The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda Packet 07/10/1990 # PUBLIC REVIEW COPY # PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE FROM COUNTER A G E N D A ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL CIL REGULAR MEETING ATASCADERO ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 6500 PALMA FOURTH FLOOR, ROTUNDA ROOM JULY 10, 1990 7 :00 P.M. This agenda is prepared and posted pursuant to the require- ments of Government Code Section 54954 . 2 . By listing a topic on this agenda, the City Council has expressed its intent to discuss and act on each item. In addition to any action identified in the brief general description of each item, the action that may be taken shall include: A referral to staff with specific requests for information; continuance; specific direction to staff con- cerning the policy or mission of the item; discontinuance of consideration; authorization to enter into negotiations and exe- cute agreements pertaining to the item; adoption or approval; and, disapproval . Copies of the staff reports or other documentation relating to each item of business referred to on the agenda are on file in the office of the City Clerk, available for public inspection during City Hallbusinesshours. The City Clerk will answer any questions regarding the agenda. RULES OF PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: Members of the audience may speak on any item on the agenda. A person may speak for five ( 5) minutes * No one may speak for a second time until everyone wishing to speak has had an opportunity to do so. No one may speak more than twice on any item. Council Members may question any speaker; the speaker may respond but, after the allotted time has expired, may not initiate further discussion. The floor will then be closed to public participation and open for Council discussion. Call to order Pledge of Allegiance Rohl Call City Council Comment COMMUNITY FORUM: The City Council values and encourages exchange of ideas and comments from you, the citizen. The Community Forum period is provided to receive comments from the public on matters other than scheduled agenda items . To increase the effectiveness of Community Forum, the following rules will be enforced: * A maximum of 30 minutes will be allowed for Community Forum, unless Council authorizes an extension. * All remarks shall be addressed to Council as a whole, and not to any individual member thereof . No person shall be permitted to make slanderous , profane or personal remarks against any Council Member, commissions & staff . A. CONSENT CALENDAR: All matters listed under Item A, Consent Calendar, are considered to be routine, and will be enacted by one motion in the form listed below. There will be no separate discussion on these items . A member of the Council or public may, by request, have any item removed from the Consent Calendar, which shall then be reviewed and acted upon separately after the adoption of the Consent Calendar. whereordinance adoption is involved, action by Council on the Con- sent Calendar will presuppose waiving of the reading in full of the ordinance in question. 1 . JUNE 12, 1990 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES (Cont' d from 6/26/90) 2 . JUNE 26 , 1990 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 3 . RESOLUTION NO. 89-90 —DESIGNATING "ARTIGA LANE" AS ROAD NAME TO SERVE' TRACT 1057 OFF OF BALBOA ROAD 4 . RESOLUTION NO. 94-90 - ADOPTING PROPOSITION 4 (GANN) SPENDING LIMIT FOR FY1990-91 5 . RESOLUTION NO. 93-90 ADOPTING ANNUAL APPROPRIATION FOR FY1990-91 6 . RESOLUTION NO. 95-90 - ADOPTING POSITION ALLOCATION FOR FY1990-91 7 . RESOLUTION NO. 96-90 - ADOPTING SALARIES FOR FY1990-91 S . ESTABLISHMENT OF VARIOUS STOP INTERSECTIONS: A. RESOLUTION NO. 77-90 - TRAFFIC WAY @ CITY YARD B. RESOLUTION NO. 78-90 - SAN ANDRES @ MARCHANT AVE . ' C. RESOLUTION NO. 79-90 - COROMAR AVE . @ MARCHANT AVE . D. RESOLUTION NO. 80-90 - SAN ANDRES @ ATASCADERO AVE . E. RESOLUTION NO. 81-90 _ MAGDELENA AVE. @ MERCEDES AVE. - ; F. RESOLUTION NO. 82-90 AMAPOA AVE . @ CURBARIL AVE . G. RESOLUTION NO. 83-90 - NAVAJOA @ SANTA YNEZ H. RESOLUTION NO. 84-90 - SERRA AVE. @ SAN ANDRES 2 9 . RESOLUTION NO. 90-90 - DESIGNATING NO PARKING ZONES ON EL CAMINO REAL ALONG A PORTION OF THE FRONTAGE OF ADOBE PLAZA 10. RESOLUTION NO. 91-90 CREATING A` NO PARKING ZONE, MODIFYING THE LEFT TURN LANE AND AUTHORIZINGCAUTIONARY PAINTING AT THE NEW POLICE STATION 11 . RESOLUTION NO. 88-90 DESIGNATING A STOP INTERSECTION FOR BOTH DIRECTIONS OF SAN ANSELMO AVE . @ MONTEREY RD. 12 . RESOLUTION NO. 67-90 ADOPTING SANITATION SERVICE CHARGES TO THE 1990-91 PROPERTY TAX' `BILL, 13 . RESOLUTION NO. 87-90< PLACING THE ANNUAL PAYMENT FOR ASSESS- MENT DISTRICT NO. 3 (MARCHANT WAY) ON THE PROPERTY TAXES FOR THE 1990-91 FISCAL YEAR 14 . RESOLUTION NO. 86-90 — PLACING THE ANNUAL PAYMENT FOR ASSESS- MENT DISTRICT NO., 4' (SEPERADO-CAYUCOS) ON THE PROPERTY TAXES FOR THE 1990-91 FISCAL YEAR 15 . RESOLUTION NO. 85-90 - PLACING THE ANNUAL PAYMENT FOR ASSESS- MENT DISTRICT NO. 5 (CHANDLER RANCH) ON THE PROPERTY TAXES FOR THE 1990-91 FISCAL YEAR 16 . RESOLUTION NO. 92-90 - AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN ,AGREE- MENT WITH R. BURKE CORPORATION TO CONSTRUCT THE SYCAMORE RD BRIDGE AT ATASCADERO CREEK 17 . RESOLUTION NO. 97-90 - APPROVING MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THECITYAND THE SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTL. UNION (GEN- ERAL SERVICES) FOR' FY1991-FY1993 18 . RESOLUTION NO. 98-90 - APPROVING MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE SERVICE EMPLOYEES- INTL.= UNION (CLER- ICAL) FOR FY1991-FY1993 B. HEARINGS/APPEARANCES: 1 TREE REMOVAL HEARING: A. INTERIM TREE REPLACEMENT STANDARDS ( See Item C-2 ) B. HERITAGE` TREE REMOVAL REQUEST - GARCIA ROAD EXTENSION (Cont' d from 6/26/90) 2 . RESOLUTION 68-90 - CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST TO ABANDON A PORTION OF THE COROMAR AVENUE RIGHT-OF-WAY AT 7350 COROMAR (Road Abandonment 1-90) (Charlesworth) 3 C. REGULAR BUSINESS : 1 . CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED FINDINGS FOR DENIAL FOR PROPOSED DIVISION OF PARCEL CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 3 .4 AC. INTO TWO LOTS CONTAINING 1 .1 AND 2 .3 ACRES AT 7503 CARMELITA (Bench) (Cont' d from 4/24 and 6/26/90) 2 . PROPOSAL FOR INTERIM TREE REPLACEMENT STANDARDS 3 . RECEIVE CITY COUNCIL' S TREE SUB-COMMITTEE' S DRAFT RE-WRITE OF THE TREE ORDINANCE FOR REFERRAL TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR HEARING AND RECOMMENDATION 4 . LETTER FROM FRIENDS OF THE PAVILION RE: FUNDRAISING ACTIVITIES 5 . COUNCIL COMMITTEES, COMMISSION AND BOARDS - YOUTH REPRESENTA- TIVES 6 . CREATION OF A DOWNTOWN TASK; FORCE TO IMPLEMENT THE MASTER PLAN D. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION: 1 . City Council: A. Committee Reports (The following represents ad hoc or standing committees . Informative status reports will be given, as felt necessary. ) : 1 . City/School Committee 2 . North Coastal Transit 3 . , S .L.O. Area Coordinating council 4 . Traffic Committee 5 . Solid/Hazardous Waste Mgmt. Committee 6 . Recycling Committee 7 . Economic Opportunity Commission 8 . B. I .A. 9 . Downtown Steering Committee 10. General Plan Subcommittee 2 . City Attorney 3 . City Clerk 4 . - City Treasurer 5 . City Manager * NOTICE: COUNCIL WILL ADJOURN TO 1 :30 P.M. ON WEDNESDAY, JULY 11TH, 4TH FLOOR, FOR A STUDY SESSION REGARDING ROAD STANDARDS. NOTE: STUDY SESSION DISCUSSION BY COUN- CIL IS SCHEDULED FOR 3 :00 P.M. FIELD OBSERVATION BY COUNCIL WILL OCCUR BETWEEN 1 :30 AND 3: 00 P.M. 4 MEETI 6X99 AGENDAA-1 C1R .. ..�........ 7/10190 ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL. MINUTES JUNE 12o 1994 Mayor Dexter called the meeting to 'order 'at ' "7:04 p.m. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilwoman Borgeson. ROLL _CALL: . Present: Councilmembers, Lilley, Borgeson., Shi rs and, Mayor Dexter Absent : Councilwoman Mackey Staff Present: Arther , Montandon, City Attorney; Henry Engen, Community Development , Director ; Andy Takata, Director of, Parks, Recreation & oo ;: Bud McHale, Police Chief; Gregory Luke, Public Works Director -, Gary Sims, Senior Civil engineer Marg Joseph, Administrative ServicesDirector; Mdke Hicks,, Police Chief; Lee Dayka, City Clerk 1 OUN��QMt#ENT'S Mayor. Dexter congratulated Councilwoman Borgeson on her' re- election to the City `Council Councilwoman Borgeson quoted a, newspaper article regarding new federal policy relating to trees and right-of-way. Councilman Shiers offered his congratulations to Councilwoman Borgeson and' Councilman-Elect Nimmo. Councilman Lilley, added his as well . , Mayor, Dexter acknowledged the new City Seal located on the "wall behind the Council seats and asked who the artist was that , completed the work . Mr . Takata indicated that the work wa`s` completed by Studio Design. PROCL OMAT I#SNS r Mayor Dexter read the following proclamations: "Honoring the 75th Anniversary of the Un;ited ,,States Naval CCo/_12!90` 1 -Reserve" . "Spec,ial .Olympics/Law CnforcemOnt Torch pun Day" as ,June 18, lagpC Mayor Dexter announced that he 'would again read; the` proclamation at City Hall on,the eighteenth of JJ; ne ,in a special ceremony. Mayov` ' 1eXter recbgnlzed CtsunizzImember-Elect' Nimmo and xtended congratulations.. Counzilwoman Borgesoh alto congk-atulated. Muriel ` Korba present , on her election`. tQ the tity 'Treasurer post .and to Lee Dayka for her e1ec tion :azCity Clef-k SPECIAL emgmieLm t Russell V. Miller , representing the } State I?�rpartmtartt of Conservation' s Mines and Geology, presented to Council results of a resource classification,- study, completed" in accordance with the surface_' Mining ,,end Reclamation act (SMARA) . Brief Council quest.ioris followed. A. �ENT CALENDAR 1. May, 8, 1990 CITY G�iC.IL r11NUTES '(Can' t fr00, 5/22,99)1 2. MAY 1+0, 1990 :CITY COUNCIL MINUTES (Spe41. Meetir�? 3. 'MAY 22 1990 CITY COUNCIL, M11M aTES 4. - TENTATIVE PARCEL,'.' MAP 20-89 14245, SANTA AN4,t RD. s 9800/9850? 'GARCERC RD — Stxbdi.viSion of tW'o ex oti.ry , lots containinb � 4 to:�*,A 'of' 17. 19 acr* intlb iov*' (2} . lots cetnta. ning` ppr ximately r G.'7 , acre' teach (Atescadero, High lands/Vo 1br echt Survsys} ` . 5. FINAL. TRACT MAP 2b-}89, '�krC�8-74 SANTA YSAH� rE?at'ing' ' ee r ''sidontial air,—space' d.ondomini;u ++ ;.(Nath ; common area (.Montanaro/North Coast- Engineering);. b. -CR'�i NANCE Ng,, ga -- . AUTHORI2I NG AN:.A"ENOHENT ,T'8' THit CONTRACT BETW . T� TASCADERO# c �r ti ori . BOARD° CfF AIS I 15 T I tit Ti E CAL.I FORN I A PUSS IC EMPLt}Y S` 'OETIREVIEW SYST9 (Second E ead i g & adoption) 7. AUTHORIZE UAL. ASSIESSM61 , RATE FO STREET 1' AIWENANCE DISTRICTS. A. .; —2, SON RA/RINAk rG6/1219p 2 E. RESOLUTION NO. 52-90 - 094-1 , SAN FERNANDO C. RESOLUTION -NO. 53-90 - #62-3. MALAZA D. e. --TNAL/:rcz-ARRA RE I QN- NO. 54-90 - #56-2, E. RESOLUTION NO. 55-90 - #63-1 , '"OBOE AVENUE F. RESOLUTION NQ. 56-90 - #96-1 , FALDA AV-::7NLj;-r G. RESOLUTION NO. 57-90 - #96-4, 6rl-AYUCOS AVENUE H. RESOLUTION NO. 5E-.E�0 - #86-2, AGUILA AVENUE S. RESOLUTION NO. 64-90 - ADOPTING THE SECOND AMENDMENT TO RESOLUTION NO. 56-819, THE ANNUAL APPROPRIATION RESOLUTION 9. RESOLUTION NO. 65-90 - AUTHORIZING CITY PARTICI PAT ILON IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF A PORTION OF OBISPO ROAD ($9,000) v{Jnr o m a n 0r �7 a R- that hat I t,em, tf 1 d 17 c r c:0, e T t i and ed furthen on he tv t Y. MOTION: !Ev o n d e e man 3e S aiendal- , vjith t�-e Sr,Zep * cns o" t z adept Conssnt ; items- #1 and im-c-Licon. C-31— lee , cor, ec t 7=1 MOTION: P v 0 u n lrna.n 1) a 9 t e-rt am e r. e t G r-g E-s,cj n t 0 cvs passed . MOTION: rl u r- ' -�m v C o Lj-,;c I w c)m.a n Scii-geson an' secs -Y cul c -1 1, e il-0 c z n t i n ie Mint t e s c f ay 2 . I 7 Q 0, to the !-?'.t E?2!-, 1 a)- M E g rio t 1 o-rj Una n.mou,S y a P;-cv-e d . _auric cc,-t i nj ed t-4 th d i--c t.;s s i 0 n oro i t Em #A-4, a ws 9. RESOLUTION NO. 65-90 - AUTHORIZING CITY PARTICIPATION IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF A PORTION OF OBISPO ROAD ($9,000) 7ouncilwoman Bergeson i t--=t it L-;Zias not - c-tllne tc rialve lla`,payei-s fund the deve] cprriert c, a p r 1 va-t e ?ad a:"-td th,.-t- this cn . a the r c-E,s o n she ad E-2 d f L !,Wll- Luke -ave bacl:,--roumd and staff rec"ort . He e,-.pla-in d thai 6/ 1 0, c fl-I D 0 m I a 0 L",I d E segmen' I s C, 0 n e n J f t,W E t E? 01 Z)E, 1-C.Lj g n �ne z c L;I 'd IT,a e E, s e e t V, tz v S V.item. ,.,unci I w C ma n. a e s c ri E? C lir a the leve a S r e ad 0 a et t-h e,t 1r ir Johnso, i wet -Lt e e LI L,.,j t h C:c n S t i-LI 0 M a road to 6CC&PT-_'_'_I I tLO the y street E'y-S 2 M he s h c u 1-7 be p n=- -_ c to u M E? tS S::�h e Obje--tet, ri d I r) the t I f o 1- 41-h e 4i rr,p c ve p r C: ,e a E_=L,I-at-- the r �ad ,,j C,U 1 d t E. a 'z e E? u n c: -I m a n S�piers s h a"is C; t S same statinc that the cost shcuid be I e Q- t i ritt a t e y born -, a y the developer . -01- Z)e>,+er that the comp I et i on of the road would enh.6nce c i rcu I at- ;.on. — ri q�j I-e U, a s t c h a t- F tms:-.,- the ra= made to the developer . III r . 55-Li I.:e reported t h a t the Mr . J o h rn=_c ri , s pr" .. nate road had been prevIotjs!Y approved with vi i d,t h Cf a i E?e ri t :I t_d -1-4 t e d n o zcmmi a -ment has thrr teen made Z, e c a I n,g owed r egard ing c t h e c o n t u c n d a I t- i 0 ri E I discuss-* c n JD p L, Ro a d c I-)i',c& ns . The e r ld e w a, 0 i� and safe`` I s D T-e__ 0)_ g aV e 5 1_eC D MM, 08 t i ens. -Q e -a ed, he� c pp o s t- cn to sjbsid z ng developer . Z�,L LJ f! 0,_j --ied a 0b ; spc Road a, criE of t h,e oi- - 4D. r, ads a r e -f c- t r-,e p e pie . He _cn)" r o a�j s a!-I d t a a 1 1. C,Ci c n y 1 a0ded th6t Z _ the malty does Inc;t a cc-ep t i t , it w i I I be c:o n cE i d e c:d a privately maintained -oad . Further d ; scussicn ensued . public C c m-t)E?n t : Puss Johnson, coiner of the Obispo Road property, stated that his or :-g i n a I intention w a s to lk,eep the 1-c&cd Private. He exPlalned that when he purchased the property, he deeded the right--f-way t-c t h E, C i ty, fir . Johnson indicated that he vss not a leve II c;p e r L - but a man with no other development go- Ing on i n the e C Ity He explained that he does riot have the additional VAI , 000 to enable him to bring the rc;ad up to +.-he mInIfflurl: standard tv,idth . "CI rPt-�-orney I�,Z)r a de-eim` nS4-" I' on C-F, .ri z n L 1 e y asked k e d t 1")e C-1 L , I 4- potential liability. F11 r . Mo nt and o n ed that he would _ - .`ez ate ti•:e WC'-f':stop e;:. a'-c+ a T-esponse. -- is m. .��0 �c-?S-'rt E : te:-cttt -he e '1E,C �` c S 1Gf '-!' a1-t y eS_ _ O u t " c�pec t tc ca = u c .cec, :c^Ce1- I r; it chTlS'�! d it 7 Ot-nscr: ,-elated ,.fiat another v'.c W.. e ceadY d✓5e Ci .fi aCi'"' 4 t, Ic a cont'.-a--tCr co s t s t - fo 11owed . v.=L. i1cman c._i _ ae,, stG r..ed 4na1as c4 ?a_r to hc _H '^ Mi- . .J orinEcr but, that .. t .,a= .::!-1LJ: S,- a_ _cw she moi :: -een toot roadway tc -emlalin- Mr . `u}:e stated that unique situations wIII a!- _se when dealing . th Lc lcl y cads and that,. the -".1 }'' (n Tl E_-,-1 ; c eC"1� ti_ . ._ o!-der to ti-.ng them i ,:to the . ty st -e=t _y_terr,. } -ed �y Tale �I Httcrr-1ey _'.-t}erJ-ecteld Ghat + e :r f' �'ra t vci5 acyi. ^(1' a.rgo t,y tile' L7eve1Or.n- ar-id deeded t.''., the C1 t y . that e, _n though the + T!av !-tet a z z e;D t t-he street " tits y: t -Rl a---.-I n t a i ne'd sys temp ?e i 3z t that tr'e C1 t C,i'J n t vcP!Pr ty ccl�, .. impose same . 1aci � _ � , o. .irnc „ r i-, d 41- a.� ., v'!a"-, t'mE'Ciy ., E' - a- - MOTION: p`; Counclman __ 1 ley arld Se`---n07Gt-'.. ay "' ?E >;' et t:J _ �� r d. F + c 1 ,, r.G., -�J. o m invent f� .. .a_ - i _ _ _ . _ .._ _ -F- ...i,-_ .... i tl�.ley _ de-y_Ei frli 1at1G!"!� he d ..v not 'vsnt tc �'ut tr"1 r �' : .: , ... s 1 t 11 C,i.l t a z d a i .. t `) :'. ,� "feel that It Irie e s P Ci i._..`� _ iit}' ^. .;he .r'y,e`. . :J j.:S=r to r rig ay ^" cu �p to �.ta�„�i'ar SStehti;j., rezed h, "act =that the cwi-S the p'-aper*} by 't%1r �e ot the deet . po, i1 call vote Leas .al, en on the me ticn. Nuc ticr? tc a d c,Pt Rescl.11icn 1 c _ -�( a"--ilrT-ict_ 1 ) P passed . Mr Mcntandon conmertted that Dt-culems can be avoided ,.1th (Ti Ot"e _1Cj}' . `Oltrc . i iUaS ri _ i'tC'�t ren--e cL ! i lL'.O;?:ar! Or'�eSQii tj'�E'SteU' ti'lat .n..:riarl` 1 .. aSY: I�iC ,.... ty` fianagei- .;O Set up study B, HEARINGS/APPEARANCES: 1 . ORDINANCE NO. 209 - AMENDING SECTIONS 2-13.02 AND 2-13.22 OR THE ATASCADERO MUNICIPAL CODE, REDUCING NUMBER OR PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSIONERS FROM SEVEN TO FIVE ; P rst �tCa� iiGi • �- aF:ata gave dacf ar�,ur, , ar;d -ecomrtel`.daticrn adopt -he c, ai - P_nze reducing the number c1-" commi-ss-io! er_ from sever, to 7✓ added trI -h . s a=I i cn was n t mea-t t10SCC_ czOe a,� or ^DeYtor repo, ted that rje had rece, ved a %r:G ?E' message ^rOm �CtrJoman ''iacl:eV, V.hc wa_ _ n 1=ur0pe. Indicat_ng her opposition the edU t iCt cun`i lworr,ar, Eo -geson agreec i.i t stat ; stating That thea. i I n o w wc'_i•:s a1-cc v0i__f-HC apprec _atiOn. for t n e I r wo'k .ounci 'Iiman cEn ler4 zon—_urred that, he saw no p;-otJ" lefr T:,^ the red Eked =. z 0f the commission recogni _-_ng the fact that commission-related items ;would be well advertised in the newspaper . L J'u'nci lmar i',o ted he araC I-i ad n 1-Cb1ems :vi t1 the staff 'tcommendat _on- MOTION. ry Co unci lm,am L1 11_ Bey and seconded by Courici 1fioala n c -g'cSo- to ✓Ya i.`c, the rea`.'ing in full -•rid iretrC?duce u7' n a n c e `Vo . _.nQ t3y t ' tie on-1 y; passed 4 MOTION: B' Cc.unz171 :am L: _ ley and cecC;`ided by roul'c _^Var! S` vers tC, aP.prove Jr'marce No I? on first read, n,g ; ,T:ot_on unanimous Ca'-.- ie by r 01 cal ! vote. C. REGULAR BUSINESS: 1 . RESOLUTION NO. 66-90 - AUTHORIZING THE 7EPARTIMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS TO BID THE SYCAMORE ROAD BRILEGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT �.-e'g Luke C!aV� _La`f repot• t ecorr:men-ding the ad0pt_C1-t df Resc?ution !"Jo . be-90 which would authorize tt-,e Department of Public works to b'LC` the Sycamore Sridge Replacement Project and au thor i z the C i 1,v !"Tanager tc h i re a State prroved br i dge _nspector ar•ld e>:ecute additional agreements as -eauired by the State . Mr . Luke gave credit to Cary Sims , Senior Civil Engineer for accomplishments in obtaining 90 funding for this important project . Council questions followed regarding staffing and the hiring of a qualified inspector . !!r . -ui;e reported that the City is obligated to hire an e:;per ienced bridge cons,t;-action insreztor to oversee the dal y construction activity and recomrlemded john from Bakers e:d for the colntract vasation. h;ere L.,c_. r?o pub is CCtrt(TI ent . MOTION: Z vutiL Vol rTla r: nc Gid b L, _ � �.& RECY CL S NG L„O^9t"�s ;T-t VACANCIES !'.' � ..tel "C' •� Z, _. ,.mer `!-Om, Renee __ _F;e` t 3r Ro1rR,1a!"t J; le ^.?C` _ .nQ L.,C(TIM lce e Vdr;i ::n re=ommer;oed the zipolntmnem" c*. e c -ya %'a'v'is arid- !-:eoE'C:=a ._ _ :e; ..... the !-Recycling ,..C^1;Y1iti„eE. �C.J;;nC_ ,manC'. s:lt..ia1 4: .eG `IimsC . om -,he d _ =--uss on and stepped dowr.. ...ouncilwomar; Bergeson, stated that the applicant , �edecca ' C_4;a,.s iGt old eno:.t-^'1 for arr;c int.rclent ar.,.._ sL;bm. t;,ect:-1E lame Cr ._ay J n 9 e n for onside!-at Ion .._..ono vii h `Je`.=o;^a^ Davi S. ;.;a, D ,tOr "ec o.^_,n z =t:l r iti.%tes `i,^ tr?E' omm,. t teeC . ,;aT, E'1_Nr S r o ZeC �"!c t the Y�CC _ _ ny �U:T!lt11 t 'ee 0ot�!'iiYlE"."', C`J- r4-ic3.t u?_ i v ;_ a.pr,}. art tJn er!C.c;u? iI1e and er s . Ub 1Z "oMmet f t ?� I l' - - - t, - Ct ct ed en.c'o' ,agement y. :u� . e c, �G , C. ,% `r�asurer-�.! e v . .., � z The EJ tv E ..Q, E: i-eper _ed "^ . __s eG aPP- _c�Dt _0;� . , .ad r,ct ee; . ESCE. E,.:i V ` . E' ,erk C7fi. e as Par of the- forma" e C r,_ timent'. Pr cce=s . ebecca Lilley, a p p I Dant , spoke in _ ';,'Port of �:er 3f.,PC�i '. . ;T.t?;':t d c :.31" ;fled ! oW t !Vas she reLeived and tui-neo 4r1 `Ic'- app l .cat lot,. MOTION: By Councilwoman Borgeson to no lrlate Debor--ah, Davis and Par. Tarsen for tijO-yea}_ terms t:0 the RecyCl ing Cummi 'tee . Tree Cit; ..: erk indicated that Pts. Davl a4ppIicat_czn �-.ad also not been !-ec.i ed by tete formai dead? ine f o r submittal . PIs . Bcrgeson withdrev.- `:er Motion. Discussion fol coved . � � n R[,b,ecca L. _ .r'. au.�.-=��=sed '`he Cour, . . o nee more n� :C - t , g t h a .. t`':e cmm: t'Ll ee s 'ccmmendations reflected Par, t .CiPatior. and ,, . ol :err;_nt in i- e Miss !. ley aSked that _ .: line . MOTION: _.Cun _ . rrao:T:am Scroesor• and se_onded by -_0 u nZ i _main 7^ ler_ nominate veorQe _ _ -C' an c?., 7a'.nsen ..'c.-vear te-mT_- to the Re-y-1 - ng ,..,L1 R1R:i „tee ano 1nv.. + ..ncQ t. .e c:the ap _ _cants to Join t`te ZL)mm i ttee as vu>. , : ary •n.!em t E? mctiorn pa_sad 3:tJ 3. MAYORS 8 CJUNCILMEMBERS EXE-UTaVE FORUM T QULY 15-20, 1990 en repo.-ted t,hF_t t h i S wa=_ an inTormationa1 Item on, V ar]C �pt:ncil' man-E1ezt Nimmo :on{it"mod his attentance. 4 . CONFIRM DATES FOR COUNCIL BUDGET HEARINGS Verba at cs� t! ± c the bud et were to be -t _p in zat.ed to �Cpies Q 4_ wtri.cutei o the ._._ v, e and st:a4 apprct{y , mate .' mune 14 and n`wr nevi tF-,o f., j }..^.,t^... "' -a.-es for Su Cite, "ear nos r 't �G n C _ 1 =or,,4 t"med the dates . M' Joseph ind_cated that an a, C 4- .0na1 S Er'.aI C: 'nCi1 meeting 'or the purpo=e Cr adoptin-, tu`i et was t'e :at : ✓e1 , _,eV fOr 7 C)0 p ,m. D. IND 1VID SAL JE T ERMINATIONlND/QR AZT.1QN t 1 . C>ty Council : A. Committee Reports The tc:i d� DF- .- (Ilse d y„� „-"�" CN:l rl C? s _trC ng SSL-ie iZ) J ,y. '-I E? `. Jj 1-'t sc inc1 zE�t ed wri a: - d r'ep: &^_.ita 1 V vJi .. _ �E .-tEE ed be r p.,' _ ar;..)U 1 i-ItEu 1 rer ace �.CUi-1� t 1n!C(ii:,i"1 iac k,ey of� the'. cCf!1.M,: t'o 6.. Recycling Commitee — No report . . E onomic Opportunity CommissJ.on Ma,, Gcr Dextci_ a rtil0unL ed a special ?lee t i n; of the EJa! d . S. Finance Committee - No report . �. Business Improvement Association - `'vo !-EIport . 10. Downtown Steering Committee — No report . 11 . Interim Growth Management Committee — No report . 12. General. Plan Subcommittee — Pio report: . 2. City Attorney — No -epos ., . 3. City Clerk - No report . 4. Ci t Treasurer - No i-epor t: . 5. ti t "'tanager — .'"�o 6. Fire Chief — Chie-; P-ck=_ gave a statue repos „ on a haZardcus :raterial incident at the Li y ' S sewer treatment plant and adti i-ed that; t -te wi 1 i be updated as the THE MEETING WAS ADJOURNED AT 9: 15 P.M. TO THE FIRST SESSION Or THE BUDGET HEARINGS ON MONDAY, JUNE 25, 1990 AT 3:00 R.M. IN THE CLUB ROOM. M IVU REC j DED AND (PREPARED BY: 0A) LEE DAYKA., City Clerk - ...fit AGENDA,..i l��yfE� 1�ryW/y��() j *, NOTE; THEMIWJM FROM M co} mcn I oriNG of ,gym`26TH WILL ,BE T IMMM° 'AT A I ATER TIME. t f ' 1 MME NG AGE"DA DATE-_7j JQL2Q tTW I .A- RESOLUTION NO. 89`-98 RESOLUTION OF THE ATASCADERO `CITY COUNCIL DESIGNATING" l A STREET NAME (ARTIGA LANE) TO SERVE TRACT "10S7 O OF BAI BOA "ROAD (`DOVICA TRACT) , WHEREAS, Government Cade Section, 34091.1 establishes authority for cities to designate or. change the name of city streets; ano WHEREAS, on ;Tune 5, 1990, the Planning Commission conducted a -public hearing on `the matter of designating Artiga Lane as a "road name to serve lots 3, `,4, 5, and S of 'Tract 10S7and WHEREAS, Public Works and the- Fire Department had requestrid that this road be given a new name to facilitate, emergencyz .and public access; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on June : 2E, 1990 to` consider this matter. NOW, THSRRFbRE, the Atascadero 'City Council does resolve, declare, determine and order as follows- Section 1. The City ,Council ;finds that the granting -of the request . will contribute to an orderly system .for street naming. section 2. The City: Council of the City of Atascadero hereby approves the request and establishes the .street name of Artiga" Lane as indicated in attached Exhibit A,` Section 3. The City Clerk is directed to transmit a certified copy" of this resolution to the Board of supervisors of San Luis Obispo C®unty. On motion. by Councilperson and seconded by Councilperson- , ,.t a foregoina resolution is hereby 'adapted in its ent rety ,on t e following roll call. `Vote. .AYES; NOR§: r ABSENT DATE. ADOPTED: Page Two Resolution No. 89-90 8y: C3,1IFT LTLL 'Y', May c>r ATTEST; City cif' Ata r,44*fro, Coil i£ IEEEI?A , MeMi APPROVED AS TC °CONTENT s - Y WrNDSORI ZIEV, 'Manager . APPROVED AS .TO rCiRM y orner i PREPARED BY4. i 3 KRUIRE - IwwRwilYgxw�yM Community I „ olopm Di G for 1 f A 4 f 1 1 S I r � � c r 1 � � e f L CL i tl1t � { e ilrZi W.- airs tat` \Y t1: •tt N V 1 � � i � – � W Vit`, i� � 2 �2}d � � a• a i :; / b i� . � 12 -• '� :;;I ;'� `�`.` . � � 1'110. - —. IN 14 tx Y _ _ � Y nor ,- ��•..; �'Ij� r ------ • i * o o i� Jt J / . 1 1tEFORT TO CITY CE UNC i L CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda It*M% A-4 Through: stay Windsor , City Manager ' , MeetingDate« t7 10/94 From: Mark Joseph, Administrative Services Director Adoption of FY 90-91 Proposition 4 Spending limit. RECOf"�"IENDAT I OR!s ,, Staff" recommendsCouncil ' adopt the attached ' resolution establishing the FY 90--91 Spending Limi.t'. (Resolution No., 94�9t1) Each year Council must adopt a spending limit. ,This limit_ is calculated by multiply ng the adjusted base year ammunt , times a _ combination of population growth and a change in . 'the Consumer Price Index (CPI ) For rY; 90-9,1 this represents a `7.51 percent increase over the adjusted base of s4 ,9?6,463, or a ,new spending ' limit`_of $5,350,491 . Since our revenue sources subject tca the limit are only $5, 152,130, the margin -of safety is ' s1981,361 . Revenues , subject to the l imi t are primarily from proceeds .of taxes, state subvention monies, and . any investment , e,arnings.- Fees, licenses, permits and fines areexcluded I froT the"" limit. Accondingly,_ it is not uncommon for a City' s tonal budget- to be in excess of the spending limit, and still be in compliance. With passage of Proposition 111 in June., 1990, significant revisions were made regarding how the Ginn Limit shall be calculated. We expect the result will 'be to' increase the spending limit. ~As staff receives more 'information regarding how to/ cailculsate the changes, ;we .will report back. to ,Council.. The attached table shows the calculations determining- the' cur,reht Proposition 4 Spending limit. The table below itemizIes ,thoo e revenues subject -to the, limit : r Revenues SUbject .to2 Proposition, Fc�ur Spending l:imi91 ' 0 RCVENt3E SQURCE '7 11NT Property Taxes Sales Tax 1 OZOS 0,00 . Occupancy' Tax 13t), Property Transfer Tax Misce'llaheouslOther 230 Motor Vehicle 1n-+-Lieu Taxes' il 0,0,4000 Cigarette, ;Tax 15- 000 r Homee►wner 'ls Rel ie Miscellaneous In" Lieu 'T :xes ie;400 Investrtter7t arnii�gs` , 194,000 Tat l $5 vt� 13a f \ 1 4^ 1 k 1 k J t \`r l CITY OF ATASCADERO PROPOSITION 41 CALCULATIONS JUNE, 1990 CPI POP. PROP 4 APPROP. YEAR CHANGE CHANGE FACTOR LIMIT AMOUNT DIFFERENCE (BASE 1980-81 YEAR>* 2,353,499 1981-82 9. 12 1 .89 11 . 18 2,616,620 1 ,855,528 761 ,092 1982-83 6.79 4.92 12.04 2,931 ,661 2,026,597 905,064 1963-84 2.35 2.91 5.33 3,087 ,919 2,076,816 1 ,011 , 103 1084-85 4 .74 2.88 7.76 3,327,542 2,449, 352 878, 190 1985-86 3.74 3.46 7. 33 3,571 ,451 2,749,970 8215481 1986-87 2. 30 6.27 8.71 3,862,524 3,435,787 446,737 1987-88 3.04 4.86 8.53 4,213,703 3,744 ,425 450,642 1988-89 3.93 6. 17 11 . 15 4,683,531 4 ,302,703 326, 134 1989-90 4.98 2.41 7.73 5,045,568 4 ,536,400 440,063 1990-91 3.84 3.54 7.75 5,436,600 5, 152, 130 198,361 * Normal base year was 1978-79. Atascadero ' s first full year of operation was 1980-81 hence this became our base year . \newprop4 1 Effective for all California Cities July 1 , 1980. RESOLUTION NO. 94-90 RESOLUTION OF THE ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL SETTING AN APPROPRIATION LIMIT FOR THE FISCAL PERIOD JULY 1 , 1990 THROUGH JUNE 30, 1991 . WHEREAS, Section 7900 of the Government Code, as added by Chapter 200 of the Statutes of 1980, Division 9, provides for the effective and efficient implementation of ARticle XIIIB of the California Constitution; and WHEREAS, Section 7901 and 7913 of Chapter 1205, provides that each year the governing body of each local jurisdiction shall , by resolution, establish its appropriations limit at a regularly scheduled meeting ; and WHEREAS, the base year appropriation limit for Fiscal year 1980-81 has been recalculated , as set forth in Resolution Number 47-88; and WHEREAS, any judicial action or challenge shall only be commenced within 45 days of the effective date of this resolution. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Atascadero City Council does hereby set the appropriations limit for the fiscal period July 1 , 1990 through June 30, 1991 as $5, 350,491 . Documentation used in determination of the appropriations limit is available to the public in the office of the Administrative Services Director , Administration Building , 6500 Palma Ave. , Room 208, Atascadero , CA. On motion by and seconded by the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote: AYES: P40ES: ABSENT: DATE ADOPTED: BY: ROLLIN DEXTER, MAYOR City of Atascadero ATTEST: is LEE DAYKA, CITY CLERK REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Itf Through: Ray Windsor , City Manager Meeting Date: 7/10/90 From: Mark Joseph , Administrative Services Director/rrk-- SUBJECT: Adopting the FY 90-91 Annual Appropriation Resolution 93-90. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Council adopt Resolution 93-90 establishing appropriation limits by Fund and Department for fiscal year 1990-91 . BACKGROUND: The Recommended Budget for FY 90-91 has already been distributed to Council and reviewed in a number of public hearings. The attached resolution adopts "bottom line" amounts for each Department . The Recommended Budget contains detailed information for each of the Departments. The modifications as a result of the public hearings are outlined below. *An additional $15,000 for Liability Insurance The actual premium was supplied to staff after the recommended budget was completed . *An additional $12,653 for Community Agencies This is the General Fund portion; an extra 68,248 is in the Tree Planting Trust for tree plantings in the BIA area. A complete list of approved Community Agency funding requests is attached to this report . *The Aquatics Program is included in the General Fund Originally, a separate fund was proposed . For simplicity ' s sake, the program is included in the General Fund . Accordingly, revenues have been increased by $25,200 and appropriations by $24,665, leaving a net gain of $535. *Minor appropriations have been carried over from last year to the next , when those costs were not expended as expected . *In the Gas Tax Fund , an additional $65,000 was included in the Street Improvement Program. Accordina to the League of California Cities, this is the extra revenue Atascadero can 0 expect because of the increased Gas Tax . *An extra $20,000 has been appropriated to the Administration Building Fund . This is for engineering work related to the Unreinforced Masonry Structures Program, as discussed in the Council hearings. *A General Fund reserve of $35,000 has been established for the Library Expansion. Although unappropriated it will nonetheless be included in the net fund balance. res9390 1990-91 AGENCY REQUESTS AMOUNT AMOUNT NAME OF AGENCY REQUESTED APPROVED 1 . ACTION FOR ANIMAL ' S RIGHTS $1 ,500. $1 ,500. 2. AD-CARE ASSOC. 1 ,575. 500. 3. AMERICAN RED CROSS 1 ,500. 250. 4 . ARTPARK - AAUW 750. 750. 5. ATASCADERO BABE RUTH 10,000. 5,000. 6. ATASCADERO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 22,000. 22,000. 7. ATASCADERO COMMUNITY BAND 5,000. 5,000 . 8. ATASCADERO LITTLE LEAGUE 6,000. 9,600.* 9. ATASCADERO YOUTH FOOTBALL 10,000. 5,000. 0 0. BIA 15,748. 15,748. 11 . BRONZE TIGER PROJECT 1 ,000. 1 ,000. 12 . CAL POLY ARTS 250. 250. 13. CARING CALLERS 175. 175. 14 . CHUMASH COUNCIL OF CAMPFIRE 1 ,000. 500. 15. CRIME STOPPERS 500. 500. 16. EASTER SEAL SOCIETY 500. 250. 17. ECONOMIC OPPORTUNIT`! COMMISSION 1 ,628. 1 ,628. (Sr . Health Screening ) 18. FAMILY SERVICES CENTER 1 ,000. 500. 19. FOOD BANK COALITION 2,000. 1 ,000. 20. HOSPICE OF SLO COUNTY 1 ,000. 500. 21 . HOTLINE OF SLO COUNTY 700. 500. ort. MOZART FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION 250. 250. 23. NORTH COUNTY CYCLING CLUB 2 ,000. 1 ,000. 24 . NO. COUNTY WOMEN' S SHELTER 20,000 . 10,000. 1990-91 AGENCY REQUESTS AMOUNT AMOUNT NAME OF AGENCY REQUESTED APPROVED 25. OMBUDSMAN SERVICE OF SLO $ 500. $ 300. 26. R.S.V.P. 500. 500. 27. SAN LUIS OBISPO CO. VISITORS 3,800 . 3,800. 28. SAN LUIS COUNTY YOUTH SYMPHONY 500. 250. 29. SLO GOLD COAST CHORUS 850. -0- 30. SENIOR CITIZENS UNITED 2,400. 2,400. 31 . SENIOR NUTRITION PROGRAM 750. 500. 32. FRIENDS OF THE LIBRARY 35,000. # �33. GIRLS SOFTBALL LEAGUE 161 ,500. -0- GRAND TOTALS 311 ,876. 91 , 151 . *Includes $4,600 of carryover money from FY 89-90. **Although nothing was appropriated , the $35,000 is a reserve on the General Fund . 0 Exhibit I ANNUAL APPROPRIATIONS BY FUND, BY DEPARTMENT, FOR FISCAL YEAR 1990-91 DEPARTMENT NAME AMOUNT GENERAL FUND 110 - City Council 40,785 120 - City Clerk 47,500 130 - City Treasurer 3,765 140 - City Attorney 65,000 150 - City Manager 129, 175 200 - Police 2,053 , 140 300 - Fire 1 , 146 ,770 410 - Public Works Administration/Engineering 367,480 500 - Community Development 773,410 605 - Parks, Recreation & Zoo - Administration 53,985 610 - Recreation 344,305 611 - Aquatics 24,665 620 - Parks 344,005 640 - Building Maintenance 200,525 660 - Streets Maintenance 460,565 710 - Personnel 114,625 720 - Finance 2741400 740 - Risk Management 307,300 820 - Non-Department 450,293 Subtotal - Fund 1 7,201 ,693 GAS TAX FUND 621 - St . Maintenance/Gas Tax 93,500 900 - Capital Improvements 390.000 Subtotal - Fund 2 483,500 ZOO OPERATIONS FUND 630 - Zoo Operations 222 ,500 DIAL-A-RIDE FUND 450 - Dial-A-Ride Operations 291 ,655 WASTEWATER OPERATIONS 430 - Wastewater Operations 801 ,585 PARKS CONCESSIONS ENTERPRISE 621 - Park Concessions 48,609 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 765 - Equipment Replacement 179 , 100 TREE PLANTING TRUST 1301 - Tree Planting 21 , 158 DEPARTMENT NAME AMOUNT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT #3 1403 - Debt Service 6,420 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT #4 1404 - Debt Service 161 ,590 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT #5 1405 - Debt Service 54,006 81 REVENUE BONDS - WASTEWATER 1405 - Debt Service 123,000 89 C.O.P. - POLICE FACILITY/PAVILION 1452 - Debt Service 396,300 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL 900 - Capital Improvements 176,000 89 C.O.P. - CONSTRUCTION FUND 900 - Capital Improvements 411 ,900 FIRE IMPACT FEE FUND 900 - Capital Improvements 479000 PARKS IMPACT FEE FUND 900 - Capital Improvements 65,900 ZOO CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 900 - Capital Improvements 30,000 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE FUND 900 - Capital Improvements 140,000 BRIDGE IMPACT FEE FUND 900 - Capital Improvements 360,000 STREET MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS 622 - Street Maintenance Districts 70,500 LTF/NON-TRANSIT CAPITAL 900 - Capital Improvements 459, 150 BUILDING/GROUNDS/EQUIPMENT IMPACT 900 - Capital Improvements 55,050 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT/ENGINEERING IMPACT 900 - Capital Improvements 31 ,000 ADMINISTRATION BUILDING RENOVATION 900 - Capital Improvements 143,000 GRAND TOTAL 11 ,980,616. RESOLUTION NO. 93-90 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIT`! OF ATASCADERO APPROVING A BUDGET FOR THE 1990-91 FISCAL YEAR AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS THEREOF BE IT RESOLVED by the Atascadero City Council as follows: Section 1 : Pursuant to provisions of the Government Code, a budget is hereby approved , per attached entitled "Annual Appropriations by Fund , by Department" , and as may be amended by City Council for the City of Atascadero for Fiscal Year 1990-91 . Section 2: The City Manager may transfer appropriations within, but not between, each of the departmental activities, as required to achieve the orderly and efficient functioning of the City . Section 3 : The Council , from time to time, by motion, may approve additional appropriations, as they/ deem necessary. On motion by Councilperson and seconded by Councilperson , the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ADOPTED: REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item: A-6 Through: Ray Windsor, City Manager Meeting Date: 7/10/90 From: Mark Joseph, Administrative Services Director �/V- V / SUBJECT: Adopting FY 90-91 Position Allocation Resolution 95-90 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Council approve Resolution 95- 90, adopting the Position Allocation Resolution for fiscal year 1990-91 . BACKGROUND• Each year as part of adopting the Annual Budget , the number of positions allocated by Department and job description is established by Council action. The attached resolution shows the number of authorized positions as of July 1 , 1990 and January 1 , 1991 . The two columns is to accommodate the fact that the Planning Technician position in Community Development is recommended to become effective on January 1 . res95-90 0 RESOLUTION NO. 95-90 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO ADOPTING A POSITION ALLOCATION SCHEDULE FOR THE CITY OF ATASCADERO NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Council of the City of Atascadero does hereby ratify: Section 1 . Position Allocation Schedule. The schedule of positions allocated by Department and Job Classification shall be as set forth in Exhibit I , attached to this resolution and made a part of this resolution. Section 2. Effective Date. The effective date of this resolution shall be July 1 , 1990. Section 3. Amendments. Amendments changing either the job classification or the number of positions shall be by Council resolution. On motion by Councilperson and seconded by Councilperson the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: DATE: ATTEST: LEE DAYK,A, City Clerk ROBERT LILLEY , Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: ARTHER MONTANDON RAY WINDSOR City Attorney City Manager 0 CITY OF ATASCADERO PERMANENT POSITIONS ALLOCATED FOR FISCAL YEAR 1990-91 CITY CLERK 7-1-90 1-1-91 Deouty City Clerk 1 .0 1 .0 Department Total 1 .0 1 .0 CITY MANAGER City Manager 1 .0 1 .0 Secretary to the City Manager 1 .0 1 .0 Department Total 2.0 2.0 POLICE DEPARTMENT Chief of Police 1 .0 1 .0 Police Lieutenant 2.0 2 .0 Police Sergeant 4 .0 4 .0 Police Agent 5 .0 S .0 Police Officer 16.0 16.0 Support Services Manager 1 .0 1 .0 Support Services Lead Technician 1 .0 1 .0 Support Services Technician 7.5 7.5 Department Total 37.5 37.5 FIRE DEPARTMENT Fire Chief 1 .0 1 .0 Battalion Chief 2.0 2.0 Fire Captain* 4.0 4.0 Fire Engineer* 4.0 4.0 Firefighter* 5.0 5 .0 Administrative Secretary 1 .0 1 .0 Office Assistant I 0.5 0.5 Department Total 17.5 17.5 *Up to six positions may be designated Paramedics PUBLIC WORKS Director of Public Works/City Engineer 1 .0 1 .0 Senior Civil Engineer 1 .0 1 .0 Associate Civil Engineer 1 .0 1 .0 Engineering Technician II 1 .0 1 .0 Engineering Technician I 1 .0 1 .0 Administrative Secretary 1 .0 1 .0 Office Assistant I 0.5 0.5 Superintendent of Public Works 1 .0 1 .0 Natural Resources Specialist 1 .0 1 .0 Wastewater Operations Supervisor 1 .0 1 .0, Wastewater Treatment Ooerator II 1 .0 1 .0 PUBLIC WORKS (CONTINUED) 7-1-90 1-1-91 Wastewater Treatment Operator I 2.0 2 .0 Wastewater Treatment Operator- In-Training 1 .0 1 .0 Department Total 13.5 13.5 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Director of Community Development 1 .0 1 .0 City Planner 1 .0 1 .0 Senior Planner 1 .0 1 .0 Assistant Planner 2.0 2.0 Planning Technician 0.0 1 .0 Building Official 1 .0 1 .0 Plan Check Engineer 1 .0 1 .0 Compliance Officer 1 .0 1 .0 Building Inspector Il 2.0 2.0 Administrative Secretary 1 .6 1 .6 Building Aide 1 .0 1 .0 Office Assistant II 1 .0 1 .0 Department Total 13.6 14.6 PARKS, RECREATION AND ZOO Director of Parks , Recreation & Zoo 1 .0 1 .0 Assistant Parks, Recreation & Zoo Director 1 .0 1 .0 Recreation Supervisor 2.0 2.0 Administrative Secretary 1 .0 1 .0 Office Assistant I 1 .0 1 .0 Park a k Supervisor 1 .0 1 .0 Maintenance Leadworker 1 .0 1 .0 Maintenance Worker II 8.0 8.0 Maintenance Worker I 5.0 5.0 Street Maintenance Supervisor 1 .0 1 .0 Building Maintenance Specialist 1 .0 1 .0 Department Total 23.0 23.0 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Director of Administrative Services 1 .0 1 .0 Assistant Finance Director 1 .0 1 .0 Administrative Secretary 1 .0 1 .0 Finance Technician 1 .0 1 .0 Account Clerk II 1 .0 1 .0 Account Clerk I 1 .0 1 .0 Personnel Coordinator 1 .0 1 .0 Department Total 7.0 7.0 TOTAL FULL-TIME PERMANENT POSITIONS 115. 1 116. 1 per=_90-91 REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item: A-7 Through: Ray Windsor, City Manager Meeting Date: 7/10/90 From: Mark Joseph, Administrative Services Director ! SUBJECT: Adopting FY 90-91 Salary Resolution 96-90 . RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Council approve Resolution 96- 90 adopting the Salary Resolution for fiscal year 1990-91 . BACKGROUND: The attached resolution contains the salaries for all authorized classifications in the City effective July 1 , 1990. For the most part , the salaries have been established by the meet-and-confer process with Bargaining Units. Management ,an Mid- Management f' g d Confidential Employees g lo �ees show no change in salaries because meetings are still taking place. It is expected that this salary resolution will be amended to reflect the new rates within the next two Council sessions. The attached resolution includes new salaries for the SEIU bargaining units (General and Clerical ) , based on the MOU ' s anticipated to be adopted at today ' s session. res96-90 RESOLUTION NO. 96-90 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO ADOPTING A SCHEDULE OF SALARIES FOR ALL JOB CLASSIFICATIONS WITHIN THE CITY OF ATASCADERG NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Council of the City of Atascadero does hereby ratify: Section 1 . Classifications Added. The following job classifications are hereby added : Associate Civil Engineer Natural Resources Specialist Planning Technician Section Z. Salary Schedule. The monthly salaries_ of all authorized job classifications shall be as set forth in Exhibit I , which shall be made a part of this resolution; Section 3. Effective Date. The effective date of this resolution shall be July 1 , 1990. On motion by Councilperson and seconded by Councilperson the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: DATE: ATTEST: LEE DAYKA, City Clerk ROBERT LILLEY , Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: ARTHER MONTANDON, City Attorney RAY WINDSOR, City Manager -- 1mTm o -- - - m�i,� -- -iL 1 L Ic o 0 O O c 0 0 ` 0 0 O O OC C m" M o t O C . ^ •+ O-0 •++ � m'M r r 0 Kt r m w 1 00-000 00 00 00 o0 0r No IC 00 C oN 1' 10:.q r.1Ir. IM rl .+m IC 4t 10 CO C- . c� i tD ~ -oma Oto Irrh Mr rw V)4T ., '0 'co ' ., br• OM MO m%a oo t,w�mlro, I om PP Mrh r- r- w rtnc� rP r-6, w •0 Pr raw 'Or QM rN rclncr w 1 PN rr c MP mm ir in F4 a) d 7N v .i.+ a MQ .•+N a �cr mN Ir Mo, Ci_4 M'0 O � h 4T 44 rr Mr4r, NCJ MM NN Mr4 MMr• M.N'r NMr,N.N:r rt C%4 r- Ca'•+ NNr rlN NNC i L 1 MM0 IT IT 0 m0qr -o tr PO te NI.+c OrJ v rM car-4 -c -T ir rM t -t h*)a Plhr mO W { rM .+ .� MN �r .ahs Nm .+'0 10 10 Po Mo or .,r 'O it) 1- 1 . • . . . . , . . (P1 .+"M r r N of v, r m r o m c .{h p mc cia o'r v N m v m a O. r I rM MM •'•ih mr-j N Nrh h') r mP P0' r 'O Mr '0N '0 •,a rr AI Hm N v'C F- 0 r, M .ar 00 T, •1M c 0 P, rN Ic rr1 re Nm •1C c MM PO 1 MNr NN te MM r•IN v MN r MMr• m(N0 NMr NNC r. NC• C'Jw.C NNr NN Nr• 11 0 0 r PrC Or41 NM V or C .1MO � CD 10 rP r`r7 mh7 r-t- rC 14 w 1 IT 4T mm mm MD rr rm rm M V If r-N r0 q M N T Om MPC m0 En 1 0 m V 0'0 L 0,:CD te 0 r a o .+: '0 m C r o C r r ^0 P h 00-1 o,-t P •.i C *0 In 1 'm± O I :"NPC OO v v CO wm r rPN OM j mr rm Ph7 a Nin p to 41 NP a h7 h7 U i O '0 0 '0 '0C N0' C NOrC No< m m ON 0 PP Mw U 100C• wr OP .; M me. M N C N N M:N CJ rl M Ca.: NNC M N fJ C• N N r .1 N r N;.1 N. N N L I mr4 f- r- MM rM ON MN P '0h ro O.d rMh in Do M '0 Pm Nr r• 1 oo. '0 '0 wM '0O MM rmr rM '0N '00 Pp s V) O'm '0m -T 11, to tr I *a q, Nr4 Mo No CJN " Poh rP r-) 4T mgn P •+ mN -o, Mme+ mi- w 1 r`0 m m P r m Cl. 10 m M'0 0 10 N P C 'O m: O •0 N r 'o M In m 10 h7 i- S1 1 mh7 rr 0r" rra OP rr m .1 mm ra0 '0P 010 Pm ON rm NN NN MN NN Mw NCJr NN .ir4 r4 C4 .+.+ C• C4.4- .1w Ca CJ or nh7 r.1" h")m mN m'0 C• m '0 r '0 .iN V w .0v 010- 0, N . . .-i 2 W 1 '0h�Crr rvc rP ro, PM OP 0.0 mr N'0 m0'r 'ONte m rJr z m 1 D r rr rm T '0r ` a) o, mr Np mu) ` Mrr wN ` rN to -T CD O 1 Mr '0 '0 v '0m ,,i bp ON NNh Or in a) M'0 MO'h '0 h7 nt- m '0 L Q I I- I- MM P'0 M •'+ Pm '0 '0 r0 m '0 .4Pr Nm 0,10 00 r- Pwh 'er i NNC• NNr• NN NNC r—I NNr NN .+ NC N.+ .+•.+ r .+.t,' .1..0 ++ N •.•i•.1 1 O i OO CO OC' 00 OO CO OC o0 oo' OC OC o0 o`C CO 00' o 'O .1 .-t rrw0. .1p C• r1.1 .1 ..i NN .1w .4w .4r In .1r 0.1 .a.In .1O N-4 •t h7 i S r- O Q : O X 1rp Y p 1 - S U.. P n N U 0 +0' +0 w L m ' I IQ QI A 0,1 fi G u A . W -� .H > . a X U O i 0 -i0 tU T'1 O >- 41 U N PJ t M U 'O t# r. N P I O N A O -' !_ - 8J U 0 �6 Q� a - Q1 - n U m L 1 - S 1•I H r. \ i N@1 N - Ua u r. a. r, -� U ' U m0 W 0 O0 d •1 1 u > Z - O - U - Q� D - t- J 3 L 0 S. L �c > \ i ♦mi - v- U .2S - 4- 0 > rN ` P � > Q! O � L• + u O0 _ - r I > N r- - U ii '!. 3 N y .r. m1 t• L •- Q1+• o' Qt m a +° i. t!' +,. tJ L •- 4- N L' D 3. Q� N v C N •- m +• 'p t: C U�U F- O +p '0 -� 10 W w I b d s Q� s r N tU X a - 0. -�1 v- to r . ;_•_ C•- L t:: O ' 3 S. U > J i CL N U ._ •- G." •1- +- iT 4-' -j— L _ O 0 n 0+ ro m L ' T N tP•- IU IU- +- H M I s L +0 A • C 0 N 1- 4• r m z :. - m4 C G C + a n + N UU _ + - A m A - Q t - U L m4 N - - '09, OO L - . U H 1 N t: U 414- U U 't7 V-' :. N U tU' 0 Ga L O � + O � +-+• � d 7 L w 1 s.- - mU o o - Qt o x •- a, a if v a - . :: C >- IL 0- 0 -- - 01 W I !- E mm NN -+ u 0 aa: ut- s_ a Ntr -W +eu t- I- u L O 1 A O O - N 'm N N 0 C m R 0 W 04 s. Z N - .• 7 0 +0 1p U, 33 u'0 w i a 4 EL LL C:<+10 C oaU zmi dm Ntn mom mL km UW Zz LLtr 33 QQ 11 I w I c O .+n M r6 p'O 0 c 00 C CO C CO c NN C 00 OO ^00OO In6 OO -.4 JV C w .1 A t w.i ww ww .1w a) CD 0r- wN .+•+ .•1r .1'0 w.•1 .1NC NCJC M .4 .1.1 .4 .q O 1 w w w -. M to N r1 N r 0 •1 r 0' V) C, •+ M r, r P M m h In 0 PI m M r+.1 M N M M .1 M U i NMC NNC• NN K MMr NN 0 MN f, NNC MM NN P r r, r♦O V OM '0+0 Min Ic '0 '0 In rrr � 1- { L" U: trl: z E zz Lzx zz z I x il WU I :t(n a mmu MEOUtom cr, roto =D Z I z1: x ZZ 1: r- X L UL W LU' U U OU L' U' U U 0 0U U 1 OO 00 14w .i .+ .•1w .1 .1 .i.1 .1 .1 .1wN NM IT v nnvwn �novoolc '0 'D Ic Ne CL 1 1 w I QN mN 0, 0 N 1 P NQ W t N ., It �. 1 C N.e MNC N-H (t I L in Ir `OOC w I +, o OD o + - fn 1 In tt: 0] 0 •0 t QO LCL MLO a i N ° c circ .°� I ' moi o� enc °a cnIicN �� a) No °;'� HI L t` m NP a)6, N fl) i a V) V* d M V) X0 03 Lm Q I �.�..4 nNC CD Pe � 1 >- t F,. lil 1 fL L O0 UNC O :O Z 07 1 11 M in11 L) Q 07 O, O : 1 a in Ol C L7 Cr L7 D. Q I OD•M.iL NNC ..4'A CP t O 1 C O O O O O . . tt i 0u O I m U \ i U 1.4 of ) W W i i� in 0 ON Im 0 ch H ., -j I aQ rnQ ; fl U H I u L U u L 0 0 w I LL a a ¢ W i Li O t0i iL OL 07.[n 1 w C m o o a .Na m U I Q 'T L NN NN �{ I OO fnA QQ i REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item: A-5 Through : Ray Windsor , City Manager Meeting Date: 7/10/90 From: Mark Joseph , Administrative Services Director�ll SUBJECT: Adopting the FY 90-91 Annual Appropriation Resolution 93-90. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Council adopt Resolution 93-90 establishing appropriation limits by Fund and Department for fiscal year 1990-91 . BACKGROUND• The Recommended Budget for FY 90-91 has already been distributed to Council and reviewed in a number of public hearings. The attached resolution adopts "bottom line" amounts for each Department . The Recommended Budget contains detailed information for each of the Departments. The modifications as a result of the public hearings are outlined below. *An additional $15,000 for Liability Insurance The actual premium was supplied to staff after the recommended budget was completed . *An additional $12,653 for Community Agencies This is the General Fund portion; an extra 68,248 is in the Tree Planting Trust for tree plantings in the BIA area. A complete list of approved Community Agency funding requests is attached to this report . *The Aquatics Program is included in the General Fund Originally, a separate fund was proposed . For simplicity ' s sake, the program is included in the General Fund . Accordingly, revenues have been increased by $25,200 and appropriations by $24,665, leaving a net gain of $535. *Minor appropriations have been carried over from last year to the next , when those costs were not expended as expected . *In the Gas Tax Fund , an additional $65,000 was included in the Street Improvement Program. According to the League of . California Cities , this is the extra revenue Atascadero can expect because of the increased Gas Tax . *An extra $20,000 has been appropriated to the Administration Building Fund . This is for engineering work related to the Unreinforced Masonry Structures Program, as discussed in the Council hearings. *A General Fund reserve of $35,000 has been established for the Library Expansion. Although unappropriated it will nonetheless be included in the net fund balance. res9390 1990-91 AGENCY REQUESTS AMOUNT AMOUNT NAME OF AGENCY REQUESTED APPROVED 1 . ACTION FOR ANIMAL 'S RIGHTS $1 ,500. $1 ,500. 2. AD-CARE ASSOC. 1 ,575. 500. 3. AMERICAN RED CROSS 1 ,500. 250. 4 . ARTPARK - AAUW 750. 750. 5. ATASCADERO BABE RUTH 10,000. 5,000. 6. ATASCADERO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 22,000. 22,000. 7. ATASCADERO COMMUNITY BAND 5,000. 5,000. 8. ATASCADERO LITTLE LEAGUE 6,000. 9 ,600.# 9. ATASCADERO YOUTH FOOTBALL 10,000. 5,000. 00. BIA 15,748. 15,748. 11 . BRONZE TIGER PROJECT 1 ,000. 1 ,000. 12. CAL POLY ARTS 250. 250. 13. CARING CALLERS 175. 175. 14 . CHUMASH COUNCIL OF CAMPFIRE 1 ,000. 500. 15. CRIME STOPPERS 500. 500. 16. EASTER SEAL SOCIET`( 500. 250. 17. ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION 1 ,628. 1 ,628. ( Sr . Health Screening ) 18. FAMILY SERVICES CENTER 1 ,000. 500. 19 . FOOD BANK COALITION 2,000. 1 ,000. 20 . HOSPICE OF SLO COUNTY 1 ,000. 500. 21 . HOTLINE OF SLO COUNTY 700. 500. &2. MOZART FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION 250. 250. 23 . NORTH COUNTY CYCLING CLUB 2,000. 1 ,000. 24. NO. COUNTY WOMEN ' S SHELTER 20,000. 10,000. 1990-91 AGENCY REQUESTS AMOUNT AMOUNT NAME OF AGENCY REQUESTED APPROVED 25. OMBUDSMAN SERVICE OF SLO $ 500. $ 300. 26. R.S.V.P. 500. 500. 27. SAN LUIS OBISPO CO. VISITORS 3,800. 3,800. 28. SAN LUIS COUNTY YOUTH SYMPHONY 500. 250. 29. SLO GOLD COAST CHORUS 850. -0- 30. SENIOR CITIZENS UNITED 2,400. 2,400. 31 . SENIOR NUTRITION PROGRAM 750. 500. 32. FRIENDS OF THE LIBRARY 35,000. 3. GIRLS SOFTBALL LEAGUE 161 ,500. -0- GRAND TOTALS 311 ,876. 91 , 151 . *Includes $4 ,600 of carryover money from FY 89-90. **Although nothing was appropriated , the $35,000 is a reserve on the General Fund . 0 • Exhibit I ANNUAL APPROPRIATIONS BY FUND, BY DEPARTMENT, FOR FISCAL YEAR 1990-91 DEPARTMENT NAME AMOUNT GENERAL FUND 110 - City Council 40,785 120 - City Clerk 47,500 130 - City Treasurer 3,765 140 - City Attorney 65,000 150 - City Manager 129, 175 200 - Police 2,053 , 140 300 - Fire 1 , 146,770 410 - Public Works Administration/Engineering 367,480 500 - Community Development 773,410 605 - Parks, Recreation & Zoo - Administration 53,985 610 - Recreation 344,305 611 - Aquatics 24,665 620 - Parks 344 ,005 640 - Building Maintenance 200,525 660 - Streets Maintenance 460,565 710 - Personnel 114,625 720 - Finance 2741400 740 - Risk Management 3071300 820 - Non-Department 450,293 Subtotal - Fund 1 7,201 ,693 GAS TAX FUND 621 - St . Maintenance/Gas Tax 93,500 900 - Capital Improvements 390,000 Subtotal - Fund 2 483,500 ZOO OPERATIONS FUND 630 - Zoo Operations 222,500 DIAL-A-RIDE FUND 450 - Dial-A-Ride Operations 291 ,655 WASTEWATER OPERATIONS 430 - Wastewater Operations 801 ,585 PARKS CONCESSIONS ENTERPRISE 621 - Park Concessions 48,609 • EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 765 - Equipment Replacement 179, 100 TREE PLANTING TRUST 1301 - Tree Planting 21 , 158 DEPARTMENT NAME AMOUNT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT #3 1403 - Debt Service 6,420 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT #4 1404 - Debt Service 161 ,590 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT #5 1405 - Debt Service 54,006 81 REVENUE BONDS - WASTEWATER 1405 - Debt Service 123,000 89 C.O.P. - POLICE FACILITY/PAVILION 1452 - Debt Service 396,300 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL 900 - Capital Improvements 176,000 89 C.O.P. - CONSTRUCTION FUND 900 - Capital Improvements 411 ,900 FIRE IMPACT FEE FUND 900 - Capital Improvements 47 ,000 PARKS IMPACT FEE FUND 900 - Capital Improvements 65,900 ZOO CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 900 - Capital Improvements 30,000 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE FUND 900 - Capital Improvements 140,000 BRIDGE IMPACT FEE FUND 900 - Capital Improvements 360,000 STREET MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS 622 - Street Maintenance Districts 70,500 LTF/NON-TRANSIT CAPITAL 900 - Capital Improvements 459, 150 BUILDING/GROUNDS/EQUIPMENT IMPACT 900 - Capital Improvements 55,050 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT/ENGINEERING IMPACT 900 - Capital Improvements 31 ,000 ADMINISTRATION BUILDING RENOVATION 900 - Capital Improvements 143,000 GRAND TOTAL 11 ,980,616. RESOLUTION NO. 93-90 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO APPROVING A BUDGET FOR THE 1990-91 FISCAL YEAR AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS THEREOF BE IT RESOLVED by the Atascadero City Council as follows: Section 1 : Pursuant to provisions of the Government Code, a budget is hereby approved, per attached entitled "Annual Appropriations by Fund , by Department" , and as may be amended by City Council for the City of Atascadero for Fiscal Year 1990-91 . Section 2: The City Manager may transfer appropriations within, but not between, each of the departmental activities, as required to achieve the orderly and efficient functioning of the City . Section 3: The Council , from time to time, by motion, may approve additional appropriations, as they deem necessary . On motion by Councilperson and seconded by Councilperson , the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ADOPTED: CITY OF ATASCADERO ROBERT LILLEY, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: LEE DAYKA, City Clerk RAY WINDSOR , City Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: ARTHER MONTANDON, City Attorney REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item: A-6 Through: Ray Windsor , City Manager Meeting Date: 7/10/90 From: Mark Joseph, Administrative Services Director SUBJECT: Adopting FY 90-91 Position Allocation Resolution 95-90 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Council approve Resolution 95- 90, adopting the Position Allocation Resolution for fiscal year 1990-91 . BACKGROUND: Each year as part of adopting the Annual Budget , the number of positions allocated by Department and job description is established by Council action. The attached resolution shows the number of authorized positions as of July 1 , 1990 and January 1 , 1991 . The two columns is to accommodate the fact that the Planning Technician position in Community Development is recommended to become effective on January 1 . res95-90 RESOLUTION NO. 95-90 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO ADOPTING A POSITION ALLOCATION SCHEDULE FOR THE CITY OF ATASCADERO NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Council of the City of Atascadero does hereby ratify: Section 1 . Position Allocation Schedule. The schedule of positions allocated by Department and Job Classification shall be as set forth in Exhibit I , attached to this resolution and made a part of this resolution. Section 2. Effective Date. The effective date of this resolution shall be July 1 , 1990. Section 3. Amendments. Amendments changing either the job classification or the number of positions shall be by Council • resolution. On motion by Councilperson and seconded by Councilperson the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: DATE: ATTEST: LEE DAYKA, City Clerk ROBERT LILLEY , Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: ARTHER MONTANDON RAY WINDSOR City Attorney City Manager i CITY OF ATASCADERO PERMANENT POSITIONS ALLOCATED FOR FISCAL YEAR 1990-91 CITY CLERK 7-1-90 1-1-91 Deputy City Clerk: 1 .0 1 .0 Department Total 1 .0 1 .0 CITY MANAGER City Manager 1 .0 1 .0 Secretary to the City Manager 1 .0 1 .0 Department Total 2.0 2.0 POLICE DEPARTMENT Chief of Police I .0 1 .0 Police Lieutenant 2.0 2 .0 Police Seraeant 4 .0 4 .0 Police Agent 5.0 5 .0 Police Officer 16 .0, 16.0 Support Services Manaaer 1 .0 1 .0 Support Services Lead Technician 1 .0 1 .0 Support Services Technician 7.5 7 .5 Department Total 37.5 37.5 FIRE DEPARTMENT Fire Chief 1 .0 1 .0 Battalion Chief 2.0 2.0 Fire Captain* 4 .0 4.0 Fire Engineer* 4.0 4.0 Firefighter* 5.0 5.0 Administrative Secretary 1 .0 1 .0 Office Assistant I 0.5 0.5 Department Total 17.5 17.5 *Up to six positions may be designated Paramedics PUBLIC WORKS Director of Public Works/City Engineer 1 .0 1 .0 Senior Civil Engineer 1 .0 1 .0 Associate Civil Engineer 1 .0 1 .0 Engineering Technician II 1 .0 1 .0 Engineering Technician I 1 .0 1 .0 Administrative Secretary 1 .0 1 .0 Office Assistant I 0.5 0 .5 Superintendent of Public Works 1 .0 1 .0 Natural Resources Specialist 1 .0 1 .0 Wastewater Operations Supervisor 1 .0 1 .0 Wastewater Treatment Operator II 1 . 0 1 .0 • PUBLIC WORKS (CONTINUED) 7-1-90 1-1-91 Wastewater Treatment Operator I 2.0 2.0 Wastewater Treatment Operator- In-Training 1 .0 1 .0 Department Total 13.5 13.5 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Director of Community Development 1 .0 1 .0 City Planner 1 .0 1 .0 Senior Planner 1 .0 1 .0 Assistant Planner 2.0 2.0 Planning Technician 0.0 1 .0 Building Official 1 .0 1 .0 Plan Check Engineer 1 .0 1 .0 Compliance Officer 1 .0 1 .0 Building Inspector II 2.0 2.0 Administrative Secretary 1 .6 1 .6 Building Aide 1 .0 1 .0 Office Assistant II 1 .0 1 .0 Department Total 13.6 14.6 PARKS, RECREATION AND ZOO Director of Parks , Recreation & Zoo 1 .0 1 .0 Assistant Parks. Recreation & Zoo Director 1 .0 1 .0 Recreation Supervisor 2.0 2.0 Administrative Secretary 1 .0 1 .0 Office Assistant I 1 .0 1 .0 Park Supervisor 1 .0 1 .0 Maintenance Leadworker 1 .0 1 .0 Maintenance Worker II 8.0 8.0 Maintenance Worker I 5.0 5.0 Street Maintenance Supervisor 1 .0 1 .0 Building Maintenance Specialist 1 .0 1 .0 Department Total 23.0 23.0 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Director of Administrative Services 1 .0 1 .0 Assistant Finance Director 1 .0 1 .0 Administrative Secretary 1 .0 1 .0 Finance Technician 1 .0 1 .0 Account Clerk II 1 .0 1 .0 Account Clerk I 1 .0 1 .0 Personnel Coordinator 1 .0 1 .0 Department Total 7.0 7.0 TOTAL FULL-TIME PERMANENT POSITIONS 115. 1 116. 1 pers90-91 REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item: A-7 Through: Ray Windsor, City Manager Meeting Date: 7/10/90 From: Mark Joseph, Administrative Services Directo011l SUBJECT: Adopting FY 90-91 Salary Resolution 96-90 . RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Council approve Resolution 96- 90 adopting the Salary Resolution for fiscal year 1990-91 . BACKGROUND: The attached resolution contains the salaries for all authorized classifications in the City effective July 1 , 1990. For the most part , the salaries have been established by the meet-and-confer process with Bargaining Units. Management , Mid- Management and Confidential Employees show no change in salaries, because meetings are still taking place. It is expected that this salary resolution, will be amended to reflect the new rates within the next two Council sessions. The attached resolution includes new salaries for the SEIU bargaining units (General and Clerical ) , based on the MOU ' s anticipated to be adopted at today ' s session. res96-90 • RESOLUTION NO. 96-90 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO ADOPTING A SCHEDULE OF SALARIES FOR ALL JOB CLASSIFICATIONS WITHIN THE CITY OF ATASCADERO NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Council of the City of Atascadero does hereby ratify: Section 1 . Classifications Added. The following job classifications are hereby added : Associate Civil Engineer Natural Resources Specialist Planning Technician Section 2. Salary Schedule. The monthly salaries of all authorized job classifications shall be as set forth in Exhibit I , which shall be made a part of this resolution; . Section 3. Effective Date. The effective date of this resolution shall be July 1 , 1990. On motion by Councilperson and seconded by Councilperson the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: DATE: ATTEST: LEE DAYKA, City Clerk ROBERT LILLEY , Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: ARTHER MONTANDON, City Attorney RAY WINDSOR, City Manager a �=e _ - - - - - I CL t c OO c OO c 00 OO c 0 c oocomc Moh OO c 0w 0 010 1 wQ a w yr o 0 1` m W Ic 00 00c 00C 00C 00C 00C Ot` c 0101r .00C ON 4ry hwh .-1N wm vo wmC- m '0 O to aT �f tr, M t,, qr w a ICw ,0 �O Lei w .O C O M M O m'�0 o o, r—.4 a• 1 fl m' Q P M 1• h f` N m O � h7 �" U r 0, Q w 'o 0• tt Nd 4 .0 N 'p M P Cd r_ v C W 1 0` N N r c M of It m m ir IA N m 10 h7 N w.+a M y w Cd a �0 Q m N ir M o- N w m' o a O w I h M tT q Q eT ir M N C N Cd f, M'Mr N N ts M N M M C M N C N M C•:N Nfi w N C <N w N N C 'N N N N C• L I MM ri cc o mA c it -o Ir o , Cd•4 c ON rM P, VV -,0 .14, Ir t-M --trtD a 0. 1`f ma , 1 VM .+ w MN wN Cw0 q Nm Cw`0 •0 0C• fir` 0. O < MO Oa: I` 14 -a V) M N f` N t� It 0 Ic h7O M m Ih O w h !C)m 4r •o -T N m aS to P ty 1 NM MM .•t h) m Nm Nqh n rw mo, v 0+P q Nd o Mat r oQ re 0w Qat A I wm V 1` !` 7O NM ff MwNOO fl wM C OO eTN Nw Nm C wO C r4 V) 0 O 1 MN C NN t, MM C•1N te MN t, MMC• M_NC NMC N_NC wNC• CIA-.4 C NNC• NN wNr• L I •+ •! 4q OOC 1T <} C Oat I NML 0 C w 1 O .� OD 0 <TL* . N'N mh7 NI`- Q C w I Cat mm Com mho V—T cm hm M -T 1`r-i rl v ImN om Maar• mo (n I o v oc q,w K o a inw ,om c t- yo c r- -T *aau oQ 1a'�1 0• w C so 10 1 .eo 1 CdAC OO a o v OO *4 a)f, (` PC• o q mat r- ca 0• h7 a NIA mm j m6, a nh7 U 1 0'D(%, 1010 C• N0• C 10 'Tr N0 C mm It ON 0 0.01 M .+V 100C• -1 0C- 0 wM C m0• 1 MNC, NN re MN f4 CJCt 1w MCd:t, NNC• MNwCdr- :NNC •..N Cr +s N •! NC'-) w I iii I mN 0 NN C MM 0 NM C ON< MCd q 0. 10 V.: r` 0 0 .+ at M Jr. in Mo re. 0- CD N-TC- w 1it7 0` & 0 •0 K .+M Lr Ko 4 o M M c C m r• v M Cd c •0 O 0 P OIC 'T IA O'm M 10 m C Q w v7 to 1 ,otr cvcar• !no Cio C3 Ca aoh c0 vQ Mi a'-+ N .;L* M m W 1 N 10 m m 0,N.fl m 0, C 0 m 11, M-0 0 *0 N I ol O 0 10 m 0 O .0 r, N .0 M I to m c 10 h7 mho aTaJ C 0i- -T N, C 00, NN mw a mm 14 N0 11. X00 O.0 0 0• m a ON c 1` m C ! NCd .1 Cd MN NN Mw NNC• Cl wN NN �' •� C• r4 ww NCd .-!w _1 L I Oat q h7 h7 a -T-*4 ' in m ir. mN r mOC m +0 Q �O ++ N mM Oat It) N v�r4 1 a S w i ^0 V) cv T-QT v0 .1 a• 0• M OU In 10 mr- N10 mC+.0 •0 Cd r, mrd c Cdti re Z m 1 D 1t v v hm , aT �t'7N mU m1` CdO hip m N o w'N " NN IAM IT O i M 4 %0 %0 vm %0M V4 0 ON NN V ON r, dim a M 0 N M0•V Ohl q h71- M. 10 ¢ 1 t,- V C MM 0 a- %00 Mw 0 Am r, 0 0 r !` O r, m '0 r, w0• C 100 C 0•h7 11 mr rl 0• whr. eN 1 NNC NNC NNC NC•1r. N .IC Cd NC NN Cl)r. LrilwC w .+C• wN ww o i oo- oa oo o0 oo co oo o0 oo o0 oo ' o0 oo ` co oo olo . < ww .dwC .+ O C -4 ww NN •+w .aw �+ af Nwr, Ow wIn a wO N •4 ••+ h") 1 pj 1 i y N i N 0 u O s •o L ib 0 i r Iu = L„ O a tr 9 ut o 'a 1 Aw >- a U • 3 N - - v y, w u to; + E c M, u a ►-z ,�to 0 1 ON A0 -+ _ ._ N u0 a, u mL;r S Fi i r, \ ! N U N - � U a N 1 4 �-+ u !v > .� . ._ O 7 - @1 d a - !- -J 3 c 0 i �e > \ ! ' 'a - v- u .6 - r- , 0 > v (0 0 7 > !L i' u U 0 0 s — h t > v �' U I.L 'r- to a t ._ pl+- Q t''v (1! 4.4 Q) +- I u 1- - %_ V iY 03 a 03 V L. 'o - 0 4• M 4- C c u u 1- � +0 ro - A W til I a' CI . -5 c, tU tr a ' •- 0 -� w m 41 . S - C•- c C C !• U U > i m N U •- •- iL_ a- 4- tT%- -' -1 • a -' 0 0 0. :0+ '0 i6 !- ' T W V.- N N 41 F r I < v U 1L ,< 'o •o• C 0 -r N ►- - a- r •o a Q-4. -I. N - u m � • 0 U IL, o th Oi - O O c •- ex U 1- I (!1 C U + :. u U 0 M- U N U N' 0 i4 i O > i 0 c r 4 1: N 0 C w 1 Y - - v o o . �- v a - v a ,- -• _ c . s• iLa o - a m I !_ E - L mtn mm - - 4 s -� u r • as UJ_ L-o my ... - go 1- !•-. uE L O 1 - to 0 0.- 10:IA N tn L` tv to 0 al tU !- 0 : W •-• ._-' 7 C +B le -' 6333 u•0 W 7 I 0- as QQ' C 9n ZCL (La mm mm mw LL UW ZS as :3 QQ w i 0w M .t6 o Ow Oo p o0 o0 CdN OO OO Ofl OO (t)0 O0 w "1 w w A 1 .+w .+ w w w -4 -4 mm h7NC .4N -f-4 w1`• w-.0 .4.4 .+Cl CdNC M.+ ww ww 0 1 .�w .t.+ Mhz Nw Cd t`r w !` 0� in wM r- 1> Mm IA IA mM ww MN MM .i M . U 1 NNC NNC• NN MMC NN MN NNC MMC NN ITN N`0 10m -010 MIA '0.0 aTaT w i LS l9 L-W 0 x ES Z5 ZS Z E ZS � Z wU Stn m 0?m 0'CO EO EO = 0 Z i SLS ZZ ES fZ � Z ZS ZZ ZZ ZS ULLWLLU LSU 00 LSU 0U U O I O0 OO w .+ ww .�w ww .i ww wwC rdM at h7 h7 h)b]Lo in U) b") In V) 'o %0 � Vr \.. l.• �✓ v V V v �� _:✓ v `.► V v+' tirM rll ad Wf► N N b q 0 b h b N m q m Ci F V:N 0 !D N 0• 0' N I r4N W 1 C N.�+ Mar 'N 0 1 0 17V 0 me i II IT O V) O V M 10 A0 N D. CO r N CL I C N .0 M 0 W 3 0 0 0, Nr N0, N i V C N a� M 10 U I N.meq, �C r 0. 1 r, a0D NQ C -.0 }W- I V 1�• a) N 0 O 0• W tp I ITIIn pc Q CD ' w�tti NNr10 - -.4�4 ..1 L I V �0 O N O H 'rW- Ife O 0 0 !tet p:p r Z U) iI M In f, 0 < !D 0, . 0 i a V) W C V7 N c V7 0, Z a I OMV NNC ar- in . O I OO c 00C OIC) CL I .+ri - c V) -4 t I i 1 0 u o i 41 1 L C . Innst, \ I r. 4'• W 4- L • ..• P- i UU U W W I f� N u 0 m (0 En > sa cna H � cc w h- i uu uu oa IWi a, i r v- IL 01 — �- 00 if W 'I I LL O c CL Ci a w W 1 mo- O N C4.+ R ' r U I et� V C N PM-IM Z I UUU ail N0? O i `010 NO) D• 0• l z REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL Meeting, Date:7/10/90 CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda -Item: A-8 (A-H) Through : Ray Windsor, City Manager From,: Greg Luke, Director of Public Works SUNKC-T s Establishment of various stop intersections REC OM,1g.:AtI?AT I QN: The Traffic Committee recommendsthat Council, adopt , the attached resolutions establishing stop intersections at various locations within the city. BACKGRQM The, numerous requests for stop signs are .the result of ;an annual field survey conducted by the Street Department Supervisor . The Traffic Committee has viewed these sites and concurs with the request of ,staff . DISCS SIGN The stop signs requested will provide traffic 'controls at currently uncontrolled intersections. OPTIONS: l) Approve all resolutions 2) Deny all resolutions ' 3) Approve or deny on an individual batik.. ' FjSC , INFACI: The cost of these installations will be approximately $800.00 to be paid out of current fiscal year budgeted funds . Attachments: Resolution 77-90 - Traffic Way @ City Yard Resolution 78-90 -- San Andres @ MarchantAve. Resolution 79--90 - -Corothar Ave. at Marchant ` Resolution 80-90 - San Andres @ Atascadero Ave, Resolution- 81-90 - Magdelena Ave @ Mercedes Ave Resolution 82--90 - Amapoa Ave . @, Carbaril Ave Resolution 83-90 - Navajoa @ Santa Ynex Resolution 84--90 - Serra Ave @ San- Andres RESOLUTION NO. 77-.90 RESOLUTION. OF THE COUNCIL CE THE CITY -OF ATASCADERfl DESIGNAT AiG A STM' INTERSECTION ON TRAFFIC WAY AT THE ENTRANCE TO THE CITY YARD WHEREAS, Section 4-2 .801 at seq, of the Atascadero Municipal Cade allows the _City. Traffic Engineer to determine the location of STOP intersections, and' to place! and maintain appropriate signs or ma.rkings ,indicating the same; and 'WHEREAS, the Atasoaderc "Traf'f'ic . Committee has recommended that establishing 'a STOPintersection on Traffic° Way at the entrance, tothe City.' Yard wi13 improve a potentially hazardous traffic situation, F NOW,, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLED that the C ty ...o f- Atascadero. directs the City Traffic Engineer toplace and maintain appropriate signs or markings indicating STOP' intersections t the location listed above. On motion by and seconded by ,the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following `roll call vote: AYES NOES ABSENT:` ADOPTED, i, ATTEST: LEE DAYKA, City Clerk RQBE�T � LIZLEY,Mayor APPROVED .AS TO `ORM: APPRQVED'=AS TO CONTENT: ART'HER MONTANDON GREG L. LUKE City.Attorney Director of Public Works City ,Engineer _ ' RESOLUTION NO. 78-90 RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO DESIGNATING A STOP INTERSECTION ON SAN ANDRES AVENUE AT MARCHANT AVENUE WHEREAS, Section 4-2 . 801 et seq. of the Atascadero Municipal Code allows the City Traffic Engineer to determine the location of STOP intersections , and to place and maintain appropriate signs or markings indicating the same; and WHEREAS, the Atascadero Traffic Committee has recommended that establishing a STOP intersection on San Andres Avenue at Marchant Avenue will improve a potentially hazardous traffic situation . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Atascadero directs the City Traffic Engineer to place and maintain appropriate signs or markings indicating STOP intersections at the location listed above . On motion by , and seconded by ,the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote : AYES : NOES : ABSENT : ADOPTED: ATTEST : LEE DAYKA, City Clerk ROBERT B. LILLEY ,Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT : ARTHER MONTANDON GREG L . LUKE City Attorney Director of Public Works City Engineer RESOLUTION NO. 79-90 RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO DESIGNATING A STOP INTERSECTION ON COROMAR AVENUE AT MARCHANT AVENUE WHEREAS , Section 4-2 . 801 et seq, of the Atascadero Municipal Code allows the City Traffic Engineer to determine the location of STOP intersections , and to place and maintain appropriate signs or markings indicating the same; and WHEREAS, the Atascadero Traffic Committee has recommended that establishing a STOP intersection on Coromar Avenue at Marchant Avenue will improve a potentially hazardous traffic situation . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Atascadero directs the City Traffic Engineer to place and maintain appropriate signs or markings indicating STOP intersections at the location listed above . On motion by and seconded by ,the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote : AYES : NOES : ABSENT : ADOPTED: ATTEST : LEE DAYKA, City Clerk ROBERT B. LILLEY,Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT : ARTHER MONTANDON GREG L . LUKE City Attorney Director of Public Works City Engineer • RESOLUTION NO. 80-90 RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO DESIGNATING A STOP INTERSECTION ON SAN ANDRES AT ATASCADERO AVENUE WHEREAS, Section 4-2 . 801 et seq, of the Atascadero Municipal Code allows the City Traffic Engineer to determine the location of STOP intersections , and to place and maintain appropriate signs or markings indicating the same; and WHEREAS , the Atascadero Traffic Committee has recommended that establishing a STOP intersection on San Andres at Atascadero Avenue will improve a potentially hazardous traffic situation . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Atascadero directs the City Traffic Engineer to place and maintain appropriate signs or markings indicating STOP S intersections at the location listed above . On motion by , and seconded by ,the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote : AYES : NOES : ABSENT : ADOPTED: ATTEST : LEE DAYKA, City Clerk ROBERT B `LILLEY ,Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT : ARTHER MONTANDON GREG L . LUKE . City Attorney Director of Public Works City Engineer • RESOLUTION NO. 81-90 RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO DESIGNATING A STOP INTERSECTION ON MAGDELENA AVENUE AT MERCEDES AVENUE WHEREAS, Section 4-2 . 801 et seq, of the Atascadero Municipal Code allows the City Traffic Engineer to determine the location of STOP intersections , and to place and maintain appropriate signs or markings indicating the same; and WHEREAS, the Atascadero Traffic Committee has recommended that establishing a STOP intersection on Magdelena Avenue at Mercedes Avenue will improve a potentially hazardous traffic situation . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Atascadero directs the City Traffic Engineer to place and maintain appropriate signs or markings indicating STOP intersections at the location listed above . On motion by and seconded by ,the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote : AYES : NOES : ABSENT : ADOPTED: ATTEST : LEE DAYKA, City Clerk ROBERT B. LILLEY ,Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: ARTHER MONTANDON GREG L . LUKE City Attorney Director of Public Works City Engineer RESOLUTION NO. 82-90 RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO DESIGNATING A STOP INTERSECTION ON AMAPOA AVENUE AT CURBARIL, AVENUE WHEREAS, Section 4-2 . 801 et seq, of the Atascadero Municipal Code allows the City Traffic Engineer to determine the location of STOP intersections , and to place and maintain appropriate signs or markings indicating the same; and WHEREAS, the Atascadero Traffic Committee has recommended that establishing a STOP intersection on Amapoa Avenue at Curbaril Avenue will improve a potentially hazardous traffic situation . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Atascadero directs the City Traffic Engineer to place and maintain appropriate signs or markings indicating STOP intersections at the location listed above . On motion by , and seconded by ,the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote : AYES : NOES : ABSENT : ADOPTED: ATTEST : LEE DAYKA, City Clerk ROBERT B. LILLEY,Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT : ARTHER MONTANDON M +N GREG L . LUKE City Attorney Director of Public Works City Engineer RESOLUTION NO. 83-90 RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO DESIGNATING A STOP INTERSECTION ON NAVAJOA AVENUE AT SANTA YNEZ AVENUE WHEREAS , Section 4-2 . 801 et seq, of the Atascadero Municipal Code allows the City Traffic Engineer to determine the location of STOP intersections , and to place and maintain appropriate signs or markings indicating the same; and WHEREAS, the Atascadero Traffic Committee has recommended that establishing a STOP intersection on Navaioa Avenue at Santa Ynez Avenue will improve a potentially hazardous traffic situation . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Atascadero directs the City Traffic Engineer to place and maintain appropriate signs or markings indicating STOP intersections at the location listed above . On motion by , and seconded by ,the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote : AYES : NOES : ABSENT : ADOPTED: ATTEST : LEE DAYKA, City Clerk ROBERT B. LILLEY,Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT : ARTHER MONTANDON GREG L LUKE City Attorney Director of Public Works City Engineer i RESOLUTION NO. 84-90 RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO DESIGNATING A STOP INTERSECTION ON SERRA AVENUE AT SAN ANDRES AVENUE WHEREAS , Section 4-2 . 801 et seq. of the Atascadero Municipal Code allows the City Traffic Engineer to determine the location of STOP intersections , and to place and maintain appropriate signs or markings indicating the same; and WHEREAS, the Atascadero Traffic Committee has recommended that establishing a STOP intersection on Serra Avenue at San Andres Avenue will improve a potentially hazardous traffic situation . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Atascadero directs the City Traffic Engineer to place and maintain appropriate signs or markings indicating STOP intersections at the location listed above. On motion by , and seconded by ,the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote : AYES : NOES : ABSENT : ADOPTED: ATTEST : LEE DAYKA, City Clerk ROBERT^B. LILLEY,Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT : ARTHER MONTANDON GREG L . LUKE • City Attorney Director of Public Works City Engineer REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL Meeting Date: 7/10/90 CITY OF ATASCADER ? Agenda Item A-9 ' Through: Ray Windsor, City Manager l From: Greg Luke, Director of Public Works _ SUBJECT: ' Establishrdeent of a No Parking area along a portion of the El Camino Real frontage of Adobe Plaza ,, R: OI�END TIONS Traffic. Committee recommends, that Couhcil adapt R volution', No. 90-90 establ�ishing ;a No Parking zone as stated above. The request is the. result of citizen- complaa.nt,s, at"off requests and the observations Qf the Traffic -Co ttee. DISCUESIONs There , is a severe sight distane e 'hazard fur vehicles attempting to exit Adobe Plaza onto El Camino Real .' They curvature of the street along with the on-street parking o.f vehicles prevents motorists from seeing oncoming - traffic . Thee hazard is increased with the frequent .parking of large vehicles next -t o, tnve driveways . The Traffic Committees h'as received various requests for e t-otal emli iniation of parking along this' section of El. Gami.no,Reaa,l : Recognizing, that parking is at a paremium. in this area, the Committee has attempted to be as sensitive as possible while peeping traffic safety the' primary concern, The recommended modification will increase the exa.sting ,red curbing which extends from each 'side of the" driveways ..,,,, M12NS a 1) Approver Resolution No. 90-90 2) Deny Resolution No. 90--90 3) Return to, Committee for review FISCAL ItlyACTr 1 The cost of. this modification is app oxirna4tely $200.00 to be;.paid out-, ofcurrently budge ed funds . ' - Attachments : Resolution' a R N ESC7LUTIC3 NEI, 90--9E3 RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCAPERQ DESIGNATING 46 PARKING ZONES ON "EL `CAMI'NO REAL ALONG A. PORTION OF THE F'R NTAGE OF ADOBE 'LAZA WHE F S, Section F 4- .1,101 ,- et sequence` of the"",, t Atascader0 Municipal .' Cndt allows the' City •Tratffic 'Enaln+eer, to d.es ,g%ate .No Parking areata; �a,n& to I place and":maint,ai�rt. approprlAate",si,gns or 'mask' ' indic�xti ig the a ey .anci- WTE7S,,. The Txaffic "orc►itte has, stu,dad the traffic problemst this l0oati.on"' and bas determinned that establishing a N0Parking , ,zone along 'a. portion of, --th,- frontage of Adobe Plaza- would al,10,0ia.te hazardous traffic , condition.. Nth; TM_1 ,0Rt, BE," IT ' =R1SOLVED v that, the City Or Atasea.d."erci ` rlaz'ects the City 'traffic gineer tc piece ',` maintain appropr"iati signs car .maskings, ,,a'e indicated above , . r on " Motion; by u man Concil a s�c0 by Councilman' ,.the foregoing resolution: hereby adopted` in ; its entirety on the fold cawing X011 c'alI ". ..y vote; _ AYES: NOES: 'G ABSENT: ADOPTED: ' ATTEST': CITY 'OF ATASCADERO - ' LEE DAY--KA, -,City Clerk, ROBERT B.% LALEY,, ),Mkyor i 4 APPROVE.AS TOORM` N: APPAt74?ED AS ;TE) CE32�' 047: ARTM MONTANDO "L " city: Attorney, Director,. 0f' Public Works City Irm_qineer:. j h i � y k h 1 A fn i i © C iF 1 €9 1 O rrl - 70 1 REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL Meeting Date:7J1,0f90 CITY OF ATASCADER0 Agenda . Item: A-10 Through : Ray Windsor, City .Manager' From Greg Luke, Director of Public' Works S Modifications at. El Camino Real. and Rosario Avenuerelated to the, new police station,. B=22ZKDAT.JgN e The Traffic Committee 'recommends that Council 'adopt Resolution 91-90 providing ' for various / modifications in the area, of, thy* new police station BAQ&QBP-M: The Traffic Committee has received a numbear,, of requests fr'om: the. Police Department for traffic-related .changes: in anticipation of the completion of the new police £acili.ty,. Ae SSZ a DJ2g �Q Several modifications adjacent to the. neer Police Station were requested. These changes' include, additional red curbinq along a portion of tete El Camino Real frontagee- and on Rosario frc:m. E1 Camino Real to the 'entrance. Also recommended was -a,`;reque ole to have. CAUTION painted .cin the sidewalk at the El Camino deal drit+eaY due tcs the, limited sight distance. The finalrequest saes 'to, restripe the double-double yellow "left `.turn lane on El Camino Reil so that cars exiting the driveway can legilly, turn left- All eft .A;ll of thesel modifications are relatively . minor and_ were approved by the Committeaeb.F The Committee also"determined that -a complete review o£ any' _ tra££ic problems encountered at this, location should be made at a later date. 0 'T Approve `Resolution 91--90 Deny Resolution' 91--90 y Return ' to Traffic Committee for Review FISCAL 22A'GT The cost of these modifications will be approximately $600.00, to be- paid out of currently budgeted funds,. r Attachments : Resolution No, 91--90 RESOLUTION NO. 912-90 RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASC,ADER4 CREATING A. NO.,PARKING ZdNt, MODIFYING T&.S Eft", TURN LANE,, A14D AUTHORIZIN CAUTIONARYPAINTIATG SAT THE POLICE STATION • WHEREAS, Sects "4-2;'467"e1 sequence' oaf.' the"`Atascadesro Municipal Cade allh s `the C�:ty' Traf�%c �.`ngia��rer' to 'remowey reloce a or discontinue a:ny t;raffit'control device; ar�d TM. W EBS,, Section 4- w 1101 it s.eq xenc of tha Atascade:rb ion cipel Code allows the City Tr, aff.i0 Engineer, 1 to designate No Park:ingr, z4rea,, 11an&,,t,o place and maintainN ' appropriate °signs or markings ,i.ndicating) the same; and. Seetibn 4= :4�3I. . tet. ��c�aan�e of tea Atascade<ro Municipal Cole allows the City Traffic-:En$i,n*+�r to pla."tl a and`maintain official fir+ ff p-control,: d i.ce4i in4tl' f. !. f W Ea`,.; ' The "Traffic o�ittee has studied the" txa#, ice � . situation . at this Ioc:A ion at the ris' rt of: .the At:asc"a rca Police, bepa,rtment and has detearmin4d that modifiacaeti ons" a r* T-• needed', an , WHEREAS, Th{e Tr4fti c Committee, bias deterreed � �t el m*nating . parking Roo rid Avenue from E1 Camino Ree l to the entrance to the Poli-co, "Station""wn�.ld i cr a" raf" saf ety" ' ,encs WH S., The Trarffin` ~ �iitte!e: has dete�rmin d that ' establishing tib Parking areas .;�ar� E�". Gino Real adjacent ,to the dri�:e!wa "Mould a racreaas s gh 'd Mance," and WH 5. ' TheTraff c C.„ itt ee has' .det,ormine4 th:et ` painting th.e,.word "CAUTION" oji the si40w. alk ?4t ach side~° �f the El' Camino Real Ariver4ay'.111 would provide: notice tc� . Ped Qst'arians of the, ossi ai lity of 'o -comi0q tra f, c; and WHEREAS., The Traf'fic' " Ccimittie hays determi�i�d that. rep3ac ng the" double de able. 3, 411,'w "..e•�rip za"g . cin 'the �: . erft' turn,, lane, On El C6A10o Rea with` double yellow stripinjr. would permit legal .eft turn mdvement from : `the Polis• Department ;Driveway).onto EJ *iho, Meal . w l NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Atascadero directs the City Traffic Engineer to place and maintain appropriate signs or markings as indicated above and on Exhibit A attached hereto . On Motion by Councilman ,and seconded by Councilman ,the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote : AYES : NOES : ABSENT : ADOPTED: ATTEST : LEE DAYKA, City Clerk ROBERT B. LILLEY, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT : ARTHER MONTANDON GREGORY LUKE City Attorney Director of Public Works City Engineer D m � c A r ! tv a :17 s 71, m t4oIj e S 3. } S �i ' er CA i U Tt ON rn . o e O 3 REPORT: TO CITY COUNCIL Meeting late:7/10/90 CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item: .Atll Through: Ray' Windsor, ' City Manager From: Greg Luke, Director of Public Works Elm=?.� Establishment of a 3-Way stop intersection on, San Anselircmo Avenue. at Monterey Road. The Traffic Committee recommends that Council ',adopt , the attached resolution establishing stop signs on.both directions -of San Anselmo at Monterey Road thereby creating a 3-ia,y stop intersection. (Resolution No. 88-90 There have been numerous requets in recent years " from concerned; parents , residents and members cif the .Monterey Road,-PTA- regarding oad -PTA,regard:ing pedestrian and motorist safety at this location. Various methods of improving safety at this .location were discussed. The Traffic Committee viewed the> location and have 'determined that a 3--Way stop would provide' the greatest" levol of safety for' both the pedestrian., and the traveling public . tJPT I ON5: k) Adopt Resolution No. 88-90 2) Deny>Resol,ut on No. 88-90 3) Return item to Traffic Committee for further review FISCAL ZMPA�T: The cost of this 'modification will be approximately $150.00 to be paid out" of current budgeted funds . . Attachments : Resolution No. 88-90 ry RESOLUTION NO. $$-90 CITY p+�r RE�SOLUT.IO 0 TFC:; + +C��gOUnNC �y. �3F T�h�E.�r� �+yryn CI A L yO�,E+_ ATA+Sit[�r'A.kt.CaCCO. V.� A #.gF41V'�`, A: g�STO }�y��Jy.1;7Tq+t +�.g}�r4 d ION a �4'..OR BOTH DIRECTIONS -OF a7!'lil� PSi�ta�E.4MO AVENUE F.iNUE : f AT MONTEREY, RO" WHEREAS, :Section =2 80l, of ' i4qof tho'Ataseadaero Municipal Code , a11,0_ws the I City Traffic Engineer to determine ' the Location of TSP: �tteecti�«hs�, and 'to plat and matin a n° appoptiat+� sins "err Markings ihd.iat in3 the same} 'end ' W E S, , thekascadero, ,.Traffic „ Co ra `f recommended that esta j Jshi ns A STOP,.intersections for both ire tions of travel ori San' .Ares*lrao Avehue ,at Monterey” Road will improve a potentially hazar-dou traffic situation, NOW,j THEREFORE, BE IT tSOL"VE;A that the City af, Atscade 'o° direct B': the CitiTaffic _Enginer to.=place and maintain a.pprop�riata signs ,or ;-mark.ings indicating_ intersectibz�s 'at the location' listed abov►e. ` On. motion by and -seeandecl. by. ;the fdiego ng = �Resolvition , is r her + adopted, in" its ,entirety,.=on tae fall owing roll call vote-: . , AYES: NOES: ABSENT r 1 ADOPTED!, ATTEST: a ` > a LEE DAYKA, City., . i ` ,B7'` LTLL Y > yc� APPROVEDAS TE'3 FORM RPR ' ED ,AS TO CNT, ,ENr: z / { �I u . , pity Attorney Lire to of clic e��ks r -Cit: En leer S f �F �t 3 Q E € doIG ;T 1 U� MONTEREY ROAD 5TOF 64 F� r E" REPORT TO .CITY COUNCIL Meeting,Date:, 7/10/S�0 CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item: A-12 Thr Oucrh: Ray Windsor,,, City Manager From: Greg Luke, Director of Public Works, J" 1 Addition 6f Sanitation Service" Charges to, the 194-� 1 ,og* t taxes It °'ia recommended that Council adopt the ,att&ch*4-,.- rezti n and Exhibit upon gompletion of, .the public" heario' City' Ordinance Nb. 181 provides for .th'eall tion, oaf suer service charges on the general County, t.ax `kr i1 1a a atteqied resolution ,, has :ween ,prepared in accordance :with` Sir ca on of the Government' Code to accomplish th:e ;neces ary%��cal:lec.tion thr`ceugh the 3C - 1 proprty, tax bills . Ired "i tion, -a' crt ,c '"Puj:� c . 1 Hearing has been pu s3ished noticing this action., 1�1�C�SSI4N � • The basic` .area of discussion during the public,, hearing is whether or, not -the: property, owner, is tesponsibl*,f.or l.11 ter any, portion ' of= ,the serer charge that is 14..sted under,, the •golumn� erititl'ed "amount" on Exhibit A. Any crdesticns or �onim 'n received during the_public hearing may- be ref6rr.ed to ,,Staff for riiolo.tia-04 .. in order to ensure compli4nce with forward ntr the a proved �."iet .° o the County>Auditor in, a`_timely manner: 1 - 1 , The, City will- bill $570,368.70 in =sanitation services charg*s for fiscal year 1330-91,. Attachments : Resolution- No. 67-90 , Exhibit A RESOLUTION ISO,' '�*-�D k A RESOLT 1,'100 OF THE COUNCIL OFTHE. CITY OF ATASCAI3ERt} P2I�d0 SV'ICE CHEt Thi , BE ADDED TO THE 1990-91 PRO TTAS BI•�L� � � " WHETS Cou}noi l s after ? ► mat c acaorc x 'e` . with, the,•.H*4 t<h .tnd ll Sit . .. Code, hi_tdui holdhworin 'el the. a t,Z r Uez*l has 't: the Go-91 ;p a, � .. and W114M PAS., . .` a d heading the atta.-ch* 'Exhibit' A contal ni .tauch lir . . ae d 1 s v Caurwail ; and Sf, , at Laid I•io hea �.`z� r fic rct t. t *;. 3z f i 111h4 oln c n rote tr '. . 'for protontad. �d tetsz . - ether evi, � `, it� i n ,the �- *ukx is irite est ,that, this Y adopt, the ch reges and, eta mz + t or n i, r the` pre$oftl �d �t`'the hesrin' . t 14 ]WO�, ',at b CAu ref t ^te " z ' of A�.ascadro�,: 'a� f�,l�. e: � Se ir�xt . That the r vital ,i:e't forth let i abdv 3 e true, moz of d alidt a ,. Ecicn Tt 'ol hie aaopt Ther ill charovi, } sit,,f6,tt.h' €ani :thy-a�tt had r which it I'vez` by` a r+� .` z. �a b t, d' . r n 'b r e er r though. hers .f�rlleC. � d Ctuna: he het*rm h:'` confirm . .: h report cont ibit A".v"��nd h eb s nth. dete renin e : d cz , that oach ,anis,:evezy�aorvice. baac + , :set forth. ,In aid reia ,. true ax�d.'a o te' rid. a k, opt d, r S tic h 3, That the char a r. a 's cc f a r** Aon deter 1nod'= .and: ads�'� -� haa + ar .cert • tam : tax` b l 'A c,h per 3 ated: , ' aaa�d,-.x+ ► art , au che.'' .ahai* c,9 le t d , :at,F•the'- a :ti e..a ire .tom nrie- erdi.nary ; st :ad`.v l+ r. t x :a *c+ 7:;llow, ai d are '� t.•" tea th liteaxr: the ' a + ` red� e sale intae. delisgt�cy irded` far. u+�h' tax� Y Section 4 . The City Clerk shall file a certified copy of this resolution and said Exhibit A with the County Auditor upon its adoption . Section S . This resolution is approved by at least a two- thirds vote of said Council . On motion b_v Councilman and seconded by Councilman the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety by the following vote : AYES : NOES : ABSENT : ADOPTED: ATTEST : LEE DAYKA, City Clerk ROBERT B LILLEY , Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT : ARTHER MONTANDON r GREGORY LUKE City Attorney Dir . of Public Works REPORT TO CITY -COUNCIL Meeting Date: 7/10/90 CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item: A,13 Through: Ray Windsor, City Manager, From: Greg< Luke, Director . of Public; Works Sub=s Assessment District No. 3 (Marchant Way) Annual- Assessment Charges to Property Taxes Staff r recommends that Council adopt ;the attached resa]uton authorizing staff to collect assessment charges tbrqugh , the property tax procedures as provided in the Health and Safety Code. '(Resolution o. 57 BAGL%Q= the ' Marchant Way ,property owners petitioned the City" to" farm a sewer assessment ' district due to. septic, problems ass-ociat;ed with the , Cease and Desist , Area. A neighborhood, meeting was held {an- November 187, - , 1985 with City staff, and the prodloct engineer presentingt the boundary options . ' Various boundary alternatives were presented and the current boundary was" chosen; DI:SCUSSIf)Ai To, place the annual assessment charges .onto the property taxes we are required by the County of San Luis Obiapo to pass the attached - ,resolution annually. The fully executed resolution and a listing of properties and assessment *mounta are than forwarded to, the �CountyAuditor-Controller FISCAL IMPACTs' This project was funded through ` the u.se of FmHA- loan money remaining after the new treatment plant was completed. This method. of . financing eras, attractive to . both the ,prgperty; owners and the District ,dueto the low interest rate. District finance and Health " and Safety Code Section 5464 .protide ;for `funding prpects of this type with a 6* cap an the interest rate charged to the property owners. Through , the use of mHA ,mc"nies leaned at '5'% the District' was able to complete the project amid avoid using funds invested at, higher rates than could be charged. Attachments : keso1ution No. Exhibit -A - Special, Assessment Listing. RESOLUTION NO. 87 -90 3 REs .vec�� ° u �y�; OF THE CITY,,car ATASCADERQ PLACING 'THE ANNUAL PAYMME ` Fit ASSES " PISITRICT NO. (MARCHANT` WAY)` ON, THE 0PE T• ,T XEs FOR.,,. 9Q-w91', SCAL "YEAR i WHEREAS. Improvement Distrit,t Nca. 3 was form,0d �6y Resolution 3-' 86 of the, Atasoaderc County Sanitation Board •7aary 13; 1986; and a WI EA ;- Ir rav nt -DistrietlNloil 3 -waa annex* in the Ataecade rca ;' County, San tatican= Y District by Resolution the Board on �,arr�xar� 15,:'.1 8 ;°" nd WEAS,,- the Atascac era County San .tat 6T District .has` subsequerntly been ditsvlved,`' and WHEMS . the City .c,f`. ,t+ sc derc hie . e" ,rlaed the .f sr. " I3istrict into the Wast+a +ater I�ivisa on'` caf` thy Baps dent" af Public Works, giwingr the eity `Cc n it "ai11 of, t,hw power, - x;m—d fiscall respcansibilities of ,the` f +rmer, biatrr 3.1 c NOW. .' T ORL- BE IT RESOLVED Jby.thy, "Council cif tea cl of Atascadero as fool Sectican .: The abc * recitals are "true and-.ccarrct t. : Section The sdt ption of th*s resp luta n author" the c�allecti6n f the a�eaassman . for' t i+ ��.a�ca�l ti' cor+ n�snc nq " tin the lW dna; ot, ; u y 3 and ►r dirq on` h,4-- otb day of. ". 'pane, 1991 listed' on �atts."ad Exhibit `A. w Section 3.-, The ese rsi ertt has been dets�iod° to �r $4150,60 per , -parcel to be paid at an inter ni: `rete of year - fcar a term of" 1.5` years., said yearly,, ax'sestw ei t ;te- $428.00 Sectioh �b i,ty la rk ": hereby airdered and d.,r*ic* It to file. 8 c ort i f i eta . +ropy cif." "the. d aar;�rrz-as nd; ansa a �r�t; x�+� with the. County' Auditor = tbqwtbor 4ith "a pertitiid,, this 'Resolution upon its,:Adoption: SeCtinn`" 5. The,;City 'Clark.. is" hereby further, ordersk .. A directod to fila a certi:fiod of 1h+e asa+ae t 'droll zi0i, h the county- TaX C611t rg4t,h*r'with a" certa fi*d Of this Rex 6lution tlpon itx adoption, Ort xciti carr bycruac 3 ►n and:se " Counc i lm t`h f of lai rc re ol;utioez . i s adopted < art its enfi;retir by, the fbi to tin n rca 1 ca 11 vote: AYES : NOES : ABSENT : DATE: ATTEST : LEE DAYKA, City Clerk ROBERT B. LILLEY, Mayor Approved as to Form: Approved as to Content : ARTHER MONTANDON GREGORY LUKE City Attorney Director of Public Works tiU ND Min 'n •... C UO L WF N O • � it Or � c1w # m N W VIJ C %.n "> T O O O O U U U a rrb 1 M w w w w w W w w in 73 O W W W W W W W W N D 11 CD OD S CC OD W cu co N N ;n Y + N S N O O O O O O O O N D N P Vl .n W .F W .-t 7n in N .A W r P N O V fll n N � _ .L'. C M —1 z -1 D N � O O O O D V W W W w W W w w N N in W W W W W W W W N co w CD W .'p 01 CD OD + . . m 0 0 �� c� n v o o z P v� ui vl -P w r G .� N .0 W r o• N 0 V N 70 Z r n in� � T 3.. p p m p - O O O O Q d o 73m r N r Wo va M -- — — — m nn T DC rz � Y< 'n. .0 N a In o N-4 W r w w w w w w in 1� M.A. I- r r r r r r .o NK + . • . v D r N W -: W W W W ` w w N SL9 m -:. co OD m CD m W N m-C r r r r H r r m ZN O G O O O O O N NT P V� V1 4' W N O 3 :t r VI N V P O .O In - z W W w W W W W N r r r r r r H N m OD :D m CD m m W N P U1 Vn 41 W r Vi N V- P O .o n O Q W r t n o 10 O D n of 0 REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL Meeting Date: 7/10/90 CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item: A-14 Through : Ray Windsor, City Manager From Greg Luke, Director of Public Works SUBJECT Assessment District #4 (Seperado-Cayucos) Annual Payment RECOMMENDATION• Staff recommends that Council adopt the attached resolution authorizing the placement of the annual assessment charge for Assessment District #4 on the property taxes for Fiscal Year 1990- 91 . (Resolution No. 86-90) ; BACKGROUND: Assessment District #4 was formed pursuant to the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 and bonds issued under the provisions of the Bond Act of 1915 . The bonds have been issued to represent unpaid assessments and the payment terms have been set . Repayment will be over a period of 20 years at an average interest rate of 7. 306% . There was a period established for the payment of the assessment prior to the market of the bonds and approximately '14% of the property owners paid at that time The remaining assessments were marketed by Security Pacific Marketing This charge represents the third installment on the payment of the bonds . FISCAL> IMPACT: Project costs to be assessed were paid 100% by the bonds issued. City ' participation items will be reimbursed as additional properties annex into this Improvement District Attachments : Resolution No. 86 -90 Exhibit A - Special Assessment Listing RESOLUTION NO.86-90 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO PLACING THE ANNUAL PAYMENT FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO 4 (SEPERADO-CAYUCOS) ON THE PROPERTY TAXES FOR THE 1990-91FISCAL YEAR WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Atascadero adopted Resolution 70-86 declaring its intention to undertake proceedings pursuant to the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 and issue bonds in said proceedings under the provisions of the Improvement Bond Act of 1915 for the construction of public improvements known as "City of Atascadero Improvement District No. 4 (Seperado-Cayuc os) " ; and WHEREAS, the City Clerk has filed' in the office of the San Luis Obispo County Recorder a: notice of assessment` and said assessment has become a, lien upon the land on which it was levied; all pursuant to the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Atascadero, as follows : Section 1`. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and this Council so finds and determines Section 2 , Serial Bonds representing unpaid assessments have been issued in the manner provided by Division 10 of the Streets and Highways Code and the Improvement Bond Act of 1915 . Section 3. The adoption of this resolution authorizes' the collection of the assessment for the _ fiscal year commencing on theist day of July 1990 and ending on the 30th day of -June, 1993 , said assessments as listed on attached Exhibit A. Section 4 The City Clerk is hereby ordered and directed to file a certified copy of the assessment roll with the County Auditor, together with a certified copy of this Resolution upon its adoption. Section 5 . The City Clerk is hereby further ordered and directed to fide a certified copy of the assessment roll with the County` Tax Collector, together with a-certified copy of this Resolution upon its adoption. On motion by Councilman and seconded by Councilman the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following vote : AYES: NOES : ABSENT : ADOPTED: ATTEST : LEE DAYKA, City Clerk ROBERT B. LILLEY, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT : ARTHER MONTANDON GREG LUKE City Attorney Dir , of Public Works EXHIBIT A TO ITEM A-14 CITY Of ATASWSO-IMPROVEMENT 3ISTRICT NO. 4 1990 ASSESSORS 1991 NUMBER Asseswwnt 28-071-12-OCO 337.50 28-161-15.000 337.50 28.161.14.000 337.50 28-161.07-000 0.00 28.161-06-000 337.50 28.161.22.000 337.50 28-161-21-000 337.50 28.161.03.000 337.50 -- 28-161-01-000 337.50 28-292-05.000 337.50 28.152.40-000 337.50 28-152-42.000 337.50 28.152.44-000 337.50 28-152.15.000 337.50 28-152-43.000 337.50 28.152.16-000 0.00 28.152-66-000 337.50 28-152.49-000 337.50 28.152-65.000 337.50 28-152-50-000 337.50 28.152-67.000 337.50 28.152.19-000 337.50 28.152.20.000 337.50 28.152-55.000 337.50 28.152.60.000 337.50 28-152.56.000 337.50 28.152.06-000 337.50 28-152-07.000 337.50 28.152.24.000 337.50 28.152.08.000 337.50 28.152.45-000 337.50 28-'52-09.000 337.50 28.152-46-000 337.50 28.152.10.000 337.50 28.152.62-000 337.50 28-152-11.000 337.50 28.152.64.000 674.99 28.152-29.000 337.50 28.152-30-000 337.50 28-152-69.00C 337.50 28-152.48-000 337.50 28.152-68.000 337.50 18-1�1.52•UOQ 8.00 28-152-51.000 337.50 28-1fi2-13-000 33i.5O 28.151-46.000 337.50 28.151.45.000 337.50 28-151.26.000 337.50 28.151.25.000 337.50 28.151-58-000 337.50 28.151-24.000 337.50 28-151-59-000 337.50 28.151.23.000 337.50 28.151-43-000 337.50 28.151-42.000 337.50 28.151-50.000 674.99 REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL- Meeting Date: 7/10190 CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item: A-15 Through Ray Windsor, City Manager From: Greg Luke, Directorof Public Works SUBJECT: Assessment District #5 - Annual Payment RECOMMENDATION• Staff recommends that Council adopt Resolution No . 85-90 for the placement of the annual assessment charge for Assessment District No. 5 on the propertytaxes for Fiscal Year 1990-91 . BACKGROUND: Assessment District No . 5 (Chandler Ranch) was formed in 1988 at the request of the property owners . The intent of the District was to improve the roads to a standard acceptable to the City and to offer said roads for acceptance into the city-maintained mileage. A resolution accomplishing this is included in the agenda package for -this< meeting P There was a period established for payment of the assessment prior to the marketing of bonds and approximately 30% of the property owners paid at that time. The remaining 'assessments were 'marketed>by Security Pacific Marketing. This charge represents the second installment on the payment of these bonds . FISCAL IMPACT• Project costs will be paid 100% by the cash payment of assessments and the bonds marketed. RESOLUTION NO. 85--90 RESOLUTION OF 'THE' COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO PLACING THE ANNUAL PAYMENT FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 5 (CHANDLER RANCH) ON THE PROPERTY TAXES FOR THE 1990-91 FISCAL YEAR WHEREAS, Assessment District No . 5 was initiated by the property owners for the purpose of improving their roads to a standard acceptable to the City of Atascadero; and. WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Atascadero adopted Resolution 92-88 declaring its intention to undertake proceedings pursuant to the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 and to issue bonds in said proceedingsunder the provisions of the Improvement Bond Act of 1915 , for the construction of improvements knows as " City of Atascadero Assessment District No. 5 (Chandler Ranch) ; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Atascadero, as follows : Section 1 . The foregoing recitals are true an correct and :this Council so finds and determines . Section 2 . Notices were mailed to each person owning property in the City of Atascadero Assessment District #5 (Chandler Ranch) , at ' his/her last known address as it appears on the tax rolls of the County :of San Luis 'Obispo, said statement containing a designation of the property assessed, the amount of the assessment , the date of the recordation of the assessment , the gime and place of payment of , the assessment and the effect of failure to pay within such time, and a statement that bonds would be issued under the Improvement Bond Act of 1915 to represent unpaid assessments . Section 3. Notices were mailed and published stating that all sums assessed were:due and payable immediately, that the payment of sums is to be made to the Treasurer of the City within 30 days after the date of recording the assessment and that if any assessments were not paid within the 30 day period, bonds would be issued under the Improvement Bond Act of 1915 to represent unpaid assessments . Section 4 . Serial Bonds representing unpaid assessments have been issued in the manner provided by Division 10 of the Streets and Highways Code and the Improvement Bond Act of 1915 . Section 5 . The adoption of this resolution authorizes collection of the assessment for the fiscal year commencing on the 1st day of July 1990 and ending on the 30th day of June, 1991 , said assessments as listed on the attached Exhibit A. Section 6 . The City Clerk is hereby ordered and directed to file a certified copy of the assessment roll with the County Auditor , together with a certified copy of this Resolution upon its adoption . Section 7 . The City Clerk is hereby further ordered and directed to file a certified copy of the assessment roll with the County Tax Collector, together with a certified copy of this Resolution upon its adoption . On motion by Councilman and seconded by Councilman the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following vote : AYES : NOES : ABSENT : ADOPTED: ATTEST : LEE DAYKA, City Clerk ROBERT LILLEY , Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT ARTHER MONTANDON GREG L . LUKE City Attorney Dir , of Public Works • Y f -1 V ..n mrn — r» WF O •\ •• U.r Uw co N LI .. Irl 1nc� r T u O U O O O O O U U tJ O U U O O C> m 1 1n 1n 1n to 1n to 1n 1n vl 17I Ni JI In VI 1n 1n 1n m n ti N N N N N N N N In a r r O G O O ; f W w W W W W In In N .+f r. 1-'• N N N + Y .+ 1•- ✓ m A N D O D O O O O O O O G O o O O U O O In O 1n r. w a> 1n w m 0 z o � 1 n s a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p o 0 :�, o o p o 0 o p n r VI VI VI 1n 1n UI VI V1 VI VI 1n V1 VI J1 vl V1 1n In m P P P P P P P CP r r f f r r r r In v m N N N N N N N N N ✓ r O O O O r ; W W W W W W In m O O U O O O O G O O U U U O O O O Z -J W r+ OD ul VI W r •' VI W W CG Vi W r r h 'OD 02 A m D C T 0 2 C O '.In Dp ;o NtP G r In < r wv < In m a r.o A DC rz •-1 D D{ T d ti U O O O U O O G O O O O O O O G o m 1n .n 1n 1n 1n 'A .n 1n vl 1n 1n 1n w 1n vl .n 1n In \ m,. P P P P P P P P P r f r r ; r f f •D cnx N N N N N N N In r ►� r O O O f r ; W W W W W to m{ N 1 O O O O O p O O O O G O Ci O O O O In c w- N r. o O O O G W W N r W W W N CJ r N O V W r Oo W P r 1n N P f N 1n m m 2 ti U O O O O O O O O O G O O J p O U D V1 J1 VI JI VI VI V1 VI VI 171 VI VI VI V1 VI VI 171 N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . n N N N N In r r+ r O G O f r f W W W W W N m O O O O O U O O U O G OO O O Z O N •" r'• O O N O O W W N f w W W W N ti O f N O V W ; W W P r vl N P O G W 1 r A O n � m w mm 0 w a ti V -10 MD ..yp Tm 2,n tTI T:n V m C O� mr a N.O W Nd J� V1l) VI V1C) r l7 1 U O O O U O O O U O G O O O O G O m 1 � ut ut ut ut ut w ut ut ut u, v. v, u, ut ut iJi m •' P P P P 0 P P P P P P P P P P P P Y N a OD v V .I v V v P P P r y N i"1 N 7 U O O O O O O O O O O O G G b O O :q 0 O T r U OU nl O O O r r O u C1 O O U N �{ X r m P r v ao r ut N o 0 1 ti 1 f� n S x D p O p r O J O O O O U O O O O O O O O O C D r m VI VI ut ut ut V1 VI VI VI V1 VI VI Vt V. Ut UI ut N T A P P O' P P P P P P P P P P P P P P C, A m r i i i 4- 01 d O m v V V v V •V P P PN .•' r N r r r t T !7 O U O 6 O O O O O O O U O O O U Z •, r ® P l U co r VI N O v VI W P r N r ' N �D mw A` Y m n m T z rr x rr_ Y' a r` O N 0 O �y A Z . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .n A Z )>a a O A AfA A AO) ti r Wu r 4ov m vo < m < m m _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ T CnU Y0 A D rz .0 N O nisi O O O O O O O O O O U J O O O O O in •1 \ mD ut VI ut Ut VI N P ut ut ut ut to Vi ut VI ut ut IT \ mY .D V,XP P P P P P O, O• P P 0• P P P P P P O In r V X r r r r 4- F r .P .r r r r r r r w r Sv, T< .D .0 z .0 10 OD m 6 v P P r N T< N r r r .. ► r r N .+ r ✓ r .+ r in Z N Nin win N oln O O U O O O G O O O O O C n O C'. w Nm r O O O O O O O O r O O O J O O N 3 3 W .D Z •1 VI VI VI VI VI VI Vf N VI V1 VI VI V1 VI In VI VI N P P P P P J O• P P P P P P P O• P P y m i r i s i i i i i i s i 41 + i i r w 14 •" r' •" r N .� r r r f m O O O O O O O O O O O O O O U O U f1 W .p OV vpi O Jp W W .+ S P rD O VGi W N n O r r 9 O p W W 1 1 � A r n n .0 2 0 a F C1 ti v s y m m 0' P o ,o H D Z-1 MIT, c v0 ms w a cy Z w Vlr` m o 0 0 0 0 o u o In m In to V, 1n 1n in VI to rn A P P P P P P P C^ D O VI kn r i r r r rn n T � O `D a a a .D N G1 N N •' ✓ rn n y N D N O G1 O t1 O 7 O n N O N •J Cl N N N N N T m x O O J v W n 7 J m A H Z O N -4 rll t m = n_ =I Ce o 0 o v o n 0 0 o a r P P P P P P P P N 7J rn s r i i -t- o 0 0 .o a a a N N r r S rn O O O O O O O O 2 O O N N N N N -1 CD P .D v IA W 9 r N .o n FZ m n m r = rr a ..c F Gf O Nrn DO 'O F[c r c, r wv vo 7J DC r; o a< T N O O U o O J o O U m U M> VI V, N U vi >r N vl m ma P P P P P O + xcn VI VI r r r r r r N 3N N m< r m N N I,-1 v,I n 2 o a o In u o n v n V1 VI V1 UI VI Vr VI V1 N T P P P P P P V w O O .O ✓ ram .O r .O N N N N • h' S m O U O O O O O D O O W N N N N -I O y U W P r N P n v 0 w In u r a A �l 1J n nI m r P r .1 rl ATTACHMENT TO RESOLUTION 85-90 ITEM A-15 CITY OF ATASCADERO page I of 3 IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 5 LIMITER OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS (CHANDLER RANCH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) ASSESSOR'S 1990-91 PARCEL NUMBER ASSESSMENT --------------------------- 54-231-3I 485.45 54-231-32 485.45 54-231-33 485.45 54.231-34 485.45 54-231-35 485.45 54-231-36 485.45 485.45 54-231.38 485.45 54-231-42 485.45 54-231-43 485.45 54.241-10 485.43 54-241-25 485.45 54-241-28 485.45 485.45 54-241-34 485.45 54-241-35 485.45 56-241-36 485.45 5fi-402-01 485.45 56-402-03 485.45 56-402.04 485.45 485.45 56-402-08 485.45 56-402-13 485.45 56-402-14 485.45 56-402-15 485.45 56.411-03 485.45 485.45 56-411-05 485.45 55-411-07 485.45 56-411-08 485.45 56-411-10 485.45 56-411.11 485.45 56-411-I2 485.45 485.45 56.411-13 485.45 56-411-14 485.45 56-411-17 485.45 56-411-20 485.45 56-411-21 485.45 485.45 56-411-22 485.45 i MCIT'( OF ATASCAGERO page �l IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 5 LIMITED OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT 3CNDS (CHANCLER RANCH ASSESSMENT CISTRICT) ASSESSOR'S 1990-91 PARCEL NUMBER ASSE33JIMENT --------------------------- 56-461-02 485.45 56-461.03 485.45 56-461-04 485.45 56-461-05 485.45 56-461-06 485.45 56-471-0I 485.45 485.45 56-471-03 485.45 56-471-04 485.45 56.471-05 485.45 56-471-06 485.45 56-471-07 485.45 58.471-08 485.45 485.45 56-471.10 485.45 56-471-11 485.45 56-471-12 485.45 56-472-03 485.45 56-472-05 485.45 485.45 56-481-03 485.45 56-481-04 485.45 56-481-05 485.45 56-481-07 485.45 56-481-08 485.45 56-481-49 485.45 485.45 56-481-110 485.45 S6-491.01 485.45 56-491-04 485.45 56-491-05 485.45 56-491-06 485.45 56-491-07 485.45 485.45 56-491-08 485.45 56-491-09 485.45 56-49I-11 485.45 56-491-I3 485.45 56.491-14 485.45 485.45 56-491-16 485.45 -_ CITY OF ATASCAOERO ?a3= 3 of 3 IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 5 LIMITEO OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS (CHANDLER RANCH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT; ASSESSOR'S 1990-91 PARCEL NUMBER ASSESSMENT --------------------------- 56-491-20 485.45 56-491-22 485.45 56-491-23 485.45 56-491-24 485.45 56-491-25 485.45 56-491-26 485.45 56-491-27 485.45 56-491-28 485.45 56-491-29 485.45 56-491-30 485.45 . 56-30246 485.45 485.45- 56-302-07 485.45 56-502-08 485.45 56-502-09 485.45 REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL CITY OF ATASCADER0 Agenda Item: A-16 Through: Ray ~Windsor, City Manager Meeting Date: 745 0-1-- - 7/10/90 -F 7/10/90 From: Greg L. Luke, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: -Approval"to Award the Sycamore Road Bridge Replacement Project RECOM4ENDATION: 1. Adopt resolution 92-90 authorizing the following: The execution of an agreementwith R. Burke Corporation of San Luis Obispo for the construction of Sycamore Road Bridge at Atascadero Creek. BACKGROUND: On July 5 1990 the bids for the Sycamore Road Bridge Replacement project were opened with the following results. R. Burke Corporation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 505,808. 00 Madonna Construction Company . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 521,295. 00 Nick E. Pokrajac, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $. 664,559.40 Engineer's Estimate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 535,450. 00 I DISCUSSION: The first and second low bidders are within a reasonable range for this project. Both of these bids are below the Engineer's estimate. Both of these firms are qualified and capable of completing the ;work according to the Plans and Specifications. FISCAL IMPACT: Construction Cost Low Bid .. . ... . . . . . . . . $ 505,808.00 Federal/State Share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $` 404, 646.40 City _Share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 101,161. 60 Contract Bridge Inspector Cost .. . .. . ../- $ 70,000.00 Limit to Federal/State Share . . $ 75, 871.20 City Share . . . . . . . . . . 0 • t. • • � miscellaneous tend Additional City Casts Surveying . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 5,00€7 Consultant Materials Testing +/- $` 5,000 _ State Mat,,eria ,s Testing . . . . ... . . . . $ 3,000 Geotechnical Consultant . . . . . . . . .. 0Q0 Structural Consultant . . . . ♦ . . • . . .,.. . t 3 0.00 - City Staff f . . . . . . • . • •. • . • . • t . • •:• n�t',�'e ii.��r,ni �9.4 Contingency (10%) 54000 Deposit with State-,Pr or t03 Award ..... . . � : �.pl„I#>l.X10 The costs listed above are estimates based ,on Us. tngineer's , " estimate of the construction casts. "+/y" indicates, relatively uncertain estimates. Representations of Pedetal/State and City' share may change according to the administration pro dur s specified in the,>~' dera"l legislation authorizing ,the grantfunds.. ; Eaclosv es.:' 1. Proposed Resolution of the 'City Council''of Ataacadero authorizing the exe'cutIon of an y` agreement with R. Burke CorporAtidn.. f 1 RESOLUTION NO. 92-90 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH R. Burke Corporation TO construct the Sycamore Road Bridge at Atascadero Creek The City Council of the City of Atascadero, California, hereby resolves as follows: 1. The Mayor, or in the Mayor' s absence, the City Manager, is hereby authorized to execute an agreement with: R. Burke Corporation, P.O. Box 957, San Luis Obispo, CA 93406 to construct the Sycamore Road Bridge at Atascadero Creek, and all other agreements or documents required to effectuate the terms of agreement. 2. The City Manager is hereby authorized to make minor corrections or modifications of a mathematical or clerical nature. 3. The Finance Director is hereby authorized to: appropriate funds, if necessary; release and expend funds; and issue warrants to comply with the terms of this agreement. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a special meeting of the City Council of the City of Atascadero held on the 5th day ofJuly, 1990. CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA By Robert B. Lilley, Mayor ATTEST: Lee Dayka, City Clerk MEETING AGENDA RESOLUTION 97-90 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO APPROVING A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF ATASCADERO AND LOCAL 817 SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNIT ATASCADERO CHAPTER GENERAL SERVICES BARGAINING UNIT WHEREAS, the City of Atascadero has met and conferred in good faith with Local 817 Service Employees International Unit (S.E . I .U. ) Atascadero Chapter General Services Bargaining Unit for the purpose of discussing wages, benefits , and other conditions of employment ; and WHEREAS, the City of Atascadero and the Atascadero Chapter General Services Bargaining Unit have reached an agreement regarding said wages, benefits, and other conditions of employment for the term of Fiscal Years 1990/91 , 1991/92 and 1992/93; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Atascadero City Council hereby approves the Memorandum of Understanding between the City and Local 817 Service Employees International Union Atascadero Chapter General Services Bargaining Unit for Fiscal Years 1990/91 , 1991/92 and 1992/93, and authorizes the City Manager , as the Employee Relations Officer , to enter into said agreement on behalf of the City . On motion by Counciiperson and seconded by Councilperson the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ADOPTED: ATTEST: i LEE DAYK,A, City Clerk ROBERT LILLE`l, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: ARTHER MONTANDON, City Attorney RAY WINDSOR, City Manager i I i I i • MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BAND ERS ANDING BETWEEN CITY OF ATASCADERO AND LOCAL 817 SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION ATASCADERO CHAPTER GENERAL SERVICES BARGAINING UNIT This Memorandum of Understanding is entered into between the Employee Relations Officer of the City of Atascadero, hereinafter referred to as "City," and the Local 817 Service Employees International Union, Atascadero Chapter General Services Bargaining Unit, hereinafter referred to as "Union," and made pursuant to California Government Code Sections 3500 et seq., City of Atascadero Municipal Code, Title 2, Chapter 2, Section 2-2.01 through Section 2-2.13, inclusive, and the City of Atascadero Resolution No. 12-80,dated July 14, 1980 and subsequent amendments thereto. The parties have met and conferred in good faith regarding employment terms and conditions for members of the Unit as recognized by the City of Atascadero on April 12, 1982, and, having reached an agreement, as herein set forth, submit this memorandum to the City Council with a joint recommendation that the Council resolve to adopt the terms and conditions and take such other additional actions as may be necessary to implement its provisions. Section 1.0 Purpose. It is the purpose of the Memorandum of Understanding, hereinafter referred to as "MOU," to promote and provide for continuity of operation in employment through harmonious relations,cooperation and understanding between Management and employees covered by the provisions of this MQU and to set forth the understanding reached between the parties as a result of good faith negotiations on matters set forth herein. Section 2.0 Full Understanding, Modifications and Waiver. 2.1 This MQU sets forth the full and entire understanding of the parties regarding the matters set forth herein. Any other prior or existing understanding or agreement by the parties,whether formal or informal, regarding any such matters, are hereby suspended or terminated in their entirety, if in conflict with this Memorandum. 2.2 No agreement, alteration, understanding, variation, waiver or modification of any of the terms or provisions contained herein shall in any manner be binding upon the parties hereto unless made and executed in writing by both parties hereto and, if required, approved and implemented by the City Council. 2.3 The waiver of any breach,term or condition of this Agreement by either party shall not constitute a precedent in the future enforcement of all its terms and conditions. S.E.I.U. General Services Unit Section 3.0 Vacation and Holidays. 3.1 Vacation leave shall be credited, computed and used as specified by Section 9.0, Employee Benefits, of Resolution No.12-80, dated July 14, 1980. 3.2 It is agreed and understood that the taking of vacation shall be as scheduled by the Department Head subject to the needs of the City. 3.3 Employees transferring from the County shall use their county hire date to determine their vacation accrual entitlement. 3.4 Holidays shall be observed in accordance with Section 9.4, Employees Benefits, of Resolution No. 12-80 dated July 14,1980, and Resolution No. 52-82, Section 5, Subparagraph K dated November 8, 1982. 3.5 Floating holidays, as provided for in sub-section 3.4 above, may be used any time after January 1st of each year. 3.6 December 24, 1990, shall be observed as a holiday. 3.7 Martin Luther King's Birthday shall be observed as a holiday for employees in January 1992. 3.8 Employees who work on a City holiday shall be paid time and one-half(11/2) their base hourly rate for the hours worked on the holiday, plus compensation for the holiday as provided in sub-section 3.4 above. Section 4.0 Salaries and Health Insurance. 4.1 Salaries 4.1.1 Effective the first day of the first full pay period in July 1990, salaries in effect on June 30, 1990 shall be increased by five percent(5%). 4.1.2 Effective the fust day of the first full pay period in July 1991, employees shall receive a salary increase which shall be determined by the Los Angeles/Anahiem/ Riverside, Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers, May to May (printed by the BLS on about June 20, 1991), Consumer Price Index. The salary increase shall equal the full percentage change of the CPI W up to five percent(501o)plus one-half of the full percentage change above five percent(5%). EXAMPLE: Assume the CPI-W= 6.6% �.��ath-cif-thedollare�s-axed-i�thia�$aa�ple�s-aa�ses� �� Therefore, full CPI-W up to 5% +1/2 of CPI-W over 5% is: 5% +0.8% [6.6-5.0 = 1.6, (1.6)/2 = 0.81 = 5.8% D ' 4.1.3 Effective the fust day of the fims fiall pay pei4ed July ;�62, employees shall receive a salary increase which shall be determined by the formula detailed in 4.1.2 above but with appropriate effective dates. Page 2 S.E.I.U. General Services Unit 4.2 Salary Administration 4.2.1 Newly hired employees shall normally be placed at Step A. Advanced step hiring may be approved by the City Manager. 4.2.2 Movement between steps shall be at twelve month intervals and subject to satisfactory performance. The initial step movement after hiring, however,shall be after twelve months or after completion of probation,whichever occurs later. 43 Special Adjustments. In addition to increases provided above, the City shall make special range adjustments on the first day of the first full pay period in the month listed below: 4.3.1 Custodian: Reclassify to Maintenance Worker I July 1990. Tt)(Ar 4.3.2 10% spread between Maintenance Worker II and Maintenance Leadworker, July 1990., /yy� 4.3.3 Building Inspector: 5%July 1990. 4.4 Health Insurance. 4.4.1 The City shall continue to provide the current medical and dental benefits. 4.4.2 The Medical Insurance Committee may recommend changes in the level of service and service providers to the City during the term of the agreement. 4.4.3 During the term of this MOU,the City shall continue to make the contribution it was making effective June 30, 1990, plus it shall pay 100% of employee only cost • increases, and 50% of dependent cost increases. If the increase cost for dependent coverage exceeds thirty-five (35%) percent in any one year during the term of this MOU the employee shall:pay that portion in excess of thirty-five(35%)percent. 4.4.4 For those employees without dependents or who do not choose to enroll their dependents in the City sponsored medical and dental plan, the amount of the City contribution shall be paid to the employee as an addition to his/her regular pay. 4.5 Vision Insurance During the term of this MOU, the City shall continue to provide employee only vision insurance at no cost to the employee. Section 5.0 Union Security 5.1 .1 Dues Deductions. The City and Union agree that requests for, changes in, and cancellations of union dues and other deductions shall be promptly processed through the Finance Department and put into effect at the employee's request. Deductions shall be made from each paycheck and remitted to the Union monthly. Requests for deductions shall be made by City-approved authorization cards in accordance with applicable State law. The City will process changes in the amount of Union dues as often as once every three months. Dues deduction amounts may vary between employees. The City will notify the Union of all changes in deduction monthly. 5.1 .2 Maintenance of Membership. • Any employee on dues deductions as provided in 5.1 .1 above on the effective date of this MOU and any employee who commences such dues deductions during the Page 3 S.E.LU. General Services Unit term of this MOU, shall continue such dues deduction for the balance of the term of the MOU, unless such employee gives the proper notification to the Union to withdraw from dues deduction during the month of March of any year during this MOU. 5.1.3 Union shall indemnify and save harmless the City of Atascadero, its officers, agents, and employees from any and all claims , demands , damages, costs , expenses, or liability arising out of Section 5. 5.2 Union Access. A) The City agrees that an authorize union staff member may be granted access to a work location to participate in investigation and processing of grievances per the grievance procedure or to observe working conditions, when and to the extent necessary, and only if it will in no event adversely affect the operational, security or safety requirements of the city, upon the approval of the Employee Relations Officer or his/her designee. B) The Union shall provide the Employee Relations Officer with a list of all authorized staff representatives, and the list shall be kept current by the Union. C) When and to the extent necessary and only if it will in no event adversely affect the operational,security or safety requirements of the City and upon notification and approval of the Employee Relations Officer or his/her designee, an authorized union staff member isrmitted to communicate with employee(s) and/or union steward(s) on official City time without said employee(s)and/or union steward(s) loss of compensation. It is not the intent of this section to allow general union meetings on City time; but rather to allow investigation and discussion of working conditions, grievances and safety issues. D) It is understood that every reasonable effort shall be made to perform the above activities on off-duty time. E) The City will allow the use of existing bulletin board space. Bulletin board space shall be used only for the following subjects: 1) Local 817 recreational information, social and related news bulletins; 2) scheduled meetings; 3) information concerning elections or results thereof; and 4) reports of official business of Local 817. Prior to posting items shall be initialed by an authorized representative of the Union and City. All outdated materials must be removed by the Union. 5.3 Union Stewards. A) The City authorizes the unit to appoint three (3) "union stewards", any one of which may represent an employee subject to the City's grievance procedure. B) The Union shall provide the employee Relations Officer with a list of all authorized union stewards,and the list shall be kept current. C) An employee and/or his/her "union steward" representative may, when and to the extent necessary,take official City time without loss of compensation in order to participate in the investigation and processing of a grievance, upon notification and approval of the Employee Relations Officer or his/her designee. D) The Employee Relations Officer will approve employee and/or union steward Page 4 S.E.LU. General Services Unit . taking official time to investigate and process a grievance when and to the extent necessary and only if it will in no event adversely affect the operational, security or safety requirements of the City. E) It is understood that the employee and or union steward shall make every reasonable effort to perform the above activities on off duty time. Section 6.0 Contracting out. The City will give reasonable notice to the Union if it intends to contract out the functions currently performed by employees within the Unit. Upon request, the City will meet with the Union to explain the reason for the decision to contract out and to solicit Union views on the proposal. Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the rights of the City Council to contract out work in its sole discretion. Section 7.0 Term Life Insurance. 7.1 City shall maintain a term life insurance policy for each unit member in a total amount of Twenty Thousand dollars ($20,000.00). City shall pay all premiums for such policy during the term of this MOU. 7.2 The City shall maintain a term life insurance policy for each dependent of each unit member in a total amount of One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00)per dependent and shall pay all premiums for such policy during the term of this Agreement. 7.3 For those ernployees without dependents or who do not choose to enroll their depen- dents in the City sponsored life plan, the amt of the City oontrExtion shall be paid as Section 8.0 General Benefits, an aeon to his/her regular pay. fit/• 8.1 It is agreed that overtime, compensatory time off(CTO), retirement, leaves and other benefits and conditions of employment shall be as specified by City Resolutions No. 12 -80, 31-31 and 52-82 and Atascadero Municipal Codes, 'title 2, Chapter 2, inclusive. Pregnancy leave shall be provided in accordance with State Law. 8.2 Employees assigned standby duty shall receive Twenty-five Dollars($25.00)for each day of standby duty. Employees called back to work shall receive a minimum of two hours pay at straight time. Employees working in excess of two hours once called back shall receive time and one-half pay for hours worked in excess of two hours. 8.3 Uniforms. The City shall provide uniforms to Unit employees and replace them on an as needed basis. Jackets will be included as a part of the uniform provided. 8.4 The City agrees to add grandparents to the list of family members for whom the employee is allowed to take bereavement leave. 8.5 Work Shoes. During the term of this MOU, the City shall contribute a fixed amount each year to each maintenance employee for the purchase of work shoes. Proof of purchase is required. Once purchased, such work shoes must be worn while working. The City contribution shall be: 8.5.1 1990-91 -- $90.00. Page 5 S.E.I.U. General Services Unit 8.5.2 1991-92 -- . $9(?00 8.5.3 1992-93 -- $100.00. 8.6 Sick Leave for Dependent Care. A regular employee may use sick leave for the care of relatives who are ill, injured or pregnant and who are living in the employee's household. 8.7 Pay on Promotion. An employee who is promoted shall receive a salary increase of at least one step (5%). Therefore,the employee shall be placed on step"A",or that step which produces at least a one step salary increase. Section 9.0 Probationary Period. The probationary period for newly hired employees shall be twelve months. The probationary period for employees promoted to a higher classification shall be six months in the new classification. The City shall have the option of granting a newly hired employee regular status at any time after nine(9)months of service. Section 10.0 Rest Periods. Any employee required to work more than 16 hours within a twenty -four hour period shall be entitled to an eight hour rest period prior to returning to work. If any portion of the eight hour rest period occurs during the employees' regularly scheduled work hours, the employee shall receive normal compensation for that time. This section shall not apply in the case of emergencies. Section 11.0 Shift Changes. The City shall give employees reasonable notice of routine shift changes. Emergency shift changes shall be made on an as needed basis. Section 12.0 PatchingTaving Rork. The City shall make a reasonable attempt to schedule patching work during days/timeswhen temperatures are not expected to exceed 100 degrees. It is mutually understood that employees working with paving contractors must adhere to the contractors work schedules. Section 13.0 State Disability Insurance. 13.1 City shall continue to provide State Disability Insurance as an employee cost through payroll deduction. 13.2 State Disability Insurance shall be integrated with sick heave with the objective of providing full compensation. • Page 6 S.E.I.U. General Services Unit Section 14.0 Work Gloves. 14.1 City shall continue to�^rovide employees with leather palmed work gloves. City hl r� '14.2 The Pure-WaAs Depa tawnt shall issue regulations establishing reasonable standards for provision of the gloves, replacement of gloves, and the maximum number of gloves made available during any fiscal year. Section 15.0 Retirement The City shall amend the Retirement system to provide Post Reirement Survirors Benefit effective July, 1991. Section 16.0 Personnel Rules and Regulations The parties agree to meet on the implementation of new Personnel Rules and Regulations. The meetings will include all interested Employee Organizations in the City, however the Union reserves its right to maintain an independent position(s)on the proposed changes. Section 17.0 Grievance Procedure. Employees shall be entitled to utilize the grievance procedure as outlined in Section 6.0 of Resolution No. 12-50. Section 19.0 Management Rights. The authority of the City includes, but is not limited to the exclusive right to determine the mission of its constituent departments, commissions and boards; set standards of service; and promotion, direct its employees; take disciplinary action for "just cause"; relieve employees from duty because of lack of work or for other legitimate reasons; maintain the efficiency of governmental operations; determine the methods, manning and personnel by which governmental operations are to be conducted; determine the content of job classifications; take all necessary actions to carry out its mission in emergencies; exercise complete control and discretion over its organization and the technology of performing its work; provided, however, that the exercise and retention of such rights does not preclude employees or their representatives from consulting or raising grievances over the consequences or impact that decisions on these matters may have on wage, hours and other terms of employment. Section 19.0 Provisions of Law. 19.1 This MOU is subject to all current applicable federal,state and local laws, regulations and resolutions. Ordinances, rules and regulations dealing with employee wages, hours and working conditions enacted by the City Council shall be subject to the appropriate revisions, amendments and deletions necessary to conform with the purpose, intent and application of the provisions of this Agreement. 19.2 If any part or provision of this MOU is in conflict or inconsistent with such applicable provisions of federal, state or local laws or regulations, or is otherwise held to Page 7 S.E.I.U. General Services Unit be invalid or unenforceable by any tribunal or competent jurisdiction, such part shall be suspended and superseded by such applicable law or regulations, and the remainder of this MOU shall not be affected. Section 20.0 Applicability of other MOU's, Rules and Regulations. It is agreed that all provisions of any existing or prior, understandings or personnel policies, customs, practices and actions not specifically included in Atascadero Municipal Code, Title 2, Chapter 2, inclusive, and associated rules and regulations adopted by the City Council of the City of Atascadero,shall be superseded by the provisions of this MOU. Section 21.0 Peaceful Performance Clause. 21.1 The parties to this MOU recognize and acknowledge that the services performed by the City employees covered by this Agreement are essential to the public health, safety and general welfare of the residents of the City of Atascadero. Association agrees that under no circumstances will the Association recommend, encourage, cause or promote its members to initiate, participate in,nor will any member of the bargaining unit take part in, any strike, sitdown, stay-in, sickout, slow-down, of picketing (hereinafter collectively referred to as "work-stoppage") , in any office or department of the City, nor to curtail any work or restrict any production, or interfere with any operation of the City. In the event of any such work stoppage by any member of the bargaining unit,the City shall not be required to negotiate on the merits of any dispute which may have risen to such work stoppage until said work stoppage has ceased. 21.2 In the event of any work stoppage. during the term of this MOU, whether by the Association or by any member of the bargaining unit, the Association by its officers, shall immediately declare in writing and publicize that such work stoppage is illegal and unauthorized, and further direct its members in writing to cease the said conduct and resume work. Copies of such written notices shall be served upon the City. If in the obligations of this paragraph, and providing the Association has not otherwise authorized, permitted or encouraged such work stoppage, the Association shalt not be liable for any damages caused by the violation of this provision. However, the City shall have the right to dicipline, up to and including discharge,any employee who instigates, participates in, or gives leadership to, any work stoppage activity herein prohibited, and the City shall also have the right to seek full legal redress, including damages, against any such employees. Section 22.0 Implementation. 22.1 This MOU constitutes a mutual recommendation to be submitted to the Atascadero City Council. It is understood that this MOU shall not be binding upon parties either in whole or in part unless and until said City Council: a) acts, by a majority vote, formally to approve and adopt said MOU, b) and acts in a timely manner to appropriate the funds necessary to implement the provisions of this MOU which require funding. 22.2 Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event the City Council fails to take all of the actions necessary for timely implementation of this MOU, either party may request the renewal of the meet and confer process. • Page 8 S.E.I.U. General Services Unit Section 2.3.0 Term of Agreement. 23.1 This MOU shall be effective as of 0001 a.m., July 1, 1990, and shall remain in effect,unless modified by mutual agreement, until midnight June 30, 1993. —23.2 If either party wants to renegotiate a successor agreement, such parry shall serve upon the other during the period March 1st to April 1st of the last year of this Agreement, its written re est to reopen the Agreement as well as its written proposals to amend this Agreement. Upon receipt of such written notice and receipt of the proposals, negotiations shall begin no later than thirty(30)days after such receipt or May 1st,whichever is later. DANE AtascaJero General Services Bargaining Unit City of Atascadero Page 9 MEETING AGENDA DATE-J11z4ao REM A-j s RESOLUTION 98-90 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO APPROVING A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING- BETWEEN THE CITY OF ATASCADERO AND LOCAL 817 SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNIT ATASCADERO CHAPTER CLERICAL BARGAINING UNIT WHEREAS, the City of Atascadero has met and conferred in good faith with Local 817 Service Employees International Union (S . I .E.U. ) Atascadero Chapter Clerical Bargaining Unit for the purpose of discussing wages, benefits, and other conditions of employment ; and WHEREAS, the City of Atascadero and the Atascadero Chapter Clerical Bargaining Unit have reached an agreement regarding said wages, benefits , and other conditions of employment for the term of Fiscal Years 1990/91 , 1991/92 and 1992/93; • NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Atascadero City Council hereby approves the Memorandum of Understanding between the City and Local 817 Service Employees International Union Atascadero Chapter Clerical Bargaining Unit for Fiscal `fears 1990/91 , 1991/92 and 1992/93, and authorizes the City Manager , as the Employee Relations Officer , to enter into said agreement on behalf of the City . On motion by Councilperson and seconded by Councilperson the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ADOPTED: • ATTEST: LEE DAYKA, City Clem ROBERT LILLEY, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: ARTHER MONTANDON, City Attorney RAY WINDSOR, City Manager res9e90 • • MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN CITY OF ATASCADERO AND LOCAL 817 SERVICEIMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION ATASCADERO CHAPTER CLERICAL BARGAINING UNIT This Memorandum of Understanding is entered into between the Employee Relations Officer of the City of Atascadero, hereinafter referred to as "City," and the Local 817 Service Employees International Union, Atascadero Chapter Clerical Bargaining Unit, hereinafter referred to as "Union," and made pursuant to California Government Code Sections 300 et seq., City of Atascadero Municipal Code, Title 2, Chapter 2, Section 2 -2.01 through Section 2-2.13, inclusive, and the City of Atascadero Resolution No. 12 430, dated July 14, 1980 and subsequent amendments thereto. The parties have met and conferred in good faith regarding employment terms and conditions for members of the Unit as recognized by the City of Atascadero on May 9, 1983, and, having reached an agreement, as herein set forth, submit this memorandum to • the City Council with a joint recommendation that the Council resolve to adopt the terms and conditions and take such other additional actions as may be necessary to implement its provisions. Section 1.0 Purpose. It is the purpose of the Memorandum of Understanding, hereinafter referred to as "MOU," to promote and provide for continuity of operation in employment through harmonious relations,cooperation and understanding between Management and employees covered by the provisions of this MOU and to set forth the understanding reached between the parties as a result of good faith negotiations on matters set forth herein. Section 2.0 Full Understanding, Modifications and Waiver. 2.1 This MOU sets forth the full and entire understanding of the parties regarding the matters set forth herein. Any other prior or existing understanding or agreement by the parties,whether formal or informal, regarding any such matters, are hereby suspended or terminated in their entirety, if in conflict with this Memorandum. 2.2 No agreement, alteration, understanding, variation, waiver or modification of any of the terms or provisions contained herein shall in any manner be binding upon the parties hereto unless made and executed in writing by both parties hereto and, if required, approved and implemented by the City Council. • 2.3 The waiver of any breach, term or condition of this Agreement by either party shall not constitute a precedent in the future enforcement of all its terms and provisions. S.E.I.U. Clerical Unit • Section 3.0 Vacation and Holidays. 3.1 Vacation leave shall be credited, computed and used as specified by Section 9.0, Employee Benefits, of Resolution No.12-80, dated July 14, 1980. 322 It is agreed and understood that the taking of vacation shall be as scheduled by the Department Head subject to the needs of the City. 3.3 Holidays shall be observed in accordance with Section 9.4, Employees Benefits, of Resolution No. 12-80 dated July 1.4,1980, and Resolution No. 52-82, Section 5, Subparagraph K dated November 8, 1982. 3.4 Floating holidays, as provided for in sub-section 3.3 above, may be used any time after January 1st of each year. 3.5 December 24, 1990, shall be observed as a holiday. :3.6 Martin Luther Kings Birthday shall be observed as a holiday for employees in January 1992. Section 4.0 Salaries and Health Insurance. 4.1 Salaries. 4.1.1 Effective the fust day of the first full pay period in July 1990, salaries in effect on June 30, 1990 shall be increased by five percent(5%). 4.1.2 Effective the first day of the first full pay period in July 1991, employees shall receive a salary increase which shall be determined by the Los Angeles/Anahieml Riverside, Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers, May to May (printed by the BLS on about June 20, 1991),Consumer Price Index. The salary increase shall equal the full percentage change of the CPI-W up to five percent(5%)plus one-half of the full percentage change above five percent(5%). EXAMPLE: Assume the CPI-W= 5.6% F_'Ieh of cast /ilk vc� Therefore, full CFI-W up to 5% +1/2 of CPI-W over 5% is: 510 +0.8% [6.6-5.0 = 1.6; (1.6)/2 = 0.81 = 5.8% 4.1.3 Effective the first day of July 992, employees shall receive a salary increase which shall be determined by the formula detailed in 4.1.2 above but with appropriate effective dates. 4.2 Salary Administration. 4.2.1 Newly hired employees shall normally be placed at Step A. Advanced step hiring may be approved by the City Manager. • 4.2.2 Movement between steps shall be at twelve month intervals and subject to satisfactory performance. The initial step movement after hiring, however, shall be after twelve months or after completion-of probation,whichever occurs later. Pagez' S.E.I.U. Clerical Unit • 4.:3 Special Adjustments. In addition to increases provided above, the City shall make a special range adjustment of five percent(5%)on the first day of the first full pay period in July 1990 for all classifications in the Unit except the class of Building Aide. 4:3-"Health Insurance. 44.1 The City shall continue to provide the current medical and dental benefits. 4.12 The Medical Insurance Committee may recommend changes in the level of service and service providers to the City during the term of the agreement. 4.13 During the term of this MCU,the City shall continue to make the contribution it was making effective June 30, 1940, plus it shall pay 100% of employee only cost increases, and 50% of dependent cost increases. If the increase cost for dependent coverage exceeds thirty-five (35%) percent in any one year during the term of this MMU the employee shall pay that portion in excess of thirty-five(35%)percent. 4.14 For those employees without dependents or who do not choose to enroll their f dependents in the City sponsored medical and dental plan, the amount of the City contribution shall be paid to the employee as an addition to his/her regular pay. �5 4-4 Vision Insurance During the term of this MCU, the City shall continue to provide employee only vision insurance at no cost to the employee. • Section 5.0 Union Security 5.1 .1 Dues Deductions. The City and Union agree that requests for, changes in, and cancellations of union dues and other deductions shall be promptly processed through the Finance Department and put into effect at the employee's request. Deductions shall be made from each paycheck and remitted to the Union monthly. Requests for deductions shall be made by City-approved authorization cards in accordance with applicable State law. The City will process changes in the amount of Union dues as often as once every three months. Dues deduction amounts may vary between employees. The City will notify the Union of all changes in deduction monthly. 5.1 . Maintenance of Membership. Any employee on dues deductions as provided in 5.1 .1 above on the effective date of this MOU and any employee who commences such dues deductions during the term of this MCU, shall continue such dues deduction for the balance of the term of the MOU, unless such employee gives the proper notification to the Union to withdraw from dues deduction during the month of March of any year during this MOU. 5.1.3 Union shall indemnify and save harmless the City of Atascadero, its officers, agents, and employees from any and all claims , demands , damages, costs , expenses, or liability arising out of Section 5. 5? Union Access. • A) The City agrees that an authorize union staff member may be granted access to a work location to participate in investigation and processing of grievances per the grievance procedure or to observe working conditions, when and to the extent Page 3 S.E.I.U. Clerical Unit • necessary, and only if it will in no event adversely affect the operational, security or safety requirements of the city, upon the approval of the Employee Relations Officer or his/her designee. B) The Union shall provide the Employee Relations Officer with a list of all authorized staff representatives, and the list shall be kept current by the Union. C) When and to the extent necessary and only if it will in no event adversely affect the operational,security or safety requirements of the City and upon notification and approval of the Employee Relations Officer or his/her designee, an authorized union staff member is permitted to communicate with employee(s) and/or union steward(s) on official City time without said employee(s) and/or union steward(s) loss of compensation. It is not the intent of this section to allow general union meetings on City time; but rather to allow investigation and discussion of working conditions, grievances and safety issues. D) It is understood that every reasonable effort shall be made to perform the above activities on off-duty time. J E) The City will allow the use of existing bulletin board space. Bulletin board space shall be used only for the following subjects: 1) Local 817 recreational information, social and related news bulletins; 2) scheduled meetings; 3) information concerning elections or results thereof; and 4) reports of official business of Local 1317. Prior to posting items shall be initialed by an authorized representative of the Union • and City. All outdated materials must be removed by the Union. 5.3 Union Stewards. A) The City authorizes the unit to appoint three (3) "union stewards", any one of which may represent an employee subject to the City's grievance procedure. B) The Union shall provide the employee Relations Officer with a list of all authorized union stewards,and the list shall be kept current. C) An employee and/or his/her "union steward" representative may, when and to the extent necessary,take official City time without loss of compensation in order to participate in the investigation and processing of a grievance,upon notification and approval of the Employee Relations Officer or his/her designee. 13) The Employee Relations Officer will approve employee and/or union steward taking official time to investigate and process a grievance when and to the extent necessary and only if it will in no event adversely affect the operational, security or safety requirements of the City. E) It is understood that the employee and or union steward shall make every reasonable effort to perform the above activities on off duty time. Section 6.0 Contracting Out. • The City will give reasonable notice to the Union if it intends to contract out the functions currently performed by employees within the Unit. Upon request, the City will meet with the Union to explain the reason for the decision to contract out and to solicit Union views Page 4 S.E.W. Clerical Unit • on the proposal. Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the rights of the City Council to contract out work in its sole discretion. Section 7.0 Term Life Insurance. 7.1 City shall maintain a term life insurance policy for each unit member in a total amount of Twenty Thousand dollars ($20,000.00). City shall pay all premiums for such policy during the term of this MOU. 7.2 The City shall maintain a term life insurance policy for each dependent of each unit member in a total amount of One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00) per dependent and shall pay all premiums for such policy during the term of this Agreement. 7.3 For those employees without dependents or who do not choose to enroll their dependents in the City sponsored life plan, the amount of the City ocntribution shall be paid as an addition Section 8.0 General Benefits. to his/her regular pay. 8.1 It is agreed that overtime, compensatory time off(CTO), retirement, leaves and other benefits and conditions of employment shall be as specified by City Resolutions No. 12 -80, 31-81 and 52-82 and Atascadero Municipal Codes, Title 2, Chapter 2, inclusive. Pregnancy leave shall be provided in accordance with State Law. 8.2 The City agrees to add grandparents to the list of family members for whom the employee is allowed to take bereavement leave. 8-3 Sick Leave for Dependent Care. • A regular employee may use sick leave for the care of relatives who are ill, injured or pregnant and who are living in the employee's household. 8.4 Pay on Promotion. An employee who is promoted shall receive a salary increase of at least one step (5%). Therefore, the employee shall be placed on step "A", or that step which produces at least a one step salary increase. Section 9.0 Probationary Period. The probationary period for newly hired employees shall be twelve months. The probationary period for employees promoted to a higher classification shall be six months is the new classification. The City shall have the option of granting a newly hired employee regular status at any time after nine(9)months of service. Section 10.0 Shift Changes. The City shall give employees reasonable notice of routine shift changes. Emergency shift changes shall be made on an as needed basis. Section 11.0 State Disability Insurance. 11.1 City shall continue to provide State Disability Insurance as an employee cost through • payroll deduction. Page 5 S.E.I.U. Cleriedt Unit • 11.2 State Disability Insurance shall be integrated with sick leave with the objective of providing full compensation. Section 12.0 Retirement The City shall amend the Retirement system to provide Post Reirement Survirors Benefit effective July, 1991. Section 13.0 Personnel Rules and Regulations The parties agree to meet on the implementation of new Personnel Rules and Regulations. The meetings will include all interested Employee Organizations in the City, however the Union reserves its right to maintain an independent position(s)on the proposed changes. Section 14.0 Grievance Procedure. Employees shall be entitled to utilize the grievance procedure as outlined in Section 6.0 of Resolution No. 12-80. Section 15.0 Management Rights. The authority of the City includes,but is not limited to the exclusive right to determine the mission of its constituent departments, commissions and boards; set standards of service; and promotion; direct its employees; take disciplinary action for "just cause"; relieve employees from duty because of lack of work or for other legitimate reasons; maintain the efficiency of governmental operations; determine the methods, manning and personnel by which governmental operations are to be conducted; determine the content of job classifications; take all necessary actions to carry out its mission in emergencies; exercise complete control and discretion over its organization and the technology of performing its work; provided, however, that the exercise and retention of such rights does not preclude employees or their representatives from consulting or raising grievances over the consequences or impact that decisions on these matters may have on wage, hours and other terms of employment. Section 16.0 Provisions of Law. 16.1 This MOU is subject to all current applicable federal,state and local laws, regulations and resolutions. Ordinances, rules and regulations dealing with employee wages, hours and working conditions enacted by the City Council shall be subject to the appropriate revisions, amendments and deletions necessary to conform with the purpose, intent and application of the provisions of this Agreement. 16.2 If any part or provision of this MOU is in conflict or inconsistent with such applicable provisions of federal, state or local laws or regulations, or is otherwise held to be invalid or unenforceable by any tribunal or competent jurisdiction, such part shall be suspended and superseded by such applicable law or regulations, and the remainder of this MOU shall not be affected. Page 6 S.E.I.U. Clerical Unit . Section 17.0 Applicability of other MOU's, Rules and Regulations. It is agreed that all provisions of any existing or prior, understandings or personnel policies, customs, practices and actions not specifically included in Atascadero Municipal Code, Title 2, Chapter 2, inclusive, and associated rules and regulations adopted by the City Council of the City of Atascadero,shall be superseded by the provisions of this MOU. Section 13.0 Peaceful Performance Clause. 13.1. The parties to this MOU recognize and acknowledge that the services performed by the City employees covered by this Agreement are essential to the public health, safety and general welfare of the residents of the City of Atascadero. Association agrees that under no circumstances will the Association recommend, encourage, cause or promote its members to initiate, participate in, nor will any member of the bargaining unit take part in, any strike, sitdown, stay-in, sickout, slow-down, of picketing (hereinafter collectively referred to as "woik-stoppage") , in any office or department of the City, nor to curtail any work or restrict any production, or interfere with any operation of the City. In the event of any such work stoppage by any member of the bargaining unit,the City shall not be required to negotiate on the merits of any dispute which may have risen to such work stoppage until said work stoppage has ceased 18.2 In the event of any work stoppage, during the term of this MOU, whether by the Association or by any member of the bargaining unit, the Association by its officers, shall iuzmediately declare in writing and publicize that such work stoppage is illegal and unauthorized, and .further direct its members in writing to cease the said conduct and • resume work. Copies of such written notices shall be served upon the City. If in the obligations of this paragraph, and providing the Association has not otherwise authorized, permitted or encouraged such work stoppage, the Association shall not be liable for any damages caused by the violation of this provision. However, the City shall have the right to dicipline,up to and including discharge,any employee who instigates, participates in, or gives leadership to, any work stoppage activity herein prohibited, and the City shall also have the right to seek full legal redress, including damages, against any such employees. Section 19.0 Implementation.. 19.1 This MOU constitutes a mutual recommendation to be submitted to the Atascadero City Council. It is understood that this MOU shall not be bidding upon parties either in whole or in part unless and until said City Council: a) acts,by a majority vote, formally to approve and adopt said MOU, b) and acts in a timely manner to appropriate the funds necessary to implement the provisions of this MOU which require funding. 19.2 Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event the City Council fails to take all of the actions necessary for timely implementation of this MOU, either party may request the renewal of the meet and confer process. Section 20.0 Term of Agreement. 20.1 This MOU shall be effective as of 0001 a.m., July 1, 1990, and shall remain in effect,unless modified by mutual agreement, until midnight June 30, 1993. • 20.2 If either party wants to renegotiate a successor agreement, such party shall serve Page 7 S.E.I.U. Clerical Unit upon the other during the period March 1st to April 1st of the last year of this Agreement, its written request to reopen the Agreement as well as its written proposals to amend this Agreement. Upon receipt of such written notice and receipt of the proposals, negotiations shall begin no later than thirty(30)days after such receipt or May 1st, whichever is later. DATE 7 I C g o At-veadero Clerical Bargaining Unit City of Atascadero 64, • Page 8 REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL CITY OF ATASCADERO Agenda Item: X3--1 ,(B) Through: Ray Windsor, City Manager Meeting'Date:, 7,/101/90 Via: Henry Fngen', Community Development Director- From: Lisa Schicker, City Arborist SUBJECT: HERITAGE TREE REMOVAL REQUEST — GARCIA RiOAD E NOXON Consideration-of a request to remove sixty nine trees banging ill, size from 4"-` 2'4" dbh Quercus lobata and Quercus 1agrifolta) and impact seventy ;five others (ranging in size from 4 t� - 24" dbh °s spec'es', !as those.'r »Quad) €or the purpotes of road construction for the extension of `Garcia Roadby applicants Bill Pippin, Don Vaughn:, nd' Conrad Langille, The oaks are located, in the proposed roadbed. (and in the swales, and cut and fill areas); designed to access ten build a ,e lots. RR 3C ATICK:\ Based- can the arborist`s re ort and the. existing Tree :ordinance, recommend approval of: the: removals and: accept 'APplicants' proopgai to donate to the Tree Rep-la ement Fund based on a one for one replacement ratio. Please see additional comments and details in analysis section of, this report. The recommended replacement fee..is-,'a maximum of $15,000.. BACKGROUND: The 'Tree`Ord nance specifies that live native, trees 20" ,,or greater dbh (measured four foot above grade)` are deemed heritage trees and rannot be removed unless approved. by the City Council €ollowirg a pylic hearing. An original removal request came before City Council 'On, JaAuary .23,, 1990. The original request was for the removal :of 160 trees. The application was denied because all parties were aware that alternatives that caused the removal of fewer trees. existed. This report describes one of those alternatives The site has been posted and the center line. of ,the proposed roadway, has recently been staked .with lath stakes painted orange. Trees to be removed have been marked with red fl ,ging' tape and trees. that will; be impacted are marked with green flagging tape. The 'trees were ,inspected by TSA certified`arborist Jack Brazeal and the ,QitY Arbgri.st .00 several occasions . Mr. Brazeal has created a color-coded -,map discribing the situation that can be used for field inspection. Applicant Don . Vaughn is available to guide council Members through the protect and can be contacted at 466 - 4140. The -cblcOr-coded map.=s tall. be made available for - field visits and can be found -in the City Manager,' s Office,. STATUS ar, E wtEEEIWG AND B J"IFtC t "M AS. REVIEW: This proposed roadway has —been- reviewed - and tentatively' t+ r 3. for compliance with road building. standaards . by thea Cit y',s -,ineering Department. This project has , also received environmental review tiroughm :`the Community, ? e relopment Department and the 're'sults, ,of that$lzeVi w can be found attached to this report. ANALYSIS-: Because this area has been subdivided into ten'.. buildable' .l6t�� they, must be ,.accessed in some way'. r .A roadway; and c,u,l-de-sac to y$� +cess= e�..l lotsv'Fa certainly easiertCl Crf@s1gI2 before- Lh$r' . . QItS get ' s:Qld. 5.o in-divideaI property,, owners, and this is the situation tounc.i.l .:has before them, If, this.. roadis ; to be. built : 'it�.is ' inevitable .that eome trees 'will need to came out. This is, t needless to say, a major request for tree, V1al . The developers axed their - e veers have laokec at altern t:i ." , have reduced the length of ' the,, ro A and:�:have attempted to- ,00', Vis1 many tees as possible. They are also, willing to donate: money into_the tree replaceanent fund,, which ° will` _'lie . mast effective . in;theorgt ;;run for ' providing mflniesfor thenj, re lantiof trees for the,. future: In the l that I have reviewed there ^appears` to bee ,a wA3 t .,,,save, as a few mord., trees. if 9me minor adjustments in the widtl' cif 'the,road shoulders,: we're reduced or, the >road was slightly realigned= en= :in the vicinity of Seome-large tre e,, we have this.Iflexibility."On -this =project because the, applicants -own a.11 the property" roperty .in and' on eittasr''si4o df the road, -"And l ould prefer to . ,save 'more trees than- aha on PAPor. Procedurally f it would be e. *ler to" address these small, thauq i`. ' -in:- the field {as fietc work ghat es} when construction ,occurs; . 'this -w,6u3d allow far maximum -flexibility An,restaainingseveral- valuable trees Vhile maintainlni a safe roadway. Ther'efors I ate_ irecommend .ng the foll.owtn Approve tae request for rwbov*1 *f those trees and accept 4= In lieu contribution into the Tree Replaatement t-rund. The finaa3 tally of propo sod- tree.,removal and,protecti.on titer Tree, It ova t 7 Trees to a .m acted75 Ln an. .er d Trees: . of the. 75, trees to be epaoti d w'il l be signi ican `f act . by tbs. void-building,,, sati vvities F even w th trite protection. Those trees-, am not directly . in ..the patty of the -road,,but maty be affe teed tsy ct nstrxactioxi < rrdj}±fir decliniiag, health, caused, by, cut and :fill I recommend . that these'' trees ,Da consiteead in the - F count when determining replacement costs . Trees that may be saved with minor adjustments to the shoulder: Depending on engineering and environmental review, an additional 3 heritage and ten trees of lesser size could also be saved. If this were possible, the final tally of trees would be calculated in the field after construction was complete. These trees would then be classified as endangered and treated as such. Recommended Replacements : All trees to be removed and all trees that are listed as endangered shall be replaced through Tree Fund Fees . Approve the request for removal of these trees and accept replacement fees based on the following formula: One for One replacement ratio for those trees that are to be removed. ( 69 trees) (This would be reduced if minor changes were permitted in road building standards (to reduce shoulder width in areas of healthy trees . ) One for Five replacement ratio for those trees that are significantly endangered by cut and fill activities - it is quite likely that these trees will not survive the next five years . ( 30 trees/5 = 116 replacement trees" . The current rate we have been asking for replacement costs is lower than the actual cost for replanting a tree by today' s figures and does not include expenses involved with fencing, soil amendments , fertilizer and/or maintenance and watering. Furthermore, the cost of the trees being removed are significantly higher, recent studies have shown that the cost of a city tree with a fifty year lifespan ranges from $57 , 000 to $162 , 000 ! we have been asking that $100 per tree be charged, while the going replacement rate is somewhere in the range of $150 - $600 per tree, depending on conditions (according to City of Thousand Oaks , Visalia and San Luis Obispo) . Therefore, I am recommending that Council accepts a bottom line replacement amount of $200 per tree. (The total replacement costs = 69 trees removed + 6 endangered trees for a 5 : 1 replacement ratio = 75 trees * $200 = $15 , 000 . Again this amount could be less , dependent on the final tally of trees removed. ) For a complete discussion of replacement costs for tree removal, please see the memo entitled "A Proposal for Interim Tree Replacement Standards" that has been prepared for tonight' s City Council Meeting. Attachments : Vicinity Map Garcia Road Extension Location Map Environmental Review Tree Removal Application and Report by Arborist Jack Brazeal cc North County Realty - Pippin and Langille Don Vaughn Jack Brazeal R1! G - C tF CRU; D� CFE 5 p, o Q/0 RO.c10 Q /O RDAO ✓✓ gyp• AS k��p ��O Rio T' .� � �C✓�1 y S CADERO o —i 6.4 RC 1A/ ROAD w i 1 N w �- o N N iI C� Z1 s y Z CITY OF ATASCADERO ENVIRONMENTAL COORDINATOR NEGATIVE DECIARATIO* COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 6500 PALMA AVE. ATASCADERO, CA 93422 (805) 461-5035 APPLICANT: Conrad Langille c/o Twin Cities Engineering Templeton, CA 93466 (805) 434-1834 PROJECT TITLE: Garcia Rd. Extension Construction (Revised Plan) PROJECT LOCATION: Easterly portion of Garcia Rd. in Block 50, AC PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construction of easterly portion of Garcia Rd. FINDINGS: 1. The project does not have the potential to degrade the environment. 2. The project will not achieve short-term to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals. 0 3. The project does not have impacts which are individually limited, but comulatively considerable. 4. The project will not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings either directly or indirectly. DETERNIINATION: Based on the above findings, and the information contained in the initial study (made a part hereof by refer- ence and on file in the Community Development Department), it has been determined that the above project will not have an adverse impact on the environment. 41 Henry Engen Community Development Director Date Posted: July 5, 1990 Date Adopted: CDD 17-89 CITY OF ATASCADERO .a.a, ion leis MR ENVIRONMENTAL COORDINATOR ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 6500 PALMA AVE. ATASCADERO, CA 93422 (805) 461-5035 Please type or print clearly in ink. Incomplete forms will be returned. GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: GG�t1r2�`L7 L�`NGVRt_t_E �TWlt3GtZtES EtJG,ItVC. Address: T'p• t30x 7 -7 7 Te ►.etc—u.E-s'at..► C4 R346-6 Phone #: SOS - 4 34- - t 8 3-A Project Address: Assessor's Parcel #: Legal Description: LZ:>TS 6,10,1 1, 14 -r"cz u 100 , Z 3 `c` z 4 B t-oc k.. 50 3 List and describe any other permits or public agency (Federal, State or local) approvals required for this project: C RAoIt-.1G W7-NCp- .2 r%ANAMNT ¢ l3LryG 1��MkT Proposed Use of Site: tz u L_ 2 s i a e-=t�,1 c.c S PROJECT DESCRIP'ITON: 1. Site area (in acres): S 2,,d S 2. Square footage of buildings: 11 ,4 ��- = 3 3,Oo0 ± 3. Square footage of parking areas: 11 x 10 SO{ = I 1 � S 5 4- 4. Number of on-site parking spaces: 5. Describe proposed scheduling: 6. Describe associated projects: 7. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, anticipated sale prices or rents, and anticipated household size. 1 1 - 4 1H�,t=r:>2 c-�-OM R,E S t P t=t,,J G E S 8. If commercial, indicate the type (neighborhood, regional, etc.), and square footage of sales areas. 9. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and products/byproducts produced. 10. If institutional, indicate major functions, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, and community benefits to be derived from the project. ENVIRONMENTAL S=NQ 1. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, availability of utilities, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. DescLbesany�exisw�rH Vo�Me� to�Ge site, of the structures. A►Nt, t tiP.t1-( G5.w-T2E ES NtiTiVE G2ASSC S, 5�-12uC?�S 2. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals, and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of development, and scale of development (building height, setback, etc.). 2u SZ..v. L. 2.1=51 �E1�,)-t IAL LOTS TD SOtJTN �W�ST �` �p2T1-4 ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS Are the following potential effects of your project? Provide a written response to each item checked 'YES". YES NO 1. Change in existing features of any stream, swale, drainage pattern, or substantial alteration to existing topography? ❑ 2. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas, public lands, or roads? ❑ [' 3. Change in pattern, scale, or character of the general area of the project? ❑ [�- 4. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter? ® [� 5. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes. or oders in vicinity? ❑ ['� 6. Change in stream or ground water quality or quantity? Q ❑ 7. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels? ❑ Q� 8. Is the site on filled land or on slopes of 10% or more? ❑ ❑' 9. Use or disposal of hazardous materials? ❑ [� 10. Substantial change in demand for municipal services? ❑ ❑ 11. Substantial increase in fossil fuel consumption? ❑ [a' 12. Is the project related to a larger project or series of projects? ❑ 13. Removal of, or grading within the dripline of mature trees? ❑ ADDITIONAL INFORMA77ON 0 Discuss in detail the other development alternatives that were considered for this site or project. Explain why each of the alternatives was rejected. Provide any additional information that you believe will be beneficial in the analysis of the potential environ- mental affects of your project. Such additional supporting data may include: Maps Photographs Charts Drainage Studies Soils Reports It Geologic Reports Archaeological Reports Traffic Studies T. = 4 . S eEil� ON I hereby certify that the statements furnished above, and in the attached exhibits, present the data and information required for this initial evaluation, to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. �A Signature Date CM 13/6 i n 11 I EOSI Y a f "/ U TI •F / ,lam 1 •e..,- (�OGA�101� C,A?C1k 1 cr PEC-04, I I � II I � 1 11 Z a 1 , r 1 s� 1 f` II 11 �� r0 1/ 1 I ! 1' 11 1 aseade�Ce INCORPORATED JULY 2, 2979 • lil INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST I. BACKGROUND: U D. 1. Proposal Title: Garcia Road Extension (Revised Plan) 2. Primary Entitlement and/or file number (s) : Construction Permit 3. Brief description of proposal: Construction of the easterly extension of Garcia Rd. to provide access to existing single family residential lots. Construction of single family residences on each of the existing lots is anticipated as a result of road construction. II . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS : (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are provided on attached sheets. ) 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: YES MAYBE NO a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? X b. Disruptions, displacements, com- paction or overcovering of the soil? X C. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? X d. The destruction, covering or modifica- tion of any unique geologic or physical features? X e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? X f. Changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of any lake? X g. Exposure of people or property to geo- logical hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure, X or similar hazards? YES MAYBE NO 2. Air . Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or deterio- ration of ambient air quality? X b. The creation of objectionable odors? X c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? X 3. Water . Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements? X b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? X c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? X e. Discharge into surface waters or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to, tempera- ture, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? X g. Change in the quantity of ground waters eithero thr ugh direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? X i. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? X 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (in- cluding trees, shrubs , grass, crops, aquatic plants) ? 2 YES MAYBE NO b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of plants? X C. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? X d. Reduction in acreage of any agricul- X tural crop? 5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, or insects) ? X b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, X rare, or endangered species of animals? C. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? X 6 . Noise. Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? X b. Exposure of people to severe noise? X 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal pro- duce new light or glare? X 8 . Land Use. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? X 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X b. Substantial depletion of any nonre- newable natural resource? X 10. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve: 3 YES MAYBE NO a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including , but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? X b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? X 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? X 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect ex- isting housing, or create a demand for additional housing? X 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? X b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? X c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? X d. Alterations to present patterns of cir- culation or movement of people and/or goods? X e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? X 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? X b. Police protection? X c. Schools? X d. Parks or other recreational facilities? X e. Maintenance of public facilities, in- cluding roads? X 4 YES MAYBE NO f. Other governmental services? X 15 . Ener2y. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? X 16 . Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? X b. Communications systems? X c. Water? X d. Sewer or septic tanks? X e. Storm water drainage? X f. Solid waste and disposal? X 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: a. Creation of any health hazard or poten- tial health hazard (excluding mental health) ? X b. Exposure of people to potential health X hazards? 18 . Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? X 19 . Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? X 20. Cultural Resources. a. Will the proposal result in the alter- ation of or the destruction of a pre- historic archaeological site? X b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a 5 YES MAYBE NO prehistoric or historic building, structure, or object? X i C. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? X d. Will the proposal restrict existing � g religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? X 21. Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels , threaten to elim- inate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or or prehistory? _X b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disad- vantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will X endure will into the future) . c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant. ) d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X III . DETERMINATION 6 On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARA- TION will be prepared. (SEE ARBORIST' S REPORT) I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. July 3, 1990 Date Henry Engen Community Development Director 7 INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST • SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSES GARCIA ROAD EXTENSION 1 .b. The grading necessary for the construction of Garcia Road will result in the displacement and compaction of the native soils . The extent of the grading for this road is no greater than would be anticipated for any road building project of this magnitude . The compaction of the soil is unavoidable, and in most cases, is required for the purposes of obtaining a stable road bed. C. The grading required for the construction of the road will change the topography and ground surface relief features in the immediate vicinity of the construction. Changes in drainage localized patterns will be accommodated through dikes and ditches constructed as part of the road. e. Construction activity will remove native grasses and other vegetation exposing the surface soil to rain and wind which may cause soil erosion. Soil that is stockpiled may also be subject to wind or water erosion. Soil erosion and sedimentation controls should be imposed as part of any road improvement plans . f. If not properly controlled, soil which is eroded from the construction area may be transported to Graves Creek. Such siltation could adversely affect the channel of the Creek. Soil erosion and sedimentation control methods should be installed prior to the commencement of construction activities, and should be monitored through the life of the project . g. There have been no landslide, earthquake, or other geological hazards identified within the area affected by this road project . 3 .b. Compaction of the soil in the area affected by the construction of the road alter and increase storm water runoff. Grading that is done will alter local drainage patterns . Drainage facilities will be constructed in conjunction with the road which will redirect the drainage and avoid adverse impacts on adjacent parcels . 4 .a. The construction of the road will necessitate the removal of 69 Live Oak and Valley Oak trees . An additional 75 oak trees will be impacted by the cutting and filling necessary to build the road. This is a significant impact on the urban forest at this location. Alternative locations for the road have been explored which require removal of or cause impact to a larger number of trees than the currently proposed location. The current proposal is the preferable right-of-way. The City' s Arborist has determined that three (3) heritage trees in addition to ten (10) trees of lesser size can be saved through minor shoulder and right-of-way adjustments . Such adjustments should be made to save the affected trees . b. Grading and the soil compaction necessary to construct the road may result in a barrier to the natural replenishment of the vegetation removed. Future residential development of the parcels accessed by the road may likewise inhibit natural replenishment of native plant species . 5 .a. The removal of the natural vegetation necessary to accommodate road construction will affect the native animals dependent upon that vegetation as a source of food and shelter. Eventual development of the adjacent parcels for residential uses will also impact the number and diversity of animals which utilize the area. The most severely impacted will be those species with the least tolerance for contact with humans . b. No rare or endangered species of wildlife have been identified as resident within the affected area. C. To the extent that new residents of the area accessed by the extension of Garcia Rd. have, or acquire, domestic animals, new species of animals will be introduced into the area. Free roaming dogs may discourage certain wildlife species from using the area and livestock (horses, etc. ) may compete for food sources with native wildlife. 6 .a. Noise levels will be elevated during construction of the road due to the operation of construction equipment . Hours of operation of the construction equipment will be limited by the Zoning Ordinance . There are a limited number of residences that will be directly affected by the increased noise levels . The duration of the increased noise levels will be limited to the construction period of the road. Use of the road by motorized vehicles after its construction will increase ambient noise levels in areas near the road. 8 . The area to be accessed by the new road has been i2 designated on the City' s General Plan and Zoning Maps for single family residential use . No change in the planned land use of the area is proposed or anticipated as a result of providing access to the area. 11 . The population of the immediate area accessed by the road can be expected to increase as a result of the construction of single family homes . The population increase is anticipated by the General Plan, however. 13 .a. The extension of Garcia Rd. will provide access to twelve (12) single family parcels . If each parcel is developed, and if it is assumed that each dwelling will generate ten (10) vehicle trips per day, a total of 120 additional vehicle trips may be generated from the subject area. This number of trips may be seen by existing residents of the area as a significant increase in traffic volumes on the streets leading to the area. C . See response to item 13 .a. above. The existing bridge on Garcia Rd. will be further impacted by the increased traffic volumes that will be generated by the anticipated residential development that will follow the construction of the road extension. f. See responses to items 13 .a. and b. above . 14 . a - f. Increased demands on all public services can be • anticipated as a result of the residential development that is expected to follow the construction of the Garcia Rd. extension. The density and number of dwelling units planned is within the limits established by the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. The parcels to be accessed are existing legal lots that can be developed after access is secured and building permits are issued. The construction of the road extension will not increase the planned land use of the subject area. Development fees and property taxes will be utilized to offset the cost of providing the required governmental services . 16 .c . The eventual development of the affected parcels for residential use will require the provision of a potable water supply. The Atascadero Mutual Water Company has, in the past, advised that adequate supplies of water are available to serve anticipated residential growth. Water lines to serve the residential parcels will be extended within the Right-of-Way of Garcia Rd. No distinguishable environmental effects should occur as a 3 i result of the installation of the water lines with road construction. d. Waste disposal from new single family dwellings will be handled on-site by septic tanks and leachfields . All public health and building code requirements will be met in the design of the individual waste disposal systems . e. An extension of Garcia Road and the construction of additional single family dwellings will increase the amount, duration, and velocity of storm water runoff. The road improvement plans contain provisions for handling storm water runoff. The site design for future single family homes will need to address storm water runoff both on and off site. 18 . The grading necessary for road construction, and the removal of 160 trees may be aesthetically offensive to some observers . Relocation of the road, and a reduction in the number of trees to be removed, will reduce the aesthetic impact of the project . 20 . No known archaeological resources exist in the area that would be impacted by road construction activities . Upon determination of the final alignment of the Garcia Road extension, an archaeological survey of the impacted areas will be required. Standard conditions regarding archaeological resources will be attached to the project as may be recommended by an appropriate authority. 21 .c . The impacts of the proposed construction of the Garcia Road extension on native flora and fauna may be seen by some observers as significant . These impacts have been reduced by moving the road, or have been mitigated, in part, through planting of replacement trees . However, unless the City or some other organization is willing and able to acquire the property and preserve it in an undisturbed state, some impact to the environment as a result of the construction of a road and dwellings is inevitable. is 4 MEMORANDUM TO: Steve DeCamp June 18, 1990 VIA : FROM: Gary Sims SUBJECT: Garcia Road Extension LOCATION: Garcia Road, east of existing Garcia Road APPLICANT: Conrad Languilie/Twin Cities Engineering The road improvement plans submitted for your review comply with reasonable engineering standards for construction, alignment and drainage . Enclosures : END i Al a ill Rr- i--^`., . is�a —COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ista d _ p, PLANNING DIVISION 6500 Palma Ave. P.O. Bo x 747 Atascadero , CA 93423 (805) 466-8000 APPLICATION ' - FORM Please type or print in ink Owner: N0: Ct �.H 7".f RF-,l I r•; Agent : Address: (_ z �' s �n I�Ic� S i Address: y k; `RLNkLt � Com. �,-a4� �� y U., �� uv � Phone #: SCS -i Z Phone #: Zzy G Applicant : Address: Phone #: Project Description: IJ113SC,�c�aAc� C uLer�-f 13 e ck So irk t A16/N S 10'" Existing Use: - _UN )DC r ► Project Address : izC'Id) i? 0 Legal Description: Lot (s) ; Block 5-0 ; Tract Assessors Parcel No (s) : I/We consent to the filing of this application and declare that this application and related documents are true and correct . (NOTE: The signature of the property owner is required on the application before it will be accepted for processing . ) Owner A ent Date Date . For Staff Use Only Fee: Receipt # : Tree Removal Permit Application ■ ,:ora:: . At i13 ;� j Supplemental Information - a 181$ u 1879. i (Please type or print in ink) Reason for Removal : At+ n1 Number of Trees to be Removed: L_r A 1��C is �1 J4 �C%N Specify the size (measured 4 ' above ground level ) , species (both common and botanical name) and condition of each tree to be removed : 1 . 5 Fr tic h 2. 3. CpL, Yc,nNi;j N,, 4. 5. [ S L J b' C l9 )C - Gam); F g L L l A Specify the size and species of the trees proposed to replace those intended for removal : u NA T v riT i> �n lJ To s(, ("I c 1`� b^� �( r e 1 l 1� ) ►Cli l 2. 3. 4. 5. Please prepare a "Plot Plan" showing all improvements on your property, trees to be removed , trees to remain, and the proposed location of replacement trees as per the attached example. C � Owner Arborist Certificate Number C Date Date G O �4 JACK BRAZEAL TREE CONSULTANT Wf TERN r' CHAPTER 4531 SKIPJACK LANE 2924 ... PASO ROBLES, CA 93446 _ WCISA #163 (805) 227-6140 -1,980 R\'5 A\ June 3 , 1990 Don Vaughn 7695 Unit B El Camino Real Atascadero, California 93422 RE: Certified Arborist Report for: Garcia Road Extension, Alternate Alignment Atascadero Colony Block 50 Improvements This report is a revision of all previous reports on all trees affected by the development of the realignment of Garcia Road Extension. The total number of trees affected is 144 trees with 69 trees requiring removal to accomodate the road improvements _and 75 trees will be impacted from slight to significantly. Standard tree protection measures are to be used on all trees that are endangered by this development. All tree protection fences, retainers, etc. are to be installed and inspected prior to any construction or demolition of this project. The trees impacted and the trees to be removed range in size from 6" to 24" dia- meter. Most of the trees are in good health and are about evenly divided between Valley Oaks and Live Oaks. The proposed realign- ment will greatly reduce the amount of trees to be removed and reduce significantly the number of trees impacted. The original Colony Road would require the removal of approximately 200 trees and impact or endanger approximately another 200 trees. All the trees proposed for removal and all the trees that will be impacted are plotted and identified on the attached set of plans . A color coded set of plans will be with the City Arborist and available for-review when Council and Administration personally review the site. All trees affected by this proposed road are marked in the field, i.e. , red for removal and green for impacted. The center- line of' the road is marked with lath stakes Painted orange. The drainage swales are color coded blue on the viewing plans but not marked or outlined in the field. (continued) Arborist Report: - 2 - June 3 , 1990 Don Vaughn Garcia Road Extension SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The developer has shown good faith in trying to preserve and pro- tect as many trees as possible and stay within the guidelines of City Ordinances and requirements. The route chosen for realignment has greatly reduced the impact of the wooded area by reducing the amount of tree removals. Compensation for the tree removals should be the required one hundred dollars for each tree removed, donated to the Atascadero City Reforestation Program. I recommend that this project be approved, as submitted. e��eJ4'� Jack Brazeal Certified Arborist JB:pb Attach. 1 CITY or, krAsCADERO REPORT TO CI'T'E' t Clh( AOZNDA -Z T : B-2 TMOU=: Ray'windsor, City Manager Meeting,Data ras No: RA -,1-00- By: 1- t3_By: Henry Eng" Community Development nirector446 , a r Considsrattion of request to abandon ;&= portion of''the Coromar. At 4Ue , right-of-way at 7350 Coromar Avenue (Mary Charleswor-th) "CXGROtM On June 19, 1990`, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearin on,the above sub pact unanimously recommending =approval of. the road abandonment as reflected in the attached 8t 8ft, r� rt There was brief discussion concerning the request as _referenced in,,' the attached minutes excerpt. RECO NDATION: ^ Per the Manning C- ommission's recommendation, approve Rag6lutic�n No. 68-90 for Roa 3 Abandonment` 1 -90 HE:ps Attachments: Staff R ort. dated .lune 5, 1990 Minutes Excerpt - June 5, 1990,' Resolution No. 68-94 i r l CITY OF A�14SCAD l tem STAFF REPQRT FOR: Planning Commission Meeting mate: June 5 19 9,0 8Y: Doug Davidson Senitsr Planner File X30: RA 01-90,-,,, fiIIBJECT: `. � Consideration c, a request to abandon a ion ,of the, coromar ; Ave', right-6:6�way. REC3: Staff rec nds that tae Planning C ission'make the.:Findings. in Exhibit I'E a:nd recommend ta.;the City 'Council that the right—,qfr» wa abanfta d Y be per the Drah -Clydan.ance in: ,Exhibit P. >�, ST' :T2�q►N rim TS: 1. Appli a t. . , , , ti . . ,'. . , ,. .Maryl Charlesworth, ` Z. Representative. . . . . . ,-.« . . . , . . :Sam 3, Project Address. ,`. . ;. . . . » . ..735a CoroMa Arte» A. tegal Description. .,,. » ,�., Ptn: o� Lata � nc� :t9 of. Rlock,'MB� Atascadero Colon B. S�.t�ir + .iii Gi-, » » 4 ♦ , , • , »� i4 ,W • , . ! ,- , 9 ii'V1�G _ `r 6. Zoning,. . . :. . . . . . . . . . . .`. .LSA'-Y 7 General Plan Designation,:, » :. "At Density -,Single a axa3;3y 8. , Existing -Use, , , , . . ,Vacant -9, `'En iro mental Status. » » , , » . »Categoxiaa.11y Exempt 1 The applicant is,'proposing PP p poas.ng the abandoxm ifit 4 of tho Coromar Ave. right-of-� ra . Vis, s >wn n Z€ t C, : Prior to adopting a Resold tionto VAcate, the City ,AUSt `be cetta.i that a right-=b -` . way, is not nece*oAry.for futnrra ra6d purposes. Coromar Ave'. whas� been constructed outside this .ra ght-of=way and-' .provides ade te.. , ' access betweti Curlaaril Ave. and chant Ave. T2at part' of the Coromar right-of-way was c a ig .na1 YI: envisioned ley the Stata af- r � California as part of the Highway 101 alignment. The State released all rights to this portion of right-of-way in 1963. Exhibit D shows that the County had the same idea in 1966, but the action was never completed. Lastly, the abandonment will not cut off future access to other property in the area, for the affected lots have frontage on a public street. The application has also received favorable responses from the other City agencies, as well as the public utility companies. The Public Works Department and Fire Department have determined that the right-of-way is not needed for circulation or emergency access, respectively. Likewise, the abandonment will not be a barrier to the existing or future provision of utilities. .Any request for a public utility reservation will be incorporated into the Resolution prior to its recording. Road abandonments are accomplished by resolution of the City Council. The procedure is governed by the Street and Highways Code, under which the Planning Commission must make the following two findings: 1. That the abandonment is in conformance with the City' s General Plan. 2. That the right-of-way is unsuited as a non-motorized transportation facility, i.e. primarily for the use of • pedestrians, bicyclists, or equestrians. Staff believes that these findings can be made. The abandonment will not diminish any Circulation goal of the City. In addition, this short stretch of right-of-way is not a necessary link in any future path for alternative transportation. Under the Street and Highways Code this application qualifies as a Summary Vacation (short form) , as opposed to the General (long form) procedure. If the road has not been constructed and provision of utilities is not impacted, a Summary procedure is the proper course. This does not require the preparation of a separate notice of intent to abandon. When a right-of-way is abandoned, one-half of the right-of-way reverts to each of the adjacent property owners. In this case, the applicant owns the entire right-of-way. This is evidenced by ownership insured by the title report and the quitclaim deeds from the State of California relinquishing all rights to this portion of the right-of-way. Upon abandonment, one-half of the right-of-way reverts to Lot 9, while the other half becomes part of Lot 19. Each half section of right-of-way is then merged with its adjacent lot. 40 • CONCLUSIONS: This portion of the Coromar Ave, right-of-way is not necessary for future road or utility purposes. Coromar Ave. as constructed provides sufficient public and emergency access. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A - Location and Zoning Map Exhibit B - General Plan Land Use Map Exhibit C - Assessor' s Parcel Map Exhibit D - Letter from County Road Commissioner Exhibit E - Findings for Approval Exhibit F - Draft Resolution EXHIBIT A CITY OF ATASCADERO ZONING MAP r Iaox 187 -, ROAD ABANDONMENT 01-90 — COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ,AVE p1N�� SON A R 3z �.� i a 4 F . y 'N8q `. Nr, M (FH — - R F•Z Etft�copr MF-4 al 1 , i _ _ --_' n iq Lpq rt I i _p u 6- 1 i ; �` El ° s: $ �. �J a ,a A sa ,IP' �poq tiJ CQsr / ; ch vi rKn , ASCA\ERp pP` s \ �1 / Z , EXHIBIT B GENERAL PLAN AAP CITY OF ATASCADERO ROAD ABANDONMENT 01-90 �s■i ■ -Ir ie�.� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ° 09 r� _ L• IGENS H ` i I X� t l j M.F. �� a M B !'o SNI aEN g ETA T�_�. • M + - -- -� - I J- /' a — M9M4#7 R C O I A v � •, -` - �---+— I i TSi�, a- T koA FA i Ly `r cr <\ xsiTE c mm i B Loi C s f —ArvDi7E5PEN Y XIX . __j �_--° ' h '( �'A. 6 > � ^\\SLOB T4$�40Egb \� RAT'S 'p� -'�,� •�, 1�:. �i��/ (�yam`. � .."'�M �� ?F. ��.. EXHIBIT C „� ; CITY OF ATASCADERO ASSESSOR' S PARCEL MAP r loon _ ,e; / ROAD ABANDONMENT 01-90 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT C LOROMA R AVE. OF-WAY TO BE 2O �� 24 ' A BAN DONE D 2s -� 20 I.i� c N.tr9•.e OWN RSH IP OF FR-MB — A PPL 1 CA NT ,ti,,• a 25 /P.50f u.5 PR n Sp ,qb 10o! 17r f X10' .1 0(7' `y o • �' " 31 7c 0 W 3 Qp' I o, A r� 2 0 4' PMZg�6 13 Fez 3 \ S IS r 9.30 Oi7C.08 7s�+ 7 s5'3 m 6 0� Z 4 w H 9ti.3, �1 C �c 10,005 SF o O r + o u `,/ Og L ° o'. 17 4m to O `� Z'N N55•IOI� v_ J 21 a a9 S1os O ° 13 MB a'` „s' E 3 4 to 19,394SF ;. r roZ-rB 6 4 (o s; 8 m �' .• r FM 10,004 SF 9' '- 34 75.29 20 r 91. 272.9T Ply 28-/8 �N X12 ;P'.'I V ie4'OC'47"E. Z7. ,ri ° I09.22 9,3 t 25 CURggRlL s NOTE—THIS MAP IS FOR �D� AVE. ASSESSMENT v PURPOSES ONLY NOTE—ASSESSOR'S BLOCK d LOT NUMBERS SHO IN CIRCLE P1 IR MTWRr-Vr.Trrr- Hour a>tntt.�urnl n S1>VL�Is_0815P0� 1 ANU CUUNTY SU11VLVUI1 ' "t " rrT_ BIT D - L)EI)AR-FINILN-1, OF IROADS AND SURVEYOR COUIITHOUSL.ANNEX SAN 1-XV; 011!SI10, CALIFORNIA 93401 May 27, 1966 The Honorable Board of Supervisors File: R/,tiT 35588 Countv of San Luis Obispo Coromar Avenue San Luis Obispo, California AR 63 Subject: Requested Abandonment of a Portion of Coromar Avenue in Atascadero Gentlemen: Pursuant to your Board Order #61 of 28 March 1966, the Road Department _nvestigated and due to the facts uncovered, sub- mitted our findings to the District Attorney' s office for advice as to a request made by Messrs. Alvin Gray and John Baysdorfer for abandonment of a portion of Coromar Avenue in Atascadero. This portion of Coromar shows no physical evidence of use as a roadway. The subdivision map expressly withholds dedication and declares this a private road. we find no offer, acceptance, or other acquisition by the County. i The Road Department and the Planning Commission see no present ce _-_ P __ g or foreseeable need and, consequently, would recommend abandon- ment-if a public road. The District Attorney' s office advises an the basis of our investigation of the status of the road that abandonment proceedings are not in order as control of private roads are not within the County' s jurisdiction. We understand that Mr. Gray / Y and/or Mr. Ba sdorfer have secured < i sub- divider, deeds to this land from the successors to the b divider, namely, the Crocker Citizens Bank and/or Elmer Lee, Court appointed Trustee for the Atascadero Colony' s originalinal subdivider. e . job The Honorable Board of Supervisors May 27, 1966 ! pg. 2 It is suggested that the requestors might care to have their attorney or a title company offer an opinion as to the extent of their title. with the Quit Claim they have obtained, they may have valid clear title now. Respectfully, C�ARD GAL ' GHER Road Comi,.i, sioner-Surveyor b Exhibit E - Findings for Approval Road Abandonment 01-90 Portion of Coromar Ave. Charlesworth ENVIRONMENTAL FINDING: The proposed project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Class 5) . PROJECT FINDINGS: 1. The proposed abandonment is consistent with the General Plan. 2. The right-of-way is not suited for development as a non- motorized transportation facility, i.e. primarily for the use of pedestrians, bicyclists, or equestrians. 3. The right-of-way is not necessary for future road purposes of public access or safety. 4. The proposed abandonment will not adversely affect the provision of any existing or future utilities. EXHIBIT F . DRAFT RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO SUMMARILY VACATING A PORTION OF A ROAD PURSUANT TO STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE; PART 3 , PUBLIC STREETS, HIGHWAYS AND SERVICE EASEMENTS VACATION LAW; CHAPTER 4, SUMMARY VACATION; 8330 (BEING A PORTION OF COROMAR AVENUE) WHEREAS, Streets and Highways Code 8330 permits summary vacation of a street or highway by adoption of a resolution of summary vacation; and WHEREAS, this portion of Coromar Avenue, as shown on the attached Exhibit, has been determined to be actually superseded by reloca- tion and has been impassable for vehicular travel for at least five consecutive years and no public money was expended for its mainten- ance during that time; and WHEREAS, the vacation of this portion of Coromar Avenue, now superseded by relocation, will not work to cut off access to any person' s property which, prior to relocation, adjoined the street or highway to be vacated; and WHEREAS, the vacation of this portion of Coromar Avenue will not affect any in-place, in-use public utility facility or will not terminate a public service easement; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code 65402 , the City Planning Commission has recommended to the Council its finding that vacation of this portion of Coromar Avenue is in conformance with the City' s General Plan; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Streets and Highways Code 2381 , the City Planning Commission has recommended to the Council its finding that this portion of Coromar Avenue is not suitable or useful as a non- motorized transportation facility, or that adequate easements have been retained for such purposes. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved as follows : 1 . Based upon the above findings, the Council now finds and declares the above-described road portion superceded by relocation to be unuseable as a non-motorized transportation facility. 2 . Based upon the above findings, the Council now finds and declares the proposed vacation of this road portion superceded by relocation to be in conformance with the City' s General • Plan. 3 . The Council now summarily vacates, pursuant to Streets and Highways Code, Part 3, Chapter 4 , , 8330, that portion of Coromar Avenue shown on attached E.ehibit, subject to the following conditions of approval : a. The property owner shall indemnify and "hold harmless" the City from claims that may arise from the abandonment procedure. This agreement shall be_ reviewed and found acceptable by the City Attorney. b. A lot merger shall be completed prior to or simultaneous- ly to the recording of the abandonment resolution. C. All conditions of approval must be completed prior to or simultaneously to the recording of the abandonment resolution. 4 . That from and after the date this resolution is recorded with the County Recorder, the road portion shown on the attached Exhibit shall no longer be or constitute a street or highway. 5 . The Citv Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this Resolution of Summary Vacation, attested by him/her under seal, to be recorded without acknowledgement, or further proof in the office of the County Recorder. On motion by and seconded by the motion was approved by the following roll call vote: AYES : NOES: ABSENT: ADOPTED: By: ROLLIN DEXTER, Mayor City of Atascadero, California ATTEST: LEE DAYKA, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: RAY WINDSOR, City Manager PAGE THREE MINUTES EXCERPT - PLANNING COMMISSION - JUNE 5 . 1990 MOTION: By Commissioner Waage, secon y Commissioner Highland and carried 5 : recommend approval of Artiga Lane as th ad name to serve Lots 3, 4, 5 , and 6 of T -- 1057 (Dovica Tract) . CommiSs - Waage stated he would like to see developers pay f oad signs as a result of a subdivision in the future. 4. ROAD ABANDONMENT 02-90 : Application filed by Mary Charlesworth to consider abandoning a portion of the Coromar Avenue right-of-way. Subject site is located at 7350 Coromar Avenue. Mr. Davidson presented the staff report recommending approval of the request. He added that a portion of the right-of-way will be returned to Lot 7 which was not mentioned in the staff report. There was no public testimony. MOTION: By Commissioner Brasher, seconded by Commissioner Hanauer and carried 5 : 0 to recommend to the City Council that the right-of-way be abandoned as reflected in the draft ordinance contained in the staff report. tem A-3 - Approval of time extension for Tentative Parcel Map 2-87 at 9385 Vista Bonita (Metchik/Central Coast Engineering) Commissl er Waage asked for clarification concerning assurances that the open space easement will be protected enough. MOTION: By Com n ssioner Waage, seconded by Commissioner Highland d carried 5 : 0 to approve a time extension for Tentati Parcel Map 2-87 to April 26 , 1991 . C. INDIVIDUAL COMMENT 1 . Planning Commission Vice Chairperson Luna stated that a message needs to be relayed to the City Council concerning po icies as to when new roads are part of a subidivison, whose resp sibility will it be to bear the costs of the street sign Discussion followed. Mr. Davidson explained that in the case of the Dovi Tract, the tract was approved without a name so the above ction remedies this situation. s RESOLUTION 68-90 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO SUMMARILY VACATING A PORTION OF A ROAD PURSUANT TO STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE; PART 3 , PUBLIC STREETS, HIGHWAYS AND SERVICE EASrEMENTS VACATION LAW; CHAPTER 4, SUMMARY VACATION; 8330 (BEING A PORTION OF COROMAR AVENUE) WHEREAS, Streets and Highways Code 8330 permits summary vacation of a street or highway by adoption of a resolution of summary vacation; and WHEREAS, this portion of Coromar Avenue, as shown on the attached Exhibit, has been determined to be actually superseded by reloca- tion and has been impassable for vehicular travel for at least five consecutive years and no public money was expended for its mainten- ance during that time; and WHEREAS, the vacation of this portion of Coromar Avenue, now superseded by relocation, will not work to cut off access to any person' s property which, prior to relocation, adjoined the street or highway to be vacated; and WHEREAS, the vacation of this portion of Coromar Avenue will not affect any in-place, in-use public utility facility or will not terminate a public service easement; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code 65402 , the City Planning Commission has recommended to the Council its finding that vacation of this portion of Coromar Avenue is in conformance with the City' s General Plan; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Streets and Highways Code 2381 , the City Planning Commission has recommended to the Council its finding that this portion of Coromar Avenue is not suitable or useful as a non- motorized transportation facility, or that adequate easements have been retained for such purposes . NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved as follows: 1 . Based upon the above findings, the Council now finds and declares the above-described road portion superceded by relocation to be unuseable as a non-motorized transportation facility. 2 . Based upon the above findings, the Council now finds and declares the proposed vacation of this road portion superceded by relocation to be in conformance with the City' s General is Plan. 3 . The Council now summarily vacates, pursuant to Streets and Highways Code, Part 3 , Chapter 4 , 8330, that portion of Coromar Avenue shown on attached Exhibit, subject to the following conditions of approval : a. The property owner shall indemnify and "hold harmless" the City from claims that may arise from the abandonment procedure. This agreement shall be reviewed and found acceptable by the City Attorney. b. A jot merger shall be completed prior to or simultaneous- ly to the recording of the abandonment resolution. C . All conditions of approval must be completed prior to or simultaneously to the recording of the abandonment resolution. 4 . That from and after the date this resolution is recorded with the County Recorder, the road portion shown on the attached Exhibit shall no longer be or constitute a street or highway. 5 . The City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this Resolution of Summary Vacation, attested by him/her under seal , to be recorded without acknowledgement, or further proof in the office of the County Recorder. On motion by and seconded by the motion was approved by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES : ABSENT: DATE ADOPTED: By: ROBERT LILLEY, Mayor City of Atascadero, California ATTEST: LEE DAYKA, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: RAY WINDSOR, City Manager • '�,�r� � EXHIBIT ' ,.: . . CITY OF ATASCADERO i�_ RESOLUTIOfv 68-90 *��Na - . COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT .,I r� `+ 23 LORDMA R AVE. OF-WAY TD SF- P_ E 2O �,�� 2 a r= D � zs 20 OWN — RSH IP OF FR.MB APPI ICANT ti 2 � 24 la DO 2fe IIpS •y` •� 'i•' r m Z s 10 04 °+ A o o A 2 o ' �6 9 s O 9 pMZg 19 ? 3 \ 5 7 18 . S'3oc �i7C..8 ,5 „ (� Sr 9ti.3 SC _q I0,005 SF S Qo_ O ► �.J o� J O LO r 21 �N as so sz.� L 5>•ic e1 13 M8' 17 f a 5 v(p• 19,J94SF n r 'o2.�e 9 (D"4 fo 8 m c. o+ m 20 N '�� •p 11 n .� 'f s N l� d d V• I� � N .� 10,004 SF 0 5 f-7.30 w �_ 272_pi. PM 2B !6 AN +•e l2 91.)4 �� 9 75.ZQ 20 V i.4•JC'l4"[. 7T' h22 97' y3 2s CURBARIL Z�e NOTE—THIS MAP IS FOR ie v ASSESSMENT AYE. PURPOSES ONLY NOTE—ASSESSOR'S BLOCK d LOT NUMBERS SHO IN CIRCLE RSFBRT TO CITY COUNCIL CT"',Or A.'TASC ER0 � : � A i. C-4` Through. Ray Windaar, City Manager " meet 0Pat*. From: Henry $]q►+ an". Commuaity Dev,. Dir-AL vila Ro TPM its') SUIJ9 fi Considaration' ofproposed Findings for n4nisl for:pre�pos ac "`<divi�ion pf parpal containing apF+ro mately 3..4 acres into "two- lots c i�ais� inq and 2. acres aach at- 75t? Cad' lits ,. Thc+ aa Vic& (continued from4/=24/90 and .6/26/90 City Council xaeatIU9,0 SAL"RGRt1t1 ' , , At ths4 Council 1,8 ,tune 26th meeting, there, was conttnued conkiaia tion + ' the appea pf 'Thomas, ranch 6f' trig recommended denial of this , propoeed LL lot d,i'visi n , Action council was, to darty t ze " app l; on a i vote. and to di`�tect at f ` to bring, bask ndings for neraial. 'these ri ding hi " F` ark draft,ad following reflection un ` the Council,'a diacu 'ion ,ani. arse included ,ss -exhibit A; HE:pS Attachments: Exhibit .A - Propo sed Findings for -Dani al, cc: "Momas Bench P; L •r x k 1 t NOTE: SIM 'IMKS F 'DMdAL OF-4-IM.2 89 �RENOT $♦ ��Aqqy{�. yp�Fy }yi�� J��yjy{. [yr�y l i•/' 4V� �h .1.� \d.# 6# AP �,s iYMV1lY'.T Sv J WI4L BE Dl , ' , AS 5IBI I e l ' � 1 � � r r, s� � r 7.� p. F ��¢ •S. i , k 4 4 `v S i Zl � 1 aF, r � - * 1 # PUBLIC REVIEW COPY PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE FROM COUNTER Agenda Item: C. 1 City Council Meeti 9 July 10, 1990 EXHIBIT A - Findings for Denial Tentative Parcel Map 02-89 7508 Carmelita (Bench) APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL: JULY 10, 1990 ENVIRONMENTAL FINDING: The proposed project will not have a significant impact on the environment. The Negative Declaration prepared for the project is adequate. MAP FINDINGS: 1 . The proposed map is not consistent with the General Plan. Evidence: Residential Policy Proposal No. 10 states , in part, that "Lot splits shall be thoroughly evaluated and lie in accordance with community plans and principles . " (P57 ) . Further, under the Public Safety Policy Proposal of the Open Space and Conservation Elements of the General Plan. "The banks and bed of Atascadero Creek" is listed amongst "Areas of open space available for recreation that shall be pre- served. . . . . . " (P76) . The proposed lot split is comprised primarily of a portion of the Atascadero Creek Reservation and a narrow adjoining bench. Development of an additional home site would conflict with these plan policies . 2 . The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is not consistent with the applicable General Plan. Evidence: The proposed building site on parcel 2 would not have a setback from the original Atascadero Creek Reserve boundary. Policy No. 2 of the Open Space and Conservation Element of the General Plan states, " Building setback requirements shall be established along the banks of both creeks (Atascadero and Graves Creeks) to insure the uninterrupted flow of the streams and ensure access to the recreational use of the creeks . " (P77 ) . 3 . The site is not physically suitable for the proposed type of development. Evidence: Residential Policy Proposal No. 9 states that, "Hazard areas (geologic, landslide, flood, etc. ) shall have appropriate development standards . " (P57 ) . Towards this end, the property was zoned Special Recreation (Flood Hazard) whose purpose (Section 9-3 .411) states, in part, "This zone is X established to provide suitable locations and standards for the development of recreational facilities on land in private ownership. " Preservation Policy No. 3 of the Open Space and Conservation Element states that, "Creek reserves shall be retained for park and recreational use. " (P70) . A majority of the area of proposed parcel 2 is within the Atascadero Creek Reservation which, in turn, is subject to 100 year floods and/or is within a recreational easement. 4 . The site is not physically suitable for the proposed density of development. Evidence: In 1983, the Planning Commission reduced the proposed subdivision of Creek Reservation No. 6 from 4 lots to 3 lots, including parcel 111" which is the parcel proposed for division as TPM 02-89 . The Commission indicated that it was their intent to not approve any further division of this property. Subsequent Planning Commissions and City Councils in 1985 and 1987 denied requests by the applicant for further division of this same property. The physical constraints on development recited in Finding I3o. 3 conflicts with the den- sity of development proposed. 5 . The proposed map would be contrary to purposes of the City' s Subdivision Ordinance. Evidence: Section 11-1 . 002 of the Subdivision Ordinance includes the following statements of purpose: "E . To protect and enhance the value of land and improvements and to minimize conflicts among the uses of land and build- ings . " Clearly, the preponderance of neighborhood testimony against the addition of another homesite at the location proposed speaks to the evidence of land use conflicts . " "G. To protect the natural resources of the community, including topographic and geologic features , solar exposure, water courses, wildlife habitats and scenic vistas, and to increase reasonable public access to such resources . " The proposed second homesite would conflict with historic drainage patterns, crowd wildlife habitat, impair the scenic vista from Carmelita Avenue, and discourage reasonable public access to the creekway. " 6 . The proposed map would conflict with the flag lot standards of the City' s Subdivision Regulations. Section 11-8. 209(B) of the City' s Subdivision Ordinance requires that, "The original lot shall have frontage on a dedicated street of at least the minimum length required by these regulations for the zone in which it is located, plus the accessway required to potential rear lots. " Curbaril Avenue is neither dedicated nor improved and the only practi- cal access is via easements to Carmelita. Hence, proposed Lot I 2 would further violate the subdivision regulations which requires that, "E . The lot farthest from the street shall own the accessway in fee. Other lots using the accessway shall have an access and utility easement over it. " Evidence: Section 11-8. 209 (D) of the City' s Subdivision Ordinance requires that flag lots provide for "a 10 (ten) foot setback along any accessway, whether easement or lot line. " The existing dwelling on parcel 1 does not meet this standard. 7 . The proposed map would create a lot with a depth-to-width ratio greater than 3 : 1 and the City Council can not find for an exception pursuant to Section 11-11 .002 of the Subdivision Ordinance. Evidence: Section 11-8.206 of the Subdivision Ordinance states that, "Lots with a ratio of depth-to-width greater than three shall not be permitted unless there is adequate assur- ance that deep lot subdivision will not occur or that deep lot subdivision and subsequent development will be accomplished without detriment to adjacent properties . " The proposed subdivision would result in the creation of a lot that exceeds the 3 : 1 depth-to-width ratio. The history of subdivision applications for this property shows that deep lot subdivisions were originally proposed in 1985 and again in 1987 . The applicant' s intent to create a parcel is evidenced by the following notation on proposed parcel 2 : "1 . 2 ac. Note: First option to purchase parcel 3 is held by the City of Atascadero for Recreational Purposes . " ), PIC AL IS SI ` • ♦jam .��.�. ♦ `sem � � � ... BIWA IMP Ong up P'f OR it �'//��,`,� SM, � ' �!!��f� "'�*� ..•� ' RJ .• vp t � EXHIBIT C CITY OF • .y ATASCADERO TPM 02-89 RNs. M4 1 — '` COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Tentative Parcel DEPARTMENT / ` r fat A is ,w y t f j , 1 i CC RIS REPORT TO CITY,"COUNCIL CTTY OF ATASCADER ends ltd: 0-2 Through: Ray Windsor, City Manager Meeting Date:: 7/1:0/90 Via: Henn Engen, Community Development ,Dire ctor From: , Lisa Schicker, City Arborist � 1 Proposal for interim Tree Replacement standards ' RECO NDATibN ;For each tree to be removed- ' accept a base replacement 'ratio of two : for one same species, 15 gallon planted and maintained tree or an, "in lieu" contribution to the Tree ;Replacement rand hf 0� per tree.: RACKORatrnm: Tha Tree ordinance currently specifies that Live not tray which. are _. removed shall be replaced with a. minimum of one .15 ` _gallon,:1 s e e, species tree for each tree to be reanoved,# A $1D, fee was used as a basis, for calculating replacement costs an the�s' tom' amount .the City hes b+�en using_ for "in lieu" donations to the 'Tree, Oeplacement .rund. ' After conducting research and surveying Calif,orUiOt, cities and consulting arborists, 2would like to provide Council With infr�ati*u thou°should explain why '`recommendations have changed. ANALYSM. According to a recent survey - of California cities in oak woodland areas, over 46% have scene kind 'of tree ordinance and policy regarding, tree removals and a21- of these Ordinances sr have some ethod, for' replacing. trees that are to be removed. t"Stage ,of Oak Management by municipal by the nt�egrated� Hardwood Manag teat Progr pec er 1988) The methods for':deetermin ng pl�anting' rat o or m+ eta > a ounts vary widely some cities accept only replacement, plantings sad. some cities. accept both replacements ,and "in lieu", donations� The ratio of removed to r`e�?la+cament `varies` from 2:1 on up depend :ng, Qh conditions. All of the cities: surveyed did not have one standard that was ,used iii every., case, because the �ratio'.'was dependent on conditions, such a `side,.. location, age, . number;of trees on the property, etc„ In every ,case,., however, the m�c�'1;iikum replacement ratio used was greatei • that-one for..0ne. A an example, Paso Robles requires 2 -for '4, San Luis Obispo, County requires 4 for 1 and A=royo Grande requires 3-5 for` `l (.all 15 �a21on replacements), and Thousand Oaks requires- 2, 241 box and 1* 36" box_ for every tree removed that is 2"' - 48" dbh in side. Another methdo that is used requires, 'that trees be replated dbh for dbh, meaning that, a 20"' &h, tree would meed replacements tuk, a3.. that;. A standard- 15 gallon cak ha►sa:- average `dbh of 1", t� er+efre 20 trees of this size" would be requ#ed to repiece the"resegval t�'f' A�3e 2tf"dbh tree A stricter method used-by 's ome -c'ities,,requires t##t .roploc `ient value be determined' by the' crass -seotion l value of` the- tree': t o {at dbk height,. In the; example ;i"k�G�e, , A .2+5" dbh tree , has, a - cr#e sectian$l value of ` 3`1 square ;►chess sand a 15;.. gallon as f with e, t1"=, h hasp, a cross seetic�n'al value of ,,85 i rhes therefore 40fi tri,*'' <.wrc►u d be` required`:to-repl, aoe one 200, dbh tree,., - , , r If an applicant is unable .toplant.;tie:. epleceieent trees, s: ties" 'have attempted to come up with a' mi netssr r a bunt that- would . cover -their ,costs for planting ;the trees fcar the applicsant h" Tree Rlsp, acemeut Fund 'is estakblishsd to receive thosse..pontess and I used for`r,J1.a tixrg tete replacemm an "public and/or-- px nate `land. at tS in; S ,.,,,,Luis :Obispo County and City have,ranged an ere. °from . $1_40 _ ', �sa4, once a ��11 depending on ' conditions w Provided,. °below ,, - is an, estii to using Atascadero' figures of "�+rhet it wrc�u�d cast the City to plasnt#� sn�►iz�tain a 15 galloxi oak for two years 1s 'gal asrs risk °tree $7fl retail, $45-:0-1ss581e- Gopher re (bulk rate) - Deer Penne.- and sttakess I bulk, rat $20 , Fertilizer or, Soil amendments $5 Planting 'Time (estimate 2 rsons ,` 1 our : 2t# hour $40, Vehicle $15;hcsur * 1 hour $15' Backhoe I $45/hour * hour $45 catering Tle:. (estimate -.5/hour/week * 16 a eussssaeac weeks * 2 years * $-2q/hour * . ,1 .person , $320 vehicle for -Watering :"I 6 Khpurs $24f Total:, (based-, an wh*lessale rices $7 Total s sx eludint-vehicle:+wosstss j . $49 Even if the vehicle . 1co tz vire ibsozlr ed. the cost -of iianting .and maintenan�e. is ajxost.4,500"- N In Visalia, a- C*trun nurse .provides s all+ r.ttr+eess freer of aha=ge =tc : residents who Faust resxrove-..trees=• Multifamily and .re"siden- S` are requtred to provide their Own trews for replacements., ', provide this service t4 the community- this av ,bten strongly -recomm*iuding, 'ferr- ,►ur, City as welI. They a1 +o sell,M arx° �reess' to the pubs,°io for.rplanti g, a si;'th it :stock is naturesgrcwn�<, Some ':cities use the valueslswssed o» -,h `�m a� "valuation :cif L*udsssapo Trees,A* h'rub> d Cst i r ,Flus. - � i to, .the Methods ; and .,' Procedures' foz� �► a►i 1.rig Assr<e>pit * Flaatss-'nth: *ditit�ax'° , publ'iShOd by .the-ISA:-in 194E to- determine the value ofmet"uur*_'`trees; recent ,studies_.,. 'have shown bh t :the' JC04X of s a City tree *th. a "fifty . year. lifespan ranges rs ' $57,-,040, .,to ' 162,4 00. This , mai hod of I' evaluation uses location, condition, size and species to come up with the monetary value. This method has been court tested and upheld across the country. In light of this research, a proposal for a base fee of $200 or a two for one replacement standard is reasonable and defendable. All native trees that get planted do not survive; in order to sustain our forest, a replacement ratio that is greater than one for one is necessary. After calculating the actual cost of planting trees , the cash amount is less than half of what it would actually cost the City to provide the service of planting trees for applicants who are unable to do so. i REPORT TO CI'T'Y' COUNCIL CI T OF: ATASCADERO Agenda Zte a: 0-3 4 g0 t A T?s�te; Through: Ray Windsor, City anagen, M e q Via: • Henry Engen, Community. DeVelcpment Director From: Lisa scbcier, City Arborist SmACT: CONSIDERATION Or CI'T'Y COEi CII.' TREE SURC016HTTTZE'`S DRAFT RE-i inz or THE 'T"REE ORDINANCE FOR REFERRAL TO THO;PLANNING COMMISSION FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND RECOMMENDATIONS, E �_ BACTGOROUND A" long sequence of meetings events. and document writing• and: rewriting have taken place before presenting a. revised dreft r, of' Tre' a t�id .nehee #165 before Council. These efforts can be, attributed hi"etor.,i ally, to the "Tree Committee , past Planning Comsaiss ons and City` Count 1 and the Community Development pment a partment. -More recently, the ,tasks ` 4voIved with revising the Tree ©rdiniance have b'een accomplisbes�., by the point efforts` of, Radlr os # , oak treelplsrining consultant: and f+ riaer: Community Development Director for the, city ofsan, . I.nis: c�biepO,, I..isa schicker, City . :Arborist, Henry Engen, Community De"velo" ent Dir+ectgr,f Ray Windsor City, : Manager� Art Montandorr* Citi 7�t orriey �n� Alden Shiers and Rollin Dexter, the City Council. Free .Subcci.tt.ee. A summary, describing the sequence of events that }lave led to the most recent draft of :nevi-si.ons .to the Tree Ordinance Humber`' T 68 is provided' as an atts°a hmeritf. This lengthy 'chronology., of events perhaps demonstrat-es� the; thoroughness of, review that "this d'ot ent= hea. 41,r_etidy received from pity Staff` axa the Tree subs .ammttee DISCUSSION Or_CONTENTS-., A brief description of the current draft and ab: attachment des ri.bing the: "Tree.standards `and Guidelines" cr rr alt l uaic er oing, ina re r:ie l should .assist Council in understanding .the pure ►se` snt : nten cif' the current drift and brew it differs :from the past ,ordinsanca.= Highlights of the proposed new ordinanceinclude! 1. ; The new, ordinance ,is ,shorter in length because have attempted to simplify its content' together with transferr inq,, many"---O the d+�tails related to procedures in an accompa►nyi.ng 'x docu nt entitled "Tree standards and Guidelines" . The deta ls. cif the' "Tree Standards and Guidelines" shall be complete for the ' Planning Co i-a ion hearing,.' however; a table of contents (that' briefly describts • the, acument), has been provided` as an attachment. 2. The new ordinance'perta. ns to only native trees'. 3. The 'new ordinance is intended to be easier , to`- fallow. 1 r ' interpret. 4. The new ordinance waives''all' f4ei for dead'. r emovai. 5. The now ordinance strongly ' encouragea the publ%._to, 'cause the, services, of the City Arboriat for, _as41oatance and insformAt on in' advance o - a project,.; ' 6. The,aaw ordinance a:ttempts to dafiu4 the term r aSapabl mess* in a< way Uat can be more 449i ly inter nd Undorstocd`: I. The n+awY, ordinance propose�' that than City;; ballot, heaar , a�, tree removal requests for ttaas und*V'24« S. the naw ordinance pro sas' that. the Planning :Comxivs'Ion, heaar all tree r *oval requesta: for treas" 24" ` and over {Cu` k* 'City; Council hears all requests for tre4a{ guar 24" dbhj . 9 . All .decisions relating to tree removal: are 'app�s�sl +�s`tc City Council. 10. The rtes o'k6ihand'a dafinas mathods� €or`replacing'trseea Ttb►Bit removed: 11. The, n+ w `ordinance. v a t"h,e iapecial d f niti+ �s, Razrita Tri" grad de inee a n+ w do t s *'.., t e+asx,; nj;knt" an braes" _ t can be adopt. for ansa`protion r, 12., The new' ordinance alien-i-pates thy' Council.-approved .,arborist "hiring list" and anA las tr;ae' prdtsa+it on plans 'to bas prepar+�" . site plannara. , �. 13. Tbenew ordinance ; mov+ao the "Tread C r nan � a, phos. 4nits ordinance -and " rbvid+ � . "' ater� aiini tiv+a ` ii �i'ty which degas ten ut the arbbri.aat -funactions in. 411RE momc,7 It ' is recommended,tthat' City- �a(:i � tefer _ � yr4ry :4*4, Tr`aF�e Ordinance 'and ad' dompany' "Tree Standardan ',a�m Gui:dss in ra' to tannin" ' Co saaictn f+ r -public',,hssaring and rec a�snaatiaau'. Attachments,: Chronology, of tvents Draft Revs s*d Crdinansce Draft Tablt cf ont ntst-' 4r "Tree 'stAndotds andl:' ..� ' G1�a�.da�llnapt�� Current Ord n6k: %pril, :/l9aa �r i Attachment: Chronology of Events Leading to the .Current Tree Ordinance Draft January 25 , 1989 . This was the date of a joint study session of City Council and Planning Commission to determine the needs for revisions to the existing Tree Ordinance #168 . February, March and April, 1989 . staff wrote revisions based on ideas that came out of that study session. May 23 , 1989 . Planning Commission made comments on the fourth Draft Revision of the Tree ordinance and Randy Rossi was asked to make comments on that draft and the Planning Commission comments . June 28 , 1989 . Randy Rossi submitted a six page report and ordinance critique to City Manager. Summer, 1989 . Randy Rossi agreed to produce a major rewrite of the ordinance based on the comments he provided in his June 28 report. Sometime during the summer, he also accepted the position of interim Community Development Director for the City of San Luis Obispo. August 7 , 1989 . City Arborist began working for the City part-time. Randy Rossi was retained as consultant to assist Arborist . He informed City Manager that he would attempt to have an ordinance draft by late October. December, 1989 . Because of consuming amounts of time in his interim position, Randy Rossi was unable to produce the draft on schedule. Randy then phoned all Council persons and explained his situation to them. January 12 , 1990 . After working with the existing ordinance for almost five months, City Arborist provided City Manager with an initial critique of the difficulties of enforcing Tree Ordinance 168 . January 31 , 1990 . City Manager asked City Arborist to participate in the rewrite process . Arborist produced memo estimating dates of completion and tentative hearing schedule, first meeting to be held February 26 , 1990 . February 26 , 1990 . City Manager and Arborist had first meeting to discuss new Tree ordinance outline. Randy Rossi was unavailable for three weeks and could not attend. March 14 , 1990 . First meeting between Randy Rossi, Ray Windsor, Lisa Schicker, Art Montandon, Henry Engen, Rollin Dexter and Alden Shiers to review the proposed changes to ordinance. Rossi announces that he is resigning and returning to the Bay area and that his last available day would be April 17 , 1990 . March and April, 1990. City Arborist and Randy Rossi continued to revise and edit the draft ordinance. 0 April 17 , 1990 . Second full meeting for Rossi, Windsor, Schicker, Engen, Montandon, Dexter and Shiers to discuss most recent draft. Changes were made, Arborist was asked to revise one more time and give to City Attorney for his final review. April 20, 1990 . Arborist gave Attorney copy of latest revision. June 6 , 1990 . Third meeting between Schicker, Windsor, Engen, Montandon, Dexter and Shiers to discuss ordinance draft after Montandon' s review. Additional comments were incorporated into the draft. June 20, 1990 . Final review of changes to draft by Engen, Windsor, Montandon and Schicker. Final draft version produced and attached to this memo. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CtTX OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING CHAPTER 19 OF TITLE 2 AND SECTION 9-4.155 AND ADDING CHAPTERS 11 AND 12 TO TITLE 9 OF THE ATASCADERO MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING TREE PROTECTION The City Council of the City of Atascadero, California, does ordain as follows: Section 1. Chapter 19 of Title 2 and Section 9-4.155 of the Atascadero Municipal Code are hereby repealed. Section 2. Chapter 11 is added to Title 9 of the Atascadero Municipal Code to read as follows: Chapter 11 . Native Tree Ordinance. Sec. 9-11 .01 . Purpose and hent. Preservation of natural flora and fauna is a basic community goal of the Atascadero General Plan. The trees of Atascadero are valued community assets. The purpose of this ordinance is to establish regulations for the installation, maintenance, preservation, protection, and selected removal of native trees within the city limits. In establishing these procedures, it is the City' s intent to encourage the preservation, maintenance, and regeneration of a healthy urban forest. This enhances other values "that Atascadero holds for its community; among these are: clean air and water, soil conservation, aesthetics, property values, and an ecological diversity that will ensure that Atascadero will continue to be a desirable place to live. Sec. 9-11 .02. Applicability. (a) The provisions of this chapter, with a set of accom- panying "Tree Standards and Guidelines" adopted by resolution, shall apply to all native trees two inches (2") dbh or greater. It shall be illegal to intentionally harm, damage and/or cause the death or decline of a native tree (as defined by the City Council) or remove a native tree without a City-issued Tree Removal Permit. (b) The provisions of this chapter shall apply to all public and private property and trees within the City of Atascadero, and to any person, firm, corporation, and public or private utility company doing work within the city limits. (c) Fees for Services. Fees may be charged for services and shall be set forth and amended by resolution. ORDINANCE NO. Page 2 Sec. 9-11 .03 . Definitions. (a) "Damage" means any intentional action or gross negligence which causes injury, death or disfigurement of a tree. Actions include, but are not limited to, cutting, girdling, poisoning, overwatering, unauthorized relocation or transportation of a tree, or trenching, excavating, altering the grade or paving within the dripline of a tree. (b) "Dbh" means "diameter at breast height" , specifically four feet six inches (4' 6") above natural grade. (c) "Dripline" means the outermost edge of the tree's canopy projected straight down to the ground surface. As depicted on a plan view, the dripline appears as an irregularly shaped circle, which is a line drawn around the ends of the outermost branches of a tree projected straight down to the soil surface. (d) "Hazardous" means presenting an immediate danger to people or existing structures. (e) "Removal" means the physical destruction, displacement or removal of a tree, or portions of a tree, caused by poisoning, cutting, burning, relocation for transplanting, bulldozing or other mechanical, chemical or physical means. (f) "Native Tree" means a naturally occurring species having a dbh of two inches (2") or greater which appears in the "Native Trees" section of the City' s "Tree Standards and Guidelines" , adopted by resolution. (g) "Tree Protection Plan" means a plan that shows how specific trees shall be protected during development and land use related work. . (h) "Tree Pruning" means the cutting, detachment or separation of any limb, branch or root greater than four inches (4") diameter (measured at the point of detachment) from a native tree. Sec. 9-11 .04 ., Adoption of Standards. The "Tree Standards and Guidelines" set forth procedures, guidelines, and .standards that shall be used to implement the Native Tree Ordinance. They shall be used to provide details about preservation, maintenance, installation, protection, regeneration, and select removal of trees. They shall be adopted and amended by resolution of the City Council and have the force of law. ORDINANCE NO. Page 3 Sec. 9-11 .05 . Roles and Responsibilities. (a) City Arborist ("Natural Resource Specialist") . The City Natural Resource Specialist, herein referenced as the City Arborist, shall provide information, review building, development and Tree Protection Plans, visit sites, and make recommendations and determinations on native tree removals for trees less than twenty-four inches (24") dbh in size. (b) Planning Commission. Decisions on native tree removals of twenty-four inches (24") dbh-size or larger shall be made by the Planning Commission. Decisions regarding native tree removal, tree protection, and tree replacement made by the City Arborist may be appealed to the Planning Commission. (c) City Council. Decisions related to native trees made by the Planning Commission are appealable to the City Council. (d) Site Planner. These persons are qualified professionals who are hired by applicants to prepare Tree Protection Plans. Refer to "Tree Standards and Guidelines" for more information. . (e) Private Arborist. These persons are licensed professionals who are hired to do physical work on trees in Atascadero. Refer to "Tree Standards and Guidelines" for more information. Sec. 9-11 .06. Tree Removal . (a) Permit Required. Except as set forth - in (b) below, Tree Removal Permits shall be required for the removal of any native tree two inches (2") dbh or greater, and for pruning of more than twenty-five percent (25%) of the live canopy or limb (s) greater than four inches (4") dbh at the point of detachment in native trees. (b) Exemptions. A Tree Removal Application or Permit is not required for: (1) Emergency situations which cause hazardous or dangerous conditions that have serious potential to cause immediate damage to persons or improvements on real property. Such situations must be reported to and approved by the City. (2) Trees planted, grown, and maintained as part of a licensed nursery or tree farm business. ORDINANCE NO. Page 4 (3) Tree pruning that affects limbs less than four inches (4") diameter (at the point of detachment) and less than twenty-five percent (25%) of a tree' s live canopy within one year' s time. Pruning on native trees shall be done according to the adopted "ISA Tree Pruning Standards" . (c) Dead tree removals are subject to the procedures outlined in Sections 9-11.07 through 9-11 .09 below, but all related fees shall be waived. Sec. 9-11 .07 . Applications and Permits for Tree Removal. (a) Early Consultation. All applicants are encouraged to use the services of the City Arborist before site development that may involve the removal of trees. Early consultation shall be a factor used in determining whether proposed improvements can be reasonably designed to avoid the need for tree removal. (b) Content. The content of the Tree Removal Application and Permit shall be set forth in the Tree Standards and Guidelines" . (c) Posting.g All treesro osed for removal P p shall be identified b the applicant plicant for field inspection as set P_ forth i " " P n the Tree Standards and Guidelines" , utilizingCit rovide a City-provided d i identification sign visible from the street and flagging in tape. P When a Tree Removal Permit is issued, the City shall post a copy of the permit in City Hall and the applicant shall post a copy on site for a fourteen (14) day public appeal period. Refer to "Tree Standards and Guidelines" for details. (d) The application is reviewed and theP ermit is either denied o approved PP roved with conditions. Sec. 9-11 .08. Required Findings for Tree Removal. The applicant must provide the factual data to make the required finding (s) . At least one of these findings must be made in order to approve a Tree Removal Application: (a) The tree has been dead for at least onerow ' g ing season. (b) The tree is diseased or injured beyond reclamation. (c) The tree is crowded, dictating thinning. (d) The tree is interfering with existing utilities and/or structures. i ORDINANCE NO. Page 5 (e) The tree is inhibiting sunlight needed for existing and/or proposed active or passive solar heating or cooling. (f) The tree is obstructing proposed improvements that cannot be reasonably designed to avoid the need for removal. (1) Factors to be considered in determining "reasonableness" include: (i) Early consultation with the City Arborist; (ii) Consideration of practical design alternatives; and (iii) Provision of cost comparisons for practical design alternatives. (2) A design of a proposed improvement shall be unreasonable if it requires: (i) The removal of more desirable trees; (ii) Extraordinary costs; (iii) Causes significant impacts to the environment; or (iv) Eliminates all reasonable use of the property. Sec. 9-11 .09 . Evaluative Criteria for Tree Removal. The following criteria will be considered when evaluating a Tree Removal Application: (a) The potential effect that tree removal could have on topography, knowing that hilltops, ravines, streambeds, and other natural water courses are more environmentally sensitive than flat or gentle sloping lands. (b) The potential effect that tree removal could have on soil retention and erosion from increased flow of surface waters. (c) The potential effect that tree removal could have on significantly increasing the noise level. (d-) The potential effect that tree removal could have on the ability of existing vegetation to reduce air movement and wind velocity. (e) The potential effect that tree removal could have on significantly reducing available wildlife habitat or result in the displacement of desirable species. (f) Aesthetics. ORDINANCE NO. Page 6 (g) The number, size, species, condition, and location of trees to be removed. (h) The special need to protect existing blue and valley oaks because of regeneration problems. (i) The cumulative environmental effects of tree removal. Sec. 9-11 .10. Tree Protection Plan. (a) Tree Protection Plans shall be required if any listed activity occurs within twenty feet (201 ) of the trunk of any native tree. Activities include, but are not limited to, the following: remodeling or new construction, grading, road building, utility trenching, etc. A Tree Protection Plan shall be included as part of the submittals for a road plan, plot plan, precise plan, building permit and/or conditional use permit. The "Tree Standards and Guidelines" set forth the information required in all Tree Protection Plans. (b) Early consultation with the City Arborist is available and strongly encouraged. (c) Implementation. The Native Tree Protection Plan shall be in place (and verified in writing .by the applicant) before applicants shall receive any City permits to begin work . Refer to "Tree Standards and Guidelines" for details. (d) Tree Protection During Grading and Construction. The "Tree Standards and Guidelines" set forth the details regarding these methods. (e) Surety Requirements. In large projects or projects involving extremely valuable trees, the City may require a surety prior to issuance of entitlement. Determination for use of the surety will be based on complexity of the project and number of trees being impacted. The type of surety must be approved by the City Attorney. Tree Protection and Regeneration. Tree Removal Conditions. Tree Removal Permits shall be conditioned on one or more of the following: (a) Planting Trees. Replacement plantings (either on or off site) shall be required to help sustain and regenerate Atascadero' s urban forest. The number of replacements shall be determined by the conditions (size, species, age) of the trees ORDINANCE NO. Page 7 removed; a minimum of a one for one, same species, fifteen (15) gallon sized tree shall be required. The "Tree Standards and Guidelines" set forth guidelines for . tree replacement in detail and also describe methods to insure that replacement trees are planted with horticulturally sound techniques. (b) Tree Replacement Fund. This fund has been established to receive cash in lieu of planting replacements. The City shall use these monies to plant, protect, and maintain trees in locations designated as receiver sites. Refer to "Tree Standards and Guide- lines" for details. (c) Conservation Easements. Conservation easements can be used in lieu of tree replacements. Such easements protect the land upon which the trees are located. Sec. 9-11 .12 . TZee Abatement,;, Nuisances ,, Pest and Disease. (Reserved) Sec. 9-11 .13 . Fgrestry and Woodlot Management. (Reserved) Sec. 9-11 .14 . Procedures for Public Projects. (a) Definition. Public projects are tree-related actions initiated by any department of the City of Atascadero. (b) Binding City to Tree Ordinance. Public initiated projects will comply with the Tree Ordinance unless explicitly exempted by the City Council. (c) Procedure to Seek Exemption. Applicant from the City shall submit a written statement describing the project and reason that an exemption should be granted. Sec . 9-11 .15 . Appeal . Appeals shall be filed in accordance with Sec. 9-1.111 of this Title. For purposes of an appeal, the decisions of the City Arborist shall be considered as a decision of the Community Development Department. Sec, 9-11 .16. Enforcement. (a) Penalties. Violations of this Chapter are specifically declared misdemeanors, and upon conviction may be punished as set forth in Chapter 3 of Title 1 of the Atascadero Municipal Code. (b) Restitution. It has been determined that trees within the City of Atascadero are valuable assets to the citizens of this community, and as a result of loss or damage to these trees, ORDINANCE NO. Page 8 the public should be recompensed. In addition to any penalties provided by (a) above, any person who damages a tree in violation of the terms of this Chapter is responsible for proper restitution and/or conditions as described in Sec. 9-11.11. The City may bring a civil action for restitution to enforce this section. (c) Stop Work . In cases of nonconformance with Native Tree Protection Requirements, the City Arborist or inspecting official shall immediately issue a Stop Work Order until all requirements have been met. Should unauthorized work or nonconformance lead to tree removal or damage (as defined) , the City Arborist or inspecting official shall also issue a Stop Work Order. (d) Conditions and Signed Agreements. Should unauthorized work or nonconformance lead to tree removal or damage (as defined) , the City Arborist may also require conditions as described in Sec. 9-11.11. Section 3 . Chapter 12 is added to Title 9 of the Atascadero Municipal Code to read as follows: Chat/ er 12. Landmark Trees. Sec. 9-12.01 . Landmark Tref:, Defined. "Landmark Tree" means anv native or non-native tree recognized by City Council resolution for its age, size, location, historical and/or cultural significance. Sec. 9-12.02 . Landmark Tree Protection. Any tree (native or non-native) may receive protection by City Council resolution for its age, size, location, historical and/or cultural significance. Landmark Trees receive the same protection and are subject to all conditions set forth in Chapter 11 of Title 9 regarding native trees. They may not be removed without City Council approval. Section 4. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is held to be unconstitutional or invalid in whole or in part by any court, such decision shall not affect the validity or effectiveness of the remaining portions of this ordinance, or any part thereof. If the application of any provision of this ordinance or any person, property or circumstance is found to be unconstitutional or invalid in whole or in part by any court, such decision shall be limited to the person, property or circumstance immediately involved in the controversy, and the application of such provision to other persons, property, and circumstances shall not be affected. ORDINANCE NO. Page 9 Section 5 . The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published once within fifteen (15) days after its passage in the Atascadero News, a newspaper of general circulation, printed, published, and circulated in the City in accordance with Section 36933 of the Government Code; shall certify the adopting and posting of this ordinance; and shall cause this ordinance and this certification together with proof of posting to be entered into the Book of Ordinances of the City. Section 6. This ordinance shall go into effect and be in full force and effect at 12: 01 a.m. on the 31st day after its passage. On motion by and seconded by the foregoing ordinance is approved by the following roll call vote: Ayes: Noes: Absent: Date Adopted: By +ROBERT B. LILLEY, Mayor City of Atascadero, California Approved as to form: ARTHER R. MONTANDON, City Attorney Approved as to content: 4 RAY WINDSOR, City Manager ARM: fr ORD: 005 6/29/90 Attachment: TREE STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES A document to accompany the Native Tree Ordinance and the Landmark Tree Ordinance (Proposed for Adoption by City Council Resolution) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. NATIVE TREES 2. USE OF PRIVATE ARBORIST/OTHER PROFESSIONALS 3. TREE PRUNING GUIDELINES 4. NATIVE TREE REMOVAL APPLICATIONS AND PERMITS 5. TREE REMOVAL POSTING PROCEDURES 6. DEAD TREES 7. REVIEW PROCESS 8. APPEALS 9. TREE PROTECTION PLAN GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS 10. TREE PLANTING AND TRANSPLANTING GUIDELINES 11. TREE REPLACEMENT AND MITIGATION GUIDELINES 12. USE OF TREE REPLACEMENT FUND 13. FEE SCHEDULE 14. ADOPTION OF LANDMARK TREES ,.. ORDINANCE NO. 168 Adopted April 12, 1988 City of Atascadero i c o r F r;�l� .elsr. r /If 'c r r r �s�• TREE ORDINANCE 9-4. 155. TREE PROTECTION: certified arborist chosen from Preservation of natural flora a list recommended by the Tree and fauna is a basic community Committee and designated by goal of the Atascadero General resolution •of the City Council Plan. as acceptable to the City of Atascadero. The arborist must (a) PURPOSE: The trees of certify that the project as Atascadero are valued proposed complies with the community assets. The purpose City' s criteria to preserve of this section is to and protect existing trees establish regulations for the from indiscriminate or installation, maintenance, unnecessary removal and preservation, and selected damage. The Community removal of native and her Development Director, in case .trees within .the City. In of disagreement with the establishing these procedures arborist' s recommendations, and standards, it is the may seek a second qualified City' s intent to encourage the arborist' s opinion (at City preservation of trees and expense) and reject or modify other natural amenities with plans as submitted. sensitive design and development practices. City (1) When Required. The .tree review of proposed projects protection plan shall be shall take into consideration required as part of the trees existing on the property materials submitted for a plot with applicants encouraged to plan, precise plan or design projects to utilize conditional use permit existing trees in the approval. landscaping pattern. The provisions of this section (2) Application Content. shall apply to all property Applications shall include all within the City of Atascadero, information specified by public or private, and to any Section 9-2. 107 (b) (Plot Plan person, firm, corporation, Content) and: public or private utility. (i) size, 'species, state of (b) TREE PROTECTION PLAN: In health, and estimated order to protect trees during dripline of each tree construction of a project and within twenty (20) feet to maximize chances for their of all development areas subsequent survival, a tree (including any areas protection plan shall be where trenching is required as part of proposed) . applications subject to this (ii) measures proposed to section. Said plans shall be ensure the survival of approved by an International remaining trees through Society of Arboriculture (ISA) the construction process -- and thereafter. ' (iii) size and species of trees proposed to replace those (iii)Landscape plans, when proposed for removal. required, must show the props(3) Tree Protection within theadriplinegof Standards. Approval of tree trees. protection plans shall require compliance with the following (iv) Performance bond may be standards: required in a form acceptable to the City (i) Tree Identification. prior to issuance of an Trees proposed for entitlement to assure removal shall be protection of trees on identified for field the site. The amount of inspection by the any set bond shall be arborist utilizing a $1,500 or the value of City-provided affected trees, whichever identification sign. is greater,rester based on Notice of Tree-Removal "Manual for Plant Permit shall be posted so Appraisers" , Council Of as to be visible from the Tree and Landscape street. Appraisers, First " Edition, 1986, a copy of (ii) Drip Line Protection. which is available for The developer is review in the Community responsible, through Development Department. final building If, in the opinion of the inspection, for the certified arborist, no preservation of all trees violation or no damage which are to remain on has occurred during the project site. construction, the bond Towards this end, the shall be returned upon following are required: final building inspection. If damage, Parking of vehicles or however, has occurred the storage of equipment and bond shall be held for materials under the three years and forfeited dripline of protected if, in the opinion of trees is prohibited the certified arborist, during construction. permanent damage has occurred. Fencing. Each tree or group of trees to be (v) Nonconformance. In case preserved shall be of nonconformance with protected by enclosure tree protection - with a five foot fence requirements, the prior to grading, Community Development movement of heavy - Director shall issue a equipment, or approval of Stop Work Order until all any plans. Location of requirements have been the fence shall be at the met. discretion of the arborist subject to City approval. 2 (vi) Unauthorized Work. Should unauthorized work (i) Trees that are identified lead to tree damage or and approved for removal destruction, the in an approved plot plan, Community Development precise plan, or Director shall issue a conditional use permit Stop Work Order until the provided that such developer has mitigated removal is subject to the damage done pursuant, removal criteria of but not limited to, Section 9-4. 155 (c) (4) ; or criteria contained in Subsection (b) (3) (iv) (ii) Trees in a hazardous Performance Bonds and condition which presents Subsection (c) (5) an immediate danger to Replacement Trees. The health or property; or matter may be appealed to the Planning Commission. (iii) Trees that are to be pruned, cut above ground, (c) TREE REMOVAL PERMIT: removed, or otherwise Tree removal means destruction disturbed affecting less or displacement of a tree by than 30% of the tree cutting, bulldozing, or other crown. mechanical or chemical means, which results in physical (iv) Trees that are to be transportation of the tree removed as part of from its site and/or death of management practices in the tree. orchards, Christmas Tree (1) When Required: For Farms, or nurseries. native trees, no person shall (3) Application Content: allow or cause the removal of Applications that a tree over twelve (12) inches propose tree removal or more in circumference or shall include all four (4) inches or more in information specified by diameter measured four (4) Section 9-2. 107 (b) (Plot feet above grade without first Plan Content) and the obtaining a tree removal following: permit unless otherwise exempted herefrom. (Refer to (i) The size, species, and Section 9-4. 155 (d) for special condition (e.g. diseased, provisions for heritage healthy, etc. ) of each trees) . Native trees shall be tree proposed for those species as defined by removal. Resolution of the City Council. (ii) The purpose for removal. For non-native trees, refer to (iii) The size and the species Subsection (c) (7) of any tree proposed to replace those intended (2) Exemptions: A tree for removal. removal permit is not required for the following: 3 (4) Tree Removal Criteria: with-out total removal of Trees proposed for removal the tree. shall be identified for field inspection by the applicant (5) Replacement Trees: utilizing a City-provided Except where, upon recommen- identification sign. Notice dation of the arborist, the of tree removal permit shall remaining tree cover is so be posted so as to be visible extensive that tree from the street. An replacement would serve no application for tree removal useful purpose, removed may be approved only when at tree (s) shall be replaced with least one of the following a similar native tree or a conditions is satisfied and number of trees which will certified by a certified provide equal aesthetic arborist and approved by the quality. The minimum size of Community Development a replacement tree shall be in Director: a fifteen (15) gallon .(i) Dead, diseased beyond container. reclamation, or (6)" Non-Native Trees. For hazardous. non-native trees 8 inches in diameter or greater, a removal (ii) Crowded, with good permit shall be obtained, but horticultural practices tree protection standards dictating thinning; shall not apply. (iii) Interfering with existing (i) Tree Identification. utilities, structures, or Trees proposed for right-of-way removal shall be improvements; provided identified by the that right-of-way applicant utilizing a improvements - especially City-provided sidewalks - shall identification sign. accommodate existing Notice of tree removal trees whenever possible. permit shall be posted so (iv) Obstructing existing or as to be visible from thestreet. proposed improvements that cannot be (d) HERITAGE TREES: Heritage reasonably designed to trees are established as a avoid the need for tree special group of trees which removal. due to age, size, visibility, or historic nature - deserve (v) Inhibiting sunlight special consideration for needed for either active preservation and protection. or passive solar heating or cooling, and the (1) Definition: building of solar collectors cannot be (i) Any native tree, as oriented to collect defined by City Council sufficient sunlight Resolution, over sixty- three (63) inches in 4 circumference or twenty (20) inches or more in diameter measured four (4) feet above grade or a multi-trunk tree with a circumference of seventy (70) inches or more. Any other tree designated by Resolution of the City Council on the basis of age, size, location, visibility or historic origin. (2) Tree Removal Criteria. A heritage tree shall not be removed except as follows: (i) The tree is approved for removal by the City Council, following public hearing. (ii) The tree has died or become a hazard as determined by a certified arborist. Any removal so authorized shall be granted a tree removal permit subject to replacement tree conditions. (e) PENALTIES: Penalties for violation of this ordinance . shall be as set forth in Chapter 3 of Title 1 of this Code. 9-4. 156. (Reserved- Street Trees) : 9-4. 157. (Reserved - Tree Management Plan) : 5 or RESOLUTION NO. 33-88 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO APPROVING A LIST OF CERTIFIED ARBORISTS AUTHORIZED TO PREPARE TREE PROTECTION PLANS IN THE CITY OF ATASCADERO (PER ORDINANCE NO. 168 , ZONE CHANGE 1-88) . WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Atascadero has appointed an ad-hoc Tree Committee to make recommendations that preserve and pro- tect trees in the City of Atascadero; and WHEREAS, the Tree Committee has made a number of recommendations towards this end including adoption of the tree protection ordinance, Ordinance No. 168; and WHEREAS, said ordinance provides in Section 9-4.155 (b) Tree Pro- tection Plans that . . tree protection plan shall be required as part of applications subject to this section. Said plans shall be approved by an International Society of Arborculture (ISA) certified arborist chosen from a list recommended by the Tree Committee and designated by resolution of the City Council as acceptable to the City of Atascadero" ; and WHEREAS, the Tree Committee has submitted such a list to the City Council for action; and WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Atascadero finds as follows: 1. The list is consistent with accomplishing the goals and poli- cies of the City' s General- Plan. 2. The list is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act. NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Atascadero does resolve to approve the attached certified arborist list dated April 12, 1988 who shall be authorized to perform certified arborist functions- as required under Section 9-4.155 of the City' s Zoning Regulations. Effective date for utilization of said guidelines shall be the effec- tive date of Ordinance No. 168 (or May 13, 1988) . On motion by COUNCILWO0IAN BORGESON and seconded by C01rNCILW21AN �1ACKEY , the motion was approved by the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS BORGESON, BOURBEAU, HANDSITY, MACKEY AND *1AYOR NORRIS NOES: NONE - ABSENT: NONE DATE ADOPTED: 4/12/88 BARBARA MORRIS, Mayor City of Atascadero, California BOYD C. SHARrTZ, City RO ASSORM: J GE N, City Attorney ;jAjROyV:D TO Gr x . MICHAEL SHELTON, ity Manager ~ PREPARED BY: HENRY NGEN Community De elopme t Director — A -2 , L Resolution No. 27-88 NATIVE TREES IN ATASCADERO Quercus lobata Nee - Valley oak Quercus a rifolia Nee - Coast live oak Quercus dou lasii H&A - Blue oak Quercus alvordiana Eastw. - Blue oak Quercus chrysolepis Liebm. - Canton live oak Quercus durata Jeps. - Leather oak Quercus dumosa Jeps. - Scrub oak Plantanus racemosa Nutt. - California sycamore Juglans hindsiiJeps. - California black walnut Arbutus menziesii Pursh. - Madrone Acer macrophyllum Pursh. - Big leaf maple Pinus sabiniana Dougl. - Digger pine Umbellularia californica Nutt. - California laurel Heteromeles arbutifolia Lindl. - Toyonlifornia bay) Populus trichocar a T&G (California holly) - Black cottonwood Populus fremontii Wats. Fremont cottonwood Salix lasiolepis Benth. California pussywillow Salix laevigata Nebb. (Arroyo willow) - Red willow 3 3 "F t w DATE 1 L6550 El Camino Real Alascadero California 93422 Ake a $ C. t Sush tCeOost"d co-chair: Mr Ray Windsor,$ City Manager, 6500' Pelma ;Avenue Atescadexo, Ca, 93422 Co-chair Dear Mr. i:ndsor:. We, members of the Dake Pavilion Committee,, are .. kiug, you to :convey to the Members of the Council .o. t r,6 you Mank Rice:.. fot s :special fund raiser. Member As 1 nevi told you in our -discussion, we,propo a to u name the two rooms and the lobby in,;the Pew l oz for, .the 'persou/pers�ons or to 'organization makii the L.W.Aiiao follp,wing donations:: Member 4251 for the large meeting room #151040 for the lobby RrA*i $10.)000 for the ,-1 000 seg. ft. meeting room�, In ,addition to being inscribed on ape anent laqu8j the ,donor',S name(s) will be a R $C*A, the respective roams., prominently diiip aged do Member If the .Council Members agree with our suggestion, �e Will make s public announcezont.'at the ,a3pPr apriate time: Thank you for your heap. Rabe�t M, m-Member nc ely, ,.,. Ssrsh Gronstrand Art mom Member • 41"i Tam F y City ofAusesAgro Advisor I REM" To CCMCIL CXTT OF.ATASCAD9r Tt y rroM* Ray^wi Ct;C, City a1 � se ting date; ' -3 Council rCciamitteex commissions, and Spa s' RKOMOMMATIM tiaff would like to- ' rIecommend,; t 'the following., �-U0,; suppleAtented by`&n ex-© ficin youth member, of hi .scliol. a +es PArks, -; Creati D• & Z,00Commiasion Traf f it",.Commit tee Recycling- Committee DL SSTON. This wculd,,Sean .,tbata this Planning. . C _ iss ott; Sui-iding Construction 'Soard of Appeals and the City, Coal , �Unot'be r*zo ended addition, althc►ugh a . meAbe r :of uu; indicated supp�art fpr a= retresentative cn. the City�Shon2,s Cam_ -'' e►ittee, thio is not recommended'. due > to the time: at. 'wl�i��, they meat,,. ' ►high we believe would, +evrely3mt rp ;eutaticc t, with respect to the method" of sel.e�ctiott, we would ito su est:,:that Re c►lu it it --No.. '5-4 .not beu�s*d ` as the 4if , 'linef since -the criteria for Recruitment "'Bli4ibility, tion do not, in :our o i,oi6t. land',,themselves ell to the target; group or encouraging, ibtereat. fir recd en�at�cut iae t&o��, Council has <determined"'thenu ►er of .committees boards and 'ctm mission;$ ,to be sented, the City Attorney be itegt 'to make .up; an appropri:atle' resolution providing baeit' criteriafor Recruiteent,' El gibility r and ,selection. XS ur -ap3ntoo wh key factors here would Sae: 1. The individual should be under. le.,: :and �► high schc�c�l student; . The',individual- must be, a resident of tcity- 3. ity;3. Aonounc to far ��, openings will, � �ble`''ahe ooi :thtough he`,> 4. , Selection will be ° made ' by utia l intervie after having Council (Preferably '.'. thro a sub c ttee , i a reduce the uulmber,of applications dowir to. throe fiO , alists t 5. All app6int*eIIn ` will, .bc Ior a 0 iod)of o r-,"e Whichc r'3�e .r ene d-' at the d soretift apl�icst .l ;a,:'3xi+ scicIti t ,i dot':, exceed + ` € e unit. RW:CO 1 At ira . nt f': U-etluticn" No1! �i.�ey��yP+�Lj �Q�ai ba Ra l�iii D44 c f A P wead "Mrf t i ^ , x. 1 5f 3: Y t s t p } f , RESOLUTION NO. 35-81 RESOLUTION ADOPTING PROCEDURES FOR THE SELECTION OF COMMITTEE, COMMISSION AND BOARD MEMBERS The Council of the City of Atascadero hereby resolves as follows: Section 1. Purpose. i The purpose of this resolution is to establish procedures for the City Council to follow in recruiting, selecting and appointing members to the standing committees, commissions or boards created pursuant to statute or by action of the City Council. Section 2. Recruitment and Eligibility. Announcements of openings for any committees, commissions or boards to which members are appointed by the City Council will be through the local news media. All electors of the City of Atascadero, over the age of 18, and meeting any announced additional criteria as established by the City Council shall be eligible to apply. Section 3. Interviews. All candidates meeting the criteria established in Section 2 will be interviewed by the City Council during a properly noticed meeting. Section 4. Selection. a. Council members will vote for the candidate (s) of their choice by placing their name and circling the name of their selection (s) on a ballot form provided by the City Clerk. Candidates ' names will be placed in alphabetical order on the ballot form. b. After the City Council has had an opportunity to make its individual determination, the City Clerk will col- lect the ballots and will announce first the Council member ' s name and second the name (s) of the candidate (s) of that Council member 's choice (s) . C. The candidate or candidates receiving -a majority of the votes of the Council members present shall be appointed. In the event that no candidate or candidates receive a majority vote or in the event of a tie vote, then a run- off ballot or ballots will be cast, following the proce- dure of sub-paragraph a. above, until a majority is � I reached. The run-off candidates will consist of all candidates receiving at least two (2) votes and if no candidates have received at least two' (2) votes, then those receiving at least one (1) vote will participate in the run-off balloting. This procedure shall be con- tinued until a majority vote is cast. 1• t Resolution No. , Commission Selection Procedures On motion by Councilman Mackey , and seconded by Councilman the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilman Highland, Makey, Nelson, Stover and Mayor Wilkins NOES: None ABSENT: None ADOPTED: November 9, 1981 ROBERT J. WIL INS, JR. , 04ayor ATTEST: ARAWARDEN, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ALLEN GRIMES, City Attorney i 2 ' MEETING AGENDA DA�6/90 rTEM# MEMORANDUM To: City Council From: Rollin W. Dexter, Mayor Via: Ray Windsor, City Manager Subject: Request for Council consideration: Youth members on City Committees Date: June 18, 1990 It has come to my attention that membership on various committees of the City Council have been limited by statute only to persons who are eligible registered voters . This means we, thus , limit the participation of persons who may be under age and yet responsible citizens of the community and willing and eager to volunteer their time. I would, therefore, request that those committees and commissions of the City which have responsibility for oversight of programs affecting the welfare of the whole community have among their members at least one youth, 16 years of age or older, who would be named as "Youth Representative" and who would serve for a term of one year at a time. Candidates for "Youth Representative" would be chosen in the same manner and requirements as set forth in Res- olution No. 35-81, with the exception of the age requirement set forth and the fact that they would be ex-officio. RD/RW:cw ,r RxpOjtT TO, CITY XL CXTY ,OF AT SCADER4' Item. Frei: Ray W9.nds vrr City Manage ea i 71 0./# l f Croa'timi: 0, the _fit 'ask Ootce f itx t Staff is resting ,thatCouncil. begin . :, h �, _ identifying ittee members for the above. Now that thy`^ new , C©uil -seetecl . = to dre# Bend n+ 'iSsu �s, 2, a1 attaching a rec uei t ;ref th* BJ'A ",,�Qr,r'the creatidr of atask force. t� begin, . mple' fat Of.jthoDotc n Master flan. fit; the conclusion of thy:, psent "tiaz by th '`,Maiter Plain, µConsultaht, the Caungil - had. indioatod -a,4*iirk..xith the jstA 'in cr at this work ng Oommititia. names and/Qr representation was_diopu °sem R .+cw - ' t , 1 attachment: BiA correspondend e. Fern$ /;.fir/2 Q f O -.Co nd i $ g y. F 1 1 i i , , t` Y t. i l 8b#` 'l. . �a, �._� ,�; w.# J. # wi .-.�� w# #r � gra .w r�.: wx„' +► ,�: #<.' #.#4 .a ar#'F'#. - _## x �,� 3F#' #t � x►*r. � ex.a a+�, ,� a +e= a;t� .;rz i'.# ;` #F .. � �s w£; #� s a�. .�y,�,. �;. �c..w-:+►,:„ w--;.� >m k.. .` F -��++ w�:.:"1r`� «.. �_.. #i: �. „9 F- )�# A} = 1h6. � � :::;$ f .'�� :b:fi�•'� may$' :$ - S � d '.Y X.�A, ' ! !+.', ,ti #V �-- # pr° #� n # :: "+k L'• a ak.:: 4 45' � +95'� Ce,wF ".K: #:- br• 4#a s,* r..t. i + :'• ... IM :...M6'i Y>' •:.i..a, .r.s;.:r ®':;: b 5B r;� ►:.- # N' i M •, qS - ..y, #� ,.b. : .Y �� R' #,:• F '9' ! _ qE Cde9 4/F ',Lw; F-',- F 1 ti -#[ ♦t � �t tM _ F� ie °:?I.' b�. -•,Ns ..'Fi !fi "'Ek siMi. #, p� �#a'.^��a -# :�Fes-• r �ix':'� itis 'a[ �:�;:':-�r aa.� ^xr .� 'c - - ti”F FFM A M 4. #w '..- ;. ��.*..,..� ,: 3 "�-,;::- <<.> t M4 �' b F... .. �.,..,A• A � 4 :• '=.',b