HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 072396 Approved as Submitted
Meeting Date: 8/27/96
ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL
JULY 23, 1996
MINUTES
CLOSED SESSION:
The City met in Closed Session at 5:30 p.m. for purposes of discussions pertaining to:
1) CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNCIL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
A) Significant exposure to litigation: One (1) case
B) Initiation of litigation: One (1) case
2) CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNCIL- EXISTING LITIGATION
Name of case: Spansail v. City of Atascadero
3) CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATIOR:
Agency negotiator: City Manager
Employee organizations: Management; Mid-Management/Professional; Fire
Captains; Firefighters; Atascadero Sergeants Service Orgn.; Atascadero
Police Officers Assoc.; Atascadero Public Safety Technicians Orgn.; Service
Employees Intl. Union; Confidential Employees
4) PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Title: City Manager
At 7.00 p.m., the City Council adjourned Closed Session. It was noted that Item #1
was discussed; no action taken. Items #2, 3, 4 were continued until after the end of
the regular session.
REGULAR SESSION:
The Mayor called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. Councilperson Carden led the
Pledge of Allegiance.
CC 7/23/96
Page 1
ROLL CALL:
Present: Councilmembers Bewley, Carden, Johnson, Luna and
Mayor Highland
Absent: None
Also Present: Rudy Hernandez, City Treasurer and Lee Price, City Clerk
Staff Present: Andy Takata, City Manager;; Art Montandon, City
Attorney; Roy Hanley, Deputy City Attorney; Steve
DeCamp, City Planner; Mike McCain, Fire Chief; Fred
Motlo, Fire Captain and Bill Watton, Acting Police Chief
COUNCIL COMMENTS:
Mayor Highland congratulated Councilmember Carden for being elected as
Chairman of the San Luis Obispo Council of Governments/Regional Transportation
Authority.
COMMUNITY FORUM:
Wendy Muller, resident of Atascadero, read a prepared statement criticizing the
City Council, City Manager and City Attorney for recent events involving the
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) for the Carlton Hotel and for
suspension of the Police Chief (see Exhibit A).
Leo Korba, 10905 Santa Ana Road, declared that the Police Chief is not above the
law and if it is proved that he has violated the law, he should pay the penalty. Mr.
Korba also expressed concerns about the appropriateness of recent statements
made by the Mayor, who spoke on behalf of the City Council.
Terril Graham, 6205 Conejo Road, commented that development has not been
assessed sufficiently and asked why councils have been reluctant to make
developers pay their fair share. In addition, he called for a change in the way the
City evaluates staff and in the way the public evaluates its City officials.
Ed Cabrera, 9050 Junipero, expressed concern regarding Council action placing
the Police Chief on administrative leave. He asserted that the public's trust is at-
issue and emphasized that the community deserves to feel secure when it comes
to police services. He explained that petitions requesting action by the Council are
being circulated and signed by citizens who trust that the Council will take note of
and react to their concerns.
CC 7/23/96
Page 2
Pamela Barrett, 10178 Catalpa, urged the City Council to not cut police and fire
services.
Jerry Lombard, 13945 San Antonio Road, requested that the Council re-consider
their action to suspend the Police Chief and urged his reinstatement.
Terry Graham, speaking once more, said that he personally experienced torment
from the Police Chief during the 1980's when he initiated a City Council recall
effort. He said that in his opinion the Police Chief has misused his position.
---end of public testimony---
A. CONSENT CALENDAR:
1 AUDITED BILLS AND PAYROLL - June, 1996
Staff recommendation: Approve)
2. RESOLUTION NO. 63-96 - Making findings and upholding the appeal of
Business License application (American Classics) (continued from 7/9/96)
Staff recommendation: Adopt
3. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 96003 - Consideration of application filed by Kelly
Gearhart for the subdivision of one (1) lot containing 0.7 acres into (5)
parcels ranging in size from 4,458 square feet to 8,500 square feet.
Subject site is located at 7350 Morro Road and extends through to Navajoa
Avenue.
(Planning Commission recommendation: Approve)
4. RESOLUTION NO. 71-96 - Authorizing the execution of an agreement with
the County of San Luis Obispo for the acceptance of $1 ,000 in grant funds
for Stadium park
(Staff recommendation: Adopt)
The Mayor noted that Item #2 was not yet available and that staff requests a
continuance. By mutual consent, the matter was put over until the next meeting.
MOTION: By Councilmember Johnson, seconded by Councilmember
Bewley to approve Items #1,3 and 4; motion carried 5:0 by roll call vote.
B. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. RESOLUTION NO. 67-96 - Placing delinquent solid waste charges on the
1996-97 property tax roll (continued from 7/9/96)
(Staff recommendation: Adopt)
CC 7/23/96
Page 3
Andy Takata provided the brief staff report. Michelle Velasco, representing
Atascadero Waste Alternatives, was present to respond to questions. There were
no comments from the Council or members of the public.
MOTION: By Councilmember Luna, seconded by Councilmember Johnson
to adopt Resolution No. 67-96; motion carried unanimously by roll call vote.
2. RESOLUTION 66-96 - Confirming the cost of weed abatement
(Staff recommendation: (1) Hear protests (2) Adopt resolution (3) Approve
administrative fee)
Fred Motlo provided the staff report and responded to brief questions from the
Council. Councilmember Bewley asked staff to contact the County regarding
brush around Heilman Parka Mike McCain indicated that over the years, the
department has attempted to gain compliance from other jurisdictions. He noted
that they have had experienced cooperation with the State, but are still attempting
to get the same from the County.
MOTION: By Councilmember Luna, seconded by Councilmember Johnson
to adopt Resolution No. 66-96; motion passed 5:0 by roll call vote.
3. ORDINANCE NO. 307 - Amending Section 4-2.1008 and adding Sections 4-
2.1009 and 4-2.1010 to the Atascadero Municipal Code, prohibiting
skateboarding and roller skating on public property
(Staff recommendation: Waive reading in full and introduce on first reading
by title only)
Art Montandon provided the staff report and responded to brief questions from the
City Council
Public Comments:
Rush Kolemaine, 4580 Potrero Road, requested clarification about whether a
violation of the ordinance is considered an infraction or misdemeanor. He also
asked how a violation is prosecuted and what fines are imposed. Art Montandon
explained that provisions, set forth in another part of the municipal code, specify
that the fine assessed for an infraction, upon first violation, is 50$; the second
offense is $100 but may go up to $250. A misdemeanor offense can be fined
$1,000 and given 6 months in jail, he added. The City Attorney noted that
juveniles are handled differently and pointed out that discretion is allowed for on
the part of the citing officer or the prosecuting attorney, depending upon the
circumstances. Mr. Kolemaine remarked that the ordinance should reference the
code section that sets forth the penalty and encouraged the Council to add it. He
also indicated that he hopes that there will be a system of tracking implemented to
CC 7/23/96
Page 4
maintain a record of repeat offenders. Roy Hanley reported that he, the Police
Department and the Court already have methods in place for this type of tracking.
Susan Warren, 3556 EI Camino Real, noted that Atascadero already has an active
Peer Court system and suggested that the City consider taking advantage of the
opportunity by referring some violators of the skateboard ordinance to Peer Court.
In addition, she reported the Skate Park Committee has three events planned for
the ensuing coming months and hopes to offer more in the future. offered there.
Eric Greening, 7365 Valle, expressed appreciation to the Council for being
responsive to public comment and for its willingness to allow skaters to be a part
of the process. He commented that the present draft is better than what was
previously brought to Council. Mr. Greening commented that he thinks the
reference to "misdemeanor" should be removed because it may represent selective
enforcement.
Rick Mathews, 6955 Navarette, said that the ordinance was a common sense
approach to the problem and reported that the Skate Park Committee will
encourage skaters to develop a set of etiquette and rules.
---end of public testimony---
MOTION: By Councilmember Johnson, seconded by Councilmember Luna
to waive reading in full and introduce Ordinance No. 307 by title only;
motion carried 5:0 by roll call vote.
By unanimous agreement, the matter of posting public areas in the downtown was
referred to the Traffic Committee. Councilmember Luna invited the public to
attend and provide input when the matter is heard by the committee. Art
Montandon suggested that a representative from the Chamber of Commerce
and/or business community also attend the meeting. The City Clerk announced
that a recruitment is on-going for the purpose of soliciting interested members of
the public to serve as members-at-large on the Traffic Committee. That
recruitment will close on August 23, 1996, she added.
C. REGULAR BUSINESS:
1. ORDINANCE NO. 306 - Amending Map 6 of the Official Zoning Maps by
rezoning certain real property at 4700 Traffic Way from RMF/10 to
RMF/10(PD7) (ZC96002: Gearhart)
(Staff recommendation: Adopt on second reading)
Steve DeCamp provided the staff report and recommendation to adopt on second
reading. He noted that there was some confusion about Council intention at the
meeting of July 9" regarding Condition #41 (building footprint) and suggested
CC 7/23/96
Page 5
that, if it was the majority of the Council's intent that 35% shall be an average,
staff can draft a condition to be included with the map to clarify the issue.
Councilmember Luna asked the City Attorney if the City was liable if the
contractor does not pay prevailing wages. Art Montandon explained that he has a
responsibility to protect the City against this type of liability and because the City
would be in a partnership with the developer, he would advise that prevailing
wages be paid. Steve DeCamp pointed out that the engineering estimate was not
based upon paying prevailing wages. Councilmember Luna voiced concern that
the City is being boxed in and may be on the hook for a larger price-tag. Art
Montandon noted that the agreement with the developer will come back to Council
for final approval. In response to Councilmember Luna's inquiry, the City Attorney
noted that if the agreement is not approved, the map cannot be finalized. Council-
member Luna remarked that he would prefer to see the agreement before taking
any further action and asked if there were legal implications if the second reading
of the ordinance were to be postponed. Steve DeCamp replied that the tentative
map has already been approved, but is moot without the ordinance. The
subdivision cannot proceed without the zoning change, he clarified. Council-
member Bewley pointed out that the agreement is a condition of approval and
reiterated a desire to study the cost to complete the entire drainage solution as
part of the budget review for the 1996-97 fiscal year.
Public Comments:
Donald Jones, 4585 Viscano, contended that the conditions of approval keep
changing and urged the City Council to postpone a decision.
Eric Greening spoke in favor of delaying adoption of the ordinance until the Council
has seen and approved the agreement.
---end of public testimony---
MOTION: By Councilmember Carden, seconded by Councilmember
Bewley to adopt Ordinance No. 306 on second reading with the condition
that the contract comes back for Council approval.
Discussion and amendment to motion: Councilmember Johnson asked that
the language of Condition #41 be clarified to include that the 35% building
footprint is an average throughout the project. Motion was amended to
include this direction to staff.
Vote on the motion: Motion to adopt Ordinance No. 306 on second reading
and to amend Condition #41 of the Conditions of Approval passed 4:1
(Councilmember Luna opposed).
CC 7/23/96
Page 6
D. COMMITTEE REPORTS (The following represent standing committees.
Informative status reports were given, as follows.):
1. S.L.O. Council of Govern ments/S.L.0. Regional Transit Authority -
Councilmember Carden reported that there will be no meetings in July and
explained that, as Chairman of COG, he will attend the Western States
Council of Governments conference later this week.
2. Air Pollution Control District Mayor Highland reported that the APCD will
meet on July 241H
3. North County Council - Mayor Highland explained that the executive
committee will meet in September.
4. Ad Hoc Regional Water Management Committee - Mayor Highland
announced that the next meeting will be in September.
E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION:
1. City Council
Councilmember Johnson requested that staff provide more timely distribution of
press releases following Closed Sessions in which there is action to report.
2. City Manager
Andy Takata mentioned that two councilmembers (Johnson and Carden) will be
absent from the meeting of August 27th and noted that it will be necessary to have
all three other members of Council present to ensure a quorum.
The City Council adjourned to Closed Session at 8:22 p.m. to resume discussions
regarding Items #2, 3 & 4. Closed Session was adjourned at approximately 11:00
p.m. Items #3 & 4 were continued to a Special Closed Session on Tuesday,
August 30, 1996 at 5:30 p.m. THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY
COUNCIL WILL BE TUESDAY, AUGUST 13, 1996 AT 7:00 P.M.
MINUTES RECORDED AND PREPARED BY:
LEE PRICE, C.M.0
CITY CLERK
Attachment: Exhibit A (Muller)
CC 7/23/96
Page 7
CC 7/23/96
EXHIBIT A
Page 1 of 2
Good evening, Mr. Mayor and the City Council,
My name is Wendy Muller. I have lived in Atascadero for over 11 years and I love this
city. I am greatly concerned about the current financial state of our town and finally felt
compelled to speak publicly to the City Council.,I am here and must express my anger and
bewilderment with the City Manager, City Attorney and City Council.
It appears that Atascadero has some very big problems:
1 Because of mismanagement of our funds,our city lost millions in an investment
debaucle in Orange County. We may or may not get any of that money back. Someone must
take responsibility for this mess.
2. Because of mismanagement and incompetence,we lost grant funds intended to
retrofit the Carlton Hotel. The funds were given improperly to the contractor, proper procedures
were not followed and the County wants the entire$100,000 back-Guess what? We don't have
it. Again, someone must take responsibility for this embarassing mess.
3. Because of political aspirations and vengeful personal vendettas,our police chief
was suspended and ordered to remain at home from 8-5 M-F. What are you thinking? Where's
the proof before punishment. These actions were taken due to the accusations of a barely
literate letter from a non-existent person who gave a non-existent address. In a court of law, such
a letter would be summarily dismissed and paid no creedence. This city needs its police chief
back at work. This sort of Krelimesque action against Chief McHale is unacceptable to me
Something is really wrong here at City Hall. I thought we lived in Amercia.
4. There are funds being mishandled and placed in departments where they do not
belong. Designated grants can be messed with in such a manner. The State and Federal
gov't. get really cranky when people don't follow their rules. Just what is going on here.?
In my mind,the buck stops squarely on Andy Takata and Art Montandon's desks. Our
city is like a large corporation. The City Manager is like a CEO. The city attorney is like the in-
house counsel and the city council is like the Board of Directors. The citizens of Atascadero are
the shareholders in the corporation. We are tired of our money being lost and mishandled by the
administration
Our Board has been given bad advice by both the CEO and legal counsel (Takata and
Montandon). The shareholders(us)have lost a lot of money because of the ineptitude and
failures of the two people who have been hired to know better. We trusted them to take care of
our money and look out for the best interest of our city. The one single department which is run
efficiently has had its dept. head suspended. Why? It looks to me like the wrong people were
removed.
CC 7/23/96
EXHIBIT A "
Page 2 of 2
We cannot have such financial chaos and expect the city to remain in business. We
cannot keep buying buildings, land and other interests just because people want to. That is
irresponsible and based in fantasy.
We have a city attorney who has accused Chief McHale of conflict of interest. I'm
personally glad that the Chief chose to buy his car locally. I don't buy mine locally, but I think
he sets a good example. I believe that Mr.Takata got his leased car from Atas. Ford,too. Did he
follow competitive bid procedures? Perhaps because he is friends with the current owner,there
is conflict of interest.
What about the memo sent by Mr. Montandon to the City Manager and to all the officers
on the police dept. to their homes threatening a civil ldwsuit if they did not handle a particular
criminal case the way he wished. This was done in the name of the city attorney. Have you seen
this memo? You should. Things are very strange here in City Hall
The City Manager and City Attorney have lost their objectivity and do not have our best
interests at heart. They violated our trust. They lost our money by actions which are
unforgiveable and just wrong. Now, Mr. Takata is proposing to raise our taxes to pay for the
incompentent actions of his office and the City Attorney's office. They better raise it a bunch
because the law suits are going to be stacking up thanks to these two.
Mr. Montandon has been in office too long and interjected himself into the politics of our
city. As our city attorney, this is not acceptable. Objectivity is necessary and vital to the
performance of his job.
t e
I propose that this city hire a new city manager, perhaps more qualified o do the job
P P tY tY g � P P 4 J
with which they are entrusted. I also propose that the City Attorney's contract not be renewed
and perhaps the contract should be rotated unless the legal counsel proves they will not get
personally involved in city politics.
Lastly, Chief Bud McHale needs to be back on the job yesterday. This city needs him,
not a Public Safety Dept. If you try to do this in this city,I will fight it. We incorporated for a
reason, and having the police department was number one. Chief McHale has led this city into
the safe zone we know and love. My kids can walk downtown safely__—They know many officers
personally and-that's a nice feeling.
Please reconsider your previous action and put the Chief back on the job now.
Thank you.