Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda Packet 10/13/1986
NDY WILKINS DEPUTY CITY CLERK NOTE: THERE WILL BE A CLOSED COUNCIL SESSION AT 6 :30 P.M. , FOURTH FLOOR CLUB ROOM, FOR PURPOSES OF DISCUSSING PERSONNEL ISSUES A G E N D A ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting ATASCADERO ADMINISTRATION BUILDING Fourth Floor Rotunda Room OCTOBER 13, 1986 7.30 P.M. Call to Order Pledge of Allegiance Invocation Roll Call City Council Comments ** Proclamation - Drug and Alcohol Abuse Prevention in Community Schools ** Proclamation - Proclaiming September , October, November, and December as "Good Neighbor" Months ` COMMUNITY FORUM - (Only 15 minutes will be allowed for Community Forum at the beginning of the agenda. Citizens are requested to keep remarks under 5 minutes, and that a speaker person speak in behalf of groups. ) A. CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under Item A, Consent Calendar, are considered to be routine, and will be enacted by one motion in the form listed below. There will be no separate discussion of these items. If discussion is required, that item will be removed from the Consent Calendar and considered separately. Vote may be by roll call. 1. Approval of Minutes of Regular Council Meeting of September 22, 1986 2. Proposed Resolution 108-86 - Adoption of Salary/Classification Schedule for City Management Employees 3. Proposed Resolution 112-86 - Amendment to Resolution 21-85 - City Manager Terms and Conditions of Employment 4. Authorization to Declare 1979 Dodge Dial-A-Ride Bus as Surplus Equipment 1 5. Approval of Proposed Resolution 111-86 - Accepting an Irrevocable Offer of Dedication of an Easement for Road Purposes on 2 Parcels Adjacent to Proposed Sycamore Bridge by the Atascadero Mutual Water Company 6. Acceptance of Bid number 86-42 - Purchase of New Transit Bus to Wide One Corporation 7. Acceptance of Bid Number 86-41 - 1986/87 Street Overlay Project to Madonna Construction Company 8. Approval of Proposed Resolution 113-86 - Establishment of Stop Sign on ,Balboa Avenue at San Fernando 9. Approval of Lot Line Adjustment 5-86 - 4685 Lobos- Watkins/ Twin Cities Engineering 10. Approval of Lot Line Adjustment 6-86 - 10755/10855 Atascadero Road - Garcia/Cuesta Engineering 11. Approval of Tentative Parcel Map 13-86 - 7300 San Gregorio Road - Subdivision of 12.12 Acres into 4 Lots of 2.85, 3.10, 3.10, and 3.10 Acres Each & Establish Private Street Name of Ropa Court - Langille/Dan Stewart & Associates 12. Approval of Tentrative Parcel Map 22-86 - 5120 and 5300 San Benito - Subdivision of 10 .26 Acres into 4 Lots of 2.74, 2. 52, 2.50 , and 2.50 Acres Each - St Clair/Cook/Bland/Volbrecht Surveys 13. Approval of Tentative Parcel Map 23-86 - 5100 San Benito - Subdivision of 5 Acres into 2 Lots of 2.50 Acres Each - St Clair/Cook/Bland/Volbrecht Surveys 14. Approval of Tentative Parcel Map 25-86 - 8375 Portola Road - Lot Line Adjustment and Subdivision of 2 Acre Parcel into 2 Lots of 1 Acre Each - Wright/North Coast Engineering 15. Approval of Tentative Parcel Map 15-84 - 1875 El Camino Real - Extension of Time to Complete Conditions of Tentative Map - HLS Properties/Associated Professions 16. Approval of Tentative Parcel Map AT 830325: 1 - Lots 14, 15, 16 17, & 33 of Block 24 - Balboa and Ardilla Roads - Time Extension to Complete Condtions of Tentative Map - Dovica/ Central Coast Engineering 17. Acceptance of Final Parcel Map 33-85 - 7355 Sombrilla/7350 Encinal Parsons/Cuesta Engineering • 18. Acceptance of Final Parcel Map 10-86 - 10885 San Marcos Road - Hale/Cuesta Engineering 2 i • 19. Acceptance of Final Lot Line Adjustment 12-85 — 9250 Santa Lucia - Hawkins/Cuesta Engineering 20. Acceptance of Final Parcel Map 31-85 - 10800 Santa Ana Road - Davis/Twin Cities Engineering 21. Acceptance of Final Parcel Map 25-85 -11160 Atascadero Road - Curtis/Twin Cities Engineering 22. Acceptance of Final Parcel Map 9-85 - 11955 San Marcos Road - Davis/Twin Cities Engineering 23. Approval of Consultant Contract with David W. Griffiths for SB 90 Services B. HEARINGS, APPEARANCES, AND REPORTS 1. Presentation by Architectural Standards Review Committee 2. Proposed Ordinance 139 - Amending the Plumbing Code to Allow Sewage Disposal Systems on Slopes of 30% or More (FIRST READING) C. - NEW BUSINESS 1. Proposed Resolution 115-86 - Opposition to Measure "A" - Permit Processing for Onshore Oil Processing Facilities D. ATASCADERO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT (ACSD) (Council will recess and convene as the Atascadero County Sanitation District Board of Directors) 1. Developer Request for Special Consideration of Sewer Fees Bethel-Messer/Nelson (Cont'd from 9/8/86) (The Board of Directors will adjourn and reconvene as the City Council) E. COMMUNITY FORUM F. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION 1. City Council 2. City Attorney 3. City Clerk 4. City Treasurer 5. City Manager 3 0 • P R O C L A M A T I O N DRUG AND ALCOHOL ABUSE PREVENTION IN COMMUNITY SCHOOLS WHEREAS, research studies show the use of drugs and alcohol by school aged childred is epidemic in our schools and com- munities; and WHEREAS, the effects of drugs and alcohol abuse are devastating to young people' s lives and their futures, to their families, to society, and to the education environment; and WHEREAS, schools are an appropriate place to educate youth about the harmful effects of drug and alcohol abuse and to assist them in learning positive ways to make healthy choices in their lives; and WHEREAS, the schools cannot be expected to shoulder this burden alone because the future of the entire community, indeed our democracy, depends upon having an educated citizenry able to make etical and moral choices; and • WHEREAS, schools should provide a safe haven for students so that our youth can be safe, and learn effectively. THEREFORE, be it resolved that the City Council applauds the determination of school districts to make drug and alcohol abuse prevention a high priority for the 1986-87 school year and beyond, and hereby endorses and encourages the Police Department to work with our community' s schools to develop a plan of action that will make school campuses safe from drugs and alcohol abuse. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Atascadero City Council lends its support to help foster the cooperative relationships among teachers, parents, students, law enforcement and other community agencies necessary to accomplish this goal. CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA MARJORIE MACKEY Mayor • October 13 , 1986 • PLEASE NOTE: THE "GOOD NEIGHBOR" PROCLAMATION WILL BE PROVIDED AT A LATER TIME BY THE CITY MANAGER' S' OFFICE. • • 'L. • •MEETING AGENDA DATE 10/13/851TEM#- A • ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES September 22, 1986 Atascadero Administration Building The regular meeting of the Atascadero City Council was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Mayor Mackey, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL Present: Councilmembers' Borgeson, Handshy, Molina, Norris and Mayor Mackey Absent: None STAFF Mike Shelton, City Manager; Robert Jones, City Attorney; Boyd Sharitz, City Clerk; Steve DeCamp, Senior Planner; Paul Sensibaugh, Public Works Director ; Cindy Wilkins, Deputy City Clerk. COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS Mayor Mackey expressed thanks to all those who sent cards, flowers and gave support in response to the recent passing away of her husband, John C. Mackey. Mayor Mackey congratulated the City of Morro Bay for their Harbor Days Celebration, October 4-5, 1986, and encourages Atascadero citizens to attend the festivities there. Mayor Mackey issued a proclamation in view of National Fire Prevention Week, October 5-11, 1986. Mayor Mackey announced that Council met in closed session prior to tonight' s meeting for the purpose of discussing labor negotiations; discussion was not completed, and Council will adjourn the regular meeting (at the end of the scheduled agenda) to continue the closed session discussion. COMMUNITY FORUM Joe Knyal, resident on Alta Vista, read a prepared statement relating to 3: 2 decisions by the City Council. Doug Nix, 4533 Yerba, expressed concern about persons shooting in the riverbed, inside City limits and where children often play, feeling that it appears to be condoned by the Atascadero Police Dept. ; he • urges enforcement of the ordinance which prohibits discharging of firearms within City limits. Mayor Mackey responded that his concern will be brought to the attention of APD Chief McHale. 1 �� A. CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Approval of Minutes of Regular Council Meeting of August 25, 1986 (Cont'd) 2. Approval of Minutes of Regular Council Meeting of September 8 , 1986 3. Approval of Finance Director ' s Monthly Report - August, 1986 4. Approval of Treasurer 's Monthly Report - August, 1986 5. Authorization for Hospice to Utilize City Tree for Fund-Raising Event 6. Proposed Resolution 106-86 - Approving Memorandum of Under- standing between City of Atascadero and the Fire Captains Bargaining Unit 7. Proposed Resolution 105-86 Approving Memorandum, of Under- standing between City of Atascadero and the Atascadero Fire Fighters Bargaining Unit 8. Proposed Resolution 107-86 Approving Memorandum of Under- standing between City of Atascadero and the Atascadero Sergeants Service Organization 9. Recognition of August Employee of the Month - Debbie Terra - Administrative Services Department 10. Authorization to Engage Consultant George Sipel and Associates to Provide Management Consultation 11. Approval of General Plan Conformity Report - County & City Property Transfers 12. Proposed Resolution 109-86 - Approval of Returned Check Policy 13. Approval of Tentative Tract Map 20-86 - 8305 Coromar Road - Subdivision of 3.50 Acre Parcel into 6 Lots of between . 50 and .71 Acres Each - Molina/Twin Cities Engineering (Cont'd from 9/8/86) 14. Acceptance of Final Parcel Map 18-85 - 10655 San Marcos/10670 Realito - Miller/Associated Professions 15. Acceptance of Final Parcel Map 30-84 - 9755 San Marcos Road - Idler/Ellery Biathrow 16. Acceptance of Final Parcel Map 11-86 - 8555/8575 Amapoa - Stinchfield & Summers/North Coast Engineering 17. Approval of Proposed Resolution 110-86 - 1987 Historical Pres- ervation Grant Application for City Administration Building Funded by the State Department of Parks and Recreation 2 IA Councilwoman Mackey announced that Item A-8 is pulled from the Conse Agenda as the labor negotiations are not yet settled; item is table until next regular meeting. Councilman Molina requested A-13 , Councilwoman Borgeson requested A-10, and Mayor Mackey requested A-5 be pulled for separate discus- sion. Mayor Mackey pulled A-11 for a comment. MOTION: By Councilwoman Norris to approve Items A-1 through A-17, minus Items 5, 8, 10, 11 and 13, seconded by Councilman Molina; passed unanimously by roll-call. Mayor Mackey expressed her support regarding Item A-5 and favors the City paying for the electricity to light the tree; Council concurred to utilize contingency funds to pay for the necessary electricity. MOTION: By Councilwoman Norris to approve A-5 , seconded by Councilman Handshy; passed unanimously. Councilwoman Borgeson spoke in opposition to A-10, suggesting that, instead, Council utilize the League of California Cities conferences in hopes to reduce the cost for management consultant services, not- ing an upcoming seminar at Lake Tahoe, Nov. 19-21, 1986. MOTION: By Councilwoman Borgeson that Council reject the proposal of George Sipel and Associates, seconded by Councilwoman Norri passed unanimously. 0 Mayor Mackey, regarding Item #11, commented that she has some misgiv- ings about the site proposed for a future City police facility, due to the hillside location and the possible need to remove a large oak tree. Councilwoman Borgeson inquired of the possibility of Council requesting the County to install sidewalk along two of the properties listed in the staff report; Steve DeCamp, Senior Planner, responded, noting that the Planning Commission did note the absence of sidewalk on the two parcels and supports such a request. MOTION: By Councilman Handshy to approve Item #11, seconded by Coun- cilman Molina; passed unanimously. Councilman Molina, due to conflict of interest, stepped down from vote on Item A-13. Councilwoman Borgeson expressed concern regarding the number of oaks to be affected/removed due to the rear easement on the parcel (Item A-13) . MOTION: By Councilman Handshy to adopt Tentative Tract Map 20-86 (Item A-13) , seconded by Councilwoman Norris; passed 4:0, with Councilman Molina not voting. 3 0 0 B. HEARINGS, APPEARANCES AND REPORTS 1. Presentation Requesting City of Atascadero' s Support of San Luis Obispo County Visitors and Conference Bureau (VCB) Mike Shelton gave staff report and introduced Jonni S. Eylar, Director of SLO County VCB, and Dave Garth, SLO Chamber Director, who made an informational presentation on this item. They noted that County-wide support is crucial for a successful program and discussed promotion of both group business as well as tourism, especially in the off-season, and how advertising will be accomplished. Both responded to questions from Council. Tom Hatchell, representing the Atascadero Chamber of Commerce, con- firmed the Chamber Board of Directors' vote in support of the proposed concept of a VCB following a presentation on August 14th by Ms. Eylar. MOTION: By Councilwoman Borgeson that Council authorize contribution of $1,000 to the SLO County VCB (as outlined in staff re- port) , seconded by Councilwoman Norris; passed by 4 :1 roll- call, with Councilman Molina voting NO. C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Request for Proposal and Advertisement for City Attorney Contract (Cont'd from 9/8/86) Mike Shelton, City Manager, gave staff report followed by Council dis- cussion. MOTION: By Councilwoman Borgeson to advertise the availability of the City Attorney position only within the League of California Cities Tri-County Municipal Attorney Assn. membership; motion died for lack of a second. MOTION: By Mayor Mackey that Council direct the City Manager to advertise availability of Request for Proposal document for City Attorney services in accordance with advertising and selection methodology outlined in the memorandum (from City Manager , dated 9/22/86) , seconded by Councilwoman Norris; passed 3: 2, with Councilmembers Handshy and Molina voicing NO. 2. Proposed Resolution 104-86 - Approval of the County of San Luis Obispo Solid Waste Management Plan (Cont'd from 9/8/86) Paul Sensibaugh, Public Works Director , gave staff report. MOTION: By Councilman Molina to adopt the SLOCSWMP (Res. No. 104-86) • subject to the letter of intent discussed herein and attached hereto (in agenda packet staff report) , conditioned upon the City Council being approached by the County prior to any implementation of the plan which may directly or indirectly 4 0 have an impact on the citizens of Atascadero, financially otherwise, and conditional upon a member of the City Counc 0 or their alternate being represented on the proposed Solid Waste Commission; motion seconded by Councilman Handshy, passed 4 :1, with Councilwoman Norris voicing NO. D. COMMUNITY FORUM Richard Shannon, 4820 Obispo, responded to Councilwoman Borgeson' s concerns about possible tree removals (re: Item A-13) , noting that the road was specifically located to the right of the property to avoid any oak tree removals, although the City doesn' t have a policy to require that location of roads be such as to avoid tree removals. Councilwoman Borgeson responded that she intends to lobby for an ordi- nance to protect native oaks. Joe Grisanti, resident, expressed strong opposition to strict, in- sensible controls on removal of trees, feeling they are sometimes logically necessary. E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION City Council - Councilman Molina introduced a resolution expressing opposition to Measure A for consideration of adoption by Counci Council consented to place the resolution on their next agenda. City Clerk - Boyd Sharitz announced the new location of the City Clerk' s Office in Room 103 ; also, he announced that 3:00 p.m. tomor- row is the deadline for filing of the boundary map for proposed Sewer Improvement District No. 4 (Separado/Cayucos) . MEETING ADJOURNED AT 8: 56 P.M. TO A CLOSED SESSION FOR THE PURPOSE OF DISCUSSION OF LABOR NEGOTIATIONS. MINUTES RECORDED BY: BOYD C. SHARITZ, �y Clerk PREPARED BY: CINDY WILKINS, Deputy City Clerk 5 IN?O/13/86 AGENDA # A 2 RESOLUTION 108 -86 -Af RESOLUTION OF THE ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL ADOPTING A SALARY/CLASSIFICATION SCHEDULE FOR CITY MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES Section 1. A Salary/Classification Schedule, attached as Exhibits I and II, for City Management Employees is hereby adopted. Section 2. For management employees, i.e. , City department heads, effective July 5, 1986 through June 30, 1987, the following provisions regarding benefits shall apply: a. The City shall continue to pay the employee monthly contribution (7% of gross) to the Public Employees' Retirement System (PERS) . b. The City shall pay all medical and dental benefit premiums for the employee and his/her eligible dependents at the rate and coverage prevailing under the City' s medical and dental program. c. For those employees without dependents or who choose not to enroll their dependents in the City plan, the amount of the dependent premium shall be paid to the employee as an addition to his/her regular pay. d. The,City shall maintain a term life insurance policy for each employee in a total amount of Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50 ,000.00) and the City shall pay the full premium amount for such coverage. e. The City shall maintain a term life insurance policy for each eligible dependent of the employee in a total amount of One Thousand Dollars ($1,000 .00) per dependent and shall pay all premiums for such dependents during Fiscal Year 1986-87. f. The City shall grant five (5) days administrative leave during Fiscal Year 1986-87 , such leave to be taken at the convenience of the City and subject to the approval of the City Manager. Time not used, shall be forfeited. g. The City shall pay a monthly vehicle allowance of $175.00 to the Director of Community Development, to the Director of Parks and Recreation, and to the Director of Administrative Services, and $200.00 to the Director of Public Works. On motion by Councilman and seconded by Councilman , the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ADOPTED: CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA By: MARJORIE R. MACKEY, Mayor ATTEST: BOYD C. SHARTIZ, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: MICHAEL SHELTON, City Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: ROBERT M. JONES, City Attorney �l Exhibit I Effective 07/05/86 CITY OF ATASCADERO SALARY/CLASSIFICATION SCHEDULE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES CLASSIFICATION MONTHLY SALARY Director of Parks and Recreation $2,844.44 Director of Administrative Services $3,074.34 Director of Community Development $3,476.31 Police Chief $3,549. 07 Fire Chief $3,615.93 Director of Public Works/City Engineer $3,953. 44 Effective 01/03/87 Exhibit II CITY OF ATASCADERO SALARY/CLASSIFICATION SCHEDULE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES CLASSIFICATION MONTHLY SALARY Director of Parks and Recreation $2,901.33 Director of Administrative Services $3,135.83 Director of Community Development $3,545.84 Police Chief $3,549.07 Fire Chief $3,688 .25 Director of Public Works/City Engineer $4,072.04 10/13/86: RESOLUTION NUMBER 112-86 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO AMENDING RESOLUTION 21-85 CITY MANAGER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT WHEREAS, on March 18, 1985, Michael B. Shelton, City Manager, entered into an employment agreement with the City of Atascadero; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to amend the terms and conditions of this agreement; THEREFORE, be it resolved that: Section 1 - Term of Employment - Section 1 is amended providing the terms of this agreement to begin on October 1, 1986 , and continue for 3 years, ending September 30, 1989, subject to conditions and terms set forth. At least ninety (90) days prior to the expiration of the term of this agreement, the City Council hereby agrees to notify Michael B. Shelton, in writing, of it' s intent to renew or not to renew agreement relationship, as prescribed. Section 4 - -Compensation of Employee Section 4 is amended providing a monthly salary of $4 ,630 , effective July 7 1986 , and $4, 770 effective January 3, 1987. Section 20 - Evaluation - Section 20 is added providing that the City Council shall devote a portion of at least one Council Meeting annually for discussion and evaluation of the perform- ance and working relationship between the City Manager and the City Council. This evaluation shall be based on the duties of the City Manager, as described in Section 2 and mutually agreed upon City goals and objectives. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that modifications included in previous amendments to the employment agreement not superseded are continued. On motion by Council Person and seconded by , the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: 1�' ADOPTED: ATTEST: CITY OF ATASCADERO BOYD C. SHARITZ MARJORIE MACKEY City Clerk Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: ROBERT M. JONES Interim City Attorney APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: & MICHAEL B. HELTON City Manager • M � �iG�pA • D� _��,Qf,3(�IIEM� MEMORANDUM TO: City Council THROUGH: Mike Shelton, City Manager FROM: Paul Sensibaugh, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Surplus City Property DATE: October 7, 1986 Recommendation: Staff requests that City Council declare the 1979 Dodge Dial-A-Ride bus as surplus equipment. Background: This bus was one of the original buses obtained by the County for the Dial-A-Ride transportation system. Ownership was transferred to the City upon incorporation. . This bus has been out of service for some time and with the purchase of a new bus this year it is certain that it will not be needed. In order for us to dispose of the bus Council will need to officially declare it surplus equipment. Advertisement will be made soliciting sealed bids. Fiscal Impact: It is estimated that the high bid will be in the neighborhood of $2, 000. • 1- • ` SING AGENDA 10/1 3/r96 ffEM f A - 5 • MEMORANDUM TO: City Council THROUGH: Mike Shelton, City Manager _ FROM: Paul Sensibaugh, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Roadway Easement from the Atascadero Mutual Water Company to the City of Atascadero DATE: October 8, 1986 Recommendation: Staff recommends that Council ratify Resolution 111-86 accepting an irrevocable offer of dedication of an easement for road- way purposes from the Atascadero Mutual Water Company. Background: The attached easement offer was necessary for the alignment adjustment of the Sycamore Road Bridge. Without the easement the . bridge would not have a geometrically correct alignment. Staff worked feverishly to meet an October 1 deadline to have this resolution signed. Caltrans had threatened the loss of bridge funds if the right-of-way was not acquired or offered. Council previously certified this right of way after receiving the gift offer from the Atascadero Mutual Water Company. The federal requirements for the funds, however , did not allow the gift without an appraisal of the take and a subsequent offer. Staff has been at the mercy of an appraiser ' s scheduling since late August. After several meetings and discussions the ap- praisal was in our hands on September 30 . It was necessary to obtain the Mayor ' s signature on the resolution to satisfy the federal re- quirements. Mayor Mackey signed this resolution based on the premis that it would be ratified by council at the next regular meeting following said signing. The City has now been assured verbally that all requirements have been met to receive the funds anticipated at the budget hearings for the Sycamore Bridge Project and that other bridge monies may be avail- able to us in the near future. Such funds are normally available to • the replacement of existing bridges. 1� 7 r RESOLUTION NO. 111-86 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ATASCADERO ACCEPTING AN IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF DEDICATION OF AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD PURPOSES WHEREAS, the ATASCADERO MUTUAL WATER COMPANY has granted to the City of Atascadero an Irrevocable Offer to Dedicate an Easement for road purposes , including the installation, maintenance, repair, replacement, enlargement and removal of the Sycamore Bridge and appurtenances , on adjoining land to the Sycamore Bridge; and WHEREAS , the parcels offered for Easement are necessary for the construction and enlargement of the Sycamore Bridge Crossing; and WHEREAS , in the interest of the public health, safety and welfare that the City of Atascadero accept the Offer of Dedication of land by the ATASCADERO MUTUAL WATER COMPANY: 0 NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Atascadero does resolve as follows : 1. The Irrevocable Offer of Dedication to the City of Atascadero by the ATASCADERO MUTUAL WATER COMPANY of an Easement for road purposes , and to install , maintain, repair, replace, enlarge and remove a public bridge and appurtenances on that certain real property in the City of Atascadero, County of San Luis Obispo, State of California described as Parcels 1 and 2 in Exhibit A, attached herewith, is hereby accepted. 2. Pursuant to the acceptance of that real property, the City of Atascadero hereby agrees to defend, indemnify and save harmless the Atascadero Mutual Water Company, its officers , agents and employees from any and all claims , demands , damages , costs , expenses , or liability 0 occasioned by this Offer of Dedication, and the acceptance thereof , and the provisions hereof , for in any way arising out of this Offer of -1- � Dedication, including, but not limited to , inverse condemnation, equitable relief, or any wrongful act or any negligent act or omission to act on tho part of the City, its agents , employees or independant contractors directly responsible for the City of Atascadero; provided further the foregoing shall apply to any wrongful acts , or any actively or passively negligent acts or omissions to act, committed jointly or concurrently by the City of Atascadero , its agents , employees or independant contractors . This Resolution is passed this day of , 1986. CITY OF ATASCADERO n _ BY: MARJOR# MACKEY, Mayor ATTEST: BOYD C. SHARITZ , City Clerk CINDY WILKINS , Deputy Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CONTENT : j U ROBERT M. NES , City Attorney -2- t' EXHIBIT A PARCEL I That portion of Lot 11D of Pine Mountain Park of Amendment "H" to the Map of Atascadero in the County of San Luis Obispo, State of California, as shown on the Map recorded in Book 4 of Maps at Sheet 81A in the office of the County Recorder of said County, described as follows : Commencing at the northerly corner of said lot 11D; thence along the northwesterly line of said Lot South 53° 47 ' 40" West 170 . 74 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence North 53° 47' 40" West 85. 00 feet; thence South 33° 59' 40" East 158. 16 feet to a point on the easterly line of said Lot; thence along said line, South 31° 26 ' East 75. 0 feet; thence South 30 56" West 165 . 78 feet to the southerly corner of said Lot; thence North 18° 57 ' West 328.08 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 0..55 acres more or less . PARCEL 2 That portion of Lot 12 of Block F of Amendment "L" to the Map of Atascadero in said County and State, as shown on the Map recorded in Book 4 of Maps at Sheet 8B in the office of the County Recorder of said County, described as follows : Beginning at the northeast corner of the land described in Parcel 1; said point being on the line common to said lots 11D and 12; thence along an existing fence South 5° 30 ' East 143 .18 feet to a point on the northerly line of the land described in the Deed recorded February 28 , 1931 in Book 102 of Official Records at page 404; thence nothwesterly along said northerly line along a curve concave to the notheast having a radius of 125 feet; a •radial bearing of North 60- 37 ' 03" East and a central angle of 32- 24 ' 42" an arc distance of 70 . 71 feet; thence North 3' 02' East 32.15 feet; thence -1- North 31`^ 27' West 24 . 43 feet to the intersection of the westerly line of said Lot 12; thence North 31° 26 ' East 25 . 35 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 0. 03 acres more or less. -2- RECORDING REQUESTED BY: CITY OF ATASCADERO OD WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CITY OF ATASCADERO P. 0. Box 747 ATASCADERO, CA 93423 IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF DEDICATION ATASCADERO PIUTUAL WATER COMPANY, the undersigned, being the present Title Owner of Record of the herein described parcels of land, do hereby make an Irrevocable Offer of Dedication to the CITY OF ATASCADERO,-' an Easement for road purposes and to install, maintain, repair, replace , enlarge and remove a public bridge and appurtenances on that certain real ,property described as Parcel 1 and Parcel 2, in Exhibit A attached hereto. It is understood and agreed that the CITY OF ATASCADERO, and its successors or assigns shall incur no liability with respect to such Offer of Dedication and shall not assume any responsibility for the offered parcel of land or any improvements thereon or therein, until such offer has been accepted by appropriate action of the City Council, or the local governing body or its successor or assign. In the event that the CITY OF ATASCADERO accepts this Offer of Dedication , the City agrees to indemnify and hold harmless , the ATASCADERO MUTUAL WATER COMPANY, its officers , agents and employees from any and all claims , demands , damages , costs , expenses or liability occassioned by the use of the afore- described Easement, including, but not limited to , inverse condemnation, equitable relief, or any wrongful act or any negligent act or omission to act on the part of the City, its agents , employees or independant contractors directly responsible to the CITY OF ATASCADERO. -1- The provisions hereof shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the heirs , successors , assigns, personal representatives of the respective parties hereto. ATASWERO M: UAL WATER COMPANY !J DATED: 9/30/86 BY: GORDON T. DAVIS , Chairman SECRETARY O STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) CC , COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO ) 3, 6, 1387 On this 30 day of SEPTEMBER 1986 , before me a Notary Public, persona- y appeared • A. ANFORD and PHOEBE L. MARTIN personally known to me or proved to me on the of satisfactory evidence to be the person who executed the within instrument as President and Secretary of the Corporation therein named and acknowledged to me that the Corporation executed it. G4�o _4 1 i NOTARY PUBLIC -2- ' • EXHIBIT • A iPARCEL I That portion of Lot 11D of Pine Mountain Park of Amendment "H" to the Map of Atascadero in the County of San Luis Obispo, State of California, as shown on the Map recorded in Book 4 of Maps at Sheet 81A in the office of the County Recorder of said County, described as follows : Commencing at the northerly corner of said lot 11D; thence along the northwesterly line of said Lot South 53° 47` 40" West 170 .74 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence North 53° 47 ' 40" West 85 . 00 feet; thence South 33° 59' 40" East 158. 16 feet to a point on the easterly line of said Lot; thence along said line, South 31° 26 ' East 75 . 0 feet; thence South 3° 56" West 165 . 78 feet to the southerly corner of said Lot; thence North 18° 57 ' West 328. 08 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 0 .55 acres more or less. PARCEL 2 That portion of Lot 12 of Block F of Amendment "L" to the Map of Atascadero in said County and State, as shown on the Map recorded in Book 4 of Maps at Sheet 8B in the office of the County Recorder of said County, described as follows : Beginning at the northeast corner of the land described in Parcel 1 ; said point being on the line common to said lots 11D and 12; thence along an existing fence South 5° 30 ' East 143 .18 feet to a point on the northerly line of the land described in the Deed recorded February 28 , 1931 in Book 102 of Official Records at page 404 ; thence nothwesterly along said northerly line along a curve concave to the notheast having a radius of 125 feet; a .radial bearing of North 60- 37 ' 03" East and a central angle of 32- 24 ' 42" an arc distance of 70 . 71 feet; thence North 3- 02' East 32. 15 feet; thence -1- North 311 27' West 24 . 43 feet to the intersection of the westerly line of said Lot 12; thence North 31° 26 ' East 25 . 35 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 0. 03 acres more or less . -2- VIP, Ce t p "'r..• V - I 1 , lk IA 1AA E ,.. - • ING AGENDA 10/13/86,M# AA 6_ MEMORANDUM TO: City Council THROUGH: Mike Shelton, City Manager FROM: Paul Sensibaugh, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Bid No. 86-42 - Dial-A-Ride bus DATE: October 7, 1986 Recommendation Staff recommends awarding the bid for the new transit bus to the sole bidder, Wide One Corporation, 3051 East La Palma Avenue, Anaheim, CA 92806. Background: At the Council meeting of September 8th, Council authorized staff to advertise for bids for a new transit bus. • Discussion: The Notice to Bidders was published and copies sent to various vendors. The sole bid received from Wide One Corporation was in the amount of $38,984 .14 with delivery in 120 days or less. The Engineer ' s Estimate was $40,000 . Fiscal Impact: The funds for this purchase were received in part by a grant from the State of California. The City share is expected to be approximately $8,000 . Attachment: Bids • 2 �� c o S ow Z •0 M-.. r F \i CD Q co O Q Oz N (a G d CD n�D o N _ n rt c� wv 0 w N O ry C d Q Z7 m N M Z rt "S C) CD P O Q -S CD (7 rt C) C-D D O q R , Q CD C <• In -�+ p (D ITIN iN " < BID FORM The undersigned bids as follows: One Paratransit Bus, current year model, $ 32,429.00 asP er specifications P 945.74 Sales Tax $ 1,945.74 One Wheelchair lift installation with tie—downs $ 4,885.00 (Not subject to sales tax) Total Bid F.O.B Atascadero $ 39,259.74 OPTION: Smooth front: Deduct $275.60 (See Vehicle Description Summary) To the City Purchasing Officer : In compliance with the above invitation for bids, and subject to all the conditions thereof, the undersigned offers , and agrees, if this bid be accepted within days from the date of the opening, to furnish any or all of the items upon which prices are quoted, at the price set opposite each item, delivered at the point as specified and, unless otherwise specified within days after receipt of • order . 10 Discount of 1 % will be allowed for payment within days from date of delivery. IMPORTANT INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDER: Bids must be sealed and addressed to: City of Atascadero Attn: City Clerk P.O. Box 747 Atascadero, CA 93423 Mark envelope "Bid 84-18" BIDDER: WIDE ONE CORPORATION by: TITLE: President ADDRESS : 3051 E. LaPalma Ave. , Anaheim Ca. 92806 DATE: October 2, 1986 10 UNITED BUS C O R P O RAT I O N 6700 S.GARFIELD AVE.,P.O.BOX 2187,BELL GARDENS,CA 9021 (213)773-6161 927-13 October 1, 1986 CITY OF ATASCADERO Purchasing Officer P.O. Box 747 Atascadero, CA 93423 RE: Request for Quotation Dear Sirs: Thank you for giving us the opportunity to bid on your transportation requirements. We will, however, be unable to submit a bid at this time, and therefore, must submit a "No Bid". We would, however, like to remain on your bidder's list for future bus requirements. Sincerely, UNITED BUS CORPORATION 7 D. Palfreyman Sales Executive DP/j la MNG AGENDA DA i 0/1 URBItE q 7 MEMORANDUM TO: City Council THROUGH: Mike Shelton, City Manager FROM: Paul Sensibaugh, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Bid No. 86-41 - 1986/87 Overlay Project DATE: October 7, 1986 Recommendation: Staff recommend that Council award the subject bid to the low bidder, Madonna Construction, P.O. Box 3910, San Luis Obispo, CA 93403. Background: At the Council meeting of September 8th Council authorized staff to prepare plans and specifications and advertise for bids for this project. Discussion: The bids received were as follows: Madonna Construction $388,366 . 46 M.J. Hermrick 395 ,605.00 R. Burke Corp. 433,738.00 C. Sanchez & Sons NO BID Engineer ' s Estimate $400, 000. 00 Fiscal Impact: Funds are budgeted in the F.Y. 1986/87 budget for this project. Attachment: • Bids Oo > o Q a) 4 a , • �° _ _ `� c1 Nt CD U L 4 C ® ~ :z LL, w .w. 4-J < �' J i qu u --p o i 66 0 QZy Qj U ti -a Q b F o s o a� iao (L A STREET OVERLAY PROJECT 1986/87 CITY OF ATASCADERO BID NO. 86-41 ITE�1 DESCRIPTION EST. QTY. UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE 1 2" (.17') Asphaltic Concrete Type 13,140 tons "B" Overlay on existing asphaltic concrete 2 Asphaltic Emulsion Tack Coat, 50 tons , 3 SS-1H @ 0.10 gal/sq.yd. t 3 Adjustments of Sewer Manhole 87 each 7,0 dF. frame and covers 4 Adjustment of survey monument 71 each frame and covers f� 5 Survey Monument Wells 14 each t • Y/Ad 6 Pavement Markings0suma .7 *3" (0.25') Asphaltic concrete 415 tons r� 3 type "B" overlay on native material for Assessment District 86-1: Falda 8 *2" (.17') Asphaltic concrete156 tons ' / type B" overlay on native material r for Assessment District 86-4: Cayucos f-s 9 * Cayucos 0.5', Type "A" 100 Lin. Ft.,� �� O O •� Asphaltic concrete dike TOTAL $ LG * These items are to be a part of the Overlay Project - 1986/87, however shall be kept as a separate bid item. Signed: ,,/ Company: MdDeuwi� 14i t/CT)Dt� C�OHDdt1�/ Address: D. BeY g�jo 4a,� Lws OB/spo 0A . y3V03 Date: License No. P-2 • �! STREET OVERLAY PROJECT 1986/87 CITY OF ATASCADERO BID NO. 86-41 ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. OTY. UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE 1 2" (.17') Asphaltic Concrete Type 13,140 tons �� ''6J' s�� cr�C "B" Overlay on existing asphaltic concrete 2 Asphaltic Emulsion Tack Coat, `'a x OC 50 tons '�,,?�.S: SS-1H @ 0.10 gal/sq.yd. - 3 Adjustments of Sewer Manhole 87 each 45/ frame and covers 4 Adjustment of survey monument 71 each frame and covers 5 Survey Monument Wells 14 each e_t „7 r 6 Pavement Markings lump sum _ s, eO ,pr OC 7 *3" (0.25') Asphaltic concrete ��� c0 „t�` 6 _ oO 415 tons type "B" overlay on native material for Assessment District 86-1: Falda 8 *2" (.17') Asphaltic concrete 156 tons type "B" overlay on native material for Assessment District 86-4: Cayucos 9 * Cayucos 0.5', Type "A" 100 Lin. Ft. � Asphaltic concrete dike TOTAL $ 3751* S7 * These items are to be a part of the Overlay Project - 1986/87, however shall be kept as a separate bid item. Signed: J1 G� Company: Address: d. �?/7 �fi r 9L?444 License No. P-2 STREET OVERLAY PROJECT 1986/87 CITY OF ATASCADERO BID NO. 86-41 ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. QTY. UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE 1 2" (.17') Asphaltic Concrete Type 13,140 tons 2 CD 3(og, 23`- "B" Overlay on existing asphaltic " concrete 2 Asphaltic Emulsion Tack Coat, 50 tons 3 O O ( SO O pv` SS-1H @ 0.10 gal/sq.yd. 3 Adjustments of Sewer Manhole 87 each 15 D frame and covers 4 Adjustment of survey monument 71 each /2 p °O 85 ZO frame and covers 5 Survey Monument Wells 14 each (,p° Z 2--:FO e c 6 Pavement Markings )lump sum �,�}-9 ° 6 44 ` c 7 *3" (0.25') Asphaltic concrete 415 tons 3 2pC> 2,80©c type "B" overlay on native material for Assessment District 86-1: Falda 8 *2" (.17') Asphaltic concrete 156 tons 3Ss� 5, 5.386 type "B" overlay on native material for Assessment District 86-4: Cayucos 9 * Cayucos 0.5' , Type "A" 100 Lin. Ft. 3 g 380°�° Asphaltic concrete dike TOTAL $ 433,738 * These items are to be a part of the Overlay Project - 1986/87, however shall , be kept.as--a sep rate bid item. Signed: / 5� A • �UZfk Company: ^, Address: r, Date: / I License No. '� QC P-2 A ` • MEMORANDUM TO: Council THROUGH: Mike Shelton, City Manager FROM: Paul Se_nssibaugh, Director of Public Works/City Engineer SUBJECT: Resolution 113-86 establishing a stop sign on Balboa Avenue at San Fernando DATE: October 7, 1986 Recommendation: The Traffic Committee recommends that Council adopt Resolution 113-86 establishing a stop intersection on Balboa at its inter- section with San Fernando. Background: Due to the configuration of the intersection, approaching traffic cannot be seen in sufficient time to react to oncoming traffic. • Discussion: The intersection is considered hazardous without traffic control and many requests for a stop sign have been received. Fiscal Impact: The cost to the City is approximately $75 and can be paid out of the 1986-87 Fiscal Year Budget - Capital Improvement ($. 50 tax) PMS/vjh RESOLUTION NO. 113-86 RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO DESIGNATING A STOP INTERSECTION ON BALBOA AVENUE AT SAN FERNANDO ROAD WHEREAS, Section 4-3. 801 et sequence of the Atascadero Municipal Code allows the City Traffic Engineer to determine the location of STOP intersections, and to place and maintain appropriate signs or markings indicating the same; and WHEREAS, the Atascadero Traffic Committee has recommended that establishing a STOP intersection on Balboa Avenue at San Fernando will alleviate a hazardous traffic condition. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Atascadero directs the City Traffic Engineer to place and maintain appropriate signs or markings indicating a STOP intersection at Balboa Avenue and San Fernando. On Motion by ,and seconded by , the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote: AYES: • NOES: ABSENT: ADOPTED: ATTEST: BOYD C. SHARITZ, City Clerk MARJORIE MACKEY,Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: ROBERT M. JONES, City Attorney PAUL M. SENSIBAUGH Director of Public Works/ City Engineer 2 ING10i13r �" • M E M O R A N D U M TO: City Manager October 13, 1986 VIA: Michael Shelton, City Manager ��_ FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director W4 SUBJECT: Lot Line Adjustment 5-86 LOCATION: 4685 Lobos APPLICANT: Ruth Riggs, Wayne and Donna Watkins (Twin Cities Eng. ) REQUEST: To adjust the property line between two existing lots of record. On September 15, 1986 the Atascadero Planning Commission considered the above-referenced subject on its consent calendar, unanimously approving the lot line adjustment request subject to the findings and • conditions contained in the attached staff report. There was no discussion on the matter and no one appeared. /ps cc: Ruth Riggs, Wayne and Donna Watkins Twin Cities Engineering • r^ City of Atascadero Item: A-3 STAFF REPORT • FOR: Planning Commission Meeting Date: 9/15/86 BY:o Meg Morris, Assistant Planner File No: LLA 5-86 Project Address: 4685 Lobos SUBJECT: Request to adjust the property line between two existing lots of record. A. LOCATION: 4685 Lobos (Lots 24, 25B, Block NC) B. SITUATION AND FACTS: 1. Request. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Adjustment to lot lines between two existing legal lots of record. 2. Applicant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Ruth Riggs, Wayne and Donna • Watkins 3. Representative. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Twin Cities Engineering 4. Site Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Parcel 1 (Lot 24) : 0.25 acres Parcel 2 (Lot 25B) : 0.33 acres 5. Streets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Nogales and Lobos Avenues are privately maintained paved roads with a 40 foot right-of-way. 6. Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .LSF-X (Limited Single Family with 1/2 acre minimum lot size) 7. Existing Use. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Residence 8. Adjacent Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . .North: RSF-Y South: RSF-Y East: LSF-X West: LSF-X 9. General Plan Designation. . . . .High Density Single Family 10. Terrain. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Moderate slope with thick • vegetation. r Lot Line Adjustment 5-86 (Riggs/Watkins/Twin Cities 7 ) 11. Environmental Status. . . . . . . . .Categorically Exempt (Class 5) C. ANALYSIS: The subject property is located in the LSF-X zone (Limited Single Family) , with a minimum lot size designation of 1/2 acre. The parcels involved in this proposed adjustment are already smaller than what is allowed. They are both legal, nonconforming lots of record. City policy has been to permit lot line adjustments in such cases provided the degree of nonconformity is not increased. The intent of this proposed adjustment is to exchange equal portions of land and maintain the current lot sizes of .33 and .25 acres each. There is an existing residence on Parcel 2 which is encroaching onto the adjacent Parcel 1. The proposed adjustment of the prop- erty line would eliminate this encroachment. In addition, this is proposed to be done without greatly altering the configuration of these parcels. The proposed map, as presented, complies wity City policies and standards. D. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of Lot Line Adjustment 5-86 based on the Findings in Exhibit A and the Conditions in Exhibit B. MM:ps ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A - Findings for Approval Exhibit B - Conditions of Approval Exhibit C - Location and Zoning Map Exhibit D - Proposed Lot Line Adjustment Map 2 Lot Line Adjustment 5-86 (Riggs/Watkins/Twin Cities) EXHIBIT A - Lot Line Adjustment 4-86 Findings for Approval August 4, 1986 FINDINGS 1. The application as submitted has been determined to be categori- cally exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. 2. The application, as submitted, will result in an equal exchange of property between the two parcels. 2. The application as submitted conforms with all applicable zoning, general plan and subdivision regulations of the City of Atascadero 3 Lot Line Adjustment 5-86 (Riggs/Watkins/Twin Cities) EXHIBIT B Lot Line Adjustment 4-86 Conditions of Approval August 4, 1986 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The lot line adjustment as generally shown on the map attachment provided herein shall be submitted in final map format or reflec- ted in a record of survey to be approved by the Community Develop- ment Department prior to recordation by the County Recorder 's Office. 2. The final map or record of survey shall reflect an equal exchange of land between the two parcels, therefore, maintaining their existing net acreages. 3. The proposed adjusted lot lines shall be surveyed and monuments set at the new property corners prior to recordation of the final map or record of survey. 4. If a final map is to be recorded, all existing improvements and easements shall be delineated thereon. In addition, a note is to appear with the following statement: "Pacific Gas & Electric Com- pany should be contacted prior to any use of the easements shown" . 5. Approval of this lot line adjustment shall expire two years from the date of approval unless a time extension has been granted pur- . suant to a written request prior to the expiration date. 4 �:,...�":.�.. \4•� ': VJ.1..1. VL" rC1.3..1:�.►_iaJ%i:,.�l...L ,•-.yr ` Jill i.*' Department , `'� ./ FEE- � yLSLJ. :U. �•. \ r ,. '�r / t. LLA ! .R. ,��. ':����• `t::Illla, .TtTo •� 1, � �"?^J r. .' � t f 4•' tS \ r e f i ! / j,i. r s !. �J 1, s � i r • ''-r"''�� � � ^( �. •,/ •t 111 f . . .. i x ♦ • '• ' ''4l' Il t Mfr,r.. �i•t ,�• '..,1•• ,P I.r�• r``. 'r:+)��\�'2' t l -i• iV••. ? �f_ - r , , .'T �.�i��,>t c�`'fiys�c..Xt �. �S.1'\ 7 . •�,�T -'mss • - `'. r'• •T' a }t -4 r y�» ^, t,!*�. i .,�7��..:��a f� j~'�'�- ••� \ y�`y �, .i» P�j F ;_. t '►�L6'q� ���?f / ~p: F� 6` •,.� a ". •:� �rt '-'d tt ► p a;:c, JTti,.>-,��..q � V � �\.. � � � S11' c .�� ! � �. • •..' 7�� .?2i j�' ��,y'�!���^�'.b/.E,aVn'yt„y��'���•-�1•i+ 5'x•��,�"`e,\0 ;s+''1 .7.s77\J 3•y • .s�. y/ "r y��tee• t t�V —.i/ ^,7 Mo ,�j t��p.. � .��•'' t: \�\• T�s•byr.,l R !+Y I `\.✓:ss /rT• /�1.. S .,'y° \•"� L`�\__\��>.ay��S• LSC .oi»�� • � y{y.. ae S � ems,1-7��,a f'� r-.:f . f, .�� a.,r•+f.•ta�,�rc` / ♦ .�•�r sst�F.:.f .:�.'� . .ta �,4\ �'S' �.� .. ':7i:\3r,T Ci 0 a�Sr ,._ a e r•s:s 1' ". e.T, 8 .u ae c `\ y.l \• • K ' E�� � szD' !,<e� ssys�� !:>sn1Ti,:, fa •''" •)'���a�,lf� � �� �w;,f/ `.. ;ice / s t r /t �f �s;r!1s\,��4^T'r r s•s SS ..\a � ice. , �'� � ,° :e, ^r•.\ r S \$te_• r.''. y, t •T4 t• - at \a� •�` 'LTtG , ys� sls -1,�` .. \ �• '.. i�,7.a 4.1 •.Ts 4a,a./;:+',' 1•t' �` e i �' � ^•r: j �� s� I`it'!tn�`AJ.•��Tf,�ir'i /. • / :a? ;7 J�i- l•' ��;.1,�l(. ',�Z].�5iu ..rs • :r<-' y/J� ..s+'" 7, N .'t� bf.>r.is: Tjy$F.Y.. +ssr- "m to Viy za J�\\ .r'C.��" ,•e _�6; 3'1.i Tti,+7.yr.r4°'� ,p... *t �• �r�� � �,;#�x..r Sl yl, �� / r Y-•' : b�,;;%sr•y : I, , � . \\ �!\ :.,jG,lt , ; s� a•Ta,. ,✓n� .�o' e» ,� f�;T`7' 4Q.1. �',,...: �`�('..'�i::)e , yp/ •a `w itri b / ` 't, \ y` s' �,1 /�ty, ..•t�:. 1 ;! yF .yiee. s_�i'e :w� `.�"•��`t\4�,� . `a7e�'s +D 07aj; ,.,;.lr� ray-7o.~/•'!•r• Y e ry��'.�',t.'.��� t: �a� \ t *y �jP� r:�•ayfi°��FY \ '�+�7•..:3 •ir .C }� 'ara `!l� as .x! �j°o '"'?`�u+.,r` �' r,s.,•1�T � �✓ t 4�rt4, , ��\�`=�N.ee`'�,�'��,��a�,� .`S'r<.t .. �,ai:�^.��•�`.`��� -',,. u»i.,G• l�%e� ��. �'jR t\4!.` rt st �/���rt ��•i �-• \ �\\� �tty <l•�q.•y.� . .�a�.. z <:.,• 'or7�`, j '�'•,c ��_} 's�: VA _t//'F ': +. Jr• �� Via•�`'+� 4+�\ \„_a;•:`e>%'a, . n .m:�• ..', .,i .r �.•„eo �.i•'. 'a�u SAt�- •F �"'a , oho/ �;l f'�i" ` �,,� `��..( y', �:.�,r) •n:,:t.l�I J \j+�j•\ � .�.S:�o a°° :•i:. a+��se\tom✓ri!r^y��''���\� res.i °•'• .. /�.',`' �/•„--�a ,/. i"r{�,' 'C�`�'•'•)\� G ' :� . •�. �� {fir f�� '- _ r� � � . �atY, a ; ,•' ; Rt' .''�e 7�y•r74';i�: +t 't:i3s •�(( ��`+T\y1^ - y s ' ',.�i �,-'S,\ra� ea s '"� •moo` rf» ZJ 111 tae •F �/. .••tea, �,�}:M �:� r ti' � :. \ ` � '• t� i'il``1-..i '!:.'�,►N ,.Fs v>.1. •' 7w y' t"1~ _ _ 4t tiq.y4!^7^�r^:tir,`• I'+; :q.. '£ ''e .nJ } • ) t .,..�• r i3Oe pp t• f•`"a•�IaN.a ^ Si_,�`". 'e"e .a ay .,�� r`�'••„'-�!�:' ` �- ' •'�aW�w T• bait rr t•Par+S sL•o Il' .e.a a i•�_Q i3 �` .t�{� +•� y�.,Y`'�,`,_ 63 M p4°� 's•, h' .:�y'• swstp" • � r ° ,"<-f:-�',, i "c �` +i t1.�/'1•:Le 10 - v R•,�I,•,�.4 j/Y�! '.>,./ fa S / lis J + ''�rf � � t'+M •,\`t sn -. ri•^Y�. (4�`_'`'L� Pl e.^.��•.• L .°.° ':� as: !er ^Qy�r= p t ' � rh�y- ! •7 '.k. ^ w r y _ t. ,.• }' .y.``Q.- '��' .+ z'. . .. .`. 'at,. a �I- r./* sO9 4t,\- a' � f- s �C Y? '\ .h. i�t,l_[ �'�,li yRO iop . r+ i r To •\ !t L1Q if •• ^,g- �. XY,-4yT•^f 2'��1{! , • f•s Z' R''S71 .L r :1 y �+•'\�e i£4 f—� s Ie T so rL \ -)• ta1,/�ll _ ..� �pr�il��p/• �'•�"`7�,,,-�++[<:�„t.` �+��'t..}nj04�� 1 s'sS i• 5-�'frs�ws � t3�� �Q.1j�s (�`�4_1'•'/~ .,��, ... 'e"%•T"� s �-� :,.� ': '�?~�. `S^t+5r.�<,"�'is'I' 'qa8�,.ft ,77�5�9SE$'�° S- s ro .Z,te yw .1... p.C`,N__t��` +� �'yi�� .. 'L �r<..Dtr a• F//�,2�Tv f .-\ J J d " 'd•, �s r t: ,.. .ia.•!.T w 't � '�'' �� �\ ,�• �•• -`� +cam -1 �,/as� l"> *.,;,fit.•. r,y 7 ,.ar rae y5_W S t {' rsf , - - �.`3�f1'J�'•T R1 � •' ��� 6- - �, If`/ ota�vtt,., =f !'• 7 ;.ii <j>t...ti, � .b , w's �'r!'..�7'e fh�a�• w .o `a1Ysr,ie I:s �.5.�• ti44,i•[.t'''•.Jy',�,�.� .a•'� ♦••' A4`• yw,• > \ lrr. Is fl,•. )` > 1' /?��Q.� 7�� , .•'a' ' '�{\/,I^li� f �l Z,.G�E'_N �'%%�' •7FL aa'°• NG�SL{3.�\ ,r /1F-Ct-t• S�V'!,4/Yr(a �` ri a C7_L r • �� ��'l,��`p' Y:ci' ,../ i' � �:' C F z �i. fLf tv ,r'';:year, 7 eS i' �''C h/,-. C-. "Yt:i" 7•n 'S'\� t�"• �� f�,� I,!• ;�•\ L •J{. T • '•` y�„yt,,.► Nom?`••rb;1 . •1 .�+;�. „So'� ,;,� � f r t \�f 4 RMF .. :.`.•:, ,C•• Or .:� .\t,t�3t� ��t•_ ��. � r„�: ss.',{�'ic •�_7,,, ,_��,y.Cid�,i�`�` '!•. � '.•'��/. r\ rw .%r\���wd',�'•.�V� �7a•r _ � ty,�,y7 '�='s//:S.T:i:�'�.- — � ,y�b "� p h ss_o ss` i'° s•n, s7n•r1S:I a�a+UPA a'�!v 4i'�!•11�r y:: 3: '1 "� LA .. . . __ f ct:.• .,�a j������!Y 5,•0,a tc "'it,_� '„b �r et zit ._.... . s'zse: ;,;' - _ I .•`��' t. lip's t» , "x •t ,}a. g•:�.[`•'-/ •-zsto ._._..__—� .. Kl— LUG «! ” ^qr a � a .. �.�•�. �•,•7•-+-TTr+►n7+r�r•,• �••s: .. t .. . `•t�=''v�Td-- •tl'��S'F�..+e, ,. ,y�rry •w*::.;. _:;: "`,..� t;':cSi�^• • ,,•,Sa .y / a P• �`r•.r�r«?•',i'J/:. $' �, � t .: J'' ' .d �.•C.. °�'.^• �� ,r.ri :v, 77'•�� •P:\}7:l„•T-•i� e �`i t7 �•''` r. rii M7 .,.•�t.``�e.,,�"'.,w r� • RNF/o 7G / 144 �1 :2 t ................. )ON J triy hr: � 1 //•F 1�YY y'p \ � M �� 14, AA D CA Ln � O a C y m n m -10 F fZ, T r •� r 4l —� -� � 3zR�nR � ^ � o v � NG AGENDA DA'P� 10/13/86 ITEM # A - 10 M E M O R A N D U M TO: City Manager October 13, 1986 VIA: Michael Shelton, City Manager - FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director 4W SUBJECT: Lot Line Adjustment 6-86 LOCATION: 10755/10855 Atascadero Road APPLICANT: Gloria Garcia (Cuesta Engineering) REQUEST: To adjust the property line between two existing lots of record. On September 15, 1986 the Atascadero Planning Commission considered the above-referenced subject on its consent calendar, unanimously approving the lot line adjustment request subject to the findings and • conditions contained in the attached staff report. There was no discussion on the matter and no one appeared. /PS cc: Gloria Garcia Cuesta Engineering • L, City of Atascadero Item:-A-4 STAFF REPORT FOR: Planning Commission Meeting Date: 9/15/86 BY: J ,Steven L. DeCamp, Senior Planner File No: LLA 6-86 Project Address: 10755/10855 Atascadero Road SUBJECT: Request to adjust the property line between two existing lots of record. A. LOCATION: 10755/10855 Atascadero Road (Lot 21, Block 35) B. SITUATION AND FACTS: 1. Request. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Adjustment of lot line between two existing lots. 2. Applicant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Gloria Garcia 3. Representative. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Cuesta Engineering 4. Site Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4.9 acres 5. Streets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Atascadero Road is a paved, City maintained street with a 50 foot right-of-way. 6. Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .RS (Residential Suburban) 7. Existing Use. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Shed and corral/vacant 8. Adjacent Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . .North: RS South: RS East: RS West: Unincorporated 9. General Plan Designation. . . . .Suburban Single Family 10. Terrain. . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . .The site is gently sloping to flat. 11. Environmental Status. . . . . . . . .Categorically Exempt (Class 5) C. ANALYSIS: The subject property is located in the RS (Residential Suburban) • zone. Minimum lot size in this zone ranges between 2. 5 and 10 acres depending upon the outcome of the various performance stand- ,; 9 Lot Line Adjustment 186 (Gloria Garcia/Cuesta Engineering) ards. For this particular site, the minimum lot size criteria are: Distance from center (12,000-14,0001 ) 0.40 Septic suitability (well-suited) 0.50 Average slope (0-10%) 0.50 Condition of access (paved) 0.40 General neighborhood character (1.92 acres) 0.38 Criteria score 2.18 acres Minimum lot size: 2.50 acres One of the parcels proposed for this lot line adjustment is al- ready smaller than what the Zoning Ordinance would allow (a legal nonconforming lot of record) . The other existing parcel is a conforming lot with acreage in excess of the required minimum lot size. The proposed lot line adjustment would make the parcels 2.40 acres and 2.50 acres. City policy has been to permit lot line adjustments in such cases provided the degree of nonconformity is not increased. The pro- posed adjustment will not increase the degree of nonconformity; it will, in fact, bring one lot closer to City standards while main- taining the conformity of the other lot. The smaller of the two parcels contains a shed and a corral. The larger parcel is vacant. It is staff' s determination that the adjustment of the property line will provide building sites which will be appropriate for single family development with on-site waste disposal systems. The proposed map, as presented, complies wtih City policies and standards. D. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Lot Line Adjustment 6-86 based on the Findings in Exhibit A and the Conditions in Exhibit B. SLD:ps ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A - Findings for Approval Exhibit B - Conditions of Approval Exhibit C - Location and Zoning Map Exhibit D - Proposed Lot Line Adjustment Map 2 ,a, Lot Line Adjustment f-86 (Gloria Garcia Cuesta tineering) EXHIBIT A - Lot Line Adjustment 6-86 Findings for Approval September 15, 1986 FINDINGS: 1. The application as submitted has been determined to be categori- cally exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. 2. The application as submitted conforms with all applicable zoning, general plan and subdivision regulations of the City of Atascadero. 3 Lot Line Adjustment 6-86 (Gloria Garcia/Cuesta Engineering) EXHIBIT B - Lot Line Adjustment 6-86 Conditions of Approval September 15, 1986 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The lot line adjustment as generally shown on the map attachment provided herein shall be submitted in final map format or reflec- ted in a record of survey to be approved by the Community Develop- ment Department prior to recordation by the County Recorder ' s Office. 2. The proposed adjusted lot lines shall be surveyed and' monuments set at the new property corners prior to recordation of the final map or record of survey. 3. If a final map is to be recorded, all existing improvements and easements shall be delineated thereon. 4. Approval of this lot line adjustment shall expire two years from the date of approval unless a time extension has been granted pur- suant to a written request prior to the expiration date. 4 EXA 1131 l G I 1 1 :4.. elm•,L:�t,r_^ ..* ?, ' ,. ;f;_t�\\^ L(A 6,— $6 A. e 110 (LS 0 0 =. . R /?6 �? of 4 13 1 P ld5`P ILJ\tMl K 14 3 33 \A \o �uRS - $ o 35 , 13 1 / e•P 4431 .��' ld'•,p n x,34 13 + 33 • RS(FH) O'A 22IN 49 .• 1 +ebe't 31 3 �� 'o,+e•`•ea 4e \o�Np� ease 3e -w 30 "- ,._ \ ; \ - +37 ' " "hh w L. ►3;p64° '3..rtr eat` JJ li 13 4. 20 3 39 36o•�, a Y 1�7 oS a Y 24 43 40 P- u . 43 42 0 t2 44 2 JJ ^ oip 19 .4. �� :a ' 90 R f\J(1 1 f� 47 S HJ1 .:... �/ ,d1ti5 24 22 20 ct x! p 46 21 66 P 47 \ cle 54- . 5 7D 3. 2% xa ;' 6 3 44 ' _ f \\CPO ti X20 +oP� ,"h 9�4 C)3. 4x A. x- x \\\ 1 �o Iq n ... • . o 1 Bj ' 30 �' co - 76309 o ii=2i• 41 1 104 li1R 2 \ ?Alt.C 32 % s .o38 _ ♦p?� �� p fa+ fes. 7 32 39 �q O ►Nl A 3e 9i 10 11 ,34 l l.r.a1..:i{il�= •w..wkar.....i Lei 77 3 e ,. iuu`1"•1•w M271::...r•. r �..rn..we o Sy t r �Itr p - `(V�o ertr .aupeo._:4•...•I a•.w•.r.Ltww� >'" o 9r 19 Y 17HlJ I..lrr.•.1t.4:..e.r I.• .. �` ,+ °^t e 20 w•. n.La 4.n el..•w ' 12 _ Q-�Q^.•cAl,,,ny.:., �`- .r ..4 7 �o�h , 21 y (FHnil-4 1 44 <l.r /�.(•- � _` \ CITY OF ATASCADERO _ � ��kl Plannino Department 24 it 1�1 T RS(FH) Manr Nom_ P,2 �� IL = 14 •WEEPING AGENDA- . DATA 10/13/$6 ITEM # A I M E M O R A N D U M TO: City Manager October 13, 1986 VIA: Michael Shelton, City Manager , , , FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Tentative Parcel Map 13-86 LOCATION: 7300 San Gregorio Road APPLICANT: Conrad Langille (Daniel J. Stewart) REQUEST: To subdivide 12.12 acres into four lots of 2.85, 3.10, 3.10, and 3.10 acres each. On September 15, 1986 the Planning Commission conducted a public hear- ing on the above-referenced subject, unanimously approving the land division request subject to the findings and conditions contained in the attached staff report. There was brief discussion concerning adequate provision for access for fire vehicles to the site. It was noted that the applicant had been in contact with staff and had indicated there were no concerns with the staff report. No one appeared on the matter . /ps cc: Conrad Langille Daniel J. Stewart • City of Atascadero Item: B-1 STAFF REPORT FOR: Planning Commission Meeting Date: 9/15/86 BY: Joel Moses, Associate Planner File No: TPM 13-86 Project Address: 7300 San Grego. io Road SUBJECT: Request to subdivide 12.12 +/- acres- of vacant residential land into four lots of 2.85, 3.10, 3.10 and 3.10 acres, and to establish a pri- vate street name of Ropa Court. BACKGROUND: Notice of public hearing was published in the Atascadero News on Fri- day, September 5, 1986 and all prooperty owners of record located within 300 feet of the roect subject property were also notified on that date. A. LOCATION: 7300 San Gregorio Road (Ptn. Lots 11 & 12, Block 51) B. SITUATION AND FACTS: 1. Request. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Subdivision of 12.12 acres into four lots of 2. 85, 3.10, 3.10 and 3.10 acres each. 2. Applicant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Conrad Langille 3. Representative. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Daniel J. Stewart 4. Site Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12.12 acres 5. Streets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .San Gregorio Road has a 40 foot right-of-way and is a not a City-maintained street. 6. Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .RS (Residential Suburban - 2 1/2 to 10 acre minimum lot size) 7. Existing Use. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Vacant property with P.G.&E. high power electrical transmis- sion lines 8. Adjacent Zoning and Use. . . . . .North: RS, residential South: RS, residential East: RS, residential • West: RS, residential Tentative Parcel Ma �3-86 Conrad L n 1 D p ( a gil e/ aniel J. Stewart) 9. General Plan Designation. . . . .Suburban Residential 10. Terrain. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .A north facing sloping site with a drainage swale splitting the site. Running north to south, the site has an abundance of native oaks and native grasses. 11. Environmental Status. . . . . . . . .Negative Declaration C. ANALYSIS: The property proposed for subdivision is located in the RS (Resi- dential Suburban) zone. Minimum lot size in this zone ranges be- tween 2.5 and 10.0 acres depending upon the site characteristics. For this site, the minimum lot size criteria are: Distance from center (16,000-18,0001 ) 0.60 Septic suitability (moderate) * 0.75 Average slope (11%-20%) 0.75 Condition of access (paved) 0.40 General neighborhood character (2.99 acres) 0.60 Minimum lot size: 3.00 acres *Note: Septic suitability based upon on-site percolation tests. The applicant proposes four lots of which all but one exceed the minimum lot size. Parcel 1 contains only 2.85 acres but the ad- joining lots exceed the minimum so that a minor adjustment to the property lines could be accomplished without much difficulty. The proposed site contains 12.12 +/- acres of sloping hillsides averaging 11% to 20%. The building sites are somewhat limited due to a slope and large P.G. & E. transmission line cutting the area in two. The easement area can be used only for a limited set of uses governed by P.G. & E. Of primary concern is the access. P.G. & E. has noted that access will be given, but specific de- signs will have to be approved by P.G. & E. Information submitted covering percolation tests and topography shows that the remaining areas do contain four potential building sites. Each of the proposed lots has an adequate building site. Proper siting of building pads and driveways should result in a minimal amoung of required grading. Any grading that is required for driveways or building pads on slopes in excess of 20% will require a precise plan review and approval. Precise plan review is done at staff level and is dictated by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and this City' s guidelines for its implementation. 2 Tentative Parcel Mai-86 P IRConrad Lan ille Danl J. Stewart ( g / ) Access to the site is from San Gregorio Road and an existing 600 foot long private access easement. Due to the length and the num- ber of lots that could be possibly served by the private road, the road should meet private road standards and receive a street name. In discussion with the applicant, the name Ropa Court was submit- ted. The proposed name meets the guidelines for new street names in the City of Atascadero. Ropa is spanish for linen. The pro- posed name has also been reviewed with the emergency services agencies and no conflicts with existing street names were noted. D. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends conditional approval of Tentative Parcel Map 13-86 based upon the Findings in Exhibit C and the Conditions in Exhibit D, and the establishment of the name "Ropa Court" for the proposed private road. JM:ps ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A - Location/Zoning Map Exhibit B - Parcel Map Exhibit C - Findings for Approval Exhibit D - Conditions of Approval 3 Tentative Parcel Map 13-86 (Conrad Langille/Daniel J. Stewart) EXHIBIT C - Tentative Parcel Map 13-86 • Findings for Approval September 15, 1986 FINDINGS: 1. The proposed parcel map is in conformance with the General Plan policies and land use designation of Suburban Single Family (2 and 1/2 to 10 acre minimum lot size) and the site' s RS (Residen- tial Suburban) zoning designation and lot standards. 2. The creation of these parcels, in conformance with the recommended conditions of approval, will not have a significant adverse effect upon the environment. The Negative Declaration prepared for the project is adequate. 3. The site is, physically suitable for the type of development that is proposed. 4. The site is physically suitable for the density of development that is proposed. 5. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish and wildlife or their habitat. 6. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvement will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision; or that substantially equivalent alternate easements are provided. 7. The proposed subdivision complies with Section 66474. 6 of the State Subdivision Map Act as to methods of handling and discharge of waste. • 4 Tentative Parcel Map C-86 (Conrad Langille/Daniel J. Stewart) EXHIBIT D - Tentative Parcel Map 13-86 . Conditions of Approval September 15, 1986 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. Road improvement plans for Ropa Court, prepared by a registered civil engineer, shall be submitted and approved by the Public Works, Community Development and Fire Departments prior to the recordation of the map. Improvement plans shall also include: a. Installation of a fire hydrant 800 feet from San Gregorio Road with the exact location and design to be approved by the Fire Chief. b. Ropa Court shall be designed to private road standards having a minimum 20 foot wide road bed and a 16 foot wide paved surface with a 3" deep, 2 foot wide gravel shoulders. Paving shall be a minimum of 2" A.C. with turns having a minimum of a 50 foot centerline radius. C. Public utilities shall be shown or alternative utilities easements shall be provided. d. Install all street signs, traffic delineation devices, warn- ing and regulatory signs, guardrail, barricades, and other similar devices where required by the Public Works Director . Signs shall be in conformance with the Public Works Depart- ment standards and the current state of California uniform sign chart. Installation of traffic devices shall be subject to review and modifications after construction. e. Submit proof, as required by the Public Works Department, that access roads are designed within their legal easements. f. Prior to approval of the improvement plans by the Public Works Director, either the subdivider shall acquire suffi- cient title or interest in the off-site land to allow the improvements to be made as required by these conditions; or the City Council, upon request by and at the expense of the subdivider, shall have made all appropriate findings and adopted a Resolution of Necessity as required by law so that the City may exercise its power of Iminent Domain. 2. The tentative map shall be revised to have each lot contain a min- imum of 3.0 acres of land. 3. A road maintenance agreement, in a form acceptable to the City Attorney, shall be recorded with the deed to each parcel at the time it is first conveyed and a note to this eff-ect shall be placed on the final map. 5 Tentative Parcel Ma f3-86 Conrad Lan ille Daniel J. Stewart Mapf3-8'6 9 / ) 4. Obtain an encroachment permit frbm the Public Works Department prior to issuance of a building permit and construct the standard paved driveway connection as directed by the encroachment permit prior to final building inspection. 5. All drainage swales on the property shall be delineated on the final map. 6. The 25 foot ingress/egress easements serving the new parcels and joint driveway easements shall also be noted as a Public Utilities Easement. 7. Plan and profile drawings of proposed individual driveways and driveway easements shall be submitted for approval by the Communi- ty Development and Public Works Departments in order to determine average grade, appropriate improvement requirements, and easement locations prior to the recordation of the final map. 8. Water shall be obtained from the Atascadero Mutual Water Company and water lines shall exist at the frontage of each parcel or its public utility easement prior to recordation of the final map. 9. All existing and proposed utility easements, pipelines and other easements are to be shown on the final map. If there are other building or other restrictions related to the easements, they shall be noted on the final map. 10. Grading, drainage, and erosion control plans, prepared by a regis- tered civil engineer , shall be submitted for review and approval by the Community Development and Public Works Departments prior to issuance of building permits in conjunction with installation of driveways, access easements or structures. This shall appear as a note on the final map. 11. All development fees and/or assessments in effect at the time of building permit application shall be paid at the time of building permit issuance. This shall appear as a note on the final map. 12. A final map drawn -in substantial conformance with the approved tentative map and in compliance with all conditions set forth herein shall be submitted for review and approval in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City Lot Division Ordinance prior to recordation. a. Monuments shall be set at all new property corners created and a registered civil engineer or licensed land surveyor shall indicate, by certificate on the final map, that corners have been set or shall be set by a date specific and that they will be sufficient to enable the survey to be retraced. b. A recently updated preliminary title report shall be submit- ted for review in conjunction with the processing of the final map. 13. Approval of this tentative parcel map shall expire two years from 6 CITY Or' r SCA E-*- Y t _'�, Planning L epartlr ellt 10. elz 13 �.. O64 C30> r 0,6 •! tr zt SfTLt 730D -Skl CW=ID50 5�V Y x• _. ` ,' /�� �' ,: -TED�TTRT111� Yf�l�1.IM'Pr�13•f�G \ 34 ss `•�. to 13 Ic 20 So 39 fe49' 4 •o-a e Q i� �, r• �� 41 rF•�ys C. •- j, 1. IAa .. , s• , ...:ir •tai • •�_ 45 44 fir �.: cam =: �•r �O E '+ • '�� • �Jww - 'i'.f'.•:�J 8 'T' +.'' + � i +S ,' •, � � `s•i-.. •�Vr Y Ol• r 1 f �� '�i $. •°! J r--._ (t�'_ � . - •sem. !'r.\ 'at`•.'�: .r,; X ...s...n (A I.Z.I.`�- + !t �. !! to sl ]!~ sf ^�. - `��"Yom; 9. ,••.�• ]-'� :, � -;.11'- 1 ' /•ti ; ,i/ � (i K.J ' .,. 31 .E—r'�•. ,,_.... .' .` , r ,� ]l r 74 �.�:�* `� �...�•.�. rte.;' ., � . ."`°;,. � v+ ,�,,;�,:;-, �••• �. •`•{•t�a�,°•3� L2 to X26 24 RS 14 22 10 "fes`. _ --- ,_._.� _1 \_�•+ to 20 / ---{-- --- — EM1151T A ZONlNL: LLY-A- lON 730 SAI' G-Q,� tO TE&WO Q V J • " i Q� r WZ4 W WNQ ArrAi ""t 2001 •e ! > dlplhw S OW cz ;���) i ``, 0000- � .•L4,.,�� _ a N!°�/ 4.1. \'^ N / 16 Vil "116 61 •v1A �/ :rYrrt� (�� y � 1 'r�, ►1 41 wsar e V ,ti i ^ M s e CXN lF3 I "E • Y 7SCD 574� LR7=lu Pl ONO z L M6 LLE • -TDjP%ZT MEETWO./13/86 AGENDA A 12 DAT: i.EM # M E M O R A N D U M TO: City Manager October 13, 1986 VIA: Michael Shelton, City Manager A'1� -- FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director Ja SUBJECT: Tentative Parcel Map 22-86 LOCATION: 5120 and 5300 San Benito APPLICANT: Patricia St. Clair/Audrey Cook/Gifford Bland (Volbrecht Surveys) (Golden West Development) REQUEST: To subdivide 10. 26 acres into four lots of 2. 74, 2. 52, 2.50 , and 2. 50 acres each. On September 15, 1986 the Planning Commission conducted a public hear- ing on the above-referenced subject, unanimously approving the land division request subject to the findings and conditions contained in the attached staff report, with modification to Condition #9 as follows: "9. Improve the existing drive approach and access easement to improve site distance to the satisfaction of the Community Development and Public Works Departments. " Richard Shannon, representing the applicant, noted the new owners for this property were Golden West Development. He spoke in support of the project and made some general comments concerning the report. There was brief discussion concerning the existing driveway location which is the access for the two existing residences. No one else appeared on the matter . /ps cc: Patricia St. Clair/Audrey Cook/Gifford Bland Volbrecht Surveys Golden West Development 0 i City of Atascadero Item: B-2 STAFF REPORT S FOR: Planning Commission Meeting Date: 9/15/86 BY: Aeg Morris, Assistant Planner File No: TPM 22-86 Project Address: 5120 and 5300 San Benito SUBJECT: Request to subdivide two residential lots into four parcels containing 2.74, 2.52, 2.50, and 2. 50 acres each. BACKGROUND: Notice of public hearing was published in the Atscadero Newson Friday September 5, 1986 and all property owners of record located within 300 feet of the subject site were also notified on that date. A. LOCATION: 5120 and 5300 San Benito (Lots 19, 20, Block 22) B. SITUATION AND FACTS: 1. Request. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .To subdivide 10.26 acres into four lots containing 2.74 , 2.52, 2, 50, and 2.50 acres each. 2. Applicant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Patricia St. Clair/Audrey Cook/ Gifford Bland 3. Representative. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Volbrecht Surveys/Golden West Development 4. Site Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .10.26 acres (approximately) 5. Streets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .San Benito Road is a City-main- taied road with a 40 foot right- of-way. 6. Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .RS (Residential Suburban) with a 2 1/2 to 10 acre minimum lot size 7. Existing Use. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Proposed Parcels A and B have existing residences. Proposed Parcels C and D are presently vacant. 8. Adjacent Zoning and Use. . . . . .North: RS, vacant • South: RS, residence East: RS, residence West: RS, residence Tentative Parcel Ma f2=86 Golden West olbrechSurve s P ( /VfY ) 9. General Plan Designation. . . . .Suburban Single Family 10. Terrain. . . . . . . . . . . . . .Gently rolling 11. Environmental Status. . . . . . . . .Negative Declaration C. ANALYSIS: A lot line adjustment application between Lots 19, 20 and 21 in Block 22 was submitted for review in May, 1986 . This adjustment of property lines was intended to resolve existing encroachment problems between these three lots. The final map for the adjust- ment was accepted by City Council on July 28, 1986 . The proposed subdivision site is located in the RS zone where the minimum lot size ranges between 2 1/2 and 10 acres, depending on the outcome of the minimum lot size criteria contained in the Zon- ing Ordinance. For this site, the minimum lot size criteria are: Distance from center (8-10,000) 0.25 Septic suitability (well-suited) * 0.50 Average slope (11-20%) 0.75 Condition of access (City-paved) 0.40 General neighborhood character (1.80 acres) 0.36 Minimum lot size: 2. 26 acres *Note: Septic suitability is based upon on-site percolation tests. Although the total of the lot size criteria is 2. 26 acres, the designated zoning allows the minimum lot size to reach 2.5 acres only. The lot sizes proposed are either equal to or larger than the allowable minimum lot size. Both Parcels A and B have existing residences; Parcels C and D are presently vacant with the exception of a cement slab on Parcel D which is the remains of an old chicken house. The two vacant pro- posed parcels each have adequate potential building sites for fu- ture residential development. The amount of grading for both driveways and building pads can be kept to a minimum since the sites are relatively level. The pro- posed parcels are adequate in size to provide for private on-site sewage disposal systems. There is concern over the existing driveway location which is the access for the two existing residences on Parcels A and B. There is extremely poor sight distance to the northeast as you exit the driveway onto the public right-of-way. This could be remedied by re-aligning the driveway encroachment location while still making use of the existing driveway. 2 Tentative Parcel MapP2-86 (Golden West/Volbrech Surveys) The proposed density for this site is appropriate for the area and conforms with City policies. i D. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Tentative Parcel Map 22-86 based on the Findings contained in Exhibit A and the Conditions of Approval in Exhibit B. MM:ps ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A - Findings for Approval Exhibit B - Conditions of Approval Exhibit C - Location Map Exhibit D - Proposed Parcel map i 3 Tentative Parcel Ma q2-86 0 p (Golden West/Volbrech�Surveys) EXHIBIT A - Tentative Parcel Map 22-86 Findings for Approval September 15, 1986 FINDINGS: 1. The creation of these parcels conforms to the Zoning Ordinance and the General Plan. 2. The creation of these parcels, in conformance with the recommended conditions of approval, will not have a significant adverse effect upon the environment. The Negative Declaration prepared for the project is adequate. 3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development that is proposed. A. The site is physically suitable for the density of development that is proposed. 5. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish and wildlife or their habitat. 6. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvement will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision; or that substantially equivalent alternate easements are provided. 7. The proposed subdivision complies with Section 66474.6 of the State Subdivision Map Act as to methods of handling and discharge of waste. i 4 Tentative Parcel MapIR2-86 (Golden West/Volbrecq Surveys) EXHIBIT B - Tentative Parcel Map 22-86 Conditions of Approval September 15, 1986 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. Water shall be obtained from the Atascadero Mutual Water Company and water lines shall exist at the frontage of each parcel or its public utility easement prior to recordation of the final map. 2. All existing and proposed utility easements, pipelines and other easements are to be shown on the final map. If there are other building or other restrictions related to the easements, they shall be noted on the final map. 3. Drainage and erosion control plans, prepared by a registered civil engineer, shall be submitted for review and approval by the Commu- nity Development Department prior to issuance of building permits in conjunction with installation of driveways, access easements or structures. This shall appear as a Note on the final map. 4. Plan and profile drawings of proposed individual driveways and driveway easements shall be submitted for approval by the Communi- ty Development and Public Works Departments in order to determine average grade and appropriate improvement requirements. This shall appear as a note on the final map. 5. Up grade existing fire hydrant to City standards prior to recordation of the final map. 6. The cement slab encroachment between Parcels B and D shall be eliminated prior to recordation of the final map. 7. Obtain an encroachment permit from the Public Works Department and construct improvements as directed by the encroachment permit prior to recording the final map. Pave a two foot shoulder and dike and construct City standard drive approach. 8. An offer for dedication to the Public for a Public Utilities Ease- ment shall be made for the six foot P.U.E. adjacent to the right- of-way along the entire property frontage. Offers of dedication shall be completed and recorded prior to or simultaneously to recording the final map. 9. -Abarmdon the existing drive approach and relncate access easement mer sout4v4e-s-t to improve sight distance, ?0. All conditions herein specified shall be complied with prior to filing of the final map. 5 r f Tentative Parcel Ma q2-86 p (Golden West/Volbrech�Surveys) 11. A final map drawn in substantial conformance with the approved tentative map and in compliance with all conditions set forth herein shall be submitted for review and approval in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City Lot Division Ordinance prior to recordation. a. Monuments shall be set at all new property corners created and a registered civil engineer or licensed land surveyor shall indicate, by certificate on the final map, that corners have been set or shall be set by a date specific and that they will be sufficient to enable the survey to be retraced. b. A recently updated preliminary title report shall be submit- ted for review in conjunction with the processing of the final map. 12. Approval of this tentative parcel map shall expire two years from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted pursuant to a written request prior to the expiration date. • 6 '€ a+3�f/ r \.. 74 \� yYgp 4pr 41 dye //�• it `o/ �� / 1 ey � RS ' AA IEX-H 16 • 4.- LOCATb N MAP 39 ,rp ' j`�fo ' ^^�~ ^•,/'O/NJ �•'Rof 33 \ 62 3/ \� —Tp' ' 1 34 33 31 3 • •,4 ::.;'� sr 7t.;y; s2 31 70 r.•-�--�' `� Y �t t .�Y�B s:! IQ/2 t 1 I O//ArT )O �•�,: �` \ .j�/Al fir .if q• y �.�^ 14 1 / N-�. S.f °� ,./ -\Ibh t' •/�13+ .. !a .. .r• _ {.t �e•� r ,e111 134j�� •.•�0 - /,1 10 / 2n :j 1* r {.• t: t°r • a 1L" to 94 ��� -� , , `' ...:t� w° Li •••1'w •11. 71'' . c 11 �' 4 \r ` „ t .. 11 +. / .� ,y�•j 2 � � tr. aal - �• t ti� 4./ ,s•y 5eh 21 V. IO�ej � \ ••✓. \ mow `:�- 1 •� � e�•ee � im � I w N � 7�,! 12 •. _..... _ a " i a'•�yfpO�a`jit\\\�'" •dj` ���- "�aS�s e/ � a sofs 847 w M: ' •.. ae4 iSe°P,,; 2 • q an a.:(.air aH 'r /r • / ..M���\`\` �,p'� �fy���alife ti o. � Ne Ya 9 m wC isis p rus »•+ta Ger saw j I's 21 Cb r� >."'•�i.tar �% ,"\' ., • tat 34 1:8. �b 4•" �� n sea "ii1 1 iw:s a g ,.4 na `°: r , 11-6 e u. T .° �° rar/•. •.rr- Sra' a r1 �' aa• t :•:. • mss• sr sew t1i 11Hnt ' rt ,a m 73 • J ! �/ N qac/ '1 a. ' y.1y ! ... w .., y �•. P iy U• qA ll.e Nf. i- �.- : lee • � •' L •\ � w/li .�!`',a:-• ' £ 7• "l/• 177 131 n '^•N aNe Ye :' : .1•II \ \. 4• '1°y.�/a;S� r r3 ya7nr• i 1 ;E ° ! •e1 •y_ :,7a �\�• , ,�••• rr:^ P is rlr laO It• .✓ 1 • Yrs re• ♦ r w.r weAl •t4 .•'\ r"� I e'�r ►. q � -0 °° M .x�t. 1 ', w r� ^ r ,n� na yy17a lnss Is - ��'��,� �♦i + ii ♦rAt3r�� rano 21; 1� ',.. w aN Iw � a ; ��� �. x� 'a' trt ` :•, 1 os '� raa Nr}} �t �' re m� ' 1 n V • !a 7N ♦'�Y�b. a S iter. ° `\ spr e°11 : •'' ^r !q _ lafo �+/ 1t,' � p°• 117' .. � N° _ - 13a° !\, `/ I•y X13 i 1 'fo .22t.'� 7i r° 3 Iw IN �'! _ � �� le eta .r..s. tft v�, ., .,c>3l... 'S.•,/n.` . .. \ � .- •+�� +,�^ .iia: 9N / a :ti � n•t • ti e "'! (.!• a.' 100 -! 102• ,• •0 I::A i ^ :r 7103 0 - a 13 4 ;moi;•• �y r4 �� 1 ; •� �♦. t 1. IL01.� 1^' 1�N•2 /y^�1'y�^�,Y/ ri 1 IOi: � 4 .P �d' IN'! �4j.5 vyiP o "1 ♦1• }34M h •r 20 to'% i♦� '� .rte/ r Ih0 ♦ 4 ^.� t#" :r• CN tfwt'►S t�f�.i e11 µ Apr t0•A 3 7Z , �• l ,"M 2t _ai ♦nAl 1 19. 22 'e 10 24 Y • rr r 7• ! f�-0r/La.'�``' T•�ir• fl/�/rr 1^ 1/M1q t/�'• iI . • 1tCV1:f.^.x •4� 14/ -� 1 ~ 1 •` ''., . S`�,,� w �a // ♦�` -+,z .• ".;',°.. GWS 77 �/ / a• 113 A 1/ Ii 4i �`�q ��� i? v W z o a NF1 a v uh�b H tirob�, 5 0 c o _Jar N 1 � � 'j .I i _/ �l I ��� iy i•.... � \ter. K � C I — b 6 t i � � 10./13/$6 �� A 13 M E M O R A N D U M TO: City Manager October 13 , 1986 VIA: Michael Shelton, City Manager 4 1 FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director . 44L SUBJECT: Tentative Parcel Map 23-86 LOCATION: 5100 San Benito APPLICANT: Patricia St. Clair/Audrey Cook/Gifford Bland (Volbrecht Surveys) (Golden West Development) REQUEST: To subdivide five acres into two parcels of 2.5 acres each On September 15, 1986 the Planning Commission conducted a public hear- ing on the above-referenced subject, unanimously approving the land division request subject to the findings and conditions contained in • the attached staff report, with modification to Condition #5 as follows: "5. Obtain an encroachment permit from the Public Works Depart- ment and construct improvements to include a City standard drive approach, as directed by the encroachment permit, prior to recording the final map. " Richard Shannon applicant, appeared, but did not comment on the PP ► PP matter. No one else appeared on the matter . /ps cc: Patricia St. Clair/Audrey Cook/Gifford Bland Volbrecht Surveys Golden West Development t1� City of Atascadero Item: B-3 STAFF REPORT FOR: Planning Commission Meeting Date: 9/15/86 Bi"AMeg Morris, Assistant Planner File No: TPM 23-86 Project Address: 5100 San Benito SUBJECT: Request to subdivide a five acre residential lot into two parcels con- taining 2.5 acres each. BACKGROUND: Notice of public hearing was published in the Atascadero News on Friday September 5, 1986 and all property owners of record located within 300 feet of the subject site were also notified on that date. A. LOCATION: 5100 San Benito (Lot 21, block 22) B. SITUATION AND FACTS: 1. Request. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .To subdivide a residential lot into two parcels of 2. 5 acres each. 2. Applicant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Patricia St. Clair/Audrey Cook/ Gifford Bland 3. Representative. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Volbrecht Surveys/Golden West Development 4. Site Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 acres (approximately) 5. Streets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .San Benito Road is a City-main- taied road with a 40 foot right- of-way. 6. Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .RS (Residential Suburban) with a 2 1/2 to 10 acre minimum lot size 7. Existing Use. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Vacant 8. Adjacent Zoning and Use. . . . . .North: RS, vacant South: RS, residence East: RS, residence West: RS, vacant Tentative Parcel Ma f-86 lo Golden West VolbrechSurve s P ( / Y ) 9. General Plan Designation. . . . .Suburban Single Family 10. Terrain. . . . . . . . .Gentl rolli . . . . . . . . . . . . . y ng with dense brush and scattered oak trees. 11. Environmental Status. . . . . . . . .Negative Declaration C. ANALYSIS: A lot line adjustment application between Lots 19, 20 and 21 in Block 22 was submitted for review in May, 1986 . This adjustment of property lines was intended to resolve existing encroachment problems between these three lots. The final map for the adjust- ment was accepted by City Council on July 28, 1986. The proposed subdivision site is located in the RS zone where the minimum lot size ranges between 2 1/2 and 10 acres, depending on the outcome of the minimum lot size criteria contained in the Zon- ing Ordinance. For this site, the minimum lot size criteria are: Distance from center (8-10,000) 0. 25 Septic suitability (well-suited) * 0.50 Average slope (11-20t) 0.75 Condition of access (City-paved) 0.40 General neighborhood character (1.80 acres) 0.36 Minimum lot size: 2.26 acres *Note: Septic suitability is based upon on-site percolation tests. Although the total of the lot size criteria is 2.26 acres, the designated zoning allows the minimum lot size to reach 2. 5 acres only, in a best case situation. The lot sizes proposed by the ap- plicant are equal to what would be allowed for the site. The parcels are thickly covered with brush and scattered scrub oak. There are a number of larger oaks at the rear of Parcel A. Each parcel is presently vacant. Future residential build-out of these proposed parcels would pre- sent few development problems. Grading can be kept to a minimum due to the gentle slopes on the sites. There is ample room for on-site sewage disposal systems. Both parcels have scattered oak trees; however , there are building sites available on both parcels which should keep tree removal at a minimum. The proposed density for this site is appropriate for the area and conforms with City policies. 2 Tentative -Parcel Map 3-86 (Golden West/Volb rec Surveys) D. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Tentative Parcel Map 23-86 based on the Findings contained in Exhibit A and the Conditions of Approval in Exhibit B. MM:ps ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A - Findings for Approval Exhibit B - Conditions of Approval Exhibit C - Location Map Exhibit D - Proposed Parcel map 3 Tentative Parcel Ma 23-86 Golden West olbrech t urve s P ( /'� Y ) EXHIBIT A - Tentative Parcel Map 22-86 Findings for Approval September 15, 1986 FINDINGS: 1. The creation of these parcels conforms to the Zoning Ordinance and the General Plan. 2. The creation of these parcels, in conformance with the recommended conditions of approval, will not have a significant adverse effect upon the environment. The Negative Declaration prepared for the project is adequate. 3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development that is proposed. 4. The site is physically suitable for the density of development that is proposed. 5.- The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish and wildlife or their habitat. 6. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvement will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision; or that substantially equivalent alternate easements are provided. 7. The proposed subdivision complies with Section 66474. 6 of the State Subdivision Map Act as to methods of handling and discharge of waste. 4 Tentative P - ive arcel MapIR3 86 (Golden West/Volbrecht Surveys) EXHIBIT B - Tentative Parcel Map 23-86 Conditions of Approval September 15, 1986 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. Water shall be obtained from the Atascadero Mutual Water Company and water lines shall exist at the frontage of each parcel or its public utility easement prior to recordation of the final map. 2. All existing and proposed utility easements, pipelines and other easements are to be shown on the final map. If there are other building or other restrictions related to the easements, they shall be noted on the final map. 3. Drainage and erosion control plans, prepared by a registered civil engineer, shall be submitted for review and approval by the Commu- nity Development Department prior to issuance of building permits in conjunction with installation of driveways, access easements or structures. This shall appear as a Note on the final map. 4. Plan and profile drawings of proposed individual driveways and driveway easements shall be submitted for approval by the Communi- ty Development and Public Works Departments in order to determine average grade and appropriate improvement requirements. This shall appear as a note on the final map. 5. Obtain an encroachment permit from the Public Works Department and construct improvements4as directed by the encroachment permit prior to recording the final map. bdika 1�e�- - 6. An offer for dedication to the Public for a Public Utilities Ease- ment shall be made for the six foot P.U.E. adjacent to the right- of-way along the entire property frontage. Offers of dedication shall be completed and recorded prior to or simultaneously to recording the final map. 7. All conditions herein specified shall be complied with prior to filing of the final map. 8. A final map drawn in substantial conformance with the approved tentative map and in compliance with all conditions set forth herein shall be submitted for review and approval in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City Lot Division Ordinance prior to recordation. a. Monuments shall be set at all new property corners created and a registered civil engineer or licensed land surveyor shall indicate, by certificate on the final map, that corners have been set or shall be set by a date specific and that they will be sufficient to enable the survey to be retraced. 5 Tentative Parcel Map 23-86 (Golden West/Volbrecht Surveys) b. A recently updated preliminary title report shall be submit- ted for review in conjunction with the processing of the final map. 9. Approval of this tentative parcel map shall expire two years from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted pursuant to a written request prior to the expiration date. 6 34 /, ` 17 + •o • RS .33 e, 40 • / ` ` / Iib/i �• ,•4 - \Yt y` „s j/ f'� - `.-ww•� ��'\ *�z\�`o � ' LS/CA-T ' D I `I M ft 1P 34 39 34 30 :S/ 33 32..�1 70 JP \/ \1jCN + 4 IS .• \ 1 ,. • , v,:. �/ ■ sir.••N.. 3`tY:f, / 1 .. \. ./!13,e-4/1 J�r +,•r '? 7'7 12 n 11 a t0 �� �' 22 22 .p ' �'•• t:a arr r 14• IOo -V '\ P J , s°w -..{lt /'� • 1� 1" Li ^a~�rr+ ' top. \,mac 11 V.\ •' •' 11 :+ / »•fj \4� q x � `�\ {`y / 4 /'' 1 "4.w g 19 g 1 ,.. • ua I . �:�{4� 5! 10 se%\\\ •w'� \i``O« /, 12 '.• 2C •s.e •fit ee(^ , 7t` ,' =, T, 4% � •rr-• Iat r.a w roa ii+tl t � t•. ` r ' ��1.., � �' �j%,s 19 says 1•i � � `o• h'. ] a.i I.»r I ••~.J tia�\\`\ %s'� \f�w����r:�S o I.eSs 9 Ise 1e�„w pF � re.eta Taos a �,r•a t'• t.• �-AISO t t.. ` \•��/ �� • / r its Rs � nt»t � rsfi:''. ::� ` saw ae• i ? r It 3 21 trr'r ` -t.• .� / '� ,era �� a.w - 'lot p 4 t:t \• w�. i4 -s ♦ 13`},p tl lea• - 1{t 'y- I% nt I 1" 27 m '•L t' - \ .j. • _P ♦4 'e a ISt ,Lo 1{f. � e !'.r L" \ �� N• :.��• I..e. t ee "l 1. 117_ Ila ♦' ..ey sw° � '' »° »' .:..� - �'s, �\ { � ,•~+ f•S \ r r,'t , •er •. n» i 4 $_ Y '� 'M >. - rn � 'e r: if �'. } �►e J o?y 'H.�1.'la ..:,Tr � n r• � T nr n• .\ :`� •6� ••r{e ,iS ,J 1�•t^fb St, nd°t1 , 21�w'1� ,r• w ' It• to It n• ep ! d • - \ iia } r "N '.a J„• / Qt -16 Ball w vt tao lue Q� + wL `� p� m� .. u• ''°. I➢ o a r>r s �ti r r'a, ,rr,�:' Y• rw rr )) ,B •.« jai a 1 Jso .tis.� to eo y I» ne To tot �R Q�;�z Jr•.,rr'•4 \ \I . �'t,Ind •%y �a+y ftpe h to 100 ♦ .. +3/ +' 1 A, 1 A n^ - 1 •� b J 14 D/ „ . 1 4. 102 } •0- L(FH1 / , ,, p PCS ' °IS C.f ITA 7 ^yw y +0 a3 Oa- It � C f z 10 •° ..117., ,.. 17-t_: .., ILCr.%% A+ eH•t / - p +t Maj 0.'`e. V. .3so 20 Lo 4 t0•e "A-tplD AOL COj•o5 �+ w 21 1 22 ,rrRl 18 9 �•,e, . MA - ,� m f ��� _t 3//ecus:+ + ,:-•r ��� •I'" ah .t{,�;.r' _ IV 24 rp 4� 7 rf' I //♦ r 1 ♦arl..T t1 ,,a.� f a to . p � ' / ,: r ��/� /r•tem%, 4,' a { •t •. IX 4 ' ♦r, IS� f! r;,�sy ♦{.e' ,}I" se � �r .t,vrb• / '� r ' I./ q _ �I , a• 113 Gj � H14 21 s �j ,• a „b troy 7 •A 1 % ,` 1 • \ , w 8 @ nnn e's O 6 DATE • M E M O R A N D U M TO: City Manager October 13, 1986 VIA: Michael Shelton, City Manager FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Tentative Parcel Map 25-86 LOCATION: 8375 Portola Road APPLICANT: William Wright (North Coast Engineering) REQUEST: To adjust a lot line between existing parcels and subdiv- ide one parcel into two lots of one acre each. On September 15, 1986 the Planning Commission conducted a public hear- ing on the above-referenced subject, unanimously approving the land division request subject to the findings and conditions contained in • the attached staff report. Bill Wright, applicant, spoke in support of the project and noted his concurrence with the recommendation. No one else appeared on the matter. /Ps cc: William Wright North Coast Engineering • X City of Atascadero Item: B-4 STAFF REPORT . FOR: ((JJPlanning Commission Meeting Date: 9/15/86 BY: Jps teven L. DeCamp, Senior Planner File No: TPM 25-86 Project Address: 8375 Portola Road SUBJECT: Request to adjust a lot line and subdivide a two acre parcel into two lots of one acre each. BACKGROUND: Notice of public hearing was published in the Atascadero News on September 5, 1986. All property owners of record located within 300 feet of the subject property were also notified on that date. A. LOCATION: 8375 Portola Road (Ptn. Lot 10A and 11, Block 6) B. SITUATION AND FACTS: 1. Request. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Adjust lot line between existing • parcels and subdivide one parcel into two lots of one acre each. 2. Applicant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .William and Patricia Wright 3. Representative. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .North Coast Engineering 4. Site Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3. 0 acres 5. Streets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Portola is a paved, City-main- tained street with a 40 foot right-of-way. 6. Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .RSF-Y (Residential Single Family with a one acre minimum lot size where sewers are available) 7. Existing Use. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Each existing lot contains a single family dwelling. 8. Adjacent Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . .North: RSF-Y South: RSF-Y East: RSF-Y West: RSF-Y • Tentative Parcel Map15-86 (Wright/North Coast E•ineerin g g) 9. General Plan Designation. . . . .Moderate Density Single Family 10. Terrain. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .SteeP to gradual slopes at the • g P front and rear of the site. 11. Environmental Status. . . . . . . . .Negative Declaration prepared and posted August 21, 1986 C. ANALYSIS: The property proposed for subdivision is located in the RSF-Y zone. The minimum lot size in this zone is one acre when sewers are available and 1.5 acres when sewers are not available. Be- cause sanitary sewers are available to the subject property, the one acre minimum lot size is applicable. Existing development on the subject property consists of two sin- gle family dwellings: one on each of the two existing lots. The proposal before the Commission will result in an adjustment of the line between the two existing dwellings and the creation of one new lot which will have frontage on Portola Road. Each of the resulting lots will be one acre in area. As proposed, Parcel B would be a land-locked parcel because no means of ingress/egress is provided to that parcel. This problem can be resolved, however, through establishment of a easement over that portion of Parcel A which extends south to Portola Road. Approval of the tentative map will be conditioned, in part, on establishment of adequate legal access for Parcel B. Other than the access question noted above, the proposed parcel map does not present any significant planning issues. The type and density of development proposed is consistent with existing neighborhood character. The lot sizes proposed are appropriate given the availability of sanitary sewer service. Finally, the map is in conformance with the adopted City General Plan and Zon- ing Ordinance. D. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends conditional approval of Tentative Parcel Map 25-86 based on the Findings in Exhibit A and the Conditions in Exhibit B. SLD:ps ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A - Findings for Approval Exhibit B - Conditions of Approval Exhibit C - Location and Zoning Map Exhibit D - Tentative Parcel Map 2 • Tentative Parcel Map 5-86 (Wright/North Coast Engineering) EXHIBIT A - Tentative Parcel Map 25-86 Findings for Approval 0 September 15, 1986 FINDINGS: 1. The creation of these parcels conforms to the Zoning Ordinance and the General Plan. 2. The creation of these parcels, in conformance with the recommended conditions of approval, will not have a significant adverse effect upon the environment. The Negative Declaration prepared for the project is adequate. 3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development that is proposed. 4. The site is physically suitable for the density of development that is proposed. 5. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish and wildlife or their habitat. 6. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvement will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision; or that substantially equivalent alternate easements are provided. 7. The proposed subdivision complies with Section 66474.6 of the State Subdivision Map Act as to methods of handling and discharge of waste. 3 Tentative Parcel Map 25-56 (Wright/North Coast Engineering) EXHIBIT B - Tentative Parcel Map 25-86 Conditions of Approval September 15, 1986 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. Water shall be obtained from the Atascadero Mutual Water Company and water lines shall exist at the frontage of each parcel or its public utility easement prior to recordation of the final map. 2. All existing and proposed utility easements, pipelines and other easements are to be shown on the final map. If there are other building or other restrictions related to the easements, they shall be noted on the final map. 3. Grading, drainage, and erosion control plans, prepared by a regis- tered civil engineer , shall be submitted for review and approval by the Community Development and Public Works Departments prior to issuance of building permits in conjunction with installation of driveways, access easements or structures. This shall appear as a note on the final map. 4. Obtain encroachment permit(s) from the Public Works Department and construct improvements as directed by the encroachment permit (s) prior to recording the final map. 5. Plan and profile drawings of proposed individual driveways and driveway easements shall be submitted for approval by the Communi— ty Development and Public Works Departments in order to determine average grade and appropriate improvement requirements. 7. The applicant shall offer to dedicate to the City of Atascadero the following right-of-way along the entire frontage of the sub- ject property along Portola Road. a. Street Name: Portola Road b. Limits: Ten feet along the southerly property line adjacent to the northerly right-of-way line of Portola Road. C. Minimum Width: Thirty feet from centerline 8. The applicant shall offer for dedication to the public a Public Utilities Easement six feet in width along the property frontage adjacent to the right-of-way of Portola Road. 9. Offers of dedication shall be completed and recorded prior to or simultaneously with recording the final map. 10. Adequate legal access to proposed Parcel B shall be provided via an easement on Parcel A from Portola Road to a point sufficient to allow ingress/egress to Parcel B. 4 Tentative Parcel Map 25-86 (Wright/North Coast Engineering) 11. Each of the subject parcels shall be a minimum of one acre (prior to any offer of dedication) and shall be thus indicated on the final map. 12. A final map drawn in substantial conformance with the approved tentative map and in compliance with all conditions set forth herein shall be submitted for review and approval in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City Lot Division Ordinance prior to recordation. a. Monuments shall be set at all new property corners created and a registered civil engineer or licensed land surveyor shall indicate, by certificate on the final map, that corners have been set or shall be set by a date specific and that they will be sufficient to enable the survey to be retraced. b. A recently updated preliminary title report shall be submit- ted for review in conjunction with the processing of the final map. 13. Approval of this tentative parcel map shall expire two years from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted pursuant to a written request prior to the expiration date. 5 f r t BST G r t� FB T I. LOCA 01.1 E Zo�l►►J4 RMF/96 .9 ,• �,h s ;�% p//� lo-a�a:-•rr F/V l �S S W •s tart aA .��� \,/aJ1' ' '•� Nh,,.�•..i•, ;x S. • RMF/7 6 `� ^�a'� ;• �� a •.i` ,+ �� -�, s rr { �o`• '.! ,1v1 \� a y�,•♦`.ys � .��IG +' ,�� ° ,*•• 1t4. c �TC .L'LY , C7 A � 1./ rr �� -i w �'� ...- <i •a° 1• �r1:.� 4iO '�i•....ta.,. js�./r •o. :' s '.;+ \`', �,•,'".�, ' , „r•♦ '• � �-:LS(C—Y <yr •�s (S• • a .n'.• '•tw - .•�� s L� , ♦° . h�°', •.�i =., n `u ' 1 , � '•� ,�t a aSk ♦ 'per' �.e 1_ •,15'�t:•%; i' y+i •'a BBQ •'��,'• �.•- a - �,> � j. ;� ,r ,, ' ,J el^ u S t> d ' ,• 4'!1 ,KJ' ♦• Lam... .,.,. 1P'•- � - y ., a .sva °°.`:C� '3:� s• Ste' •:�� y;vat •-(' a� �' . • V r ]. s��) • ,.�1/_ Fat Np N t� • L'1 } ,a ' ,' t) �, '� b• +s4,4� - ���ao rrs�al � a ?° 'f}SN i •o • 5 0 • '�, '� > ti s . ,� !>..,• a °• d,�so la S ,s•• a• '\�Sa t �. - ,� .,�+,.'ry - N'+ Orr a 'i a• 'fro „ • )ujf; .,ot /' '.?`'``?: [■�A(■� - •�i•� )•: rO ' / 'O 115° ♦��e � I#„ ,' ... �V FL'i� [ ! (l).• 'J,` )e /! [• ♦,15 1I1. , (/: f° 1 - t0 { a• J ` �' S ro )a,�?O c ,iso H »ss t'°D Y• ` "' '�'oa �- a• a - . -_. - /� J/ ,l�f w, i0 i,+ 19 ; I<5 - •• d � Las , J to . LSE-Y �" _ ,�`< . 1,5• Le/ 4.r,° " wY 4 '1qqq,,, >s:. U » ,•o r =1's•4 as r` •;.wp - < b � IQ) • , n.,r .t.,Vis^ ros 'U; Stnr .•,r • ,n. �:-L _ - �� 1, - •)V ,,� >4�• tra Tfb '•)ib. ,f)j2 tO , a • - � ,.rY.� ,_�, � 5 t•m fat �, +� R-`� "yi; �°` �' Srrr yv- 'f c >ae -t•. '�y s.=a.; \ CAUP03) r•/` ;r� ``° . '�v `.f t. LSF-Y(FH) ti� T'f- •r„ •}; �•. '��p3 •� >.,> it+ 135• �:;"!�. .. � �e'1;': .,. �'^' rr ir. 'r, -a• rss >,a• ♦^ "+ }Tnp, i a '�'< '• - •'_ - • ;=a_ r y)••_• « ''» law ,. *. � :.:'-;:�..- �; ::-''•' LSF-Y(FH) • at 30 1 t .a- •1Y s, eta 1+NJ �°� 19 LSF-Y -� . ',as• r a - -cam 16 1!-A:'oc� 3. rt u a a4• Y A ts.e •" • ,r• n ;° °•• a " �g !y faa Kk ISa � 20 - .kid+' _�fr �, '„ .r•• N ',••a .'• I• If i•.f ` baa la•C . C, er , h�.•�' s.. S�'J. ' � hi) ' b e,n , � n- Gcl 4>�e'•'' � - :4, � UMhb � -• F—Y(FH) • � R�-♦hs yA♦ Ya 1 9 c - • 4,t ", �r ' 4tr, t.:..�� ! .+ `tr . _ - 20 cy , ,. ° , •'. : t ! c •' d?°S •X19 . 1 LtA It •RMF/16(FH) p'it'y"' •r">r 12° 31 22 '-.-.•... a• •. aC 'S 1 I C • f r ; D TEN-r. PA2 moi-- MAC TPM 25-off V � 7-) Ir V tt URIM � a 1 � N N _ V o w ' O V ar y - � R Otit 2°a�O `� eaA nZ A rp -- Ol� a a 41 4z, �2qo s m ti tim n O m mng i • t G 10/13/86AG�"'A DATE M E M O R A N D U M TO: City Manager October 13, 1986 VIA: Michael Shelton, City Manager 0 FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director W SUBJECT: Tentative Parcel Map 15-84 (time extension) LOCATION: 1875 El Camino Real APPLICANT: HLS Properties Ltd. (Associated Professions Inc. ) REQUEST: To extend the time allowed to complete conditions of the tentative map. On September 15, 1986 the Atascadero Planning Commission considered the above-referenced subject on its consent calendar, unanimously approving a time extension to September 10 , 1987 , subject to the find- ings and conditions set forth at the time the project was originally approved (see attached staff report) . There was no discussion on the matter and no one appeared. /p s cc: HLS Properties Ltd. Associated Professions Inc. City of Atascadero Item:—A-2 STAFF REPORT . FOR: Planning Commission Meeting Date: 9/15/86 PPS BY: teven L. DeCamp, Senior Planner File No: TPM 15-84 Project Address: 1875 El Camino Real SUBJECT: To allow a time extension in order to give the applicant additional time to comply with the conditions of the tentative map. BACKGROUND: On September 10, 1984, the City Council approved the subdivision of a 6.5 acre parcel into two parcels of 2.64 and 3.45 acres. A zone change and General Plan amendment was approved in 1985 providing for commercial (CN) zoning on the new parcel fronting on E1 Camino Real. The conditions of the tentative map are nearly complete, but time has run out on the tentative approval. A. LOCATION: 1875 E1 Camino Real (Lot 31, Block 49) B. SITUATION AND FACTS: S 1. Request. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .To extend the time allowed to complete conditions of the ten- tative map. 2. Applicant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .HLS Properties Ltd. 3. Representative. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Associated Professions Inc. 4. Site Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6.5 acres 5. Streets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .El Camino Real and Obispo Road are both paved, City-maintained roads. 6. Zoning. . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .RS (Parcel A) ; CN (Parcel B) 7. Existing Use. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Vacant 8. Adjacent Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . .North: RS South: CN East: RS West: CN • Tentative Parcel Map 15-84 (HLS Prop./AssociatedRrofessions) 9. General Plan Designation. . . . .Retail Commercial 10. Terrain. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Level to gently sloping 11. Environmental Status. . . . . . . . .Negative Declaration previously recorded C. ANALYSIS: The minimum lot size in the RS zone is 2.5 to 10.0 acres. In the area subject to this subdivision, the minimum lot size was ad- justed to 2.5 acres for Parcel A. Parcel B, the commercial lot., also has a 2.5 acre minimum lot size due to its location outside the Urban Services Line. The tentative map approval required substantial road improvements which the applicant has only recently completed. There have been no changes in the General Plan or Zoning Ordinance which affect this approval. Finally, there have been no changes in the charac- ter of the site or surrounding areas which would affect the ap- proval of this map. D. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the time extension request based on the Findings in Exhibit A and the conditions set forth at the time the project was originally approved. Approval of this one year time extension shall expire on September 10 , 1987 . SLD:ps ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A - Findings for Approval Exhibit B - Staff report dated September 4 , 1984 2 Tentative Parcel Map15-$4 (HLS Prop./Associated Professions) EXHIBIT A - Tentative Parcel Map 15-84 Findings for Approval September 15, 1986 FINDINGS: 1. There have been no changes to the provisions of the General Plan or Zoning Ordinance applicable to the project since the approval of the entitlement. 2. There have been no changes in the character of the site or its surroundings which affect how the standards of the General Plan or Zoning Ordinance apply to the project. 3 STAFF REPORT Planning Commission - City of Atascadero Date: September 4 , 1984 Item: B-5 (Tentative Parcel Map 15-84 Notice of Public Hearing was pub- Public Hearing Case: TPM 15-84 lished in the Atascadero News on Public Hearing to create one August 24 , 1984 , and all owners of residential lot on Obispo Road record property located within 300 and one future commercial lot feet were notified by United States on El Camino Real. mail on that same date. A. Location: 1875 •.E1 Camino Real (Lot 31, Block 49) B. Situation and Facts: 1. Request. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .To create two lots, one with frontage on .Obispo Rd. and one with frontage on El Camino. 2. Applicant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .HLS Properties Ltd 3. Engineer. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Associated Professions Inc. 4. Site Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.5 acres 5. Streets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .El Camino Real is a major - arterial with a right-of-way width of 100 feet. Obispo Road is a local street with a 60 foot right-of-way. 6. Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .RS (Residential Suburban) 7. Existing Use. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Vacant 8. Adjacent Zoning & Use. . . . . . . . . . .North: RS, S.F.R. South: CN, Commercial East: RS, S.F.R. West: CN, Commercial 9. General Plan Designation. . . . . . . .Suburban Single Family Resi- dential 10. Terrain. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Level to gently sloping 11. Environmental Status. . . . . . . . . . . .Categorically Exempt W STAFF REPORT - Tentative Parcel Map 15-84 - (HLS Properties Ltd./ Associated Professions) C. Site and Development Data: 1. Site Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6. 5 Acres 2. Required minimum lot size: Lot Size Factor Average slope (0-100) .50 Distance from center . 30 Septic suitability (moderate) 1. 00 Road (City accepted) .40 General neighborhood character .45 MINIMUM LOT SIZE 2. 65 acres 3. Minimum lot size reduced by 20% : 2.12 (minimum lot size in RS zone is 2. 5 acre: 4. Proposed lot sizes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Parcel A: 2.5 acres Parcel B: 3. 59 acres 5. Access. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .El Camino Real and Obispo Road 6. Shaped. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Rectangularly shaped D. Analysis: Both proposed lots are above the minimum lot size requirements, with a slight reduction applied to Parcel A. The Atascadero Mutual Water Company hds issued a "will serve" letter for this property and the generally level nature of the slopes presents no problem for building or sewage disposal. The proposed size of Parcel A is below the required minimum lot size. By enlarging Parcel A to 2. 65 acres the applicant can meet the lot size performance standards. Parcel B would then become 3.44 acres. Staff review notes that two previous subdivisions occured on Obispo Road in 1981. The major concern then, as it is now, is the con- dition of Obispo Road. In 1981 road improvements were required along the Obispo frontage of the properties. The same condition holds true today. E. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of Tentative Parcel Map 15-84 to create two residential lots, one with frontage on Obispo Road and one with frontage on E1 Camino Real, based on the Findings that follow and the conditions contained in Exhibit "A" . -2- STAFF REPORT - Tentative Parcel Map 15-84 - (HLS Properties Ltd./ Associated Professions) F. Findings: 1. The creation of these two lots conforms to all applicable zoning and-'subdivision regulations. 2. The creation of two lots in conformance with the recommended conditions of approval will not have a significant adverse effect upon the environment and preparation of an Environ- mental Impact Report is not necessary. -3- EXHIBIT "A" - TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 15-84 Conditions of Approval September 4 , 1984 1. Private sewage disposal systems will be an acceptable method of sewage disposal if reports and designs are acceptable. All tests, reports and designs shall conform to methods and guidelines pre- scribed by the.-fAanual of Septic Tank Practices and other appli- cable City Ordinances. The following Note shall appear on the Final Map: "Appropriate soils reports including a percolation - test, a test to determine the presence of ground water, and a log of a soil bor- ing to a minimum depth of ten (10) feet. shall be submitted to the Planning Department prior to the issuance of a building permit. Where soils reports indicate the conventional soil absorption sys- tems are not acceptable, City approval of plans for an alternative private sewage disposal system, designed by a Registered Civil Engineer, shall be required. Depending upon the system, more re- strictive requirements may be imposed. " 2. Water shall be obtained from the Atascadero Mutual Water Company and water lines shall exist at the frontage of each parcel or its public utility easement prior to recordation of the Final Map. 3. All existing and proposed utility easements, pipelines and other . easements are to be shown on the Final Map. If there are other building or other restrictions related to the easements, they shall be noted on the Final Map. 4 . Grading that would be disruptive to the natural topography shall be minimized. Removal of existing, mature trees shall also be minimized. The following shall appear as a Note on the Final Map: "No trees shall be removed without compliance with applicable City ordinances. No grading shall commence without an appropri- ate permit and compliance with applicable City ordinances. " 5. Drainage and erosion control plans, prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer, shall be submitted for review and approval by the Plan- ning Department prior to issuance of building permits in conjunc- tion with installation of driveways, access easements or structures. This shall appear as a Note on the Final Map. 6. Plan and _profile drawings of proposed individual driveways and driveway easements shall be submitted for approval by the Planning and Public Works Departments in order to determine average grade and appropriate improvement requirements. This shall appear as a Note on the Final Map. 7 . A rural local road section shall be constructed along the Obispo road frontage. Road improvement plans designed by a registered Civil Engineer shall be submitted to the Public Works Department. 0, • EXHIBIT "A" - TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 15-84 8. The fire hydrant at Del Rio Road and Obispo Road shall be up- graded to City standards, if there is to be access to Parcel A from Obispo Road and/or Parcel A will bean Obispo Road address. 9. All conditions .herein specified shall be complied with prior to filing of the Final Map. 10. A Final Map drawn in substantial conformance with the approved tentative map and in compliance with all conditions set forth herein shall be submitted for review and approval in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City Lot Division Ordinance prior to recordation. a. Monuments shall be set at all new property corners created and a Registered Civil Engineer or licensed land surveyor shall indicate by Certificate on the Final Map that corners have been set or will be set by a date specific and that they will be sufficient to enable the survey to be retraced. b. A recently updated preliminary title report shall be submit- ted for review in conjunction with the processing of the Final Map. 11. Approval of this Tentative Parcel Map shall expire two years from the date of Planning Commission approval unless an extension of time is granted pursuant to a written request prior to the expira- tion date. -2- 4 • X17 20 10 RMFI P \ � C rs, \ " Lot .22 .• t S 49 3yo 1325 - !0 33 sgo �obi: 2 ;-; • 20 ► �, .T 33 28 a / 29 46 30 100 �a\01 x / , q - x I ` ON ` 3 !c»/off 1•� y �1 !� a tion 12 r y 14 Z9 c. co c !� ��."t � 0 050 pti a pa�. Lp 2 IX 00 'P •Mo •qa C A ins ,• D('1 Y� N N �Y '� ,a zr � � ¢ -_= alis O-• �II CY ' O # a. x rn N ` all O ah3m a� a �a 2 HCl r a n a r Cil NOD o a�OWO \l ` O a A N�� n 2 CARR/Z� Ro 2 4 ,: 02r 2m m oa V c c 4° 1\ a o L IF ".•� • µEOG AGENDA DATE 10/13/861Trrm M E M O R A N D U M TO: City Council October 13, 1986 VIA: Michael Shelton, City Manager FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director .} SUBJECT: Tentative Parcel Map AT 830325:1 (time extension) APPLICANT: Charles Dovica (Central Coast Engineering) REQUEST: To extend the time allowed to complete conditions of the tentative map. On September 15, 1986 , the Atascadero Planning Commission considered the above-referenced request on its consent calendar, unanimously approving a time extension to September 27, 1987. There was brief discussion concerning Condition #16 relative to the applicant being required to pay for a portion of the reconstruction of Balboa Road, and how those costs compare to 1986 costs. No one appeared on the matter. /ps cc: Charles Dovica Central Coast Engineering • s � City of Atascadero Item: A-1 STAFF REPORT FOR: Planning Commission Meeting Date: 9/15/86 BY: p D.Doug Davidson, Assistant Planner File Not AT 820325:1 Project Address: Ardilla and Balboa Roads SUBJECT: To allow a time extension to give the applicant additional time to comply with the conditions of the tentative map. This tentative tract map approved the subdivision of 27.5 acres into eleven lots of 2.5 acres each. BACKGROUND: Tentative Tract Map AT 820325:1 was approved by the City Council on September 27, 1982, subject to eighteen (18) conditions of approval. These included the improvement of Ardilla Road along the entire prop- erty frontage as well as participating in the Capital Improvement Program for improvement of Balboa Road. A one year time extension was granted in September, 1984. A second time extention was granted by the City Council on October 28, 1985. A letter requesting a third time extension was received by staff on August 25, 1986 . A. LOCATION: Ardilla and Balboa Roads (Lots 14,15,16,17,33, of Block 24) B. SITUATION AND FACTS: 1. Request. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .To extend the time allowed to complete conditions of the ten- tative map. 2. Applicant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Charles Dovica 3. Engineer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Central Coast Engineering 4. Site Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .27. 5 acres 5. Streets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Ardilla, Balboa, and Graves Creek Roads are City-maintained streets. 6. Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .RS (Residential Suburban) 7. Existing Use. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Vacant 8. Adjacent Zoning and Use. . . . . .North: RS, residential South: RS, residential East: RS, residential Re: AT 820325:1 (Time Extension) - Dovica West: RS, vacant 9. General Plan Designation. . . . .Suburban Residential 10. Terrain. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .The property slopes slightly with vegetation consisting of grasses and several oak trees. There is a drainage Swale along proposed Parcels 4, 5, and 11. 11. Environmental Status. . . . . . . . .A Negative Declaration was filed - with the County Recorder on October 4, 1982. C. ANALYSIS: This tentative map approval involves substantial engineering and road improvements as conditions of approval. The applicant and his engineer are continuing to pursue the completion of these con- ditions. Under the Subdivision Map Act, tentative maps may be ex- tended for an additional three years, thus not to exceed a total of five years. The primary issue involved in considering this request is that the 1983 Zoning Ordinance which passed after the original approval would require lots larger than 2. 5 acres. However, current State legislation supports time extensions as a vested right notwith- standing changes in local land use regulations. This was- the . reasoning used in the two prior extensions and staff believes the project merits another extension. This third extension brings the life of this map to five years. Therefore, a final map must be filed and recorded during the com- ing year as no more time extensions will be allowed. Finally, this tentative map is shown as including ownership of the lots to the centerline of the road. There is some question, how- ever, as to the property ownership of the roads and a title search is now being conducted to clarify it. _ Staff' s main concern is to ensure that the acreage of each of these lots remains at least 2. 5 acres. Two and one-half acres was the 1982 minimum lot size standard under the Zoning Ordinance and is the smallest lot allowed under the General Plan in this area. Also, a lot line adjustment is required because Ardilla Road as it exists falls outside the record right-of-way. These items need to be taken care of within the next year. Staff has no problem with allowing this map to continue so these items can be worked out. 2 Re: AT 820325:1 (Time Extension) - Dovica D. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the time extension to September 27, 1987 based upon the original conditions of approval. DGD:ps ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A - Letter requesting time extension Exhibit B - Staff report dated September 7, 1982 with conditions of approval 3 RECEIVEV CENTRAL COAST AUG 251986 -ENGINEERING _ 396 Buckley)toad COMMUNITY-DEVELOPMENT Sari Luis Obispo _ August 25x'1986 - E1439 California 93401 - City of" Atascadero Planning-Department - P.O.. Box 747 Atascadero, CA 93423 - Dear Sirs Since we.- are Engineer of -Record on the Tract Map o-f Tract 1057 which ft- - bordered- ,by _Gr"aves Creek Road, Balboa, and Ardi11a Roads, we feel- that it is necessary to file fora final extension for thefo119wing reasons - 'K Ardilla-Road as it exists .falls outside the record right'=of_way _ _ ._ r 2. The existingutilities `(water , tel"ephone ' and. :p`ow�ra- are al so built to tfie existing road alignment, _ - -:3_. A- recent i nvest i ag.at i o n as to the ownersh=ip of .the roads has_---, revealed _that the Tentative__Tract- Map is probably--incorrect- by showing ownership to the centerline of the road .--,- Thi-s".i s: due to -�' the inherent_ problems of the Atascadero Colony Holding- Company Deeds. Therefore, -a title search is presently bet ng _conducted as- ' to the true ownership of the roads. These results- are necessary prior--to finalizing the map. `~ An extension wi 11 enable the Engineer the time to "prepare 'and file a lot 1 in-e- adjustment and determine proper ownersfii p prior to fi 1 i ng -a .final`_map. . Sincerely, _ - B-rad Bechwald EXH-1HFT' f - - Staff Engineer- _ �_ .:_LF_T_T�.R :_ Telephone(805)544-3278 ft 1918 G F ',nn HI 1979 ; G / CITY OF ATASCADERO \ CAD �� PLANNNG DEPARTMENT September 7, 1982 STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: Tentative Tract Map AT 820325:1 LOCATION: Ardilla and Balboa Roads (Lots 14,15,16„17,33 Block 24) APPLICANT: Charles Dovica (Western Engineering) REQUEST: To divide 27. 5 acres into 11 parcels of 2. 5 acres each BACKGROUND 1. Existing Zoning: A-1-2 1/2 2. General Plan: Suburban Single Family Residential 3. Environmental Determination: An initial study environmental de- scription form has been completed. The Planning Director has pre- pared a Conditional Negative Declaration indicating the project le will not have a significant adverse effect upon the environment if certain mitigation measures are incorporated into the project. 4. Site Conditions: The 27. 5 acre site is located at the northeast corner of Ardilla and Balboa Roads, with one parcel adjacent to Graves Creek Road. The property slopes slightly, with the high end being at Ardilla Road and the low end at Graves Creek Road. There is a significant drainage swale along Balboa Road across proposed Parcels 4, 5 and 11. There is currently no development on the site with the exception of a concrete slab on Parcel 9 which is to be removed. Vegetation consists of grasses, with a couple of mature oaks on the corner of Parcel 11 near the swale and brush along Balboa Road. 5. Project Description: The applicant proposes to divide five ex- isting lots totalling 27. 5 acres into 11 Parcels of 2. 5 acres each. Access to Parcels 7,8,9 ,10 and 11 will be from Ardilla Road, to 3,4 ,5 and 6 from Balboa Road, and to 1 and 2 from Graves Creek Road. Several of the parcels (2 and 7) are flag lots while several others (3 and 6) would be served by. a common private ease- ment. Utilities are available to the site. The project will in- clude extension of utility lines; grading of an easement from Balboa Roads to serve Parcels 3 ,4 ,5 and 6; road improvements on Ardilla Road; and drainage improvements on Graves Creek Road. STAFF COMMENTS On May 6, 1982 the Subdivision Review Board met with Mr . Dovica and his engineer , Mr. Biathrow. The following items of concern were dis- cussed: F�jV Tentative Tract Map AT 820325: 1 (Dovica) 1. Number of flag lots, potential for a dedicated or private cul-de- sac. 2. Existing foundations and piping needed to be shown on the map, and removal would be a condition of the map. 3. Fire hydrants will be needed spaced 800 feet apart. 4. Potential septic problems due to standing water . 5. Lot 9 (original design) had a questionable building site. 6. Potential name change for Ardilla Road. 7. Traffic safety problem with access to Parcels on Balboa Road. S. Water drainage problems on Graves Creek Road. 9. Road improvements on Ardilla Road. 10. Pay-back for Balboa Road improvements. 11. Comments received. After discussion of these items, it was felt certain revisions to the proposed map were in order. On July 8, 1982 the Subdivision Review Board met again with Mr . Dovica and Mr . Biathrow. Also present at that meeting were: Joel Moses, Associate Planner; Mike Hicks, Fire Chief; Patience West, Engineering Aide; Jill Kollmann and Kami Griffin, Planning Interns; and Bill Carroll, Planning Commissioner . The discussion centered around selec- tion of the best cul-de-sac alternative. Of primary concern was access to Parcels 3, 4, 5, and 6 from Balboa Road, due to limited sight distance along Balboa. A single easement to serve the four par- cels was agreed upon as being the best alternative. FINDINGS 1. The proposed Tentative Tract Map will not have a significant ad- verse effect upon the environment and the preparation of an En- vironmental Impact Report is not necessary. 2. The proposed Tentative Tract Map conforms to ail applicable zoning and subdivision regulations and is consistent with the 1980 Atas- cadero General Plan. Tentative Tract Map AT 820325: 1 (Dovica) RECOMMENDATION Based upon the above Findings, the Planning Department recommends: A) Issuance of a Conditional Negative Declaration as follows: 1. Adequate provisions shall be made for drainage and erosion control and protection in conjunction with site development. 2. Provision shall be made to minimize grading and tree removal. 3. Provision shall be macre to minimize fire hazards created by resulting development. 4. Adequate provision shall be made for septic suitability; and, B) Approval of Tentative Tract Map AT 820325: 1 subject to the follow- ing conditions: Private sewage disposal systems will be an acceptable method of sewage disposal if reports , tests, and design are accept- able. All tests, reports and designs shall conform to meth- ods and guidelines prescribed by the Manual of Septic Tank Practice and other applicable City ordinances. The following shall appear as a Note on the Final Map: "Appropriate soils reports including a percolation test, a test to determine the presence of ground water , and a log of a soil boring to a minimum depth of ten (10) feet shall be submitted to the Atascadero Planning Department prior to the issuance of a building permit on each lot. Where soils re- ports indicate that conventional soil absorption systems are not acceptable, City approval of plans for an alternative private sewage disposal system, designed by a Registered Civil Engineer , shall be required. Depending upon the sys- tem, more restrictive requirements may be imposed." 2. Water ' shall be obtained from the Atascadero Mutual Water Company and water lines shall exist at the frontage of all parcels prior to filing of the Final Map. 3. Other utilities available to the area not already in place shall be extended underground to the front of each parcel prior to recordation of the Final Map. Any utility easements are to be shown on the Final Map. Drainage and erosion control plans , prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer , shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning and Public .Works Departments prior to issuance of building permits in conjunction with the installation of private driveways. A Note to this effect shall be placed on the Final Map. Y 4r Tentative Tract Map AT 820325: 1 (Dovica) Plan and profile drawings of proposed individual driveways shall be submitted for approval by the Public Works and Planning Departments in order to determine average grade and appropriate improvement requirements at the time of building permits. If average slope exceeds 12%, paved improvement would be a requirement at the time of application for a building permit. Otherwise, an all-weather surface would be required similarly. In no event will driveways be allowed which exceed 20% in slope. Driveways shall be improved to a minimum width of twelve (12) feet with a minimum vertical clearance of fourteen (14) feet. In the event any portion of the driveway shall be shared, improvement of that shared portion shall be a requirement made in conjunction with the first building permit. Notes to these effects shall appear on the Final Map. 6. The common access easement serving Parcels 3, 4, 5 and 6 shall be paved with a minimum 2" AC on adequate base prior to recordation of the Final Map. a. The easement may be reduced to 25 , feet in width but shall have adequate width to accommodate 16 feet of paving and any utilities. °l%rS. Parcels 4 and 5 shall take access from the common ease- ment only. 0-A Note shall be provided on the Final Map to indicate that these parcels are prohibited from having individual driveways on Balboa Road. 7. Ardilla Road along the entire property frontage shall be constructed to City standards with a twenty (20) foot paved section (22 feet where drainage control berms are provided) along Ardilla and with three (3) feet of graded shoulder on each side of paving. a. Improvements are to be constructed under an inspection agreement and encroachment permit issued by the Public Works Department. b. Improvement drawings, including improvements to control drainage and erosion within the road right-of-way, shall be submitted to the Public Works Department for review and approval prior to recordation of the Final Map. C. Any dedications necessary along Ardilla shall be made in conjunction with acceptance of the road. 8. The applicant shall upgrade the existing fire hydrant on Ardilla. The size, type and manner of installation of hy- drant will be as required by the Fire Chief. A letter from the • Fire Chief certifying the installation of required fire hydrant shall be submitted to the Planning Department prior to recordation of the Final Map, unless deferred, in which case the letter shall be submitted prior to final inspection and acceptance of the roads. n� Tentative Tract Map AT 820325: 1 (Dovica) a. The applicant shall contribute to a partical reimburse- ment for the hydrant installed on Graves Creek Road in conjunction with Parcel Map AT 80-109. The amount of the reimbursement shall be determined by the Planning Department. 9 . The existing concrete slab located on proposed Parcel 9 shall be removed prior to recordation of the Final Map. 10. A drainage plan to resolve the drainage and ponding problems along the property frontage on Graves Creek Road shall be submitted to the Public Works Department for review and ap- proval and any required improvements shall be installed prior to recordation of the Final Map. a. Improvements are to be constructed under an inspection agreement and encroachment permit issued by the Public Works Department. 021. All drainage swales shall be indicated on the Final Map. iD 12. Effort shall be made to minimize grading that would be dis- ruptive to the natural topography and removal of existing, mature trees. The following shall appear as a Note on the Final Map: "No trees shall be removed without compliance with applicable City ordinances. No grading shall commence without an appro- priate permit and compliance with applicable City ordinances. dfY3. All pipeline and other easements of record shall be shown on the Final Map. A letter shall be submitted from each utility company indicating the nature and extent of any building re- strictions. A Note so stating such restrictions shall appear on the Final Map. X14. Roof materials for all structures shall be Class C rating or better and a Note to that effect shall appear on the Final Map. 15. Improvements required by Conditions 6, 7, 8, and 10 may be deferred for a period not to exceed three years by entering into an agreement. Any such agreement shall include a bond, certificate of deposit or similar improvement guarantee ac- ceptable to the Public Works Department. 16. Prior to recordation of the Final Map, the applicant shall pay for a portion of the City Capital Improvement Program for the reconstruction of Balboa Road; said funding participa- tion to be in the amount of $5,689 . 46. 17. A Final Map in compliance with all conditions set forth here- in shall be submitted for review and approval in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City Lot Division Ordi- nance prior to recordation. .� I'r� Tentative Tract Map AT 820325: 1 (Dovica) Monuments shall be set at all new property corners cre- ated and a Registered Civil Engineer or licensed land surveyor shall submit a letter certifying that the monu- ments have been set prior to recordation of the Final Map. b. A recently updated preliminary title report shall be submitted for review in conjunction with the processing of the Final Parcel Map. 18. Approval of this Tentative Tract Map shall expire two years from the date of this approval unless an extension of time is granted pursuant to a written request prior to the expira- tion date. ACTION The Planning Commission should, by motion direct Staff as deemed appropriate. REPORT PREPARED BY: ILL KOLLMANN Planning Intern REPORT APPROVED BY: � � /I��0 LAWRENCE STEVENS Planning Director /ps 7� it � 16 I G35 4C 51 1�2+ 14 `� 16 A �_ 17 19 A 34 �` 13 •/ T�T_� g �_� Q� t3 92�r Ivy 1 e \�?` `^ -2rid \ 2 22 :-.y _1 j Q 38 34"s ,\ ', 3 22 194 5 2 c R 37 147 OC O / I -/ 25 7271 / \` 4 1 rjr3 1446 15 12/ -�t 8` i /229. 30 , '.� 21 �.1 la 5 / 5 l4 / /31 Z6- I \ W 140/ 136 1�5 - r /+ F 9 8 . 7 / ALL / �. / 2d 139 137- W 2 /33 D i b / / ,Z /I 2• ,- 19 B9 ;2 a ,4 3 7�r 9 :Id// // 7 eg 31 I i {7g 75i' :ac 1 1 ` �. 3 / j -,/ �I� / '!r � 90 87 66 g ;2j r 2.3.A� 8 7 / I 14 l a ?a4 2x31 \� 32b` 334 6/$ / y 1312 / 15 / � �_ 2392 21 ' / 32% e j / 4 3 36 i • I I,'Ip, 9i'92;9,3 /�"32 33 - 9 94 43 h� _ 3S `14�/ ;8 7 16' I ,244 24 y.98 99' 101 IC /28/ , =4/ 1 14,A'� 12 / 6 !Ar t � •314" c V � �•` � / /11 / � / 5 4 � 9T f / / C 3 �� t 1 31 310/31!31 1 1 >��\`� I0 9/8/7A `� %� 1 13 12 i 1 . I 29,/301''1 4 ��; 16 �`, p/5 ��4,V A 1 I 10 30 ^/ 30 4 8 21 / 17\ —�—� t' 3 / 29 4 9 . l 7 32 22 6 j 32 g 20 O G t 2M�28 1 31�^ � 4 / 19 I I 33 .32 31 ?q 17A 178C \ 4-. \ 2G� .�Vl� 23 24 25 35 34 i. �' 119E I 0 A 38 39 ' 1 2613 7 i 40 �� 15 16 17 17c I7 I i d 12 I 41 \ 17 e c 13 1 11 I to 1.9 8 �� I I 8 7 6 ' ' 42 19 —1 I ,� ;r 5 4 43 180 a b 11, I I 1 8 % j �` `� 12 L� , 2 1 14 111 18b 18c 5 I Ila12 33 a 11 /7�N l�✓1` 8 26 , 16 I tic 10 \\ ! ' 33 II 12 5 i G 25 '� � 17 �� I f 3 4 14 -=t 23 24 / / 32 $11 ( 25 16 S ,I 21 1 / �\. �I / 1\ 9 31 a 3zb 23 I i 2° 31 .30 a a 27 �. 19 L9/ <�3i�� 35 21 is 1 28 I �' 20 1284 3�4 19\ 21 28 3 Ig �� / / / / 14//13 II � 10 9 /� �� 22 6 23 4, \6' 17 / I �� 37 2 2d ,r2 /:• � x,25 2 a �'� �a �5 X / 21 22 5 4 6/ l 7 1 l �•2r ` / 6 ( y 4 \yj15 7 /i 23 12 4 25{i 26r ?7 27a�' 28 - / `I\ / a 2 I / I � I , 3 845 14 16 < 3 � -/ 1 ' SITE- LOCATION 7f I / 7 0 / / `\ / Is AT 820325 : I 7 9 �3 18\' l4 13 ! I Arc3;11c> cava Sa.IboQ Vy i l "I\ Lo-Y5 t4, Is, llv, t1�33 L31ockZ4- 1 } i 5 I0 a/ 5A/y/ 19 / IZ / 6 1 10�ld 11 ; 1 I I 10 y i o 3 2 3 12 2 f 1 � /' I 4 1 ,a 1 1 4 _� ` A-1_2 A-1 Q A-1-2/2 A_I-2yL C-1-N W -N A -1 A-1 -4-,_2; a c-2-D 12-4-8-2-0 -I US 101 ¢.-A-C3 D � 1 A-I-2��Z A-I-2�2 R-A-B-D-►•D P A-I_2yZ .d Z� Z 4-3 8` r� � —/-P -✓-3-D i A- -d-v-5 ZoN I tit C AT 82032-9: I Ard,llca and Balboa Lois 14,IS, Ico,1-1,33 Block 2¢ \\ A- 1 -13-v—s • i_ �. �a • '. W ?�s lilt C � x '80 Mt m o a e aa` o_ E,14 i ` :� Csa _� • WOc :iaT� Wi >z I_Z o ax. aaYii W it z M. W� sh aela � V �a l • _ � '� _ atll '•I ll i _ 45 1:t . 11,E gig, - j`'- :•;- � - ' : a � ��1 ._ _ ' 1 - •- i.) _ .. S f:1 i%' ;-' .SIS.,��` I a " tT 11c - Ix -a,ti•r j. cj h� 1`• Mgt %11 •. � � •e.•�---- `�- -__� - L` •--- •, � �� tz yrJt-0i !• q'` _ V �� '•. .°'4• to'W _���` •it 1. S QTS __ �` � ♦ i•. N - hast ��•O .y- 9ae. �`\., _ ---- �� � `A� i '����bOr i ,, � �W- t -- .wtir7 _y–c-- - `'- '` � ice:-'=° %� -�%• �� �/ � .�— r--'_a. - IV VON t INGGENDA 10/13/84TEm A - 17 M E M O R A N D U M TO: City Council October 13, 1986 VIA: Michael Shelton, City Manager -0 FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director - � SUBJECT: Acceptance of Final Parcel Map 33-85 (AT 85-330) LOCATION: 7355 Sombrilla/7350 Encinal APPLICANT: Jay Parsons (Cuesta Engineering) On January 27, 1986 , the City Council approved Parcel Map 33-85, subject to certain conditions and in concurrence with the recom- mendation of the Planning Commission. The required conditions have been complied with and the final map is recommended for approval. HE:ps cc: Jay Parsons Cuesta Engineering ��ti aAaa / 150' f/ 7� r, i E � y f t yy�� a fl .��rn rr, LZ'oz tn�Jt� • Vis ' �D�a 2A:�o W .M"TiNV NDA l-/13/86AGEA _ 18 DATE ITEM • M E M O R A N D U M TO: City Council October 13, 1986 VIA: Michael Shelton, City Manager M'� FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Accepthnce of Final Parcel Map 10-86 (AT 86-050) LOCATION: 10885 San Marcos Road APPLICANT: Tom Hale (Cuesta Engineering) . On June 9, 1986, the City Council approved Parcel Map 10-86, sub- ject to certain conditions and in concurrence with the recommen- dation of the Planning Commission. The required conditions have been complied with and the final map is recommended for approval. HE:ps cc: Tom Hale Cuesta Engineering ,;y trr2� � mr w 1 dor 3 _ NE .gk� ALZ t V1 a J w ti fi T O T G 1 _ / Z --ahs ;_ ,y.• � ' INI�1 .'1���\�; a � ' �l o`.:e�1• `1 4 W k WILL �1N '1=YJ?J�c1 iF`NG710/13/86AGIFINDAA - 19 UP ITEM # M E M O R A N D U M TO: City Council October 13 , 1986 VIA: Michael Shelton, City Manager V"` FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Acceptance of Final Lot Line Adjustment 12-85 LOCATION: 9250 Santa Lucia APPLICANT: Mike Hawkins (Cuesta Engineering) On January 27 , 1986 the City Council approved Lot Line Adjustment 12-85 subject to certain conditions and in concurrence with the recommendation of the Planning Commission. The required condi- tions have been complied with and the final map is recommended for approval. HE:ps cc: Mike Hawkins Cuesta Engineering • i �• Q VC VI > of . 59 70 M lC Ll N lG OM l` $ i o i � a TT Oil 097L/ 7h/l l07 037JV!.O 1 .. .l9Y62 ... .6S ASI __•,J ' • 9r;BS M,A7,Iln JII1 } 1 10/13/86 t �m t# A 20 M E M O R A N D U M TO: City Council October 13, 1986 VIA: Michael Shelton, City Manager At, FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Acceptance of Final Parcel Map 31-85 LOCATION: 10800 Santa Ana Road APPLICANT: Gordon T. Davis (Twin Cities Engineering) • On February 11, 1986 the City Council approved Parcel Map 31-85, subject to certain conditions and in concurrence with the rec- ommendation of the Planning Commission. The required condi- tions have been complied with and the final map is recommended for approval. HE:ps cc: Gordon T. Davis Twin Cities Engineering n u � � M , J- 1 ` YLu . g 2 wO QJ 1-0 a ♦ h° Q� N ° c° � (�Q va t o ���,• h ya vz V � Q lk •� y\E 3 tpo�: ' ,, ; .3 of w h N 4 a h G w 20 0Y6 '7_00.6f.FIN �\ 1 1 II I I I I Lz6ss6 �_ob.°z,�v r � V ..` '•i O 1 13 qb 43 Qq j N �+ V I Q I � C I C (�\ n V CL I 1 m `� m M NG AGENDA D 10/13/86 t7EM A M E M O R A N D U M TO: City Council ,, October 13, 1986 VIA: Michael Shelton, City Manager 6vb FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Acceptance of Final Parcel Map 25-85 LOCATION: 11160 Atascadero Road APPLICANT: Lane and Alexis Curtis (Twin Cities Engineering) • On October 28, 1985 , the City Council approved Parcel Map 25-85, subject to certain conditions and in concurrence with the rec- ommendation of the Planning Commission. The required condi- tions have been complied with and the final map is recommended for approval. HE:ps cc: Lane and Alexis Curtis Twin Cities Engineering �a r :! &s 4z>t °3Lu O r V n C me 3 o�n� k',R cv Lij �`.'� V o1 ��` ..� .,� ►► VIN V� Ln // � sIM�Q' yy M • �ON.� Vm Gln — •- - .V VRJ JnH ' 3 • �,phi �= ~1 %;3 OC , oC.1 /6OtP05.9*zd i s, 10/13/86 A — 22 M E M O R A N D U M TO: City Council October 13 , 1986 VIA: Michael Shelton, City Manager AA FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Acceptance of Final Parcel Map 9-85 LOCATION: 11955 San Marcos Road APPLICANT: Dick Davis (Twin Cities Engineering) • On April 15, 1985, the City Council approved Parcel Map 9-85, subject to certain conditions and in concurrence with the rec- ommendation of the Planning Commission. The required condi- tions have been complied with and the final map is recommended for approval. HE:ps cc: Dick Davis Twin Cities Engineering • • sv ' / � �y.e yV Ql,°1 �° o4Ey '. '�, •i ,vr,10 e°n fli Us m Q O h lei 9 O 4 — O V 1;10 tao�- All — ' • '�Re i I ! S I I 1 o \l.- v 1 IETtN AGTiDA ATE0/13/86 A - 23 ITE To: City Council Through: Mike Shelton From: David G. Jorgensen Date: October 8, 1986 Subject: Agreement to Provide Mandated Cost Claiming Services RECOMMENDATION That the City Council approve an agreement with David M. Griffith and Associates, LTD. , to file state mandated cost claims for fiscal year 1985-86. DISCUSSION The City filed cost claims with the state to recover state mandated costs. These claims must be submitted to the state by November 30, 1986. Currently, the City has no one on staff able to submit timely claims. The fee is a flat $325. 00, for services provided. RECOMMENDED ACTION Council authorize City Manager to enter into agreement. • • r tNv 10/13/8�D'� - 1 M E M O R A N D U M TO: City Council October 13, 1986 VIA: Michael Shelton, City Manager FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director 4W, SUBJECT: Transmittal of recommendations of the ad-hoc Architectural Standards Review Committee to the City Council BACKGROUND: On October 14, 1985, the City Council appointed a five person ad-hoc . committee to make recommendations upon establishment of architectural standards and criteria (see attached staff report dated October 14, 1985) . The Committee comprised of Joe Elkins, Gary Harcourt, Tina Metzger, Harold Hayes, and Frank Henderson has met some 25 times since their first meeting in November , 1985 and attached hereto are their • recommendations. PROBLEM: As indicated in the background materials which led to the creation of the study committee, the City of Atascadero General Plan calls for es- tablishment of a design review committee which has never been estab- lished. The City' s Zoning Regulations contain application submission requirements pertaining to architectural elevations, but there are no criteria against which to judge any application. Concerns about the visual impact of some multi-family projects and certain commercial/in- dustrial projects along the freeway corridor led to a request for evaluation of possibilities for establishing an architectural review process in the City. As noted in the October 14 , 1985 staff report to the Council, the rec- ommendation of the Planning Commission - which was accepted by the Council- was to convene a citizen' s panel to make recommendations on criteria and standards that could be incorporated into the City' s dev- elopment review process. The Council' s action was to not , create an architectural review commission or subcommittee of the Planning Com- mission, but to consider aesthetic review as part of overall project review. ANALYSIS: The Committee met two to four times a month between November , 1985 through August, 1986 to develop their proposed Appearance Review Man- ual (see attachment) which provides criteria for project review and evaluation essentially for non-single family residential developments • • RE: Architectural Standards Review Committee Recommendations within the City. In reaching their conclusions, the committee under- took field trip and follow-up video tape analyses of the major corri- dor view sheds in the City, i.e. , Highway 101, E1 Camino Real, Morro Road, and portions of Traffic Way. They extensively reviewed the City's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance as it pertains to appearance of projects and reviewed design guidelines for a number of other com- munities (refer to reference listing in draft manual) . In addition, they developed, through committee member Tina Metzger , a draft drought tolerant plants list for guidance on future projects in Atascadero (see attached) . As indicated in committee chairman Gary Harcourt' s transmittal letter , the committee, while focusing on appearance criteria and measures necessary to implement the focus of their charge, recognize that there are a number of other concurrent actions that would be desirable to be initiated and implemented by the City to strengthen the visual quali- ties of the community in the future. Staff supports the pursuit of those recommendations but the thrust of this particular report is on the recommendations relative to appearance guidelines. The following are steps that would be necessary to adopt and implement the recommendations of the ad-hoc committee: 1. Initiate zoning amendments - which would mandate a finding of consistency with Council-adopted design appearance guidelines for non-single family projects and larger scale discretionary projects • in single family districts. 2. Adopt the appearance review guidelines by resolution of the City Council at the time of action on the zoning amendment. 3. Amend the General Plan to reflect the foregoing. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Following review and discussion, initiate a zoning amendment and refer the architectural standards review committee report to the Planning Commission for consideration of both the zoning amendment and their recommended criteria in the appearance review manual. HE:ps Enclosure: Committee Chairman' s Letter dated October 8, 1986 Proposed Appearance Review Manual: Guidelines for Quality Development in Atascadero Drought Tolerant Plants for Atascadero October 14, 1985 Staff Report to City Council cc: Architectural Standards Review Committee Members Planning Commission Members 0 f:archrept 2 PA a ' M E M O R A N D U M TO: City Council October 14 , 1985 VIA: Michael Shelton, City Manager FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director430G" RE: Ad-Hoc Committee to Evaluate Architectural Standards and Criteria RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the following committee be appointed to work with staff in evaluating the City's architectural standards and cri- teria for a report back to the City Council: Joe Elkins, architect Gary Harcourt, architect Tina Metzger, landscape architectural student Frank Henderson, architectural designer Harold Hayes, retired (former dean of Cal Poly School of Engin. ) In addition, Bruce Fraser, San Luis Obispo, has offered to respond in writing with respect to his views on existing regulations to provide assistance to the Committee. BACKGROUND: At the City Council' s September 23rd meeting, the Council considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission on establishing an arch- itectural review process within the City. The action of the Council was "acceptance of the Planning Commission' s recommendation and direct staff to come back with a proposed ad-hoc committee of design profes- sionals to evaluate and make recommendations on existing architectural standards and criteria. " The specific recommendation of the Planning Commission . was " . . . . . . . to recommend to the City Council that the guidelines �hich already exist be published for the builders with ad- ditions as --- - ded, and to have the review at the time of specific site review by t Planning Commission, and to change the wording of the General Plan, accordingly. " HE:ps CC : PLANNING COMMISSION v(,q M E M O R A N D U M TO: City Council September 23, 1985 VIA: Michael Shelton, City Manager FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director RE: Planning Commission Recommendation Regarding Architectural Review RECOMMENDATION• Acceptance of the Planning Commission' s recommendation and direct staff to come back with a proposed ad-hoc committee of design profes- sionals to evaluate and make recommendations on existing architectural standards and criteria. BACKGROUND: The City Council, at their June 10 , 1985 meeting, requested a recom- mendation from the Planning Commission on establishing an architec- tural review process within the City. The Planning Commission consid- ered the matter at meetings held July 15, 1985 and August 5, 1985 (see attached minutes excerpts) . PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Action of the Planning Commission was as follows: . . . "to recommend to the City Council that the guidelines which already exist be published for the builders with additions as needed, and to have the review at the time of specific site review by the Planning Commission, and to change the wording of the General Plan accordingly. " With reference to the General Plan amendment, the City' s General Plan calls for the establishment of a design review committee. If it is not the City' s intent to establish such a committee, the language should be deleted from the General Plan. Essentially, she Commission' s action is to recommend that the current architectura '!& standards of the City, with possible revisions, be fol- lowed by the Manning Commission. They rejected the three alterna- tives that were transmitted in the staff report (see attached) includ- ing 1) architectural review commission; 2) architectural review com- mittee; and 3) staff review. With respect to the latter point, the Council, at their meeting of September 9th, requested staff to come back with recommendations on possible zoning text amendments to strengthen precise plan findings and provide for hillside development standards. The Commission' s recommendation proposed that architectural standards be implemented by the Commission on projects before that body, e.g. , conditional use permits and, although not specifically mentioned in their motion, by implication the same would be true of precise plans approvals at staff level. STAFF COMMENT: Much of the Commission's discussion concentrated on the adequacy of existing guidelines and the possibility of strengthening or re-evalu- ating the same to be implemented by the Commission in the course of overall project review. Staff would suggest that consideration be given to establishing an ad-hoc committee comprised primarily of de- sign professionals who would evaluate and make recommendations to the City on the language pertaining to architectural guidelines within the City' s General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. HE:ps Enclosures: Planning Commission Minute Excerpts - July 15, 1985 and August 5, 1985 Planning Commission Staff Reports - July 15, 1985 and August 5, 1985 cc: Planning Commission 2 Minutes - Planning Commission — July 15, 1985 C. NEW BUSINESS: . 1. Council request for recommendation Re: establishing an architectural review process Mr . Engen presented the staff report noting the City Council had referred the matter to the Planning Commission for review and a recommendation. He then proceeded to review the different areas in the City of concern with conflicts with architecture and point- ed out alternatives that are available to the City. Chairman LaPrade felt that before any decision is made, that all commissioners have the opportunity for input into the matter . Commissioner Sanders felt there is a need for an architectural review process because of the number of unsightly buildings that continue to be built within the City. Jerome Schulte, San Gregorio Road resident, stated that the commu- nity is growing and that a close look should be taken as to how the city will look 20 to 30 years from now. He noted his approval of such a review process as it is important to look at the entire picture and stated that the overall appearance of Atascadero is beginning to deteriorate. Mr . Schulte cited a couple of projects recently built that are quite attractive to the community and pointed out that an economic outlook should also be taken with regard to consumers buying in the City or going elsewhere where they feel more comfortable. Elizabeth Putnam, speaking for the homeowners association, read a letter from the association in support of an architectural review process and noted her concern with the way Atascadero is being developed with a mish-mash of architectural styles. Michelle Whitehead, area resident, expressed her concern with the architectural integrity of the community. She stated that even though it is important to have individual expression, it is also important that the individual expression be pleasing to everyone concerned. She expressed her concern that Atascadero is beginning to be identified with low-cost construction and high profit margins and expressed the need to have an architectural review commission composed of various members of the community. Terry Hood, Cascabel resident, spoke in favor of architectural re- view as a regulatory body and that architectural review should be based on principles of design, planning and aesthetics and felt that people in the various fields of architecture, landscaping, etc. would be best qualified to be serve on such a commission. Debra Kankiewicz spoke in support of an architectural review pro- cess and asked for a further explanation on how other communities have dealt with this issue, and expressed some concern about time M factors related to initiating such a process. 6 • • Minutes - Planning Commission - July 15, 1985 Mr. Schulte suggested that before any more projects are approved by the Commission, that a architectural firm be hired as an advisory body. Richard Shannon, 8160 Los Osos, feels the problem lies with the General Plan in that if an area is zoned for commercial or indus- trial buildings, those are the kinds of buildings that will be developed. Del Greenleaf, area resident, spoke about government stepping on the toes of private property owners and felt that an architectural review commission would most definitely improve the looks of com- mercial developments. Terry Hood addressed the government regulations and talked about some of the projects that have been developed by responsible people. Commissioner Michielssen stated that since his appointment to the Commission, he has heard more about the need of forming an archi- tectural review process than any other issue. He noted his support for such a committee. Commissioner Hatchell stated he was in favor of the idea concep- tually and felt that it may be difficult in establishing criteria on which projects will be evaluated. MOTION: Made by Commissioner Hatchell, seconded by Chairman La- Prade to defer any more discussion on the matter until the full commission is present. Commissioner Sanders dissented. Commissioner Sanders feels this motion would be important if the Commission is chosen to serve on the body. Commissioner Kennedy felt more input is needed from the community and noted that an architectural review process is for community involvement. Com- missioner Hatchell asked that if a recommendation was made to appoint an architectural review committee, what would the time frames be? Mr. Engen explained that it may take up to four months for the whole process to be completed. Michelle Whitehead asked if there is a way to let more of the com- munity ". now of these hearings. Mr . Engen suggested that an adver- tisemen~ -ould be placed in the Atascadero News informing of the August „ , meeting date and time. D. PUBLIC COMMENT Jerome Schulte expressed his concern with the high degree of fires starting in this area especially on vacant land that is covered with weeds, and spoke about his efforts for weed abatement on an adjacent piece of property which he felt was endangering his property. Mr. Engen noted that this matter would be before the City Council at the July 22nd meeting concerning weed abatement. 7 i i • Minutes - Planning Commission - August 5, 1985 %M'�'esently to moderate slope" and Parcel 4 should be added as an are used as an orchard. N: Made by Commissioner Michielssen, seconded by Com s- sioner Kennedy and carried unanimously to approve Tenta tive Parcel Map 17-85 subject to the findings an condi ions contained in the staff report with in rporatio 4 o the wording "to prohibit cross lot drain ell within the conditions of approval. Chairman LaPrad and Commissioner Sanders took th it places bac on the Commission 2. Tentative Parce Map 19-85: Request submitte by Sevcik and Thoma to allow the creation of two lots where hree lots now ex ' st in the CR zone. Sub- ject property is loc ted at 3600 E Camino Real, also know as Lot 5 of Block 18. In presenting the staff report Mr Davidson spoke on the previous approvals involved with the deve pment of this site and stated that one of the conditions of use permit was to obtain a to merger. Commissioner Nolan asked i the width the easement would be sufficient and asked w t was involve in the participation of a� traffic light. Mr. Eng n noted that there have been several use,# permit approvals whilGh have involved thes _.. conditions and that study is beinXd ' cussion ed that will address these issues. There was somconcerning the amount `of trees on thesite with regdequate provisions taken to assure protection of the trees. /wit representing the applicant, stated he wasp agree- recommended conditions. by Commissioner Michielssen, seconded by Comtgis- er Bond and carried unanimously to approve Tentative el Map 19-85 subject to the findings and conditi s ained in the staff report. 3. Architectural Review Process: Continued consideration of request by City Council for recommendation on establishing an architectural review process within the City. Mr. Engen provided a brief summary on the discussion and actions taken at the previous meeting concerning this issue, and noted that this is a public hearing item. Maggie Rice, Vida resident, stated she had sought various people' s opinions on an architectural review process and noted that the general consensus was that they were in favor of providing better guidelines in the general plan and zoning ordinance but that most people feared another form of government with rights being taken 3 • 0 Minutes - Planning Commission - August 5, 1985 away. Whitey Thorpe, area resident, stated his opposition to such a pro- cess and felt that the consumer ultimately ends up paying in the end for these types of y controlling agencies and felt that the P g g market place should take care of the architectural situation. Elizabeth Putnam, with the homeowners association, read aloud a letter from the association 'n i support of the review process and repeated many of the same comments expressed at the previous meet- ing. She stated she has talked with many people throughout t the community and felt the general consensus is that an architectural review process is definitely needed. Ms. Putnam also added that what happens in the community does have an affect on individual property values. Norman Norton stated that this should be a discretionary matter and referenced the cities of San Luis Obispo and Paso Robles with their architectural review committees and pointed out various prob-lems that such a committee can present. He noted he is in opposition to this type of review process. Terry Hood, Cascabel Road resident, spoke on behalf of a group of citizens in support of design review and presented the Commission with a petition with 228 signatures and stated that there is com- munity support for an architectural review process. She then referenced the General Plan with regard to criteria contained in the plan for design review. Mrs. Hood summarized comments she had made at the previous meeting. Sandy Overturf, Carmelita resident, stated that it is not only im- portant to keep in mind the architectural considerations, but also to maintain value systems in Atascadero incorporated within the General Plan. Richard Shannon, Los Osos Road resident, stated his opposition to the design review and noted many similarities in some of the in- dustrial and other types of stores in San Luis Obispo with Atas- cadero, and felt that this type of committee becomes a powerful entity. Michelle Whitehead, spoke in support of an architectural review process and felt this would develop accountability as well as dev- elop pleasant surroundings. and noted her support of the archi- tectural review commissions in both San Luis Obispo and Paso Robles. Elaine Oglesby, 9195 Santa Lucia, stated she has been a resident in Atascadero for 48 years and spoke about her experiences with the various advisory committees and general plan committees and the efforts taken to present a concise and complete general plan that was adopted by the community people. Mrs. Oglesby further stated that the provisions of the "Community Appearances and Standards" portion of the General Plan were made in the interest of the community to make it a good place in which to live and that 4 \2 `;' Minutes - Planning Commission August 5, 1985 these provisions should be implemented. Mr. Thorpe suggested that the matter be continued for another two weeks as he would like to have the opportunity of presenting a petition in opposition of the design review to the Commission. Don Eddy, 9705 El Camino Real, felt that the City has good people to look at the overall picture and expressed concern over comments that have been raised relative to the Planning Commission not being qualified to serve on such an architectural review process. Mrs. Hazebrook, 7655 Balboa, noted that the San Luis Obispo Arch- itectural Review Commission is a voluntary body. There are poor buildings in San Luis Obispo that are upgraded when remodeled buildings in the City near Tank Farm Road are better than the County building. Terry Hood clarified some points concerning the petition and the signatures that were taken. John Cole, 8710 Sierra Vista, stated that each issue is contro- versial and that he is opposed to another level of bureaucracy. Michelle Whitehead asked if it was the Planning Department' s role to dictate or regulate the architectural design of commercial building projects. Mr. Engen responded that the process requires submittal of elevations but there is no criteria set in which to change it, etc. Norman Norton commented on a newly constructed store built by Rex Hendrix and the fact that no architectural review was involved and re-iterated that Atascadero has some very good people that are capable of designing and building attractive buildings. Herb LaPrade, 6480 Santa Ynez, expressed his feelings opposing an architectural review process which could diminish the Planning Commission' s role. Terry Hood stated that she hoped that the testimony did not intend to offend contractors and developers and also felt that Mr. Hen- drix' s building was a very attractive one. David Harrell, resident of San Luis Obispo, commented on his feel- ing that San Luis ' s Architectural Review Commission has too much power and cited an example of the different types of sidewalks in front of businesses in the downtown district near the Mission. Commissioner Bond felt that the Architectural Review Commission in San Luis dictates what you can do or what you can' t do; that it causes unnecessary delays for builders and tends to make people want to develop elsewhere because of this agency. He suggested screen planting along the Highway in order to buffer metal build- ings, and felt that guidelines are needed and would like to see le some sort of subcommittee. 5 • Minutes - Planning Commission- August 5, 1985 Commission Nolan inquired as to why El Camino Real and Morro Road were chosen but not Traffic Way. Mr . Engen responded that the request was generated by many people' s complaints concerning the more heavily traveled routes. Commissioner Sanders stated this is the second meeting concerning an architectural review process and does not wish to see this issue continued again. She noted that there is a design review as a part of the General Plan that should be utilized. She further stated that there are many unattractive buildings in Atascadero and that the Planning Commission has a responsibility to the com- munity to assure pleasant surroundings for Atascadero' s future. In response to prior comments concerning improper or poor zoning, Chairman LaPrade referenced the many hearings involved with adop- ting the zoning ordinance and noted that it is impossible to please everyone. He expressed having reservations with an archi- tectural review process and pointed out the problems the Century Plaza has had over the past several years and the fact that it was subject to design review by the County. He further commented that he would support a concept in which prospective applications would be reviewed more closely by staff and the Commission by using the review process already being used with efforts made to make pro- spective developers aware of what will be expected of them in the way of design requirements. Commissioner Michielssen concurred with Chairman LaPrade' s state- ments and suggested published guidelines for development. He stated that the planning commission and city council are elected governmental bodies, therefore, it was his opinion that any design review could be adequately handled by these bodies. He spoke about an individual he knows whose plans have been in the design review process with the San Luis A.R.C. for four months and com- mented on delays experienced with the agency. He further pointed out that the Paso Robles A.R.C. is comprised of planning commis- sion members. Commissioner Michielssen stated he would be in op- position to a strict architectural review commission but would be in favor of the commission handling the work. Commissioner Kennedy felt that guidelines should be written up so that builders will know before they submit a set of plans what will be required of them. She asked how this could be accom- plished. Mr . Engen stated it would be difficult for staff, at this time, to undertake this project in light of the many ongoing projects currently taking place in the Department, but suggested a subcommi"--ee with staff assistance. Commissioner Sanders stated that the criteria is already set forth in the General Plan and felt the issue involved is who should be a part of such a review, and expressed her feeling that concerned people from the community with design experience should be chosen for the design review. 6 w • Minutes - Planning Commission - August 5, 1985 Commissioner Bond agreed that guidelines are definitely needed and hoped that people such as architects, landscapers, etc. would be involved in preparing the guidelines. MOTION: Made by Commissioner Bond to recommend to the Council that a citizens committee of volunteers of builders, architects, landscape architects, to prepare a complete set of guidelines for the Community Development Depart- ment to use, and if deemed necessary, to change the word- ing of the General Plan to coincide with Alternative #3 of the staff report with some variations. Commissioner Nolan seconded the motion. Commissioner Michielssen asked for further clarification on the motion. Commissioner Sanders reiterated that the guidelines al- ready exist in the General Plan. Further discussion ensued con- cerning the nature of the guidelines, the subjectiveness that could result. Commissioner Bond then withdrew his motion and Commissioner Nolan withdrew his second. MOTION: Commissioner Bond moved to recommend to the City Coun- cil that the guidelines which already exist be published for the builders with additions as needed, and to have the review at the time of specific site review by the Planning Commission, and to change the wording of the General Plan accordingly. Chairman LaPrade seconded the motion. There was further discussion concerning cost factors with regard to utilization of staff time needed. The motion carried with Commissioners Kennedy and Sanders dissenting. C. PUBLIC COMMENT Terry Hood expressed her disappointment in the discussion and recommendation that was made to City Council regarding an archi- tectural review process and stated her reasons for the objection. D. VIDIr' ACTION AND/OR DETERMINATION W, 1. Planning ssion Commissioner Nolan expressern with the Colony Inn develop- ment that is currentl er construc ion-with regard to the tree on the site. D ' ssion ensued on this issue vrth,emphasis on in suring ate protection of the trees and the drip n-ne durin g and excavation of new projects. 7 City of Atascadero Item: B-3 STAFF REPORT FOR: Planning Commission Meeting Date: 7/15/85 & 8/5/85 BY: Henry Engen, Planning Director File: Architectural Review Proiect Address: City-Wide BACKGROUND: On June 10, 1985 the City Council considered the attached staff report relative to the subject of establishing an architectural review pro- cess within the city. The action of the Council was to refer the mat- ter to the Planning Commission for review and recommendation. It was the general consensus of the Council that should an architectural re- view function be established in the city, that it be pursuant to alternative #2 (i.e. an architectural review committee established . under the Planning Commission) but that the committee function in an advisory capacity and not a regulatory one. ANALYSIS: Although the city' s general plan calls for the creation of a design review commission, this has not been done. Elevations are required as a pre-requisite for submitting applications for both precise plans and conditional use permit approval, but language is limited with respect to requiring re-designs or modifications to project design. Although staff has no problems with metal buildings per say, there is a strong possibility that the viewshed along El Camino Real will be- come dominated in the years ahead by a lackluster standard plan metal buildings. Clearly, the major negative on architectural review is adding to the the time it takes to obtain a permit and additional time that staff would have to devote to whatever form of review process might be es- tablished. As indicated in the report to the Council, it was suggested that the geographic areas which should be the focus for any architec- tural review process be limited to the viewsheds along E1 Camino Real, Highway 101 and Morro Road. Should such function be established there will be a need to adopt criteria so that applicants will know what the city is looking for. STAFF COMMENT: Should the Commission recommend to the Council adoption of some form of architectural review process, it should include regulatory powers. Absent regulatory powers, we could have the worst of both worlds, i.e. a good amount of time spent in trying to direct development towards - an agreed upon end but no assurance that anything will come of it. Re: Architectural *iew RECOMMENDATION: Following review and discussion, report a recommendation on the archi- tectural review process back to the City Council. HE:ps Enclosure: Staff Report - May 13, 1985 Council Minutes Excerpt - June 10, 1985 2 M E M O R A N D U M TO: City Council May 13, 1985 VIA: Michael Shelton, City Manager FROM: Henry Engen, Planning DirectortN RE: Architectural Review Report BACKGROUND Mayor Nelson has requested a report to the City Council on alternative approaches that might be considered to establish an architectural re- view process in the City of Atascadero. The purpose of this memoran- dum is to provide an overview of approaches that could be used. Coun- cil may wish to give policy direction to staff to come back with a more detailed evaluation of the most promising approach. GENERAL PLAN REFERENCES The Atascadero General Plan clearly anticipated that there would be some form of design review function incorporated in the City' s devel- opment review process. Appendix D contains a "draft ordinance" for a design review commission. Actually, Appendix D is more criteria to be used by a design review commission than it is an ordinance creating one. It didinot indicate the membership or powers, duties and appeals rights, etc.- of a commission, for example. With respect to the General Plan itself, there is the following quota- tions from "Community Appearance and Standards, " Chapter XIII pertain- ing to architectural review: "3. The architectural style of residential and commercial build- ings shall harmonize with the environment. If fencing is Bused, it shall be consistent with the style of the building. " Industrial Parks: 116. Building exteriors shall exhibit contin- uity, of acceptable materials and designs. " 1113. All buildings, signing and landscaping designs shall be subject to review. "Design Review. The jurisdiction of the Design Review Committee (see Appendix D) shall include, but not be limited to, application for _permits for : 1. Residential tracts 2. Industrial parks 3. Excavation and grading 4. Buildings on potentially unstable soil 5. Commercial signing 6 . Street landscaping Architectural Review Report 7. Design and landscaping of all public buildings 8 . Removal of trees from private and public properties" A design review committee was not established by the City; however, . development review standards criteria was built into the City' s up- dated zoning ordinance adopted in 1983. ZONING ORDINANCE PROVISIONS The City zoning ordinance provides the following language with respect to precise plan content (these are projects approved at staff level which require an environmental determination. They are now being listed in the Atascadero News under "Development Approvals") : "Architectural Elevations. For all structural uses except sin- gle family residences and agricultural accessory buildings. Ele- vations, renderings, or perspectives of each proposed structure shall be provided, identifying _ all exterior finish and roofing materials. . . . . " Conditional use permits acted upon by the Planning Commission also require submittal of architectural elevations. Pertinent to the arch- itectural review function, the following findings must be made before a conditional use permit project may be approved: " (iv) That the proposed project or use will not be inconsistent with the character of the immediate neighborhood or contrary to its orderly development; . . . . . . " Elevations, then, have been used to provide an understanding of what is being proposed in a project, but there is no definitive criteria in the zoning ordinance to establish a basis for mandating refinements to architectural elevations. AREAS OF CONCERN One area of complaint has been views from the freeway of recently con- structed large scale metal buildings that have not been customized to provide for visual interest. There has also been concern over the scale and character of some of the two-story condominium projects being constructed in the south end of the City. Occasionally, con- cerns have been expressed on some new buildings, which - although at- tractive in their own right clash in terms of color or architectural style with a�Ijoining buildings (e.g. Kragens and Adobe Plaza; Wendy' s blue roof wi - -, red tiled roof neighbors) . It appears t . t the primary focus with respect to geographic areas has been (1) the viewshed along Highway 101, (2) Morro Road frontage, and (3) visual impacts along the E1 Camino Real corridor. Since the city does not have tract housing construction, poor architecture across whole single family subdivision is not a local problem. Further, the generally larger single family lot sizes throughout Atascadero tends to limit the potential for architectural clashes. 2 Architectural ite ral Review Report 3 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW PROCESS ALTERNATIVES Broadly speaking, there appears to be three general approaches that the City could consider to create an architectural review process: 1) Architectural Review Commission - some cities, including San Luis Obispo, have established separate architectural review com- missions which meet every other week to review virtually every building permit being issued except for selected individual single family homes in non-sensitive locations. The positive aspect of this approach is that it provides a very strong quality control to the development review process. It can even mitigate poor zon- ing decisions by making buildings compatible with their neighbor- hood. On the debit size of the ledger, this process is expensive. In San Luis Obispo' s case, it requires a full time planner plus support staff to do the work necessary to get the ARC process to work. It also slows down the development review process which adds to the cost of a project. Given Atascadero' s resources, this approach would appear not to be practical at this time. 2) Architectural Review Committee - a subcommittee of the Planning Commission could be established to review the architectural as- pects of both precise plan and use permit projects. The City of Paso Robles utilizes this approach wherein three planning commis- sion members meet on the first and third thursdays of every month from 8:30 to 10 : 30 a.m. Typically, there are some seven agenda items ranging from freestanding signs to planned developments. Architectural review committee review occurs after a basic land use entitlement has been approved by their planning commission. Criteria for development review are included within their zoning ordinance (which is currently under re-evaluation) . Advantages of this approach include the use of the existing planning advisory group to deal also with architectural issues. 3) Staff Review - A third approach would =be to amend the zoning ordinance to include criteria for architectural review. Precise plan approvals would continue to be granted by staff and matters going to the planning commission or city council would carry anal- ysis and recommendations on architectural treatment with either body dealing with that issue as part of the overall project. Since architectural evaluation is a subjective process, it could be argued that this approach, while more streamlined, would be difficult to assign to staff. RECOMMENDATION Following review and discussion, refer the matter to the Planning Com- mission for a recommendation back to the City Council on the concept felt to hold the most promise. 3 -r �r' Ca lJ�/L MJ/V UTAS' EA 6/10/85 CGTJ�TC?L *UTES _ .� PAGE EIGHT Fiscal Year 1984/85 Audit Agreement - City of Atascadero Mr. Shelt explains that, to date, the City has not eyed int an audit agre nt for fiscal year 1984/85, and recom ds contracting with the firm of ert M. Moss Accounting Corpor on. He continues that the City has tilized this firm several years with outstanding results, and is it is adva gous to continue contract- ing with the firm. It is noted that the propose cont t is for $3 ,175, which i 4.10% higher than the 1983./-84 contract. No public comment s made on this item. MOTION: ncilman Handshy moves and Councilman Mali second to APPROVE the 1984/85 fiscal year City of Atascade Audi with Robert M. Moss Accountancy Corporation for $3,175. C-3 Architectural Review Report Mr. Engen review possible alternatives to establish an architectural design review process within the City of Atascadero. Alternatives include: 1. Architectural Review Commission - Reviewing almost all propos development except for non-sensitive areas, which could requi full-time Planner and support staff. 6 2. Architectural Review Committee - A subcommittee of the Planning Commission to review architectural aspects of Precise Plan and Use Permit projects. 3. Staff Review Amend the Zoning Ordinance to include criteria for architectural review, which would apply to precise plans and use permits going to the Planning Commission. Candidate Locations for the the architectural review process would be E1 Camino Real, the freeway corridor, and Morro Road. Council discusses a possible negative reaction from the public related to a regulatory type of architectural control, and indicates that an informative approach may be more acceptable and hopefully create less delay in permit processing. Councilma'% Molina expresses his concerns related to proceeding with the formation of an Architectural Committee without amending the Zoning Ordinance and General Plan also. He also feels that the Zoning Ordinance should resolve any architectural concerns that may exist. �x�� 6/10/85 COUNCIL M TES PAGE NINE Public Comment Mr. Richard Shannonuestions the us fu (D q usefullness. of such a committee, as it is in the best interest of the builder to build an attractive structure. i Ms. Andrea Shultie states there is a need to control irresponsibility. Prior to incorporation of such a committee, staff needs to research surrounding cities as to their means of architectural review. Mr. Jean Cole agrees with the need for some consistency between structures related to design, elevation, and aesthetic value. With experience in this area, he offers to donate his services to the City. No motion is presented on this item. However it is the consensus of the Council to favor Alternative Number 2 comprised of a subcommittee of the Planning Commission in a guidance but not regulatory role. This item to be presented to the Planning Commission and returned to Council with their recommendations'. Fiscal Year 1984/85 Audit Agreement - Atascadero Cou anitation District. No discu on is given to this item, as it relates to Item C- . MOTION: By Co`t�ncilman Molina and Seconded by Councilwoman Mackey, f to APPROVE the 1984/85 Audit Agreement f the Atascader County Se }itation District by'" Robert M. Moss Accountanc Corporatio for $2, 375. ,Community_ Forum Mr. Terry Graham discusses the ' tent f the public hearing processK the feeling of little influenc� elected officials by the public special interest groups speaking/at uncil Meetings, locations fo� elderly care facilities, possableoncerns related to the "Po Project" which is presently�eing processed by the City of Atascadero depressed feelings by the general public t, r the Atascadero Cit Council which causes thom to move from this a ea, and Council ' s desir to vote on proposed projects against the citize ' s desires. Ms. Cindy Bast resents Council with a petition to oZ Nelson o aproximately 150 names who agree with the banning swimming i LA-tascac�erake but requests the re-opening of the wading p 1. gie Rice expresses her desires for the wading pool to re ed, providing safety improvements are done to the pool a a,cifically the slippery surface of the pool. \Nq GFH Architecture, Planning & GraphiCS 8344 MORRO ROAD ATASCADERO, CA 93422 (805) 466-76' OCTOBER 8, 1986 I 'D LIKE TO FIRST THANK YOU FOR THIS OPPORTUNITY TO PRESENT TG `:'OU WHAT, SINCE OUR CREATION BY THE PREVIOi�S CITY COUNCIL, BACK IN SEPT MBEF: OF 1935, HAS TAKEN APPROXIMATELY A YEAR OF WEEKLY MEETINGS TO GEi�ERATE PER OUR PURPOSE AND GOAL AS PREVIOUSLY ESTABLISHED. I 'D ALSO LIKE TO THANK MY VERY DE�jOTED AND SACRAFICING COMMITTEE MEMBERS, HENRY ENGEN, JOE ELKINS, HAROLD HAYES, AND TINA METZGER WHO SO RELIGOUSLY MET EACH WEEK, STUDIED CASE HISTORIES, REPORTED ON RESEARCH ASSIGNED, ANALYZED PROJECTS WITH OUR CRITERIA T.0 HELP REFINE OUR PUBLICATION AS WELL AS CREATING PORTIONS OF TEXT, SUB—CATEGORIES, AND PASTING UP THIS ROUGH DRAFT YOU HAVE BEFORE YOU THIS EVENING. THE PURPOSE, FOR THOSE WHO MAY NOT BE AWARE OF WAS AND IS TO FREPARE A COMPLETE SET OF GUIDELINE~ FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT D=_Pri�.TP,1ENT TO USE, AND IF DEEMED NECESSARY, TO CHANGE THE WORDING IN THE GE`,EFQ'14L P_AN TO COINCIDE WITH ALTERNATIVE 03 OF THE STAFF REPORT ..11TH c;u°iE VARIATIONS. ALTERNATIVE #3 WAS A THIRD ATERNATIVE FOR AN ARCHITECTURE *.L R&)IEZ.J PROCESS. THE FIRST WAS AN ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION, THE SECOND, AN ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (A SUBCOMNITTEE OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO REVIEW THE ARCHITECTURAL ASPECTS OF BOTH PRECISE PLAN AND USE PERMIT PROJECTS) AND THE THIRD, A STAFF REVIEW 'WITH 'ti1Eii'ING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO INCLUDE CRITERIA FOR ARCHITECTURAL REVIEU1. THIS ^OMNITTEE HAS BEEN INVOLVED IN PUTTING TOGETHER AN APPEARANCE GUIDELINES THAT WOULD NOT RESTRICT ARCHITECTURAL STYLE OR CREATIVE St;L;; IONS TO DEVELOPMENTS, BUT TO ADDRESS THE RISING CONCERN THAT WAS THE CATYLIST FOR OUR CREATION, THAT OF THE INCREASING PERCENTAGE OF POORLY DESIGNED PROJECTS IN COMPARISON TO THOSE THAT ARE VER`( ATTRACTIVE AND ADD TO THE ENVIRONMENT IN WHICH OUR COMMUNITY HAS THE POTENTIAL OF GROWING INTO. WE HAVE DESIGNED A PUBLICATION THAT ADDRESS' THESE DIFFERENCES FROM SUCH CONCERNS AS TO THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE B'JILC-IPJGS TO THE SITE TO SPECIFIC APPLICATIONS SUCH AS METAL BUILDI[40 , SOLriR EQUIPMENT AND MOBILE HOME PARK DE")ELOPMENTS. LET ME ASK YOU ALL, WHAT IS YOUR FIRST IMPRESSION OF ATASCADERO AS YC,U DRIVE THROUGH JUST THE HWY. 101 CORRIDOR? EL CAMINO REAL MORRO ROAD EVEN PARTS OF TRAFFIC WAY IS IT ONE OF A CONTINUITY OF BUILDING DESIGN, MATERIALS, COLur. SCHEIKIES COMPLIMENTED BY APJ ARRA'( OF LANDSCAPING, FULL`' NATURED AND MAINTAINED. OR IS IT ONE OF METAL BUILDINGS, 'SEry—OF—ASPHALT PARKING LUTa, LOLLY—PCP REARSOF BUILCIr11GS COLLECTING DEBRIS AND OLD CARS WITH C.Hl1ItI LI i< rl A SIGNS, , FENCES AS VISUAL BAIRRIERS? THIS MAY SOUND EXTREME, BUT AFTER STUDYING OUR COMMUNITY IPJ DEPTH (IS TO APPEARANCE THERE IS MUCH Ri)G1 FOCI IMPROVEMENT. I BELIEVE OUR PUBLICATION IS IN DIRECT RESPONSE TO A NEED. WE ARE IPJ HOPES THAT THIS PUBLICATION WILL STIMULATE THE USE OF GOOD DESIGN QUALITIES SUCH AS MASSING, SCALE, PROPORTION, RHYTHM, THE USE OF VOIDS AND SOLIDS, VARIATION, USE OF MATERIALS, FOR BETTER OVERALL DESIGN AND SITE PLANNING OF PROJECTS IPJ OUR COMMUNITY. THESE QUALITIES CAN ALSO BE APPLIED TOWARDS SIGNAGE, THE APPLICATION OF SOLAR EQUIPMENT, STREET FURNITURE, MISCELLANEOUS STRUCTURES AS WELL AS THE SITE PLANNING, STREET DETAILS AND RECREATIONAL BUILDINGS FOR MOBILE HOME PARKS. THIS PUBLICATION COULD BE THE FIRST STEP TOWARDS STOPPING THE "SUBSIDIZING" OF POORLY DESIGNED PROJECTS IN OUR COMMUNITY. WHAT YOU DECIDE TONIGHT ABOUT THESE GUIDELINES, WILL SHAPE THE QUALITY OF FUTURE DEVELOPMENT IN OUR COMMUNITY AND AS A RESULT WILL DETERMINE THE QUALITY OF THAT COMMUNITY, BOTH IPJ LIFESTYLE AND ENVIRONMENT. IT GOES WITHOUT SAYING THAT THIS PUBLICATION IS ONLY AS GOOD AS THE SUPPORT DEMONSTRATED HERE TONIGHT AND THE FOLLOW-THRU OF OUR ENFORCEMENT AT THE REVIEW LEVELS AS WELL AS DURING CONSTRUCTION. ;I BELIEVE IT IS IMPERATIVE THAT WE, AS A COMMUNIT`( BEGIN TO THINK ABOUT TOMORROW INSTEAD OF SACRIFICING IT FOR TODAY. WE PROUDLY SUBMIT THIS PUBLICATION TO YOU, OUR CITY LEADERS AND RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOUR SINCERE STUDY OF ITS CONTENT AS WELL AS ITS INTENTIONS AND SEEK A UNAMOUS APPROVAL. WE REL`( UPON YOUR . DESCRIMINATING TASTE AND VISION FOR THE FUTURE OF OUR COMMUNIT`(. i aoa GFH Architecture, Planning & Graphics 8344 MORRO ROAD ATASCADERO, CA 93422 (805) 466-76, THE LIST THAT FOLLOWS IS A LIST OF AREAS IN WHICH THIS COMMITTEE, KNOWING THAT WE CANNOT PROMOTE WITHIN THE DEFINITION OF OUR PURPOSE, BUT FEEL WOULD BE VER`( INSTRUMENTAL FOR THE CONTINUED SUPPORT OF THIS PUBLICATION AND THE BETTERMENT OF OUR COMMUNITY'S ENVIRONMENT. 1 . STRENGTHEN CRITERIA FOR TREE REMOVAL STANDARDS 2. ADOPTION OF DENSITY RATIOS FOR SLOPED SITES TO REDUCE DENSITY ON STEEP SLOPED SITES. (REFER TO ATTACHED EXAMPLE OF FORMULA) 3. CREATION OF A LANDSCAPING PLAN GUIDELINE FOR PRECISE PLAN SUBMITTAL AND BUILDING PERMIT. (EI . , COUNTY OF S.L.O.) 4. THE CREATION OF A NEW USE ZONE FOR OUR CITY, THAT OF A CENTRAL BUSINESS DOWNTOWN ZONE AS WELL A A CIVIC OR GOVERNMENTAL USE ZONE. WE WOULD HAVE TO AMEND NOT ONLY THE ZONING ORDINANCE BUT CRE-HTE THE PHYSICAL BOUNDARIES FOR SUCH ZONES. 5. CREATE A RELATIQNSHIP BETWEEN OUR CITY AND CALTRANS TO AFFORD SOME TRADE—OFFS FOR FUTURE DEVELOPERS ON PARCELS THAT FRONT HIGHWAY 101 TO ESTABLISH A MEANS OF LANDSCAPING OUR FREEWAY CORRIDOR. 1r'ALTF':>N3 HAS ELIMINATED THEIR LANDSCAPING BUDGET BUT WOULD WORK WITH C0111':Ut' ITIZES ON A ONE—TO—ONE BASIS FOR JUST THIS PURPOSE. 6. THE ADOPTION OF A REVISED AND EXPANDED PLANT LIST FOR THE CITY OF ATASCADERO. WE HAVE TAKEN THE LIBERTY OF CREATING A NEW LIST ThiAT ENCOMPASSES A RANGE OF PLANTS AND TREES FROM 40' AND HIGHER IN SIZE TO GROUNDCOVER. THIS LIST INCLUDES OVER 200 INDIVIDUAL TYPES. (ATTACHED) 7. ESTABLISH AN AWARD PROGRAM FOR QUALITY DEVELOPMENTS WITH'It"d OUR COMMUNITY, CO—SPONSORED BY THE CITY, THE B.I .A. , CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND POSSIBLY SERVICE CLUBS. B. PROMOTE QUALITY DEVELOPMENTS AT THE COMMUNITY DE'V'ELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY EXAMPLE WITH PHOTOS, DRAWINGS, PLANS BEING DISPLAYED IN OUR PLHfdPd1j t'G DEPARTMENT FOR THE PUBLIC TO SEE AS THEY COME IN AND INQUIRE POR THEIR POTENTIAL DEVLOPMENT. 9. Ik ;,.ATE THE INSTALLATION OF STREET TREES ( OR ALLOWANCE FOR. CREDIT ON BUSY=s_a LICENSE, CHAMBER MEMBERSHIP, ETC.) FOR INCENTIVES FOR THOSE BUSINESSALREADY IN A DEVELOPED AREA AND REQUIRED FOR THOSE NEWLY DEVELOPED ONES. 10. PROMOTE CENTER LANDSCAPED ISLANDS AND POSSIBLY TEXTURED PEDESTRIAN WALK14-, 3 TO HELP IN REDUCING SPEE=DING AND BREAKING UP OF THE "SEH OF ASPHALT° SPECIFICALLY ALONG EL CAM REAL, MORRO ROAD AND EVEN ;'METS OF TRAFFIC WAY. ENTRADA COULD POTENTIALLY BE CONVERTED INTO A PEGESTRIArJ MALL WITH ISLANDS, TREES AND STREET FURNITURE IN HOPES OF REVI I"lLIZING THIS AREA AS THE NEW POSTAL SERVICE FACILITY MOVES INTO THE AREH. n 11 . KNOWING THERE IS A BUDGETED AMOUNT FOR THE UNDERGROLCDING OF UTILITIES, THE CENTRAL BUSINESS AREA WOULD BE AN IMPORTANT AREA TO BEGIN THIS REVITALIZATIC94 FOR IT'S FUTURE REDEVELOPMENT. 12. INITIATED THE ATASCADERO CREEK DEVELOPMENT TO CREATE A POSITV E RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE CIVIC AREA AND A MAJOR PART OF THE COttlERCIAL (CENTURY PLAZA) AREA. 13. REQUIRE COLOR SCHEMES FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS AS A PART OF THIS APPEARANCE REVIEW SUBMITTAL AND PRECISE PLAN SUBMITTAL. 14. THE POTENTIAL OF SEPARATING THE TWO KINDS OF TRAFFIC THAT EXIST ALONG EL CANINO REAL, THAT OF THROUGH TRAFFIC AND THAT OF THE SHOPPER. THIS COULD BE DONE QUITE SIMPLY WITH ISLANDS, RE-ALIGNMENT OF LANES AND PARKING AREAS AS WELL AS CIRCULATION PATTERNS. 15. PUBLIC PARKING LOTS ARE A "NOT-SO-FAR-OFF" NEED THAT THE CITY NEEDS TO CONSIDER TO HELP REVITALIZE THE "CBD" AREA. THIS WOULD ALSO SUPPORT THE IDEA OF A PEDESTRIAN MALL CONCEPT IN THE ENTRADA AREA.(EI . : SANTA CRUZ, SANTA BARBARA, ETC. ) 16. IF A CIVIC AND DOWNTOWN USE ZONE IS CREATED, THE ZONING C-IRDINACE MAY WANT TO MODIF`( ITS BUILDING HIEGHT LIMITS TO ACCOMODATE A HIGHER DENSITY USE IN THESE AREAS. THE FIRE CONCERN COULD BE HANDLED TEMPORARILY BY STAND PIPES AND SPRINKLERS UNTIL THE FIR` DEP!'I 'TMIENT COULD AQUIRE THE, NECESSARY EQUIPMENT TO PROPERLY SERVE STRUCTURES. L I I � t •tr I dp � I••\IM T,. �•p�f Iii I ' \M1AII VJ +w•f�' • I �•i Mi/wl . +�' • .o Arm ;� ,'�{ \fir�♦ �I ♦ ILrt.a 1�.. ' rA\Y� • � "I AMurW•y11 �r .�� }. r M�• ..•IMS '1'. •", All � • •�•• � � �, .',:- t~~y it • '��4'^J' :'♦ �� ; �� ;,fit •• �� • f � �� ray I n l 0 • L O u L d c � E c` L L O a a c a D c c O c D a L c c N c O O a it cE O ct: a ix Ofo U CL LL O X U •- a a •- -W .- ++ 6 Fa� w � a d. to O ni D. c •- c �-. 0 � Cr1 c L - n +► +' U w X a a 0 u N c N O C7 7- L E •- ..- O IT•- to •- 0 F-- c E a c as N D N C.n N O F- ►-� a 0 +' a O N O N a N m U 2U aQ i4 LL Q W c Z E E W L � 0 .c W � U a c c u E :> c L O u c w rb — c a# �6 O N ... -C .- a m N r6 0 J � U Z c 0 L a � c 'O a .- ►•y - N •- 0 L IW a Q do z u •- 0 a N c O O Z c rt L) i 11. W a mZU to OZ a u c 0 Z O Z U L a r6 t, a.t i U a 0-4.. (d X (d O L O a lid V F- L � � cL � 4 L. � Z E u P. !G fd a O m a t �b - L TJ old P-4 - Q U 3mmm CL � E- � ,� ww � U (nW4- z • 7ZZW0 WmUJ ... Ul0X = f- F- 0-+ F- -- O f- Z U] U co U- p O U U) ,-) 0 — � ZF- JO ¢ 00 OQ ~ w ¢ owcr. (1) 00 „� 3 pa. ¢ (1) " } (00 O W Z LL Z Q w 0: U) F- 0 a, .-. 0 0 ~ ZUO � OW � Z O Q UW •4 LL OZW DZ EWH OW3zx ~ i O Z w u 3 0:: O W W ►-+ Cnc� CLZWZF- W Z O t7 '', OI Z -JWWWN < w WJa � = w - - a- 0 = WJWU = x - a w 01 F- 3CL0QF- UU ¢ d Cl) w In ow w • U) ?- W U) Z O d Y >- Z F- IL d } W X - (D Z 3 ?- = Z Z Z F- 0 0 QflD3 a0wwXoa ,-- Z0ZF- U0JZ — WF- f- • Q ¢ QW 0-4 " ZF- ¢ Q ¢ ZLLaP-, 0-� .-• }, U wDmC, UyWQF- p F- U ¢ ..., Z JZ3F- �I >- WXJUW .. = WQ� U) W a O Ix O WO Z F- UU ¢ DU U •,X O '\ F- >- W ¢ OUrvU) XZ W O " ZZ3U) Z � 00UOW ¢ wo ~ . :rWZW W Z Z U ¢ = ~ } _ � U) zZLZ �1 � UUQZ ~ W 12L JZ _ � "X ZOZ F- Z .-. OWf-- WO 0 ,-, ..¢ WZ } �.._. ;- ~ ¢ WZ CL pW OF- ZW ¢ � � WZJ � ¢ O ¢ F- � U � W W W W J -ZCO W '-+ Oma ¢ U ►-• O L L OL OF- F}- ¢ WZ 'J ti- _j (n 3 WtnZ ¢ U LL (n LY w W 1-. CL d p x 0 W Jz �W- Q (DZ QYU) = () xU) JOW ¢ OZf- p � WLL = U Z �_ W " U F- Z Z Z F- 0 Z _� 40,J �.cy- 0E- ¢ Q � OJ � Z �-. Uwe ..200 ~ ¢ pp � 0 ¢ = WO �" LU - XZm ¢ w � E- � ~ QUW -iu W '-' Z U 410 .7 OZ -0X0ZOZ O � JU) QUW W Q,. U) " LL XX0 }- O U) ¢ F- WF- �-. � OQ � ,..., � Z f, Q wCL0 U') F- w � F- U �Ooow ZU X �., U � Z � Z x � uwiwJ ¢ n- Z ¢ a- W � � a- � to- wW- (D - 3w _j � - w0OF cnwQZ " L) O U — F- 00 <1 0 • QUw Jo _ Ofn ¢ �nw ~ Xi- YJJ wx = ZZ ► OF' ► W -1W � i1F- � , ... ►_lOn rt00 � -gyp0U) � (!) 3JD :> 03X C L) F L) OLM00 p-q < P-4QX --- O� F- OO ¢ U) UU X ¢ O Q Z W 0 a l~J C7 '� N w N Ct w N L�l co — N U-) N4 00 O• . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . W Q . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . cr- v, O - wG - F- F- W U W d W F- W W F- OC O Z G Z F- - 0 u', F— Q Z - Z W w Q W (n 37 (1) 0 F- CA 0 • Z Z Z < W Z O W - - U; 0 M . • wJ J F- - F- 0 Y Z - Ln, Z Z w Eco • J Oa m F- X Z CL Ti O - 0 LL LL O Z N Q 0 W CK Lo • .-. G O C7 J Z C� F- � • V =U' CL W Z co 1 Q Z U u' U ►-+ ►-+ Q W O w Z 0 ►-• W F- • 3 2 2 u W u O J J r OLLM W . � Z Z LL Q 4T F- O tt = > • U1 D O O d Z J Z Q m � r5 LV w W u .-+ J W J W • w X F- F- ul 0 Ln W F- O J 0~ _J n • il1 U <1 Q 0 J Z U Z U Q Q 0 • w O W J J Z ►-+ C7 W ►-+ w F- J M • W X U W W <I O ►-+ ►-+ Q ►-+ W Cl 0 O W • U LL Z x w J CD w Z Z U Z w Z U a 77 w L._ Cl 4. W Q J Ut I� LL w U Lt1 Ww • • • • • r • ■ • • • x z w CLN �� � L;� O w fl- F- it a u Ce >- Z0U) -LL 3F- aJ SZF- O >.- wOOZ J < : zZ >- 0 w U0Z WISE- � ►-+ X L) 0 F-- Z w � <[ w '/X� X F- .w !_._ OL W F- p � = d � � �w } m z w � Zw � � p -1 ¢ QF- 0 wJ w0 Z to Z = OO -1U UF- WO O � Z ... (La. ZaOU X3JZ w3 WWF- O � UW z Z wm '7 O W Z , �1y LLF- UUP FS- tZ'� •. >- W � p � �W ZZ ( � NWrr Q < LL F-(f) � UUQo OQ � w In UZ � z 0 W O Q W U <L W 0 0 Q WCL Sw 2O = OW 0 X NW -1WO7 � F- O ~ = QQdZ = Za � tnO � � LL L) Q ~ S ~ = 0Q OZ3a' (n ND ~ ZF- � F- � W ~ WIx WCtF- z1O 'W-' � W 0-4 OL7Qm OW O w Q W � 0U EO1-4 WWJ _Z d (aE �CL W � W J � ZaW. J � ZZ ~ = F- XZ W0 W OXOW W X00 '"' CDQ u0 " JJO • wW W 0E- Z En Z W W w OW � U) LLi Z OD ZEx w0WX C3 ( OZOWp S J 0 D j 0 x m 0 0 J D� Q F- 0 U LL < 0 F F- O U a tL F- 0_ F- LL WW tL W W U W Z " -JS <L • S03 � WVF- O w LL F-- F-- 0 0 M a t LL O W W W z 1 w w w _o S J >- to }- U3 X c cn 0ZU � S � * = ud �. UQ J_ �,'rr- p wz _U -+ �Zy S S F-- f-- <r Z_ z 4T O <E F- F- J <r w 0 Z U O .w z► F- >- Ox - � N <t 3E � � 30 LLi `, w SZ <[ U W . O W 0 1 0 S W U ix 4- ?- t� 0 W W .-. O F- z Q ►-� W IOL wLL WQx h6- w - wa. X ~ ZO JOZ 00 Z }. 0 FF-- F- Za it J0dO 0Z � Z S W D _j ~ aX QuWX ¢ N 0 (LW O � O ~ 0-4 ww F- WS OOwcl: -�LL 0 � F- WO wU) •" W Wp CY. M U tnJmx W w (n S Z WF- WF- � JL LO WmW 0 3 a J O a CL Z 0 ., <1 0 U ~ W W O UB z C)U W D W a- <1 � 3 = F- -JJ Z 0- U -1 .w W Q W w <E (n W ZIxL a. <1Z3- O OWEO 0 <1 WF- �Lw XWO ►., SW F- z wxZS x � F- O OU >- WW WOw � U) W UrlOri WPW O WS � <L ~ oZZpZ W W � OZ ►-� ' ' t1 a0: 0L) w O} dCL - w07 >- 00 -13 OF- XW OWir ZO OSZLL t-) zWUJZJ WO F- Wwa F- X0- � tA F- 3wO W �-+ O W O ►.., d. O J W Q C] 0 :> u SF- Xmww tI > > O • F- < 00CLn < u- a-aLL Q t1� U W N Z Ci y co y F. ti J W 6.0 W O = O <¢ Z = Cr F- O uj 43�Z W 22 Q U C _ G Ch¢�Q p wW a~ J Q V = C 9 W W Vmam X UJ � O V Z O< Z 1LL a �W �4 vCL W W . v W = _W W �N ,Nicm <- =- LU W LLJaCL cc CL CL CL Wm W 2 W O a < <6. LAJ W y CL 0~t� z Q Qt..tLLJ Zm st}O- ' uj cr CL q N a z ams<� a a �m W V �a a --�Ji� �- �izQ � x `73 AJ W P" J C ... � J w W Q "" z0 z 1-:1w 3 � � w SCLw0 z ..W wwJCL 0 X .,. © CLI � d ' 0 ,- J a- � w WW U � = WU0 LL W0 `L ) to W LL W W p W i� 0 <r <1Q: JULY !L (n ~ = w (1) <1 wo 0-4 CL U W c 3ow �- � Zw0 -4 z cn wQ `� ~ � � � � LL. � w � qtr O '-' OwJ 0 W +-� <[ CL w 00E- ,-e mww cLwcr� ' i S w w i _ � S 3 }' C3 Z F- z H U � POZU W W lLU ¢ J d. zx - Uw �- Zz LLZW 130 0 <1 �' w Z L) -- Qttmcn zww W Ix xzF- Wwz ¢ U) ¢ xw Q � U) aw. oulWa. } 0OLF-- W0- W0 0 O- zwSwzc CL .., , = a. WiX LLWW a - xx - 0 < 0LC3 HQCs IX IM 3 ' o y � >o N d W r O 1� O w W ww w - y • �' SySQW USF- LLg L <1 z W T H - W L /T cn Z C \ = oJe+ J W m N J \L (� W 6 Q O d OSE W O LL (f) O U O J Q a. `~`' 6'4y iT� Q die r G J�� % NJ CG N O O >. .r+ 6"'i t L O p✓ O Z G W w a Y 11�j rYr6y. G r V `•2 O OL) ZF- Fes = QGJ R M r rr9 N V W W� O 61 � tQ.l Ow ~ ~ a ` rte CL ,• 4 u U N p LL L_ y,. Fy J W I spy J W z ff O w J a.E Z z m� € C-'LA 0 in o U : by I% n J G� s s y6� Jgx0- � Oww � � �.. O to W ... J w 3 away aaQ � , N Z S " H Z QQF- WF- JOQW to < a Z ][ L) (X a Q U " aJ C3 O SJ � UJZ W J Isa r v,a. r -(Xc <0 U. <E cXLL0 QcxwQ }- ?- � U1Qzw ;zWZWWJWUyJGJW >- W W S J F- O Z 4T L) .� •-• Q • (j) w cn % _j Z <L F- ¢ ZF- t' " LL ... ZZ >- " :3Z0-4 < ZWE0cn wow w W -1 3 0" wW 03 aJ W ¢ p'q W w�-+ � J ...� ¢ w ix as wa . waUna. J � aUMwaD " = in Q Otn LL 0 QtnaU Z Q a- O ~ OQU _j FW- aatWw = Z <EW � Z < = d 3 � J o J W <LF' XF'- F- Q " MOWQ ►-4 U OCX . aa , o ¢ aJ " Z Z JAZ F- l' 00 UL w Iw (f) LL. OwWQoO Ua WtC � UZ . QQ � C7 _j ZIx � w W LL `" :r< 4T ago LL F- " zZ Z � • cn CU. V LL QUlbtnJaO `0 LL -i L) L) wwO Z � ~ WNm ia- Q F- JOS OW ..-. `l' Ow UUZUQpw O _ w O co a Z L) 3W � hd- wU " w~ 3 ... WOF� ^LC� _ O (� � � Ox wOW0wd � � U � CpZa0CL a. -o Q„ ZXM OL F- ? LL = aQwZa. z wacn L) LLz ►-• ." O U �,, � Z W N W Z_ W J - to � '`' W Z _ F- w n � >- '7 3 x •-• Q �r, w � F- wi � oot- W � �a00Z � z � ic _jXoa! o '" ..� U t.. z U w w J F- ... W CL o � O Z 3 O a p W w a Zc' wwo (0 ¢ } L)) a <E wt... w F- ~ <t ¢ = Wa0 " Z " a m U3Q WL) J J3U UF- W X -JJZ " UO.. Q w �.• WCL J � ZZF- ~' F- WdtYtnW ►-� 0W0ZF- 0 " 41 J WZ � J " F- OJr.. .-rz ... " PozO W LL > oQwUJ o. awc- a > owaaZ ¢ F- � F- � LL ¢ O wwxElwwR a � 3w, dwamIaNawnw. w � L) Za � ¢ LL w LO U) Z J M0 ? U wz b-4 w Q (j) 0 " F- W 0J <r .. O M P-@ L) w O F- C0 F- U? O � J U) � ZQ E Zw ZS ~ lLW > .. (301-+ QV" Qp 0E- ir F- W L) wUQ ! C-) w..,, O 0WW0 I W J U) w 0 ZJHw UWOQ } U Z , D U O' Z U W F- W ir 0_ Ix W UJ0 l fX `" w J ¢ NQ . _ w w c� W '3 -- C.) -j - �- - P- F- W3 ZC.) 0w �-• W ¢ ,., ON UNzZU) w � (0 3Z o- .... � o - 0Zc~.� -3x <Z juM F- c� P- P-o -J wwa. D!CLU) ZF- � X >- Z0 � 0WF -JW U) M O - WF- 0- J - JQ " = 0 U- 0_ _ O _j ZZ I >- EF- > WM ~ M W <1 F- Q * -• tVCD0 Q1<[L3000- M0 M O F- F- U) w U. -U) wU. � w Z = O w = i U S F- O 0_ w F- .-+ d F- w Zw W W ...� }- M F- i � FZ- OWW w w `� >.- W cnI � tnF- � —M wOW � U -i D Ow0Z ¢ � 00 = 0_ .w F- Z - 0 I 2Z SUE U) U) dM � Zw0 <t0 Z Z U M <1 (0 - Q = mWU ¢ -w¢ ZUw ( J a.Z F- 0_ Z O_ J Ix _ 3w wZ W ¢ w •w� U- = JQW = 0_ = U) W JU • F- F- Z Z F- Q >- p- >-= w � WXW - F- Zn=. ZQ L) M (j) � . 3 � F- D, F- Z b-6 (f) W X0CL O O - M— < ZZW MW 3Ixw0 aZaZHCLF- <Lt0.1 dW6-4 W ," (L L) Q0Cux < w0- Z wWD- ixco wx 2wp" Dwx " DA F- X W 0_ 4 F- 0 t. t H 47 . •! r N s _ .. y M. I �- W LL W C7 w Cry }- 000 OSZ = }- JWf.) mp0u w = mF^ F- F- F- o ►-+ WzQ �¢ aJ .-+ j .-. Wf:� � nLIDWL] F" pc p w Sh- � tWM CL F— <1 < ww � � po [n3c1n � WWLL C) n: '� o � Z ,.., P" lz ccw a. wim ww = i.�- � � Ic U) w .L..,�- a' `w Q J L.. Q w V � z Z Q Q J F- � w F- I Q W ZCnm W Q ..yam a. =:i W Z F Z V O O F... r"" "' in m '"' r� J F- Z Ix w = w OV w V JF-- p O ~' ~ ZCn <r - W O = H chitck: W J .., Z O J u zwp Q `7 J mW W jroZ � Z = cU.,� w Wzu0: 0j - t=- Z3 LVA F- LL w= o � W QEF- WZQn W a wU Jw0 � i. -iwwO wG � Wt.) ~ Q S w w Z Z OQaZcn � QZSF- �, v, .-. `J' p 72 W w = o m 0 ~ J O ¢ l L I W wU =D i. � w <E h' W W � Q ' Q3 (n Wix 0M (M C7 ~ :z<E lzOWC� C!y F WQ c-) FS- OWQ: � W JO wmwcnIx QmF=- Q. = cn cn w cna. S cnF— "" :3 JwQ ,J wwwQwnxm W W F- W (nX .) j� Jn. xQ a F=- F=-• HQQ ¢ NOFz— Fz— Q HW- , U- �.� 3 <1 DDt,a -I -nv �- £ civ —i D � -� mO --ADD DoZDtm7 z m-� zmOM ... rZDSz -100 -gyp r .. -4 � D r } vo -< roDmr- :c 10 o � = � mr � O0 -0 • mmQ . � Dmm _C ... D o , om DmOZ � Zua � ovcmmo � . v D m £ mm = QTr-o D mD � -0 � v amm co � ZDr) z oDmmD _ "�= � -iZ 9-4 Z � � � 3 � �CD Om � 3m � m • -D4GOrZD ;0z C D 3 MO cnvcn � .{ --tel = mZ 7c cn � D3 = X30 z (() £ % m m c -c m C:: " mz3MD -4Oi --0 --q M 00D0 (.0 � � m -0 ... C £ zp � r' zr . m0m � -z-� Zi -1r � • o r' D m I DQ :E mD r- Z _� D rD D � D -I £ -I Z m0tnm -i -Im -n =: - r - --ioicDm � -, oom — rmS — M- ZrmmZOG-) M u0 -mn -zi "nm 0m :EDcn0 -oDD D MT - O -Oz ZDDD ► Oxmzmwmm mmSMmO CTTTi •m . mE3- --�Dm cm � m .� 10 ua m -� m -< -� m ; M � DZ -gZ w C c_nOzmvm , c, D m�- -D G) D m m = oo � t1-4 zna � DcnrZ r ZD .r- cs) 3r -Ivm ua ZZ cmm �-» Z mD v M o — ZrT-- m -rt ODDmN � o .... .{ C m M om DDC o 3 " cov m D � m -n i Z �- ; c 0 -v m m D r 17 0m c� ►-� m O z ;Ov0 z -IO •0 OD•` c . O � ZDZ £ m m Z < mm �° z � cnrvD m D 3 rr',ipm � � c� m -< _mrrmrr�� � m = Z 0OOZ Q_ C" -Z{ 0oc0Mzc D z � oZ � o -i --� m � � x00D ; om Dir .., 71M _ D -� b-+ m T -0C -< zZ ;0 mT M ... m fr mD �.... 0 V 0D _ � z pmp( j) zDr.� DJ> cDE � (no O m ZCCMW E mO0 . � mv -gy `" mTDZ -{ cm " zzoz % mwr � z6-4 "zozz biim 0 -I Z -q -q m m r 0 (7) n a) c) --i m m m b SWIM _ rjty . ._rL� `;{ • •~ ` 'moi - + a �� 't 31•> _ �`_'�'Sir .v � ,� mow �� p y p ' �✓'tea. ` II O O O O O Z 2i U MoOUZ (n = M '- F- h- W .••., -� Z O 00 iDO � pHp � O 'h-" 3 ~ 0.4L =3 W CJ J --• L W U Z O W -;O (n � W 0•• LLJ CL CD �-- W � O "W W m � d- N 2 LLJ Lo W V-" >- 1= F_ • W Q �=• Q OUOU ZQC � O` SOW 's -r J I.L W O W Q ~* O FH ...� r O w � UOOF- � r U) M zOL) C) L) t i LwLI Z J ~ C~t� <1 W L) W d. O '-' � .Z-4 U- U a W-� OW U Jt-- O zLLJ U W .-+ °° OLuZLU in <[ � � W �wa- :;p = p3 LU pW � Zi O = UJ SOW -, F'- �,_ Zp C) W W Z z zo <Ea wt- cn �+ t- Z ,-, CD Z_ w Q ••- Lu P-4 W � wti � � 0 Q � 0=DO � WW � Q OQ >- OpC•» ti .-. �-• ¢ .-. toJ � U U . . 0 = � I Q W = OCLWWQWOmc=.O3 � 0L) U) o W W p < Q = uiF- -' _ WQ L) W (Xa- W -JO w (xw (n <C i w W W Nd S U7H ►-� � -� WQJ wWWQWO � = W W 1— w0 (r. 0 :ZE'• � a- � 2 COL. = = = F- tY_ ZF- F- = = O = W O Qt) 0h- 1-' UQ F-- � LL 34 I - p _ - w - ooZtnoOCeZw 3a Z `TQtno ¢ F- � I z 0 0 J O J Cn Q J W y wooJJo � t- J J4 w % o �� '� 3 J Z ►-+ Z 3 J o 3 o cn a i LU F- n Z Q O OLLJ LXM CIL Q g Iva � ,j mF- ODQQLW W ~ = C; LM W yL lam) S g -i Z IX I F- �. t J LLJ LL Ow I s Q0Jtn LLOOCVJ � o0�a. tWn Q J m J = F tL Ix C3 ~. Ljj mow oma = F- F- W Z -� U) 1-4 Ho Woc� � w .9 GI I IAJ LLJ0W QZ � am g ? f- Z � QZmNFW- = OP O -4 woL� cDJWC� o ►-. u� uCXEQ F- zZU-10-� �-+ : Ce- WW = W m <CWF- UC73Wt7 ,-. MfiFrG� ip C) Z w w Z \ WLLI Z CL CL J 0 O cn C � F- Zo wW OF- ( 0 °- O mmQZ o w _ LLJ t W CL FL cn cn U) Qcc Z 2 w U Lu Cn o cn w OZ w WF- O H Q LU < � cn ui v w O Q J = wz .J = �= Q 1 !� W F- CL F- F- CC m a = w¢ . oya >nM I ` o� Cn 0 W 7 0 C7 Ix W w a O YZOW WL.LjZOC� (0ILO WDsw w .J. Ox3p am f— m Z � � m mW m ¢ (, "q m w w m - cnO = U) wO r W LU i J Z ' (J7 a- L7 J Z a � d� Z W O OI— vjW ~ ZO i3 O Q 7� ZLS � W` � W a. } O W w W 72 J Z a W 0 Q : ' :> O as ►-, f— O ,, O F- J ¢ (n C7 ¢ r-ti Q m V Zs CL. ZCA Z � tn � .., t— W I No LU0O � tn YOWZ ►Oi � O d� � R' U WO CWF— Z 00 Eo ZZ � 0W QH t oN F- 1=1 — Q v a • � WZO r~i rl=- SOWI 0 <E co Ot— ,� � � � E • c ! _ of r I O 0 CA W 0 G O J ■ G W 7 \ .Z, Z W .-. .-, .... .-, J �L Q F- O im Z m W W m W O V O O CL CA LL Ln (aQ -r"` G � � s m � I W w t- F- pZCnm � O � Wa' W wpCA � W F- H C=!9 3 m m m O -J ~ UOn- Z CAW ~ LLO ~ ~ W OWO � U GW.. WCAm O � U U FW- CL W Q ?' Q � Z ~ � Y Z ULjj LLI m -iQW OQWO a0 <ECL x QJWZ LrWcr O CL w < = W ._, m U p -] x CL O� W Z ¢ ZQW Wa OOm ? WWp ►-+ t- 2C7 HAW ZmH J Z Cr Cn cn w O W CL W 90 - J O UOCAcrO OJ �J2 F- 0Hincp� �f-- e5 CL joy W3 .z-. ZZ Z - :3 1: W = W tI W L- OQ f-- W 0 � tJlS i r r Lli W w w fY >- ;z -j ¢J � O F- Cn O a. C7 � pa- Zto jP" F- Q VN � IX F- .., c w vw = Wx " w CL C7mwm JWw f— F— w m JUo N L.L C3 FQ.. .., p Q, O LLJ P" CA L F— ~ OQQO ~ 00 CD F- � F— rpW � JUIx G �, Q J � Z p F- QU) m cn S '"' CL W m C) C:j CJ .--� C.) p Q E .ZZ� W W3LL_ WS 3 W O SONO �" Ct2CA l N �a f r CD —= wQZ =_— - WpJZ �_ W W - m m Ix W - O O F- J W W -- _ LL LL W V _ i< � Cl1 NJ N Q �-- m � - W iI LU p U) I � � _ w JAN mZ ~ -� z cc o J ¢ J W W t� O Q 0 ' � Qa. W a_ � WO_ = O Lo WW ,� Y � F- � SO � '"'� ZCn � F- JW 0W Z Z W ¢ _ W O � �j � - 3 ZW -- _ Z m _ r- w x = Q W CD ►-, Q 0-4 O ZQmN "" F-- mo HZ_ }- W U W Q = W O Z In J QF-' JW I I p ¢ = a `" co cc < QF- °° �� = W6Quo coNW = aQ � �' � � v = <1 w ■ Uskr � o QQc� cn r coZmZ L) CL I Caice r O `= 3 cj • _ f LX Cn Lo I C-) o ~ m .-. C7= ilu� J co Q � N W LL z W = z W = W L .-. �. to ►-+ F- W CIO = S1 CIO W I-- W Z "" L LLJ Q 5 Q O � SnU [1jzZzF- 61 a. <1 W _jz �4 I CAS (, "' Ix "p F- LL -jm� mLLw � o i g W "" Q =3Z ¢ Q U oZ ? Cn W p N "FLo C3 W Q w Z - a ix in Ex F- W ¢ v;3) W ^ wZixF- (n t LL cn CL W L) cn -j o Is �7p M —, = -ji • •:zi5QE = xw :3 <C wGL. u. F- 0nCn3 W -- I Nt -1 WtJ� -1 _j Q Z w W w m t!: Q in U Q J F- w cancnmoZ -j L) mcn OL L J O ¢ HO � ww Q Ix co Z ¢ OJJ ¢ w Z � w � JZ r1 ; �► Z U F- - o z � 3o W w tL0 C:) � m L13 i j Si LLD LL fY ¢ (~n X W O !� ". i'ii�' ? ZZ ZZ cn F— J w I m u N4 ¢ wcn o ¢ Q F-� 0WW c7 JwWiUW II _ tYQacc Z<1 � OIX � F¢- try �- M �'� I' <20 O Q' W h-- O I I w ,: lV � � a w � x w F- U ► , a O < )I � � �I I N F- Q (7 LL. N LL n �I W W LL o rz w a cnoZwwZ ¢ - FO--- o Z o za- Zw0Q � Fn = aE-- m ¢ OtLLW � ON F C ¢ � t- xw 4 .., QQ 0 Z = c' 3C�7 F- <E `�' o = F- � Zh�- - UF- w Z O w� Z O G3 = SOC X2 = F- u- ¢ 3W O w o a Z p at � Z w J w w Q Z Z Q w A O J p C ►.. "" F- W M r t7 W Q JP- ZJ LL_ ¢ (n ... J a ~ 2 W !— � ¢ F- - Jm � o _j Caw Q. U <1 CL - � oww O � � � F" w p W , F- = U cn n ? LLwo w o � 3 ~ LLJ ¢ o ¢ F- w � Lu <r Q W pwa CL � LU < F- � LU � HOw Q_ V LO � mowf- � ¢ w o o R �- o t- F- Zw � � � ¢ Q- " � f- I- mww = mco ZN QLU =3LuOLIT cwn oNWo Zoe = wa m Q � U) O_ Y F- LL F-. F- W Q -� O Jp � O Zm L W Cn U) a" p ,., ~ z W wc� x -,0Z 11Jmcn ¢ o �vJW aiUULL- w03cn I Q tnr- 2 m o X w .., oma w A LO ¢ '-' Z ., COQ }- o - F- C30 =1 (D 3Qm ` OwOF- Qcn �3 a' W F-- f'" (L ter. �--� W U Z a' -- U " co W FLO- F.- F- "" '." :3a) W Z L= .-. .-, c!) W . J U) 10 _OF- ZZ- mJ YQ -> F- 20 F- :54 OF- JJ_ _0 - � -4 io ¢ oF ¢ w� ?m- wo4Q <1 F- o $ � JUCL. il, a (, O Q3 ¢ a (n mF- t) Wa UF- a. ocnF-- JU Q -(n WCAWJ WZWW D r W Wh- WXSJ O ¢ mWit) _J S L =3 < ~ Jm SW ) ~ W F- F- 0O0 r. F- J ~ � F- cn J -Do N W cn0c � o = � 3omo cn c!I W Y to W co U) O F- a. O S J m �--� a O N � U W � = 3 JcnF— Qw 'jmWWF- W W f 0- n• = F- O O ~ � 0- W }- F� ¢ � to ix tY O • J '" J W w w CL cn Q O = 000 3 Z � X 0 = � � `') o to Wacx c.) Z Wcn F- <r ¢ � F- W0 g o Q F' c3 cn IxwF- W - F- F- - mW }• Q �- FW- C7 cn U J W O zw mJ W 0mCXOm F- J Do W F- Z ►-� w0 JF- O~ F- ~ •.+ F- w a. O co cn; Lu LuZWZWcn pcr W ~ F- n W ct! OR Y S 9Qfl- • OW JZ < W W ix CX W QOLLF- O •-, F.•• Om SU10CLt) .., OD Qo� S %) _ Q L s S o �Q 3 n ci, 9 0 M F- LLJ z J W ... a. U 2 Q L) 7 = WZJ ¢ \\ m F- J J W W N tl. � TL� pW3 Z W 0y o ^. oZ - CD o WN F- W Q W cL W ► i J .W � Lj i . �.. ¢ oW LLm ] UO i co S� qL 0 LL. LL Q W Ix LLJ y ppF- p0 W W m .� t— U � p3 Q z z J <r _; Q W = W Z J p W owE5 o , Wr^�``(^^A tom' cn Q M ` V CL 1 w Q Z f— LL NW ry O z = n I= f Y U a U W W X Q W cl � N 23 r cl U) cr W '73 t-- WO LLJ Li- m >- 0 E o J Q W J LL Z CA ca W 3 J W .-, � Co Z � moo = U Z ~ U) Zp Z H O 3 ?- LL _• W 0 W CD = W Z NCL .. 3 J w = • F- W .Or O D = i F- Z (A GW >- w(Dxnw W (Dfj) LL0 >- O -0cm -iwI-- W W "'' •.+ ►-+ Zmm0zw -j0 = ZJOZJw 0 ZJ _1Zm � ►-+ F- O J F- P" _Q -i _Z W " I m W JW CO 00 -W z = U ,Z CL� Co . T LLCn _J MZMCAF- O w Cl) p W o w 3 CA LL. ¢ W w W to co to ¢ '7 w cn J W ~ W <C F- � W WO � ¢ WUUm WLt1J � p � Q W C -3Z - M DP O = p OU = � DQ Zsd � W =J, = Q J a- < wa. 3 F- 0 CA W W ECL F- _ a � p0 Ca U - xwC] ZG � F- U .-, = w � W = LD �W "ZWwN � p L) .,W F- w Z w F- CO LO a .. cn cm Z � w F- � ZI= Ww = ~ OOJ W = Q3 .yp (Z _j � Co Z ' O U Q = W U w = Z W Q O N CA = Ln O a Z F- „J� ¢ n' LLF- mLZLLwmq o W � 3F- m -i Q � p = LLJ W O a O -i W co r W C:3 _ � .. CA CA Q J = J O ' -� O p p mcr ) J J = W " Z 3 CA CA � x F" m C9 O J W O J .' 2 '"'' Ow JZW C7 P " LM ZO = O Zr CA Q F- UD Lo -JQF' pWZp .., Q w p wJ Q � WXF- F- X LL. W Z4pW - 0 Cl) = � (nw Wad- 3 ►-. WZLO oo ¢ F- m = oN 3 >- O Cr J F- W WZO o0 DU' xZ � oQ � - ZW ZQ � tJ� = L- m � WU � ? Z ¢ wW0 LLI .-, F- YO wOp �--� JmJ � JUm -� � � 0 Nom = ZOO •-+ mJ C3.. J = ::Imw J Z = QF- C7 Q U = CAWWQOg0 � JUOOJi-- � W F- W (p .-. �ca. aLW -i C3 L) =naL CL � 3o3ro_ CD ZWF=- U) m3 ¢ mm s • 00 W -- - J } J � O W Q 1D t aO!_ _ V O � V• Q Z Z W (1) - >- H i _- N W H WLL: ZO OJ J wOa W 3 w C7OCDJ C) OCH HJ vo m Owf-- cnZ_ t- Z � _icn W O � '"" C? OW (fy � WU >- ZOO .Jpd. W W 4' QZQ � Q ~ z � WOQ ,.., W � W � �mLu W ,. < x to � LU = vj = fl0 O W O F" uj F- to ►--4 W W O Cl Q --� � Ln Z �- r/ W �--� Z (ly �- (n J S J, m h- m , � S r Cl Z W C!) B O J W = p O U N a- C) ULL ~ O = � Q Q2Ln -j _j _jU � I" ~ WO ~ UF- � Cr; Um W ao W �-+ ZQ W Lo F- Q C:j W F- m = = m P" .�. JCL ixOW -J wWJ J¢ OU B." z ¢ D), -j QF- in ZoW 3 WF- CLC� > F- ►'~ ► " w Z OWQ = W -i In F- W w JS ¢ - mp F- Cl J J Q W Q W w O m U LL L.) --4 F- L) LL m < - CZD, u7 CC3 w = � CnQ QwZ ? O W "" Z ,." LL F- Ci W ,.., W <L J = - F- <E YZW c� � x � � ¢ mm c� M� Q F- Z 0 p O IM F- 7 O ` U X O J o = W Cn }_ CL W ? Cn � � F- O ' ? O JUUZUZZ � QO O WOD OW0a. ¢ OF Q Q � CnC�S F- W W C7 J F- Z J Q J {nm 0 ►-� WCQZO QWO = QtYUO 0 � 02W W iW < ix <[ < Cn _1mm F- Q. CLCnF-- mmQF- h- uiU) 3ai W • - r tu .j _. h- N i— W V � W Q tQ Q V O OC V. Q Z Z W y } H _ ' W F- WLs6Z0 OJ J -pp LL3 LoC) CJJ Z 0-4 }-� ¢ L)IC (n LLJ O � Z W Z Z Z CA pqx "' C.) OW O : WU }- •-• � O JOCL. W W � � ~ � Q �L.L <[ ~ Z COQ ►-` � C .• Wm� mLJ �, U <I: a: � W � F- pOLLJ WZpO ZZ) ~ MMCn OCL .CD ~-+ W ~ O co WE Lo LU _ ~ M ., = ♦/'1 p V •-• `p S O Q Q O •--� J U " W U H - U O LLIU. •-+ Z Q LU Q O ¢ W CA W <C J pC:) mp '" Q = tY ?- W tYOW JJ ..WJ J � F— .--. W ci J � 4- ►~ice QF- QmOOLL U- LLJ ^J >- F- W --� (� 7p 3 P" � - W .-. Q � Z m Z = Q <1W JJ �L pIxF- W mJ = J ~' O E _ Cl _j _j <I: W4Wi = 0mUIiUY F_ LLim 2 ~ Z -jU:) 0 <IW � CKCn <r QwZZ Q T O W Z .-. U_ F- C7 LU �-, W � 4 -. Co J S � WF-<EL Zzw CD X > jQ � U CLZ QHp LL -inz w ¢ ~� _Z QVZOOO 001-. CO OZUIX0 _j LO U) a. W '" U WZ MZ CAJ ? OJUC.� ZUZz (x <E O WpC> = W0CL. : ¢ OF- < <= W co C7 F- W W IX to J F- ZJQ J CAmzp .-. Q Wa. Z = QW = SQCCUO = 0O2 W W Q7-s W Qtr ¢ mQCA _Jmm - a. aCAF- m m4XF- F- CnU) Jp Y O 0 z d rn - 0 -�� CC .A ►`„ S L C f+ { C H CD O aJ co CL 0 = S c CIO ca << F CL N /I ' r w Q F- LU IZ LL CO F- F- W W F- Z o 0 F- W CL z CA LLJ 0 = W J0 + Z2 = Z wU-) F- Z Q02 � OF- W W Cm W " F- < M = - F- F- 3oF- w� mH E � H a to Q o LL •+ H p w Z = F- W w = CA J U w LL W = F- >- L,) " CA LL O J w J U ¢ . W p O w W CA -� Q .-+ a O 30ZZ W � O � L,t7 +' ' = "� F- Z = Q � JCL U 0 Z F,_ F- "' Lt L.L CC p LLJ CCW m O O ►-� F- F.- O W Q al W Z r-. <1 =3 O W W U CDQ � � CL ZpQ F- ptfip O Q WZa- —� w O J GZ "' W W p � � 0 ����'''' p WLu p GF_ = QZm V >. -j � OZF=- F=- � m ¢ Q ~ � _ � � U a. CC Cl ~ O '-SCA = � N Cl F- C3 <r 7 ~ wZ � Q ^ = W W � .-, Q z%weFr = Z w GL CA CA ? LL C� O Z W F— wa. w cn Q W F- OCC2CL C, JLLm0O oZ '-' = i W U wF- p Zp W < 'JOUwCC LL Qp w cn _ .--� Wm JW FQ- CC Z F- U W O CC 4 CO Z W " .•, ?- CDF- J O .� Z = � O � OpF- O Co F- p Jr� co co CL z m CL 0 F- w o F- W w LL J .-, •-• - a U- L L .-, •-• WF-. U JZU J F- = J (A ui ?� Q0U) F-- Jp ,r W W oZ X50 w � 0 3 Q W ? >- F- ?- oc= J w wLoF- C3 •-. o "" w U L U F- Z � J = � 4L o mZ � s CCw � J w 7 w Z O U) Lo OJ " 0 OOOtY ¢ JO0 }- wF- = W (A LL J J W P" LL J = _J F- LL W LL W J J W :> _J Q Q U J F- a. U7 0 W Q U •- I O F- F- W F- 0 �4 < + F- Q ?- W O � Z O ?- w0 S a= te 000 = O .-• SOZWF- � LLO J O p Z F- 0 CC F- CA Q O F- a= Z m F- CC J to m •-y = CAU .-, •--� U v v v O N � s L---j �' 7E '�: r--� �- L� lam. _ = O LLJ F-- _ F- F- z I— F- Q LTJ I J Q -� Z 4 Z LLJ F=- � Cui U W p = p w 1 OW F- [�1 � - - [f1ZdcoLL <[ J �L 3 LL tM Cr) Qp 0E- 2 S { F- 0 OL 0w _ vQ � }H-- Ll- ON �® w o cc C3 o } ZCL �• • 0 W 00 = p m L) L1J F- M r N. 4- F- LLI L-LJ - F- ww OmF'- = ¢ >- O JWGQ W uj in == - CO10 Z Q W ZJ --> LL o F- n ZxwJ fl1Z [.tILL .-, CO CL J .-. W < Q 0 3s - 0 OL F- r O UN W O J LU .-. Q W S -- -- Ln ¢ = J O tl. ►-� GL X F- W = F- W O l .-. O NLU _ per SF_ = W r. WV ] UF- ® O LL W O O ~ LL � Z3 � zOO OWQF- F- pF- ~ -J _j Q J � LX � — pJ O = w CL U W ~ - m Q V ! J W W W ~ - - LL m U] W ..W J _ ' `- ' ' �--� Z W W Cn LL Cn F- ` W W , LJ I F- O F- W H J U = F- � F- L) n Z � Z F- U) WJ w ' W d O t� �y ¢ W O O 0 W LL O CJ Q V O a. ucr- F- S a. Zo J t 0 Dc� 7C -• .. r- o -CCc.. nDvZ = C .... omvmmc � 3D Znp "U 3D (n co :E -Z0 0 -4Zrv ~I mm ? voD Dv 3c z coi) C' cnOm -< mmDm DDO 3m -4 m - rrC o o = - v 6-4 z D DDS_ to 3 Zrr m Z ro m Z � D � = t� C3 cn vac) rnZ 3 c) v 6-4 D � � N -� com m oc ;u Dmam mm o � mom o �_ c pzq D -4 = cmr� c_ my DC = m a) C-) cnWccnno u, omZovr 00 r i Z .. ti) .� � _ -n c-) Z z = M ..., � �nv c m c� n n m D -� D -4 Z -i -� O 1 .moo QUO o m -I .� m � � v -4Dcon cD o -fl v � dr- co � m -4 � mr r to ,_, oZct� = Z ua D m -i £ ca MZ 3 0 � om ... omOZm �-- -f Z -I m m m = Z co I --q ;o= Z U) = D D m v n D mm 1> m a) D m � m o -I -4 C-) -4c-) Dm ;qn Zr cn -C -C ;u C) mvm om • Z -< -ID N N i Cf) I i f' 9 _ t -3 ixU- z (n -WnIx (n ' = C7p [II = 00 �-+ U' U) = W wF' O Z F- Z Z O F- LL Z w cn = Z !Y +-+ _ X03 E ►-+ Q ¢ OO W LL. 3 W Z W }- Q Z W CL Lo J W -LU j =) E F- ti .-. �--� W U)nCL W 0- >- � � ? WF- Wm2 O � Om Q O O U 0 ° W m � � Z Uj ) n Z --1 Q 2 J W O •- W X 2 "" - W = � Q LLJ W LU ¢ O � - � W F- = W � ~ � Q Lo :>= p Uw to A Z 3 F- COCZ LD oZ W ; Oo ...1 Z O_ W "� y J F- G 11J <r uj cn CLH J o O 2 - W O W p .-. UWS Wpm �, F- OO xU Cn m - .j,) CO W = F- O O •-+ J J Lo Z F' U 2' J co "'' -j ujZ - 2 0►-+ _Z � w J O ZpZ LL � CaZ �. sC13 ~ � ce- Jt1 p Z .JQF- WUJW O �' ili F- ~ � � 2 � UfYh- OW = W Z � = moo � � 2 = = = y LZOX -i = cn mW � � Qm = � m3cn0 <IL� w 3F- Q I U W J Cn Q- - _ i TMI ` ISI ` - _�IIIII I - 71i r_.• wo w wocnZ = F- cof- m w C] � F- 3 ¢ Hq ¢ 0a. m ¢ Z s O Ww �--� w ►-� � ZX 0 � � 0 _j � N F. 3 W 2 a W F- w w w Z_ CL F- _J oF- •-• •.• ate O � � � P :5F >' 3Zwo IX C3 aXZ = wm '� 3 W ; ma. w c� .., wo L) cn F- J a P" Ix a v o m Z ... a a m oz c� <Iw � 1 � F- w W � 2 F- QIco Z DO 0J0 w � m . , Q � "� W cj a Z w ..� Z 2 -� O w LL Cn Z J ZU' Q 0 r-, cn a �L 0 O O _•• ' w w LL co w = W O J (A C� U w 0 0 = F- F- -~s w rY Z 0 - O V = Ch W w O o cn �. ZCD CD � F' <E >- � � O � = OCAO ~ Li a W Z L ... w ,_, F- �' O W Cn ZCX Cn Cn = O � � (DWX aO � WJ � U •• Jcocx OpW � ` QOF- Oa O � " O J r ,.� 00 W xw = 2S � O � N Z � oOS _p-� mC!) I-- � aD U � cs Z W Z> CO F- m N� O CL Z N cn = w I ►-, 0 0 0 F- m z -i a u w W W V = LL ¢ J J Q t j C3 Z W W Z3 �nx Zit- QF- W cn ou) man, G] LO W I' O -�p ••�- Vl I C 2oUIW W CrJF. 00 � Ct� 2 O F- wQ2 W LL ' W oF- 3m 5F" Gm p � J tY (D W = W W U7 Q w J LL Q = W = = Q = O W L L J � m U) I m OF- w = W = OV -J -• O (n F- (A Q W Wu (n I LL (A Cn �--� O :c•-. .-, Cl: LLJ 0 ¢ IXlx WR= OOg0OD - - _ O ix 2E _ to p H O p -j J = Z F- Wow cnZ3 � 0~ . W o O W O � WNLUmcn -- 1 _ = t7 J J F-• w <r � QZQdOW zQirO � W Q3 Im <tOQtea. = a)5- CL Xz T) p ZW xLL (x _J 4= � QF-- 0m000J Wcn �' � v tn �1F- ? Wm �. O O W -zm CD W Z Q 3 Q WLo � J V [► F- = W W O O C (n F- F-. O U p W W V W ixof' LLr� - n ~' WWW0 J r-. W LL L- F- J O Y U- LL a: w <EU') Qpin (n E I M W w W W Cx OMEnJO �O to tLA_ Z O LJ I _ W JO � � Op _ �? O ¢ F- LL O Z J J w O � w CL J F- So W W .-. F- J LL ? N �J. OzCoOU wWWm � Co W pJN -s N Q F- W M - ® a J LL r%j U � F- wpZJ Q .a www LLJ U O w M ¢ _ \ F- CL (Z7 O O ¢ _ W w Q CL w Co W W F- . F- J LLQ QJLO wL) _J - O ZA O <1 OJa � W � = O V � G = OC'� t- }. = QUI- Om � N •r Z ZO � � � LL � co Lo P" CLJam. Q o � W F- W Z V, � ¢ oa Z~ O .r �.. Z~ Lo a- Lu ►-• --iZ Q •o J to F- Z j c OUOnw aJ C7 (n �+ -i C3 aJ0W I JwW (OJ I JON .-. W M CL I OZ ¢ F- OSJ W wd0CDtL' Zo aF- WF- JZW to WZO F- LJJ n0 L) a_ WCLO F- � WU) i m w » w cn U ,..� a w O CL 10 a) w C� XU -i -JP" P" F- O Q � UW Lu J --1 Z F- x � ¢ W ?- F- n LL Q '1OZ a- OCn ¢ � ww0: LOF_ J3U = E" W .Z� f ..WJUJO W9O � O O � U (nm < <r = (J HCo = npi Ug0 W n (0 ¢ (J1QaF- Z Zax O �"" �YJ P" 3 w ¢ .. w ,., 2 J O W CrF- Z _j 0 < uiz ON¢ U `LiJ Cf a: = 9 0: � W0 OQF-- CoOE2: Q' LL. CnC.� •,, UOwWCL WQO ¢ Co JJww :3 cr3 :3 '-' Q Z X S W w F- O z ''' J W W O j Q A- t-" W F-- tY W �--+ = F- U �-+ •-. L �L 0 O ui 0 Co U CL Ix CL = J F- W J W W W U W •-, X U F-+ tY F- F- O • WSO - ti- .-, UOWP-4 • WXIx (3 coEF' im F• aU_ < M0 OCOWLL. W i .l V C4 Q. = o a .. la fO j vi wusi Lid°y W Z G) iA LL. F- C W W f- cn ^W U) tm Z I J .-•. 0 ¢ O r. CC! = r•t F- U) = % W (D ¢ Z F" CLO (DJ' C O � 3 LO U) Z � wZ2 J = = BOO .- CL ,� W J }-- U) W p ¢ � ig u7QF- � J = Oo m .-. w3 J = 3 = w oW (JF- LO ww m 3 L) ( ^J n WF=- ww [!) O 0 O U) ►-. W = mc W WF- JF. wZ = = W � 0 W � F- t7OCD <T Lu >- JW = LLIw NZ ::, -jCC U) -� V ~ 1: W O Z J ¢ U CA uj ¢¢ WCAm ^� �YF- � LL ^I 2 � Z �-- N � w � W � Nw ocr� cnooF- - = OF- O � q WZ ~ ZO LLJ =, � Ix x V iza: mWU) wwZ z UF- "21 0JF- U.0 ¢ � -� woo C) IT rcwJ WOW (' J ZU) ¢ ZU) ~ ♦� WOU) � WIx w0 ¢ F=. [JZZ <E = ¢ O CL ACL _) 0:: C-) 2 • ZCL' CC • OLAO ~ W ` oU) .-, Z = VZOCLm • ►-+ W SCC U) ¢ <[ P" QL m41F- CL UJCCmCL L] vLLJ LL •• Iltl ton Till ,.1111 � u.�1 al"q u�t�N� n.�l• ,,�nu:r�fro�gith L .. . . m cm rn LL Z LL- LLJ LL =r� i r a nnunm,tnu umnmau I}I', t+I rt 1 _ 1 • 1 < `.`, . i ��.. +_, `" ( C - maZC-) wowD m --q Q� a C13 I r rte- Z Co � Drm D � ! v ,,,, ►-gym -10 mr03> m NM ., (n Zncrr- � � Dtn � m � Z ( , ccnna7m � v3 = mTia v j Cl) c� DDr m = -4Zor- � oZo vmicnZ m� '� o Z -4 -qr rn i d a � � D r—0 C05 =C Dr r rn 30 rn r }, M czi� cn3aZ = o °r° oc�aNc mC omoz cn m m o M co rn rmD � � 0 � � vC C C � � Cnm Dm -� m v C O � Z CO 6.4 D r ; Z t cn Z � m %k � � Cl) ;a C -0m ;D � Dr' Z � c-yv \. m � m -4 r- Zaitor- m -1z C m D --i z r- v M- Cl) -a o v .� rn 0 Aly� rn l \lIT c/ f% =� I , z J z N � � 0 Oa Z Z / cn L� [!� W W O-im wmz W - W F— 0 0 •• •• • p •• LLJ Z = W QI-- = q. .L HOZ ¢ � = tA � CL >- LLI F- � r W = -' = U- cnSWO � O 0 ~ }_ � V pF— mOQLL Zuxinj— ~ O CL C3 Ix U = 0 = m •-+ � Z = F— pW NUj Q ' Q Cf LL Q iA CO LU LU W to U) F O W m Q C] W a � W z = = F=- � � 30 � Q0 V u. Q w � � F- cnp � W � zZWw a- � w �n cn mo w ►- F-- F ~ :.j -j am ZZ a- <E 2 � Z OpsU Om .-. F O VF UIO �- LL. Wpm J tizDO '_ Z W U' 9--• W Cn OZ „ ZQQ 0 = CtIZ'Q � W 0 OSS O W = W ~' W W Z ~ ¢ O Z C) C:) - clm W W F' Cnu. � Q WLi' = c3Ct, wm Q p W � O O C:D U (!! m Z O O] w F. tt1 O ., O 0 Lij Lr) Lu F- �,,. —i O LL Cl z Q Zwu � LL o � ¢ w3Qj.- w oOIWF- W � - F- w �-- � wocn � � w CLz5� °D `Y <r a Z ZO UJ F- N a. f- FW- Q � � -� - � L) Q U F-- O W L) W m W W J ►-+ z • � z W F— p W W CC a. O w = LL O F— C ~ Z >- (X 0- W WIXZ = m .JZ = 9U QO Q F- OL mW3CL F- Q u xwuQp r g r� I W OZOtnW Q� d Cf1 - O Cn Zwmwzw ¢ Ww_ U Z aQ �--+ W aw a- WF- J ` CL� OF- Z �Ch-- O W OOHOW W" o w ¢ a � o .., owo ¢ - cn 3cn "ju- � o ~ °° ,., +� o a Lr) !`� oacmna' MLL� nza- ;S F- >- Ow w : > Na Zv ¢ ¢ cro o � � w02 z NJ �t' w "' ,.., F- O Oa. OS00 � (n Uw Ow O a . O W S � OPLL ¢ USO wtn � 0 W Ww mF-(j LLJ _jWF_ W C.r) trj •-, O ~ ¢ U W OOU coUWU � +S � -j "" 0 ¢ N JUQ P" z aW S F- W0: U ¢ W-. ¢ � = 00 ¢ U ►-. cncnZ '-' Z w u�i ~ tna: ZZc�im ap � c � o ova ¢ ` .-, o L-1 0� O F- W W In 4 J W W = w U x F- W _J m in Q Z O F- Z F- Z -- J CO = O •--� a cL p F- v W "' Z W � (lJ ,.., "� W = za CnW w � 0 w F- LL' LL � OW � S •-� U') _j <[ cl O ¢ � F- ZO J J D. O U o z � Jtn CZ ¢ • ,.., a. U 3 0 0 ZO W O",_JO in C3 Wim � W JOWa = xW WOW 1••� w Cn ¢ OO � W CX W W w OF- J SO � � Z Z Lu ,� F- cD ce o cn 0 ! Z a ¢ c� O F- F- � � W CU.� x ZZUW ~ coC.0 U O ►`iwU) w ~ � Z CO F. ;t-, I- � zz O ... OW O Z OW C.0C UJ `" (n F- - CL ow � U � ZFw - = QF- o Z aJ <i OO W LLia- W ~ O QW ¢ 3 V 3LDZa_ � .7 ? F- JS O ~ F-- W UO n- _J Qa .-. Zw (.0cn Cl - O Cn 3 Cn y LU a. cn o do F- J T F- W Z Z F- o LL! �~ J O � DW W ¢ SAWS 1=- Utn F- Nwr, = pW � � Y W V OJF- Oo ZD' UQ. F- WIXF- G wix w W wuwwum LL' s -� � O ¢ © QUwi3 � w3 0F=- to+- m ¢ L) CL (nnCL � ao ~ w = z W Z X Z 00 =: w , I- O F- CDUCnrj N LU Pp�Ha O W Q z r W M �! x. 0 U] O LL F- in fnt - lz W C] lYOCnJ (nEnwSZ `, ' � QoCl � � V H = q � oZCO p Wt- x cn V 0F- 0 LU Q CL 2 Q Z .. w J W F- «-� Uo ` q Z mcn _ � v' ~ ' QZ F- i q a. <rp, ( J - qO � W r1) OUJ = wWq >- � W0Mggq J om C-0—j (L = w � cn O J .J - J (� Z Z CL C7Jw qo Z = ZOZWO W ZQoo ¢ U � � 3CL p Lo = U o m m 3 o W Q Q = F- Z W O m to m �-+ J LL m 3 L) wo F- � � Q p LtW r J D p f- W Z W 4- LU Lo LL WUZCLOUZ Q J W O �, 3 W L7 L1 O q •--� Z O F- CL ggUvcnW .-, � r �.. Z G J = W W U U i' w o O O Z LL LL W7- 1 W W 1' U WOL1. - . '� -j7 i t i i Ul � tl-n :3W ¢ U) } La Lo •• w0 } �:GtnW F- F- F- < LL. 0t- ZF- � r-. � � � Lu Z ¢ W .-. .-• 0 C30ZOJ � O ?_ JZ JCz = J � -jILLf" N00 +_ t� W =:I C3 Cr 2E 0 F- ¢ LL0F- WO 0 0mNC11 O � CnW W = Cf) L.) to W "� CnOCn = � LLQZ cl 0U Glz .,oma L) Z O � � w Cl Q O Cf) J ¢ 1 LL F- ¢ GF- WJ •�dW � Q J ►"' W V S ,., g S F- LL. Cn Z �- O W Lr- F. W C!7 W F.. _ � _ W 0 Z� W F- W V ¢ Q a- CL ►-+ Lu M C) LL! � W WLU -i 0 F- CL' C7 " , :moi X F' en W C3 F- W p W Cr p ¢ ZZtn J ¢ W •-• , a_ F- ¢ WLL. J JVF-- F- ¢ x. 30 = in = `< W W •-, a- F- LL C� NIX 0 � Owl co �W � ¢ L•� W iz LL-WO p W Z ¢ � Jo 3c � Cn � � CnW -jwaa,. WN 'AFF- (�S W Q w p >- cn 00 -Ji' m � � ,.., 0 = 3 l n W F- Z p-" cm 4 ¢ [L LU ~ p ¢ pp ¢ w -im0 = ct: -iJW WF- .J ZV � Z ¢ --� J � "' Wf, ¢ WCX0O JD i E ��� .,.. x= ���� �� 4 ��.` .. - ilh i in� �}� � pp " �� �� A _ �� t� V\\ ��' � t 'f u-i ���� � e t ±�1 y( e - , \ , �, 4�� � ►• x.J fit" • : \ A 4 �.,�..a � ��t�` i �., v v � �� � �� �� �4� � .i,. � ���. .�� .�e yr •s J;��..+i'u!�� �•% � J !. '-t. 4� Y`��„�, "^Ri- � � 1�` rr�F4 � A �� ����,� r;; •, '1 �'' `� �, � z�. \ � y -h; �r ~ �.� 7. a_•-> �. i >-�_�. �� ' 2 � "; �i - ' �Y `��,- � � .. ��.�'$ A �' £�,;a - _ . • i + y F d G n t � t 1i 4 n'� •.j'� Z CAGSJ . : t J U- CL' S W WCL' ► { s,; ', O W F— ¢ JOW C.� GCnOCD U 0 ►-+ 02 O LL i � 1 ja) !— OCC h— Cn W Ok O F ' W �' V" J O W ¢ 0 CAOw OW � WWCAir Q OCC ""4 ~' W = wCnCA � VV S kat co 0 O OCA2 W ¢ O O J u �j Aix Ix CL J 1 (jOWFZ O W � � CD �i W Q Z F-- 2 ►-� --1 t`- H ¢ m � `� 3J Zvf-- O Z ¢ w w w to 0. NwQ C:) F- ¢ F' � w cn O a O CL = LO 3 W M C7 W H F— Z W � Cr Y. � O ¢ O ~' V '� U W W } V _ hw C5 _ ¢ O F_ O <CW ¢ '-' . ¢ (nO cn � JO ¢ CC1 U J LL ¢ JO ►-AZO J C rn U- -Cj) C3 O tAoonww ¢ w30 . F- � Z � O Z �-" "7 rZy F- � ¢ W CL ■ pOCnO OV U) nL) cr 0 ¢ (nnwa: cL mm ¢ cwn 0 <E :> CL PON CO OWYD O [ wW LL F- a ZO CL -j0 - -i J Z � WOQQ 0wlz - 0 wC) z - <1ZLOQ J OJ • ¢ r 0*-, --i a- F- `� �C21 � o F- CD J F—X F- � 2 Z JwCn inO ~' W LU Z inW (M '-" in LO Oi� W w = W Q O W E F- X W F- O F- Z -s em_ �- i.3 F- � N ~ F- W p a- Q D u Z W co W CWJ� W Z a. ' d Q ' Q L I •�. IM p '"w F- Q Q W �" O Z O !wi W tWf] Z Q ~ U W Q u J O F- S JLAJ f Q u Q3Z W LJuZ � hn = wQ _! -J U = LL p Q J Q V) Z w 0 Q] F- LL Q O Fes- W WZ J V D = O N Q Cl LL m LL U CO twitlz '- ' FF- -i t i Q V Lu W to I � Q ~ Ix w Z o 1 "" Z W <� i_7 0 m O U Q W m co Z¢ J O `- V W YOLLj F- � F- = LU Lu Cl� Zp � ~ O _jn J UI- � C.� Q U _ .-. W W Z w W ���J .-. U W 0 Lij � 7 F� � w LX W W i' w � its Z O CL Z W _jC13Q � Q' wZm fQ_ = ~ TIO- W2 F- T 00 Cl _j Q W W = �l J F=� 1 V c = f- wNJwF- LL = J IL www ~ Fw- J wC3 � ¢ � W3 W = = � w ¢ t� Q = = = t . z = °° 3LrZ -i °' o F- LL w al W Z V t' !-- h- O W i1) F- _a W -� F W wU') OS >- VO ~ Ow (nWw QO UQ W -Z Cn FDwWZZ _ c xwWit? • Q U fl Ld LJ J 1,1 III Ift 1 17. ui I. C -TI IT i ui w ljj 3: L 11i C L ,Ti C QY 0 I'D 0 -11 f-6 L L) 1.TI --, T -1: 1.L (nw - COZ (OWLJ- >- o a >- 0 0 D. F- — c n � 0 Z _j W ., _j W w FEW w W Z W < <r w (fj C z Z =) U a z o LLJ W w ui (.rj lu- -j W W 0 L-L w WW — OCF- a- L.) z F- w z 0 <: LLI Z 'L w w L) L zo ., O -j w -J =, L) =: zm U) U) LLQ 1--.1 Z u =1 a W ,- a LL 4c W L) Z <r 0 cr (n 0 0) , . :D m (n u < F-- 0 F- W :> LL UJ CO >- 0 Q -j w M Wz z x m X LL Z <: <r z W 4T In m J<a1 <r o z ZC 0 F-LL LLJ 0 Q� LL X F- (n 0 CO" C) z LL O UUP -j LL w w M z 0 -j <r () 41 z M <1 o U- :D L) <[ m LLJ m 0 LLJ �- "1 X-. f x ce- u F- 0 1- <I w z P-4 .1 y ZJ QJ �- co CL 0 =1 m F- w W m w w -j o y <1 z U U- u w UL CL a W m —"-, 3 z Ix " F- WF- 0 <1 Lo 0- Z> 3 a LIJ W LL F- F- P-4 z cr- Lo Z ix Z w P-4 1-4 2: W LLJ - F- CL <1 CL - 3: Z -1 0 W � Lj7 > L) 0 LU F- n a 7- 0 - <1 D 11 =1 CL M z 2: z F- Z R w0 Ld w Qx0 <1 a Q -j 7 L) CL o C L) 33 acv w C) 0.. ^ Oz ^ wwln ; M i WW ¢ � 0 X W 0: < O OD � Z 1 OW W � WJE ~¢ 4+ W a a- a O U F- ¢ U d 0 z z LL to �-+ i!J ►•• LL �y z Q t'3 N 0 ¢ ^��y ¢ �y ►- z x x LL (n ¢ OD Z F- �J 0 �-- 0 r A .. aw CKZ Z ¢ ¢ ? W ¢ U- W WJ � u ''' J Z a J � x tnLL 0, ¢ U U W ¢ w � W ¢ ¢ W w --+ tl 0 ^ LL a 0 a xOO arXLL \ O0 0O w OwZ o ¢ Owe Lr) d UZ < (a 6-4 XW -Jce x w J \ Z x a ¢ 0 0 0 ¢ Ix = aWL) QZ >-LL �'- zcmry - W � o � � �" U XcnV-- JIx 0 x O w w J " ¢ o F- 0, W F- 0% W x * CMZ * o- UU UNC -. Z W Y Jr� x -..J ^ z ¢ z ^ Z Lo O ¢ � � � i= UJB z ..., � tY 70 W w mLr) z z f- F- cn 0� F- m o. p � tll ¢ rjW W Zm OQo CY) wr.J a. 0 � Z .., a JOUR Z W Z W L � ¢ = a u a W � W , � Z � Z- � <.r / ♦ Jx WIX (n Lr) - xZo Zx0 Z � tY W J G V W ¢ 0W00 -JF_ �?' < qr �-+ WLL <IF- W W <I � Z a ^ L) 3 ZN U) Cf) as � m o ¢ -• W a J 01- J J w LL W mW U) j � W � DDU 00z U ¢ � cc OZ U � � w CLQ F- mm w HW W ¢ Z F- F-- W O V zL) 'MM-' zr /�) z a W L� W v LL Z P" ¢ J X w m x V J O F- r- 0 ^ w LL aj0 ¢ zU CZ' CL 0 ~ 0o W W Y 0U ~ W W W cn ' W Z 0 " F- � 2 cn �+ F- F- U 0 W " > F- M i- t1 Co in J .J U •-• J w w O O <S F- Z Y. W ''' W00 WOwcI tY0 ¢ I- (X .-. Wt1 aU * w ¢ aZaU * JU * U) U) a2U UXrj) sic f P DROUGHT TOLERANT PLANTS FOR ATASCADERO LARGE TREES 40 feet and higher Acacia decurrens . . . . . Green Wattle Acacia melanoxylon Blackwood Acacia Cedrus atlantica . . . . . Atlas Cedar Ceratonia siliqua . . . . . Carob Tree Eucalyptus leucoxylon . . . . . White Ironbark Grevillea robusta . . . . Silk Oak Lithocarpus densiflorus . . . . . Tanbark Oak Pinus canariensis . . . . . Canary Island Pine Pinus halepensis . . . . . Aleppo Pine Pinus radiata . . . . . Monterey Pine Pinus pinea . . . . . Italian Stone Pine Pinus sabiniana . . . . . Digger Pine Quercus agrifolia . . . . . Coast Live Oak Quercus chrysolepis . . . . . Canyon Live Oak Quercus douglasii . . . . . Blue Oak Quercus ilex . . . . . Holly Oak Robinia pseudoacacia . . . . . Black Locust Zelkova serrata . . . . . Sawleaf Zelkova MEDIUM TREES 25-40 feet Acacia baileyana . . . . . Bailey Acacia Ailanthus altissima . . . . . Tree-of-Heaven Albizia julibrissin . . . . . Silk Tree Eucalyptus sideroxylon Red Ironbark Juglans species . . . . . Walnut Olea europaea . . . . . Olive Prunus caroliniana . . . . . Carolina Laurel Cherry Quercus chrysolepis . . . . . Canyon Live Oak Quercus ilex . . . . . Holly Oak Sambucus species . . . . . Elderberry Zelkova serrata Sawleaf Zelkova DROUGHT TOLERANT PLANTS FOR ATASCADERO SMALL TREES 15-25 feet Aesculus californica . . . . . California Buckeye Arbutus unedo . . . . . Strawberry Tree Callistemon citrinus . . . . . Lemon Bottlebrush Callistemon rigidus . . . . . Stiff Bottlebrush Ceanothus arboreus . . . . . Feltleaf Ceanothus Cercis occidentalis . . . . . Western Redbud Eriobotrya deflexa . . . . . Bronze Loquat Fremontodendron species . . . . . Flannel Bush Heteromeles arbutifolia . . . . . Toyon Lagerstroemia indica . . . . . Crape Myrtle Photinia serrulata . . . . . Chinese Photinia Punica granatum . . . . . Pomergranate Quercus dumosa . . . . . Scrub Oak Rhamnus alaternus . . . . . Italian Buckthorn Sambucus species . . . . . Elderberry Schinus terebinthifouius . . . . . Brazilian Pepper Tree DROUGHT TOLERANT PLANTS FOR ATASCADERO LARGE SHRUBS 10-18 feet Acacia baileyana . . . . . Bailey Acacia Acacia b. 'Purpurea. . . . . .Purple-Leaf Acacia Acacia decurrens . . . . . Green Wattle Acacia d. dealbata . . . . . Silver Wattle Adenostoma sparsifolium . . . . . Red Shanks Aesculus californica California Buckeye Arbutus menziesii . . . . . Madrone Arbutus unedo . . . . . Strawberry Tree Arctostaphylos glauca . . . . . Bigberry Manzanita Arctostaplylos manzanita . . . . . Common Manzanita Baccharis viminea Mulefat Calliandra tweedii . Trinidad Flame Bush Callistemon citrinus Lemon Bottlebrush Ceanothus arboreus Feltleaf Ceanothus Ceanothus crassifoius . . . . . Hoary-Leaf Ceanothus Ceanothus cyaneus . . . . . San Diego Ceanothus Ceanothus impressus Santa Barbara Ceanothus Ceanothus ' Frosty Blue' Ceanothus ' Ray Hartman' Ceanothus ' Sierra Blue ' Cercis occidentalis . . . . . Western Redbud Cercocarpus species . . . . . Mountain Mahogany Comarostaphylis diversifolia . . . . . Summer Holly Cotoneaster lactus . . . . . Red Clusterberry Dendromecon harfordii . . . . . Island Bush Poppy Dodonaea viscose . . . . . Hopseed Bush Elaeagnus pungens . . . . . Silverberry Eriobotrya deflexa . . . . . Bronze Loquat Eriobotrya japonica . . . . . Loquat Eucalyptus macrocarpa . . . . . Desert Malee Eucalyptus niphophila . . . . . Snow Gum LARGE SHRUBS 10-18 feet continued Feijoa sellowiana . . . . . Pineapple Guava Fremontodendron species . . . . . Flannel Bush Heteromeles arbutifolia . . . . . Toyon Jasminum humile . . . . . Italian Jasmine Juniperus species . . . . . Juniper Laurus nobilis . . . . . Sweet Bay Lithocarpus densiflorus . . . . . Tanbark Oak Mahonia higginsae . . . . . Nerium oleander . . . . . Oleander Photinia fraseri . . . . . Photinia serrulata . . . . . Chinese Photinia Plumbago auriculata . . . . . Cape Plumbago Prunus species . . . . . Prunus Psidium guajava . . . . . Guava Punica granatum . . . . . Pomegranate Pyracantha species . . . . . Firethorn Quercus chrysolepis . . . . . Canyon Live Oak Quercus dumosa . . . . . Scrub Oak Rhamnus alaternus . . . . . Italian Buchthorn Rhamnus californica . . . . . California Coffeeberry Rhus integrifolia . . . . . . Lemonade berry Rhus ov to . . . . . Sugar Bush Sambuc:- species. . . . . Elderberry Schinus ;.elle . . . . . California Pepper Schinus terebinthifolius . . . . . Brazilian Pepper Tree Tecomaria capensis . . . . . Cape Honeysuckle Xylosma congestum . . . . . Shiny Xylosma DROUGHT TOLERANT PLANTS FOR ATASCADERO MEDIUM SHRUBS 5-10 feet Arbutus unedo ' Compacta' . . . . Dwarf Strawberry Tree Arctostaphylosdensiflora ' Harmony' Arctostaphylos densiflora ' Howard McMinn' Arctostaplylos franciscana Artemisia tridentata . . . . . Big Basin Sagebrush Atriplex canescens . . . . . Four-Wing Saltbush Atriplex lentiformis . . . . . Quail Bush Baccharis pilularis consanguinea . . . . . Coyote Brush Baccharis viminea . . . . . Mulefat Caesalpinia species . . . . . Bird of Paradise Bush Calliandra tweedii . . . . Trinidad Flame Bush Callistemon citrinus . . . . . Lemon Bottlebrush Callistemon pallidus Callistemon rigidus . . . . . Stiff Bottle Brush Cassia species . . . . . Senna Ceanothus griseus horizontalis ' Santa Ana' Ceanothus ' Concha' Ceanothus ' Joyce Coulter' Ceanothus ' Julia Coulter' Ceanothus 'Mountain Haze ' Ceanothus ' Sierra Blue ' Cercocarpus ledifolius . . . . . Curl-leaf Mountain Hahogany Chamelaucium uncinatum . . . . . Geraldton Waxflower Cistus purpureus . . . . . Orchis Rockrose Cotoneaster lacteus . . . . . Red Clusterberry Cytisus species . . . . . Broom Dendromecon harfordii . . . . . Island Bush Poppy Dodonaea viscosa . . . . . Hopseed Bush Elaeagnus pungens . . . . . Silverberry Eucalyptus macrocarpa . . . . . Desert Malee Feijoa sellowiana . . . . . Pineapple Guava Garrya species . . . . . Silktassel Grevillea ' Noelii ' Grevillea rosmarinifolia . . . . . Rosemary Grevillea Grevillea thelemanniana . . . . . Hummingbird Bush Isomeris arborea . . . . . Bladderpod Jasminum humile . . . . . Italian Jasmine Juniperus species . . . . . Juniper Laurus nobilis . . . . . Sweet Bay Lupinus arboreus . . . . . Tree Lupine Mahonia amplectans Mahonia nevinii • . . Nevin Mahonia Nerium oleander . . . . . Oleander Penstemon antirrhinoides . . . . . Yellow Penstemon Photinia fraseri DROUGHT TOLERANT PLANTS FOR ATASCADERO MEDIUM SHRUBS 5-10 feet, continued Pittosporum tobira . . . . . Tobira Pyracantha species . . . . . Firethorn Rhamnus californica . . . . . California Coffeeberry Rhamnus crocea . . . . . Redberry Ribes aureum . . . . . Golden Currant Ribes sanguineum . . . . . Red Flowering Gooseberry Ribes sanuineum ' Glutinusum. . . . . . Romneya coulteri . . . . . Matilija Poppy Salvia apiana . . . . . White Sage Simmondisia chinensis . . . . . Jojoba Tecomaria capensis . . . . . Cape Honeysuckle Viguiera species . . . . . Xylosma congestum ' Compacta' . . . . . Shiny Xylosma DROUGHT TOLERANT PLANTS FOR ATASCADERO SMALL SHRUBS 3-5 feet Achillea species . . . . . Yarrow Arctostaphylos densiflora 'James West' Arctostaphylos hookeri . . . . . Monterey Manzanita Arctostaphylos ' Green Sphere ' Argemone species . . . . . Prickly Poppy Artemisia californica . . . . . California Sagebrush Calliandra californica Calliandra eriophylla . . . . . False Mesquite Cassia species . . . . . Senna Ceanothus ' Blue Cushion' - Cistus species . . . . . Rockrose Convolvulus cneorum . . . . . Bush Morning Glory Cotoneaster buxifolius . . . . . Bright Bead Cotoneaster Cotoneaster congestus Encelia farinosa . . . . . Desert Encelia Eriogonum crocatum . . . . . Saffron Buckwheat Eriogonum fasciculatum . . . . . Common Buckwheat Hypericum beanii Juniperus species . . . . . Juniper Lavandual species . . . . . Lavender Leptodactylon californicum . . . . . Prickly Phylox Leucophyllum frutescens ' Compactum' . . . . . Texas Ranger Lotus scoparius . . . . . Deerweed Lupinus arboreus . . . . . Tree Lupine Mimulus species . . . . . Monkey Flower Osteospermum species . . . . . African Daisy Pennisetum setaceum . . . . . Fountain Grass Penstemon heterophyllus . . . . . Blue Penstemon Penstemon spectabilis . . . . . Showy Penstemon Pi ' ttosporum tobira wheelers . . . . . Wheeler' s Dwarf Pyracantha species . . . . . Firethorn Rosmarinus officinalis ' Prostratus. . . . . . Prostrate Rosemary Salvia clevelandii . . . . . Cleveland Sage L DROUGHT TOLERANT PLANTS FOR ATASCADERO GROUND COVERS Acacia redolens Achillea species Yarrow .Arctostaphylos species Atriplex glauca Baccharis pilularis . . . . . Prostrate Coyote Brush Ceanothus griseus horizontalis . . . . . Carmel Creeper Centaurea cineraria Dusty Miller Cistus salviifolius . . . . . Sageleaf Rockrose Coprosma kirkii . . . . . Creeping Coprosma Cotoneaster buxifolius . . . . . Bright Bead Cotoneaster Cotoneaster congestus Eriogonum crocatum . . . . . Saffron Buckwheat Eriogonum fasciculatum . . . . . Common Buckwheat Gazania species . . . . . Gazania Grevillea 'Noellii' Grevillea rosmarinifolia . . . . . Rosemary Grevillea Helianthemum species • . Sunrose Hypericum calycinum . . . . . Aaron' s Beard Juniperus species . . . . . Juniper Lobularia maritima . . . . . Sweet Alyssum Lupinus nanus . . . . . Annual Lupine Mahonia repens . . . . . Creeping Mahonia Pyracantha species . . . . . Firthorn Rosma'inusofficinalis ' Prostratus' Prostrate Rosemary Salvia sonomensis . . . Creeping Sage Santolina chamaecyparissus . . . . . Lavender Cotton Santolina virens Trifolium frageriferum O' Connor' s . . . . . O' Connor' sLegume Zauschneria californica . . . . California Fuchsia MG AGENDA DATE lO/13/86 ITEM $ 2 M E M O R A N D U M TO: City Council October 13 , 1986 VIA: Michael Shelton, City Manager FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director A,-- SUBJECT: Proposed Ordinance to enable private sewage disposal systems on slopes over 30%. BACKGROUND: We have had to reject a building permit application owing to their having a private sewage disposal system proposed on slopes of 30% or more which is prohibited by the City' s Title 8, Building Regulations, Chapter 4 , Plumbing Code. The City is required to implement the California Regional Water Qual- ity Control Board' s "Basin Plan" . However , they have advised that engineered systems may be acceptable on 30% or more slopes subject, to their approval. ANALYSIS: Much of the City' s more difficult terrain is now being proposed for single family residential construction. The City' s west side (see attached graphic) has considerable land areas that are over 30% in slope. Title 8, Chapter 4 Building Regulations, contains the follow- ing language: Title 8 , Chapter 4 , Section 8-4. 105 (b) (3) (ii) "Private sewage disposal systems proposed to be installed on slopes of 20% or more shall be designed by and have their installation inspected and certified by a registered civil engineer . The design shall minimize grading disruption associated with access for installa- tion and maintenance. Such systems shall be prohibited on slopes of 30% or more. " Staff of the Water Quality Control Board have advised that it is pos- sible to have engineered systems that may be acceptable to them on slopes of 30% or more subject to their review and approval. Clearly, the City, on its part, should not be encouraging creation 'of new lots on excessively steep terrain, but enabling approval of safe alternate • systems on existing lots of record should be permitted. The City Attorney has confirmed that the City may amend the Plumbing Code pro- vided appropriate procedures are included to comply with the State ' s Water Code. f 0 9 Re: Private Sewage Disposal Systems on Slopes over 30% RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the attached draft ordinance to amend Title 8, Chapter 4 to enable consideration of engineered systems on slopes of 30% or more. HE:ps Enclosures: Atascadero Generalized Slopes Map Draft Ordinance No. 139 file: title8 • 2 ORDINANCE NO. 139 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO AMENDING TITLE 8 BUILDING REGULATIONS, CHAPTER 4, PLUMBING CODE, TO ENABLE APPROVAL OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS ON SLOPES OF 30% OR MORE WHEREAS, the City of Atascadero' s plumbing regulations currently prohibit construction of private sewage disposal systems on slopes of 30% or more; WHEREAS, there are numerous parcels in the City of Atascadero having slopes of 30% or more; and WHEREAS, the City is required to comply with the Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin (Basin Plan) , adopted by the Calif- ornia Regional Water Quality Control Board - Central Coast Region; and WHEREAS, said plan enables approval of private sewage disposal systems on slopes of more than 30% provided that an engineered system acceptable to both the City and the Water Quality Control Board are approved. NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Atascadero does ordain as follows: 1. Title 8, Chapter 4 , Section 8-4.105 , Private Sewage Disposal Systems (b) General Design Standards, (3) , Additional Stand- ards (ii) is hereby amended to read as follows: Private sewage disposal systems proposed to be installed on slopes of 20% or more shall be designed by and have its in- stallation inspected and certified by a registered civil en- gineer . The design shall minimize grading disruption associ- ated with access for installation and maintenance. Disposal systems proposed to be installed on slopes of 30% or more are subject to the review and approval of the Regional Water Quality Control Board prior to the issuance of a permit. Section 1. Publication. The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published once within fifteen (15) days after its passage in the Atascadero News, a newspaper of general circulation, printed, published, and circulated in the City in accordance with Section 36933 of the Government Code; shall certify the adopting and posting of this ordinance and shall cause this ordinance and this certification together with proof of posting to be entered into the Book of Ordinances of this City. Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall go into effect and be in full force and ef- fect at 12:01 a.m. on the 31st day after its passage. The foregoing ordinance was introduced on and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council a on AYES: NOES: ABSENT: By: MARJORIE MACKEY, Mayor City of Atascadero, California ATTEST: BOYD C. SHARITZ, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: I k4'IL h:'�x MICH L SHELTON, City Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: ROBERT M. JONES, City Attorney PREPARED BY: HENRY ENGEN, Community Development Director 2 ��I►. O �'c o0 C=y Q � U A a Lw ® FF Er .2 W G ` O qQa �•r LUW k` Y LO AS' a , !W a N � W a L9 I q N N W GWW1, EL J tti /' 1 ci J ri f �A� tv �. { vN '�` L: �� t, yo- �i � � t '1\/ L.� �` .} N�{•u''ilY^ sZr em'' si' - •k \ i.,,• :I' \...5�'�v0is•., - ���¢ c;i! C:'r-#e.Y1 /. \,y.`:t I 1. J:�•-� N G' -�14f ai.tf(,• fir�.t".:Sa \r, �w I �r_ /_ s Y .(X"�- } \ �� � r ji- t /A5S s M v t \\�,-I�(til'.. - ?9.err YFlrs•>r�*7 I.1 4 �v.��\; �/ r �/ ^ r -�� � �, 111 s x0 — r � •. ` i ire 'if �vh� x�O€ �- I a ` r r .3 3 Y ¢..... f. a �O '�� s� r / �/ `3.��/!�� �� 1 -F'�\. \/ ,✓ 1 ���.la'^ '�:t � F t �l'-,.- 31 -''..>�i,\ - Ifi-• <, .i�: (< I�• .� '".'-� ;,� ; �i ' � -� r r .i c ..''"`� j �j s � � - i�\ �;�.- � �"T1 {(t'� tf t \. '�• �tS -�' I/ ip�` :#. � may. K x ," ,s'w� \' 1� I "f t` : t'>_ . Cr �'• rYn :;\ / ! < 7� .\ ' pi AW 1 .. : : . •� '� l 11 }.;� f F -' �� (J/�-• t f ':Sc tik ti it Q a � MEET;N3 AGz-NDA 10/13/86 ITEM 0-- RESOLUTION 115-86 • RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO OPPOSITION TO MEASURE "A" WHEREAS, if passed, Measure A on the November 4, 1986 County of San Luis Obispo ballot, would make significant changes in the established process used to „grant permits for the construction or modification of onshore oil processing facilities. WHEREAS, oil production in Federal waters off the county coast is expected in upcoming years. To support this production, facilities to separate water from oil are also needed; and WHEREAS, Measure A defines onshore support facilities as "any” land use, installation, or activity required to support the exploration, development, production, storage, processing, transportation, or related activities of offshore energy resources; and WHEREAS, the City of Atascadero is very concerned that such businesses could be owned by or employ residents of Atascadero; • and WHEREAS, if Measure A passes, it would lead the oil industry to build processing facilities offshore in Federal waters. These facilities would then be outside county environmental control and within the jurisdiction of the Federal Government. Furthermore, the county would not gain any revenue from such facilities if they were located at sea; and WHEREAS, our county government has a proven system in place to make sound permitting decisions about onshore oil support facilities. It is thorough and requires more than two years of public hearings; and WHEREAS, county-wide elections are quite expensive. One special election could cost taxpayers $200 , 000; and WHEREAS, Measure A is opposed by county Supervisors Jerry Diefenderfer , Carl Hysen, Bill Coy, and Ruth Brackett, and WHERE.'., on this date, over 2,000 county residents ahve adopted positions against Measure A. Many of these Measure A opponents live in Atascadero. THEREFORE, be it resolved that to protect our effective system of representative government, to strengthen environmental . controls, and increase county tax revenue, the City of Atascadero hereby resolves to oppose Measure A. 9 0 On motion by Councilperson and seconded • by Councilperson , the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ADOPTED: ATTEST: CITY OF ATASCADERO BOYD C. SHARITZ MARJORIE R. MACKEY City Clerk Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: ROBERT M. JONES Interim City Attorney • &ING WGMmA DATA 10/13/86 rEm # D - 1 MEMORANDUM TO: City Council THROUGH: Mike Shelton, City Manager FROM: Paul Sensibaugh, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Bethel-Messer/Nelson Request for Relief from Sewer Fees DATE: October 8, 1986 Recommendation: Staff recommnds Council not give relief to the two projects and that sewer permits be issued only upon payment of the Sewer Fees and Charges in effect at the time of issuance. Background: At the September 8th regular meeting Council directed staff to negotiate with the developers to see if there was a happy • medium between the new fees and the old fees. Additionally, it was understood that staff was to research the impact that such negotiations would or could have on sewer revenues. The attached research report from Valerie Humphrey, Clerical Technician shows that the total loss in revenues is expected to be $68,494 involving 110 units in four use categories. This im- pact is much greater than was originally anticipated. The pre- sent fees were based on potential connections to the system to complete buildout and included any units not having permits at that time. Therefore, even though no calculation is expected to be exact when it is based on building speculation, there is a greater chance that the sinking fund won' t be sufficient at pre- sent unit fees if reductions allowed. Discussion: The sewer fees are unrelated to development fees in their theory and method of collection. A permit has always been re- quired and a fee, however small, has always been collected upon the issuance of the sewer permit. The ordinance was ammended to reflect several changes suggested in the recent Sewer Study. Hearings and Public meetings, as well as newspaper articles, gave adequate warnings that on July 1 the sewer fees would be re- established at an increased amount. Many scenarios were con- • sidered as an urgency measure and, thus effective 30 days after passage. Fiscal Impact: The anticipated potential loss of revenue due to the domino effect of allowing relief coiuld exceed $68,000. Attachments: Valerie' s Report Previous Agneda Report • MEMORANDUM TO: Paul Sensibaugh, Director of Public Works FROM: Valerie Humphrey, Clerical Technician SUBJECT: Messer/Nelson - Sewer Fee Appeal DATE: October 6, 1986 Background At the City Council meeting of September 8, 1986 a report was given pertaining to two separate developments. These dev- elopements were; 16 Unit Condominium - Bethel/Frank/Messer : 18 Unit Condominium - Nelson. In both cases the developers are re- questing that they not be required to pay the sewer fees now in effect. At that time the issue was referred back to staff. Discussion In my research I examined 3 different scenarios to determine the loss of revenues if the requests from the two developers were granted. This is assuming that what is determined to be correct for one is correct for all. I have listed the results by type of permit issued and revenue that will be forfeited if the requests by the developers are approved. Scenario #1 - Building Permit in Process - able to obtain Sewer Connection Fee prior to New Fees but did not. Apartments - 19 Units $23 ,025 Condominiums - 34 Units 19, 482 Commercial - 30 Units 3,690 Single Family - 3 1,719 10 $47,916 9 '. • • Scenario #2 - Sewer Connection Permit Issued at New Fees Although Building Permit Obtained Prior to New Fees - Refund would be appropriate if other are not required to pay fees. Commercial - 7 Units 3, 058. 20 Single Family - 3 2, 079.00 5,137.20 Scenario #3 - Building Permits Finaled - No Sewer Connection Permit Applied for or Issued (This was an unexpected situation and probably would not have been detected if this study was not done) Apartments - 8 Units 13,248.00 Commercial - 4 Units 497.00 Single Family - 2 1,696.00 15, 441.00 Recommendation . Sewer Connection Fees charged have always been the fees in effect at the time the SEWER PERMIT is issued. Therefore, scenarios #1 and #3 should be required to pay the current fees when their permits are issued. . MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Directors, Atascadero County Sanitation District THROUGH: Mike Shelton, City Manager FROM: Paul Sensibaugh, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Developer ' s Request for Special Consideration on Sewer Fees DATE: September 3, 1986 Recommendation Staff recommends that the two developments requests to not pay the sewer fees now in effect be denied. Background Two written requests have been received to not pay the current sewer fees, but to pay the fees in effect prior to July 1, 1986 . Section 12.3 of the Sewer Ordinance states: "Relief: Any person, who by reason of special circumstances believes that the application of any of the provisions of this Ordinance Code to him is unjust or inequitable, may make written application to the Board of Directors for relief therefrom. Said application shall set forth all of the special facts and cir- cumstances and shall request the specific relief or modification desired. The Board of Directors upon receipt of such application and after such investigation as deemed necessary may take action to grant such relief or modificatin as it finds necessary. " Discussion Case 1 - Bethel/Frank/Messer (Precise Plan 55-84) 16 Units. The developer had a precise plan and grading plan in process prior to the effective date of the new sewer fees, and believes that that fact should allow payment of the old sewer fees. The precise plan conditions for this condominum project states that "Sewer connection fees are due at the time of hook-up to the system or before recordation of the final map. " There is no language discussing the amount of the fee. No sewer permit was applied for until the last week of August. Staff set the charge based on the present fees, since no previous dis- cussion with the deeloper had transpired relative to said fees and since the application was not filed prior to July 1. Although a developer may apply for sewer connection if* legitimate precise plan or building permit is in process, there nothing in the new fee ordinance that exempted those already in the pipeline. It was indicated at the public hearing that if application was made before the new fees went into effect that the old fees would apply. This matter was the subject of a special news article after passage. Case 2 - Nelson (Precise Plan 19-86) (Building Permits 2569 & 2570) - 18 Units The developer had a building permit issued prior to the July 1 deadline, but did not apply for a sewer permit until the last week of August. The precise plan conditions did not address sewer , otherwise the issues on both sides are similar to case 1 above. Discussion Neither developer applied for a permit in a timely manner , discussed the fees with staff or had any agreements with staff re- garding the amount of the respective sewer fees. The rapid development of apartments and condominiums played a large role in the realization that the sewer fees were not adequa to mitigate the necessary improvements to the infrastructure requi by such development. Staff feels that there was adequate time giv by Council to apply for a permit prior to the enactment of the new fees. Fiscal Impact The ACSD would not collect about $19,500 if relief is given to the two developments. Attachments Planning Background Information File:Appeal 2 DENNIS B ETHEL & ASSOCIATES, INC. CIVIL ENGINEERS 313 B East Plaza Drive,Suite 9 • Santa Maria,California 93454 • (805) 928-7666 August 27, 1986 DB 6267 City of Atascadero Administration Bldg. P.O. Box 747 Atascadero, CA 93423 Attn: Paul Sensibaugh Subject: Creekside Dear Mr. Sensibaugh: In reference to our telephone conversation of August 22, we understand that your office cannot issue a sewer connection permit for the Creekside project without collecting a sewer fee of approximately $9, 000 even though the project was approved prior to the enactment of the fee. We also understand that the only way we can avoid payment of this fee is by an appeal to the City Council. We therefore request that you consider this a formal request for such a hearing. There are several reasons why we do not believe it is fair or just to change this fee to the Creekside project. 1. This project had been approved prior to enactment of the fee, it was in the plan check process, and it was almost ready for issuance of final permits prior to adoption of the fees. 2 . Other fees that have been adopted applied only to projects submitted after adoption. There was no public notice that this fee would be differenIC. .-Re believe t le City should have notified applicants in the permit process so that they could make their application for permit prior to the fee. The Creekside project -ould certainly have done this if they had been aware of --a option. 3 . when a project is ready for issuance of permits and has made all of the financial arrangments it is not fair to impose substantial increased costs. A project of this magnitude places burdens on anybody's financial position and these are fees that the owner doesn't have. • jDenBethe ny furthe action we must take to expedite this ase let us now. Thank you for your assistance. , DB:jb s _ EXHIBIT C. - t Conditions of. Approval Precise Plan 55-84 5600 West Mall _ � � (Bethel/Frank) 'construction shall be in conformance -W' ith Exhibit - .(site plan landscaping) , Exhibit B (site plan)' and Exhibit Cs; (conditi6ns of approval) along with all applicable codes and ordinances of the City of Atascader ,. c 2. Provisions shall be made -for a handicapped parking,°stall and trash x enclosure. Locations of these will be reviewed and approved by the Planni.ng `Department. _ < , 3. Completion of -the -circulation loop shall be ;required during ;tzPhase I. A temporary hard surface loop_ is agv cceptable. s ;` .-..;- "'' -.; <r. ;* :`., - - •r- r r d .-Y^�"f 4Ki'-4�set 'x".� 't �'-*`""''� '4. Landscape and irrigation plans shall be reviewed and rapprovedby� z : thePlanning Department prior to the issuance of =a bdii'd ng"per r mit, to 'include provisions for maintaining the undeveloped area of a r' Phase II ` in a clean and sightly manner C.. :':' •:.: .- - `.. :,:. -:' :,: n ��� .rte„''_.�'<�r'.tyS-"!'''a �,.,, r 5. Drainage and erosion control plans shall be reviewed. and _approved by the .Public- Works Departments prior. to the issuance of a build ing permit. 6. All easement locations shall be verified - prior to issuance `; of building its. _ ' 7. Two- fire hydrants shall be required - `one at the driveway entrance and the other at the *`landscaped area at the center:°�of _the project. Exact ;location and design shall be determined by; the Fire ;Department. w a 8. :Sewer connection fees: are due at the time of hook-up to_ the sys temor- before recordation of the final map. f � 9. Public improvement plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Public Works Department. _ ; a. Sear improvement plans, including details of, manhole on st on.:ction, shall be submitted to and approved by: the Public k -Wo ;s Department. b. Storm drainage and system improvement plans ; shall rbe re viewed and approved by the Public Works Department:` � f, . ..''Y tr c. A five .foot wide sidewalk shall be constructed along the full r x 4 >, ..:.frontage. i 1. . � I . � . . . .. I - . . . . I I � � - - _. , - I I I. , 11.1-- - . __. __ ._:_..__ � . I .., . . . .. I I . : - . I.q, , I � I- .. � — , .� _.:, . . - . I .. �. I I��._.". . I - I. . � .-. .. � :�� .. I I "'1'.'I...d....._.��.,., ': ?.'�,-. � _--,�..� *I I , ... ; . F - - .: I. .. . . - '1� � ; d. The 12 inch abandoned sewer main crossing the site is � to be removed or crush1.ed1 . . �} L , �� of _ t .� = ,K .'e. .A permit shall be, secured from Caltrans ' to work in their right-of way for sidewalk and sewer _ ine 'construction.` s W"�},k _ _ ..:i�.l`� �.j -AS`'tea' F N� 10. 'Development shall be subject to anyL City wide development fee ,V, schedule .,:which may be adopted by the":City Council' to mitigate `im ~ - acts `on -schools and other }� ` �'�""�' p public facilities. � S - i 11.` All conditions of approval of Tentative Tract Map '20 84 shall be a - complied with. 3 . — a 4. ;: ._ . ., 12. This recise lana L + p p approval is approved for. one: year from the date "�� of , final ;approval (January ,7, 1985) , unless an appeal is filed.-- tip`'. 2♦-( -v a^ti 5 r', - - is j,.--4i7 :JAN .,.v � �- Yr}., 2tesNi 1. lJ' �F tt�f Y ' ' 7 Aax + a 3 z sx= „ 5. kr . ^ ? Ta� i-, y E� hs s -, " S �. !, 4£ Y. S =All�t i` K, l'� 2 4 e�`,._}J ;� _ - „ �::-�� �Er y�.ts}cr.1.C'lJ yy}'Fp --o,,- fir "`a', $ . 1 } } _t- �� $ 1 Y t_ __ J f {_ L. - . v - s '` {a_5 .: .. : -. _ r, . L. - '. :: dr_ - - - 4 .�` ...:..-" .. - - , `• - - - k •Y .. _ : _. - ? sn1 - , ,.-_k r ? 3' } t .N,4 .3+w ^t t - 2 :. - -- _ F "t _ - ! - - - N:.Y Y .:E. 1. l 1 lF ,r c y,.'�`` y .,x ,p r f. `." r _ri 'LL's,'Y �,r' (- L 1 .y t �t ` : - _:r-cJ` 4 Y'1*G a'.�t,, 2 yc•'� J-t_-y� "'s jt , n{ i r ! S �' ` a'fi' re 4. Y- �5. }1,�1 i SL�` Y' C�,P r ; wcy s€ ` }'£ry��r : -1ti..-.x^,�� �ffi ?.� „a i r'trr "".,, y..,'R n c r_:5, ,.,i- -2'S:+ ' a� r.'C �',n .- ., !'. -r .,>.:.- r h s)Xr..s.,: �; Y -:V xw.ss r :}r 2'+rl*S '�?< 1^ .£ _e 1Z. n <f t; �. ti 4 ADMINISTRATION BUILDING t CITY ATTORNEY POST OFFICE BOX 747 POST OFFICE BOX 606 ATASCAOERO. CALIFORNIA 93423 ATASCADERO•CALIFORNIA 93423 PHONE: (805) 466.8000 PHONE: (805)466-4422 CITY COUNCIL CITY CLERKaseadeiCe POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY TREASURER FICE BOX 747 INCORPORATED JULY 2. 1979 ATASCADEROST F CALIFORNIA 93423 CITY MANAGER ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT PHONE: (605) 466.8600 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT "�'• PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT E DEPARTMENT PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT FIRE LEWIS AVENUE ATASCADERO.CALIFORNIA 93422 "+ PHONE: (805) 466-2141 March 20, 1986 Mr. Daryl Nelson P. 0. Box 95 Santa Margarita, CA 93453 RE: Grading Permit No. 2351 Building Permit Nos. 2569 and 2570 Precise Plan 31-84 (9805 E1 Camino Real) Dear Mr. Nelson: I am in receipt of your letter requesting reinstatement of the above- referenced grading and building permits and precise plan approval. I must again advise you that we will be unable to reinstate these ap- provals due to the expiration of the mandated time limits. As you have previously discussed with Bob Fielding, Chief Building Inspector,- your grading permit expired in August of 1985, six months after the last inspection on February 22, 1985. Section 303 (d) of the Uniform Administrative Code specifies that building (grading) permits shall expire if work on the permitted project is suspended or aban- doned for a period 'of 180 days. Failure to call for a final inspec- tion of your grading within the 180 day time limit is considered aban- donment of your project. Our records indicate that building permits #2569 and #2570 for two (2) nine unit apartment complexes were issued on April. 25, 1985. There has not been a request for inspection of any work accomplished pursu- ant to these. permits as of this date. The provisions of UAC Section 303 (d) again apply to these permits. Further , the expiration of your grading permit prohibits reinstatement of these building permits. Finally, as- you have previously discussed with Henry Engen and myself, approval of Precise Plan 31-84 expired on August 6 , 1985 , one (1) year after its issuance. . The City' s zoning ordinance does provide for the granting of extensions (Section 9-2. 118) ; however , requests for exten- sions must be submitted and approved prior to the date of expiration of the entitlement. Further , Section 9-2. 119 provides that "No use of land or structure, the entitlement for which has lapsed pursuant to this Section, shall be reactivated , re-established, or used unless a new entitlement is first obtained. " Pie r�� �, ,�- /-1+, /�•,�Mnr �onn,•,,r 414•� /Q 5' -- ��!,�!�%�- � "v �" r � • • RE: 9805 & 9825 El Camino Real Permits #2351, 2569 , 2570 DARYL NELSON 1. Grading Permit #2351 A Grading Permit was issued on October 11, 1984 . The last inspection made re grading was February 22 , 1985 according to our records. In this case it has been well over a years ' time & per the U.B.C. no longer valid. This was relayed to Mr. Nelson. 2. ( 2 ) Nine Unit Apartment Complexes , Permits #2569 & 2570 The structure permits were issued on April 25 , 1985. As of this date, the job has not commenced. JN70TE: s oke with Dar 1 ertainin to these matters & inf rP y p g o med im that the permits would have to be reactivatedwhich is 00 of what was originally paid & that additional fees ould not have to be paid (re: School Fees & Development Fee) Bob Fielding. After I informed Daryl of this particular matter he called back a few hours later to schedule for a grading inspec- tion. I informed him I couldn 't place him down on the list since our records showed that it had been over 6 months since his last inspection. Also after I went thru the Building Permits , I then let Planning know the situation & at that time they also checked files and saw that the Precise Plan had expired on August 6 , 1985 pertaining to this project. I EXHIBIT C Conditions of Approval - Precise Plan 19-86 9805 El Camino_ Real (Nelson) 1. All construction shall be in conformance with Exhibit A (site- : plan) , Exhibit B (elevations) Exhibit C (conditions of approval) , and all other applicable codes and ordinances of . the City . of Atascadero. 2. Submit a drainage plan, prepared by a registered civil' engineer, providing for mitigating measures relieving any downstream .drain age problems or alternatively a stormwater detention -basin. -If a detention basin is selected, then the design shall be based upon a 100 year design storm, site developed, with .outflow limited to - 10 year design storm, undeveloped site, and as required by the Deten tion Basin Policy adopted August 12, 1985. .The alternate selected must be acceptable to the Director of Public Works. 3. Public improvement plans, prepared by a registered civil engineer, shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department prior to the issuance of a structural building_ permit for the site. The plans shall include, but not be limited to, curb, gut- ter, sidewalk and . paveout along El Camino Real. 4. A new fire hydrant shall be provided near the entrance drive . of the project. Exact location and design shall be reviewed and- ap- proved- by the Fire Department prior to the issuance of a -structur- al building permit. 5. A' trash enclosure shall be provided in conformance with :Section 9-4.129 of the zoning ordinance. 6. Parking area construction shall be in conformance , with Section 9-4.114 and one handicapped parking stall shall be provided. 7. A landscape plan shall be submitted by the applidant and approved by the Community Development Department prior to issuance; of . . . building .permits. 8. The handicapped parking stall shall be relocated to the area -.adja- cent to "Unit #18." A twenty (20) foot wide _portion'of the 'paved area- adjacent to the fence at the eastern property boundary -shall be striped and signed for "no parking" to provide adequate`--'room for Fire Department turnaround. 9. It shall be the applicant' s responsibility to resolve `.conflicts with public utilities and to relocate poles at his expense. 10. This precise plan is P p approved for a period of one year from the date of final approval (April 22, 1986) .