HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 10/23/2001 AGENDA
iais � is e
ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 23, 2001
7:00 P.M.
City of Atascadero
6500 Palma Avenue, 4th Floor
Atascadero, California
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: 6:30 P.M.
CLOSED SESSION:
. 1) Conference with legal counsel -Pending litigation(Govt. Code Sec. 54956.9)
Name of Case: Kimberly&Adam Miramon v. Home Depot USA
(The federal court case number is not available.)
2) Conference with legal counsel - Existing litigation(Govt. Code Seca 54956.9(a))
Name of Case: Diamond v City of Atascadero
REGULAR SESSION, 7:00 P.M.:
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Pro Tem Scalise
ROLL CALL: Mayor Arrambide
Mayor Pro Tem Scalise
Council Member Clay
Council Member Johnson
Council Member Luna
APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Roll Call
PRESENTATIONS:
1. Proclamation declaring November 4-10, 2001, "Animal Shelter Appreciation Week."
COMMUNITY FORUM:
(This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wanting to address the Council on any
matter not on this agenda and over which the Council has jurisdiction. Speakers are limited to
five minutes. Please state your name and address for the record before making your
presentation. The Council may take action to direct the staff to place a matter of business on a
future agenda.)
COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS:
(On their own initiative, Council Members may make a brief announcement or a brief report on
their own activities. Council Members may ask a question for clarification, make a referral to
staff or take action to have staff place a matter of business on a future agenda. The Council may
take action on items listed on the Agenda.)
A. CONSENT CALENDAR: Roll Call
(All items on the consent calendar are considered to be routine and non-controversial by
City staff and will be approved by one motion if no member of the Council or public
wishes to comment or ask questions. If comment or discussion is desired by anyone, the
item will be removed from the consent calendar and will be considered in the listed
sequence with an opportunity for any member of the public to address the Council •
concerning the item before action is taken)
1. City Council Minutes—September 25, 2001
■ City Clerk recommendation: Council approve the City Council minutes of September
25, 2001. [City Clerk]
2. City Council Minutes—October 9, 2001
■ City Clerk recommendation: Council approve the City Council minutes of October 9,
2001. [City Clerk]
3. September 2001 -Accounts Payable and Payroll
■ Fiscal Impact: $921,883.84
■ Staff recommendation: Council approve certified City accounts payable, payroll and
payroll vendor checks for September 2001. [Administrative Services]
4. Trench Cut Ordinance
■ Fiscal Impact: Trench Repair Program - There will be some administration costs in
setting up the program. Once the program is set up the parties requesting the Trench
Cut would pay for all costs.
■ Staff recommendations: Council introduce for second reading by title only, and
adopt the draft Ordinance amending Title 7, Public Works, Chapter 15,
Encroachments on Public Property, of the Atascadero Municipal Code by adding •
Article 15, Trench Cuts. [Public Works]
2
5. Traffic Signal Interconnect Design/Traffic Signal Sygchronization Project
■ Fiscal Impact: $36,405.00
■ Staff recommendation: Council authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement
• with Omni Means, Ltd. to design the Traffic Signal Interconnect and Traffic Signal
Synchronization with a maximum design expenditure of$36,405.00. [Public Works]
6. 2001 Local Law Enforcement Block Grants Program
■ Fiscal Impact: None
■ Staff recommendation: Council authorize 2001 Local Law Enforcement Block Grant
funds be allocated for the purchase of specialized police equipment. [Police]
B. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. Zone Change 2001-0016, Conditional Use Permit 2001-0046, Tentative Parcel Map
2001-0019 (AT 01-195) - 5725 Portola Road(Messer/Vaughan Surveys)
■ Fiscal Impact: The project would likely have a slight negative impact on City
revenues. As a general rule, single-family dwellings require services that exceed the
revenue generated by the dwelling.
■ Staff recommendation:
1. Council reject, without prejudice, a 25 foot easement for public road purposes.
■ Planning Commission recommendations: Council:
2. Adopt the Draft Resolution certifying proposed Negative Declaration 2001-0028;
and,
3. Introduce for first reading by title only, the draft Ordinance approving Zone
Change 2001-0016 amending the City's Municipal Code to create a new Planned
Development 16 Overlay District; and,
4. Introduce for first reading by title only, the draft Ordinance approving Zone
Change 2001-0016 amending the City's Official Zoning Map to add a PD 16
overlay district to APN 054-022-033; and,
S. Adopt the Draft Resolution approving the Master Plan of Development for the
proposed PD-16 (CUP 2001-0046) subject to findings and conditions of
approval; and,
6. Adopt the Draft Resolution approving Tentative Parcel Map 2001-0019 subject to
findings and conditions of approval. [Community Development]
C. MANAGEMENT REPORTS:
1. Storm Drain Construction and Easement Acceptance -APN#028-361-002 (Garrison)
■ Fiscal Impact: $14,206.00
■ Staff recommendation: Council:
1. Approve payment of $14,206.00 to Wilson Excavating and Grading for the
removal and relocation of a storm drain; and
2. Accept the "Offer to Dedicate"a storm drain easement over the new storm drain.
[Public Works]
3
2. Draft Atascadero Lake Park Master Plan
■ Fiscal Impact: Adoption of this draft will have no immediate fiscal impact. The
estimated construction costs to complete the entire planis 2.8 million dollars. The
estimated annual maintenance and operational costs if the entire plan is constructed
is$52,000.00 per year.
■ Staff recommendation: Council approve the draft Resolution adopting the
Atascadero Lake Park Master Plan. [Community Services]
D. COMMITTEE REPORTS:
(The following represent standing committees. Informative status reports will be given,
as felt necessary):
Mayor Arrambide
1 S.L.O.-Council of Governments(SLOCOG)/S.L.O. Regional Transit Authority(SLORTA)
2. Water Committees
3. County Mayor's Round Table
Ma oY r Pro Tem Scalise
1. Finance Committee
2. City/ Schools Committee
3. Economic Opportunity Commission(EOC)
4. Atascadero State Hospital Advisory Board
5. Economic Vitality Corporation, Board of Directors (EVC)
Council Member Luna •
1. Finance Committee
2. Integrated Waste Management Authority(IWMA)
3. North County Homeless Coalition
Council Member Johnson
1. Local Agency Formation Commissions (LAFCO)
Council Member Clay
I. Air Pollution Control District(APCD)
2. City/ Schools Committee
E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION:
I. City Council
2. City Attorney
3. City Clerk
4. City Treasurer
•
4
F. ADJOURNMENT:
• Please note: Should anyone challenge any proposed development entitlement listed on this
Agenda in court, that person may be limited to raising those issues addressed at the public
hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at or
prior to this public hearing.
I, Marcia McClure Torgerson, the City Clerk of the City of Atascadero, declare under the
penalty of perjury that the foregoing agenda for the October 23, 2001 Regular Session of the
Atascadero City Council was posted on October 16, 2001 at Atascadero City Hall, 6500
Palma Ave., Atascadero, CA 93422 and was available for public review in the City Clerk's
office at that location.
Signed this 16'h day of October, 2001 at Atascadero, California.
Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Cle
City of Atascadero
•
5
City of Atascadero
WELCOME TO THE ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
The City Council meets in regular session on the second and fourth Tuesday of each month at 7:00 p.m., •
in the Council Chamber of City Hall. Matters are considered by the Council in the order of the printed
Agenda.
Copies of the staff reports or other documentation relating to each item of business referred to on the
Agenda are on file in the office of the City Clerk(Room 311) available for public inspection during City
Hall business hours. An agenda packet is also available for public review at the Atascadero Library,
6850 Morro Road. Contracts, Resolutions and Ordinances will be allocated a number once they are
approved by the City Council. The minutes of this meeting will reflect these numbers.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in
a City meeting or other services offered by this City, please contact the City Manager's Office, (805)
461-5010, or the City Clerk's Office, (805)461-5074. Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting
or time when services are needed will assist the City staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can
be made to provide accessibility to the meeting or service.
TO SPEAK ON AGENDA ITEMS
Members of the audience may speak on any item on the agenda. The Mayor will identify the subject,
staff will give their report, and the Council will ask questions of staff. The Mayor will announce when
the public comment period is open and will request anyone interested to address the Council regarding
the matter being considered to step up to the podium. If you wish to speak for, against or comment in
any way:
• You must approach the podium and be recognized by the Mayor •
• Give your name and address(not required)
• Make your statement
• All comments should be made to the Mayor and Council
• All comments limited to 5 minutes(unless changed by the Council)
• No one may speak for a second time until everyone wishing to speak has had an opportunity
to do so,and no one may speak more than twice on any item.
The Mayor will announce when the public comment period is closed, and thereafter, no further public
comments will be heard by the Council.
TO SPEAK ON SUBJECTS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA
Under Agenda item, "COMMUNITY FORUM", the Mayor will call for anyone from the audience
having business with the Council to:
• Please approach the podium and be recognized
• Give your name and address
• State the nature of your business
This is the time items not on the Agenda may be brought to the Council's attention. A maximum of 30
minutes will be allowed for Community Forum(unless changed by the Council).
TO HAVE ITEMS PLACED ON AGENDA
All business matters to appear on the Agenda must be in the Office of the City Manager ten days
preceding the Council meeting. Should you have a matter you wish to bring before the Council, please
mail or bring a written communication to the City Manager's office in City Hall prior to the deadline.
"ANIMAL SHELTER APPRECIATION WEEK"
• November 4-10, 2001
WHEREAS, there are more than 73 million cats and 68 million dogs living in more than
63 million households across the United States; and
WHEREAS, the irresponsibility of some pet owners has resulted in animals running
loose and unsupervised, causing a threat to public health and safety; and
WHEREAS, indiscriminate breeding allowed by irresponsible pet owners who have not
had their companion animals spayed or neutered has contributed to pet overpopulation; and
WHEREAS, animal shelter employees, like police officers and emergency medical
personnel, must respond to these community problems and crises; and
WHEREAS, animal shelters act as safe havens for homeless and abused animals,
• providing them with comfort and care; and
WHEREAS, animal shelters help both animals and people in many ways: by returning
lost pets to their owners, enforcing animal control laws, rescuing injured animals, educating the
public, and matching up families with new animal companions and;
WHEREAS, the work of animal shelters and the important services they provide often go
unnoticed and under appreciated by the citizens;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Atascadero City Council, that
November 4-10, 2001 is designated "Animal Shelter Appreciation Week"in recognition of North
County Humane Society for providing lifesaving services to animals and people in our
community.
J. Michael Arrambide, Mayor
• City of Atascadero, CA
October 23, 2001
001
ITEM NUMBER: A- 1
DATE: 10/23/2001
nA ®i. DRAFT MINUTES
dais n 1979
ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 25, 2001
7:00 P.M.
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: 6:30 P.M.
PUBLIC COMMENT - CLOSED SESSION
None
CLOSED SESSION:
I
1) Conference with labor negotiator(Govt. Code Sec. 54957.6)
Agency Negotiator: Mayor Mike Arrambide
Position: City Manager
CLOSED SESSION REPORT
Mayor Arrambide announced that the City Council has met, reviewed and approved a contract
for City Manager Wade McKinney. Council has agreed that his compensation is per the City's
wage scale at Range 60 Step E. Information on this item is available in the agenda packet for
tonight's meeting.
REGULAR SESSION, 7:00 P.M.:
Mayor Arrambide called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. and Council Member Luna led the
Pledge of Allegiance.
CC 09/25/01 . 002
Page 1
ROLL CALL:,
Present: Council Members Clay, Johnson, Luna, Scalise and Mayor Arrambide.
Absent: None
Others Present: City Clerk Marcia McClure Torgerson and Treasurer David Graham
Staff Present: City Manager Wade McKinney, Assistant City Manager Brady Cherry,
Community Development Director Lori Parcells, Planning Services
Manager Warren Frace, Public Works Director Steve Kahn, Police Chief
Dennis Hegwood, Fire Chief Kurt Stone, Technology Director Andrew
Fruin and City Attorney Roy Hanley.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA:
Mayor Arrambide, under the provision for the addition of an emergency agenda item, added an
item for Atascadero State Hospital Community Concerns, and placed this issue under Public
Hearings as Item#13-1.
MOTION: By Mayor Pro Tem Scalise and seconded by Council Member
Johnson to approve the Agenda with the addition of the Atascadero
State Hospital Report as Public Hearing Item # B-1. •
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote.
PRESENTATIONS:
1. Proclamation declaring October 7-13, 2001, "Fire Prevention Week."
Mayor Arrambide read the proclamation and presented it to Fire Chief Kurt Stone. Chief Stone
thanked the Council and stated that the Fire Department looks forward to this week every year.
Throughout the week they canvas all of the schools bringing the message of fire prevention to
the students; their target audience is pre-school through fourth grade. Chief Stone gave a report
on the fundraiser the Department has established for the New York City fallen emergency
personnel. To date $41,000 has been collected, and donations can be made at any branch of Mid
State Bank.
Police Chief Dennis Hegwood and Fire Chief Kurt Stone read from a prepared joint statement
for media release regarding the tragic events of September 11, 2001 and the preparedness of the
Atascadero Fire and Police Departments.
Police Officer Robert Eckrote, President of the Atascadero Police Association, recognized City
Manager Wade McKinney, for his support of the Police Department, and for his
CC 09/25/01 0 3
Page 2
accomplishments for the City of Atascadero and its employees. Mr. McKinney thanked the
Police Association for the recognition.
COMMUNITY FORUM:
Lanny Dugar, told the Council that he cannot enjoy a meal in The Outlaws Bar and Grill because
of people in the restaurant that are smoking. He stated that he has complained to County
Tobacco Control, and they stated that they have forwarded many similar complaints regarding
this restaurant to the Atascadero Police Department. To his knowledge at this time no one at the
restaurant has been sited. Mr. Dugar has been in contact with a State of California agency called
BREATH who has informed him that today they had a telecommunications conference with the
County of San Luis Obispo and they will be taking action against the City of Atascadero and the
Outlaws Bar and Grill in an attempt to move them to enforce the smoking ordinance.
Mayor Arrambide closed the Community Forum period.
COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS: None
A. CONSENT CALENDAR:
• 1. City Council Minutes— September 11, 2001
■ City Clerk recommendation: Council approve the City Council minutes of September
11, 2001. [City Clerk]
2. City Treasurer's Agenda Report - July 2001
■ City Treasurer recommendation: Council review and accept the July 2001
Treasurer's Report. [City Treasurer]
3. August 2001 - Accounts Payable and Payroll
■ Fiscal Impact: $1,835,846 77
■ Staff recommendation: Council approve certified City accounts payable, payroll and
payroll vendor checks for August 2001. [Administrative Services]
4. Purchasing Policy - Adoption of Ordinance
■ Fiscal Impact: None. The proposed policy is expected to generate a savings of staff
time.
■ Staff recommendation: Council:
1. Introduce for second reading by title only, and adopt Ordinance No. 386,
amending sections 2-3.01, 2-3.04, and 2-3.05 of the Atascadero Municipal Code
and deleting Sections 2-3.08 and 2-3.09, and Section 2-3A.01 through 2-3A.09,
inclusive of the Atascadero Municipal Code [Administrative Services]
CC 09/25/01
Page 3 004
5. Public Safety Communication Center- Dispatch Console
■
FiscalImpact.• S159,002.97(in FY 2001-02 Budget)
■ Staff recommendations: Council:
1. Designate 2001 Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund (SLESF) monies
for use in Public Safety Technology improvements; and
2. Authorize purchase of the Orbacom Radio system and work stations from Durham
Communications. [Police]
6. City Employment Agreement
■ Fiscal Impact: Contract enhancements provide an additional cost of $1,200.00
annually, the elimination of the incentive program provides a potential savings of
$5,000.00 resulting in an overall savings of$3,800.00.
■ Staff recommendation: Council approve Employment Agreement with the City
Manager and authorize the Mayor to sign. [City Manager]
7. Authorization to Execute Master Agreement, Administering Agency - State Agreement
for Funded Projects Program Supplements - Agreement No. 000421
■ Fiscal Impact: None
■ Staff recommendation: Council adopt the draft Resolution authorizing the City
Manager to execute Administering Agency - State Agreement No. 000421 Program
Supplements. [Public Works]
Mayor Pro Tem Scalise requested that Consent Calendar Item#A-2 be pulled.
MOTION: B Council Member Johnson and seconded b Council Me •
By y tuber Clay
to approve Consent Calendar Items # A-1, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. (Item #A-6 Contract No. 2001-
033,Item #A-7 Resolution No. 2001-037.)
Mayor Pro Tem Scalise stated that she pulled Consent Calendar Item #A-2 with the intent of
thanking the City Treasurer for providing the Council with the yield information that was
requested at the last reporting.
MOTION: By Mayor Pro Tem Scalise and seconded by Council Member
Johnson to approve Consent Calendar Item#A-2.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote.
B. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. Atascadero State Hospital - Community Concerns
City Manager Wade McKinney gave the staff report and answered questions of Council.
CC 09/25/01
Page 4 005
• PUBLIC COMMENT
Lanny Dugar, stated to the Council that the Atascadero Police Department handed out a flyer to
the residents surrounding the Atascadero State Hospital with an outdated photo of the escapee.
He stressed the importance of handing out accurate information to the community.
Barrie Hafler, Public Relations Officer, Atascadero State Hospital, explained that the Hospital
became aware of the absent prisoner at 4:30 p.m. on Sunday and the Atascadero Police were
present at the Hospital by 6:00 p.m.
Mayor Arrambide closed the Public Comment period.
The Council expressed their concerns and discussed the issue.
MOTION: By Council Member Clay and seconded by Council Member Johnson
to direct a letter to the State Hospital regarding City Council concerns
with facility operations, security and escape procedures, and
requesting a response back from the Hospital regarding their
corrective action.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote.
MOTION: By Council Member Luna and seconded by Council Member Johnson
to write a letter to Senator O'Connell and Assemblyman Maldonado,
. to include constructive suggestions for legislation to cure some of the
problems identified in the staff report and also to express Council's
concern regarding updating the Megan's Law data base.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote.
2. Appeal - Planning Commission Resolutions PC 2001-040, PC 2001-035 and Tentative
Tract Map 2000-0002 - 8300 Santa Rosa Road - Yellow Rose Ranch (David Graves)
[Community Development]
Alan Thomas, Appellant, gave his report to the Council expressing his concerns with this project
regarding water quality and drainage. He asked the Council to require an Environmental Impact
Report (EIR) on this project. (Attachment A)
Planning Services Manager Warren Frace gave the staff report to Council.
Russ Thompson, R. Thompson Consulting, project civil engineer, explained to the Council that
they have done extensive studies to mitigate the difficult issues on this site and asked the Council
to support the Planning Commission's decision. He offered to answer any Council questions.
Robert Eilimiller, Sierra Delta Corporation, explained the drainage plans for this project and
answered questions of Council.
•
CC 09/25/01
Page 5 006
Mayor Arrambide called a recess at 9:02 p.m. .
Mayor Arrambide called the meeting back to order at 9:13 p.m.
Mr. Frace and City Attorney Roy Hanley answered questions of Council.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Lanny Dugar, asked the Council to consider him an expert witness, as he has been a general
contractor for 30 years. He explained that he built the house next door to this project and he
found alluvial soil 15 feet deep. Mr. Dugar warned the Council against approving a subdivision
with unstable soils.
Eric Greening, 7365 Valle, stated that an EIR would tie up the loose ends of this project. He
expressed his concerns with this project and proposed a focused EIR.
Frank Kock, 9545 Lakeview Drive, thanked the Council for listening to all sides of this issue as
he felt the Planning Commission had not given suitable attention to the differing opinions on this
project. He addressed his comments to the erosion issue and drainage on the property.
John Nowak, 8605 San Gabriel Road, expressed, in a prepared statement read by Bruce Bonifas,
his opposition to the approval of this project without an EIR. (Attachment B)
Henry Engen, 9575 Lakeview Drive, stated his opposition of approving this project without an •
EIR. (Attachment C)
Steven Good, 8830 San Gabriel Road, urged the Council to protect Atascadero Lake by reducing
the development of this site to a maximum of two homes.
Cindy Mewthur, 8895 San Gabriel Road, has lived near this project since 1977. She gave a brief
history of rain events and their results as she has witnessed them and expressed her concerns
with the proposed drainage mitigation measures.
Russ James, 9470 Marchant Way, stated to the Council that he lives in the same drainage area
and he has had drainage problems for many years. He encouraged the Council to require a
focused EIR prior to the beginning of development on the property and to ensure that the builder
follows the plans as originally presented and approved.
Ron Bell, 8800 San Gabriel Road, explained to the Council that the blue line creek that passes
through this property is the main waterway to Atascadero Lake. He stated by approving this
project without an EIR the City could be creating many serious problems for Atascadero Lake
Frank Kock, gave the Council handouts showing the proposed parcels and adjacent parcels and
their acreage. He stated his handout shows the proposed parcels are significantly smaller than
the surrounding parcels. Mr. Kock also suggested that the creek be allowed to follow its natural
route to the lake to avoid additional flooding issues. •
CC 09/25/01
Page 6 007
• Alan Thomas, 9520 Marchant Way, asked the Council to protect the Atascadero Lake and
expressed his conviction that an EIR would provide needed alternatives to reducing potential
impacts.
Frank Kock, referred to a property adjacent to this project and the homeowner's request over a
year ago to enlarge their house. He directed Council's attention to the staff report for that
request and to staff's statement at that time that "The 100 year inundation limit shall be
preserved as a flood plain protection easement and that no above ground structures or additional
driveways shall be constructed within this easement area."
Russ Thompson, answered some of the questions asked by the public.
Mayor Arrambide closed the Public Comment period.
Council asked additional questions of staff and discussed the issue thoroughly.
Council Member Johnson stated that he shares the concern expressed that the lake not be
impacted by any action taken on this project. After listening to the facts and asking many
questions, he feels that the City has done a thorough study of the major issues brought forward
by Mr. Thomas and that those issues have been mitigated. He encouraged staff to ensure that all
stated mitigation measures are carried through.
• Council Member Luna indicated that he feels this is an important watershed area for Atascadero
Lake and he does not believe that a sufficient cumulative impact analysis on this project has been
done. He stated he can vote to support the appeal and that the project needs an Environmental
Impact Report.
Council Member Scalise felt that a decision on this must be based on the facts and not
speculation. She feels that the issues raised by the appeal have all been mitigated by expert
opinion and documentation, and she will vote to deny the appeal.
MOTION: By Council Member Johnson and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem
Scalise to deny the appeal of Planning Commission Resolutions PC
2001-040, PC 2001-035 and Tentative Tract Map 2000-0002 at 8300
Santa Rosa Road —Yellow Rose Ranch, and adding to the Conditions
of Approval of the subdivision, a Condition, No. 69, requiring the
project applicant to indemnify the City for the cost of any actions
brought to set aside a Council decision to approve the project.
Motion passed 4:1 by a roll-call vote. (Luna opposed)
3. Appeal - Conditional Use Permit 2000-0019 (Condition #4) - Sprint PCS
Telecommunication Facility - Chalk Mountain - (Sprint PCS / 9230 Vista Bonita)
• [Community Development]
CC 09/25/01
Page 7 008
Gordon Bell, Bell & Associates, representative for Sprint, explained the reason he is appealing •
the Planning Commission's condition concerning the color of the cabinets; the painting of the
cabinet will void the warranty. He listed in detail the steps that will be taken to ensure the
protection of the view shed on Chalk Mountain. Mr. Bell answered questions of Council.
PUBLIC COMMENT -None
MOTION: By Council Member Johnson and seconded by Council Member Luna
to uphold the appeal of Conditional Use Permit 2000-0019 (Condition
#4).
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote.
There was Council direction to staff to expedite the permit so the landscaping can be done in a
timely manner.
C. MANAGEMENT REPORTS:
1. Atascadero Road Program
■ Fiscal Impact:
Trench Repair Program - There will be some administration costs in setting up the
program. Once the program is set up the parties requesting the Trench Cut would pay for •
all costs.
Assessment Districts - There would be costs to the City. This would depend on how many
Assessment Districts were requested and how many were approved.
■ Staff recommendations: Council:
1) Receive the update on the Atascadero Public Works Department Actions; and
2) Introduce for first reading by title only, the draft Ordinance amending Chapter
15, of the Atascadero Municipal Code, relating to trench cuts; and
3) Approve the Assessment District Program. [Public Works]
City Manager McKinney asked that Item #C-1 will be continued to a future meeting due to the
lateness of the hour.
There was Council consensus to continue Item #C-1 to the next Council meeting.
•
CC 09/25/01
Page 8 009
• 2. 2002 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Project Funding
■ Fiscal Impact: $270,000.00
■ Staff recommendation: Council accept the projects nominated for 2002 STIP
funding, and authorize the Administrative Services Director to appropriate funds for
the nominated 2002 STIP projects if they are approved by San Luis Obispo Council of
Governments for funding. [Public Works]
Public Works Director Steve Kahn provided a report on Item #C-2 and answered questions of
Council.
PUBLIC COMMENT -None
MOTION: By Council Member Johnson and seconded by Council Member Luna
to accept the projects nominated for 2002 STIP funding, and
authorize the Administrative Services Director to appropriate funds
for the nominated 2002 STIP projects if they are approved by San
Luis Obispo Council of Governments for funding.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote.
D. COMMITTEE REPORTS: None
• E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION:
City Council
Council Member Luna stated that it was excellent that staff permitted the public to utilize the
Power Point presentations.
Council Member Johnson also commended staff for a good job with the presentations.
City Clerk
Reported the receipt of four applications for the vacant position on the Planning Commission.
The interviews are tentatively planned for the next meeting on October 9"', however it might be
preferable to move it to the October 23`d meeting, as the Road Program will be on the agenda of
the 9th. There was Council consensus to conduct the interviews on October 9th
City Treasurer
Reported that two-year Treasuries are currently under 2.5, however he feels that the City's
portfolio will hold up well.
•
CC 09/25/01
Page 9 010
F. ADJOURNMENT: •
Mayor Arrambide adjourned the meeting at 11:06 p.m. to the next regularly scheduled meeting
on October 9, 2001.
MEETING RECORDED AND MINUTES PREPARED BY:
Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk
Attachment A—Alan Thomas, 9520 Marchant Way
Attachment B—John Nowak, 8605 San Gabriel Road
Attachment C—Henry Engen, 9575 Lake View Drive
•
CC 09/25/01
Page 10 O.i l
Attachment : A
Atascadero City Council Mtg .
9-25-01
•
3 .
II
STATEMENT BY: Alan Thomas 9520 Marchatnt Way
Members of the City Council and city staff. Thank you for hearing this appeal.
This is an aerial photo the Yellow Rose Ranch,which is the large green pasture
area covered with grass just south of Atascadero Lake. This picture gives us a
good perspective.
Because it's the unique location of this property that brings us here tonight
amd has so many people concerned.
And let me say before we get into the details, we would like to see a win-win
outcome with this project.
We are not challenging the rights of the developer to complete a project on this
property. He will come out a winner at the end of the day.
What we are asking is that you,as the public's representatives,take additional
steps to safeguard Atascadero Lake so the public also comes out a winner.
And I'll go through what we're asking you to do in a couple of minutes.
SLIDE
•
012 i'
•
Here's a closer look at the ranch and you can see that about 90%of
the property is covered with grass. Until recently,this was
irrigated year round to maintain a small number of cattle.
And here's the key point--a large portion of the property is a
creekway that functions as the primary watershed for Atascadero
Lake.
SLIDE
013
a,
uk'
• Literally millions of gallons of water flow through the creekway each year
during the rainy season in a wide sheeting action. That's why about 2/3 rds
of the property is considered a floodplain.
And i should point out that this creek is a registered blue line creek on USGS
maps.
But it isn't an ordinary creek, like you tend to think of a ditch
SLIDE
•
014 3
•
As you can see here,the creekwater spreads all across the property,not just •
along the edge of the property as it states in the project description. When it's
been raining for a few days,that whole swale is flooded.
The creekway also acts a final water collection point from a massive watershed
area that goes back hundreds of acres up to Eagle ranch.
According to a horticulturist we talked to,the grass provides important water
filtration and erosion control. That's why a distinct ditch has never formed on
the property. The grass is keeping everything in place.
As you know,the proposed project will completely remove this grass,bring in
7,000 cubic yards of new dirt fill for homesites and a new road, and install a
new water channel along the edges of the property.
Now we're not saying Mr. Graves doesn't have good intentions to do a good
job with all this. But the potential for a negative impact on Atascadero Lake
from this development is clear depending on what exactly is done,and how
and when it's done.
SLIDE
•
015
•
Recommended Action
Suspend proiect approval pendinLr
• Completion of a Full EIR
• Detailed plans for moving and restoring the
creek approved by impartial experts
• Detailed plans for sedimentation control and
creek irrigation approved by impartial experts
• Detailed construction sequence and timing
(creek restoration completed first)
• Enforceable creek maintenance agreement with
future homeowners
• So to make sure everyone knows exactly what's going to happen upfront,
rather than debate it endlessly as the project proceeds,we are recommending
that you take the following action: SLIDE
Suspend the project approval pending the completion of several items: SLIDE
• The completion of a Full EIR SLIDE,
•Detailed plans or specifications for moving and restoring the creek approved
by impartial experts SLIDE
•Detailed plans or specifications for sedimentation control and creek irrigation
approved by impartial experts SLIDE
•A detailed construction sequence and timing(creek restoration completed
first) SLIDE
•Enforceable creek maintenance agreement with future homeowners
The plans we saw tonight are a good start. But we think these specific
requests are reasonable given the sensitive location and complexity of this
project.
SLIDE
•
0,16
•
Why an EIR?
The Mititzated Neg Dec lacks key information:
• No specifications for necessary creek vegetation
and sedimentation control
• No specifications for homesite erosion control
• No alternatives that would reduce impacts
• No scientific analysis of water content
• No construction sequence specified
• No requirements for creek maintenance
Why an EIR? SLIDE
The Mitigated Neg Dec lacks key information.
For example, let me give you a comparison. When it comes to air quality,to
Neg Dec specifies more than a dozen procedures to follow in regard hauling
dirt,excavation,grading,etc.. And that's good.
But when it comes to moving and restoring the blue line creek SLIDE
There Are:
• No specifications for creek vegetation and sedimentation control SLIDE
• No specifications for erosion control on the new building pads SLIDE
• No alternatives for reducing environmental impact SLIDE
• No scientific analysis of water content SLIDE
• No construction and timing sequence specified SLIDE
• No requirements are given for long term creek maintenance,other than that
the future homeowners will take care of it
While the Neg Dec requests many of these thing, requests for mitigation are
not mitigation! We need to see the plans, or specifications for the plans.
Asking that they be developed by a certified landscape architect is not enough.
SLIDE
•
017
• I
Atascadero General Plan
"... proposals which are identified as having the
potential for significant adverse effects on the
environment shall be required to have
environmental impact reports prepared prior
to their consideration."
(Section S.0 Environmental Review)
Atascadero General Plan
"...proposals which are identified as having the potential for significant
adverse effects on the environment shall be required to have environmental
impact reports prepared prior to their consideration."
SLIDE
(Section S.0 Environmental Review)
018 n
s
California Environmental Quality Act
"Whenever the Environmental Coordinator determines
that there is substantial evidence that any.aspect of a
project, either individually or cumulatively, may cause
a significant effect on the environment,regardless of
whether the overall effect of the project is adverse or
beneficial, the Environmental Coordinator shall notify
the project applicant and request that the applicant
agree to an EIR pursuant to these guidelines."
(Section 8.0 CEQA guidelines adopted by City ofAtascadero in 1998)
California Environmental Quality Act •
"Whenever the Environmental Coordinator determines that there is substantial
evidence that any aspect of a project,either individually or cumulatively,may
cause a significant effect on the environment,regardless of whether the overall
effect of the project is adverse or beneficial,the Environmental Coordinator
shall notify the project applicant and request that the applicant agree to an EIR
pursuant to these guidelines."
SLIDE
(Section 8.0 CEQA guidelines adopted by City ofAtascadero in 1998)
019 G
0
•
• To summarize, we respectully request that the project approval for the tentative
tract map at 8300 Santa Rosa Road be suspended pending completion of a Full
EIR and the plans,or specifications I mentioned before.
In the long run, we believe this will help the developer by letting him know
ahead of time exactly what he will be required to do AND it will also let the
public be confident that the lake is being protected throughout the development
process. That's a win-win solution. That's all we want.
•
020
Attachment : B
Atascadero City Council Mtg .
9-25-01
Public Comment, Atascadero City Council 25 September 2001
• i
Good evening. My name is John Nowak of 8605 San Gabriel Rd., Atascadero. _
1 cannot be here tonight because of a previous commitment, but I request that my
statement be part of the public record of this meeting.
I am a 1984 graduate of Cal Poly with a degree in horticulture and I've owned
my own landscape construction and maintenance business in San Luis Obispo
County since 1986. Since 1990, i have used an Environmental Impact Report to
maintain and revegetate portions of Sweet Springs Nature Preserve, a wetland near
the bay in Los Osos, in conjunction with the Audubon Society.
I am opposed to the Planning Commission's recent decision for a Negative
Declaration that the proposed project of Mr. Graves near Atascadero Lake does not
need an Environmental Impact Report. I believe that an EIR should be required to
ensure the Implementation of a proper planting plan. A portion of the property is a
seasonal wetland as defined by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the remaining
acreage is sometimes flooded by overflow from the lake. Over the last four years that I
have lived in Atascadero I have observed that this property floods several times each
winter. •
1 believe that an EIR for Mr. Graves' project would assure nearby residents and
future property owners in the vicinity that potential silting from drainage swale run-off
will be carefully controlled to protect the wetland and the lake's sensitive habitat.,An
EIR will also provide a revegetation plan that includes a specific list of California
native plants with an appropriate irrigation plan. Even though a detailed landscape
plan is a condition of approval, I'm still concerned that the proper native plants and
perennial grasses will not be used if Mr. Graves is allowed to proceed without an EIR.
Perhaps a focused EIR could be an alternative that could be utilized to address certain
aspects of this project in a more detailed manner. Furthermore the implementation of
an EIR would also help protect the developer and the city from any future litigation
involving the drainage swale.
Thank you for your attention.
(Copies of this statement are available to Council members.
•
021
i
Attachment : C
Atascadero City Council Mtg .
9-25-01
• 9-25-01
Proposed Yellow Rose Ranch Subdivision
My na & -is Henry Engen and I live at 9575 Lake View
Drive. Im ISM:- we:-purchased our,,---,,home partially based
on the fact that there was an open space easement on
this scenic headwater to Atascadero Lake. The original
owners, Art & Betty Blankenship, told me that this. land
floods and shouldn't be subdivided., Ther City Council
agreed and an easement was recorded. Subsequently
the new owner, David Graves, found a loophole in the
open space easement condition and has applied to
subdivide the property from the current 2 lots into 6
• parcels.
Gln order to: subdivide nand under California— taw, a
number of4-findings must be made with theVor&-finding
being that the proposed subdivision must be in
conformance with the General Plan. This proposal does
;not meet this standard. -To cope with the flooding issue
the applicant would run an engineered ditch down the
,east and north side of the property-. He then proposes to
make two lots "file by excessive grading and create,3
more lots by putting in artificial pads that would be
.above4he flood plain.
Allow me to paraphrase the General Plan policies that
would be violated if this project is approved as drawn:
022
Basic Community Goals
" Atascadero should retain its overall character and
rural atmosphere with the long-term protection of the
environment as a . primary guiding criteria for public
policy decisions."
"Protect and preserve the rural atmosphere by assuring
"elbow room" for residents by means of maintenance of
large lot sizes which increase in proportion to distance
beyond the urban core."
"Preserve the contours of the hills. BuRdings built on
hi !sides shall conform to the topograph using the
slope of the land as the basis for the design of the
structure."
Single-Family Residential: Low Density
" Determination of appropriate lot sizes-shall be based
upon evaluation of such factors.as_.slope, existence-ofa
natural building _site.......Low density residential areas
are appropriate for areas within the Urban Service Line
where topography is relatively steep and where scenic
or sensitive characteristics of the land should be
protected through lighter density urban residential
designation."
Open Space Policies
"Scenic and sensitive lands including creeks, riparian
corridors, wetlands and other areas of significant
habitat value shall be protected from destruction,
2 023
• overuse, and misuse by the use of zoning, tax
incentives, easements, or fee acquisitions."
"Public,and private development:in close proximity-to or
over. such Lands shall be carefully evaluated to protect
scenic and sensitive Lands, including creek
reservations, wooded areas, flood plains, prominent
view sheds and historic sites."
"Scenic and open space easements, parklands and
open space dedications shall be obtained through the
subdivision and development review process, including
but not limited to: flood plains, creek reservations,
wooded areas, scenic backdrops, sensitive areas,
historic sites and similar suitable areas."
"The city shall carefully evaluate both public and private
projects to encourage preservation of trees,
watersheds, natural slopes and other amenities from
abuse and destruction."
"Lot splits shall be thoroughly evaluated andb_n
accordance with community plans and principles in
order to retain the desired natural character of the
community."
"Watershed,areas of Atascadero.shall-be:.protected.
"The waterways in the city shall, be maintained in a
natural state and concrete channelization of creeks
shall be prohibited. Any alterations required for public
safety will be guided by this policy."
024
Implementation: Environmental Review
" The long term protection: of the environment has been
incorporated as a, central goal in the Atascadero, General
Plan andis not thought to be in conflict with the
objective of allowing reasonable use of land.. Towards
this-. end, major projects or generaV plan amendment
proposals which are identified as having the potential
for ,significant adverse effects on the environment shall
}be required to have environmental im-pact reports
prepared prior to their consideration. Further, the
policies of the conservation and open space elements in
particular shall be adhered to in reviewing both public
and private development proposals."
Staff has inappropriately concluded that a -Mitigated
Negative-..Declaration would suffice to comply with the
California Environmental Quality Act. We have gathered
.29.8,signatures from.:people whowalkthe lake-:calling for
preparation of a full:EIR-on this project-
An Environmental „Impact Report is essential to obtain
the expertise of an impartial third. party professional to
,:review the issues raised this evening _and to look at
alternative designs for this subdivision. creating 5 new
Lots by grading and building, artificial pads. is. in,clear
violation of the General Plan. The General Plan requires
,that watershed areas be protected, and that waterways
bae _maintained in a natural state Ands.it:also requires an
EIR for this type of project. Hopefully,, you will agree and
permit a disinterested- 3rd party to evaluate this project
:and report back to:,the City.
4- 025
ITEM NUMBER: A-2
DATE: 10/23/2001
°" DRAFT MINUTES
Xyl v i 8
ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 09, 2001
7:00 P.M.
City of Atascadero
6500 Palma Avenue, 4th Floor
Atascadero, California
PLANNING COMMISSION INTERVIEWS: 3:00 P.M.
1. Interview candidates
2. Select, by ballot, one citizen for the Planning Commission.
Mayor Arrambide called the meeting to order at 3:00 p.m.
• ROLL CALL:
Present: Council Members Clay, Johnson, Luna, Scalise and Mayor Arrambide
Absent: None
Others Present: City Clerk Marcia McClure Torgerson
Staff Present: City Attorney Roy Hanley.
PUBLIC COMMENT: None
INTERVIEWS AND APPOINTMENTS:
1. Planning Commission
■ City Clerk recommendation: Council interview the seven candidates and select, by
ballot, one citizen to serve on the Planning Commission.
• The Council interviewed the seven candidates and appointed Tom O'Malley to fill the
vacancy that will expire in February 2005.
cc 10/09/01 026
Page 1
ADJOURNMENT:
Mayor Arrambide adjourned the Interview Session at 5:30 .m. to the Regular Session at 7:00
Y J p g
p.m. •
DINNER BREAK 5:30-6:30 P.M.:
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: 6:30 P.M.
REGULAR SESSION, 7:00 P.M.:
Mayor Arrambide called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. and led the Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL:
Present: Council Members Clay, Johnson, Luna, Scalise and Mayor Arrambide.
Absent: None
Others Present: City Clerk Marcia McClure Torgerson and City Treasurer David Graham
Staff Present: City Manager Wade McKinney, Assistant City Manager Brady Cherry,
Community Development Director Lori Parcells, Administrative Services
Director Rachelle Rickard, Planning Services Manager Warren Frace,
Public Works Director Steve Kahn, Police Chief Dennis Hegwood, Fire
Captain Fred Motlo, and City Attorney Roy Hanley.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA:
MOTION: By Council Member Luna and seconded by Council Member Clay to
approve the agenda.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote.
PRESENTATIONS:
1. Proclamation declaring October 2001, "Domestic Violence Awareness Month."
Mayor Arrambide read the proclamation and presented it to Eileen Allan, Executive Director of
the North County Women's Shelter and Resource Center.
Ms. Allan thanked the Council for the proclamation and for their support.
2. Assistant City Manager Brady Cherry introduced Allan Baker, Atascadero's new Zoo •
Director.
CC 10/09/01 027
Page 2
Mr. Baker thanked the Council and stated he is looking forward to working in Atascadero.
• 3. Mayor Arrambide announced that the Council has appointed Tom O'Malley to the
position of Planning Commissioner for Atascadero. Mayor Arrambide introduced Mr.
O'Malley and welcomed him to the Commission.
COMMUNITY FORUM:
Ann Ketcherside, stated there is a member of the Police Department that is a sex offender.
Additionally, she indicated that there have been several women who have died under mysterious
circumstances as well as a former employee of the City who is involved in disreputable
activities. Ms. Ketcherside also expressed her opposition to the school being proposed on El
Camino Real next to the Atascadero State Hospital.
Marilyn Brown, 8455 Graves Creek Road, requested the Council adopt an ordinance to prohibit
bow hunting within the City limits.
Daphne Fahsing, read from a prepared statement urging the Council to expedite action on the
bow hunting issue and requesting that Atascadero's Animal Ordinance be brought up to date.
(Attachment A)
Doug Milar, private investigator of violent crimes against children, expressed his concern with
the proposed school to be constructed next to Atascadero State Hospital.
•
Mayor Arrambide closed the Community Forum period.
COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS:
Council Member Luna asked for a timeline on the issue of bow hunting. Mr. McKinney
indicated that a hearing has been organized for Council Member Clay for November 14, from
5:00 to 7:00 at City Hall. Following that meeting a draft ordinance would be returned to the
Council for review.
Council Member Clay urged all citizens to participate in the activities this weekend for Colony
Days.
A. CONSENT CALENDAR:
1. City Council Minutes- Special Meeting - September 17, 2001
■ City Clerk recommendation: Council approve the City Council minutes of September
17, 2001. [City Clerk]
2. City Council Minutes— Special Meeting - September 24, 2001
■ City Clerk recommendation: Council approve the City Council minutes of September
24, 2001. [City Clerk]
CC 10/09/01 .x,,
Page 3
3. City Treasurer's Agenda Report - August 2001
■ City Treasurer recommendation: Council review and accept the August 2001
Treasurer's Report. [City Treasurer]
4. Acceptance of Final Parcel Map 2001-0015 /AT 01-014 (3 475 Maricopa Road - Brebes •
/Wilson Land Surveys)
■ Fiscal Impact: None
■ Staff recommendations: Council:
L Accept the Final Parcel Map 2001-0015 (AT 01-014); and
2. Reject without prejudice, the public utility easement (P.U.E.) shown on Final
Parcel Map 2001-0015. [Community Development]
5. Teen After-School Program - Agreement with San Luis Obispo County
■ Fiscal Impact: None. The County of San Luis Obispo will provide the City of
Atascadero $40,000.00 during Fiscal Year 2001-2002 to find after-school recreation
programs for teens on the campus of Atascadero Junior High School.
■ Staff recommendation: Council authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement
with the County of San Luis Obispo Department of Social Services to fund the
Recreation, Education and Community (R.E.C.) program for fiscal year 2001-2002.
[Community Services]
Council Member Clay requested that Item#A-2 be pulled.
MOTION: By Council Member Johnson and seconded by Council Member Clay
to approve Items #A-1, 3, 4 and 5.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. (Item #A-5 Contract No. 2001-
034)
Council Member Clay requested amendments to the Minutes of September 24, 2001 to clarify
his comments. City Clerk Marcia McClure Torgerson indicated that she would consult the tape
recording of the meeting and clarify Council Member Clay's comments where is indicated.
Council Member Clay also requested that his presentation materials from the September 24`"
meeting be attached to the Minutes.
MOTION: By Council Member Clay and seconded by Council Member Johnson
to approve Item#A-2 as amended.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote.
B. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. Zone Change 2001-0016, Conditional Use Permit 2001-0046, Tentative Parcel May
2001-0019 (AT 01-195) - 5725 Portola Road (Messer/Vaughan Surveys)
[THIS ITEM HAS BEEN CONTINUED TO A FUTURE COUNCIL MEETING]
CC 10/09/01 029
Page 4
C. MANAGEMENT REPORTS:
1. Atascadero Road Program III
• ■ Fiscal Impact:
Trench Repair Program - There will be some administration costs in setting up the
program. Once the program is set up the parties requesting the Trench Cut would pay for
all costs.
Assessment Districts - There would be costs to the City. This would depend on how many
Assessment Districts were requested and how many were approved.
■ Staff recommendations: Council:
1) Receive the update on the Atascadero Public Works Department Actions; and
2) Introduce for first reading by title only, the draft Ordinance amending Chapter
15, of the Atascadero Municipal Code, relating to trench cuts; and
3) Approve the Assessment District Program. [Public Works]
Public Works Director Steve Kahn gave the staff report and answered questions of Council.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Ann Ketcherside, stated she is opposed to spending City money on roads when we haven't
finished a Youth Center.
Mayor Arrambide closed the Public Comment period.
MOTION: By Council Member Johnson and seconded by Council Member Clay
to receive the update on the Atascadero Public Works Department
• Actions.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote.
MOTION: By Council Member Clay and seconded by Council Member Luna to
introduce for first reading by title only, the draft Ordinance
amending Chapter 15, of the Atascadero Municipal Code, relating to
trench cuts.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote.
A lengthy discussion ensued regarding the Assessment District Program.
MOTION: By Council Member Johnson and seconded by Council Member Luna
to approve the Assessment District Program including 60% of
affected property owners signing the petition, a process to inform
residents, before signing the petition, of an estimate of their proposed
annual costs including maintenance, plus an annual report to the
Council including the cost to the City.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote.
•
0130
CC 10/09/01
Page 5
2. Traffic Way Closure •
• Fiscal Impact: None
■ Staff recommendation: Council authorize the Public Works Director to temporarily
close Traffic Way for the construction of the public improvements as needed for
public safety and construction operations. [Public Works]
Public Works Director Steve Kahn introduced the applicant who discussed the road closure
request.
Russ Thompson, R. Thompson Consulting, Civil Engineer, representing Bob Shannon, explained
the difficulties the contractors have encountered and asked the Council to approve the road
closure so they can complete the work before the rainy season. Mr. Thompson answered
questions of Council.
MOTION: By Council Member Johnson and seconded by Council Member Luna
to approve staffs recommendation with a 60-day stipulation.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote.
D. COMMITTEE REPORTS:
Council Member Clay
Air Pollution Control District (APCD): Discussed the controversy over the appropriation of i
funds to a church for a chipper to be used in a specific area in Nipomo, and came to a decision to
go along with the action as it was being used for the community. There is a smoke management
ordinance that is being worked on which is State wide and will encourage burning as controlled
burns are more beneficial than allowing brush accumulate.
E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION:
City Council
Council Member Clay thanked the Council for their support for the youth programs.
City Treasurer
Invited everyone to the Lion's Club Breakfast, Saturday, 6:30 p.m. at the Junior High School.
Mayor Arrambide announced that Mayor Pro Tem Scalise has been appointed as representative
to the EVC.
Public Works Director Steve Kahn announced that the free residential garbage clean up day
would be October 20, 2001, notice will be sent out shortly.
CC 10/09/01 3
Page 6
F. ADJOURNMENT:
Mayor Arrambide adjourned the meeting at 8:40 p.m. to the next regularly scheduled meeting on
• October 23, 2001.
MEETING RECORDED AND MINUTES PREPARED BY:
Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk
Attachment A—Daphne Fahsing
•
•
CC 10/09/01 G 3 2
Page 7
Attachment : A
Atascadero City Council Mtg .
10-9-01
•
To: City Council Tuesday, Oct . 9, 2001
From: Daphne Fahsing Tel : 466-9299
Now that you have a respite from the General Plan, I 'd
like to ask you to consider early action on the bow and
arrow issue, which I brought to your attention Sept.je.il,
Also, I 'm asking that our ordinance on Animals be
brought up to date to conform more closely with the County
Title 9 Animal ordinance.
What I 'd like to do, with your consent, is to go over
the two ordinances with a staff member, to compare the
differences and changes , and come back to you with
recommendations for updating Atascadero ' s ordinance.
There are several instances, including the new law
requiring longer holding of animals before offering up for
adoption or euthanasia; and deletion of the limit on the •
number of animals allowed in a household. This particular
section of the ordinance is not enforced, cannot be
enforced, and would be corrected when and if complaints are
received .
May I use this as my official request? Thank you.
Com" '
033
ITEM NUMBER: A-3
1918a , 1979
DATE: 10-23-01
Atascadero City Council
Staff Report-Administrative Services Department
SEPTEMBER 2001 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE & PAYROLL
RECOMMENDATION
Approve certified City accounts payable,payroll and payroll vendor checks for September 2001.
DISCUSSION
Attached for City Council review and approval are the following:
Payroll
Dated 9/13/01 Checks#11231 - 11388 $ 194,389.16
• Dated 9/27/01 Checks# 11389 - 11544 170,235.33
Accounts Payable
Dated September 1-30, 2001 Checks # 80773 - 81168 &EFTs 557,259.35
TOTAL AMOUNT $ 921,883.84
FISCAL IMPACT
Total expenditures for all funds is $ 921,883.84
CERTIFICATION
The undersigned certifies that the attached demands have been released for payment and
that funds are available for these demands.
5 C-;,),
Raclielle Rickard,Administrative Services Director
Approved by the City Council at a meeting held October 23, 2001.
is
Marcia M.Torgerson, City Clerk
ATTACHMENT: September 2001 Eden Warrant Register in the amount of $ 557,259.35
034
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of September 2001
Check Check S
Number Date Vendor Description Amount
106 9/1/01 MID-STATE BANK Accounts Payable Check 86.00
102 9/4/01 MID-STATE BANK Payroll Vendor Payment 33,087.18
109 9/4/01 MID-STATE BANK Accounts Payable Check 114.56
80773 9/6/01 ALBERTSONS Accounts Payable Check 222.78
80774 9/6/01 JOE ALLEN Accounts Payable Check 349.95
80775 9/6/01 ALLIANCE TOWING Accounts Payable Check 258.50
80776 9/6/01 AMERICAN WEST TIRE&AUTO INC Accounts Payable Check 2,241.78
80777 9/6/01 ANDERSON'S AUTO SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 600.25
80778 9/6/01 APPLIED TECHNOLOGY GROUP,INC. Accounts Payable Check 8,992.64
80779 9/6/01 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 91.38
80780 9/6/01 VOID Accounts Payable Check 0.00
80781 9/6/01 ATASCADERO FORD Accounts Payable Check 373.54
80782 9/6/01 ATASCADERO MUTUAL WATER CO. Accounts Payable Check 250.00
80783 9/6/01 ATASCADERO NEWS Accounts Payable Check 804.43
80784 9/6/01 BAY LAUREL GARDEN CENTER Accounts Payable Check 11.46
80785 9/6/01 SANDRA CARROLL Accounts Payable Check 60.00
80786 9/6/01 CARROT-TOP INDUSTRIES,INC. Accounts Payable Check 40.50
80787 9/6/01 CDW GOVERNMENT,INC. Accounts Payable Check 662.38
80788 9/6/01 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL CED Accounts Payable Check 100.58
80789 .9/6/01 CHANNEL COUNTIES DIVISION Accounts Payable Check 84.00
80790 9/6/01 BRADY CHERRY Accounts Payable Check 300.00
80791 9/6/01 CHEVRON Accounts Payable Check 5.00
80792 9/6/01 CHIEF SUPPLY,INC. Accounts Payable Check 105.88
80793 9/6/01 CJP PRODUCTIONS Accounts Payable Check 4,900.00
80794 9/6/01 VOID Accounts Payable Check 0.00
80795 9/6/01 COASTAL IMAGING SUPPLIES Accounts Payable Check 67.41
80796 9/6/01 COASTLINE EQUIPMENT Accounts Payable Check 818.52
80797 9/6/01 COMCO COMPUTERS Accounts Payable Check 128.08
80798 9/6/01 CONWAY DISTRIBUTORS Accounts Payable Check 83.78
80799 9/6/01 CIMON CORMIER Accounts Payable Check 51.00
80800 9/6/01 CPOA Accounts Payable Check 450.00
80801 9/6/01 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER Accounts Payable Check 15.00
80802 9/6/01 CUESTA EQUIPMENT Accounts Payable Check 29.69 •
035
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of September 2001
heck Check
ber Date Vendor Description Amount
80803 9/6/01 DAN BIDDLE PEST CONTROL SERVIC Accounts Payable Check 95.00
80804 9/6/01 DENNIS MASSEY GRADING Accounts Payable Check 40.00
80805 9/6/01 DMV RENEWAL Accounts Payable Check 47.00
80806 9/6/01 PHIL DUNSMORE Accounts Payable Check 83.70
80807 9/6/01 DURHAM COMMUNICATIONS INC Accounts Payable Check 15,566.75
80808 9/6/01 MARIAH EARL Accounts Payable Check 40.00
80809 9/6/01 ECONOMIC DEVELOPERS OF CALIF Accounts Payable Check 250.00
80810 9/6/01 PEGGY EDWARDS Accounts Payable Check 12.17
80811 9/6/01 EL CAMINO BUILDING SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 44.94
80812 9/6/01 ROBYN ELLIOTT Accounts Payable Check 48.00
80813 9/6/01 ELLIOTT'S PHARMACY DBA MAXCARE Accounts Payable Check 62.50
80814 9/6/01 FARM SUPPLY COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 29.95
80815 9/6/01 FEDERAL SIGNAL CORP. Accounts Payable Check 68.68
80816 9/6/01 FERRELL'S AUTO REPAIR Accounts Payable Check 443.07
80817 9/6/01 FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE Accounts Payable Check 415.00
0 80818 9/6/01 FOOD FOR LESS Accounts Payable Check 158.11
80819 9/6/01 WARREN FRACE Accounts Payable Check 22.94
80820 9/6/01 GEM AUTO PARTS Accounts Payable Check 564.10
80821 9/6/01 GENERAL HOSPITAL Accounts Payable Check 93.00
80822 9/6/01 KENNETH GLYNN Accounts Payable Check 252.00
80823 9/6/01 JAMES GREENAWAY Accounts Payable Check 129.47
80824 9/6/01 GRISANTI HARDWARE Accounts Payable Check 93.91
80825 9/6/01 HAHN'S GUNS&AMMO Accounts Payable Check 417.50
80826 9/6/01 VOID Accounts Payable Check 0.00
80827 9/6/01 VOID Accounts Payable Check 0.00
80828 9/6/01 LISA HATFIELD Accounts Payable Check 60.00
80829 9/6/01 HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS Accounts Payable Check 1,089.00
80830 9/6/01 HOMELESS HOUSING PROJECT Accounts Payable Check 1,500.00
80831 9/6/01 CHERYL HOSIER Accounts Payable Check 35.69
80832 9/6/01 INFORMATION SERVICES DIVISION Accounts Payable Check 284.09
80833 9/6/01 STEPHANIE JACKSON Accounts Payable Check 60.00
80834 9/6/01 JIFFY LUBE#1932 PCJL,INC. Accounts Payable Check 112.30
. 80835 9/6/01 JOBS AVAILABLE,INC. Accounts Payable Check 101.20
80836 9/6/01 JOHN DEERE COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 13,408.97
036
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of September 2001
Check Check
Number Date Vendor Description Amount •
80837 9/6/01 VOID Accounts Payable Check 0.00
80838 9/6/01 JEB JONES Accounts Payable Check 33.00
80839 9/6/01 STEVEN KAHN Accounts Payable Check 300.00
80840 9/6/01 LESLYN KEITH Accounts Payable Check 21.00
80841 9/6/01 CHUCK KENDRICK Accounts Payable Check 102.00
80842 9/6/01 LCD AUTOMOTIVE Accounts Payable Check 65.00
80843 9/6/01 RUDY LORTON Accounts Payable Check 221.00
80844 9/6/01 LYNDON'S AUTOMOTIVE Accounts Payable Check 265.40
80845 9/6/01 TERESA MARSANO Accounts Payable Check 66.00
80846 9/6/01 JACK MARTIN Accounts Payable Check 25.00
80847 9/6/01 VOID Accounts Payable Check 0.00
80848 9/6/01 MID COAST FIRE PROTECTION Accounts Payable Check 12.50
80849 9/6/01 MID-COAST MOWER&SAW Accounts Payable Check 5.62
80850 9/6/01 EUGENE MILLER Accounts Payable Check 48.00
80851 9/6/01 PAUL MILLER Accounts Payable Check 170.00
80852 9/6/01 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 92.22
80853 9/6/01 MOORE'S WESTERN NURSERY Accounts Payable Check 23.33
80854 9/6/01 MYERS-STEVENS AND CO.,INC. Accounts Payable Check 98.00
80855 9/6/01 NORTH COUNTY GLASS Accounts Payable Check 214.76
80856 9/6/01 TIM O'MEARA Accounts Payable Check 102.00
80857 9/6/01 OPTIONS Accounts Payable Check 550.00
80858 9/6/01 OUTLET TOOL SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 69.75
80859 9/6/01 PACIFIC BELL Accounts Payable Check 65.00
80860 9/6/01 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC Accounts Payable Check 302.31
80861 9/6/01 PACIFIC HOME DO IT CENTER Accounts Payable Check 234.57
80862 9/6/01 PANASONIC COMMUNICATIONS Accounts Payable Check 944.55
80863 9/6/01 LORI PARCELLS Accounts Payable Check 300.00
80864 9/6/01 PASO ROBLES TRUCK CENTER Accounts Payable Check 1,334.41
80865 9/6/01 MIKE PERKINS Accounts Payable Check 169.88
80866 9/6/01 PRO MOTION Accounts Payable Check 96.30
80867 9/6/01 PRODUCERS DAIRY FOODS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 20.80
80868 9/6/01 QUILL CORPORATION Accounts Payable Check 360.89
80869 9/6/01 RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATES OF SLO Accounts Payable Check 41.00 •
80870 9/6/01 BRIAN RAINBOLT Accounts Payable Check 30.00
037
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of September 2001
heck Check
mber Date Vendor Description Amount
80871 9/6/01 RAINBOW AUTO&TOWING Accounts Payable Check 150.00
80872 9/6/01 RECOGNITION WORKS Accounts Payable Check 5.35
80873 9/6/01 REVENUE&COST SPECIALISTS LLC Accounts Payable Check 784.90
80874 9/6/01 RACHELLE RICKARD Accounts Payable Check 300.00
80875 9/6/01 JOHN RODGERS Accounts Payable Check 14.31
80876 9/6/01 SAN JOAQUIN SUPPLY COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 82.32
80877 9/6/01 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY VISITOR Accounts Payable Check 7,350.00
80878 9/6/01 SANTA MARIA TIRE,INC. Accounts Payable Check 50.44
80879 9/6/01 VIRGINIA SCHAFFER Accounts Payable Check 8.00
80880 9/6/01 LISETTE SCHOLL Accounts Payable Check 24.50
80881 9/6/01 SERVPRO Accounts Payable Check 525.00
80882 9/6/01 VOID Accounts Payable Check 0.00
80883 9/6/01 JOHN SIEMENS Accounts Payable Check 52.10
80884 9/6/01 SIERRA VISTA REGIONAL MEDICAL Accounts Payable Check 360.50
80885 9/6/01 SIGN HERE Accounts Payable Check 171.20
• 80886 9/6/01 TOM SILVA Accounts Payable Check 153.00
80887 9/6/01 CHARLES L.SMITH Accounts Payable Check 136.00
80888 9/6/01 SO CA TRAINING OFFICERS ASSN Accounts Payable Check 125.00
80889 9/6/01 SYLVESTER'S SECURITY ALARMS Accounts Payable Check 435.00
80890 9/6/01 T-N-T PEST CONTROL Accounts Payable Check 88.00
80891 9/6/01 TEDAS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 18,019.40
80892 9/6/01 VOID Accounts Payable Check 0.00
80893 9/6/01 TRIBUNE Accounts Payable Check 156.00
80894 9/6/01 UNISOURCE MAINT SUPPLY SYSTEMS Accounts Payable Check 123.20
80895 9/6/01 UPSTAIRS CAR STEREO Accounts Payable Check 37.40
80896 9/6/01 TOM VELASQUEZ Accounts Payable Check 136.00
80897 9/6/01 VERIZON WIRELESS Accounts Payable Check 98.14
80898 9/6/01 TINA VILLALON Accounts Payable Check 119.00
80899 9/6/01 VONS Accounts Payable Check 59.39
80900 9/6/01 VONS EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION Accounts Payable Check 150.00
80901 9/6/01 WESTERN JANITOR SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 56.47
80902 9/6/01 WILLIAM P.WHITE Accounts Payable Check 70.00
• 80903 9/13/01 MASTERCARD DEPARTMENT 1850 Accounts Payable Check 1,847.49
80904 9/13/01 GAS COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 922.13
038
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of September 2001
Check Check
Number Date Vendor Description Amount
80905 9/14/01 ATASCADERO FED.CREDIT UNION Payroll Vendor Payment 5,560.00
80906 9/14/01 ATASCADERO FIRE DEPT EMP.ASSN Payroll Vendor Payment 210.00
80907 9/14/01 ATASCADERO MID MGRS ORG UNION Payroll Vendor Payment 30.00
80908 9/14/01 ATASCADERO POLICE OFFICERS ASN Payroll Vendor Payment 333.25
80909 9/14/01 COUNTY-CITY EMPLOYEES CU Payroll Vendor Payment 895.00
80910 9/14/01 EMPLOYMENT DEV DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 10,135.27
80911 9/14/01 EMPLOYMENT DEV.DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 716.49
80912 9/14/01 FAMILY SUPPORT DIVISION Payroll Vendor Payment 261.69
80913 9/14/01 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE Payroll Vendor Payment 5,100.62
80914 9/14/01 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 Payroll Vendor Payment 500.00
80915 9/14/01 KENNEDY CLUB FITNESS Payroll Vendor Payment 47.00
80916 9/14/01 PERS LONG TERM CARE PROGRAM Payroll Vendor Payment 59.07
80917 9/14/01 SEIU LOCAL 620 AFL-CIO Payroll Vendor Payment 550.40
80918 9/14/01 FAMILY SUPPORT DIVISION Payroll Vendor Payment 444.00
80919 9/14/01 UNITED WAY OF SLO COUNTY Payroll Vendor Payment 38.00
80920 9/14/01 WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK Payroll Vendor Payment 1,112.45
80921 9/14/01 WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK Payroll Vendor Payment 432.00 •
107 9/18/01 MID-STATE BANK Payroll Vendor Payment 43,560.19
80922 9/18/01 PUBLIC EMPL RETIREMENT SYSTEM Payroll Vendor Payment 21,164.07
80923 9/20/01 EMPLOYMENT DEV.DEPARTMENT Accounts Payable Check 74.00
80924 9/20/01 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE CO Payroll Vendor Payment 716.73
80925 9/20/01 COLONIAL LIFE&ACCIDENT INS. Payroll Vendor Payment 2,084.20
80926 9/20/01 CPIC LIFE Payroll Vendor Payment 1,363.45
80927 9/20/01 DELTA DENTAL,ATTN:ACCOUNTING Payroll Vendor Payment 6,411.46
80928 9/20/01 EQUITABLE LIFE Payroll Vendor Payment 348.88
80929 9/20/01 LIFEGUARD INC. Payroll Vendor Payment 33,322.25
80930 9/21/01 ACTION FAX&PRINTER Accounts Payable Check 94.45
80931 9/21/01 ACTION TOWING Accounts Payable Check 48.75
80932 9/21/01 ADCARE,ADULT DAY SERVICE CTRS Accounts Payable Check 750.00
80933 9/21/01 ADMINISTRATIVE FIRE SVCS SECT Accounts Payable Check 25.00
80934 9/21/01 ALLSTAR FIRE EQUIPMENT,INC. Accounts Payable Check 442.72
80935 9/21/01 AMERICAN RED CROSS Accounts Payable Check 700.00
80936 9/21/01 AMERICAN WEST TIRE&AUTO INC Accounts Payable Check 381.12
80937 9/21/01 AMK FOODSERVICE COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 86.09
039
City of Ataseadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of September 2001
heck Check
her Date Vendor Description Amount
80938 9/21/01 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 474.13
80939 9/21/01 ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF SLO CO. Accounts Payable Check 1,300.00
80940 9/21/01 AT&T Accounts Payable Check 26.46
80941 9/21/01 ATASCADERO COLONY DAYS Accounts Payable Check 20.00
80942 9/21/01 ATASCADERO FORD Accounts Payable Check 1,149.03
80943 9/21/01 ATASCADERO LOAVES&FISHES Accounts Payable Check 2,000.00
80944 9/21/01 ATASCADERO MUTUAL WATER CO. Accounts Payable Check 13,948.85
80945 9/21/01 ATASCADERO NEWS Accounts Payable Check 475.30
80946 9/21/01 AVAYA INC. Accounts Payable Check 44.72
80947 9/21/01 BILLOW'S CUSTOM EMBROIDERY Accounts Payable Check 272.85
80948 9/21/01 BRENDLER JANITORIAL SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 500.00
80949 9/21/01 BUELLTON-RANCHO SANTA BARBARA Accounts Payable Check 184.80
80950 9/21/01 CAL-COAST REFRIGERATION,INC Accounts Payable Check 1,347.38
80951 9/21/01 CAL-STATE AUTO GLASS Accounts Payable Check 103.38
80952 9/21/01 CALIF DEPT OF FORESTRY&FIRE Accounts Payable Check 85.00
80953 9/21/01 CAMP GOLDEN HEART,INC. Accounts Payable Check 350.00
80954 9/21/01 CANNON ASSOCIATES Accounts Payable Check 31,461.62
80955 9/21/01 CARING CALLERS Accounts Payable Check 200.00
80956 9/21/01 CASA OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY Accounts Payable Check 1,000.00
80957 9/21/01 CDW GOVERNMENT,INC. Accounts Payable Check 971.87
80958 9/21/01 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL CED Accounts Payable Check 75.57
80959 9/21/01 CELLULARONE Accounts Payable Check 829.89
80960 9/21/01 CENTRAL COAST PLUMBING SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 12.50
80961 9/21/01 CENTRAL COAST SANITATION Accounts Payable Check 56.58
80962 9/21/01 CENTRAL COAST STRIPING Accounts Payable Check 800.00
80963 9/21/01 CFCA ODYSSEY 2001 Accounts Payable Check 250.00
80964 9/21/01 CHEM CLEAN Accounts Payable Check 216.30
80965 9/21/01 CHEVRON Accounts Payable Check 1,037.54
80966 9/21/01 CHICAGO GRADE LANDFILL,INC. Accounts Payable Check 90.30
80967 9/21/01 CLEAN WATER OUTLET Accounts Payable Check 35.00
80968 9/21/01 KATHLEEN CODY Accounts Payable Check 18.00
80969 9/21/01 COMCO COMPUTERS Accounts Payable Check 115.14
• 80970 9/21/01 VINCE CONDE Accounts Payable Check 105.00
80971 9/21/01 COPWARE Accounts Payable Check 61.85
G40
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of September 2001
Check Check
Number Date Vendor Description Amount •
80972 9/21/01 CIMON CORMIER Accounts Payable Check 68.00
80973 9/21/01 COUNTRY COPY Accounts Payable Check 42.80
80974 9/21/01 CPOA Accounts Payable Check 171.00
80975 9/21/01 CREATIVE ALTERNATIVE FOR Accounts Payable Check 1,700.00
80976 9/21/01 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER Accounts Payable Check 193.00
80977 9/21/01 CSAIA Accounts Payable Check 350.00
80978 9/21/01 CUESTA COLLEGE Accounts Payable Check 596.45
80979 9/21/01 DARRYL'S LOCK AND SAFE Accounts Payable Check 43.87
80980 9/21/01 DAVID M FLEISHMAN Accounts Payable Check 800.00
80981 9/21/01 DECOU LUMBER COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 1,074.05
80982 9/21/01 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Accounts Payable Check 280.00
80983 9/21/01 DIVERSIFIED RISK INSURANCE Accounts Payable Check 2,424.76
80984 9/21/01 DONALD L.PETERS,D.C. Accounts Payable Check 75.00
80985 9/21/01 PHIL DUNSMORE Accounts Payable Check 25.00
80986 9/21/01 EASY AD Accounts Payable Check 41.50
80987 9/21/01 EL CAMINO BUILDING SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 16.00
80988 9/21/01 EL CAMINO CAR WASH LLC Accounts Payable Check 54.00 •
80989 9/21/01 EL CAMINO VETERINARY HOSP Accounts Payable Check 203.00
80990 9/21/01 ENTENMANN-ROVIN CO. Accounts Payable Check 641.65
80991 9/21/01 EOC HOMELESS SHELTER PROGRAM Accounts Payable Check 750.00
80992 9/21/01 EOC MENTORING PROGRAM Accounts Payable Check 750.00
80993 9/21/01 EXXON MOBIL Accounts Payable Check 212.59
80994 9/21/01 FAMILY SERVICES CENTER Accounts Payable Check 500.00
80995 9/21/01 FARM SUPPLY COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 24.05
80996 9/21/01 FEDERAL EXPRESS Accounts Payable Check 17.04
80997 9/21/01 FENDER'S AUTO SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 194.93
80998 9/21/01 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES,INC. Accounts Payable Check 72.98
80999 9/21/01 FGL ENVIRONMENTAL Accounts Payable Check 518.40
81000 9/21/01 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE Accounts Payable Check 1,000.00
81001 9/21/01 FISHER SCIENTIFIC Accounts Payable Check 74.02
81002 9/21/01 FOOD BANK COALITION OF SLO CO Accounts Payable Check 1,000.00
81003 9/21/01 FOOD FOR LESS Accounts Payable Check 633.67
81004 9/21/01 FRAZEE PAINTS Accounts Payable Check 279.44 •
81005 9/21/01 GAS COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 74.21
041
City of Ataseadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of September 2001
heck Check
mber Date Vendor Description Amount
81006 9/21/01 GEM AUTO PARTS Accounts Payable Check 670.53
81007 9/21/01 MIKE GIL Accounts Payable Check 30.00
81008 9/21/01 GOLDING CONCRETE SAWING Accounts Payable Check 142.50
81009 9/21/01 GRISANTI HARDWARE Accounts Payable Check 9.70
81013 9/21/01 GST CALL AMERICA Accounts Payable Check 885.61
81014 9/21/01 DAVID GUERENA Accounts Payable Check 18.00
81015 9/21/01 H.D.PETERSON Accounts Payable Check 737.45
81016 9/21/01 HARMONY MACHINE&WELDING Accounts Payable Check 278.20
81017 9/21/01 HART IMPRESSIONS PRINT© Accounts Payable Check 108.04
81018 9/21/01 HAWTHORNE SUITES HOTEL Accounts Payable Check 297.00
81019 9/21/01 ANN HOCHSTETLER Accounts Payable Check 70.00
81020 9/21/01 CHERYL HOSIER Accounts Payable Check 10.51
81021 9/21/01 HOSPICE OF SLO COUNTY,INC. Accounts Payable Check 500.00
81022 9/21/01 HOTLINE OF SLO COUNTY Accounts Payable Check 900.00
81023 9/21/01 INFORMATION SERVICES DIVISION Accounts Payable Check 462.00
• 81024 9/21/01 EVELYN INGRAM Accounts Payable Check 137.43
81025 9/21/01 JENCKS LAW GROUP Accounts Payable Check 97.60
81026 9/21/01 JESPERSEN'S TIRE SERVICE,INC. Accounts Payable Check 246.23
81027 9/21/01 JIFFY LUBE#1932 PCJL,INC. Accounts Payable Check 112.13
81028 9/21/01 K-MART Accounts Payable Check 10.68
81029 9/21/01 KEN'S MOBIL SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 967.43
81030 9/21/01 CHUCK KENDRICK Accounts Payable Check 102.00
81031 9/21/01 KEY TERMITE&PEST CONTROL Accounts Payable Check 225.00
81032 9/21/01 LEE WILSON ELECTRIC CO.INC Accounts Payable Check 980.00
81033 9/21/01 LIFE ASSIST,INC. Accounts Payable Check 197.95
81034 9/21/01 LIFESPAN RETIRED&SR VOL PRGM Accounts Payable Check 500.00
81035 9/21/01 LONGS DRUG STORES Accounts Payable Check 47.43
81036 9/21/01 LYNDON'S AUTOMOTIVE Accounts Payable Check 183.60
81037 9/21/01 MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK,INC. Accounts Payable Check 158.62
81038 9/21/01 DEBBIE MARKS-MOLFINO Accounts Payable Check 250.00
81039 9/21/01 SAM MCMILLAN Accounts Payable Check 30.00
81040 9/21/01 MICHAEL'S Accounts Payable Check 15.00
• 81041 9/21/01 MID-COAST MOWER&SAW Accounts Payable Check 175.37
81042 9/21/01 PAUL MILLER Accounts Payable Check 187.00
042
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of September 2001
Check Check •
Number Date Vendor Description Amount
81043 9/21/01 MIRACLE RECREATION EQUIPMENT Accounts Payable Check 5,060.23
81044 9/21/01 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 82.00
81045 9/21/01 MOSS,LEVY,&HARTZHEIM Accounts Payable Check 2,000.00
81046 9/21/01 MUFF COMPANY INC. Accounts Payable Check 200.00
81047 9/21/01 MUSIC FACTORY Accounts Payable Check 265.90
81048 9/21/01 MYERS-STEVENS AND CO.,INC. Accounts Payable Check 94.50
81049 9/21/01 NORTH COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY Accounts Payable Check 5,000.00
81050 9/21/01 NORTH COUNTY WOMENS SHELTER Accounts Payable Check 3,000.00
81051 9/21/01 OFFICEMAX CREDIT PLAN Accounts Payable Check 668.77
81052 9/21/01 HEATHER OSGOOD Accounts Payable Check 78.74
81053 9/21/01 OUTLET TOOL SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 367.96
81068 9/21/01 PACIFIC BELL Accounts Payable Check 6,020.16
81069 9/21/01 PACIFIC GAS&ELECTRIC Accounts Payable Check 1,500.00
81070 9/21/01 PACIFIC GAS&ELECTRIC Accounts Payable Check 3,500.00
81072 9/21/01 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC Accounts Payable Check 31,913.82
81073 9/21/01 PACIFIC HOME DO IT CENTER Accounts Payable Check 493.73
81074 9/21/01 PAPER WORKS Accounts Payable Check 64.20 •
81075 9/21/01 PASO ROBLES ELECTRIC,INC. Accounts Payable Check 122.01
81076 9/21/01 PASO ROBLES TRUCK CENTER Accounts Payable Check 313.32
81077 9/21/01 PENNY MEN Accounts Payable Check 241.50
81078 9/21/01 MIKE PEREZ Accounts Payable Check 30.00
81079 9/21/01 PERRY'S PARCEL SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 40.35
81080 9/21/01 PETE JOHNSTON CHEVROLET Accounts Payable Check 54.69
81081 9/21/01 FIRE DEPARTMENT PETTY CASH Accounts Payable Check 95.73
81082 9/21/01 POLICE DEPARTMENT PETTY CASH Accounts Payable Check 207.96
81083 9/21/01 PFLUM'S ATASCADERO MUFFLER Accounts Payable Check 44.98
81084 9/21/01 POOR RICHARD'S PRESS Accounts Payable Check 188.90
81085 9/21/01 PORAC LAW ENFORCEMENT NEWS Accounts Payable Check 120.00
81086 9/21/01 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION,INC. Accounts Payable Check 221.91
81087 9/21/01 QUILL CORPORATION Accounts Payable Check 599.18
81088 9/21/01 VICKI RABOURN Accounts Payable Check 250.00
81089 9/21/01 RADIO SHACK Accounts Payable Check 9.61
81090 9/21/01 RAINBOW MEALWORMS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 36.55 •
81091 9/21/01 RECOGNITION WORKS Accounts Payable Check 41.73
043
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of September 2001
heck Check
ber Date Vendor Description Amount
81092 9/21/01 RED'S PLUMBING Accounts Payable Check 63.00
81093 9/21/01 CAROLE ROBINSON Accounts Payable Check 157.00
81094 9/21/01 JOHN RODGERS Accounts Payable Check 105.00
81095 9/21/01 STEVE ROMO Accounts Payable Check 105.00
81096 9/21/01 SAN JOAQUIN SUPPLY COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 188.98
81097 9/21/01 SANTA MARIA TIRE,INC. Accounts Payable Check 567.43
81098 9/21/01 GRACE PUCCI,SECRETARIAL SERVICES BY GRAccounts Payable Check 720.00
81099 9/21/01 SENIOR LEGAL SERVICES PROJECT Accounts Payable Check 400.00
81100 9/21/01 SENIOR NUTRITION PROGRAM Accounts Payable Check 700.00
81101 9/21/01 SENIOR PEER COUNSELING PROGRAM Accounts Payable Check 400.00
81102 9/21/01 SIERRA VISTA REGIONAL MEDICAL Accounts Payable Check 33.50
81103 9/21/01 TOM SILVA Accounts Payable Check 340.00
81104 9/21/01 SLO COUNTY AIDS SUPPORT NETWOR Accounts Payable Check 500.00
81105 9/21/01 CHARLES L.SMITH Accounts Payable Check 136.00
81106 9/21/01 SOFTWARE SPECTRUM Accounts Payable Check 168.31
81107 9/21/01 STEWART'S WHEEL SHOP Accounts Payable Check 135.00
81108 9/21/01 KURT W. STONE Accounts Payable Check 140.00
81109 9/21/01 SUNLIGHT JANITORIAL Accounts Payable Check 1,210.00
81110 9/21/01 SUPERIOR QUALITY COPIERS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 699.54
81111 9/21/01 TEMPLETON FEED&GRAIN Accounts Payable Check 61.50
81112 9/21/01 TEMPLETON IMAGING MEDICAL CORP Accounts Payable Check 99.00
81113 9/21/01 TERRY&PAULSON ENTERPRISE INC Accounts Payable Check 84.04
81114 9/21/01 VOID Accounts Payable Check 0.00
81115 9/21/01 TRAINING INSTITUTE Accounts Payable Check 455.67
81116 9/21/01 TRANSITIONS-MENTAL HEALTH ASSC Accounts Payable Check 600.00
81117 9/21/01 TRIBUNE Accounts Payable Check 1,835.00
81118 9/21/01 TURF STAR,INC. Accounts Payable Check 377.74
81119 9/21/01 U.S.ARMOR CORPORATION Accounts Payable Check 8,494.80
81120 9/21/01 U.S.BANK TRUST NATL ASSOC Accounts Payable Check 173.18
81121 9/21/01 UNION ASPHALT,INC. Accounts Payable Check 560.59
81122 9/21/01 UNISOURCE MAINT SUPPLY SYSTEMS Accounts Payable Check 164.27
81123 9/21/01 UNITED GREEN MARK,INC. Accounts Payable Check 509.78
is
81124 9/21/01 UNOCAL Accounts Payable Check 4,396.07
81125 9/21/01 UPSTAIRS CAR STEREO Accounts Payable Check 140.95
044
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of September 2001
.Check Check •
Number Date Vendor Description Amount
81126 9/21/01 TOM VELASQUEZ Accounts Payable Check 164.00
81127 9/21/01 VERIZON WIRELESS Accounts Payable Check 194.71
81128 9/21/01 VERIZON WIRELESS Accounts Payable Check 4.54
81129 9/21/01 VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS Accounts Payable Check 90.54
81130 9/21/01 TINA VILLALON Accounts Payable Check 136.00
81131 9/21/01 ERIC VITALE Accounts Payable Check 157.00
81132 9/21/01 WEST-MARK Accounts Payable Check 224.70
81133 9/21/01 WESTERN FARM SERVICE,INC. Accounts Payable Check 1,186.58
81134 9/21/01 WESTERN JANITOR SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 363.84
81135 9/21/01 WILSON LAND SURVEYS Accounts Payable Check 390.63
81136 9/21/01 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES,INC. Accounts Payable Check 335.26
81137 9/24/01 WADE MCKINNEY Accounts Payable Check 400.00
81138 9/25/01 MASTERCARD DEPARTMENT 4101 Accounts Payable Check 130.90
81139 9/25/01 MASTERCARD DEPARTMENT 4135 Accounts Payable Check 277.21
81140 9/25/01 MASTERCARD DEPARTMENT 4150 Accounts Payable Check 835.79
81141 9/25/01 MASTERCARD DEPARTMENT 4168 Accounts Payable Check 22.20
81142 9/25/01 MASTERCARD DEPARTMENT 6090 Accounts Payable Check 3,037.52 .
81143 9/25/01 MASTERCARD DEPARTMENT 6108 Accounts Payable Check 309.20
81144 9/25/01 MASTERCARD DEPARTMENT 9902 Accounts Payable Check 366.66
81145 9/25/01 WEST-MARK Accounts Payable Check 60,447.00
81146 9/26/01 JASON LECLAIR Accounts Payable Check 186.30
81147 9/26/01 WAYNE LYONS Accounts Payable Check 186.30
81148 9/26/01 FINANCE DEPARTMENT PETTY CASH Accounts Payable Check 343.94
81167 9/27/01 SAN LUIS PERSONNEL INC. Accounts Payable Check 6,360.48
81149 9/28/01 ATASCADERO FED.CREDIT UNION Payroll Vendor Payment 5,210.00
81150 9/28/01 ATASCADERO FIRE DEPT EMP.ASSN Payroll Vendor Payment 210.00
81151 9/28/01 ATASCADERO MID MGRS ORG UNION Payroll Vendor Payment 30.00
81152 9/28/01 ATASCADERO POLICE OFFICERS ASN Payroll Vendor Payment 333.25
81153 9/28/01 COUNTY-CITY EMPLOYEES CU Payroll Vendor Payment 895.00
81154 9/28/01 EMPLOYMENT DEV DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 7,533.94
81155 9/28/01 EMPLOYMENT DEV.DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 629.32
81156 9/28/01 FAMILY SUPPORT DIVISION Payroll Vendor Payment 261.69
81157 9/28/01 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE Payroll Vendor Payment 5,100.62 •
81158 9/28/01 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 Payroll Vendor Payment 500.00 A
GA5
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of September 2001
heck Check
her Date Vendor Description Amount
81159 9/28/01 KENNEDY CLUB FITNESS Payroll Vendor Payment 47.00
81160 9/28/01 PERS LONG TERM CARE PROGRAM Payroll Vendor Payment 59.07
81161 9/28/01 PUBLIC EMPL RETIREMENT SYSTEM Payroll Vendor Payment 17,837.11
81162 9/28/01 SEIU LOCAL 620 AFL-CIO Payroll Vendor Payment 451.87
81163 9/28/01 FAMILY SUPPORT DIVISION Payroll Vendor Payment 444.00
81164 9/28/01 UNITED WAY OF SLO COUNTY Payroll Vendor Payment 38.00
81165 9/28/01 WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK Payroll Vendor Payment 1,173.48
81166 9/28/01 WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK Payroll Vendor Payment 432.00
81168 9/28/01 VOID Accounts Payable Check 0.00
$557,259.35
is
•
Q4
ITEM NUMBER: A-4
DATE: 10/23/2001
• n
..wa
1918 P ' 1979
Atascadero City Council
Staff Report - Public Works Department
Trench Cut Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION:
City Council introduce for second reading by title only, and adopt the draft Ordinance amending
Title 7, Public Works, Chapter 15, Encroachments on Public Property, of the Atascadero
Municipal Code by adding Article 15, Trench Cuts.
DISCUSSION:
On October 9, 2001, the City Council conducted a public hearing to consider amending the Title
7, Public Works, Chapter 15, Encroachments on Public Property, of the Atascadero Municipal
• Code. The proposed changes would add Article 15, Trench Cuts,to the Atascadero Municipal
Code. There were no changes made by the City Council to the Ordinance during its first reading
and it is ready for final adoption as attached.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The cost of the administration of the Trench Cut Program and the inspection of the trench cut
will be reimbursed to the City by the agency, utility, company, developer or individual cutting the
road surface.
ATTACHMENTS: Draft Ordinance
047
DRAFT ORDINANCE
AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO
AMENDING CHAPTER 15, ENCROACHMENT ON PUBLIC PROPERTY
OF THE ATASCADERO MUNICIPAL CODE,
RELATING TO TRENCH CUTS
The City Council hereby finds and declares as follows:
WHEREAS, the City of Atascadero spends millions of dollars annually to improve and
maintain public streets and alleys (hereinafter streets);
WHEREAS, studies undertaken for the cities of Austin, Kansas City, Burlington,
Cincinnati, Phoenix, San Francisco, Sacramento and Los Angeles have concluded that
excavations in paved streets degrade and shorten the life of the surface of the streets, and this
degradation increases the frequency and cost to the public of necessary resurfacing, maintenance
and repair. The studies performed on streets in the cities of Los Angeles and San Francisco have
concluded that pavement degradation occurs no matter how well the excavation is restored;
WHEREAS, the cutting of the pavement and trenching in the streets permits water
seepage into the street as well as weakening pavement support around the patch, thereby
allowing deterioration at an accelerated rate; •
WHEREAS, millions of dollars in public funds have been invested to build, maintain,
and repair the streets within the City's geographical boundaries, and the City holds these streets
as an asset for its citizens. It is desirable to adopt regulations that will help protect the structural
integrity of City streets and thereby safeguard the value of the public investments in City streets
for the benefit of all City residents, by requiring proper repair with quality materials, inspection,
and follow up inspection and further repair if the trench repair fails, to help offset the shortened
life of the streets that are cut.
WHEREAS, entities making and benefiting from an excavation in a City street also will
comply with standards and requirements for compaction, backfill and pavement restoration and
resurfacing that ensure the best possible restoration of the paved surface over and adjacent to the
trench or cut;
WHEREAS, regulation of excavation in City streets to help reduce disruption of and
interference with public use of the streets, and to help prevent damage and maintain the safe
condition of the streets protects the public health, safety and welfare, is a valid and appropriate
exercise of the City's police power, and is a municipal affair;
WHEREAS, with respect to the installation of telecommunications facilities, Section
253(c) of the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 expressly recognizes the authority of
local governments to impose reasonable nondiscriminatory requirements upon
048
telecommunications providers using the public right-of-way, and California Government Code
50030 specifically authorizes the imposition of permit fees that do not exceed the reasonable
costs of providing the service for which the fee is charged. A Encroachment Permit Fee imposed
by this ordinance and any associated Resolution is such a reasonable fee.
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO DOES
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I ORDINANCE
Article 4 of Title 7, Public Works, Chapter 15, Encroachments on Public Property, of the
Atascadero Municipal Code is hereby amended, to add the following sections as follows:
7-15.419. Trench Cut. "Trench Cut" means the cutting of an existing asphalt road for the
installation, repair, location of utilities, conduit, storm drain, or any other underground facility.
7-15.420. Encroachment Permits. The Engineering Division of the Public Works Department
will now issue encroachment permits. In the past the Community Development Department
issued encroachment permits. Any persons working in the right-of-way with out an
encroachment permit will be stopped and required to obtain an encroachment permit. The fee for
the encroachment permit will be the actual cost to administer, inspect and 1 year inspect the
trench repair.
• 7-15.421. Inspection. A City inspector will inspect the trench cut. This will include asphalt
removal, digging of the trench, bedding of utility, backfill and compaction of trench, placement
of base material, saw cut for"T" section and paving.
7-15.422. Trench Specifications. Care in removal of existing asphalt and top trench material.
Mitigate ground water in the trench. Backfill shall be select material approved by the City
Engineer, sand, base or slurry. Native soil will not be allowed in the trench. Proof of compaction
of trench backfill. Saw cut and remove asphalt 18 inches from the edges of the trench after the
trench is backfilled. Pave to City Standard.
7-15.423. Cash bond and one year inspection. A cash bond will be taken when the encroachment
permit is issued. The City will inspect the trench 1-year after the trench is completed. The party
that requested the encroachment permit and put up the bond will repair all trench deficiencies
discovered at the inspection. This could includes crack seals, skin patch, remove and replace
trench paving and in extreme cases where the backfill has failed, remove all backfill, replace and
repave.
7-15.424. Trench Cut Moratorium. There will be a moratorium on trench cuts in a road for 2
years after it has been paved. The City will publish a two-year paving schedule every year to
keep the community and utility companies posted on the planned projects. If a utility needs an
emergency repair or new development occurs and the recently paved road needs to be cut the
road shall be repaired to the condition prior to the cut, including overlaying the entire road.
•
049
i
i
7-15.425. Provisions of Chapter 15.This Article does not change or alleviate anyone from
following the provisions of the entire Chapter 15 Encroachments On Public Property.
SECTION 2
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance is for any reason
deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent
jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance.
The City Council of the City of Atascadero hereby declares that it would have adopted this
ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof, irrespective f
the fact any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases or other portions
might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ADOPTED •
ATTEST:
Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk J. Michael Arrambide, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney
050
ITEM NUMBER: A-5
■' w'® ■!si DATE: 10/23/2001
iais 1979
Atascadero City Council
Staff Report— Public Works Department
Traffic Signal Interconnect Design, and Traffic Signal Synchronization
Project
RECOMMENDATION:
Council authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with Omni Means, Ltd. to design
the Traffic Signal Interconnect and Traffic Signal Synchronization with a maximum design
expenditure of $36,405.
DISCUSSION:
• A Request for Proposals was sent to companies specializing in Traffic Signal Interconnect
Design and Synchronization on January 11, 2001. The bid opening was March 1, 2001. Three
qualified companies returned proposals for this work. They were Keith B. Higgins & Associates,
Inc., Katz, Okitsu & Associates, and Omni Means. Upon opening the proposals, each were rated
by a review committee, on the following aspects, with a possible 100 points: Understanding of
the project (30), Methodology(20), Experience (20), Field Data(10), Caltrans Coordination(10),
Field Timing Review (10). Based upon these criteria, Omni Means received the highest average
score. While consultant services are not exclusively awarded based on low bid, Omni Means
was the lob bidder.
FISCAL IMPACT:
EXPENDITURES
Design $36,405
TOTAL PROJECT EXPENDITURES $36,405
•
4�1
ITEM NUMBER: A-5
DATE: 10/23/2001
REVENUES •
State Transportation Program(STP) Funds $302,000
TDA Article 8 Streets $15,900
TOTAL PROJECT REVENUES $317,900
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Award Contract
2. Do not Award Contract-Traffic signals on El Camino Real will remain unsynchronized.
ATTACHMENTS: Contract
•
•
052
CONTRACT#:
• AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES OF CONTRACTOR
or
CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT
This agreement is made upon the date of execution, as set forth below, by and between
Omni Means, a Limited Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Contractor", and the City of
Atascadero, California, a Municipal Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City". The parties
hereto, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, hereby agree to the following
terms and conditions:
1.00 GENERAL PROVISIONS
1.01 TERM: This agreement will become effective on the date of execution set forth
below, and will continue in effect until terminated as provided herein.
1.02 SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED BY CONTRACTOR: Contractor agrees to
perform or provide Traffic Signal Interconnection Design and Traffic Signal
Synchronization Services as specified in "Description of Services" attached hereto as
"Exhibit A"hereby incorporated herein.
Contractor shall determine the method, details and means of performing the
above-referenced services.
• Contractor may, at Contractor's own expense, employ such assistants, as
Contractor deems necessary to perform the services required of Contractor by this
agreement. City may not control, direct or supervise Contractor's assistants or employees
in the performance of those services.
1.03 COMPENSATION: In consideration for the services to be performed by
Contractor, City agrees to pay Contractor the consideration set forth in the amounts and
under the terms provided in"Exhibit B", hereby incorporated herein.
2.00 OBLIGATIONS OF CONTRACTOR
2.01 MINIMUM AMOUNT OF SERVICE BY CONTRACTOR: Contractor agrees to
devote the hours necessary to perform the services set forth in this agreement in an
efficient and effective manner. Contractor may represent, perform services for and be
employed by additional individuals or entities, in Contractor's sole discretion, as long as
the performance of these extra-contractual services does not interfere with or presents a
conflict with City's business.
2.02 TOOLS AND INSTRUMENTALITIES: Contractor shall provide all tools and
instrumentalities to perform the services under this agreement.
•
053
2.03 WORKER'S COMPENSATION AND OTHER EMPLOYEE BENEFITS: City
and Contractor intend and agree that Contractor is an independent contractor of City and •
agrees that Contractor and Contractor's employees and agents have no right to worker's
compensation and other employee benefits. If any worker insurance protection is desired,
Contractor agrees to provide worker's compensation and other employee benefits, where
required by law, for Contractor's employees and agents. Contractor agrees to hold
harmless and indemnify City for any and all claims arising out of any claim for injury,
disability, or death of any of Contractor and Contractor's employees or agents.
2.04 INDEMNIFICATION: Contractor hereby agrees to, and shall, hold City, its
elective and appointive boards, officers, agents and employees, harmless and shall defend
the same from any liability for damage or claims for damage, or suits or actions at law or
in equity which may allegedly arise from Contractor's or any of Contractor's employees'
agents' operations be by Contractor or by any one or more persons directly or indirectly
employed by, or acting as agent for, Contractor; provided as follows:
a. That the City does not, and shall not, waive any rights against Contractor which it
may have by reason of the aforesaid hold-harmless agreement, because of the
acceptance by City, or the deposit with City by Contractor, of any of the insurance
policies hereinafter described.
b. That the aforesaid hold-harmless agreement by Contractor shall apply to all
damages and claims for damages of every kind suffered, or alleged to have been
suffered, by reason of any of the aforesaid operations of Contractor or any agent •
or employee of Contractor regardless of whether or not such insurance policies
shall have been determined to be applicable to any of such damages or claims for
damages.
2.05 INSURANCE: Contractor shall not commence work under this contract until s/he shall
have obtained all insurance required under this section and such insurance shall have
been approved by City as to form, amount and carrier:
a. Public Liability and Property Damage Insurance. Contractor shall take out and
maintain during the life of this contract such public liability and property damage
insurance as shall protect City, its elective and appointive boards, officers, agents
and employees, and Contractor and any agents and employees performing work
covered by this contract from claims for damages for personal injury, including
death, as well as from claims for property damage which may arise from
Contractor's or any subcontractor's operations under this contract, whether such
operations be by Contractor or by anyone directly or indirectly employed by
contractor and the amounts of such insurance shall be as follows:
(1) Public Liability Insurance.
In an amount not less than $ 1,000,000 for injuries, including, but
not limited to death to any one person and, subject to the same
0
054
2
limit for each person, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 on
• account of any one occurrence;
(2) Property Damage Insurance.
In an amount of not less than $ 1,000,000 for damage to the
property of each person on account of any one occurrence.
(3) Comprehensive Automobile Liability.
Bodily injury liability coverage of$ 500,000
For each person in any one accident and $500,000 for injuries
sustained by two or more persons in any one accident. Property
damage liability of$500,000 for each accident.
(4) Worker's Compensation insurance.
In the amounts required by law as set forth in Section 2.03 above.
b. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions:
Any deductible or self-insured retention must be declared to, and approved by, the
City. The City may require that either the insurer reduce or eliminate such
deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the City, its elected or appointed
officials, employees, agents, or volunteers; or the contractor shall procure a bond
guaranteeing payment of all administration and legal expenses.
.
C. Proof of Insurance.
Contractor shall furnish City, concurrently with the execution hereof, with
satisfactory proof of carriage if the insurance required, and adequate legal
assurance that each carrier will give City at least thirty (30) days' prior notice of
the cancellation of any policy during the effective period of this contract. The
certificate or policy of liability of insurance shall name City as an additional
insured with the Contractor.
3.00 OBLIGATIONS OF CITY
3.01 COOPERATION: City agrees to comply with all reasonable requests of
Contractor necessary to the performance of Contractor's duties under this agreement.
4.00 TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT
4.01 TERMINATION ON NOTICE: Notwithstanding any other provision of this
agreement, at any time, without cause by giving at least 30 days prior written notice to
the other parties to this agreement.
4.02 TERMINATION ON OCCURRENCE OF STATED EVENTS: This
agreement shall terminate automatically on the occurrence of any of the following
events:
X55
3
(1) Bankruptcy or insolvency of any party;
(2) Sale of the business of any party; •
(3) Death of any party;
(4) The end of the (_30) days as set forth in Section 4.01;
(5) End of the contract to which Contractor's services wee necessary; or
(6) Assignment of this agreement by Contractor without the consent of the
City.
4.03 TERMINATION BY ANY PARTY FOR DEFAULT OF CONTRACTOR:
Should any party default in the performance of this agreement or materially
breach any of its provisions, a non-breaching party, at their option, may terminate this
agreement, immediately, by giving written notice of termination to the breaching party.
4.04 TERMINATION: This Agreement shall terminate on April 1, 2002 unless
extended as set forth in this Section. The City, with the agreement of the Contractor, is
authorized to extend the term of this Agreement beyond the termination date, as needed,
under the same terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. Any such extension
shall be in writing and be an amendment to this Agreement.
5.00 SPECIAL PROVISIONS
(Optional)
6.00 MISCELLANEOUS
6.01 REMEDIES: The remedies set forth in this agreement shall not be •
exclusive but shall be cumulative with, and in addition to , all remedies new or hereafter
allowed by law or equity.
6.02 NO WAIVER: The waiver of any breach by any party of any provision of
this agreement shall not constitute a continuing waiver or a waiver of any subsequent
breach of this agreement.
6.03 ASSIGNMENT: This agreement is specifically not assignable by Contractor
to any person or entity. Any assignment or attempt to assign by Contractor, whether it be
voluntary or involuntary, by operation of law or otherwise, is void and is a material
breach of this agreement giving rise to a right to terminate asset forth in Section 4.03.
6.04 ATTORNEY FEES: In the event of any controversy, claim or dispute between
the parties hereto, arising out of or relating to this agreement, or the breach thereof, the
prevailing party shall be entitled, in addition to other such relief as may be granted, to a
reasonable sum as and for attorney fees.
6.05 TIME FOR PERFORMANCE: Except as otherwise expressly provided for
in this agreement, should the performance of any act required by this agreement to be
performed by either party be prevented or delayed by reason by any act of God, strike,
lockout, labor trouble, inability to secure materials, or any other cause except financial
inability not the fault of the party required to perform the act, the time for performance of •
056
4
the act will be extended for a period of time equivalent to the period of delay and
• performance of the act during the period of delay will be excused; provided, however,
that nothing contained in this Section shall exclude the prompt payment by either party as
required by this agreement or the performance of any act rendered difficult or impossible
solely because of the financial condition of the party required to perform the act.
6.06 NOTICES: Except as otherwise expressly provided by law, any and all notices
or other communications required or permitted by this agreement or by law to be served
on or given to any party to this agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed duly
served and given when personally delivered or in lieu of such personal service when
deposited in the United States mail, first-class postage prepaid to the following address
for each respective party:
PARTY ADDRESS
A. CITY OF ATASCADERO 6500 Palma Avenue
Atascadero, CA 93422
Attention: (Public Works Department)
B.
(Contractor)
• 6.07 GOVERNING LAW: This agreement and all matters relating to this
g g
agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California in force at the time any
need for the interpretation of this agreement or any decision or holding concerning this
agreement arises.
6.08 BINDING EFFECT: This agreement shall be binding on and shall inure
to the benefit of the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the parties
hereto, but nothing in this Section shall be construed as a consent by City to any
assignment of this agreement or any interest in this agreement.
6.09 SEVERABILITY: Should any provision of this agreement be held by a court
of competent jurisdiction or by a legislative or rulemaking act to be either invalid, void or
unenforceable, the remaining provisions of this agreement shall remain in full force and
effect, unimpaired by the holding, legislation or rule.
6.10 SOLE AND ENTIRE AGREEMENT: This agreement constitutes the sole
and entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. This
agreement correctly sets forth the obligations of the parties hereto to each other as of the
sate of this agreement. All agreements or representations respecting the subject matter of
this agreement not expressly set forth or referred to in this agreement are null and void.
6.11 TIME: Time is expressly declared to be of the essence of this agreement.
057
5
6.12 DUE AUTHORITY:The parties hereby represent that the individuals executing •
this agreement are expressly authorized to do so on and in behalf of the parties.
6.13 CONSTRUCTION: The parties agree that each has had an opportunity to have
their counsel review this agreement and that any rule of construction to the effect that
ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting party shall not apply in the
interpretation of this agreement or any amendments of exhibits thereto. The captions of
the sections are for convenience and reference only, and are not intended to be construed
to define or limit the provisions to which they relate.
6.14 AMENDMENTS: Amendments to this agreement shall be in writing and shall
be made only with the mutual written consent of all of the parties to this agreement.
Executed on , 2001, at Atascadero
Attest: CITY OF ATASCADERO
By:
Marcia McClure Torgerson Wade G. McKinney
City Clerk City Manager
Approved as to form: •
By:
Roy A. Hanley Contractor
City Attorney
Approved as to form:
Rachelle Rickard
Director of Administrative Services
6
Section
3 PROJECT UNDERSTANDING APPROACH
OACH
El Camino Real Arterial System Interconnect
The El Camino Real arterial systems traffic signals are currently not interconnected. OMNI-MEANS will
review the system and determine if the appropriate interconnect system which best suits the Cities needs
and meets current standards for proper operation.
It is not anticipated that the arterial coordination analysis and recommended timing plans will result in any
modification to the existing traffic signal systems, equipment or hardware. Design work to be performed
along El Camino Real generally will include the provision of traffic signal interconnect equipment. It may
be in the cities interest to install an "Opticom"-emergency vehicle pre-emption system as well. A traffic
signal interconnect and, if desired, Opticom plan will be prepared on the base map prepared in Phase 2 at
a scale of 1"=40'. The plan will include El Camino Real from Palomar north through Traffic Way.
The plan will show the location of existing facilities such as utilities, conduits, pull boxes, traffic signal
standards, detection equipment, and the controller cabinets in which the cables are to be connected.
Locations where new conduit and pull boxes are to be placed, where interconnect cable and/or opticom
cable is to be installed will all be depicted on the construction documents.
Construction requirements relative to the installation of these cables and perhaps the Opticom detectors,
will be provided on the plan by note(s), and/or the provision of appropriate design details. The plans and
specifications will also identify the intersections which will require an interconnect program module.
The Coordination/Synchronization of the traffic signals along El Camino Real will e •
g g b accomplished
through the collection of traffic data at each of the major intersections and at other locations where
appropriate. This data will be collected for a minimum of two periods during the day. We believe the
system would be well served if a third "mid-day" period were added to the analysis. -
Travel times and delay information will be gathered through the use of a "floating car" which will travel
the corridor during each time period studied. Specific information will be gathered with respect to
congestion, travel speeds, stop time and delay.
All signal timing parameters will be generated for incorporation into the traffic signal systems.
i
Traffic Signal Interconnect Design&Synchronization Project Page 6
City of Atascadero P2078SCP001.DOC
060
Section
•
4 WORKMAN
TASK 1 -PROJECT SCHEDULE BASE MAPPING/DATA COLLECTION
The first phase of work will be to determine a detailed project schedule,coordination of the City's existing
data base map information,and the gathering of other required data and reports. The tasks associated with
this effort are outlined below:
1.1 Initialization Meeting. OMNI-MEANS will initiate a project kick-off meeting with the City of
Atascadero upon receiving the Notice to Proceed. The purpose of this meeting will be to ensure a
complete understanding of the work plan, to finalize project schedules,to discuss deliverables,and
to obtain all information which is to be provided by the City. Consistent with the City's Request
for Proposal (RFP) dated February 14, 2001, materials to be provided by the City include:
• Underground utility location plans.
• Traffic turning movement counts.
• Topographic maps. -
• Right of Way maps.
• Civil engineering plans for utility, paving and structural changes.
Existing traffic signal plans, intersection timing plans, and plans showing the current traffic signal
interconnection.
• 1.2 Field Review. OMNI-MEANS will also field visit the project area along with City staff to note
any special problems or concerns the same day as the kick-off meeting. We have also budgeted
two additional project meetings. One meeting during the arterial coordination phase and the second
following submittal of the preliminary Plans, Specifications, and Estimates (PS&E).
OMNI-MEANS will verify the information obtained in Task 1.1 with this field review. The field
review will identify evident conflicts, both underground and overhead, which would affect the
proposed work. The intersection will be photo logged to provide easy reference of physical
features during development of the conceptual and design drawings. Field measurements will be
made of roadways, lanes, and sidewalk widths and other features affecting the coordination plans
and/or designs will be identified and located.
1.3 Utility Coordination. Recognizing the importance of early coordination with the appropriate
utility companies, OMNI-MEANS will locate the conceptual design elements, which could affect
these agencies and prepare a transmittal to each, requesting them to identify potential conflicts and
critical issues. Alternatives for the resolution of the conflicts will be examined(alternative designs,
utility relocation, etc.) and coordinated with the applicable utility.
1.4 Prepare Base Maps. Omni-Means will obtain available, recent aerial and planimetric drawings
(both digital and "hard copy" formats.) Using this data we will prepare the necessary base
mapping for the project. Base maps will be prepared for each of the four subject intersections in
1" = 20', 24"06" format.
•
Traffic Signal Interconnect Design&Synchronization Project Page 7
Cityof Atascadero P2078SCP001.D0C
061
TASK 2 -DESIGN CONCEPT REPORT
The Design Concept Report will address both existing and future intersection capacity conditions. Based •
upon current and forecasted intersection turning movement volumes, Omni-Means will analyze peak hour
traffic operations to determine the need for intersection geometric modification.
2.1 Traffic Evaluations.
2.1.1 Data Collection. OMNI-MEANS will prepare two(2)weekday time of day traffic signal
timing plans for the El Camino Real arterial system. The timeperiods include an AM peak
period (typically 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m.), and a PM peak period (typically 4:00 p.m. to
6:00 p.m.). Peak period traffic turning movement counts at the six (6) project
intersections along El Camino Real will be provided. A third, mid-day peak period
(typically 11:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m.), can be included at the option of the City.
Travel speeds through the El Camino Real Corridor will be determined using the "floating
car" method to determine:
• Operating speeds,
• Total delay,
• Stop time, and
• Specific locations and site specific reasons for delay
2.1.2 Perform Intersection Operation Calculation. The current and projected traffic volumes
will be used to perform intersection operation calculations. The calculations will provide
information on the intersection's Level of Service, and necessary left-turn and right-turn
storage lengths. •
2.1.3 Prepare Design Input Traffic Report. The data collection and operational calculations
will be summarized. The report will include all assumptions and will include the
recommended traffic design features to be incorporated into the intersection alternatives.
2.2 Alternative Development.
2.2.1 Intersection Concepts. The Design Input Traffic Report will be reviewed to determine
the feasibility of implementing the intersection lane geometries contained in this report.
Other feasible concepts will be identified and evaluated which meet both current and future
needs.
2.2.2 Cost Estimates. Preliminary cost estimates will be developed for feasible alternatives.
.2.2.3 Alternative Evaluations. If necessary, a matrix of critical elements will be presented
as an aid in comparing sets of alternatives. A recommended alternative will be
identified.
2.3 Design Concept Report. OMNI-MEANS will prepare a Design Concept Report. This report
will address the results of the traffic evaluation and the alternative development, and
evaluation.
Traffic Signal Interconnect Design&Synchronization Project Page 8
City of Atascadero P2078SCP001.D0C
062
The report will include as a minimum:
• 0 Conceptual Traffic Signalization Timing Plan
• Conceptual Roadway Channelization Improvements
• Conceptual Interconnect Plan.
2.4 Design Concept Report Processing. Meetings will be held with the City staff to review the
report and finalize the project design criteria. Design decisions will be made in coordination
with City staff and will conform to current Caltrans and City standards. Both existing and
future needs will be considered.
TASK 3 - EL CAMINO REAL COORDINATION PLANS
3.1 Model Existing Arterial Operations:
OMNI-MEANS will use the traffic count data along with the existing timing plans and
roadway/intersection geometrics to model current arterial operations using TRANSYT-7F
computer software. Land uses along El Camino Real within the project limits include a high
concentration of commercial centers with office uses mixed in. There exists a combination of both
mid-block driveways serving these uses,combined with a number of public road intersections with
El Camino Real not served by traffic signals. OMNI-MEANS will work with the City to identify if
any of these mid-block generators are significantly affecting arterial operations. If critical mid-
block locations are identified, collection of any traffic count data will be the City's responsibility.
3.2 Prepare Recommended Timing Plans:
With the existing arterial operations modeled, phasing alternatives will be tested with
• TRANSYT-7F to determine possible improvements. Recommended timing plans with written
documentation for each of the time periods will be prepared and provided to the City and Caltrans.
For budget purposes, OMNI-MEANS would consider that upon the presentation of the
recommended timing plans to the City, following approval by Caltrans, Phase 3 of this project
would be completed. OMNI-MEANS would be available on a Time and Materials basis to
provide additional technical assistance to the City in implementing the timing plans if necessary.
TASK 4 - PRELivi IINARY PLANS (75 PERCENT COMPLETE).
The following tasks are associated with the preparation of the conceptual plans and are outlined below:
4.1 Preliminary Plans. Traffic signal interconnect plans will reflect the appropriate design
features identified in the Design Concept Report. Plan sheets will be prepared on 24" x 36"
mylar sheets at the appropriate scale for traffic signals and necessary signing/striping design.
The conceptual design plans submittal will include the proposed signal plan, signing and
striping additions, and/or revisions as required.
4.2 Preliminary Plans Review and Comment. Meetings will be held with City staff to review the
conceptual plans. Design decisions will be made in coordination with City staff and will
conform to current City of Atascadero and Caltrans standards.
TASK 5 - FINAL DESIGN
Traffic signal and roadway design and modification will reflect the appropriate design features
identified in the conceptual plans/design concept report.
•
Traffic Signa[Interconnect Design&Synchronization Project Page 9
City of Atascadero P2078SCP001.DOC
063
5.1 90% Plans. Plan sheets will be prepared on 24" x 36" mylar sheets at 1" = 40' scale for
traffic signal interconnect and signing/striping. The plans will include a title sheet, plan
sheet(s) for the intersection (signing and striping, and interconnect plans), and a separate utility
plan sheet.
5.2 Specifications/Bid Document Project Specifications and Bid Documents will be prepared
including the following:
• Notice Inviting Bids
• Invitation to Bidders
• Proposal .
• Contract Agreement
• General Specifications
• Special Provisions
• Appendix
The Project Specifications and Bid Documents will be created by editing the City's standard bid
material. The specifications will be based uon the Caltrans Standard Plans and Specifications
dated 1992. The draft Project Specifications and Bid Documents will be submitted to the-City
for review and comment in hard copy format and in electronic format on a disk, in a format
acceptable to the City.
5.3 Utility Coordination. A set of the preliminary plans will be circulated to the affected agencies
and utilities to secure their comments on the proposed design and assure their concerns
identified in Task 1.4 are resolved.
5.4 Design Review. Four (4) sets of preliminary plans and specifications will be submitted to the
City for review and comment. OMNI-MEANS will meet with City staff to review comments
on the preliminary design, as requested.
TASK 6 -FINAL PS&E
Final plans and specifications will be prepared incorporating comment received during Phase 4 design
review.
6.1 Final Plans, Specifications and Estimates and Bid Documents Following review of the
preliminary plans and specifications and bid documents by the City, final plans, specifications, estimates
and bid documents will be prepared. OMNI-MEANS will provide the City with a reproducible mylar(ink)
set of plans and a ready to print set of specifications. OMNI-MEANS will also provide a copy of
applicable AutoCAD files to the City. The printing and reproduction of plans and specifications for
bidding and construction will be the responsibility of the Client.
TASK 7 - CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
OMNI-MEANS will be available to provide post design construction services related to:
• Responding to pre-bid questions
• Review proposed design changes
• Provide input on the programming of traffic signal controllers.
• Reviewing the successful contractors submittal of P
I equipment s specifications
Because of the difference in time that can occur between the completion of PS&E and the actual award of
the contract, the budget for Task 7 is presented only as an estimate at this time. •
Traffic Signal Interconnect Design&Synchronization Project
Page 10
Ci Atascadero
II� h'o f P2078SCPOOLDOC
064
O •
L`. H 00 00 H 000 n N M OHO O N b b N a b
R �t 00 t'� 7 b b b b M b e� l of O 00 O+ N Q N O
M!. et v N 7 N [� H M M �O 00
H h 69 H H H H H H H h � H H H H H H M
M H
ti
F C 7 N10
N O of h 10 h O^ M Q 00 � O h V Vn
x M
H
OO O O h v OO
O N N V' Oli
tV. bN9 H q 6�9 EP. H b? MH
O ti a
N N N N N O
0
tn
4A ^ 6N9
F
W
U ooc v N
H H
F
v u 10
.G � N N N N V V R 00 In 00 M" 00 N N N 7 N N � �_ fV
00
F W H H
h
O
ea O N N N --• N H ry r1 N yMj h
a H 60%
fO 7
a �
N �D 000
C H H
d
L l WAW
as
6/-YaaAl z
£l 4aaM1.0
;
Z VaAf :-
01 4aaAl
Ell
cl 8-jaaM
C; S'laal4i °
6-YaaM
Z,Valm
l gaaM � 0 3
U N
N c
03 0
O d
�V CIS
O.
E E
V1 C.1 0 N iil C
V 6b U aai ca o a4 0 U � W
_ 0
`a"r Z a a ` U
Hrz E—
..-i • aO3 aFv _ pro a v 3 y
ta. C,CL m oc is aaov;
" l CU M o ` c c �' �' UQ F. c c c is •a' ami An
v o ,�, o o o4Q U Y 'FZa c o a a s °>' En
Chi •G L 0 0 0 c� avi y C 0 0 E v 0 0 0 N vi •� W G •O
O C icf �.' �'.9 O
U U W o 0 o ff U U . W u yrz- c_ c c ca
�o " UU = E HW E ec_o o/C* a, � e`3 o E E EAa, w—
.T.� N O �•N � �C L 6l w Vl V] V 0 wY N•C) •N •6) C O d :5 c c C G
0) Co cd CS O �. O V O ^ O 1.. i` 0 0.5 .� O
C Cl F a .5i7. aaAFA4aaQ � UQAAW � � a. 4aa0. C% V)
O N el N ^ O N el N ^ N r1 r1 tl N 'T N v1 ^ N M et
4 y Y Y N •-• N N N N N N Y r1 r) N Y sf �! Y vl v1 In v1 Y V Y
NNNN N N N
066
ITEM NUMBER: A-6
DATE: 10/23/2001
• Asia ® is a
Atascadero City Council
Staff Report — Police Department
2001 Local Law Enforcement Block Grants Program
RECOMMENDATION:
Council authorize 2001 Local Law Enforcement Block Grant funds be allocated for the purchase
of specialized police equipment.
DISCUSSION:
• The Bureau of Justice Assistance has awarded the City of Atascadero $18,777 under the 2001
Local Law Enforcement Block Grants (LLEBG).program. The purpose of the LLEBG program
is to reduce crime and improve public safety. The funds can be used for procuring equipment,
technology and other material directly related to basic law enforcement functions.
A requirement of the grant is to assemble an advisory board to approve the proposed purchases.
The board conferred on 10/04/01 and was comprised of representatives of the following:
Atascadero Police Department, prosecutor, court system, school system and a local non-profit
community group. The advisory board agreed that specialized police equipment including
simulated firearms training equipment, Field Support Vehicle improvements, radar units and
laptop computer mounts for patrol cars, interview room soundproofing and other investigative
tools, equipment and training for Police Explorers were appropriate uses of the grant funds.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None. (The City's required 10%match of funds will be easily met through the ongoing purchase
of specialized police equipment.)
•
067
ITEM NUMBER: B- 1
DATE: 10/23/2001
�■ a.a a,a �� I
Atascadero City Council
Staff Report- Community Development Department
Zone Change 2001-0016
Conditional Use Permit 2001-0046
Tentative Parcel Map 2001-0019 (AT 01-195)
5725 Portola Road
(Messer / Vaughan Surveys)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommendation:
1. The City Council reject, without prejudice, a 25-foot easement for public road purposes.
• Planning Commission recommendations: Council:
2. Adopt the Draft Resolution certifying proposed Negative Declaration 2001-0028; and,
3. Introduce an Ordinance for first reading to approve Zone Change 2001-0016 amending
the City's Municipal Code to create a new Planned Development 16 Overlay District;
and,
4. Introduce an Ordinance for first reading to approve Zone Change 2001-0016 amending
the City's Official Zoning Map to add a PD 16 overlay district to APN 054-022-033; and,
5. Adopt the Draft Resolution approving the Master Plan of Development for the proposed
PD-16 (CUP 2001-0046) subject to findings and conditions of approval; and,
6. Adopt the Draft Resolution approving Tentative Parcel Map 2001-0019 subject to
findings and conditions of approval.
REPORT IN BRIEF:
ZONE CHANGE 2001-0016 / CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2001-0046 /
iTENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2001-0019 : A proposed Tentative Parcel Map application
with a zoning text and zoning map change to create a new Planned Development Overlay
068
ITEM NUMBER: B- 1
DATE: 10/23/2001
Zone. The project would allow a 2-lot subdivision creating a 1.0-acre lot and a 2.19-acre lot,
permitting the construction of two single-family residences. The purpose of the Planned •
Development Zoning Overlay is to allow the creative clustering of residential parcels to
preserveerve sensitive environmental features and provide open sace easements by allowing lot
sizes smaller than the underlying zone's minimum lot size requirements. The maximum
density on the project site will not exceed the maximum density allowed by the underlying
General Plan designation and Zoning District. The site has a General Plan Designation of
LDSF (Low Density Single-Family) and a zoning district of RSF-Z (Residential Single
Family with a minimum lot size of 1'/2 to 2'/2 acres) The project is proposed on a vacant 3.19-
acre lot at 5725 / 5715 Portola Road, Atascadero, CA 93422, San Luis Obispo County (APN
054-022-033). Owner: Mike Messer, Applicant: Mike Messer.
SITUATION AND FACTS:
1. Applicant: Mike Messer, PO Box 1661, Atascadero, CA 93423
805-466-6001
2. Representative: Vaughan Surveys, 1101 Riverside Avenue, Paso
Robles, CA 93446 805-238-5725
3. Project Address: 5725 Portola Road, Atascadero, CA APN 054-022-033
4. General Plan Designation: Low Density Single Family .
5. Zoning District: RSF-Z (Residential Single Family with a minimum lot
size of 1.5 acres (gross) based on the performance
standards calculation)
6. Site Area: 3.19 Acres (gross)
7. Existing Use: Vacant, building permit in process for a single-family
residence.
8. Environmental Status: Proposed Negative Declaration posted August 2, 2001.
Background: This item was heard by the Planning Commission on September 4, 2001
(minutes are attached). After deliberations, the Planning Commission moved to recommend
the project to the City Council on a 5-0 vote. The following project analysis is based on the
Planning Commission staff report.
DISCUSSION:
Site description: The site is an "L" shaped lot located on Portola Road north of the •
intersection of Portola Road and Santa Lucia Road. The lot does not have frontage on
069
ITEM NUMBER: B- 1
DATE: 10/23/2001
• Portola Road and is accessed by a private easement, locally referred to as Allemende Lane.
The portion of the lot nearest the easement frontage is flat and the rear portion of the lot is
mostly sloping hillside.
Previous Subdivision Applications: Staff and the Planning Commission have reviewed
several subdivision applications in the last few years that have resulted in irregular parcel
configurations. The subdivision applications have met the lot size requirements of the
underlying General Plan and zoning districts. However, in order to meet the minimum parcel
size requirements, projects have been forced into lot designs with steep building sites,
difficult access, driveway designs with excessive grading and tree removals, and irregular
shaped lot configurations. In order to address this problem and provide for development that
would protect the natural features of a site, staff is recommending the Planning Commission
consider adopting a new Planned Development Overlay District that would allow clustering
of residential development within the single-family zoning districts.
Proposed Zoning Map Amendment: The project proposed for the new planned
development standard is a parcel located at 5725 Portola Road. The applicant originally
applied for a two-lot subdivision on the subject property. Staff reviewed the application and
was concerned with the irregular lot configurations. Staff and the applicant worked together
to create an alternative project description that could accommodate the subdivision of the
property and still meet the goals of the General Plan.
sed Open
a e Easement
Irregularly Shaped
Lots
Originally Proposed Subdivision Design: Revised Subdivision Design:
Lots equal in size to meet zoning district Cluster lots of 2.19 and 1.0 acres
Minimum lot size requirements More uniform lot configuration
•
070
ITEM NUMBER: B- 1
DATE: 10/23/2001
y, •
9 �F
i
U
Approximate location of building sites Hillside area in the distance will be protected with an
open-space easement
Zoning Text Change:
Planned Development Purpose: The Atascadero Municipal Code states that the purpose of
the Planned Development Overlay Zone is to identify areas where development standards
may differ from those established by the underlying zoning district. The deviations from the
zoning standards are deemed necessary to promote orderly and harmonious development and
to enhance the opportunity to best utilize special characteristics of an area.
The proposed planned development will be re-usable, similar to the Planned Development
Overlay 7 that is used for multi-family residential developments. The new planned
development will be able to be used on future subdivision applications within the Residential
Suburban, Residential Single Family and Limited Single Family zoning districts. The
proposed planned development will allow lot sizes that are smaller than what is allowed in
the underlying zoning district, however the overall density of the site will be required to be
consistent with the parcels' General Plan designation. The planned development would set
the minimum lot size at .5 acre (net) for lots served by City sewer and 1.0 acre (gross) for lots
that will be served by on-site septic systems.
The proposed planned development will give staff and the applicants creative ways to
approach subdivision design. This will allow the location of building sites, in appropriate
areas and will not "force" building sites and driveways onto steep hillsides just to meet the
minimum lot size requirements. Additionally, the proposed planned development will
provide a benefit to the surrounding properties, because a requirement of the proposed
planned development is that each project will provide an open space or tree preservation
easement. This will ensure that the rural character of the sites will be maintained.
Draft Planned Development Text:
Staff is recommending the following text be adopted as PD-16. The planned development
would be applicable in the RS, RSF, LSF Zoning Districts:
071
ITEM NUMBER: B- 1
DATE: 10/23/2001
• (a) Purpose. The purpose of the district is to allow the creative clustering of residential
parcels to preserve sensitive environmental features and provide open space by allowing lot
sizes smaller than the underlying zone's minimum lot size requirements in the RS, RSF, LSF
Zoning Districts.
(b) Development Standards:
(1) The maximum density shall not exceed that allowed by the underlying zoning district and
General Plan designation. Individual lot sizes may be smaller provided the overall project
density conforms to the specified maximum density.
(i) Minimum individual lot sizes shall be at least one acre (gross)for parcels served by on-
site septic systems and 0.5 acre (net)for lots served by the City's sewer system.
(2) Lots shall utilize common access when feasible.
(3) Open space easements shall be provided for each project. All open space easements shall
be designated as non-build, non-storage areas on the Final Parcel / Tract Maps. (Septic
systems are allowed to be located within the open space easements.
(4) All building sites within the Planned Development shall be located on slopes under 20
percent.
(5) Development on each parcel shall be designed to avoid native tree impacts, preserve the
contours of the hills, protect prominent view sheds, maintain wildlife corridors and minimize
impacts to significant drainage areas and blue-line creeks.
(6)A Master Plan of Development shall be approved in conjunction with any Tentative Tract
/Parcel Map application. All subdivision improvements and subsequent development shall
be consistent with the Master Plan of Development. The Master Plan of Development shall
• contain the following:
(i) A site plan indicating land use, open space, circulation, lot sizes, slopes, native trees,
building sites and common landscape features;
(ii)A statistical summary of the project's land uses and densities;
(iii)A statement of project features that will provide a public benefit;
(iv)Any special development standards that will be required of future development;
(v) Individual building plans and elevations are not required.
Master Plan of Development Statistical Summary: The Tentative Parcel Map prepared for
the project is the Master Plan of Development for the site.
Parcel A Parcel B
Parcel Size(Gross)
(1.0 acre required) 1.00 Acre 2.19 Acres
%Building Envelope
(not to exceed 20%) 9.56% 7.55%
Open Space Area 0 .99 Acres
Maximum Density Allowed: One SFR per 1.5 acres
Total Site Area: 3.19 Acres
•
072
ITEM NUMBER: B- 1
DATE: 10/23/2001
Subdivision History: •
The existing parcel was created by the approval of a plat map by the County Board of
Supervisors in 1961. A condition of the original subdivision was that the property owner was
required to offer a 25-foot easement for public use along the entire property frontage. It is
unclear whether or not the offer was accepted by the County Board of Supervisors.
Therefore, the applicant is offering the 25-foot public easement as required by the original
plat map. City policy has been to reject all offers of dedication for public street purposes.
The recommended motion to approve the project includes a rejection of the 25-foot offer of
dedication for road purposes.
Subdivision Design:
The subdivision divides one existing lot into two parcels. Both lots will have access from an
existing 25-foot public easement that is contiguous to an existing 20-foot private easement.
Both lots have building envelopes under 20 percent and percolation tests have been provided
for the lots that indicate that the soil is suitable for an on-site septic system (40 minutes/inch).
Atascadero Mutual Water Company will provide water to the new residences, and future
utilities to the new lot will be required to be placed underground. The area designated on the
tentative parcel map as a"Hillside Preservation Easement" will be recorded as an open space
easement on the Final Parcel Map. Future uses of the area under the open space easement
will be limited, and future construction within the easement area will be prohibited.
Access:
An existing 20-foot easement lies on ✓ ' _� _ 3'
the north side of the property.
An additional 25-foot easement is ZI
provided inside the frontage of the ] l 1
subject parcel.
T
i `
---------------=----------------L--'------------------�
The subdivision is consistent with the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. The General
Plan and zoning maps designate the property at 5725 Portola Road for "Single Family
Residential" uses. The subdivision is consistent with the proposed planned development
standards. The minimum lot size calculations require at least 1.5 acre per residence. The site
has an overall density of one house per 1.59 acres which is within the 1.5 acres required by •
the minimum lot size standards. The density is consistent with the Low Density Single
073
ITEM NUMBER: B- 1
DATE: 10/23/2001
• Family General Plan designation. The parcel map is conditioned that the zone changes must
be in place prior to the tentative map approval becoming active.
Public Improvements:
The City Engineer has inspected the existing improvements in the public right-of-way and
found them to be adequate.
Environmental Review:
The Initial Study concluded that there would be no significant harm to the environment as a
result of this subdivision, when mitigation measures are implemented. A proposed Negative
Declaration has been prepared for the project and will be certified with the adoption of the
draft resolution of approval.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The project would likely have a slight negative impact on City revenues. As a general rule,
single-family dwellings require services that exceed the revenue generated by the dwelling.
•
CONCLUSIONS:
The proposed cluster planned development text will provide a flexible option for subdivision
design that will minimize development impacts. The subdivision will be consistent with the
General Plan and Zoning Ordinance once the proposed planned development overlay is
approved. The parcel configurations are consistent with the Subdivision Ordinance
requirements, and the size and shape of the proposed lots are consistent with the character of
the immediate neighborhood. If approved, the project would allow for the construction of
one additional single-family residence. The map and zone change should be approved as
conditioned.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. The City Council may approve the project subject to additional or revised project
conditions. The Council's motion to approve needs to include any new or revised project
conditions.
• 2. The Council may deny the project. The parcel would retain its designation of Residential
Single Family.
074
ITEM NUMBER: B- 1
DATE: 10/23/2001
3. The Council may continue the hearing and refer the item back to staff for additional .
information or analysis. Direction should be given to staff and the applicant on required
information.
4. The City Council may accept the 25-foot offer of dedication for public street purposes.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 -- Location Map (General Plan & Zoning)
Attachment 2 -- Planning Commission Minutes (9/4/01)
Attachment 3 -- Minimum Lot Size Calculation
Attachment 4 -- Draft Resolution(Proposed Environmental Determination)
Attachment 5 -- Draft Ordinance (Proposed Text Amendment)
Attachment 6 -- Draft Ordinance (Proposed Map Change)
Attachment 7 -- Draft Resolution (Proposed Master Plan of Development)
Attachment 8 -- Draft Resolution (Proposed Tentative Parcel Map)
075
ITEM NUMBER: B- 1
DATE: 10/23/2001
• ATTACHMENT 1: Location Map(General Plan/Zoning)
Zone Change 2001-0016/Conditional Use Permit 2001-0046,
TPM 2001-0019
5725 Portola Road
Project Site: 5725 Portola Road
GP: Low Density Single Family
Zoning: RSF-Z
LOCATION MAP
V
vJ
i
�N;.,.x ,
s
•
676
ITEM NUMBER: B- 1
DATE: 10/23/2001
ATTACHMENT 2: Planning Commission Minutes
Zone Change 2001-0016/Conditional Use Permit 2001-0046,
TPM 2001-0019
5725 Portola Road
PUBLIC HEARINGS
ZONE CHANGE 2001-0016 / CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2001-0046 /
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2001-0019: A proposed Tentative Parcel Map application
with a zoning text and zoning map change to create a new Planned Development Overlay
Zone. The project would allow a 2-lot subdivision creating a 1.0 acre lot and a 2.19 acre lot,
permitting the construction of two single-family residences. The purpose of the Planned
Development Zoning Overlay is to allow the creative clustering of residential parcels to
preserve sensitive environmental features and provide open space easements by allowing lot
sizes smaller than the underlying zone's minimum lot size requirements. The maximum
density on the project site will not exceed the maximum density allowed by the underlying
General Plan designation and Zoning District. The site has a General Plan Designation of
LDSF (Low Density Single-Family) and a Zoning District of RSF-Z (Residential Single
Family with a minimum lot size of 1'/z to 21/2 acres). The project is proposed on a vacant 3.19
acre lot at 5725 / 5715 Portola Road, Atascadero, CA 93422, San Luis Obispo County (APN
054-022-033). Owner: Mike Messer, Applicant: Mike Messer.
PROPOSED NEGATIVE DECLARATION 2001-0028: The Community Development
Department recommends that the Planning Commission find that no significant harm would
come to the environment from approval of this Tentative Parcel Map and Zone Change. The
proposed Negative Declaration is available for public review through September 4, 2001 at
6500 Palma Avenue, Community Development Department, Room 104, from 8:00 a.m. to
5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Staff Recommends:
1. The Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. PC 2001-043, recommending
the City Council certify proposed Negative Declaration 2001-0027 prepared for
Zone Change 2001-0016 and Tentative Parcel Map 2001-0019; and,
2. The Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. PC 2001-044 recommending
that the City Council introduce an ordinance for first reading to approve Zone
Change 2001-0016; amending the City's Zoning Ordinance to create a new
Planned Development 16 Overlay District; and,
3. The Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. PC 2001-045 recommending
that the City Council introduce an ordinance for first reading to approve Zone
Change 2001-0016; and amend the City's Zoning Map to add a PD 16 overlay
district with a Master Plan of Development (CUP 2001-0046) for the project
site; and, •
077
ITEM NUMBER: B- 1
DATE: 10/23/2001
• 4. The Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. PC 2001-046 recommending the
City Council approve Tentative Parcel Map 2001-0019, a request to subdivide a
3.19 acre lot into two parcels; 1.0 acre and 2.19 acres each, based on findings
and subject to conditions.
Associate Planner Jamie Kirk provided the staff report and answered questions of the
Commission.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Mike Messer, 3745 Monterey Road, applicant, answered questions of the Commission.
Commissioner Fonzi inquired if the Mr. Messer had met with owners of the surrounding
properties to determine if he could utilize the access on Allemonde Lane. Mr. Messer stated
that it is his intention to work with those property owners.
Commissioner Kelley asked about the pine trees on the site. Mr. Messer stated that they are
located within two feet of the easement line and that it should be possible to save most of
them when paving the driveway.
Commissioner Blaser questioned whether it would be possible to reconfigure the dividing
property line closer to the hill to create a parcel of 1 '/z acres thereby conforming to the
existing zoning requirements. Mr. Messer indicated that this would place the building pad
under the power lines or further up on the hill.
Richard Mullen, 4200 Portola Road, questioned how amending the zoning ordinance to allow
this type of lot split would effect owners of properties that are less than three acres in size.
Mr. Frace stated that this Planned Development is to apply to lots that could be subdivided
under the existing General Plan. Regarding lots that are slightly smaller than three acres and
do not have that privilege, Mr. Frace stated that the City Council is currently looking at this
issue under the new General Plan Update.
Joan O'Keefe, 9985 Old Morro Road East, stated her concerns about placing septic systems
in open space areas and the eventual negative impact this has on trees.
Chairman Eddings closed the Public Comment period.
Commissioner Kelley stated that he feels that this is the beginning of providing staff with a
tool to create better lot splits in the future. He also stated his hope that by creating the one-
acre lot the City Council would be encouraged to go along with some of the
recommendations the Commission has made.
Chairman Eddings agreed with Commissioner Kelley's comments and felt that there should
be flexibility for those whose lots are just under the standard.
•
U078
ITEM NUMBER: B- 1
DATE: 10/23/2001
Commissioner Fonzi supported the concept and particularly the idea of preserving the •
sensitive hillside areas. Regarding item number (5) on page 31 of the staff report,
Commissioner Fonzi felt that the words "minimizing grading" should be included.
Commissioner Kelley stated that he preferred leaving the flexibility of the current wording of
item number 5. He felt that at times grading could be more beneficial than building a home
that protrudes significantly on a hillside.
Commissioner Fonzi referred the Commission to page 31, item number (6) (i), and suggested
the word"common" be omitted from the wording.
MOTION: By Commissioner Bentz and seconded by Commissioner Fonzi to approve
staff recommendations 1, 2, 3 and 4 with the following change to the Proposed
Planned Development 16 Overlay District: Code Text Amendment Chapter 9-
3.660 Atascadero Municipal Code:
Page 31, Item No. (6) (i): A site plan indicating land use, eammen
open space, circulation, lot sizes, slopes, native trees, building sites
and common landscape features;
AYES: Commissioners Bentz, Fonzi, Blaser, Kelley and Chairman Eddings
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None •
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote.
•
979
ITEM NUMBER: B- 1
DATE: 10/23/2001
ATTACHMENT 3: Minimum Lot Size Calculations
Zone Change 2001-0016/Conditional Use Permit 2001-0046,
TPM 2001-0019
5725 Portola Road
Minimum Lot Size Criteria For the Residential Single Family Zone
Address 5725 Portola Road
APN 054-022-033
Lot Size 3.19 Acres
Contact Mike Messer Lot Size Factors
Distance from Center of 0-4,000=.08, 4-6,000=.10
Community 6-8,000=.12 4-6,000 0.1
>20 min/inch=.30
Septic Suitability(perk 20-59 min/inch=.50
rate) >60 min/inch=.70 40 minutes/in 0.5
• 0-20%=.3, 21-30%=.50,
Average Slope 31%and over=.70 18% 0.3
City accepted road=.15 Paved
road less than 15%=.15 Paved
road more than 15%=.20 All
weather less than 15%=.25
All weather more than 15%=3 0
Access Condition Unimproved surface=.40 0.15
Average Lot Size Within
1500 Feet(acres) 0.98 0.20
Minimum
Lot Size= 1.246
Minimum lot size shall be at least 1.50 acres in the RSF-Z District
Of•
ITEM NUMBER: B- 1
DATE: 10/23/2001
ATTACHMENT 4: Draft Resolution is
Environmental Determination
Zone Change 2001-0016/Conditional Use Permit 2001-0046rrPM 2001-0019
5725 Portola Road
DRAFT
RESOLUTION
A RESOLUTION OF THE ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL
CERTIFYING NEGATIVE DECLARATION 2001-0028 PREPARED FOR ZONE
CHANGE 2001-0016 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2001-0046,AND TENTATIVE
PARCEL MAP 2001-0019
(5725 Portola Road/APN 054-022-033 /Mike Messer)
WHEREAS, an application has been received from Mike Messer (PO Box 1661,
Atascadero, CA 93423) Applicant and Property Owner, to consider a project consisting of an
amendment to the City's Zoning Text to create a new Planned Development Overlay District
(PD 16), a zone change from RSF-Z (Residential Single Family—minimum lot size 1 `/2 to 2
`/2 acres) to RSF-Z / PD-16 (Residential Single Family— minimum lot size 1 `/2 to 2 `/2 acres
with Planned Development Overlay 16), the adoption of a Master Plan of Development, and
a two-lot residential Tentative Parcel Map on APN 054-022-033; and,
WHEREAS, an Initial Study and Draft Negative Declaration 2001-0028 were
prepared for the project and made available for public review in accordance with the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero held a public
hearing on September 4, 2001 following the required 20-day review period for the Initial
Study and Draft Negative Declaration to consider their adequacy; and,
WHEREAS, the Atascadero City Council held a public hearing following the close
of the review period for the Initial Study and Draft Negative Declaration to consider the
proposed environmental determination and Planning Commission recommendation; and,
NOW, THEREFORE, the Atascadero City Council, at a public hearing held on
Tuesday, October 23, 2001, hereby resolves to certify Proposed Negative Declaration 2001-
0028 based on the following Findings and as shown on Exhibit A:
(a) The Negative Declaration has been completed in compliance with CEQA; and,
(b) The Negative Declaration was presented to the Planning Commission, and the
information contained therein was considered by the Planning Commission, prior to •
recommending action on the project for which it was prepared; and,
ITEM NUMBER: B- 1
DATE: 10/23/2001
(c) The project does not have the potential to create a significant environmental impact;
and,
(d) The project will not achieve short-term to the disadvantage of long term
environmental goals; and,
(e) The project does not have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable; and,
i
(f) The project will not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings either directly
or indirectly.
On motion by Council Member and seconded by Council Member
the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
• ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ADOPTED:
F
By:
Mike Arrambide, Mayor
Attest:
Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk
Approved as to form:
Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney
is
082
ITEM NUMBER: B- 1
DATE: 10/23/2001
Exhibit A: Proposed Negative Declaration •
ZCH 2001-0016/CUP 2001-0046/TPM 2001-0019
N
i918 _ R, 1978
CAD j PROPOSED
NEGATIVE DECLARATION#2001-0028
6500 Palma Avenue Atascadero, CA 93422 805/461-5035
APPLICANT: Mike Messer
PO Box 1661
Atascadero, CA 93423
PROJECT TITLE: Tentative Parcel Map 2001-0019, Zone Change 2001-0016
PROJECT LOCATION: 5725 15715 Portola Road,Atascadero, CA 93422, San Luis Obispo
County,APN 054-022-033
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A proposed Tentative Parcel Map application and a zoning text and
zoning map change to create a new Planned Development Overlay Zone. The project would allow a •
2-lot subdivision permitting the construction of two single-family residences. The purpose of the
Planned Development Zoning Overlay is to allow the creative clustering of residential parcels to
preserve sensitive environmental features and provide open space easements by allowing lot sizes
smaller than the underlying zone's minimum lot size requirements. The maximum density on the
project site shall not exceed the density allowed in the underlying General Plan designation and
zoning district. The site has a General Plan Designation of LDSF(Low Density Single-Family) and a
Zoning District of RSF-Z(Residential Single Family with a minimum lot size of 1%2 to 2%2 acres) The
project is proposed on a vacant 3.19 acre lot at 5725/5715 Portola Road, Atascadero, CA 93422,
San Luis Obispo County(APN 054-022-033).
FINDINGS:
1. The project does not have the potential to degrade the environment.
2. The project will not achieve short-term to the disadvantage of long-term environmental
goals.
3. The project does not have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable.
4. The project will not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings either directly or
indirectly.
•
083
ITEM NUMBER: B- 1
DATE: 10/23/2001
•
DETERMINATION:
Based on the above findings, and the information contained in the Initial Study 2001-0028 (made a
part hereof by reference and on file in the Community Development Department), it has been
determined that the above project will not have an adverse significant impact on the environment
when the following project is developed in accordance with required conditions.
PREPARED BY: Jamie L. Kirk,Associate Planner
DATE POSTED: 8/2/01
PUBLIC REVIEW ENDS:
•
084
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 10/23/2001
Attachment 5: Draft Ordinance •
Zone Text Change
Zone Change 2001-0016
5725 Portola Road
DRAFT
I
ORDINANCE
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ATASCADERO AUTHORIZING
ZONE CHANGE 2001-0016 THEREBY AMENDING THE CITY'S ZONING
ORDINANCE (CHAPTER 9, ATASCADERO MUNICPAL CODE) TO INCLUDE
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 16 OVERLAY
DISTRICT (PD 16)
(5725 Portola Road/APN 054-022-033 /Mike Messer)
WHEREAS, an application has been received from Mike Messer (PO Box 1661,
Atascadero, CA 93423) Applicant and Property Owner, to consider a project consisting of an
amendment to the City's Zoning Text to create a new Planned Development Overlay District
(PD 16), a zone change from RSF-Z (Residential Single Family—minimum lot size 1 1/2 to 2
1/2 acres) to RSF-Z / PD-16 (Residential Single Family— minimum lot size 1 1/2 to 2 1/2 acres ,
with Planned Development Overlay 16), the adoption of a Master Plan of Development, and
a two-lot residential Tentative Parcel Map on APN 054-022-033; and, •
WHEREAS, the site's General Plan Designation is LDSF (Low Density Single-
Family; and,
WHEREAS, the site's current zoning district is RSF-Z (Residential Single Family;
with a minimum lot size of 1 1/2 to 2 1/2 acres); and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City
to enact this amendment to Chapter 9-3.660 of the Atascadero Municipal Code to protect the
health, safety and welfare of its citizens by applying orderly development of the City; and,
WHEREAS, the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and public notice of
environmental documents, as set forth in the State and local guidelines for implementation of
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) have been adhered to; and,
WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed Public Hearing upon the subject zone
change application was held by the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero at which
hearing evidence, oral and documentary, was admitted on behalf of said zoning amendments;
and,
is
085
ITEM NUMBER: B- 1
DATE: 10/23/2001
• WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, at a public hearing
held on September 4, 2001, studied and considered Zone Change 2001-0016 after first
studying and considering the Draft Negative Declaration prepared for the project; and,
WHEREAS, the Atascadero City Council, at a duly noticed public hearing held on
Tuesday, October 23, 2001, considered Zone Change 2001-0016, after first studying and
considering the Proposed Negative Declaration prepared for the project.
NOW, THEREFORE,the City Council does hereby ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. Findings for Approval of a Zone Change Creating a PD-16
Planned Development Overlay District. The City Council finds as follows:
a) Modification of development standards or processing requirements is warranted to
promote orderly and harmonious development.
b) Modification of development standards or processing requirements will enhance
the opportunity to best utilize special characteristics of an area and will have a
beneficial effect on the area.
c) Benefits derived from the overlay zone cannot be reasonably achieved through
existing development standards or processing requirements.
• d) Proposed plans offer certain redeeming features to compensate for the requested
modification.
SECTION 3. Approval. The City Council of the City of Atascadero, in a regular
session assembled on October 23, 2001 resolved to introduce for first reading an ordinance
that would add a new code section to Chapter 9-3.660 of the Atascadero Municipal Code as
follows:
a) Exhibit A: Proposed Zoning Text
SECTION 3. Effective Date.
This ordinance shall be effective a 12:01 a.m. on the 31s' day after its final
passage.
• �I
086
,I
ITEM NUMBER: B- 1
DATE: 10/23/2001
On motion by Council Member and seconded by Council Member •
the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ADOPTED:
By:
Mike Arrambide, Mayor
Attest:
Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk
Approved as to form:
Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney
087
ITEM NUMBER: B- 1
DATE: 10/23/2001
• Exhibit A: Proposed Zoning Text
ZCH 2001-0016
Proposed Planned Development 16 Overlay District: Code Text Amendment Chapter
9-3.660 Atascadero Municipal Code
(a) Purpose. The purpose of the district is to allow the creative clustering of residential
parcels to preserve sensitive environmental features and provide open space by allowing lot
sizes smaller than the underlying zone's minimum lot size requirements in the RS, RSF, LSF
Zoning Districts.
(b) Development Standards:
(1) The maximum density shall not exceed that allowed by the underlying zoning district and
General Plan designation. Individual lot sizes may be smaller provided the overall project
density conforms to the specified maximum density.
(i) Minimum individual lot sizes shall be at least one acre (gross) for parcels served by on-
site septic systems and 0.5 acre (net) for lots served by the City's sewer system.
(2) Lots shall utilize common access when feasible.
(3) Open space easements shall be provided for each project. All open space easements shall
be designated as non-build, non-storage areas on the Final Parcel / Tract Maps. (Septic
• systems are allowed to be located within the open space easements.
(4) All building sites within the Planned Development shall be located on slopes under 20
percent.
(5) Development on each parcel shall be designed to avoid native tree impacts, preserve the
contours of the hills, protect prominent view sheds, maintain wildlife corridors and minimize
impacts to significant drainage areas and blue-line creeks.
(6) A Master Plan of Development shall be approved in conjunction with any Tentative Tract
/ Parcel Map application. All subdivision improvements and subsequent development shall
be consistent with the Master Plan of Development. The Master Plan of Development shall
contain the following:
(i) A site plan indicating land use, open space, circulation, lot sizes, slopes, native trees,
building sites and common landscape features;
(ii) A statistical summary of the project's land uses and densities;
(iii) A statement of project features that will provide a public benefit;
(iv) Any special development standards that will be required of future development;
(v) Individual building plans and elevations are not required.
•
ITEM NUMBER: B- 1
DATE: 10/23/2001
Attachment 6: Draft Ordinance •
Zoning Map Change
ZCH 2001-0016/CUP 2001-0046
5725 Portola Road
DRAFT
ORDINANCE
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ATASCADERO AUTHORIZING
ZONE CHANGE 2000-0016 AMENDING THE ZONING MAP DISTRICT OF APN
054-022-033 FROM RSF-Z (RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY—Z) TO RSF-Z/PD-16
(RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY WITH A PD-16 OVERLAY DISTRICT)
SUBJECT TO A MASTER PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT
(5725 Portola Road/APN 054-022-033 /Mike Messer)
WHEREAS, an application has been received from Mike Messer (PO Box 1661,
Atascadero, CA 93423) Applicant and Property Owner, to consider a project consisting of an
amendment to the City's Zoning Text to create a new Planned Development Overlay District
(PD 16), a zone change from RSF-Z (Residential Single Family—minimum lot size 1 1/2 to 2
1/2 acres) to RSF-Z /PD-16 (Residential Single Family- minimum lot size 1 1/2 to 2V2 acres O
with Planned Development Overlay 16), the adoption of a Master Plan of Development, and
a two-lot residential Tentative Parcel Map on APN 054-022-033; and,
WHEREAS, the site's General Plan Designation is LDSF (Low Density Single-
Family; and,
WHEREAS,the site's current zoning district is RSF-Z (Residential Single Family;
with a minimum lot size of 1 1/2 to 2 I/2 acres); and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City
to enact this amendment to the Zoning Map to protect the health, safety and welfare of its
citizens by applying orderly development of the City; and,
WHEREAS, the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and public notice of
environmental documents, as set forth in the State and local guidelines for implementation of
the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) have been adhered to; and,
WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed public hearing upon the subject zone
change application was held by the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero at which
hearing evidence, oral and documentary, was admitted on behalf of said zoning amendments;
and, •
089
ITEM NUMBER: B- 1
DATE: 10/23/2001
. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, at a public hearing
held on September 4, 2001, studied and considered Zone Change 2001-0016, after first
studying and considering the Draft Negative Declaration prepared for the project; and,
WHEREAS, the Atascadero City Council, at a duly noticed public hearing held on
Tuesday, October 23, 2001, considered Zone Change 2001-0016, after first studying and
considering the Proposed Negative Declaration prepared for the project,
NOW, THEREFORE,the City Council does hereby ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. Findings for Approval of a Zone Change Creating a PD-16
Planned Development Overlay District. The City Council finds as follows:
e) Modification of development standards or processing requirements is warranted to
promote orderly and harmonious development.
f) Modification of development standards or processing requirements will enhance
the opportunity to best utilize special characteristics of an area and will have a
beneficial effect on the area.
g) Benefits derived from the overlay zone cannot be reasonably achieved through
existing development standards or processing requirements.
h) Proposed plans offer certain redeeming features to compensate for the requested
modification.
SECTION 2. Approval. The City Council of the City of Atascadero, in a regular
session assembled on October 23, 2001 resolved to introduce for first reading an ordinance
that would rezone the subject site consistent with the following:
b) Exhibit A: Zone Change Map
SECTION 3. Effective Date.
This ordinance shall be effective at 12:01 a.m. on the 31" day after its final
passage.
On motion by Council Member and seconded by Council Member
• the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted following roll call vote:
090
ITEM NUMBER: B- 1
DATE: 10/23/2001
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ADOPTED:
By:
Mike Arrambide, Mayor
Attest:
Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk
Approved as to form: •
Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney
091
ITEM NUMBER: B- 1
DATE: 10/23/2001
• Exhibit A: Proposed Zoning Map
ZCH 2001-0016/CUP 2001-0046/TPM 2001-0019
Project Site: 5725 Portola Road
APN 0554-022-033
Existing Zoning: RSF-Z
Proposed Zoning: RSF-Z(PD16)
Proiect Site
f
` 3f
3�
•
092
ITEM NUMBER: B- 1
DATE: 10/23/2001
r
Attachment 7: Draft Resolution
Master Plan of Development
ZCH 2001-0016/CUP 2001-0046
5725 Portola Road
DRAFT
RESOLUTION
A RESOLUTION OF THE ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL
APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2001-0046,A MASTER PLAN OF
DEVELOPMENT FOR ZONE CHANGE 2001-0016 ON APN 054-022-033
(5725 Portola Road/APN 054-022-033 /Mike Messer)
WHEREAS, an application has been received from Mike Messer (PO Box 1661,
Atascadero, CA 93423) Applicant and Property Owner, to consider a project consisting of an
amendment to the City's Zoning Text to create a new Planned Development Overlay District
(PD 16), a zone change from RSF-Z (Residential Single Family—minimum lot size 1 1/2 to 2
1/2 acres) to RSF-Z / PD-16 (Residential Single Family— minimum lot size 1 1/2 to 2 1/2 acres
with Planned Development Overlay 16), the adoption of a Master Plan of Development, and
a two-lot residential Tentative Parcel Map on APN 054-022-033; and,
WHEREAS, the site's General Plan Designation is LDSF (Low Density Single- •
Family; and,
WHEREAS, the site's current zoning district is RSF-Z (Residential Single Family;
with a minimum lot size of 1 1/2 to 2 %2 acres); and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended that a site be rezoned to
include a PD-16 overlay district which requires the adoption of a Master Plan of
Development; and,
WHEREAS, the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and public notice of
environmental documents, as set forth in the State and local guidelines for implementation of
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) have been adhered to; and,
WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed public hearing upon the subject zone
change application was held by the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero at which
hearing evidence, oral and documentary, was admitted on behalf of said Master Plan of
Development; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, at a public hearing
held on September 4, 2001, studied and considered the Master Plan of Development for Zone
Chance 2001-0016, after first studying and considering the Draft Negative Declaration •
prepared for the project; and,
093
ITEM NUMBER: B- 1
DATE: 10/23/2001
•
WHEREAS, the Atascadero City Council, at a duly noticed public hearing held on
October 23, 2001, studied and considered the Master Plan of Development (CUP 2001-
0046), after first studying and considering the Proposed Negative Declaration prepared for
the project.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council takes the following actions:
SECTION 1. Findings for Approval for Amendment of the Master Plan of
Development. The City Council finds as follows:
1. The proposed project or use is consistent with the General Plan and the City's
Appearance Review Manual; and,
2. The proposed project or use satisfies all applicable provisions of the Title
(Zoning Ordinance) including the PD-7 Ordinance; and,
3. The establishment, and subsequent operation or conduct of the use will not,
because of the circumstances and conditions applied in the particular case, be
detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of the general public or persons
residing or working in the neighborhood of the use, or be detrimental or
injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity of the use; and,
4. That the proposed project or use will not be inconsistent with the character of
• the immediate neighborhood or contrary to its orderly development; and,
5. That the proposed use or project will not generate a volume of traffic beyond
the safe capacity of all roads providing access to the project, either existing or
to be improved in conjunction with the project, or beyond the normal traffic
volume of the surrounding neighborhood that would result from full
development in accordance with the Land Use Element.
SECTION 2. Approval. The Atascadero City Council, in a regular session
assembled on October 23, 2001 resolved to approve the amendment of the Master Plan of
Development (CUP 2000-0046) subject to the following:
1. Exhibit A: Conditions of Approval
2. Exhibit B: Site Plan
3. Exhibit C: Statistical Summary
•
094
ITEM NUMBER: B- 1
DATE: 10/23/2001
On motion b Council Member and seconded b Council Member •
Y � Y
the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ADOPTED:
By:
Mike Arrambide, Mayor
Attest:
•
Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk
Approved as to form:
Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney
095
ITEM NUMBER: B- 1
DATE: 10/23/2001
• Exhibit A: Conditions of Approval
ZCH 2001-0016/CUP 2001-0046
Conditions of Approval Timing Responsibility
CUP 2001-0046 !Monitoring
PS:Planning Services
BL:Business License BS:Building Services
GP:Grading Permit FD:Fire Department
BP:Building Permit PD:Police Department
FI:Final Inspecfion CE:City Engineer
TO:Temporary Occupancy WW:Wastewater
FO:Final Occupancy CA City Attorney
Planning Services
1. The approval of this use permit shall become final and PS
effective following the end of the referendum period for
Zone Change 2001-0016.
2. Approval of this Master Plan of Development shall be valid BP PS
concurrently with the life of Tentative Parcel Map 2001-
0019 and then indefinitely following final map. The Master
Plan of Development approval shall expire and become null
and void unless a final map is recorded consistent with the
Master Plan of Development.
3. The Community Development Department shall have the BP/FM PS
authority to approve minor changes to the project that(1)
increase the intensity of the project by less than 10%, (2)
result in a superior site design or appearance,and/or(3)
address a construction design issue that is not substantive
to the Master Plan of Development. The Planning
Commission shall have the final authority to approve any
other changes to the Master Plan of Development and any
associated Tentative Maps.
4. All subsequent Tentative Parcel Maps and construction BP/FM PS
permits shall be consistent with the Master Plan of
Development contained herein.
5. Future construction on the lots shall be consistent with the BP/FM PS
Master Plan of Development(CUP 2001-0046)approved
for the site.
6. The Hillside Preservation Easement shall be designated as FM PS
an Open Space Easement and recorded on the Final
Parcel Map.
•
09b
ITEM NUMBER: B— I
DATE: 10/23/2001
Exhibit B: Master Plan of Development •
ZCH 2001-0016/CUP 2001-0046/TPM 2001-0019
is
Y � 6 ■
i �9j( g
I
bl
Gg
t'
F I'
ley
epyy1 yy f !
I -......._ .. - a d <
. tern: 1
-----� --------- -- --- ---------------~---�
f N ,
--------------- —=�- ------'---'-----------------
...... t t •
t
097
ITEM NUMBER: B- 1
DATE: 10/23/2001
• Exhibit C: Statistical Summary
ZCH 2001-0016/CUP 2001-0046/TPM 2001-0019
.,'Parcel A Parcel B
Parcel Size(Gross)
(1.0 acre required) 1.00 Acre 2.19 Acres
%Building Envelope
(not to exceed 20%) 9.56% 7.55%
Open Space Area 0 0.99 Acres
Maximum Density Allowed: One SFR per 1.5 acres
Total Site Area: 3.19 Acres
098
ITEM NUMBER: B- 1
DATE: 10/23/2001
Attachment 8: Draft Resolution •
Tentative Parcel Map
TPM 2001-0019
5725 Portola Road
DRAFT
RESOLUTION
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVING
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2001-0019 THEREBY ALLOWING A TWO
LOT RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF APN 054-022-033 CONSISTENT
WITH THE PD-16 MASTER PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT (CUP 2001-0046)
(5725 Portola Road/APN 054-022-033 /Mike Messer)
WHEREAS, an application has been received from Mike Messer (PO Box 1661,
Atascadero, CA 93423) Applicant and Property Owner, to consider a project consisting of an
amendment to the City's Zoning Text to create a new Planned Development Overlay District
(PD 16), a zone change from RSF-Z (Residential Single Family—minimum lot size 1 1/2 to 2
%2 acres) to RSF-Z / PD-16 (Residential Single Family— minimum lot size 1 1/2 to 2 1/2 acres
with Planned Development Overlay 16), the adoption of a Master Plan of Development, and
a two-lot residential Tentative Parcel Map on APN 054-022-033; and, .
WHEREAS, the site's General Plan Designation is LDSF (Low Density Single-
Family; and,
WHEREAS, the site's current zoning district is RSF-Z (Residential Single Family;
with a minimum lot size of 1 1/2 to 2 %2 acres); and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended that the site be rezoned to
include a PD-16 overlay with a Master Plan of Development allowing a two-lot subdivision
of the site; and,
WHEREAS, the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and public notice of
environmental documents, as set forth in the State and local guidelines for implementation of
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) have been adhered to; and,
WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed public hearing upon the subject Tentative
Parcel Map application was held by the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero at
which hearing evidence, oral and documentary, was admitted on behalf of said application;
and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, at a public hearing
held on September 4, 2001, studied and considered Tentative Parcel Map 2001-0019, after
first studying and considering the Draft Negative Declaration prepared for the project; and, t
099
ITEM NUMBER: B- 1
DATE: 10/23/2001
• WHEREAS, the Atascadero City Council, at a duly noticed public hearing held on
October 23, 2001 studied and considered Tentative Parcel Map 2001-0019, after first
studying and considering the Proposed Negative Declaration prepared for the project.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council takes the following actions:
Section I. Findings of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map, the Planning
Commission of the City of Atascadero finds as follows:
a) The proposed subdivision, as conditioned, is consistent with the General Plan and
applicable zoning requirements.
b) The design and improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the
General Plan and applicable zoning requirements.
c) The proposed subdivision, as conditioned, is consistent with the Planned
Development Overlay District #16 Master Plan of Development (CUP 2001-
0046).
d) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed.
• e) The site is physically suitable for the density of development proposed.
f) The design and improvement of the proposed subdivision will not cause
substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish and
wildlife or their habitat.
g) The design of the subdivision will not conflict with easements acquired by the
public at large for access through, or the use of property within, the proposed
subdivision; or substantially equivalent alternative easements are provided.
h) The proposed subdivision design and type of improvements proposed will not be
detrimental to the health, safety or welfare of the general public.
SECTION 2. Approval. The Atascadero City Council, in a regular session
assembled on October 23, 2001 resolved to approve Tentative Parcel 2001-0019
subject to the following:
a) Exhibit A: Tentative Parcel Map 2001-0019
b) Exhibit B: Conditions of Approval
• On motion by Council Member and seconded by Council Member
the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted following roll call vote:
100
ITEM NUMBER: B- 1
DATE: 10/23/2001
r
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ADOPTED:
By:
Mike Arrambide, Mayor
Attest:
Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk •
Approved as to form:
Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney
•
101
ITEM NUMBER: B- 1
DATE: 10/23/2001
• Exhibit A:Tentative Parcel Map
TTM 2001-0005
r
vill ii
a a
q
� e� Ivzz•W�.r. O�� i
s t
I� ao
i
• r a
.a.,..�.,.. � ,a..,..s.... .a..,.:tea.
---------------- ------------A---—amu ----------,
I
102
ITEM NUMBER: B- 1
DATE: 10/23/2001
•
EXHIBIT B: Conditions of Approval
TPM 2001-0019
Conditions of Approval Timing Responsibility Mitigation
/Monitoring Measure
5725 Portola Road PM:Parcel Map GP: Services
GP.Grading Permit PS:
BP:Building Pemot BS:Building Services
TO:Temporary Occupancy FD:Fire Department
Tentative Parcel Map 2001-0019 FO:Final Occupancy PD:Police Department
Pl:Public Improvements CE City Engineer
WW:Wastewater
CA City Attomey
AMWC:Atascadero
Mutual Water Company
Planning Services
1. The approval of this application shall become final, subject PM PS
to the completion of the conditions of approval, fourteen
(14) days following the Planning Commission approval
unless prior to the time,an appeal to the decision is filed as
set forth in Section 9-1.111(b)of the Zoning Ordinance.
2. The Tentative Parcel Map application shall not be deemed
approved until the end of the ordinance referendum period
and enactment of Zone Change 2001-0016.
3. Approval of this Tentative Parcel Map shall be valid for two PM PS
years after its effective date. At the end of the period, the
approval shall expire and become null and void unless an
extension of time is granted pursuant to a written request
received prior to the expiration date.
4. The Community Development Department shall have the PM PS
authority to approve minor changes to the project that (1)
result in a superior site design or appearance, and/or (2)
address a construction design issue that is not substantive
to the Tentative Parcel Map.
5. The Parcel Map shall be subject to additional fees for park PM PS
or recreation purposes (QUIMBY Act) as required by City
Ordinance.
6. The granting of this entitlement shall apply to the property On going PS
located at 5725 Portola Road (APN 055-022-033)
regardless of owner.
7. The Hillside Preservation Easement shall be designated as FM PS
an Open Space Easement and recorded on the Final
Parcel Map.
8. Future construction on the lots shall be consistent with the BP PS
Master Plan of Development (CUP 2001-0046) approved
for the site.
103
ITEM NUMBER: B- 1
DATE: 10/23/2001
• Conditions Of Approval Timing Responsibility Mitigation
/Monitoring Measure
5725 Portola Road PM:Parcel Map GP: Services
GP:Grading Permit 9
BP:Building Permit BS:Building Services
TO:Temporary Occupancy FD:Fire Deparlment
Tentative Parcel Map 2001-0019 FO:Final Occupancy PD:Police Department
PI:Public Improvements CE City Engineer
WW:Wastewater
CA City Attorney
AMWC:Atascadero
Mutual Water Company
9. A parcel map drawn in substantial conformance with the PM PS
approved tentative map, and in compliance with all
conditions set forth herein, shall be submitted for review
and approval in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act
and the City's Subdivision Ordinance.
Engineering Conditions:
10. The applicant shall attempt to work with the easement FM CE
holders of the driveway to the north of the project to
share access on the existing driveway.
11. If a shared access can not be coordinated, the FM CE
applicant shall design and construct the driveway in
coordination with the property to the east and the
north (next to Portola Road). The driveway must be
designed not to confuse or endanger the public. The
access off Portola Road and at the end of the
• driveway must be designed and constructed to City
standards.
STANDARD CONDITIONS
12. All public Improvements shall be constructed in
conformance with the City Of Atascadero Engineering
Department Standard Specifications and Drawings or as
directed by the City Engineer.
13. The applicant shall enter into a Plan Check/[nspection BP CE
agreement with the City.
14. The applicant shall be responsible for the relocation and/or BP CE
alteration of existing utilities.
15. Concentrated or modified drainage shall cross lot lines only BP CE
where a drainage easement has been provided. Drainage
from off-site areas shall be conveyed across the project site
in drainage easements.
16. The applicant shall install all new utilities (water, gas, BP CE
electric, cable TV and telephone) underground. Utilities
shall be extended to the property line frontage of each lot or
its public utility easement
17. The applicant shall monument all property corners for Ongoing CE
construction control and shall promptly replace them if
• disturbed.
104
ITEM NUMBER: B- 1
DATE: 10/23/2001
Conditions of Approval Timing Responsibility Mitigation •
/Monitoring Measure
5725 Portola Road PM:Parcel Map
GP:Grading Permit PS:Planning Services
BP:Building Permit BS:Building Services
TO:Temporary Occupancy FD:Fre Department
Tentative Parcel Map 2001-0019 FO:Final Occupancy PD:Police Department
PI:Public Improvements CE City Engineer
WW:Wastewater
CA City Attorney
AMC:Atascadero
Mutual Water Company
18. A preliminary subdivision guarantee shall be submitted for FM CE
review in conjunction with the processing of the parcel map.
19. All existing and proposed utility, pipeline, open space, or FM CE
other easements are to be shown on the parcel map. If
there are building or other restrictions related to the
easements,they shall be noted on the parcel map.
20. Prior to recording the parcel map,the applicant shall submit FM CE
a map drawn in substantial conformance with the approved
tentative map and in compliance with all conditions set forth
herein shall be submitted for review and approval by the
City in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the
City's Subdivision Ordinance.
21. Prior to recording the parcel map, the applicant shall set FM CE
monuments at all new property corners and a registered
civil engineer or licensed land surveyor shall indicate, by
certificate on the final map, that corners have been set or
shall be set by a date specific and that they will be sufficient •
to enable the survey to be retraced.
22. Prior to recording the parcel map,the applicant shall pay all FM CE
outstanding plan check/inspection fees.
23. Prior to recording the parcel map, the applicant shall have FM CE
the map reviewed by all applicable public and private utility
companies (cable, telephone, gas, electric, Atascadero
Mutual Water Company).The applicant shall obtain a letter
from each utility company which indicates their review of the
map. The letter shall identify any new easements which
may be required by the utility company.A copy of the letter
shall be submitted to the City. New easements shall be
shown on the parcel map.
24. Upon recording the parcel map, the applicant shall provide FM CE
the City with a black line clear Mylar (0.4 mil) copy and a
blue line print of the recorded map.
25. Prior to recording the parcel map, the applicant shall FM
complete all improvements required by these conditions of
approval
Fire Marshal Conditions
26. The project shall provide an approved fire department tum- BP FD .
around. The turn-around shall be located within 150 feet of
the perimeter of either structure.
105
ITEM NUMBER: B- 1
DATE: 10/23/2001
• Conditions of Approval Timing Responsibility Mitigation
/Monitoring Measure
5725 Portola Road PM:
ParcelParcel Map
GP:Grading Permit PS:Planning Services
GP:
BP:Building Permit BS:Building Services
TO:Temporary Occupancy FD:Fire Department
Tentative Parcel Map 2001-0019 FO:Final Occupancy PD:Police Department
PI:Public Improvements CE City Engineer
WW:Wastewater
CA City Atomey
AMWC:Atascadero
Mutual Water Company
Atascadero Mutual Water Company(AMWC):
27. Prior to recording the map,the applicant shall prepare plans FM AMWC
that show all existing and proposed water distribution
facilities required to provide water service to the
subdivision. The plans shall be submitted for review and
approval by the Atascadero Mutual Water Company. All
water distribution facilities shall be constructed in
conformance with the Atascadero Mutual Water Company
standards and policies.
28. Prior to recording the parcel map the applicant shall obtain FM AMWC
a "Will Serve" letter from Atascadero Mutual Water
Company.
29. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall BP AMWC
pay all installation and connection fees required by the
Atascadero Mutual Water Company.
•
106
ITEM NUMBER: C-1
DATE: 10/23/2001
�
1918 ° 197979
Atascadero City Council
Staff Report — Public Works Department
Storm Drain Construction and Easement Acceptance
APN #028-361-002 (Garrison)
RECOMMENDATION:
Council:
1. Approve payment of $14,206.00 to Wilson Excavating and Grading for the removal and
relocation of a storm drain.
2. Accept the "Offer to Dedicate" a storm drain easement over the new storm drain.
• DISCUSSION:
The City of Atascadero constructed a storm drain in the late 1980's from Traffic Way to
Atascadero Creek. It was constructed across private property without the property owner's
knowledge or approval. The property is now developing as a mini storage and the owner has
requested that he be allowed to construct buildings over the storm drain. Staff denied this request
due to flooding problems and the inability to maintain or repair the storm drain.
Staff has worked with the property owner to resolve the issue. The owner has requested that the
City pay for the removal of the old storm drain, the construction of the new storm drain, the
design and survey of the storm drain, the easement preparation and the owners management and
supervision costs. Listed below are the costs for each of the items:
Removal of the old storm drain and construction of the new storm drain $14,206.00
Engineering, survey and easement preparation $1,800.00
Owner supervision and management $1,000.00
Staff recommends that the City reimburse the owner for the removal of the old storm drain and
the construction of the new storm drain, since the City built the existing storm drain without the
property owner's knowledge or approval. Staff does not recommend that the City reimburse the
owner for the other costs. Most of these costs would have been incurred on this project, without
• the storm drain relocation.
The owner has agreed to record an easement on the new storm drain and offer it for dedication to
the City.
107
ITEM NUMBER: C- 1
DATE: 10/23/2001
FISCAL IMPACT:
$14,206.00 (if staffs recommendation is accepted) These funds are budgeted in Capital Projects •
under"Minor Drainage Improvement Projects."
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Do not reimburse the contractor for the storm drain relocation
2. Reimburse the owner for his costs for the design and survey of the storm drain, the easement
preparation and for the management and supervision of the project.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Site map
2. Easement layout
•
i
108
y r
109
/
/
/c)
/ PTN. LOT 13 %
ADMINISTRATION PARK
4MB68
/ o� DOC. NO. 1999-007324
BMNMNQ
16.
15' WIDE STORM DRAIN
� �EASEMENT
CL STORM DRAIN PIPE
%b 15' WIDE STORM DRAIN
EASEMENT
I
I
I
I
I
NOT TO SCALE j 0
0
PREPARED FOR: ELMER GARRISON
X ,r PREPARED BY: EMK & ASSOCIATES, INC.
' ' 1005 RAILROAD STREET
PASO ROBLES, CA 93446
H:\1998\98-480\Condocs\Design 3—In 20001\98-480—EXHIBIT.dwg 02/08/01 0230:34 PM PST JOB #:98-480 (805) 238-5427
ITEM NUMBER: C-2
DATE: 10/23/2001
M Min,
iaia a is e
Atascadero City Council
Staff Report — Community Services Department
Atascadero Lake Park Master Plan
RECOMMENDATION:
Council adopt the draft Resolution approving the Atascadero Lake Park Master Plan.
DISCUSSION:
Atascadero Lake Park, the City's primary park is a source of pride for the citizens of Atascadero
and is home to the Charles Paddock Zoo and the Atascadero Lake Pavilion. This fifty-acre park
is one of the main community focal points and serves as the location for numerous community
events that bring thousands of visitors to the City. A significant number of Atascadero residents
use the Lake Park on a daily basis for leisure opportunities. Examples of these leisure activities
include; playing baseball at Alvord field, picnicking at the many benches throughout the park,
bird watching and listening to band concerts at the Gazebo. One of the most popular activities is
a brisk morning or evening walk around the lake. There is not another place in Atascadero that
provides the variety of recreational opportunities that so effectively provide a sense of
"community"to Atascadero.
Because Atascadero Lake Park has such an important value to the community, any changes,
improvements or modifications to it's layout and design, should be thoughtfully considered. In
the past, improvements to Atascadero Lake Park have been made without the benefit of a long
range plan. This type of long range planning for a park facility is generally accomplished
through a facility Master Plan. In order to provide the City with this long-range planning tool,
the City Council authorized an agreement with UP Productions as the consultant for the
Atascadero Lake Park Master Plan and Lake Pathway Design project.
Since authorization of this agreement, CJP Productions Principal Planner, Casey Patterson, has
led a process that has garnered significant public participation. This public participation has
involved the following:
• 1. 1,280 responses to a survey form mailed to all residences in Atascadero.
2. Two public workshops that had a combined attendance in excess of 100 participants.
3. Four (4) Atascadero Lake Park Master Plan Advisory Team meetings.
4. Two (2) Parks and Recreation Commission meetings.
ITEM NUMBER: C-2
DATE: 10/23/2001
The draft Atascadero Lake Park Master Plan is intended to provide the City with a long-range
development vision for the future as funding becomes available.
Two of the primary motivating factors for creating a Master Plan for Atascadero Lake Park were
the acquisition of the property located at the corner of Morro Road and Portola and the allocation
of funding for pathway improvements. This draft Master Plan will address these two issues as
well as provide a guideline for future development and improvements to the existing Park. A
copy of the draft Atascadero Lake Park Master Plan is attached. A copy of the accompanying
map is on display in the Community Services Office and will be presented at the City Council
meeting on October 23, 2001.
One of the first activities of the master plan process was to develop goals & objectives. The
following list of goals and objectives was created at a public workshop to help guide the design
process:
• Improve Pathway Around Lake • Improve Existing Boat Dock, Pool &
• Improve Water Quality Wall (North Side of Pavilion)
• Provide & Improve Parking at Park & ■ Develop Plan for City Property on Lake
Zoo View Drive
• Develop Design for newly Acquired • Develop Plan for Southern Part of Park
Land & Island
• Interface and mesh Park Design with • Preserve & Enhance Wildlife at Park
Zoo • Enhance Experience for Park Users
• Create an "Entrance" to the Park and • Maintain Current Visual Essence of Park
Zoo from State Route 41
In addition to the goals & objectives listed above, the results of 1,280 responses to a community-
wide Atascadero Lake Park Master Plan Survey were also used to help guide the design plans.
A few of the main points found in the survey were:
1. Water quality concerns received the most significant number of volunteered responses
and is the most significant Lake Park priority of the survey respondents.
2. Walking around the lake is the most common park activity listed by the survey
respondents, corresponding with the fact that pathway improvements were also listed as a
significant priority.
3. A significant number of survey respondents indicated that they like Atascadero Lake Park
"like it is," and recommended limited changes.
4. Although not addressed in the Master Plan, the issue of dog waste around the lake
pathway is also a significant concern of the survey respondents.
Based on the information gathered during the master plan process, the results of the survey and
comments from the previous Parks and Recreation Commission, a plan has been developed that
incorporates the following:
• Maintain the visual essence of Atascadero Lake Park as a rural country park with mostly •
passive activities. Maintain the integrity of the existing main park area and limit the number
of changes.
112
ITEM NUMBER: C-2
DATE: 10/23/2001
• • Improve the pathway around the lake, using a surface that is in keeping with the rural nature
of the community.
• Incorporate design features in the plan that will assist in the improvement of the lake water
quality. The goal is to improve water quality to a State standard would allow swimming/
body contact.
• Additional parking spaces at various locations throughout the Lake Park and surrounding
areas and the redesign of the park's existing parking lots to increase capacity.
• Significant renovations to the lake shoreline within the park to improve or replace the
existing structures and walkways that are significantly deteriorating. These renovations will
include replacement or removal of the existing dock area, wading pool, pier and shoreline
walk.
• Improve the front parking lot area and recently acquired property near Alvord Field by the
addition of landscaping, improved parking lot designs and the addition of limited picnic
areas, walkways, turf areas and activity features. Enhancements are also recommended for
the entrance to the Charles Paddock Zoo.
• Creation of a native botanical garden area on City owned property along Lakeview Drive.
Rock bollards will also be recommended in this area to keep out four-wheel drive vehicles.
The draft Atascadero Lake Park Master Plan has seven (7) distinctive areas. The Atascadero
Parks and Recreation Commission has reviewed and recommended approval of all seven (7) of
the areas. In addition, the Parks and Recreation Commission recommended that the City Council
• approve the staff and consultant recommendations for the pathway width and surface material.
Staff and the Consultant have recommended that the pathway be constructed of a natural-looking
material such as D.G. (decomposed granite), with the option for staff at some future point to use
a soil binding agent that will make a more durable pathway surface that is more resistant to
erosion. The public workshops have also demonstrated a desire on the part of a majority of the
participants to use a material that maintains the current pathway look and color.
Regarding the pathway width, staff and the Consultant recommend that wherever reasonably
possible, the pathway width be established at eight foot. This eight-foot width is consistent with
common design practices and guidelines established for pathways. An eight-foot wide pathway
will allow for pedestrians travelling in opposite directions to pass each other on the trail without
walking into the street, which now occurs frequently along Marchant and Lake View. The eight-
foot width may be reduced to six foot in areas where the cost is prohibitive and/or where
significant environmental impact may result from an eight foot wide path.
The cost estimates to construct all portions of this ambitious draft plan is approximately $2.8
million dollars. Funding is available for some of the proposed projects, $167,000 is currently
funded for pathway improvements and $68,000 in Proposition 12 funds has been allocated to
Atascadero Lake Park by the City Council. The funds for the additional proposed improvements
are not currently funded, nor would staff anticipate that any significant portion of these funds be
allocated anytime soon. As park improvement funds become available over the next ten to
twenty years, staff will have a blueprint for prioritizing improvement projects at Atascadero Lake
• Park.
In addition to the estimated construction costs, the proposed improvements may require minor
increases to the annual maintenance and operations costs of the Lake Park. The three most
113
ITEM NUMBER: C-2
DATE: 10/23/2001
significant areas of potential increase to annual maintenance and operations costs are the •
following:
1. Increased Turf Area: Approximately one acre of additional turf area would be added to
the park. This additional turf area, similar in size to the Sunken Gardens lawn, will require
approximately four to six hours per week of additional staff time for mowing and routine
maintenance. In addition, water costs will result from this additional turf area. The anticipated
increased cost for this additional turf area is approximately $18,000.00 per year.
2. Swimming Area: Swimming in the lake will require lifeguard supervision. This
proposed swimming area will replace the existing Lake Park Wading Pool. The related cost
savings would offset some of the increased costs for the supervision of this swimming area. The
anticipated annual cost for the supervision of the Swimming area would be approximately
$24,000.00 per year. The creation of a swimming area would require improvements to the lake
water quality. The cost to improve lake water quality and the related annual operational costs are
not included in this estimate.
3. Circulation pumps: Two pumps are included'in the plan to circulate Lake water and to
create a "live creek" affect along the existing spillway. The inclusion of the pumps will require
additional electrical costs. The anticipated annual cost increase for these two circulation pumps
is approximately $12,000.00 per year.
The total increased annual maintenance and operations cost for the fully developed Lake Park
Master Plan would be approximately $54,000.00 per year. Staff recommends that the City
Council adopt the Draft Resolution approving the Atascadero Lake Park Master Plan
FISCAL IMPACT:
Adoption of the resolution to approve the draft Atascadero Lake Park Master Plan will have no
immediate financial impact on the City of Atascadero. The estimated construction costs to
complete the entire plan is 2.8 million dollars. The estimated annual maintenance and
operational costs if the entire plan is constructed is $54,000.00 per year.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Draft Resolution
2. Draft Atascadero Lake Park Master Plan
e
114
DRAFT RESOLUTION
•
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ATASCADERO ADOPTING THE ATASCADERO LAKE PARK MASTER
PLAN.
WHEREAS, The City of Atascadero (herein referred to as "City") is a public entity
established under the laws of California, and
WHEREAS, Atascadero Lake Park is a public facility owned and operated by the City;
and
WHEREAS, approximately three acres of property has been acquired adjacent to
Atascadero Lake Park; and
WHEREAS, the City desires a plan to develop this property in accordance with a Master
Plan for the entire park; and
WHEREAS, a draft Master Plan for the long-range development of Atascadero Lake
Park has been developed with extensive public comment and participation.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT, the City Council of the City of Atascadero
does hereby approve the draft Atascadero Lake Park Master Plan designed by CJP Productions.
On Motion by Council Member and seconded by Council Member
the foregoing Resolution was adopted on the following roll-call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ADOPTED:
CITY OF ATASCADERO
J. Michael Arrambide, Mayor
ATTEST:
•
Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk
115
r► a r► r► r►a
r
I:
I
t
i
{
k
{
PREPARED i
• PRODUCTIONS
After two public workshops, analyzing a community survey, four Lake Park
Master Plan Advisory Team Meetings, two Park & Recreation Commission's
meetings, the landscape architectural firm of CJP Productions has developed a
Master Plans for the park.
Information gathered from the first public workshop helped direct the design of
the park. The visual essence is to maintain a rural country park with mostly
passive activities. The main visual elements of the City of Atascadero are the oak
forest, rolling hills, unique rocks (Casey Patterson, lead park designer calls them
"Claystone■), and the lake park. The main visual elements of the existing
Atascadero Lake Park are the rolling lawns, unique rocks, dirt pathways, oak
forest, the lake. The design has tried to achieve this goal by retaining these
features and introducing others to enhance this character. A design that imposes
hard surfaces, ridged lines, esoteric design elements would be out of character
for this park.
41M 1 111 1
N Off`
The plan developed is a physical plan that shows development intent and
suggests how all pieces of the design fit together. This type of plan is called a
. master plan. A master plan typically does not include detail designs for the
physical elements of the plan. This work is left to the site plan design phase.
The site plan design phase is accomplished by producing detail drawings
showing form, position, materials, and locations. These documents are used for
the construction of the design elements. In this light, the intent of the plan
developed by CJP Productions is general in nature and will direct the
development of future site plans for each area of the park.
A master plan is also defined as a physical plan, showing physical elements
(i.e.: walkways, lawns, picnic areas, docks, buildings, planting areas, etc.) of the
design. A master plan typically doesn't provide management plans unless
specifically requested by the client.
GOALS & 0 C
One of the first activities of the master plan process was the development of
goals & objectives that the design must achieve. CJP Productions used the
following list to guide the design of the park:
• Improve Water Quality
• Improve Pathway Around Lake
• Provide & Improve Parking at Park & Zoo
■ Develop Design for newly Acquired Land
• Interface and Mesh Park Design with Zoo
• Create an "Entrance" to the Park and Zoo
I
• Improve Existing Boat Dock, Pool &Wall (North Side of Pavilion) •
• Develop Plan for City Property on Lake View Drive
• Develop Plan for Southern Part of Park & Island
• Preserve & Enhance Wildlife at Park
• Enhance Experience for Park Users
• Maintain Current Visual Essence of Park
W
One of the main goals of the Atascadero Lake Master Plan is to improve the
water quality of the lake. The physical design for the park attempts to improve
water quality through design features. The projects proposed by the master plan
design improves water quality by:
■ Controlling and improving offsite drainage where it enters site boundaries.
• Controlling and improving site drainage where it enters the lake.
• Improving shoreline conditions by introducing bio-filtration wetlands to filter
inflow into the lake.
• Providing water circulation systems to move water through areas of the lake.
■ Improve pathway around lake by providing a non-erodable surface, controlling
drainage and proving a suitable width for the pathway so users will not walk
off the path preventing erosion.
The City has an Atascadero Lake water quality report that it uses as a master
plan for water quality improvements. The Atascadero Lake Park Master Plan is
not focusing on detail of water quality solutions.
N SOLMONS O
The following is a description of design elements of the park master plan that
strengthen the existing visual feeling of the park:
The park design can be broken down into component areas and each will be
discussed separately. These areas are shown on the following page. Some
elements are carried throughout the park, these elements are:
• Soil Cement Pathways
Pathway materials
The existing pathway that encircles the lake is a valuable asset of the park. Its
current surfacing is compacted pit sand (called D.G.), the color and feeling
strengthens the rural nature of the park. There are two major problems with this
material in its use at the park. One is maintenance the other is erosion. D.G. is
not a long lasting surface material and must be re-graded yearly to retain a
smooth surface. Other surfacing materials, such as asphalt or concrete, would
ruin the current aesthetic appeal of the pathway. •
2
{ 0-Y
Q
{
fA
M t {k
00 it {
rl
Lf)
13 0
LL sisj
Q ' r
.� , m IM
t�
AV
•fir`""'^ !�� p �.
���� • R a: Nf? \
r
Q
An alternative is to use products called soil cement (soil additive) that can be
incorporated into the existing site materials and retain the "dirt pathway" feel.
Two such products are PolyPavemment and Perma-zyme 11. These products
are diluted with water and dispersed, causing the soil to bond under compaction
into a dense, permanent base that resists water penetration and wear. Another
advantage of these products is they cost less to install than other types of
surfacing (concrete & asphalt). The recommended material for the pathway is
D.G. with some type of soil additive to prevent erosion and to reduce pathway
maintenance.
One of the goals of the master plan is to improve water quality. One way to help
improve Water Quality is with the design of this pathway. This entails providing a
surface that is not erodible. By not having a surface that is loose (D.G. or native
soil) which by the action of nature and users can be washed into the lake. The
design should provide a pathway width that will be wide enough not to have
users walkirunning off the path. if pathway users are forced to go off path it is
possible that they will walk onto the shore causing erosion.
Pathway Width
The design for the pathway recommends a width of eight (8) feet where possible
for most of the pathway around the park. This recommendation for this width has
been developed by researching standards for this type of circulation system,
observing and using the current pathways at the park, and expected growth in .
users of the pathway.
Where the design calls for less width, this is a result of expected increase of cost
to install the pathway. The main reason is the cost to install large retaining walls.
The designer of the master plan with his education in an aesthetic art
(Landscape Architecture) feels strongly that an 8' wide pathway would not
visually impact the lake.
• Parcourse Station
A parcourse is a series of exercise events occurring at separate stations, which
are located along a trail or path ranging from a quarter-mile to one mile in length.
Park users walk or jog between stations. Each station provides instructions and
apparatus for the specified exercises such as: Achilles Stretch, Hamstring
Stretch, Sit & Reach, Knee Lift, Log Hop, Half Knee Bends, Body Curl, chin-up,
Bench Curl, sit-up, Vault Bar, push-up, Bench Leg Raise, Bench Dips, and Leg
Stretch.
• Bio-filtration Wetland
To control and reduce runoff pollution from surrounding areas. Bio-filtration
wetlands are proposed at critical inflow into the lake. Stormwater wetlands are
engineered ecosystems designed to remove pollutants from rainfall runoff. The •
discharge of"cleaner' Stormwater helps protect the quality of the lake's water.
3
• The wetland removes pollutants by temporarily storing Stormwater in shallow
pools that create ideal growing conditions for wetland plants. The plants and
associated microbiology act to filter sediments, uptake nutrients, and biodegrade
carbonaceous materials.
■ Rock Bollards
The rock °Ciaystone» is abundant throughout Atascadero and it's one of its
identifying physical features. The"Claystone" is currently being used at the
southern end of the lake as a bollard, separating parking and roadway from the
pathway. The use of this rock is maintained and is used as bollards to separate
function, delineate uses and to accent areas. This is a low cost material to use
and it re-enforces the rural, country feel of this park.
■ Picnic Areas
There are five new picnic areas designed for the park. These areas will have a
mix of tables, trash containers, benches and/or BBQ pits.
■ Signs
Park signs are located throughout the site. Five signs are located at the main
road intersections to greet potential users. A sign located at the main entry into
the park and zoo parking area. This sign would be information sign (a
changeable letter sign) showing current or scheduled activities at the park and
zoo. A small directional sign is also located within this parking area showing the
way to the main entry into zoo.
■ Tree Locations
The master plan shows general locations and tree types throughout the park.
Again, the location and type of trees for the path is general in nature and will
direct the future design of planting plans in the future.
Area 41 - Baseball Meld & Zoo
■ The Great Lawn
The newly acquired parcel of land at the southeast corner of Morro Road and
Portola Road is a valuable addition to the park. This piece of land adds a sorely
needed accent point to the park, a point of arrival and a welcoming element for
new visitors. This new land will also allow for expansion of the lawn area, pulling
one of the best features of the existing park to this accent point and making it
visible from Mono Road. The lawn area will provide a large grass area missing
from the existing park and be used for informal play.
As part of the design of the lawn, a "turf rings" area is shown. With this
material, install under the grass (not visible) this area can be used for parking
expansion.
■ Expanded Parking
The newly acquired land will provide needed parking areas for the Baseball field,
Zoo and park in general.
■ Existing Overflow Swale
No change is planned for this feature.
4
• Basketball court •
A half Basketball court has been added. The design of the court is round to fit
into the curvilinear design of this area.
• The Zoo, Perimeter Wall& Entrance
Currently the Charles Paddock Zoo is going through its own Master Plan Design
process. The Master Plan for the park must dovetail with the Zoo's Master Plan.
The future expansion plans for the Zoo must also do the same. The plan shows a
perimeter wall for the Zoo. The North and East sections show the location for
future expansion of the Zoo.
The plan also shows the location of the new gift shop and how the parking lot
interfaces with the entry of the Zoo.
• Park& Zoo info Kiosk
Located at the Zoo entrance area is a Kiosk for posting information about the
park and Zoo.
• Storage Yard
Because of the required use of bulk material in the operation of the Zoo and park
and limited space for it's storage, it is proposed that the City owned property on
Morro Road across from the park should be used for this facility. It would be an
optimal location for such use because of its' close location to the park. This area
could also be expanded to include staff offices.
■ Existing Baseball Field
The existing field is to remain and no changes have been included to its design
and layout.
• Main Park Entrance
The main entrance into the park and zoo has been moved to the East. The
entrance has been turned into a focal point with accent planting, boulders and a
signage.
Area 2 - Existing Park
• Existing Play Ground
The playground with the new curved wall and play structure is quite attractive
and complies with ADA and CSP. The existing play area to the east needs to be
improved to current design standards. The design replaces the swings with
compliant ones and provides new perimeter curbing and walkway.
• Sand volleyball Court
The existing court has been removed because of conflict with the Zoo's sculpture
garden. A new volleyball court is proposed by the existing restroom.
• Reconfigured Parking Area at Pavilion
The existing parking lot has been re-designed for better circulation and entry into
the Zoo and Pavilion.
• Existing Restrooms
The existing restrooms are to remain, but need to be upgrade to comply with
A.D.A.
• Horseshoe Pit
The existing horseshoe pit has been relocated to the south side of Ranger
House. The current location conflicts with the pathway system that circles the •
lake.
s
Area 3 - New Promenade Area
• The Pond
The new pond is a part of the lake re-circulation system. Water from this pond
will be pumped back into the lake at a location just past the swimming area. The
design will act like a skimmer for a swimming pool, cleansing the surface water of
deterious floating materials.
• Bridges
The existing bridge, which spans the lake overflow, doesn't comply with current
building codes as it relates to guard rails. The bridge will be replaced or rebuilt to
comply with current standards.
A small pedestrian bridge is located just north of the sand beach areas. The
bridge will span the lake's outflow creek. The bridge will connect the new boat/
dock area with the promenade area.
• Lake Out Flow
The proposed outflow of the lake is to be articulated with large rocks and
boulders creating a low waterfall on the low side of the outflow.
• Sand Beach
On each side of the outflow of the lake is a sand beach area for children play and
for sunbathers.
■ Waterfall
At the end of the outflow stream of the lake is a waterfall that spills into the pond.
Height of the fall is about 2'. This activity will help add oxygen into the take water.
• Access Ramp to Docks
An 8' wide ramp complying with ADA regulations is shown on the south side of
the dam. This ramp is needed for bringing boating materials and equipment
down to the dock and boat rental building. This ramp is currently in the process
of being review by the State's Division of Safety of Dams.
■ Boat Rental and Pump House
The existing boat rental building (along with existing pool/pool area) is very
substandard. The new location of the boathouse is more appropriate due to new
location of proposed ramp. By relocating it to the dam it opens the new
promenade area to greater design possibilities.
The building will also contain pumping equipment for the re-circulating system
of the pond.
• Boat Docks
A new reconfigured boat dock has been designed for the dam area.
• Lifeguard Station
At the end of the dock is a planned life guard station to supervise the swimming
area of the lake.
■ Swimming Area
The dock will partially enclose a swimming area for the lake. Parents and the
lifeguards will easily supervise the area selected for this activity. Enclosing the
remaining swimming area will be buoys connecting to the dock and promenade.
•
6
• Sculpture Location •
At the northern accent terminus of the promenade is planned a location for a
piece of sculpture. It is highly recommended that a local artist be commissioned
for the work.
is Covered Amphitheater Stage
The location of the amphitheater stage is over the lakeshore and at the base of
the mounded lawn area. This natural feature will provide elevated views to the
stage. The structure covering the stage for sun protection is fabric, which will
have a light feeling while bringing down the cost of construction.
• Play Fountain
At the intersection of the existing walk, which leads to the lake and the
promenade, is a play fountain. This type of fountain does not have an exposed
water basin, but shoots a column of water straight into the air from an orifice in
the pavement. The water lands on a hard surface (concrete or pavers) and
seeps into a concealed basin to be re-circulated again. This type of fountain
leads itself for people (mostly kids) to play in its cascades.
• New Wall at Promenade
A new wall is planned for the lakeside of the promenade. This wall is required to
expand the existing park into the lake. The material for the wall would be the
"Claystone" rock with a metal railing on top.
■ Promenade
A 24'wide promenade that extends 240' feet is planned for the lake edge
between the pavilion and new amphitheater stage. This area is to be used for
expanding park's special events (craft shows, wine festival, etc.). The pavement
for the promenade is masonry pavers that could be used for park construction
donations (name in brick).
Area 4 = West Lake Shone
■ Wedding Gazebo
A wedding gazebo is planned for the west side of the Pavilion. The gazebo is to
be built over the existing concrete footings of an old pier. Because of the
beautiful view of the lake, this gazebo is an ideal location for photo opportunities
for weddings at the pavilion.
■ New Parking Area -
A new parking area is designed for the vacant city owned lot at the intersection of
Marchant Way and Santa Rosa road. By changing the road configuration, this lot
provides an area for a parking lot and other activities.
■ Picnic Area and Parcourse Station
A Parcourse station and picnic area is planned for the expanded area at the
intersection of Marchant Way and Santa Rosa Road.
■ The Pathway
The pathway will be improved on this side of the lake.
• Rock Bollards •
Rock bollards are added in strategic positions to help define use areas.
Area 5 o- East Lake Shore
The Light Nouse
A feature from the past has been added to the lake park design. Located on an
axial line across from the play fountain is a lighthouse. The structure would be a
replica of the lighthouse that used to be at the lake. The lighthouse would be lit
only on special occasions at the park.
• New Parking, Picnic and Parcourse Areas
A new picnic area is added to this side of the lake along with improved parking
area. These are located halfway between Portola and Santa Rosa roads. A
Parcourse station with small parking area is designed for the intersection of
Portola Road and Lake View drive.
• Retaining Walls
The narrowest point in the pathway around the park is the area just south of the
proposed lighthouse on Lake View Drive. To provide a pathway through this
area retaining walls would be required. The wall would be faced with stone to
match other masonry elements in the park design. However, to install the wall
would mean the destruction of existing trees.
• The Pathway
The pathway will be improved on this side of the lake.
• Boat ramp with Dock
Included in the design for the park is a new boat ramp. This is for the loading
• and unloading of boats. Along side the ramp would be a small dock to help
assist this activity.
• Rock Bollards
Rock bollards are added in strategic positions to help define use areas.
Area 6 - Island & South lake Area
• Island Re-circulation System
Because of the shape of this section of lake (poor water circulation) and to help
improve water quality, a water recirculatory system has been designed. This
system would be a pumped system with its outlet (headwater) located at the
pedestrian bridge. From there water would fall into the lake and make its way
through the wetlands into the main section of the lake. Return inlet pipes would
be located on the north side of the lake.
• Bio-filtration Around Island
The existing shoreline and lake around island and mainland will be reconfigured
to create a natural bio-filtration wetland. The plan shows that a narrow (20 wide
minimum) meandering channel will be created on the east and west side of the
island toward the north tip of the island. In this area will be planted aquatic plants
to filter water for the lake. The width of the southerly section of the lake around
the island will be maintained.
i
• Bird Watcher Gazebo
On the east side of the island on the mainland a bird watchers gazebo is
proposed. This structure would be rustic in nature and have information on the
abundance of birds that live at the lake. A small viewing/picnic area is also
included for the area.
• Pedestrian Bridge
A new bridge is proposed for the south part of the lake. The new bridge would
replace the dilapidated wood bridge along Santa Rosa. The bridge would have a
spillway and be built out of natural stone materials.
• Bird Sanctuary
The island would be enhanced to become a bird sanctuary. Currently the
understory of the island is mostly covered with introduced plants (Anisette and
Hemlock) with native trees ringing it's perimeter Willows and Cottonwoods). The
introduced plants should be removed and be re-vegetated with plantings that will
enhance its birdholding capacity.
• Fire Pit
A fire pit is located at the most southerly part of the park. This is added to help
support special holiday events and activities at the park.
• New Restroom & Pump House
A new restroom is proposed which is sorely needed for this part of the lake.
Included with this building is a drinking fountain and room for pump equipment.
• Graded Hill
Located on the east side of the island on Lake View Drive is a lone hill with a
massive oak tree on top. It proposed that the hill be graded in such a way not
to injure the oak but provide a large open area for park users.
In this area where a level area has been created, the following park features
will be added:
• Picnic Area, Parcourse Station and Lawn
• Stone wall
A stone wall is shown on the plan that connects to the pedestrian bridge along
Santa Rosa road. The wall provides better protection for park users from traffic
hazards.
• Rock Bollards
Rock bollards are added in strategic positions to help define use areas.
Area 7 - Natural & Botanical Area
• Nature Center
A building to be used for nature education is located on the east side of the lake
by the boat ramp.
• Botanical Garden and Natural Areas
The plan shows a great amount of the city owned land on Lakeview will be
retained as natural, or have a botanical garden developed on it.
• Parking area
A parking area is proposed for this area to help support the proposed activities.
9
OTMM NON
MTCMS
The current park facilities show that a few elements do not comply with
Americans with disability Act (ADA) and other codes and restrictions, thus needs
to be upgraded. The following is a list of features that need improvement:
• Bathrooms
Fixture and stalls need to be upgraded
■ Playground
The current swings and large play structure do not have accessibility surfacing
leading from an accessible walkway to these elements.
Both swing sets do not meet current CSPC codes for seating and clearance.
The swings need to be replaced. The large play structure does not comply with
ADAC because it does not have wheelchair accessibility platforms. The large
spiral slide is also too close to the play ground edge. (Not enough clearance)
■ Bridges
The existing bridges do not comply with current building codes for guardrails.
Both need to have guardrails installed that comply with UBC building codes.
•
Enclosed is an estimate to construct the proposed design for the park. The
estimate is broken down into the seven areas described in the preceding
discussion on elements in the park master plan. The total cost to construct is
estimated to be 2.8 million dollars. This cost is an estimate to complete the
master plan as designed, but because the plan is general in nature, the actual
cost could be less or more that the estimated cost. A more precise estimated
cost can not be completed until final site design plans are completed for each
area.
10
The extent of the park master plan is large, complex and costly and beyond the
scope of the City to construct all at once. Below is a phasing schedule to
develop and construct the proposed design. These areas are referenced to an
enclosed phasing plan (next page).
PHASE NO. AREA
1 Marchant & Lake View Pathways
2 Water Quality Improvements
(Not included in this plan)
3 Portola & Morro Rds. Area
4 Main Parking Area
5 Island & South Lake Area
6 Dam Area
7 Promenade Area
8 Santa Rosa &Marchant Parking Area
9 Pavilion Parking Area
10 Boat Ramp Area
11 Botanical/Natural Area
11
' �
LO
i
4 ��
4�
y•` �' co
f �
IL: z
N + Q
0) W
Q
0
i
fly;
i
M
AtaseadAwe Lake Park Waster P •
=W
The results of the survey mail out to locale citizens about the park are shown in a
graphic format following this section. The results are from 1,280 responses
received back from the survey.
The graphs show the results of Question 1 through 8. Questions 1,2,11 and
12 required a written response. The results are discussed below:
• Question one asked if other passive park activities should be added. The
most popular reply based on 1,280 responses was swimming pool with 12
requests. The next was concerts with 6 requests.
• Question two asked what activities do you participate in at the park. The
most popular were concerts with 29 responses. The other responses were
minor being less than 3.
• Question 11 asked what was the most important issue in the future
development of the park. The major results were:
1. Clean water-134
2. Improve conditions of the path-'79
3. Protect Integrity-65
4. No dog poop-56
5. Improve lighting-41
6. Swimming pool-32
7. Safety-30
• Question 12 asked what do you consider the most important issue at
Atascadero take Park. The major results were:
1. Clean Water-268
2. Improve paths condition-64
3. Protect Integrity-46
4. Cleanliness-44
S. Safety-44
6. No dog poop-43
7. Improved Maintenance-31
•
12
ATASCADERO LAKE PARK
LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION ESTIMATE
14-Sep-01
AREA#1 - BASEBALL FIELD & ZOO AREA
NO. ITEM UNIT QUAN. UNIT COST ITOTAL COST
1 SITE GRADING S.F. 215,305 $0.10 $21,531
2 B.B. STANDARDS EA. 1 $1,200.00 $1,200
3 LIGHTING L.S. 1 $30,000.00 $30,000
PAVING TYPES
4 A.C. with curb S.F. 91,961 $1.75 $160,932
5 CONCRETE S.F. 28,560 $3.50 $99,960
6 PAVER S.F. 4,395 $6.00 $26,370
7 SOIL CEMENT S.F. 3,300 $1.00 $3,300
8 INFO KIOSK EA. 1 $16,000.00 $16,000
9 ROCK EA. 24 $100.00 $2,400
10 SIGN EA. 4 $1,200.00 $4,800
11 BULK STORAGE YARD L.S. 1 $25,000.00 $25,000
11 TABLE, BENCHS&TRASH CANS L.S. 1 $6,000.00 $6,000
PLANTING AREAS
12 PREP TO GRADE S.F. 90,059 $0.06 $5,404
13 IRRIGATION S.F. 90,059 $0.50 $45,030
14 LAWN, HYDROSEED S.F. 40,305 $0.12 $4,837
15 ORNAMENTAL S.F. 20,566 $0.40 $8,226
12 RIPARIAN S.F. 10,985 $0.40 $4,394
16 XERISCAPE S.F. 18,622 $0.40 $7,449
TREES
17 LARGE ACCENT TREE EA. 17 $150.00 $2,550
18 SHADE TREE EA. 67 $150.00 $10,050
19 SMALL ACCENT TREE EA. 9 $150.00 $1,350
21 RIPARIAN TREE EA. 5 $150.00 $750
22 XERISCAPE TREE EA. 8 $150.00 $1,200
TOTAL $488,731
•
AREA#2 - EXISTING PARK
NO. ITEM UNIT QUAN. UNIT COST TOTAL COST
1 VOLLEYBALL COURT EA 1 $7,500.00 7,500
2 CONTAINMENT CURB AT PLAYGROUND L.F 180 $6.00 1,080
3 WALKWAY AT PLAYGROUND S.F. 900 $3.50 3,150
4 NEW SWINGS E.A 2 $2,400.00 4,800
5 ADA SURFACING S.F. 600 $12.00 7,200
6 SITE GRADING S.F. 54,653 $0.10 5,465
PAVING TYPES
7 A.0 WITH CURB S.F. 44,688 $1.75 78,204
8 CONCRETE S.F. 8,807 $3.50 30,825
9 LIGHTING, PARKING L.S. 1 $16,000.00 16,000
10 PAVERS S.F. 1,158 $6.00 6,948
PLANTING AREAS
11 RENOVATE LAWN &IRRIGATION SYSTEM S.F. 14,400 $2.00 28,800
12 IRRIGATION S.F. 15,988 $0.50 7,994
13 LAWN, HYDROSEED S.F. 4,404 $0.12 528
TREES
14 ORNAMENTAL S.F. 11,584 $0.40 4,634
15 SHADE TREE EA 13 $150.00 1,950
TOTAL 205,078
• AREA#3 - DAM & PROMENADE
NO. ITEM UNIT IQUAN. JUNIT COST TOTAL COST
1 SITE DEMO L.S. 1 $20,000.00 $20,000
2 SITE GRADING S.F. 34,000 $0.10 $3,400
3 GRADE BOAT RAMP L.S. 1 $3,500.00 $3,500
4 UTILITIES L.S. 1 $30,000.00 $30,000
5 AMPHITHEATRE STRUCTURE L.S. 1 $20,000.00 $20,000
6 BIOFILTRATION WETLAND L.S. 1 $10,000.00 $10,000
7 BUOYS L.F. 115 $20.00 $2,300
8 BRIDGE E.A. 2 $8,000.00 $16,000
9 DOCK S.F. 5,463 $25.00 $136,575
10 BOAT&PUMP HOUSE L.S. 1 $180,000.00 $180,000
11 PLAY FOUNTAIN EA. 1 $45,000.00 $45,000
12 HORSESHOE PITS EA. 2 $3,000.00 $6,000
PAVING TYPES
13 AMPHITHEATRE BOARDWALK S.F. 5,145 $25.00 $128,625
14 CONCRETE S.F. 17,161 $3.50 $60,064
15 PAVER S.F. 9,404 $6.00 $56,424
16 SAND BEACH S.F. 1,043 $6.00 $6,258
17 SOIL CEMENT S.F. 3,168 $1.00 $3,168
18 ROCK EA. 54 $100.00 $5,400
19 SCULPTURE EA. 1 $30,000.00 $30,000
20 WALL L.F. 561 $80.00 $44,880
21 WALL RAILING L.F. 561 $22.00 $12,342
22 PATHWAY LIGHT SYSTEM L.F. 396 $30.00 $11,880
23 POND L.S. 1 $13,000.00 $13,000
24 SPILL WAY L.S. 1 $5,000.00 $5,000
PLANTING AREAS
25 PREP TO GRADE S.F. 34,557 $0.06 $2,073
26 IRRIGATION S.F. 34,557 $0.50 $17,279
27 LAWN, HYDROSEED S.F. 5,000 $0.12 $600
28 ORNAMENTAL S.F. 2,088 $0.40 $835
29 RIPARIAN S.F. 27,469 $0.40 $10,988
TREES
30 SHADE TREE EA. 15 $150.00 $2,250
31 SMALL ACCENT TREE EA. 3 $150.00 $450
32 RIPARIAN TREE EA. 47 $150.00 $7,050
TOTAL $891,340
•
AREA#4 -WEST SIDE OF LAKE
NO.JITEM UNIT IQUAN. UNIT COST TOTAL COST
1 BIOFILTRATION WETLAND EA. 2 $10,000.00 $20,000
2 SITE GRADING&DRAINAGE L.S. 1 $30,000.00 $30,000
3 GAZEBO L.S. 1 $30,000.00 $30,000
4 PAR COURSE EA. 1 $6,000.00 $6,000
PAVING TYPES
5 A.C. S.F. 6,093 $1.50 $9,140
6 BOARDWALK S.F. 554 $25.00 $13,850
7 SOIL CEMENT EDGE L.F. 1,496 $6.00 $8,976
8 SOIL CEMENT S.F. 21,405 $1.00 $21,405
9 ROCK EA. 50 $100.00 $5,000
10 SIGN EA. 1 $1,200.00 $1,200
11 TABLE EA. 3 $600.00 $1,800
PLANTING AREAS
12 PREP TO GRADE S.F. 60,805 $0.06 $3,648
13 IRRIGATION S.F. 60,805 $0.50 $30,403
14 ORNAMENTAL S.F. 2,529 $0.40 $1,012
15 RIPARIAN S.F. 41,361 $0.40 $16,544
16 XERISCAPE S.F. 16,915 $0.40 $6,766
TREES
17 LARGE ORNAMENTAL TREE EA. 5 $150.00 $750
18 SMALL ORNAMENTAL TREE EA. 3 $150.00 $450
19 RIPARIAN TREE EA. 78 $150.00 $11,700
20 SHADE TREE EA. 11 $150.00 $1,650
TOTAL $220,293
AREA#5 - EAST SIDE OF LAKE
NO. ITEM UNIT IQUAN. JUNiTCOST* TOTAL COST
1 BIOFILTRATION WETLAND EA. 2 $10,000.00 $20,000
2 SITE GRADING&DRAINAGE L.S. 1 $50,000.00 $50,000
3 BOAT RAMP EA. 1 $12,000.00 $12,000
4 WALLS L.F. 473 $120.00 $56,760
5 DOCK S.F. 228 $25.00 $5,700
6 LIGHTHOUSE EA. 1 $30,000.00 $30,000
7 PAR COURSE STATION EA. 1 $6,000.00 $6,000
PAVING TYPES
8 A.C. S.F. 14,378 $1.50 $21,567
9 BOARDWALK S.F. 1,664 $25.00 $41,600
10 SOIL CEMENT S.F. 27,141 $1.00 $27,141
11 ROCK EA. 67 $100.00 $6,700
PLANTING AREAS
12 PREP TO GRADE S.F. 66,369 $0.06 $3,982
13 IRRIGATION S.F. 66,369 $0.50 $33,185
14 RIPARIAN S.F. 48,952 $0.40 $19,581
15 XERISCAPE S.F. 17,417 $0.40 $6,967
TREES
16 LARGE ACCENT TREE EA. 7 $150.00 $1,050
17 SMALL ACCENT TREE EA. 1 $150.00 $150
18 RIPARIAN TREE EA. 58 $150.00 $8,700
19 XERISCAPE TREE EA. 20 $150.00 $3,000
TOTAL $354,082
•
AREA#6 - SOUTH PARK & ISLAND
NO. JITEM UNIT QUAN. JUNIT COST TOTAL COST
1 SITE GRADING L.S. 1 25,000 $251000
2 DRAIN&GRADE UPPER LAKE L.S. 1 50,000 $50,000
3 A.C. S.F. 5,746 $1.50 $8,619
4 FIRE PIT EA. 1 4,000 $4,000
5 LAKE CIRC. SYSTEM(PUMP&EQUIP) EA. 1 60,000 $60,000
PAVING TYPES
6 PAVER S.F. 370 6 $2,220
7 SOIL CEMENT S.F. 8,839 1 $8,839
8 FENCE L.F. 236 $24.00 $5,664
9 GAZEBO L.S. 1 $30,000.00 $30,000
10 ROCK EA. 112 100 $11,200
11 SIGN EA. 1 1,600 $1,600
12 SPILLWAY EA. 1 $6,000.00 $6,000
13 WALL L.F 60 90 $5,400
14 REST ROOMS L.S. 1 40,000 $40,000
15 BRIDGE EA. 1 45,000 $45,000
PLANTING AREAS
16 PREP TO GRADE S.F. 75,968 $0.06 $4,558
17 IRRIGATION S.F. 75,968 $0.50 $37,984
18 LAWN, HYDROSEED S.F. 5,600 $0.12 $672
19 RIPARIAN S.F. 52,123 0 $20,849
20 XERISCAPE S.F. 18,245 0 $7,298
TREES
21 LARGE ACCENT TREE EA. 3 150 $450
22 SMALL ACCENT TREE EA. 3 150 $450
23 RIPARIAN TREE EA. 7 150 $1,050
24 XERISCAPE TREE EA. ill 150 $1,650
TOTAL $378,503
•
AREA#7 - BOTANICAL GARDEN & NATURAL AREA
NO. ITEM UNIT QUAN. UNIT COST TOTAL COST
1 SITE GRADING L.S. 1 $30,000.00 $30,000
2 UTILITES L.S. 1 $25,000.00 $25,000
3 BUILDING EA. 1 $65,000.00 $65,000
PAVING TYPES
4 CONCRETE S.F. 300 $3.50 $1,050
5 SOIL CEMENT S.F. 8,896 1 $8,896
6 A-C. S.F. 8,256 $1.50 $12,384
7 ROCK EA. 47 $100.00 $4,700
PLANTING AREAS
8 BOTANICAL GARDEN/NATURAL AREA S.F. 142,692 $0.40 $57,077
9 PREP TO GRADE S.F. 80,000 $0.06 $4,800
10 IRRIGATION S.F. 80,000 $0.50 $40,000
TREES
11 LARGE ACCENT TREE EA. 3 $150.00 $450
12 WALL ACCENT TREE EA. 2 $150.00 $300
13 RIPARIAN TREE EA. 8 $150.00 $1,200
14 XERISCAPE TREE EA. 12 $150.00 $1,800
TOTAL $252,657
GRAND TOTAL $2,790,685
s