HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 10/13/1987 0 CINDY WILKINS
DEPUTY 'CITY. CLERK
NOTE: THERE WILL BE A CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION AT 6: 30 P.M.
IN THE ADMINISTRATION BUILDING FOURTH FLOOR CLUB ROOM
REGARDING PROPERTY NEGOTIATIONS (ATASCADERO LAKE PROPERTIES
GUIDRY AND POLICE FACILITY SITE (BENO'S)
AGENnA
ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
ATASCADERO ADMINISTRATION BUILDING
FOURTH FLOOR, ROTUNDA ROOM
OCTOBER 13. 1987
7:30 P. M.
RULES OF PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
* Members of the audience may speak on any item on the agenda.
* A person may speak for five (5) minutes.
• * No one may speak for a second time until everyone wishing to
speak has had an opportunity to do so.
* No one may- speak more than twice on any item.
* Council members may question any speaker; the speaker may
respond; but after the alloted time has expired, may not
initiate further discussion.
* The floor will then be closed to public participation and open
for Council discussion.
Call to Order
Pledge of Allegiance
Roll Call
Invocation - Pastor Phillip Sievers, Luteran Church of the
Redeemer
Plaque of Appreciation to Atascadero Board of Realtors
Donatin to the Charles Paddock Zoo
** Introduction of New Employee Dave Payton, Fire Fighter
City Council Comment
Committee Reports (The following represent Ad Hoc or Standing
Committees. Informative status reports will be given, as felt
necessary.
i
J
1. City/School Committee 6. Equal Opportunity Commission
2. North Coastal Transit 7. Police Facility Committee
3. San Luis Obispo Area 8. Atascadero Lake Acquistion
Coordinating Council Committee •
4. Traffic Committee 9. Tree Committee
5. Solid Waste Mgmt Committee 10 . Bicentennial Committee
(Approximate Time - 30 Minutes)
COMMUNITY FORUM
The City Council values and encourages exchange of ideas and
comments from you the citizen. The public comment period is provided
to receive comments from the public on matters other than scheduled
agenda items. To increase the effectiveness of Community Forum, the
following rules will be enforced:
* A maximum of 30 minutes will be allowed for Community Forum,
unless Council authorizes an extension.
* All remarks shall be addressed to Council as a whole and not to
any individual member thereof.
* No questions shall be asked of a Council Member or City staff
without permission of the Mayor.
* No person shall be allowed to make slanderous, profane,
impertinent, or personal remarks against any Council Member
or member of the City staff.
* Any person desiring to submit written statements may do so by.
forwarding to Council, prior to the Council Meeting, nine (9)
copies to the City Clerk by 5:00 p.m. on the Wednesday preceeding
the Council Meeting.
A. CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters listed under Item A, Consent Calendar, are considered to
be routine, and will. be enacted by one motion in the form listed be-
low There will be no separate discussion of these items. A member
of the Council or public may, by request, have any item removed from
the Consent Agenda, which shall be reviewed and acted upon separately
after the
adoption of the Consent Calendar .
1. Approval of City Council Minutes - September 22, 1987
2. Denial of Claim by Rosalie Hyde- for Augustine Hyde -
$850,000 Personal Damages
3. Denial of Claim by Thomas Bench in the Amount of $-250 ,000
4. Proclamation - Acknowledging October 25-31 as "Red Ribbon
• Week" (Drug Awareness Week)
2
5. Resolution 108-87 - Designation of a Stop Intersection on
Tranquila, Rosita, and Lobos at Intersection with San Anselmo
6. Resolution 107-87 - Designation of 2-Hour Parking on the
Northwest side of Pueblo, from E1 Camino to Sinaloa Avenue
7. Resolution 111-87 - Designation of a "No Parking" Sign
on the Northerly side of San Andreas, near Santa Lucia
(Behind Atascadero High School)
8. Approval of Tentative Lot Line Adjustment 14-87 -
800 Belle Vista - Atkinson/Twin Cities Engineering
9. Approval of Proposed San Luis Obispo County Visitors and
Conference Bureau Agreement - 9/1/87 - 9/1/88 - $2,300
10. Acceptance of Final Tract Map 4-87 - 9240 Atascadero Avenue
Hawkins/Cuesta Engineering
11. Authorization to Solicit Bids - Graves Creek Bridge Reconstruction
12. Resolution 99-87 - Establishment of a Policy Statement for
Disadvantaged Business Enterprises and Establishment of a
Liason Officer In Accordance with Federal Regulations
(Cont'd from 9/22/87)
U.. Acceptance`.of Final Parcel Map 37-86 - 7421 Santa Ysabel - Young
B. HEARINGS/APPEARANCES/REPORTS
(Approximate Time - 20 Minutes)
1. Zone Change 11-87 - 8485 El Corte - City of Atascadero
Initiated (Cont'd from 9/22/87)
A. Public Hearing
B. Ordinance 158 - Reverting the Existing Zone Designation
of Residential Multiple Family with Planned
Development #6 to the Prior Zoning Designation of
Residential Single Family, 1. 5-2. 5 Acre Minimum Lot Size
(FIRST READING)
(Approximate Time- 30 Minutes)
2. General Plan Amendment 2C-87 and Zone Change 6-87
9300 E1 Bordo - McCaslin/Hawkins
A. Public Hearing
B. Resolution 105-87 - Approving Amendment of the General
Plan from Low Density Single Family to High Density
Multiple Family
C. Ordinance 159 —Amending the Official Zoning from
RSF-Z to RMF-16 (PD-7) (FIRST READING)
w 3
0
(Approximate Time - 15 Minutes)
3. Proposed Zone 'Change 12-87 - 8750 E1 Camino Real -
Genzone
A. Public Hearing
B. Ordinance 161 - Revise Industrial Park Zoning
Designation to Commercial Service (FIRST READING)
(Approximate Time - 30 Minutes)
4. Zone Change and Tentative Parcel Map 10-87 - 6875 Tecorida -
Woodglen Ltd/Cuesta Engineering
A. Public Hearing
B. Ordinance 160 - Amending Existing Zoning of RMF/16 (FH)
to RMF 16 (FH) (PD7) Allowing Creation of a Planned
Development Overlay for Small Lot Subdivision Consisting
of Subdivison of 2.1 Acres into 9 Lots of Varying Sizes
from 3,968 to 7,074 Square Feet and Establishment of Los
Arboles as a Private Street Name (FIRST READING)
(Approximate Time - 10 Minutes)
5. Fiscal Year 1987/88 First Quarter Budget Status Report
(July to September)
C. UNFINISHED I ISHED BUSINESS
(Approximate Time 20 Minutes)
1. Mayor Selection Survey y -
Status Report
D. NEW BUSINESS
(Approximate Time 10 Minutes)
1. Consideration Regarding Appointment of Citizen Member to Traffic
Committee.
(Approximate Time - 10 Minutes)
2. Award of 1987-88 Road Resurfacing Program to Madonna Construction
for $423,105.84
(Approximate Time - 5 Minutes)
3. Resolution 106-87 - Amendment of Resolutions 21-85 and 112-86
- City Manager Terms and Conditions of. Employment- Agreement
1987/88
(Approximate Time 5 Minutes)
4. Resolution 103-87 - Adoption of Salary/Classification
Schedule and Benefits for Management Employees — F.Y. 1987/88
4
(Approximate Time 5 Minutes)
5. Resolution 104-87 - Adoption of Salary/Classification
Schedule and Benefits for Confidential Employees
E. ATASCADERO SANITATION DISTRICT
(Council will recess and convene as the Atascadero County
Sanitation District Board of Directors)
(Approximate Time - 10 Minutes)
1. Proposed Bordeaux House Sanitary Sewer Bypass - Financing
(Approximate Time - 5 Minutes)
2. Award of Sewer Cleaning (I & I) Bid to Milton Simon for $54,012.80
(Approximate Time - 5 Minutes)
3. Resolution 109-87 Approving Sewer Service to Portion of Lot
16, Block 13 (9925 Morro Road) (Evangelical Free Church of 1 .
Atascadero) and Incorporating the Area into Sanitation Improvement
District #2
(Approximate Time - 5 ' Minutes)
4. Resolution 110-87 - Approving Sewer Service Extension to Lots
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 24, Portions of Lots 6 & 7 of Tract 5,
and Parcels 1, 2, and 3 of Parcel Map AT 81-281 (El Bordo Avenue)
(The Board of Director will adjourn and reconvene as the
City Council)
F. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION
1. City Council
(Re-formation. of Contractor/Staff Ad Hoc Committee (Norris)
2. City Attorney
3. City Clerk
4. City Treasurer
5. City Manager
5
• ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL
MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 22, 1987
Atascadero Administration Building
The regular meeting of the Atascadero City Council was called to
order at 7:30 p.m. by Mayor Norris.
ROLL CALL
Present: Councilmembers Borgeson, Handshy, Mackey, Bourbeau, and
Mayor Norris
New Employees Harry Parsi, Public Works Senior Civil Engineer,
Brett Morris, Police Officer, and Cynthia Reid, Police Officer,
are introduced to Council.
Councilmember Bourbeau commends staff for completion of the bud-
get report for fiscal year 1986/87 in a timely manner, and for
the surplus of $600 ,000 .
Proclamations are presented to the City of Atascadero Fire and
• Police Department, and all outside agencies who contributed to
the City' s fire protection from the recent Los Altos fire.
CITY COMMITTEE STATUS
The Traffic Committee will meet tomorrow.
The Police Committee has received appraisal and structural
reports on Beno' s as a police facility site which will be
presented to Council at a later time.
The Bicentennial Committee will hold its celebration on Saturday,
September 26 in front of the Administration Building. All are
invited.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Sherry Baldner, Estrada Avenue, tells of a consistent neighbor-
hood concern with disruptive neighbors,,"Chief Mc Hale is requested
by Council to consult with Ms. Baldner regarding this nuisance.
Joe Nyle, Atascadero resident, presents "Mayor Survey" forms,
which he has gathered from outside of local grocery stores, to
• the City Clerk.
Terril Graham reviews current "granny housing" regulations in
Atascadero, and requests Council to review the requirements in a
positive manner for update .
1
•
Council directs the issue of "granny housing" to be reviewed in
the General Plan update.
A CONSENT CALENDAR
1. Approval of City Council Minutes - August 25, 1987
2. Approval of City Council Minutes - September 8, 1987
3. Proclamation - Acknowledging October 4-10, 1987 as
"National Mental Illness Awareness Week"
4. Proclamation - Acknowledging "American Business Women
September 22, 1987
5. Resolution 102-87 - Authorization for Mayor to .Enter into
Agreement with San Luis Obispo Area Coordinating Council
Joint Powers Agreement for Fiscal Year 1987/88
6. Denial of Claim by Erica Rip, et.al. - $25,000 - Personal
Damages •
7. Approval of Tentative Parcel Map 23-87 - 11605 San Marcos Road -
Proposed Subdivision of 10. 55 Acres into Two Lots of 5.2 Acres
Each - •Vaughan
8. Acceptance of Final Lot Line Adjustment 10-87 - 8435 Curbaril
Shearer/Volbrecht Surveys
9. Acceptance of Final Tract Map 30-86 - 8375 Amapoa Salmeron/
Cuesta Engineering
10. Acceptance of City Treasurer 's Report - August, 1987
11. Acceptance of City Finance Department Report - August, 1987
Item A-1, minutes of August 25, 1987 are removed from Consent
Calendar for amendment.
MOTION: Councilmember Bourbeau moves to approve the
Consent Calendar , except for Item A-1; Councilmember
Mackey seconds; Motion carries unanimously •
MOTION: Councilmember Mackey moves approval of the Consent
Calendar Item A-1, Minutes of the August 25, 1987
Council Meeting with amendments ; Councilmember Bourbeau
seconds ; motion carries unanimously
2
ITEM A-1. . . .PAGE 3 REVISED paragraphs 6 & 7 the word
Please add this amendment to yo r ower has been amended to higher)
agenda package.
B-1 ZONE CHANGE 11-87 - 8485 EL CORTE - INITIATED BY THE CITY
OF ATASCADERO
ORDINANCE 158 - REVERTING EXISTING ZONE DESIGNATION OF
RESIDENTIAL MULTIPLE FAMILY WITH PLANNED DEVELOPMENT #6 TO
HE PRIOR ZONING DESIGNATION OF RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMITy-4 ,
1.5 TO 2. 5 ACRE MINIMUM LOT SIZE (FIRST READING)
Due to applicant' s request, as he could not attend this meeting,
this item is continued to October 13, 1987.
I
It is noted that no public in attendance wished to speak to this
item.
B-2 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2A-87 AND ZONE CHANGE 4-87 - 8500
EL DORADO - LINDSEY/FUNK (PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
FOR DENIAL)
Henry Engen, Community Development Director , states that the
Planning Commission denied this proposal, as it would not offer a
beneficial effect on the area. There was significant showing of
residents against this proposal. It is clarified that the zoning
presently offers 1/2 acre development. Staff states that higher
densities could be achieved with additional road cirucilation.
Donald Funk, applicant representative, reviews his proposal and
possible alternate proposals which could be presented to increase
traffic circulation and thus allowing higher densities.
Council clarifies to Mr. Funk that it can address only the pro-
posal before them and not other possibilities at this time.
Adjacent neighbors Shelly Moss, Peggy Baskin, Greg Baskin, Ellen
Bruce, and Janice Wilson all speak against higher densities on
this site.
Council discussion continues regarding concerns with higher.
density in this area.
MOTION: Councilmember Bourbeau moves to accept staff
recommendation to deny General Plan Amendment 2A-87
and Zone Change 4-87 ; Councilmember Borgeson
seconds; Motion carries unanimously
B-3 REPORT ON 20 ,000 SQUARE FOOT LOTS AND FLAG LOT
CONCENTRATIONS
Per Council' s request, staff has reviewed the potential of new
20, 000 square foot lots with a focus on flag lot concentration.
3
B-1 ZONE CHANGE 11-87 - 8485 EL CORTE - INITIATED BY THE CITY
OF ATASCADERO
ORDINANCE 158 - REVERTING EXISTING ZONE DESIGNATION OF
RESIDENTIA MULTIPLE FAMILY WITH PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 46 TO
HE PRIOR ZONING DESIGNATION OF RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMTTLV
1.5 TO 2. 5 A E MINIMUM LOT SIZE (FIRST READING)
Due to applicant's equest, as he could not attend this meeting,
this item is cont inu d to October 13, 1987.
It is noted that no pu lic in attendance wished to speak to this
item.
B-2 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2A-87 AND ZON CHANGE 4-87 - 8500
EL DORADO - LINDSEY/FUN (PLANNING 00MMISSION RECOMMENDATION
FOR DENIAL)
Henry Engen, Community Develo ment Director, states that the
Planning Commission denied this pro osal, as it would not offer a
beneficial effect on the area. h re was significant showing of
residents against this proposal. t is clarified that the zoning
presently offers 1/2 acre develo nt. Staff states that higher
densities could be achieved wit a itional road cirucilation.
Donald Funk, applicant represe tativ , reviews his proposal and
possible alternate proposals hich co ld be presented to increase
traffic circulation and thus allowing igher densities.
Council clarifies to Mr. Fu k that it ca address only the pro-
posal before them and not ther possibili ies at this time.
Adjacent neighbors Shell Moss, Peggy Bask i , Greg Baskin, Ellen
Bruce, and Janice Wil on all speak agai t lower densities on
this site.
Council discussion c ntinues regarding con erns with lower
density in this area.
MOTION: Counci member Bourbeau moves to accept staff
recomm ndation to deny General Plan Amendment 2A-87
and Z ne Change 4-87 ; Councilme ber Borgeson
secon s; Motion carries unanimously
B-3 REPORT ON 0 ,000 SQUARE FOOT LOTS AND ' FLAG LOT
CONCENTRATIONS
Per Council' s r quest, staff has reviewed the potential of new
20, 000 square foot lots with a focus on flag lot concentration.
3
14
Henry Engen, Community Development Director , states that there •
could be an additional 128-20, 000 square foot lots developed with
approximately 66 potential flag lots.
C-1. AWARD OF PARK AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT BID FOR UTILITY
VEHICLE - SAM FERRANTE - SNIDER HI JET - $8 ,218 .18
Bob Best, Park and Recreaton Director, states that the low bid of
$8,218.18 by Sam Ferrante was under the $9,800 budgeted. Two
bids were received.
MOTION: Councilmember Mackey moves to award the bid for the
Park Utility vehicle to Sam Ferrante for a Snider Hi
Jet for $8,218.18; Councilmember Bourbeau seconds;
Motion carries unanimously
C-2 AWARD OF BID FOR SANTA YSABEL ROAD RECONSTRUCTION - M.S.
HEMRICK, INC. - $129,167.10
Paul Sensibaugh, Public Works Director , states that 5 bids were
received. Staff is recommending awarding the bid to lowest
bidder M.S. Hemrick for $129 ,167 , which is over the budget ' allo-
cation of $120,000. The remaining funding will be allocated from
SB-300 funds, from gastax carryover , and interest. The project
life is expected to take 28 to 40 days.
A Chamber of Commerce representative is invited to attend the
pre-construction conference, as this road is called out to be
used in the Colony Days parade return route.
MOTION: Councilmember Bourbeau moves to award the Santa
Ysabel Road Reconstruction Bid to M.S. Hemrick for
$129 ,167 .10; Councilmember Mackey seconds; Motion
carries unanimously
D-1 RESOLUTION 101-87 - PROPOSAL TO ACCEPT A PORTION OF
GRAVES CREEK ROAD, FROM SANTA ANA TO SAN FERNANDO, INTO THE
CITY MAINTAINED ROAD SYSTEM - GORDON T. DAVIS CATTLE
COMPANY
Paul Sensibaugh, Public Works Director recommends acceptance of
the proposed section of road, as it meets all City requirements
for acceptance.
Discussions continue regarding city requirements for acceptance
of roads into the system and the process.
Councilmember Bourbeau feels that City future revenue sources
• should be considered regarding the maintenance of accepted roads
into the system.
City Attorney Jorgensen states that a road policy will be forth-
4
coming with an additional requirement that roads accepted will
need to be contiguous with existing maintained roads.
D-2 RESOLUTION 95-87 - AUTHORIZATION FOR APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS
FROM COUNCIL CONTINGENCY ACCOUNT FOR $5,000 - ARSON REWARD
Acting Fire Chief Mike Mc Cain supports the arson reward amount
increase, as it adds additional incentive to help reduce arson
fires. He notes that the City does pay for all outside help
received in fighting fires.
Council discusses recent fires, costs thereof, and ways of
possibly reducing these costs through other government funding.
MOTION: Councilmember Bourbeau moves to Adopt Resolution
95-87 appropriating $5, 000 arson reward; Council-
member Mackey seconds; Motion carries unanimously
D-3 RESOLUTION 99-87 - ESTABLISHMENT OF A POLICY STATEMENT FOR
DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISES AND ESTABLISHMENT OF A
LIASON OFFICER, IN ACCORDANCE WITH FEDERAL REGULATIONS
Paul Sensibaugh, Public Works Director states that this reso-
lution is a requirement for receiving Federal grants and estab-
lishes a policy statement that the City recognizes the hardships
of individual small businesses. Staff representative is proposed
to be the Public Works Director, as most related projects are of
a Public Works Department nature.
No public comment is given on this item.
City Attorney Jorgensen expresses concerns regarding designation
of a position prior to adopting the policy, and that various
portions of the policy statement need to be confirmed prior to
approval.
MOTION: Councilmember Borgeson moves to continue Resolution
99-87 to the October 13 Council Meeting to allow
staff to complete additional portions of the policy;
Councilmember Bourbeau seconds; Motion carries
unanimously
D-4 RESOLUTION 96-87 - APPROVAL - OF THE MEMORANDUM OF
UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF, ATASCADERO ANIS THE
ATASCADERO- SERGEANTS SERVICE ORGANIZATION - FISCAL YEAR
1987/88
David Jorgensen, Administrative Services Director, states that
negotiations have been completed and that the organization' s
representative has signed the Memorandum of Understanding. Staff
recommends adoption of Resolution 96-87.
5
No public comment is given on this item.
MOTION: Councilmember Borgeson moves approval_ of Resolution
96-87; Councilmember Mackey seconds; Motion carries
unanimously
D-5 RESOLUTION 97-87 - ADOPTION OF SALARY CLASSIFICATION
SCHEDULE AND BENEFITS FOR MID - MANAGEMENT/PROFESSIONAL
EMPLOYEES- FISCAL YEAR 1987/88
David Jorgensen, Administrative Services Director, states that
negotiations have been completed and staff recommends the
approval of Resolution 97-87 .
No public comment was given on this item.
MOTION: Councilmember Borgeson moves approval of Resolution
97-87; Councilmember Bourbeau seconds; Motion
carries unanimously
D-6 RESOLUTION 98-87 - AMENDMENT TO THE MEMORANDUM OF
UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF ATASCADERO AND LOCAL 817
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, ATASCADERO CHAPTER
CLERICAL BARGAINING UNIT
David Jorgensen, Administrative Services Director, states that
the Clerical Unit Memorandum of Understanding has been adopted.
Staff is, however, recommending an amendment of Section 6 . 1.5, -
which will allow a range adjustment for Support Services Aides of
2.5% in January, 1988 and January, 1989.
MOTION: Councilmember Bourbeau moves approval of Resolution
98-87; Councilmember Mackey seconds; Motion carries
unanimously
E-1 RESOLUTION 100-87 - EXTENSION OF PUBLIC SEWER SERVICE TO'
LOT 214, BLOCK NC (4525 NAVIDAD) AND INCORPORATING IT INTO
THE BOUNDARIES OF SANITATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT #4
Paul Sensibaugh, Public Works Director , recommends approval of
this proposal. The lot in question is adjacent to a lot with
sewer service (not on same street) and the area is known for
septic problems. Sewer service extension to Navidad is not known
at this time. The lot in question is uphill from the- sewe-r and
gravity would- have an affect on property on Colima. Staff clar-
ifies that the applicant has been apprised of all cost-s involved
and is agreeable.
No public comment was given on this item.
MOTION: Councilmember Bourbeau moves approval of Resolution
100-87; Councilmember Mackey seconds; Motion carries
unanimously
6
' 0 •
F-1
CITY COUNCIL COMMENT
A. COUNCIL MEETING REARRANGEMENT
All agree that the rearrangement is acceptable.
B. RECONSTITUTION OF THE CONTRACTOR'S COMMITTEE - NORRIS
It is noted that the full Contractor ' s Committee has not met for
some time. The group was formed to review concerns and gaps that
may form between City requirements and contractor 's concerns. A
sub-committee has been meeting since on an ongoing basis.
Councilmember Borgeson expresses her concerns with the breakdown
of committees into smaller subcommittees, and questions this
logic stating, "if you want a small committee, appoint a small
committee" .
Councilmember Norris states that she will be attending the next
Contractors Board Meeting and will verify full committee member-
ship interest.
C. MAYOR ELECTION SURVEY
Council discusses the status of the survey. It is clarified that-
this survey is being done in an informal nature., and is to be
used as an information gathering tool to get public opinion on
this subject. It is noted that the survey will conclude
September 30, and results will be presented at the following
Council Meeting by the City Clerk.
The Council meeting is adjourned at 10 :45 and will reconvene on
September 27 for a Joint City Council/Planning Commission Meeting
at 7:30 p.m. in the Administration Building Rotunda Room.
Submitte by:
Kar aughan
Depufty City Clerk
7
M E M O R A N D U M
To: Mike Shelton, City Manager
From: David G. Jorgensen, Admin. Svcs. Director
Date: September 23, 1987
Subject: Claim of Rosalie Hyde for Augustine Hyde
RECOMMENDATION
City Council deny the above-mentioned claim in the amount
of $850, 000. 00 , which was submitted on July 16, 1987.
• BACKGROUND
Claimant, a minor, was a passenger in a car and injured
in a headon collision. Claimant states inadequacy of
roadway caused the accident. Our claims adjustors, Carl Warren
and Company have reviewed the claim and recommend denial.
• v.
17
•
M E M O R A N D U M
To: Mike Shelton, City Manager
From: David G. Jorgensen, Admin. Svcs. Director
Date: October 7, 1987
Subject: Claim of Thomas Bench
RECOMMENDATION
City Council deny the above-mentioned claim in the amount
of $250, 000 .00 , which was submitted on September 25, 1987.
• BACKGROUND
Claimant alleges City Planning Comission and City Council have
not allowed claimant to split his lot to develop same, thus
the value of the property has been diminished Our claims
adjustors Carl Warren & Co. , have reviewed the claim and
recommend denial.
•
A Z 'DA
P R O C L A M A T I O N
ACKNOWLEDGING AND SUPPORTINGS`
"RED RIBBON WEEK"
OCTOBER 25-31, 1987
WHEREAS, Californians for Drug Free Youth, Inc. ; a state z
wide parent/community organization, and the California Department _ ¢
for Alcohol and Drug Programs are co-sponsoring. "Red Ribbon Week" •; � '.
from October 25-31 1987• andx
L�
WHEREAS, schools, businesses, law enforcement, churches, x "'
hospitals, service clubs, government agencies, and individuals in
the State of California will demonstrate their commitment for a
drug-free society by wearing and displaying red ribbons during
this week-long campaign; and
THEREFORE, the City Council .of Atascadero _does hereby
• acknowledge and support the "Red Ribbon Campaign" and encourages £i
its citizens to participate in drug awareness activities.
IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council encourages its
citizens to pledge, "The Choice For Me. . .Drug Free" .
BARBARA NORRIS
Mayor
October 14, 1987
1
•
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: City Council
THROUGH: Mike Shelton , City Manager
FROM: Pawl aensibaugh, Director of Public Works
SUBJECT Resolution Establishing Stop Intersections
on Tranquilla, Rosita , and Lobos at their
intersections with San Anselmo
DATE: October 5 , 1987
Recommendation :
The Traffic Committee recommends that Council adopt
the attached Resolution establishing Stop intersections on
• Tranquilla , Rosita, and Lobos at their intersection with
San Anseimo Avenue .
Background:
The Traffic Committee has received a number of
requests from residents in this area to install stop
intersections at these locations . The site has been
observed by the committee and stop intersections are
determined to be appropriate .
Fiscal Impact :
The cost to the City is approximately ;ISS? to be paid
out of the 1987188 budget .
•
RESOLUTIONI NO. 108-87
RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ATASCADERO DESIGNATING A STOP
INTERSECTION ON TRAN�.!UILLA, ROSITA AND LOBOS
AT THEIR INTERSECTIONS WITH SAN ANSELMO
WHEREAS , Section 4-2 . 801 et seq, of the Atascadero
Municipal Code allows the City Traffic Engineer to
determine the location of STOP intersections , and to place
and maintain appropriate signs or markings indicating the
same; and
WHEREAS, the Atascadero Traffic Committee has
recommended that establishing a STOP intersection on
Tranquilla, Rosita , and Lobos Avenues at the intersection
with San Anselitio Avenue will alleviate 3 hazardous
traffic condition :
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of •
Atascadero directs t'ne City Traffic Engineer to place and
maintain appropriate signs or markings indicating a STOP
intersection at the location 'Listed above .
On motion by , and seconded by
,the foregoing . Resolution is hereby
adopted in its entirety on the following roll call ;rote :
AYES :
NOES :
ABSENT :
ADOPTED:
ATTEST :
BOYD C . SHARTIZ City Clerk BARBARA PdORRiS Iiayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: '.P-PROVED AS TO" CONTENT :
JEFFREY G. JORGENSEN PAUL M. SENSIBAUGH •
City Attorney Director of Pubic Works
City Erngineer
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Council
THROUGH: Mike Shelton , City Manager
FROM: Paul M. Sensibaugh, Director of Public Works
SUBJECT : 2 Hour Parkinq - Pueblo Avenue
DATE: October 6 , 1987
Recommendation :
The Traffic Committee recommends that Council approve
the attached Resolution establishing a 2 Hour Parking zone
on the Northwest side of Pueblo Avenue from El Camino Real
to Sinaloa Avenue ,
Background:
• This request was brought to the Traffic Committee by a
businessman in the area who requested limited time parking
to prevent all day parking in the spaces directly in front
of his business . Due to the 2 Hour Parking on El Camino
Real , some all day parking has shifted to the side streets
causing a problem for some of the merchants .
Fiscal Tmpact :
The cost to the City is approxiiriately 100 to be paid
out of the 1987-88 budget .
•
•
RESOLUTION NO. , 107-87
RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ATASCADERO DESIGNATING A 2 HOUR PARKING
ON THE NORTHWEST SIDE OF PUEBLO FROM EL CAMINO REAL
TO SINALOA AVENUE
WHEREAS, Section 4-2 . 1301 et seg, of the Atascadero
Municipal Code allows the City Traffic Engineer to
determine the location of 2 Hour Parking zones , and to
place and maintain appropriate signs or markings indicating
the same; and
WHEREAS . the Atascadero Traffic Committee has
recommended 2 Hour Parking on the Northwest side of Pueblo
Avenue from El Camino Real to Sinaloa Avenue ;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that he City of
Atascadero directs the City Traffic Engineer to place and
maintain appropriate signs or markings indicating a 2 Hour
Parking zone as described above . •
--)n Motion by ,ar.d seconded by
,the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted
in its entirety on the following roll call rote :
AYES;
NOES ;
ABSENT :
ADOPTED:
ATTEST :
BOYD C SHARITZ City Clerk BARBARA NORRIS , Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT :
JEFFREY G . 1ORGENSEN PAL M . ;tSEN'SIBAUGH
City Attorney Director of Public ',Forks/
City Engineer ,
•
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Council
THROUGH: Mike Shelton , City Manager
FROM: Paul Sensibaugh, Director of Public Works
SUBJECT : Resolution Prohibiting Parking in an area
Behind the High School
DATE: October 6 , 1987
Recommendation
The Traffic Committee recommends that Council approve
the attached resolution prohibiting parking on the
Northerly side of San Andres from a point that is
approximately 150' from Santa Lucia to a point
approximately 775' from Santa Lucia (Basketball Courts) and
• then from a point approximately 975 feet from Santa Lucia
(opposite end of Basketball Court) to a point approximately
200' from the San Andres Atascadero Creek Bridge .
Background:
Parking in this area has been a continuing problem for
the residents in the area and previously a resolution was
passed prohibiting parking in a portion of the area
described here . We have received complaints from both the
residents in the area and the School Disrict requesting
that this area be posted for No Parking. There is adequate
student parking in the lower parking lot to accommodate
these cars .
Fiscal Impact :
The cost of establishing this No Parking area will be
approximately $200 to be paid out of the 1987-88 street
department budget .
RESOLUTION NO 111-87
RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO .
DESIGNATING A NO PARKING ZONE ON THE NORTHERLY SIDE OF
SAN ANDRES FROM A POINT APPROXIMATELY .150 FT . FROM SANTA
LUCIA TO A POINT APPROXIMATELY 750 FT . FROM SANTA LUCIA
CTO BASKETBALL COURTS) AND THEN FROM A POINT APPROXIMATELY
975 FT . FROM SANTA LUCiA (OPPOSITE END OF BASKETBALL COURTS
TO A POINT APPROXIMATELY 300' FROM THE SAN ANDRES-
ATASCADERO CREEK BRIDGE
THIS RESOLUTION TO SUPERCEDE RESOLUTION NO. 41--86
WHEREAS, Section 4-12 . 1101 et sequence of the
Atascadero Municipal Code allows the City Traffic Engineer
to determine the location of NO PARKING areas , and to place
and maintain appropriate signs or markings indicating the
same; and
WHEREAS , The Traffic Committee has studied the traffic
problems at this 'Locations in response to resident' s
complaints and at the request of the Atascadero Unified
School District and has determined that No Parking zones
are appropriate for this location .
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of
Atascadero directs the City Traffic Engineer to place and
maintain appropriate signs or markings as indicated above . •
On Motion by Councilman ,and seconded
L,y Councilman the foregoing resolution is
hereby adopted in its entirety on the foilo: ,ling roll call
vote : 1
AYES .
NOES :
ABSENT
ADOPTED:
ATTEST : CITY OF ATACADERO
BOYD C . SHnRITZ , �ity Clerk BARBARA NORRIS, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT
JEFFREY G. JGRGEi�ISEN PAUL I1-1. SENSIBAUGH i
City Attorney Director of Public Works/
City Engineer
i�{ K
l
�-. r"' �'-✓ t5'`a $� `.�£ �,. '`c..` ,rte.. 4�� �
€ s
s :' '
x r
yyy
44.
1.44 i
{
1 moi✓ „�•� � � a '� w� -�
i .yam Vie.
5 {,
.. t
d
5 --
Y +sr
� T7'
r S 3 r,s f i-> .L SM es, '� M1 '. �'�.7.yt✓ - f� ,`y't,.t � t —
s
Z Y; 'S,... p� t S 5 t Y _- � -'V r �i'�' •A*!"�88t 1 ��,:j !+l-�� #.3 F¢�Si �*i .�t. ��
" iuN S � t:- x` { *t TT a � l d3 Wit/ .ii L _ •YG..'s -r-
f '
d 3 �> -..{;... 2 .•'x,s ,-f i�,�3.T. _ a" 'ry. ��. .� 7'J"ti��.M1 t,�
.,i r•gv tA,a " ���-t3 Std .. .s.'htL,t•a. #� �' :;� "r
71
41
7 1'r
Fo lidMat 1
. Al
9Aie,. _ � `' ( -f i
7ka
.a,.Ser '' 4:a i# '"� warat�r"�r- - ""s.t m� ,��'llfr , " .,•, �•
.. �� �� 11.K#y�.:x � � �. � y� F 5 r �"�E -. {to�r •+�µt.r -
tx `x• °J .}>x
fir a i t
'" k. ', M
,.➢�:�[c � � 4 - •.� � xy y�E.•c'..'a.0.. �� ��. +� 0!y3� ��, j ;fir';;.
`r 5 '
j
t) ` � � �„i � ��'��� r 'fir ,• ,� � `�„ `..
•fes.. .rm - Fr 3r
• f {^ x.4 Mb+RC f4
;;aa.�,� I r•�
.•.�'� Yt.:'-moi ,. �' y^.., ! ;� � � ��. � 6�1Y'R'<Jx. .
4 � ,
d ""T'",�S' �� "'�` s� 'a,r° s +"� '�.tk• `may
JAI-
AA
VA
�l4 �nl
a
vt
41.
At
'. ...a*'x � �. Fes, " �' r��.�i�,�` � •�' 1�. ���:,� �-,... r
a ' � � � ►
a at
t_
K
� YY� �4.'-i.� w�� , �t�.a h .. '2�"u�'S� � �:�'t ,• •IE9 NMy.""_.y"�*��, 9F)" ,�".
s
,{` 'itg K.'xR y 1Sir' e�♦ �+ 2' i5 tom" � ♦i Yy ,�e,�
+•'�� "•�t j t j4� �$ �wc d'b tt 3A � I. ,y S ,�f'+
Avt '*3as
' 'S } <�,' ,R"°� ui�rL .. ''P .s� sy�: Jul as{.d('.•i t ,N
K t
?7
TIF
i
y�►3tyri >y dors * rrv=i�,z +v s t ?�3 a� P7
vrtt sit
�... AL
tr Z.
1 V'
.i ry
r*
y tr yf fit:'.
�► to 0 / � 4 ,� ` U
• M E M O R A N D U M
TO: City Council October 13, 1987
VIA: Michael Shelton, City Manager g %
FROM Henry Engen, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Lot Line Adjustment 14-87
LOCATION: 8000 Belle Vista
APPLICANT Frank Atkinson (Twin Cities Engineering)
REQUEST: To adjust the property line between two (2) existing lots
of record.
BACKGROUND:
The Planning Commission reviewed the above-referenced subject on its
• consent calendar on September 15, 1987, unanimously approving the re-
quest subject to the findings and conditions contained in the attached
staff report.
There was no public testimony given.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve Lot Line Adjustment 14-87 subject to the findings and condi-
tions of approval.
HE:ps
cc: Frank Atkinson
Twin Cities Engineering
CITY OF ATASCADERO Item: A-3 •
STAFF REPORT
FOR: Planning Commission Meeting Date: 9/15/87
BY:4APSteven L. DeCamp, Senior Planner File No: LLA 14-87
SUBJECT:
Request to adjust the property line between two (2) existing lots
of record.
A. SITUATION AND FACTS:
1. Applicant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Frank Atkinson
2. Representative. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Twin Cities Engineering
3. Project Address. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8000 Belle Vista
4. Legal Description. . . . . . . . . . . .Lot 4, Block 14, Atas Colony
and Parcel 2 of PM CO-77-145 •
5. Site Area. . . . . .. . . . . . . . .Lot 1 - 2.52 acres
Lot 2 - 8. 21 acres
6. Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .RS (Residential Suburban)
7. General Plan Designation. . . . .Suburban Single Family
8. Existing Use. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Lot 1 - Vacant
Lot 2 - SFR, Garage
9. Environmental. Status. . . . . . . . .Categorically Exempt
(Class 5)
B. ANALYSIS:
The subject property is located in the RS (Residential Suburban)
zone. Minimum lot size in this zone ranges between 2. 5 and 10. 0
acres depending upon the "score" of the various performance
standards. Lot 1 is smaller than the minimum, allowed=by- the
zoning ordinance, Lot 2 is larger than the minimum allowed lot
size.
The proposed lot line adjustment will be conditioned to ensure an
equal exchange of land between the two affected parcels. City
policy has been to allow lot line adjustments in cases such as
this provided that the degree of nonconformity of any lot is not
Lot Line Adjustment 14-87
September 18, 1987
Page 2
increased. The proposed adjustment will not increase the degree
of nonconformity of Lot 1.
Based on the above, it is Staff' s determination that the proposed
lot line adjustment does not present any substantial planning
issues. The proposed map, as conditioned, complies with City
policies and standards.
C. RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of Lot Line Adjustment 14-87 based on
the Findings in Exhibit C and the Conditions of Approval in
Exhibit D.
ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A - Location and Zoning
Exhibit B - Proposed Lot Line Adjustment
Exhibit C — Findings for Approval
Exhibit D - Conditions of Approval
SLD:sld
>e 418 i
CITY OF ATASCADERO ��►-��o� , ZaN,n�
1 ' 1975 1
can 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT LLA 1 -4 - Sl
A"� oto
DEPARTMENT
/
—Et1DINOCA
SP t
NA 'A TA J 2 p h --
� N t
o �
4 �6 bN
6
D AB
P
P OLA
OP
i
P �
4 P
FS
\qO Pia �
OL
7 (OS Gpt S \\� QfC
h
V/y�q
RS A • c
SI � E
4�00o P.��II� V►s-��
A GAB
cz
O
r
I � �
\ DS
P b
CITY
OF ATASCADERO
,�-4,81A 4� , ,9,.-7
A�COC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AJ3u4mcm4- Maf
DEPARTMENT
LLA 14 —8?
f� Z'4Z LCT
2.6zAC-
' GRu,w4e torL#qS o'
aS� —FF vn��rT p
�r`e�v/or�az
L O T iOl 2
L.
I
� "-i ori+',•�\ �
r•1!f��L� \1
o to a� zm
j
EXHIBIT C - Findings for Approval
Lot Line Adjustment 14-87
September 15, 1987
FINDINGS:
1. The application as submitted has been determined to be
categorically exempt from the requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act.
2. The application as submitted conforms with all applicable
zoning, general plan and subdivision regulations of the City
of Atascadero.
. EXHIBIT D - Conditions of Approval
Lot Line Adjustment 14-87
September 15, 1987
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. The lot line adjustment as generally shown on the map
attachment provided herein shall be submitted in final map
format or reflected in a record of survey to be approved by
the Community Development Department prior to recordation.
2. The proposed adjusted lot lines shall be surveyed and
monuments set at the new property corners prior to
recordation of the final map or record of survey.
3. The proposed lot line adjustment shall be drawn to insure an
equal exchange of property between the affected parcels.
4. If a final map is to be recorded, all existing easements
shall be delineated thereon.
5. Approval of this lot line adjustment shall expire two years
from the date of approval unless a time extension has been
granted pursuant to a written request prior to the expiration
date.
COPY IN FILE
•
San Luis Obispo County
Visitors & Conference Bureau
September 21, 1987
Mr. Mike Shelton
City of Atascadero
P.O. Box 747
Atascadero, CA 93423
Dear Mike,
I am so delighted that the City of Atascadero has voted to
support the San Luis Obispo County Visitors & Conference Bureau
for the second year. The first year was devoted to the formation
and organizational structure of the bureau. The second year will
• be devoted to obtaining some tangible results due to our
marketing efforts. I 'm glad you'll be a part of this process.
I have enclosed the promotional agreement between the VCB and the
city for your signature and of the other parties concerned.
Please sign and return the original copy with your payment by the
date indicated on the agreement.
I look forward to another successful year in tourism promotion
and to your continued support.
incerely,
Y)A&k,-
onni S. Eylar
irector
•
1041 Chorro Street, Suite E, San Luis Obispo, California 93401 (805) 541-8000
TOURISM PROMOTION AGREEMENT
This agreement made and entered into this 1st day of September
1987, by and between the Chamber of Commerce of San Luis Obispo,
Inc. , a California not-for-profit corporation, hereinafter
referred to as "Chamber" and CITY OF ATASCADERO, a municipal
corporation hereinafter referred to as "City" .
W I T N E S S E T H
WHEREAS, the City is desirous of increasing the economic well-
being of the county through tourism development,
AND WHEREAS, the Chamber has organized the San Luis Obispo County
Visitors & Conference Bureau for the express purpose of promoting •
the tourism attributes of San Luis Obispo County and its cities.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:
1. Scope of Services. The Chamber shall maintain the San Luis
Obispo County Visitors & Conference Bureau, hereinafter referred
to as "Bureau" , as a standing committee of the - Chamber but
separate for accounting purposes. This Bureau shall include
exclusively identifiable offices, telephone number, address, and
at least one full-time, professional staff person totally devoted
to the work of the Bureau.
The Chamber agrees that the Bureau activities will include, but
•
. TOURISM PROMOTION AGREEMENT page 2
not be limited to, the following: newspaper, magazine, and
direct mail advertising, participation at travel trade shows and
missions, brochure and other publications development,
solicitation of group and conference business, assistance with
conference planners, media relations, act as liason with the
State Office of Tourism, and other activities which would
reasonably be a part of a tourism promotion program.
The Chamber agrees to spend funds generally in accordance with
the following guidelines: 35% for advertising and advertising
production, 20% for trade show and sales mission participation,
15% for publications and brochure development, and 30% for
salaries and administrative costs.
2 . Time of Performance and Termination. This contract shall be
effective as of September 1, 1987 and shall terminate on September
1, 1988 unless extended from year to year by mutual written
agreement of both parties.
3 . Compensation. For services rendered, Chamber shall be paid
$2 , 300. A payment of $2 , 300 shall be made on or before October
1, 1987 .
4. Records. Chamber agrees that the Bureau will keep complete
financial records of income and expenses separate from the
TOURISM PROMOTION AGREEMENT page 3
Chamber and that the Bureau will produce financial and activity
reports on a quarterly basis, to be made no later than 30 days
following the end of the calendar quarter.
Chamber agrees to audit the finances of the Bureau annually.
Financial records of the Bureau shall be available for inspection
by the City upon reasonable notice to Chamber and may be audited
by the City annually at the City's expense.
5. Insurance. Chamber agrees to maintain insurance for the life
of this agreement in a single-limit amount of not less than
$1, 000, 000 for bodily injury and property damage covering the
scope of services of this agreement.
6. Independent Contractor. The Chamber, and all the agents and
employees of Chamber and the Bureau, in the performance of this
agreement, shall act in an independent capacity and not as
officers, employees or agents of the City.
7. General Provisions.
A. This agreement contains all the terms and conditions
agreed upon by the parties. No other understandings, oral or
otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this agreement, shall
be deemed to exist or to bind any of the parties hereto.
B. All materials, files, photographs, manuscripts, and
artwork produced under the terms of this agreement shall remain
. TOURISM PROMOTION AGREEMENT page 4
the property of the Bureau during the agreement period and after
the agreement expires.
C. This agreement shall be governed and construed in
accordance with all the laws of the State of California.
D. The Chamber certifies that it does not discriminate and
shall refrain from discrimination against any person or group of
persons, on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital
status, ancestry or national origin.
ATTEST: CITY OF ATASCADERO
By: By;
Deputy City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM: CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF SAN LUIS .
OBISPO, INC.
BY: BY
CITY ATTORNEY PkESIDEN
BY:
EXECUTIVE MANAGER
•
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: City Council October 13, 1987
VIA: Michael Shelton, City Manager
FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Final Tract Map 4-87
LOCATION: 9240 Atascadero Avenue
APPLICANT: Michael Hawkins (Cuesta Engineering)
• On April 7, 1987, the City Council approved Tentative Tract Map
4-87, subject to certain conditions and in concurrence with the
recommendation of the Planning Commission. The required condi-
tions have been complied with and the final map is recommended
for approval.
HE:ps
cc: Mike Hawkins
Cuesta Engineering
t
9s.. --- 1
i� •r - t 3Q � I �
2 \ ;
h \ u
•
qgo �
/ I
/f7 \
fib
O '\
,(•tOGfL d-S- c•150 e' - I \ _
sl.v s w 1
ATA5CAD CA0 , AY
----------------
CN
----- to
W � � �4�\ \ V � $T Z� l^ yeti •�
c
Tg°yvo
• MEMORANDUM
To: Mayor and City Council
Through: Michael Shelton, City Manager
From: Pau` _� Sensibaugh, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Subject : Authorization to bid Monterey Bridge over Graves Creek
Date : October 1, 1987
Recommendation:
Staff recommends that Council authorize the Public Works Director
to approve the plans and specifications and to advertise for bids for
the Monterey Road-Graves Creek bridge project .
Backround:
This project is one of four bridges in the present budget that
*has received an 80% Federal Aid-Highway Act grant being administered
by Caltrans . The project was designed by Bischel & Karns of
Sacramento. The project will remove the existing bridge and erect a
wider and longer single span reinforced concrete deck bridge,
.including a pedestrian walkway on the school side of the street.
Discussion:
There was what is called a "design exception" requested by the
State to place an extended guard rail into an area outside the present
right-of-way near .the tree farm that is now being finalized. Also,
the environmental study has drawn attention to a historical site under
the present Monterey Rd. Elementary School grounds . Although
additional attention has been directed toward this issue, clearance is
expected very soon. There are a few other incidental paperwork loose
ends that are being resolved with Caltrans, otherwise the project is
esentially ready to bid.
Fiscal Impact :
The estimated cost of the total project with engineering is
approximately $325,000 with the City participation of 20%, or -
$65, 000 . This money is budgeted in the 1987-88 C. I .P. budget .
•
MEMORANDUM
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
Through: Michael Shelton, City Manager �aA
From: Paul M. Sensibaugh, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Subject : Disadvantaged Business Enterprises Policy
Date : September 15, 1987
Recommendation:
Staff recommends that Council adopt the attached resolution
•establishing a Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBE) Policy and
Liaison Officer.
Backround:
The newly enacted "Surface Transportation and Uniform Relocation
Assistance Act of 1987" revised the DBE requirements for contracts and
subcontracts for projects receiving Federal-Aid funds. Such projects
are the four bridges replacement projects, FAU and FAS road-related
Projects, Revenue Sharing projects, and transit fund projects .
More specifically, Section 106(c) of the "Federal-Aid Highway Act
of 1987" requires that an annual goal of not less than 10% be
established for the participation of small business concerns owned and
controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals .
Additionally women shall be included into this category and a seperate
goal for Women Business Enterprises (WBE) is no longer acceptable .
Discussion:
The Monterey Road-Graves Creek Bridge is. nearing= approva-l' to bid
from Caltrans and- since the Highway Act is now in effect, the City
must (1) establish a Policy Statement by council action, (-2) designate
a DBE Liaison Officer, (3) establish an annual goal , (4) establish .
individual project goals, (5) give public notification of annual goal
0
on an annual basis and (6) administer the DBE policy. __
The annual goal is the aggregate of the individual contract •
project goals that are expected during the federal fiscal year. By
establishing the annual goal now the project goals can be set
individually with a single goal less than or greater than the annual
goal . A project goal is based on the size (cost) and type of work,
availability of DBE participation, and past achievement . Title 49CFR
requires that a waiver must be requested and approved for an annual
goal of less than 10%.
Fiscal Impact :
The fiscal impact of the required policy is unknown at this time
and may never be fully determined. The abstract factors such as
availability of DBE' s, inefficiencies due to subletting just to meet
the requirements, inexperience and unforseen actual administrative
time could be costly. On the other hand the value of the grant itself
will outweigh the negatives . The accumulation of requirements,
however, sometimes does not outweigh the negatives especially on
smaller projects .
•
•
0 0
RESOLUTION No. 99-87
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO ESTABLISHING A
POLICY STATEMENT FOR DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISES
(DBE) AND ESTABLISHMENT OF A DBE LIAISON OFFICER IN
ACCORDANCE WITH CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS 49,
PART 23, SECTION 23.45 AND OTHER RELATED SECTIONS
WHEREAS, CFR 49 23 requires the establishment of a Policy
Statement and a Liaison Officer with respect to Disadvantaged Business
Enterprises; and
WHEREAS, certain certain City projects receive Federal-Aid funds;
and
WHEREAS, the City recognizes the hardships of small business
concerns owned and controlled by socially and economically
disadvantaged individuals; and
WHEREAS, the minimum acceptable goal for contracts is 10% DBE.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Council of the City of
Atascadero does hereby establish the policy to utilize Disadvantaged
Business Enterprises (DBE) in all aspects of contracting to the
maximum extent feasible . This policy is fully described herein on
Exhibit A which constitutes policy and commitment to substantially
increase Disadvantaged Business Utilization. This policy includes any
Program activity funded wholly or in part by any U.S. Department of
Transportation modal element .
This City, its contractors and subcontractors, which are the
recipients of Federal-Aid funds, agree to ensure that DBE firms have
the maximum opportunity to participate in the performance of contracts
and subcontracts . In this regard, this City and all of its
contractors and subcontractors will take all reasonable steps in
accordance with 49 CFR 23 to ensure that DBE firms have the maximum
opportunity to compete for and perform contracts .
•
On motion of Councilperson and seconded by
Councilperson the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted
in its entirety on the following vote :
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
DATE:
ATTEST: City of Atascadero
BOYD C. SHARITZ, City Clerk BARBARA NORRIS, Mayor
By:
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
JEFFREY G. JORGENSEN PAUL M. SENSIBAUGH
City Attorney Director of Public Works/
City Engineer
0 EXHIBIT A •
I. Adopt Policy Statement
II . Disadvantaged_Business_En.terprise (DEE) Liaison Officer
Paul M. Sensibaugh , Director of Public Works/City Engineer
is the DBE Liaison Officer for this agency and shall report
to the City Manager . He/She will be assigned such staff as
is necessary to fully implement the provisions of 49CFR Part
23 and such other DBE programs as may be required.
III . Duties_of DEE_Liaison_Officer
The DBE Liaison Officer shall develop, manage and
implement the DEE Program on a day-to-day basis . The Liaison
Officer shall :
- Develop and carry out technical assistance programs
for DBE' s .
- Arrange solicitations , time for the presentation of
bids , quantities , specifications , and delivery
schedules so as to facilitate the participation of
DBE' s . Where such changes are found necessary to
increase DBE utilization , they will be made in con-
sultation and cooperation with the functional unit
involved.
- Provide guidance to DBE' s in overcoming barriers ,
such as inability to obtain bonding or financing.
- Carry out information and communication programs on
contracting opportunities in a timely manner ,
Programs shall be bilingual where appropriate .
- Investigate the services offered by banks owned and
controlled by Disadvantaged Business Enterprises .
- Unless noted elsewhere herein the listing of DBE' s
certified by Caltrans will be utilized. Said listing
is to be made available to all project bidders . Such
listing will include the following information : name,
address , phone number , ethnic and/or sexual ownership,
type of work performed by firm.
- Prior to approval of the substitution ofanyDBE sub-
contractor , the prime contractor will be required to
prove performance of good faith .effbrts to replace the
DEE with another eligi'-ble DEE.
- Establish overall goals for disadvantaged business
enterprises . Goals shall be evaluated annually and
adjusted as necessary , --
- Establish appropriate individual project goals for
disadvantaged business enterprises . All projects
will be evaluated for the appropriatness of goals .
- Perform good faith analysis when project goals are
not achieved.
- Maintain such documentation as is necessary to verify
performance of all activities included in this
program.
IV , Public Notification
1 . At the time of the submittal of this program to the
State Deaprtment of Transportation , a notice in both minority
and majority local media will be published. Said publication
shall include
- The annual overall DBE ctoals .
- Inform the public that the goals and a description of
how they are set are available for public inspection
for a period of 33 days .
- Inform the public that both U. S . DOT and this agency
will accept comments on the goals for 45 ways from
the date of the notice .
- The notice shall advise interested parties that
comments are for information purposes only .
2 . This program will be reaffirmed by public notice
annually at the time of pub'_ication of overall -.oafs . If
substantial changes are made to this document , the entire
document shall! be subject to notification noted in (1) above .
3 . In addition to the foregoing, interested
disadvantaged and minority contractor organizations will
receive direct mailings of this complete program.
V . Establishment of Goals
1 . DBE goals will be established both annually (overall)
and on a per contract basis . The overall goal will be based
on planned contract activity for the coming year . The
overall goal established will be subject to methodology and
procedures established in 49CFR 23, Subparts (C) and (D) and
tai• e effect on October 1st of each year ,
2 . The overall goals established with this _ initial
program is 10"6 DBE; and covers the period of October 1 , 1987
to September "30 , 1988 .
3 . IndividLal project goals will be established for DBE
activity based on the following criteria :
- Attainment of established overall goals .
- Size of project .
- Opportunities for DBE' s as subcontractors , vendors ,
and suppliers .
- Minority population of geographic area in which work
is to be performed.
- DBE goals being utilized in the geographic area by
other State , Federal or local jurisdictions .
- Availability of DBE' s .
- Past experience on projects similar to the project
being evaluated.
- Such other factors as may effect the utilization of
DEE.
- Complete evluation documentation will be retained
for each project .
4 . Projects which do not contain specific goals will
contain the following provisions :
A. "Policy . It is the policy of the City of Atascadero
. that disadvantaged business enterprises as defined in 49 CFR
Part 23 shall have the maximum opportunity to participate in
the performance of contracts financed in whole or in part
with Federal funds under this agreement , Consequently , the
DBE requirements of 49 CFR Part 23 apply to this agreement . "
B. "DBE_ObligatirDn . (i) The recipient or its contractor
agrees to ensure that disadvantaged business enterprises as
defined in 49 CFR 23 have the maximum opportunity to
participate in the performance of contracts and subcontracts
financed in whole or in part with Federal funds provided
under this agreement . In this regard, all recipients or
contractors shall take all necessary and reasonable steps in
accordance with 49 CFR Part 23 to ensure that disadvantaged
business enterprises have tfle maximum opportunity to compete
for and perform contracts . Recipients and their contractors
shall not discriminate on the basis of race , color , national
origin , or sex in the award and performance of DCT-assisted
contracts . "
VI . Contract Procedure
This program shall be implemented through the
utilization of a contract special provision which will be
provided/updated as necessary by Caltrans' Division of Local
Streets and Roads . These procedures- require bidders to
submit the names of DBE subcontractors and suppliers , a
description of the work each is to perform or material to be
furnished, and the dollar value of each DBE subactivity .
• s
VII DBE Notification
Projects will be advertised in 'Local news-pacers and
minority focus newspapers when possible . These ads will
include reference to DBE requirements and c.rill indicate DBE
project goals .
DBE assistance centers will receive notification of
projects scheduled to be advertised . Assistance Centers,
Minority Business Development Centers and Program Management
Centers will be afforded the opportunity to receive
complimentary plans and specifications for projects within
their geographical area of responsibility .
VIII . Selection Criteria_for_Proiects with LOBE Goals
Every project containing DBE goals shall be evaluated by
the DBE Liaison Officer or his/tier designee to ascertain
bidding contractors ' efforts to attain the DBE goals . The
award of any project with DBE goals must be concurred with by
the DBE Liaison Officer or his/her designee before said
contract may be awarded. Should there be disagreement
between functional units concerning contractors' efforts to
attain contract goals for DEE participation , the matter shall
be referred to City Council or his/her designee for final
determination .
Competitors that fail to meet the DBE goats and *ail to
demonstrate sufficient reasonable good faith efforts shall
not be eligible to be awarded the contract .
Any contracts that contain DBE goals , pursuant to this
policy , will be monitored on an ongoing basis by ?protect
personnel during the course of construction . - e: DBE L
T_ iaison
Officer is to be immediately advised of any circumstances
wherein contractor compliance with thee DBE provision is
questionable . The contractor shall submit a final report for
each proj;ct with DEE goals which includes total payments to
the prime contractor as well as payments the prime contractor
has made to DBE subcontractors , vendors and suppliers . If
the report indicates -the pri;ne contractor has not achieved
the project goals , project personnel shall attach an
evaluation , in narrative form, of the reasons for failure to
attain the qoals and any corrective action that was taken .
Prime contractors will be required to notify the Agency
of any situation in which regularly scheduled progress
=t r e 1_10t made l 1.o DBL" e+ i:1 o f L.
c;upplier='
IX . Set-A=ides
If determined necessary by tree DBE Liaison Officer , DBE
:)et-Asides will be consideree a tool to achieve annual
overall goals .
X . Countirn_DBE_Participants
This Agency , its contractors , and subcontractors shall
count DBE participation in accordance with the provisions of
Section 23 .47 , Title 49, of the Code of Federal Regulations .
XI . Records and Reports
1 . The DBE Liaison Officer shall maintain such records ,
and provide such reports , as are necessary to ensure
full compliance with this policy . Such records and
reports shall include, as a minimum, the following
information :
- Awards to DBE' s
- Awards to majority contractors .
- Final project reports concerning DEE utilization
- Such other data as is needed to fully evaluate
compliance with this program.
2 . The DBE Liaison Officer shall submit reports to
Caltrans and/or to the appropriate U. S . DOT element as
required.
These reports will include :
Number and dollar value of contracts awarded.
- Number and dollar value of contracts and sub-
contracts awarded to DBE' s .
- Description of general categories of contracts
awarded to DBE' s .
- The percentage of the dollar value of all
contracts awarded during the year which were
awarded to DBE' s .
indication as to the extent of which the
percentage met or exceeded the overall goals .
- Reports shall be broken down separately by ethnic__
grouping and sex .
n
YII . Complaints
Any complaints received by the Agency concerning this
program will be investigated by the City Manager , He/She will
endeavor to resolve said complaints within 90 days of receipt
by the DEE Liaison officer , The appropriate DoT element and
Caltrans will be furnished a copy of the complaint and may be
invited to participate in the investigation/resolution . The
DoT element and Caltrans will receive a complete
investictative report on the complaint and may he requested
to concur in the proposed disposition of said complaint .
Contractor will be directed to notify the Agency of any
complaints they may receive concerning this program,
• DESCRIPTIOti '` •
TYPE OF WORK
CC21TR.1C T PRO:LCT GOALS
. COST DBE
TRAFFIC SIGNALS Controllor replacement CNLY S100,000
0
leap than 3 to 3'
TRAFFIC SIGNALS w/ Hardware and loops S50,000 10 to 12'
more than
less than 8 to 10
TRAFFIC SIGNALS w/ Any roadwork(islands-access ramp) S100,000 10 to 12
more than
w
STREET LIGHTING / NO OTHER WORK
520,000+ 5 to 8
LANDSCAPING w/ NO OT:XR WORK
$20,000+ S to 8
PAVEMENT HARKING w/ NO OTHER WORK
S20,000+ 5 to 8
• less than 8 to 10
ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION w/ Pavement resur�acing only, no 5150,000
fabric, dig-outs or striping more than 10 to 12
less than
to 12
ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION w/Pavement resurfacing only, with $150,000
i
fabric, dig-out3 and striping more than lI to 13
less than 10 to 12
4
7WAY CONSTRUCTION w/Drainage items 5200,000 12 to 14
more than
- less than IO to 12
ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION w/C.srbs, gutters, sidewalk and Sh 12 to 14.
access rrmps moore re t1:an
less than 12 .to 14,
00
ROAD11AY CONSTRUCTION w/Pavement resurfacing and one of S300 13 13 to 15'
above items
• less than 13 to 15;
ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION w/Pavement resurfacing and two or S300,000 14 to le
• more of the above items more than
less than 12 to 14
ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION w/Pavement reconstruction ONLY S4aO,000
more than 14. to 1.6-
less than 14 to 1�
ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION reconstruction with S500,000 15 to 18
any of above items morn than
• less than 15 to 1Q
ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION w/All new work,-new roadway aligmmnt S500,000 1G to 20
more than
less than 10 to 12 •
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION w/ Roadway apgoach under 100 ft. 5200,000
more than 11 to 13
less than 11 to 13
RIDGE CONSTRUCTION w/Roadway appoach over 100 ft. 5400,000
12 tb 15
more than
i
t
ATTACHMENT "B "
�~ DBE ANNUAL PLAN
TO: CALTRANS DISTRICT 05
Local Streets and Roads Civil Rights Coordinator
The CITY of ATASCADERO
requests approval of annual overall goal of . 10 DBE for
Fiscal Year 1987-8$ beginning on July 1, 1987 and
ending on June 30, 1988
It is anticipated that the following Federal-Aid Highway projects
will be advertised during this Fiscal Year with preliminary DBE
participation levels established as shown. ( Include consultant
preliminary engineering and construction contracts anticipated for
award. )
+'
ESTIMATED
PROJECT CONTRACT DBE
DESCRIPTION ITEMS COST PARTICIPATION TYPE OF I-IORR
Monterey
(1) Road Bridge $ 280,000 $ 28,000 Rr dQe ConGtriirti nn
ycamore
(2) Road Bridge $ 400,000 $ 40,000 Bridge Construction
San Andres
(3) Road Bridge $ no,nnn $ ?5z_Qn Bridge Construction
Garcia Road e Construction
( 4) Bridge $ 150_000 $ 15_nnn Br id g
West Mall
( 5 ) Signal $ 160,000 $ 16,000
GRAND TOTAL $ 1,270,000 $ 127,000
DBE 10 %
Paul M. Sensibaugh 10/1/87
�".:; DBE LIAISON OFFICER DATE
ATTACHMENT "C"
THIS CITY OF ATASCADERO FOR FEDERAL-AID
HIGHWAY PROJECTS HAS SET -AN ANNUAL _GOAL FOR THE 1987-88
FISCAL YEAR OF 10 % FOR DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS
ENTERPRISES (DBE) .
THE GOAL ESTABLISHMENT PROCEDURE WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR
PUBLIC INSPECTION FOR A PERIOD OF 30 DAYS AT CITY HALL
6500 PALMA AVENUE IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE.
COMMENTS ON THESE GOALS WILL BE RECEIVED IN THE ABOVE-
MENTIONED OFFICE AND BY THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION, WASHINGTON, D. C. , FOR A PERIOD OF 45 DAYS
FROM THE DATE OF THIS NOTICE.
Mtg Date: 10/13/87
Item: A-13
•
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: City Council October 13, 1987
VIA: Michael Shelton, City Manager
FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Final Parcel Map 37-86
LOCATION: 7421 Santa Ysabel
APPLICANT: Ted and Judy Young
• On July 14, 1987, the City Council approved Tentative Parcel Map
37-86, subject to certain conditions and in concurrence with the
recommendation of the Planning Commission. The required condi-
tions have been complied with and the final map is recommended
for approval.
HE:ps
cc: Ted and Judy Young
CITY OF EXHIBIT B Site Plan :v-is�
0F `" .L?ERO Tentatixe Pa�.'cel Map 37-SE
7 4 21 Santa `3sabel
` COMMUNITY D`FLOPMENT Califamnla ManOr (Yo.l
DEPARTMENT
1N3Wd013A30 WNt1WW00
If 4
L
eta �W
''•� ��$$ Asa �$��
Sl00 IOaV * ` 1�
3 :$ •W�• � v\ aiEzc
vti
i
c
- err;..•`'}.� i�:~ ��I1
17
P R O C L A M A T I O N
ACKNOWLEDGING OCTOBER 15, 1987 AS
WHITE CANE SAFETY DAY x+.
WHEREAS, the white cane, which every blind citizen of our
city has the right to carry, demonstrates and symbolizes his/her
ability to achieve a full and independent life, and his/her
capability to work producively in competitive employment; and
WHEREAS, the white cane, by allowing every blind person to � Y
move freely and safely from place to place, makes it possible for
him/her to fully participate in and contribute to our society;
and
WHEREAS, every citizen should be aware that the law requires
that motorists exercise appropriate caution when approaching a
blind person carrying a white cane or using a dog guide; and
• ` WHEREAS, California law also calls upon employers, both
public and private,. to be aware of and utilize the employment
skills of our blind citizens by recognizing their worth as
individuals and their productive capacities; and
WHEREAS, the State of California, through its public
agencies, and with the cooperative assistance of the National
Federation of the Blind of California, can look forward to a
continued expansion of employment opportunities for and greater
acceptance of blind persons in the competitive labor market.
THEREFORE, I, Barbara Norris, Mayor of the City of
Atascadero, do hereby proclaim October 15, 1987, -as "WHITE CANE
SAFETY DAY".
BARBARA NORRIS
Mayor
October 13, 1987
�`�;� - �
...A s pal I
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: City Council September 22, 1987
VIA: Michael Shelton, City Manager KA_ _
FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director Vo�,
SUBJECT: Zone Change 11-87
LOCATION: 8485 E1 Corte (Lots l and 2, Block 1, Eaglet #2)
APPLICANT: Initiated by City of Atascadero
REQUEST: To revise the zoning map designation from RMF-4 (PD6) to
RSF-Z.
BACKGROUND:
This re-zoning was initiated by the City Council on July 28, 1987 to
restore pre-existing development rights on property included within an
• adjoining planned development re-zoning.
On September 1, 1987 , the Planning Commission conducted a public hear-
ing on this request, unanimously recommending approval of the zone
change request as outlined in the attached staff report. There was
discussion and public testimony given as reflected in the attached
minutes excerpt.
This item was continued from 9/22/87 Council Meeting due to A ppIicant's inability to attend.
RECOMMENDATION:
Concur with the Planning Commission' s recommendation and (1) read by
title only and (2) approve Ordinance No. 158 for first reading.
HE:ps
ATTACHMENTS: Staff Report - September 1, 1987
Minutes Excerpt - September 1, 1987
Ordinance No. 158
cc: Steven N. Cool _
Hap Brenizer
Ray Bunnell
Steven A. Sweet
City of Atascadero Item: B-2 .
STAFF REPORT
FOR: Planning Commission Meeting Date: 9/1/87
BY: PApSteven L. DeCamp,- Senior Planner File No: ZC 11-87
Project Address: 8485 E1 Corte (Lts. 1 & 2, Blk. 1, Eaglet #2)
SUBJECT:
Request to revise the Zoning Map designation on the subject
property from RMF-4 (PD 6) to RSF-Z.
BACKGROUND:
In May of 1986, the City Council approved General Plan, Zoning
Ordinance, and Zoning Map amendments affecting the subject
property. The project for which the zoning (and Planned
Development Overlay) were designed will not involve these lots.
Because these lots will not benefit from the existing zoning,
reversion to the prior zone designation should be accomplished.
A. SITUATION AND FACTS: •
1. Applicant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .City of Atascadero
2. Site Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 acres
3. Streets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .El Corte is a paved,
City-maintained street
4. Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .RMF-4 (PD 6)
5. General Plan Designation. . . . . . . .Low Density Multiple
family
6. Existing Use. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Lot 1 : SFR and barn
Lot 2: Vacant
7. Environmental Status. . . . . . . . . . . .Negative Declaration
posted August 12, 1987
B. ANALYSIS:
In 1985, the ACOMA Corporation (Bill Poe) approached the City
with a proposal for redevelopment of the old mushroom farm on E1
Corte. The original proposal envisioned the construction of •
seventy-two (72) dwelling units on the flatter portions of the
site, and reservation of the higher elevations in an open-space
Zone Change 11-87
September 1, 1987
Page 2
easement. This plan consisted of approximately twenty-two (22)
acres and included Lots 3 through 10 in Block 1, Eaglet No. 2.
During the process of reviewing this development proposal, the
possibility of adding additional area to the project was
discussed. When the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance amendments
were initiated, the study area was expanded to include two
additional, adjacent lots (Lots 1 and 2) . The study area,
therefore, consisted of thirty-two (32) acres and included all of
the area within the City east of E1 Corte.
At the conclusion of the public hearing process, the General Plan
designation for the property was changed from Low Density Single
Family to Low Density Multiple Family. The zoning on the
property was also changed from RSF-Z to RMF-4 (PD 6) . These
designations provide for a density shift to allow for the
construction of an average of four (4) units per acre on the
lower elevations. The conditions of the Planned Development
over-lay require that all construction on the property be held
below the 960 foot contour line. An open space easement is to be
established above that elevation as a part of future development
review.
Lots 1 and 2, which as noted above were added to the study area,
lie almost entirely above the 960 foot elevation. These lots
are, therefore, virtually undevelopable under the currently
imposed zoning. At the time of the original rezoning to RMF-4
(PD 6) , it was thought that these to lots might become part of
the larger project to the south and would be utilized to increase
the allowable number of units in that project. Because of that,
the requirement for an open-space easement was not considered to
be detrimental. It has now been determined, however, that these
lots will not be part of the mushroom farm redevelopment. For
this reason, the current zoning designation is not appropriate
for these lots.
Prior to the rezoning approved in 1986, Lots 1 and 2 were zoned
RSF-Z, which requires a minimum lot size of between 1.5 and 2. 5
acres depending on the site' s "score" on various performance
standards. This designation was based on the steepness of the
property, the lack of sewer availability, and access conditions.
As part of the larger adjacent project, and given the
restrictions of the Planned Development over-lay, these site -
characteristics were not critical in determining an appropriate
size for these lots. When these lots are viewed individually,
however, those same characteristics are critical in determining
• suitable lot sizes. For this reason, reversion of the zoning for
Lots 1 and 2 to RSF-Z appears most appropriate. This zone
�i
Zone Change 11-87
September 1, 1987
Page 3
designation will allow reasonable development of the property in
keeping with the intent of the General Plan and in conformance
with the general character of the surrounding area.
It should be noted that this currently proposed zone change does
not require a concurrent General Plan amendment. The density of
development that could occur under the RSF-Z zone designation
would not exceed that allowed by the Low Density Multiple Family
General Plan designation. This lower level of density would not
be inconsistent with the General Plan designation. Any future
change in the General Plan can be accommodated as part of the
current General Plan Revision Program.
C. RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of Zone Change 11-87 reverting the zone
designation of Lots 1 and 2 of Block 1, Eaglet No. 2 from RMF-4
(PD 6) to RSF-Z as shown in the attached draft ordinance.
ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A - Location and Zoning Map
Exhibit B - 960 Foot Contour Map
Exhibit C - Staff Report: GP 1C-85 & ZC 3-85
Exhibit D - Draft Ordinance
r C)04151 T A
CITY OF ATASCADERO �o�a��o� �►d za���
191!{ .C? . 197•-7SC D
�OCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Z G I► - $7
DEPARTMENT
�W L�►�.VE" I I � I '
W S ITE
8.1 SS Ef Gov4d,
L* i. 14 Z; elk. I c-_-A Z
I rf
AVr
F--
10
pb \�
a�
V Q
04% ° < ° •°
d--1
J y 6
P /
P
'is99. \vQQr—
Sr
�r
0
CT
�� � EX�tiBiT 6
CITY OF ATASCADERO 940 F--ac+ can- cur
lot 19.E
'�asc�w COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ZG 11 - 67
DEPARTMENT
iTe AV'
940' Gov►-�ouv 1 ��
9 t ``
b 47
A
P
O
Ob, t 0,
bJ''
5.4. IZdloor--: 4? 1 C-95
ZG 3-SS
• City of Atascadero
STAFF REPORT
FOR: Planning Commission Meeting Date: 3/31/86
BY: Steven L. DeCamp, Senior Planner File No: GP 1C-85 and
ZC 3-85
Project Address: 8555 E1 Corte
SUBJECT:
Request to revise the existing General Plan land use map and zoning
map from Low Density Single Family (RSF-Z) to Low Density Multiple
Family (RMF-4) with a Planned Development (PD) overlay.
BACKGROUND:
The applicants are requesting an amendment to both the general plan
land use map and the zoning ordinance text and map from low density
single family to low density multiple family with a planned develop-
ment overlay. This proposal was continued from the last general plan
amendment cycle at the applicant' s request.
Notice of public hearing was published .in the Atascadero News on Fri-
day, March 21, 1986 and all property owners of record located within
300 feet of the subject property were notified on - that March 20, 1986 .
A. LOCATION: 8555 E1 Corte (Lots 1-10 , Block 1, Eaglet No. 2)
B. SITUATION AND FACTS:
1. Request. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .General plan and zoning ordi-
nance from Low Density Single
Family to Low Density Multiple
Family designation.
2. Applicant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .ACOMA Corporation_
3. Site Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .32 acres
4. Streets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .El Corte is a paved (18-20 feet)
City-maintained street
5. Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .RSF-Z (Residential Single Family
1. 5 - 2. 5 acre minimum lot size)
6. Existing Use. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Partially vacant/warehouse
(former Mushroom Farm)
C
General Plan Amendment 1C-85/Zone Change 3-85 (I'O MA Poe
)
7. Adjacent Zoning and Use to. . .North: RSF-Y
Entire Study Area South: Golf course (San Luis
County)
East: Golf course (SLO County)
West: RSF-Y
8. General Plan Designation. . . . .Low Density Single Family
9. Terrain. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Flat at the lower elevations to
steep at higher elevations
10. Environmental Status. . . . . . . . .Negative Declaration
C. ANALYSIS:
The minimum lot size in the RSF-2 zoning district is 1. 5 to 2. 5
acres depending upon the site' s "score" based on various perfor-
mance standards. This zone does not envision the availability of
sanitary sewer service. The proposal for low density multiple
family zoning would more than quadruple allowed densities in the
area. There are, however, factors that tend to mitigate the ef-
fects of this increased level of density.
Surrounding Uses:
The property to the south and to the east of the subject parcels
is the Chalk Mountain Golf Course. This large expanse of open
space will lessen the impact of higher densities on the adjacent
parcels by maintaining low overall area densities.
The parcels to the west of the subject site have been recommended
by the Planning Commission for redesignation to RSF-W (10,000
square foot lots) . Although the RSF-W zone is for single family
lots, the applicant' s proposed RMF-4 zoning designation would
result in similar overall densities (4 units/acre) . The property
would not, therefore, be an island of higher density surrounded
by low density uses.
Site Design:
The applicant is proposing a planned residential development em-
bodying significant areas of open space. The applicant has pro-
posed, and an open space easement will assure, that the upper por-
tion of the slopes on the site will remain open. Building heights
and location on the site will be controlled to the same end. Each
of these considerations will lessen the visual impacts.
Public Services:
Sanitary sewer service is currently available to only one of the
parcels proposed for redesignation. the entire site .is, however, -
within the Urban Service Line and could be annexed to the sewer
district. Because of the terrain on and surrounding the site, and
the number of dwelling units possible, the developer will be re-
quired to provide off-site sewer system improvements. These im- •
provements will be designed as part of the master plan of develop-
ment for the site.
2
General Plan Amendmet 1C-85/Zone Change 3-85 (AMA/Poe)
Access to the site from E1 Camino Real via La Linia Avenue, Cas-
cada Road and/or Arcade Road is of concern to staff. Each of
these roads is paved but narrow. Traffic flows are currently
light and adequate capacity exits for some additional development.
The cumulative impact of this project and others approved in sur-
rounding areas must be considered, however . The recommended re-
designation of adjacent areas for 10 , 000 square foot lots could
result in an excess of eighty-five (85) new lots. Not all of
these potential new lots would impact the roads mentioned here,
but when added to the seventy-two (72) dwelling units proposed by
the applicant in the RMF-4 zone, impacts could be of concern.
This issue could be addressed by requiring a master plan of devel-
opment with appropriate offsite improvement requirements identi-
fied and imposed. These may include, but not be limited to,
street, drainage, and sewer system improvements.
A related issue to that discussed above is the question of access
from this site and surrounding areas onto E1 Camino Real. Traffic
generated by build-out of the area between El Camino Real and the
golf course could trigger the need for a traffic signal at one of
the side streets and El Camino Real. This site ' s contribution to
future traffic loads will be identified in a circulation proposed
to be completed as part of the master plan of development prior to
building permit applications. Appropriate fees will be levied
prior to the eventual issuance of building permits.
A redesignation of the affected property to low density multiple
family would allow for development that appears to be appropriate
for the site. The preparation of a master plan of development
will provide an opportunity to assure design which is suitable for
the neighborhood and which assures that the development contrib=
utes its fair share to necessary neighborhood improvements.
D. RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of General Plan Amendment 1C-85 and Zone
Change 3-85 based on the findings contained in Exhibits E and F.
SLD:ps
ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A - Location Map
Exhibit B - Existing General Plan Map
Exhibit C - Existing Zoning Map
Exhibit D - Site Plan
Exhibit E - Draft Resolution
Exhibit F - Draft Ordinance
Exhibit G- - Supplemental Statement
3
WE
�..iil
V.HIM w
•a`�'
� t � ,RV�lll�f�A •q i�agp ��-Y I,� ��
a. 'C.I ♦• •ice - i � �
�� • �{101 , ,. !1► ������
not
1511
WWAFA
�I/I��IIe'�� ► visa'—�.
� .oils
ILI, w 1
® ®�•.;�� /fid` � �
s
,, ri•
` • EXHIBIT C
EXISTING ZONING MAP
�09
- ribs. ba •�y � S. � ! \ �'�'•�v
' ''....' '°e ♦:e
' �J• a•I.r1 ''' C^^�
•,01 _ ° r
Is eT,bti^ •`yet rw
r
ei)
s,'• ��,r '., ''b SITE
`JQO,P,I:rJO c ,,.', tr.d. • e''14 � ' 3-85
?0 8555 EL CORTE
�� S�%S?yy' ryfJ, •ice•• by d� .�1,
.+1 ;tom•y �\ .•yti
♦ 1�A
i
VF
to
5 1-
4 4
ee• IK r,•° 'L. ,•�p.n^ .� .1.r rro a '.
f,I,�Y'"' '.S e�Ne � • \ 4 •"P��, ��/ • r4''1C+,:,, !+ i o •
e1ce, ..r Vit+' \Oa` I-y..r � '•.y .•+,`x ++ .
', i-A ✓„y ia, `_` rra:2 fief,' � �t e�6N' ^`i. j•. +-r'.
�i f�.11� e.n\ .� qq��•+
e 1'`� '+Yp CMU _
1�
• r ca) 7rfm +tu .N'26
11 i w
SSG + tlir•i�' �++„t• X11 .IS s1
_\ - ♦�. •3 F7� ra; •1 1 S. ...28 _ t rJ S ,\b $.'b 1 ., .
• +�Z� a '4' • :;CK
.�•'•j r'30- .' \ i
•2 :. 3+Yi+^ +wu �. 1 �7jr�m `'r nis 30 �e r,+! ri •h
to
31
% ►3o gat
ts-
. VS ,w ,\,.• '�.e i-J/ +mss !�
• u°$ .. � 16 yr •'~ f• 7L� '.W \ .. ^�.
)' .. •Cc+ �}+° :^-• e+,
• 15S f�o q• I- 'o JIB - 'L i• +.+h ` n[f +d a•J ♦` rJ
3 IL
CD
_ -
- ot-+[ {,xS< 1++'i s - •+J �f,� -.'' ` yJ° ..,,t. t• Jr'.� -9 +�'r ����.
fir•' 10•s i Ib S 2t ..1 r ° i°% .O•r \' °i•�,,),t �'4 •`� b �J
_CIOs
•-, �r•K r. r �'r,$r a ''f° +�� `-I'',. �,S pYa
•+lp O �I
ret•_ r ,. t3 __ .d 3:t'. V1 •'' n .`
I i t �.►+as���r• t
•� o•. ��-f�\�� � LLL
r :s
4/9
41
-�
E nl
. :fir`• .:, + � `�
if
_ I
Exhibit G
General Plan Amendment and Zone Change RSY-Z to RSY-POD 4
8555 E1 Corte Road
i
Adult Plan Unit Development: The idea of this project is to provide
an alternative environment for active adults.
Designed by Barry Berkus AIA, founder and president of Berkus Group
Architects, a national firm of architects and planners with headquarters
in Santa Barbara, Newport Beach, and Washington D.C.
Lifestyle is the key word for this planned unit development,- a--
retiree who doesn't feel like retiring. The idea for this project was
taken from his Leisure Village Ocean Hills, the 1985 Gold Nugget Award
of Merit for the best low density development. The site plan was
cautiously laid out to take advantage-of the views of -Chalk Mountain
Golf Course and the distant Santa Lucia Range, yet it doesn't impose
on the hillside. Using open space and a height limitation (approximately
960') means almost 65% of this development will be landscaped, common
area or open space.
With the abandonment of La Linia and a stucco wall along E1 Corte,
. the development creates its own environment within. One entrance and
cart access to the golf course helps to accentuate this. This is the
same effect Berkus created with Leisure Village. The Spanish style
stucco and tile roofs make one think of a small Mediterranean hillside
village.
This project will be a compliment to the neighborhood and a welcome
addition to one of Atascadero's most beautiful assets, Chalk Mountain
Golf Course.
THIS PROJECT IS PRESENTED BY
ACOMA CORPORATION
Bill Poe
President
EXHIBIT D
• 0
ORDINANCE NO. 158
AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ATASCADERO AMENDING SECTION MAP NUMBER
19 OF THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAPS OF THE CITY
OF ATASCADERO BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY AT
8485 EL CORTE FROM RMF-4 (PD6) (RESIDENTIAL
MULTIFAMILY (PD6) ) TO RSF-Z (RESIDENTIAL SINGLE
FAMILY, 1. 5 - 2. 5 ACRE MINIMUM)
(ZONE CHANGE 11-87 : 8485 EL CORTE)
WHEREAS, the proposed zoning map amendment is consistent with the
General Plan as required by Section 65860 of the California Government
Code; and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendment is in conformance with Section
65800 et seq. of the California Government Code concerning zoning reg-
ulations; and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendment will not have a significant ad-
verse impact upon the environment. The Negative Declaration prepared
for the project is adequate; and
WHEREAS, the Atascadero Planning Commission held a public hearing
on September 1, 1987 and has recommended approval of Zone Change i
11-87.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Atascadero does ordain
as follows:
Section 1. Council Findings.
1. The proposal is compatible with the surrounding land use and
zoning.
2. The proposal is consistent with the General Plan.
3. The proposal will not result in any significant adverse en-
vironmental impacts. The Negative Declaration prepared for
the project is adequate.
Section 2. Zoning Map.
Map Number 19 of the Official Zoning Maps of the City of Atasca-
dero on file in the City Community Development Department is hereby
amended to reclassify the area shown on the attached Exhibit "A"" from
RMF-4 (PD6) (Residential Multiple Family) to RSF-Z (Residential Single
Family, 1. 5 - 2. 5 acre minimum) .
1
0
Ordinance No. 158
Section 3. Publication.
The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published once
within fifteen (15) days after its passage in the Atascadero News, a
newspaper of general circulation, printed, published, and circulated
in the City in accordance with Section 36933 of the Government Code;
shall certify the adopting and posting of this ordinance and shall
cause this ordinance and this certification together with proof of
posting to be entered into the Book of Ordinances of this City.
Section 4. Effective Date.
This ordinance shall go into effect and be in full force and ef-
fect at 12:01 a.m. on the 31st day after its passage.
On motion by and seconded by
the motion was approved by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
DATE ADOPTED:
By:
BARBARA NORRIS, Mayor
City of Atascadero, California
ATTEST:
BOYD C. SHARITZ, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
MICHAEL SHELTON, City Manager
A OV AS 0 FORM:
J F G. J GE EN, City Attorney
R ARE B
HENRY ENG-E _
Community EtvelopmeODirector
2
�, .,.. ,�.. . CITY OF ATASCADERO �Yd ,�ar►�� se
,�-4,s q -- . 197 -7
-1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Z.o�� Gtia►�y� ! ( —
�, DEPARTMENT
•yam � ESP,. a9�`(<'
E L
pVE I J1T�
J i
9W,r---4 +0
- P — ,\\� Z�►1�c. GkaKja, 11-8-7 1
vE
AV
i
Fc app
i
cz
p a �'A.
? tS F=kl
n F� LAO
464� `\ /10O �\
a
0&1
P /
V Coz
��F � ! � 14,
4�F
CT C.
/�.P7 N,
Minutes - Planning Commission - September 1, 1987
Mr. DeCamp ed that the applicant as submitted revised plans
and are works with staff to his regard. He asked that this
matter be continue o the Com ssion meeting of September 15,
1987 in order for ff o complete its final review on these
revised plans.
MOTION: Made by Co ssioner Hat 11, seconded by Commissioner
Cope-Laind carried unanimou to continue the hearing
on G eral Plan Amendment 2C- nd Zone Change 6-87 to
Sep mber 15, 1987.
2. Zone Change 11-87:
Request initiated by the City of Atascadero to revert the
existing zone designation of RMF-4 (PD6) - Residential Multi-
ple Family (Planned Development #6) to the prior designation
of RSF-Z - Residential Single Family, 1. 5 - 2. 5 acre minimum
lot size. Subject site is located at 8485 El Corte in the
City of Atascadero, legal description being Lots l and 2;
Block 1 of Eaglet Tract #2.
Mr. DeCamp, presented the staff report and provided a background
on the previous general plan amendment and zoning change approvals
which took place in May, 1986. It was noted that since the sub-
ject lots are not a part of the planned development, reversion to
the prior zoning designation is in order.
In response to question from Commissioner Hatchell, Mr. DeCamp
explained how the subject lots (1 and 2) came to be included
within the original project. Mr . DeCamp answered several ques-
tions for the Commission and it was noted that staff has been
working with the applicant on a specific development plan for the
remaining portions of the site (lots 3 through 10) .
Steve Cool, attorney from Arroyo Grande and speaking for Don Rob-
inson, owner of Lot 2, concurred with staff ' s background analysis.
He clarified that there was never any type of agreement between
Mr. Robinson and ACOMA Corporation relating to sale of the proper-
ty or including it within an overall development. He asked " the
Commission for approval of a zoning designation that would allow
two units per acre (or a maximum 10 units for the 5 acre lot) .
Hap Brenizer from Grover City, speaking on behalf of Mr. Robinson,
pointed out that Lots 1 and 2 were added to the PD just prior to
the Commission' s approval of the project, and spoke about his
understanding of what steps took place -at the =March 31, 1986
Commission meeting (minutes excerpts were distributed to the Com-
mission) . s
Mr . DeCamp clarified that staff' s understanding at the time of
review of the project was that Lots 1 and 2 could be included with
the remaining portions of the project and that they would be dev-
eloped under the same PD6 zoning (which would allow for no "devel-
opment above the 960 foot elevation) . Mr. DeCamp emphasized that
the revision to the study area that included Lots 1 and 2 along
2
Minutes - Planning Commission - September 1, 1987 -
with Lots 3 through 10 was made approximately 6 to 9 months prior
to the Commission' s action approving the zone change (Lots 1 and 2
were not added to the project a matter of weeks before the Commis-
sion hearing as implied by Mr . Brenizer) .
Mr. Engen added that the owner of Lot 1 was notified of the new
zone change application.
In response to question from Commissioner Hatchell, Mr. Engen
explained that a meeting was held with staff and Mr. Robinson, et
al, concerning the feasibility of development with this PD zoning.
It was their general consensus that Lots 1 and 2 are not needed
for the development of the property. This proposed reversion back
to the original zoning was initiated by the City Council after
considering Mr. Cool' s request for higher density. Two units per
acre is too dense for this steep property.
Mr. DeCamp pointed out that staff has now instituted a policy
change of requiring each property owner to sign an application
when there is a PD involved. Commissioner Michielssen concurred
with this.
Commissioner Bond spoke on his recollection of the March 31, 1986
meeting and noted that he would not have a problem with reverting
back to the original RSF-Z zoning. 0
MOTION: Made by Commissioner Bond, seconded by Commissioner
Lopez-Balbontin and carried on a 7 :0 roll call vote to
recommend approval of Zone Change 11-87 as outlined in
the staff report.
3. Ten tive Parcel Ma 23-87:
Reque initiated by Tom Vaughan to allpow subdivision of
10.55 res into two lots containing ap roximately 5. 2 acres
each. Sub 'ect site is located at 116"05 San Marcos Road;
legal descr ' tion being Lot 2 Block 80 in Atascadero
Colony.
Mr. DeCamp presented th staff rep t on this land division re-
quest recommending conditi nal a roval. He emphasized that staff
could not recommend that thi ite ever be further subdivided
given the site' s geology and tic suitability.
Tom Vaughan, applicant, poke in support of the request and
stated that in addit' n to the geo gic study that was prepared,
Dr . Chipping (prepar of geologic r ort) indicated that the
development of t access road would tabilize an old existing
slide. He added hat the driveway into bot sites would be under
12%.
Commissone Hatche11 asked for clarification on t location for _
the prop ed access road. Discussion followed.
3
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: City Council October 13 , 1987
VIA: Michael Shelton, City Manager N&I •
FROM*DIenry Engen, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: General Plan Amendment 2C-87 and Zone Change 6-87
LOCATION: 9300 El Bordo
APPLICANT: . L.D. McCaslin and Richard Hawkins
REQUEST: To revise the existing General Plan Land Use Map designa-
tion from Low Density Single Family to High Density Multi-
ple Family, and to revise the existing RSF-Z zoning to
RMF16 (PD-7) .
BACKGROUND:
The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing of this matter at
. its July 21st, August 18th, and September 15th, 1987 meetings, and
recommended approval of General Plan 2C-87 and Zone Change 6-87.
Under present zoning, the applicant could construct one house on each
of two, one acre non-conforming lots of record. The applicants' orig-
inal request was for a General Plan change leading to a planned devel-
opment rezoning to permit a 24 unit small lot subdivision. The Plan-
ning Commission requested and approved a 16 lot re-design.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:
Approval of Resolution No-. 105-87 and (1) reading by title only of
Ordinance No. 159 and (2) approval of Ordinance No. 159 for first
reading.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Denial based on the findings of Exhibit E contained in the July 21,
1987 staff report.
HE:ps
Enclosures: Staff Report - July 21, 1987 y
Staff Report - September 15, 1987
Resolution No. 105-87
Ordinance No. 159
Minutes Excerpts - Planning Commission Hearings
cc: L.D. McCaslin
Richard Hawkins
Item: B-1
Meeting Date: 9/15/87
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Planning Commission DATE: Sept. 15,1987
FROM: Joel Moses, Associate Planne
SUBJECT: General Plan Amendment GP. 2C- 7 and Zone Change ZC:6-87
9300 E1 Bordo Road (McCaslin/Hawkins)
BACKGROUND;
At its July 21, 1987 meeting the Planning Commission held a Public
Hearing concerning the proposed above referenced General Plan
and Zone Change. The Planning Commission directed that the
applicant prepare a revised development plan for the PD Overlay
showing a maximum density of 8 units per acre. The applicant has
now submitted the revised site plan (Exhibit B) . Staff has
prepared the appropriate resolution and draft ordinance (Exhibit
E & F ) to enable action to approve.
n has reduced the density The proposed site plan y as the Planning
Commission has requested, Staff has reviewed the plans for
conformity to the City' s Zoning ordinance. As per the original
submittal the project is requesting a reduced lot size. Proposed
lots would vary from 3,000 to 3,560 square feet in size. The
plan proposes to continue the concept of zero lot line setbacks
for some side yards. The site meets the required parking standard
of 1 stall per residential lot for lots less than 4,000 square
feet (Sec. 9-4. 118 (c) 5) . The applicant has in reality exceeded the
requirement by providing a total of 38 stalls where 16 would be
required. Other setback modifications are also being requested in
the form of what would normally be the front yard setback. The
Zoning Ordinance allows for flag lots to select which yard will
be the front yard and thus the required 25 '-0" setback (Sec. 9-
4 . 106 (a) 2) . In most cases depending on the final lot line
configuration the 25'-0" is not provided or accessory buildings
are located in those yards.
The proposal now contains several amenities for the residents.
These include a common open space area, an outdoor basketball
hoop and a spa. Staff has only one concern with the amenities.
The spa is located in the middle of the drive area.
The staff in reviewing, the project still feel that the area is
one that should be considered for higher density than is
currently allowed. The City is presently in the process of
considering the over all land use pattern of the City and
undoubtedly this area would have been and will be considered when
public hearings are held on the new Land Use Element. The use of
the Planned Development Overlay as noted is suppose to be in
response to a specific development plan that will benefit the
community as a whole. In the case of this project the only
benefit being derived is that of possibly providing lower cost
homes.Staff does not believe that the special findings required
by the Zoning Ordinance for the establishment of a Planned
Development Overlay can be made.
RECOMMENDATION:
Based on the new proposal and the findings contained in Exhibit E
of the previous Staff Report dated July 21 , 1987 the staff
recommends denial of General Plan Amendment GP:2C-87 and Zone
Change ZC: 6-87
EXHIBIT A - Location Map
EXHIBIT B - Site Plan
EXHIBIT C - General Plan Map
EXHIBIT D - Staff Report (Date July 21, 1987)
EXHIBIT E - General Plan Resolution
EXHIBIT F - Draft Ordinance
JM:jm
CITY�F ATASC '
�'_; •� ��y� ADERO EXHIBIT A - LOCATION MAP
CAD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT G.P. AMENDMENT GP : 2A-
DEPARTMENT ZONE CHANGE ZC: 3-87
9300 El Bordo Road
SITE 9300 El Bordo Road
Low .Den. Sing. Family to
_ High Den. Multi Family &
d �. RSF-Z to RMF/16 (PD-7)
M . cP o
W \ \
7
f --;R F
o EC ,i O \�
- p0 4p' - \\ 06,00
b \�
Q` \ ` p9
F� I J i v NZ `\lig P.
CR
AVE CT T
CT
a i
ti
t ' J
c /.
/r
, C R _ ,
i 4 r4
V �
.a
O
O� CYC
s0 �4i i% ZE�p4K`
h /
..N VIEW
T
RIVE u
CO
L v /0
� � • EXHIBIT B SITE PLAN
CITY OF ATASCADERO G•P•AMENDMENT GP:2A-87
ZONE CHANGE ZC: 03-87
cwf COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 9300 E1 Bordo Road
-jc?. DEPARTMENT McCaslin/Hawkins
W
co
O
y I Lu
W
Ca
Lu
a
W
A
CLD
W
crLn
az t
W.J J
IL Lu �(` CDS,
.%i 1
1.
cc
j m
11 z
Lu
24
>I "• : :; ill! � - �iD .f � "� _
i
� 1 �
Ids I
- p
II
I
t
CITY OF ATASCADERO EXHIBIT C Gen. Plan.Map
_ 1
tl'' • G.P. Amendment GP: 2A-87
`S� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Zone Change ZC: 3-87
x`'501 9300 El Bordo Road
DEPARTMENT Mc,Casli.n/Hawkins
s _r, SITE 9300 E1 Bordo Road i
' Low Density Single Fam.
.' •: ;�;:-,_, ,;_�-->y „•, TO High Densit MultiFam.
Wit` >• ;� .� \�.�_ -.,-`I j.
\/ X.
{•••!
ew
'' -:3::': •lir ::. ::�' ..........:::::::
..........•.
.. ::::::::::::::::::::::.. G 0
..... „ A An ::::i e. nnnO � 0r; 000
o ATASCADERO
) 00
GENERAL PLAN MAP
(7LAND USE AND CIRCULATION
HIGH DENS. MOLT. FAM. HEAVY COMMERCIAL AGRICULTURE '
(€�(( LOW DENS. MULT. FAM. i' 1 RETAIL COMMERCIAL RECREATION
HIGH DENS. SNGL. FAM. COMMERCIAL PARK SPECIAL RECREATION
"- MOD.DENS. SNGL. FAM. SPECIAL COMMERCIAL ARTERIAL DIVIDED
LOW DENS. SNGL.FAM. :: PROFESSIONAL OFFICE `� �- ARTERIAL UNDIVIDED
" COLLECTORS
SUBURBAN SNGL FAM. INDUSTRIAL PARK URBAN SERVICES LINE
PUBLIC INDUSTRIAL URBAN RESERVE LINE
CITY BOUNDARY
City of Atascadero Item: B-3
STAFF REPORT
FOR: Planning Commission Meeting Date: July 21, 1987
August 18, 1987
BY: Joel Moses, Associate Planner File No: GP: 2C-87
ZC: 6-87
Project Address: 9300 E1 Bordo Road (Lots A&B of PM 5-1; Ptn Lot
39 ADS Addn No. 1)
SUBJECT:
General Plan Amendment GP: 2C-87 to revise the existing General Plan
Land Use Map designation from Low Density Single Family ( 1 1/2 to 2
1/2 acre minimum lot size) to High Density Multiple Family (Maximum
16 units/acre) , and coinciding Zone Change ZC: 6-87 to revise the ex-
isting RSF-Z zoning to RMF/16 (PD-7) for 2 acres of land at 9300 E1
Bordo Road.
A. SITUATION AND FACTS:
1. Request. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .To revise the existing General
Plan Land Use Designation from
Low Density Single Family to
High Density Multiple Family
and the current zoning from
RSF-Z to RMF-16 (PD-7) allowing
for a small lot subdivision of
24 lots on 2 acres and for a
zero lot line setback on some
sideyards and a reduced front
front yard setback.
2. Applicant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .L.D. McCaslin/Richard Hawkins
3. Site Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 acres
4. Streets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .El Bordo Road-45 foot Collector
5. General Plan Designation. . . . .Low Density Single Family (1 1/2
to 2 1/2 acre minimum lot size)
6. Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .RSF-Z (Residential Single Family
1 1/2 to 2 1/2 acre minimum lot
size dependent on specific lot
criteria
Staff Report - GP 2C-87/ZC 6-87
Page Two
7. Adjacent Zoning and Use. . . . . .North: RSF-Z - Vacant
to Entire Study Area South: RMF/16 - Mobile Home
Park
East: RSF-Z - Single Family
West: RSF-Z - Church
8. Terrain. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Sloping 10 - 15% up from
E1 Bordo
9. Environmental Status. . . . . . . . .Proposed Negative Declaration
B. ANALYSIS:
As noted, the applicants' proposal is to modify the existing Gen-
eral Plan Land Use designation from Low Density Single Family Res-
idential ( 1 1/2 to 2 1/2 acre minimum lot size) to High Density
Multi-family (maximum 16 units per acre) . The coinciding Zone
Change is not only asking to revise the RSF-Z (Residential Single
Family 1 1/2 to 2 1/2 depending on site criteria) to RMF/16 (Resi-
dential Multiple Family 16 units per acre) , but proposes a Planned
Development Overlay (P.D.-7) . The main purpose of the P.D. over-
lay, is to modify the minimum lot size from 1/2 acre to 2,600
square feet. The Overlay will also allow for the modification ..,, of
minimum side yard set back from 5 ' 0" to 0 to allow for common
wall development and modification of minimum distances required
for curb cuts. These last items are more site design specific as
opposed to the overall land use discussion needed for the question
of lot size and density modification.
The applicant has based his request on specific points as listed
in his development statement (Exhibit D) . These, in the staff' s
opinion, can be boiled down to several points. To provide reason-
able priced housing, proximity to more intensive uses, and to use
as a buffer between differing land use densities as per General
Plan Policies. These items, in the applicant' s opinion would pro-
vide the City with redeeming features to compensate for the re-
quested modifications of the ordinance and constitute a need for
the increased density.
The staff has reviewed the proposal with the applicants several -
times, and concur with several of the applicants' assertions.
The staff has concured with the concept of a higher density_- along .
E1 Bordo due to the street' s designation of a collector and its
use as an access to the golf course and regional park. But the
question of using the maximum density in the City would seem too
high. The City, in the interim of the application and this re-
Staff Report - GP: 2C-87/ZC: 6-87
Page Three
view, has revised the maximum allowed density per the Multifamily
Slope Standards. This would set the maximum density allowed under
the zoning of 24 units (based on 0-10% slope - 2 bedroom units 12
units per acre) not the 32 units (based on 16 units per acre) .
This would effectively reduce the overall density to an acceptable
level per the Zoning Ordinance evaluation of the site. staff
feels that the density proposed is still too high. This is re-
flected in the minimum lot size proposed of 2, 600 square feet.
In examining the surrounding land use pattern, the site would seem
to be a logical extension for the higher density uses as a buffer.
This general area was reviewed in two prior General Plan Amendment
requests. These requests were along Los Lomas to the west of the
proposed site. Both were denied, not based on land use, but based
on lack of sewer and the visual impact from a change of density on
the side of Chalk Mountain. The applicant, in this case, is not
on a highly visable area of Chalk Mountain (Exhibit C) . Sewer
services have been reviewed for the site and are engineeringly
feasible, but annexation to the sewer district has not been com-
pleted.
The approval of small lot developments has previously been re-
viewed by the City. The use of small lots could reduce the cost
of housing but what other benefits to the community, in this spe-
cific case, would occur. The staff notes that in two prior PD
Overlay areas, the City benefited by the clustering of units and
the provision of substantial open space (Poe on E1 Corte and Yeo-
mans on the end of El Bordo) . In the design of this proposal, no
provisions for amenities are made. The site is to small to pro-
vide greater amenities. Staff has discussed the possibility of
the sale of development rights to this developer by the owners of
property on the top and sides of Chalk Mountain. In doing so, the
potential development on a highly visable area would be eliminated
in favor of a higher density in another area not so sensitive to
the community' s image, while transfering density as opposed to
expanding densities.
The proposed site design is requesting some modifications of the
normal physical development standards required by the Zoning Ord-
inance (Exhibit B) . The site plan proposes zero side lot lines,
and a reduction in the required distances between curb cuts (ac-
cess drives) . In reviewing these modifications, staff sees few
problems. The use of zero lot line setbacks is common in many -
other cities and counties. The practice allows for side yards
that are normally a wasted part of property to be eliminated. The
use of joint driveways, eliminating required distances for curb
cuts, present no real problems. Overall, the staff would also
find that the project would conform to the City' s Appearance Re-
view Manual.
•
Staff Report - GP: 2C-87/ZC: 6-87
Page Four
In responses from outside agencies, no major problems were noted.
Utilities can be provided to the site by the Atascadero Mutual
Water Company, Pacific Gas and Electric and Southern California
Gas. Of course appropriate easements will be needed at the time
of development. The Fire Department noted the need to comply with
Fire Codes and the development of fire supression facilities (fire
hydrants) at the time of development. The Building Division indi-
cated a need for apppropriate soils reports and compliance to the
Uniform Building Code and State Regulations.
In summary, the staff would find that no real redeeming features,
save reduced housing costs, are being provided. The reduced den-
sity on this site could be a logical extension to existing land
use patterns in the area. The area will undoubtedly be reviewed
under the current General Plan rewrite. The requested modifica-
tions to development standards would be a benefit to this type of
project that the existing development standards do not provide
for.
C. RECOMMENDATION:
Based on the Analysis and Findings, staff recommends denial of
General Plan Amendment GP: 2A-87 and Zone Change ZC: 3-87.
JM:ph
Attachments: Exhibit A - Location Map
Exhibit B - Site Plan
Exhibit C - Section
Exhibit D — Development Statement
Exhibit E - Finding for Denial
CITYA ATASCADERO EXHIBIT A - LOCATION MAP
r MBIA��C � , � IY]■-�
`fi'ArasCAD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT G.P. AMENDMENT GP : 2A-87
DEPARTMENT ZONE CHANGE zC: 3-87
9300 E1 Bordo Road
SITE 9300 El Bordo Road
Low .Den. Sing. Family to
_ High Den. Multi Family &
RSF-Z to RMF/16 (PD-7)
M (PD }�
7
n EL .4 1 p ♦`
oar♦
moo' � ^ �o c// ♦ `�`� %� �i
a�
��, C NZ ♦ v QP
Pr I r v ♦ y
°�J
H O
�? Sic°� ♦..� Z_� ` �.♦
/ cP COs m,
/ ♦\ 9s 4 l`
-
_ R >�
CR
/ CT
(` T J i
V/7
r ; CR
45C4QEq OPS �' !•
P
_ P /
4 \
VE� e�\
V
cc
OI IRCCE�
sD
i IVF 1
i
VIEW
1
RIVE
o L C CO oQa /
�F LAIU� �. RS
o s
CITY OF ATASCADERO EXHIBIT B — SITE PLAN
p�ascan COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT G.P. AMENDMENT GP : 2A
DEPARTMENT ZONE CHANGE ZC: 3-87
9300 El Bordo Road
(McCaslin/Hawkins)
,nnSv77V!'tl
- f -
tll
of
; lit
¢Q�+a ss�sal3
W _ •m a _
Wim,
ROO
QO
ZM I•i. . _ }.. y_l. i
- - J-- R
W ZLu
`"• �,
® m m
fF c
cc
Ego
J
cc
cc
W
J
�; .... CITY OF ATASCADERO EXHIBIT C - SECTION
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT G.P. AMENDMENT GP:2A-87
ZONE CHANGE ZC: 3-87
DEPARTMENT 9300 E1 Bordo Road
(McCaslin/Hawkins)
y'-=Y
> �
QLu
oO.>uj
Q M
Z
Lu
IL W a
8 a i
W
0
Q
a
0z F- j
0 --
w
1— 4 ...i Lu U
w+ll'dad --
N y
i
TY CI OF ATASCADERO EXHIBIT D - DEV, STATEMENT
�19'a'I'1� ^' 197" - G.P. AMENDMENT GP: 2A- 7
AT C`1D COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ZONE CHANGE ZC 3--87
DEPARTMENT 9300 EL BORDO ROAD
NCV-10, 1986
1.. D Mc!A.SL1N, DICK MWKINS
BEI'n.,R II V'Ef), 10205 EL
PLANNING COMMISSION CAMINU ".L. VIAS. CA 93422
CITY OF RTAS. .
ATSACADERO CA
RE PROPOSED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ON EL BORDO AVE
ATAS. CA 93422
y.
DEAR COR IONERS
IN VIEW OF THE CURRENT PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY IN 'DIE AREA Uf' 'FHL: NTASCADE:RU
REGIONAL PARK AND GOLF COURSE, WE FIELL IT IS AT THIS APPROPRINIE TIME: 'IC) I'UT F)vni A
PIAN TO CREATE A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDr'N17AL PLANNED DEVI-10 .-'�T OR' m_ Bomm AVE.
TM IDEAL IS TO Gy-ATE SMALL IDIS OUT OF LARGF JI7TS,TEIIS WAY WE WILL BE AR11: TO PRODUCE
.,
A REASONABLE COST PER H(7,!E,THE SURROUNDING CITY HAS BE114 USII,Y; 111IS APPRGAC11 FOR SOME
TIME,AND IT IS WORKING.' QUITE WEIL,THESE ARE: INDIVIDUAL LOT EnR HOMES IKi"I' CbMbS.
THIS PR TF-,*T IS CENTRALLY LOCATED- NEAR THE GOLF (IDURSE, SHOPPING CFN'M, SCHOOL.
AS YOU ARE UNDOUBTEDLY AWARE THE SURRON-DING AERA IS CURR04ILY DEVE'L,OPEU WI111 HIGH
DENSITY MU-11 FAMILY RLNIA UNITS.IT IS OUR FEE LPiG TfINT ASINGLE FAMILY PRoa-c.I' NJ-THIS �7!
LOCATION WOULD PROVIDE A PLEASING AND EUNCTIONAI. BUFFER LEADING 'In TETE GOLF C(-X1R5E AND }''
RECREATIONAL AREAS JUST TO TFC T
FAST OF OUR SITE.. IN ADDITION, OUR THINKING W)ULD TARGET
2IIF5E AFFORDABLE HCX`ivS SITES TWORD RETI;y'RD PERSONS WHO WUULI) BE AB1.I: 10 TAKEiilftl ADVANTAGE
OF THE RE:1tFATI(hYAL A�,D 0�.M SERVICE FirILI'IIFS, WI'IN MINIMUM INPAC.0 ON VL'111C(1!.AlZ
CIRaJLATION IN THE. AE-RA. THE SITE IS C aN=GUOUS WITH WIIII 271E EXISTING C;i'I.Y :iLXJ1s� llISTRICT"' ,
AND A FORMAL APPLICATION FCR AL'NTNCN1'10N TO 'IEEE DIS'I'RiCT 'iAS BEEN LNI"NIT ) WI-111 '1.11E CITY
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARIYTNT. WE SENCEI2LY HOPE YOU Lr'II1 OONSII)E;t OUR REp11!1S* I ult A C,h:V(:RAL
PLAN AAifND`xrZ%T AT THIS TIME, ANIS WE LOOK FORWARD 'I'7 D:IS(:USSI%'G 'II!;S !'1t(11h,C!' W1711 ntL:
COMISSION IN FUR11fR DETAIL AT YOUR NEY.T MEF-71NG.
ItFSl'F.CI'E''1i_I Y -
L D Nk C SLiN
EXHIBIT E - Findings for Denial
GP: 2C-87/ZC: 6-87 (mcClasin/Hawkins)
July 21, 1987
1. Modification of development standards and processing require-
ments is not warranted to promote orderly and harmonious devel-
opment.
2. Modification of development standards and processing require-
ments will not enhance the opportunity to best utilize special
characteristics of an area and will not have a beneficial effect
on the area.
3. Benefits derived from the overlay zone cannot be reasonably
achieved through existing development standards or processing
requirements.
4. Proposed plans offer no redeeming features to compensate for re-
quested modifications.
5. The proposed revision would not be in conformance with the Gen-
eral Plan policies.
RESOLUTION NO. 105-87
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY' OF
ATASCADERO APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
TO AMEND THE LAND USE MAP OF THE LAND USE ELEMENT
OF THE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN (GP 2A-87 : MCCASLIN/HAWKINS)
WHEREAS, the City of Atascadero has grown considerably since in-
corporation; and
WHEREAS, the City' s General Plan, which was prepared in the 1970 ' s
and adopted in 1980 to guide the City' s general growth is in need of
updating; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero
conducted a public hearing on subject matter on July 21, 1987 and Sep-
tember 15, 1987; and
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65356 provides that a general
plan be amended by the adoption of a resolution; and
WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Atascadero finds as follows:
1. The proposed general plan amendment recommended by the Plan-
ning Commission is consistent with the goals and policies of
the General Plan.
2. The proposed general plan amendment will not have a signifi-
cant adverse effect on the environment. The Negative Decla-
ration prepared for the project is adequate.
THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Atascadero does resolve to
approve General Plan Amendment GP 2A-87 as follows:
1. Amendment to the General Plan Land Use Element, Land Use Map
as shown on the attached Exhibit "A" .
On motion by and seconded by
, the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its
entirety by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
DATE ADOPTED:
Resolution No. 105-87
CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA
BARBARA NORRIS, Mayor
ATTEST:
BOYD C. SHARITZ, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
MICHAEL SHELT , City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
JEFFREY G. JORGENSEN, City Attorney
PREPARED BY:
HENRY ENGEN,
Community Development Director
EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION
�� ��'�'d�. • • : '• • . �,� CITY OF ATASCADERO GENERAL
PLAN APZENDMENT
1a7.� GP:2A-8 7
`s "ascan COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 9300 El Bordo Road
DEPARTMENT McCaslin/Hawkins
�•. ) ,
SITE 9300 E1 Bo rdo
:
Road
Low Den.Sing.Fam. TO
^�..:.,,,.,,-�,' -),� ;•,<<, � High Density Multi Family
•,•:
'1 I ' -
Ift
\• ^Y ..
'
���:... ...... .
. 0 4 0 Q 0 4 4
:: •• 0004QC9444 004 :1:
Q 0 4 0 4 0 4 4 4
.... .. ;, r. 040 • 0G0 Q0444 .004 Q..p. .
OATASCADERO
7 00
M L GENERAL PLAN MAP °
LAND USE AND CIRCULATION
X. HIGH DENS. MULT. FAM. HEAVY COMMERCIAL r�'r;'���,
AGRICULTURE
JJIIfI{ LOW DENS. MULT. FAM. RETAIL COMMERCIAL RECREATION
HIGH DENS. SNGL. FAM. COMMERCIAL PARK SPECIAL RECREATION
MOD.DENS. SNGL. FAM. SPECIAL COMMERCIAL ARTERIAL DIVIDED
LOW DENS. SNGL.FAM. PROFESSIONAL OFFICE •` ARTERIAL UNDIVIDED
TORS
SUBURBAN SNGL. FAM. INDUSTRIAL PARK •••• •••••••• ••• URBANSERVICESLINE
PUBLIC INDUSTRIAL URBAN RESERVE LINE
16 CITY BOUNDARY
ORDINANCE NO. 159
AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ATASCADERO AMENDING SECTION MAP NUMBER 19 OF
OFFICIAL ZONING MAPS OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO BY
REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY AT 9300 EL BORDO FROM
RSF-Z (RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY) TO RMF/16 (PD-7)
(RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY 16 UNITS PER ACRE WITH A
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY) (ZC 3-87 MCCASLIN/HAWKINS)
WHEREAS, the proposed zoning map amendment is consistent with the
General Plan as required by Section 65860 of the California Government
Code; and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendment is in conformance with Section
65800 et seq. of the California Government Code concerning zoning reg-
ulations; and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendment will not have a significant ad-
verse effect upon the environment, and preparation of an environmental
impact report is not necessary; and
WHEREAS, the Atascadero Planning Commission held a public hearing
on September 15, 1987., and has recommended approval of Zone Change
3-87.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Atascadero does ordain
as follows:
Section 1. Council Findings.
1. The proposal is compatible with the surrounding land use and
zoning.
2. The proposal is consistent with the General Plan land use
element and other elements contained in the General Plan.
3. The proposal will not result in any significant adverse envi-
ronmental impacts, and preparation of an environmental impact
report is not necessary.
Section 2. Zoning Map Change.
Map Number 19 of the Official Zoning Maps of the City of Atasca-
dero on file in the City Community Development Department is hereby
amended to reclassify Lots A and B of PM 5-1; Portion Lot 39, ADS Adn.
No. 1 as shown on attached Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B" which are here-
by made a part of this ordinance by reference.
Ordinance No. 159
Section 3. Publication.
The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published once
within fifteen (15) days after its passage in the Atascadero News, a
newspaper of general circulation, printed, published and circulated in
this City in accordance with Government Code Section 36933 ; shall cer-
tify the adoption of this ordinance; and shall cause this ordinance
and certification to be entered in the Book of Ordinances of this
City.
Section 4. Effective Date.
This ordinance shall go into effect and be in full force and ef-
fect at 12:01 a.m. on the thirty-first (31st) day after its passage. ..._. .
On motion by and seconded by
, the foregoing ordinance is hereby adopted in its en-
tirety by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
DATE ADOPTED:
CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA
BARBARA NORRIS, Mayor
ATTEST:
BOYD C. SHARITZ, City Clerk
0 Ordinance No. 159
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
MICHAEL SHELTO;14, City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
JEFFREY G. JORGENSEN, City Attorney
PREPARED BY:
HENRY ENGEN,
Community Development Director
R
L-21,l'•ti
v ,lo"+{ J�Q •����.�.�� •�/ t ..r�� r, x' nT-eo•sr fz.
'.CS 'Ga\`�' \�r, ` 4'`�•' ,�•. .,v, 1• 3 AT-78.135
s \ •� • , '-S('t\ •� N.•/ AT-T8.113 !
)+ °� Ow •• .• 'L1`'s �\ G,� AT-79'13 12-61
+ ) `1.90 v \.�• .;� \,'� '3 \ AT-81-183 '.12-61
'• d r�,pp !'f ° �''+�
is .\ , ,•`. _.� AT- 81 256 54Z6f
\�• ra•e �,\08{1' •rjr r V. �\ ' _ e4•P 9
{r• .SYO' ° 4\\�'� ,•Z �l 4J :n� ,•\..>° �'�\/ " •4°'165 w9,a °e'' T
°�G+ Iss• ' /elf `.V,� •",S` ` REVISION DATE
RAF-�° "A •' i'� Y-=r}; ''$ SITE 9300 El Bordo
Zone Change ZC: 03-87 RSF-Z
cog ;2 -�;" .� -.� -•'_ (Res.Sing.F am. ) To RMF 16
•'� .d 1%' t qy+ i,ss ,• ,rte J t' /
\p`� •,. •�;. a•- , z, ,\, 6• _ (P.D.-7) (Res•Mult.Fam.Plan
' '`'"�`° "- e35 i- Dev Overlay)
• a7°A` a ,•�lpa ;° ;��., Ott,. SF=Y1._
• orf •�. °• •' ,� 3.nee r6YS,t e� -
• �� 3• 3 rs. �+� 2. se��ts,y�. U
J.•i w• C�' •.b•. 4•tep ML ' Lr
174-1 ell
I� f
34 ro Osi co 7 377�foo •n, ' ,• `'.y\
4, o /�, �•� i .mac °'o .,. Is � � _ ,
IJ Y 9F Ir 28 I•J
, `;;+.yZ•.f• • e._�}D �� ��ra ,
h 531,3i• II,' ±`�_ 1'nv flRSF
`.4 am 10CT
'JG s .• µt v.• 1
13 .. 1 .•�;\ obi :. .
ople7 ,)03 �JI6 .d \,••. �n •,c• a ly 3�fi.I�• J`.... .•
fes•...v I PO _ 't� 9• ,•.t>° ro �S ''t;•'r'+
7
s•' '. .- lass. \ �.. o• .�•�%� s %G. 2`
' '. v ,�•,r .. �`'&•a�, .' ;. 2 ,�v° ,,, •;, . .;.RMF/
- �-ro , A 'e ..J�.•. � ap1•• '�I .\ mar ,
_ = ,\a '' �n•a, �`. e. '�� S � .\�;,
y _ . 1 y•A a ,�Y-'°p, a .<�,s' .e '�f•�•3,l 'li �,r 1.! '`�' _
.. 4 �a:` 10•A R Ib° -p.!1, ' e RM >' •!. ^e �` '
' °-� ..,c r. � ��rvs'+g' • \�e °per'°" ,',,' `�T° O
//�///�/
. /• ^.,c� 12 0,`\ '° r�� IMV��A:k '��I.�IL�,` 4y
r
b: 27 y....a Jt) '7'Crv�.•!'19i-ro+,i` /;"�_?.-rte. ^ s• °• �''
ljy at .r.
. •�' .\ RSA- y 22 . . s. l..•..r-ILillass•• u. ..,I•Iw..•.a
......
r _'• 21 _ R -- i�+wa� 'e..✓,.{+_innN t,w:•,r w.rvu w.
20QVi. - vfn?q�.i.<s„trera•aow'tiA K a.+l..•.
a «r•c 27 rIZA 1•°s••j^. Is.>...•.,... w....
^ -� �71h,its �i�A^•
•arc [/_
�� � .�, •,j ,s,e' :. yy_uua aur.• u.T.I,..�t... ,.. ,.r/.t1a
* � �-+--�__ ` 2�,=!\ a J r'-..,�/�..c M.`I�. 1-r.1: 1..�?s ice:..t•����
•"' ie +�,' 4 CITY OF ATASCA
EXHIBIT A ORD. 159
ri
ZONE CHANGE ZC: 03-87
:�-{i�►�� lr'�i=:� �:�Il' � l! 9300 E1 Bordo
McCaslin/Hawkins
��+ CI EXHIBIT B ORD 159
7 .I . . 11:IL TY OF ATASCADERO
191 r ZONE CHANGE ZC s 03-87
9300 El Bordo
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT McCaslin/Hawkins
DEPARTMENT
z
W
p , W o
• � � - N 5 [[E3 - � � W
ge c' S CCCC i CCC{ wit !� W
Lu•� �+rrrrr- ,.�" e�
W
o
J
uiC
¢O z
- / 7,
U /� - ��i// •� W J
Cc
1' a
O
-
atat
i I Wti ,
iii
E
Minutes - Planning Commission- September 15, 1987 Item: A. 1
MINUTES - ATASCADERO PLANNING COMMISSION
Regular Meeting
Tuesday, September 15, 1987 7:30 p.m.
The egular meeting of the Atascadero Plannin Commission was
called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Chairman Nolan, fol wed by the Pledge
of Allegia ce led by Commissioner Michielssen.
ROLL CALL:
Present: Commissioners Kidwell, Michielssen Bond, Copelan, Lopez-
Balbonti (present 7:33 p.m. ) , an Chairman Nolan
Absent: Commissione Hatchell (Excused)
Staff Present: Henry gen, Communi Development Director; Joel
Moses, As ociate Plan er ; Paul Sensibaugh, Director of
Public Wor and Pa ricia Shepphard, Administrative
Secretary I
A. CONSENT CALENDAR
1. Approval of minutes of the a ular Planning Commission meet-
ing ing of September , 1987
2. Approval of min tes of the spec al Planning Commissin meeting
of June 30, 19 7
3. Lot Line Ad ' stment 14-87 : Request itiated by Frank At-
kinson (T n Cities Engineering) to djust the property line
between t o existing lots of record. ubject site is located
at 8000 ella Vista; legal description ing Lot 4 , Block 14 ,
Atascad ro Colony, and Parcel 2 of PM CO 7-145.
Mr. Engen oted the following correction to Ite A-1: Page 1,
(under endment to minutes of August 18, 1987) The motion was
to nomi ate Commissioner Nolan (not Bond) for Chair n.
MOTIO Made by Commissioner Bond, seconded by Commis ioner
Michielssen and carried unanimously to approve he Con-
sent Calendar with the above noted amendment to tem A-1.
B. HEARINGS, APPEARANCES, AND REPORTS
1. General Plan Amendment 2C-87 and Zone Change 6-87 :
Request initiated by L.D. McCaslin/Richard Hawkins to revise
the existing General Plan land use map designation from Low
Density Single Family to High Density Multiple Family and
1
i •
Minutes - Planning Commission - September 15, 1987
coinciding zone change to revise the existing RSF-Z zoning to
RMF/16 (PD-7) . Subject site is located at 9300 E1 Bordo (CON-
TINUED FROM MEETINGS OF JULY 21, AUGUST 18, .AND SEPTEMBER 1,
1987) .
(Commissioner Lopez-Balbontin is now present - 7:33 p.m. )
Mr. Moses presented the staff report summarizing the background
involved with the previous hearings. It was noted that the re-
vised site plan has -reduced the density of the previous proposal;
however; staff is recommending denial as it does not believe that
the special findings required by the Zoning Ordinance for the es-
tablishment of a Planned Development Overlay can be made. Mr.
Moses pointed out that this area will be more closely reviewed
during the General Plan update. He responded to questions from
the Commission.
Mac McCaslin, applicant, spoke in support of the revised proposal
pointing out the various amenities which have been added. In re-
sponse to question from Commissioner Lopez-Balbontin, Mr. McCaslin
explained the time frames involved with preparing this proposal
for approval and did not feel comfortable with this matter being
delayed until such time as this area is reviewed overall for the
General Plan update.
Commissioner Bond noted his concurrence with the revised site plan
which reduced density as had been previously requested by the Com-
mission (16 units instead of 24) ; Commissioner Kidwell agreed and
felt this proposal was an attractive concept.
There was some discussion by the Commission concerning the -new
density standards and how they would affect this particular prop-
erty. Mr. Engen advised that an 8 fold increase in permitted den-
sity was being sought.
In response to question from Chairman Nolan, Mr. Engen replied
this item was not previously reviewed by the Traffic Committee but
had been reviewed by the Public Works Department.
Commissioner Michielssen felt that the density for- this area prob-
ably would not change even after two years.
MOTION: Made by Commissioner Bond, seconded by Commissioner
Kidwell and carried 6 :0 on a roll call vote to recommend
approval of General Plan Amendment 2C-87 and Zone Change
6-87.
Commissioner -Copelan commented on the proposed location for the
spa and felt this is something that can be worked oUt between the
developer and staff at time of the development proposal.
2
Minutes - Planning Commission - July 21, 1987
(5) foot sidewalk and AC pave-out al g property
frontage. "
1118-b. (for Principal Avenue) - Limits: Thirty (30)
feet from centerline to curbface
1118-d. (for Las Lomas Avenue) - Lim' s: Thirty (30)
feet from centerline to curb ace. . . . "
1118- (for Montecito) - Twenty 0) feet from center-
line to curbface. . . . "
"21. Ob in encroachment per t from. . . . . . . .Sign an In-
spec ion Agreement a a Curb, Gutter, and Im-
rove nt Agreement, uaranteeing. . . . . . "
2. Road Abandonment 1-
Request initiated by ar s Gray to allow vacation of a por-
tion of Curbaril Avenue Subject site is located at 9404
Curbaril.
Mr. Davidson presented th staff eport pointing out that this
road vacation was a s mmary or 'short-form" type of vacation in
that adoption of a sep ate resolut n of intent is not necessary.
Charles Gray, applic nt, spoke in supp t of the request noting le
his intent to b ld a storage buildi g on the site if the road
vacation is appro ed.
There was some iscussion among the Commi ion concerning -the
status of t e land once the vacation is ac omplished, how this
surplus prop rty would be sold and that a lot m ger could be re-
corded sim taneously with the sale of the surplu property.
MOTION: Made by Commissioner Nolan, seconded by ommissioner
Michielssen . and carried on a 6 :0 vote to r ommend that
Road Abandonment 1-87 is in conformance with t e General
Plan and not suitable as a non-motorized tran ortation
facility, as well as that the sale of this land s sur-
plus City property is also in conformance with the en-
eral Plan.
3. General Plan Amendment 2C-87/Zone Change 6-87 :
Request iitiated by L.D. McCaslin/Richard Hawkins to revise
the existing General Plan land use- map designation from Low
Density Single Family to High Density Multiple Family and
coinciding zone change to revise the existing RSF-Z zoning to
RMF/16 (PD7) . Subject site is located at 9300 E1 Bordo Road. .
Mr. Moses presented the staff report recommending _denial of the
request as presented.
In response to question from Commissioner Michielssen, Mr. Moses
3
Minutes - Planning Commission - July 21, 1987
responded that an appropriate density given the characteristics of
the site would be a possible reduction of two units on either site
(more appropriately 8 units for each site) . Mr. .Engen added that
this might be best determined in looking at the whole neighborhood
as part of the General Plan update.
Mac McCaslin, applicant, referred to the site map and showed all
of the multi-family housing along E1 Bordo. He explained the
benefits of the proposed project. He responded to questions from
the Commission concerning the design aspects of the project.
Commissioner Kidwell stated she would like to see a density de-
crease occur on the approach to the golf course. She would be
comfortable with an 8 unit development (on each acre) . Chairman
Bond concurred.
There was discussion among the Commission concerning multi-family
zoning for the site even though the project is proposed to be
single family in nature, as well as discussion on the planned
development overlay.
MOTION: Made by Commissioner Kidwell to recommend approval of
General Plan Amendment 2C-87 and Zone Change 6-87 but to
recommend approval of a revised zoning to RMF(PD7) allow-
ing for small lot subdivision of 8 units per acre.
Steve noted that the motion should also include directing staff
to prepare appropriate findings and language to reflect the re-
vision of the zoning. Discussion ensued as to the intent of the
RMF(PD7) zoning as opposed to RMF (PD10) zoning.
Commissioner Kidwell withdrew her original motion and
made a new motion to recommend approval of General Plan
Amendment 6-87 and to direct staff to bring back findings
for approval of an RMF/10 zoning for Zone Change 6-87.
The motion carried 6: 0 with a roll call vote.
4. Ge ral Plan Amendment 2B-87/Zone Change 5-8 .
Reque initiated by Don Messer (Cuesta E ineering) to re-
vise th existing General Plan land u map designation from
SuburbanSi a Family to Moderate D sity Single Family with
a coinciding z e change to revis he existing RS zoning to
RSF-Y. Applica 'on include a request to extend the Urban
Services Line. Subj t site s located at 8430 Santa Rosa
Road.
Mr. Davidson presented th staff r rt recommending approval of
the applications.
Deborah Hollowel ith Cuesta Engineering, r resenting the appli-
cant, spoke in upport of the request noting s had no comments
on the matt
4
I
• M E M O R A N D U M
TO: City Council October 13, 1987
VIA: Michael Shelton, City Manager
FROV Henry Engen, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Zone Change 12-87
LOCATION: 8750 E1 Camino Real
APPLICANT: Sandra L. Genzone
REQUEST: To revise .the existing IP (Industrial Park) zone desig-
nation to CS (Commercial Service) on approximately .75
acres of vacant land.
BACKGROUND:
• The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing of this matter at
its September 15, 1987 meeting, and recommended approval of Zone
Change 12-87 based on the Findings contained in Exhibit E of the at-
tached staff report.
Sandra Genzone, applicant, appeared and indicated her agreement with
the recommendation.
No one else spoke on the matter.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approval of Zone Change 12-87 and (1) reading by title only of Ordi-
nance No. 161; and (2) approval of Ordinance No. 161 for first
reading.
HE:ph
Enclosures: Staff Report - September 15, 1987
Ordinance No. 161
cc: Sandra Genzone
CITY OF ATASCADERO Item: B-2
STAFF REPORT
FOR: Planning Commission Meeting Date: 15 Sept 87
BY: Joel Moses, Associate Planner File No: ZC: 12-87
SUBJECT:
Zone Change Application ZC: 12-87 initiated by Sandy Genzone to
revise the existing IP (Industrial Park) zoning on approximately
. 75 acres of an existing 1.2 acre site to CS (Commercial Service)
at 8750 E1 Camino Real.
BACKGROUND:
In 1983, when the City rezoned the entire community, this site
was reviewed specifically due to the splitting of the property
with a zone line. The Commission and Council noted at that time
the General plan for the area as being split in half with
Industrial Park to the rear, and the street frontage as
Commercial Service.Staff also noted at that time the problem of
splitting ownerships with zoning and not following existing
property lines. The property' s zoning was approved with the
zoning line splitting the property. It was understood that the •
property would probably request a rezoning of part of the site
when a specific site development was settled on. The new owners
of the site now desire to develop the site as a Motel/Hotel but
the re-zoning of the rear half of the site will be needed to
allow development of the entire site. The IP (Industrial Park)
zone does not allow the development of Hotel/Motels, thus the
rezoning is needed at this time.
A. SITUATION AND FACTS:
1. Applicant. . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . .T & M Medeiros & S & S
Genzone
2. Representative. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Sandra Genzone
3. Project Address. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8750 E1 Camino Real
4. Legal Description. . .. . . . . . .Ptn Lot 3 Blk 7 At.Col.
5. Site Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Approximately . 75 acres
6. Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .IP (Industrial Park) _
7. General Plan Designation. . . . . Industrial Park
•
Zone Change ZC: 12-87
September 15, 1987
Page 2
8. Existing Use. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Vacant (front portion
of lot is developed but
is not part of the re-
zoning)
9. Environmental Status. . . . . . . . .Negative Declaration posted 8/31/87
B. ANALYSIS:
In evaluating the proposed rezoning staff has reviewed the
proposal in light of the problems created by the split zoning on
the site. Under normal circumstances the splitting of a lot by
zone districts is not appropriate. The Zoning Ordinance as a part
of its rules of interpretation
(Sec. 9-109 (c) l) directs that " Where a boundary is shown as_
approximately following a lot line, the lot line shall be
considered to be the boundary " . This is used to prevent
what has occurred in this case. The site is split by zones
that allow different uses on the two portions of the site.
The applicant wishes to develop a motel/hotel on the site.
The site plan for the motel/hotel is not being reviewed for
approval at this time. The front portion of the site, zoned
CS (Commercial Service) , lists the use as an allowed use
(Sec. 9-3. 232 (a) ) .The rear of the site is designated as IP
(Industrial Park) and motel/hotel is not a listed use either as
allowed or by conditional use permit. The developer is thus left
with a site that in some situations can be only partially
developed with a single use.
The City' s General Plan presently shows the area with two
potential land use designations (Exhibit C) . As in the
Zoning the front portion of the site is designated as Heavy
Commercial and the rear of the site as Industrial Park. As
discussed earlier the approval of the site' s present zoning
was based on this mapping on the General Plan' s Land Use -
Map. At that time concern was expressed as to the ultimate
use of the site and a developer' s need at a future date to
revise the zoning to conform to a proposed development plan.
The General Plan has policies that allow for the
interpretation of the map on a wavy line principle. This is
based on the fact that the General plan is not a specific
diagram, but a general one (Policy 9 Land Use Policy
Proposals) . This would allow the finding that the proposal
is in conformance with the General Plan.
The revision will change the list of uses that could be
developed on the portion of the site affected. The IP
(Industrial Park) zone is meant to provide areas for large
lot light industrial development. The CS (Commercial
Service) zone is meant to provide large lot service
Zone Change ZC: 12-87
September 15,1987
Page 3
commercial development. Reviewing the lists of uses
allowed and conditionally allowed in the zoning districts
shows the exclusion in the CS zone of more intense uses
while the IP zone allows for what might be considered less
intense uses (Exhibit D) .
Comments have been received from outside agencies that note
no problem with the proposed zone change. Comments did
note the need for improvements at the time of development. .
These improvements would include but are not limited to
improvements for drainage, street development, and traffic
signalization. These items would be addressed as conditions
of approval of a specific plan for development of the site.
C. RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of Zone Change Application ZC: 12-
87 based on the findings contained in Exhibit E.
ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A - Location Map
Exhibit B - Proposed Site Plan
Exhibit C - General Plan Map
Exhibit D - Zoning Matrix
Exhibit E - Draft Ordinance
JM:jm
CI EXHIBIT A LOCATION MAP
OF ATASCADERO
�a►sc�w COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ZONE CHANGE ZC; 12-87
DEPARTMENT 8750 EL CAMINO REAL
IP to CS (GENZONE)
,W
f
SITE 8750 EL CAMINO REAL ,'
ZC: 12-87
INDUSTRIAL PARK TO
$d
COMM. SERVICE
M SPD
F= tkm
cx
\ o
' > A
P( I r)v P O a • \\ �O� P�
a "XO
CO
JP �
9s 4 -
sr°�4�
41
CR CT,
i c
4$ 4
OPPO \
4 � �
i M
"lQ4Ni.
EXHIBIT B PROP.SITE PLAN
CITY OF A
v1; . ■ .■ ■ � TASCADERO ZONE .CHANGE ZC: 12-87
�-s9 ■e_■ s■ 8750 E1 Camino Real
Gd,n 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT IP to CS (Genzone)
DEPARTMENT
L I C
o
r _
RE
4 - j
• � 0 EX
CITY HIBIT C GEN.PLAN MAP
tl� 1 OF ATASCADERO
ZONE CHANGE zc: 12-87
re91 c 197 8750 E1 Camino Real
`s COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT IP to CS (Genzone)
i
';��';� ;, .�1 •• .. SITE 8750 El Camino Real I
Zone Change ZC:12-8 7
IP to CS
:•:�; _i':,- .,fit•r_',"\": _t t -l.l.
.r: •��r lam'. ..'\"1 ti, -„),-\
`
ai•
• ' •/�” ..
o ATASCADERO
M GENERAL PLANT MAP
LAND USE AND CIRCULATION
HIGH DENS. MULT. FAM. HEAVY COMMERCIAL n'n AGRICULTURE
LOW DENS. MULT. FAM. ;ii;: RETAIL COMMERCIAL RECREATION
HIGH DENS. SNGL. FAM. COMMERCIAL PARK SPECIAL RECREATION
MOD.DENS. SNGL. FAM. SPECIAL COMMERCIAL- ARTERIAL DIVIDED
LOW DENS. SNGL.FAM. PROFESSIONAL OFFICEARTERIAL UNDIVIDED
COLLECTORS
SUBURBAN SNGL. FAM. INDUSTRIAL PARK — — —•—•—•—•- URBAN SERVICES LINE
PUBLIC VZ0A INDUSTRIAL URBAN RESERVE LINE
CITY BOUNDARY
i
CITY OF ATA SCADEROA-AL LOSVABLE! C-CONDIT IONAL
ZONING MATRIX JUNE 27, 1983 . .S-SUBORDINATE -. H-HISTORICAL
*SPECIAL CONDITION,.-
Ar ,
.o:LAND'.USE
ONDITION :"^LAND' USE
TIRS RSF LSF RMF CN CP 'CR CS CT CPK IP I. L LS P.
:Accessory, Storage A A A A A A A A A A A JAA A A
: .Agrlcu tura , A A A A
:.
Accessory
Agricu tural A CC A
Processing
.' Amusement C C C A A C
v
.. Animal Hospitals Hospitals A -C C A
�Appare andA A I A
.Finished .Products C*
-: epic e. Dealers A C A
and Supplies
Auto Repair i I C A S A A A
And Services
Bed and Breakfast C C C C 11A A, A A S C A A
Broadcasting H H H JH A A A A JA JA
Studios
;I.Building Materials A* A A A A
and Hardware C*
Business Support H H H H A* A* A A A A C
Services
Caretaker C C C C C C C C C C C C C C A
Residence
. Cemetarles _ C C A
Chemical Products C C C
Churches ;-and C C C C C C -
Related Activities
Co lection
A A A A A A A A = A .. A A , A A A A A
Stations
`Concrete, Gypsum, & 7
C C A
Plaster Products -
Contract Constr- A A A A
tion. services
::Crop? rod.uc.tion A C A
and Grazing
Eat!ng , and::'; - A* A A A JA S C C
Dr inking:.P.laces C*
Electronic an Sclen A* A A A
tific Instruments . C*
Farm Animal A iA A C A j
Raising .
Farm Equipment A A . A Y A A
Land Supplies
Farm Labor Quarters A
Financial A A A S
Services
Fisheries and C A C
Game Preserves
EXHIBIT D ZONING MATRIX
ZONE CHANGE ZC:12-87
8750 E1 Camino Real
IP to CS (Genzone) i
LAND USE A RS RSF LSF [RMFFCN CP CR CS CT CPK IP I L LS P
Food'.and,;Beverage A* A* A A S S C
Ill
Retail Sales C* C*
Food and A
IC I A JA A A
ll I
: Kindred Products
!. Forestry,. A C A A
Fuel and A A A A A
Ice Dealers
Funeral Services A A
Furniture. and . :.
Fixtures C*
Furniture,:;, Furn- A* A A S
ishins' & Equipment C*
General Merchandise A* A* A A S S S C
Stores C* C*
Glass >Products C C C A
Health Care A S A
Services
- Home Occupation A A JA A 11A A
Horticultural A A* A A A A C
Specialties C*
Hotels, '-Motels - A AA C
. Indoor- Recreation C C S A C
Services
Kennel A C C 1C A
Laundries. .and A A JA A
�; °Dr y Cleaning'- Plants
Libraries,.',Museums H H H H A A A A I JA A A
'A _A7- Al
- , lglt; epa r
Services
Livestock . A C
Specialties
Lumber and C C A
Wood Products
ac finery C C A
Manufacturing
Mail Order A JA A A
and Vending11
Membership A A A
Organizations
.-..'Metal Industries/ C
Primary
Mining (&Surface) C C
Mobilehome C C C C
Development
Mobilehome A A A A
Dwelling
Mu tip e Family A
Dwelling
ices H H H H A A A S S A
Organization C C C C
Houses
2
LAND USE: A S RSF _LSF RMF CN TPC CS CT CPK IP I L LS P
..Outdoor. Recreation C C A I JA C
4 Paper.-Products G C Al
r`Paving :Materials C C A
' Personal H H H A* A* A A S S
Services C* C*
Petroleum C
Extraction
Petroleum `Refining C
& Related Industry
tPipellnes A* * C C C C C C C C C C. C C, C A
+; C
Plastics and . , C C ICI
Rubber -Products
rimary Family A
. Housing
' Public Assembly I C C A C C A
V and Entertainment
{ ecrea t Iona I A C C
Vehicle Parks
Recycling and C C C
Scrap
Residential A A A A IA A
Accessory Uses
.. Residential A A A
Care, ' * C* C*
Retirement HotelC A A
Roadside-.Stands FA A A A A A
=,Rura - Sports & - CA C . a
Group- Facilities
,...Sales Lots A A C 'A A A
Schools. - Business H H H H A A A C C A
and Vocational
rSChoOlS C C C C ,A A A A A A
Service Stations C C C A
..Single Family A A A A A A
Dwelling
.Skilled Nursing A* A* A* A A A A
Facilities C* C* C* '
mal Scale A A A A A
Manufacturing
Social & Service A A A A
`' Or anizations
;Sports Assembly C C JA C
Stone & Cut A* A A A
Stone Products C* _
Storage Yards A JA JA
._Structural Clay & G C A
Related Products- _
. Temporary Dwelling A A A A A A
,Temporary Events A_ A A A A A A A A A A A
Temporary Offices AtA
A A
Temporary or A A A AA A A __ JAIA
A A A
Seasonal Sales
LAND USE A RS RS LSFRMF CN CP CR CS CT CPK IP I L LSP
.Textile Mills - C C C
Transit Stations C C A C C C C A
and Terminals
Utility Service A A A A
Centers
Utility. Trans- AIA 1A . A A A A A A A A A A A A A
mission Facilities _ _
Vehicle and C C C C
Freight'Terminals
Vehicle and A A A A A
"E ui ment Stora ge
Warehousin C C A A
Wholesaling and A . A A A�
.''Distribution
ZONING DESCRIPTIONS
:A - AGRICULTURE ZONE
RS - RESIDENTIAL SUBURBAN ZONE
.RSF - .RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY ZONE
:.';,LSF - LIMITED RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONE
-RMF - RESIDENTIAL MULTIPLE FAMILY ZONE
CN - COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD ZONE
`CP.. COMMERCIAL PROFESSIONAL ZONE
CR COMMERCIAL RETAIL ZONE
CS - COMMERCIAL SERVICE ZONE I
:__CT COMMERCIAL TOURIST ZONE .
:;CPK COMMERCIAL :PARK ZONE
IP INDUSTRIAL PARK ZONE
vI INDUSTRIAL ZONE
L.: RECREATION ZONE
LS - SPECIAL RECREATION ZONE
�P PUBLIC ZONE
4
• 0
ORDINANCE NO. 161
AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ATASCADERO AMENDING SECTION MAP NUMBER 19 OF
OFFICIAL ZONING MAPS OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO
BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY AT 8750 EL CAMINO REAL
FROM IP (INDUSTRIAL PARK) TO CS (COMMERCIAL
SERVICE) (ZC 12-87: GENZONE)
WHEREAS, the proposed zoning map amendment is consistent with the
General Plan as required by Section 65860 of the California Government
Code; and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendment is in conformance with Section
65800 et seq. of the California Government Code concerning zoning reg-
ulations; and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendment will not have a significant ad-
verse impact upon the environment. The Negative Declaration prepared
for the project is adequate; and
WHEREAS, the Atascadero Planning Commission held a public hearing
on September 15, 1987 and has recommended approval of Zone Change
12-87.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Atascadero does ordain
as follows:
Section 1. Council Findings.
1. The proposal is compatible with the surrounding land use and
zoning.
2. The proposal is consistent with the General Plan land use
element and other elements contained in the General Plan, and
specifically, policies pertaining to the "wavy line" concept
expressed in the General Plan land use element.
3. The proposal will not result in any significant adverse en-
vironmental impacts. The Negative Declaration prepared for
the project is adequate.
Section 2. Zoning Map.
Map Number 19 of the Official Zoning Maps of the City of Atasca-
dero on file in the City Community Development Department is hereby
amended to reclassify Portion of Lot 3 of Block 7 of the Atascadero
Colony as shown on attached Exhibit "A" which is hereby made a part of
this ordinance by reference.
•
ORDINANCE NO. 161
Section 3. Publication.
The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published once
within fifteen (15) days after its passage in the Atascadero News, a
newspaper of general circulation, printed, published, and circulated
in the City in accordance with Section 36933 of the Government Code;
shall certify the adopting and posting of this ordinance and shall
cause this ordinance and this certification together with proof of
posting to be entered into the Book of Ordinances of this City.
Section 4. Effective Date.
This ordinance shall go into effect and be in full force and ef-
fect at 12: 01 a.m. on the 31st day after its passage.
.On motion by and seconded by
the motion was approved by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
DATE ADOPTED:
By:
BARBARA NORRIS, Mayor
City of Atascadero, California
ATTEST:
BOYD C. SHARITZ, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
MICHAEL aSHELTO , City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
JEFFREY G. JORGENSEN, City Attorney _
PREPARED BY:
HENRY ENGEN,
Community Development Director --
'. . t..- .S � ,`�ePO.ir L• i '• V•},,��:. .�i► �a/ t=. :sire t.,I c M� rR*+p 7Rn�w rr4 t}3 TJi�' ::/SY 60•ST '•1Z� �I
,�r/H�2[t- ♦M• t l •,t. �Sr •'.�`r 't+ •�` �F'•��'�r.r •i 1' �V..Z ,r Y .t�' i
'S.. t•r�i -7 -13T
` 1 e�Av �� ^,.,�'i• ' v yr:•, :�S rxe ..' .:, ' t{ t ' 1 > :j.
AT-76.113 t
rr ei 'o v ' 'y 1• \\ •y, y.. AT-19.23. 12-a1'
•�' Tit a Ser •� a,a,r \. ••dr ci� +ti�5 S 'AT'81-183 .12-0[
• +:
=/:: •. r•p �/'. • •!!L7 t '•` y a, ,� r"r .:�, .�'\
AT-81 2Siex
1... • e � ti • , � •r r S•iS
t IH r��G •�it•yi 1 sy ,ri, (� * S .7i{
rile
•- a r> . 6 e,� ! t � •..`+• b.s 4
e`dle,,.a, r el Sr , r>, r .. is r-f ....�' +es.`�' , _ ,tW It`• REVISION DATE:
.\ \ e.•
b. { ...r,
i/ 1r 4 ? ` �`6a`: SITE 8750 E1 Camino Real;. .,
Zone Change IP (Industrials"
,; SF-1'' " •6�a •�,., - ?, `' °' r"► s-, vi0.
~ 'j Park) to CS (Commercial
eC t - Service) ..
ape �� �, +ts,'2;�, [ •�' e• .r. J ,
i ye .re � °\.r•"'b'� e .+= w� 6 _. a-r•1 ,. , •.. `�,:
=t a '.� .�•� ti%•. •�;s, SF'�.. �� 7- ,, � .:• . . .�:
ai zee � 1 a t
,yt 'J' •q •p.a•• Sa4g.•s t v
17s' 1.
3e o t•tl ♦+ C fla v o ':r`,"S f,. K a 1 fir. ,t ,
..,i s "� •10•A R,� 14 f',re26 , to
)' y, sF 1� ze '1s s sS•�
3. .. — �G r$fib, rr .•.
-r : •'.. � POptO�� �.go:fir , e �.. 4,� ;�+'I+Z,•` �•---• rua %bi rr ri .. •.�
TZ
tyl� ; ••, y +Yt,�'arw� ^'j/. �+q.� n,s 30 ' r_;' S i
t 10ylif[ 31
RSFY . r •.,r
' to Cr > r, ' t'••.�?•• �
TT
4."'- w ...a
tits 1 • C wrr.a .50
7�SaoS '�-` • � •le � � Yr>, •1"'' ,>+It 6.1."r , � \ ^� -
t yJc' BOS*
of 1- � ,.. "`'F;i•.I 3 a V r ` � '_.. y
w ; ' .7 �,� .•�.A `sip: `'„ �' ; s ,", *,, ..<.RMF/ '
�' � '4a '�, as�S - t .r ...`,d•.>` ,` ,.r ..�.,^
yee s +•�Y ,`e�9
@ t - UI,•Q �_., .�. .•.,`r�. -. rya
.� \ • 10,11 _;S'• T I4\\ t,t's ahN .14Jj�'w \ 3
.. _ - ♦ cq >- le-A fib 3•1,04
�€la'1 • : •r. /' o •;g'' 4 \ . •
ire-,•1 x ,.:x
. r'S'ai• • roa °>/2 ns'' �+ •.•qty - T t
�
22
'. - .•)e_1 r...,.as ..__. ,•�+ s�a > � •a .i ..
..�' •., t 1 12 •' ,` rY, r, . •'• V gyp: ... •1'y�'
+}J R L:•t.•a> 3 ,\
• 23t� ..».0 ,ei3 ��'11-•yy;.a�}{i T• t•'M`i�
11
21 _ ,_ yµ.ntw.a>^.a 4rw NK.Lt.?.....«:•e,..•r
. RS - Y _'' . .ua an•+�W«Inn..r,.,t>.,..a.•r.•rc>u
M---.. ''r•� 20 '•,� i - a, <m er.inanuo':i_.w..l rr wvl.r.s
23• rrfw 1•�- • �` ': �� "'' ��! .. 71 u�,(�� J�T1 Ara, '•�.
• � • +,'! A�,►'• /:auaa iu,a> c>I il,...q R i r.nw
' a r- 1 = i`�'1 9\\ .'�Ky.-txl[I �. {: .'•.,sS4M..rr'''T�
CITY or ATASCA
`,
I� EXHIBIT A ORD. 161
Vr ..
ZONE CHANGE ZC•12-87
i_2-12
c
� ` 8750 El Camino•Real
IP to CS (Genzone)
� 13Y7
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Council October 13, 1987
VIA: Michael Shelton, City Manager
FROMp/,tHenry Engen, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Zone Change 9-87 and Tentative Parcel Map 10-87
LOCATION: 6875 Tecorida
APPLICANT: Woodglen Ltd.
REQUEST: To revise the existing RMF/16 (FH) zoning designation to
RMF/16 (FH) (PD-7) allowing for the creation of a Planned
Development Overlay providing for a small lot subdivision
of acres of vacant property into 9 lots varying in
siz from 3968 to 7074 square feet, and the establishment
of os Arboles as a private street name.
BACKGROUND:
The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing of this matter at
its September 15, 1987 meeting and recommended approval of Zone Change
9-87 and Tentative Parcel Map .10-87' in accordance with the findings
contained in the attached staff report and the revised conditions of
approval also attached.
There was some discussion and public testimony given as reflected in
the attached minutes excerpts.
RECOMMENDATION•
Approval of Tentative Parcel Map 10-87 subject to the revised condi-
tions of approval, and approval of Zone Change 9-87 by (1) reading by
title only Ordinance No. 160; and (2) approval of Ordinance No. 160
for first reading.
HE:ph
Enclosures: Staff Report - September 15 , 1987 -
Revised Conditions of Approval - September 15, 1987
Ordinance No. 160
Minutes Excerpt - September 15, 1987
• cc: Woodglen Ltd.
Cuesta Engineering
CITY OF ATASCADERO Item: B-3
STAFF REPORT
FOR: Planning Commission Meeting Date:Sept. 15, 1987
BY: Joel Moses , Associate Planner File No: . ZC: 9-87 &
TTM: 10-87
SUBJECT:
Zone Change 4-87 and Tentative Tract Map 10-87 initiated by
Woodglen Development Ltd. to rezone property at 6875 Tecorida
Ave from RMF/16 (FH) to RMF/16 (FH) (PD-7) to allow for the
development of the 1. 2 acre site into a small lot subdivision
containing 9 residential lots varying in size from 3968 square
feet to 7074 square feet.
BACKGROUND:
The site has been zoned RMF/16 (FH) (Residential Multiple Family
with a Flood Hazard Overlay) since the establishment of the •
current Zoning Ordinance in 1983. The site has been designated on
the current General Plan Land Use Map as High Density Multiple
Family since 1980. The property was in a moratorium area for
development for several years due to its location within the
Amapoa / Tecorida Flood Area . The moratorium on development was
only lifted with the establishment of standards for development
within a flood area. The area is not designated at this time
within a designated 100 year flood area, but is designated by
the City in response to studies under taken by the City on
flooding in the area.
The applicants initially submitted a request to rezone and
subdivide an additional parcel to the east of the site as a part
of the project. After review by the staff and a determination
that an Environmental Impact Report would be needed the applicant
scaled down the project and reduced the potential environmental
impacts.
A. SITUATION AND FACTS:
1. Applicant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..Woodglen;Development Ltd-:-
2. Representative. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Cuesta Engineering -
3. Project Address. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6875 Tecorida Ave
4. Legal Description. . . . . . . . . . . .Lots 30, 31 & 32 Block UA
•
Atasc.Col.
5. Site Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1. 2 acres
Zone Change 9-87 & TTM 10-87
Sept. 15, 1987
Page 2
6. Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .RMF/16 (FH) Residential
Multiple Family with a
Flood Hazard Overlay
7. General Plan Designation. . . . .High Density MultiFamily
8. Existing Use. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Vacant lot
9. Environmental Status. . . . . . . . .Negative Declaration posted
B. ANALYSIS:
The application proposes to rezone the property to allow the
re-subdivision of the land into a 9 unit small lot subdivision.
The rezoning of the property will be required due to the
property' s current zoning of RMF/16 (FH) requiring a minimum lot
size of 1/2 acre and the required front yard setbacks of 25'-0" .
As a part of that rezoning a specific plan for development and
coinciding tract map are being presented for approval ( Exhibits
B & C ) . The developer has also submitted a set of proposed
• development standards for the project (Exhibit D) .
The site is currently undeveloped along the south side of
Tecorida Road (undeveloped) east of San Andres Road. The site
contains a drainageway for the Amapoa/Tecorida area and a
portion of another drainageway coming from the south. The site
and adjoining road area also contain a number of trees. The
adjoining propertys are currently zoned RMF/16 (FH) to the south
and east . The property' s to the north across Tecorida Road are
zoned CR(FH) (PD-3) (Commercial Retail with Flood Hazard and
Planned Development overlays) . Across San Andres to the west the
zoning changes to LSF-Y(FH) (Limited Single Family Residential, 1
acre minimum lot size with sewer with a Flood Hazard Overlay)
In reviewing the project comments and information was acquired
from several outside agencies that add to the environmental
review of the project. The property is located close to a known
archaeological site and a site survey was required as a part of
the review. The survey noted no specific finds of archaeological
artifacts; if any are found during construction the find would be
reviewed at that time. Comments from Caltrans were also received
as to the potential impacts of development along Morro Road.
These impacts included delays and congestion at the Morro Road --
/Marchant Ave and the Morro Road/Atascadero Road intersections.
Concern was also expressed as to the need for construction of
additional drainage facilities. This is due to the design
capacities of the existing 36" culverts under Highway 101 that
were based on the undeveloped state of the drainage area
(Amapoa/Tecorida) when designed and installed. The comments were
Zone Change 9-87 & TTM 10-87
Sept. 15, 1987
Page 3
reviewed by the Public Works Director and a traffic and drainage
reports prepared for the project It was found that the current
development fees and proposed development improvements would
mitigate the potential impacts.
The site was also reviewed for potential problems with flora and
fauna removal. The plans were reviewed by the State Department of
Fish and Game. After the review a steam alteration permit was
issued under specified conditions listed in the permit.
Comments were received from the Building division about the
potential concerns as to the soils on the site. A soils report
was prepared by a Register Civil Engineer for the site. The
report was reviewed by the City' s Engineering division and found
adequate to allow for the development of the site.
The Fire Department' s review of the project showed no problems.
Access was good but standard fire hydrants shall be required.
Comments from utility companies requested standard easements and
advised that the site can be served from existing facilities. .
Under the current RMF/16 zoning of the property of the site
would fall under the hillside density standards. The application
was submitted initially before the standards went into effect but
will now have to comply with the new standards. At 16 units per
acre the site could have held 19 residential apartments. The
City' s current standards based on slope and the number of
bedrooms on the site could allow for a varying degree of
intensity of development. Densities could range from 16 units per
acre for 1 bedroom units to 6 units per acre for 4 bedroom units.
This could allow for the development of up to 19, 14, 10 or 7
residential units on the site. Under the developers proposal for
3 bedroom units on 0-10% slope a density of 8 units per acre
maybe allowed. This would allow a maximum of 10 units on the
site. The proposal is to provide 9 - 3 bedroom residential units
on the site and thus would be within the City' s density
standards. The proposed density would also be well below the
maximum of 19 units possible on the site.
The proposed site plan is also seeking to modify the street
frontage setbacks that are normally required for this type of
development. The normal 25 '-0" setback on the front of the
proposed lots is proposed to be reduced to 10' -0" on most of the
lots. The design still provides for a 20 ' -0" drive to a double
car garage for each of the units. The street side yards are
shown as being approximately 10'-0" which would be in conformance
with zoning ordinance standards (Sec 9-4. 107 (a) l) .
�� 1 •
Rel
Q �
►MI.
-„tom , ��Is
� �� � z �,�,I�I� � � ♦ � -
ANN
\����.�� per'-`':�► v tri►' _ ��v � ♦��* �, � � �1
♦• ♦ �� W ■
PIN
s� �`�-, t��. • ���� ��► � •: her tires'
NIP
•• . e .
�-
I/
Iva
��1►
III
IIIA
Aria
RM
:
RM
- . ��������.���hit!►;`:�.. � I � :,� ��I �
._ � .�►�. tom,• • ��►��j ��1 � her �ri-
• EXHIBIT C TRACT MAP
CITY OF A
TASCADERO 6875 Tecorida Road
'r.i,
-, Zone Change ZC: 9-87
�L`' � COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Tent.Tract Map TTM: JW7
DEPARTMENT woodglen Ltd/Cuesta
Aflu
jut o z Jnr
2 � �
4
♦ f
t
t�`,•y ,'�_.-_- _� ��\ ;`\'I,: ;\Tom__.--�-_=\�\\ __
�. �;
Lae
- :� ��,�� - � - '• 4c .�, Bili
fAN t ANOREI AVENUE
f
s �XHIBIT D Developers Sta.
6875 Tecorida Road
Zone Change ZC: 9-87
Tent Tract Map TTM:10-87
WOODGLEN PROPERTY Woodalen Ltd/Cuesta
Proposed Development Standards
a. ) Approval of a Site Utilization Plan (SUP) reflecting a Master
Plan of Development for a residential development and related uses
is required as part of the "PD" overlay zoning designation. The
SUP shall be incorporated in the "PD" development standards.
b. ) Any revisions or deviations from the approved SUP shall require
a Conditional Use Permit
c. ) The Level of Processing for individual building or grading
permits shall be a plot plan provided the proposal conforms to "PD"
development standards.
d. ) Building height shall be limited to thirty (30) feet, (not to
exceed two (2) stories) .
e. ) All street, sewer, water and underground utilities shall be
• provided by the developer prior to occupancy of any building.
f. ) Each lot in the development may be developed separately and
individually per the development standards.
g. ) The developer or applicant shall pay all applicable fees, such
as drainage fees, school fees, development fees, as required for a
single-family residence as each building permit is drawn or issued.
h. ) Development within the"PD" zone shall conform to the Flood
Hazard Overlay Standards for the project area.
i . ) No access shall be provided from San Andres Avenue. Access
from Tecorida Avenue shall be limited to two (2) private road
access encroachments per the SUP.
j . ) All project streets shall be private _easernent roads. The
Gross Area of each lot shall include a portion of the _
private easement road. A private Road Maintenance Agreement shall
be executed by all future property owners within the development.
! 0
k. ) The following minimum setbacks shall be provided as shown on
the SUP:
1 . ) Front setback shall be 10' to face of building except
that a minimum of 20' shall be provided from the edge of
the private road to the face of the garage door.
2. ) Rear yard setback shall be 15' except along Tecorida
Avenue where the rear yard setback shall be 12.5' .
3. ) Side yard setback shall be 10' for all corner lots on both
public and private streets.
Interior side yard setback shall be 51 .
l . ) Six (6) foot high solid fencing shall be provided along
property lines at San Andres and Tecorida Avenues with landscape
breaks for tree planting as shown on the SUP and landscape plans.
m. ) All utilities shall be provided underground.
n. ) All residences shall be constructed with a 2-car garage.
• Supplemental Statement
Woodglen Development
6875 Tecorida Avenue
The attached application is a request to establish a "PD" overlay
zone for 4 individual lots currently zoned RMF-16/FH.
The applicant proposes a single-family residential project rather
than multi-family apartment units permitted under the current
zoning. The project proposes 15 units (7 units per acre) rather
than 33 units (16 units per acre) allowed under current zoning.
Single-family detached units are in keeping with the mixed
residential uses in the neighborhood.
The "PD" overlay zone would allow creation of smaller lots so that
the project homes and lots can be individually and privately owned.
The "PD" Development Standards will ensure orderly development of
individual lots and maintenance of common easements and facilities.
The concurrent, planned development of the 4 separate lots will avoid
piecemeal work on the drainage areas. A master plan also improves
traffic circulation, reducing the number of access points to public
streets by providing one private street rather than four separate
driveways with parking lots.
"PD" modification of setbacks allows for better useable yards by
reducing front yards and increasing rear yards. "PD" control of
landscape design and maintenance ensures adequate screening and
shading of the project.
The attached development standards are proposed to supercede the
existing RMF zoning standards.
•
• i
EXHIBIT E - Findings for Approval
Tentative Tract Map 10-87
6875 Tecorida Road
Sept. 15, 1987
FINDINGS
1 . The creation of the proposed parcels conform to the Zoning
Ordinance and the General Plan land use designation , densities
and other policies.
2 . The creation of these parcels , in conformance with the
recommended Conditions of Approval, will not have a significant
adverse effect upon the environment. The Negative Declaration
.prepared for the project is adequate.
3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development
proposed.
4. The site is physically suitable for the density of the
development proposed.
5 . The design of the subdivision , and the proposed
improvements,will not cause substantial environmental damage or
substantially and avoidably injure fish and wildlife or their
habitat
6 . The design of the subdivision , and the type of the
improvements, will not conflict with easements acquired by the
public at large for access through or the use of property within
the proposed subdivision; or substantially equivalent alternate
easements are provided.
7. The proposed subdivision complies with Section 66474. 6 of the
State Subdivision Map Act as to the methods of handling and
discharge of waste.
8. The proposed subdivision will be in conformance with approved
Zone Change 9-87, RMF/16 (FH) (PD-7) and the existing development
standards for the City of Atascadero.
9. The proposed Zone Change and Tract Map are in compliance with
all pertinent city policy or criteria adopted by ordinance or
resolution of the City Council.
• EXHIBIT G - Conditions of Approval
Tentative Map 10-87
September 15, 1987
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1 . Water shall be obtained from the Atascadero Mutual Water
Company. Water lines shall be extended to the frontage of each
parcel or its public utilities easement prior to the recording of
the final map.
2. All existing and proposed utility, pipeline, open space, or
other easement are to be shown on the final map. If there are
building or other restrictions related to the easements, they
shall be noted on the final map.
3. Grading, and Drainage plans , prepared by a registered Civil
Engineer shall be submitted for review and approval by the
Community Development and Public Works Departments prior to the
issuance of any building permits or the recording of the final
map.
4. Obtain encroachment permit from the city of Atascadero Public
Works Department. Sign an Inspection Agreement and a curb Gutter
Agreement, guaranteeing that the work will be done and the
inspections paid for, prior to the issuance of a building permit
and construct improvements as directed by the encroachment by the
encroachment permit prior to the final building inspection or the
recording of the final map.
5 . A road maintenance agreement, in a form acceptable to the -
City Attorney, shall be recorded with the deed to each parcel at
the time it is first conveyed. A note to this effect shall appear
on the Final Map.
6 . Road improvement plans prepared by a Registered Civil
Engineer shall be submitted to the Community Development and
Public Works Departments for review and approval for the a
construction Tecorida Road, the subdivisions internal street (Los_.
Arboles) and the reconstruction of San Andres or recording of the
final map, or prior to the issuance of any building permit,
which ever comes first. Plans shall include, but not limited to :
a. Tecorida Road: Design shall conform to design of Tecorida
Road being prepared in connection with proposed
development at 6715 Morro Road per Precise Plan 03-87.
Plans shall include a minimum paved section -of 15 '-0'
plus City standard curb, gutter. and 5 '-0" sidewalk.
Design shall include measures to save and preserve trees_
within the right-of-way.
b. San Andres Road: Design shall include City standard curb,
gutter, 5 '-0" sidewalk and additional paveout, width to
be determined by the City Engineer not to exceed 15 '-0" .
Design shall include measures to protect and preserve
trees within the right-of-way.
c. Subdivision's internal street (Los Arboles) : Design shall
include measures to preserve and protect existing trees
on the site.
7 . Construction of the public road improvements shall be
completed (or bonded for) prior to the recording of the final
map.
8. All relocation and/or alteration of existing utilities shall
be responsibility of the developer at his sole expense.
9 . The newly created lots shall be connected to the Public
Sewer. All annexation permit fees shall be paid for the newly
created lot prior to the recording of the final map.
Sewer improvement plans shall be submitted for review and
approval by the Public Works Department prior to the recording of
the final map.
10. The applicant shall deposit with the Director of Public Works
a dollar amount determined by the Director of Public Work, which
shall be utilized for the future development of improvements for
the implementation of a Routes to School Plan for Santa Rosa
Elementary School.
11 . Public Improvement plans prepared for the site shall be
reviewed and approved by the Fire Department. The plans shall
include two standard fire hydrants. Design and location shall be
approved prior to the recording of the final map.
12. Parcels 6 & 7 shall have no direct access to San Andres Road
Parcels 1, 9, 8 & 7 shall have no direct access on to Tecorida
Road. Access shall be by way of the subdivisions internal street
(Los Arboles) . A note to that effect shall appear on the final
map.
13. An address identification signs shall be approved as a part
of the public improvement plans . the signs shall contain 4'
reflective address numbers for each residential unit served by a
driveway. The signs shall be located on the right hand side of.
the drive way and shall be so placed as not to effect the
visibility of the intersection.
14 . Prior to the approval of the improvement plans by the
Director of Public Works, either the Subdivider shall acquire
sufficient title or interest in the off-site land to allow the
improvements to be made as required by these conditions: or the
City Council , upon request by and at the expense of- the
subdivider, shall have made all appropriate findings and adopted
Resolution of Necessity as required by law so that tYje City may
exercise its power of Emminent Domain.
15 . Drainage Facilities shall be constructed to City of
Atascadero standards. All work shall be completed or bonded for
prior the final building inspection or the recording of the final
map.
i
16 . The Subdivider shall provide drainage easements and/or
drainage releases from the points of concentration of stormwater
leaving the project boundary through adjoining properties to the
nearest natural watercourses as approved by the Public Works
Department if applicable.
17 . All lot grading and drainage improvements shall require
write certification by a registered Civil Engineer that all work
has been completed and is in full compliance with the approved
plans.
18. All grading and erosion control measures shall be designed
by a registered Civil Engineer and constructed in accordance with
the City of Atascadero grading codes and standards. Prior to the
final building inspection, said engineer shall submit to the City
written certification that grading is in conformance with said
codes and standards , including all Flood Hazard Overlay Zone
requirements.
19 . The subdivider shall install all street signs , traffic
delineation devices, warning and regulatory signs, guardrails,
barricades , and other similar devices were required by the
Director of Public Works. Signs shall be in conformance with the
Department of Public works standards and the current State of
• California uniform sign chart. Installation of traffic devices
shall be subject to review and modifications after construction.
20. Offer of dedication to the City of Atascadero the following
rights-of-Way and or easements:
Street Name: Tecorida Road
Limits: 20 '-0" along westerly edge of property frontage
adjacent to Tecorida Road.
Minimum Width: 40 '-0" Right-of-Way
21 . Offer for dedication to the Public the Public Utility
Easements.
22. Offers of dedication shall be completed and recorded prior to
or simultaneous to the recordation of the final map.
23. A Drainage Maintenance Agreement, in a form acceptable to the
City Attorney, shall be recorded with the deed to each parcel at
the time it is first conveyed and a note to this effect shall be
placed on the final map.
24 . Prior to the recording of the final map , a soils
investigation ( as required by the Subdivision Map Act) shall be
submitted, recommending corrective actions which will prevent
structural damage to each structure proposed to be constructed in
the area where soil problems exist , as indicated in the
Preliminary Soils Report. The date of such reports, The name of
the Engineer making the report, and the location where the
reports are on file shall be noted on the final map.
25. All lots shall be individually connected to the public sewer
system.Sewer laterals shall be extended to the frontage of each
lot prior to the recording the final map. Permits for the
connection to the sewer shall be obtained from the Public Works
Department prior to the work being done.
26 . The applicant shall establish Covenants , Conditions and
Restrictions (CC&Rs) for the regulation of land use,control of
nuisances, architectural control of all buildings, driveway and
landscape maintenance. These CC&Rs shall be submitted for review
and approval by the City Attorney and the Community Development
Department prior to the recording of the final map. .
27. Zone Change ZC: 9-87 shall be approved and in effect prior to
the recording of the final map.
28 . A final map in substantial conformance with the approved
tentative map and in compliance with all conditions set forth
herein shall be submitted for review and approval in accordance
with the Subdivision Map Act and the City' s Subdivision Ordinance
prior to the recording of the final map.
a. Monuments shall be set at all new property corners created and
a Registered Civil. Engineer or Licensed Land Surveyor shall
indicate, by certificate on the final map, that the corners have
been set by the date specific and that they will be sufficient to
enable the survey to be retraced.
b. A recently updated preliminary title report shall be submitted
for review in conjunction with the processing of the final map.
c. A preliminary subdivision guarantee shall be submitted for
review in conjunction with the processing of the final map.
29. Approval of this tentative map shall expire two years from
the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted
pursuant to a written request prior to the expiration date.
30. Applicant shall pay all applicable development fees in effect
at the time of issuance of building permits. The Amapoa/Tecorida
Drainage development fees shall be based on Multiple Family use
of the site.
•
10/10OUNCIL AGENDA
ITEM: B-4
APPROVALSHAVE B�ENIRE-COPIEDO
. EXHIBIT G - Conditions of Approval
Tentative Map 10-87 AS NOT ALL CONDITIONS WERE PRINTED.
September 15, 1987 (REVISED)
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1 . Water shall be obtained from the Atascadero Mutual Water
Company. Water lines shall be extended to the frontage of each
parcel or its public utilities easement prior to the recording of
the final map.
2. All existing and proposed utility, pipeline, open space, or
other easement are to be shown on the final map. If there are
building or other restrictions related to the easements, they
shall be noted on the final map.
3. Grading, and Drainage plans , prepared by a registered Civil
Engineer shall be submitted for review and approval by the
Community Development and Public Works Departments prior to the
issuance of any building permits or the recording of the final
map.
4. Obtain encroachment permit from the city of Atascadero Public
Works Department . Sign an Inspection Agreement and a curb Gutter
Agreement , guaranteeing that the work will be done and the
inspections paid for, prior to the issuance of a building permit
and construct improvements as directed by the encroachment by the
encroachment permit prior to the final building inspection or the
recording of the final map.
S . A road maintenance agreement, in a form acceptable to the
City Attorney, shall be recorded with the deed to each parcel at
the time it is first conveyed. A note to this effect shall appear
on the Final Map.
6 . Road improvement plans prepared by a Registered Civil
Engineer shall be submitted to the Community Development and
Public Works Departments for review and approval for the
construction Tecorida Road, the subdivisions internal street (Los
Arboles) and the CONSTRUCTION of IMPROVEMENTS ON San Andres or
recording of the final map, or prior to the issuance of any
building permit, which ever comes first . Plans shall include, but
not limited to :
a. Tecorida Road: Design shall conform to design of Tecorida
Road being prepared in connection with proposed
development at 6715 Morro Road per Precise Plan 03-87 .
Plans shall include a minimum paved section of 15 ' -0"
Plus City standard curb, gutter and 5 ' -0" sidewalk.
Design shall include measures to save and preserve trees
within the right-of-way. (SEE # 10)
b. San Andres Road: Design shall include City standard curb,
gutter, 5 ' -0" sidewalk and additional paveout , width to
VARY FROM 20' FEET TO 10' FEET FROM THE CENTER LINE TO
THE FACE OF CURB, DESIGN TO be determined by the City
b
Engineer. Design shall include measure,.& tiro prwtiect and
preserve trees within the right-of-way.
c. Subdivision' s internal street (Los Arbolkis)):A i;ishall
include measures to preserve and protect iis :iira trees
on the site.
7 . Construct ion of the publ is road improren is sfthaalik be
completed (or bonded for) prior to the recortliing wff t�:` ifinal
map.
8. All relocation and/or alteration of existirgj u4i®1d1ties satall
be responsibility of the developer at his sole ar _
9 . The newly created lots shat I be connecte-& taD t4i* l?'obllc
Sewer . All annexation permit fees sha1I be pwii all f ly
created lotS prior to the recording of the final! ma -
Sewe r improvement plans sha I I be submi t telt Fair mewiiam and
approval by the Public Works Department prior to) t4vm mwev, 4rdims of
the final map.
10. The applicant shall deposit with the Direct )?r; wfF ftiMiMix: Nmrks
a dollar amount determined by the Director of likc Vftwllk. ircb
shall be utilized for the future development of iimpramanTwmts for
the implementation of a Routes to School Plain fmtr Samia Rosa
Elementary School (SEE # 6A) . FEES SHALL BE DEFGSFIM WMIN TjHE
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FOR THE LINEAR FEET
SIDEWALK 1S NOT CONSTRUCTED, AT A UNIT PRICE OF, $I-SM PER SQtMRE
FOOT.
11 . Publ is Improvement plans prepared for Vlkw, silt_ silo be
reviewed and approved by the Fire Department., ll&ms shall l
include two standard fire hydrants . Design and I iishall be
approved prior to the recording of the final map-
12 .
ap-12 . Parcels 6 & 7 shall have no direct access b;ca Sri Andres Road
Parcels 1 , 9,- 8 & 7 sha I I have no direct access i - o, Vecorida
Road. Access shall be by way of the subdivision-.s �rli secret
( Los Arboles ) . RELINQUISHMENT OF ACCESS 80BE
DELINEATED ON THE FINAL MAP.
13. Address identification signs sha I I be approv;t as as part of
the publ is improvement plans . the signs silo,&i it ce)mttzln 4a
reflective address numbers for each res i dent i all was ltt �r-w;e;,d by a
driveway. The signs shall be located on the rii4htt I#t n-d side of
the drive way and sha I I be so placed as ne-A #baa e,,ffec t the
visibility of the intersection.
14 . Prior to the approval of the improvermrod, pliams lby the
Director of Public Works, either the Subdivii rr •llll acquire
sufficient title or interest in the off-site Jilainxe ttm ailftm ithe
improvements to be made as required by these tii#tii :: or itle
City Counc i 1 , upon request by and at thin e3qpemse ,oif Ithe
subdivider, sha 11 have made a I I appropriate f imt ii aar WIted
Resolution of Necessity as required by law so tzt WjvE (Cutty zoy
. exercise its power of Imminent Domain.
15 . Drainage Facilities shall be constructed to City of
Atascadero standards. All work shall be completed or bonded for
prior the final building inspection or the recording of the final
map.
16 . The Subdivider shall provide drainage easements and/or
drainage releases from the points of concentration of stormwater
leaving the project boundary through adjoining properties to the
nearest natural watercourses as approved by the Public Works
Department if applicable.
17 . All lot grading and drainage improvements shall require
write certification by a registered Civil Engineer that all work
has been completed and is in full compliance with the approved
plans.
18. All grading and erosion control measures shall be designed
by a registered Civil Engineer and constructed in accordance with
the City of Atascadero grading codes and standards. Prior to the
final building inspection, said engineer shall submit to the City
written certification that grading is in conformance with said
codes and standards , including all Flood Hazard Overlay Zone
requirements.
19 . The subdivider shall install all street signs , traffic
delineation devices, warning and regulatory signs, guardrails,
barricades , and other similar devices were required by the
Director of Public Works. Signs shall be in conformance with the
Department of Public works standards and the current State of
California uniform sign chart . Installation of traffic devices
shall be subject to review and modifications after construction.
20. Offer of dedication to the City of Atascadero the following
rights-of-Way -and or easements :
Street Name : Tecorida Road
Limits : 20 ' -0" along westerly edge of property frontage
adjacent to Tecorida Road.
Minimum Width: 40 ' -0" Right-of-Way
21 . Offer for dedication to the Public the Public Utility
Easements.
22 . Offers of dedication shall be completed and recorded prior to
or simultaneous to the recordation of the final map.
23. A Drainage Maintenance Agreement , in a form acceptable to the
City Attorney, shall be recorded with the deed to each parcel at
the time it is first conveyed and a note to this effect shall be
placed on the final map, OR BUILD THE STORM SYSTEM TO CITY
STANDARDS TO BE ACCEPTED INTO THE MAINTAINED CITY DRAINAGE
SYSTEM.
f�1
t.
2 . Prior to the recording of the final map, a soils
investigation ( as required by the Subdivision Map Act) shall be
submitted, recommending corrective actions which will prevent
structural damage to each structure proposed to be constructed in
the area where soil problems exist , as indicated in the
Preliminary Soils Report . The date of such reports, The name of
the Engineer making the report , and the location where the
reports are on file shall be noted on the final map.
25. All lots shall be individually connected to the public sewer
system.Sewer laterals shall be extended to the frontage of each
lot prior to the recording the final map. Permits for the
connection to the sewer shall be obtained from the Public Works
Department prior to the work being done.
26 . The applicant shall establish Covenants , Conditions and
Restrictions (CCERs) for the regulation of land use, control of
nuisances, architectural control of all buildings, driveway and
landscape maintenance. These CCBRs shall be submitted for review
and approval by the City Attorney and the Community Development
Department prior to the recording of the final map.
27 . Zone Change ZC: 9-87 shall be approved and in effect prior to
the recording of the final map.
28 . A final map in substantial conformance with the approved
tentative map and in compliance with all conditions set forth
herein shall be submitted for review and approval in accordance
with the Subdivision Map Act and the City' s Subdivision Ordinance
prior to the recording of the final map.
a . Monuments shall be set at all new property corners created and
a Registered Civil Engineer or Licensed Land Surveyor shall
indicate, by certificate on the final map, that the corners have
been set by the date specific and that they will be sufficient to
enable the survey to be retraced.
b. A recently updated preliminary title report shall be submitted
for review in conjunction with the processing of the final map.
c . A preliminary subdivision guarantee shall be submitted for
review in conjunction with the processing of the final map.
29 . Approval of this tentative map shall expire two years from
the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted
pursuant to a written request prior to the expiration date.
30 . Applicant shall pay all applicable development fees in effect
at the time of issuance of building permits. The Amapoa /Tecorida
Drainage development fees shall be based on Multiple Family use
of the site.
ORDINANCE NO. 160
AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ATASCADERO AMENDING SECTION MAP NUMBER 17 OF
OFFICIAL ZONING MAPS OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO
BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY AT 6875 TECORIDA ROAD FROM
RMF/16 (FH) (RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY, 16 UNITS PER ACRE
WITH A FLOOD HAZARD OVERLAY) TO RMF/16 (FH) (PD-7)
(RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY, 16 UNITS PER ACRE WITH A FLOOD
HAZARD AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAYS)
(ZC 9-87 : WOODGLEN)
WHEREAS, the proposed zoning map amendment is consistent with the
General Plan as required by Section 65860 of the California Government
Code; and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendment is in conformance with Section
65800 et seq. of the California Government Code concerning zoning reg-
ulations; and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendment will not have a significant ad-
verse impact upon the environment. The Negative Declaration prepared
for the project is adequate; and
WHEREAS, the Atascadero Planning Commission held a public hearing
on September 15, 1987 and has recommended approval of Zone Change
9-87.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Atascadero does ordain
as follows:
Section 1. Council Findings.
1. The proposal is compatible with the surrounding land use and
zoning.
2. The proposal is consistent with the General Plan land use
element and other elements contained in the General Plan.
3. The proposal will not result in any significant adverse envi-
ronmental impacts, and preparation of an Environmental Impact
Report is not necessary.
4. The appearance of the project is in compliance with the
City' s Appearance Review Manual guidelines.
Section 2. Zoning Map.
Map Number 17 of the Official Zoning Maps of the City of Atasca-
dero on file in the City Community Development Department is hereby
amended to reclassify Lots 30, 31 and 32 of Block UA of the Atascadero
Colony as shown on attached Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B" which are made
a part of this ordinance by reference.
J
Ordinance No. 160 .
Section 3. Publication.
The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published once
within fifteen (15) days after its passage in the Atascadero News, a
newspaper of general circulation, printed, published and circulated in
this City in accordance with Government Code Section 36933 ; shall cer-
tify the adoption of this ordinance; and shall cause this ordinance
and certification to be entered in the Book of Ordinances of this
City.
Section 4. Effective Date.
This ordinance shall go into effect and be in full force and ef-
fect at 12:01 a.m. on the thirty-first (31st) day after its passage.
On motion by and seconded by
the foregoing ordinance is hereby adopted in its en-
tirety by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
DATE ADOPTED:
CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA
BARBARA NORRIS, Mayor
ATTEST:
BOYD C. SHARITZ, City Clerk
• Ordinance No. 160
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
MICHAEL SHELTON, City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
JEFFREY G. JORGENSEN, City Attorney
PREPARED BY:
HENRY ENGEN,
Community Development Director
i
t=g � ;� �� ,.�[ •
Au
+ST,`�,G y, sa _, l�/'T ``° ' 0.0 h�.,,� ,.• F,y�,
RMF/16
i ,���� Y�1 :mac ; ,��"f�-`U `• „r� ,4; a. f�'�. -,+ 6 t'.�►-ila�N-t ..
�, ♦ e• i f r;'�Y• 0° Y "� 4ba [!„k ��”„ ;� ,�.S�t,,. SITE 6875 T ecorida Road
ZC: 9-87 RMF/16 (FH) to
RMF 16 FH PD-7
�` ti,::. A Baer.„• :�v, ,
.-i-7RMF/16
r , ' •'osr _ as �`'� '� O "t\bier��+.. 1�--. 3 �+SL d t- \e +� +e M/� eNs
_ .. rroJar,w ua r• `6 .a LL +' Y- ^l a a..a \°+h>,a. . ,,t�� o,'
•h�,.ya ' ■6 'St ° hfi�.l° ' '�, ,Its t +•, ,�\TS'• I I 'f - 1,4 'a t S\L0. Yl {{ ,. +p'�S
.. 4I)fia ..M,3 ,�t( ;,,,f.• L \ ' r H
'.t. .yI"e 'k, ix �,� i 'e to •..r ,tm Io •' `► , �n 'a. tb�. �' •,+ '`'`
� I�Mb �rrS F b t• o r �fr� � 2 S+ a `' l] 18
'�?�•d Fa , ,'lae , r! It •It r%'� 1 11 S +• ,O,le H -' a
r� ,tz a it,+ �[ "o° saT• .so i t - , ,moi •••; >t i
�� �`t' .:�„�-D�3 ra,2oP-J 'zo �; Lr>_ nit[ ',� ,ss�s° reoo ,?e� f \.x a �¢. � ..�t Se '' •ate
t.
'�' r >rY ,+e l °.\ iM •QG rbSy 1.4J 'Jo ''�+� . \t'•. ,w `,,
LSF-Y
.,. a ,+z � r' •°sO [ rsoo n._ 1 'e 600 ...fi ! ''-•� y\
�b $ •1Q • ° ,..er .'�. �ll,� S' a ,. p \+''
ns ca,:/r:° .as• s:o 'xs .,; ,r-2z �i [o • 6 AT-60-C41
ri' .. :1'`- y rb, •sus f�`T±_� ,., .rte. ! a ,i.6
'z' r� 't>is 's•o s• t,e ¢i.. ;� • AT-7e-LOS 14 9I _
.r �;..�
LSF-Y(FH) ar 7e 45
e ,Ian
AT
(�
�\ U� ,z7 1. b a•>e'1 _ o 3 , � sten., �
LSF—Y(FH)
• �'f� ,,tp t„ . 3 ! rr .•- �Im >,. `off VI1 14A e� _
.'
19
LSF-i '
�� rt �,,[ > _ ""„ g I,.s a ro•\
a>' 'S,Y3• rs ,!• a mr+la bl--• Y'e�+°� - - _
i�. • tet• '[ •0 e`"� � e it �M wai 1S• - -
rr w
20 ;. ':.C.. .rJ,• r> •i •r\ 'Ir :,�R• a Yoh^0'y`� e.tr t�� ,,� ♦�� O .'
o 'r,. t \, r>!'i{.\t,. 23
OA
'ritSF—Y(FH) ..IL , ' °:' • ,4 dla� �p5 ,,
ia: ' sr rb a 'tas„ iv i p,;.26-A 7
5,r c G rr `. � .y y?
'-`.y;.�� - � r r f r� ,O [r, °, •� . r,S 5 rte+ —Y 27 b O•ji •'
'� •rs rf � fin, ys�."� `�`\ s.', •v. t''w >>,f 0`�
'y I� Thr• �S' �/ �[A� a''I' ., +.+'.l '.,, tom.
o/�� �-a i�°a e•s �.� r " e,�j9,"�. 4�jDS t%�9 ego ��.f`,o•P�
' o \ :i� ,y Y�r' eys, rH �6 V''n3'• ga°9i'� '.+p'n a,,+>>../20
•
RM 16(FH) 3 z� so
'n� lo�a .,y Le"
s.. o.11- • i .F y> 1•' �. i c��✓•,�-
3I qI i�'•h y/'=��s. -
�22 G,
f INS
i CITY
. OF ATASCADE -
s
�I Planning Apartment
I !' r
r
1 ._ - ( ,`,. D lr r y) >�s is r �"}. '►
�1( G Y 1 r e..Ir..I.�r2 s-e I— \I/I/ •�t'..tl`le.e,^ I�II+a J,+a N..wtOM.elrr wrlw.
W�...al ,M. rim I. �� � • I ♦r.�rl.�1.Wrl�•[r•..,t-.Sw
�r 4 `11j�,ir1�I I 1 1 , )!( y • �r*.ue•N ar ar rt u.�r eo•LLa g11etK earlro n,r
., ( i4)%►i EXHIBIT A ORD. 160
Zone Change ZC:9-87
Map No. .17 6875 Tecorida Road
Tent.Tract Map TTM:10-87
Woodglen Ltd/Cuesta
CITY OF ATASCADERO EXHIBIT B ORD. 160
Zone Change ZC• 9-87
� -
�feu'�n f 1978-7
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 6875 Tecorida Road
DEPARTMENT Woodglen Ltd/Cuesta
tit
I ,
i � ,��.,'• rn il, .a
I " ISI'• I'Y,ti Aft
O i I� 1 IT
It
rl
R Ji
I
I
o Z ° � i 1. 4 1 H7
c _
1 J
m
Tco
_ r
f
Minutes - Planning Commission - September 15, 1987
2. Zone Change 12-87:
R uest initiated by Sandra L. Genzone t revise the existing
IP dustrial Park) zoning designat' to CS (Commercial
Service on approximately 0.75 are of vacant land. Subject
site is 1 ated at 8750 E1 Cam' o Real; legal description
being Lot 3 Block 7, Atas ero Colony.
Mr. Moses presented th sta report on this matter recommending
approval of the zone cha request noting that this property cur-
rently has a split zo ' g o ndustrial Park and Commercial Ser-
vice zoning which place in 983 and that the zoning was being
sought to enable edevelopment as motel..
Sandra Gen ne, applicant, appeared an tated she was happy with
staff' s ecommendation.
M ON: Made by Commissioner Kidwell, seconde y Commissioner
Copelan and carried 6 :0 with a roll ca vote to recom-
mend approval of Zone Change 12-87.
3. Zone Change 9-87 and Tentative Parcel Map 10-87 :
Request initiated by Woodglen Ltd. (Cuesta Engineering) to
revise the existing RMF/16 (FH) zoning designation to RMF/16
(FH) (PD7) allowing for the creation of a Planned Development
Overlay providing for a small lot subdivision consisting of
the subdivision of 2.1 acres of vacant property into 9 lots •
varying in size from 3968 to 7074 square feet and the estab-
lishment of Los Arboles as a private street name. Subject
site is located at 6875 Tecorida in the City of Atascadero;
legal description being Lots 30 , 31 and 32 of Block UA in
Atascadero Colony.
Commissioner Michielssen stepped down from the Commission due to a
possible conflict of interest.
Mr. Moses apologized for the lateness in the distribution of the
staff report and proceeded to present the report recommending con-
ditional approval of the requests. He pointed out_ a set of re-
vised conditions of approval for the tentative map, which the Com-
mission took a few minutes to review.
Paul Sensibaugh, Public Works Director , responded to various ques-
tions from the Commission pertaining to drainage requirements,
circulation patterns in the area, CalTrans' priority in signaliza-
tion for the Morro Road-San Andres intersection.
Mike Bewsey, agent for the applicant, stated he had reviewed the -"
revised questions and had no problems with them. He then answered
questions from the Commission.
3
Minutes - Planning Commission - September 15, 1987
. Commissioner Bond stated he liked the design and plan of the
project.
MOTION: Made by Commissioner Bond, seconded by Commissioner
Copelan and carried 5 :0 on a roll call vote to recommend
approval of Zone Change 9-87 as reflected in the draft
resolution and Tentative Tract Map 10-87 subject to the
revised conditions of approval.
Commissioner Michielssen took his place back on the Commission.
4 Tentative Parcel Ma 21-87:
Request initiated by Tom Gouff (Dan Stewart) to r subdivide
two existing developed residential lots totalin 2.03 acres
to four lots varying in size from 22,990 squ re feet to ,
20 225 square feet. Subject site is located 8865 Portola
Roa • legal description being a portion of Lo 32, Block 7,
Atasc dero Colony.
Mr. Moses pre ented the staff report recommending approval of the
the application He pointed out a revised s of conditions which
superceded the c dition contained in the a enda packet.
Mr. Moses and Mr. S sibaugh then respon ed to various questions
from the Commission.
Tom Gouff, applicant, to ked about t e background involved in ini-
tially trying to obtain a of spl ' back in 1978 through the
County. He expressed c ncern with Conditions #4 (improvement
plans for private access dri w ) ; #14 (fire hydrant) ; #6 and . #8
(road improvements) ; #12 (an xation fees) . Discussion followed
with clarifications and reaso i s on the conditions offered by
Mr. Moses and Mr. Sensibaug .
There was discussion amo the Commi sion concerning the flag lot
figuration;. the possibl reduction in ots from four lots to three
lots; and concerns wit the road easeme t to Parcel 3; and the
possibility of a re sign of the site p n. Discussion also cen-
tered on clarification and possible modifi ations to the condi-
tions which were concern to the applicant
MOTION: Made b Commissioner Bond and seconde by Commissioner
Kidw 1 to deny Tentative Parcel Map 21 7.
Discussion ontinued among the Commission.
The -motion was defeated 4 :2 with' a roll call te:
AYES: Commissioners Bond and Kidwell
NOES : Commissioners Michielssen, Lopez-Balbontin, ope-
lan, and Chairman Nolan
4
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: City Council
THROUGH: Michael Shelton, City Manager .
FROM: Jette Christiansson, Accounting Supervisor
DATE: October 6 , 1987
SUBJECT: Three-Month Budget Report
BUDGET OVERVIEW
GENERAL FUND
Overview
The General Fund shows a deficit in the amount of $473,205
through the first three months of FY87-88. This is due primarily
to high front-end costs (liability insurance, overtime for the
recent fire) . Also, the majority of our revenues are received
later during the year (in December and April) .
Revenue
Actual operating revenue is running slightly above 19.1
percent after three months of the budget year. Again, this is
due to the fact that Property Tax revenues will be received later
in the year . Sales Tax revenues are running above expectations.
• Part of this is due to a change in the State Board of Equalization
procedure. We will be receiving part of our allocation 90 days
early. Most other revenues are coming in above expectations.
Expenditures
Year-to-date expenditures, on the whole, are below appro-
priations. A few departments are exceeding the budget appropria-
tion for this time of year.
Basically, the expenditures in all departments are in good
shape. Some departments had some high costs early in the year
(liability insurance, fire) that were a one-time only expense.
Unless something unforeseen happens during the next nine months,
all departments should end the year within their budget appro-
priation.
Capital Improvement Projects
The three-month actual shows very little expenditures to date
in the area of capital improvements. If you are interested-- -in the
status of a par-ticular project, please contact Dave Jorgensen.
Enterprise Funds
• Revenues for the Enterprise Funds are running below appro-
priations. I don' t see any problems with these funds since the
majority of our revenues are received later in the year. Continued
monitoring will take place for the balance of the fiscal year.
Summary
We will continue .to monitor to determine how the current
budgets compare with historical trends. The City's investments
are being maintained at the highest level possible and some
revenues are coming in above expectations. The City currently
has $2,040 ,000 invested in the Local Agency Investment Fund. The
City also has $788,203 invested in Certificates of Deposit and
a Bankers Acceptance. The Sanitation District currently has
$2,340,000 invested in the Local Agency Investment Fund.
If there are any questions or concerns as you review the
attached data, please let me know.
file: bg3month
•
CITY OF ATASCADERO
GENERAL FUND
Three Months to 09-30-87
Summary
1987-1988 3 MONTH
APPROPRIATIONS ACTUAL PERCENT
REVENUE $5, 040, 058 $ 963,170 19 .1
EXPENDITURES 5,040 ,058 (1, 436,375) 28.5
DEFICIT $ (473,205)
File: genfndsm
•
i
CITY OF ATASCADERO
GENERAL FUND
REVENUE
Three Months to 09-30-87
1987-1988 3 MONTH
SOURCE APPROPRIATIONS ACTUAL PERCENT
Property Tax $1,323,000 $ 38 ,141 2.9
Sales Tax 1,250 ,000 410,410 32.8
Occupancy Tax 90,000 30,515 33.9
Franchise Tax 210 ,000 8,689 4.1
Other Taxes 71, 800 26,924 37. 5
Business Licenses 82,000 21,748 26.5
Permits
312, 550 42,160 13. 5
Fines 108,300 25,727* 23. 8
Invest. Earnings 60, 000 -0- -0-
Rents/Concessions 13,000 1,114 8.6
Motor Vehicle 665, 025 182,328 27 .4
Cigarette Tax 50 ,000 12, 450 24.9
Police Reimbursements 82, 429 23, 064 28.0
Planning Fees 162,125 26,525 16.4
Admin. Chg. Sanit. 66,988 16,747 25.0
Admin. Chg.-Zoo 6,000 1, 500 25.0
Recreation Fees 163 , 000 56, 466 34. 6
Other Revenue 34 ,191 10 ,143 29. 7
Sub-Total $4 ,750 ,408 $ 934 ,651 19.7
Dev. Mit. Tax 249 , 000 28, 519** 11. 5
Fund Balance 40 ,650 -0- -0-
Total $5,040,058 $ 963 ,170 19. 1
* Includes a transfer from the Traffic Safety Fund.
** Transferred to Capital Projects Fund.
file: gnfndrev
i
. CITY OF ATASCADERO
GENERAL FUND
EXPENDITURES
Three Months to 09-30-87
1987-1988 3 MONTH
DEPARTMENT APPROPRIATIONS ACTUAL PERCENT
City Council $ 33, 434 $ 7 , 721 23.1
City Clerk 47,224 5,132 10.9
City Treasurer 2,403 92 3. 8
City Manager 108,901 26,833 24. 6
Personnel 57, 214 11, 550 20.2
D.P./Comm. 86 ,901 13 ,416 15.4
City Attorney 45, 091 14, 234 31.6
Finance 151, 865 36,130 23.8
Comm. Devel. 533,142 131,515 24.7
Police 1,340,709 356,236 26.6
Fire 728,309 202,993 27. 9
Recreation 253,969 74 ,035 29. 2
Parks 212,827 63,711 29.9
Engineering 122,814 31,710 25.8
Streets 366, 413 84 ,833 23.2
Bldg. Maint. 156 ,704 29,659 18.9
Risk Mgmt. 313, 099 252,791 80.7
Non-Dept. 112, 265 35,821 31. 9
Sub-Total $4,673,284 $1, 378,412 29. 5
Contr . to Zoo Ent. 117 ,774 29, 444 25. 0
Contr. to CIP 249 ,000 28, 519 11. 5
Total $5,040 ,058 $1,436,375 28 .5
File: gnfndexp
•
CITY OF ATASCADERO
GAS TAX
Three Months to 09-30-87
Summary
1987-1988 3 MONTH
APPROPRIATIONS ACTUAL PERCENT
REVENUE $ 255,897 $ 47, 842 18.7
EXPENDITURES 255,897 ( 11,858) * 4.6
EXCESS $ 35,984
*Includes SB-300 street overlay expenditures.
file: gstxmoac
CITY OF ATASCADERO
GENERAL FUND
EXPENDITURES
Three Months to 09-30-87
1987-1988 3 MONTH
DEPARTMENT APPROPRIATIONS ACTUAL PERCENT
City Council $ 33, 434 $ 7, 721 23.1
City Clerk 47,224 5,132 10.9
City Treasurer 2,403 92 3.8
City Manager 108,901 26 ,833 24. 6
Personnel 57, 214 11, 550 20.2
D.P./Comm. 86 ,901 13 ,416 15.4
City Attorney 45, 091 14, 234 31.6
Finance 151, 865 36,130 23. 8
Comm. Devel. 533,142 131, 515 24.7
Police 1,340 ,709 356,236 26.6
Fire 728,309 202,993 27.9
Recreation 253,969 74,035 29.2
Parks 212,827 63 ,711 29.9
Engineering 122,814 31,710 25.8
Streets 366, 413 84 , 833 23.2
Bldg. Maint. 156 ,704 29,659 18.9
Risk Mgmt. 313, 099 252, 791 80.7
Non-Dept. 112, 265 35 ,821 31. 9
Sub-Total $4,673 ,284 $1,378 ,412 29. 5
Contr . to Zoo Ent. 117 ,774 29, 444 25. 0
Contr. to CIP 249 ,000 28 , 519 11. 5
Total $5,040 ,058 $1, 436,375 28. 5
File: gnfndexp
CITY OF ATASCADERO
GAS TAX
Three Months to 09-30-87
Summary
1987-1988 3 MONTH
APPROPRIATIONS ACTUAL PERCENT
REVENUE $ 255,897 $ 47, 842 18.7
EXPENDITURES 255,897 ( 11,858) * 4.6
EXCESS $ 35,984
*Includes SB-300 street overlay expenditures.
file: gstxmoac
0
CITY OF ATASCADERO
GENERAL FUND
EXPENDITURES
Three Months to 09-30-87
1987-1988 3 MONTH
DEPARTMENT APPROPRIATIONS ACTUAL PERCENT
City Council $ 33, 434 $ 7,721 23.1
City Clerk 47,224 5,132 10.9
City Treasurer 2, 403 92 3. 8
City Manager 108,901 26 ,833 24. 6
Personnel 57, 214 11,550 20 .2
D.P./Comm. 86 ,901 13,416 15.4
City Attorney 45, 091 14, 234 31. 6
Finance 151, 865 36,130 23.8
Comm. Devel. 533 ,142 131, 515 24.7
Police 1,340 ,709 356,236 26.6
Fire 728, 309 202,993 27.9
Recreation 253,969 74 ,035 29.2
Parks 212,827 63,711 29.9
Engineering 122,814 31,710 25.8
Streets 366, 413 84,833 23.2
Bldg. Maint. 156,704 29,659 18.9
Risk Mgmt. 313, 099 252,791 80.7
Non-Dept. 112 ,265 35,821 31. 9
Sub-Total $4 ,673 ,284 $1,378, 412 29. 5
Contr . to Zoo Ent. 117, 774 29, 444 25. 0
Contr. to CIP 249 , 000 28, 519 11. 5
Total $5,040 ,058 $1, 436,375 28.5
File: gnfndexp
CITY OF ATASCADERO
GAS TAX
Three Months to 09-30-87
Summary
1987-1988 3 MONTH
APPROPRIATIONS ACTUAL PERCENT
REVENUE $ 255,897 $ 47, 842 18.7
EXPENDITURES 255,897 ( 11,858) * 4.6
EXCESS $ 35,984
*Includes SB-300 street overlay expenditures.
file: gstxmoac
0
CITY OF ATASCADERO
GENERAL FUND
EXPENDITURES
Three Months to 09-30-87
1987-1988 3 MONTH
DEPARTMENT APPROPRIATIONS ACTUAL PERCENT
City Council $ 33, 434 $ 7, 721 23.1
City Clerk 47,224 5,132 10.9
City Treasurer 2,403 92 3.8
City Manager 108,901 26,833 24.6
Personnel 57,214 11, 550 20 . 2
D.P./Comm. 86 ,901 13,416 15.4
City Attorney 45, 091 14, 234 31.6
Finance 151,865 36,130 23. 8
Comm. Devel. 533,142 131,515 24. 7
Police 1, 340 ,709 356,236 26.6
Fire 728,309 202,993 27.9
Recreation 253,969 74 ,035 29.2
Parks 212,827 63,711 29.9
Engineering 122,814 31,710 25.8
Streets 366, 413 84 , 833 23.2
Bldg. Maint. 156,704 29,659 18.9
Risk Mgmt. 313, 099 252,791 80.7
Non-Dept. 112,265 35,821 31.9
Sub-Total $4,673,284 $1, 378,412 29. 5
Contr. to Zoo Ent. 117, 774 29, 444 25.0
Contr . to CIP 249 ,000 28, 519 11. 5
Total $5,040 ,058 $1, 436 ,375 28.5
File: gnfndexp
• T
CITY OF ATASCADERO
GAS TAX
Three Months to 09-30-87
Summary
1987-1988 3 MONTH
APPROPRIATIONS ACTUAL PERCENT
REVENUE $ 255,897 $ 47, 842 18.7
EXPENDITURES 255,897 ( 11,858) * 4.6
EXCESS $ 35,984
*Includes SB-300 street overlay expenditures.
file: gstxmoac
i
CITY OF ATASCADERO
• TRAFFIC SAFETY
Three Months to 09-30-87
Summary
1987-1988 3 MONTH
APPROPRIATIONS ACTUAL PERCENT
REVENUE $ 98,349 $ 22,897 23.3
EXPENDITURES -0- -0-
EXCESS $ 22,897*
*Transferred to General Fund.
file: btrafsty
•
CITY OF ATASCADERO
REVENUE SHARING
Three Months to 09-30-87
Summary
1987-1988 3 MONTH
APPROPRIATIONS ACTUAL PERCENT
REVENUE $ 514 , 609* $ -0- -0-
EXPENDITURES 514 ,609 -0 -0-
EXCESS $ -0-
Fund Balance Contribution
file: rvshract
CITY OF ATASCADERO
LOCAL TRANSPORTATION
Three Months to 09-30-87
Summary
1987-1988 3 MONTH
APPROPRIATIONS ACTUAL PERCENT
REVENUE $ 467,439 $ 6,781 1. 5
EXPENDITURES 467, 439 ( 45,871) 9.8
DEFICIT $ ( 39,090)
file: loctrnsb
•
CITY OF ATASCADERO
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Three Months to 09-30-87
Summary
1987-1988 3 MONTH
APPROPRIATIONS ACTUAL PERCENT
REVENUE $3,682,993 $ 94,425* 2.6
EXPENDITURES 3,682,993 ( 90, 470) * 2. 5
EXCESS $ 3,955
*Includes Revenue Sharing projects
file: bcapimps
CITY OF ATASCADERO
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
REVENUE .
Three Months to 09-30-87
1987-1988 3 MONTH
BUDGET ACTUAL PERCENT
Dev. Mit. Tax $ 249, 000 $ 28, 519* 11. 5
Dev. Fees 286,500 22, 214 7.8
Amapoa-Tecorida 30 , 000 1,771 5.9
Grants 1,497,000 40,000 2.7
Contr. Fr . Others 634 , 750 1,853 0.3
Fund Balance 290 ,134 -0- -0
FAU Funds 151, 000 -0- -0-
Mnt. District 30,000 68 0.2
Rev. Sharing 514, 609 -0- -0-
Total $3, 682,993 $ 94, 425 2.6
* Transfer from General Fund
•
file: bcapimpv
CITY OF ATASCADERO •
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
EXPENDITURES
Three Months to 09-30-87
1987-1988 3 MONTH
PROJECTS APPROPRIATIONS ACTUAL PERCENT
Handicapped Ramps $ 19, 500 $ -0- -0-
Road Widenings 12, 000 -0- -0-
Maintenance District 30,000 359 1.2
Misc. Drainage Projects 73,000 1,000 1.4
Amapoa-Tecorida 30 ,000 -0- -0-
Graves Creek Bridge 300 ,000 -0- -0-
Sycamore Road Bridge 480, 000 3,116 0. 6
San Andreas Ave. Bridge 340,000 4,070 1. 2
Garcia Road Bridge 165, 000 3,888 2.4
Atascadero Creek Bridge 96,000 -0- -0-
ECR and West Mall 180, 000 4,735 2.6
Santa Rosa & West Front 100 ,000 -0- -0-
Santa Rosa and ECR 100 , 000 -0- -0-
Binding Machine 700 -0- -0-
Photocopier 1, 200 -0- -0-
Cabinets 400 -0- -0- .
Dictaphone 625 557 89.1
Pick-Up Truck (repl) 11,000 10,501 95. 5
Used Vehicle 2, 000 -0- -0-
General Plan Update 40 ,000 7,553 18.9
Pick-Up Truck (new) 11, 000 10,922 99.3
Police Computer 22,000 -0- -0-
Police Vehicles 45, 000 3, 442 7.6
Salvage Vacuum 825 -0- -0-
Desk & Chair 650 -0- -0-
Files 800 -0- -0-
Vehicle Repl. (Fire) 2, 000 -0- -0-
Recreation Computer 3,000 -0- -0-
Utility Vehicle (Parks) 9 , 800 -0- -0-
Survey Van 15,000 -0- -0-
Base Radio 1, 500 -0- -0-
Vehicle Radio 1, 000 -0- -0-
Planimeter 500 -0- -0-
Automatic Level 3,500 -0- -0-
Concrete Saw 800 -0- -0-
Mapping Reproductions 2,400 -0- -0-
Computer Software 1, 000 -0-
Paint Mixer - 3,500 -0- -0-
Ecomomic Base Study 45, 000 -0- T -0-
Fire Truck Leases 45,000 3,944 8.8
Suction/Resuscitator 1, 475 -0- -0-
Mobile Radio 2,200 -0- _ -0-
Base Radio 3, 500 -0- -0-
Engine-3 Equipment 5,600 -0- -0-
Gang Charger 755 -0- -0-
Police Facility 651,987 4,383 0.7
Lake Pavilion 50, 000 387 0.8
Paloma Creek Phase II 50 ,000 20 ,981 42. 0
Lake Improvement 200 , 000 8,140 - 4.1
Traffic Way Fields 54,000 -0- -0-
Parks Workshop 15, 000 1,891 12. 6
Group Barbeque 4,000 -0- -0-
Room Renovations 25, 600 -0- -0-
Park Light Timers 1,125 -0- -0-
P. W. Shop Building 18, 000 -0- -0-
Sidewalks 5,000 -0- -0-
Irrigation System 3, 000 601 20. 0
Admin. Bldg. Renovation 241,000 -0- -0-
Land Purchase 40 , 000 -0- -0-
BIA Proposal 10,000 -0- -0-
Babe Ruth Proposal 5, 000 -0- -0-
Contr. to Fund Balance 100,051 -0- -0-
Total $3,682,993 $ 90,470 2.5
CITY OF ATASCADERO
ZOO FUND RESERVES
Three Months to 09-30-87
Summary
1987-1988 3 MONTH
APPROPRIATIONS ACTUAL
REVENUE -0- $ 870
EXPENDITURES -0- (1,048)
DEFICIT $ (178)
file: bzoofund
0
CITY OF ATASCADERO
ZOO ENTERPRISE FUND
Three Months to 09-30-87
Summary
1987-1988 3 MONTH
APPROPRIATIONS ACTUAL PERCENT
REVENUE $192,274 $ 42, 765 22.2
EXPENDITURES 192,274 (38,974) 20.3
EXCESS $ 3,791
r
file: bzooent
CITY OF ATASCADERO
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT #4
REVENUE .
Three Months to 09-30-87
Bond Proceeds
3 MONTH
REVENUE ACTUAL
Redemption Fund $ 8,614
Reserve Fund -0-
Construction Fund $ -0-
$ 8,614
EXPENDITURES (400 , 687)
DEFICIT $ (392, 073) *
*FY86-87 Carryover is in excess of $600,000
file: basmtdst
• CITY OF ATASCADERO
WASTEWATER TREATMENT
Three Months to 09-30-87
Summary
1987-1988 3 MONTH
APPROPRIATIONS ACTUAL PERCENT
REVENUE $ 939,279 $ 70, 381 7. 5
EXPENDITURES 1,183,280 (102, 479) 8.7
DEFICIT $ (32,098)
file: wswatmtm
ISI
e
ADMINISTRATION BUILDING , -�.f��(�/j( [ /_ y,. /•/
POST OFFICE BOX 747
ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA 93423 POLICE DEPARTMENT
PHONE: (805) 466-8000
POST OFFICE BOX 747
ATASCADERO,CALIFORNIA 93423
CITY COUNCIL PHONE: (805) 466.8600
CITY CLERK tasea elC®,
• CITY TREASURER +•
INCORPORATED JULY 2. 1979
CITY MANAGER
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT.DEPARTMENT 6005 LEWIS AVENUE
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA 93422
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
PHONE: (805) 466-2141
October 7, 1987
To: Members of City Council
From: Boyd C. Sharitz, City Clerk
Subject : MAYOR ELECTION PROCESS
By direction of City Council this office conducted an advertised
Public Survey thru the local newspapers on the above titled subject.
Forms returned by mail or in person totaled: - $2 votes for Retain
present system, and 168 votes for Changed to an elected process.
• The above excludes : - 12 votes for retaining present system, and
85 votes for Changed to elected process. These were challenged at
a Council meeting when presented to this office in person by an in-
terested citizen who had copies made and handed them out himself.
However, should you consider both the above tallies the outcome is
totaled as:- 72 votes for retain, and 253 for change to an elected.
process.
It has been my pleasure to serve you in this matter, if we may be
of further service advise.
R
Boyd C. Shari
City Clerk
Cy:Files
•
•
MEMORANDUM
To: - Honorable Mayor and City Council
Through: Michael Shelton, City Manager
From: Paul Sensibaugh, Director of Public Works/CityEngineer
Subject : Traffic Committee Appointments
Date : October 5, 1987
Recommendation:
Staff recommends that staff advertise for citizens to submit
their interest of serving on the Traffic Committee to the Director
of Public Works and that the Director set up interviews before the
Traffic Committee so that the Committee can recommend a candidate
to the Council ; and that Council appoint a council member to the
committee for 1987-88.
Backround:
The Traffic Committee consists of one (1) Councilmember, three
(3) Staff members and two (2) Citizens—at—large . The Council
member serves for a one—year term but may be reappointed with no
limit on the number of reappointments . Staff members serve
continuously for the duration of their employment and consist of
the Director of Public Works, Chairman, the Director of Community
Development and the Police Chief, or their representatives . The
citizens serve staggered two—year terms with a new appointment
annually. Citizens may n@t serve two (2) consecutive two—year
terms.
Discussion:
The open citizen position is currently occupied by Bill Heath.
Bill has been a valuable asset to the Traffic Committee and has
contributed to the technical aspects of committee decisions . Bill
is also the District Traffic Engineer for Caltrans .
•
Other options open to Council for the Citizen appointment are :
(1) Council selection after council interviews .
(2) Council appointment without interviews . (original concept)
(3) Use of a nominating committee other than the Traffic
Committee . (not favored by staff)
(4) Recommendation from Staff .
(5) Recommendation from the Traffic Committee without
interviews.
The present Councilmember serving on the committee is Barbara
Norris and the alternate is Marjori Mackey.
Fiscal Impact :
This is a volunteer position.
•
•
MEMORANDUM
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
Through: Michael Shelton, City Manager
From: Paul M. Sensibaugh, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Subject : 19V-88 Resurfacing Program (Street Overlay)
Date : October 5, 1987
Recommendation:
Staff recommends that Council award the annual resurfacing bid to
Madonna Construction of San Luis Obispo in the ammount of $423, 105 .84,
llowing the Director of Public Works to adjust the quantities to
reflect the monies available.
Backround:
The annual resurfacing project is normally bid so that the
overlay can preceed the winter rains . This year there is no
"Maintenance District" work but the City is doing a joint venture with
developers to improve Llano Road to City Standards . Llano was
scheduled to be overlayed this year and would have gone through the
typical preparation by City crews . However, due to a suggestion by
the Planning Commission the Llano work was coordinated with a
conditioned development (Drake) and a future development (Davis) to
make a better finished product.
Discussion:
The work represents about 10% more that the normal 10 miles of
paving (has varied from 8 to 12 miles dependent upon the width of the
streets) . A list of the streets involved is attached. A bid summary
is also attached for your reference .
Madonna Construction received the bid last year and some problems
were encountered with the equipment and manpower allocated to the .
Atascadero job. These issues will be discussed in detail with the
Aftcontractor prior to signing the agreement . It is expected that we
iqWwill receive appropriate cooperation.
Fiscal Impact: •
The budget shows about $365,000 appropriated for the annual
project but did not include any carryover funds or interest earnings
which may not be known until the audit is completed. If this
information is not known or estimated by the mid-point of the work
then the work will be cut back to the original ammount . Last year
approximately $400, 000 was expended on resurfacing. It is difficult
to estimate the correct amount at budget time but there is very
little fluxation in the Gas Tax and Transit funding formulae . Santa
Lucia may have to be carried over until next year.
•
BID SUMMARY PROJECT: 1987-88 OVERLAY
ittri#f###iif##i#if##f####r##f####ts#tf#trot#t######t#t###########f#s#f#itfftfstttt#ii##fff##tt#ii#tttt###s##tf##tt##ttzf####tf#iz###ftfff
# BIDDER t MADONNA CONSTRUCTION i M.J. HERMRECK, INC. t R. BURKE CORP. t MICHAEL FREDERICK t
szfz#f##iuftftfsttt####fr#f#tf###t###itttfsist##izittisztt#ttst##f#i#ittz#sttttztttsitstzii######tttt#tuft#it##f#ttiit##ti##ft#izz##iffz#
t ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY x UNIT PRICE = TOTAL x UNIT PRICE = TOTAL x UNIT PRICE = TOTAL x UNIT PRICE = TOTAL t
f#iii#i##i##si#r#1####sft#sr#tt#rft#tits#ttt##f#it##hitt######ts##tit#ft#f#fits#tt###fists###ttstr#f##s#stfsittt#t#fs#i#i#tf##f#f##t####is#
I l 2-TYPE B AC T 15,431.38 x $25.73 4397,049.41 x 425.50 =$393,500.19 x $26.00 =$401,215.88 x 426.75 =$412,789.42 t
1 2 TACK COAT T 56.43 x $1.00 = $56.43 x $200.00 = $11,286.00 x $250.00 = $14,107.50 x $300.00= $16,929.00 #
# 3 ADJUST MH EA 61.00 x $200.00 = $12,200.00 x $165.00 = $10,065.00 x $190.00 = $11,590.00 x $250.00 = $15,250.00 t
f 4 ADJUST MON EA 39.00 x $100.00 = $3,900.00 x $140.00 = $5,460.00 x $120.00 = $4,680.00 x $150.00 = $5,850.40 1
t 5 SUR MON EA 39.00 x $100.00 = $3,900.00 x $140.00 = $5,460.00 x $80.00 = $3,120.00 x $150.00 = $5,850.00 t
t 6 PAVE MARK LS LUMP SUM x $6,000.00 = $6,000.00 x $11,000.00 = $11,000.00 x $12,600.00 = $12,600.00 x$10,681.00 = $10,681.00 f
##rtrttttf:ft#rrrist##t#r##tir#tr#tt#tirtttiit#tt####rrtt###i#Piz#ttt#tt#####tttizi###rr#trtz#rtztttt##tt#ftrt##fir###rz#ztr#itrztrzz##zrttt
I TOTAL BID 1 $423}405.84 t $436,771.19 t $447,313.38 r $467,349.42 f
firirzi#r#fffiizizf#t##ttz##t##rzt#ttt#ttt#tint:##iz#ztt#ztf#rttttt#t#ttt#iitttf##trttrtzit#iittt#zi#titt##ft#tt#iii#ri####r#tint#t##ztztt
LOW BID
##ft##rr#t##ritr##t##fr###tit#rt#ttt#t#trot##r#tt##z#rt#z##z##t###s###t#tt##t##t#st######tt###t#ttiit#fir#r#hitt
I BIDDER f A.J. DIANI CONST.,INC. t HAROLD D. PETERSON f ENSINEER'S ESTIMATE t
t#iir#r####r####t##t##rt##r#tritttsritrt#zrttrr#tittrttiititt#ttt#trt##ri#it#tt#t##Piz#rtrrtttrrrrtritrttrzt#rrtt
I ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY x UNIT PRICE = TOTAL x UNIT PRICE = TOTAL x UNIT PRICE = TOTAL t
istitr#t#f#Pts#rtt#rr#i#rr#iz#tt##zrt#tstr##zt##tzttsrr#ttttttt#rtttiizt#r#trtrtt#t#t##tftttttt#t#crit#tart#r
2-TYPE B AC T 15,431..18 x $23.52 =$362,946.06 x $36.00 4555,529.68 x $27.00 =$416,641.25 f
t 2 TACK COAT T 56.43 x $673.40 = $37,999.96 x $320.00 = $18,057.60 x = $0.00 r
1 3 ADJUST MH EA 61.00 x $118.00 = $7,198.00 x $.320.00 = $49,520.00 x = $0.00 r
t 4 ADJUST MON EA 39.00 x $118.00 = $4,602.00 x $192.00 = $7,488.00 x = $0.00 r
1 5 SUR MON EA 39.00 x $200.00 = $7,800.00 x $43.00 = $1,677.00 x = $0.00 t
t 6 PAVE MARK LS LUMP SUM x $57,000.00 = $57,000.00 x $11,458.00 =$11,458.00 x = $0.00 t
ri#rs###ffsitfts##sft#tsssssis#situ##tiiistiitt##ttiitti##iisffsiss#t#stt#f#s#si#sstitit#ttittsttzftsiitttstssti
I TOTAL BID # $477,546.02 r $613,730.2B t $416,647.26 t
sfris#tssttsssit#stt##sttttitstss#ttfsiistit##tits#iss#iiits#sssssit#tttitttst�iittsfiisstzitifssfsstftsttsssstsi
1987-88 OVERLAY PROGRAM
1. Valle Avenue - Curbaril to end
2. Sinaloa Avenue - Pueblo to Curbaril
3. Pueblo Avenue - Sombrilla to E1 Camino Real
4. Santa Barbara Road - El Camino Real to Atascadero Ave
5. Alcantara - All
6. San Andres - Marchant to Santa Lucia
7. Santa Rosa - Highway 41 to Highway 101
8. Old Santa Rosa Road - All
9. Carmelita - Portola to San Andres
10. Atascadero Avenue - From Santa Rosa .4 miles
11. San Clemente - San Marcos to Portola
12. Bella Vista Road - San Marcos .5 miles
13. Los Gatos - San Marcos to Santa Lucia
14. Flores Road - Santa Luica to Los Gatos
15. Cascabel - Santa Lucia to end
16. Santa Lucia - Llano to end - 2.4 Miles.
MEMORANDUM
To: Mayor and City Council
Through: Michael Shelton, City Manager
From: Paul M. Se ib Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Subject : Authorization to bid Monterey Bridge over Graves Creek
Date : October 1 , 1987
Recommendation:
Staff recommends that Council authorize the Public Works Director
to approve the plans and specifications and to advertise for bids for
the Monterey Road-Graves Creek bridge project .
Backround:
This project is one of four bridges in the present budget that
has received an 80% Federal Aid-Highway Act grant being administered
by Caltrans . The project was designed by Bischel & Karns of
Sacramento. The project will remove the existing bridge and erect a
wider and longer single span reinforced concrete deck bridge;
including a pedestrian walkway on the school side of the street .
Discussion:
There was what is called a "design exception" requested by the
State to place an extended guard rail into an area outside the present
right-of-way near the tree farm that is now being finalized. Also,
the environmental study has drawn attention to a historical site under
the present Monterey Rd. Elementary School grounds . Although
additional attention has been directed toward this issue, clearance is
expected very soon. There are a few other incidental paperwork loose
ends that are being resolved with Caltrans, otherwise the project is
esentially ready to bid.
Fiscal Impact :
The estimated cost of the total project with engineering is
approximately $325, 000 with the City 'participation of 20%, or
$65, 000 . This money is budgeted in the 1987-88 C. I .P. budget .
PLEASE ADD INTO YOUR SPNCIL PACKET JOETING: 10/13/87
ITEMS: D-3,4, AND 5
• M E M O R A N D U M
TO: City Council Members October 13, 1987
FROM: Michael Shelton
-City Manager
SUBJECT: SALARY AND BENEFIT INCREASES
Enclosed in your agenda packet for the October 13, 1987 Council
Meeting are resolutions providing salary and benefit increases
for the Department Heads, Confidential Clerical Employees, and
myself. A brief analysis of the three resolutions follow:
Department Heads
A basic two year proposal is presented, with all issues being
defined with the expection of setting fiscal year 1988/89 cost
of living salaries and possible consideration of retirement
benefit enhancement for the Police and Fire Chief as Public
Safety Employees.
Fiscal Year 1987/88 salary and benefit increases, without equity
• adjustment, will cost the City 4.9%. Equity adjustments for
four of the six Department Heads for part year will cost an
additional 1.71% for a total budget impact of 6.61%.
Confidential Employees
A two year proposal ' is presented for Confidential Clerical
Employees. The proposal provides the same benefits as provided
to all other City Clerical employees plus providing a 5%
confidential- differential, phased over 2 years. The confidential
differential is awarded to these employees, as they do not have
the right to belong to a bargaining unit for the "meet and confer
process"
Fiscal year 1987/88 salary and benefit increases, including the
confidential differential for part year , will cost 6 .1% .
City Manager
A one year proposal is presented. The proposal provides the
same benefits as proposed for Department Heads in fiscal year
1987/88. Fiscal year 1987/88 salary and benefit increases will
cost 4.9%.
Recommendation - •
City Council adopt the resolutions providing the proposed
increases for Department Heads, Confidential Clerical Employees,
and the City Manager.
MS:kv
File: MCMSAL
_NDA
Y
• RESOLUTION NUMER 106-87
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO
AMENDING RESOLUTIONS 21-85 AND 112-86
CITY MANAGER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, on March 18, 1985 , Michael B. Shelton, City Manager,
entered into an employment agreement with the City of Atascadero;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to amend the terms and
conditions of the agreement.
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT:
Section 4 - Compensation of Employee - Section 4 is amended
providing:
Section 4.1 - Base salary, in effect on June 30, 1987, shall be
increased by two and three quarter percent (2-3/4%) , effective
July 4, 1987.
• Section 4.2 - Base salaries in effect on December 31, 1987, shall
be increased by three and one quarter percent (3-1/4%) , effective
January 2, 1988.
Section 21 - Cafeteria Plan - Section 21 is added, providing
for Fiscal Year 1987/88 $200.00 available for selection from a
list of benefit options.
Benefit options (cafeteria list) available are:
a. Dues and fees for civic club membership
b. Vision Insurance
C. Additional administrative leave
10 additional hours - 1987-88
20 additional hours - 1988-89
d. Annual physical exam
e. Tuition and books for University courses
f. Contribution to deferred compensation program
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that modification included in
previous amendments to the employment agreement, not superseeded,
are continued.
On motion by Council member and seconded •
by Council Member the foregoing resolution is
hereby adopted in its entirety on the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ADOPTED:
ATTEST: CITY OF ATASCADERO
BOYD C. SHARITZ BARBARA NORRIS
City Clerk Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
JEFFREY G. JORGENSEN
City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
i
MICHAEL B. SHEL ON
City Manager
•
IDA
RESOLUTION
•
RESOLUTION 103-87
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF ATASCADERO
ADOPTING A SALARY/CLASSIFICATION SCHEDULE
AND BENEFITS FOR
MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES
SECTION 1. SALARIES
1.1 Base salaries in effect on 30 June 1987 shall be increased
by two and three-quarter percent (2 3/4%) effective
July 4, 1987.
1.2 Base salaries in effect on 31 December 1987 shall be in-
creased by three and one-quarter percent (3 1/4%) effective
January 2, 1988.
1.3 Equity Adjustments - To pay wages comparable to the average
of other cities in the County for similar positions. These
adjustments will be made over a two year period as follows:
Effective January 1, 1988
• Admin. Services Director 5. 84%
Community Development Director 4.45%
Parks & Recreation Director 4.82%
Police Chief 5.47%
Effective January 1, 1989
Admin. Services Director 5. 84%
Community Development Director 4.45%
Parks & Recreation Director 4.82%
Police Chief 5.47%
1.4 A cost of living adjustment effective July 1, 1988 will be
granted after negotiations for other employee units have
been completed.
SECTION 2. MEDICAL/DENTAL BENEFITS
2.1 The City shall pay all medical and dental benefit premiums
for the employee and dependents.
2.2 Those employees without dependents or who choose not to
enroll their dependents in the' City plan will r-ece-ive the
amount of the dependent premium as an addition to his/her --
regular pay. -
SECTION 3. ADMINISTRATIVE LEAVE
• 3.1 The City shall grant five (5) days of Administrative Leave
to be taken during Fiscal Year 1987-88.
3. 2 Administrative Leave hours will be available to each
employee effective July lst annually.
3.3 Time not used by June 30th annually, shall be forfeited. •
SECTION 4. RETIREMENT
4.1 The City shall continue to pay the employee monthly contri-
bution (7% of base salary) to the Public Employees Retire-
ment System (PERS) .
4.2 City will request and pay for an actuarial study to be per-
formed by the PERS to determine the cost of implementing
a 2% @ 50 retirement plan for Safety employees. Such study
to be requested in September, but to use a, 1 July 1988
effective date for analysis purpose.
4.3 City agrees it has no philosophical opposition to 2% @ 50.
4.4 City agrees to negotiate 2% @ 50 during the next negotia-
tions, if such plan is proposed by the Safety employees.
City makes no promise to agree to 2% @ 50. City agrees,
however, that agreement to 2% @ 50 is merely an economic
problem. If the economics can be agreed to, then 2% @ 50
can be implemented for Safety employees.
SECTION 5. LIFE INSURANCE
5.1 The City shall maintain a term life insurance policy on
each employee in the amount of Fifty-Thousand Dollars
($50,000) and the City shall pay the full premium amount
for such coverage.
5.2 The City shall maintain a term life insurance policy for
each eligible dependent of the employee in the amount of
One Thousand Dollars ($1,000) per dependent and the City •
shall pay the full premium amount for such coverage.
SECTION 6. SICK LEAVE ACCRUAL
6.1 There will be no maximum limit on the amount of sick leave
an employee may accumulate.
SECTION 7. CAFETERIA PLAN
7.1 For Fiscal Year 1987-1988, $200.00 is available to each
department head to be used to select from a list of bene-
fit options (see 7.3) .
7.2 Beginning on July 1, 1988, the amount available for each
department head will be increased to $400 for Fiscal Year
1988-1989 .
7.3 The benefit options (cafeteria list) available are:
a. Dues and fees for civic club membership
b. Vision Insurance
c. Additional administrative leave
10 additional hours 1987-1988
20 additional hours 1988-1989
d. Annual physical exam
e. Tuition and books for University courses T
f. Contribution to deferred compensation program
SECTION 8. AUTO ALLOWANCE
8.1 The City shall pay a monthly vehicle allowance of $175.00
per month to the Director of Community Development, the
Director of Parks and Recreation, and the Director of
Administrative Services. The Director of Public Works
shall be paid $200.00 per month.
On motion by Councilperson and seconded
by Councilperson , the foregoing resolution is
hereby adotped in its entirety on the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ADOPTED:
CITY OF ATASCADERO
By:
BARBARA NORRIS, Mayor
ATTEST:
BOYD C. SHARITZ, City Clerk
PREPARED BY:
DAVI G J RGENSEN, Director of Administrative Services
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
J_
MICHAEL SHELTO , City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
JEFFREY G. JORGENSEN, City Attorney
•
L'0-0.,
JA-)//2/77r _r• ;z
RESOLUTION 104-87
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF ATASCADERO
ADOPTING A SALARY/CLASSIFICATION SCHEDULE
AND BENEFITS FOR
- CONFIDENTIAL EMPLOYEES
SECTION 1. SALARIES
1.1 Base salaries in effect on 30 June 1987 shall be increased
by three percent (3%) effective 4 July 1987.
1. 2 Base salaries in effect on 31 December 1987 shall be in-
creased by two percent (2%) effective 2 January 1988.
1.3 Effective the first day of the first full pay period in
July 1988, employees shall receive a salary increase
which shall be determined by the Los Angeles/Anahiem/
Riverside, Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers, May
to May (printed by the BLS on about 25 June 1988) ,
Consumer Price Index.
• The salary increase shall equal the full percentage change
of the CPI-W up to five percent (5%) plus one-half of the
full percentage change above five percent (5%) .
Therefore, full CPI-W up to 5% + 1/2 of CPI=W over 5% is
5% + 0.8% ( (6.6 - 5.0 = 1. 6; (1. 6)/2 = 0. 8) ) = 5.8%
SECTION 2. CONFIDENTIAL COMPENSATION
2.1 Confidential Employees shall receive a five percent (5%)
differential over their base salary. This differential
shall be implemented as follows:
Effective January 1, 1988 two and one-half percent
(2 1/2%) over base salary. Effective July 1, 1988 an
additional two and one-half percent (2 1/2%) , for a
total of five percent (5%) , over base salary for each
classification.
SECTION 3. HEALTH INSURANCE
3.1 The City agrees to continue to' provide -the current- medical
and dental -benefits. --
3. 2 The City Employee Medical Insurance Committee may recommend `
changes to the level of service and service providers
during the term of this agreement.
3.3 The City shall continue to pay 100% of employee costs for
insurance premiums.
3.4 The City shall pay 50% of dependent cost increases.
SECTION 4. VISION INSURANCE •
4.1 The City shall provide employee only vision insurance at no
cost to employee.
SECTION 5. TERM LIFE INSURANCE
5.1 City shall maintain a term life insurance policy for each
employee in a total amount of Fifteen Thousand Dollars
($15,000) and shall pay all premiums for such policy.
5.2 Effective July 1, 1988 the City shall maintain a term life
insurance policy for each employee in a total amount of
Twenty Thousand Dollars ($20, 000) and shall pay all
premiums for such policy.
5.3 The City shall maintain a term life insurance policy for
each eligible dependent of the employee in the amount of
One Thousand Dollars ($1,000) per dependent and the City
shall pay the full premium amount for such coverage.
SECTION 6. SICK LEAVE
6.1 An employee may use sick leave for the care of relatives
who are ill, injured or pregnant and who are living in the
employee' s household.
SECTION 7 . STATE DISABILITY INSURANCE
7.1 City shall provide State Disability Insurance at a cost
to employee.
On motion by Councilperson and seconded •
by Councilperson , the foregoing resolution is
hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ADOPTED:
CITY OF ATASCADERO
By:
BARBARA NORRIS, Mayor
ATTEST:
BOYD C. SHARITZ, City Clerk p
Resolution 104-87 cont.
PREPARED BY:
. 0 1,U"'
DAVI J I
RGENSEN, Director of Administrative Services
APPROVE7 AS TO CONTENT:
1�' �kjt;z=
M CHAEL SHELTON, City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
JEFFREY G. JORGENSEN, City Attorney
.' . .. , li ---�-
MEMORANDUM
To: City Council
Through: Michael Shelton, City Manager ,
From: Paul M. Sensibaugh. Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Subject : Bordeaux House Sanitary Sewer Bypass
Date : September 25, 1987
Recommendation:
Staff recommends that Bordeaux proceed with the southside sewer
project with the staff-initiated design changes as described below
and that any costs above the conditioned limit be taken from the
Paid annexation fee.
*Backround:
The sanitary sewer bypass which was conditioned for the
Bordeaux House-Vandenberg project will run from E1 Camino Real to
the Wastewater Treatment Plant via La Linia and must be installed
prior to occupation of Phase I . This project was privately bid last
week and two bids were received.
Discussion:
The original design has been altered twice by the City Engineer
to accomodate increased storage capacity of the main lift station
near the State Hospital and the Septic Tank Dump at the Wastewater
Plant .
The main lift station was re-analysed to assure that no
downstream lines are surcharged (not flowing more than full) with
the future flow. At the same time a one-hour emergency storage
capacity was added to handle the maximum gravity flow plus 150 gpm
which is expected from private lift stations .
•
At the same time the problems with the Septic Tank Dump were •
becoming more evident and dumping procedures were being questioned
by nearby residences . Although that facility will undergo a
redesign on its own merit, the southside sewer was revised to come
into the Plant prior to the Septic Tank Dump and a new set of
grinders smaller than the existing were added. Additionally, the
designwill extend the life o,f the larger existing grinders by
reducing the flow demand through them.
Fiscal Impact :
The above changes fit into the overall plan to ready our plant
and systems for the buildout flow capacity. The changes are beyond
the scope of the Bordeaux condition, however. Bordeaux was required
to construct the southside bypass, including the upgrading of lift
station No. 2, up to the amount of $350, 000 ,
The preliminary estimate made by John Wallace & Assoc . was
$327,500 not including engineering and without grinders . Yamabe and
Horn (Vandenberg' s engineering consultant) estimated $300, 500 not
including engineering and with only $10, 000 for a grinder. Both
estimates were prior to the final design changes .
The actual bids came in at $371 ,418 from Align Construction and
$372,986 from Beaver Construction with $60, 138 and $61 , 000,
respectively included in the above for the valve and grinder •
assembly. The engineering by Yamabe and Horn will reach
approximately $40,500 including inspection, surveying and soils
work. The total bill without the valve and grinder assembly is
$351 ,780 or slightly above the $350, 000 Bordeaux limit, and includes
the additional expansion of Lift Station No. 2 and a new lift station
near the railroad tracks at the golf course .
Bordeaux also paid $318, 000 in annexation fees which are to be
used for future expansion of the sewage treatment plant and mainline
lift stations . Staff suggests that the project proceed with the
added requirements to accomodate the grinders, the Septic Tank Dump
effluent and the larger Lift Station No. 2 and that the cost over the
$350,000 condition be taken from the $318, 000 annexation fee .
Unless change orders occur, which will be highly scrutinized by
staff, approximately $62, 000 will be needed from the annexation fee
and a balance of approximately $256, 000 of the annexation fee will
remain available for future plant and system expansion.
( It is interesting to note that the total contribution by
Bordeaux is $668, 000 and if they were to pay today ' s sew
er ee
f s it
would be $662,400 . ) -
•
•
MEMORANDUM
To: The Board of Directors of the Atascadero County San. Dist .
Through: Michael Shelton, City Manager '
From: Paul M. Sensibaugh, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Subject : Awards for Sewer Cleaning and TV-Monitoring ( I & I )
Date : October 5, 1987
Recommendation:
W
Staff recommends that The Board award the Sewer Cleaning bid to
Ilton Simon of Florence, Arizona in the amount of $54, 012 .80, and
that the TV-Monitoring bid be carried over to the next regular
meeting.
Backround:
Prior to the end of the last fiscal year the Board authorized
staff to advertise for for the I & I analysis that would include
Sewer Cleaning, TV-Monitoring and perhaps Smoke Testing and Dye
Testing of the sewer lines . Due to the exit of the Senior Civil
Engineer at that time theworkload was shifted and the specifications
were not completed until the end of August .
Discussion:
The sewer cleaning can be performed at any time but it is
advantageous to conduct the TV-Monitoring during wet weather. It
appears that the above internal delay will work to the City' s
advantage since the line cleaning should be finished in December. The
TV-Monitoring will follow immediately-, and in some cases concurently
with, the cleaning of parts of the system.
The apparent low bidder for the TV-Monitoring is Eagl-e Cam of -San
Luis Obispo but the award is being delayed to assure that they can .
meet the intent of the specifications . References are being checked
•since they have only been in business for 8 months . The next low bid
was about $8500 higher.
Fiscal Impact : •
The Engineer's Estimate is based on 100% of' the lines to be
cleaned and 75% of the lines to be inspected by TV, plus 10% of the
lines smoke tested and about 2 1/2% dye tested. Actual quantities
will be determined in the field as approved by the City Engineer.
The bids were very favorable and are particularily good for the
City since it was based on a pick—and—choose of the items that would
be awarded to each bidder. The bidders also had a chance to enter a
deduct if awarded all items .
The combined apparent low bid is $89, 652 .80 but the final amount
will be based on actual quantities completed which could be greater
than or less than the above . A complete Bid Summary is attached for
your reference . $250, 000 has been set aside for this project which
includes $150,000 in improvements to the sewer system as reflected in
this year' s budget . The latter work is dependent upon the results of
the above I & I analysis.
•
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
BID SUMMARY
PROJECT: SEWER CLEANING-TV MONITORING
# BIDDER # MILTON SIMON t EAGLE-CAM # CYCLOPS # CAN-SCAN (BLOIS) t
I ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY x UNIT PRICE = TOTAL x UNIT PRICE = TOTAL x UNIT PRICE = TOTAL x UNIT PRICE = TOTAL t
# 1 JET CLEAN L.F. 191,189.00 x $0.20 = $38,237.80 x = $0.00 x = $0.00 x $0.24= $45,885.36 t
! 2 SWAB,BUCKET L.F. 63,100.00 x $0.25 = $15,775.00 x = $0.00 x = $0.00 x $0.24 = $15,144.00 t
# 3 TV-MONITOR L.F. 142,560.00 x $0.35 = $49,896.00 x $0.25 = $35,640.00 x $0.31 = $44,193.60 x $0.35 = $49,896.00 t
t 4 SMOKE TEST L.F. 20,000.00 x $0.15 = N/A x = x $0.25 = x t
# 5 DYE TEST L.F. 5,000.00 x $0.10 = N/A x = x $0.25 = x = t
# TOTAL BID # $103,908.80 t $35,640.00 t $44,193.60 # $110,925.36 t
LOW BID-CLEANING LOW BID-TV MONITORING
# BIDDER t t # # ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE t
# EM DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY x UNIT PRICE = TOTAL x UNIT PRICE = TOTAL x UNIT PRICE = TOTAL x UNIT PRICE = TOTAL x
JET CLEAN L.F. 191,189.00 x = $0.00 x = $0.00 x = $0.00 x $0.235 = $44,929.42 x
1 2 SWAB,BUCKET L.F. 63,100.00 x = $0.00 x = $0.00 x = $0.00 x $0.380 = $23,978.00 x
t 3 TV-MONITOR L.F. 142,560.00 x = $0.00 x = $0.00 x = $0.00 x $0.370 = $52,747.20 x
! 4 SMOKE TEST L.F. 20,000.00 x = $0.00 x = $0.00 x = $0.00 x $0.150 = $3,000.00 x
# 5 DYE TEST L.F. 5,000.00 x = $0.00 x = $0.00 x = $0.00 x $0.150 = $750.00 x
I TOTAL BID t $0.00 # $0.00 # $0.00 # $125,404.62 t
MILTON 5IMON LOW BID-CLEANING $54,0I2.80
EAGLE CAM LOW BID-TV MONITORING $35,640.00
TOTAL COMBINED LOW BIDS $89,652.80
MEMORANDUM
TO: BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ATASCADERO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
THROUGH: MIKE SHELTON, CITY MANAGER ,
FROM: PAUL M. SENSIBAUGH
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER
SUBJECT : INFLOW AND INFILTRATION ANALYSIS
PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION
DATE: MAY 5 , 1987
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board authorize the Director of
Public Works to advertise for bids for the cleaning, tv-
monitoring, and smoke testing for the existing sewer system as
presented in the current budget .
BACKGROUND:
The sewer study conducted by John Wallace and Associates as
well as the grant facilities plan presented by Engineering
Sciences expressed the importance of an inflow and infiltration
(I & I) analysis and implementation to increase the life of the
wastewater treatment plant . The I & I analysis was somewhat
informally done in-house since the start of the fiscal year . A
normal cleaning schedule has been layed out by sanitation
personnel and an investigation of services available, as well as
associated costs , was conducted by the Director .
The winter of 1985 showed an increase in discharge to the
plant of 3.7 times the average daily flow during the rainy
season . Normal infiltration is about 20% with peaks up to about
2 . 0 times the average daily flow. The current average daily
flow is approximately 1 . 0 million gallons per day (mgd) . Thus ,
about 2 .7 mgd of the peak flow of 3 .7 in 1985 , which came after
the sewer study had indicated 3 .2 as a historic figure,
represents storm water intrusion .
The storm water enters via joints or cracks in the sewers
' (infiltration) , or into manhole lids or manhole joints/cracks or
other inlets (inflow) . The latter , or other inlets , could be
street or parking lot storm drains , roof drains or a drainage
• 0
open channel finding its way along a sewer trench to a large
crack or opening.
DISCUSSION;
The problem is clear ; the solutions are less obvious since
the cause of the problem is an unknown . Cleaning of the lines ,
which has never been completely done except for problem areas
due to minimal slope, is the first step in the process .
Cleaning not only readies the lines for the tv-monitoring but
can give a good idea of which areas should be monitored. Areas
of large breaks and sags may be detected by cleaning by the type
of draggings such as sand or pieces of pipe.
Tv-monitoring can locate exactly any cracks , joints , storm
drain inlets , roof drain inlets , etc . The records from this
process are invaluable for future reference . Smoke testing can
also be conducted to find sources of roof drains or other
illegal taps .
The above processes will help determine not only where and
what the problem is , but whether it is more economical to fix
the problem or to expand the plant to accept the water . It is
noted here that not only does non-polluted water use up mainline
and plant capacity and make treatment more difficult due to
dilution, but it is illegal by our own rule to allow such
acceptance of flow.
Staff is recommending to bid the project on unit prices
with an estimated quantity that can be controlled by the `
Director as work progresses . Contractors will bid on cleaning,
tv-monitoring, and smoke testing and may be awarded as few as
one or as much as all items . Thus two or more different
contractors may be awarded the bid based upon their expertise
and price of work. All work will be based upon a linear footage
of sewer main . It is the intent to clean the entire system but
to only tv-monitor the- areas designated by the Director .
Actual corrections to the system will be conducted in the
next fiscal year based upon the results of the above project .
It should be understood that sometimes problem sources can be
found that cannot easily be corrected, and in that sence their
is somewhat of a risk to overdoing the tv-monitoring.
Corrections may include removing illegal roof drains ,
elimination of storm drains , water proofing manholes , sealing
cracks in sewer main joints , , slip lining sewer mains or
completely removing and replacing inadequate lines . It is
anticipated that the bulk of the work will be necessary in the
older downtown section of the system where the sewers are slip
joints and roof drains are evident . Flat areas such as Morro
Flats is suspect of drainage I & I especially when the ground is
saturated.
FISCAL ANALYSIS ;
There are over 38 miles , or over 200, 000 linear feet , of
sewer mains . Cleaning and bucketing ranges from 20 cent
s/l , f .
to 27 c/l . f , with root cutting as much as 40 c/l . f. Tv-
monitoring is estimated from 30 c/l . f , to 50 c/l . f . , and smoke
testing about 15 c/l . f.
If the entire system was done for all items the price could
reach about $150, 000 . It is anticipated that all of the sewer
will be cleaned and only about half will be tv-monitored and
perhaps only 25% smoke tested. The estimate for that work is
about $90, 000. The budget includes $250, 000 . The balance of
funds will carry over into the next budget year' s corrective
items . The current sewer fee structure includes I & I work,
future line replacement and expansion, sludge handling, and
future lift station and plant improvement and replacement . The
above work fits into the build-out projection used to establish
the fees .
i
•� ,�'i � �• s�uosa�ee '�f1t�,lrSSuON,XS� i
y_ uat.n
a
.r:�'''�'i71+.�,.,} t}'^ice' •�` �-.- '��.-' V.� "`�n"ir. _ _
.��--tea` '+.•���.
■ woke
INFILTRATION/INFLOW surveys used smoke testing for identification of manhole frame seal inflow sources.
CO2.5-1
and Sk td9h, . i i
on
WILLIAM C. CARTER, P.E. discharge to receiving streams during lation of flow meters and rain gauges
RICHARD J. NOGAJ, P.E. moderate rainfall events for the past were selected. Flow monitoring was
and 30 years. Construction of about performed at 45 key locations
ALAN J. HOLLENBECK, P.E. 250,000 linear ft of supplemental relief throughout the Mission Township dis-
sewers and three side stream holding trict while rainfall monitoring was
Mr. Carter is senior engineer with the facilities in the 1960s and a voluntary conducted at two locations. Flow
Johnson County Unified Wastewater Dis- downspout disconnection program in meters and rain gauges were oper-
tricts,Johnson County,Kansas.Mr.Nogaj the 1970s did not prevent sewer ated from mid-March 1984 to mid-
is president and Mr. Hollenbeck is an as- backups or the discharge of untreated June, 1984. Theo eration of wet
sociate with RJN Environmental As- P
sociates, Inc., Consulting Engineers, Wastewater into the receiving weather holding stations and activity
Wheaton, Illinois. streams. In addition, the connection of sewer bypasses were also
and discharge of many of the monitored. Flow data were used to
OMMUNITIES and sewer agen- downspouts remains unknown. evaluate system behavior and to de-
cies needing sewer improve- In an effort to provide improved termine the base wastewater flow
ments have been reluctant to under- sanitary sewer service to JCUWD (dry weather/low ground water),infil-
take major sewer rehabilitation pro- customers and to reduce the bypass- tration (dry weather/high ground
grams largely due to the cost to quan- ing of wastewater into the receiving water) and inflow (wet weather/high
tify the need and the lack of funds streams, JCUWD retained RJN En- grount water) quantities.
needed to implement the required vironmental Associates, Inc. to con- -Base, infiltration, and inflow rates
improvements. Also, in many cases duct an initial sanitary sewer study of were determined from the monitored
sewer studies have not resulted in on- MTMSD No. 1. Project objectives data.Initially,inflow rates that would
going survey and maintenance activi- were established to: identify existing be generated during a one-year rain-
ties. That is, the sewer study is not conditions, develop alternative so. fall event were determined. Inflow
used as a basis for system manage- lutions with cost estimates, and pro- was estimated by developing a rela-
ment. vide an implementation plan based on tionship between inflow and rainfall
Johnson County Unified Waste- the selected solution. The scope of intensity with a technique reported by
water Districts(JCUWD), despite po- work was developed for selected Hollenbeck and Nogaj.,
tential difficulties, is proceeding with areas to provide a sound basis for de- Average daily base flow was de-
sewer improvements in a major veloping cost estimates for the re- termined to be 3.6 mgd or about 207
watershed known as Mission Town- quired improvements(without having gallons per building per day. The
ship Main Sewer District No. 1 to initially perform a comprehensive diurnal variation in base flow rates
(MTMSD). The watershed includes investigation throughout MTMSD resulted in an average measured base
about 1.3 million linear ft of sewer No. 1.) flow peaking factor of 1.52,where the
line, 17,500 residences, and nine mu- Flow Data.Existing sanitary sewer base flow peaking factor is defined as
nicipalities. maps were used for defining sewer the ratio of the peak hourly flow to
Residents-in the MTMSD service tributary areas or basins. MTMSD total daily flow. Peak infiltration was
area have experienced sanitary No. 1 was divided into 42 sanitary determined to be slightly over 9.8 mgd
sewer backups in their basements sewer basins. After determining or about 2.7 times average base flow.
and there has been raw wastewater basin boundaries, locations for instal- The unit infiltration rate, based on
64 PUBLIC WORKS for October, 1986
pipe diameter and lengthh infosani-
torY sewers stem was 5,700 gallons
per day per inch-diameter mile (gpd/ Table 2— Typical Rehabilitation and Construction Costs
idm). Peak one-year inflow was de- Rehabilitation Estimated
termined to be 96.8 mgd or nearly 27 1/1 Source Method Cost
times the average base flow rate.The Ponding Manhole Replace Manhole Cover $100
one-year unit inflow rate was 48,800 Pick Hole Inflow Replace Manhole Cover 100
0
gpd/idm. Corbel Leak Grout Corbel . 200
I/I Source Data. To obtain an esti- Cracked Manhole Wall Chisel Cracks and Grout 375
mate of the total infiltration and inflow Cracked Pipe Seal Chisel Cracks and Grout 200
(M)sources within the MTMSD,six of Cracked Bench/Trough Grout Joint 200
the 42 basins were selected for inten- Cracked Frame Seal Adjust Frame and Seal 360
sive investigation. The six selected Storm Connection Repair as necessary' 7,000-8,000
basins had high inflow rates,included Direct Storm Sump Repipe to Grade 800
several different communities, and Direct Storm Sump Remove Diverter Valve 300
were geographically distributed With Diverter
throughout the district. Downspouts Redirect Downspouts 100
The intensive survey of the six ba- Foundation Drain Connect New Storm Sump 5,2003
sins included the following activities: Unsealed Pum
♦ Manhole and visual pipe inspec- p Seal Pump with Sewer
200
tions. Suspect Building Replace Building Sewer 4,0003
Sewer
♦ Internal and external building
Cleanout Repair as necessary 250
inspections. Collapsed Pipe Replace Pipe(Each
♦ Smoke testing. 5 It Section)' 4,300-6,000
♦ Dye water testing of public and Building Sewer Replace Pipe 1,200
private sector IR sources. Combination Sump Seal Old Pump/Install
♦ Television inspection of selected New Sump 1,800
sewer lines.A comparison between UI source Driveway Drain Disconnect Drain/Install data and monitored flow data was de- pump 2,200terTransition Joint Repair as necessary 800
ing all
offd.For the purposes of analyze the MTMSD, the relative Manhole Frame Replace Manhole Frame 175
ng all
proportion of each type of I/I source 'Unit cost will vary with pipe diameter, number of repairs per line segment, and
identified in the intense study was required surface restoration.
applied throughout the entire district. 2Actual recommended repairs will depend on the use of the existing pump as a storm
From the study 22.5 percent of the sump pump, a sanitary sump pump,or both.
infiltration was identified, including 3Generally not cost-effective to repair.
13.9 percent from defective manhole
walls, 1.4 percent from defective pipe
seals, 0.3 percent from defective
bench/troughs, and 6.9 percent from _
defective joints and broken pipe. It
was further determined that the pub-
lic sector produced 27.1 percent of the
Table 1 — Distribution of E '.
Inflow Sources _
Percent
Source Inflow
Public Sector Inflow
Manhole Cover/Frames 5.6
Manhole Frame Seals 14.4
Manhole Corbels 7.1
Storm Connections 0.1
Private Sector Inflow
Storm Sumps 1.3
Storm with Diverter Valves 0.1
Combination Sumps 1.5
Unsealed Sumps 0.2
Suspect Storm Sumps _ 0.9
Downspouts 1.1
Suspect Downspouts 2.1
Foundation Drains 2.1
Suspect Foundation Drains 41.6 ■ VISUAL in of manhole revealed this infiltration source at a pipe seal.
ea 0.2
AreaDrains
Area Drains 2.6
Suspect Area Drains 5.1
Transition Joints 0.1
Leaking Service Lateral 0.1
Suspect Leaking Service Lateral 14.0
PUBLIC WORKS for October, 1986 65
• tion cost was converted to capital cost
5-YEAR STORM INFLOW (MGD) by using a service and contingency
factor of 27 percent for legal and fiscal
0 26 52 78 104 130 156 costs, administration, engineering,
70.0 and other expenses. Cost estimates
LEGEND were based on an ENR index of 4168
\ ACTUAL DATA as of August, 1984.
\
-----PROJECTED COST BASED The four major alternatives derived
60.0 \�\\ ON PHASE I INTENSIVE from this study were:
\ \ SURVEY DATA ♦
ALTERNATIVE D Alternative "A": No rehabilita-
tion of I/I sources;construction of new
�\�\ sewers; and construction of required
` treatment facilities.
50.0 \\\ TOTAL COSTS ♦ Alternative "B": Removal of I/I
\
\\\\ sources considered to be cost-
effective; construction of required
=a `\\\ new sewers and treatment facilities
F-J 400 \ ALTERNATIVE A
Cr p� \� for the six intensively studied basins.
3 S \\� ALTERNATIVE B ♦ Alternative "C": Complete field
Z \ (LIMIT OF REHAe studies for all of MTMSD No. 1 to lo-
wo\ \\ W/ EXISTING DATA) \ cate and quantify I/I sources;removal
W :-i30.0 \\\ of I/I sources considered to be cost-
W effective; and construction of new
a. \\` ALTERNATIVE C sewers as required.
F REHABILITATION \`\ ��' ♦ Alternative "D": Complete field
0 200 a SURVEY COSTS \�\ studies for all of the MTMSD No. 1 to
locate and quantify I/I sources; re-
COST-EFFECTIVE i� moval of I/I sources generally consid-
�\ POINT �i ered cost-effective; and removal of all
\ �' directly connected foundation drains.
10.0 NEW SEWER \� �� TREATMENT The results of the analysis, as
COSTS i� COSTS
__, shown in Figure 1, indicate that alter-
__ native"C"would be the least-cost ap-
proach.
Design Storm.In separate sanitary
100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 sewer systems, there is a relationship
between inflow and rainfall intensity
PERCENT .REDUCTION OF FLOW where Inflow increases exponentially
BY REHABILITATION with storm intensity.I Existing system
analysis and new sewer requirements
depend on a level of design storm pro-
0 FIGURE 1. Analysis shows Alternative "C" to be most cost-effective. tection; this storm event frequency
must be selected for the analysis and
inflow with the remaining 72.9 subsequent final design.
ech-
cent having its source in he private costs used nbthis astudy are shown methods rin niquee asru ed to develop thginal cost analysise unit
sector. The distribution of these n- Table 2. cost for the work necessary to prevent
flow sources is listed in Table 1. Treatment and transport costs a surcharge occurrence for flows that
Analysis were based on historical capital, op- exceed the system design capacity at
eration, and maintenance costs for a given storm frequency as reported
Optimization. Cost-effectiveness complete treatment and for wet by Braam and Nogaj.2 Using this
analysis was utilized to estimate the weather flow, sidestream treatment. approach a design storm can be
optimum level of I/I removal for the New sewer costs were based on selected. New sewer line, treatment,
purpose of achieving sanitary sewer preliminary relief sewer require- and I/I rehabilitation costs were esti-
system integrity. System integrity is ments obtained by using the RJN En- mated with analyses performed at 1-,
defined as an operational condition vironmental Sewer System Evalua- 2-,5-, 10-, and 25-year storm frequen-
where sewer backups, overflows, or tion Model (SSEM). This model cies. Incremental costs were de-
bypasses would not occur up to a routes the projected flow by line seg- veloped at each of these storm fre-
specified storm event. The optimum ment and compares the line capacity quency intervals followed by a de-
level of I/I removal would correspond to the expected peak flow. Where termination of the unit cost to prevent
to the projected least cost alternative. total flow exceeds line capacity the surcharge occurrence. These data
Elimination, treatment and trans- model specifies a new sewer line that are shown graphically in Figure 2.--'
port, and new sewer line require- is sized to carry the excess flow.Slope The results of the marginal costs
ments were analyzed at several levels and depth of the new line is assumed analysis indicate that a point of di-
of infiltration and inflow removal. to be the same as the existing line. minishing return would be experi-
Elimination costs were based on the ' Estimated construction cost for the enced somewhere between the
estimated construction costs to re- new sewers is based on depth of ex- 5-year and 10-year storm protection
move I/I sources. This would include cavation and pipe diameter. level and that the design frequency
removal of sources such as storm Total present worth for several al- should be between these two points.
SUMP pumps, downspouts, and area ternatives was compared based on a The 5-year storm protection level
drains as well as repairing manhole planning period of 20 years at an would result in, on the average, a
frame seals, pipe seals, and sewer interest rate of 85/s percent. Construc- backup occurrence twice every 10
66
PUBLIC WORKS for October, 1986
•
years(a 20 percent probabilMin any be handled by the existing treatment provements early in the program.
given year) while the 10-year storm facilities. Perimeter basins will be completed
level would result in a backup once Phasing Schedule.The initial idea first so that these basins will not be
every 10 years(a 10 percent probabil- toward phasing of the sewer system subject to upstream tributary areas
ity in any given year). survey, design, and rehabilitation ac- that could overload areas of rehabi)�
For cost-effective private sector tivities was based on the magnitude of tation and new sewers.
and public sector improvements fi- the unit inflow rate determined for Completion of the work by water-
nanced over 20 years, a typical each basin. However, performing shed allows for early evaluation of the
homeowner cost based on an average work in this manner would result program. It is estimated that each
assessed property evaluation would in having the work "scattered" phase will take about two years to
be $55.80 per year for 5-year protec- throughout the district during any complete. Survey and design will
tion and $68.30 per year for 10-year given phase. This could result in both proceed concurrently in one phase
protection. Based on the computer higher administrative and construc- while construction and rehabilitation
modeling and survey work the esti- tion costs. Further, basins with high is being conducted for those basins
mated public and private sector capi- unit inflow rates would not necessar- included in a previous phase. The
tal cost for 5-year protection was$15.3 ily correlate with the areas where type of sewer rehabilitation is antici-
million(or a unit cost of$0.098 million there were known sewer backups. pated to be the same in all phases in-
to prevent a surcharge occurrence); Sewer capacity relative to actual cluding public and private sector
for the 10-year protection the esti- flows must therefore be considered work. The types of public sector re-
mated cost was$18.7 million(or$0.46 when evaluating the potential for habilitation will include manhole re-
million to prevent a surcharge occur- backup reduction. pair, sewer line repairs and grouting,
rence). The phasing is based on a combina- relief sewers, cross-connection re-
The breakdown of work for the 10- tion of watershed location,unit inflow movals,and in-place lining of sewers.
year protection program included rate, and the history of sewer Conclusions
nearly$1.3 million for the remaining backups.This recommended phasing
survey work in the district, $2.5 mil- approach will generally concentrate The"project approach"used in the
lion for infiltration elimination, $3.1 the survey and construction activities Mission District study can be applied
million for inflow removal in the pub- in the same geographical areas thus to provide information for determin-
lic sector, nearly$3 million for inflow lowering construction and adminis- ing the total cost of proceeding with
removal in the private sector, and trative costs. Work will generally be survey, design, and construction ac-
over$8.8 million for new sewer lines. phased according to the watershed tivities. This enables planners to
Treatment of the remaining IR could thereby producing measurable im- evaluate the work based on economic
feasibility. In addition, the level of
■ FIGURE 2. The relationship of cost for protection and design.storm. protection against peak flow during
wet weather conditions can b
selected from the partial survey data
1400 25-YEAR STORM The grouping of the work by geo-
graphical areas allows an early evalu-
1300 ation of the program and helps control
construction costs and area construc-
1200 tion activity. The Mission District
study indicates that system flow
1100 monitoring and selective survey in-
vestigation can achieve the following:
i1000 ♦ Provide cost-effective evaluation
of sewer rehabilitation alternatives.
e0 ♦ Project the total system rehabili-
0
tation cost.
O ♦ Develop a rationale for the selec-
0 cr 800 tion of a storm design level of protec-
d a tion.
_ 0 700.-
00
00 ♦ Determine a phasing schedule
for implementation of a selected so-
13 600 lution. 0130
Q Q 10-YEAR STORM
W o 500 Acknowledgment. Data used in this
W v study were obtained during the sewer sur-
a 400 vey conducted by RJN Environmental and
funded by the Johnson County Unified
0
0 300 Wastewater Districts.This article is based
N on a paper presented at the Water Pollu-
U 200 tion Control Federation Conference held -"
5-YEAR STORM in Kansas City, Missouri, October 1985.
100 2-YEAR STORM References
1."One Technique for Estimating Inflow
0 with Surcharge Conditions."Richard J�
0 10 20 30 40 Nogaj and Alan J. Hollenbeck,Journa
TOTAL PRESENT WORTH WPCF, April 1981.
(MILLION DOLLARS) 2."Selection of Optimum Storm Fre-
quency for Sewer Studies." Richard J.
Nogaj and George A. Braam, Journal
WPCF, October 1982.
PUBLIC WORKS for October, 1986 67
'.A
C-
MEMORANDUM
TO: Board of Directors
THROUGH: Mike Shelton , City Manager .,
FROM: Paul M. Sensibaugh , Director of Public Works
SUBJECT : Sewer Annexation - Evangelical Free Church
DATE: September 29, 1987
Recommendation :
Staff recommends that the Board approve the attached
Resolution annexing a Portion of Lot 16 Block 13 into the
boundaries of Improvement District No . 2 .
Background:
In January of this year Council approved a Conditional
• Use Permit for the Evangelical Free Church of Atascadero to
construct a new church on Santa Rosa Avenue . They are in the
process of applying for a building permit and will be under
construction immediately after issuance .
The annexation is conditioned upon paying a sewer
extension reimbursement charge to the Church of Christ as
specified in the annexation resolution . The Church of
Christ , in 1975 , extended the sewer lines that the
Evancreiical Free Church will be connecting to . They filed a
reimbursement agreement at that time and therefore are
eligible for reimbursement in the amount of $529 .79.
Fiscal impact :
There is no cost to the District related to this
annexation . The Applicant will be required to pay all
annexation fees and connection fees in effect at the time of
application and/or connection .
•
RESOLUTION NO. _ 109-87
A RESOLUTION OF THE ATASCADERO COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICT APPROVING EXTENDING PUBLIC SEWER SERVICE TO
A PORTION OF LOT 16 BLOCK 13 AND INCORPORTING .THE AREA
CONCERNED INTO THE BOUNDARIES OF IMPROVEMENT
DISTRICT NO. 2
(9225 MORRO ROAD)
WHEREAS , the Atascadero County Sanitation District is
empowered by Section 4834 of the Health and Safety Code to
annex territory already a part of the County Sanitation
District to the Improvement District of that County Sanitation
District ; and
WHEREAS, The Evangelical Free Church of Atascadero owns
the property described in Exhibits A and B attached to this
resolution; and
WHEREAS, said, property , located at near Morro Road on
Santa Rosa Avenue, is contiguous with Improvement District #2 ;
and •
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission has interpreted the
General Plan as authorizing connection of this property to
existing sewer lines ; and
WHEREAS, the proposed annexation has received a Negative
Declaration pursuant to the provisions of the Environmental
Quality Act ;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Directors of the
Atascadero County Sanitation District as follows :
Section 1 . The Board finds that the territory described
in this resolution will be benefitted by such sewer service
(Health and Safety Code Section 4830)
Section 2 . The Board approves the connection of public
sewer service to the following parcel , subject to the payment
of appropriate fees as listed _ in the Atascadero County
Sanitation District Coder
A PortionofLot 16 Block 13 APN 54-151-3
Section 3 . The area included in APN 54-151-30 , Portion
of Lot 16 Block 13 is hereby incorporated into the
boundaries of Improvement District NO. 2 .
Section 4 . The above action is conditional upon said lot
paying a reimbursement agreement filed by the owners of Lot
Lot 17 Block 13 on 6-28-76 in the amount of $529 .79 .
On motion by Board Member and seconded by
Board Member ,the foregoing resolution is adopted
in its entirety by the following roll call vote ,
AYES :
NOES :
ABSENT :
DATE:
ATTEST : ATASCADERO COUNTY
1 SANITATION DISTRICT
MICHAEL B. SHELTON BARBARA NORRIS
Secretary President
APPROVED AS TO FORM APPROVED AS TO CONTENT
JEFFREY G. JORGENSEN — PAUL M.
-------------
SENSIBAUGH
City Attorney Dir , of Public Works
- • EXHIBIT "A" TO ITEM E-3
0.%4�sl
�z
SLO-847004 KS
The land referred to In this Report is situated in the State
of Callfornla , County of San Luis Obispo, and is described as
follows:
That portion of Lot 16 in Block 13 of Atascadero Colony , in
the City of Atascadero, County of San Luis Obispo , State of
California , as shown on the map of Atascadero Colony, recorded
In Book 3, Page 11 of Maps, in the office of the County Recorder
of said County, described as follows:
Beginning at a point on the center Ilne of Santa Rosa Road ,
as shown on said map , that is distant along said center Iine,
South 450051 East, 489 . 08 feet from the center line of Morro
Road as shown on said map ; thence South 45054111 " West, 262.92
feet to the Southwesterly line of said Lot 16 ; thence along
said Southwesterly Ilne, North 500261 West, 208.09 feet to the
most Southerly corner of the land described In the deed to Pacific
Gas and Electric Company , recorded September 22 , 1954 in Book
772, Page 533 of Official Records , in the office of the County
Recorder of said County ; thence along the Southeasterly line
. of the land described in said deed , North 39 °341 East, 201 . 9
feet to the center line of said Santa Rosa Road , South 43°051
East, 239.08 feet to the point of beginning .
EXCEPT therefrom that portion of said land lying within the
lines of Santa Rosa Road as shown on said map as reserved by
Colony Holding Corporation , by deed recorded July 18, 1921 in
Book 147, Page 28 of Deeds .
ALSO EXCEPT therefrom that portion of said land described in
the deed to Pacific Gas and Electric Company , recorded April
14, 1964 in Book 1293 , Page 14 of Official Records, in the office
of the County Recorder of said County .
PAGE 2
THE EVANGETJCAL
*FREE CHURCH
of ATASCADERO david r.lee,pastor
To the Public :forks Director
City of Atascadero
r;;ay 1 1987
Dear Sir:
I am writing this letter of request on behalf of the
_Evangelical Free Church of Atascadero that we might be included
by annexation to the sanitation district. Our Church facility
will be located approximately near Porro Road on Santa Rosa. Our
Z
AP",' 54-151-030 should help you identify what is contained in our
conditional use permit as approved by the City Council in January,
1987. ".^1e are presently on the brink of getting our building permit
• and would very much appreciate your approval to this request as
soon as possible .
Thank you very much for yout cooperation.
Cordially,
C
David R . Lee
P.S . Correspondence could be addressed to our Building Chairman:
i• r. Russ :'right Rev. David R. Zee
P .0 - Box 377 P .C . Box as
Atascadero, Ca. or Atascadero , Ca.
93423-0377 93423
POST OFFICE BOX 777 •• ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA 93423 •• (805) 461-1197
> .7.
t _ EXHIBIT B
.L c ` iw. .. _.
41*
i► :�C
Y
A
- . SCto
� k
r t 1ru .:CREEKRES NO 9 O Qw
�
J ,s NATE . —
W w� ROAD)`
•§w��O�O �
-
y dL. h R+ erg S•'T. i 32 171.94
k •—at4 .�E�, '`:.,0 `E._s..a-a' • �-r••- t4ai /0c.8l
i _ I a 6
jf - *
�.s �i a F_..'� -3'r
.R,�Y_=-�
_ ��-�. *�� f -%mss. a -� .:� .y. .h '_' �� ^"E�i.• - � -
to
�Ou
m O
_ �tA
4a ZT&
. ;6
�.0 C,.
IE
,�
Go fo vi •P0
n r
• 0 i 4t'f.2Z �yyc -a-
bb
- �� n
� - � M91"3!DGW-•_i'O R L1 _
�s' r- 7ttco uz rtt w FYI _
N
n
- . q
A �
PM.28-80 0
`OOE
Z D n
Z y
O
C) ? `
rq
ir
_ �.+f°•��'n^�':taD°"O�+.Y,+�.'iw-.:^R••,.��.aw.....+..a9. -v at��TN i'• i
•
MEMORANDUM
TO: Board of Directors
THROUGH: Mike Shelton , City Manager ,
FROM: Paul M. Sensibaugh, Director of Public Works
SUBJECT : Sewer Annexation - Spanish Ridge Yeomans
DATE: September 29, 1987
Recommendation :
Staff recommends that the Board approve the attached
Resolution annexing Lots 10 , 11 , 12 , 13, 14 , 15 , 24 ,
Portions of Lots 5 and 7 of Tract 5 ; and, Parcels 1 , 2 and 3
of Parcel Map AT-81-281 ,
Background:
• The property involved in this annexation is a
reconfiguration of existing lots to create a Planned Unit
Development of 8 Units with a large open space area which
will be known as ''Spanish Ridge'' . The remaining property
derived from this reconfiguration will be sold as unimproved
residential lots .
The area to be developed is within the Urban Services
Area , but in order to maintain a gravity sewer system this
development was required to construct a new trunk line
through the Chalk Mt , Golf Course to connect to the Bordeaux
bypass line and to obtain an easement from the County for
the same .
Fiscal Impact :
There is no cost to the District related to this
annexation . The Developer is required to extend the sewer
line and to pay all annexation fees in effect at the time of
approval .
•
•
RESOLUTION NO. 110-87
A RESOLUTION OF THE ATASCADERO COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICT APPROVING EXTENDING PUBLIC SEWER SERVICE TO
LOTS 10, 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 24 , PORTIONS OF' "
LOTS 5 AND 7 OF TRACT 5 ; AND, PARCELS 1 , 2 AND
3 OF PARCEL MAP AT 81-281
(EL BORD6 AVENUE)
WHEREAS, the Atascadero County SanitationDistrict is
empowered by Section 4834 of the Health and Safety Code to
annex territory already a part of the County Sanitation
District to the Improvement District of that County Sanitation
District ; and
ti
WHEREAS, Mr . Mike Yeomans owns the property described
in Exhibits A and B attached to this resolution; and
WHEREAS , said, property , located on El Bordo Avenue, is
contiguous with Improvement District #1 ; and
WHEREAS , said property is within the boundaries of the •
Atascadero County Sanitation District ; and
WHEREAS, the proposed annexation has received a Negative
Declaration pursuant to the provisions of the Environmental
Quality Act ;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Directors of the
Atascadero County Sanitation District as follows :
Section 1 . The Board finds that the territory described
in this resolution will be benefitted by such sewer service
(Health and Safety Code Section 4830)
Section 2 . The Board approves the connection of public
sewer service to the following parcels , subject to the payment
of appropriate fees as listed in the Atascadero County
Sanitation District Code :
Lots 10, 11 , 12 , 13 , 141. 15, Lot 24 , -arid portions of
Lots 6 and 7 of Tract 5 ; and Parcels 1 through 3 of
Parcel Map AT 81-281
Subject to the following condition :
Obtain all necessary plumbing and street encroachment
permits and execute a sewer main extension agreement . •
Section 3 . The area described above is hereby
incorporated into the boundaries of Improvement District NO.
1 .
On motion by Board Member and seconded by
Board Member ,the foregoing resolution is adopted
in its entirety by the following roll call rote .
AYES:
NOES :
ABSENT :
DATE:
ATTEST : ATASCADERO COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT
MICHAEL B. SHELTON BARBARA NORRIS
Secretary President
APPROVED AS TO FORM APPROVED AS TO CONTENT
•
JEFFREY G. JORGENSEN PAUL M. SENSIBAUGH
City Attorney Dir , of Public Works
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS •
Assessor's Parcel Numbers: 30-451-04 = Lots 11 thru 15 Tract 5
30-441-01 = Lots 6,7, 10 Tract 5
30-442-06 = Lots 1,2, 3 of Map AT-281
30-442-03 = Lot 24 Tract 5
Legal Descriptions:
Lots 6,7,10,11,12, 13, 14, 15,24 of Tract 5, in the County of San Luis Obispo,
State of California, According to the map recorded in Book 5, Page 24 of Maps,
in the office of the County Recorder of said County.
Parcels 1, 2, and 3 of Parcel Map AT-81-281 in the City of Atascadero, County
of San Luis Obispo, State of California, according to the map recorded October
25, 1982 in Book 32 at Page 86 of Parcel Mpas in the Office of the County Recorder
of said County.
EXHIBIT B
l'9N.Ws �
✓L' C �
Q�
w aown
O Q
y o
at
Ab
w ^j
N �
i
d
G
--moo ; � � w ✓J
21
.� z P