The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda Packet 05/23/1983 AGENDA - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting May 23, 1983 7:30 p.m. Atascadero Administration Building, Call to Order Pledge of Allegiance Invocation Roll Call Public Comment City Council Comments A. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Item A, Consent Calendar, are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion in the form listed below. There will be no separate discussion of these items. If dis- cussion is required, that item will be removed from the Consent Calen- dar and will be considered separately. Vote may be by roll call. 1. Minutes of the regular meeting of May 9 , 1983 (RECOMMEND AP- PROVAL) • 2. Minutes of the regular adjourned meeting of May 10, 1983 (RECOMMEND APPROVAL) 3. Amendment to San Luis Obispo County and Cities Area Planning Coordinating Council Joint Powers Agreement (RECOMMEND AP PROVAL) 4. Bid for Alvord Field Lighting, Bid No. 83-4 (RECOMMEND BID BE AWARDED TO M K CONSTRUCTORS IN THE AMOUNT OF $30,935) 5. Bid for Fire Department roof repair (RECOMMEND BID BE AWARDED TO EVANS ROOFING IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,920) 6. Tentative Tract Map AT 820802:1, between Highway 41 (Morro Road) and San Marcos Road south of the present terminus of Vista Road; Langford and Ibsen Enterprises (Daniel J. Stew- art) ; to divide 123.85 acres of land into 31 lots (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) 7. Tentative Parcel Map AT '810305:1; Palo Verde Road; William Fortington; to extend the time allowed to complete require ments for an approved tentative map (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) 8. Tentative Parcel Map AT 830311:1; 3100 and 3150 Ardilla Road; Gordon T. Davis (Twin Cities Engineering) to allow division • of two parcels totaling 18.83 acres into four parcels (RECOM- MEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) -' ATASCADERO CITY COUi ,..L - AGENDA D MAY 23, 19 8 42. 9 . Tentative Parcel Map AT 830310 :1; 7150 Sombrilla Avenue; Terry Hulsebus (Daniel J. Stewart) ; to allow division of 1.04 acres into two parcels (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COM- MISSION RECOMMENDATION) 10 . Acceptance of Parcel Map AT 820917 :1; 4785 Traffic Way; Frank Scicchitano/Steve Pascel (Twin Cities Engineering) (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) 11. Acceptance of Lot Line Adjustment LA 821014 :2; 11805 Santa Lucia Road; James Rockstad (Twin Cities Engineering) (RECOM- MEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) 12. Acceptance of Lot Line Adjustment LA 821014 :1; 11465 and 11505 Santa Lucia Road; James Rockstad (Twin Cities Engineer- ing) (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDA- TION) B. HEARINGS, APPEARANCES AND REPORTS 1. Public hearing on Title 9 (Zoning Regulations) and City-wide Rezoning Program - Final Public Hearing C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Capital Improvement Plan/Administration Building Renovation/- Police Facility • 2. Ordinance No. 66 amending Falcon Cable TV franchise by ex- tending area of service zone - second reading 3. Ordinance No. 67 relating to claims against the City - second reading 4. Consideration of Pismo Beach resolution expressing opposition to language entitled "Compromise between National League of Cities and National Cable Television Association on Federal Cable Legislation" 5. Sand and gravel mining in the Salinas River - Sycamore Road Pit D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Resolution No. 25-83 regarding off-shore oil drilling 2. Cross-connection control procedure; Resolution No. 23-83 es- tablishing fees 3. Resolution No. 24-83 declaring weeds a public nuisance and commencing proceedings for the abatement of said nuisances 4. Action by San Luis Obispo County and Cities Area Planning and* Coordinating Council concerning the San Luis Obispo/Atasca- dero bus route 2 fi6 • MENTO RAND UM TO: Murray FROM: Larry McPherson SUBJECT: Fire Department Re-Roof - Bid No. 83-5 DATE: May 18, 1983 Recommendation It is recommended that City Council accept the low bid for the subject project submitted by Evans Roofing, Atascadero, in the amount of $3,920. Bids received are as follows: Evans Roofing $3,920 • Fred Ball Roofing 4,060 Background This is an emergency repair and therefore funds for this project will need to come from Contingency Reserves. Bids received are consistant with the estimate. /,eAWRENCE McPHERSON LM:vh • o rrr � 0 - n -dm G ro rC/) O w w Z n o (D O x C '0 �- r o w 0 '0 CD CD w OWC w m o u� w �r � o 1. Om CL N n o r• o p `'' CD z n r� K 0 w n e o D i rt CD J (Dv0 N LnV A G. on H- (D a 0 H n , n a O nrt 0 O� • m m > n w w f- F-., Fl t n ON C� o 110 1 00 a d w CD 10 n 's o U '00 'l:� rt r O M Z r• n rr F-6 0 c td r d 0 7Z a n d rt y� r-t —� r-r C) CD oUl y v rt W O Q C O o �. In oo Ln �o ri CD Ln rn w a 0 0 0 vn r t C-) (D CD a r -o o• � rt CD r. CD N r✓ O CD --h CD • M E M O R A N D U M TO: Murray FROM: Larry McPherson SUBJECT: Alvord Field Lighting - Bid No. 83-4 DATE: May 17, 1983 Recommendation It is recommended that City Council accept the low bid for the subject project submitted by M, K Constructors, P.O. Box 14, Muscatine, Iowa 52761, in the amount of $30,935. Background The Engineer's estimate for this project was $32,000. Funds for this • project will be taken out of Contingency Reserves, to be reimbursed by the State on approximately August 15th. The attached bid spread sheet shows the results of the bids received. tAl ENCE MCPHERSON LM:vh att. • M E M O R A N D U M TO: CITY MANAGER May 17, 1983 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP AT 820802:1 LOCATION: Between Highway 41 (Morro Road) and San Marcos Road south of the present terminus of Vista Road (Ptn. of Lot 46, Block 40) APPLICANT: Langford and Ibsen Enterprises (Daniel J. Stewart) REQUEST: To divide 123.85 acres of land into 31 lots ranging in size from 1. 01 acres to 20 .10 acres. On May 17, 1983 , the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the land division request unanimously approving the application subject to Conditions 1-26 as listed in the attached; Staff Report. There was only brief discussion among the Commission. Daniel Stewart, representing the applicant, appeared and indicated his agreement with the recommended conditions. No one else appeared on the matter. LAWRENCE STEVENS bgrRRAYWARDEN Planning Director ity M nager Ps • M E M O R A N D U M • i TO: PLANNING COMMISSION May 16, 1983 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: Tentative Tract Map AT 820802 :1/Langford and Ibsen Ent. This matter was continued from the meeting of April 18, 1983 at the request of the applicant. Staff met with Dan Stewart on May 5 to dis- cuss the matter . As a result, several of the conditions in the at- tached Staff Report (#lc, ld, le, 2, 4, 9a, 10, 15 and 24) were re- vised. It should, however, be noted that these revisions do not re- solve all disagreements on the conditions - especially Condition #1 which requires reduction of the number of lots requested. It should be noted that Staff' s primary concern is that there be a feasible building site on each lot being created and that any revisions recom- mended are with that concern in mind. Attached is a letter from Mr. Stewart on the aforementioned meeting. J. 40v 44w LAWRENCE STEVENS Planning Director Ps �ei� rrr rirt�', CITY OF ATASCADERO , 1918 [ ;^ 1979 Planning Department April 18, 1983 May 16, 1983 (Revised) STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP AT 820802:1 LOCATION: Between Highway 41 (Morro Road) and San Marcos Road south of the present terminus of Vista Road (Portion of Lot 46 , Block 40) APPLICANT: Langford and Ibsen Enterprises (Stewart) REQUEST: To divide 123.85 acres of land into 31 lots ranging in size from 1.O1 acres to 20.10 acres. BACKGROUND 1. Zoning: RPD-4 2. General Plan: Suburban Single Family Residential 3. Environmental Determination: An Environmental Impact Report has been previously certified for this site in association with Zone Change 2801107 :1. 4. Site Conditions: The site is comprised of hilly terrain with num- erous drainage swales, a pond, lowland and natural vegetation con- sisting of dense oak stands, scrub oak, chapparral and grasses. One drainage swale from San Marcos Road runs eastward between pro- posed Lots 1 and 2 located at the southwest corner of the site and drains into the pond between proposed parcels 13 and 14 in the central portion of the site. This swale continues beyond the man- made pond to low lying ground. Another steeper swale runs north- easterly from San Marcos Road between the boundaries of proposed Parcels 6 and 7, and 6 and 8. This swale empties into a low lying swamplike area at the present terminus of Vista Road.- A second, small seasonal pond is located at the easternmost corner of Lot 15. Slopes throughout the site range from 10% to 108%. A jeep trailer is located at the southwesterly corner of the site at San Marcos Road and runs along the southerly property line approxi- mately 1500 feet before turning northeast into the central part of the site. A second jeep trail runs through the lower portion of the site across proposed Lots 19, 18 , 20, 21, 22 and off the site to the east. Vegetation generally consists of natural grasses and chapparral on the upper half of the site and dense stands of oak trees on the lower half. Rock outcrops appear thoughout the site. Tentative Tract Map AT 820802:1 (Langford &Ibsen Ent..) 5. Project Description: The applicant proposes to divide his 123. 85 acres of land into 31 lots ranging in size from 1.01 acres to 20 .01 acres. The RPD-4 zoning (Rural Planned Development 4 acre average lot size) - allows the applicant to create lots which vary in size but do not go beyond the maximum density of one unit per four acres. The applicant desires to construct the site in three phases. Phase I is composed of the eight lots (1 through 8) fronting on San Marcos road ranging in size from 1.01 acres to 1. 40 acres. Phase II is composed of lots 9 through 16 and lots 26 through 31 (14 lots) ranging in size from 1.34 acres to 3 . 50 acres. Phase III is composed of the remaining lots 17 through 25 ranging in size from 3.03 acres to 20 .10 acres. For Phase I development, the applicant proposes relocating the jeep trail on lot 1 to follow a more uniform grade to San Marcos Road by connecting the road through to lot 2. Both lots would then use this as driveway access improved to a 16 foot width. A 30 foot easement would be reserved over the same drive for emergency egress when Phase II develops. Access to lot 5 is proposed along that lot' s southern property line which is 10 feet from the steep- est swale on the site. This driveway would require fill and pro- tection of the swale. Access to lot 6 is via a wooden bridge over the swale or installation of a culvert with graded fill. Lot 7 is accessible directly from San Marcos Road but limited in depth due to the nearness of the swale forming the rear property linea Due to the depth, the applicant is requesting a 15 foot front setback in lieu of the required 25 foot front setback for lot 7. All other Phase I lots access directly on to San Marcos Road. Phase II development would include the extension of Vista Road through the lowland at the northern edge of the property on to the site with a temporary cul-de-sac constructed at the inter- section of lots 26, 27 and the frontage of lot 16 . Temporary emergency egress is to be provided from this cul-de-sac back to San Marcos Road through the easement between lots 15 and 16 to the jeep trail realignment on lot 1. Phase III would extend Vista Road to a new cul-de-sac at the intersection of lots 22, 23 and 24. All Phase II and III lots would access directly from Vista Road. Permanent emergency egress from the end of Vista Road is to be provided by an easement running between lots 22 and 23 to the Evans' property (Parcel 1 of 24/PM/65) and on to Morro Road. BACKGROUND On Thursday, September 9, 1982, the Subdivision Review Board met with the applicant, Mr. Langford and his engineer , Dan Stewart to discuss the proposed project. Also attending were: Larry Stevens, Planning Director; Mike Hicks, Fire Chief; Kami Griffin, Planning Intern; Jim Wentzel, Planning Commissioner ; and Fred Buss, Associate Planner. The following items of concern were discussed: 1. Need to review the written agreement on road improvement of San Marcos Road before any further processing takes place. 2. Verification of the site size to determine density. 2 Tentative Tract Map AT 820802:1 (Langford &Ibsen Ent. ) 3. Review of lots in the field with the applicants' engineer to check building sites, access and septic suitability. 4. Adjustment of access to Lot 1 to eliminate the easement. 5. Possibility of eliminating the smaller water impoundment area. 6. Bridge access to Lot 6 must meet County standards. 7. If all water impoundment areas are to be retained, improvement drawings will need to be included with the road improvement drawings. 8. Building pads, drives and access grades will not be required until grading plans are submitted. 9. Improvement phasing as discussed is adequate. 10. Show emergency access road on plans for Phases I and II. 11. Fire hydrants in Phases II and III shall not exceed 800 feet apart. 12. Provide documentation for emergency access of the end of the cul- de-sac in Phase III with grant of easement and crash gate. 13. Standard brush clearance standards shall be mandated for all structures. 14. The Fire Department requests participation in a radio repater for the top of San Marcos Road. 15 . City Engineer ' s requirements as per his letter in the Environmen- tal Impact Report. The applicants' engineer has informed Staff that Phases II and III are to be combined and developed at the same time. The reason given is the cost involved with construction of Vista Road at two different times. Staff has a number of concerns related to this design proposal in- cluding slopes (grading) , geology and soils (erosion and septic sys- tems) , aesthetics (landscaping and erosion) , and traffic (circula- tion and safety services) . These points were adequately brought out in the Environmental Impact Report (E. I.R. ) . The Manual of Septic Tank Practice and the Uniform Plumbing Code establish setbacks for leach fields from natural watercourses of 50 feet and 100 feet from water impoundment areas. There are also additional setback require- ments from lot lines (5 feet) and structures (20 feet) . In addition, the Basin Plan may eve-ntually establish even greater setbacks for pri- vate sewage disposal system. The E. I.R. has identified topographic and percolation problems on this site and advises a mitigation mea- sure of requiring a minimum 200% expansion area for all leach fields as a design standard for all lots. Staff is concerned that develop- ment on some of the proposed lots would require so much engineering 3 Tentative Tract Map AT 820802 :1 (Langford &Ibsen Ent. ) that it would degrade other environmentally sensitive factors in order to construct dwellings. The E. I.R. notes that one of the - irreversible impacts that cannot be mitigated is excessive cut and fill causing substantial loss of on- site scenic character, potential erosion and a high possibility of failure of fill areas. The E. I.R. also identifies the impact of building on slopes greater than 20% which would require extensive grading, a long term negative impact. The mitigation measure identi- fied is to restrict single family building sites to areas less than 20% in grade. Staff recommends that a number of lots be redesigned by reducing the number of lots from 31 to 25 ensuring that an adequate building site is available on each without setback adjustments. The primary concern in recommending redesign of and reduction in the number of lots re- lates to private sewage disposal system constraints. Adjustment of Vista Road around certain rock outcroppings and trees will be required. The engineer has agreed that this should be done. Vista Road will require extensive grading to construct since most of the Phase II and III area is in 30% or more slope. Road grades must be limited to 15% or less as noted in the E. I.R. to allow fire fight- ing equipment and other vehicles the ability to access the develop- ment and nearby wildland. Road development will also require improve- ment plans for continued use of the water impound areas. Along with this, a second major access out of the 3-F Meadows area is important. Staff recommends that this project not be allowed to develop or that the Final Map not be permitted to record until such time as San Mar- cos/Los Altos Roads are completed to Morro Road. This concurs with the current City Council policy on lot splits in the 3-F Meadows region. The applicant has provided conditional approval of the use of the ex- isting roadway through the Evans' property (Parcel 1, 24/PM/65) to Morro Road as an emergency exit from the site when Phase III is com- plete. The egress will be for emergency purposes only and be located off the final cul-de-sac running between Lots 22 and 23 connecting to the road on the Evans' lot. A crash gate will be located at the com- mon boundary. FINDINGS 1. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the 1980 Atascadero General Plan and with applicable zoning and subdivision regulations. 2. Modifications to the proposed subdivision design and its improve- ments are necessary to assure consistency with the General Plan and with mitigation measures identified in the Final Environmental Impact Report. 0 4 Tentative Tract Map AT 820802:1 (Langford &Ibsen Ent. ) 3. The 123 acre site is physically suitable for a single family resi- dential subdivision but its density is only physically suitable if modified as recommended. L 4. The subdivision design and improvements are not likely to cause environmental damage or public health problems. 5. Existing easements of record are not adversely affected by the proposed design. 6. Mitigation measures identified in the Final Environmental Impact Report are appropriate and necessary for incorporation into recom- mended conditions of approval. 7. Participation in area-wide circulation improvements are essential to accommodate traffic which will be generated by the project. Conditional approval of this subdivision together with existing private agreements will ensure completion of San Marcos and Los Altos Roads to Highway 41 eliminating the cul-de-sac effect in the upper 3-F Meadows area. RECOMMENDATION Based upon the above Findings, the Planning Department recommends ap- proval of Tentative Tract Map AT 820802:1 subject to the following conditions: 1. The proposed subdivision design shall be revised to conform with the following: a. Lots 1,2, and 3 shall be redesigned into two parcels. b. Lots 6,7, and 8 shall be redesigned into two parcels. C. Lots 9 and 10 may be required to be redesigned into one par- cel, if engineering measures proposed in conjunction with the development of Vista Road do not adequately eliminate poor drainage conditions on Lot 9. d. Lots 29,30 , and 31 may be required to be redesigned into two parcels, if engineering measures proposed in conjunction with the development of Vista Road do not adequately eliminate poor drainage conditions on Lot 31. e. Lot 14 shall be eliminated and merged with one or more adja- cent parcels unless one of the two ponds are eliminated. f. Design revisions set forth in a.-e. above shall be subject to final approval by the Planning Department and shall comply with other criteria set forth in this approval concerning building site, private sewage disposal system, grading and 5 Tentative Tract Map AT 820802 :1 (Langford &Ibsen Ent. ) road improvement designs. Revision may be referred to the Planning Commission for final approval if deemed necessary by the Planning Director or if requested by the applicant. 2. Private sewage disposal systems will be an acceptable method of sewage disposal if reports and designs are acceptable. All tests, reports and designs shall conform to methods and guidelines pre- scribed by the Manual of Septic Tank Practice and other applicable City ordinances. The following Note shall appear on the Final Map: "Appropriate soils reports including a percolation test, a test to determine the presence of ground water, and a log of a soil boring to a minimum depth of ten (10) feet shall be submitted to the Planning Department prior to the issuance of a building permit. Where soils reports indicate that conventional soil absorption systems are not acceptable, City approval of plans for an alter- native private sewage disposal system, designed by a Registered Civil Engineer, shall be required. Depending upon the system, more restrictive requirements may be imposed. All tests, borings, and designs, including structure locations and septic system lo- cations shall be located inside the delineated building sites shown on the plan delineating feasible building sites on file in the Planning Department. " 3. Private sewage disposal system design shall also comply with the following, which shall be shown as a Note on the Final Map. The Planning Director may modify these requirements, upon recommenda- tion of the design engineer, where deemed appropriate for individ- ual system designs. a. Expansion area for the leach field shall be 200%. b. Provide a minimum twenty (20) feet of horizontal separation between the bottom of the trench and surface exposure for conventional systems. C. Provide a minimum setback of fifty (50) feet from drainage swales and of one hundred (100) feet from water impoundment areas (unless impounded water is used for domestic purposes) . More restrictive setbacks may be required if the Basin Plan or applicable City ordinances establish them prior to devel- opment of individual sites. 4. Water shall be obtained from the Atascadero Mutual Water Company and water lines shall exist at the frontage of all parcels prior to recordation of the Final Map. 5. All utilities, including electricity and telephone, shall be placed underground and shall exist at the frontage of all parcels prior to recordation of the Final Map. Any utility . easements shall be indicated on the Final Map. 6 Tentative Tract Map AT 820802 :1 (Langford &Ibsen Ent. ) 6. Vista Road shall be fully improved with a minimum paved width of twenty (20) feet including adequate shoulders to City standards to the frontage of Lot 23. 1 a. Improvement plan drawings, prepared by a registered civil engineer, shall be submitted to and be approved by the Public Works Department. The applicant shall enter into an inspec- tion agreement and secure any required permits prior to con- structing road improvements. b. Final road grade shall not exceed 15%. If multiple Final Maps are to be recorded for this project, plan and profile drawings, prepared by a registered civil engineer, shall be submitted to and approved by the Public Works Department prior to recordation of any Final Maps to assure that final road grades can comply with this standard. C. The alignment of Vista Road shall minimize removal of major topograhic features including trees and rock outcroppings. Any such features to be removed shall be indicated on im- provement plan drawings. d. Improvement plan drawings shall delineate measures to pro- tect road improvements from any water impoundment areas. e. Drainage and erosion control plans, prepared by a registered civil engineer, shall be submitted to and approved by the Public Works Department in conjunction with improvement plan drawings. f. Dedication of Vista Road shall be made on the Final Map. The width of the road dedication shall be adjusted as needed to accommodate cuts and fills and slopes related thereto. g. Soil reports, prepared by a registered civil engineer, and/or geologist, shall be provided to the Public Works Department where deemed necessary to adequately review improvement plan drawings. 7. Plan and profile drawings of proposed individual driveways shall be submitted for approval to the Planning Department in order to determine average grade and appropriate improvement requirements. If average slope exceeds 12%, paved improvement would be required at the time of application for building permit. Otherwise, an all-weather surface would be required similarly. In no event will driveways be allowed which exceed 20% in slope. The driveway access shall be improved to a minimum width of twelve (12) feet where it serves only one residence and sixteen (16) feet where it serves two or more residences. All driveways shall have a mini- mum unobstructed vertical clearance of fourteen (14) feet. In the event of shared driveways, improvement of the shared portions shall be a requirement made in conjunction with the first building permit. If a bridge is necessary to provide access to a lot, it shall be designed by a registered civil engineer for a load capa- city of 35,000 pounds. 7 Tentative Tract Map AT 820802 :1 (Langford &Ibsen Ent. ) 8 . Drainage and erosion control plans, prepared by a registered civil engineer , shall be submitted for review and approval to the Plan- ning Department prior to issuance of building Permits in conjunc- tion with installation of private driveways, access easements, and structures. 9. A plan delineating a feasible building site or sites for each lot in compliance with the following shall be submitted to the Plan- ning Department prior to recordation of any Final Map: a. Building sites shall generally be limited to areas of 20% grade or less, for conventional slab-on-grade construction. b. Building sites shall conform to setback requirements of the zoning and building ordinances, including those required for private sewage disposal systems. C. Building sites shall contain sufficient area for private sew- age disposal systems, including expansion area. d. Building sites shall be accessible by driveways with less than 20% grade. e. A minimum of one such building site in conformance with the above, as well as other conditions set forth in this approv- al, shall be available on each proposed lot. If a site is not available, the lot design may be required to be revised to provide one. f. The following Note shall appear on the Final Map: "A plan delineating a feasible building site for each lot is on file in the Planning Department. Construction may be limited to these sites by the Planning Department when re- viewing individual building permit applications. " 10. Efforts shall be made to minimize grading that would be disruptive to the natural topography and removal of existing mature trees. The following shall appear as a Note on the Final Map: "No trees shall be removed without compliance with applicable City ordinances. No grading shall commence without an appropriate per- mit and compliance with applicable City ordinances. No cuts shall be made which exceed five (5) feet in height, unless authorized by the Planning Director . " 11. All grading shall conform to Chapter 70 of the Uniform Building Code. All cut and fill slopes shall be adequate to allow for establishment of vegetation. Particular attention shall be given to drainage control in conjunction with any grading. 12. Development of lots located within identified oak woodland areas shall be given particular attention to minimizing unnecessary tree removal. 8 Tentative Tract Map AT 820802 :1 (Langford &Ibsen Ent. ) 13. Final grading and drainage plans, prepared by a registered civil engineer, for development on each parcel, shall be required to be submitted for review and approval to the Planning Department prior to issuance of building permits. A Note to this effect shall ap- pear on the Final Map. 14. Roof materials for all structures shall be Class C rating or bet- ter and a Note to that effect shall appear on the Final Map. 15. An easement shall be secured to provide an emergency fire access through Parcel 1 of CO 76-509 . This easement shall be improved to a minimum width of ten (10) feet, to an all-weather condition, and with adequate provision for drainage. It shall be maintained in a passable condition especially during the summer fire season. 16. Fire hydrants of a type and size specified by the Fire Department shall be installed along Vista Road extension. Hydrants shall be installed at distances no greater than 800 feet on center. Exact location and manner of placement shall be subject to the approval of the Fire Department. A letter from the Fire Department certi- fying the installation of the hydrants shall be received by the Planning Department prior to the recordation of the Final Map. 17. Drainage swales shall be indicated on the Final Map and a Note shall appear on the Final Map which states: "Any modification of the ground during site development within fifty (50) feet of the drainage swales shall be subject to ap- proval by the Planning Department. " 18. All pipeline and other easements of record shall be shown on the Final Map. A letter shall be submitted from each utility company indicating the nature and extent of any building restrictions. A Note so stating such restrictions shall appear on the Final Map. 19 . The applicant shall contribute 500 of the cost of a radio repeater for the Fire and Police Department communications systems. 20. In the event that archeological resources are discovered on the subject site during construction of this project, said resources are to remain undisturbed after discovery and construction acti- vity shall cease immediately. The Planning Department is to be notified so that proper disposition of the resources may be ac- complished. Construction may resume only upon authorization by the Planning Department. 21. The Final Map shall not be permitted to record until such time as the road improvements of San Marcos Road and Los Altos Road are complete and installed to Morro Road (Highway 41) . 22. A final soils or geologic report shall be prepared and submitted prior to recordation of any Final Map. 9 Tentative Tract Map AT 820802:1 (Langford &Ibsen Ent. ) 23. All conditions of approval are to be complied with prior to filing of the Final Map unless otherwise specified herein. If multiple Final Maps are submitted to accommodate the proposed phasing, then the Planning Director shall determine which conditions are to be complied with for each phase. 24. A covenant shall be recorded with each lot indicating that no further land divisions of any lot created by this Tract Map, in- cluding multiple phases of this Tract Map (if any) , shall be al- lowed unless planned development zoning regulations affecting the entire 123 acre parent parcel are changed. 25. A Final Map in compliance with all conditions set forth herein shall be submitted for review and approval in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City Land Division Ordinances prior to recordation. a. Monuments shall be set at all new property corners and a Reg- istered Civil Engineer or licensed land surveyor shall sub- mit a letter certifying that the monuments have been set prior to recordation, unless certification is received that corners are already monumented. b. A recently updated preliminary Title Report shall be submit- ted for review in conjunction with the processing of the Final Map. 26 . Approval of this Tentative Tract Map shall expire two years from the date of this approval unless an extension of time is granted pursuant to a written request prior to the expiration date. a. If multiple Final Maps are recorded, all such maps shall be recorded with these time limits or any extensions thereof. b. If recordation of Final Maps does not proceed beyond the first phase, then any consideration of new land division ap- plications for remaining land of later phases shall not be granted without consideration of densities allowed in the first phase of the planned development. A Note this effect shall appear on any Final Maps for all but the last phase. NOTE: COPIES OF THE EIR SHOULD BE REVIEWED IN CONSIDERING THIS APPLICATION. CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT IF YOU NEED ANOTHER COPY. 10 Tentative Tract Map AT 820802 :1 (Langford &Ibsen Ent. ) ACTION The Planning Commission should, by motion, direct Staff as deemed appropriate. REPORT PREPARED BY: FRED USS Ass ciate Planner REPORT APPROVED BY: LAWRENCE STEVENS Planning Director 11 x DIEL J. STEWART & ASICC. r & ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS A�j , Post Office Box 2038 Post Office Box 687 597 Twelfth Street 4450 fl Camino Real Paso Robles, CA 93446 Atascadero, CA 93423 (805) 238-0700 z (805) 466-5717 May 9, 1983 City of Atascadero Planning Department City Hall Atascadero, CA. 93422 Re : Langford & Ibsen Tract 1060 Ptn Lot 46 Block 40 San Marcos - Vista Road Gentlemen: This letter is in response to the "Staff Report" for this project dated April 18, 1983 and per our meeting on May 5, 1983. Your recommendation 1 States that numerous parcels are to be merged to eliminate 6 lots down to a total in the project of 25 lots (Avg site of 4. 95 acres) . The rezoining that was granted on this property allows the average size of the lots to be 4 acres . Item la: Lot 1 has a jeep trail from San Marcos Road to the proposed extension of Vista Road,. We propose to realign this trail so that it follows the contours around the hill and would permit an adegaute building site near the Southwest ling of lot 1 at the top of the hill . The proposed area for sewage disposal would be more than 100 feet from the "swale" . Lots 2, 3,4 , and 5 have excellent building sites and sufficient area for sewage disposal systems . Item lb : Lot 6 provides an excellent site and because of topography the configuration should remain as shown on the tentative map. Lots 7 and 8 have always presented some problems if combined the total size would be large and the area shown as lot 7 would become an isolated portion of the lot . I still believe that these 2 lots should remain as 2 lots . DANIEL J. STEWART &*SOC., ENGINEERS & SUR ORS May 9, 1983 Page 2 Re : Lanfond & Ibsen Tract 1060 Item lc : Lot 9 has a drainage problem that will be taken care of during the second phase of this project . The low-lying swampy area will require channelization of the swale and its flow controlled to Vista Road extension, and directed under Vista Road to the natural channel traversing along the northerly line of Lots 30, 31. By resolving this problem lots 9 and. 18 will be excellent sites with adequate area for sewage disposal systems . Item ld: These are excellent building sites and adequate area for sewage disposal systems . The existing pond and swale is mainly on the contiguous system. Item le : The apparent concern.. for. this seres. of lots. is. the existing pond. In order to keep these lots we will eliminate the pond completely and install a culvert under Vista Road to reopen up the channel. Item 15 : The private easement through the Evans property was to be for emergency egress only and not to be a standard driveway for all to use. Please delete this condition completly or alleviate the driveway Standards . Item 16 : Fire hydrants are to be installed in Phase 2 and to be conditioned upon that map. Please consider these comments at your earliest convience so that clarification can be determined at the Planning Commission meeting. Very truly yours , r DANIEL J . STEWART, R. C .E. DJSlh r . • M E M O R A N D U M i i TO: CITY IIA14AGER May 17, 1983 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP AT 810305 :1 LOCATION: Palo Verde Road (Ptn. Lot 7 , Block 95) APPLICANT: William Fortington REQUEST: To extend the time allowed to complete requirements for an approved tentative map. On May 16, 1983, the Planning Commission reviewed the subject matter and unanimously approved a time extension to May 11, 1984. There was no discussion as the request was scheduled as a Consent Calendar item. No one appeared on the matter. a�� rcvw i�� LAWRENCE STEVENS MUPyAAY L ARDEN Planning Director City Manager Ps r �„�, CITY OF ATASCADERO 1911 1979 • u d liiP 8 n r j- CADI Planning Department May 16, 1983 STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP AT 810305:1 LOCATION: Palo Verde Road (Ptn. Lot 7, Block 95) APPLICANT: William Fortington REQUEST: To extend the time allowed to complete requirements for an approved tentative map. BACKGROUND 1. Existing Zoning: A-1-B-V-5 2. General Plan: Suburban Single Family Residential 3. Site Conditions: The topography varies across the site with slopes ranging from 10% and less near Palo Verde Road, to 30% and greater near the southwesterly edge of the property. The site is • heavily wooded, with the upper third covered in chaparral. A trailer, shed and 50 gallon per minute well exist on the proposed Parcel A. Access to Parcel A is a dirt driveway off of Palo Verde Road. Some of the surrounding parcels are developed with standard single family dwellings. City sewer and water are not available. 4. Project Description: The applicant is requesting a one year time extension for filing a final parcel map for a land division of 12 acres to create two parcels of six acres each. This is the sec- ond and final such request that the law allows. STAFF COMMENTS On May 11, 1983 the City Council approved Tentative Parcel Map AT 810305 :1. On June 10, 1982 the Subdivision Review Board met to review the first time extension and indicated that there was no reason not to grant the time extension (which was granted on June 28, 1982) . On May 3, 1983 Staff discussed the second time extension request with the applicant and indicated that this would be the final time extension that could be granted under the current lot division ordinance. Re: Tentative Parcel Map AT 810305 :1 (Fortington) RECOMMENDATION The Planning Department recommends approval of the time extension sub- ject to the conditions set forth at the time the project was origi- nally approved. Approval of this one year time extension shall expire at 5 :00 p.m. on May 11, 1984. ACTION The Planning Commission should, by motion, direct Staff as deemed appropriate. REPORT PREPARED BY: RED BUSS Associate Planner REPORT APPROVED BY: fam-'6� LAWRENCE STEVENS Planning Director Ps r I t„ 2 'i ®e a a It vs \ m 0 tL U � I M ry a) " � eiezcl 13 m I! SII � L I. a II go a-, ,fes •`Wftftft CL i " W ■ ow IN LL m 2 t a cn _ 31 atuw co Ini - # ih I I - I 29A 6 3 Is 19 s p 20 is a � � 21 15 20 5 21 16 (� 4 M � ORS® 1 s e4 iT 60 18 1 19 5 2® A-1 - BV- 5 6 q 21 3 _ C `�f 2 ►� f 2✓ri/'%L� r7�� ; f1 -/U1305-V - 1 D•� �� .�3c,Y 9�f e -To A .36 67.40/A e_ -MAIL BoyE5 mcr � RvDA MANDY �kovs j� OPEN RED &AT'E �/b CrAL3R��K `t FoRT►NbTv Qd�-- WHITS S �At I�fir ATE i ys, � lyf - I 00 - °'o 74 ul VI Q r 1 1 • 4 JA. ku LZ vi ti ,^ cli Qh� 7 z. z ¢ z J f o \ Z o .9,�r•q� Lj I Fr. v m • , D M E M 0 RAN D U M TO: CITY MANAGER May 17, 1983 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJ§ST: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP AT 830311:1 LOCATIRN: 3100 and 3150 Ardilla Road (Lots 7,8 , Block 25) { APPLICAtNT: Gordon T. Davis (Twin Cities Engineering) v REQgE�T: To allow division of two parcels totaling 18.83 acres into Y,s` four parcels of 4.7 acres each. On May _ki,, 1983 , the Planning Commission conducted a ,public hearing on _ the suVect matter unanimously approving the land division subject to s Condit ia�s 1-16 as listed in the attached Staff Report. There,, s only brief discussion among the Commission. Chary p�5M�,iller, adjacent property owner , expressed some concern over his wakter line that is on Mr. Davis' property. John ..�ejaly, representing the applicant, appeared and indicated his concurr nce with the recommended conditions. No one else appeared on the matter. LAWRENCE STEVENS MU Y L WARDEN Planning Director CA-y Ma ager Ps n eAI t7 P 11 r rr 1918q {r, 1979 l � F CITY OF ATASCADERO LAID �. Planning Department May 16 , 1983 STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP AT 830311:1 LOCATION: 3100 and 3150 Ardilla Road (Lots 7,8 , Block 25) APPLICANT: Gordon T. Davis (Twin Cities Engineering) REQUEST: To allow division of two parcels totaling 18.83 acres into four parcels of 4.7 acres each. BACKGROUND 1. Existing Zoning: A-1-BV-3-D(508) 2. General Plan: Suburban Single Family Residential 3. Environmental Determination: The applicant has completed an Ini- tial Study Environmental Description form. The Planning Director has prepared a draft Conditional Negative Declaration indicating the project will not have any significant adverse impacts upon the environment if certain mitigation measures are incorporated into the project. 4. Site Conditions: The site is located on the side of a hill. The lots are heavily covered with oak trees and natural grasses. Average slope is 30%. Power lines cross the property diagonally from a point close to the intersection of the lots and Ardilla Road toward the southwest corner of Lot 7 . Ardilla Road is unimproved. 5. Project Description: The applicant requests permission to divide his two lots totaling 18. 83 acres into four equal lots of approxi- mately 4. 7 acres each. The division would entail installation of Ardilla Road which is currently a dirt driveway. STAFF COMMENTS On April 7, 1983 the Subdivision Review Board met with the applicant' s engineer, John Kennaly. Also in attendance were: Larry Stevens, Planning Director ; Mike Hicks, Fire Chief; Wayne LaPrade, Planning 0 Commissioner ; Patsy West, Senior Engineering Technician; Kami Griffin and Greg Fuz, Planning Interns; and Fred Buss, Associate Planner. The following items were discussed: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP AT 830311:1 (Davis) 1) Need better indication of lot corners in the field. 2. Indicate the location of the trees in the right-of-way. 3. Frontage improvements will be required including water lines and a fire hydrant. The current zoning on the lots is A-1-BV-3 which is a slope-deter- minant, variable, minimum lot size zone. Actual average slope using the contour measurement method is 29.91%. The BV-3 zoning establishes a 4 1/2 acre minimum lot size for the 25-30% slope range. Review of the five criteria used to determine minimum lot size in the proposed RS zoning indicates a minimum lot size of 4.6 acres. In either case, the size requested is less than the required minimum. FINDINGS 1. The application as submitted complies with applicable zoning and subdivision regulations and conforms with the 1980 Atascadero Gen- eral Plan. 2. The project as submitted will not have a significant adverse effect upon the environment and the preparation of an Environmen- tal Impact Report is not necessary. RECOMMENDATION Based upon the above Findings, the Planning Department recommends: A) Issuance of a Conditional Negative Declaration as follows: 1. Adequate provision shall be made for draiange and erosion control and protection in conjunction with road and site development. 2. Grading and tree removal shall be minimized; during all phases of road and site development. 3. Adequate provision shall be made to minimize fire hazards in conjunction with site development. 4. Adequate and sufficient tests shall be performed on each lot to ensure septic suitability at each building site; and, B) Approval of Tentative Parcel Map AT 830311 :1 subject to the fol- lowing conditions: • 1. Private sewage disposal systems will be an acceptable method of sewage disposal if reports and designs are acceptable. All tests, reports and designs shall conform to methods and guidelines prescribed by the Manual of Septic Tank Practice • -3- TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP AT 830311:1 (Davis) and other applicable City ordinances. The following Note shall appear on the Final=Map: "Appropriate soils reports including a percolation test, a test to determine the presence ofgroundwater, and a log of a soil boring to a minimum depth of ten (10) feet shall be submitted to the Planning Department prior to the issuance of a building permit. Where soils reports indicate that conven- tional soil absorption systems are not acceptable, City ap- proval of plans for an alternative private sewage disposal system, designed by a Registered Civil Engineer , shall be required. Depending upon the system, more restrictive re- quirements may be imposed. " 2. Water shall be obtained from the Atascadero Mutual Water Com- pany and water lines shall exist at the frontage of all par- cels prior to filing of the Final Map. 3. All other available utilities not already in place shall be extended underground to each parcel frontage at the time of building permit. Any utility easements are to be shown on the Final Map. 4. Efforts shall be made to minimize grading that would be dis- ruptive to the natural topography and removal of existing, mature trees. The following shall appear as a Note on the Final Map: "No trees shall be removed without compliance with applicable City ordinances. No grading shall commence without an appro- priate permit and compliance with applicable City ordinances. 5. Drainage and erosion control plans, prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer, shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Department prior to issuance of building permits in conjunction with installation of private driveways, ac- cess easement or buildings. 6. Plan and profile drawings of proposed individual driveway(s) and driveway easements shall be submitted for approval by the Public Works and Planning Departments in order to determine average grade and appropriate improvement requirements. If average slope exceeds 12%, paved improvement would be a re- quirement at the time of application for a building permit. Otherwise, an all-weather surface would be required similar- ly. In no event will driveways be allowed which exceed 20% in slope. The driveway access shall be improved to a minimum width of twelve (12) feet and shall have a minimum unobstruc- ted vertical clearance of fourteen (14) feet. Notes to these effects shall appear on the Final Map. 7. Roof materials for all structures shall be Class C rating or better and a Note to that effect shall appear on the Final Map. 0 -4- s TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP AT 830311:1 (Davis) 8. All pipelines and other easements of record shall be shown on the Final Map. A letter shall be submitted from each utility company indicating the nature and extent of any building re- strictions. A Note stating any such restrictions shall ap- pear on the Final Map. 9. Drainage swales shall be indicated on the Final Map and a Note so shall appear on the Final Map which states: "Any modification of the ground during site development with- in fifty (50) feet of the drainage swales shall be subject to approval by the Planning and Public Works Departments. " 10. Two fire hydrants of a type and size specified by the City Fire Department shall be installed by the applicant along the frontage of the parcels. Exact location and manner of place- ment shall be subject to the approval of the Fire Department. A letter from the Fire Department certifying the installation of the hydrants shall be received by the Planning Department prior to recordation of the Final Map. 11. Ardilla Road shall be constructed along the frontage of the property to City standards including a minimum paved width of twenty (20) feet with three (3) feet of graded shoulder on each side of the paving prior to recordation of the Final Map. a. Improvements to be constructed under an inspection .agreement and encroachment permit issued by the Public Works Department. b. Improvement drawings, including improvements to control grading and erosion within the road right-of-way, shall be submitted to the Public Works Department for review and approval. 12. Ardilla Road, between the subject property and the improved section of Ardilla Road, shall be improved with an all- weather surface. Said improvement is to be maintained by the property owner (s) . 13. An offer of dedication to the public for road purposes for twenty (20) feet along Ardilla Road for the entire property frontage shall be shown on the Final Map and be made by cer- tificate thereon. 14. All conditions herein specified shall be complied with prior to filing of the Final Map. 15 . A Final Map in compliance with all conditions set forth here- in shall be submitted for review and approval in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City Lot Division Ordi- nance prior to recordation. • -5- 0 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP AT 830311 :1 (Davis) a. Monuments shall a 1 be set at all new property corners cre- ated and a Registered Civil Engineer shall or licensed land surveyor shall submit a letter certifying that the monuments have been set prior to recordation of the Final Map. b. A recently updated preliminary title report shall be submitted for review in conjunction with the processing of the Final Map. 16. Approval of this Tentative Parcel Map shall expire two years from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted pursuant to a written request prior to the expira- tion date. ACTION The Planning Commission should, by motion, direct Staff as deemed appropriate. REPORT PREPARED BY• F D BUSS USS Planner REPORT APPROVED BY: ZXWVt4 ZJ" LAWRENCE STEVENS Planning Director Ps A-l-Z''12 A-I-2%2 RA-13-D-i.p r A-3-� s A-►-a-V 5 F S I T t A- -a-v-5 s i A-r-B-✓-5 . zotiiNG P7_F3o3 i i 1 ux'Vis1 —WIA/ CiTl ,�- {-a-v-5 -3100 3iso 4"iu.4 /_ors 7d'�, B�ac� Zs— ' -T \ 19 13 It 1 10 9 8 i i fi 9 �� i �t \�J t7 e y d 7 (19. 19 t911 !15 J 4 ,I l 43 ,� 18a n b i� 14 3 `2 15 / 5 12 �� % / 1 n j tab 18C 7 26 16 / ( 12 a33Ila M7 �� 8 a tte / 4 13 t1 i 10 - 1 X55 17 22 r 33 23/ 24 a 12 3 Q 14 25 2 Bit 16 3 0 / 1921 1 '�30A i 31 a az FZ9 23 I J -30 7 ��, /e io , 2 2q / I \ 31 R 30 ` �21 1727 29a 18 /16 �6 28 19 29 19 20 15 1 �' 20 8 d 34 �� 41 14/ \ 1 /19 / 13 11 10 9 , 21 22 28 �s 40 23 �a 6 2 / 20 ' C ,- J �37 3 2c ' 15j / 21 �5�25 /22/ 6 f 26 27 3a a Z3 � 15 17 / Z3 a4 25' 26 27 27ai 28 5 4 - x� ,ea ^3\ 3 8 `t�,I 14 16\ ' ) i 2 i 3 1 15 r 31 1 25 e2 9 13 14 / 32 33 34 35 36 37 10 18 13 S ITE E ! _ NOA V I 5 101/1'0 II��/ 19 12 II 10 g ' 8 ,7 6 c ` A 27 2 39 4 t i 3 20 7 4 t 4 28 3 2 38 I ' i 2. � <� 36 12 26 22 24 �� f I 34 35 10 ` 23 / 26 2� t 28 1 29 30 31 32 33 0 P \4\ 25 .\ 14 ` /1 18 28 \x24 / `��\� 6 > \ 15 4 \ 13 f;.2 9 / i II 10 7 \ / 17 `��23 �. 14 8 II 10 16 ��/:/ 19 29 16 16 � s zo / 13 12 21 \� 28 \ o0 30 21 20 O�� 17 /16 22 23 24 25 26 31 19 18 47 _---- 15 L ANO 18 17--/ 32 34 21 20 19 ; 16 15 14 18 x-24 OV/-k/ 39 � � 13/12 /! / -� �T�30?// : / �. /Tft 5 D/9 V15 J`WiN tr't Tl/:5 ei JCF diIE.�/�lA�i� � -q� ,� o 3/00�3/.r6 /��o/ccA ,P v 37 _36 35 134( 33 32 -43 C c rs 7 c P �cacic�s 3 2 t SrtN/ 39 ' Oi �� i 29 28 � 52 a�b 141 /42 43 27 26 �q 51 t tl tn44 /r/45 �. 25 9 50 i i t I i - - -- - - - ROb s� 990 � __. __. . \ •\\\ !-_- `l �o t•�_ \\ --- .ice � \ •\ C> a �0- D �p • M E M O R A N D U M i TO: CITY MANAGER May 17, 1983 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP AT 830310 :1 LOCATION: 7150 Sombrilla Avenue (Lot 16 , Block E) APPLICANT: Terry Hulsebus (Daniel J. Stewart) REQUEST: To allow division of 1.04 acres into two parcels of . 51 and . 53 acres each. On May 2, 1983, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the subject matter unanimously adopting Findings 1-3 as listed in the attached Staff Report and denying the two-way land division request. SThere was discussion among the Commission concerning a swimming pool and pool house on the site as being an accessory use on one of the proposed parcels. It was noted that if the division were allowed, the two uses would be nonconforming because of the location. No one appeared on the matter. LAWRENCE STEVENSU Y WARDEN Planning Director City Manager Ps r/ R efn I �. r.h r • r,rX979 \ CITY OF ATASCADERO 19�s G r j c. \ � Planning Department May 2, 1983 STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP AT 830310:1 LOCATION: 7105 Sombrilla Avenue (Lot 16, Block E) APPLICANT: Terry Hulsebus (Daniel J. Stewart) REQUEST: To allow division of 1. 04 acres into two parcels of . 51 and .53 acres each. BACKGROUND 1. Existing Zoning: R-A 2. General Plan: High Density Single Family Residential 3. Environmental Determination: The applicant has completed an Initial Study Environmental Description Form. The Planning Di- rector has prepared a Draft Negative Declaration indicating the project will not have any significant adverse impacts upon the environment if certain mitigation measures are incorporated into the project. 4. Site Conditions: The lot contains a single family residence on proposed Parcel 2 and a swimming pool with pump house and solar panels on proposed Parcel 1. Average slope of the lot is a 25% grade. The swimming pool and house have been graded into the hillside at two different elevations with the pool above the house. A retaining wall of six to eight feet separates the house and pool. A circular paved driveway serves the residence from the frontage corners of Sombrilla Avenue. The remainder of the lot is covered in natural grasses. 5. Project Description: The applicant requests permission to divide his 1.04 acre parcel into two parcels of . 53 and . 51 acres each. The single family residence would be located on proposed Parcel 2 and the swimming pool would be located on proposed Parcel 1. Ac- cess to proposed Parcel 1 is over an easement along the northwest property line of proposed Parcel 2. Tentative Parcel Ma T 830310 :1 Hulsebus P ( ) STAFF COMMENTS On Thursday, April 7 , 1983 , the Subdivision Review Board met with the applicant' s engineer, Daniel J., Stewart. Also in attendance were: Larry Stevens, Planning Director ; Mike Hicks, Fire Chief; Patsy West, Senior Engineering Technician; Wayne LaPrade, Planning Commissioner; Kami Griffin and Greg Fuz, Planning Interns; and Fred Buss, Associate Planner. The following items of concern were discussed: 1. Easement along northwest property will serve lot behind Quail Ridge in Hotel Tract. 2. Swimming pool may not be on separate parcel without main building. 3. In-lieu sewer connection fees. Staff' s main concern is the swimming pool which is an accessory use and building (pool house) for which there would be no main building if the lot is permitted to split. The definition of accessory buildings states. . . . "a detached subordinate building, the use of which is inci- dental to that of a main building on the same lot. " The definition of accessory uses states. . . . "a use accessory to any permitted use and customarily a part thereof, which use is clearly incidental and sec- ondary to the permitted use and which does not change the character thereof. " These definitions clearly indicate that there may not be an accessory use (pool) or accessory building (pool house) on a lot with- out a permitted main use or building (residence in this case) . Fur- thermore, if the division were allowed, the pool and pool house would be nonconforming due to their location. FINDINGS 1. The lot division application as submitted does not conform to applicable zoning regulations with regard to accessory structures and uses on lots without permissible main buildings. 2. A swimming pool is not a permitted main structure in the residen- tial zone. 3. The pool and pool house would be nonconforming due to their loca- tion in the required front yard. RECOMMENDATION Based upon the above Findings, the Planning Department recommends denial of Tentative Parcel Map AT 830310 :1. 2 Tentative Parcel Ma AT 830310 :1 Hulsebus ACTION The Planning Commission should, by motion, direct Staff as deemed appropriate. REPORT PREPARED BY: FRZ5 BUSS Associate Planner REPORT APPROVED BY: laAV'W LAWRENCE STEVENS Planning Director Ps 3 -•� v� / Now IS d s � f y r \ t� •t � as c 9 2� I JA y- 77 341 �i 1 15 14 - 2 13 7 rI3 �_� ' 4 J `�I 7 �_ 3 T 1 7 �/ ! 11 V 5 t2 1 ♦ 2 � 1 5 6 7 'g 9 10 \ 9 I I I 2 1 8 til 59 58 2 i 57 I 1 3g 42 ! 14 87 8 3 12 t 60 D 56 { 5 4 � 2 _� � 171 3 j0�1 5� 43 'S32 CT 62 7 �N,2 I T Q ® 63 17_ Ips 1tzv 19 G l 2{222 j y _ 28 l , ✓I�JI C_ I Ig Ig 4 I6 g 15 14 13 12 11 t0 29 µ �fr?t`�� •11 2 ,� 5 7 9 �@ 2�2 n 16111 13i ;.f IIA 9 �' '/, 3 61A 20 �{ �f 7 g/5 60 618 2 =7 7 6 �S 4 12 lei r 9 2J A 1 1 14 72 2 j1 11 Ida 10 12 3 g J / /3 1 11 12 N 9 @ r !13 1 2 . _ y/GA4WA Y 4 31211 sJa 7 1 P -- 6 7 13 12 � 0 9 g 5 4 7 �.�-�1 5 4/ 16 i 11 8 i 03t 32 34 15 3 B 5 2 8 a � � 9��11 8 6 3 I y 1 25 €I' 9 ' 14 1'-- A P /44A 728 2 I 25 14 1 tl 1 2 g 6 109 6 f L 9 O, Z 5 26 4 3 2of 2) r2.2 24 ID 9 8 7 6 5_ ��`La 2712 ! 1 2 1, 16 2743 t 4 g I / "'" 17 16 15 14i f 3'12 ~�13 1 15 7 0 3} lc{ /i le a 13/gt2 li 4� V � 10 i t 3 i� p is x 25 \ 17 17 15 7 rJ D b 3 4 16 y7 3 t 16 15 14 '4 �LaJ 4 4. 14 1 18 19 2 22328 �t 5 1�" IGI ,B X031 3\1 -� ib 14 5 � 11 9 8 264 5 tl 13 12 N NCS � 615{4 �12 � 1j2 201 10 3 g '"i 4� 1 � 1 1010 b 1 t0 918 a l 54 q5 T(1 51 31 q 7 - 7-0 10 9 2 y4 3 1 e 10 4 . j 18 It 7 3 2 66 2 \I / 1, 1: �/ IC o 68 1� 61 3 51y f It 16 r i F 2344 Z92 ` 4 13 I 157 4 25 3 O 5 / \ } / 13 2 IZ 66 62 /( 14 ` 222 3 26 2 13 ° t0 6` 63 1 Iz g 61 b a° j1 9 A�oGA��N G1,6 4 9 l/ OV-70-3 f U% r B 8 44 12 qd 9�` 3 7 41, f�ucsE6us`�T�6✓AKT - i3 9 7 5 40 4 4 7 3 615 4 7/05- f'Oirl,se�LLf) Af�E• 43 ea / 3 5a 2 16 G cr , 3cecK V14 � 7 n � -s--~- 4 32 IeI,Q� /4 3 Q+.�/=e�` / 6 �\ 4_w 4 e2 ' a 1k 360 A C / O €L PARK i r Alt I .u•ao a .aaso' 0-5 7 O C Jill • A6 • M E M O R A N D U M TO: CITY MANAGER May 17, 1983 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF PARCEL MAP AT 820917:1 (Tract No. 1085) LOCATION: 4785 Traffic Way (Ptn. of Block N) APPLICANT: Frank Scicchitano/Steve Pascel (Twin Cities Engineering) On November 8, 1982, the City Council approved tentative Parcel Map AT 820917 :1 allowing an air-space condominium subdivision of an exist- ing industrial building, subject to certain conditions and in concur- rence with the recommendation of the Planning Commission. The zoning is M-1 and the General Plan Designation is Light Indus- trial. Staff review has determined that all conditions of approval have been met. On May 16, 1983, the Planning Commission reviewed the matter on its Consent Calendar and recommended acceptance of the Final Map. LAWRENCE STEVENS R_TPAAY V*g'WARDEN Planning Director Ci y Maer Ps • �L . _-W 1 S-�a '-7.'d PI XO No a _ _ by C2o2/ —�' �' - . — �L. t.' jr�r� ?�- - -1- _ .(� {yam_ i3..=-• y ,,,:L-.,.. OS t ° G7 t _ ?- s :� i w .^.;� _w�x�os:�_, N�:*, . : :W.,2 00/M i /eS9 S' .�. IS t. � -�� ) �,�- __.- --+ c r� r '- _ . -� + - �� V} - o Cv - - • r. L. V { i j.. is - T _ ` A\ ':r. 1' -�i{- - •t E -(1 -r v b �iiL r a r tv i ih - r p v o2 -16 vp JC s;+ .a - - la2.. it> L t s ✓+. •1 _ ,W,9 < SIF [ r :- - a Q - (` {_ t... v, y p� �. r�i=: 4 •K aL :' `C - t ftp- "ai I .1 ,. 1. I I i ` t I� I -s�y� _ Y y 4 -1 1 O is G: °n A, .}._:_ TNN >< ' �_ .fX1'9fi'::y �. �N- O ! L...f`a f >r<NN 29624. OOZE I NN„ T 'N , al 1 ice_ t O '.- ,Y _I l- O F .-x F •� `3�, a� `N Q `N -:. _ �p Q r 1 4 .f3 - V Q `�ki P i•"M 6 A•+r '/' % ..O_I 4N- 714y lz� - r - t N P "x. - a 6 C O 3 v l NN._+,.F"-w x ' r((��,-� sY yr z --' ' �t7. yip :-_' FF�,. °�� p • Y ��_.x ._.i1'" �v. S . -x. -s..+�-� - 'r, p r _:r -a-.+Ll+maw. CS .?a O-. .'ti Q! t; r. T, _ T vJ /te a 4 �00"p-.Li t�Y � '�O� �1.` W oast �� ,; 3� <: 41. c:y icy'-- e>, :-1V„ -_. �y t! -� p tiP,u .3:._I -4�°' l� ��` .3K, - - y O f _V C r,O O \ -i .- ..i-y --,-4- .-:6 „-1-r`• l --V i ,v..- Qom„ -_r O a VO t� r`'V 1�`f "3_: ?_ � \ O _ ..1_ .. .. ei- a >•a..��C O ..u- L- ••� f s -_ u .z d -. l y'-a >�. --,h,.:<�;: ,,- �' V j -t16%bo//cog/I � ss * � :(� _ i_x �--� _ -009E po/ e�ipap. z r�ti2" : �%F :f!_.�j g I we �, v - _ -iib e.y -wY } s.'1 3-_ -+.� hk F T{�� '" .SX }g Y ^.;a" i ii Cb p .t pi .-g '� 1't',f +ne+'. y _ '3 v- s �'. K 'r -.+. 9 y t .f - .i qzs :- v ? ii,r -T V' "^ Va- Q' " - +mss + 1 I it-_,w]", , :fir.+- K.n rte::�.:wsi-(,�,! �/00�_ =r� ��.(�Y o�'9 N a2:�-:(�Sr+.f.,..t7.�. .�- } _ r«Y ! .;-"ti .. _ ,Syr /�e, ^...K r Y '-'S:. O 000x/ ��op L✓N ._tet 4� : ,i t .Y � x 7 }-i S i_-v 1 77 �, M 71 6 D - �„ p✓o�a/ lr�iPby // {sa��i% a/': �L t �,t E - ��/j7 .a t / 3.' i# nU f....-...--___.._....�w.f-a_..:'_'....�•f_ ._. -._ls _-,X ±...:,�.T_.'! aw�:(.f._,E•3� _.� 1 _ �C� ��'7JY �� x 4 .i- NC: ' r t': "" 'A5; ii-K,:+.. 1-..-ASF f .a. R r t -.s..r z - :� .. 2 �tN✓�d 4�. .-- O .� _-1 } '7 .sem' .0 I -L -R .G Y =t 1 Y... !'�'�" 3 " �Qi ?.•{ F : l .c f 1 `_.. •._ � (_!~ y Y '_.1 Z•h. ..��/IN�SI//, /�- J3 1 :: r T .t s r 4 d'^- t t _ 4 O ! .�."` c1 '^' oo�� O✓ _ __N p ;` ' _ • -! f010 t N N 7 s ?a... t - :� ��(� ., . ��-!.*�t �1� - X�!_:!�"L: 0 L'.-_;I";-� -- ,-,.��Z-- ..W 6�" ,a �!_".�,,_i-.-.,:. ) - ,, , � ,�,e I- — - , , - - , , �-_.� -��,,_'. �;..'�, ,'�3.1 a�7—..,m-i". � -.,,.t;-' a_. . --xt.o.T_ t.. t, - - - .�'_,� - r kms - --1.-, . _ 6sJ r.�/z Gx -� LT' .t .i%. v-,_--`-��.,�j,!.�_,w— . i"'- s i'.Jy = y--ice...--,;,-,.-,�v.---�� .. .,;�-f- .-,. . - j,QCzi .�; j i x - _ - ..+•"`tom _ 3,.i.c... - '-^r "� �- b V V^ H ,r. t L. n \ � �C _ ..� .,- end _ �� as _ •u,►toys se;'Si/,' a fnq 002 .1 09 �{ d <.3 vl to s 2 " pow uo 6a/ao se Fsrn ✓ate S —t2 ��._.__-. _._. _.t�;.4).COcl'. `� .. ,._ _ .. .. ., .-... - (�: cit CJ — _ - 0 • M E M O R A N D U M z , TO: CITY MANAGER May 17, 1983 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT LA 821014 :2 LOCATION: 11805 Santa Lucia Road (Lot 3, Block 57) APPLICANT: James Rockstad (Twin Cities Engineering) On December 13, 1982, the City Council approved tentative Lot Line Adjustment LA 821014 :2 adjusting an existing lot line to create better building sites, subject to certain conditions and in concurrence with the recommendation of the Planning Commission. The zoning is A-1-BV-5 and the General Plan Designation is Suburban • Single Family Residential. Staff review has determined that all con- ditions of approval have been met. On May 16, 1983 , the Planning Com- mission reviewed the matter on its Consent Calendar and recommended acceptance of the Final Map. Atro LAWRENCE STEVENS MU RAY WARDEN Planning Director City Manager Ps AWES17 7herr ex�'sf cerloin a1 driveways are sabjecf lb P/on�ir� .° !A(/orkS Gkpo1-11774'171 oporova/t�f�i of�iibi�y,cYrinif. coscrrcnts af�ccfin9 r 2.No 6ai/di7gS Orsevfie sys/erns sho/fbc o/%sled krifhin the fYoodrazy. 1917 easemenf/o Oscar c 3 /U6`flees shall be -elvmea' mifhovf complli ee Ger�9effc �i//ey1' /�/c tvifh apphwhle lily ol-ai1-lal7ces. Ab groodn9 s/W/ Col)mence WYIIi V,11 a17 a00%oriofe per1-nif o�d _. comp/rirrxc turl`h ooP/rcob/e C'rfy ord�onccs - , L _ �. SAA17, LUC/A � g �QOAD r a - - fix =N36°48:�6'lti_ 359.4/' 30488'.t7 '; 25453 A T PARCEL A WCEL B 2.77 acres n 271 acres (�•V �. A'tiC_h..ahwe`.sYo-.�.+ , - N3. ]�4� NO �, = �'*-"'. izr "- ^^•s,. - +�cy;+r ,�'^ . - �..n.<.'�s�LY. TIM :. c 'S' •c -,�_?"ts-3'"'t§'+is " a-c�__�.- r.; r�T b +."5 £r a NZ '.`="'c�"'�G.•.+�" � �"�^"""--- �..+.............. -- 7,Sswx�.«..��-.� �...:. .._ .m.'` i� .�.....+.:, ,_..<.Vii:: r .,, ...4 • ti LEGEND p /noica/es sef//2.,rcbor e cap - SCo%: /"50' 'RCE 20?44." �✓ r�,J �.fi� r� • fndco>es �`a11nd cao "RCE 20244",on, le,. So /00 /so M. /ndcofes 1-neasaled `J - R, f17dcafes 1-�eee-ordclj//rey in dress �' 6rooh�Sco%in Fce> .o R2 /nd�afes recordcer 33/�°iY!//sl. -_ BAS/S Of Bfi9/�/NG T/7e 1701-117 fife 01'/of 8,oer �Pemm'o/,Qrrrvey in,oroq�css. /E�ll/3G'°48:36'YT/ . M E M O R A N D U M TO: CITY MANAGER ; May 17, 1983 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT LA 821014 :1 LOCATION: 11465 and 11505 Santa Lucia Road (Lots 12,13 , Block 42) APPLICANT: James Rockstad (Twin Cities Engineering) On December 13, 1982, the City Council approved tentative Lot Line Adjustment LA 821014 :1 adjusting an existing lot line to create better building sites, subject to certain conditions and in concurrence with the recommendation of the Planning Commission. The zoning is A-1-BV-5 and the General Plan Designation is Suburban • Single Family Residential. Staff review has determined that all con- ditions of approval have been met. On May 16, 1983, the Planning Com- mission reviewed the matter on its Consent Calendar and recommended acceptance of the Final Map. LAWRENCE STEVENS M RRAY . WARDEN Planning Director City Manager ps . • :-,, �.!' rv `�` � q'a`F`� �7¢firm\K .s.j t• 'X"^'x'+t ^••i..?seJC�ii35s- y. d,� Zf�e"`• dcdrr -s i-w+r.-t�„y •'� yg •. "T c -+� € is� .T�,''� `� a � f r 3a'S""t.. �` .Fr �a'�` 'S'i'"'�^a*' •`-+.,,hty r f . .�,..�'� Y44ir.,.,-qt"•.;�'1 r �2 af+lyl c•'Y.�i.-,ya est' ..f a�R^3,^t�'.6 2L"Ya.r rn r',.s.5 y� xf,L r '-r{ .+:�sa!'�,r. .•y ,a•as.. a ¢.i'-t;; r ,:.' F:.� >zt j--�3r+.-<.;y 1G' s"`.¢:93 �Ek,,-.,,.r �� hz��'�sr��i�'sZiv��,r nre�rk'a�:,, r'l= r�,-,.x a_n'C{..u .�„ r-.a h`t.',a -r.,�"..._f�� .-rl,..�k � +.4a_.c 2' `� � .:#w..;iL.�i•,`�'^�s.�=��°�tiA�Cv o\ `'o`r�\l A F d # nr \ e p\ C.o� oCu3 vo0 Yg s \ vpQ� t�t*r r •:,�, .': �f 6 �,. ��C��C�C.jQ $`l vo ��otrnyQ3 J359./7 tp•+b.�°s�E\.C�a \ \�, \ v e0 ' 25� ,t/43°38 93 VV�O�� Qk Q 6 � iQQ{r"fai�C a�t'`fF cS 4a 433T'r '` . ;r �, i •.a " Q oacy��3vQo� / � `.� �>� � max#fir { q ' 3xt t3ai rY € p 1 5 vuy oy0v a ( b� o� � G3�.� 1 =a r p'e� V$�. \ �� a'e � `•+V Q l 0� th ' — r {' a pT tT L,,.p�. ,t t - � � � A-0, �3�C: �r v, p.v: a `�pt•� t poi V 1VI \ �.0a V.h�.tiS\�� '03 'ti Q•e� iuk� ti a a "' v rs 34 - I Ly�'•ti j iF (U � ti V C�'�V � 3x•�a , N �k .&iyr 1t' •ti ` fir,r` } : + r � 'Y§ •x- hl N AC�V�-�ys� ''• � � \��'� ` ° l9 t� r.` -a {sr � r a C y a0 t'V` _ aC- • �Oli �%at � C�bO�n\V C ,,,..g�. � � 6•.. r'a •'! �d ' F r xd,{ � k i � .. Y i ��:,: tt �r �•-T .1 •_i � S - �O O y �., as o us�i�' � ��m�a � �` � ,, � a� }}} ,.,� 1 �g5f�is { �`• .�. E � ,�f. t tt �I ''t} i / i,.. � , lt �= cOt, OV \h ! x t ' i O t 4t O .e '� •C O:Y \• d as x"i.N?• a¢°,r {. t� Rt '§:'� �t f£{4,�•€ tf t ti AAy S�t a 1 a1. � �, ��1 z S�s 3 IY�:, L•7 � ra..s Q ��`O Q p?� C•lQ'�• , �r.� z<� a , ,�. Y+ V � # tr� �,, jt� ;�2 ltaw�s 0��' ��. , ^s, V a'hVaanC Vj Ql .v� � v,r\.�� I r ��i•� ',W +4' �t, Yz K.V r: as "� � � y �. Lj 4S �. a �t .,', .°\� o y� u C on + ri � �;a R t , g Q� v; �t� rpt�, a_ =<t ��•3?a� + 1 ,€ � � Q C •.O°�y O.� •� �i�,��J ��v'h ', t°` 4 e g -` �i�1( -�a DQ ,v y�t er, �s g , E ds F' � �c 3 e.: Si r o h p•p•e° L"C \ `A.t a�.r T >tj 3'� { �' +fya a,� tia ;tr3� t " f1,�1qa 1 € s s TtrJ-t.T ,i �� (t; f a `p! 6yz{ t „' tl• 17 Stt 4 ' ,ate 4rk M at (:r - ti� J/• 4/6 ) �8%/` NS � R- �i �,� - �fl fi• i f� !r, i.iY ? ter t :....y Q=� �:2 ---'4 t Fes* d - - t" )d,/8�9•l5" 2.6�` b y�� asY [d tr y is r ,tt +_ ftlla. Q r 4 N1 �`• ; -' f afrFK t yt 3,: a.O!Iry , �,. i.gQ.l ' / 3//60 a y aj£� 4pP r ti `�• / i .T!y i)<:4aa I._�'.` �� q r"p lift, l r��i � W p7xr � 4 } 8 ( �k` W V tc � t ,t;+ kf 'f h. e we A 7 .Y y� 3 frr{Lp�is�t �y y �f �' `l E a • °ty 3 limy C1O S �6P } F * �° It,tin ` p%K i O '#4} r, M S* i'{' +>+}}(�ape. Q_:�5 f n: 1' .I t;la{Q}� p• `�•$,` H V N L �" F+o 1 c 2.,�'i Q O rg '' e e ,cz'�si,u 1 k^s��M '`)"r''t��.� ��t7��. Q e�� t)1/€ " a� I-�� l"� •4� v. ,�.' } # � t,,, gin( .,3t r � 3,�,�C f �a � 1 � u f i qt V�!•b t � \r � €: ;� v� 1 � t. ti�ir'�+'.Y t I ( � r � ti t >. T �E;��l� ��.�: )g�.a' � \b °or• •,r' d h p s x j 9{}g{i 'w : S ,,11 rk' . O C 4' +' J + �ti` � r•°-}� n3} a 3!'f t � $) if C � '� �ere�'t ,� �t\ V' � p• � \ �' . "'� �;. T�•; �c t'�4;�k+ � a �"_}�.�, f ( � Tz ,�y ftiV\ J 7a�T \ l�tu:r '� ' t �� \/% O +rN ?),[;K t t Frit fi a. 3 1 1T'✓ +rN O� C OY,•- to p� � ,. i'. IN St.z� i "i,.X� p V.a.V �a z �l1\ 01��.'• ��'�t v .r � :ham •� •. 5;:. fiRtJ• '.k i'� H C � . 3� �'t`!`: n j .,� l�Ti s� � \:L�C e,-; JV �a �) .•" W :. 3 4 `O i ` ' t J-1z A a v ¢ \�V 4 W t 1 t�� e{F- ,� �•aT. ✓. v � e ^t� �+JrLi Ali `�O b\ ns• ...,: S+ �T �. u. `moi a}j T `;`� L• _ .-; ..•. .�. e` Y: r� V trO(.,.pgt..�-�h tri,.. � �b;`��f�xr�: - fli .1 _ 3-1 n s On t ' itr� a;at tEY t ;.. «} :ff• t_'t.a M. �cc- •s r3 i M E M O R A N D U M TO: City Council FROM: City Manager SUBJECT: Final Public Hearing on Zoning Ordinance DATE: May 18, 1983 The attached materials are in additional to material pre- viously distributed. Please bring all of the zoning ordinance materials you received previously including amendments, maps, etc. , since this will be the last public hearing prior to the first reading of the ordinance which should include all changes suggested to date, including Monday' s meeting. I understand there will be some issues raised, such as the attached letter concerning the Herrmann matter which was con- sidered by the Planning Commission with actions as noted by the Planning Director. The exception provision has been included per your request and your action tonight should be to formally close the hearing and direct Staff to return with first reading of the final ordinance on June 13 , 1983. MURAY WARDEN MLW:AD M E M O R A N D U M TO: CITY MANAGER May 17 , 1983 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: Public Hearing on Title 9 (Zoning Regulations) and Citywide Rezoning Program At the request of the City Attorney, this matter was continued to May 23 with the first reading of the ordinance tentatively set for June 13 . The Planning Commission recommendation is as set forth in the previous memorandum dated May 3, 1983. On May 9 the City Council agreed with the Planning Commission recom- mendation except as follows: 1) Page 3-17, Line 776 - deleted " (j) Farm Animal Raising (See Section 9-6.112) " as a Conditional Use in the LSF Zone 2) Page 6-16, Line 849 - deleted reference to LSF Zone in farm animal standards 3) Page 1-9, Line 461. 02 - add section on special exceptions subject to Planning Commission and City Council approval Revised pages to accomplish the above, as well as the other changes approved by the Commission and Council, are attached. These replace pages in Title 9, as previously distributed, and are also part of Ex- hibit A-1 of the adopting ordinance. Two revised pages of the zoning maps are also provided. These replace maps previously distributed and are part of Exhibit B-1 of the adopt- ing ordinance. The adopting ordinance also includes Exhibits A-2 and B-2 which are summaries for the newpaper publication of the ordinance.* It has been estimated that the cost of publishing the full text of the ordinance would be $4000-5000. The 1000 scale map which is Exhibit B-2 will cost approximately $800. 00 to publish. If it is desired to publish the entire text, a transfer from reserves may be needed, unless publi- cation occurs in the next fiscal year. In the latter case, the budget would have to be increased to cover this extraordinary cost. I am also concerned about the inclusion of the special exception pro- visions within the zoning regulations. The attached memorandum dated May 16 discusses those concerns. 46 Re: Public hearing on Title 9 (Zoning Regulations) There are also attached some materials to support an additional change in the zoning maps (#6) . This matter was discussed by the Planning, Commission which determined that commercial zoning should be limited to El Camino Real frontage parcels. No one appeared representing the property owner . If the City Council resolves the remaining issues on this matter, it would be appropriate to close the formal public hearing and schedule the attached adopting ordinance for first reading on June 13. LAWRENCE STEVENS ARRAY . WAROe DEN Planning Director ager ps 2 TITLE 9 - ZONING REGULATIONS INDEX Chapter 1. Enactment, Administration, and Amendment 9-1.101 Title and Purpose 1- 1 9-1.102 Official Zoning Maps 1- 1 9-1.103 Open Space Zoning 1- 1 9-1.104 Applicability of the Zoning Regulations 1- 2 9-1.105 Compliance with uses set forth in Zoning 1- 2 Districts Required 9-1.106 Compliance with Standards Required 1- 3 9-1.107 Fees Required 1- 3 9-1. 108 Administration of the Zoning Regulations 1- 3 9-1.109 Rules of Interpretation 1- 3 9-1.110 Public Hearings 1- 6 9-1. 111 Appeal 1- 6 9-1. 112 Adjustment 1- 7 9-1.113 Variance 1- 8 9-1. 114 Special Exception 1- 9 9-1.115 Text Amendment 1-11 9-1. 116 Zoning Map Amendment 1-12 9-1.117 Prezoning 1-13 Iii MAY, 1983 422 fare, or be injurious to nearby property or 423 improvements. 424 425 (2) Findings of Approval: Approval or conditional ap- 426 proval shall be granted only when the Planning Commis- 427 sion determines that the variance satisfies the criteria 428 set forth in Government Code Sections 65906 and 65906 .5 429 by finding that: 430 431 (i) The variance authorized does not constitute a grant 432 of special privileges inconsistent with the limita- 433 tions upon other properties in the vicinity and 434 zoning district in which such property is situated; 435 and 436 437 (ii) There are special circumstances applicable to the 438 property, including size, shape, topography, loca- 439 tion, or surroundings, and because of these circum- 440 stances, the application of this Title would de- 441 prive the property of privileges enjoyed by other 442 property in the vicinity and in the same zoning 443 district; and 444 445 (iii) The variance does not authorize a use which is not 446 otherwise authorized in the zoning district; and 447 448 (iv) The granting of such variance does not, under t 449 circumstances and conditions applied in the par 450 ticular case, adversely affect the health or safety 451 of persons, is not materially detrimental to the 452 public welfare, nor injurious to nearby property or 453 improvements. 454 455 (3) Conditions of Approval: In approving an application 456 for variance, such conditions shall be adopted as are 457 deemed necessary to enable making the findings set forth 458 in Section 9-1.113 (c) (2) . Any change in the conditions 459 of approval of a variance shall only be allowed after 460 following all procedures undertaken for the original 461 approval. 461. 02 9-1.114. Special Exception: A special exception from the appli- 461.03 cation of the provisions of this Title may be requested for any pur- 461.04 pose or use as follows: 461. 05 461.06 (a) Application: A written application for special exception 461. 07 shall be filed with the Planning Department on the form pro- 461.08 vided, accompanied by all graphic information required for 461. 09 application processing, and any additional information neces 461.1 sary to explain the request. Acceptance of the application 461.11 is subject to Section 9-2.102 (Determination of Completen ) 461.12 1-9 4 MAY, 1983 461. 13 (b) Planning Commission Notice and Hearing,: Following accep 461. 14 tance of a special exception application as complete and com- 461.15 pletion of a Staff Report, the Planning Commission shall hold 461.16 a public hearing after giving the public notice required by 461.17 Section 9-1.110 (Public Hearing) . The Planning Commission 461.18 shall submit a written recommendation to the City Council on 461.19 the proposed special exception setting forth findings in sup- 461. 2 port of the recommendation. 461.21 461. 22 (c) City Council Notice and Hearing: Upon receipt of the rec- 461. 23 ommendation of the Planning Commission, the City Council 461.24 shall hold a public hearing after giving the public- notice 461. 25 required by Section 9-1.110 (Public Hearing)_. The City 461. 26 Council shall set forth finding in support of the decision. 461. 27 461. 28 (d) Action on a Special Exception: The hearing body shall ap- 461. 29 prove, approve subject to conditions, or disapprove a special 461.3 exception as set forth in this Subsection. 461. 31 461. 32 (1) Conditions of Approval: The hearing body shall desig- 461. 33 nate such conditions to satisfy any requirements of CEQA 461.34 and may adopt other conditions includinb but not limited 461.35 to: 461.36 461.37 (i) Designate time limits or phasing schedules other 461.38 than those specified in Section 9-2.113 (Permit 461. 39 Time Limits) for the completion of projects when 461.4 deemed appropriate. 461. 41 461. 42 (ii) Requiring that security be provided to guarantee 461.43 performance and/or compliance with conditions of 461. 44 approval, as set forth in Section 9-2. 122 (Guaran- 461.45 tees of Performance) . 461. 46 461. 47 (iii) Requiring installation of specific onsite or off- 461.48 site improvements. 461. 49 461. 5 (iv) Requiring periodic review or limiting the permit to 461. 51 a specified period of time. 461. 52 461. 53 (v) Requiring that a permit be personal to the appli- 461. 54 cant or be applicable to the property. 461. 55 (vi`) Any other conditions are as judged by the hearing 461. 56 body to be necessary to achieve compatibility be 461. 57 tween the proposed use and its site, its immediate 461. 58 surroundings, and the community. 461. 59 461.6 (2) Effect of Conditions: Whenever a Special Exception 461. 61 approval is granted or amended subject to conditions, 461.62 use or enjoyment of the Special Exception approval in 461. 63 violation, or without observance of any conditions, 461. 64 shall constitute a violation of this Title. In the 0461.65 event of such a violation, the approval may be revoked 461. 66 or modified as provided in Section 9-8 .105 (Revocation 461. 67 of Approval and Forfeiture of Bonds) . The duration of 1-10 MAY, 1983 461. 68 conditions is established in Section 9-2. 119 (Lapse 461. 69 Entitlement) . Any change in the conditions of apprAt 461. 7 of a Special Exception shall only be allowed after 461.71 lowing all procedures undertaken for the original 461.72 approval. 461.73 461. 74 (3) Required Findings: If the hearing body approves or 461. 75 conditionally approves a Special Exception, it shall 461.76 first find that: 461. 77 461.78 (i) The proposed Special Exception is reasonable and 461.79 appropriate for the use or purpose intended; and 461. 8 461. 81 (ii) The establishment, and subsequent operation or con 461.82 duct of the use will not, because of the circum- 461. 83 stances and conditions applied in the particular 461.84 case, be detrimental to the health, safety or wel- 461. 85 fare of the general public or persons residing or 461.86 working in the neighborhood of the use, or be det- 461. 87 rimental or injurious to property or improvements 461.88 in the vicinity of the use; and 461. 89 461.9 (iii) That the proposed project or use will not be incon- 461.91 sistent with the character of the immediate neigh- 461.92 borhood or contrary to its orderly development; and 461.93 461.94 (iv) Any additional findings deemed necessary. 463 9-1.115 . Text Amendment: This Title may be amended whenever the 464 City Council deems that public necessity, convenience, or welfare re- 465 quire. 466 (a) Application: Text amendments may be initiated by: 467 468 (1) The City Council or Planning Commission upon its own 469 motion; or 470 471 (2) The City Council or Planning Commission upon acceptance 472 of a request from any interested party, including the 473 Planning Director. Requests shall be in writing and 474 shall include a description of the benefit to be derived 475 as a result of the text amendment. 476 478 (i) The City Council may refer a proposed text amend- 479 ment to the Planning Director and/or Planning Com- 480 mission for response prior to deciding whether to 481 initiate the text amendment. 483 (b) Planning Commission Notice and Hearing: The Planning Com- 484 mission shall hold a public hearing on any proposed text 485 amendment to this Title after giving the public notice re- 486 quired by Section 9-1.110 (Public Hearing) . The purpose 0 487 the hearing shall be to receive testimony from parties in- 488 terested in the proposed text amendment, consider the recom- 1-11 MAY, 1983 489 mendations of the Planning Director, and adopt a recommenda- 490 tion to the City Council. The Planning Commission shall sub- 491 mit a written recommendation to the City Council on the pro- 492 posed amendment setting forth findings in support of the 493 recommendation. 494 495 (c) City Council Notice and Hearing: Upon receipt of the rec- 496 ommendation of the Planning Commission, the City Council 497 shall hold a public hearing after giving the public notice 498 required by Section 9-1.110 (Public Hearing) . The City 499 Council may approve, modify or disapprove the recommendation 500 of the Planning Commission, provided that any modification 501 of a proposed text amendment by the City Council not prev- 502 iously considered by the Planning Commission shall first be 503 referred to the Planning Commission for report and recommen- 504 dation. The Planning Commission is not required to hold a 505 public hearing on such referral. Failure by the Planning 506 Commission to report within (40) days after the referral 507 shall be deemed approval of the proposed modification to the 508 text amendment. 510 9-1. 116. Zoning Map Amendment: The Official Zoning Maps may be 511 amended changing a property or properties from one zoning district to 512 another whenever the City Council determines that public necessity, 513 convenience or welfare require. 514 515 (a) Application: Zoning Map amendments may be initiated by: 516 517 (1) The City Council or Planning Commission upon its own 518 motion; or 519 520 (i) The City Council may refer a proposed zoning map 521 amendment to the Planning Director and/or Planning 522 Commission for response prior to deciding whether 522.1 522. 2 (2) The property owner , owner in escrow, or other designated 522.3 representative of the owner. 523 523.1 (i) A written application for a zoning map amendment 523. 2 shall be filed with the Planning Department on the 523.3 form provided accompanied by all graphic informa- 523.4 tion required for application processing, and any 523. 5 other information deemed necessary to explain the 523.6 request. Acceptance of the application is subject 523.7 to Section 9-2.102 (Determination of Completeness) . 524 525 (b) Planning Commission Notice and Hearing : The Planning Com- 526 mission shall hold a public hearing on any proposed zoning 527 map amendment after giving the public notice required by 528 Section 9-1. 111 (Public Hearing) . The purpose of the hearing 529 shall be to receive testimony from parties interested in the 530 proposed zoning map amendment, consider the recommendations 531 of the Planning Director, and adopt a recommendation to the 532 City Council. The -Planning Commission shall submit a written 1-12 MAY, 1983 533 recommendation to the City Council on the proposed zoning 534 amendment setting forth findings in support of the 535 recommendation. 536 z 537 (c) City Council Notice and Hearing: Upon receipt of the rec- 538 ommendation of the Planning Commission, the City Council 539 shall hold a public hearing after giving the public notice 540 required by Section 9-1.111 (Public Hearing) . The City Coun 541 cil may approve, modify or disapprove the recommendation of 542 the Planning Commission, provided that any modification of a 543 proposed zoning map amendment by the City Council not prev- 544 iously considered by the Planning Commission shall first be 545 referred to the Planning an ng Commission for report and recommen- 546 dation. The Planning Commission is not required to hold a 547 public hearing on such referral. Failure by the Planning 548 Commission to report within forty (40) days after the refer- 549 ral shall be deemed approval of the proposed modification to 550 the zoning map amendment. 552 9-1.117 : Prezoning: The prezoning of unincorporated territory 553 adjacent to the City shall be accomplished in the manner set forth 554 in Section 9-1.115 (Zoning Map Amendment) , except that such prezoning 555 shall not become effective until and unless the annexation becomes 556 effective. 1-13 MAY, 1983 379 (3) Average Slope: Using the Basic, Sectional or Contour 380 Measurement Method, the lot size factor based on this 381 performance standard shall be: 382 383 SLOPE LOT SIZE FACTOR 384 385 0 10% 0. 50 386 11 - 20% 0. 75 387 21 - 25% 1.00 388 26 - 30% 1.25 389 31 - 35% 1.75 390 36 - 40% 2.00 391 40% -+ 2. 25 392 393 (4) Condition of Access: Using the road right-of-way with 394 the shortest accessible distance between a lot and an 395 improved collector road, the lot size factor based on 396 this performance standard shall be: 397 398 CONDITION LOT SIZE FACTOR 399 400 City accepted road 0.40 401 paved road, < 15% slope 0.40 402 paved road, > 15% slope 0.50 403 all-weather road 0.75 404 < 15% slope 405 all-weather road 1.00 406 ? 15% slope 407 unimproved road 1.25 408 < 15% slope 409 unimproved road 1.50 410 > 15% slope 411 412 (5) General Neighborhood Character : Using the average 413 lot size of existing lots which are zoned for single 413.1 family residential use (except that lots larger than 15 413. 2 acres shall be excluded unless they constitute more than 413.3 25% of the total number of lots) within a 1500 foot ra 413.4 dins, the minimum lot size factor based on this perfor- 413.5 mance standard shall be determined by multiplying the 413 . 6 average lot size by 0.2. 419 420 (b) Determination of Minimum Lot Size: The minimum lot size 421 shall be determined by the sum of each of the lot size fac 422 tors for the performance standards set forth in Subsection 423 (a) of this Section. 424 425 (1) The most current information shall be used to determine 426 the lot size factor . Where information is not avail- 427 able, the Planning Director shall determine which lot 428 size factor shall apply. 3-9 MAY, 1983 . 0 430 (2) If more than one lot size factor can be applied to a 431 lot, the less restrictive factor shall be used. 432 0 433 (3) Lot size factors shall be based on conditions in exis- 434 tence at the time of filing an application unless infor 435 mation is included with the application which will alter 436 a lot size factor. 437 438 (c) Adjustment to Minimum Lot Size: The Planning Commission 439 may reduce the minimum lot size determined by Subsection (b) 440 of this Section by an amount not to exceed 20% when consid- 441 ering an application for a land division. 442 443 (1) Application Requirements: A land division applica- 444 tion, which requests the 20% adjustment, shall include 445 the following, as well as any other information deemed 446 necessary by an applicant to support his request: 447 448 (i) Proposed building sites, including average slope of 449 the building sites; 450 451 (ii) Proposed location of private sewage disposal 452 system; 453 454 (iii) Prelminary plan and profile of driveways including 455 slope; 456 457 (iv) Preliminary grading plan for building sites and 458 driveways. 459 460 (2) Required Findings: The Planning Commission shall ap- 461 prove an adjustment only if it finds that: 462 463 (i) There are circumstances applicable to the property 464 including shape, topography, location and surround- 465 ings which warrant use of specific site information 466 rather than generalized area information in deter 467 mining lot size. 468 469 (ii) The specific site information submitted clearly 470 demonstrates that the adjustment in lot size is 471 warranted. 472 473 (iii) The granting of the adjustment will not adversely 474 affect the health or safety of persons, be mater- 475 ially detrimental to the public welfare, or be in- 476 jurious to nearby property or improvements. 477 478 (iv) The granting of the adjustment will result in 479 better utilization of the affected property. 480 481 (v) The granting of the adjustment is consistent with 482 the General Plan. 3-10 MAY, 1983 0 484 RSF (Residential Single Family) Zone 486 9-3.151. Purpose: This zone` is established to provide for single 487 family residential areas within the Urban Services Line. 489 9-3 . 152. Allowable Uses: The following uses shall be allowed in 490 the Residential Single Family Zone. The establishment of allowable 491 uses shall be as provided by Section 9-2.107 (Plot Plan) and Section 492 9-2.108 (Precise Plans) : 493 494 (a) Farm animal raising (See Section 9-6.112) 495 496 (b) Home occupations (See Section 9-6.105) 497 498 (c) Residential accessory uses (See Section 9-6.106) 499 500 (d) Single family dwelling 501 502 (e) Mobilehome dwelling (See Section 9-6.142) 503 504 (f) Temporary dwelling (See Section 9-6.176) 505 506 (g) Accessory storage (See Section 9-6.103) 507 508 (h) Collection station (See Section 9-6.130) 509 510 (i) Skilled Nursing Facility where the number of residents under 511 care is six or fewer (See Section 9-6.134) 512 513 (j) Residential care, where the number of residents under care 514 is six or fewer (See Section 9-6 .135) 515 516 (k) Agricultural accessory uses (See Section 9-6.109) 517 518 (1) Utility transmissin facilities 519 520 (m) Roadside Stands (See Section 9-6.117) 521 522 (n) Temporary Events (see Section 9-6.177) 524 9-3 . 153. Conditional Uses: The following uses may be allowed in 525 the Residential Single Family Zone. The establishment of conditional 526 uses shall be as provided by Section 9-2.109 (Conditional Use 527 Permits) : 528 529 (a) Churches and related activities (See Section 9-6.121) 530 531 (b) Schools (See Section 9-6.125) i532 533 (c) Mobilehome developments (See Section 9-6.143) 534 3-11 0 ! MAY, 1983 536 (d) Skilled Nursing Facility where the number of residents un� 537 care is greater than six (See Section 9-6 .134) 538 539 (e) Residential care, where the number of residents under care is 540 greater than six 541 542 (f) Organizational houses 543 544 (g) Pipeline 545 546 (h) Bed and Breakfast 547 548 (i) Caretaker residence (See Section 9-6.104) 549 550 (j) The following uses where established in a residential 551 structure of historical importance are satisfied: 553 554 (1) Broadcasting studios 555 556 (2) Business support services 557 558 (3) Libraries and museums 559 560 (4) Offices 561 562 (5) Personal Services 563 564 (6) School-business and vocational 565 566 (k) Kennels (See Section 9-6.111) 568 9-3 . 154. Minimum Lot Size: The minimum lot size in the Residen- 569 tial Single Family Zone shall be one-half (1/2) acre and may range up 570 to two and one-half (2 1/2) acres. The size of a lot shall be consis- 571 tent with the land use designation set forth in the General Plan and 572 shall be indicated by the symbols set forth in the following chart, 573 which shall be shown on the Offical Zoning Maps as provided by Section 574 9-3. 104 (d) . 575 576 SYMBOL MINIMUM LOT SIZE 577 578 X one-half (1/2) acre 579 y one (1) acre, when sewers are available 580 one and one-half (1 1/2) acres, when sewers are 581 not available 582 Z one and one-half (1 1/2) to two and one-half 583 (2 1/2) acres based on performance standards set 584 forth in this Section. 585 586 (a) Performance Standards: The following performance standards 587 shall be evaluated for each lot which is appended with th� 588 "Z" symbol in determining its minimum lot size: 3-12 MAY, 1983 769 (f) Organizational houses 770 771 (g) Pipeline 772 z 773 (h) Bed and breakfast 774 775 (i) Caretaker residence (See Section 9-6.104) 775.1 775 .2 (j) The following uses where established in a structure of his- 775.3 torical importance: 775 .4 775 .5 (1) Broadcasting studios 775.6 775 .7 (2) Business support services 775.8 775.9 (3) Libraries and museums 775.91 775.92 (4) Offices 775.93 775.94 (5) Personal Services 775.95 775.96 (6) School - business and vocational 777 9-3 . 164 . Minimum Lot Size: The minimum lot size in the Limited 778 Residential Single Family Zone shall be one-half (1/2) acre and may 779 range up to two and one-half (2 1/2) acres. The size of a lot shall 780 be consistent with the land use designation set forth in the General 781 Plan and shall be indicated by the symbols set forth in the following 782 chart, which shall be shown on the Official Zoning Maps as provided 783 by Section 9-3.104 (d) . 784 785 SYMBOL MINIMUM LOT SIZE 786 787 X one-half (1/2) acre 788 Y one (1) acre, when sewers are available 789 one and one-half (1 1/2) acres, when 790 sewers are not available 791 Z one and one-half (1 1/2) to two and 792 one-half (2 1/2) acres based on per- 793 formance standards set forth in this 794 Section 795 796 (a) Performance Standards: The following performance standards 797 shall be evaluated for each lot which is appended with the 798 "Z" symbol in determining its minimum lot size: 799 800 (1) Distance from the Center of the Community: Using the 801 Atascadero Administration Building as the center of the 802 community, the lot size factor based on this performance 803 standard shall be: 804 3-17 MAY 1983 805 1 806 DISTANCE LOT SIZE FACTOR 807 808 0 - 4000 ' - _ 0.08 809 4000 ' - 6000 ' 0 .10 810 6000 ' - 8000 ' 0.12 811 812 1. To be measured as radial distance using map main- 813 tained in the Planning Department. 814 815 (2) Septic Suitability: Using generalized soils data from 816 the Soil and Conservation Service Reports, the- lot size 817 factor based on this performance standard shall be: 817.1 818 - 819 1 820 SCS RATING LOT SIZE FACTOR 821 822 well suited 0.30 823 moderate or slow 0. 50 824 severe 0.70 824.01 824. 02 1. Refer to map maintained in Planning Department. 824. 03 824.04 (3) Average Slope: Using the Basic, Sectional or Contour 824. 05 Measurement Method, the lot size factor based on this 824.06 performance standard shall be: 824. 07 824. 08 SLOPE LOT SIZE FACTOR 824 .09 824.1 0 - 20% 0.30 824.11 21 - 30% 0. 50 824.12 31% + 825 826 (4) Condition of Access: Using the road right-of-way with 827 the shortest accessible distance between a lot and an 828 improved collector road, the lot size factor based on 829 this performance standard shall be: 830 ' 831 CONDITION LOT SIZE FACTOR 832 833 paved with slope of 0.15 834 less than 15% or City- 835 accepted 836 paved with slope of 0. 20 837 greater than 15% 838 all-weather surface with 0.25 839 slope of less than 15% 840 all-weather surface with 0.30 841 slope of greater than 15% 842 unimproved surface 0.40 .843 3-18 0 MAY, 1983 844 (5) General Neighborhood Character : Using the average 845 lot size of existing lots (except that lots larger 846 than five (5) acres shall be excluded unless they con 847 stitute more than 25% of the total number of lots) 848 within a 1000 foot radius, the minimum lot size factor 849 based on this performance standard shall be determined 850 by multiplying the average lot size by 0 .2. 851 852 (b) Determination of Minimum Lot Size: The minimum lot size 853 shall be determined by the sum of each of the lot size fac 854 tors for the performance standards set forth in Subsection 855 (a) of this Section. 856 857 (1) The most current information shall be used to determine 858 the lot size factor. Where information is not avail- 859 able, the Planning Director shal determine which lot 860 size factor shall apply. 861 862 (2) If more than one lot size factor can be applied to a 863 lot, the less restrictive factor shall be used. 864 865 (3) Lot size factors shall be based on conditions in exis- 866 tence at the time of filing an application unless infor- 867 mation is included with the application which will alter 868 a lot size factor. 869 870 (c) Adjustment to Minimum Lot Size: The Planning Commisssion 871 may reduce the minimum lot size determined by Subsection (b) 872 of this Section by an amount not to exceed 20% when consid- 873 ering an application for a land division. 874 875 (1) Application Requirements: A land division applica 876 tion, which requests the 20% adjustment, shall include 877 the following, as well as any other information deemed 878 necessary by an applicant to support his request: 879 880 (i) Proposed building sites, including average slope 881 of the building sites; 882 883 (ii) Proposed location of private sewage disposal system 884 885 (iii) Preliminary plan and profile of driveways including 886 slope; 887 888 (iv) Preliminary grading plan for building sites and 889 driveways. 890 891 (2) Required Findings: The Planning Commission shall ap- 892 prove an adjustment only if it finds that: 893 894 (i) There are circumstances applicable to the property 895 including shape, topography, location and sur- 896 roundings which warrant use of specific site infor- 897 mation rather than generalized area information in 898 determining lot size. 3-19 MAY, 1983 900 (ii) The specific site information submitted clearly 901 demonstrates that the adjustment in lot size is 902 warranted. 903 - 904 (iii) The granting of the adjustment will not adversely 905 affect the health or safety of persons, be mater- 906 ially detrimental to the public welfare, or be 907 injurious to nearby property or improvements. 908 909 (iv) The granting of the adjustment will result in bet- 910 ter utilization of the affected property. 911 912 (v) The granting of the adjustment is consistent with 913 the General Plan. 3-19a MAY 1983 915 RMF (Residential Multiple Family) Zone 917 9-3.171. Purpose: This zone-is established to, provide for apart- 918 ment, condominium and townhouse development where higher density resi- 9,19 dential development is desired within the Urban Services Line. 921 9-3. 172. Allowable Uses: The following uses shall be allowed in 922 the Residential Multiple Family Zone. The establishment of allowable 923 uses shall be as provided by Section 9-2.107 (Plot Plans) and Section 924 9-2.108 (Precise Plans) : 925 926 (a) Single family dwelling 927 928 (b) Residential accessory uses (See Section 9-6.106) 929 930 (c) Accessory Storage (See Section 9-6.103) 931 932 (d) Home occupations (See Section 9-6.105) 933 934 (e) Collection station (See Section 9-6.130) 935 936 (f) Multiple family dwellings 937 938 (g) Temporary dwelling (See Section 9-6.176) 939 940 (h) Utility transmission facilities 941 942 (i) Skilled Nursing Facility (See Section 9-6.134) 943 944 (j) Residential care (See Section 9-6.135) 945 946 (k) Temporary Events (See Section 9-6.177) 948 9-3.173. Conditional Uses: The following uses may be allowed in 949 the Residential Multiple Family Zone. The establishment of condi- 950 tional uses shall be as provided by Section 9-2.109 (Conditional Use 951 Permits) : 952 954 (a) Churches and related activities (See Section 9-6.121) 955 956 (b) Schools (See Section 9-6.125) 957 958 (c) Mobilehome developments (See Section 9-6.143) 959 960 (d) Organizational Houses 961 962 (e) Pipelines 963 .964 (f) Farm Animal Raising (See Section 9-6.112) 965 966 (g) Retirement hotel 3-20 MAY, 1983 756 I (Industrial) Zone 1758 9-3.311. Purpose: This zone is established to provide suitable 1759 locations for heavy manufacturing and industrial uses within the city. 1761 9-3.312. Allowable Uses: The following uses shall be allowed in 1762 the Industrial Zone. The establishment of allowable uses shall be as 1763 provided by Section 9-2.107 (Plot Plan) and Section 9-2.108 1764 (Precise Plan) : 1765 1766 (a) All uses listed as Allowable Uses in the IP (Industrial Park) 1767 Zone 1768 1769 (b) Agricultural processing 1770 1771 (c) Lumber and wood products 1772 1773 (d) Concrete, gypsum and plaster products 1774 1775 (e) Glass products manufacturing 1778 1779 (f) Paper products 1780 0 781 (g) Paving materials 782 1783 (h) Structural clay pottery products 1785 1786 (i) Machinery manufacturing 1794 9-3.313. Conditional Uses: The following uses may be allowed in 1795 the Industrial Zone. The establishment of conditional uses shall be 1796 as provided by Section 9-2.109 (Conditional Use Permits) : 1797 1798 (a) Chemical products 1799 1800 (b) Caretaker residence (See Section 9-6.104) 1801 1802 (c) Petroleum refining and related products 1803 1804 (d) Textile mill 1805 1806 (e) Metal industries - •primary 1807 1808 (f) Pipelines 1809 1810 (g) Recycling and scrap (See Section 9-6.131) 1811 Am1812 (h) School - business and vocational (See Section 9-6.125) 813 1814 (i) Transit stations and terminals 1815 3-39 MAY 1983 0 - 0 1816 (j) Vehicle and freight terminals 1817 1818 (k) Plastic and rubber products 1820 9-3. 314 . Lot Size: There shall be no minimum lot size in the 1821 Industrial Zone. 3-40 MAY, 1983 753 (v) Birds: none 754 755 (c) Maintenance: All buildings housing domestic animals, all 756 animal enclosures, 'and all pasture areas shall be maintained 757 free from litter, garbage and the accumulation of manure. 758 Premises shall be maintained in a neat and sanitary manner. 759 If farm animals are not maintained in compliance with these 760 standards, or are otherwise allowed to become a nuisance, the 761 Planning Department shall initiate enforcement proceedings as 762 provided by Chapter 9-8 (Enforcement) . 763 764 (d) Special Requirements: The keeping of specific domestic 765 animals is subject to the special standards in this Subsec- 766 tion in addition to other standards set forth in the Section. 767 768 (1) Equines: None. 769 770 (2) Bovines: None. 771 772 (3) Swine: The maximum number of swine allowed on any 773 parcel is three sows and one boar. A greater number of 774 swine constitute a hog ranch which is not permitted in 775 any zoning district. 777 778 (4) Ovine: None. 779 780 (5) Poultry: All poultry shall be contained in coops or 781 pens and not be allowed to run free on a site. The max- 782 imum number of poultry allowed on any parcel is 40 783 (two animal equivalency units) . A greater number of 784 poultry constitute a chicken ranch and shall be subject 785 to Section 9-6.115 (Livestock Specialties if allowed by 786 a particular zoning district. 787 788 (6) Rabbits: All rabbits shall be contained in coops or 789 pens and not be allowed to run free on a site. The max- 790 imum number of rabbits allowed on any parcel is 40 (two 791 animal equivalency units) . A greater number of rabbits 792 constitute a rabbit farm and shall be subject to Section 793 9-6.115 (Livestock Specialties) if allowed by a particu- 794 lar zoning district. 795 796 (7) Turkeys: All turkeys shall be contained in coops or 797 pens and not be allowed to run free on a site. The max 798 imum number of turkeys allowed on any parcel is 8 (four 799 animal equivalency units). A greater number of turkeys 800 constitute a turkey ranch and shall be subject to Sec- 801 tion 9-6.1135 (Livestock Specialties) if allowed by a 802 particular zoning district. 803 804 (8) Birds: None. 805 806 (e) Establishment of Animal Equivalency Units: Animal equiv- 807 alency units are established in this Subsection in order to 6-15 MAY, 1983 - 808 define relationships among domestic animals of various sizes 809 for use in determining allowable animal density. 810 811 (1) Large Animals: 812 0 813 (i) Equines: _ Each equine equals one animal equiv- 814alency unit. 815 816 (ii) Bovines: Each bovine equals one animal equiv 817 alency unit. 818 819 (iii) Swine: Each swine equals one animal equiva- 820 lency unit. 821 822 (2) Small Animals: 823 824 (i) Ovine: Two ovine equal one animal equiva- 825 lency unit. 826 827 (ii) Poultry: Twenty poultry equal one animal 828 equivalency uni-t. 829 830 (iii) Rabbits: Twenty rabbits equal one animal 831 equivalency unit. 832 833 (iv) Turkeys: Two turkeys equal one animal equiv- 834 alency unit. 835 836 (v) Birds: Not applicable. 837 1* 838 (f) Allowable Animal Density: The maximum allowable animal 839 density for a site is established by this Subsection, unless 840 a larger number is allowed as set forth in Subsection h of 841 this Section. 842 843 (1) A Zone: No density limitations. 844 845 (2) RS Zone: Three animal equivalency units per acre, 846 provided that, for the first two acres, no more than one 847 large animal shall be allowed for each full half acre. 848 - 849 (3) RSF Zone: Two animal equivalency units per acre, 850 provided that no more than one large animal shall be 851 allowed for each full half acre. 852 853 (g) Method of Calculating Animal Density: The method of calcu- 854 lating animal density is established by this Subsection. The 855 lot size (in gross acres) is multipled by the allowable ani- 856 mal density (in animal equivalency units per acre) for the 857 particular zoning district. The product is the maximum num- 858 ber of animal equivalency units allowed on the site. (As an 859 example, a 1.4 acre parcel in the RS Zone would allow 5.6 860 animal equivalency units which can be rounded off to 6 as 861 provided by Section 9-1.109 (b) (4) . This would allow two 862 equivalency units for large animals and four equivalency 6-16 M E M O R A N D U M TO: PLANNING COMMISSION May 16, 1983 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: Proposed Revision to Title Concerning Special Exceptions At its meeting on May 9 the City Council (on a 3-2 vote) supported the addition of a special exception procedure into the zoning ordinance pursuant to the attached memorandum from the City Attorney. Since the hearing was continued, the opportunity is still available to change this action, which, in my judgement, has serious, negative implica- tions on the zoning ordinance. This revision is really the "use variance" recycled with a different name. It should be pointed out that Government Code Section 65906 (copy attached) clearly prohibits a variance which "authorizes a use or activity which is not expressly authorized by the zone regulation governing the parcel of property. " It seems evident that the intent is to inform, in a specific manner, through a listing of uses for each zoning district, owners and their neighbors about all uses which are allowed or may be allowed (i.e. conditional uses) in a particular zone. This special exception procedure is not consistent with Govern- ment Code Section 65906. This procedure could result in the granting of special privileges to one or more owners and be contrary to the uniformity protections of- fered by zoning regulations. It is the express purpose of zoning reg- ulations to provide for uniform, fair and equal treatment (see at- tached Government Code Section 65852) . Furthermore, this special exception procedure can result in bypassing the traditional and more acceptable techniques for allowing uses in particular zones. For example, since it would require less time to process and less cost ( in application fees) for a special exception permit than for a zoning map amendment, applicants may opt for the special exception procedure. In so doing they could also avoid the general plan amendment procedure since there are court decisions that support the premise that use permits need not be consistent with the general plan. The end result could be a commercial use in a residen- tial zone, apartments in single family areas, residences in industrial areas. In other words, we could have the type of chaos we are trying to avoid through proper zoning because the special exception device is easier or more convenient. Proposed Revision to Title 9 Concerning Special Exceptions It should be pointed out there is a place for the device suggested by the City Attorney. However, it is in the area of development stand- ards rather than the area of uses that this type of technique is ap- propriate. In fact, the recommended zoning ordinance does make pro- vision to allow revision to certain development standards without a conditional use permit. These include building height (Section 9-4.113 (b) (1) ) , parking (Section 9-4.115 (1) ) , fencing (Section 9-4.128 (b) (3) ) , signing (Section 9-4.134 (g) ) , and farm animal raising (Sec- tion 9-6. 112 (b) ) . Provision has also been made for a procedure called an "adjustment" where the Planning Director can allow revision to cer- tain standards where specified conditions identified in the ordinance are satisfied. Considerable effort has been made to provide flexibility in the pro- posed zoning regulations through the methods discused in the preceed- ing paragraph as well as in the manner in which the uses are listed. Many of the uses are general in nature with broad land use descrip- ions (Section 9-3. 701) . This is in place of long listings of very specific uses traditionally placed in zoning ordinances. It is in- tended to provide the various decision-makers (Planning Director, Planning Commission, City Council) with a more flexible approach to use determinations. Furthermore, there is adequate opportunity for the public to use the zoning ordinance to their best advantage. Unfavorable decisions or interpretations by the Planning Director can be appealed to the Plan- ning Commission and those by the Planning Commission to the City Council. Requested amendments to the text can be made at little cost by submitting a written request. Initially, zone changes (maps) will be little used since the zoning is virtually identical to the general plan. The so-called "escape clause" is unnecessary and could be easily abused even when intentions are honorable. Ample opportunity to in- terpret or amend the zoning regulations is already available. It is my judgement that the recommended ordinance provides for both sufficient flexibility and sufficient certainty to the benefit of the general public. It is also my judgement that much of the work that has9 one into delineatingin particular uses pa ocular zoning districts and into establishing many of the standards is wasted since these can easily become advisory in nature if this special exception procedure is retained. Their P P meaning and importance is significantly reduced if they can be devi- ated from in a facile manner. T h This should not, however , be taken to mean that the regulations will take care of all situations. Certainly, every contingency has not been anticipated. The regulations can be amended, when necessary, to i 2 Proposed Revision to Title 9 Concerning Special Exceptions cover any such anticipated situations and then will be available to everyone rather than being handled as special cases. This will ensure uniform treatment and will avoid the use variance prohibition. LAWRENCE STEVENS Planning Director ps 3 ADMINISTRATION BUILDING CITY ATTORNEY POST OFFICE BOX 747 POST OFFICE Box 749 ATASCADERO. CALIFORNIA 93423 w ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA 93423. PHONE: (805( 466.8000 PHONE: (805( 466-5678 CITY COUNCIL � CITY CLERK '' f•L-'4�) POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY TREASURER d, WWJJ Y/ POST OFFICE BOX 747 �faC CITY MANAGER INCORPORATED JULY 2. 1979 ATASCADERO.CALIFORNIA 4 FINANCE DEPARTMENT - PHONE: (805( 466-860 PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT - y FIRE DEPARTMENT RECREATION DEPARTMENT 6005 LEWIS AVENUE ATASCADERO,CALIFORNIA 93422 .-r- PHONE: (805) 466-2141 MEMORANDLY: January 26, 1983 To: Larry Stevens, Planning Director From: Allen Grimes, City Attorney Cis" Subject: Suggested Amendment to Proposed Zoning Regulations In accordance with our discussion of the other day and your invitation, I sub- mit to you the following provision which would authorize an exception to the fixed provisions of the zoning regulations: The Planning Commission, on the basis of evi- dence submitted at the hearing, or on the basis of its own knowl- edge of the facts and circumstances of the case, may grant a use permit for any purpose or use when it finds: " (1) The proposed use of the property is reasonable and ap- propriate for the use intended; and " (2) The proposed use of the property will not unduly incon- venience the uses existent in the immediate neighborhood." My experience over many years has been that cities struggle with a way in which to exempt a particular use from the strict provisions of the zoning regulations when the circumstances justify it. The usual standards of variances do not provide such an escape clause. The planned development device might if it was available with respect to all land in the city and in all zones, but that is not the case. I see where the Planning Commission struggles from time to time to authorize a particular unusual or unique use where no provision is provided in the zoning regulations to accommodate it. Apparently, the Commission is disappointed that it can't do it, but that doesn't solve the problem. I am of the opinion that a provision along the lines that I have drafted is essential, not only in Atascadero's zoning regulations, but in the zoning regulations of every city, to allow for the granting of exceptions in particular or unique cases MEMORANDUM: Larry Stevens January 26, 1983 Page 2 where they are justified. There is no question but that authorities. time after time declare that the zoning regulations cannot take care of all situations. Yet, we in the cities attempt from time to time to compress all situations into the standard provisions of the zoning regulations. This is both unfair and unjust. Merely because there is a provision such as I have outlined above does not mean that the Planning Commission must open the door and grant use permits to everyone who requests them. The standards I have specified should still prevail, but should be available to take care of the situations that justify such. I am convinced that a provision such as I have drafted is urgently needed in the zoning regulations of all cities, including the City of Atascadero. AG:fr cc: Murray Warden, City Manager =t i � M u asonably restricting the use of solar energy systems other than fo preservation or protection of the public health or safety. This �p o�ibition shall be applicable to charter cities sinde the promotion-.,of the use of nonfossil fuel sources of energy, such as solar energnd energy conservation measures, is a matter of statewide concerp. This section shall not apply to ordinances which impose reason- able restrictions on solar energy systems. However, it is the policy of the state to promofe,,and encourager,Ihe use of solar energy systems and to remove obstacles thereto. Acc9rdingly, reasonable restrictions on a solar energy system are those restrictions which do not significantly increase thedost of the system or significantly decrease its efficiency, or which allow for an alternative system of comparable cost and efficiency. 71$, For the purposes of this section, "solar_ energy system" shall have the same meaning as set forth in Secti6n.,801.5 of the Civil Code. f u, (Added by Stats. 1978, Ch. 1154.) 65851. o such purposes the legislative body may d1bk4e a Establishment of county city, or portions thereof, into zones of the number, shage. zoning districts and ea it deems best suited to carry out the purpose of thfs c ter. (Added by Stats. 1965 Ch 1880.E . rises,•w*� ,a�. —,.-. ,o�.y�.:c+u.c%-.. .��,--._ .._...._ ,._..:e�a�r3sere�J6�m�ati� -•': t - , 65852. All such regulations shall be uniform for each class or Uniformity ?> kind of building or use of land throughout each zone, but the regulation in one type of zone may differ from those in other types of zones. (Repealed and added by Stats. 1965, .Ch. 1880.) otwithstanding Section 65906, any city, incluRlzucru! a "Granny" housing cha r city, county, or city and county may issue a zoning va , sped permit, or conditional use permit for a dwe t to be co ucted, or attached to, a primary residenc n a parcel zoned for a ' gle-family residence, if the dwelling tis intended for the sole upancy of one adult or two ad persons who are 60 years of age oover, and the area of floor ce of the dwelling unit does not exc 640 square feet. (Added by Stats. 81, Ch. 887.) Note: Stats. 1981, Ch 87, als -contains the following findings: Sec. 1. The Legislature d nd declares that: (1) Steps must be tak o encourage the creation of more residenti s'ts'f r persons over the age of 60. (2) There is a erious shortag ~ of housing units for persons er the age of 60. (3) There s_ an important need to aintain senior Citi I s in independent living situations and also t encourage housing arrangements that prevent ` olation of elderly persons and reunites'14milies. 6585 A city, including a charter city, county, or 'ty and Local mobilehome cou shall not prohibit the installation of mobilehomes certified zoning u r the National Mobile Home Construction and Safety Standa ct of 1974 (42 U.S.C. Section 5401, et seq.) on a foundation 69 The legislative body of a county may provide that an ar pl in- commission shall exercise all of the functions and d es ' of board of zoning adjustment or a zoning administrat in a presc ed portion of the county. (Am ded by Stats. 1971, Ch. 462.) . l 65903. board of appeals, if one has been created and estab- Appeals lished by to ordinance, shall hear and determ' a appeals from the decisions the board of zoning adjust nt or the zoning administrator, the case may be. Proced for such appeals shall be as provi by local ordinance. ch board may reverse or affirm, wholly o rtly, or may modif' the order, requirement, decision or determina appealed from 'and may make such order, requirement, decision, determinat' n as should be made, and such action shall be fina . (Added by Stats. 1965, 18& .) 65904. If a board of appeals not been created and established Appeals to legislative the local legislative body s 11 e' cine all of the functions and body duties of the board of appe s in the a manner and to the same effect as provided in Sec on 65903. (Added by Stats. 19 , Ch. -1880.) 65905. Whenevern, n application for a var ce, or a conditional Notice—permits, use permit or other ermit, for revocation or dification of same variances or an appeal fro the action taken thereon, i` ubmitted to the body or person harged with conducting a public' aring thereon, notice of hear*' g shall be given by notice through the, nited States mails, with stage prepaid using addresses from the equalized assessmen roll, or alternatively, from such other rec s of the assessor the tax collector as contain more recent ad sses in the op' on of said body, or by both publication in a newsp" er of gene circulation in accordance with Section 65854 and p ting sai notice in conspicuous places close to the property affected. Pr edure for mailing or posting of said notices shall be governed by the provisions of ttDc1ranoe, <fdettq`Mats. 1965; 65906. Variances from the terms of the zoning ordinances shall Vari ` s be granted only when, because of special circumstances applicable to the property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, the strict application of the zoning ordinance deprives such property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under identical zoning classification. a Any variance granted shall be subject to such conditions as will assure that the adjustment thereby authorized shall not con- stitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zone in which such property is situated. A variance shall not be granted for a parcel of property which authorizes a use or activity which is not .otherwise expressly authorized by the zone regulation governing the parcel of property. The provisions of this section shall not apply to conditional use permits. (Amended by Stats. 1974, Ch. 607.) 79 M E M O R A N D U M i s. TO: CITY MANAGER May 3, 1983 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: Public Hearing on Title 9 (Zoning Regulations) and Citywide Rezoning Program On may 2, 1983 the Planning Commission conducted its final hearing on the new zoning ordinance and on the revised zoning maps and determined as follows: 1) Adopt Findings 1-9 (per attached May 2 Memorandum) 2) Adopt Conditional Negative Declaration 3) Approve Title 9 as submitted, including certain revisions listed herein 4) Approve Rezoning Program as submitted, including certain re- visions contained herein There was considerable discussion among the Commission on a number of topics, including: - standards for PD4 overlay zone which affects the Roselip property - sign regulations set forth in Chapter 4 - density bonus in RMF Zone - farm animals, including allowable density, farm animals in LSF Zone, and special limitations for swine - seasonal sales/farmer ' s market (Chapter 6) - map change at San Anselmo and 101 - map change at E1 Camino Real near Solano (Platz/Phillips request) Other discussion was relatively minor in nature.. The Commission rec- ommended the following changes from the copies of the ordinance and map which were distributed last week : 1) Page 3-9, Line 413 - add underlined portion " . . . .of existing lot which are zoned for single familyresidential use (except. . . . " 2) Page 3-12, Line 551-2 - delete "where criteria specified in Section 9-6. are satisfied" 3) Page 3-17, Line 776 - add underlined portion (j) Farm Animal Raising (See Section 9-6 .112) and (k) The followin2 uses where esta is a in a structure of histgri�a�, importance. . " (same as in RSF Zone) Re: Title 9 (Zoning-Regulations) /Citywide Rezoning Program 4) Page 3-39 , Line 1777, 1788, 1790, 1792 - delete all of each line 5) Page 6-15 , Line 775-6 - -delete "Swine shall only be allowed in the RS and A Zoning Districts. " 6) Page 6-16, Line 849 - add underlined portion "RSF and LSF Zone. . . " 7) Change Map #11 at San Anselmo and 101 per attached. 8) Change Map #19 at El Camino Real near Solano per attached. Public input was provided on these changes as well as a number of other topics by the following: - Art Jazwiecki (various topics) - Gary Larsen (various topics, especially PD4 standards and signing) - John Euphrat (PD4 standards) - Bernard Roselip (PD4 standards) —Elbert Gifford (density bonuses) Frank Platz, Dan Phillips, Gordon Grant and others (zoning on El Camino Real near Solano) John McNeil (zoning on Barrenda) If the City Council concurs with the Planning Commission recommenda- tion, it is recommended that the public hearing be closed and that Staff be directed to bring back an ordinance for first reading on May 23. LAWRENCE STEVENS MUR Y L WARDEN Planning Director City Ma ager Ps 2 cts OC C) L; 1 o ChU d � Lli cr ao Q acuao ro 196.24A LN o u1 UJ o d o � o CQ o c tn 29 9� sm` 2$l. - i ocin 8 a O � n 90 o _ 7,L3 Lo r 66: •�Erb21 � 29•�'`''� `mow M Nin ot - cn a mO1 s•s�• _ a Ci ___ � c N 5r� f o M $c wv Qi O C v &g`92— O r+ _ i Q tM0 N / co Z U ZV O Q to Q N`� N O tt (r h� N Q cli t- I � • N� A! 3 0 < tR C LtJ l � ov vzz +OBY ` CO ?Lfi91 Z3 (n� Q 3,OZeLS'N [e 6B/ O Q o O N OIq � N ^ 2 ,p O Q' � � N � a 14'OS zrs�i LE'Zo 9/•59/ 9/-0-9/ a a / 6,9, Ls Uzi � n eM � 1 Q • � C K n ro Q Ik ` a � i � ,t pLM•�S,p� .s * 90. I � 9B$ m Q N0 Q V b N ® o h o f9:S'// F S9 S9 SB I ' May 2, 1983 MEMORANDUM: T0: Planning Commission FROM: Planning Director SUBJECT: Adontion Hearing for Title 9 (Zoning Regulations) and City-wide Rezoning Program 1. Title 9 (Zoning Regulations) The attached document is recommended for approval by the Planning Commission. It includes all previously approved changes as well as the following: Chanter 1: -9-1.105 and 94. 106 (clarifies that non-conforming uses are exempt) 9-). 108 (b) (deletes section on permit issuance) -9-1. 111 (clarifies appeals by Council and Commission) , and requires notice to each of the decisions) -9-1.117 and 118 (deletes sections since incluc?ec in elsewhere in Municipal Code) Chapter 2 : 9-2.106 (b) (3) (eliminates unnecessary language) 9-2. 107 (b) (4) (adds other utilities to requirement to be shown on application) -9-2. 108 (b) (2) (iv) (requires Findings for Precise Plan approval) 97.109 (c) (2) (allows Commission to limit CUP' s by time and to a particular applicant) . 9-2. 118 (a) (3) (eliminates unnecessary language) Chapter 3: 9-3. 104 (d) (revises lot size symbols) -9-3. 123 (deletes "Bed and Breakfast") 9-3. 144, 154 and 164 (adds minimum lot size standards) -9-3. 175 (revises density bonus) -9-3.203 (allows certain uses when greater than 1000 square feet of floor area) -9-3. 213 (allow certain uses when greater than 2500 square feet of floor area) -9-3.232 (revises to allow all Allowable Uses from CR) -9-3.245 (Deletes"Special Criteria"Section) -9-3.252 (several industrial uses moved from Allow- able to Conditional) -9-3. 253 (add "Structural Clay Products") 9-3. 262 (several industrial uses moved from Allow- able to Conditional) 9-3.312 (revises to allow all Allowable Use from IP) (several industrial uses moved from Allow- able to Conditional) -9-3. 414 (establishes lot size requirements) -9-3. 451 (add PD overlay standards) Chapter 4 : NONE Chapter 5: NONE Chanter 6 : -9-6.102 (clarifies accessory structure construction limits) 9-6. 103 (c) (3) (reduces inoperative vehicle storage) 9-6.103 (d) (allows storage of energy-related fuels) -9-6.11.2 (deletes mink as allowable animal) -9-6.112 (b) (revises animal setbacks to allow measure- . ment from buildings on adjacent property rather than the property line) 9-6. 112(c) (specifies that animals maintained as a nuisance may be abated) 9-6.112 (d) (3) (allows swine in RS and A zones only) 9-6. 112 (e) (chancres animal equivalent units for rabbits and poultry) 9-6.112 (f) (reduces allowable animal density) -9-6. 115 (includes "chicken ranch" as "livestock specialty") (deletes worms and bees) 9-6. 120 (deletes special standards for cemeteries) -9-6. 121 (deletes special standards for churches) -9-6.145 (deletes special standards for organ- izational houses) -976.174 (revises seasonal sales to allow farmer' s market) Chapter 7: 9-7.109 (c) (specifies time period for discon- tinuance) -9-7.112 (clarifies "substitution of use") Chapter 3: NONE Chapter 9 : -9-9.102 deletes additional unneeded definitions and adds various figures) Other changes are minor or technical in nature. with no change to the effect of proposed regulations. 2. Citywide Rezoning Program No changes have been made to the maps as previously reviewed. 3. Additional Requests Certain requests for either text or map changes have been made or were referred to the Commission for review by the Council. These include: -request by John Euphrat to change standards for PD4 Overlay (Roselip property) to make all uses by Conditional Use Permit (STAFF RECOMMENDS DENIAL) -request by Frank Platz and Dan Phillips to expand CS area on Map No. 19 (STAFF RECOMMENDS DENIAL) -request by Doug Lewis to add Neighborhood Profes- sional Zone (STAFF RECOMMENDS DENIAL) -request by Eileen and Craig Cunningham to expand R14F/16 along Barrenda on Map No. 6 (STAFF RECOM- MENDS DENIAL) Where available, supporting materials submitted for these requests are attached. Material has not been submitted on all requests. It can be anticipated that other requests will be forthcoming at the hearing as Staff has and contact with several people concerning the application of LSF vs. RSF zones. 4. Environmental Determination An ordinance is a project subject to the requirements of C.E.Q.A. In this case, an EIR was reviewed with the adoption of the General Plan. This project (consisting of the ordinace text and maps) is part of the single EIR prepared therefore and is also considered to be a phase of that General Plan project. 5. Findings 1. Zonings regulations proposed in conjunction with the establishment of Title 9 and zoning maps proposed in conjunction with the Citywide Rezoning Program are consistent with the purpose and intent if the 1980 Atascadero General Plan and support the goals and policies contained therein. 2. The regulations set forth in Title 9 are intended to protect and promote the public health, safety and general welfare. 3. The general public will be assisted by these regulations and the zoning maps since they provide a better under- standing and clearer identification of regulations and and other standards affecting the development and use of land within the City. 4. Procedures established in the proposed regulations are intended to streamline the development review process by eliminating unnecessary and duplicative reviews and hear- ings. 5. The proposed standards and regulations are necessary to implement the California Government Code and to minimize adverse effects on the public resulting from inappro- priate creation, location, use or design of building sites, structures, or other land uses. 6. It is necessary to protect and enhance unique and sig- nificant natural, historic, cultural and scenic resources within the City by providing, appropriate tools to ac- complish those goals. 7. It is necessary and desirable to provide for different zoning districts for agricultural, residential, com- mercial, industrial, recreation, and public uses to assure that incompatible land uses are appropriately separated. 8. The four Planned Development overlay zones shown on the zoning maps and the regulations applied thereto are war- ranted to promote the orderly and harmonious development of the affected properties and to enhance the opportunito to utilize the special characteristics of each area in a beneficial manner. 0 s 9. Approval of this project will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment and the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report is not necessary, especially since one was previously certified in con- junction with the Atascadero General Plan. RECOMMENDATION Based upon the above Findings, the Planning Director rec- ommends adoption of a Conditonal Negative Declaration specifying compliance with the General Plan EIR and approval of the Citywide Rezoning Program and Title 9 as set forth in the attached maps and documents. ACTIOTI Direct Staff by motion as deemed appropriate. PREP ED BY: LAWRENCE STEVENS Planning Director 9 t Y I 2 , OJ In V ool 0 W m m C Z O ./ ,% 9'Fvr a ? U fn Z Q J SJ h a OO Q Z W Q 0 -1 o ® p u a IN A '3.£O•rs N Z Q a 0 9e'esr d k x i h N� op h j � zo rBr s or/ ;ore 3:02•LS N O ¢4 •a � a ti 10 M Z 0 IZLL 0 0 t!co OJ p C W N M}". oil O 3 O-�: U-Z- � LL K 1 04'422 rL OC QW) L�.I .osv U a z�-a- Q : Q :ros ZL'69/ Z ------you---- Z _ O $ ). 3,OZ.LS'N LF'1B/ u « 2 ` u ^ ^ d 2!DS 26YI 11 B/59/ 9/'OS/ wr/ n To a1. 4 Kv Ot m h h vv air+ lOLM Ls,OL b. � V V 9O' 4 No OIA A .OL � Wh 4i u m vS h q Olo I ® V h O I 0 ��• N Q SB SB SB 12 BV 611 > ;."OZ.LS S ——soon v�Q. SYSTEMS DESIGN TELEPHONE (805) 466-2015 TECHNICAL WRITING PHOTO.MEDIA COUNSEL DATA RESOURCES Lewis ] APPLIED CREATIVITY Douglas R. LiApril 2 25, l983 ' POST OFFICE BOX 1017 ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA 93422 City of Atascadero Planning Commission P.O. Box 747 Atascadero, Subject: Addenda to Draft California 93423 Zoning Ordinance proposed. Testimony. Mr. Chairman; Commissioners: The accompanying pages contain a draft of a .proposed addition to the citywide Zoning Ordinance now in preparation and comir4 pefore you as a matter of Public Hearing. It is the purpose of the ma serial. presented to you with this letter of Petition, to establish a zone to be identified in this testimony as the 1EIGHBORHOOD PROFESSIONAL Zone or N P Zone , as abbreviated. The future of Atascadero will likely bear some resemblance to the future of the rest of the State , and- Nation. I do not believe the present or future interests of Atascadero are best served by attempting to extensively compartmentalize the living and occupation- al activities of the citizenry overmuch, at variance both with accue-, toured patterns hereabouts and with accelerating trends in the larger society. The increasing appropriateness of the remote workstation, the inexorable shift from an industrial economy to a service, management and information economy, limitless communications options , the onset of the age of the on-line computer in every home. . . every office, . . every classroom. . . every workplace , shopping tours with immediate pur- chase confirmation (and billing) completed with' the ease and pace of a televised game show, lifestyle taking precedence over workstyle in in the choosing of where you do it: the planning -- and tonin -- of Atascadero should be in preparation for what is sure to come; The Future. . . the .I,onghaul future. . . the twenty-first century. The congenial intermi.nglinE of some informal moderate density residential and professional uses is of longstanding and venerable tradition ; in our society. Such uses are frequently not transitional but exactly what they appear to be -- congenial interminglings. I ask the Planning Commission to condone such uses, a-rid establish such designation of zoning, where appropriate or desired , for Atascadero. Respectfully ^'tr7oe : ': v es i .L i SnP^ CJ" title i C.; t ul _i ., 'c c't E cc�lr G L' lS . lcc� 1`r a-,t1Ces iC. re _c . L . c., E:-`.' r-hbo'"— c" rer6 sin c1.�.' i fi ^1� ` reel^ze-nt_ :p"'rit'c :;o�� e' e"1 : ��s F C te..+� �.�n7 G~ESir _�1 Jlic i': +�^ Tl �, ''ta i ..t-r1 r'_.l_.?'1='.c. UZ. re s I aence-s ., 7 .:_estic res_ 1r ctic f c 1er-,ce .. CPC-.,r +— �..... .c,t._..., - _r'= to Ji.`� 1_ _ nr_fessior� -af -! - _ .ri e _ _ r s ._ � e re�_ u,-1 - n ti,�l uses : + ._ L 4 w V di----)!::LCE' the 01.:er . �'''-I-- r01eti'7c:� e�ncolinters 115 Cus1nE ,._ Ci _ E.,le_ _ s--- �-- y c rE. e:.:L.� __ re t ._ use , v =-,:D c) :;E_. or y th e - e i= _�.crL. `_�� r..rFC u sale uses :a e e s t'.�,.:,l ilsr�c•.�_ ..s _ _ .'-% iQeQ D�' % _.cC 11 J.. . ,...... , `_:ect-i On . . . alio sn':il 1nC ,iae ic:ei.t n i c n 11 a C n, ron let iry cc) ei.ie e ucCL4 is 27 services &-;c ,-, :s fat ah'- ir O.lse ;1th �rac- t _tiJ-Frs , ther Ists , j'�:'isors , a.Fe;:t:.' . � `.7here ;ire.-� 'c'. use are A3rE festEr �r 1 ,r, iptnr ( C �' ;Tt } i ter d strib-.ltcenters ( d ) CollectlOtl ,St -t101,. e. 7'lbrurles and mause:ims ( f1 in-home anti ,,e _ ;d memorabilia outlets -- non-<�uctiou (, ( ! fro �.dc::st studios .--:iJ1 conmanication centers ( hl 7;-.oto7-r .nhic etu iios ..:d r illeries i :rts end cr._-its stud:',: �.ad ;iEriE= o:- - r-- sc: �E not 1 t r l --, C e S , C r 'ive I,u1,` ;al :.ces � ive rE se 1nC'zSt i e , o ttr 'C ( j ecru tart 1 and mall sho ) ser- ; ce' 'I]er6 c_ _ e;: ? sE'rVicE tvoic ..11`J o., c .:'.,.tr ^,t Cr C'' Dre- it - r= .if nt , '.Ut 'Ie:)E :: .ent 0 .'.. �_.-1 .. C_ ie -AE 2 ., s to ,il - be the C:.. P for C _ i ( 'C Fir. C _ d- 1 s o r s , br:,--ers f _ � : _- ,:.a: �er:ent encie� acCU ':tantsIi s t s ( 1` �r--ctit _ ne-s or the he___ '1" ts 1 -,2ionOitice-. ...._^,:i ,.i- tr ti.ve bL.c:E SOC-.tiO':S , c.- . . er+ Uri' ._ Z%StlU: U1 r1Ce: i '�t.. '1T ) i i', - )'_vol i t ALT,l; r .. -e,,-,):)- , fi ceS :l SET ,i ce:' �.l_ o7,able SES C t ' . f p u: 1 .-esti E ;Or ser, c , :iEre ire-: of u5E Ore 1 o c ted i thi a zD a i ( y1 r.ics s'r _�_ _ =Ei .st tulle urs :�r d: :, trs�:. �l carr - •:r:ere iur]::: er 1,of _ si le u_.<e- _r :_�: Dr i c,.•c :1 t t --Lrt _C.1 l.1 1, s•'ev1a Iti s ( u � 7ri�r . E -frw._c.; se 1 re_I-estate o= _ ices . _ZlC, LZe i.. t1:C tiL .. vr:.v d _'rU- fese _ _1 "C!:e E-- t_,e a :;:Fr I v 1r - re2-ide::t_ size as if t= '. . . ive u Le _ie . 4:.,. moI 1 ae i riee inC, t'-e cc.-tir_'.,.`. 4, .re -.. of -1_,e _Cter i Stic: „i' tre_ n -3. . • • . C a4Vl ..� c:: �e alloy' e d in k-)e elr_;, or ^Jd �l^o e; sl•?ti l V.J �1 v T '_atQ L� k Secti0n. . . . Sectio n. . . . t establish co;:ditlo1 .1 1sE.s iticlude : Xisti:;17 multi-u.:it reside:.Ces ii, tr' lsit 0.: Cy co:;ve.-6ioii r , r � C r r e '1 i 6 e LO 'fro. e 10 ..1 11S:i='e .':.F. 'E hyt lu Z .1 _ has � t ;1.; � lxca B n 1 multi-f=� ril� resioer.ces . Reversion to residence of er triyn f'::mil- or proori- ,Lary ccnvenie ice ( ovner/c,rets-,cer) sr i.ii -.of ue allollred ir. a ' ei nborhood Profess ior:,xl Io tie rye-ciJ:::C1r,ic F< l:lalti-ui:it sn�tce :11oc- tio:.s under single oroprietorshi-; is to b:. Ft;colr�� u . ( L� Tr st.it Ilio . :l eztabILiZhm.ec,t oi' risice:,ti _� c :re I ;LC tIeZ, :^Fre t e '1!:ber Ot _ se^+S unser c :.re 1S E3:lst r St 1Ct i7'e: of a :;-�rouri, to s1ZE . ,CV.' So::btr iCiiJt7, i:ust Le C:.1IeCt -ir 1 cJ:'i_itiUle to underlyl:ic� It `;iE I .�:.:li 1 t j1C1F:it1�1 ( c ) !)d.y care f=icilitles , pre-sch:;ol nurseries ( d -.Ea ana ire t lodegin , est : a.>_lstiments. -, . . . . . . . .,reel ( a � arr.1:;" _ Z _ r_ :e' rOVISlo.. S :i__ 1.Ot i"Itr e or C.1' ' �; - .� :. � � as .a.riate ine visluie site of a ,r-)yes: io ,lse to tuF detri:r.e::t of tre resid neti,l c"�_ ,ct�.- ^` tnP i.e err. ou . 'st JI, _rl : �.e nc i _ rrI tcrlaCC t . . EXtC sive cr E CC ` - '�ti_ ::F �_. - CP :EE ?E. i CO::i7 t i u U L r-ith ';EiThUorho---d -7rofes; I _ . ..I o a,.-- i ,.-- Vii^" ._ n; cf sites a}.d ehicIe s h a I ce s..cdue-d cr ��a l- e}:I}:tE":. F -r Vcrl�la� nsi-J= E '� cf _ _,rF"_ _ t_CE _ lJ�E� G� 4' t r: c, h,e r .r, F 2 o;r;-1:e i J e tif- C i_ ,, i � t _ r to i3rCzr: c= C 1 .�:, C ( C::rC,2 _..c L'Fr.I ._ .: 1 _ . _ I FE + c. crlyii JE 4rI 1 t2EC.__C .... e ..t�� I ,EI: l�" slr_�i.�^1 Z .�. .�� _ C. . ErC . .tr .. - _�.� 1J EL; U 'r�: to 'he rlr:ci l ,c-r nCes f t r �E',; � `"r CCt.Ce ed . 7s .'IsiCi11t' ,.'.;C._ a.ti 7nI Ce Er;'Icez r - c s zr c ri �-.F, on r i_ re - .1.- de -- ver . .;aSl._eS er 10E:i TE_`, i _ i .E .C;, _ - ce`I ..e .: o e t h a Lr-i -s er -cr_ i 4 April 27.1983 i Mr. Larry Stevens Director, Planning Dept. , City of Atascadero. Mr. Robert Lilley Chairman, Planning Commission City of Atascadero. Dear Sirs, As my wife,Eileen, and I are going to be out of town for the next meeting of the Planning Commission on May 2 and the next meeting of the City Council on May 9, we have asked a friend, John McNeil, to represent us at these two meetings. Eileen and I and our son David and wife Kathi own a lot on Barrenda Ave. , off Traffic Way in Atascadero - lot #23 see attached map. We purchased the lot in 1977 at which time our son and family expected to move to Atascadero. Things changed and their plans did not work out. We have tried to sell the lot and have not been successful. Lots #23 and #24 are the only vacant lots on the east side of Barrenda near the intersection of Traffic Way and the line dividing multiple family dwellings and single family dwellings comes between these two lots. We think it would be easier to sell our lot if it were zoned multiple family. Also being near the center of town it is more or less in the hi density area. The owner of lot ##24 may find it advantageous to purchase our lot if it were zoned for multiple family dwellings. For these reasons we are asking for a zone change on lot #23 at 5381 Barrenda Ave. , from single family dwelling to multiple family dwellings. We would appreciate having this matter considered at your Monday, May 2 meeting. We hope you will grant this zone change. Thank you, Sincerely E.Craig and Eileen P.Cunningham 8707 Casitas Rd. , Atascadero Tel. ## 466-1427. �'��r� T � �\a) 00 � s so G -14 aE L71 Nq�0 �� t s f y �`Q1O S°o3 � 1 zj�i0 v N 2493E \ T� rNN leo SQ2o35, N 3 50 O" O N 24-00,E _ ,w 3 0 E ti O ,, �9a.z-A N290 05.E 30/5 w N 7045,w N290 05'E rn Z O oro O /SS,of �23 F a O 311 v PM 20.52 2a9.7/ M co ,, a.z v Z � O d t` 0 n w to N \. .�i V N oLnC-) N , UD S 62.50 62.50 y �} /-s" N29 0,5E //i 33 5 iso PM 20-52 � z w fit -4 Vq N A� OD cND e W4 Y TS S/.tv4 �.GO r ADMINISTRATION BUILDING • CITY ATTORNEY POST OFFICE BOX 747 POST OFFICE BOX 749 ATASCADERO,CALIFORNIA 93423 ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA 93423 PHONE: (805) 466-8000 PHONE: (805) 466.5678 CITY COUNCIL � CITY CLERK POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY TREASURER asewancis POST FICE BOX 747 CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT INCORPORATED JULY 2, 1979 ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA 93423 FIN PHONE: (805) 466-8600 PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT ,.r... PLANNING DEPARTMENT - z PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT RECREATION DEPARTMENT 6005 LEWIS AVENUE ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA 93422 ...�, PHONE: (805) 466-2141 MEMORANDUM January 26, 1983 To: Larry Stevens, Planning Director From: Allen Grimes, City Attorney v6r Subject: Suggested Amendment to Proposed zoning Regulations In accordance with our discussion of the other day and your invitation, I sub- mit to you the following provision which would authorize an exception to the fixed provisions of the zoning regulations: "S The Planning Commission, on the basis of evi- dence submitted at the hearing, or on the basis of its own knowl- edge of the facts and circumstances of the case, may grant a use permit for any purpose or use when it finds: " (1) The proposed use of the property is reasonable and ap- propriate for the use intended; and " (2) The proposed use of the property will not unduly incon- venience the uses existent in the immediate neighborhood." My experience over many years has been that cities struggle with a way in which to exempt a particular use from the strict provisions of the zoning regulations when the circumstances justify it. The usual standards of variances do not provide such an escape clause. The planned development device might if it was available with respect to all land in the city and in all zones, but that is not the case. I see where the Planning Commission struggles from time to time to authorize a particular unusual or unique use where no provision is provided in the zoning regulations to accommodate it. Apparently, the Commission is disappointed that it can't do it, but that doesn't solve the problem. I am of the opinion that a provision along the lines that I have drafted is essential, not only in Atascadero's zoning regulations, but in the zoning regulations of every city, to allow for the granting of exceptions in particular or unique cases MEMORANDUM: Larry Stevens January 26, 1983 Page 2 L where they are justified. There is no question but that authorities time after time declare that the zoning regulations cannot take care of all situations. Yet, we in the cities attempt from time to time to compress all situations into the standard provisions of the zoning regulations. This is both unfair and unjust. Merely because there is a provision such as I have outlined above does not mean that the Planning Commission must open the door and grant use permits to everyone who requests them. The standards I have specified should still prevail, but should be available to take care of the situations that justify such. I am convinced that a provision such as I have drafted is urgently needed in the zoning regulations of all cities, including the City of Atascadero. AG:fr cc: Murray Warden, City Manager • ORDINANCE NO. 68 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO ESTABLISHING TITLE 9 (ZONING REGULATIONS) OF THE ATASCADERO MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADOPTING THE CITY-WIDE REZONING PROGRAM ESTABLISHING NEW OFFICIAL ZONING MAPS FOR THE ENTIRE CITY AND REPEALING ALL OF TITLE 22, CHAPTER 19.60 OF TITLE 19 AND CHAPTER 1 OF TITLE 8 OF THE ATASCADERO MUNICIPAL CODE. The Atascadero City Council ordains as follows: Section 1. Council Findings: After conducting public hearings, the City Council finds and determines that: 1. Zoning regulations proposed in conjunction with the estab- lishment of Title 9 and zoning maps proposed in conjunction with the Citywide Rezoning Program are consistent with the purpose and intent of the 1980 Atascadero General Plan and support the goals and policies contained therein. 2. The regulations set forth in Title 9 are intended to protect and promote the public health, safety and general welfare. 3. The general public will be assisted by these regulations and the zoning maps since they provide a better understanding and clearer identification of regulations and other standards af- fecting the development and use of land within the City. 4. Procedures established in the proposed regulations are inten- ded to streamline the development review process by elimin- ating unnecessary and duplicative review and hearings. 5. The proposed standards and regulations are necessary to im- plement the California Government Code and to minimize ad- verse effects on the public resulting from inappropriate cre- ation, location, use or design of building sites,, structures, or other land uses. 6. It is necessary to protect and enhance unique and significant natural, historic, cultural and scenic resources within the City by providing appropriate tools to accomplish these goals. 7. It is necessary and desirable to provide for different zoning districts for agricultural, residential, commercial, indus- trial, recreation and public uses to assure that incompatible land uses are appropriately separated. Ordinance No. 68 8. The four Planned Development overlay zones shown on the zon- ing maps and the regulations applied thereto are warranted to promote the orderly and harmonious development of the af- fected properties and to enhance the opportunity to utilize the special characteristics of each area in a beneficial manner. 9. Approval of this project will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment and the preparation of an Environ- mental Impact Report is not necessary, especially since one was previously certified in conjunction with the Atascadero General Plan. Section 2. The Atascadero Municipal Code is amended by repeal- ing the following designated provisions: CHAPTER TITLE All of Title 22 Zoning. Chapter 19.60 of Title 19 Miscellaneous and General Requirements. Chapter l of Title 8 Development standards intended to protect new structures and additions to existing struc- tures from flooding hazards occurring on certain property in the Amapoa-Tecorida area. Section 3. Zoning Regulations. Title 9 (Zoning Regulations) is added to the Atascadero Municipal Code as set forth in Exhibit A-1 which is hereby referred to and made a part of this ordinance as if fully set out herein. Section 4. Zoning Maps. The Official Zoning Maps on file in the City Planning Department are hereby replaced in their entirety by a new series of maps, at a scale of 1"=400 ' , numbered consecutively as Map Nos. 1-25, inclusive, upon which is emblazoned the designation "Official Zoning Maps of the City of Atascadero. " The new Official Zoning Maps amend the zoning classifications for every property in the City as shown in Exhibit B-1 which is hereby referred to and made a part of this ordinance as if fully set out herein. 2 Ordinance No. 68 Section 5. Zoning Regulations - Summary Form Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65854. 5 (b) , Title 9 (Zoning Regulations) shall be published in summary form as set forth in Exhibit A-2 which is hereby referred to and made a part of this ordinance as if fully set out herein. Copies of the full text of Title 9 (Zoning Regulations) are available for public review at the following locations: 1) City Planning Department, Administration Building, Room 103, 6500 Palma 2) Adult Library, Administration Building, Room 104 , 6500 Palma 3) Atascadero Chamber of Commerce, 6550 El Camino Real 4) City Clerk ' s Office, Administration Building, Room 201, 6500 Palma Section 6. Zoning Maps - Summary Form. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65854 . 5 (b) , the Official Zoning Maps shall be published in summary form at a scale of 1"=1000 ' as set forth in Exhibit B-2 which is hereby referred to and made a part of this ordinance as if fully set out herein. Copies of the full series of Official Zoning Maps are available for public review at the following locations: 1) City Planning Department, Administration Building, Room 103 , 6500 Palma 2) Adult Library, Administration Building, Room 104 , 6500 Palma 3) Atascadero Chamber of Commerce, 6550 E1 Camino Real 4) City Clerk' s Office, Administration Building, Room 201, 6500 Palma Section 7. Publication. The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published once within fifteen (15) days after its passage in the Atascadero News, a newspaper of general circulation, printed, published and circulated in the City in accordance with Section 36933 of the ' Government Code, shall certify the adopting and posting of this ordinance and shall cause this ordinance and this certification together with proof of posting to be entered into the Book of Ordinances of this City. Section 8 . Effective Date. This ordinance shall go into effect and be in full force and ef- fect at 12:01 a.m. on the 31st day after its pasasage. The foregoing ordinance was introduced on and adopted at a regular meeting of the Council on 3 ! i Ordinance No. 68 AYES: NOES: i ABSENT: ROLFE N. NELSON, Mayor ATTEST: BARBARA NORRIS, City Clerk Approved as to f r ALLEN GRIMES, City Attorney Approved as to content: MURRAY L. WARDEN, City Manager 4 EXHIBIT A-2 ORDINANCE NO. 68 TITLE 9. ZONING REGULATIONS Chapter 1. Enactment, Administration and Amendment. Chapter 2. Applications - Content, Processing and Time Limits. Chapter 3. Zoning Districts. Chapter 4. General Site Design and Development Standards. Chapter 5. Reserved. Chapter 6. Special Uses. Chapter 7. Nonconforming Uses. Chapter 8. Enforcement. Chapter 9. General Definitions. Chapter 1. Enactment, Administration, and Amendment 9-1. 101 Title and Purpose 1- 1 9-1. 102 Official Zoning Maps 1- 1 9-1.103 Open Space Zoning 1 1 9-1.104 Applicability of the Zoning Regulations 1- 2 9-1.105 Compliance with uses set forth in Zoning 1- 2 Districts Required 9-1.106 Compliance with Standards Required 1- 3 9-1.107 Fees Required 1- 3 9-1. 108 Administration of the Zoning Regulations 1- 3 9-1. 109 Rules of Interpretation 1- 3 9-1.110 Public Hearings 1- 6 9-1. 111 Appeal 1- 6 9-1.112 Adjustment 1- 7 9-1.113 Variance 1- 8 9-1.114 Text Amendment 1- 9 9-1. 115 Zoning Map Amendment 1-10 9-1.116 Prezoning 1-11 Chapter 2. Applications - Content, Processing, and Time Limits 9-2.101 Applications and Procedures 2- 1 9-2. 102 Determination of Completeness 2- 1 1 Ordinance No. 68 9-2.103 Waivers of Content 2- 2 9-2.104 Review by Other Agencies 2- 2 9-2.105 Consolidated Processing 2- 2 9-2. 106 Business License Clearance 2- 3 9-2.107 Plot Plan 2- 4 9-2.108 Precise Plan 2- 6 9-2. 109 Conditional Use Permit 2- 8 9-2. 112 Approved Plans 2-11 9-2. 113 Permit Time Limits 2-12 9-2.114 Substantial Site Work Defined 2-12 9-2.115 Project Completion 2-13 9-2.116 Occupancy or Use of Partially Completed - 2-13 Projects 9-2.117 Occupancy with Incomplete Site Improvements 2-14 9-2.118 Extension of Entitlement 2-14 9-2.119 Lapse of Entitlement 2-15 9-2.120 Applications Deemed Approved 2-16 9-2.121 Applications Deemed Withdrawn 2-16 9-2.122 Guarantees of Performance 2-16 Chapter 3. Zoning Districts 9-3.101 Purpose 3- 1 9-3.102 Zoning Districts Established 3- 1 9-3.103 Overlay Districts Established 3- 2 9-3.104 Symbols Used 3 2 9-3.121 A (Agriculture) Zone 3- 4 9-3.141 RS (Residential Suburban) Zone 3- 6 9-3.151 RSF (Residential Single Family) Zone 3-11 9-3.161 LSF (Limited Single Family Residential) Zone 3-16 9-3.171 RMF (Residential Multiple Family) Zone 3-20 9-3.201 CN (Commercial Neighborhood) Zone 3-23 9-3. 211 CP (Commercial Professional) Zone 3-25 9-3. 221 CR (Commercial Retail) Zone 3-27 9-3.231 CS (Commercial Service) Zone 3-30 9-3. 241 CT (Commercial Tourist) Zone 3-32 9-3.251 CPK (Commercial Park) Zone 3-34 9-3.301 IP (Industrial Park) Zone 3-37 9-3.311 I (Industrial) Zone 3-39 9-3.401 L (Recreation) Zone 3-41 9-3.411 LS (Special Recreation) Zone 3-43 9-3. 421 P (Public) Zone 3-45 9-3. 601 FH (Flood Hazard) Overlay Zone 3-47 9-3. 611 GH (Geologic Hazard) Overlay Zone 3-50 9-3. 621 HS (Historic Site) Overlay Zone 3-52 9-3.631 SR (Sensitive Resource) Overlay Zone 3-55 9-3.641 PD (Planned Development) Overlay Zone 3-58 9-3.701 Land Use Descriptions 3-62 2 Ordinance No. 68 Chapter 4. General Site Design and Development Standards 9-4.101 Purpose 4- 1 9-4.102 Applicability of the Standards 4- 1 9-4.103 Setbacks 4- 1 9-4.104 Exception to Setback Standards 4- 1 9-4.105 Use of Setbacks 4- 2 9-4 .106 Front Setbacks 4- 2 9-4.107 Side Setbacks 4- 3 9-4.108 Rear Setbacks 4- 5 9-4.109 Interior Setbacks and Open Area 4- 6 9-4.110 Projections Into Required Setbacks 4- 6 9-4.111 Heights 4- 7 9-4.112 Measurement of Height 4- 7 9-4.113 Height Limitations 4- 7 9-4.114 Parking and Loading 4- 9 9-4.115 Off-Street Parking Required 4- 9 9-4.116 Location of Parking on a Site 4-11 9-4.117 Parking Design Standards 4-11 9-4.118 Required Number of Parking Spaces 4-14 9-4.119 Parking Lot Construction Standards 4-24 9-4 .120 Off-Site Parking 4-26 9-4.121 Off-Street Loading Requirements 4-26 9-4.122 Drive-In and Drive-Through 4-27 Facilities 9-4.123 Driveway Standards for Single 4-28 Family Residential Uses 9-4. 124 Landscaping, Screening and Fencing 4-29 9-4.125 Required Landscaping 4-29 9-4.126 Standards for Landscaping Material 4-30 9-4.127 Landscaping Plans 4-31 9-4.128 Fencing and Screening 4-33 9-4.129 Solid Waste Collection and Disposal 4-36 9-4.130 Signs 4-36 9-4.131 Purpose 4-37 9-4.132 Applicability of Sign Regulations 4-37 9-4.133 Measurement of Sign Area 4-41 9-4.134 Sign Design Standards 4-41 9-4.135 Sign Construction Standards 4-43 9-4.136 Sign Maintenance Required 4-43 9-4.137 Exterior Lighting 4-44 9-4. 138 Grading 4-44 9-4 .139 Grading Plan Required 4-45 9-4.140 Grading Permit Required 4-45 9-4.141 Grading Permit - Application 4-45 3 Ordinance No. 68 Content 9-4.142 Grading Permit Review and Approval 4-47 9-4 .143 Special Grading Standards 4-48 9-4.144 Grading Standards 4-48 9-4.145 Sedimentation and Erosion Control 4-49 9-4.146 Nuisance and Hazard Abatement 4-51 9-4.148 Drainage 4-51 9-4.149 Drainage Plan Required 4-51 9-4.150 Environmental Determination 4-52 Required 9-4.151 Drainage Plan Preparation and 4-52 Content 9-4.152 Drainage Plan Review and Approval 4-53 9-4.153 Plan Check, Inspection and Approval 4-53 9-4.154 Drainage Standards 4-53 9-4.155 Tree Removal 4-54 9-4.156 Tree Removal Permit Required 4-54 9-4.157 Tree Removal Standards 4-55 9-4.158 Street and Frontage Improvements 4-55 9-4.159 Curbs, Gutters and Sidewalks 4-55 9-4.160 Streets 4-57 9-4.162 Archeological Resources 4-58 9-4.163 Exterior Noise Standards 4-58 Chapter 5. Reserved Chapter 6. Special Uses 9-6 .101 Accessory Uses 6- 1 9-6.102 Establishment of an Accessory Use 6- 1 9-6 .103 Accessory Storage 6- 1 9-6.104 Caretaker Residence 6- 5 9-6.105 Home Occupations 6- 5 9-6.106 Residential Accessory Uses 6- 8 9-6 .107 Residential Uses in the Agri- 6- 9 culture Zone 9-6.108 Agricultural Uses - Specialized 6-11 9-6.109 Agricultural Accessory Buildings 6-11 9-6.110 Animal Hospitals 6-12 9-6.111 Kennels 6-12 9-6.112 Farm Animal Raising 6-13 9-6.113 Interim Agricultural Uses 6-18 9-6 .115 Livestock Specialties 6-19 9-6.116 Horticultural Specialties 6-19 9-6.117 Roadside Stands 6-19 4 Ordinance No. 68 9-6.118 Cultural, Education and Recreation Uses 6-21 9-6.120 Churches and related Facilities 6-21 9-6.123 Outdoor Recreation Services 6-21 9-6.124 Rural Sports and Group Facilities 6-22 9-6.125 Schools and Preschools 6-24 9-6.126 Industrial Uses 6-25 9-6.128 Food and Kindred Products 6-25 9-6.129 Fuel Dealers 6-25 9-6.130 Collection Stations 6-25 9-6.131 Recycling and Scrap 6-26 9-6.133 Medical and Social Care Facilities 6-27 9-6.134 Skilled Nursing and Personal 6-27 Care 9-6.135 Residential Care Facilities 6-27 9-6 .137 Outdoor Commercial Uses 6-27 9-6.139 Sales Lots and Swap Meets 6-27 9-6.140 Storage Yards 6-29 9-6.141 Residential Uses 6-30 9-6 .142 Individual Mobilehomes 6-30 9-6.143 Mobilehome Parks 6-32 9-6.145 Organizational Houses 6-40 9-6.147 Resource Extraction 6-33 9-6.148 Resource Extraction Wells 6-34 9-6.149 Drilling Permit Requirements6-34 9-6.150 Development Standards 6-34 9-6.151 Surface Mining and Reclamation •6-37 9-6 .152 Surface Mining Practices 6-38 9-6.153 Permit Requirements for Surface 6-38 Mining 9-6.154 Reclamation Plan 6-39 9-6.155 Guarantee of Reclamation' 6-41 9-6.156 Public Records 6-41 9-6 .157 Periodic Review 6-41 9-6.158 Nuisance Abatement 6-41 9-6.159 Underground Mining 6-41 9-6.160 Permit Requirement 6-41 9-6.161 Surface Operations 6-42 9-6.162 Retail Trade 6-42 9-6.163 Auto and Vehicle Dealerships 6-42 9-6.164 Automobile Service Stations 6-42 9-6.165 Building Materials Sales 6-44 9-6.168 Automobile Repair or Services 6-44 9-6.172 Temporary Uses 6-55 9-6 .174 Seasonal or Temporary Sales 6-55 9-6.175 Temporary Off-Site Construction 6-56 Yard 9-6.176 Temporary Dwellings and Offices 6-57 5 Ordinance No. 68 • 0 9-6.177 Temporary Events 6-58 9-6.180 Recreational Vehicle (RV) Parks 6-59 9-6.183 Vehicle Storage 6-61 Chapter 7 . Nonconforming Uses 9-7 .101 Purpose 7 1 9-7.102 Nonconforming Use Defined 7- 1 9-7.103 Right to Continue a Nonconforming Use 7- 1 9-7.104 Issued Building Permit 7- 1 9-7.105 Nonconformity Due to Lack of Entitlement 7- 1 9-7 .106 Nonconforming Uses of Land 7- 1 9-7.107 Nonconforming Use of a Conforming Building 7- 2 9-7.108 Nonconforming Structures 7- 2 9-7.109 Nonconforming Signs 7- 3 9-7.110 Destroyed Structures and Signs 7- 3 9-7.111 Nonconforming Parking 7- 4 9-7.112 Substitution of Use 7- 4 9-7.113 Nonconforming Lot Defined 7- 4 9-7.114 Use of Nonconforming Lots 7- 4 Chapter 8. Enforcement. 9-8. 101 Purpose 8- l 9-8.102 Enforcement Responsibility 8- 1 9-8 .103 Citation 8- 1 9-8.104 Enforcement Hearings 8- 2 9-8 .105 Revocation of Approval and Forfeiture of 8- 3 Bond 9-8.106 Nuisance Defined 8- 4 9-8 .107 Abatement of Nuisance 8- 4 9-8.108 Interference Prohibited 8- 7 Chapter 9. General Definitions 9-9 .101 Purpose 9- 1 9-9.102 General Definitions 9- 1 Apartment House of Multiple Dwelling Unit 9- 2 Building Face 9- 3 Commission 9- 4 Council 9- 5 Density 9- 6 Exploration 9- 7 Frontage 9- 8 Junk Yard 9- 9 6 Ordinance 68 a ce No. Lot Depth - p 9 10 Non-Residential Use ; 9-11 Person 9-12 Public Utility _ 9-13 Rest Home 9-14 Setback, Interior 9-15 Sign, Monument 9-16 Sound Level Meter 9-17 Structural Alteration 9-18 Use 9-19 Zoning Approval 9-20 7 1 • _M_E_M_0_R_A_N_D_U_M_ TO: City Council FROM: City Manager SUBJECT: Report from Police Facilities and Building Renovation Committee DATE: May 18, 1983 The following concerns the "Police Location and Building Renova- tion Committee Report," submitted to Council at the; meeting of May 9 , 1983. The Committee report recommended purchase and renovation of the Bank of America Building on Traffic Way as the primary means for pro- viding a police facility. The report states that renovation costs would be $30,000 with a purchase price of $340,000 or less in cash. Although not stated in the report, it has been expressed that a $240,000 purchase price might be possible. As of this date, nothing is definitive at that price. Accordingly, this analysis notes the lower price, but assumes the $340,000 figure as provided by the Com- mittee. The second Committee choice was to construct a new facility at an approximate cost of $500,000. The third, and least attractive choice insofar as the Committee is concerned, is to renovate existing space on the first and second floors of the Administration Building as outlined in previous Capital Improvement Plans adopted by Council. We have reviewed the primary Committee recommendation on the basis of total cost and have attempted to analyze the financial impact on the attached five year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) . We have considered outright cash purchase and alternatively examined a ten year lease/purchase arrangement even though the Bank has indicated that they are not interested in lease purchase. The figures used in the analysis are based on a cash price of $340,000 plus $103,000 for renovation, furnishings and site improvement costs. Staff does not agree with the $30,000 figure shown in the Committee' s report, since it appears that consideration was not given to parking lot modifica- tions, drainage and security improvements which are necessary. Considering a cash purchase plus improvements totalling $443,000, the Five Year CIP (Exhibit A) is revised to provide examples of the impact in the CIP. As an example, it would be necessary to eliminate all but already obligated lease/purchase and restricted fund expendi- tures from 1983/84 fiscal year programs. Examples are shown on Exhi- bit A-1. The major effect of this action would be that almost all projects shown on the current CIP are either eliminated or extended beyond their original dates. Especially significant would be the de Police Facilities and Building Renovation lay of the Administration Building renovation involving postponing of heating improvements as well as some public counter and workspace areas until Fiscal year 1986/87 . At least six major projects would be affected, e.g. , Fire truck acquisition, Dial-ARide bus replacement, park development, etc. Assuming a lease/purchase arrangement for a ten year period, the CIP would be revised (Exhibit B) to delay or eliminate some major projects, e.g. , fire truck, park development, fuel storage, etc. The Administration Building renovation, i.e. , public counter, heating, could be accomplished in Fiscal Year 1983/84. Significantly, however, this arrangement would commit $83,400 annually for the next ten years at assumed prevailing interest rates and would result in a real cost of $800,000 to $900,000. Maintenance costs of an estimated $30,000 per year must be added to this amount. This commitment would serious- ly impact our cash flow and capital improvement projects by using ap- proximately one-half of available non-restricted funds for the life of the lease/purchase agreement. It is important to note that all past, and present, Staff consid- erations of renovating the Administration Building provided for ground level access by the public for police operations. Also provided are separate and discrete access for the handling and booking of prisoners with no opportunity for mixing with the general public or requiring any use of the rest of the building for booking or prisoner handling functions. The conceptual floor plans and cost estimates, attached as Exhi- • bit C, show the sequence of renovation for police facilities within the Administration Building. Thus, Phase I could provide 1200 square feet of the west wing of second floor at a total cost of $24,000. This would be an interim location until the library lease expired (1985) or until alternate library facilities were found. In this re- gard, County Library personnel acknowledge a need to find alternate facilities regardless of the Police facility location. Some consider- ation and analysis is presently underway considering various options. In any event, it is apparent that the Library question still needs to be resolved within the near future. With resolution of the Library location, Phase II would remodel first floor space presently occupied by the adult library as well as provide some functional changes in the portion of the second floor renovated during Phase I. Total cost of Phase II is estimated at $98,400 for a total cost of $122,000. This would provide adequate facilities for police functions in an effective and economical way for the foreseeable future. It must be noted that aside from the area shown in the attached sketch, the Administration Building offers plenty of space for support Police activities such as storage or locker space. All public activities would be contained to the first floor with separation from the rest of the building. Please note that the conceptual sketches provide for locker space on the sec- ond floor, but if the Police Department doubled its size, this space could be converted to other uses with lockers and changing rooms moved to the third floor. Such a move would only affect Police personnel and not the public in general. • 2 Police Facilities and Building Renovation Both Phase I and Phase II would provide a total of approximately 3,300 square feet of administrative and operational office space dedi- cated to police use. Additional storage space is available in the basement on the third floor if'`needed. Floor space considerations should acknowledge that all members of the Police Department are not on duty at any one time. Therefore, space requirements should be sized in anticipation of functional uses per shift, not on total de- partment size. With this consideration, ample space exists in the Administration Building with provision of certain modifications. Thus, provision of police facility within theAdministration Building could be accomplished in two phases for a total estimated cost of $122,000 . Phase I could provide relief from space restrictions this year and Phase II later, depending on the Library situation. After a thorough evaluation of the Committee report and in con- sideration of foreseeable factors with great emphasis placed on the City' s cash flow and fiscal resources, the Phase I and Phase II ap- proach as shown herein appears the most effective use of public facil- ities considering operational and fiscal requirements. Some of the more important factors behind this recommendation are as follows: 1. Cost difference: $122,400 as opposed to a cost ranging from $340,000 to $443,000 or with a new building in excess of $500,000. 2. Adding another building to the City inventory would substan- tially increase building maintenance costs. Based on current utility, janitorial, maintenance, and utility costs, the Bank of America building would require an added expenditure of up to $30,000 per year aside from purchase costs. 3. Either outright cash purchase or lease/purchase of the Bank of America building would seriously impact every other capi- tal program shown in the draft Five Year CIP. Many programs would be delayed with some being eliminated. The Council, however, may wish to change CIP projects. 4. Separation of City functions would result in a loss of ease of communication and inter-management contact. Some duplica- tion of materials or equipment would also result. 5. Relocation of the police facility outside the Administration Building would vacate space within the building without de- creasing operating costs and necessitate consideration of how this space should be used. Some suggstions have been ad- vanced indicating commercial office rental. This may be pos- sible and certainly should be considered, although the ques- tion still remains as to the need for the City to do so if the present building, as modified, can adequately support police operations. 6. Relocating the police function from the Administration Build- ing would eliminate any security benefits due to the 24-hour police presence within the building. 3 f Police Facilities and Building Renovation 7. Page 3 of Exhibit C shows a conceptual plan for the first floor renovation during Phase II. This plan provides all police administrative functions in one wing of the building, with outside access to- the area for both business and en- forcement functions. Internal police activities, i.e. , squad rooms, briefing, etc. , are provided on the second floor. This plan avoids contact of the general public and general activities within the Administration Building with some of the less desirable aspects of police activities. It would provide for a secure discrete area for prisoner handling and provides_ for an outside access for both police and police client functions as well as opportunities for expansion. Staff consideration has also been given to the concept of building a new facility vs. purchase of the Bank of America structure with the conclusion that dollar for dollar, a new structure would be preferred over the Bank of America building. However , this option presents the same cash flow problems and impact upon major projects as does pur- chase of the Bank of America building. It has been suggested that the issue of raising money for building or purchase of a police facility should be placed before the voters for approval as a surcharge for purchase or construction. This could be done at a special election or by joining with the School District election in November of 1983. It should be noted, however , that the costs of separate maintenance, utilities, etc. , still would have an impact on our fiscal resoures. I know that this issue can become an emotional one. The fiscal needs of this city, the desire to provide improved zoo facilities, the desire to enhance our recreational plant as well as the myriad other demands for City services including transit, road maintenance, fire and medical aid services, dictates a hard look at what are the priori- ties for expending limited city funds. Under present circumstances, all of these requirements cannot be met. Some hard choices are, therefore, in order. I have attempted to provide an analysis of our resources and I have done so in full consultation with Staff. I must emphasize, however , that it is only the City Council that can make this important decision. As a staff p person, I fully recognize that relationship. You should be cognizant of the impacts of your decision and whatever it is to provide staff with a clear-cut ordering of your collective priorities. I assure you that whatever your decision, the Staff will do everything in its power to assure that your decision is implemented as timely and economically as possible. M RAY WARDEN LW:a encl. 4 co �co 1�q) C) o �' ©� o • Lr) To f co 1� tri- C) O O O O O r- O O O O O O 00 O Cr O I o 1 O O 1 O O l0 Ln N 1.0 1 O 00 N tet' rI O O m 0) N M Ln ri t!} V)- 1 h l0 O O O O O O ri co O O O 1 O 1 O O S•4 Ln 1 O O . b� 00 Ln a% l0 O Cal N r-I ri O O 910 �� 1 $4 1-4 a v} to C k H 4J WWrz N i C-1 W fz > C) O O Q I 00 0 0 i O �b p 1 H O coo Ln co r I 0) N to 4J tom!? H 04 D U � In S-I N f o � i M . O 00 Co �° I Nl Cv, Ln © �. d Cal N U),Q CN M i/} t? W rti U f~ s~ +) N cd O s~ N LAS * s~ r +-) I r I r I d-) t tp� € Ckl i r. r� N N cid :2: O 41 � N � O C"' l } w Cal 1•.I ID4 Q rtS ri r I N m Q U Q -� E � � p a Q Q a, rI I r♦ v CO 4-J F�4 L9t _ w a cn H 'o � c. �• w P4 2 a o n'- L ji t � 00 0 co co OD . 0 ' • CN 4 C) 0 0 0 co O O �. 0 O o o C) o C-0 Ln al N N N • r•-I I N � cr CO- CD h N 00 p0 CD O O p p 0 O O O 00 NLO Ol O 61 r-1 N W a Q w �� x o p 0 o p p o 0 U o o O o I U] I 0 o O 0 CC) Ln H d> N (N 00 O 00 Z H N H 'W Ln CzlCN O H a P4 �, 00 C) 0 0 0 H � O � O O O a pM O O O 00 O O0 E-t r-i f H r-I N H 4 v U EQ P4 a) � ar 3 � Ln � Q) � a N a o a v Q4 a 4-) r-q P4 U) ra 4 4, ru Ln ,-, +J a) +� o oO 04 1 " ,1 v � � > O fL4 r N Q E 4-) O M04 O •1-) k 04j -rq LO to rq0 + z3rn Q rn 3 a 4-) a) O a o w .- r-, 1 O a) Q) C7 a3i Q U En ¢' C] a) U U o U Qv., N a) U U W CO Ln -q � 0 U Ep rt1 aa� � `° a u a w 4-4 a a q O C$ O O �. co O ® O O t\ D o 0 rn `° 4n` - ,n uifn CY) M V?• V} V]• V} t` O O a q O O IC) O l0 O co q r1 lQ p O co p O C) O ' CC) w ko ' a% r-•i VIP [zl a . Q w co o d CD o U I p ; to v I I C co W M $` H m tn- r4 M O q O O O6 0 H I O O O fJ Ol r-I N l® ' G U N m � r te U) -P a U] N O �4 m 4-1 ¢, o I v ra H N I~ EQ r-1 < 4 b a v 3 v ani m A �s � W -114 0 rO a) v + m w ,.$ U 2 U 0 0 a 00 00a o _ a o 00 Q 00 w rH co o 1 © er O L k O o � � o o LO � i co CD On r-I t/� W : Ln co a a x m o Ei rn w co CD in M o � a Ms°i ► a o, r a ry �1 E-A '�I CU } A4 � r ° U f~ aJ 4j •rl 1 (A O in 04O ro ai °i 0 o o •r� A 4J I N � p A U > � ro � , o a x fa 4J a4 0 rO 4JI 0 r-i J:'. � 0 a s~ w a) ° a o ro o 0� m •'� 3 +� o s~ U x � -H ro COU 0 5 s~ >1 41 E > � � aJ J� s° 3 v �4 a a v a a c°n C( C • o O b C O L3 O C3 O p ' ` o m m S s C o:) o C 1 C C co t` Ol p p M M lfl p O coC C 1 C O tr) co r-q m p O H M red w� a a! 0 U � o 0 o b ;1 E+ rn N L oc 13 14 c� w L > r•i 40 a w 1�r 0 08 0� H co o a 0 o a FC kD rn p r4 E-+ r-t c`i H HNP L4 — JA } U Q) U 1 >~ U rd � >~ �4 U) 4.) 4-) N �4 04 •� O N 44 ,� fN U Ea U) rd 4j 04 rci 4 U Q)Ql k U U) rtS }4 X H I N 4-) Q) b U) U) 1 � ro 04 o a �' Q) N 4-JN H l4 r-i S t 0 x >~ •r-n Q) U •r-I .� > l I •ri O .�G r q ri ro U Q) rtf N O (d N 4 � •� r-+ Q) •ri O r•-I U) U O m r•-I P4 Lr) 0 N r-I Gr coQ OO O `�O j DC7 00 �G7 O t� O `C� Q �O O • ► ]. r U ► N Ln O ow Ol 00 mi O O O �O • O I` O O O O Nd O co O O O I �Q I �`-C O I ► � ► O 1► O ► ilo Ln CN w Mo 00 N cr r•1 i Ol Ln vl- lO O O 0 (p r 00 O O J D 100 tO r3 I o o I Mg i N� o , �n S4 - o o - tT co Ln m0 i O N ri a `p -41 rz N O P4 p LO o O 4,$ o 0 'bt` W � co 0 o ccs © o r► A I o o o a1 i m In co ri N Ln R' -P ri Q., f� N ('N .^ I oo 0 o c+ O Q o � zQ `?� to I O p C I _ o Oco C) 001 4 - (n N N '�} I ice} t11 M S. V fYl ' t00 U -- r0 U 11, Ln .P -P N -P cd O I~ � ffi 12+ -P p -WtT � $4 04 Q trd O •4 rA La 0+ A U N U •rl r-1 x N ty N U Cl •rI E •14 p S•a A N -r1 I i-1 rTj 0 4.) %�t 13 dt $ r-I Z .Q Cil a w H � 1' 0- .11 •11 O O O �a ^ w a z a E-+ , ! � cs� LZ - 00 00 C) �o 0 dl O N N r p O i. 00 O O O O O O �- O O l0 C O CO O1 Ln N N N NI O O O O O 1 Ln O O O O co Ol Ln NO 0) r•-I N r-i rl W a Q U 0o o C o o o u� �r o o O Co H rn % co 0 0 7+ r N N r -cr Ln W t/� CN W O a P4 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hpi O O O O O O p M % 0 O O O a co (D O Lr) o < m , I ,-a 00 0 00 [-i H N r-1 r1 N H P4 v V} U Ef) a4 N � N ri U O N 3 l4 Ln �q :J N N 4-)�4 S24 04 N 0 R, v > En Q4 104 4J b a tr r o m a I Q) a U '� '4 H � 0 o a 3r , � v -i-) p ch 04 o 4-) Q U U U o N N I Q N 0 � � � (o 0 H ri 4-4 a a r-+ v a 04 a aw F o oo a 0 0 o o o r� Oj O O O O yO O O O r c $10 Lf) r-•I `v r p o i- N p O i p O 1 ' 10 p rn 10 p } co O ! 1C) Lo 1 p O r-i W a Q o $ 7 U �i o O Q i cA cr o z H '� mCh O � 000 00 po po €+ H I o 0 0 to rn rcl H N U i ttS 0 4-) � � p to � N � sa4 N U rl 0 S4 ul r1 04 a in' N H '� N Q1 r-1 �4 rd ro 104 1 N 3 U N N A 4 La >� t7' s~ W •rl U ra 04 .� 0 rtf S4 Q-: N d1 •r1 U ctY I U +) to 0 4-) U Q E r-•1 U r � ra r-1 ° Z U uu a Q 00 n O C4 - 00 M_ O � trrON , r-I ( +* Q Q Ala 1 v Cb 9 z ' W !��' C` O Co C4 � Q0 �O C1U C) q Ln O 00 ' b Cr l`'x tD t!} W a a v00ul 00 It- V- ' w > "-Zr o �+ a �r o �, 00 0 H I O OU4 O H .-I Cll ice: b O "1 t? � U • N U f~ Cd .N U UI U 4-) rl U) S~ O O N N H I is `'' r ,� x 0 o 0 0 U s U�� rd a o ro �, N 1 0 �,•� + �a a �4 a :j, ° 1 ° m (0N O En .04 TO 44 .I aG 5 -� > 04r a a 0 a a, U) a a a l .-:yam • 0 I c Q Q • O it t� A o I ` W I 00 Q i jy C r i ri � i. i co) M t!} R1 CD 00 00 d Q1 C I Vt ` tom' ri tde) WI a Q! b o Co LO tz7 N LO °P4 0 o 0 0 o H I Q p a co c.iC11 o CN m H E-q '-i M P4 U • N U � U S:� �4 tv a-J .J U) 04 o m t° 4 U cn m ro a N �4 N 04 I U Pa �4 En I 04 0 N °r-ii w .X f: •n N U ri ,5� > U� s.4 -ri O X r-I r1 ro U U ro O ro �4 U r-I Q., H �". S4 3 a o 4 �4U o 3-i I-i U 0 +J 4-) H v •° 4 o r m u om —4 .t� �4 +J E~ E-+ a 44 ro E-1 ,-i � a vii Q Ln a o N .� ��. r F+ ` O - a - a------------- '20 O o buzpToH 44 � �z�zod�uos � cin 41 0 X rl m O � +j o 124 'Z • 4.4 �j ca (D o rq a • � S-4 N U a o d ` 4J U) l � � � O t '� � � ori UO 3 O 3 04 O, 41 W r N x > 3 3 PMTTPH .zo•rza-.ul �4 3 r cn O �4 r's a 3 Q a i � O O O H E-+ E-1 r I —4 r..l u] 4J U U W ro 0 uul ai •H a) Q r-4 4-) U N O 4~ N 44 > r a > Hoa f - 4n _ �4 O4a -P b� O Cd 4J N OH S4 to U r-i Q N -r-1 U rl > 4-4 N 4-4 U H O H 7 V • •4J V/ / i 1 J 0 `} D O `N J aN ` -1 1 � Q) m 3 c o � 0 � h r1 co a) O Q) •.4 a 4-i rR q� Ll- O J � o yam. may) jUaO 3 3 H r r a 04 .� ax U) 3 3 � N T'2MTTPH 'JO-mogul o 3 o u � ri p Fa � p m •,11 O •-1 O o - a) x w Q :3: Q 1 ED a) a) -0 Id r° r° H H CJS L� U U W rd ` U) 3GL Ra O a Q 1 - l 0 .N 4J ul o L' � �a F•-i C'3 r r-1 r C I Y OF AT/ 1SCA SRO �ti,rAwQa, i:`� DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS RTp+ X� rl c., rea.w1e I 8, 1979 g z \ � S `h G n u - a • the s- � ?s _ - � � lam• `-�.. SL- co s c }L r - y f 31— +sj�• i , LEVIONS Date4P �- fi DRAWN: CHECKED: APPROVED DATE: STY OF ATASCAtERO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS -s4 F, Lobby 'X s' 320 _ REVISIONS Date DRAWN: CHECKED: APPROVED: DATE: LZ o o Z41 000 1500 ! <2 — Z" 7f 00�� oaa . NNN NNN /zoo ¢i CSO 0 NNN NOS ♦ 4,00 2 , S 127-1 4oQ ORDINANCE.N0. 6 6 • AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO AMENDING FALCON CABLE T.V. OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE BY EXTENDING AREA OF SERVICE ZONE • The Council of the City of Atascadero Ordains as follows: Section 1: That Exhibit "A" of County Ordinance No. 1504, adopted on June 2, 1975, and subsequently adopted by the City of Atascadero in Ordinance No. 2, dated July 2, 1979, be amended by Exhibit "A" of this Ordinance, attached and incorporated by reference herein, and by this same reference approved. Section 2: Resolution 47-82 adopted certain conditions and procedures pursuant to extending service areas to the CATV franchise holder. As enabled in Resolution 47-82, service installation charges for the areas added to the CATV service area under this franchise shall be as follows: Area 1 - $154.75 Area 2 - 194.74 Area 3 - 104.61 Area 4 - 199.18 Area 5 - 159.11 Area 6 - 135.19 Area 7 - 274.55 Section 3: The City Clerk shall cause this Ordinance to be published once within fifteen (15) days after its passage in the Atascadero News, a newspaper of general circulation printed, published and circulated in this City in accordance with Section 36933 of the Government Code; shall certify the adoption of this Ordinance; and shall cause this Ordinance and its certification to be entered in . the Book of Ordinances of this City. Section 4: This ordinance shall go into effect and be in full force and effect at 12:01 on the thirty-first (31st) day after passage. The foregoing ordinance was introduced on and adopted at a regular meeting of the Council held on AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ROLFE NELSON, Mayor ATTEST: PATSY A. HESTER, Deputy City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ALLEN GRIMES, City Attorney APP V AS TO CO NT: MUjkA• Y/Y WARDEN, City Ma ager t \ l =�-a -2 ^ . la r"1 S G - • M •is ,'i �` �x e� /. c t (d 0 # Ln WFl. U c. G a,zl- + N •rl N $4 M W v /LLJ •i eI S r . tr rd AAA 1 'm� +z�- is +- � •� �,• a p 1 w, 1 _ a i, La l _ ,`� 1 a S• r/ q '7. e �• a - .-�. a.•. �� rr✓�� a �*�` �Ct ',•�i s,z f9� a ° oa• + s. a 91� J _ $ � — 4 '\`y\ - PrP t t -/e i Z •a� " �-_' WK M - �.,� ) C L 3 �} w' ��l,'1. 'Gf�� T,•� /�1 ,a �� -�2 _ •pe I i�\�3 ra.�xA e A \ _�•a',. l i 3G,�'5'Y��' ./.J�W t1, i•��Efr� ��' \'_ � r�cry z �� y� � .� r�" a ,� Y A y�x a •t C. I(:d r, � ��i -„r`.a.ylp� is'�Y«llh' �^• f / z a� \p a •+ a s� ars a•(,� •h��- .a � a s - p 'n d rl 00 rl bl Ln (” Ln a� - a z • a� O d' moi' m 6 V' 1 Lfl •-i.. r '_ _``-/ r-1 rl H H rl rl N A- •_ c x_ TL 71. �1! ' `-"�"—"'_ �.—�` i�.�� •`\r-r ,� >,�'-�/ - .-_' r•CH r1 N M d' Ln l4 r- �4 �4 �4 �4 �4 s4 A ..ti �rl �� ;�� .? 1 .� �� ✓ ��y _ s� '� 'J�'i FII'i F('i � (-I�i FCi FI'i F('i L-�r � a"y(�� . is 03 ORDINANCE NO. 67 E AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO ADDING --- CHAPTER 6 TO TITLE 2 OFzTHE ATASCADERO MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY The Council of the City of Atascadero ordains as follows: Section 1. Chapter 6 is added to Title 2 of the Atascadero Municipal Code relating to claims against the City to read as fol- lows: TITLE 2. ADMINISTRATION Chapter 6. Claims Against the City Sec. 2-6. 01. General The provisions of this chapter recognize that the general claims procedures applicable to local public agencies, including this City, are governed by the provisions of Chapter 1 of Division 3 . 6 of the Government Code of the State, commencing with Section 900 and fol- lowing. Sec. 2-6. 02. Special claims procedures. • Pursuant to the authority contained in Section 935 of the Gov- ernment Code of the State, the following claims procedures are es- tablished for those claims against the City for money or damages not now governed by State or local laws: (a) Employee claims. Notwithstanding the exceptions contained in Section 905 of the Government Code of the State, all claims by public officers or employees for fees, salaries, wages, overtime pay, holiday pay, compensating time off, or vacation pay, sick leave pay, and any other expenses or allowances claimed due from the City, when a procedure for processing such claims is not otherwise provided by State or local laws, shall be presented within the time limitations and in the manner prescribed by Sections 910 through 915. 2 of the Government Code of the State. Such claims shall further be subject to the provisions of Section 945. 4 of the Government Code of the State relating to the prohibitions of suits in the absence of the presentation of claims and action thereon by the Council . (b) Contract and other claims. In addition to the require- ments of subsection (a) of this section, and notwithstanding the exemptions set forth in Section 905 of the Government Code of the State, all claims against the City for damages or money, when a procedure for processing such claims is not otherwise provided by State or local laws, shall be presented within the time limitations and in the manner prescribed by Sections 910 through 915. 2 of the AG: fr -1- 4/21/83 I Government Code of the State. Such claims shall further be subject • to the provisions of Section 945. 4 of the Government Code of the State relating to the prohibitions of suits in the absence of the presentation of claims and action thereon by the Council . Section 2. The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published once within fifteen (15) days after its passage in the Atascadero News, a newspaper of general circulation, printed, pub- lished and circulated in this City in accordance with Section 36933 of the Government Code; shall certify the adoption of this ordinance; . and shall cause this ordinance and its certification to be entered in the Book of Ordinances of this City. Section 3. This ordinance shall go into effect and be in full force and effect at 12: 01 on the thirty-first (31st) day after its passage. The foregoing ordinance was introduced on and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on AYES: NOES: ABSENT: • ROLFE NELSON, Mayor ATTEST: BARBARA NORRISV City Clerk APPROVED AS TO ORM: ALLEN GRIMES, City Attorney APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: MURRAY L. WARDEN, City Manager -2- CITY OF PISMO BEACH, CALIFORNIACITY HALL 1000 BELLO PISMO BEAC 46M.16r,14A • TELEPHONE 111M V z_ April 26, 1983 Mr. Murray Warden City Manager City of Atascadero 6500 Palma Avenue Atascadero, CA 93423 Dear Murray: On April 11, 1983 the City Council passed a resolution expressing opposition to language entitled "Compromise between National League of Cities and National Cable Television Association on Federal Cable Legislation We are asking for your support in opposing this compromise by passing a resolution like the one attached. Thank you in advance for your consideration and support. Sincerely, Vty�az� and L. Gibbs Administrator RLG:cle Enc. RESOLUTIO'', NO. 1703 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PISMO BEACH OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA EXPRESSING OPPOSITION TO LANGUAGE • ENTITLED "COMPROMISE BETWEEN NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES AND NATIONAL CABLE TELEVISION ASSOCIATION ON FEDERAL CABLE LEGISLATION WHEREAS, under the existing state law, the governing body of a city, county, or city and county may grant a cable television franchise; and WHEREAS, the City of Pismo Beach has issued a franchise to a cable operator to provide cable services; WHEREAS, on March 4, 1933, the National League of Cities and the National Cable Television Association agreed to compromise language regarding federal cable legislation which substantially impacts said franchise agreement; and WHEREAS, the Board of the National League of Cities approved this language on March 6, 1983; and WHEREAS, specific provisions in said compromise language are in direct conflict with local laws which have been enacted by the City of Pismo Beach: 1) The definition of concurrent jurisdiction between local franchising authorities and the federal government removes the areas of access, service and facility requirements, renewal or extension of franchises, among the other areas from exclusive local jurisdiction. 2) Cable operator will no longer be contractually bound to provide services originally offered. 3) Renewal tests as outlined are vague and will result in essentially automatic renewal of franchise. 4) Requirement that all franchises be brought into compliance within one year impairs contracts fairly and voluntarily negotiated and is a usurpation of local government' s rights; and WHEREAS, the Board of the National League of Cities should have consulted with its member cities prior to approving said compromise language. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Pismo Beach opposes the compromise language as approved by the Board of the National League of Cities. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City of Pismo Beach urge the Board of the League of California Cities to oppose the compromise as approved by the National League of Cities on March 6, 1983. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City of Pismo Beach forward its specific concerns to the NLC, its congressional delegation and urge the League of Californ� Cities to work with its member cities to develop specific legislative provisions to protect the ability of local jurisdictions to -negotiate and enforce local cable franchises. L_ On motion of Councilperson FEldwaven , seconded by Councilperson HuLbard, and on the following roll call vote, to alit: AYES: Eldwayen, Hubbard, Mellow, Richardson NOES: None ABSENT: Carter the foregoing resolution is passed and adopted this day of , _ 1983. !� T�ill Richardson, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORA: Marion I. Houston, UIC A. i Sr- , Jr. Ci�y Clerk Cit Attorney 0 M E M O R A N D U M TO: CITY MANAGER May 17, 1983 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: Complaint regarding sand mining in the Salinas River This matter was continued from the meeting of April 25 to allow the Atascadero Mutual Water Company (owners of the affected prop- erty) to respond to the complaints by area residents. The Atas- cadero Mutual Water Company Board is meeting on May 18 to discuss the matter and will have a representative at the Council meeting. There is no additional information beyond that contained in the previous staff memorandum on this matter. LAWRENCE STEVENSRAY L. WARDEN Planning Director C ty anager Ps • • • RESOLUTION NO. 25-83 RESOLUTION OF THE ATASCADERO CITY COU IN SUPPORT OF SENATOR-WILSON' S BILL, S.1103 , PLACING A MORATORIUM ON OFFSHORE OIL DRILLING IN THE OCS WHEREAS, the economy of San Luis Obispo County is dependent on commercial fishing, recreation, tourism and agriculture; and WHEREAS, San Luis Obispo County has clean air that will be de- graded by offshore oil drilling activities, resulting in violations of the State and Federal health ambient air quality standards because of weaknesses in the- current Federal Department of the Interior air qual- ity regulations; and WHEREAS, Central California spectacular scenic coastline is also a critical habitat for diverse bird and marine life, deserving of pro- tection and preservation including the threatened southern sea otter ; and WHEREAS, offshore oil development in Central California coastal waters at this time poses a serious threat to the coastal economy of San Luis Obispo County because of impacts from projected oil spills, degradation of air quality resources and conflicts with other uses of the offshore and coastal areas; and • WHEREAS, Senator Wilson has introduced in the Congress of the United States a bill, S.1103; and WHEREAS, Senator Wilson' s bill would place a moratorium on off- shore drilling activity on the Outer Continental Shelf in Central and Northern California north of the Santa Maria River (N808) to the Ore- gon Border and in certain other areas of California until 1994; and WHEREAS, this legislation does not include nine sensitive tracts south of N808 between the coast and Lease Sale 53 , now being con- sidered for lease under Sale No. 73 ; and WHEREAS, Senator Wilson' s bill would permit opening of these areas in the event of a national emergency as determined by the President. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Atascadero in the County of San Luis Obispo, State of California, hereby adopts this resolution in general support of Senator Wilson' s bill, S.1103, and directs that copies of this resolution be forwarded to all appropriate members of Congress and other interested agencies and officials. We urge that this legislation be amended to include the nine tracts south of N808 described above and to include provision that any opening of OCS moratorium areas by the President be with concurrence of both Houses of Congress. L Resolution No. 25-83 On motion by Councilman and seconded by Councilman , the foregoing resolution in hereby adopted in its en- tirety on the following vote: z AYES: NOES : ABSENT: ADOPTED: ROLFE NELSON, Mayor ATTEST: BARBARA NORRIS, City Clerk APPROVED AS T FORM; .-.....�A • LII ALLEN GRIMES, City Attorney APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: MURRAY L. WARDEN, City Manager • 2 • -ORIGINALLY INCLUDEDIN LEASE SALE 73 PROPOSAL BUT SUBJECT TO FISCAL YEAR 1983 INTERIOR FUNDING BAN EXTENDING FROM OREGON BORDER TO MORRO BAY JIMPOSED BY CONGRESS) AREA .SHOWN MONTEREY CO. IN DETAIL SAN LUIS OBISPO CO. tS'G� 9 _ ul �O,9tr �C� SAN SIMEON Z oa: 9�F CAMBRIA vOi Z 9S CAYUCOS w O w a MORRO BAY CC w a BIRD SANCTUARY a -'- - SALE g cc 53 PT.BUCHON SAN LUIS OBISPO a p O PT SAN LUIS Iz Z TRACTS AVILA BEACH dO O 3� S bc�'�- s`` 7"f IN PISMO BEACH GROVER CITY a m LITIGATION 1 OCEANO ARROYO GRANDE SANTA BARBARA L ♦+ �+ 'P'r+ .A SALE T SAL CO. 53 SANTA �c jam. Yak MARIA Z PURISIMA ,T r LEASED PT. 2�izzc �f (DRILLING �. ' _ UNDERWAY) LOMPOC a -+�r PT /H /v*drJkri!/M .g ARGUELLO PT CONCEPTION LEASE SALE 73 PROPOSED FOR OCTOBER 1983 i TO CONCERNED AGENCIES AND ORGANIZATIONS FROM CENTRAL CALIFORNIA COASTAL COALITION RE LEGISLATION PLACING MORATORIUM ON OFFSHORE OIL DRILLING For your information we are enclosing sample resolutions, copies of Senator Wilson' s Bill and Senator Cranston-Representative Panetta' s Bill, an information sheet describing their differences, and suggested distribution list. We encourage your agency or organization to consider a resolution supporting either the Wilson bill or Cranston-Panetta bills with suggested modifications and that you send copies of this resolution to those on the distribution list. We also ask that you send letters to the appropriate Congressional committee chairmen urging early consideration and support of these bills with mod i f i cat i ons. Tracts being considered under Sale No. 73 will be leased in the Fall so it is vital that this legislation be considered this year. Your active support is essential to early passage of this legislation. Please give this issueyourimmediate attention. Thank you. For further information contact us at P. O. Box 4242, San Luis Obispo, Ca. 13340n3. 67/' t1 c�C6nJ�� /t"�Btq�i��ars Old i?4 ` . OFFSHORE OIL DRILLING MORATORIUM LEGISLATION Bilis to place a moratorium on offshore oft drilling along several key areas of California and Massachusetts have been introduced into Congress. These bills differ in the fallowing respects: CRANSTON-PANETTA RILLS Bill Numbers - HR 20555 (H=ouse version) ; S 760 (Senate version) Areas Covered - All of central and northern CAlifornia from the Santa Maria River mouth (N808) to Oregon Border; The Hickle Preserve and buffer zone offshore of the City of Santa Barbara; Channel Islands National Marine Sanctuary; tracts within Santa Monica Bay; lc mile buffer between Newport Beach and the Mexican border; major areas in the Georges Bank off of Massachusetts. Duration of Moratorium - Unit l Year 2000 for California offshore areas and parts of Georges Bank. Other parts of area off Massachusetts protected until 1594. Introduced in House by Representataive Leon Panetta and Gerry Studds (D-MA) and in Senate by Senator Alan Cranston and Edward Kennedy (D-MA) . Referred to Mines and Mining Subc>_mittee of Interior Committee in House of Representatives under Rep. Jim Weaver of Oregon (Chairman) . The bill has not been referred to committee in Senate, and will go to the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee for referral to subcommittee, Chairman James McClure (R Idaho) . WILSON BILL Bill Number-S 1103 Areas Included - Same areas as Panetta-Cranston bills in California but no areas off Massachusetts. Duration of Moratorium - 1994. Bill contains an escape clause which permits the President to open areas to OCS activities in the event of a national energy emergency. Introduced by: Senator Pete Wilson Not referred to committee yet ; the bill is likely to be referred by Energy and Natural Resources Committee Chairman James McClure (R-Idaho) to either the Energy and Mineral Resources Subcommittee (Chairman John Warner (R-Va. ) or Public Lands and Reserved Water Subcommittee (Chairman Malcolm Wallop (R-Wyo. ) . SUGGESTED MODIFICATIONS TO BILLS , Lease Sale 73 tracts -- Many sensitive tracts now being consider! for lease under Lease Sale 73 are included in these bills. However, there are approximately S trach south of the Santa Maria River (N808) which are between the coast and Lease Sale 53 tracts included in the new sale but not included in these bills. These tracts should be included in this legislation as they are within view of Pismo Beach and N i pomp� Mesa, a National Natural Landmark. These tracts are also i n prime fishing areas. Escape Clause - Senator Wilson' s bill contains an escape clause which allows the President, in the event of a national energy emergency, to open up areas for lease sale. This provision should be amended to require concurrence by both houses •+f Conoress. ACTION SUGGESTED Resolutions supporting one of the above versions of the moratorium legislation should be considered. These resolutions, should urge that the legislation be amended as noted above. Copies of these resolutions should be sent to all on the enclosed distribution list. Letters urging early consideration of these bills by committee should be sent to the respective Congressional Committee chairman. Rep. Morris Udall, Chairman House Interior Committee U. S. House of Representatives Washington, D. C. 20515 Rep. James Weaver, Chairman Mines and Mining Subcommittee U. S. House of Representatives Washington, D. C. 20515 Senator James McClure, Chairman Senate Energy and Natural ReaoQces Committee U. S. Senate Washington, D. C. 20510 SUGGESTED COPY: DISTRIBUTION LIST FOR OFFSHORE OIL RESOLUTIONS AND LETTERS CONGRESSIONAL REPRESENTATIVES - Senator EPRESENTATIVESSenator Pete Wilson U. S. Senate . 452 Senate Office Building Washington, D. C. 20510 Senataor Alan Cranston U. S. Senate Senate Office Building Washington, D. C. 220510 Representataive William Thomas U. S. House of Representatives Washington, D. C. 20515 Representative Leen Panetta U. S. House of Representatives 437 Cannan Building Washington, D. C. 20515 CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES Representative Jim Weaver, Chairman Mines and Mining Subcommittee, Roam 1626 U. S. House of Represent at a i ves Washington, D. C. 20515 STATE AGENCIES Michael Fischer, Executive Director California Coastal Commission 631 Howard Street Sar, Francisco, Ca. 94105 Governor- George Deukmejian State Capitol Sacramento, Ca. 95814 Secretary of Environmental Affairs Got-don Duffy 1102 Q Street Sacramento, Ca 95815 Commissioner Steve MacElvaine California Coastal Commission 1325 Atascadero Rd. Morro Bay, Ca. L STATE LEGISLATURE State Senator Ken Maddy California State Legislature State Capitol Sacramento, Ca. '95814 Assemblyman Eric Seastrand California State Legilsture State Capitol Sacramento, Ca. 95814 State Senator Henry Mello California State Legislature State Capitol Sacarament o, Ca. 95814 LOCAL GOVERNMENT Sari Luis Obispo County and Cities Area Planning and Coordinating Council County Government Center San Luis Obispo, Ca. 93408 San Luis Obispo County Board of Supervisors Courthouse Annex San Luis Obispo, Ca. 93408 Attention: Bill Coy Ruth Brackett Jerry Diefenderfer Kurt Kupper Jeff Jorgensen Sample Resolution A RESOLUTION OF IN SUPPORT OF SENATOR WILSON' S BILL, S 1103, PLACING A MORATORIUM ON OFFSHORE OIL DRILLING IN THE OCS. z WHEREAS, the economy of San Luis Obispo County is dependent on commercial fishing, recreation, tourism and agriculture, and WHEREAS, San Luis Obispo County has clean air that will be degraded by offshore oil drilling activities, resulting in violations of the State and Federal health ambient air quality standards because of weaknesses in the current Federal Department of the Interior air quality regulations, and WHEREAS, Central California spectacular scenic coastline is also a critical habitat for diverse bird and marine life, deserving of protection and preservation including the threatened southern sea otter, and WHEREAS, Offshore oil development in Central California coastal waters at this time poses a serious threat to the coastal economy of San Luis Obispo County because of impacts from projected oil spills, degradation of air quality resources and conflicts with other uses of the offshore and coastal areas, and WHEREAS, Senator Wilson has introduced in the Congress of the United loll States a bill, S. 1103, and WHEREAS, Senator Wilson' s bill would place a moratorium on offshore drilling activity on the Outer- Contiental Shelf in Central and Northern California north of the Santa Marin River (N808) to the Oregon Border and in certain other areas of California until 1994, and WHEREAS, this legislation does not include nine sensitive tracts south f N808 between the coal t and Lease Sale 53, now being considered for lease under Sale No. 73, and WHEREAS, Senator Wilson' s bill would permit opening of these areas in the event of a national energy emergency as determined by the President, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that in the County of San Luis Obispo, State of California, hereby- adopts this resolution in general support of Senator Wilson' s bill, S 1103, and directs that copies of this resolution be forwarded to all appropriate members of Congress and other interested agencies and officials. We urge that this legislation be amended to include the nine tracts south of N808 described above and to include provision that any opening of OCS moratorium areas by the President be with concurrence of both Houses of Congress. WILAN II 98TH CONGRESS i .1ST SESSION i� To impose a moratorium on offshore oil and gas leasing, certain licensing and permitting, and approval of certainplans, with respect to geographical areas located in the Pacific Ocean off the coastline of the State of California. C IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES APRIL 20 (legislative day, APRIL 18), 1983 Mr.Vmsox introduced the following-bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 9`351 L To impose a moratorium on offshore oil and gas leasing, certain licensing and permitting, and approval of certain plans, with :respect to geographical areas;located in the Pacific Ocean j off the coastline of the State of California. f 1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa- 2 lives of.the United States of America in Congress assembled, 3 That (a) notwithstanding section 8 of the Outer Continental 4 Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1337), the Secretary of the Inte- 5 rior may not issue any oil and gas lease on any submerged 6 lands located within the geographical areas described in sec- 7 tion 4(a). u. { _r 2 x 1 (b) Notwithstanding sections 11 and 25 of the Outer 2 Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1340 and 1351), the _ z 3 Secretary of the Interior'may not grant any license or permit 4 for any activity which— 5 (1) affects the geographical areas descrihed'in sec- 6 tion 4(a), and 7 (2) involves drilling for oil or gas. 8 (c) Notwithstanding sections 11 and 25 of the Outer 9 Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1340,and 1351), the 10 Secretary of the Interior may not approve.any exploration 11 plan, or any development and production plan, which- 12 (1) provides for any activity affecting the geo- 13 graphical area described in section 4(a), and !7 14 (2) involves drilling for oil or gas. 15 SEC.. 2. This Act shall not affect the authority of the 16 Secretary of the Interior to approve any plan, or to grant any 17 license or permit, which allows scientific exploration or other 18 scientific activities. 19 SEC. 3. This Act shall take effect on the date of its 20 enactment and shall remain effective 'until January,!, 1994, 21 except that this Act shall riot apply during any period in 22 which there is in effect a national emergency, proclaimed by 23 the President, which involvesa shortage of oil or gas. 24 SEC. 4. (a) The geographical areas specified in the pre- 25 ceding sections of this Act are— . t: s j i 3 1, (1) an area of the Outer Continental Shelf, as de- fined in section 2(a), of the Outer Continental Shelf .3 Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1331(a)), located in the Pacific 4 Ocean off the .coastline of the State of California,with 5 the boundaries of— 6 (A) on the north, the line between the row of 7 blocks numbered N968 and the row of blocks 8 numbered N969 of the Universal Transverse Mer- 9 Gator Grid System based on the Clarke Spheroid 10 of 1866; and:. 11 (B) on the south, the line between the row of 12 blocks numbered. N808 and the row of blocks 13 numbered N809 of the Universal Transverse Mer- 14 Gator Grid ,System based on the Clarke Spheroid 15 , of 1866- 16 (2) an area of the ,Outer Continental Shelf, as de- 17 fined in section 2(a) of the Outer Continental Shelf 18 Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1331(a)), located in the Pacific 19 Ocean off the coastline of Santa Monica Bay, State of 20 California, which begins at the point of intersection of 21 a seaward extension of the boundary line between Los 22 Angeles County and Ventura County with the seaward I 23 limit of the California State Tidelands: thence due 24 south to the midpoint of block 39 north 52 gest; 25 thence diagonally southeast to the southeast corner of S 1103 15 9 4 1 block '35 north, 45 west; thence"due east to the first 2 point of intersection with a' line extended south from 3 Point Fermin along the eastern boundary of the State 4 of California Oil and Gas Sanctuary in' effect on June 5 1, 1982; thence north along that line to the first point 6 of intersection with' seaward boundary of the California 7 State Tidelands; thence northwesterly to the point of 8 beginning along the seaward boundary of the California ' 9 State Tidelands; 10 (3) an area of the Outer Continental Shelf, as de 11 fined in section 2(a) of the Outer Continental Shelf 12 'Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1331(a)), located in the Pacific 13 Ocean off the coastline of ' Orange and San Diego 14 Counties, State of California, which begins at the in- 15 tersection of the southern border of row 34 north with 16 the"seaward boundary Iof 'the California State Tide- 17 lands; thence duewest to the northwest corner of IS ' block 33 north, 35 west; thence due south to the 19 southwest corner of block 31-�north, 35� west; thence 20 diagonally southeast to the southwest corner, of block 21 21 north, 25 west; thence due south to the point of in- 22 tersection tivith the international boundary line between 23 the United States and `Memco; thence easterly along ; t 24 said international boundary'line to its first point of in- 25 tersection with the seaward boundary of the California a r - 5 1 State Tidelands; thence northwesterly along the sea- ; 2 ward boundary of the California State Tidelands to the 3 point of beginning; and ' i 4 (4) an area of the Outer Continental Shelf, as de- F. t 5 fined in section 2(a) of the Outer Continental Shelf s 6 Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1331(a)), located in the Pack �a 7 Ocean off the coastline of the State of California and 1 8 consisting of the following tracts identified on the offi- 9 cial Outer Continental Shelf leasing map for the Chan- 10 nel Islands Area (map numbered 6B): 11 (A) All of block 50 north, 67 west. 12 y (B) The northwestern quarter of the north- 13 western quarter of block 51 north, 65 west. i 14 (C) All of block 51 north, 66 west. ! 15 (D) All of block 51 north, 67 west: 16 (E) All of block 51 north, 68 west. 17. (F) All of block 51 north, 69 west. 18 (G) The eastern half and the eastern half of 19 the western half of block 51 north, 70 west. 20 (H) All of block 52 north, 64 west. 21 (1) All of block 52 north, 65 west. 22 (J) All of block 52 north, 66 west. f M 23 (Ui) All of block 52 north, 67 west. i 24 (L) All of block 52 north, 68 west. 25 mn All of block 52 north, 69 west. • s r s 1103 Is , 6 1 (N) The eastern half and the eastern half of 2 the western half of block 52 north, 70 west, 3 and any submerged lands within that part of the Chan- 4 nel Islands National Marine Sanctuary which lies three 5 to sig miles out from the baseline from which the State 6 waters are measured around San Miguel and Prince Is- 7 lands, Santa Rosa, Santa Cruz, Anacapa, and Santa 8 Barbara Islands. 9 (b) The northern and southern boundaries of the geo- ; 10 graphical area described in subsection (a)(1) are marked on 11 the map entitled "United States Department of the Interior, 12 Bureau of Land Management Index of Outer Continental 13 Shelf Official Protraction Diagrams Pacific Coast", dated 14 March 1982. The areas described in subsections (a) (2) and 15 (3) are those areas contained on a map entitled "United 16 States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Manage- 17 ment, Pacific Outer Continental Shelf Office, Southern Cali- 18 forma-Offshore Area". 0 S 14ue is A RESOLUTION OF IN SUPPOOOF HR 2059, A BILL PLACING A MORATORIUM ON OFFSHORE OIL DRILLING IN THE OCS. WHEREAS, the economic vitality of San Luis Obispo County is dependen on commercial fishing, recreation, tourism and agriculture, and WHEREAS, San Luis Obispo County, also possesses clean air that will be degraded by offshore oil drilling activities, resulting ing in violations of the State and Federal air quality health standards because of weaknesses in the current Federal Deparatment of the Interior- OCS air quality regulations, and WHEREAS, Central California has a spectacular scenic coastline which is also a critical habitat for diverse bard and marine life, deserving of protection and preservation including the threatened southern sea otter, and WHEREAS, Offshore oil development in Central California coastal waters poses a serious threat to the coastal economy of San Luis Obispo County because of impacts from projected oil spills, degradation of air quality resources and conflicts with other uses of the offshore and coastal areas, and WHEREAS, a bipartisan bill, HR 2059, has been introduced in the Congress of the United States, and WHEREAS, HR 5059 would place a moratorium on offshore drilling activity on the Outer Contiental Shelf in Central and Northern California north ��f the Santa Maria River (N808) to the Oregon Border and in certain ether areas of California and Massachusetts until the Year 2000, and 4101 WHEREAS, HR 2059 will allow scientific exploration�n and other scientific activities, WHEREAS, HR 2059 does not include sensitive tracts south of N808 between the coast and Lease Sale 53 tracts now being considered by the Department of the Interior for lease under Sale No. 73, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that in the County of San Luis Obispo, State of California, hereby adopts this resolution in support of HR 2059; urges that this legislation be amended to include the above described tracts south of N808 to provide a buffer between OCS development and the coast and directs that copies of this resolution be forwarded to all appropriate members of Congress and other interested agencies and officials. SAMPLE RESOLUTION i. A BILA. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled. That (a) notwithstanding section 8 of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1337). the Secretary of the Interior may not issue any oil and gas lease on any submerged lands located within the geographical areas described in section 4(a) and the additional area referred to in section 4(b). (D} Notwithstanding sections 11 and 25 of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1340 and 1351). the 3 Secretary of the Interior s►ay not grant any license or permit for any activity which-- (1) affects the geographical areas described in section 4 (a), and (2) involves drilling for oil or gas. (c) Notwithstanding sections•ll. and 25 of.ths Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1340 and 1351). the Secretary of the Interior may not approve any exploration plan. or any development and production plan. which•- (1•) provides for any activity affecting the geographical area described in section 4 (a), and (2) involves drilling for oil or gas. i SEC. 2. This Act shall not affect the authority of the Secretary of the Interior to approve any plan, or to grant any license or "permit. which allows scientific exploration orlother scientific activities. SEC. 3. This Act shall take effect on the date of the enactment and shall remain effective-- (1) until January 1. 2000 in the case of the areas referred to in section 4(a). and (2) until January 1, 1990 in the case of the additional area referred to in section 4(b). SEC.. 4. (a) The geographical areas specified in the preceding sections.wof this'.-Act are: (1) -an area-of the Outer Continental Shelf, as , defined in section 2(a) of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1331(a)). located in the Pacific Ocean off the coastline 6 f the State of California with the boundaries of.. (A) on the north. the line between the row of blocks numbered N968 and the row of blocks numbered N969 of -the Universal Transverse Mercator Grid System based on the Clarke Spheroid of 1866 and (B) on the south. .-the line between the row of blocks numbered N808 and the row of blocks numbered N809 of the Universal Transverse Mercator Grid System based on- the Clarke Spheroid of-1866; (2) Ian area of the Outer Continental Shelf, as defined in section 2(a) of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C.:.1331(a)) located in the Pacific Ocean off the coastline of, Santa Monica Bay, State of California. which begins at the point of intersection of a seaward extension of the` boundary line between Los Angeles County and Ventura County with the seaward limit Of the California State Tidelands: thence due south to the midpoint of Block 39N-52W; thence diagonally south east to the southeast corner of Block 35N-45W; thence due east to the first point of intersection with a line extended south from Pt. Fermin along the eastern boundary of the State 10f California Oil and Gas Sanctuary in effect on June 1, 1982; thence north along that line to the first point of intersection with seaward boundary of the California State Tidelands; thence northwesterly to the point of beginning along the seaward boundary of -he Californi. ce Tidelands; and r i • (3) an area of the Outer Continental Shelf, as defined in section 2(a) of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1331(a)) located in the Pacific Ocean off the coastline of Orange and San Diego Counties, State of `California, which begins at the intersection of the southern border of Row 34N with the seaward boundary of the California State Tidelands; thence due west to the northwest corner of Block 33N- 35W; thence due south to the southwest corner of Block 31N-35W; thence diagonally southeast to the southwest corner of Block 21N-25W; thence due south to the point of intersection with the International Boundary line between the United States and Mexico; thence easterly along said International Boundary line to its first Point of intersection with the seaware boundary of the California State Tidelands; thence northwesterly along the seaward boundary of the California State Tidelands to the point of beginning. ti (4) an area of the Outer Continental Shelf, as z, defined in section 2(a) of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1331(a)) , located in the Pacific Ocean off the coastline of .the State of California and consisting of the following tracts identified on the Official Outer Continental Shelf Leasing Map for the Channel Islands Area (map numbered 6B): (A) All of block 50 north, 67 west (B) The northwestern quarter of the northwestern quarter of block 51 north, 65 west (C) All of block 51 north, 66 west (0) All of block 51 north, 67 west (E) All of block 51 north, 68 west (F) All of block 51 north. 69 west (G) The eastern half and the eastern half of the western half of block 51 north, 70 west (H) all of block 52 north, 64 west (1) All of block 52 north, 65 .west (J) All of block 52 north, 66 west (K) All of block 52 north, 67 west (L) All of block 52 north, 68 west (M) All of block 52 north, 69 west (N) The eastern half and the eastern half of the western half of block 52 north, 70 west, and any submerged lands within that part of the Channel Islands National Marine Sanctuary which lies 3 to 6 miles out from the baseline from which the State waters are measured around San Miguel and Prince Islands. Santa Rosa, Santa Cruz, Anacapa, and Santa Barbara Islands; (5) an area of the Outer Continental Shelf, as defined in section 2(a) of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1,33I(a)), located in the Atlantic Ocean off thecoastline of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and'extending .from the baseline, defined as the seaward limit of :the Commonwealth of Massachusetts' territorial sea, to a line every point of which is 50 nautical miles seaward of the nearest Point of the base line: (6) an area of the Outer Continental Shelf, as defined in section 2(a) of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act 03 U.S.C. I331(a)), located in the Atlantic Ocean off the coastline of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, known as the Creat South Channel, which runs northerly from the:lhead of Hydrographer Canyon, and which has southern points at latitude 40.36':(/Long. , 68'301W and Lai. 40°36'N/Long. 69°301W, and which has northern points at Lat '41°39'N/Long. , 68'30W, and tat. 41'38'N/Long. 69°34W; (7) an area of the Outer Continental Shelf, as defined in section 2(a) of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act 43 U.S.C. 1331(a)), located in the Atlantic Ocean off the coastline of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, lying in water of 60 meters depth or -less, and within an area described by the following four corners: i r r (A) Lat. 41'39'N/Lang. 68°27*; (B) Lat.. 42.7'N/Long. 61'3-W; (C) Lat. 41'12'N/Long. 67'8'W; (D) Lat. 41'41'N/Long. 68°46'W; and (8) an area ofzthe Outer Continental Shelf, as defined in section 2(a) of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1331(a)) , located in the Atlantic Ocean off the coastline of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, lying at the head of._ oc within the submarine canyons known as Atlantis Canyon, Veatch Canyon, Hydrographer Canyon, Welker Canyon. Oceanographer Canyon, Gilbert Canyon. Lydonia Canyon, Alvin Canyon, Powell Canyon, Munson Canyon, and Corsair Canyon, and consisting of the following blocks respectively: (A) On OCS Protraction Diagram NJ 19-1; tracts. 36, 37.. 38. 11412-44. 80-82, 86-88. .124, 125. 130-132. 168. 169, 174-176. 212, :213. (B) .On OCS Protraction Diagram NJ 19-2; tracts. 17-19, 51-52, 61-63. 95-96. 105. 106, 139, 140. 149. 183, 184. (C) On OCS Protraction Diagram NK 19-10, tracts, 921, 922, 965-967. 960, 961, 1003-1005, 1009-1011. (D) On OCS Protraction Diagram NK 19-11; tracts, 521, 522, 566. 609, 610, 654-656, 697-699, 741.743. 778-781. 785-787. 813. 824-826, 829-831. 857. 858, ` -867-869. 873-875. 901; ,902, 911-913. 917, 936-938. ` 955-957, 989-991. 999. (E) On OCS Protraction Diagram NK 19-12; tracts, 281. 282. '321-326. '369.371, 413-416, 445, 446, 450. 451. 490, 491. 494; 495. 531. 534. 535. 538.-539. 574, 575, 578, 579. 560. 561. 582. 583. 605-6070 618, 619. 622. 623. 626. 627, 662, 663, 666. 667, 649-651. 671, 672, 693-695. 706, 707, 710, 711, 738. 739, 750. 751. 754, 755, 794, 795, 798, 799. (E) On OCS Protraction Diagram yK 20-7; tracts 626, 670. 671. 14. (b) The additional geographical area referr_d to in the preceding sections of this Act is: an area of the Outer Continental Shelf, as defined in section 2(a) of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1331(a)), located in the Atlantic Ocean off the coastline of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, bounded by the following line, but not including those areas described in subsection (a): from the intersection of the seaward limit of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Territorial Sea and the 7'1°u longitude line south along that longitude line to its intersection with the 200 meter 13obath. thence easterly along the 200 meter isobath' around Georges Bank. At the Cint ersection of the 200 meter 13obath line with the 68° longitude line north of any part of that portion of George4 Bank defined in subsection (a)(7).' the boundary runs south until it intersects with the 42'N latitude, line. From there,-the boundary follows the 42' N latitude to the first point of intersection with the seaward limit of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Territorial Sea, thence 'southwesterly along the seaward limit of the Territorial- Sea to the point of beginning at the intersection of the seaward limit of the Territorial Sea and the 71*W longitude line. (e) The northern and southern boundaries of the geographical area described in subsection (a)(1) are marked on the map entitled "United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management _Index of Outer Continental Shelf Official Protraction Diagrams Pacific Coast" . dated March 1982. The areas described in subsections (a)(2) and (3) are those areas contained on a map entitled "U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management. Pacific Outer Continental Shelf Office. Southern California Offshore Area. ' ' i • M E M O R A N D U M z TO: CITY MANAGER May 17, 1983 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: Cross-Connection Control Program Section 6-8.01 et seq of the Atascadero Municipal Code sets forth re- quirements for cross-connection control and inspections and makes the City Health Officer responsible for the program. These regulations are intended to prevent connections between the public water system and other sources or systems of water which might contaminate the pot- able water supply. Various types of check valves, backflow prevent- ers, vacuum breakers, etc. are required to be installed for certain types of projects to ensure that contaminated water does not reenter the water supply system. In the past the Atascadero Mutual Water Company has maintained an agreement with the Health Department to reimburse the County for oper- ation of the cross-connection inspection service in the City. The program has an annual cost of $8,000-10,000 and has been supported through their general revenues. Representatives of the Atascadero Mutual Water Company approached City Staff requesting that the City administer the installation and inspection of new cross-connection devices. It was indicated that Atascadero Mutual Water Company would continue to administer and reimburse the County for the ongoing main- tenance program. Representatives of the Health Department attended the meeting on this matter and do not object to splitting the program between the Atascadero Mutual Water Company and the City. There is an obvious logic to incorporating the installation and inspection of new cross-connection devices with the building permit system. Since the City generates no revenue from the water system, it is nec- essary to establish a user fee which will cover the City and County costs for the program. These fees are by law limited to reimbursement of actual costs. The Health Department estimates their average cost per device to be $200. They also indicate that they will keep indi- vidual records on each project and bill at the completion of each pro- ject. The City will incur costs for issuing the permit, coordinating plan checking and final inspection, and processing payment to the County. These costs should be constant on each project and are estim- ated at $25. As a result, it appears best to require a fee of $225 for each cross- connection permit. Upon billing by the County, the unused portion of the $200 would be refunded to the applicant while the remaining $25 would cover City administrative costs. A portion of the $25 would be Re: Cross-Connection Control Program refunded only if the project did not proceed. It will be necessary for the Finance Department to establish a revenue account to handle • the program. It should be noted that the Health Department has also indicated that, even though they will bill us on a project basis, City reimbursement can be on a bi-monthly or quarterly basis. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends\ as follows: 1) Authorize the Planning Department to administer the installa- tion and inspection of new cross-connection as outlined in the memorandum. 2) Adopt Resolution No. 23-83 establishing fees. 440tU4 Act,, LAWRENCE STEVENS P6RRAY L,.,,'-WARDEN Planning Director City mpTKager • Ps • 2 ts� s HEALTH AGENCY x. 850 COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO Reply to: Division of Environmental Health Department of Public Health 4191 Johnson Avenue • P.O.Box 1489 San Luis Obispo,California 93406 (805)549-5500 April 21, 1983 City of Atascadero Post Office Box 747 Atascadero, California 93423 Attention: O.D. Smith, Building Inspector Re: Cross-Connection Control Program Cost and Procedures We estimate the average cost per project to be $200.00. This includes plan check, correspondence, mileage, information services, initial site inspection, subse- quent on site inspections, final inspection and testing of devices , registering, billing and clerical charges. We propose to keep individual records on each project and bill at the completion of each project. TIM MAllACANO, R.S. , Director Division of Environmental Health MICHAEL J. DOHERTY, R.S. Supervising Environmental Health Officer TM/MJD:cs RESOLUTION NO. 23-83 L. A RESOLUTION OF THE ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL ESTABLISHING FEES FOR CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL PROGRAM. WHEREAS, the Government Code provides that fees may be collected to cover the actual costs of administering permit and inspection acti- vities; and WHEREAS, it is appropriate to enact fees and deposits which pro- vide for the user of services to pay for the cost of providing these services; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Health Departments have prepared esti- mates of the actual cost of the cross-connection control program. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Atascadero City Council does hereby establish the following deposit for cross-connection con- trol permits: CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL PERMIT $225 .00 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the unused portions of the deposit, based on a project billing of actual costs by the County Health Department, shall be returned to the permittee and that $25.00 be retained by the City for permit processing and administrative costs. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, when the actual costs of the County Health Department exceed the deposit, an additional de- posit will be required in an amount necessary to cover the actual cost of inspection and installation of cross-connection control devices for the project. On motion by Councilman and seconded by Councilman , the foregoing resolution is adopted in its entirety by the following roll call vote: Resolution No. 23-83 AYES: NOES: i ABSENT: DATE ADOPTED: ROLFE NELSON, Mayor ATTEST: BARBARA NORRI , City Clerk APPROVED AS TO 010d: ALLEN GRIMES, City Attorney APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: MU RAY L WARDEN, City Manager 2 • 10 RESOLUTION NO. 24-83 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO • DECLARING WEEDS A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND COMMENCING PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ABATEMENT OF SAID NUISANCES L The City Council of the City of Atascadero, County of San Luis Obispo, State of California , DO HEREBY RESOLVE as follows: SECTION 1. That weeds growing or potentially could grow, and rubbish, refuse and dirt upon public and private property hereinafter described, constitute or could constitute a public nuisance and are hereby de- clared to be such, for the reason that such weeds upon maturity will bear wingy or downy seeds, will attain such a large growth as to -become a fire menace when dry, will be otherwise noxious or dangerous, or will constitute or potentially could constitute dry grass, stubble, brush, litter or other flammable material thereby creating a hazard to public health. SECTION 2 . The description of the parcels of lots of private property upon which, or in front of which, said nuisances exist, according to the official Assessment Map of said City of Atascadero, are set forth in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and hereby incorporated herein by reference as though here fully set forth. SECTION 3 . The Fire Chief is hereby ordered and directed to post notices for the required removal of said noxious or dangerous weeds, or other flammable material found upon or in front of the property in the • City of Atascadero in accordance with Section 6-13. 04 of City Ordinance No. 61. SECTION 4 . The time at which the City Council shall hear and consider all objections or protests to the required removal of said noxious or dangerous weeds, or other flammable material will be at 7 : 30 p.m. , June 13 , 1983 . On motion by Councilman and seconded by Councilman the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following vote : AYES : NOES : ADOPTED: ATTEST: ROLFE NELSON, Mayor APP OVED AS TO r ALLEN GRIMES, City Attorney APPROVED S TO CO T: MURRA L. I$ARDEN, CitY Manager EXHIBIT A • STREET NAME ASSESSOR' S PARCEL # STREET NAME 'ASSESSOR' S PARCEL # i Sycamore 28-092-09 Valentina Ave. 28-172-15 Sycamore 28-092-04 Valentina Ave. 24-172-13 Sycamore 28-021-26 Valentina Ave. 24-172-29 Sycamore 28-021-02 Valentina Ave. 24-172-01 Sycamore 28-031-07 Valentina 24-181-30 Hidalgo 28-032-18 Dolores 24-172-31 Hidalgo 28-093-26 Magdalena Ave. 28-353-10 Hidalgo 28-091-05 Magdalena Ave. 28-354-06 Miramon 28-101-03 Magdalena Ave. 28-354-03 Sycamore 28-093-35 Magdalena Ave. 28-353-09 Miramon 28-093-16 Magdalena Ave. 28-214-13 Miramon 28-093-12 Magdalena Ave. 28-213-03 Miramon 28-093-38 Cabrillo Ave . 28-353-06 Miramon 28-081-05 Magnolia Ave. 28-381-25 Miramon 28-042-34 Magnolia Ave. 28-372-10 Miramon 28-042-14 Magnolia Ave. 28-372-11 Sycamore 28-131-30 Magnolia Ave. 28-381-23 Curbaril 28-242-08 Magnolia Ave. 28-372-14 Garbada Rd. 28-413-01 Magnolia Ave. 28-381-15 Dolores 28-171-07 Magnolia Ave. 28-381-17 Dolores 28-171-02 Magnolia Ave. 28-372-15 Dolores 28-171-08 Ensenada Ave. 28-371-25 Dolores 28-181-02 Ensenada Ave. 28-361-23 • Dolores 28-181-01 Ensenada Ave. 28-361-18 Gancho Ave. 28-301-32 Ensenada Ave. 28-361-10 Dulzura 28-301-31 Garbada Rd. 28-411-03 Dulzura 28-301-33 Garbada Rd. 28-411-07 Dulzura 28-311-26 Garbada Rd. 28-412-07 Dulzura 28-311-15 Aurora Rd. 28-401-21 Dulzura 28-311-18 Aurora Rd. 28-412-08 San Jacinto 28-301-13 Aurora Rd. 28-401-19 San Jacinto 28-301-12 Aragon Rd. 28-401-11 San Jacinto 28-301-22 Tampico Rd. 28-401-10 Navidad 28-292-10 Tampico Rd. 28-401-02 Navidad 28-292-13 Vernalis Rd. 28-401-09 Navidad 28-292-09 Vernalis Rd. 28-411-04 Navidad 28-292-17 Vernalis Rd. 28-411-02 Navidad 28-292-06 Sycamore 28-041-04 Gancho 28-311-27 Sycamore 28-041-01 Gancho 28-311-04 Mercedes Ave. 28-215-11 San Pedro 28-182-05 Mercedes Ave. 28-215-07 San Pedro 28-181-17 Mercedes Ave. 28-215-14 San Pedro 28-181-18 Magdalena Ave. 28-353-11 San Pedro 28-182-09 Ensenada Ave. 28-361-09 Alamo 28-181-21 Ensenada Ave. 28-361-08 Alamo 28-103-09 Ensenada Ave. 28-361-27 Alamo 28-182-24 Capistrano Ave. 28-372-02 Rosario 28-192-01 Capistrano Ave. 28-211-01 • Alamo 28-103-11 Cabrillo Ave. 28-212-03 Alamo 28-103-14 Traffic Way 28-201-01 Alamo 28-084-02 Traffic Way 28-191-08 EXHIBIT A Page Two STREET NAME ASSESSOR' S PARCEL # STREET NAME ASSESSOR' S PARCEL # i Traffic Way 28-192-15 E1 Verano 28-282-21 Traffic Way 28-192-51 El Verano 28-282-13 Traffic Way 28-192-42 E1 Verano 28-281-15 Traffic Way 28-361-02 El Verano 28-281-14 Bajada Ave . 28-331-10 Nogales Ave. 28-282-04 Rosario Ave. 28-311-37 Dolores Ave. 28-271-13 Rosario Ave. 28-311-08 Dolores Ave. 28-271-20 Rosario Ave . 28-322-01 28-291-01 Rosario Ave. 28-321-25 " 28-290-04 Rosario Ave . 28-322-22 28-261-31 Rosario Ave . 28-321-21 28-292-01 Rosario Ave. 28-321-32 28-292-14 Rosario Ave. 28-321-09 it to 28-292-04 Rosario Ave. 28-321-10 It, 28-292-05 Rosario Ave . 28-321-33 it 28-151-27 Rosario Ave . 28-321-11 11 28-152-40 Rosario Ave. 28-321-15 Viscano Ave. 28-162-13 Rosario Ave. 28-321-28 Viscano Ave. 28-162-14 Rosario Ave. 28-322-08 Viscano 28-162-15 Rosario Ave. 28-322-29 San Rafael Rd. 45-361-26 Alamo 28-192-32 San Rafael Rd. 45-361-27 40lamo 28-192-49 San Rafael Rd. 45-361-28 lamo 28-192-05 Cuesta Ct. 45-351-01 1amo 28-192-06 Cuesta Ct. 45-361-02 Alamo 28-322-21 Cuesta Ct. 45-361-04 Alamo 28-322-36 Cuesta Ct. 45-361-06 Alamo 28-322-37 El Camino Real 45-351-01 Alamo 28-192-07 E1 Camino Real 45-351-03 Alamo 28-192-44 45-351-04 Alamo 28-192-35 45-351-06 Alamo 28-192-46 45-351-07 Alamo 28-322-34 45-351-08 Alamo 28-322-30 45-351-09 Alamo 28-332-10 San Diego Way 45-351-10 Alamo 28-332-20 San Diego Way 45-351-11 Honda Ave. 28-332-19 San Diego Rd. 45-352-01 Tunitas Ave . 28-331-12 San Diego Rd. 45-352-02 Barrenda 28-332-33 San Diego Rd. 45-352-03 Barrenda 28-332-01 San Diego Rd. 45-352-05 Barrenda 28-332-31 El Camino Real 45-352-06 Rosario Ave . 28-192-20 El Camino Real 45-352-07 Arroyo Ave. 28-182-19 San Diego Rd. 45-353-05 Arroyo Ave . 28-182-18 E1 Camino Real 45-354-01 Arroyo Ave. 28-182-10 El Camino Real 45-342-12 Arroyo Ave. 28-321-22 Viejo Camino 45-332-01 Arroyo Ave. 28-182-22 Viejo Camino 45-332-02 Arroyo Ave. 28-182-02 Santa Barbara Rd. 45-332-05 rroyo Ave. 28-182-01 Santa Barbara Rd. 45-331-01 ancho Ave. 28-311-03 Santa Barbara Rd. 45-331-02 EXHIBIT A Page Three STREET NAME ASSESSOR' S PARCEL # STREET NAME ASSESSOR' S PARCEL # L. E1 Camino Real 45-331-04 Arizona Ave. 28-062-30 E1 Camino Real 45-321-01 Arizona Ave. 28-051-31 to 45-321-02 to28-051-30 , If 45-321-03 28-051-52 of 45-321-06 " 28-051-51 it 45-321-07 28-052-06 to 45-321-08 " 28-051-42 Viejo Camino 45-321-09 28-052-31 Viejo Camino 45-321-10 Seperado 28-051-36 Santa Barbara Rd. 45-371-01 Seperado 28-051-38 Atascadero 45-371-02 28-051-45 Santa Barbara Rd. 45-371-09 28-051-44 Santa Barbara Rd. 45-371-10 Estrada 28-141-01 11 45-371-11 Estrada 28-141-02 " 45-371-12 It 28-141-32 45-371-13 28-052-17 LaPaz Lane 45-381-02 28-141-33 LaPaz Lane 45-381-03 " 28-062-12 11 45-381-04 28-141-11 of 45-381-05 28-152-13 If 45-381-06 28-152-51 Santa Barbara Rd. 45-381-07 Mananita 28-152-12 45-381-08 Mananita 28-152-11 45-381-09 to28-152-05 45-381-10 28-152-04 San Diego Rd. 45-421-01 28-151-34 San Diego Rd. 45-421-02 28-151-28 Atascadero 45-421-07 Yerba 28-261-30 Atascadero 45-421-08 Yerba 28-261-34 of 45-421-09 It 28-141-20 It 45-421-10 It 28-141-21 LaPaz Lane 45-421-12 Estrada 28-151-26 San Diego Rd. 45-431-01 Arena Rd. 28-151-01 San Diego Rd. 45-431-02 Viscano Ave. 28-171-05 to 45-431-03 San Jacinto 28-152-15 If 45-431-04 San Jacinto 28-161-22 San Rafael Rd. 45-441-02 if28-152-35 San Diego Rd. 45-441-03 28-161-06 San Diego Rd. 45-441-05 28-161-07 45-441-06 28-161-14 " 45-441-30 If 28-152-53 45-441-32 of 28-161-15 45-451-30 Is 28-152-52 45-451-32 If28-071-29 Atascadero 45-451-40 1128-061-13 Seperado 28-061-42 If28-071-01 Seperado 28-061-41 Traffic Way 28-071-02 Arizona Ave. 28-062-21 Traffic Way 28-071-33 Arizona Ave . 28-061-19 Traffic Way 28-071-27 EXHIBIT A Page Four STREET NAME ASSESSOR'S PARCEL # STREET NAME ASSESSOR'S PARCEL # t Seperado 28-061-02 Castano Ave. 29-201-25 Seperado 28-061-45 Castano Ave. 29-201-18 Seperado 28-061-05 if29-201-20 Arena Rd. 28-251-33 if29-201-08 Arena Rd. 28-141-14 Palomar Ave. 29-201-02 28-141-15 Palomar Ave. 29-201-03 28-261-19 11 . 29-201-04 If 28-261-20 Castano Ave. 29-201-32 of 28-141-31 Castano Ave. 29-202-16 San Ardo Rd. 28-251-27 Cortez 29-202-04 San Ardo Rd. 28-261-09 Castano Ave. 29-152-24 if 28-251-07 Curbaril Ave. 29-152-04 to 28-261-11 Yesal 29-152-21 it 28-251-09 Yesal 29-152-19 San Anselmo Rd. 28-271-18 Yesal 29-152-18 San Anselmo Rd. 28-271-06 Castano Ave. 29-152-22 " 28-251-19 Castano Ave. 29-153-01 28-251-21 it29-153-17 28-2651-20 Cortez 29-153-19 28-251-14 Valle Ave. 29-151-06 Santa Barbara Rd. 45-391-01 Valle Ave. 29-151-12 4wanta Barbara Rd. 45-391-02 Yesal 29-151-18 iejo Camino 45-401-03 Yesal 29-151-20 Viejo Camino 45-401-04 it29-151-22 Colorado Rd. 45-441-17 if29-151-23 Colorado Rd. 45-441-18 ' Valle Ave. 29-151-21 of 45-441-23 Valle Ave. 29-151-04 it 45-441-26 Cortez 29-142-21 if 45-441-27 Pinal Ave. 29-141-03 it 45-441-28 Castano Ave. 29-141-04 45-441-29 Curbaril Ave. 29-141-10 " 45-441-31 Pinal Ave. 29-141-01 45-451-09 Curbaril Ave. 29-141-13 " 45-451-10 It 29-141-14 45-451-11 it 29-141-17 45-451-15 Pinal Ave. 29-141-20 45-451-16 if29-141-21 " 45-451-17 Curbaril Ave. 29-141-22 45-451-23 Cortez 29-132-10 45-451-24 Castano Ave. 29-132-14 45-451-25 If 29-132-17 45-451-26 Maleza Rd. 29-131-15 45-451-29 Pinal Ave. 29-131-19 Atascadero 45-451-34 Castano Ave. 29-131-28 Atascadero 45-451-35 Pinal Ave. 29-121-02 45-451-36 Pinal Ave. 29-121-03 " 45-451-40 Maleza Rd. 29-121-07 " 45-451-42 29-121-08 If 45-451-43 " 29-121-09 EXHIBIT A Page Five STREET NAME ASSESSOR' S PARCEL # L STREET NAME ASSESSOR' S PARCEL # Maleza Rd. 29-121-10 Sonora 29-171-21 of 29-121-15 it 29-171-22 29-121-17 " 29-171-01 29-121-21 29-171-02 Pinal Ave. 29-141-23 29-171-03 Cortina 29-191-32 29-171-06 Curbaril Ave. 29-191-08 29-171-17 Pinal Ave. 29-191-41 - 29-171-20 Cortina 29-191-42 29-161-04 Pinal Ave. 29-191-47 Pinal Ave. 29-161-08 29-181-05 Sonora 29-161-09 29-181-07 Pinal Ave. 29-111-01 Cortina 29-181-08 29-111-02 " 29-181-09 " 29-111-03 Sonora 29-181-20 29-111-04 Sonora 29-181-21 29-121-01 Cortina 29-181-29 Valle Ave. 29-105-27 Sonora 29-181-47 11 29-105-28 it 29-181-49 Capistrano Ave. 29-361-14 Pinal Ave. 29-181-41 11 29-106-03 If 29-191-07 Pinal Ave. 29-102-02 11 29-191-09 Pinal Ave. 29-102-03 Curbaril Ave. 29-191-19 Capistrano Ave. 29-105-13 of 29-191-48 It 29-105-14 Valle Ave . 29-382-11 It 29-105-25 " 29-382-17 Country Club Dr. 29-101-15 29-382-04 Mercedes Ave. 29-101-19 " 29-382-18 Country Club Dr. 29-101-20 29-382-19 West Mall 29-091-10 29-382-20 29-091-11 29-382-21 29-091-12 29-382-22 29-091-13 " 29-381-01 Olmeda Ave. 29-091-01 Sombrilla 29-371-07 Lewis Ave. 29-341-01 29-371-10 Traffic Way 29-341-20 29-371-13 Entrada 29-343-09 Valle Ave. 29-371-14 East Mall 29-347-20 If 29-371-18 _ " 29-347-21 So . Mall 29-361-15 it29-347-23 Extension Traffic Way 29-322-12 of 29-361-17 it29-322-19 Valle Ave. 29-351-01 Palma Ave. 29-322-01 to 29-352-01 Rosario Ave. 29-252-01 if 29-353-01 Traffic Way 29-252-07 So. Mall 29-361-14 it 29-253-08 Extension of 29-091-07 Valle Ave. 29-171-07 It29-082-10 11 29-171-08 It 29-254-08 29-171-09 it 29-062-22 29-171-10 of29-062-11 " 29-171-11 of 29-061-35 29-171-15 Honda Ave. 29-061-36 29-171-18 29-061-39 EXHIBIT A Page Six STREET NAME ASSESSOR' S PARCEL # STREET NAME ASSESSOR' S PARCEL # Honda Ave. 29-061-32 Tranquilla 29-023-11 Barrenda 29-062-01 to29-024-17 29-061-40 Rosita Ave. 29-022-26 " 29-061-41 29-024-19 Tunital Ave. 29-062-02 29-024-18 Barrenda 29-061-33 29-022-21 Cayucos Ave . 29-262-04 29-022-11 if 29-262-03 29-022-10 It 29-261-09 - " 29-022-19 if 29-261-01 29-023-10 29-261-19 29-023-09 " 29-261-17 29-012-13 29-222-13 29-012-12 29-222-34 29-012-15 " 29-221-02 Nogales Ave. 29-231-14 Hermosilla Ave . 29-021-05 1129-231-02 " 29-021-15 If 29-231-12 29-021-16 it29-231-07 " 29-221-05 to29-216-21 29-222-36 Lobos 29-231-16 29-262-34 of29-212-21 29-262-42 to29-212-20 29-262-14 to29-212-19 " 29-272-21 it29-212-06 " 29-271-16 if29-212-14 San Anselmo Rd. 29-012-03 Cayucos Ave . 29-212-11 of 29-012-02 San Anselmo Rd. 29-212-08 Lobos 29-222-27 If 29-212-24 it 29-222-26 Lobos 29-.211-09 if 29-223-05 if29-211-25 29-222-25 It29-211-33 Cayucos Ave. 29-221-13 29-211-18 it 29-221-12 29-211-20 Lobos 29-022-24 Rosita Ave. 29-211-01 29-021-14 1129-211-02 " 29-022-05 29-211-27 29-021-12 Encima 29-222-19 If 29-022-03. Lobos 29-231-15 " 29-212-06- Encima 29-222-35 it 29-212-14 if29-222-18 San Anselmo Rd. 29-261-14 Nogales Ave . 29-223-12 If 29-261-19 " 29-223-04 Cayucos Ave. 29-261-18 29-031-02 " 29-262-24 " 29-031-06 Tranquilla 29-112-25 29-031-10 to 29-110-12 29-110-21 " 29-112-26 29-110-11 " 29-112-07 Delores Ave. 29-110-45 29-023-12 29-110-15 EXHIBIT A Page Seven STREET NAME ASSESSOR' S PARCEL # STREET NAME ASSESSOR' S PARCEL # San Anselmo Rd. 29-110-16 Fresno Ave. 29-281-05 San Anselmo Rd. 29-110-25 it 29-281-36 Tranquilla 29-110-18 of 29-281-40 Vida Ave. 29-232-01 if 29-281-31 If 29-233-20 If29-281-30 it 29-042-05 of29-241-27 E1 Verano 29-042-04 San Jacinto 29-241-37 " 29-032-01 Nogales Ave. 29-241=25 29-032-11 Nogales Ave. 29-051-22 29-031-08 Tunital Ave. 29-253-30 " 29-031-07 1129-253-15 If 29-031-02 if29-253-07 it 29-031-10 Olmeda Ave. 29-152-22 it 29-031-06 Rosario Ave . 29-253-26 it 29-031-05 Rosario Ave. 29-292-29 of 29-032-09 Tunitas Ave. 29-253-31 of 29-032-14 Rosario Ave. 29-071-22 it 29-032-13 Rosario Ave. 29-071-16 Navidad Ave . 29-032-06 Tunitas Ave. 29-081-11 29-032-07 Rosario Ave. 29-071-35 " 29-032-10 Tunitas Ave. 29-081-02 Nogales Ave. 29-231-13 Tunitas Ave. 29-081-13 " 29-241-02 Rosario Ave. 29-071-34 " 29-233-25 Bajada Ave. 29-071-27 San Jacinto 29-233-07 Dulzura 29-051-08 " 29-233-04 It 29-051-06 Vida Ave. 29-233-24 if29-051-03 If 29-233-23 It29-051-26 San Jacinto 29-051-17 Barrenda 29-062-31 San Jacinto 29-051-29 of 29-062-25 " 29-041-12 29-062-06 29-041-23 29-062-05 29-041-24 29-062-28 29-041-24 " 29-061-23 Vida Ave . 29-032-06 29-061-13 Vida Ave. 29-032-10 29-061-29 It 29-032-14 Traffic Way 29-062-14 29-032-13 Bajada Ave. 29-062-17 29-042-02 29-082-16 29-041-08 29-081-12 29-042-03 29-081-13 Dulzura 29-051-24 Rosario Ave. 29-071-39 Dulzura 29-071-11 Tunitas Ave. 29-082-37 " 29-071-10 " 29-081-05 Nogales Ave. 29-071-30 29-082-13 29-071-23 29-08o-16 29-241-11 29-254-03 Fresno Ave . 29-291-16 Hermosilla Ave. 29-272-22 29-291-26 to29-272-03 29-241-36 go 29-272-04 29-281-23 29-272-05 XH E IBIT A Page Eight 0 STREET NAME ASSESSOR' S PARCEL # z. STREET NAME ASSESSOR' S PARCEL # Hermosilla Ave. 29-272-06 Palma Ave. 29-312-25 " 29-271-20 if29-311-22 29-281-13 if29-311-25 Olmeda Ave. 29-301-40 to29-312-32 to 29-301-06 it 29-312-31 If 29-281-20 " 29-302-40 if 29-281-19 29-302-14 of 29-281-33 " 29-302-39 of 29-281-32 " 29-302-38 " 29-281-41 29-301-17 29-281-06 29-301-13 " 29-301-31 29-301-35 " 29-301-09 29-301-36 29-301-10 29-302-37 " 29-301-11 29-302-45 El Camino Real 29-312-14 San Jacinto 29-302-46 29-312-15 Coromar Ave. 56-031-29 29-312-23 1156-031-30 29-312-11 It56-031-31 " 29-302-49 Curbaril Ave. 56-031-33 29-302-20 If56-031-35 29-302-19 Coromar Ave . 56-031-36 " 29-302-18 Curbaril Ave. 56-031-37 29-302-17 Coromar Ave. 56-031-40 " 29-302-16 56-031-41 29-302-27 Curbaril Ave. 56-031-42 29-271-01 It56-041-03 29-262-29 Coromar Ave. 56-041-06 " 29-262-45 Curbaril Ave. 56-041-07 29-262-44 Coromar Ave. 56-041-14 29-262-43 56-041-17 29-262-36 56-041-20 29-262-07 56-041-25 Cayucos Ave. 29-262-40 56-041-26 Olmeda Ave. 29-311-36 56-041-28 it 29-311-27 Curbaril Ave. 56-041-31 29-311-37 E1 Camino Real 56-051-14 29-311-23 to 56-051-21 " 29-311-06 if 56-051-29 29-311-33 56-051-23 29-292-12 56-051-30 29-292-13 56-051-33 29-321-02 56-051-42 Palma Ave. 29-322-15 56-051-43 El Camino Real 29-323-16 56-051-44 if 29-323-17 56-051-45 Palma Ave. 29-322-06 56-051-46 1 Camino Real 29-323-21 56-051-47 1 Camino Real 29-323-19 56-051-48 Palma Ave. 29-322-09 56-051-49 " 29-311-19 " 56-051-50 29-312-33 56-051-51 EXHIBIT A Page Nine • STREET NAME ASSESSOR' s PARCEL # STREET NAME ASSESSOR'S PARCEL # L E1 Camino Real 56-061-18 Coromar Ave. 56-110-28 11 56-061-22 of56-110-13 It 56-061-24 " 56-110-15 it 56-061-25 56-110-24 it 56-061-26 56-110-25 " 56-061-27 56-110-27 56-061-28 56-101-34 56-07-06 Portola Rd. 56-121-17 Montecito Ave. 56-07-10 Coromar Ave. 56-121-31 of 56-07-11 It56-121-30 San Gabriel 56-081-07 If56-121-28 " 56-081-08 if56-121-29 Montecito Ave. 56-081-13 If56-121-07 El Camino Real 56-081-15 56-121-23 San Gabriel 56-081-19 56-121-14 El Camino Real 56-081-20 56-121-05 of 56-081-24 If 56-121-27 San Gabriel 56-081-25 if56-121-26 El Camino Real 56-081-26 if56-121-02 E1 Camino Real 56-081-27 it56-121-22 Curbaril Ave. 56-091-09 of56-121-21 to 56-091-39 Portola Rd. 56-131-14 of 56-091-40 " 56-131-12 of 56-091-17 " 56-131-13 of 56-091-22 " 56-131-15 Coromar Ave. 56-091-31 If56-131-16 is 56-091-30 if56-131-09 " 56-091-26 if56-131-10 56-091-36 Santa Rosa Rd. 56-141-09 56-091-37 56-141-06 56-091-38 56-141-11 56-091-41 56-141-08 " 56-091-29 56-141-17 56-091-28 of56-141-16 of 56-091-42 to56-141-12 11 56-091-35 It56-141-14 it 56-091-15B 1156-141-15 it 56-091-15C San Gabriel 56-151-37 Atascadero Ave. 56-101-05 if56-151-38 56-101-11 it56-151-40 " 56-101-10 to56-151-39 56-101-13 To56-151-07 56-101-12 56-151-09 Montura Lane 56-101-19 56-151-35 Montura Lane 56-101-07 56-151-20 Coromar Ave. 56-101-27 Santa Rosa Rd. 56-151-20 " 56-110-30 " 56-151-21. if 56-110-31 56-151-31 of 56-110-19 " 56-151-29 if 56-110-20 56-151-32 56-110-29 56-151-30 EXHIBIT A Page Ten STREET NAME ASSESSOR'S PARCEL # _ STREET NAME ASSESSOR' S PARCEL # Santa Rosa Rd. 56-151-27 Santa Rosa Rd. 56-201-03 It 56-151-25 1156-201-02 " 56-151-26 Atascadero Ave. 56-211-45 " 56-151-28 56-211-44 56-151-33 56-211-46 San Rafael 56-162-29 56-211-15 56-162-30 56-211-03 " 56-162-31 56-211-38 " 56-162-28 56-211-41 " 56-162-26 56-211-40 " 56-162-25 56-211-39 56-162-24 San Gabriel 56-211-32 " 56-162-23 Marchant 56-221-15 56-162-20 " 56-221-14 56-162-18 56-221-20 56-162-17 56-221-23 San Gabriel 56-162-03 56-221-22 " 56-162-07 " 56-221-21 " 56-162-06 Atascadero Ave. 56-221-23 " 56-162-05 56-221-26 56-162-04 56-221-25 56-162-08 56-231-18 " 56-162-09 56-231-16 56-162-11 56-231-21 56-162-12 56-231-20 If 56-162-16 " 56-2.31-19 Marchant 56-171-09 Portola Road 56-241-09 of 56-171-29 It 56-241-07 to 56-171-27 is 56-241-10 56-171-37 " 56-241-11 56-171-40 56-241-03 56-171-41 56-241-13 Atascadero Ave. 56-181-13 56-241-16 it 56-181-15 56-241-18 it 56-181-03 56-242-02 Portola Rd. 56-181-21 56-242-03 If 56-181-22 Atascadero Ave. 56-251-14 " 56-181-10 56-251-15 " 56-181-06 56-251-16 Atascadero Ave . 56-191-31 " -56-251-08 Portola Rd. 56-191-23 " 56-251-09 56-191-20 56-251-03 56-191-28 " 56-251-17 56-191-29 56-251-18 San Gabriel 56-201-16 Santa Rosa Rod. 56-251-11 It 56-201-12 if 56-251-12 " 56-201-29 It56-251-13 " 56-201-28 If56-251-10 Atascadero Ave. 56-201-21 San Gabriel 56-261-61 If 56-201-22 " 56-261-18 ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL - AGENDA- MAY 23 , 1983 E. ATASCADERO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Nothing z F. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION 1. City Council 2. City Attorney 3. City Clerk 4. City Treasurer 5. City Manager NOTE: There will be a closed session for personnel matters. 3