The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda Packet 11/27/2001 141 NMI AGENDA 1918 1 9 ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 27, 2001 7:00 P.M. City of Atascadero 6500 Palma Avenue, 4th Floor Atascadero, California REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: 6:30 P.M. • REGULAR SESSION, 7:00 P.M.: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Council Member Johnson ROLL CALL: Mayor Arrambide Mayor Pro Tem Scalise Council Member Clay Council Member Johnson Council Member Luna APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Roll Call COMMUNITY FORUM: (This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wanting to address the Council on any matter not on this agenda and over which the Council has jurisdiction. Speakers are limited to five minutes. Please state your name and address for the record before making your presentation. The Council may take action to direct the staff to place a matter of business on a future agenda.) 1; COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS: , (On their own initiative, Council Members may make a brief announcement or a brief report on their own activities. Council Members may ask a question for clarification, make a referral to staff or take action to have staff place a matter of business on a future agenda. The Council may take action on items listed on the Agenda.) 1. Bow Hunting - Council Member Clay will give a verbal report on the sub- committee meeting concerning bow hunting. The City Council may give direction to staff regarding this issue. 2. Vehicle License Fee (VLF) - The City Council asked staff to draft a letter to Governor Davis expressing Atascadero's opposition to any takeaway of VLF revenue. ■ Staff recommendation: Council authorize the Mayor to sign the draft letter expressing Atascadero's opposition to any takeaway of VLF revenue. [City Manager] A. CONSENT CALENDAR: Roll Call (All items on the consent calendar are considered to be routine and non-controversial by City staff and will be approved by one motion if no member of the Council or public wishes to comment or ask questions. If comment or discussion is desired by anyone, the item will be removed from the consent calendar and will be considered in the listed • sequence with an opportunity for any member of the public to address the Council concerning the item before action is taken.) 1. City Council Minutes—November 13, 2001 ■ City Clerk recommendation: Council approve the City Council minutes of November 13, 2001. [City Clerk] 2., Shores/Davis Cluster Residential Subdivision - Zone Change 2001-0015 - 3900 Traffic Way (Shores/Tarr) ■ Fiscal Impact: The project would likely have a slight negative impact on City revenues. As a general rule, single-family dwellings require services that exceed the revenue generated by the dwelling. ■ Staff recommendation: Council introduce for second reading by title only, and adopt the draft Ordinance enacting Zone Change 2001-0015, changing the zoning district of a portion of APN 049-033-021 from "L "(Recreation) to "LS "(Special Recreation) thereby making single-family residential a conditionally allowable use. [Community Development] 2 3. Final Parcel Map 2001-0016 /AT 01-082 - 9900 Santa Lucia Road (Stark/ Wilson Land Surveys) ■ Fiscal Impact: None ■ Staff recommendation: Council: 1. Accept Final Parcel Map 2001-0016 (AT 01-082); and, 2. Reject without prejudice, the public utility easement (P.UE)shown on Final Parcel Map 2001-0016 [Public Works] 4. Final Parcel Map 2001-0014/AT 01-231 - 6350 Navarette Avenue (Bolton) ■ Fiscal Impact: None ■ Staff recommendation: Council: 1. Accept Final Parcel Map 2001-0014 (AT 01-231); and, 2. Reject without prejudice, the public utility easement (P.UE) shown on Final Parcel Map 2001-0014 [Public Works] B. PUBLIC HEARINGS: None C. MANAGEMENT REPORTS: 1. Appointment of Youth Representative -Parks and Recreation Commission ■ Fiscal Impact: None • ■ Staff recommendation: Council appoint Drew Wardlaw as the Youth Representative to the Parks and Recreation Commission for a one-year term, beginning January 1, 2002. [Community Services] 2. West Mall Closure ■ Fiscal Impact: Approximately,$500.00 ■ Staff recommendation: Council set a Public Hearing to consider the request from Atascadero Unified School District for the closure of West Mall between Lewis Avenue and Olmeda Avenue during Atascadero Junior High School hours. [Public Works] 3. 2002 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) - Project Funding ■ Fiscal Impact: $423,000.00 STIP funds towards a State Project or the City of Atascadero's "Local Choice"project. ■ Staff recommendation: Council consider San Luis Obispo Council of Governments request that Atascadero's 2002 State Transportation Improvement Program "Local Choice"funds of S423,000.00 be used as a match for the SR 41/US 101 Interchange Replacement Project. [Public Works] 3 4. Lot Line Adjustment #2001-0033 - (City of Atascadero / Kelly Gearhart) 5599 Traffic Way& 5501 Traffic Way ■ Fiscal Impact: None ■ Staff recommendation: Council: 1. Adopt the draft Resolution "A" approving the acceptance of 2,500 +/- square feet of property proposed to be exchanged in Lot Line Adjustment 2001-0033, consistent with the Planning Commission's finding that the exchange of City property involved in LLA 2001-0033 is consistent with the City's General Plan as required by California Government Code Section 65402; and 2. Adopt the draft Resolution "B" approving Lot Line Adjustment 2001-0033, based on appropriate findings and subject to conditions of approval. [Community Development] 5. Information Bulletin a. El Camino Homeless Organization(ECHO) D. COMMITTEE REPORTS: (The following represent standing committees. Informative status reports will be given, as felt necessary.): Mayor Arrambide 1. S.L.O. Council of Governments(SLOCOG)/S.L.O. Regional Transit Authority(SLORTA) 2. Water Committees • 3. County Mayor's Round Table Mayor Pro Tem Scalise 1. Finance Committee 2. City/ Schools Committee 3. Economic Opportunity Commission(EOC) 4. Atascadero State Hospital Advisory Board 5. Economic Vitality Corporation, Board of Directors (EVC) Council Member Luna 1. Finance Committee 2. Integrated Waste Management Authority(IWMA) 3. North County Homeless Coalition Council Member Johnson 1. Local Agency Formation Commissions (LAFCO) Council Member Clay 1. Air Pollution Control District(APCD) 2. City/ Schools Committee • 4 E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION: • 1. City Council 2. City Clerk 3. City Treasurer 4. City Attorney 5. City Manager F. ADJOURNMENT: Please note: Should anyone challenge any proposed development entitlement listed on this Agenda in court, that person may be limited to raising those issues addressed at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at or prior to this public hearing. I, Marcia McClure Torgerson, the City Clerk of the City of Atascadero, declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing agenda for the November 27, 2001 Regular Session of the Atascadero City Council was posted on November 212001 at Atascadero City Hall, 6500 Palma Ave., Atascadero, CA 93422 and was available for public review in the City Clerk's • office at that location. Signed this 21" of November, 2001 at Atascadero, California. /)/&4 Ce -- Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk City of Atascadero w 5 City ofAtascadero WELCOME TO THEATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL MEETING The City Council meets in regular session on the second and fourth Tuesday of each month at 7:00 p.m., • in the Council Chamber of City Hall. Matters are considered by the Council in the order of the printed Agenda. Copies of the staff reports or other documentation relating to each item of business referred to on the Agenda are on file in the office of the City Clerk(Room 311) available for public inspection during City Hall business hours. An agenda packet is also available for public review at the Atascadero Library, 6850 Morro Road. Contracts, Resolutions and Ordinances will be allocated a number once they are approved by the City Council. The minutes of this meeting will reflect these numbers. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in . a City meeting or other services offered by this City, please contact the City Manager's Office, (805) 461-5010, or the City Clerk's Office, (805)461-5074. Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time when services are needed will assist the City staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting or service. TO SPEAK ON AGENDA ITEMS Members of the audience may speak on any item on the agenda. The Mayor will identify the subject, staff will give their report, and the Council will ask questions of staff. The Mayor will announce when the public comment period is open and will request anyone interested to address the Council regarding the matter being considered to step up to the podium. If you wish to speak for, against or comment in any way: • You must approach the podium and be recognized by the Mayor • Give your name and address(not required) • Make your statement • All comments should be made to the Mayor and Council • All comments limited to 5 minutes(unless changed by the Council) • No one may speak for a second time until everyone wishing to speak has had an opportunity to do so,and no one may speak more than twice on any item. The Mayor will announce when the public comment period is closed, and thereafter, no further public comments will be heard by the Council TO SPEAK ON SUBJECTS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA Under Agenda item, "COMMUNITY FORUM", the Mayor will call for anyone from the audience having business with the Council to: • Please approach the podium and be recognized • Give your name and address • State the nature of your business This is the time items not on the Agenda maybe brought to the Council's attention. A maximum of 30 minutes will be allowed for Community Forum(unless changed by the Council). TO HAVE ITEMS PLACED ON AGENDA All business matters to appear on the Agenda must be in the Office of the City Manager ten days v preceding the Council meeting. Should you have a matter you wish to bring before the Council, please mail or bring a written communication to the City Manager's office in City Hall prior to the deadline. DATE: 11/27/2001 ..s ■®I� i!AI Atascadero City Council Staff Report — City Manager's Office Vehicle License Fee RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Mayor to sign a letter to the Governor opposing any takeaway of Vehicle License Fee revenue. DISCUSSION: The City Council directed staff to prepare a letter or resolution to be sent to the Governor opposing any takeaway of Vehicle License Fee revenue. Staff contacted the League of California Cities which urged Council Members to make direct personal contact with legislators and not develop Council resolutions. Staff prepared the attached letter to be sent to the Governor with copies to the local legislators framing the City's position and potential personal contacts. • 001 Y CITY OF ATASCADERO 19 9L q - - • g; 7 CITY COUNCIL November 21, 2001 Governor Gray Davis State Capitol Sacramento, CA 95814 Honorable Governor Davis: The City of Atascadero opposes any consideration of reducing the statutory backfill of vehicle license fee (VLF) revenues to cities and counties. We fully understand the financial problems currently facing the State and can emphasize with the difficult work that lies ahead of you in steering the State through these financial times. We faced a similar challenge in the early 1990's when the State shifted local revenues to meet the budget shortfall. Atascadero has not recovered • from the ERAF shift, which virtually eliminated infrastructure maintenance and caused the layoff of many City employees, thus the elimination of service. The VLF in Atascadero represents 12% of the General Fund revenue. Public Safety represents 52% of the General Fund expense, so it is clear that a VLF takeaway would have serious implications. VLF revenue is nearly $1.5 million dollars and the third largest revenue source for the City. Coupled with the economic declines which are now expected to be greater than forecasted prior to September 11th, any State takeaway could be devastating. In Atascadero, we have been forced to minimum public safety staffing which is already below objective standards. The Fire Department has two engine companies with two fire personnel on shift. Given the "two in, two out" rule, the department cannot enter a building for rescue or fire fighting until both engines are on scene. If this manning were reduced, the department would not be able to respond without calling someone back from off duty. The Police Department is in a similar position. At times there is a minimum staff of two officers on duty. The City is 25 square miles with 26,000 residents and 140 miles of roads. Police resources are already stretched making service reductions unsafe. The State when changing the VLF revenue made assurances to local government and the public that local government revenues would not be impacted. The State's credibility is at stake. It is the cities and counties that the State turns to when State-wide issues are at stake. When the energy crisis was at its height, cities and counties answered the call; likewise in a variety of state- • 6500 PALMA AVENUE • ATASCADERO,CALIFORNIA 93422 (805)461-5086 • FAX(805)461-0606 002 November 27,2001 Governor Gray Davis Page 2 • wide policy areas we can be depended on. It would be severely damaging for the State and its many working relationships to again turn its back on local government. We urge you to respect that assurances made and protect our local citizens from losses to critical services. Sincerely, J. Michael Arrambide Mayor JMA:mmt 003 ITEM NUMBER: A-1 DATE: 11/27/2001 Roln A1 ■ DRAFT MINUTES '��+oi ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 13, 2001 7:00 P.M. CLOSED SESSION: (immediately following the Community Redevelopment Agency meeting) 1. PUBLIC COMMENT - CLOSED SESSION: None 2. Call to Order a.) Conference with legal counsel - Pending litigation (Govt. Code Sec. 54956.9) • Diamond v City of Atascadero 3. Adjourn 4. CLOSED SESSION REPORT City Attorney Roy Hanley announced there was no reportable action taken. REGULAR SESSION, 7:00 P.M.: Mayor Arrambide called the meeting to order at 7:10 p.m. and Council Member Clay led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL: Present: Council Members Clay, Johnson, Luna, Scalise and Mayor Arrambide Absent: None • Others Present: City Clerk Marcia McClure Torgerson and City Treasurer David Graham CC 11/13/01 Pagel 004 ITEM NUMBER: A- 1 DATE: 11/27/2001 Staff Present: City Manager Wade McKinney, Assistant City Manager Brady Cherry, • Police Chief Dennis Hegwood, Fire Chief Kurt Stone, Administrative Services Director Rachelle Rickard, Community Development Director Warren Frace, Public Works Director Steve Kahn, Technology Director Andrew Fruin and City Attorney Roy Hanley. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: MOTION: By Council Member Luna and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Scalise to approve the Agenda. Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. COMMUNITY FORUM: Eric Greening, 7365 Valle, discussed the action by the County Planning Commission on October 25th wherein a project by Union Asphalt was approved allowing them to dig up 1 `/2 to 2 miles of Huero Heuro Creek over a ten year period, transporting that material to the plant near Templeton. The City of Paso Robles on November 61h, concerned about the loaded trucks traveling on Niblick Road and over the Veterans Memorial Bridge, appealed the project to the Board of Supervisors where a hearing will be held early next year. Mr. Greening urged the Council to support the City of Paso Robles in their contention that this project needs an EIR and complete analysis of the impacts and mitigation measures. Marge Mackey, Tunitas, asked the Council if there is a ban on backyard burning would it be possible to have a chipper available that could move from neighborhood to neighborhood. Ms. Mackey stated that she has a vacant lot where the chipper could be set up if the City wished to follow up on such an arrangement. Additionally, she expressed support for the requirement of sidewalks on the Shores project. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS: Council Member Clay stated, in regard to backyard burning, that he is on the APCD Board and has attended every meeting and is under the impression that the City will be continuing as it has in the past. City Manager Wade McKinney stated that he has discussed this issue with the Fire Chief who spoke with APCD. They will be issuing a press release on Friday, to the effect that in the hazard reduction areas, burning will still be allowed. Council Member Clay announced the meeting regarding Bow and Arrow Hunting within the Atascadero City limits will be held Wednesday, November 14 from 5:00 to 7:00 p.m. in Room 102, City Hall. The public will be invited to attend and give testimony regarding the issue. • CC 11/13/01 Page 2 005 ITEM NUMBER: A- 1 DATE: 11/27/2001 Council Member Luna asked for a status report on the money the State had promised Atascadero • for the Youth Center. City Manager Wade McKinney stated that those funds had been frozen, however a call was received today by the Recreation Department indicating that the funds have become available as of today. The contract is being processed and staff is working with the State to see how payment can be expedited to insure that the City has cash in hand before the next freeze occurs. Escrow is expected to close on December 15, 2001. Mayor Pro Tem Scalise stated she has received calls about the backyard burning issue and would like to see the City of Atascadero issue a press release explaining our cooperation with the APCD and that our Fire Chief is going to be designating specific burn days for the community. Council Member Clay referred to the drainage ditch in the area of the proposed Youth Center and asked if the City would be giving up property on the lot line adjustment. Mr. McKinney indicated that the City is looking at a potential trade of property on the rear of the industrial site that would give direct access to the park. Regarding the road on the east side between the two buildings, Mr. McKinney stated that a third building will be going in at that site which will eliminate access on the east side. A. CONSENT CALENDAR: Roll Call 1. City Council Minutes—October 23, 2001 ■ City Clerk recommendation: Council approve the City Council minutes of October 23, 2001. [City Clerk] 2. City Treasurer's Agenda Report- September 2001 ■ City Treasurer recommendation: Council review and accept the September 2001 Treasurer's Report. [City Treasurer] 3. Annual Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Goal ■ Fiscal Impact: Staff time to monitor DBE Program. ■ Staff recommendation: Council adopt annual Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE)participation goal. [Public Works] 4. El Camino Real Rehabilitation Project-Bid No. 99-08 ■ Fiscal Impact: S480,414.81 ■ Staff recommendation: Council: 1. Accept R. Burke Corporation's work as complete; and 2. Authorize the Contract Change Order No. I with R. Burke Corporation for $20,396.10; and 3. Authorize the Finance Director to release the project retention of$20,39610. [Public Works] CC 11/13/01 Page 3 006 ITEM NUMBER: A- 1 DATE: 11/27/2001 5. Zone Change 2001-0016 - Planned Development 16 Overlay District - Code Text Amendment and Official Zoning Map Amendment - 5725 Portola Road (Messer / • Vaughan Surveys) ■ Fiscal Impact: The project would likely have a slight negative impact on City revenues. As a general rule, single-family dwellings require services that exceed the revenue generated by the dwelling. ■ Staff recommendation: Council: 1. Adopt on second reading by title only, the draft Ordinance approving Zone Change 2001-0016 amending the City's Municipal Code to create a new Planned Development 16 Overlay District; and, 2. Adopt on second reading by title only, the draft Ordinance approving Zone Change 2001-0016 amending the City's Official Zoning Map to add a PD 16 overlay district to APN 054-022-033. [Community Development] Council Member Luna requested that Item#A-5 be pulled. MOTION: By Council Member Johnson and seconded by Council Member Clay to approve Consent Calendar Items #A-1, 2, 3 and 4. Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. MOTION: By Council Member Johnson and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Scalise to approve Consent Calendar Item #A-5. Motion passed 4:1 by a roll-call vote. (Luna opposed) (Ordinance No. 387 and 388) B. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. Shores/Davis Cluster Residential Subdivision Amendment - Amendment of Planned Development 15 with a 44-lot Tract Map - Zone Change 2001-0015 - Master Plan of Development (CUP) 2001-0040 - Tentative Tract Map 98013 - 3900 Traffic Way (Shores /Tarr) ■ Fiscal Impact: The project would likely have a slight negative impact on City revenues. As a general rule, single-family dwellings require services that exceed the revenue generated by the dwelling. ■ Planning Commission recommendations: Council: 1. Adopt Draft Resolution "A", re-certifying the previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration 99029; and, 2. Introduce for first reading by title only, an ordinance amending the Official Zoning Map consistent with Zone Change 2001-0015; and, 3. Adopt Draft Resolution "B", approving the amendment of the Master Plan of Development for PD-15 (CUP 2001-0040) subject to Conditions of Approval and Exhibits; and, 4. Adopt Draft Resolution "C", approving amendment of Tentative Tract Map 98013 subject to Conditions of Approval and Exhibits. [Community Development] •Y CC 11/13/01 Page 4 007 ITEM NUMBER: A- 1 DATE: 11/27/2001 Community Development Director Warren Frace gave the staff report and answered questions of • Council. PUBLIC COMMENT Russ Thompson, representative for Applicant Jim Shores, clarified their proposal and answered questions of Council. John Burch,Native American Heritage Commission, stated that of the two archeologists working on the project, one has walked off the job and the other does not have a signed contract. He urged the Council to make sure that the archeology sites within this project will be preserved. Eric Greening, 7365 Valle, asked the Council to preserve the historical sites within this project. Patty Dutton, a Native American, said she assisted the archeologist, John Atwood. She explained his report was based on his survey of this project in its original form. She stressed this new amended proposal was not surveyed by the archeologist. Russ Thompson, responded to some of the public's comments. He stated that the archeologist has reviewed the map with the three additional lots and his letter of July 25th included in the staff report (page 51) was produced after reviewing the phase three map revisions. Mayor Arrambide closed the Public Comment period • Council Member Johnson stated that staff has gone a long way toward preserving open o space, p wetlands and sensitive areas on this project, however, with a project of this size, it is difficult to foresee all the issues which unfold as the project progresses. Mayor Arrambide asked Community Development Director Frace if he was satisfied that the archeological requirements are being met at this time and if there is to be an archeologist of record on the project. Mr. Frace stated that staff continues to work with the applicant and the property owner on getting the archeological issues resolved. They are working with Clay Singer and Mr. Thompson to ensure that everything is progressing on the site according to the conditions. It is a State requirement that the archeological resources cannot be destroyed and it is the role of the archeologist on the project to determine what the process will be to ensure they are not destroyed; the project will not move forward until the archeological requirements are met. Council Member Luna indicated that in his opinion this project lacks good planning and implementation. He stated that this was not the project he originally voted for, he thinks it is a misuse to pull out the LS zoning, that what has occurred archeologically is inept and he is withdrawing his support of the project. CC 11/13/01 Page 5 008 ITEM NUMBER: A- 1 DATE: 11/27/2001 MOTION: By Council Member Johnson and seconded by Council Member Clay to adopt Draft Resolution "A", re-certifying the previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration 99029. Motion passed 4:1 by a roll-call vote. (Luna opposed) (Resolution No. 2001-042) MOTION: By Council Member Johnson and seconded by Council Member Clay to introduce for first reading by title only, an ordinance amending the Official Zoning Map consistent with Zone Change 2001-0015. Motion passed 4:1 by a roll-call vote. (Luna opposed) MOTION: By Council Member Johnson and seconded by Council Member Clay to adopt Draft Resolution "B", approving the amendment of the Master Plan of Development for PD-15 (CUP 2001-0040) subject to Conditions of Approval and Exhibits. Motion passed 4:1 by a roll-call vote. (Luna opposed) (Resolution No. 2001-043) MOTION: By Council Member Johnson and seconded by Council Member Clay to adopt Draft Resolution "C", approving amendment of Tentative Tract Map 98013 subject to Conditions of Approval and Exhibits. Motion passed 4:1 by a roll-call vote. (Luna opposed) (Resolution No. 2001-044) Mayor A rrambide called a recess at 8:33 p.m. Mayor Arrambide reopened the meeting at 8:40 p.m. 2. Appeal of Tentative Parcel Map 2001-0018 - Conditions 10 and 11 - 2000 Ferrocarril Road (Gearhart/ Wilson Land Surveys) Community Development Director Warren Frace gave a brief staff report and answered questions of Council. Council Member Clay, the Appellant, explained to the Council his appeal of this project. His main concern is the liability and maintenance of the easement. He stated he feels the City of Atascadero should take full responsibility for this easement, and he would like to see a staging area developed. Council Member Clay distributed pictures as part of his presentation. (Attachment A) PUBLIC COMMENT Myra Douglas, Chairman Amigos De Anza, stated she supports this proposed access to the River and the De Anza Trail. She also said she supports the development of a staging area. CC 11/13/01 Page 6 009 ITEM NUMBER: A- 1 DATE: 11/27/2001 • Bill Obermeyer, Atascadero resident, commended the Council for creating this access to the River. He urged the Council to develop a staging area as people will park at the entrance and disturb the residences in the area. Tom O'Malley, Planning Commissioner, stated the Planning Commission unanimously supported the creation of public access to the trail, but they did struggle with uncertainty as to how to secure access while meeting the needs of the City. He would like to see these legal issues addressed by the Council. Speaking personally, he stated that he has met with neighbors in the area and the two key issues appear to be limitation of vehicle traffic and continued access to the public areas of the river and the trail. He also agreed with the proposed staging area to provide for vehicle parking off of the cul-de-sac. Jean Kuntz, stated she supports the creation of this easement and staging area. Jonelle Norton, 7700 Atascadero Ave., expressed her concern with the size of the cul-de-sac and the proximity of the neighbors along the cul-de-sac. She would like to see the trail continue to be used for pedestrian and light horse access. She is concerned that a staging area might encourage overnight use or large gatherings, which would impact the neighborhood. She sees this as more of a neighborhood access rather than a primary one and would like to see signage welcoming people to the trail while directing them to larger staging areas to the north or south for trailer use, etc. . Kelly Gearhart, Applicant, stated he offered the 20-foot easement but he is opposed to the staging area. Marge Mackey, Tunitas, felt that Council Member Clay's plan was a good one and if the trail and staging area were developed before the homes were built, then potential buyers would know they were there and would have the option not to purchase if they did not like it. Joe Kuntz, Atascadero resident, stated he likes Council Member Clay's plan, and feels that if the foot trail is to be shared with pedestrians it must be at least 20 feet wide. He felt that a staging area would prevent people with large horse trailers from parking in front of homes in the neighborhood. Mayor Arrambide closed the Public Comment period Council Member Johnson commended the Planning Commission for requiring the trail access. He does not however support placing a major staging area at this location as one already exists to the north. Additionally, he does not support the City assuming the liability for the easement at this time. Mayor Pro Tem Scalise was pleased to hear all of the comments on this item, she stated that she feels the two staging areas to the trail are sufficient, and that having a staging area in a residential neighborhood would present problems. CC 11/13/01 Page 7 010 ITEM NUMBER: A- 1 DATE: 11/27/2001 Council Member Luna felt that some parking was necessary for pedestrian usage of the trail to avoid a negative impact on the neighborhood. He stated that it is time for the City to assume • some responsibility for these trails within the community. Council Member Clay stated that there would eventually be a natural staging area in that location as people will pull in and park to use the trail. He feels those individuals who use these trails are good people who will not be parking overnight, partying, etc. MOTION: By Council Member Clay that the easement include a staging area at the end of the cul-de-sac, a minimum of 40 feet by 60 feet wide. Motion failed for lack of a second. Council Member Johnson reiterated that he supports the trail. Council Member Luna commented that the City Attorney has stated that the Council does not have the nexus to do what Council Member Clay proposed. Council Member Clay disagreed with Council Member Luna. MOTION: By Council Member Johnson and seconded by Council Member Luna to deny the appeal. Motion passed 4:1 by a roll-call vote. (Clay opposed) C. MANAGEMENT REPORTS: • 1. Parks and Recreation Commission Youth Representative - Proposed Revisions to the Age Requirements ■ Fiscal Impact: None ■ Staff recommendation: Council adopt the draft Resolution revising the age requirements for the Parks and Recreation Commission Student Representative. [Community Services] Assistant City Manager Brady Cherry presented the staff report. PUBLIC COMMENT Eric Greening, 7365 Valle, expressed his support for this update of the youth representative recruitment process. Mayor Arrambide closed the Public Comment period MOTION: By Council Member Clay and seconded by Council Member Johnson to adopt the draft Resolution revising the age requirements for the Parks and Recreation Commission Student Representative. Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. (Resolution No. 2001-045) CC 11/13/01 i Page 011 ITEM NUMBER: A- 1 DATE: 11/27/2001 • 2. Information Bulletin a. Energy Conservation: Assistant City Manager Brady Cherry referred Council to the spreadsheet in their packets outlining the City's kilowatt usage during July and August 2001. Citywide electrical use was reduced by approximately 16% in August and 9% overall. City buildings showed significant reductions in kilowatt usage. b. Chamber's Activities and Programs - July through September 2001 D. COMMITTEE REPORTS: Mayor Arrambide 1. S.L.O. Council of Governments (SLOCOG)/S.L.O. Regional Transit Authority (SLORTA): SLOCOG met and a recommendation was made that Atascadero would contribute their regional Choice Funds into the formula for the 101/41-interchange redo. It is a $14 million project, which will translate to $423,000. There was support for this recommendation but with the understanding that it would be placed on the Council's next agenda. 2. Water Committees: A presentation was made at the North County Water Purveyor's Forum by Christine Ferrar, County Engineer, regarding the Nacimiento 17,500 acre-feet of water that would be available. The issue is that San Luis Obispo needs this water while the North County jurisdictions do not. 3. County Mayor's Round Table: Met in Morro Bay and had a presentation on the anhydrous ammonia leak and subsequent evacuation of the downtown. 4. Mayor Arrambide announced that there is joint City Council meeting planned for January 24th, notices will be sent to Council Members. Mayor Pro Tem Scalise 1. City / Schools Committee: The truancy issue was discussed and a report is being put together to be presented to the Atascadero Youth Task Force with a final report submitted to the Superintendent of Schools. The suggested Safe Routes to School program has applied for a grant. 2. Economic Opportunity Commission (EOC): Meets Thursday and will be receiving a report from County Administration on the tobacco funds and the upcoming ballot initiative. 3. Atascadero State Hospital Advisory Board: Had an in-depth briefing on the recent escape and the issues brought to light by it. 4. Economic Vitality Corporation, Board of Directors (EVC): Council Member Johnson will be going to Camp Roberts on Thursday to review some potential liaisons resulting from government proposals at the Camp. CC 11/13/01 9 Page 9 012 ITEM NUMBER: A- 1 DATE: 11/27/2001 Council Member Luna 1. Integrated Waste Management Authority (IWMA): Meets tomorrow at which time • information will be available as to the cost of shipping and disposal of CRT's and television sets (now considered hazardous waste) to Kettleman City. 2. North County Homeless Coalition: There was a discussion regarding working with various churches to provide a homeless night shelter. Council Member Johnson 1. Local Agency Formation Commissions (LAFCO): Mike Ryan has been elected as a statewide board member to LAFCO. E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION: City Council Mayor Arrambide met with a downtown merchant who was upset because the City filled several holes in the sidewalk with cement where there once were trees. A discussion ensued regarding the City's plan for trees in the downtown. City Treasurer City Treasurer David Graham reminded the Council that interest rates continue to plummet. City Manager City Manager Wade McKinney told the Council the State is facing an $8-$14 billion deficit. He explained they would either raise taxes and/or cut their budget. Atascadero's total VLF revenue is approximately$1.4 million and is 12 % of the City's budget. The backfill portion by the State, which is at risk, is about $980,000. One of the ideas that San Luis Obispo County has heard from the State is a potential plan by the Legislative Budget Committee that would take away the backfill VLF. The City will now work at contacting their various employee associations, as well as informing the Chamber of Commerce and the newspapers about this State finance issue, and letters are being prepared for Council signatures to the various individuals involved in this discussion. 51% of the City's operation is currently allotted to public safety and both the Police Chief and Fire Chief have indicated that the City is currently understaffed with respect to the continued operation of both departments. Within operations, most of the budget goes to keeping the lights on in the buildings and putting gas in the vehicles. There are no special project funds in operations, and very few funds to be cut in public safety, so if more than 50% of the budget is taken away and cannot be touched, then what must be dealt with is a million dollars worth of cuts in the remaining budget. Built into this budget was an expectation of a downturn in the economy and a variety of places have been funded including the reserves and set asides for equipment and buildings via rolling stock and other places, including PERS. A straight out million-dollar takeaway in addition to the reduction would have a negative impact on the level of services provided to the community. As Atascadero explains to its citizens in specific measures what a million dollar cut means, it is hoped that grassroots support will be generated for keeping local government revenues whole in dealing with the State's fiscal issues in Sacramento. Additional information will be provided, and letters will be prepared for any Council Member • CC 11/13/01 Page 10 013 ITEM NUMBER: A- 1 DATE: 11/27/2001 who wishes to individually sign, and general letters will be provided to the Governor and • Legislature regarding the City's concern for the vehicle license fee takeaway. F. ADJOURNMENT: Mayor Arrambide adjourned the meeting at 10:27 p.m. to the next regularly scheduled meeting on November 27, 2001. MEETING RECORDED AND MINUTES PREPARED BY: Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk Attachment A—Council Member Clay • CC 11/13/01 Page 11 014 2i Mi In iiio .q $• � ,� ,.tp Tat 8p�,�� c rF y, €�` } q'` '�. � �:x t •yam �j j� i �.� �v �- _ 1 v. F < a v. • z a a � ara ` `• all UME 117111 r I / SLO COUNTY W" r • .t^�n .Jwt 2b R -." y 1rQ �xar�. � ePi�: .� "�T• ,�y ..yam. I z� • .� r;�,� 3S}N��Y •K�'�:2�t�Sl it..:A2't�'}aiY SI i.Je.45r.' M' r"M,i.."+�..?T;YF .. EL Rail am U ra'tijb�nc^„v ir1F' -0 rte. _ r,\` n 'X a°k n e - x �!"14 �.�Fl�..a.... •... � ... r� ....ate+�. ~Y� • ti: �i 4 r 3FaW� v aL�.+ -a. ''rF .i Y�`^'`1�.�"y��w..- 'fi5�?1►'!c+ a _ IT4 • '�:..- 1 �: .+chi'f 0 �i'F'.y�'.yYr`-�+�"^*��' � _ a Ad G X ya'-✓ b F A 016 i4 �m 3L � $► - 3t '' 1 n � ? ,s, v # �'�+�. moi` S� �,. rdi:e v b >'�* .A* f .',fit:. H� �Jy •+ � R �.F5'�r��/} � �,4�� `w i t a , r ITEM NUMBER: A-2 _ DATE: 11/27/2001 • 7i 1918 e� is e Atascadero City Council Staff Report- Community Development Department Shores / Davis Cluster Residential Subdivision Zone Change 2001-0015 3900 Traffic Way / Shores / Tarr RECOMMENDATION: City Council introduce for second reading by title only, and adopt the draft Ordinance enacting Zone Change 2001-0015, changing the zoning district of a portion of APN 049- 033-021 from "L" (Recreation) to "LS" (Special Recreation) thereby making single- family residential a conditionally allowable use. • SUBJECT: The proposed project consists of an amendment to the zoning district and previously approved tentative tract map for the Shores / Davis Cluster Residential Subdivision. The original project was approved in 1999 and allowed 41 clustered lots with a net density of 35 residential units, a ±5.1 acre wetlands preserve and 6.8± acre City park site. The proposed amendment would relocate two lots that have been determined to be within jurisdictional wetlands and create three additional lots for a total of 44 lots. The zoning change request would change the zoning district of 0.7± acres from L (recreation) to LS (special recreation) thereby making single-family residential a conditionally allowable use. The net area of the wetlands preserve would not be reduced by the project. The project site has a General Plan designation of HDSF (high density single-family) and REC (recreation) with corresponding zoning districts of RSF-X (single-family residential 1/2 acre min.) and L (recreation). The project is located at 3900 Traffic Way (APN 049- 033-021). DISCUSSION: On November 13, 2001, the City Council conducted a public hearing to consider amendment of the Official Zoning Map of the City of Atascadero. The zone change will amend the Official Zoning Map consistent with the approved changes to the Master Plan • of Development for PD-15. C�lg ITEM NUMBER: A-2 DATE: 11/27/2001 There were no changes made by the City Council to the Ordinance during its first reading • and it is ready for final adoption as attached. FISCAL IMPACT: The project would likely have a slight negative impact on City revenues. As a general rule, single-family dwellings require services that exceed the revenue generated by the dwelling. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1: Draft Ordinance • • 019 'x ITEM NUMBER: A-2 DATE: 11/27/2001 • Attachment 4: Draft Ordinance Approve Zoning Map Change 2001-0015 DRAFT ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF ATASCADERO THEREBY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP DISTRICT OF A PORTION OF APN 049-033-021 FROM "L /PD- 15" (RECREATION) TO "LS /PD-15" (SPECIAL RECREATION WITH A PD-15 OVERLAY DISTRICT) SUBJECT TO A MASTER PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT. (ZCH 2001-0015) (3900 Traffic Way/ Shores) WHEREAS, an application has been received from Jim Shores (PO Box 216, Atascadero, CA 93422) Applicant and Property Owner to consider a project consisting of a Zone Change (ZCH 2001-0015) of 0.75 acres from L/PD-15 (Recreation) to LS/PD-15 (Special Recreation), amendment of the Master Plan of Development for Planned Development 15 to relocate three building sites outside of jurisdictional wetlands (CUP • 2001-.0040), and the amendment of Phase III of Tract Map 2317 to change the location of lots consistent with the Master Plan of Development and create three additional lots (TTM 98013). The project is located at 3900 Traffic Way (APN 049-033-021); and, WHEREAS, the site's General Plan Designation is REC (Recreation) which allows both "L" (Recreation) and "LS" (Special Recreation) as consistent zoning districts; and, WHEREAS, the site's current zoning district is "L" (Recreation); and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to enact this amendment to the Zoning Map to protect the health, safety and welfare of its citizens by applying orderly development of the City; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that this amendment to the Zoning Map will relocate development outside of an area that has been determined to have jurisdictional wetlands present thereby reducing the project's impact; and, . WHEREAS, the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and public notice of environmental documents, as set forth in the State and local guidelines for implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)have been adhered to; and, • 020 ITEM NUMBER: A-2 DATE: 11/27/2001 WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed public hearing upon the subject Zone • Change application was held by the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero at which hearing evidence, oral and documentary, was admitted on behalf of said Zoning amendment; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, at a duly noticed public hearing held on Tuesday, August 21, 2001, considered Zone Change 2001- 0015, after first studying and considering re-certification of Mitigated Negative Declaration 99029 prepared for the project, and, WHEREAS, the Atascadero City Council, at a duly noticed public hearing held on Tuesday, September 6, 2001, considered Zone Change 2001-0015, after first studying and considering re-certification of Mitigated Negative Declaration 99029 prepared for the project, and, NOW, THEREFORE,the City Council takes the following actions: SECTION 1. Findings for Approval of Zone Change 2001-0015: The City Council finds as follows: 1. The proposed zone change is consistent with the General Plan. 2. The proposed zone change will relocate residential development away from sensitive jurisdictional wetlands areas. • SECTION 2. Approval The Atascadero City Council, in a regular session assembled on September 6, 2001, resolved introduce for first reading an ordinance amending the Official Zoning Map for the subject site consistent with the following: 1. Exhibit A: Zone Change Map SECTION 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective a 12:01 a.m. on the 31" day after its final passage. 021 ITEM NUMBER: A-2 DATE: 11/27/2001 • On motion by Council Member Johnson, and seconded by Council Member Clay the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted following roll call vote: AYES: Arrambide, Clay, Johnson, Scalise ( 4 ) NOES: Luna ( 1 ) ABSTAIN: ( ) ABSENT: ( ) ADOPTED: November 27, 2001 By: J. Michael Arrambide, Mayor Attest: • Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk Approved as to form: Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney • 024 ITEM NUMBER: A-2 DATE: 11/27/2001 Exhibit A:Zone Change Map • ZCH 2001-0015 SSF mgn f a - ' Way �a �., R PSF i1SF1+�'sF {J� MINE N ti4 / , r � f S ry t Existing Zoning: L/PD-15 Permanent Open Space Easement to be recorded over New Zoning: LS/PD-15 RSF-X area with final map. • A ITEM NUMBER: A-3 DATE: 11/27/2001 i9.a a �97e Atascadero City Council Staff Report—Public Works Department Final Parcel Map 2001-0016 (AT 01-082) 9900 Santa Lucia Road (Stark/Wilson Land-Surveys) RECOMMENDATION: Council: 1. Accept Final Parcel Map 2001-0016 (AT 01-082); and, 2. Reject without prejudice, the public utility easement (P.U.E) shown on Final Parcel Map 2001-0016. • DISCUSSION: Tentative Parcel Map 2001-0016/AT 01-082 was approved by the Planning Commission on June 19, 2001. The subdivision approved the division of a 7.23-acre lot into two parcels, 4.53 acres (gross area) and 2.70 acres (gross area) each. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 66440 the approving legislative body (City Council) can not deny a final map that is consistent with an approved tentative map. The legislative body is also required to accept, accept subject to improvement or reject, on behalf of the public, any real property offered for dedication for public use in conformity with the terms of the offer of dedication. A Public Utility Easement is being offered on Final Map 2001-0016 to fulfill a Condition of Approval issued by the City Engineer. The City Engineer recommends the City Council reject without prejudice the public utility easement. Staff has determined that the Final Parcel Map is consistent with approved Tentative Parcel Map. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A: Final Tentative Parcel Map 2001-0016 (AT 01- • 082) 024 y ITEM NUMBER: A-3 DATE: 11/27/2001 • Exhibit A Final Parcel Map 2001-0016(AT 01-082) 9900 Santa Lucia Road Stark/Wilson Land Surveys 6 i tk o�l�� G3 :aa o -cgg88abi0 Wa ��y 1 LC!_ 421 411i �• � �� gd7 'ab iLi ^ k m °I F-0 a aQ � U `y CL INN O+ .8 -. s � ■ Z Y P ZE Z WyC lid ii 22 `- a �$E9ft � 3Rp 3yEg S. fj h ti I ! 5 b P -- asS bS Qill� y Y R 4 t 9 y All a E a a J Y3R Rp RLQ oil3 � b bNy. b0 Y N n �j L a0a8aC 94 ei all g y i i s 8 • (�tiJ ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 11/27/2001 1913 1979 Atascadero City Council Staff Report—Public Works Department Final Parcel Map 2001-0014 (AT 01-231) 6350 Navarette Avenue (Neal and Danna Bolton) RECOMMENDATION: Council: 1. Accept Final Parcel Map 2001-0014 (AT 01-231); and, 2. Reject without prejudice,the public utility easement (P.U.E) shown on Final Parcel Map 2001-0014 DISCUSSION: Tentative Parcel Map 2001-0014/AT 01-231 was approved by the Planning Commission on June 19, 2001. The subdivision approved the division two residential lots, totaling 7.87 acres, into four parcels. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 66440 the approving legislative body (City Council) can not deny a final map that is consistent with an approved tentative map. The legislative body is also required to accept, accept subject to improvement or reject, on behalf of the public, any real property offered for dedication for public use in conformity with the terms of the offer of dedication. A Public Utility Easement is being offered on Final Map 2001-0014 to fulfill a Condition of Approval issued by the City Engineer. The City Engineer recommends the City Council reject without prejudice the public utility easement. Staff has determined that the Final Parcel Map is consistent with approved Tentative Parcel Map. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A: Final Tentative Parcel Map 2001-0014 (AT 01- • 231) 026 ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 11/27/2001 • Ilk y F �� a3sbyy �'iislyy ii } 1 U °`� A O OEIOO O �A®9® N I iLl . Iy/1 J Qda.. 4�1tl! � lo"WWW 00 V a Q '�E� ` =a 14 • " pLaa 1 ti a� ^t vIn • }@i 00 �tl r • 0 �� ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 11/27/2001 • Exhibit A Final Parcel Map 2001-0014(AT 01-231) 6350 Navarette Avenue Neal & Danna Bolton - 1 Ah N • 01 � J k: a L9 J � 1 ly I;: � -- Ila 1 e n Ld Cj$ 00 0 • a ITEM NUMBER: C— 1 DATE: 11/27/2001 .AFNr ii® j iais q - , i e Atascadero City Council Staff Report— Community Services Department Appointment of a Youth Representative to the Parks and Recreation Commission RECOMMENDATION: Council appoint Drew Wardlaw as the Youth Representative to the Parks and Recreation Commission for a one-year term, beginning January 1, 2002. DISCUSSION: • The City Council, through the adoption of Resolution No. 2001-045, established a Youth Representative position to the Parks and Recreation Commission. The Youth Representative must be a resident of Atascadero and be between the ages of 14 and 18 years. A recent recruitment for a Youth Representative for the Parks and Recreation Commission yielded one applicant. This applicant was interviewed by a sub-committee of the Parks and Recreation Commission which recommended the appointment of the applicant. A copy of the candidates application is attached. - Staff recommends that the City Council appoint Drew Wardlaw as the Youth Representative to the Parks and Recreation Commission for a one-year term, beginning January 1, 2002. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: Attachment- Candidate's application for the Parks and Recreation Commission Youth • Representative position. 029 Please return to: CITY CLERK ■ on 6500 Palma Avenue NOVq Room 311 leis ° tea NU 12001 • Atascadero,CA 93422 CAD>i�� CITY OF,;'-!. ,- _DEFRU Aer: C r, CITY OF ATASCADERO BOARD, COMMITTEE & COMMISSION APPLICATION (YOUTH REPRESENTATIVE) Please Not you must meet the minimum qualifications of being a registered voter and resident of the City, with the exception of youth representatives who are not required to be registered voters. Minimum qualifications are subject to verification. Please fill out and attach the Supplemental Questionnaire for the advisory body you are applying for. NAME: Drew Home Phone: �'J6b1-ay30 ADDRESS: 33$5' Ca),nvs RSA 4ascaot ra,Ca Work Phone:_ Y�Ohe, 93y 2 Are you a resident of the City of Atascadero? e_5 How Long? 15' v eG.rS EMPLOYMENT: Present or last employer's name, address and phone number: _FQLLAI Y. Vander4.Cyden p- r->.5 �o�- 5-yy- :z3$1 qL11 C,:Jiforr,io, givd. SaV\ Lkis Cibison A L12� EDUCATION: • 14 ia�x SG 1,00) -- S"hioc RELEVANT TRAINING, EXPERIENCE, CERTIFICATES OF TRAINING, LICENSES OR PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION: 100y } e.)ae-J— wi1'4, fC ;hR -t'1," In0Me,)e55 OL ' 6krj%stMa5, 3�'�r5. i_-n GCJ e 7t'6rsruw%, )?C>C- . Glu w,e..,,ber 'FCS'Y r,eX' �aW�y•��tM�j QJ(. J INVOLVEMENT IN COMMUNITY, VOLUNTEER, PROFESSIONAL AND/OR ACADEMIC ORGANIZATIONS: OTHER CITY COMMISSIONS, COMMITTEES OR BOARDS PREVIOUSLY OR CURRENTLY SERVING ON: How did you learn about this vacancy? Newspaper Ad Community Group_Word of Mouth Library_City Hall_Place of Employment_ Other (specify): • This application and supplement are"public documents"and are available for review upon request. Applicants are advised they may be requested to file a Statement of Economic Interest,pursuant to the Fair Political Practices regulations. Information will be provided by the City Clerk. 030 V • CITY OF ATASCADERO SUPPLEMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION -YOUTH REPRESENTATIVE 1. Please explain why you w11 ould like to serve on the Parks & Recreation Commission. Hr�tDP--C$A[�_-.L. wnikja 10PP QL.tt )) P tO CA.t leCAsi- V. LAj1-. df Afa5c.CXjtCO3 Iry Ia,'na 'rt%q :5cIQ12ord- •l LE VOLA I'�% ire OUAr- CcpmynL&ni4-y. 2. What is it about the Parks & Recreation Commission that interests you? What qualities, experience and expertise would you bring to the Commission? \bC (7` 1 O Sn G +l VH my-\ Af oy-\'R- of fi�•e KeeC.s of rke, ICA of Lots of d►j�c—*Are \-- oka e5 -efc>w\ w\V ivy 101vew PA-lt 5t9C1f 's, -$C-kC Cjj CA.V\ et--0,219- oh Q- pc' kc, �..v.o� 12 �Y'e,c�}iov� C.c�w�w,is5iovl O-re. WAV r1\CA.1ZMe. of-CGiSiohS frcvi e- 4f66i lies 3. What role does parks and recreation play in maintaining a healthy city? —�.et�'i�'`-Q� ;.n�c� tro�.�.)'i�e. car O�Y't�la 5. Z-'�" r�tf ��J i G�P.S c.� ►:J IGc.G� ToY' their Q-In etlra�4 /41$C>- i OT-OV I S j21C-,.CC0s ixh d GtG-�-ivi-}ieS for tke Gi}ize,ns ci Alas deo --c, g'le, - • o 031 Supplemental Questionnaire • Parks & Recreation Commission - Youth Representative Page 2 4. How would you see your role as a member of the Commission? +� Z '}"�'►i h� = w� . �GC �2 'f'e.r�,f"�S�vi'�iv�a �"�. io t,n.1 4. r� t Sow.coh� 1, a a�e5��o►, c�6o�.��' a� �6� c " "Inc..+ OtemI5 T- co�cicl ave c��e� i� Cdr 71,ew� . 5. In your opinion, what are Atascadero's greatest public recreation needs? IT 11'W" VO"j-11 C eyl� r1\0t a. a 1 u.Gie, -co Ir a i rt5 fo Vr 1d 6. What methods should be used to fund Atascadero's public recreation programs and facilities? AS iha -FQ, Io cc,f ��L,,inf< e5 -1-0 t rxR sao'" ey e v�fS 032 • Supplemental Application Parks & Recreation Commission - Youth Representative Page 3 7. If appointed, what specific goals would you like to see the Commission achieve? Z wC., C) s C' CLrVt tl-,a.f a 10r.vs �Zi S --o rr'r 'e iY' Oze,S fil' 8. If there is additional information you would like to share about yourself, please use the following space provided (optionall. I hereby certify that the foregoing information is true and correct. Signature: art Date: 033 ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 11/27/2001 • iais� � 1979 Atascadero City Council Staff Report — Public Works Department West Mall Closure RECOMMENDATION: Council set a Public Hearing to consider the request from Atascadero Unified School District for the closure of West Mall between Lewis Avenue and Olmeda Avenue during Atascadero Junior High School hours. DISCUSSION: Background: Atascadero Junior High School is located on the north side of Lewis Avenue and • is bisected by West Mall (see enclosed project map). The Atascadero Unified School District has requested closure of West Mall between Lewis Avenue and Olmeda Avenue during Atascadero Junior High School hours (see attached letter). A large number of students cross West Mall during the school day to get to classes on the other side of the road. The School is concerned about abductions of students and the potential of accidents with cars during the crossing of the road. The details of the closure would be: • Gates or barricades on West Mall at Lewis Ave and Olmeda Ave. These devices would be provided by the School District and would be their responsibility to open and close. They would be opened and closed at a regular time each school day. • Installation of a 4-way stop at West Mall and Lewis Ave and the removal of the mid block crosswalk on West Mall between Lewis Avenue and Olmeda Avenue. • Public Hearing with proper notification for the closure and sidewalk elimination. Analysis: Staff studied the effect of this closure on circulation. There are several alternative routes to the traveling public when West Mall is closed. The closure of West Mall during school hours will cause a slight increase in traffic volumes of the alternative routes. The roads have the • capacity to handle the additional trips. Circulation around the Junior High School is congested at the morning drop off and afternoon pick up. The City has requested that the School use the closed section of West Mall for drop off 034 ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 11/27/2001 and pick up. The City and the School will continue to work on circulation and drop off and pick • up zones to help mitigate the congestion. Conclusion: The closure appears to not be detrimental to City circulation and is a benefit to the school. It is recommended that the impacts to the City of Atascadero be closely monitored. If circulation or other problems arise due to the closure the City Council may vote to revoke the closure or require further mitigations to help the circulation. FISCAL IMPACT: Approximately $500.00 for the installation of the 4-way stop at West Mall and Lewis Avenue and the removal of the crosswalk striping. ALTERNATIVES: ` None ATTACHMENTS: . Attachment 1. Project Map, Attachment 2. Letter from Atascadero Unified School District 035 DOWNTOWN CIRCULATION x3 GEflE� i � r4 0 f N A •..as it 3 �' is 0000 000 � . 0000 q 0000 B00 "" y 3 0 ® 00 %a 0000 = t " 'OLMEQA'AYE w C7 Lup a K U)Lu 3 ®® Lu } W �$ O ulzLF � Q �, FircN A 101.x. s Atascadero Unified School District _ 5601 WEST MALL • ATASCADERO,CALIFORNIA 93422 - DISTRICT OFFICE 805)462-4200 • FAX (805)462-4421 -; James L. Stecher, Superintendent NOV 0 8 2001 November 7, 2001 ^C► (C;: A�i��.pi: `� a� Mr. Wade McKinney City Manager/City of Atascadero 6500 Palma Avenue Atascadero, CA 93422 Dear Mr. McKinney, As you know, student safety is an ongoing mutual concern. Many City-Schools projects are underway or have been completed which address the safety of our students on their way to and from school, and also during the school day. Your cooperation and leadership in our common efforts is greatly appreciated. As discussed at our last City-Schools Meeting, we have a major safety issue which needs to be addressed in a timely fashion- the traffic pattern between the campuses of Atascadero Junior High School on West Mall. While the school district fully supports the future building of the Lewis Avenue Bridge and will fully cooperate with the City to see this project funded, we also recognize that the • request to address the issue above needs immediate attention and must not be linked together with the bridge project. After significant review, analysis and discussion, and to expedite a solution to this safety concern, I am requesting that the City Council consider the closing of a portion of West Mall between Lewis Avenue and Olmeda Avenue during the school day and that this item be placed on the City Council's next agenda for discussion and possible action. Thank you in advance for your assistance. If you have any questions or suggestions, please feel free to call me. Please notify me of the date and time of the meeting where this item will be considered and I will plan to attend. Si erely, JAMES L. STECHER District Superintendent cc: Board of Trustees District Leadership Team PADATA\CITYSCHI.\regcloswm.wpd • Carrisa Plains Elementary Creston Elementary • Monterey Road Elementary • San Benito Road Elementary San Gabriel Road Elementary • Santa Margarita Elementary • Santa Rosa Academic Academy Atascadero Fine Arts Academy • Atascadero Junior High School Atascadero High School Westside Continuation High School • West Mall Alternative School Atascadero Adult School 037 ITEM NUMBER: C-3 DATE: 11/27/2001 1918 m 19 9 Atascadero City Council Staff Report — Public Works Department 2002 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Project Funding RECOMMENDATION: Council consider San Luis Obispo Council of Governments request that Atascadero's 2002 State Transportation Improvement Program "Local Choice" funds of$423,000.00 be used as a match for the SR 41/US 101 Interchange Replacement Project. DISCUSSION: On June 26, 2001, Council reviewed a list of public works projects for which applications for 2002 • STIP funding could be submitted.- Applications were submitted to SLOCOG on September 5, 2001 for these projects. On November 7, 2001 the San Luis Obispo Council of Governments Board (SLOCOG) voted on the Highway Projects portions on the STIP. City Staff has received the SLOCOG Staff recommendations on the remaining categories of the STIP. These projects will be voted on by SLOCOG on December 5. The project name, amount of requested STIP funds, the amount and source of local matching funds and the amounts being recommended by SLOCOG are listed below. FRecornmended mended by Project Pr Amountmount City Match Funding Source Requested Street Overlay Projects at Various $40,000 Local Choice Locations (LTF) $ 423,000 Downtown Circulation, Pedestrian and $80,000 Enhancement Landscaping Improvement (Redevelopment) 400,000 163,000 $440,000 Regional Lewis Avenue Bridge (TEA 21) Significance $ 1,000,000 - $150,000 Enhancement (Impact Fees) $ 482,000 • State Highway SR41 / US 101 Interchange Shortfall sol Improvements $ 6,000,000 $ 3,250,000 Local Choice 1 $ - $ 423,000 ' * 038 ITEM NUMBER: C-3 DATE: 11/27/2001 * SLOCOG and State to fund remainder with other funds • Listed below is a summary of the SLOCOG board vote and SLOCOG staff recommendations for the entire STIP: CATEGORY AMOUNT State Highway $18,862,000.00 Routes of Regional Significance $5,414,000.00 Local Choice $4,324,000.00 Enhancement Projects $3,196,000.00 Transit, ITS & rail Projects $1,272,000.00 Previous Committed Funding SEE NOTE 1 $3,132,000.00 Other SEE NOTE 2 $885,000.00 Reserve SEE NOTE 3 $1,397,000.00 Total $38,482,000.00 Note 1: Funds set aside for previous commitments,cost savings,reimbursements and reprogrammed funds Note 2: SCAT funding Note 3: Funds recommended being reserved for future projects Attached is the SLOCOG staff report on this subject with greater detail on the selection process. Staff is disappointed with the SLOCOG Board vote and SLOCOG Staff recommendations for the • following reasons: • Using $423,000.00 of"Local Choice" funds for the SR 41/US 101 project. "Local Choice Funds" are entitlement funds which belong to the City of Atascadero for any road project designated by Council. These funds are badly needed for local road rehabilitation or an increased local match for the Lewis Bridge. SR 41/US 101 is a State-to-State interchange and should be funded by the State. • Counting the SR 41/US 101 shortfall "against" the City Of Atascadero "percentage" of the STIP. This is a State-to-State route, yet Caltrans and SLOCOG did not nominate the shortfall to the STIP. The State has finished the SR 41 realignment and has increased volumes to this interchange. • Lack of support of the Lewis Ave Bridge by SLOCOG staff. This project has a Federal and local match, is needed for local circulation, will reduce vehicle trips to El Camino Real and the SR 41/ US 101 interchange, help revitalize Atascadero Downtown and continue a pedestrian and bicycle corridor. This project should have scored much higher on the "Ranking Criteria". City Staff is continuing to work with the SLOCOG and Caltrans Staff on this issue. Staff will have additional information at the City Council meeting. is 039 i ITEM NUMBER: C-3 DATE: 11/27/2001 • FISCAL IMPACT: $423,000.00 of STIP funds toward a State Project or the City of Atascadero's "Local Choice" project. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1: December 5, 2001 SLOCOG Staff report on the 2002 RTIP Attachment 2: Information on the SR 41/US 101 Interchange reconstruction project from the November 7, 2001 Staff report on the 2002 RTIP • 040 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS STAFF REPORT DATE, DECEMBER 5;2001 • SUBJECT 2002 Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP)Recommended YFunding' SUMMARY A total of $38.482 million is available to SLOCOG for programming projects in the 2002 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). After making adjustments for previous commitments, cost savings reimbursements, and reprogrammed funds, an adjusted total of $35.35 million is available for programming. The California Transportation Commission (CTC) requires regional project submittals by December 15, 2001. The schedule, funding targets, and criteria were reviewed and approved by your Board at previous Board hearings since April. In October, the SLOCOG Board approved targeted funding for several categories of transportation projects as shown on Table A, and in November tentatively approved the list of State Highway projects. This report identifies recommended funding in the Routes of Regional Significance, Enhancement, Local Choice, and the ITS, Rail and Transit categories. • Table B is a Summary of Funding By Jurisdiction • Table C is a Summary of Funding over Several Programming Cycles • Table D is a Summary of Recommended Projects on Routes of Regional Significance • Table E is a Summary of Recommended Transportation Enhancement projects • Table F is a Summary of Recommended ITS, Rail and Transit projects. • Table G is a Summary of State Highway Projects tentatively approved in November • Table H is a Summary of Recommended Local Choice Projects Individual "Project Sheets" describing the specific requests and the "Recommended Funding Levels and Conditions" are included with this report to describe the various proposals. • State Highway project programming is recommended at a total of$18,862,000 for 12 projects • Projects on Routes of Regional Significance are recommended at a total of$5,414,000 for 11 projects • Enhancement project programming is recommended at a total of$3,196,000 for 12 projects. One project (San Miguel) is proposed to be funded from federal Transportation Enhancement(TE) monies. • ITS, Rail and Transit project programming is recommended at a total of$1,272,546 for 9 projects. • Local Choice project programming is recommended at a total of$3,721,000. • Total funding recommended in this RTIP Cycle is $33,953,000, leaving $ 1,397,000 in reserve. The attached recommendations exceed the targets by $968,000 in the Routes of Regional Significance Category and by $90,000 in the Enhancement Category. Recommended funding is below the target by $125,000 in the ITS, Rail and Transit Category. Programming recommendations are based on adopted criteria, rated by seven planners and equity considerations were applied in this cycle evaluating funding over the period from 1990 to 2002 with consideration of anticipated needs in the upcoming 2004 funding cycle. RECOMMENDATION Staff: 1. Adopt a resolution programming various Routes of Regional Significance, Enhancement, ITS, Rail and Transit, Local Choice, and State Highway projects as shown on Tables D through G. 2. Approve individual project recommendations and conditions of approval as noted on the individual project description sheets in Attachment A. 3. Integrate projects into Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP) as necessary. TTAC: CTAC: A-2-1 U 4 1 DISCUSSION Table A shows the breakdown of funding by category for this Regional Transportation Improvement Program •(RTIP) cycle. Table A REQUESTED yrs,. --_ R; CATEGORYr i 1 x ,L- �, <ADOPTED=d r x rt PERCENT. FUNDING ,a . ti� TARGET AMTS i y ., .. . ..., •?. .,<w:x.. ',�,_;; ,..� .. �` --.�:i � �. ,, �� ,:�$ yti1 ll 3535 . , State Highway improvements 65% $22.37m_ ion Local Projects 22% $8.29m Routes of Reg.Significance(competitive) (11%) $9.6m Local Choice(formula) ($4.45m) (11%) $3.84m ($3.84m) Enhancement Projects(Transportation Only) 9% $6.6m $3.29m Transit,ITS&Rail Projects 4% $3.3m $1.40m Previously Committed Funding .($3.3m) (Included above} Table B shows a summary of all the categories by.recipient. This table also addresses funding distribution among agencies in this cycle and over the past decade for all funding types. The following tables summarize the relative scores and staff recommendations for each funding category. The project sheets are organized by jurisdiction to allow the reader to focus on each agency's projects. • • A-2-2 042 Table B Summary by Jurisdiction :: - • "ftecaiiuurfea Jurlsrlldlan Project T-We RTtP Category Phase Local Match OtAa FiaWs Project Cost RT1P Request Arlo n,6cande OR ME NI .iirf. A:.Y.s � == .. V .mow. ._ ... 1 Arroyo Grande E.Branch Stredsce Erhaxanert PSdE Cortst. SS7ACo sD 5497,000 3440,000 >` Mayo Grande E.Grand Ave Revtatzation Erk".emert PSaE Const. $594.600 $438.800 $1X83,400 i Branch A®Road. Arroyo Grande repeirbvertey Local Char N $0 m $244,000 3244.000 :f'•: :<';; l?.j ,Oti<] :. Arroyo Grande The Pace Local Choice N f0 $679,004 $43,000 ? i30(iD- - Lewis Avenue Bridge .:_:...:::..::.:.:•;"•- r Nascadero Ei>hencertwts Enhancement N 3/so,000 $440,000 52AnPW $482.000 ECR BeaWration a Ped. - - Nazeadero krps.Ph2 Enhancement N 3m,000 3279,000 5422,000 3400.000�::::<::::......;:�57A00 Rates of Reg - �" Nazcadero Lewis Ave Bridge SfSXifrence N 1150,000 3440:000 52,072,000 57,000.000 Nastaduo R 41 1101 kterchange Local Choice Curt. SO 315,396,000 515,819,000 $423,000;.`: >: :`S327A40 t I W-001:1 ` � a +1z� e -r-L- 00"A 25Nr `gP 5/ Schcds and Perks %;:;>;: ::<:>::>::a>:... - -' Grover Beech Enhancement Ert�aneertrrt N $10494 m S69s.000 5591,f7C0;ii:iii2i%t5:' ?ii 1 S.41h-Grand to Farrel- Rates of Reg Grover Beach N $66.113 $0 $441,113 5774,640 ...: 775;Ok][1 Rehab Slgrif'cencro _ Grover Beach N.Oak Park• Supplemental All $0 $1207= $1,649,000 $401.234 5400 ow Wideninq and I (socio Rales of Reg • Graver,PWro,Gro,SLO Co. The Pd e.rermstrud rKenca Cana. 556,755 30 5645,755 $549,000 55d$01A1 S.40 Sl.(Farrol to Grover Beach Local Choice N $54.000 $O 5430,000 $326157 Fye ler d)d tvt20 j' S1L6 451 - Walerfrort Brdwai b Ge. Morro gay Enhancement Cm3. S1,607A00 $227,000 8.734,000 $500,000 :fSDQ;o� i zn Coastal Moro Bay Erhancanert N to m $7s,600 s7s oe6 Lateral PedastrS7sgoa Acoess keys :. Morro gay Mena Rd a MBey Blvd Rales Rourdebal Sloriierxe of Reg Coni. $94,500 $113,000 5585.000 $50$,000 S B;SE�J Various FAU 59Ne Rood Local Cho;-.a ars. $a 5 ,000 3608,000 Marro Bar .::...........:. 6M`v Pa Grl:a� p y L ee4Q 'w a y. 91 E*n: y'? t T43d4000 1 :.. �. _. :-�._ .... - Perk and Ride Ld Paso Robles ( t ) Erhsurtwt N fo $D 51AOOA00 Sl,000,000 i Safety Measures In School Paso Robles Zones Er•l+ance'no t N Paso Robles 241h Stied RR Routes of Reg Cveraossng Slgircen« PSaE 5200,000 $o fsoo.000 s3o7,o60 ;: RRoutes at Reg ..... a :.:..:.::...::. Paso Robles 130St.&idge Skrircarce Cana. 313250,000 m ft4000,000 St,Cg0,000 <::::55EFI1Oq Paso Rodes Paving Retabbialim Local Choice N X7 $0 $404.000 5464,000 S;gr-A Syrrtya-calyon of Transit,Rd Al 35170 S d R $0 $0 .000 Peso Robles 17th Stred Cerrldcc Projects Paso Robles N.Co.Trors.Cyr &hancernert Al 30 $0 85,000 3250.000 moi;J 1 1 • A-2-3 043 Table B (continued) _ Summary by Jurisdiction JtrbrBct$an Psaleet Title RTtP Cetegory Ph4se Lae.1 Metch Other Fade RTIP Request LisK _ Project Cost_ .�, :a :c> Beach Man St.Promenade Prase Enhercertwt Cann.• f28.75o $250.0m 5750,000 $1 9,000 Sk2RA N Pismo BeachrCaves Perk ta+pravanert Strad Rales of Reg Card. $50,000 $I $21],000 $325,1700 s�+nce Re 51ti7A0q i Ramo Beech - 4th St.Mprow veaisRodesolltCorot. <:a;;::>:::..:.�...:..:. s7ftancef0 SD T352,t700 =I"33 p Beech TraffcSi Carrosim Lard d.Choice P58E Ca $7 30 $14,000 $14.000 MUM Beech 4th St. Irprovemert:. Lad Choice Al fo $0 $87,810 $87,810 f Curb/g.Cer7sAv 7 bAv ..Sa3;8.1_:_ Plum Beach Street Rehab pre4eds Local Choice Corot. f0 50 %':::% _ 5167,000 >t7It :? I Ft. Beech LID Traffic Sigel irersst,RSBRd Conversion Projects Cam' 30 3o i55j'96 355 96::; gm.'...... Sen Luis Obispo Phase 1 R.4road sefdy Erherctrnert PAGED PSdE 30 f0 1350,000 '> Trd 5350.000 S3$Q,GM 1 San Lis Obispo Sinsh3r>cr Sand Access N so $on TJSa,Cm $3so,000 Trd SA Sm Luis Otis P=4 1 Los Osas Vetey ...........:. --. -� po EMrceme t PSBE Cant. so So 3150.000 3150,000 Rd.Meson Sen LSis Oaspo CkckC Road Rotes of Reg $SOCA Uy$I7Ck - e g sq irca ce Al So RSttA 31.270.00a 5600,000 560UAC0 j San LU3 Cti po Sante BerberAv Barbara e. Rts of Rey Al Wida" SigiflcernefLc $112,000 $0 1155,000 3375.000 - S48Tj10q Soh Luis Compo Monterey St.Rehab Local once Al 325.000 m 525,000 usa,000 S35RA .. 1 San Luis odsPo &oad St.S" TrwL-A.RS 8 Rd, knpra.emerts Loc Choice Cord. $I 545,000 $45,000 Sen Luis Cbispo Same Rase St.ITS S!gM Trani,RS 6 Rd, - Ywovemeris I=Choice Cord' m 567,000 $67,000 > S6TAOt1 1 Sen Luis Obispo Regard Fare Peas Trarnt,ITS d Rd Cap.Interface Projects Acquition $0 y7 Sb500p 565,000 r Sen L� � Bt-Rd ata@dion Trenst,ITS 6 Rd Cap. 50 $41.400 Oda) 33W 000 "8,600 Rayed: ACgU:tknS1gtFA0q i - �.:: AOCo.Oen.Services Bob JonesPWwey Ereancemert PAJEO $807,000 $0 (807,000M,00() Corot. ' . SLO Co.P1 Sen Nig1+d•Missim Shed arwq &twxcn ezts fed.TE F.-ds Carts. $0 30 3280.000 5280,000 SZHQ Q AO Co.P&-q Cambria.Main Ped E. ftnert. At $0 $0 TOO $515,(X)0 1 Ertmnamats 52 5 a AO Co. Put4eN.brks LOVR Ram;dim(1.4 Ratetska A! 5185,179 $0 $185,179 $975,678 SLOG. Pttk Works Turk F. Rd Safely,end Rates of Reg At $o $0 $969000 $1,932,000 OA l 5455.8.. I rgrovemcrls 'reerce AO CO. RocNk7rks LooBaro,•Tvnkrhp Rahl�oM1ca1119 carat. 1125,000 $on 561s,000 $469,sr7o < S430AC>D ' i AO Co. PltkVAcrks 5cU%dRoad DkeLanes Local Choice Al =5,W0 $0 5205.01X1 3355,000 s S355UtSl SLOGi Pttiic Wats Teck form Rd Safety aro Local Choice Cana. 30 f0 5355,000 $150,000 SLOG. PAC Warks Street ftehab$elion Local C+oce Cad. f0 f0 5742 - meas 904 3742,9G ST42 9Q4 SLO Co. Nick VVo ks Y'dO Odedas•LOVR,S. Trarst,ITS B Rd Cad. $ 000 m 269 3 ,000 $219• S2S3A _ Ba Te1M1 Roieds .. � z-.v sear^ 3•z: ie-yl� ,a,:.,,c+rle, - �'1' '' ::.." z�spa .,21:; a•'�," mrx-jO�e- rri.'�$Z80'0 SCAT Replace 21uses T.1.kCs Rd C.P. $124,176 $0 $124,176 $416,706 j:p06a M"*m-- r`-a"'ri.R 51 Mil A as•.�_.1,t. Y 1 .. ySLORTA Replace 4 buses- Trerst,rtSBRai Cep. $427;68 $7 $42768 $793,499 Rai• sz';i ;is(�Q',Q -' I c' s AcgJaion AORTA RideshareRogan StaleNwYs 3500.000 $$W,000 SSt1tFA i 1 i I k"' [�ilCb'Glqpc <,~'::W-A-MEMw, i ` t�>ku?�Rr3d8b� t AOCOO Rd Sidi, Frgrovemrrts Trent,RSBRd Coal $0 $4.900,000 14,900.000 $100,000 iSSBa Of1� �1?� Rcjeas SaOO Programming and State ttns 5365.000 1'385.000 S38sA00 A-2-4 044 Fr( . .c _. • '••:�U.. ...'-..._.:•i:.gyp.:... }R X'.�:.:'�.:.:.Ll..::.' •:: 1 I E — 1- i :: :::. ::.:. ► i - - io �% � 00000.. m Irii ac: N m m: ml i'n i l % : I OUlpullj'0J o! �' rncr cd". /At!J ZOOZ' r, y�l NI N! :cq ff 1 . I , • .... : .0&Qk::....... ........ . =Win•:::.:?a:::::C7::::: ri:•:i::�'::•ia' i o! f ..... = 6u!putlj 0, %' c °oi': O � ri o I! I I I :r.. /A!J OOOZ066L'i ! I t I 7 LrNN... .'..•......•:.•:.•z:..4..'.s:....l... ::::•::::.::�::.'.vor..••:::::...::. ^2.-.• •• ' 1... .2_ : 1 . ::.•...:. .... ... I ::v:::.:.::...rXa.t:.'�::i::.:::•.:Xsl:'•::::•r:.�rn�:•.:::.::.•::::..�rr...�:.::'�.:ti.. i' !1iw I I i'Lo'"Q'%iI I _ I II i(i ' ' ... N.'. C : dI1S LLL, ZOOZ IVlplIR le - N t° .O N O O •.f: m I I� � 1 Pl N O 1� tl�(t C'1 r m m slel0l dllS ZOOZ � ,oi « "R o n ^ ,^ o N mm _ ^ I,�j di NI N r a c V Ir « tnl u�0i L ? M cn a m �^ m SIU' O Ha. ImWt+-t1 U o IIgw aalago le:)o Ql i C m'N 1 W Jaylp H y I »y n ViU o 'm i m itn Y E E E N'cn E $ a' I min. r O o 0 0 �o �: I 1 - O001 C OI N I ! N I mI N. m 17 1 ti o f o m I C.7 I to O' 1 y sauloa 1¢u016aa' F;, kk, I cn ( �! i O U r ! i -- -- - ---?- - =-! - I uQi l I C3! N o 0 0� oo '^: o sluauiaaueyu3 j HI w H ' �' »i I v^oi� ��0I m,m m N I I CL ! o ll$u¢j 'g 11et!/Sli I 1 I ^ N. N w i Ni VIS0-1 ' m: I 9T; a Q Q N o �I of ul C a a H N I FI �+j O NI E� J Q p N 0 � I Q aI VI tl� C; A 0 046 a i -- - I o � o o c- eo v_ o I - m _ ? 0$ 0009L6$ geq@H HAO1 Lori roi LLoo v o CO v Leri M I .... m Lri r _ eopu8 00 o CF) M m v Ln m 0$ 000'000'LS Q o m Q o Ln Q Fm any Sma1 cC6r� of ri ` CN . sd0 "�p 000'06,7$ 000'06,7$ ov f ��+ chi tti >cn c i d PHsan8 solo k° � Fr�E� M V. geyaZl 000`SL£$ 000'9LE$ 0 Lilt? S JanaS Boz Ln m„ co �lvt X09 L 000`696$ 00' E6'l$ O .SdO 0 PSI weed�1Uel I ---- - --- — cn tai Rx a ; — O 6UIUap� aQ t n *o� km tc 000`SL£$ 00d9LE$ W eje je8 e3S �nogepuno o o, ;r, m T Zi g= cr, c� cv C 000`Z5Z$ codzs;Z$ T Pb euelump oA *� '} ma Ml �.« ,� C7 t`n 000`6,7S$ —000'6,79$ geLpH @M!d ay1 C0,4 7t" z5 o Iuawanojdwl gyN 03 • 00o`ZS£$ 00o'Z9E$ a IS 43b owsld of OOObO£$ 000'00£$ a DO 6H I y3bZ 0 6uluaplM �' � Ln" 000`009$ 000'009$ P2jnoj0 K 30 ' 000`051$ 000'000'L$ a a6pu8 3S 43E l ,o cvt o, , �r � t1iLa p }: t. iv m -^t >k' •-.'XY:Z(Ds ' -kms d. .. ............ ... � Sid xe�y � � � � � � � :='• � c C C3 �' U1 p r. •a 'r ,.r � CC E E z w cn cu }.� cu u CU 0 E OL ui •� �c tn:r �ya4 o2S;' � - C7 N o m i to C) � Y fa V r s•Lt .�e"Era i ch7. iV��rg�y �- to a " "r��i _ • i I ............. ........... ......................... 047 .:.:... :::::.:�.: 0 0 I 0 I CIL Cr I ( E I N • f O$ 000'OSZ$ a IS ewd selgoa osed n :.. cm cri El •'Oo ssa» ^* $ 000'OS£s F y }: 100143S>awla SUI N CO O tri Q ^ '••• :•: O$ 000'00Ss REsauoz v 0o a sa o ose o ui •: 1 4 S Iq a d �, Q Ld IN v 0$ Coo'ZHds < a6pug any slrna-1 °' a' X- :.: N ¢i A v >: 000'08L$ 000'L6Ss vm anojdwl rte„ Com., 3I1ed'8 IOo43S H9 _ •p 000 OSL$ 000'09Ls v sauela)flH pu 1a41a9 rn sluawanojdwl 7 7 a 000 E9L$ 000'00Ds < uo!ieiadp•g a3ueyu3 m u Lc3 Pad leas oulw¢3 13 000 SLZ$ 000'SLSs v 83ue4u3 �i 1%"M IS Weld ueljgweo r �`fi1 000 OZY$ 000'69Z'Ls a (p as¢4d) icnl' yin opeuaLuOld awsld rn �- 3 � >> W ...................... .................. � - ��.�K ^rte.. •r• w 000'009$ 000'OVds a ad¢Os;aailS a6e t s� '� � " .r- � u ^, i •� .................. .._........ o .... �i.�h SP1• _ i/+r. ',• 000OSL$ 000'091,s sue a co :''•: coua 1P YJ E 4d 21/�Ol cv c T` av 3 Q �1 ? CN111 ..................... i 7 ♦x 0 coo'em 000'OSZs < u011ezllellnaa puejg M L 000 OS£$ 000'OSEs c0„ P¢0�11¢a E ase4d IOIS1w = y.� Q' rrt -15-1111 U 000'E9L$ 000'SLES d sauawanajdwl "OM + "` ^ pad san¢�mesoul0 : r f' ? :w' 7 ova N - ssaood j '*' ,•rp ' ws c ' 000'SLS$ 000'SLSs (¢ueoJ/)IleiApICN eoH �m�• ,�, r '' : . LuoJliai¢M Hl^1 n:sts r O 000 00£$ 000'OOe$ V /Cern a sauo o s, 41 d ('g 8 4� �� .�� Q — - - - Y �.Y:�'.x:a::• ,�� :�:�]C)�{7,.y} ...................../it6� '�.`ii�'• CSC:$' V ........ .....................�.. .S :15 3'.1 .l•....Y 't': �'1X..'� 1 sid'x2W o �, - ---- - - — E R. E m Woe 7, 41M VEN lo-in C gigU. Q 048 4 _ i 0 so coi M J0pw00 JaaJlS y1£6 Jo Q Q m `cd ^ `•' I E 0$ 000'OO9$ a uollez!uaJyOu(S!¢146!8 r` mc i ca o N O apeJ6dn m N n o I f 0$ 000'89$ xogaJe_q o!uapal� m co of m r :::.. r - , u0!�e6!i!geyab �, c� 000'001,$ 009,91,E$ sn8 OlS o> ? �o c+ L i N O s;uawanoJdwl 000 Sb$ 000 sm leu6!S-3S Peolg CL o Wal'des.S'HA01 mac" ., 000 6LZ$ 000'£9ZS _sJ'opaMl oaplA — (l)sleu6!S�!0 Ilt/ y- �: 3'�'r v -P 96z' o2S 96Z'SS$ 96Z'SS$ a -uolstanuo0 leu6lS :67 �` ,yr" '� 3B E 3WeJl 031-owsldco i s;uawanoJdwl O 000'1,9$ 000'1,98 - Ieu6!S Sll JOP!JJOJ c c`a-qcn , v; -1, esoa ewes 'moi c s r « ,_-• �:, V. .' Q sasnq g, v `� � i N .f2 (100,00Z$ 90L'961rS v Zn: ?�. m s ;Iq'i I Q Cd cnLU Z eoeldaa 11fJS t.- s s• i,:G ap _ Q o: tc: Z g m. sasnq to,� � 4,9.' d 000 08Z$ 66D'£6L$ o q 83eldaa 171ii01Slug CL no a uno n m 1 9 P t!P !8mss., I 000 9Z1$ OOS'ZSZ$ :2AesWj V Pb euejuln0 :-i_ '�r) 'o'' U — o (143!!¢9 Jepualle:) 000'006$ 000'OO6S o '1�115)sivawanoJdw! "cy2 `j In � r 4 out P!S P21d f N C:) s;d XeW o4 N ory I c oalbr '. r E E a� c a y .rift.aj .Jam rt C O F�i C V2/ d "V] DC7 Qi C4-,f. A o n 1 e Y�Cti a I{ 715. I 049 --� • A_C LL in C3 c 3M � ._o o : e u o o o c -oo o. c o X o v o c u c - o 0 0 ClC ss o o d A c o C oC c m LO o o �° cm n� ci cv a oen M ICUVscc H. io _ .n j = f c I m d W a .. is iv E *a s:• c Q a v �o X. O O 0 O p OO O O p O O i Q O O C O O o O Cl G O p O O O O I C o o � o ai _ o R. O v v N t[I O p O n al -1 o LL !� m m O O 67 N m O f7 O p 47 yd _ N Qf ^ O v N v m O m �= H H H � H o O a O p O p i �.1..r N o 0 o O_ o 'C cu r 0 o O o p O ar LNO'. O H H H f7 07 H H _O C3 cm C3 CD CO. CD LL C4 C3 C3 H H H N H p 1 v m ^ r H H H H 1 .L N = O O O O O O p p p 7 O O p0 O O O a p 00 p d i LL O p r O Qf h-• O v t— rn _ /•� d O O cn H ^ O 6f N H m O n N H H *A, N co blo H H H H v H N _ _ H O CL -0 p O O o r d O 00 p C O O O O O 0 0 0 O G N d O C:) 0 C O p O O O O O O O O Qf Q CL LL O O n O O p O O O'a �f/ < 7 P)to Q 0 C3 m O � 0 O � r•• Q' H H H C:L C3 co N H H N N 3 N 3 y CD a A c � _ � c UW P U w Ow m o v' `'' I N L o Q W o o U o O '6 to W 'd °6 , °6 to co co E � CL U aNU U aU da O -6Cf) a da < (L U Q a 00 a a o = of a CL o o `o o -- N c N C (A N d N U <O p m L' N N c O N N Q m`• N cm C c C CA cn d 0 C N c c t a 4. �a <° a v a '° y c N m O N o c8 c . f•n C V C J CL •O Om C L O la O� C c c f.�. :3 U-) a 2 N m m -Nfu oo c co m ( d No ` a m c o o °' N n N d N c c cm 0 Q o U E m m W N O °� m o rn`6 v c F •O v nN m � Cn E oa c M c rn O C m — o �a v n a O c `c t of 47 in ai rn v d j S io U o c o o � E m m m y u o o a o LL dis m L W U o (� U o �' m N ce ou `—' co n o c m o o U =' — v m WE 'o v m a? o o m c� cc c m c o F C) ar w m 0 m — o c CL N c f0 O — O Q q C3 ` O N R (7 c 0 = of a� m � o a o m w o aiu- a � 1 C � :3 a I Q' CY cr Vl N C Z m C c 00 y H N N N U' U' _ .O C C O O L y 7 7 O @ O a f0 O O N a W l4 U U Q v ci v ¢ � ¢cv a c a m � i :. r o 0 0 0 0 0 c c C4 cn C4 cn i • �.J_.:::. .::.:•:. •:::'i:: •.•i:.:• :::•1::: :iif::: w.f•::. :::.j:i:•: :•::':is J:.�:i. •::ii::i :i:'i:: •:::'•::.-- ::ti•::•::• 050 j i_ I ! i ! I i I ! ! I • I - TI •. pl O pi O O(O O OI OCD C:):0 OOI O O10 yi I` O O O) O Q:C:) O O� O: Olp CD'. O,O, O CD �! G O: O.O O O p O O± O`:. p!p O 010; O CD C) C*�i �7I r ti O l r It 1 Ch �i O�� 1�I O I N i r �Y Ln j E� E cv, �Iv ch p(v p rf Ot oo rrol m = ti m cn coo o N 69(EA' '� 69 69 I ;�; Ea i 69 69 69 69 ! I ! 1d o! c' of i coj a)C/II•N'� I I j ca a ca of o >o) o! d' > Q CO o ca o j m ; Cfl �` !L; o o;u >,; �f �o ; r = 0. s j I cn' tee. u� L' ca ca 1 �I ± 2 o° U± o a� cn c c tI o, o �I-aI Ca) cn ! a o o ± ca >� ca V v Z I a o ca s ca; o o : m cn I v� c ca ` o o Z! 2� W Z'2 I ca a) m a). >o d a�; m; cu ± i !zl ca ca ca I Q ca ca( ca as. ca ca ca ca ca 1 a)l o ca ca ca ca ca 1 ca' t m ca a) ca ca ca i �e Is tr__ a' S sI �! r W. t a� t tl •- CU a) Y a)I a)': 0IW. a) a)`` a) a) a)` �cr !Y cr_ =3 O 0I !Y; ZIJ Ma crI�i � �I�I ': I <y j cu ± ! I I ! •O. I I i I 1 ' V O O� O I O O' O; CD O! p O O O O O; O" C3 CDi V Oj Oi O O O O� 0 Go O U Crl I I O I N I v; rn l N I N O CV, O! M O O; COI co J i co �r I CN v 69 FFi b9 69 69I 69 I 69 0 O j O I s I 03 �-•i z,, Oi C m m ► ± CD l o Uj 00 I �! n7f f O U R1j O aI +, i NI I j ± •O 1 CL N ! J � . • 051 2002 RTIP Projects Project Title: SR 41/ US 101 Interchange Reconstruction Jurisdiction: City of Atascadero Funding Request: $6,850,000 -- Recommendations/Conditions: 1) Continue to December to assess final design modifications to lower •proiect cost; 2) require the City's dedication of RTIP 2002 local choice funds of $423,000 for an equivalent amount from other local sources)to the project budget. Project Description— Scope: the project involves the US 101 bridge replacement (will accommodate future 6 lanes— needed now to keep 2 lanes of traffic open during construction), improve southbound on and off-ramps. Remove existing northbound on-ramp and construct new ramp adjacent to the existing northbound off-ramp which requires a bridge structure over SR 41. Improve the traffic operations at the SR 41 - EI Camino Real (ECR) intersection (two lanes east and west, scramble turn lane,free northbound right turn lane at ECR). Problem: Route 41/US 101 interchange connects to heavily traveled routes. There is significant traffic congestion at the intersection of SR 41 and ECR. The lack of adequate turning lanes, close intersection spacing, and uncontrolled turning movements onto the northbound on-ramp, all contribute to the poor level of service at the interchange. During the PM peak hour the existing facility is operating at LOS F at the 41/101 south bound ramps intersection with the maximum queue observed extending beyond Route 41/Atascadero Ave. intersection, LOS D at the 41/ECR intersection, and LOS C at the 101 north bound ramps/ECR intersection. Recent traffic analysis demonstrates that existing volumes will cause a failure in operations for the structure and interchange improvements designed and programmed in 1998. The design team has modified the project to include adequate lanes and spacing to accommodate the revised volume projections, both at existing and 2025 projections. The design modifications result in a potential increase in right-of way-costs ($1.8M) and structure/roadway costs ($4.9M). Proposed Funding contribution: Table 1 on the Lewis Ave. Bridge following page outlines local funding •contributions for interchange and El Camino Real highway improvements projects over the past decade. Local funding contributions have ranged from 0% to 100% based upon a number of factors Highway 101 (i.e. state to state route, regional significance, ability of local agency to r ' contribute, and other factors). ' This project was originally funded at 100% RTIP for the following reasons. • Tie-In to SR 41 Realignment Project a • State to State Route • Interchange is deficient and _ Hi hwa4t substandard, servingdowntown 101/41 IC Imps. Atascadero. Justification for required local match: Considering previous funding contributions made from other agencies for similar projects (shown in Table 1) and the City of Atascadero's existing "ability to pay", SLOCOG staff is recommending the City provide a minimum match equivalent to the City's 2002 RTIP Local Choice funds ($423,000). Other factors, such as "regional significance", demonstrate that although the 101/41/ECR interchange is a State Route to State Route connection, it serves approximately 40 to 60% local traffic. Other local funding sources, such as developer fees, are not available. The City's redevelopment agency has recently been formed and is unable to contribute significantly to this project. Based upon the City's ability to pay and equity throughout the region, staff believes this required match is justified. • A-2-13 I. V52 ITEM NUMBER: C-4 DATE: 11/27/2001 i 9 Atascadero City Council Staff Report- Community Development Department Lot Line Adjustment #2001-0033 (City of Atascadero / Kelly Gearhart) 5599 Traffic Way & 5501 Traffic Way RECOMMENDATIONS: Council: 1. Adopt the draft Resolution "A" approving the acceptance of 2,500 +/- square feet of property proposed to be exchanged in Lot Line Adjustment 2001-0033, consistent with the Planning Commission's finding that the exchange of City property involved in LLA 2001-0033 is consistent with the City's General Plan as required by California Government Code Section • 65402. 2. Adopt the draft Resolution "B" approving Lot Line Adjustment 2001-0033, based on appropriate findings and subject to conditions of approval. SUBJECT: Adjustment of lot lines between two lots of record owned by the City Of Atascadero and a private landowner. The adjustment is an equal exchange of area(2,500 +/- square feet) between two lots to facilitate the construction of an improved access road to the Youth / Community Center site. SITUATION AND FACTS: 1. Applicant: City of Atascadero 6500 Palma Avenue Atascadero CA 93422 2. Property Owner Lot#1: Kelly Gearhart • 6205 Alcantara Avenue Atascadero CA 93422 A. Address Lot#1: 5501 Traffic Way 053 ITEM NUMBER: C-4 DATE: 11/27/2001 A. Address Lot#l: 5501 Traffic Way • B. Property Owner: Kelly Gearhart C. Legal Description: Lot 1 of Parcel Map 43-56 D. General Plan Designation: Industrial E. Zoning District: Industrial 3. Property Owner#2: City of Atascadero 6500 Palma Avenue Atascadero CA 93422 A. Address Lot#2: 5599 Traffic Way B. Property Owner: City of Atascadero C. Legal Description: Lot 2 of Parcel Map 43-56 D. General Plan Designation: Public, Industrial, Recreation E. Zoning District: Public Industrial, Recreation • 4. Site Area: 12+/- Acres 5. Environmental Status: Class 5 Exemption. CEQA Section 15305 DISCUSSION: Planning Commission Action: When public property is being sold, exchanged, or disposed of, California Government Code Section 65402 requires the Planning Commission to prepare a report that indicates the exchange of the property conforms with the General Plan. The Planning Commission reviewed the exchange of city property involved in Lot Line Adjustment 2001-0033 at the November 20, 2001 Planning Commission meeting and adopted Resolution PC 2001-0067, recommending the City Council find that the disposition of City property involved in LLA 2001-0033 is consistent with the City's General Plan as required by California Government Code Section 65402. The Commission found that the disposition of the property is in conformance with the General Plan because the lot line adjustment will facilitate the construction of an access drive to the new Youth/ Community Center site, which will in turn facilitate the development of the new Youth/ Community Center. The Youth / Community Center is a project that is consistent with the • adopted Land Use and Parks and Recreation Elements of the General Plan and has been a long- term goal for the city. 054 ITEM NUMBER: C-4 DATE: 11/27/2001 • Background: The City proposes to adjust the lot lines between two legal lots. The lot line adjustment is an equal exchange of area between two parcels, in that the proposed lot line adjustment will adjust the common side property line between the parcels, but the gross area of the parcels will remain the same. The intent of this lot line adjustment is to provide the City of Atascadero with an alternative access driveway to the Atascadero Youth/ Community Center, located at 5493 Traffic Way. The existing legal access to this property is located between two commercial properties, Central Coast Seafood and Conte Woodworking. This entrance is deemed to be undesirable as an entrance to the proposed Youth Community Center. The property owner of the parcel adjacent to Traffic Way Park, Kelly Gearhart has agreed to a lot-line adjustment to provide the City of Atascadero, which will provide a preferred alternate access- driveway location. �b Prope City is Transferring Pro erty City is Acquiring 4 w Youth /Community Center Site Proposed Location for New Access Drive Analysis: Only building and zoning standards must be met. The City's subdivision regulations set certain standards for lot line adjustments. However, the State Subdivision Map Act (Section 66412(d) of the California Government Code) takes precedence over any local California jurisdiction's subdivision regulations, and states that lot line adjustments may be reviewed for compliance with building and zoning codes only. If an application meets those codes or can be conditioned to meet them, then it must be approved. Therefore, any specific standards in the City's subdivision regulations that do not relate to building or zoning are not applicable. As noted below, the lot line adjustment as conditioned is consistent with zoning and building codes. • The lot line adjustment is consistent with the General Plan and Zoning Regulations, and with the Building Code. Lot#1 is designated Industrial on the General Plan Land Use Map, and is presently zoned Industrial. Lot #2 is a "multi-zoned" lot. The lot has a land use designation and corresponding zoning districts of Public, Industrial, and Recreation. The land use U55 ITEM NUMBER: C-4 DATE: 11/27/2001 designations do not follow lot lines. The portion of the lot that will be adjusted is within the Industrial land use and zoning district. The land use and zoning district lines follow a lot line . that was extinguished by a lot line adjustment in 1987. During the 1992 General Plan update, the old parcel line was used as the boundary for the Industrial District as shown on the following exhibit. The portion of the Industrial zoned property adjusted by the lot line adjustment will be available for future industrial uses by Mr. Gearhart. y `� ssy� ♦ c ► � `# a t e � - sf. a m +• ssf�. #mss Y J a.: +�*s e ixi : 4x �:. a ♦ � s o ea i�.S#. ., sa - s �; • � € € �rs s � a `* a �- _ " # ►,, k � r+s is #.. INDUSTRIAL Lot Owned by City—A single lot with three land use designations: Industrial, Recreation and Public Land Use lig„�.�•: Designation • Lot Owned by Mr. w Gearhart—Industrial Land ° Use Designation kvv SITES r �� # Lot line extinguished by a lotr '� :. � $ g x line adjustment in 1987(PM 43- � * * 56) The lot line adjustment will facilitate the construction of an access to the new Youth/Community Center site which is consistent the adopted Land Use and Parks and Recreation Elements of the • General Plan. No building code issues. The lots are developed with Industrial and Public uses. 056 ITEM NUMBER: C-4 DATE: 11/27/2001 • Environmental Review: The lot line adjustment is exempt from environmental review, because it is a minor change in land use limitations, occurring on property with an average slope under 20%. (CEQA Class 5 Categorical Exemption). Conclusion: The Lot Line Adjustment application is consistent with the General Plan and applicable building and zoning code requirements and the exchange of City property for the purposes of installing a preferred access drive to the new Youth / Community Center conforms with the General Plan. FISCAL IMPACT: None. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A- Location Map Attachment B - Draft Resolution of Approval "A" (Exchange of Property) Attachment C - Draft Resolution of Approval `B"(Lot Line Adjustment) • • 057 ITEM NUMBER: C-4 DATE: 11/27/2001 Attachment A: Location Map LLA 200 • Dispositionion of of City Property Project Site I' �i ttI js f t( 058 ITEM NUMBER: C-4 DATE: 11/27/2001 • Attachment B: Draft Resolution PC 2001-0067 LLA 2001-0033 General Plan Conformity Report Disposition of City Property DRAFT RESOLUTION "A" A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO AUTHOURIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTER A CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE FOR REAL PROPERTY ASSOCIATED WITH LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 2001-0033. WHEREAS, The City of Atascadero (herein referred to as "City") is a public entity established under the laws of California, and WHEREAS, the City desires to have an improved access road to the Atascadero Youth/Community Center, parcel 028-361-003 from Traffic Way Park; and WHEREAS, the owner of adjacent parcel 029-091-035, has agreed to an even trade of property with the City of Atascadero in order to facilitate this improved access road; and • WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has found that the lot line adjustment is consistent with the City's General Plan; and, WHEREAS, Deeds conveying an interest in real property require a Certificate of Acceptance in order to be recorded. IT IS NOW RESOLVED THAT: The City Manager is authorized to sign all documents necessary and convenient to record the final documents approving Final Lot Line Adjustment 2001-0033, and to accept the real property transferred to the city thereby shown on attached Exhibit A On Motion by Council Member and seconded by Council Member the foregoing Resolution was adopted on the following roll-call vote: AYES: NOES: • ABSENT: ADOPTED: ITEM NUMBER: C-4 DATE: 11/27/2001 CITY OF ATASCADERO • Mike Arrambide Mayor ATTEST: Marcia McClure Torgerson City Clerk Approved as to form: Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney • 60 ITEM NUMBER: C-4 DATE: 11/27/2001 Exhibit A • Tentative Lot Line Adjustment Map Lot Line Adjustment 2001-0033 5501 Traffic Way and 5599 Traffic Way f � . 'RC • r / Jr Detail r � 1 AN t �' r t``^�L (. 1� •u y�i ,. � r r �F r L, , d( L.;��t `r 1 t �p :tq.l t ".1-T,d i Ji\.��• r' )t(f, _� }I .�©\i t/�= t .:• )t .' 1 L F11 ; Existing Lot Configuration Proposed Lot Configuration • 061 ITEM NUMBER: C-4 DATE: 11/27/2001 Attachment C Draft Resolution Lot Line Adjustment 2001-0033 • 5501 Traffic Way and 5599 Traffic Way DRAFT RESOLUTION "B" A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVING LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 2001-0033 THEREBY ALLOWING AN EQUAL EXCHANGE OF AREA BETWEEN TWO LOTS (5599 Traffic Way / 5501 Traffic Way / City of Atascadero / Gearhart) WHEREAS, an application has been received from the City of Atascadero (6500 Palma Avenue, Atascadero, CA 93423) applicant / property owner and Kelly Gearhart (6205 Alcantara Avenue, Atascadero, CA 93422) property owner, to consider a project consisting of an equal exchange of property between two lots; and, WHEREAS, the portions of the lot affected by the lot line adjustment have a General Plan Designation of Industrial (I); and, WHEREAS, the portions of the lot affected by the lot line adjustment have a current zoning district of Industrial (I); and, • WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has found that the lot line adjustment is consistent with the City's General Plan; and, WHEREAS, the laws and regulations relating to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) have been adhered to; and, WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 65402 requires the Planning Commission to prepare a report that indicates the exchange of the property conforms with the City's General Plan; and WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed staff report upon the subject of the General Plan Conformity Report relating to the proposed Lot Line Adjustment was held by the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero at which meeting the Planning Commission found that the exchange of City property involved in LLA 2001-0033 is consistent with the City's General Plan; and, WHEREAS, the Atascadero City Council, at a duly noticed public hearing held on November 27, 2001 studied and considered the Planning Commission General Plan Conformity recommendation on Lot Line Adjustment 2001-0033. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council takes the following actions: SECTION 1. Class 5 Categorical Exemption. The Planning Commission finds that the proposed project is consistent with the Class 1 Categorical Exemption per section 15305 of the 062 ITEM NUMBER: C-4 DATE: 11/27/2001 CEQA Guidelines, pertaining to the minor change in land use limitations, occurring on property • with an average slope under 20%. SECTION 2. Findings of Approval for Lot Line Adjustment, the Council of the City of Atascadero finds as follows: a) The lot line adjustment conforms with all applicable building, zoning, and subdivision regulations of the City of Atascadero and is consistent with the City's General Plan. SECTION 3. Approval. The Atascadero City Council, in a regular session assembled on November 27, 2001 resolved to approve Lot Line Adjustment 2001-0033 subject to the following: a) Exhibit A: Lot Line Adjustment 2001-0033 b) Exhibit B: Conditions of Approval On motion by Council Member and seconded by Council Member the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted following roll call vote: AYES: • NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ADOPTED: By: Mike Arrambide, Mayor Attest: 063 ITEM NUMBER: C-4 DATE: 11/27/2001 • Exhibit A Tentative Lot Line Adjustment Map Lot Line Adjustment 2001-0033 5501 Traffic Way and 5599 Traffic Way f l�L r Detail JL IWO' .. r , 4 1 t "rr" _1 a 1. t j �� r j r i� {• l l 1 l tr \ 1 • { i t• p i t i t i i t Vii all • Existing Lot Configuration Proposed Lot Configuration 065 ITEM NUMBER: C-4 DATE: 11/27/2001 Exhibit B • Findings and Conditions of Approval Lot Line Adjustment 2001-0033 5501 Traffic Way and 5599 Traffic Way CONDITIONS: 1. The lot line adjustment as generally shown on the map attachment provided herein shall be submitted reflected in a record of survey and Certificates of Compliance (1), or deeds to be approved by the Community Development Department and City Engineer prior to recordation. The deeds shall be submitted in the City's Certificate of Compliance standard format. 2. Approval of this lot line adjustment shall expire two years from the date of approval unless a time extension has been granted in response to a written request received prior to the expiration date. 3. The applicant shall show the ATAL number issued by the County of San Luis Obispo (on the record of survey map or included in "Exhibit B" of the Certificates of Compliance); plat all plottable easements with recording information, list all unplottable easements, and show the legal description for the properties being adjusted. 4. If a record of survey is submitted, a mylar copy of the survey shall be submitted to the • Community Development Department for approval prior to recordation. e 06b 1 ITEM NUMBER: C-5 DATE: 11/27/2001 FW W I mini 57-9 Atascadero City Council City Manager's Office Information Bulletin A. El Camino Homeless Organization (ECHO) ECHO received a $20,000 Community Development Block Grant in the 2001 cycle to provide emergency shelter motel vouchers and to assist in the establishment of an office. ECHO has modified the scope of the project substantially and now propose to use the funds for the following: Revised 2001 CDBG Budget 20 Cots $100 each $2,000 25 Twin Sheet Sets $22 per set 500 25 Pillows—Washable $16 each 400 50 Vellux Washable Blankets $32 each 1,600 42 Emergency Vouchers—to be shared with Police $60 per night $2,550 Department, Women's Shelter and HHP 1 pair Heavy Duty Washer/Dryer $700 each 1,400 1 Surplus Van to transport guests from screening center 6,000 to host church 25 18 gallon storage bins $6 each 150 800 Shower Vouchers—or—Portable Shower& Setup $5 $4,000 when permanent lease is obtained 1 Phone Installation $350 350 4 4' X 8' Portable Room Dividers for noise management $250 1000 and privacy TOTAL $20,000 Because CDBG funds are competitive and awarded on the basis of a proposed project, staff is requesting Council review the modified project prior to execution of a contract. This item will appear for action on your next agenda. 067