HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 05/28/1991 PUBLIC REVIEW COPY #
PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE
FROM COUNTER
AGE N DA,
ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
ATASCADERO ADMINISTRATION BUILDING
6500 PALMA
FOURTH FLOOR, ROTUNDA ROOM
MAY 28, 1991
7:00 P.M.
This agenda is prepared and posted pursuant to the require-
ments of Government Code Section 54954.2. By listing a topic on
this agenda, the City Council has expressed its intent to discuss
and act on each item. In addition to any action identified in the
brief general description of each item, the action that may be tak-
en shall includes A referral to staff with specific requests for
information; continuance; specific direction to staff concerning
the policy or mission of the item; discontinuance of consideration;`
authorization to enter into negotiations- and execute agreements
pertaining to the item; adoption or approval; and, disapproval
Copies of the staff reports or other documentation` relating to
each item of business referred to on the agenda are on file in the
office of the City Clerk, available for public inspection during
City Hall business hours. The City Clerk will answer any questions
regarding the agenda.
RULES OF PUBLIC PARTICIPATION:
Members of the audience may speak on any item on the agenda.
* A person may speak for five (5) minutes. '
* No one may speak for a second time until everyone wishing to
speak has had an opportunity to do so.
* No one may speak more than twice on any item.
* Council Members may question any speaker; the speaker may
respond but, after the allotted time has expired, may not
initiate further discussion.
* The floor will then be closed to public participation and
open for Council discussion,
Call to Order
Pledge of Allegiance
Roll Call
City Council Comment:
Introduction of Atascadero City Hall Volunteers
Proclamation "Tri-Counties Small Business Opportunity
Day", June 11, 1991
COMMUNITY FORUM:
The City Council values and encourages exchange of ideas and
comments from you, the citizen. The Community Forum period is
provided to receive comments from the public on matters other than
scheduled agenda items. To increase the effectiveness of Community
Forum, the following rules will be enforced:
A maximum of 30 minutes will be allowed for Community Forum,
unless Council authorizes an extension.
* All remarks shall be addressed to Council, as a whole, and
not to any individual member thereof.
* No person shall be permitted to make slanderous, profane or
personal remarks against any Council Member, commissions &
staff.
A. COMMITTEE REPORTS (The following represents ad hoc or standing
committees. Informative status reports will be given, as felt
necessary. ) :
1. S.L.O. Area Coordinating Council/North Coastal Transit
2 Solid/Hazardous Waste Management Committee
3. Recycling Committee
4. Economic Opportunity Commission
5. City/School Committee
6. Traffic Committee
7. Downtown Interim Sign Committee
8. County Water Advisory Board
9. Economic Round Table
10. B.I.A.
11. Colony Roads Committee
B. CONSENT CALENDAR:
All matters listed under Item A, Consent Calendar, are consid-
ered to be routine, and will be enacted by one motion in the form
listed below. There will be no separate discussion on these items.
A member of the Council or public may, by request, have any item
removed from the Consent Calendar, which shall then be reviewed and
acted upon separately after the adoption of the Consent Calendar:
I. MAY 14, 1991 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
2. CONSOLIDATED TREASURER'S REPORT - APRIL, 1991
3. REQUEST TO SEEK BIDS FOR WASTEWATER EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
4. RESOLUTIONNO. 41-91 - ESTABLISHING NEW ROAD NAMES ("PRADO
LANE" AND "CHANDLER LANE") FOR TWO ROADS CURRENTLY NAMED "SAN
RAFAEL COURT" (Road Name Change 01-91)
2
5. RECONSIDERATION OF THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE
TRACT MAP 22-90
6. MODIFICATION OF CONDITION OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
12-89, 10785 EL CAMINO REAL (Colombo/North Coast Engineering)-
7. FISCAL IMPACT MODEL, PHASE II `
8. RESOLUTION NO. 43-91 CREATING A POLICY RELATED TO CAPITAL
PROJECT FUNDING
9. RESOLUTION NO. 44-91 - AUTHORIZING MODIFICATIONS TO AGREEMENTS
WITH JOHN WALLACE & ASSOCIATES REGARDING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PROVIDED FOR THE SYCAMORE ROAD BRIDGE AND THE LEWIS AVENUE
BRIDGE PROJECTS
10. AWARD OF BID #91-6 FOR PERFORMANCE OF ANNUAL WEED ABATEMENT
C. HEARINGSIAPPEARANCES:
1. ANNUAL WEED ABATEMENT - PROTEST HEARING
2. ZONE CHANGE 03-91 (City of Atascadero)
A. Ordinance No. 222 Amending Section 9-3.651 (Establish-
ment of Planned Development Overlay Zone No. 7) of the
Zoning Ordinance by the addition of development standards
(Recommend motion to waive reading in full and approve on
first reading by title only. )
3. URGENCY ORDINANCE UTILITY TRANSMISSION FACILITIES (City
Council-initiated')
A. Ordinance No. 224 An interim ordinance of the Council
of the City of Atascadero amending the Zoning Ordinance
by requiring Conditional Use Permits for the installation
of certain previously allowed utility transmission facil-
ities within residential zones
(Recommend motion to waive reading in; full and adopt on
f irst reading by title only -- Urgency Ordinance requires
a 4/5 vote)
D. REGULAR BUSINESS:
1. REQUEST TO CONSIDER DIAL-A+RIDE EXPANSION - PRESENTATION BY
SLO COUNTY
2. PAVILION PROJECT STATUS REPORT (Verbal)
A. Request to approve Change Order #1
3
3. STATUS REPORT ON THE GREEN WASTE RECYCLINGPROGRAM
4.
REQUEST FOR SUPPLEMENTAL SUPPORT FOR COUNTY'S SPAY/NEUTER PRO-
GRAM
5. PUBLIC WORKS DEFERRED IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS (City Attorney)
6,. PROPOSED CHAMBER 'SIGN ORDINANCE REVISION (Mayor Lilley)
7. SET BUDGET HEARING DATES
E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION ANDIOR ACTION:
1. City Council
2. City Attorney
3. City Clerk
4. City Treasurer
5. City Manager
4
• PROCLAMATION
"TRI-COUNTIES SMALL BUSINESS OPPORTUNITY DAY"
JUNE 11, 1991
WHEREAS, Business enterprise has been a vital part of this
Nation's way of life from its very beginning; and
WHEREAS, Business entrepreneurship in Atascadero, as through-
out California, is the gateway to opportunity for all in the free
enterprise system and the means by which many of us continue to
build a better life for ourselves and our families; and
WHEREAS, Small business provides a special opportunity for
minority business entrepreneurs to enter and succeed in the main-
stream of American economic life; and
WHEREAS, Small business is especially suited to our Atascadero
way of life by virtue of its vitality, scale and minimal demand for
public resources;
WHEREAS, the Tri-Counties Purchasing Outreach Network, cover-
ing Santa Barbara, ,Ventura and San Luis Obispo counties, is:holding
• a Small Business Opportunity Day at the,U.C. Santa Barbara Events
Center on Tuesday, June 11, 1991;
NOW, THEREFORE, I, ROBERT LILLEY, by virtue of the authority
vested in me as Mayor of the City of Atascadero, do hereby proclaim
June 6, 1991 as,
"SMALL BUSINESS_OPPORTUNITIES DAY"
in the City of Atascadero and urge all Atascaderans to recognize
the great achievements and contributions made bysmall business in
our community.
R BERT B. LILL ' , Mayor
City of Atasc ero, >CA
May 15, 1991
Tri-Counties Purchasing Outreach Network
P.O.Box 2207•Goleta,California 93118
i
MAKE IT HAPPEN
March 1, 1991
R E C E I v E
Robert B. Lilley, Mayor
City of Atascadero MAR 1 i99
6500 Palma
Atascadero, CA 93422 CITY MGR.
Dear Mayor Lilley:
The Tri-Counties Purchasing Outreach Network, covering Santa Barbara, Ventura
and San Luis Obispo counties is holding a Small Business opportunity lay
at the University of California Santa Barbara Events Center, June 11, 1991.
The outreach network is a non-profit organization structured to encourage
the growth of small, minority and women-owned businesses in our comities.
A brochure will be included explaining our charter and the corporations
and agencies sponsoring this program.
It would be appreciated if the mayor and city counci ld join our endeavor
and send a letter of proclamation to support the ent. We would
like to include your proclamation in our program to be given to eighty (80)
exhibitors and approximately four hundred (400) guests who will attend the
fair.
The attached registration form for the Small Business opportunity Day Fair
will explain all the details. Also, a copy of a past proclamation is
being forwarded for your information.
Please submit your document to the following address by May 15th:
Mary Weaver
Small Business Administrator
Delco Systems Operations
6767 Hollister Avenue
Goleta, CA 93117
If there are any questions, please contact me at (805) 961-5717,
Sincerely,
DELCO SYSTEMS OPERATIONS
Mary Weaver
Chairperson, Public Relations
Tri-Counties Purchasing
Outreach Network
Attachments
Sponsored by ttte local business communities.
For information Call WS)961-4073 or 961-5717
Tri-Counties Purchasing Outreach Network
1
ADVANCE NOTIFICATION
5TH ANNUAL
SMALL / MINORITY BUSINESS
MAKE IT HAPPEN OPPORTUNITY CONFERENCE
SPONSORS
�
M ti ti ti ti ti ti ti�ti�ti ti ti ti ti ti k k��ti ti��ti ti�ti�ti��ti ti ti ti ti��
U.S. SHALL BUSINESS ADN.-%..^e w.n.ti•�.�.w.•v N n.•�.w.ti w.w.�.�.w.�.N n.N h w.w.•�.w.�.N ti•v N N w..�.N w.N
DEPT.OF DEFENSE-PLA
USAF-'AANWKRB AFB
OXNAN MINORITY BNS. JUNE 11 , 1991
MOMENT CENTER
SANTA BARBARA NINNRITY UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA .
BUS.DEYELOPNENT CENTER
N.C. SANTA BARBARA
ABET AEROSPACE - EVENTS CENTER -
CATA, INC.
CONPOTER SCIENCES
A.J.DIANI CONSTRUCTION
EMONDS TERP SERVICES LUNCHEON SPEAKER
eN OEM SYSMIS
HISNES AIRCM-M t GALE SAYERS — NFL HALL OF FAME, SMALL BUSINESS ENTREPRENEUR +�
LOCXNEED SPACE In
TIE NAMAW CO YOU ARE INVITED TO MEET WITH REPRESENTATIVES OF APPROXIMATELY 100
NANTIN MARIETTA
faffoop CW. CORPORATIONS AND GOVERNMENT AGENCIES SEEKING SMALL AND SMALL
PACIFIC OFFICE INT. DISADVANTAGED SUBCONTRACTORS AND SUPPLIERS.
PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC
PROCTER R BABBLE MORNING AND AFTERNOON PANELS
RAYTHEON ESO
9�AUIFU INTERNAT't
IF.
FDISOR 'HOW TO DO BUSINESS WITH GOVERNMENT AND PRIME CONTRACTORS"
. GAS CO.
TELEDYNE ELECTRONICS
TELEDYNE SYSTEBS
TEXACO NSA
UNISYS CORP.
NNITTARER ELECTRONICS FOR INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT: . J.J. STEWART (805) 865-6489
NORXL INC.
. LAURIE GREEN (805) B93-4073
Please detach and return the bottom portion to receive registration material.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NAMES
COMPANYs
ADDRESS:
MAIL TO: TRI—COUNTIES PURCHASING OUTREACH NETWORK
P.O. BOX 2207
GOLETA, CA 93118
• ATTN: SMALL BUSINESS CONFERENCE •
MEETING AGENDA
DATE-54281.a, . ITEC/ R� �
ATASCADERO CITY COt7NCIL
MINUTES
MAY 14, 1991
A closed session of the City Council was called to order at 6:00
p.m. by Mayor Robert Lilley for discussions relating to personnel
and salary negotiations and to receive a status report regarding
negotiations for purchasing the B.G. Lewis desk. At 7:05 p.m. , the
following motion was made:
MOTION: By CouncilmanDexter, seconded by Councilman Nimmo to
adjourn into open session, motion unanimously carried.
Mayor Lilley asked for a recess of approximately seven minutes. At
7:12 p.m. , he called the regular, open meeting to order. Council-
man Dexter led the Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL
Present: Councilmembers Borgeson, Nimmo, Shiers, Dexter
and Mayor Lilley
Absent: Bone
Also Present: Muriel Korba City Treasurer and Lee Dayka,
City Clerk
Staff Present: Ray Windsor, City Manager, Mary Gayle,
Assistant City Attorney; Mark Joseph,
Administrative Services Director; Henry Engen,
Community Development Director; Greg Luke,
Public Works Director; Andy Takata, Community
Services Director; Bud McHale, Police .Chief
and Rob Malone, Junior Engineer
C Ik CANT:
Councilwoman Borgeson reported that she had received a call from a
constituent regarding the appeal process. He had requested that
Council consider, as an alternative, accepting signatures on a
petition in lieu of the present fee of $100 for appeals.
Mayor Lilley read the proclamation for "California Peace Day", May
19,, 1991.
CC5j14f91
Page 1
P-mesentation &
AtUft ea
Awry Gayle, Assistant City Attorney, acknowledged the presence of
Jalynne Giles, attorney representing Walls Fargo Bank in the matter
of ,establishing ownership of certain "Colony" roads in A.tascadeero.
She gave an overview of the history leading to the current status
and requested Council give her authorisation to continue research.
She reported that she expected she would need an additional forty
to fifty hours to complete the inquiry, but anticipated that she
could have a full report to Council by ; June 34, 1991, at the
latest.
MOTION: By Councilman Dexter, seconded by Councilwoman Borgesaon
to authorize Mary Gayle to proceed with the
investigations she is conducting regarding the iso-called,
"Colony " roads; notion carried 5:0 by roll call vete.
Ms. Gayle noted that although the written report was marked
"Confidential"j, the Council was at liberty to disclose it if they
so chosce.
By comon consensus, the City Council agreedto releases No.
Gayle's report to the public. (Said' report is on file with
the City Clerk) .
Faux:
i
They public was given the: opportunity to speak on matters not on the
agenda. There were no comments.
A. 99MZM URQM (Thee fallowing represents ad hoc or standing
committees. Informative status reports were given, as
follows. ) :
1, S.L.O. Area Coordinating Council./Borth Coastal Transit -
Councilwoman Boigeson reported that the North Coastal
Transit would met on May 15. 3391 in the morning. She
provided an overview of the agenda and recommendations to
made by the North Coastal Transit Authority regarding
dialysis treatment transportation, fixed route and Run-
About services, Route 7 funding distribution and the
operating budget. SLOACC, she explained, would; meet in
the afternoon and would be electing new officers, looking
at transportation funding matters and regional housing
needs. Additionally, Me. Borgeson noted that she was
open to receive comments and would take them with her to
the meeting.
2. Solid/Hazardous Wastes M"agement Committee - Councilman
CC5/14j91
Page 2
Nimmo reported that the committee had met and discussed
the preliminary drafts of the special waste/educa-
tion/public information disposal facility capacity
studies for each of the cities in the County. He also
reported that the committee had recommended approval of
the County's request to increase tipping fees from $1/to
to $3/ton in an effort to cover costs of implementing the
source reduction and recycling elements of AB939.
3. Recycling Committee - Councilman Shiers reported that
this committee had met twice the past month, had elected
new officers and drawn up a budget, were conducting
educational seminars and have established a "recycling
hotline" . He also described results of the pilot "green
waste" pick-up program and indicated that the committee
would be doing a follow-up telephone survey to receive
feedback from participants.
4. Economic Opportunity Commission - Councilman Dexter
related that the board had met on the 16th of May and had
shared concerns regarding the homeless shelter.
5. City/School Committee - Councilman Dexter announced the
next meeting would be on May 25, 1991.
6. Traffic Committee - Councilman Dexter reported that this
committee would be meeting on the following day and would
be addressing seven new items of business.
7. Downtown Interim Sign Committee Mayor Lilley reported
that he would giving a full report later during the
meeting. (See Item D-1)
8. County Water Advisory Board - Councilwoman Borgeson
explained that the board had met and received a
presentation from the Cattlemen' s Association, who had
requested that the community be polled on the issue of
"State water" . She indicated that because the matter was
not on the agenda, no action was taken.
9. Economic Round Table - Mayor Lilley stated that an
"economic retreat" to focus on the tasks of the committee
was being planned. Expenses for this, he explained,
would be absorbed by PG&E, and not by public funds.
B. CONSENT CALENDAR:
The Consent Calendar was presented as follows:
1. APRIL 9, 1991 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
CC5/14/91
Page 3
2. APRIL 23, 1991 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES .
3. GENERAL PLAN CONFORMITY REPORT - CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING
COMMISSION'S REPORT ON ACQUISITION OF STADIUM PARR
4. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 24-88, 8005 SAN GABRIEL - Subdivision of
two lots of 9.35 acres into three parcels containing 2.50,
2.50 and 4.35 acres (Kenney/Stewart)
5. RESOLUTION NO. 36-91 - AUTHORIZING CITY ACCOUNT WITH ORANGE
COUNTY'S INVESTMENT POOL
6. RESOLUTION NO. 38-91 - AUTHORIZING PHASE II OF CRAWFORD, MUL-
TARI & STARR STUDY: FISCAL IMPACT MODEL
7. RESOLUTION NO. 39-91 - APPROVING LEASE/PURCHASE AGREEMENT WITH
VALLEY BANK LEASING FOR THE PURCHASE OF CAPITAL EQUIPMENT
8. RESOLUTION NO. 40-91 - AUTHORIZING PARTICIPATION IN THE GREAT
WESTERN BANK DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN FOR CITY EMPLOYEES
9. RESOLUTION NO. 37-91 - ADOPTING A CITY-WIDE SAFETY PROGRAM,
PURSUANT TO SB 198
10. CHANGE ORDER RE: PARKING LOT, FIRE STATION #1
COMMISSION'S REPORT ON ACQUISITION OF STADIUM PARK
Tom Bench, Atascadero resident, asked that item #A-3 be pulled.
The City Treasurer pulled item #A-6
MOTION: By Councilman Nimmo and seconded by Councilman Dexter to
approve the Consent Calendar, absent items #A-3, and #A-
6; motion carried 5:0 by roll call vote.
3. GENERAL PLAN CONFORMITY REPORT - CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING
Public Comments:
Tom Bench, 7503 Carmelita, commended the Council for considering
the purchase of Stadium Park and indicated that he was supportive.
He added that he hoped the Council did not .pay the full asking
price for the property.
Henry Engen, Community Development Director, pointed out a
correction to the staff report. He clarified that there had been
a prior map submitted that has been withdrawn and that no
consideration is being given for a re-zoning, as referenced.
Ray Jansen, 6655 County Club Drive indicated that he, too, was in
support of the acquisition and urged Council to move to purchase.
CC5/14/91
i Page 4
•
Lindsey Hampton, 8205 Alta Vista, announced that she represented
the Atascadero Land Preservation Society, a non-profit
organization. She read a prepared statement (see Exhibit A)
encouraging swift and decisive action and pledged support for any
fund-raising activities that may be needed in order to acquire the
site for the community.
The City Clerk read a letter of support from Livia Kellerman who
resides at 5463 Honda (see Exhibit B) .
Councilman Dexter asked what commitment would be made if Council
accepts the Planning Commission' s report. The City Manager
indicated that it was a step in a process that Council had already
authorized when they had decided to pursue the matter. An
additional appraisal would be necessary, as well as a future closed
session to make the ultimate decision on how the City would
proceed.
MOTION: By Councilwoman Borgeson and seconded by Councilman
Shiers to accept the Planning Commission' s report finding
that acquisition of Stadium Park by the City of
Atascadero for the purpose of maintaining the property' s
natural state or to ensure that use of the property is
limited to parkland and/or low-intensity recreation would
be consistent with the City's General Plan; motion
carried unanimously by voice vote.
6. RESOLUTION NO. 38-91 - AUTHORIZING PHASE II OF CRAWFORD, MUL-
TARI & STARR STUDY: FISCAL IMPACT MODEL
City Treasurer, Micki Korba, stated that she had some concerns
about the method in which the cost of $22,000 would be charged.
She asked that the matter be postponed until staff had the
opportunity to research whether or not it is legal to charge the
study cost to developer fees. Councilwoman Borgeson noted that she
shared the same concern.
Mark Joseph, Administrative Services Director, responded that a
portion of the first phase study was charged to the developer fees
and that it was found to be an appropriate charge. The full cost
of the second phase, he reported, is being proposed to be charged
to developer fees because the purpose is to analyze the fiscal
impacts of new development. Mr. Joseph explained that the
rationale had not been formally approved by the City Attorney.
The City Manager indicated that the work was not anticipated to
begin for at least one month and suggested that Council continue
the matter until the City Attorney had an opportunity to provide a
memo to clarify the question.
CC5/14/91
Page 5
MOTION: By Councilman Dexter and seconded by Councilwoman
Borgeson to continue the matter subject to receipt of a
memo from the City Attorney; motion carried unanimously.
The Mayor suggested that item #D-2 be advanced. Council concurred.
D. REGULAR BUSINESS•
2. RESOLUTION NO. 39-91 - APPOINTMENT TO FILL VACANCY ON BUILDING
& CONSTRUCTION BOARD OF APPEALS
Henry Engen gave the staff report recommending that Council
appoint, by resolution, Mr. Michael Sherer to the Building and
Construction Board of Appeals.
Councilwoman Borgeson indicated that she believed that Mr. Sherer
was not a licensed general contractor adding that she was not
comfortable with the fact that only one party had applied.
The City Clerk explained the advertising process.
Councilman Dexter remarked that Mr. Sherer' s application stated
that he was a licensed contractor and he indicated that he wanted
clarification whether or not the applicant must be licensed.
Councilman Nimmo asserted that he believed the applicant was
qualified for the job. Councilman Shiers also asked for
clarification on the licensing matter.
i
Public Comment:
Michael Sherer, applicant, explained that he was personally duly
licensed as a general contractor and that his corporation was also
licensed. He further explained that he currently had both licenses
on an inactive status, but that by remitting appropriate fees he
could bring that status to active. He offered to let the Council
examine his pocket State license which he was carrying.
Mayor Lilley pointed out that Ordinance No. 44 establishing the
Board of Appeals did not specify that the contractor must be
licensed.
Councilwoman Borgeson suggested that in the future, applicants be
asked to submit references.
Councilman Dexter indicated that in light of Mr. Sherer' s comments,
he no longer g r had any questions.
MOTION: By Councilman Nimmo, seconded by Councilman Dexter to
adopt the resolution appointing Michael Sherer to the
CC5/14/91
Page 6
• Building and Construction Board of Appeals; motion
carried 3:2 with Councilmembers Shiers and Borgeson
opposing.
C. HEARINGS/APPEARANCES:
1. C.U.P. 01-91 - APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION CONDITIONS OF
APPROVAL TO PERMIT EXPANSION OF ATASCADERO CARD PARLOUR, 5950
EL CAMINO REAL
Henry Engen presented the staff report and recommendation.
Sake Reindersma, applicant' s representative, gave an overview of
the grounds for the appeal. He reported that the applicant felt it
would be a financial hardship to hire a graphics designer to devise
the card parlour' s sign. Additionally, the applicant objected to
the mandate of removing a storage building currently located to the
rear of the property. He asked that parking requirements be met in
another manner.
Mr. Engen clarified that an architect was accepted as a graphics
designer.
Brief Council comments followed. Mayor Lilley stated that the City
must strive for more well-organized parking. Councilwoman Borgeson
asserted that she did not believe the parlour was an appropriate
use in the downtown. Councilman Shiers also concurred with the
Planning Commission' s conditions regarding parking, noting that the
change in occupancy had triggered the increase in parking.
Councilman Dexter remarked that the applicant should meet the new
conditions.
MOTION: By Councilwoman Borgeson and seconded by Councilman
Dexter to deny the appeal and uphold the Planning
Commission' s Findings and Conditions of Approval; motion
unanimously carried.
2. SAN MARCOS ROAD EXTENSION - TREE REMOVAL REQUEST (cont'd from
2/26/91)
Mr. Engen presented the staff report but noted that the applicant
had withdrawn and there was now nothing to appeal.
Councilman Shiers stated that the appeal fee should be returned to
the applicant. Councilwoman Borgeson agreed.
Councilman Nimmo referred to staff' s recommendation to require an
environmental impact report on the original application and
asserted that he would not vote to require an EIR. He then asked
for clarification of the recommended action and whether or not it
CC5/14/91
Page 7
would be to advise staff to require an EIR on any future
submission. The mayor emphasized that Council would not be taking
such action. Mary Gayle concurred.
MOTION: By Councilman Shiers and seconded by Councilwoman
Borgeson to refund the appeal fee to the appellant, Joan
O'Keefe; motion carried.
ACTION ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM:
The City Manager asked Council to put on record action taken during
the closed session relating to the E.G. Lewis desk.
MOTION: By Councilwoman Borgeson and seconded by Councilman
Shiers to authorize the purchase, subject to a confirming
appraisal, of E.G. Lewis' desk under the terms outlined
as follows: ( 1) payment of one-third down ($4,333.33) ,
(2) authorize six payments, over six months, of $1,444.45
per month and (3) authorize staff to work with a
community fundraising effort to pay one-half ($722. 12) of
each month' s payment. If this amount is not raised, then
the matter is to be brought back to the City Council;
motion unanimously carried 5:0 by roll call vote.
Councilwoman Borgeson reported that the desk was especially lovely
and was of historic significance to the community because it had
belonged to the founder of Atascadero. She further indicated that
she would head up fund raising efforts to help subsidize the
purchase.
At 8:50 p.m. Mayor Lilley called for a recess. The meeting recon-
vened at 9:10 p.m.
Mayor Lilley noted the presence of Joan O'Keefe who asked if she
and others present could comment on the previous appeal matter
relating to San Marcos Road extension. The mayor responded that
the item, because of the applicant' s withdrawal, was not before the
Council.
D. REGULAR BUSINESS:
1. DOWNTOWN INTERIM SIGN COMMITTEE REPORT (Mayor Lilley)
Mayor Lilley recognized other members of the Downtown Interim Sign
Committee and gave an extensive presentation regarding signage in
the Atascadero Colony Business District. The mayor acknowledged
the presence of Rob Malone, Junior Engineer, who had prepared
drawings depicting a proposed 1920 ' s theme with a variety of
coordinating awning ning and sign designs in a matching color scheme.
Further, Mayor Lilley reported that conceptual approval for a
CC5/14/91
Page 8
financial/loan program had been given by both Mid State Bank and
Santa Lucia Bank.
Mayor Lilley made the following recommendations: ( 1) to direct
staff to develop a separate ordinance for the Atascadero Colony
Business District (downtown) and bring the matter to public hearing
before the Planning Commission and (2) to prepare a booklet to
distribute to business owners in the downtown describing the
proposal in an effort to receive their input. He then polled the
Council to determine if there was support.
Brief, favorable Council comments followed.
Public Comments:
Whitey Thorpe, 8205 Santa Ynez, remarked that he liked the concept.
Eric Greening, 7365 Valle, indicated that he thought the color
scheme to be tasteful and suggested that if Stadium Park becomes a
community gathering site, that the theme be incorporated to invite
and encourage shopping in the downtown.
MOTION: By Councilwoman Borgeson, seconded by Councilman Dexter
to direct staff to develop an ordinance to implement the
downtown plan as proposed by the Downtown Interim Sign
Committee and to prepare a brochure to illustrate and
describe the program; motion unanimously carried.
2. RESOLUTION NO. 39-91 - APPOINTMENT TO FILL VACANCY ON BUILDING
& CONSTRUCTION BOARD OF APPEALS
See pages 5 & 6.
E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION:
City Attorney
Mary Gayle requested a closed session for the purpose of conferring
with legal counsel, pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 (a) ,
regarding litigation entitled, O'Keefe v. City of Atascadero. In
addition, she indicated that, pursuant to Government Code Section
54956.9(b) ( 1) , said closed session would also address matters
relating to litigation regarding John Wallace & Associates.
City Clerk
The Clerk gave a brief report on her attendance at the 1991 Annual
Conference of the California City Clerks ' Association held during
the week of April 22-26. In addition, she reported that her office
had been relocated to Room 208, second floor of City Hall.
CC5/14/91
Page 9
City Treasurer
Ms. Borba reported that she had attended the California Municipal
Treasurers ' Annual Conference on April 21 & 22 in Palm Springs.
Additional Public Comment:
John Himes, President of the B.I.A. , reported that two more trees
had been purposely broken in the downtown area and announced that
the B.I.A. was offering a $250 reward in an effort to stop needless
vandalism.
MOTION: By Councilman Nimmo and seconded by Councilman Shiers to
adjourn, per the Assistant City Attorney's request, to
closed session for discussions relating to two matters of
pending litigation; motion unanimously carried.
OPEN SESSION ADJOURNED AT 9:54 P.M.
MOTION: By Councilwoman Borgeson, seconded by Councilman Shiers
to move back into open session and adjourn the meeting;
motion unanimously passed.
MEETING ADJOURNED AT 10:41 P.M.
MINUTES RECORDED AND PREPARED BY:
LEE DAYKA, City Clerk
Attachments: Exhibit A (Hampton)
i
Exhibit B (Kellerman)
CC5f14/91
Page 10
CC5/14/91
From: Livia Keiiermar.
EXHIBIT B
5403 Honda, Atascadero � E C
ill; Ill
To: Members of the City Council l„"���
CITY CLERK
A "iGwlnb town needsg121e. 2ht kinds of recreational open -p. . c O
meet deferent needs. We have been very lucky, and wise, to ha,.'t_ set
..sae A;.a,=.cader o Lake with its water- a , ivite ,, picnic area and Zoo,
Heilman Park with i.ts golf course and picnicing, and Paloma Creek Park
with its play area, baseball and soccer fields.
We now have as opp r!uAjy to enrich our park system further by
adding Stadium Park. We enrich it because Stadium Park is part of the
history of Atascadero. It also would be a unique park due to its natural
ampitheater configuration. It would lend itself to outdoor chamber music
concerts. In fact that was one of its historical uses, as well as
weddings, dances, shows-, archery events; the possibilities are
unlimited.
People in other areas pay lots of money to create what we naturally
have. chink of the outdoor plays in Solvang and other places.
Since the park is close to downtown it would encourage people to
walk from downtown to the pari:. Events could be created to encourage just
that.
What we have is irreplaceable. Please do not let it be another
thing we are starry we let go. Allowing it to be divided up for homes is
easy. Keeping it as a park and having, it as a unique contribution to our
area takes Visi y . P1caSe have that vision, and vote to buy the park.
Thank you. __.__
CC5/14/91
EXHIBIT A
7Y
To the Atascadero City Council i
r. ASOADZRO •
C'?`.'d Lc
I am ::peaking as a repre:�entative of the Atascadero Lan .rRKre-
ervation society, a newly organized, non--arofit corporation dedi-
cated to preserving open space through purchase or donation of land.
We support staff's recommendation to acquire Stadium Park in
order to maintain it in its natural jtate, or to use it as parkland,
or for low-intensity recreation.
Few cities have the opportunity to purchase 26 acres of scenic oak
woodland within walking distance of its downtown. Now is the time to
ourchase Stadium 'Dark, before it is lost to development.
We encourage the city council to take swift and decisive action
on this item. historically, the dream of Stadium Park has withstood the
test of time and has consistently been included in the County's and
City's General-T=-lans. 0
Although we realize the city has other recreational needs,
4-i r#IA-
this may be the city's last opportunity to fulfill a long-t,eY-n vision.
Because of the great benefit to be derived by the acquisition of -stadium
Park, the Atascadero Land r,reservation .society pledger its support
to assist the city in rai6ing funds for the project.
sincerGly,
/:."°4' ��
MEETING AGENDA
DATE512$L(jL REMI .$_L ..�.
CITY OF ATASCADERO
CASH ACTIVITY SUMMARY
TREASURER'S REPORT
FOR THE MONTH OF APRIL 1991
BEGINNING CASH RESOURCES $7,935,044.84
ADDa
RECEIPTS $1,612,354.00
LESS:
DISBURSEMENTS $704,436.00
OTHER TRANSFERS/MISC.`ADJUSTMENTS $115,404.03
ENDING CASH RESOURCES 47,827,564.81
FUND 501—CONSTRUCTION FUND
(A) (B) REMAINING
TYPE OF REVENUE OR EXPENSE COUNCIL ACTUAL REVENUE ENCUMBRANCES TOTAL (A+B) FUND_
AUTHORIZED OR (EXPENSE) BALANCE '
0ND PROCEEDS 2,000,000.00 2,080,000.06 0.08 2,000,000.00 2.800,000.00
4TEREST EARNINGS 80,000.00 85,000.00 0.08 85,000.00 2,085,090.09
CLOSING COSTS (110,000.80) (109,078.08) 0.00 (109,078.00) 1,975,92.7.00
FUND RESERVE (194,000.60) (194,800.08) 0.00 (194,000.09) 1,781,922.00
-POLICE FACILITY (19356,000.80) (1,345,472.00) (11,000.00) (5,356,472.00) 423,450.00
PAVILLIOH—PHASE I (218,900.00) (217,302.42) (1,507.58) (218,960.00) 206,550.00
----------- ------------- ----------- --- -- --- ---------•_..--
BALANCE AVAILABLE=PAVILLION PHASE II 207,100;00 219,147.58 (12,597.58) 206 --
06,550.00 -06 550.00
FUND 301—TREE PLANTING TRUST
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 13,398.95 13,390.95 0.09 13,390.95 13,390.95
ADD: REVENUES—YEAR TO DATE 8.00 22.15 0.06: 32.15 13,413.10
LESS: EXPENDITURES—YEAR TO DATE (8,248.00) (8,248.80) 0.00 (8,248.00) 51165.10
------------ --------�----
------------- ---------
---_L--_-----
BALANCE AVAILABLE-TREE PLANTING TRUST 5,142.95 5,165.10 0.90 5,165.10 5,165.10
i
•
CITY OF ATASCADERO
TREASURER'S REPORT '
SCHEDULE OF CASH AND INVESTMENTS
AS OF APRIL 1991
_ _
Origination Maturity Interest rMonthisInterest
Name Amount Date Date Rate Interest Yr-to-Date
_ __-__ _-7,338,000.69 N/A_ __
L.A.S.F, _-N/AM �7.66X +139,001.30 x486,326.94
Century Federal Savings 99,000.60 10116/90 10/11/91 8.459 726.36 3,580.65
Mid State.Hank 369,714.81 N/A N/A 5.41X 1,432.96 7,676.32
Petty Cash 956.00r N/A- N/A N/A N/A M/A
TOTALS 7,827,564.81 141,174.62 417,883.91
Keys' N/A (Not Appicabla)
L.A.I.F Interest Paid Quarterly
I certify that this report reflects all Governmental Agency pooled
investments and is in conformitywith the Investment Policy of
the City of Atascadero as stated in Resolution No. 126-90 dated
12/11/96. A copy of this Resolution is available at the Office
of the City Clerk. The Investment Program herein shown provides
sufficient cash flaw liquidity to meet next month's estimated
expenditures.
SIGNED:
Muriel^Korba, City Treasurer
•
•
CONSOLIDATED TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE PERIOD ENDING
APRIL 30, 1991 PREPARED: 05/22/91
I. SCHEDULE OF CURRENT MONTH ACTIVITY AND PRIOR YEAR VARIANCES
APRIL ADJUST- NET CURRENT PRIOR PCT.
DESCRIPTION 1991 MENTS APRIL YR-TO-DATE YR-TO-DATE VAR.
REVENUE
---------------------
Property Taxes 594,345 594,345 1,936,521 1,925,879 0.6%
Sales Tax 121,600 121,600 1,40,329 1,446,889 -1.8%
Red Tax 19,476 19,476 72,555 111,767 -35. 1%
Prop. Transfer Tax 3, 125 3, 125 34,789 36,743 -5.3%
Franchise Fees 188,212 188,2 1 326,969 304,45 7.5%
Special Assessments 49,042 49,042 133,895 118,3S9 13. 1%
Business Licenses 2,003 2,003 71,504 72, 157 -0.9%
Building Permits 36,070 36,070 275,413 322,921 -14.7%
Motor Vehicle Tax 72,535 72,535 685,822 67,800 1.9%
Cigarette Tax 855 855 32,693 34,941 -6.4%
Other State In-Lieu 0 0 31,262 6,025 418.9%
Gas Tax Receipts 32, 167 32, 167 301,477 237,355 27.0%
TDA Receipts 0 0 100,596 10,570 851.7%
Other Intergov'al 16, 158 16, 158 514,704 274,067 87.8%
Recreation Fees 19,533 �
� 19,X33 240,466 177,244 40.2%
Zoo Admissions 6,399 6,399 49,521 57,389 --13.2%
Planning Fees 10,350 10,350 1.12,691 152,278 -26.0%
Wastewater Fees 202,908 202,908 666,659 559,325 19.2%
Development Fees 72,554 72,554 380,256 536, 130 -29. 1%
Dial-A-Ride Fares 3,252 3,252 29,331 30,001 -2.2%
Police Services 408 408 4,788 4,665 2.6%
Weed Abatement 9,894 9,894 39, 159 36,527 7.2%
Other Fees/Charges 51 51 3,820 13,636 -72.0
Fines & Forfeits 8,924 8,924 65,880 36,204 82.0%
Interest Earnings 141, 176 141, 176 452,555 410,527 10.2%
Rentals 841 841 7,456 8,382 -11.0%
Proceeds from Sales 6,501 6,501 128,688 1,751,062 -92.7%.
Miscellaneous (6,648) (6,648) 43,014 292,278 -85.3%
-------------- --- -------;�.--;----..-._ --- -----.�.-.0--
TOTALS 1,611,731 0 1, 611,731 8 171 146 9,640,396 15.2%
EXPENDITURES
General Gov't 28,2334 0 25,23344 235,434 1S3,322 28.4%
Police 155,6ee 0 155,3600 1, 654,74001 1,512,512 9.4%
Fire 96,SS7 0 96,887 902,85E 801,364 12.7%
Public Works 96,721 0 96,721 1, 008,061 711,958 41.6%
Community Dev'ment 62,664 0 629664 605,577 556,590 3.2%
Community Services 147,576 0 147,576 1,490,626 1., 1.45,553 30. 1%
Admin. Services 35,464 0 35,464 645,516 601,471. 7.3%
Non-Departmental 15,896 0 15,896 454,944 226,770 1.00.6%
Major Capital 65,300 0 65,300 1,07.7,3381.1 045 --49.0%
Debt Service/Trust 0 0 0 204,500 � 153,621 2•
-.`V._._---..-_.--_----- �•
-- ---.-.'`-- ---- ------------------
-.-...--ry---; --..----.-.--
TOTALS 704,430 0 704,430 0,279,602 682 S 035 -06 3.0%
• •
(findlr,wk3) [were= 1
•
CONSOLIDATED TREASURER' S REPORT FOR THE PERIOD ENDING
APRIL 30, 1991 PREPARED: 05/22/91
II. BUDGET-TO-ACTUAL REPORT
CURRENT CURRENT PCT. PRIOR PRIOR PCT.
DESCRIPTION BUDGET YR-TO-DATE SPENT BUDGET YR-TO-DATE SPENT
REVENUES
Property Taxes 2,050,000 1,936,521 94.5% 1,843,600 1,925,879 104.5%
Sales Tax 1,850,000 1,420,329 76.8%. 1,655,000 1,446,889 87.4%
Bed Tax 110,000 72,585 66.0% 108,000 111,767 103.5%
Prop. Transfer Tax 60,000 34,789 58.0% 60,000 36,743 61.2%
Franchise Fees 330,000 326,969 99. 1% 306,900 304,245 99. 1%
Special Assessments 151,753 133,898 88.2% 153,453 118,389 77.2%
Business Licenses 105,010 71,504 68. 1% 95,030 72, 157 75.9%
Building Permits 381,575 275,413 72.2% 260,000 322,921 124.2%
Motor Vehicle Tax 860,000 685,822 79.7% 810,000 672,800 63. 1%
Cigarette Tax 35,000 32,693 93.4% 48,600 34,941 71.9%
Other State In-Lieu 60,900 31,262 51.3% 42,400 6,025 14.2%
Gas Tax Receipts 393, 100 301,477 76.7% 267,000 237,355 82.7%
TDA Receipts 402,521 100,596 25.0% 393,403 10,570 2.7%
Other Intergov'al 455,700 514,704 112.9% 366,410 274,067 74.8%
Recreation Fees 310,850 248,466 79.9% 168,350 177,244 105.3% •
Zoo Admissions 71,000 49,821 70.2% 58,000 57,389 98.9'/.
Planning Fees 192,612 112,691 58.5% 126,000 152,278 120.9%
Wastewater Fees 660,200 666,659 101.0% 671, 150 559,325 83.3%
Development Fees 562,600 380,256 67.6% 2,567,000 536, 130 20. 9%
Dial-A-Ride Fares 34,000 29,331 86.3% 32,000 30,001 93.8%
Police Services 4,800 4,788 99.8% 4,526 4,665 103. 1%
Weed Abatement 30,000 39, 159 130.5% 25,000 36,527 146. 1%
Other Fees/Charges 3,000 3,820 127.3% 3,000 13.,636 454.5%
Fines & Forfeits 81,550 65,880 80.8% 69,723 36,204 51.9'x:
Interest Earnings 389, 150 452,555 116. 3% 382,500 410,527 107.3%
Rentals 14,200 7,456 52.5% 16,900 8,382 49.6%
Proceeds from Sales 68,500 128,688 187.9% 1,852,000 1,751,062 94. 5%
Miscellaneous 19,430 43,014 221.4% 447, 175 292,278 65.4%
--------------------------------------•-------------------------
TOTALS 9,687,451 8, 171, 146 84.3% 12,853, 120 9,640,396 75. 0%
EXPENDITURES
General Gov't 286,225 235,434 82.3% 268, 673 183,322 68.2%
Police 2,053,318 1, 654,740 00. 6'x: 1, 899, 119 1,512,512 79.6%
Fire 1, 164,492 902,858 77.5% 1, 107,006 801,364 72. 4%
Public Works 1,578,988 1, 008,061 63.8% 984,061 711,958 72. 3%
Community Dev'Tient 795,689 605,577 76.1% 763,415 5S6,590 76.8%
Community Services 1, 841,241 11490,626 81. 0% 1,636,62S 1, 145,55.3 70. 0%.
Admin. Services 706,075 645,516 91. 4% 823,729 601,471 73.0%
Non-Departmental 643,893 454,944 70. 7% 571,988 226,770 39. 6%
Major Capital 2, 675, 920 1,077,338 40. 3% 6,477,215 2, 112,045 02.6%
Debt Service/Trust 762,474 204,58S 26. 8% 520,316 153,621 29. 1*,,.
---------------------------------------- -------------------- ---
TOTALS 12,508,315 8,279,682 66. 2% 15,060, 150 8, 035,206 53. 4%
(findir.wk3) mace 2
•
CONSOLIDATED TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE PERIOD ENDING
APRIL 30, 1.991 PREPARED: 05/22/91
I Mark Joseph, do hereby certify that the above information is accurate
and reflects the City's financial conditions for the periods specified.
However, the information in these reports is unaudited, and may therefore
be subject to future revisions.
Mark Joseph, F anc Director
MEMO TO: City Council
FROM: Muriel Korba , City Treasurer
. DATE: May 22, 1991
SUBJECT: NOTES TO TREASURER' S REPORT
1 . On 5/21/91 , $6, 000, 000 was wired from L. A. I. F. to Orange
County Investment Fund . ,
2. The Bank of New York Trust Company of California Trustee
for the City of Atascadero, Police Headquarters & Park
Pavilion Project Certificates of Participation is holding
$199, 606. 68 in reserve funds. These funds are in the process
of being deposited in the Orange County Investment Pool.
MK/sr
�
�
�
� .
��r ��
REPORT TO COUNCIL Meeting Date: 5/28/91
CITY OF ATASCADEROAgenda Item: B-3
THROUGH: Ray Windsor, City ,Manager
FROM: Greg Luke, Director of Public Works
SUBJECT:
Wastewater contingency fund expenditure request
RECOMMENDATION:
Proceed with the issuance of bid requests for the replacement
of equipment associated with lift station 4.
BACKGRQUND:
Lift station 4, located on Capistrano, has been in service for
thirteen years. No specifications, or manuals` exist for this
station thus maintenance has been minimal. On March 20th the pumps
in lift station 4 ceased to function. The submersible pumps in this
station are of an obsolete `'design. 'Being bolted to the bottom of
the wet well, the pumps cannot be easily withdrawn creating a
situation where repairs and maintenance must be performed ,in a
hazardous confined space while the flow to the station is
physically blocked.
At the present time, the sewage in lift station 4 is
temporarily being pumped with a small, suspended, portable pump.
DISCUSSION:
The non-functioning, inferior ,equipment in lift station 4
should be replaced with equipment identical to the equipment used
in pump station 7' which is one of the city's newest' pumping
stations. Not only will this repair and upgrade station 4 but it
will also help in the standardization of pump station equipment
which will aid in efficient repair and maintenance. To rely, for an.
extended period of time, on the pump which is temporarily being
employed in lift station 4 is unacceptable. This lift station is in
desperate need of new equipment.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Approximately $50, 000 from the 1990-91 wastewater contingency
fund.
i
RRPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
CITY Of ATASCADZRO Item NO: B-4
•
Through: Ray Windsor, City Manager Meeting Date: 512`8191
File No: RNC 01-91'
Via: Henry Engen, Community Development Director
From: op Steven L. DeCamp, City Planner
UBJZCT:
Establishment of new road names for two (2) roads currently named
"San Rafael Court . "
RNCONMNDATION:
Adopt Resolution #41-91 establishing the road names "Chandler
Lane" and "Prado Lane" in the locations shown on the exhibit
<`attached to the resolution.
BACKGROUND
The Planning Commission held public hearings on April 2 and May
7, 1991 regarding the establishment of new road names for two of
the three "San Rafael Courts" currently in existence. Minute
excerpts from the two hearings are attached along with the staff
reports :
ANALYSIS:_
The name "Prado Lane" (meaning meadow) was recommended by staff
and found to be acceptable to the affected residents and the
PlanningCommission. ' "Chandler Lane" (the name of the original
owner of the property) was selected by the residents of the
second "San Rafael Court" and was approved by the Planning
Commission. Both 'names were reviewed and approved by the City' s
Police and Fire Departments as well as by the Post Master.
Finally, both 'names were found by the Planning Commission to be
consistent with the "Policy Statement #l" regarding the naming of
roads within Atascadero.
ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A Resolution No. 41-91
Attachment B - Policy Statement #1'
Attachment C - Staff Report : April 2,' 1991
Attachment D - Staff Report : May 7, 1991
Attachment E - Minute Excerpts : April 2, '1991
Attachment F' - Minute Excerpts: May 7, 1991
ATTACHMENT A
RESOLUTION NO. 41-91
RESOLUTION OF THE ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL RENAMING TWO STREETS TO
-PRADO LANE AND CHANDLER LANE
WSE
RLA�S
f to Government Code Section 34091..1 establishes authority: .
for cities
designate or`chan a the name of cit streets; and
g_ g y ,
WHEREAS, there are three streets in the City of Atascadero, that
all use the name San Rafael Court; and
WNkREAS, the City Community Services Department has requested
that at least two of these roads be renamed to facilitate
emergency and public access; and
WSERRAS, the City Police and Fire Departments have concurred that
the existing situation poses a potentially serious threat to
human health and safety; and
WHEREAS, the Atascadero Postmaster and City Police and Fire
Departments have assisted in ensuring that the proposed new road
names will not duplicate or be easily confused with any other
existing road names; and
WSERSAS, on April 2, 1991 and May 7, 1991, the Planning
Commission conducted a public hearing on 'the' matter of renaming
two of these roads` to Prado Lane and Chandler Lane, as 'shown on
the attached Exhibit A; and
WSERRAS, the City 'Council 'held a public hearing on May 28, 1991
to consider this matter.
ROW, TMMFORN, the Atascadero City Council does resolve,
declare, determine andorderas follows:
Section 1.
The City Council finds that the granting of the request will
contribute to an orderly system for street naming.
Section; 2
The City Council of the City of Atascadero hereby approves the
request and establishes the street names of Prado Lane and
• Chandler Lane, as indicated on the attached Exhibit A. i
I
I
Page Two
• Resolution No. 41-91
Section 3.
The City Clerk is directed to transmit a certified copy of this
resolution to the Board of Supervisors of San Luis Obispo County.
On motion by Councilperson and seconded by
Councilperson , the foregoing resolution is
hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
DATE ADOPTED:
By:
• ROBERT LILLEY, Mayor
• City of Atascadero, Calif.
ATTEST:
LEE DAYKA, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
RAY WINDSOR, City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ARTHER MONTANDON, City Attorney
PREPARED BY:
HENRY ENGEN,
Community Development Director
CITY OF RTAS CAD ER
O EXHIBIT A
: - CONLNfTNI7 y DEVELOPMENT Resolution No. 41-91
0 EPART."Y E.N7
�1
R S--T'
's � \
Change from R\&I
San Rafael Court
/ to 1
Chandler Lane
S41 v
Q.
c JTA J �Ov
from
MChange s
g
Op !ST � \ i \ .
/ �,/ San Rafael Court
to
40, Prado Lane
OS !�
_ Y
\ AOA p /
0 � \
OL SOy�/P
CITY OF AT_AS CAD ER
O
COLYLNIVNITt DENMOPNI'Eyr ATTACHMENT B
D E?AR'I..ENT
sendez/o
INCORPORATED JULY 2, 1979
POLICY STATEMENT NO. 1
SUBJECT: Road Names
The City of Atascadero does hereby establish the following.
policies regarding the naming of roads :
1. All road names shall be of Spanish origin or shall
be the names of non-living persons of historical
import.
• 2 . Road names shall not be duplicative of nor similar
to other road names within- the City of Atascadero or
in the nearby unincorporated areas of San Luis Obisco
County. -
3. The establishment of a new road name or the changing
of an old road name to a new one shall require the
approval of the Planning Commission and City Council.
4. Road name requests shall be initiated by a petition
of the majority of property owners along the affected
road or by the City of Atascadero.
•
ATTACHMENT C
MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 2, 1991
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Gary V. Raiser, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: Road Name Change -- RN #01-91
Establishment of Milagro Lane and Prado Lane
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends: (1) changing the name of the San Rafael Court
nearest to Morro Road to Milagro Lane; (2) changing the San
Rafael Court located approximately five-hundred feet south of the
above road to Prado Lane; and (3) making no such name change to
the San Rafael Court on the east side of Highway 101, opposite
the State Hospital.
ANALYSIS:
There are presently three (3) different streets that all use the •
name "San Rafael Court" (Exhibit A) . One of these streets is
located on the east side of Highway 101, opposite E1 Camino Real
from the Atascadero State Hospital. The other two of these
streets are short extensions, or cul-de-sacs, off of San Rafael
Road, -- one is approximately 1,500 feet south of the junction of
San Rafael Road with San Gabriel Road, and the other is
approximately 21000 feet south of said intersection.
There are presently six (6) single-family residential lots served
by each of the San Rafael Courts nearest the intersection of San
Rafael and San Gabriel Roads. The San Rafael Court on the east
side of
Highway 101 currently serves eightht (8) lots, all of which
are zoned
for high-density g ensity multiple family use.
The present situation is not only confusing, but has the
potential to result in serious problems with respect to providing
emergency services to the .people residing on these streets.
Review of this matter by emergency services personnel, namely the
City Police and Fire Departments, confirms that the present
situation should be remedied without further delay. Finally, the
Fire Department has requested that the new road names be
dissimilar to each other, and distinct from any other existing
roads.
In attempting to develop new road names, staff carefully
considers ( 1) whether a given name would be difficult to spell or
• pronounce; (2) the sound of the name when spoken; ( 3) the meaning
of the word; and (4) whether a given road name could easily be
confused with any other existing road names. In addition, staff
strives for consistency with the County of San Luis Obispo' s Road
Classification Chart, which establishes standard road name
suffixes (Road, Street, Avenue, Boulevard, etc. ) .
According to Cassell ' s Spanish Dictionary, Milagro means
"miracle, " and Prado means "meadow" . Besides being dissimilar to
each other, these names are pleasant sounding, relatively easy to
spell and pronounce, and would not closely resemble any other
existing street names in Atascadero. The proposed suffix, Lane,
comes from the aforementioned classification chart for cul-de-
sacs in excess of 200 feet in length.
ATTACHMENTS:
Exhibit A -- Location Map
•
CITY OF RTAS CAD ER O
EXIiIBIT A
,. CONi�tiILTtITY 0EVEL0P:tiiENI' Locations Map
D EPA M6 ENI' RN #01-91
CR r
Sv
T
� c
4 �
�r4
�FAVE AS IS
c�
1
tiHts erg To .
M«A6Ec L,ai.�E
4ti
1�� CtSA�6E' "PENS
�f i i� RA FIDE t.
10
PU0O LA tAS
0
IST��
i
SOS / •
ROAD
ATTACHMENT D
•
MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 7, 1991
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Gary V. Kaiser, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: Road Name Change #41-91
BACKGROUND:
The Planning Commission considered the above subject at its April
2, 1991 meeting. Attached is the staff report prepared for that
meeting (Attachment B) .
The Commission will recall that individuals residing on the
streets proposed to be renamed appeared at the meeting in
protest. Based on this public testimony, it appeared that the
need to correct the present confusion from an emergency services
perspective was recognized by all involved. However, the protest
• was in regard to the particular names recommended by staff.
Specifically, the name "Milagro" was deemed by the residents
difficult to pronounce.
The Commission continued the matter until its May 7, 1991
meeting, and directed staff to work with the residents to arrive
at mutually acceptable road names.
A list consisting of five (5) additional names has been
developed. Each of the names has been referred to the City
Police Department, the- City Fire Department and the Atascadero
Postmaster to ensure that no duplication or other potential
confusion would result. The proposed names, and responses of
consulted agencies, are as follows:
1. CHANDLER LANE -- The name "Chandler" is preferred by the
affected residents. Although no objecting comments were
received from consulted agencies, the Planning Commission
would have to find this name to be consistent with the
espoused City policy regarding road names (Attachment A) .
2. MESETA LANE -- According to Cassell ' s Spanish Dictionary,
the word "meseta" means "table land" or "plateau. " None of
the consulted agencies expressed discontent with this name.
3. REGATO LANE -- According to Cassell' s Spanish Dictionary,
• the word "regato" means "rivulet" or "brook. " None of the •
consulted agencies expressed discontent with this name.
4. ESTRELLA LANE -- According to Cassell ' s Spanish Dictionary,
the word "estrella" means "star" or "star-wheel. " All three
consulted agencies indicated that this name could easily be •
confused with existing Estrada and Entrada Avenues. The
Postmaster further warned that Estrella is used as a street
name in either Templeton or the City of Paso Robles.
5. CERVEZA LANE -- According to Cassell' s Spanish Dictionary,
the word "cerveza" means "beer" or "ale. " Although none of
the consulted agencies indicated a possible conflict with
existing road names, the Police Department was clearly not
pleased with this particular entry.
CONCLUSIONS:
Staff recommends the expansion of the original recommendation to
include any of the above names with the exceptions of "Estrella"
and "Cerveza. " With respect to the name "Chandler", staff
recognizes that it is most favored by the affected residents;
however, staff does not believe that it is consistent with the
City' s policy for road names, as contained in Attachment A.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment A -- Policy Statement No. 1 -- Road Names
Attachment B -- April 2, 1991 staff report •
ATTACHMENT E
PAGE TWO PC 4/2/91 - MINUTES EXCERPT
• 2. ROAD NAME CHANGE 01-91:
Application filed by the City of Atascadero to (1) change
the name of the San Rafael Court nearest to Morro Road to
Milagro Lane; (2) change the name of the San Rafael Court
located approximately five hundred feet south of the
above road to Prado Lane.
Mr. Kaiser presented the staff report on this matter.
Paul Washburn, 8250 San Rafael, noted that all six property
owners from the 1st cul-de-sac (from Morro Road) are present
for this hearing. He concurred with the City' s concern adding
that visitors also have encountered difficulties in locating
their homes. Mr. Washburn remarked that this road name change
will result in costs and inconvenience (regarding mail
problems, etc. ) ; but may be outweighed by the ability of
emergency vehicles to readily locate a potential problems . He
stated that the residents are opposed to the proposed name
"Milagro" and would like to provide input in naming their
street; but were unprepared at this time as they had received
notice a few days earlier. Mr. Washburn then responded to
questions from the Commission.
Commissioner Johnson asked it there is an urgency in making
this name change now or would it be possible to allow the
• residents some additional time to submit proposed road names
within a week for the City' s consideration. Mr. DeCamp
concurred that it would make sense for the residents to have
an opportunity to provide road names, but this needs to be
done in enough time so the public safety organizations can
review the proposed names as well.
Virginia Orcutt-Clenard, 8280 San Rafael, said she called the
residents living on the other San Rafael Court (Prado) and
added that the neighborhood is not quite as cohesive but
thinks they probably would like the opportunity to be able to
come to a general agreement on a name. She stated that the
one person she spoke with said they would support the other
neighborhood.
Commissioner Highland commented that there should be a policy
to elicit public input before road name changes are proposed.
Discussion continued.
In response to query by Commissioner Highland, Mr. DeCamp
clarified that it has only been in recent years that road
names have become a requirement for subdivisions of this type.
In answering Chairperson Luna' s question, Mr. DeCamp noted
that it is General Plan policy which requires that a street or
• road name be of either Spanish origin or the name of a
deceased person of historical significance. He added that the is
PAGE THREE PC 4/2/91 - MINUTES EXCERPT
public safety agencies were concerned with having a unique
name for each of these "San Rafael" steet names. .
Chairperson Luna and Commissioner Lochridge concurred with the
proposed road names staff has suggested.
Commissioner Lochridge expressed concern with the possibility
of a liability problem (since the City has identified the
problem only to delay it 30 more days) . He added he could
support a 30 day delay but no more.
MOTION: By Commissioner Lochridge, seconded by Commissioner
Johnson and carried 7:0 to continue the hearing on
Road Name Change 01-91.
After further discussion, it was noted that Mr. Washburn would
be the spokesperson for the neighbors, and would pass this
information on to the other cul-de-sac residents. Mr. DeCamp
emphasized that the proposed name changes need to be submitted
within 15 days.
3. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 01-91:
Application filed by Walter Togni for the a pansion of
"The Card Parlour" into the adjacent tenan space to the
north. Subject site is located at 5950 Camino Real.
Mr. Kaiser presented the staff report noti the application •
includes a substantial modification of the arking regulations
as well as the sign limitations of the downtown area plan.
Staff is recommending approval of the e permit subject to 10
conditions.
Commission questions and discuss ' n followed.
In referencing the new Down wn Master Plan, Commissioner
Waage asked if the card p our would be an allowable or
conditional use. Mr. Kais responded that this use would be
under "amusement services and is conditionally allowed in the
DC Zone.
In response to inqui Mr. DeCamp noted that the only revenue
the City would rec ve would be from business license fees.
Commissioner Jo nson observed that the exit doors swing in.
Mr. DeCamp pointed out that these issues would be resolved
through the uilding permit process since a building permit
will be re ired for the interior alterations.
In answ ing Commissioner Kudlac'
s query, Mr. DeCamp mp noted
that
e expanded nded use has already been established and the
Comm' ssion' s review ofa
th use
permit is a result of
en rcement action.
ATTACHMENT F
PC 5/7/91 - MINUTES EXCERPT
•
B. HEARINGS, APPEARANCES, AND REPORTS
1. ROAD NAME CHANGE 01-91:
Application filed by the City of Atascadero to (1) change
the name of the San Rafael Court nearest to Morro Road;
and (2) change the name of the San Rafael Court located
approximately five iv
e hundred feet south of the above road
(CONTINUED FROM 4112/-91 b1EETING)
Gary Kaiser presented the staff report and provided a synopsis
from the previous hearing on this matter. Staff is
recommending consideration of Chandler Lane, Meseta Lane or
Regato Lane in lieu of Milagro Lane.
Paul Washburn, 8250 San Rafael, stated that he did some
research on the individual who owned the property known as
Chandler Ranch, (Roy Chandler) and offered a summary of the
• history of this property. Mr. Washburn suggested amendment to
of the road name policies to include "historical places" .
Mr. Greening stated that just because a name is in Spanish, it
doesn' t always sound good in English (e.g. , -Maleza means
sickness) .
There was brief discussion among the Commission relative to
the appropriateness of supporting "Chandler" as the new road
name. Commissioner Johnson felt that Chandler meets #1 of the
road naming policy (non-living persons of historical
importance) .
MOTION: By Commissioner Highland, seconded by Commissioner
Kudlac and carried 7:0 to adopt "Chandler Lane" and
"Prado Lane" as new road names to replace "San
Rafael Court" in the two locations.
•
40
is
MORT TO CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF ATASCADERO Item No: B-5
Through: Ray Windsor, City Manager Meeting Date: 5/28/91
File No: TTM 22-90
Via: Henry Engen, Community Development Director
From: 01
1Steven L. DeCamp, City Planner
SUBJECT:
Reconsideration of the conditio'hs of approval for Tentative Tract
Map 22-90 .
RECONWNDATION
Approve amendment of condition of approval #4c as follows :
._. . The resale price restriction shall continue for a
period of S4 15 years from the date of recording the deed
restriction implementing these requirements. "
BACKGROUND:
Tentative Tract Map 22-90 (a condominium conversion) was approved
by the Planning Commission on December ;4, 1990 and confirmed by
the City Council on January 8, 1991 subject to six (6) conditions
of approval . Final map processing for the project is now nearing
completion. The applicant has requested reconsideration of
condition 4c . which placed a 50 year sale price restriction on
the one (1) moderate income density bonus unit included within
the project
At staff's request, the language of condition 4c . was suggested
by the City of San Luis Obispo Housing Authority as an
appropriate means of insuring that the moderate income density
bonus unit originally approved in 1984 would remain affordable to
" persons with "moderate" incomes . The Housing Authority now
agrees that a= 15 year commitment is more reasonable than the 50
years first proposed. As indicated in the attached report, staff
and the Planning Commission concur that a 15 year period of
availability is consistent with the intent of the original
approval of the moderate income density bonus residential unit.
ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A - May 7,, 1991 Staff Report
• Attachment B - May 7,- 1991 Minute Excerpts •
ATTACHMENT A
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: t),�)Doug Davidson, Senior Planner
RE: Tentative Tract Map 22-90 Shahan
DATE: May 7, 1991
SAC .GROUND s
The above referenced map was approved by the Planning Commission '
on December 4, 1990 and subsequently approved by the City Council
on January 8, ' 1991. The application for Final Map approval was
received on January 28, 1991. The map has been checked for final
compliance with the Conditions of Approval, including a City
Attorney review of the required sales restriction agreement for
moderate income persons. On March 11, 1991, the applicant
submitted a request for a reconsideration of Condition #4c. - the
request being;a change of the resale price restriction from a
period of fifty (50) years to fifteen (15) years.
ANALYSIS:
Condition #4c. reads as follows:
. Resale prices shall be determined by using the same method
as that used to compute the original sales price, except
that the value of improvements to the property constructed
by the prior occupant may be added to thesalesprice. The
value of improvements to be added shall be determined in a
manner consistent with current IRS guidelines home
improvement costs. The resale price restriction shall
continue for a period of 50 years from the date of recording
the deed restriction implementing these requirements.
The applicant has requested that the time period limit be reduced
from 50 years to 15 years. Staff concurs that ' a 15 year time
period provides a ;reasonable time frame for the density bonus
unit to remain limited to moderate income persons. Fifteen years
is also consistent with the Conditional Use Permit approval in
1984. Upon further review, staff can find no justification for a
such a discrepancy in housing restrictions between rental units
and condominiums.
i
•
Condition #4 was provided by the City of San Luis Obispo Housing
Authority. The sales restriction of fifty years was imposed on a
specific project in the County of San Luis Obispo; a project
where a large number of low income density bonus units were
involved. The Housing Authority has reconsidered their position
and agrees that fifteen years is the appropriate time period in
this case. Federal tax credits for low income housing are also
granted in 15 year commitments. Furthermore, this is by nature a
moderate income project; current market price is well under the
maximum sales price for moderate income persons.
RECOIrMNDATION
Staff recommends approval of the Reconsideration of Tentative
Tract Map 22-90, specifically reducing the sales restriction in
Condition #4c. from 50 years to 15 years.
Attachments: 1. Request for Reconsideration of Condition #4c.
2. Staff Report
•
March 11 , 1991 •
Planning Staff
City of Atascadero
Dear Staff ,
The owner of Sunrise Apartments , Mr . Edgar H. Shahan , hereby
appeals to the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero to
make the following change in the conditions of approval for the
condominium conversion of Sunrise Apartments , 9305 Musselman Road ,
Atascadero , Ca . :
The requirement to maintain the density bonus unit in this pro-
ject in a low income status for 50 years was an arbitrary figure
proposed by an employee of the Housing Authority of San Luis Obispo
County .
It is requested that the Planning Commission replace this 50
year requirement with the original requirement of 15 years from the
original approval date in 1985 .
This request is made after discussion with Planning Staff and •
receiving recommendations from same .
Very truly yours ,
Edgar H. Shahan
• MAR 11 1991 •
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
• CITY OF ATASCADERO Item: B-2
STAFF REPORT
FOR: Planning Commission Meeting Date: December 4, 1990
BY: Doug Davidson, Senior Planner File No: TTM 22-90
SUBJECT:
To consider a request to convert an e -
q existing nine unit multiple
family project into airspace condominiums.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of Tentative Tract Map 22-90 based on
the Findings for Approval in Exhibit D and the Conditions of
Approval in Exhibit E.
SITUATION AND FACTS:
1. Applicant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Edgar Shahan
• 2. Representative. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .North Coast Engineering
3. Project Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9305 Musselman Ave.
4. Site Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0. 47 acres
5. Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RMF-16
6. General Plan Designation. . . . .High Density Multiple Family
7. Existing Use. . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . .Nine unit project
8. Environmental Status. . . . . . . . .Categorically Exempt
(Class One)
BACKGROUND:
On June 4, 1984, the Planning Commission approved Conditional Use
Permit 02-84, allowing construction of a nine unit multiple
family project, including a density bonus of one unit for
moderate income persons. The subject application for condominium
conversion of the project was accepted as complete on September
25, 1990. The moratorium currently in place took effect on
September 26, 1990.
r
•
ANALYSIS:
Airspace condominiums allow individual ownership of a unit, with
the parking and landscape areas owned in common. Private
agreements (CC&Rs) among the property owners ensure continued
maintenance of the site. Although, the City cannot deny such a
request without a condominium conversion ordinance, staff is
continuing to recommend the installation of separate water meters
as a Condition of Approval. If the Montanaro appeal of the same
condition is successful (scheduled for City Council consideration
November 27, 1990) , this Condition will be eliminated.
Otherwise, the only remaining issue is the disposition of the
density bonus unit.
Conditions #2 and #3 of Conditional Use Permit 02-84 (see Exhibit
F) required the density bonus unit to be available for rent to
moderate income persons for 15 years. The recorded agreement
calls for income limits to be established by the City of San Luis
Obispo Housing Authority. The Housing Authority has no concerns
about the bonus unit being converted to a condominium, as long as
an agreement is recorded limiting the sale of the unit to persons
of moderate income. Likewise, the City Attorney concurs that the
intent of the density bonus is maintained with such a sale •
agreement.
Moderate income as defined by the California Health and Safety
Code corresponds to no more than 120 percent of the County median
income. Current County and Housing Authority policies establish
a maximum sales price for moderate income dwellings as three
times the County median income. Using current income figures
provided by the Housing Authority, the maximum sales price for a
two-bedroom unit limited to moderate income persons is $102, 600.
Condition #4 (Exhibit E.) ensures that this sales restriction is
recorded with the deed to the property.
CONCLUSIONS:
No structural or site modifications are necessary for these
existing units to comply with the Zoning Ordinance or Uniform
Building/Fire Codes, with the exception of providing separate
water meters as required by the Atascadero Mutual Water Co. This
was the last application accepted before the effective date of
the moratorium on condominium conversions. Under the proposed
Condominium Conversion Ordinance, this type of project which does
not meet the City' s current density and development standards is
not eligible for conversion to condominiums.
2
I', • ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A - Zoning Map
Exhibit B - General Plan Map
Exhibit C - Tentative Tract Map
Exhibit D - Findings for Approval
Exhibit E - Conditions of Approval
Exhibit F - Conditional Use Permit 02-84
•
3
( FXHIBIT A
CITA OF ATASCADERO zoNING MAP
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TTM 22-90
DEPARTMENT
I
r
� 07)
RSF (P
ti
W 1 StrE
CRi
7.7
! NAF,! 1, ; CL,
cs
f
� R-S--
1
/
AVE
RS _ ,
• ` ����' j
( HIBIT B
IftN
CITY OF ATASCADERO
,,, GENERAL PLAN MAP
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TTM 22-90
• DEPARTMENT
-
-
ATASCADEhO STATE
1
' •. �� :� 'IO�P/TAL
REC• �, SING • /
S� -; i FAMtL
- - rTE
geM. 8-_HIGH /^v,�__`` ••�
DEN ITY • , • •
FA I LY • •
•
oMr.- � ; i / • � OV 0 NSi1
��• • LTI• AMI
!% D MU I. AMILY
E
4� �? DE T '
Y •, •
ZZ J
Ai
N
r /
�Zftl CITI OF ATASCADERO HIBIT C
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TTM 22-90
DEPARTMENT •
OWNER'S STATEMENT /
"U"T APTLY rOM APPROVAL Or MI OMMOR Or KCAL PROOITT
+w.N O ff.Por Alla QRHY Rut I w TI[LfCALLECA DONE O F
;AO PROCRTY•DR TAC WRg2ID.CLIP O M ILCAL 0...!R I
.40 MAl TA[WOMASMI sow NCIRCII Is TRUE AMO COOKCT -
10 TW RCSI O NT AIIO tKW. `T�'
IF
y
9CIIC0: � I _I ��� ! � •
AOp1(¢ ]YORRO MOAa ATAt�..rRa
UM!t -UPPER UMTS 2 TFMU 9
,
e
to to a ,
.ne.R SCALL I'-2C
is IJVO��
ENGIRttk'S StAtk ftt
WTI a A TRo 9Tonr uRt ....T. I., .
I
I HEI ST STAR THAT TWO MAP RAS PROAM LOOM MY v y U141%2/11MlOI 9 ARE SWIME111CAL �.
SUPEAINIM.AND TO TWE KST Or MY Oq.tEOOE Cd PuCMl STAO=OW STORY UNITS WIN
.LIN THE LOT CINlON wOMAMQ O Tt CITY O ATASCJOQO ALCM To/1R=CMO FLOOR
MY ERTDRCR%TAMMY.
STE`"a s ST[ RCE 29747 •ps.S/St/" OAR UMt I -LOWER
nac�apuQv map No SCALE
I �=
.. -. .......--.- M ` .
v
FAA
1
I tnm.m
J R.
P.. 1..0 w 1 1 IO"AA ►". i..�.Ri i
.M rl..r m 8 I I
i g Q• f9 OJt Ja1 a M IMLOITAMS I=IRI[
R \�- ----- --- �- w� I L— r ---- ----- - EA�IOIT R[7G�N U.uIOILL
-------- 1
----- ir
r _---- I
_ • ,Z, aAP�J1.�j0-M_ WS�YYAII ROW
M IaR.eC - --- r-, -1• 4 1' • • Q
919 AM"a.t ACRES A
R.... OwIRla a PROPOM 2OIOC R1/-q
mE A RRHw R►Et/tlM PELT 11�1Y11/(;ie il�IiiRti. R.iI- I / ( I IC I TOOOIA—RM—I&a MASCO
wtwr waR w9.iw 1 R..a NSi P-14!ft..w MER.EY l `.. WOO ORAOMO PLAIN IT W.r,=
I M.AR.NNR9 dw2tswelw. eAri eElJviwNlak SOTRDOOt la IMtR
trl.NNl w9w wt;.9. f.awR Y••SOI i!!!M P.wSAtiM u /
I wr.IIc.
.Ta.P.NREEw.efllty.ari1Ytl.d11 liailR r YwM. A31 w!b /
R..M wl..lM9.1106".IY Yl.e.S.L6....t.lw. ,
F, VEST NG
TENTATIVE
TRAC'T 2646
IN THE CITY OF ATASCADOtO. COUNTY
AN
OF SM
LUIS O&VO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SCM A SUBOIVISIpP FOR COMMIDMY PURPOSES OF PORTIONS
LOT .Of BLOCK 7 OF EAGLET NO. 2 PER 2 YAPS 79 AND PARC
OF AO 87-073 RECORDED MI BOOK 77 OF PARCEL YAPS AT PAO
NOIfFM COAST 9WINCZA/NC f
• 1t$140 SL St/If O.PASO MOVIES:J9-
EXHIBIT D - Findings for Approval
• Tentative Tract Map 22-90
9305 Musselman Ave. (Shahan/Cuesta Engineering)
December 4, 1990
ENVIRONMENTAL FINDING:
The proposed project is categorically exempt from the provisions
of the California Environmental Quality Act (Class 1 W .
MAP FINDINGS:
1. The proposed map is consistent with the applicable
General or Specific Plan.
2. The design and/or improvements of the proposed subdivision
is consistent with the applicable General or Specific Plan.
3. The site is physically suitable for the proposed type of
development.
4. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of
development.
• 5. The design of the subdivision, as conditioned, and the
proposed improvements, will not cause substantial
environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure
fish and wildlife or their habitat.
6. The design of the subdivision, and the type of the
improvements, will not conflict with easements acquired by
the public at large for access through or the use of
property within the proposed subdivision; or substantially
equivalent alternate easements are provided.
7. The design of the subdivision and/or the type of proposed
improvements will not cause serious health problems.
EXHIBIT B - Conditions of Approval •
Tentative Tract Map 22-90
9305 Musselman Ave. (Shahan/Cuesta Engineering)
December 4, 1990
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1 . Separate water meters for each unit shall be established
prior to the recording of the final map.
2. All existing and proposed utility easements, pipelines, and
other easements are to be shown on the final map. If there
are building or other restrictions related to the easements,
they shall be noted on the final map. The open space lots
shall be designated as Public Utility Easements.
3. The applicant shall establish Covenants, Conditions, and
Restrictions (CC&Rs) for the regulation of land use, control
of nuisances, and architectural control of the site and the
building (s) .
a. These CC&Rs shall be submitted for review and approval
by the City Attorney and the Community Development
Director prior to the approval of the final map. •
b. These CC&Rs shall be administered by a Condominium
Owners Association.
4. The one density bonus unit shall be remain available to
moderate income persons as follows :
a. Sales price shall be determined by using the current
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
Section 8 income tables. The sales price is calculated
by determining the largest family the unit can
accommodate (assuming two persons per bedroom) and
multiplying the appropriate median income figure by
three.
b. The maximum income for the buyer shall be low and
moderate income as defined in Section 50093 of the
California Health and Safety Code. This limit
corresponds to no more 120 percent of the County median
income for the actual size of the family to accommodate
the dwelling.
C. Resale prices shall be determined by using the same
method as that used to compute the original sales
price, except that the value of improvements to the .
• property constructed by the prior occupant may be added
to the sales price. The value of improvements to be
added shall be determined in a manner consistent with
current IRS guidelines for capitalizing home
• improvement costs. The resale price restriction shall
continue for a period of 50 years from the date of
recording the deed restriction implementing these
requirements.
d. There shall be a certification as to the sales price
and income qualification of the buyer required for all
sales of the dwelling. The certification shall be
performed by the Housing Authority of the City of San
Luis Obispo or its appointed agent. The Housing
Authority or its agent shall perform the certification
for a fee equal to 1/10 of 1% of the maximum sales
price allowed.
e. A deed restriction shall be recorded to enforce the
provisions outlined in this condition prior to
recording the final map. The deed restriction shall
set forth the detailed sales price calculation
methodology, the income limit restriction for buyers,
the length of the term and the certification
requirement. The deed restriction shall provide for
judicial remedy for failure to comply with the
provisions of the deed restriction.
5. A final map, in compliance with all conditions set forth
• herein, shall be submitted for review and approval in
accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City
Subdivision Ordinance prior to recordation.
a. Monuments shall be set at all new property corners
by a Registered Civil Engineer or Licensed Land
Surveyor as required the Land Surveyors Act and the
Subdivision Map Act. Monuments set within any road
right-of-way shall conform to City standard M-1.
b. Pursuant to Section 66497 of the Subdivision Map Act,
the enginner or surveyor shall notice the City Engineer
in writing that the monuments have been set.
C. A recently updated preliminary title report shall be
submitted for review in conjunction with the processing
of the final map.
d. A preliminary subdivision guarantee shall be submitted
for review in conjunction with the processing of the
final map.
6. Approval of this tentative map shall expire two years from
the date of final approval unless an extension of time is
granted pursuant to a written request prior to the
expiration date.
l
r
EXHIBIT F
TTM 22-90
STAFF REPORT
Planning Commission - City of Atascadero •
Date: May 21, 1984
Item: Conditional Use Permit 2-84
Notice of Public Hearing was pub Public Hearing Case: CUP 2-84
lished in the Atascadero News on Public hearing to consider a pro-
May 11, 1984 and all owners of posal to allow construction of a
record property located within nine unit apartment project in-
300 feet were notified by United cluding a density bonus request
States mail on that same date. with provisions for moderate in-
come persons in the RMF/16 Zone.
A. LOCATION: 9305 Musselman Road (Ptn. Lot 4, Block 7 , Eaglet #2)
(2 lots)
Refer to Exhibit "A" for location map for this proposal.
B. SITUATION AND FACTS: -
1. Request. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Approval of a nine unit apart-
ment project including a den-
sity bonus request with provi- •
sions for moderate income per-
sons in the RMF/16 Zone.
2. Applicant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .L.D. McCaslin
3. Owner. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Carl Stewart and Rex Hendrix
4. Architect. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .MDW Associates
5 . Site Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0. 49 acre (gross) /. 46 acre
(net)
6. Streets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Musselman Road is a private 30
foot wide street.
7. Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .RMF/16
8. Existing Use. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . acant
9. Adjacent Zoning and Use. . . . . . .North: RMF/16 , mobile home
park
East: RMF/16 , residences
South: County, State Hospital
West: RMF/16 , residences and
• apartments •
Conditional Use Permit 2-84 (McCaslin)
10. General Plan Designation. . . . . .High Density Multiple Family
• Residential
11. Terrain. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Flat
12. Environmental Status. . . . . . . . . .Negative Declaration
C. SITE AND DEVELOPMENT DATA:
1. Site area: 0.49 acre (gross) , 0. 46 (net - after ten foot
dedication)
2. Number of units: proposed - 9
allowed - 7
3. Density: proposed - 19. 56 dwelling units per acre
allowed - 16 dwelling units per acre
4. Parking: required - 18 spaces including one handicapped
proposed - 17 spaces including one handicapped
5. Density Bonus: permitted by CUP - 25% (2 units)
requested - 25% (2 units)
• D. ANALYSIS
Land Use Policy Proposal Number 8 on Page 58 of the General Plan
stipulates that " . . . . . in determining permitted densities for mul-
tiple family residential develpoments, net acreage (excluding land
area needed for streets rights-of-way) shall be used. " Musselman
Road is a 30 foot wide street along this frontage. With the ten
feet of dedication that is necessary (which correlates to the ded-
ication made for the lot split just northeast of this site - TPM
1-84 - with the same applicant/owner) , the net acreage becomes
0. 46 acre. This allows 7.36 dwelling units which rounds to seven
units permitted (Section 9-1.109 (b) (4) ) on the site. The density
bonus (25%) would allow two additional units on the site (7 X . 25
= 1. 75 units, rounded to two units) . Therefore, the density pro-
posed is allowable. However, the road dedication changes the
setback for the front structure which will require a modification
of the design. Additionally, some of the parking and driveway
development standards have not been met. A corrected metes and
bounds description for the interior lot (50 ' X 1851 ) and a metes
and bounds description for the Musselman Road frontage lot will
need to be submitted to merge the two lots. The applicant has re-
ceived approval of a sewer extension for the two lots by the San-
itation Board (Resolution 22-84 of the Atascadero County Sanita-
tion District) . The applicant has also submitted a tentative
agreement to rent all the units in the project to tenants quali-
fied under the Section 8 Housing Assistance Payments Program.
This arrangement would be favorable in Staff' s opinion, provided •
at least two of the units (bonus units) are guaranteed to be oc-
cupied by qualified tenants during the 15 year period.
2
Conditional Use Permit 2-84 (McCaslin)
The design modifications necessary for this project are critical
to the ability of the project to contain nine dwelling units. •
Therefore, Staff would recommend submittal of a revised site plan
that could be reviewed prior to continuing with the project.
E. RECOMMENDATLON
Staff recommends that this item be continued to a date specific
to give applicant an opportunity to redesign the project to
achieve consistency with the above noted code requirements.
•
3
STAFF REPORT
Planning Commission - City of Atascadero
Date: June 4, 1984
Item: B-1 (continued from Planning Commission meeting of May 21, 1984)
Notice of Public Hearing was pub- Public Hearing Case: CUP 2-84
lished in the Atascadero News on Public hearing to consider a pro-
May 11, 1984 and all owners of posal to allow construction of a
record property located within nine unit apartment project in-
300 feet were notified by United cluding a density bonus request
States mail on that same date. with provisions for moderate in-
come persons in the RMF/16 Zone.
A. LOCATION: 9305 Musselman Road (Ptn. Lot 4 , Block 7, Eaglet #2)
(2 lots)
Refer to Exhibit "A" for location map for this proposal.
B. SITUATION AND FACTS:
1. Request. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Approval of a nine unit apart-
ment project including a den-
sity bonus request with provi-
sions for moderate income per-
sons in the RMF/16 Zone.
2. Applicant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .L.D. McCaslin
3. Owner. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Carl Stewart and Rex Hendrix
4. Architect. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .MDW Associates
5. Site Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.49 acre (gross)/.47 acre
(net)
6 . Streets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Musselman Road is a private 30
foot wide street.
7. Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .RMF/16
8. Existing Use. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Vacant
9. Adjacent Zoning and Use. . . . . . .North: RMF/16 , mobile home
park
East: RMF/16, residences
South: County, State Hospital
West: RMF/16, residences and
apartments
oe
Conditional Use Permit 2-84 (McCaslin) /
10. General Plan Designation. . . . . .High Density Multiple Family
Residential •
11. Terrain. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Level
12. Environmental Status. . . . . . . . . .Negative Declaration
C. SITE AND DEVELOPMENT DATA:
1. Site area: 0. 49 acre (gross) , 0.47 (net - after five foot
dedication)
2. Number of units: proposed - 9
allowed 8
3. Density: proposed - 19.15 dwelling units per acre
allowed - 16. 00 dwelling units per acre
4. Parking: required- 18 spaces including one handicapped
proposed - 17 spaces including one handicapped
5. Density Bonus: permitted by CUP - 25% (2 units)
requested - 12 1/2% (1 unit)
D. ANALYSIS •
The City Engineer has modified his request for ten feet of dedi-
cation along the frontage of the site. This was agreed to by
requesting that the applicant install curb and gutter on both
sides of Musselman Road and sidewalk installation on the project
side of the road only. Normally, sidewalk would be required q fired on
both sides of the street. However , since no development is likely
to occur on the State Hospital property in the foreseeable future,
the needed improvements can be accomplished in a 35 foot right-of-
way width.
The modified net area of the project now allows the applicant to
construct 8 units on the site without benefit of the density bonus
(0. 47 acre X 16 = 7.52 units which rounds to 8 units) . One addi-
tional unit amounts to a 12 1/2% density bonus requested.
The modified dedication retains the 25 foot front setback neces-
sary for site development. The revised plans also indicate that
eighteen parking spaces have been provided along with the neces-
sary trash enclosure.
Staff still needs the metes and bounds descriptions necessary for
the lot merger. The lot merger must be accomplished before build-
ing permits can be issued since the density, parking, and access
requirements do not meet the standards required by the ordinance
• for each individual lot.
2
r
Conditional Use Permit -84 (McCaslin) /"7,
E. RECOMMENDATION
• Staff recommends approval of Conditional Use Permit 2-84 based on
the Findings contained in Section F below and subject to the con-
ditions contained in Exhibit "A" attached. Additionally, Staff
recommends that the Planning Commission certify the attached Neg-
ative Declaration as a complete and accurate document consistent
with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) .
F. Findings
1. The application together with the recommended conditions
conforms to the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and
General Plan.
2. The application as presented will not have a significant ad-
verse effect upon the environment, and preparation of an
Environmental Impact Report is not necessary.
3. The project consists of the minimum number of units for a
density bonus and performance and management guarantees have
been provided to demonstrate that the bonus dwelling units
will be available to the targeted income group for a minimum
of 15 years.
4. Theranti
g ng of this density bonus serves to support goals
• and objectives set forth
� in the HousingElement of the Gen-
eral Plan.
5. The establishment and conduct of a multiple family residen-
tial use which includes a density bonus will not be detrimen-
tal to the health, safety or welfare of the general public or
persons residing in the neighborhood, nor will it be detri-
mental to property or improvements in the vicinity.
6. The proposed multiple family project will not generate traf-
fic beyond the safe capacity of roads in the vicinity or be-
yound the full development capacity of the area.
7. The proposed use will not be inconsistent with the character
of the immediate neighborhood nor be contrary to its orderly
development since it is a designated high density
neighborhood.
3
Conditional Use Permit 2-84 (McCaslin)
EXHIBIT "A" - Conditional Use Permit 2-84
Conditions of Approval
June 4, 1984
1. Site development including buildings, driveways, parking, land-
scaping and other features shall be consistent with plans submit-
ted including any modifications contained herein and all provi-
sions of Title 9 of the Atascadero Municipal Code (Zoning
Regulations) .
2. The applicant (owner) shall enter into an agreement with the City
of Atascadero to provide performance and management guarantees
which demonstrate continued availability of the one bonus unit for
the targeted income group for 15 years. This may be accomplished
by the use of Conditions, Covenants and Restrictions (CC&Rs) or a
separate agreement or lease arrangement. Any documents used to
ensure availability of these units for the targeted income group
shall be recorded with the San Luis Obispo County Recorder prior
to the project' s final inspection.
a. The CC&Rs or other agreement shall be submitted to and ap- •
proved by the City Attorney and Planning Department prior to
final inspection.
b. Any CC&Rs or agreements shall be administered by the owner.
3 . The bonus unit shall be rented only to persons who have been cer-
tified as having household incomes which are 120% or less of the
median income of San Luis Obispo County, as such income is deter-
mined from time to time by the City of San Luis Obispo Housing
Authority. The Planning Director shall certify eligibility with
this criteria upon application by. a prospective tenant. The ag-
reements between the owner and City of Atascadero shall specify
the application procedure and all eligibility requirements, which
shall not be modified or revised without approval by the City of
Atascadero.
4
• Exhibit A, Page Two - Conditional Use Permit 2-84
Conditions of Approval
June 4, 1984
4. Provision shall be made for this project to connect to community
water and sewer facilities. A letter shall be obtained from the
Atascadero Mutual Water Company stating that they are willing and
able to serve this project which shall be submitted to the Plan-
ning Department. All conditions of Resolution No. 22-84 of the
Atascadero Sanitation District shall also be complied with prior
to occupancy of the site.
5. All other utilities not already in place shall be extended under-
ground at the time of building permit.
6. Complete street improvements of Musselman Road shall be accom-
plished in accordance with Section 9-4.158 et seq. of Title 9 in
the 35 foot right-of-way.
a. Street improvements shall include sidewalk, curb, gutter, and
street paveout along the northerly frontage and curb, gutter
and street paveout only on the southerly side of the street.
• b. Musselman Road shall be improved to City standards.
C. Musselman Road' s right-of-way including an additional five
feet along the property frontage shall be dedicated to the
City for road purposes.
7. Submit two sets of grading and drainage plans in conformance with
Sections 9-4. 138 et seq. and 9-4.148 et seq. (respectively) of
Title 9 prior to issuance of any building permits and in conjunc-
tion with the required street improvement plans.
a. A drainage acceptance letter may be required from the State
of California for the Planning and Public Works Departments.
8. No building permits shall be issued until a lot merger is ap-
proved and recorded by the City of Atascadero.
9. All conditions of approval herein shall be complied with prior to
occupancy of any structure.
10. This Conditional Use Permit shall expire one year from the date of
Planning Commission approval unless all conditions are completed
and a building permit issued, or unless an extension is granted
pursuant to Section 9-2.118 of Title 9.
-�
�• `� SF s�..
�s,\•� �� �, �y l
4.J.1Mq
�' \1•�,
No
c 9025
+ots
►f�t4 . 1,.
>� v C Nw _ ,to +� t• nss a l •
- CO 73/7' sass
r� 10-e 026 23
a
4q ._,3.•. • 1 I 1 { all '`X 10
27 s \�I• t
ins b� " �\ \ •e
8 Rs
e
CT c 31 a F 34
err
,
364 tt err •oy°
q, 1� ye itt� c•.,t-lam
��_�w ��e.�, ,a ♦ 0 2 4PY y j � `Je� 2
:g = C e �j5.-' RMF/
43 0
r4l
A ° d
vj
24 isME:
(D 6
cr
22
20 ZZ dud&&Aboft-
c
`o`o• cl`. „r•`'\opt ° -
�, \ • _fat +m.00 j.Qu..,....N
0 1 � a Iwt lT wsa•ty.t�"ii°!t#w+es�!eer tr.r+irt
23
$p GPM
ot CITY OF ATASCADERO
4 1 '
Planning Department
cY
cu-P -Z
oz
C"JE,
Map No. 19
IF so 00, I 1
i. JR z
m
0
M
U)c r
>
K
r
m
z yl
C:
z
rl Eek
m
m
m
z
m
Ct �w C)a
z
0
A C/)
m
N 56'29'27-E
`i _'' I —gin D C
r
7-
(fel
lz
_ _ _ ___� _ _ -_ �� � y
t
MUSSELMAN Fl0A0
SIZE PLAN n, dui
MU:i:I..kl:.N GARDEN APARTMENTS L.O. M,
NINO REAL
iotos h AM
....1.0,10
I A CA.13421
F-UA: AIASCAOERO, GA.93411
MINUTES EXCERPT - PLANNING COMMISSION - 12/4/90
r
of the land, this problem will exist w her development
occurs or not.
In response to query by Cop ssioner Waage concerning
witigation of downstream -oblems , Mr. Sims discussed
varying mitivation measur - which could help the drainage .
Discussion follow- - relative to mitigation of Ongoing
drainage proble .
MOTION: y Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commissioner
Highland and carried 6 : 0 : 1 (Commisisoner Hanauer
absent) to deny the appeal on Precise Plan 83-90 .
2 . TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 22-90 :
Application filed by Edgar Shahan (North Coast Engin-
eering) to convert an existing nine-unit multiple
family project into airspace condoi'iliniums . Subject
site is located at 9305 Musselman Avenue .
Douu Davidson presented the staff report and provided a
synoposis on a previous conditional use permit approval
which allowed a density bonus unit . Staff is recommendinq
approval of the tract map subject to six conditions . •
Commission questions and discussion followed.
Commissioner Lochridge asked if there would be costs
associated with private agreements (CC&Rs, maintenance of
common ground, etc . ) , and how tliese costs would affect a low
to moderate income individual with respect to the density
bonus unit .
Mr. Davidson replied that the income bracket would relate to
the sales price and that tiie purchaser of the moderate
income unit would be subject to homeowner association fees .
Commissioner Lochridge expressed concern that with the
additional association fees , the moderate income person
would be priced out of his unit, and asserted that it is up
to the Commission to assure that housing availability is
maintained ( i . e . moderate income unit( .
Commissioner Highland commented that if a moderate income
individual were to purchase a Home at that figure and with
those payment, lie would also be subject to property taxes ,
etc . He added lie did not think the Commission is in the
position of being able to control these factors .
• Commissioner Johnson asked if provision could be •
incorporated in the conditions to exempt the bonus unit from
homeowner fees . Mr. Davidson noted that #3 is worded for
the CC&Rs and a statement could be added that the density
MINUTES EXCERPT - PLANNING COMMISSION - 12/4/90
• bonus unlit shall be exempt frauartier ation i
p p in the
homeowner agreelll(jnts .
Discussion ensued concerning the feasibility of limiting the
cost of the unit to a percentage of the sales price or
limiting it to a percentage of the homeowner fees .
Commissioner Highland pointed out that homeowner fees call
vary f r ollt month to month depending oil what Illaj or things need
to be done ; so tying it in ally way directly to a percentage
,)f sales price would not work.
Camluissioner Johnson concurred adding that if those monthly
fees that were to be paid were limited to 2/3 of the regular
fees paid by other melllbers of the association, this would be
fairer.
Steve Sylvester with North Coast Engineering, representing
the applicant, noted concurrence with tiie staff report . He
poilited out that the individual units will sell for between
580 , 000 to 590 , 000 . He felt it would be unfair to put the
burden for association fees oil the other 8 units .
• John Shahan, applicant, provided a background oil the history
of the project. He added that considerable amounts of money
have been lost in rents over the years with the large
vacancy rates . He has had to lower rents 10-15;. Ili
support of coildominiuills , Mr. Shahan stated that Musselman
already has condominium projects and felt this would be a
nice location for families just starting out . With regard
to the bonus unit, Mr. Shahan stated lie is willing to work
within guide- lines ill providing an affordable price to low
and moderate income individuals . Rather than adjust
participation in 'fees , lie suggested that the sales price of
the Unit be lowered. He pointed out that the homeowner fees
would not be excessive but would mainly be for trash pick-
up, etc .
- End of Public Testimony -
Commissioner Kudlac stated his feeling that it would be
unfair to assess a smaller homeowners fee for the bonus unit
as the buvers would be utilizing the same services as the
other eight condos . Chairperson Luria concurred noting he
did not feel tine intent of the bonus unit is for a "free
ride" . He voiced his feeling that there is all opportunity
along with a certain amount of responsibility in waintaiiling
the property. Commissioner Waage concurred.
• MOTION: By Comillissioner Highland and seconded by Commis- •
sioner Kudlac to approve Tentative Tract Map 22-90
based on the Findings and subject to the
Conditions of Approval .
MINUTES EXCERPT - PLANNING COMMISSION - 12/4/90
•
Commissioner Johnson argued the point that he still does not
think the intent of the bonus unit would be realized.
Commissioner Lochridge voiced concern that this is taking
away the security the City has had for affordable housing.
He added he has lived in residential units where monthly
fees can run $75 . 00 . and felt that low to moderate income
families will not be able to afford these fees .
MOTION: Commissioner Johnson offered to amend the motion
to add "c" to Condition i#3 to reflect that future
Owners of the bonus unit be exempted from paying
the full homeowners fees by 20; . Commissioner
Lochridge seconded the amendment . The amendment
to the motion was defeated 4 : 2 : 1 with the
following roll call vote:
AYES : Commissioners Johnson and Lochridge
NOES : Commissioners Kudlac, Highland, Waage , and
Chairperson Luna
ABSENT: Commissioner Hanauer
After further discussion, the motion to approve Tentative •
Tract Map 22-90 carried 4 : 2 : 1 with the following roll call
vote:
AYES : Commissioners Highland, Kudlac;, Waage, and
Chairperson Luna
NOES : Commissioners Lochridge and Johnson
ABSENT: , Commissioner Hanauer
Chairperson Luna declared a recess at 9 : 15 p.m . ; meeting
reconvened at 9 : 28 p.m.
3 . TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 23-90 :
Application filed by David Sm ' t'tl iCuesta Engineering)
to subdivide one existing 1 - into eight airspace con-
dominiums and a common aria. Subject site is located
at 9313-9327 Musselman enue .
Karl Schoettler present the staff report noting staff ' s
conclusion that the a ication represents a sound proposal
for the establishmei of condominiums .
• In response t query by Commissioner Waage concerning •
vesting maps Mr. Decamp explained this project has been
approved a precise plan which gives the applicant an
entitlem" t to proceed with the project. The vesting map in
t111S C " 'e iS L'edllildatlt.
PC5/ 7/91 ATTACHMENT E
PAGE 3 MINUTES EXCERPT
• Gary Kaiser presented the staff report and provided a syno is
from the previous hearing on this matter. Sta is
recommending consideration of Chandler Lane, Meseta ane or
Regato Lane in lieu of Milagro Lane.
Paul Washburn, 8250 San Rafael, stated that e did some
research on the individual who owned the pro rty known as
Chandler Ranch, (Roy Chandler) and offered summary of the
history of this property. Mr. Washburn Sugg sted amendment to
of the road name policies to include "his orical places" .
Mr. Greening stated that just because name is in Spanish, it
doesn ' t always sound good in English (e.g. , Maleza means
sickness) .
There was brief discussion amo g the Commission relative to
the appropriateness of suppo ing "Chandler" as the new road
name. Commissioner Johnson elt that Chandler meets #1 of the
road naming policy (n -living persons of historical
importance) .
MOTION: By Commiss 'oner Highland, seconded by Commissioner
Kudlac a carried 7:0 to adopt "Chandler Lane" and
"Prado/ ane" as new road names to replace "San
RafaeY Court" in the two locations.
•
2. TENTAXIVE PARCEL MAP 29-90:
Appkication filed by Victor Desrosier (Dan Stewart) to
syi6divide one parcel of approximately 4. 81 acres into
three (3) lots of 1 . 01 , 1. 72 , and 2. 08 acres each.
Subject site is located at 3450 E1 Camino Real (CONTINUED
FROM 4/2/91 MEETING) .
Chairperson Luna noted a request from the applicant to again
continue the matter to the June 4, 1991 meeting.
There was no public testimony.
3. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 22-90:
Application filed by Edgar Shahan to reconsider Condition
#4c of the above-referenced map - a condition which
requires the provision of the one density bonus unit to
moderate income persons for a period of fifty (50) years.
Subject site is located at 9305 Musselman.
Doug Davidson presented the staff report and provided a
background on the history of the project. The applicant is
requesting that the time period limit be reduced from 50 years
to 15 years and listed reasons why staff concurs. He noted
• that the Housing authority concurs that 15 years is the •
apropriate time limit in this case.
PC5/7/91 MINUTES EXCERPT
PAGE 4
Commission questions and discussion followed. •
Commissioner Kudlac asked for clarification as to when the
time limit would start (in 1985 or 2000) . Mr. Davidson stated
the 15 year period would begin when the tract map was approved
(January, 1991) .
John Shahan, representing the applicant, stated that there are
no benefits to the applicant in reducing the limit from 50 to
15 years. He added that when the applicant purchased the
units in 1985 , a 15 year restriction was already there, and it
was his understanding that the same 15 year restriction would
follow through. He asked that the Planning Commission
consider the 15 year time frame from the original date of
approval.
MOTION: By Commissioner Johnson to approve reconsideration
of Tentative Tract Map 22-90 in modifying Condition
#4c to reflect 15 years instead of 50. Chairperson
Luna seconded the motion.
Commissioner Highland stated that this issue deals with the
same properties with the only difference being that there is
now different ownership and that the units are now
condominiums. He added that the basic reason for the 15 year
period was to provide for the density bonus which has not
changed, and noted he would have difficulty in starting the 15 •
years with this tract map approval.
Commissioner Kudlac disagreed stating that the Planning
Commission has heard much about affordable housing and now
here is a chance to extend it a little longer.
Commissioner Hanauer took issue noting that affordable housing
is not the issue, but has to do with dealing fairly with the
applicant.
Commissioner Johnson pointed out that at the time of the tract
map hearing, there was quite a bit of discussion on the bonus
unit and the opportunity of having it remain available to
moderate income persons . He commented that Commissioners
Highland and Hanauer have always been proponents of affordable
housing yet they appear to be against this issue.
Commissioner Lochridge concurred with Commissioners Johnson
and Kudlac stating that the Commission preaches affordability
whether it is done in the form of density bonuses or smaller
lots.
Commissioner Hanauer expressed his feeling that he resents
being accused of removing the condition for the affordable
unit. He felt the issue involves the time frame and whether
• it is fair to have the 15 year time limit go from 1985 or from •
1991. He emphasized that he does not need a:iyone telling him
that he has changed his mind on affordable housing.
PC5/7/91 MINUTES EXCERPT
PAGE 5
The motion carried 4:1:1:1 with the following roll
call:
AYES: Commissioners Johnson, Kudlac, Lochridge and
Chairperson Luna
NOES: Commissioner Highland
ABSTAIN: Commissioner Hanauer
ABSENT: Commissioner Waage
Chairperson Luna called a recess at 8 : 30 p.m. ; eting
reconvened at 8 : 43 p.m.
4. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 02-91:
Application filed by the San Luis Obis o Non-Profit
Housing Corporation (Jeff Dillon) to con ider a request
to convert an existing motel building ( pire Inn Motel)
into low income apartments for senior itizens. Subject
site is located at 5880 Ardilla Roa .
Mr. Davidson presented the staff repor on this matter. Staff
• is recommending approval subject to conditions.
Commission questions and discussi followed.
Commissioner Lochridge referenc d #5 and asked if a precedent
would be set by not requiri g the utilities to be placed
underground. Mr. Davidson r plied that given the location of
the building and the site ' terrain, it would be too large of
a burden to place on this articular project, and would not be
feasible without rippin the site up to do the undergrounding.
He added that this typ of condition is evaluated on a case by
case basis.
Commissioner Kudl asked what guarantees there are to prevent
another type of se going in at a later date. Mr. Davidson
explained that Condition #1 locks this project into that
specific grou to be managed by the Housing Authority under
the guideli s established by the Federal funding program.
Jeff Dill n, agent for the applicant, spoke in support of the
project and provided a background on the approach used for
remode ing the project. An attempt has been made to create a
resi ntial feeling for each of the individual units through
the use of landscaping, patios, etc.
• Dillon spoke about budget constraints in complying with
the conditions of approval, but emphasized that the applicant •
is concerned about safety along Ardilla Road and would like to
work with staff to install a sidewalk along the Ardilla Road
REPORT TO :CITY COUNCIL Meeting Date: 5/28/91
CITY OF ATASCADERO` Item No. • B-6'
Through: Ray Windsor, City Manager
From: Greg Luke, Director of Public Works 4—
SUBJECT:
Modification of Condition of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map'
12-89, Colombo, 10785 El Camino Real.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that Council approve modifying the conditions
of approval for the subject project.
BACKGROUND:
This Tentative Parcel ;Map divides one parcel into four. This
property is located on El Camino Real south of the State Hospital.
• DISCUSSION:
During the review ;process the following condition was placed
on this parcel map;
2 . .All annexation fees in effect at the time shall
be paid 'prior to recordation of the final 'map.
This condition cannot be met at this time as annexation fees'
for multi-family development are calculated on a per-unit basis.
There is currently one single-family home on one lot with the other
lots vacant.
We are proposing that the single-family residence be required
to pay the annexation fee upon connection but allow the remaining
3 parcels to be conditioned to pay the annexation fees upon
development.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this modification.
• I,
I
AAfWr NORTH COAST ENGINEERING, INC.
INUIG Civil Engineering • Land Surveying - Project Development
May 2, 1991
City of Atascadero
6500 Palma Avenue
Atascadero, CA 93423
Attn: Greg Luke
Subject: Colombo 'Parcel Map AT 89-055
Tentative Map 12-89
Dear Greg;
Condition No. 2 of the Conditions of Approval states, ' The
newly created lots shall be connected to the public sewer. All
annexation fees in effect at the time shall be paid prior to
recordation of the final map. "
Proposed Lot 1 of Parcel Map AT 89-055 will continue to be occu-
pied by Genevieve Columbo in her existing single family res
Bence. The Colombos are unsure about the status of future devel-
opment for lots 2 through 4
We hereby .request that the 'payment of annexation fees be deferred
until such time that building permits are issued.
Sincerely,
�tJ�
Ro r, A. Liss
RAL/lb
8905501.1tr
715 24th Street,Suite`0 Paso Robles CA 93446 (805)239-3127 FAX(805)239-0758
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL Agernde I tem: 4"- B-7
CITY OF `ATASCADERO
Through: Ray Windsor , City Manager Meeting Date: -5*444 49i 5/28/91
From. Mark Joseph, Administrative Services Director
SLMJECTs Developing a Fiscal Impact Model (Phase' II of Crawford,
Multari and Starr contract)`.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adoption of Resolution No .
39-91 authoriz'i'ng the City Manager to execute an agreement with
Crawford, Multari and Starr (CMS) to develop a fiscal impact
model .
HACKQy } ANALYSIS
The first phase of this project was approved by Council and
completed in December, 1990. The result was the Long-Range
Fiscal Analysis for the City. The second phase is to develop a
computerized fiscal impact model ,; to assist in evaluating
economic , and certain non•-economic, issues relating to new
development. Mike Multari 's attached letter best clarifies the
proposal and time frames.
The $22,000 has been budgeted (one-half in FY 90-91 ; the
balance is scheduled for FY 91-92) out of Developer Impact Fees.
Phases III and IV, relating to the development of a
computerized land use data base and Geo-basad Information System
(GIS) , have been addressed through the purchase and installation
of the Computer Network in Community Development and Public Works
as authorized by Council in the current budget .
RESOLUTION NO. 38-91
A RESOLUTION OF TER CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ATASCADRRO, CALIFORNIA
AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AE RR ` WITH
CRAWFORD, MULTARI & STARR
TO
DEVELOP A COMPUTERIZED FISCAL IMPACT MODEL.
The City Council of the City of Atascadero, California, hereby
resolves as follows:
1. The City Manager is hereby authorized to execute an
agreement with: Crawford, Multari & Starr to construct a
Computerized Fiscal Impact Model, and all other
agreements or documents required to effectuate the terms
of agreement.
2 The City Manager is hereby authorized to make minor
corrections or modifications of a mathematical or
clerical nature.
3. The Finance Director is hereby authorized to: appropriate
funds, if necessary, release and expend funds; and issue
warrants to comply with the terms of this agreement.
PASSED AND .ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of
the City of Atascadero held on the 28th day of May, 1991.
CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA
By:
Robert B. Lilley, Mayor
ATTEST:
Lee Dayka, `City Clerk
Crawford Multari & Starr
planning • architecture • public policy
April 18, 1991
Mark Joseph, Director
Administrative Services
City of Atascadero
6500 Palma Avenue
Atascadero, CA 93442
Dear Mark,
As you requested, attached is a brief work program, schedule and budget for the next phase of
the Fiscal Planning Project. I have also enclosed an agreement for services if this proposal meets
with your approval.
In sum,we will provide a fiscal impact model which can be used by the City staff to evaluate
individual projects as well as changes in zoning or amendments to the general plan. The model
will be "user friendly";that is, it will be largely menu driven so that little technical knowledge of the
software is required.
We will include 24 hours of training time. We expect that about half of that time will be used to
teach the appropriate staff persons how to use the model and half will be reserved for responding
to questions or problems that arise as staff begins to use it.
We have also budgeted for two presentations, one each to the Planning Commission and to the
City Council. We,of course, can make additional presentations on a time-and-materials basis, if
necessary.
Because of work loads,we will not be able to begin until about June 1. We will have a schematic
system design, including diagrams and some explanatory text, for the staff to review by July 1.
The model and procedures manual will be delivered by September 1. Training and presentations
to the Commission and Council would take place during September, or whenever deemed
convenient by the City.
Our budget remains the same as in the original proposal: $22,000.
If you need more information, or if any of this needs to be changed, please give me a call. Thank
you.
Sincerely,
Michael Multari
Principal
34' HI:1Uera St., SU`A.ie 202 5dn, _u c 0tlspo. 0A 9 0 F;35541 304 va
MEETING AGENDA
HATE S l eft/91 ITEM I --B=8._..
RESOLUTION NO. 43-91
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA
CREA►TINC A POLICY RELATED TO
CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDING
.WHEREAS, it is expressly prohibited to expend funds on capital
projects without Council authorization; and
WHEREAS, there are occasions when additional funds are
required for capital projects after bids have been awarded and work
has begun; and
WHEREAS, in order to recognize the importance that timing can
and does have on project costs.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that the Atascadero City
Council does hereby adopt the following policy:
On any capital improvement project up to $25 000, staff (with``
concurrence of the City Manager) shall have the discretion to
make up to 10% adjustment on the total bid with the under-
standing that such action 'shall receive Council ratification
at the next available scheduled Council meeting. In the event
that an increase in cost exceeds 10% of the bid price on any
project above $25,000, staff must either wait for the City
Council to act on such change at the next available scheduled'
Council meeting or request that Council convene a special
meeting requiring 24 hours notice.
On motion by Councilmember Nimmo, seconded by Councilmember
Dexter, the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety
on the following roll- call vote:
AYES: '
NOES:
ABSENT:
i
ADOPTED: _ CITY OF ATASCADERO
ATTEST:
By:
ROBERT .
B f
LILLEY Mayor
_ Y
LEE DAYKA, City Clerk •
Resolution No. 43-91
Page 2
APPROVED AS TO CONTENTS
RAY WINDSOR, City Manager
. M E M O R A N D U M
To: City Council
From: Ray Windsor, City Managers
Subject: Capital project overrun approval
Date: May 13, 1991
As tonight' s agenda reflects, the fire station parking lot project
incurred considerably more expense than we had anticipated. This
issue came to light at the time I was on vacation and, after dis-
cussing it with Greg Luke and Mark Joseph and being apprised that
the cost could grow even greater if there were further delay while
waiting for the next Council meeting, I directed Mark to contact
each member of the Council informally to obtain authorization to
continue the project. This action on my part was a judgment call
and raises the issue of legality with respect to the expenditure of
• unbudgeted funds without benefit of a special meeting.
Under the circumstances, and in order to avoid criticism or legal
problems in the future, I would like to suggest that Council adopt
a policy with respect to capital projects of under $25, 000 which
would allow staff, with the Manager' s concurrence, to make a
variance of up to 10% of the contracted price where time and cir-
cumstances warrant, with the understanding that a notice of such
change would be brought back to the City Council for ratification
at the first possible regular meeting following. This would mean
that any project of up to $25, 000 in scope which, through unknown
circumstances, required an additional appropriation in excess of
10% of the contract price could only be authorized by either
waiting for the first appropriate regular Council meeting or by
calling, through the issuance of a 24-hour notice, a special Coun-
cil meeting.
RW:cw
c: Department Heads
City Attorney
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL Meeting Date: 5/28/91
CITY OF ATASCADERO Item No. B-9
Through: Ray Windsor, City Manager
From: Greg Luke, Director of Public Works
SUBJECT:
Bridge contracts with John Wallace & Associates
RECOMMENDATION:
In accordance with ;the discussion withthe ,City Attorney,
staff recommends that Council approve the following documents
attached to this staff report (Resolution No. 44-91)_
Addendum No. 1 t Agreement for Atascadero Creek. - San
Andres Avenue Bridge Replacement
Addendum No. l to Agreement for Garcia Road Bridge
Replacement over Graves Creek
Resolution No. 44-91 relating to professional services
pertaining to the Lewis Avenue Bridge and the Sycamore
Road Bridge
DISCOSSI Ns
These documents represent the changes negotiated with John
Wallace and Associates including the additional work needed to
complete the San Andres and Garcia Bridge projects.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The total amount requested is $43,130.51 which would be paid
out of Gas Tax Funds._
RESOLUTION NO. 44-91
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO
REGARDING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROVIDED BY JOHN WALLACE
AND ASSOCIATES IN REGARD TO THE SYCAMORE ROAD BRIDGE AND
THE LEWIS AVENUE BRIDGE
WHEREAS', John Wallace and Associates claim to have incurred
approximately $22,943 in 'additional costs for the Sycamore Road
Bridge project. Neither the City nor Caltrans executed a formal
contractamendment for a change order with John Wallace and
Associates. Discussions were initiated with staff in 1989 and were
expressed in a letter from John Wallace and Associates to Henry
Engen on March 20, 1990 for the City to pursue reimbursement of the
extra costs required for completion. John Wallace claims he was
verbally authorized to do the work, neither the City nor Caltrans
have agreed to his claim. The City agrees that it will, with John
Wallace and Associates, aggressively seek reimbursement from
,Caltrans for the add tional ' funds claimed to be owned. The City
further agrees to match all monies reimbursed from Caltrans for
payment on a' one-to-one basis for'` a total combined payment not to
exceed $22,943 .
WHEREAS, in the matter of the Lewis `Avenue Bridge,the City
shall pay to John Wallace and Associates the total of an
outstanding invoice in the amount of $1,283.51 at which time the
contract for this project will be terminated.
NOW, THEREFORE, ;BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Atascadero
does .agree to the above stipulations.
On motion by Councilmember and
seconded by Councilmember the foregoing Resolution
is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ADOPTED:
ATTEST: CITY OF ATASCADERO
LEE DAYKA, City Clerk ROBERT B. LILLEY, Mayor
•
ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO
AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES
FOR THE DESIGN OF A BRIDGE AND ROAD APPROACHES
AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING
OF THE
GARCIA ROAD BRIDGE OVER GRAVES CREEK
BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
CITY OF ATASCADERO BRIDGE NO. 49C-383
Article II, Engineer's Fee, is modified as follows:
1. Paragraph 1; the fee for engineering services for design is
changed from a sum not to exceed $25, 720. 00 to a sum not to exceed
$34,724 . 00.
2 . The fee adjustments are justified by an explanation provided in
two letters provided by John L. Wallace & Associates which are
provided as backup information to this contract; however, the
letters have no authority with respect to this contract.
3 . The City will work with John L. Wallace & Assoc. to diligently
pursue the reimbursement of the remaining money claimed to be owed
John L. Wallace & Associates from Caltrans. JLWA has the •
obligation to provide information necessary to substantiate the
claim for additional money. City files will be available to JLWA as
a source of information; however, City staff is not available to
compile past records.
4 . John L. Wallace shall complete all engineering work on the
bridge within 60 from the notice to proceed. JLWA will diligently
pursue final approval within 120 days from the notice to proceed.
ACCEPTED AND AGREED this day of 1991.
CITY: CONSULTANT:
CITY OF ATASCADERO,
a municipal corporation
By By
Robert B. Lilley, Mayor John L. Wallace
ATTEST:
By
• Lee Dayka, City Clerk
ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO •
AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES
FOR THE DESIGN OF A BRIDGE AND ROAD APPROACHES
AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING
OF THE
ATASCADERO CREEK - SAN ANDRES AVENUE
BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
CITY OF ATASCADERO BRIDGE NO. 49C-159
Article II, Engineer's Fee, is modified as follows:
1. Paragraph 1; the fee for engineering services for design is
changed from a sum not to exceed $29, 207 . 00 to a sum not to exceed
$39, 107 .
2 . The fee adjustments are justified by an explanation provided in
two letters provided by John L. Wallace & Associates which are
provided as backup information to this contract; however, the
letters have no authority with respect to this contract.
3 . The City will work with John L. Wallace & Assoc. to diligently
pursue the reimbursement of the remaining money claimed to be owed
John L. Wallace & Associates from Caltrans. JLWA has the •
obligation to provide information necessary to substantiate the
claim for additional money. City files will be available to JLWA as
a source of information; however, City staff is not available to
compile past records.
4 . John L. Wallace shall complete all engineering work on the
bridge within 60 from the notice to proceed. JLWA will diligently
pursue final approval within 120 days from the notice to proceed.
ACCEPTED AND AGREED this day of 1991.
CITY: CONSULTANT:
CITY OF ATASCADERO,
a municipal corporation
By By
Robert B. Lilley, Mayor John L. Wallace
ATTEST:
By
• Lee Dayka, City Clerk •
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item: B-10
Through: Ray Windsor, City Manager Meeting date: 5/28/91
From: Michael McCain, Acting Fire Chief
SUBJECT
Weed abatement contract - Bid #91-6
,I
RECOMMENDATION l
Recommend awarding of contract for`hand work and tractor work to
Vines of Life Landscape Care
BACKGROUND
Bids for the 'weed abatement contract were opened 5/14/91, by Lee
Dayka, City Clerk. As indicated on the attached bid summary sheet,
seven bids,were submitted.
Based on the lower cost of administration, the ability of a single
contractor to complete all work, and the`provision' for the greatest
discount for timely payment, it appears to be in the best interest to
award the 1991 weed abatement contract to Vines of Life Landscape
Care.
This award is subject to an inspection of the contractors equipment
on-5/31/91. The inspection is to verify to the fire 'department that
the contractor can meet the demands of this bid with quality
equipment and adequate fire prevention safeguards. If this contractor
fails to satisfy the fire department inspection, the bid shall be
awarded, subject to fire department inspection, to Mr. Jack Bridwell:
FISCAL IMPACT
Funds are budgeted annually to cover costs of the weed abatement
program and fees are recovered through assessments on property tax
bills.
BID SUMMARY
TO: Peggy Green
Fire Departme
FROM: Lee Dayka
City Clerk
BID NO. : 91-6
OPENED : 5/14/91 2:00 A.M.
PROJECT: 1991 Weed Abatement
The following proposals were received and opened as follows:
Name & Address of Bid Price Discounts
Contractor Part I Part II Available
(Tractor) (Weed-Eater)
Pacific Fence Co. 25.00/hr. No bid 1.5%
P.O. Box 99 15.00/1/2 hr.
Morro Bay, CA 93443
Vines of Life Landscape 27.50/hr. 15.50/hr. 5.0%
1879 Brighton, #B 14.50/1/2 hr. 7.00/1/2 hr.
Grover City, CA 93433
Young Brothers Const. 30.00/hr. 17.00/hr. -0-
PO. Box 1176 20.00/1/2 hr. 8.50/1/2 hr.
Atascadero, CA 93423
Jack Bridwell 30.00/hr. 16.00/hr -0-
11600 Viejo Camino 20.00/l/2hr. 10.00/l/2hr.
Atascadero CA 93422
Greg Rosenthal Const. 36.00/hr. 18.00/hr. 1.0$
840 Fawn Lane 18. 00/1/2 hr. 9.00/1/2 hr.
Paso Robles, CA 93446
B&H Communications 40.00/hr. 18.75/hr. 1.0%
P.O. Box 92 25.00/1/2 hr. 11.00/1/2 hr.
Santa Margarita, CA 93453
Brett's Tractor Service; 55.00/hr. 30.00/hr. -0-
735 Walnut Drive 40.00/1/2 hr. 20:00/1/2 hr.
Paso Robles, CA 93446
Attachments: 7 proposals
•
of atascadero
Purchasing Agent
650,j Palma Avenue
Atascadero , CA 93422
NOTICE OF 910 AWARD
I =sue Date
Bid Pio .
Resolu-. ion No .
You are hereby notified that the commodities ander services
listed have been awarded to you subject to the terms and
conditions of the bid number shown and to the General Conditions
Of this Notice of Bid Award ;
V
E
N
D
0
R
ITEM 01JANT17Y UNIT DESCRIPTICN PRICE
Purchasing Departmert
.9,/
Vendor ' ; Recresentative
..one
REPORT TO CITY COUNCII.
CITY OF ATASCAUERO Agenda Item: C-1
Through: Ray Windsor, City Manager Meeting date: 5/28/91
From: MichaelMcCain, Acting Fire Chief ''-
SUBJECT
Weed abatement public hearing
RECOMMENDATION:
Recommend action by motion, i.e., "I move that the Fire Chief or his
authorized representatives are ordered to abate the nuisance of
noxious or dangerous weeds on the lots identified in Resolution No.
30-91."
BACKGROUND:
As art of the weed abatement process, the Ci Council is'required to
p p _ City
hear objections to the proposed removal of weeds, rubbish, and other
combustible material. . This hearing allows any affected property owner
to protest the proposed abatement of hazards on his property.
After hearing the objections, Council overrules or allows any
objections. This can be done by resolution or motion. I recommend
action by motion, i.e., "I move we (allow -- overrule) the objection to
the proposed removal of noxious or dangerous weeds on the lots
identified."
After disposing of the objections, or if no objections are made, the
Council orders the abatement of the nuisance. This also can be done
by motion or resolution.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Costs involved in administering this program are recovered through
the administrative fee charged to parcels abated by the City contractor.
•
RESOLUTION NO. 30-91
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ATASCADERO DECLARING WEEDS A PUBLIC NUISANCE
AND COMMENCING PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ABATEMENT OF SAID
NUISANCES
The City Council of the City of Atascadero, County of
San Luis Obispo, State of California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE as
follows :
SECTION 1 . That weeds growing or potentially could grow, and
rubbish, refuse and dirt upon public and private property
hereinafter described, constitute or could constitute a
public nuisance and are hereby declared to be such, for the
reason that such weeds upon maturity will bear wingy or downy
seeds, will attain such a large growth as to become a fire
menace when dry, will be otherwise noxious or dangerous, or
will constitute or potentially could constitute dry grass,
stubble, brush, litter or other flammable material thereby
creating a hazard to public health.
SECTION 2 . The description of the parcels of lots of private
• 1 property upon which, or in front of which, said nuisances
exist, according to the official Assessment Map of said City
of Atascadero, are set in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto
and hereby incorporated herein by reference as though here
fully set forth.
SECTION 3 . The City Clerk is hereby ordered and directed to
mail written notice of the proposed abatement to all persons
owning property described in this resolution in accordance
with Section 6-13 .04 of City Ordinance No. 61.
SECTION 4 . The time at which the City Council shall hear and
consider all objections or protests to the required removal
of said noxious or dangerous weeds, or other flammable
material will be at 7 :00 p.m. on May 28, 1991.
On motion by Councilperson Borgeson, and seconded by
Councilperson Shiers, the foregoing Resolution is hereby
adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote:
AYES : Councilmembers Dexter, Nimmo, Borgeson, Shiers and
Mayor Lilley
NOES: None
• ABSENT: None
Resolution No. 30-91
Page 2
ADOPTED: April 23, 1991
CITY OF ATASCADERO
By:
ROBERT L LEY, OR
ATT�rS�:
LEE DAY M. , Cit ; Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ARTH R MO ON
City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
MICHAEL MCCAIN
Acting Fire Chief
RESOLUTION NO. 30-91
WEED ABATEMENT EXHIBIT A-ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER/STREET 1
028-021 -001 SYCAMORE ROAD 028-051 -045 SFPEFiADO
(
028-021 -002 SYCAMORE ROAD 028-051 -049 ARIZONA
028-021 -004 SYCAMOREROAD 028-051 -050 ARIZONA
028-021 -009 SYCAMOREROAD 028-051 -051 ARIZONA
028-021 -010 SYCAMORE ROAD 028-051 -052 ARIZONA
028-021 -011 SYCAMORE ROAD 028-051 -055 SEPERADO
028-021 -015 SYCAMORE ROAD 028-051 -056 SEPEAADO
028-021 -018 SYCAMORE ROAD 028-051 -057 SEPERADO
028-021 -022 SYCAMOREROAD 028-052-013 ESTRADA
028-021 -028 SYCAMORE ROAD 028-052-017 ESTRADA
028-031 -008 SOLEDAD ROAD 028-052-018 ESTRADA
028-031 -009 SOLEDAD ROAD 028-052-020 ARIZONA
028-032-003 SYCAMORE ROAD 028-052-032 ESTRADA
028-032-006 SYCAMOREROAD 028-052-033 ESTRADA
028-032-012 SOLEDAD ROAD 028-052-037 ARIZONA
028-032-013 SOLEDAD ROAD 028-052-038 ESTRADA
028-032-017 HIDALGO 028-061 -002 SEPERADO
028-032-018 HIDALGO 028-061 -005 SEPERADO
028-032-019 HIDALGO 028-061 -009 SEPERADO
028-032-020 HIDALGO 028-061 -013 SEPERADO
028-032-034 SYCAMORE ROAD 028-061 -017 ESTRADA
028-032-035 SYCAMOREROAD 028-061 -018 ESTRADA
028-032-042 HIDALGO 028-061 -019 ESTRADA
028-032-043 SYCAMOREROAD 028-061 -020 ESTRADA-
028-032-044 HIDALGO 028-061 -021 ESTRADA
028-041 -001 SOLEDAD ROAD 028-061 -023 ESTRADA
028-041 -005 SOLEDAD ROAD 028-061 -028 ESTRADA
�( 028-042-001 HIDALGO 028-061 -031 ESTRADA
028-042-002 HIDALGO 028-061 -041 SEPERADO
028-042-003 HIDALGO 028-061 -042 SEPERADO
028-042-005 HIDALGO 028-061 -047 SEPERADO
028-042-006 HIDALGO 028-061 -049 ESTRADA
028-042-008 HIDALGO 028-062-002 ARIZONA
028-042-015 MIRAMON 028-062-006 ARIZONA
028-042-018 MIRAMON 028-062-011 ESTRADA
028-042-022 MIRAMON 028-062-020 ESTRADA
028-042-032 MIRAMON 028-062-021 ARIZONA
028-042-042 MIRAMON 028-062-030 ARIZONA
028.042-049 MIRAMON 028-062-032 ARIZONA
028-042-050 MIRAMON 028-062-033 ARIZONA
028-042-051 MIRAMON 028-062-038 ARIZONA
028-042-054 HIDALGO 028-062-041 ESTRADA
028-042-055 HIDALGO 028-071 -001 SAN JACINTO
028-051 -014 SEPERADO 028-071 -002 TRAFFIC WAY
028-051 -016 SAN ANSELMO 028-071 -006 TRAFFIC WAY
028-051 -018 SANANSELMO 028-071 -009 DCLOFES
028-051 -030 ARIZONA 028-071 -012 SAN JACINTO
028-051 -031 ARIZONA 028-071 -015 VISCANO
028-051 -035 ARIZONA 028-071 -027 TRAFFIC WAY
028-051 -036 SANANSELMO 028-071 -028 DCLORES
028-051 -038 SEPERADO 028-071 -029 SAN JACINTO
028-051 -042 ARIZONA 028-071 -032 VISf.ANO
028-051 -043 ARIZONA 028-071 -033 TRAFFIC WAY
�' 028-051 -044 SEPERADO 028-071 -034 VISCANO
WEED ABATEMENT EXHIBIT A-ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER/STREET
023-071 -035 VwANO 028-141 -024 SAN ANSELMO
028-071 -036 VGC,ANO 028-141 -025 ARENA
028-071 -037 DOLORES 028-141 -029 ESTRADA
028-071 -039 VI-ANO 028-141 -031 ARENA
028-071 -040 VISCANO 028-141 -032 ESTRADA
028-072-001 SAN JACINTO 028-141 -033 ESTRADA
028-072-002 SAN JACINTO 028-141 -034 ARENA
028-084-002 TRAFFIC WAY 028-151 -003 YERBA
028-091 -003 BUENA 028-151 -024 YERBA
028-091 -005 BUENA 028-151 -025 YERBA
028-092-001 SYCAMORE ROAD 028-151 -026 YERBA
028-092-004 SYCAMORE ROAD 028-151 -027 DOLORES
028-092-012 SYCAMORE ROAD 028-151 -031 MANANITA
028-092-024 SYCAMOFRE ROAD 028-151 -034 MANANITA
028-093-012 MIRAMON 028-151 -037 MANANITA
028-093-016 MIRAMON 028-151 -042 MANANITA
028-093-026 BUENA 028-151 -047 YERBA
028-093-033 SYCAMORE ROAD 028-151 -048 YERBA
028-093-037 WDALGO 028-151 -051 MANANITA
028-093-039 MIRAMON 028-151 -055 MANANITA
028-093-040 SYCAMORE ROAD 028-151 -056 MANANITA
028-093-044 BUENA 028-152-013 MANANITA
028-093-045 BUENA 028-152-024 SAN JACINTO
028-101 -001 MIRAMON 028-152-040 SAN JACINTO
028-101 -002 MIRAMON 028-152-049 SAN JACINTO
028-101 -003 MIRAMON 028-152-050 SAN JACINTO
028-103-008 ALAMO 028-152-058 MANANITA
028-103-009 TRAFFIC WAY 028-152-065 MANANITA
028-103-012 TRAFFIC WAY 028-152-066 MANANITA
028-103-013 ALAMO 028-161 -001 SAN VICENTE
028-103-014 TRAFFIC WAY 028-161 -011 SAN VICENTE
028-131 -007 SYCAMORE 028-161 -014 SAN JACINTO
028-131 -016 SYCAMORE 028-161 -015 SAN JACINTO
028-131 -018 SYCAMORE 028-161 -022 SAN JACINTO
028-131 -022 SYCAMORE 028-161 -023 SAN VICENTE
028-131 -025 SYCAMORE 028-161 -029 SAN VICENTE
028-131 -026 SYCAMORE 028-161 -030 SAN VICENTE
028-131 -027 SYCAMORE 028-161 -031 SAN VICENTE
028-131 -034 SYCAMORE 028-162-003 SAN VICENTE
0 2 8-131 -0 3 5 SYC:AAAC1FiE 0 28-162-006 SAN VICENTE
028-132-021 SYCAMORE 028-162-007 SAN VICENTE
028-132-023 SYCAMORE 028-162-008 SAN VICENTE
028-132-026 SYCAMORE 028-162-013 VISCANO
028-132-028 SYCAMORE 028-162-014 VISCANO
028-132-029 SYCAMORE 028-162-015 VISCANO
028-141 -001 ESTRADA 028-162-016 VISCANO
028-141 -002 ESTRADA 028-162-021 VISCANO
028-141 -004 ESTRADA 028-162-023 SAN VICENTE
028-141 -005 ESTRADA 028-162-025 VGCANO
028-141 -011 ESTRADA 028-162-026 VISCANO
028-141 -015 ARENA 028-162-031 VISCANO
028-141 -020 YERBA 028-162-032 VISCANO
028-141 -021 ARENA 028-162-035 VISCANO
028-141 -023 AREA 028-171 -002 VISCANO
1
WEED ABATEMENT EXHIBIT A-ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER/STREET 3
028-171 -005 VISCANO 028-19 2-05 0 ALAMO
028-171 -008 VISCANO 028-192-051 BARRENDA
028-171 -009 VISCANO 028-192-053 ALAMO
028-171 -011 VISCANO 028-192-054 TRAFFIC WAY
028-172-001 VALENTINA 028-192-055 ALAMO
028-172-005 DOLORES 028-192-056 ALAMO
028-172-013 VALENTINA 028-192-057 TRAFFIC WAY
028-172-015 VALENTINA 028-201 -001 VIA AVENUE
028-172-026 DOLORES 028-201 -004 VIAAVENUE
028-172-032 ALAMO 028-21 1 -006 ENSENADA
0 28-181 -002 VALENTINA 028-212-001 CAP67PANO
028-181 -003 VALENTINA 028-212-003 CABRILLO
028-181 -008 VALENTINA 028-212-004 CABRILLO
028-181 -009 VALENTINA 028-212-005 CAPGlPANO
028-181 -012 SAN PEDRO 028-212-006 CAP61PAM
028-181-013 SAN PEDRO 028-213-003 CABRILLO
028-181 -014 SAN PEDRO 028-213-009 MAGDALENA
028-181 -016 SAN PEDRO 028-213-011 MAGDALENA
028-181 -018 SAN PEDRO 028-213-018 MERCEDES
028-181 -019 SAN PEDRO 028.
28-213-019 MERCEDES
028-181 -021 ALAMO 028-213-020 MERCEDES
028-181-022 ALAMO 028-213-021 CAPGIPANO
028-181 -026 VALENTINA 028-213-022 MERCEDES
0 28-181 -027 VALENTINA 028-214-001 MAGDALENA
028-181 -028 VALENTINA 028-214-002 MAGDALENA
028-181 -029 VAL.ENTINA 028-214-018 MERCEDES
028-181 -030 VALENTINA 028-215-014 MERCEDES
028-182-001 AFM 028-215-016 MERCEDES
028-182-002 ARROYO 028-215-017 MERCEDES
028-182-005 SAN PEDRO 028-241 -001 CORTEZAVENUE
028-182-009 SAN PEDRO 028-241 -002 CORTEZAVENUE
028-182-010 ARR(M 028-241 -007 CORTEZAVENUE
028-182-017 ALAMO 028-242-005 CURBARIL
028-182-020 ALAMO 028-242-006 CURBARIL
028-182-022 A 028-242-007 CURBARIL
028-182-023 SAN PEDRO 028-242-008 CURBARIL
028-182-025 ALAMO 028-251 -001 SANANSEL.MO
028-182-026 ALAMO 028-251 -007 SANARDO
028-182-027 SAN PEDRO 028-251 -008 DOLORES
028-182-031 ARROYO 028-251 -009 SANARDO
028-191 -008 TRAFFIC WAY 028-251 -014 SAN ANSELMO
028-191 -010 TRAFFIC WAY 028-251 -018 SAN ANSELMO
028-192-005 ALAMO 028-251 -019 SANANSELMO
028-192-006 ALAMO 028-251 -020 SANAN>SELMO
028-192-007 ALAMO 028-251 -021 SAN ANSELMO
028-192-014 TRAFFIC WAY 028-251 -023ARENA
028-192-015 TRAFFIC WAY 028-251 -024 SANARDO
028-192-024 BARRENDA 028-251 -025 SANARDO
028-192-032 ALAMO 028-251 -026 SANARDO
028-192-035 ALAMO 028-251 -029 SANARDO
028-192-043 HONDA 028-251 -030 SANARDO
028-192-044
ALAMO 0 2 8-2 51 -0 31 SANARDO
0 2 3-19 2-0 47 BARRENDA 028-261 -009 SAN ARDO
0 28-192-049 ALAMO 028-261 -010 SANADO
WEED ABATEMENT EXHIBIT A-ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER/STREET - 4
028-261 -011 SANARDO 028-292-014 DCLORES
028-261 -019 SANARDO 028-292-015 DCLORES
023-26-1 -020 ARENA 028-292-01 6 CURVADOCIRCLE
1
028-261 -022 SANARDO 028-292-017 NAVIDAD
028-261 -023 DOLORES 028-292-018 SAN JACINTO
028-261 -026 YERBA 028-292-019 SAN JACINTO
028-261 -027 YERBA 028-301 .006 DULZURA
028-261 -028 YERBA 028-301 -010 DULZURA
028-261 -031 YERBA 028-301 -012 SAN JACINTO
023-261 -033 ARENA 028-301 -013 SAN JACINTO
028-271 -006 SANANSELMO 028-301 -016 SAN JACINTO
028-271 -007 DOLOF:r=S 028-301 -018 SAN JACINTO
028-271 -008 SANANSELMO 028-301 -020 SAN JACINTO
028-271 -009 DOLORES 028-301 -022 SAN JACINTO
028-271 -013 DOLORES 028-301 -025 SAN JACINTO
028-271 -014 DCLORES 028-301 -026 SAN JACINTO
028-271 -017 SANANSELMO 028-301 -029 DOLORES
028-271 -018 SAN ANSELMO 028-301 -031 DULZURA
028-27-1 -023 SANANSELMO 028-301 -032 DULZURA
028-271 -024 SANANSELMO 028-301 -033 DULZURA
028-271 -025 SANANSELMO 028-301 -034 DOLORES
028-271 -026 SANANSELMO 028-301 -035 DOLORES
028-271 -028 SANANSELAAO 028-301 -036 SAN JACINTO
028-271 -029 DCLORES 028-301 -039 SAN JACINTO
028-271 .030 DCLORES 028-311 -003 BRIO
028-271 -031 DOLORES 028-311 -004 ROSARIO
0 28-271 -03 2 DOLOFIES 028-311 -008 ROSARIO
028-281 -001 CURVADO CIRCLE 028-311 -013 DULZURA
028-281 -002 CURVADO CIRCLE 028-311 -015 DULZURA
028-281 -005 ELVERANO 0 28-311 -025 DULZURA
028-281 -010 ELVERANO 028-311 -028 DULZURA
028-281 -011 NAVIDAD 028-311 -029 DULZURA
028-282-002 NOGkES 028-311 -035 DULZURA
028-282-004 NOGALE S 028-311 -036 ROSARIO
028-282-013 ELVERANO 028-311 -037 ROSARIO
028-282-015 DOLORES 028-311 -040 BAJADA
028-282-021 ELVERANO 028-311 -042 ROSARIO
028-282-023 028-321 -004 G*CFK)
028.282-024 ELVERANO 028-321 -009 ROSARIO
028-282-025 ELVERANO 028-321 -010 ROSARIO
028-282-027 ELVERANO 028-321 -011 ROSARIO
028-291 -001 CURVADO CIRCLE 028-321 -017 ARI:KNO
028-291 -002 DCLORES 028-321 -018 ARROYO
028-291 -003 DOLORES 028-321 -021 ROSARIO
028-291 -004 DOLORES 028-321 -024 C -10
028-291 -007 CURVADOCIRCLF 028-321 -025 ROSARIO
028-291 -009 CURVADOCIRCLE 028-321 -029 AFRM
028-321 -032 R�
028-291 -010 ���C�� 028-321 -034 AFiR0Y0
028-292-001 ' 028.321 -035 A�
028-292-005 DOLOFIES
023-292-006 NAVIDAD 028-322-001 ROSARIO
028-292-009 NAMDAD 028-322-002 iOSAR10
BARRENDA
028-292-010 SAN JACINTO 028-322-003 ROSARIO
;
028-292-013 NAVIDAD 028-322-008 Rip
WEED ABATEMENT EXHIBIT A-ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER/STREET
028-322-014 ALAMO 028-353-008 MAGDALENA
028-322-015 ALAMO 028-353-009 MAGDALENA
028-322-021 ALAMO 028-353-011 MAGDALENA
028-322-024 BARRENDA 028-354-002 MAGDALENA
028-322-025 BARRENDA 028-354-003 MAGDALENA
028-322-030 ALAMO 028-354-006 MAGDALENA
028-322-031 ROSARIO 028-354-007 MAGDALENA
028-322-032 ALAMO 028-354-009 MAGDALENA
028-322-035 ALAMO 028-354-010 MAGDALENA
028-322-036 ALAMO 028-355-008 MERCEDES
028-322-037 ALAMO 028-355-010 MERCEDES
028-322-038 ROSARIO 028-355-013 MERCEDES
028-322-039 ALAMO 028-355-014 MERCEDES
028-322-040 ROSARIO 028-355-015 MERCEDES
028-322-041 BARRENDA 028-361 -002 TRAFFIC WAY
028-331 -004 ROSARIO 028-361 -008 ENSENADA
028-331 -005 ROSARIO 028-361 -009 ENSENADA
028-331 -006 ROSARIO 028-361 -010 ENSENADA
0 28-331 -00 9 BARRENDA 028-361 -014 ENSENADA
028-331 -012 BARRENDA 028-361 -017 TRAFFIC WAY
028-332-001 BARRENDA 028-361 -027 ENSENADA
028-332-002 BARRENDA 028-361 -028 ENSENADA
028-332-003 BARRENDA 028-371 -004 ENSENADA
028-332-004 BARRENDA 028-371 -005 ENSENADA
028-332-008 BARRENDA 028-371 -009 CAPISTRANO
028-332-019 HONDA 028-371 -011 CAPISTRANO
028-332-020 BARRENDA 028-371 -012 CAPIS7RANO
028-332-025 HONDA 028-371 -016 CAPISTRANO
028-332-027 BARRENDA 028-371 -017 CAPISTRANO
028-332-033 BARRENDA 028-371 -021 CAPISTRANO
028-341 -009 ENSENADA 028-371 -030 ENSENADA
028-341 -011 ENSENADA 028-372-006 CAPISTRANO
028-341 -012 ENSENADA 028-372-010 MAGNOLIA
028-341 -018 VIA 028-372-011 MAGNOLIA
028-341 -021 TRAFFIC WAY 028-372-014 MAGNOLIA
028-351 -001 ENSENADA 028-372-015 MAGNOLIA
028-351 -002 ENSENADA 028-372-019 MAGNOLIA
028-351 -003 ENSENADA 028-372-022 CAP6 RANO
028-351 -004 ENSENADA 028-372-026 CAPISTRANO
028-351 -005 ENSENADA 028-372-029 MAGNOLIA
028-351 -006 CAPGT W40 028-381 -015 MAGNOLIA
028-351 -009 CAPISTRANO 028-381 -017 MAGNOLIA
028-351 -011 CABRILLO 028-381 -023 MAGNOLIA
028-351 -012 CAMP" 028-381 -024 MAGNOLIA
028-352-001 CAPISTRANO 028-381 -025 MAGNOLIA
028-352-005 CABRILLO 028-382-005 MMES
028-352-015 CABRILLO 028-382-006 MERCEDES
028-352-017 CABRILLO 028-382-012 MERCEDES
028-352-019 CAPISL'RANO 028-382-013 MERCEDES
028-353-002 CABRILLO 028-382-014 MERCEDES
028-353-003 CABRILLO 028-391 -001 DCLORES
028-353-004 CABRILLO 028-391 -002 DOLORES
028-353-006 CABRILLO 028-391 -006 DCL_CRES
028-353-007 MAGDALENA 028-391 -007 VIVO
WEED ABATEMENT EXHIBIT A-ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER/STREET 6
023-401 -005 TAMPICO
028-401 -006 VERNALIS
028-401 -009 VERNALIS
028-401 -011 ARAGON
028-401 -013 ? I
028-401 -014 ARAGON
028-401 -015 ARAGCN
028-401 -016 AURORA
028-401 -019 AURORA
028-401 -020 AURORA
028-40-1 -024 AURORA
028-411 -001 VERNALIS
028-411 -004 VERNALIS
028-411 -007 GABARDA
028-411 -008 GABARDA
028-411 -009 GABARDA
028-411 -013 CURBARIL
028-411 -014 CURBARIL
028-411 -015 CURBARIL
028-411 -021 GABARDA
028-411 -023 GABARDA
028-411 -028 CURBARIUACACIA
028-412-002 AURORA
028-412-004 AURORA
028-412-006 AURORA
028-412-007 TAMPICO
028-412-008 AURORA
028-413-003 CORTEZ
028-413-006 CORTEZ
4
WEED ABATEMENT EXHIBIT A-ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER/STREET -
029-061 -004 SCNOR4
0 29-01 1 -007 NCGALES 029-061 -033 BARRENDA
029-011 -016 SAN ANSELMO 029-061 -034 BARRENDA
029-011 -017 NOGALES 029-061 -041 BARRENDA
029-011 -041 NOGALES 029-061 -043 TRAFFIC WAY
029-012-002 SANANSELMO 029-061 -045 TRAFFIC WAY
029-012-003 SANANSELMO 029-062-001 BARRENDA
029-012-015 ROSITA 029-062-010 BARRENDA
029-012-016 SANANSELMO 029-062-014 TRAFFIC WAY
029-012-017 SANANSELMO 029-062-037 BAJADA
029-012-021 ROSTA 029-062-038 BARRENDA
029-022-021 ROSrTA 029-071 -005 NOGALES
029-022-025 ROSITA 029-071 -010 NOGALES
029-022-026 ROSITA 029-071 -016 POSARIO
029-023-010 ROSITA 029-071 -032 ROSARIO
029-023-011 ROSITA 029-081 -003 TUNITAS
029-023-012 TRANQUILLA 029-081 -005 TUNITAS
029-024-007 NOGALES 029-081 -006 TUNITAS
029-024-009 NOGALES 029-105-004 PINAL
029-024-014 ROSITA 029-105-007 SERENACOURT
029-024-017 TRANQUILLA 029-105-014 CAPISTRANO
029-024-018 ROSITA 029-105-023 MERCEDES
029-031 -002 NOGALES 029-105-027 MERCEDES
029-031 -005 NOCAM 029-105-028 MERCEDES
029-031 -006 NOGALES 029-105-034 CAPISTRANO
029-031 -007 ELVERANO 029-105-035 SERENACOURT
029-031 -008 NOGALES 029-105-036 SERENACOURT
029-031 -010 NOGALES 029-105-037 SERENA COURT
029-032-006 VIDA 029-105-038 SERENACOURT
029-032-007 NAVIDAD 029-111 -002 PINAL
029-032-009 ELVERANO 029-111 -003 PINAL
029-032-010 ADA 029-111 -004 PINAL
029-032-014 ELVERANO 029-111 -005 PINAL
029-041 -002 VIDA 029-111 -006 PINAL
029-041 -004 VIDA 029-121 -001 PINAL
029-041 -006 ADA 029-121 -002 PINAL
029-041 -010 VIDA 029-121 -005 MALEZA
029-041 -012 VIDA 029-121 -006 MALEZA
029-041 -013 VIDA 029-121 -007 MALEZA
029-041-015 VIDA 029-121 -008 MALEZA
029-041 -016 VIDA 029-121 -010 MALEZA
029-041 -018 VIDA 029-121 -015 MALEZA
029-041 -023 SAN JACINTO 029-121 -01 7 MALEZA
029-041 -026 SAN JACINTO 029-121 -017 MALEZA
029-042-003 VIDA 029-121 -018 MALEZA
029-042-004 VIDA 029-121 -019 MALEZA
029-042-006 VIDA 029-121 -020 MALEZA
029-042-007 VIDA 029-121 -021 MALEZA
029-042-008 VIDA 029-121 -022 MALEZA
029-042-009 VIDA 029-131 -002 MALEZA
029-051 -008 DULZURA 029-131 -012 PINAL
029-051 -009 DULZURA 029-131 -019 PINAL
029-051 -022 NOGALFS 029-131 -020 PINAL
029-051 -030 SAN JACINTO 029-131 -021 PINAL
WEED ABATEMENT EXHIBIT A-ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER/STREET 8
029-131 -023 MALEZA 029-153-017 CASTANO
029-131 -025 MALEZA 029-161 -007 ESCARPA
029-131 -026 MALEZA 029-161 -008 ESCARPA
029-131 -027 CASTANO 029-161 -009 SONORA
029-131 -028 CASTANO 029-171 -001 SONORA
029-131 -029 MALEZA 029-171 -002 SONCRA
029-131 -030 MALEZA 029-171 -003 SONORA
029-132-002 CASTANO 029-171 -006 SONORA
029-132-004 CaSrANO 029-171 -007 VALLE
029-132-010 CORTEZ 029-171 -00 8 VALLE
029-132-0`12 CORTEZ 029-171 -009 VALLE
029-132-013 CORTEZ 029-171 -011 VANE
029-132-016 OORTEZ 029-171 -012 VALLE
029-141 -004 CASTANO 029-171 -013 VALLE
029-141 -005 PINAL 029-171 -014 VALLE
029-141 -006 CASTANO 029-171 -015 VALLE
0 29-141 -007 CASTANO 029-171 -016 VALLE
029-141 -008 CASTANO 029-171 -017 VALLE
029-141 -010 CURBARIL 029-171 -018 VALLE
029-141 -012 PINAL 029-171 -020 SONORA
029-141 -013 CURBARIL 029-171 -021 9ONORA
029-141 -014 CURBARIL 029-171 -022 SONORA
029-141 -017 CURBARIL 029-181 -008 CORTINA
029-141 -021 CASTANO 029-181 -009 CORTINA
0 29-141 -022 CURBARIL 029-181 -021 SONORA
029-141 -023 PINAL 029-181 -022 SQA
029-142-004 CASfANO 029-181 -023 SONOM
029-142-005 CASTANO 029-181 -029 CORTINA
029-142-028 CASTANO 029-181 -034 CORTINA
029-142-029 CORTEZ 029-181 -038 CORTINA
029-142-030 CORTEZ 029-181 -039 CORTINA
029-151 -001 VALLE 029-181 -043 CORTINA
029-151 -003 MESAL 029-181 -045 SONORA
029-151 -004 VALLE 029-181 -049 SONORA
029-151 -005 VALLE 029-191 -003 PINAL
029-151 -012 VALLE 029-191 -008 PINAL
029-151 -020 VALLE 029-191 -009 PINAL
029-151 -022 VALLE 029-191 -011 PINAL
029-151 -023 YESAL 029-191 -014 CORTINA
029-151-025 VALLE 029-191 -017 CORTINA
029-152-004 CURBARIL 029-191 -026 COR11NA
029-152-009 CASTANO 029-191 -029 CORTINA
029-152-010 CASTANO 029-191 -032 CORTINA
029-152-012 CASTANO 029-191 -034 PINAL
029-152-013 CASTANO 029-191 -035 PINAL
029-152-017 YESAL 029-191 -03 8 CORTINA
029-152-01 9 YESAL 029-191 -039 CORTINA
029-152-021 YESAL 029-191 -040 CORTINA
029-152-022 CASTANO 029-191 -041 PINAL
029-152-023 CASTANO 029-191 -042 CORTINA
0 29-1 52-0-24 CASTANO 029-191 -044 PINAL
029-152-025 CURBARIL 029-191 -046 PINAL
029-152-026 YESAL 029-191 -047 PINAL
029-153-001 CASTANO 029-201 -004- PALOMAR
WEED ABATEMENT EXHIBIT A-ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER/STREET G
029-201 -007 PALOMAR 029-241 -033 NOGALES
029-201 -010 CASrANO 029-241 -034 NOGALES
029-202-003 CASTANO 029-241 -035 NOGALES
029-202-005 CASTANO 029-241 -036 FRESNO
029-202-016 CASTANO 029-252-007 OLMEDA
029-202-017 CASTANO 029.252-026 OLMEDA
029-221 -001 CAYUCOS 029-253-007 TUNITAS
029-211 -001 ROSITA 029-253-008 TUNITAS
029-211 -002 ROSITA 029-253-014 TUNITAS
029-211 -004 ROSrrA 029-253-031 TUNITAS
029-211 -007 ROSMA 029-261 -001 CAYUOOS
029-211 -008 SAN ANSELMO 029-261 -019 EL CAMINO REAL
029-211 -021 SAN ANSELMO 029-261 -020 EL CAMINO REAL
029-211 -024 SANANSELMO 029-262-004 VALDEZ
029-211 -028 ROSITA 029-262-006 ELCAMINO REAL
029-211 -032 ROSMA 029-262-007 ELCAMINO REAL
029-211 -034 ROSMA 029-262-046 HERMOSILLA
029-212-008 SANANSELMO 029-262-059 VALDEZ
029-212-021 ANSELMO/LOBOS 029-271 -001 EL CAMINO REAL
029-212-024 SANANSELMO 029-271 -004 ELCAMINO REAL
029-222-002 HERMOSILLA 029-271 -014 SAN JACINTO
029-222-003 HERMOSILLA 029-271 -016 HERMOSILLA
029-222-009 CAYUOOS 029-271 -017 HERMOSILLA
029-222-010 CAYUOOS 029-271 -023 HERMOSILLA
029-222-011 CAYUOOS 029-271 -024 HERMOSILLA
029-222-012 CAYUOOS 029-272-009 HERMOSILLA
029-222-013 CAYUOOS 029-272-013 ENCIMA
029-222-014 CAYUOOS 029-272-018 HERMOSILLA
029-222-015 CAYLCOS 029-272-023 ENCIMA
029-222-016 CAYUOOS 029-281 -005 FRESNO
029-222-025 CAYUCOS 029-281 -028 OLMEDA
029-222-031 HERMOSILLA 029-281 -029 OLMEDA
029-222-032 HERMOSILLA 029-281 -034 SAN JACINTO
029-222-033 CAYUOOS 029-281 -038 FRESNO
029-222-034 CAYUOOS 029-281 -042 FRESNO
029-222-036 HERMOSILLA 029-281 -048 FRESINO
029-231 -002 NOGALES 029-291 -003 FRESNO
029-231 -007 NOGALES 029-291 -008 MARIQUITA
029-231 -014 NOGALES 029-291 -014 FRESNO
029-23.2-001 VADA 029-291 -016 FRESNO
029-233-004 SAN JACINTO 029-291 -031 R064100
029-233-005 SAN JACINTO 029-291 -032 MARIQUITA
029-233-007 NOGALES 029-292-003 OLMEDA
029-233-017 NOGALES 029-292-004 OLMEDA
029-233-019 NOGALES 029-292-024 MARIQUITA
029-233-023 VIDA 029-301 -011 OLMEDA
029-233-024 VIDA 029-301 -023 OLMEDA
029-233-025 NOGALES 029-301 -039 OLMEDA
029-241 -002 NOGALES 029-302-002 PALMA
029-241 -011 FRESNO 029-302-003 PALMA
029-241 -023 NOGALES 029-302-010 PALMA
029-241 -024 NOGALES 029-302-011 PALMA
029-241 -025 NOGALES 029-302-017 EL CAMINO REAL
029-241 -032 FRESNO 029-302-018 ELCAMINO REAL
WEED ABATEMENT EXHIBIT A-ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER/STREET y
029-302-028 PALMA 029-382-024 VALLE
029-302-030 PALMA 029-382-025 VALLE
029-302-038 PALMA 029-382-028 VALLE
029-302-039 PALMA 029-382-030 ENCINAL
029-302-050 PALMA 029-382-031 ENCINAL
029-311 -006 OLMEDA
029-31 1 -009 OLMEDA
029-311 -031 PALMAAVE.
029-311 -038 OLMEDA
029-311 -039 OLMEDA
029-312-018 PALMA
029-312-025 PALMA
029-312-033 PALMA
029-312-034 PALMA
029-321 -011 OLMEDA
029-321 -016 ROSARIO
029-321 -017 ROSARIO
029-322-006 RIDGEWAYCOURT
029-322-011 TRAFFIC WAY
029-322.015 ROSARIO
029-322-019 RIDGEWAY COURT
029-351 -001 VALLE
029-352-001 VALLE
029-353-001 ESCARPS
029-353-003 VALLE
029-353-004 VALLE
029-361 -013 MERCEDES f
029-361 -014 CAPISTRANO
029-361 -029 MERCEDES
029-371 -010 SOMBRILLA
029-371414 VALLE
029-371 -016 SOMBRILLA
029-371 -017 SOMBRILLA
029-371 -018 VALLE
029-371 -019 SOMBRILLA
029-371 -020 VALLE
029-371 -021 SOMBRILLA
029-371 -022 VALLE
029-371 -023 SOMBRILLA
029-371 -027 SOMBRILLA
029-371 -028 VALLE
029-371 -029 SOMBRILLA
029-371 -030 VALLE
029-371 -031 VALLE
029-381 -001 VALLE
029-382-001 VALLE
029-382-005 VALLE
029-382-006 ENCINAL
029-382-007 ENCINAL
029-382-018 VALLE
029-382-019 VALLE
029-382-020 VALLE
T
029-382-021 VALLE
029-382-023 VALLE
WEED ABATEMENT EXHIBIT A-ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER/STREET 1
030-011 -006 SOMBRILLA 030-071 -016 JUNIPERO
030-011 -013 SANTAYSABEL 030-071 -017 PALOMAR
030-011 -016 SANTAYSABEL 030-071 -029 JUNIPERO
030-011 -017 SANTAYSABEL 030-071 -032 JUNIPERO
030-01 1 -030 SANTAYSABEL 030-071 -033 JUNIPERO
030-021 -005 SOMBRILLA 030-071 -034 PALOMAR
030-021 -020 SOMBRILLA 030-071 -036 PALOMAR
030-031 -002 ENCINAL 030-071 -037 PALOMAR
030-031 -003 ENCINAL 030-081 -005 ELCAMINOREAL
030-031 -007 VALLE 030-081 -016 SANTAYSABEL
030-031 -009 CURBARIL 030-081 -020 ELCAMINOREAL
030-031 -012 CURBARIL 030-081 -023 ELCAMINOREAL
030-031 -016 ENCINAL 030-091 -017 SANTAYSABEL
030-031 -017 ENCINAL 030-091 -034 SOMBRILLA
030-031 -018 ENCINAL 030-091 -034 SOMBRILLA
030-041 -004 SOMBRILLA 030-091 -036 SOMBRILLA
030-041 -005 SOMBRILLA 030-091 -036 SOMBRILLA
030-041 -006 CURBARIL 030-091 -040 SOMBRILLA
030-041 -009 SOMBRILLA 030-091 -040 SOMBRILLA
030-041 -010 SOMBRILLA 030-091 -049 SANTA YSABEL
030-041 -014 SOMBRILLA 030-091 -049 SANTAYSABEL
030-041 -017 SOMBRILLA 030-101 -003 SOMBRILLA
030-051 -003 VALLE 030-101 -006 CURBARIL
030-051 -004 VALLE 030-101 -028 SANTAYSABEL
030-051 -009 PALOMAR 030-101 -035 CURBARIL
030-051 -011 JUNIPERO 030-101 -039 CURBARIL
030-051 -012 JUNIPERO 030-101 -045 PUEBLO
030-051 -018 JUNIPERO 030-101 -048 PUEBLO
030-051 -019 PALOMAR 030-101 -049 SOMBRILLA
030-051 -020 PALOMAR 030-111 -015 PALOMAR
030-051 -021 JUNIPERO 030-111 -016 PALOMAR
030-051 -022 VALLE 030-111 -017 PALOMAR
030-051 -027 VALLE 030-111 -024 PALOMAR
030-051 -030 VALLE 030-111 -025 PALOMAR
030-051 -031 VALLE 030-111 -029 PALOMAR
030-051 -032 VALLE 030-111 -032 JUNIPERO
030-051 -036 VALLE 030-111 -037 PALOMAR
030-051 -037 PALOMAR 030-111 -038 PALOMAR
030-051 -038 JUNIPERO 030-111 -039 PALOMAR
030-051 -039 JUNIPERO 030-111 -040 PALOMAR
030-061 -011 CURBARIL 030-111 -042 PALOMAR
030-061 -01.8 JUNIPERO 030-121 -001 SANTAYSABEL
030-061 -019 JUNIPERO 030-121 -004 SANTAYSABEL
030-061 -022 JUNIPERO 030-121 -026 SANTAYSABEL
030-061 -023 JUNIPERO 030-121 -027 SANTAYSABEL
030-061 -025 CURBARIL 030-121 -040 ELCAMINOREAL
030-061 -027 CURBARIL 030-131 -006 SANTAYSABEL
030-061 -038 JUNIPERO 030-131 -008 SANTAYSABEL
030-061 -039 JUNIPERO 030-131 -023 SINALOA
030-061 -044 CURBARIL 030-131 -024 SINALOA
030-061 -050 VALLE 030-131 -027 SINALOA
030-071 -001 JUNIPERO 030-131 -034 SANTAYSABEL
030-071 -006 JUNIPERO 030-131 -035 SANTAYSABEL
030-071 -012 JUNIPERO 030-131 -041 SANTA YSABEL
WEED ABATEMENT EXHIBIT A-ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER/STREET 12
030-131 -044 SINALOA 030-181 -061 \ESA
030-131 -049 SANTAYSABEL 030-182-001 ARDILLA
030-132-003 SINALOA 030-182-003 ARDILLA
030-132-024 ELCAMINO REAL 030-191 -008 SANTA LUCIA
030-132-029 ELCAMINO REAL 030-191 -011 ATAS.MALL
030-132-03 9 SINALOA 030-191 -021 EL CAMINO REAL
030-141 -016 JUNIPERO 030-191 -039 SANTA LUCIA
030-141 -017 JUNIPERO 030-191 -041 SANTA LUCIA
030-141 -018 JUNIPERO 030-191 -043 EL CAMINO REAL
030-141 -020 CURBARIL 030-192-018 ATAS.MALL
030--141 -022 CURB ARIL 030-201 -001 ATAS.MALL
030-141 -023 CURBARIL 030-201 -015 SANTAYNEZ
030-141 -029 CURBARIL 030-212-016 MARCHANT
030-141 -030 CURBARIL 030-213-008 ALCANTARA
030-141 -037 CURBARIL 030-221 -009 ALCANTARA
030-141 -038 CURBARIL 030-221 -020 ALCANTARA
030-141 -041 EL CAMINO REAL 030-221 -023 ALCANTARA
030-141 -044 JUNIPERO 030-222-032 MARCHANT
030-141 -045 JUNIPERO 030-222-044 ELCAMINO REAL
030-141 -049 JUNIPERO 030-231 -019 EL CAMINO REAL
030-141 -053 JUNIPERO 030-231 -020 EL CAMINO REAL
030-141 -064 EL CAMINO REAL 030-231 -021 EL CAMINO REAL
030-141 -065 EL CAMINO REAL 030-232-015 ESPERANZA
030-141 -06 8 CURBARIL 030-232-016 ESPERANZA
030-141 0 71 JUNIPERO 030-232-024 ESPERANZA
030-141 -072 JUNIPERO 030-232-025 MARCHANT
030-141 -074 EL CAMINO REAL 030-232-026 MARCHANT
030-141 -075 EL CAMINO REAL 030-233-008 MERCHANT :
030-151 -003 JUNIPERO 030-233-009 MARCHANT
030-151 -005 JUNIPERO 030-241 -005 EL CAMINO REAL
030-151 -006 JUNIPERO 030-241 -012 EL CAMINO REAL
030-151 -019 PALOMAR 030-241 -013 EL CAMINO REAL
030-151 -021 PALOMAR 030-241 -057 SAN LUIS
030-151 -024 PALOMAR 030-241 -058 SAN LUIS
030-151 -028 PALOMAR 030-241 -059 SAN LUIS
030-151 -029 JUNIPERO 030-241 -060 SAN LUIS
030-151 -033 PALOMAR 030-241 -061 SAN LUIS
030-151 -091 ELCAMINO REAL 030-241 -064 EL CAMINO REAL
030-152-004 EL CAMINO REAL 030-241 -065 EL CAMINO REAL
030-152-023 PALOMAR 030-242-013 MARCHANT
030-152-025 PALOMAR 030-242-025 MARCHANT
030-152-026 PALOMAR 030-242-034 CCNSTA%CIA
030-152-032 PALOMAR 030-242-036 CONSTANCIA
030-152-034 PALOMAR 030-242-037 CANSTfANCIA
030-152-037 PALOMAR 030-251 -005 MRIAM
030-161 -001 SAN PALO 030-251 -008 ARDILLA
030-161 -005 SAN PALO 030-251 -019 ARDILLA
030-172-001 ARDILLA 030-251 -020 ARDILLA
030-172-006 ARDILLA 030-251 -021 ARDILLA
030-172-010 ARDILLA 030-251 -022 M34ADO
030-172-017 ARDILLA 030-251 -024 M31AM
030-181 -052 El CAMINO REAL 030-251 -025 ARDILLA
030-181 -056 MB=A 030-251 -027 ARDILLA
030-181 -058 \mA 030-251 -030 ARDILLA
WEED ABATEMENT EXHIBIT A-ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER/STREET 13
030-251 -031 VBVADO 030-332-004 AGUILA
030-251 -032 Veom 030-332-005 AGUILA
030-251 -033 ARDILLA 030-332-010 AGUILA
030-261 -004 VENADO 030-332-012 SANTA LUCIA
030-261 -011 ARDILLA 030-332-018 SANTA LUCIA
030-261 -013 ARDILLA 030-332-020 AGUILA
030-261 -018 VENADO 030-332-021 SANTA LUCIA
030-261 -020 ARDILLA 030-332-024 AGUILA
030-261 -021 ARDILLA 030-341 -005 SANTA LUCIA
030-271 -016 V84ADO 030-341 -006 SANTA LUC{A
030-271 -021 ARDILLA 030-341 -010 NACIMIENTO
030-271 -024 VBVADO 030-341 -013 ATAS.MALL
030-271 -025 V9VAD0 030-341 -036 SANTA LUCIA
030-281 -006 SANTAYNEZ 030-351 -011 CRISTOBAL
030-281 -011 SANTAYNEZ 030-351 -015 TECORIDA
030-281 -019 SANTAYNEZ 030-351 -016 TECORIDA
030-281 -030 NAVAJOA 030-351 -029 CRISTOBAL
030-281 -033 NAVAJOA 030-351 -035 TECORIDA
030-282-007 NAVAJOA 030-352-003 TECORIDA
030-282-015 ATASCADEROAVE. 030-352-006 TECORIDA
030-282-017 ATASCADEAOAVE. 030-352-017 ATASCADEROAVE
030-282-038 NAVAJOA 030-352-018 ATASCADEROAVE
030-283-005 ATASCADEROAVE 030-352-023 ATASCADEROAVE.
030-291 -013 MORROROAD 030-352-025 ATASCADERO AVE.
030-291 -015 MORROROAD 030-352-030 ATASCADEROAVE
030-291 -019 SANANDRES 030-352-031 ATASCADEROAVE.
030-291 -021 MORROROAD 030-371 -010 SANTAYNEZ
030-292-017 MARCHANT 030-371 -011 SANTAYNEZ
030-292-022 SANANDRES 030-371 -015 SANTAYNEZ
030-292-024 SANANDRES 030-371 -018 SANTAYNEZ
030-292-027 SANANDRES 030-371 -022 SANTAYNEZ
030-292-038 MARCHANT 030-371 -025 SANTAYNEZ
030-292-039 SANANDRES 030-372-008 ATASCADEROAVE
030-292-041 ALCANTARA 030-372-024 SERRA
030-292-045 ALCANTARA 030-373-007 ATASCADEROAVE
030-292-060 LOS ARBOLES 030-373-008 ATASCADEAOAVE
030-301 -016 CRISTOBAL 030-373-019 SERRA
030-301 -022 CRISTOBAL 030-373-021 SERRA
030-301 -044 SANANDRES 030-381 -004 PALOMAR
030-301 -048 MARCHANT 030-381 -005 PALOMAR
030-30i -054 MARCHANT 030-381 -006 PALOMAR
030-301 -055 MARCHANT 030-391 -003 ELCORTE
030-301 -056 MARCHANT 030-401 -001 ELCORTE
030-311 -001 VENADO 030-401 -005 LA LINIA
030-311 -002 CHAPLIN 030-411 -001 ARCADE
030-311 -005 CHAPLIN 030-411 -010 ARCADE
030-311 -011 CHAPLIN 030-412-022 SANTAFE
030-311 -012 CHAPLIN 030-412-024 SANTA FE
030-321 -008 PESCADOCT. 030-413-005 ELDORADO
030-321 -012 PESCADOCT. 030-413-007 SANTA FE
030-321 -013 PESCADOCT 030-421 -001 LA LINIA
030-321 -015 PESCADOCT. 030-421 -005 LA LINIA
030-331 -006 AGUILA 030-422-009 LA LINIA
030-331 -008 VBVADO 030-422-011 LA LINIA
WEED ABATEMENT EXHIBIT A-ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER/STREET 14
030-431 -007 PNOSOLO
030-442-001 ELBORDO
030-442-008 ELBORDO
030-442-009 ELBORDO
030-442-010 ELBORDO
030-442-011 ELBORDO
030-451 -001 LAS LOMAS
030-451 -002 LAS LOMAS
030-451 -003 LAS LOMAS
030-461 -011 EL CAMINO REAL
030-461 -016 EL CAMINO REAL
030-461 -045 MUSSELMAN
030-462-003 MUSSELMAN
030-462-004 MUSSELMAN
030-462-005 MUSSELMAN
030-462-006 MUSSELMAN
030-471 -003 ELBORDO
030-471 -006 LAS LOMAS
030-471 -007 LASI.OMAS
030-472-009 ELCAMINO REAL
030-472-010 ELCAMINO REAL
030-483-002 LAS LOMAS
030-483.003 LASLOMAS
030-483-004 LAS LOMAS
030-483-005 LAS LOMAS
030-483-006 LAS LOMAS
030-483-008 LASLCMAAS
030-491 -001 PNOSOLO
030-491 -002 PRINCIPAL
030-491 -004 PNOSOLO
030-491 -008 PNOSOLO
030-491 -009 PNOSOLO
030-501 -003 SCLANO
030-502-015 LA L.INIA
030-511 -001 ELCENTRO
030-512-002 CASADA
030-512-003 ELCAMINO REAL
030-512-008 ELCENTRO
030-513-004 ELCENTRO
030-521 -023 ELCENTRO
030-52'2-001 EL DORADO
030-522-002 ELDORADO
030-522-005 ELDORADO
030-522-027 ELDORADO
030-522-028 ELDORADO
030-522-029 ELDORADO
030-522-030 ELCENTRO
030-523-002 LA LINIA
030-523-010 LA LINIA
WEED ABATEMENT EXHIBIT A-ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER/STREET 1
031 -012-004 AGUILA 031 -043-023 NAVAK)A
031 -012-007 MOLETA 031 -043-024 SANANDRES
031 -012-009 MOLETA 031 -043-025 SANANDRES
031 -012-010 VIOLETA 031 -043-027 SANTAYNEZ
031 -012-012 MOLETA 031 -043-028 SANANDRES
031 -012-016 AGUILA 031 -043-029 SANTAYNEZ
031 -012-017 AGUILA 031 -051 -007 NAVAJOA
031 -012-019 CORM 031 -051 -009 NAVAJOA
031 -012-020 AGUILA 031 -051 -021 NAVAJOA
031 -012-022 CHAUPLIN 031 -051 -023 SANANDRES
031 -012-023 CHAUPLIN 031 -051 -033 NAVANOA
031 -012-024 CHAUPLIN 031 -051 -034 SAN ANDRES
031 -012-025 CHAUPLIN 031 -051 -038 MORRORD
031 -013-005 VIOLETTA 031 -051 -039 MORRORD
031 -013-006 MOLETA 031 -051 -042 MORRORD
031 -013-027 VIOLETA 031 -051 -043 MORRORD
031 -013-028 VIOLETA 031 -051 -044 MORRORD
031 -013-029 VIOLETA 031 -051 -047 MORRORD
031 -021 -005 OORTA 031 -051 -049 MORRORD
031 -021 -006 SANTA LUCIA 031 -051 -051 NAVAJOA
031 -023-001 VIOLETA 031 -051 -058 SANANDRES
031 -023-006 SANTA LUCIA 031 -052-017 MORRORD
031 -023-010 SANTA LUCIA 031 -052-018 MORRO RD
031 -023-011 SANTA LUCIA 031 -052-021 MORRORD
031 -023-012 SANTA LUCIA 031 -052-031 MORRORD
031 -023-015 SANTA LUCIA 031 -052-032 MORRORD
031 -023-016 SANTA LUCIA 031 -052-007 ATASCADERO AVE
031 -023-017 SANTA LUCIA 031 -052-024 ATASCADERO AVE
031 -023-018 SANTA LUCIA 031 -061 -006 CRISTOBAL
031 -023-021 VIOLETA 031 -061 -010 TECORIDA
031 -023-024 SANTA WCIA 031 -061 -022 CRISTOBAL
031 -023-025 SANTA LUCIA 031 -061 -023 CRISTOBAL
031 -041 -016 SAN MARCOS 031 -061 -025 TECORIDA
031 -041 -019 CARMELITA 031 -061 -030 CRISTOBAL
031 -041 -021 SAN MARCOS 031 -061 -032 CRISTOBAL
031 -041 -022 SAN MARCOS 031 -061 -034 CRISTOBAL
031 -041 -023 CARMELTTA 031 -061 -037 TECORIDA
031 -041 -027 CARMELITA 031 -061 -039 TECORVA
031 -042-003 CARMELITA 031 -061 -040 CRISTOBAL
031 -042-004 CARMELITA 031 -062-002 ATASCADEROAVE
031 -042-005 SANTAYNEZ 031 -062-003 TECORIDA
031 -042-006 SANTAYNEZ 031 -062-004 TECORIDA
031 -042-012 CARMELITA 031 -062-006 TECORIDA.
031 -042-013 CARMELITA 031 -062-008 TECORIDA
031 -042-014 CARMELITA 031 -062-009 TECORIDA
031 -042-016 SANTA YNEZ 031 -062-016 TEOORIDA
031 -043-006 NAVAJOA 031 -062-018 TECORVA
031 -043-010 NAVA)OA 031 -062-019 ATASCADERO AVE
031 -043-011 NAVAJOA 031 -071-017 CRISTOBAL
031 -043-013 NAVAJOA 031 -071-018 CRISTOBAL
031 -043-014 NAVAJOA 031-071 -019 CRISTOBAL
031 -043-015 SANTA YNEZ 031 -071 -021 MARCHANTAVE
031 -043-018 NAVAJOA 031 -071 -023 CRISTOBAL
C31 -043-019 SANTA YNEZ 031 -071 -024 MARCHANTAVE
WEED ABATEMENT EXHIBIT A- ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER/STREET i E
031 -071 -029 MARCHANT AVE 031 -111 -003 MIRA FLORES
031 -071 -030 MARCHANT AVE 031 -111 -004 MIRA FLORES
031 -011 -031 MARCHANTAVE 031 -111 -014 EL RETIRO
031 -071 -034 MARCHANT AVE 031 -111 -015 EL RETIRO
031 -081 -003 MARCHANT 031 -112-004 ALTAVISTA
03-1 -081 -007 CURBARIL 031 -112-005 ALTA VISTA
031 -081 -016 CORCMAR 031 -112-00 6 ALTA VISTA
031 -081 -019 MARCHANT 031 -112-007 ALTA VISTA
031 -081 -020 CURBARIL 031 -112-009 ALTA VISTA
031 -031 -023 CURBARIL 031 -112-010 ALTA VISTA
031 -082-003 MARCHANT 031 -112-011 ALTA VISTA
03-1 -082-020 CORCMAR 031 -112-012 ALTA VISTA
031 -082-030 CORCMAR 031 -112-012 ALTA VISTA
03-1 -082-032 COAClvAAR 031 -112-012 NAVARETTE
031 -082-034 CURBARIL 031 -112-013 ALTA VISTA
031 -082-035 CURBARIL 031 -112-014 ALTA VISTA
031 -082-038 CURBARIL 031 -113-001 ALTA VISTA
031 -091 -001 CHAUPUN 031 -113-002 ALTA VISTA
031 -091 -004 ATAJO 031 -113-003 ALTA VISTA
031 -091 -007 CHAUPUN 031 -113-006 ALTA VISTA
031 -091 -009 CHAUPLIN 031 -113-007 ALTA VISTA
031 -091 -010 CHAUPUN 031 -113-008 ALTA VISTA
031 -091 -011 CHAUPUN 031 -113-010 ALTA VISTA
031 -091 -015 CHAUPUN 031 -113-011 ALTA VISTA
031 -091 -017 ATAJO 031 -113-012 ALTA VISTA
031 -091 -018 ATAJO 031 -114-001 ALTA VISTA
031 -091 -019 ATAJO 031 -114-00 2 ALTA VISTA
031 -092-005 ENCINO 031 -114-004 NAVARETTE
031 -092-011 EN= 031 -114-005 ALTAVISTA
031 -092-011 ENCINO 031 -115-001 LINDA VISTA
031 -092-014 ENCINO 031 -115-002 LINDA VISTA
031 -092-018 ENCINO 031 -115-003 LINDA VISTA
031 -101 -001 ENCINO 031 -115-007 LOS CERRITOS
031 -101 -002 ENCINO 031 -115-008 LOS CERRITOS
031 -101 -003 ENC INO 031 -121 -001 LINDA VISTA
031 -101 -004 ENCINO 031 -121 -002 LINDA VISTA
031 -101 -006 BVCINO 031 -122-001 LINDA VISTA
031 -101 -008 ENCINO 031 -122-002 LINDA VISTA
031 -101 -011 ENCINO 031 -122-003 LINDA VISTA
031 -101 -012 ENCINO 031 -122-004 LINDA VISTA
031 -101 -013 ENCW0 031 -122-005 LOS CERRITOS
031 -102-001 ENCINO 031 -122-006 LOS CERRITOS
031 -102-002 ENCINO 031 -122-007 LOS CERRITOS
031 -104-001 SANTA LUCIA 031 -122-008 LINDA VISTA
031 -104-003 NAVARETTE 031 -122-009 NAVARETCE
031 -104-008 SANTA LUCIA 031 -122-010 NAVARETTE
031 -104-009 SANTA LUCIA 031 -123-001 LOS CERRITOS
031 -104-010 SANTA LUCIA 031 -123-003 LOS CERRTTOS
031 -104-014 SANTA LUCIA 031 -123-005 LOS CERRI TOS
031 -104-020 SANTA LUCIA 031 -123-007 SAN ANDRES
031 -104-02-1 SANTA LUCIA 031 -123-009 NAVARETTE
031 -104-022 SANTA LUCIA 031 -123-011 LOS CERRITOS
031 -111 -001 MIRA FLORES 0 31 -123-01 2 LOS CERRITOS
031 -111 -002 MIRA FLORES 031 -124-001 NAVARETTE
WEED ABATEMENT EXHIBIT A- ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER/STREET 1
031 -124-006 NAVARETTE 031 -141 -033 SAN MARCOS
031 -124-008 NAVARETTE 031 -141 -040 CURBARIL
031 -124-009 NAVARETTE 031 -141 -041 SAN MARCOS
031 -125-001 LARGA 031 -141 -044 SAN MARCOS
031 -125-004 LARGA 031 -141 -045 SAN MARCOS
031 -131 -001 HERMOSA 031 -141 -048 SAN MARCOS
031 -131 -002 LARGA 031 -141 -04 9 SAN MARCOS
031 -131 -003 HERMOSA 031 -141 -050 SAN MARCOS
031 -131 -004 LARGA 031 -141 -051 SAN MARCOS
031 -131 -006 PEQUINA 031 -142-003 CARMELITA
031 -131 -007 PEQUINA 031 -142-004 CARMEUTA
031 -131 -008 PEQUINA 031 -142-017 CARMELITA
031 -131 -009 PEGUINA 031 -142-018 CARMEL ITA
031 -131 -010 PEQUINA 031 -142-019 CARMELITA
031 -131 -011 LARGA 031 -142-024 CARMEL.ITA
031 -132-002 LARGA 031 -142-026 CARMELITA
031 -132-004 PEQUINA 031 -142-027 CARMEUTA
031 -132-006 LARGA 031 -142-030 CARMEUTA
031 -132-007 LARGA 031 -151 -003 CARMEUTA
031 -132-008 PEQUINA 031 -151 -004 CARMEUTA
031 -132-009 PEQUINA 031 -151 -012 SANTA YNEZ
031 -132-010 PEOUINA 031 -151 -013 SANTA YNEZ
031 -132-011 PEQUINA 031 -151 -014 SANTAYNEZ
031 -133-001 LARGA 031 -151 -016 SANTA YNEZ
031 -133-002 LARGA 031 -151 -017 CARMEUTA
031 -133-003 LARGA 031 -151 -018 CARMEUTA
031 -133-005 LARGA 031 -151 -019 CARMEL.ITA
031 -133-012 LARGA 031 -151 -021 CARMEUTA
031 -133-013 LARGA 031 -151 -022 CARMEUTA
031 -133-014 LARGA 031 -151 -024 CARMELITA
031 -134-003 EL DESCANSO 031 -151 -024 CARMEUTA
031 -134-005 EL DESCANSO 031 -151 -026 CARME ITA
031 -134-006 R DESCANSO 031 -151 -027 CARMEUTA
031 -134-007 ELDESCANSO 031 -151 -027 SANTA YNEZ
031 -134-008 EL DESCANSO 031 -151 -028 SANTA YNEZ
031 -134-009 EL DESCANSO 031 -151 -029 SANTA YNEZ
031 -134-010 EL DESCANSO 031 -151 -030 SANTA YNEZ
031 -134-017 SAN C LEMENTE 031 -151 -032 SANTA YNEZ
031 -134-020 SAN CLF.MENTE 031 -151 -034 SANTA YNEZ
031 -134-021 SAN CLEMENTE 031 -152-003 SANt'A YNEZ
0 31 -13 4-0 2 2 SAN C LEMENTE 031 -152-012 SANTA YNEZ
031 -141 -003 CURBARIL 031 -152-016 SANTA YNEZ
031 -141 -004 CURBARIL 031 -152-020 SANTA YNEZ
031 -141 -005 CURBARIL 031 -152-021 SANTA YNEZ
031 -141 -006 CURBARIL 031 -152-022 SANTAYNEZ
031 -141 -007 SAN MARCOS 031 -152-023 SANTA YNEZ
031 -141 -008 SAN MARCOS 031 -152-026 SANTA YNEZ
031 -141 -012 SAN MARCOS 031 -153-005 MORAO RD
031 -141 -013 SAN MARCOS 031 -161 -004 CURBARIL
031 -141 -014 SAN MARCUS 031 -161 -008. ATASCADERO AVE
031 -141 -016 SAN MARCOS 031-161 -024 CURBARIL
031 -141 -022 CARMELITA 031 -161 -039 ATASCADERO AVE
031 -141 -023 C,,ARMEUTA 031 -161 -042 ATASCADEERO AVE
031 -141 -030 CURBARIL 031-161 -074- MORRO RD
WEED ABATEMENT EXHIBIT A- ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER/STREET 1 8
031 -161 -075 MORRORD 031 -202-020 SAN CLEMENTE
031 -161 -079 MORRORD 031 -202-022 SANMARCOS .
031 -161 -081 MORRO RD 031 -202-023 SAN CLEMENTE
031 -161 -083 MORRO RD 031 -202-024 SAN CLEMENTE
031 -171 -001 MARCHANT 031 -202-025 SAN CLEMENTE
031 -171 -005 MARCHANT 031 -202-026 SAN MARCOS
031 -171 -007 MARCHANf 031 -202-028 SAN CLEMENTE
031 -171 -010 CURBARIL 031 -211 -004 CURBARIL
031 -171 -017 CURBARIL 031 -211 -006 CURBARIL
031 -171 -018 CURBARIL 031 -211 -00 7 CURBARIL
031 -171 -022 CURBARIL 031 -211 -008 CURBARIL
031 -171 -027 CURBARIL 031 -211 -009 CURBARIL
031 -181 -002 SANTA YNEZ 031 -211 -010 CURBARIL
031 -181 -004 SANTA YNEZ 031 -211 -011 CURBARIL
031 -181 -005 SANTA YNEZ 031 -221 -001 SANTA YNEZ
031 -181 -021 SANTA YNEZ 031 -221 -002 SANTA YNEZ
031 -181 -022 SANTAYNEZ 031 -221 -008 SANTAYNEZ
031 -181 -023 SANTA YNEZ 031 -221 -009 SANTA YNEZ
031 -182-007 NAVA,JOA 031 -221 -012 SANTA YNEZ
031 -182-008 NAVAJOA 031 -221 -013 SANTAYNEZ
031 -182-009 NAVAJOA 031 -221 -015 SANTAYNEZ
031 -182-029 SANTAYNEZ 031 -221 -016 SANTAYNEZ
031 -182-032 NAVAJOA 031 -221 -017 SANTAYNEZ
031 -182-033 NAVAJOA 031 -221 -019 SANTA YNEZ
031 -182-036 NAVAJOA 031 -222-009 CARMELITA
031 -182-037 NAVAJOA 031 -222-010 CARMELITA
031 -183-002 NAVAJOA 031 -222-011 CARMELITA
031 -183-024 NAVAJOA 031 -222-014 CARMELITA
031 -183-025 NAVAJOA 031 -222-019 CARMELITA
031 -183-026 NAVAJOA 031 -222-022 CARMELITA
031 -183-028 MORRORD 031 -222-023 CARMELITA
031 -183-033 MORRORD 031 -222-024 CARMELMA
031 -183-034 MORRORD 031 -222-025 CARMELITA
031 -191 -002 NAVARETTE 031 -222-027 CARMELITA
031 -191 -003 NAVARETTE 031 -231 -002 CURBARIL
031 -191 -004 NAVARETTE 031 -231 -003 CURBARIL
031 -191 -005 NAVARETTE 031 -231 -004 CURBARIL
031 -191 -006 LINDA VISTA 031 -231 -019 CURBARIL
031 -192-007 NAVARETTE 031 -231 -024 MORRORD
031 -192-014 HERMOSA 031 -231 -028 MORRO FID
031 -19.2-015 HERMOSA 031 -231 -034 SANTAYNEZ
031 -192-016 NAVARETTE 031 -231 -037 SANTA YNEZ
031 -192-017 NAVARETTE 031 -231 -038 SANTAYNEZ
031 -192-018 NAVARETTE 031 -231 -039 SANTA YNEZ
031 -192-019 NAVAREn E 031 -231 -040 SANTA YNEZ
031 -201 -002 SAN CLEMENTE 031 -241 -002 AaJCENA
031 -201 -003 SAN CLEMENTE 031 -241 -004 AZUCENA
031 -202-004 SANCLEMENTE 031 -241 -007 AZJCEt A
031 -202-005 SAN CLEMENTE 031 -241 -010 AZ JCENA
031 -202-006 SANMIARCOS 031 -241 -011 AMAPOA
031 -202-008 SAN MARCOS 031 -241 -012 AMAPOA
031 -202-017 SAN MARCCS 031 -24-1 -013 AMAPOA
031 -202-018 SAN MARCOS 031 -241 -019 AMAPOA
031 -202-019 SAN MARCOS 031 -241 -024 AZUCENA
WEED ABATEMENT EXHIBIT A ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER/STREET 1
031 -242-012 MORRORD 031 -291 -019 PORTCLA
031 -242-013 MORRORD 031 -291 -020 PORTOLA
031 -242-016 MORRORD 031 -291 -021 MORRORD
031 -251 -001 ATASCADEROAVE 031 -291 -022 MORRORD
031 -251 -003 ATASCADEROAVE 031 -291 -023 MORRORD
031 -251 -004 ATASCADERO AVE 031 -291 -026 MORRO RD
031 -251 -005 ATASC,ADERO AVE 031 -291 -027 SANTA YNEZ
031 -251 -006 ATASCADEROAVE 031 -291 -029 SANTAYNEZ
031 -251 -011 SAN FRANCISCO 031 -301 -001 AZUCENA
031 -251 -012 SAN FRANCISCO 031 -301 -006 AZUCENA
031 -251 -016 SAN FRANCISCO 031 -301 -009 AZUCE A
031 -251 -023 AZUCENA 031 -301 -011 AMAPOA
031 -251 -026 AZUCE A 031 -301 -020 AZUCENA
031 -251 -027 AZUCENA 031 -301 -021 AZUCENA,
031 -251 -028 AZUCENA 031 -301 -023 AMAPOA
031 -251 -029 AZLICEM 031 -301 -024 AMAPOA
031 -251 -032 ATASCADER0 AVE 031 -301 -025 AZUCBVA
031 -251 -038 SAN FRANCISCO 031 -301 -029 AZUCENA
031 -251 -043 AZUC %A 031 -301 -030 AMAPOA
031 -251 -047 SAN FRANCISCO 031 -302-011 MORRO RD
031 -251 -048 SAN FRANCISCO 031 -302-012 MORRO RD
031 -251 -049 ATASCADEAO AVE 031 -302-013 MORRO RD
031 -261 -001 SAN FRANCISCO 031 -302-016 MORRO RD
031 -261 -002 SAN FRANCISCO 031 -302-019 MORRO RD
031 -261 -003 SAN FRANCISCO 031 -302-033 MORRO RD
031 -261 -004 SAN FRANCISCO 031 -303-017 AMAPOA
031 -261 -005 SAN FRANCISCO 031 -311 -001 AZUCENA
031 -261 -006 SAN FRANCISCO 031 -311 -002 AZUC E A
031 -261 -010 MARCHANT 031 -311 -003 AZUCENA
031 -261 -011 MARCHANT 031 -311 -006 AZUCE A
031 -261 -015 SAN FRANCISCO 031 -31 1 -007 AZUCE A
031 -261 -019 MARCHANT 031 -311 -010 MARCHANT
031 -261 -023 SAN FRANCISCO 031 -311 -016 MARCHANT
031 -261 -028 SAN FRANCISCO 031 -311 -017 MARCHANT
031 -261 -029 MARCHANT 031 -311 -019 MARCHANT
031 -271 -013 CARMELITA 031 -311 -022 AZUC ENA
031 -271 -027 CARMELITA 031 -311 -028 MARCHANT
031 -271 -033 CARMEUTA 031 -321 -001 PORTCLA
031 -271 -038 CARMEUTA 031 -321 -002 PORTCLA
031 -27.1 -041 CARMEUTA 031 -321 -003 PORTCLA
031 -271 -042 CARMELITA 031 -321 -007 CARMELTTA
031 -271 -043 CARMEUTA 031 -321 -008 CARMEUTA
031 -271 -044 CARMEUTA 031 -321 -012 CARMELTTA
031 -271 -048 CARMEUTA 031 -331 -010 CARMELITA
031 -281 -005 PIEDRAS ALTOS 031 -331 -012 CARMEUTA
031 -281 -012 CARMEUTA 031 -331 -017 CARMELITA
031 -281 -013 PORTOLA 031 -331 -018 CARMELITA
031 -281 -014 PORTOLA 031 -341 -006 CARMEUTA
031 -281 -016 CARMELTTA 031 -341 -007 CARMEUTA
031 -281 -020 CARMEUTA 031 -341 -018 CARMEUTA
031 -281 -021 PIEDRAS ALTOS 031 -341 -019 CARMEUTA
031 -281 -022 CARMELTTA 031 -341 -020 CARMEUTA
031 -291 -002 SANTA YNEZ 031 -341 -021 CARMEUTA
031 -291 -010 PORTOLA 031 -341 -022 CARMEUTA
WEED ABATEMENT EXHIBIT A-ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER/STREET 2 C
031 -341 -024 CARMEUTA
031 -341 -025 CARMEUTA
031 -341 -027 PORTOLA
031 -351 -005 PORTOLA
031 -351 -006 PORTOLA
031 -361 -003 MORRO RD
031 -361 -008 AMAPOA
031 -361 -011 AMAPOA
031 -361 -015 AMAPOA
031 -361 -018 MORRO PO
031 -361 -019 MORRO RD
031 -361 -021 AMAPOA
031 -362-003 MARCHANT
031 -371 -010 MORRO RD
031 -371 -011 MORRO RD
031 -371 -016 MORRO RD
031 -371 -020 ELPARQUE
031 -371 -021 ELPARQUE
031 -371 -028 ELPARQUE
031 -372-001 PISMO
031 -373-001 ELPARQUE
031 -373-002 ELPARQUE
031 -373-003 ELPARQUE
031 -373-004 AVENAL.
031 -373-011 AVENAL.
031 -381 -007 MARCHANT
031 -381 -009 MARCHANT
031 -381 -010 MARCHANT
031 -381 -027 AVENAL
031 -381 -034 AVENAL.
031 -381 -035 MARCHANT
031 -381 -046 MARCHANT
031 -381 -051 MARCHANT
031 -381 -053 MARCHANT
031 -381 -055 SANTAROSA
031 -381 -056 SANTAROSA
031 -381 -063 MARCHANT
031 -381 -064 MARCHANT
II
WEED ABATEMENT EXHIBIT A- ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER/STREET 2
045-301 -002 ORTEGARD 045-401 -003 VIEJO CAMINO
045-302-005 ORTEGARD 045-401 -010 HALCCN
045-302-006 ORTEGARD 045-401 -014 HAr.CON
045-302-007 ORTEGARD 045-411 -002 ALONDRA
045-302-008 ORTEGARD 045-411 -003 ALONDRA
045-311 -001 HALCONRD 045-421 -001 SAN DIEGO RD
045-311 -002 HALCONRD 045-421 -002 SAN DIEGO RD
045-311 -003 HALCCNRD 045-421 -003 SAN DIEGO RD
045-321 -002 EL CAMINO RL 045-431 -001 SAN DIEGO RD
045-321 -003 EL CAMINO RL 045-431 -002 SAN DIEGO RD
045-321 -009 VIEJO CAMINO 045-431 -004 SAN DIEGO RD
045-321 -010 VIEJO CAMINO 045-431 -005 SAN DIEGO RD
045-321 -011 EL CAMINO RL 045-431 -007 SAN DIEGO RD
045-321 -012 EL CAMINO RL 045-441 -002 SAN RAFAEL
045-321 -013 EL CAMINO RL 045-441 -009 COLORADO RD
045-321 -015 EL CAMINO RL 045-441 -010 C'OL ORADO RD
045-321 -017 BOCINA 045-441 -013 COLORADORD
045-321 -019 BOCINA 045-441 -014 COLORADO RD
045-331 -003 EL CAMINO RL 045-441 -015 COLORADO RD
045-332-001 ELCAMINO RL 045-441 -016 COLORADORD
045-332-003 ELCAMINO RL 045-441 -017 COLORADORD
045-332-005 SANTABARBARA 045-441 -023 COLORADORD
045-332-006 SANTABARBARA 045-441 -024 CCLCRADORD
045-332-007 ELCAMINO RL 045-441 -025 COLORADORD
045-332-008 ELCAMINO RL 045-441 -026 COLORADORD
045-332-009 ELCAMINO RL 045-441 -027 COLORADORD
045-341 -003 SAN DIEGO RD 045-441 -028 COLORADO RD
045-341 -004 SAN DIEGO RD 045-441 -029 CCLORADORD
045-341 -005 SAN DIEGO RD 045-441 -031 COLORADO RD
045-342-006 VIEJO CAMINO 045-441 -032 COLORADORD
045-342-007 VIEJO CAMINO 045-451 -007 SAN RAFAEL
045-342-008 VIEJO CAMINO 045-451 -008 SAN RAFAEL
045-342-009 VIEJO CAMINO 045-451 -010 COLORADO RD
045-342-010 VIEJO CAMINO 045-451 -016 COLORADO RD
045-342-011 VIEJO CAMINO 045-451 -017 COLORADO RD
045-351 -001 EL CAMINO RL 045-451 -019 COLORADO RD
045-351 -002 EL CAMINO RL 045-451 -020 ARD
045-351 -003 EL CAMINO RL 045-451 -021 COLORADORD
045-351 -007 EL CAMINO RL 045-451 -025 COLORADO RD
045-351 -008 ELCAMINO RL 045-451 -026 COLORADORD
045-35.1 -012 EL CAMINO RL 045-451 -029 COLORADO RD
045-351 -014 EL CAMINO RL 045-451 -033 SAN DEIGO RD
045-352-006 ELCAMINO RL 045-451 -044 ATASCADEROAVE
045-353-001 SAN RAFAEL
045-353-002 WESTFRONT
045-361 -007 MESTACT
045-361 -013 CLESTACT
045-361 -016 CUESTACT
045-361 -027 SAN RAFAEL CT
045-371 -011 SANTA BARBARA
045-381 -005 LA PAZ
045-381 -006 LA PAZ
045-381 -014 LA PAZ
045-391 -002 ATASCADERORD
WEED ABATEMENT EXHIBIT A-ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER/STREET 22
049-022-002 FERROCARRILRD. 049-052-031 OBISPOROAD
049-022-009 CHICO 049-052-032 OBISPOROAD
049-023-002 FERROCARRILRD. 049-052-033 OBISPOROAD
049-023-008 FERROCARRILRD. 049-052-034 OBISPOROAD
049-031 -005 TRAFFICWAY 049-052-035 TRAFFIC WAY
049-031 -006 TRAFFIC WAY 049-052-036 TRAFFIC WAY
049-031 -007 TRAFFIC WAY 049-052-037 TRAFFIC WAY
949-031 -008 TRAFFIC WAY 049-052-038 OBISPOROAD
049-041 -005 SANTACRUZ 049-052-039 OBISPOROAD
049-041 -009 ELCAMINO REAL 049-061 -004 POTRERO ROAD
049-041 -010 ELCAMINO REAL 049-061 -006 POTRERO ROAD
049-04-1 -012 SANTA CRUZ 049-061 -008 POTRERO ROAD
049-041 -013 SANTA CRUZ 049-061 -010 TRAFFIC WAY
049-041 -014 SANTA CRUZ 049-061 -011 POTRERO ROAD
049-041 -015 SANTA CRUZ 049-061 -012 POTRERO ROAD
049-041 -016 SANTACRUZ 049-061 -014 OBISPOROAD
049-041 -017 SANTACRUZ 049-061 -021 OBISPOROAD
049-041 -018 SANTACRUZ 049-061 -022 OBISPOROAD
049-042-007 SANTA CRUZ 049-061 -023 TRAFFIC WAY
049-042-011 EL CAMINO REAL 049-061 -026 TRAFFIC WAY
049-042-013 ELCAMINO REAL 049-061 -027 TRAFFIC WAY
049-042-020 ELCAMINO REAL 049-062-006 POTRERO ROAD
049-042-023 SANTACRUZ 049-062-007 DEL RIO ROAD
049-042-024 SANTACRUZ 049-071 -006 CH)COROAD
049-042-025 ELCAMINO REAL 049-071 -008 CHICO ROAD
049-042-026 ELCAMINO REAL 049-071 -011 DEL RIO ROAD
049-051 -004 CARRIZO ROAD 049-071 -012 TRAFFIC WAY
049-051 -007 CARROO ROAD 049-071 -013 TRAFFIC WAY
049-051 -010 CARRIZO ROAD 049-0 71 -014 DEL RIO ROAD
049-051 -011 CARROO ROAD 049-071 -017 TRAFFIC WAY
049-051 -012 CARROO ROAD 049-071 -018 SAN BENITO
049-051 -014 SANTACRUZ 049-071 -019 TRAFFIC WAY
049-051 -015 SANTACRUZ 049-071 -021 SAN BENITO
049-051 -017 EL CAMINO REAL 049.071 -022 SAN BENITO
049-051 -018 CARRIZO ROAD 049-072-005 TRAFFIC WAY
049-051 -021 SANTACRUZ 049-072-006 CHICO
049-051 -022 SANTACRUZ 049-072-007 CHICO
049-051 -023 SANTACRUZ 049-073-006 DEL RIO ROAD
049-051 -024 SANTA CRUZ 049-073-009 DEL RIO ROAD
049-051 -025 SANTACRUZ 049-073-015 LA LUZ
049-052-001 TRAFFIC WAY 049-073-016 LA LUZ
049-052-002 CARRIZO ROAD 049-073-019 ARENA
049-052-003 CARRIZO ROAD 049-073-020 ARENA
049-052-005 CARRIZO ROAD 049-073-022 DEL RIO ROAD
049-052-014 CARROO ROAD 049-073-025 DR RIO ROAD
049-052-018 CARROO ROAD 049-073-031 DEL RIO ROAD
049-052-019 CARRIZO ROAD 049-073-032 DEL RIO ROAD
049-052-021 TRAFFIC WAY 049-073-034 SANANSEUWO
049-052-022 COSPOROAD 049-073-036 SANANSELMO
049-052-023 OBISPOROAD 049-073-037 DELRIO ROAD
049-052-025 CARRIZO ROAD 049-073-040 DEL RIO ROAD
049-052-027 TRAFFIC WAY 049-073-046 LA LUZ
049-052-029 CARROO ROAD 049-073-047 LA LUZ
049-052-030 CARRIZO ROAD 049-073-048 DELRIO ROAD -
WEED ABATEMENT EXHIBIT A-ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER/STREET 23
049-073-049 DEL RIO ROAD 049-092-044 SANTA CRUZ
. 049-073-050 DEL RIO ROAD 049-092-045 SANTA CRUZ
049-073-051 ARENA 049-092-046 SANTACRUZ
049-073-053 LA LUZ 049-093-006 SAN RAMON ROAD
049-073-054 LA LUZ 049-093-007 SAN RAMON ROAD
049-073-055 DEL RIO ROAD 049-093-009 ELCAMINOREAL
049-073-055 SAN ANSELMO 049-093-035 SAN RAMON ROAD
049-073-056 SANANSELMO 049-093-036 SAN RAMON ROAD
049-073-057 LA LUZ 049-101 -009 ELCAMINOREAL
049-073-058 LA LUZ 049-101 -010 ELCAMINOREAL
049-073-060 DEL RIO ROAD 049-101 -011 CARRQOROAD
049-073-061 LA LUZ 049-101 -013 CARROO ROAD
049-073-062 LA LUZ 049-101 -015 ELCAMINOREAL
049-073-063 LA LUZ 049-101 -018 CARRIZO-ROAD
049-073-064 LA LUZ 049-101 -020 CARRIZO ROAD
049-073-065 ARENA 049-101 -022 CARRIZO ROAD
049-073-066 LA LUZ 049-101 -024 CARRIZO ROAD
049-073-068 DEL RIO ROAD 049-101 -025 CARRIZO ROAD
049-073-070 DEL RIO ROAD 049.102-001 CARRIZO ROAD
049-073-071 DEL RIO ROAD 049-102-008 ELCAMINOREAL
049-073-072 DEL RIO ROAD 049-102-009 ELCAMINOREAL
049-074-001 LA LUZ 049-102-033 ELCAMINOREAL
049-074-002 LA LUZ 049-102-050 ELCAMINOREAL
049-075-001 ARENA 049-102-051 ELCAMINOREAL
049-075-002 AREA 049-102-052 OBISPOROAD
049-075-003 ARENA 049-102-053 OBISPOROAD
049-075-004 ARENA 049-102-054 OBISPOROAD
049-075-005 SANANSELMO 049-111 -001 OBISPOROAD
049-081 -001 GARCIA ROAD 049-111 -011 OBISPO ROAD
049-081 -004 GARCIAROAD 049-111 -014 DEL RIO ROAD
049-081 -005 GARCIAROAD 049-111 -018 DEL RIO ROAD
049-081 -007 GARCIAROAD 049-111 -019 DEL RIO ROAD
049-081 -008 GARCIAROAD 049-111 -020 DEL RIO ROAD
049-081 -009 GARCIARCAD 049-111 -037 OBISPOROAD
049-081 -010 GARCIA ROAD 049-112-002 EL CAMINO REAL
049-082-015 SANTACRUZ 049-112-005 DEL RIO ROAD
049-082-016 GARCIAROAD 049-112-006 DEL RIO ROAD
049-082-020 SANTACRUZ 049-112-015 SAN BENITO
049-082-021 SANTACRUZ 049-112-018 DEL RIO ROAD
049-091 -001 GARCIAROAD 049-112-019 DEL RIO ROAD
049-091 -002 GARCIAROAD 049-112-022 DEL RIO ROAD
049-091 -003 GARCIAROAD 049-112-024 DEL RIO ROAD
049-091 -004 GARCIAROAD 049-1 12-025 DEL RIO ROAD
049-092-016 SAN RAMON ROAD 049-112-026 DEL RIO ROAD
049-092-017 SAN RAMON ROAD 049-112-027 RIO RITA
049-092-020 GARCIAROAD 049-112-028 RIORITA
049-092-025 SANTACRUZ 049-112-029 RIO RITA
049-092-028 GARCIAROAD 049-112-031 SAN BENITO
049-092-029 GARCIAROAD 049-112-032 SAN BENITO
049-092-032 GARCIAROAD 049-112-034 SAN BENITO
049-092-036 SAN RAMON ROAD 049-112-036 DEL RIO ROAD
049-092-038 SANTACRUZ 049-112-037 SAN BENITO
049-092-041 SAN RAMON ROAD 049-112-038 SAN BENITO
049-092-043 SANTACRUZ 049-121 -008 LA LUZ
WEED ABATEMENT EXHIBIT A-ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER/STREET 24
049-121 -012 LA LUZ 049-131 -054 ELCAMINO REAL
049-121 -013 LA LUZ 049-131 -057 SAN RAMON ROAD
049-121 -014 LA LUZ 049-131 -058 SAN RAMON ROAD
049-121 -015 LA LUZ 049-131 -059 DEL RIO ROAD
049-121 -017 LA LUZ 049-131 -060 SAN RAMON ROAD
04 9-121 -02 0 ARENA 049-131 -061 SAN RAMON ROAD
049--121 -024 LA LUZ 049-131 -063 SAN RAMON ROAD
049-1 21 -026 LA LUZ 049-131 -066 SAN RAMON ROAD
049-12-1 -027 LA LUZ 049-131 -067 SAN RAMON ROAD
049-121 -028 LA LUZ 049-131 -068 SAN RAMON ROAD
049-121 -031 ARENA 049-131 -06 9 SAN RAMON ROAD
049-121 -032 ARENA 049-132-001 SAN RAMON ROAD
049-122-002 ARENA 049-132-002 SAN RAMON ROAD
049-122-003 ARENA 049-132-014 SAN RAMON ROAD
049-122-044 ARENA 049-132-025 SAN RAMON ROAD
049-122-006 FALDA 049-132-027 SAN RAMON ROAD
049-122-009 FALDA 049-141 -010 CONE,10
049-122-014 SAN BENITO 049-141 -023 EL CAMINO REAL
049-122-016 FALDA 049-141 -024 ELCAMINO REAL
049-122-020 FALDA 049-141 -026 ELCAMINO REAL
049-122-022 FALDA 049-141 -030 ELCAMINO REAL
049-122-023 UGA 049-141 -035 RAMONA
049--122-025 UGAROAD 049-141 -036 ELCAMINO REAL
049-122-026 ARENA 049-141 -038 RAMONA
049-122-027 LIGA ROAD 049-141 -040 ELCAMINO REAL
049-123-002 LICA 049-141 -041 ELCAMINO REAL
049-123-006 AMARGONROAD 049-141 -042 RAMONA
049-123-007 AMARGOVROAD 049-141 -044 ELCAMINO REAL
049-123-018 ARENA 049-141 -046 ELCAMINO REAL
049-123-019 AMARGON ROAD 049-142-008 RAMONA
049-123-020 AMARGCN ROAD 049-151 -00 8 EL CAMINO REAL
049-123-022 AIWA 049-151 -009 ELCAMINO REAL
049-123-023 ARENA 049-151 -016 ELCAMINO REAL
049-123-027 ARENA 049-151 -017 ELCAMINO REAL
049-123-028 AMARGCN ROAD 049-151 -020 ELCAMINO REAL
049-123-029 AMARGCN ROAD 049-151 -024 MADERA
049-123-030 AMARGCNRQAD 049-151 -025 MADERA
049-123-032 AMARGCN ROAD 049-151 -033 SAN BENITO
049-123-033 ARENA 049-151 -034 SAN BENITO
049-123-034 ARENA 049-151 -03 6 ELCAMINO REAL
049-13i -021 SAN RAMON ROAD 049-151 -037 EL CAMINO REAL
049-131 -022 EL CAMINO REAL 049-151 -043 SAN BENITO
049-131 -031 EL CAMINO REAL 049-151 -044 SAN BENITO
049-131 -032 ELCAMINO REAL 049-151 -048 SAN BENITO
049-131 -035 ELCAMINO REAL 049-151 -051 SAN BENITO
049-131 -043 SAN RAMON ROAD 049-151 -052 SAN BENITO
049-131 -044 DEL RIO ROAD 049-151 -053 SAN BENITO
049-131 -045 EL CAMINO REAL 049-151 -054 SAN BENITO
049-131 -046 EL CAMINO REAL 049-152-002 COLIMA
049-131 -047 EL CAMINO REAL 049-152-012 SAN BENTIO
049-131 -048 EL CAMINO REAL 049-152-013 SAN BENTIO
0 49-131 -060 EL CAMINO REAL 049-152-014 SAN BENITO
049-131 -062 DEL RIO ROAD 049-152-016 SAN BENTIO
049-131 -053 EL CAMINO REAL 049-152-019 SAN BENITO
WEED ABATEMENT EXHIBIT A-ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER/STREET 25
049-152-022 SAN BENITO 049-163-046 ELCAMINO REAL
049-152-026 SAN BENITO 049-163-047 ELCAMINO REAL
049-152-027 COLIMA 049-163-050 SANANSELMO
049-152-028 SAN BENITO 049-163-051 SANANSELMO
049-152-031 ELCAMINO REAL 049-163-052 SANANSELMO
049-152-033 ELCAMINO REAL 049-163-053 SANANSELMO,
049-152-035 LAUVA 049-163-056 COLIMA
049-152-036 LAUVA 049-163-057 COLIMA
049-152-038 LAUVA 049-163-058 COLIMA
049-152-039 LAUVA 049-163-064 SILLA
049-152-040 LAUVA 049-163-065 SILLA
049-152-041 LAUVA 049-163-066 ELCAMINO REAL
049-152-042 LAUVA 049-163-068 ELCAMINO REAL
049-152-043 ELCAMINO REAL 049-172-001 SANTACRUZ
049-161 -001 SILLA 049-172-00 6 SANTACRUZ
049-161 -005 COLIMA 049-172-009 SANTACRUZ
049-161 -008 SILLA 049-172-012 SANTACRUZ
049-163-003 SANANSELMO 049-172-014 SANTACRUZ
049-163-005 SANANSELMO 049-172-015 SANTACRUZ
049-163-008 COLIMA 049-172-016 SANTACRUZ
049-163-009 COLIMA 049-172-018 ROPA
049-163-010 COLIMA 049-172-019 ROPA
049-163-011 COLIMA 049-181 -005 GARCIA
049-163-012 CO LIMA 049-181 -006 SANGREGORIO
049-163-013 COLIMA 049-181 -007 GARCIA
049-163-014 COLIMA 049-182-003 GARCIA
049-163-014 SAN ANSELMO 049-182-013 GARCIA
i 049-163-015 COLIMA 049-182-015 GARCIA
049-163-016 EL CAMINO REAL 049-183-017 SANGREGORIO
049-163-019 ELCAMINO REAL 049-183-018 SANGREGORIO
049-163-021 EL CAMINO REAL 049-183-021 SAN GREOORIO
049-163-022 ELCAMINO REAL 049-183-022 SANGREGORIO
049-163-023 EL CAMINO REAL 049-183-023 SANGREGORIO
049-163-024 ELCAMINO REAL 049-183-024 SANGREGORIO
049-163-025 ELCAMINO REAL 049-191 -002 Ccw..JO
049-163-026 ELCAMINO REAL 049-191 -004 DELRIO
049-163-027 EL CAMINO REAL 049-191 -016 CONEM
049-163-028 EL CAMINO REAL 049-191 -023 MONTEREY ROAD
049-163-029 ELCAMINO REAL 049-191 -026 DEL RIO
049-163-030 ELCAMINO REAL 049-191 -027 DELRIO
049-163-031 El CAMINO REAL 049-191 -030 DELRIO
049-163-032 EL CAMINO REAL 049-191 -031 MONTEREY ROAD
049-163-033 ELCAMINO REAL 049-191 -034 OCt\EJO
049-163-034 El CAMINO REAL 049-191 -035 CCPEJO
049-163-035 El CAMINO REAL 049-191 -036 COSEJO
049-163-037 ELCAMINO REAL 049-191 -037 DEL RIO
049-163-038 CAMPBELL LANE 049-191 -038 DEL RIO
049-163-039 CAMPBELL LANE 049-201 -010 EL CAMINO REAL
049-163-040 CAMPBELL LANE 049-201 -014 EL CAMINO REAL
049-163-041 CAMPBELL LANE 049-201 -021 ELCAMINO REAL
049-163-042 ELCAMINO REAL 049-201 -024 ELCAMINO REAL
049-163-043 EL CAMINO REAL 049-201 -025 EL CAMINO REAL
049-163-044 ELCAMINO REAL 049-201 -026 RAMONA
049-163-045 EL CAMINO REAL 049-201 -03 0 EL CAMINO REAL
WEED ABATEMENT EXHIBIT A-ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER/STREET 26
049-201 -031 ELCAMINO REAL 049-223-029 MONTEREY ROAD
049-201 -032 ELCAMINO REAL 049-223-030 MONTEREY ROAD
049-201 -036 ELCAMINO REAL 049-223-033 MONTEREYROAD
049-202-003 MONTEREYROAD 049-223-034 MONTEREYROAD
049-202-004 CAMPO 049-231 -001 SANGREGORO
049-202-008 MONTEREY ROAD 049-231 -002 SAN GREGORIO
049-202-009 CAMPO 049-231 -003 SANGREOORIO
049-202-009 MONTEREYROAD 049-231 -005 SANGREGORIO
049-202-015 MONTEREY ROAD 049-231 -011 SAN GREGORIO
049-202-017 MONTEREY ROAD 049-231 -012 SAN GREGORIO
049-20-9-018 MONTEREY ROAD 049-231 -014 SANGREGORIO
049-202-019 MONTEREY ROAD 049-231 -015 SAN GREGORK)
049-202-020 MONTEREYROAD 049-232-002 SANGREGORIO
049-202-021 MONTEREYROAD 049-232-029 SANGREC3ORIO
049-202-022 CAMPO 049-232-031 SANGREGORIO
049-202-023 CAMPO 049-232-032 DEL RIO ROAD
049-202-024 CAMPO 049-232-033 SANGREGORIO
049-202-033 CAMPO 049-241 -008 MONTEREYROAD
049-202-034 CAMPO 049-241 -018 DEL RIO ROAD
049-202-035 CAMPO 049-241 -020 DEL RIO ROAD
049-211 -011 RAMONA 049-241 -022 DEL RIO ROAD
049-211 -019 El CAMINO REAL 049-241 -023 ALTURAS
049-211 -031 RAM" 049-241 -025 DEL RIO ROAD
049-211 -032 RAMONA 049-241 -033 ALTURAS
049-211443 El CAMINO REAL 049-241 -036 DEL RIO ROAD
049-211 -049 ELCAMINO REAL 049-241 -045 ALTURAS
049-211 -050 RAMONA 049-251 -017 ARDILLA ROAD .
049-211 -051 RAMONA 049-251 -018 ARDILLA ROAD
049-211 -052 EL CAMINO REAL 049-251 -019 ARDILLA ROAD
049-211 -053 EL CAMINO REAL 049-251 -020 MONTEREY ROAD
049-212-005 RAMONA 049-251 -022 MONTEREYROAD
049-212-012 RAMONA 049-251 -023 MONTEREY ROAD
049-212-013 RAMONA 049-251 -033 MCNTEREYROAD
049-212-016 RAMONA 049-251 -034 MONt'EREY ROAD
049-212-017 RAMONA 049-251 -035 MONTEREYROAD
049-212-019 RAIMONA 049-251 -036 MONTEREY ROAD
049-212-020 RAMONA 049-251 -037 MONTEREY ROAD
049-212-021 RAM" 049-251 -038 MONTEREYROAD
049-221 -034 EL CAMINO REAL 049-251 -039 ARDILLA ROAD
049-221 -044 MONTEREY ROAD 049-252-002 ARDILLA ROAD
049-221 -048 MCNTEREYROAD 049-252-005 ARDILLA ROAD
049-221 -049 MONTEREY ROAD 049-252-007 ARDILLA ROAD
049-221 -052 MONTEREYROAD 049-252-008 ARDILLA ROAD
049-221 -056 MONTEREYROAD 049-262-001 MONTEREYROAD
049-221 -057 MCNTEREYROAD 049-262-002 MONTEREYROAD
049-221 -058 MONTEREY ROAD 049-262-003 MONTEREY ROAD
049-221 -059 MONTEREYROAD 049-262-007 MCNTEREYROAD
049-221 -062 ELCAMINO REAL 049-262-027 MONTEREYROAD
049-221 -063 ELCAMINO REAL 049-262-031 MONTEREYROAD
049-222-038 ELCAMINO REAL 049-262-032 MONTEREY ROAD
049-222-041 EL CAMINO REAL 049-262-035 MONTEREY ROAD
049-223-003 MONTEREY ROAD 049-262-036 MCNTEREY ROAD
049-223-005 MONTEREYROAD 049-271 -001 ALTURAS
049-223-008 MONTEREYROAD 049-271 -002 ALTURAS
WEED ABATEMENT EXHIBIT A-ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER/STREET 27
049-271 -003 ALTURAS 049-321 -011 SANTA CRUZ ROAD
/
049-271 -010 ALTURAS 049-321 -014 SANTA CRUZ ROAD
04 9-271 -020 SAN FERNANDO 049-321 -018 SANTA CRUZ ROAD
049-271 -021 SAN FERNANDO 049-321 -019 SANTA CRUZ ROAD
049-271 -022 SANFERNANDO 049-322-001 PASEOPACIFICO
049-281 -001 SAN FERNANDO 049-322-00 2 PASEO PACIRCO
049-281 -002 SAN FERNANDO 049-322-0 0 3 PASEO PACIRCO
049-281 -003 SAN FERNANDO 049-322-004 PASEO PACIFICO
049-281 -004 SAN FERNANDO 049-322-005 PASEO PACIFICO
049-281 -010 SAN FERNANDO 049-322-006 PASEO PACIFICO
049-301 -001 SANANSELMO 049-322-007 PASEO PACIFICO,
049-301 -002 SANANSELMO 049-322-008 PASEO PACIFICO
049-301 -003 SANANSELMO 049-322-009 PASEOPACIFICO
049-301 -004 SANANSELMO 049-331 -002 ARDILLA
049-301 -008 FALDA 049-331 -004 ARDILLA
049-301 -010 AMARGON 049-331 -006 ARDILLA
049-301 -013 AMARGON 049-331 -009 BALBOA
049-301 -015 FALDA 049-331 -015 GRAVES CRKRD
049-301 -018 AMARGON 049-331 -01 6 GRAVES CRKRD
049-301 -019 AMARGON 049-331 -017 GRAVES CRK RD
049-301 -020 FALDA 049-331 -018 GRAVES CRKRD
049-302.001 SANANSELMO 049-331 -019 BALBOA
049-302-002 SANANSELMO 049-331 -020 BALBOA
049-302-004 COLIMA 049-331 -022 ARDILLA
049-302-005 COLIMA 049-331 -023 ARDILLA
049-302-010 FALDA 049-331 -024 ARDILLA
049-302-014 COLIMA 049-331 -025 ARDILLA
049-302-015 FALDA 049-331 -026 BALBOA
049-302-017 COLIMA
049-302-018 COLIMA
049-302-021 FALDA
049-302-024 COLIMA
049-302-025 COLIMA
049-302-027 FALDA
049-302-028 FALDA
049-302-029 FALDA
049-302-030 COLIMA
049-302-031 COLIMA
049-302-032 SAN BENITO
049-302-033 COLIMA
049-302-034 FALDA
049-302-036 COLIMA
049-302-037 COLIMA
049-311 -001 EL CAMINO REAL
049-311 -002 EL CAMINO REAL
049-311 -003 EL CAMINO REAL
049-311 -004 EL CAMINO REAL
049-311 -005 ELCAMINO REAL
049-311 -008 ELCAMINO REAL
049-311 -010 EL CAMINO REAL
049-311 -011 EL CAMINO REAL
049-311 -012 EL CAMINO REAL
1349-311 -013 EL CAMINO REAL
'49
-321 -009 SANTA CRUZ ROAD
WEED ABATEMENT EXHIBIT A- ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER/STREET 28
050-011 -001 SANTA CRUZ 050-042-006 SAN FERNANDO
050-011 -002 SANTA CRUZ 050-042-007 BALBOA
050-0-11 -004 SANTACRUZ 050-042-008 BALBOA
050-011 -006 SANTACRUZ 050-042-009 BALBOA
050-011 -007 SANTACRUZ 050-042-010 BALBOA
050-011 -008 SANTACRUZ 050-042-011 ALTURAS
050-012-001 SANTACRUZ 050-042-012 ALTURAS
050-012-013 SANGREGORIO 050-043-002 BALBOA
050-012-014 SANGREGORIO 050-043-005 BALBOA
050-012-018 SANGREGORIO 050-043-006 BALBOA
050-012-019 SANGREGORIO 050-051 -005 BALBOA
050-012-020 SANGREGORIO 050-051 -006 BALBOA
050-012-024 SAN GREGORIO 050-051 -014 BALBOA
050-012-025 SAN GREQORIO 050-051 -015 BALBOA
050-02-027 SANTACRUZ 050-051 -016 BALBOA
050-012-028 SANTACRUZ 050-051 -017 BALBOA
0 50-01 2-029 SANTACRUZ 050-051 -018 BALBOA
050-012-032 SANTACRUZ 050-051 -019 BALBOA
050-021 -002 SANGREGORIO 050-051 -020 SAN FERNANDO
050-021 -004 DEL RIO 050-051 -021 SANFERNANDO
050-021 -013 SANGREGORIO 050-051 -023 SAN FF-RNANDO
050-021 -014 SAN GREGORIO 050-051 -024 SAN FERNANDO
050-021 -017 SANGREGOFJO 050-051 -025 BALBOA
050-021 -019 SANGREGaPoO 050-051 -026 BALBOA
050-021 -020 SANGREGORIO 050-051 -027 BALBOA
050-021 -021 SANGFEG0RIO 050-051 -028 BALBOA
050-021 -022 SANGREGORIO 050-051 -029 BALBOA
050-021 -023 SANGREGORIO 050-051 -030 BALBOA
050-021 -024 SANGREGORIO 050-061 -003 BALBOA
050-021 -025 SANGREGORIO 050-061 -009 BALBOA
050-021 -026 DEL RIO 050-061 -011 BALBOA
050-021 -027 SANGREGORIO 050-061 -012 ARDILLA
050-021 -028 DELRIO 050-061 -013 ARDILLA
050-021 -029 DEL RIO 050-061 -014 ARDILLA
050-021 -030 SANGREGORIO 050-061 -015 BALBOA
050-021 -031 DELRIO 050-061 -016 BALBOA
050-021 -032 DELRIO 050-063-001 BALBOA
050-031 -010 DELRIO 050-071 -008 ARDILLA
050-031 -016 DEL RIO 050-071 -009 ARDILLA
050-031 -019 DELRIO 050-071 -01 2 BALBOA
050-031 -020 DELRIO 050-071 -013 GRAVESCREEK
050-031 -026 ALTURAS 050-071 -024 GRAVESCREEK
050-031 -027 ALTURAS 050-071 -025 GRAVESCREEK
050-031 -028 DEL RIO 050-071 -032 ARDILLA
050-031 -038 ALTURAS 050-071 -033 GRAVESCREEK
050-031 -039 ALTURAS 050-071 -034 GRAVESCREEK
050-041 -006 BALBOA 050-071 -035 GRAVESCREEK
050-041 -00 9 BALBOA 050-071 -036 GRAVES CREEK
050-041 -010 BALBOA 050-081 -001 SANTA CRUZ
050-041 -011 BALBOA 050-081 -010 SANTACRUZ
050-042-001 ALTURAS 050-081 -011 SANTA CRUZ
050-042-002 ALTURAS 050-091 -007 SAN GFEMM
050-042-003 ALTURAS 050-091 -012 SANGREGORIO
050-042-005 SAN FERNANDO 050-091 -015 SAN GREGORIO
WEED ABATEMENT EXHIBIT A- ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER/STREET 29
050-091 -019 SANTA CRUZ 050-131 -009 SAN FERNANDO
050-091 -020 SANTACRUZ 050-131 -014 BALBOA
050-092-003 SANGFEGORJO 050-131 -015 BALBOA
050-092-007 DELRIO 050-131 -016 SANFERNANDO
050-092-008 DELRIO 050-131 -018 SANFERNANDO
050-092-009 DELRIO 050-131 -020 SANFERNANDO
050-092-010 DELRIO 050-131 -022 SANFERNANDO
050-101 -001 DELRIO 050-131 -023 SANFERNANDO
050-101 -009 SANTAANA 050-131 -024 SANFERNANDO
050-101 -011 DELRIO 050-131 -025 SANFERNANDO
050-101 -015 DELRIO 050-131 -026 BALBOA
050-101 -017 SANGREGORIO 050-131 -027 BALBOA
050-101 -018 SANTAANA 050-131 -029 SAN FERNANDO
050-101 -019 SANTAANA 050-131 -030 SAN FERNANDO
050-111 -003 ALTURAS 050-131 -128 BALBOA
050-111 -004 ALTURAS 050-141 -004 BALBOA
050-111 -004 ALTURAS 050-141 -008 BALBOA
050-111 -008 BALBOA 050-141 -009 BALBOA
050-111 -010 ALTURAS 050-141 -013 SAN FERNANDO
050-111 -011 ALTURAS 050-141 -016 SAN FERNANDO
050-111 -012 DEL RIO 050-141 -021 SAN FERNANDO
050-111 -013 ALTURAS 050-141 -022 SANFERNANDO
050-111 -013 ALTURAS 050-141 -023 SAN FERNANDO
050-111 -014 BALBOA 050-141 -024 BALBOA
050-111 -015 BALBOA 050-141 -025 BALBOA
050-111 -016 BALBOA 050-141 -026 BALBOA
050-111 -017 BALBOA 050-141 -027 BALBOA
050-111 -019 DEL RIO 050-141 -033 SAN FERVANDO
050-111 -020 DELRIO 050-141 -034 SANFERNANDO
050-121 -002 SANfAANA 050-151 -008 SAN FERNANDO
050-121 -006 SANTAANA 050-151 -009 SAN FERNANDO
050-121 -007 SANTA ANA 050-151 -011 SAN FERNANDO
050-121 -008 SANTAANA 050-151 -012 SAN FERNANDO
050-121 -010 ALTURAS 050-151 -018 SAN FERNANDO
050-121 -013 ALIURAS 050-151 -019 SAN FERVANDO
050-121 -014 SANTA ANA 050-152-012 GRAVES CREEl<
050-121 -020 SAN FERNANDO 050-152-013 GRAVES CREEK
050-121 -021 SAN FERNANDO 050-152-015 SAN FERNANDO
050-121 -023 CORRIEN TE 050-152-017 GRAVES CREEK
050-121 -024 CORREM'E 050-153-004 GRAVESCREEK
050-121 -029 CORRE TE 050-153-008 GRAVESCREEK
050-121 -030 CORRIENTE 050-153-009 GRAVES CREEK
050-121 -032 SANTAANA 050-153-011 GRAVESCREEK
050-121 -033 SANTAANA 050-153-012 GRAVESCREEK
0 50-121 -034 SANTAANA 050-161 -010 SANTA CRUZ
050-122-004 BALBOA 050-161 -010 SANTACRUZ
050-122-005 SANTAANA 050-162-002 SANTACRUZ
050-122-014 SANTAANA 050-162-005 SANTA CRUZ
050-122-016 SANTAANA 050-162-012 SANTACRLIZ
050-122-018 BALBOA 050-162-013 SANTACRUZ
050-122-019 BALBOA 050-162-017 SANTACRUZ
OEO-131 -002 BALBOA 050-171 -006 BALBOA
0-'-.)-131 -004 BALBOA 050-173-004 CCRCNA
050-131 -005 BALBOA 050-173-006 SANTAANA
WEED ABATEMENT EXHIBIT A- ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER/STREET 30
050-173-012 SANTAANA 050-242-003 LLANO
050-173-013 SAWA" 050-242-005 LLANO
050-173-019 SANTAANA 050-242-007 OTERO
050-173-024 OCFOA 050-242-013 LLANO
050-192-008 SANTAANA 050-242-014 UANO
050-201 -005 JAQUIMA 050-261 -001 SANTAANA
050-202-011 OTERO 050-262-001 SANTAANA
050-202-012 CTBT 050-262-003 SANTA ARA
050-202-014 OTERO 050-262-009 LLANO
050-203.001 OTERO 050-262-011 SANTAANA
050-211 -001 SANTAANA 050-262-012 SANTAANA
050-211 -002 SANTAANA 050-262-013 SANTAANA
050-211 -003 SANTAANA 050-262-016 SANTAANA
050-212-003 SANTAANA 050-262-017 SANTAANA
050-212-007 SANTAANA 050-271 -008 SANTA ANA
050-212-008 SANTAANA 050-271 -009 SANTAANA
050-212-013 CORRIENTE 050-271 -010 SANTA ANA
050-212-018 SANTAANA 050-271 -014 CEBADA
050-213-002 ENCHANTO 050-271 -015 SANTAANA
050-221 -005 CORRIENTE 050-271 -019 CEBADA
050-221 -012 SAN FERNANDO 050-271 -020 SANTA ANA
050-221 -013 CORRIENTE 050-271 -021 CEBADA
050-221 -017 SAN FERNANDO 050-271 -022 SANTA ANA
050-221 -018 SANFERNANDO 050-271 -023 CEBADA
050-221 -019 SAN FERNANDO 050-271 -025 SANTA ANA
050-221 -022 SANTAANA 050-271 -026 CEBADA
050-221 -023 SANTAANA 050-281 -002 SANTAANA
050-221 -025 SANFERNANDO 050-281 -004 SANTAANA
050-221 -028 CEBADA 050-281 -005 SANTAANA
050-221 -029 CEBADA 050-281 -009 SANTAANA
050-221 -030 CEBADA 050-281 -010 SANTAANA
050-221 -031 CEBADA 050-301 -002 SANTA LUCIA
050-221 -033 CEBADA 050-301 -003 SANTA LUCIA
050-221 -034 CEBADA 050-302-001 SANTA LUCIA
050-221 -036 CEBADA 050-302-002 SANTA LUCIA
050-221 -038 CORRIENTE 050-302-004 SANTA LUCIA
050-221 -039 CORRIENTE 050-302-005 SANTA LUCIA
050-221 -040 SANTAANA 050-302-006 SANTA LUCIA
050-231 -003 SAN FERNANDO
050-302-008 SANTA LUCIA
050-231 -004 SANFERNANDO 050-302-009 SANTA LUCIA
050-231 -005 SEW FERNANDO 050-311 -005 SANTA LUCIA
050-231 -006 SAN FERNANDO 050-311 -006 SANTA LUCIA
050-231 -010 SAN FERNANDO 050-311 -007 SANTA LUCIA
050-231 -019 SAN FERNANDO 050-311 -008 SANTA LUCIA
050-231 -020 SAN FERNANDO 050-312-009 SANTA LUCIA
050-231 -022 SAN FERNANDO 050-312-011 SANTA LUCIA
050-231 -023 CEBADA 050-312-012 SANTA LUCIA
050-231 -024 CEBADA 050-312-013 ELME
050-231 -025 CEBADA 050-312-014 ELMONTE
050-231 -026 CEBADA 050-312-015 ELMONTE
050-231 -030 CEBADA 050-312-017 SANTA LUCIA
050-231 -031 CEBADA 050-312-018 SANTA LUCIA
050-231 -033 SAN FERNANDO 050-312-019 SANTA 050-312-020 Et MONT1=LUCIA �-
050-242-002 LLANO
WEED ABATEMENT EXHIBIT A- ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER/STREET 3 ;
050-321 -003 SANTA LUCIA 050-351 -010 LLANO
050-321 -004 SANTA LUCIA 050-351 -011 LLANO
050-321 -005 SANTA LUCIA 050-351 -011 LLANO
050-321 -006 SANTA LUCIA 050-361 -003 ELMONTE
050-321 -008 SANTA LUCIA 050-361 -004 ELMONTE
050-321 -012 SANTA LUCIA 050-361 -005 ELMONTE
050-323-005 SANTA LUCIA 050-361 -005 ELMONTE
050-323-006 SANTALLICLA 050-361 -006 ELMONTE
050-323-007 SANTA LLICIA 050-361 -007 ELMON'TE
050-323-014 BOLSA 050-361 -008 SANLUCAS
050-323-016 BOLSA 050-361 -009 ELMONTE
050-323-018 BOLSA 050-362-002 ELMONTE
050-323-019 BOLSA 050-362-003 ELMONTE
050-323-020 BOLSA 050-362-004 ELMONTE
050-323-025 SANTA LUCIA 050-362-005 ELMONTE
050-323-026 SANTA LLICIA 050-362-006 SAN LUCAS
050-324-001 SANTA LUCIA 050-362-009 ELMONTE
050-324-003 SANTALLICIA 050-362-010 SAN LUCAS
050-324-004 SANTA LUCIA 050-362-011 SANL.UCAS
050-324-007 SANTA LLICIA
050-324-013 SANTALLICLA
050-324-014 SANTA LLICIA
050-324-015 SANTA LUCIA
050-324-016 SANTA LUCIA
050-324-017 SANTA LUCIA
050-331 -003 LLANO
050-331 -010 LLANO
050-331 -011 LLANO
050-331 -013 LLANO
050-331 -013 LOMITAS
050-331 -014 LLANO
050-331 -016 LLANO
050-331 -016 LOMITAS
050-341 -003 LOMITAS
050-341 -004 LOMITAS
050-341 -006 LOMITAS
050-341 -010 SANTA LUCIA
050-341 -013 SANTA LUCIA
050-341 -014 SANTA LUCIA
050-341 -016 LOMITAS
050-341 -017 SANTA LUCIA
050-341 -018 SANTA LUCLA
050-341 -020 LOMITAS
050-341 -022 LOMITAS
050-341 -023 LOMITAS
050-341 -025 LOMITAS
050-341 -026 SANTA LUCIA
050-341 -027 SANTA LLICIA
050-351 -006 LLANO
050-351 -006 LLANO
050-351 -007 LLANO
050-351 -009 LLANO
050-351 -009 LLANO
050-351 -010 LLANO
WEED ABATEMENT EXHIBIT A-ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER/STREET 32
054-005-044 ARDILLA 054-022-018 PORTOLA
054-005-046 ARDILLA 054-022-030 SANTA LUCIA
054-005-047 ARDILLA 054-022-031 SANTA LUCIA
054-005-057 ARDILLA 054-032-010 SAN BENITO
054-005-069 ARDILLA 054-032-011 SAN BENITO
054-006-008 SANTA LUCIA 054-032-012 SAN BENITO
054-006-028 SANTA LUCIA 054-032-013 SAN BENITO
054-006-041 SANTA LUCIA 054-032-017 MARICOPA
054-006-042 SANTA LUCIA 054-032-030 MONTEREY
054-006-044 SANTA LUCIA 054-032-036 SAN BENITO
054-006-045 SANTA LUCIA 054-032-039 SAN BENITO
054-006-058 SANTA LUCIA 054-032-040 SAN BENITO
054-006-059 SANTA LUCIA 054-032-041 MARICOPA
054-006-060 SANTA LUCIA 054-041 -005 MARICOPA
054-006-061 SANTA LUCIA 054-041 -006 MARICOPA
054-006-062 SANTA LUCIA 054-041 -008 MARICOPA
054-006-063 SANTA LUCIA 054-041 -010 MARICOPA
054-006-064 SANTA LUCIA 054-041 -017 SAN BENITO
054-006-065 SANTA LUCIA 054-041 -018 SAN BENITO
054-006-066 SANTA LUCIA 054-041 -033 SAN BENITO
054-011 -017 SAN JACINTO AVE 054-043-001 SAN BENITO
054-011 -018 SAN ANSELMO RD 054-043-002 SAN BENITO
054-011 -023 SAN ANSELMO RD 054-043-012 ARDILLA
054-011 -024 SAN ANSELMO RD 054-043-015 ARDILLA
054-012-010 ARDILLA 054-043-016 ARDILLA
054-012-016 ARDILLA 054-043-021 ARDILLA
054-012-017 ARDILLA 054-050-044 ARDILLA RD
054-012-023 ARDILLA 054-050-046 ARDILLA RD
054-012-026 ARDILLA 054-050-047 ARDILLA RD
054-012-027 ARDILLA 054-050-057 ARDILLA RD
054-012-035 VBVADO 054-050-069 PORTOLA RD
054-012-036 Veom 054-061 -008 SANTALUCLA
054-013-001 SANANSELMO 054-061 -028 SANTA LUCIA
054-013-002 MARICOPA 054-061 -041 SANTA LUCIA
054-013-004 MARICOPA 054-061 -042 SANTA LUCIA
054-013-013 ARDILLA 054-061 -044 PORTOLA RD
054-013-018 SANANSELMO 054-061 -045 PORTOLA RD
054-013-019 SAN ANSELMO 054-061 -058 SANTA LUCIA
054-013-020 MARICOPA 054-061 -059 SANTA LUCIA
054-013-025 ARDILLA 054-061 -060 SANTA LUCIA
054-01'3-027 ARDILLA 054-061 -061 SANTA LUCIA
054-014-004 SAN ANSELMO 054-061 -062 SANTA LUCIA
0 54-014-005 MARICOPA 054-061 -063 SANTA LUCIA
054-014-006 MARICOPA 054-061 -064 SANTA LUCIA
054-014-007 SAN ANSELMO 054-061 -065 SANTA LUCIA
054-014-019 MARICOPA 054-061 -066 SANTA LUCIA
054-021 -001 CHAUPLIN 054-071 -001 PORTOLA
054-021 -007 ATAJO 054-071 -007 PORTOLA
054-021 -011 ATAJO 054-071 -008 PORTOLA
054-021 -018 CHAUPLIN 054-071 -012 PORTOLA
054-021 -019 CHAUPLIN 054-071 -013 PORrOtA
054-021 -020 ATAJO 054-071 -032 PORTOLA i
054-022-009 PORTOLA 054-072-002 PORTOLA
054-022-017 PORTCLA 054-072-005 PORTOLA
WEED ABATEMENT EXHIBIT A-ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER/STREET 33
054-072-016 SANTA LUCIA 054-085-049 PORTOLA
054-072-021 LOSGATOS 054-085-050 PORTOLA
054-072-021 LOSGATOS 054-085-051 PORTOLA
054-072-023 PORTOLA 054-086-003 BELLA VISTA RD
054-072-028 LOSGATOS 054-086-004 BELLA VISTA RD
054-072-032 SANTA LUCIA 054-086-006 BELLA VISTA RD
054-072-036 PORTOLA 054-086-010 BELLA VISTA RD
054-072-048 PORTOLA 054-086-012 BELLA VISTA RD
054-072-057 LOSGATOS 054-086-013 BELLA VISTA RD
054-072-058 LOSGATOS 054-086-014 BELLA VISTA RD
054-072-060 PORTOLA 054-086-015 BELLA VISTA RD
054-072-061 PORTOLA 054-086-016 BELLA VISTA RD
054-072-062 FLORES 054-086-018 BELLA VISTA RD
054-072-066 PORTOLA 054-091 -013 CASCABELROAD
054-072-069 SANTA LUCIA 054-091 -014 CASCABEL ROAD
054-072-070 SANTA LUCIA 054-091 -017 CASCABELROAD
054-072-071 SANTA LUCIA 054-091 -022 CASCABELROAD
054-072-076 FLORES 054-091 -024 CASCABELROAD
054-072-077 FLORES 054-091 -025 CASCABELROAD
054-072-078 PORTOLA RD 054-092-001 CASCABELROAD
054-072-079 SANTA LUCIA 054-092-002 CASCABELROAD
054-073-018 PORTOLA 054-092-014 CASCABELROAD
054-073-020 PORTOLA 054-092-015 CASCABELROAD
054-073-021 PORTOLA 054-101 -006 CASCABEL ROAD
054-073-026 PORTOLA 054-101 -012 CASCABELROAD
054-073-028 SANTA LUCIA 054-101 -016 CASCABEL ROAD
054-081 -014 PORTOLA ROAD 054-101 -017 CASCABEL ROAD
054-081 -027 PORTOLA ROAD 054-101 -018 CASCABELROAD
054-081 -030 PORTOLA ROAD 054-102-011 CASCABEL ROAD
054-081 -042 PORTOLA ROAD 054-102-013 CASCrABEL ROAD
054-082-006 SANMARCOS 054-102-021 CASCABELROAD
054-082-012 SAN MARCOS 054-111 -003 SANTA LUCIA
054-082-013 SAN MARCOS 054-111 -005 SANTA LUCIA
054-084-004 SAN MARCOS 054-111 -024 SANTA LUCIA
054-084-005 SAN MARCOS 054-111 -027 SANTA LUCIA
054-084-006 SAN MARCOS 054-111 -035 SANTA LUCIA
054-085-002 BELLA VISTA RD 054-111 -039 SANTA LUCIA
054-085-007 BELLA VISTA RD 054-111 -040 SANTA LUCIA
054-085-011 PORTOLA 054-111 -041 SANTA LUCIA
054-085-014 PORTaA 054-111 -042 SANTA LUCIA
054-085-016 PORTCLA 054-111 -043 SANTA LUCIA
054-085-024 PORTOLA 054-111 -044 SANTA LUCIA
054-085-025 BELLA VISTA RD 054-111 -046 SANTA LUCIA
054-085-028 BELLA VISTA RD 054-121 -002 LOSGATOSRD
054-085-029 BELLA VISTA RD 054-121 -003 LOSGATCSRD
054-085-032 BELLA VISTA RD 054-121 -012 LOSGATOSRD
054-085-038 BELLA VISTA RD 054-121 -019 LOSGATOSRD
054-085-039 BELLA VISTA RD 054-121 -021 LOSGATOSRD
054-085-040 PORTOLA 054-121 -022 LOSGATOSRD
054-085-044 PORT= 054-121 -02T LOS GATOSRD
054-085-045 BELLA VISTA RD 054-121 -035 LOSGATOSRD
054-085-046 PORTCLA 054-121 -036 SAN MARCOSRD
054-085-047 BELLA VISTA RD 054-121 -037 SAN MARCS RD
054-085-048 PORTCLA 054-121 -038 SAN MARCOSRD
WEED ABATEMENT EXHIBIT A-ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER/STREET 34
054-122-019 SANTA LUCIA RD 054-142-028 SAN GABRIEL RD
054-122-024 LOS GATOSRD 054-142-031 SAN GABRIEL RD
054-122-029 LOS GATOSRD 054-142-032 SAN GABRIEL RD
054-122-030 FLORES 054-142-033 SAN GARBIELRD
054-122-031 LOSGATOSRD 054-142-034 SAN GABRIEL RD
054-131 -003 SAN GABRIEL 054-143-008 CARMELITA RD
054-131 -004 SAN GABRIEL 054-151 -013 SAN GABRIEL RD
054-131 -011 SAN MARCOS RD 054-151 -018 SANTA ROSH RD
0 5 4-131 -01 2 SAN MARCOS RD 054-151 -019 SANTA ROSH RD
054-131 -015 SAN MARCOS RD 054-151 -021 MORRO ROAD
054-131 -016 SAN GABRIEL 054-151 -025 MORRO ROAD
054-132-011 SAN GABRIEL 054-151 -026 MORRO ROAD
054-132-025 SAN MARCOS RD 0 54-1 51 -028 SANTA ROSARD
054-132-027 SAN MARCOS RD 054-151 .028 SANTA ROSARD
054-132-028 SAN MARCOS RD 054-151 -029 SANTA ROSARD
0 54-1 32-033 SAN MARCOS RD 054-151 -031 MORRO ROAD
054-132-037 SAN MARCOS RD 054-151 -034 SAN GABRIEL RD
054-132-038 SAN MARCOS RD 054-151 -035 SAN GABRIEL RD
054-132-039 SAN MARCOS RD 054-151 -036 SAN GABRIEL RD
054-132-041 SAN MARCOS RD 0 54-151 -039 SAN GABRIEL RD
054-132-043 SAN MARCOS RD 054-151 -042 SANTA ROSARD
054-132-044 SAN MARCOS RD 054-151 -043 SANTA ROSARD
054-132-045 SAN MARCOS RD 054-151 .044 SAN GABRIEL RD
054-132-048 SAN MARCOS RD 054-151 -045 SAN GABRIEL RD
054-132-051 SAN MARCOS RD 054-151 -046 SAN GABRIEL RD
054-132-052 SAN MARCOS RD 054-151 -047 SANTA ROSARD
054-132-054 SAN MARCOS RD 054-151 -048 SANTA ROSARD
054-132-062 SAN MARCOS RD 054-161 -006 SAN BENITO ROAD
054-132-063 SAN MARCOS RD 054-161 -007 SANTA ANA ROAD
0 54-13 2 064 SAN MARCOS RD 054-161 -008 SAN BENITO ROAD
054-132-065 SAN MARCOS RD 054-1 61 -009 SAN BENITO ROAD
054-132-065 SAN MARCOS RD 054-162-002 SANTA ANA ROAD
054-132-066 BELLA VISTA 054-162-004 SANTA ANA ROAD
054-132-068 SAN MARCOS RD O54-162-005 SANTAANAROAD
054-132-070 SAN MARCOS RD 054-162-006 SANTA ANA ROAD
054-132-071 SAN MARCOS RD 054-162-007 SANTAANAROAD
054-132-073 SAN MARCOS RD 054-162-008 SANTAANAROAD
054-141 -003 SAN MARCOS RD 054-171 -009 SANTA LUCIA RD
054-141 -005 SAN MARCOS RD 054-171 -012 SANTA LUCIA RD
054-141 -006 SAN MARCOS RD 054-171 -018 SANTA LUCIA RD
054-142-003 SAN GABRIEL RD 054-171 -019 SANTA LUCIA RD
054-142-004 SAN GABRIEL RD 054-171 -0 2 0 SANTA LUCIA RD
054-142-006 SAN GABRIEL RD 0 5 4-171 -0 21 SANTA ANA ROAD
054-142-008 SAN GABRIEL RD 054_1
5 4.171 -022 SANTAANAROAD
054-142-013 SAN GABRIEL RD 054-171 -023 SANTAANAROAD
054-142-015 SAN GABRIEL RD 054_171 -024 SANTA ANA ROAD
054-142-016 SAN GABRIEL RD 054.171 -025 SANTAANAROAD
054-142-017 SAN GABRIEL RD 054-171 -0 2 6 SANTA ANA ROAD
054-142-018 SAN GABRIEL RD 0 5 4-171 -0 2 7 SANTA ANA ROAD
054-142-021 SAN GABRIEL RD 054-181 -003 SANTA LUCIA RD
054-142-023 SAN GABRIEL RD 054-181 -014 SANTA LUCIA RD
054-142-024 SAN GABRIEL RD 054_181 -021 SANTA LUCIA RD
054-142-026 SAN GABRIEL RD 054-181 -022 SANTA LUCIA RD
054-142-027 SAN GABRIEL RD 054-181 -028 SANTA LUCIA RD
WEED ABATEMENT EXHIBIT A-ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER/STREET
054-191 -015 PORTALROAD 054-231 -028 LOSOSOS
•( 054-201 -006 SAN GABRIEL RD 054-231 -029 LOSOSOS
054-201 -012 SAN MARCOSRD 054-231 -031 LOSOSOS
054-201 -013 SAN GABRIEL 054-231 -035 SAN RAFAEL RD
054-201 -014 SAN GABRIEL 054-231 -038 SAN RAFAEL RD
054-201 -024 SAN MARCOSRD 054-231 -039 SAN RAFAEL RD
054-201 -025 SAN GABRIEL RD 054-231 -040 (OLD)MORRO RD
054-201 -026 SAN GABRIEL RD 054-231 -041 (OLD)MORRO RD
054-201 -027 SAN GABRIEL RD 054-231 -044 (OLD)MORRO RD
054-201 -032 SAN MARC OS RD 054-241 -002 SAN GABRIEL RD
054-201 -034 SAN MARC OS RD 054-241 -018 SAN GABRIEL RD
054-201 -036 SAN MARCOSRD 054-241 -021 SAN GABRIEL RD
054-201 -037 ENDO 054-241 -022 SAN GABRIEL RD
054-201 -042 SAN MARCOS RD 054-241 -025 SAN GABRIEL RD
054-201 -043 SAN MARCOSRD 054-241 -030 SAN RAFAEL RD
054-201 -044 SAN MARCOSRD 054-241 -032 SAN RAFAEL RD
054-201 -045 SAN MARC OS RD 054-241 -034 SAN RAFAEL RD
054-201 -046 SAN MARCOSRD 054-241 -035 SAN RAFAEL RD
054-201 -047 SAN MARCOSRD 054-241 -036 SAN RAFAEL RD
054-201 -048 SAN MARCOSRD 054-241 -037 SAN GABRIEL RD
054-201 -049 SAN GABRIEL RD 054-241 -038 SAN RAFAEL RD
054-201 -050 SAN GABRIEL RD 054-241 -039 SAN RAFAEL RD
054-201 -051 SAN GABRIEL RD 054-241 -040 SAN RAFAEL RD
054-201 -052 ESCC NDIDO 054-251 -002 TEOOL07E
054-201 -053 ESCCrDIDO 054-251 -003 TEOOLOTE
054-211 -005 SAN GABRIEL 054-251 -004 TECOLOTE
054-211 -008 SAN GABRIEL 054-251 -005 TECCLOTE
054-212-001 SAN GABRIEL 054-261 -001 SANTA LUCIA
054-212-013 SAN GABRIEL 054-261 -003 SANTA LUCIA
054-212-018 SAN GABRIEL 054-261 -004 SANTA LUCIA
054-212-019 SAN GABRIEL 054-261 -009 SANTA LUCIA
054-212-020 SAN GABRIEL 054-261 -010 SANTA LUCIA
054-212-023 SAN GABRIEL 054-261 -013 SANTA LUCIA
054-212-024 SAN GABRIEL 054-262-004 SANTA LUCIA
054-212-025 CARMELITA 054-262-005 SANTA LUCIA
054-212-026 CARMELITA 054-262-006 SANTA LUCIA
054-212-027 SAN GABRIEL 054-271 -003 SANTA LUCIA
054-212-032 CARMELITA 054-271 -004 SANTA LUCIA
054-212-033 CARMELITA 054-271 -006 SANTA LUCIA
054-212-035 CARMELITA 054-271 -007 SANTA LUCIA
054-221 -003 CARMELITA 054-271 -008 SANTA LUCIA
054-221 -004 CARMELITA 054-272-006 LLANO
054-221 -005 CARMELITA 054-272-015 LLANO
054-221 -008 CARMELITA 054-272-020 LLANO
054-221 -011 CARMELITA 054-272-021 LLANO
054-231 -007 (OLD)MORRO RD 054-272-024 UAW
054-231 -009 (OLD)MORRO RD 054-272-027 LLANO
054-231 -018 SAN RAFAEL RD 054-272-028 LLANO
054-231 -019 SAN RAFAEL RD 054-281 -001 LAUREL
054-231 -020 (OLD)MORRO RD 054-281 -007 PORTAL ROAD
054-231 -021 (OLD)MORRO RD 054-281 -010 PORTAL ROAD
054-231 -a22 SAN RAFAEL RD 054-281 -012 PORTAL ROAD
054-231 -024 (OLD)MORRO RD 054-281 -013 LAUREL
054-231 -025 (OLD)MORRO RD 054-281 -014 LAUREL
WEED ABATEMENT EXHIBIT A-ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER/STREET 36
054-281 -015 PORTALROAD 054-321 -010 SIERRA VISTA t
054-281 -016 PORTAL ROAD 054-321 -011 ANDRITA
054-291 -012 ADO 054-322-002 MONITA
054-291 -014 LIDO 054-322-003 SIERRA VISTA
054-291 -016 PORTAL 054-322-004 SIERRA VISTA
054-291 -017 PORTAL 054-322-009 SIERRA VISTA
054-291 -018 ESCONDIDO 054-322-011 SIERRA VISTA
054-291 -019 PORTAL 054-322-033 SIERRA VISTA
054-29-1 -020 ESCONDIDO 054-331 -001 SIERRA VISTA
054-291 -021 PORTAL 054-331 -002 SIERRA VISTA
054-301 -010 ENDO 054-331 -003 SIERRA VISTA
054-301 -013 SANMARCOS 054-331 -004 SIERRA VISTA
054-301 -016 SANMARCOS 054-331 -005 SIERRA VISTA
054-30-1 -018 ESCONDIDO 054-331 -006 SIERRA VISTA
054-301 -019 ADO
054-331 -010 SIERRA VISTA
054-30-1 -020 ESOCNDIDO 054-331 -011 SIERRA VISTA
ROAD
054-301 -021 ESCONDIDO 054-332-004 SIERRA VISTA
054-301 -022 ESCONDIDO 054-333-003 SIER
054-301 -023 ESCCNDIDO 054-333-004 SIERRA VISTA
054-301 -024 ESCONDIDO 054-333-005 SIERRA VISTA
054-301 -025 SANMARCOS 054.333-007 SIERRA VISTA
054-301 -026 SANMARCOS 054-333-008 SIERRA VISTA
054-301 -027 SAN MARC OS
054-311 -003 SANMARCOS
054-311 -005 SAN MARC1OS
054-311 -008 REALITO
054-311 -016 BARRANC'O RD
054-311 -019 BARRANCO RD 0
054-311 -022 SANMARCOS
054-311 -029 SAN MAROOS
054-311 -031 SAN MARCOS
054-311 -031 SAN MARCOS
054-311 -033 SANMARC06
054-311 -035 SANMARCOS
054-311 -038 BARRANCO RD
054-311 -040 BARRANC O RD
054-311 -041 SAN MARCOS
054-311 -042 SANMAROOS
054-311 -043 SANMARCOS
054-311 -044 REAUTO
054-31"1 -045 REALTTO
054-311 -047 REALTTO
054-311 -048 SANMARCOS
054-311 -049 SANMARCOS
054-311 -050 SANMARCOS
054-311 -051 SAN MARCOS
054-311 -052 SANMARCOS
054-311 -053 SANMARCOS
054-311 -054 SAN MARCOS
054-311 -055 BARRANCO
054-311 -0 56 BARRANCO
054-311 -057 REAUTO
064-321 -008 ANDRITA
054-321 -009 SIERRA VISTA
WEED ABATEMENT EXHIBIT A-ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER/STREET 37
055-011 -006 CENEGAL 055-053-005 SANMARCOS
055-011 -007 C94EGAL 055-053-006 REALITO
055-011 -011 CENEGAL 055-054-001 REALITO
055-011 -012 CBVEGAL 055-061 -002 BARRALNCO
055-011 -013 CBNEGAL. 055-061 -003 BARRANCO
055-011 -014 SANTA LUCIA 055-062-019 LUCINDA LANE
055-011 -016 SANTA LUCIA 055-062-022 BARRANCO
055-011 -017 SANTA LUCIA 055-062-023 LUCINDA LANE
055-011 -018 SANTA LUCIA 055-062-024 LUCINDA LANE
055-011 -020 SANTA LUCIA 055-062-027 BARRANCO
055-022-008 CENEGAL 055-062-028 LUCINDA LANE
055-022-009 CENEGAL 055-062-029 LUCINDA LANE
055-022-011 SANTA LUCIA 055-062-030 LUCINDALANE
055-022-012 SANTA LUCIA 055-062-031 CARMELITA
055-022-013 SANTA LUCIA 055-062-032 BARRANCO
055-031 -010 (SAL- 055-062-033 LUCINDA LANE
055-031 -021 LAUREL 055-062-034 LUCINDA LANE
055-031 -023 LAUREL 055-062-035 BARRANCO
055-031 -024 LAUREL 055-062-037 BARRAJNCO
055-031 -025 C94EGAL 055-062-039 BARRANCO
055-031 -027 CENEGAL 055-062-040 BARRANCA
055-031 -028 CENE3AL 055-062-041 BAARANCO
055-031 -029 cee3AL 055-062-042 BARRANCD
055-031 -031 CENEGAL. 055-062-043 REALITO
055-031 -032 CENEGAL 055-062-044 REALLTO
055-031 -037 CENEGAL- 055-062-062 BARRANCO
055-031 -039 LAUREL 055-071 -001 CASANOVA
055-031 -040 LAUREL 055-071 -011 SANMARCOS
055-041 -003 SANMARCOS 055-071 -012 SANMARCOS
055-041 -006 SANMARCOS 055-071 -013 SANMARCOS
055-041 -012 SANMARCOS 055-071 -014 CASANOVA
055-041 -013 SAN MARC OS 055-071 -015 CASANOVA
055-041 -014 SAN MARC OS 055-072-002 CASANOVA
055-041 -015 LAUREL 055-072-005 CASANOVA
055-041 -016 LAUREL 055-072-006 ANDRITA
055-041 -017 LAUREL 055-073-002 ANDRITA
055-041 -018 LAUREL 055-081 -001 BARRANCO
055-051 -002 SANMARCOS 055-081 -002 BARRANOO
055-051 -008 SANMARCOS 055-081 -003 CAS440VA
055-051 -009 VISTA 055-081 -004 CASANOVA
055-051 -01 0 VISTA 055-081 -006 CASANOVA
055-051 -011 SANMARCOS 055-081 -010 CASEWOVA
055-051 -012 SAN MARC OS 055-081 -011 CASANOVA
055-052-002 REALITO 055-081 -012 CASANOVA
055-052-003 REALITO 055-082-001 CASANOVA
055-052-009 REALITO 055-082-005 CAS*MA
055-052-010 VISTA 055-082-007 ANDRITA
055-052-011 VISTA 055-082-008 CASANOVA
055-052-012 VISTA 055-083-004 CASANOVA
055-052-013 VISTA 055-083-005 CASANOVA
055-052-014 VISTA 055-091-001 SIERRA VISTA
055-053-0'01 SANMARCOS 055-091 -002 SIERRA VISTA
055-053-002 SANMARCCS 055-091 -003 SIERRA VISTA
055-053-004 REALITO 055-092-001 SIERRAVLSTA
WEED ABATEMENT EXHIBIT A-ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER/STREET 38
055-093-002 SIERRA VISTA 055-161 -019 VISTA
055-093-003 CARMELITA 055-161 -020 VISTA
055-1 01 -001 BARRANOO 055-161 -021 VISTA
055-101 -004 BARRANCO 055-161 -022 VISTA
055-101 -006 CASANOVA 055-161 -023 VISTA
055-10-1 -007 CASANOVA 055-161 -024 VISTA
055-101 -009 CASANOVA 055-161 -026 VISTA
055-101 -012 BARRANOO 055-161 -027 VISTA
055-191 -013 BARRANCO 055-161 -028 VISTA
055-101 -014 CARMELITA 055-161 -029 VISTA
055-101 -015 CASANOVA 055-161 -030 VISTA
055-101 -016 CARMEUTA 055-161 -031 VISTA
055-101 -017 CASANOVA 055-161 -032 VISTA
055-102-001 CASVCVA 055-161 -033 VISTA
055-102-002 CASANOVA 055-161 -034 VISTA
055-102-003 CAS CVA 055-161 -035 VISTA
055-102-006 SIERRA VISTA 055-161 -038 VISTA
055-102-007 CASANOVA 055-161 -039 VISTA
055-`102-010 CASANOVA 055-161 -040 VISTA
055-102-011 CASANOVA 055-171 -009 SANMARCOS
055-121 -001 CBNEGAL. 055-171 -011 SAN MARCOS
055-121 -013 COAL. 055-171 -012 SAN MARCOS
055-121 -014 CENEGAL 055-171 -013 SAN MARCOS
055-121 -015 CeIEc-AL 055-171 -014 SAN MARCOS
055-121 -017 CENEGAL 055-171 -016 SAN MARCOS
055-121 -018 CENEGAL 055-181 -008 SANMARCOS
055-121 -019 COALL, 055-181 -009 SANMARCOS
055-121 -020 C9NE3AL- 055-181 -014 SAN MARCOS
055-131 -012 CesIEGAI- 055-181 -015 SAN MARCOS
055-131 -013 CBNEGAL 055-181 -019 SAN MARCO
055-131 -014 CHNEGAL- 055-191 -003 SAN MARCOS
055-141 -005 CENEGAL 055-191 -004 SANMARCOS
055-14l -006 CENEGAL. 055-191 -005 SAN MARCOS
055-141 -007 LAUREL 055-191 -008 SANMARCOS
055-151 -005 SANMARCOS 055-191 -009 SANMARCOS
055-151 -007 SANMARCOS 055-192-002 SANMARCOS
055-151 -008 SANMARCOS 055-192-004 SANMARCOS
055-151 -009 SANMARCOS 055-192-005 SANMARCOS
055-151 -013
LAUREL 055-201 -002 SAN MARCOS
055-151 -016 LAUREL 055-201 -007 SAN MARC S
055-151 -017 LAUREL 055-201 -008
SAN MARCOSOS
055-151 -018 LAUREL 055-201 -009 SAN MARCOS
055-151 -019 LAUREL 055-201 -013 SAN MARC OS
055-151 -020 LAUREL 055-201 -014 SANMARCOS
055-151 -022 LAUREL 055-201 -015 SANMARCOS
055-161 -008 SAN MARC OS 055-201 -016 SAN MARCOS
055-161 -010 SAN MARCOS 055-201 -017' SAN MARCOS
055-161 -011 SAN MARC:OS 055-201 -018 SAN MARCOS
055-161 -012 SAN MARCO 055-201 -019 SAN MARCOS
055-161 -013 SANMARCOS 055-201 -020 SANMARCOS
055-161 -014 SANMARCOS 055-211 -014 MORRO RD
055-161 -015 SAN MARCOS 055-211 -015 MIORRO RD
0505-161 -017 VISTA 055-211 -017 SAN MARCOS
055-161 -018 VISTA 055-221 -001 MORRO RD
WEED ABATEMENT EXHIBIT A- ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER/STREET 3
055-231 -001 SANMAROOS 055-321 -012 MORRORD
055-231 -002 SANMARCOS 055-321 -017 MORRORD
055-231 -005 SANMARCOS 055-321 -018 MORRORD
055-231 -008 SANMARCOS 055-331 -001 MORRORD
055-231 -010 SANMARCOS 055-331 -002 MORRORD
055-231 -011 SANMARCOS 055-331 -003 MORRORD
055-231 -013 SAN MARCOS 055-331 -005 MORRO RD
055-231 -014 SANMARCOS 055-331 -007 MORRORD
055-231 -015 SANMARCOS 055-331 -011 MORRORD
055-231 -016 SANMARCOS 055-331 -012 MORRORD
055-231 -017 SAN NIARCOS 055-341 -001 MORRORD
055-241 -005 LOSAL70S 055-341 -002 MORRORD
055-241 -006 LOS ALTOS 055-341 -003 MORRORD
055-242-004 SANMARCOS 055-341 -005 MORRORD
055-242-0Q6 SANMARCOS 055-341 -006 MORRORD
055-242-010 MORRORD 055-361 -018 PALOVERDE
055-242-014 LOS ALTOS 055-361 -019 PALOVERDE
055-242-015 LOS ALTOS 055-421 -004 SANCAYETANO
055-242-026 LOS ALTOS 055-431 -007 SANCAYETANO
055-242-028 LOS ALTOS 055-431 -008 SANCAYEfANO
055-242-029 LOS ALTOS 055-431 -012 SANCAYETANO
055-242-030 LOS ALTOS 055-431 -013 SANCAYErANO
055-242-031 SANMARCOS 055-441 -001 LOMITAS
055-242-032 SANMARCOS 055-441 -002 LOMITAS
055-242-033 LAS ALTOS 055-442-001 LOMITAS
055-242-034 WMARCOS 055-442-002 LOMITAS
055-242-03S SANMARCOS 055-442-003 LOMITAS
• 055-242-036 MORRORD 055-442-004 LOMITAS
055-251 -007 MORRORD 055-442-005 SANTA LUCIA
055-252-001 MORRORD 055-442-006 SANTA LUCIA
055-252-005 SANMARCOS 055-442-007 SANTA LUCIA
055-252-008 SANMARCOS 055-451 -014 LOMITAS
055-252-014 SAN MARCOS 055-451 -015 LOMITAS
055-252-016 MORRORD 055-451 -016 LOMITAS
055-252-017 SANMARCOS 055-451 -018 LOMITAS
055-261 -004 MORRORD 055-451 -019 LOMITAS
055-261 -005 MORRORD 055-451 -020 LOMITAS
055-261 -006 SANMARCOS 055-451 -021 LOMITAS
055-261 -012 MORRORD 055-451 -022 LOMITAS
055-261 -013 SANMARCOS 055-451 -025 LOMITAS
055-261 -014 SANMAROOS 055-451 -026 LOMITAS
055-311 -008 PALAVEADE 055-451 -027 SANTA LUCIA
055-311 -009 MORRORD 055-451 -028 SANTA LUCIA
055-311 -010 MORRO RD 055-451 -030 SANTA LUCIA
055-311 -011 PALOVERDE 055-451 -033 LOMITAS
055-311 -012 PALO VERDE 055-462-002 SANTA LUCIA
055-311 -013 MORRORD 055-462-004 SANTA LUCIA
055-311 -015 PALO VERDE
055-311 -016 PALO VERDE
055-311 -017 PALO VERDE
5
-311 -018 MORRO RD
- ,
55-321 -007 MORRO RD
055-321 -008 MORRORD
C-55-321 -009 MORRORD
WEED ABATEMENT EXHIBIT A-ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER/STREET 40
066-031 -029 CORCMAR 056-091 -038 CORCMAR
056-031 -031 CORCMAR 056-091 -039 CURBARIL
056-03-1 -033 EL CAMINO RL 056-091 -043 CRISTOBAL
056-031 -034 EL CAMINO RL 056-101 -005 ATASCADERO
056-031 -035 EL CAMINO RL 056-101 -007 COROMAR
056-031 -036 COROMAR 056-101 -010 ATASCADERO
056-031 -038 EL CAMINO RL 056-101 -011 ATASCADERO
056-031 -041 CORCMAR 056-101 -012 ATASCADERO
056-031 -042 COROMAR 056-101 -013 ATASCADERO
056-031 -044 EL CAMINO RL 056-111 -015 CORCMAR
056-031 -046 CORCMAR 056-111 -019 CORCMAR
056-031 -047 CORCMAR 056-111 -020 COROMAR
056-031 -048 OOR31MR 056-111 -024 COROMAR
0,56-041 -012 CORCMAR 056-111 -025 CORCMAR
0 5 6.0 41 -014 CORCMAR
056-111 -027 CORCMAR
056-041 -017 COROMAR 056-111 -028 CORCN%R
056-041 -023 CORCMAR 056-111 -029 COROMAR
056-041 -025 COFOW 056-111 -030 COROMAR
056-041 -026 CORCMAR 056-111 -032 COROMAR
056-041 -033 COROMAR 056-111 -033 CORCMAR
056-041 -037 CORCMAR 056-121 -005 CORCMAR
056-041 -040 CORCMAR 056-121 -014 CORCMAR
056-041 -041 CORCMAR 056-121 -022 OORCMAR
056-041 -048 CORCMAR 056-121 -023 CORCMAR
0 56-051 -014 EL CAMINO RL 056-121 -030 CORCMAR
056-051 -021 EL CAMINO RL 056-121 -032 CORCMAR
056-051 -029 LA LINIA 056-121 -033 CORCMAR
056-051 -047 PLATA 056-121 -034 CORCMAR
056-051 -048 PLATA 056-121 -035 CORCMAR
056-051 -049 PLATA 056-131 -015 PORTOLA
056-051 -050 PLATA 056-131 -017 WESTFRONT
056-051 -051 PLATA 056-131 -018 WESTFRONT
056-061 -018 EL CAMINO RL 056-131 -019 WESTFRONT
056-061 -024 EL CAMINO RL 056-141 -006 SANTAROSA
056-061 -025 EL CAMINO RL 056-141 -008 SANTAROSA
056-061 -026 EL CAMINO RL 056-141 -009 SANTAROSA
056-061 -028 EL CAMINO RL 056-141 -011 SANTTAROSA
056-061 -029 EL CAMINO RL 056-141 -012 SANTAROSA
056-071 -010 EL CAMINO RL 056-141 -016 SANTA ROSA
056-071 -011 EL CAMINO RL 056-141 -017 SANTTA ROSA
056-081 -013 MO TTECITO 056-141 -018 SANTAROSA
056-081 -015 EL CAMINO RL 056-141 -019 SANTA ROSA
056-08-1 -028 MONTECI TO 056-151 -005 SAN GABRIEL
056-081 -029 MONTECTTO 056-151 -007 SAN GABRIEL
056-091 -009 CURBARIL 056-151 -009 SAN GABRIEL
056-091 -017 CURBARIL 056-151 -021 SANTAROSA
056-091 -026 CORCMAR 056-151 -027 SANTAROSA
056-091 -028 CORCMAR 056-151 -028 SANTA
056-091 -029 CORCMAR 056-151 -029 SANTAROSA
056-091 -030 CORCMAR 056-151 -030 SANTA
056-091 -031 CORCMAR 056-151 -032 SANTAROSA
056-091 -035 COROMAR 056-151 -036 SAN GABRIEL
056-091 -036 CORCMAR 056-151 -041 SAN GABRIEL `
056-091 -037 CORCMAR 056-151 -042 SAN GABRIEL
WEED ABATEMENT EXHIBIT A - ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER/STREET 41
056-162-004 SAN GABRIEL 056-201 -021 ATASCADEROAVE
056-162-005 SAN GABRIEL 056-201 -028 SAN GABRIEL
• 056-162-006 SAN GABRIEL 056-201 -029 SAN GABRIEL
056-162-007 SAN GABRIEL 056-201 -030 SANTAROSA
056-162-008 SAN GABRIEL 056-201 -033 SANTAROSA
056-162-009 SAN GABRIEL 056-201 -034 ATASCADEROAVE
056-162-010 SAN GABRIEL 056-201 -035 ATASCADERO AVE
056-162-011 SAN GABRIEL 056-201 -03 6 ATASCADEROAVE
056-162-013 WEST FRONT 056-201 -037 ATASCADEROAVE
056-162-014 WEST FRONT 056-211 -003 SAN RAFAEL
0 56-162-015 WEST FRONT 056-211 -015 ATASCADERO AVE
056-162-016 WEST FRONT 056-211 -015 ATASCADERO AVE
056-162-017 SAN RAFAEL 056-211 -020 ATASCADERO AVE
056-162-018 SAN RAFAEL 056-211 -022 ATASCADEROAVE
0 56-162-019 SAN RAFAEL 056-211 -037 ATASCADERO AVE
056-162-021 SAN RAFAEL 056-211 -038 ATASCADEROAVE
056-162-022 CIRCLE OAK DR 056-211 -039 ATASCADEROAVE
056-162-025 CIRCLE OAK DR 056-211 -044 ATASCADERO AVE
056-162-026 CIRCLE OAK DR 056-221 -014 MARCHANT
056-162-028 CIRCLE OAK DR 056-221 -020 MARCHANT
056-162-030 SAN RAFAEL 056-221 -021 MARCHANT
056-162-031 SAN RAFAEL 056-221 -022 MARCHANT
056-162-032 SAN GABRIEL 056-221 -023 MARCHANT
056-171 -009 MARCHANT 056-221 -025 ATASCADERO AVE
056-171 -015 MARCHANT 056-221 -026 ATASCADERO AVE
056-171 -0.16 MARCHANT 056-221 -028 ATASCADERO AVE
056-171 -020 MARCHANT 056-231 -008 ATASCADERO AVE
•
056-171 -021 MARC IAN T 056-231 -014 ATASCADERO AVE
056-171 -028 CRISTOBAL 056-231 -015 ATASCADERO AVE
056-171 -029 MARCHAN C 056-231 -022 ATASCADERO AVE
056-171 -031 ATASCADEROAVE 056-241 -003 PORTCXA
056-171 -032 ATASCADEROAVE 056-241 -007 PORfCLA
056-171 -036 ATASCADERO AVE 056-241 -010 PORTOLA
056-171 -039 ATASGADEROAVE 056-241 -011 PORTC LA
056-171 -044 ATASCADERO AVE 056-241 -013 PORTO A
056-171 -045 ATASCADERO AVE 056-241 -017 ATASCADERO AVE
056-171 -046 ATASCADERO AVE 056-241 -018 PORTCLA
056-171 -049 CRISTOBAL 056-242-002 ATASC.ADEROAVE
056-171 -050 CRISTOBAL 056-242-006 ATASCADEROAVE
056-181 -003 ATASCADERO AVE 056-242-008 ATASCADEAO AVE
056-181 -006 PORTCLA 056-242-009 ATASCADEROAVE
056-181 -013 ATASCADERO AVE 056-251 -010 SANTA ROSA
056-181 -015 ATASCADEROAVE 056-251 -012 SANTAROSA
056-181 -016 ATA 9CADERO AVE 056-251 -013 SANTA ROSA
056-181 -019 ATASCADERO AVE 056-251 -017 ATASCADEAO AVE
056-181 -020 PORTOLA 056-251 -018 ATASCADERO AVE
056-181 -022 PORTCLA 056-251 -019 ATASCADEROAVE
056-191 -034 PORTCLA 056-251 -020 ATASCADEROAVE
056-191 -035 PORIiOLA 056-251 -021 ATASCADEROAVE
056-191 -036 PORTCLA 056-251 -024 ALLEGRE
056-201 -003 SANTA ROSA 056-251 -033 ATASCADERO AVE
056-201 -01-2 SAN GABRIEL 056-251 -034 ATASCADERO AVE
056-201 -015 SAN GABRIEL 056-251 -035 ATASCADEROAVE
056-201 -016 SAN GABRIEL 056-261 -004 SANTAROSA
WEED ABATEMENT EXHIBIT A- ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER/STREET 42
056-261 -011 SAN GABRIEL 056-301 -009 SANTAROSA
056-261 -013 SAN GABRIEL 056-301 -01 8 SANTAROSA
056-261 -01 9 ATASCADEROAVE 056-301 -030 SANTAROSA
056-261 -025 SAN GABRIEL 056-301 -031 SANTAROSA
056-261 -049 SAN GABRIEL 056-301 -032 SANTAROSA
056-261 -057 ATASCADEROAVE 056-301 -034 SANTAROSA
056-261 -058 SANTAROSA 056-301 -035 SANTAROSA
056-261 -059 SANTAROSA 056-301 -036 SANTAROSA
056-261 -061 SAN GABRIEL 056-311 -001 MOUNTAIN VIEW
056-261 -063 SANTAROSA 056-311 -010 MOUNTAIN VIEW
056-261 -064 SANTAROSA 056-312-003 MOUNTAIN VIEW
056-261 -065 SANTAROSA 056-31 2-004 MOUNTAIN VIEW
056-261 -066 SANTAROSA 056-312-007 MOUNTAIN VIEW
056-261 -068 SAN GABRIEL 056-312-008 LAKE VIEW
056-261 -070 SAN GABRIEL 056-312-028 MOUNTAIN VIEW
056-261 -071 SAN GABRIEL 056-312-029 MOUNTAIN VIEW
056-261 -072 SANTAROSA 056-312-033 MOUNTAIN VIEW
056-261 -073 SANTAROSA 056-321 -020 MOUNTAIN VIEW
056-261 -074 SANTAROSA 056-322-001 MOUNTAIN VIEW
056-261 -076 ATASCADEROAVE 056-322-006 MOUNTAIN VIEW
056-261 -077 ATASCADEROAVE 056-322-007 MOUNTAIN VIEW
056-261 -078 SANGABRIEL 056-322-010 SANTAROSA
056-261 -080 ATASCADEROAVE 056-322-011 SANTAROSA
056-261 -082 SAN GABRIEL 056-322-017 LAKE VIEW
056-261 -083 SAN GABRIEL 056-322-018 LAKE VIEW
056-261 -084 CALENTALANE 056-322-019 LAKE VIEW
056-261 -085 CALENTALANE 056-322-023 LAKE VIEW
056-261 -086 CALENTALANE 056-322-024 MOUNTAIN VIEW
056-261 -087 CALENTA LANE 056-322-026 MOUNTAIN VIEW
056-261 -089 CALENTALANE 056-322-028 MOUNTAIN VIEW
056-262-001 SANTAROSA 056-322-029 MOUNTAIN VIEW
056-262-010 SANTAROSA 056-322-032 MOUNTAIN VIEW
056-271 -010 SAN GABRIEL 056-351 -011 SAN GABRIEL
056-271 -011 ATASCADERO AVE 056-351 -019 SAN GABRIEL
056-271 -020 ATASCADEROAVE 056-351 -022 SANTAROSA
056-271 -025 ATASC.ADEROAVE 056-351 -024 SAN GABRIEL
056-271 -026 ATASCADEROAVE 056-351 -026 SANTAROSA
056-271 -030 SANGABRIEL 056-351 -027 SANTAROSA
056-271 -031 ATASCADEROAVE 056-351 -029 SAN GABRIEL
056-271 -032 ATASCADEROAVE 056-351 -031 SAN GABRIEL
056-27i -033 SAN GABRIEL 056-351 -033 SAN GABRIEL
056-271 -034 SAN GABRIEL 056-351 -035 SAN GABRIEL
056-271 -035 SAN GABRIEL 056-351 -036 SANTAROSA
056-271-036 SAN GABRIEL 056-351 -037 SANTAROSA.
056-271 -037 ATASCADEROAVE 056-351 -038 SAN GABRIEL
056-271 -039 ATASCADEROAVE 056-351 -041 SANTAROSA
056-271 -040 ATASCADEROAVE 056-351 -042 SANTAROSA
056-281 -006 PORTCLA 056-351 -046 SAN GABRIEL
056-281 -011 PORTCLA 056-351 -047 SANGABRIEL
056-291 -001 PORTCLA 056-351 -049 SAN GABRIEL
056-291 -003 PORTCLA 056-351 -050 SAN GABRIEL
056-291 -004 PORTCLA 056-361 -021 SAN GABRIEL
056-291 -006 PORTCLA 056-361 -022 SAN GABRIEL
056-301 -008 SANTAROSA 056-361 -024 SAN GABRIEL
WEED ABATEMENT EXHIBIT A- ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER/STREET 43
056-361 -025 SAN GABRIEL 056-451 -005 OLD MORRO RDE
056-361 -026 SAN GABRIEL 056-451 -006 OLD MORRO RDE
056-361 -027 SAN GABRIEL 056-451 -010 OLD MORRO RD E
056-371 -023 SAN GABRIEL 056-461 -002 SAN DIEGO
056-371 -024 SAN GABRIEL 056-461 -003 SAN DIEGO
056-371 -025 SAN GABRIEL 056-461 -004 SAN DEGO
0 56-371 -026 SAN GABRIEL 056-461 -005 SANDE-GO
056-371 -02 9 SAN GABRIEL 056-461 -006 SAN DIEGO
056-371 -031 SAN GABRIEL 056-461 -007 SAN DIEGO
056-371 -032 SAN GABRIEL 056-471 -001 TC1.090
056-371 -037 SAN GABRIEL 056-471 -002 SAN DIMAS
056-371 -038 SAN GABRIEL 056-471 -003 SAN DIMAS
056-381 -009 SAN GABRIEL 056-471 -004 SAN DIMAS
056-383-021 ELCAMINORL 056-471 -005 SAN DIMAS
056-383-023 ELCAMINO RL 056-471 -006 SAN DIMAS
056-402-001 TcLos0 056-471 -006 SAN DIMAS
056-402-002 TCLtsO 056-471 -007 SAN DIMAS
056-402-003 TCLcso 056-471 -008 SAN DI
056-402-004 TCLOSO 056-471 -010 SAN DIEGO
056-402-005 TCLCSO 056-471 -011 SAN DIEGO
056-402-010 SAN DIEGO 056-471 -012 SAN DIEGO
056-402-013 SAN DIEGO 056-472-001 Tamm
056-402-014 SAN DIEGO 056-472-002 SAN DIMAS
056-402-015 SAN DIEGO 056-472-003 SAN DIMAS
056-411 -003 CASTENADA 056-472-004 LoscsoS
056-411 -005 CAST13l" 056-472-005 SAN DIMAS
056-411 -007 MORRO RD 056-481 -003 SAN DIMAS
056-411 -008 MORRO RD 056-481 -004 LOSOSOS
056-411 -009 OLD MORRO RDE 056-481 -005 LCsOSOS
056-411 -011 MORRORD 056-481 -006 SAN DINt
056-411 -012 LCSCSOSRD 056-481-007 SANDIMAS
056-411 -014 LOSCSOSRD 056-481 -008 LoSC60S
056-411 -015 LOS OSCSRD 056-481 -009 SAN DIMAS
056-411 -016 TCLcm 056-481 -010 SAN DIMAS
056-411 -017 TCLcm 056-491 -001 Lc)SOSOS
056-411 -018 TCLom 056-491 -001 SAN DIMAS LN
056-411 -019 CASTENADA 056-491 -002 SAN DIMAS LN
.0561%411 -020 CASTE ADA 056-491 -003 SAN DIMAS LN
056-41 T-0.21 CASTENADA 056-491 -004 SAN DIMAS LN
056-411 -022 CASTENADA 056-491 -005 SAN RAFAEL
056-411 -023 TCLo60 056-491 -006 SAN RAFAEL
056-411 -024 TOLD50 056-491 -007 SAN RAFAEL
056-431 -001 CARMELITA 056-491 -008 SAN RAFAEL
056-431 -002 CARMELITA 056-491 -009 SAN RAFAEL
056-431 -003 CARMELITA 056-491 -010 SAN RAFAEL
056-432-001 CARMELITA 056-491 -011 SAN RAFAEL
056-432-002 CASTTA 056-491 -012 SAN RAFAEL
056-432-003 CASITA 056-491 -013 SAN RAFAEL
056-432-004 CARMELITA 056-491 -014 LOSOSCS
056-432-005 CARMELITA 056-491 -015 Lc)ScsoS
056-451 -001 OLD MORRO RD E 056-491 -016 IcsCSCS
056-451 -002 OLD MORRO RDE 056-491 -017 LC6CSOS
056-451 -003 OLD MORRO RDE 056-491 -018 LOSOSOS
056-451 -004 OLD MORRO RDE 056-491 -019 LoSOSCS
WEED ABATEMENT EXHIBIT A-ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER/STREET 44
456-491 -020 LOSOSOS '
056-491 -022 LOSCSOS
056-491 -023 LCSCSOS
056-491 -024 LOSOSOS
056-491 -025 LOSOSOS
056-491 -026 LOSCSCS
056-491 -029 LOSOSOS
056-491 -030 LOSOSOS
056-491 -031 LOSOSOS
056-502-002 SAN CARLOS
056-502-006 LOSOSOS
056-502-007 LOSOSOS
056-502-008 LCSCSCS
056-502-009 LCS060S
L
t
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF RTAS ADERO Item No: C-2
Through: Ray Windsor, City Manager Meeting Date 5/ 28/91
File No: ZC ' 03-91
Via: Henry Engen, Community Development Director
From: oAteven L. Decamp, City Planner
USJECT:
Amendment of the Zoning Ordinance to include specific development
standards for projects to be undertaken in Planned Development
Overlay Zone V .
REC NDATION:
1 . Waive reading of Ordinance No. 222 in full and approve
by title only; and
2 . Approve` Ordinance No. 222 (as amended below) on first
reading.
BACKGROUND
The City Council and the Planning Commission have both expressed
concern regarding the lack of standards to guide the design and
review of projects to be undertaken within the PD 7 -Overlay Zone.
Indeed, 'even project applicants have expressed a desire for more
specific_ guidance for project design.
The attached draft ordinance contains the design standards
developed by the Planning- Commission following numerous study
sessions and'a public hearing 'held on April 16, 1991 .
ANALYSIS:
The Planning Commission (as well as staff) believes that
residential development within PD 7 Overlay Zones provides a
viable, alternative style of housing that is otherwise
unavailable within Atascadero. For residents, this type of
project provides for a wider variety of housing types and costs.
For the City, the recently completed Fiscal Analysis (Crawford
Multari & Starr) indicates on page 86 that " [Brom a fiscal
standpoint, single family units produce more revenue than multi-
family ones. " This rational is followed on page 87 by
recommended Policy A-3:
"The City shall allow a variety of housing types in multi-
family zones . Specifically, the City will allow (subject to
discretionary review and after considering other factors
such as environmental, impacts, neighborhood compatibility,
affordability and project design) planned development and/or
condominium ,projects ` which allow detached units on
individual lots or as airspace condominiums in multi-family
districts . "
The 'suggested design guidelines articulate specific minimum
standards for PD 7 projects . The attached staff report dated
April 16, 1991 provides a brief statement of the rational for
each of the proposed standards. The standards have been crafted
in such a manner as to insurethat significant flexibility
remains for the project designer to accommodate individual site
characteristics as well as provide for architectural creativity
and individuality:
Additional analysis has revealed that proposed standard "h" may
be overly restrictive and may inhibit architectural flexibility
to a `significant degree. Staff therefore recommends that this
standard be modified to read 1 . . . 75% of the habitable r s area
of the first floor. " This modification; will insure that the
Commission' s desire to decrease the bulk of two story structures
will be implemented while retaining additional flexibility for
the building designer.
- ATTACHMENTS . Exhibit A - Draft Ordinance No. 222
Exhibit B - PC Staff- Report (April 16, 1991)
Exhibit C - PC Minute Excerpts (March 19, 1991)
Exhibit D - PC Minute Excerpts dApril 16, 1991)
•
EXHIBIT A 3
• ORDINANCE NO. 222
AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO
AMENDING SECTION 9-3. 651 (ESTABLISHMENT OF PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY ZONE NO. 7) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE
BY THE ADDITION OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
(ZC 03-91; City of Atascadero)
WHEREAS, the proposed zoning ordinance text amendment is
consistent with the General Plan as required by Section 65860 of
the California Government Code; and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendment is in conformance with
Section 65800 et seq. of the California Government Code
concerning zoning regulations; and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendments will not have a significant
adverse impact upon the environment . The Negative Declaration
prepared for the project is adequate; and
WHEREAS, the Atascadero Planning Commission held a public
hearing on April 16, 1991 and has recommended approval of Zone
Change 03-91 .
• NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Atascadero does
ordain as follows :
Section 1 . Council Findings .
1 . The proposal is compatible with the surrounding land
use and zoning.
2 . The proposal is consistent with the General Plan
land use element and other elements contained in the
General Plan, and specifically, policies pertaining to
residential development .
3 . The proposal will not result in any significant
adverse environmental impacts . The Negative
Declaration prepared for the project is adequate .
Section 2 . Zoning Text .
The Zoning Ordinance text is hereby amended by the deletion
of Section 9-3 . 643 (d) and the amendment of Section 9-3 . 651 as
shown on the attached Exhibit A.
Section 3 . Publication .
• The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published
once within fifteen (15) days after its passage in the Atascadero •
News, a newspaper of general circulation, printed, published, and
circulated in the City in accordance with Section 36933 of the
Ordinance #222 •
Government Code; shall certify the adopting and posting of this
ordinance and shall cause this ordinance and this certification
together with proof of posting to be entered into the Book of
Ordinances of the City.
Section 4 . Effective Date.
This ordinance shall go into effect and be in full force and
effect at 12 : 01 a.m. on the 31st day after its passage.
On motion by and seconded by
, the foregoing Ordinance is approved
by the following role call vote :
AYES :
NOES :
ABSENT:
DATE ADOPTED :
By. •ROBERT B. LILLEY, Mayor
City of Atascadero, California
ATTEST:
LEE DAYKA, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT
RAY WINDSOR, City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ART MONTANDON, City Attorney
PREPARED BY:
HENRY ENGEN, Community Development Director
• EXHIBIT A
9-3 . 651 . Establishment of Planned Development Overlay Zone No . 7
(PD7) : T-he A Planned Development Overlay Zone No. 7 4r-& may be
established as shown on the effiejej 4.04,11.11,j 2ttaps (Seetien
3 . 102-)- in multiple family residential zones . The following
development standards are established shall be applied to all
proiects within Planned Development Zone No 7 •
(a) ire A Master Plan -of Development of the site 4-s shall
be approved.
All
construction and development shall be done in
conformance with the approved Exhibit master plan. Arry
Med:ifieatian of the Master Plan site design may be
Permit (Seetlen 9-2 . 199) .
in &PProv�ng a Master Plan ef Bevelepment, the level of
redteed to a Plot Plan prev�ded that the Mester Plan
•
determination .
.7..a._ _ _t .
}�b No subsequent Pet Plan, P-reuse Planeenditie
Use Permit, er Tentative Parcel or Tract Map shall
be approved unless found to be consistent with the
approved Master Plan of Development . Arry
4:nelud�:ng eond4:tiens thereof, shall be
eeeemplished-as set forth inSuDs-eetion (a) ate
this S--'' - .
c) The parent lot or lots in combination must be no less
than one-half (1/2) acre.
(dZ The Parent lot or lots shall have frontage on a public
street .
(e) Each dwelling unit shall be subject to review under the
City' s Appearance Review Guidelines .
(fZ Building setbacks shall be as follows :
Front yard at residence - 15 feet
Front yard at garage - 20 feet
Side wards (combined) - 10 feet
Rear _yard (single-story) - 10 feet
Rear yard (two-story) - 15 feet •
(q)_ Building coverage (residence plus garage footprint)
shall not exceed 35% of the individual lot area .
Landscaping shall constitute a minimum of 40% of the •
lot area. The measurement of landscaped areas shall be
exclusive of driveways, patios, decks, etc
(h) Two story residences shall have a second floor that is
limited to 75% of the habitable area of the first
floor .
(i) All mechanical ecruipment, including HVAC units and
utility meters, shall be screened from view from
adlacent streets and properties .
(1) Exterior fencing shall be consistent throughout the
prosect . Design and appearance of fences and/or walls
shall be compatible with the design of the dwelling
units .
(k)_ Accessory buildings (sheds, etc) will be allowed;
however, the footprint of such accessory buildings will
count toward the maximum percent of allowable building
coverage .
(1) Each proposed lot shall have a minimum frontage of
forty-five (45) feet, except that lots at the end of a
cul-de-sac may be forty (40) feet .
(m) Parking for two resident vehicles shall be provided in
a garage with minimum interior dimensions of 20' X 201 .
One guest parking space of at least 10' X 20' shall be
Provided on each individual lot . The driveway area may
be used to satisfy the guest parking requirement . On-
street parking shall not be used to satisfy the parking
requirements .
(n) open space shall be provided for each
residential unit at a ratio of 300 square feet for the
first two (2) bedrooms . Each bedroom in excess of two
(2) shall cause the private open space to be increased
by 50 square feet . The required front yard setback
area shall not be used to satisfy the open space
requirement; however, side and rear setback areas may
be utilized. The minimum width of the private open
space area shall not be less than ten (10) feet .
(o) Individual trash collection shall be used for each
residential unit . Provisions shall be made for storage
of trash cans within the garage or fenced area.
(P)_ All utilities, including electric, telephone and cable,
along the frontage of and within the PD shall be
installed underground.
• (q) Alterations or additions to established dwelling units
shall be subiect to the density standards of the
• underlying zone and shall be reviewed pursuant to the
City' s Appearance Review Guidelines
(r) All dwelling units shall be equipped with water
conservation devices to include low-flow shower heads
and toilets, and drip irrigation systems .
•
EXHIBIT B
CITY OF ATASCADERO Item: B-2 •
STAFF REPORT
FOR: Planning Commission Meeting Date : April 16, 1991
BY: 61OSteven L. DeCamp, City Planner File No: ZC 03-91
SUBJECT:
Amendment of the Zoning Ordinance text by adoption of specific
development standards for projects to be undertaken in Planned
Development Overlay Zone No . 7 .
RECOMMENDATION:
The Commission should recommend that the City Council adopt the
development standards for PD7 shown in the attached draft
ordinance (Attachment B) .
SITUATION AND FACTS:
1 . Applicant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .City of Atascadero •
8 . Environmental Status . . . . . . . . .Negative Declaration posted
March 27, 1991
BACKGROUND:
The Planning Commission, City Council, and project applicants
alike have lamented the lack of specific development standards to
be used when preparing or reviewing proposals for projects
utilizing the PD7 Overlay Zone . Also lacking has been guidance
as to what constitutes appropriate "amenities" or "benefits" to
be derived through the approval of such projects .
At the Commission' s March 19, 1991 meeting, discussion was held
on a range of potential development standards to be imposed on
PD7 projects . This report, and the attached draft ordinance
reflects the direction given to staff at the conclusion of the
March meeting.
ANALYSIS:
Both the General Plan and the Zoning Ordinance establish policies
and standards to guide the development of property within the
City . The General Plan, in Policy Proposal 6, provides for the
creation of small lot subdivisions in conjunction with planned
residential developments . That policy states : •
• "Multi.-family residential use areas shall have a minimum
building site of one-half acre. Smaller lot sizes may be
2
allowed in conjunction with planned residential
developments, including planned mobil home developments and
subdivisions, provided that the overall density within the
project is consistent with other density standards contained
herein . "
The Zoning Ordinance also makes provision for Planned Development
Overlay Zones as a vehicle for modifying development standards in
appropriate locations and for appropriate types of development
projects . The relevant Zoning Ordinance sections are:
119-3 . 641 . Purpose: The Planned Development Overlay Zone
identifies areas where development standards or processing
procedures different from those established by the
underlying zoning district, Chapter 9-4 or Chapter 9-6, are
deemed necessary to promote orderly and harmonious
development and to enhance the opportunity to best utilize
special characteristics of an area.
119-3 . 642 . Applicability of Planned Development Standards.:
The standards of Section 9-3 . 645 et seq apply to all uses
for which a zoning approval is required that are located in
a Planned Development Overlay Zone.
• 119-3 . 643 . Minimum Development Standards and Processing
Requirements : The development standards, special use
standards and processing requirements of the underlying
zoning district shall apply in a Planned Development Overlay
Zone unless specifically modified, to a greater or lesser
extent, by a Planned Development Overlay Zone . The Planned
Development Overlay Zone may be used as follows :
(a) To modify setbacks; heights; parking and loading;
landscaping, screening and fencing; signs; streets and
frontage improvements; and, other development and
special use standards set forth in Chapters 9-4 and 9-
6; and
(b) to modify processing procedures set forth by the
underlying zoning district (Chapter 9-3) ; and
(c) to establish other development standards or processing
requirements; and
(d) to modify minimum lot sizes or permitted density.'
1 The General Plan stipulates that planned residential developments can
. be approved ". . .provided that the overall density within the project is •
consistent with other density standards contained herein." Because the
General Plan prevails where inconsistencies exist, that portion of the Zoning
Ordinance suggesting that higher residential densities can be approved with
3
119-3 . 644 . Required Findings : In approving the
establishment of a Planning Development Overlay Zone, the
following findings shall be made :
(a) Modification of development standards or processing
requirements is warranted to promote orderly and
harmonious development .
(b) Modification of development standards or processing
requirements will enhance the opportunity to best
utilize special characteristics of an area and will
have a beneficial effect on the area.
(c) Benefits derived from the overlay zone cannot be
reasonably achieved through existing development
standards or processing requirements .
(d) Proposed plans, if any, offer certain redeeming
features to compensate for requested modifications . "
Several Planned Development Overlay Zones have been developed
based on the concepts and procedures contained within the above
referenced Zoning Ordinance sections . Of particular interest at
this time is Planned Development Overlay Zone 7 . In 1986, .
considerable interest was expressed in the concept of creating
small lot subdivisions within multiple family zones as a means of
providing moderately priced single family homes . Because the
City saw merit in the concept of providing alternative housing
opportunities (and a means of reducing the number of multiple
family rental units being constructed) , a generic Planned
Development Zone, PD7, was created. The language of PD7 is as
follows :
"9-3 . 651 . Establishment of Planned Development Overlay Zone
No . 7 (PD7) : The Planned Development Overlay zone No. 7 is
established as shown on the official zoning maps (Section 9-
1 . 102) . The following development standards are
established:
(a) The Master Plan of Development of the site is approved
as shown on Exhibit B which is hereby made a part of
this ordinance by reference . All construction and
development shall be done in conformance with the
approved Exhibit . Any modification in density will
require a rezoning. Modification of the Master Plan
site design may be approved in a manner prescribed for
planned developments is not implemented. It will be recommended that this
• section of the zoning Ordinance be deleted concurrently with the approval of •
the ordinance amending the PD7 -development standards.
a ConditionalUse Permit 4
(Section 9-2 . 109)
(b) In approving a Master Plan of Development, the
Processing for subsequent level of
reduced to a Plot Plan Projects or phases may be
contains sufficient detail vtoeSu pood that the Master Plan
determination. PPort such a
(c) No subsequent Plot Plan, Precise Plan, Conditional
Permit, or Tentative Parcel or Tract Map shall be Use
approved unless found to be consistent with the
approved Master Plan of Development . An
a Master Plan of Development, including conditionst to
thereof, shall be accomplished as set forth in
Subsection (a) of this Section. vt
As can readily be seen
specific development standards, snor gdoes section ov does not
amenities or benefits to be derived through the a Provide
provide suggested
projects . Staff review of PD7 applications
been
based
of such
subjective development criteria and a continued belief
PPlications has been based on
provision of alternative forms and that the
legitimate means of addressing the Price ranges of housing is a
Element, and the principal benefit toabe derivedls Of the Cfrom ssHousing
projects . such
• Although therov' '
o
remains an importantbenefittofnativeplannedoresn
experience has shown that the imposition of opportunities
residential developments,
that will provide a broader range of amenities frommh projects
suc standards
is highly desirable.
c
In addition to the input provided b
analyzed existing and Y the Commission, staff has
reviewed relevant planningoliteratureooncthets lsubject, any
collected and reviewed the planned development ordinances
other area cities to facilitate the creation of specific
and
development standards for Atascadero, from
in the p This analysis has resulted
preparation of proposed development standards to be made a
part of the Zoning Ordinance provisions governing PD7 projects .
Proposed Development Standards
Listed below are each of the
or
standards recommended for inclusiionewithinmthe ePlannedopment
Development section Zoning Ordinance.
discussion of the rational for each of then included a short
proposed standards .
Standard (a) : A Master Plan of Development of the site
shall
approved. All construction and developmentshall
• be done in conformance with the approved master •
plan.
5 •
Rational : This standard stipulates that a Master Plan of
Development must be submitted with, and approved
concurrently with the creation of a PD7 overlay zone.
It is also stipulated that all future construction must
be in conformance with the approved master plan.
Standard (b) : No subsequent Tentative Parcel or Tract Map shall
be approved unless found to be consistent with the
approved Master Plan of Development .
Rational : As with Standard (a) above, the section simply requires
that any future subdivision map submitted to implement
the PD7 overlay zone must be drawn in conformance with
the approved master plan. (In practice, applications
for rezoning to the PD7 overlay are always accompanied
by the tentative subdivision map. )
Standard (c) : The parent lot or lots in combination must be no
less than one-half (1/2) acre.
Rational : This standard would insure that adequate area is
available to allow flexibility and creativity in site
design. In addition, it would insure that existing
nonconforming lots would not be made smaller. •
Standard (d) : The parent lot or lots shall have frontage on a
public street .
Rational : This standard is intended to avoid the confusion that
can result from the further subdivision, and creation
of additional dwelling units on a flag lot .
Standard (e) : Each dwelling unit shall be subject to review
under the City' s Appearance Review Guidelines .
Rational : This standard would insure that the structures within a
PD would be architecturally compatible . This standard
would also allow for architectural design and detailing
that would be appropriate for small size lots in high
density areas .
Standard (f) : Building setbacks shall be as follows :
Front yard at residence - 15 feet
Front yard at garage - 20 feet
Side yard - 5 feet
Rear yard (single-story) - 10 feet
• Rear yard (two-story) - 15 feet •
Rational : This standard would encourage the front of the
• 6
residence to be placed closer to the street than the
garage . This arrangement provides an improved
appearance for the project and fosters a heightened
sense of community. In addition, it provides a greater
rear buffer for two-story buildings .
Standard (g) : Building coverage (residence plus garage
footprint) shall not exceed 35% of the lot area.
Landscaping shall constitute a minimum of 40% of
the lot area. The measurement of the landscaped
areas shall be exclusive of driveways, patios,
decks, etc .
Rational : Limiting building coverage to 35% of the lot area will
provide residences at a scale in keeping with the
smaller than normal lot sizes . Requiring that the
minimum 40% landscaped area exclude driveways, etc .
will provide useable open space for the occupants of
the dwelling unit .
Standard (h) : Two story residences shall have a second floor
• that is limited to 75% of the habitable area of
the first floor.
Rational : This standard will insure some variance in building
bulk and mass and should eliminate "bunker" style
structures .
Standard (i) : All mechanical equipment, including HVAC units and
utility meters, shall be screened from view from
adjacent streets and properties .
Rational : This standard will insure that the appearance of the PD
will not be detrimental or intrude on adjacent roads or
properties .
Standard (i) : Exterior fencing shall be consistent throughout
the project . Design and appearance of fences
and/or walls shall be compatible with the design
of the dwelling units .
Rational : This standard will ensure that the appearance of the
project is cohesive and that fencing will be designed
as an integral part of the site development .
• Standard (k) : Accessory buildings (sheds, etc) will be allowed; •
however, the footprint of such accessory buildings
will count toward the maximum percent of allowable
building coverage .
Rational : This will ensure that the landscaped open space area of
each lot will not be reduced through the installation
of accessory structures .
Standard (1) : Each proposed lot shall have a minimum width of
forty-five (45) feet, except that lots at the end
of a cul-de-sac may be forty (40) feet .
Rational : The purpose of this standard is to ensure that each
residential lot will have a useable minimum area.
Irregularly shaped lots do not provide the same
flexibility in building location or open space
utilization as do lots with sufficient width.
Standard (m) : Parking for two resident vehicles shall be
provided in a garage with minimum interior
dimensions of 20' X 201 . One guest parking space
of at least 10' X 20' shall be provided on each
lot . The driveway area may be used to satisfy the •
guest parking requirement . On-street parking
shall not be used to satisfy the parking
requirements .
Rational : Small lots do not provide the same flexibility in
providing parking options as do larger lots . Allowing
the driveway to be used for guest parking will preclude
the need to pave additional portions of the lot .
Standard (n) : Private open space shall be provided for each
residential unit at a ratio of 300 square feet for
the first two bedrooms . Each bedroom in excess of
two shall cause the private open space to be
increased by 50 square feet . The required front
yard setback area shall not be used to satisfy the
open space requirement; however, side and rear
setback areas may be utilized. The minimum width
of the private open space area shall not be less
than ten (10) feet .
Rational : The intent here is to provide a useable, private open
space area for each residential unit .
• Standard (o) : Individual trash collection shall be used for each •
residential unit . Provisions shall be made for
storage of trash cans within the garage or fenced
8
area.
Rational : Trash cans should not be stored where visible from
surrounding areas . Common trash enclosures are not
appropriate in single family residential developments .
Standard (p) : All utilities, including electric, telephone, and
cable along the frontage of and within the PD
shall be installed underground.
Rational : Overhead utility lines are aesthetically unappealing
and are particularly obtrusive in small lot
subdivisions .
Standard (q) : Alterations or additions to established dwelling
units shall be subject to the density standards of
the underlying zone and review pursuant to the
City' s Appearance Review Guidelines .
Rational : After the initial review and approval of a project,
subsequent owners and/or residents should not be
permitted to modify structures in a manner inconsistent
with the original approval .
Standard (r) : All dwelling units shall be equipped with water
conservation devices to include low-flow shower
heads and toilets, drip irrigation systems, and
where practicable, grey water irrigation systems .
Rational : Landscaping of higher density residential projects is
very important to the aesthetic appeal of the project .
The need to conserve water in arid regions is also
extremely important . This standard attempts to
reconcile what might appear to be competing demands by
requiring water conservation devices and irrigation
techniques that conserve, or reuse water.
CONCLUSIONS:
The development standards discussed above should (1) provide
guidance and direction for the preparation and the review of PD7
applications; and (2) insure that a higher level of amenities and
benefits are obtained than have been derived from similar
projects in the past .
ATTACHMENTS : Exhibit A - Negative Declaration •
Exhibit B - Draft Ordinance
ATTACHMENT A 1`
CITY OF ATASCADERO
�.7 ENVIRONMENTAL COORDINATO,
NEGATIVE DECLARATI
6
COWAUNM DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 6500 PALLIA AVE. ATASCADERO, CA 93422 (805) 461-5035
APPLICANT: 614Y aF A��S cq DGR o
PROJECT TITLE: Z o Nc. pcnlG 0 3-91
PROJECT LOCATION:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A me D MC NT d F 5 EG-I't eN 9-3.t051 o i- ikG
Z"1&LCr oR.D'UAUcL aY AV00TcoN Gr DEVa_,-�tO/004T � i Wu�lkfLOS
FINDINGS:
1. The project does not have the potential to degrade the environment.
2. The project will not achieve short-term to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals.
3. The project does not have impacts which are individually limited, but comulatively considerable.
4. The project will not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings either directly or indirectly.
DETERMINATION:
Based on the above findings. and the information contained in the initial study (made a part hereof by refer-
ence and on file in the Community Development Department), it has been determined that the above project
will not have an adverse impact on the environment.
Henry Engen
Community Development Director
Date Posted: MAKx W Z 1
Date Adopted:
CDD 11-&0
PC3/ 19 /91 MINUTES EXCERPT EXHIBIT C
Commissioner Waage referenced Program A-3 (land use distri s)
and asked what this program' s intent is.
Mr. DeCamp explained that the consultant' s concer was that
some policies contained in the current plan str ch some of
the residential areas into areas of the City at might be
more appropriately utilized for other uses. he consultants
are also concerned with the dwindling sup p of land that is
zoned for multi-family, and want the fi al implications of
the land use policies and land use ograms that the City
adopts to be carefully looked at. M . DeCamp added that both
the fiscal analysis and the earl ' r economic base analysis
(ERA) showed that there was prob ly a surplus of commercial
land when one considers buildo of the town and the residen-
tial capacities.
Commissioner Hanauer ex essed concern that in the consul-
tants ' discussions , t re did not appear to be mention of
finding a way to ann or rezone some industrial capabilities
for the City.
Commissioner H ' hland voiced his feeling that the consultants '
philosophy s that no matter what the zoning i,s, to
specifical look at the cost benefit ratio and make it a
• consider ion. Discussion continued.
Cha person Luna stated that what the consultants attempted to
do as suggest that the City not only consider the environmen-
al impacts and quality of life issues but to also take into
account the economic factors as well.
The motion carried 7:0.
Chairperson Luna declared a recess at 8 : 20 p.m. ; meeting
reconvened at 8 : 30 p.m.
3. Planned Development Overlay Zones - Amendment of PD7:
Review and discussion of the Planned Development Overlay
Zone No. 7 with direction by the Commission to identify
specific elements to be included within the PD7 develop-
ment standards for public hearing and referral to the
City Council.
Mr. DeCamp presented the staff report and a provided a back-
ground on the inception of the Planned Development Overlay
Zone No. 7. Fourteen possible development standards are being
proposed for adoption. He added that staff does not believe
that specifying a minimum lot size for the planned develop-
ments is a good idea, and referenced Commissioner Highland' s
• handout (Attachment A) reflecting information on a type of •
"defacto" minimum lot size which utilizes a bedroom count used
in determining density within multiple family zones.
PC3/ 19/91 MINUTES EXCERPT r
r
Commissioner Highland explained the reasoning behind the
information contained in the hand out. He expressed concern
with proposed development standard #1 noting that if adopted,
a majority of potential planned developments may be ruled out
by not meeting the exact one half acre minimum.
Mr. DeCamp pointed out that the planned development has to
take into consideration the building footprint as well as
driveways, parking areas , landscaping, and yard areas . As the
lots get smaller, it may be that the design options will be
more restricted. He added that larger lots allow more
flexibility in site design.
Chairperson Luna noted he could support #1 but added that
nowhere is the stipulation that the parent lot has to actually
front on a dedicated street, so it may be possible to have a
planned development on a flag lot. Discussion followed.
Commissioner Lochridge commented that flag lots need to be
addressed in planned developments whether they exist by
creation of a new lot or by the parent lot. There should be
some language to prevent creation of flag lots in planned
developments. Chairperson Luna concurred.
Commissioner Johnson referenced the General Plan, noting there •
is no language allowing lots less than one half acre.
Mr. DeCamp referenced Residential Policy Proposal #6 where the
second sentence of the Policy states that the City is allowed
to go below the one half acre minimum lot size in conjunction
with planned developments . Discussion and debate continued.
Commissioner Johnson spoke about lot coverage and the need for
elbow room which is one of the major goals in the General
Plan. He expressed concern that previous approvals for
planned developments have resulted in developments being
crammed so tight that there is no open space or room for
landscaping. He noted his objection to the size of planned
development lots.
Discussion also took place relative to the percentage of lot
coverage as it relates to structures, open space, etc.
Commissioner Highland added that the real key is not the lot
size itself but what percentage of that lot will be allowed to
be covered by the footprint of a house and garage. That
percentage will determine whether it will be financially
feasible to build, and if the house is going to be small
enough so that the price range may be more affordable.
• Commissioner Lochridge voiced his agreement with all of the •
standards, adding that if there is a minimum lot size,
projects will be designed to conform just to that minimum. He
further stated that he would rather that there be strong and
PC3/ 19/91 MINUTES EXCERPT
desirable standards and ask the applicants to be creative and
work with staff in developing projects the City can be proud
of.
Commissioner Lochridge also remarked that he would like to see
some standards developed to deal with flag lots.
Commissioner Lochridge stated he is pleased with the staff
report, noting his concern has been that the bulk of the house
when compared to the size of the lot was always too big. These
standards will provide a good ratio.
Commissioner Kudlac concurred, noting that what is important
to consider is what will work for the City as a whole. He
stated he is annoyed with the term "affordable housing" and
does not want to see this used as a reason for a planned
development.
Mr. DeCamp discussed the issue of affordable housing, noting
that it has never been staff' s intent to present a planned
development as affordable housing. He clarified that planned
developments are a more affordable and alternative housing
style. Discussion continued.
• - Public Testimony -
Turko Semmes, Toro Creek Road, applauded staff for beginning
to put together standards for PDs adding that it seems the
wheel is reinvented each time a PD is designed. He added that
it is important to keep the minimum lot size flexible. Mr.
Semmes voiced his feeling that #1 can be limiting in that many
lots are less than one half acre; and he offered comments on
other development standards.
Eric Michielssen recalled an experience he had with a planned
development (Woodglen) . It was subsequently denied so the
project was developed as condominiums. He added that it is
good to get these standards incorporated into the ordinance so
developers will know how to proceed and can design something
that will make sense. Mr. Michielssen emphasized the impor-
tance of cost factors in financing a condominium as opposed to
a PD (condo financing is more difficult for the buyer to
obtain) .
In response to query by Commissioner Kudlac, Mr. Michielssen
elaborated on the finance picture and market factors.
- End of Public Testimony -
Discussion ensued concerning the possibility of combining •
lots.
Mr.DeCamp commented that PDs can be favorable in the
amenities and benefits that accrue to the City. He added that
3/ 19/91 MINUTES EXCERPT �k
•
the financial and fiscal analysis previously discussed also
indicates that single family residential development through
PDs is a better deal for the City in terms of the fiscal
implications.
Mr. DeCamp advised that caution needs to be exercised to
ensure that adequate numbers of apartments will be available
in order to achieve a balanced housing market in the future.
If lots of any size are converted to PDs now that apartment
construction has slowed down coupled with condo conversions,
staff is concerned that the land base for rentals will erode
further. He added that the flexibility available in the
larger lots for PD design is not as necessary if one builds a
triplex, duplex, etc. as a multi-family project. Smaller lots
may be better suited to one or two structures providing
multiple units rather than the individual footprint of the
single family residence seen on PDs. Discussion continued.
Commissioner Highland expressed concern that government
frequently works from the concept that they control certain
things , but it is the financial institutions that do. He
added that the market controls far more than the City will
ever have a chance to. Mr. DeCamp indicated that the City' s
concern is that the housing policies contained in the General
Plan and Housing Element provide for a balanced market and
housing opportunities for different income levels, etc.
Commissioner Kudlac inquired if PDs are covered by CC&Rs. Mr.
DeCamp responded that CC&Rs are required to insure continued
maintenance of common open space areas , free access into
driveways, etc.
At this point, a consensus was taken for each of the proposed
development standards.
Commissioner Johnson suggested a change to #3 (setbacks) . Mr.
DeCamp explained the intent for recommending the proposed
setbacks in Standard #3 . He added that in small lot subdivi-
sions, it is encouraged that the house front on the street and
not have the garage predominating. Commissioner Johnson
stated his only objection would be uniformity throughout the
neighborhoods . Discussion continued.
Commissioner Kudlac stated that after hearing more discussion,
he would agree to Standard #1 . Commissioner Highland noted
his objection to #1.
With regard to the question of whether or not the parent lot
• fronts on a dedicated street, Mr. DeCamp stated he would be .
bring back some discussion on this when the ordinance is
considered at the public hearing.
With regard to water conservation measures , Mr. DeCamp noted
these could be incorporated as conditions. It may be
PC3/ 19,/91 MINUTES EXCERPT—
•
appropriate pp opriate to expand this matter and place them in the
standards. He discussed a possible requirement for greywater
systems for irrigation in conformance with the County Health
Department standards. Discussion ensued relative to making it
mandatory, costs involved with initial construction versus
retrofitting, drought situation versus landscaping require-
ments, etc.
As a final suggestion, Mr. DeCamp suggested that PD7 be
applied only in multi-family zones. The flexibility exists
for designing specific planned development overlays in resi-
dential zones or in special recreation zones (i.e. , Eagle
Creek) .
By direction of the Chair, given the consensus achieved on the
14 proposed development standards, staff will draft ordinance
language and bring it back to the Planning Commission for 'a
public hearing.
C. INDIVIDUAL CONT
1. Planning Commission
Commissioner Waage commented on the school distZnoted
crunch involving the cutback on bus services .
there is a Route-To-School program which be n several years
ago. He asked that the Planning Commissio send a message to
the Council that this would be a good ti , to continue work on
that program.
Chairperson Luna stated there are everal funds for which the
Planning Commission is responsib e, at least initially, (i.e. ,
the walk-to-school program d tree replacement fund) and
asked to see
some kind of temized accounting. Mr. Decamp
stated he would be happy o approach the Finance Director on
this matter.
Commissioner Johns said he never received a copy of the
11/20/90 minutes George Highland said he got a copy of them.
Mr. DeCamp sai a copy would be provided in his basket.
2. City anner
Mr. D amp stated this meeting was the second one under the
new ormat of separate advanced planning and current planning
m tings . He asked that the Commission give some thought to
ow they think its working and if they want to continue with
this format. He also suggested possibly meeting in the Club
• Room which provides a little more informal atmosphere for •
these types of "round table discussions.
I'
PC4/16/91 MINUTES EXCERPT EXHIBIT D
into open space whenever the opportunity aris so that the
environment and scenic enhancement can be pre rved. Ms. Moss
urged City acquisition for this property.
Ray Jansen, 6655 County Club Driv noted that value is
relative but future value is somet ' ng that goes up with time.
He voiced his feeling that as a public is made aware of
Stadium Park' s future and p ntial value, that this should
have an impact upon the o ers of the property.
- End of Public Test' ony -
MOTION: By Co ' ssioner Highland, seconded by Commissioner
Ku c and carried 7:0 to recommend to the City
uncil that any acquisition of Stadium Park by the
City of Atascadero for the purposes of maintaining
the property's natural state or to ensure that use
of the property is limited to parkland and/or low-
intensity recreation would be consistent with the
City's General Plan.
2. Zone Change 03-91:
Public hearing to consider the amendment of Section
9-3. 651 of the Atascadero Municipal Code (Zoning ordi-
nance) regarding development standards for projects to be
located within Planned Development Overlay Zone No. 7.
Steven DeCamp presented the staff report and provided a
background on the Commission' s previous discussion of
potential development standards to be imposed on PD7 projects.
With regard to Standard F, Mr. DeCamp suggested a possible
modification to provide for zero lot line setbacks, which
could be a design solution with some planned developments .
Commission questions and discussion followed.
Commissioner Hanauer stated that the zero lot line setback
should be taken advantage of. With regard to Standard N, he
inquired if this ratio was applied to previous planned
development approvals. Mr. DeCamp replied that most of the
developments reviewed have had a minimum rear setback of ten
feet and a minimum rear yard width of 30 feet so the 300
square foot ratio was met. He explained that this standard
will deliver the open space and tie the amount of open space
available to the number of residents anticipated within the
dwelling.
• Commissioner Kudlac questioned what effect the zero lot line •
would have on Standards F, L, and N. Mr. DeCamp explained
that the zero lot line allows a dwelling unit to be situated
right up to the side property line so the number of lots will
still be determined by the number of bedrooms proposed, and
will have the same density on the lot. Discussion followed
PC4/ 16/91 MINUTES EXCERPT
•
concerning the types of flexibility the zero lot line setback
would provide, how lot coverage would be affected, etc.
Commissioner Highland emphasized that the underlying zoning
will limit the density of a project and not the lot coverage.
Commissioner Lochridge observed that there was not a standard
to address curbs, gutters, and sidewalks. Mr. DeCamp re-
sponded that this matter will be considered on a case-by-case
basis, and added that it is important to look carefully at the
size of the project, its location and type of development
before applying a requirement for curbs, gutters, and side-
walks.
Commissioner Waage stated he would have problems with zero lot
lines in that if there is a common wall development, how would
this affect improvements to the dwelling (painting, etc. ) Mr.
DeCamp noted that zero lot line developments would more likely
occur by individual units being located either to the east or
west so that there will be a wider amount of open space
between the units. He added that there probably will not be
• many common wall developments.
Commissioner Lochridge stated that he could envision
advantages with zero lot lines; that developers could be
encouraged to build a variety of projects that would not be
similar to each other. He asked if there was another avenue
for providing this without incorporating it into the
standards.
Mr. DeCamp pointed out that the ordinance allows for planned
development overlays other than a PD7 (e.g. , Eagle Creek
development) ; however, developers will be encouraged to use
PD7s for projects in multi-family zones. He added that a
variance would be a vehicle for modifying development stan-
dards such as "F" ; however, a variance is something that
should be granted on a very limited basis due to the difficult
findings that are necessary. Mr. DeCamp further noted that
side yard setbacks could be a variable with the Planning
Commission having the ability to establish such a setback
based on the design and location of a project. Discussion
continued.
- Public Testimony -
David Montanaro, 9780 Las Lomas Avenue #5, expressed objection
• with several issues related to the proposed development •
standards . He stated that if a developer desires to build a
nicer project other than a typical condo, then he will have to
comply with these proposed standards which are more difficult
to work with. Mr. Montanaro added that the City will defeat
the purpose of supplying affordable housing to people in the
future and discussed the cost differences between planned
developments and condominiums. He provided a statement
-PC4/ 16/91 MINUTES EXCERPT
r
(Exhibit B) outlining his concerns with the development
standards.
In response to question by Chairperson Luna, Mr. Montanaro
explained that he is working on a project that could be
developed as a planned development under the current ordinance
as the property is less than one-half acre. He expressed
concern that the one-half acre minimum lot size will restrict
many pieces of land from otherwise being developed as planned
developments.
Continued dialogue took place with Mr. Montanaro and the
Planning Commission.
Commissioner Johnson commented that he did not recall the
Planning Commission considering planned unit developments as
"affordable" housing.
Whitey Thorpe, 8025 Santa Ynez , offered some comments on the
proposed ordinance and noted that it seems that each one of
the standards appears to preclude the full use of multi-family
housing standards; he recommended that the standards be made •
more reasonable.
Commissioner Highland commented that if some of the people
objecting to standards would look at what is required in
multi-family zoning, that most of the proposed standards for
planned unit developments are similarly required for building
apartment or condominium projects on the same property.
Deborah Hollowell with Cuesta Engineering stated she has
worked on planned unit developments with land both under and
over one-half acre (including combined lots) . She stated that
the acreage of the parent lot did not necessarily make the
larger project better or the smaller project worse. Ms.
Hollowell noted that the proposed standards seem to address
the issue of bulk and mass of the building and coverage which
were concerns at prior hearings on projects she has worked on.
Ms. Hollowell further stated that since the density issue is
covered in the underlying multi-family zoning, she wondered if
the one-half acre parent lot item is needed. If this standard
were removed, it might ease some of the concerns expressed by
Mr. Montanaro. She indicated favoring zero lot line and
common wall developments.
Ms. Hollowell suggested amendment to Standard L to reflect 45
• feet at the setback line which would give a lot the equivalent •
to a straight frontage lot which was 45 feet for its entire
width. Mr. Decamp explained that the intent of L should have
been worded so that the lot would have a frontage of 45 feet
and 40 feet on the cul-de-sac. Discussion continued.
PC4/ 16 /91 MINUTES EXCERPT
•
With regard to Standard M, Ms. Hollowell questioned why the
guest parking space is 10 ' by 20 ' instead of 9 ' by 18 ' . Ms.
Hollowell commented that the requirement for greywater
irrigation systems (Standard R) should be addressed as a
separate issue and should be dealt with on a City-wide basis.
Warren Miller, 5805 Cascabel, stated that a planned
development is a good answer to affordable housing that the
City should
take advantage of, but expressed concern that
Standard C will eliminate the affordable housing availability.
He noted that with the one-half acre minimum, approximately
4. 7 units would be able to be built and not six (using a 1600
square foot building area with 35% buildable area on a 1/2
acre lot) .
Commissioner Highland clarified that the underlying zoning for
a one-half acre lot in the multi-family zone will permit 6
units, and emphasized that there will be some lots in this
zone that are less than one-half acre and cannot be considered
for planned developments. Discussion followed.
Mr. Miller expressed concern that the proposed ordinance will
relegate all lots under 1/2 acre strictly to apartment or
condominium projects. He pointed out that he has purchased a
lot for a project which happens to be adjacent to Mr.
Montanaro' s proposed project, and both of these lots are under
1/2 acre.
Chairperson Luna suggested the possibility that Mr. Miller and
Mr. Montanaro could combine their lots.
Commissioner Highland commented that this particular issue
comes down to a philosophical difference in that planning
staff, in their viewpoint, feels that to design a planned unit
development on anything less than 1/2 acre is not adequate.
He emphasized that the purpose for conducting public hearings
is for the Commission to consider the testimony of individuals
and weigh that with what is proposed and determine what is
reasonable.
Debate and dialogue continued with Mr. Miller and the
Commission concerning the the proposed 1/2 acre parent lot
size with respect to the affordable housing issue.
Commissioner Waage stated that Mr. Miller could combine a lot
to make the minimum or could possibly combine Mr. Miller and
Mr. Montanaro ' s lot to design a planned development. Mr. •
Miller countered that this may solve their individual problem
but there are many lots in Atascadero that would like to be
developed and will not be able to. He asked the Commission to
give more thought to the 1/2 acre minimum.
Eric Greening noted that there appears to be a need for
ongoing dialogue between informed members of the building
PC4/ 16/91 MINUTES EXCERPT I�
•
community as to what is and what is not affordable and how
much certain standards would cost. He noted that there did
not appear to be a standard that addresses building orien-
tation in terms of the cardinal directions; that somehow the
standards need to recognize that the useable open space and
landscaping would benefit from not being completely shaded for
months at a time.
Mike Messer, 8833 Arcade Road, stated there are many lots in
Atascadero under 1/2 acre that are multi-family in which
apartments or condos can build on. He discussed financing and
other constraints involved with condo projects noting that
most prospective buyers prefer to own their own house and not
just air space. Mr. Messer stated that 1/4 acre would be a
good minimum lot size because the standards will design the
project and limit the number of units that can be built. He
emphasized that if the parent lot is restricted to 1/2 acre,
many planned development projects will be prohibited. In
concluding his remarks, Mr. Messer complimented Mr. DeCamp' s
report for addressing guidelines that will result in, good
projects.
Mr. Montanaro stated that with regard to combining his lot •
with Mr. Miller ' s , this could probably be accomplished. Both
he and Mr. Miller have each designed projects for planned
developments that would fit nicely with the existing zoning.
Mr. Montanaro added that this project would not work if the
lots are combined.
- End of Public Testimony -
Commissioner Johnson stated although he has heard from the
developers and real estate representatives, he would concur
with the standards as proposed, and pointed out that in the
past, the Planning Commission did not consider or acknowledge
planned developments as affordable housing units.
Commissioner Johnson offered the following revisions to the
standards :
Standard F - change to read 5 feet on both side yards or 10
feet on one side yard with zero lot line development.
Standard G - shall not exceed 35% of individual lot area.
Commissioner Highland suggested modification: not to exceed
35% of lot area of the created lot.
• Standard L - change to read frontage of each proposed lot
shall. . .
Standard R - to alleviate some of the concerns of using
greywater systems, Commissioner Johnson suggested inserting
the word approved greywater systems.
PC4/ 16 /91 MINUTES EXCERPT
•
Mr. DeCamp stated that with regard to "F" , he concurs with the
idea of having a variable side yard setback. If the side yard
setback is variable, designers would have more flexibility in
designing the lot. Commissioner Highland offered modified
wording to reflect a combined side yard setback of ten feet.
Commissioner Waage spoke in opposition to common wall
developments adding that this is not an ideal situation for
individual lots. Mr. DeCamp referenced the approved Biaginni
project which provided for common wall development with
modular homes. He voiced his feeling that he would not like
to see these types of projects precluded entirely. Discussion
followed.
With regard to "G" , it was suggested that the word frontage be
placed in front of "width" .
Mr. DeCamp explained the intent of "M" was to clarify that the
guest parking spot be placed in the driveway. He added that
this is a different type of parking arrangement than a typical
apartment or commercial development.
Mr. DeCamp noted there would not be a problem if the language
relative to greywater irrigations systems was deleted. The
purpose was to suggest a possible alternative means of keeping
the landscaping alive, etc. Discussion continued.
With regard to the 1/2 acre lot size, Mr. DeCamp commented
that this particular type of housing will not be suitable for
everyone - it will fill a particular "nitch" in the market
place but not to the exclusion of condominiums or apartments.
The City is attempting to provide a certain flexibility of
design that staff does not believe is possible on a lot that
is less than 1/2 acre. He further stated that the City needs
to provide a range of housing opportunities for Atascadero
that is going to include large lot single family development,
small lot single family development, as well as apartment and
condo development.
In response to query by Commissioner Kudlac concerning govern-
ment definition of affordable housing, Mr. DeCamp remarked
that this will vary depending upon the income of a particular
area within the State. Commissioner Kudlac cautioned not to
let developers use "affordable housing" as a tool as he has
seen some high price ranges for some of the planned develop-
ments that are currently being built. Mr. DeCamp clarified
• that these developments will be termed "more affordable" as •
opposed to $400, 000+ homes on large lots but it does not meet
the strict definition of low; moderate income housing or
affordable housing.
PC4/ 16/91 MINUTES EXCERPT
•
MOTION: By Commissioner Johnson and seconded by Commis-
sioner Hanauer and carried 7:0 to recommend to the
City Council to adopt the development standards for
PD7 with the following modifications:
Standard F: combined side yard setbacks of ten
feet.
Standard G: (1st sentence) - Building coverage
(residence plus garage footprint) shall
not exceed 35% of the individual lot
area.
Standard L: Each proposed lot shall have a minimum
frontage width of 45 feet, except that
lots at the end of a cul-de-sac may be
40 feet.
Standard M: (2nd sentence) - One guest parking
space of at least 10' X 20' shall be
provided on each individual lot.
Standard R: Eliminate . . .and, where practicable,
greywater irrigation systems.
The motion carried 7:0.
Commissioner Highland stated that although he voted for
the motion, he is opposed to Standard C.
C. INDIVIDUAL COMMENT
1. Planning Commission
Commissioner Hanauer reported on Rev. ynes ' recent attempt
to provide a drop-off point in fro of his church on San
Anselmo which had been red-curbed. e noted that the Traffic
Committee provided some relief; h ever, as of today, the curb
is still red.
In response to question by ommissioner Lochridge, Mr. DeCamp
replied that the Housi Element contains provisions for
affordable housing in e way of density bonuses, etc. State
law allows density b uses up to 25%, yet there are very few
examples of this pe of housing in Atascadero. Mr. DeCamp
further stated at density bonuses are a viable tool that
• exists within he current multi-family standards and would •
also apply ' th a planned development.
Commiss ' ner Hanauer referenced a condo project on Capistrano
that peared to be selling at a moderate price but did not do
wel Mr. DeCamp said that the site amenities and project
d ign were the controlling factors. Commissioner Hanauer
ATTACHMENT TO ITEM C-2
MEETING DATE: 5/28/91
City Council
City of Atascadero
May 5 1991
Subject: New P.U.D. Guidlines adopted by the Atascadero
Planning Commission.
I am opposed to the guidelines recently passed by the
planning commission.
1. Half Acre Minimum. The Planned Development concept allows
the most affordable housing available in the city today by
which an "Entry Level" buyer can own his own land and those
in retirement can have "Just a little bit and not too much" .
The Multi-Family zoned parcels, regardless of size, offer an
economically feasible development unit for the owner and for
the developer.
Commission Rational: "Allow flexibility and creativity in
site design"
• Site design can be handled nicely with Standard E. As far as
Creativity, it takes a lot more ingenuity and creativity to
design on smaller parcels with the result being a home that
is both attractive and affordable.
Allow Flexibility, Flexibility is another way of saying you
have plenty of room to move your structure around.
It seems to me the whole idea is to find a way to use what
has become very expensive land to its best advantage.
Seven to ten dollars per square foot is expensive residential
real estate. When you increase "Open Space" or as the
Planning commission states "provide a broader range of
amenities" , someone has to pay for these "extras" that are,
"highly desirable" but are unneeded and in many cases not
wanted.
First Time home buyers understand more than anyone that there
are "amenities" they can't afford when starting out. Is the
solution to create restrictions eliminating them from any
market or give them something to look forward to.
Design and development of a "Readily Marketable" planned
development on less than one half acre is difficult,
expensive and is a challenge to any developer who desires a
"Pride of Ownership" project. It makes better sense to
encourage creativity and provide some incentive to owners of
small multi-family zoned lots who pay the taxes on the
property and "Must" develop "Profitably" or not at all which
leaves weed growing vacant lots and unpaved streets.
I fail to see the logic of guidelines that restrict home
owners from owning the land under their home. This is the
principal difference between a P.D. and a Condo. With a lot
approximately 14000 square feet in size, four detached condo
units with garage parking for one car and additional onsite
parking for one car per unit can be accomplished creating
private rear yard space for each unit.
What advantage can a condo unit have over a P.D. The only
items missing are lot lines.
I would think it would be "Highly Desirable" to allow the
homeowner to improve his own "Open Space" as he desires in
hopes of making the property appreciate providing the
opportunity in the future to "Move Up" to a home with
additional open space and a two or three car garage.
There has to be a place to "Start" and a means to "Retire" in
home ownership.
Two cases in point. My son who was just married tried to
find an affordable house so that they could stay in the area
where the family is. They could have purchased a home as I
described above but one was not available other than a condo.
They wanted to own their land. They bought a small home on
their own land in Portland Ore.
My father who is almost ninty wanted to retire in Atascadero.
They could not afford acreage and did not want it. As he
said, "I don't want a big place with a lot of yard to keep up
and grass to mow, I've been through that and don't want any
more. We can do with a single car garage because we only have
one car and one driver.
He moved to Florida. If we're lucky, we see him about once a
year.
Standard H.
Limiting a structure to the upper floor having 75% of actual
lower floor living space will not eliminate "Bunker" style
structures. If this type of structure is unacceptable to the
planning commission, developers and architects will soon get
the message via Standard E. and will design accordingly.
Limiting an upper floor to 75% of ground floor habitable area
has the opposite net result the guidlines are directed
toward, "Open Space" . Again this not only eliminates smaller
lots from the PD but in effect puts homes on half acre and
over out of the market for "entry level" home buyers, by
requiring the use of more land for a smaller building.
The "Great American Dream" is still a possibility. When city
planners and developers begin to work together instead of
against each other it can become a reality.
Planning and development within cities must change as markets
change and the availability of land for homes disappears. We
must plan to use the right land for the right purpose and to
maximize its return. The days of half acre lawns, pools etc
for the entry level home buyer are gone. This has not been
caused by developers but by scarcity hence the high price of
buildable land.
People will continue to move to this community and pursue the
"Dream", if deprived of something affordable within the city,
they will head for the country causing subdivision of
additional farm land.
The home market that has been created in this community
unfortunately does not include its own residents!
How many kids do we know that have been raised, schooled and
have entered the job market locally and are the backbone of
our labor force, can afford to live here. The type of
buildable lots being created favors only the affluent from
outside the community.
One of the major tools used in home building is financing,
without it, building stops. The lending institutions that
finance home construction do not dictate to communities what
they can or can't build. They get their lending instructions
from the "market place" . If there are buyers for something,
banks generally will loan. If there is no "market" there will
be no loan.
At this time there is a strong market for "Entry Level"
priced single family homes made available by the planned
development. Financing is available because the buyers are
there.
Financing for condo development is as available as the
market, its not there!
Using these guides, eliminates the possibility of a PD on
property such as mine, eliminates ECONOMIC multi-family
development of any type and for all intent and purpose
results in residential single family use property with lots
of open space, zoned multi-family, which is, in some areas
adjacent to a shopping center or commercially zoned land.
I strongly recommend that the council ask the planning
commission to rework the proposed guidlines to provide
incentive for creative economic development rather than
restrictions that eliminate development entirely.
Si rely
Warren Miller
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF ATASCADERO Item No C-3
Through: Ray Windsor, City Manager Meeting 'Date: 5/28/91
File No:
Via: Henry Engen, Community Development Director
From: POSteven L. DeCamp, City Planner`
UB ECT:
Adoption of an urgency ordinance requiring conditional use permit
approval for 'certain previously "allowed" utility facilities to
be located within residential zones .
RECCBMNDATION
Adopt Ordinance No. 224 as an urgency measure. A four-fifths
(4/5) vote is required.
BACKGROUND:
Council has requested that action be initiated to increase local
regulation of certain utility facilities, includingcellular
telephone receiving/transmitting antennas.' This request followed
the installation of one such antenna which resulted in adverse
aesthetic impacts on an adjacent residential property.
ANALYBIS:
The City's Zoning Ordinance currently makes "utility transmission
facilities" allowed uses in residential zones. Increasing
densities and changing technology have coupled to increase the
potential for conflict between the desired "character" of
residential areas 'and` the "needs" of the utility companies. For
example, cellular telephone antennas were not anticipated by the
drafters of the City' s current zoning regulations.
Provision should be made .for the installation of major utility
facilities in residential ,zones . However, the increased scrutiny
allowed through the conditional use permit process will .allow for
improved "conditioning" of such projects toinsurecompatibility
with adjacent residential uses`.
The attached urgency ordinance will provide immediate safeguards
while a more indepth analysis of the situation is undertaken as
part of the overall Zoning Ordinance text amendment and update.
ATTACHMENTS: Draft Ordinance No. 224
ORDINANCE NO. 224
AN INTERIM ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ATASCADZRO' AMBNDING THZ ZONING ORDINANCE
BY REQUIRING CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS
FOR THE INSTALLATION OF CERTAIN PREVIOUSLY ALLOWED
UTILITY TRANSMISSION FACILITIES WITHIN RESIDENTIAL ZONES
(CITY COUNCIL INITIATED;)
WHEREAS, Section 65858 of the Government Code authorizes the
adoption by local legislative bodies of interim ordinances as
urgency measures to protect the public safety, health and
welfare; and
WHEREAS, said ordinances may be adopted as urgency measures
prohibiting actions which may be in conflict with a contemplated
zoning proposal which the 'legislative body, Planning Commission,
or Community Development Department is considering, or studying,
or intends to study within a reasonable time; and
WHEREAS, the City has undertaken aprogram to review, revise'
and update the City' s Zoning Ordinance text and map; and
WHEREAS, .the City' s Zoning Ordinance permits a wide variety
of uses within residential zones which could be deleterious to
the stated objectives of such zones; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on the
matter on May 28, ;1991; and
WHEREAS, such urgency measures` shall require a four-fifths
vote of the legislative body for adoption.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Atascadero
does ordain as follows:
Section 1 Council Finding.
1 . The proposed code amendment is in conformance with Section
65840 et 'seq of the California Government' Code concerning
zoning regulations.
2 . The proposed zoning ordinance text amendment is
categorically exempt from 'the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act .
3 . Further study is necessary to determine what, if any,
legislation is necessary and 'proper for the protection of
the public health, safety, and welfare.
4 . The proposed zoning ordinance text amendment designates uses'
• which are presently allowed to be uses which may be
permitted subject to a conditional use permit to ensure
z
• Ordinance No. 224
consistency with the residential goals of the General Plan.
5 . There is a current and immediate threat to the public
health, safety, or welfare, and approval of additional
building permits for the stated uses inconsistent with the
zoning ordinance text amendments provided for herein would
result in a threat to public health, safety, or welfare.
Section 2 . Zoning Ordinance Text Chancre.
1 . Section 9-3 . 701 (Land Use Descriptions) of the Zoning
Ordinance text is hereby amended as shown in the attached
Exhibit "A", which is hereby made a part of this ordinance
by reference .
2 . Section 9-3 . 143, Section 9-3 . 153, Section 9-3 . 163, and
Section 9-3 . 173 of the Zoning Ordinance text are hereby
amended as shown in the attached Exhibit "B", which is
hereby made a part of this ordinance by reference .
Section 3 .
This ordinance is adopted under Government Code Section
65858 and is full force and effect for forty-five days .
Section 4 .
The City Council hereby declares that this is an urgency
ordinance necessary to preserve the public peace, health and
safety due to the facts set forth above.
Section 5 .
This ordinance being an urgency ordinance for the immediate
protection of the public safety, health and general welfare,
containing a declaration of the facts constituting the urgency
and passed by a four-fifths (4/5) vote of the Council shall take
effect immediately upon its adoption.
Section 7 . Publication.
The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published
once within fifteen (15) days after its passage in the Atascadero
News, a newspaper of general circulation, printed, published and
circulated in tte City in accordance with Section 36933 of the
Government Code; shall certify the adopting and posting of this
ordinance, and shall cause this ordinance and this certification
together with proof of posting to be entered into the Book of
• Ordinances of this City.
•
Ordinance No. 224
On motion by , and seconded by
the foregoing ordinance is hereby adopted
in its entirety by the following roll call vote :
AYES :
NOES :
ABSENT:
DATE ADOPTED:
CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA
ROBERT LILLEY, MAYOR
ATTEST :
LEE DAYKA, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT :
RAY WINDSOR, City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ARTHUR MONTANDON, City Attorney
PREPARED BY:
HENRY ENGEN, Community Development
Director
5
• EXHIBIT A
Section 9-3 . 701 LAND USE DESCRIPTIONS
Utility Transmission Facilities :
Utility transmission lines and dis been r__-__t-__, including
=_L=t=Lion= poles and wires for electric, gas, other energy
settrees, gate-► cable television and telephone service. Does not
include lines serving individual customers .
Utility Facilities :
Includes utility facilities not included in "Utility Service
Centers" or "Utility Transmission Facilities" such as
substations, water tanks, antennas, satellite receiving or
transmitting dishes, or other facilities requiring or consisting
of above-ground structures .
•
Note :
fttik etet indicates text to be deleted.
Underline indicates text to be added.
EXHIBIT B
RS (Residential Suburban) Zone
9-3 . 143 . Conditional Uses :
(u) Utility facilities
RSF (Residential Single Family) Zone
9-3 . 153 . Conditional Uses :
(1)_ Utility facilities
LSF (Limited Single Family Residential) Zone
9-3 . 163 . Conditional Uses : •
W Utility facilities
RMF (Residential Multiple Family) Zone
9-3 . 173 . Conditional Uses :
,U) Utility facilities
Note :
Underline indicates text to be added
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL Meeting D
CITY OF ATASCADERO 8 ate: 5/28/91
Item No. : D-l _
Through: Ray Windsor, City Manager
From: Greg Luke Director of Public Works
SUBJECT': '
Request from County of San Luis Obispo for Dial-A-Ride service
to Templeton,
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that Council approve in concept the
extension of Dial-a-Ride service to Templeton. Final approval will
be reserved until all costs figures are produced.
DISCUSSIO
Please refer to the attached report from Dan Herron,
Transportation Planner with the San Luis Obispo Area Coordinating
Council, for a. summary of the actions to date.
FISCAL IMPACT:
All costs associated with the pilot program would be paid by
the County of San Luis Obispo.
03.17,'91 16:12 '$805 348 1074 SLO CNTY REPRO Z002,'002
San Luis Obispo Area. Coordinating Council Amyx Gmn
GrI
A!!:5��' "
and Re onat Trans ortation Planning Agency move
� p g � CY Poso Rob
Pismo Bec
Son Luis Olds
Son Luis ObispoCour
MBNO
To: Valerieey
�'ro:a: Dan Harron
Transportation Planner
Date: May 15, 1991
Regarding: Templeton transit seetingr May 9,; 1991
This memo is to summarize discussions to date on providing transit
service to the community of Templeton. I am confident some
mutually beneficial arrangement can be made to provide to new
access between Templeton and Atascadero.
on May 9th a meeting was held in Templeton to discuss whether the
County could pay Atascadero DAR to provide a diversion service,
picking up Templeton residents on regularly scheduled trips to Twin
Cities Hospital. The meeting included representatives from the
City of Atascadero, Community Transit Services, Area Council,
County Engineering staff and Harry, ovitt, County Supervisor.
Initial discussions were based on five hours of service daily from
Atascadaro; the impact this would have on your city was discussed.
Diversion of'scheduled runs, however, would have minimal impact and
would create an inec>me y o sca aro, to
defray any cost to the system. Harry ovitt stated he would support
this as a trial service, provided a fair formula be devised, and
would use contingency funds up to a cap of $10,000 ($20,000 if Paso
Robles likewise provides service) to fund this next fiscal year
(91/92) . Richard Randise, County Engineering, is to establish the
rate in conjunction with Valerie Humphrey and Roseanne Snyder,
while Dan Herron is to draft an inter;jurisdictional agreement to
cover mutual responsibilities. The target set for jurisdictional
review was the and of May. Target date for Atascadero service
initiation is July 1, 1991, provided the City and County approve
the agreement.
A question was raised as to the type of service to be provided, as
the proposal has elements of both fired route and door to door
service. Door-to-door diversion of the regularly scheduled Twin
Cities Hospital runs (3 time blocks daily) was seen as the most
cost effective operation: Fitting this service best was a two tier
approach to billing, with a fixed rate monthly Charge to handle the
administrative fee coupled to a charge per Templeton resident
riding the bus. 0
The next meeting of this group was tenatively scheduled May 29th.
r
County Government Center, San Luis Obisno. CA 9340A tsnhl I t;AO-AR11)
MEETING AGENDA
DAT 5/28 9I ITEM# D-2
MEMORANDUM
TO: Ray Windsor, City Manager
FROM: Greg Luke, Director of Public Works /2",
SUBJECTS Pavilion Change Order No 1
DATE: May 17, 1991
Attached is the first change orderfor the Lake Pavilion. The
change order deletes' various items described in Exhibit A 'for a
cost savings of $124,700. This change order is a result of our
efforts to find items that could be deleted which would not
significantly alter the original design concept,.
As we discussed, I would like the opportunity to give the
Council a status report on the Pavilion project at the next Council
meeting. I think a staff presentation would allow both the Council
and the public to know our progress and the , schedule of future
events.
ccs Andy Takata
CHANGE ORDER
sasxx E
-a====aa.sxaz=sxa�e=sxasx=xcsxx====s====�==sxa=s sas��c=x�xsx
Projec Atascadero Lake Pavilion Proje t No. 91-2
Date o Issuance: May 7, 1991
Contrac r Shetler Construction
You are rected to rake the following changes 'n the Contract
Documents.
e t
SEE ATTA ED EIIIBITS "A" A,VD "B".
Durvose of Chane Or:!er,
To reduce construction osis
'Attachments: (List currents sunportin change)
Change in Contract pr-, e: C nge in Contract Time:
Original Contract Price riginal Contract Time
$ 4 8.00 270 calendar days
Previous Change Orders Net change from previous
No. :to No. Change Orders
$ e none
days
Contract Pricy Prior to th ' s Contract Time Prior to this
Change Order Change Order
$ 1261 418.00 270 calendar days
Net Increase (decrease of Net ncrease (decrease) of
this Change Order this hange Order
$ (124,700.00) one days
Contract Price jai` all Contract ime with all
approved Change :0 dens approved C tinge Orders
$ 1 1369718.00 270 calenda days
saaxsssx-ssa3smx =x==- --
Recommended: Approved: Appr` ed-:
Johnby LL
Gri - staff Gr Lu-7e Contract
• Project anager Dir. of Public Works
"EXHIBIT A"
1. Delete all landscape and irrigation work from the project, including
any associated sleeves, imbeds, special grading, shrubs, turf and
any other vegetation, grading for landscape and irrigation require-
ments.
2. Delete all contract work as described on attachment labeled "EXHIBIT B",
EXCEPT the sign, as shown on sheet SE-7 of the contract drawings.
3. Substitute (replace) electric operated partition with a manual operated
partition (shown on sheet no. A-1 of the contract drawings) .
4. Substitute (replace) shingle roofing material (Cal-Shake) with GAF
Timberline Class A Asphalt Roof Shingle Package, 30 year warranty,
including Timbertex hip and ridge shingles.
•
0 •
1
� f♦
�-� ;�/ tiff 1 • t
• i �, is
f7 717
v. � `,lV TMJ � 1 • - �
7
i
f
•
* sign to remain a part of -,
contract
..: /
4
MrAMrAMW'00' �G
* Delete .all contract work this side of this line �A
• line unless directly associated (functional `- •
components) with the pavilion building.
"EXHIBIT B"
5/28/91 AGENDA ITEM D-2
*PLEASE REPLACE THIS PAGE WITH THAT
PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED WITH YOUR AGENDA
PACKET.
CHANGE ORDER
No.
=== ONE
Project: Atascadero Lake Pavilion Project No. 91-2
Date of Issuance: May 7, 1991
Contractor: Shetler Construction
You are directed to make the following changes in the Contract
Documents.
Description:
SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS "A" AND "B".
Purpose of Chance Order:
To reduce construction costs.
Attachments: (List documents supporting charge)
Change in Contract Price: Change in Contract Time:
Original Contract Price Original Contract Time
$_ 1.261.418.00 270 calendar days
Previous Change Orders Net change from previous
No. to No. Change Orders-
$ none none days
Contract Price Prior to this Contract Time Prior to this
Change Order Change Order
$ 1,261,418.00 270 calendar days
Net Increase (decrease) of Net Increase (decrease) of
this Change Order this Change Order
$ (122.800.00) none days
Contract Price with all Contract Time with all
approved Change Orders approved Change Orders
$ 1.138,618.00 270 calendar days
Recommended: Approved: Approved:
by (�
ohn Grindstaf Greg) Luxe Contractor
Project Manager Dir. of Public Storks
• REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item: D-3:;
Through: Ray Windsor, City Manager Meeting Date: 5/28/91
From: Kelly Heffernon,' Administrative Analyst
Vias Greg Luke, Public Works Director gv
SUBJECT: Status report on the Green Waste Recycling Program.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Extend the existing Green Waste Recycling Program from June to
September free of charge to Wil-Mar customers.
2. Share the cost of public education and advertising with Wil-
Mar on a 1: 1 basis.
BACKGROUND
On January 22, 1991 staff brought to your Council a proposal for an
Integrated Waste Management Program which included the recycling of
green waste. An outcome of that meeting was the approval of a
three month Green Waste Recycling Pilot Study which commenced April
1 1991. The purpose of the pilot program was in part to determine
the amount of participation from single family residences, and from
those figures determine the amount of waste that was ultimately
diverted from the landfill. Wil-Mar committed to implementing this
program as a free;service to its customers for a 'three month period
and is willing to extend the free service for another three months.
Although the pilot program has only been in place for less than two
months, direction is needed to appropriately plan for its next
phase.
DISCUSSION:
Given the infancy of the Green Waste Recycling Program, the amount
of data available for analysis is limited. The results contained
in this report should therefore be viewed very broadly.
A. Summary of 'Results
The participation rate in the first two weeks of the program
was consistently low with an average of 1580 pounds of green waste
collected per pick up. The program then experienced a surge of
• participation for the last half of April with an average of 3555 •
pounds per pick up. The momentum from the end of April has been
retained to date. Although only 9 out of 12 pick ups have been
y-
made for the month of May, more green waste has been recycled than
the entire month of April. Figures 1 and 2 are graphical summaries
of the amount of green waste recovered for both months.
Table 1 is a summary of results for the program so far. The
most critical figuresare the amount of residential green waste
diverted from the landfill in both months'. As indicated in the
table, 2.9% of the total residential solid waste was diverted for
the month of April as compared to 5. 1% in May. Based on the data
for April, the total amount of waste that could be diverted if
there was 100% residential participation is 16.8% It should be
noted that this figure is based on an estimate of .1200 participants
which is the number of households that signed up. It can be safely
assumed that not all who signed up are actually participating in
the program and therefore the 16.8% can be viewed as a conservative
estimate.
B. Results of Phone Survey
In an effort to assess the progress of the program and
opinions of those participating, a phone survey was conducted. A .
total of 100 households that had signed up for the program were
randomly selected and asked a few basic questions.
Of those who were contacted, a total of 77% have been
actively participating in the program. The reasons for not
participating varied from forgetting about it to being gone on
their pick up day to not having the appropriate receptacle. The
majority of those surveyed who are participating stated that they
are very satisfied with the program (45%) . In contrast, only 7%
indicated any amount of dissatisfaction (see Figure 3 for amore
detailed break down of answers) . Another question asked concerned
the level of convenience of the program. 55% stated that a once a
month pick up met their' needs while 18% asserted that an
alternative, such as providing a once a week drop off site, would
be more convenient (although most would only be willing to drive` 2
to 5 miles to drop off their green waste) .
Although the questions indicated above provided valuable
information in reviewing the program, it became prevalent that then
most important question asked was an open ended "do you have any
comments?". There were many echoing comments made - most of which
can be easily resolved by making simple modifications to the
program. The following is a summary of frequently stated concerns
and some easy solutions:
Issue: Resolution
a) *The 6 can limit is too *Eliminate the volume
restrictive'. requirement.
b) *The stickers do not adhere *Eliminate the sticker •
i well to the cans. requirement.
3
FIGURE 1
Amount of Green Waste Recycled in April
240
Inn
f ='0'= j {
4v. In
a
i �
ac� _ /VA' r/f
601 _
40
� �
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 114
DAYS
{ O:e ecuals ap�r�:�l�atal 23 los.
r
FIGURE 2
Amount of Green Waste Recycled in May
220 I
i 2001
i t7ll �
.60
20 �-
o00 f
00 f I
60 f /
�0
DAYS
i
t One unit equals approximately 23 lbs.
i
• TABLE 1•
SUMMARY OF RESULTS FROM THE GREEN WASTE PILOT PROGRAM
No. of Participants in the Program 1200. 0
* Proportion of Wil-Mar Subscribers 24 . 0%
* Proportion of Total Atascadero Households 17 . 2%
Results from the Month of April:
* Total tons of residential solid waste 451. 0
to the landfill
* Total tons of residential green waste 13 . 4
Collected
* Proportion of green waste diverted from 2 . 9%
landfill
Results to Date from the Month of May:
* Total tons of residential solid waste 138 . 2
to the landfill as of May 9th
* Total tons of residential green waste 7 . 5
collected as of May 9th
* Total tons of residential green waste collected 14 . 5
as of May 15th
* Proportion of green waste diverted from 5 . 1%
landfill
NOTE: Based on information available for the month of April,
the proportion of green waste diverted from the landfill assuming
100% residential participation is 16 .8%.
n
•
FIGURE 3
Level of Satisfaction
r
t
Bar: From: i2) To: (<1 Count: Percent: '
i
t i 2 45 145.4 -;"ode `
2 12 119 1119.192
3 13 i4 13 13.03
4 14 15 15.051
5 5 ;6 12 12.02
5 16 17 4 4.04
1 = Very Satisfied
2 = Somewhat Satisfied
3 = Neither Satisfied or Dissatisfied
4 = Somewhat Dissatisfied
5 = Very Dissatisfied
6 - Too Early to Tell
l
Issue: Resolution•
C) *Once a month is not frequent *Increase public
enough, especially in the awareness of existing
fall and spring. drop off sites (e.g.
Dirtman) .
*Provide weekly
monitored drop off
sites in the heavy
green waste seasons.
d) *It is impossible to separate *Weeds are allowed.
weeds from the green waste.
CONCLUSIONS•
Although the Green Waste Program has only been in place for
approximately two months, the results of the program so far are
encouraging. The amount of participation has been steadily
increasing in the program and it is likely to keep increasing once
the issues described above are addressed. Public education on
recycling in general and on this program specifically is necessary.
City staff and Wil-Mar have agreed to share any of the advertising
and educational costs for the program on a 1: 1 basis and the
Recycling Committee will be concentrating on community involvement
programs. It should be highlighted that most of the people
participating in the program are very happy with it and have
indicated to "keep up the good work" .
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL Agenda ' Itam: D-4
CITY OF ATASCADERO
Through : Ray Windsor, City Manager Meeting Date: 5/28/91
From: Mark Joseph , Administrative Services Directo' rr
SUBJECT:, ` Supplemental Support for County ' s Spay/Neuter ,Pro ram
RECOMMENDATION= Staff recommends against augmenting the current
level of $9,000 for Fiscal Year 1990-91 .
BACKGROUND:
During the 1990-91 budget process', the City budgeted $9,000
to allow the County to provide spay/neuter services. There were
concerns that $9,000 would be insufficient ( the amount - was
recommended by the County) . As Mr . Dollahite ' s letter of May 3,
1991 indicates, the $9,000 has in fact been disbursed and the
County is seeking an additional $3,000.
The basis for this request issurplusfunds from the 1989-90
Animal Control appropriation. Although itis true that the City
was not charged the full contract amount , the unused monies"
revert back to our General Fund Reserves.
It was staff ' s suggestion at the time to increase
spay/neuter funding if warranted . Unfortunately, the City ' s
financial picture has changed dramatically since last year . As a
result , even though the program is indeed a beneficial service,
staff cannot recommend a further reduction to the General Fund
Reserves this close to the end ,of th,e current fiscal year .
\spayneuter
country a/San C:"ui. ok$re
DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL REGULATION
ROBERT DOLLAHITE, DIRECTOR P.O. BOX 3760 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93403-37'
885 OKLAHOMA AVE. AC 805 548.4.
Ray Windsor, City Administrator 5/3/91.
City .of Atascadero �'
6500 Palma Ave CIT-y N1GR•
Atascadero, Ca '93422
Dear Mr. Windsor
The Department of Animal Regulation's Spay/Neuter assistance
program has been very successful this fiscal year. As a result of
that success your city's funds have run very low and will be
completely encumbered very soon.
At; the end of last fiscal year it was verbally agreed that the City
of Atascadero would transfer $3, 000 that had not been spent for the
1989-90 fiscal year for Animal Control Services into the 1990-91
Spay/Neuter program. We request that you authorize the transfer of
this money into the Spay/Neuter program.
If you have any questions, please contact me as soon as possible.
Sincerely,
Robert Dollahite
Director
RD:eo
cc: Robert Lei y, Mayor
Rollin Dexter, Councilman
Bonita Borgeson, Councilwoman
Alden Shiers, Councilman
Robert Nmmo, Councilman
MEETING AGENDA
DATE s/� ITEM# ,_.
M E M O R A N D U M
To: City Council
From: Mayor Bob Lilley
Subject: Proposed Chamber Sign Ordinance Revision
Date: May 28, 1991
Several 'weeks ago, during my absence from the Council meet-
ing, 'the ` Chamber' s proposed sign ordinance was referred to the
Downtown Sign Committee, with the understanding that the two 'stud-
ies could be reviewed and/or integrated into one recommendation
back to the full Council (see minute actionattached) .
I regret that I have not spoken up on this issue earlier, but
I felt it was important to complete the work of the Downtown Sign
Plan before bringing this matter to your attention. My concern is,
essentially, that any effort ' on the ,part of the Downtown '_Sign
Committee' to review, comment on and/or edit the proposed Chamber
sign ordinance prior to any public hearing testimony would likely
prejudice the votes of Councilman Dexter and myself in the sense`
that we could be accused of having already made up our minds on
various issues before the fact. And, even if this were not so, the
perception of such prejudging could certainly be leveled and, ob-
viously, I would want to avoid such a situation. Therefore, I
would like to ask 'that' Council reconsider its previous action and
make a motion to direct the 'Chamber's proposed sign ordinance to be
routed through' staff to the Planning Commission to begin the public
hearing process as recommended in one of the orginal staff options
(see Henry' s staff report attached) .
BL/RW:cw
Attachments: City Council Minute excerpt from 3/26/91
Report to City Council (3/26/91, Item #C-1)
CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF 3/26/91
MINUTES EXCERPT
Bill Mazzacane, Director of the Atascadero ` Chamber of Commerce, '
_ presented for City Council consideration a comprehensive rewrite of
the City' s Sign Ordinance. He gave an overview of the proposed
legislature emphasizing the significant amendments being suggested
by the Chamber's ;Sign Ordinance Committee.
Councilman Nimmo recognized the work of the Chamber' s committee and
voiced support for integrating recommendations from both this
committee and the Downtown Sign Committee.
Councilwoman Borgeson noted that she favored Staff Recommendation
#1, which would direct staff to compare the present ordinance to
the proposed ordinance presented by the Chamber.
There were no public comments
MOTION: By Councilwoman Borgeson to direct staff to prepare a
straight forward comparison of this document with the
existing ordinance for Planning Commission consideration.
Councilman Nmmo asked the Community Development Director for
a status report on the work of the Downtown Sign Committee.
Mr. Engen stated that the first and only meeting of this
committee had been to receive the: Chamber's draft.
Councilwoman Borgeson withdrew her motion agreeing with
Councilman N .mmo's suggestion that Council wait until the
City's committee has had an opportunity to go over the
Chamber's re-write and make its, own recommendations.
By commonconsensus, the matter was continued until the
efforts of both the Downtown Sign Committee and the Chamber
of
Commerce's Sign Committee have been integrated into one
document; which will be brought back to Council for their
review before referred to the `Planning commission for public
hearing.
WATER ISSUER
A. nformtational Mews
a. C rative Agreements with Water any
Councilwoman .Borges roposed tha ese matters be continued
until full, Council was sent -to a date after results of the
water study being conducts The Morro Group has been received.
Mr. Windsor noted that resu were, tentatively scheduled for
the second meetin ' April,
Councilwo orgeson urged that cooperatio 'th Atascadero Mutual
Water any be continued. The City Manage oncurred that it
CC3/26/91
Page 5
r�
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF ATASCADERO AGENDA ITEM: C-1
Through: Ray Windsor City Manager Mtg. Date: 3/26/91
From: Henry Engen, Community Dev. Dir. "C File No: Sign Ord.
SUBJECT:
Chamber of Commerce Draft Sign Ordinance.
BACKGROUND:
As indicated in the attached transmittal from the Atascadero
Chamber of Commerce Sign Ordinance Committee, that group has
prepared for City Council consideration, a 26 page comprehensive
rewrite of the City' s Sign Regulations.
They are proposing to present their product to the Council for
consideration as an initial step in the public review process with
a view to amending the City' s current ordinances.
ZONING AMENDMENT PROCEDURES:
The Zoning Ordinance provides that a text amendment may be initia-
ted by:
" (1) The City Council or Planning Commission on its own
motion; or
(2) The City Council or Planning Commission upon acceptance
of a request from any interested party, including the
Planning Director. Request(s) shall be in writing and
shall include a description of the benefit to be derived
as a result of the text amendment.
(i) The City Council may refer a proposed text
amendment to the Planning Director and/or Planning
Commission for response prior to deciding whether
to initiate the text amendment. "
ANALYSIS:
As the Chamber' s transmittal attests, this has been a major piece
of work for them and would represent a major special P j p project for •
staff. It would require revisions to the Zoning Ordinance,
Possibly to the Downtown Plan and zoning, possibly to the
Appearance Review Guidelines, and to the building code and imple-
menting fee resolutions. Hence, it would require Council approval
to bring the matter to the Planning Commission and, ultimately
through public hearings and back to the City Council for final
action.
ALTERNATIVES:
Based on the Zoning Ordinance' s procedures, the City Council could
direct any of the following:
1) Direct staff to prepare a straight forward comparison of this
document with the existing ordinance for Council consideration
before directing follow-up actions for a comprehensive
revision to the sign ordinance.
2) Direct staff to take the draft to the Planning Commission for
recommendation as to whether to initiate a text amendment.
3) Initiate consideration of a zoning text amendment by directing
staff to incorporate this work item in the FY 91-92 work
program, and prepare analyses for the Planning Commission
leading to public hearings and recommendation back to the City
Council.
HE:ps
cc: Bill Mazzacane, Atascadero Chamber of Commerce
Enclosure: March 19, 1991 Chamber of Commerce Transmittal: Draft
Sign Ordinance
•