Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 03/08/1982 AGENDA - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting March 8, 1982 7: 30 p.m. Atascadero Administation Building Call to Order Pledge of Allegiance Invocation Roll Call Proclamation declaring the week of March 8 , 1982 CAMP FIRE 72ND BIRTH- DAY WEEK, proclamation presented for signing by the Chumash Council of Camp Fire Public Comment A. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Item A, Consent Calendar, are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion in the form listed below. There will be no separate discussion of these items. If dis- cussion is required, that item will be removed from the Consent Calen- dar and will be considered separately. Vote may be by roll call. • 1. Minutes of the regular meeting of February 22, 1982 (RECOMMEND APPROVAL) 2_ Treasurer' s Report, 2-1-82 to 2-28-82 (RECOMMEND APPROVAL) ' 3. Acceptance of Tract Map AT 8-10227: 1, 9525 and 9550 El Parque (Lot 18, Block JC) , Edward and Judy Young (Poler) (RECOMMEND .APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) 4. Acceptance of Parcel Map AT 810420:1, Santa Lucia and Cencerro Road (Lots 13-17, 29, 30 of Block 85 and Lots 13-17 of Block 57) , Tenneco- (Twin Cities Engineering) (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLAN- NING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) 5. Acceptance of Lot Line Adjustment LA 811204:1 3105 &, ':3125 San Fernando Road (Lots 29, 30, Block 25) Elizabeth R. Miller (Stewart) (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOM- MENDATION) ECOM- MENDATION) 6. Acceptance of Parcel Map AT 811028 : 1, Santa Lucia and Cencerro Roads (Lots 4, 5, 6, 34 and 35 of Block 84 and 85) , Tenneco (Twin Cities Engineering) (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMIS- SION RECOMMENDATION) • Wff AGENDA ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL — MARCH 8, 1982 CONSENT CALENDAR Cont'd • 7. Acceptance of Tract Map AT 810121:1 (Lot 6, Block UA) , 6800 Alcantara Avenue (Lot 6, Block UA) , Gaylen Little (Twin Cities Engineering) (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) 8. Business License for "Big John Strong Circus to conduct 'a circusonMarch 30, 1982 at the corner of San Anselmo `and El Camino Real (RECOMMEND APPROVAL) B. HEARING`, APPEARANCES AND REPORTS 1. Public hearing on Final Environmental Impact Report 'Zone Change Z801107:1; between Highway 41 and San Marcos Road (Ptn. Lot 46, Block 40) , Langford and Ibsen Enterprises (Stewart) to rezone property from A-1-BV-5 to A-1-2 1/2 2. Public Hearing on General Plan Amendment GP 811019: 2; Morro Road between. Highway 101 and Portola; initiated by Planning Commission; to consider text and map amendments within the Morro Road Study Area and ,adoption of Resolution No. 8-82 approving General . Plan Amendment GP 811019:2 amending the text of the land use element and the land use map within the Morro Road Study area C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS • 1. Consideration of removing Booster' s Club sign in front of Chamber of Commerce office 2 Resolution No 9-82. denying' General Plan Amendment GP 811019: 3 concerning minimum lot size criteria in the low density and suburban single 'family residential land use designations 3. Resolution No. 10-82 approving General Plan Amendment GP 811019: 1 amending the text of the land use element to establish different density standards in high and low density multiple family res- idential areas 4. Resolution No. 11-82 approving General Plan Amendment GP 810930:1 amending the text of the land use element and land use map within the North El Camino Real Commercial Study Area 5. Resolution No. 12-82 approving amendments to the text of the land use and circulation elements and to the land use map within the E1 Camino Real Transitional Study Area, including approval of General Plan Amendments GP 811001: 1 (Rauch) , GP180325:2 (Walley) , and GP 810902:1 (Salmeron) , and denial of General Plan Amend- ments GP 810930: 2 (Lindsey) , GP 810922: 1 (Lalande) , and GP 810928-: 1 (Hohenstein) • AGENDA - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL - MARCH 8, 1982 D. NEW BUSINESS None E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION 1. City Council 2. City Attorney 3. City Manager MINUTES -- ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting February 22, 1982 7:30 p.m. Atascadero Administration Building The meeting was called to order at 7: 30 p.m. by Mayor Wilkins with the Pledge of Allegiance. The invocation was given by David Hickson of the Covenant Church. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Councilmen Highland, Mackey, Nelson,. Stover and Mayor Wilkins ABSENT: None PUBLIC COMMENT None I� A. CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Minutes of the special meeting of February 9, 1982 (RECOMMEND APPROVAL) _ 2. Minutes of the regular meeting of February 9 , 1982 (RECOMMEND APPROVAL) 3. Tentative Parcel Map AT 811211: 1, 8030 E1 Camino Real, E. C. Knight_ (Stewart) , toallowsubdivision of .80 acres into two parcels in the C-2 Zone (RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING -COM- MISSION RECOMMENDATION Mayor Wilkins reviewed the items on the Consent Calendar . MOTION Councilman Stover moved for the approval of the Consent Cal- endar . The motion was seconded by Councilman Mackey and unanimously carried by roll call vote B. HEARINGS, APPEARANCES AND REPORTS 1. Conditional Use Permit U811130:1, appeal of Planning Commis- sion denial, 7379 E1 Camino Real, Northern California Savings and Loan (McCarthy & Brady Architects) , to approve a 45 sq. ft. monument sign with the total signing to exceed 60 sq. ft. in the C-1 Zone - continued Larry Stevens reviewed this matter. Council had referred it back to the Planning Commission because Council felt that consideration should be given to an approval by the Advisory Board prior to the • City' s incorporation. Mr . Stevens stated that the Planning Commission had again considered the matter and reaffirmed their previous posi- tion. • MINUTES - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL - FEBRUARY 22, 1982 Mike Brady, representing the applicant, urged the Council to approve the appeal. He stated that the applicant agreed with the findings set forth in the Staff report. Councilmembers indicated that they wished to approve the monument sign. Mayor Wilkins asked if a condition could be added which would restrict approval of the the sign to the financial institution - only. Mr . Stevens said that this could be done. Councilman Mackey did not see why the financial institution should be considered as a special case anymore than other businesses in the Adobe Plaza. MOTION: Councilman Mackey moved that Council support the Planning Commission' s decision to deny the Conditional Use Permit. The motion died for lack of a second. MOTION: Councilman Highland moved that Council grant the appeal and include the findings that are listed in the Staff Report dated 2-16-82 along with the four conditions; ` and that the use permit be granted. The motion was seconded by Councilman Nelson. After further discussion, the motion was amended. Councilman Highland amended his motion to add to the 2/16/82 Staff Report an additional condition,` No. 5, limiting the sign to financial institutions only. The amendment was ac- cepted by Councilman Nelson and the motion was unanimously carried. -_2. Planning Department quarterly departmental report Larry Stevens gave a report on the activities in his department during the past year . He reviewed the number of permits and applica- tions processed as well as outlining theproceduresadopted for proc- essing matters coming to the Planning Department. C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Budget request for Fiscal Year 1981/82 by' Atascadero Chamber of Commerce Mr. Warden reviewed his memo to Council noting that the Chamber is requesting $12,000 for Fiscal Year 1981/82 with an assumption` that they will request $16,590 for Fiscal Year 1982/83. Mr . Warden pointed out that, at 'present, forecasts for municipal revenues are unclear because of proposals made by the governor which would severely cut back on City revenues. He cautioned Council as to these uncertainties which should be considered beforemakingcommitments supporting activ- ities which are not a part of basic City services.` Mike Lucas, President of the Chamber of Commerce, made a brief presentation. Councilmembers discussed this matter with Mr. Lucas at • length. Councilman Nelson asked if the Chamber members wished to be tied - to the City in this way. Mr. Lucas said he did not know if it 2 MINUTES - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL - FEBRUARY 22, 1982 was the consensus of the entire membership, but that it was the con- sensus of the Board of Directors. Councilman Highland stated that when he, the Mayor and Mr . Warden had met with members of the Chamber of Commerce, he thought the Cham- ber was going to present the City with specific projects they wished to have funded. The information now presented to Council does not reflect that type of agreement. He said that he could see funding specific new projects that benefit the community as a whole, but he could not see funding the Chamber for things they had provided in the past on their own. There was considerable discussion regarding an economic development study. Mr . Lucas maintained that there were other areas in which the Chamber could work with the City and they wished to do so. Mr. Warden suggested that Requests for Proposals be developed specifying a work plan for developing an economic study of Atascadero. Perhaps this could provide. a method by which Chamber and City interests in this matter could be coordinated in developing an Economic Element to the City' s General Plan. Comments were heard from Troy Mitchell and Norman Munson. Council decided to seek proposals first for an economic developmentsurvey before allocating a dollar figure to the Chamber . 2. Selection of General Contractor member for the Appeals Board and determining terms of office Councilmembers reinterviewed Bob Sonne and John Edens. Each Coun- cilman cast their votes in accordance with the selection resolution and selected John Edens as the second member of the General Contrac- tors group on the Appeals Board. All names of the Appeals Board selectees were put in a bowl and Mr. Grimes drew names to select the terms of office. The first three names drawn were selected for four year terms and the remaining two for two year terms. The four year appointees were Kenneth Lerno, David Walters and John Edens. Mike Bewsey and Karl Keksi were se- lected for two year terms. Mr. Warden stated that there will be an organizational meeting at which the members will be sworn in. After that, each member will have to comply with the Conflict of Interest requirements. D. NEW BUSINESS 1. General Plan Conformity Report — Various Capital Improvement Projects, Atascadero Lake Mr . Stevens reviewed the three improvement projects proposed ' for Atascadero Lake including a par course, a pedestrian bridge and main- tenance dredging for the Lake. Elliott Stephenson reviewed the pedestrian bridge project and the donations of materials and time from various citizens and companies. 3 MINUTES - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL FEBRUARY 22, 1982 MOTION: Councilman Highland moved for the approval of the Planning Commission recommendation. The motion was seconded by Coun- cilman Mackey and unanimously carried. E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION 1. City Council (a) Councilman Mackey asked about the parking restriction signs which are supposed to go up in front of the Post Office; she had asked one of the Public Works employees about it and he said that they just had not had the time to put them up. (b) Councilman Mackey asked if the Zoning Ordinance would be completed before or after the election. Mr . Stevens said that it was too soon to tell. (c) Councilman Mackey stated that she had received some com- plaints about the Zoning Ordinance hearing on March 10th with particular reference to provisions for keeping animals. There are a lot of people wanting to attend that hearing but who will be unable to do so because they work and the hearing is scheduled in the afternoon. Mr . Stevens stated that the schedule of hearings is in- tended to be flexible and that the Planning Commission couldcontinue hearings ,until they were satisfied that all possible opportunities for receiving public input had been exhausted. (d) Councilman Mackey stated that the Beautification Commit- • tee had just -finished planting seventeen trees on Traffic Way. (e) Councilman Stover commented on the article in the Tele- gram Tribune about the speaker at the League of Califor- nia Cities Channel Counties Division meeting in San Luis Obispo last Friday night. The speaker was particularly concerned with the ex- pected bleak financial outlook for cities in the immediate future. (f) Mayor Wilkins asked Councilmembers to contact Ron Bast to have their pictures taken if they have not already done so. 2. City Attorney Mr . Grimes had nothing. 3. City Manager (a) Mr . Warden stated that Peggy Robertson has resigned from the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board. Her term is not up until July, 1984. Council advised Staff to advertise for the position. • 4 MINUTES - ATASCADER04PITY COUNCIL - FEBRUARY 22, 1982 (b) Mr . Warden advised Council that the League of California Cities is sponsoring a one day "March on the Capitol" on March 17th. (c) Mr . Warden stated that he was in receipt of a letter from the Sierra Foothills Community Assistance Project, Inc. , requesting Council support in petitioning the PUC to roll utili- ty charges back to what they were in January 1981. MOTION: Councilman Nelson moved that Council petition the PUC to roll back prices to January 1981. The motion was seconded by Councilman Mackey and failed with Councilmen Highland, Stover and Mayor Wilkins voting no. (d) Mr . Warden reviewed the Council of Governments agenda for March 4, 1982. The meeting adjourned at 9:40 p.m. Recorded by: MURRAY L. WARDEN, City Clerk iBy: Ardith Davis Deputy City Clerk 5 CITY OF ATASCADERO TREASURER'S REPORT February 1, 1982 to February 28, 1982 BALANCE AS OF JANUARY 31, 1982 $; 14,549.50 RECEIVED 476,961.00 TOTAL $ 491,810.50 HAND CHECK REGISTER DATED 02/28/82 152,105.98 CHECK REGISTER DATED 02/17/82 61,663.90 CHECK REGISTER DATED 02/26/82 56,404. 57 PAID LISTING 212,422.66 TOTAL $ 482,597 .11 BALANCE AS OF FEBRUARY 28 , 1982 9,213.39 PETTY CASH 82.36 LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND 160,000.00 TIME DEPOSIT, FIDELITY SAVINGS 13.25% Interest, Matures 03/24/82 100,000.00 TIME DEPOSIT, MID-STATE BANK 12.75% Interest, Matures 4/12/82 100,000 .00 TIME DEPOSIT, SECURITY PACIFIC NATIONAL BANK 12.75% Interest, Matures 5/12/82 100 ,000 .00 TIME' DEPOSIT I CENTURY FEDERAL SAVINGS 14.00% Interest, Matures 05/17/82 100 ,000 .00 TIME DEPOSIT, MID-STATE BANK 13.10% Interest, Matures 6/1/82 100,000 .00 TIME DEPOSIT, SECURITYPACIFIC NATIONAL BANK 15.0% Interest, Matures 6/16/82 100 ,000 .00 TIME DEPOSIT, SANTA BARBARA SAVINGS 14. 0% Interest, Matures 7/12/82 100 ,000 .00 TIME DEPOSIT, BANK OF AMERICA 14 .75% Interest, Matures 7/16/82 100,000.00 TIME DEPOSIT, MID-STATE BANK 14.75% Interest, Matures 7/19/82 100 ,000 .00 • TOTAL $1,069,295.75 RECEIVED LISTING February 1, 1982 to February 28, 1982 TAXES Sales & Use $ 85,000.00 Property Transfer Tax 1,170.60 Motor Vehicle "In Lieu" 22,158.98 Cigarette Tax 5,034.55 Prior Year Secured/Unsecured Tax 3,618.46 Occupancy Tax 344. 59 Current Secured/Unsecured Tax 7,203.16 Miscellaneous Taxes 6,713.05 LICENSES/PERMITS/FEES 6,416.76 GAS TAX 12,743.00 TRAFFIC SAFETY -0- RECREATION 5,057.30 FROM L.A.I .F. AND TIME DEPOSIT 185,000.00 INVESTMENTS 5,405.69 TRANSPORTATION 122,800.00 REVENUE SHARING -0- MISCELLANEOUS 8,294.86 TOTAL $ 476,961.00 -2- V:N =0 n O.? O•_ +moi - G � r� N N V�:� r' �: "''1 cI< V CiC < c C � L �I Y.0 0 U l J �L'r nr_ n�. i in LAI ! l a- _ ;c 3 -:I`c �a ^a IG " C "•L C C,C L-1 c a �'• i= - 'T iQ f:'. C f`. -LT F :V ..G` C"F. e L r -� ,-` I < 1 i- -'•-° CI..: � s_:j.+- i _..i -1 M €gyp C� �I p_ kIc ^c {cc cac:- cola c1 _I- .�cc Glc - cca oloc'.a Icc c; oc !. r- is�GX Xs:> XX XI-' K XXX X X XIXX IC�C X X X X X XXX FX�c X X X X 1 o U Lp a Ili + I! # + i # #'I# F � I tLd • 1 t I S i I # ill w •i• i• # .� CP �' a, c a v a G c (I a ^IIII c o \ ..} _ �": a^..• �C G ,_,: a a O:I a =a.J C t` a 'a a I a a .�a 1 � a o 2 it i �i I # � 1 I l CUU II 5� � I ,C •�'. � a ja 0, Iw c ,-" 1a I �I `` toz. �! !• F z it I` I t.. a 'z # ,r G a a s 1 a c coo a c a s as c c c c o o o a1 c Q'^c Ica o a clic I { ' T In- 7•.-: G Ire a I a I a i I^o C +rte, ;- ;E': .e ! -i r. ' C I _ �S- �..+. IN N 1` ; '• I# f 4 E{ IN L) cr Lni:o cc ca^o:=I c c� c qac 1 c i CI i s a) a f a i- _- 'd 3 �w ca aco u.. �m Fw '";.v...:= T r 1= 3 T IVi m 1� I (3•c R-N rr n., o, Com:Ins.e; :I re; a^ M- 1t-n �1 in rr ;'a c,- i - cG N CQ`.a c r C-1 L3� Yc i _ z z O iun _ # r z (:z u 1 W W W Y CL I z s- cj C.3 4r r > r r I- a I;z _=< > r: 3z U c.3 U UCC ' rho_ r .Z- U L's U U 0 d ` 2 Gz Z _ 1 ' E;: 0 �p-G c33:.a=F--F C-U tL 3 I' 3 C: ^ a� ^,M p; C'CJ Ct.'C:. �� o'�' �? : •C .0 �:. .�#si w i�:I Ld Q fel n..0 I„ #. w CC M M w Mc a c am" w a u. t+; M K;• ;^,r, Zzrc oc acc cacc.�.� eco c a o as Goa• } (V Q' C.. I,^ I:% .� I V) Cd f,.j r,4 tj�v CJ .. n` .; C.� i oICD-N s I z ,L= ee ol_ � c',...... ,rea c c co I c- rvncm mn eiy o - _ enrnmc cI_ —n Nrvo I � Ix x >c : x x �X x is x`v.�. x t,- = a ceP" '^a c- pC + C_ }l- ' ,C C _ - \ Fc'C P!M L-t�.C I C c r-�- 7 �:- [: ur1i #r' �a "" V fn i i ` F `1 j ? cc cp opc ^ ac ao oc .v aaboo acct a X _ XXX X� >? Xxi'+�X X X .+C�X X :+CX X X X ycX .>_ �. c r✓L ,�.� - u .3 u I ui t`J 6�i CQ ,,o ..J -c K�c c'a a .., c c Et„ o c I a \ � is t:.j cc ao c aI a a-ccac o ca c rcc cF -c ac.r �o ^' # as ac ca�aa} cab o�+co�oc a,a?^ c� aP a aa�c pc c a 17- c c � g; o i✓a II 'f s ? ! .. .o -;s 4 c} :r C Q ['. CZ Pn � :t hr, J C � J :J� N � : i f� iJ ? ?- 7 b I - i I� t' a s a�. c c o ^ p cpc I..:..� ac c� c c p f- t I � % a 1 :.� I T) S L-L S.1 }p,-:}� 'C tom:,-• I = III la ^ ^ c c ^ao _ abb fm p c cn DO co m ca -' as a ..,.✓✓o .... oa..�coc a i as ca aoaac . C� G v c I c!✓ca a aacc c ! c .ra� ! c a a : I ^ ^ C I�z 0 ; ISI L ? r- 3' r— Lr .z - LD I L. eL' * ~ G C c v L'a <L- Ej �- z Li( L. U i— r s i r z u C^ ='-C'^y..`J Li 'z L C, ,'"� L'3 r ua ^.s.r-'n.E: _ _.G. C i` 1=° C LZ:. c< C:='-_ :':f3 C C :C-3.z z C Q En C C ^'. z,-.Q1 ?- Q C-C ` c z C G 0 C.C C G -I iii EZ C C :.#3 u.u.z. ^_ n: i..:L.CO 1.)04 3 a C -..0 CL L. ;`.. ':. # t.. C tlF: P, r. ,IN:N N^!•c 0 0 --t ^!N 0.L\C!Oli 10 M P:t'. '�a>\-25 -•,. !C 4 iKi n':'r C cu::aa c a c::i'e3 M • z z } c o a o a o o c ..c c o a:o o c c cI J1 ' as Lu T- ? G �✓ O v CF'.r' I-.: C r^-,:V.r -"�v C } ai .. i i a o.c a o a .-•a a a a a c a c g o o c O c a r. J z ? I ..-, zn- �� ,� "1 � � � � � e �� "!� est' P— �r ,_., iz m f 71 7z l f in m 1 i v If{ 1 D It D 1 U) 1 3 1 n t71I -a 1 111 I o it Z I < ~ I ErJ Ull Li ! � i I i1 I i CD al t Cc \ I i y A?1 DTt 'Sym I i X X X,i --1. j f I y p I i 1 i I i 2 i 1 C C C C r t C t t C t t t t i C C c c I {{ 77 i i 3 t ! �7 E � E S � i a S -C I ?S r z it z 1-71 Ia t T ! 1-4 al } n Z t F x } I I I 1 D r-t j tv i n o I I t n v ! no i I to I - j -16- ri W i W W I v C,; t ( V W c z rJ O' v V ti { V �: I m F n Cr, - _ i I I _ c 3 o j 1 � I z r; — O O i 3 m z. cl ,�; �I -i C n TTI I Lo to 1 � c' is Sc _ ct z = M _ T c nn c ro - c C) -0 �o c� z oop S koo o I to Z o l . . I P c o z c z c! 0 7m_c cc l ac o c c b o 0 4o x z o o c o7, o P rJ r%: rJ N rJ rJ i J I rJ J I m-r! O J -{ -i r-1; - ? --i rl: --1 1-1 V LI r• -1 -+.to C`r n -i -i Cr I m z Ti... -C O OCn I m i J D D o _ o o� c o• op cook hoc o i 'R n i r. v N N W •r.. - I C x -n ! t 1 I 1 t l I ;I II I II I {, I I I I t- I _ D D a l a a rJ r_z J I�J.> o a 1 pp -i Ii U c C-r; q L" o 'n cD .� I -b C �o cio p00 0 o t D O O I O ( d o' o of _ ca oc cv p cco o, cm I Ck-I u'7 o a ,�JJ rJ n N rJ J fJ rJ il I'U rJ�JfJ 1 G'7 \ �'J rJ,-• a fJ J I O[!I r D Cr'; oa NO V r �A .» Lr. I W p I 7H V. c boo r- i� ao ob 1fill \ O 7 II' o ,^ ci III I _�• c : c. o cl V! o-�c oocD;c 00 0 o o{o iJ o o 0 1 H ^1 m t- 11 m m r'7 '.rn m X m11I m I xi x xi x c: x x X{ xrx K x X{X x x c X. I -i it I I I i 1 1 1 1 I ! .I1 - c{ c oI o c' a c a1 0!✓ C> ��pcDcooD oo a o i r- .-' I o 0 0 0 1 of c c ai o 00o poo 0 0 I -Q ai o of c _ o� c� of olo ooh W{ �; x' n111l11 C9{ ,� �O n J s Cl P J 1 r .T;. 'J i �7!-! C r rJ'? > A - ro I z Z rill -•l o!c W m t,•1- V'r I -il ._ Z: S Z r; _ -o !�I T:'^ D Y- z.\.. D'.3 N --I�; "9nr. m z 1 z R; Xrlti NI-i G� C £ I z ;z D 3 Iz 7 D-i z � -1 Itv z R J c D z I m ty ID z n 1 m I � I i-d i 1 Z Z I rJ I I \ ' I i m j ' N I f W I t W , -- +� J sa P ur I I a C o� i ea I o f'��\ �I, a--; V rl +r c -C `0� c 'J O I 'r C LR Cn rJ _ .r,l .rl C-:_� W 1-'N o 1-c U F., x V I i 7, o�T 1 z j m i o � - O A a 'jr.) n o' a 1.A CO I0 � .C: ,0 i I 1" t t t t f ( 1 ( ( f i {- W z m T < ! + M. .Z !� O • 1. i Ln � a w ro .•� o 'a mcc o o c � c µ I � o c ~ �. '.I 13Z � •. V a A W W rJ I W 44 fJ V en a v m > i.r ! m o x z 3 r m { :> -i n r x -1 -0 M m 3 o m Z z 3 I z s n n D a j :-I I r F D -n z .o z M z r — E z � T E D I n z z 0 C M, D M Co 0 ! N � 1 n O D G m ;o ; ;o I 1 I D z ,, -q r D o m m n 0 en tv o zrrl 111 { I I ! -zt I i 0 i i I SO Sc 20 M G O r c 2c. 000 G m0 i0 So •SG ZG i 1 m ( _. m 1 M I In I m I 1 I 91l I I i no n 0 n c n o CCC777c o y70 000 ((C(77"S30 +-oo ^-c }�o '"10 ! R'1 E NO X O m o l 7C o Q o pCo 000. $CQ ]c.c YGo isc ]co i 3 r .•. rJ j .+ j r fJ A3 N I i., i 'J ? M. C -I W I �N -1 •+ 1 a N N m ,rJ !-1 rJ 0` C.1 H M �.{"J }4 N. i r z � { C?L.1 0— 0 C .0 Pa 'n_nL'i rj ti W ti rJ -- W -io j-i V �i.+ :.•i :J •-+v - 0` -i'J i-i a p i m D D I D ! D A .. A j D 0 0 ol . oppy. o o c t o oo� c c ! o oy c � _ o i .T L*I M D m r!3 CL! o? j rJ I ? I W? W( 1 i Ia � ! � I 1 ! 7 W w W I A ( I A a A ! c w t, 0 I LR Cl W r L-1 I I 3 z L. i o 0 o j o b o I o V o c o c o o l o l 0 C o c o { 0 V i 'T i i I 1 fi i 1 I l I ! II I ! t f I 1 1 f ! D 'J ., N N fJ N 7J rJ [V T., fJ rJ V J j1 J 70 "J Wrj ! fJ i W rJ rri.:.• .+ I i a rJ 0- a a T _ I Ll 0`'V' V' ? { c 9 °•'' o { > I '�+-+ l] j Q O o o O o 0 I o 0 0 0 0 c I c T c c ! -n '10v L� c I o c I o c.0 0 c si c , c c i Vi i ^ O C O I c b A^. CD o Q oco o Q l c 0 0 0 0 j c c c o o i - o 1: 1 1 1 - I I I 4 1 t ! I O ! O PI m I m j m, , I; m n In m -9--? m -n ^; -,? j ;*± ., -rs z , f X X X x x x x _ X x x is x I X X I X X x x I E I 0 c c i o c c o 0 f a o 0 0 o j 0 i Q M _ _ 1 :l 0 7 G 'r Lr z.�'�: � is � I O W ! +- I Cn I z I Ll I CA L; f + V -1 f r M g m r• z i L'1 3 C -i M. -n z z z tt 'z+ �o � { z ! D - -n tv m I D ..i. .0 j Cl l U, ; s� o E rJ ro (A ;o _ z D . M, co vi7 t e r i 1 G ! 'y z £ CO C,•i TJ I1! v, � I y z e I _ i h A t4... 3 a > w U p 0 t4 W µ t. - to t% Lr, a~3 D ! a rJ �8'0 J fJ T 0` Qc ooI r^ �,,+• -T C'SL1 V sa :A C14 N V V L+t-n cQ oo V 3 Z a-,TI ooh CD aCD W W JrJ oo -.0 si V L"`_+! h7�: as Caul }0 v. Wa i ' 0 c o 0 0.c 1 fJ V f-�.c Ll Ln 0` p'.� {-•L4 rJ 10 Ln Lr.C4 r '0+-` s W W i W A (A I t+: It- CD t-o ,- µ O O o C b I G c l 3 2 0 ra Pi+� ± v ,10 CD CID_ r k10c z c c r m q. i I ± r � t z A c w [ r I-+ G I z 1. Z ;o M D} b D l in D - a 3 f+ I N - NI ( II l � a -.TJ I. l n � l x 1i � 11 ! i to ! cl c cc m0 x;c xlc s x sc -! = xe s pa 1 m 1 o Cj m CD f'l m T 4 fr ! I; k� o o ;K b x b C;b o I f'7 F� ^C C7 0 5 ± C m � o c 'T.o 0 7C o 7Cob 7C0 7C �.T�P .'coc o! z p Tb i.o b0 ! � M '*i r a ti.0 j -i ra u r,; -i a Ln -i C` J -+C --4('J (.>a w 1^z x j N I OCR O O±-• O O N O L --+w O LR O w :ia J ? ^u O J o u V o,I o a-V -#m V -1 L T, -?\V 13 W I m (^ 3 I ] r I I r r I r r r r r r r� CD �occ o =0 0 0 o o n -c c I i ± .i ? ± II I � ± I I I I I ,1 ,. I 1 ,1 I ? I i u t i is x j p ool7 o cp o ! o ^ ci op o fo 0' oc b p� oo oC i . M, C ± I n A-I D 3 - W W.'�ro rJ ...io o W W W, W�++' 0 (•il :A> �i ....� .> �:r,W W W ? O !!f _n o c Ln o LR kR •9 LR( ^j c oL" it 1 f !1 I + i I ± II II t f z C" 11 Io 0 0 0 0 oil o i O Oi 0i ob p b p + co b b OOc i 0 0 0 0 O p O C C O C C O O i C 0 0 0 0 0 O in O OCC o 00 O O O Oi Op O C C OC C 0 0 1= I I I I 1 W W`+J W W W W .l! ! N "J( ^J 1 fJ J W r r� ('J {'J J N J �' ^-s J^J ( 'JI o p r r'J I A A P > G:fl r D I .-.I LJ L1 `\ A± "J A y W Cr-07 Ll ? W.•o O c L 1 It jl t 11I I i i ?.. T} b LOCO 000 i7 ri; 00 ,_.- O -obo 1 - 00000 opo + ool of c P b c o0 c ooc 7.1 ± O O C C O O b c i CD m m T m m In lT rn ! m x xxXxxxx xxl x; x x X Dcx x x x p<xxXx i occ00000 I oo� of o{� (� p of _C 6000c i ICD CD =CD coo o ^i cl ob o c c oc o - 000cm O C O O C O O C I O I O b b O o Ji O O C i."C OO C ± 00 O CD 1=O , O C' c k O O O C I OO G O O P O ? ^ - IT' T 7C.T� .S�q � ^ r� .^.I -i� !tel L"� 'u � -F" .+ � J V fiJ,•� � , !V V\,NV �\ q zz1 Vj �JOnc}� I G N 'J rJ N N !"r -i --1 c! G,L �O �-i i.J _ V ..�\CO C4 1 Q t q CO.i q q m co rJ I ; V j m" a, ! i� � _Li - A -..: CA W LR ± - - I zzi w� r � i� nc mrn viui o m + ri a z x I m m m-I C? ^, I z Z rii + f i i I I{ I ' I i iFI yo y.' i 1 ;J i o ! Dj W i'J >� W=,: ca! > Yc r r - q c ; C I --'1 13'0 10 v v. .+q W o N I 'C o'-0 0 o bio T G «G -,JE. " U c I m Lrl o Cn t W o I W CR Cn .r•!�:- c .=0 V 1 W i 1 I I : t ct t t t t ,t t • t z rc i s z11 D � I cn a i w i rJ { T I • O O ( O I O C O I C O 1 3 zj J rJ CO rJ r J lI Q- Ji r J W - i 1 M `" iC, A :J Ql �0 9 i. C rJ w E V I f 1 i.. .0.0 I I t+ .� D ,~. in D � 0 1 'i I m ;o D m ;o I zIn 71 f 1 D m n v Ji r o j 1 , -� m ;a i z ! z m s . x D z I I i D I z U) z z f :r I s s (. x cn f --i -1 D o D D Z D z f ±-e 1-+ f z 7:Z D 3 Z z m ^ I v en m I G - z zi I n To-0 o n -0 n o c v 7-0 v v rl-0 I -0 i x n x�cc Sc � x c ,'t o o ,xc w sc xo x { c ! m it M �i I 1 ?7 1 1 I Trl I I ! m I ! m i I !! 1 1 1 znp o o n o tl a t7 0 0 oI a i mo3N v .. .Ja. .--4 to N N -i rJ -i rJ y :.+ u c ...i ._i 'r '�z I i V W ;J -i Cn. rJ 1 N Z •C 0 W W rJ 0 A ! O w 0 (A 0 10 C 0 Ca rJ 1 ;c n _ -i co +-! - ! w c -i co ,L' r) -- � ? ! m 00 oCa aobcooc a c { o coc ao o ! -If'?- � i ! J 1 1 I ! ! I f 3 I ! r" D D ; •. W rJ N-•a W .,J ! ? l .at ! rJ '� D _ o f O 0 Of ' i boa. o f opo j ocpoaco 0 o c i s ooc�c o boa I bOc of c cobo ;_ c c c I a c o c ' I I1 1 1 i I 1 ! I I I I. I J 1'JW rJ 'J rJ IJ "ilr f -JIJJN ! J 'J .J , � cc oac �'Jµ i J ^J ( 0 0 oI N J N'J r 'l] J J - •+ f DNA ? W W_a i fJ urjrJ rJ'J rJ ? V i ? i ^ C7 X00 0 ! abo a opc .J o o I c i o L1 c ac coa 1 '*! '!. t I j i IIi I I 1 I �I i j I I it I I ! 1 1 1 C�oLnI W I o✓✓ c i o bCocbo a I W 0 bo! o ! CD 0000000 �+JooW W obo oc ccbc o -'1 c j c I II I I I ! 1 ! r I 1 1 r It i I 1 i 0 I. 0 I �;;m m M. ' m frl ! m !-I -,+I?7 m m i --F. mr!1 fn .�m 1 7c7 Z x x X I X i x x I x X X x x x x X ix I X x i X � X x x x x x X ' -t { II I {{! I I if I I '! I _! 1 t1 ! O o a l c l o b c o o p o c b c o t I c o r n o c c i _ ' pool o c b c i o o c c o 0 0 o c o o b c o o co o l o (, a c c i o o b c o 0 o'o t:7- .0 c o 0 1 I NN JfJ fJ rJ rJ P 1 `J 1XXn � 7z ! >; '{"J CD 'n ! ZK z l Z I N v j '�"O - � zI z i ^ 1 ~_ --- - ! G -i I .' -i I C-iD z:a� 2 D i o00 oa o .. NA -'CI zi wto S 2 3a2m -n I Z i - I i = A ?A> >AA i r'! I to rn M ",m!"1 to UJ ,: ' yfT�l. t:tl C7 r1 -1 I I j ) UI(P, L7 MZ I -a .Ti i y -n I Z LVq.. --ix x x 1 G% D:'J r- 1 -t 7 ..'3 -' T3 1 ;c z ti n j ! f I r ri f • i 3 v ?acorn of r IM "I I rJ V � = ww 10 11; NooCD ; c I -� AV D`oI rJrJ1 ^ 03t.)L9 SoD.VrrJo �OW o I V r.r N ca Ln CP V:T ol.- ?? ►� i Z Ln LR A co tT c L". V W i7-? W "I.a A C b o ✓v.,, D Ln a J_ v>.I o I VI ooI .00jbL RV L0 V T"{)? A o 00. CCS Cc pC L40opc .rwa e • ` f � � � e e • • • e • e e r r � r � i i ..j «+ i_ r r r �•* i C W I ww Lt W W I i 0 0 0 0 c ^ I C m c l c I a i 3 z A CD W� co N CA CA W a, W I 1 w tv r 1 A r 3 t-+-+ Z z D I I m O r z -t z i I is T I (� z zrn z z I un :K t-t D :r ,� -•.: r l 1 w z z; r c o m c � � cf � i z x - z 1 1 m TC C!3 {( *7 { G -' D * Le) m { C'' G O 1Tcc T c Sc 2c' x S = 2p. x Sc i. c, �Oj T I I ffT?1 I 1 11 1 I ?': t 1 1 :, IMI i 1 m mi f! n o c a 0 7 0 7.c o t'3 ^ D C7 CI c [� O c c o '. 7 i CZ c ^, I m V - I-i N J P,)rJ -d J -i r,3 -i r -!E? -"+! P _y I m 'Z M <i W QV V V CD 11 G V0'1 O GN GN OA CR o H 9 V -i T I -i A --! ...c- -i D i D D v D D D D' D D ! 7 D D I I I v Il� ! 1 i � I F-� I .- LR i tF o o o 0 0 l c c c c o o a l a i V ON �_ I O o ! W W J I o >Li o IJ jA A o .�;j •.. A j f kJ G -' '2 j c. _ o I1 � 11 i i I I i I "t 1 'I II 1 it 1 'l if i I I I I z C'l i o 0 001 Oi o 0 0l o 0 0 c p o io O o 0 0 I c7 1 n > > i N J rJ r, rJ J J H J rJ C W W rJ 1 I I ! I f ! j I if 1 i jl 1 if I ( = I o a W Wj of of or= b kRO o o� - c I i ! +3 7n - jac - :� m ''I ! m m I _ i ;-!I'rt m r'! Gt' -^ :7; - m ?;i I po z... x xx: x i ci xX w X X 'XKxr x x; x 1 I I I I I t i t i I it I it jl. ! ! ! o o j 0 of of o co o b c F ^ o O! o 17 oo co, o cc o b c, c O cj � f -Ij I ( { n v n n! -;i -o �o !r � �:-t:- w I ! :,t i r C G C; m -G N I C U; .1 'J J 2 � - Z Z z 1 •t U; G; YI Gs} 9 00 { is T hG C I +� >i �G i n T!� IV r !� C ^�J D .r7 R! i i r+ a--+; r I •1, tV S.7 F, IWC r n _ -+.I �� I r i D -1 I zzj -1 - r� I n 7- j6 ;C of I r't I LO : cn co z z I ! m , T 1 If i z C; m 'rrn .1 'J n t { rA ? , t7 I I b o! � rh M I D' ( t i i I I H I 10 I i i i w J '' TJ CiCR CR v ul IT J C = I C_ A .fJ WSW CR KR op ` _r7 Vin Cr_ J ^ ti ! .rte +� -O VIiJ clo oc ciLo > ^� R' RI Ji o I I o �. o �:l *, c c W L)` W o r✓ oto [.R -_ CR Cl CR{ O i C -13- I f If t I _ D W . ' _ ? ' < rff '0 ; coI v ! F of EA rJ C 1 G Z i t Z Z I C_ S £ ( Z I Z i F U3 j G I D I VTI TI = 1 C :> 'j Z _ I ' N 1 i r ! H 1 t ; 17 -v -0 -0 -v n 'O �:. f C'3 "7 I C7 t C- F I in 7 n 1 c c S c c c hoc x - oo c = c1 x0 c =c m 0 CD E; a o f o p o o C'i o o. o C' .^. .'.1 0 o o z o o o p a o o z o c z �' ✓ "` ... �N fJ SCSJ fJ N 1 J 'J - i M�1 c fJ ra J -1 I rJ N I N IJ 0` L4 i-' -? I O-LI i -+ J. -+ --4 -!0` I -i ? ". Z m 07 O to ..�. . O OJ 03 t0 C1 07 O I A O _ '2 ! j O ...: A v . .O i F n C 0 O V ,AV L", L DI Tf i � O 0 o b o o C b e o 0 0 0 0 0 o o O b 0 0.P oa � oo� >~ oobooaoop00000P 000j j = t "' LJF ! I I ° }J I t I I I N !i - I t PJ Ni CI O -11 rl ! CX.W N o W N J no0Ln 000P0C0o00cCly A " D I •• i o _ t _ t t.7 O O Q O O O O 0 o p a o O a O p C O C a c b C o a,o O P C j o ! G"7 1 0oboo} ooabo 00o a{~ oobC op 4Dc o iI I I I 4 f I D 'J j J rJ fJ N N rJ('J !'J N fJ J f W N 'J J"J fJ to fJ N�J tJ rJ rJ j J J"J rJ rJ N rJ J to N N J N N tJ-PJ rJ J 'T fJ tJ N F' -+�+ J .J '.i ? C J J rJ fJ to N PJ J to rJ rJ to rJ rJ to rJ rJ to N N N SJ o V Oo POpbO OOO ObOOPO c00Ob "' OO I Oi O D 1 '! I I I !1 I I I' C) C:) ;5o cboot q PooQo oo Cocl A i ooC oob oo0 = bocP0000bo 4= a b r I D O p b 0 0 0 CD O b 0 C O P CD C j. "J 0 C D 0 0 ..: T I t it I 1 i 1 1 ? 11 1 ill I { I I ? i ! { F I t mmm^'! m� rn. mrnm m!''!m m „4, m!i 'Imm 'In -? r ^i M _' y F: Z II X I ? I X I ! 1 11 1 I ooOooP ba abc a>coo obo cb aacl of o i c i i O O Q O O O O c COC c b OCO i7 a cl c O ! oCcacc. bao0ocoCo CD CD c a of ? Oc a 0 fDOOb0 Oc.0 cpo DC'^O 0 O I J N fJ to N fJ jJ 1`13N�J PJ N to N N J N N{'J CTf„'�fa `"'W A � , ?•:i W A A A ALR 11'10 T,C!1 Lr LIC'CTI LR Cn L'1 'N0 m 'l I Si Z ; 0).0) W CO ^,,.)' to to to rJrJ ^J to"J N tJ rJ ^J to\ \co `I I . W W E+. W ' W H r.+ .+�.... .+C 01 O^C":71 01•01 0 0'-10 O z I -z -s, > L r j i C 0 0 to V '0 0- C- 0`.�-0` 0-ti V V V V V 0• V�.7 C r ! I ! �-•: mmmiD R C^.613mtom moo 11(11) z EAI - C �-O'D v -0r0 b'D .. Z ;!'0-5. j7 "I \ :gym ro ro-0 T !o -0 -o +0-0-n? Fc -�*v m-C!v� tH- —C - r� rr ra H!-+ H H H a~ H f✓ py r-+ M w:-+ r.?-+C m ,-;m;T! mm mm mm m mmm mm rT; ^^m-0L!t i-? fl 07 CA ir. m On po L^.m 000 _,Ci m NUN m m -0 V L; c > i !✓ W.CO N 4411 ...I `✓' .++'-` ! Ln .. I �+ .,,; o W W .�. i+ f C t I W ONLII A�,: HLA rJ � rJ F•' o IA"Q C4 to W0,•+ ai _ C^ 01: T T 1j . . . . . . . F _ j V ! - . . _ _ C14ACiuU07b t-ioC1 L^ Lrl h}m mW4 z D, NCb a17 V CR` o=.j A '! CO�uj - I w I t ^Jotu -0 ofr CL9,-+rJ ru z,m,-4 0"1 NIn [J _ 0, r' -.I o i o _: mco -14- a s r r r r r r r e r r c c c ' G4 W t+ x m 'r�J fJr-I• J is Y I i I i _ o °� t43N III i I ! I WO W J }QJ+ J 40 f rJ to � x' I i M - 3 I t. k M r i ! t7 O 7 17 O+ r I { S G71> Z ETI X I. t I -V v -0 n v v!c1 n :7 ,C7 (? c cc�ccz o Op x xc s sty xc x c ! c c I c c t rn { m I m 1 m l ?'I I 7n t I � 1 t 1 i a`.T: o o a c o ,o a c n C; C m m -I -) 0 (� i a ; 0 CD t r_ I b 7C 7C I O j Cc O I a I o + 1 :3: M C r') V N NN P GS o =i J -!�� -i ru 11'J i -+ 'J I N rJ I N ' CA _n_'1 N Ln n P A N O L4 O O O m O k,.l O( -.4 •+t w i (7 ,u V L r) J`L` -{1T r --i -1;A -i hC rJ i 3 D D D D D D E Y r.Y Ln..Y I Y r C x m I I I .I I I , '+ 1 11 ! I 1 :E E t I I it ! 1 r. + it I • 0 0.^.C O C b L'] O O O C O C O O C C C O L7 D - { O OOCO O OC Q O p0 0 O C Op oab OC O OC 1 'T'I r"; II I I I It I E I I S S IE E i I I ! i i i C� A �iD• Lt J fJ -JI C.L. .r!W W W L::4wW w E b0 , -' W" A of L'I �'i Ao nl pc � ... � oc ccc. + b c i M, C �, I Wt I J 1 it 1 r 1 1 E II I -i I i 'I Io :=oa0 i coo p p bo 0i oco ac �paop CO b 7 _ 0 ccco 0 oc p o o t�ca, aco co c0000c o a G _^. nJ 'J N N^J to 'J N {'J J �'J J rJ N rJ I N r. .j"I'J r.; rJ N r.. 'J r J J I � _I \ N rJ rJ N i J -' 3 to - r �J a ('J J ��Y.+( L9? '�A L', A C^L`, Z- tr, C _'l M. V V VV V V n+Y �t iD Ib to SCI "o f.,Y c('J oc -Jo 'J orJ i w --. V o =ooc oco b a J c0c ocaop -caoccccc ^ \ O,. a c000 o oo W p �gool occ ac� c000bc oO c I ^'F *• ?! i O C O O O C P C COO OCOOb O •= 0 1=oocc o oc � hJ hoc occ co c cc 0 occo oco Ll b rJool occ ooc co 0 oco ao o r -. r I I I it I t 'I I t I it li 'i ' i + I -1 I is 1 1 I E � I 1 1 I Q! m _nm ETI -i r.m ('T1 r-In In m . r- -n m zimr- 't '"i rn m ; x z - I xxXxx xxX �C X Ix �c XxxaxxxxiaxxxxxxXxxxx -t j it 11 1 0 oobc cio b c b lr- 0 001 ac ap c ocobco o I c Coco I o ob P - o Faac o. (;I 4. 0 0000 - 0 00 � p b COO OcOOD o Ob o OCO o0 .:= I i k'i �'J v, v:1) C"..C"'-,0�:. '0 is•i.-0-6�.c v^: -.0.0 C +):,2+ ( > Q L* trl W r' CO G O .:,ti .0 1 Z. P P ,. a,(A C.7 ! c m Zl -Z DDD D D DD D > D 1 O �. _\ \ \\\ \ H rJ rJ a o \ ! rTl ry l+ 't. Z z (Tt S C.. 0 C,. -� CA S v m m �-+ `TS Z. i 1--+F-t•-r r•-r t--�r-. I 'r! '-i Z Cn o'o o. I 3 V 1-r ID C7 i-i �H• D D D: z z z z z z I G�. r; } Z � b C c ^ zzZ Z�zz ; 3 \ I mm Jr i r i I I \ i r-Is I i ... � "( ee .. L I E 3 J _, V ?'J iso .-� 'J fJ I t* _n V x (A W 'J!•a ^'I" W I r)to o.T L4 I LP, A P flo © PIP P P co im _n LG Ln r v L.E m+-++ o .,,1 J Y w IJ ->T ..+ Z rm 1 \. V L.E _a m 0 o Io 3`C` o is - L - I `n n L n ~ IT.,".D Ol P cis o;a r J to oto V{'J'J W I tet: vi'r n C,a Y . ..:o m W ! I i f ( i i G � D ' u a D 10 : t, 1 91 -4 z Z 1i 1 i m 144 ! f C In I + ' ! ! z � 1 ? + a _ V70-0 -0 -a "a -,o n-t, �-J _- -v-0 v I ;o x x x x x x ccc—C c c c c c c 2ccccc ccc 1 i R1 ?I 1 rR I m II "rt I! ! ! p 1 ! ? "1 v np n n0 n i nboaca o0 0 0 ^.o ^y 7 C¢ C CD iT 7 C T. o 0 0 0 o o p o x p 7 c-yap _ coo ! 3:M J -?tJ --1 > -{fJ --i L` -.1(J. -i J r,) r'U rJ J rJ rJ rJ rJ "J --?rJ rJ NN V til N +Z < I O W O O Ln O qq�� O,o, O Ln Ln Ll A A A. A -i!+J -?0` -i i m 12 01 0 A "J • : D D D i D� T. D _ t _ frO b O O P O C b O O o 0 .O o ", =•�. O O O O ! o _ oc o b _, co cco _ oc _ =CZ b L� Nc- A0 9J - .b (+! J A .- �.I wfJ.J �.!,�J D N r "..J A A :�? ? a A t Q a-? ��Ln }' t o C4 4- c0 t o c :! I ! t I i I ! ! ? ! I 'I 1 ! I - ? t i z "...!' b - > 1. o p c.c o o c o= oo o 1 a b boo c o a b o c o p c o c c c -o c 1 - 1 '? J + ? t D J i.l r)?J rJ rJ to J OJ;' rJ J to 'J 'J J r r J rJ rJ J �A J ri }}+' w 'J o'J rJ r J fJ ro a tJ rJ J.J rJ'J j fJ "v iJ i 1n Y 7 ft. J.. ? p Cn. C` mmMCD CJ coA -3:3W co^..J �i tz o {.icoaoob I i t{ oc000001 .4 ? 1 � _. 1 fl �I 'ice III ii ? I I 't ? 't 3. '�+ . co�ocbrIr. i I ! I p p p Q o c c a o p c o c o b c c o a c c ? o D ooc000 ooaocbA ooc opo c_ c c i =i f �. to m m m mmmr.11Mi�mmmmmm m .mm ? �z IG K X >x XxXX.XXx XXX xXxxx i'" xxxxxxxx 1 --' i - o O bb b P C b O O o O C C O.O C C O b z "a z r A F� ^ caAapr,^ tea 0' 0-C- :7, c nm m 'Zmm;u I c ".i`cn fJ m m� -:. o o -�v _. v�m t •-+ N o +� ,- �•-•c-c7 rJ cr, b. o-C a cc D P A (ALr.rJ a C..A Lr 0 o c b >S c n.+ J^J wvo .0 oCo 'AA f z r✓ r. L? C tsh-`.. 1.L C,Y O tC i .,�:L'1 Ln L>t Lr Lr ..1 r - o a a o Li w Ir c o w WW w J w i 9 I z ^ oAw �C:'0v cAAA> .� rJ ? ? + I ? f tr zzzzzzzzzzzzz .zzz I � L, I i f I i fIz 14 i f Jro FA, a� ~+ W t7A + C I > W w O (V Ln�n c M «+L^ C I oo O.m oc A P cb VU-O rJL",Lr op.D` LnCO v vCC. LnP _^C` Lr, CO;.+•-•ow1OJ z i I _ ob o cb A> op mb,..o -..(,.1.w N�,)c,W Amm, oC ul cb oP co .+ cc }N V A rJ V b PPo .O cC!. m ^^L Lnr)?c .,W m ! -112- ♦ • ♦ ♦ • 1 ♦ ♦ t_ t t _ t t t t t t f f t ' i C -' I (7 i i 1 71 z >µ DM. t I z 1 m i z I tz i x i m i i c , I i , ! z I r j l m I I I ! I I If t Z 'r - m Tcb. i'i cl c "" c o b I Cm - .. to C j p rJ r• ..i I rJ I r) N! N i m. z x -G "n .D %m C3, 4a tet? .4,I 4. 1 .2' C; iI Cri rJ -4 i - l i r,7 - Im o o c c o T o c o c c a c t m f -q I I SA oc Ro o CD o �c _ of -ob cc - o I o o c c 1 o c a c o c c t C A I 1 it I t t t 1 'I I D IDI WpJtr cm C4 1 cCD . I C4= �a:.c L-1 -i : O - "'i A_(j ` i _ C I t i I i i I 1 7 1 i t I D i I oN r r± JI r J 3r ± Jto ,' 1 W W _ r ri 7j! t 'V i%5.r ±r fJ i Q L1 D l a r� ± J i ±f rJ J r r 3 W _ O C - O C CI 0 C C C ^ a0 OOC.0 >ri� 1. .'iT -{ OO b O OC 01 OC O CF C OOO 1 `-Y m t, C z I j I D XX x-xx XX! XXX XXX XXX i N I i 1 1 ii t i i 1 I I o b R= c co c l c c o c 1 I � - I D cc Rc Deco! ccccococ U7 - - ( c o c c c V of o 0 0 o c c c o c 1 701 D c c b o c c o a o c c o p o i to rJ i- t,. WWi..!W co oc = cm G t { I i � "Ti �� �-+ •--•.- .-. .-.I c o a c = c R .r; 1 t-+ i. I f f7 S co r± " rJ.rJ U m m m L.w 1 , ?I( 0O L Lt L' i TJ 7 i 4 rj G7 r I j ! i I T 1 W L'i W N m'J .+r _! v r _ �. rJW ea t z mi I D o c A rJ'r ta,w W, 0 1 j o 00o Tvv �L�v �l ...N V , - v Cr t 1 { i 1 C it t t t t t t t E E E E C E E C C f C C C j z' 0 o to a ca A w ril c z c -- .. c CD c c a a o o ,p co ..a a co m - A r) Cr LT! w O n n w ti D 'Ti D ;o Q m r-T C*) D r In rn In 0 W T. D D Z '• ^-t x r -c z cn x T 3 n ?i L7 *S z I z zi z D r 1 - -t z Z z 01) m D m D -c -i m -i. D. n c m D z z 1c) G t=j - !n � 3 ME r, c xc xc xc xc 0 xc x o xcccGCIC GCG c xG _I -1 _ 1 m 1 M. i �i F'1 1 -r 1 m 1 m ! a na nc -,c na ^c nc ^o f7 c t cac o oac ^ta ocm C: ra w Lr; -i(,�. �^ -i w -!W I - �C, -!!x -i 0 -i W W I W w W CA W CA (<W -+:W -� -"Z -C V o V i C 0 Lrif I 014 c m 01.1 c.._II C 0 L'! 0vM In - a -!-0 --f A -1 V -'co I -{ W i A V I T AGF. D D D D D D D D D DI o o a c o c c c aoo ooc aoaT o c o � a o c of as o { aala coQla Ia _ ;;D ��T o a o o c Q cc c !a c ojc ;o '� ^-'_a • rIJ� 1 I ' 71 rq LTi Lr i W o .+ Q cl.� c I W aio :.. WIC z I c D ' o o a o c cqc acl.= o. ooc,� {c -+ CD C O C C O C C j Q CD O O Q a O I C Q QIV V a^ ^J=I= CIC IQ G— _ M a O O a Q OI a I p IC 0 C O i !j I 1 1 D ~n rJ rJ rJ rJ IN N I 1710 Fil '., f .. .J r �'t ,il 1.J'J ra r';3 ,rJ ,.i _ \ .J o o .tij 'il I AAA I .,+'W w ICAW CTif:a1 !rJ ! :1 -D 7a N rJ N-j O o o a cl c m c c coc cao _.coQia ',.•. �j i o c a cl. c c o aac o cc a jc - c S1 � M m T. m _j rn 0( m " M m T. T ia,Z m m M.-i i j t f N, x x x{ G x. x -((( x x x 'x x x x xix x xlx Ix x x -i ' f I I I , } 11 1 ! [ - t i 1 I I 1111 i tit II ' ff lc--D c 0 a c o' a o cl cl ola a I o a a s ala c Q o a Q oI cl of c( a a o^Ic opo Q a to !o a 7. o c c c a cl o{ [(1 cla c o a a a aja cjo a fo I I n 3 w .+ r M w. :"1_'E ra\ C Mo A'. _ -..I � G 1 ! i w-1: W W 00 CA D :" J � Z! Z 3 1 W Z z -i -q N rJ A 1 A -Q IA A A A IZ '-u GI - -! 'S m rJ y .-y z -A«V ! a a a�A CA F j Ic r, IV Z V� D A Q c,c o c,o x i- m �I J CA D I1zI aVrl ;!I -z m C a J I C 1 ._. IQ O ....I Q ,z Ik H m -I nx I ADD ^D`Es E a z. I m D .41I j L --1 i D DD 3 zinz { z z z Izzz I c - ! I -1 Ii z. -11 0 0 I I I i ;a I h IIII r S -o0.0- CA I.. L i -'j14 FJ A rJ f J A'.Ln rJ W :•Q7 rvt_" R _ o LAI i~Cl• Lq L cl :u ,,r j W L4 0 o O'.,,;>LL ..-j _ 3A rJio SIV �v Z; iT7 . 0 0 0l o m co o a c A A V V W Cr A W o c�;T o.-IV c WIZ- C 10- Ln,Ln LR LR A A rJ.^cow Q• rJIFJ V'c -- t I - =o a ola L'T o u m uln o .c o `Iz W W W W W W W i W W ( =i 3 -7. -C I. 01o I m V - 0` C4 A W iV N V A V :k tT• `0 m 10 4-7 Tt CSI Ct3 TI i'3 Cy z3> 0 CS3 1-1 C'3 W _ G : z r D z ...( i z cr G z ;n F ±1 #I c ^ 2 G S 0 G � S C 3 2 G =O TGG rJ" 1 G i 11 i i -# I 7r. 1 ; :1 _ I _ E T 1 -.E 1 1 1 { c�z t..e� 0 0 . c r3 o a 7 a C^o o c- a Com,. o�� 1 - o c X c c fJ'N ill iJ �' `J •+. su �J .( f ._� j x c. .r W -± N t' -i _r -±IW -i W W -I W -#ii N z 10 .1 O.L� � ^•„a. .0 G _r �j :�r. L� � L4 C ^ _ o c c oca oc co .:aoac a o ! cl � - A A W W WIW aocao t'JNNfJ'J a A . IDIA v:W i ul! ! `EIun C c O a CI O a O O�C O OI O O OI c O O I a O �"•3" I #� Y M.�! OO O 0....1G CO raa A�aaaO O O � a !O °iG c0 O OCO OCcO 1 I i 1 ! ^J ` 1'J P ['J .- - rJ fJ f:. N 'il I W ro"J L C•al t'J rJ r J;N'J'j^' 0• `iv J "J !r' ( ,-•. ! D' A A 1 A AAiA iJY o o a ca 1'J iJ C:IW N acoac IA c !oc c.c(c c `� Lr = o W.C�.I W a o c�o o a a a o cc a ccia occ�oo W!W v:WW a c loa c 'o iJ 'J o fJ'ail N c a ct o o L9.'1 Ln ! f 1 I !I ! I ! � i f ! E„ ,± sr1 ,ate �xzyti� mnmm -t mm - z XX X Xi!IX GGgGG C X(XXXX G X lXX xXX IXXX _ O O O O CiO 00 Oa i •=r O O O 'aa 00 O � t{ cc `. a eja cccjco acccc a ico aIc _! c o a o oIo o o a o c�a c a c o c c a � c oIa i .i Cr ul CR 70 7 z;o ,:v 7 - ; m W Lia VVI R �7 t L�'CR"'t ' -i--� rt � D 3> \.i C LL !1 G 1 v CR A A A " -�C CP1 EnU3 r r •n ^i zz z z til _ I C7 u 'Lt ri�'a tv d C CJ !C'3 C'l n O •`'w z ^') \ - �• M rpt A :1D:r J J I z rZ I"' m;Q 77 77-1 £�z 33:2333 I tcL i J AI 0 o o -0 'J G C D; J Lit I c A - W IfJ i'J C W�4 W. YCr V= w. 0`P' is c ..'3A- .-�:-tel:' C.3A.-.�. }lZ 'r iJ V cc±o ^Jc o�oa o o c W A 0]W Ln V L4 Lr .,.. o C:4.p N .1-1) t Z _ J I> W W W w CA W W W - CA W W i ' i3 ca l+ w ti a m m v c m Iz c . Co CJ Co Ca N Ca CJ ^J Co m m CJ .p y W W A CJi W 1> - o I a iil Aw V 'a T W Cl 10 Cr :^J # I M 3 n S ! G H m in C ,:t m - m c -� z C D D 1 "! v _ ,Tl - z S T i 1. -Ja 3 t C 71 z rs = r z 771+ D r ..i r D ;7 D CI z '1 M F. °-m,. z r a A. Z i. z z z 3 r n t-t D yc A tri. 7 'C! V�. z t M. '. C m m D ;ta C -f z �: -D -1 Gi I MI 7111 :x r- z z x ! m 0 71 .• D I Zz t Z r T ! n I 1 ! � I I Cfi z I t E -o n C; C:-o n 0-C C' .,j :7 I IM < S< 2 C. S G T S G G S G =< S G S c S G 3: S G F m I t "4 11 - I - i r 1 ' i ir`-. r-+ n a m e C3 0 C' C i a ^..-.i ^J E a .To o a i.o 7Ca :[o T.a na T.a T. T.a I X^E x { I I3 Im -4'' -+W Csl ^` --!w -t W -!W Ca:E -i W -Jf.TI -i C>t -! ,J.t I -#Ca;; --i CA I V Cf P ^i'# C� .-+ c w t7 D. O:y C.C C vI. 0 -4 C ! 0.'^J�. -+ ,:=� C.?` C i W -y I c --('J` •+ --t O -i N -#o S! -! -J I -f C!': i .-t^' v # r D I D j D r r r r r r r r r r r r - i m CD CD t '>. . n C;o I '. W CJ. :.. D D .A A CJ 10� a o, w1 rj 1 W( ^' 1 C '7 =j VII (� C M 9 •; i "il W ,.. i� � _ C,. I p j rJ -.; I .,t 1: ._ C� J D tJ L a c i I a; C it a 1i. a +� CA WI ;rt, [ ! + riI GI m !� M m -1 m r; _i m =.� :.i r: I f !�:c. m i s . X x x x x x x, x xj c ; , x .xj x x x t I~ f Icctj C. T. -G C+'I m z 4 CI T' C'J z,. C, C f '�; C _ rt tit H < ZI. A - z 3 Z Zi tp --i� 1 "i T m ;;676 76 n -n m m Z I -VI ,I SII 21. .�' C I, D ICIO '71 FT1 + °T#m,. ^I GIti A xxxI' X,J ':! -� r� I f 1 i EZ. Fo `. I ! ( I I 1 \ � ` I ► f I v 'J J JI>.. A A A!a µ t? I s� I tic CJ L7. L't -I CA .: v"', CI c .•� u:W zui a -C. ! v !+Ij LT 'I v4 c� . UI CJE col4 b � col C9 0 , 'C� ao ccI JM 07,T! wv oCI ' 1!z T! ! I ^ r r r r E t e st E r r r r r r r r r r t t I i a z 'o 0` V LO 00 iJ.. ^J tJ A. ^� J fJ o Ja A fJ V CR s ^0 !! �R AI L•l •s E z z x X 0 D D zu I Q D z Q iA ^ -< _ z 17Q s r D D C Z D 1 ZD M 71 0 r Q y i e 11 z m z c 1 T m .. D u ,u y i W X I iA m m - y � 1 ' C7 "c C1-v n -O n-o n -J n„ ^, C7-C'0 ,. ^ 1 "i i .�. I f-11 i -! I 'n I 'i I I T ! _ t '' i t ?# i t -fi ! ? ! : i _ s -[ t. Z T. (•7c a C3 a 7.01 ,00 C'c+ ^, f ^' [ C " 7 C O Al a •iT o x a .T O I o ST. .T. c 7z z%=j I Fin, ^-i zl m -CI Q A 10-0 0 0-0 G I O..q ^^u Q+-` Yk :1 Q"ri Q'R•.•>�� v' :�k,� :± i, .1 -" A --t SO .. --+ TI -F D`.:`: A ( •� ri _ 4 t I !f c a a c cl cl I r => I I i -i D mDl. iJ r fJ r 1 iJ W I ^0 AAI r'i.i w&,l A c v^,A J Ai i 1 'R 'R 'R CR Li c �i _ c col - A! 'Rf i I ,. •^ - '-il I Z zv M a a a c I a o cl al arc i 1 �` i cD6 OI 10 :=1 a JI I I C c l m a-It "J I W iJ r� ;J I V "J f fJ �J!1i iall ti fu' fJ 10 . ,, 01 'fJ L'. Q`! .+ y i .•y- T o LR o I a c o...I a o of ~ I\ •C ;j a i I. -": \ C m c 0 _, a c a o of o c o: q c oI ._.• cl i � D c ^ o ! o W ! I i I _I I .i j i I i CD • D� 1 m m •;rl m If m i-s-,` M. rT, -?l :. :! m+ I Iz z X X XX X X X XI - x X X X 1XI X x XI X X! -? 0 o cD : i 0, r r C i t--i -n A! �.,r..-.i ,..1 ,::t C"> 31 I r LR z 0 z to T o a y1 =7 L3 3 -D -) -Z D I z I r C z 1! £ £-I. zl ^Lr C!m :K Z Tj f T z m 1 D - l cr m , a - m `I r cl zi xi i W Z F� q11 z ^y z l #I O = IrF z N }"y i I i i I I I I I it 1 E• ^�^` i v'F I^� `•� A A to •Pr CN��:,. �� «*1 2 A �^ ". I o _. A A ^ ^ I� V .+ o.-.j .+ . I n u'-� a.A+o ^:•.� A.� P 'J `I= G7i. A mi E LRsfJ fJ LR f a, a a Cl o ac cc1 I I I V Y � I W w w w v cr� v { N a o o "Q t. ! C 3 'O 'C z C # O E.�c - z o U7 a o n z D 'M £ t S :12 I l 0 z t M - t M t z - { 7 I t 10 E7 { I EI ' I E t T r S =c = coo =c - cc cccccccccc =ccccc is o Yc sc { I C7c ^I moo a cmc -+.W -i cr,01^ -.113, -{W W W W wlW W.WIw w(A CA -?W .a{W W C. I-!w -+ !-i a. '3I u..S 4 Ir, -mO D 10 W W w r "J ru :D N1 N.r I'30 r 10 01 Z11A V i71 ....#-;. ....i =.�-Lr .L4 -I w A w NW til `0c Nil o I n A ted. 3,-+ I-'i co -± �-i -5 _, � _� I DT- D ( 1>1 ,� D D ID , c o olo a a oC o a c o o cja o c c o c oIa c c o - 1 , ✓- JI --.+ - -LA - Ir r,..#- - V 1 I 1 i I I ! I i I t I Eli ± i 1 1 ! t o a r o 0 o cIc c o c a c•c a o o a'^_ i o ! c i -.� (,w ( I A A .a A .rl�r3 W r3 r ^J r31A A.r. IA A ri:A A I. W A I A A-A A ! Ec. „s { �. '�, .. ,� ..+ a i c L'I o f n o vt I� :�. "+•� A LR A ! ,•-'• -, r - # +-a-i.I I i i - 'J ru rill rJ rJ "J !rJ r„rc.r :. rJ ru TOJ 3 ! rJ J ! 1 i \ ', r r371) c+I,Vc 5 ^' rJ J t-0 Zi ril j Iu it J ,I i .7 tI A ' \ 'c ^DA I� t� t l � ! - i W O O a '^ a �a O ^...OILn ^>a.^ �^O C Q W a '( o ac c c c o c!a a s c o;o �ojo o alo o a c c - I D a o _ o;a a-c c ala a a•a a s alo c o c i o I I �j. -3. Y' •O a C c A arc c o c;A c c c - o ..r o a o w •-� o .J I 1 1 m;-1- m m. --( M, ?I I ; z` z_ s I x x XIX X - x x xlx x.x x x x x X X X x X X,X x x x X X X X I - 1 I ± Ia a a1 a c { s �a o aoa c occaoac aoo coc caaoo a -J � c --:o � IjV I. ^. rb V W Id A.A A A I :co co� m 1 C rJ''-i v .^, 1 10, r Ln C':LFI r', 0 10 0 -W +•rs 71" W 0 C\,\, t: z rJ^'•�A rJ el 0- 31 x z zip - z v. c,..Dt CA -{ _9 \zlc V L.. r a A W (A nlw C�fJ a C` ,^1. ,Iw z -ri p�'\ •-` W v�I v.s! C v.c!W IAA rol .•' rjj 11 .I I I I I i ,I I. I,_. Q.of�R o I .-{ z I -r# 1 o LF! („^Ip*' rJ co W W rJl {t �. I Z t .- i U' r! '^ (r.\+'.� C IZ { J w .+ .r, r a 1 z ,T D I ` y Y I D .--1(-,I ,) .2': �C 10 u \ '4 A T I{nt :T I � ^} 1. n I c- '1 D t ' ! :\ I i- �'1 I\ D t I. J ZI u r1 - -i D J mi TV i -{zI- II- z Lzzz-zzziz iii i I I I i i � I I I j J i rJ I w I !J I J s D L4I L7 OI "•Y.I i A '^fJ lil ri T rJ - Z. -L' # w AIA co 0 V v V rJ�3 w e t7J n*'{I L'� •=mac.w L�:'\ j T Q` �_�;� �-J a I v v Z o c J Q AI u7 �I W L^ _i Lh W W w wl W W Wj W c{ 3 AI fJ w I o C rj rJ L'I A .L`o I o i j I f C ,-..+ ,G A .. i^,"V co im C-0::I-^''1 Z s V:I v --c L^s{Wi V la Q Lr L, IC'!o I { r a —21 I 1 �f.. W W �.' W W W � W j 3 - •.�' I I I. o "M I { i 1 ! 00 W W W W 'W (.€ 0Ml CO o W W W v co T CI V T -rJ W rJ _ A tet) c 10 V W Ci o Im A T •�. e ..�. 4 U7 CA tTI Ci LA C' En m z 3 ! 2 z D -+ z D. 3 --I ^. z Z z •- Cn 1 III : _:m - u i C f1 N D D 0tz m M M. m r3 Dci - f-j v T> -t z z { { z ;;z UO T € u7 z :K z - M. N r n m t � 0 TI € f z tr. {{ f 4 1 if M t < 2�G 0 2 0 T < 2'C 2 J 2 < 2 2 00 < y<;< 1 : z < "_< 1 m ! _ €I f } '•E I -'3! !Tt I : 1 T# ! _ f t 1 - I t t oc - C'7o ^cl ;Ci n ": c,adJ C'.�I . f cc ^a t c o ^ 0 7C•a n cl .7Z c- CI X T.:- 7:c .� r*I �C4 -ni �r I Q`. -1 nl -4 -..4 "< lZ- cr ED rn A A A --�'v -' 'I -1 -€iJ' .-t113 -: I ^•e, �t -- wZ w^ " t D D D D D D I D D D ! D ID y I r L'. c o 0 0 0 0l o vk cl o o� a� .r I s s t i I t I } 1 ! I I WI D rn D: W 0 W W W A _ r D•A Ss cA I 1 -+ i! f O O C a 0 O � Cf O C CI I< .L` f•. TTI r ?i �7 Lr. <, W ! c 1 TI o a s r. I o o of r .,•t `t I 1 ( 1 I t ( .I t II t € .tl €.l X X X X X X�l: X. ?i) Xi X X>< -j XX X I X f ' � C oo Cd � CI -looms •00 1.^ r. . . '`" 'T Z, m r� Di CI o - I E I z z _ A a z t' t) ti z z I Z i < T. LQ .J D D ITi I _ i } C-1 iD Z 00 �! yz Z-I s_ _ fi= ti z � I I CD •-'".• W - i J rJ » to tF +Pr '. 2- J �'I ? A •-` Z' ��? C*1"1 A o �1 S Lil Y n W' A�7 V Ct r• `� A D v f I_ �n C-1 rA A..:q1 ... .-�ti o �i a:� S,al .. y _'y "I I•c•5 1!Z o. c o a CI Gs W•-°.-7 W c ci. o o ! o A;,j rJ 0 o c C:w u Ci A v L4 i ' C� c o A =�v9 a V. �i W Ic.� — O � � U � :. N - � to ✓I w ^+ �J J I T— .. _. z 7 M D ro P A a CD a a W W W{ W I i �. rJ O T V f G L•i N r _ z "C` - < I z f -C -1 z - 9 O 2 0, M I i. :K M £ r fn z -i { m C"t z. v Z, z j r^ ... I. 1 i � 1 i ,^.-O n -D i; -(7 0-0 C^T i, C-:-"-.-_,J n_0 r < G G O Q 2 G S G2 ` G S G S GIG --S.G G G G �a w -!Cit -f W - i -#.,: W x CW W�: -i�3 '1 i, f A a � � , O W O W 0 a, A -0 w I � 1:. " o C„i W v Oq l a 1 C -:1 -i--o -'i V - W _u -a L \T V. 7 D D X': oo^oco oiocc a o aac _; o q c�cl tl I Ij : oakaoa oaa cal c C Coo. ca' o jQa ! i t 'TI �. 1 i iftt! 1-II i I "I W A:.4I J U+-�o J f�.l W.W c W JIa A A fJ a A W I"il iC4 v. t 2 -i '"3 Lrlr, W ) -,.ICla? 1. i I 1 i I I 1 i s ! i t i� 1 i I Z ooc oocoaoao c claaacC aIC coi t -'D alo c N Pj ro I i rJ rd t.^ r,;ril u ^J k J fJ J ro i'J ri r,r..) r c•!ril til J IN ro ril (-- *+ •V ,�- ri I D--. N r .J kJ il"Ji' O COO aIp OCOOa C aI0�000a - CI �a as I { 1 \ (ii W. c'o a cic c o. WI a o o._,! r .J. *"!+ cQcc ,-,• oa -ICO I fr,ki rl r't T - -f ifCk'i s i -!�'•� ;?i ;m -+.� -1I ;�"• i I,u 1 �I j xXxxXxxxXIX x"x X X XIX xKXxX, XI •xix XXXI X. X I j I I. I iICl I I I I i II I i I i 1 ' I I I, I i ! 1 1 ( ! I I I i i , I i I I f t ' s I o a i 70 ^ cjcc al..�a o�c o a ^�. o oda c o(o o al; ci ja coal I F ( 3 ( , r '0IIV r rut J J .I ril rJ :K �3 Y I cf C' "I�" Io o cI i !V I �. U. L UICI C^C C'i LT,Ll A,-q �:) Ci cta^., c c,c z - a z .a,a,� I a,: z .-I� .. a >; ! i I<- I f ,n1 LW.,j.v. c^C i T E -i 'J k^J ro 'ro u Lit i C; I�C:�'�u 1 L' I co t.,..W M M:! W I V C't - W t W W C4I r I -O T,��� -rl rJ" tT P II`. �t DIA -I �-1rn m r-.m-t rs,+j sit w w "r' �,k-CI v7 r-mac,� t.l v:v. I .-ss! 1 l .;t . yzzzzl r r - z I. D '{I) { CJ N -_: T� �u I`` I Di z!. i I r j M to IU) 11 �.j "''r z(z z D ti+ =t Ic o c c �-e V!V ^ I \ \\ 0 I ,t-) I� "J +; :C w. D D: I G.., ;"J y i DD D.D D T>11:> n c.+ I - DI lCr7 C T� D U-3 D (^ I z' t .x+i r., •-,y r. D tri rvi -i - I� z ^i y I -M: 'M"n t1 . i,-. i' i-t.,•i!-; rj0 :]D Df ;' c1 i k ; l I cr: ncntri__ zi Zzzzzzzj z;z Icn... �i -,,: aI 1 , . f t i � I i IIz I : i I 'z !j JI ( I ly I .,� u :.a� aak�C, :�.Af� V ".l "Cf, �.;\iN Ica,Ca w rJ N Vf,. 0 Q'WI -C 00 a�; o ci c v�L��C ral a w -cl c' ,o -x -01L'I J Vi 0-' a I� {: i C7 u 'ao ��u` C�. a WC�WWW!aW=I oo ,i.�1;J tT Wi ooroc' t I.. i .c: C-- v ai a ca1YJv, i o aal a!a a=a - o _ 't { I I f Iz cnla D� a z a a i „ — i a A a a 'Si C N z z 4. MI C G 4 D 1 z 4 c n -t ro C-) -V J -0 -0 -.0 ;o t t f - E , i3 = cl G G G G ! ?1 Ix ?4 1 -E f 4 ^I ,'4 , 1 71 i i iI i e i t z 7.1 C3H -..,� W W -i -W CA w! w w W -� I .goo ooc+oo c 000e ooQ jc o o et'^ .L)P'! t fi ! IIt ! lfi41 -- c Qo fI I tocol I� oo o o.- I D � c oc. oca f ! i ii ! I ! VI , i li i i ! t f fli tI M.3>1 J a W a JCJ `Oo c CA - a W iJ t _ ,I r7 of oo�ao co ccoo oo^ioc :oo c oc ,I -E -i Di M tnt J , inE I CJ r r„ J C CJ.+ J Jf f• .j^� V ,J ' J f J �. DI CJ tV r :fJ r.."J J ro CJ of c o 0 0 0i C! it ! I 1 ! t I I f ! 4 e! ! , 1 1 `i l !j f o co o'oc cico o aoco Qc ' � ;: ,J 3 I' i h1t X x x x x xi N x X x'x x x .X N x�{ x x X XIX x X xjI < �C f 41 =i .moo^ oc ocoaolo o .�--,ocla .� c i c i iI gm - � _ ob oo.c'cc Qcic C� "J r -CJ f-I,J CJ r� r 0 rJ i J f CJ ril J FV; ! -9'l CSI_ r-Ci rl La C`1 C."Ca 0`� CI"r^:, ii -i0 'Al I Lr;Cn_: fIz w I i.G (A 1,14 C4 C4 w r'C,. waai3, y.Jaa+A -^ i CO C.-- : � fIG ¢ - ✓F w W ::4 3.� CA G a i. .w II'„M 711 z"l t x 17 4'T'i -1-I D D 7 '`,D D�D ' -i 11-r 4 -Y -,+ z �' z2.z C C C'yC JD '^ ��] f cI fn 'n Lo Zw z z ZI Z z Z z z z z I f I c�c Iu',cnC'I;nu, , u) ^Ifor-r'r ; r 1 i C I 1 G v 'I CJ " W Ln A.0 r. V w +-, w.+. ..I o .? 0`+a=J 'J i Cl 0rJ A o o Lrl -n -G N o r A W co C J wd CJ Q rJ C -0 `a:Cl �3 C, G.?i•+ 4 PAID LISTING February 1, 1982 to February 28, 1982 Payroll dated 02/10/82, Checks 7900-7972 $ 36,353.24 Payroll dated 02/24/82, Checks 7973-8046 36,230 27 Michele Reynolds Additional Payroll 7250 93.82 Mid-State Bank LAIF Deposit P2522 100 ,000 .00 Mid-State Bank LAIF Deposit P2537 50 ,000.00 Void Check 13095 Check Reg. dated 2/17/82, Pg. 2 ( 410 .60) Void Check 12978 Check Reg. dated 1/29/82, Pg. l ( 286.20) Void Check 12891 Check Reg. dated 12/31/81, Pg. 6 ( 43. 04) Void Check 13220 Check Reg. dated 2/26/82, Pg. 6 ( 9 ,586.17) Check previously stated as voided 71.34 TOTAL $212,422.66 1 -25- CITY OF ATASCADERO TREASURER'S REPORT February 1, 1982 to February 28, 1982 I , RALPH H. DOWELL, JR. , do hereby certify and declare that the demands enumerated and referred to in the foregoing register are accurate and just claims against the City and that there are funds available for payment thereof in the City Treasury. Dated: March 3, 1982 i RALPH H. DOWELL, JR. Finance Director APPROVED: MURRAY WARDEN CVty manager -26- M E M O R A N D U M TO: CITY MANAGER March 2, 1982 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR - I SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF TRACT MAP AT 810227:1 LOCATION: 9525 and 9550 -E1 Parque (Lot 18, Block JC) APPLICANT Edward and Judy Young (Poler) On June 8, 1981 the City Council approved tentative Tract Map AT 810227:1 creating a two unit air space condominium conversion, subject to certain conditions and in concurrence with the recommendation of the Planning Commission. The zoning is R-A and the General Plan designation is Moderate Density Single Family Residential. Staff review has determined that all con- ditions of approval have been met. On March 1, 1982 the Final Map was reviewed by the Planning Commission and recommended for acceptance. Irf LAWRENCE STEVENS MU RAY L WARDEN Planning Director Ciky Ma ager /Ps • LOT f//�� -�+ /L C Y `K.a' .�s+?+ �Y"s*ti rF ; n` *u.,�'S,�hF`f.R'St*d s'Y•7.,.:'>. � L OJ IS. a q x�e;.l �.�°a5?N�.*�':�t,z4y.dr���-�.�SPi�9ti�r y"•Y t l��ry • C W 2i No7&g) ou t 9�I 153 N30'02�G10'E ! ( 190.00,(R) N 30'03'33"E /49.7 'L)W� 74.69'(M) 7410'(A4) (M) 75.00'(R) ' 75.00'(R) ,�f o i0 20 40 , �a�' ec, 8m-�'i z '..yr.{a-r- i..m.rs., •.+�t�i+r,."3�-.• PARCEL ,o Gross Area 12,169 2 Sq-ft Net Area 10,671.4 S .f t. a b- W. 'tf L O r I r t Ly h 0 O b J C ..aY�.� �, t.sem lv"•�� � 3 ..y 0 � Tom_•- q - „. k.;�.`"�i-iv.�S•ei��Jt��$7�,•"d�rc`e�,= �-r.- '�s�wr' s 45►76) N30'Oe 00~E 74.69'(M) NN _` I - (` .;h�.tro,-sir..�.°^.•�`x...'+,..lzl9T�2,�'s.'.,abs'-�S �.I:'�..�' I ,, �O"� '°�.°+•a+'r :.. a "'�0 1 a + #v � -� �x+.�� Q b �s,-�.. ryna' -`�'a^:�+,^, t..•.. ..-�J b ,.a,„ ,a�! ,. 7. ',►• < w �,:-�f a � � x SSE„a°'a..>"a�z 4 d„� �,�y- x rg...°.-.. ��`°` ; . �� so Sk4 ntw IN .x. 1 w' � �" 'T^'.k°'t.'t�ty,Nr';.3'a v •-•y:r4 b.: 74.89(M) 75.00'(R) _ ( 173.00'(R � Y,`S- S+cr 1i`A„'z"'S N30'02'00"E (R�'M) 2489'(M) : °. f� M � w �C' F 7. 248.00`(R) ,�� + EL `x PA RW UE ,� (forinerl AMAPOsi AYE. .,�. ".: '., _:. .``�.''. �..r�, 14"sl•�n2 '�"�r4a...� ^E'Y`.+Sf�MFR�a'` y , EL PAR 4 UE HOMES PARCEL MAP AT 8/-2/8 _ A l-lot Parcel Map estab/shing the boundary of a 2-unit Condominium in the City.of Atascadero, Stotp of California. 8einq a subdivision of Loi 18, Block JC of Atascadero as said 10i is shown On map recorded in Book 4 of Maps at Page 56A in Me office of the Couniy Recordee, County of San Luis Obispo, said parcel lying within the City of Atascadero, coniablinq 0.2 79 Acras. E ✓, • M E M O R A N D U M TO: CITY MANAGER March 2, 1982 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT ACCEPTANCE OF PARCEL MAP AT 810420 :1 LOCATION: Santa. Lucia and Cencerro Road (Lots 13-17, 29, 30 of Block 85 and Lots 13-17 of Block 57) APPLICANT: Tenneco _(Twin Cities Engineering) On August 11, 1981 the City Council approved Tentative Parcel Map AT 810420: 1 which realignsportions of Santa Lucia and Cencerro Roads and adjusts certain lot lines, subject to certain conditions and in • concurrence with the recommendation of; the Planning Commission. The zoning is A-1-BV-5 and the General Plan designation is Suburban Single Family Residential. Staff review has determined that all con- ditions of approval have been met. On March 1,; 1982 the Final Map was reviewed by the Planning Commission and recommended for acceptance. LAWRENCE STEVENS M C Y 'L WARDEN Planning Director Ci Ma ager 1 QJ oo n N� `' �' 1 "Sad':� ^�i a .�� •. �����\o•" �,�^. �• ,� ` :. � O16� _ `gip\ w�� � ���V RK p \ r 14 h�fti� .w� sx '✓ cw� .t : ice _ 4�q w av p f w 0 t iYLA5 4VB.7S PpJ Q' q ZZ. 11Pr � ti Q�� i!/3643�Bf 44d/O'i1161/PiJ IN k .li.mal �.J _ ti. f• '�, �S �V- • •. WQ� ^p$(ttr��.,,• �..Y V.'�. Q� !� i ' i w r (•h tilt Y (� '�,t: ` •L " t �1• _"\ - � 0 � try [w � •��� � ,� � h ; � - ^ ). .4 t Q pY/ _ _ ti�� �� J/ •� ♦ v - .- .t9 N36//'2.3 E 699.53' k. � N %,(Oqa v ° 31� mow rnNa Fs L g $ t � F • p i C- ♦ b ti 1—N , au SA i QJ Mg 17'11 <R)(A/Ji;WE 390.99'm6(,P,) � 3 � 9a.90'RZJ y T + c `\ •mss; , ` `, 1 x:y-. tat: tii• > � T"-iN�'», ro"!'"�"4" "�V1 _i=- � rk �.- >:,S\\'.- y; y �f -tl \ �. ti 71 '•� _ �'.� Ce TS� r�r � �� t�Y�'�^' n i':q t,7'+Ft � f fit.:tt� '"� ^'� ,rt ��" i�':S+s �r..4 Ri1C =xs ,' rt.."�"' �•� ss _ .r E vs- ;n 1 r'-t'f-t '`' 2 d a { -i x - ,",l 1 .. y?a�'4 . a'$ ,� '' yf':yµ:.a.e 1 "' tea"'` '3• fit ;+n v. t yaw" ra..e ,rt' tk-.h l tg' 'k �tl' v s 'iC: A. itiA „i�ta f �2 .ak 9 •PT.:t T r ilk � f;} e,• i-�� -� 'i .,{ ? 3-a��7' t�'3,��� '��`:":!' t �' t��.{�Y��•.-..� t.`-� Y. '_StF z k $ Ci n ez Fat dui ., d y k *a� i ��`+{ Eii 4�� y:ai ski asf rt???mom rC C v Ar ,}+st.Y ��=� e't.....n�-`Ey st x y ,.¢ {`� 4 �e x� € ''+•i*N: s.t��w ti� � .;:�ia-n Vk _ f t .as a R a+.`t�#h€ -p s r'��. 1'� '�.3+ a�'' T �..i.+ �.+ p r tt is x r t r.:. raj •S3+F'4'�.etxa..�+�-»'i ``'4.t b '.� • e: `t-: c 4. Y•r"f- ' .. �za 7•'i 7 3 s �' 2 { .ry4 "` ,.T ry + T\ - /VX V/S9 E BSZ./S'hf b(P,) (N36'30f 9SZ22:Pp� VA o � v y R•93. L90.29' -_ ,•. - 07 rb 44 • \�V- c r tia�O,r� .� O a^1�'� nr'� a i+ art} �`^�������'���'� (��`\ t':. ��,4t4A,t, t�,tz. U4 S4 Szh I-All 7i m w � k r n, \.� •X6.62' - / 4, � ' n oO�Jy -- /l'�6 3B3Z f 5,?Q73' � 0 F 1 1 e • M E M 0 R A N D U TO: CITY MANAGER March '2, 1982 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT LA 811204:1 LOCATION: 3105 & 3125 San Fernando Road (Lots 29,30, Block 25) APPLICANT: Elizabeth R. Miller (Stewart) On January 25, 1982 the City Council approved Tentative Lot Line Ad- justment LA 811204: 1 allowing- adjustment of two parcels, subject to certain conditions and inconcurrencewith the recommendation of the • Planning Commission. The zoning is A-1-BV-3 and the General Plan designation is Suburban Single Family Residential. Staff review has determined that all con- ditions of approval have been met. On March 1, 1982 the Final Lot Line Adjustment Map was 'reviewed by the Planning Commission and recom- mended for acceptance. LAWRENCE STEVENS MTJRRAY L. ARDEN Planning Director CtJ Manager /Ps • l ,:;12EOAT82-17 -woM ON THIS �31M N?9 eBAS/s 1E Oi ZYPERSON WHOSE CONSENT/S 3 I \ �`�.! \\ - O H/�P1gMl '' ' 0 7. C CQVSENT 10 THF PREPARATTpy _ //? 40f�'f/�ys . ' LOT T AS SHOWN tsr = WITHIN THE COLORED d�Rµ ?6'!Se / so/M j .�.. S?6. S - oe �ss. UNE 10 BEOELE'TED •- - /� 7GNED,A NOTARY PURL C 'FARED ELZUBM RENTGW t = •-MES ARE SUBSCRIBED ; MAr SHE ErEWED ME s PARCEL _ 5,Ac,GR g j 4.85AaNET Of / ti �. I - o' � � 4.83 NEZ to r 1 - 9RAz k § N?go30ZY f ar. I2x srivc niPi►EwwY W/LIE H�. ej has •'! .:fix- --,�. 'ue,++*f,a L .a, t-i-' f _ J I z�. 2• _ LEGEN, LongY'ClKrd '• , ; ti S fII!/2 RE �8 ` h M N37.08'49'W 145.6!(M) �- RI 304 -. \ \ R=358.20;4=23°2716,&146.63'(MJ ' POINM TD R'33a.20,4•23°30;G`146.92'(RJ .t - RF110MID6 _12fM1'nErw.t ` (1weJrNrJ }No scaO•SEr cq . Y 7w B4SIS is / M V2 1r VN,'WrrABLEL 13 yy `` `� .•. =:45(Ar J _-ia 7-1 Ym SEE O£TA/L lZ8.4b( J ' _ X22"W(M N49W RJ h r.. ASEhfEllrl Fp r _ E ,A N 4B•X53, ® I C�✓v vtkEa • RO M E M O R A N D U M TO: CITY MANAGER March 2, 1982 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF PARCEL MAP AT 811028:1 LOCATION: Santa Lucia , and Cencerro Roads (Lots 4,5,6,34 and 35 of Block 84 and 85 APPLICANT: Tenneco (Twin Cities Engineering) On January 11, 1982 the City Council approved tentative Parcel Map AT 811028:1 which is a resubdivision of five existing lots, subject • to certain conditions and in concurrence with the recommendation of the Planning Commission. The zoning is A-1-BV-5 and the General Plan designation is Suburban Single Family Residential Staff review has determined that all con- ditions of approval have been met. On March 1, 1982 the Final Map was reviewed by the Planning Commission_and recommended for acceptance. LAWRENCE STEVENS MUR Y L. ARDEN Planning Director Citty Man � er /ps 1 / t .VqnSP • .; � �sT �.nrs'.yh �.—•� �� _��Y'Py^��stvK�s+`=.'Ccs-�f'�Cr"�'" � v9.-�=: - *�4*,i-A-%,.�` .�'' -;"��.-=s• _,,•y'���#1St- '�"�rt lrtt'�T� .u":3,�' � e �u���J�'^.;.v-rY�. ?t, 'wr�".T` -cG xi k s ty.►...rm:�es�o..ariac+a. ..-.i 3� 'x" x. ^,. �� Y ,% � }mea,_ . T.4.s .e�"+. ,� "sf � .,4e� ny y t +`;:usX'v-"'�•f � .f� �i^A' -e�,Y $ tx �,.\' 'i �y V 1 94 I tz r ..,, .� l '"�,s4rL-,f ..rv*s-4+:.'3 -•k•f.` t .�St.. ,tr` s a..;,'.^1;t p+,,I Eli n. 't •�,3,+''ae.�# as .s - '�.d, Z TQC �a_, �` �' y5 � F ••- ;N s `�R"f,5-• ia7"'�>°a.``t 'G�i t '`'..\ F aK 1 ��yrf,. • -8 $ e \\\ -.. :•` ¢t "a':�t�-Y:ryvr,>�:�Xs��`� 3-t ` L) }...t� r�'rYr r s .a.�(� 11/SAY . , t '1 �(y'h,Y'd,w��p Cb h�. �r ti] h V u v riot moo h 's 14Z All t /�l�',!,�pry 0� t - S614Y'PS E is ' 491 Ile a Y- a_..tr„^..yryi x C#• _$}'^rtx7r„. �9 Tva, !_ r!!� �p' / � \ -'v�r7f -. yx" - `,.,ter., ,y}� .4yz'ri:'✓ / 1/ a-as r E - � •s "S. ;-A. ' "s '� t s•� O � /� n.I:` `h Q�'V Y,K s � ..r•,r ♦may \• a -k`n..`c. .,�+, xf .W;Y;`.+.X-�: 35'N �. � .�/ + Aar ui "Q e-jr4£r3� � .+. a Yt i .a k ' ' ,E,a •frt �" � la q� yr�x s� L\ 0.v�h ,;? } 'V uN, t � �• `CIL. NZ Ig s$�e .� 00 r ti oo t o C\ r X30\ lz wt ems` `yCg�ar I t�F �O v ..-v"r-`r<•wit s \. � _r5 x 'KC ' .,, - � tp � � �Y2\g�O is^'-4 2.V��" 1 J / • M E M O R A N D U M TO: CITY MANAGER March 1, -1982 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF TRACT MAP AT 810121: 1 (Lot 6, Block UA) LOCATION: 6800 Alcantara Avenue (Lot 6, Block UA), APPLICANT: Gaylen Little (Twin Cities Engineering)" On June 8, 1981 the City Council approved Tentative Tract Map AT 810121:1 creating a three unit air space condominium conversion, sub- ject to certain conditions and in concurrence with the recommendation of the Planning_ Commission. The zoning _is R-3-B-2-D and the General Plan designation is High Den- sity Multiple Family Residential. Staff review has determined that T all conditions of approval have been met. et W LAWRENCE ,STEVENS MUR Y L. ARDEN Planning Director Cit Mana er /ps 1 y �� s -e"'y, t z�Y .r 1� 'C`n M•.r M ti a. .44;i - o /lld%CO/cS Sct//?'/cb3r d CdP 244 eO244 /I!D/! ' • /ndCofes Iouna'monu�rx�r/os nofcd > < Fir✓ndur//gin �r RZ - ,ot-n ��. �eoles falrid SIGr�?oIt/Cvrrnfq tie/11n©nura�eyrf,cer Re - 3Z lndfcofes suad � R, 6'lndri'vfes�ccordtrr¢/�6/29A � ' �-,� . �•�59;21ME 3��39'R,):.�.,-� iQGd, ��i�a` - Z^ f Q lrio'12LMt s recnrd/ysr 19/ts//3 shed/Bo/s! (N 7q ,3p E n MER, F�o/und n♦ai/b ffOsh=` r!AX : .I l //•O� F() `s"1d"' _ ::"�.i fJJ (��/C'r�C tnl (IV M f148©Q � -� � a . ,lfora5ont�.��A/ro'`oas - �, Awr. Pen S o � - J .i r •� /yf�P1 ��`�4".♦e_ r�'+` •.,r $�"� ��rr/ p. Z' "'� ♦'��� `:"`- .'-_r."a"` 'tr ' "`}231.1 �� - b1 � /t�77°00+��•�p.9a� 3 55 p5<y a 'y `"' R 3*�.,$'`,}x .'- ,^.... a "j:..: �a w�j. -•, " .'"I' Z29 ZJ '-,z �.,,+...-t�' �� � �'xk3't?iu i���c""�d .«r,.�,� �ry.x"`F. y: t-& -e _�ik1 �;t+n F� '8 '�� F' _O .� ' � '-a sa•� -�. �•^.-�. .. 73 3 i Q ff* - as Cm �+c. S < a F io ."y < ,,, t z�kP,-L L.� f• a �, i e �a< s•ey. N �""•-yy,. =er+. �,,. PRR mss } o z ''tr. ♦f r7iex iTxr,. -• '< a..;. p 26 QC 4 •.r �� ��_: Y - --`-+ ';�a ��— a,.; '�� �xz��`x"J � �"�•3' r4 3y �J �i • �•"''y .p, atm _*�,v - s I :eak y,�!?i''`.�"' � ,2.yy. � '. s'r 'ao t r .7 � TrWy � � .1a•r �~ 'y C�� ,�,��a �>Yi'Y R"'2• 14 rP�t'z - .,r - �"r7«3"'y' t E w. k. 7?�"' � -C�� � 'i_ r�•`� '� Y�vi�� .: a .�_.*�yR� .�".• -d-a3}" 3• �"fit � {'�"cyV,A Z _ r � ..'Lt.x*MKt'dG-^.`�ya'.'•.� m+��- ��-�c,�."'�-.�n --+xl Sfr��fv4�� � .c r,._.�.,, s-,•�,,#p.�r.�„ =if t ''Cv-S'�' _' t�•T � s �'�,etee' _. '.g�ya°'�" -.. :.r t,p t_ r -+t' 1 a.-+-.14 -c•. 4., u `.7< S f _nom ..} �' p S� ••}:�k&� Y,,rYa" y ♦ •Css,.> � -•ate= r3. "' 'mss., '31 _ 1535 /78•� t + w dram x �aC Joe-s?V 191KS. ,30 �...q� �l Ig S x- 'l,o_ � �sry Sip' t!'r .. ° 'S•� . .�F .v. -� h-� � � =-�' ML 1y`- Sir yy i+ I•,•a° ^^4 x "t'._"e ♦T r-£ZU � �aS '• �C .a.«� � \ i a.« " t.`,".'i-.a 'M't ' '�"} ?Tlt r��' LJ a 7€,s.`�.'} ♦r:Crxc'+.•& � '# `Z udi,.E -.. �- t sz4 l vl't,;, .� to ,. �-*i_m, . yjx-Sa-i -rtev - s ?" C ..4 rN-0, NC < �w�� ` \ �� ti� i k-a `x :_-'(sig '�Y.S�.," fl!�� fi .' — 3tt'3•.,.:, '+ "`` C` s •� ,t „..t�"�- ♦ 'a z R � v� tk. u4:2�L . • '�a f- �. y'.F. 'R k uY?d w 'Yx< F'f�- � }�3' is -�.4 4 �t�..- 'f'x.� F t.»t a"3'tr=*. � ,, V1 t=-'•r�,� .,._h+, + c� � �, t s�� <�� �ten. ,z�:�K -�r•�•�- �..._=�:` .' t„s� ��, ._.a'Y;u � P t` TM .tr,^ A {' '}�.its A- 4 �.�i-T•(. .,y,.r _rY, ” ` �� - a found) AP u p / / ��.gal�3) rGC4S�l/�D : s ate.:` r Z (�'. ,{ao as r �r,w +n.: Vc«- . r , '' s �• k lAk 0 (J' .�a,s ;+. �r+t =s. `:.*�.'�` ..s-• y, .mow. # �N13 i S/ole o/Co/r!O/nos :s '� ,pel Zi F , Cbrinly o/S'on �.,,.n y t .:.>-..., ...-.�:s-- e'+Cr.,.t.i•,r-�f,;t` .-».� t ,ro 'o%!Le c ✓"ML, bdaJr - Eslob/rshcd b pzrofioli' v` LYI/his 1 -- r1 t I rc r foI "owaj Rock pry/nes BENEF/C/A 7Y Jhe unoers nM,O no o <ArH , and County an stale„xrsolx:; accr_o' r• fission Fcdera!Sowings and Loon 4ssceiofion, .- 4 moan/o Inc fv e 1.4cX yl o corporo>ion as to do cd of 1r�sf rccoidcd j,_R. S s a_k knOKI Al 17 tr the le6iuory If,/999, 117 Book 2132 Ooge 4992,0 A. Pi cs'(dovTo/t./iSS/On feCC SC7�I�sc�dLam rc u of ,� -, ,r ffie coroaRntia�Jhot excc� °d t`r wr.iin hl-75 nrnt : - 67ow17 to me lobe ffr, I:5-' :a�a^r dtheur rn .., s.'07 X1/0/SO. CLY 'Ulioil_OIdGfr?k Kd f017e �{ ! vice ;drn4 _ _ porl�orotia7 ucr�ifcd 1fx s�rrle os r/� ey ..-. :. ;- � r. '. '... .-:..-i+i�'r.'.".'!n^.9'. _ •..oa +e.eat+' ` _ `•a��FJr.:.� Q '� ��..- : l' ..- .rt aorrr wac-Gxia••t .. V t C C .PAB d dC ht w�rryy •�'� .,-n.o..amcc w �' � J t _ .��5 � ;. t r .+r F 1 -�3 .-r�»4 )0^4��`v �•-Fy ;�,(..Y' ii Ml taw�n Ev.3d t�1�� � . -,y;, lliivl�Y.+LYs+� M E M O R A N D U M TO: CITY MANAGER ' "' March 3, 1982 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: BUSINESS LICENSE FOR "BIG JOHN STRONG CIRCUS" A license application has been received to conduct a circus on March 30, 1982 at the corner of San Anselmo and El Camino Real (adja- cent to San Luis Butane) . The applicant proposes to conduct two shows at 6:00 and 8:00 that evening. Regulations require City Council approval of the business license The application_has been reviewed with the Fire Chief and Police Chief and it is Staff' s recommendation that: Council authorize issuance of the business license subject to the following: 1) Circus to be limited to the date and hours requested and to the location requested. 2) Provide written permission from property owner . • 3) Provide site plan showing tent location, parking, access to park- ing -and sanitation facilities. 4) Submit plans for traffic direction and control and for on-site security. (Note: An on-site telephone to contact emergency ser- vices or other approved communication arrangement is needed. ) 5) Provide proof of insurance coverage. 6) Obtain the following permits, including any required inspections: a) Inspection of tent and bleachers by Fire Department. (Note: Site to be free and clear of weeds, etc. prior to tent placement. ) b Permit emit and inspection. by Health Department for food and .for. sanitary facilities. (Note: The number of required facili- ties to be established by Health Department. ) c) Electrical permit from Planning Department (unless generators are used) • Big John Strong Cire - /30/82 7) ProPerty to be returned to neat and clean condition including re- moval of trash, debris, etc. upon conclusion ofevent. LAWRENCE STEVENSY WARDEN Planning Director ty M ager /Ps5 �.w/ ��Zs;�y�-�.P �I f �CJ��✓i,.f rte I/ • 2 M E M O R A N D U M TO CITY MANAGER Manch 2, 1982 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ZONE CHANGE 2801107:1 LOCATION: Between Highway 41 and San Marcos Road (Ptn. Lot 46, Block 40) APPLICANT: Langford and Ibsen Enterprises (Stewart) REQUEST: To rezone property from A-1-BV-5 to A-1-2 1/2 On January 4 , 1982 the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the Draft EIR and Zone Change and continued the matter for public comment on the Draft EIR. A summary of the environmental document was given by Mitch Walker of Walker Planning Associates. Doug Langford, applicant, appeared and indicated that the EIR would be helpful in finalizing the project design. Mr. ,Langford 'expressed his desire for smaller lots to `make' them more affordable. Dan Stewart, applicant' s engineer, indicated specific comment on the EIR would be submitted in writing. Bruno Adamoli and Greg Ellison expressed concern for small lots being allowed due to potential septic system problems and due to effect on the rural character of the community. On February 16, 1982 the Planning Commission unanimously -recommended certification of the Final Environmental Impact-Report and a change of zone from A-1-BV-5 to RPD-4 adopting the Findings set ` forth in the attached Staff Report. There was considerable discussion among the Commission concerning the advantages and disadvantages of the various zoning alternatives. Concern was expressed regarding possible designs to mitigate the issues raised by the EIR including road slopes, septic designs, area- wide circulation and related factors. It was the consensusof the Commission that the RPD zoning allowed the most flexibility to design a project which adequately mitigated the environmental and other con- straints on the site and that the site could accommodate a- four acre average density. l Final E.I .R./Zone Change Z801107:1 ,(Langford) Mitch Walker, EIR consultant, answered several questions and read into the record several late comments. Dan Stewart, applicant' s engineer , appeared and indicated concurrence with the recommendation. John Cole, area resident, expressed concern on the circulation in the 3-F Meadows area. John Morris, area property owner , commented on his previous zone change to A-1-2 1/2 which was denied. No one else appeared on the matter. Copies of the Draft EIR have been previously circulated to the City Council and the attached materials (written comments and responses to comments) complete the environmental document. 1A LAWRENCE STEVENS M RRAQager. WARDEN Planning Director ity /Ps 2 r�Ir!Ir��ze� ri; r ,..,,,„„ CITY OF ATASCADERO \ SER, Planning Department February 16, 1982 0� STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: Zone Change Z801107: 1 Draft Environmental Impact Report LOCATION: Between Highway 41 and San Marcos Road Portion Lot 46 , Block 40) APPLICANT: Langford and Ibsen Enterprises REQUEST: To rezone property from A-1-B-V-5 to A-1-2 1/2 BACKGROUND 1. Existing Zoning: A-1-B-V-5 2. General Plan: Suburban Single Family Residential 3. Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission determined that a Draft EnvironmentalImpactReport should be prepared for the project indicating that potentially significant environmental effects are likely to occur if the project is implemented as pro- posed. The Draft E.I .R. has been completed and is being presented for public review. 4. Site Conditions: The site is comprised largely of gently rolling , to steeply sloping terrain. Slopes range from 10% to 108%. Vege- tation consists of natural grasses and scattered and dense stands of oak trees. Access to the site is presently off a recently paved extension of San Marcos Road. 5. Project Description: The applicant is proposing to rezone the subject 125 (approximate) acres from A-1-B-V-5 to A-1-2 1/2. -A preliminary development plan has been submitted with the rezoning request indicating a subdivision of the subject property into 36 lots ranging in size from 2.5 to 17 .13 acres each, with an average size of approximately 3. 5 acres. The preliminary tract map indi- cates that access to the site would be proposed via extension of San Marcos and Vista Roads, each terminating in a cul-de-sac. Most of the lots would have complete frontage on these roads, some lots are flag lots and one will require a private access easement across another lot. An emergency access road is proposed through an adjacent 33 acre lot to Carmelita Road. Zone Change Z8011071.0,,Draft E.I .R. (Langford) 6. Prior Action: On February 2, 1981 the Planning Commission con- ducted a public hearing on the zone change and 'determined that an E.I .R. was necessary. In July, 1981 a request for proposals (RFP) was sentout and on September 1, 1981, Walker Planning Associates was selected to prepare the E.I .R. On September 25, ` 1981, a No- tice of Preparation for the Draft E.I .R. was mailed to solicit in put from affected public agencies and utilities. On December 24 , 1981 a Notice of Completion of the Draft E.I .R. was mailed to affected public agenciesand utilities. This, in addition to the public hearing notice published and mailed to surrounding property owners, initiated the formal public review which will run to February 1, 1982. COMMENTS ON DRAFT EIR The following is a summary of written comments and responses received in conjunction with the Notice of Preparation for the Draft EIR for this rezoning proposal: Atascadero Unified School District - Notes that the property is loca- ted within the Monterey Road Elementary School attendance boundary and that all schools within the City limits are filled to capacity. Mike Hicks, City Fire Chief Notes response time to area, traffic circulation concerns, roadway standards, building identification needs, hydrant spacing requirements, and wildland fire hazard a concerns. Atascadero Mutual Water Company - Notes that development would have negative effect since a large number of lots is not proposed and area water usage is below norm. Pacific Gas and Electric - Notes easement and other preliminary needs for utility service. - Pacific Telephone - Notes service requirements. Southern California Gas Notes location of gas service in the area and their service requirements. Department of Fish and Game - Notes probable impacts to resident wild- life of high-intensity livestock use of property, effect of oak tree removal/disturbance, potential soil erosion and other human factors Air Pollution Control District - Notes that a standard air quality analysis should be adequate and advises of the future likelihood of the Atascadero area existing Federal ozone standards. Department of Conservation - Notes concerns for surface slope stab- ility, potential debris flow in natural slopes, and potential effect of private sewage disposal systems on slope stability. 2 Zone Change 2801107:*raft E.I .R. (Langford) The following is a summary of written comments and responses received on the Draft EIR itself: Atascadero Unified School District - Notes that Escuela Del Rio is run privately and not by the District (p. 95) . Observes that the Table on page 95 might be more meaningful if it indicated schools within City versus schools in unincorporated area. Points out that attendance has increased since report was prepared. Notes that reports omits infor- mation that there is no bus transportation for the Junior High School. Mike Hicks, City Fire Chief - Notes that dry river crossing across Atascadero Creek would improve emergency access (p. 51) . Observes that grazing activity has reduced fuel load and associated fire haz- ard (p. 64) . Points out that the California Department of Forestry mutual aid assistance is limited during the fire 'season (p. 91) . In- dicates misinformation on structural fires and fire insurance rating (p. 91) . Points out current City policy on extension of San Marcos to Highway 41 and observes that there would not be any fire impact if there was no development (p. 92) . Questions response time for ambu- lance service (p. 97) . Disagrees with impact on emergency services (p. 97) . Observes that the Department does not have equipment to handle road develpment of 30% (p. 107) . Larry McPherson, City Public Works Director —Discusses several points on traffic and circulation that were not adequately covered in the EIR. Agrees that the amount of traffic is not a major concern based • on road capacity but is a major concern based on inadequate circula- tion. Indicates that the extension of Highway 41 seems to be the only feasible way to provide much-needed secondary access. Points out the questionable value and other problems associated with connecting San Marcos to San Gabriel. Objects to funding a "dry river" crossing from City funds pointing out that those benefiting should accept such costs and further notes design problems for the connection of the crossing with Highway 41. Indicates that extension of Carmelita to San Gabriel should also be based on benefit. Notes limited access to lower por- tion of Langford property and difficulty in retaining 15% roadway - slope recommended in EIR. Dan Stewart, applicant' s engineer - Points out that the proposed dev- elopment is subject to change since the lot design was submitted pri- marily to facilitate review and that it does not propose the maximum development possible under the zoning requested. Comments on recent zone change and parcel map actions in the area. Indicates site is only th miles from CBD. States that torte sewage disposal system design is an neering problem that cannot be resolved throu�b---�gn- G; tv ctions. Discusses pad and road grading impacts and proposed CC&Rs inten cTed to minimize the impacts. Comments on septic tank maintenance districts. Suggests lesser set- backs for several lots due to their slope. Notes that drainage miti- gation will be included in design. Indicates that City and other owners must take initiative to resolve road and circula ion ro ems an makes specs c comments on the main circu a ion congestion points. Disagrees with effect of cluster housing design on wildlife. Comments on population growth trends in the 3-F Meadows area. Mr . Stewart has 3 Zone Change Z8011074R/Draft E.I.R. (Langford) also prepared an alternate lot design intended to respond to points - raised in the EIR. It is further contended that the alternate designs are not practical, economical or feasible. Harold Mitchell, Casita Road resident - Favors retaining existing lot sizes limits opposing higher densities. Comments on alternatives to the circulation system. Raises concern that EIR recommendations are too vague. Contends EIR lacks an analysis of alternatives and a cost-benefit analysis. Air Pollution Control District - Recommends certain mitigation mea- sures during construction. Recommends solar access and development requirements to reduce energy consumption. Albert Bristow, area property owner - Objects to 'smaller lots. STAFF COMMENTS Draft EIR: It should be remembered that the purpose ,of an EIR is to provide detailed environmental information to assist in making decisions on projects which can potentially alter the environment in some significant way. This EIR has raised a number of issues all of which cannot be resolved as part of the zone change process so it must be understood that the EIR will also be essential to the re- view of subsequent proposals affecting the Langford property (i.e. tentative tract, etc.) . It is unnecessary to further summarize the EIR as part of this Staff Report as an adequate job has been done on pages 101-107 of the EIR. The EIR does identify several impacts that cannot be mitigated, including: - probable failure of private sewage disposal systems - inadequate emergency access scenic impacts due to excessive grading Mitigation measures for other impacts identified in the EIR are intended to reduce the significance of their effects to an -ac- ceptable level. It should not be expected that each and every mitigation measure is to be incorporated into the final project design; however , the degree to which those measures are included will be critical to the decision made on that design. This EIR fulfills its purpose by providing a wealth of informa- tion intended to positively affect the final design. There will certainly be disagreement over some of the impacts that might result and over some of the mitigation measures that are sug- gested. However , each and every impact and each and every miti- gation measure need not be agreed upon to certify the EIR nor to act on the zone change request. Certification of an EIR means that the document has been completed in compliance with CEQA and 4 Zone Change Z801107:*raft E.T.R. (Langford) that the decision-making body will consider the information in the document in its review of the project. As required by law, the EIR includes alternatives to the project proposed by the applicant and, in this case, provides three al- ternate designs (and appropriate rezoning) indicating in chart form (p. 115) the possible impacts of these alternatives. Care should be exercised in evaluating the alternatives since they illustrate possible approaches and are not intended to be specific choices. Zoning Alternatives: The applicant' s request involves a change of zone from A-1-BV-5 to A-1-2 1/2. This would allow the site to be broken into lots of as small as 2 1/2 acres and would be consistent with the min- imum size recommended by the General Plan. There is, however , some question that the minimum lot size is appropriate consider- ing certain criteria to be evaluated in such a determination. It should, however , be understood that the current design proposal does not seek the maximum density of 50 lots that might be allowed with A-1-2 1/2 zoning. Furthermore, it is unlikely that any sub- division proposal could achieve that density and attain an ac- ceptable level of mitigation of impacts identified in the EIR. • The current zoning is A-1-BV-5 which establishes an average lot size of five acres while allowing individual lots to be as small as three acres with the size based on slope. A footnote to the chart in the zoning ordinance would allow lots to be as small as acr n new subdivisions rovided that there was a suitable building site on each lot an provided that the average density was maintained through open space dedication. The General Plan, as a result of a recent amendment, would not preclude any lots of less than 2 1/2 acres provided that an acceptable overall density was maintained. Based on the five-acre average density, 25 lots would be allowed. The flexibility in the BV footnote is, however , limited to open space dedication and the lack of specific land so indicated may not allow this approach. It may be possible to consider other zones using the BV approach while changing the average density. Both- BV-3 and BV-4 (as well as lesser densities) could be used while providing for slightly higher average densities with 41 lots for BV-3 and 31 lots for BV-4. The footnote and General Plan standards are the same as the preceeding paragraph. The zoning ordinance also provides for a RPD (Rural Planned Dev- elopment) Zone. The intent of this zone is to preserve natural attributes and scenic characteristics of rural lands. However , the zone can only be applied at the request of or with the consent of the property owner. The density is established as part of the • zone (for example: RPD-5 means one dwelling unit per five _acres) . Various densities can be specified depending on which is deemed appropriate. The RPD Zone can be quite similar to the BV approach 5 Zone Change 280110710/Draft E.I.R. (Langford) except that the smaller lot sizes are not tied to dedicated - open space (i.e. the open space could be part of the lot with deed re- strictions to govern future splits) . The review procedures called for a Development Plan or a Specific Plan (per Government Code Section 65451) , but this could be coordinated with the• Tentative Tract Map. The determination as to which zoning is appropriate should not necessarily be tied to either the applicant' s current proposal (which has not been filed as a tentative map) or to one of the alternatives developed in the EIR. Rather , the determination should be based on the General Plan and its related criteria and on the information learned about the property within the EIR. Much of the site is quite steep with the upper portion of the site being less than 30% and the lower portions exceeding 30%. Other smaller lots existing in the area were created under A-1-1 1/2 zoning, which is no longer consistent with the General Plan, or as part of the original Colony subdivision. Access to the 3-F Meadows area is limited due to the incomplete circulation system (Note: The ,,applicant should be aware that current City policy would not allow any subdividing without improvement to the area-wide circulation system) . Experience indicates that the entire area, including the subject property, suffers from poor percolation inhibiting conventional gravity systems. If accept- able road slopes are to be maintained, lower portions of the site are not readily accessible. As a result, it seems density similar to that now allowed by the zoning is most appropriate. Staff is inclined to support an RPD Zone, but the "consent of the owner requirement may -make this infeasible- since previous conversation with the owner and his engineer were not fruitful in this regard. Staff' s preference is basedon the apparent higher flexibility regarding open space than seems available with BV. With regard to density, Staff feels that the minimum acceptable average density is four acres in Tight of the steepness of the site (especially on the lower portions) and in light of the area wide circulation problems. It is realized that some smaller lots are probably acceptable especially nearer to San Marcos, but finding the proper zoning to accomplish this is difficult based on the current zoning ordinance. RECOMMENDATION AND FINDINGS (EIR) Findings: 1. The Final Environmental_ Impact Report which consists of the Draft Environmental Impact Report (including appendix) , written comments on the Draft, and responses to the written 6 Zone Change 2801107:*raft E.I .R. (Langford) 0 comments, has been prepared in compliance with the Califor- nia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the State guidelines. 2. Adequate notice has been made and adequate time allowed for review and comment on the Draft Environmental Impact Report by the general public, affected public and private agencies and the applicant. 3. The Final Environmental Impact Report contains sufficient information to allow an informed decision on the zone change request and future projects for the site while taking into consideration the environmental consequences of the project. 4. Mitigation measures identified within the Final Environment- al Impact Report shall be given substantial consideration in future projects on the site to assure that all significant impacts have been reduced to acceptable levels. Such con- sideration shall include changes to the project deemed necessary to achieve acceptable levels of impact reduction or shall include a Statement of Overriding Considerations pursuant to Section 15089 of the CEQA guidelines. Recommendation: . Based upon Findings 1-4 above, the Planning Department recommends that the Final Environmental Impact Report be certified. RECOMMENDATION AND FINDINGS (Zone Change Z801107: 1) Findings: 1. Slope and other characteristics of the site make it desirable to allow some flexibility of lot sizes within the development provided that an overall density consistent with the General Plan is maintained. 2. Evaluation of the information contained in the Final Environ- mental Impact Report indicates that the 125 acre site can reasonably accommodate an average density of one dwelling unit for each four acres provided that the subdivision de- sign incorporates measures to reduce identified impacts to an acceptable level. 3. The recommended change in zoning is consistent with the 1980 Atascadero General Plan and with minimum lot size criteria contained therein. 7 Zone Change Z801107�/Draft E.I .R. (Langford) Recommendation: Based upon Findings 1-3 above, the Planning Department recom mends denial of Zone Change 2801107: 1 as submitted and, in lieu thereof, recommends approval of a change of zone from A-1-BV-5 to RPD-4, subject to the consent of the property owner . If the required consent is lacking, a change of zone from A-1-BV-5 to to A-1-BV-4 is recommended. ACTION Direct Staff by motion as deemed appropriate. REPORT PREPARED/APPROVED BY: G "E� LAWRENCE STEVENS Planning Director /Ps • 8 LESPONSE TO WRITTEN COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT ENVIRC)VMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR LANGFORD/IBSEN REZONING r 0 LANDFORD IBSEN-REYONE DRAFT E . I . R. RESPONSE TO COMMENTS PREPARED BY WALKER PLANNING ASSOCIATES FEBRUARY 5 , 1982 Three letters of comment were received concerning the draft `E . I . R . by the end official comment period . These three letters are attached and are responded to with the following 1 ) Memorandum From Public Works- Director This letter raises a concern that the project will create a " significant increase in the number of trips within the 3-F Meadows area" and goes on to emphasize the need for a second access to the project . The draft E . I . R . presents a number of alternatives to accomplish this goal and suggests that a second access is needed The Public Works Director presents his opin on on the feasibility of various suggested improvements and suggests that the only feasible alternative is a secondary connection of San Marcos Road . This may be the case , but it was the intent of the E . I . R . to present alternatives . The Public Works Director appears to disagree with the inference in the report that some of the suggested improvements should be City Capital Improvement Projects. The authors of this report feel that this is a City Policy issue that must be resolved by the City and the point was raised because it isanunresolved issue . 2 ) Memorandum From Atascadero Fire Department (Mike Hick) Page 51 No response necessary . Page 64 - No response necessary . Page 91 - The comment is correct and should be noted . C . D . F. responds if available . Page 91 - This reference is from the Uniform Building Code . Grunted, the N . B . F . U . is out of date , but the standards are still useful . Page 92 - Yes . Page 92 - No response necessary . 0 Page 97 - The comment is correct . Response time is more in the range of 10 to 15 minutes Page 97 The comment is valid and the statement in the D . E . I . R . should be ammended to read : b . Impacts . The proposed project could cause significant impacts should secondary emergency access not be available . c . Mitigation Measure ( add ) *provide secondary emergency access to the project . Page 102 - The comment appears to interpret the limitation on road development to areas of less than 30% to mean final road grade . This was not the intent . The comment is meant to restrict roads on areas with a cross slope greater than 30% . 3 ) Letter From D . Stewart on Behalf of Project Applicant Page 3 - The author agrees with the comment that lots may range in size but feels that the document is clear . Page 6 - I agree , but in the absence of a viable alternative submitted by the applicant , the ability to demonstrate an acceptable project design is a basis for denial . Page 9 I agree , Page 10 - The county ' s policies are a separate issue not within the scope of the E . I . R . The distance standard applies only within City Limits . Page 11 -d - The author does not agree that the access issue is a solvable engineering issue within the tentative tract map as proposed . Sewer issues are not as simple as stated given variable perc rates and the potential for surfacing effluent . I agree that there could be individual systems if adequately designed : Page 21 -2 - The author does not concur with 20 ' wide roads. The suggested 5 ' cut and fill requirement in CC & R' s is a good idea . i 2 - A ! 0 Page 22-3 - I agree . Page 38 I agree with this comment in 9eneral terms but also feel that these issues must be considered at the rezoning stage . Page 42 No comment . Pages 43-52 These are useful but require no comment . ' Page 56 - No comment . i 3 - AIR POOLUTION CONTROL IPSTRICT COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO P.O. BOX 637 0 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA 93406-0637 EARL R.KALAR AC/805 AIR POLLUTION CONTROL OFFICER 549-5912 January 29, 1982 i" E C , V- > - Laurence Stevens, Planning Director City of Atascadero P.O. Box 747 Atascadero, California 93422 Dear Mr. Stevens: We have reviewed the Draft EIR for the Langford/Ibsen Rezoning Project, and have found it to be adequate with respect to the air quality impacts which may occur due to the rezoning. However, when subdivision occurs, we recommend the following measures for con- sideration as use permit conditions to mitigate air quality impactsdueto sub- division. First, construction areas should be posted with a S mph speed limit, ` and watered down to minimize excessive dust during construction. Also, solar access and development should be required (page 76 DEIR) . This would reduce energy consumption, and in turn reduce air quality impacts. Very truly yours, ROBERT W. CARR, Director RWC/kw • 72 leiosiix ;'s scG? n tSa r p 1 C /J �� n 'J a ` i BRISTOW P. 0. BOX 941 --#'RtQg-itERLTES-Efr7A7ES CALIFORNIA 90274 j AVOW f�`k^�'� `"sb�' yh"�'k r°`u�,�"nf�i��.P I —J1I���/T�����O✓77fC�—�.�1/lLJ�/�1.�f/�—� y e AC7ZZ11,12 // -`7GJ GPP/7 St/�/�J/ ACL P 1-1741TTl 'YeCf��1i7� 7/ ,r„,T ^�..Kr r�,w�;«�1 -+��» �->,���� i i. ✓�—.1� �/9 if TCf�%�/T/�E'—..�jtl� - .��2�1!?_�%v� fly e � S Gj� / /f7%fl% /�T /off I Al rt �I � f J GrP f�ir>� �! 1u11 rr� ri�ii3PiL��1r471 -`x Sc /�� .S��J�� Jin cr�r�s!' arc f � a � Priv �Ih°�rlL�liriah r-W-2 319 Zr2, l) i r e5liP _�'- / 1�� rP r hp y "- 11' .�'OCL501/ Lrv_enny» lyi�h e �1� I 77V"_�. MWIMMER ate 3 4nk RIO _a L'YJ/JfZ Il_� �S A7 hel �r�cir�ye d cr cel/amu/ d'Z der r hmnre°ax , ¢t.�^x r #'k"'s'G.�i nr?.x Nd L4��✓-i�+./-1.�� /iC:)�11�J� /T1.�� �[�(���L���S-. n tG� 9Z 7�,0 �ar-� irc rcry67 hyry/d��, rl l_ .LrJ_[O-P� �L� Si�P �'� !�/17�.��irl roc�cJ ✓���2 Z- pec �h ��f�lhc re off/ _ ��nn<c/ •lv'+�`.'�l1C�q�dG�v�rt� µm+41 �..� 'Au Sq.. '!yam _ //_ / .. G�T�c/3711T F��12�� t SPI !rh d� r /�G!/l! i • a i/dLiS U/h��1 1C 1�1� Z,z E. _ i � /LJorYd �Uu - Y/ s lat.Zc ey- - E 47/ �e kt iyyY' �01 cYZ7Y��J� f Ghl� %r1QL/�P - ;� - IrOyeW22 7)2L QNB 7b /1'Ir�rr 6t'ac �• _ aQ SG 7111sz%I;IJ b1° • i S r y i II J I, b CIAI ! r-- �r /r/2Lf awd 17 -7�40 L/r Dawe J/J 4Z /�� r— ^rt ,u LiS4r a ? e aw n'dY4' -----/_��/f�Jy ._..r1 _.��_+_C«_/� 4J7! _PJ7.� �l ,� .A, .•ca i I ALI- �e-1�yuJylvma�7�-s- (�r Phil n'eYPlu�m a.,�-_u_�i_a_ c�s� 1 ry /oc,�I r I f l �h d Gee Duh so/ ha y 1C1liSTQIj_ LJGC�c�GY rte_ f 49/�liL�[✓_—J1/l/� �fNCI fYJ—_.LX2��/Q_�1���}UYllr`!!�J iN-xt lel . - -- GJ�rh? 1L' 11_7t5_ SGhic /tom 96 J ju n / cart y„�••`"' r �t::+6,� .w 4� rc � i i ;7f�ll---.�z���/�_�J��'�CS�Yi�<� �y �1ir ,�Z•� %S �1%'L(suv�lr/��ioh �i�h c��c%r�� �E �l• J'1' dish 7h� _`y n, p'-�' •,..y.Y-fit, ...^' ��C�/1�11(�11L21/77G� �G'l/ h I I - e , r a f, � t,;,-�+' .� 'r*w•fo,�a� +l=. �yr'b Yp cw � J�i'.ttkl'S � - �:. i .. .. i L } N I WRITTEN COMMENTS RECEIVED AFTER THE DEADLINE ON THE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR LANGFORD/IBSEN PREZONING -- 1 o. State of QTalif az GOVERNOR'S OFFICE �"46 ma OFFICE OF PLANNING AND RESEARCH s 1400 TENTH STREET SACRAMENTO 95814 EDMUND G. BROWN JR. 7-� p p GOVERNOR F 9 February , 1982 Mary Beatie City of Atascadero P.O. Box 747 Atascedero, CA 93423 SUBJECT: SCH# 81100605 Langford Rezoning Dear Ms. Beatie: State agencies have commented on your draft environmental impact report (see attached) . If you would like to discuss their concerns and recommendations, please contact the staff from the appropriate agencies. When preparing the final EIR, you must include all comments and responses (CEQA Guidelines, Section 15146) . The certified EIR .must be considered in the decision-making process for the project. in addition, we urge you to respond directly to the agencies' comments by writing to them, including the State Clearinghouse number on all correspondence. A recent Appellate Court decision in Cleary v. Countv of Stanislaus clarified reuuirements for responding to review comments. Specifically, the court indicated that comments rust be addressed in detail, giving reasons why the specific comments and suggestions were not accepted and factors of overriding importance warranting an ove'r'ride Of the suggestion. Responses to comments .;lust. not be conclusory statements but must be supported by empirical or experimental data, scientific authority or explanatory information of any kind. The court further said that the responses must be a good faith, reasoned analysis. Section 15CO2(f) of the CEQA Guidelines requires that a governmental agency take certain actions if an EIR shows substantial adverse enviro-,unental impacts could result from a project. These actions include changing the project, imposing conditions on the project, adopting pians or ordinances to avoid the problem, Selecting an alternative to the project, ordisapproving the project. in the event that the project is approved without adequate mitigation of significant effects, the lead. ager_cy must make written findings for each significant effect (Section 15088) and it .must support its actionswitha written statement of overriding considerations for each unmitigated significant effect (Section 15089) . If the project requires discretionary approval from any state agency, tine Notice of Determination :,rust be filed with the Secretary for Resources, as well as with the County Clerk. Please contact Anna Polvos at (916) 445-:613 if you have any questions. Si ei.y S , --aim-son C _ r-nghcus e CC. {en Fellows, DWRI State of California �iness and Transportation Agency .Memorandum Ann Barkley,. Chz Chief Date. January 2 7 1982 Division of Trans. Plan File : A-95/CEQA Review Attention Darrell Husum, Jr. SCH 81100605 From DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION District 5 Subject: The Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Langford and Ibsen Enterprises proposed subdivision adjacent to State Highway 41 west of State Highway Y 101 in the Cit of Atascadero has been reviewed by iCaltrans Dpersonnel. S erso n 1. A possible road connection to Highway 41 will require an Encroachment Permit . from Caltrans. Before an Encroachment Permit can be issued, evidence of an Archaeological and Endangered Species Survey is required covering the area within the State Highway right of way. The report should address the possible need for left-turn • channelization at both the dry creek crossing and possible proposed access connection to State Highway 41. Performance bonds could be discussed to provide funds for channelization , access connections and slope failures. W. W. Evans Caltrans District 5 A-95 Coordinator State of Calii' rnia • . The Resources Agency Memorandum 1. James W. Burns To Assistant Secretary for Resources Date WK 221982 2. City of Atascadero Post Office Box 747 File No.: Atascadero, CA 93423 Attention: Ms. Mary Beatie Subject: Langford Rezoning SCH 81100605 From : Department of Water Resources Los Angeles, CA 90055 The Department of Water Resources' recommendations related to water conserva- tion and flood damage prevention on the subject document are attached. Consideration should also be given to a comprehensive program to use reclaimed water for irrigation purposes in order to free fresh water supplies for bene- ficial uses requiring ,high quality water. 16 revd Robert Y. D. Chun, Chief Planning Branch Southern District (213) 620-4135 Attachments Department of Water Resources Recommendatioths for Flood Damage Prevention In flood-prone areas, flood damage prevention measures required to protect a proposed development should be based on the following guidelines: 1. All building structures should be protected against a 100-year flood, It is the State's policy to conserve water. Any potential loss to ground water should be mitigated. 2. In those areas not covered by a Flood Insurance Rate Map or a Flood Boundary and Floodway Map, issued by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the 100-year flood elevation and boundary should be shown on the Environmental Impact Report. 3. At least one route of ingress and egress to the development should be available during a 100-year flood. 4. The slope and foundation designs for all structures should be based on detailed soils and engineering studies, especially for hillside developments. 5. Revegetation of the slopes should be done as soon as possible. 6. The potential damage to the proposed development by mudf low should be, assessed and mitigated as required. 7. Grading should be limited to dry months to minimize problems associated with sediment transport during construction. To reduce water demanP the following water conservation measures should be implemented: Required by law: 40 1. Low-flush toilets (see Section 17921.3 of the Health and Safety Code) . 2. Low-flow showers and faucets (California Administrative Code, Title 24, Part 6, Article 1, T20-1406F) . 3. Insulation of hot water lines in water recirculating systems (California Energy Commission regulations). Recommend be implemented where applicable: Interior: 1. Supply-line pressure: recommend water pressure greater than 50 pounds per square inch (psi) be reduced to 5.0 psi or less by means of a pressure reducing valve. 2. Flush valve operated water closets: recommend 3 gallons per flush. 3. Drinking fountains: recommend equipped with- self-closing valves. 4. Pipe insulation: recommend all hot water lines in dwelling be insulated to provide hot water faster with less water waste, and to keep hot pipes from heating cold water pipes. 5. Hotel rooms: recommend posting conservation reminders in rooms and rest rooms Recommend thermostatically-controlled mixing valve -for bath/shower. 6. Laundry facilities: . recommend use of water-conserving models of washers. 7. Restaurants: recommend use of water-conserving models of dishwashers or retrofitting spray emitters. Recommend serving drinking water upon request only*. Exterior: 1. Landscape with low water-consuming plants wherever feasible. 2. Minimize use of lawn by limiting it to lawn dependent uses, such as playing fields. 3. Use mulch extensively in all landscaped areas. Mulch applied on top of soil will improve the water-holding capacity of the soil by reducing evaporation and soil compaction. *The Department of Water Resources or local water district may aid in developing these materials. t 4. Preserve and protect existing trees and shrubs. Established plants are often adapted to low water conditions and their use saves water needed to establish replacement vegetation. S. Install efficient irrigation systems which minimize runoff and evaporation and maximize the water which will reach the plant roots. Drip irrigation, soil moisture sensors and automatic irrigation systems are a few methods of increasing irrigation efficiency. 6. Use pervious paving material whenever feasible to reduce surface water runoff and aid in ground waver recharge. 7. Grading of slopes should minimize surface water runoff. 8. Investigate the feasibility of utilizing reclaimed waste water, stored rainwater, or household gray water for irrigation. 9. Encourage cluster development which can reduce the amount of land being converted to urban use. This will reduce the amount of impervious paving created and thereby aid in ground water recharge.- . 10. Preserve existing natural drainage areas and encourage the incorporation of natural drainage systems in new developments. This would aid in ground water recharge. 11. Flood plains and aquifer recharge areas which are the best sites for ground water recharge should be preserved as open space. i State of California RESOURCES AGENCY OF CALIFORNIA Memorandum To Jim Burns Date : February 2, 1982 Assistant Secretary for Resources Subject: Draft EIR, Mary Beatie Langford Rezoning, Planning Dept., City of Atascadero Atascadero, San Luis P 0. Box 747 Obispo County Atascadero, CA 93423 -SCH 81100605 From Department of Conservation--Office of the Director We have received for review a Draft Environmental Impact Report for the rezoning of 125 acres within the City of Atascadero. The rezoning would allow denser development of the generally rugged property than allowable under present zoning. The project, in general , appears to be in conflict with the recognized limitations on development density, especially with respect to septic waste disposal and slope stability. With regard to the geologic conditions and hazards at the site, several topics should be further discussed. _ . 1 . The report describes a possible landslide as well as several smaller slope failures. These should be shown on the Geologic Map. 2. Proposed mitigation for development hazards on steeper slopes included restriction of building sites to areas less than 20% in grade. In the context of this recommendation along with Map No. 9, '`Slope Conflict Areas", the report should further discuss the appropriateness of the proposed subdivision. 3. Although discussing the Nacimiento Fault, the report ignores the potentially active Rinconada Fault less than 5 miles east of , o the site. This fault should be mentioned in the report. It would appear that problems are anticipated with on-site septic systems . Percolation tests indicated the need for large areas for ea s. Are there su icien suitable leachfield sites for each proposed lot or for the proposed density? What would be the effects stability from leach fields or spray A rrigation? 5. Several of the proposed Mitigation Measures are either dependent on further studies and do not guarantee 'mitigation c or else would seemingly require a lower density development " ' (eliminating the need for re-zoning). Contributing to preparation of this review was Jerry Treiman (EG 1035) of the Department's Division of Mines and Geology. For questions regarding these comments, contact Perry Y. Amimoto, Advisory Services Officer, at (916) 322-3119. Esther Maser Environmental Program Coordinator cc Perry Amimoto Jerry Treiman "ED FEB jj I • 816 C':-site: Riia.d t _sc dr , C: 93422 iz uv-r 29, 1 y82 rTlr. D; rr . o. 3 �x 747 At;;.sc>:.dSr-!:, C. lif:=rnia 93423 D ar PIr. Stcvc s , ;-i L Mr Mrd/IbS r, ,z v ai 7r ft LIR )r!xp =sed j 1' z _ i t n.s ly _.r. ' 081 F r s L lw-,-c, ut 1 i 1,1 21-111,2 tD Z . 31.19 l-),- siz: '>r is t r r.. sd , psed c _:; s ti - t yr )uld p.;rmit 'ii;-Icr d ac�z � =c-, dl , I ?•;$, .lc li'_�c tm c_ .. int sp cific. 11, -,; tln�t sccti?A tz .H-P rt t' li-ng wit;1 -ccnss �;nld circul ti p. U_;dtr "C. Cz ul _tZ =T I p cts" ) pa-yc 51 th" nd th-t ca yrt`-l: c 1 ." in t'r_3e :st-ad • prZ .d E trv- rk e Jr�,,r--mm d. L T C7't rrF'l with ,_ cti1°IE 7 ii- r :.. t d U1 1 5 ' brZ-1 -R); d. Lj dc. ver, za I fail ) s-C -i--:,)w pr-9-iic'in di tZ__101 a ei�ss fr 3 rt C .c:..C-lita —;;rd ;- ;It:�-r --n Gzbrir"l . i`t_94.=.d. .'r Hig -iwffz ". 41 t7^-_uld 'p`3 _ssc tial -)r i � I%f,y b' c f i t t-� h r. sic. lig i_. -ry spp r r f _, _ s °)f 3F D� ! d-ws ( ~f t7 sc pr-p-s!Yd rp Z-N,^- 1m. ., Prn a idZ.. 1-iv�d �.�:a, t . �if�t.y 41 �cr�su Atmos y dear Cr n fr . C- r._ Ali iz in t. d c _ Tcti: C r',vli :d a ds u 1 d iii le,r t>,.'- s :ll if :cosi- of its w'_l� (1 ) its a lit a r C .r »1i ,_ Klg_d. (2) - i(} access r, sicic -,- C, 5--. -3v.^ �uit"1in j mild` f it-'s int :? v_ c i i. 2 1. .��rn lit .. T-i c s 'f prr)vidi�, ddit1 i'-r t',-ii _+..11 "�iiib,".,r ?i h.`9-me- ?."IF rdl-, b j'7_ !ilirZ ds-o-!-Z�,11_T 'n,l _ 4 cit fT- ?f it t;a? r BLit S div-=-,Il ?C",J`1t y ° i l s'"'_.-3-11:"st w'_-.f, t!)sE°." �p1, i_,. pr 1) d xpq.asi=°i . .rs , �_ tt:p art c 3nnrd tZ _mss y���e 51 r-, t , r..I-is; ,a,rb= r . f a cs Z `r s. F-)r xonipl , z ,.t d> j,'` __. ,p , :Z lc .11v %� � y s -- t1hn "dr ri-. r .:r' .,Z u r 5s At`-se d.-r� Crne-,c ----- s.z-uld • _2_ iiz -d � .. F r� . ,. D!,)ms :,_�1,� „__ _; � _ ,,-,2 , a1_., a-- , rel,; r_hshI. ed t prwid s . %hr atr ._m crissiug, it � rz to y t-,- 1'�LZ :, ;b31) 1 1 �w w ter (but sse,gti ,11y an e -.mpri sed if a e - cr�t ford .,ver c* lv rt sufficie tly J_r_ t h dl thti str��am fl_)w im C;11 D,i t ,h h=7!:.vic�st Df ri,,naffs? 0 `-'_re 1,1(,—: is 111 i2ag =_b )u t, s -3niC,t ll�?5 7 = �"t4.' �� '�[l i�' t�� 1tW.r;: G es? Obvi :-i).sly 1~ si '.�lflca t differ.. : � 1n c s V d.!-nc_zdzn;g -)n, i=;-.Zircn is c `1: snsz. t Z i; d.i s j A n t E'. d 10�d ti S_ �: U,-,briF 1 R.)�d , r!-Iles thm 1 ,:lst .� s Of 11 I� a„i,nz Cr,7�0' c :a__:zee:=tinz .��i �hz�i <� L,1 with C r-..L1it ]Riad (in, the Vicinity 3f the xisti-n dr,; .,!cpther ^r)ssi._ ) r ou d:.mtt ,nzced a s_-c And Ic stly Q-,-,,d unsi-intly -cec--ss dn,"O.y C r-"nw`1ita V.) S=..n u�.bricl. Addit i zzl1 , _hc pnnplwinolive -wst �f San u�e.bri n1 'h,,.-),;d ;� CF r ;�e1i�a rc v >hn,: tI� app s d � . . GO C-0�,_.�eti � C°- r{ _-litz n d Casa_n-va r-gads. It is herd t f 11�) th . <uth is rati -n le eerni �g t'n >>atrl.� =Wit.- si ,7f 'dist Riad t dl _,h3r 41 . • The Report t= ir.s :1rincrius nth it ssu�?pti s, c , jectures or err i(%aus statcme�_nts, tlaz _v;;lidit f which s` uld be chall ���ad. In Pd('iti n it 1,-zeks, ter very css -,tipl cl me -t s in v irtu-ll all pr fessional E< -ir�n.m al I Yp�ct RTp )rts , i. e. "Pik -lysis of alt r ti n s prep, scd" a,-d "., t st/bwn�fit a...;.psis” - f each 1t r ti=s Without these thn d cisi-ni- '_ak r In--s little or no mcns 7r Inaki g d v;Fllid Co';lpl rison if pr as c 3i'3s. Si.3c�r�1 � Hn r-jld % i tc?ill Ata .c;.d.4,r December 31, 1981 • TO: PLANNING DEPARTMENT FROM: ATASCADERO FIRE DEPARTMENT (Mike Hicks) RE: Comments Concerning Langford Draft E.I .R. Page 51 - (Regarding Paragraph #3) - Would improve emergency access. Page 64 - (Regarding Paragraph #3) - One reason that fire activity has not been a major problem in the past is that it was grazed every winter and spring, keeping the fuel load to minimum. Page 91 - (Regarding #4 . Fire Protection) - May assist during the fire season time their resources become few and far inbetween. Page 91 - Regarding b. Impacts) - I wonder where they got this • information. National Board of Fire Underwriters went out with hard rubber tires. (I .S.O. ) Page 92 (Regarding Paragraph #1) - Won 't we have additional access when San Marcos is completed to Highway 41?' Page 92 - (Regarding Paragraph #2) — Keep everyone out and there won' t be any impact. Page 97 - (Regarding #2 , Emergency Medical Services) - There is no way they have a response time of two minutes. North County and Golden State are the same company. I like the map idea. Page 97 - (Regarding b. Impacts) I do not agree. Page 102- (Regarding b. Mitigation Impacts) - We do not have structure protection equipment that can handle road development up to 300 . i •• s WIN WAN y � .•� , � � ., � dWAFA —,now lmr OPM • • . " WPM on �• - ,�� Y i5Q \ 35 9 �\ 30 4L 6 - 44 o 29 43 38 37 36 /07CS 5 10725 � � f 45 39 53 % 28 42A,750 q� p P 42 ov5a o�sS PA 4/C'15D /C"1545 A 42 40 P B �o r2o ic78s P.A i C07,e/-57 rc�CC, qy PB 41 A-1- BV-5 /06cb icge5 Q Z z a Ict^5'- /G F.5 PARCEL 2 PARCEL 2 � h� i 1 40 JC9co /OgOS 46 - 47 2 � l ia3 / s�- C> /C vdS 8 \ NN- MAP ,.N1/ P A-1 - BV- 5 ^Z �bf{ 07 : / N' va�,o^ im�, A _ J ® 1AI� Al7� yV/ Ilk Wl VI �.�rV\� Y � F � r l � �V�A t. ✓no � e' ✓�� - � �'y ��V`� \ � �� �,rY �`��•�_ "_�._Sr I / /r rte/ ��� � l ��� /, 11 ��i y�II ��) �, �y�`✓ A, 1-b c� iii �&A\ i I (� li 3 t moo^ w-.o o ..: � be ��°j � ria ��� �•..� •,�� � i A1 CorvcFPT P� WRITTEN COMMENTS RECEIVED ON THE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR LANGFORD/IBSEN REZONING • • M'r1VE0 'e2' i 91 Atascadero Unified School District Adikki t "Where students and their education are paramount" jX 6800 LEWIS AVENUE ANTHONY AVINA, Ed.D. ATASCADERO' CA 93422 District Superintendent PHONE: (805) 466-0393 December 28, 1981 Larry Stevens Planning Director City of Atascadero P. 0. Box 747 Atascadero, CA 93422 RE: Langford/Ibsen Rezoning • Draft E.I .R. Dear Larry: We are in receipt of the Draft Environmental Impact Report dated, November 1, 1981, on the Langford/Ibsen Rezoning request . I have reviewed the report as it pertains to schools and would like to make the following comments: 1. On page 95 the report states that the school district maintains "a school for mentally retarded adults'''. This is not the case. The Escuela Del Rio School for mentally retarded adults is owned and operated by A.C.E. , a private non-profit organization. 2. The table of schools, construction dates, capacity. and current enrollments is substancially correct , however, enrollments fluctuate and have increased since the November 1 , 1981 date of the report . As a point of clarification, the report might be more meaningful if there was an indication as to which schools are in the city and which schools are located in unincorporated areas of the school district. • Carrisa Plains Elementary • Creston Elementary • Lewis Avenue Elementary • Monterey Road Elementary Santa Margarita Elementary Santa Rosa Road Elementary • Atascadero Junior High School Atascadero Senior High School • Atascadero Adult School • Oak Hills Continuation High School Letter to L. Stevens Cont . Page 2 3. On page 96 where the report addresses school bus trans- portation no mention is made of the fact that there is no transportation for Junior High School or High School students. The same omission is noticed on page 106 of the summary portion of the report. Sincerely , Ernest W. Taylor Business Manager EWT:cip cc: Anthony Avina, Ed.D. , Superintendent AUSD M E M O R A N D U M TO: Planning Director FROM: Public Works Director SUBJECT: Langford/Ibsen EIR I would like to address several points I feel were not adequately covered in the traffic and circulation section of the draft EIR. First, I agree with the technical findings and concur that the proposed development will not significantly degrade the present level of service for the existing roads and intersections noted in the report. However, the potential traffic increase due to this develop- ment does present a significant increase in the number of trips within the 3-F Meadows area and this was the cause for concern expressed by Council in their considerations of the impact of further subdivision and development on an already inadequate circulation system. Staff shares this concern simply because, for a large part of 3-F Meadows, San Marcos Road is the only access point. Although this road could certainly handle more traffic, the lack of a second access point . is a most serious safety consideration. Staff also shares Council ' s determination to see a secondary access for San Marcos Road prior to any further subdivision of undeveloped property obtaining access from this road. The comments in the Appendix and in the Summary section of the draft EIR point to a need for secondary access for this proposed sub- division. The extension of San Marcos Road to its connection with Highway 41 near the summit of Morro Road still seems to be the only feasible construction alternative to accomplish this goal. The Traffic Engineer' s report listed some measures to mitigate the effect of added vehicular volume due to this development. I feel that some of these measures are either not appropriate or not feasible. Discussion follows on these items: 1 Connection of San Marcos to San Gabriel Road. This connection has questionable value in light of its proximity to Nionita and the prevailing direction of vehicular travel. A more serious consideration is the fact that right-of-way problems exist along the proposed route as well as at the proposed intersection. A significant property acquisition would be necessary to align the intersection in a proper configuration. 2 - Formalize a "dry river crossing" connecting Carmelita Road to Highway 41. The report infers that this project should be in • the City Capital Improvement Program. Council has taken a position that this project should be totally funded by only those benefitting from the crossing. The location of the crossing is of concern also due to the prevailing speeds and poor sight distances on Morro Road. • 1 3 - Connect disjointed portions of Carmelita Road to urovide direct access to San Gabriel Road. This project is recommended, however, the question of financial responsibility is again raised, It appears that, most equitably, the payment for this construction • should be the responsibility of only those receiving direct benefit from the extension. It is appropriate that a recommendation limiting roadway grades to below 15% is made in the report, since it appears that the average slope of the study area exceeds this maximum. Access to the lower elevations of this development appears to be extremely limited. WIRENCE McPHERSON LM:vh 12-30-81 • RESOLUTION NO. 8-82 A RESOLUTION OF THE °ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT GP 811019:2 AMENDING THE TEXT OF THE LAND USE ELEMENT AND THE LAND USE MAP WITHIN THE MORR© ROAD STUDY AREA. WHEREAS, the Atascadero City Council conducted a public hearing on the subject matter; and, WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65323 provides that a general plan be amended by the adoption of a resolution; and, WHEREAS, approval of this amendment will not result in any signi- ficant adverse environmental impact as long as appropriate mitigation measures are introduced; and, WHEREAS, the land use designations of Special Commercial and Pro- fessional Office as currently presented in the General Plan create certain difficulties in implementing the plan; due to their overlapping and inconsistent nature; and, WHEREAS, the proposed land use changes provide ,a clearer basis for implementation and encourage a sound, long range guide for land dev- elopment; and, WHEREAS, development opportunities are not significantly altered and economic potential is relatively unchanged. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ;RESOLVED that the Atascadero City Council does hereby approve;General Plan Amendment GP 811019: 2 amending the text of the Land Use Element and the Land Use Map within the Morro Road Study Area as follows: 1. Delete from page 71 of -the 1980 Atascadero General Plan text the section entitled ' °Special Commercial." 2. Delete from pages 71 and 72 of the 1980 Atascadero General- Plan text the section entitled "Professional Office. " 3. Add as an insert to page 71 the section entitled "Commer- cial-Professional as follows: "This land use designation provides for the following general categories of uses: a. Offices; professional, business, medical, financial and utility b. Cultural or fine arts institutions RESOLUTION NO. C. Personal services (not supported by retail sales of goods d. Light retail commercial uses. These categories of uses should be encouragedalong arterials or major collectors where high traffic volumes can be accom- modated and in areas where a compatible transition is desired adjacent to single family areas Access through residential areas shall be discouraged." 4. Add as an insert to page 58 under the heading entitled "Land Use Policy Proposals" as follows 119 . The Land Use Map of the General Plan is not a specific diagram, , especially in areas where there is a transition between different types of land uses, such as residential adjacent to commercial. Since the transition will occur over a period of time and since it is desirable to pro- tect existing, generally less intensive` uses while- en- couraging newer , generally more intensive' uses, the use- of a concept known as the "wavy line concept may be ap- propriate. This concept .will encourage retention of the zoning for the less intensive use until demand dictates a change of zoning for the more intensive use while clearly supporting that future change when the time is appropri- ate. Factors to consider in the timing of these changes will include existing development, property ownership, development potential, access and related physical fea- tures, and compliance with zoning and General_Plan- stand- ards and policies. ' (As an example, an area designated by , the General Plan for commercial use should be granted consistent zoning when contiguous property in the transi- tion area is under the same ownership and can be devel- oped in, a compatible manner; but, when such property, although contiguous, is in another ownership and is developed with a less intensive use, such as a residence, or is vacant, zoning may be withheld until the time is right for the more intensive commercial use.) " 5.' Make changes to the 1980 Atascadero General Plan Map as shown on the attached exhibit, which is made a part hereof by reference, entitled "Recommended Land Use Changes to the Morro Road Study Area." 2 RESOLUTION NO. On motion by Councilman and seconded by Councilman ,the foregoing resolution is adopted in its entirety by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES : ABSTAIN: DATE ADOPTED: ROBERT J. WILKINS , Mayor ATTEST: MURRAY L. WARDEN, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ALLEN CRIMES , City Attorney 3 M E M O R A N D U M TO: CITY MANAGER March 2, 1982 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT GP 811019: 2 LOCATION: Morro Road between Highway 101 and Portola APPLICANT Initiated by Planning Commission REQUEST: To consider text and map amendments within the Morro Road Study Area. On January 25, 1982 the City Council conducted a public hearing on the subject General Plan Amendment and referred three issues back to the Planning Commission for additional consideration. The Commission reviewed these issues on February 16, 1982 and March 1, 1982 and re- ports back as follows: 1) Expand to Retail Commercial Designation on the Land Use Map along Morro Road to include Moore' s Nursery. The Planning Com- mission agrees that the map should be modified to clearly indicate inclusion of the existing nursery with the Retail Commercial land use designation and has adopted a revised Resolution which shows the change. 2) Expand the text to better define "light retail commercial" with- in the Commercial-Professional land use designation. The Plan- ning Commission supports its previous recommendation to not in- clude a more detailed definition on the premise that specifics are more properly included in the zoning ordinance text rather than the general plan text. It should be noted that the attached Staff Report dated December 21, 1981 includes three alternatives for expanding this definiton. The Commission was particularly concerned that a detailed definition could become a constraint to future zoning text changes necessitating a general plan change creating two approval steps instead of one. 3) Review of the "wavy line" concept. After considerable discus sion, the Planning Commission recommends additional wording to . explain the "wavy line" concept. That wording is included in the March 1, 1982 Staff Report and the revised Resolution. The Com- mission feels that this will alleviate the fear of future abuse General Plan Amendment GP 811019: 2 in interpreting the concept while still providing adequate pro- tection for existing uses avoiding the nonconformity problem. The attached minutes of the February 16 meeting of the Planning Com- mission summarize comments made at that time. On March 1st, the following comments from the public were made: Tom LaSalle, Morro Road owner, inquired about a Retail Commercial designation for his property which was located between Moore' s Nursery and Portola Road. No one else appeared. LAWRENCE STEVENS MfJAR,,AY L ARDEN Planning Director Citk Man ger /Ps • 2 u RESOLUTION NO. 4-82 (Revised) A RESOLUTION OF THE ATASCADERO PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT GP 811019: 2 AMENDING THE TEXT OF THE LAND USE ELEMENT AND THE LAND USE MAP WITHIN THE MORRO ROAD STUDY AREA. WHEREAS, the Atascadero Planning ' Commission conducted a public hearing on the subject matter; and, WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65323 provides that a general plan be amended by the adoption of a resolution; and, WHEREAS, approval of this amendment will not result in any signi- ficant adverse environmental impact as long as appropriate mitigation measures are introduced; and, WHEREAS , the land use designations of Special Commercial and Pro- fessional Office as currently presented in the General Plan create certain difficulties in implementing the plan due to their overlapping and inconsistent nature; and, WHEREAS, the proposed land use changes provide a clearer basis for implementation and encourage a sound, long. range guide for land dev- elopment; and, WHEREAS, development opportunities are not significantly altered and economic potential is relatively unchanged. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Atascadero Planning Com- mission does hereby recommend approval of General Plan Amendment GP 811019: 2 amending the text of the Land Use Element and the Land Use Map within the Morro Road Study Area as follows: 1. Delete from page 71 of the 1980 Atascadero General Plan text the section entitled "Special Commercial. " 2. Delete from pages 71 and 72 of the 1980 Atascadero General Plan text the section entitled "Professional Office." 3. Add as an insert to page 71 the section entitled "Commer- cial-Professional as follows: "This land use designation provides for the following general categories of uses: a. Offices; professional, business, medical, financial and utility b. Cultural or fine arts institutions RESOLUTION NO. 4-82 C. Personal services (not supported by retail sales of goods) d. Light retail commercial uses. These categories of uses should be encouraged along arterials or major collectors where high traffic volumes can be accom- modated and in areas where a compatible transition is desired adjacent to single family areas. Access through residential areas shall be discouraged." 4. Add as an insert to page 58 under the heading entitled "Land Use Policy Proposals" as follows: "9. The Land Use Map of the General Plan is not a specific diagram, especially in areas where there is a transition between different types of land uses, such as residential adjacent to commercial. Since the transition will occur over a period of time and since it is desirable to pro- tect existing, generally less intensive uses while en- couraging newer , generally more intensive uses, the use ofa concept known as the "wavy line" concept may be ap- propriate. This concept will encourage retention of the zoning for the less intensive use until demand dictates a change of zoning for the more intensive use while clearly supporting that future change when the time is appropri- ate. Factors to consider in the timing of these changes will include existing development, property ownership, development potential, access and related physical fea- tures, and compliance with zoning and General Plan stand- ards and policies. (As an example, an area designated by the General Plan for commercial use should be granted consistent zoning when contiguous property in the- transi- tion area is under the same ownership and can be devel- oped in a compatible manner; but, when such property, although contiguous, is in anotherownership and is developed with a less intensive use, such as a residence, or is vacant, zoning may be withheld until the time is right for the more intensive commercial use. ) " 5. Make changes to the 1980 Atascadero General Plan Map as shown on the attached exhibit, which�is made a part hereof by reference, entitled "Recommended Land Use Changes to the Morro Road Study Area. " 2 RESOLUTION NO. 4-82 On motion by Commissioner and seconded by Commissioner ,the foregoing resolution is adopted in its entirety by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES : ABSTAIN: DATE ADOPTED: SHIRLEY MOORE, Chairman ATTEST: LAWRENCE STEVENS , Planning Director APPROVED AS TO FORM: ALLEN GRIMES, City Attorney 3 R�rA« M oR R 0 R oA O �i�►a�R�iac. _ STUD � /4�Ei4 M a MOLT/PLE tj: LAN® tJSF P� TJ�•E/�/v b' � P/�c��ssrowAG MooERATE o 0 or Gl6N7' CcvyivjE2�/�L' o"T � �'R©f;Ess/awAL . • �trRt` .0 Y Y GiG<tr Co MMIFA C14-4- rl:M1 lorlMFi2G/�L, Minutes - Planning Comission - 2/16/82 MOTION: Commissioner Sherer moved to expand the Retail Commer- cial at the southeast corner of Curbaril and Morro Road southerly to include Moore' s Nursery. Commissioner LaPrade seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. MOTION: Commissioner lilley moved to support their previous recommendation with reference to expanding the General Plan text desiring light retail commercial uses. Commis- sioner Carroll seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. 2. Consideration of Staff Report concerning referral ack to Planning Commission for Conditional Use' Permit U811 0:1 for ditional signing for Northern California Savings at 7379 El Camino Real - Northern California Savings (M Carthy and Bra Architects) Mr. Stevens resented the Staff Report on this mat er and noted that conditi s for approval have been included for the smaller sign that wa submitted after the appeal r quest by the applicants. Mike Brady, represe ting the applicant, spoke n support of the request and concur d with the Findings and Conditions listed in the Staff Report. • It was the consensus of t e Commission tha the existing signing adequately identified th savings an loan use, that the prior approval by the County was n t sufficien grounds to allow the requested sign, that addit nal sign ng in the center would de- tract from its current attract ' a appe ranee, and that a new sign identifying an individual ten t ight lead to similar future requests. MOTION: Commissioner Carroll move t support the Commission' s previous recommendation in enial of Conditional Use Permit U7811130 :1. Co mission r Lilley seconded the motion and it Carrie with Cha rman Moore dissenting. D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Consideration of Staff eport on conformity with eneral Plan on various capital im ovement projects proposed r Atasca- dero Lake. The Planning Director pr sented the Staff Report recommendin that the projects be deemed i conformance with the General Plan. 4 Minutes - Planning Co*ission - 2/16/82 • MOTION: Commissio Sherer moved o adopt issuance of a Con- ditional Neg 've De aration and approval of Tentative Parcel Map AT 811 ` •1 subject to Conditions 1-10 as listed in th Sta e ort. Commissioner LaPrade seconded the otion and it cawed unanimously. C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Consideration of Staff Report concerning referral back to Planning Commission of General Plan Amendment GP811019: 2 (Morro Road Study Area) Chairman Moore stepped down from the Commission due to a possible conflict of interest. Mr. Stevensexplained that this matter had been referred back to the Commission to comment further on three points raised by the Council. Mal Biging, property owner on Morro Road, felt that more clari- fication should be provided on what types of uses should be per- mitted in the Commercial-Professional land use designation. Don Moore, owner of Moore' s Nursery, noted his concern that if • Alternative #2 was approved, that his business would then become a nonconforming use. Manford Vanderlip, area property owner , felt that in relation to the "wavy line concept" the lines should be more specifically delineated and commented that this concept should be abandoned. Shirley Moore stated that if the "wavy line" is abandoned, that the text would not allow for single family residences on Navajoa. John Nelson commented on the "wavy line concept and asked what effect this would have on a property owner who might have some property that he would like to develop on Navajoa in relation to access onto Morro' Road. The Planning Director explained the method of applying the concept. Commissioner Lilley felt that by becoming so restrictive, the Gen- eral Plan Amendment could -turn into a type of zoning ordinance. MOTION: Commissioner Summers moved to refer the "wavy line con- cept" to Staff to consider specific language to implement this concept and to bring it back to the meeting of March 1, 1982 for consideration. Commissioner Carroll seconded the motion and it carried with Commissioners LaPrade and Sherer dissenting. 3 u ' 79• CITY OF ATASCADERO pais ' ,tea ia / s � EBo Planning Department March 1, 1982 STAFF REPORT i SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT GP 811019:2 (Morro RoadStudy) LOCATION: Morro Road between Highway 101 and Portola APPLICANT:. Initiated by PlanningCommission REQUEST: To consider text and map amendments of the Land Use Element BACKGROUND On February 16, 1982 the Planning Commission resolved two of the three matters referred back by City Council expanding the Retail Commercial to Moore' s Nursery and leaving the light retail commercial description as originally recommended. The Commission directed Staff to review the "wavy line" concept and prepare explanatory language for possible inclusion in the General Plan. STAFF COMMENTS There has been considerable discourse of this matter and detailed com- ments seem unnecessary. The following text is suggested to provide a description of the wavy line. If approved, the text should be added as Land Use Policy Proposal No. 9 (page 58) . 19 . The Land Use Map of the General Plan is not a specific diagram, especially in areas where there is a transition between different types of land uses, such as residential adjacent to commercial. Since the transition will occur over a period of time and since it is desirable to protect existing, generally less intensive uses while encouraging newer, generally more intensive uses, the use of a concept known as the "wavy line" concept may be appro- priate. This concept will encourage retention of the zoning for the less intensive use until demand dictates a change of zoning for the more intensive use while clearly supporting that future change when the time is appropriate. Factors to consider in the timing of these changes will include existing development, prop- erty ownership, development potential, access and related physi- cal features, and compliance with zoning and General Plan stand- ards and policies. (As an example, an area designated by the General Plan for commercial use should be granted consistent zon- ing when contiguous property in the transition area is under the • General Plan Amendment GP 811019:2 (Morro Road) same ownership and can be developed in a compatible manner; but, when such property, although contiguous, is in another ownership and is developed with a less intensive use, such as a residence, or is vacant, zoning may be withheld until the time is right for the more intensive commercial use. ) " The Commission may desire to modify this wording. In addition, the Commission may also decide to abandon the use of the "wavy line con- cept in which case the Land Use Map should be changed accordingly. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Department recommends approval of the wording suggested above explaining .the "wavy line" concept. ACTION Adopt amended Resolution. REPORT PREPARED/APPROVED BY: �-15 LAWRENCE STEVENS Planning Director /Ps 2 y7 cIF r:` ist CITY OF ATASCADERO r CAI) Planning Department February 16, 1982 STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT GP 811019: 2 (Morro Road Study) LOCATION: Morro Road between Highway 101 and Portola APPLICANT: Initiated by Planning Commission REOUEST: To consider text and map amendments of the Land Use Element BACKGROUND On January 18 , 1982, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 4-82 approving various land use and text changes in the Morro Road Studv Area after having conducted public hearings on November 16 , December 7 and December 21. On January 25, 1982, the City Council conducted a public hearing and determined that the proposed General Plan Amendment should be referred back to the Planning Commission for report and comment on three issues (See attached Council minutes) : 1) Expand the Retail Commercial at the southeast corner of Curbaril and Morro southerly to include Moore' s Nursery; and, 2) Reconsider use of the "wavy line concept especially along_ Navajoa; and, 3) Expand -the General Plan text for Liqht Retail Commercial. STAFF COMMENTS The Planning Commission is required to review the matters and report its recommendation back to City Council on each issue. The Commission can support its previous recommendation, modify it, or take no action. Comments on the recommendation are appropriate. Expansion of Retail Commercial south of Curbaril : The subject area is designated in the recommended changes as Re- tail Commercial at the corner area with Commercial-Professional along the remainder of the Morro Frontage. Discussions at the various hearings indicated that the Precise location of the line Page Two • Re: General Plan Amendment GP 811019 : 2 February 16, 1982 between the two designations would be determined by the zoning since the General Plan line was approximate. Factors to be con- sidered in establishing a zoning line would be property ownership (i.e. an ownership would not be split) , existing development and use, topography and similar features . Council is concerned that .the existing nursery would not be appropriate as light retail com- mercial but would be appropriate as a retail commercial use. The Planning Commission can either amend the map to expand the Retail Commercial area to be shown on the map or, in lieu thereof, could specify the method of establishing the zoning line from the General Plan Land Use map. The latter may be a good approach in anv event. "Wavy Line" Concept: The recommendation to use an indefinite line to establish the boundaries in the transitional area between the Morro Road commer- cial and Navajoa residential was based on a desire to create a reasonable buffer between the different types of uses . It was intended to rezone the Morro Road frontage with rezoning along Navajoa to be on a case by case basis as development was ready to occur. It was also based on the philosophy that the general plan lines were less specific than zoning lines with considera- tion towards the future of eliminating local streets from the land use map. It should be noted that the General Plan previously allowed single family residences as a permitted use to avoid the potential problem of non-conformity. We had decided to employ the so-called "wavy line concept" to minimize this problem. It appears that Council ' s primary concern with this approach is not sufficiently adequate as a guideline to property owners. Furthermore, there is potential for abuse in the application of this concept. Staff' s judgement is that the approach is still meritorious. As an alternative, it may be preferable to provide criteria for in- terpreting the concept as opposed to eliminating the concept. The only other available approach is to simply change the General Plan designation to correspond to the straight line. Expand the General Plan text for Light Retail Commercial : There is no designation of what is meant by Light Retail Commer- cial in the adopted text amendment. Several alternatives have been recommended in the attached Staff Report which was previously considered by the Commission. Re-evaluation of these alternatives is appropriate. Page Three Re: General Plan Amendment GP 811019 :2 • February 16 , 1982 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends no change from the previous action on General Plan Amendment GP 811019 : 2. ACTION Direct Staff by motion as deemed appropriate. REPORT PREPARED/APPROVED BY: LAWRENCE STEVENS �! ' Planning Director /Ps MINUTES - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL JANUARY 25, 1982 • 2. "-'Public hearing on General Plan Amendment GP 810930:1 �ANorth El `Camino Real Commercial Study Area) ; area bounded by El Camino'-Real, San Anselmo, Highway 101 and Del Rio; Steve Gasman/Expanded area initiated by Planning Commission; to consider certa-in General Plan text and map amendments for the Study Area Larry Stevens reviewed the--Gjarman request ,for a change from High Density Multiple Family Residential. to Retail Commercial. He outlined the Planning Commission' s considerati n'in approving the request. Mayor Wilkins opened the matter to public hearing. Comments were heard from Ted Clemens, Norman Munson, Joe Walters, Herb LaPrade,_ and _ Manford Vanderlip. Mr._,Walters was opposed to zoning which would al- - low restaurants in--the area Mr. LaPrade and Mr."`Vanderlip felt that the zoning ordinance should be adopted before this wast-changed. Councilmembers discussed this briefly and agreed that it was an appropriate change. MOTION: Councilman Highland moved that Council approve the change in concept and direct Staff to prepare a resolution for Council adoption of this change. The motion was seconded by Council- man Nelson and unanimously carried by roll call vote,- • 3. Public hearing on General Plan Amendment GP 811019: 2 (Morro Road Study) ; Morro Road between Highway 101 and Portola: ini- tiated by Planning Commission; to consider amendment of the text and map of the Land Use Element concerning the Special Commercial and Professional Office land use designation Councilman Stover excused himself from participation in this mat- ter because of owning property in the area. Mr . Stevens reviewed the Staff report outlining Planning Commis- sion recommendation for approval of text changes todeletethe Profes- sional Office and Special Commercial land use designations and estab- lish a new land use designation of Commercial-Professional. Comments were heard from Arthur Jazwiecki, Don Moore, Shirley Moore, Norman Munson and Manford Vanderlip. The Moores were concerned because their nursery on Morro Road was in the Commercial-Professional category which did not specifically include nurseries in the defini- tion. They requested that the Retail Commercial category just west of their property be extended to include the nursery. There was discussion regarding the Moore' s property and the "wavey" line concept which Councilmembers felt should be more defi- nite. MOTION: Councilman Highland moved that this matter be retuned to the Planning Commission with a recommendation that they include the Retail Commercial hatching on Curbaril and Morro Road westwardly to include Moore' s Western Nursery; and that the line between the proposed zoning uses down the entire length 3 MINUTES - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL - JANUARY 25, 1982 of Navajoa be better defined. The motion was seconded by • Councilman Nelson and unanimously carried. It was noted that the Council was not in favor of the "wavey" line concept as designating general zoning areas boundaries. They pre- ferred precise location of different zones. MOTION: Councilman Highland moved that the text on the Light Retail Commercial uses be expanded. The motion was seconded by Councilman Nelson and unanimously carried. 4. Report regarding San Luis Obispo Area Council of Governments agenda Mr. Warden reviewed the agenda for the SLO COG special meeting of February �4,th. He stated that the Needs definition had been discussed by TTAC the 'previous Friday and Council was in receipt of their recom- mendation on that matter . ff F MOTION: Councilman Highland moved that Council direct the City' s representative to SLO COG to support the definition as pre- sented. The,.�motion was seconded by Councilman Nelson and unanimously carried. C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Ordinance No. 48 establishing the Office of City Clerk first reading Mr. Warden reviewed the proposed ordinance. He stated that the duties of City, Clerk and,City Treasurer are generally outlined in the Government Code, but that Council could determine other duties if so desired. Council also.,.---needs to determine compensation for these posi- tions. He reviewed various practices in other cities in the County. Compensation ranges`, from $1 or $25 per month to $1 per year in some cases. X MOTION: Councilman Nelson moved that Ordinance No. 48 be read by title ' only. The motion was seconded by Councilman Highland and unanimously carried " May ' Wilkins read Ordinance No. 48 by title only. MOTION: Councilman Nelson moved that this constitute the first reading of Ordinance No. 48. The motion was seconded.,by Councilman Mackey and unanimously carried by roll call vote-. 4 [Minutes - Ataseadero Planning Commission - Regular Meeting December 21 1981 Page Three 4. Continued public hearing on General Plan Amendment GP 811019 :2 to consider changes to the text and map concern- ing the Special Commercial and Professional Office areas along Morro Road Initiated by Planning Commission Chairman Moore stepped down to a potential conflict of interest. The Planning Director presented the Staff Report on this con- tinued matter. Mr. Stevens presented several alternatives for consideration. Art Jazqiecki asked for clarification on Morro Road and Portola intersection with regard to retail commercial uses in the area. Dannis Dakos, property owner on Morro Road, asked if multi- family dwellings would be eliminated .if alternative #2 is adopted. Martin Polin, property owner on Morro Road, asked that his property not be divided with two different types of uses and commented on the alternatives mentioned in the Staff Report. Doug Lewis expressed concern over Morro Road becoming predom- inantly a tourist generated strip and supported a use theme for the area. Manford Vanderlip, property owner on Morro Road, asked what provisions are made for the existing uses if they should become non-conforming,. He concurred with Alternative #2 listed in the Staff Report. Gerald Daniel, Amapoa resident, commented on the traffic along Morro Road. Mr. Daniel felt that hotels and restaurants would be an inconsistent use and favored professional office and fine arts uses along Morro Road, Art Jazwiecki stated that if there are not enough commercial uses allowed on Morro Road to accommodate the residential dev- elopment in that area, more traffic will be funneled to the downtown area. John Nelson, property owner on Morro Road, concurred with Mr. Jazwiecki and Mr. Vanderlip ' s comments and indicated his agree- ment to Alternative #2 . There was discussion among the Commission pertaining to the traffic on Morro Road with regard to congestion and consider- ation of utilizing some of the lesser traveled streets. Minutes Atascadero Planning Commission Regular Meeting December 21, 1981 Page Four MOTION Commissioner Wentzel moved to approve the Staff recommendation deleting the Special Commercial and Professional Office land use designations and cre- ating a new designation entitled Commercial-Profes- sional and to amend the land use map as shown on Alternative #2 in the Staff Report. Commissioner LaPrade seconded the motion and it carried with Commissioner Summers dissenting. Chairman Moore returned to her seat on the Commission. CHAIRMAN MOORE CALLS A TEN MINUTE BREAK FROM 10 :00 TO 10 :10 P.M. Continued public hearing on General Plan Amendment G 810930 :1 including the North El Camino Real Study ea tconsider changes in the text and land use map Gar n/Expanded area initiated by Planning Comm' sion Commissione Wentzel stepped down from the Commi ion due to a potential c flict of interest._ Mr. Stevens prese ted the Staff Report on this matter which • had been continued rom the previous meeti Mr. Stevens explained the report as modified to sepa ate the alternatives into two categories. Nick Dejong, Chairman of e- Economi Development Committee from the Chamber of Commerc spok on the matter. He favored retail commercial use from Sa An elmo to Chapel of the Roses and service commercial from Cha 1 of the Roses to Del Rio. Lee Gustafson, E1 Camino Rea res' ent, asked if .a retail boat store use would be similar o an au sale agency with regard to a large lotusefor c hercial par . The Planning Director ointed out the ty s of uses that would be compatible with e land use designatio and the proper addressing of the ses through the zoning to t. Wally Dunn sta d he would like to see the nort part of Atas cadero develo ed to its full potential and favor retail commercial the area of San Anselmo and service mmercial from Chape of the Roses to Del Rio. John D , representing Dillingham Investments , explaine his firm' intention to develop a community shopping center i the are of San Anselmo and El Camino Real. Mr. Jay was in fa r o retail commercial that would be appropriate for developme f the shopping center and concurred with Staff ' s recommend ti _0 r 1��, ,G w� G2 79 CITY OF ATASCADERO Planning Department December 21, 1981 STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: General Plan Amendment GP 811019: 2 APPLICANT: Initiated by Planning Commission REQUEST: To consider amendment of the text and map of the Land Use Element concerning the Special Commercial and Pro- fessional Office land use designations The public hearing on this General Plan Amendment for the Morro Road Study Area was continued from the meeting of November 16, 1981 and December 7, 1981 order to allow consideration of options for consid- eration of options for additional commercial uses. BACKGROUND . 1. Introduction and Reason for Study: The General Plan currently provides two separate land use designations along portions of both sides of Morro Road (Highway 41) from Sang Andres to Portola; the designations being Special Commercial generally on the east side and Professional Office generally on the west. In interpreting and implementing the general plan, difficulties have arisen due to the overlapping and conflicting nature of the defini- tions and policies of these two designations. Further difficulties have resulted from the underlying zoning, however, these particular problems can be addressed during the proposed rezoning program. 2. Prior Action: On October 19 , 1981 Staff proposed to the Planning Commission that consideration be given to reviewing the General Plan text and the land use designations along Morro Road. The Study Area is shown on the maps attached to this report. Generally, the Study Area encompasses the property fronting Morro Road and extending behind Morro Road one block on each side from Marchant and Santa Ynez near the U.S. Highway 101 overpass to Portola Road. 3. General Plan: The following are the excerpts from the General Plan for the two land . use designations in question: 1 General Plan Amendmeo GP 811019: 2 . Special Commercial A Special Commercial use category is proposed for certain proper- ties and blocks fronting on Morro Road between Highway 101 and Portola Road. Access to properties shall be from an arterial only with establishment of a continuous left turn lane. This use cate- gory shall provide for the following groups of commercial uses a. Offices, business and professional b. Personal services C. Motels d. Financial uses e. Specialty commercial uses requiring smalil space needs and which are low traffic generators (e.g. , florist, stationery and gift shops) f. Public utility offices Professional Offices A Professional Office category is proposed along the west side of Morro Road between CUrbaril Avenue and San Andres Road. Access to properties shall be from an arterial only. Uses proposed for this category include: a. Professional offices b. Single family dwellings C. Public parks and playgrounds d. Home occupations e. Personal services f. Public utility offices 4. Environmental Determination The land use changes proposed are not considered to be major changes and the Planning Department feels that minor adverse impacts can be mitigated through various implementing policies that can be incorporated into the General Plan and through stand- ards and criteria for development within the zoning ordinance. Therefore, the Planning Director has prepared a Conditional Nega- tive Declaration indicating the proposed land use changes will not have a significant adverse effect upon the environment and the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report is not necessary. STAFF COMMENTS General Plan Text Analysis In comparing the aforementioned excerpts, one notes the following ob- vious areas of overlap or similarity: 2 General Plan Amendme*GP 811019: 2 Offices; professional Personal services Public utility offices The access required from an arterial (Morro Road) only while ess o vious areas -of similarity include: Business offices Financial Uses Home occupations Areas of inconsistency and contradiction include the following: 1. Exception to the arterial access restriction is made for the Special Commercial uses (" . . .only with establishment of a continuous left turn lane. ") 2. Special Commercial uses are permitted only if they are "low traffic generators" (even though the properties front on Morro Road, designated an arterial and designed accordingly to handle high traffic volumes) . 3. Provision for single-family dwellings in conjunction with commercial/office uses. 4. The underlying R-4 zoning in the SpecialCommercialland use would not permit retail commercial. • General Plan Intent: Analyzing these problems brings out the basic question of determining the intent in attempting to create two distinct land uses for each side of Morro Road. Was it to accommodate uses already in existence, or to incorporate uses already permitted by a variety of underlying zonings (CH, Highway Commercial; CR, Resort Commercial; C-1-N, Neigh- borhood shopping; and R-4 Multiple Family and Professional) . Perhaps the real intent for the Morro Road strip was to create an area dif- ferent from the "downtown"commercial atmosphere, to create an area for professional and business office growthorientedtoward Morro Road frontage and away from the predominantly single-family areas "behind (east and west) of Morro Road, and to create an. area of low intensity businesses that would perhaps have a less negative effect on the sur- rounding residential uses. Existing Land Uses: Existing land uses in the study area are a mixture, including: - single family residential - multiple family residential • - retail commercial - service commercial - offices 3 General Plan Amendma GP 811019: 2 vacant land Refer to the Existing Land Use map attached to this report for a pre- cise distribution of these uses. Commercial Considerations There is little question that commercial uses could be compatible with Morro Road as it is a heavily traveled arterial and that appropriate buffering techniques can be employed to encourage a compatible rela- tionship with adjacent residential areas. However , there are ques- tions concerning the need for additional commercial land, especially in the smaller lot sizes that dominate this area, and concerning the desirability of creating a commercial strip along Morro Road which would be similar to that along El Camino Real. The light commercial uses suggested in the attachment appear to be typical of a neighborhood commercial category but a strip of this sort seems excessive for the surrounding population would likely drain some activity from the El Camino Real area. Certainly, a decision of this sort is hampered by the lack of an economic analysis of current and future retail needs. Therefore, the Planning Director has prepared a Conditional Negative Declaration indicating the proposed land use changes will not have a • significant adverse effect upon the environment and the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report is not necessary. Alternatives Consideration of various alternatives for the Morro Road area can be broken into two categories those being "text changes" and "land use patterns" as follows. Text Changes : Alternative #1 - Make no changes in the Professional Office or Special Commercial text. This alternative would continue the existing overlapping and sometimes confusing situation and would allow for very limi- ted commercial uses . Alternative #2 - Modify the Professional Office and/or Special Com- mercial text but only to clarify the overlapping and inconsistent provisions of each. Example: "A Special Commercial category is proposed for portions of Morro Road. Access to properties shall be from an arterial to mitigate land use and traf- fic conflicts with adjacent residential areas. • Uses 'shall include offices , personal services , financial uses, and specialty commercial (requiring small space needs and generating light traffic) . " 4 General Plan AmendmeGP 811019:2 "A Professional Office category is proposed for • portions of Morro Road. Access to properties shall be from an arterial to mitigate land use and traffic conflicts with adjacent residential areas. Uses shall include offices and personal services. " Alternative #3 - Merge the Professional Office and Special Commer- cial designations into one allowing all of the uses now listed in the text including offices, specialty commercial, motels, etc. Some clari- fication of the arterial access requirement should be made. Alternative #4 - Create a new Professional designation to replace Professional office and Special Commercial. Example: "A Professional category is proposed for portions of Morro Road. Access to properties shall be from an arterial to mitigate land use and traffic con- f icts with adjacent residential areas. Uses shall include offices, cultural or fine arts institutions personal services and multiple family dwellings. " Alternative #5 - Create a new Light Commercial-.. Professional (or similar) designation to replace Professional Office • and Special Commercial. This would be intended to accommodate the request for additional commercial opportunities in the area. Example: "A Light Commercial - Professional category is proposed for portions of Morro Road. Access to properties shall be from an arterial to mitigate land use and traffic conflicts -with adjacent resi- aential land uses. Uses shall include: A. Offices B. Cultural or fine arts institutions C. Personal Services D. Light Commercial uses. In considering each of the above alternatives, minor variations of each are possible. Multiple family dwellings could be added to Alter- natives 2 , 3 , and 5 or deleted from Alternative 4 . The arterial access wording could be revised slightly or even deleted. Light Commercial could be defined more specifically. With regard to the latter, consideration can be given to the following examples: Light retail commercial uses. Developments shall generally be a number of clustered retail shop, none of which serve as a primary (or anchor) tenant and all of which have similar floor area. • Developments consisting of a market, department store or similar freestanding development are to be discouraged. 5 General Plan Amendm� GP811019 :1 - Specialty commercial uses in clustered shops oriented to serving local and tourist needs . • - Light retail commercial uses oriented towards serving the needs of tourists using Atascadero-Lake and the State Highway and oriented towards serving a variety of community needs including restaurants , small or clustered retail shops (clothing, small appliance, jewelry) and specialty commercial (stationery, florist arts and crafts) Land Use Patterns Alternative #1 - No change in the map. The Morro Road area would remain essentially as planned with Special Commer- cial and Professional Office development along the Morro Road corridor (A map has not been prepared for this alternative) . Alternative #2 - Makes provision for Retail Commercial near to 101 and Portola probably tourist oriented. Also shows Retail Commercial at Curbaril probably neighborhood oriented. Remaining Morro Road frontage to be Professional or Light Commercial-Professional transitioning to residential on the westerly side. Alternative #3 - Change entire strip along Morro Road from 101 to Portola to Retail Commercial, (A map has not been • prepared for this alternative. ) Alternative #4 -- Change entire strip along Morro Road from 101 to Portola to Professional or Light Commercial-Pro- fessional. (A map has not been prepared for this alternative. ) Again, it is conceivable that several of these patterns can be mixed to reach a final conclusion. For example, the triangle bounded by Atascadero, San Andres, and Navajoa could also be allowed a commercial or professional status. The southwesterly corner of Santa Ynez and Morro Road could retain its existing High Density Multiple designation, In addition, the Retail Commercial could be stopped short of the Atascadero-San Andres intersection, FINDINGS 1. Amendment to the General Plan as proposed will not result in any significant adverse environmental impact as long as appropriate mitigation measures are introduced. 2. The Nand use designations of Special Commercial and Professional Office as currently presented in the General Plan create certain difficulties in implementing the plan due to their overlapping • and inconsistent nature. 6 General Plan Amendme*GP 811019 :2 3. The proposed land use changes provide a clearer basis for imple • mentation and encourage a sound long range guide for land development. 4. Development opportunities are not significantly altered and eco- nomic potential is relatively unchanged. RECOMMENDATION Based upon the above findings, the Planning Department recommends: A) Issuance of a Conditional Negative Declaration as follows: 1. Consideration of individual site and related site charac- teristics and the potential impacts associated therewith shall be done in conjunction with future zoning and environ- mental reviews for detailed development projects. 2. Appropriate traffic circulation shall be maintained by re- quiring access to an arterial only in the case of commercial development to reduce conflicts with adjacent residential development; and B) Approval of General Plan Amendment GP 811019: 2 as follows: • 1. Delete from page 71 of the 1980 Atascadero General Plan text the section entitled "Special Commercial. " 2. Delete from pages 71 and 72 of the 1980 Atascadero General Plan text the section entitled "Professional Office. " 3. Add as an insert to page 71 the section entitled "Corer- cial-Profe'ssi:onal as follows "This land use designation provides for the following general categories of uses: a. Offices; professional, business , medical, financial and utility b. Cultural or fine arts institutions C. Personal services (not supported by retail sales of goods) d. Light retail commercial uses. • 7 General Plan Amendme#, GP 811019 :2 These categories of uses should be encouraged along arterials or major collectors where high traffic volumes can be accom- modated and in areas where a compatible transition is desired adjacent to single family areas. Access through residential areas shall be discouraged. 4 . Make the changes to the-1980 Atascadero General Plan Map as shown on the attached Ex ibit Map entitled "Recommended Land Use Changes to the Morro Road Study Area. " ACTION The Planning Commission should by motion direct Staff as deemed appropriate. REPORT PREPARED/APPROVED BY: LAWRENCE STEVENS Planning Director /Ps 8 PROPOSED LIGHT CCMMERCIAL AND SPECIAL COMMERCIAL USES ON MORRO ROAD AS DELINEATED ON THE ATTACHED `• MAF I . Retail Sales : including Appliance Stores , Bakeries Book. Stores , Clothing Stores , Department Stores, Florists, Food Markets, Furniture Stores Hardware Stores , Hobby Shops , Jewelry Stores, Liquor Stores, Garden Shops and Nurseries Pet. Shops and Supplies , Photo Stores, Shoe Stores, Sporting Goods, Stationery Supplies, and Variety Stores. II. Professional : including Accountants, Attorneys, Medical Professions, Real Estate Office's, Surveyors. III . Financial:- including Banks, Loan Companies , Title and Escrow Companies IV. Services : including Broadcasting Stations, Barber and Beauty Shops, Childrens Nurseries , Cocktail Lounges , Dry Cleaners (distribution only) Employment Agencies , Laundromats , Motels, Public Utility Offices, Restaurants , Shoe Repair, Travel Agencies, Churches, Lodges. • V. Recreation: Bowling Alleys, Health Clubs, Recreation Centers. VI . Public Uses:, Civic Buildings, Fire Stations, Libraries , Parks, Police Stations, Post Offices, Public Offices. - VII. Other Uses-: Those Light Commercial and Special Commercial uses which the Planning Commission determines are of the same general character as those enumerated in this subsection and that are not obnoxious to abutting properties or detrimental to the district in which located. � �� _ � � 7 � Vt�or��.- ! �! n1, �r I� C i a I � � M � N• •.,. �,. • � .• � _ �t�, Y � r > > �,. � 's�� � A i Gjrti�.�, � � ` � , � , r J.c �� � �� .� ��L � �!j � 'r �� , \ ;� icy � �� r � � r II � '� �'= 4 � � C �. ,r ,r L� � ►���►rr � Y�' i' y� 7j -��� �� � :GGk �\ ;L �, �� � ` �� . ,�= � ' ' � �1 Vis$ � i � ��� , � � � , 'y;. i, - � �. `� � �� � � ` � G �-� , ��oa1E' �� -. v � , , ��. �' ,i �� ;, t .� . �:� � �. . i �'�Y r �' L� �� � I i � ' �7 i' �i•��i� 1 r i ', a � i • .� Y i � �� � ® tea. ♦ � - ®R • �. ' � � � ® SCS#��� � �� ••`s••� 0 Fant-N.,23"; t$ ~t$ ®® R lull PRO Mn No ■® • •.� . CorlM�i?�/�tL MORA 0 ROA O .e. H/6,q 'a , L AAJ p VSE P14 7716,a / ST.9FF P2UF,ESSioN•�1�. 0 /�Ioo��TE l�f�/ty S/n1Gt.� «y Y �MMER�lAL 'w+l. '^fit •'•'��. '�.._..��'►.1 ..� 1 t 1 3\ 1 1 y 4� � ti. .'a .,11-31 c. Lam•—'`•, • •y;•': ':^: t...fin t: r ,• `S +—..• •� ` t( '/ 00 41 ... .. .... :. ......... .. .. , r-ATASCADERO t coli/I.L P o-, GE ,TE:�,l�]-� PLAN LAND USE AND CIRCULATION ( y HIGH DENS.MULT.FAM Imo'�` HE�NY COMMERCIAL AGRICULTURE LOW DENS. MULT.F. . RE'AIL COMMERCIAL RECREATION HIGH DENS. SNGL.FAM. COMMERCIAL PARK SPECIAL RECREATION i MOD.DENS.SNGL.FAM. SPECIAL COMMERCIAL AR IERIAL OWED w ARTERIAL UNprviDED LOB! DENS.SNGL.FAM �NPROFESSIONAL OFFICE -. .., ODEAN SERV SUBURBAN SNGL FAM INDJSTRIAL PARK • URANREavices u'+E PUBLIC INDJSTRIAL UHDA�REO€FVE tu+E ._.._a _ CITY tr;i n:aARr 777 C-'�yE-.�-L PG4•y �-1 A� c yc�' � nGT r98/ Prof essiana./' ��c� ��ud y Friee� Planning Commission Mnutes - December 7, 1981 listed in the Staff Report. Commissioner Summers seco ded the motion and it carried unanimously. 7: 45 p.m. Commissioner Lilley is now present. 2. Public hear * on Tentative Parcel Map AT 810 0:1 to allow creation of th e lots from portions of ots 11,12, and 13 of Block 22 at 245 1 Camino Real Fr erick (Stewart) The Planning Director presente the St Report on this request to allow subdivision of 7 . 5 acres three parcels. Mr . Stevens noted the concern for erosion an r ' nage problems on the subject site. Dan Stewart, representat' e for the applican stated his agree- ment with Staff's rec mandation. MOTION: Commis 'oner Summers moved to adopt issuan of a Con- di ' nal Negative Declaration and approval Tentative rcel Map, AT 810930:1- subject to Conditions -18 as listed in the Staff Report. Commissioner Wentzel econ- ded the motion and it carried unanimously. 3. Continued public hearing on General Plan Amendment GP811019: 2 to consider changes in the text and map concerning the Spe- cial commercial and Professional Office areas along Morro i Road - Initiated by Planning Commission Chairman Moore stepped down from her seat on the Commission. Com- missioner Wentzel took the gavel. Larry Stevens noted this item was continued from the prior meeting to consider a series of alternatives in determining what type of uses should .be allowed along the Morro Road area. Commissioner Carroll stated that most of the people he had spoken with felt that because Morro Road is a State highway that multi- family designations should be limited and that more retail com- mercial should be allowed. There was discussion among the Commission concerning how much commercial should be allowed and what effects commercial would have on the Morro Road strip. Ken Cave, representing Jim Hernell of Income America, explained the efforts involved in proposing a motel along Morro Road. Mr . Cave stated that there are two pieces of property involved and, if Staff' s recommendation is approved, they would be split by two different land use designations. 2 Planning Commission Minutes - December 7, 1981 Gary Snowden, property owner on Morro Road, stated that he has an office available for rent and has been approached by prospective tenants to put in a light commercial use on the property. Jim Haun, property owner on Morro Road, stated he would like to see some more light commercial uses. He noted that most of the lots are small but some owners have talked about the possibility of combining them into larger parcels. Manford Vanderlip, area property owner , presented the Commission with a list of property owners in the area which he was represent- ing. He spoke on the efforts of the original Advisory Committee in trying to incorporate certain recommendations for commercial use along Morro Road into the General Plan. .He felt that multi- family uses should be limited and that retail commercial uses should be established along Morro Road. Don Messer , property owner on Morro Road, concurred with Mr . Van derlip' s comments that Morro Road should be allowed to establish more commercial uses. Malvin Biging, also a property owner on Morro Road, stated that since Morro Road is- a state arterial highway, if more commercial uses are developed, it will relieve E1 Camino Real from some of the burden with regard to traffic problems. Commissioner Summers commented that she would like to see a viable commercial area wherein each of the businesses support one another . There was further discussion among the Commission concerning the fact that, since Morro Road is a main collector and State Highway, multi-family uses should be limited. Discussion also centered on the feasibility of allowing more commercial uses as it relates to tourist travel and the potential revenues generated from that source. It was the Commission' s general consensus that a lighter type of commercial would be appropriate. Mr . Stevens stated that provisions for additional commercial could be made and said he would look into text modifications and land use patterns. Shirley Moore felt that because of the tourist travel along Morro Road, more commercial uses would be financially viable. MOTION: Commissioner Lilley moved to direct Staff to prepare a report to consider commercial options including text modifications for land use patterns and continue to the meeting of December 21, 1981. Commissioner Carroll seconded the motion and it carried with Commissioner Summers dissenting. 3 it r � r. CITY OF ATASCADERO SER®/ Planning Department December 7, 1981 STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: General Plan Amendment GP 811019 :2 APPLICANT: Initiated by Planning Commission REQUEST: To consider amendment of the text and map of the Land Use Element concerning the Special Commercial and Pro- fessional Office land use designations The public hearing on this General Plan Amendment for the Morro Road Study Area was continued from the meeting of November 16, 1981 in order to allow consideration of options for additional commercial uses. BACKGROUND 1. Introduction and Reason for Study: i The General Plan currently provides two separate land use designations along portions of both sides of Morro Road (Highway 41) from San Andres to Portola; the designations being Special Commercial generally on the east side and Professional Office generally on the west. In interpreting and implementing the general plan, difficulties have arisen due to the overlapping and conflicting nature of the defini- tions and policies of these two designations. Further difficulties have resulted from the underlying zoning, however , these particular problems can be addressed during the proposed rezoning program. 2. Prior Action: On October 19 , 1981 Staff proposed to the Planning Commission that consideration be given to reviewing the General Plan text and the land use designations along Morro Road. The Study Area is shown on the maps attached to this report. Generally, the Study Area encompasses the property fronting Morro Road and extending behind Morro Road one block on each side from Marchant and Santa Ynez near the U.S. Highway 101 overpass to Portola Road. 3. General Plan: The following are the excerpts from the General Plan for the two land use designations in question: • General Plan Amendme0GP 811019;2 Special Commercial A Special Commercial use category is proposed for certain proper- ties and blocks fronting on Morro Road between Highway 101 and Portola Road. Access to properties shall be from an arterial only with establishment of a continuous left turn lane. This use cate- gory shall provide for the following groups of commercial uses: a. Offices, business and professional b. Personal services C. Motels d. Financial uses e. Specialty commercial uses requiring- small space needs and which are low traffic generators (e.g. , florist, stationery and gift shops) f. Public utility offices Professional Offices A Professional Office category is proposed along the west side of Morro Road between Curbaril Avenue and San Andres Road. Access to properties shall be from an arterial only. Uses proposed for this category include; a. Professional offices b. Single family dwellings C. Public parks and playgrounds d. Home occupations e. Personal services f. Public utility offices STAFF COMMENTS General Plan Text Analysis: In comparing the aforementioned excerpts, one notes the following ob- vious areas of overlap or similarity: Offices; professional Personal services Public utility offices While the access required from an arterial (Morro Road) only, less obvious areas of similarity include: Business offices Financial Uses Home occupations . Areas of inconsistency and contradiction include the following: 2 General Plan Amendmto GP 811019 : 2 1. Exception to the arterial access restriction is made for the Special Commercial uses (" . . .only with establishment of a continuous left turn lane. ") 2. Special Commercial uses are permitted only if they are "low traffic generators" (even though the properties front on Morro Road, designated an arterial and designed accordingly to handle high traffic volumes) . 3. Provision for single-family dwellings in conjunction with commercial/office uses.- 4. The underlying R-4 zoning in the Special Commercial land use would not permit retail commercial. General Plan Intent: Analyzing these problems brings out the basic question of determining - the intent in attempting to create two distinct land uses for each side of Morro Road. Was it to accommodate uses already in existence, or to incorporate :uses already permitted by a variety of underlying zonings (CH, Highway Commercial; CR, Resort Commercial; C-1-N, Neigh- borhood shopping; and R-4 Multiple Family and Professional) . Perhaps the real intent for the Morro Road strip was to create an area dif- ferent from the "downtown" commercial atmosphere, to create an area for professional and business office growth oriented toward Morro Road frontage and away from the predominantly single-family areas "behind" (east and west) of Morro Road, and to create an area of low intensity businesses that would perhaps have - a less negative effect on the sur- rounding residential uses. Existing Land Uses: Existing land uses in the study area are a mixture, including: - single family residential multiple family residential - retail commercial - service commercial - offices vacant land Refer to the Existing Land Use map attached to this report for a pre- cise distribution of these uses. Alternatives: The following alternatives are available: i 3 General Plan Amendme0GP 8.11019:2 Alternative #1. Make no changes. Alternative #2. Retain the two Land Use designations (Special Commer- cial and Professional Office) and make minor changes in their definitions. Alternative #3. Merge the two definitions effectively eliminating the areas of overlap and assign- a new title to the land use designation, and modify the general plan map accordingly. Alternative #4. Combine the two land uses into one, eliminate both the areas of overlap and inconsistency by completely rewriting the definitions and policy statements, assign a new title to the land ; use designation and modify the general plan map accordingly. The first alternative is self explanatory. Making , no changes to the text or the map would simply promote the status quo. Alternative #2 suggests retaining Special Commercial and Professional Office as distinct land use designations but making minor changes in their definitions and possibly making minor location changes on the General Plan map. The minor changes might include: 1. Removal from one designation or both similar uses. 2. Rewording of inconsistent requirements or standards. i3. Modification of locations of the specified designations (e.g. changing the Special Commercial designation in the block between San Andres and Portola to Professional Office) Alternative #3 suggests merging the two land uses under one title (either retaining one of the existingtitles or assigning a completely different title). By merging the two designations, redundant uses would be eliminated as would the inherent discriminations resulting from conflicting wording of policies. Again, this alternative does not preclude the option of modifying the locations of the designation on the map. This alternative might include: 1. Land Use Title: Special Commercial 2. Suggested Uses: - Offices: professional, business , medical, financial, utility - Personal Services (not retail sales of goods) - Motels and hotels - Single Family Dwellings and Home Occupations Specialty commercial uses requiring small space needs and minimal storage needs (i .e. less than 1,500 square feet of gross floor area and not more than 20% of floor area for storage) . - Public Parks and playgrounds • 4 General Plan Amendm0 GP 811019: 2 3. Restrictions: Access to properties shall be from an arterial only to mitigate potential conflicts with adjacent single family neighborhoods 4. General Location: Proposed along Morro Road frontages between U.S. Highway 101 and the southwesterly end of Santa Ynez. The last alternative suggests a merging Special Commercial and Profes- sional Office and a more complete reorganization of the land use defi- nitions including comprehensive text and map changes. In this alter- native, the uses permitted would not be entirely determined by exist- ing uses or existing zoning. Changes advocated in this Alternative might directly include: 1. Land Use Title: Professional District 2. Suggested Uses: - Offices; professional, business , medical, financial, utility Studios, galleries, cultural or fine arts institutions - Personal Services (not retail sales of goods) - Multiple family dwellings 3. Restrictions: Access to properties shall be from an arterial only to mitigate potential land use and traffic conflicts with adjacent residential streets and neighborhoods. 4. General Location: Proposed along Morro Road from San Andres south to Santa Ynez on the west and to Portola on the east. As a result of the alternatives discussed above, certain map changes may be needed. The northerly portion of Morro Road adjacent to San Andres is fully developed with a fast food restaurant and service sta- tions which are generally oriented to Highway 101 and should probably be designated for Retail Commercial use. Treatment of the remainder of the Morro Road strip primarily depends on the revisions made to Special Commercial and Professional Office land use designations, if any. Consideration should be given to the several small pockets now desig- nated for residential use in order to develop a consistent land use pattern. These areas could, for example, be designated for Profes- sional or Commercial development and still be compatible with the ad- jacent single family areas by allowing multiple family uses in those categories. If that is done', however , it may be desirable to limit lots without arterial access only to multiple family development to avoid placing commercial type traffic on residential streets. 5 General Plan AmendmerwP 811019 :2 Commercial Considerations Comments made at the last meeting indicate that, at least at one time during General Plan reviews by the Atascadero Committee, there was support for a higher degree of light commercial uses as is represented by the attachment (this copy was recently provided to Staff) . That proposal did not end up in either the County or City adopted versions of the General Plan and, as a result, is only important in its his- torical perspective and as it may be an additional alternative for consideration now. There is little question that commercial uses could be compatible with Morro Road as it is a heavily traveled arterial and that appropriate buffering techniques can be employed to encourage a compatible rela- tionship with adjacent residential areas. However, there are ques- tions concerning the need for additional commercial land, especially in the smaller lot sizes that dominate this area, and concerning the desirability of creating a commercial strip along Morro Road which would be similar to that along E1 Camino Real. The light commercial uses suggested in the attachment appear to be typical of a neighborhood commercial category but a strip of this sort seems excessive for the surrounding population and would likely drain some activity from the El Camino Real area. Certainly, a decision of this sort is hampered by the lack of an economic analysis of - current and future retail needs. It has been noted that the recommendation may also result in excess land area for office and professional uses and this may be a valid criticism which has been tempered by the allowance of multi-family uses. These are generally deemed to be more compatible with offices than with retail commercial uses. However , in light of the direction by the Planning Commission, some consideration of commercial alternatives is necessary. The following additional alternatives are suggested for consideration: Alternative #5. Change some or all of the Morro Road area to Retail Commercial. Alternative #6 . Designate the Morro Road area for Retail Commercial but add it to the listing (see page 68) of Neighborhood Commercial areas. Alternative V. Define a limited range of light commercial uses and add it to Alternatives 2,3, or 4 discussed earlier in the report. The fifth alternative has been discussed to some degree in the intro- ductory remarks to this "Commercial Considerations" section and seems inconsistent with good practice because its strip commercial nature • would likely result in many of the same negative effects existing in portions of the El Camino Real commercial area (i.e. traffic conges- tion, lack of clustering, promotion of strip development, incompati 6 General Plan Amendmeo GP 811019 :2 bility with adjacent land uses, small lot commercial development) . While several smaller portions of the area are appropriate for retail commercial, much of it is not. Alternative #6 is a slightly less intensive version of the above al- ternative except that the range of commercial uses would be more limited ostensibly to relate better with adjacent residential " areas. Prior comments can also be applied to this approach. The seventh alternative suggests - expanding the language of three earlier alternatives to allow greater flexibility for commercial uses but to a lesser intensity than either the Retail or Neighborhood Commercial designations. Possible wording to accomplish this for each is as follows: Alternative #2 variation: The existing language allows "specialty commercial, etc." in Special Commercial but not in Professional Office. Either or both could be modified by adding the following to current text: "Light retail commercial uses. Developments shall generally be a number of clustered retail shops none of which serve as a primary (or another) tenant and all of which have similar floor area. Developments consisting of an individual retail use in a single building shall be discouraged. Retail uses shall generally be limited to serving neighborhood rather than community needs. " Alternative #3 variation: Modify proposed language on specialty commercial as deemed appropriate. One suggestion is as follows: "Specialty commercial uses in clustered shops oriented towards serving the needs of the neighborhoods. " Alternative #4 variation: To the Professional District add the language suggested in the original Alternative #3 or the Alter- native #2 or #3 variations above. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The land use changes proposed are not considered to be major changes and the Planning Department feels that minor adverse impacts can be mitigated through various implementing policies that can be incorpo- rated into the General Plan and through standards and criteria for development within the zoning ordinance. Therefore, the Planning Director has prepared a Conditional Negative Declaration indicating the proposed land use changes will not have a significant adverse effect upon the environment and the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report is not necessary. 7 General Plan Amendme*GP 811019:2 FINDINGS 1. Amendment to the General Plan as proposed will not result in any significant adverse environmental impact as long as appropriate mitigation measures are introduced. 2. The land use designations of Special Commercial and Professional Office as currently presented in the General Plan create certain difficulties in implementing the plan due to their overlapping and inconsistent nature. 3. The proposed land use changes provide a clearer basis for imple- mentation and encourage a sound long range guide for land development. 4. Development opportunities are not significantly altered and eco- nomic potential is relatively unchanged. RECOMMENDATION Based upon the above findings, the Planning Department recommends: A) Issuance of a Conditional Negative Declaration as follows: 1. Consideration of individual site and related site charac- teristics and the potential impacts associated therewith shall be done in conjunction with future zoning and environ- mental reviews for detailed development projects. 2. Appropriate traffic circulation shall be maintained by re- quiring access to an arterial only in the case of commercial development to reduce conflicts with adjacent residential development; and B) Approval of General Plan Amendment GP 811019:2 as follows: 1. Delete from page 71 of the 1980 Atascadexo General Plan text the section entitled "Special Commercial." N 2. Delete from pages 71 and 72 of the 1980 Atascadero General Plan text the section entitled "Professional Office. " 3. Add as an insert to page 71 the section entitled "Profes- sional" as follows: "This land use. designation provides for the following general categories of uses: a. Offices; professional, business , medical, financial and utility General Plan AmendmeTft GP 811019: 2 b. Studio, galleries and cultural or fine arts institutions C. Personal services (not supported by retail sales of • goods) d. Multiple family dwellings may also be permitted (if dev- eloped in a compatible manner) These categories of uses should be encouraged along arterials or major collectors where high traffic volumes can be accom- modated and in areas where a compatible transition is desired adjacent to single family areas. Access through residential areas shall be discouraged and properties without access to arterials or major collectors shall be limited to multiple family dwellings. 4. Make the changes to the 1980 General Plan Map as shown on the attached Exhibit Map entitled "Recommended Land Use Changes to the Morro Road Study Area. ACTION The Planning Commission should direct Staff as deemed appropriate. REPORT PREPARED BY: � MARY E. ATIE Associate Planner REPORT APPROVED BY: LAWRENCE STEVENS Planning Director /ps 9 X TO NI • �. �r • ♦ X44; • [sem • .r I \� �` 41 • � �; � , 1O ` J �~ � fie►- i '• � h V � � •r �r r _ __: .:• vs� • 1,-`1 '' \, 1 ,,T� � 4�� `` `.,' ; _ .����, ✓ \It �� 4 f. •Y� i d ami ^..... >` Y •'�.ram •l .. . • ........• . � ► `�- t . i : . .. .:.::::. ATA BC.A,.DE RO o� ' GENERAL PLAN MAP 2 LAND USE AND CIRCULATION HIGH DENS.MOLT FAM I\—`�' HEAVY COMMERCIAL AGRICULTURE LC DENS.MULT FAM RE-AIL COMMERCIAL RECREATION HIGH DENS. SNGL FAM. COMMERCIAL PARK SPECIAL RECREATION MOD DENS.SNGL.FAM. SPECIAL COMMERCIAL ARTERIAL ahDEo ARTERIAL LNWDED •�T_I LON DENS.SNGL.FAM. -•:'•••I PROFESSIONAL OFF-CE .. COLLESTORS .� SLBUR'PAN SNGL.FAM. ` NDJSTPIAL PARK —— —.—.—:- UR AN s RVCEs LINE FU°LIC r .� INDJSTRIAL _ i r[-: YE LINE G�u�-� Pt�'•y cy�cE e'->6T iyel speoa/ Ccm/rl�rciczl pr%y Pfssiar)a1 .��u.dy �he�� r gyp _ ,4 $ �aa INCORPORATED JULY 2.I9]9 13 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT CYCLE I 198Z (40 MORRO ROAD STUDY . L •':• RECOMMENDED LAND USE t • � A CHANGES TO THE MORRO •'•'•'• ••• `� ' \b �5 •o ROAD STUDY AREA KEYlz . 10 Z .� ►� 29 . . . �t z� :• PrOFe5Stnn"L �t IZ •:: : 10 30 3Z 4 . . . g 3 3 7 •:.•. . L •. . :: �� 2 21 a '.•.•. . : •. . . .•. Z 22 i 3 10 . . . ...•. A At!a 2 Z t g 7A f 10 .;.;. Z 9 10 5 4 Planning Commission inutes - November 16, 1981 MOTION: ssioner Lilley moved to adopt ance of a Condi- tional Declaration approval of Tentative . Parcel Map AT .ect to Conditions 1-20 as listed in the Report. Comms -c er Summers second- ed ion and it carried unanimously. 3. Public hearing on General Plan Amendment GP811019: 2 to con- sider changes in the text and map concerning the Special Commercial and Professional Office areas along Morro Road Chairman Moore stepped down from the Commission due to a possible conflict of interest. Shirley Summers took the chair for this hearing. Mrs. Beatie presented the Staff Report on this matter concerning the designations of Special Commercial and Professional Office along Morro Road. Norm Norton spoke in favor or increased retail and stated that there would not be demand for that many offices along the Morro Road strip. Mrs. Kinney objected to the zoning on the property bordering Cur- ` baril and Morro Road. Manfred Vanderlip, area property owner , showed the Commission a map of the Morro Road area which he stated was adopted by the Gen- eral Plan Committee for the Atascadero Advisory Committee. He pointed out the discrepancies between his map and the study area map and contended owners had made plans based on retail commercial uses. Lillian Killman, City resident, appeared and expressed her agree- ment with the recommendation of Staff. Dorothy Smith, Morro Road resident, commented on the apartments behind her property needing to be fenced to prevent children from crossing the property onto Morro Road. She also commented on the need to pave Amapoa Street. Jim Haun, City resident, stated he bought some property on Morro Road a few years ago with a light commercial intent. He felt that there is an imbalance between the Special Commercial and Profes- sional Office designations in that area. Elinor Dunham, property owner on Navajoa, commented on the drain- age problem along Morro Road and part of Navajoa. Dennis Dakos , property owner on Morro Road, asked why his property was left out of the study area. Mrs . Beatie stated the intent was to leave the property designated for high density multiple family use. . 3 Planning Commission Minutes - November 16, 1981 Al Sherman, Navajoa resident, asked about the zoning in that area. He did not feel that apartments were appropriate in the particular area, and commented on the drainage problem there. Grigger Jones inquired about setbacks in the R-4 zone. - He asked for clarification on reasoning behind restricting Morro Road access for some of the land uses. There was discussion among the Commission concerning the amount of professional office which currently exists along Morro Road. Mr . Stevens noted that an overall relationship of land uses should be considered throughout the City. Discussion also centered around the compatibility of multiple fam- ily dwellings and the need for commercial retail in the area. It was the Commission' s general consensus that the hearing should be continued in order to determine what the needs are for retail commercial uses. MOTION: Commissioner Lilley moved to 'continue the public hear- ing to the meeting of December 7th in order to direct Staff to explore additional criteria for retail commer- cial uses in the Morro Road area. Commisssioner LaPrade seconded the motion and it was carried unanimously. Chairman Moore took her place back on the Commission. CHAIRMAN MOORE CALLS A TEN MINUTE BREAK FROM 9 : 40 TO 9: 50 P.M. Public hearing on General -Plan Amendment GP 811019:1 to con ider permitted densities in Multiple Family Residen ' al Land uS, esignations Mr . Stevens pr ented the Staff Report on this ma er to consider different densit standards in the High and Density Multiple Family Residential 1a use designations. Mike O'Brien, City resident, xpressed concern over ambiguities in the General Plan and wi the ecommendation in determining what uses are permitted. Lydia Killman expressed cone n over th increased density which would allow more multiple ousing to be b ' " t `within single family residential areas. Norm Norton, rep senting the North County Contra oris Associa- tion, concurr with the recommendation presented. Marge M ey requested that the density remain unchanged the Gener Plan. ed Ebhardt described his efforts in researching factors to de - 4 191g 1 1978 b '� t} .caragrts CITY OF ATASCADERO CAA Planning Department November 16, 1981 i STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: General Plan Amendment GP 811019: 2 APPLICANT: Initiated by Planning Commission REQUEST To consider amendment of the text and, map of the Land Use Element concerning the Special Commercial and Pro- fessional Office land use designations BACKGROUND Introduction and Reason for Study: The General Plan currently provides two separate land use designations along portions of both sides of Morro Road (Highway 41) from San Andres to Portola; the designations being Special Commercial generally on the east side and Professional Office generally on the west. In • interpreting and implementing the general plan, difficulties have arisen due to the overlapping and conflicting nature of the defini- tions and policies of these two designations. Further difficulties have resulted from the underlying zoning, however , these particular problems can be addressed during the proposed rezoning program. Prior Action: On October 19, 1981 Staff proposed to the Planning Commission that consideration be given to reviewing the General Plan text and the land use designations along Morro Road. The Study Area is shown on the maps attached to this report. Generally, the Study Area encompasses the property fronting Morro Road and extending behind Morro Road one block on each side from Marchant and Santa Ynez near the U.S. Highway 101 overpass to Portola Road. General Plan: The following are the excerpts from the General Plan for the two land use designations in questions Special Commercial A Special Commercial use category is proposed for certain proper- ties and blocks fronting on Morro Road between Highway 101 and • Portola Road. Access to properties shall be from an arterial only with establishment of a continuous left turn lane. This use cate- gory shall provide for the following groups of commercial uses: General Plan Amendment GP 811019: 2 a. Offices, business and professional b. Personal services C. Motels d. Financial uses e. Specialty commercial uses requiring small; space needs and which are low traffic generators (e.g. , florist, stationery and gift shops) f. Public utility offices Professional Offices A Professional Office category is proposed along the west side of Morro Road between Curbaril Avenue and San Andres Road. Access to properties shall be from an arterial only. Uses proposed for this category include: a. Professional offices b. Single family dwellings C. Public parks and playgrounds d. Home occupations e. Personal services f. Public utility offices • STAFF COMMENTS General Plan Text Analysis: In comparing the aforementioned excerpts, one notes the following ob- vious areas of overlap or similarity: - Offices; professional - Personal services - Public utility offices - Access required from an arterial (Morro Road) only tlhile th? less obvious areas of similarity include: - Business offices - Financial Uses - Home occupations. Areas of inconsistency and contradiction include the following: 1. Exception to the arterial access restriction is made for the Special Commercial uses (" . . .only with establishment of a continuous left turn lane. ") 2. Special Commercial uses are permitted only if they are "low • traffic generators" (even though the properties front on Morro Road, designated an arterial and designed accordingly to handle high traffic volumes) . 2 General Plan Amendment GP 811019: 2 3. Provision for single-family dwellings in conjunction with • commercial/office uses. 4. The underlying R-4 zoning in the Special Commercial land use would not permit retail commercial. General Plan Intent: Analyzing these problems brings out the basic question of determining the intent in attempting to create two distinct land uses for each side of Morro Road. Was it to accommodate uses already in existence, or to incorporate uses already permitted by a variety of underlying zonings (CH, Highway Commercial; CR, Resort Commercial; C-1-N, Neigh- borhood shopping; and R-4 Multiple Family and Professional)? Perhaps the real intent for the Morro Road strip was to create an area dif- ferent from the "downtown" commercial atmosphere, to create an area for professional and business office growth oriented toward Morro Road frontage and away from the predominantly single-family areas "behind" (east and west) of Morro Road, and to create an area of low intensity businesses that would perhaps have a less negative effect on the sur- rounding residential uses. Existing Land Uses: Existing land uses in the study area are a mixture, including: • - single family residential - multiple family residential - retail commercial - service commercial - offices - vacant land Refer to the Existing Land Use map attached to this report for a pre- cise distribution of these uses. Alternatives: The following alternatives are available: Alternative #1. Make no changes. Alternative #2. Retain the two Land Use designations (Special Commer- cial and Professional Office) and make minor changes in their definitions. Alternative #3. Merge the two definitions effectively eliminating the areas of 'overlap and assign a new title to the land use designation, and modify the general plan map accordingly. • Alternative #4. Combine the two land uses into one, eliminate both the areas of overlap and inconsistency by completely rewriting the 3 General Plan Amendment GP 811019: 2 • definitions and policy statements, assign a new title to the land use designation and modify the general plan map accordingly. The first alternative is self explanatory. Making no changes to the text or the map would simply promote the status quo. Alternative #2 suggests retaining Special Commercial and Professional Office as distinct land use designations but making minor changes in their definitions and possibly making minor location changes on the General Plan map._ The minor changes might include: 1. Removal from one designation or both similar uses. 2. Rewording of inconsistent requirements or standards 3. Modification of locations of the specified designations (e.g. changing the Special Commercial designation in the block between San Andres and Portola to Professional Office) . Alternative #3 suggests" merging the two land uses under one title (either retaining one of the existing titles or assigning a completely different title) . By merging the two designations, redundant uses would be eliminated as would the inherent discriminations resulting from conflicting wording of policies. Again, this alternative does not preclude the option of modifying the locations of the designation • on the map. This alternative might include: 1. Land Use Title: Special Commercial 2. Suggested Uses: - Offices: professional, business, medical, financial, utility - Personal Services (not retail sales of goods) - Motels and hotels - Single Family Dwellings and Home Occupations - Specialty commercial uses requiring small space needs and minimal storage needs (i.e. less than 1,500 square feet of gross floor area and not more than 20% of floor area for storage) . - Public Parks and playgrounds 3. Restrictions: - Access to properties shall be from an arterial only to mitigate potential conflicts with adjacent single family neighborhoods 4. General Location: Proposed along Morro Road frontages between U.S. Highway 101 and the southwesterly end of Santa Ynez. The last alternative suggests merging Special Commercial and 'Profes- sional Office and a more complete reorganization of the land use defi- nitions including comprehensive text and map changes. In this alter- native, the uses permitted would not be entirely determined by exist- ing uses or existing zoning. Changes advocated in this 4lternative might directly include: 4 General Plan Amendment GP 811019: 2 1. Land Use Title: Professional District • 2. Suggested Uses: - Offices; professional, business, medical, financial, utility - Studios, galleries, cultural or fine arts institutions - Personal Services (not retail sales of goods) - Multiple family dwellings 3. Restrictions: Access to properties shall be from an arterial only to mitigate potential land use and traffic conflicts with adjacent residential streets and neighborhoods. 4. General Location: Proposed along Morro Road from San Andres south to Santa Ynez on the west and to Portola on the east. As a result of the alternatives discussed above, certain map changes may be needed. The northerly portion of Morro Road adjacent to San Andres is fully developed with a fast food restaurant and service sta- tions which are generally oriented to Highway 101 and should probably be designated for Retail Commercial use. Treatment of the remainder of the Morro Road strip primarily depends on the revisions made to Special Commercial and Professional Office land use designations, if any. Consideration should be given to the several small pockets now desig- • nated for residential use in order to develop a consistent land use pattern. These areas could, for example, be designated for Profes- sional or Commercial development and still be compatible with the ad- jacent single family areas by allowing multiple family uses in those categories. If that is done, however , it may be desirable to limit lots without arterial access only to multiple family development to avoid placing commercial type traffic on residential streets. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The land use changes proposed are not considered to be major changes and the Planning Department feels that minor adverse impacts can be mitigatedthroughvarious implementing policies that can be incorpo- rated into the General Plan and through standards and criteria for development within the zoning ordinance. Therefore, the Planning Director has prepared a Conditional Negative Declaration indicating the proposed land use changes will not have a significant adverse effect upon the environment and the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report is not necessary. 5 0 General Plan Amendment GP 811019: 2 . FINDINGS 1. Amendment to the General Plan as proposed will not result in any significant adverse environmental impact as long as appropriate mitigation measures are introduced. 2. The land use designations of Special Commercial and Professional Office as currently presented in the General Plan create certain difficulties in implementing the plan due to their overlapping and inconsistent nature. 3. The proposed land use changes provide a clearer basis for imple- mentation and encourage a sound long range guide for land development 4. Development opportunities are not significantly altered and eco- nomic potential is relatively unchanged. RECOMMENDATION Based upon the above findings , the Planning Department recommends: A) Issuance of a Conditional Negative Declaration as follows: • 1. Consideration of individual site and related site charac- teristics and the potential impacts associated therewith shall be done in conjunction with future zoning and environ- mental reviews for detailed development projects. 2. Appropriate traffic circulation shall be maintained by re- quiring access to an arterial only in the case of commercial development to reduce conflicts with adjacent residential development; and B) Approval of General Plan Amendment GP 811019: 2 as follows: 1. Delete from page 71 of the 1980 Atascadero General Plan text the section entitled "Special Commercial. ' 2. Delete from pages 71 and 72 of the 1980 Atascadero- General Plan text the section entitled "Professional Office. 3. Add as an insert to page 71 the section entitled "Profes- sional" as follows: "This land use designation provides for the following general categories of uses: a. Offices; professional, business, medical, financial and • utility 6 General Plan Amendment GP 811019:2 b. Studiosgalleries and cultural or fine arts institutions C. Personal services (not supported by retail sales of goods) d. Multiple family dwellings may also be permitted (if dev- eloped in a compatible manner) These categories of uses should be encouraged along arterials or major collectors where high traffic volumes can be accom- modated and in areas where a compatible transition is desired adjacent to single family areas. Access through residential areas shall be discouraged and properties without access to arterials or major collectors shall be limited to multiple family dwellings. 4. Make the changes to the 1980 General Plan Map as shown on the attached Exhibit Map entitled "Recommended Land Use Changes to the Morro Road Study Area. " ACTION The Planning Commission should direct Staff as deemed appropriate. • REPORT PREPARED BY: MARY E. B TIE Associate Planner REPORT APPROVED BY: AW ENCE STEVENS Planning Director /Ps i t 7 L , r • � r � i, =.,, r � ray. � � "i r 4v � �I • a i `._ ��. Vi�O • • � r n 1 a � � \C•�j �} v` ` N'i� �r 1 � I i i d. .� I vNI. 1 j.V \ t ,K ryj;::y+y� -'i I:: :�:1. �C`.•ii�W�i� ..1. > ' � S ' .:a .• ,:,;1� . .:ti`s q��,,��"`�� f •���� �� � F �k.l'E �;t:i .� � \ `.�. "yea l/ f /t` Y ♦ I p ��4 STUD AREd 'i 1/� ... ..................... ................ .......... ..........: GE3',TERAL PLATT MAP LAND USE AND CIRCULATION H!3H CENS b.ULT FAN f h Y CCI E RC'PL �� AGR.CULTURE LCV/ C MS 'JILT. FAA Pt-Al-.' C MERCIAL RECREATIGG Y HIGH DENS SRG'_.FAR E� C M.' CIA PARK I SPECIAL RECREATION -S, RID !S.SNGL FAM. SFFCIAL CCMMCRCAL I LC'.'; G N5.INCL.FAY PR ESSIONAL OFFICE........................ r— y AAU 3A'l SNGL,FAM I`.JS-RIAL PARR .I FU_LI. ��/,/, INCJSTRIAL < LWE 5�cia! CemrrJercia./ �' Pref ess�cr�a/ �FiG� �'/zcdy A0. - as candct/0 13 � i 1 � INCORPORATED JUIT 2.t979 GENERAL FLAN All. ZCYCLE 1 1982 '::. . -:. . . MORRO ROAD STUDY Z '•':• RECOD-(MENDED LAND USE Z 2 ' ! �•••••• �3� ;` CHANGES TO THE MORRO 1 � .i`' •. �� \5 .4 ROAD STUDY AREA �a (detail Gommartial •.•. f t 9 •.•. . �_ f PA2 ProFe5Sional 1 z �••f • •• 2 is io '� •: : :: . '1 4 q (10 4 21 d •,•. . . r=.•.•.•.•.•. 2 ' l ,p ••• A lo . . I! 7A ii : . Z 9 tQ (0 t � f 5 — 3 `•- 5f t3.� _M_E_M O R_A_N D ,U_M_ TO: City Council FROM: City Manager SUBJECT: Booster' s Club Sign Over a year ago the Chamber of Commerce requested the re- moval of the sign used by the Boasters' Club in front of the Chamber Building. Pursuant to your instructonsI contacted the Boosters' Club and Chamber with the request that they agree upon use or disposal of the sign. Sometimeafter these. events, I was advised by the Chamber that the Boosters' Club had agreed that the ' sign- could be removed. I requested of the Chamber that this agreement be provided in writing. . Since, ,then, however, I have, not received any correspondence indicating such an agreement. In January of this year, the Chamber notified me that they still wished to have the sign removed, that they had been in touch with the Boosters' Club and had received no response from them during this past year. The request was again made that the sign be removed with the Chamber offering to do so at its expense. In mid-January, I ,wrote a letter to the Boosters' Club reviewing some of these problems and asking them to con- tact me with regard to this matter. I also informed them that if I had not received any information from them that I would proceed to Council with a recommendation that the sign be re- moved. That letter was dated January 15, 1982. I have still not heard from the Boosters' Club and, therefore, am recommend- ing to you that the sign be removed and that the City accept the Chamber' s offer to have itremovedat the Chamber's expense. The Chamber has also indicatedthatthe sign itself will be offered to the Boosters' Club should they wish to have it. *RAY WARDEN 3-2-82 ROBERT J.WILKINS.JR. MAYOR . CITY.ATTORNEY WILLIAM H.STOVER P. O. BOX 749 MAYOR PRO-TEMPORE ATASCADERO.CA 93423 .(HOS) 466-5678 GEORGE P. HIGHLAND MARJORIE B. MACKEY INCORPORATED JULY 2, 1979. - ROLFE NELSON _ POLICE DEPARTMENT (805) 466.8600 MURRAY L.WARDEN ADMINISTRATION BUILDING < CITY MANAGER/CLERK POST OFFICE BOX 747 p ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA 93423 - FIRE DEPARTMENT 6005 LEWIS AVENUE January 15, 1782 PHONE (805) 466.8000 ATASCAD RO,CA 93422 (805) 466.2141 Richard Johnson, President Atascadero Boosters' Club One High School Hill Atascadero, California 93422 Dear Mr. Johnson: Some time ago, the Chamber of Commerce and the Boosters' Club were in communication concerning the use and status of the Boosters' Club sign in front of the Chamber of Commerce building. It is my understanding that the sign is located on City property and that a lease was report- ed to have been given to the Boosters' Club for the use of the proper- ty; however, efforts to locate that lease have failed. Whether a lease exists or not, the question has arisen as to the con- tinued need for a sign at its present location. The Chamber has again requested its removal as they had done previously. A year ago, when the Council considered this matter, they expressed the opinion that the continued existence or use of that sign should be a matter of agreement between the Chamber and the Boosters' Club. It is my under- standing that no agreement has been forthcoming, although I have been told that the Boosters' Club had decided that they had no further need for the sign. If the latter is the case, I would request your ac- knowledging such to me so that the sign can be removed. If the Boost- ers wish to remain in possession of the sign, I am sure it could be turned over to you after its removal. Since this matter has been under consideration for over ayear , I would appreciate it if you would contact me at your earliest conven- ience so that the matter may be resolved once and for all. In the absence of any indication as to the Boosters' Club wishes, I shall, in the near future, take the matter to theCityCouncil with a recommen- dation that the sign be removed as soon as possible. I hope to hear from you soon. Sincerely, MU RAY WARDEN C ty Ma, ager • MLW:ad c: Robert M. Jones MORLAN and JONES THOMAS M.MORLAN Anurncys at Laic TELEPHONE ROBERT M.JONES 5850 WEST MALL .18051 466-4422 POST OFFICE BOY 606 ATASCADERO,CALIFORNIA 93423 January 12 , 1982 Murray Warden, City Manager u � �� City of Atascadero 1 $2 Post Office Box 747 Atascadero, CA 93423 Re: Booster Club Sign Dear Murray: On behalf of the Atascadero Chamber of Commerce, I am hereby requesting that the former Booster Club sign located in front of the Atascadero Chamber of Commerce office, situated on City property, be removed as soon as possible. In previous conversations with you, I informed you that I had notified the Booster Club of our intention to request the City to remove the sign and I have received no response from them. I assume that you are still of the opinion that the sign and the property belongs to the City of Atascadero and since it pres- ently has no use to the City, should be removed. If the City does not wish to bear the cost of removal, I am sure, we, the Chamber of Commerce, can handle this job. . The sign itself would be offered to the Booster Club if they wished to have it for placement at another location. I look forward to your response to this letter. Very truly yours , z i Robert M. Jones Attorney at Law RMJ:pas —M-E M_O—R_A—N D—U_M TO: City Manager! March 4 , 1982 FROM: Planning Direct r SUBJECT: Resolutions Adopting General Plan Amendments for Cycle 1 of 1982 The Government Code requires adoption of a resolution to amend the General Plan. City Council has previously con- ducted public hearing on these matters and the attached resolutions finalize the action taken at the hearing. • LAWRENCE STEVENS MQPAYL. WARDEN Planning Director City M ager /pi • . RESOLUTION NO. 9-82 A RESOLUTION OF THE ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL DENYING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT GP 811019: 3 CONCERNING MINIMUM LOT SIZE CRITERIA IN THE LOW DENSITY AND SUBURBAN SINGLE FAMILY RESI- DENTIAL LAND USE DESIGNATIONS WHEREAS, the Atascadero City Council conducted a public hearing on the subject matter; and, WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65323 provides that a general plan be amended by the adoption of a resolution; and, WHEREAS, criteria to evaluate minimum lot size in the Low Density and Suburban Single Family Residential land use designations are ade- quate within the 1980 Atascadero General Plan; and, • WHEREAS, existing ordinances and practices implementing the Gen- eral Plan criteria are adequate pending clarification in the future hearings on the new zoning ordinance and the subsequent rezoning pro- gram; and, WHEREAS , specific implementation of the minimum lot size criteria identified in the General Plan is best, accomplished by zoning techniques. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Atascadero City Council does hereby deny General Plan Amendment GP 811019: 3 concerning mini- mum lot size criteria in the Low Density and Suburban Single Family Residential land use designations. • RESOLUTION NO. 9-82 On motion by Councilman and seconded by Councilman l , the foregoing resolution is adopted in its entirety by. the following roll call voter AYES: NOES: ABSENT: DATE ADOPTED: ROBERT J. WILKINS, Mayor ATTEST: MURRAY L. WARDEN, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ALLEN GRIMES , City Attorney • 2 RESOLUTION NO. 10-82 A RESOLUTION OF THE ATASCADERO' CITY COUNCIL APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT GP 811019:1 AMENDING THE TEXT OF THE 'LAND USE ELEMENT TO ESTABLISH DIFFERENT DENSITY STANDARDS IN HIGH AND LOW DENSITY MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AREAS. WHEREAS,_ the Atascadero City Council conducted a public hearing on the subject matter; and, WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65323 provides that a general plan be amended ,by_ the adoption of a resolution; and, WHEREAS, approval of this amendment will not result in any signi- ficant adverse environmental effects as long as appropriate mitigation measures are introduced; and, WHEREAS, the proposed methods of determining permitted multi-fami- ly densities will eliminate confusion by providing a; Less complex formula; and, • WHEREAS, the density increased, and other modifications will tend to encourage more economically feasible multi-family projects; and, WHEREAS, it is more appropriate for the General Plan to set an upper limit on density in multi-family districts and allow the zoning ordinance to implement more specifically permitted densities based on area characteristics. ' NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Atascadero City Council does hereby approve General Plan Amendment GP 811019: 1 amending pages 60 and 61 of the.text of the Land Use Elementto establish different density standards in Multiple ,'Family Residential areas, to read as follows: "Multi-Family.. Residential The current distribution of multi-family residential lots is largely confined to, the four octants closest to the center of town. These four octants, NE-I , SE-I, NW-I , and SW-I , contain 91 percent of the improved multi-family lots. In keeping with the desired character :of thelow density residential community, dev- elopment of each mufti-residential area in the future needs to be considered in the light of such specific factors as the topo- graphy, the traffic circulation, drainage, fire protection and the general level of use intensity at that location. RESOLUTION NO. 10-82 The-Multi-Family residential areas shall have the following den- sity, and use characteristics. - A minimum lot size of one-half acre providing sewers are available. smaller lot sizes may be allowed in conjunction with planned residential developments, including planned mobile home developments and subdivisions, provided that the overall density within the-project -is consistent with other density standards contained herein. Structures shall be limited to two stories. - Other usescompatible with multi-family residential use: parks and playgrounds, accessory buildings and uses, con- valescent homes, and mobile home parks. Multi-Family Residential shall be further divided into; High Density Shall be permitted along arterials only and may include apartments of five or more dwelling units. The maximum - allowable density shall not exceed 16 dwelling units per acre although lesser den- sities may be specified by zoning based on site characteristics; except, a _ density bonus may be allowed under certain circum- stances, where adequate provisions are made to provide housing • ` units affordable to low and moderate income persons. Low Density Shall be permitted in areas not adjacent to arterials and may be permitted adjacent to-Single-Family Residential. May include du- plexes, triplexes and fourplexes,- but generally no more than five dwelling units per building. New projects with more than four units per structure shall require specific design approval. _ The maximum allowable density shall not exceed ten units per acre although lesser densities may be speci- fied, by zoning based on site characteristics; except, a density bonus may be allowed, under certain circumstances, where adequate provisions are made to provide housing units affordable to low and moderate income- persons." 2 RESOLUTION NO. 10-82 • On motion by Councilman and seconded by Councilman , the foregoing resolution is adopted in its entirety by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: DATE ADOPTED: ROBERT J. WILKIN, Mayor ATTEST: MURRAY L. WARDEN, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: • ALLEN GRIMES , City Attorney 3 • RESOLUTION NO 11-82 i A RESOLUTION OF THE ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT GP 810930:1 AMENDING THE TEXT OF THE LAND USE ELEMENT AND THE LAND USE MAP WITHIN THE -NORTH EL_CAMINO REAL COMMERCIAL STUDY AREA. WHEREAS, the Atascadero City Council conducted a public hearing on the subject matter; and, WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65323 provides that a general plan be amended by the adoption of a resolution; and, WHEREAS, approval of this amendment will not result in any signi- ficant adverse environmental impacts as long as appropriate mitigation measures are introduced; and, WHEREAS, the recommended General Plan text and map amendments en- courage a sound, long range guide for land development while providing for additional uses which have the potential to generate additional jobs; and, • WHEREAS, El Camino Real provides a reasonable boundary for the commercial land use designations and, WHEREAS, development opportunities are not significantly altered and economic potential is relatively unchanged. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Atascadero City Council does hereby approve General Plan Amendment GP 810930:1 amending the textof the Land Use element and the Land -Use- Map within the North El Camino Real Commercial Study Area, as follows 1. Delete ,from page 72 of the 1980 Atascadero General Plan the second paragraph under the headings "SERVICE COMMERCIAL" and "HEAVY COMMERCIAL and replace it with the following text entitled "COMMERCIAL- PARK" . "An area of Commercial Park is designated north of San An- selmo Road to just south of Del Rio Road and is bounded east and west by Highway 101 and El Camino Real respectively. The intent of this land use designation is to set aside an area for uses including but not limited to: a. Large lot commercial uses, generally on sites of two acres or more although smaller lot sizes may be allowed for planned unit developments, which shall include but not be ..limited to automobile sales agencies, 'mobile home sales facilities, shopping centers including at least one anchor tenant, department stores', and nurseries. RESOLUTION NO. 11-82 b. Light manufacturing and light industrial uses whish . meet performance criteria established by zoning, re- search and development companies, labor intensive pro- duction and manufacturing companies which are consid- ered "clean" environmentally (such as electronic assem- bly plants) , and which can provide acomprehensive and uniform development plan approach for smaller users. Generally, development criteria would be similar to that es- tablished for industrial parks as described on page 172 in the Community Appearance Element of this General Plan." 2. Make the changes to the 1980 Atascadero General Plan Map as shown on the attached exhibit, which is made a part here- of by reference, entitled "Recommended Land Use Changes to the North El Camino Real Commercial Study Area. " ,On motion by Councilman and seconded by Councilman the foregoing -resolution is adopted in its entirety by; the -following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: None ABSENT: "DATE ADOPTED: ROBERT J. WILKINS, Mayor ATTEST: MURRAY L. WARDEN, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM:' ALLEN GRIMES , City Attorney 2 RESOLUTION NO. 12-82 A RESOLUTION OF THE ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL APPROVING AMEND- MENTS TO THE TEXT OF THE LAND USE AND CIRCULATION ELEMENTS AND TO THE LAND USE MAP WITHIN THE EL CAMINO REAL TRANSI- TIONAL STUDY AREA, INCLUDING APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMEND- MENTS GP 811001:1 (RAUCH,) , GP180325: 2 (WALLEY) , AND GP 810903:1 (SALMERON) , AND DENIAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS GP 810930: 2 (LINDSEY) , ' GP 810922:1 (LALANDE) AND GP 810928:1 (HOHENSTEIN) WHEREAS, The Atascadero City Council conducted a public hearing on the subject matter; and, WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65323 provides that a general _plan be amended by the adoption of a resolution; and, WHEREAS, approval of this amendment will not result in any signi- ficant adverse environmental impacts as long as appropriate mitigation measures are introduced; and, WHEREAS, the recommended changes strive to implement logical and sound, long range planning goals for the City of Atascadero; and WHEREAS, certain policies contained in the 1980 Atascadero General Plan can be better implemented by the recommended Land Use and Circu- lation Element changes; and. I WHEREAS, development opportunities are not significantly altered and economic potential is relatively unchanged; and, WHEREAS, the proposed land use and circulationchangeswould cre- ate a logical transition of land uses; from more intense to less intense activities; moving eastward from the E1 Camino Real commercial area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Atascadero City Council does hereby approve amendments to the text of the Land Use and Circu- lation Elements and to the Land Use Map within the El Camino Real Transitional Study Area, including approval of General Plan Amend- ments GP811001: 1 (Rauch) , GP810325:2 (Walley) , and GP810903:1 (Salmeron) , and denial of General Plan AmendmentsGP 810930:2 (Lindsey) , GP810922:1 (LaLande) and GP810928:1 (Hohenstein) , as follows: 1. Changing the text of the Land Use Element on page 60 of the General Plan under the heading "High Density" to read: "Shall be permitted along arterials and may be permitted along collectors and local streets and may include.. . . . . . . " RESOLUTION NO. 12- 2. Inserting into the text of the Circulation element on Page • 124 under the heading of 114. Collectors a. Urban Collectors" the following: "vi. Santa Ysabel Avenue from Curbaril to Atascadero Creek, across the ; proposedbridgecrossing, and along Lewis AvenuefromAtascadero Creek to Traffic Way." 3. Make changes to the 1980 Atascadero General Plan Map as shown on the attached Exhibit Map 'entitled "Recommended Land Use and Circulation Changes to the E1 Camino Real Transi- tional Study Area." On motion by Councilman and seconded by Councilman , the foregoing resolution is adopted in its entirety by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: - DATE ADOPTED: • ROBERT J. WILKINS, Mayor ATTEST: MURRAY L. WARDEN, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM:` ALLEN GRIMES, City Attorney 2