Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 01/10/1983 1 • AGENDA - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting October 10, 1983 7:30 p.m. Atascadero Administration Building ,Call to Order Pledge of Allegiance Invocation Roll Call Public Comment City Council Comments A. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Item A, Consent Calendar, are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion in the form listed below. There will be no separate discussion of these items. If dis- cussion is required, that item will be removed from the Consent Calen- dar and will be considered separately. Vote may be by roll call. 1. Minutes of the regular meeting of September 26, 1983 (RECOM- MEND APPROVAL) 2. Treasurer ' s Report, 9-1-83 to 9-30-83 (RECOMMEND APPROVAL) 3. Finance Director ' s Report, 9-1-83 to 9-30-83 (RECOMMEND AP- PROVAL) 4. Tentative Parcel Map AT 5-83, 2900 San Fernando Road, Mr. and Mrs. Greg Filipponi (Dennis Bethel & Associates) to allow division of 12. 6 acres of land into three parcels (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) 5. Tentative Parcel Map AT 8-83 , 9855 Laurel Road, Fred and Gail Werner (Twin Cities Engineering) to allow division of approx- imately eight acres into two parcels (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) 6. Tentative Pracel Map AT 4-83, 3000 San Fernando Road, Mr. and Mrs. Jerry Frederick, Mr. and Mrs. Donald Messer, Mr. and Mrs. Dennis Bethel (Bethel & Associates) to; allow division of approximately 16 .8 acres of landintofour parcels (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) 7. Tentative Parcel Map AT 6-83, 3100 San Fernando Road, Robert S. and Ida H. Dutra (Hohenstein) to allow division of 12. 79 acres into three parcels (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COM- MISSION RECOMMENDATION) AGENDA - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL- OCTOBER 10, 1983 8. Tentative Parcel Map AT 3-83, 3120 San Fernando Road, Bob Kelly (Twin Cities Engineering) to divide 7.90 acres into two . parcels (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMEN- DATION) ECOMMENDATION) 9. Tentative Parcel Map AT 10-83, 10725 Vista Road, Larry Cote (Twin Cities Engineering) to allow division of 9. 66 acres of land into two parcels (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMIS- SION RECOMMENDATION) 10 . Acceptance of Parcel Map AT 820401:1, 10320 Atascadero Road, Barry E. and Sandra Clarke (Morgan) (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) 11. Award Bid No. 83-08, Asphalt Concrete Overlay (RECOMMEND BID BE AWARDED TO A. J. DIANI CONSTRUCTION, CO. , IN THE AMOUNT OF $346,081. 50) 12. Caltrans Highway Projects, 1984/89 (INFORMATION ONLY; NO AC- TION REQUIRED) r;vl'i. Claim of Edward Lafferty for personal injuries, Attorney Clarkson (RECOMMEND DENIAL AND DIRECT REJECTION LETTER TO BE SENT) 14. Claim of Edward Lafferty for personal injuries, Attorney McMillan (RECOMMEND DENIAL AND DIRECT REJECTION LETTER TO BE • SENT) B. HEARINGS, APPEARANCES AND REPORTS ,J1 1. Public hearing on Ordinance No. 70, Building Regulations - !� second reading 2. Recreation Departmental Report C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1;` Resolution No. 40-83 establishing fees for permits, plan re- views and other activities undertaken pursuant to building and construction regulations D. NEW BUSINESS None E. ATASCADERO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT None F. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION 1. City Council 2. City Attorney 3. City Clerk 4. City Treasurer 5. City Manager 2 1 C � • p O ;0. £� �j 14 2 ¢ a A O X 0 I ' ll I 0 0 a 3 i 3 M'3 r I - a . .... Q -------------- ----------- --------------- ------------- r 1 I; I - �1 —. II I 0 Io o i C-1 O� 0 o w � 0 o u II Ili e e III y I a c� ,I ll � a a o T n � g 11 O O C ;O 'w X ' T 2 x ti O O N N O r N . 3Y N N T T T O N r } ATA SCADERO PAVILION BUILDING IMPROVEMENT KARL A. KEKSI �3 ATASCADERO LAKE, ATA&, CA CORPORATION A R C h I T E C T = ETiNG AC"aE�lt�A TE to a g IT�m • MINUTES - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL N5 Regular Meeting Sebtember 26, 1983 1 Atascadero Administration Building The meeting was called to order at 7 : 30 p.m. with the Pledge of Allegiance. Monty Lant of the First Baptist Church gave the invocation. ROLL CALL Present: Councilmen Molina, Nelson, Stover, ylilkins and Mayor Mackey Absent: None STAFF Present: Murray Warden, City Manager; Ralph Dowell, Finance Director; Allen Grimes, City Attorney; Patsy Hester, Deputy City Clerk; Mike Hicks, Fire Chief; Skip Joannes, Recreation Director; Bud McHale, Police Chief; Larry McPherson, Public Works Director; Barbara Norris, City Clerk; and Larry Stevens, Planning Director. • PUBLIC COMMENTS 1. Gary Larson of the Chamber of Commerce stated that he had received a telephone call from the Area Coordinator of the Olympic Torch Run. He requested assistance from the city in clearing the route down El Camino Real. The torch bearer will come through Atascadero in July of 1984 . 2. Bruno Adamoli thanked Public Works for their work in repair- ing roads. COUNCIL COMMENTS None A. CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Minutes of the regular meeting of September 12, 1983 . (RECOM- MEND APPROVAL) 2. Resolution No. 43-83 approving acceptance Sof Federal Land and Water Grant funds for South Atascadero Park (RECOMMEND ADOP- TION) MINUTES - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL - SEPTEMBER 26, 1983 3. Tentative Tract Map AT 2-83, 10510 San Marcos Road, John White (Twin Cities Engineering) to divide 9. 93 acres into three parcels employing the minimum lot size reduction (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) 4. Tentative Tract Map AT 7-83, 9290 El Bordo Avenue, Wallace E. Dunn (McCarthy & Associates/Associated Professions) to create a 10 unit condominium project (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) 5. Tentative Tract Map AT 1-83, 10800 San Marcos Road, Jennie Lee (Twin Cities Engineering) to allow resubdivision of a previously created parcel containing 15.14 acres of land into four parcels employing the minimum lot size reduction adjustment (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION REC- OMMENDATION) 6. Certificate of Compliance CC 2-83, 6720 Los Gatos Road, Connie Latham, for legalization of a lot split that occurred in 1977 (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMEN- DATION) 7. Certificate of Compliance CC 3-83, 6698 Los Gatos Road, Marie Washabaugh, for legalization of a lot split that • occurred in 1977 (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) 8. Acceptance of Lot Line Adjustment LA 830517 :1, 10210 Atas- cadero Avenue, George and Christine French (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) Mayor Mackey reviewed all items on the Consent Calendar. MOTION: Councilman Molina moved to approve the Consent Calendar. The motion was seconded by Councilman Nelson and unanimously carried by roll call vote. B. HEARINGS, APPEARANCES AND REPORTS 1. City Attorney Report No. 25 Mr. Grimes reviewed items in the report. He recommended that the City join as amicus curiae in the case of Kershaw vs. City of Berkeley but recommended not to consider joining in the case of Yost vs. Thomas. Council agreed to join as amicus curiae only in the case of Kershaw vs. City of Berkeley. • -2- MINUTES - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL - SEPTEMBER 26, 1983 Mr. Grimes stated that he will be going on vacation and will not be attending the next Council meeting. C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Resolution No. 41-83 adopting Budget for Fiscal Year 1983-84 Mr. Warden stated that the budget has been adjusted to include the previous removal of. State subvention funds and that the cost of annotating the legal codes has been updated. He recommended that the $9, 000 for the economic study be reconsidered and included in the budget. MOTION: Councilman Molina moved to delete $25, 000 from the account of Parking Lot Improvement. The motion was seconded by Councilman Nelson and carried on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Molina, Nelson and Mayor Mackey' NOES: Councilmen Stover and Wilkins MOTION: Councilman Molina moved to take out $35, 000 from the accounts of Lake/Park Lighting Improvement, Renovate Parking Area, and Demolish House End of AARP Building. The motion was seconded by Councilman Nelson and carried on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Molina, Nelson and Mayor Mackey NOES: Councilmen Stover and Wilkins MOTION: Councilman Nelson moved to set aside an additional $200, 000 for the police facility building fund. The motion was seconded by Councilman Molina and defeated on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Molina and Nelson NOES: Councilmen Stover, Wilkins and Mayor Mackey Mayor Mackey noted that she wanted to change her vote on the Previous motion which carried on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Molina, Nelson and Mackey NOES: Councilmen Stover and Wilkins -3- MINUTES - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL - SEPTEMBER 26, 1983 • MOTION: Councilman Molina moved to delete $15, 000 out of the budget for the Five Ton Roller. The motion died due to lack of a second. MOTION: Councilman Nelson moved to delete the Police Officer and Community Service Aide from the budget. The motion was seconded by Councilman Molina and defeated on the following- roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Molina and Nelson NOES: Councilmen Stover, Wilkins and Mayor Mackey MOTION: Councilman Wilkins moved to adopt the balance of the budget for Fiscal Year 1983-84 . The motion was seconded by Council- man Stover and carried on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Stover, Wilkins and Mayor Mackey NOES: Councilmen Molina and Nelson Councilman Nelson reconsidered his vote on the above motion and voted yes. MOTION: Councilman Wilkins moved to include the $9 ,000 for the economic study and an additional $200 for the legal code updates. The motion was seconded by Councilman Stover and carried on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Nelson, Stover, Wilkins and Mayor Mackey NOES: Councilman Molina RECESS 8 : 40 p.m. RECONVENE 8 : 47 p.m. MOTION: Councilman Wilkins moved to adopt Resolution No. 41-83. The motion was seconded by Councilman Stover and carried on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Nelson, Stover, Wilkins and Mayor Mackey NOES: Councilman Molina 2. Resolution No. 42-83 adopting a salary/classification classification for the 1983-84 Fiscal Year -4- MINUTES - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL - SEPTEMBER 26, 1983 Mr. Warden stated that this resolution formalizes agreements of the MOUs and implements a salary plan for FY 1983-84 . MOTION: Councilman Wilkins moved to adopt Resolution No. 42-83 . The motion was seconded by Councilman Stover and unanimously carried by roll call vote. 3. Policy statement regarding the General Plan Larry Stevens presented a draft policy statement concerning industrial and commercial development. MOTION: Councilman Nelson moved to adopt the policy statement as prepared by the committee and refer it to the Planning Commission for their review and response for implementation in the General Plan. The motion was seconded by Councilman Molina and carried on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Molina, Nelson and Mayor Mackey' NOES: Councilmen Stover and Wilkins D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Consideration of Elliott Stephenson's report regarding seismic concerns for the Administration Building to include considera- tion of developing options for alternative facilities Larry McPherson reviewed Elliott Stephenson' s report on the seismic safety condition, identifying problems and stress in the Administration Building. Mr. Warden stated that large gatherings have been canceled in the Rotunda Room and recommended limiting vigorous'; activities. He recommended hiring a firm to provide definitive recommendations as to what could be done, if anything, and estimates of cost to correct any deficiencies. He also recommended retaining a' firm to analyze potential sites, space requirements, cost factors, financing options, and statutory aspects on public financing to provide an overall guide for a separate police facility or perhaps a combined general administrative, police, and fire substation facility. His recom- mendation was to get enough information upon which'; to make an informed decision concerning city administrative facilities . MOTION: Councilman Wilkins moved to support staff ' s recommendation on the use of the Rotunda Room. The motion was seconded by Councilman Molina and unanimously carried. ' -5- MINUTES - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL - SEPTEMBER 26, 1983 MOTION: Councilman Nelson moved to authorize proposals for a firm to analyze the problem of total city facilities. The motion was seconded .by Councilman Molina and unanimously carried. 2. Ordinance No. 70 adopting the 1982 Uniform Codes (Building Regulations) - introduction, set hearing date for October 10, 1983 Larry Stevens commented that Ordinance No. 70 proposes adoption of the 1982 Uniform Codes to replace Title 19 of the County Code which was adopted by the City in 1979. He stated that the proposed ordinance adopts the Uniform Codes by reference and he summarized the minor changes. He recommended that public hearing be set for October 10, 1983. Council requested Mr. Stevens to receive comments from the Board of Appeals members. �I j MOTION: Councilman Wilkins moved to real Ordinance No. 70 by title only. The motion was seconded by Councilman Stover and unanimously carried. i Mayor Mackey read Ordinance No. 70 by title only. MOTION: Councilman Wilkins moved that this constitute the first reading of Ordinance No. 70 and that public hearing be set for October 10, 1983. The motion was seconded by Council- - man Nelson and unanimously carried. 3. Resolution No. 40-83 adopting fee schedule for permits, plan review and associated activities MOTION: Councilman Nelson moved to postpone adoption of Resolution No. 40-83 until public hearings are concluded. The motion was seconded by Councilman Molina and unanimously carried. 4 . Consideration of San Luis Obispo County Mayors and Council- members resolution urging the League of California Cities to develop and sponsor a California Constitutional Initiative restoring a guaranteeing local control of .all final land use, subdivision, and annexation approvals for privately owned property Mr. Warden stated that the City of San Luis Obispo is requesting support of a resolution to be sent to the League of California Cities. -6- MINUTES - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 26 , 1983 MOTION: Councilman Nelson moved to support the resolution of the mayors and councilmembers of all cities in 'San Luis Obispo County urging the League of California Cities to develop and sponsor a California Constitutional Initiative restor- ing and guaranteeing local control of all final land use, subdivision, and annexation approvals for privately owned property. The motion was seconded by Councilman Stover and carried with Councilman Molina voting no. E. ATASCADERO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT None F. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/0R ACTION 1. City Council Nothing. 2 . City Attorney Nothing. 3. City Clerk Nothing. 4 . City Treasurer Nothing. 5 . City Manager Nothing. The meeting adjourned at 9 :45 p.m. BARBARA NORRIS, City Clerk By: Patsy A. Hester Deputy City Clerk -7- , • CITY OF ATASCACERO TREASURER'S REPORT SEPTEMBER 1, 1983 TO SEPTEMBER 30 , 1983 RECEIPTS TAXES Property Tax 4,506 .24 Cigarette Tax 3,561. 02 Motor Vehicle "In Lieu" 36 ,960 .00 Sales & Use 121,047. 65 Business Inventory Tax 2,828 . 20 Miscellaneous Taxes 217 . 55 LICENSES/PERMITS/FEES 13 ,141. 34 GAS TAX 35,625.02 TRAFFIC SAFETY 3,891. 06 RECREATION FEES 18,976.25 RETURNED FROM LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND AND MATURED TIME DEPOSITS 265 ,000. 00 • INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS 1, 323.96 TRANSPORTATION SB-325 -0- REVENUE SHARING -0- GRANTS -0- MISCELLANEOUS Rents/Concessions 38. 64 Rebates 224. 56 Sale Maps/Publications/Reports 692. 00 Special Police Services 57.00 Fines & Penalties 955.10 Dial-A-Ride Farebox 1,871. 00 Bails/Bonds 485.00 Reimbursement to Expense 857 .46 P.O.S.T. Reimbursement 4,967.95 Zoological Society Donation 25,000 . 00 Wil-Mar Refuse Contract 2, 019. 58 911 Funds 5 ,966.00 Miscellaneous 5,284. 73 TOTAL $ 555,497 .31 • 1 CITY OF ATASCADERO i TREASURER'S REPORT SEPTEMBER 1, 1983 TO SEPTEMBER 30 , 1983 INVESTMENTS LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND 1,215,000. 00 TIME DEPOSIT, SANTA BARBARA SAVINGS 10 .375° INTEREST, MATURES 12/20/83 100,000.00 TIME DEPOSIT, CITICORP SAVINGS 10.00% INTEREST, MATURES 01/23/84 100 ,000. 00 TOTAL INVESTMENT DEPOSITS 1, 415,000. 00 • Steven M. Ri'50o, Treasurer 2 i 'A;^ M-77: • CITY OF ATASCADERO FINANCE DIRECTOR'S REPORT SEPTEMBER 1, 1983 TO SEPTEMBER 30 , 1983 BALANCE AS OF AUGUST 31, 1983 9 ,981.73 DEPOSITED BY TREASURER, SEE RECEIPTS, TREASURER'S REPORT, PAGE 1 555,497 .31 TOTAL 565,479. 04 HAND CHECK REGISTER DATED 09/29/83 372,484.51 CHECK REGISTER DATED 09/14/83 50 ,936.08 CHECK REGISTER DATED 09/26/83 31,973.89 CHECK REGISTER DATED 09/27/83 4,463. 07 EXPENSE LISTING 101,877.38 TOTAL 561,734.93 BALANCE AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1983 3,744.11 PETTY CASH 200.00 TREASURY INVESTMENTS • SEE TREASURER REPORT, PAGE 2 1, 415,000.00 TOTAL $1,418 ,944 .11 I,RALPH H. DOWELL JR. , do hereby certify and declare that demands enumerated and referred to in the foregoing register are accurate and just claims against the City and that there are funds available for payment thereof in the City Treasury. Dated: October 4, 1983 Ralph H. Dowell, Jr. Finance Director Mu ray Warden • City Manager 3 l l l i a a a a k t bac a.^_. a cc co j ac+a cc c aoo c ac ... ,...-- c ^ - -- z D N\ V\\ \i V\ \\ I 7 - .. C, µ i C • }\.v V v v v V V v V v V V V V V V V V v v V V V V V v V V V v'u t, C'0 r^;,G i; 'o w;, i r. - W s� s LR l Cs CRN NN 1 0 ASA AAA -A, 4. WW W WW r' GtW W'0W G O.0 0 v0,0 vo ACCO f fT:c A Gi i,,w o MN C` N A W IN v:C V or,Ii- A W rJ rs w V C`C-A W N .G j OC CD o CCOGC ^ COOOCGOCOCOtZ�i7 I � ; 71i i-7^CCC,+`7GCOCCGC 000 I �•-! t � V � E � � 7 1 z o cio c o o 'co Q u Q'c _ ! 7O a0 a .+'pO QO a'r.+.+ 0 O CO a 0'C a a aQ a O++a COO+-+QOCO C a0,•+ I �O j �CcaA ' M� rJ C- rN .,r C-N) iJ-il� - N W V R r,D 'J *;V CrJ ` ..�C`A �v"J Q'v:c o :^ '71 ri. 1 a^c,i- a a-+V -�I..�w -0 A lC c" 1a,ti A 10 vZ A•+"= M':i 3 1 M G V:W a>+.w -il 41, -J ^a ^ L4 1-0 a, A p..' J ^ c V C'v W"^Y•0^ N J G N ! ' 1 I r i{ -£D 0 7 7 I-i ,j'-{ Z .,..£ N z .! r D D D D b Z�..3- ' { t€�M ` ..7 i :.� {1-3 Z 0 Z iM, „"€ri '-€ T€ .� '.Ti i {M m v7 L,- ..� ,. a^. I _ D-'i z 7- s �'VZ•1 ',C i J L•Z:', i cn -I 1 €'-1 ')" D D J -'1 '-j T.�-+. - v D D M 'tv D n.Z W Z _,. -.> D O?1- E5 m Z> !v M.M.-} S_. D-•€^ ,Z y £ Z Z -^ m D s '�x tt�i :� 'T? T z-i �-. -n r.,.- rrt-*; >C T x m i t D r1lr-i s u 1 C D- W . i O L C rs. .c. „�:--! .i w O D Z O*-f j € .-31 "-i v D r;D -S a n z i �" ?-" '_ D 3 T-D ti D A i I o ^:"C-4 m" z m z *-5 3 C -t D D D.-Fc -i , D 7 7""f D vz_ _ '::C-, z M ,z—t ! i ^ Z C Z - uZ Z ti ID :a -I ,-�, _D -c-i.T,-7a )-�,CI j^Z ^OE Zz j-` i { .D,., € ti { T..0 DGCGrt-€I; z C "k7 E 17�c 11 (C m r I.M.; s Z -r"D C { 7 7a,^'i z C. .--s s ., IrS" ZD Ga ',--t..� D z , ZDD ' GI z ^ G I , ^ Z 4: V.. S r • I ! 1 CDzz tt z I t ^z l i I ' I z 1 .+..- o! ,- .+,a+.C al a""o opo o Y a o c - c o c o a Q I Z G- z ri _ _ r o - i v V; V vZ`L`0 W C `c',`C `u O`il `Li \\ \\ \ \\ \\\ \\\ \\\ \\ \ \\\ \\ \ \\ \ \\ \\\\\\\\\ \ \\\ € V, J C O- ',� '..,.•=:.+ '- :-+•'�. a, iR' CR ,II't, C moi,tet, '0't, 4', 'C vZ'0 -4� v-C V v V V V V v V V V C` ..J N 1 --4 C W W :>. s€W W f,.a.i W W CA W e„} W W W W Ex.a: W W w W W W;,f W vi w E,i E,:f,1''tZ u:iai-W fA W W w'w .,. i ri ^ C O a 0 C O O O C Q a C O a Q a a C 0 0 W`0, t;,W`- `v D Qaoco acQac oaaacc aaa a vZvvZ�• % uv, c --? 0 0 o Q Q Q c o a «..., ..,, W ;�.,. W �,+ a oa a!^Q c c.ro a c c oQao ac ^a Q i - ! [ - ^_ ! t u ^ C C O a 0 C O O C C a G C 1 M -i rn �..O '.. r. '. .� O Q O O •r^_ O O O O C C C O Q C C ^ ! T{ m tvo,r L? 1=CR*-' o o a Q oc �a Qa s ! D O ! -? € i I I _ ? € t 7• .t € t7 " 'rJ rJ r.r rJ ! rJ rJ,, ,€ j►�.+ .+r+ Sh ru N J rJ'J ^i:r�sFJ 'J rJ tTJ!'J t� TJ r r rµrJ ril ':i^YLy'rJ r rJ:"J r J ril ril s J }+ rcs V J Q J V'..„3 a+ • A A A .:: a Q Q a a a a a a a a s a .1\'• J 1^ 'T ^�" >+.� ? A o A A c 10 v'W a a µa a a Q a.o c o a c Q c o t o Qa c a .::A•.'il W�.A o a .-Q,.. € € W I • i s c c Q c c o c c _ Q _ o •:;c c c a o o i � •C 'a c oQca c V W cooQoc o0 oQ `. f ., \ ^ ^^ oaaco oCR c�!!o cc oo ^^ Q as aaaac Vca c ^ a ^ a a € r W _ _ I ! ^ _^'•`-; L7T•-.x• ',77 sr? t �I \ _ i-,€ � ?,'{ } ,} '} X �}.�} X ; oc cc oc � -- cca c ac c aa ^ o o cQ c Qo Lrl Q Q a o o a Q c Q,✓ a c o c Q o a c a c Q a a c c o a a a a o aaa '� { r 'CRv? iv A " tio •cZµLR,., JV V cvZw AvZ W ^C -, v wcvv., . : c W oo .+ .'•W .'• ^^ �v:^ }'• WA JW A ,C,V CA �. - _:_. .rJr ':3 ',oc *' co:'J •- 'J 'J LR i,c Vv^, �+• v ' ^V Qo- AClaoa oQ Ll 'C "aacQQa oaaCo .=ac :;c x >,c x X D ? GZ i tan t... _r :. G G cs. 6r ` fim L. 6w �- \ t l i' l ♦ \ ♦ \ • t •. 1. • t - � I I I : CA i �'i W �0 \;V V V V Ij\v" "` 0`C- 01 CII w 4 t.- w N t-''c ,o w'V � L.,A is ± ? � o 1 I O O O u 0 C. ::-; O O'i� 0 I '-i I I 'z z ON vC a.0•u ^ci '-- I 't my C D 71 O'z ^ I :i 1'i I I 71 2:1 M M z z GD.J k f D D -3� Dz D D i z' z .- - z F Ml z 0 z :,� '_ - •0 O _ :� t: V:: �:•i;� v v;•0•0•i:�::�-c', ti. w vi •i: _ -I } ' ^J'J D F O m m M. - v< W 'vt n .e. .+<Erl C:t x E.i:.+:ir±w .aI•`st irE cx • _ _ _ OG a W a I - p1 I o c o rJ D D 0 D o co oc - - cc coUO C'! c Cit !7 0 o c c \ z t' _. t''J I 07 M 71.1 71 �� .� coo V � � •0 _ X x x x x X X x x X x x x x X x X^X X X X X X ^x ! -"1 a _ LA c c t i i c o »� J'vi - J ' D - CII CO N v Co^ a - -. a \ % { D t i IL t l t l t t. t t l t t t t I j 12 "' 9 t4 L'l i F z z F � i ! { f ! m rM I E T � I r I • I , � I I> 7> i j i i r I j I i z G7 Z i I m T t ED I t — :> { I I ! C ! ' i'•'! v 1 C� 0 i z ! cam t a o a ttv i a ! t i _„i i E.x i V CJ \ co \ _ f l w Ci i z x i -im 6w ! I i , i D j i -M 17, C7 M 77 Z 3c IX -Z f- f 4 )IZ D r r I j £ ^ (! J �_ 11 r it I C•S"' i:4 ICZ- ';7'^ M !C) It') •4I-o'{s �T. CS'O -C�'L'-6-:'.I-ia v�i/7 c;Imo. t7- ;'i jT+ i !- I '..?7 a'N T -� I-i :'v -i A r _!" ~so ,, -!^ -i -+ J i ?t Z p � :> :T� _ A J ) '�. a >a J J :-A A.A•A A A'A> .a r,! to Q o j a O Q •�� io a C. O ^O �.o --f:> C:M {moi 1J^J .1) rV `N.:) ra J rJ N r+J a ••�� J J \ A-b -,;A A 'w w .4 w C4 ..i IJ o r J is = I • V\ r '. I NfJ^ N . %, �. o If t ' [ ,v X X X j X x X x X X X X X KIK X Y. X I `3 10 .O i C inCD / ' I J"3 tz� Ir o o fJ oo i i .. a .-: ! i v ! -p..,-=: •�;- ;iia C o 0 0 tv _ ^ 71 1 i I -1 I j 6-2 L I' I ! U h A I i _ µ y I I i I I I I7 I i !ir ` an An o an - An as as - w In - it - r it w i. `. Aw 4. G ra 1 rr Lr i rt - :r i z! -C rn on fn •1 ,,�I ' r i I 7 j I - I 1 t Ii F ' t i f z { z t 1 ' -� n-• cz, cz � n � r� c:I n _ n-^ - T, n = �-� � T I rei 'i i i • - _ 1: T - ..1^ _ `n' iT: [ - i Mi i i 7"1 F s•-e VI ^ -i C -'t v -+Ic H m --i ,..4 1, J t i C.i --4 01 _..+ .:a J -i f 71 C7 tv L. J J i .? :Ti '3 a1 vl 1 ' I it 1 ` r` � I I i _ -i• I Z „, '3 C C I _.. O�' O C O 7 C I a O 1 1 I -•f� tr cN!Iz -4 -A C.4 CJ Q X`C-. XX. X: XX X X X X X ! X X X X t -J n 3 ..: ,. •-* -1 :+,... 1 j C.4Z. I y M• ' .3 X r n I _. n r LJ I t Z ci -! Li C _ .L' .L• I7UA: I x3 I ✓ �1 �` i� I I I � I �. � � f? I 1 j I j I ! 1 I I '• ! i I '' D cD _'-r,: Cr:4 00 0 40 to e c e c c c z ' v s • �i v v v • v v v v v • 9 2 _ z Iz Lr ? sIc. z \ v Iz ' Lr e_ 1 r_ ( Pl t ! If ! 'm_ I : G _ - IC FI -C A L7 �Iw-0.+ fil J ! w I w r ! O J7 R j i J .? > I J J ^�4t^•�^ A p o 0 0 .� � I- m :- T -'c71 ,-1 m-m- -'fism-^, m � - f :X:C X X X X X _ X X X>C X X X X X X`G X X X X iCD -i CP co rn I Z3 Z- c G '.i I I I N 3'. J ...! ! I 00 0 J .� ! 'J . it i f� ® ® A I A -- ' - -.- --. _a . a 77ter' Ic 77 7.1 17 '�• I � ' II -- I I i i i i F n j J F ! J 'J M1 ti j r r ;- •^M 5Z 17 14� V7 i .^ �± ±• It ± t t7- 17 7 vi I l -C C � O I C I C .�a - - f 1 �••� ��± 3'd -ao caC-oao .. r.j J -J J , tAAJJ.c - \It?V VvV Via J _ o - w a ij ril ±1 X <X XXX"i x XXXXXXX X X `C"! X ` -•' ,i 7 z _ l Ar.: I�eJ\ i�iez 7C�T.'7 1 z - 'R r w w.4i.�..� r•e 'Z i 3 D'�_ �t— —+ n •rr'c - O O �.: � ;C D�I i I - �.. 7J Z cG �- ± j i�u-,tof%- I71 Z7-z i i77 T 77J `;....0.A V V ^moi rJ i 1_ 10 M \ � \ i _ w j I J _ le bl Zz ti \ IzI fX i E I t i I I f i 'v t i t7 i l i Ii 77r — - -• __ J -\ _t -t I1 _� A .mss . Ja � = CR . ry 4,4 77 M. i � Srinr+. -;r-T-m } _. _X`< -`C K X X -`< XXX K Xj�X>CXY `< 4 .i 1 I , i I i- 11 :1 CD �^ a -� UI I \ I I r - zz z= 17 i _ Zj 7Z T Z77 i � L TT CA j I �, • • ' v • . • . • • • v v v s t L cz zc CO: - r .a ;A '03 t { „r , lc z cr I > - ! iz iz CC i z — h ato 1 j i r z i r` a ICi ^ rI ` f j G C,-0 n' _ -- -o - ._ -o: Zi V: -+nJ. -i. '1 -i.:.i -1`J -i \ \ iiirn .7) - - j O o o'. a V o 0 0= o r7 IC a 1 0 o c o0 0 .. I ��r �Y:.+ ,Y L.t .Til W N, 70 7z 714'J Til — ° ! CD �.." '� o o !c c o 0 o a r c a a o �• 41 XX X; X- X ,X X X r- I XX' X X• XX XX •ij^ 'i ` o r, O O 'f? -.O ? - TO �0` 70 _ A �+; 7. ...:� ?il TJ a > T+! t o V tW . j fA 9) Ln� n iG i-i jJ :tee m i'1= - ?'1_'f, Z z t ;--t :.i 70 III z z 1 m T to 177 co IQ C3 -.. a i .^'•\ w _ .� ."Ii ^' iiVLA . :.i :.i J! �? a. ?A J c_. o o ?r:LR =c 'T^ J v' �;:.t J ?' ...a -0 LR A m TT"J ' • ! I i i� I i ! 'T i I I Z'7 D D c YJ w a. LJ i V 77M, r%j T 7j 77 D ' O v! { i tai S ] � a �•? > I � I I � i � I I � C i N, - z R I f I j c I I t T ' n a n'� n 0 M-., n n- n n- n n n Cl r n + S G _T_-^ i_^. S,G G: —G' _ �� -'� G! G G S G Y 1 = r.� ! M Com' -a '.-.! _I ...I'+ ?+S -i -+. ,.t-: -i"' •."!zJ -t _ -i i --I M !.F ma - L US t.,4 !.i i � -••t"3 T. C :� j tR L'3 O C ^ O C O O M.M O C 1 itj CD CD fQ.. re Cu Y: ti j 1 'J .+I iPJ rr r= fir+N N JI n \ J _ _ a, •a oc !c o c! o c o ! m Y i v o c is a c o I o Cs : ' X" X X XXX G' `C K. X `G� Xi XX X XX �C. -iz o c C c c o 0 j I ^ FC7 m S 1 co .A I Cz' 4�-i ;� a,n. .ri I (b a�.r'! „.'•I ^ to I ^ j 1 X X '� :V '�7i -n X j -F 73 X X T_ { CCE Y -q 7 ! t (n i iLrt rr =a .J +L' awn. ! 0 .S r J J c ti L o _ o .� - L;. �]y. _ a c .n. rJ rJ v .••� -:V i < M ;r u t [ i w • • • • Y J �` to a I = I C = z t o ' { - tA 71 j i z z } N z ?G , 7r; 3 I I� z 1 ' t -e c� ! -a "O"a-c-^-0 '-J 0 in i rn o h o a^ 1 ,..: -n ....}i IV 7 J rn ':O i S4 I n. .� :� w ^ >1. '+• :? .OV.> T^ i ooc"� ..a r- - `a-- 1 n ZI cm, tr i 7_ -VN G 4--,=o ? I i i I 1 I ! litt i i '•t i 1 ;1 j 1 i i } I i -t j 1 j > v :7 i Jr �'N'�J 3rJ-_ m f)a i J - v!`t"J t J v rJN :,PJ 7'--' 'Si r•ro N rJ NrJ.^J Nt, 7j 70 70 J rJ rJ%;•J f J 7jJ rJ rJ••ra pi N rJ rJ r`:J 1 il j t'J"J'J t'J N fJ fJ rJ—-+ *+.� C)� +-• D _ J Nru r::NrJ rJ •J ! NN JrJ JN^J!•J rJ+v N N N rJ N:_ rJ iv rJ N rJ N r•J NoaaV c a e a c a a o CD C3 c c a c a o^o c o o c _ O a C O:^O C a C'C o p o Q o O Q O C,a O a C a C O C O o t 771 It - 'O o a a C o Q C o o a 0^.a 0 0 a 0 O•�O o O O^_O a^.O C C C Q e 0 C } �' o0 e.0000C Oao^ CoaoQ C'a O .".�_00 7C C'3a C'CaO- i v - i ^ o Iss r*i-m: n M-t'-tl m, rn- m r' 71! -1 M. =m-m-^m m . z - X XXX.XXXXX XXXXX:CXXXX X.XXX`t`G XX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X I of j a c o 0 o o CD Q a-o 0 0�o c=o 0 0 0 c c c o 0 o c o0 00 - 0 000 cc tccco00c000co _ c _ i a op^ooam: ao,po cacoQaaooec oQooccc00000^ tea - I .y, I tJ ti u7'L•i r„t w W W W.at;4 WW W vi C4 ` ! W t.;w .at r ry W tv W W 4i iai it W J rJ 1 I IZ !a CO V V V V V:V\ - CO MO rA O O3O,A-M K1 C' O co co 9^..o 37 V V V � V t. , 7_ � f �•0.�0� j •o �O•C J rJ ':J v^J-:J ra, 1 *J"N J ''.P\:V V J tY.,Z. - t G ' ! tJ N rJu I 0`� IT J.._rJ Zl rJ AI 'J'.J 3 r! f I W M O '"+.."_'+^".'U A,.F 'h a-a n I_ 7 i A>_A Z>t-a. ti .-0 l0',: o .O,.0 V V A -1 h a 00 ,�"!-i�-!-,-i :.7��D•���;.� 'r= j D>D'D D:>M.> D D D R D.D D DDD»9-D D D D D D D D DD O C -s-!-i'--!C0C7tvOty -W t: 7 w 4 c-A w W x!_ -TicD zO i z ' 17 U) ' V)Cr). _ I ui.u9 CR U,to rn cl n �. x c!c-z w w ew x 1-}v it,x r 7--: i c 1--!:- i -n pr m.TI\:\\\\\\\\ \\\ l- ?-:�t. H H H t I v 0:'• 7C- ' ti -+ 'st-):7Inz 7zz ! zz;,z z-0 -37:3 -civm --"r-+s, z A c C'c G G G.e G.-, -m- -'?t 7v Irl I 0 0 In 0 z z t:m C) 7-1 -n tv ? \ DD>'Dm-mZ -t-1-1,T,7.zzZzZZzD>a> t:7ciGl.G77:77.uI r•'! ? '?l j -r- ` t--r,r- ••u.7-u) ui:Z fU;_.0 JlN _ i j 11 ! j I I > iG ` .G 1 D• jc Q_J ..'J*" _' ^ V:':V v i•10_^r^:a:'_ -•>L.Icra .iV -•-.. a : z i. I !=� :F> a>Q r _ r,w v.AJOa"..i J =V. _ \ R -'JC �:�0 J^•O� .'"� ;r LJA i 'slrIt y'+- _ � I:V n....'J ,,aiQ V ! v ! p i 3— -� 1 f I I i —� G 71 [ 1 i 1 f I toIm "{ ll . — 1 E 1 = i 1 i II 1{ j I i i t G ( i i om i F co i73 I, i I j 1 O i tZ � tA ! W 1 co i I of I - -- I 15 � i a - � - o .. � • • . r. . . s a t t r s r � I _ I 1 t zI C. D' D N f t+ N I f.+ ;w I.. 7 L,S all �IM p co !CO I O b 12 O I O O `x O I u !O I A: 10; •, m. { a c Ic o a c c c a Ic r+ ^' CR C^ A I? ? A '? ? A I c �.? I A j t,J 1 'rl x :?. CR �A IW fJ I,-+ o !V C., jV T iLR IA IW �rJ ,r'. �a iV 1 ;0 ( Y C r 3I -- 11 n z c Cl I c c I c V i L? ! `v ! c 0 E3 0 .+ o i • 0 Ci o f t W Mr.0 fil 0 G` i to {;: f7 i": iT. '; `-# r i'z+ �D D ID 'X 1 C; I f �D IS D it Ir D I :O r I� x �E7' !D ID iD Iz 1 Z z 'D I-i IH H :3c C O r l a3 to C) If7 rn Tl I'�l 'r - i"c `rys I-[ :'.S Im 0 ill D 1 C. I O �0 !C 43 �L[S j 9 D iD Iz i T C, O `..mac i.. _i i x ,. t G'T W, D 1 tv !C3 ty I f z :--i 1 7J D. 'r IT! C j T !.1'i I f"i iTi t z' i .L` IS IH H t�! 1C z u'3 r -t :i: ;.fit 'A I;o 1 D- �C t0 D ?D 9 i3 i I'i �r. O. IC !O O IO i X Z O r i'0 t_ ,D It*i ,G Iz i D cs 1-+ D o I z I 'c i {'t ED : c- {z Z i-1 I - 'S{ Iz ! 'z D C z T £ o ! 'C-) E k 1 ! z I C- -o (- � (1 1 O SI O S.'< S:O S. r'! .7 M! , - , 7 .;=i �!O S.,O Si0 S,G I .z.,'� �. t-a 771 j f'7c ^a tTo ^o -C;'c ^a fi.o pro t;'.a ;?.a ;;.o ,o ro C, ^:o i. cr-1 ' ,-Go no c,-.a T.c n'.o T,;c �a T.i.o �a c -a Ta -c iia �,o !LR C'" i. ,^ ICR 'hi - i.;CR ,? -i ti -i G -4.-C-C -1 V -F r%) --I O -?'.C -±:w -1 .-!:C -ii^ �'-3 -1''V j V .-1;.0 .-1 rm z ;01 -f - 001 Oo. O!C,. OLR 0 l 0 O.A OC Cc CV 0 l O-W O,c Oc O._R O:V i i 7 - 1 -410 -+ A -I.CR -1 r J -i;:^J -1? -r.A -i W --f..A -1 w -;.CJ -4.•+ --i: -1 w c 1 i m (-I _ D D D DD; 1 V � 1-1"l i ty!A _ iy :W - W jW 'IWo . ifJ :o Ifa, �W1tr. ,A ? ? W kW L7G ti0 D a L LR c o c a LlL .• tR 1 zC,'u" ` !--i D 1 a o Ic a c a ,o c � ;o to c c !o la •-' a o o a c to la a c a io la c o c t G n i77 to a o c c �o a a �c to a o la c o c i E o! i j l I^I i ! i j i i I I + i i 1 1 i 1 ,I i D wl n 111 -.IN rJ ,I,J ifJ ;rJ i>+ ,rJ °�-+ irJ J !CJ ifJ �W 'ril i�J !.fJ t Ji \: iril irJ !ril '.+ ! J J .rJ ! Cv, fJ; :W a j? rJ iN i► iA ... jo ? i.> 'CR C CO iL, Io •o '.W 'W 1 W! M 1111 !W '!a Ic c i? 'a ':.� j►• c !a o V » 1 i { It i ' t ! t �t II .I 'I !! i �� O ,.Irk ';R m m fr7 '77a Irn '.� I'*1 f^ i1 'i1 �1 in n'i M ' .Mc,z X X IX 1X iX IC ,X C IX. jX X X X 'X IX ,X 1 -d jo a Io a I,o c Io c Ic is o c o o c o ! Io a io la Ia +0 10 0 'a io M. iz i0, in I �6` IV r ;rr In {1 iZICR 'DO i z I it w IiJ i3 '3 I� !G7 '"rt ICR 'Z f Zn iµA i? .71 !z ;z 1 C'. I LR !o IH -ti 7 O. 'D I t'l iC it'l i"t't I� I7) i,.. W !-i 1 =a; f GY -r{ 77i r: iC'3 r r !r Ci ti ''^` 1� u O 'C7 1 i7'�: :z, jC `z -i r z 9 II H H 1 { r7 Z7 H ! I I i-7 jz !tR 'z r H 10 iC ;O Ir .D H z1 I z n 1-0H r iz i m+! jr C C !S '.f 1 it JS'z ' i7' M. i ir'l IC ';C �C I-i ;-i �H r I70 :M :tA -! \i i .z i 'C� IC '9 Im M :C; IH :In �� ' ,G itZ I Tyl rr, i i I z --t I D 'Cl) z 'CY i E I I i z ! p i ! i E I i 1 t:?: .. �; tp .+ ts' ..+ :11 r. tq O w '.' J'J tR i O! i D a rJ;N CO,In �'w \V W W A A t%: CJ rJ V V •.+ n+- ✓.+ WW co oa LRL'i 'JN VV NN �^ AA oc ?'? CI Ll OO a AA ! z� I m ! opo o o co olo a.'a CR LR c c o,o o o o o v V o c r J N o o opo o o c-o o o ola c o 0 0 o a J.? o o ;(r • r r r fl. r r i r 166 6 • • r r r c. t c a a It a a a c It I 'Z r SID D I µ { a+ ' r m m j Im m I m m i m m m m m co t m w a i i n n Z ,J C j T I Cr. T T T J ^• j C C j C:I >r 1 1 C9 I uz L' I m x n C.1 CC I V I C { C'i A W N •+ o I m j V I C j -Ll 1 � s+ .� a �+ t+ o r+ O I O I s+ ; O F '.S z la W C c o > c f x O C W W W a, I I. T I T m m I ' m 110i o o N { w ' ro o r. 0- M m Z i m j G ' m ! 3 I z m -w ! H { rr,II -a I m ' 1 N C + D ZT iI H € t N i L7 1 -i Do0 m � aD --i X Z I H i E z r { O € F O.Z' 'r ?W 0 j N Z €r, 1. O D ! 1 z x n f H Io r 3 c I n i H m ., i 'O z , m I.. G G m I - 1 O m D i rr I T H .'7. 1 ` rn I G i. C I --€ ' O n z j N ! z z I W Itv r i I I I G3 z I X. z I 1 z f I t 1 z - I I ii E n-c n-O C'-o 0-0 0 0 tO C7 0 ''? n 17 n a n 7 C, 1 C G O ",S O {S G s. O C 1 O ISO .T..v ?' I 0 S C O ' m £^1} t "m i i r -t+ i --€ -:'1 �; 1 .^'? ��; ? n t I: T ! m I Z Hi ro '..70 ^-'o -^;o ^c i^o ^c nCD M f;'-• a c X a € 1 Cl C A A Ll Ll I I A T A 1 w m to"' .y O% '--! '' '.'"t�: :-€r^ .-y"' -i O I-1 V !-1 V 1--1 W .-4'r, -€ j .0 `.•€a -i W 1 m z � -C G V G\ r• 10 9 0 t14 - O - ; W V G t,4 1 ,7aJ i-1 W1 -4 A Cl Gi -i C i-i^J -i m I c -i Ll -f W ri I W H W -i^J I m n :D I. ID D iD iD D D jD D D 3> I D € n o tr a I o o a Ira i a Io c c c o a o f ;'r7 n m V I V .••. .+ I V ✓ ; .+ .-+ � ✓ I .+ I .+ ..+. �..+:-.+w.+r-+ V .+ ! C T.t'7-r 1 it : i I CD i s a c a I o a I a I o a ; o a-a a aa a c N D 1 ao'cccca a :; n 'tT� n D m:> W W rJ - A A A I A AAS> AA '-?A W I tvO A -•4G7 L9 L" W W a I Cl .• A W ,-+• IcA w:-. ?AAA Ll LJ i "o C m r-:-i; ! I z t:f W Ij a a a a c c c o a a o o a o c c a ; c c -€ -{D 1 a c I: c { a o o'.a o c�c I o a C m a r a o o o a c is I c o o f occ caa ociC0 zN! aoa ccs a c i r o j I ! I I ! i k I I ! 4 € e n` € rJ f rJ. i r,;) J ; J rJ rJ IN rJ I r,., NCJ ro rJ fJ r1 I s'il rJ ! N \ I 'J r) ' .+ i rJ W o .+ I ,� ,., I r.+ i ru .+'._......+..+ i,J i O u-, N D 1 ' .? A I V Ll j ✓ A W V ' C I Ll ; A .�V'V V V V V A c i ,A.�: C W W n W m a a o ! 0 0 0 a ! c ! o 0 0 oD o o a ' c c o .+ o o c o c o s a ! ! H rTi m m m SJ m m i•1 m m i m , mi 1-cl'Ttt,;r I'1 m In m m I m z { X X X ! X { C X X X 1 X X X i X X"x x XXX x x ! -I [ o a I c a o c a c c a o o f j a a ! a l a a a I c a l a a a I 000acoa j o a t N a I c I a a a a a o I o c i c a c i o 0 o a a o i tJ I OT A ( A I Ll -O'Lr,C L'I Ery w n v H O : G I ✓ i W I C H j CR Gi A j •O rJ W a to W j+-•' 0 \ 1 z i z Z D W. I r a ... i. Ll I -I I CA z IN G -i C Ll C] 0 C ^C C C C C A7. ;0 f 1 C O G :U v I TI i -€ m I C7 O r J I z T O ;r1 m I m mmmmmC T ! w n T1 r Z I O r m X Lf)NNMNW ? Ti t ! ;0 z I i r? ti n m Zm i \ I n v r o € m I r I m D n I C7 r r z I ` N ; u7 r S t n I � i i rJ 00 ; t W ! +� � 'ta �+• oa w w 01 -• rJ r., ,• � ba € G ' b I W f-i W tr€ ,7. '.+.r o c 'l N V r .+.+ rJ'.', fJ rJ ? C L l C.^ NN m m �0 V {�-'r' C C rJ_J W W W W A A iC T T _W o V 0 c A A r I Z m ;oo ac 'tJN W W dao ao 'AA fJ rJ ioo N V loo m:-+ .+'J-O VUi c o oa 1 1 io0 oa TC cc loo co mm W W V oo (A LA aworJ I I I z M. OJ I_O ,M lm - ! 00 0: 0'.. O', O 0) ^ I 09 Y -€ 7n, -<� v 0? I V !\ I V I V V VI V.. 'Z V; V ! 0` I -• o I o iV I I o• ca > wl N cl k ,o € ;l I z , I N Ll IN I CN i v t 3! L" :I W i m D !N I o N r3 .Qi r;31 IN; 01 !'M O V u^ 0` .• C I 0", A Ll •+: •+' o. CJ; co I � ; I i.. 1 sJ. f r y I z n! E. yz 3 l D•. T e-•I; N I'm i D ,n I to !z+ I cn i r•. -oi zl t71 I L9 !'C I r C -< I m rp �. N �! Dt -t' I a 1 O cy i m i x I ;d 1 z' L : i z i N r O D U i)I O zl r I o r D z! r a m r{ D J) ' I ft z; n:to € �0 i z c i! i z I c n m Q i I ( I 1 n-^ n' 3 j n n n-V G SOT'G TG ".O O 1T00 1�, G. o ^o no •o ro ;^� aca P.a 66'' no: na n t o C.m �o �... To T.o T.c - c i3c c T.._ i.o F>` z c� tea,' 7C o I :K m �I w '--F'o { • W i 0�. -i M, --I a --€T: -i i -4 V z f - 0� ! ; . L^ •! i -i C -€ 0` mn0` C Ll O O T vL9 O O - - O u OOCC; O v' O w n C3 -ia �I T, a: D 3 T, ! D a D !. D D D m O: C= 11,71 n M. ; cn l a a a a a n o m ! i t € € + ! ! I ! i 1! I - (: € I i € ;i € I. n a"'t DI 1I €.D .•? N 'o ItA 'AA A;2+.A j >D NI. -81 w. a'. W� Ll a ..... .-� -:,. - i o c Cl c; a; a• Cl >,,... : m I 1! Zty I j O . o, -1 a o :�a l a €o to a a:c o c o a ! o ai ai c c, a c'CD c € "" , m o a a a 'c ;o a c c ts co a I o a ao o ' o a cl aj a' nj a: IIIt I ! �t i [ •I ! ! € f €. i i N t N - r3 N ;r3 j N r3 fJ:r3 r3 N r 3 N N r., r3'• r;31 3W �' N N r3 r3 f! CO \ I o €a o N !r3 yj rJ Cl, A N .-. .+ t C v7 -.r3 DI G 10` W «+ !.A V V�.V V v V V .A?. Cr V L'€i •• .A V i o i s o i W !0 0 o,c o c.o c a o: o 0•1 E • ! I l € i f 1 4 ! € ! i ! ! ! 1, i i 1'. f ! ;. { ! € €- !•-+ w o •a !o j a ,W !o c -cacao : Ll LI - o. a o. CD W: o o a t n W rl� CD CD :ococc oc a .A -. ;a :c to :o .-• ao o.caacc c vats it I I� O OI !f I m m m ';z r,l m t� ,t,t , t�:m mm€r €T€ ti l m. ao. mi rI n .n. I '�z !X i X X Ic X :x X x X x X x X X X X' X'I X' G' x XXX i�.-I ! 17 i o '•o !a :c c c a a c c o a o.� a. c: c'.. ... a a o t:"o I t o q.a o a of c c. a - c'..o ti' i 1 £ !� n j W W W w W w W W .+•,. LT3: C0 'X C•) L-1 "C Ll -b - a s L.€: O' m: O a.s a f Z i D VC V-V O V OD II N -n; z ^-LG G€ € c ! r 1 c .'c m :En 110 :.x;C N110 N.'-'• .,'.A r31 *J°; 0`• -i:.. C b 1 O m U) D Lni v C:.LR CO b Ll A: 03.' t' - x r iS r Cn 0-- EAc .D♦C,Ll -• 1 m;u r! E7: D.W n i t) I. Ix m m -a D a:>I. Z> -€ z' z' c I ,.z7 X jC _In Et En Ll 0 )v�.L� �� Ul .I I n l -n G m I i. I.0 Im p-, z rr) .m r T:�r.,f,m _I I -! S^. t .�7aI i -r!i 3> I .tea z r Im iiv IX I I c n: ts+� Gi :u'3C.m i -i IL1 .-7i I ! cc -i '7; H m.N t m { ZZ' I Z rl ijn I jl I i I I� IZ I 10 a h R. LI LF 10 ,A .+W. +fl W W v n.0. .•.r r r W'' G.`.A W 11 c.q,.+ �0, •l V V' o a v;v, V V. .0 O Ll.Llr3 r3 ✓r V!V 0 0 C.1.W W^�V V I Cl N W 01 C c o. .'A C. N N �' N 0l.> N 1 Z i 1i Lh Ll W.r3 ♦0 C) W Ll w c 0 0 0 ' -Ll c o a s o o -.0:-10 W 0`\, (A L3 V V CO 10 a L. N ra c o � �. a o o a ♦0 Iu A N i r co ao- Cl � �: - • • - • • is iM _ • —• - • - • _ iP s• V i` ' t`i ` `r !V ,b )I ja lµ I I z C: D D! i tv z W N .+ i c 10 CO V '?V` Ln I ? '41 rJ # z :-< o # z< it C 71 Cl 1 -> z ;a w 3 � 1 L7 #1 - O I0 v V c 'n µ 1 L: b v? I W a a? 1 - _ E4 A 0` I W r I I co W• I I i I I I i t S r I 0 0 DI D ;:T7 I,y m X I O z -'i t= (' c I P - I z I� c n # R! ' P z S j N C I m G I D j-1 n n -jr fsT C r I __4 Ci �Z z 14 I zI I� r *- D D ; z ecI M # (c Ir I -fz £ 0 2`: 1 i jN n I I # I I I j f II z ' f I Ir O-3 0-0 o C3-c rn T TCp y,j .TO G Tc -m< C'Cc c -ico C:a C'c o '.^o c-,o c o o r o ir^a j a o.. t i o, "3 i C m IA no .oc �o jCo I'T. O �.o :Icaa c �a �0 i. L• i ai T. o� � 1 3 z -ri -� C C.C T iT i D` a L'+ ! x M C i --1'10'a i-I '�Zo ,-t m '--i a ��.-i m 0'.CJ. • -i"' '--i m '-i •-4 k ^ Z ;a, O.? C-W c L G—0 G^C - LlV ,0^ O 6^I O V O ! n i Q -#.10 -!,b w -i V j--1,..> :-i vo -10` '.-i rJ,-:o i, 1 N '-i L, :-q c 0 I -i V! -i :D :D to :o c o ^c o o a c a v o o a c c a o c c o. i ?i C7 Jm I lµ lµ : I.-..+ >+ i Y V V i ✓.?'.?.-. V V �. '--'.-:.,•-µ.+•µ -. V. C c �c a o c c ca-ac c a o a a a a I O i o a c ! a c I o a:o a c c o i L7 M . > `A w v. A i w Ln c c.�:�Cl , 4; I c ! .., ,v:c a�:c in f1 1 ,i i i I # ! # # ! j ! j ! i # i ! ! I f # ;� C �i t I c l a o I I t c o a O # D Ia c Ic o a c I a c o o'.a o c c j a o ;a co a a a o cacao o ' o I o occaccl c. # <C2 ,; o io.... a L o CD I o j o i I I # I f , 1 i I i D .0 C i I ,ril ��J ;fJ J rJ iJ ru ril ( w W'w W N N I J �:J M) J w fJ fJ' rJ' # :.? \ p ru 1-3 ✓- �-- µ fJ I N f' fJ'..�i J fJ J to N I 0 >? rJ D I C V V A .+ W b .+ N ril N ry N N rc'rJ ? # r_ N 0` N.W co 0 0 o c a a o I a I cI a o a a o 0 0 w ! i ! :T,m m n n ?!?!fi m z mm -! m , nrl m I m jx x X x x x c x x x x i x _ I c xxxxxxxx x I -# 10 0 0 o c o o a a a o= O I o I o a'o o c c a o' o # c O o c c o a o_ I a c o c o 0 o c c a c a 1 N c a i oaoO a I a co oo CZ,C3, as # 3 j L.. Ica t o I c a o l c000 i s { a I Oo cacao c'; 1i I 1 I ;N J IN .,. W C C.zD C ! r L^ C.T mG`acO i z I ` is Iv Ln L,k Ln z D I �� z D wwwwww w; z. # c l C` - j�,r„r. C Cl -i =s -0 :7 3 --i 1 Lo N iJ V-0 t?I -i-. ! O ! of '�'! ;W o W z L) i C '-i C A I M I 1 z:. I ,"O i •CZ ! -i-#O z ;i ! to fP:m M 3 i C? I C7 -# U).. - C ;a r-q -i z C C= C,N N N --i k M 1 i I ' C 0 - a ;o , P'1 X0' n , u m 'O '� `v...N En IM t iy I N z C I �'..m-! I ri I C r r'r-_. 7 rl^?0 z k rws 11 70 it J z I J: "' I Z 1 -C iD H T z N ,..:o--i N f�i' !T'E' �. # m 3 I t I m n P m ^ z Im Z 0, 1 N V7 N Li Ci N a z'; C7 1 M m ( i -'1 j I ' D I 3 4Z N: -4: 1 N ! z r L,! co z a I I i co 1 , � 1 M ai t4 I 3 s W :& C` C`t, 10_ uW W w A JWLo , C - Dv ' µW 0`In 0` WAV Ln a) I z m h N N Oµco o o Ln Ln W W -W a O �o o Vµ Ln'µLn A Ln'.-• Ln Ln LR I ',c Ln N M,01 N µ 'a a N V c o 0`V rJ W Ln�i 0 Ln.? 0 13 0 0 Ci 1 I 1 do +r -b r to A i i i i i v --16 _ 40 fir b (r 1 O . i t � F � o► i Yi v ` s o t i _ ( t a, l 11Z 11 rn x j I i i i I #IE l• 1 ( zc l. 11 1 v f Lr E N A Vll Vi • iII T T M 7 p i C j Cj rrf r+ r I in IM. z r j z j I z E n; m, I o { j i :> 0 y i n D. I ( 3: Ijri i r! m f I Y ! o r-! `' I { i C =' X I -I D i rr! •'� I I ! G to, t I I rn I I mi I {I f z I O -.0 m 0-0 C) 0 � I-II i I 'C O Sp iy E I 'J - jT-.+ O tTl ! itiE 1 !i'# I - m i z T s-ti f- CD is jC7u. Lq 111 ! o t'� IGa .CA i0 j A :p V 0 Y' +-•,, QA; 00 C .c A 'O (A _•{ '�o --d r:. C :-d-0 -4 rJ a. -{.ai -4 O. J D I D D --t �a i� MT Ir- o :mac it a !.a - it r r 1 'D '+t 7 !C-3'1 11 j a acct o f c a'c nnan'coaana�:ac C i j o a a c o c a c o o ct a n c cc a n.o 0 1 D a a o a c a o c al c o-o o a o o a a s a:a 'C z i # 1 1 I + f C) 3>M D i W A I J.A A A A A A rJ j A A• Ai W A A A A A A A.A A A:A o ?A•A A A {'C O -•y ri W W W:4WWt,. it 1 - - W! A,.AAAW.h : , WGwW W W Nrr - W W i; C Mi 1 1 1 3, I i !, I i t ! 1 11 l i l t t + i- 1 i l i xl 1 : 1 i i i i i z C Lq3 CD a o o a a c o o a c r d o c'c c o o:-a c c c o o c a a iv 0 0 1 c c c c a o c c. a: a a,a c n. e o c c o-c a c c o o f,<7 N UP o n oao 0 a,o o o c c. of o;c c C c o clo c i o n n:.o a o f r {J rr") # t I - l f: +: # ! ! i 1-' rJ N r :-r,)t u-a rJ.J � =.'J r� rJ� N! ` - r", v rJ rJ rJ N �rJ rJ rJ r ,J rJ N rJ N I !A \ V 0 C o c c C c LT A V V V V V V V V V V V V V V i--W--i o c oo a a o o c a al o. o.c o a a o;a o 0 a a oancn_ a a E na o' W o.o Ccoc oCCCco rcn o I' Z W m a000aoc a I ac c', c d'ocaoaaoo :-o,:ono o i.-0iD . i a O 000 a 0a a O A O O: o a:O O a O G n n off;J o O O !•�--i �' V c: al .- o c c a a a o o c a a o n o a a l p •� I I i i I + i 1 # t ' s I l t i ! 1- I ! 1 ! I I 1 O O E s1 rr'! _r'S rt„#„;i'i rl #*'f 7 r'E' r ^•'rr{'-r-!.-#_! 'TS t'^{T7 ri ri,m,-'!M r# i z ' j X X X X-X X X X X X X X X: jr, X'X X X X X X X X X X X XX X X I -i UT o c oC .mac a n V� a c o.00C a o,Y 000a a c i''a i a c I o O` W w:,k W w.r _.7 .+ O_ •+I Ci N'.rJ J ti l ^J N.N ra 1\)rj ro rJ N"J W 1 •+^ •?.> N O rJ.rJ rJ rJ- i+-� N rJ rJ J A i z f c Lr I .,^ C'+ r0• C-i A i w .� a.; z.. ocv;aV -3� 10�Ioaco Lr i < C I AvrJ ^ ^'C'j:J 01 vO N: -ti rJ iIJOVo 'LJIli N W.rt 0 1:O rJ Z 1 Wu7 .A Lr�o Cr j JS Lr: L7'c,+:#^^ 0�-''d V 0•w V L`i c N O j < ! -i G'3. j C3 L-1-.0nV 10,-W F,L:.cA^.CCc i C7 "rl r7 -# 'l z; G7�;ML•3 G? II C 1: i 1 11 7-1 m Z : .,TJ i m0� "O: O� GCCCC CCC CCT � M t z C i Ti L: ti j ... sj,�-+ -� j N _ r+' r+ r-'r r r r r r- -r r_r r - !"a f \ I m m ;?:1 £ £ ^' C-; �.r-; t-+H�-+ +--+a ,..,r-` ra:-+a-: m I'O 7 NI I N N N L, z -0 � M:.. +„+. rri 171 r1 rr m r"t-r^i m m m to ri CII I -1 rC j z -u `> Lr}C:cl Enm0 m 0 u:i:;00 G'1 {,'Cry I I I i I j I i H {iz N. i I p' i I j l: WI rJ V Cr N"J: t? V r rJ j *' 10 i D j A A a ^_ n r,A rJ .+ -0 '' W -A W vS C� V V W rJ'.W C4, J r., G.' :r.W A Cly I.C I rJ ."J 0'3` o N A W ac.� V W:+i 'V o V rJ rJ- A (u rJ W V.A V V.o p-n`0 ra 1= I i z ! rM IN r) �Y 9C0 = N '^�V N �Cr Tw ^^ NN. oc VN CrVAv`V c.+V aV J.. 'W A �,.--t Co Crr V JL+I >V-Q o o V.: V. 0` 01• ao m •+V V:,^,. N V V 9.AaCr -f c\ .' t1lb —ti �i t� +16 Jl 6 L In b L (r a ` I i I ✓ . u D D! Ip :p !p ',,y".•. p p co ' co I Y p ; TTI :7 -� Ln iA W E P:7 iw 'a IV p IV ILn ? I W , N 1 A �' j z c I. c c h o c o a a ala 1 ? ? LR A NJ u ? I? L,i J, W I z o �0` %, I-C1 I j£ 1£ G € z I""'!i I'F ,,r y� im j D I O i r i I� I I +�_L I # r 1 I z iT ,T I. I(!-: i£ Ir -i z I iX is a x A ! i i-4IA S z 11 ip j;= i A i o 1 --qZ �� I �..{ IN MI a to ,-i I•N IFj cr .;� T ! p ,CD JD b ( :fi N Z } I izz c H c z �� +?' r i1 j i m 10 X tr r i �-1 Eix. cI { I M # II z # 1 1I H i I [ nn n n n c nn n; n in , -0 O S S:I > r 0 1 II m - # A f H a n^ rnozT? n L7 Lill 0 L11 p --#' I I I i .v -i:p .I A -i',w ...�W -1 --#LF --i v p -i ^ -i �.. I"#z A -C _ Iry O o 0,-- '.P+ u.a O O.a O? O';? O;c 0 A V p 0 . V -4 .p .. -i L -F-3 --!'.V p? r-# S ? I m n al a- a" D a! D'.. Dj Di D D # ^ I :-1 n i f!l 1 1 i if iv jo o i ;c �V L.R T _• _. i { i„s D i ' ? c W ? .>?::?? A:?. •W ,: 1W i? !A �? W A.� ; fJ A I ,... a -40 a'. 1 Ic iflai j� i i 1 1 z WUl I o la a coac co c a a Ic a o cc j a a a 'oa c o c a c a I # C P7 ril rJ I J fJ rJ rJ dJ r0 P., raN ., !µ r11-.3rJ W fJ ! p \ fJ#V PJ V o.,V a oV !Ln ? I? a L. p Lq c } b D W a b a a s ! '^ io fJ a a -, i H I i?} T! !,`�! -^•'4 ff'.^ .* ", !!:} ;�1 !'l ?.1 IrR :r'! :rR r'':^ r�: ! i G O! iX X IX X X X:x X X X I I tTS ! A z ! X X X X x X 'X X?G X X #. I ! ! j! i i t ! # i I I 1 !1 :t I I ! # i f la a o ,a a 'c a a a b a a la a a c -. o ! I ? I a - �l a !c cj a i i o I 'W !? Iz IA I^ Q,? I n IJ P£-+ !p .,... v'.V,?. .�^ 10` a '.�''„ 'J O '', Iw `0,-> 3 V I z p •+ W ii V V"0`�O p V t u •.+ IH. a IC W Cl 3 1 ? f O LR - IZ1.n 'H `V c A I I✓ lin �£ # !-+ -� 11Th,' D D'..D D a a. ��� !10 @ I� .A (� M� � r , --# i til IA rn _0 �� i'n r- IP' E. I0 �n :a r H (ziw -r c .r to n Ll # I n d -1 GO n H H art L� Iz Q �z Aa Iz I I �7 ID 'G h r? z I L17 ' N I ; f I I I I I z ro w a `^ CA W rJ rJ rJ il w oc rJp s a_i fJ'J ac r? A ^ wW w p-- o p rJ -J LnLn i c 7i N 01 a rJ W rJ..: V•• .-•..-• Ll rR rJ l± •-••+ Ln LR aT w G L. C 6 `O '0 i Z m! N CR ,)V p•R rJ rJ a o 0,0, :0 CR R �C t7 o a U -Ln V c p1- , r1 ? 0 c o A V V V0 V p V ao co A.A oa CD X0.0 r0•Ln p 2 L C I -i O p a z �; D Di 1 I :It I V ,I Ut llx t-C o; i tvilzM t i c i z M; i.X k j €€ i E cn z cla I { I i I a { a i= So s o s s rn t T 'n o ^o o- '} i s 1- I -i i t zcm -C D ;T"'O, I r j I O it C I• C C' I "Ti iiZ T`I f N Cr '� I i a a o c i t3 i 'D M.D' ,C u3 u rn a ( 1 tt o c c ! 1 rri I rJ O coLrl D; I 1 { W o c o CD a o c i s+^, CD P-1 n t z O • ' 1 I l 1 J I X X X X 11 -i i (. r 1 1 t o � o I I a a o o a i L7 I C` -i '5 0` rJ 1 0 j I I n 0` Cl C`, i I F 1 1 I I T -i £ m ain i Iz j I C7 1 7 1 x -n w r , i I j j J7 '-I I O M u7 i D CO t I:Cl I rJ O D 9 C9 W rJ rJI - ! G7 i i W rJ to c o 0�0 �+ rJ i z j V\ c IL k c k i IL _ I z D Li G O) O OOS p W O - -f _ ,. ry^ r .a- "...' i r._: " ^J rJ Pl ^•� rJ �V � ri'-.x r .I m v c 0 !4. LJ ri o ! m! -t c I I ^J fJ': c 7 LJ N 1 r'tO C. S.TF. .r 1;u >" M K e1 I z! z. �0 r � z r r D r 1 3 C I r1 0, rill v r!1 I { 1 D M i I CZ O ± Z-073T "� < TG GG Tc i.G< CGG CCG SG = G iC 3.c IM C') 0 ^jc ra as aa^ as fSo rI a ; c (ja a r o ± Crt J ix o �o 0 0' 7C o �a a a a x,,- �c � ^ Olrc a ei C, a I Wrt C. �--t M -4100 m W; O LS m -.410 CO --1 10 0 -i O i M.z ;0 -C 'O p Oo ac Oo 0 10 V.0.0 C.'1O•v CIO O O OrJ V 0 M 1 mr -i -i-b. -4 0 W V u L" -1 10 ! m r 'D D DD D D D D D ! "l T O .:•• oaa aoo c a a a o a o a o o c o o a o a a a o aoa i r T - a+�:..+ rs ..:•+ .+«+v.+ CII ✓ �; -µ Ll^'✓ I C T.;^M oac o c c o 0 0 0 aoa .moo a ^o oaa o oa o o acc c o aaa c o a i ?^] C1;i. D to N w A W^J r J N A o A PO A.rJ c rJ W rJ A A A N rJ -'Llµ W Aa L=! oW c0Ll L10a rJ c c.+o a 00aµW a 0Ll ! -0O !'*i r-!-i I I i t I i 1 1 1 1 E t :! i I ! z C r;1 a c a c a o a o a o 0 0 o c c o 0 o a c o o aaa s -i D . aac a ca aaa a caaa c acc'a oaa i � r''I aao_ o c o o a a c o o c oac a c a ca?a c o ! G r is Gi CD a o a c a o o a a o 0 0 o a e a c c a e c a a o a I r a 10 ^ N rJ N N^,r J rJ ,i rJ N N N NJ r-.)[ r) r:i r J ril µ r J rJ rJ r J rci N rJ N i ch \ W W w N N N N p r� .+µ..+ 0. a .-+r .+ rii .+v i O:n N D .O V p oaa .0 O 0 mm S CO.D .p 4: 0 1 'w H V ao t,7aoo a aaCD - i 'r W m o o a a o 0 0 o a o a Claa o aaa a a a a a o 0 o a i -0 D o a a o a o a c o c a o o a c o a a o �a 7-i M I aaca oO o oa ooa caA to rJ oaa a aoo a N oc O r1 rt r'E .-e�•-! r'-t t 1Z m':'l R7 is<r=.:, i „,tTi T!Fl -a : i ;Tt r1M -r M M I mz X X x ;x x X x x x x x x x x x x x x x x c x x x x x x x 1 -i i i ! i r ! ! 1 CD CD o c a o 0 0 o a o a c a o a c a c 'o �:o a o 0 o aaa I I aoo �o ao a ee aaa a_a .o o aaa c o oaoa c oc 1 LAS i - I aac ,aaa o� 0000a000 a aaca o :o oa^ ! oaa 1 -t3; - paa ',o ,po c. oo aoa voo 'a o oaa .c 'a oaa pa ± L-!G7 L•1 !A .�o O 1 r I D D D i V W V D• Cl Ll I O 'j7 r�7 ''�47 ;7^G7 L'3 O ,r"1 L7 F '. G7 103 V iLl_r;LIL Ll ^ D DvD .�i D DDD D D DD F z. ! O O O N QA coC 1 i A>-:-.+.+ I z L'i 3 -1 G �lOQ O C 00 I O rrr l I V lArmonti O 1a r- fl, rrr i i ti H H N 10 V' !--! ^'h Q zzz wV z N0 C7,wwWWW r z z z z r- z z z z z z z z 1 rn ril m Pl is rJ I T a.0 W rJµ W A 9 I rr1 r1!::m rn -+ ;n r1 to PI rn M rn r'n I I o V W W '! O j D I I rpt: LI U _ Wcrl�vaV.w WoA V a iG ! -W , z I �� I i z.z z z z z z z r r''E { rill: t O o 1 z. .0 1 \ 1 1 \ 1 W V Lri" " µ W w O W A w W A rJ rJ µ I O D v :'J C o'vi N c W W'O N rJ -o o w W LI •0 LI rJ I ^ ^ li za10 .+W Vc .0.0 v7 L.LI Ll 0.O. L^Cr-0- .^0` uµ oµ 00 VwoVc 0 -.O LI L-1 12 1 z m v7 ^`µ01 W V A.+ A A O.+w ^"..J' 03 070707 0o cµ O`A07 oa LI W :^µms CD .010 I Ll co 0 0 V W 00 Ll V V V Vel V V V o o �O a V Ll W 0 0 4 V j N'.0 V WSCl O 1 I 3 i z rJ C .rs o j Y,c .+i .. _ i C. 1 I ! I i I n I C G 1 i i i I • I I I I - '' � v ' i i D i ! I r Iz i is Ci f I i i z t j - 2• m 1 1 0 o c i C m ti G --I co G m z -C SI 010 i M t'l y•• a I m n D I S n i r I mSG m t m r r zr T - to a a W 7 t t i L'3 D D L4 Un ! m oo Z t70 i-+ a ! I c I C n N D CD c t n W m I ''a1i -i c o i I-i •j 1 '1 mm i z - I j D X X f --I ! roc I iD CD I I -ZI D D i z I 1 C 0 i7 i C I ; I i in m j fn rrtm { m 70 I -3 • ro I w 1 «� I � 1D L.�1 tp A d i z m j o v w , i V Cl �i CITY OF ATASCADERO FINANCE DIRECTOR'S REPORT SEPTEMBER 1, 1983 TO SEPTEMBER 30 , 1983 EXPENSE LISTING PAYROLL DATED 09/07/83 CHECKS #11463-11548 52,102. 79 PAYROLL DATED 09/21/83 CHECKS #11549-11637 50,471.10 VOID CK#17733-17739 DATED 09/09/83 (184.01) VOID CK#14423 CK. REG. DATED 03/08/83 (62. 50) VOID CK#177764 CK. REG. DATED 09/30/83 (450. 00) TOTAL $101,877.38 25 j M�ETjNG AGENDA E /o /o o ITEM • M E M 0 R A N D U M TO: CITY MANAGER October 4 , 1983 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP AT 5-83 LOCATION: 2900 San Fernando Road (Lot 12, Block 26) APPLICANT: Mr,. and Mrs. Greg Filipponi (Dennis Bethel & Associates) REQUEST: To allow division of 12.6 acres of land into three parcels of approximately 4. 2 acres each. On October 3, 1983 , the Planning Commission conducted a public hear- ing on the subject matter unanimously (with Commissioner Sherer and Chairman Lilley absent) approving issuance of a Conditional Negative Declaration and approval of the three way land division request sub- ject to Conditions 1-15 as listed in the attached Staff Report. There was only brief discussion among the Commission concerning the application. Dennis Bethel, representing the applicant, concurred with the recom- mended conditions. i No one else appeared on the matter . LAWRENCE STEVENS Y L WARDEN Planning Director City Ma ager ,I CITY OF ATASCADERO • Planning Department October 3, 1983 STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP AT 5-83 LOCATION: 2900 San Fernando Road (Lot 12, Block 26) APPLICANT: Mr. and Mrs. Greg Filipponi (Dennis Bethel & Associates) REQUEST: To allow division of 12. 6 acres of land into three parcels of approximately 4. 2 acres each. BACKGROUND 1. Existing Zoning: RS (Residential Suburban) 2. General Plan: Suburban Single Family Residential 3. Environmental Determination: An Initial Study Environmental De- scription form has been completed by the applicant. The Planning • Director has prepared a draft Conditional Negative Declaration indicating the project will not have a significant adverse effect upon the environment if certain mitigation measures are incorpora- ted into the project. 4. Site Conditions: The lot is basically situated in an area of two grades. The lower portion of the lot slopes down away from the road to a winter stream channel. From the stream channel to the rear property line, the grade climbs steeply. Vegetation consists of natural grasses with trees and rock outcrops on the steep side. The lot is vacant, and most of the surrounding properties are also undeveloped. 5. Project Description: The applicant requests permission to divide his 12. 6 acre parcel into three lots of approximately 4. 2 acres each. The proposed lot design would provide for one lot with frontage on San Fernando Road and two lots with frontage along a proposed road accessing through adjacent Lot 20 from Santa Ana Road. The proposed road would be parallel to and just inside the rear property line. 6. Determination of Minimum Lot Size: Review of the five generalized performance criteria (Section 9-3.144) for this specific parcel establishes a minimum lot size as follows: Tentative Parcel Map AT 583 (Filipponi) Lot Size Factor Average slope (20.17%) . 75 Distance from center (10 - 12, 000) .30 Access (paved, < 15% slope) .40 Septic suitability (severe) 1. 50 General neighborhood character (6.25 ac) 1. 25 Required minimum lot size: 4.20 acres The size of lot requested meets the required minimum lot size. 7 . Subdivision Review Board: On May 2, 1983 the Subdivision Review Board met with the applicant' s engineer , Dennis Bethel, to review this project. Members of the Board in attendance were Larry Stevens, Planning Director ; Vern Elliott, Fire Captain; Patience West, Senior Engineering Technician; Kami Griffin, Planning In- tern; and Fred Buss, Associate Planner . Discussion centered around the minimum lot size requirements and the proposal of a road along the rear property line from Santa Ana Road. Staff in- dicated such a road would be required to meet City minimum speci- fications as a public road since it would be serving five or more total lots. An agreement among all parties concerned with crea- tion of the road would be necessary to ensure that the road is built to allow access off the rear of all created lots. ANALYSIS The applicant has proposed creation of a road from the bend of, Santa Ana Road across adjacent Lot 20 to his property'. This road would facilitate access to lots created at the rear of the parcel since site topography makes access from San Fernando Road difficult, expen- sive, and environmentally and aesthetically unwise. Staff favors this approach and a number of other applicants with adjacent lot split pro- posals have agreed to provide equal access easements and improvements along the rear property lines of their lots. An agreement has been signed by all the parties involved (attached) to build such a road. It should also be noted that a Lot Line Adjustment between this lot (Lot 12) and adjacent Lot 11 has been tentatively approved and the Fi- nal Map is being processed through Staff. FINDINGS 1. The creation of three lots with a minimum lot size of 4 . 2 acres. on this parcel conforms to all applicable zoning and subdivision regulations and is consistent with the General Plan. 2. The creation of three lots in conformance with the recommended conditions of approval will not have a significant adverse effect upon the environment, and the preparation of an Environmental Im- pact Report is not necessary. 2 Tentative Parcel Map AT 5.83 (Filipponi) 3. Creation of a new road along the rear property line to serve lots created along the ridge of the hill is appropriate and will result in the negation of adverse environmental impacts associated with the extensive grading of Tong driveways from San Fernando Road. RECOMMENDATION Based upon the above Findings, the Planning Department recommends: A) Issuance of a Conditional Negative Declaration as follows: 1. Adequate provisions shall be made for drainage and erosion control and protection in conjunction with site development and road development. 2. Adequate provision shall be made in the design of the private sewage disposal systems to minimize effects on natural water- courses. 3. Grading and tree removal shall be minimized during all phases of site development; and, B) Approval of Tentative Parcel Map AT 5-83 subject to the following conditions: 1. Private sewage disposal systems will be an acceptable method of sewage disposal if reports and designs are acceptable. All tests, reports and designs shall conform to methods and guidelines prescribed by the Manual of Septic Tank Practice and other applicable City ordinances. The following _ Note shall appear on the Final Map: "Appropriate soils reports including a percolation test, a test to determine the presence of ground water, and a log of a soil boring to a minimum depth of ten (10) feet shall be submitted to the Planning Department prior to the issuance of a building permit. Where soils reports indicate the conven- tional soil absorption systems are not acceptable, City ap- proval of plans for an alternative private sewage disposal system, designed by a Registered Civil Engineer , shall be re- quired. Depending upon the system, more restrictive require- ments may be imposed. " 2. Water shall be obtained from the Atascadero Mutual Water Com- pany and water lines shall exist at the frontage of all par- cels prior to filing of the Final Map. 3. All other available utilities not already in place shall be extended underground to each parcel frontage at the time of . building permit. Any utility easements are to be shown on the Final Map. 3 Tentative Parcel Map AT 583 (Filipponi) 4. Efforts shall be made to minimize grading that would be dis- ruptive to the natural topography and removal of existing, mature trees. The following shall appear as a Note on the Final Map: "No trees shall be removed without compliance with applicable City ordinances. No grading shall commence'' without an appro- priate permit and compliance with applicable City ordinances. 5. Drainage and erosion control plans, prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer , shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Department prior to issuance of building permits in conjunction with installation of private driveways, ac- cess easements or buildings. 6. Roof materials for all structures shall be Class C rating or better and a Note to that effect shall appear on the Final Map. 7. Plan and profile drawings of proposed individual driveway(s) and driveway easements shall be submitted for approval by the Public Works and Planning Departments in order to determine average grade and appropriate improvement requirements. If average slope exceeds 12% , paved improvement would be a re- quirement at the time of application for a building permit. Otherwise, an all-weather surface would be required similarly In no event will driveways be allowed which exceed 20% in slope. The driveway access shall be improved to a minimum width of twelve (12) feet and shall have a minimum unobstruc- ted vertical clearance of fourteen (14) feet. Notes to these effects shall appear on the Final Map. 8. All pipelines and other easements of record shall be shown on the Final Map. A letter shall be submitted: from each utility company indicating the nature and extent of any building re- strictions. A Note stating any such restrictions shall appear on the Final Map. 9. Drainage swales shall be indicated on the Final Map and a Note shall appear on the Final Map which states: "Any modification of the ground during site; development with- in fifty (50) feet of the drainage swales shall be subject to approval by the Planning and Public Works Departments. " 10. A new road shall be constructed from Santa Ana Road to the southeastern corner of the subject parcel to City standards including a minimum paved width of 20 feet with three feet of graded shoulder on each side of the paving prior to re- cordation of the Final Map. a) Improvement drawings shall make provision for the exten- sion of utilities including electricity, gas (if avail- able) , water and fire hydrants. 4 Tentative Parcel Map AT 583 (Filipponi) b) The applicant shall enter into an inspection agreement with the City for inspection of said improvements. c) Improvement drawings, including improvements to control grading and erosion within the road right-of-way, shall be submited to the Public Works Department for review and approval. d) Fire hydrants of a type and size determined by the Plan- ning and Fire Departments shall be installed along this road in locations determined by the Fire Department. e) Offers- of dedication, as necessary, to the public for road purposes for a full 40 feet shall be shown on the Final Map. Said offers shall be coordinated with and be contingent on similar offers across Lot 20 of Block 26, which leads to the subject property from Santa Ana Road. Precise location of the road dedications shall be re- viewed and approved by the Planning and Public Works Departments. f) The applicant shall complete all improvements prior to acceptance of the Final Map or shall enter into an agreement with the Public Works Department to guarantee installation of improvements within one year of the date of recordation of the Final Map. A performance guaran- tee, bond, certificate of deposit, or similar arrange- ment shall be made in conjunction therewith. 11. The applicant shall request a road name for the proposed road which shall be shown on the Final Map and which shall comply with the following requirements: a) All road names shall be of Spanish origin or shall be .--the names of non-living persons of historical importance., b) Road names shall not be duplicative of nor similar to other road names within the City of Atascadero or in the nearby unincorporated areas of San Luis Obispo County. 12. Lot Line Adjustment LA 830615 :1 (AT 83-179) for this appli- cant shall be recorded prior to recordation of this Final Map. 13. All conditions herein specified shall be complied with prior to filing of the Final Map. 14. A Final Map in compliance with all conditions set forth here- in shall be submitted for review and approval in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City Lot Division Ordi- nance prior to recordation. 5 Tentative Parcel Map AT -r83 (Filipponi) a. Monuments shall be set at all new property corners cre- ated and a Registered Civil Engineer or licensed land surveyor shall submit a letter certifying that the mon- uments have been set prior to recordation of the Final Map. b. A recently updated preliminary title ' report shall be submitted for review in conjunction with the processing of the Final Map. 15 . Approval of this Tentative Parcel Map shall expire two years from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted pursuant to a written request prior to the expira- tion date. ACTION The Planning Commission should, by motion, direct Staff as deemed appropriate. REPORT PREPARED B F BUSS A ociate Planner laREPORT APPROVED BY: 4 LAWRENCE STEVENS Planning Director Ps 6 its AT o bi355 ZySo 14 8955 19 A, . lt�cn rr 20 12 ass. 27 9 P� R 93SS ((Bob O10 1i 300 21 26 117CY� 22 10 3j2o 1740` It5o5 JI556 9 t_ 28 2523 24 3�3p qob 25 q�o5 7 $ s n3os I iso 26 24 3co 32eo 4 27 23 - R S (FH) o,o° 28 ! D'i X13 29 30 22 quos iog.th" r �Ip L2lo4F� ,pQ00 30 60 31 32 / 31 a"10 foo° 0 16 cFlS� 14 X0100 / 3S 24 j,Q to lCP / 20 (0100 s ,n.+ S �NRF� �zh, NCy 1 Y 35•-i 7. .i.33 - r N 35 ,E_ 406_3Z I _ .I tb 71 C. 04, I f � r a j+D -1r1� cn °Z N o ID m t ri 4, Z r A R r. C) � D p 42a n O m ip h /y p p p e 1�rrn 3c �'z C n m = fT1 CO co {Cf) R dry/ J/ ro OV Fit iz �1 ��•tt � N>8 Q t ° r 1 $ o L li' I Iry � ,n'� /S 'af _ - is a'Y• a^ Y• _ _ Or- hollf i N:� AGENDAITEM#- � M E M O R A N D U M TO: CITY MANAGER October 4, 1983 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP AT 8-83 LOCATION: 9855 Laurel Road (Lot 8, Block 42) APPLICANT: Fred and Gail Werner (Twin Cities Engineering) REQUEST: To allow division of approximately eight acres into two parcels of four acres each. On October 3 1983 the Planning Commission conducted public > g a hearingon the subject matter unanimously with Commissioner Sherer J y ( and Chairman Lilley absent) approving issuance of 'a Conditional Negative Declaration and approval of the two way land division request subject to Conditions 1-12 as set forth in the attached Staff Report. There was only brief discussion by the Commission concerning this application. Allen Campbell, representing the applicants, appeared and indicated his agreement with the Staff recommendation, A PdCE STEVENS MUR Y WARDEN Planning Director Cit Manager ps I i.ia - 1979q { CITY OF ATASCADERO � EROj Planning Department October 3 , 1983 STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP AT 8-83 LOCATION: 9855 Laurel Road (Lot 8, Block 42) APPLICANT: Fred and Gail Werner (Twin Cities Engineering) REQUEST: To allow division of approximately eight acres into two parcels of four acres each. BACKGROUND 1. Existing Zoning: RS (Residential Suburban) 2. General Plan: Suburban Single Family Residential 3. Environmental Determination: The applicant has completed an Ini- tial Study Environmental Description form. The Planning Director has prepared a draft Conditional Negative Declaration indicating the project will not have a significant adverse effect upon the environment if certain mitigation measures are incorporated into the project. 4. Site Conditions: This is a fairly level lot located on the corner of Laurel Road and Santa Lucia Road. A third side is bounded by Graves Creek (Reservation No. 7) . The lot' s highest point is in the center close to Santa Lucia Road. Vegetation consists of nat- ural grasses. Both Santa Lucia and Laurel Roads are improved to City standards and fire hydrants are located along each road. 5. Project Description: The applicant requests permission to divide approximately eight acres of land into two parcels of four acres each. The proposed lot design would create parcels with frontage (narrow side) along Laurel Road. 6 . Determination of Minimum Lot Size: Review of the five generalized performance criteria (Section 9-3. 144) for this specific parcel establishes a minimum lot size as follows: Lot Size Factor Average slope (2.7%) . 50 Distance from center (12 - 14 ,000) .40 Access (paved, t 15% slope) .40 Septic suitability (severe) 1. 50 General neighborhood character (4.82 acres) .96 Required minimum lot size: 3. 76 acres i • Tentative Parcel Map AT 8-83 (Werner) The size of lot requested meets the required minimum lot size. 7. Subdivision Review Board: On September 1, 1983the Subdivision Review Board met with the applicant' s representatives, John White and Linda Roach. Members of the Board in attendance were: Larry McPherson, Public Works Director ; Mike McCain,'; Fire Captain; Mi- chele Reynolds, Assistant Civil Engineer ; Shirley Moore, Planning Commissioner ; and Fred Buss, Associate Planner.' The Board had no comments except to confirm that the lots meet the minimum required size. ANALYSIS - - Lot configuration and size meet all the minimum requirements. Water and fire hydrants are already in place and the lot is large enough that septic systems should not be a problem. Staff has no comments concerning this lot. FINDINGS 1. The creation of two lots with a minimum lot size': of 3.76 acres on this parcel conforms with all applicable zoning and subdivision regulations and is consistent with the General Plan. 2. The creation of two lots in conformance with the recommended con- ditions of approval will not have a significant adverse effect upon the environment and the preparation of an Environmental Im- pact Report is not necessary. RECOMMENDATION Based upon the above Findings, the Planning Department recommends: A) Issuance of a Conditional Negative Declaration as follows: 1. Adequate provision shall be made in the design and location of the private sewage disposal system to minimize effects on natural water courses; and, B) Approval of Tentative Parcel Map AT 8-83 subject to the following conditions : 1. Private sewage disposal systems will be an acceptable method of sewage disposal if reports and designs are acceptable. All tests, reports and designs shall conform to methods and guidelines prescribed by the Manual of Septic Tank Practice and other applicable City ordinances. The following Note shall appear on the Final Map: 2 • r Tentative Parcel Map AT 8-83 (Werner) "Appropriate soils reports including a percolation test, a test to determine the presence of ground water , and a log of a soil boring to a minimum depth of ten (10) feet shall be submitted to the Planning Department prior to the issuance of a building permit. Where soils reports indicate the conven- tional soil absorption systems are not acceptable, City ap- proval of plans for an alternative private sewage disposal system, designed by a Registered Civil Engineer , shall be re- quired. Depending upon the system, more restrictive require- ments may be imposed. " 2. Water shall be obtained from the Atascadero Mutual Water Com- pany and water lines shall exist at the frontage of all par- cels prior to filing of the Final Map. 3. All other available utilities not already in place shall be extended underground to each parcel frontage at the time of building permit. Any utility easements are to be shown on the Final Map. 4. Efforts shall be made to minimize grading that would be dis- ruptive to the natural topography and removal of existing, mature trees. The following shall appear as a Note on the Final Map: "No trees shall be removed without compliance with applicable City ordinances. No grading shall commence without an appro- priate permit and compliance with applicable City ordinances. 5. Drainage and erosion control plans, prepared by a Registered Civil Engiineer , shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Department prior to issuance of building per- mits in conjunction with installation of private driveways, access easement or buildings. 6. Roof materials for all structures shall be Class C rating or better and a Note to that effect shall appear on the Final Map. 7. Plan and profile drawings of proposed individual driveway (s) and driveway easements shall be submitted for approval by the Public Works and Planning Departments in order to determine average grade and appropriate improvement requirements. If average slope exceeds 12%, paved improvement would be a re- quirement at the time of application for a building permit. Otherwise, an all-weather surface would be required similarly In no event will driveways be allowed which exceed 20% in slope. The driveway access shall be improved to a minimum width of twelve (12) feet and shall have a minimum unobstruc- ted vertical clearance of fourteen (14) feet. Notes to these effects shall appear on the Final Map. 3 i • Tentative Parcel Map AT 8-83 (Werner) 8. All pipelines and other easements of record shall be shown on the Final Map. A letter shall be submitted from each utility company indicating the nature and extent of any building re- strictions. A Note stating any such restrictions shall appear on the Final Map. 9 . Drainage swales shall be indicated on the Final Map and a Note shall appear on the Final Map which states: "Any modification of the ground during site development with- in fifty (50) feet of the drainage swales shall be subject to approval by the Planning and Public Works Departments. " 10. All conditions herein specified shall be complied with prior to filing of the Final Map. 11. A Final Map in compliance with all conditions set forth here- in shall be submitted for review and approval in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City Lot Division Ordi- nance prior to recordation. a. Monuments shall be set at all new property corners cre- ated and a Registered Civil Engineer or licensed land surveyor shall submit a letter certifying that the mon- uments have been set prior to recordation of the Final Map. b. A recently updated preliminary title report shall be submitted for review in conjunction with the processing of the Final Map. 12. Approval of this Tentative Parcel Map shall', expire two years from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted pursuant to a written request prior to the expira- tion date. ACTION The Planning Commission should, by motion, direct Staff as deemed appropriate. REPORT PREPARED BY: ,C Jfif%z-1 FR BUSS A ociate Planner REPORT APPROVED BY: y' LAWRENCE STEVENS Planning Director 4 �a O � 6 B00000 550 15 r"fi \ 051P 5 / FA �4 4 •Q O0 38 3 N (0100 R s(FH) ' u 45 — \` .4 r. O T 52 7/ -6 43 _ z 5 - �E o GRP` y 1tJ9ly a - SA L V � 50 0* 2 5 4.2- f �� !1275� 4855 t _ 0 _ a 6 P 9005 Cl 40 �0 5 o t1�b510 q�85 h 49 i ► a. y 9 to S 3 h Y 4 6 r \ c 12 13 ' q 0 S 0 E a to gg45 p G GRAVES h , S 9 Oa 14 o ADZ 3 14A148 8 qno� az 7 \�� 4 `m 2 A� 15 1 \� p 22 h 9c 4 <IPP 18 t7 _ 21 3 �vl0� ^p tS 95TH Q � a �Q a i � J a 41. 144 1 010, 9Y I I ii ING AGENDA / ITEM �P • M E M O R A N D U M TO: CITY MANAGER October 4 , 1983 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP AT 4-83 LOCATION: 3000 San Fernando Road (Lot 11, Block 26) APPLICANT: Mr . and Mrs. Jerry Frederick, Mr . and Mrs. Donald Messer, Mr. and Mrs. Dennis Bethel (Bethel & Associates) REQUEST: To allow division of approximately 16.8 acres of land into four parcels of 4 . 2 acres each. On October 3, 1983, the Planning Commission conducted a public hear- ing on the subject matter unanimously (with Commissioner Sherer and Chairman Lilley absent) approving issuance of a Conditional Negative Declaration and approval of the four way land division request sub- ject to Conditions 1-15 as listed in the attached Staff Report. There was only brief discussion among the Commission concerning the application. Dennis Bethel, representing the applicants, concurred with the recom- mended conditions. No one else appeared on the matter . 41t�LAWRENCE STEVENS AYL WARDEN Planning Director Ci y Ma ager Ror—nn �n'r r. i97e CITY OF ATAS CADE RO Planning Department October 3 , 1983 STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP AT 4-83 LOCATION: 3000 San Fernando Road (Lot 11, Block 26) APPLICANT: Mr. and Mrs. Jerry Frederick, Mr. and Mrs. Donald Messer, Mr . and Mrs. Dennis Bethel (Bethel and Associates) REQUEST: To allow division of approximately 16. 8 acres of land into four parcels of 4. 2 acres each. BACKGROUND 1. Existing Zoning: RS (Residential Suburban) 2. General Plan: Suburban Single Family Residential 3. Environmental Determination: An Initial Study Environmental De- scription form has been completed by the applicant. The Planning Director has prepared a draft Conditional Negative Declaration indicating the project will not have a significant adverse effect upon the environment if certain mitigation measures are incorpora- ted into the project. 4. Site Conditions: The lot is basically situated in an area of two grades. The lower portion of the lot slopes down and away from San Fernando Road to a winter stream channel. From the stream channel, the grade climbs steeply to the rear of the lot. Vegeta- tion consists of natural grasses with trees and rock outcrops on the steep side. The lot is vacant and most of the surrounding properties are also undeveloped. 5. Project Description: The applicants request permission to divide their approximately 16.8 acre parcel into four lots of 4.2 acres each. The proposed lot design would provide for two lots with frontage on San Fernando Road and two lots with frontage along a proposed road accessing through adjacent Lots 20 and 12 from Santa Ana Road. The proposed road would be parallel to and just inside the rear property line. 6. Determination of Minimum Lot Size: The review of the five gen- eralized performance criteria (Section 9-3.144) for this specific parcel establishes a minimum lot size as follows: • • Tentative Parcel Map AT 4-83 (Frederick/Messer/Bethel) Lot Size Factor Average slope (13. 5%) . 75 Distance from Center (10-12, 000) .30 Access (paved, < 15% slope) .40 Septic suitability (severe) 1. 50 General Neighborhood Character (6.3 acres) 1.. 25 Required minimum lot size: 4.20 acres The size of lot requested meets the required minimum lot size. 7. Subdivision Review Board: On May 2, 1983 the Subdivision Review Board met with the applicants, Don Messer and Dennis Bethel, to review the project. Members of the Board in attendance were: Larry Stevens, Planning Director: Vern Elliott, Fire Captain; Patience West, Senior Engineering Technician; Kami Griffin, Plan- ning Intern; and Fred Buss, Associate Planner. Discussion cen- tered around the minimum lot size requirements and the proposal of a road along the rear property line from Santa Ana Road. Staff indicated such a road would be required to meet City minimum spe- cifications as a public road since it would be serving five or more total lots. An agreement among all parties concerned with creation of the road would be necessary to ensure that the road is built to allow access off the rear of all created lots. ANALYSIS The applicants have proposed creation of a road across the rear of their parcel to allow access to the proposed rear (top) lots- from Santa Ana Road. Site topography makes access to the proposed near lots from San Fernando Road difficult, expensive and environmentally aesthetically unwise. Staff favors this approach and a number of other applicants with adjacent lot split proposals have agreed to pro- vide equal access easements and improvements along their rear property lines. An agreement has been signed by all the parties involved (at- tached) to build such a road. It should also be noted that a Lot Line Adjustment between this lot and adjacent Lot 12 has been tentatively approved and the Final Map is being processed through Staff. FINDINGS 1. The creation of four lots with a minimum lot size of 4. 20 acres on this parcel conforms to all applicable zoning and subdivision regulations and is consistent with the General Plan. 2. The creation of four lots in conformance with the recommended con- ditions of approval will not have a significant adverse effect upon the environment, and the preparation of an Environmental Im- pact Report is not necessary. 2 • • Tentative Parcel Map AT 4-83 (Frederick/Messer/Bethel) 3. Creation of a new road along the rear property line to serve lots created along the ridge of the hill is appropriate and will result in the negation of adverse environmental impacts associated with the extensive grading of long driveways from San Fernando Road. RECOMMENDATION Based upon the above Findings, the Planning Department recommends: A) Issuance of a Conditional Negative Declaration as follows: 1. Adequate provisions shall be made for drainage and erosion control and protection in conjunction with site and road development. 2. Adequate provision shall be made in the design of the private sewage disposal systems to minimize effects on natural water- courses. 3. Grading and tree removal shall be minimized during all phases of site development; and, B) Approval of Tentative Parcel Map AT 4-83 subject to the following conditions: 1. Private sewage disposal systems will be an acceptable method of sewage disposal if reports and designs are acceptable. All tests, reports and designs shall conform to methods and guidelines prescribed by the Manual of Septic Tank Practice and other applicable City ordinances. The following Note shall appear on the Final Map: "Appropriate soils reports including a percolation test, a test to determine the presence of ground water, and a log of a soil boring to a minimum depth of ten (10) feet shall be submitted to the Planning Department prior to the issuance of a building permit. Where soils reports indicate the conven- tional soil absorption systems are not acceptable, City ap- proval of plans for an alternative private sewage disposal system, designed by a Registered Civil Engineer , shall be re- quired. Depending upon the system, more restrictive require- ments may be imposed. " 2. Water shall be obtained from the Atascadero Mutual Water Com- pany and water lines shall exist at the frontage of all par- cels prior to filing of the Final Map. 3. All other available utilities not already in place shall be extended underground to each parcel frontage at the time of building permit. Any utility easements are to be shown on the Final Map. 3 Tentative Parcel Map AT 4-83 (Frederick/Messer/Bethel) 4. Efforts shall be made to minimize grading that would be dis- ruptive to the natural topography and removal of existing, mature trees. The following shall appear as a Note on the Final Map: "No trees shall be removed without compliance with applicable City ordinances. No grading shall commence without an appro- priate permit and compliance with applicable City ordinances. 5. Drainage and erosion control plans, prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer , shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Department prior to issuance of building permits in conjunction with installation of private driveways, ac- cess easements or buildings. 6. Roof materials for all structures shall be Class C rating or better and a Note to that effect shall appear on the Final Map. 7. Plan and profile drawings of proposed individual driveway(s) and driveway easements shall be submitted for approval by the Public Works and Planning Departments in order to determine average grade and appropriate improvement -requirements. If average slope exceeds 12%, paved improvement would be a re- quirement at the time of application for a building permit. Otherwise, an all-weather surface would be required similarly In no event will driveways be allowed which exceed 20% in slope. The driveway access shall be improved to a minimum width of twelve (12) feet and shall have a minimum unobstruc- ted vertical clearance of fourteen (14) feet. Notes to these effects shall appear on the Final Map. 8. All pipelines and other easements of record shall be shown on the Final Map. A letter shall be submitted from each utility company indicating the nature and extent of any building re- strictions. A Note stating any such restrictions shall appear on the Final Map. 9. Drainage swales shall be indicated on the Final Map and a Note shall appear on the Final Map which states: "Any modification of the ground during site development with- in fifty (50) feet of the drainage swales shall be subject to approval by the Planning and Public Works Departments. " 10. , A road shall be constructed across the full width of the southwestern property line (rear property line) to City standards including a minimum paved width of 20 feet with. three feet of graded shoulder on each side of the paving prior to recordation of the Final Map. a. Improvement drawings shall make provision for the exten- sion of utilities including electricity, gasd (if avail- able) , water and fire hydrants. 4 Tentative Parcel Map AT 4-83 (Frederick/Messer/Bethel) b. The applicant shall enter into an inspection agreement with the City for inspection of said improvements. C. Improvement drawings, including improvements to control grading and erosion within the road right-of-way, shall be submitted to the Public Works Department for review and approval. d. Fire hydrants of a type and size determined by the Plan- ning and Fire Departments shall be installed along the road in locations determined by the Fire Department. re. Offers of dedication, as necessary, to the public for road purposes for a full 40 feet shall be shown on the Final Map. Said offers shall be coordinated with and be contingent upon similar offers across Lots 20 and 12 of Block 26 which lead to the subject property from Santa Ana Road. Precise location of the road dedication shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning and Public Works Departments. Precise location of the road dedica- tion shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning and Public Works Departments. f. The applicant shall complete all improvements prior to acceptance of the Final Map or shall enter into an agreement with the Public Works Department to guarantee installation of improvements within one year of the date of recordation of the Final Map. A performance guaran- tee, bond, certificate of deposit, or similar arrange- ment shall be made in conjunction therewith. 11. The applicant shall request a road name for the proposed road which shall be shown on the Final Map and which shall comply with the following requirements: a. All road names shall be of Spanish origin or shall be the names of nonliving persons of historical importance. b. Road names shall not be duplicative of nor similar to other road names within the City of Atascadero or in the nearby unincorporated areas of San Luis Obispo County. 12. Lot Line Adjustment LA 830615 :1 (AT 83-179) for this appli- cant shall be recorded prior to recordation of this Final Map. 13. All conditions herein specified shall be complied with prior to filing of the Final Map. 14. A Final Map in compliance with all conditions set forth here- in shall be submitted for review and approval in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City Lot Division Ordi- nance prior to recordation. 5 • • Tentative Parcel Map AT 4-83 (Frederick/Messer/Bethel) a. Monuments shall be set at all new property corners cre- ated and a Registered Civil Engineer or licensed land surveyor shall submit a letter certifying that the monu- ments have been set prior to recordation of the Final Map. b. A recently updated preliminary title report shall be submitted for review in conjunction with the processing of the Final Map. 15. Approval of this Tentative Parcel Map shall expire two years from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted pursuant to a written request prior to the expira- tion date. ACTION The Planning Commission should, by motion, direct Staff as deemed appropriate. REPORT PREPARED BY: FRED BUSS Associate Planner REPORT APPROVED BY LAWRENCE STEVENS Planning Director Ps 6 DENNIS BETHEL & ASSOCIATES, INC. CIVIL ENGINEERS 122 West EI Camino, Suite-C • Santa Maria, California 93454 • (805)928-7666 September 6, 1983 DB-30137 City of Atascadero Administration Building Post Office Box 747 Atascadero, CA 93423 SUBJECT: Parcel Map AT-83-051 and AT-83-052 Dear Mr. Buss: Please find the enclosed executed agreement prepared for Mr. Dutra to facilitate our lot divisions. We further agree to give the necessary easements for construction of the subject roadway and are prepared to proceed immediately with grading and improvements to an all weather roadway. We would appreciate your scheduling of our projects to the Planning Commission at the grliest possible date. We have previously indicated we have the necessary 1 acc ss \to facilitate diva ion and have no intention of denying this access to future division . i Th nk yl for our assist ce in this matter. Sin erel, en s Bethe DB:jc Enclosure t • August 18 , 1983 Lawrence Stevens Planning Director City of Atascadero Atascadero, CA 93422 Dear Mr. Stevens : Pursuant to our discussion at the Subdivision Review Board on August -4 , 1983, this letter is to serve as a Letter of Agreement between the belo;•, signed prof 2_ty owners. All parties essentially agree as follows : 1) certain parcels can he created in the Long Valley area if road conditions are improved 2) specific parcels can be created and given better access if a new road is constructed generally in a southerly direction from Santa Ana Road 3) these parcels are in the tentative map phase 4) to continue processing of these maps in a timely fashion, it was agreed that the road did not have to be completed to complete the processing of the tentative parcel maps -5) each map approved by the city shall contain the condition that a full acceptable (to the City of Atascadero) road shall be built to serve the parcels, prior to filing of final map unless bond or quarantee is accepted by City. 7) this letter agreement may be signed as one or in counter parts. Bob Dutra Go don avis Reber K 11y W' liam 1Barn s Donal _ Messer e s Bethel �� `� i f 16 WV.41 VP 3a00 ° 14 Lor sass 19 /1;0100 lrgm rr 20 12 3 ass. 2 T 9 R 93SS r teas o 1 3,00 21 26 117C1� 10 . 22 Z$ I'�� lyssa 9 2 3 23 24 �j3c q&o5 T - ob 25 nom' tl�p� 2$ 24 n 4 320 o� 29 rim rto - 27 p (FH) 23 2$ oh �l3 a, 29 30 22 mos t tea, 12 �o� �p0°° 30 31 �+5s t 1 �d16° 31 gg60 _cps S Z Day cKi55 14 `0100 33 21 '0 ,0 50 1L4j zo �(}� 32 !ot Qy ` Lij op 10 tc cr • Y t' W' LL.I LLL- J aJ GI M cl- LLJ t . � �,keC��mevsCQ ac ZZup s { LLJ �L o .d' - qF 3.00.6FN 'P y 99 S99-3.00.6FN gj Ra .� i •II i ry in — / a� „l ? __: _ e- _ S =.j __• 9 _ •ts _ - &T!!G,�AGEND ITEM#� • M E M O R A N D U M TO: CITY MANAGER October 4 , 1983 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP AT 6-83 LOCATION: 3100 San Fernando Road (Lot 10 , Block 26) ', APPLICANT: Robert S. and Ida H. Dutra (Hohenstein) REQUEST: To allow division of 12. 79 acres into three parcels of 4. 24 , 4. 24 and 4 . 32 acres each. On October 3, 1983 , the Planning Commission conducted a public hear- ing on the subject matter unanimously (with Commissioner Sherer and Chairman Lilley absent) approving issuance of a Conditional Negative Declaration and approval of the three way land division request sub- ject to Conditions 1-15 as listed in the attached Staff Report. There was only brief discussion among the Commission concerning the application. Hank Hohensteion, representing the applicants, appeared and indicated his agreement with the Staff recommendation. No one else appeared on the matter. i LAWRENCE STEVENS MUPAAY L WARDEN Planning Director Ci y Ma ger • iris {,3� D a I CITY OF ATASCADERO \ � © Planning Department October 3 , 1983 STAFF REPORT - f SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP AT 6-83 LOCATION: 3100 San Fernando Road (Lot 10, Block 26) APPLICANT: Robert S. and Ida H. Dutra (Hohenstein) REQUEST: To allow division of 12. 79 acres into three parcels of 4. 24, 4. 24 and 4 .32 acres each. BACKGROUND 1. Existing Zoning: RS (Residential Suburban) 2. General Plan: Suburban Single Family Residential- 3. Environmental Determination: The applicant has completed an Ini- tial Study Environmental Description form. The Planning Director has prepared a draft Conditional Negative Declaration indicating the project will not have a significant adverse effect upon the environment if certain mitigation measures are incorporated into the project. 4. Site Conditions: The lot is divided by a large winter stream swale that cuts across the center of the lot. Slopes from the stream are gentle and flat toward the road and steep toward the rear lot line. Vegetation consists of natural grasses with trees and outcrops on the steep side. The lot is vacant and most of the surrounding properties are also vacant. 5. Project Description: The applicant requests permission to divide 12.79 acres into three parcels of 4 .24, 4 . 24 and 4 . 32 acres each. The proposed lot design would create two rectangular parcels with frontage on San Fernando Road and one nearby square parcel with frontage along a proposed new road located at the rear lot line. 6. Determination of Minimum Lot Size: Review of the five generalized performance criteria (Section 9-3.144) for this specific parcel establishes a minimum lot size as follows: Lot Size Factor Average slope (18.5%) . 75 Distance from center (10 - 12, 000) .30 Access (paved, < 15% slope) .40 Septic suitability (severe) 1. 50 General neighborhood character (6 . 45 acres) 1. 29 Required minimum lot size: 4.24 acres Tentative Parcel Map AT 6-83 (Dutra) The size of lot requested meets: the required minimum lot size. 7. Subdivision Review Board: On June 2, 1983 the Subdivision Review Board met with the applicant, Mr . Dutra, and his representative, Hank Hohenstein, to review the project. Members of the Board in attendance were: Larry McPherson, Public Works'; Director ; Shirley Summers, Planning Commissioner ; and Fred Buss, Associate Planner. Discussion centered around the following: a) minimum lot size requirements under the old and new zoning ordinance b) lot design to be in conformance with the Lot Division ordi- nance and General Plan c) access to the rear lot from a proposed road'; ANALYSIS The applicants have agreed to cooperate in the construction of a pro- posed new road along the spine of the hill that these lots back up to (see attached agreement) . The road would start from the bend of Santa Ana Road and cross through adjacent lots (Lots 20, 12 and 11) to this parcel. Staff recommends that this road be built': to serve the rear lots being created rather than attempt to put long driveways to the lots from San Fernando Road. The road would continue across the rear of this property to be able to connect to adjacent parcels further on. Staff is also recommending that this road be constructed to full size standards and dedicated to the City for public use since it will serve this entire area. The applicant's new lot design and size meet re- quirements of the zoning ordinance and General Plan.' FINDINGS 1. The creation of three lots with a minimum lot size of 4. 24 acres on this parcel conforms to all applicable zoning and subdivision regulations and is consistent with the General Plan. 2. The creation of three lots in conformance with the recommended conditions of approval will not have a significant adverse effect upon the environment and the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report is not necessary. 3. Creation of a new road along the rear property kine to serve lots. created along the ridge of the hill is appropriate and will result in the negation of adverse environmental impacts associated with the extensive grading of long driveways from San Fernando Road. 2 ar • Tentative Parcel Map AT 6-83 (Dutra) RECOMMENDATION Based upon the above ,Findings, the Planning Department recommends: A) Issuance of a Conditional Negative Declaration as follows: 1. Adequate provisions shall be made for drainage and erosion control and protection in conjunction with site and road development. 2. Adequate provision shall be made in the design of the private sewage disposal system to minimize effects on natural water courses. 3. Grading and tree removal shall be minimized during all phases of site development; and, B) Approval of Tentative Parcel Map AT 6-83 subject to the following conditions: 1. Private sewage disposal systems will be an acceptable method of sewage disposal if reports and designs are acceptable. All tests, reports and designs shall conform to methods and guidelines prescribed by the Manual of Septic Tank Practice and other applicable City ordinances. The following Note shall appear on the Final Map: "Appropriate soils reports including a percolation test, a test to determine the presence of ground water, and a log of a soil boring to a minimum depth of ten (10) feet shall be submitted to the Planning Department prior to the issuance of a building permit. Where soils reports indicate the conven- tional soil absorption systems are not acceptable, City ap- proval of plans for an alternative private sewage disposal system, designed by a Registered Civil Engineer , shall be re- quired. Depending upon the system, more restrictive require- ments may be imposed. " 2. Water shall be obtained from the Atascadero Mutual Water Com- pany and water lines shall exist at the frontage of all par- cels prior to filing of the Final Map. 3. All other available utilities not already in place shall be extended underground to each parcel frontage at the time of building permit. Any utility easements are to be shown on the Final Map. 4. Efforts shall be made to minimize grading that would be dis-. ruptive to the natural topography and removal of existing, mature trees. The following shall appear as a Note on the Final Map: 3 0 Tentative Parcel Map AT 6-83 (Dutra) "No trees shall be removed without compliance with applicable City ordinances. No grading shall commence without an appro- priate permit and compliance with applicable City ordinances. 5. Drainage and erosion control plans, prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer , shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Department prior to issuance of building permits _in conjunction with installation of private driveways, ac- cess easeents or buildings. 6. Roof materials for all structures shall be Class C rating or better and a Note to that effect shall appear on the Final Map. 7. Plan and profile drawings of proposed individual driveway(s) and driveway easements shall be submitted for approval by the Public Works and Planning Departments in order to determine average grade and appropriate improvement requirements. If average slope exceeds 12%, paved improvement would be a re- quirement at the time of application for a building permit. Otherwise, an all-weather surface would be required similarly In no event will driveways be allowed which exceed 20% in slope. The driveway access shall be impr-oved to a minimum width of twelve (12) feet and shall have a minimum unobstruc- ted vertical clearance of fourteen (14) feet. Notes to these effects shall appear on the Final Map. 8. All pipelines and other easements of record shall be shown on the Final Map. A letter shall be submitted from each utility company indicating the nature and extent of any building re- strictions. A Note stating any such restrictions shall appear on the Final Map. 9. Drainage swales shall be indicated on the Final Map and a Note shall appear on the Final Map which states: "Any modification of the ground during site development with- in fifty (50) feet of the drainage swales shall be subject to approval by the Planning and Public Works Departments. " 10. A road shall be constructed across the full width of the southwestern property line (rear property line) to City standards including a minimum paved width of 20 feet with three feet of graded shoulder on each side of the paving prior to recordation of the Final Map. a) Improvement drawings shall make provision for the exten- sion of utilities including electricity, gas (if avail- able) , water and fire hydrants. b) The applicant shall enter into an inspection agreement with the City for inspection of said improvements. 4 Tentative Parcel Map AT 6-83 (Dutra) c) Improvement drawings, including improvements to control grading and erosion within the road right-of-way, shall be submited to the Public Works Department for review and approval. d) Fire hydrants of a type and size determined by the Plan- ning and Fire Departments shall be installed along this road in locations determined by the Fire Department. e) Offers of dedication, as necessary, to the public for road purposes for a full 40 feet shall be shown on the Final Map. Said offers shall be coordinated with and be contingent on similar offers across Lots 20, 12 and 11 at Block 26 , which lead to the subject property from Santa Ana Road. Precise location of the road dedica- tions shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning and Public Works Departments. f) The applicant shall complete all improvements prior to acceptance of the Final Map or shall enter into an agreement with the Public Works Department to guarantee installation of improvements within one year of the date of recordation of the Final Map. A per.formance guaran- tee, bond, certificate of deposit, or similar arrange- ment shall be made in conjunction therewith. 11. The applicant shall request a road name for the proposed road which shall be shown on the Final Map and which shall comply with the following requirements: a) All road names shall be of Spanish origin or shall be the names of nonliving persons of historical importance. b) Road names shall not be duplicative of nor similar to other road names within the City of Atascadero or in the nearby unincorporated areas of San Luis Obispo County. 12. All conditions herein specified shall be complied with prior to filing of the Final Map. 13. A Final Map in compliance with all conditions set forth here- in shall be submitted for review and approval in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City Lot Division Ordi- nance prior to recordation. a. Monuments shall be set at all new property corners cre- ated and a Registered Civil Engineer or licensed land surveyor shall submit a letter certifying that the mon-, uments have been set prior to recordation of the Final Map. b. A recently updated preliminary title report shall be submitted for review in conjunction with the processing of the Final Map. 5 Tentative Parcel Map AT 6-83 (Dutra) 14. Approval of this Tentative Parcel Map shall expire two years from the date of final approval unless an: extension of time is granted pursuant to a written request prior to the expira- tion date. ACTION The Planning Commission should, by motion, direct Staff as deemed appropriate. REPORT PREPARED BY: �jyyd FRED USS Ass ciate Planner REPORT APPROVED BY: ld4relu_ LAWRENCE STEVENS Planning Director Ps 6 Wha .yyd0 t3 �OC�JT� N A,N.>7 ZdN�N� 18�.�` A� 4 0 55 21�� o , 14 T 1v f>'• • 13 Sa,v S?5S 19 2g00 rr 20 12 30�� s, 27 v R�P093SS r180� _ Q10 /7 21 . it 10 26 22 2 t160ci /1556 S 2523 24 3`3� - - _ - - 8 3180 os qG tt�ab 25 7 3� �� t� 00 26 1 2 4 n� 4 3�0 °sas roz°Z9 jjoc� 27 . 23 R S (FH) �o0 2$ oh A gf,0613 29 30 22 ggos q5`ti, �� 12 tom ,0b0° 30 60 31 . 31 6° lT'p '166 32 / a4h� t 14 �° `010° 33 21 10 C,000 to 8 �0 0� 20 t�(OID + S2 i L .bE`N aUZ * �Z� O�z 1Z CMi�mO WyQ'� D� C� O��m DNxt? p O r7-1 o`^�o y�m'� n � � '•a n Ln °ooh Y in a osii�' n r' 4 yW ttj O tnorn2 F •y nrAm \ o DoyD D p D co Pi D _ n O m z S A m 2 0 �Aomz Dn (n)00 f Croy I' j m °gym r 0,30 Cl70 n I v i > LK Aim � P v I v August 18, 1983 Lawrence Stevens Planning Director City of Atascadero Atascadero, CA 93422 Dear Mr. Stevens: Pursuant to our diSCUSSion at the Sub"-Vision Review Board on August 4, 1983, this letter is to serve as a Letter of Agreement between the below signed property owners. All parties essentially agree as follows : 1) certain parcels can be created in the Long Valley area if road conditions are improved 2) specific parcels can be created and given better access if a new road is constructed generally in a southerly direction from Santa Ana Road 3) these parcels are in the tentative map phase 4) to continue processing of these maps in a timely fashion, it was agreed that the road did not have to be completed to complete the processing of the tentative parcel maps 5) each map approved by the city shall contain the condition that a full acceptable (to the City of Atascadero) road shall be built to serve the parcels, prior to filing of final map unless bond or quarantee is accepted by City. 7) this letter agreement may be signed as one or in counter parts. Bob Dut Gordon T. Davis Robert Kelly William Barnes Donald Messer Dennis Bethel *T;n� AGENDA ED JTEP • MEMORANDUM TO: CITY MANAGER October 4 , 1983 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP AT 3-83 LOCATION: 3120 San Fernando Road (Lot 9 , Block 26) APPLICANT: Bob Kelley (Twin Cities Engineering) REQUEST: To divide 7 . 90 acres into two parcels of approximately 3. 5 and 4. 5 acres each, employing the minimum lot size reduc- tion adjustment. On October 3, 1983, the Planning Commission conducted a public hear- ing on the subject matter unanimously (with Commissioner Sherer and Chairman Lilley absent) approving issuance of a Conditional Negative Declaration, approval of the adjustment request, and approval of the land division request subject to Conditions 1-14 as set forth in the attached Staff Report. There was only brief discussion among the Commission concerning the application. Bob Kelley, applicant, appeared and noted his concurrence with the recommendation. No one else appeared on the matter . �Gu/il.►w" LAWRENCE STEVENSY L. ARDEN Planning Director Ci y Ma ger'; i • f I .,�9 CITY OF ATASCADERO • 197 \ �DO� Planning Department October 3 , 1983 STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP AT 3-83 LOCATION: 3120 San Fernando Road (Lot 9, Block 26) APPLICANT: Bob Kelley (Twin Cities Engineering) REQUEST: To divide 7.90 acres into two parcels of approximately 3. 5 and 4. 5 acres each, employing the minimum lot size reduc- tion adjustment. BACKGROUND 1. Existing Zoning: RS (Residential Suburban) 2. General Plan: Suburban Single Family Residential 3. Environmental Determination: An Initial Study Environmental De- scription form has been completed by the applicant. The Planning • Director has prepared a draft Conditional Negative Declaration indicating the project will not have a significant adverse effect upon the environment if certain mitigation measures are incorpora- ted into the project. 4. Site Conditions: The lot is divided by a winter stream swale that cuts across the center of the lot. The front half of the lot slopes gently down to the swale. The rear of the lot is a steep slope from the swale to the rear lot line. Vegetation consists of natural grasses with trees and rock outcrops on the steep side. This lot as well as most of the surrounding lots are vacant. 5. Project Description: The applicant requests permission to divide 7.90 acres into twoarcels of approximately 4. 5 and 3. 5 acres P PP Y each. The lots are to be divided such that one lot will have frontage on a proposed road along the rear property line. 6. Determination of Minimum Lot Size: Review of the five generalized performance criteria (Section 9-3.144) for this specific parcel establishes a minimum lot size as follows: Lot Size Factor Average slope (13.18%) . 75 Distance from center (10 - 12, 000) .30 Access (paved, -< 15% slope) .40 • Septic suitability (severe) 1. 50 General neighborhood character (6 .46 acres 1. 29 Required minimum lot size: 4 .24 acres 0 0 Tentative Parcel Map AT 3-83 (Kelley) Since this minimum lot size will not permit creation of two lots on 7.90 acres of land, the applicant has submitted additional required information for an Adjustment. An Adjustment, if granted, would permit up to a 20% reduction in the minimum lot size to 3. 39 acres allowing the applicant to create two parcels. 7. Subdivision Review Board: On August 4, 1983 the Subdivision Re- view Board met with the applicant, Bob Kelley, and his engineer, John Kennaly, to reviw this project. Members of the Board in attendance were: Larry Stevens, Planning Director ; Larry McPher- son, Public Works Director ; Mike Sherer, Planning Commissioner ; and Fred Buss, Associate Planner . Discussion centered around the requirements for an Adjustment and the proposed road construction and agreements. 8. Information for Adjustment to Minimum Lot Size: The proposed building sites will be situated close to each end of the parcel. A profile for driveway grades has not been submitted since the grades will be less than 5%. Parcel A has frontage on San Fernando Road. The building site (including the driveway) will require 1740 cubic yards of cut and 1740 cubic yards of fill on a 5% slope to create'; .a 14 ,400 square foot building pad area. The driveway is approximately 70 feet long with a 4% grade. The proposed leach field is 50 feet away from the pad and contains 1200 square feet of area on 5% slope. The 100% expansion area is located just beyond. The leach field expansion area would be approximately 280 feet away from the stream swale as proposed. Parcel B will have frontage on the proposed road: at the rear of the parcel. The building site (including the driveway) will re- quire 970 cubic yards of cut and 970 cubic yards of fill on a 4% slope to create a 12,000 square foot building pad area. The drive-way is approximately 30 feet long (to the proposed right-of- way) with a 4% grade. The proposed leach field is 40 feet away from the pad and contains 1200 square feet of area on 4% slope. The 100% expansion area is located just beyond. This leach field area would be approximately 600 feet away from the stream swale as proposed. ANALYSIS Before an Adjustment can be granted, Section 9-3. 144 (c) (2) requires that certain specified Findings be made by the Planning Commission. Since creation of two lots is dependent upon the Adjustment, Staff' s. review must consider each Finding. Review of the lot specific data submitted indicates a lot with basic- ally two grades. The demarcation line between these areas is the win- ter stream channel (swale) that bisects the property. The applicant has proposed splitting the lot along the swale creating one lot with frontage on San Fernando Road, and one with frontage' along the pro - 2 • Tentative Parcel Map AT 3-83 (Kelley) posed road at the top of the ridge (rear lot line) . Parcel A has an average slope of approximately 5%. Parcel B has slopes that range from 4% (building site) to 28% (toward the swale) . Each building site is proposed close to the frontage of each proposed lot. Each build- ing site contains an adequate area on 4% or less slope to accommodate a septic leach field, expansion area and the building pad. Staff' s only concern is the amount of grading being proposed for Par- cel A - the relatively level lot. Average slope for this lot is 5%. The proposal calls for 3480 cubic yards of earthwork (total cut plus total fill) . General Plan policies encourage preservation of trees, watersheds, natural slopes and other natural amenities from adverse and destruction resulting from poor design and development practices. Staff feels that creation of this much earthwork on this topography is unnecessary. The applicant has also proposed creation of a road across the rear of his parcel to allow access to the proposed rear lot from Santa Ana Road. Site topography makes access to the rear lot from San Fernando difficullt, expensive, and environmentally and aesthetically unwise. Staff favors this approach and a number of other applicants with ad- jacent lot split proposals have agreed to provide equal access ease- ments and improvements along their rear property lines. An agreement has been signed by all the parties involved, attached, to build such a road. FINDINGS 1. There are circumstances applicable to the property including shape, topography, location and surroundings which warrant use of specific site information rather than generalized are information in determining lot size. 2. The specific site information submitted clearly demonstrates that the adjustment in lot size is warranted. k 3. The granting of the adjustment will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons, be materially detrimental to the public welfare, or be injurious to nearby property or improvements 4. The granting of the adjustment will result in better utilization of the affected property. 5 . The granting of the adjustment is consistent with the General Plan. 6 . This project conforms to all applicable zoning and subdivision regulations. 7. Creation of a new road along the rear property line to serve lot s created along the ridge of the hill is appropriate and will result in the negation of adverse environmental impacts associated with the extensive grading of long driveways from San Fernando Road. 3 Tentative Parcel Map AT 3-83 (Kelley) RECOMMENDATION Based upon the above Findings, the Planning Department recommends: A) Issuance of a Conditional Negative Declaration as follows: 1. Adequate provisions shall be made for drainage and erosion control and protection in conjunction with site development and road development. 2. Adequate provision shall be made in the design of the private sewage disposal systems to minimize effects'; on natural water- courses. 3. Grading and tree removal shall be minimized`; during all phases of site development; and, B) Approval of Tentative Parcel Map AT 3-83, as submitted, subject to the following conditions: 1. Private sewage disposal systems will be an acceptable method of sewage disposal if reports and designs are acceptable. All tests, reports and designs shall conform to methods and guidelines prescribed by the Manual of Septic Tank Practice and other applicable City ordinances. The following Note shall appear on the Final Map: "Appropriate soils reports including a percolation test, a test to determine the presence of ground water, and a log of a soil boring to a minimum depth of ten (10) feet shall be submitted to the Planning Department prior to the issuance of a building permit. Where soils reports indicate the conven- tional soil absorption systems are not acceptable, City ap- proval of plans for an alternative privatesewage disposal system, designed by a Registered Civil Engineer , shall be re- quired. Depending upon the system, more restrictive require- ments may be imposed. " 2. Water shall be obtained from the Atascadero' Mutual Water Com- pany and water lines shall exist at the frontage of all par- cels prior to filing of the Final Map. 3. All other available utilities not already in place shall be extended underground to each parcel frontage at the time of building permit. Any utility easements are to be shown on the Final Map. 4. Efforts shall be made to minimize grading that would be dis- ruptive to the natural topography and removal of existing, mature trees. The following shall appear as a Note on the Final Map: 4 Tentative Parcel Map AT 3-83 (Kelley) "No trees shall be removed without compliance with applicable City ordinances. No grading shall commence without an appro- priate permit and compliance with applicable City ordinances. 5. Drainage and erosion control plans, prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer , shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Department prior to issuance of building permits in conjunction with installation of private driveways, ac- cess easeents or buildings. 6. Roof materials for all structures shall be Class C rating or better and a Note to that effect shall appear on the Final Map. 7. Plan and profile drawings of proposed individual driveway(s) and driveway easements shall be submitted for approval by the Public Works and Planning Departments in order to determine average grade and appropriate improvement requirements. If average slope exceeds 12%, paved improvement would be a re- quirement at the time of application for a building permit. Otherwise, an all-weather surface would be required similarly In no event will driveways be allowed which exceed 20% in slope. The driveway access shall be improved to a minimum width of twelve (12) feet and shall have a minimum unobstruc- ted vertical clearance of fourteen (14) feet. Notes to these effects shall appear on the Final Map. 8. All pipelines and other easements of record shall be shown on the Final Map. A letter shall be submitted from each utility company indicating the nature and extent of any building re- strictions. A Note stating any such restrictions shall appear on the Final Map. 9. Drainage swales shall be indicated on the Final Map and a Note shall appear on the Final Map which states: "Any modification of the ground during site development with- in fifty (50) feet of the drainage swales shall be subject to approval by the Planning and Public Works Departments. " 10. A road shall be constructed across the full width of the southwestern property line (rear property line) to City standards including a minimum paved width of 20 feet with three feet of graded shoulder on each side of the paving prior to recordation of the Final Map. a) Improvement drawings shall make provision for the exten- sion of utilities including electricity, gas (if avail-, able) , water and fire hydrants. b) The applicant shall enter into an inspection agreement with the City for inspection of said improvements. 5 • 0 Tentative Parcel Map AT 3-83 (Kelley) c) Improvement drawings, including improvements to control grading and erosion within the road right-of-way, shall be submited to the Public Works Department for review and approval. d) Fire hydrants of a type and size determined by the Plan- ning and Fire Departments shall be installed along this road in locations determined by the Fire Department. e) Offers of dedication, as necessary, to the public for road purposes for a full 40 feet shall be shown on the Final Map. Said offers shall be coordinated with and be contingent upon similar offers across Lots 20 , 12, 11 and 10 of Block 26, which lead to the subject property from Santa Ana Road. Precise location of the road ded- ication shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning and Public Works Departments. f) The applicant shall complete all improvements prior to acceptance of the Final Map or shall enter into an agreement with the Public Works Department to guarantee installation of improvements within; one year of the date of recordation of the Final Map'.. A performance guarantee, bond, certificate of deposit, or similar arrangement shall be made in conjunction therewith. 11. The applicant shall request a road name for the proposed road which shall be shown on the Final Map and which shall comply with the following requirements : a) All road names shall be of Spanish origin or shall be the names of nonliving persons of historical importance. b) Road names shall not be duplicative of nor similar to other road names within the City of Atascadero or in the nearby unincorporated areas of San Luis Obispo County. 12. All conditions herein specified shall be complied with prior to filing of the Final Map. 13. A Final Map in compliance with all conditions set forth here- in shall be submitted for review and approval in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City Lot Division Ordi- nance prior to recordation. a. Monuments shall be set at all new property corners cre- ated and a Registered Civil Engineer or licensed land surveyor shall submit a letter certifying that the mon- uments have been set prior to recordation of the Final Map. b. A recently updated preliminary title report shall be submitted for review in conjunction with the processing of the Final Map. 6 0 • Tentative Parcel Map AT 3-83 (Kelley) 14 . Approval pp oval of this Tentative Parcel Map . shall expire two years from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted pursuant to a written request prior to the expira- tion date. ACTION The Planning Commission should, by motion, direct Staff as deemed appropriate. REPORT PREPARED BY : USS Planner REPORT APPROVED BY: LAWRENCE STEVENS Planning Director Ps 7 . r r , o ; i8 LvG477PAt fhvD oNWC - lit 13 ati �9 2aoo !! 20 i 2 30 = 17'F PO � neob o 1 R Sass _ i 3140 26 21 - 117cr) (0 22 - DC' C 3 tt 23 2 323 24 3t3� QooS _ 7 Ob 25 26 l 24 l`iBas oZo 4 23 Ito05 !' 27. p c } 23 R S ( H)C o0 28 oh 9go513 �ti o5 100-1029 30 22 p mos 1y9� 12 tom �ptbo° 30 �g 11 `�60 3 i 31 5 32 �46o `�29 14 l°�h� ;tp0 �0 33 ° to t0 201� .r.. 12 1 p100 ' Ld m w V U N\ tu 1W+ N�eV O tio�o�o�o � � v h�oti 3. S _ IY _ 4 C .92 62,9/ 1 / / / 3..L 0.62.6E N / LI r I �.00. Nl RF� 4 -' 70Al, Jv, / r yi Al + � Vi \-e. I / 4 t / .1011i S,�P�'�EmEN';�9-L .LNFo��IlCtil �� CEJ /41. ti. L, �uPG�Em�ivr�ac r14A —43 ZoT`l, ,Bj d-4, August 18 , 1983 Lawrence Stevens Planning Director City of Atascadero Atascadero, CA 93422 Dear Mr. Stevens : Pursuant to our discussion at the Subdivision Review Board on August 4, 1983, this letter is to serve as a Letter of Agreement between the below signed property owners. All parties essentially agree as follows : 1) certain parcels can be created in the Long Valley area if road conditions are improved 2) specific parcels can be created and given better access ifrl a new road is constructed generally in a southerly direction from Santa Ana Road 3) these parcels are in the tentative map phase 4) to continue processing of these maps in a timely fashion, it was agreed that the road did not have to be completed to complete the processing of the tentative parcel maps 5) each map approved by the city shall contain the condition that a full acceptable (to the City of Atascadero) road shall be built to serve the parcels, prior to filing of final map unless bond or quarantee is accepted by City. 7) this letter agreement may be signed as one or in counter parts. Bob Dutra Gordon T. Davis ' Robert Kelly William Barnes Donald Messer Dennis Bethel M TIN G AGENDA a 3ITEM #_ 4q MEMORANDUM TO: CITY MANAGER October 4 , 1983 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP AT 10-83 LOCATION: 10725 Vista Road (Lot 39 , Block 40) APPLICANT: Larry Cote (Twin Cities Engineering) REQUEST: To allow division of 9.66 acres of land into two parcels of 6. 4 and 3. 3 acres each. On October 3 , 1983, the Planning Commission conducted a public hear- ing on the subject matter unanimously (with Commissioner Sherer and Chairman Lilley absent) approving issuance of a Conditional Negative Declaration and approval of the Parcel Map subject to Conditions 1-15 • as set forth in the attached Staff Report. However , it was noted that the 3. 3 acre parcel would need to be revised to reflect a lot size of 3. 75 acres or more due to the criteria applied in determining the minimum lot size. There was only brief discussion among the Commission concerning the application. Allen Campbell, representing the applicant, spoke in support of ap- proving the application and noted that the paving of San Marcos and Los Altos Roads is nearly completed. No one else appeared on the matter. LAWRENCE STEVENS MUWY Yager WARDEN Planning Director City Ma Ps • a ��� a sir. I CITY OF ATASCADERO r 1918 � ' 19 9 i Planning Department October 3 , 1983 STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP AT 10-83 LOCATION: 10725 Vista Road (Lot 39, Block 40) APPLICANT: Larry Cote (Twin Cities Engineering) I- - REQUEST: To allow division of 9. 66 acres of land into two parcels of 6. 4 and 3.3 acres each. BACKGROUND 1. Existing Zoning: RS (Residential Suburban) 2. General Plan: Suburban Single Family Residential 3. Environmental Determination: An Initial Study Environmental De- • scription form has been completed by the applicant. The Planning Director has prepared a draft Conditional Negative Declaration indicating the project will not have a significant adverse effect upon the environment if certain mitigation measures are incorpora- ted into the project. 4. Site Conditions: This parcel is located on Vista Road, a short dead-end street in the 3-F Meadows area. The lot is generally rectangularly shaped though somewhat narrowed at the street frontage end. The lot depth runs greater than 1300 feet from the street. A large swale runs through the middle of the lot on a diagonal (northwest/southeast) . The lot slopes down and away from the street. Vegetation is composed mostly of natural grasses and shrubs. The surrounding parcels are generally vacant with single family homes being constructed in the general area. 5. Project Description: The applicant requests permission to divide 9 .66 acres of land into two parcels of approximately 3. 3 and 6 .4 acres each. The proposed lot design would create two parcels divided by a diagonal line. The front lot (3. 3 acres) would have access from Vista Road. The rear parcel (6 . 4 acres) has a pro- posed 25 foot wide access easement from Realito Road. 6. Determination of Minimum Lot Size: Review of the five generalized performance criteria (Section 9-3.144) for this specific parcel establishes a minimum lot size as follows: • i 0 Tentative Parcel Map AT 10-83 (Cote) Lot Size Factor Average slope (14.93%) .75 Distance from center (12 - 14 ,000) .40 Access (paved, < 15% slope) .40 Septic suitability (severe) 1. 50 General neighborhood character (3. 5 acres) . 70 Required minimum lot size: 3. 75 acres The applicant has proposed one lot at 3.3 acres and the other at 6.4 acres. A minimum lot size of 3.75 acres requires at least 7. 50 acres of land to create two lots, which the applicant has. 7. Subdivision Review Board: On September 1, 1983 the Subdivision Review Board met with the applicant' s representative, Linda Roach. Members of the Board in attendance were: Larry McPherson, Public Works Director ; Mike McCain, Fire Captain; Michele Reynolds, Assistant Civil Engineer; Shirley Moore, Planning Commissioner; and Fred Buss, Associate Planner . Discussion centered around ad- justing the lot design to coincide with the minimum lot size and possible fire hydrant upgrade. ANALYSIS Staff review indicates that this lot has the necessary acreage to cre- ate two lots at the required minimum lot size. However , the lot de- sign will need to be reconfigured to accomplish this. The existing access easement can remain as it is and the diagonal line can be squared off to add the additional half acre to the front parcel (Par- cel A) . FINDINGS 1. The creation of two lots with a minimum lot size of 3. 75 acres on this parcel conforms with all applicable zoning and subdivision regulations and is consistent with the General Plan. 2. The creation of two lots in conformance with the recommended con- ditions of approval will not have a significant adverse effect upon the environment and the preparation of an Environmental Im- pact Report is not necessary. RECOMMENDATION Based upon the above Findings, the Planning Department recommends: A) Issuance of a Conditional Negative Declaration as follows: 2 0 Tentative Parcel Map•AT 10-83 (Cote) 1. Adequate provisions shall be made for drainage and erosion control and protection in conjunction with site and road (easement) development. 2. Adequate provision shall be made in the design of the private sewage disposal systems to minimize effects on natural water- courses. 3. Grading and tree removal shall be minimized during all phases of site development; and, B) Approval of Tentative Parcel Map AT 10-83 subject to the following conditions: 1. The Final Map shall be revised to allow a maximum of two lots with neither lot to be smaller than 3.75 acres. 2. Private sewage disposal systems will be an acceptable method of sewage disposal if reports and designs are acceptable. All tests, reports and designs shall conform to methods and guidelines prescribed by the Manual of Septic Tank Practice and other applicable City ordinances. The following Note shall appear on the Final Map: "Appropriate soils reports including a percolation test, a test to determine the presence of ground water, and a log of a soil boring to a minimum depth of ten (10) feet shall be submitted to the Planning Department prior to the issuance of a building permit. Where soils reports indicate the conven- tional soil absorption systems are not acceptable, City ap- proval of plans for an alternative private sewage disposal system, designed by a Registered Civil Engineer , shall be re- quired. Depending upon the system, more restrictive require- ments may be imposed. " 3. Water shall be obtained from the Atascadero Mutual Water Com- pany and water lines shall exist at the frontage of all par- cels prior to filing of the Final Map. 4. All other available utilities not already in place shall be extended underground to each parcel frontage at the time of building permit. Any utility easements are to be shown on the Final Map. 5. Efforts shall be made to minimize grading that would be dis- ruptive to the natural topography and removal of existing, mature trees. The following shall appear as a Note on the Final Map: "No trees shall be removed without compliance with applicable City ordinances. No grading shall commence without an appro- priate permit and compliance with applicable City ordinances. 3 Tentative Parcel Map AT 10-83 (Cote) 6. Drainage and erosion control plans, prepared by a Registered 0 Civil Engineer , shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Department prior to issuance of building permits in conjunction with installation of private driveways, ac- cess easements or buildings. 7. Roof materials for all structures shall be Class C rating or better and a Note to that effect shall appear on the Final Map. 8. The existing fire hydrant nearest the property shall be up- graded from a wharfhead to a steamer if required by the Fire Chief after a review of hydrant standards with the Planning Director. 9. Plan and profile drawings of proposed individual driveway (s) and driveway easements shall be submitted for approval by the Public Works and Planning Departments in order to determine average grade and appropriate improvement; requirements. If average slope exceeds 12%, paved improvement would be a re- quirement at the time of application for a building permit. Otherwise, an all-weather surface would be 'required similarly In no event will driveways be allowed which exceed 20% in slope. The driveway access shall be improved to a minimum width of twelve (12) feet and shall have a minimum unobstruc- ted vertical clearance of fourteen (14) feet. Notes to these effects shall appear on the Final Map. 10 . All pipelines and other easements of record, shall be shown on the Final Map. A letter shall be submitted from each utility company indicating the nature and extent of, any building re- strictions. A Note stating any such restrictions shall appear on the Final Map. 11. Drainage swales shall be indicated on the Final Map and a Note shall appear on the Final Map which states: "Any modification of the ground during site development with- in fifty (50) feet of the drainage swales shall be subject to approval by the Planning and Public Works Departments. " 12. All conditions herein specified shall be complied with prior to filing of the Final Map. 13. This Final Map shall not be recorded until San Marcos/Los Altos Roads have been fully improved to Highway 41. 14 . A Final Map in compliance with all conditions set forth here- in shall be submitted for review and approval in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City Lot Division Ordi- nance prior to recordation. 4 Tentative Parcel Map AT 10-83 (Cote) a. Monuments shall be set at all new property corners cre- ated and a Registered Civil Engineer or licensed land surveyor shall submit a letter certifying that the mon- uments have been set prior to recordation of the Final Map. b. A recently updated preliminary title report shall be submitted for review in conjunction with the processing of the Final Map. 15 . Approval of this Tentative Parcel Map shall expire two years from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted pursuant to a written request prior to the expira- tion date. ACTION The Planning Commission should, by motion, direct Staff as deemed appropriate. REPORT PREPARED BY• F BUSS A ociate Planner REPORT APPROVED BY: /Mvv'� LAWRENCE STEVENS Planning Director Ps 5 fY� 16 6 f z { (ofo 17 ! tt 22 23 24 pP� i 21 �CR771)N fI40 44 �% 4 r , Arlo .6?3 S N N N N 1013 725- 111 / F o CL -< i o a sQs 10 !8 ►9 1 t* 12 1 � J 20 auoo 4� 4 12 A Q_ 19 33 13 ?: 3 /OG35 17 /06 34 14 /OGS ,S IS I6 �OGys 15 A o 35 G �o /oG e5 �o z 6 44 �064h h GS$ 3 43 38 37 36 /0720 „ 9 45 42A 1 /0735 ion io�55 r}=x< 4 �p 0745 A _ 42 A 40 q/�`A .11 SS 10T 80 1 41 g 25 3 IOBOS .0-�: - � � 10850 loess PD 2 2 i z � 1 CID `, tt •Ar�t�7st�la4ir� \��'1�'"�,T� 1',�Y+' 'y 1 ` 5 040 . �Tt�w .j4iiaa mri1a +oo .'Aip+elltfens:li.xy -�f',3s a,*ae3a•et Swnty-.ttvf hy4Y'�:. -+�� /q� 46 --?I1{3""F'S !K aqt L�at`}tmaUtul4.'t hs YyC2xL=Va. ba NAaKt: OS 47 CIO, a 040 i r l ` V a ! -Palo' Ilk J Ja Tti ��NI Z4 Do /OL OZ93.17EM# �2/0 • M E M O R A N D U M TO: CITY COUNCIL October 4 , 1983 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: Acceptance of PARCEL MAP AT 820401:1 LOCATION: 10320 Atascadero Road (Lot 2, Block 33) APPLICANT: Barry E. and Sandra Clarke (Morgan) On June 28, 1982, the City Council approved Parcel Map AT 820401:1, subject to certain conditions and in concurrence with the recommenda- ation of the Planning Commission. The zoning is RS and the General Plan designation is Suburban Single • Family Residential. Staff review has determined that all conditions of approval have been met. On October 3 , 1983 , the ' Planning Commis- sion reviewed the Parcel Map on its Consent Calendar and recommended final acceptance. LAWRENCE STEVENSMU Y L WARDEN Planning Director Ci y Ma ger Ps • 1 Iw),cs' GZ .1 00 l[ o� q4 czD WA Ei � t a °c ° m a ;.n _- a O - aDm aao CD - f�),LZ'9JG a)3pp .IBN O .tv � 3e O C)Ca p -Po Aa C. o 3 c • 10 $ o o�oo -- � nn ' Y o p'D n a to X00 rp � �� �`•'_ - '3 A oo,Li W L t W W / W O Do Q` i AGENDA WTE' is io B`3 ITEM# t1 • _M_E_M O_R_A N_D_U_M_ TO: City Manager r FROM: Public Works Director SUBJECT: Asphalt Concrete Overlay - Bid No. 83-08 DATE: October 4 , 1983 It is recommended Council award Bid No. 83-08 - 1983/84 As- phalt Concrete Overlay Project to A. J. Diani Construction Co. , Inc. , 295 North Blosser Road, Santa Maria, Ca. , 93456 . Total bid for the project, which also includes three maintenance assessment districts is $346,081. 50 . The Engineer ' s Estimate for this pro- ject was $328, 630 for the overlays and $17, 645 for the mainten- ance districts for a total of $346 ,275 . A tabulation of the bids received is attached to this memo. The second low bid, submitted by C. J. Limata of Clovis had an error in the bid extensions and it is recommended that this bid be disallowed due to that error . It was not possible, by • examination, to determine where the error occurred;. Funds for the overlay project are budgeted in a combination of gas tax, TDA, and STA funds in the amount of $332, 000 , while the maintenance assessment districts will be funded using contin- gency reserves until the proceeds of the assessments are re- ceived. The estimated project amount for the maintenance assess- ment districts is $14 , 000 . RENCE MC PHERSON LM:ad c: Finance Director N �. . C U •� a) •--� r n Cll O a P4 c � a Q) o o Ln o Ln U U Lr) O l0 O N d—i O L 00 0 1� N O N M M In O Z] 1p Q0 M 00 M Ln d• O M M M M M N U L a. 4 c totem 4—J LL •r•y N ^^ 4d C (L r Q Q E:: C?� o =D CL- U � F•--1 J W O OD 00 00 00 00 0 0 0 0 0 1 I I O M (1) M M M O 00 00 00 00 00 CL O O O O O z z z z z U to to rd b rd U) -I r I r•1 •r-1 Q N Pel W W W P� M OD 00 1 O M I1 O x M O In U 00 �4_.. N r I .I-1 U S4. fri 4-) r L- •� � a v 6 o -0 ro 4 x r-I Q. h h O w h n s4 as o cn ro >. N O > C O r-+ CN a a- W O O U O +-) L a� U U a CN a) CN O r- L- 4-J r- a� a. c ® LL, {J cG *s< vJPQ L CD J O O C M O co .. I CL O z U 10 Cn rA N W Q 00 oc M M N 1 Q) � U .. L U) O 'D (D f] z a) C Q Zy _0 a) n .-. Q W O Rt._! M AG_�NDA D�..�.� io o $J ITEM?� • _M E_M_O_R A_N_D_U_M �- TO. City Manager iG!� FROM: Public Works Director SUBJECT: Caltrans Projects - 1984/89 LJ DATE: October 4, 1983 Attached for Council' s information and review is a listing of future proposed Caltrans highway projects. Attachment A is the listing as proposed by Caltrans and Attachment B is the list- ing recently approved by the Area Council at their meeting of May 17, 1983. No further action is reuqired unless Council wishes to make any comments or revisions to the lists. These projects are like- ly to be constructed during the next five years. I LAWRENCE MC PHERSON LM:ad att. • San Luis Obito County and Aties Arroyo Grande Atascadero Grover City Morro Bay Area Planning and Coordinating Council Paso Robles Pismo6 San Luis Obi MEW San Luis Obispo County September 27, 1983 or• •" r� �s Murray Warden, City Manager SEP 2 9 193 City of Atascadero P. 0. Box 747 Atascadero, CA. 93422 Dear Mr. Warden: SUBJECT: REVIEW OF CALTRANS LIST OF CANDIDATE HIGHWAY PROJECTS FOR SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY DURING FISCAL YEAR 1984/1989 Caltrans has prepared a list of state highway projects which may be included in the 1984 STIP. These projects have been developed to varying degrees over the past decade by Caltrans staff. As part of the new Caltrans administrations attempt to involve local jurisdictions in decision-making, a candidate list of highway projects was given to the Area Council staff on July 10, 1983 for staff review. This was the first time this list was made available to any local agency for review. The list consisted of projects which Caltrans at sometime in the past had done some work on. The project on this list may or may not have true merit. The Area Council at their September 8, 1983 meeting directed staff to provide a copy of the list to all member citizens for their comment. The Area Council further directed staff to make each entity aware that Caltrans staff is available to discuss any or all of the projects identified on the attached list. In addition, the Area Council directed their staff to provide each city and the county with a list of the regional candidate highway projects which were adopted by the Area Council on May 17, 1983. The purpose of this list of regional candidates projects is to allow cities and the county through the Area Council, to identify tentative state highway projects to be included for funding in the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). Your agencies is regquested to suggest any additional changes in the priority of the existing list. If there are any questions about either of these lists or if you need any further information please don't hesitate to contract our office at (805) 549-5710. Sincerely, PAUL C. CRAWFORD Exec tive Secretary Z VICTOR MIH /C/ Transportation Planner County Qqm- ent Center, San Luis Obispo, Ca. 93408, (805) 549-5710 1 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY AND CITIES AREA PLANNING AND COORDINATING COUNCIL STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE : SEPTEMBER 8, 1983 SUBJECT: REVIEW OF. CALTRANS LIST OF CANDIDATE PROJECT LIST FOR NEW HIGHWAY PROJECTS IN SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY ISSUE Caltrans requested the Area Council to perform a staff review of a list of "Candidate" projects for possible inclusion in the 1984 State transportation Improvement Program (STIP) . Area Council staff contacted.the city and county engineers within the region, and prepared tentative comments on the desirability of the individual "candidate" projects, which was transmitted to Caltrans. Staff is requesting Area Council confirmation of these comments. i RECOMMENDATION Staff: Approve staff comments regarding .the Caltrans "candidate" list as shown on the attached table (Attachment "A") . CTAC: No comment TTAC: Concur with staff recommendation`s BACKGROUND Caltrans has a candidates list of possible projects which are suitable for inclusion into the 1984 STIP. These projects have been developed by Caltrans staff over the past decade. As part of the new Caltrans administration's attempts to involve local jurisdictions in decision- making, the candidates list was given to the Area Council staff immediately after the July 7, 1983, meeting of the Area Council for comment and circulation among the local engineering departments. Although this was the first time that the list was made available for local agency review, the amount of time allowed for reviewing the list was limited to one week. In spite of this constraint, all of the city engineers were contacted, and their comments on the projects in their area noted. No comments were received from the county since insufficient time was available to present the list to the county Board of Supervisors, as required by department policy. The list of comments was transmitted to Caltrans, noting they were subject to confirmation at the next Area Council Meeting. According to Caltrans staff, there will be a much longer review period next year for the Candidates listing with the opportunity to take the list through the full formal Area Council review process. Finally, the Area Council staff requested Caltrans to include in their review of state highway projects the list adopted by the Area Council on May 17, 1983. This "Regional Condidate Project List" is included as Attachment B. drt ATTACHIENT A 0 CALTRANS MAJOR PROJECTS CURRENTLY IN FILES (FOR SLO COUNTY) Highway 1 from l mile south to 5 miles north of 88,000 R/W Callender — .Black Lake Road 1,040,000 Const curve improvements 1,128,000 Total Highway 1 at Pismo Creek Bridge R/W widen the existing 405,000 Const bridge 24 feet 405,000 Total Highway 1 Frontage road from Price Street R/W South Bound Highway 101 off ramp to 110,000 Const route 101 adding 2 way turn lane _ 110,000 Total Highway 1 near Harmony 230,000 R/W construction of safety roadside 2,240,000 Const reststop 2,470,000 Total Highway 33 from junction with Highway 166 to Kern R/W County line 2603,000 Const Reconstruct 2 lane road 260,000 Total Highway 41 from .4 mile east to 7.2 mile east of R/W junction of Highways 41 and 1 735,000 Const Reconstruct 2 lane highway 735,000 Total Highway 41 from Highway 101 to .6 mile east 522,000 R/W' of Salinas River 8,320,000 Const Build conventional highway on new alignment 8,842,000 Total Highway 46 at a point 7.0 miles east of R/W route 1 to construct a 85,000 Const vista point 85,000 Total Highway 46 from Route 101 to Airport Road R/W in Paso Robles to revise the interchange 5,000,000 Const and add two lane 5,000,000 Total Highway 101 at Nipomo 584,000 R/W construction of a safety 4,870,000 Const raodside reststop 5,454,000 Total Highway 101 southbound on ramp at 50,000 R/W Traffic Way 2,150,000 Const revise on ramp 2,200,000 Total Highway 101 from .5 mile south of to .2 mile R/W north of Los Osos Road overcrossing 336,000 Const highway landscaping work 336,000 Total Highway 101 from Marsh Street separation R/W to Buena Vista Overcrossing in SLO 289,000 Co zt Automate the existing irrigation system 289,000 To Highway 101 from .2 mile south of Steinner Creek R/W to Stenner Creek 275,000 Const Construct sound barrier wall 275,000 Total Highway 101 from .3 mile south of San Anselmo R/W road overcrossing to Vineyard Drive Overcrossing. 445,000 Const Roadway reconstruction of South Bound lanes 445,000 Total Highway 101 from South Paso Robles Overhead to North R/W Paso Robles overhead 35,000 Const Highway planting 35,000 Total Highway 166 from .2 mile west of Gifford Drive to .4 R/W mile west of Cuyama River Bridge 1,250,000 Const reconstruct the roadway 1,250,000 Total Highway 166 from .1 mile west of to 10.5 miles east R/W of Gifford Creek Bridge 1,130,000 Const add shoulders to existing roadway 1,130,000 Total mc6/721k 4 ATTACMENT B -SLO AREA COUNCIL CANDIDATE STIP PROJECT LIST The Area Council has adopted on May 17, 1983 the following list of projects of regional concern, for inclusion in the 1984 STIP. The list is as follows (in proposed priority order): la. Widen Highway 46 bridge over the Salinas River. Paso Robles Note: included in 1983 STIP lb. Geometric modifications and signalization of the Highway 101/46 interchange. Paso Robles Note: included in 1983 STIP 2. Improve alignment, widen lanes, add passing lanes on Highway 41 from the county line to Cholame. County Note: included in the 1983 STIP 3. Construct drainage improvements on Atascadero Highway 41 between Lake Park and Highway 101 Atascadero. 4. Construct new route Highway 41 from Highway 101 to east of Salinas River. Atascadero Note: included on CTC list of projects of "Special Interest 5a. Modify the on-and off-ramp system from Marsh to Monterey Streets, especially San Luis Obispo the Highway 101/1 interchange. City 5b. Add merging lanes at Madonna Road and San ;Luis Obispo Marsh Street (northbound 101). City Note: included in 1983 STIP 6. Revise southbound on-ramp of Highway 101 at Traffic Way, possibly by replacement with a new ramp at Fair Oaks. Arroyo Grande Note: included on CTC list of projects of "Special Interest" 7. Signalize and channelize Highway 101/ 227 interchange. Arroyo Grande 8. Construct a new interchange at Willow Road. Nipomo/County 9. Revise the northbound off-ramp from Highway 101 to Highway 41. Atascadero 10. Traffic signal at Highway 1 at Ardath. (Ultimately a grade separation is recommended). Cambria/County i11. Signalize the Oak Park/Highway 101 interchange. Arroyo Grande 12. Construct new on- and off-ramps in Pismo Beach from Price Canyon to the south city limits. Pismo Beach 13. Widen Highway 46 from the Salinas River to Kern County line, or add more passing lanes. County 14. Realign and reconstruct Highway 1 from Willow Road to Valley Road. County 15. Traffic signal on Highway 1 at Yerba Buena. Morro Bay 16. Traffic signal on Highway 1 at Windsor. Cambria/County 17. Revise alignment, widen pavement (lane widths) on Highway 227 between Printz Road (especially widen bridge at Corbett Canyon) . County F SAM Mlcu ...' ct'1�co - Y •' __ •,^.. 'aur ' +.+..� Mo / 1 ,Y „'4<.........,,.•. � ,✓ i T� ♦ � PASO RO CA CAYU .. �: 41 •..._ tl G �1%•w..•c•l v y'Swr4 1. Regional Canidates Listing MORR _� _~I .'c..r rw •'`fin., � C—T • Los LEGENDIN B Bridge work ~o ~ ' : IAIfM MM3 fw S Signalization work R Road worK ,:f•� SAN MIGU(E «.......r CI CHOIAME��� y PASO ROBLES '_ at s..•--�_ '4 --�.%l IEM/IEiON ` " SCADERO Sa 41 • 2 , J, 7NTA ter' ilk { �� / \` ^,•I MARC ARITA ��• _ ^ to roto �: SAN LUIS 0BISPO Regional Canidates Listing i. i .(! f• -or�w...;~�,~, !jc`, , ^- f tel` \ _ - \ {NEIL �[1 •`'Y 'E _ ...o.r > Df AC,4 J 1 • R •4��• •�� •S r i�1 t_`/ • • r}Es •-fin. SEAC yo c. c rt I' ,F.- A. R _. . ,E �,iw d 10 � ti�AA ,fi 1 LAW OFFICES OF CLARKSON & BOATMAN FSSE • 2 1042 PACIFIC STREET, SUITE 0 3 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA 93401 19$3(805) 543-4897 -4 Attorneys for Claimant — — - — 5 6 7 8 In the Matter of the Claim of 9 ) CLAIM FOR PERSONAL EDWARD LAFFERTY, ) INJURIES 10 ) (Government Code §910) Claimant, ) VS. ) 12 ) CITY OF ATASCADERO, ) 13 ) 14 TO THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO: 15 You are hereby notified that Edward Lafferty, whose 16 address is P.O. Box 69 , Avila Beach, CA. 93424 , claims 17 damages from the County of San Luis Obispo in an amount 18 computed as of the date of presentation of this claim of 19 $100 , 000 . 00. 20 This claim is based on personal injuries sustained by 21 claimant on or about June 19 , 1983 , at the San Luis Obispo 22 County Jail, under the following circumstances : 23 On or about June 19 , 1983 , claimant was arrested by two 24 City of Atascadero police officers purporting to be Officers 25 Evans (#1084) and Rodgers (,4045) , on a charge of violating 26 Penal Code §647 (f) . Claimant was then transported to the • 27 San Luis Obispo County Jail, where , during the booking 28 s 1 process, Claimant was subject to the use of excessive force 2 by the above mentioned Atascadero Police Officers and • 3 several San Luis Obispo_ County Sheriff' s deputies, whose 4 exact identities are unknown to Claimant at this time. Said 5 use of excessive force resulted in Claimant' s jaw being 6 broken. 7 Claimant alleges that any or all of the acts or 8 omissions by the County of San Luis Obispo and/or the City 9 of Atascadero, their agents or employees , as set forth 10 herein, constituted a reasonably forseeable risk of injury 11 to Claimant, and further that the acts or omissions set 12 forth herein, did proximately cause injuries received by 13 Claimant on or about June 19 , 1983, which injuries were 14 substantial in nature. 15 •This claim is not to be construed as limiting or 16 excluding any other theories of liability, legal or factual, 17 which may become known to the Claimant upon discovery 18 conducted during the course of investigation or litigation. 19 The amount claimed as of the date of presentation of 20 this claim is $100 , 000. 00 , computed with special damages of 21 medical and dental care incurred and to be incurred in 22 excess of the sum of $8 ,000. 00 , as of the date of this 23 claim. 24 All other notices or other communications with regard 25 to this claim should be sent to Claimant at- Claimant' s 26 attorney ' s address: Philip R. Clarkson, 1042 Pacific, Suite 27 D. , San Luis Obispo, CA. , (805) 543-4897. 28 • DATED: PHILI R. CLARKSON ATTORNEY FOR Claimant -2- MiE r'P. AGENDA j N D l d 101V3 ITEM#. i Lafferty Gov Claim 9/26/83 F014 :bs ! (SPACE BELOW FOR FUING STAMP ONLY) 1 GREEN E. O'REILLY, AGNEW & BROILLET A LAW CORPORATION • WIL BOULEVARD `Z LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIALIF 90017-1993 (213) 482-1122 (213) 482-1330 3 4 Plaintiff SEP 2 7 10-83 5 Attorneys for ATASCADERO 6 7 8 9 10 11 EDWARD J. LAFFERTY, ) CLAIM NO. 12 Claimant, ) CLAIM FOR DAMAGES PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE, § 910 ET 13 vs. ) SEQ. , INTER ALIA • 14 CITY OF ATASCADERO; CITY Or- - ATASCADERO F ATASCADERO POLICE DEPARTMENT; ) 15 COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO; ) COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO ) 16 SHERIFF ' S DEPARTMENT; and STATE ) 17 OF CALIFORNIA, Respondents . ) ) 18 19 TO RESPONDENTS , CITY OF ATASCADERO; CITY OF ATASCADERO 20 POLICE DEPARTMENT; COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO; COUNTY OF SAN LUIS 21 OBISPO SHERIFF ' S DEPARTMENT; and STATE OF CALIFORNIA 22 I 23 You are hereby notified that claimant, EDWARD J. i 's 24 LAFFERTY, whose address is c/o Greene, O' Reilly, Agnew & Broillet, f 25 1122 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles , California 90017 , claims 26 damages in the amount of One Million Dollars ($1,000 , 000) in • 27 , accordance with the Claim set forth below. 28 i i s 1 CLAIM OF EDWARD J. LAFFERTY 2 0 3 This Claim is based upon severe personal injuries 4 received by EDWARD J. LAFFERTY on or about June 19 , 1983 , when he 5 was arrested and incarcerated by the respondents. Claimant' s 6 personal injuries were occasioned by, among other things , the 7 intentional, reckless , negligent and careless conduct of the 8 respondents, their agents and/or representatives, and each of 9 them, which conduct was, but is not limited to the following: 10 J -' 11 EDWARD J. LAFFERTY was arrested and imprisoned by O W m 12 respondents on June 19 , 1983 . At the time of said arrest and CO oO Cr 0 3z 't(b 13 imprisonment he was a known -epileptic and carried around his neck W f ] N 0 Z Z M � m o ° ° NN 14 a chain that alerted people to his condition and gave them a � W, ! � O = J v J 3 a V m m 15 number to call in case of emergency. In spite of this knowle "_- 16 on the part of respondents, said respondents removed said chain .o Z Q z o 17 and incarcerated plaintiff without any medical or other precau- W J cr18 tions. At said time and place the claimant was severely, inten- 19 tionally and repeatedly beaten, kicked, punched, held, assaulted 20 and battered by the respondents, their agents and representatives , 21 and each of them, thereby sustaining the severe and permanent 22 injuries complained of. 23 24 All notices and/or other communications with regard to 25 this Claim should be sent to claimant, c/o Greene, O'Reilly, Agnew 26 27 /// • 28 -2- 1 & Broillet, 1122 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles , California 2 90017 . 3 4 DATED: September 26 , 1983 . GREENE, O'REILLY, AGNEW & BROILLET 5 7 WIIIIAM N. McMILLAN Attorneys for Claimant 8 EDWARD J. LAFFERTY 9 10 w J -' 0 M 12 co o 0 p 3: ;: > 13 w O j a N 0. rn Z v o m 0 N 15 7 14 _ CD v � v U m m FU < N w NW 16 .O i LU 17 Z o w 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3- 1 PROOF OF SERVICE BY HAND 2 3 I declare that: 4 I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of 5 California. 6 I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to 7 the within cause; my business address is 1122 Wilshire Boulevard, 8 Los Angeles, California 90017 . 9 On September 27 , 1983 , I caused to be served the within F 10 CLAIM FOR DAMAGES PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT , 11 CODE , § 910 ET SEQ. , INTER ALIA O o, — m „ 12 3Z ` ° by hand delivery, addressed as follows: q W < N0 13 W F j Z ry N ° 0 ry '414 SEE ATTACHED LIST Q o � �-1 x � J 3 � Vcnm 15 � < , W I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is W < N W.... NW 16 '0 _ Q true and correct, and that this Declaration was executed on W N 17 WSeptember 26 , 1983 , at Los Angeles, California. / � 18 19 20 NK J.ZE;'XIANE, JR.21 r 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 i 1 SERVICE LIST 2 3 City Clerk 4 City of Atascadero 5 6500 Palma Avenue 6 Administration Blvd. (Big Dome) 7 Attn: Patsy Hester, Rm. 201 A.M. 8 Rm. 103 P.M. 9 �. 10 w J 11 Board of Supervisors o M 7 12 County Clerk' s Office dS o 0 a 0 3:z>m13 Government Center, Rm. 385 w f j Z N In m o NN 14 San Luis Obi-spo, California 93408 CO v � � u15 Attn: Vicki J J 6; ; w < N W a: NW 16 .0 z - z w 17 z 0 w J a: 18 U 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 i27 28 lTEM # E..t ORDINANCE NO. 70 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO ADDING TITLE 8 (BUILDING REGULATIONS) TO THE ATASCADERO `MUNICI- PAL CODE AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, 1982 EDITION, PUBLISHED BY THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF BUILDING OFFICIALS; THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE, INCLUDING APPENDIX CHAPTERS 1, 7, 32, 38 , 57 AND 70 , 1982 EDITION, AND THE UNI- FORM BUILDING CODE STANDARDS, ALL PUBLISHED BY THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF BUILDING OFFICIALS; THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE, 1981 EDITION, PUBLISHED BY THE NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION; THE UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE, INCLUDING ALL APPENDICES, 1982 EDI- TION, AND THE IAPMO INSTALLATION STANDARDS,; 1982 EDITION, ALL PUBLISHED BY THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCI- ATION OF PLUMBING AND MECHANICAL OFFICIALS; THE UNI- FORM MECHANICAL CODE, INCLUDING ALL APPENDICES, 1982 EDITION, PUBLISHED BY THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF PLUMBING AND MECHANICAL OFFICIALS; THE UNIFORM SWIMMING POOL, SPA AND HOT TUB CODE, 1982 EDITION, PUBLISHED BY THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF PLUMBING AND MECHANICAL OFFICIALS; THE UNIFORM SIGN CODE, 1982 EDITION, PUBLISHED BY THE INTER- NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF BUILDING OFFICIALS; THE UNI- FORM FIRE CODE, INCLUDING APPENDIX CHAPTERS' I-A, I-B, II-A, II-B, II-D, III-A, III-C, IV-A, V-A AND VI-A, 1982 EDITION, AND THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE STANDARDS, 1982 EDITION, PUBLISHED BY THE WESTERN FIRE CHIEFS ASSOCIATION AND THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF BUILDING OFFICIALS; THE UNIFORM HOUSING CODE, 1982 EDITION, PUBLISHED BY THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF BUILDING OFFICIALS; THE UNIFORM CODE FOR ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS BUILDINGS, 1982 EDITION, PUBLISHED BY THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF BUILDING OFFICIALS, ALL AS AMENDED, AND REPEALING TITLE 19 (BUILDING REGULATIONS) OF THE SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY CODE AS ADOPTED BY CITY OF ATASCADERO ORDINANCE NO.. 2 ON JULY 2, 1979 . The Atascadero City Council ordains as follows: Section 1. The Atascadero Municipal Code is amended by repeal- ing Title 19 entitled "Building and Construction" of the San Luis Obispo County Code as adopted by City of Atascadero Ordinance No. 2 on July 2, 1979 . • Section 2. Title 8 (Building Regulations) is added to the Atas- cadero Municipal Code to read as follows: 0 0 TITLE 8 - BUILDING REGULATIONS TITLE 8 - BUILDING REGULATIONS • Chapter 1. Administrative Code 8-1.101. Adoption of Uniform Administrative Code. Certain doc- uments marked and designated as the "Uniform Administrative Code" , 1982 Edition, published by the International Conference of Building Officials, are hereby adopted for establishing administrative, organ- izational and enforcement- rules and regulations for technical codes which regulate site preparation and construction, alteration, moving, demolition, repair, use and occupancy of buildings, structures and building service equipment. Each and all of the regulations, provi- sions, conditions and terms of such "Uniform Administrative Code" , 1982 Edition, published by the International Conference of Building Officials, on file in the Planning Department, are hereby referred to and made a part hereof as if fully set out in this Chapter , except as otherwise provided in this Chapter. 8-1.102. Modification of Certain Parts of the Uniform Adminis- trative Code. The following portions of the "Uniform Administrative Code" , 1982 Edition, are hereby deleted: (a) Section 204 (Board of Appeals) • (b) Section 304 (a) (Permit Fees) (c) Section 304 (b) (Plan Review Fees) (d) Section 304 (d) (2) (Fee) Change reference to .. . . . .Tables Nos. 3-A through 3-F" to read " . . . the resolution of the City Coun- cil establishing fees. " (e) Section 305 (h) (Reinspections) Change reference to " . . . Tables Nos. 3-A through 3-E" to read " . . . . the resolution of the City Council establishing fees. " (f) Table No. 3-A (Building Permit Fees) (g) Table No. 3-B (Electrical Permit Fees) (h) Table No. 3-C (Mechanical Permit Fees) (i) Table No. 3-D (Plumbing Permit Fees) (j) Table No. 3-E (Grading Permit Fees) (k) Table No. 3-F (Grading Plan Review Fees) • 8-1. 103. Establishment of Board of Appeals. In order to conduct hearings to determine the suitability of alternate materials and meth- 2 r TITLE 8 - BUILDING REGULATIONS ods of installation and to provide for reasonable interpretations of the provisions of this Title, a Board of Appeals is hereby estab- lished. The Board of Appeals shall also make interpretations of and hear appeals pursuant to the Housing and Dangerous Building Codes. (a) Membership. The Board of Appeals shall consist of five (5) members, two (2) of whom shall be general contractors, one (1) of whom shall be a structural engineer or architect, one (1) of whom shall be a specialty contractor , all of whom shall be qualified by experience and training, and one (1) of whom shall be a member of the public who is not one of the foregoing. Members of the Board of Appeals shall be appoint- ed by and serve at the pleasure of the City Council. Each member shall comply with applicable provisions of the Polit- ical Reform Act of 1974 , California Government Section 81000 , et seq. The Building Official shall serve as Secretary to the Board of Appeals. (b) Eligibility. A person shall live within the City to be eligible for appointment to the Board of Appeals. (c) Term. Terms of initial appointment shall be a term of two (2) years for two (2) members and four (4) years for three (3) members. Subsequent appointments shall be for a term of four (4) years. (d) Rules and Regulations. The Board of Appeals shall adopt reasonable rules and regulations, subject to approval by the City Council, for conducting its business. The Board shall render all decisions and findings in writing with a copy to the appellant. (e) Appeal Procedure. Any person aggrieved by a decision of the Planning Department related to any manner within the pur- view of this Title shall have the right to appeal the deci- sion. The appeal shall be filed with the Building Official within fourteen (14) days after the rendering of the decision- affecting the aggrieved person. Grounds for the appeal shall be set forth in writing. The Secretary of the Board shall set the time and place for a hearing on the appeal, and notice of the hearing shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation and shall be given to the appellant by mailing it to him, postage prepaid, at his last known address, at least ten (10) calendar days prior to the date set for hearing. Any written reports to be made to the Boardshall be filed with the Secretary of the Board and shall be made available to the Board and to the public no less than three (3) working days prior to the date set for the hearing. Any Department . Head shall have the right to be heard on any matter coming before the Board. 3 TITLE 8 - BUILDING REGULATIONS The decision of the Board on the appeal shall not become fin- al until fourteen (14) days after the Board has made its de- termination in order to allow time for an appeal to be made to the Council from the Board's decision. Any party aggrieved by the determination of the Board shall have the right to appeal its determination to the Council. Such appeals must be filed with the City Clerk within four- teen (14) days after the Board has made its determination. The Council shall set appeal fees by resolution. There shall be no charge for city-initiated appeals. 8-1.104. Fees. Fees for permits, plan review, reinspections, special inspections, appeals and other activities of this Title shall be established by resolution of the City Council. The determination of value or valuation under any of the provisions of this Title shall be made by the Building Official. The value to be used in computing the building permit and building permit plan review fees shall be the total value of all construction work for which the permit is issued as well as all finish work, painting, roofing, electrical, plumbing, heating, air-conditioning, elevators, fire-extinguishing systems and any other permanent equipment. 8-1. 105. Exempted Work. The following shall be added to Section 301 (b) : 115. Sign Permits. The following signs shall not require a sign permit. These exemptions shall not be construed as relieving the owner of the sign from the responsibility of its erection and maintenance, and its compliance with the provisions of this code or any other law or ordinance regulating the same. A. The changing of the advertising copy or message on a painted or printed sign only. Except for theater mar- quees and similar signs specifically designed for the use of replaceable copy, electric signs shall not be included in this exception. B. Painting, repainting or cleaning of an advertising structure or the changing of the advertising copy or message thereon shall not be considered an erection or alteration which requires a sign permit unless a struc- tural change is made. C. Signs less than six (6) feet above grade. 6. Swimming Pool, Spa, and Hot Tub Permits. No permit shall be required in the case of any repair work including: The stopping of leaks in drains, soil, waste or vent pipe, pro- vided, however, that should any trap; drainpipe; or soil, waste or vent pipe be or become defective and it becomes nec- essary to remove and replace the same with new material in 4 0 0 TITLE 8 - BUILDING REGULATIONS any part or parts, the same shall be considered as such new work and a permit shall be procured and inspection made as hereinbefore provided. No permit shall be required for the clearing of stoppages or the repairing of leaks in pipes, valves or fixtures, when such repairs do not involve or re- quire the replacement or rearrangement of valves, pipes or fixtures." 8-1. 106. Permits Required. Section 301 (a) shall be revised to read as follows: "Permits Required. It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to erect, construct, enlarge, alter,; repair, move, im- prove, remove, convert or demolish any building or structure, in- cluding a swimming pool, spa or hot tub, or make any installation, alteration, repair , replacement, or remodel any building service equipment, including swimming pool, spa and hot tub equipment, regulated by this Title, except as specified in 'Subsection (b) of this Section, or cause the same to be done without first obtaining a separate, appropriate permit for each building, structure or service equipment from the Building Official. " TITLE 8 BUILDING REGULATIONS Chapter 2. Building Code 8-2.101. Adoption of Uniform Building Code. Certain documents marked and designated as the "Uniform Building Code" , including Ap- pendix Chapter 1 (Life Safety Requirements for Existing Buildings) , Chapter 7 - Part 1 (Covered Mall Buildings) , Chapter 32 (Re-roofing) , Chapter 38 (Basement Pipe Inlets) , Chapter 57 (Regulations Governing Fallout Shelters) and Chapter 70 (Excavation and Grading) , 1982 Edi- tion, and as the "Uniform Building Code Standards" , 1982 Edition,pub- lished by the International Conference of Building Officials, are hereby adopted for regulating the erection, construction, enlargement, alteration, repair, moving, removal, demolition, conversion, occu- pancy, equipment, use, height, area and maintenance of all buildings or structures. Each and all of the regulations, provisions, condi- tions, and terms of such "Uniform Building Code" ,I 1982 Edition, and the "Uniform Building Code Standards" , 1982 Edition, published by the International Conference of Building Officials, on file in the Plan- ning Department, are hereby referred to and made a part hereof as if fully set out in this Chapter, except as otherwise provided in this Chapter. 8-2. 102. Deletion of Certain Parts of the Uniform Building Code. The following portions of the "Uniform Building Code, " 1982 Edition, are hereby deleted: 5 i TITLE 8 - BUILDING REGULATIONS (a) Chapter 1 (Title, Scope and General), including Sections 101-107 (b) Chapter 2 (Organization and Enforcement) , including Sections 201-205 (c) Chapter 3 (Permits and Inspections) , including Sections 301- 307 and Table No. 3-A 8-2.103. Fire Retardant Roofing Materials Required. Roof cover- ings for all new buildings and for any re-roofing of existing build- ings shall be no less than Class C, regardless of building type or occupancy. Skylights and similar roofing materials_ shall be construe- ----_ _ tedof noncombustible materials Any reference to-the approved use of �h �f-ing materia s with less than a Class C rating is hereby deleted. 8-2.104. Grading. Section 7410 (a) is hereby amended to read as follows: "General. Unless otherwise recommended in an approved soils engineering report, fills shall conform to the provisions of this Section, except that lots located outside the Urban Services Line may exceed the 50 cubic yard limitation for a fill when approved by the Building Official and when in compliance with the following (1) All other limitations established by Subsection 9 of Section 7003 ; and (2) The lot is a minimum of 2 1/2 acres; and (3) The location and extent of the fill is clearly delinea- ted on grading plans. " TITLE 8 - BUILDING REGULATIONS Chapter 3. Electrical Code 8-3. 101. Adoption of National Electrical Code. Certain documents marked and designated as the "National Electrical Code", 1981 Edition, published by the National Fire Protection Association, are hereby adopted for safeguarding persons and property from hazards arising. from the use of electricity. Each and all of the regulations, provi- sions, conditions, and terms of such "National Electrical Code" , 1981 Edition, published by the National Fire Protection Association, on file in the Planning Department, are hereby referred to and made a part hereof as if fully set out in this Chapter . 6 ! 0 TITLE 8 - BUILDING REGULATIONS TITLE 8 - BUILDING REGULATIONS Chapter 4. Plumbing Code 8-4.101. Adoption of Uniform Plumbing Code. Certain documents marked and designated as the "Uniform Plumbing Code" , including all appendices, 1982 Edition, published by the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials, and as "'IAPMO Installation Standards" , 1982 Edition, published by the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials, are hereby adopted for regu- lating the erection, installation, alteration, addition, repair , re- location, replacement, maintenance or use of any plumbing system. Each and all of the regulations, provisions, conditions, and terms of such "Uniform Plumbing Code" , 1982 Edition, and "'IAPMO Installation Standards" , 1982 Edition, published by the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials, on file in the Planning Depart- ment, are hereby referred to and made a part hereof as if fully set out in this Chapter , except as otherwise provided in this Chapter. 8-4.102. Deletion of Certain Parts of the Uniform Plumbing Code. The following portions of the "Uniform Plumbing Code, " 1982 Edition, are hereby deleted: (a) Part 1 (Administration) , including Sections 10 .1-10 . 5 and 20 .1-20. 14 (b) Table 1-1, entitled "Location of Sewage Disposal System" (c) Section I-4 (Percolation Tests) (d) Section I-8 (Cesspools) (e) Table I-4 , entitled "Design Criteria of 5 Typical Soils" (f) Table I-5 8-4.103. Use of Plastic Pipe in Water Systems. PB, PVC and CPVC, as well as any other plastic pipe, shall not be used for hot and cold water distribution systems. Any reference to the approved use of such materials is hereby deleted. 8-4. 104. Building Sewers. The following requirements shall apply to building sewers and related drainage piping. Any reference to different standards in Table 4-3 or Chapter 11 of the Uniform Plumbing Code is hereby deleted. 7 TITLE 8 - BUILDING REGULATIONS (a) All building sewers shall be constructed with pipe of inter- nal diameter not less than four (4) inches. (b) A clean-out shall be placed in every building sewer within five (5) feet of each building, at all changes in alignment or grade in excess of twenty-two and one-half (22 1/2) de- grees, within five (5) feet of the junction with the public sewer , and at intervals not to exceed one hundred (100) feet in straight runs. The clean-out shall be made by inserting a "Y" fitting in the line and fitting the clean-out in the "Y" branch in an approved manner. In the case of a clean-out near the junction of the public sewer, the "Y" branch shall be extended to a depth of not more than two (2) feet, nor less than one foot below the surface of the ground before the clean-out is installed. (c) Drainage piping serving fixtures located at an elevation of less than one foot above the nearest upstream manhole cover in the main sewer serving said fixtures shall drain by grav- ity into the main sewer, and shall be protected from backflow of sewage by installing an. approved type backwater valve, and each such backwater valve shall be installed only in that branch or section of the drainage system which receives the discharge from fixtures located less than one foot above the nearest upstream manhole cover. 8-4.105. Private Sewage Disposal Systems. The design, installa- tion, operation and maintenance of private sewage disposal systems shall be in conformance with Appendix I of the Uniform Plumbing Code and with standards specified in this Section. Where specific stand- ards are not provided within this Title or where the Administrative Authority determines that higher requirements are necessary to main- tain a safe and sanitary condition, the "Manual of Septic Tank Prac- tice" (published by the United States Department of Health, Education and Welfare) , the "Design Manual - Onsite Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Systems" (published by the United States Environmental Pro- tection Agency) , "Guidelines for Mound Systems" (State Water Resources Control Board) , "Guidelines for Evapotranspiration Systems (State Water Resources Control Board) , and the "Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin" (adopted by the Regional Water Quality Control Board of the Central Coast Region) shall be used as guidelines by the Administrative Authority. (a) Percolation Test. An on-site investigation shall be made in order to determine the suitability of a particular site for a private sewage disposal system and to provide the data necessary to design a private sewage disposal system. A percolation test shall be required prior to issuance of a permit for all new or enlarged private sewage disposal sys- tems. The following percolation test procedure shall be used in performing percolation tests, except that other accepted test procedures may be used when approved by the Administra- tive Authority. 8 • TITLE 8 - BUILDING REGULATIONS (1) Number and Location of Test Holes: A minimum of three separate test holes spaced uniformly through and located in the immediate vicinity of the proposed leach field site shall be made. (2) Type of Test Holes: The test hole shall have horizon- tal dimensions between 4 and 12 inches and vertical sides to the depth of the absorption trench. (3) Preparation of Test Hole: Smeared soil surfaces shall be removed from the sides and bottom of the test hole to provide a natural soil interface. All loose material shall be removed from the test hole. Two inches of coarse sand or fine gravel shall be added to the test hole to protect the bottom from scouring and sediment. (4) Soil Saturation and Swelling: The test hole is to be carefully filled to a depth of one foot above the gravel or sand with clear water which is to be kept in the hole for at least four hours but preferably overnight. This step may be omitted i.n sandy soils containing little or no clay. (5) Measurement of Percolation Rate: The percolation rate shall be determined twenty-four hours after water is first added to the test holes; except, in sandy soils containing little or no clay, the percolation rate shall be determined after the water from one filling of the test hole has completely seeped away. (i) If water remains in the test hole after the over- night swelling period, adjust the depth to approxi- mately six inches over the gravel or sand and, from a fixed reference point, measure the drop in water level over a thirty minute period to calculate the percolation rate. (ii) If no water remains in the test hole after the overnight swelling period, add clear water to bring the depth of water in the test hole to approximate- ly six inches over the gravel or sand. From a fixed reference point, measure the drop in water level at approximately thirty minute intervals over four hours refilling six inches over the gravel or sand as necessary. The drop that occurs during the final thirty minute period is used to calculate the percolation rate. The drops during prior periods provide information for possible modification of. the test procedure to suit local conditions. (iii) In sandy soils (or in other soils in which the . first six inches of water seeps away in less than thirty minutes after the overnight swelling peri- od) , the time interval between measurements shall be taken as ten minutes and the test shall run for 9 • 0 TITLE 8 - BUILDING REGULATIONS one hour with the drop during the final ten minutes being used to calculate the percolation rate. (6) Deep Boring: A soil boring, to a minimum depth of ten (10) feet below the bottom of the absorption trench, shall be made in order to determine the presence of bedrock and/or ground water . (b) General Design Standards: The following standards shall be used in the design of new or enlarged private sewage disposal systems where the percolation rate does not exceed 60 min- utes per inch. (1) Determination of Size of Absorption Area: The absorp- tion area, measured in lineal feet of absorption trench, shall be calculated as set forth in this Section. Tables 4-1 (Absorption Area Requirements) and 4-2 (Standard Trench Adjustment Factors) , included in this Subsection, shall be referred to as necessary. (absorption area per bedroom) X no. of bedrooms) X (standard (width of trench, in inches) trench adjust- ment factor) factor) TABLE 4-1. Absorption Area Requirements. Percolation Rate Absorption Area Per Bedroom (Minutes/Inch) (Square Feet) 0- 9 150 10 165 11-15 190 16-20 215 21-25 230 26-30 250 31-35 270 36-40 285 41-45 300 46-50 315 51-60 330 10 i • TITLE 8 - BUILDING REGULATIONS TABLE 4-2. Standard Trench Adjustment Factor 1 Depth of Gravel Below Pipe Trench Width (in inches) (in Inches) 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 12 75 78 80 82 83 85 86 87 87 18 60 64 66 69 71 73 75 77 78 24 50 54 57 60 62 64 66 68 70 30 43 47 50 53 55 58 60 62 64 36 37 41 44 47 50 52 54 56 58 42 33 37 40 43 45 48 50 52 54 48 30 33 36 39 42 ' 44 46 48 50 1. For trenches not shown in Table 4-2 , the standard trench adjust- ment factor may be computed as follows: W + 2 X 100 W + 1 + 2D Where W = width of trench (in feet) D = depth of gravel below pipe (in feet) (2) Location of Private Sewage Disposal Systems: The min- imum distance between components of a private sewage disposal system and other site features shall be as set forth in Table 4-3 (Horizontal Distance Separation) and and Table 4-4 (Vertical Distance Separation) . Where physical limitations on a site preclude conformance with distance separation requirements, the Administrative Authority may approve a lesser separation when the de- sign is prepared by a registered engineer competent in sanitary engineering and when adequate substantiating data is submitted with the design. The Administrative Authority shall not approve a separation less than that set forth in the "Water Quality Control Plan Central Coast Region" unless the Regional Water Quality Control Board or its designated representatives have previously approved the design. 11 i 0 TITLE 8 - BUILDING REGULATIONS TABLE 4-3. Horizontal Distance Separation (in feet) Building Septic Leach Field Seepage Sewer Tank or Seepage Pit A Bed Buildings or structures, in- 2 5 10 10 cluding porches, steps, breeze- ways, patios, and carports whether covered or not 2 Property Line Clear 5 5 10 3 Water Supply Well 50 50 100 150 Streams,__ he_n shown on 7 1/2 50 50 100 100 mute USGS Map Swales, ephemeral draws, or 50 50 50 50 other natural watercourses with drainage areas larger than 10 acres Trees -- 10 -- 10 Seepage Pits -- 5 5 12 Leach Field or Seepage Bed -- 5 6 5 4 On-site domestic water service 1 5 5 5 line Distribution Box -- -- 5 5 5 Pressure Public Water Main 10 10 10 10 6 6 Sloping ground, cuts, or other -- -- 15 15 embankments 7 7 Reservoirs, including ponds, 200 200 200 200 lakes, tanks, basins, etc. for storage, regulation and con- trol of water , recreation, power, flood control or drinking Springs 100 100 100 100 1. Distance separation shall be increased to twenty (20) feet when building or structure is located on a downward slope below a leach field, seepage bed or seepage pit. 2. See Section 315 (c) of Uniform Plumbing Code. 3. Distance separation may be reduced to twenty-five (25) feet when the drainage piping is constructed of materials approved for use within a building. 12 TITLE 8 - BUILDING REGULATIONS • 4 . See Section 1108 of Uniform Plumbing Code. 5. For parallel construction or crossings, approval by the Health Department shall be required. jA. Distance is measured as horizontal distance to daylight. 7. Distance is measured at spillway elevation. 1 TABLE 4-4. Vertical Distance Separation (in feet) Leach Field or Seepage Seepage bed Pit Ground water 5 10 edrock 4 4 1. Distance is measured from bottom of trench or pit. (3) Additional Standards: (i) Existing legal building sites which are served by an individual on-site well may be approved for a private sewage disposal system only if the site is one acre or larger in size. ( ii) Private sewage disposal systems proposed to be in- stalled on slopes of 20% or more; shall be designed by and have their installation inspected and certi- fied by a registered civil engineer. The design shall minimize grading disruption associated with access for installation and maintenance. Such systems shall be prohibited on slopes of 30% or more. (iii) When the percolation rate exceeds 30 minutes/inch, a private sewage disposal system shall be designed, inspected, and certified to work by a registered civil engineer. ( iv) When the percolation rate exceeds 60 minutes/inch, a private sewage disposal system using soil absorp- tion shall not be allowed. (v) When the percolation rate exceeds 30 minutes/inch, a private sewage disposal system using a seepage pit shall not be allowed. (vi) Expansion area shall be provided on all building • sites, shall be identified on all plans submitted for private sewage disposal systems, and shall re- main available for system expansion. If areas re- served for system expansion are not accessible for 13 i 0 TITLE 8 - BUILDING REGULATIONS future installation, then the expansion area shall be installed with the original system. (c) Special Design Standards. The following standards shall be used in the design of new or enlarged private sewage disposal systems where the percolation rate exceeds 60 minutes per inch. Designs for alternate types of private sewage disposal systems shall be by registered engineers competent in sani- tary engineering and may be approved by the Administrative Authority when the design engineer submits adequate substan- tiation data with the design. (1) Determination of Size of Disposal Field: The size of the disposal field shall be determined by the design engineer using methods of accepted engineering practice including manuals and documents specified in this Chapter. (2) Location of Private Sewage Disposal Systems: The min- imum distance between components of a private sewage disposal system and other site features shall be as set forth in Table 4-3 (Horizontal Distance Separation) and Table 4-4 (Vertical Distance Separation) using the col- umn entitled "Leach Field or Seepage Bed. " (3) Additional Standards: (i) When private sewage disposal systems are designed pursuant to Subsection (c) of the Section, the de- sign engineer shall provide the owner with infor- mation on the location, design, operation and maintenance of the private sewage disposal system. A covenant shall also be recorded prior to final approval of the system indicating the name and location of the design engineer and indicating where the above information can be secured. (ii) Existing legal building sites which are served by an individual on-site well may be approved for a private sewage disposal system only if the site is one acre or larger in size. (iii) Expansion area shall be provided on all building sites, shall be identified on all plans submitted for private sewage disposal systems, and shall re- main available for system expansion. If areas reserved for system expansion are not accessible for future installation, then the expansion area shall be installed with the original system. (d) Replacement of Existing Private Sewage Disposal Systems. Where an existing private sewage disposal system has failed, the replacement system shall be designed in conformance with this Chapter and shall be designed by a registered engineer competent in sanitary engineering. In the event that the 14 # 0 TITLE 8 - BUILDING REGULATIONS replacement system cannot be designed to conform with this Chapter, the Administrative Authority may approve a system designed to lesser standards when it is designed, inspected, and certified to work by a registered engineer competent in sanitary engineering. (1) A private sewage disposal system shall not be replaced by another system if sewers are available. (2) The Administrative Authority shall not approve a re- placement system which does not conform with prohibi- tions set forth in the "Water Quality Control Plan - Central Coast Basin" unless the Regional Water Quality Control Board or its designated representatives has previously approved the design. The Administrative Authority may authorize a temporary means of sewage disposal pending such approval. TITLE 8 - BUILDING REGULATIONS Chapter 5. Mechanical Code 8-5.101. Adoption of Uniform Mechanical Code. Certain documents marked and designated as the "Uniform Mechanical Code", including all appendices, 1982 Edition, published by the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials, are hereby adopted for regula- ting and controlling the design, construction, installation, quality of materials, location, operation and maintenance or use of heating, ventilating, cooling, refrigeration systems, incinerators and other miscellaneous heat-producing appliances. Each and all of the regula- tions, provisions, conditions and terms of such "Uniform Mechanical Code" , 1982 Edition, published by the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials, on file in the Planning Department, are hereby referred to and made a part hereof, as if fully set out in this Chapter, except as otherwise provided in this Chapter. 8-5.102. Deletion of Certain Parts of the Uniform Mechanical Code The following portions of the "Uniform Mechanical Code, " 1982 Edition, are hereby deleted: (a) Chapter 1 (Title, Scope and General) , including Sections 101-107 (b) Chapter 2 (Organization and Enforcement) , including Sections 201-204 15 ! 0 TITLE 8 BUILDING REGULATIONS (c) Chapter 3 (Permits and Inspections) , including Sections 301- 306 and Table No. 3-A 8-5.103. Installation of Liquefied Petroleum Gas-burning Appli- ances. The following shall be added to the last paragraph of Sec- tion 504 (Installation) : . . . . "When appliances so fueled are located in underfloor or attic areas, provision shall be made to drain the appliance to the out- side of the building. TITLE 8 - BUILDING REGULATIONS Chapter 6. Swimming Pool, Spa and Hot Tub Code 8-6.101. Adoption of Uniform Swimming Pool, S a and Hot Tub Code Certain documents marked and designated as the "Uniform Swimming Pool, Spa and Hot Tub Code" , 1982 Edition, published by the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials, are hereby adopted for regulating the erection, installation, alteration, addition, re- pair, relocation, replacement, maintenance or use of any swimming pool, spa or hot tub plumbing system. Each and all of the regula- tions, provisions, conditions, and terms of such "Uniform Swimming Pool, Spa and Hot Tub Code", 1982 Edition, published by the Interna- tional Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials, on file in the Planning Department, are hereby referred to and made a part hereof as if fully set out in this Chapter. 8-6.102. Deletion of Certain Parts of the Uniform Swimming Pool, Spa and Hot Tub Code. The following portions of the "Uniform Swim- ming Pool, Spa and Hot Tub Code, " 1982 Edition, are hereby deleted: (a) Part 1 (Administration) including Section 1.0-1. 9 and 1.11-1. 18 8-6.103. Swimming Pool Defined. The definition of a swimming pool in Section 102 of the "Uniform Swimming Pool, Spa and Hot Tub Code, " 1982 Edition, shall be revised to read as follows: "Swimming Pool - Any constructed or prefabricated pool used for. swimming or bathing. 16 0 0 TITLE 8 - BUILDING REGULATIONS TITLE 8 BUILDING REGULATIONS Chapter 7. Sign Code 8-7.101. Adoption of Uniform Sign Code. Certain documents marked and designated as the "Uniform Sign Code, " 1982 Edition, published by the International Conference of Buildng Officials, ;are hereby adopted for regulating the design, quality of materials, construction, loca- tion, electrification, and maintenance of all signs and sign struc- tures. Each and all of the regulations, provisions, conditions and terms of such "Uniform Sign Code", 1982 Edition, published by the In- ternational Conference of Building Officials, on file in the Planning Department, are hereby referred to and made a part hereof as if fully set out in this Chapter , except as otherwise provided in this Chapter. 8-7 .102. Deletion of Certain Parts of the Uniform Sign Code. The following portions of the "Uniform Sign Code" , 1982 'Edition, are here- by deleted: (a) Chapter 1 (Title, Scope and Enforcement) , including Sections 101-103 (b) Chapter 3 (Permits, Fees and Inspections) , including Sections 301-306 (c) Section 1401 (Temporary Signs - General) TITLE 8 - BUILDING REGULATIONS Chapter 8. Fire Code 8-8.101. Adoption of Uniform Fire Code. Certain documents marked and designated as the "Uniform Fire Code" , including; Appendix Chapter I-A (Life Safety Requirements for Existing Buildings) , Chapter I-B (Stairway Identification) , Chapter II-A (Suppression and control of Hazardous Fire Areas) , Chapter II-B (Protection of Flammable or Com- bustible Liquids in Tanks in Locations That May Be Flooded) , Chapter II-D (Rifle Ranges) , Chapter III-A (Test Procedures for Fire Extin- guishing Systems) , Chapter III-B (Basement Pipe Inlets) , Chapter III-C (Fire Alarm Systems) , Chapter IV-A (Interior Floor Finish) , Chapter V-A (Nationally Recognized Standards of Good Practice) , and Chapter VI-A (Emergency Relief Venting for Fire Exposure' for Aboveground Tanks) , 1982 Edition, and the "Uniform Fire Code Standards" , 1982 Edition, are hereby adopted for the purpose of prescribing regulations governing conditions hazardous to life and property from fire or ex- plosion. Each and all of the regulations, provisions, conditions, and 17 • TITLE 8 - BUILDING REGULATIONS terms of such "Uniform Fire Code" , 1982 Edition, and the "Uniform Fire Code Standards" , 1982 Edition, published by the Western Fire Chiefs Association and the International Conference of Building Officials, on file in the Planning Department are hereby referred to and made a part hereof as if fully set out in this Chapter , except as otherwise pro- vided in this Chapter. 8-8.102. Deletion of Certain Parts of the Uniform Fire Code. The following portions of the "Uniform Fire Code" , 1982 Edition, are here- by deleted: (a) Section 2. 302 (Board of Appeals) 8-8. 103. Board of Appeals. In order to provide for interpreta- tion of the provisions of the Chapter and to hear approvals provided for hereunder, the Board of Appeals established pursuant to Section 8-1. 103 shall govern. Procedures specified by Section 8-1. 103 (c) shall be followed. 8-8.104. Alarm Signal Defined. The definition of an alarm signal in Section 4 of Appendix III-C, shall be revised as follows: " (c) Alarm Signal. Audible devices may be bells, horns, chimes speakers or similar devices but no audible alarm shall con- flict with the response of emergency vehicles or civil de- fense systems. Under no circumstances shall sirens of wail, yelp or hi-lo soundings be used. All devices shall be ap- proved by the Police and Fire Chiefs. " TITLE 8 BUILDING REGULATIONS Chapter 9. Housing Code 8-9. 101. Adoption of Uniform Housing Code. Certain documents marked and designated as the "Uniform Housing Code" , 1982 Edition, published by the International Conference of Building Officials, are hereby adopted for regulating the use and occupancy, location and maintenance of residential buildings and structures. Each and all of the regulations, provisions, conditions and terms of such "Uniform Housing Code" , 1982 Edition, published by the International Conference of Building officials, on file in the Planning Department, are hereby referred to and made a part hereof as if fully set out in this Chap- ter, except as otherwise provided in this Chapter. 18 0 0 TITLE 8 - BUILDING REGULATIONS 8-9.102. Deletion of Certain Parts of the Uniform Housing Code. The following portions of the "Uniform Housing Code" , 1982 Edition, are hereby deleted: (a) Section 203 (Housing Advisory and Appeals Board) 8-9 .103. References to Building Code. References made in Chap- ters 1, 2 and 3 of the "Uniform Housing Code" , 1982 Edition, to vari- ous administrative sections and chapters of the Buildng Code shall mean the corresponding sections and chapters of Chapter 1 of this Title. 8-9.104. Appeals Board. In order to provide for interpretation of the provisions of this Chapter and to hear appeals provided for hereunder, the Board of Appeals established pursuant to Section 8-1.103 shall govern. References to the Housing Advisory and Appeals Board in the Uniform Housing Code shall mean the Board of Appeals es- tablished pursuant to Section 8-1.103. Procedures specified by Sec- tion 8-1.103 (c) shall be followed except where additional procedures are required by this Chapter. 8-9.105. Time Limits for Appeals. The following portions of the "Uniform Housing Code" , 1982 Edition, are modified as specified: (a) Section 1101 (b) (5) is amended to change the appeal time from "30 days" to "14 days. " (b) The last paragraph of Section 1201 (a) is amended to read as follows: "The appeal shall be filed within 14 days from the date of service of such notice or action of the Building Official. " TITLE 8 BUILDING REGULATIONS ' Chapter 10. Dangerous Buildings Code 8-10 .101. Adoption of Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings. Certain documents marked and designated ;as the "Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings" , f1982 Edition, pub-, lished by the International Conference of Building Officials, are hereby adopted for regulating the repair, vacation or demolition of buildings or structures which may endanger the life, limb, health, morals, property, safety or welfare of the general public or their occupants. Each and all of the regulations, provisions, conditions and terms of such "Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Build- ings" , 1982 Edition, published by the International Conference of 19 0 0 TITLE 8 - BUILDING REGULATIONS Building Officials, on file in the Planning Department, are hereby referred to and made a part hereof as if fully set out in this Chapter. 8-10.102. Deletion of Certain Parts of the Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings. The following portions of the "Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings" , 1982 Edition, are hereby deleted: (a) Section 205 (Appeals Board) 8-10 .103. References to Building Code. References made in Chap- ters 1 and 2 of the "Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings" , 1982 Edition, to various administrative sections and chap- ters of the Building Code shall mean the corresponding sections and chapters of Chapter 1 of this Title. 8-10 .104. Appeals Board. In order. to provide for interpretation of the provisions of this Chapter and to hear appeals provided for hereunder, the Board of Appeals established pursuant .to Section 8-1. 103 shall govern. Procedures specified by Section 8-1. 103 (c) shall be followed except where additional procedures are required by this Chapter. 8-10 .105. Time Limit for Appeals. The following portions of the "Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings" , 1982 Edition, are modified as specified: (a) Section 401 (b) (5) is amended to change the appeal time from "30 days" to "14 days. " (b) The last paragraph of Section 501 (a) is amended to read as follows: "The appeal shall be filed within 14 days from the date of service of such notice or action of the Building Official. " Section 3. Penalty Provisions. It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to erect, construct, enlarge, alter, repair, move, improve, remove, convert or demolish, equip, use, occupy or maintain any building, structure or building service equipment or cause or permit the same to be done in violation of this Title and the technical codes. Penalties for violation of this Title shall be as set forth in Chapter 3 of Ordinance No. 10 of the City of Atascadero. 20 ! 0 TITLE 8 - BUILDING REGULATIONS Section 4. Publication. The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published once within fifteen (15) days after its passage in the 'Atascadero News, a newspaper of general circulation, printed, published, and circulated in the City in accordance with Section 36933 of the Government Code, shall certify the adopting and posting of this ordinance and shall cause this ordinance and this certification together with proof of posting to be entered into the Book of Ordinances of this City. Section 5. Effective Date. This ordinance shall go into effect and be in -full force and effect at 12:01 a.m. on the 31st day after its passage. The foregoing ordinance was introduced on and adopted at a regular meeting of the Council on AYES: NOES: ABSENT: E MARJ 0RIE M. MACK, Y, Mayor ATTEST: BARBARA NORRIS, ity Clerk APP,RQVED AS TO F e ALLEN GRIMES, City Attorney APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: MURRAY L. WARDEN, City Manager 21 A3 AGSNDA /d 0 �✓� r ave • RESOLUTION NO. 40-83 A RESOLUTION OF THE ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL ESTABLISHING FEES FOR PERMITS, PLAN REVIEWS AND OTHER ACTIVITIES UNDERTAKEN PURSUANT TO BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION REGULATIONS WHEREAS, the Government Code provides that fees may be collected to cover the costs of administering permit, plan review and inspection activities; and WHEREAS, it is appropriate to establish fees -and" deposits which provide for the user of services to pay for the cost of providing the services; and WHEREAS, the International Conference of Building Officials has prepared standardized fee schedules which are in widespread use, based on their experience with permit, plan review and inspection activi- ties; and WHEREAS, the Planning Department has prepared estimates based on its own experience for activities not included in the standardized fee schedules. • NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Atascadero City Council does hereby establish the following fees for permits, plan reviews, and other activities undertaken pursuant to building and construction regulations: TABLE NO. 1 - BUILDING PERMITS VALUATION PERMIT FEE $1. 00 to $500 .00 $10 .00 $501.00 to $2, 000.00 $10. 00 for the first $500. 00 plus $1. 50 for each additional $100.00 or fraction thereof, to and includ- ing $2, 000 .00 $2,001. 00 to $25,000.00 $32. 50 for the first $2,000. 00 plus $6. 00 for each additional $1,000 .00 or fraction thereof, to and includ- ing $25 ,000 .00 $25, 001.00 to $50 ,000 .00 $170 . 50 for the first $25, 000. 00 • plus $4. 50 for each additional $1, 000 .00 or fraction thereof, to and including $50 ,000 . 00 i 0 0 Resolution No. 40-83 $50 ,001. 00 to $100 ,000. 00 $283.00 for the first $50 ,000.00 • plus $3.00 for each additional $1,000 .00 or fraction thereof, to and including $100,000.00 $100 ,001.00 and up $433. 00 for the first $100 ,000.00 plus $2.50 for each additional $1,000 .00 or fraction thereof TABLE NO. 2 - ELECTRICAL PERMITS System Fee Schedule New Residential Buildings The following fees shall inlcude all wiring and elec- trical equipment in or on each building, or other electrical equipment on the same premises constructed at the same time. For new multifamily residential buildings (apartments and condominiums) having three or more living units not including the area of garages, carports and other noncommercial automobile storage areas con- structed at the same time, per square foot . . . . . . . .02 • For new single and two-family residential buildings not including the area of garages, carports and other noncommercial automobile storage areas con- structed at the same time, per square foot . . . . . . . .025 For other types of residential occupancies and altera- tions, additions and modifications to existing residential buildings, use the UNIT FEE SCHEDULE. Private Swimming Pools For new private, residential, in-ground swimming pools for single-family and multi-family occupancies including a complete system of necessary branch circuit wiring, bonding, grounding, underwater lighting, water pumping and other similar electri- cal equipment directly related to the operation of a swimming pool, each . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20.00 For other types of swimming pools, therapeutic whirl- pools, spas and alterations to existing swimming pools, use the UNIT FEE SCHEDULE. • 2 ! • Resolution No. 40-83 Carnivals and Circuses Carnivals, circuses, or other traveling shows or exhi- bitions utilizing transportable-type rides, booths, displays and attractions: For electric generators and electrically driven rides, each . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 .00 For mechanically driven rides and walk-through attrac- tions or displays having electric lighting,' each 3. 00 For a system of area and booth lighting, each 3.00 For permanently installed rides, booths, displays and attractions, use the UNIT FEE SCHEDULE. Temporary Power Services For a temporary service power pole or pedestal including all pole or pedestal-mounted receptacle outlets and appurtenances, each . . . . . . 10.00 For a temporary distribution system and temporary light- ing and receptacle outlets for construction sites, decorative light, Christmas tree sales lots, fire- work stands, etc. , each 5.00 Unit Fee Schedule Receptacle, Switch and Lighting Outlets For receptacle, switch, lighting or other outlets at which current is used or controlled, except ser- vices, feeders and meters: First 20, each . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .50 Additional outlets, each .30 NOTE: For multi-outlet assemblies, each 5 feet or frac- tion thereof may be considered as one outlet. Lighting Fixtures For lighting fixtures, sockets or other lamp-holding devices: First 20, each . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .50 Additional fixtures, each . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .30 is For pole or platform-mounted lighting fixtures, each . . . 50 3 0 0 Resolution No. 40-83 For theatrical-type lighting fixtures or assemblies, each .50 Residential Appliances For fixed residential applicances or receptacle outlets for same, including wall-mounted electric ovens; counter-mounted cooking tops; electric ranges; self- contained room, console, or through-wall air condi- tioners; space heaters; food waste grinders; dish- washers; washing machines; water heaters, clothes dryers; or other motor-operated appliances not ex- ceeding one horsepower (HP) in rating, each 2.00 NOTE: For other types of air conditioners and other motor-driven appliances having larger electrical ratings, see Power Apparatus. Nonresidential Appliances For residential applicances and self-contained factory- wired, nonresidential appliances not exceeding one horsepower (HP) , kilowatt (KW) , or kilovoltampere (KVA) , in rating including medical and dental de- vices; food, beverage, and ice cream cabinets; illuminated show cases; drinking fountains; vending machines; laundry machines; or other similar types ofequipment, each . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.00 NOTE: For other types of air conditions and other motor- driven applicances having larger electrical ratings, see Power Apparatus. Power Apparatus For motors, generators, transformers, rectifiers, syn- chronous converters, capacitors, industrial heat- ing, air conditioners and heat pumps, cooking or baking equipment and other apparatus, as follows: Rating in horsepower (HP) , kilowatts (KW) , kilo- volt-amperes (KVA) , or kilovolt-amperesreactive (KVAR) : Up to and including 1, each . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.00 Over 1 and not over 10 , each . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.00 Over 10 and not over 50 , each . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 .00 Over 50 and not over 100 , each . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 .00 Over 100 , each . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 .00 NOTE: 1. For equipment or appliances having more than one motor , transformer, heater, etc. , the sum of the combined ratings may be used. 4 Resolution No. 40-83 2. These fees include all switches, circuit breakers, contactors, thermostats, relays and other directly related control equipment. Signs, Outline Lighting and Marquees For signs, outline lighting systems or marquees supplied from one branch circuit, each 10.00 For additional branch circuits within the same sign, outline lighting system or marquee, each 2.00 Services For services of 600 volts or less and not over 200 amperes in rating, each . . . . . . 12.50 For services of 600 volts or less and over 200 amperes to 1000 amperes in rating, each . . . . . . 25.00 For services over 600 volts or over 1000 amperes in rating, each . . . . . . 50.00 Miscellaneous Apparatus, Conduits and Conductors For electrical apparatus, conduits and conductors for which a permit is required but for which no fee is herein set forth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.50 NOTE: This fee is not applicable when a fee is 'paid for one or more services, outlets, fixtures, appliances, power apparatus, busways, signs or other equipment. TABLE NO. 3 - MECHANICAL PERMITS 1. For the installation or relocation of each forced-air or gravity-type furnance or burner, including ducts and vents attached to such appliance, up to and including 100, 000 Btu/h . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.00 2. For the installation or relocation of each forced-air or gravity-type furnance or burner, including ducts and vents attached to such appliance over 100, 000 Btu/h . . . 7.50 3. For the installation or relocation of each floor furnace, including vent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.00 4. For the installation or relocation of each suspended heater , recessed wall heater , or floor-mounted unit heater . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.00 5. For the installation, relocation or replacement of each appliance vent installed and not included in an appliance permit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.00 5 Resolution No. 40-83 6. For the repair of, alteration of, or addition to each heating appliance, refrigeration unit, cooling unit, absorption unit, or each heating, cooling, absorption, or evaporative cooling system, including installation of con- trols regulated by the UMC 6.00 - 7. For the installation or relocation of each boiler or com- pressor to and including three horsepower , or each absorp- tion system to and including 100,000 Btu/h . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.00 8 . For the installation or relocation of each boiler or com- pressor over three horsepower to and including 15 horse- power , or each absorption system over 100 ,000 Btu/h and including 500,000 Btu/h . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . 11.00 9 . For the installation or relocation of each boiler or com- pressor over 15 horsepower to and including 30 horsepower, or each absorption system over 500 ,000 Btu/h to and in- cluding 1,000,000 Btu/h . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15.00 10. For the installation or relocation of each boiler or com- pressor over 30 horsepower to and including 50 horsepower , or for each absorption system over 1,000 ,000 Btu/h to and including, 1,750,000 Btu/h 22. 50 11. For the installation or relocation of each boiler or refrigeration compressor over 50 horsepower, or each absorption system over 1,750 ,000 Btu/h . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 . 50 12. For each air-handling unit to and including 10,000 cubic feet per minute, including ducts attached thereto . . . . . 4. 50 NOTE: This fee shall not apply to an air-handling unit which is a portion of a factory-assembled appliance, cooling unit, evaporative cooler or absorption unit for which a permit is required elsewhere in the UMC. 13. For each air-handling unit over 10,000 cfm 7. 50 14. For each evaporative cooler other than portable type . . 4. 50 15. For each ventilation fan connected to a single duct . . . 4. 50 16. For each ventilation system which is not a portion of any heating or air-conditioning system authorized by a permit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4. 50 17. For the installation of each hood which is served by me- chanical exhaust, including the ducts for such hood . . . 4.50 18. For the installation or relocation of each domestic-type incinerator . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7. 50 19. For the installation or relocation of each commercial or industrial-type incinerator . . . . . . . . . . 30.00 6 Resolution No. 40-83 20. For each appliance or piece of equipment regulated by this code but not classed in other appliance categories, or for which no other fee is listed herein 4. 50 TABLE NO. 4 - PLUMBING PERMITS 1. For each plumbing fixture or trap or set of fixtures on one trap (including water, drainage piping, and backflow protection therefor) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.00 2. For each building sewer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10.00 3. Rainwater systems-per drain (inside building) . . ... . . . . . 4.00 4. For each private sewage disposal system 30 .00 5. For each water heater and/or vent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5. 00 6. For each industrial waste pretreatment interceptor in- cluding its trap and vent, excepting kitchen-type grease interceptors functioning as fixture traps 8.00 7. For installation, alteration, or repair of water piping and/or water-treating equipment, each 2. 00 8. For repairoralteration of drainage or vent piping, each fixture • • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.00 9. For each lawn sprinkler system on any one meter, including backflow protection devices therefor 6.00 10. For atmospheric-type vacuum breakers not included in Item 2: 1 to 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.00 Over 5, each . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.00 11. For each backflow protective device other than atmos- pheric-type vacuum breakers: 2 inches and smaller . . . . . . 5.00 Over 2 inches . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10. 00 12. For each gas piping system of one to four outlets . . . . . 2. 00 13. For each gas piping system of five or more outlets, per outlet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 14. For each gas meter . . . . . . 12. 50 7 Resolution No. 40-83 TABLE NO. 5 - GRADING PERMITS 50 cubic yards or less . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10. 00 51 to 100 cubic yards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15.00 101 to 1000 cubic yards - $15.00 for the first 100 cubic yards plus $7 . 00 for each additional 100 cubic yards or fraction thereof. 1001 to 10 ,000 cubic yards - $78.00 for the first 1, 000 cubic yards, plus $6.00 for each additional 1,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof. 10,001 to 100 ,000 cubic yards - $132.00 for the first 10 ,000 cubic yards, plus $27 .00 for each additional 10,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof. 100,001 cubic yards or more - $375.00 for the first 100 ,000 cubic yards, plus $15.00 for each additional 10,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof. TABLE NO. 6 - SOLAR PERMITS For Collectors (including related piping and regulating devices) - Up to 1000 sq. ft. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.00 Between 1, 001 and 2, 000 sq. ft. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.00 More than 2,000 sq. ft. , $5.00 plus $1. 00 per 1000 sq. ft. or fraction thereof over 2,000 sq. ft. For Storage Tanks (including related piping and regulating devices) - Up to 750 gallons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2. 00 Between 751 and 2, 000 gallons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.00 More than 2, 000 gallons, $3. 00 plus $1. 00 per 1,000 or fraction thereof over 2,000 gallons For Rock Storage - Up to 1500 cu. ft. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2. 00 Between 1501 and 3000 cu. ft. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.00 More than 3000 cu. ft. , $3. 00 plus $1. 00 per 1000 cu. ft. or fraction thereof over 3000 cu. ft. For each appliance or piece of equipment for which no fee is listed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.00 8 Resolution No. 40-83 TABLE NO. 7 - SIGN PERMITS VALUATION PERMIT FEE $1. 00 to $500 .00 $10.00 $501.00 to $2,000 .00 $10. 00 for the first $500.00 plus $1. 50 for each additional $100 .00 or fraction thereof, to and includ- ing $2,000 .00 $2,001. 00 to $25,000.00 $32.50 for the first $2,000.00 plus $6. 00 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof, to and includ- ing $25,000.00 $25,001.00 to $50 , 000.00 $170 .50 for the first $25,000.00 plus $4. 50 for each additional $1,000 .00 or fraction thereof, to and including $50,000. 00 $50,001.00 to $100 , 000.00 $283. 00 for the first $50,000.00 plus $3. 00 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof, to and including $100 ,000. 00 $100 , 001. 00 and up $433.00 for the first $100,000.00 plus $2. 50 for each additional $1,000. 00 or fraction thereof TABLE NO. 8 - SWIMMING POOL PERMITS' For swimming pools and for spas and hot tubs not installed at the same time as a building or building addition: VALUATION PERMIT FEE $1. 00 to $500. 00 $10 . 00 $501.00 to $2, 000 .00 $10. 00 for the first $500. 00 plus $1.50 for each additional $100 .00 or fraction thereof, to and includ- ing $2,000 .00 $2, 001. 00 to $25, 000. 00 $32. 50 for the first $2, 000 .00 plus $6. 00 for each additional $1,000 . 00 or fraction thereof, to and includ- ing $25,000 .00 $25 ,001. 00 to $50 ,000 . 00 $170 . 50 for the first $25,000 . 00 plus $4. 50 for each additional $1,000 .00 or fraction thereof, to and including $50 ,000. 00 9 Resolution No. 40-83 $50, 001. 00 to $100 ,000 .00 $283.00 for the first $50 ,000.00 plus $3.00 for each additional $1,000 .00 or fraction thereof, to and including $100, 000. 00 $100,001. 00 and up $433. 00 for the first $100 ,000 .00 plus $2.50 for each additional $1,000 .00 or fraction thereof For spas and hot tubs installed at the same time as a building or building addition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20. 00 For swimming pool, spa and hot tub equipment, use Table Nos. 2, 3, 4 and 6 as appropriate. TABLE NO. 9 - RETAINING WALL PERMITS VALUATION PERMIT FEE $1. 00 to $500.00 $10.00 $501. 00 to $2,000 .00 $10 .00 for the first $500.00 plus $1. 50 for each additional $100.00 or fraction thereof, to and includ- ing $2, 000. 00 $2,001. 00 to $25 ,000.00 $32. 50 for the first $2,000 .00 plus $6. 00 for each additional $1,000. 00 or fraction thereof, to and includ- ing $25,000. 00 $25,001. 00 to $50 , 000.00 $170 .50 for the first $25,000.00 plus $4. 50 for each additional $1,000 .00 or fraction thereof, to and including $50 ,000 . 00 $50,001. 00 to $100 ,000 .00 $283. 00 for the first $50 ,000.00 plus $3. 00 for each additional $1,000 .00 or fraction thereof, to and including $100,000. 00 $100,001. 00 and up $433. 00 for the first $100 ,000 . 00 plus $2. 50 for each additional $1,000 .00 or fraction thereof TABLE NO. 10 - PLAN CHECKING For buildings or structures, signs, swimming pools or spas or hot tubs, and retaining walls: 65% of the permit fee as set forth in the appropriate Table 10 0 0 Resolution No. 40-83 . For buildings or structures, signs, swimming pools or spas or hot tubs, and retaining walls, which have standard plan approvals or approvals from other authorized agencies: $20. 00 or 65% of the permit fee as set forth in the appropriate Table, whichever is less For electrical, mechanical, plumbing and solar if plans are not checked in conjuction with buildings or structures to be constructed at the same time: 25% of the permit fees as set forth in the appropriate Table For grading plan checking: 50 cubic yards or less . . . . . . No fee 51 to 100 cubic yards 10.00 101 to 1000 cubic yards . . . . . . 15. 00 1001 to 10, 000 cubic yards 20. 00 10,001 to 100,000 cubic yards - $20 ,00 for the first 10,000 cubic yards, plus $10, 00 for each additional 10,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof. 100 ,001 to 200, 000 cubic yards - $110. 00 for the first 100 , 000 cubic yards, plus $6 . 00 for each additional 10 ,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof'. 200 ,001 cubic yards or more - $170 .00 for the first 200 ,000 cubic yards, plus $3.00 for each additional 10,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof. For additional plan checking required by changes, additions, or revisions to approved plans: $15. 00 per hour , with a half-hour minimum charge TABLE NO. 11 - MISCELLANEOUS FEES Demolition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30.00 NOTE: Fee shall be waived by building official if building to be demolished is used for practice drills by Fire Department. Compliance Survey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 .00 Building Relocation 350 . 00 Mobilehome (other than temporary dwelling) 200 .00 Temporary Dwelling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 . 00 11 0 0 Resolution No. 40-83 Permit Issuance. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Each permit. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10.00 Each supplemental permit. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3. 00 Inspections outside of normal business hours (two hour minimum charge) 15.00/hr Reinspection (per Administrative Code Section) . . . . . . . . 15.00/ea Inspections for which no fee is indicated (one-half hour minimum charge) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15. 00/hr Replacement of inspection record card . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10. 00 Replacement of job copy of approved plans . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15.00 Cross-connection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (225.00 deposit with unused portion, less 25.00 , to to be retained by City for its cost, based on actual cost billing by Health Department to be returned to the permittee) Driveway Encroachment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . 20.00 App7TTOO Board of Appeals 250.00 City Council . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130 .00 Investigation Fee (for work commenced without permit. . . Equal to permit fee re- quired by this Res- olution NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the fees set forth in this Resolution shall take effect on the effective date of Ordinance No. 70. On motion by Councilman and seconded by Councilman , the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following vote: AYES: NOES : ABSENT: ADOPTED: 12 Resolution No. 40-83 MARJORIE R. MACKEY, Mayor ATTEST: BARBARA NORRIS, City Clerk APPROVED AS T ORM: A . ALLEN GRIMES, City Attorney APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: MURRAY L. WARDEN, City Manager A 13