HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda 071294 AGENDA
ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
CITY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING
6500 PALMA AVENUE, 4TH FLOOR ROTUNDA ROOM
JULY 12, 1994
7:00 P.M.
This agenda is prepared and posted pursuant to the requirements of Government Code
Section 54954.2. By listing a topic on this agenda, the City Council has expressed its
intent to discuss and act on each item. In addition to any action identified in the brief
general description of each item, the action that may be taken shall include: A referral to
staff with specific requests for information; continuance; specific direction to staff
concerning the policy ormission of the item;discontinuance of consideration;authorization
to enter into negotiations and execute agreements pertaining to the item, adoption or
approval; and, disapproval.
Copies of the staff reports or other documentation relating to each item of business
referred to on the agenda are on file in the office of the City Clerk (Room 208) and in the
Information Office (Room 103), available for public inspection during City Hafl business
hours. The City Clerk will answer any questions regarding the agenda.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to
participate in a City meeting or other services offered by this City,please contact the City
Manager's Office ((805) 461-5010) or the City Clerk's Office ((805) 461-5074)• Notifica-
tion at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time when services are needed will assist the
City staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility
to the meeting or service.
RULES OF PUBLIC PARTICIPATION:
* Members of the audience may speak on any item on the agenda.
* A person may speak for five (5) minutes.
* No one may speak for a second time until everyone wishing to speak has had
an opportunity to do so.
* No one may speak more than twice on any item.
* Council Members may question any speaker; the speaker may respond but,
after the allotted time has expired, may not initiate further discussion.
* The floor will then be closed to public participation and open for Council
discussion.
CALL TO ORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS
O Confirm City Council Committee Assignments (Mayor Bewley)
PRESENTATIONS:
O Tom Walters, Wil-Mar Disposal, Inc., of California Redemption Value
Refund (from Curbside Recycling Program).
COMMUNITY FORUM:
The City Council values and encourages exchange of ideas and comments from
you, the citizen. The Community Forum period is provided to receive comments from
the public on matters other than scheduled agenda items. To increase the effective-
ness of Community Forum, the following rules will be enforced:
* A maximum of 30 minutes will be allowed for Community Forum, unless
Council authorizes an extension.
* All remarks shall be addressed to Council, as a whole, and not to any individual
member thereof.
* No person shall be permitted to make slanderous, profane or personal remarks
against any elected official, commissions and staff.
A. COMMITTEE REPORTS (The following represent ad hoc or standing commit-
tees. Informative status reports will be given, as felt necessary.):
1 . S.L.O. Council of Governments/Regional Transit Authority
2. City/School Committee
3. Traffic Committee
4. County Water Advisory Board
5. Economic Round Table
6. Colony Roads Committee
7. Liability Claims Review & Finance Committee
8. Nacimiento Water Purveyors Advisory Group
9. Highway 41 Realignment Community Advisory Committee
B. CONSENT CALENDAR:
All matters listed under Item B, Consent Calendar, are considered to be routine, and
will be enacted by one motion in the form Fisted below. There will be no separate
discussion on these items. A member of the Council or public may, by request, have
any item removed from the Consent Calendar, which shall then be reviewed and acted
upon separately after the adoption of the Consent Calendar:
2
1. RESOLUTION NO. 42-94 - Placing the Annual Payment for Assessment District
No. 8 (South San Gabriel) on the Property Taxes for the 1994-95 Fiscal Year
2. RESOLUTION NO. 67-94 - Recommending Continuation of Current Developer
Fee Schedule
3. RESOLUTION NO. 68-94 - Annual Ratification of the San Luis Obispo Council
of Governments Joint Powers Agreement for Fiscal Year 1994-95
4. FINAL APPROVAL OF THE AGREEMENT TO CONVEY REAL PROPERTY AND
THE JOINT OCCUPANCY AGREEMENT RELATING TO THE ACQUISITION OF
THE MASONIC TEMPLE
5. PAYMENT OF BILLS AND AUDITED PAYROLL FOR JUNE 1994
C. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. RESOLUTION NO. 63-94 - Authorizing Placement of Delinquent Solid Waste
Charges on Property Taxes for Fiscal Year 1994-95
2. RESOLUTION NO. 64-94 - Authorizing Placement of Annual Sewer Service
Charges on Property Taxes for Fiscal Year 1994-95
3. RESOLUTION NO. 65-94 - General Plan Amendment to Extend Urban Services
Line to Include the Neighborhood Commercial Zoned Corner at EI Camino Real
and Viejo Camino (City-initiated)
4. RESOLUTION NO. 66-94 - General Plan Amendment to Extend Urban Services
Line to Include the Neighborhood Commercial Zoned Corner at EI Camino Real
and Del Rio (City-initiated)
D. REGULAR BUSINESS:
1. LAS ENCINAS TRAFFIC SAFETY SIGNAGE - Recommended Revisions
2. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ADVISORY COMMITTEE - Consideration of
Communications from the Planning Commission and Building and Construction
Board of Appeals
3. RETAINING THE EXISTING CURBARIL BRIDGE - Response from County Board
of Supervisor
4. RESOLUTION NO. 70-94 - Authorizing the Execution of an Agreement with
Arthur Blankenship to Maintain Open Space (APN #56-352-004/Santa Rosa
Road)
3
E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION:
1 . City Council
2. City Attorney
3. City Clerk
4. City Treasurer
5. City Manager
F. CLOSED SESSION:
The City Council will adjourn to a Closed Session for the Following Purposes:
1) LIABILITY CLAIMS:
Claimant: Rex Hendrix, Betty Hendrix and Darlene Frederick
Agency: City of Atascadero
2) CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR
Negotiator: City Manager
Employee Organizations: Service Employees International Union,
Atascadero Police Officers Association, Atascadero Sargent's
Service Organization,Atascadero Safety Technicians Organization
and Mid-Management Bargaining Unit
4
Approved as Submitted
Meeting Date: 7/26/94
ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL
JULY 12, 1994
MINUTES
The Mayor called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Councilperson Johnson led the
Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL:
Present: Councilmembers Carden,Johnson, Luna and Mayor Bewley
Absent: Councilmember Highland
Also Present: Muriel "Micki" Korba, City Treasurer and Lee Price, City
Clerk
Staff Present: Andy Takata, City Manager; Henry Engen, Community
Development Director; Art Montandon, City Attorney;
Brady Cherry, Director of Community Services; Russ
Scotten, Interim Finance Director; Mike McCain, Fire Chief;
Bud McHale, Police Chief and John Neil, Assistant City
Engineer
COUNCIL COMMENTS:
O Confirm City Council Committee Assignments (Mayor Bewley)
Mayor Bewley indicated that the Council Committee assignments had been made and
noted that a list of the appointments was included in the agenda packet.
PRESENTATIONS:
o Plaque of Appreciation to Harold Lee Carden, III - Planning Commissioner
Mayor Bewley presented a plaque to Hal Carden and extended gratitude for his service
on the City's Planning Commission.
CC 07/12/94
Page 1
o Tom Walters, Wil-Mar Disposal, Inc., of California Redemption Value
Refund (from Curbside Recycling Program).
Tom Walters, Wil Mar Disposal, Inc., provided copies of the City of Atascadero
Recycling Update dated July 1994 (see Exhibit "A"). Michele Velasco presented a
check to the Mayor for $5,239.45, representing California Redemption Value refunds.
COMMUNITY FORUM:
Lanny Dugar, 8330 Santa Rosa, described a situation that occurred at the Atascadero
Lake Park on July 4, 1994. He reported that he was offering free pony rides when
he was asked to leave by event organizers. He complained that he was then ordered
to leave by security guards who used abusive language and who also threatened him
with deadly force. Mr. Dugar asked the Council to consider controlling security
guards with weapons in the parks.
Connie King, San Luis Obispo YMCA representative, introduced herself and mentioned
that she had been working with Brady Cherry and the Community Services Depart-
ment in an effort to develop a community-wide recreational needs assessment. She
commented that she hoped that the "Y" could unite with the City in a joint venture
to develop programs.
Ray Jansen, 6655 Country Club Drive, spoke regarding social philosophy and asked
what is the soul of community life. He suggested that it is high time that society to
support and strengthen a social contract that guarantees that every person has a place
in society and a right to be there.
A. COMMITTEE REPORTS (The following represent ad hoc or standing commit-
tees. Informative status reports were given, as follows.):
1. S.L.O. Council of Governments(C0G)/Regional Transit
Authority(SLORTA) - Councilman Carden reported that SLORTA would
meet July 13, 1994 at 9:00 a.m. in San Luis Obispo.
2. Economic Round Table - Councilman Johnson announced that the round
table would meet Wednesday, July 20 at 7:30 p.m. at City Hall.
3. Highway 41 Realignment Community Advisory Committee -Henry Engen
noted that staff would schedule results of a neighborhood survey
regarding cul-de-sac design options for Magdelena and Magnolia Avenues
for Council consideration July 26th. The Committee's next meeting, he
added, is July 14th.
CC 07/12/94
Page 2
B. CONSENT CALENDAR:
1. RESOLUTION NO. 42-94 - Placing the Annual Payment for Assessment District
No. 8 (South San Gabriel) on the Property Taxes for the 1994-95 Fiscal Year
2. RESOLUTION NO. 67-94 - Recommending Continuation of Current Developer
Fee Schedule
3. RESOLUTION NO. 68-94 - Annual Ratification of the San Luis Obispo Council
of Governments Joint Powers Agreement for Fiscal Year 1994-95
4. FINAL APPROVAL OF THE AGREEMENT TO CONVEY REAL PROPERTY AND
THE JOINT OCCUPANCY AGREEMENT RELATING TO THE ACQUISITION OF
THE MASONIC TEMPLE
5. PAYMENT OF BILLS AND AUDITED PAYROLL FOR JUNE 1994
There were no questions or comments from the City Council or from the public.
MOTION: By Councilman Luna, seconded by Councilman Carden to approve
the Consent Calendar; motion carried 4:0 by ro// ca// vote.
C. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. RESOLUTION NO. 63-94 - Authorizing Placement of Delinquent Solid Waste
Charges on Property Taxes for Fiscal Year 1994-95
Russ Scotten provided the staff report and recommendation to approve.
Public Comments:
George Zidbeck, 1869 San Fernando Road, indicated that he was upset that City and
County governments are joining forces to collect fees for a private agency and
complained that the costs are too high.
Robert Carsley, 1215 Camino del Roble, complained that there are no limits on what
services tenants can order and yet the landlord is responsible for the bill. He asserted
that part of his delinquent bill is from a former tenant.
Michele Velasco, Wil-Mar Disposal, explained the billing process and emphasized that
arrangements can be made for payment. Wil-Mar, she said, was willing to work with
CC 07/12/94
Page 3
tenants and property owners. In addition, she noted that delinquent charges for this
year are substantially less than they were last year. Councilman Johnson inquired if
Wil-Mar notifies owners when a tenant is behind. Ms. Velasco indicated that they do
try, but noted that it isn't always clear if services are contracted by a tenant or
owner.
Mr. Carsley asserted that he has never heard from Wil-Mar.
Renee Silberman, 9210 Lucinda, remarked that many homeowners will be affected
and asked Wil-Mar to make an effort to contact an owner when a tenant is late.
Councilman Luna commented that the authorizing ordinance does not specify that
property owners will be notified if tenants are late paying their bill and asked Michele
Velasco how owners are notified of delinquency. Ms. Velasco reiterated that Wil-Mar
tries to contact owners when fees become delinquent, but pointed out that many
times there is no communication unless the delinquent party contacts Wil-Mar.
---End of Public Testimony---
MOTION: By Councilman Luna, seconded by Councilman Johnson to adopt
Resolution No. 63-94; motion passed 4:0 by ro//ca// vote.
2. RESOLUTION NO. 64-94 - Authorizing Placement of Annual Sewer Service
Charges on Property Taxes for Fiscal Year 1994-95
Henry Engen provided the staff report and recommendation to approve. There were
no questions or comments.
MOTION: By Councilman Carden, seconded by Councilman Luna to adopt
Resolution No. 64-94; motion passed 4:0 by ro// ca// vote.
3. RESOLUTION NO. 65-94 - General Plan Amendment to Extend Urban Services
Line to Include the Neighborhood Commercial Zoned Corner at EI Camino Real
and Viejo Camino (City-initiated)
4. RESOLUTION NO. 66-94 - General Plan Amendment to Extend Urban Services
Line to Include the Neighborhood Commercial Zoned Corner at EI Camino Real
and bel Rio (City-initiated)
Henry presented the staff report and recommendations for both items, #C-3 & C-4.
CC 07/12/94
Page 4
Public Comments:
Jim Edwards, 2800 EI Camino Real, pointed out that, if approved, Resolution No. 66-
94 would not make sewer accessible to the east side of EI Camino Real sourtherly of
the subject site. Henry Engen clarified that the extension of the Urban Services Line
does not allow for hook-up in Suburban Residential and clarified that there will be
urban standards on one side of street and rural on the other.
---End of Public Testimony---
Councilman Luna asked if there was potential for requiring an Environmental Impact
Report (EIR) for any proposed major expansion of the Urban Service Line. Henry
Engen reported that an EIR would be required to change large areas from Suburban
Residential (2 1/2 acre lot standards) to higher density. He explained that the former
City Council had not been interested in making a change in the density in the EI
Camino Real/Del Rio Road area. Councilman Johnson inquired whether staff was
concerned about capacity. Henry Engen advised that there was not a substantial
number of new lots that could be created in the northeast quadrant if the Urban
Service Line were to include the whole area.
Responding to inquiry from Councilman Carden, Henry Engen reported that extending
the Urban Service Line to include Suburban Residential areas mandates a change in
the present zoning and clarified that such a change could be done provided there were
also a General Plan text change. He also noted that, under the current General Plan,
it would not be possible for someone to tie into the sewer even if they chose to if
they are outside the Urban Service Line.
MOTION: By Councilman Luna, seconded by Councilman Carden to adopt
Resolution No. 65-94; motion passed 4:0 by roll call vote.
MOTION: By Councilman Luna, seconded by Councilman Carden to adopt
Resolution No. 66-94; motion passed 4:0 by roll call vote.
D. REGULAR BUSINESS:
1. LAS ENCINAS TRAFFIC SAFETY SIGNAGE - Recommended Revisions
John Neil provided background and recommendation to approve changes to the
existing signage in conformance with a modified version of the Level #1
recommendations made by Penfield & Smith (design engineer), as set forth in the staff
report. Using overhead transparencies, he illustrated the proposed revisions.
CC 07/12/94
Page 5
Councilman Johnson asked what the accident history was in the Las Encinas area.
Chief McHale remarked that there has been a very light history of accidents.
Councilman Luna noted that Penfield & Smith was not recommending a reduction in
the number of signs but recognized that it may be desirable to accept a lesser level
of safety in order to protect the visual aesthetics of the neighborhood. He asked the
City Attorney if this statement was essentially releasing them from any liability. Art
Montandon explained that it did and noted that the City would be considered liable in
an incident if it could be determined that the road design was a trap to the unwary
driver or if the City had been put on notice that there existed dangerous conditions.
Accident history, he added, puts the City "on notice". Mr. Montandon advised that
the liability for the City is quite low based upon the accident history and the signs that
are proposed to remain.
Councilman Johnson observed that it was difficult to envision how the area will look,
based upon the maps. He suggested that staff set up a demonstration to give the
neighbors and members of the City Council an opportunity to see it, provide input and
reach a reasonable compromise. Councilman Luna asked the City Manager if this was
possible. Andy Takata indicated that staff could produce demonstration corners as
outlined in staff's recommendation.
Public Comments:
Ron Lindsay, 8505 San Gregorio Road, spoke on behalf of residents in the Las Encinas
assessment district. He noted that the Chandler Ranch assessment district was to be
the model for assessment districts and pointed out there are hardly any signs in that
area. He suggested that the Council give consideration to removing all the signs and
simply placing one sign stating, "Winding Road - next 2.2 miles".
---End of Public Testimony---
There was consensus to approve the staff recommendation as proposed. In
addition, staff was directed to set up demonstration corners and meet with the
residents.
2. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ADVISORY COMMITTEE -Consideration of Communi-
cations from the Planning Commission and Building and Construction Board of
Appeals
Henry Engen provided the staff report and asked for Council direction regarding the
establishment of an Ad Hoc Development Review Committee. Councilman Luna
inquired about how much staff time this type of committee might require. Mr. Engen
suggested that approximately four meetings might be sufficient, adding that a year's
CC 07/12/94
Page 6
worth of monthly meetings would start cutting into a lot of staff time. He
recommended that staff walk the committee through the permit process, review
problems and propose recommendations for streamlining the process. He emphasized
that a clear purpose, input regarding membership and guidelines for reporting back to
Council needed to be outlined.
Councilman Johnson commented that it would be advantageous to evaluate all
departments and services eventually. For now, he added, it appears timely to look at
the building process and explained that he would prefer the committee narrow its'
focus to just that subject. Councilman Luna agreed.
Mayor Bewley suggested that membership include five to seven members appointed
by the Council. Specifically, he proposed that the committee include one member of
the Board of Appeals, one Planning Commissioner, a Council representative and two
at-large citizens. He emphasized that the purpose should be to improve procedures.
Public Comments:
Jim Edwards, Vice-Chairman of the Planning Commission, explained the Planning
Commission's position and noted that they were in support of a seven-member body.
He stated that the proposed scope of the committee would be to review the permit
and building processes as well as how these affect economic viability. Suggested
membership, he continued, consisted of one or two members of the Planning
Commission, a member of the Board of Appeals and a member of the Parks &
Recreation Commission. He stated that he did not envision a councilmember on the
ad hoc committee and was hoping that it maintain a "stand-alone" stance to remain
objective. Mr. Edwards also mentioned that the direction of the committee should be
left up to committee and proposed that the focus be formulated after the
appointments are made.
---End of Public Testimony---
Councilman Johnson asserted that the focus should be determined by the Council and
a councilmember should serve on the committee. Councilman Luna agreed and
pointed out that the taxpayers are the customers and they should be represented. He
indicated that he could support no more than a constrained review of the development
process with a goal to seek improvement.
Councilman Carden recommended that the chairpersons of the Planning Commission
and the Board of Appeals meet with members of staff and develop a specific charter,
time-lines and recommended list of members. Once done, he suggested, the matter
could come back for two formal actions: 1) membership composition and 2) defined
CC 07/12/94
Page 7
committee purpose.
The City Manager asked for additional direction regarding the types of people the
Council would like to serve as members-at-large. Mayor Bewley implied that there
should be citizen representatives who actually use the system; i.e., developers,
architects and builders. The Mayor also volunteered to represent the Council on the
committee.
There was Council concurrence that the Mayor would meet with staff and the
Chairpersons of the Planning Commission and the Board of Appeals to design the
committee and make recommendations for membership.
3. RETAINING THE EXISTING CURBARIL BRIDGE - Response from County Board
of Supervisor
Henry Engen requested direction from the City Council to propose to San Luis Obispo
County staff that an agreement be entered into to equally share the maintenance
costs associated with the Curbaril Bridge. He pointed out that two-thirds of the bridge
is located in the unincorporated areas of the County. The City Manager added that
emergency access to the unincorporated areas is for mutual aid (fire and police
services).
Councilman Luna pointed out that Supervisor Blakely had responded favorably to
taking the matter to the Board of Supervisors. He declared that he would not like to
see City staff involve County staff at this time when Supervisor Blakely has availed
himself to take it to the Board and suggested that the Mayor, on behalf of the City
Council, respond to the specific questions set forth in Supervisor Blakely's letter and
ask him to work with County staff.
There was consensus to direct staff to draft a letter to Supervisor Blakely for
the Mayor's signature, as proposed by Councilman Luna.
4. RESOLUTION NO. 70-94 - Authorizing the Execution of an Agreement with
Arthur Blankenship to Maintain Open Space (APN #56-352-004/Santa Rosa
Road)
Art Montandon provided the staff report and recommendation to adopt Resolution No.
70-94 authorizing the execution of an agreement with Art & Betty Blankenship. The
City Attorney mentioned that Mr. & Mrs. Blankenship have asked that they be allowed
to pay off the amount at any time and indicated that this provision could easily be
added to the contract.
CC 07/12/94
Page 8
Public Comments:
Art Blankenship, 8300 Santa Rosa Road, indicated that he was requesting the addition
of a provision allowing for early pay-off, as outlined by the City Attorney. He also
noted that he had agreed that the property will be maintained as a ranch but reiterated
earlier comments that the land is a flood zone area and is unsuitable for development.
Mr. Blankenship proclaimed that it was not fair to assess him for sewer when the land
is a flood zone and not useful as a home site.
Councilman Johnson asked the City Attorney for the rationale behind the fifteen-year
provision. Mr. Montandon explained that it represents the same time-frame for
payment on the property tax rolls. Councilman Luna commented that he had been
opposed to the 15 year provision and had asked that it be deleted. Mr. Blankenship
argued that he had originally proposed that the property never be assessed unless a
building permit is issued and reiterated that the land is not suitable for a home.
Lanny Dugar, 8330 S. Rosa Road, spoke in support of Mr. Blankenship's position. He
urged the Council to be aware of how the situation came about and how the
Blankenship's were ultimately included in the assessment district. He argued that the
Blankenships should not have to participate in the district because they are not
receiving a benefit from the sewer. Mr. Dugar implored the Council to do anything
possible to relieve the Blankenship's of the burden of the district.
Eric Greening, 7365 Valle, spoke in favor of the initial intentions of Mr. Blankenship.
He emphasized that the agreement puts economic pressure on the parcel and asked
the Council to relieve the Blankenships from participation. Mr. Greening also
commented that the City lacks a coherent, overall policy for forming assessment
districts and suggested that consistent ground rules be established.
Rita Fernandez, Mountain View resident, also spoke in favor of the Blankenship's
request to be removed from the district.
---End of Public Testimony---
Responding to inquiry from Councilman Carden and Councilman Johnson, Henry
Engen reported that the land does, in fact, constantly flood but added that while it
may be costly, every lot is buildable with the right engineering. He stated that there
is an assumption that the parcel is a buildable lot because it is accessible to sewer and
noted that the lot is included, as directed by the City Council, in the district and is part
of the formula.
Councilman Luna asserted that the agreement essentially forces the Blankenships to
CC 07/12/94
Page 9
develop the lot. He contended that the agreement offers an opportunity to give the
community the enjoyment of farmland/open space until the sale of, or development
of, the property. He reiterated that he was not in favor of the fifteen years provision.
Mayor Bewley proclaimed that he would not support the agreement and reiterated that
he had voted against the matter before. He stated the land should be assessed like
all the other lots in the district.
MOTION: By Councilman Luna, seconded by Councilman Johnson to adopt
Resolution No. 70-94 as amended by deleting provision #5(a);
motion failed 2:2 (Councilman Carden/Mayor Bewley voting in
opposition). No action.
MOTION: By Councilman Carden, seconded by Councilman Luna to adopt
Resolution No. 70-94; motion carried 3.1 (Mayor Bewley voting
in opposition). (Note: The adoption included approval of amending the
agreement to include a provision allowing the Blankenships to pay off the
assessment at an earlier date, if so desired).
E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION:
1. City Clerk
The City Clerk mentioned that applications were being accepted for the Planning
Commission, Parks & Recreation Commission, Traffic Committee and Community
Services Foundation Board of Directors until Friday, July 15th at 5:00 p.m. and
encouraged anyone interested to apply.
2. City Treasurer
Micki Korba reported that a $1,300,000 Tax and Revenue Anticipation Note (TRANS)
the following day and added that this would afford the City operating capital.
3. City Manager
Andy Takata provided an overview of the agenda for the meeting of July 26, 1994
and announced that reporter Steve Whitely was leaving the Country News and taking
a position with the Telegram-Tribune.
F. CLOSED SESSION:
The Mayor adjourned to Closed Session at 9:02 p.m. for the following purposes:
CC 07/12/94
Page 10
w
1) LIABILITY CLAIMS:
Claimant: Rex Hendrix, Betty Hendrix and Darlene Frederick
Agency: City of Atascadero
2) CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR
Negotiator: City Manager
Employee Organizations: Service Employees International Union,
Atascadero Police Officers Association, Atascadero Sergeant's
Service Organization,Atascadero Safety Technicians Organization
and Mid-Management Bargaining Unit
At 9:50 p.m., Closed Session was adjourned. The City Attorney announced that the
City Council gave no authority to settle Item #1 . In addition, he reported that on-
going labor negotiations with the associations listed above were conducted.
THE NEXT MEETING OF THE ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL WILL BE TUESDAY,
JULY 26, 1994 AT 7:00 P.M.
MINUTES RECORDED AND PREPARED BY:
LEE PRICE, City Clerk
Attachment: Exhibit "A" - (Wil-Mar Disposal, Inc.)
CC 07/12/94
Page 11
CC 07/12/94
EXHIBIT "A"
Page 1
City of Atascadero
Recycling Update
July 1994
Since August 1993, Wil-star Disposal has promoted the Recycling
Program through diverse awareness activities . We have purchased a
cute, fuzzy "Roo" costume and educational coloring books to use in
conjunction with classroom presentations and events that the
Atascadero Recycling Committee participate in.
We have expanded the Recycling Program
* Over 50 commercial cardboard -accounts collected "l to 3
times per week
* Averaging over 16 tons of recyclables per month
* Expansion of used motor oil drop-off
* Sorting commingled recyclables and baling commodities
* Continue saturation of recycling bins
* Increase green waste collection-
Enclosed is the monthly California Redemption Value tCRV) from 7193
- 6194 for Aluminum, Glass and PET. The formula used to determine
the rebate is the total CRV minus Sorting Cost paid to SLOCO
Re+'ycles and minus the Special Event Costs
It is our hope that by changing the methods of handling our
recyclables it will allow us to maintain rates while meeting the
requirements of California State Law AB 939.
CC 07/12/94
EXHIBIT "A"
k Page 2
Atascadero CRV 7/93 to 6/94
Commodity: Commodity: Commodity:
Glass Aluminum PET
7/93 ( 1,072.78 7/93 765.41 7/93 663.35
8/93 956.46 8/93 682.42 8/93 591.42
9/93 1,169.10 9/93 834.11 9/93 722.92
10/93 1,140.81 10/93 813.96 10/93 705,41
11/93 1,099.73 11/93 784.65 11/93 709.30
12/93 1,467.10 12/93 1,046.76 12/93 946.24
1/94 1,033.46 1/94 726.11 1/94 656.38
2/94 923.60 2/94 648.92 2/94 586.61
3/94 1,059.80 3/94 985.73 3/94 531.15
4/94 832.39 4/94 774.21 4/94 417.18
5/94 1,187.19 5/94 1,104.22 5/94 595.01
6/94 1,085.72 6/94 833.31 6/94 647.72
Total $13,028.14 Total $9,999.81 Total $7,772.69
Sort Costs Costs of Recycle Events
Sept. 1993 2,357.00
7/93 1,688.82 March 1994 2,582.27
8/93 1,505.70 -----------
9/93 1,804.44 Total $4,939.27
10/93 1,795.92
11/93 1,731.24
12/93 2,309.58
1/94 1,602.30
2/94 1,431.78
3/94 1,741.22
4/94 1,182.73
5/94 2,109.70
6194 1,718.49
Total $20,621.92
Total CRV $30,800.64
Less: Sort Costs - $20,¢21.92
------------
Net CRV 'aVaOv 175.72_.
Recycle Event Costs „ $4,939.27
Cash Retained $5,239.45