The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda Packet 12/14/2004 CITY OF ATASCA DERO 1918 1 9 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Tuesday, December 14, 2004 7:00 P.M. Atascadero Lake Pavilion 9315 Pismo St. Atascadero, California REDEVELOPMENT_AGENCY: 6:30 P.M. • CLOSED SESSION: (immediately following Redevelopment.Agency Meeting) 1. PUBLIC COMMENT— CLOSED SESSION 2. CALL TO ORDER a. Conference with legal counsel — Existing Litigation (Govt. Code Sec. 54956.9 (a)) 1. City of Atascadero v. Dorsey et al. b. Personnel: City Attorney (Government Code 54957) c. Anticipated Litigation - Initiation of Litigation — One Potential Case (Govt. Code Sec. 54956.9 (c)) 3. ADJOURN 4. CLOSED SESSION REPORT REGULAR SESSION: 7:00 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Council Member Pacas 1 ROLL CALL: Mayor Luna Mayor Pro Tem Scalise Council Member Clay Council Member O'Malley Council Member Pacas INTRODUCTIONS: COMMUNITY FORUM: (This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wanting to address the Council on any matter not on this agenda and over which the Council has jurisdiction. Speakers are limited to five minutes. Please state your name and address for the record before making your presentation. The Council may take action to direct the staff to place a matter of business on a future agenda. A maximum of 30 minutes will be allowed for Community Forum, unless changed by the Council.) APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Roll Call • PRESENTATIONS: 1. Proclamation commending Atascadero Native Tree Association (ANTA) for outstanding service 2. Loaves & Fishes — 20th Anniversary 3. Robert "Grigger" Jones— Planning Commission Service Award ELECTION CERTIFICATION: 1. Reciting the Fact of the General Municipal Election November 2, 2004 ■ City Clerk recommendation: Council adopt draft Resolution, reciting the fact of the General,Municipal Election held on November 2, 2004, declaring the result and such other matters as provided by law. [City Clerk] OATHS OF OFFICE: 1. Administration of Oaths of Office — Newly-elected Council Members George Luna, Wendy Scalise, and Jerry Clay, will be sworn in by City Clerk Marcia McClure Torgerson. is 2 CITY COUNCIL REORGANIZATION: 1. Council Appointment of Mayor — The City Clerk will accept ,nominations from the Council Members 2. Council Appointment of Mayor Pro Tem The new Mayor will accept nominations from the Council Members COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS: (On their own initiative, Council Members may make a brief announcement or a brief report on their own activities. Council Members may ask a question for clarification, make a referral to staff or take action to have staff place a matter of business on a future agenda. The Council may take action on items listed on the Agenda.) A. CONSENT CALENDAR: (All items on the consent calendar are considered to be routine and non-controversial by City staff and will be approved by one motion if no member of the Council or public wishes to comment or ask questions. If comment or discussion is desired by anyone, the item will be removed from the consent calendar and will be • considered in the listed sequence with an opportunity for any member of the public to address the Council concerning the item before action is taken.) 1. _City Council Meetinq Minutes - November 9, 2004 ■ City Clerk Recommendation: Council approve the City Council meeting minutes of November 9, 2004. [City Clerk] 2. October 2004 Treasurer's Report ■ Fiscal Impact: None. ■ Recommendation: Council approve the City Treasurer's report for October 2004. [City Treasurer] 3. October 2004 Accounts Payable and Payroll ■ Fiscal Impact: Total expenditures for all funds is $1,711,246.13. ■ Recommendation: Council approve certified City accounts payable, payroll and payroll vendor checks for October 2004. [Administrative Services] 4. City Council 2005 Meeting Schedule ■ Fiscal Impact: None. ■ Recommendation: Council approve City Council 2005 Meeting Schedule. [City Manager] 3 B. MANAGEMENT REPORTS: 1. Recreation Center Site Selection ■ Fiscal Impact: Will be determined once FEMA and grant monies are set. ■ Recommendations: Council: 1. Approve the selection of the Traffic Way/Hay & Feed/City Corporation Yard site for development of the Recreation Center building. 2. Direct the City Manager to proceed with the development a Youth/Community Center building and site plan for the Traffic Way location. 3. Direct the City Manager to prepare a plan for the relocation of the Corporation Yard and the removal of unnecessary waste water related facilities. [Community Services] 2. Solar Energy System Permit (4515 Rosita Ave./Brom) ■ Fiscal Impact: None. ■ Recommendation: Council give staff direction. [Community Development] • 3. Review of Assessment Districts and Special Taxes ■ Fiscal Impact: $20,000 from the General Fund Reserve and Tree Replacement Fund. ■ Recommendations: Council: 1. Appropriate $20,000 from the General Fund Reserve and Tree Replacement Fund, direct staff to hire consultants to perform an initial study of a citywide assessment district or special tax, carry out polling to determine levels of support, and if necessary conduct community workshops; and, 2. Direct staff to report findings regarding assessment districts and special taxes to the City Council at a future date. [City Manager] 4. Budget Calendar ■ Fiscal Impact: None. ■ Recommendation: Council set a public hearing for January 11, 2005 to hear community priorities for the 2005-2007 budget cycle. [Administrative Services] 4 C. COMMITTEE REPORTS: (The newly elected Mayor will be assigning committee members to the following committees:) Air Pollution Control District (APCD) Atascadero State Hospital Advisory Board Atascadero Youth Task Force City/ Schools Committee (2) County Mayor's Round Table Economic Vitality Corporation, Board of Directors(EVC) Finance Committee(2) Integrated Waste Management Authority (IWMA) League of California Cities — Grassroots Network Local Agency Formation Commissions (LAFCO) North County Homeless Coalition S.L.O. Council of Govts.(SLOCOG)/S.L.O.Regional Transit Authority (SLORTA) Water Committees (2) D. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION: 1. City Council 2. City Clerk • 3. City Treasurer 4. City Attorney 5. City Manager E. ADJOURNMENT: Please note: Should anyone challenge any proposed development entitlement listed on this Agenda in court, that person may be limited to raising those issues addressed at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at or prior to this public hearing. Correspondence submitted at this public hearing will be distributed to the Council and available for review in the City Clerk's office. I, Shannon Sims, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Atascadero, declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing agenda for the December 14, 2004 Regular Session of the Atascadero City Council was posted on December 7th, 2004 at the Atascadero City Hall Annex, 6905 EI Camino Real, Suite 6, Atascadero, CA 93422 and was available for public review in the Customer Service Center at that location. Signed this 7th day of December 2004 at Atascadero, California. a t l m .In 'V.1� � /� Shannon Sims, Deputy City Clerk City of Atascadero 5 City of Atascadero WELCOME TO THE ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL MEETING The City Council meets in regular session on the second and fourth Tuesday of each month at 7:00 p.m., at theAv Atascadero Pavilion on the Lake,9315 Pismo St., Atascadero. Matters are considered by the Council in the order of the printed Agenda. Copies of the staff reports or other documentation relating to each item of business referred to on the Agenda are on file in the office of the City Clerk and are available for public inspection during City Hall Annex business hours at the Central Receptionist counter and on our website, www.atascadero.org. An agenda packet is also available for public review at the Atascadero Library, 6850 Morro Road. Contracts, Resolutions and Ordinances will be allocated a number once they are approved by the City Council The minutes of this meeting will reflect these numbers. All documents submitted by the public during Council meetings that are either read into the record or referred to in their statement will be noted in the minutes and available for review in the City Clerk's office. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in a City meeting or other services offered by this City, please contact the City Manager's Office or the City Clerk's Office, both at (805) 461-5000. Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time when services are needed will assist the City staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting or service. TO SPEAK ON AGENDA ITEMS Members of the audience may speak on any item on the agenda. The Mayor will identify the subject, staff will give their report, and the Council will ask questions of staff. The Mayor will announce when the public comment period is open and will request anyone interested to address the Council regarding the matter being considered to step up to the podium. If you wish to speak for, against or comment in any way: • You must approach the podium and be recognized by the Mayor • Give your name and address (not required) • Make your statement • All comments should be made to the Mayor and Council • No person shall be permitted to make slanderous, profane or negative personal remarks concerning any other individual, absent or present • All comments limited to 5 minutes (unless changed by the Council) • No one may speak for a second time until everyone wishing to speak has had an opportunity to do so, and no one may speak more than twice on any item. If you wish to use a computer presentation to support your comments, you must notify the City Clerk's office at least 24 hours prior to the meeting. Access to hook up your laptop to the City's projector will be provided. You are required to submit to the City Clerk a printed copy of your presentation for the record. Please check in with the City Clerk before the meeting begins to announce your presence and turn in the printed copy. The Mayor will announce when the public comment period is closed, and thereafter, no further public comments will be heard by the Council TO SPEAK ON SUBJECTS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA Under Agenda item,"COMMUNITY FORUM", the Mayor will call for anyone from the audience having business with the Council to: • Please approach the podium and be recognized • Give your name and address (not required) • State the nature of your business This is the time items not on the Agenda may be brought to the Council's attention. A maximum of 30 minutes will be allowed for Community Forum (unless changed by the Council). TO HAVE ITEMS PLACED ON AGENDA All business matters to appear on the Agenda must be in the Office of the City Manager 14 days preceding the Council meeting. Should you have a matter you wish to bring before the Council, please mail or bring a written communication to 10 the City Manager's office in City Hall prior to the deadline. 6 Proclamation of the Atascadero City Council Recognizing the Atascadero Native Tree Association (ANTA) for outstanding service to the City of Atascadero WHEREAS, the Atascadero Native Tree Association(ANTA) has performed many outstanding service projects for many years, and the City of Atascadero has been named a Tree City 'USA by the National Arbor Day Foundation; and WHEREAS, the Atascadero Native Tree Association has helped the city and the a the community to meet`four standards: A :community tree ordinance, a tree :board, a comprehensive community forestry program and an Arbor Day observation and proclamation; and WHEREAS, the Atascadero Native Tree Association provides the leadership and energy necessary to provide the components to becoming a Tree City USA; and WHEREAS, the Atascadero Native Tree Association provides outstanding service to the local community to enhance our urban forest through tree .planting, educational programs and demonstration projects such as the landscaping in front of the Pavilion on the Lake and the Colony House landscaping; and WHEREAS, the City Council and city staff greatly appreciate the volunteers who make up the Atascadero Native Tree Association and have provided countless hours that have significantly benefited the entire community. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Atascadero hereby acknowledges the citizenship and stewardship carriedout by the Atascadero Native Tree Association, and commends the organization and its volunteer members for the tremendous work on behalf of the City of Atascadero and its urban forest. WITNESS THE OFFICIAL SEAL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO: Dr. George Luna, Mayor City of Atascadero December 14,2004 7 Election Certification: 12/14/04 A e ArA'cAn�,D/ Atascadaro City Council Marcia McClure Torgerson., City Clerk Reciting the Fact of the General Municipal Election Held on November 2, 2004 .RECOMMENDATION: Council adopt the draft Resolution, reciting the fact of the General Municipal Election held on November 2, 2004, declaring the result and such other matters as provided by law. DISCUSSION: The General Municipal Election was held on November 2, 2004. California Elections Code §10262 states that the City Council shall meet to declare the result of the election upon certification of results by the County Election Department. I The California Elections Code. §10262 & 10264 also states that the Council shall adopt a resolution reciting the fact of the election, including a statement of the results. Total voter registration for the City of Atascadero was 16,960; an increase of more than 1800 over the total voter registration for the year 2002. Atascadero voters were asked to vote for three Council Members; the final official results are attached to this report. FISCAL IMPACT: None. ATTACHMENTS: Draft Resolution Final Official Results 8 DRAFT RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA RECITING THE FACT OF THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD ON NOVEMBER 2, 2004, DECLARING THE RESULT AND SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS PROVIDED BY LAW WHEREAS, a General Municipal Election was held and conducted in the City of Atascadero,California, on Tuesday,November 2, 2004, as required by law; and WHEREAS, notice of the election was given in time, form and manner as provided by law; that voting precincts were properly established; that election officers were appointed and that in all respects the election was held and conducted and the votes were cast, received and canvassed and the returns made and declared in time, form and manner as required by.the provisions of the Elections Code of the State of California for the holding of elections in general law cities;and WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 2004-046 adopted June 08, 2004, the County Election Department canvassed the returns of the election and has certified the results to,this City Council, the results are received, attached and made a part hereof as "Exhibit A". NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA,DOES RESOLVE,DECLARE,DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1 That the whole number of ballots cast in the precincts except absent voter ballots and provisional ballots was 13,454. Than the whole number of absent voter ballots and provisional ballots cast in the City was 15,160, making a total of 28,614 ballots cast in the City. SECTION 2. That the names of persons voted for at the election for Member of the City Council are as follows: George Luna, Wendy Scalise,Jerry L. Clay, Sr., Ellen 136raud, and Ann Ketcherside. SECTION 3. That the number of votes given at each precinct and the number of votes given in the City to each of the persons above named for the respective offices for which the persons were candidates and for and against the measure were as listed in Exhibit "A attached. SECTION 4. The City Council does declare and determine that: George Luna was elected as Member of the City Council for the full term of four years; Wendy Scalise was elected as Member of the City Council for the full term of four years; and Jerry L. Clay, Sr. was elected as Member of the City Council for the full term of four years. 9 City of Atascadero Draft Resolution Page 2 SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall enter on the records of the City Council of the City, a statement of the result of the election,showing: (1)The whole number of ballots cast in the City; (2) The names of the persons voted for; (3) For what office each person was voted for; (4) The number of votes given at each precinct to each person; (5) The total number of votes given to each person. SECTION 6. That the City Clerk shall immediately make and deliver to each of the persons"so elected a Certificate of Election signed by the City Clerk and authenticated; that the City Clerk shall also administer to each person elected the Oath of Office prescribed in the Constitution of the State of California and shall have them subscribe to it and file it in the office of the City Clerk. Each and all of the persons so elected shall then be inducted into the .respective office to which they have been elected. SECTION 7. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions. On Motion by Council Member and seconded by Council Member the foregoing Resolution was adopted on the following roll-call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ADOPTED: December 14, 2004 CITY OF ATASCADERO: ATTEST: Dr. George Luna, Mayor Marcia McClure Torgerson,City Clerk 10 CERTIFICATE OF THE COUNTY CLERK RESULTS OF CANVASS OF ALL VOTES CAST NOVEMBER 2, 2004 CONSOLIDATED GENERAL ELECTION CITY OF ATASCADERO 1,JULIE L.RODEWALD, County Clerk-Recorder of the County of San Luis Obispo, do hereby certify that pursuant to law l did canvass the returns of the votes cast at the above referenced election in the City of Atascadero on November 2, 2004, and that a photocopy of the Statement of Votes Cast to which this certificate is attached, shows the number of votes cast in said city for each candidate for the office of Member of the City Council and that the totals shown for each candidate for the office of Member of the City Council in said city and in each of the respective precincts therein,are full,true and correct. WITNESS, my hand and Official Seal this 29"day of November, 2004. JULI L. ODEWALD, County Clerk-Recorder BIC V e* to N O N.N .-. ca y N OU F o00 000 0 0 0 00o 0 0 0 000 000 000 000 0� Q NSM MN t O[�oD oD vt�o 00.�r� ObO OhN h VI Ol V).O� V co T til b Ol O V) 1D n V') Cl M 1P Vt 00 W Vf h m O 0\ Q Vl V 'R O.•• V N V N lV N �-+ M M M O O O O O ""V) N N N N m V) T N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N NIN N'NIN N N N N N N N N ..7 000 McIn ol;C> oo rn Mtn 2C> .00000 I �N Vii N�V NN VNi 000 . h00 H) ODO W N000 nbR V�N� t000 ��N N7 o 00 0a o o e e 0 0 0 o e o o 0 0 0 0 0 D e e o`0 e e o 00\0 h aD g R 00'N Vl M N 0o C`M(7\ 00%0 r, h MNN NO Vl D\h )p N N N 0 Ol Mh 41 ON OOl 0bVl M Vl VIn N m m N NN v) V NN MN N� N N N NN N N N'N NN N N 0 N N Ol M M Ol N Ol C"W h Ol y 00 a N O (N M V l OD M O M N N t7 h h Q N\0 N � N N N.. O O 0o 00'h h 00 'M oD 00\D� V)O Vl V h za N ^�'+M N Nc N--v N�--�R N NR Cq 3� 000 000 oe 0 000 o e o 00 D 00 00 'e ooD 00 w -\OhN N Vl V)N O U)O 10 .•.0010 00l Vl \DhN V. h0\D 0 •-.M A Vl 7 h O:O CT d'Ol N O M N Vl h O tD Q V1 M.••.h -N V)M M til N' N h 00 00 00 h 00 n b h\0 Vl h 1D !�Q)p Vl V1 Vl h 00 h 1--h h N.1-:V t- w NON Vlb bM m V)00M V 0\ M 00\0�{ h\DM +O zj �iT. - .�..N Oo\D Vl t�b M N.M 1D \DMO b'V O h\0 V oo V)7 -h)O N 00 V" O � F-, w U 'C/] ooa 000 000 0%D 000 000 000 000 oe e o b O o0 ..b� UtnO 1' �R 00 00..rN b V h hi-1 a Q Outh Vla� nN h vtM7 OhO. V)f+l et Mh Rah OMM Nh U Vl\D Vi r t-.h %0%0 10 00\D t- M M w b\0 b n\0 10 b n 10 00-41%0 Ol V' ra N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N p N N N N N N N N N N N N. W O CJ N n O�0%0 l'� 0ONI V M\0 cha 01~O 000 °\0 NON W CNM NM V� N N V) M N V 1 .- .- N N N'* N N v l N N C M N V) N N V 1 M N w � N h00 00 M-. Mah 00 r- .NNd n0l O�v 00 M.- \DN U) A Ol MN NM)O V1O%0 lO.-�I1 Oh00 MA VI C400 et oo NO McOID MO WW C•Moo MNh MM\D N MNw MNh N00a eq\o MN\D MN �Q U 205> t--i o00 000 000 000 000 —o.- o00 00o aww HOO Ho> V Vl OI 0\VTR O M M OlN-+ 0`N hN0) MOOS M d' M'+C' h c* h� V• 00 +�M Vl M N V) ..N. N N Vl N M N N V'1 N 10 'V N 1D M N W H 1--{ -w Ol oo t� )O M Ol oo V7 M ...t0 h V).�I1D Ol N.•• NON 1D V)'.-. N 1D R�O `S h O OIO 1�NOl .h..)pQ O\ ^Nb OmDD ^O )O V11� af>0CT MNIn ..QID 0 10 �Gl to 'W C>11711' 7 h h� rq"1 NN Q 'N Cl000 NOh V1MOo Mlp Ol M^+C W h V O\M 00 OO h OD h V7 Vt\0.r \D Vl N QM00 h V O NN[t RM00 RM0 V M00 ht�l O\ her ONl .ham O � N d O m U> \D Vl V)Vl Vl Vt Vl h V) 00 co W M M M CT P ut 7OOO vt v)h Ol 0\Ol OOO OOO (N C14 O. . CT _ O C b h (� 3� O D C %IF IB O^ GO❑ N 00 C7 M DD V b0 V') O0" 1p 00 t� 0 OD OD" 01 00'lu O o0 w h_ y h N tn.^ y y o•c a[i avo.5 a°i v .5 y— .5 u _o a .r c yUPDdFUPDQHQWQt��a°QF�a°QFD-pw°dF0a°dFUD°dFUa°dFC) < ti U U U U U 12 O M.-+ 00 4-' N N as H e e e\ e e o \e a e e e o e e v e o •o e e \e e e ao N 00 ^M V1 0•.-. M O.vi O+ C�Mb II0 li OHO O 1poq M V: mv R en V:.V: v my �.j ON^ hO CSN riNM M 0�.+ O^;+ NNN 'NN N NNN NN U N N N N N N N N N N N^N N N N N N N N N N N N N N tV a N mO\N Ori bD\Y1 \0 00 00 Ol ON en vO\m -v 0,m vO, O M N O�D�O v1 M 00 r M... r m r M r M [R�a MN V1 N NV- .....N O\C C OAC et UR V O. m N\0 m N�0 m N O m N 0 o ev e o e e o e e o 0 D o e a o e e e e o e o e V1 V�1 tT O•v.N b 00 C2 0 b r M O,00 m 00 a N o CS O O,m�O O (n\0 m b C4 C-i N NNNC11 N M y N N N N Cq NN -NN N N N N N N N O h m N Q^ v r-4 v N',M. OWN o0000 !oCo. e4 017, eq ON NOS - N rn O.OO Oo0 00 fAvN SONT bN O� bNT %N z _ N N V1 N N'v ^..M v)0\v "0�v Vl Ol v h O� MC-4 MN�O MN�O m W 3U v mr C0vm a M NM 00 mr- eov ooe eo oNeO 00 e eae oee eke W 000 Ci rr Vi M 00 ..., Q M v O 0.O O�N h Vl oo- v a t� n 0\00 \0 C,r Ol 00 O1 00 h cV 0�O O h 00 n t-00 t- r.00 t- r 00 C a I-7 W N r O, O kA V) _ f.y a ( U •� o0 r v� r�0m eno^ 000 o o0o r o:2 .No o b ob bob b o O W N N N ... N N ... ^ ^N N e a e o e e o e e e Ome ma Cq e%Ne eDOe C eDOe C %OeN(4 We O�o OV0 Neq a V,y �CrUj+ ✓ N�rD�NrIOtp6,tN 10 OGr N NN w 00 NN00'n�C 0�Q t� t��D t� hNN N N N N N N N N N N N N N Nl OO - N 00 p\ 000 00 O M O� �D M O� �O m 0� �D m O r^ 'U R V1 N to 00 O 00 Vf vn O h'd'O� N V1 r Oh m 00 Ol m 00 01 O1 00 O�C\ V.l V1 M N V1 N N e+1 N\0 N m Vl N MN t-R N V r N v t, N'T N a0 p veer ven vmr vM W 00 010b v•-+Vl rry Ohr rNO\ %0m0, �OMo. OMD` bM h Nvb mrO 000 MN oo O OU aO W y V 1 t N\O -v N r V 1 N r N v r M•-+v N 00 0 (4 0 0 0 N 00 0 N 0 O f/•-I Y Vn m Oh Vl M T V)M Ga U a zo�> f H 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O C.0 O O O O N^M W N M N^M a4 N hN000 V Nn Rv 000 v VWiC v Nnh V Qhi h a by h 6v Moo.-.m r,v m oo M 70 m w .Orr. mO�N 00MN r�0m V)0b Vl Ob N .Mn DD N M h•�I OD V7 V1 m 00 00 r V1 Vl r N 'v O v O\O 0\ V)O V1 N O Vl V1.0 Vl Vl C V�N 00 Vl M Ol h M Vl 00 O O1 O, h r v r r v r r v r r C� v�00 vN�O V C, vO Vl. v O�n tzl U> D` mMm 0.00 Mmm 000000 vvv .000 000 000 OG O. N N N v v v r r h �p�p�0 O�O�0� �p �p�p �p\0 b S' \0 V%C O\O,0\ O.a Ol 010, z o a a� o• Oz 6z 00 o a O 0 En oo N eo m 10on toZ d F u 3 ^' n5�n 8 v 5 ami^ 10 oN.5 cu 5 �— z� El E-spa°dE0-�a°d.[-��a°d[-°p4L. C)P..QFFa°.QF mza°¢F ow°QF �¢a°,¢ U U U U zU F Q� U w 13 O M N N ��1 R M 7 V�C 'd', t+1 V''c7 M eY V t'1 V;V M Q N N N N N N N N N C4�4 fV N N N eV N N fV fV N N N V tV fV N N N N N N N I N N N N N N N N N N N N m C rnm 'R m ON In nrn rn r m.M. n Ch In V O� �" C V rnQ d'rnC 7rnR R rnR C.rn V. 7 rn V M rn� V rn N�D M N D M N'O m N'D m N�O m N Co M N 0 o e e e(0 o o e o Ch 0 e(0 e o 0 e e 0 e o � M rn W M..rn OO m rn 00 m rn o0 m rn o0 In m %D rnMb 'I%q rnm,D Oi m,D rn In,q rnm,D rnM� a1- CN N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N.N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N NC4 ol N N rn N rn b N rn b N rn b N T b N rn N rn N rn N D` Q C vlrnV w1rnC Y'1rn� hrnd' \n rqVD ON,prn' V�1 ON,'rn7 %D Wb MN,D mN,D MN,D MN,O en eq mN,D In eq mN 3� 'e oe eoo eeo aeo eae ao a cvrn 1 °o - 0O 00rn t-wrn ��rn Q�a n t�oo t- n oo t- t-oo t- t-- a W 00 N O N N O N N o N N O N N O N N O N N O 2 101 OO O OG >C H N ......iN .�.....N ...N ON b ON pN to a ¢ eek ewe ego ��e eso �: N o f-N b h N b r N D O N D O N � C� �DnN �D rN b�N b�N nNot- t;�n r� [7, a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N' O W rn b m a, b M rn b M rn b m rn o m a, b M rn b m rn b m V' 00 rn w rn m w rn rn w 0\a,00 rnrn00 -rn O,00 rn rn co olrn a Q U] O O n NRh ('4 N V n NeTh Non NSTn Nvn NV h' `�mh V V m h Q mn eTMh Q M n et mn Q M a: N ¢ rn b m rn b m rn %D m rn b M rn b m rn b M O, ,D m rn M morn o orn morn rnOrn rn0rn rnOrn o,0ol rno O NODO IN O N000 N000 N000 No0O N 0 O Now h Gy rn Inmrn V1 mrn Vl M o, Nmrn In mrn h m O, In In 0\ M'1 In W 1��y U ¢ zOa>m N NP-4 t+1 N•-.m N m N...m N m N.-+M N�.r M N.. a4, W > yc E > O >Ho> H a o Hj n m 7 n M V n Cl 7 r R n o n W ,C.., E � O ! R T V1C O V 7 D V V O, h70, Vm on, In'r on, OC zD C mm h O,D v1 OI,D. �n O,O vl O b �n O GV O b h C W m� ^MCD h DD O D -.Nry �.M.N ��M.. �J F> C-4 N F�•7�•li d0 v, vi.0 v, V�O�n in O�n of O�n v1 O In In O V1 vn O V) v�C 7 h n v rh d' n h R +01 m nbM C Ov1 C'O Vl V Ov1 0'OM Q O h ROvI �7 C O \0:2 n,D M A n7 o - W U 0 000 000 000 000 000 oc U O�,rn rn 0\rn ON C7, rn�� 10�� bb b b.fir y b hDO 010101 01010 010101 O,ol �i> EnF Q 2 O F �¢ A O F N W �- N Q a dO' O W �¢ w0 d2 d u. w w oO Oa �O O M a°�i qq d c c_ c�0 _ °4°a �x on« �`3 vF� m� O- O� O d d� w v, „� W�•r y"' C d"� W F �a dF d oA oy o� o ON op oy oA o a, o D o- c� o FU Fo- Q�a dF oa< w'qa, oa dF �aa.dF oa.dF P: rn d F F tri E U d cn U 14 d' [� N N N O - Ntlo C4 CO 94 b m N b W M Ot 00 N C4 N N N N 10 MN%p W W o?vo c .. A t p. � h oo ti za O z N FSI: z¢ (� W U e e e o N b h N N N N(4NN N ��//�� Q. 00 as en a9 c7 (� N U amorn W 6 vrn vNie °Onrn W �yy O w q O V ¢ z0� v U �jU M N�-+M aWw �� o o z z n M y F-� p� �v o� Q F-1 E 0.1 CD\0 � F O W U 7 O O O O O O d C F o w Q F F 15 O M --+ 00 W N N' O A H � Z H W .H a za Wok aN � N W W 0-4 U w p W ZZ � x �e� Ivo owe ewe vee evo ar�J W 00 r, —coo o M— aoo ovN oov, ro .� O O O ImM F•--1 W V O h OO C OCO COO Or+�-+ C) C-�O OCC 000 -- 0 (� O G N r O� M 00.••. O�M N'T�D �D M O� C M n v ONI M r 00 M Vl D: N C'i o Q ovo voe oee ee ovo oao voe veo o'vo o" O•rte 00o OC �C i MMM O�,I M, 07 ...•SOC v� 0./ �OODO M M M 0�00C ..0 r v ry N O D D O O OO M C -r DY O OO O U OO+ 0,CD O, oo p Cq .:.N,.. ,-•,(y V10 7,^ N h N M M DCO �n N r C n..., NCO T N M h 00 V r to J N NH NSM NNC ... N 0000 OON1 N�tn+1 NSM N.�.M Q (a h vl �O 00'O-' « .00. y b � b d - N U O O G C C `� C M vi 00 �O 00 r Op••' 00 00�' ON 00 O W :-• m vOi y VOj.•� m h'G N iC h O O C N.--�O G v O C r O C � C 3 m y m v _ .H n^ y nt h_ y h Un°¢FUn°QE°zpa°QE�pa°< spa°QE�oa°dF�C)4:6< �a°dE��a�.dE��o°Q ' U U U U U U U U 16 C)r) Z 66 4+ N N idcu Z H U C/1 a a wok aNC) N Z w o Lz, ZZa vol ewe W h M N 00N 000N 0000 vm 'N In%D N b0 700 b bbq w W OR r .O rNvl O Dr NqM q00�D goob q w A d C.:C C G .0 C0C, C?dC 00 O oor N O� ....L!' r N�D 00 N O_N t�.M-�oqG t+Mr t\ Q'' U Q o eee oe eoe oee wee e e eee a'a a a O r1pq ooMgOBD�D ....p� rM rM y rM ^r . ^ �n Dir "".00oo In r 0000N rD�� rMO W O� 06 00 00 6%6 00 ^00 W �or4— n ^^ q ^ ^ �D oN O 00rn 00rvn 00 00 00 r •q.ryM .NDN �Nq �hR ol hR a h N N-n N N In N N J z O m z 0 OO �Z 00 W U p� �D y o. O Fx eo Non yM . c.¢o Fz�oaca¢o Fo �oap¢1"Fo U0�Z CAv QH h ZzhvW7=Fn yp owl=FZ pa¢ oz 0 �ZaQFoo°¢F ¢zw ¢ 0 U F UU F z� LO 17 '0 .. N A � cc � H E-4 a a Wow a N}C'n N W W U w Q ZZ W 00�Ob C �Oc 'Tio '7 . v,00�o v 001 b 0 0 0 0ao0coo�o Qoo�O ^ p 00 000 000 000 `Y O' F—i o 000 Doc 00 M^I GC ^ ^C Cl) a n of t� oc =io�c ;zm w n 3 -�^ p Q M h,, g - 0gZ e e e e e e e e e e o.ON o+ D\O, D\O�0` U O+Ol — 0^ 00 t h 00 r h 00 t--h o0 t, 00 r U) a ahC a V1C O,h of ID O"a T Vl \0h<f O�hr, Do Q a N N h N N V 1 N N h N N v 1 N N vol Q a N N Vl N N h N N W F Q O F- F- 0 .. OQ q p N¢ Q W S� Q 0 �ti au. <> FQ �❑Q uco WAp 0p� < �M 00 ° 5 a°i— 5 u— �O cmF�- op° o o o Q H 5 — Q ¢R QF aQF W�aQF ac,QF �ac°,Q[-° pn°QE° V'�0.Q rn U 18 o00N _ \p cn 00 N d 0 U co aN � N W W w zz10 Go -o 000 H J W R A � d H o a B F F 19 ITEM NUMBER: A-1 DATE: -12/14/04 1918 11 197A FATA DE CITY O SCA RO CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES Tuesday, November 9, 2004 7:00 P.M. REGULAR SESSION: 7:00 P.M. Mayor Luna called the meeting to order at 7:28 p.m. and Council Member Clay led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL: Present: Council Members Clay, O'Malley, Pacas, Scalise and Mayor Luna Absent: None Others Present: City`Clerk / Assistant to City Manager Marcia McClure Torgerson and Deputy City Clerk Grace Pucci Staff Present: City Manager Wade McKinney, Assistant City Manager Jim Lewis, Administrative Services Director Rachelle Rickard, Community Development Director Warren Frace, Public Works Director Steve Kahn, Community Services Director Brady Cherry, Police Chief John Couch, Deputy Public Works Director Geoff English, Redevelopment Specialist Marty Tracey and Interim City Attorney Tom Gibson. COMMUNITY FORUM: Eric Greening announced a meeting regarding the North County Transit Study at the Colony House on Monday at 5:00 p.m. Mr. Greening asked if tonight's meeting would be adjourned to the next meeting of the Parks and Recreation Committee. CC Draft Minutes 11/09/04 Page 1 of 5 20 City Manager Wade McKinney stated there would be a special joint meeting between the Parks and Recreation Commission and the Council when staff is prepared to make a presentation on the Youth Center. Kevin Campion expressed concern about the north bound off ramp of Highway 101 at Santa Barbara Road and the visibility problem at that the stop sign. Mayor Luna closed the Community Forum period. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Mayor Luna 'suggested completing the Council meeting then opening the Public Financing Authority meeting MOTION: By Council Member O'Malley and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Scalise to approve the agenda as revised. Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS: Mayor Luna announced that his office hours tomorrow would be changed to 3:00 to 5:00 p.m. Council Member O'Malley stated he would miss the December 14th -City Council meeting. He also asked staff for an update on gray water options. City Manager Wade McKinney indicated there would be a report to Council by the end of the week or early next week. Council Member O'Malley suggested looking at the city plan for bike and walkway areas at a Strategic Planning Session. There was'Council consensus to look at bike and walkway areas, consistent with the General Plan, at a-Strategic Planning Session. Council Member Clay spoke about recent rainfall and water usage. Mayor Pro Tem Scalise, in response to Mr. Greening's comments during the Community Forum, stated there are some issues with the Regional Transportation Plan regarding service to Atascadero. A. CONSENT CALENDAR: 1. City Council Meeting Minutes —October 12,2004 ■ City Clerk Recommendation: Council_approve the City Council meeting minutes of October 12, 2004., [City Clerk] CC Draft Minutes 19/09/04 Page 2 of 5 -21 2. September 2004 Treasurer's Report ■ Fiscal Impact: None ■ Recommendation: Council approve the City Treasurer's report for September 2004. [City Treasurer] 3. Final Map 2004-0094(Parcel.Map AT 03-0101) 2135 San Fernando Road (TPM 2004-0058) Phillips/Wilson Land Survey) Fiscallmpact: None. Recommendations: Council 1 Accept Final Parcel Map 2004-0094 (Parcel Map AT 03-0101); and, 2. Reject offer of dedication for streets without prejudice to future acceptance. [Public Works] 4. Final Map 2003-0063 (Tract 2495) 6025 Del Rio Road (TTM 2002- 0026) (Midland Pacific) Fiscal Impact: None. • Recommendations: Council: 1. Accept Final Parcel Map 2003-0063 (Tract 2495); and, 2. Reject, without prejudice to future acceptance, the offer of dedications for; a. Streets b. Public Pedestrian Access Easements. c. Public Landscape Easement. d. Public Utility Easement. e. Public Drainage Easement. f. Public Sewer Easement. g. Lots 71, 72 and 73; and, 3. Authorize City Manager to execute Subdivision Improvement Agreement; and, 4. Authorize City Manager to sign Workforce and Affordable Housing Selection Plan; and, 5. Authorize City Manager to sign Agreements to Provide Housing Units for Persons and Family of Low/Moderate income; and, 6. Authorize City Manager to sign Subdivision Annexation and Assessment and Parcel Tax Authorization Deferral Agreement. [Public Works] PUBLIC COMMENT— None MOTION: By Mayor Pro Tem Scalise and seconded by Council Member Clay to approve Items #A-1, 2, 3 and 4. Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. CC Draft Minutes 11/09/04 Page 3 of 5 22 B. PUBLIC HEARING: 1. Issuance of Redevelopment Bonds Fiscal Impact: None. Recommendations: Council: 1. Adopt the draft Resolution authorizing the execution of a joint exercise of powers agreement creating the Atascadero Public Financing Authority and; 2. Adopt the draft'Resolution approving the issuance and sale by the Atascadero Community Redevelopment Agency of tax allocation bonds to finance redevelopment activities within and for the benefit of the Agency's Atascadero Redevelopment Project. [Administrative Services] PUBLIC COMMENT None MOTION: By Council Member O'Malley and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Scalise to adopt the draft Resolution authorizing the execution of a joint exercise of powers agreement creating the Atascadero Public Financing Authority and; adopt the draft Resolution approving the issuance and sale by the Atascadero Community Redevelopment Agency of tax allocation bonds to finance redevelopment activities within and for the benefit of the Agency's Atascadero Redevelopment Project. Motion passed 5:0 by roll-call vote. C. COMMITTEE & LIAISON REPORTS: Mayor Luna 1. Integrated Waste Management Authority (IWMA): Meeting tomorrow, will be choosing a new base year as Paso Robles is now part of the IWMA. If 2003 is chosen as the base year the diversion rate will be 63% rather than 51% as it is at present. Mayor Pro Tem Scalise 1. S.L.O. Council of Governments (SLOCOG)/S.L.O. Regional Transit Authority_ (SLORTA): Met last week and are'still looking at what the dollar allocation will be for various projects, and Atascadero is fairing very well as far as their allocations. Council Member O'Malley 1. League of California Cities - Grassroots Network:Will be attending meeting in Carpentaria next Friday. Thanked Council and staff for their hard work in supporting Proposition 1A. CC Draft Minutes 11/09/04 Page 4of5 23 2. Economic Vitality Corporation, Board of Directors (EVC): Seeking a new Executive Director. D. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION: City Clerk City Clerk Marcia McClure Torgerson announced that several terms are up for renewal on both the. Parks and Recreation and Planning Commissions and asked those Council Members recently reelected to decide on their appointments. Regarding the at-large Commission members, City Clerk" Torgerson asked Council if they would like those Commissioners to stay on until after the Strategic Planning session in January. There was Council consensus to ask the at-large Commissioners to stay on until after the StrategicPlanning Session in January. E. ADJOURNMENT: Mayor Luna adjourned the meeting at 7:48 p.m. to the next regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council on November 23, 2005. - MEETING RECORDED AND MINUTES'PREPARED BY: Grace Pucci, Deputy City Clerk CC Draft Minutes 11/09/04 Page 5 of 5 24 ITEM NUMBER: A — 2 DATE: 12/14/04 '■ ■■ r ■ R M i 1918 ■ 1979 Atascadero City Council October 2004 Staff Report - City Treasurer October 2004 Investment Report RECOMMENDATION: Council approve the City Treasurer's report for October 2004 REPORT IN BRIEF: Cash and Investments' Checking $ 212,299 Money Market Accounts 2,371 Certificates of Deposit 6,631,327 Government Securities 4,070,721 LAI F 14,375,067 • Cash with Fiscal Agents 143,967 Cash in Banks at October 31, 2004 $ 25,435,752 Deposits in Transit - Outstanding Checks (220,542) Cash and Investments at October 31, 2004 $ 25,215,210 Investment Activity Securities Purchased: Purchase Date Description Type Cost Maturity Date 10/06/04 Heartland Bank&Trust CD $ 97,000 10/06/09 10/25/04 Fed'I Home Loan Mtg Corp- Gov't Security 337,297 01/22/08 10/27/04 Providian National Bank CD 98,000 10/29/07 Securities Matured: None Securities Sold/Called Prior to Maturity: Transaction / Original Cost/ Gain / (Loss) Tran Date Description /Type Maturity Call Price on Call Sold Heartland Bank&Trust $ 97,000 $ 97,333 $ 333 10/06/04 Certificate of Deposit 09/03/09 Other Reportable Activities: None Page 1 of 13 25 CITY OF ATASCADERO TREASURER'S REPORT CASH&INVESTMENTS ACTIVITY SUMMARY FOR THE MONTH OF OCTOBER 2004 CHECKING FISCAL ACCOUNT INVESTMENTS AGENT TOTALS Balance per Banks at October 1,2004 $ 134,419 $ 25,631,288 $ 143,842 $ 25,909,549 Receipts 1,008,480 67,901 125 1,076,506 Disbursements (1,550,303) (1,550,303) Transfers In 1,290,000 670,297 - 1,960,297 Transfers Out (670,297) (1,290,000) - (1,960,297) Balance per Banks at October 31,2004' $ 212,299 $ 25,079,486 $ 143,967 25,435,752 Deposits in Transit Outstanding Checks (220,5.42) Adjusted Treasurer's Balance $ 25,215,210 26 Page 2 of 13 h C) en rn o o o. o o o o o h ) �o O .D O O O O O O O O o M O o oo v o 0 0 0 0 0 0 C N h �O '-i 00 Vi vj h h Oi h r- r- h 01 m T O+ O 00 � O v e h O O O O C7 O O O O O O O O O O O. O O O M O O O V O O O O O O O O Vl N h r- O 00 Vl Vl h h h h h O, O Vl 00 O Vl Vl O v1 O Vl V'1 00 , O a1 ^ d' V 00 •--� '� Ct M M M M M � W 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 o o O O O Cl O In vl O V1 O D\ WOE,. N � eo tts ctt � of eo. ca m c0 ca td cd a1 O � 'v'i ' :t4y 4:4 • 44y :14 a Q) m a� w w w w w w w w w w w w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d v o d a� v > W ie iu N iC i0 id a is id id is r (Z U U U U U u v U U U U U W o o o o o o o o o o o o O OO �O N N M M OO O M O h h O O •--� .--i O O O O O O L cl d h It O m Ca WC' v � a xa o Z � � U ^o q � a � � a R � � 'o '' o Gz, U •� N � z •,L, a% v� � � o � � cn [-� C Ra o eCa r a ^o O � d > c -o .a Pa UA � a wQ tiw .. 0 Zz P, Cq wa At7 3AB y7 f�j c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 7 M C, N (� � � � O � O O N N •--� � M M_ O O Q o 0 Cl o O o 0 0 0 27 CD 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 [� O O o O o 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 C C C C C C o O o C 0 C C C O W O; vi of ON ON o; O; a: o r- o\ r) vi vi O\ O\ O1 C, Q` ( N C) a\ D1 0, ON O, V ti \.� cd td cd c0 c0 cd � N cd c0. fC a1 ni O ti ae o O o o O o 0 o O O c o 0 0 O Cl O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 UO, C, C, O, a, o o O, o O, O, O, rn rn �l O o o O, o v, o I v� vi o n a„ M O q o e o o o 0 0 0 o EW.i O O O v'i O I O t h V1 .¢ W O O a0 O O V M h O O M M 0 Al D � o WCti w I� O O O O O O O O O O O O ~ ami ami ami ami IL) a w w w w w w w w w w w w �. 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 vj d O ;; rou18 U U U w w w w~ w w w^ w w w w^ w ' > z > x U U U v L u v _ v v N N N N N N Ly O O OO O O O O O O O O O O O OM. C-4 N cq N OM N N Q n n r .-r r [� 00 O, 0000 00 00 O O O O O O O O O O O O O a Y m C a 6. �. E. ca09 0 ca m 00 �1 03 c d Q I0 b z .o v z o o ai pa �" e O W s� (� C1 i P-7 h d c •C o, v °' a� 0D C5u 9k CGa Oa Oa U .a w � .a0 w UU HO zV) H xm o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 N --� N_O N N n n ..r N M CO 00 00 00 O O Cl O O. O O O O O O 28 O O O O o o O o Wn o 0 0 o O [. o 0 0 0 0 o O O o o O o O o 0 0 o O o v a o lc� o C o O o O W o o r- a; W) �o r, C, kr) 00 ON t- r- C> 4\ C, N D\ D\ N Q, O, °, O, Ch Lol con c0 ctl cd c0 Rt O N c0 vl cd c0 e0 cd c0 4 e O O O O O O O O O O O O O Cl O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C C 0 0 w) o c o Oo C W Cl a, o, o o1 o rn o, o o, o rn rn rn C.1 N M M o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O OO O O O O O M Vl n O. O h O O h V'1 � [� O 00 DD �1 M O O O O O -O O l� O O O O O Q\ I� O DD o0 C fn IN M O � M W �Z , bb � o � a °a a °n. .� c. a � o. a o. °a, °p. � A A A A A w w w w w w w w w w w o o —0 0 0 0 Cd a U U U U U U U U U U U o 0 U U U U C7 U U 0 U U U V U O N N N N cr N p O O p O O OO OO O O O O OO 10 O v1 MM ,O n O O v1 N O O O N M M O O Q 00 00 O, O, O, n O O r- O O O O O O O a b a ° a h ° H Z. b�0 Cn 04 C p � W C7 W sem. °t R.OW) 94 , .a 000 w �" a N to- eQ. O C G E ed 00 m04 Z C per, z p� '� o s ``d' CID v] x caE x ca C o 00 wU v� U oti zU wZ wU w � mu wU a, H o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 v o v c oo a kr) cl� a, o o = tr) A o0 00 O, O, O O O O O O O O 29 C> O Wn o 0 0 0 o O o o a, o 0 [r O O N O O O O O O O O ,° O O C W o o v o r- 0 00 00 00 o Cl rn o rn o rn o o, o, o, V c0 ftl V1 cC SO R7 \t0 cd td cO Rf � p cd e O OO O O O O O O O O O -0 O O O O O O O O O O Cl O O O Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0000 0o O 'n n o 0 W rn o 0 o rn o ON ONo, n o, o v rq 6R Q o o o o 00 0 0 0 0 - e - o o e O O O O O O O 0 N v9 M M N M - M M M M N N N M N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O_ O V) O O O O O O O O. 44 -t4 o a Ur Z a a a a a n a. o WA A A A A A A AGO Cr D ° ° ° a ° CIO V)o 0 0 o [ w > > w w w o o w w o o w o 0 U U U 0 U C7 U U U 8 C7 U C7 C7 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O V � n N M Q, O ti •7 ,O � O O .�-i .N-i O - O O O O Cl O O O O O O- O O O U It c 1 Irl 0 4 c c Q wLn Y .d .a c > w Cr, w o w °, w a, cc .d '«?r" py L p p o Cd O w L L q w U U C7x wU as wU C7aU A � wU cd wU Ua° wU w oo o0 00 00 00 00 0o ao 00 W o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O ►� .--i N N O O Q, O O N O N Q •--� --� O O O Cl O O Cl O O O 30 C> 0 0 0 o O o o o 0 o O o (r o O o o o o o o o O o 0 0 O N O O O O O rn a, � O, DC, T O a\a,\ ON O, Q, C� D, A 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 Cl 0 Cl 0 Cl O o 0 0 O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 O; o, a o r- o O` O; o vi In r- j O, rn O, D1 Cl O D\ o, M o\ O1 O, U D1 C4 w q o o e o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o J ul o N M 00 lA M M M M 7 M M M M M M M w o o e o o o o e o o o e Ir vl O O O O .-+ O v1 O I IR p l p vi O M M In M M M It V M M M M M M M V1 h VlVl fA y N •y •y •VI N fA. O O O O O. O O O O U a a a a a n a a w w w w w w w w w w w w O O O O O [ O O [ O O O O O N NN N NN N -4 0 .eNd Nd N id cd U U U U U U U U U U U U ti t t: C t > t: t > t C t C N N N N N O N NO N N - N N N U U U U U C7 U U C7 U U U U U "TTVVII O �O O O O O O V00 00 �O O O O O O O In 00 N l0 M �' ,D I l O O •-• N .NN \ \ N N \ �Mr O O A O O O O O O O O O O O cw o U W F _ U � 0, c V icc 0.1cc Cd Sv x a F aii p aLi d ��d d o o C o L C L N t° O. = n. O S, o > 'y r� d E G d rte- o ctl o _ L o F Q A -- v7 U a V1 � W U U U d O W U W x W u � U w a w a 00 OoDO 00 00 0, M O, 00 O, O, O, o, O, +� 6v o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Vrl 00 [- N ,D l� d' N O, O O - '7 OO O 7' N N OO N N Q Q OO O q 00 00 ry O O O --� O O O O O O O O O 31 0 o O o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (r o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C. 0 0 o O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O W t� vi h oo In o r- of r- r, t� n rn rn rn rn o rn o O, o, a, O, O; rn rn U ; • ti v� _e O O O O O O O O O O O O Cl O O O O O O O O O Cl O - O O O O C 0 0 0 0 Vo rn a o rn O, o rn rn o rn o o rn uv Q 0 0 0 0 0 �.1 v) o o v-, W') C o W) o 0 0 M M o o o 0 0 0 0 0 o o o W o o o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 vt Vl Vl O : vl O C O - V1 O V'1 O O O O O, 0 A � o WC7 O •fn •N •y .N y N � �N N h N N N h Ear -G O. G O - O O O O O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 � o 0 0 o O o 0 N iNo .0+ iNs N ca y N1 .O. is is ca N - N U U U U U U 0 U U U U U U U v � � v er v d• c � v � v v rn o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O M O O N O a A N M M M V1 [�. O, O, 0\ a, O O O Cl O O O O Cl O O O O Cl C_ o o > a � oar = Q oev `° cm > q ee u CO G ` F u y C v H d i n. v, u v7 d u o p,0 19 3 v u .0 3 .x c F y o 5 �: 0.l W U Ar cn � Z d' W U V] W O, O, U O, O1 O, O, O, O, 01 O, O1 0, a, Er 7 v O N h O ,O M O O N O Q N M M M vki f) W) ,O ,O r O\, a ON O, O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 32 Z S v rn rn tn r- CIN rn U O O cV aA � o ti Cd • U ' W O w rn rn as U es finO +.. d G Q In C\ Un.. . ti O� 0. y CCS In ate, fy 3 y °O n n 3 fl h M x a WOer Z w e c UA � o N a o Qn b of 04 'a _N .y F w O "Coll p. U N U 2 0 Ww l ° a U U 18U •c Y Al ,c w e U O �U A 'v t°u d �- a w e R 3 0 0 °o fy Z G F o } 4)oyn C X01 •�'�' `�° � C, r Q c C ra H cd u U b d L �. U •� w ¢ 33 City of Atascadero Investments by Type October 2004 Government Securities 16% Cash with Certificates of Deposit Fiscal Agent 26% 1% Other 0% LAIF 57% Investment October 2004 LAIF $ 14,375,067 Certificates of Deposit 6,631,327 Government Securities 4,070,721 Cash with Fiscal Agent 143,967 Other 2,371 $ 25,223,453 34 Page 10 of 13 City of Atascadero Investments by Maturity October 2004 One Month One to Five Years to One Year 39% Within 3% One Month 0% t , On Demand 58% Investment October 2004 On Demand $ 14,377,438 Within One Month 97,000 One Month to One Year 796,333 One to Five Years 9,808,715 $ 25,079,486 Page 11 of 13 35 City of Atascadero Investments by Custodial Agent October 2004 RBC Dain Rauscher 30% Bank of New York Penson 1% City of Financial Corp. Atascadero 13% 0% State of California 56% Custodial Agent October 2004 State of California $ 14,375,067 Penson Financial Corp. 3,187,367 RBC Dain Rauscher 7,468,591 Bank of New York 143,967 City of Atascadero 48,461 $ 25,223,453 36 Page 12 of 13 City of Ataseadero Investment Yield vs. 2-Year Treasury Yield For the Year Ended October 31,2004 3.00% 2.50% 2.00% 1.50% 1.00% 0.50% 3 0.00% 00 00 00 Off` Off` O� OtK Off` Off` rP fry0 �O rti0 �O �O rL0 rp ry0 r�0 rL0 ,y0 O°`owe` 1 �0 city Yield 2-Yr Treasury Yield 2-Yr Treasury City Yield Yield October 2003 2.21% 1.75% November 2003 2.18% 1.93% December 2003 2.11% 1.91% January 2004 2.10% 1.76% February 2004 2.03% 1.74% March 2004 2.07% 1.58% April 2004 1.98% 2.07% May 2004 1.97% 2.53% June 2004 2.03% 2.76% July 2004 2.13% 2.64% August 2004 2.17% 2.51% September 2004 2.21% 2.53% October 2004 2.29% 2.58% Page 13 of 13 37 ITEM NUMBER: A - 3 DATE: 12/14/04 es o t CADS Atascadero City Council Staff Report - Administrative Services Department October 2004 Accounts Payable and Payroll RECOMMENDATION: Council approve certified City accounts payable, payroll and payroll vendor checks for October 2004. DISCUSSION: Attached for City Council review and approval are the following: Payroll Dated 10/07/04 Checks# 20060 - 20140 $ 72,671.47 Direct Deposits 135,097.61 Dated 10/21/04 Checks # 20141 20216 78,263.68 Direct Deposits 138,344.72 Accounts Payable Dated 10/1/04 10/31/04 Checks # 96894 - 97434 & EFTs 311 - 317 1,286,868.65 TOTAL AMOUNT $ 1,71-1,246.13 FISCAL IMPACT: Total expenditures for all funds is $ 1,711,246.13 CERTIFICATION: The undersigned certifies that the attached demands have been released for payment and that funds are available for these demands. Raclielle Rickard, Director of Administrative Services Approved by the City Council at a meeting held December 14, 2004. ATTACHMENT: Marcia McClure Torgerson, C.M.C., City Clerk October 2004 Eden Warrant Register in the amount of $ 1,286,868.65 38 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listine For the Month of October 2004 Check Check Number Date Vendor Description Amount 96894 10/1/2004 AARDVARK TACTICAL,INC Accounts Payable Check 212.49 96895 10/1/2004 ACTION FAX&PRINTER Accounts Payable Check 60.00 96896 10/1/2004 ADAMSON POLICE PRODUCTS Accounts Payable Check 461.81 96897 10/1/2004 ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE BUR Accounts Payable Check 30.00 96898 10/1/2004 BARBARAALWARD`. Accounts Payable Check 17.50 96899 10/1/2004 AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSC Accounts Payable Check 196.00 96900 10/1/2004 AMERICAN SANITATION Accounts Payable Check 68.64 96901 10/1/2004 AMERICAN WEST TIRE&AUTO INC Accounts Payable Check 168.96 96902 10/1/2004 DAVID ANASTASIA Accounts Payable Check 107.23 96903 10/1/2004 AQUA TEK POWERWASH&STEAM Accounts Payable Check 200.00 96904 10/1/2004 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 223.96 96905 10/1/2004 ARCH Accounts Payable Check 970.11 96906 10/1/2004 GINA ARIAS Accounts Payable Check` 7.50 96907 10/1/2004 AT&T WIRELESS Accounts Payable Check 45.75 96908 10/1/2004 ATASCADERO FORD Accounts Payable Check 818.74 96909 10/1/2004 ATASCADERO MAIN STREET Accounts Payable Check 14,500.00 96910 10/1/2004 ATASCADERO MUTUAL WATER CO. Accounts Payable Check 70.8 96911 10/1/2004 ATASCADERO NEWS Accounts Payable Check 3,443.89 96912 10/1/2004 ATASCADERO SAW SHOP Accounts Payable Check 84.00 96913 10/1/2004 ATASCADERO TEMPLE ASSOCIATION Accounts Payable Check 455.00 96914 10/1/2004 BAIBA'S SAFETY SERVICE,INC. Accounts,Payable Check 650.00 96915 10/1/2004 BASIC CHEMICAL SOLUTIONS,LLC Accounts Payable Check, 3,045.86 96916 10/1/2004 BATTERY SYSTEMS Accounts Payable Check 48.21 96917 10/1/2004 BEST BEST&KRIEGER LLP Accounts Payable Check 16,458.30 96918 10/1/2004 BEST WESTERN COLONY INN Accounts Payable Check 587.05 96919 10/1/2004 LORI BRICKEY Accounts Payable Check 14.25 96920 10/1/2004 BUILDING PERMITS LAW BULLETIN Accounts Payable Check 88.78 96921 10/1/2004 BURTON'S FIRE APPARATUS Accounts Payable Check 46.27 96922 10/1/2004 BUTLER BUSINESS MACHINES Accounts Payable Check 150.00 96923 10/1/2004 CALIFORNIA CODE CHECK Accounts Payable Check 7,956.90 96924 10/1/2004 CALIFORNIA CONSERVATION CORP Accounts Payable Check 1,200.00 96925 10/1/2004 JASON F.CARR Accounts Payable Check 303.78 96926 10/1/2004 JOSEPH M.CARRO Accounts Payable Check 665.00 96927 10/1/2004 CENTRAL COAST PLAYGROUNDS Accounts Payable Check 2,990.0 96928 10/1/2004 BRADY CHERRY Accounts Payable Check 378. 39 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listins For the Month of October 2004 Check Check 4I V96929 ber Date Vendor Description Amount 10/1/2004 CHEVRON 2 326.77 Accounts Payable Check.- , 96930 10/1/2004 CHICAGO GRADE LANDFILL Accounts Payable Check 858.60 96931 10/1/2004 JOSEPH CHOUINARD P.E. Accounts Payable Check 4,400.00 96932 10/1/2004 CJP PRODUCTIONS Accounts Payable Check 561.00 96933 10/1/2004 JERRY L.CLAY Accounts Payable Check 75.00 96934 10/1/2004 CLEAN WATER SYSTEMS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 35.00 96935 10/1/2004 COASTAL IMAGING SUPPLIES Accounts Payable Check 170.53 96936 10/1/2004 CONSOLIDATED PLASTICS COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 185.69 96937 10/1/2004 CUESTA EQUIPMENT Accounts Payable Check 82.50 96938 10/1/2004 DAN BIDDLE PEST CONTROL SERVIC Accounts Payable Check 80.00 96939 10/1/2004 DARRYL'S LOCK AND SAFE Accounts Payable Check 51.91 96940 10/1/2004 DECOU LUMBER COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 589.08 96941 10/1/2004 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Accounts Payable Check 616.55 96942 10/1/2004 DIRECT SHRED AccountsPayable Check 44.40 96943 10/1/2004 DOOLEY ENTERPRISES INC Accounts Payable Check 2,488.20 96944 10/1/2004 ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY COMMISSIO Accounts Payable Check 6,280.42 96945 10/1/2004 EDEN SYSTEMS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 875.00 96946 10/1/2004 EL CAMINO CAR WASH LLC Accounts Payable Check 58.05 96947 10/1/2004 EWING Accounts Payable Check 308.96 96948 10/1/2004 EXXON MOBIL Accounts Payable Check 901.55 96949 10/1/2004 FAMILY MEDICAL GROUP OF PASO Accounts Payable Check 230.00 96950 10/1/2004 JENNIFER FANNING Accounts Payable Check 95.24 96951 10/1/2004 FEDERAL EXPRESS Accounts Payable Check 363.76 96952 10/1/2004 FERRELL'S AUTO REPAIR Accounts Payable Check 617.11 96953 10/1/2004 FIRST AM REAL ESTATE SOLUTIONS Accounts Payable Check 100.00 96954 10/1/2004 WARREN FRACE Accounts Payable Check 300.00 96955 10/1/2004 FRANK'S CUSTOM UPHOLSTERY Accounts Payable Check 176.71 96956 10/1/2004 FRAZEE INDUSTRIES,INC. Accounts Payable Check 105.25 96957 10/1/2004 FRUIN COMMUNICATIONS Accounts Payable Check 4,250.00 96958 10/1/2004 GAS COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 393.36 96959 10/1/2004 GEM AUTO PARTS Accounts Payable Check 193.04 96960 10/1/2004 GIBBS SECURITY GATES Accounts Payable Check 288.00 96961 10/1/2004 MIKE GIL Accounts Payable Check 494.00 96962 10/1/2004 GREENAWAY CONSTRUCTION Accounts Payable Check 1,584.00 96963 10/1/2004 GRISANTI HARDWARE Accounts Payable Check 15.26 96964 10/1/2004 HART IMPRESSIONS PRINT&COPY Accounts Payable Check 804.66 40 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listine For the Month of October 2004 Check Check Number Date Vendor Description Amount 96965 10/1/2004 HARVEY'S HONEYHUTS Accounts Payable Check 59.50 96966 10/1/2004 MEREDITH HENDRICKSON Accounts Payable Check 120.00 96967 10/1/2004 HINDERLITER,DE LLAMAS Accounts Payable Check 1,039.52 96968 10/1/2004 HOBBY SHOP Accounts Payable Check 227.63 96969 10/1/2004 HOME DEPOT Accounts Payable Check 1,593.78 96970 10/1/2004 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Accounts Payable Check 553.60 96971 10/1/2004 INGLIS PET HOTEL Accounts Payable Check 447.04 96972 10/1/2004 EVELYN INGRAM Accounts Payable Check 544.60 96973 10/1/2004 J&S SWEEPING SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 1,760.00 96974 10/1/2004 JESPERSEN'S TIRE SERVICE,INC. Accounts Payable Check 20.00 96975 10/1/2004 JIFFY LUBE 41932 PCJL,INC. Accounts Payable Check 122.33 96976 10/1/2004 JOHN L.WALLACE&ASSOCIATES Accounts Payable Check 4,043.75 96977 10/1/2004 K-MART Accounts Payable Check 21.44 96978 10/1/2004 STEVEN KAHN Accounts Payable Check 300.00 96979 10/1/2004 KIM LACEY Accounts Payable Check 27.78 96980 10/1/2004 LAIDLAW TRANSIT SERVICES,INC. Accounts Payable Check 16,366.06 96981 10/1/2004 DAN LASHLEY Accounts Payable Check 22.00 96982 10/1/2004 LEE WILSON ELECTRIC CO.INC Accounts Payable Check 14,623.31 96983 10/1/2004 LEMOS FEED&PET SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 36.01 96984 10/1/2004 JIM LEWIS Accounts Payable Check 120.00 96985 10/1/2004 LIFE ASSIST,INC. Accounts Payable Check 441.61 96986 10/1/2004 DAVID J.LODEN Accounts Payable Check 90.00 96987 10/1/2004 LONGS DRUG STORES Accounts Payable Check 23.29 96988 10/1/2004 GEORGE W.LUNA Accounts Payable Check 75.00 96989 10/1/2004 LYNDON'S AUTOMOTIVE Accounts Payable Check 37.50 96990 10/1/2004 ANNETTE MANIER Accounts Payable Check 95.00 96991 10/1/2004 KERRY MARGASON Accounts Payable Check 19.88 96992 10/1/2004 MATHIS&ASSOCIATES Accounts Payable Check 3,000.00 96993 10/1/2004 WADE MCKINNEY Accounts Payable Check 798.50 96994 10/1/2004 MEDWORKS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 415.00 96995 10/1/2004 MID-COAST GEOTECHNICAL,INC. Accounts Payable Check 795.00 96996 10/1/2004 MID-COAST MOWER&SAW Accounts Payable Check 8.56 96997 10/1/2004 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE Accounts Payable Check 98.63 96998 10/1/2004 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 80.31 96999 10/1/2004 MORRO GROUP,INC. Accounts Payable Check 10,553.710 41 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of October 2004 Check Check umber Date Vendor Description Amount 97000 10/1/2004 MOST DEPENDABLE FOUNTAINS Accounts Payable Check 181.00 97001 10/1/2004 MPI MICROFILM SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 2,156.22 97002 10/1/2004 DAVID MUEHLHAUSEN Accounts Payable Check 24.66 _ 97003 10/1/2004 NATIONAL STAFFING LLC Accounts Payable Check 1,753.80 97004 10/1/2004 NEW EDGE NETWORKS TRANSEDGE Accounts Payable Check 564.26 97005 10/1/2004 NORTH COUNTY WOMENS SHELTER Accounts Payable Check 3,400.00 97006 10/1/2004 NORTHERN ENERGY Accounts Payable Check 70.00 97007 10/1/2004 THOMAS P.O'MALLEY Accounts Payable Check 175.00 97008 10/1/2004 OFFICE DEPOT INC. Accounts Payable Check 400.19 97009 10/1/2004 OMNI-MEANS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 1,036.50 97010 10/1/2004 OUTLET TOOL SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 59.78 97011 10/1/2004 BECKY J.PACAS Accounts Payable Check 75.00 97012 10/1/2004 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC Accounts Payable Check 3,055.20 97013 10/1/2004 PADRE ASSOCIATES,INC. Accounts Payable Check 5,697.60 97014 10/1/2004 PAPER WORKS Accounts PayableCheck113.35 97015 10/1/2004 PASO ROBLES SAFE&LOCK Accounts Payable Check 176.89 97016 10/1/2004 KATHLEEN A.PENCE Accounts Payable Check 7,117.50 97017 10/1/2004 FINANCE DEPARTMENT PETTY CASH Accounts Payable Check 407.51 97018 10/1/2004 PRINT LOGIC,INC. Accounts Payable Check 70.00 97019 10/1/2004 PSC INDUSTRIAL OUTSCOURCING IN Accounts Payable Check 1,180.00 97020 10/1/2004 PUBLIC SAFETY CENTER,INC. Accounts Payable Check 233.58 97021 10/1/2004 GRACE L.PUCCI Accounts Payable Check 442.50 97022 10/1/2004 QUILL CORPORATION Accounts Payable Check 1,289.46 97023 10/1/2004 RECALL SECURE DESTRUCTION SERV Accounts Payable Check 60.53 97024 10/1/2004 RECOGNITION WORKS Accounts Payable Check 6.44 97025 10/1/2004 RACHELLE RICKARD Accounts Payable Check 300.00 97026 10/1/2004 STEVE ROMO Accounts Payable Check 136.00 97027 10/1/2004 RRM DESIGN GROUP Accounts Payable Check 253.00 97028 10/1/2004 S.D.FRANKLIN ELECTRIC,INC. Accounts Payable Check 364.50 97029 10/1/2004 SAFETY-KLEEN INC. Accounts Payable Check 189.90 97030 10/1/2004 SAN LUIS OBISPO CO LABORATORY Accounts Payable Check 279.00 97031 10/1/2004 SANTA LUCIA SPORTSMEN ASSOCIAT Accounts Payable Check 268.80 97032 10/1/2004 SANTA MARIA TIRE,INC. Accounts Payable Check 135.06 97033 10/1/2004 SBC Accounts Payable Check 1,252.65 97034 10/1/2004 SBC/MCI Accounts Payable Check 396.67 97035 10/1/2004 WENDY SCALISE Accounts Payable Check 75.00 42 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listine For the Month of October 2004 Check Check Number Date Vendor Description Amount 97036 10/1/2004 SCOVELL TREE SURGERY Accounts Payable Check— 4,925.00 97037 10/1/2004 JOHN SIEMENS Accounts Payable Check 201.70 97038 10/1/2004 SIGN OUTLET Accounts Payable Check 192.50 97039 10/1/2004 SHANNON SIMS Accounts Payable Check 13.48 97040 10/1/2004 SKIP'S CUSTOM AUTO UPHOLSTERY Accounts Payable Check 325.00 97041 10/1/2004 SLOCAPRA Accounts Payable Check 20.00 97042 10/1/2004 DAVID L.SMAW Accounts Payable Check 102.00 97043 10/1/2004 STAPLES CREDIT PLAN Accounts Payable Check 1,107.94 97044 10/1/2004 SYLVESTER'S SECURITY ALARMS Accounts Payable Check 285.00 97045 10/1/2004 TARVIN&ASSOCIATES Accounts Payable Check 1,140.00 97046 10/1/2004 TEMPLETON UNIFORMS Accounts Payable Check 943.79 97047 10/1/2004 ALEX TERRAZAS Accounts Payable Check 300.00 97048 10/1/2004 TESORO CAR WASH Accounts Payable Check 171.00 97049 10/1/2004 KIMBERLEY TOLER Accounts Payable Check 275.00 97050 10/1/2004 TOP SHOP UPHOLSTERY Accounts Payable Check 152.44 97051 10/1/2004 DARKEN TUCKER Accounts Payable Check 356.25 97052 10/1/2004 TURF EQUIPMENT SVC&REPAIRS Accounts Payable Check 200.0 97053 10/1/2004 TURF STAR,INC. Accounts Payable Check 111.2 97054 10/1/2004 ULTREX BUSINESS PRODUCTS Accounts Payable Check 319.68 97055 10/1/2004 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT Accounts Payable Check 418.20 97056 10/1/2004 UPS Accounts Payable Check 27.25 97057 10/1/2004 VALLEY PACIFIC PETROLEUM SVCS Accounts Payable Check 2,802.38 97058 10/1/2004 IWINA VAN BEEK Accounts Payable Check 34.00 97059 10/1/2004 TOM VELASQUEZ Accounts Payable Check 51.00 97060 10/1/2004 BART VENDERLIP Accounts Payable Check 45.00 97061 10/1/2004 VERIZON WIRELESS Accounts Payable Check 542.24 97062 10/1/2004 BRIAN WEITKUM Accounts Payable Check 358.34 97063 10/1/2004 WESTERN FARM SERVICE,INC. Accounts Payable Check . 818.84 97064 10/1/2004 JANELLE WHALEY Accounts Payable Check 13.20 97065 10/1/2004 WILLIAM P.WHITE Accounts Payable Check 120.00 97066 10/1/2004 WULFING'S BACKGROUND&POLYGR Accounts Payable Check 925.00 97068 10/1/2004 BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA Payroll Vendor Payment 75,697.71 97070 10/1/2004 BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA Payroll Vendor Payment 1,606.85 97071 10/1/2004 COLONIAL LIFE&ACCIDENT INS. Payroll Vendor Payment 1,210.05 97072 10/1/2004 DELTA DENTAL,ATTN:ACCOUNTING Payroll Vendor Payment 7,686. 43 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listin2 For the Month of October 2004 Check Check umber Date Vendor Description Amount 97073 10/1/2004 THE STANDARD UNIT 22 Payroll Vendor Payment 905.10 317 10/4/2004 MID-STATE BANK Accounts Payable Check 209.79 316 10/7/2004 CUESTA TITLE,COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 300,000.00 97074 10/7/2004 ROCHELLE 0.HANSON Accounts Payable Check 179.72 97075 10/8/2004 ATASCADERO FIRE DEPT EMP.ASSN Payroll Vendor Payment 320.00 97076 10/8/2004 ATASCADERO FIRE RESERVES ASSN Payroll Vendor Payment 55.00 97077 10/8/2004 ATASCADERO MID MGRS ORG UNION Payroll Vendor Payment 20.00 97078 10/8/2004 ATASCADERO POLICE OFFICERS ASN Payroll Vendor Payment 388.16 97079 10/8/2004 FAMILY SUPPORT DIVISION Payroll Vendor Payment 207.69 97080 10/8/2004 EMPLOYMENT DEV DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 7,513.17 97081 10/8/2004 EMPLOYMENT DEV.DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 1,104.27 97082 10/8/2004 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE Payroll Vendor Payment 7,245.00 97083 10/8/2004 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 Payroll Vendor payment 300.00 97084 10/8/2004 KENNEDY CLUB FITNESS Payroll Vendor Payment 110.00 97085 10/8/2004 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION Payroll Vendor Payment 864.94 97086 10/8/2004 PERS LONG TERM CARE PROGRAM payroll Vendor Payment 16.19 97087 10/8/2004 PUBLIC EMPL RETIREMENT SYSTEM Payroll Vendor Payment 52,782.50 97088 10/8/2004 SAVE OUR SERVICES FUND Payroll Vendor Payment 25.00 97089 10/8/2004 SEIU LOCAL 620 AFL-CIO Payroll Vendor Payment 657.99 97090 10/8/2004 SLO CREDIT UNION Payroll Vendor Payment 500.00 97091 10/8/2004 UNITED WAY OF SLO COUNTY Payroll Vendor Payment 28.00 311 10/12/2004 MID-STATE BANK Payroll Vendor Payment 33,608.95 97092 10/15/2004 ALL ABOUT PRODUCE,CORP. Accounts Payable Check 1,048.69 97093 10/15/2004 DAVID ANASTASIA Accounts Payable Check 13.13 97094 10/15/2004 ANTECH DIAGNOSTICS Accounts Payable Check 960.75 97095 10/15/2004 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 301.09 97096 10/15/2004 ASAP REPROGRAPHICS Accounts Payable Check 375.38 97097 10/15/2004 AT&T Accounts Payable Check 48.05 97098 10/15/2004 AT&T WIRELESS Accounts Payable Check 45.75 97099 10/15/2004 ATASCADERO FORD Accounts Payable Check 510.84 97101 10/15/2004 ATASCADERO MUTUAL WATER CO. Accounts Payable Check 13,936.35 97102 10/15/2004 ATASCADERO NEWS Accounts Payable Check 31.50 . 97103 10/15/2004 ATASCADERO UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST Accounts Payable Check 149.96 44 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of October 2004 Check Check Number Date Vendor Description Amount 97104 10/15/2004 BASSETT'S CRICKET RANCH,INC. Accounts Payable Check 101.13 97105 10/15/2004 BATTERY SYSTEMS Accounts Payable Check 253.35 97106 10/15/2004 BENGAL ENGINEERING,LP Accounts Payable Check 4,000.00 97107 10/15/2004 CINDY K.BENSON Accounts Payable Check 567.00 97108 10/15/2004 BEST BEST&KRIEGER LLP Accounts Payable Check 24,874.99 97109 10/15/2004 BEST SELF STORAGE Accounts Payable Check 391.50 97110 10/15/2004 BOB'S CRANE SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 500.00 97111 10/15/2004 BORDEN PRECISION PRODUCTS,INC Accounts Payable Check 200.00 97112 10/15/2004 BRENDLER JANITORIAL SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 1,110.00 97113 10/15/2004 CAL-COAST REFRIGERATION,INC Accounts Payable Check 1,048.96 97114 10/15/2004 CALIF STATE FIRE MARSHAL Accounts Payable Check 30.00 97115 10/15/2004 CALIFORNIA CODE CHECK Accounts Payable Check 5,380.53 97116 10/15/2004 CANNON ASSOCIATES Accounts Payable Check 20,164.47 97117 10/15/2004 CARMEN CASTANEDA Accounts Payable Check 30.00 97118 10/15/2004 CDPC Accounts Payable Check 14.15 97119 10/15/2004 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL CED Accounts Payable Check 127.32 97120 10/15/2004 CELLULAR ONE Accounts Payable Check 1,262.66 97121 10/15/2004 CENTRAL COAST STRIPING Accounts Payable Check 490.00 97122 10/15/2004 CHEM CLEAN Accounts Payable Check 547.73 97123 10/15/2004 CHEM-DRY OF NORTH COUNTY Accounts Payable Check 457.00 97124 10/15/2004 CHICAGO GRADE LANDFILL Accounts Payable Check 160.00 97125 10/15/2004 JOSEPH CHOUINARD P.E. Accounts Payable Check 2,475.00 97126 10/15/2004 COASTAL IMAGING SUPPLIES Accounts Payable Check 341.06 97127 10/15/2004 CONWAY DISTRIBUTORS Accounts Payable Check '63.20 97128 10/15/2004 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER Accounts Payable Check 231.25 97129 10/15/2004 CTM GROUP,INC. Accounts Payable Check 559.30 97130 10/15/2004 DAN DAVIS Accounts Payable Check 388.50 97131 10/15/2004 SANDRA N.DEAL PH.D. Accounts Payable Check 290.00 97132 10/15/2004 DECOU LUMBER COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 55.10 97133 10/15/2004 CHERYL DEJONG Accounts Payable Check 16.13 97134 10/15/2004 DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY&FIRE Accounts Payable Check 30.00 97135 10/15/2004 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Accounts Payable Check 3,066.00 97136 10/15/2004 DIRECT SHRED Accounts Payable Check 62.40 97137 10/15/2004 HUGH DUGAN Accounts Payable Check 220.00 97138 10/15/2004 ED'S FLY MEAT,INC. Accounts Payable Check 42.0 97139 10/15/2004 EL CAMINO ASSOCIATES Accounts Payable Check 5,973.00 45 City of Atascadero Disbursement ListintJ For the Month of October 2004 Check Check Wumber Date Vendor Description Amount 97140 10/15/2004 EL CAMINO BUILDING SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 45.05 97141 10/15/2004 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES,INC. Accounts Payable Check 146.82 97142 10/15/2004 FERRELL'S AUTO REPAIR Accounts Payable Check 334.80 97143 10/15/2004 FGL ENVIRONMENTAL Accounts Payable Check 795.00 97144 10/15/2004 FOOD FOR LESS Accounts Payable Check 193.69 97145 10/15/2004 THOMAS FRAZIER Accounts Payable Check 12,708.87 97146 10/15/2004 GAS COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 11.55 97147 10/15/2004 KELLY GEARHART Accounts Payable Check 6,524.79 97148 10/15/2004 GEM AUTO PARTS Accounts Payable Check 158.51 97149 10/15/2004 MIKE GIL Accounts Payable Check 102.00 97150 10/15/2004 KENNETH GLYNN Accounts Payable Check 396.90 97151 10/15/2004 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION,INC. Accounts Payable Check 42,711.50 97152 10/15/2004 GRISANTI HARDWARE Accounts Payable Check 51.78 97153 10/15/2004 H.D.PETERSON Accounts Payable Check 47.07 97154 10/15/2004 JOHN HAND Accounts Payable Check 258.70 97155 10/15/2004 HART IMPRESSIONS PRINT&COPY Accounts Payable Check 363.12 97156 10/15/2004 GARY HIX Accounts Payable Check 40.00 97157 10/15/2004 HOME DEPOT Accounts Payable Check 1,107.02 97158 10/15/2004 DAVID HOOBLER Accounts Payable Check 52.00 97159 10/15/2004 INDUSTRIAL TRUCK BODIES Accounts Payable Check 2,383.44 97160 10/15/2004 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Accounts Payable Check 645.48 97161 10/15/2004 JB DEWAR INC Accounts Payable Check 77.02 97162 10/15/2004 KDS ADVISORS LLC Accounts Payable Check 5,000.00 97163 10/15/2004 ERNEST KESTONE Accounts Payable Check 30.00 97164 10/15/2004 LAIDLAW TRANSIT SERVICES,INC. Accounts Payable Check 16,083.32 97165 10/15/2004 LAW OFFICE OF STEPHEN BECKER Accounts Payable Check 2,196.48 97166 10/15/2004 JIM LEWIS Accounts Payable Check 309.26 97167 10/15/2004 DAVID J.LODEN Accounts Payable Check 90.00 97168 10/15/2004 MARK'S PLUMBING&WATER TRMNT Accounts Payable Check 315.00 97169 10/15/2004 MARK MARKWORT Accounts Payable Check 49.73 97170 10/15/2004 BECKY MAXWELL Accounts Payable Check 53.03 97171 10/15/2004 WADE MCKINNEY Accounts Payable Check 60.00 97172 10/15/2004 MEDWORKS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 115.00 97173 10/15/2004 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE Accounts Payable Check 348.57 97174 10/15/2004 MORRO GROUP,INC. Accounts Payable Check 1,116.00 46 City of Ataseadero Disbursement Listinc For the Month of October 2004 Check Check Number Date Vendor Description Amount 97175 10/15/2004 MPI MICROFILM SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 14.11 97176 10/15/2004 DAVE MUEHLHAUSEN Accounts Payable Check 100.00 97177 10/15/2004 NATIONAL DIAMOND Accounts Payable Check 259.56 97178 10/15/2004 NATIONAL STAFFING LLC Accounts Payable Check 1,011.20 97179 10/15/2004 MARGARET NAVARRO Accounts Payable Check 175.00 97180 10/15/2004 NORTH COUNTY BACKFLOW SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 205.74 97181 10/15/2004 NORTH COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY Accounts Payable Check 250.00 97182 10/15/2004 OFFICE DEPOT INC. Accounts Payable Check 214.42 97183 10/15/2004 OUTLET TOOL SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 122.79 97184 10/15/2004 PACIFIC AUTO GLASS Accounts Payable Check 38190 97186 10/15/2004 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC Accounts Payable Check 20,987.51 97187 10/15/2004 PADRE ASSOCIATES,INC. Accounts Payable Check 1,506.65 97188 10/15/2004 PASO ROBLES ELECTRIC,INC. Accounts Payable Check 489.53 97189 10/15/2004 PERRY'S PARCEL SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 31.18 97190 10/15/2004 FIRE DEPARTMENT PETTY CASH Accounts Payable Check 112.58 97191 10/15/2004 PITNEY BOWES,INC. Accounts Payable Check 137.28 97192 10/15/2004 PLAN TAG Accounts Payable Check 55.45 97193 10/15/2004 NICOLE POUCEL Accounts Payable Check 30.06 97194 10/15/2004 PROCARE JANITORIAL SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 287.90 97195 10/15/2004 PRODUCERS DAIRY FOODS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 28.00 97196 10/15/2004 LARRY PROEBER Accounts Payable Check 45.00 97197 10/15/2004 GRACE L.PUCCI Accounts Payable Check 270.00 97198 10/15/2004 PURKISS ROSE-RSI Accounts Payable Check 8,812.69 97199 10/15/2004 R.BURKE CORPORATION Accounts Payable Check 2,872.80 97200 10/15/2004 RAVATT,ALBRECHT,&ASSC. Accounts Payable Check 4,950.00 97201 10/15/2004 RECOGNITION WORKS Accounts Payable Check 4.56 97202 10/15/2004 MARK E.RIDER Accounts Payable Check 2,400.00 97203 10/15/2004 STEVE ROMO Accounts Payable Check 102.00 97204 10/15/2004 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY SHERIFF Accounts Payable Check 24,012.45 97205 10/15/2004 SANSOME COMPANY,INC. Accounts Payable Check 38,406.37 97206 10/15/2004 SANTA MARIA TIRE,INC. Accounts Payable Check 989.77 97207 10/15/2004 SANTA MARIA TOOL,INC. Accounts Payable Check 1,323.67 97208 10/15/2004 SBC Accounts Payable Check 100.40 97209 10/15/2004 SBC/MCI Accounts Payable Check 444.95 97210 10/15/2004 LISETTE SCHOLL Accounts Payable Check 171.50 97211 10/15/2004 RICHARD J. SHANNON Accounts Payable Check 615.00 47 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listine For the Month of October 2004 CheckCheck 4umber Date Vendor Description Amount 97212 10/15/2004 SHANNON SIMS Accounts Payable Check 130.00 97213 10/15/2004 DAVID L.SMAW Accounts Payable Check 85.00 97214 10/15/2004 STEIN'S DELI Accounts Payable Check 296.67 97215 10/15/2004 STEWART S WHEEL SHOP Accounts Payable Check 55.00 97216 10/15/2004 KURT W.STONE Accounts Payable Check 50.00 97217 10/15/2004 ROBERT STORCHHEIM Accounts Payable Check 38.00 97218 10/15/2004 MICHAEL STORNETTA Accounts Payable Check 220.00 97219 10/15/2004 BROCK T.STRATTON Accounts Payable Check 31.50 97220 10/15/2004 SUNLIGHT JANITORIAL Accounts Payable Check 1,657.50 97221 10/15/2004 SWITZER DIESEL REPAIR Accounts Payable Check 1,140.00 97222 10/15/2004 SYLVESTER'S SECURITY ALARMS Accounts Payable Check 120.00 97223 10/15/2004 MARCIA TORGERSON Accounts Payable Check 167.65 97224 10/15/2004 MARTIN TRACEY Accounts Payable Check 10.00 97225 10/15/2004 UNION ASPHALT,INC. Accounts Payable Check 107.59 97226 10/15/2004 UNISOURCE Accounts Payable Check 298.05 97227 10/15/2004 UNITED RENTALS NORTHWEST,INC Accounts Payable Check 650.72 097228 10/15/2004 USA BLUE BOOK Accounts Payable Check 114.38 97229 10/15/2004 VALLEY PACIFIC PETROLEUM SVCS Accounts Payable Check 2,220.71 97230 10/15/2004 IWINA VAN BEEK Accounts Payable Check 119.00 97231 10/15/2004 VERIZON WIRELESS Accounts Payable Check 541.34 97232 10/15/2004 BRIAN WESTERMAN Accounts Payable Check 220.00 97233 10/15/2004 WILSON LAND SURVEYS Accounts Payable Check 418.25 97234 10/21/2004 NORTH COAST ENGINEERING INC. Accounts Payable Check 28,613.88 97235 10/22/2004 ATASCADERO FIRE DEPT EMP.ASSN Payroll Vendor Payment 320.00 97236 10/22/2004 ATASCADERO MID MGRS ORG UNION Payroll Vendor Payment 20.00 97237 10/22/2004 ATASCADERO POLICE OFFICERS ASN Payroll Vendor Payment 400.29 97238 10/22/2004 FAMILY SUPPORT DIVISION Payroll Vendor Payment 207.69 97239 10/22/2004 EMPLOYMENT DEV DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 7,960.96 97240 10/22/2004 EMPLOYMENT DEV.DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 1,087.77 97241 10/22/2004 EQUITABLE LIFE Payroll Vendor Payment 348.88 97242 10/22/2004 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE Payroll Vendor Payment 7,245.00 97243 10/22/2004 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 Payroll Vendor Payment 300.00 97244 10/22/2004 KENNEDY CLUB FITNESS , Payroll Vendor Payment 110.00 97245 10/22/2004 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION Payroll Vendor Payment 861.94 97246 10/22/2004 PERS LONG TERM CARE PROGRAM Payroll Vendor Payment 16.19 48 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listine For the Month of October 2004 Check Check Number Date Vendor Description Amount 97247 10/22/2004 PUBLIC EMPL RETIREMENT SYSTEM Payroll Vendor Payment 53,657.27 97248 10/22/2004 SAVE OUR SERVICES FUND Payroll Vendor Payment 25.00 97249 10/22/2004 SEIU LOCAL 620 AFL-CIO Payroll Vendor Payment 649.36 97250 10/22/2004 SLO CREDIT UNION Payroll Vendor Payment 500.00 97251 10/22/2004 UNITED WAY OF SLO COUNTY Payroll Vendor Payment 28.00 313 10/23/2004 MID-STATE BANK Accounts Payable Check 90.00 314 10/23/2004 MID-STATE BANK Accounts Payable Check 24.00 315 10/23/2004 MID-STATE BANK Accounts Payable Check 30.00 312 10/26/2004 MID-STATE BANK Payroll Vendor Payment 34,732.51 97252 10/29/2004 ACCESS GRAPHICS Accounts Payable Check 3,115.13 97253 10/29/2004 A&T ARBORISTS Accounts Payable Check 300.00 97254 10/29/2004 ACCU-TEST ENGINEERING LAB,INC Accounts Payable Check 1,000.00 97255 10/29/2004 ACTION TOWING Accounts Payable Check 130.00 97256 10/29/2004 ACTIVE MEDICAL&SAFETY Accounts Payable Check 514.16 97257 10/29/2004 AFFSS SOUTHERN DIVISION Accounts Payable Check 50.00 97258 10/29/2004 KEITH AGGSON Accounts Payable Check 220.0 97259 10/29/2004 ALL ABOUT PRODUCE,CORP. Accounts Payable Check 1,009.15 97260 10/29/2004 ALL AMERICAN SEWER TOOLS Accounts Payable Check 138.78 97261 10/29/2004 ALLSTAR FIRE EQUIPMENT,INC. Accounts Payable Check 233.27 97262 10/29/2004 AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 49.23 97263 10/29/2004 AMERICAN SANITATION Accounts Payable Check 193.05 97264 10/29/2004 AMERICAN WEST TIRE&AUTO INC Accounts Payable Check 200.01 97265 10/29/2004 AMERICAN ZOO AND AQUARIUM ASSC Accounts Payable Check 85.00 97266 10/29/2004 AMK FOODSERVICE COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 220.89 97267 10/29/2004 ANDIAMO TELECOM Accounts Payable Check 36.96 97268 10/29/2004 ANTECH DIAGNOSTICS Accounts Payable Check 189.25 97269 10/29/2004 PAULA ANTON Accounts Payable Check 161.63 97270 10/29/2004 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 384.65 97271 10/29/2004 ATASCADERO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Accounts Payable Check 676.84 97272 10/29/2004 ATASCADERO FORD Accounts Payable Check 633.11 97273 10/29/2004 ATASCADERO HIGH SCHOOL Accounts Payable Check 50.00 97274 10/29/2004 ATASCADERO NEWS Accounts Payable Check 1,301.77 97275 10/29/2004 ATASCADERO RADIATOR Accounts Payable Check 231.6 97276 10/29/2004 ATASCADERO TEMPLE ASSOCIATION Accounts Payable Check 1,110.0 49 City of Ataseadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of October 2004 Check Check umber Date Vendor Description Amount 97277 10/29/2004 AVAYA INC. Accounts Payable Check 22.42 97278 10/29/2004 BANK OF NEW YORK Accounts Payable Check 2,473.80 97279 10/29/2004 ANN BANKS Accounts Payable Check 128.67 97280 10/29/2004 BASSETT'S CRICKET RANCH,INC. Accounts Payable Check 49.19 97281 10/29/2004 BATTERY SYSTEMS Accounts Payable Check 55.72 97282 10/29/2004 BEST BEST&KRIEGER LLP Accounts Payable Check 3,650.00 97283 10/29/2004 BEST SELF STORAGE Accounts Payable Check 56.77 97284 10/29/2004 BILLOW'S CUSTOM EMBROIDERY Accounts Payable Check 36.00 97285 10/29/2004 BURTON'S FIRE APPARATUS Accounts Payable Check 22.47 97286 10/29/2004 BUTLER BUSINESS MACHINES Accounts Payable Check 120.00 97287 10/29/2004 CA DEPT OF FISH&GAME Accounts Payable Check 772.75 97288 10/29/2004 CALIFORNIA CODE CHECK Accounts Payable Check 8,264.78 97289 10/29/2004 CANNON ASSOCIATES Accounts Payable Check 11,997.09 97290 10/29/2004 CCPOA Accounts Payable Check 30.00 97291 10/29/2004 CDF ACCOUNTING OFFICE Accounts Payable Check 55.00 97292 10/29/2004 CDW GOVERNMENT,INC. Accounts Payable Check 5,178.09 97293 10/29/2004 CENTRAL COAST STRIPING Accounts Payable Check 250.00 97294 10/29/2004 CHEVRON Accounts Payable Check 1,287.97 97295 10/29/2004. CHICAGO GRADE LANDFILL Accounts Payable Check 180.00 97296 10/29/2004 COAST ELECTRONICS Accounts Payable Check 1,793.22 97297 10/29/2004 COASTAL IMAGING SUPPLIES Accounts Payable Check 173.74 97298 10/29/2004 CONOCOPHILLIPS Accounts Payable Check 3,035.77 97299 10/29/2004 COOPERATIVE PERSONNEL SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 352.55 97300 10/29/2004 CPRS Accounts Payable Check 40.00 97301 10/29/2004 CPRS DISTRICT VIII Accounts Payable Check 50.00 97302 10/29/2004 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER Accounts Payable Check 151.00 97303 10/29/2004 CSMFO Accounts Payable Check 200.00 97304 10/29/2004 DECOU LUMBER COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 392.75 97305 10/29/2004 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Accounts Payable Check 1,783.00 97306 10/29/2004 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Accounts Payable Check 2,112.93 97307 10/29/2004 RON DUNCAN Accounts Payable Check 350.00 97308 10/29/2004 DURHAM COMMUNICATIONS INC Accounts Payable Check 320.00 97309 10/29/2004 ED'S FLY MEAT,INC. Accounts Payable Check 27.00 97310 10/29/2004 EDEN SYSTEMS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 562.50 0 97311 10/29/2004 EL CAMINO VETERINARY HOSP Accounts Payable Check 10.00 97312 10/29/2004 EMBLEM ENTERPRISES,INC. Accounts Payable Check 758.84 50 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listine For the Month of October 2004 Check Check Number Date Vendor Description Amount 97313 10/29/2004 EMS PERSONNEL FUND Accounts Payable Check 130.00 97314 10/29/2004 ENTENMANN-ROVIN CO. Accounts Payable Check 33.74 97315 10/29/2004 ESCUELA DEL RIO Accounts Payable Check 97.20 97316 10/29/2004 EXXON MOBIL Accounts Payable Check 1,455.41 97317 10/29/2004 FEDERAL EXPRESS Accounts Payable Check 51.63 97318 10/29/2004 FENCE FACTORY ATASCADERO Accounts Payable Check 408.82 97319 10/29/2004 FERRELL'S AUTO REPAIR Accounts Payable Check 408.85 97320 10/29/2004 FGL ENVIRONMENTAL Accounts Payable Check 179.60 97321 10/29/2004 FIRE MAINTENANCE COMPANY,LLC Accounts Payable Check 124.00 97322 10/29/2004 FIRE OUT UNIFORM COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 562.32 97323 10/29/2004 FIRSTLINE,LLC Accounts Payable Check 235.95 97324 10/29/2004 FOOD FOR LESS Accounts Payable Check 110.55 97325 10/29/2004 FRAZEE INDUSTRIES,INC. Accounts Payable Check 135.14 97326 10/29/2004 GAS COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 39.55 97327 10/29/2004 GATEWAY COMPANIES,INC. Accounts Payable Check 9,034.76 97328 10/29/2004 PETER GAW Accounts Payable Check 220.00 97329 10/29/2004 GEM AUTO PARTS Accounts Payable Check 286.16 97330 10/29/2004 GIBBS INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS Accounts Payable Check 133.89 97331 10/29/2004 DIANE E.GREENAWAY Accounts Payable Check 49.00 97332 10/29/2004 GRISANTI HARDWARE Accounts Payable Check 116.21 97333 10/29/2004 H.D.PETERSON Accounts Payable Check 76.46 97334 10/29/2004 HART IMPRESSIONS PRINT&COPY Accounts Payable Check 325.03 97335 10/29/2004 HARVEY'S HONEYHUTS Accounts Payable Check 59.50 97336 10/29/2004 HELPING HAND HEALTH EDUCATION Accounts Payable Check 70.00 97337 10/29/2004 GENE HICKS Accounts Payable Check 220.00 97340 10/29/2004 I.M.P.A.0 GOVERNMENT SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 19,997.31 97341 10/29/2004 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Accounts Payable Check 148.21 97342 10/29/2004 J.CARROLL Accounts Payable Check 786.13 97343 10/29/2004 JESPERSEN'S TIRE SERVICE,INC. Accounts Payable Check 23.50 97344 10/29/2004 JIFFY LUBE#1932 PCJL,INC. Accounts Payable Check 30.60 97345 10/29/2004 JOHN L.WALLACE&ASSOCIATES Accounts Payable Check 2,460.00 97346 10/29/2004 KEN'S MOBIL SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 2,362.28 97347 10/29/2004 DAREN KENNETT Accounts Payable Check 42.89 97348 10/29/2004 KPRL 1230 AM Accounts Payable Check 275.00 97349 10/29/2004 L.N.CURTIS&SONS Accounts Payable Check 290.81 51 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listine For the Month of October 2004 Check Check umber Date Vendor Description Amount 97350 10/29/2004 LEE WILSON ELECTRIC CO.INC Accounts Payable Check 1,120.00 97351 10/29/2004 LEHI VALLEY WHOLESALE Accounts Payable Check 170.20 97352 10/29/2004 LEXIS NEXIS MATTHEW BENDER Accounts Payable Check 728.24 97353 10/29/2004 LOCATE PLUS CORPORATION Accounts Payable Check 3.50 97354 10/29/2004 DAVID J.LODEN Accounts Payable Check 30.00 97355 10/29/2004 LONGS DRUG STORES Accounts Payable Check 28.38 97357 10/29/2004 MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK,INC. Accounts Payable Check 542.85 97358 10/29/2004 KERRY MARGASON Accounts Payable Check 29.62 97359 10/29/2004 MATHIS&ASSOCIATES Accounts Payable Check 3,773.72 97360 10/29/2004 WADE MCKINNEY Accounts Payable Check 175.75 97361 10/29/2004 MEDWORKS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 330.00 97362 10/29/2004 MID-COAST MOWER&SAW Accounts Payable Check 47.88 97363 10/29/2004 MID-STATE SOLID WASTE&RECYCG Accounts Payable Check 130.05 97364 10/29/2004MINER'S ACE HARDWARE Accounts Payable Check 329.91 97365 10/29/2004 MATTHEW J.MIRANDA Accounts Payable Check 236.00 97366 10/29/2004 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 120.47 97367 10/29/2004 MICHAL S.MOSES Accounts Payable Check 652.68 97368 10/29/2004 MPI MICROFILM SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 9.05 97369 10/29/2004 DAVID MUEHLHAUSEN Accounts Payable Check 107.00 97370 10/29/2004 MUNIFINANCIAL Accounts Payable Check 2,272.68 97371 10/29/2004 NATIONAL STAFFING LLC Accounts Payable Check 1,177.10 97372 10/29/2004 NEWCO DISTRIBUTORS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 479.07 97373 10/29/2004 NORTH COUNTY GLASS Accounts Payable Check 11.07 97374 10/29/2004 NORTH COUNTY SEPTIC SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 370.00 97375 10/29/2004 OFFICE DEPOT INC. Accounts Payable Check 229.44 97376 10/29/2004 OMNI-MEANS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 374.00 97377 10/29/2004 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE Accounts Payable Check 42.89 97378 10/29/2004 OUTLET TOOL SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 182.17 97379 10/29/2004 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC Accounts Payable Check 3,541.76 97380 10/29/2004 PASO ROBLES SAFE&LOCK Accounts Payable Check 87.92 97381 10/29/2004 PERRY'STARCEL SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 113.71 97382 10/29/2004 PETE JOHNSTON CHEVROLET Accounts Payable Check 138.18 97383 10/29/2004 PIERSON ELECTRIC Accounts Payable Check 1,856.00 97384 10/29/2004 SCOTT E.PIPAN Accounts Payable Check 215.50 97385 10/29/2004 POOR RICHARD'S PRESS Accounts Payable Check 109.34 97386 10/29/2004 PROCARE JANITORIAL SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 223.03 52 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listine For the Month of October 2004 Check Check Number Date Vendor Description Amount 97387 10/29/2004 PROGRESSIVE MEDICAL INTERNATIO Accounts Payable Check173.41 97388 10/29/2004 PSC INDUSTRIAL OUTSCOURCING IN Accounts Payable Check 590.00 97389 10/29/2004 GRACE L.PUCCI Accounts Payable Check 1,140.00 97390 10/29/2004 QUILL CORPORATION Accounts Payable Check 354.39 97391 10/29/2004 RADIO SHACK CORPORATION Accounts Payable Check 32.92 97392 10/29/2004 RANGE MASTERS Accounts Payable Check 19.22 97393 10/29/2004 RECOGNITION WORKS Accounts Payable Check 106.12 97394 10/29/2004 CAROLE ROBINSON Accounts Payable Check 400.00 97395 10/29/2004 STEVE ROBINSON DVM Accounts Payable Check 600.00 97396 10/29/2004 STEVE ROMO Accounts Payable Check 51.00 97397 10/29/2004 SAN LUIS OBISPO CO LABORATORY Accounts Payable Check 155.00 97398 10/29/2004 SAN LUIS OBISPO CO TAX COLLECT Accounts Payable Check 1,760.16 97399 10/29/2004 SAN LUIS OBISPO SUPERIOR COURT Accounts Payable Check 6,500.00 97400 10/29/2004 SAN LUIS PAINTS Accounts Payable Check 4.34 97401 10/29/2004 SCOTT SATTERTHWAITE Accounts Payable Check 220.00 97402 10/29/2004 SBC Accounts Payable Check 159.36 97403 10/29/2004 SBC/MC1 Accounts Payable Check 265.7 6 97404 10/29/2004 SHELL Accounts Payable Check 44.6 97405 10/29/2004 JOHN SIEMENS Accounts Payable Check 396.40 97406 10/29/2004 SILVERADO STAGES INC. Accounts Payable Check 1,453.91 97407 10/29/2004 DAVID L.SMAW Accounts Payable Check 34.00 97408 10/29/2004 JASON SMITH Accounts Payable Check 220.00 97409 10/29/2004 STALKER RADAR Accounts Payable Check 3,548.89 97410 10/29/2004 STATE WATER RES CONTROL BOARD Accounts Payable Check 205.55 97411 10/29/2004 GARI STINEBAUGH Accounts Payable Check 183.76 97412 10/29/2004 KURT W. STONE Accounts Payable Check 80.00 97413 10/29/2004 SUN BADGE COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 51.51 97414 10/29/2004 SUPERIOR QUALITY COPIERS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 707.85 97415 10/29/2004 TED MILES JEEP Accounts Payable Check 38.07 97416 10/29/2004 TEMPLETON UNIFORMS Accounts Payable Check 607.10 97418 10/29/2004 TIME WARNER TELECOM Accounts Payable Check 2,570.83 97419 10/29/2004 MARCIA TORGERSON Accounts Payable Check 255.75 97420 10/29/2004 TRIBUNE Accounts Payable Check 865.25 97421 10/29/2004 UC REGENTS Accounts Payable Check 125.00 97422 10/29/2004 GREGORY UGARTE D.V.M. Accounts Payable Check 200.0 53 City of Ataseadero Disbursement Listine For the Month of October 2004 Check Check A197 b-er Date Vendor Description Amount 97423 10/29/2004 ULTREX BUSINESS PRODUCTS Accounts Payable Check .446.53 97424 10/29/2004 UNION ASPHALT,INC. Accounts Payable Check 353.98 97425 10/29/2004 UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY-SLO CO Accounts Payable Check 2,000.00 97426 10/29/2004 UNITED GREEN MARK,INC. Accounts Payable Check 147.15 97427 10/29/2004 UPS Accounts Payable Check 136.07 97428 10/29/2004 VALLEY PACIFIC PETROLEUM SVCS Accounts Payable Check 2,475.45 97429 10/29/2004 TOM VELASQUEZ Accounts Payable Check 51.00 97430 10/29/2004 VERIZON WIRELESS Accounts Payable Check 466.23 97431 10/29/2004 TOM WAY Accounts Payable Check 80.00 97432 10/29/2004 NANCY E.WEBBER,PH.D. Accounts Payable Check 290.00 97433 10/29/2004 WESTERN JANITOR SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 181.61 97434 10/29/2004 WILLIAM P.WHITE Accounts Payable Check 220.00 $ 1,286,868.65 54 ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 12/14/04 ■ nn n ■ 1918 n 199 Atascadero City Council Staff Report- City Manager's Office City Council 2005 Meeting Schedule RECOMMENDATION: Council approve City Council meeting schedule for 2005. DISCUSSION: The City Council, pursuant to Chapter 2, Section 1.01 of the Atascadero Municipal Code, meets the second and fourth Tuesday of each month. On occasion, the Council will hold special study sessions and/or joint meetings with one or both of the Commissions on a fifth Tuesday. Generally, in the summer months, the Council meets once a month and avoids conflicts with major holidays. Staff has prepared the attached schedule for the year 2005 to help in the coordination of these meetings with personal schedules. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENT: City Council 2005 Meeting Schedule 55 ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 12/14/04 City of A tascadero Office of the City Clerk Atascadero City Council 2005 Meeting Schedule MEETING DATE TYPE OF MEETING Januaryl l Regular January25 Regular February 8 Regular February 22 Regula March 8 Regular March 22 Regular March 29 Special Study Sessions and/or Joint Meetings with one or both of the Commissions tentative April 12 Regular April 26 Re ular May 10 Regular May 24 Regular May 31 Special Study Sessions and/or Joint Meetings with one or both of the Commissions tentative June 14 Regular June 28 Re ular July 12 Regular August 9 Regular September 13 Regular September 27 Regular October 11 Regular October 25 Regular November 8 Regular -November 22 Regular November 29 Special Study Sessions and/or Joint Meetings with one or both of the Commissions tentative December 13 Regular 6905 El Camino Real, Suite 6, Atascadero, CA 93422 461-5000 ext. 3400 _56 ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 12/14/04 p ■t t ■ 1918 19 8 I CAD Atascadero City Council Staff Report- Community Services Department Recreation Center Site Selection RECOMMENDATIONS: Council: I. Approve the selection of the Traffic Way/Hay & Feed/City Corporation Yard site for development of the Recreation Center building; and, 2. _;Direct the City Manager to proceed with the development of a Youth/Community Center building and site plan for the Traffic Way location; • and, 3. Direct the City Manager to prepare a plan for the relocation of the Corporation Yard and the removal of unnecessary waste water related facilities. DISCUSSION: Summary: Since 1991, the community has been organizing and fundraising to realize a youth center facility in Atascadero. The processhasinvolved many players and has gone through different iterations. A detailed historical account on the efforts to build a youth center are included in Attachment "1." Most recently, discussion regarding the youth center has been centered around the location of the center, the aggressive timeline, and the amount of funding we will.end up receiving from FEMA. At a special joint meeting of the City Council and the Community Redevelopment Agency on September 28, 2004, the City Council directed that a request for an improved project be made to FEMA for the youth/ recreation center. An improved project request is necessary because the site is being moved and the Printery will no longer house the youth center.- The City is awaiting a decision from FEMA regarding the project worksheet for the Printery at which time an improved project request may be submitted. While the Hay and Feed location is still "ready to go", the anticipated new funding resulting from the loss of the Printery has resulted in consideration being given to construction of a new building. Numerous locations have been considered in the past and more recently over the past two months. 57 ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 12/14/04 At the Parks and Recreation Commission meeting of October 21, 2004, the Commission considered a variety of sites including: the school district's bus barn site, property' adjacent to San 'Benito Elementary School, portions of the Junior High 7th grade campus Paloma Creek Park, the wrecking yard on Traffic Way, the National Guard Armory, property at the Lake Park and a combination site of Traffic Way/ Corporation Yard/ Hay and Feed site. The Parks and Recreation Commission incorporated a matrix which included different criteria to facilitate evaluation of each site. The;public was also invited to complete the matrix for each potential location. The Traffic Way site and the Lake Park site emerged as the most desirable locations, with the Traffic Way site being identified as thepreferredsite by the Commission and the public. Evaluation criteria included: parking adequacy, accessibility, potential for future expansion of facilities, land owned by the city, suitability with surrounding neighborhood, impact on current property uses, aesthetics, anticipated cost to develop the site and feasibility of completing a project within two years on the site. The results of both the Commission evaluation and the public input are attached (Attachment "2"). The Parks and Recreation Commission recommended 6-1, to proceed with the development of the Traffic Way Park/Corporation Yard/Hay and Feed site and proceed with conceptual designs as quickly as possible. On November 2"a, 2004, the Atascadero Youth Task Force also recommended proceeding with the Traffic Way site. It is imperative that the City choose an alternative that can be completed within two years. The urgency stems from a FEMA requirement that states that an improved project must be completed no later than three years from the earthquake event on December 22nd, 2003. Therefore, the City will have two years from today's date to have the project complete and all funds expended. Analysis: A site for an improved project must be selected quickly. Staff has outlined the most prominent advantages and disadvantages of the two most desirable sites to facilitate the Council's decision. Traffic Way/Corps Yard/ Hay &Feed Combination Site -`Staff recommended site. City staff joins the Parks and Recreation Commission and the Youth Task Force in recommending the Traffic Way Park/ Public Works-Corporation Yard/ Hay and Feed combination site as the preferred location for the following reasons: - The property is owned by the City. - There is ample space to accommodate a new building (approx. 20,000sq. ft.), a skate park (10,000sq ft.), and potential future facilities such as a municipal pool, batting cages, paintball course, indoor soccer arena, playground, etc.The,proximity of the area to the downtown and the Junior High School. There`is,plenty of space for parking. - The Federal and State Grant funding that the. City has in place can be used on an expanded rehabilitation project at the combination site. Also, Redevelopment Agency funding and Prop. 12 funding can also be used at this location. 58 ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 12/14/04 To use FEMA funding to complete the skate park project, the skate park would need to be part of the recreation center project. The skate park should not be located out of downtown where the skaters have historically skated prior to the George Beatie skate park being built. (Skating in commercial areas downtown has been a problem for merchants in the past.) The City already has a park at the location. Placing the recreation center and skate park there along with other features to be identified later in a site plan, the City has the opportunity to create a recreation center complex with synergy with many other potential uses. The recreation center complex could become one of the City's finest public facilities. The development of this site could occur quickly, particularly if the building is situated on a portion of the property that is presently clear of existing improvements. With industrial uses nearby and an existing public park adjacent, a recreation center would have minimal impact on the surrounding neighborhood. - The proposed use would clean up the waste water overflow ponds. The City's environmental consultant, Komex, reported no significant findings at the site, therefore the site is clean. Conversion of the property to other uses should not be a problem. Waste Water Funds would be used to clean up the overflow ponds. - The new use would consolidate Public Works field operations by relocating Corporation Yard to the Waste Water Plant. Redevelopment Agency Funds and sewer funds may be used to relocate the Corporation Yard. - A pedestrian trail connection could be made along Atascadero Creek from downtown to the recreation center complex. The creek would be fenced to inhibit kids from entering the creek along the trail. This trail segment is currently being planned independent of the project. Site disadvantages are: - Time and resources would be necessary to demolish the existing Public Works facilities and relocate the operations to the Waste Water Plant. - The location is in an industrial zone, which could be considered unattractive and undesirable. - The site may have other industrial or commercial uses. Atascadero Lake Park Site Site advantages are: - The property is owned by the City. The development of the site could occur quickly. - The Lake Park could be an attractive site for the recreation center, which compliments existing park uses. - The location is one of the better public areas in the city, and is surrounded by a residential area. 59 ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 12/14/04 Site disadvantages are: - Placing the recreation center at the Lake Park does not conform to the take Park Master Plan adopted by the Council through the public master plan process. If the Council decides to locate the facility there, the master plan would have to be revisited. Without any new facilities or uses, the Lake Park presently suffers from inadequate parking, particularly on summer weekends. New public facilities added to the Lake Park willonly exacerbate the parking problem. Additional parking cannot be accommodated without altering the present master plan and impacting some current uses. Redevelopment Agency funds are more difficult to use at the Lake Park. - Selection of this site jeopardizes $492,000 in State funding (Senator O'Connell's grant) as the funds were stipulated for the Hay and Feed location. A change in the location would require the State legislature's approval. - $397,640 in Federal funding (Congressman Thomas' grant), would not be eligible to be used at another location, including the Lake Park. The Lake Park site is not a rehabilitation project, as required. Additionally,. the grant application deadline for a project is December 31St, 2004, making the Lake Park site impossible to process (due to NEPA requirements, timing, etc.). - The size of vacant property at the corner of the Lake Park (Hwy. 41 & Portola Rd.) is too small to accommodate a 20,000sq. ft. recreation center, additional parking, a 10,000sq. ft. skate park and a potential future pool. Anything more than the center building would require the conversion of existing facilities in the Lake Park Master Plan. An example would be relocating the Babe Ruth field to another site to accommodate other uses. Such relocations could be very disruptive and costly. - The accessibility of the location by transit dependent kids in the community is problematic. It is not close to downtown, nor the junior high. - State Highway 41 is a very busy regional highway. It is not pedestrian friendly, particularly for kids. Traffic volumes on the highway would be a concern for pedestrian safety. This is particularly true for kids approaching from the west. Conclusion: The Parks and Recreation Commission, The Atascadero Youth Task Force, a majority of members of the Atascadero Community Coalition and city staff recommend the Traffic Way/ Corporation Yard/ Hay and Feed site for the recreation center. Once a site is selected, staff recommends that Council authorize the City Manager to proceed with site and building development. There have been many public processes to develop community opinion on the necessary attributes to be housed in the facility. Staff can take the existing information and begin developing the project. This streamlining will help keep the project on a tight timeframe. 60 ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 12/14/04 FISCAL IMPACT: The amount of FEMA funding for the improved project will not be known for some time. The final approved amount will result from a negotiated process which could take a few months. Establishing a project budget will consist of combining recreation center project funds on hand with additional FEMA funding. Federal and State grants procured for the project may not be affected if the Council decides to move ahead with the current plans for the Traffic Way combination site. The Federal Grant for $397,640 that Congressman Thomas helped the city obtain is due on December 31st, 2004, with the project environmental documentation complete. All funding currently budgeted for the recreation center project is eligible to be applied to the Traffic Way combination site. Much of the currently budgeted funding as described the analysis section of this report would be jeopardized if the Lake Park site is chosen for the center. The size and scope of the final project will directly affect the ongoing maintenance and operations costs. This concern should be factored in to the project scope ultimately chosen. ALTERNATIVES: Do not build a new building and proceed with the city's present remodeling plans for the Hay and Feed building: ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 —Youth Center background Attachment 2 — Commission Site Evaluation Matrix Attachment 3 — Commission recommended skate park design drawings. Attachment 4 — Lake Park Master Plan Attachment 5 — Site Maps Attachment 6 - Correspondence i 61 ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 12/14/04 ATTACHMENT "1" Youth Center Project Background: In 1991, a group of people got together to discuss the need for a youth center in Atascadero. The group later (1993) formed the Atascadero Recreation Center Committee (ARCC), a private non-profit group to raise awareness and funding to develop a youth center in partnership with the City of Atascadero. In 1994, the Masonic Temple Association offered to give the historic Printery and Temple building to the city to be used as a youth center. The Masons kept 1% ownership of the building. Later, a consultant for the city reported that the building needed extensive seismic retrofit and other infrastructure improvements. ARCC continued to raise money for a youth center, and helped build the George Beatie Skate Park. On July 24, 2001 the City Council unanimously authorized the purchase of the Atascadero Hay and Feed building at 5493 Traffic Way for renovation as a youth/ recreation center. More than $1.1 million dollars has been raised to help build the recreation center. This figure includes federal and state grants (thanks to Congressman Thomas and former Senator O'Connell) and focal fundraising. Design plans were developed for the Hay and Feed building, and the recreation center plans were put out to tpblic bid. The City Council rejected the sole bid of $2.4 million dollars on August 24 , 2004. 62 w p M j = zLLJ ap Z 0 0 N a a j Z U U W Opp � o °o a ° O � M 0I ONw � z U F O � W � cn QN 0 x Qi xizva F- k= :3 Z D Z Q Fa„ !a- w Q Ww cn � waw a„a as U) x w � J W U) z awo wiW _ I- IV HHHU) p,p H Q 0- OLLL w Oi= W w U Q Z iz 0 w� J � -i� a j M a 0 0 U) Qi U) 0 = Z ¢ j w WJU �: w � . Uwcn0E- _ Up U a O In ! OIL �0 0 iU) I HWH C9 0w � z U p H p W j OC.) p J m I -- -- tCL 0' Ali Z 0 wp W w Q Imp �N m x Z M m m Z Fn >- w CI) p O J U) Z ° o ° w a O jOI° I a > x a iU a a U LL �. 0 iz z m � � x a - U , p Wiu 'Y 4 O a � � > U) a � a � a a aLL <'� 1 J za a a aU J tee. IL >- x acts cn'� 63 N C "t` 00 Co � 00 00 C) M Co M N N N N N (v r- V a. a d' M I` C N N LO 'tet N Co (4 o o) ti � r-- -r-- m m ti t` co I` ._ CO CO CO M M N N N N N N O V a 0=. o ® 5: 0 w Q o v 0 0- � _ UJ< w � � c a zJ � IL Cl) QCl) W m t z0 �' m a Z = W o o Z J H 0 Cl)W � Q o u- LLa L) U ti z Ivo 00 uj LL w n o O w w 0 o 0 E- ar YM > > a W � C=/)) � 64 -1v CL < j < lz a: q< co 0 z U-c o o G q O M O L N OI u O � � N U Q a Z� W(1_/ U 0 O C) w� W0 C) �h <L Q i( f � I 65 M � I I OW-1 O / Q - r � .e- o _ r . �, �� `fit'``�. �' � S��' '- za- tii "'s.r =�� 'r,�{$. �• FA i b '3 2 r T `l L a� r b s y < . z .fir, P .� 2 � S a aaa bad 'l8 3 k mod€ l* '£ � c 3! t Nota, 1 a a �`. � � �„k� � �� s u fix'- s z -�� 6 r �/ & ng V4 as V Call 6 `' � ) Q "4 � vii-. k ssa'*.:�j'£�q-j-. J r 4},��'� �t� �ASa "rt<� �� 4 ..: " _ 3 may` w A� ka a,•I ;✓ w `, ,p ,yw,a ° .; std a r4` r a °«.-,fit ,_' '• a ,� "x `I � " i � ugly i "3', '4 q t l a;^w' 3a3 It you j ss i �. � s�A s �,..� � �,"�k`�l a s �" •i .�� 6�"�, � � �.� '� y � a� + fry"'� t?'•• ^ �. . ,' a+ Baa ai �r$'ia4 �tsti � .. z — PIPE x PR v za I - z m" m s �'�� ,g,,a y " a��`"�` ,. :a'F ✓�,y C�„moi '� �� '� � �� ' NMI A AW `. t a � $*? �• �� - �§ae els ��l � �� H .z`o „r'v €' � r� ze d n t I e R�3a "PION� Qqmj yj am 7 r a to - ka �.. a x� ''t 3�'�' �° � r .. L`' St UO ,a z=iE NqA . s y`Ya a Wits, IZ „7' , , Awl .. - ,,..^ NW a � `•,( -r s �� N x g „z2*A 10 mm r .930 ma v Vol v"u ATASCADERO YOUTH TASK FORCE 5805 Capistrano Ave, Suite G, Atascadero, Ca. 93422 (805) 466-5465 Fax: (805)- 466-5343 y Web address: atascaderoyouth.com Y Email: link@calinet.com A community committed to youth so youth can be committed to the community The Atascadero Youth Task Force recognizes the inherent capabilities of the community to provide service and support to youth. The Atascadero Youth Task Force will strive to facilitate open communication and develop ways to empower the community to identify issues and create opportunities for solutions. November 30,2004 ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL 6905 EL CAMINO REAL, SUITE 6 ATASCADERO, CA 93422 The Atascadero Youth Task Force(AYTF) comprised of over 35 members of the community and many of the significant agencies voted at their November meeting to support the selection of the Traffic Way,Equipment Yard,Hay and Feed Building combination site for the new Youth Center. The AYTF has been involved in advocating and promoting a youth center since its inception in 1991. They have followed the twists and turns in the progress and are familiar with the options. They have participated in various studies and discussions and are in a position to understand the pros and cons of the various sites. It is our opinion that the recommended site is both the most accessible for youth and will create a second major recreation area for the community. We urge the council to move quickly and unanimously to approve the combination site on traffic way and take the appropriate actions to secure FEMA funding including meeting the all important time lines. On behalf of the AYTF Barbie Butz nife ynes Chair 2S 69 ITEM NUMBER: B-2 DATE: 12/14/04 1918. - 18 6 III Atascadero City Council Staff Report - Community Development Department Solar Energy System Permit 4515 Rosita Avenue (BLD-2003-3148) RECOMMENDATION: Council give staff direction. DISCUSSION: Background: On September 26,'2003, Gary Brom the property owner of 4515.Rosita Avenue applied for a building permit to install a "pole mounted solar panel". The iapplication was accepted by the City and assigned tracking number BLD-2003-3148. The permit was routed to the Building and Planning Departments for plan check review. The Planning Department returned corrections on October 15, 2003, requesting setbacks and heights of the structure be shown on the plans. The corrected plans were resubmitted to the City on October 21, 2003, with the setbacks and heights shown on the plans. The plans indicated that the solar collector panel would be setback 5'-9" from the side property line and that the maximum height of the collector would be 17'-6 high. The plans were checked against the Atascadero Municipal Code's zoning ordinance (AMC) for compliance with the setback and height requirements of the LSF-X zoning district. The minimum side-yard setback for structures in the LSF-X Zoning District is 5-feet (AMC 9-4.107). Setbacksaremodified by AMC 9-4.110(c) which allows that "solar collectors may project into-a required setback only as allowed by the Uniform Building Code." The minimum setback allowed by the Uniform Building Code in this district is 3 feet. Since the permit drawings-indicate that the solarcollector.never swings closer than 5'-9" to the property line, staff determined the projectwasconsistent with the setback requirement. 70 ITEM NUMBER: I B-2 DATE: 12/14/04 The maximum height for structures in the LSF-X Zoning District is 30-feet-(AMC 9- 4.113). Heights are-modified by AMC 9-4.113(b)(4)(ix) which allows "solar collectors not more than five feet above the height limit specified in subsection (a) [30-feet] of this section." Therefore, the maximum allowable height for a solar collector is 35-feet. The Permit drawings indicate that the maximum height of the solar collector's movement is 17'-6" in height; therefore, staff determined the project was consistent with the City's height regulations, . `%%A V? 0 — � k R� 4711-1 L t ) •7 i t 4` - Approved building permit drawing BLD-2003-3148 The Planning 'Department determined the permit was consistent with City zoning standards on October 28, 2003, and approved the permit for issuance. The permit was issued to Mr. Brom on November 3, 2003. An inspection of the footing for the solar collector was approved on January 29, 2004 and the project was signed off as final on April 14,>2004. 71 ITEM NUMBER: B-2 DATE: 12/14/04 4455 Tranquilla Avenue Approximate Broder Residence ` Solar Y i Collector 4515 Rosita Avenue Brom Residence The. neighbor, Dennis Broder, 4455 Tranquilla Avenue contacted the City about his concerns with the location of the solar collector in early 2004. According to Mr. Broder building and planning staff told him that the collector was consistent with City requirements. In July 2004, Jim Patterson contacted staff on behalf of Mr. Broder about a problem with a solar panel on Rosita Avenue. The permit files and zoning ordinance were reviewed again to determine if the permit was issued in error. Mr. Patterson was contacted on July 27, 2004 and told that the permit was consistent with the Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Broder contacted the Community Development Director in late August to express his concerns about the solar collector. Mr. Broder stated that he was concerned about the setback, height, noise, glare and overall visual impact of the solar collector. The Director notified Mr. Broder that the permit appeared to have been issued consistent with City standards, but offered to investigate the matter further. The Director visited the site twice in early September to see the solar collector and Listen to the drive motor. Based on the site visits, the building plans, the Zoning Ordinance, and California State Law, staff issued a letter to Mr. Broder dated September 14, 2004 (attached) that formally responded to his concerns. . The letter explained that staff had determined that the permit was consistent with the City's setback ordinance and height ordinance. Furthermore, the letter stated that the 72 ITEM NUMBER: B-2 DATE: 12/14/04 City's Zoning Ordinance only regulated glare associated with electrical lighting and that motor did not appear to violate the Noise Ordinance. is After receiving the letter, Mr. Broder contacted staff to express his dissatisfaction with the findings of the letter. At the October 26, 2004 City Council Meeting, Mr. Broder spoke during public comment and submitted a document regarding his concern with the solar collector (attached). The Council directed staff to prepare a report on the issue for the Council's review. -4455 Tranquilla 4515 Rosita Avenue Avenue solar Brom Residence '�i 19 Collector Broder Residence , d. h I W'E-11 h h £ ti m w Site visit early September 2004 Analysis: Photovoltaic Collectors 73 ITEM NUMBER: B -2 DATE: 12/14/04 The solar collector project consists of a large 10'-9" by 15'-5" photovoltaic collector attached to a 14-foot tall steel column. The column is anchored in an 8'-9" deep reinforced concrete footing. The photovoltaic collector generates up to 2200 watts and is tied back into the electrical panel so that excess electric is "sold back" to PG&E. In order for the collector to operate at maximum efficiency, it must be located in an area and at a height where it is not shaded. In addition, the collector must be in a position perpendicular to the sun to maximize solar radiation at all times. Since the sun continually moves and follows a different track through the sky every day of the year, the collector moves slightly every couple of minutes. The angle and rotation of the collector also varies significantly from summer to winter. On"rainy days the collector moves to a flat position and does not move at all. On partly cloudy days the collector may readjust it position as clouds cast shadows. The collector is moved by a motor that makes an audible sound typically for a second. State Law California Government Code Section 65850.5(a) prohibits a City from enacting "an ordinance that has the effect of prohibiting or of unreasonably restricting the use of solar energy systems..." As such, staff review of the building permit was legally limited to checking for compliance with height and setback requirements. If the City were to create new regulations for solar collectors that ordinance would have to comply with State Law. Revisions to this code section will become effective in January 2005 and will further limit a City's ability to regulate solar collectors. California Government Code Section 65850.5 65850.5. (a) The legislative body of any city or county shall not enact an ordinance that has the effect of prohibiting or of unreasonably restricting the use of solar energy systems other than for the preservation or protection of the public health or safety. This prohibition shall be applicable to charter cities because the promotion of the use of non-fossil fuel sources of energy, including solar energy and energy conservation measures, is a matter of statewide concern. (b) This section shall not apply to ordinances that impose reasonable restrictions on solar energy systems. However, it is the policy of the state to promote and encourage the use of solar energy systems and to remove obstacles thereto. Accordingly, reasonable restrictions on a solar energy system are those restrictions that do not significantly increase the cost of the system or significantly decrease its efficiency, or that allow for an alternative system of comparable cost and efficiency. (c) For the purposes of this section, ,solar energy system" shall have the same meaning as set forth in Section 801.5 of the Civil Code. In addition to the State requirements, the City of Atascadero's Municipal Code (AMC) provides special exceptions for the increased height (AMC 9-4.113(b)(4)(ix)) and decreased setback of solar collectors (AMC 9-4.110(c)). The City has no appearance or site plan review requirements for accessory structures or solar collectors. 74 ITEM NUMBER: B -2 DATE: 12/14/04 Setback Because the solar collector is in continuous movement, determining the exact height and setback of the structure is difficult. To complicate the issue further, the property line between Brom and Broder does not follow the fence line because of a use easement. This means that solar collector's setback is not measured from the fence but rather a point approximately 18-inches into Mr. Broder's yard (refer to diagram below). Fence line ` .• Property Ii . ne y • r i Solar Collector Setback • Brom appears to be ` Property between 4 and 5 feet without • survey Br+o►der Solar Property ' Collector Actual Property Fence line Line �leEalt On November 4, 2004 staff met Mr. Broder at his house to measure the solar collector's setback. Due to the rain, the solar collector was in a flat position and alignment that appeared to be at nearly the closest position the collector can travel toward the property line. Using a tape measure and estimating the location of the property line based on two property corner survey flags, staff measured the collector to be approximately 57-inches from the property line. Given that the exact property line is unknown and the collector will swing somewhat closer staff believes the closet point of travel of the collector is between 4 and 5 feet of the property line. The only way to determine the setback more precisely would be with survey equipment and a manual override of the collector to rotate it to its closest position. Staff was unable to determine the height of the structure and that wouldrequire a survey as well. 75 ITEM NUMBER: B-2 DATE: 12/14/04 E. Dt ATO-fzvT&TT i'F-W-F- _P I J f` Picture submitted from Mr.Broder showing solar collector 3-feet from fence line. The fence line is not the Property line. Since the construction plans indicated the setback to be 5'-9" staff believes the collector's setback is inconsistent with the approved plans. However, it does not appear that the collector is in violation of the Zoning Ordinance. Staff has contacted Mr. Brom and requested that a formal survey of the collector's setback be submitted to the City. Once the actual setback is determined staff will work with Mr. Brom to remedy the setback. Mr. Brom has stated in his letter (attached) that the collector array could be shifted on the support structure. Staff has also requested that the height of the collector be surveyed as well. Since the maximum height for a solar collector is 35-feet, the collector is not in violation of the Zoning Ordinance, but may be inconsistent with the approved plans. The remedy to resolve this issue would be for Mr. Brom to submit a revised plan indicating the as built height of the collector. These changes would ensure that the collector is in conformance with all applicable City zoning standards and consistent with the issued plans. However, this would do little to address Mr. Broder's primary concern about the blocked view and aesthetics of the collector. Regarding this issue, the City has no regulation that could be applied. The City has no viewshed protection ordinances and no appearance review requirements for single family residential dwellings or accessory structures. Permits for all types of accessory structures are ministerial building permits. Staff is legally required to issue ministerial permits that are consistent with the Building Code and Zoning Ordinance. 76 ITEM NUMBER: B -2 DATE: 12/14/04 �P 12pv paten ( t-bw 17'-lam" TI I ' VA WW tOPOM W S IC Wtr� Minor changes to the setback of the collector would do little to address Mr.'Broder's viewshed concerns. The City has no regulations that protect viewshed or require appearance review of accessory structures or solar collectors. Noise Mr. Broder claims that the solar collector violates the City's noise ordinance. The maximum noise levels allowed within the City limits are regulated by AMC Title 9 Chapter 14. The noise levels are measured in decibels with different standards during the day than at night. Since the solar array operates during the day, it is subject to the following regulations: Daytime (7 a.m. to 9 p.m.) Maximum dB 70, Hourly Equivalent Sound Level (Leq, dB) 50. During staff's visit to the site, it was noted that the solar array periodically moves to track the sun. Staff stood at the property line on Rosita Avenue with direct line of sight to the array and noted the sound of the motor was a barely audible "whir sound" and lasted approximately one to two seconds. It appeared that the array moves every two to three minutes. During two other visits to the site the collect did not make any sound due to cloud cover. It does not appear that the periodic movement of the array is an obvious violation of the City's Noise Ordinance. However, the only way to determine for sure would be for a professional noise survey to be conducted and then to mathematically calculate the average Leq sound levels. The Leq takes into account periodic noises with periods of silence. 77 ITEM NUMBER: B-2 DATE: 12/14/04 As a compromise solution, Mr. Brom is willing to install a muffler device around the motor to reduce its sound. Staff is 'recommending that the muffler be installed as a remedy to the noise issue. Glare Mr. Broder is claiming that the solar collector creates a glare that violates the City Ordinance. The City of Atascadero only regulates glare related to electrical lighting (AMC 9-4.137) and has no glare or reflectivity regulations related to structures. Since the construction and orientation of the solar array is necessary for the system to work, it is likely that the State law would preempt the City from regulating this issue. Staff visited the site at noon and 5:00 p.m. on September 9, 2004 to investigate the glare issue further. At noon, the array was oriented southeast away from Mr. Broder's property and was casting shadows toward the Broder property. At 5:00 p.m., the array had swung to the east facing Mr. Broder's property. Based on Mr. Broder's photographs and the changing orientation of the collector, it is quite likely that light is periodically reflected toward Mr. Broder's property. Since the City has no regulations for glare related to structures and the State preempts the City from restricting the efficiency of solar collectors, the City has limited remedies available to address this issue. Mr. Brom does offer in his letter to install landscaping that would screen the collector from Mr. Broder's property. This likely is the best available solution. Alternative Locations The Council requested that staff investigate the possibility of having the solar collector moved or mounted on the roof. Mr. Brom addressed this issue in his letter and stated that the collector site was chosen to avoid tree shadows and be close to the electrical panel. Do to the substantial size of the foundation and support structure, moving the collector would likely be very expensive. It is staff's understanding that Mr. Brom is opposed to relocating the collector. Solar collectors are often mounted on the roofs of houses. These types of collectors produce less electricity because their orientation to the sun does not change. While it is theoretically possible that the solar collector could be placed on the house's roof, that is not the project that Mr. Brom applied to build. In the absence of an Ordinance that prohibits free standing solar collector, the City has no authority to retroactively require a solar collector to be roof mounted. Neighboring City's Regulations Council requested that staff determine what the approval process is and regulations for solar collectors in neighboring communities. Staff contacted Paso Robles and the City of San Luis Obispo to determine their standards. 78 ITEM NUMBER: B - 2 DATE: 12/14/04 Paso Robles does not have any special setback requirements for solar collectors, but does require design review of all accessory structures. The City of San_Luis Obispo does not have any special setback requirements or design review requirements for solar collectors in residential districts. Options to Prevent this in Future The City of Atascadero's regulations for accessory structures are fairly permissive and reflect the City's large lot, agricultural character. Consequently, accessory structures can be fairly large up to 50% of the floor area of the primary unit. In addition, accessory structures are permitted to be as tall as the primary unit. The City has no appearance review requirements for accessory structures. Earlier this year, the accessory structure code was amended to required Minor Conditional Use permits for accessory structures larger than 50% of the floor area of the primary unit and for three of more accessory structures per lot. The primary impactofthe solar collector on the neighbor appears to be blocked views and the structure's appearance. The remedy to minimize this issue in the future would be to require appearance review of accessory structures and provide neighborhood notification. The administrative use permit process could be amended to require all accessory structures to have a noticed hearing and be subject to appearance and site review. This change would add significantly to planning staff workloads and significantly slow down the permitting process for all accessory structures. For the calendar year to date the City has received building permit applications for 115 accessory structures. Alternatively, the City could limit the hearing requirement to solar collectors or structures within a certain distance of property lines, or structures of . certain heights. The City has received applications for eight (8) solar collector systems. If the City were to have a special approval process for solar collectors it would have to be carefully constructed not to violate State protections. ATTACHMENTS 1. City Letter to Mr. Broder 9/14/04 2. Dennis Broder's 10/26/04 Document (submitted to City Council) 3. Gary Brom 11/15/04 Letter to City of Atascadero 4. City Letter to Mr. Brom 11/07/04 5. Zoning Ordinance 79 , Attachment 1 KA F- .roc CITY OF ATASCADERO 1918 ® :.19. H. \ � COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT September 14,2004 Dennis Broader, 4455 Tranquilla Avenue ` — Atascadero, CA 93422 RE: Solar energy system at 4515 Rosita Avenue Dear Mr. Broader: Staff has investigated the issues you have raised in regard to the solar energy system that was installed on the neighboring lot at 4515 Rosita Avenue. It is staff's understanding that you have questions regarding the height, setback,noise and glare related to the structure. Staff has prepared the following response to help clarify the regulations that apply to the structure. The original ermit applie anon was received an September 26, 2003 and was plan checked twice by staff. The permit was issued on November 3, 2003. The project was completed and finaled on April 14,2004. During the plan check process staff reviewed the permit for compliance with'City regulations and State laws. The City of Atascadero does not have any discretionary staff review process such as Appearance Review, Conditional Use Permit or environmental CEQA review for accessory structures. The City of Atascadero's Municipal Code(AMC)provides special exceptions for the height(AMC 9-4.113(b)(4)(ix)) and setback of solar collectors (AMC 9-4.110(c)). In addition, California State Law section 65850.5(a)prohibits a City from enacting"an ordinance that has the effect of prohibiting or of unreasonably restricting the use of solar energy systems..." As such, staff review of the building.permit was legally limited to checking for compliance with height and setback requirements. Setback The minimum side yard setback for structures in the LSF-X zoning district is 5-feet(AMC 9- 4.107). Setbacks are modified by AMC 9-4.110(c)which allows that"solar collectors may project into a required setback.only as allowed by the Uniform.Building Code." The minimum setback allowed by the Uniform Building Code in this district is 3-feet. The permit drawings indicate.that the solar array never swings closer than 5.75 feet to the property line. Therefore,the project is consistent with the City's setback regulations. • Fi1e:\\cityha111rdv1pmrM-CDD Correspondence\4515 Rosita BLD 2003-3148.pemft summary Itc9-10-04.w Woc Print Dale:09/14/049:41 AM 6905 EL CAMINO REAL,SUITE 6- ATASCADERO,CA 93422 (805)461-5000 FAX 461-7612 80 CITY OF ATASCADERO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT.DEPARTMENT September 14,2004 Page 2 of 3 Height The maximum height for structures in the LSF-X zoning district is 30-feet(AMC 9-4.113). Heights are modified by AMC 9-4.113(b)(4)(ix) which allows"solar collectors not more than five feet above the height limit specified in subsection(a) [30 feet] of this section." Therefore the maximum allowable height for a solar collector in 35-feet. The permit drawings indicate that the maximum height of the solar array's movement is 17.5 feet in height. Therefore, the,project is consistent with the City's height regulations. You have raised the issue that the maximum height of the structure should be limited to 12-feet based on AMC 9-4..107(a)(3). This section applies only to structures located within the required 5-foot setback. Since the solar array is located beyond the 5-foot side setback the 30-foot height limit.applies. • File:4515 Rosita BLD 2003-3148.perm¢summary ftr.9-10.04.w f Punt Date:09/14/049:09 AM 81 rM — CITY OF ATASCADERO • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT September 14,2004 Page 3 of 3 Glare The issue of the solar array creating glare on to your property has also been raised. The City of Atascadero only regulates glare related to electrical lighting(AMC 9-4.137) and has no glare or reflectivity regulations related to structures. Since the construction and orientation of the solar array is necessary for the system to work, it is likely that the State law would preempt the City from regulating this issue. Staff visited the site at noon and 5:00 pm on September 9, 2004 to investigate the glare issue further. At noon the array was oriented southeast away from your property and was casting shadows toward your property. At 5:00 pm the array had swung to the east facing your property,however there was no glare or light flares illuminating your property. Noise The maximum noise levels allowed within the City limits are regulated by AMC Title 9 Chapter 14. The noise levels are measured in decibels with different standards during the day than at night. Since the solar array operates during the day it is subject to the following regulations: Daytime(7 am to 9 pm)Maximum dB 70, Hourly Equivalent Sound Level (Leq, dB) 50. During staff's visit to the site it was noted that the solar array periodically moves to track the sun: Staff stood at the property line on Rosita Avenue with direct line of sight to the array and noted the sound of the motor was a barely audible"whir sound" and lasted approximate one to two seconds. It appeared that the array moves every two to three minutes. It does not appear that the periodic movement of the array violates the City noise ordinance. Please contact me at 461-5000, if I can be of assistance, or if you have questions regarding this letter. Sincerely;, Warren M. Frace Community Development Director cc: W.McKinney M.Torgerson T.Gibson S.McHarris • File:4515 Roma BLD 2003-3148.permit summary ttc9-10-04.wmt Print Date:09/14/049:10 AM 82 Attachment 2 � t /� Nth. ' ° ®4 CITY OF 11sis � 19-79 TA►��.1� ,�tcv COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT September 14, 2004 Dennis Broader 4455 Tranquilla Avenue Atascadero, CA 93,422 RE: Solar Energy System at 4515 Rosita Avenue Dear Mr. Broader: Staff has investigated the issues you have raised in regard .to the solar energy system that was installed on the neighboring lot at 4515 Rosita Avenue. It is staff's understanding that you have questions regarding the height, setback, noise and glare related to the structure. Staff has prepared the following response to help clarify the regulations that apply to the structure. The Original-permit application was received on September 26, 2003, and was plan checked twice by staff. The permit was issued on November 3,2003. The project was completed and fmaled-on April 14, 2004. During the plan check process, staff reviewed the permit for compliance with Ci regulations P City gu and State laws. The City of Atascadero does not have any discretionary staff review process such as Appearance Review, Conditional Use Permit or environmental CEQA review for accessory structures. The City of Atascadero's Municipal Code (AMC) provides special exceptions for the height (AMC 9-4.113(b)(4)(ix)) and setback of solar collectors(AMC 9-4.110(c)). In addition; California State Law section 65850.5(a) prohibits a City from enacting "an ordinance that has the effect of prohibiting or of unreasonably restricting the use of solar energy systems..." As such, staff review of the building permit was legally limited to checking for compliance with height and setback requirements. Setback The minimum side-yard setback for structures in the LSF-X Zoning District is 5=feet.(AMC 9- 4 1-07) _-Setbaeks are modified by AMC 9-4.110(c)"which allows that "solar collectors may project into a required setback only as allowed by the Uniform Building Code." The minimum setback allowed by the Uniform Building Code in this district is 3-feet. The permit drawings indicate that the solar array never swings closer than 5.75-feet to the property line. Therefore,the project is consistent with the City's setback regulations. I FIIe:UCItyha111eov1pmnlb CDD Correspondencet4515 RUSKS BLD 20D3-3148.WrIft Summary IIc9.10.04.ventdoc SII Print Data:09114/041:05 PM 6905 EL CAMINO REAL,SUITE 6- ATASCADERO,CA 93422 (805)461-5000 FAX 461-7612 83 CITY OF ATASCADERO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT September 14,2004 Page 2 of 3 Height The maximum height for structures in the LSF-X Zoning District is 30-feet (AMC 9-4.113). Heights are modified by AMC 9-4.113(b)(4)(ix) which allows "solar collectors not more than five feet above the height limit specified in subsection (a) [30 feet) of this section." Therefore, the maximum allowable height for a solar collector is 35-feet. The permit drawings indicate that the maximum height of the solar array's movement is 17.5-feet in height. Therefore, the project is Q consistent with the City's height regulations. You have raised the issue that the maximum height �r of the structure should be limited to 12-feet based on AMC 9-4.107(a)(3). This section applies only to structures located within the required 5-foot setback. Since the solar array is located beyond the 5-foot side setback,the 30-foot height limit applies. e 44Y*v'.s4 YC' r 27f'. r � T-1 File:4515 Rosita BLD 2003-3148.Penh summery 11r.9.10-04mint Print Date:091141041:05 PM 84 ii CITY OF ATASCADERO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT September 14,2004 Page 3 of 3 Glare The issue of the solar array creating glare onto your property has also been raised. The City of Atascadero only regulates glare related to electrical lighting (AMC 9-4.137)and has no glare or reflectivity regulations related to structures. Since the construction and orientation of the solar array is necessary for the system to work, it is likely that the State law would preempt the City from regulating this issue. Staff visited the site at noon and 5:00 pan. on September 9, 2004 to investigate the glare issue further." At noon, the array was oriented southeast away from your property and was casting shadows toward your property. At 5:00 p.m.,the array had swung to the east facing your property,however there was no glare or light flares illuminating your property. Noise The maximum noise levels allowed within the City limits are regulated by AMC Title 9 Chapter 14. The noise levels are measured in decibels with different standards during the day than at night. Since the solar array operates during the day, it is subject to the following regulations: Daytime (7 a.m. to 9 p.m.) Maximum dB 70, Hourly Equivalent Sound Level (Leq, dB) 50. During staff's visit to the site, it was noted that the solar array periodically moves to track the sun. Staff stood at the property line on"Rosita Avenue with direct line of sight to the array and noted the sound of the motor was a barely audible"whir sound" and lasted approximate one to two seconds. It appeared that the array moves every two to three minutes. It does not appear that the periodic movement of the array violates the City's Noise Ordinance. Please contact me at 461-5000, Ext. 3402 if I can be of assistance, or if you have questions regarding this letter. Sincerely Warren M. Frace Community Development Director cc: W.McKinney M.Torgerson T.Gibson S.McHarris I File:4515 Rosita BLD 20033148,Permit summaryitr.9-10-04.wmf Print Date:091141041:05 PM 85 9-4.111 9-4.112 Measurement of height. street to the rear face of the proposed building, up 9-4.113 Height limitations. to ten (10) feet may be added to the rear building (Ord. 68 § 9-4.111, 1983) face, which is to be excluded from the height mea- surement(Section 94.112). 94.112 Measurement of height. (4) Uninhabited Structures. The height limits The height of a building or structure is to be specified in subsection (a) of this section do not measured as the vertical distance from the highest apply to the following structures (measurement of point of the structure to the average of the highest height is to be from the ground, as set forth in Sec- and lowest points where the exterior walls touch the tion 94.112): `finish grade!'(Ord 68 § 9-4.112, 1983) (i) Radio and television receiving antennas of the type customarily used for home radio and televi- 9-4.113 Height limitations. Sion receivers,when fifty(50)feet or less in height. The maximum height for new structures is as (u) Transmitting antennas used by licensed follows: amateur(ham) radio operators when fifty (50) feet ,/a) Limitation by Zone. or less in height. (iii)Flagpoles fifty (50) feet or less in height. Zone' Maximum Height (iv) Barns, grain elevators, silos, water tanks, windmills, wind generators and all other similar A, RS, RSF, LSF 30 feet structures not containing residential uses and located CN,CP, CR, CS, CT 35 feet in the A, RS, CR, CS, CPK, IP and I Zones. CPK, g', I 45 feet (v) Chimneys no more than one hundred(100) LS, L, P 35 feet feet in height located in the CPK, IP and I Zones RMF 30 feet(not to exceed and all other chimneys and roof vents extending no two stories) more than two(2)feet above the height limit speci- fied in subsection (a) of this section. (b) Exceptions to Height Limitations. (vi) Industrial towers, nonportable equipment (1) Planning Commission Waiver. The height and other uninhabited structures no more than sixty limitations of this section may be modified through (60) feet in height located in the CPK, IP and I conditional use permit approval,provided the Pian- Zones. ning Commission first finds the project will not (vii) All portable construction equipment. result in substantial detrimental effects.on the enjoy- (viii)Public utility poles and structures for pro- ment and use of adjoining properties and that the viding electrical and communications services. modified height will not exceed the 'lifesaving Ox) Solar collectors not more than five(5)feet equipment capabilities of the Fire Department. above the height limit specified in subsection (a) of (2) Height Adjustment. The height limitations this section. specified by subsection (a) of this section may be (x) Satellite receiving and similar communica- adjusted (Section 9-1.112) for a single-family resi- tion dishes and devices in commercial and industrial dential building to allow additional height, to a zones, when no more than ten (10) feet above the maximum of forty (40) feet, provided that the re- maximum height in the zone. (Ord. 68 § 94.113, ide,-Tear and interivrsetbach-are ffai%s—de - 1-983) one foot in width for each foot of height over thirty (30) feet. 94.114 Parking and Loading. (3) Downhill Lot. Where the average front-to- Parking and loading standards are intended to: back slope of a lot is greater than one foot of fall in minimize street congestion and traffic hazards;pro- seven (7)feet of distance from the centerline of the vide safe and convenient access to businesses,pub- 401 86 Title 9 PLANNING AND ZONING Chapter 4 GENERAL SITE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 9-4.113 Height limitations. The maximum height for new structures is as follows: (a) Limitation by Zone. Zone Imaximurn Height A, RS, RSF, LSF 30 feet 77-1 CN, CP, CR, CS, [35 feet CT CPK, IP, I —�45 feet LS, L, P 1135 feet RMF 30 feet(not to exceed two stories) (b) Exceptions to Height Limitations. (1) Planning Commission Waiver.The height limitations of this section may be modified through conditional use.permit approval, provided the Planning Commission first finds the project will not result in substantial detrimental effects on the enjoyment and use of adjoining properties and that the modified height will not exceed the lifesaving equipment capabilities of the Fire Department. (2) Height Adjustment. The height limitations specified by subsection(a)of this section may be adjusted (Section 9-1.112)for a single-family residential building to allow additional height, to a maximum,of forty (40)feet, provided that the required side,rear and interior setbacks are increased one foot in width for each foot of height over thirty(30) feet. (3) Downhill Lot.Where the average front-to-back slope of a lot is greater than one foot of fall in seven (7)feet of distance from the centerline of the street to the rear face of the proposed building, up to ten (10) feet may be added to the rear building face, which is to be excluded from the height measurement (Section 9-4.112). (4) Uninhabited Structures.The height limits specified in subsection (a)of this section do not apply to the following structures(measurement of height is to be from the ground, as set forth in Section 9- 4.112): (i) Radio.and television receiving antennas of the type customarily used for home radio and television receivers, when fifty(50)feet or less in height. (ii) Transmitting antennas used by licensed amateur(ham)radio operators when fifty (50)feet or less in height. (iii) Flagpoles fifty (50)feet or less in height. (iv) Barns, grain elevators, silos, water tanks, windmills,wind generators and all other similar structures not containing residential uses and located in the A, RS, CR, CS, CPK, IP and I Zones. (v) Chimneys no more than one hundred (100)feet in height located in the CPK, IP and I Zones and all other chimneys and roof vents extending no more than two(2)feet above the height limit specified in subsection(a)of this section: (vi) industrial towers,nonportable equipment and other uninhabited structures no more than sixty (60) feet in height located in the CPK, IP and I Zones. (vii)All portable construction equipment. (viii) Public utility poles and structures for providing electrical and communications services. (ix) Solar collectors not more than five (5)feet above the height limit specified in subsection (a)of this section. (x) Satellite receiving and similar communication dishes and devices in commercial and industrial zones,when no more than ten(10)feet above the maximum height in the zone.(Ord. 68§ 9-4.113, 1983) http://ordlink.com/codes/ataseadero/ DATA/T£TLE09/Chapter_4_GENERAL_SITE DES... 9/7/2004 87 Side setbacks. (iv) Side setbacks opposite the zero setback property line are not less than twice the minimum required by this section. (b) CN,CP, CR, CS,CT,CPK,IP, i and P Zones. No side setbacks are required. Ground floor residential uses are subject to the setback requirements of subsection (a) of this section. (c) L and LS Zones.A minimum five (5)foot side setback is required. (Ord. 303 § 2 (Exh. C), 1996; Ord. 68§ 9-4.107, 1983) 88 3/7.1/00 4:38 PN I, City of Atascadero }9ss 107 Community Development Department PUBLIC INFORMATION - BUILDING SERVICES Community Development Department 6500 Paima Avenue Room 104 Atmadero,CA 93422 (805)461-5035 fax(805)461.5036 ACCESSORY (GARAGES-BARNS-SHEDS-STORAGE BUILDINGS) SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST SEISMIC ZONE 4 CLIMATE ZONE 4 -WIND ZONES 70 M.P.H -EXPOSURE ZONE"B"OR"C" ZONING ORDINANCE-TREEORDINANCE-ATASCADERO MUNICIPAL CODE-2001 C.B.C.-2000 C.E.C.-2001 C.F.C. ENGINEERING STANDARDS-CALIFORNIA STATE ENERGY COMPLIANCE,(TITLE 24) NOTE: All items listed below shall be required at the time of permit submittal. Italicized items maybe submitted at the time of permit issuance. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted at the front counter. ATTENTION: PRIOR TO PERMIT SUBMITTAL, THE APPLICANT OR AGENT SHALL BE REQUIRED TO SETUP AN APPOINTMENT WITH A CITY PLANNER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF PERMIT INTAKE. PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT THIS IS NOT A PLAN CHECK BUT REVIEW TO MAKE SURE ALL THE REQUIRED DRAWINGS/DOCUMENTATION IS COMPLETE. ALSO AT THIS) TIME, IT WILL BE DETERMINED AS TO WHETHER OR NOT A.PRECISE PLAN, LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT OR IF THE PROJECT ITSELF MAY NOT BE.ALLOWED ACCORDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE. ACCESSORY BUILDINGS: ZONING ORDINANCE 9-6.106(d)(2) FLOOR AREA: AN ACCESSORY STRUCTURE(DETACHED)IS NOT TO OCCUPY AN AREA GREATER THAN 50 PERCENT OF THE FLOOR AREA OF THE PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE. ATTACHED GARAGES: 1997 U.B.C. CHAPTER 3, SECTION 302.4, (EXCEPTION (3)) A ONE HOUR OCCUPANCY SEPARATION IS REQUIRED BETWEEN GARAGE AND SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE. THE SEPARATION MAY BE LIMITED TO THE INSTALLATIONS OF MATERIALS APPROV ED FOR ONE-HOUR FIRE-RESISTIVE CONSTRUCTION ON THE GARAGE SIDE (1.E. 5/8 DRYWALL)AND A SELF- CLOSING, TIGHT-FITTING SOLID-WOOD DOOR 1 3/8" IN THICKNESS. DETACHED ACCESSORY STRUCTURES: 1997 U.B.C. CHAPTER 1,SECTION 106.2 (WORK EXEMPT FROM PERMIT) ONE-STORY DETACHED ACCESSORY BUILDINGS USED AS TOOL AND STORAGE SHEDS, PLAYHOUSES, AND SIMILAR USES, PROVIDED THE FLOOR AREA DOES NOT EXCEED 120 SQUARE FEET. (NOTE: ANY ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL OR PLUMBING TO BE INSTALLED SHALL REQUIRE A PERMIT) ♦ Complete Application: a. If the permit is being pulled as an"OWNER-BUILDER",the"OWNER-BUILDER DECLARATION" shall be checked off and signed by the owner only unless a notarized letter of authorization is received listing persons eligible to sign in their behalf. b. If the permit is being pulled listing'a"GENERAL CONTRACTOR",the contractor shall complete and sign the appropriate areas. ♦ Permit Fee Deposit: $23.50 (SEE REVERSE SIDE) DISCLAIMER INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE 89 rzwo:3+-z-&v; E Page I ort ACCESSORY STRUCTURE CHKJST2.DOC I in, ACCESSORY BUILDINGS STANDARDS 1979 hey, \�. CA"D � Residential Accessory Buildings (From Section 9-6.106, Atascadero Zoning Ordinance) Construction of a detached accessory building shall not be commenced until construction of the main building has progressed to completion of its foundation. Limits on Use: An accessory structure may constructed or used as a .workshop or studio in any residential zone solely for non commercial hobbies or amusements; for maintenance of the principal structure or yards; for artistic endeavors such as painting;.photography or sculpture; maintenance or mechanical work on vehicles owned or operated by the occupants; for an approved home - occupation; or for other similar purposes. Accessory structures are not to occupy an area greater than So percent of the floor area of the principal structure. Workshops or Studios: Any accessory structure intended solely or primarily for engaging in - artwork, crafts, light hand manufacturing, mechanical work, etc. Accessory Greenhouse: An accessory greenhouse may occupy up to 500 square feet per dwelling unit or 10% of the site, whichever is smaller. Development Standards for Accessory Buildings Setbacks (From Section 9-4.103, Atascadero Zoning Ordinance) Front Setbacks: twenty-five (25) feet Side setbacks: A side yard may be used for an accessory building no greater than 12 feet in height, provided that it is not used for human habitation or the keeping of animals and is either; a. Located no closer than three feet to any property line b. Located on the rear half of the lot c. Established on the property line as-a common wall structure (see common wall construction standards (9-4.107 (a-4)), provided that all Uniform Building Code requirements are satisfied for a property line wall. Rear Setbacks: A rear yard may be used for an accessory building no greater than 12:.feet in height, provided that it is not used for lhuman habitation or the keeping of animals and is no closer than 3 feet to a side or rear property line or alley. Agricultural Accessory Buildings (From section 9-6.109, Atascadero Zoning Ordinance) An agricultural accessory building is an uninhabited structure, designed and built to store farming animals, implements, supplies or products not to be used by the public. Examples include barns, stables, lofts, coops, and sheds. Minimum Site Area. Agricultural accessory buildings are allowed in the A , RS, and RSF zones. An agriculture accessory building is not to be established on a iot with an area less than one acre. Front Setback: Fifty (50) feet.* Side and Rear Setbacks: Twenty-five (25) feet.* Floor: No concrete slab or other similar flooring is allowed for agricultural accessory buildings. Height: 30 g feet. * See animal density regulations for special requirements applied to animals. 90 .., Page l of l Title 9.PLANNING AND ZONING Chapter 4.GENERAL.SITE_DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 9-4.101 Purpose. This chapter establishes standards for use in the design and development of land uses and buildings within the City.The purpose of these standards is to support, through careful site evaluation and design, the establishment of land uses in a manner that protects the public health, safety and welfare and supports the achievement of the objectives of the General Plan. (Ord. 68§ 9-4.101, 1983) 91 http://ordlink.com/codes/ataseadero/ DATA/TITLE09/Chapter_4_GENERAL SITE_DE.../9_4_101_Purpose_.htm 9/8/04 Title 9 PLANNING AND ZONING Chapter 4 GENERAL SITE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 9-4.108 Rear setbacks. The rear setback is measured at right angles to the rear property line to form a setback line parallel to the rear property line. (a)A, RS, RSF, LSF, and RMF Zones and Permitted Ground Floor Residential Uses in Commercial and Industrial Zones.All residential uses except for second story dwellings over commercial and industrial uses shall have a minimum rear setback of ten (10)feet, except as follows: (1)Accessory Buildings. A rear setback except for the portion of the rear yard adjacent to the street of a corner lot adjacent to a key lot, may be used for an accessory building no greater than twelve(12)feet in height, provided the accessory building is not used for human habitation or the keeping of animals,and is closer than three feet to a side or rear property line or alley: (b)CN, CP, CR, CS, CT, CPK, IP and I Zones. No rear setback is required in commercial or industrial zones, except as follows: (1)Adjacent to an Alley. The rear setback shall be a minimum of five (5)feet,except where the alley provides vehicular access to the interior of the building, in which case the setback shall be ten (10)feet. (2)Adjacent to Residential Use Zone. Where the rear property line abuts a residential zone or use, no rear setback is required for buildings or portions of buildings whichdonot exceed twelve(12)feet in height within ten (10)feet of the rear property line. The rear setback shall.be a minimum of ten(10)feet for buildings or portions of buildings which exceed twelve(12)feet in height. (c)L, LS and P Zones.A minimum of ten (10)foot rear setback is required. 1983) (Ord:98§-1, 1985;Ord. 68 §9-4.108, I of 1 92 Title 9 PLANNING AND ZONING Chapter4 GENERAL .SITE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 9-4.107 Side setbacks. The side setback is measured at right angles to the side property line to form a setback line parallel to the side property line, which extends between the front and rear setback areas. The minimum side setback is to be as follows: (a) A, RS,RSF, LSF and RMF Zones and Residential Uses in Commercial and Industrial Zones. All residential uses except for second story dwellings over commercial and industrial uses shall have a minimum side setback of five (5) feet, except as follows: (1) Corner Lots.The side setback on the street side of a corner lot is to be a minimum of (10) feet. (2) A Corner Lot Adjacent to a Key Lot. A side setback equal to one-half the depth of the required front setback of the key lot shall be provided,except that: (i) Where the corner lot is less than fifty (50)feet in width, the setback is to be a minimum of ten (10) feet. (ii) Where an alley is between the corner lot and a key lot, the setback on the street side of the corner lot is to be five(5)feet. (3) Accessory Buildings. A side yard may be used for an accessory building no greater than C welve (12) feet in height, provided that it is not used for human habitation or the keeping of animals and is either: i) Located no closer than three (3) feet to any property line; or (ii) Located on the rear half of the lot; or (iii) Established on the property line as a common wall structure pursuant to subdivision (4) of this subsection, or as a zero lot line structure, provided that all applicable Uniform Building Code requirements are satisfied for a property linerwall. (4) Common Wall Development. Any two dwelling units, and/or their accessory garages, may be constructed on adjoining lots without setbacks between them provided that: (i)The setback has been eliminated through subdivision map or conditional use permit approval; and (ii)A common wall or party wall agreement, deed restriction or other enforceable restriction has been recorded; and (iii) The side setbacks opposite the common wall property line are not less than two times the minimum width required by this section; and (iv) Common wall construction is in compliance with the Uniform Building Code. (5) Zero Lot Line Development. A group of dwelling units on adjoining lots may be established so that all units abut one side property line, provided that: (i) The setback has been eliminated for an entire block through subdivision map or conditional use permit approval; and (ii) The modified setback requirements for the block are recorded as part of a land division map, deed restriction, or other enforceable restriction; and (iii) The side setback shall not be eliminated or reduced on the street side of a corner lot; and (iv) Side setbacks opposite the zerosetback property line.are:not less than twice-the minimum required by this section. (b) CN, CP, CR; CS, CT, CPK, IP,l and P Zones.No side setbacks are required. Ground floor residential uses are subject to the setback requirements of subsection (a) of this section. (c) L and LS Zones. A minimum five (5) foot side setback is required. (Ord. 303 § 2 (Exh. C); 1996; Ord. 68 §9-4.107, 1983) 93 http:/Jordlink.con-dBodes/atascadero/ DATA/TITLE09/Chapter_4_GENERAL_SIT.../9_4_107_Side_setbacks_.htm 9/8/04 1.arvG 1 W 1 Title 9-PLANNING AND ZONING _Chapter_4 GEN.ERAL_SITE._DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT.STANDARDS 9-4.110 Projections into required setbacks. The setback requirements of this title are modified as follows: (a) Uncovered Decks. When constructed higher than thirty(30) inches above the surrounding finish grade, a wood deck may extend into required setbacks as follows (decks less than thirty (30) inches high are exempt from these requirements -- see Section 9.4.104(c)): (1) Front Setback. A deck is not to be located therein. (2) Side Setback. As determined by the Uniform Building Code. (3) Rear Setback. A deck may occupy up to thirty(30%) percent of a required rear setback, but is to extend no closer than three (3)feet to the rear property line. (b) Fire Escapes. A ladder or stairs designed to be used exclusively as an upper floor fire escape may project into a required setback only as provided by the Uniform Building Code. (c) Roof and Wall Features. Cantilevered and projecting architectural features including chimneys, bay windows, balconies, cornices, eaves, rain gutter, signs (where allowed), display windows, and solar collectors may project into a required setback only as allowed by the Uniform Building Code. (d) Porches. (1) Front Porch. A covered front porch may project up to six (6) feet into a required front setback, provided that the floor level of the porch is to be no higher than the ground level of the building. An unenclosed front porch is not limited on its projection, provided it is one hundred (100) square feet or less in area. (2) Side Porch.A porch and/or outside stairway may be located in a required side setback provided the porch is not roofed or enclosed below the steps and does not extend into the side setback more than allowed by the Uniform Building Code_ (3) Rear Porch. A porch in the required rear setback is subject to the same limitations as a deck, pursuant to subsection (a)(3) of this section. (e) Flag Lots. Six(6)foot fences shall be allowed within the front yard setback area, but in no case shall a six (6)foot fence be allowed within an area connecting the required front yard setback areas for any adjoining lots. Trash enclosures may encroach into the front yard setback area but shall maintain a five (5)foot setback from adjoining property lines and shall not be located within the access strip. (Ord. 82 § 9-4.110, 1984; Ord. 68 § 9-4.110, 1983) http://ordlink.com/codes/atascadero/ DATA/TITLE09✓Chapter_4 GENER.../9_4_110_Projections_into_requi.htm 9/8/04 94 - ---a Page 1 of 2 Title.9_P,LANNING_AND ZONING Chapter 4 GENERAL SITE:DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 9-4.113 Height limitations. The maximum height for new structures is as follows: (a)Limitation by Zone. Zone Maximum Height A RS,.RSF, LSF 30 feet CN, CP, CR, CS, 35 feet CT CPK, I P, I 45 feet LS, L, P 135 feet RMF 30 feet(not to exceed two stories) (b) Exceptions to Height Limitations. (1) Planning Commission Waiver. The height limitations of this section may be modified through conditional use permit approval, provided the Planning Commission first finds the project willnot result in substantial detrimental effects on the enjoyment and use of adjoining properties and that the modified height will not exceed the lifesaving equipment capabilities of the Fire Department. (2) Height Adjustment. The height limitations specified by subsection (a) of this section may be adjusted (Section 9.1.112)for a single-family residential building to allow additional height, to a maximum of forty(40) feet, provided.that the required side, rear and interior_setbacks are increased one foot in width for each foot of height over thirty(30)feet. (3) Downhill Lot. Where the average front-to-back slope of a lot is greater than one foot of fall in seven (7) feet of distance from the centerline of the street to the rear face of the proposed building, up to ten (10) feet may be added to the rear building face, which is to be excluded from the height measurement (Section 9.4.112). (4) Uninhabited Structures. The height limits specified in subsection (a) of this section do not apply to the following structures (measurement of height is to be from the ground, as set forth in Section 9-4.112): (i) Radio and e evision receiving antennas of the type customarily used for home radio and television receivers, when fifty (50)feet or less in height. (ii) Transmitting antennas used by licensed amateur(ham) radio operators when fifty(50)feet or less in height. _-,(1).Flagpoles_fifty�,5D)Jeet_oxJess.in-height_ (iv) Barns,grain elevators, silos, water tanks, windmills, wind generators and all other similar structures not containing residential uses and located in the A, RS, CR, CS, CPK, IP and l Zones. (v) Chimneys no more than one hundred (100)feet in height located in the CPK, IP and I Zones and all other chimneys and roof vents extending no more than two (2)feet above the height limit specified in subsection (a) of this section. (vi) Industrial towers, nonportable equipment and other uninhabited structures no more than sixty(60) feet in height located in the CPK, IP and I Zones. (vii) All portable construction equipment. h I 95 http://ordlink.com/codes/ataseadero/—DATA/TITLE09/Chapter 4_GENERAL .../9_4_113_Height_limitations_.htm 9/8/04 - I aYJG G V I L (viii) Public utility poles and structures for providing electrical and communications services. (ix) Solar collectors not more than five (5) feet above the height limit specified in subsection (a) of this section. (x) Satellite receiving and similar communication dishes and devices in commercial and industrial zones, when no more than ten (10) feet above the maximum height in the zone. (Ord. 68 § 9-4.113, 1983) http_//ordlink.convcodes/atascadero/ DATA/TI TLE09/Cha ter 4 _ GENERAL .../9 4 113 Hei ht lim' 96 P _ _ _ _ _ rtations .htzn 9/8/04 - --- -- a Page l of"2 Title_9-PLANNING..AND ZONING Chapter 4:GENERAL SIT DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 9-4.128 Fencing and screening. Standards for fencing and screening are established by this section to protect certain uses from intrusion, to protect the public from uses that may be hazardous, and to increase compatibility between different land uses by visual screening. Fencing is the enclosure of an area by the materials identified in subsection (c) of this section. Screening is the enclosure of an area by a visual barrier, which may include solid fencing or other materials as specified in subsection (c) of this section, (a) Fencing and Screening: Where Required. Within the urban services line the uses and areas Fisted in this subsection shall be fenced and/or screened as indicated. Unless otherwise specified, fencing and screening are to be a minimum height of six(6)feet. Fencing and screening materials of a height greater than three (3)feet shall not be located within a required front setback or side setback adjacent to a street. (1) Mechanical Equipment. When Located outside of a building, support equipment including air conditioning and heating devices, but not including plumbing or exhaust vents, or chimneys, shall be screened to the height of the particular piece of equipment, as follows: (i) Roof-mounted Equipment. To be screened by architectural features from the view of abutting streets. (ii) Equipment at Grade. When located on the ground adjacent to a building, mechanical equipment shall be screened by landscaping, a solid wall or fencing from the view of the street or surrounding properties. This subsection does not apply to single-family residential uses. • (2) Outdoor Storage. To be screened on all sides es b y a wall or fencing. (3) Public Utility Substations. To be screened on all sides in a manner that will provide an effective visual barrier as well as the necessary safety clearances required by order of the California Public Utilities Commission. (4) Side and Rear Lot Lines. The side and rear property lines of all nonresidential uses are to be screened as follows i Adjacent t O o a Residential Use o 1 r Zone. A solid wall or fencing.shall be located on side and rear property lines of any nonresidential or nonagricultural use se abuttinga residential u zone. use or (5)Swimming Pools. Yard areas with private swimming pools are to be fenced to discourage unsupervised access and use by small children. Such fencing.is to be a minimum of four(4) feet high and equipped with a self-closing g and self-latching gate. Latching devices are to be located at a minimum height of four (4)feet. Such fencing maybe omitted where building walls abut the pool area,provided that the entire re eri meter of the pool area i s secured. (b) Exceptions to Fencing and Screening Requirements, (1) Buildings Abutting Property Lines. Required screening or fencing maybe omitted along any lot line where a building wall exists immediately abutting the lot line. (2) Location Adjustment. Where property fencing or screening is required, the location may be adjusted(see,Sectipn 9.1,1.i2_so_-t.he-fencing may-be-coast--ucted-a4-or--*it#in-t-he- etbac-k-44ne, provided the areas between the fence and the property lines are landscaped, or in rural areas, retained in their natural vegetative state. (3) Planning Commission Modification. Any of the requirements of this section may be waived or modified through conditional use permit approval,provided the Planning Commission first finds that specifically identified characteristics of the site or site vicinity would make required fencing or screening unnecessary or ineffective. (c) Standards for Fencing and Screening Materials. All fencing and screening shall be constructed as follows: (1) Permit to Exceed Height. Conditional use permit approval is required where fencing is 97 http://ordlink.com/codes/atasr-adero/ DATA/TITLE09/Cbapter_4_GENE.../9_4_128 Fencing_and_screening_.htm 9/8/04 IaSGG Ul L proposed to be greater than six (6) feet in height. (2) Location. Fencing shall not be located within any required front setback except where such fencing is three (3)feet or less in height. (3) Height. Walls and fences are not to be higher than six (6) feet, except fences located at or within required setback lines may be up to twelve (12)feet in.height. Gateposts and other superstructures over site entrances and exits may be up to twelve(12)feet in height. (4) Screening Materials Substitution. Where screening is required to be a solid wall or fence, the following materials may be substituted through adjustment(see Section 9.1.112), except where screening is required adjacent to a residential use or zone, (i) Landscape Screen. Screening plant materials may be substituted for a wall or fence, where: (A) Proposed plant materials are certified in writing by a registered landscape architect as having the capability of achieving sixty (60) percent of total view blockage within eighteen (18) months of planting, and one hundred (100) percent of total view blockage within thirty-six (36) months of planting; and (B) The applicant agrees in writing to install solid fencing after the expiration of thirty-six(36) months, in the event that the landscaping has not totally blocked the view of areas required to be screened. (ii) Berms..A landscaped berm may be substituted for a wall or fence provided that the combination of berm and landscaping is no Fess than the required height of the fence or wail, and that the berm is constructed with a maximum slope of 3:1, with side slopes designed and planted to prevent erosion, and with a rounded surface a minimum of two(2) feet in width at the highest point of the berm, extending the length of the berm. The berm shall be planted with shrubs, lawn or groundcover. (iii) Slatted Chain-link fencing. Chain-link fencing with redwood slats may be substituted for a solid wall or fence in commercial and industrial zones except where screening fencing is required adjacent to residential uses and zones. (Ord. 68 §9-4.128,'1983) http://ordlink.com/codes/atascadero/ DATA/TITLE09/Chapter_4_GENE.../9_4_128_Fencing_and_screening_.htm 9/8/04 98 1-r.v. . UIPVZ,auu iiuWuL. Page I of I Title_9 PLANNING AND ZONING Chapter_14_NOISE 9-14.01 Purpose and intent. (a) This chapter establishes standards for acceptable exterior and interior noise levels and describes how noise is to be measured. These standards are intended to protect persons from excessive noise levels, which are detrimental to the public health, welfare and safety and contrary to the public interest because they can: (1) Interfere with sleep, communication, relaxation, and the full enLo mentof one's property; (2) Contribute to hearing impairment and a wide range o adverse physiol_o stress conditions; and (3) Adversely affect the value of real property. (b) Itis the intent of this chapter to protect persons from excessive levels of noise within or near various residential development and other specified noise-sensitive land uses. (Ord. 245 § 2, (Exh. A) 1992) ------------- 99 http://ordlink.com/codes/atascadero/_DATA/TITLE09/Chapter_l4_NOISE/`9_14_0l_Purpose_and_intent .html 9/8/04 Title 9. PLANNING AND ZONING Chapter 14_N_01-SE 9-14.05 Exterior noise level standards. (a) It is unlawful for any person at any location within the incorporated area of the City to create any noise, or to allow the creation of any noise, on property owned, leased, occupied or otherwise controlled by such person which causes the exterior noise level when measured at any affected single or multiple-family residence, school, hospital, church or public library situated in the City to exceed the noise level standards as set forth in the following table: EXTERIOR NOISE LEVEL STANDARDS DAYTIME NIGHTTIME (7 a.m. to (9 p.m. to 9 p.m.) 7 a.m.) Hourly 50 45 Equivalent Sound Level (Leq, dB) Maximum, 70 165. dB (b) In the event the measured ambient noise level exceeds the applicable noise level standard in any category above, the applicable standard shall be adjusted so as to equal the ambient noise level. (c) Each of the noise level standards specified above shall be reduced by five (5) dB for simple tone noises, noises consisting primarily of speech or music, or for recurring impulsive noises. . (d) If the intruding noise source is continuous and cannot reasonably be discontinued or stopped for a time period whereby the ambient noise level can be measured, the noise level measured while the source is in operation shall be compared directly to the noise level standards.(Ord. 245 § 2, (Exh. A) 1992) http://ordlink.com/codes/ataseadero/ DATA/TITLE09/Chapter_14_NOISE/9 14_05_Exterior noise_level_s.html 9/8/Cl 00 Page 1 of l Title-9 PLANNING,AND ZONING Chapter 14 NOISE 9-14.06 Interior noise level standards. (a) It is unlawful for any person at any location within the incorporated area of the City to operate or cause to be operated within a dwelling unit(intended for permanent human habitation) a source of noise or allow the creation of any noise which causes the noise level when measured inside a receiving dwelling unit situated in the incorporated area to exceed the noise level standards set forth in the following table: INTERIOR:NOISE LEVEL STANDARDS DAYTIME NIGHTTIME (7 a.m. to (9 p.m. to 9 p.m.) 7 a.m.) Hourly 40 35 Equivalent Sound Level (Leq, dB) Maximum 60 55 Level (b) In the event the measured ambient noise level exceeds the applicable noise level PP standard in any category above, the applicable standard shall be adjusted so as to equal the ambient noise level. The ambient noise level includes the noise generated by the receiving dwelling unit. (c) Each of the noise level standards specified above shall be reduced by five(5) dB for simple tone noises, noises consisting primarily of speech or music, or for recurring impulsive noises. (d) If the intruding noise source is continuous and cannot reasonably be discontinued or stopped for a time period whereby the ambient noise level can be measured, the noise level measured while the source is in operation shall be compared directly to the noise level standards. (Ord. 245 § 2, (Exh. A) 1992) 101 http://ordlink.com/codes/ataseadero/ DATA/TITLE09/Chapter_14_NOISE/9_14_06_Interior noise_level_s.html 9/8/04 Title 9 PLANNING AND_ZONING Chapter_14 NOISE 9-14.04 Noise measurement criteria. (a) Any noise measurement made pursuant to the provisions of this ordinance shall he made with a sound level meter using the A-weighted network(scale) at slow meter response. Fast meter response shall be used for impulsive type sounds. Calibration of the measurement equipment utilizing an acoustical calibrator shall be performed immediately prior to recording any noise data. (b) Exterior Noise Levels. Exterior noise levels shall be measured at the property line of the affected noise-sensitive land use. Where practical, the microphone shall be positioned three (3) to five(5) feet above the ground and away from reflective surfaces. (c) Interior Noise Levels. The interior noise levels shall be measured within the affected dwelling unit, at points at least four(4)feet from the wall, ceiling or floor.nearest the noise source, with windows in the normal seasonal configuration. The reported interior noise level shall he determined by taking the arithmetic average of the readings taken at the various microphone locations. (Ord. 245 § 2, (Exh. A) 1992) s http://ordlink.com/codes/atascadero/ DATA/TITLE09/Chapter_14_NOISE/9_14_04_Noise_measurement crit.html 9/8/0102 6 � I I L N � 103 f x. z, OEM , It r a: 7. 'k + I ' m n. �?" •mss - �.� � , tir ` 7 =x *' •2 P e -, �y vN {h �: a y` e� may.. ,�» TIT t se r 4 •s,, a Via' r �s i �'I .m ��..� �', .. ��•f �`F �"� j -1 I � I iii e� u � t. _ "•..1�C tai r�� Q:�' ��L Y. i 4 J - �r _ �4 § ._ �� f"> � �fry 3� - ,� �♦ ♦ 1 .tl� r 1 ��d ` �� I i 7 1 1 1 1 1 21116 m� x r� i "I t ` � ` a � �YC ')Y fyey l'F7�5 r o� 1jo _ a Iu► j 1 F, , l fl I, p � €� s- � r t� _Jt*al G'f f 4 IJ �� Lg 7k 73 e� ( a p ` 4 U u ' A -.0 > •� pCY 1 M-w ' 1{[yr t�t wt.r�fij t 107 ri Attachment 3 mp- . [115101! - 4515 Rosita Ave ERECEIN� G-rYAtascadero,CA 93422November 7 2004 5 2004 F I , y4 vWarren Frace !" DEVEL®PNOff City of Atascadero 6500 Palma Avenue Atascadero, CA 93422 Dear Warren, This letter is in response to and to recap our conversations during one phone call and two site visits regarding our photovoltaic array("solar panel")installation.As I understand, our neighbor to the west,Dennis Broders,has raised concerns regarding the permitted installation of said solar installation. The four concerns are side setback encroachment, project height, "glare", and noise. I will address each concern below. 1) Encroachment. As I've explained to you,the fence line between both properties is not on the property line. The family we bought this property from,"Poletti"made arrangements with Mr. Broders to skew the fence line along that entire side, allowing Mr. Broders a three foot easement at the rear corner, and allowing Poletti a three foot easement on the front of the same property line. Between these two parties,a new fence was erected. While we were in escrow to purchase the property(COE 7/98)it was brought to our attention that the above easement was never recorded. When I informed Mr. Broders of this,he was amazed, and angry, stating that Poletti had agreed to accomplish the recording of the easement. I • made the recordation of this easement a condition of our escrow close, and thus secured the easement for Mr. Broders. We have Mr.Broders signature on the recorded easement. Given that Mr. Broders participated in the building of the new fence and participated in the recording of the easement by us in 1998,1 find it telling of his motivations when he alleges to you that he doesn't quite know of the property line,and location of the easement. Of course, during our escrow, a survey was done, and the property corners were verified. In March 2003 we commenced on a large remodel of the existing home, and again paid to have the property corners marked, for all of the typical engineering, permitting and construction processes. The property corner marker at the west, rear is in place,as you have observed, "in Mr. Broders backyard"three feet inside the existing fence;thus is the reference point for any encroachment claim. As you and your assistant measured,by line of sight the project at its maximum rotation is approximately fifty eight inches from the property line. At the design point of the solar array project, I endeavored to maintain the five foot encroachment limit. Remedy: As I've shown you,the individual solar panel components are moveable; being"u-bolted"to the framework and as such can be moved away from the property line,towards my side, if this becomes a"matter of inches". 108 2) Project height and Glare. We chose the west side of our property for the solar project for several reasons. A) Our parcel is in a small ravine. The west side of the property is a small bank,upwards to Mr. Broders property.The east side has a long, steep bank populated with mature Oak trees. These trees would shade the solar array reducing it output. B) The solar array obviously needs be connected to the electrical main panel. That connection,the main panel, is on the southwest portion of the house, and thus also lends itself to a western location for the solar array. Additionally,as you may be aware,the amount of electricity a conductor can carry is inversely proportional to it's length, so to have moved the array further out,would decrease power output and/or cause increased heat built up in the conductor, which is plain and simple, electrical loss. As this system is designed for `life-long' use; and the entire purpose is to conserve electricity,maximizing output and minimizing electrical losses is an important factor. Q As you have seen, our backyard has a large grass lawn, irrigated by 5 `zones' and 38 sprinkler heads. Were the solar array placed, say, in the middle of the yard,the trenching for electrical conduit to the array would cause the destruction of a large network of the lawn irrigation. Even if this had been accomplished, and regardless of project height,Mr.Broders property looks from above, directly into our backyard and as such, would have `full view' of,the array anywhere in our yard. D) Given these issues the design was made to place the array in a location with the best possible sunlight, and closest to the point of electrical connection with minimal disruption to a large lawn and irrigation. The project height is called out in our design and permit and it is within that parameter. E) As I've explained to you, I had a conversation with Mr.Broders in approximately March 2004 regarding these issues. I offered to extend my grape arbor adjacent to the fence line, vertically and train vining shrubs to it so as to give Mr. Broders a degree of`visual relief of the solar array. He accepted my offer and I've shown you the lumber to be used for the project as well as the landscaping shrubs installed for this purpose. At the time I planted the shrubs I purposefully informed Mr. Broders that"the plants were in the ground,on drip irrigation"and I would be finishing up the trellis type of structure. As the city will not permit this structure, it has been removed. Remedy: I have purchased a number of Italian Buckthorn, a rapidly growing small shrub/tree and will plant these on my property adjacent to the fence line as a hedgerow. They grow in the range of 10-15 feet and will obscure Mr. Broders view of the array as well asmitigate any issue of"glare". 109 i3) Noise. The `noise' Mr. Broders refers to is from a small low voltage electric motor which operates intermittently, on the order of less than one,to one second at a time,to keep the array vertically aligned to the point of maximum solar radiation. There have been times, during inclement weather; rain etc, where the system has operated on the order of ten to twenty seconds to move the array, but that is not the norm.Again,most telling is that for the duration of both of your site visits,the system did not move at all. And of course, as you've told me,you have heard the noise in question,from a vantage point of the front of the property, and it"didn't sound noisy". Remedy: I have had a small metal box fabricated and have purchased foam sound insulation with which to line the interior of the box. This box will be installed, encasing the electric motor. Additionally,the hedgerow we will plant will to some degree provide a barrier to sound as well. I appreciate your interest and assistance in resolving this issue. Best regar Gary B. Bonn 110 Attachment 4 R CITY OF ATA,,- am +1929 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT November 17,2004 F I L 'U Gary Brom 4515 Rosita Avenue Atascadero, CA 93422 RE: Setback of Solar Energy System at 4515 Rosita Avenue Dear Mr.Brom: I have received your letter regarding the installation of your solar energy system (solar array) at the above address. As you mention in your letter,your neighbor has raised four issues about the solar array regarding setback, height, glare and noise. Based on staff's site visit, there appears to be evidence that the setback of the solar array may swing closer to the property line than indicated on the approved construction plan. Setback In order to resolve the setback issue,the City is requiring that you submit a survey that would determine the exact setback between the property line and the array at its closest possible point. The survey must be done by a licensed professional. Based on the results of the survey the City will require the array to be in conformance with the plans or an approved revision. Height In order to resolve the height issue, the City is requiring that you submit a survey of the height of the solar array at its highest point. The survey must be done by a licensed professional. Based on the results of the survey the City will require revisions to the approved plans to be submitted. Noise In your letter, you state that you are planning on installing a "box" around the drive motor to muffle the sound. Staff would encourage that the muffler box be installed in a timely manner. As we have discussed, the City Council has requested that staff prepare a report on this permit. That report will be discussed at the City Council's December 14, 2004 meeting beginning at 7:00 p.m. at the Atascadero Lake Pavilion at 9315 Pismo Avenue. Staff strongly recommends that the surveys and the muffler installation be completed prior to the City Council meeting. Please contact me at 461-5000,Ext. 3402 if I can be of assistance, or if you have questions regarding this letter. Sincerely, Warren M.Frace, Community Development Director cc: W.McKinney,M.Torgerson,T.Gibson,S.McHarris File:\\cltyhall\c&ipmnt\-CDD Correspontlence41515 Rosea BLD 2003-3148.setback letter Bmm.11-16A4.wmf.doc Print Date:11/17/0412:08 PM 6905 EL CAMINO REAL,SUITE 6■ ATASCADERO,CA 93422 (805)461-5000 ■ FAX 461-7612 1 rneignt iimttations. Page 1 of 2 Title..9_PLAN_N I NG:AN D..ZGN ING Chapter..4_G.ENERAL_;at _DESIGN AND_D.EVELOPME.NT.STANDARDS 9-4.113 Height limitations, Attachment 5 The maximum height for new structures is as follows: Zp^}�rJC� dl�p,�•►aa (a)Limitation by Zone. Izo—ne— Maximum Height — I A, RS, RSF, LSF 30 feet CN, CP, CR, CS, 35 feet CT CPK, IP, 1 145.feet —� LS, L, P 35 feet RMF. 30 feet(not to exceed two stories) (b)Exceptions to Height Limitations. (1) Planning Commission Waiver. The height limitations of this section maybe modified through conditional use permit approval, provided the Planning Commission first finds the project will not result insubstantial detrimental effects on the enjoyment and use of adjoining properties and that the modified height will not exceed the lifesaving equipment capabilities of the Fire Department. (2)Height Adjustment. The height limitations specified by subsection (a)of this section may be adjusted (Section 9-1.112)for a single-family residential building to allow additional height, to a maximum of forty (40)feet, provided that the required side, rear and interior setbacks are increased one foot in width for each foot of height over thirty(30)feet. (3) Downhill Lot. Where the average front-to-back slope of a lot is greater than one foot of fall in seven (7)feet of distance from the centerline of the street to the rear face of the proposed building, up to ten (10)feet may be added to the rear building face,which is to be excluded.from the height measurement (Section 9-4.112). (4) Uninhabited Structures. The height limits specified in subsection (a)of this section do not apply to the following structures (measurement of height is to be from the ground, as set forth in Section 9- 4.112): (i) Radio and television receiving antennas of the type customarily used for home radio and television receivers, when fifty(50)feet or less in height. (ii)Transmitting antennas used by licensed amateur(ham) radio operators when fifty (50)feet or less in height. (iii)Flagpoles fifty (50)feet or less in height. (iv)Barns, grain elevators, silos, water tanks, windmills, wind generators and all other similar structures not containing residential uses and located in the A, RS, CR, CS, CPK, IF and IZones. (v)Chimneys no more than one hundred (100)feet in height located in the CPK, IP and I Zones and all other chimneys and roof vents extending no more than two (2)feet above the height limit specified in subsection (a) of this section. (vi) Industrial towers, nonportable equipment and other uninhabited structures no more than sixty (60) feet in height located in the CPK, IP and,I Zones. (vii)All portable construction equipment. (viii)Public utility poles and structures for providing electrical and communications services. (ix)Solar collectors not more than five (5)feet above the height limit specified in subsection (a)of this . 0-section. (x) Satellite receiving and similar communication dishes and devices in commercial and industrial zones, when no more than ten (10)feet above the maximum height in the zone. (Ord. 68 § 9-4.113, 1983) http://ordlink.com/codes/atascadero/_DATA/TITLE09/Chapter_4_GENERAL SITE DES._. 9/9/2004 112 9-4.110 Projections into required setbacks. Page 1 of 1 Remove highlighting_ Title_9 PL AN IN G.AND.ZONING Chapter 4,aENERAL_SITE DE; 1L AN©_DEVELC PMENT STANDARDS 9-4.110 Projections into required setbacks. The setback requirements of this title are modified as follows: (a) Uncovered Decks. When constructed higher than thirty(30) inches above the surrounding finish grade, a wood deck may extend into required setbacks as follows (decks less than thirty (30) inches high are exempt from these requirements see Section 9-4.104(c)): (1) Front Setback. A deck is not to be located therein. (2)Side Setback. As determined by the Uniform Building Code. (3) Rear Setback. A deck may occupy up to thirty(30%) percent of a required rear setback, but is to extend no closer than three (3)feet to the rear property.line. (b)Fire Escapes. A ladder or stairs designed to be used exclusively as an upper floor fire escape may project into a required setback only as provided by the Uniform Building Code. (c) Roof and Wall Features. Cantilevered and projecting architectural features including chimneys, bay windows,balconies, cornices, eaves, rain gutter, signs (where allowed), display windows, and solar collectors may project.into a required setback only as allowed by the Uniform Building Code marches. (1) Front Porch. A covered front porch may project up;to six(6)feet into a required front setback, provided that the floor level of the porch is to be no higher than the ground level of the building.An unenclosed front porch is not limited on its projection, provided it is one hundred (100)square feet or less in area. (2)Side Porch. A porch and/or outside stairway may be located in a required side setback provided the porch is not roofed or enclosed below the steps and does not extend into the side setback more than allowed by the Uniform Building Code. (3) Rear Porch. A porch in the required rear setback is subject to the same limitations as a deck, pursuant to subsection (a)(3)of this section. (e) Flag Lots. Six (6)foot fences shall be allowed within the front yard setback area,but in no case shall a six(6)foot fence be allowed within an area connecting the required front yard setback areas for any adjoining lots. Trash enclosures may encroach into the front yard setback area but shall maintain a five (5)foot setback from adjoining property fines and shall not be located within the access strip. (Ord.82 §9-4.110, 1984; Ord. 68 § 9-4.110,_1983) 113://ordlink.com/cgi-bin/hilite.pl/codes/ataseadero/_DATA/TITLE09/Chapter_4 GENE... 9/9/2004 fa 2004 rt ul x� x g and Plannin ■ Y. ZoningLaws ........... r Mat 4 1 5 } k ' t � 114 ! (e) The Legislature finds and declares that in order to encourage the legislative 65852.1 bodyof a city or county in regulating adult or sexually oriented businesses or The. similar businesses under this section,the legislative body may consider any in C harmful secondary effects such a business may have on adjacent cities and counties and its proximity to churches, schools, residents, and other businesses located in adjacent cities or counties. [Amended,Chapter 550,Statutes of 19991 . It is agen I 65850.5. Protection for solar energy'systems prov (a) The legislative body of any city or county shall not enact an ordinance that has and, the effect of prohibiting or of unreasonably restricting the use of solar energy unre, systems other than for the preservation or protection of the public health or whic safety. This prohibition shall be, applicable to charter cities _because the promotion of the use of nonfossil fuel sourcesofenergy, including solar energy and energy conservation measures,is a matter of statewide concern. 65852.: ' (b) This section shall not apply to ordinances that impose reasonable restrictions (a) on solar energy systems. However;it the policy of the state to promote and encourage the use of solar energy systems and to remove obstacles thereto. M Accordingly, reasonable restrictions on a solar energy system are those restrictions that do not significantly increase the cost of the system or significantly decrease its efficiency, or that allow for an alternative system of comparable cost and efficiency. OW (c) For the purposes of this section,"solar energy system" shall have the same meaning as set forth in Section 801.5 of the Civil Code. [Amended,Chapter 873,Statutes of 2001] 6585E Establishment of zoning districts For such purposes the legislative body may divide a county, a city, or portions thereof,into zones of the number,shape and area it deems best suited to cant' out I' 'mow the purpose of this chapter. 65852. Uniformity Allsuch regulations shall be uniform for each class or kind of building or use of. the regulation in one type of zone may differ from land throughout each zone,but those in other types of zones. 65852.1. "Granny" housing Notwithstanding 65906,any city, including a charter city, county,yr city. and county may issue a zoning variance, special use permit, or-conditional-tooreta use permit for a dwelling unit to be constructed, or which is attached>to or detached from, a primary residence on a parcel zoned for a single-family residence, if the dwelling unit is intended for the sole occupancy of one adult or two adult persons who are 62 years of age or over,and the area of floor space of the attached dwelling ! -- unit does not exceed 30.percent of the existing living area or the,area of the floor ' space of the detached dwelling unit does not exceed 1,200 square feet. This section shall not be construed to limit the requirements of Section 65852.2, ! or the power of local governments to permit second units. (b) ! [Amended;Chapter 1150,Statutes of 19901 :I iI144 ;1 h 2 115 ITEM NUMBER: B-3 DATE: 12/14/04 (AD�� Atascader0 City Council Staff Report- CityManager's Office Review of Assessment Districts and Special Taxes RECOMMENDATIONS: Council: 1. Appropriate $20,000 from the General Fund -Reserve and Tree Replacement Fund, direct staff to hire consultants to perform an initial study of a Citywide assessment district or special tax, carry out polling to determine levels of support, and if necessary conduct community workshops. 2. Direct staff to report findings regarding assessment districts and special taxes to the City Council at a future date. REPORT-IN-BRIEF: This report addresses the concern of 11 neighborhoods that expressed interest, via an informal petition, to form a neighborhood assessment district to improve the conditions of their local street. According to a recent survey of these neighborhoods, it appears - there is not enough support to move forward with the formation of neighborhood assessment districts. This will leave neighborhoods with the option of leaving their street as it is, or working with each other as a neighborhood association to perform the street improvements independent of the City. During the process of studying assessment districts for these neighborhoods, our research led us to consider other opportunities that generate revenue Citywide. Specifically, we looked at forming a larger assessment district for the purpose of Citywide roadmaintenance and repair, and the maintenance of trees, parks, landscape and open space. 116 ITEM NUMBER: B-3 DATE: 12/14/04 DISCUSSION: i The Current Situation: Neighborhood Requests Although surveys showed there was not neighborhood support for local assessment districts, it is important for the Council to understand the process that was undertaken, the costs that were involved, and the information that was provided to residents. The following tableillustrates the neighborhoods that previously expressed interest in creating neighborhood assessment districts, the number of parcels involved, and the estimated cost of repair needed. Costs are for construction and repair only, and do not take maintenance into account. ROAD PARCELS TOTAL • • • AURORA 12 10,400 $104,100 DIRT ROAD AZUCENA 43 43,560 $103,010 POOR ASPHALT/NO BASE _CALLE REFUGIO/ VIA TORTUGA 23 7,800 $7,605 MINOR IMPROVEMENTS-MAINTENANCE CORTINA 20. 24,000 $98,686 POOR ASPHALT/NO BASE ENCINAL 11 30,920 $97,919 POOR ASPHALT/NO BASE MANANITA 42 29,000 $175,288 2/3 POORLY PAVED- 1/3 DIRT MONTURA 7 10,520 $46,939 PAVED 20+YEARS AGO ORTEGA 14 46,620 $218,495 DIRT ROAD, NARROW BRIDGE OTERO 7 43,680 $115,553 DIRT ROAD PINAL 6 11,500 $51,821- POOR ASPHALT/NO BASE TOTALS •0: An independent engineering firm has studied and valued the recommended improvements at :approximately $1,033,908. An additional $100,000 is required for maintenance and administrative costs. This amount includes an annual set-aside of $70,000 for future street improvements, and $30,000 for annual administrative costs. In order to move forward, actual assessment costs must be determined for each neighborhood based on their road conditions and needs. Neighborhoods with similar street conditions will be grouped together and pay like assessments. The actual costs are determined by preparing a document called an engineer's report. The report details the improvements needed, the parcels included in the district the level of general benefit being received by each'parcel, and the cost per parcel. The report must be accepted by the City Council and a vote of the property owners must be taken. This process takesapproximately five to six months andcouldbe completed by late Spring 2005. 117 ITEM NUMBER: B 3 DATE: 12/14/04 Financing Alternatives and Costs for Neighborhood Assessments While previous studies have looked into financing neighborhood assessment districts with a publicly issued general obligation bond, such afinancing instrument is restrictive, inflexible, and costly for a project of this size. If any of the neighborhoods choose to move forward, additional financing alternatives could be considered, including: 1. Tax-Exempt Private Placement Bonds- This is a type of bond issued through a broker for up to a 30-year period, however, unlike general obligationbonds the bond issue is sold privately and not publicly. This avoids many of the issuance costs typically associated with a general.obligation bond. Like other bonds, the note is difficult to refinance or payoff without restrictions. Estimated financing/issuance costs are $35,000-$40,000 regardless of size. 2. Tax-Exempt Independent_Bank Loan- This is a simple loan obtained by a local' bank. The loan is secured by the new revenue stream and the City's credit. The interest-rate on this type of loan is usually higher and the loan term is shorter. Issuance costs aren't as much and the financing is more flexible if prepayment or a refinancing is preferred. For purposes of demonstrating the estimated cost to each parcel, assuming the City moved forward with the project and obtained financing of$1,033,000 plus startup costs through an independent bank loan, financed over 10 years, at a rate of 5.25%, the homes in the district would share an annual cost of approximately $145,,250. Adding to this amount the $100,000 required for annual maintenance, would result in an annual collection amount of $245,250. This would result in assessments ranging roughly from $650 to $4,200 per parcel depending on the condition of the neighborhood's existing street. This assessment amount assumes all neighborhoods are interested. If fewer neighborhoods participate, the startup and administrative costs would be spread-out to fewer homes, making the proportional payment to each home greater. These annual amounts could be reduced in some cases by up to 40% by extending the loan period for an additional 20 years, but this would require the use of private placement bonds and would cost each property more over the long term. Additional Neighborhood Input Last month, staff sent a letter to the property owners in each of the aforementioned neighborhoods to determine if there was still interest in considering a neighborhood assessment district for local street improvements. The letter indicated the approximate total and annual costs for street improvements, reviewed the process and timeline for moving forward, and requested a response from residents by November 24, 2004 to determine if a majority of residents were still interested. Although only a simple majority approval is required to implement these assessment-financing options, staff determined that it was prudent and appropriate to obtain a 60% support threshold before incurring the costs associated with pursuing the formation of an assessment district. 118 ITEM NUMBER: B-3 DATE: 12/14/04 The following table illustrates the responses received: Responses NEIGHBORHHOD PARCELS Received In-Favor Opposed RESULT AURORA 12 4 2 2 NO AZUCENA 43 10 6 4 NO CALLE REFUGIO/ VIA TORTUGA 23 2 0 2 NO CORTINA 20 4 2 2 NO ENCINAL 11 3 3 0 NO MANANITA 42 9 5 4 NO MONTURA 7 5 0 5 NO ORTEGA 14 6 2 4 NO OTERO 7 2 0 2 NO PINAL 6 3 2 1 NO responseTOTALS 185 48 22 26 24% According to the results, the 60% threshold was not met in any neighborhood and it appears these assessments will likely be cost prohibitive for many. Future Possibilities: Citywide Assessment Districts and Special Taxes Researching assessments for these neighborhoods revealed other opportunities for raising revenues citywide. These options will now be reviewed throughout the remainder of this report. With the increasing demand for City services, and the desire to improve city streets, and better manage the City's parks, open space, and trees, staff recognized that the City Council should consider options that generate additional funding for these purposes. Such measures would include asking the voters to form a citywide assessment district or approve a special tax. Creation of this new revenue source would provide a dedicated revenue stream for programs and would strengthen the City's financial position by further diversifying the City's sources of revenue. What Are Assessment Districts? Assessment districts are fairly common amongst California cities since the passage of Proposition 13 in 1978. Assessment districts exist to provide property owners with the option of raising revenues for specific projects or services. All assessment districts must be approved by a majority of property owners. There are three types of Assessment Districts: 1913 Act Assessment Districts (street construction), 1972 Act Assessment Districts (parks, trees, streetlights and open space construction, acquisition and maintenance), and 1982 Act Assessment Districts (street, curb,sidewalk and/or storm drain and flood control maintenance and services). Districts differ based on what the funds will be used for. 119 ITEM NUMBER: B-3 DATE: 12/14/04 What Could Assessment Proceeds be Used For? In Atascadero's case, funding is needed to repair and maintain the City's streets, trees, parks, and open space. Previous resident surveys suggest there may be support from property owners for these purposes. If the City Council decided to pursue funding for these purposes, the City would consider creating 1972 and 1982 Maintenance Assessment Districts. Specifically, assessment districts could be used to: Create a scheduled tree-trimming program for all of the City's trees, ensuring proper tree care and maintenance. • Purchase additional open space and expand available trails and recreational areas. • Improve and maintain the City's parks. • Improve and maintain the City's street right-of-ways, beautifying the City's landscape, and entry points. • Improve and maintain the City's 61 miles of collector and arterial roads. The Atascadero Road Program is currently being funded by gas taxes,-general funds, and one-time regional revenues that could dry up as the state and federal funding sources become bleaker. If this scenario happened, roads would further deteriorate. While 1982 Act Assessment Districts can also be utilized to fund local street maintenance (within residential tracts), a citywide District would be extremely complex with multiple rates and variables to address the wide variances in special benefit resulting from significant differences in neighborhood street improvementsresulting from differing lot sizes, street frontage, street conditions, etc. Additionally, the inclusion of 105 miles of local streets in a regular maintenance program at this time would greatly increase annual costs and would make assessments cost prohibitive for most property owners. How Much Do Assessments Cost and How Much Funding Is Raised? Assessments vary in amount depending on how much funding is needed, the improvements and services provided, and on the property owner's ability/desire to pay. The actual assessment paid also differs based on land use and special benefits received from the improvements and services provided. Single-family residential units on parcels less than a .25 acre typically pay a base assessment, while large residential parcels and commercial sites generally pay more. For example, if the city enacted an annual assessment of $150, smaller homeowners would pay that base assessment, while larger properties including commercial development would pay a proportionally larger share based on their proximity to and the benefit from the improvements. Assuming the assessments included parks, open space, trees and collector and arterial streets, a commercial property on a similar size lot would likely be assessed 2 to 2.5 times more, or $300-$375. This assessment difference may be considerably less if the assessment was for parks and open space only, or much greater if the assessment was for arterial and collector streets only. Taking the example one step further, the _$150 assessment would create an estimated annual revenue stream of approximately $2.5 million. 120 ITEM NUMBER: B- 3 DATE: 12/14/04 What is the Process for Forming an Assessment District? The process for creating an assessment district often depends on the time and effort p g P invested in public education and community outreach, but generally for a citywide district the process takes approximately 9-12 months and requires a commitment of resources from both staff and outside consultants. Assessment Districts are formed and voted on by property owners (votes are weighted based on the assessment that will be paid, $1 equals one vote) and not by registered voters. The district is formed if a majority of property owners don't object to formation of the district. Revenues are collected by the County and remitted to the City -semi-annually with property tax receipts. For illustrative purposes, Attachment A outlines the process that would be followed if a decision was made today, to further consider the formation of an assessment district. The formation of an assessment district must be completed by July for inclusion on the following fiscal year's property tax bills. Once property owner balloting approves the initial maximum assessment and the district is formed, the City conducts an annual public hearing for the district prior to levying the next year's annual assessments. Assuming the assessments for the upcoming fiscal year (based on a proposed budget and annual engineer's report) do not exceed the maximum assessments previously approved, additional property Iowner balloting is not, required to levy on-going assessments. If the proposed annual expenditures require a new or increased assessment, the increase must be approved through a property owner balloting. A Review of Special Taxes Implementing assessment districts is one way to raise local revenues. Another common method used is to seek approval for a voter-approved tax. While proceeds from general taxes (i.e. Property Tax; Sales and Use Tax; Business License Tax; Transient Occupancy Tax; Utility User's Tax; etc) are deposited into the general fund and are used'for-general governmental purposes, Special Taxes are earmarked for a specific purpose or governmental program. Special taxes can be implemented to finance a myriad of services if the City can obtain the two-thirds vote required to implement the taxa Special Taxes are in the form of a parcel tax on property and are: • flexible in structure and implementation; • Require super-majority approval (2/3 of registered voters); • A strict benefit nexus is not required. While assessments may only be levied for "special benefit" a special tax only needs to demonstrate reasonable benefit.This is a significant difference that often allows the method and rate structure to be much simpler and less difficult to explain to residents and property owners; • Funds may be spent on any purpose that the tax is created for, i.e. public safety, road maintenance, parks, trees, etc. The City is not limited to street and tree maintenance only. Generally there is more flexibility in how the overall tax revenues are spent as compared to assessments, but the money may only be used for the purposes for which the special tax was adopted and approved by the voters. For example, if a special tax was approved for street maintenance, the funding could potentially be used for any street improvements including neighborhood streets, provided that the ballot measure/ordinance did not restrict 121 the funds to specific streets, services or street types; ITEM NUMBER: B-3 DATE: 12/14/04 • Voter approval may be obtained at either a special or general election by ballot; • Ballot measures for special taxes must include a statement indicating the specific purposes of the tax; • The proceeds may only be applied to the specified purposes; • Similar to assessments, special tax are generally collected on the County tax rolls as art of each parcel'sproperty, tax bill. The. revenues collected by the p p County and remitted to the City are to be deposited into a separate account; and • The City must prepare an annual report for its governing body that includes the amount of funds collected and expended and the status of any project funded by the tax. FISCAL IMPACT: If the City chooses to move forward with the creation of assessment districts, the total estimated cost would be approximately $70,000. $30,000 is required for financial consultants and the engineer's report, $15,000 for marketing/polling costs, and $25,000 for balloting costs. Costs will be incurred incrementally as the process moves forward. At this point, only $45,000 is necessary for financial studies and polling. $25,000 is available in the existing budget and an additional $20,000 is needed. These funds would come from the City's General Fund and a portion from the Tree Fund as the assessment districts may be set u for open ace and treepreservation/planting. Y p P P Costs for implementing special tax would be somewhat less because an engineer's P 9 a P report is not required. Costs for each proposal must be fronted by the City, and if the assessment district or tax is formed, the new revenues can reimburse city for these costs. If an assessment district or tax is approved, new revenues of over $2 million annually could be realized. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Move forward with neighborhood assessment districts only. 2. Move forward to study citywide assessment district only. 3. Move forward with both districts simultaneously. 4. Don't implement assessment districts. 5. 'Move forward with consideration of a special tax. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A: Process for Forming Assessment Districts Attachment B: Process for Creating a Special Tax 122 ITEM NUMBER: B -3 DATE: 12/14/04 ATTACHMENT A PROCESS FOR FORMATION OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS Costs for certain steps are in parenthesis and would need to be fronted by the city. If the 'district was formed,the district would then reimburse the City for formation costs: Task: 1. Establish concept for assessment district and estimates for assessment unit values per land use type to determine revenues. 2. Conduct polling in community to determine potential support ($15,000) and a financial study of the proposed district ($15,000). Host community meetings. 3. City Council decides if the City wants to continue to move forward with assessment districts based on polling/meeting input. 4. Create a public information piece for distribution outlining costs, process, and benefits of an assessment district and the work to be done. Hold several community meetings to answer questions. 5. After distribution of information and meetings, determine level of community support. 6. If it appears that 60%of property owners are supportive of formation of the district, then proceed with an engineers report for the proposed district,($15,000). 7. Receive completed Engineer's Report. 8. Engineer's report submitted to the City Council for approval. Resolution of Intention is adopted setting the date and time for a public hearing regarding re ardin formation of the district. 9. Prepare public hearing notices and ballots for all property owners in ther p oposed assessment district.. 10. Send out ballots (ballots are weighted by the amount of proposed assessment so essentially it is $1 = 1 vote. ($20,000) 11. Public hearing held to receive arguments in favor and in opposition to the district. All ballots are due prior to the close of the hearing. 12. Ballots are tabulated. If more of the assessment is voted In opposition to the district than in favor, the Assessment District must be abandoned. If not, then the City Council may vote to approve the final Engineer's Report and establish the district. • 13. Engineer's Report turned over to County for enrollment on the 06-07 tax rolls. 14. Revenue is received from county. 123 ITEM NUMBER: B-3 DATE: 12/14/04 ATTACHMENT B PROCESS FOR APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL TAX Costs for certain steps are in parenthesis and would need to be fronted by the city. If the tax is approved, new revenues could then reimburse the City for election costs: Task: 1. Establish mechanism for special tax and estimates for The amount that would be paid and the revenue generated. 2. Conduct polling in community to determine potential support ($15,000) and a financial study of the proposed tax ($15;000). Host community meetings. 3. City Council decides if the City wants to move forward with A special tax. 4. Create a public information piece for distribution outlining proposed tax amounts, process, and benefits of a special tax and the benefits that will be derived. Hold several community meetings to answer questions. 5. After distribution of information and community meetings, determine level of community support. 6. If it appears that 55% of registered voters are supportive of The special tax,then proceed with setting a date for a special election. 7. Prepare notices and ballots for all registered voters in the City. 8. Conduct Special Election ($25,000). 9. Ballots counted and results announced. 10. Tax is levied by City Council. 11. Tax is collected. II 124 ITEM NUMBER: B -4 DATE: 12/14/04 r ■e e ■ 1918 ■ _ 19 8 Atascadero City Council Staff Report- Administrative Services Budget Calendar RECOMMENDATION: Council set a public hearing for January 11, 2005 to hear community priorities for the 2005-2007 budget cycle. DISCUSSION: The City of Atascadero adopted its first two-year budget in June of 2001, with the • current two-year budget cycle expiringin June of 2005. Although community wants, Council priorities, and department needs for the next budget cycle are constantly being gathered, the formal portion of the budget adoption cycle begins now for the 2005-2007 budget years. The first step in the budget adoption process is a public hearing. This -allows the Council and the public an opportunity to hear staff's preliminary outlook for the upcoming budget and more importantly to voice priorities, goals and objectives. This public hearing is closely followed by Council Strategic Planning in late January, where the community's priorities and goals are refined by Council. Then, over the next few months, these Council goals are translated into action plans by City staff and resources are allocated accordingly. Once staff has a budget which they believe meets the goals of the Council and the community, the budget is put before the Finance Committee. Any changes by the Finance Committee are made and the draft budget is brought before Council in June. A public hearing is held at that time to adopt the budget. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. ATTACHMENTS: Budget Calendar 125 City of Atascadero 2005-07 Operating and Capital Budget ,BUDGET CALENDAR January 11,2005 Town Meeting to receive preliminary budget picture and to hear community budget priorities. January, 2005 City Council Strategic Planning session February 9,2005 Distribute Budget Worksheets to departments March , 2005 Department Head strategic planning March 14,2005 Draft Budget Worksheets and all supplemental requests due to Administrative service department March,2005 Administrative services review draft budgets and supplemental requests with departments March 28,2005 Capital budgets due to Administrative Services Department April 11,2005 Draft budgets to City Manager April 18, 2005 City Manager comments on Department Draft Budgets and supplemental requests April 25,2005 Meeting of department heads to review and prioritize all supplemental requests May 9,2005 Final draft budget submitted to City Manager May 11, 2005 Final draft budget submitted to Finance Committee May 18,2005 Finance Committee review of Draft Budget May 24, 2005 Budget submitted for agenda packets June 14, 2005 Public Hearing on Budget June 28, 2005 Second Public Hearing if necessary 126