HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 06/14/1982 AGENDA - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting
June 14, 1982 7: 30 p.m.
Atascadero Administration Building
Call to Order
Pledge of Allegiance
Invocation
Roll Call
Public Comment
A. CONSENT CALENDAR
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Item A, Consent Calendar , are considered
to be routine and will be enacted by one motion in the form listed
below. There will be no separate discussion of these items. If dis-
cussion is required, ;-that item will be removed from the Consent Calen-
dar and will be considered separately. Vote may be by roll call.
1. Minutes of the regular meeting of May 24, 1982 (RECOMMEND
APPROVAL)
2. Treasurer' s Report, 5-1-82 to 5-31-82 (RECOMMEND APPROVAL)
3. Departmental Review R820513:1, 7315 E1 Camino Real (Adobe
Plaza, Bob Lawrence dba "Star Station 101" , to change condi-
tions imposed by Departmental Review R810811: 1 for the game
arcade (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDA-
TION)
4. Departmental Review R820414:1, 5005 Palma, F & M Construction
(Harcourt) to allow construction of four multiple family res-
idential units (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION)
5. Tentative Parcel Map AT 820414 : 1, 5005 Palma, F & M Construc-
tion (Harcourt) to allow subdivision of four residential
units into air-space condominiums (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION)
6 . Tentative Parcel Map AT 820318:1, 6625 Santa Cruz Road,
Elwood Garlick (Dan Stewart) to allow division of an existing
5.03 acre parcel into two parcels (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION)
7. Tentative Parcel Map AT 820312: 1, 8950-9100 San Marcos Road,
Colleene Yeager (Twin Cities Engineering) , to allow resubdi-
vision of two existing lots totaling 8 . 5 acres into three
parcels (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMEN-
DATION)
AGENDA - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL - , 1 JUNE 14 8
U 9
8. Tentative Parcel Map AT 820408:1, 3763 Ardilla, Norman and
Helen Rich (Hilliard) , to allow resubdivision of 13. 5 acres 0
into three parcels (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION)
9. Tentative Parcel Map AT 820309:1, 10570 San Marcos & 9600
Laurel, Frank Atkinson (Twin Cities Engineering) to allow
division of 54 acres into four parcels (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION)
10 . Tentative Parcel Map AT 820311:1, 11605 Cenegal, John White
(Twin Cities Engineering) to allow division of 49 acres into
four parcels (RECOMMEND APPROVAL PLANNING COMMISSION RECOM-
MENDATION)
11. Tentative Parcel Map AT 820226 : 1, 14000-14700 Santa Lucia,
Tenneco Realty Development (Twin Cities Engineering) to allow
resubdivision of four existing lots totaling 57 acres into
six parcels (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOM-
MENDATION)
12. Tentative Peacel Map AT 810908:1, Palo Verde Road, Rudy Ruda
(Hilliard Surveys) to revise certain fire protection condi-
tions of a previously approved tentative parcel map (RECOM-
MEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION)
13. Acceptance of Lot Line Adjustment LA 820121:1, 8200 Casita,
Jim Carpenter/Ed Anderson (Twin Cities Engineering) (RECOM-
MEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION)
14. Acceptance of Tentative Tract Map 777, 5625-5655 Capistrano
_ Avenue, Kamm-McNamara (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMIS-
SION RECOMMENDATION)
15. Road Name Change, Puento Road, initiation by Planning Depart-
ment to change the name of Puento Road to Cenegal Road (REC-
OMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION)
16. Award of bid for weed abatement (RECOMMEND BID BE AWARDED TO
KEITH SCRIBNER AND GARY KUHN)
17. Audit Agreement with Robert M. Moss Accountancy Corporation
for fiscal year ending June 30 , 1982 (RECOMMEND APPROVAL)
18. Traffic Signal Maintenance Agreement with State Department of
Transportation (RECOMMEND APPROVAL)
19 . Acceptance of a portion of San Marcos Road for City mainten-
ance (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. 25-82)
2
0 0
AGENDA - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL - JUNE 14 , 1982
B. HEARINGS, APPEARANCES AND REPORTS
1. Hearing on weed abatement protests
2. Appeal of Planning Commission determination concerning of-
fices as a permitted use in the R-2 Zone, Ralph Deffenbaugh
Associates
C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Ordinance No. 53 correcting statutory citations in Ordinance
No. 48 (City Clerk functions) - second reading
2. Halliday appeal (continued)
3. Ordinance No. 55 amending Section Map 12-0-33 of the Official
Zoning Maps of the City of Atascadero by placing certain
property in the R-4-D Zone (Reamer) - first reading
D. NEW BUSINESS
1. Ordinance No. 56 , Health and Sanitation - first reading
2. Consideration of Resolution No. 26-82 approving the transfer
of the Community Antenna Television Franchise from Falcon
Cable Corporation to Falcon Cable TV of Northern California
E. ATASCADERO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT BUSINESS
None
F. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION
1. City Council
2. City Attorney
3. City Manager
NOTICE: The City Council will hold a closed session after the regular
meeting to discuss employee negotiations.
3
• •
•
t
•
• �
MINUTES - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting
May 24, 1982 7: 30 p.m.
Atascadero Administration Building
The meeting was called to order at 7: 30 p.m. by Mayor Wilkins
with the Pledge of Allegiance. Reverend Rollin Dexter of the United
Methodist Church gave the invocation.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Councilmen Highland, Mackey, Nelson, Stover and Mayor
Wilkins
ABSENT: None
PUBLIC COMMENT
(a) Howard Marohn thanked the City Council for their time and
effort in working to get the new City started.
A. CONSENT CALENDAR
1. Minutes of the regular meeting of May 24, 1982 (RECOMMEND
APPROVAL)
• 2. Acceptance of Tentative Tract Map 999, 5525 Capistrano,
R.P.I .-V (Walker) (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION)
Mayor Wilkins reviewed the items on the Consent Calendar .
MOTION: Councilman Nelson moved for the approval of the Consent Cal-
endar . The motion was seconded by Councilman Mackey and
unanimously carried.
B. HEARINGS, APPEARANCES AND REPORTS
1. Chamber of Commerce request for funding
Mike Lucas introduced several people who were available to answer
questions regarding the Chamber ' s request. He also introducted Bob
Brown who was to make a presentation to the Council on the Chamber ' s
behalf. Bob Brown reviewed the Chamber ' s proposal and work program.
He stated that the Chamber was requesting that the City award them
$4,000 to $6,000 to begin an economic or market study. This would
come from the City' s current, 1981-82, budget. The Chamber was then
requesting that the City consider an allocation of $16,000 for the
1982-83 budget year.
Council members discussed the matter and agreed that the work pro-
gram submitted by the Chamber was what they had been looking for .
Councilman Highland suggested that the Council award the Chamber
MINUTES - ATASCADEROCITY COUNCIL - MAY 24, 190
$5,000 from the current year ' s budget to allow the Chamber to begin
the economic study.
MOTION: Councilman Highland moved that Council fund the Chamber of
Commerce in the amount of $5,000 to be used for an economic
survey and that the funds be transferred from reserve. The
motion was seconded by Councilman Nelson and unanimously car-
ried by roll call vote.
Mr . Warden pointed out that although this allocation is approved
for this year ' s budget, it would be coming out of the City' s antici-
pated carry-over for next year and the City will, therefore, have that
much less revenue for Fiscal Year 1982/83.
2. Public hearing on Zone Change 2820309 : 1, 7400 Morro Road,
Reamer Construction, to change the zoning on the rear portion
of the property from R-1-B-2-D to R-4-D and to modify the
D (532) combining district requirements on the entire property
in order to construct an office condominium project with ap-
proximately 9600 square feet of floor area
Fred Buss, Associate Planner , reviewed this project stating that
the request was similar to that of the Kleinhammer project recently
approved by Council. The request has been approved by the Planning
Commission with conditions.
Mayor Wilkins opened the matter to public hearing. Ernie Reamer ,
applicant, stated that he was available for questions. As there were
no other comments, the hearing was closed.
MOTION: Councilman Nelson moved that Council adopt the documents in
principle and that Staff be directed to bring back the neces-
sary ordinance for Council adoption. The motion was seconded
by Councilman Mackey and unimously carried by roll call vote.
3. Hearing on Halliday appeal
Mr . Warden gave a summary of the Staff report. He noted that all
administrative remedies have not been exhausted. The main issue seems
to be a disagreement on the Halliday' s part regarding the calculations
made to determine the size of the culvert. Mr . Halliday had been re-
quested to supply Staff with the figures he used to calculate the size
of the culvert so that they could be verified; however , no figures had
been supplied.
Mr . Dave Halliday stated that they did not disagree with the cal-
calculations, but with the values used in the calculations. He said
that he and his brother , Mr . Ed Halliday, would show the Council how
they figured the size of the culvert. Council tried to determine why
the Halliday' s had not supplied the Engineering Department with the
figures for verification; the Hallidays felt that the figures would
have been ignored. Mr . McPherson, Public Works Director and City En-
gineer , stated that the only calculations seen by his Department were
ones by a soil conservationist; there have been no figures from a�
qualified engineer and no valid alternatives presented. He stated
2
MINUTES - ATASCADERO•ITY COUNCIL - MAY 24 , 198
that there were other ways of solving the problem than installing a
culvert and sandbagging and named a few.
After consideration, the Hallidays asked if they could again ap-
pear before Council if, after discussing this matter with the City
Engineer , they were not satisfied with his determination. Council
agreed.
MOTION: Councilman Highland moved that the appeal be continued to the
next Council meeting. The motion was seconded by Councilman
Nelson and unanimously carried.
4. City Attorney' s Report No. 19
Mr . Grimes reviewed his report for Council.
C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Ordinance No. 52 amending Section Map 12-0-33 of the Official
Zoning Maps of the City of Atascadero by placing certain
property in the R-4-D Zone - second reading
MOTION: Councilman Highland moved that Ordinance No. 52 be read by
title only. The motion was seconded by Councilman Nelson and
unanimously carried.
Mayor Wilkins read Ordinance No. 52 by title only.
• MOTION: Councilman Highland moved for the adoption of Ordinance No.
52 and that this constitute the second and final reading.
The motion was seconded by Councilman Stover and carried on
the following roll call vote.
AYES: Councilmen Highland, Nelson, Stover and Mayor Wilkins
NOES: Councilman Mackey
2. Consideration of 4th of July fireworks display
Mr . Warden stated that Staff had met with representatives of the
Contractor ' s Association and of the Jaycees. The Contractor ' s Asso-
ciation representative stated that they will finance the event and the
Jaycee' s stated that they will post no parking signs, provide two
dumpsters, provide six chemical toilets, provide the fireworks and
everything that goes with that project. The City is being requested
to provide the manpower for traffic and crowd control and fire safety
and for clean-up of the park facilities. It is estimated that the
City' s share of 4th of July activities will be $3, 400.
There was considerable discussion among Council members regarding
this matter with comments from Bob Sonne, Larry Clark, Charlie John-
son, Herb LaPrade, Mr . Handshey, and Howard Marohn. It was noted that
the main problem was the fact that there wasn' t enough lead time to
develop alternatives to the Jaycee ' s operation of the event.
3
ATASCADE
MINUTES - RPCITY COUNCIL - MAY 24 , 190,
MOTION: Councilman Nelson moved that the City approve providing all
necessary manpower for traffic control, crowd control and .
fire safety. The motion was seconded by Councilman Mackey
and carried on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmen Mackey, Nelson and Stover
NOES : Councilman Highland and Mayor Wilkins
D. NEW BUSINESS
1. Consideration of Five Year Capital Improvement Plan - 1982
through 1987
Mr . Warden briefly reviewed the CIP noting that it is a planning
guide and can be changed by Council at any time. It is updated each
year . Council approval at this point provides Staff guidance for
preparation of the 1982-83 budget.
MOTION: Councilman Nelson moved for approval of the final Capital
Improvement Plan. The motion was seconded by Councilman
Stover and carried with Councilman Mackey voting no.
Councilman Mackey stated that she was not in favor of the plans
to place the Police Department facilities in the Administration Build-
ing.
2. Consideration of Resolution No. 22-82 authorizing execution •
of a grant contract with the California Arts Council
Mr . Warden reviewed the request which does not include allocation
of any funds.
MOTION: Councilman Highland moved that Resolution No. 22-82 be read
by title only. The motion was seconded by Councilman Nelson
and unanimously carried.
Mayor Wilkins read Resolution No. 22-82 by title only.
MOTION: Councilman Nelson moved for the approval of Resolution No.
22-82 providing no funds were being committed from the City
of Atascadero. The motion was seconded by Councilman Mackey
and unanimously carried.
3. Annual ratification of the Joint Powers Agreement creating
the San Lus Obispo County Area Council of Governments and the
Regional Transporation Planning Agency Annual Work Program
for Fiscal Year 1982-83
Mr . Warden reviewed this matter stating that Council was requested
to ratify the annual agreement with the Council of Governments. He
stated that there were still some problems they were trying to iron
out with regard to getting the agenda to all County City Councils be-
fore a Council of Governments meeting. Another problem was in the •
changing of the COG name to San Luis Obispo Cities and Counties Area
i
4
MINUTES - ATASCADERO•CITY COUNCIL - MAY 24 , 198
Planning and Coordinating Council, which is the original name of this
• agency.
MOTION: Councilman Stover moved that Council approve the annual rati-
fication of the JPA establishing the Area Planning Council
conditioned on changing the name back to County and Cities
Area Planning and Coordinating Council and conditioned upon
time schedules being developed sufficient to allow Council to
review agenda prior to the Area Council meeting. The motion
was seconded by Councilman Highland and unanimously carried.
4. Resolution No. 23-82 withdrawing from membership in the Cen-
tral Coast Regional Criminal Justice Planning Board
Mr. Warden noted that the dates in the proposed resolution needed
to be changed in the October 8 date from 1982 to 1979 .
MOTION: Councilman Highland moved that Resolution No. 23-82 be read
by title only. The motion was seconded by Councilman Mackey
and unanimously carried.
Mayor Wilkins red d Resolution No. 23-82 by title only.
MOTION: Councilman Highland moved for the adoption of Resolution No.
23-82. The motion was seconded by Councilman Stover and
unanimously carried.
• 5. Consideration of request of League of Women Voters fro sup-
port of AB2947, a proposal for an oil severance tax
Mr. Warden reviewed this item. Councilman Highland stated that he
is not in favor of the resolution because it does not say that the
taxes derived will be going to local government.
MOTION: Councilman Nelson moved that Resolution No. 24-82 be read by
title only. The motion was seconded by Councilman Mackey and
unanimously carried.
Mayor Wilkins read Resolution No. 24-82 by title only.
MOTION: Councilman Nelson moved for the adoption of Resolution No.
24-82 with the additional provision stating that the Council
wants the monies distributed to local government. The motion
was seconded by Councilman Mackey and failed on the following
vote:
AYES: Councilmen Mackey and Nelson
NOES: Councilman Highland, Stover and Mayor Wilkins
•
5
MINUTES - ATASCADERIOCITY COUNCIL - MAY 24 19
6. Ordinance No. 53 correcting statutory citations in Ordinance
No. 48 (City Clerk functions) - first reading •
MOTION: Councilman Stover moved that Ordinance No. 53 be read by
title only. The motion was seconded by Councilman Nelson and
unanimously carried.
Mayor Wilkins read Ordinance No. 53 by title only.
MOTION: Councilman Highland moved that this constitute the first
reading of Ordinance No. 53 . The motion was seconded by
Councilman Nelson and unanimously carried.
E. ATASCADERO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT BUSINESS
1. Consideration of Ordinance No. 54 , an ordinance amending cer-
tain sections of the Atascadero County Sanitation District
Ordinance Code, declaring an urgency, and providing that the
ordinance shall take effect immediately (Ordinance provides
for an increase in sewage service rates)
MOTION: Councilman Highland moved that Council recess and convene as
the Atascadero County Sanitation District Board of Directors
The motion was seconded by Councilman Mackey and unanimously
carried.
The Board of Directors convened with all members preent. •
Mr . Warden reviewed the proposed ordinance and the recent develop-
ments with regard to the FmHA grant. Comments were heard from Doug
Lewis, Howard Marohn, Jack Wilham and Gil Howe.
MOTION: Director Highland moved that Ordinance No. 54 be read by
title only. The motion was seconded by Director Stover and
unanimously carried.
President Wilkins read Ordinance No. 54 by title only.
MOTION: Director Highland moved for the adoption of Ordinance No. 54.
The motion was seconded by Director Nelson and unanimously
carried by roll call vote.
MOTION: Director Highland moved that the Board adjourn and reconvene
as City Council. The motion was seconded by Director Nelson
and unanimously carried.
Council reconvened with all members present.
F. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION
•
6
MINUTES - ATASCADERO•CITY COUNCIL - MAY 24, 198
1. City Council
• Council members had nothing.
2. City Attorney
Mr . Grimes had nothing
3. City Manager
(a) Mr . Warden advised that several of the Parks and Recrea-
tion Advisory Board terms expired as of June 30, 1982.
He asked Council how they wished to proceed. Council decided that the
positions should be advertised and Council would conduct interviews on
June 28 before their regular meeting.
(b) Mr . Warden asked Council when they would like to reserve
a date for their annual budget study session. Council
set Saturday, June 12 , 1982, beginning at 9: 00 a.m.
(c) Mr . Warden reminded Council of the Legislative Confer-
ence to be held by the League of California Cities on
June 14 and 15.
(d) Mr . Warden requested an closed session to discuss em-
ployee negotiations. He did not anticipate that there
would be any announcements at the conclusion of the closed session.
The meeting adjourned at 10: 33 p.m. to closed session and returned
to regular session at 10 : 55 p.m. at which time Council adjourned.
Recorded by:
MURRAY L. WARDEN, City Clerk
By: Ardith Davis
Deputy City Clerk
7
CITY OF ATASCADERO
TREASURER' S REPORT
May 1, 1982 to May 31, 1982
BALANCE AS OF APRIL 30, 1982 $ 69,443. 82
RECEIVED 216,618.17
TOTAL $ 286,061.99
HAND CHECK REGISTER DATED 05/31/82 53,779 .89
CHECK REGISTER DATED 05/10/82 47 ,459 .96
CHECK REGISTER DATED 05/19/82 . 33,009.16
CHECK REGISTER DATED 05/27/82 72,479 .24
EXPENSE LISTING 74,719.24
TOTAL $ 281,447 .49
BALANCE AS OF MAY 31, 1982 4 ,614 . 50
PETTY CASH 36 .41
LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND 155,000 .00
TIME DEPOSIT, MID-STATE BANK
13. 10% Interest, Matures 6/1/82 100 ,000 .00
TIME DEPOSIT, SECURITY PACIFIC NATIONAL BANK
15.0% Interest, Matures 6/16/82 100 ,000 .00
TIME DEPOSIT, FIDELITY SAVINGS
15.75% Interest, Matures 6/16/82 100 ,000 .00
TIME DEPOSIT, SANTA BARBARA SAVINGS
14 .0% Interest, Matures 7/12/82 100 ,000 .00
TIME DEPOSIT, BANK OF AMERICA
14 .75% Interest, Matures 7/16/82 100 ,000 .00
TIME DEPOSIT, MID-STATE BANK
14 .75% Interest, Matures 7/19/82 100 ,000 .00
TIME DEPOSIT, SECURITY PACIFIC BANK
14.00% Interest, Matures 8/9/82 100 ,000 . 00
TIME DEPOSIT, SECURITY PACIFIC BANK
13.75% Interest, Matures 8/9/82 100 ,000 .00
TIME DEPOSIT, MID-STATE BANK
14 .00% Interest, Matures 8/23/82 100 ,000 .00
TIME DEPOSIT, CENTURY FEDERAL SAVINGS
18 . 25% Interest, Matures 11/18/82 100 , 000 .00
• TOTAL $1,159 ,650 .91
RECEIVED LISTING
May 1, 1982 to May 31, 1982
TAXES
Sales & Use $ 75,000 .00
Property Transfer Tax 2,565. 33
Motor Vehicle "In Lieu" 24 ,649. 77
Cigarette Tax 4 ,662. 59
Prior Year Secured/Unsecured Tax - 1,087 .03
Occupancy Tax 2,987 .40
Current Secured/Unsecured Tax 10 ,292. 58
Miscellaneous Taxes 7,451. 52
LICENSES/PERMITS/FEES 13 ,446.40
GAS TAX 9,155.49
TRAFFIC SAFETY 3,917.06
RECREATION 8,110 .40
FROM L.A. I .F. AND TIME DEPOSIT 40 ,000 .00
INVESTMENTS 3,279.86
TRANSPORTATION 1,626 . 57
REVENUE SHARING -0-
MISCELLANEOUS 8, 386.17
TOTAL 216,618.17
-2-
O C J O C O O C O O O OBJ O O O O O O C O O O o C C J O O O o a J J
1 V 3
0 0 0 0 c !
�0 v7 V V 07 G G G S - G O co V V V V V V V V V V 0• T n x
WW .+o I SCJ V 01CrA WN'-' i o�pyV a, 0-1 W t,. w
11--••�� 1 i
O J G J G J J '�G•� J O G I i�J'�C J J O•, G J r G G G G G J i G G"� i ^ C
1
0 -0 0 l z z -
0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 c o 0 0 o o c o 0 c 0^ 0 0 o a a a 1 3
WAA"J �lV AOo wa0� Nw A`0 a, V , Liv: \rJ A�:V OoG
b T 'J Ln a V W V A .+7• D` G a'C. ;n ! o 0 Ln "^ �0:,V r.� ? W Ln--q I A
U_n ;)` i 3111 '�Lnw Wr•+ rJ W W _n P 'J ALn V I 0`A -,lT T -�o^J
b-oC3 !
-0:c D DDS ^.DDDZZ
;T71> DCD ??G �
:'•7z'-+� -uDD � :.°7
TI
z ! -C T 70 G,
i+l .o A - Z Z •w D ^ -ti ='" 7•Tt D 7 ;tr 1
h0 GD � C-):T, -I �000?IS 1 '. 7 �-+ S� -•. I 7z�- DD --IGz_ Gi'ri� ^�C ! •'. i
D'^ :n^•i D .7 7 ?l T;C7 ti 'z+ I D
i
m z'"1 Z - ! T A Com ';) M 71 G?7 "11 r D ,. -'1 7 7- - - I S �S ?I S'-i G --n G ^��-1 I � DTI t7 .:� 7.- ..- �. 2 G T
- 71 A G G 11.1 I M !
I '.OG�^ I zS b D :7 :'7z U) 'XI +7 1 - 71W zzvD :A;o I
T D I TI T "ri v!--'--1 D 7 r -a -n 1 -ri- u> D '-a?� _, r- 'J I it 1
-a S Ti z '-1 C in .TIC .0 7-, G S S 1 S
DZ C'7 DDG r) -Iz : D-ri Glx 7 --Izz
T .i7 331C :7M zL, z
.� ?�M 7) L•'1 -i •� I Z Z'-1.7 `• Ti rri
1 -o 'o C D ^=, -i - 3 70 -0 I ?I !
',CJD '172 :SCD , x I D �D;:o '-1 z .."
^-i z ti -1 ti z ^ ,i- 1
.) -Z -i I :n
i t - m -
-� z D z
iZ
oo oho I x00000000 ! 000 o 'co : 0000000000c _o 'o 127 z
Io o x o 1 0 0 0 0l0 0 0 0 0 ( o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o I S r
--Q L-1 Ln: Ln Ln . : L 'n_n _9_n r C, 1 73
i 711).1 s.- -+>.. .� .�.�._+ �+ -+ -+00 -' 00 00 000 000 ac _ =ao i 7_` .Z G.
AA 0� •S7O •G'G9 GOV wOaV V V0` n UlA
Gx G G ^7 G I G y ^J I E
.J.JJ'J 'J;J'J "J "J :J I' 'J 'J r1 'J I W '�:ri J u J 'u J J 7171 J•l) f �•-1
J 1 �!
I 0 0 0 0 0 a o 0 J 0•o a x
'0 0 0 0 0 o a o•a _ _ 0 31 0 0 0 i0 x 0 0 0 i •o 0 0 0 0 7171.. 0 0 0 - o.- .J i M 'i 1
I c_-
CD
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 :0 0 0 0 0
_.- ,,71 -,`7171 7171 - .... .r� .... ...... � r.. V Lr - _ -- _. -- i C d ^.
it I I I I :I I I I I II I I ''1 1 it 1 1 1 1 1 'I I I I I II i l l l l l l l l l iI i t D
o a 0 0 0'0 o a 0 0 0'0 0 0 b o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i0 0 x 0 0
If I t I I I I I I I I ! ! Ii. ! 1
^Jo W0 :7171! 0 `1 = o x'00000 Ao :,1 r1) o0 ot;X00 ^J''4 ^'W -J -J.> oao000 000 I O
goon 'n n ' o0a000000 'n o'n00a000'n `O:Ii _na_rC 000 Oo oo 00o ISD 7�
- I I I •I I 'I I I I I I :I 1 1 I ! �I ( I I I I 'I I 1 1 I if I I I I 1^ I I I �! I i i J ! i I :7 O
0 a a o o a o 0 a o a 0 '0 a o 0 0 o a 0 o a b o a 0 0 0 0 a a 0 0 0 0 a= 0 0 0 o o i
?CD
C� to
i0000 0:0 .00000000.00 ao0o o as oo � I '•".7 \
o 0 _,o o a� 0 a a o o .�� .� ..r - -o o� _ .0 0 I Z •'
I if i I .I f 1 if I I I I II 1 .1 ! J I I I f i ! 11 -i \ ,
J'J J 'J 'J'J -� - r-' -+ it rJ'J J J 'J'J''' 'J"J 'J 'J fj J!)
*n o I 0 a a W
AAooTJ
-1031x '1 . N "J Vo •0 oa0000aoGA.Av ri J I �1 j
1 Iaoao 0,0a00o 000000 b00a0000 x00 }o0c000 :'000000 000 1 o j t.
"'i
00 00 Dao 000 c0a 0 .. 0 00 00 -310 I \
I t
x c x- x.x x x - - - --C :x x x x C C< C x x x x x x x x X
• I I I I I I I I I t I �I 1 ! `1 ! i t I ! i � I 1 i ! ! f 1 1 i 1 I 1 ^ ! ,i ! 1 1 N 1
1 -
^�
V
• V =7T:,1 .A:O^ A J r - _r; n n=ro V.JV GV ^` .J.
- - - - -J -- 0 W o - -
-C,-• J ? i _G ""
I_na1.,1 A -. 'JTo 0_r - 0_r '00:ao0oao000'^ 'J V._1 V o - -`J _ 00 _ - 000 I
�00a.n _n0-JA .0 a- 0.00 000 000aoaoo =D o0oo000V 4Ao o � 0 = 000 i -• 1
1 x x x x x x x.X x x x x x x xx x x x x x- x x x x x x x x x x x x x I , S
i
I
10 7J W 0 rJ cn A I O
j v v -ol v — was I i
r,til D I z
t I I D D D D n D_ I D
i i 'rl i "rl -n T > J Q D
! .-a -4
i z z
z
I z z Zz^ I JC
1 T ! I
.Ti S 1 A
I -•I -i -! i -i - -i � I
f I I I i I 7
i i i i j
-n I S
I I i �1 I C7 •
0 0 0 ooa 1 ZG7
C77 -a
0 i 0 0 0 0 0 0 b
v _ Jro I >cn x o
r ri - A 'n C
I 1 IJ J J 'J.J'J I ti
I o I o ! L7
i i 0 0
j I ! Wc0 'J :,1 •� 0 ;.i0 A ',d Jt^•c 'JN 'J I � 1
!I 1 I Ln 'r_q •n rq 0 'r i U s. _ I 0 0 '�0 'r I _ D � 7
i i 1 I I I f 1 I I
y 0 0 0 0 0 � 0 0 0 0 0 0 c l "' '� \ •
0 0 c 0 0 0 0 0 c 0 i < o
1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c 0 i z {
! !
I N V ro 'J J J J 7 'J 'J J J
0
L '
I
j TI 'I Ml 1 -i
x xxX xxx Xxxxx xxxxx- xxxl -
`n rJ ,
i a
I j j j v W W ca
V Va, Ow Jio W .JW V .J � _ Avo_ A -W _J i - _Ji • l
i i i
I
i I 1 I j I 1 1 � Jl
i
I
fI I 1 1
t z
T = 1
i
I �
I y
f
cn x
ro
i I i E
1 t i I
I
I TI !
I a i L't
1 u
IJ
j
x i
i ! i x
I
i ,
i
^ a w G S v \ \ V 1 7) _
pp P b � .p P b 'T p v'I b - c - o I �� - ...•
-
II
i+- L: D D D D t
77
_
_
z '•i z --1 ,+7 'l I v"1. �' _rt D D D I �.
C x X '--t to z `G -i - - -" I D
z I j
I -n
In -7i +f L^.
+� 20 S(] SG S Ski SG SO 2CD SC Su _ SCJO
I z-*1 *_+
CD b
O X .7 C 7z X C X C f - n P O X 7 I 3 ,"i.
i
to to Y i J "J tJ rJ O
W -•i a -i S --00 -i ^.J' -4 V -1-0 -1 -+.-C V 00 .-0 -'' 1 :�, z -
V
D D D D D D D D Y D D = D D D I S
I o o b o D
o C G 1✓ P b p P O P c C o o O
1 sJ A ro tJ to A a to :.i 'J -j ., A I '•'^ -i i
W b 'R GI 'n P _UCD
b b
0 0 C C C b
J tJ
to to 'J tJ
Lt. L7
o P � O W O b O b o O = -- Cts = I '-7 . •
i< x xK x x x x x yt x X x < v x x x x i
' o Iib o o IO '� I ! I i i
o v o •� o o f
j o b c o a o o v
ti� Lll :A � x :U � c F-� � Ct. Z £ D '-• 3 I -
,
7jD I Z
j
10 I as r ,.,, cK "~-V I ,
-C,W =:L l o P t: .: �t]zml
n Ll _ .N W - .._ .I A _: •G o c t .
IQ
\ ^ \ o ^
I A i! i 'J r o `� C ✓J �` LA A W J -` i p -
2 S ' C G1 'rl iT'I 'A iTl iTl 79 ?;
M r 'z> _ i o � 1
T n o c I f 1
n -D I n , C7 v C7 �•. C7'D f; 7 t� t 7-., C� b c (-; v i C'7 I I C') '
-" SOI 2G 27 .7 SG yC 2C 2 2[-+ 2G T SG _-G TC ': S I f Ti I
' T' I ' M 1 I I .1 r i
^70 , moo ' oo o ^•o b .^ o ;'7c o '70 ^70 0 70 ; I Cf'-I I
T o : 7C .� oc JCo �c o 7CP f c T.c JCO 7C^ r. 7Cb o1
7
^J .. � N,'J i J 'J 'J ^ ° "' fJ 'J t'' " "J� 'J � i 0." ^
'J .1 `Q -J J i. J ."� J C J "' M w J L \ J V C V A 1 ^
D_ D_ � P_ D" _ D_ •V D � D_
11 1 I I
It
it �.I i t 1 1 It
0 0 0 0 cW c c 0 0 0 0 0 0 i ;*1 C t
I i I I I I I If -I II '1 I :I It i it Y 1 1 I I j J -1 to
-•� or W �. P Lr V � r A o > A i T -; -ti �
I 1 ! 1 ;I I I ,I I• :I I i ;I ' I ! I I � Z
b ^J b b O P O O I C -'
r J N I J ('iJ 141+
'J '! .r nJ .� nJ c
I "O! V I _i�i ,� ^_ >✓ c Lr � t: o r c \I o ' 0 i �' 'l \ � !
o _ p coo•. 0 1 I _ ?t !
I
G-1
X I X X X X X }< X r- X X c X X X
iI I I I I I it fi •I i i II I ! I i I 11
N LI
I
� J.
x D C C✓ I'DC -i CD.' V (� \ z I Z
� r
I I r y
I !
v N 1
L"
CO A oc _ 0c .71.l ,M oo _ I
-7-
t t ( If f t f f f If If f f t f ! If f { C
7
Iz
- \. ^ 71
x V z
-
I
j x i z I j n
D I I I
i G :7 I 3 j 13 i
ZI I 7
cc c c c l m
-i V =1 �O �^v -� V -1 17 I -4 i7 m V V V ^ Q Z
' b O O P O P b 'P .^ ' � O � 0 7 � o o O P = C "� O '- O O O _ O 1 •.• D
! L�
o c -
= - _ ^.
O P O P C O 1 O O P O O C P O _ ^. O _ C J P ! G _
it I I I 1 I 'I "1
J i J ^ J J tJ 'J
0000W c+Po o : r, Pi o-noPC,
p _ -c000P o - -. P cPCC oPc - oPoco - t roD
oo Pb � ocP o of
m1 ;-�T•-. T -^ ! T 'rl fTt _ T .^!Il , 71 7 r
XX XXXXX X X XX X ! XXXXX %� xx,,xxXXXXhrx, X X:� X X -+
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i I I i I i I i I O1
bcoco = O I O o � PPCo Oocc �-cam _ - '- PP - !
O O = 0 0I-
N ^J 'JND rJ`J 'J -1 I -o ! � - xr, � z �.^. z7z 77 z 7z:
Z Z ^ Z I AA AA A A ,AJ AJ > Ai+: Z' c -C
: V13 \;ti \', i G
LO IP Z
-1 r -
f-i X J-!-4-+ - -+ �r
Ll m moo .+ X 1
-. T' D -C � ..�✓ -< -i -c -C _ - _
1
I .. 414
t4 t4 G W�J N - i D
J \ V .. v v oA - > 1 > - > \ V V C^ L > III
L,4 .+ :,+ �:'i W J V V 'J C." N '1 _ .r• V Ti V W V - U M 1 --� f
-8.
c( • �t t t �t ! t t t t t f C C C C C C ( �
j I
I z �
i iA iJ W 'J! /W W
, I I
; j I
I '
!
4 j S I £ I
'TI x C' ;-� j -n z ^mss x z
a ? o I x T
I ;
0 -0'9 'O; f-1 Ti C7 J 70 C7'o n 'D C7:O n;'G m '9 n ' 'C i7 I -C (7 v ^. -0 i ;; I ;a C7 !
= oo a . Tc scc sa xt� so s x ^ s : c = c mi c ' s i ' m
T: I I I - I - - 1 •I - I% _ 'I 'I II I
^ oc o o :-700 0 X70 •-,o -...,C c •.; c i _ o ;'; c :� cm j
(J iJ I ^
D� 1�u -1 � -i A -i --!?J -t
co ^
D D
-<� CD CD d= 0 ct3 cz, zz
I 'I 1 11 III I j i i.I I I I i i I I - I I v
c 0 0 o j o b o o c o o 0 0 0 D
ocoo 0c o b o a 0 cco0 p "1 .
jl '1 II 'II i it
j 0000l 0 co p 0 c c71 M
uc �cl � oo O b o b C Cy =� .
-j ri
Ln
-
I C O O = ^ C 7 b C C C Ln C C C - m
T m,T, -. 'TI ni T ITI i i!1 r ::' ,:, T .Ti i N Z
x x x x — x ? pc x x x x x X x x x x i
I ,I I
ocool 0! 0c c p c E-A
vTA^JI -!-! N > A > :K i I
c Lr; V i '-+ rS a A F' Of ro z
D V,i I z' ✓1 4, Cr W v t: t. Co
Q 01 D. _ �C - >< x w {
tii
F,
i
I
ea :? D
v: A L ." A L �. ",�y C• � tea: �;�i .-. A;, A A - '� '„ -- ! C
W Ll Ln fJ `O W A V V V V -
'9 A 'J V r U- 'J rJ J rJ o c ^J rJ t. .^.Ln li J J fJ
L 9_
i
V T � L+1 V
1 !
I T V V T
A i C4 �l -.0
� � � I � n I � 1 -•I c Y z i z
:)
Z3> z _ i
-r I z z
i z I to z r)
^ I z
z
� j ;•� I f � I I I
I ! I
i
C) -o nvv i 0 -^ � r) -0 n 'o nro n-c neo t, n-= ('�� �-• n ' 'V I I � -�
�r+ 0 S '"' Y G SGG T"•r: 201 S G SG SC 20 _ G SC SOOG T- - 1 iT1
I ! ^ 1 " I I I T 1 I - I T '1 i - I I =" i - f i 1 I '•' T k-+
� ;'7 {•; c 70o c cl c P �o (; o00 ( Cfrt
jc C x.C 7c 7 .T, a C 1 7c 7 7C C 7c 7c P x 7 n O x .T.
-1 'u H D -i V Vi -k A -i •O
D y = o .; T C \: O`O - - - J T J ? 3. 1
r, -� W O
z 7
V I -� _ --i -+✓" 'J o - •.: \ �- ? I 'Ti
D D ]>
D I J
7 r _
� 7 -
I 7) 7
c t o 0 0 o c l o o c CD .. o coo
I
� •� � o P � �C ! -i -iD
o I o o 0 0 c a O o c o 0 0 0 i Rl ,
1J J I "J -J-
M,
J- f"` I - Z
X X X X X X Xi c X X I X XXX X X I -+
o c I c o o o f o o C
i
-... Z D D _ t y C)
cn
LJ •0 v' TJ^ •:,^:. o '� w ^. '+• •1 a 0 -- .7 o _ V .� 'J 7'.i i '.' :' '
? C',l W .✓ o - V V LL'I Dia
Cl ? -n a U '� i
t t .p o W A J ? C.
D .,,. o G �,1 •rJ
sl > a V X
71
I
I .. -i r i z
D c: N 77
_
t-) C � - T - 1 D
II 1 x 3 T• ITI I v� � z ! �
I
_• I z !
C: ^ n v .� ! -cv-o IM
- - C 1 c m
C I T "9 1 i
-!
I C
tiI
I 1
c o c.� oc � oc o c 1 CCS ti;p
ti 'V 'J iJ 'J J :.
i 'I it i I I I ! I 1 ! ! I
x
� l I ! !
r, r _ r- '� r, '' rr - _ `? IZ
Xxxxx xxxxx X XX x x X Xx }}�+
'.i I I 1 1 ;i ! I
{ W I VVUUU V U \ V LrlA
c tiz Lr. ,J� a - r✓ j
ryzz z _ 1
z c cc`c � ccr_ z �
IM. - I� aT rr - - = " 77
- n
Tr
i
i ! iHLI I
I
! C o
'J o _✓1 . L. D I Z I
. _ . . . . . . . . 1
vJ S ooIj -+T V c UAL'I
n D D
W w I W W j W `W w w W W: W W W Ili
3= T! ?
s CA Ln =1 t7 A A A I m x 7 Ln
0 ; V Ln A I rW tJ 10 co V I
j I I I
o o 0 0 0 o j o o 0 of i 0 0 o I 3 z o f
I O7 n T 10 o o i o 0 o I
o -0 l,11 �O W W A o I CA W o N 1 70
0 0 T r' j I Ln T+ I Ln 0 j A V T 1 m A i
i 1
n n I n n ! n w j 7 w i as X+� ' D 3 D I G
I I D 1-n D D D r-i I T D 1 I -i D r l
' D z I m n zD X m I z' I
-i -1 -n 'n D m M s I m
D D ( C w ;a 0 D D I I ;a
z r I n D r -, m o
to n --i D 1 'o i ?1 ; I -{I I 70 m r I D
n D D £ I -q -0 ; w r D D 70 >~ 1 3
-1 D I D m S i uj --1 I -n
I ;o :n J) M D m -;oI - 1 '0 I z c -n I
0 -i j -0 ! z ! 1 - -I D I m z ! I j
i I z D -1 n i z ;o £ 1 I 1
N 1 i
i n 2 I -C X ;a ! i ►r -< 11 f
` Jl Di n D I z Ic')
1 I j 1
n;o -n -n
z n n1
-+ m a J) ! D
In 1 I I I I !
A c z I co I I
z I '
o
I O CD
I z
I
1 h� nv r)-Dnr) -an w c» n -o -o n"D n v o r-)-o c-)-v1 z 1 Ci
xc xc xc so m sC� xc xc = DD x0 x I oD xc =o m
FT7 I "'1 1 (T' I m I m I ?1 I iT I m l rr. I I TI I "' I I -! I .'•'{ I I Z•*i .+
no nO nc no no no no nO no o ^70 ;j Oo no ^7o i _m
7c 0 T.0 7C 0 7C 0 �c 0 7C o 7C o 7C 0 X 0 0 7c 0 7c o o �c o 7c o 1 �A -1 -i
W W rJ N N rJ W W µ °J i G'm 0
o -4 11 -i D H O -i A !-I OJ -i -1 V D -1 A -4 o z ; -C
7A oA D -0 DV 0U Do 0 D W 0o 0o D I L9A 0L DOJ I Mn -
-1 m --1`0 -i 0 -i m --i A --I V --1 ?` -i -1 c A -i T V --1 Ln -i T I m n i
D D D D D D D D D D D D D I x n
r r r r r r -
1 o rO 0 0 0 o o -0 0 0 of oOo 00000 0 0 l -i. m7
I I j 1 I 1 I I I 1 I t I I I I I 1 I I
+ 0 0 l 0 0 l 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 c o 0 0 l A D
o o o o I 0 0 0 0 c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l n .7 0
1 I 1 I I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I 1 I I I! I I n D In 7
iV rJ A V A W 'J 0 0 W W i rJ'J'J'J rJ 'J 'J rJ W .L. 10 7 -i 0
L9 0 U 0 'l 0 0 1, 0 0 0 o c 0 0 o Ln r 1 -1 r m- -i
1 1 I I I I i I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I
!I I 1 Z t(A
i o 0 0 0 t o 0 c j 0 0O 0I ooO000cO 0 o f --I -iD
i o 0 l 0 0 0 0 0 0 i oO o' 0000c000 0 0 1 D' iTt
I o 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o c o o o o o 0 0 l G n L9
0 0 l 0 0 I p 0 0 0 I 00 0, oc00000c
I 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 I I ! I I ! 1 I 1 I I I D Ln; n
N rJ 'J N
1 o N I V J I A LIi I a A A a I V V V V V V V ? o
o 0 , o o 0 0 0 0 00 0: 000 oc000 0 0 1 m \I
t I I 1 I I I I 1
0 0 0 l 0 0 0 0 Oo. 01 00000000 W o f n N ?I
0 0 a o o 0 0 ++ j 0 0. o: o0o co 000 o a l �D j
C2 i o 0 0 I r a o o I o 0 0 oco 0 0 0 0 0 o a l :;-i A I
0 a l 0 t o I '0 0 0 T j o0 0l. 00000000 .+ 0 1 �+ I I
I
i m m j m m I m -n m M M -n m; m m mT!m m m n to m 1 m z
x x x x x x x x I x X xxxxxxxx x x 1 -1
0 0 0' c o c o o c O o 0 o
-
0 0- oco 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l
I ii I 1 I . i 1
•+ S I £ com -0fJ W A S. -1'TI m m m m m z n I
i J '•�.
0 -n 7, 'J I T W I D 1 fJ WI i i i I ! ! I D rJ I Z
T i m \ :.n A ;n r A Ll O) ""•I-•' D D W m D-i z i'J 1 G
v - C7 co 'n V -i -•, i o 'n W J A CJ.J W Ll •-i I D
M W
I i I .0 W I -1 ^„J 1 A A V :;c S 1 f
I n a) v Z , n z 1 , n n w c m v- 1 r r . CA I -n I
i D m z 'I, j -1 77 1 - "J 0 ^ ?t L-) C�M D 7- -i 'm I ?
; D z c7 r` xrJo rJ fJN *'n I .
-i n 1 7 3 I -1 m -i Inc .A o o c l7 D I S
1 ni D ?7 I - 7C
m 'I D ! \; --I.� CA W W D x m m 1 x
n -< :>n -A n l 10 W� -C:a u z I \
I \ O D `C Ll o -� t
I 'J
w m o v n I
D� r 1
I I ^
! I D v
1 �M T 0• M rJ rJ 0 t7 +P
V'J -• rJ fJ !V.'J O• T b% Ln Cl 0 0W W W :,! 'J ••• -•A I C
rJ iJ co 0O o0 W W SLIT oc 00 O 'J V Aa. �O W�' ^''JA 'J �� NfJ ^'�' I Z m !
1 � 1
9 OJ 0 o YJ1 Cn Cn A o fn Ln 'J O.Cn L. W 21 V Cn o 0 o W W I !
W W 0c 00 Oo O1 W oo ao 0' Ll W W o N �V'JD V 'JL
1 _12_
Ic •_ �c r � c � e t c c c c c � c c c c t < <
I
V V V V V V V W :'dI -
V
i 1
t
to
.21 31 tA
`0 V I in O
I
i
G ;rl D (Orl yy �„i
3 X
?I a z D z Dv i o
z O Z Z -i I z
D 3 ~D Inc i D n ' q
In A D
3 I I ! z
v C7 o v C7 0 o n J n v C7 v t-) -0 'D 0 v -0 v'V i ! � n ,
1 G S G c 0 2 7 2 ,.0 2 0 S O S O 2 G S O O S O S O S c c c c l m
ro t of m I I .I m ! m :! m I _ 1 m I m I m I I , I m 1 i I I I z m ►r ;.
!'7 0 0 n 0 :"f o 0 0 0 0 I c m
i o x c 0o x O x 7 xb xc xo x o o c 7C0 7Co x o7a I S m -n -i
'.' J 'J N �' fJ V W 'J w T1 J
co V -1 `0 -1 9 --4 A -4 q -I N -i 'M -i m m N 0 -d A --I O m m q I m z
Cn 0 ,0 ,'J- O 'J O O 0 T O r O 'J 0 V Oma+ O w r4 C.4 I ;a
N -•i 0` .n(V -1 W -1 V -i b -1 q -4 --I N --i `0 T:n
b 7 0 0 0 b b O O 7 r 0 b r p b O O O>> r^.,� ^ 0 0 0= I -n
.n •n Ln 1 c xc -r
00 000 00 000 0 0 0 000 0� � o 0 0000 I ;JID
bo 0 0p o0 ob0 p o 0 000 00 0 0 0000 i mi"7 v�
W W ! `0 `O`O A A W rJ W rJ A A iJ A A rJ W A
• N 'n � 0 00 .dA � 000 o LQ Cn Cnw -- 'rc -+ 0 0 000 --
O
1 u z ^.(n
0 0 I O "J• I O O^..� O O '�. O "� O
p 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 O U O 7 O O O _ 1 0
bo i o ob 00 000 p O o oc0 000 0 0 0000 1 c ;�
O O -
p 000
4 I 1 1 1 I I I ,
1J rJ W W rJ N'J j rJ fJ to PJ N rJ N'J 'J fJ'J V rJ 'J N N N n ;7
1 i "+ \
rJ'J r-+ fJ N o �+ rJ Ili �+ J A N rJ IJ f 1 O q
A d I A A o V V Cn A T Ln W A
10 A `0
00 I V V 0 0o j o 00 0 0 A o00 � 000 � 0 0 0 000 1 ! -ry \ C .
1 I I 'I I I I 1 I I ! I i I i I I I j �+ 0
W W 000 00 000 p o L1 bo0l 0Ln0 - 0 0 ' 0 m .
00 i o 00 00 0 000 .
O O O O b O
(A 14 000 0o i o00 0 0 000 000 0 0 000c i :� i p
C^ .'n f I ,"T7 I'T7 I I I I I I I I 0 0 0 . o r1 ; 0 ! I
t I T I I 1 1 O
m m m m m r m m m m m m m n m m m l z z
x x x x I x xX Si X x xxx . xxx x x X x x x 1 -i
I I I i 1 I I I I i I I J ! I t I I t •, I I 1 I I I I !
00 t o c0 00 0 00 0 0 0 000 000 I .- b 0000 I
O O"..� O O 0 00 O ".� O O O'n
b 0 O U O O O � O O O O O O Cl 00 O O_^. O
I i '
nn wLnm Nto a-a it. o tr` o o noo t
00 0w"J oo � �A `0 Z w W
rn
z `O CnV .�Ln 000 \ 07 mo00 I.
1
;0:C7 A A 0 CO I TI TI m W Lq a G7 :� D T .J :7
U) I A d z I N N D D D
H"1 vq c Gc D %i 000
sU) r- a rr - v :> i � Enna. t z
nc r �' uciii -�1 c - m� � v i*i mm I x
zz -icnc �+n i to c zzz c-)zF
n � n \x � ?I as w cccc I
� -A w En-o
xu;:0 D o r
V W ! N
I �+
1 z Ln
i I ,O
ri
N I
N N a i s
_ M � NN N
r� Mn ...Ln Ln N
fJ Cn ..+ 'J o V U o V 0 rJ 'n Ln V V A A J V q V W:,J c V W V I z L7
r A r+ o P OCnA .� T oN PP *JN TP V d .� q 0A A W :.a TOS J V +w va i Z m .
0o roo.- TTTiJ
o 0 0 0 0
`O Cn oA NrJ W W o0 (A Ln`O `O o 00 ... ..• ..• ^J rJ co
VA V i
1 to
—13—
1
i
W W
V V V v v v Iz ! z v
Az
T; .n A w rN
cm j
0 1 3z 7 1
I W W rJ .J 1 -J x V ,Q „ I T t r !
L"1 A W 0 10 I 0
rJ . V
W
-v =r fr ! C
! I D D: x14. M 0:
tsj J) z r 71 1 z
-n! 0 m
I I C7 i D D
I Z
i -1: C] -n i m
I m i
D! c -n m
I �' ri c r. z: n cn 1 I ;
x m to
' � !
i
! i N 1 I 1
I I i o i i
i i f j j I M
' i 1
-0 -0=o -0 -0; n v-0 -0 -v n -0 n v n -0-0 -0 -o! n-o n -D n -0 o o n v =o in 1 z n
i X C C C C C i x c c c c; 3: 0 :x 0 x c c c c! x G. x c. x O O 7 "'c O x 1 m
I! m I I I I I !T7 1 I 1 1 1 1 m I ?! I I I I m I m I T-11 ' ; I T ! ! Ti 1 z'n ►+
0 -M CD n 0 n 0 0 0 0 07, C m
�ooaoa; 7C o000:' 7Ca �c O� 70000 al T. 0 X7. 7C oaO Ica 0
rJ -J .+ 'J N N ro 1 w m O
I I--1 D7 77 CD 'A CO 1 -1 9 W m 9 --i ;A- -4 0 -i 9 M 9 M -4 9 -4 9 -4 9 V --1 I m Z PD -<
Cn D A A A: O A A Ab 0 -O: M -O O 'J''J -� ++ 7 :A 0 W v
H 0 -J 9 J D` -1 .1 A W :J -1 T -1 So --1 1 m C)
'l>
0000: 0000' 0. o!. o00 0! 0 0 0c00o0 0 CD 00 1 m
Ln
I I I I I I 1 I I I I j f I I I 1 1 I 1 II I I I I I I t N x
I 0000 0'. 0000. o- � 00 '0 0, 0 0 000 000 000 00 ! L7D
0 00001 o000� 0'. 0', 000 0 0 0 000 000 000 00 i "n 11 D
I 1 I I I i I I I 1 I I 1 ! I n D - D
UPJ iJ'J AI AAAA, W AI A-o-1 Ai W A AAAAAA W AW W
:A'1C1'11 0l w W WI 0 A r0'4 '1 W 00 000 Doc Ln'1 I -' m -�-iI
v z t7 L^
! 0 00 0 -D o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 '1 -4 D
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 0000 0:. 0000 0: 0, 000 0. 0 0 Doc o00 000 00 1 Gn �7i
i 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0=
^.� ^J• '.7 0 o O O; 'Y' ^-� 0 o C O 0 O
I 1 I I 1 I I I I II 1 I t I 1 I I 1 1 1 D '' n
N N N PJ -J PJ N 'J N! >J' N 1 W W w W i :J iJ' " ri ri rJ'J W fJ Ili N PJ 1 \ i
f "J 'J N 'J v -J rJ 'J -J 1 ro o ro N N rJ rJ rJ o -+r rJ N I o:n D
99COT A! VV V V! L� A; PJB-' W -- A w. AAAAAA
00CD 00001 0' 0; �VLn -O' 0' 000000 000 00 I m \ 7 .
0000 ,n, 0000;. o: -•1 0000 W 0 :n Ln oW t n rJ m
1 00000' 0000' 0. 0I 0000 0 O'. 000000 000 00 I �D i
j o 000 01 000 0! 0•. 0 000 0 O 0' oc. 0 000 0 00 00 ! :7 -i m'
0 0 0 0 A 0 0 0 0 1 0 .+ 0 0 0 0 1 r 0 N rJ rJ 'J'J PJ 0 0 0 W f -+
1 4
' I 1 I I I ! I
mmmmm mm?tm', ml n mmmml m m TmT -,mT Tm n mm ! �z
xxxxx xxxx, x x{ x x x x; x x xxxxxx x x x X I -i
0000 of o0 0 0, 0, 0i o00 0! 0. 0. 000 000 0 00 a0 I
00000 0000; O' OI 000 0l O O' 0C 00D 000 0o I L'1
0000a' 0000' o: 01 0000; 0 0 000000 000 00 I -j
O O O O
1I r ✓r- I !AAADA� 'TlT"11 mI AI '�nU -i! n -i! r.+.+ xAD nn lti i j
Cn Cn Cn Cn L1 wx1=4 Z4 w N 0O M ^ z ro 7113 - Aco-J W ££ Oo I z i 1
- Ll Ln o xara z D
co COCO -o C`Lq o ££ zz f
I I i I I co CO Ln 7' -D I 'v'9H n G n Ln o 0 -i--i i CD i
mT00mm comm corD :11;ur -- AA ;a;o I .,
ro mX X� '-
i W W W W C41 w O 1 D I m A
x m> -r- -V V Ln N n n t T
W A 9 fJ CDA w \ -c :L1 n m G Z T! T
I ! I f I o00 0, PJn' I n O �i X `-' \ \CL+ --i70m
01 17j n^. 'S "A:n -G ti•� H.r i •n
A V o V Wi. 9Ao o Ai D a -C z i7 mD ;a z Z I j
v D o: -:mmm' — c, -D < za J) X-> �zc >= rz n:n ! \
v _r r r I z: n -G a; m -i n`�4 T. z m n A O v --i -1 I O i
= a: M m m -fli amD z Dc ^:n -1 zz X;zl I m j
0 0 0 0 n Z z -i -; -, -;�D C n r► M (n CJI -i-4 t ;.
z z z z z -4--1--1 -i j -i-ti Z z r--i N x I
I I �
I i i y
! ! I z
i D
140 I AW N •nW A V; w N T 'V rJ AN V I O D.
9.+ r-+ .. ..... ,... •HCl i w U T A CDo T' -j-,3 'n V slw v5or-:.I = A VV DNx I n
'LqV VV V V. 4J co 1 = Too CO' AA 970 A o9C.i 'Jo -0 oCn VV or' A i Z T
9 -J N 9 0 00 9 9 9W'n^- aTN w,n �.lW o00 1 t..
000000 0 *+A oLn W W NLn. 3`1 -J W o0 00 0090LnAW 0A 99 000 1 1 i.
1 W,
-14-
• +It � � � � t t t t t t � ( ( C C C ( C
j
W W W I W vl i W W W W W W W W I 3 m T. �
'
10 -0 -O tea. Ti Ti 9 a,
a Lq to JA T W li T I 'l 7c r1 Lq
W .J
I � 1
1
i
I z c
0
I A -O OW W I W ! W m O W W -0 W 1 'S .•
o;
10 V m A W I 17 0 �O T V T Lq I M
i I i I
1 j I I
m 7 i D "' m a a i m t
: G :'7 I z I D I V £ -a x I z
i r z D n z a J f
?1 X -c m 7 I
x. vj a i .�
2' p .a = ( A v O n z m D I z
-i D m m - Z I 70 1 D
14 :n :'7 + : ti j ti m m --I
m z
A m: x C � n
?7! A m r -D I I --1 CA Cl 1 !
M z I
m n j D ty O 7l i
M ' I
m n, my m o mvvv tr n u m mom . m� 0-0-0 m-0-0 my m -0 1
xoi xo' xc xoom x x � x o 0 c xo0 x30 x x0 f In
1 m 1 m 1 m 1 .71 1 I 1 m 1 rl I -
^'700 ^10 I Cm
N o: A 0 7C o 0 0 0 7C 7 7C 0 0 7C 7 7C 0 X o 0 X o 7C o 7C o 1 X -n -i
'J J ^J TJ 'J 'J W W W U i J'J
O -1 1010 D -110 H o -4 O -1 O -1 m -i A-J -1-0 T H w -i 'J 1 M Z A -C
OLq 7 � 7Lq O-O LqV pA po 7 0 0 J -0 ^ rJ Oo.-- C)I., OLn 7 -' f ;0 -1
T -i o Lq V -1 V 14'J -i W o -i A -+-- -i N 1 m m -
D D D D D D
7-
0 0 0 0 0 0 o I 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f -n n-
'� V V '-I Lq r -. ... .+ r ... V r V ,. V I
I I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 I l i I I I 1 I I 1 1 I I 1 0 m
0. o. 0 000 0 0 00000 0' 0 00 00 0 I 'Ti7 m
I I 1 I m
'J W I W A A V A A I AAA A A A i W �!W A A 0 W I t7 --1(n -
,.n JILn W A A A : :11 L4 o t.4 1 '0 T --
I I I z tl L�
of o: 0 000 0 0 000 00 0 , 0 00 00 0 o I 1 D .
o. 0' 0 000 0 0 00000 0i o 00 00 0 o I G:'1 z :A
II I I I I I I i 1 1 I I I I I I f I I
'1J j N to N N N -j W iJ 'J W 'J V to I ;n \
0 0 0 no 1 ^ 7] ,• D 1
Lq Lq Lq" " -�I A o o V 0 I
0 0� 0 000 o 10 0 0000 .+, o 00 c0 0 o I TI \ 'y
I
0. Wi C,J Lq LqO o � 0 00000 . W o0 00 0 W i -1 -J m
0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o f 0 0 0 0 o 10 0 1 v D
cD CD
0 J to
"I o 0 0 0 0 0
I I I I I i - 1 I 1 1 ( I I 1 I I I I I ! I 1 I I O D 1
-n m m mmmm I -n m -nmmm m' m mm m -n n I �z
x X.. X. XX x X X X XX X X X; x XX XX G X
o 0 o c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o f o 0 0 0
0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
0 o l 0 0
= m m m IN c ^ c w r i m -n-1 V V
iJ 7 7 0 :") W W z Z Z P A o 7 ti ti -0 d T z l z
z aa ^ V H a-i H Lq A A I z --
-i b a a -n -0 m m-i W
3 v I A O 01-0
co C.1) W m _ m A �O 0W m' -Ov r+ £ .7 I M
-i ;:0 z JD i 77 1 T 1 i..
GGA D T :�(n LO -ice �� 00 7 I 1 1
(n L) D I 7 D D D E £ _ z m 7, -7. cry I
:n z i x -V -V'o r - -i: , w. !-� E I
m ; -n b M -i A xl ;a Cn :n r -1 i \
r 7C I m
Z � x` :"I z Z m ti
I I I 7
` i 1
i
I � I Ln
10
I
V` I X
N N T r-• rJ N IN J ! `+ -- N N -J Lm P
o o q ' co LF1 Lq W,1 W T Lq Ln 'j W V V 70 'J J J v' W Lq Lq W W I ^ ;7
W W -O `0 N 'J V,+V D 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lq V L4 W -0,t T o 0 r 1 Z m
w W CA W o0 oArJ W A A o0 0 '00000 00 0o NLgV ?'^ 0 00 SOI I ~
Ln Ln Go W 00 0 .0 LqO oo _lo 00 0 o V •'T .. 00 00 00 I j ! i
-15-
w W' w W w I �+ w W w W W W ; m -<
m' s s V v v V
co co N z
TI 7c ;� _q
Ln A W N
t
A W
W I W A W u D o T 9 1 T'
A C
rJ a 'f a W I V X i z S .
m m
�+ a I
£ I D I I Z I E -Df I Z
'1 1 . N. i 7 Z 'j m - r in I S
I .n z x; Z Z
i -
TI x m z m 7 1 3
JI I -n £ 7 D :n -1 z 17 1 in
A -4I ! I .1 m I r 7 D I I
z -G: 7 Z D j !n I I
D i I 'Tl
z o n z z ! z r x 1
Ti
o ,I 0 m 1 'M z I 1
m i im M [')-C n-0 0-0 C7-o '7 v C)-0 1 M 7
14C x c i co' 1: "m 01 x c x� xc x o xc xc =cc x0 1 m
�I I m II 1 1 1 M. I ;m 1 I m im l m I m 1 I m I m I m I I z-n .+
00 7 0=I 70 ;)01 7) 0 111= C70 C) o ;7b ^0 ^00 m I C m
,o0 X 'o 00 xO Xof x 7 Xo xo 7C C A.= Ao Xo0 ;Ko i 3M
'00 m -4 co Cn 'J -i'J -1 D -I --I m -i 7 a -i.0 1 'n z z
W :.•! D C j W C 0 Ll 7 A A 1 S M
9 CA i -i A- -i V -f V -i r �to -i c -i W -ti W -i r o -i 'Sl i T n
D 2
D D D D 1 S
t o0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0, o0o i o n o 00 0 0 00 0 l TI ci
FI i 1 I ! I I 1 I I j 1 I i
0. c'. of 00 0 10 0 '- 0 00 c 0 0 0 o f co D
00 0ca00000' 01 0, 000 o 0 000 c 0 00 0 i mf7 7
',
A W Ln o O Ll o'r'n '11' Ji L� .+'q .+ ... O _q •q
I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 I ! I I I I I 1 1 z .:+
.00 0 000 0 0 00. 0� 0 0 0 0 0 0 I o 00 0 0 00 0 1 -1
0o 000000001 0 0' 000 0 0 o00 0 0 0 � 0 I S m i
' '00 00a0000 0' o; 0 000 � 0 c 000 0 0 co o i Gl7 �Ni
b0 0 0000000 0' o 000 I o 0 o 00 0 0 00 o I - 0
!r10 fJ I I I"J I I I DT Cn\ '7
IPJ"J N PJ N 'J "J I 'J N I rJ N'J 'J -� I N N fJ N rJ N'J PJ I
(.!W fJ "J.^J '1 'J fJ.J "J 0 .+ •-+ .� T r �.., •• SJ 1 0 L7 D
Nr)rJ 'J 'J'J "J A T o: �O�O a, V V
O �0
' , :I I i I 1 •I I I I I I I I 1 I i I I I 1 I I I I I I - i i `-� i+
i l00 = o0 0 000 :,J 0.. of o00m-
i !00 000 00000 ' o0o 10 o 0 00 0 0 00 o I '�D
00 00000000'•. 0, 01 000 0 0 000 0 0 00 0 f 7-I
I 11 i I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! I I I i l
+ I I i I I I m,
i
mm mT7. M11Mmm 'I I 1 1 Cz �.
! X xxxxxxxx; xxi xxx x c xxx x x x X I -i
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0i 0: o 0 0 0 I o o I o 00 0 0 0 0 c i I
loo 0 0000000l o of 000 0 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 1 ��
NNN rU NN'J VI UIto aaT I rJ D
WW V VV " VV V V' 'r, 0 1010 v 1 aaT D 7 `0 0 I z
IrJ Lil "I C4 C 9 _'I CA Cil -+ x ro ."J rJ fJ a 'D rJ 10 CA t�o Z V o I G ,
i A �aAAAAa' -� ZD! 000 0 - j co ---
-0 Cl
-� oo •c ' z
D x! :7;i 7 I a z i fc-Vi 'r'+ a v a i I :�
- S z m �l m m m ,'*I M D S rn a D D 'll •'T7 0
w zzzzzzz £; <I ,n0) :r z m zzz ?I -; w
;D D L7 :n(n co U)co 0 ;' NN CJ CJ O 2 ^ f , r- rJ _n r I z
77 \ \\ \ \ \\ 7' rr- D Z 1 xmm A
m -q -i -1 I -1 x CE"0'i - S cn C: \ A t m
I I DDDDDDD 7' zZz -i --i U,Lo C0 L9 1 \
I N n x 4 z s m m m = z I v
mm rr-- - r - - -J! z
!m z mm-nm7 -n D'
i z I
j i z LI i
I
I t
M I w w I s
LI A W -` W A J 'J M W N co or. V V .O to V Ln _'I,+^ V V :4:.: M V o w ^ :7
W N W V "J W W V a a a VI C9 A A V A C1 10 9 17 A A A J` '�V -' 'J"J �0�G`0 -,o -.0 I z ITI
_
'oo V TV0) �-' ^' ALAN 00 C�i C� C� ACSA TT 0o A "., AN AA 00 0-- im mC I
'00 fJ Ln .4'1 W LSV V W 'oTN as C, 0000 aC9 00 17 CO1, mm i -
1 LO
' -16-
I _ I z n 9 D
'. o o I -T1 7c 7 •n
I
I j i x 1 Z 7
3z o
0 a 1 M zv
A a 1
I i I -n
i
I I _Z A 1 C
?7 ?1 i 1 ?1
I z m Iz
7 m £ I ': I
D £ 1
z I x
i
>c 1 T1 1 1 !
on 1 -
' i")
z
I ^ 7-0 f') A {�
7 x c x O x I m
x :�1 1 T 1 M I z11 ►�
70 i cm
� o x 1 s �
70
-r1 z a -C
1 O '..J' -O :� 1 M
CI1
i 7 D D D I 2 n
mo
n o 0 o I
'ti'7'n
o 0o I :7 �x
1 1 I I I 7 DT1D
� j •. I o � AA ' I tJ0 � :'7
i Z v Ul
! ( 0 0 o I m
A A I X a
fI I i I o o o 1 1 \ '
7D 70 �
I
I I I ! O O
?I m 1 ;Q z
D G x x I ti
r o 0 o
1 ;
iz i ro v i la
z n un I c
o z :.1 W I D
j i I n CD i m
I Z1
7c p a I a
D
Ln
1 I I 1 I O o
i
I v:
C I �
w la
1 + o w 1 o D
A I_-
0
0 A r un I ;Z fd
o 0 o a o o f
.. ! .. 1 7 0
W W ( W W rW W W W rW W r� tk W W 1 3_
jI .� J I E '� - ,+ - I -iii.is '7 rJl
:.j
N •+ 0 1 0 -0 V T
0
O ?J 0 1 10 •+ n O O o 0 O T 1 x+
!n Ln A OJ 'J Ln -' = !q •J
CA I T ro •.+ o i 10 : m 71 LJi A Ln
I I
i
z I -f H 'n Z 0
z -f M S o z
O z i D -O ;az
X. z S Lo Z r 71•i 71 D 1 z
I 2 ti 1 -i TI z D - m S x 7, Z I D
j ?1 D ?i
z z j z j `J) 3 x -n n z o x
LO
III i
I i 1 I
' I
� I i
v f) o h o l7 0 f7 I f7 n v ! n -0 n v n 7 C;._ 0-0 010 r;-0
SG So SG 2G SG TOOT = O mj SG . 2 G 2 G< SO SG 2G SC 1 tr
Ir I (•'1 1 m I ;I m 1 ,r, 1 - 1 rr I -, I T i T i ?t I - 1 1 z-^ I �••�
r7o C7on o (7o
7Co xo 7Co 7Co �To 7Kooi 7c o 7CO 7Co X o 7C >> 7Co Xo xo Jco I z -n -{
rJ .+ .+ I rJ r .J _ .+ .+ t rS p
f =-1 0 -•�^� '-1 T -i i �•i '^ •i V V --I 0 -1 07 '. -1 0 -i v7' -i .".^,^� -i�: -i^',, -i'^ -�9 I "rl Z � -[
0 C 0^^ Ov W 00 0!n Ln- 0 -J ow 0wo 0J i zt-:
D H 7l -i .-1 V -i o W i -I 'J -i-P ! � W -i -1 10
9 D D D 9 D I D D I D - D D D D D ' i 2(•7
D
'n :--1 -n
' i V .� I v V I ... .+ .+ .. .+ v V ^'.•' '-' +-' V V I C x;7-n
i
-
o � o I o CD o
W "J W W o o o A o W o ?W C c W W 1 C^ :,
n Ln 'n n o 'r ,n j A n 'n o ? Ln n 1 -c c -n - -1
I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I i 1 1 I C L7
D
0 o I o 0 0
0 0 0 o o o •c o o o, o o c c o I G 0
0
I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I 'n n
N N N N j N N N PJ N 'J 'J rJ .•J tJ 'J I
A A A -• o N PJ :" 'J D
M
D
o o O •o o 0 0 0 o o
1 0 0 0 o c 0 0: •c o o o i o 0 0 0 o f :7`. A
W o WW j •� o 0 0 o W
1
iTl ;r1 Z
X X X X G XX' X ' XI X G: XX X G X X 1 -i
i o
a W n W I W 7I :1 ;0! G T _ A
z z Z Z r+ M! S i z -n{
;a z A V V -y Z 3-n Z
_ z 1
D z -9 V D D C M_ Z C
...i -{ £
T! 2 I x ~ I z
j - z V; D - T Z I z
JJ G I T A z A -n --i 'l. In i r
--1 z -a .•..1 I 1
� I I
j 1
z o
I �
1 N
i i I I i I v
I I
N
O o rJ'J N N N N W ,.: N N M 'J N
0, Ln !n V rJ 'n V V 'J rJ o o *+ ^J rJ .^ _ 0 0 I 7
W 0 0 !n Ln .� LO!n rJ `G �O o 0 0 !n Ln !n Ln o Ln o o N"I =o I Z m
(A:4 AA o000 0o AaN1. D Co 00 00 CD :r, ro oc C)CD ^T I
0o Ln Ln o0 00 00 0 o o0 00 0o I
I
I
qE it
_ s
I
W rW W
`0 i V r
I t
1
I Z G
`0
p 0. 10 A: 2 r Ln r. W rn j A "J ! T O _
a. ! rJ x d V
A
- �. •� 1 D i� :'7� m x l z i '� 7 � T � -G i Z
I y�.l I •moi D 3! O f D 'j)
'r7 r D 1 x
I
Dx D z x 1
n 7; al z I z i m a ,� i z
z r n
r 17
z z
i 7c Z I
m D I r7 z IV
r,
Z 1
I f
j,
1
I
'O -10'9'0 -01 n -0 C?-'1 (7 -0 I C� I '9 C'7'O n v C. "0 n-0 0'fl C7 2' 0 -0 i x 0".
G G TGc GGG G. SC Xc G. 2G' = G 2G TG 2G SG SG T TG I - m
M I I I I I 1 - 1 i t T I m I I r! I r^ 1 .. 1 m I m I m I rr; I I
o p rl7 O0O p: ^, o 11 7p. :"1 Cm
O O 7C 0 0 0 0 0 O. 7C O iT p 7C O 7C I 7 T.O 7C O ?C J 7C O 7C 7C 7C O 1
D N -i'b 17 00 co co 'JJ -1 T -1 -i x '-4 T --1
= T 0l 0o CD ��7 0� D - -moi ^o i ;o r.
w
e
j 0000 op 0000!
�' ..+r r - .-.•. � .r: V V� V ...;....+ •n I V V -' V ! V ! C 7C :� r,' Y
r.•.� I I I I t ,I I I I I I ! I I j I I I I I : i I 1 I I I 1 L� x
0000 000000 0 0 o' 0'00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 M.
'0000 00 Oo 00�. 0. p o., 00O o ', o o p o 0 0 1 M. ` x
�I I I n
s+ o ^J W j17 �! DAA A! '.,•i W i1! 'v7 W W A I :a7 0 �0 o A ' ! "J
q 'r rn0 no _.`. A W; rn, Ln
Ln o00 0 •8 0 0 0 D n i - ,-
I 1 I II I 1 I I I 1 I I I I I i I !
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0� o; o' o00 m
0 00 00 000 01 0 o� CD o
'0000 'o0 00 O! o O of o0O p p
it I I I II I I I I I I i s IPJ I I it I I � I i I I f I 11 D '` r7•
J'J 7J N N IV N N N 'J 'J N N i rJ N'J rJ 'J 'J 'J fJ I 'J 'J i n \
rJ 'J N"J rJ V .'J fJ ^J V 1 V 'J Ln tD ^J 7J N - _n
c0 QJ CU `0 V V V V V A: A i D o rJ : J. b. A
0000 00 .000, o: o. 0; 00O
;0000 00 000 0. W WI W'. 000 Ln :.•I
X000 000000; o: 01 0. 000 ! 0 0 p o 0 o 0 1 'OD
'. b 000 o 0 000 0 o ^j 00A'
a o 00 00 0 0 0 0! :,J W W 00O A -' 0 0 0 W I •:
''I
M .T7 m �I n' T n � m
*, m m m
xxxx xxxxxx! x x xxxx x x c x c x x 1 -;
'0 000 0 0 000 0�. o• 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 o f
;0000 00 Ooop! pl 0! 000 0 0 - 0 0 0 o f L7
0
0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
l0 000 00000
G i 1 Z
7, 0. C. .�n �.-� rr YI 7 7 j W W rl D D ?'1 D • Z I
mro e xA xn �717! z' z z. o0o z z TI v z i G
W P W ti _ T; 7
cpTO0 j m "I-,o CJ m x xl x� DDD 'a Z Z z
77
o '0-0 o Ln o u,•" 0 T -i -i ti: 2 -1 - LY L-I
N S D W D -� I Z
ICnI cin I W WI o 0 0 Ln o 0! I `-+ •�`.1'-+ Z N
_ r V Z I x
i1 Z Z T m rTl T i r, .r•. ., .• I \
IzZZZ ! S x m "' x - I t
to
_ I I I Z Lq k
'J
.J .J U o q N .J 'J W Wq o o a M
Ln rLP 'J V r rr r -0 0 0 - V V r7 C4 col CD IN -j o 0 0o Cl.n Oo NN f z m
'V _n '!A Mo = DV r00 LnL^,
rT .no V t..Ln 21 V V V 00 00 00 00 00 0o i
—19—
ap
i I D
W w W w W :A ' W w 'M! :r! wtA
3 -
�: z
A W
1
I
EXPENSE LISTING
May 1, 1982 to May 31, 1982
Payroll dated 05/05/82, Checks 8373-8448 $ 37,730 .97
Payroll dated 05/19/82, Checks 8469-8523 37 , 312.88
Void Check 13338, Check Reg. dated 03/24/82, Pg. 2 ( 10 . 00)
Void Check 13753 , Check Reg. dated 05/19/82, Pg. 1 ( 250 .00)
Void Check 13828, Check Reg. dated 05/27/82, Pg. 2 ( 50 . 00)
Void Check 5713 , Check Reg. dated 07/31/81, Pg. 1 ( 14 . 61)
TOTAL $ 74,719.24
i
CITY OF ATASCADERO
TREASURER' S REPORT
May 1, 1982 to May 31, 1982
I , RALPH H. DOWELL, JR. , do hereby certify and declare
that the demands enumerated and referred to in the foregoing
register are accurate and just claims against the City and
that there are funds available for payment thereof in the
City Treasury.
Dated: June 10 , 1982
RALP H. DOWELL, JR.
Finance Director
APPROVED:
UR Y L. ARDEN
Cit Man ger
i
•
-23-
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: CITY MANAGER June 9, 1982
FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW R820513:1
LOCATION: 7315 El Camino Real (Adobe Plaza)
APPLICANT: Bob Lawrence dba: "Star Station 10111
REQUEST: To change conditions imposed by Departmental Review
R810811: 1 for the game arcade.
On June 7, 1982 the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on
the subject matter unanimously approving extended hours for the game
arcade as set forth in the attached Staff Report.
The Commission discussed the matter only briefly inquiring about any
incidents associated with the arcade.
Bob Lawrence, applicant, appeared and indicated concurrence with the
staff recommendation.
No one else appeared on the matter . -
LAWRENCE STEVEN MURRA L. ARDEN
Planning Director City ana er
/Ps
1
CITY OF ATASCADERO
Dto t 1r
19is I 1979
Planning Deparment June 7, 1982
STAFF REPORT
SUBJECT: Departmental Review R820513:1
LOCATION: 7315 E1 Camino Real (Adobe Plaza)
APPLICANT: Bob Lawrence dba: "Star Station 101"
REQUEST: To change conditions imposed by Departmental Review
R810811: 1 for the game arcade
BACKGROUND
1. Existing Zoning: , C-1-D (519)
2. General Plan: Retail Commercial
3. Environmental Determination: This application is exempt from the
requirements of C.E.Q.A.
4. Site Conditions: The site is the present location of the Adobe
Plaza Shopping Center . A parking lot exists across the entire
frontage of the Center along El Camino Real and provides parking
shared by all tenants.
5. Project Description: The applicant is renting an 18' 6"x60 ' 6"
(1120 sq.ft. ) store in which he is operating "Star Station 101" ,
an arcade with electronic games. There are approximately 20 game
machines located against the walls running the length of the
store, and a change booth and a restroom in one back corner . One
of the conditions of the original Departmental Review of the use
(D810811:1) was the following:
114. Hours of operation shall be limited to the following:
- Sunday through Thursday 10:00 a.m. - 9:00 p.m.
- Friday and Saturday 10: 00 a.m. - 11: 00 p.m. "
The applicant has requested (see attached letter) that the family
arcade be alowed to stay open until 11: 00 p.m. on nights before
school vacation days; such as Memorial Day weekend, Thanksgiving
recess, Christmas vacation, summer vacation and all semester
breaks.
STAFF COMMENTS
The primary reasons for limiting the hours of operation for the game
arcade were to minimize potenti*L noise disturbance associated with
Departmental Review R820513:1 (Lawrence)
late night activity on weekdays and to minimize potential vandalism to
other stores in the center by maintaining similar hours of operation.
Based on Staff' s observation, on the lack of complaints from residen-
tial neighbors and other tenants in the center , and on the lack of
police responses to the arcade business, it appears that these poten-
tial problems have not materialized. The request is to allow for ad-
ditional hours of operation on certain days. Due to the lack of prob-
lems, Staff sees no reason why the extension of hours should be lim-
ited to holidays. If a future problem develops , the hours can always
be reduced during the annual review or during any nuisance proceeding
initiated by the City.
FINDINGS
1. The use has had no adverse effect on abutting property or the per-
mitted use thereof since recommended conditions have been imposed.
2. The modification of operating hours for the game arcade for which
the Departmental Review is sought will not be detrimental to the
public welfare or be injurious to propety or improvements in said
neighborhood.
3. The project will not have a significant effect upon the environ-
ment.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the above findings, the Planning Department recommends ap-
proval of Departmental Review R820513: 1 subject to the following con-
ditions:
1. Compliance with Conditions 1-13 established in conjunction with
the approval of Departmental Review R810811: 1 except that Condi-
tion 4 shall be modified to read as follows:
114. Hours of operation shall be limited to 10 : 00 a.m. -
11: 00 p.m."
ACTION
The Planning Commission should by motion direct Staff as deemed appro-
priate.
TO APPROVE: Adopt findings and set conditions
TO DENY: Set findings for denial
REPORT PREPARED BY :
VINCENT KIRKHUFFi
Planning Intern
REPORT APPROVED BY:-
LAWRENCE STEVENS
Planning Director
2
---1 N P \ i
Oj
DKP
1 gra
� � ; / .� �� �
s co
Qi
la
\
- / ��, \ \• �C' May• �f?�
61 -
In C�I
Iv
' - / J ['
Lp
�� � �oL:. ' ,' o\ � vim• � �� 1� ��-
cr z
-PLAZA
\ � o
QtO
19
ZOI-i N 6 MA P 11
' R�31oSi1
J104.4
:�.
PT-N COT5 S- 2? t
VICl RIly be DraCly rtrCRILeCLS, [1tt1
d Li
615 Creston Road, P.O.Box 305 Paso Robles,California 93446 (805)238-7447 CHECKED
l 738 Higuera Street, Suite A, San Luis Obispo, California 93401 (805)543-0729. OF I
---
.. --
i
'13 51-. -
- -�345 •-- - - _. --- _ -
---?
1
-
'7341 - -
no-NNW" NNW
_. _
ku
7Z
ST/9R S' L.AWr-t---NCC
AVDF- Usr PTIN STs T- Z�
Bob Lawnenee
StaA Station 101
;i
�i 1��oF. ��T
.,
1 �G°a/rl
`..i
'I
�.
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: CITY MANAGER June 9, 1982
FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW R820414 :1
LOCATION: 5005 Palma (Lot 32, Block QA)
APPLICANT: F & M Construction (Harcourt)
REQUEST: To allow construction of four multiple family residential
units .
On June 7, 1982 the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on
the subject matter unanimously approving authorization of a Condition-
al Negative Declaration and approving the apartment project subject to
Conditions 1-14 as set forth in the attached Staff Report.
The Commission discussed the proposed curb, gutter and sidewalk re-
quirements as well as several minor revisions needed on the plans.
Fred Ebhardt, applicant, appeared and indicated his concurrence with
the Staff recommendation.
No one else appeared on the matter .
LAWRENCE STEVENS �� MOVIRAY WARDEN
Planning Director cilty M ager
/Ps
1
r 17FFF
F Fj r� r 1979 CITY OF ATASCADERO
CAD �� Planning Department June 7, 1982
STAFF REPORT
SUBJECT: DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW R820414: 1
LOCATION: 5005 Palma Avenue (Lot 32, Block QA)
APPLICANT: F & M Construction (Harcourt)
REQUEST: To allow construction of four multiple-family residential
units (condominiums) .
BACKGROUND
1. Existing Zoning: ' R-2-B-2-D (506)
2. General Plan: Low Density Multiple Family Residential (ten
dwelling units per acre maximum)
3. Environmental Determination: An initial study environmental de-
scription form has been completed. The Planning Director has J
prepared a Draft Conditional Negative Declaration indicating the {
project will not have a significant adverse effect upon the en-
vironment if certain mitigation measures are incorporated into the
project.
4. Site Conditions: The subject property has an average 9% grade
sloping down from the northeast property line to the southwest
property line (Palma Avenue) . The lot contains two oak trees and
some native grasses. There are currently no structures on site
and no street improvements have been done along Palma Avenue on
San Jacinto Road. The site is bounded on the southeast by the
Atascadero Grange Hall and on the northeast by single family resi-
dences. To the northwest across San Jacinto Road is the Church of
Christ and to the southwest across Palma Avenue are single family
residences.
5. Project Description: The applicant proposes to construct four
multiple-family residential units as condominiums on an existing
0 . 42 acre lot. The proposed structure will be four three-bedroom
units with two car garages , each containing 2163 square feet of
gross floor area. Exterior elevations indicate use of stucco ex-
terior with wood trim and a fiberglass shingle roof. The three
northern units will have a common drive access off San Jacinto
Road and two open guest parking spaces. The fourth unit will have
drive access off Palma Avenue. The applicant also requests per-
mission to place a twenty square foot, permanent project sign just
north of the driveway entrance on San Jacinto Road.
0
Departmental Review R820414:1 (F&M Construction)
STAFF COMMENTS
Staff has reviewed the project and notes that it conforms to appli-
cable development standards except for a 20 square foot project sign
on the site . Signs are not permitted in the R-2 Zone with the excep-
tion of the home occupation business sign. There is also a problem
with driveway circulation on San Jacinto since the guest parking space
closest to the road is unusable with the proposed turning radii and
driveway widths. This concern can be resolved by reorienting the
spaces slightly or by eliminating one of the guest spaces. The
proposed arrangement would necessitate several forward and back-up
maneuvers to get into and out of the space. Staff is also concerned
with onsite grading since this lot appears to have a high water table.
Improvements will be necessary to intercept offsite flows across pub-
lic property. Grading should be kept to a minimum.
FINDINGS
1. The project will not have a significant adverse effect upon the
environment and the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report
is not necessary.
2. The site of the proposed multiple family residential use is ade-
quate in size and shape to accommodate said use and all yards,
fencing, parking, landscaping and other features required by the
Atascadero Municipal Code.
3. Streets in the vicinity of the proposed use are adequate to carry
the quantity and kind of traffic generated.
4 . The proposed use will have no adverse effect on abutting property
or the permitted use thereof provided all conditions are complied
with.
5. The establishment and conduct of the proposed multiple family res-
idential use for which the Departmental Review is sought will not
be detrimental to the public welfare or be injurious to property
or improvements in the neighborhood.
RECOMMENDATION
Based upon the above Findings, the Planning Department recommends:
A) Issuance of a Conditional Negative Declaration as follows:
1. Adequate provision shall be made for drainage and erosion
control and protection in conjunction with site development.
2
Departmental Review R820414:1 (F&M Construction)
2. Provision shall be made to minimize unnecessary grading and
tree removal; and
B) Approval of Departmental Review R820414: 1 subject to the following
conditions:
1. Site development including buildings, driveways, parking,
landscaping and other features shall be consistent with plans
submitted including modifications included herein.
2. Submit two copies of detailed landscape and irrigation plans
indicating size, type and spacing of plant materials proposed
for review and approval by the Planning Department prior to
issuance of building permits.
a. Raised concrete curbs or similar shall border each
planter area.
b. Plant materials shall be sized to achieve a mature ap-
pearance within three years.
C. The type of irrigation system shall depend on the type
of plant materials used and their watering needs.
d. Both existing oak trees shall be retained.
3 . In the event that archeological resources are discovered on
the subject site during construction of this project, said
resources are to remain undisturbed after discovery and con-
struction activity shall cease immediately. The Planning
Department is to be notified so that proper disposition of
the resources may be accomplished. Construction may resume
only upon authorization by the Planning Department.
4. Building architecture shall be consistent with elevations
submitted.
a. Roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted
since it cannot be adequately screened.
5. Provision shall be made for a paved and enclosed trash stor-
age area in a location approved by the Planning Department.
6. All new utilities and utility connections shall be placed
underground.
7. Outdoor lighting fixtures shall be designed to minimize on-
site and offsite glare.
8. Submit two sets of grading and drainage plans indicating
grade of building pads, flow lines at top of curb, etc. , for
review and approval by the Planning Department prior to
issuance of any permits.
3
Departmental Review R820414: 1 (F&M Construction)
a. Drainage from site shall not be allowed to flow directly
to adjacent properties or across any public sidewalks or
driveways.
b. All grading shall conform to Appendix Chapter 70 of the
Uniform Building Code. Any grading necessary for site
development shall be subject to first securing necessary
permits.
9 . Parking shall be provided generally as shown on plans sub-
mitted. Parking and access areas shall be paved with a min-
imum 2"AC on adequate base. Spaces not located within gar-
ages shall be striped and provided with sheel stops or ap-
proved functional equivalent.
a. The guest parking space shall be redesigned to provide
for required turning radius and may be reduced in number
to one.
10 . The project shall be connected to community water and sewer
system. Submit evidence from Atascadero Mutual Water Com-
pany and Atascadero Sanitation District indicating that they
are willing and able to provide service prior to issuance of
permits.
a. Each condominium unit shall be separately connected to
the sewer.
11. The fire hydrant at the northeast corner of San Jacinto and
and Palma shall be upgraded as necessary to the satisfaction
of the Fire Department.
12. Install concrete curb, gutter and all-weather sidewalk along
the entire San Jacinto frontage and install all-weather
shoulder along the entire Palma frontage. Said improvements
to be constructed under an inspection agreement and encroach-
ment permit issued by the Public Works Department.
a. Improvement drawings shall be submitted to the Public
Works Department for approval.
b. Any dedications necessary to accommodate required street
widths shall be made.
C. The northeasterly ten feet of improvements on San
Jacinto will not have to be completed at time of con-
struction provided that a long-term waiver is approved
by the Public Works Department to complete the improve-
ments and move the utility pole at a later date when
additional improvements are needed in the future.
13. This Departmental Review approval is granted for a maximum
period of one year from the date of final approval unless a
time extension is granted by the Planning Director pursuant
to a written request filed a minimum of ten days prior to
4
Departmental Review R820414:1 (F&M Construction)
13. This Departmental Review approval is granted for a maximum
period of one year from the date of final approval unless a
time extension is granted by the Planning Director pursuant
to a written request filed a minimum of ten days prior to
the expiration date.
14. All conditions of approval established herein shall be com-
plied with prior to occupancy of the buildings by the pro-
posed use.
ACTION
The Planning Commission should, by motion, direct Staff as deemed
appropriate.
REPORT PREPARED B
FRS BUSS
Associate Planner
REPORT APPROVED BY:
LAWRENCE STEVENS
Planning Director �t
/ps
5
r/•7 / ` �� RS i J'
WI
y
:-��s a.ca• . �•
c
I Y
G
R•]ii•L JC�3SS'•
• r • C �-, � tet.
I�:I�:l viii � ► . .
i
�n1
ti �1 ASC •
•'J � ,lam �►
v.
b r
a- o
m �-- —
J�
\ 11
D
if
Al-
PALMA AVL. ..
�9 tt r
FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP AT 820414 : 1
LOCATION: 5005 Palma (Lot 32, Block QA)
APPLICANT: F & M Construction (Harcourt)
REQUEST: To allow subdivision of four residential units into air-
space condominiums.
On June 7, 1982 the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on
the subject matter unanimously approving authorization of a Condition-
al Negative Declaration and approving the air-space subdivision sub-
ject to Conditions 1-12 as set forth in the attached Staff Report.
The Commission discussed the matter only briefly.
Fred Ebhardt, applicant, appeared and indicated his concurrence with
the Staff recommendation.
No one else appeared on the matter .
LAWRENCE SV S M RVAY
L 1A DEN
Planning Director Cit Ma ger
/Ps
1
SUBJECT: Tentative Parcel Map AT820414:1
LOCATION: 5005 Palma Avenue, (Block QA, Lot 32)
APPLICANT: F and M Construction (Harcourt)
REQUEST: To allow subdivision of four residential units into
airspace
BACKGROUND
1. Existing zoning: , R-2-B-2-D (506)
2. General Plan: Low Density Multiple Family Residential (10 dwell-
ing units per acre maximum) .
3. Environmental Determination: An initial study environmental de-
scription form has been completed. The Planning Director has pre-
pared a Draft Conditional Negative Declaration indicating the
project will not have a significant adverse effect upon the envi-
ronment if certain mitigating measures are incorporated into the
project.
4. Site Conditions: The subject property has an average 9% grade
sloping down from the northeast property line to the southwest
property line (Palma Avenue) . The lot contains two oak trees and
some native grasses. There are currently no structures on site
and no street improvements have been done along Palma Avenue or
San Jacinto Road. The site is bounded on the southeast by the
Atascadero Grange Hall and on the northeast by single family resi-
dences. To the northwest across San Jacinto Road is the Church of
Christ and to the southwest across Palma Avenue are single family
residences.
5. Project Description: The applicant requests permission to create
four air-space residential lots (condominiums) for the purpose of
individual sales. The applicant intends to form a Homeowners'
Association and prepare Conditions, Covenants and Restrictions to
govern operation and maintenance of the property.
STAFF COMMENTS
On Thursday, May 6 , 1982, the Subdivision Review Board met with the
applicant, Fernando Ebhardt, and Gary Harcourt, his architect, to dis-
cuss the project. Also attending were Larry Stevens, Planning Direc-
tor; Fred Buss, Associate Planner; Joel Moses, Associate Planner;
2. The fire hydrant may need to be upgraded.
3. Certain curb, gutter and sidewalk improvements will be required on
San Jacinto.
4. A drainage problem exists from the site where water crosses Palma
Avenue and will need to be corrected.
5. Sewer connection would be required for each unit.
6. Concern that a retaining wall may be required along the northeast
proeprty line.
7. Concern about springs or a high water table that may exist on
site.
FINDINGS
1. The project will not have a significant adverse effect upon the
environment and the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report
is not necessary.
2. The project conforms to all applicable zoning and subdivision reg-
ulations and is consistent with the 1980 Atascadero General
Plan.
RECOMMENDATION
Based upon the above Findings, the Planning Department recommends the
following:
A. Issuance of a Conditional Negative Declaration as follows:
1. Adequate provisions shall be made for drainage and erosion
control and protection in conjuction with site development.
2. Provision shall be made to minimize grading and tree removal.
B. Approval of Tentative Parcel Map AT820414: 1 subject to the follow-
ing conditions:
1. The applicant shall establish Covenants, Conditions, and Re-
strictions (CC&Rs) for the regulation of land use, control of
nuisances and architectural control of all buildings and fa-
cilities.
2
2. Provision shall be made for connection of each individual
condominium unit to the City sewer system at time of develop-
ment and a Note so stating shall appear on the Final Map.
3. Water shall be obtained from the Atascadero Mutual Water Com-
pany and water lines shall exist at the parcel frontage prior
to filing of the Final Map. A letter from the Water Company
indicating they are willing and able to serve the property
shall be submitted to the Planning Department prior to recor-
dation of the Final Map.
4 . All other available utilities not already in place shall be
extended underground to each parcel frontage at the time of
building permit.
5. Effort shall be made to minimize grading that would be dis-
ruptive to the natural topography and removal of existing
mature trees. The following shall appear as a Note on the
Final Map:
"No trees shall be removed without compliance with applicable
City ordinances. No grading shall commence without an appro-
priate permit and compliance with applicable City ordin-
ances."
6 . ' The fire hydrant at the northeast corner of San Jacinto Raod
and Palma Avenue shall be upgraded as necessary to the satis-
faction of the Fire Department.
7. All pipeline and other easements of record shall be shown on
the Final Map. A letter shall be submitted from each utility
company indicating the nature and extent of any building re-
strictions. A note so stating such restrictions shall appear
on the Final Map.
8. Install concrete curb, gutter and all weather sidewalk along
the entire San Jacinto frontage and install all-weather
shouldering along the entire Palma frontage. Said improve-
ments are to be constructed under an inspection agreement and
encroachment permit issued by the Public Works Department.
a. Improvement drawings shall be submitted to the Public
Works Department for approval and any dedications neces-
sary to accommodate required street widths shall be
made.
3
improvements and move the telephone pole at a later date
when additional improvements are needed in the future .
9. That all conditions of approval herein specified are to be
complied with prior to the filing of the Final Map.
10. Approval of this Tentative Tract Map shall expire 24 months
from the date of this approval unless an extension of time is
granted pursuant to a written request prior to the expiration
date.
11. A Final Map in compliance with all conditions set forth here-
in shall be submitted for review and approval in accordance
with the Subdivision Map Act and the City Lot Division Ordin-
ance prior to recordation.
a. Monuments shall be set at all new property corners and a
Registered Civil Engineer or licensed land surveyor
shall submit a letter certifying that the monuments have
been set prior to recordation, unless certification is
received that corners are already monumented.
b. A Final Title Policy (CLTA or ALTA) shall be submitted
for review in conjuction with the processing of the Fi-
nal Map.
12. This Tentative Parcel Map shall become null and void if De-
partmental Review R820414: 1 is not approved in a manner which
will allow the proposed development.
ACTION
The Planning Commission should by motion direct Staff as deemed appro-
priate.
TO APPROVE: Motion to adopt findings and set conditions.
TO DENY: Motion setting findings for denial.
REPORT PREPARED BY:
RED BUSS
Associate Planner
REPORT APPROVED BY:
LAWRENCE STEVENS
Planning Director
4
fI
Y J
r� •
1
{
- r
.1
k�V
� I • '4
i •
z
Z e e • e-z' �
S . W
� Y f• H R �
r
W
� • 6 L
W
Q 2
r9•.9 Y r t � f_� - a
y % I
~..
a
0� • 6
ir• .,ice^ r
i9 ti A - 'r �/ �1 � •
------- ---
- -- -m I w
- - --------------------
-- - (L
w
(3� Q
H
0
T*•W!K o'er� Z �.
oil; —
etaiCL
Ell
e
�a
�` -
v
�.
�.�
'�
,. i
... _j
'.'.�
.S g
i
- i
-. � :�
3
The following items of concern were discussed:
1) Correction to the maps certificates
2) Potential fire hydrant requirements and water main
extension.
3) Standard road improvements on Santa Cruz
4) Percolation test
5) Minimum lot size in relation to the distance from the center
of town.
6) Access to both parcels
7) Location of leach fields
8) 50 foot set back from natural water courses
The Applicant was requested to submit additional information
showing a slope profile of the access and a map showing potential
building sites and leach field locations.
A review of the plan and profile for the driveway easement
indicates that there will be nearly 200 lineal feet of 4 ' (approx)
cut with two 2 ' - 3 ' fills about 50 feet in length. This is
fairly extensive grading for a private driveway and could result
in some adverse visual effects.
FINDINGS
1. The application, if revised as recommended, conforms to applicable
zoning and subdivision regulations and is consistent with the
1980 Atascadero General Plan.
2. The application as submitted together with the recommended condi-
tions will not have a significant adverse effect upon the environ-
ment, and therefore the preparation of an Environmental Impact
Report is not necessary.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Based upon the above Findings, the Planning Department recommends the
following:
A) Issuance of a Conditional Negative Declaration as follows:
1. Adequate provisions shall be made for drainage and erosion
control and protection in conjunction with site development
and road construction; and
2. Adequate provision shall be made in design of private sewage
disposal systems to minimize effects on natural watercourses.
B) Approval of Tentative Parcel Pap AT820318 : 1 subject to the
following conditions:
1. Private sewage disposal systems will -be an acceptable method
of sewage disposal, if reports and design are acceptable.
All tests, reports, and designs shall conform to methods and
guidelines prescribed by the Manual of Septic Tank Practice
and other applicable City Ordinances. The following shall
appear on the Final Map.
"Appropriate soils reports including a percolation test, a
test to determine the presence of ground water, and a log
of a soil boring to a minimum depth of ten (10) feet shall be
submitted to the Planning Department prior to the issuance
of a building permit. Where soils reports indicate that con-
ventional soil absorption systems are not acceptable, City
approval of plans for an alternative private sewage disposal
system, designed by a Registered Civil Engineer, shall be re-
quired. Depending upon the system, more restrictive require-
ments may be imposed. "
2 . Water shall be obtained from the Atascadero Mutual Water Company
and water lines shall exist at each parcel frontage prior
to filing of the Final Map. A letter from the water company
indicating they are willing and able to serve the property
shall be submitted to the Planning Department prior to re-
cordation of the final Map.
3 . All other available utilities not already in place shall be
extended underground to each parcel frontage at the time of
building permit.
4 . One fire hydrant of a type and size specified by the City
Fire Department shall be installed by the applicant on
Santa Cruz Road near the proposed access easement at the
easterly corner of the site. Exact location and manner of
placement shall be subject to the approval of the Fire Depart-
ment. A letter from the Fire Department certifying the in-
stallaton of the hydrant shall be received by the Planning
Department prior to the recordation of the Final Map.
5. The driveway access shall be improved to at least the
following minimum standards:
- an improved width of 12 feet
i
- unobstructed vertical clearance of fourteen (14) feet
These standards shall appear as notes on the Final Map.
event will ariveways oe a.ilowea wnicn exceea zuo in slope.
In the event any portion of a driveway is shared, improvement
of the shared portion shall be a requirement made in con-
junction with the first building permit. Notes to these
effects shall appear on the Final Map.
7 . Efforts shall be made to minimize grading that would be dis-
ruptive to the natural topography and removal of exisitng
mature trees. The following shall appear as a Note on the
Final Map:
"No trees shall be removed without compliance with appli-
cable City ordinances. No grading shall commence without
an appropriate permit and compliance with applicable City
ordinances. "
8 . Roof materials for all structures shall be Class C rating or
better and a Note to that effect shall appear on the Final
Map.
9 . Drainage swales shall be indicated on the Final Map and a
Note shall appear on the Final Map which states:
"Any modification of the ground during site development with-
in fifty (50) feet of the drainage swales shall be subject to
approval by the Planning and Public Works Departments. "
10 . Final grading and drainage plans prepared by a Registered
Civil Engineer for development on each parcel may be re-
quired to be submitted for review and approval by the Plan-
ning and Public Works Departments prior to issuance of build-
ing permits. A note to this effect shall appear on the Final
Map.
11. All pipeline and other easements of record shall be shown on
the Final Map. A letter shall be submitted from each utility
company indicating the nature and extent of any building re-
strictions . A Note so stating such restrictions shall appear
on the Final Map.
12 . The access easement shall also be designated for use as a
public utility easement.
13. An offer of dedication to the public for road purposes for
twenty (20) feet along Santa Cruz Road for the entire property
frontage shall be made by the actual easement owner. Said
offer to be shown on the Final Map and be made by certificate
thereon.
"��%500
r" -V- � F:
1918 t G r 'rtn ry 1979
CITY OF ATASCADERO
Planning Department June 7, 1982
STAFF REPORT
SUBJECT: Tentative Parcel Map AT 820408: 1
LOCATION: 3763 Ardilla Road (Lots 26 and 27, and portion
of 44 , Block 17)
APPLICANT: Norman and Helen Rich (Hilliard)
REQUEST: To allow the redivision of approximately 13. 5
acres into 3 parcels of 5 . 0, 2. 6 , and 5 . 9 acres .
BACKGROUND
1. Existing Zoning: R-A-B-D-1-D (506)
2. General Plan: Suburban Single Family Residential
3. Environmental Determination: An initial study environmental
description form has been completed for the project. The
Planning Director has prepared a Draft Negative Declaration
indicating the project will not have a significant adverse
effect upon the environment if certain mitigation measures
are incorporated into the project.
4 . Site Conditions: The 13 . 5 acre site is currently partly
developed. The only structure on the property is a house
on proposed parcel A. The property is characterized by
slight to moderate slopes up from Maricopa Road to the access
way across the southwest property boundary. Vegetation
consists of an old orchard (overlapping parts of all three -
proposed parcels) , natural grasses and a large live oak.
The site is located between Maricopa Road and Ardilla Avenue
near the northern extent of Portola Road. The surrounding
area is developed primarily as large lot residential.
5. Project Description: The applicant is proposing to redivide
the 13+ acre site into three parcels with Parcel A to be
5. 9 acres (site of existing house) , Parcel B to be 2 . 6 acres
and Parcel C to be 5 . 0 acres. Site access would be either
from Maricopa Road or the Ardilla Avenue private driveway.
Page Two
Re: Tentative Parcel Map AT 820408 : 1 (Rich)
June 7, 1982
STAFF COMMENTS
On May 6, 1982 the Subdivision Review Board met with Mr. Rich,
the applicant, and Mr. Hilliard, applicant' s surveyor. Also
present at that meeting were: Larry Stevens, Planning Director;
Joel Moses, Associate Planner; Patsy West, Engineering Aide, and
Shirley Moore, Planning Commissioner. The following items of
concern were discussed at the meeting:
1. Application to be treated as parcel map.
2. No road improvements required.
3. Location of existing septic system.
4 . Possible improvement of Ardilla driveway to road.
FINDINGS
1. The project as presented will not have a significant adverse
effect upon the environment and the preparation of an Environ-
mental Impact Report is not necessary.
2 . The application as presented conforms to the applicable
zoning regulations and is consistent with the 1980 Atascadero
General Plan.
RECOMMENDATION
Based upon the findings, the Planning Department recommends as
follows:
A) Issuance of a Conditional Negative Declaration and
B) Approval of Tentative Parcel Map AT 820408: 1 subject to the
following conditions:
1. Private sewage disposal systems will be an acceptable.
method of sewage disposal, if reports, tests, and design
are acceptable. All tests, reports and designs shall
conform to methods and guidelines prescribed by the
Manual of Septic Tank Practice and other applicable
City ordinances. The following shall appear as a Note
on the Final Map:
"Appropriate soils reports including a percolation test,
a test to determine the presence of ground water, and a
log of a soil boring to a minimum depth of ten (10) feet
shall be submitted to the Atascadero Planning Department
prior to the issuance of a building permit on each lot.
Where soils reports indicate that conventional soil
Page Three
Re : Tentative Parcel Map AT 820408 :1 (Rich)
June 7, 1982
absorption systems are not acceptable, City approval of
plans for an alternative private sewage disposal system,
designed by a registered civil engineer, shall be required.
Depending upon the system, more restrictive requirements
may be imposed. "
2. Water shall be obtained from the Atascadero Mutual Water
Company and water operable facilities shall exist at the
property frontage prior to filing of the final map. A
letter from the Water Company indicating they are willing
and able to serve the property shall be submitted to the
Planning Department prior to recordation of the Final Map.
3. All other available utilities not already in place shall
be extended underground to each parcel frontage at the
time of building permit.
4 . Plan and profile drawings of proposed driveway(s) shall
be submitted for approval by the Public Works and Planning
Departments in order to determine average grade and
appropriate improvement requirements. If average slope
exceeds 120 , paved improvement would be a requirement at
the time of application for building permit. Otherwise,
an all-weather surface would be required similarly. In
the event any portion of the driveway will be shared,
improvement of that shared portion shall be a requirement
made in conjunction with the first building permit. Notes
to these effects shall appear on the Final Map.
5 . With regard to improvement standards for the driveway,
the following note shall appear on the Final Map:
"The private driveways shall be improved to a minimum
width of twelve (12) feet with an unobstructed vertical
clearance of fourteen (14) feet. "
6. Effort shall be made to minimize grading that would be
disruptive to the natural topography and removal of
existing, mature trees. The following shall appear as
a note on the Final Map:
"No trees shall be removed without compliance with
applicable City ordinances. No grading shall commence
without an appropriate permit and compliance with appli-
cable City ordinances. "
Page Four
Re: Tentative Parcel Map AT 820408 : 1 (Rich)
June 7, 1982
7. All pipeline and other easements of record shall be
shown on the Final Map. A letter shall be submitted
from each utility company indicating the nature and
extent of any building restrictions. A note so stating
such restrictions shall appear on the Final Map.
8 . A Final Parcel Map in compliance with all conditions
set forth herein shall be submitted for review and
approval in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and
the City Lot Division Ordinance prior to recordation.
a. Monuments shall be set at all new property corners
created and a registered civil engineer or licensed
land surveyor shall submit a letter certifying that
the monuments have been set prior to recordation.
b. A final title policy (CTLA of ATLA) shall be submitted
for review in conjunction with the processing of the
Final Map.
9. Approval of this Tentative Parcel Map shall expire two
years from the date of final approval unless an exten-
sion of time is granted pursuant to a written request
prior to the expiration date.
ACTION
Direct Staff by motion as deemed appropriate.
REPORT PREPARED
MARK A. MUZNY
Planning Intern
REPORT APPROVED BY
LAWRENCE STEVENS
Planning Director
T 1-9.9-4,
(517,gg
P oa 62
\ O
• �IN ,-. M 15.56 'A /',,1 ,mac
xk
\
�►ga332'� /9 \
6'
19
I
10
;It o
x.44
SCO
w
a
ti
119.7 l-^Cl
e ?, �z5.7
fa9.7a
Oma°
09,w' �► tse.sz; .�, � �
�y S.ar r2' i G
I.° CD
r
I 0 N
1501� �
y T4z�i;�tldJ 542° O�
Q'1'4
•� °h� �a ���lv wlo �, - ' � FIs � / I
.Ila
f'sI sol, �� n1 E
Heys ro
� i
('ZD670
'G D�
/3949, Al
w
�p N y/.0 �• b �� �� ti gE%3i/.�a
off' A O(�
Cb M
Iq
11
LLoc,ATON Map
AT 620"I o s*
''W�� ��I\ HILt.1At2D�
CJ 4 \ �i7CD�7 4CZDIL�A
21.0, Z-7, 1,1ew�k 1
co
t0 N t
w � N / < - �/ �/ •N
n
Ny /�
CT
=
•fy.. N 1 N y{ �
D - rf �Ib ,
ri
A IIII , 1 --- v N f tw 111e / ry
1 A - f - w
tv
' I ,) I — I
c w
N NL
to
I ID', ��\ iD ( -\� •{ (A ` 1 �.. l� ...--'1-W O lT3 i:;
//
OD
oj
nr` ` ; w f 4 ..
1�\
A� N `- }N j W
:T /S � � ', � �� W ;'" •'/ 1 I_� N �\ W - - 1. %' � -
i •A �,� t j�
M
r N i .,nom
<< W �4
A to a �' o \ i` _ y_
W
I
W t0 Y. !, r" a\ \ p�(r1\, _ «t ` ___N-•-_ i r
CD
9r O D
! it
0f �� ,•��.. �- t / ' t4 N
CA
CD
3 N
p g„f,
r A U
W -
�. of ��.�,,- _ v: `� \ � �-1,' W � � �•
\`Y\/�i/ \`a' �'�• \.� t�� M\
OW \, r• - /J \. \�•. •J
N
kn
ovp
EP
lip—
ro
Nz
Ln
C»
C:3d
5 _ o i Acr
\
co
Zone- Map
w `wi��/ / d a \: _, 8`09 O ; ( � 1-41 t_4_.1A�p�
Arch L.q
� 'i' '• �. "� .v �1�c'^,/��� �' ��\ fif ��^+ 1���7 2�9,2-7!`1g 6�•P.� 17
4 Lt �• 'ivy�•S� "�i ' y @i .`
@ Q �-'—�—� �• Q h W ti h R Q � j a N D 2
0.
V `
@
kb, io
F3 8
" Qe �®@ a W ti� 'ky �o am•`WRQ }�
� �a g a � ¢ r, i �, •w �o -�l
a 0 \°, � `mm"n n� � w2�€WAi W'sjf��I�c.►
0Qy 01�q JOG Q 4CA
Q p •¢°�+�Q�k nz a
� N
Q �
J
re y -P Q A O
v.�C vim¢ C� O^�i° �'@8@ J �• r1 N 1 W o
H
z
i0
4 Q
°
O � 4
8
- V
O �
O
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: CITY MANAGER June 8, 1982
FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP AT 8203 9:1
LOCATION: 10570 San Marcos & 9600 Laur l (Lot 18, Block 30)
APPLICANT: Frank Atkinson (Twin Cities Engineering)
REQUEST: To allow division of 54 acres into four parcels with
three at seven acres each an one at 32 acres.
On June 7, 1982 the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on
the subject matter unanimously approving authorization of a Condition-
al Negative Declaration and approving the land division subject to
Conditions 1-13 as set forth in the attached Staff Report.
The Commission discussed road improvements and the need for added cir-
culation. The Commission concluded that the request complied with
both the zoning and the General Plan.
Allen Campbell, applicant' s engineer , ap eared and indicated his con-
currence with the Staff recommendation.
No one else appeared on the matter .
LAWRENCE STEVENMURRAY W DEN
Planning Director City Manager
/Ps
- 1
:^
rnint�,r , r� e:�r,
. ' r 11 CITY OF ATASCADERO
`a r i97a
Planning Department June 7, 1982
STAFF REPORT
SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP AT 820309: 1
LOCATION: 10570 San Marcos Road and 9600 Laurel (Lot 18, Block 30)
APPLICANT: Frank Atkinson (Twin Cities Engineering)
REQUEST: To allow division of 54 acres into four parcels with three
at seven acres each and the fourth at 32 acres.
BACKGROUND
1. Existing Zoning: A-1-B-V-5
2. General Plan: Suburban Single Family Residential
3. Environmental Determination: An initial study environmental de-
scription form has been completed. The Planning Director has
prepared a draft Conditional Negative Declaration indicating the
project will not have a significant adverse effect upon the en-
vironment if certain mitigation measures are incorporated into the
project.
4. Site Conditions: The 54 acre site is located between San Marcos
Road (improved) and Laurel Road (under construction) . The por-
tions of Parcels 1 through 3 which front on Laurel Road are rela-
tively hilly. One small section of Parcel 2 has a slope of less
than 10%. The accessible portion of Parcel 3 is mostly 10-20%,
while the accessible portion of Parcel 1 is divided equally be-
tween slopes of 10-20% and 20-30%. The upper portions of these
three parcels have slopes of at least 30% , which accounts for
approximately half the acreage of each lot. Parcel 4 has one
small inaccessible area of less than 10% slope and one area of
10-20% which can be accessed from San Marcos Road. The rest of
the 32 acres is steep, with slopes of 30% and up. There are 3
drainage swales which traverse the 54 acres. Two of them termin-
ate on Parcel 3 and one terminates on Parcel 2 . Vegetation on the
property consists of some grasses and chapparal, with about half
of the acreage being heavily wooded with mature oak trees. Utili-
ties are currently being extended to serve the site.
5. Project Description: The applicant proposes to divide the 54 acre
site into four parcels. Parcels 1 through 3 are seven acres each
fronting on Laurel Road. Parcel 4 is approximately 32 acres
fronting on San Marcos Road. No further division of the 32 acres
is proposed at this time, but the future potential exists. Con-
Tentative Parcel Map AT 820309:1 (Atkinson)
struction of Laurel Road from Santa Lucia Road to Cenegal Road has
been started under an improvement agreement. A portion of Cenegal
Road is also being constructed as part of a tentative map for an
adjoining property. Access to the proposed parcels would be via
private driveways from Laurel (Parcels 1,2, and 3) or San Marcos
(Parcel 4) .
STAFF COMMENTS
On Thursday, May 6, 1982 the Subdivision Review Board met with Mr. At-
kinson and his engineer , Allen Campbell. Also attending the meeting
were: Shirley Moore , Planning Commissioner; Larry Stevens, Planning
Director; Joel Moses, Associate Planner; Jill Kollmann, Planning In-
tern; and Patsy West, Engineering Aide. The following items of con-
cern were discussed at that meeting:
1. Road improvement agreement.
2. Buildable sites.
3. Environmental determination.
4. Tree removal.
5. Area access.
6. Septic.
7 . Fire hydrants.
The primary concern related to this parcel map and future maps in the
general area is circulation. At this time the construction of Laurel
Road and a portion of Cenegal Road will result in a long cul-de-sac.
Future construction of roads in the area will depend on the timing of
future maps. Preliminary review suggests that ultimately Laurel Road
and Cenegal (as far as it goes now) will have to serve upwards of 80
parcels. This may justify consideration of alternatives to create
through roads rather than cul-de-sacs. The incremental nature of the
land division process would indicate the need for a circulation plan
to be devised before a significant number of divisions have taken
place, as road improvements are obtained in conjunction with parcel
maps. Although there is no immediate problem generated by the appli-
cant' s map, it should be recognized that the potential does exist to
create an access problem such as that which currently exists in the
3-F Meadows area.
2
Tentative Parcel Ma AT 820309:1 (Atkinson)
FINDINGS
1. The application conforms to all of the applicable zoning and sub-
division regulations and is consistent with the 1980 Atascadero
General Plan.
2. The application as presented will not have a significant adverse
impact upon the environment and the preparation of an Environmen-
tal Impact Report is not necessary.
RECOMMENDATION
Based upon the above Findings, the Planning Department recommends:
A) Issuance of a Conditional Negative Declaration as follows:
1. Adequate provision shall be made for drainage and erosion
control and protection in conjunction with site development.
2. Provision shall be made to ensure soil stability during and
after construction; and
B) Approval of Tentative Parcel Map AT 820309 : 1 subject to the fol-
lowing conditons:
1. Water shall be obtained from the Atascadero Mutual Water Com-
pany and water lines shall exist at each parcel frontage
prior to filing of the Final Map. A letter from the Water
Company indicating they are willing and able to serve the
property shall be submitted to the Planning Department prior
to recordation of the Final Map.
2. Private sewage disposal systems will be an acceptable method
of sewage disposal, if reports and design are acceptable.
All tests , reports, and designs shall conform to methods and
guidelines prescribed by the Manual of Septic Tank Practice
and other applicable City ordinances. The following shall
appear on the Final Map:
"Appropriate soils reports including a percolation test, a
test to determine the presence of ground water , and a log of
a soil boring to a minimum depth of ten (10) feet shall be
submitted to the Planning Department prior to the issuance of
building permits. Where soils reports indicate that conven-
tional soil absorption systems are not acceptable, City ap-
proval of plans for an alternative private sewage disposal
system, designed by a Registered Civil Engineer , shall be re-
quired. Depending upon the system, more restrictive require-
ments may be imposed."
3
Tentative Parcel Map AT 820309:1 (Atkinson)
3. All other available utilities not already in place shall be
extended underground to each parcel frontage in accordance
with the improvement agreement.
4. A driveway providing access to each building site may be sub-
ject to Planning Department review and approval at the time
of building permit application for each parcel. Plan and
profile drawings may be required. If average slope exceeds
12%, paved improvement would be required, otherwise an all-
weather surface would be required similarly. In no event
will driveways be allowed which exceed 20% in slope.
5. The driveway access shall be improved to at least the follow-
ing minimum standards:
an improved width of 12 feet
- unobstructed vertical clearance of fourteen (14) feet
Notes to these effects shall appear on the Final Map.
6. Effort shall be made to minimize grading that would be dis-
ruptive to the natural topography and removal of existing
mature trees. The following shall appear as a Note on the
Final Map:
"No trees shall be removed without compliance with applicable
City ordinances. No grading shall commence without an appro-
priate permit and compliance with applicable City ordinances.
7 . Laurel Road and Cenegal Road shall be improved in accordance
with City standards and arrangements shall be made for work
to be done under an inspection agreement with the Public
Works Department. Fire hydrants of a type and size specified
by the City Fire Department shall be installed by the appli-
cant, with exact location and manner of placement subject to
Fire Department approval. Road improvements and provisions
for fire hydrants will be in accordance with the improvement
agreement entered into by the applicant when the land was
purchased.
8 . Drainage swales shall be indicated on the Final Map and a
Note shall appear on the Final Map which states:
"Any modification of the ground during site development with-
in fifty (50) feet of the drainage swales shall be subject to
approval by the Planning and Public Works Departments . "
9 . Final grading and drainage plans prepared by a Registered
Civil Engineer for development on each parcel may be required
to be submitted for review and approval by the Planning and
Public Works Departments prior to issuance of building per-
mits. A Note to this effect shall appear on the Final Map.
4
Tentative Parcel Map AT 820309:1 (Atkinson)
10. All pipeline and other easements of record shall be shown on
the Final Map. A letter shall be submitted from each utility
company indicating the nature and extent of any building re-
strictions. A Note so stating such restrictions shall appear
on the final Map.
11. Roof materials for all structures shall be Class C rating or
better and a Note to that effect shall appear on the Final
Map.
12. A Final Map in compliance with all conditions set forth here-
in shall be submitted for review and approval in accordance
with the Subdivision Map Act and the City Lot Division Ordi-
nance prior to recordation.
a. Monuments shall be set at all new property corners cre-
ated and a Registered Civil Engineer or licensed land
surveyor shall submit a letter certifying that the monu-
ments have been set prior to recordation of the Final
Parcel Map.
b. A recently updated preliminary title report shall be
submitted for review in conjunction with the processing
of the Final Map.
13. Approval of this Tentative Parcel Map shall expire two years
from the date of final approval unless an extension of time
is granted pursuant to a written request prior to the expi-
ration date.
ACTION
The Planning Commission should, by motion, direct Staff as deemed
appropriate.
- TO APPROVE: Motion to adopt findings and set conditions.
TO DENY: Motion setting findings for denial.
REPORT PREPARED BY: 'd4zz
JILL KOLLMANN
-Planning Intern
REPORT APPROVED BY:
LAWRENCE STEVENS
Planning Director
5
1 ,
l4
v �•, `.�` - \ X50. �
Oth
W)N
KH--
.sr1 1
I
1 06/OJ' 7-7,Mo'7
kQ�
L:
° oe
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: CITY MANAGER June 8, 1982
FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP AT 820311: 1
LOCATION: 11605 Cenegal (Lot 1, Block 59)
APPLICANT: John White (Twin Cities Engineering)
REQUEST: To allow division of 49 acres into four parcels of 10.1,
10 .1, 7 .3 and 21. 5 acres.
On June 7, 1982 the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on
the subject matter unanimously approving authorization of a Condition-
al Negative Declaration and approving the land division subject to
Conditions 1-13 as set forth in the attached Staff Report.
The Commission discussed road improvements and the need for added cir-
culation. The Commission concluded that the request complied with
both the zoning and the General Plan.
Allen Campbell, applicant' s engineer , appeared and indicated his con-
currence with the Staff recommendation.
No one else appeared on the matter .
Of
LAWRENCE STEV S "RfJRYNY L. WARDEN
Planning Director Ciify Manager
/Ps
1
f r r ir;. vt' Ir
isll'rKa��..e 1
/ CITY OF ATASCADERO
/
CAD Planning Department June 7, 1982
STAFF REPORT
SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP AT 820311: 1
LOCATION: 11605 Cenegal Road (Lot 1, Block 59)
APPLICANT: John White (Twin Cities Engineering)
REQUEST: To allow subdivision of 49 acres into four parcels of
10 .1, 10 .1, 7 . 3 and 21. 5 acres.
BACKGROUND
1. A-1-B-V-5
2. General Plan: Suburban Single Family Residential
3. Environmental Determination: An initial study environmental de-
scription form has been completed. The Planning Director has
prepared a draft Conditional Negative Declaration indicating the
project will not have a significant adverse effect upon the en-
vironment if certain mitigation measures are incorporated into the
project.
4. Site Conditions: The site is located on Cenegal Road and Laurel
Road near Santa Lucia Road. The terrain is steep with slopes
averaging 30% or higher on much of the acreage. Parcels 1 through
3 each have at least one accessible building site where slopes are
about 20%. Parcel 4 has 2 or 3 potentially accessible building
sites where slopes are approximately 20% or less. Vegetation
consists of a mixture of grasses, chapparal and large stands of
mature oak trees. There are no major drainage swales on the site.
Utilities are currently being extended to serve the property.
5. Project Description: The applicant proposes to divide the 49
acres into four parcels of 10 .1, 10 .1, 7 .3 and 21. 5 acres. The
applicant is participating in an improvement agreement to con-
struct Laurel Road and a portion of Cenegal Road and to install
utilities to the front property lines. Access to the proposed
parcels will be from either Laurel (Parcel 3 and 4) or Cenegal
(Parcels 1,2, and 3) . The access to Parcel 4 is proposed via a
private driveway following the Laurel alignment since the appli-
cant proposes not to construct a public road along the frontage
of Parcel 4.
Tentative 820311: 1 (White)Parcel Map
STAFF COMMENTS
On Thursday, May 6 , 1982 the Subdivision Review Board met with Mr .
White and Allen Campbell, Mr . White' s engineer . Also present at that
meeting were: Shirley Moore, Planning Commissioner ; Larry Stevens,
Planning Director; Joel Moses, Associate Planner; Jill Kollmann,
Planning Intern; and Patsy West, Engineering Aide . The following
items of concern were discussed at the meeting:
1. Road improvement agreement.
2. Road name change.
3. Buildable Sites.
4 . Environmental determination.
5. Tree removal.
6. Area access.
7 . Septic.
8. Fire hydrants.
As with the Atkinson application, the primary concern in this area is
the impact of future land divisions to the circulation system. There
may be a need in the future to consider options which will ultimately
result in through roads rather than long cul-de-sacs. Colony maps
indicate that Cenegal is intended to connect with Puente Road (a paper
road) and across a bridge onto Santa Lucia to complete a loop. Due to
topography, the timing of development, and financial constraints, this
option may or may not be exercised in the future, and it is not a con-
trollable factor by the applicant. In any case, the current applica-
tion does not present an immediate circulation problem but does intro-
duce a potential for such in the future.
FINDINGS
1. The application conforms to all of the applicable zoning and sub-
division regulations and is consistent with the 1980 Atascadero
General Plan.
2. The application as presented will not have a significant adverse
impact upon the environment and the preparation of an Environmen-
tal Impact Report is not necessary.
2
Tentative Parcel Map AT 820311: 1 (White) •
RECOMMENDATION -
Based upon the above Findings, the Planning Department recommends:
A) Issuance of a Conditional Negative Declaration as follows:
1. Adequate provision shall be made for drainage and erosion
control and protection in conjunction with site development.
2. Provision shall be made to ensure soil stability during and
after construction; and
B) Approval of Tentative Parcel Map AT 820311: 1 subject to the fol-
lowing conditions:
1. Water shall be obtained from the Atascadero Mutual Water Com-
pany and water lines shall exist at each parcel frontage
prior to filing of the Final Map. A letter from the Water
Company indicating they are willing and able to serve the
property shall be submitted to the Planning Department prior
to recordation of the Final Map.
2. Private sewage disposal systems will be an acceptable method
of sewage disposal if reports and design are acceptable. All
tests , reports, and designs shall conform to methods and
guidelines prescribed by the Manual of Septic Tank Practice
and other applicable City ordinances. The following shall
appear on the Final Map:
"Appropriate soils reports including a percolation test, a
test to determine the presence of ground water , and a log of
a soil boring to a minimum depth of ten (10) feet shall be
submitted to the Planning Department prior to the issuance of
a building permit. Where soils reports indicate that conven-
tional soil absorption systems are not acceptable, City ap-
proval of plans for an alternative private sewage disposal
system, designed by a Registered Civil Engineer , shall be re-
quired. Depending upon the system, more restrictive require-
ments may be imposed."
3. All other available utilities not already in place shall be
extended underground to each parcel frontage in accordance
with the improvement agreement.
4. A driveway providing access to each building site may be sub-
ject to Planning Department review and approval at the time
of building permit application for each parcel. Plan and
profile drawings may be required. If average slope exceeds
12%, paved improvement would be required, otherwise an all-
weather surface would be required similarly. In no event
will driveways be allowed which exceed 20% in slope.
3
Tentative 820311: 1 (White)Parcel Map
5. The driveway access shall be improved to at least the follow-
ing minimum standards:
an improved width of twelve (12) feet
- unobstructed vertical clearance of fourteen (14) feet
Notes to these effects shall appear on the Final map.
6 . Effort shall be made to minimize grading that would be dis-
ruptive to the natural topography and removal of existing
mature trees. The following shall appear as a Note on the
Fnal Map:
"No trees shall be removed without compliance with applicable
City ordinances. No grading shall commence without an appro-
priate permit and compliance with applicable City ordinances.
7. Laurel Road and Cenegal Road shall be improved in accordance
with City standards and arrangements shall be made for work
to be done under an inspection agreement with the Public
Works Department. Fire hydrants of a type and size specified
by the City Fire Department shall be installed by the appli-
cant, with exact location and manner of placement subject to
Fire Department approval. Road improvements and provisions
for fire hydrants will be in accordance with the improvement
agreement entered into by the applicant when the land was
purchased.
a. Laurel Road need not be constructed across the frontage
of Parcel 4.
b. A cul-de-sac turnaround including any required dedica-
tion shall be provided at the terminus of Laurel Road.
8. Drainage swales shall be indicated on the Final Map and a
Note shall appear on the Final Map which states:
"Any modification of the ground during site development with-
in fifty (50) feet of the drainage swales shall be subject to
approval by the Planning and Public Works Departments .
9. Final grading and drainage plans prepared by a Registered
Civil Engineer for development on each parcel may be required
to be submitted for review and approval by the Planning and
Public Works Departments prior to issuance of building per-
mits. A note to this effect shall appear on the Final Map.
10 . All pipeline and other easements of record shall be shown on
the Final Map. A letter shall be submitted from each utility
company indicating the nature and extent of any building re-
strictions. A Note so stating such restrictions shall appear
on the Final Map.
4
Tentative Parcel MIPAT 820311: 1 (White) •
11. Roof materials for all structures shall be Class C rating or
better and a Note to that effect shall appear on the Final
Map.
12. A Final Map in compliance with all conditions set forth here-
in shall be submitted for review and approval in accordance
with the Subdivision Map Act and the City Lot Division Ordi-
nance prior to recordation.
a. Monuments shall be set at all new property corners cre-
ated and a Registered Civil Engineer or licensed land
surveyor shall submit a letter certifying that the monu-
ments have been set prior to recordation of the Final
Parcel Map.
b. A recently updated preliminary title report shall be
submitted for review in conjunction with the processing
of the Final Parcel Map.
1'3. Approval of this Tentative Parcel Map shall expire two years
from the date of final approval unless an extension of time
is granted pursuant to a written request prior to the expi-
ration date.
ACTION
The Planning Commission should, by motion, direct Staff as deemed
appropriate.
TO APPROVE: Motion to adopt findings and set conditions.
TO DENY: Motion setting findings for denial.
REPORT PREPARED BY:
JILL KOLLMANN
Planning Intern
REPORT APPROVED BY: 16Z~
LAWRENCE STEVENS
Planning Director
/Ps
5
s
q,�32p-P
-3-320_p
V
s
A-1-B-V-S o
D C\
e
A
1 4
3
L
i
-// zONiN(i 1
AT $20309 !
A- I -Q-V-5 SAN t'IA\ZeoS F LAQRF-L -':<O ADS
b LOT 18, (3LOc-1I, 30
Ala
55-041-05
i
J
` 0
\ -
011
0
w
��•� ,� �� ) f v, 00 �
o SITE LOGATlO
\•;-,,\J_ .' ,• i � : _ � gT 820309� ! ( i
SAN MARCOS E LAUREL ROA,c
LoT I g, B LO G K 30
( � � �
-_.
, ,
� � i� -----_� a� �� ,���i;;
o ( -- �\ ��n \ \
�- �� � � .�
_' � � �oo� I //
�^�' � \ 1 \ \ � �
� � /
�,� ���,
a ,
I /� ���,�
i � ad .oFs� � /�� ��°
_ _-
� �
� / �— ��� �
� \ ( �� �
% i� . \ 1 � o
I ^ ��0� ` I
� / � l ���� ( � i � �
� 1
I
/ � �� �
bad (/ (�� \ � o
� - ;
\\ /)��,61 o B
� / a"
i �
/ ��`
n�
o�r ati O'..0 C��IOS t.�Q ��
J`�7 � ��� �����G�� j� is
off, � �; o����� � �n� �
� � .�'_ I�
°� '� � {� � `� ���cSa ti oho is
c� I� � �� ,� ��n��� is
Lk � � � �jOCG� ��
��,t? ���� �� v�T �
r �� ^� �
s�I
`-'�:
�� a,
ll A-3-320-P
h-` a X320-P
A
s
i
0
A
1 ®
1
Zo N\NC-1
A- ! -8-u_5 Ar SZO311 - I
1I(n05 CGCNEGAL
LC)T I BLOCV- �9
55-Iq l -O 2
3 v 5
Gb
ZZ�� -
es
00
................
P s
FF
15 jT E- L 0 CAT t C)
A-r BZCZt 1: 1
LOT I Q>L-0 5-9
-100
Iv
p
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: CITY MANAGER June 8, 1982
FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP AT 820226 : 1
LOCATION: 14000-14700 Santa Lucia (Lots 1,2, 3 and 10 of Block 85)
APPLICANT: Tenneco Realty Development (Twin Cities Engineering)
REQUEST: To allow resubdivision of four existing lots totaling 57
acres into six parcels of 6.1, 5.0, 5. 0 , 9. 0 , 5.0 and
27 .0 acres.
On June 7, 1982 the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on
the subject matter unanimously approving authorization of a Condition-
al Negative Declaration and approving the proposed land division sub-
ject to Conditions 1-17 as set forth in the attached Staff Report with
the following revisions:
1) Deletion of Condition 15 concerning repair of Santa Lucia Road.
2) Modification of Condition 14 to read:
"Improvements required by Conditions 3,7,8, and 9 may be
deferred. . . . "
3) Modification of Condition 7c to read:
"A hammerhead turnaround shall be constructed between the inter-
section of Santa Lucia and the new road and the terminus of Santa
Lucia, with the design and location to be approved by the City
Engineer . "
The Commission discussed the need for turnaround emergency vehicles
with "hammerhead" design deemed appropriate to minimize grading. It
was the consensus of the Commission that the proposal was consistent
with zoning and the General Plan.
Allen Campbell, applicant' s engineer , appeared and indicated his con-
currence with the Staff recommendation including the three minor re-
visions which had previously been discussed with Staff .
No one else appeared on the matter.
AWRENCE STEVE MUR L. ARDEN
Planning Director City Manager
1
r �, CITY OF ATASCADERO
c is79
19�s cC ; r_
Planning Department June 7, 1982
STAFF REPORT
SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP AT 820226: 1
LOCATION: 14000-14700 Santa Lucia Road
APPLICANT: Tenneco Realty Development Corporation (Twin Cities
Engineering)
REQUEST: To allow resubdivision of four existing lots totaling
57 acres into six parcels of 6 .1, 5.0, 5.0, 9.0, 5. 0 and
27.0 acres.
BACKGROUND
1. Existing Zoning: A-1-B-V-5
2. General Plan: Suburban Single Family Residential
3. Environmental Determination: An initial study environmental de-
scription form has been completed. The Planning Director has
prepared a Conditional Negative Declaration indicating the project
will not have a significant adverse effect upon the environment if
certain mitigation measures are incorporated into the project.
4. Site Description: The site is bounded on the south by Santa Lucia
Road and Graves Creek. The property is also bounded on the west
by the City limits. All adjacent property is presently undevel-
oped , but road improvements are being installed adjoining the site
and to the south that will lead to future residential development.
The site' s topography is characterized as being hilly with very
steep hillsides, deep ravines and generally flat hill tops, cov-
ered by a good number of mature oak trees and mature grasses.
Development of roads into the area is proceeding as a result of a
prior tentative map.
5. Project Description: The applicant is proposing to resubdivide
four existing lots totaling approximately 57 acres of land into
six lots. All lots will have access to Santa Lucia Road. Lot
sizes are as follows:
Tentative Parcel Map AT 820226:1 (Tenneco)
Existing Lot Existing Size Proposed Lot Proposed Size
No. No.
1 5 . 3 acres 1 6. 1 acres
2 10 .0 acres 2 5.0 acres
- ---- 3 5 . 0 acres
3 9 . 8 acres 4 9.0 acres
10 32.0 acres 5 5. 0 acres
- --- 6 27.0 acres
STAFF COMMENTS
On Thursday, April 8, 1982 the Subdivision Review Board met to review
the parcel map application, but due to bad weather and road condi-
tions in the area, the members of the S .R.B. were unable to visit the
site. The Board was subsequently unable to discuss the proposed map
and continued the matter until the May S .R.B. meeting.
On Thursday, May 6, 1982 the Subdivision Review Board met with Jerry
Ladd of Tenneco and Allen Campbell , representing Mr . Ladd, to discuss
the project. Also attending the meeting were: Larry Stevens, Plan-
ning Director; Larry McPherson, Public Works Director ; Mike Hicks,
Fire Chief; Joel Moses, Associate Planner; Patience West, Engineering
Aide; Jill Kollmann, Planning Intern; and Shirley Moore , Planning
Commissioner . The following items of concern were discussed:
1. Access to individual lots.
2. Buildable sites and septic system design.
3. Fire hydrant requirements.
4. Driveway plans and profiles.
5. Utility easements.
FINDINGS
1. The application, if revised as recommended, conforms to applicable
zoning and subdivision regulations and is consistent with the 1980
Atascadero General Plan.
2. The application as submitted together with the recommended condi-
tions will not have a significant adverse effect upon the environ-
ment, and therefore, the preparation of an Environmental Impact
Report is not necesary.
2
Tentative Parcel Map AT 820226:1 (Tenneco)
RECOMMENDATION
Based upon the above Findings, the Planning Department recommends the
following:
A) Issuance of a Conditional Negative Declaration as follows:
1. Adequate provisions shall be made for drainage and erosion
control and protection in conjunction with site development.
2. That grading and tree removal be minimized during all phases
of site and road development.
3. That adequate and sufficient tests be performed on each lot
to ensure septic suitability at each building site .
4. That provision be made for adequate access to each building
site including provision for improvements and slope protec-
tion; and,
B) Approval of Tentative Parcel Map AT 820226 : 1 subject to the fol-
lowing conditions:
1. Private sewage disposal systems will be an acceptable method
of sewage disposal if reports, tests, and design are accept-
able. All tests, reports and designs shall conform to
methods and guidelines prescribed by the Manual of Septic
Tank Practice and other applicable City ordinances. The fol-
lowing shall appear as a Note on the Final Map:
"Appropriate soils reports including a percolation test, a
test to determine the presence of ground water , and a log of
a soil boring to a minimum depth of ten (10) feet shall be
submitted to the Atascadero Planning Department prior to the
issuance of a building permit on each lot. Where soils re-
ports indicate that conventional soil absorption systems are
not acceptable, City approval of plans for an alternative
private sewage disposal system, designed by a Registered
Civil Engineer , shall be required. Depending upon the sys-
tem, more restrictive requirements may be imposed. "
2. Water shall be obtained from the Atascader Mutual Water Com-
pany and water lines shall exist at the frontage of all par-
cels prior to filing of the Final Map.
3. Other utilities available to the area shall be extended to
the front of each parcel prior to recordation of the Final
Map. Any utility easements are to be shown on the Final Map.
4. Santa Lucia Road shall be formally offered for dedication by
the actual easement owners. A title report together with
legal descriptions for the road shall accompany the offers of
dedication prior to recordation of the Final Map.
3
0 9
Tentative Parcel Map AT 820226:1 (Tenneco)
5. Drainage and erosion control plans, prepared by a Registered
Civil Engineer , shall be submitted for review and approval by
the Planning and Public Works Departments prior to issuance
of building permits in conjunction with the installation of
private driveways or driveway easements. A Note to this ef-
fect shall be placed on the Final Map.
6 . Plan and profile drawings of proposed individual driveways
shall be submitted for approval by the Public Works and
Planning Departments in order to determine average grade and
appropriate improvement requirements at the time of building
permits. If average slope exceeds 12%, paved improvement
would be a requirement at the time of application for a
building permit. Otherwise, an all-weather surface would be
required similarly. In no event will driveways be allowed
which exceed 20% in slope. In the event any portion of the
driveway shall be shared, improvement of that shared portion
shall be a requirement made in conjunction with the first
building permit. Notes to these effects shall appear on the
Final Map.
7 . The applicant shall construct Santa Lucia Road along the
frontage of the property being the subject of this parcel
map to City standards providing as follows:
a. A 22 foot paved section along Santa Lucia.
b. Three feet of graded shoulder on each side of paving.
C. A turnaround shall be constructed at the end of Santa
Lucia Road, with the design to be approved by the City
Engineer.
8. Improvements to be constructed under an inspection agreement
and encroachment permit issued by the Public Works
Department.
a. Improvement drawings, including improvements to control
drainage and erosion within the road right-of-way,
shall be submitted to the Public Works Department for
review and approval prior to recordation of the Final
Map.
9 . The applicant shall install one fire hydrant generally at the
southwest corner of Lot 5. The size, type, manner of instal-
lation and specific location of hydrant will be as required
by the Fire Chief pending review of road improvement plans.
A letter from the Fire Chief certifying the installation of
required fire hydrant shall be submitted to the Planning De-
partment prior to recordation of the Final Map, unless de-
ferred, in which case the letter shall be submitted prior to
final inspection and acceptance of the roads.
4
Tentative Parcel Map AT 820226:1 (Tenneco)
10. With regard to improvement standards for the driveway, the
following note shall appear on the Final Map:
"Private driveways shall be improved to a minimum width of
twelve (12) feet with an unobstructed vertical clearance of
fourteen (14) feet. "
11. Effort shall be made to minimize grading that would be dis-
ruptive to the natural topography and removal of existing,
mature trees. The following shall appear as a Note on the
Final Map:
"No trees shall be removed without compliance with applicable
City ordinances. No grading shall commence without an appro-
priate permit and compliance with applicable City ordinances.
12. All pipeline and other easements of record shall be shown on
the Final Map. A letter shall be submitted from each utility
company indicating the nature and extent of any building re-
strictions. A Note so stating such restrictions shall appear
on the Final Map.
13. Roof materials for all structures shall be Class C rating or
better and a Note to that effect shall appear on the Final
Map.
14 . Improvements required by Conditions 7, 8, 9 may be deferred
for a period not to exceed three years by entering into an
agreement. Any such agreement shall include a bond, certifi-
cate of deposit or similar improvement guarantee acceptable
to the Public Works Department.
15. The applicant shall repair or reconstruct the portions of
Santa Lucia Road that have been damaged by construction traf-
fic and equipment during the construction of Santa Lucia
Road. This corrective work shall be to the satisfaction of
the Public Works Director.
16. A Final Map in compliance with all conditions set forth here-
in shall be submitted for review and approval in accordance
with the Subdivision Map Act and the City Lot Division Ordi-
nance prior to recordation.
a. Monuments shall be set at all new property corners cre-
ated and a Registered Civil Engineer or licensed land
surveyor shall submit a letter certifying that the monu-
ments have been set prior to recordation of the Final
Map.
b. A recently updated preliminary title report shall be
submitted for review in conjunction with the processing
of the Final Parcel Map.
5
1
' ��•�' .r r I � .4
r
r S 4
g• C��
NN
11 P
,
t.,e :�'h
( Q
II ^
J
ti
A1:v
,\'le7
P
A
0
Y
N
ZCNING
Ar 82oZzb:1
SANrA LUCIA ROAD
(� L.O T 1, 10 BLOCK 8 S
� I
1
01 n
S. D ;i •p -
Li
CA
04
/e4z:�
i
/; t4 = OD
-A
co
co
ri La 4P'
�, r
/// fv 1
r1\\\J 7 ! (n
JIL
CD
Ul
03
cyl
oi
ul
OD
i I �fv
! I
cr
Jai _
l lit /C,
LID !i ( r 1
r _
LOCATION - _
IJr: �� .- -�. A7- 82pZ Zoo•
SANTA Lva�A READ �-
_ _ , Lor x,2,3, �o s3�.oct�85
7 \ I, ----
M, cn i o
17. Approval of this Tentative Parcel Map shall expire two years
from the date of final approval unless an extension of time
is granted pursuant to a written reauest _prior to the exni-
e;Farr Jr Thr '
� 1979
CITY OF ATASCADERO
/ Planning Department June 7, 1982
STAFF REPORT
SUBJECT: Tentative Parcel Map AT 810908 :1
LOCATION: Palo Verde Road (Portion of Lot 7, Block 95)
APPLICANT: Rudy Ruda (Hilliard Surveys)
REQUEST: To revise certain fire protection conditions of a
previously approved tentative parcel map.
BACKGROUND
1. Existing Zoning: A-1-B-V-5
2 . General Plan: Suburban Single Family Residential
3. Environmental Determination: An initial sutdy environmental
description form has been previously completed and a Condi-
tional Negative Declaration has previously been issued along
with an Environmental Determination. Thus the proposal needs
no further environmental documentation. (Section 21166 C.E.Q.A./
Art. 6 , Section 15068 C.E.Q.A. Guidelines)
4 . Site Conditions: The site is characterized by rugged terrain
with some areas having slopes averaging 55%+. The vegetation
is primarily scrub, with a few oaks. An intermittent stream
is present on the property. The area does not seem to be a
significant agricultural resource , but may represent signi-
ficant wildlife habitat; the property is also within an area
of critical concern designated by the State as scenic back-
drop. The area is subject to a moderately high landslide
risk and an extreme fire hazard. Data from the Soil Conser-
vation Service indicates that the erosion hazard for the area
is high and that the soil may have a severe limitation for the
percolation of sewage effluent. A letter submitted from the
County Health Department in 1979 states that adequate and
potable water is available on the site based on preliminary
reviews. Access to the site is by dirt roads. The parcel
directly adjacent to the site is 228 acres, while many parcels
to the north range from 5 - 10 acres.
5 . Project Description: The applicant is proposing to subdivide
the subject 93 acres into four parcels ; Parcels A and B at
Page Two
Re: Tentative Parcel Map AT 810908: 1 (Ruda)
June 7, 1982
22 acres each. Parcel C at 24 acres and Parcel D at 25
acres. Access is proposed to each lot via an existing
private graded, dirt road off Palo Verde Road, also a
graded, dirt road.
6 . Prior Action: On November 23, 1981, the City Council
approved Tentative Parcel Map AT 810908: 1 subject to Condi-
tions 1 - 20 per the Staff Report dated November 16, 1981
as recommended by the Planning Commission. The approval
included various conditions ( #5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , and 9) to facilitate
adequate fire protection at the future residential sites.
Condition 5a stated:
"A minimum 10 , 000 gallon water storage tank for
mutal use by all parcels installed in a manner and
exact location specified by the Fire Department
prior to filing the Final Map. Necessary easements
shall be provided allowing access to the tank from
each parcel. Covenants shall be submitted for
review and approval by the Planning Director and
the restrictions of use and maintenance of such
easements and water storage facility. "
The applicant has requested that the condition be revised to
allow equivalent protection on each lot rather than a community
system as specified above (see attahced letter) .
STAFF COMMENTS
On Thursday, May 6, 1982, the Subdivision Review Board met to
review the proposed revision with the applicant, Rudy Ruda and
Robert Hilliard, the applicant' s surveyor. Also attending the
meeting were Larry Stevens, Planning Director; Larry McPherson,
Public Works Director; Mike Hicks, Fire Chief; Fred Buss, Associate
Planner; Joel Moses, Associate Planner; Patience West, Engineering
Aide; and Shirley Moore , Planning Commissioner. The following item
of concern was discussed:
1. ) Fire protection requirements
After careful review and research, including discussion with fire
officials with special expertise in wildland fire protection, the
Fire Chief now concludes that the individual 2500 gallon tanks
would provide equal or better facilities in the even of fires .
This is primarily because of concern about proper maintenance and
care of the community system.
Page Three
Re: Tentative Parcel Map AT 810908 : 1 (Ruda)
June 7, 1982
FINDINGS
1. Revision to the previously established fire protection
condition as requested will result in equivalent fire pro-
tection.
RECOMMENDATION
Based upon the above findings, the Planning Department recommends
that Condition 5a be revised to read as follows:
"A minimum 2500 gallon water storage capacity shall be
provided for each site for emergency use, separate
from the domestic water system. Improvement plans for
the individual emergency water storage systems shall be
approved by the Fire Department and Planning Department
prior to the issuance of building permits on any site.
A Note indicating such shall appear on the Final Map. "
ACTION
The Planning Commission should by motion direct Staff as deemed
appropriate.
REPORT PREPARED BY:
JOEL M SE
As+ciate Planner
REPORT APPROVED BY:
(�' ✓//J %
LAWRENCE STEVENS
Planning Director
March 19, 1982
c
.& j 'I" \" °' � .� \ �: ��fig i' ' :� }��Prti! �t�� f zw:....�..��2�,��`+����.'•'"M"
.��; i�� rl` y'f�•r - �r:�y �4!it!��i �`;�S�^i�t't�'"��i_..t,�s° t �,y��"� r:t ��li-,� ��� {��'rL"„�4 -- ~-•"�,�,,., �.�` _
.; � -;..aa � .,•, �;,, ./..?, s?���y� ?�;,j}�1�'� :� ,'!I �"1',•'J1i� �,i},a-+�`My''' rI/
% �J t
rrF,
,,,,�` ... '�-t,.,ty.-. qty"• r' t 1. 1, J1 r l t t 7.�Y� {� �z
may:• ,,�_p a., a'7V ;��..sr /YI'�I.rr J"'r r,�Fry , �t7r1 1 'f.' � ..-. Y•C':-�� v-,arF !11„11 I J�� '�`t t.,y 1./ / �f •::r
'}� f �''°"`•'f` i\i a� '„i �q ;/
}r �,',:? ti._'^:r �. t:_ (✓a ';rt 'f ^' l+”[ -,f, i/. 1
f. `
.: j�•�i �!;$ \Q� �.,.,Ifni 4�{':ilast �. R,1 n.�_.^""<�.�j !'t'%:•s • r.':�... r j_s_filt.t i l;ri 1 _.%C i, ;.;:o-, � !,'„ .t.
Yw, �., � tF. � �y \t.r-a.5�gt{�-: {� '�j� li/.r.;l.fi fr{Y t`s.� ( :r jj. `+�L' �'•.r, ,s t�' .� +7,n�r t. ;1 ��� s; �i. El'r✓: .
Y �:
�,.�\ ( ♦\\Z. i ,.V-•n� ,. / , * y, ,.� � ,�+�/ i• �'�r'T.:.
''��tt
n Kr t ,e•..,,. t Ti`., r1 ;71 f .� �i�..t':f} ice^" t e a n./f ts, '` t �,,. //f rr;
.`.��� �. ��`ltE i` 7' ley F, fig (�Ir:: ) 1 /:'tjr�+�� r�'Y / e � r� t.:/ �� 74 }v�•'+ ` ,r i �,"I, err \ k lr i�1 �,f
`>��, \ ` J`1 ,1 �� 4 i�'4:.�✓ tt r }rlr tl� 1 r / � ,'. 1/�.. x ,F � ,� � r } / �
., �y\\t 4 � r. i tt, -rr t 7! r 7 tr' -.it i f t � ✓ -i_ \' .`-,
\,yTi�j`}_.'� i '�,i-1�tj7 f,` f � ( j d, .t;;f fP i` i 5`..'rt r _� ,�:, � ,,,_,,..y,�✓ r� ,kir � xr _ �„a l ' 4 `t :��-,,.�,.'�'"o
i �� a �' i �'�'t' 1 ' S � tt�t '` btD°t�v1-'�'` + ` � �l £ , ♦n�,i`. 3 = lr) ,4,.'�.
111 �j �rg}tr N 1 � � t. A� t t ., ��♦ - ::,, /: t `, Vi I , ,�' �1 Si �. V�y'^*� -.'- � ,�., `1.
r,� ij/ �t. rCltyr o,f'.•Atascaderd
p.0'. Box
t f� s
SUBJECT: Mr; Rudy Ruda- `Pa.rcel. Map (AT80908 1) 1`�ti
Palo Verde Rd (portion of Lot ;7 Brock "95) ,
-
`�; Dear Mr„ Larry Stevens, \�
This letter is for the purpose of request1ng :an appeal pf
condition # 5 ; (a) of . the ' staff report dated November 16*'"',:1981 .,
5.. ::0ri=site ' supply faci1i.ties. for .firefighting purposes shall be
provided as follows:.
a. A minimum 10, 000`�gallon water` storage` tank for mutual use
by all parcels installed in a manner and exact location
specified by the Fire Department, prior to the, filing of_ the
Final Map. Necessary easements shall be- provided, allowin
g
access to the tank from each parcel ; ',,Covenants shall be =sub-
mitted for review and approval by' 'the .Planning `Director and
subsequently recorded with the Final Map which. set'.forth the
restrictions of use and maintenance of such easements and 'water `,
storage facility.
We make this request for the following reasons:
1 . Cost -
2 . Complexity of Covenants and Restrictions of use and maintenance
We request that each site have its own water storage tank and such
to be installed at the time of building permit .
This matter has been discussed with the mire Chief and he has
indicated approval .
If you have any questions, please call .
ZS'ncerely,
ROBERT P HILLIARD,LS 3976
LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR `V�
6125 PORTOLA ROAD,ATASCADERO,CA 93422
(805)466-1769
cam• ' V
A'
A'
h
t
r
ZOAlIA167 MA P
4T90 S-.- /
PALO 11&-,42D qo AD
Ru CA
/p
t• G t ' ,r..>h.•�? -
jv
All
!v';.r,y', -��ti^+�YZ +^ •\ N`3'r SCF 9.3. 1 ,-�;. ' .4. , ,,'/ ♦�. .
c <c:M . :c
?•\. ,•+, 1 i ; c.�- "- � ,tom �• \ \t,1 a
F n JH
(J i C
iL
�- • f' 17.
Zt
Ti r Y + r ,
i
for
TM
EF
UwTS
i rtousE !�� `G��N REp
i t GATE
.44
l44 ITSell
���`-�f C. ��;�V j,bL{CED •��y i ,``:\'` � f`j'.�V U
PRcp6fzTy)
�' � GATE ,,•� '��tDQ
�
RTY
I V�
F ` �
�K Sl6M A-r &ATE READ,5:
it FRopERTV .. . tJD I REsPASS
Ruts, GASR►cK.
J
M�ND�l FDt2T11�C�7O1�1 ��
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION June 7, 1982
FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT LA 820121: 1 (AT 82-003)
LOCATION: 8200 Casita (Lot 25 & Ptn. Lot 15A, Block 31)
APPLICANT: Jim Carpenter/Ed Anderson (Twin Cities Engineering)
On April 12, 1982 the City Council approved tentative Lot Line Ad-
justment LA820121: 1 to adjust an existing lot line to resolve a barn
encroachment, subject to certain conditions and in concurrence with
the recommendation of the Planning Commission.
The zoning is A-1-1 1/2 and the General Plan designation is Suburban
Single Family Residential. Staff review has determined that all con-
ditions of approval have been met. On June 7, 1982 the Planning Com-
mission reviewed the matter and recommended acceptance of the Final
Map.
LAWRENCE STEVEN YL. ti�ARDEN
Planning Director IRRA
ty anager
/Ps
} r x 60- g
L1V?(5'43'13"f 256.00
253.85 :-.
ti farce/
850 Ac. I Parcel A
o c = C.N 223 46.
v
- v
' o I AT 8r'^.04t'.,
,.d
/43.00
S 28°43'/9"W
s
r \_ Parcel / of AT 8/-048
n
Uj
� 3 N sin
0
;a
�v
if s6 2595
5553.10-'95.9 ' yioln/ly Map
>j CL:/38849 A
Vel7l.,
xK "a
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION June 7, 1982
FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 777
LOCATION: 5625-5655 Capistrano Avenue
APPLICANT: Kamm-McNamara
On May 18, 1981 the City Council approved tentative Tract Map 777 to
allow a 16 unit air-space condominium conversion, subject to certain
conditions and in concurrence with the recommendation of the Planning
Commission.
The zoning is R-2-B-2-D and the General Plan designation is High Den-
sity Multiple Family Residential . Staff review has determined that
all conditions of approval have been met. On June 7, 1982, the Plan-
ning Commission reviewed the matter and recommended acceptance of the
Final Map.
(IiAW_RENCE STEVENS M RRAY X. WARDEN
Planning Director City Manager
/Ps
�� �F•T 3a
oa'
op O
A� S
e �3 Np
7-i
U
- fR rn
.ir SSS
a 2 n ti PP v,�
T 0
�, Nia N
Z6U4Zi s
o W y N � w
T y d p
T oma
kh
T z
Q a° 4
cl i
o �
rjo
owk
es. tiro \, acio .
(] y i
7 Y to `
r m r LNo._
0 o q -
S'
SUBJECT: ROAD NAME CHANGE-- PUENTO ROAD
APPLICANT: Initiated by Planning Department
REQUEST: To change the name of Puento Road to Cenegal Road
On June 7, 1982 the Planning Commission reviewed the requested
road name change and unanimously recommended approval of the
change as set forthin the attached Staff Report. There was no
discussion as the matter was on the Consent Calendar.
Ltl?AWRENCE STEVENS ;1UtT,')(AY WARDEN
Planning Director Ci y Manager
/Ps
SUBJECT: ROAD NAME CHANGE - PUENTO ROAD
APPLICANT: Initiated by Planning Department
REQUEST: To change the name of Puento Road to Cenegal Road
BACKGROUND
1. Existing Zoning: A-1-B-V-5 (Light Agriculture)
2 . General Plan: Suburban Single Family Residential
3 . Project Description: It is proposed that Puento Road on which
lots 30 , 31 , and 32 of Block 57 , and Lots 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 ,
and 17 of Block 59 front be changed to Cenegal Road.
STAFF COMMENTS
The current situation involving Puento Road and Cenegal Road is
such that there is no clear intersection between the two roads .
' The Puento Road bridge at Graves Creek has not been built and
the likelihood of construction in the future seems slight. For
this reason, Puento and Cenegal appear to be one continuous road.
In addition, the potential for confusion between Puento Road and
roads with similar names (such as Puerto and Pueblo) currently
exists and will probably worsen as this area develops . By renaming
Puento Road now, while the area is vacant land, the name change can
be accomplished with the least impact on the City of Atascadero and
the property owners in the area .
To correct the situation, it appears best to simply extend Cenegal
Road the remaining distance to San Cayentano Road. Vacant lots
would be assigned correct addresses when developed. If this change
were approved, new road signs would be placed in the near future.
FINDINGS
1. The confusing nature of existing road names in the area can be
best resolved by changing the name of Puento Road to Cenegal
Road.
-RECOMMENDATION
Based upon the above Findings , the Planning Department recommends
approval of a road name change from Puento Road to Cenegal Road and
approval of address changes as shown on the attached map.
-ACTION
Direct Staff as deemed appropriate.
REPORT PREPARED BY:
MARKUM ZNY
Planning Inte fi
REPORT APPROVED BY-r
LAWRENCE STEVENS
Planning Director
/Ps
M E M O RAN D U M
�i
TO: City Manager - urray Warden
FROM: Fire Chief - Mike Hicks
SUBJECT: Weed Abatement Bid Results
After close consideration of the Weed Abatement Bid sub-
mitted by Kuhn and Scribner on June 1 , 1982 , and after a
meeting between myself and Mr. Scribner, along with an in-
spection of their equipment, I have every reason to believe
that they will be able to meet the conditions of the Contract.
It is my recommendation that the Weed Abatement Bid be
awarded to Keith Scribner and Gary Kuhn, 4460 Nogales Ave. ,
Atascadero, telephone : 466-4134 .
E
Scribner and Kuhn bid results are as follows :
Part I. Large Parcel
Tractor with operator $28 .00 per hr.
$15 . 00 per z hr.
Part II. Small Parcel
Tractor with operator $28 .00 per hr.
$15 . 00 per h hr.
Part III . Hand Work
A. Hand mower w/operator $8 . 00 per 2 hr.
B. Weed cutter w/operator $8 . 00 per ? hr.
C. Hand Labor $15 .00 per 2 hr.
Part IV. Hauling Material to Dump
Size of Vehicle: 2yd $30 . 00 per load
Attached are copies of other bids submitted.
MIKE HICKS
6-8-82
MH:pJ
a
r
W
(� U
QJ �.
C D
L �
Q. p
c
4-J
a—' rO
ZDca
_ q
- _�-
a-
r,-
o _0
(1J Q
C '-� (tel j � i, l_ �-, � -'-•� 5 �' a
CD
J
13
14� 1
rr
f
RN
r-t
i
(� C,
~
n
(D
r+ -s
C)
CD
v r-
n
CD
J-�
t, CD
Zt
CD
IN
O
77,
- -
17
d
i EQQ
rt
CD
n
o •�
r-t• -s
a ti o
CD
s r-+
0
:F
CD i
J
<
a:
u
(a) �
a
c c
a. c
CD
r
f> c
�1
C C J
CD C
a.;
°-
C 0
L .�J
Q. p
d--
4-1
d ^e�i •a i., �
c F 4' r 4 LC71 INV,
CL
1-
C�
C�r
- L
o a °'
c � ,
• c �
� o cn
FROM: Finance Director �qj
SUBJECT: Audit Agreement for Fiscal Year ending June 30, 1982
Attached is the Agreement for Auditing Services between
Robert M. Moss Accounting Corporation and the City for Fiscal
Year 1981-82. Agreement for services is for $2, 400 which in-
cludes the required Revenue Sharing Audit for the Federal Govern-
ment. This Agreement is identical to prior agreements executed
for past audits.
I recommend the City Council accept this Agreement as stated.
This recommendation is based primarily on maintaining continuity
with an auditor who is familiar with both the municipal process
and our computerized accounting system. In addition, this ac-
countancy firm has .provided excellent service not only during the
audit process, but 'throughout this year when questions arise.
RALPH H. DOWELL, JR.
RHD: ad
6-9-82
"LIU AVU61%1 11. 11VAA t1VVVVL`Ilt1P1V1 %.VArV1%ALLVLN, ouL aa5L Clain .7LreeC, JanLa
Maria, California, herein called the "AUDITOR".
PARTIES
WHEREAS, it is the intention of the CITY to provide for the examination
of its financial statements, and WHEREAS, the AUDITOR is a Certified Public
Accountant, duly authorized to practice and licensed as such by the Califonia State
Board of Accountancy and experienced in City and Special District auditing;
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, conditions and
premises hereinafter contained, the CITY hereby engaged AUDITOR, and AUDITOR
hereby agrees to examine the financial statements of all funds of the CITY.
It is understood that the services performed by the AUDITOR is in the capacity
of an independent contractor and not as an officer, agent, or employee of the
CITY.
AUDITING PROCEDURES AND SCOPE
The examination shall be made in accordance with generally accepted
auditing standards and accordingly shall include such tests of the accounting
records and such other auditing procedures as the AUDITOR considers necessary
in the circumstances in order to allow for the expression of an opinion on the
financial statements of all funds of the CITY. It is understood that such
procedures are not designed primarily to disclose defalcations or other
irregularities.
auuiiuK snail oDserve une aaequacy or the system or internal control
and if weaknesses are noted, make appropriate recommendations. AUDITOR'S
comments shall be included in a separate letter to be issued as soon as
possible after the conclusion of the examination.
PERIOD COVERED BY AGREEMENT
This agreement shall cover the audit of fiscal year beginning
July 1, 1981.
COMPLETION OF AUDIT REPORT
AUDITOR shall deliver TEN (10) copies of their report as
soon as possible after the examination has been completed.
CONSIDERATION
Said auditing services will be performed by qualified persons.
Fees for services rendered may be billed as work progresses, but not
more than once a month. Such fees shall be paid promptly by the CITY.
The total payment to the AUDITOR for services and expenses rendered
under this agreement shall be $2,400.00 for the fiscal year.
The maximum annual fee stipulated above contemplates that conditions
satisfactory to the normal progress and completion of the examination will be
encountered and that CITY accounting personnel will furnish the agreed upon
assistance in connection with the preparation of necessary detail schedules
and the production of documents for AUDITOR'S inspection. However, if
AUDITOR feels unusual circumstances are encountered which make it necessary
immediately to the responsible CITY officials, and if both parties agree
that circumstances are unusual they may negotiate such additional compensation
as appears justified.
EXTRAORDINARY SERVICES
It is contemplated that from time to time the CITY may wish AUDITOR
to perform accounting and auditing services in addition to those which are
usual and customary in making an examination of the financial statements of
the CITY. If so, AUDITOR shall be compensated for any such services performed
which are validly authorized at their normal hourly rates in effect at that
time. However, if such additional services require the expertise of
consultants, AUDITOR and CITY may negotiate separate rates and estimated fees
for the work contemplated.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have signed this agreement as of
the day and year herein first above written.
Date:
By: y:
ROBERT M. MOSS ACCOUNTANCY CORPORATION
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
/s/ Allen Grimes
ALLEN GRIDIES, City Attorney
r
Recommendation: It is recommended Council approve an agreement
with the State Department of Transportation (Caltrans) providing
for maintenance by State forces of the traffic signal systems at
El Camino Real and Traffic Way and E1 Camino Real and Curbaril.
Background: This agreement provides for routine and emergency
maintenance of the existing traffic signal systems in the City
by local Caltrans staff. On call personnel of the State are
available to respond to emergency maintenance requests at all
times.
The City has no qualified signal maintenance personnel and have
had to depend on Lee Wilson Electric from Arroyo Grande for all
of our signal maintenance needs. Although this firm has a
qualified electrical staff, they do not have the ability to
service controller components nor do they maintain a stock of
controller parts. This means that long delays are necessary
even in replacing minor signal controller and signal head
components. This very problem has been evident in long signal
shutdowns in the past.
After much discussion with local Caltrans officials, the State
has agreed to accept the responsibility to perform contract
signal maintenance service within the City. As a part of
this agreement the City must advance $1, 500 as a deposit for
services to be provided. The City will pay for all parts and
labor on a regular basis as billed.
This agreement has no effect on the current budget account for
traffic signal maintenance, however, the proposed contract
with the State should result in lower overall costs for this
activity.
Attached are the cover memo and the original and three copies
of the Cooperative Agreement between the City and State. Upon
execution by the City, the original and two copies are to be
returned to the Local Assistance Engineer in San Luis Obispo.
/ AWRENCE MCPHERSON
LM:vh
5-26-82
the STATE OF CALIFORNIA, acting by and through its Department
of Transportation, referred to herein as STATE, and
CITY OF ATASCADERO
a body politic and a
municipal corporation
of the State of
California, referred to
herein as CITY
RECITALS
1. The CITY has requested the State to maintain the
traffic control signal systems on the CITY system as shown
on Exhibit "A" , attached hereto, and by this reference made
a part hereof.
2. The STATE does have qualified personnel available to
perform said maintenance of said traffic control signal systems
within the CITY.
3. STATE and CITY will mutually benefit from this said
maintenance by providing safety to the traveling public.
4. The CITY and STATE do mutually desire to cooperate
and desire to specify herein the terms and conditions under
which said maintenance is to be performed and financed.
1. To inspect , maintain and repair, at intervals of
approximately thirty (30) days and at other times when requested
by CITY, those traffic control signal systems .at the locations
shown on Exhibit A.
2. To follow CITY' S "contingency plan" for emergency
operation of each intersection. A copy of said plan is to be
located within each controller cabinet (plan to be approved by
STATE) .
3. To provide emergency repair service upon request by
CITY, providing that STATE is not engaged in emergency work
on the STATE highway system. Said service shall return signal
system to an operable condition, accepting thereof failure or
damage to equipment that cannot be repaired on site.
4. To submit to CITY within ten (10) days after execution
of this agreement, billing in the amount of $1 ,500. 00 which
figure represents CITY'S advance deposit for the first fiscal
year' s (or portion thereof) estimated cost of services to be
provided by STATE under the terms of this agreement.
5. To accumulate said costs in a separate account and
to provide CITY with
a) A quarterly statement of costs incurred and
be computed for each month assessable labor charges are incurred
at the overhead assessment rate in effect during that month.
i
,�
.i
�.
M E M 0 R A N D
TO: Murray
FROM: Larry McPherson
SUBJECT: Acceptance of a Portion of San Marcos Road
for City Maintenance
Recommendation: It is recommended that Council approve the
attached Resolution accepting approximately 0. 37 mile of
newly constructed San Marcos Road for City maintenance.
Background: The portion of San Marcos Road as shown in
Exhibit A and as described in the Resolution was constructed
by agreement with the Public Works Department and meets all
current City Standards. All conditions of the construction
agreement were met, all tests submitted and verified, and
"as built" plans have been submitted and are approved.
It is therefore now in order to formally accept this
portion of San Marcos Road into the City street system.
This is in conformance with the Council policy of accepting
only those streets that have been constructed to current City
Standards.
P,WRENCE McPHERSON
LM:vh
6-1-82
cc:Allen Grimes
w/attachments
RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ATASCADERO ACCEPTING A PORTION OF SAN MARCOS ROAD
TNTn -TFTF rTmy cmpFFZQ-YST--
Df :so
On motion by Council Member and seconded by
Council Member , the Atascadero City Council hereby
adopts the foregoing resolution in its entirety on the following
roll call vote:
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
Adopted this day of , 1982 .
Robert J. Wilkins, Jr. ,Mayor
ATTEST:
Murray L. Warden, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
/s/ Allen Grimes
Allen Grimes, City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
AU7AY L. ARDEN, City Manager
u�
M E M O R A N D U M
4 401�j
TO: City Manager
FROM: Fire Chief
kml? �/
SUBJECT: Weed Abatement Hearing
As part of the weed abatement process, the City Council
is required to hear objections to the proposed removal of
weeds , rubbish, and other combustible material . This hear-
ing allows any affected property owners to protest the pro-
posed abatement of hazards on their property.
After hearing the objections , the City Council overrules
or allows any objection. This can be done by resolution or
motion. I recommend action by motion, i .e . "I move we
(allow - overrule) the objections to the proposed removal
of noxious or dangerous weeds on the lots posted. "
After disposing of the objections , or if no objections are
made , the Council orders the abatement of the nuisance . This
also can be done by motion or resolution. I recommend action
by motion, i.e . "I move that the Fire Chief or his authorized
representatives are ordered to abate the nuisance of noxious
or dangerous weeds on the lots posted. "
As of this date, we have not received any written protests .
MIKE HICKS
6-8-86
MH:pj
Appeal of Planning Lector ' s Determination (Deffenbaugh)
2) Change the General Plan land use designation and zone district
designation to Commercial.
3) Relocate the existing structure to a property with appropriate
zoning.
It seems clear that the first alternative would not be appropriate due
to the purpose and intent of the R zones to be residential and not
Commercial. The present ordinance under an R-4 designation would al-
low for offices, but the General Plan text has recently been revised
to eliminate this practice. As such, the future zoning ordinance in
its present form will not allow for any offices within the multi-fam-
ily districts . It must also be noted that any change in the ordinance
will also affect all other lots zoned similarly.
Alternative #2 may be a more logical method for the applicant to use
to establish a commercial use on the site. A General Plan amendment
and zone change would be needed and can be processed simulataneously,
although the last 1982 cycle for General Plan amendments is now
closed. There is some doubt about the appropriateness of such changes
in light of existing land uses and circulation patterns in the area.
The remaining alternative seems preferable and, even though the cost
of relocation may not be cheap, especially if land must also be pur-
chased, would be most consistent with applicable zoning regulations.
If the building is structurally sound, there is no reason why it can-
not be moved to an appropriately zoned piece of property. Of course,
necessary zoning and building approvals would be needed for such a
move and typical improvements (parking, landscaping, etc. ) would be
required.
The draft zoning does recognize the desirability of preserving histor-
ical structures (although this one, according to information provided
by the applicant, it not so designated) , but does not include in such
preservation the allowance of uses not permitted in the zone in which
the structure is located. The Commission has directed some review of
the "bed and breakfast" use which may fit a circumstance such as this.
Extension of that opportunity to commercial uses such as offices does
not seem particularly appropriate in light of the potentially detri- ,a
mental effects on surrounding residentia=dses-It-seems particularly
-"" difficult to allowa use simply because it occupies a historic struc-
ture while prohibiting the same use in some other type of buildng.
FINDINGS
1. Regulations in the zoning ordinance does not allow the establish-
ment of offices in the R-2 Zone and the draft zoning ordinance
in its current form does not anticipate creating such an
opportunity.
2
FF Fr- rr
Jill,I CITY OF ATASCADERO
1913
111978 I
Planning Department May 3, 1982
STAFF REPORT
SUBJECT: APPEAL OF PLANNING DIRECTOR'S DETERMINATION CONCERNING
OFFICES AS A PERMITTED USE IN THE R-2
APPLICANT: Ralph Deffenbaugh Associates
REQUEST: To allow the establishment of a commercial office within
the R-2 zone.
BACKGROUND
1. Existing Zoning: R-2
2. General Plan: Low Density Multiple Family Residential
3. Request: The applicant wishes to establish a commercial office
(food facilities consultant) in an existing residence located on
property owned by the Community Church at 5800 Rosario. The site
is presently zoned R-2 and is designated as low density Multiple
Family Residential on the General Plan. The residence was con-
structed approximately in 1918 and is known as the Case Sisters'
\ home. It does not currently possess a historical designation al-
though the applicant is investigating this possibility.
STAFF COMMENTS
Neither the present zoning ordinance nor the draft zoning ordinance
provide for such a commercial use within a residentially zoned and
designated area except that a home occupation can be allowed provided
that the business owner occupies the dwelling as a principal residence
and provided that there are no employees. The employee restriction
and other home occupation criteria are being reevaluated. However ,
since the applicant does not intend to reside in the dwelling, the
home occupation alternative is probably not a feasible alternative and
would, in any event, depend upon changes not yet made in the draft
zoning ordinance.
Other alternatives available which may accommodate the proposed use
include:
1) Change the zoning ordinance text for the R-2 district to allow
for commercial uses.
�D ralph deffenbaugh associates
FOOD FACILITIESCONSULTANTS
4760 EL VERANO POST OFFICE BOX 1778
ATA SCADERO.CALIFORNIA 93423-1778
(805) 466-6800
May 10, 1982
Lawrence Stevens
Planning Director
City of Atascadero
P.O. Box 747
Atascadero, CA 93423
Dear Mr. Stevens:
Thank you for your letter of May 7, 1982 regarding our request
for establishing an office in an R-2 zone.
In view of the feeling we received at the Planning Commission
meeting, that the members were in sympathy with our proposal
and would really have liked to approve it and in view of our
firm conviction that what we propose is really in the best in-
terests of the City, not just for our business, we would like
to carry our appeal to the City Council .
As I understand your letter, you will schedule that appeal for
US.
Thank you for the handling of this matter.
Sincerely,
Ralph fRe
nbaugh
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: CITY MANAGER June 9, 1982
FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DETERMINATION CONCERNING
OFFICES AS A PERMITTED USE IN THE R-2 ZONE
APPLICANT: Ralph Deffenbaugh Associates
REQUEST: To allow the establishment of a commercial office in the
R-2 Zone.
On May 3, 1982 the Planning Commission considered the applicant' s ap-
peal of the Planning Director ' s determination that offices were not a
permitted use in the R-2 Zone and concurred with that determination as
set forth in the attached Staff Report.
There was discussion among the Commission concerning the precedent of
allowing uses out of zone and concerning the compatibility of office
and residential uses. The various alternatives identified in the
Staff Report were also discussed.
Ralph Deffenbaugh, appellant, appeared and spoke in support of his
request giving a history of the building and his reasons for wanting
to preserve it. He also commented on the various alternatives in the
Staff Report.
No one else appeared on the matter .
On May 12, 1982 the attached letter from Mr . Deffenbaugh appealing the
Commission determination was received.
LAWRENCE STEVENS ?� *ty
WARDEN
Planning Director anager
/Ps
Appeal of Planning Director' s Determination (Deffenbaugh)
2. The "historic" structure can be preserved while still complying
with applicable regulations.
3. Allowance of office uses in residential zones is not appropriate
due to the potentially detrimental effects associated therewith
and due to the existence of sufficient commercially zoned land for
that purpose.
RECOMMENDATION
Based upon the above Findings, the Planning Department recommends
that offices not be allowed as a permitted use in the R-2 Zone and
that the draft zoning ordinance not be modified to allow offices in
residential zones.
ACTION
Direct Staff by motion as deemed appropriate. -
REPORT PREPARED/APPROVED
LAWRENCE STEVENS
Planning Director i4
/Ps
3
�D ralph deffenbaugh associates
RECEIVED . 3 + �2 s
. "
FOOD FACILITIES CONSULTANTS �
4760 EL VERANO POST OFFICE BOX 1778 "
ATASCADERO.CALIFORNIA 93423-1778
(805) 466-6800
April 10, 1982
Mr. Lawrence Stevens
Planning Director
City of Atascadero
Administration Building
6500 Palma Avenue
Atascadero, California 93422
Dear Mr. Stevens:
Thank you for taking time to meet with me last Friday when we
discussed the possibility of my using the 5800 Rosario house
as an office.
As you pointed out, there is no provision in the existing code
for preserving historical buildings in noncompliance areas.
As you recommended, we would like to meet with the Planning
Commission to further pursue the use of this building, as well
as the use of other historical buildings in Atascadero.
Please confirm the May 3rd date for us to meet.
Sincerely,
Ralph fDe fenbaugh
RD:rd
i
P
PROPOSAL AND REQUEST
FOR
ZONE CHANGE
BACKGROUND
The Community Church of Atascadero is the owner of property fronting
on Palma Avenue, Rosario Avenue and Olmeda Avenue, on which is located a
number of structures in addition to the church sanctuary. All of the struc-
tures are used by the church for its various functions except one which is
in a deteriorated state and unfit for any use in its present condition.
The structure was designed as a single family residence and used as
such until deterioration made it uninhabitable. The church considered var-
ious alternatives for use or disposal of the structure and came to some basic
conclusions regarding it:
1. Restoration or remodeling costs were prohibitive for any possible
church use at this time.
2. The church had no need for the structure as is , or as it would most
reasonably be restored, and did not anticipate any need for it in
the foreseeable future.
These conclusions lead to studies to determine a logical disposition
of the structure, since it is an eyesore to the community and an attractive
nuisance, with resultant potential liability, in its current dilapidated
condition.
One study considered severing that portion of church property on which
the structure sets and offering the property for sale. Such severance would
require a lot split, producing an undersize lot, and this possibility had to
be ruled out for that reason. Also the congregation of the church voted
against disposing of any part of the land it holds, in anticipation of future
church expansion.
With no apparent alternative other than having the structure razed, it
was offered for sale to be removed from the property. It was advertised for
sale for several weeks, requesting sealed bids.
Only one bid was received and the provisions of that bid included leas-
ing the ground on which it is located until such time as the church has need
for that ground area. The bid was accepted, the structure sold and the ground
area leased.
The structure, which bears an address of 5800 Rosario, is one of the
original colony homes, having been constructed in the latter part of the
second decade of this century (approximately 1918) as the home of the Case
Sisters. It appears likely that the structure qualifies as a certified
historic structure and the present owners are investigating the possibility
of applying for such certification.
PRESENT STATUS
Ralph and Ruth Deffenbaugh, husband and wife, local residents and busi-
ness people since 1977, are the present owners and are developing a plan for
preservation and restoration of this historic structure in its present loca-
tion in a way that will :
1. Preserve its unique architectural qualities.
2. Convert it back to a neighborhood asset.
3. Be compatible with other uses of property on church grounds.
4. Justify the costs of restoration and development.
PROPOSAL
The present owners propose to restore and remodel the structure to house
the offices of their companion food facility firms. In so doing, they plan
to preserve and restore as much of the original beauty of the structure as
possible, while limiting the remodel to the interior and only such exterior
necessities as may be required for adequate working access. They expect to
re-develop and re-landscape the leased area immediately adjacent to the struc-
ture to make it functional and attractive and maintain the entire property in
such a manner as to enhance the beauty of the community.
This proposed use will allow the preservation of a historic structure
which would be otherwise doomed to destruction and be replaced by a vacant
lot for many years to come. It will make restoration economically feasible,
while restoration as a single family residence would not be economically
feasible. It will be compatible with the neighborhood which has long since
departed from being a single family neighborhood.
Conversion to offices would also be compatible with uses the' church
might have for it, if it should need to re-acquire it.
firm specializing in the design of heavy duty commercial kitchens.
R & R Restaurant Equipment Sales is the companion firm which procures,
supplies and installs commercial food facility equipment.
These businesses, owned and operated by the Deffenbaughs, are conducted
in offices with heavy use of telephones and an extensive catalogue library
for the manufacturers they represent.
Customers and Clients are located throughout the country with very few in
the immediate vicinity of Atascadero. There is no inventory of equipment
carried in stock as the equipment is either drop shipped direct to the customer
or brought to the jobsite by an installer. Clients and customers rarely visit
the office, but rather the Consultant, Mr. Deffenbaugh, visits the Clients.
NEIGHBORHOOD IMPACT
The impact of the proposed use of the structure on the neighborhood would
be comparable to the former use as a single family residence. The impact would
be substantially less than having a four family dwelling on the property as is
allowed in the present zoning.
The proposed office use does not involve extensive visitor traffic. It
does not produce noise. In fact, there would be nothing audible or visible
which could be objectionable.
The noise and traffic impact on the neighborhood would be greatly less
than is currently produced by apartment dwellers in the surrounding area.
There is therefore no negative impact in the proposed use and the positive
impact of a well kept, improved property as compared to the present status, or
as a vacant, unused lot, is considerable.
NEIGHBORHOOD SUPPORT
A canvas of immediate neighbors to the property reveals no objection to
the proposal . In fact, those canvassed welcome and applaud the proposal .
They would much prefer to see the building saved, utilized and beautified
than to have it removed.
The congregation of the church approved the bid proposal for sale of the
structure with full knowledge of its proposed use without a dissenting vote.
JJ i v
i
r
ko
o
y # :��
t7 ti` ry f
a ` .
+11 tryrl
T.af -
hl
vc
co
cq
�
zC \WD
ID ., w,e•.��r_ \;1 A \ 1. ` 1 fir") N `
r
It �� o
7e 19 "� 11 HI SIN
E aIM
�T A u IQ' p 1 1 of
TRAFFIC
C C ; ,-
T0: City Council _M_E_M_O_R,A_N_D_U_M_
FROM: City Manager
SUBJECT: Halliday Appeal
Attached is the information pertaining to the Halliday appeal
which was on the agenda at the last Council meeting and at which
you directed Staff to get together with the Hallidays to see if
the the issue could be resolved.
Mr . McPherson' s letter to Mr. Halliday, dated May 26th, indi-
cates the action he has taken following the Council meeting.
Since the time indicated in his letter , no further contact has
been made with Mr . Halliday nor has Mr . Halliday provided the
City Engineer with the necessary information.
Accordingly, the issue is still in the air and, insofar as we
know, the facts as presented to you at your May 24th meeting and
as presented by the attached memo have not changed.
R L. WARDEN
MLW:ad
6-10-82
•
ROLFE NELSON POLICE DEPARTMENT
(805) 466.8600
MURRAY L.WARDEN
ADMINISTRATION BUILDING
1
CITY MANAGER/CLERK POST OFFICE BOX 747
ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA 93423 FIRE DEPARTMENT
- .
PHONE (805) 466-8000 6005 LEWIS AVENUEATASCADERO, CA 93422
(805) 466.2141
May 26, 1982
i
Mr. Edward Halliday
8250 San Clemente
Atascadero, CA 93422
Dear Mr. Halliday;
This letter is in follow up to my meeting with
you and your brother in my office on Tuesday, May
25, 1982 .
In this meeting I gave you a copy of the drainage
area and pipe sizing calculations performed for the
City by Twin Cities Engineering for your information
and to assist you in resolving your objections to this •
office' s findings in reviewing your grading plans.
As I understand it, your primary objections re-
late to the method and conclusions reached in calculating
the design flow rate and the culvert size at the drive-
way configuration shown on your grading plans . I
attempted to explain the criterion used in such an
evaluation and to also explain that a variety of drainage
solutions were available other than that proposed on
your plan. The available alternatives included: a
grade level crossing, a small diameter pipe with an
overflow weir, higher fill over the pipe to allow an
increase in head, various headwall considerations, or
various combinations of these methods.
You also protested the fact that you were required
to supply the design information for sizing the culvert
under the driveway and stated you felt that City staff
should have supplied this information. I explained
that it is the property developer ' s responsibility to
supply all plans and technical information and that
our efforts to make drainage calculations were only to
verify the results of the information you presented
from the Soil Conservation Service as support of your
plans. I would emphasize that there was never an effort
made by myself or my staff to discourage a solution or
a reluctance to review various alternatives available to
you for your site development.
ay, Monday, May 24 , 1982 , buto tnis date no turtner
contact has been made with my office to discuss this item.
To this date you have not supplied this office with
drainage calculations or culvert sizing calculations by a
technically qualified firm or individual, the results of
which are verifible by acceptable engineering practices.
This leaves me no choice but to advise you that I cannot
recommend approval of your grading plan as submitted to the
Building Department until such time as you provide pro-
perly performed and documented drainage and culvert sizing
calculations to this office.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to
call.
Sincerely
AWRENCE McPHERSON
Director of Public Works
LM:vh
cc: Murray Warden
Lawrence Stevens
Central Coast Eng.
SUBJECT: Hearing on Halliday appeal
The Halliday appeal addresses specific issues; that of the
proper calculations for a proposed driveway culvert and deletion
of the requirement for sandbagging. Although these issues are
normally not appealable because they are resolved through appli-
cation of standard engineering practices, they are being referred
to you in order to avoid any apperance of denying an applicant
his or her right to be heard. In doing so, however , it is sug-
gested that you follow a process which in essence is as follows:
The Staff report should be reviewed and Staff information
presented to the Council. In the present case, that information
will constitute testimony from the Planning Director , the Public
Works Director and Mr . John Kennaly of Twin Cities Engineering.
Council should, if it wishes, address questions to each of the
parties providing testimony. Upon completion of the Staff pre-
sentation, Mr . Halliday should be allowed to present any evidence
and witnesses he may care to produce to support his view. Again,
questions by the Council should be addressed to any aspect of the
applicant' s information. If the Council wishes, they could then
ask for a summary of each position after receipt of all direct
testimony.
After Council has completed its considerations and discus-
sion, it should establish definite findings and conclusions.
Those findings and conclusions could be in the form suggested by
staff or as suggested by Mr . Halliday or a modification of these.
If, however , the Council is not prepared to make such findings
and determinations at this meeting , then the matter could be con-
tinued to a later date with a request that written findings be
provided to Council for adoption at a subsequent meeting. This
would require Council to give general guidelines as to what their
findings and conclusions should be. (Incidently, if additional
witnesses or testimony are required, the matter can be continued
to another date. )
Although our Code sections do not specifically address the
time period in which the Council must render its judgment, an
omission which perhaps we should correct, you should attempt to
resolve the issue as expeditiously as possible assuming you are
satisfied that you have heard all pertinent information.
i
M RRAY 7. WARDEN
MLW:ad
5-20-82
LOCATION: 7900 San Clemente (Lot 12, Block YB)
APPLICANT: Edward Halliday
REQUEST: To allow use of a formula other than the rational method
to calculate drainage for a proposed driveway culvert and
to delete the requirement for sandbagging at each end of
the culvert.
BACKGROUND
1. Applicable Engineering Standards: Section 11-351.1500 (P. 17-32)
of the San Luis Obispo County Standard Improvement Specifications
and Drawings establishes the standards used by the City of Atas-
cadero for storm drainage. These standards are administered by
,--� the Public Works Department. Section 11-351.1504 (P. 19) indi-
cates that:
" . . . . solution of hydraulic design problems commonly encountered
for areas not to exceed 200 acres may be made by the rational
formula. . . . "
The standards (P. 16) also provide that:
"While it is intended to permit alternative methods of analysis
and solution of drainage problems and to provide for other methods
for those situations which do not lend themselves to solution by
the following criteria, such alternative methods shall be based
upon accepted engineering principles and shall produce results
which achieve the products intended by the following
specifications ."
The recommendation for slope protection (i .e. rip-rap, sandbag-
ging, etc. ) is based upon the velocity and amount of drainage flow
and is intended to provide erosion control around the culvert
inlet and outlet and minimize hydraulic pressure which could dis-
lodge the culvert.
2. Site Considerations: The subject property is approximately 17,000
square feet in size and is located in a single family residential
area of similarly sized parcels. The site slopes upward from San
Clemente at an approximate slope of 15% and is traversed by a
natural watercourse across its frontage near the roadway. The
watercourse continues along and across San Clemente to San Marcos
towards Atascadero Creek. (See attached map)
4 . The application of City standards to this project did not involve
the use of administrative discretion or personal judgment.
3
April 2, 1982
Planning Department
Cit. o-" .?tasc`dero
t=cc=cero,TC.A 9322
Attn: lairs Larry Jtewns
t.r. Stevens:
In a letter from your office dated 1 arch 3, 1982, it was
�.- - st ate-d that p enctration of a. one hour fire w_ll by 2 x 6 Gooden
1:,'cams (as S 0.71 in plans :ub^i tted to your Office for ap roval),
di% not :sect safety reauirements for th.e pro-Dozed type of con-
straction. .1-,-,::t sa:ie letter gave five references n mi:,� _eco-Ole
your of-_i cc t.ile�edly c0rt%actl- -ith reEard to this ,:,vttC aI
cunt -ci than ?;ith rs'�;a_ra to th=-t mS.tter. I too!', the liberty of
cont'Lct in,';, by phone:, �. five OL t}.iL - iC—LsivF.:.� y -.
11ou cited and
rc_:� the- the pert^. of Your icttcr t'r_at ��urportc to :cote te-i•
as fol_.o::s:
1. Barney 11d.Ka y - "she -vordiny; of your letter constit: tes
a miscuote."
2. Jac`-: :e11er-2Kn - " %ncti ti or: i^ accontble if the l:ood-
"r inv ;ieb e sro not -rovide suptsort
1 for the one hour -fire
(they do not in uhis case)
3. �en_n_s _'cCret ry — tame- au 1=r. :Celle» n
4. . ranh Kellcrzan - Stated that he `id not lake the 4" dL-on-
sion limitation refcrrud to in{ your le ttcr.
5. .-.-llama"t 'ir��-iC :�.7:� — Jtatsd hr [.z rc-v'_i co_'1 tflotri:_ i.! r
L'
office concerr:- 7 t^2 apt:.r,
T,L:,=c .ppa. rs to be a serious disagxrecm_nt what you
clei-: to h---ve been tole by t11c_-.c :eo_.le and ;:'hat "they" cl E.i;, to
.-i=co nc 3.. t er not t@ila:E i'_^_C Tr .th ar __ OC3'_vy
at th2 ver- c'a3t inaccUratc. '.ith thiC in ..1ne. l
,:ouid 1_.__ to h__ve thi.: letter stLndas a re:_:uest for _,eal in
the Llai t ter referred to above. I ...:.v4 zcnt a rc:c_ueSt fo= tE:,tint -
fO-r onc-, fire wall uuffficie-_ncy of thc pro-;;oc_ed conStraction - to
Ccnit_Ll Tgib: it _:ice: Lags Ob_ T,o. i h vc not o< yet, re-
CiC.�Tir_ reYlI,- O tach, c•inc� yo-a_- 1Gtter £t�'ti no dB.`.G�it�E
e'v
_of 1 in t._:ic � Or _.ay be- c t
T
,i L in s.8- of Oi::c'_' .etc.:'.. dci-rilinc-L isc' c- 1;.:�0:fJG by yo-,r
o_lice, 1 foal it is i [ '__tiVG t r _':� t o :l t t i ti:je i
^c_ to de1 y , •-111, of .. :i3 __;e yl :i'_,L=? I can obtain_ the teet
0.>�:J `.nG
Th---nI: ;,ro i� ttcntzon.
Res_pectf`-11y . ub:-:ittcc,
i_�Z1i cry
12.250 .n Cl cme_.tc
y_ sc-,; e_o, - 93422
46G-3341 •
M E M O RAN D U M
TO: City Council
FROM: City Manager
SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 56 , Health and Sanitation
The attached Health and Sanitation Ordinance is introduced as
a first reading and is subject, of course, to - ur suggestions,
questions, or proposed amp- -' �;/� iinous ordinance
Y I (oU
with the major purpc (P40 • ✓ t to get the
process started. T1 l �I y be scheduled
for the next Council :t to amend-
ment or postponement 1 1 reading.
Those aspects deali____,, e Health Officer reflect the
standard provisions for all cities in the County in order to min-
imize differing requirements when using the County Health Officer
as the City Health Officer . The solid waste management portion
and subsequent portions are basically revisions to existing
adopted ordinances with changes designed to convert to City use. -►
Recommend approval of first reading.
i�96YT� _
MU Y WARDEN
MLW:ad
6-10-82
'�
>�
s.«-
`,'ti
0
• M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Murray
FROM: Larry McPherson
SUBJECT: Cable T.V. Franchise Transfer
Recommendation: It is recommended that the attached Resolution
to transfer the CATV franchise from Falcon Cable Corporation
to Falcon Cable TV of Northern California be approved.
Background: The attached letter from Mr. Hatchell, General
Manager of Falcon Cable Corporation explains the request
for transfer of the CATV franchise. The approval of the Re-
solution would not effect the term or content of the existing
` •` franchise with Falcon.
A14RENCE McPHERSON
LM:vh
5-21-82
cc: City Atty
w/att.
eba *d
�IoTE ApPaov� s�fvu� � 3� /''fi4QF
su d Jrc7 O
T
/tecrpTAwer -
5nrrC0
m: sowrt�� N.
•
RESOLUTION NO. 26-82
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO
•
APPROVING THE TRANSFER OF THE COMMUNITY ANTENNA
TELEVISION FRANCHISE FROM FALCON CABLE CORPORATION
TO FALCON CABLE TV OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
WHEREAS , the City of Atascadero has granted a community antenna
television system ("CATV" ) to Falcon Cable Corporation, a California
Corporation; and
WHEREAS , Falcon Cable Corporation has been providing CATV services
to the City of Atascadero under the name Falcon Cable TV; . and
WHEREAS , the stock of Falcon Cable Corporation is owned 100% by
Falcon Cable TV of Northern California, a general partnership consist-
ing of Falpro Corporation (40%) , Advance Corporation (40%) , and Black-
hawk Communications Corporation (20%) ; and
WHEREAS , a communication has been received from Falcon Cable Cor-
poration indicating its desire to transfer the existing CATV franchise
from Falcon Cable Corporation to Falcon Cable TV of Northern Califor-
nia; and
WHEREAS , this transfer will accommodate certain accounting consid-
erations and will enable the partners of Falcon Cable TV of Northern
California to consolidate all of its current franchises in a single S
entity of greater financial strength; and i
WHEREAS , the general partners making up Falcon Cable TV of North-
ern California will be the same general partners which owned 100% of
the stock of Falcon Cable Corporation, and their interest in the
assets of Falcon Cable Corporation will be identical to their interest
in the ownership of Falcon Cable TV of Northern California; and
WHEREAS , the managing partner of Falcon Cable Corporation will
continue as the managing partner of Falcon Cable TV of Northern Cali-
fornia, and there will be no change in the management personnel or
policies; and
WHEREAS , effectively Falcon Cable Corporaiton is merely changing
the name of the franchise; and
WHEREAS , Section 6.48 .070 of the Municipal Code requires the prior
consent and approval of the City Council to this intended transfer .
NOW, THEREFORE, the Atascadero City Council does hereby find, de-
termine and declare as follows:
1. The City Council does hereby consent to the transfer of the
CATV franchise from Falcon Cable Corporation to Falcon Cable
TV of Northern California; and •
Resolution No. 26-80 Falcon Cable TV
2. That this transfer will be effective when the City is in re-
ceipt of a written instrument executed by Falcon Cable TV of
Northern California agreeing to comply with the provisions of
the Municipal Code and existing franchise agreements.
a
On motion by Councilman and seconded by Councilman
the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety
on the following vote:
AYES :
NOES:
ABSENT:
ROBERT J. WILKINS, JR. , Mayor
ATTEST:
MURRAY L. WARDEN, City Clerk
• APROVED AS TO FORM:
ALLEN GRIMES , City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
M&RAY City Man er
•
2
Resolution No. 26-8f- Falcon Cable TV
This resolution shall not become effective unless and until Falcon
Cable TV of Northern California agrees to comply with all of the pro- •
visions of Chapter 6.48 of the Atascadero Municipal Code.
Dated: FALCON CABLE TV OF NORTHERN
CALIFORNIA, a partnership
By:
BLACKHAWK COMMUNICATIONS CORP.
By:
ADVANCE CORPORATION
By:
FALPRO CORPORATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA •
COUNTY OF
On before me, the undersigned, a Notary
Public in and for said State, personally appeared
known to
me to be the person whose names
subscribed to the
within instrument and acknowledged
that executed the same.
WITNESS my had and official seal.
Signature
•
3