . c. If the coroner identifies the remains to be native American, the coroner shall contact the Native American Heritage Commission. The Native Resolution"B" December 11,2001 Page 8 of 18 Conditions of Approval/ Timing Responsibility Mitigation . Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure PS:Planning Services BL Business License BS:Bung Services 6555 Atascadero Avenue GR.Grading Pem,it FD:Fre Depaitnent BP:Building Pemrt PD:Police Department PD-7 Master Plan of Development F:Finallnspection cecityEngineer TO:Temporary Occupancy W wastewater CUP 2001-0048 FO:Final Occupancy CPak Aftw" American Heritage Commission shall identify the person or persons it believes to be the most likely descended from the deceased native American. The most likely descendent may make recommendations to the landowner or the person responsible for the excavation work, for means of treating or disposing of, with appropriate dignity, the human remains and any associates grave goods as provided in Public Resources Code Section 5097.98, or Where the following conditions occur,the landowner or his authorized representative shall rebury the Native American human remains and associated grave goods with appropriate dignity on the property in a location not subject to further disturbance. a. The Native American Heritage Commission is unable to identify a most likely descendent or the most likely descendent failed to make a recommendation within 24 hours of being notified by the commission b. The descendant identified fails to make a recommendation; or • c. The landowner or his authorized representative rejects the recommendation of the descendant and the mediation by the Native American Commission fails to provide measures acceptable to the landowner. 20. In the event archeological resources are unearthed or GP PS 5.b.2. discovered during any construction activities,the BP following standards apply: a. Construction activities shall cease and the Planning Department shall be notified so that the extent and location of discovered materials may be recorded by a qualified archeologist and disposition of artifacts may be accomplished in accordance with state and federal law. 21. The storm water filtration and detention basin shall be GP PS 8.a.1. designed and installed maintain historic off-site peak BP flows and filter sedimentation and pollutants prior to release into the creek. 22. All residential dwellings shall be constructed a minimum GP PS. 8.g.1 of 1-foot above the 100-year flood plain. Certified pad BP elevations shall be submitted to the Building Department for approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 083 Resolution"B" December 11,2001 Page 9 of 18 • Conditions of Approval/ Timing Responsibility Mitigation Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure PS:Planning Suvices BL Business License BS:Budding Services 6555 Atascadero Avenue GP:Grarg PaTnk FD:Fie Department OR Building Panit PD:Police Departrnent PD-7 Master Plan of Development Fl:Fnallnspeclion CE CityEngirw;er TO:Temporary Occupancy WW:Wastwaler CUP 2001-0048 FO:Final Occupancy Ca CityAtmmey Fire Marshal 23. All common driveway shall be marked with red curbs and BP FM no parking signage as required by the Fire Marshal. 24. Each dwelling shall have an approved lighted address BP FM sign attached to the structure. • 084 Resolution"B" December 11,2001 Page 10 of 18 EXHIBIT B:Site Plan • Creekside Pathway 4-foot decomposed -- ,�—•� - '.�J '_ ^�` •'i • ,yam I t�J■ 4 __.' ± granite path i N Sedimentation basin 11 > � III,• - m< t I I r 1I 8 I ' l a a j fita h.' till t — t SANTA , �il�il� � I I •� 1 ,—I 1 I -- � 085 Resolution"B" December 11,2001 Page 11 of 18 • EXHIBIT Q Statistical Summary of Project Proposed Project Summary sip } � # yi�f Lot Area 5073 sf 5754 sf 5380 sf 7916 sf 5225 sf 5000 sf 9558 sf Building Footprint 1509 sf 1509 sf 1509 sf 1509 sf 1509 sf 1509 sf 2000 sf (not to exceed 35%) 30% 26% 28% 19% 29% 30% 21% Landscaped Area 2630 sf 2796 sf 2190 sf 5060 sf 2920 sf 2929 sf 5500 sf (minimum 40%) 52% 49% 41% 64% 56% 59% 58% Covered Parking 2 spaces 2 spaces 2 spaces 2 spaces 2 spaces 2 spaces 2 spaces Guest Parking 2 spaces 2 spaces 2 spaces 2 spaces 1 2 spaces 2 spaces 2 spaces • r 086 Resolution"B" December 11,2001 Page 12 of 18 EXHIBIT D: Landscape PlanOf . `7 a�IR}5r8 d}Ci�v ¢ 5G 4 :j•i Ufa A s ii 11-1 I� i Ip3 } a n } A �ss ^` iag " `g`� Native p,tants and f 'Ry9 �yy q oak tree replacement }Y along creek frontage. f I "% e ILII f �1$10 ' pn€ � i�11 € Nft { \ r ! 4 a2 4 Kura-I� �� a � �£ef( �♦ i _ �� � f tt' c _ y"yf�a� t �=Iti�� 4 `$ r( Yle d �t3. a B 114(fI r; Z • .ii > l��Zi Fy� � 't r Z I a: tis cx t 1 0 F f !l t �' ti, i r— i LANDiO'APQ PLAN I WTD ti!A-�ATMCA0o10 COUM'y C.JP RROOUCT10NSl c ('� i ATAa0AD6RO. CA. 037 Resolution"B" December 11,2001 Page 13 of 18 • EXHIBIT E:Grading and Drainage Plan —z viers Jv 41 - E � Z , 1 ""`•�. '` at:_r., � r � 1 �• it i t��;# s A' i No fill pads allowed for yards and building , A foundations. ;V x;11 I [ 1 t f ' 088 Resolution"B" December 11,2001 Page 14 of 18 EXHIBIT F: Conceptual Utility Plan • H �.�- i•'_' � 1.� � w � t �,� a is � o e• 1 r t 1 I `t tv I � ALA Us it h I ' I � 'T 1, T V'�� ��. ' '' 1 3 :�1 •., �� Iltl>Iw -:�;Y'ri tz JT- 039 „ fir, '� 'GSA r rY•rY � !er'�`r r/%i�a�'� .r'"r �•� r �, �'`�~ �"r t;i 3 ,s4`✓?' iF s`T�,, �. � �,. '..G.�„ �”, ,�,{��` ,DQE ,` i ° � Ss?s,'�` � •r.r r / K•.� 'C. ti .^ , 1 �y to ky ,r 4yfi 4`� i �• '' I Resolution"B" December 11,2001 Page 15 of 18 • EXHIBIT G: ELEVATIONS AND FLOOR PLANS r' q8q i Minimum 5-foot setback required 1 — ,Ik Yl� E from leading edge 9 of column to garage. Ig � s 9FT �x 4i:j i � C< Y F I e i 5 t P Wood siding and } masonry base 4i- treatment I Q r ; 3 treatment required along all street and driveway frontages. A 2- foot material f �;' il, return is required at all corners. 090 Resolution"Br' December 11,2001 Page 16 of 18 EXHIBIT H: EXTERIOR COLORS AND MATERIALS PALETTE • 'ARCHITECTURAL SERIES' �� rI ASPHALT COMP4)SITION SHU%gS V s� f UNITS 'A' AND ,'C' UNITS 'B' AND V. M� X-55 FRENCH VANILLA(BASE 100) X-97 PACIFIC SAND(BASE 200)'m BODY(STUCCO AND SIDING). � I i�i�' ��h14e� BODY(STUCCO AND SIDING)s TRIM,AND CONTRAST COLORS �€ TRIM AND CONTRAST COLORS t 'RIVER ROCK`.CULTURED STONE VENEER-PER ELEVATIONS • 091 Resolution"B" December 11,2001 Page 17 of 18 EXHIBIT 1:ARBORIST REPORT CALIFORNIA93446 805 239.3742 239-1239 FAX 805 PASO ROBt1:5 / / 802 PASO ROBLES STREET , ARBOR RECEIVE® TREE SURGERY NOV 3 i 2001 August 9.2001 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT To Whom It May Concern: This report is in regards to the new construction planned for the northeastern comer of Atascadero avenue and Santa Ynez avenue in the city of Atascadero,lot 1&2 block A- B Atascadero Colony. All statements made in this report are in regards to oak trees that may be impacted from construction. • After reviewing the property and site plan several mitigation measures must be followed to insure minimal damage to the trees. 1. Fencing: Must be a minimum of 4' high, chain link.snow or safety fence, staked at the drip-line or line of encroachment for each tree or group of trees. Fence must be up before any construction or earth moving begins. For areas where this is not possible,aeration of the soil (after development is complete) shall be required. 2. Soil Aeration Methods: Soils under the drip-lines that have been compacted by heavy equipment and/or construction activities must be returned to their original state before all work is completed. Methods include water jetting., adding organic matter,boring small holes with an auger(18"deep.2-3'apart with a—24"auger)and moderate amounts of nitrogen fertilizer applied. 3. Chin Mulch: All areas (under the drip-lines of the trees) to be cut and all areas that cannot be fenced shall receive a 4-6"deep layer of chip mulch to retain moisture,soil structure and reduce the affects of compaction. 4. Trenching within the Dritrline: All trenching done under the drip-tines of trees shall be hand-dug,augured or bored,and all roots larger then one inch must be cleanly cut by someone who is trained in root pruning with proper hand tools. Wet burlap must be placed over any exposed roots until the trench is refilled. Backhoe operator need to pay special attention to not injure any roots. 5. Grading with the Drip-Line: Grading in excess of 1' in depth shall not encroach within the following setback areas of the trees: Trunk Diameter Set-back for Grading 4„-17” 5' 13'=24 10' 24'-36 15' 37"and larger 20' 6. Pruning Within the Drip-line: All pruning shall be done according to adopted • 15A standards. 092 Resolution"B" December 11,2001 Page 18 of 18 • 802 PASO ROBLES STREET PASO ROBLES,CALIFORNIA 93446 805/23971239 FAX 805/239-3742 ARBOR TREE SURGERY 7. Paving Within the Drip-Line: Porous pavers("turfblock",brick,ect.May be required under the drip-lines unless paving area affects less than 25%of the drip-line. 8. Landscaving Within the Drip-Line: Landscape planes for any proposed plantings under the drip-line are required. It is the intent to discourage any planting that requires irrigation,as this practice has been know to kill mature native trees. Planting of drought tolerant species is encouraged. A replacement prugram for the removed trees will need to be made. See attached copy of Atascadero's Tree Standards and Guidelines,chapter 8. Special care needs to be made to trees not on the site but where their drip-line encroaches the site,one south east of parcel 6 and one north of parcel 5,the above mitigation plan is the same for these trees. . Sincerely, Steven G.Alvarez,Certified Arborist 40511 Arbor Tree Service • 093 Attachment 5: Draft Resolution °°C:°f • DRAFT RESOLUTION "C" A RESOLUTION ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL APPROVING VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2001-0007, A SEVEN LOT MAP CONSISTENT WITH A PD-7 OVERLAY ZONE OF APN 030-201-001 AND 002 (6555 Atascadero Avenue/ Shores) WHEREAS, an application has been received from Jimmie D. Shores (PO Box 216, Atascadero, CA 93423) Applicant and Property Owner to consider a project consisting of a Zone Change from RMF-10 (Residential Multi-Family) to RMF-10 / PD-7 (Residential Multi-Family with Planned Development Overlay #7) with the adoption of a Master Plan of Development, and a seven lot residential Tentative Tract Map on APN 030-201-001 and 002; • and, WHEREAS, the site's General Plan Designation is LDMF (Low Density Multi- Family; and, WHEREAS, the site's current zoning district is RMF-10 (Residential Multi-Family; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended that a site be rezoned to include a PD-7 overlay with a Master Plan of Development thereby allowing a seven lot subdivision of the site; and, WHEREAS, the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and public notice of environmental documents,as set forth in the State and local guidelines for implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) have been adhered to; and, WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed Public Hearing upon the subject Tentative Tract Map application was held by the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero at which hearing evidence, oral and documentary, was admitted on behalf of said application; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, at a duly noticed Public Hearing held on November 6, 2001, studied and considered Tentative Tract Map 2001-0007, after first studying and considering the Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project and recommended approval; and, 094 Resolution"C" December 11,2001 Page 2 of 15 WHEREAS the Atascadero Cit Council at a duly noticed Public Hearin held on Y Y g • December 11, 2001, studied and considered Tentative Tract Map 2001-0007, after first studying and considering the Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project; and, NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council takes the following actions: Section 1. Findings of Approval for Tentative Tract Man, the City Council of the City of Atascadero finds as follows: 1. The proposed subdivision, as conditioned, is consistent with the General Plan and applicable zoning requirements. 2. The design and improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan and applicable zoning requirements. 3. The proposed subdivision, as conditioned, is consistent with the proposed Planned Development Overlay District#7 Master Plan of Development (CUP 2001-0048). 4. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. 5. The site is physically suitable for the density of development proposed. 6. The design and improvement of the proposed subdivision will not cause • substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish and wildlife or their habitat. 7. The design of the subdivision will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through, or the use of property within, the proposed subdivision; or substantially equivalent alternative easements are provided. 8. The design of the subdivision will provide easements for public access along a public waterway know as Atascadero Creek. 9. The proposed subdivision design and type of improvements proposed will not be detrimental to the health, safety or welfare of the general public. SECTION 2. Approval. The Atascadero City Council, in a regular session assembled on December 112001, resolved to approve Vesting Tentative Tract Map (TTM 2001-0007) subject to the following: 1. Exhibit A: Vesting Tentative Tract Map 2001-0007 2. Exhibit B: Conditions of Approval/Mitigation Monitoring Program. 3. Exhibit C: Sidewalk Detail 4. Exhibit D: Arborist Report 095 Resolution"C" December 11,2001 Page 3 of 15 • On motion b Council Member and seconded onded by Council Member the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ADOPTED: By: J. Michael Arrambide, Mayor Attest: Marcia McClure Tor erson Cit Clerk g y Approved as to form: Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney 096 Resolution"C" December 11,2001 Page 4 of 15 Exhibit A:Vesting Tentative Tract Map 2001-0007 . WON �<'3 5titi1lE flit Q sJ� ill ' >n i - �- � `•n3nv feu r= ,......T � i��7�1 � r � r i i 097 Resolution"C" December 11,2001 Page 5 of 15 • Exhibit B: Conditions Of Approval/Mitigation Monitoring Program Conditions of Approval/ Timing Responsibility Mitigation Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure GP:Grading Perm t PS:Planning Services BP.Building Pernit BS:Building Services 6555 Atascadero Avenue SIP Subdivision FD:Fire Department Improvement Plans PD:Police Department Vesting Tentative Tract Map FM:Final Map CE:City Engineer Tcl.Temporary Occupancy WW:Wastewater TTM 2001-0007 A:Finalinspenon CA.City AWmey FO Final Occupancy AMWC:Water Comp. Planning Services 1. The approval of this Tentative Tract Map shall not become FM PS final and effective until the end of the referendum period for Zone Change 2001-0014. 2. Approval of this Tentative Tract Map shall be valid for two FM PS years after its effective date. At the end of the period, the approval shall expire and become null and void unless an extension of time is granted pursuant to a written request received prior to the expiration date. 3. The Community Development Department shall have the FM PS authority to approve minor changes to the project that (1) result in a superior site design or appearance, and/or (2) • address a design issue that is not substantive to the Tentative Tract Map and that the Final Map is in substantial conformance with the Tentative Map. 4. The Tract Map shall be subject to additional fees for park or FM PS recreation purposes (QUIMBY Act) as required by City Ordinance. 5. The applicant shall record CC&R's for the subdivision FM subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer, City Attorney and Planning Services. The CC&R's shall identify the maintenance responsibilities of all private driveways, sewer facilities, drainage facilities, common parking areas, site lighting, landscape areas, fencing, and other common facilities. The CC&R's shall also state that each unit shall have no more than two bedrooms and that all exterior colors, exterior materials, and yard fencing shall be consistent with the overall master plan of development. 6. The granting of this entitlement shall apply to the property On going PS located at 6555 Atascadero Avenue (APN 030-201-001 and APN 030-201-002)regardless of owner. 7. The Final Map shall be drawn in substantial conformance FM PS with the approved tentative map, and in compliance with all conditions set forth herein,shall be submitted for review and approval in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City's Subdivision Ordinance. • 8. The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Atascadero or its agents,officers,and employees against any claim or action brought to challenge an approval 098 Resolution"C" December 11,2001 Page 6 of 15 Conditions of Approval/ riming Responsibility Mitigation . Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure GP:Grading Permit PS:Planning Services BP Building Permit BS:Building Services 6555 Atascadero Avenue SIP.Subdivision FD:FireDepanmerrt Improvement Plans PD:Police Department Vesting Tentative Tract Map FM:Final Map CE CityEngineer TO:Temporary Occupancy WW:Wastevrat r TTM 2001-0007 FI:Final inspection CA City Attorney F0:Final Occupancy AMWC:Water Comp. by the city,or any of its entities,conceming the subdivision. Mitigation Measures 9. The project shall comply with all applicable District GP PS 3.b.1 regulations pertaining to the control of fugitive dust(PM- 10)as contained in section 6.4 of Air Quality Handbook. All site grading and demolition plans notes shall list the following regulations: a. All material excavated or graded shall be sufficiently watered to prevent excessive amounts of dust. Watering shall occur at least twice daily with complete coverage, preferably in the late morning and after work is finished for the day. b. All clearing,grading,earth moving,or excavation activities shall cease during periods of high winds (i.e. greater than 20 mph averaged over one hour) so as to prevent excessive amounts of dust. c. All material transported off-site shall be either sufficiently watered or securely covered to prevent • excessive amounts of dust. d. The area disturbed by clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation operations shall be minimized so as to prevent excessive amounts of dust. e. Permanent dust control measured identified in the approved project revegetation and landscape plans shall be implemented as soon as possible following completion of any soil disturbing activities. f. Exposed ground areas that are planned to be reworked at dates greater than one month after initial grading shall be sown with fast-germinating native grass seed and watered until vegetation becomes established. g. All disturbed areas not subject to revegetation shall be stabilized using approved chemical soil binders, jute netting, or other methods in advance by the APCD. h. All roadways,driveways, sidewalks, etc.to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible. In addition, structural foundations shall be completed as soon as possible following building pad construction. i. On-site vehicle speed shall be limited to 15 mph for any unpaved surface. j. All unpaved areas with vehicle traffic shall be watered at least twice per day, using non-potable water. k. Streets adjacent to the project site shall be swept • daily to remove silt which may have accumulated from construction activities so as to prevent excessive amounts of dust from leaving the site. 099 Resolution"C" December 11,2001 Page 7 of 15 • Conditions of Approval/ Timing Responsibility Mitigation Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure GP:Grading Pwrit PS:Planning Sa es BP Building Permit BS:Budding Services 6555 Atascadero Avenue SIP:Subdivision FD:Fire Department Improvement Plans PD:Police Department Vesting Tentative Tract Map FM:Final Map CE City Engineer TO:Temporary Occupancy WW:Wastewater TTM 2001-0007 FI:Enol inspection CA City Attorney F0:Final Occupancy AMWC:Wafer Cone. I. Wheel washers may be required when significant offsite import or export of fill is involved. 10. No additional fill shall be added at the rear of lots 1 and 4. GP PS 4.1b.1. 11. The rear yards of lots 1 and 4 shall be landscaped with BP PS 4.b.2. native plants that are compatible with the creek environment . Turf areas shall be limited to 50% of the rear yards of lots 1 and 4 12. Habitat protection fencing with silt barriers shall be GP PS 4.b.3. installed along the edge of the creek reservation prior to issuance of building permits. 13. All tree protection measures and tree removals shall be GP PS 4.e.1. consistent with the recommendations of a certified arborist as shown in Exhibit D. 14. Native tree removals shall be mitigated according the to GP PS 4.e.2. . the following table. The mitigation shall be in the form of on-site tree replanting. The majority of the replacement oak trees shall be planted along and within the creek reservation. Evergreen Native Trees(inches) Deciduous Native Trees(inches) Totals dbh notes dbh notes 1 4-inches live oak 1 14-inches white oak 2 2 8-inches white oak 3 3 5-inches white oak 4 4 7-inches white oak 5 5 5-inches white oak 6 7-inches white oak 7 4-inches white oak 6 8 8-inches white oak Total 4-inches Total 58-inches 62-inches Mitigation Requirement req'd tree replacements: 1 five gal trees req'd tree replacements: 19 five gal trees 20 five gal trees Proposed Replanting 0 five gal trees Proposed Replanting 0 five gal trees 0 five gal trees 0 box trees(24") 0 box trees(24") 0 box trees(24") Remaining Mitigation 1 five gal trees Remaining Mitigation 19 five gal trees 20 five gal trees 15. In the event of the accidental discovery or recognition of GP PS 5.b.1. • human remains in any location the following actions shall be BP taken: Resolution"C" December 11,2001 Page 8 of 15 Conditions of Approval/ Timing Responsibility Mitigation • Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure GP:Grading Permit PS:Planning Services BP:Building Pemit BS:Building Services 6555 Atascadero Avenue SIP:Subdivision FD:FieDepartrnent ImprovementPlans PD:PoliceDepatnent Vesting Tentative Tract Map FM:Final Map CE City Engineer TTM 2001-0007 TO,TemporayOccupar,cy WW:Wastewater Fl:Final inspecton CA City Attorney F0:Final Occupancy AMWC:Water Comp. a. There shall be no further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent human remains until: b. The San Luis Obispo County Coroner is contacted to determine that no investigation of the cause of death is required, and c. If the coroner identifies the remains to be native American, the coroner shall contact the Native American Heritage Commission. The Native American Heritage Commission shall identify the person or persons it believes to be the most likely descended from the deceased native American. The most likely descendent may make recommendations to the landowner or the person responsible for the excavation work, for means of treating or disposing of, with appropriate dignity, the human remains and any associates grave goods as provided in Public Resources Code Section 5097.98, or Where the following conditions occur,the landowner or his authorized representative shall rebury the Native American human remains and associated grave goods with appropriate dignity on the property in a location not subject to further disturbance. a. The Native American Heritage Commission is unable to identify a most likely descendent or the most likely descendent failed to make a recommendation within 24 hours of being notified by the commission b. The descendant identified fails to make a recommendation; or C.The landowner or his authorized representative rejects the recommendation of the descendant and the mediation by the Native American Commission fails to provide measures acceptable to the landowner. 16. In the event archeological resources are unearthed or GP PS 5.b.2. discovered during any construction activities,the following BP standards apply: b. Construction activities shall cease and the Planning Department shall be notified so that the extent and location of discovered materials may be recorded by a qualified archeologist and disposition of artifacts may be accomplished in accordance with state and federal law. 17. The storm water filtration and detention basin shall be GP PS 8.a.1. designed and installed maintain historic off-site peak flows BP and filter sedimentation and pollutants prior to release into the creek. • 101 Resolution"C" December 11,2001 Page 9 of 15 • Conditions of Approval/ Timing Responsibility Mitigation Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure GP:Grading Permit PS:Planning Services BP:Building Permit BS:Budding Services 6555 Atascadero Avenue SIP:Subdivision FD:Fire Department Improvement Plans PD:Police Department Vesting Tentative Tract Map FM:Final Map CE:City Engineer TO:Temporary Occupancy WW:Wastewater TTM 2001-0007 FI:Final inspection CA CityAbomey F0:Final Occupancy AMWC:Water Comp. 18. All residential dwellings shall be constructed a minimum of GP PS. 8.g.1 1-foot above the 100-year flood plain. Certified pad BP elevations shall be submitted to the Building Department for approval prior to the issuance of building permits. City Engineer Site Specific Conditions 19. The applicant shall indicate project benchmark and basis of elevation prior to grading and drainage approval. 20. The applicant shall provide evidence that the 6-inch culvert under the private drive is sufficient to convey the flood waters prior to grading and drainage approval. 21. The applicant shall address how storm water will be conveyed from the end of the new gutter on Atascadero Avenue to Atascadero Creek prior to grading and drainage approval. 22. The applicant shall address stormwater detention prior to grading and drainage approval. City Engineer Standard Conditions 22. In the event that the applicant chooses to bond for the public FM CE improvements required as a condition of this map, the applicant shall enter into a Subdivision Improvement Agreement with the City Council. Applicant shall have a period of one year from the date of the recordation of the final map in which to complete the improvements required as a condition of this subdivision. 23. An engineer's estimate of probable cost shall be submitted FM CE for review and approval by the City Engineer to determine the amount of the bond. 24. The Subdivision Improvement Agreement shall be accepted FM CE by City Council on the consent agenda with the map and record concurrently with the Final Map. 25. All public improvements shall be constructed in conformance FM CE with the City of Atascadero Engineering Department Standard Specifications and Drawings or as directed by the City Engineer. The design of the frontage sidewalk on Atascadero Avenue will be reviewed for pedestrian safety at the bridge crossing point and for consistency with the rural character of the neighborhood as shown on Exhibit C. 26. A six(6)foot Public Utility Easement(PUE)contiguous to all FM CE street frontages shall be offered for dedication on the Tract Map. • 27. The applicant shall enter into a Plan Check/Inspection BP CE Resolution"C" December 11,2001 Page 10 of 15 Conditions of Approval/ Timing Responsibility Mitigation • Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure GP:Gradng Penn@ PS:Planning Services BP:Building Penrd BS:Building Services 6555 Atascadero Avenue SIP:Subchision FD:FireDepaitnent VestingTentative Tract Ma l M:Final Mapent tans PD:Police ginDeprtrnent P FM:Final Map CE:City Engineer TO:remponaryOccupancy WW:Waste� TTM 2001-0007 FI:Final inspeLton Ca:Citynanxney F0:Final Occupancy AMWC:Water Comp. agreement with the City. 28. The applicant shall be responsible for the relocation and/or BP CE alteration of existing utilities. 29. Drainage shall cross lot lines only where a drainage BP CE easement has been provided. Drainage from off-site areas shall be conveyed across the project site in drainage easements. 30. The applicant shall install all new utilities (water, gas, BP CE electric, cable TV and telephone) underground. Utilities shall be extended to the property line frontage of each lot or its public utility easement 31. The applicant shall monument all property corners for Ongoing CE construction control and shall promptly replace them if disturbed. 32. A preliminary subdivision guarantee shall be submitted for FM CE • review in conjunction with the processing of the parcel map. 33. All existing and proposed utility, pipeline, open space, or FM CE other easements are to be shown on the parcel map. If there are building or other restrictions related to the easements, they shall be noted on the parcel map. 34. Prior to recording the parcel map, the applicant shall submit FM CE a map drawn in substantial conformance with the approved tentative map and in compliance with all conditions set forth herein shall be submitted for review and approval by the City in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City's Subdivision Ordinance. 35. Prior to recording the parcel map, the applicant shall set FM CE monuments at all new property corners and a registered civil engineer or licensed land surveyor shall indicate, by certificate on the final map, that corners have been set or shall be set by a date specific and that they will be sufficient to enable the survey to be retraced. 36. Prior to the map being placed on the agenda for City Council FM CE acceptance,the map shall be signed by the City Engineer. 37. Prior to recording the parcel map, the applicant shall pay all FM CE outstanding plan check/inspection fees. 38. Prior to placing the final map on the agenda for City Council FM CE approval, the applicant shall have the map reviewed by all • applicable public and private utility companies (cable, telephone, gas, electric, Atascadero Mutual Water Resolution"C" December 11,2001 Page 11 of 15 • Conditions of Approval/ Timing Responsibility Mitigation Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure GP:Grading Pemtit PS:Planning Services BPI.Building Penn( BS:Building Services 6555 Atascadero Avenue SIP:Subdivision FD:FireDeparlment Improvement Plans PD:Police Department Vesting Tentative Tract Map FM:Final Map CE City Engineer TO:Temporary Occupancy WW Wastewater TTM 2001-0007 FI:Final inspecton CA:City Momey FO:Final Occupancy AMWC:Water Comp, Company). The applicant shall obtain a letter from each utility company which indicates their review of the map. The letter shall identify any new easements which may be required by the utility company. A copy of the letter shall be submitted to the City. New easements shall be shown on the parcel map. 39. Upon recording the parcel map, the applicant shall provide FM CE the City with a black line clear Mylar (0.4 mil) copy and a blue line print of the recorded map. 40. Prior to recording the Final Map,the applicant shall complete FM all improvements required by these conditions of approval. Atascadero Mutual Water Company(AMWC): 41. Prior to recording the map,the applicant shall prepare plans FM AMWC that show all existing and proposed water distribution facilities required to provide water service to the subdivision. The plans shall be submitted for review and approval by the • Atascadero Mutual Water Company. The plans shall show the facilities required for fire protection. 42. Prior to recording the parcel map the applicant shall obtain a FM AMWC `Will Serve'letter from Atascadero Mutual Water Company. 43. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall BP AMWC pay all installation and connection fees required by the Atascadero Mutual Water Company,or enter into a Deferred Connection Fee Agreement. 44. All water distribution facilities shall be constructed in BP AMWC conformance with AMWC standards, policies, and approved procedures. 45. Provisions should be made for specific easements for FP AMWC private water service lines to specific parcels. 46. Provide separate water services at manifold to create BP AMWC individual services to each proposed parcel. Connection to water main, installation of water services manifold ant water meters to be performed by AMWC. Wastewater Department 47. Drainage piping serving fixtures which flood level rims BP FD located below the elevation of the next upstream manhole cover the public or private sewer serving such drainage . piping shall be protected form backflow of sewage by installing a approved type backwater valve. Fixtures above such elevation shall not discharge through the backwater 104 Resolution"C December 11,2001 Page 12 of 15 Conditions of Approval/ Timing Responsibility Mitigation . Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure GP:Grading Peril PS:Planning Services BP:Building Pem9t BS:Building Services 6555 Atascadero Avenue SIP:Subdivision FD:FireDeparbnent Vestingtrrent Tentative Tract Ma ImproinalMaverrient Pars PD:PoyEngine r p FM:Find M� CE City Engineer TTM 2001-0007 TO Temporary Oaupancy WW:wastewater FI:Final inspection CA City Adomey F0:Final Occupancy AMWC:Water Comp. valve. • • 105 Resolution"C" December 11,2001 Page 13 of 15 • Exhibit C:Sidewalk Detail l Detached sidewalk behind parkway planter 5' 5' 6' x �t ff 1 O RW S PVE • 106 Resolution"C" December 11,2001 Page 14 of 15 Exhibit D:Arborist Report • 802 PASO ROBLES STREET PASO ROBLES,CALIFORNIA 93446 805/239-1239 FAX 805/239-3742 ARBOR RECEIVE[ ?REE SURGERY NOV 3 % 2001 August 9.2001 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT To Whom It May Concern: This report is in regards to the new construction planned for the northeastern comer of Atascadero avenue and Santa Ynez avenue in the city of Atascadero,lot 1&2 block A- A Atascadero Colony. All statements made in this report are in regards to oak trees that may be impacted from construction. • After reviewing the property and site plan several mitigation measures must be followed to insure minimal damage to the trees. 1. Fencing: Must be a minimum of 4' high, chain link,snow or safety fence, staked at the drip-line or line of encroachment for each tree or group of trees. Fence must be up before any construction or earth moving begins. For areas where this is not possible,aeration of the soil (after development is complete) shall be required. 2. Soil Aeration Methods: Soils under the drip-lines that have been compacted by heavy equipment and/or constriction activities must be returned to their original state before all work is completed. Methods include water jetting, adding organic matter,boring small holes with an auger(18"deep.2-3'apart with a—24"auger)and moderate amounts of nitrogen fertilizer applied. 3. Chip Mulch: All areas (under the drip-lines of the trees) to be cut and all areas that cannot be fenced shall receive a 4-6" deep layer of chip mulch to retain moisture,soil structure and reduce the affects of compaction. 4. Trenching within the Dria-line: All trenching done under the drip-lines of trees shall be hand-dug,augured or bored,and all roots larger then one inch must be cleanly cut by someone who is trained in root pruning with proper hand tools. Wet burlap must be placed over any exposed roots until the trench is refilled. Backhoe operator need to pay special attention to not injure any roots. 5. Grading with the Drip-Line: Grading in excess of 1'in depth shall not encroach within the following setback areas of the trees: Trunk Diameter Set-back for Grading 4"-1 2" 5' l3"-24 10' 24"-36 15' 37"and larger— 20' 6. Pruning Within the Drip-line: All pruning shall be done according to adopted ISA standards. — • 107_ Resolution"C December 11,2001 Page 15 of 15 • 802 PASO ROBLES STREET PASO ROBLES,CAUFORNIA 93446 805/239-1239 FAX 805/239-3742 ARBOR TREE SURGERY 7. Paving Within the Drip-Line: Porous pavers("turfblock",brick,ect.May be required under the drip-lines unless paving area affects less than 25%of the drip-line. 8. Landscaping Within the Drip-Line: Landscape planes for any proposed plantings under the drip-line are required. It is the intent to discourage any planting that requires irrigation,as this practice has been know to kill mature native trees. Planting of drought tolerant species is encouraged. A replacement program for the removed trees will need to be made. See attached copy of Ataseadero's Tree Standards and Guidelines,chapter 8. . Special care needs to be made to trees not on the site but where their drip-line encroaches the site,one south east of parcel 6 and one north of parcel 5,the above mitigation plan is the same for these trees. • Sincerely, f Sea Steven G.Alvarez,Certified Arborist#0511 Arbor Tree Service • Attachment 6: Planning Commission Minutes 11/6/01 i 1918. r! �, 1878 CAD CITY OFATASCADERO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting November 6, 2001 — 7:00 p.m. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Eddings called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. and Commissioner Fonzi led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL . Present: Commissioners Bentz, Blaser, Fonzi, Kelley, O'Malley, Norton and Chairman Eddings Absent: None Staff. Community Development Director Warren Frace, Associate Planner Jamie Kirk and Recording Secretary Grace Pucci. 5. 6555 Atascadero Avenue Single Family Planned Development, ZCH 2001-0014, CUP 2001-0048, TTM 2001-0007 Applicant: Jim Shores,PO Box 216,Atascadero, CA 93423 Project Location: 6555 Atascadero Avenue,Atascadero,CA 93422 (San Luis Obispo County)APN 030-201-001,002 Project Description: The proposed project consists of an application for a zone change, conditional use permit (CUP)and tentative tract map. The zone change request would establish a Planned Development 47 overlay on the site subject to a master plan of development(CUP)that would allow seven(7) single family residences to be constructed. The tentative tract map would create a seven(7) lot subdivision. The project would be subject to • architectural and landscape standards. The project site is a flat lot with one existing single family house and is adjacent to Atascadero Creek. 109 General Plan Designation: LDMF(Low Density Multi-Family)Zoning • District: RMF-10(Residential Multi-Family 10-bedrooms per acre) Environmental PROPOSED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION 2001-044: Determination Based on the findings of the initial study, the Community Development Department recommends that the Planning Commission find that no significant harm would come to the environment from approval of this project, with the incorporation of the proposed mitigation measures. The proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration is available for public review through November 6, 2001 at 6500 Palma Avenue, Community Development Department, Room 104, from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Staff 5. Adopt Resolution No. PC 2001-0057, recommending that the City Recommendation: Council certify Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration; and, 6. Adopt Resolution No. PC 2001-0058, recommending that the City Council introduce an ordinance for first reading to approve Zone Change 2001-0014 based on findings;and, 7. Adopt Resolution No. PC 2001-0059, recommending that the City Council approve the Master Plan of Development (CUP 2001-0048) based on findings and subject to Conditions of Approval and Mitigation Monitoring.;and, 8. Adopt Resolution No. PC 2001-0060, recommending the City Council approve Vesting Tentative Tract Map 2001-0007, based on findings and subject to Conditions of Approval and Mitigation Monitoring. Community Development Director Warren Frace provided the staff report and answered questions of the Commission. PUBLIC COMMENT Russ Thompson, R. Thompson Consulting representing the applicant Jim Shores, stated that this type of project is in demand in Atascadero as it is considered affordable for new construction as well as providing upgraded architecture and extensive landscaping. Regarding maintenance of the sedimentation basin, this could be covered in the C.C.& R.'s or the road maintenance agreement. Mr. Thompson expressed two concerns with the staff report. 1. Condition #12: Request that the pathway easement be dedicated to the City of Atascadero. It is felt that it would be difficult to ask the property owners to accept the liability and maintenance associated with a public pathway. 2. Condition#15: Request to not exclude the use of turf areas in the backyards of those lots that front on the creek, but rather to limit the use of turf to about 50% and incorporate native plants compatible with the riparian habitat. The turf is an important component of the sedimentation basin and will help get oils and sediment . to drop out of the storm water runoff. 110 Commissioner Kelley asked if there are plans for fencing of the yards. Mr. Thompson indicated that perimeter fencing along the creek and Atascadero Avenue would be low • fencing, perhaps split rail, to give an open feeling. The lower two lots would most likely have standard wood fencing in the back yards to provide privacy. Commissioner O'Malley asked if the project excludes the use of chain link fencing. Mr. Thompson assured the Commission that the owner has no intention of using chain link fencing. Commissioner Kelley suggested that privacy fencing be allowed along lots one and four as their property is close to an active walkway. Mr. Thompson was agreeable with this suggestion. Director Frace advised the Commission that in placing a six-foot fence there it would not possible to see what is on the other side of the fence, which might promote loitering, graffiti, etc., where if it were more open, people would be less likely to loiter. If a homeowner wanted a privacy fence within the lot, this could be worked out providing they were not fencing the whole property line. Additionally, these units which are on a raised foundation so they will be a little above the path. Commissioner O'Malley expressed concern with allowing lawn and the impact to trees and creek by the additional watering required. Director Frace stated that staff was concerned that the chemicals, fertilizers and water required of turf might have impacts on the native plants in that area. However, it might be possible to have some small turf areas, and Condition 15 could be reworded to say, "minimize turf lawn area." Commissioner O'Malley asked about ongoing maintenance for the basin area. Mr. Thompson stated that there would be C.C. & R.'s or a maintenance agreement stating that the property owners would contribute to the maintenance of the road and the common utilities. The maintenance of the basin area should it fall into disrepair could be easily be added to the agreement. Commissioner Bentz asked why the applicant is objecting to adding sidewalks into the maintenance or CC&R agreements. Mr. Thompson stated that if it were an internal walkway used exclusively by the people who live there it would be appropriate to include the sidewalks, however as this is a component part of a future walkway that the public would be utilizing up and down the creek, it should be maintained in a public condition by the City. Commissioner O'Malley stated that he is inclined to support the project because of the walkway, and he feels there might be a way to compromise so that the applicant could put it in and maintain it until such time as the City completes its plan of a continuous pathway at which time the City would take over maintenance. Joan O'Keefe, 9985 Old Morro Road East, felt it would be advisable to have the arborist's tree protection plan when the Commission is making the decision on this project. She feels this would provide a baseline for the project. Regarding the easement, Mrs. O'Keefe agrees with the applicant and could envision not having a pathway there but rather vegetating it and have it as an open space easement. She can see having the City take over maintenance of the • pathway because of its public access. She would like to ensure that the live oaks being planted are part of the landscaping plan and not being considered as mitigation because these trees are a different species from the trees being removed. She does not feel oak trees fit into • an area where there is not a lot of room due to the dropping of the acorns. Chairman Eddings closed the Public Comment session. Commissioner Kelley agreed with Mrs. O'Keefe regarding the easement. He does not think a public walkway should go through private property, and that this walkway when developed the way the City wants it to be will be similar to a city park and should be maintained by the City. If maintained by the City it will be taken care of uniformly, and he feels this should be submitted to the City Council suggesting that the property be deeded over to them and they can put the walkway in whenever they want to and maintain it. Additionally, regarding the turf and the fencing, there is the possibility of young families moving into these houses and the creek will pose a hazard to children; homeowners should have the option to protect their families, dogs and property from the public walkway as well as the creek. Commissioner Kelley feels this is a top quality project and much needed in the City. Chairman Eddings also agreed with Mrs. O'Keefe regarding the pathway and the hazards of low fencing. However, he cannot see delaying the project over the arborist's report. In the past the Commission has asked to receive the arborist's report for the public hearing, and he recommends that in the future an arborist's report be submitted at the time of the hearing. Perhaps the report could be submitted to the City Council when they consider this project. Chairman Eddings feels this is a well designed, quality project that will provide badly needed new housing in a moderate price category. He agrees with allowing some turf for its • cleansing quality. Commissioner Blaser suggested that the turf for the backyards not exceed 50% of the space of the yard. Commissioner Fonzi was concerned over the issue of public benefit. If the project is to be approved as a PD-7, it must provide some kind of public benefit and if the walking path is taken out, the Commission must consider denying the PD-7. Commissioner Kelley stated that it is not the intent to remove the creek way access, but rather to transfer the responsibility of its maintenance and ownership to the City. Commissioner Eddings felt it was unfair to ask the future homeowners to assume the liability for that pathway. Commissioner Blaser suggested that the project be conditioned so that the applicant deeded the six-foot easement over to the City and then leave the easement as status quo until such time that the pathway could be laid from start to finish. • Commissioner Fonzi felt the sidewalks are out of character with the neighborhood as there are no other sidewalks along Atascadero Avenue except in front of the school offices on the 112 opposite side of the street. Director Frace stated that there is the option to pay in-lieu fees and defer it, and the City Engineer commonly does that where the sidewalk would be the • only one on the block. However, in this project because it is so near the school, this is an area where sidewalks make sense. Commissioner O'Malley, felt there would be no continuity in placing the sidewalk on the opposite side of the street from the bridge where the pedestrian area actually is. This would encourage people to cross the street to get to the sidewalk. He does not see a need for sidewalks now and likes the idea of waiting until the City gets to a point where they are doing sidewalks in other areas along the street, they could then come back and add it to the tax bill. Commissioner O'Malley likes the decomposed granite walkway along the creek, which could be deeded over to the City. Commissioner Kelley stated that the idea of the General Plan is to maintain the rural atmosphere of the town and he could go along with entering into an agreement in the future when the sidewalks would become part of the neighborhood. He also raised the issue of eliminating some parking along the street if there was a sidewalk in the area. Director Frace asked the Commission to be clear on their recommendation as the City Engineer is strongly recommending the project do frontage improvements including curb, gutter, sidewalk and road widening. Commissioner Norton stated that she favors the curb, gutter and sidewalk recommendation and would like to see it remain. She feels that this would provide better drainage and a safer route to school for the children. If these items were removed, she would like to consult the • Superintendent of Schools who is working on the Safe Route to School project. Commissioner Kelley indicated that the Commission would only be deferring the construction of a sidewalk to such time as other projects come along. Director Frace stated that in a deferred agreement the City would ask the developer to pay an in-lieu fee that the City would bank and likely spend somewhere else. He feels that if this project does not put the sidewalks in they will never be put in. Commissioner O'Malley asked if it were possible in the future to add a walkway to the bridge that would connect to this sidewalk. Director Frace suggested that the Commission recommend that the City Engineer look at the pedestrian continuity and how the bridge would be designed to connect prior to this project going to the City Council for final approval. Commissioner Bentz asked if the frontage improvement includes widening of the street and does the improvement go all the way to the centerline of the street, and, if this is the case, perhaps it is time to force some of these improvements to be done when the construction occurs as there are safety and traffic issues on this street that must be addressed. • i�. 3 Commissioner Norton asked if the school district would sign off on projects like this that are • within a certain radius of the school. Director Frace stated that there is the Safe Route to School program that the School District works with the Public Works Department on. He is uncertain if this is one of the routes, but feels that it most likely is and that this is one of the reasons the City Engineer is recommending a sidewalk be placed there. Commissioner Blaser questioned whether the oak trees should be replaced with other trees per Mrs. O'Keefe's suggestion. Director Frace referred to Master Plan of Development, page 71. Condition #18, is the call out for mitigation, so the nine trees requested for removal translates into a replacement of 20 five-gallon trees. On the staff report, page 54, is the mitigation requirement, so it is either 20 trees or $1,000. Mitigation can be done in any combination the Commission prefers or it can be referred to the applicant and staff to determine. Commissioner Fonzi wants the issue of the sidewalks to be looked at by the City Engineer. Commissioner Kelley would like as part of the motion that the curb, gutter and sidewalk not be a part of the resolution and that the City Engineer and the applicant's engineer work out a resolution to an alternative way to provide for bicycle paths and pedestrian traffic, and that if curb, gutter and sidewalk be required at a future date that a deferred improvement agreement be in place to address that issue. • Commissioner O'Malley felt that this could be approved as recommended by staff with the request that staff or the applicant do the additional research as discussed and pass that research on to the City Council. The recommendation could be as the applicant and staff have agreed upon with the change on items number 12 and 15 of the Conditions with some more research done so that the City Council had some options to consider. Commissioner Bentz felt that the Commission should approve the project as submitted by staff. Chairman Eddings poled the Commission as to whether they preferred to recommend that the sidewalk, curb and gutter work be deferred or to recommend the project as submitted by staff. Commissioner Norton: Approve as drawn with a recommendation that other options be looked at as well. Commissioner Bentz: Agrees with Commissioner Norton. Commissioner Fonzi: Agrees with Commissioners Norton and Bentz as long as the wording is that the City Engineer consider other options and present them to the City is Council. Commissioner O'Malley: Agrees with Commissioner Fonzi. 114 Commissioner Kelley: Agrees with the Commissioners as long as there is strong wording on the recommendation. Commissioner Blaser: Agrees and would word it to say that the City is to revisit the transition from the bridge sidewalk area and consider the character of the neighborhood in the sidewalk recommendation. Chairman Eddings suggested that the project be approved as is with the language that the Commission "strongly recommend" the City Council consider deferring the curb, gutter and sidewalk. Commissioner O'Malley stated that he did not hear the majority of the opinion expressing "strongly recommend." Chairman Eddings poled the Commission on use of the word "strong." Commissioner Norton: Did not like the word. Commissioner Bentz: Did not support it. CommissionerFonzi: Prefers using the term "due consideration." Commissioner O'Malley: Don't need the word "strong." Commissioner Kelley: Abstain. Commissioner Blaser: Can support"due consideration." MOTION: By Vice Chairman Bentz and seconded by Commissioner O'Malley to approve the application as submitted by staff with a request to City Council to give due consideration to the curb, gutter, sidewalk requirement being revised by the City Engineer and/or other alternatives being submitted by him specifically as it pertains to the sidewalk across the creek bridge, the dedication of the six foot trail to the City after completion of construction, the allowance of up to 50% turf in the back yard of lots 1 and 4, and for the staff and developer to work together on tree mitigation. AYES: Commissioners Bentz, O'Malley, Blaser, Kelley, Fonzi,Norton and Chairman Eddings. NOES: None ABSTAIN: None Motion passed 7.0 by a roll-call vote. 11J ITEM NUMBER: C—l DATE: 12/11/2001 :a 511a Fal 1918 d a,. 1978 A'fA��ERo% Atascadero City Council Staff Report — City Manager's Office Modification to El Camino Homeless Organization (ECHO) 2001 CDBG Award RECOMMENDATION: Council review the proposed changes in the scope of the award and direct staff to prepare a contract reflecting ECHO's amended scope of services. DISCUSSION: • On March 13, 2001, Council awarded $20,000 in 2001 CDBG funds to the El Camino Homeless Organization (E.C.H.O.) to provide emergency motel vouchers and purchase office equipment and supplies. Since that time, E.C.H.O. has been working with local churches to arrange overnight shelter in lieu of purchasing motel vouchers, and have arranged for the overnight use of various church facilities on a rotating basis. Because of the significant change in the scope of this program, staff felt that it was appropriate to bring this issue to Council for review. CDBG funds are awarded on a competitive basis, therefore other applicants may feel that their projects could not be fairly evaluated against the revised scope of ECHO's proposed project. Should Council approve these revisions, staff will prepare a revised environmental document, as required by HUD, and prepare a contract reflecting the new scope. 'The proposed revisions to the budget are as follows: 70 Emergency Motel Vouchers to be shared with other $45.00 per night $3,175 agencies 3 Part Time Shelter Workers for Screening Guests — 3 months $6,825 Start Up Year Only 3 hours per da Access to Showers $2,600 S1 Van $6,000 Access to Personal Laundry $1,400 TOTAL $20,000 116 ITEM NUMBER: C- 1 DATE: 12/11/2001 E.C.H.O. is proposing to have emergency motel vouchers available for use as an alternative to • church lodging. These would be used for a variety of reasons, for example, if the guest required facilities for a disability that are not accommodated at the church or a guest is referred after the shelter has closed for the night. Funds are also requested to provide 3 part-time Shelter Workers to screen guests. It is proposed that staff will be hired in cooperation with EOC and the applicant has indicated that CDBG funds will be needed only for"start up" during the first year. Showers and laundry facilities will be provided though a variety of methods. One churches has shower facilities, alternately, shower vouchers can be purchased through a local health club. Laundry facilities will be provided either through the purchase of a washer and dryer, or laundromat vouchers. ECHO will also seek to obtain donations for these types of items. Lastly, E.C.H.O. proposes to purchase a van to transport guests to shower facilities and overnight shelters and to transport supplies between churches. ALTERNATIVES: Alternative #1 - Approve the revised scope of services and direct staff to prepare the environmental documents for County approval and contract. Alternative #2 - Reject the proposed revisions in the scope of services and request that ECHO provide the original scope of services outlined in their grant application. Alternative #3 - Reject the revised scope of services and reallocate the $20,000 grant award to another applicant and project. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENT: ECHO Summary i 117 E C H 0 EI Camino Homeless Organization 7600 EI Camino Real # 12 * P.O. Box 2077 - Atascadero, California 93423 • as,--t�- V, 462-FOOD (462-3663) Overnight Guests at the Church Shelters We have been invited by Atascadero First Assembly of God on Ardilla Road to use their facilities for overnight sheltering of homeless people for the month of December 10-January 10`h. The remainder of the month of January may be taken by Atascadero Community Church and for the month of February we have been welcomed by the United Methodist Church. We will change from a noontime meal to an evening meal beginning December 3`d. During the mealtime (4:30-6:30) guests will be screened and then transported by van to the appropriate church. Who is welcome? People who are without shelter may be considered for overnight sheltering under the following conditions: 1. They are sober • 2. They are willing to abide by the overnight shelter rules 3. They seem to be of normal health 4. They exhibit socially acceptable behavior 5. They are approved by the social worker at the evening meal (between 4:30 and 6:30 at the day center) People who would be better served by a motel voucher include: 1. People who go to the police department after the Church Shelter is locked down for the night 2. People who are obviously ill (i.e. hospital releases, or suffering from contagious conditions) 3. People who are felt by the Women's Shelter to need confidential placement for their safety We will be following the model of The Interfaith Coalition for the Homeless in San Luis Obispo. They have been operating an overnight overflow shelter in churches for approximately ten years. It is our intention to use the CDGB funding from the City of Atascadero to help more people in this way rather than spend the entire amount on motel • vouchers. `ttv ITEM NUMBER: C-2 'S DATE: 12/11/2001 1918 " 0, 1919 9 \ATA'scA►n�/ • Atascadero City Council Staff Report — Community Development Department Off-Sale Beer and Wine Sales License Determination 6305 Morro Road Giessinger Convenience Store and Gas Station RECOMMENDATION: Council determine that the issuance of a beer and wine sales license for off-site consumption will serve a public convenience at 6305 Morro Road. DISCUSSION: Background: The request for an off-site beer and wine sales license is associated with a proposed • convenience market that will be located at the corner of Morro Road and Merchant Avenue. The site has a General Plan designation of Tourist Commercial and corresponding zoning district of CT (Commercial Tourist). Because beer and wine sales are an essential part.of the convenience store use, the applicant is requesting approval of an alcohol sales license concurrently with building permits. Section 23958.4 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act requires the local governing body of the area to determine that the license will serve public convenience or necessity. This process is only required when it is found that Undue Concentration"q o tration of liquor licenses exists within the area. In this case, the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) has determined that there is an undue concentration of liquor licenses within the area and that a determination anon from the local governing body(City Council) will be required. Analysis: ABC determines the allowable number of licenses within an area based on census tract boundaries. The Police Department has reviewed the application and does not foresee any significant public welfare issues associated with the issuance of a license at the proposed location. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS Location Map • Master Plan of Development Site Plan L19 ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 12/11/2001 Attachment 1 ABC License 2000-0002: Giessinger Convenience Market • Location Map 10 /cad. \ i20 ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 12/11/2001 Attachment 2 ABC License 2001-0002:Giessinger Convenience Market Site Plan 11 - AT J� LU zL z IV! 01 1 C: wo 1 f o(D Location of future ° w convenience market 1 z z O w �Nf tI > ti' tl! < I r z 2 Z I z iiCCll 9 u v�' rz W J i �jj � [•vol. �cz;> S F 3 f1 N li 0 0 3 .L All • 121