The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda Packet 07/12/1982 • AGENDA - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting July 12, 1982 7: 30 p.m. Atascadero Administration Building Call to Order Pledge of Allegiance Invocation Roll Call Public Comment A. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Item A, Consent Calendar , are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion in the form listed below. There will be no separate discussion of these items. If dis- cussion is required, that item will be removed from the Consent Calen- dar and will be considered separately. Vote may be by roll call. 1. Minutes of the special meeting of June 12, 1982 (RECOMMEND APPROVAL) • 2. Minutes of the regular meeting of June 28, 1982 (RECOMMEND APPROVAL) 3. Minutes of the adjourned regular meeting of June 29, 1982 (RECOMMEND APPROVAL) 4. Treasurer 's Report, 6-1-82 to 6-30-82 (RECOMMEND APPROVAL) 5. Finance Director' s Report, 6-1-82 to 6-30-82 (RECOMMEND AP- PROVAL) 6. Resolution No. 35-82 amending Resolution No. 12-79 authoriz- ing investment in Local Agency Investment Fund (RECOMMEND ADOPTION) 7. Amendment of claim for Local Transportation Funds (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT) 8. Tentative Parcel Map AT 820505: 1, 5905-5975 E1 Camino Real, Clarance Radke (Stewart) , to divide 0.31 acres of developed commercial property into two parcels (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) 9. Tentative Parcel Map AT 820513:1, 7326 Santa Ysabel, Gaylen Little and Don Rauch, to allow six apartment units approved by Departmental Review R820309 :1 to be air-space condominiums (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) � a AGENDA - ATASCADERO i CITY COUNCIL - JULY 12, 1982 _ 10. Tentative Parcel _Map-AT 820426:1, 5555 Traffic Way, -Foxfire, Ltd. (Hoenstein) , to allow creation of 21 residential unit as air-space condominiums (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNIN COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) 11. Lot Line Adjustment LA810320 :1, `5560 Nogales, Kendall Gallan- ger (Hilliard) , to extend the time allowed to complete re- quirements for an approved ' lot line adjustment (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) 12. Departmental Review R820426:1, 5555 Traffic Way, Foxfire, Ltd. (Hoenstein) , to construct 21 multiple family residen- tial units (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOM- MENDATION) B. HEARINGS, APPEARANCES AND REPORTS 1. Public hearing on General Plan Amendment GP820330:1, 3555 El Camino Real, Wallace Dunn, to change the GeneralPlan land use designation from Suburban Single Family Residential to High Density Multiple; Family Residential and to change the zoning from A-1 to R-4 2. Report regarding 3-F Meadows petition for street maintenance 3. Recreation Department Quarterly Report C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Resolution No. 31-82 approving amendment to the General Plan Land Use Map along the south side of Morro Road between Pismo Avenue and Santa Rosa Road including approval of General Plan Amendment GP8203311 (Klowgard) 2. Resolution No. 32-82 approving amendment to the General Plan Land Use map within the Montecito - El Camino Real Study Area, including approval of General Plan Amendment GP820204:1 (Maxwell, Eddy, Hixson) 3. Resolution No. 33-82 approving General Plan Amendment GP820419:1 (Planning' Commission) amending the text of the Lane Use Element of the General Plan eliminating specific standards for the keeping of animals 4. Resolution No. 34-82 denying General Plan Amendment GP820330:1 concerning a change in land use designation from Suburban Single Family Residential to High Density Multiple i FamilyResidential 5. Ordinance No. 56, Health and Sanitation - second reading and adoption 2 0 0 AGENDA - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL - JULY 12, 1982 D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Request of the City of Seal Beach for consideration of adopt- ing a resolution reqesting the State to fund certain por- tions of the costs of the 911 Emergency Telephone system E. ATASCADERO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT BUSINESS 1. Appointment of Allen Grimes as Attorney for the Sanitation District Board 2. Appointment of Mayor as President of the Sanitation District Board F. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION 1. City Council 2. City Attorney 3. City Manager NOTE: The City Council will hold a closed session after the regular meeting to discuss employee negotiations. 3 MINUTES - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL Special Meeting June 12, 1982 9:00 a.m. Atascadero Administration Building The meeting was called to order at 9:`00 a.m. by Mayor Wilkins. PRESENT: Councilmen Highland, Mackey, Stover and Mayor Wilkins ABSENT: Councilman Nelson It was noted that the meeting had been called for the purpose of reviewing the 1982-83 proposed budget. Mr. Warden reviewed the budget that had been put together because of the uncertainties regarding the State budget. Staff had prepared three different types; "A" , best case; "B" , Governor' s budget; and "C" , worst case. Councilmembers reviewed the budget with questions being answered by Mr . Warden. Mayor Wilkins declared the revenue sharing hearing open to the public. Various , organizations presented :their ; funding requests to Council. As there were no further comments, the hearing was. closed. Coun- cil adjourned at 12:00 p.m. Recorded by: MURRAY L. WARDEN, City Clerk /U, MINUTES - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting June 28, 1982 7: 30 p.m. Atascadero City Council The meeting was called to order at 7: 30 p.m. - by Mayor Wilkins with the Pledge of Allegiance. Reverend Russ Cahhal of the Church of Christ gave the invocation. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Councilmen Mackey, Nelson, Stover and Mayor Wilkins ABSENT: Councilman Highland CERTIFICATION OF ELECTION RESULTS BY PRESENT COUNCIL 1. Resolution No. 27-82 reciting the fact of the General Munici- pal Election held in Atascadero on June 8, 1982, declaring the result thereof and such other matters as provided by. law Mr. Warden stated that the resolution had some blanks which needed to be filled in. In Section 1, "11 should be inserted in the first blank and 113511 in the second blank. In Section 3, "4849" should be inserted in the first blank, 1134111 in the second blank, and 115190 in the third blank. He stated that Council was in receipt of the certi- fied canvass from the County which is a part of the resolution. A copy of the canvass is also made a para of these minutes for the rec- ord. MOTION: Councilman Stover moved that Resolution No. 27-82 be read by title only. The motion was seconded by Councilman Mackey and unanimously carried. Mayor Wilkins read Resolution No. 27-82 by title only. MOTION: Councilman Nelson moved for the adoption of Resolution No. 27-82. The motion was seconded by Councilman Mackey and unanimously carried by roll call vote. 2. Presentation of Certificates of Election to City Council, City Clerk and City Treasurer Mr . Warden presented Certificates of Election toCityCouncilmem bers Marge Mackey, George Molina, Rolfe Nelson, Bill Stover and Bob Wilkins; City Clerk Barbara Norris; and City Treasurer Steve Rizzuto. 3. Oath of Office administered to new City Council, City Clerk and City Treasurer Mr. Warden administered the Oath of Office to the newly elected officials. MINUTES - ATASCADEROCITY COUNCIL - JUNE 28, 19�2 � ELECTION OF OFFICERS FOR NEW COUNCIL 4. Election of Mayor City Clerk Barbara Norris opened nominations for Mayor . Council- man Mackey nominated Councilman Nelson for Mayor for a term of one year . Councilman Molina seconded the nomination. As there were no further nominations for Mayor, the nominations were closed. Council- man Nelson was elected Mayor on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Mackey, Molina and Nelson NOES: Councilmen Stover and Wilkins 5. Election of Mayor Pro Tem Mayor Nelson opened nominations for Mayor Pro Tem. Councilman Molina nominated Councilman Mackey as Mayor Pro Tem. The nomination was seconded; by Councilman Stover . As therewereno further nomina- tions, the nominations were closed and Councilman Mackey was elected Mayor Pro Tem unanimously by roll call vote. REGULAR BUSINESS Public Comment (1) Howard Marohn stated that he was pleased that the Counci listened to the voters and provided new leadership for th community. A. CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Minutes of the regular meeting of June 28, 1982 (RECOMMEND APPROVAL) 2. Resolution No. 28-82 opposing the State of California' s "Re- verse Bailout" budget proposals (RECOMMEND ADOPTION) 3. Resolution No. 29-82 opposing construction or establishment of any new correctional institutions and the expansion ,of existing correctional facilities within the County of San Luis Obispo at Camp Roberts (RECOMMEND ADOPTION) 4. Agreement with the State of California, Caltrans, for main- tenance of State highways in the City of Atascadero (RECOM- MEND APPROVAL) 5. Tentative Parcel Map AT 820108:1, 9365 E1 Bordo, Don Jensen (Stewart) to allow resubdivision of six parcels into four lots (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDA- TION) 2 0 0 MINUTES - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL - JUNE 28, 1982 6 . Tentative Parcel Map AT 820401:1, 10320 Atascadero Avenue, Barry and Sandra Clarke (Morgan) to allow the division of 5.30 acres into two parcels (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) .P 7. Tentative Parcel Map AT 810305:1, Palo Verde Road, William Fortington, to extend the time allowed to complete require- ments for the approved tentative map (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) 8. Appeal of conditions of Departmental Review R820407:1, 8842 Palomar, Jerry Noble, to establish a lumber storage/retail sales yard (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOM- MENDATION) Mayor Nelson reviewed the items on the Consent Calendar . Council- man Mackey offered a correction to the minutes. She stated on page 6, item F-1 (a) , she had said that the parking signs were "limited park- ing" as opposed to "no parking" . MOTION: Councilman Wilkins moved for the approval of` the Consent Calendar with the correction to the minutes. The motion was seconded by Councilman Mackey and unanimously carried. B. HEARINGS, APPEARANCES AND REPORTS 1. Public hearing on General Plan Amendment GP 820331: 3, Morro Road between Pismo and Santa Rosa, Norman P. Klowgard with expanded area initiated by Planning Commission, to change General Plan land use designation from High Density Single Family Residential to Recreation Larry Stevens reviewed this General Plan Amendment for Council and stated that the Planning Commission approved the request. Mayor Nel- son opened the matter for public hearing; as there were no comments, the hearing was closed. MOTION: Councilman Mackey moved for the approval of the Planning Com- mission recommendation. The motion was seconded by Council- man Stover and unanimously carried. 2. Public hearing on General Plan Amendments GP 820204:1 and GP 820325: 1 (E1 Camino Real-Montecito Study Area) ; area bounded by El Bordo Avenue, E1 Camino Real, Montecito Avenue and Las Lomas Avenue, including lots on the northeasterly side of Las Lomas; Maxwell, Eddy, Hixson, Pflum, Lilley & O'Farrell, Williams House of Carpets, Forsman and Ward; ex- panded area initiated by Planning Commission; to consider certain General Plan map amendments for Retail Commercial and Low Density Multiple Family Residential in the Study Area Larry Stevens reviewed this matter stating that the Planning Com- mission had approved GP820204: 1, the El Camino Real portion of the study, applicants Maxwell, Eddy, and Hixson; and denied GP820325: 1, 3 MINUTES - ATASCADEROCITY COUNCIL - JUNE 28 1982 the Las Lomas portion of the study, applicants Pflum, Lilley & O'Farrell, Williams House of Carpets, Forsman and Ward. 0 Mayor Nelson opened the matter for public hearing. Comments were heard from Don Eddy, _.tonna Kori , Robert Forsman, and Bob Lilley in support of their applications. As there were no further comments, the hearing was closed to the public. Councilman Stover stated that he would abstain from discussion and voting in this matter as he is a property owner in the area. Council- members discussed this matter with Councilman Wilkins suggesting that Council approve GP820204:1, the El Camino Real portion of the study; and refer the GP820325: 1, the Las Lomas portion of the study, back to the Planning Commission for consideration during their next General Plan amendment cycle. MOTION: Councilman Wilkins moved for approval of GP820204: 1 and refer GP820325:1 back to the Planning Commission for consideration in their next General Plan cycle. The motion was seconded by Councilman Mackey and carried with Councilman Stover abstain- ing. 3. Public hearing on General Plan Amendment GP 820419:1, initi- ated by the Planning Commission, to consider text amendments to the Land Use Element which would eliminate specific standards for the keeping of animals and replace them with general policy statements 0 Mr . Stevens reviewed this matter stating that the Planning Commis- sion had approved the text amendment to the Land Use Element which specified that standards will be established in the zoning ordinance. Mayor Nelson opened the hearing for public comment; as there were no comments, the hearing was closed. MOTION: Councilman Wilkins moved for the adoption of the Planning Commission recommendation. The motion was seconded by Coun- cilman Stover and unanimously carried. 4. Appeal of private sewage disposal system requirements, 7900 San Clemente, Edward Halliday, to determine that an existing watercourse is not a stream necessitating a 50 foot distance separation between it and a proposed private sewage disposal system Larry Stevens reviewed this matter for Council . He stated that the information presented should be limited to that given to the Ap- peals Board. If any new information is presented, the matter should be returned to the Appeals Board for a recommendation on the new in- formation. If the Council decides to overturn the determination of the Appeals Board, they should make findings of fact. The main dis- agreement is whether or not the watercourse on Mr . Halliday' s property is a stream. Staff had determined that it qualified as a stream. i4 order to assure reasonable operating conditions for the private sewage P 9 disposal system. The Board of Appeals supported Staff' s recommenda- 4 MINUTES - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL - JUNE 28, 1982 tion. Councilmembers asked several questions of Terry Orton from Twin Cities Engineering. Dave and Ed Halliday made presentations supporting their conten- tion that the watercourse is not a stream. Mr . Dave Halliday objected to the requirement that no new information be presented and stated - that 90% of Mr . Stevens' presentation was new information and they should be granted the same consideration. Mr . Dave Halliday also stated that no parameters were cited by the City as to what consti- tutes a stream; he gave several definitions from various State agen- cies. There was considerable discussion on this matter with Allen Grimes reminding Council that it is the appellant's responsibility to prove that there was not enough evidence to support the Appeals Board' s finding; they were to show where the Appeals Board made an error in their determination. MOTION: Councilman Wilkins moved that the appeal be denied. The motion was seconded by Councilman Stover and carried on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Mackey, Stover and Wilkins NOES: Councilman Molina and Mayor Nelson RECESS 9: 30 p.m. RECONVENED 9: 35 p.m. 5. City Attorney Report No. 20 Mr . Grimes reveiwed his report for Council. C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Halliday appeal of drainage requirements, 7900 San Clemente, to allow use of a formula other than the rational method to calculate drainage for a proposed driveway culvert at each end of the culvert - continued Larry McPherson reviewed the background of this matter and stated that disagreement centered around the selection of a proper runoff coefficient used in the design flow calculation. He had used a 0 .04 while Central Coast Engineering, Mr . Halliday' s engineer, uses 0. 20 . It is Mr . McPherson' s opinion that his determination was properly made and is not subject to appeal to the City Council. Mayor Nelson agreed with Mr. McPherson that the matter should not be appealed before Council. He suggested that Council form a commit- tee consisting of one Councilmember , Mr . McPherson, Mr . Halliday and his engineering representative to find a solution to this matter . Some of the Councilmembers agreed with this proposal; however , Mr . Halliday objected stating that the matter has gone on now for seven months. 5 MINUTES - ATASCADERWITY COUNCIL - JUNE 28, 1982 MOTION: Councilman Wilkins moved that the appeal be denied. Councilman Mackey stated that she would second the motion if Coun- cilman Wilkins would accept an amendment that the matter be referred to committee. Councilman Wilkins would not accept the amendment. Councilman Stover seconded the motion and it failed on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Stover and Wilkins NOES: Councilmen Mackey, Molina and Mayor Nelson There was further discussion regarding the merits of a committee to study the subject with Larry McPherson stating that he has given this matter an extraordinary amount of time and effort and has had several discussions with Mr . Maddalena, Mr . Halliday' s engineer , as well as consulting with several other engineers. He does not see that a committee meeting will change or solve anything. Mr . Maddalena reviewed this matter stating that the. disagreement was a matter of economics; the additional requirement by the City would cost Mr . Halliday between $200 and $300. Councilman Mackey asked if the disagreement over the last seven months had been over only $200 or $300. Mr . Halliday stated that there was also the matter of esthetics. MOTION: Councilman Wilkins moved that Council deny the appeal. The motion was seconded by Councilman Stover and unanimously car- ried. -2. Resolution No. 30-82 approving an interim budget for the 1982-83 Fiscal Year and appropriating funds therefor Mr—Warden stated that with Legislative adoption of the State budget, it looks like the City may receive more than originally anti- cipated and, hopefully, Council will be able to adopt "A" budget. The proposed resolution is merely to "keep the store open" ; only necessary purchases will be made , payroll will continue, capital outlay limited to lease-purchase arrangements, and no hiring or increase in salaries will be allowed until a Final Budget is adopted. Mr . Warden noted that the resolution also approves retroactivity for any salary in- creases and/or benefits as a result of negotiation agreements with em- ployee groups. MOTION: Councilman Mackey moved that Resolution No. 30-82 be read by title only. The motion was seconded by Councilman Wilkins and unanimously carried. Councilman Nelson read Resolution No. 30-82 by title only. MOTION: Councilman Stover moved for the adoption of Resolution No. 30-82. The motion was seconded by Councilman Mackey an* unanimously carried by roll call vote. 6 MINUTES - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL - JUNE 28, 1982 3. Ordinance No. 55 amending Section Map 12-0-33 of the Official Zoning Maps of the City of Atascadero by placing certain property in the R-4-D Zone, Reamer - second reading MOTION: Councilman Wilkins moved that Ordinance No. 55 be read by title only. The motion was seconded by Councilman Stover and unanimously carried. Mayor Nelson read Ordinance No. 55 by title only. MOTION: Councilman Wilkins moved for the adoption of Ordinance No. 55. The motion was seconded by Councilman Mackey and unanimously carried by roll call vote. 4. Ordinance No. 56 adding Chapter 1 through 9 to Title 6 of the Atascadero Municipal Code relating to Health and Sanitation Mr . Warden explained that Council was in receipt of some correc- tion pages offered by the County Counsel' s Office. Because of these changes, it would be in order for Council to approve reading of the Ordinance as amended and set final reading and adoption, over to their next meeting. MOTION: Councilman Wilkins moved that Ordinance No. 56 be read by title only. The motion was seconded by Councilman Stover and unanimously carried. Mayor Nelson read Ordinance No. 56 by title only. MOTION: Councilman Wilkins moved that the amendments be approved. The motion was seconded by Councilman Mackey and unanimously carried. D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Request of City of San Luis Obispo to change occupancy tax Mr . Warden stated that the City of San Luis Obispo is requesting that the cities in the County join with San Luis Obispo in placing the matter of increasing transient occupancy taxes on the November ballot. Voters would be asked to consider an increase in taxes from 6% to any- where from 7% to 9% as a means of generating additional revenues. Councilmembers discussed this matter and were generally not in favor of increasing taxes; however , Mayor Nelson felt that if it was put on the ballot, then the people of the community could decide whether or not these taxes should be increased. Mr. Warden pointed out that State and Federal Government is taking the view that cities have sources of revenue to fund City government, and it may be that Council will have to consider placing matters on the ballot in the near future to secure funds to operate the City. MOTION: Councilman Mackey moved that the Council deny support to the cities seeking voter approval of an increase in bed taxes. The motion was seconded by Councilman Stover and unanimously carried. 7 . • MINUTES - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL - JUNE 28, 1982 2. Review of San Luis Obispo Area Council of Governments agenda Mr . McPherson reviewed the agenda with Councilmembers stating that the only objection from City Staff standpoint is in item 17 . He felt that the AB 120 action plan should not be a part of the Regional Transportation Plan because it could allow private claimants to re- quest funds through the Regional Transportation Planning Agency. Council agreed with Staff' s viewpoint and the delegate was instructed to convey this to the Area Council. E. ATASCADERO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT BUSINESS Mr . Warden advised Council that they will probably be asked to appoint the new Mayor as President of the Atascadero County Sanitation District. Also, Mr . Grimes should formally be appointed Attorney for the District. Councilman Mackey stated that she has received several complaints regarding the rates. Mr. Warden stated that Staff was pre- paring a report regarding the rates for Council information and re- sponse to citizens complaints. F. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION (1) Councilman Stover complimented Larry Stevens on the informa- tive meeting held recently regarding new energy standards. It was very well attended. (2) Councilman Stover noted that two Councilmembers do not hav their telephone numbers listed in the telephone book so that the citizens can contact them. Those Councilmembers not already list- ed said that they would take the matter under advisement. (3) Councilman Mackey stated that she would like to hear citizen response on the Council getting monthly salary. She has quite a large telephone bill each month from calling long distance on City business. Also, she using a lot of gas traveling to various areas in the City where Council consideration is required. (4) Councilman Nelson asked if anything was being done for Coun- cilman Highland. Councilman Wilkins stated that a Certifi- cate of Appreciation had been prepared for Councilman Highland; how- ever he preferred not to have a public presentation. (5) Mayor Nelson asked Council to be thinking about holding an open house in July or August at the City Offices so that the public can come a see what the City has and get to know Staff and Councilmembers. He did not think it would cost the City any money, because it could be done with volunteers. (6) Mayor Nelson suggested that the new Council, City Clerk, City Treasurer and City Manager hold an organizational meeting to discuss how they are going to function in the next two years. i 8 • 0 MINUTES - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL - JUNE 28, 1982 2. City Attorney Mr . Grimes had nothing 3. City Manager (a) Mr . Warden asked Council when they would like to have their next budget session. Council set Tuesday, June 29, 1982, at 7: 00 p.m. (b) Mr . Warden asked the Mayor to be thinking about appoint- ments to the Water Advisory Board, San Luis Area Council and Recreation Advisory Board. (c) Mr . Warden asked Council to make a motion to extend the terms of the current Recreation Advisory Board members whose terms expire on June 30th to continue until their successors are appointed. The reason for this is that Council will not be interviewing or selecting new Board members until after the Board' s next meeting. MOTION: Councilman Mackey moved that the terms of the Recreation Ad- visory Board be extended until their successors are ap- pointed. The motion was seconded by Councilman Molina and unanimously carried. (d) Mr . Warden reminded Council to place their reservations for the League' s Annual Convention in. October . (e) Mr . Warden requested a closed session for the purpose of discussing labor negotiations. He did not anticipate any announcements at the conclusion of the meeting. Council adjourned to closed session at 11:10 p.m. noting that at the conclusion of the meeting they would adjourn to the following evening at 7: 00 p.m. for a budget study session. The meeting returned to regular session at 12: 35 p.m. at which time the meeting adjourned. Recorded by: BARBARA NORRIS, City Clerk By: Ardith Davis Deputy City Clerk r 9 II MINUTES - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL Adjourned Regular Meeting June 29, 1982 7: 00 p.m. Atascadero Administration Building The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Nelson. It was noted that the meeting was called for the purpose of continuing the review of the 1982-83 budget. PRESENT: Councilmen Mackey, Molina, Stover, Wilkins, and Mayor Nelson ABSENT: None Council continued review of the budget with questions being an- swered by Mr . Warden. Council tentatively decided not to fund India, Inc. , San Luis Obispo Youth Symphony, San Luis Obispo Symphony, Hos- pice, Resource Center and the Children' s Theatre. They also tenta- tively decided that they would fund the EMT-2 Training program in the amount of $3,426; Family Services in the amount of $300; Hotline in the amount of $300; the Chamber of Commerce in the amount of $16,00,0; and the Senior Citizens in the amount of $2,400. Funding of People' s Self Help Housing was tabled until Councilmembers had an opportunity to look into the program. There was discussion regarding adoption of a final budget with • Councilman Molina stating that he needed more time to study the per- sonnel additions. The meeting adjourned at 9:19 p.m. Recorded by: MURRAY L. WARDEN, City Manager er r CITY OF ATASCACERO TREASURER'S REPORT JUNE 1, 1982 TO JUNE 30, 1982 RECEIPTS TAXES Sales & Use 114 ,605.29 Motor Vehicle "In Lieu" 33,413. 38 Cigarette Tax 3,325.56 Prior Year Secured/Unsecured Tax 1,730.50 LICENSES/PERMITS/FEES 19,696.11 GAS TAX 20,,083.12 TRAFFIC SAFETY 3,687 .91 RECREATION FEES 21,736.45 RETURNED FROM LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND AND MATURED TIME DEPOSITS 135,000.00 INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS 28,705.89 TRANSPORTATION SB-325 2,036.91 REVENUE SHARING -0- GRANTS 60 ,180 .57 MISCELLANEOUS Fines - 697.78 Rents/Consessions 658.69 Reimbursement Grant Officers 2,087 .66 Weed Abatement 333.44 Special Police Services 443.90 Reimbursement SB90 Claim 8,650.00 Miscellaneous 2,259.87 TOTAL $ 459,333.03 1 CITY OF ATASCADERO TREASURER'S REPORT JUNE 1, 1982 TO JUNE 30, 1982 INVESTMENTS LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND 70 ,000.00 TIME DEPOSIT, SANTA BARBARA SAVINGS 14.0% Interest, Matures 07/12/82 100,000.00 TIME DEPOSIT, BANK OF AMERICA 14.75% Interest, Matures 07/16/82 100 ,000.00 TIME DEPOSIT, MID-STATE BANK 14.75% Interest, Matures 07/19/82 100,000 .00 TIME DEPOSIT, SECURITY PACIFIC BANK 14.00% Interest, Matures 08/09/82 100 ,000 .00 TIME DEPOSIT, SECURITY' PACIFIC BANK 13.75% Interest, Matures 08/09/82 100,000 .00 TIME DEPOSIT, MID-STATE BANK 14.00% Interest, Matures 08/23/82 100,000 .00 TIME DEPOSIT, FIDELITY SAVINGS 14.875% Interest, Matures 09/13/82 100 ,000 .00 TIME DEPOSIT, MID-STATE BANK 13.75% Interest, Matures 10/12/82 100 ,000 .00 TIME DEPOSIT, CENTURY FEDERAL SAVINGS 18.25% Interest, Matures 11/18/82 100,000 .00 TIME DEPOSIT, SECURITY PACIFIC BANK 14. 00% Interest, Matures 12/12/82 100,000 .00 TIME DEPOSIT, MID-STATE BANK 14 .60% Interest, Matures 12/20/82 100 ,000 .00 TOTAL INVESTMENT DEPOSITS $1,170,000 .00 teven M. uto, Treasurer 2 CITY OF ATASCADERO FINANCE DIRECTOR'S REPORT JUNE 1, 1982 TO JUNE 30 , 1982 BALANCE AS OF MAY 31, 1982 4,614.50 DEPOSITED BY TREASURER, SEE RECEIPTS, TREASURER'S REPORT, PAGE 1 459,333.03 TOTAL 463,947.53 HAND CHECK REGISTER DATED 06/30/82 192,658.90 CHECK REGISTER DATED 06/15/82 76-,735.75 CHECK REGISTER DATED 06/30/82 69,515.05 EXPENSE LISTING 93,448.71 TOTAL 432,358.41 BALANCE AS OF JUNE 30, 1982 31,589.12 PETTY CASH 150.00 TREASURY INVESTMENTS SEE TREASURER REPORT, PAGE 2 1,170,000.00 • TOTAL $1,201,739.12 I ,RALPH H. DOWELL JR. , do hereby certify and declare that demands enumerated and referred to in the foregoing register are accurate and just claims against the City and that there are funds available for payment thereof in the City Treasury. Dated: July 7, 1982 Ralph H. Dowell, Jr. Finance Director M ray Warden ty M nager 3 'D _ • I � i:"v � .K i-. �� _. i � �. ; L C 1 z> -+ - C: 4- > > K f Z I mi }� J aC nM a l P3 J r+ i _ 11 i C -41 C _^. C O r � C. G rl"•- f r .-.� C �k� i .-t j if 1 1 i+ "P i if t I r t. 1 i if i i 77c o CD f f ! ! I - C = - r _ C ^� b l 17- 7 f 1 i l M I I f ! i f ? ' o � X xx >txxxxxcxxIxxx7c 'c� x xxp< x < xa — c co it F 70 T ! { I j i t � i I r ( I I JI I hFri � s C I �� ;• � � 7II x> xx;X xx < � . x x 5 x r x x x x x c x xx c7 I i-4 41 Iz ` I I - _ C i 77D - g.. n J 7 J"J;0 ;J i J zo .., -i -+ .� -1 c t -+ o�. ! -? V 'J t A .3 .,:AA AAAA ':. A AII N' f J ! J i I i t 1 •1Vi �i I t I ! !. .1 1 _ i ! ! ; ,-�' ".r7 of oco oacoo o� � aI 000c , _ - 7 ti -ID oco o00 -_` y cco a ac c � _ o of o coo � o G^ •c"1I --•-. -.. ca o ,.Jo^c ac o o! o! _.o I o 0 0 t I ,IV iJ ,I. (, J `J fJ 1 J i 'iy .v '. .-. '` -. oao 0 oc oa c o j oc c .; > -• _ ii \ � 9<XX XXX X XXX XX X X X X XXXX1 ^ :< X x - . � oI occ cco aoa ca a o! ooa o ._ = .. - -• -• i V . -17I D- - D- D _ TJ J� N c: V 3Z. TO ZI ZZ ` \ 'J i a V A ; _ v'i _: r 7• V V v \; v V '0 '.)\ t Z, i Ti t:_R v ::J o L'^ !'J :A o .o i � V so - _ 'ri - ^ - - i 0, u_= iA_ Nllr• CJcr - c _ c c c a I LD ZD 0i 2f aw 33333 J --:�;, - �z✓ It - ij. . ' i X X X XXX X ::XY x x X » »_; > \' Y.X Li w P' - - - v03 j ! l tY i w 13 ! tr1 O O I 1 4 � .r> r G Go y coc ac Ga GaG I cG - � i Ul LL }." L✓ C J c v G I L4 w OJ N LL UL IN IX LL i - ! j ! i oi- 71 z Zz Li G Q ul X ". X XY. X T' X X >:XX 'X XX XXX - XXX - t I I i .-• G C oj cp z ! t ! t ! 1 t ! r I t I !I �LL { - 11 ! -. G ..J .v ... C ........`. G } C Z y L' H z t C i i i C c J } # I z z z EfeG z 3 ! i I } c i A t z y) r c-, LL C: C: x C, lin C-- 0 0� tZ cli U-1 a- of Q� �c UZ :> Lj-1 0 o c :> Ir- 7 L.; Z> 2 z -a- 1�� Ln n o ur, 7> z 'Y3 -C n QD C� V� r,7 r-,r-I ro r-r)m 1 x x x x x I x x x x x x x.x x x! x x x U I W LJ L-11 z a- w U L E- w LLi LL2 L 7 C=I U-1 i�z C?, 10 N LIJ 1%ct" C"! R K ct�ol:vj C n v) %Q EL. E- cz C- 0� = C� Z 1 :> U a C-) CL 5z z C-1 L; z C, LD z z z -C x z -Z U re: C� -N C, 17 z CC C c u,P NO'C.Z�, c r.- -T [I V- 03 Q�l CO r,li-; Lo - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 7:7 Lj c C Ir c 'o 71 1 nf i z , ; :3 zzzzzzz cf, < C cc z X x X x x x X x x X x x x x x x X: X X! Ld LL. LLj Tj PJ C. cl (Ij rl, 'Ir Ll— if — - — —— — ————— — —— 7- 7 L� M >- CD D T 0— n U a- W i n— U.. L.) n L" Ll L-) u CL U < Z L :z Z C z < C. C'Z m m cs rl rl, :> z <Z -C t C _ ^ 13 z I Z r - - - - - - - - - - - -77 CD i - i ! } I t _.I v -i 't iJ Z 21, 711"0 to c o 0 0 'r; Cry -12- t t r t t t t t t c r c .. A % .. •moi — z z ? { 1 _ 7- Z z Z-tl 21 — 110 I XX N \ .<XX XX XX X: X `G X x xX Xa; X X X } rA , z I � _ i T izT = i D M i o 17- j r� J > I ; _ - ` IZ> 2> _ i I _ o � z -' � XX x I j � 1 -15- ' _ a -- i 1 2 _ — — 1 z z - ! _ I i I I i i i 4 Z I I ` 1 ! I I f I ! 1 �.• 1 1 I Iz - .F. r� ? - _ LO x'r E E j 1 ^ t r� — x v A t \ .� • I i i i _ , —16— fE r r r ,i t 'e t 1 0 o 1TI E c r r c TI — — _ f = - _ J i x h x X X ,f k X x x >1 _ 4 i _ ! — j v � � A T -:.+iil �'. 'U •,V,. o tel, � I ._ � — j � i -17- 4 i a e m 6 0 6 f f i s r 7 a i � i ro : T - ccc C ccc - I z - wr f � z >" rxxx x ` ?. x C .✓ x\ uxi xv _ : x \ - i 77 ` r s a 71 - z _ cZ 7Z 2f Z = i 77 711 J, A r 'o • a r r s �o ® 0 rg r r r t � f f � !_ i` I i I 7 l z {. - i - � > > i i i I i I , I : 1 i II I 11 I 4 , - - - - C - - i 1 . I I I i I � i - I : T M. T X Z Xa X X X.< k h, x,� T XFr J<XX X XX _- _- L .. - 7 I I - 01 i i I j -19- >� • i • a 6t Y T. T I I. I' oc 41 tq 17 rl I I -20- I I I I ' — j � — — i � — I I• I i — � i \ � — 7c _ — _ - - - - c T A X X X v T >' X .G X >. `C X T. X X X X ? X x x> X a'x x X X x X X T Z } C.. P DI c c` c` m — m i I I L _ - - -22- I - - aZ> 4 ro r, v _ A r". IJ 10r 1 i _ ti. IX 1 XXX X?CX T .-: X XXX uxX X A A D rJ i -23- - CITY OF ATASCADERO • FINANCE DIRECTOR`S REPORT JUNE 1, 1982 TO JUNE 30 ,1982 EXPENSE LISTING PAYROLL DATED 06/02/82 CHECKS #8529-8603 37,667. 41 PAYROLL DATED 06/16/82 CHECKS #8605-8678 36 ,990 .65 PAYROLL DATED 06/30/82 CHECKS #8680-8753 43,047 .97 VOIDED CHECK #13773 ,Ck.Reg.Dated 05/19/82 Pg.3 ( 674.80) VOIDED CHECK #12751,Ck.Reg.Dated 12/08/81 Pg.7 ( 1,471.43) VOIDED CHECK #12113 ,Ck.Reg.Dated 06/30/82 Pg.l ( 1,068 .67) VOIDED CHECK #13905,Ck.Reg.Dated 06/15/82 Pg.l ( 947. 50) VOIDED CHECK #14046 ,Ck.Reg.Dated 06/30/82 Pg.4 (12,766 .02) VOIDED CHECK #14036,Ck.Reg.Dated 06/30/82 Pg.3 ( 62. 34) VOIDED CHECK #14014 ,Ck.Reg.Dated 06/30/82 Pg.l ( 297 .00) VOIDED CHECK #14035,Ck.Reg.Dated 06/30/82 Pg.3 ( 123. 00) VOIDED CHECK #14041,Ck.Reg.Dated 06/30/82 Pg.3 ( 884. 00) c VOIDED CHECK #13867,Ck.Reg.Dated 06/30/82 Pg.2 ( 1,580.00) VOIDED CHECK #14070 ,Ck.Reg.Dated 06/30/82 Pg.6 ( 2,762.74) VOIDED CHECK #13973,Ck.Reg.Dated 06/15/82 Pg.7 ( 19 .82) VOIDED CHECK #13971,Ck.Reg.Dated 06/15/82 Pg.6 ( 1,600 .00) TOTAL 93, 448.71 -24- RESOLUTION NO. 35-82 RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 12-79 AUTHORIZING INVESTMENT IN LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND BE IT RESOLVED by the Atascadero City Council that Resolution No. 12-79 is amended to include the City Treasurer as one of the officers authorized to order the deposit or withdrawal of monies in the Local Agency Investment Fund. On motion by Councilman and seconded by Councilman the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following vote: AYES• NOES: ABSENT: ROLFE NELSON, Mayor • ATTEST: BARBARA NORRIS, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: /s/ Allen Grimes ALLEN GRIMES, City Attorney APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: 0/zo�MU RAY K. WARDEN, City M ger • RESOLUTION NO. 12-79 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING INVESTMENT OF CITY MONIES IN LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND T H E C I T Y C O U N C I L City of Atascadero, California WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 730 of the Statutes of 1976 , Section 16429 . 1 was added to the California Government Code to create a Local Agency Investment Fund in the State Treasury for the deposit of money of a -local agency for purposes of investment by the State Treasurer; and WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Atascadero does hereby find that the deposit and withdrawal of money in the Local Agency Invest- ment Fund in accordance with the provisions of Section 16429. 1 of the Government Code for the `purposes of investment as stated therein as in the best interests of the City of Atascadero. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Council of the City of Atascadero does hereby authorizethedeposit and withdrawal of City monies in the Local Agency Investment Fund in the State Treasury in accordance with the provisions of Section 16429 .1 of the Government Code for the purpose of investment as stated therein; and BE, IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following City officers or their successors in office shall be authorized to order the deposit or withdrawal of monies in the Local Agency Investment Fund: Murray L. Warden, City Manager Ralph H. Dowell, Jr. , Finance Director On motion by Councilman Highland and seconded by Councilman Nelson , the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted inits entirety on the following roll call vote: AYES : Councilmen Highland, Mackey, Nelson, Stover and Mayor Wilkins NOES : None ABSENT: None ADOPTED: August 13, 1979 s ROBERT J. WILIINS , JR. , Mayos ATTEST: MUR1 Y L. RDEN, City Clerk f l ^M E_M_O_R A_N D U_M TO: City Council FROM: City Manager SUBJECT: Amendment of Claim for Local Transportation Funds It is recommended that Councl approve the attached amended claim for Local Transportation Funds. The original $310 ,175 has been changed to $298,543. Upon approval, the claim will be for- warded to the San Luis Obispo Area Council of Government' s staff for endorsement at the next COG meeting. The Claim for Local Transportation Funds was submitted for fiscal year 1980-81 using projections for revenues and expendi- tures at the beginning of that year . The revised figures express the final revenues and expenditures experienced during that year and the activity classifications in which the expenditures were made. The amounts shown on the final claim form are subject to a transportation fund audit. Major differences appear in two categories - Atascadero Dial - A-Ride account was under budget substantially due to the fact that the service was projected for a 4-bus system and the, City was unable to obtain the extra two buses because of State pur- chasing problems. The added amount in Street Maintenance ac- counts for the balance of funds that qualify under this claim. The original amount of $85,175 has been changed to $154,417. Recommend approval of the amended claim. M RAY WARDEN MLW:ad 7-8-82 I ANNUAL CLAIM FOR LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUNDS (Claim Number) TO: San Luis Obispo County Area Council of Governments 979 Osos Street, Suite B San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 FROM: Claimant: City of Atascadero Address : 6500 Palma Ave , P.O. Box 747 City: Atascadero Zip Code: 93422 Contact Person: Larry McPherson Telephone No: This claimant, qualified pursuant to Section 99203 of the Public Utilities Code, hereby requests, in accordance with Chapter 1400, Statues of 1971, as amended and applicable rules and regulations, that an allocation be made in the amount of $ 298 , 543 for the fiscal year 1980 - 1981to be drawn' from the Local Transportation Fund of the County of San Luis Obispo for the following purposes and in the following respective amounts as described in the Annual Project and Financial Plan. City of Atascadero (Claimant) By: Title; ..City Manager Date: Approved by San Luis Obispo County Are: Council of Governments : By: Title: Daae: SLOCOG-TDA-4/S0 EXHIBIT A S T A T E M E N T O F C O N F O R M A N C E The City of Atascaclero hereby certifies that the Annual (clai::;ant) Clair for Local Transportation Funds for Fiscal Year 1980 - 1981 in the a,.,ount of $ 298 , 543 conforms with: 1. Provis:o;s of Chapter I (co;n,,.encinR with Section. 1090 of Division 4, Title I) of the Government Code and the requirements of the Transportation Development Act and its apaiicable rules and reoulatio;;s . 2. The rules and regulations adopted by the San Luis Obispo County Area Council of Governr.:ents 3. The Regional Transportation Plan, Transit Development Program, and the Transportation Improvement Progra�. Further, the clai":ant certifies that the audit findings pursuant to Section • 992"5 of the Transportation Development Act have been complied with: / Yes No Not Applicable --First-year filing for claim CERTIFIED: By: Title Ci ry Manaaer Da.:.. . Al1CCa lOn 1nStr�Cti0;is and pa,Inent b�� the Co;.'nty Auditor to this claim'zint are subject to such ;.,onies being on hand and available for distribution, and to the Provision that such monies ;gill be used only in accordance with the ter:-..s or the a --;roved Annual Project arid, Financial Plan. • EXHIBIT A a :;I PROJECT \D, FI`;-UNCIAL PLA de- e 11 �crie a proposed projects and indicate proposed e1en- ditures for the ensuing fiscal year. Project Title and 1 Regio:al Handicapped Pay,-nent of City ' s share of $71936 Transportation System regional handicapped trans- portation system (Section 99260) 2 Atascadero Dial-A-Ride Includes all direct costs 96 , 190 Transportation System related to operation of the City ' s Dial-A-Ride transit system (System 99260) • 3 Equipment Replacement Fund Vehicle and equipment replace- $25 , 000 ment funds for Atascadero Dial- A-Ride transit system (Section 99260) 4 Bus Parking Lot and turn- For development of property $15 , 000 around Development Fund adjacent to the bus dispatch location to be used for bus parking and turn-around. (Section 99260) Identi y ap .eor_a;e .article ar.` 5ectien of the Act. r _ • EX17TBIT A Prciacn Title and Bre C ' Eescrintion rros2` vT,CL�tt 5 Street Maintenance Overlays and seal coats for 0154 ,417 roads and streets within the City select system (Section 99400a) :l T a. Total claire for Pedestrian a Bicycle Funds (Section 99234) , $ b. Total claim for Article 4 Funds (Section 99260) , $ 144 ; 126 C. Total claim for Article 8(c) Funds (Section 99400c) . $ —0— d. Total claim for Article 8(a) Funds (Section 99400a) . $ 154 , 417 (1) Total agency budgeted expenditures for streets and roads (copy must be attached to claim) . $ 586, QaO_ (2) Percentage ofciclaim (d) of total (d--1) . 26 -o e. Total claim dasiZnated for $ —0— (Other) '°Identify appropriate Article and Section of the Act. f EXHIBIT A M E M O R A N D U M TO: CITY MANAGER FROM: PLANNINGDIRECTOR SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP AT 820505: 1 LOCATION: 5905-5975 E1 Camino Real ( Lot 4 Block LA ) APPLICANT: Clarance Radke (Stewart) REQUEST: To divide 0 .31 acres of developed commercial property into two parcels of 0 . 22 and 0 . 09 acres. On July 6, 1982 , the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the subject matter approving the division subject to Conditions 1-3 as set forth in the attached Staff Report. The Commission discussed the following matter only briefly. Clarance Radke, applicant, appeared and indicated his con- currence with the recommendations by Staff. No one else appeared on the matter. LAWRENCE STEVENS 'MUffRAY WARDEN Planning Director C' y Ma ager i CITY OF ATASCADERO "um"DF r wca.roum 1918 q 6I F, 1979 Planning Department July 6 , 1982 CAIDi STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP AT 820505:1 LOCATION: 5905, 5915 and 5975 El Camino Real (Lot 4, Block LA) APPLICANT: Clarence Radke (Stewart) REQUEST: To allow for the division of 0.31 acres of commercially developed property into two parcels of 0. 22 and 0.09 acres. BACKGROUND 1. Existing Zoning: C-1 , 2. General Plan: Retail Commercial 3. Environmental Determination: The Planning Director has determine that the project is categorically exempt under Class 15 of th California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) . 4. Site Conditions: The site is located within the Central Business District on the northeastcorner of Traffic Way and El Camino Real. The site is presently developed with a gas station and two story commercial structure with the second story being used for two residential apartments. The site is bounded on the south and west by a ` fully developed street and to the east is a developed alley. To .the north the site is bordered by a developed commer- cial lot. 5. Project Description: The applicant proposes to subdivide a 0.31 acre commercially developed lot into two parcels. Parcel A will contain 0.09 acres and Parcel B will contain 0.22 acres. Parcel A will contain a two -story commercial structure and will have ac- cess to El Camino Real and to the alley. Parcel B -will contain an established gas station and will have frontage on El Camino Real, Traffic Way, and the alley. STAFF COMMENTS On Thursday, June 10, 1982 the Subdivision Review Board met with the applicant,, Clarence Radke, and engineer , Dan Stewart, to discuss th;9 project. Also attending the meeting were: Larry Stevens, Planning Director; Fred Buss, Associate Planner; Jill Kollmann, Planning In- TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP ?T 820505:1 (Radke) tern; Patience West, Engineering Aide; and Wayne LaPrade, Planning Commissioner . The following items were discussed: 1. Existing use of the building. 2. Current parking requirements on the site. FINDINGS 1. The application, if revised as recommended, conforms to applicable zoning and subdivision regulations and is consistent with the 1980 Atascadero General Plan. 2. The application is exempt from consideration of the California Environmental Quality Act. RECOMMENDATION Based upon the above Findings, the Planning Department recommends ap- proval of Tentative Parcel Map AT 820505:1 subject to the following conditions: 1. All pipeline and other easements of record shall be shown on the Final Map. A letter shall be submitted from each utility company indicating the nature and extent of any building restrictions. A Note so stating such restrictions shall appear on the Final Map. 2. A Final Map in compliance with all conditions set forth herein shall be submitted for review and approval in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City Lot Division Ordinance prior to recordation. a. Monuments shall be set at all new property corners created and a Registered Civil Engineer or licensed land surveyor shall submit a letter certifying that the monuments have been set prior to recordation of the Final Map. b. A recently updated preliminary title report shall be submit- ted for review in conjunction with the processing of the Final Map. 3. Approval of this Tentative Parcel Map shall expire two years from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted pursuant to a written request prior to the expiration date. 2 TENTATIVE PARCEL AT 820505:1 (Radke) ACTION The Planning Commission should, by motion, direct Staff as deemeaS appropriate. , Jtf REPORT PREPARED BY: ------ __.- JOEL,M(aSES ssociate Planner REPORT APPROVED BY: �� ..(�i�j✓1� LAWRENCE STEVENS Planning Director /Ps 3 �' �'_ �� (�^"' /� i`fir` �� • - r■ �.�° • � .� "fes? -- •�' -_ �- -�� =�� • % • off' � / '� -- - k /- d► � ��CJ v -4/�4I',/•\ - ♦ ®� �1❑ Val fid/ a N ��, (�� ♦ " •s ♦ o ° ►y �, -4 . h%! ♦♦� i o ® � ° � •` �♦ e• a ,,/' ° ■ • •• a ■ ' Y • 1 /! :is/'��/ - � � %♦ ♦ ,!y�' 'j/�.-(,��\�I ,�. �D� � `,� � .�f- } ; � SITC: 4XAT-TON AT 1920506: 6R t 5�5g75 Et,CAM INo Pew. Fti � _ �''� r � % � �,�� ' (� � uc�� 2°t-323-�2 • ',• W� • '> • U CL \ • • '\ • __ 'Y Jac-\ �os�—• • / �� • •�.�•�y� • • _ • � G ♦ / _ }�' . • / � .1� � • ice♦' _ r .\ to �3''S` / _ _>�/ '\•,tom, _�a�i ' �Y � `j � f fid I ► •� t C R//ISO REAL 16.4 lk sapo'. rsop' m a � • 73:W' 30. 2SOp g ALLEY n WAY zz o D v � � a A � O ` n Q •� r .- � � � �� N as� gS < r CAMI ao IG�?1G a CST q,�.vG h� vq ME M0 RAN D UM - -- =- - -1 TO: CITY MANAGER July 7, 1982 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP AT 820513: 1 LOCATION: 7326 Santa Ysabel (Lot 17, Block JA) APPLICANT: Gaylen Little and Don Rauch REQUEST: To allow six apartment units approved by Departmental Review R820309: 2 to be air- space condominiums On July 6, 1982, the Planning Commission conducted .:a public hearing on the subject matter approving the air-space con- dominiums subject to conditions 1-4 as set forth in the attached Staff Report The Commission discussed the matter only briefly. • Gaylen Little, the applicant, appeared and indicatedhis concurrence with Staff recommendations. No one else appeared on the matter. /a�*W AMW - LAWRENCE STEVENS M R L. ARDEN Planning Director City Man ger /vh ofP r _fir r. 1 1979 CITY OF ATASCADERO LAID Planning Department July 6 , 1982 STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP AT 820513:1 LOCATION: 7326 Santa Ysabel (Lot 17, Block JA) APPLICANT: Gaylen Little/Don Rauch REQUEST: To allow six (6)_ apartment units aproved by previous. De- partmental Review R820309:2 to be constructed as air-space condominiums. BACKGROUND 1. Existing Zoning: R-2-B-2-D (506) 2. General Plan: High Density Multiple Family Residential 3. Environmental Determination: The Planning Director prepared A Negative Declaration for the project in conjunction with the De- partmental Review indicating that no significant adverse environ- mental effects are likely to occur. This tract map application is a Categorical Exemption. 4. Site Conditions: The site is generally level and is undeveloped. Vegetation consists of 'natural grasses. There is an existing six foot wood fence along the rear and around both sides of the prop- erty. The site is bounded on the north, east, and south by single family residences, and on the west by Adobe Plaza. 5. Project Description: The applicant proposes to create six three bedroom apartment units as air-space condominiums. Each unit will also include three bathrooms, a full kitchen and living area, a single car garage, a landscaped front courtyard and a rear patio. Each unit has approximately 2,000 square feet of space. A total of six, parking spaces are proposed. Landscaping is indicated within the Santa-Ysabel setback and in planters between parking spaces, as well as in each entry way and courtyard. The exterior ' of the building will be a' combination of cedar siding and stucco with shake shingle roofing. _Plans also indicate one passive solar water heater on the front roof section of each unit. Tentative Tract Map AT 820513:1 (Little/Rauch) • STAFF COMMENTS On Thursday, June 10 , 1982 the Subdivision Review Board met with the applicant, Gaylen Little, to discuss the project. Also attending the meeting were: Larry Stevens, Planning Director; Fred Buss , Associate Planner; Jill Kollmann, Planning Intern; Patience West, Engineering Aide; and Wayne LaPrade, Planning Commissioner . The following items were discussed: 1. Improvements required for the previous Departmental Review. 2. Deletion of fire hydrant requirement. 3. Drainage plan for the site. FINDINGS 1. The application, if revised as recommended, conforms to applicable zoning and subdivision regulations and is consistent with the 1980 Atascadero General Plan. 2. The application as submitted is exempt from provisions of the Cal- ifornia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) since an environmental determination was made in conjunction with the Departmental Review. RECOMMENDATION Based upon the above Findings, the Planning Department recommends ap- proval of Tentative Tract Map AT 820513: 1 subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall establish Covenants , Conditions, and Restric- tions (CC&Rs) for the regulation of land use, control of nuisances and architectural control of all buildings. a. These CC&Rs shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Attorney and Planning Department prior to approval of the Final Map. b. These CC&Rs shall be administered by a Condominium Homeowners Association. 2. That all conditions of approval herein specified and any public improvements required by Departmental Review R820309: 2 are ,to be complied with prior to the filing of the Final Map. 3. Approval of this Tentative Tract Map shall expire two years from the date of this approval unless an extension of time is granted pursuant to a written request prior to the expiration date. 2 Tentative Tract Map AT 820513:1 (Little/Rauch) 4. A Final Map in compliance with all conditions set forth hereirls shall be submitted for review and approval in accordance with themw Subdivision Map Act and the City Lot Division Ordinance prior to recordation. a. Monuments shall be set at all new property corners created and a Registered Civil Engineer or licensed land surveyor shall submit a letter certifying that the monuments have been set prior to recordation of the Final Map. b. A recently updated preliminary title report shall be submit- ted for review in conjunction with the processing of the Final Map. ACTION The Planning Commission should, by motion, direct Staff as deemed appropriate. t REPORT PREPARED BY: JOEL MOSES Associate Planner REPORT APPROVED BY: LAWRENCE STEVENS Planning Director /Ps i 3 S ITS- J o L W o a� L R-2 -a -Z-p C L L _ D . N L p c-2-1C -2 -p -�3-g-2 � o D , II - tk' ti C7 L Z D 2-D ' ry Q a ' \4 ) o \lbCA , \ cl Tom: 2 A_5 -0 \ - D- i _�� D � F ` =N1Pltr MAP �. 7326 SANWA Y!SA%CL q-14/z \ �--- may- 1,7 0 �A crc14/1-IMLe 4` .4 s� -� s ro • ,, - , . e i 2 �s n r� a .. • - i A '��.�� ✓ \ _ �i � o° Asa q•• �' • ' rm J 7 � Y � a `,,o F• off ti j %, � ai 0107 �, ''a'� j� y - • s • •• ��'Ciou 11',� SiTE- � ° ,�� CZo � r '>O• ♦ 'l Q6 �� d9 4 � � c it i . ._, ea �.,� + �, e fro ♦, p� yy�((v • ♦ < •Oce •� ♦,• � �• ",�S / t � 1 � ,. � • • / -9� a e- 09_ �_ �. .ic. - ° a ' �'I 12/ 1 � e / • � a _ - � • _oma. X��/ Zi • ' 4 )S: i 9 Y a�' '• � .Li- � AL1 i��o °�FuP ='QI �� .• � J ' i/�. i - w. V ""o'er 4T 9(�` • • • � � V • `� o ,� ♦ � i l{1J�� jSV��-�2�i eM �F'd�. • : e o��o � ♦ ° � D '1^^ 0�.�j>�.� • � �j 'C ari. L ✓• � gOC.�TtO O' A ti i 75z co "w T"2�. YS6,'15CL I( � � � \S'Ts � �'1 a "/:\� � 607' /7� 1SLOC}q•J q low F t �� +v;� a anti• ld .ate � " i .�� ', �> �, a M, ! ��i � I� �� e �\ c d g• v a 4 y F lip Sp ° t T 7326 MTA YWU car i UC14/LI ME M E M 0 R A N D M TO: CITY MANAGER FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP AT 820426: 1 LOCATION: 5555 Traffic Way ( Lots 28 and 29 , Block LA) APPLICANT: Foxfire, Ltd. (Hoenstein) REQUEST: To allow creation of 21 residential units as air-space condominiums On July 7 , 1982 , the Planning Commission conducted.-,'a public hearing on the subject matter approving the condominium sub- division subject to Conditions 1-5 as set forth in the attached Staff Report. The Commission discussed the matter only briefly. Hank Hoenstein, applicant, appeared and indicated his con- currence with the Staff recommendation. No one appeared on the matter. t�//O,ww 441�lw - LAWRENCE STEVENS MyRRAY . �,aRDEN Planning Director ity Manager M E M O R A N D M ATO CITY MANAGER FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP AT 820426:_1 LOCATION: 5555 Traffic Way ( Lots 28 and 29, Block LA) APPLICANT: Foxfire, Ltd. (Hoenstein) REQUEST: To allow creation of 21 residential units as air-space condominiums On July 7, 1982, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the subject matter approving the condominium sub- division subject to Conditions 1-5 as set forth in the attached Staff Report. The Commission discussed the matter only briefly. • Hank Hoenstein, applicant, appeared and indicated his con- currence with the Staff recommendation. No one appeared on the matter. LAWRENCE STEVENS M RAY GARDEN Planning Director ity Yfanager i iris5 �s s CITY OF ATASCADERO Planning Department July 6, 1982 STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP AT 820426:1 LOCATION: 5555 Traffic Way (Lots 28 & 29, Block LA) APPLICANT: Henry J. 'Hohenstein (John R. Mitchell) REQUEST To allow creation of 21 air-space residential condominium units. BACKGROUND 1. Existing Zoning: R-4-B-2-D(506) 2. General Plan: High Density Multiple Family Residential (16 dwell- ing units/acre maximum) 3. Environmental Determination: An initial study environmental de• scription form has been completed. The Planning Director has pre- pared a draft Conditional Negative Declaration indicating the pro- ject will not have a significant adverse effect upon the environ- ment if certain mitigation measures are incorporated into the project. 4. Site Conditions: The 2.04 acre site isolocated along the urban- ized area of Traffic Way. The, lot does not contain any struc- tures. Natural vegetation is composed of 40-50 trees and native grasses. Overall average slope of the lot is 32.2% from the high- est point at the southwest corner (Juanita Avenue) to the lowest point at the northeast corner (proposed driveway) . The low point has a 'headwall and 24 inch culvert which diverts drainage from the area under and across Traffic Way. An eight inch sewer line runs parallel to the northern property line along the edge of a natural drainage swale. One fire hydrant is located at the center of the lot -frontage along Traffic Way. Water , gas and electricutility lines are in place in Traffic Way. No street improvements exist along the lot frontage, however, improvements abut the site to the south. 5. Project Description: The applicant proposes to create 21 air space residential lots (condominiums) for the purpose of individ- ual sales. The applicant intends to form a Homeowners' Associa- tion and prepare Conditions, Covenants and Restrictions (CC&Rs)i to govern operation and maintenance of the property. Tentative Tract Map AT 820426:1 (Hohenstein) • STAFF COMMENTS On Thursday, June 10, 1982 the Subdivision Review Board met with the applicant, Henry J. Hohenstein, and John R. Mitchell, his architect, to discuss the project. Also attending were: Larry Stevens, Planning Director; Wayne LaPrade, Planning Commissioner; Fred Buss, Associate Planner; Patsy West, Engineering Aide; Jill Kollmann, Planning Intern; and Kami Griffin, Planning Intern. The following items were discussed: 1. Location of the drainage headwall and required street improvement. 2. Drainage improvements. 3. Fire hydrant onsite or move existing hydrant to better location. 4. Retaining device along embankment of Traffic Way frontage when cut by sidewalk improvements. 5. Driveway widths a minimum of 18-20 feet. 6. Tree removal. 7 . Specialized landscaping in the open space area. • 8. Emergency access not required. 9 . Signing not permitted under current code. 10. No grading in the dripline of the trees. FINDINGS 1. The project will not have a significant adverse effect upon the . environment and the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report is not necessary. 2. The project conforms to all applicable zoning and subdivision reg- ulations and is consistent with the 1980 Atascadero General Plan. RECOMMENDATION Based upon the above Findings, the Planning Department recommends: A) Issuance of a Conditional Negative Declaration as follows: . 1. Adequate provision shall be made to minimize grading and tree removal on the site. 2 Tentative Tract Map AT 820426: 1 (Hohenstein) 2. Adequate provision shall be made to minimize fire hazards in• conjunction with site development. 3. Adequate provision shall be made for drainage and erosion control in conjunction with site development; and, B) Approval of Tentative Tract Map AT 820426:1 subject to the fol- ing conditions: 1. The applicant shall establish Covenants, Conditions and Re- strictions (CC&Rs) for the regulation of land use, control of nuisances and architectural control of all buildings. a. These CC&Rs shall be submitted to and approved by the City Attorney and Planning Department prior to approval of the Final Map. b. These CC&Rs shall be administered by a Condominium Home- owners' Association. 2. All conditions of approval herein specified and any public improvements required by Departmental Review R820426: 1 are to be complied with prior to the filing of the Final Map. 3. Approval of this Tentative Tract Map shall expire two years from the date of this approval unless an extension of time* is granted pursuant to a written request prior to the expi- ration date. 4. A Final Map in compliance with all conditions set forth here- in shall be submitted for review and approval in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and City Lot Division Ordinance prior to recordation. a. Monuments shall be set at all property corners and a Registered Civil Engineer or licensed land surveyor shall submit a letter certifying that the monuments have been set prior to recordation, unless certification is received that corners are already monumented. b. A final title policy (CLIA or ALTA) shall be submitted for review in conjunction with the processing of the Final Map. 5. This Tentative Tract Map shall become null and void if De- partmental Review R820426:1 is not approved. 3 Tentative Tract Map AT 820426:1 (Hohenstein) ACTION The Planning Commission should, by motion, direct Staff as deemed appropriate. TO APPROVE: Motion to adopt findings and set conditions. TO DENY: Motion setting findings for denial. REPORT PREPARED BY- FRED BUSS Associate Planner REPORT APPROVED BY: LAWRENCE STEVENS Planning Director • /Ps • 4 • M E M O R A N D U M TO: CITY MANAGER July 7, 1982 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT LA 810320 : 1 LOCATION: 5560 Nogales APPLICANT: Kendall Gallanger (Hilliard) REQUEST: To extend the time allowed to complete requirements for an approved lot line adjustment. On July 6, 1982 , the Planning Commission considered the subject matter approving the time extension for one year as set forth in the attached Staff Report. There was no discussion since this matter was on the Consent Calendar. No one appeared on the matter. -411'.w — - LAWRENCE STEVENS M RAY WARDEN Planning Director City M nager u CITY OF ATASCADERO 1918 1979 r C1�D Planning Department July 6 , 1982 STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT LA 810320:1 LOCATION: 5560 Nogales Street (Ptn. 'Lots 2 and 3, Block OA) APPLICANT: Kendall B. Gallanger (Hilliard) REQUEST:, To extend the time allowed to complete requirements for -an approved lot line adjustment. BACKGROUND 1. Existing Zoning: R-1-B-3-D 2. General Plan: Moderate Density Single Family Residential 3. Site Conditions: The site is generally flat near the front to steeply sloping in the rear . Both lots are presently developed with single family residences. The lots have frontage on Nogales to the west, while the remaining three sides adjoin developed residential property. In addition to the residences on each lot, Parcel B is developed with a garage situated within the required front yard setback. 4. Project Descriptions The ,applicant is requesting a one year time extension for filing a final lot line adjustment map. TAF S FMMENT CO S On April 20 , 1981, the Planning Commission approved Lot Line Adjust- ment LA 810320:1. The applicant is now .requesting a time extension to complete requirements prior to the recordation of the final lot line adjustment. On June 10, 1982, the Subdivision Review Hoard met to review the time extensionandindicated that there was no reason not to grant the time extension. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Department recommends approval of the time extension sub- ject to the conditions set forth at the time the project was original- ly approved. Approval of this one year time extension shall expire at 5:00 p.m. on April 27, 1983. ' Nd .C'.c CGtY�j AGGFJ-'•JEp � `i`�' - _ �'E�Fi^"E+.. ✓� � .� Nlo'O(oS.Z`CtJ14.c� f1 � t, 4 t "� ��✓EQ<sr co 7.3 oa ;C O T Ax�� RCL .B 8 o_ G.zass o { r q eEa=0 804 • ^jam - � ,� 1�'1} `•D - F o / /O OPE,V NdiPE ORO.4CCF-f;+'EJ p" FNO / /•�-OPEN NO.PE.'..�Pb,{L.:.FPTEO��NS HA2_/ f�2/'�KOP GOR 04 A1,2Fd¢�.duF Ga2.._,, A1,2.P caeo, FrCt- IV--r AO.O R-/fM qfr=O.25�AQGE G_ ti 'N RE-/yavFo f/ � CO 7. 77, p ilb .91 13 Y IN. t l4eW v Q V l �c e p P Go.Q 'RF_S.ET%9•'.2.-U';2 - :: .H opo L.s. av 72.0/ - �-� 2'.3735" •P-/B9O-B3.- - /9 L S./6 we !/y 9 d-6 03:5'6 .Qa/9iR Bs• ! ,L=/•49�� ,Z�' =.. Fv O. Cd,lJELG - 11=G�0•i:30 /5008 , ,�=.9,0.$3• _ _ Aw;�' Y/E£T s/ _ �.gg <•_.�z.6o.e - -e=•v z9'sv 3r� �' 7 S 3� • N `' v= .2/'08 0 p b e3, a_ -,-As <=.Zo.O--, PIN ry Tt f d=-�='09;33•,e=/9ia B3'.0 72.0/"N �roT.aL� °�I� .. h -� _ / G /v�T�//� '.. • _ L j � � � jzs s-r"�'• 0 i i' •1"�J `T . .�r i � �I _�-•;spa= i! 3 c 1 f �- t Lilt j I Vi yy - Lot Line Adjustment LA 810320:1 (Gallanger) ACTION Direct Staff by motion as deemed appropriate. REPORT PREPARED BY: ' KAMI IFF Planning Ifitern REPORT APPROVED BYk:�Za_uA —�4k z�Ii LAWRENCE STEVE S Planning Director /Ps • 2 1 � ti Cil O 1 �z, /� •C "�',Y i��s \ m �(' /% SSG. \ F• O \�D 9 C n O 0 cc-J yLQ t� 19 / � r C � + 0• co "Y' V d.0tl 00, j G �� /9 `.,�/�" \o a 36, �� a a p �S•B / d 6 Q\ � n v 4�� J • pp \I\ 1,30 ,3 4s O /O �t Cb Lig • �— � � O CID pl w w -4 A '� `�• - ro � ,moi._ J s` h N tD tiro 0 c,;U N N ! / ` O _ NO__ .� •.. r ` tiC.!•i y I t 1 to N I� H Ill <O.j -r.y (Al Tr b H r f i .0 h - gra Asf.. 1 v LRA+T790 0 W N D g N N O/!V/ ••O� k�jY, �� I I �t ti O A W u qI r A_ A 0 N r O acv � l N A e j� tf w A V I , (y •/� V Co m a � U co rO %\ ti ID mep ° 3i-B m a 3 e j9, row y wa rr.;' L198'/o320 go IV j o r i M E M OR A N D U M TO: CITY MANAGER FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW R 820426 :1 LOCATION: 5555 Traffic Way (Lots 28 and 29, Block LA) APPLICANT: Foxfire, Ltd. (Hoenstein) REQUEST: To. construct 21 multiple family residential units. On July 6, 1982 , the Planning Commission conducted.; a public hearing on the subject matter unanimously authorizing a Conditional Negative Declaration and approving the multiple family project subject to Conditions 1-15 as set forth in the attached Staff Report. • The Commission discussed the matter only briefly. Hank Hoenstein, applicant, appeared and indicated his support for the Staff recommendation. The following persons appeared and commented on the matter: Doug Lewis inquired about the soil stability of the site, the use of Juanita Lane for access, the location of the sewer line and the steepness of the driveway. No one else appeared on the matter. G Jam - LAWRENCE STEVENS RU-AW L A DEN Planning Director City ana "er • f . G ., 1918 1979 CITY OF ATASCADERO \ 0/ Planning Department July 6, 1982 STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW R820426:1 LOCATION: 5555 Traffic Way (Lots 28 & 29, Block LA) APPLICANT: Henry J. Hohenstein (John R. Mitchell) REQUEST: To allow construction of 21 multiple family residential units. BACKGROUND 1. Existing zoning R-4-B-2-D(506) 2. General, Plan: High Density Multiple Family Residential (16 dwell- ing units/acre maximum) 3. Environmental Determination: An initial study environmental de-e scription form has been completed. The Planning Director has prepared a draft Conditional Negative Declaration indicating the project will not have a significant adverse effect upon the envir- onment if certain mitigation measures are incorporated into the .project. 4. Site Conditions: The 2.04 acre site is located along the urban- ized area of Traffic Way. The lot does not contain any struc- tures. Natural vegetation is composed of 40-50 trees and native grasses. Overall average slope of the lot is 32.2% from the high- est point at the southwest corner (Juanita Avenue) to the lowest point at the northeast corner (proposed driveway) . The low point has a headwall and 24 inch culvert which diverts drainage from the area under and across Traffic Way. An eight inch sewer line runs parallel to the northern property line along the edge of a natural drainage swale. One fire hydrant- is' located at the center of the lot frontage along Traffic Way. Water , gas and electric utility lines are in place in Traffic Way. No street improvements exist along the lot frontage, however , improvements abut the site to the south. 5. Project Description The applicant proposes to construct 21 mul- tiple family residential units (condominiums) on 2`.04 acres of land (10 .29 dwelling units per acre) .- Each unit is a two story, • two bedroom dwelling with floor areas ranging from 860 to 958 square 'feet. Floor plans A, C and D each have two car garages;: floor plan B has a one car garage, and eight open guest parking spaces are provided for a total of 47 spaces on site. Proposed Departmental Review R820426:1 (Hohenstein) • exterior elevations indicate use of horizontal wood "Cottage Lap" siding and composition roof. The site is laid out on two terraces with a single driveway entrance at the northeast corner from Traf- fic Way. The two terraces are joined by a driveway with a 19% grade. A large area between the terraces is to be a natural open space area planted with low maintenance vegetation. Twenty-five to thirty of the forty to fifty trees on the site are proposed to be saved. An onsite fire hydrant has been proposed by the appli- cant for the upper terrace. Grading will be kept to a minimum. A project sign is proposed alongside the entrance drive. STAFF COMMENTS Staff reviewed the project and noted that it generally conforms to ap- plicable development standards with some site modifications to drive- way widths, drainage, street improvements and elimination of the pro- posed project sign. Staff wants to ensure that adequate width is provided throughout the project, especially in the entrance area. Speed of traffic along Traffic Way may require a widened shoulder area for right turns into the project. The sign proposed by the applicant is not permitted under the current zoning ordinance. • FINDINGS 1. The project will not have a significant adverse effect upon the environment and the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report is not necessary. 2. The site of the proposed multiple family residential use is ade- quate in size and shape to accommodate said use and all yards, fencing, parking, landscaping and other features required by the Atascadero Municipal Code. 3. Streets in the vicinity of the proposed use are adequate to carry the quantity and kind of traffic generated. 4. The proposed use will have no adverse effect on abutting property or the permitted use thereof provided all conditions are complied with. 5. The establishment and conduct of the proposed multiple family res- idential use for which the Departmental Review is sought will not be detrimental to the public welfare or be injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood. 2 Departmental Review R820426:1 (Hohenstein) RECOMMENDATION • Based upon the above Findings, the Planning Department recommends: A) Issuance of a Conditional Negative Declaration as follows: 1. Adequate provision shall be made for drainage and erosion control in conjunction with site development. 2. Provision shall be made to minimize unnecessary grading and tree removal on the site. 3. Adequate provision shall be made to minimize fire hazards in conjunction with site development; and B) Approval of Departmental Review R820426 : 1 subject to the following conditions: 1. Site development including buildings , driveways , parking, landscaping and other features shall be consistent with plans submitted including modifications included herein. 2. Submit two copies of detailed landscape and irrigations plans indicating size, type and spacing of plant materials proposed for review and approval by the Planning Department prior to issuance of building permits. • a. Raised concrete curbs or similar shall border each planter area. b. Plant materials shall be sized to achieve a mature ap- pearance within three years. C. The type of irrigation system shall depend upon the type of plant materials used and their watering needs. d. Special attention shall be given to retaining as many existing trees as possible on the site. The applicant shall review all proposed tree removals with the Plan- ning Department and may be required to make minor revi- sions to retain those trees. Protective measures for trees to be retained shall be reviewed with the Planning Department for adequacy. 3. In the event that archeological resources are discovered on the subject site during construction of this project, said resources are to remain undisturbed after discovery and con- struction activity shall cease immediately. The Planning Department is to be notified so that proper disposition of the resources may be accomplished. Construction may resume only upon authorization by the Planning Department. • 3 Departmental Review R820426 : 1 (Hohenstein) 4. Building architecture shall be consistent with elevations submitted. a. Roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted unless it can be adequately screened from public rights- of-way and adjacent property. 5. Provision shall be made for paved and enclosed trash storage areas in locations approved by the Planning Department. 6 . All new utilities and utility connections shall be placed underground. 7 . Outdoor lighting fixtures shall be designed to minimize on- site and off-site glare. 8. Submit two sets of grading and drainage plans indicating grade of building pads, flow lines at top of curb, etc. , for review and approval by the Planning Departmentprior to is- suance of any permits. a. Drainage from site shall not be allowed to flow directly to adjacent properties or across any public sidewalks or driveways. b. The existing headwall for the Traffic Way culvert shall be relocated in conjunction with road improvements. C. All grading shall conform to Appendix Chapter 70 of the Uniform Building Code. Any grading necessary for site development shall be subject to first securing necessary permits. Grading within the driplines of existing trees shall be kept to a minimum. 9. Parking shall be provided generally as shown on plans sub- mitted. Parking and access areas shall be paved with a mini- mum 2" AC on adequate base. Spaces not located within gar- ages shall be striped and provided with wheel stops or ap- proved functional equivalent. a. Driveways on the lower terrace and entrance shall be a minimum of 20 feet in width. The driveway to the second terrace shall be a minimum of 18 feet in width. 10. The project shall be connected to the community water system. Submit evidence from Atascadero Mutual Water Company indicat- ing they are willing and able to provide service prior to is- suance of permits. 11. The projet shall be connected to community sewers. Obtain a sewer connection permit from the Atascadero Sanitation Dis- trict which has indicated that they are willing and able to provide service. 4 • 0 Departmental Review R820426: 1 (Hohenstein) 12. The fire hydrant existing at the frontage of the lot shall beAMk moved closer to the driveway entrance unless an on-site fire hydrant is provided. Relocation of the existing hydrant or location of a new on-site hydrant shall be approved by the Fire Department. 13 . Install concrete curb, gutter and sidewalk and street pave- out along the entire Traffic Way frontage. Said improvements shall be constructed under an inspection agreement and en- croachment permit issued by the Public Works Department. a. Improvement drawings shall be submitted to the Public Works Department for approval. b. Any dedications necessary to accommodate required street widths shall be made. C. An approved form of bank retention shall be employed adjacent to the public sidewalk improvements. Said plans shall be, submitted to the City Engineer for approval. 14 . This Departmental Review approval is granted for a maximum period of one year from the date of final approval unless a time extension is granted by the Planning Director pursuant to a written request filed a minimum of ten days prior to the expiration date. 15. All conditions of approval established herein shall be com- plied with prior to occupancy of the buildings by the pro- posed use. ACTION The Planning Department should, by motion, direct Staff as deemed appropriate. REPORT PREPARED BY: FRED BUSS Associate Planner REPORT APPROVED BY: LAWRENCE STEVENS Planning Director 5 \ r ` 14 . �s ero f C /� p ••� /�� • • I rm 74 olf � �� 4125 � �''• •_ � s • �C • � r s • O ``,' • i f r\ � 1 • I , SCADERO • ' • c, ((�7�y A— E3--T)\J VD;/ ' ♦ • a� i�' `7 pp .,` • p•��•• .•� • 'l '� poi • man .sem �w JI � _ ! / r, • � .c, r' 9_ • �e�1 r87 i •% e �`' '\ 4 ♦� ■lir • i s • 'z� •oe • o a j • ', �9 • • • • • �� e a ji'Li`�, �. �, r 1,e � e 4/ p '• Ick _ " ��= Q - ;,::o• �i LOCATION 0 Z/ M-0,1SMA)l �� e�° ? Loist�q, soot,- L�} .r ��.4i•-' '• � � � ice. 1�j� S . � -..�` moi/ .., / - •R � �, - �� ,, 1 - r �.� ;� I ,.%- • h' •- � •. �- � • .�� 1.ly�f � II � `l�• �iJ�v�• 11 y` � '�' � ��`� a��.cM y. �' � ��- , � , �•. �� h �1��ri,, �� • . � �� + � ; ►Tit � ® r .ia.... � tri J��. �� ,... ��- ' 1h' -r ' •, i:' �� 1 ' � �� • �` •;, � � �. ,, \ .. -_ ` �. ;�, �� ' t 4 � • � ♦ ` � �� I 1 � � d! '.. : � ,III � ` a • • i� t�� '� � 1 �ev� �� S . . -� � � � . • � .I" � � � � � ;�; • � �• f LZL6'b►G _ - -.. w..�m•VLtir;sd�.: �[:i+.9 Edspo s+n1 uK,$ns►moo ets11W 'a NHOP :x'!'3.1 �-e�.JXC3J 'nau aoaror� I ItZi I ; r - + �.•Y��'-..alit - �r^ . G - _ 1_f w to � r 2 Jl— rw cw IS ------=------=- ----5-- -_ ----- - ----= - . � 1 i - a� -/ < 5S-S5 r�jG �9-- MEMORANDUM TO: CITY MANAGER July 7 , 1982 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT GP820330:1 ZONE CHANGE 2820330 :1 LOCATION: 35,55 E1 Camino Real (Lot 102, Block 19) APPLICANT: Wallace Dunn REQUEST: To change the General Plan land use designation from Suburban Single Family Residential to High Density Multiple Family Residential and to change the zoning from A-1 to R-4 . On May 17, 1982 the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the subject matters and denied the General Plan Amendment and the Zone Change as set forth in the attached Staff Report. On June 7, 1982 the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 7-82 denying the General Plan Amendment. The Commission discussed the following matters related to this recuest, conformance of the proposed density with land use policies` in the General Plan - suitability of the steep terrain for senior citizen housing adverse effects on surrounding single family residential ` area Wally Dunn, applicant, appeared and stated his support for the reauested General Plan Amendment and Zone Change. He pointed out the need for housing in Atascadero which was affordable for senior citizens, the limited opportunity for future Federal Funding for such projects and the desirable aspects of the subject site (i.e. low/and cost, capability to connect to sewer) Mr. Dunn also explained the status of the Federal program under which funding was being sought. Ralph McCarthy, applicant' s architect, provided some background on the design of the project. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT GP820330:1 ZONE CHANGE 28203*:1 Page 2 The following persons also appeared and commented on this matter: Joe Walters, El Camino Real resident, expressed concern regarding a possible safety hazard that would be incurred with regard to erosion and inquired about the cost of the extensivegradingas opposed to locating a high priced piece of property for the project. Robert Robinson, adjacent property owner, stated his opposition to the requests and noted that if the development is constructed as proposed, it would look right down into his back yard. Victor Parker, adjacent property owner, noted his objection to the` project and talked about the steepness of the slope of the hill. Virginia Cook, El Camino Real resident, commented on the diffi- culty involved in controlling the erosion problem that washes down from the slope and noted that because of the steepness of the hill, it would be difficult for senior citizens to move about. Pam Cox, property manager for Briarwood Management, noted that locating senior housing in the City is quite difficult because of fixed incomes and the limited number of appropriate types of units. Harry Russell, Robert Anderson, and Bill Graham, all adjacent property owners, expressed their opposition to the project because it was their feeling that the density was inappropriate for this area and the project was totally out of character with the general plan. Mike Jackson, Amargon 'resident, noted that in his previous exper- ience of managing apartment units, it was almost impossible to rent a two story unit to senior citizens because of the difficulty in going up and down the stairs. Mrs. Scantlon, Paso Robles resident, noted that senior citizens have had _difficulty in trying to locate affordable housing in the City. She also commented that 'there are three year waiting lists in Paso kRobles for this type of housing. Paul Pickering, SylviaWakeman, and Mr. McCoy, all area residents, expressed their opposition to the project due to the erosion problem and the feeling that the concept of the requests was out of character with surrounding densities and the 'general plan. Richard Shannon, area realtor, talked about efforts made in trying to locate a suitable site for this type of project Clayton Fell, Paso Robles resident; talked in support of the pro- ject and ro-ject "and commented that the erosion problem could be solved through good engineering standards. GENERAL PLAN AMENNT GP820330 : 1 ZONE CHANGE 282033 1 Page 3 Donna Hare, Colima Road resident, felt that the project was not compatible with surrounding area. Scott Greenaway, Palomar resident, commented that area residents are only trying to insure protection of their property and family investments and noted there are other programs available for financing that would enable flat land for this type of project. Joe Rinehart, San Pedro resident, noted his objection to the request and felt that the steep grade would make it difficult for senior citizens to move about. Wally Greenaway, Rosario resident, also concurred that the steep slope would pose difficulty for seniors and noted that the project is not consistent with surrounding densities . Art Perella, Hermosilla resident, objected to the project. No one else appeared on the matter. LAWRENCE STEVENSd RAY . WARDEN Planning Director ity anager RESOLUTION NO. 7-82 A RESOLUTION OF THE ATASCADERO PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT GP 820330 : 1 (DUNN) WHEREAS , the Atascadero Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the subject matter; and, WHEREAS , Government Code Section 65323 provides that a general plan be amended by the adoption of a resolution; and WHEREAS , approval of the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change applications should not result in any significant adverse environmen- tal impact as long as appropriate mitigation measures are introduced; and, WHEREAS , the proposed General Plan amendment would encourage dev- elopment which is not consistent with policies set forth in the 1980 Atascadero General Plan since it would not be compatible with sur- rounding land uses and densities; and, WHEREAS , the intensity of use which would occur from the proposed project is out of character with existing and proposed uses in the surrounding neighborhood. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Atascadero Planning Com- mission does hereby recommend denial of General Plan Amendment GIs 820330: 1 (Dunn) . On motion by Commissioner and seconded by Commissioner , the foregoing resolution is adopted in its entirety by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: DATE ADOPTED: SHIRLEY MOORE, Chairman ATTEST: LAWRENCE STEVENS , Planning Director APPROVED AS TO FORM: ALLEN GRIMES , City Attorney it 7-7 F n i .w.«.m CITY OF ATASCADERO 191 \ mo/ Planning Department May 17, 1982 STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT GP 820330: 1 ZONE CHANGE Z820330:1 LOCATION: 3555 El Camino Real (Lot 102, Block 19) APPLICANT: Wallace Dunn (Robert Smith) REQUEST: To change the General Plan land use designation from Sub- urban Single Family Residential to High Density Multiple Family Residential and to change the zoning from A-1 to R-A. BACKGROUND 1. Prior Action: On April 19, 1982, Staff presented General Plan Amendment GP820330 : 1 to the Planning Commission for consideration. The Planning Commission, with subsequent concurrence from Council, directed Staff to consider the application and prepare a report without expanding the area to include other properties. 2. Existing Zoning: A-1 3. General Plan: Suburban Single Family Residential g Y 4. Environmental Determination: An initial study environmental de- scription form has been completed. The Planning Director has pre- pared a Conditional Negative Declaration indicating no significant adverse environmental effects will result if certain mitigating measures are incorporated into the project. 5. Project Description: Information submitted by the applicant in support of the requested changes from Suburban Single Family Resi- dential to High Density Multiple Family Residential and from A-1 to R-4 indicates future intent to develop a portion of the prop- erty (approximately three acres) with multiple family units in conjunction with a proposed senior citizens housing project (52 units) . The remaining two acres would eventually be developed as a church facility by the Pentecostal Church of God (current owners of the property) . • 0 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT GP820330:1/ZONE CHANGE Z820330 : 1 STAFF COMMENTS The applicant' s request involves both a general plan amendment and a zone change. Government Code Section 65862 allows for simultaneous hearing on such requests although the hearings may be concluded at different times. The property in question was originally intended to be developed as a church by the owner , the Pentecostal Church of God. The property was annexed to the Atascadero Sanitation District and Improvement District No. 1 in 1977 and it is the only property on the north side of El Cam- ino Real that is in those Districts . The applicant' s proposal to con- struct multiple family units is based on the ability to connect to the sewer . While the General Plan does not indicate that access to sewers is a consideration for locating multiple family development, it does establish other criteria (see Residential Policy Proposal #7 , p. 62) such as topography, drainage, fire protection, traffic circulation and compatibility with surrounding land uses for consideration in evalu- ating such proposals. Of most concern is the appropriateness of the site for the intended multiple family use in light of the surrounding large lot, rural resi- dential uses. An "island" of multiple family development at approxi- mately 16 units per acre would not seem to fit in with the surrounding single family residential area. Lot sizes in the area range from . 5 acres to approximately 5 acres, with the majority of the lots bein slightly over one acre. Of those lots immediately surrounding the property in question, all are single family residences. Across El Camino Real, development consists of a small amount of commercial with a number of single family residences. It is likely that as time passes, future development on the south side of El Camino Real will be commercial in nature, as the General Plan designation is Commercial Park and Retail Commercial. It seems particularly difficult to create such "spot" situations where there would be major density differences between properties possessing similar characteristics. While certain merit can be attached to the desire to provide housing affordable to senior citizens, it is never- theless important to do so on sites with appropriate compatibility with surrounding uses. The subject site for this development seems particularly out of character with surrounding development due to significant contrasts in intensity of use including drainage, site coverage, density and traffic. The subject site differs from adjacent property only in that it can connect to community sewers. General plan and zoning decisions should be based on site characteristics rather than the desirability of a particular development proposal. FINDINGS 1. Approval of the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change applicav tions should not result in any significant adverse environmental impact as long as appropriate mitigation measures are introduced. 2 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT GP820330:1/ZONE CHANGE Z820330 :1 2. The proposed General Plan amendment and Zone Change would encour- age development which is not consistent with policies set forth in the 1980 Atascadero General Plan since it would not be compatible with surrounding land uses and densities. 3. The intensity of use which would occur from the proposed project is out of character with existing and proposed uses in the sur- rounding neighborhood. 4 . Granting of a Zone Change which would be inconsistent with the General Plan is inappropriate. RECOMMENDATION Based upon the above Findings, the Planning Department recommends de- nial of General Plan Amendment GP820330: 1 and Zone Change 2820330:1. ACTION The Planning Commission should by motion direct Staff as deemed -appro- priate. (Note: A Resolution should be prepared for a General Plan Amendment. ) REPORT PREPARED BY: JILL KOLLMANN Planning Intern REPORT APPROVED BY: LAWRENCE STEVENS Planning Director /ps 3 _ o `\ f I`au n:7e-21A ` �.___.___ O4 ` "V GyE t{5 ;r,T'k� y`r_y�.• >`h � 1 � p_-- — •N ��...i tiro l�."'f .six-_ N : O Cj 0 2 rle ,ar � .v Lo•ciW �•:. AN y w N7 �, ROAD a rl 0 0 •sl Ci Z f 2.92 � � �' . _IN N 'n'f" ` Z2/� o N ss) iytl e.?•.Y's` '`r""aS"�Y'-+... - •a .O b, z✓c_•D 1 'vw N. i 4r:1`a:F'.Mi�t=t=�'%t'�f?N.P3:•?�iM. jro L)3� rto Jei Hn..AL3 P-21P O L a �1� a R.M.AL3-21 p >43 Otygt `1 � . -i s cvz y1l I 1G ! f eon p ,� F,�� upLill s Ov � � \/ ,'nl � �,.L to s,._ A y � y ` ♦ .° -3 N. AL3-21 _ w � � N i. (TD � h Jsi! tOT A H `OI N •� 1 w ? RM AL3_21 '' A Yi N plw nl a ' �..• _ i '' r, i ®2 NF^ .I �^ �, �r ° ' ,,• SAY r1t. -Y .s� 7 �+ C O w ; _ ° a N w _ �+ v •' osape O�•� a i4 O s % �I—_ y ems' $µp a . 1r6..i o � CO _ p I O ' t �v 9 I<O a 1 f ei r - li C1 A Z400-�� • J, ��/ +( ° OZ301>n 9�,�,1 ®.� y\?M�,� 9 ® ^' 0,.. f. 4.,.,.• C, EkJS11N CRZo t z c pe P-0 '•) C •l. MENph�E C\O / Z3 u N N/S M I rI4 AVE- --------- YE.H�—� MFA MOSILL VrnN p r A'i L I A � V ,Gy 11� I.J yli�.�.V .'lf�H/�=^:C-�I:.•: r d r- v r a in 3 1 JZ v N a m ROAD A O m 4 n �N 2 "• _j C D Z � !O jjf. 3 \ C - QI ry m r f'�GaD.•z•'Y-•i E�.xi�5'q`Y .- � � � D -•N 1 N 12 J!� ,4t i-Isnt.4�1 ��i.-..s`�` ..So Ss _•n; W ro a� �..�nsk4-t��'GD C.C.S s':�z O O ` d rG' D s a u - a Zs iGV wl O O 4jj O N 0') ' vu BIW p oa a � � Y _I °v o m p °c ,•p n t• Zc - i' O r �l .p m 3 � ti "• s „c - (p .is "� I _ ♦ S. AC -21 N m y o � i •• aC pl c �y,'135Kd - Z9 B 1' 4 '" �� :o irx .. .. 1 5 �_.Qj\ S T � 7 •Q ,_: �' a Subvrban Sin9l� FamIl ° CommerclaI Par k -a ai Commerc ib � i 1 \ Y O tt Ole- Q •- - •n L _ x 3° 7 ;'�� QO' I� O - s oZ3 lot CENERAL FLAN o•• �, c 0820330: �uNNMtTN .� Q °Lid' .r..W..0....0 f//./■MEMO■■/r wi■■■/ SOM e t Aw 0 INS ®ENDS ��■w■tea. .�� .� �C�► ■ Raw■ MEMO 197■■Mw�®0■Emm■� aim 01 eWINNER . f iNoun uI�t'Jvi®®l it Cali �i► � • moll Wwonvow e • + _t wol Von L.O.■■.M.EL■ -, � .. � rl► L 60 now ,. ►�. n.MEw■J■■■M■■N - ....___....... b M_E M O_R A-N D U_M TO: City Council FROM: City Manager SUBJECT: 3F Meadows petition for street maintenance The attached memo from the Public Works Director; outlines at least two alternatives for consideration in addressing the main- tenance and construction of some non-dedicated, as well as dedi- cated, streets within the City. It also applies to the petition forwarded by the property owners in 3F Meadows asking for consid- eration of alternative street construction and maintenance pro- grams. The overall City-wide implication of these approaches may be a subject you would care to discuss as well as the particular applications to; 3F Meadows. Whichever approach you:- favor it would be appropriate to instruct Staff to prepare the necessary implementing documents to either address only the 3F Meadows problem, or to consider the City-wide problem, or any portion of these two alternatives. It would appear that the maintenance district offers the greater number of options. It may be more favorable from a prop- erty owner ' s standpoint in that the property owners themselves can determine the level 'of road maintenance and the City merely acts- as a service agency in meeting those property owner deter- mined standards. Because of the overall prohibitive costs of attempting to solve all the road problems within the City, it seems that an approach as suggested herein by the maintenance district offers the best opportunities for solving some of our street problems. adopted. Accordingly, it is our suggestion that the Council instruct Staff to prepare the -n-ecessary dormumenLg for a ro .aintenanne district oac n , upon preparation of the necessary analysis ana im documents, that schedu ed h arinas be held to work out some of the problems involved JR;R AL� . WARDEN MLW:ad 7-8-82 M E M O R A N D U M TO: Murray FROM: Larry McPherson SUBJECT: Response to Petition for Street Maintenance in Portions of 3-F Meadows Development On March 10, 1982 you received a petition from 44 property owners in the 3-F Meadows area asking for City assistance in maintenanceofsome of the roads in that area. The petition covered the lots fronting on the following streets: Andrita, Casanova, Carmelita, Barranco, Barranco Heights, and Lucinda Lane. The request was to provide guidance and investigate the various methods for providing long term maintenance to the roads mentioned above. For the Council 's information, the discussions and findings discussed in this memo can apply to a wider scale area or to even the entire City. In times of financial limits such as this City's present experience, it is extremely important that suppl4mental sources of funding be explored to enable the maintenance of all City streets at a reasonable level. Before discussing the various maintenance alternatives based on this request, it is in order to briefly outline the City' s responsibility for providing this service. Since 1957, the Streets and Highways Code provides that: "No public or private street or road shall become a city street or road until and unless the governing body, by re- solution, has caused said street or road to be accepted into the City street system; nor shall any city be held liable for failure to maintain any road unless and until it has been accepted into the city street system by resolution of the govern i ng.�bod " .4 wi ._... _� ,� e ....�..�, .._�, • �....�• „Sf ' :3 �aas� 7xdded� ter.Government Code on August 25, 1981 providing that maintenance work performed by City forces on any road that has not officially been accepted as a part of the road system does not constitute a liability or ongoing maintenance obligation by the fact that work was done by City forces. This City presently maintains- only the roads that were previously accepted by the County Board of Supervisors or by the City Council. All other roads, public and private, that were not accepted by 'formal Board or Council action are not maintained. Street Maintenan � - ce 3 F page two Although the roads in 3-F Meadows are public roads and im- proved to a higher standard, they were never accepted for maintenance by the governing board. The reasons behind this situation are varied and controversial, but basically revolve around a disagreement between the developer and the County concerning road construction standards. Following are some alternatives available to have road maintenance services provided by the City should the Council agree to provide those services: 1) Bring the roads up to current City Standards by any means necessary, including asphalt overlays, drainage structures, widening, or reconstruction. City would accept the roads into the City system on satisfactory completion of the corrective work. The work could be accomplished by the owners using qualified personnel and private financing or they could petition to form a road assessment district whereby the City would have the engineering and con- struction performed by contract, arrange financing, and bill the property owners by annual assessment. Several assessment procedures are available to achieve this alternative. It should be mentioned that the least expensive alternative would be to have the work done without going through the assessment process, since the property owners would be required to pay all adminQj� istrative and financing costs with an assessment district. These administrative costs frequently add substantially to the final assessment. The advantages of a road construction assessment district is that it spreads the costs to all benefitting property owners and allows the costs to be spread over a longer term. A rough estimate of the cost of this alternative would be a one time cost of $85, 000 to $100 , 000 for con- struction only. This equates to a cost of $1, 200 to $1, 400 per lot plus any engineering, administration, or financing costs. 2) Create a maintenance district as provided starting in Section 5820 of the Streets and Highway Code. Benefitting property owners would pay an annual assessment to cover the costs of City provided street maintenance. Street Maintenanc-1-F page three This alternative creates a maintenance district covering the benefitting properties and allows those in such a district to have street maintenance services at cost, which would be collected as an annual assessment on the property tax bill. Those property owners within such a district would decide on the level of service to be provided and make recom- mendation to Council to fix the assessment rate. This procedure does not incur any long term City maintenance responsibilities and the property owners can petition to dissolve the district subject to City Council approval. The size of such a district is flexible and can be limited to several properties or cover the entire City. The advantage of the road maintenance district is that it can provide any level of service without the necessity of the initial high cost of bringing the streets to current standards. Usually the annual maintenance assessment is much lower than would be the payment on an obligation bond for the street construction. Presently it costs approximately $2 , 500 per mile to provide basic maintenance services for City streets. This does not in- clude capital projects such as overlays or reconstruction, which would bring the total cost to approximately $5, 000 per mile under the current program. Based on a calculation of 2.15 miles of roadway with 72 lots in` the area under consideration, it would cost $5, 375 or $75 pe � A4per year for basic street maintenance services such as: pothol* •rejjair, shoulder grading, drainage maintenance, -signs, etc. In order to provide for upgrading or long term repairs or replacement the annual fee should be around $150 . This would allow some reconstruction or major work to occur within a 5 to 7 year period. In any event, funds collected and not expended for maintenance within the year collected, would be placed in a restricted account and accumulated toward the cost of any future major work on the streets within the district. Recommendation: After a considerable review of the alternatives as well as the legal constraints, it is my recommendation that Council accept the petition as evidence of interest of the property owners fronting • certain streets in 3-F Meadows in having the City take initial steps to form the maintenance district, fix the assessment, and determine the limits of the maintenance benefit. Street Maintenance: 3-F page four • This procedure allows opportunity to property owners to express their views prior to any final action. LAWRENCE McPHERSON LM:vh 7-7-82 • l RESOLUTION NO. 31-82 A RESOLUTION OF THE ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL APPROVING AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF MORRO ROAD BETWEEN PISMO AVENUE AND SANTA ROSA ROAD INCLUDING APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT GP 820331:1 (KLOWGARD) WHEREAS, the Atascadero City Council_ conducted a public hearing on the subject matter; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65323 provides that a general plan be amended by the adoption of a resolution; and WHEREAS, the proposed land use change would create logical transi- tion from Highway 41 to the residential areas; and WHEREAS, the proposal is compatible with surroundingland use and; zoning; and WHEREAS, the proposal is consistent with the policies of the 1980 Atascadero General Plan; and WHEREAS, amendment to the Land Use Element Map of the 1980 Atas- cadero General Plan as proposed will not result in any significant ad- verse environmental impact. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Atascadero City Council does hereby approve General Plan Amendment GP 820331:1 (Klowgard) mak- ing changes to the 1980 Atascadero General Plan Land Use Map as shown on the attached Exhibit Map entitled "Recommended General Plan Land Use Map .Changes to the South Side of Morro Road Between Pismo Avenue and Santa Rosa Road. " On motion by Councilman and seconded by Councilman , the foregoing resolution is adopted in its entirety on the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ADOPTED: • • Resolution No. 31-8 - GP 820331:1 (Klowgard) ROLFE NELSON, Mayor ATTEST: BARBARA NORRIS, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ALLEN GRIMES, City Attorney APPROVED AS TO CONTENT MU/MY Z WARDEN, City rk �I 2 LT- r RECREATION 3 Ja SPECIA , 1, 1 .' I l' 'io n rea / C. t 9 Re ij f' r i� 1 /d• J 1 1 1 r J" J J •Jp� Suburban Single Family Residential \ I l a. i r- i r` <` Density Single Family / High ResidentialLA i "RECOMMENDED GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP CHANGES TO THE SOUTH SIDE OF MORRO ROAD BETWEEN PISMO AVENUE AND r� SANTA ROSA ROAD" • NL-hT� RESOLUTION NO. 32-82 RESOLUTION OF THE ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL APPROVING AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE 'MAP WITHIN THE MONTECITO - EL CAMINO REAL STUDY AREA, INCLUDING APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT GP 820204:1 (MAXWELL, EDDY, HIXSON) WHEREAS, the Atascadero City Council conducted a public hearing on the subject matter; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section; 65323 provides that . a general plan be amended by the adoption of a resolution; and WHEREAS, amendment to the General Plan as proposed will not re- sult in any significant adverse environmental impact as long as ap- propriate mitigation measures are introduced; and WHEREAS, expansion of the commercial cluster in the Santa Rosa intersection area with El Camino Real is appropriate in light of ex- isting uses and the small amount of additional commercial land being created; and WHEREAS, modification of the Land Use Map as recommended is con- sistent with policies set forth in the 1980 Atascadero General Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, ,BE IT RESOLVED that the Atascadero City Council does hereby approve General Plan Amendment GP 820204:1 (Maxwell, Eddy, Hixson)- making changes to the 1980 Atascadero General- Plan Land Use Map as shown on the attached Exhibit Map entitled "Recommended General Plan Land Use Map Changes to the Montecito-E1 Camino Real Study Area." On motion by Councilman and seconded by Councilman the foregoing resolution is adopted in its entirety on the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ADOPTED: ROLFE NELSON, Mayor • Resolution No. 32-810- GP 820204:1 (Maxwell, Eddy, Hixson) ATTEST: BARBARA NORRIS, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ALLEN GRIMES, City Attorney APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: MU Y WARDEN, City Manager • 2 •'•ii°i°°'+i°i°i°��°•i•i°i+i°i+i.•i°i+i0°+i+•.O° +i++��i°i°•i+i+i�i�i� +,+.� .��%%%ii%%%%%%%%%iL�%i+ii°i°i°+°i°°°°•+ii°i°i+•+••��i°++°+i°i+•+••°•i+i°i°i+•++°i°i°i°i°i.•+•+°i+i+i°i+i+•0•iii°i°i°•�•�•i+i°i°i°ie•+•! ••�•i+i°i+•i� +.+++.+i°i°0�,�+�,��i+%0+��•••��,�,�,�,�••�+�,�,+i+i�i�iiei,+�•,�,�,�•�ieii,�,�,�,�•eiii,+,�,�,�•e�,i,+,+�� ••�•++i°i0°i+i°i°i°i°ii°i+i°i0•,� ++0+. _ •°•�°°°�°�°+�•+•i°i°i°i°i .°i°i°�++•i mom °�°+�•�•i°i°i0°i°i+i°i°iO4i°•�•+°•+�+��+�%ii°i°i°+°+° • �- °+s+.+e..+.+� ..e�++ •++.��+,�+�.+++++.+...+°�°i°i°i°i°i+°i°i°i°+Oi° • •°•�•+°�i°�°i°�°i°i°Oi��, ��,�°i°ice •'o°iO�iO°i°i°i°i°i°i°i+i°i°i°+°+•+•+°i°i°i°i°i°i°i�++♦ .+.++.++++0++.++♦ - ��°+��+�•�•e•°•moi ii i �ii i��°i ° �.+ 0++.+e+ +.++++.++++.+.+°ep+.+..+.. .e+++.+++.+...+e++++ •.+.e.iiii iii°°°i+ �� ++•, °+°• .°i°i°i°i°i°i°•+.0+•++ •+°...++++ilii ilii++iiiiiii+•i°i0°i°i°iiiiiiii°O°iO0°i°°♦i°i°i°i°ii°+°•�•�•i°i! ►•i°i°•�•�°i° Liam s+i°i°i°i°iSbi+i+��%i°i°i+i°i%ii�iiiii+�,+ii�0.+++.++++++ +++++++++iiiiiii°°•�•�•�°i°i°°°+�+�•�°ii°i°°°•�•�•�°ii°i°°°•�•�°�•ii �•i°+�•�•ii Iii■Sia■l ,e,+,+i°i°i0°i°i°+.+0°i°i+i°i°i O+i°i°i°i°o+°.•:•i°i°i°e°i°i�°++i°i°i°i°i°°°°i°i°i°i°i°°°O°•i+i°i°i°°+°i°i°i°i°i°°°°+•i°i°i°i°i°°°°°•i°i°i°i°i°°°°°•i°i°i°i°p°°°i°i' ►•s°i°i°•°°i , ii■ ii+i°i1°•�O++i°i°+°� ��•+i°i°i �°��+i•°ii+i°i+i+,°++•i°i°i°i+,�",i°i°i°i°i+,•�i°i°i°i°i°++++i°i°i°i°i°°°°•i°i°i°i°i°+°°i°i°i°i°i°°°°�•i°i°i°i°i°°+•i°i ��•i°i°i°i°+i �ii■■iii i°i° lii+i°i°i0°•i°°+°•+�+,•%%++°,ip,°••00%%i°iiii%i°%%i°i°°%O%i°°°�°%%%%i+i° ,i%%i++%Oii°i�+•••i°i°i°i°+°•••°i°i°°°°�+�•�°i°i°i°°�°�•�•i°i°i •i°i°°�•�•i ti■�if■i • iii+i°i++�°%%%%i+9i%`°��+�+�`��0°iii%°i+i°ie+�•�+°+i+°e�•�+�•iii°i°i+°+° ++•i°i°i°+++••i°i�°°+g+%%%i+•++%%%%i++ii+i+ie�e��+�+�+iei+iie+,� i,+�+�ei,+, S�■Sit ►++0+° .++++i0°i0°i°i°i9000°i°iii°i°°°°+°+°iiL!.fsstLQ�°iiii�i��+�+ii°i°,+�•..�•a!�i � �i�•,i�°°°°�°�%i°i°i°ii°i°i°i°°°•�•�•°°°+eon ii°•�•�°iii iii■,■i!i OWNSf+i+i�+°`�°i!ROI++ +°i++•°••f�iliill .�.++�+,e+ em+ ♦++++e+.°i°i°i°i°i°i°i°i°i°i+,+,+,+,�. Stitt■ii■ ii°ice♦•+•+ Y�r14LL•+9,O��ep.+ ■■/:ri■i�rL��i�+�+�°+°iii+°.f,►'1�/ii■i■.■ ��:.�:�....+:°.+°°.i+%%%%i°i°i+�e� �+�+�%%i°°+ ■i■■a■tib ►°.° +.+.++.++.+..++++iiii irii/ii■t �,�'�■iiiStiti�.t,LtSt'�iiiiiSiits■iiittiLl�ll■i■■■'t.■■■'� iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii IiisiAtt■itliiifii■!Ei■iiS■■■ii■,t '■i.tti■t ��i%iO�ii°°°+�•�•�°i°i°i°°°•�•�•�•i°i°i°i! °•i°i°i°i°+i 1_S■■1■i■ii van ti■<iit>fi■■i■i■iiiii■■■tit■rStii�iif iii+ee,+,+++,+,+�+�+�+�+�+�+�e�+�e�+�+�+�+i0°i' •i°i°i°i+ei ■■ttiiii■1 ■ now [i■■ IS =itft ■iiia■i■tii ,��:�.�:�.::..`..:ii+00+000%iQ +,i++,e++�+o 1■ in11■■i■■ti■, - ■■■ii■ti■■■ ,,,,,+.°.°:°:+:°.+.°°+...+°+..°°°..°ii°i°i°i e.•.•i°i°.% 11■i■ii■t. • i■■iiiit7■ ♦+++++..e++e+++.++..+++.e. ♦...++ ■■■iimamma 1-■■■■■t■i■ iitii■■7■■ i■ mass . . •��%%%%i.%��i°i+i°��+��%%%sem%+�� °�i��+�,� iiii■ [■■�iE.ii■i _ +.++.+.+.e.+.+++ ♦+e++e°i. ++..+,+ Moms Know tiit tett tiiS ii ii,i i■li ■■iiii3t■t■iiit °ei°i°i+i°i°i°i°i°i0°i�i°i°ii°i°i°+°i°i�ii� ►iris%iii 1MORE i#tiff ■Mi■i■i■ift<tit:■Tti■istit■■ ■,■iSa■itt■■ ++.+..+++.++.e.�!!� MUSE MOM" r•.r��rr��s��E/►r///s RESOLUTION NO. 33-82 i RESOLUTION OF THE ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL APRPOVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT GP820419:1 ` (PLANNING COMMISSION) AMENDING THE TEXT OF THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN ELIMINATING SPECIFIC STANDARDS FOR THE KEEPING OF ANIMALS WHEREAS, the Atascadero City Council conducted a public hearing on the subject matter; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65323 provides that a general plan be amended by the adoption of -a resolution; and WHEREAS, the project will not have a significant adverse effect upon the environment and the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report is not necessary; and WHEREAS, the General Plan is intended as a general guiding policy statement for the City. Technical development standards' should be ad- dressed in the zoning ordinance which is the manual that sharply de- fines the physical requirements necessary to comply with General Plan policies. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Atascadero City Council i does hereby approve General Plan Amendment GP 820419:1 (Planning Com- mission) amending the text of the General Plan Land Use Element to read as follows: 1. Change the text of the Land Use Element on page 59 of the General Plan under the heading "High Density eliminating " . . .The keeping of poultry and other animals is not a per- mitted use on lots of one-half acre or Tess." 2. Change the text of the Land Use Element on page 59 of the General Plan under the heading "Moderate Density" eliminating: "The keeping of poultry and other animals, excepting swine, may be a permitted use. The keeping of hoofed animals shall require a minimum lot size of one acre for the first animal- and an additional one-half acre for each additional animal. " 3. Change the text of the Land Use Element on Page 59 of the General Plan under the heading "Low Density" eliminating: " . . .The keeping of poultry and other animals`, excepting swine, may be a permitted use subject to the same acreage provisions as listed above. • Resolution No. 33-810- GP 820419:1 (Planning Ctission) 4. Change the text of the Land Use Element on Page 59 of the General Plan under the heading "Suburban Single Family Residential" eliminating: 10 " . . .the keeping of poultry and other animals, excepting swine. . ." 5. Change the text of the Land Use Element on Page 62 of the General Plan under the heading "Residential Policy Proposals eliminating "8. In cases where animals are desired, a minimum of one- half acre is required for keeping poultry and small ani- mals, of one acre for a single large hoofed animal, with an additional one-half acre for each additional animal." 6. Change the text of the Land Use Element on page 62 of the General Plan under the heading "Residential Policy Proposals" adding: "8. In keeping with a basic goal to retain the rural atmos- phere of Atascadero, appropriate densities, minimum lot sizes, setbacks and other development standards- for domestic animal raising shall be established in the Zon- ing Ordinance. " On motion by Councilman and seconded by Councilmae , the foregoing resolution is adopted in its entirety on the following voter AYES: NOES: ABSENT. . ADOPTED: ROLFE NELSON, Mayor ATTEST: BARBARA NORRIS, City Clerk ' 2 Resolution No. 33-82* GP 820419:1 (Planning Cossion) APPROVED AS TO FORM: • ALLEN GRIMES, City Attorney APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: 01 BRAY . WARDEN, City Manager • • 3 RESOLUTION NO. 34-82 RESOLUTION OF THE ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL DENYING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT GP820330:1 CONCERNING A CHANGE IN LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM SUBURBAN SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO HIGH DENSITY MULTIPLE FAMILYRESIDENTIAL WHEREAS, the Atascadero City Council conducted a public hearing on the subject matter; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65323 provides that a general plan be amended by the adoption of a resolution; and WHEREAS, approval of the General Plan Amendment should not result any significant adverse environmental impact as long as appropriate mitigation measures are introduced; and WHEREAS, the proposed General Plan amendment would encourage dev- elopment which is not consistent with policies set forth in the 1980 Atascadero General Plan since it would not be compatible with sur- rounding land uses and _densities; and WHEREAS, the intensity of use which would occur from- the proposed project is out of character with existing and proposed uses in the surrounding neighborhood. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Atascadero City Council does hereby deny General Plan Amendment GP 820330:1 (Dunn) .' • On motion by Councilman and seconded by Councilman , the foregoing resolution is adopted in its entirety on the following vote: AYES: NOES- ABSENT ADOPTED: ROLFE NELSON, Mayor ATTEST; I BARBARA NOR RIS, City Clerk • Resolution No. 34-82 - GP820330:1 (Duna) APPROVED AS TO FORM: ALLEN GRIMES, City Attorney APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: MU AY Y. WARDEN, City Manager 2 M E M O R A N D U M - - - - - - - - - - - TO: City Council FROM: City Manager SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 56, Health and Sanitation Please bring your copies of the ordinance to the meeting with You-in case you have any questions. XJ M Y L. ARDEN MLW:ad 7-8-82 • s • F F ---=7 ii ... - ... S3 S June 30, 1982 i r_ TO: '4r. Art McDole, Chairman 911 Advisory Committee All California Cities Forwarded herewith is City of Seal Beach Resolution Number 3180 "Requesting the State to Fund Certain Portions of the Costs of the 911 Emergency Telephone System" which was unanimously approved by the City Council at their regular meeting of June 28, 1982. • The City Council authorized that this resolution be forwarded to the 911 Advisory Committee as well as each California city and request your consideration of similar legislative action. Very, truly yours, anne M. Yeo, C'ty Clertc -fty of Seal Beach JMY/js Encl . (1 ) RESOLUTION NUMBER X10 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH, CALIFORNIA, A CHARTER CITY, REQUESTING, THE STATE TO FUND CERTAIN PORTIONS OF THE COSTS OF THE 911 EMERGENCY TELEPHONE SYSTEM. WHEREAS, Assembly Bill 515, adopted in 1972, established a one-number emergency telephone system throughout the State of California, designated as 911, and required that the system be fully operational by December 31, 1982; and WHEREAS, Senate Bill 1180, signed into law September 28, 1979, mandated ` a users tax of one-half of one percent be collected on the telephone billing to each residential or centrex subscriber, which would provide sufficient funding for the installation and servicing of the system; and WHEREAS, the City of Seal Beach has now complied with the State's mandate and provided the necessary telephone equipment, for what is deemed an adequate emergency telephone service for the citizens of Seal Beach; and WHEREAS, the State of California is paying for the :Installation of all the emergency telephone equipment except that equiP,nent classified as incremental cost equipment; and WHEREAS, the City of Seal Beach has, after due consideration for the life saving capabilities and investigative abilities, vis-a-vis the needs of its citizens, installed an automatic locations indicator which is classified as incremental cost equipment; and WHEREAS, sufficient funds have been and are now being collected to cover • the costs of the automatic location indicator, if the funds were not loaned to other State accounts, and if the interest accruing to the funds was continued in credit to the Emergency Telephone Users Tax account; and WHEREAS, the State of California has borrowed 20 million dollars from the users tax account as well as diverting all interest accrued since 1979 from the monies in the account and placing all of the same in the State General Fund. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Seal Beach does hereby petition that the funds borrowed from the Emergency Telephone Users Tax account and all interest accruing to that account be placed back into that account: and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of°Seal Beach requests that the incremental costs incurred by the City of Seal Beach, for the instal- lation and monthly servicing of the automatic locating equipment, be refunded to the 'City of Seal Beach by the State of California from the Emergency Telephone Users Tax account. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED by the City Council of toeyof Seal Beach, California, at a meeting th eof on the Sf� day !- 1982, by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers% 20` c �ic. f�S - f NOES: Councilmembers ABSENT: Councilmembers Mayon ATTEST: A '' ity Clerk