Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda Packet 10/27/1987
OFFICE COPY'/ PUBLIC REVIEW COPY NOTE: THERE WILL BE A CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION AT 6 :30 P.M. • IN THE ADMINISTRATION BUILDING FOURTH FLOOR CLUB ROOM REGARDING PROPERTY NEGOTIATIONS (ATASCADERO LAKE PROPERTIES GUI DRY) A G E N D A ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING ATASCADERO ADMINISTRATION BUILDING FOURTH FLOOR, ROTUNDA ROOM OCTOBER-27, -1987 7:30 P. M. RULES OF PUBLIC PARTICIPATION * Members of the audience may speak on any item on the agenda. * A person may speak for five (5) minutes. * No one may speak for a second time until everyone wishing to ispeak has had an opportunity to do so. * No one may speak more than twice on any item. * Council members may question any speaker ; the speaker may respond; but after the alloted time has expired, may not initiate further discussion. * The floor will then be closed to public participation and open for Council discussion. Call to Order Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Invocation: Pastor Larry Etter - Community Church of Atascadero ** Recognition Proclamation to Bill Heath - Traffic Committee City Council Comment Committee Reports - (The following represent Ad Hoc or Standing Committees. Informative status reports will be given, as felt necessary. 1. City/School Committee 6. Equal Opportunity Commission 2. North Coastal Transit 17. Police Facility Committee 3. San Luis Obispo Area 8. Atascadero Lake Acquistion Coordinating Council Committee 4. Traffic Committee 9. Tree Committee 5. Solid Waste Mgmt Committee 10 . Bicentennial Committee (Approximate Time - 30 Minutes) COMMUNITY FORUM The City Council values and encourages exchange of ideas and comments from you the citizen. The public comment period is provided to receive comments from the public on matters other than scheduled agenda items. To increase the effectiveness of Community Forum, the following rules will be enforced: * A maximum of 30 minutes will be allowed for Community Forum, unless Council authorizes an extension. * All remarks shall be addressed to Council as a whole and not to any individual member thereof. * No questions shall be asked of a Council Member or City staff without permission of the Mayor. * No person shall be allowed to make slanderous, profane, impertinent, or personal remarks against any Council Member or member of the City staff. * Any person desiring to submit written statements may do so by forwarding to Council, prior to the Council Meeting, nine (9) copies to the City Clerk by 5:00 p.m. on the Wednesday preceeding the Council Meeting. A. CONSENT CALENDAR iAll matters listed under Item A, Consent Calendar , are considered to be routine, and will be enacted by one motion in the form listed be- low. There will be no separate discussion of these items. A member of the Council or public may, by request, have any item removed from the Consent Agenda, which shall be reviewed and acted upon separately after the adoption of the Consent Calendar . 1. Approval of City Council Minutes - October 13, 1987 2. Acceptance of Finance Department Report - September, 1987 3. Acceptance of City Treasurer ' s Report - September, 1987 4. Approval of Tentative Parcel Map 22-85 Time Extension Request 6905 El Camino Real - El Camino Associates (Century Plaza) / Cuesta Engineering 5. Approval of Tentative Parcel Map 23-85 Time Extension Request 5495 Traffic Way - Carroll 6. Approval of Tentative Parcel Map 27-87 - 7565 Sombrilla Ave (Lot 3 of Block E) - Subdivision of Two Parcels at 1.46 Acres into 3 Lots, ranging from. 20 ,000 - 23,100 Square Feet Each - Brink/Cuesta Engineering 2 7. Acceptance of Final Parcel Map 18-87 - 8255 Graves Creek Road - Pollard/Cuesta Engineering 8. Resolution 112-87 - Rotunda Room Rental Policy Amendment 9. Authorization for Tree Lighting Ceremonies by Hospice - Sunken Gardens 10. Acceptance of Final Parcel Map 33-86 - 3980 E1 Camino Real - K-Mart B. HEARINGS/APPEARANCES/REPORTS (Approximate Time - 30 Minutes) 1. Appeal of Planning Commission Denial of Conditional Use Permit for a Private Elementary School on 2.07 Acres —9148 Palomar (Approximate Time - 30 Minutes) 2. Undergrounding of PG&E Utilities - Public Hearing 'on Boundaries Proposed • C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS (Approximate Time 5 Minutes) 1. Zone Change 11-87 - 8485 El Corte - City of Atascadero Initiated A. Ordinance 158 - Reverting the Existing Zoning Designation of Residential Multiple Family with Planned Development RMF (PD6) to Prior Zoning Designation of Residential Single Family, RSF-2, 1.5-2. 5 Acre Minimum Lot Size (Cont'd from 10/13/87 Council Meeting) (SECOND AND FINAL READING) (Approximate Time - 5 Minutes) 2. Zone Change 12-87 - 8750 E1 Camino Real - Genzone A. Ordinance 161 - Revising Industrial Park Zoning Designation to Commercial Service (Cont'd from 10/13/87) (SECOND AND FINAL READING) (Approximate Time - 15 Minutes) 3. Zone Change 9-87 / Tentative Tract Map 10-87 - 6875 Tecorida Woodglen Ltd/Cuesta Engineering A. Ordinance 160 - Amending Existing Zoning of Residential Multiple Family, 16 Units/Acre with a Flood Hazard Overlay to Residential Multiple Family, 16 Units/Acre with a Flood • Hazard and Planned Development Overlay (Cont'd from 10/13/87 Council Meeting) (SECOND AND FINAL READING) 3 • i B. Tentative Tract Map 10-87 - Subdivision of 1. 2 Acres with 3 Lots into 9 Lots of Varying Sizes from 3,968 to 7,074 Square Feet and Establishment of "Los Arboles" as a Private Street Name (Cont'd from 10/13/87 Council Meeting) (Approximate Time - 15 Minutes) 4. Proposed Surplus of City-Owned Lot on Sycamore Road (Lot 4, Block H) (Cont'd from 7/14/87) D. NEW BUSINESS (Approximate Time - 15 Minutes) 1. Authorizationto Enter into Agreement with Vandenberghe Construction Company to Allow Temporary Access Across City Property at Paloma Creek Park (Approximate Time - 30 Minutes) 2. Weekend/Evening Dial-A-Ride Transit Service - Status Report E. ATASCADERO SANITATION DISTRICT (Council will recess and convene as the Atascadero County Sanitation District Board of Directors) (Approximate Time - 10 Minutes) 1. Award of T.V. Monitoring Portion of (I & I) Bid (The Board of Directors will adjourn and reconvene as the City Council) F. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION 1. City Council A. Apointment(of Ad Hoc Committee to Review Status of Pavilion Building Renovation 2. City Attorney 3. City Clerk 4. City Treasurer 5. City Manager • 4 • 6ET NG ' AG`IVDA Tc lv Z ITEM # ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 13, 1987 Atascadero Administration Building The regular meeting of the Atascadero City council was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Mayor Norris. ROLL CALL Present: Councilmembers Borgeson, Handshy, Mackey, Bourbeau and Mayor Norris A Plaque of Appreciation was presented to the Atascadero Board of Realtors for their generous donation to the Charles Paddock Zoo. New employee Greg Peyton, Fire Fighter, was introduced to Council. • CITY COMMITTEE REPORTS The Tree Committee will meet October 14th to review the draft tree ordinance. The Police Facility Committee is presently negotiating the pur- chase of Beno's facility with owners, and are expecting to pre- sent a report to Council within two weeks. COUNCIL COMMENT Councilmember Borgeson requests Paul Sensibaugh to present the issue of varying speed limits on the north end of E1 Camino Real to the Traffic Committee for their consideration. PUBLIC COMMENT Joe Nyle reiterates his past concerns regarding the City provid- ing legal defense to Councilmembers involved in a recent lawsuit. City Attorney Jorgensen responds that a formal statement has been issued on this litigation, and nothing has transpired since to require further comment. • 1 A. CONSENT CALENDAR S 1. Approval of City Council Minutes - September 22, 1987 2. Denial of Claim by Rosalie Hyde for Augustine Hyde - $850, 000 Personal Damages 3. Denial of Claim by Thomas Bench in the Amount of $250,000 4. Proclamation - Acknowledging October 25-31 as "Red Ribbon Week" (Drug Awareness Week) 5. Resolution 108-87 - Designation of a Stop Intersection on Tranquila, Rosita, and Lobos at Intersection with San Anselmo 6. Resolution 107-87 - Designation of 2-Hour Parking on the Northwest side of Pueblo, from E1 Camino to Sinaloa Avenue 7. Resolution 111-87 - Designation of a "No Parking" Sign on the Northerly side of San Andreas, near Santa Lucia (Behind Atascadero High School) 8. Approval of Tentative Lot Line Adjustment 14-87 - 800 Belle Vista - Atkinson/Twin Cities Engineering • 9. Approval of Proposed San Luis Obispo County Visitors and Conference Bureau Agreement - 9/1/87 - 9/1/88 - $2,300 10. Acceptance of Final Tract Map 4-87 - 9240 Atascadero Avenue - Hawkins/Cuesta Engineering 11. Authorization to Solicit Bids — Graves Creek Bridge Reconstruction 12. Resolution 99-87 Establishment of a Policy Statement for Disadvantaged Business Enterprises and Establishment of a Liason Officer In Accordance with Federal Regulations (Cont'd from 9/22/87) 13. Acceptance. of Final Parcel Map 37-86 - 7421 Santa Ysabel - Young Discussion regarding A-7 transpired with Jerry Craig on exact locations of no parking areas around the high school. Attorney Jorgensen is a member of the San Luis Obispo Chamber of Commerce and will not be advising Council on Item A-9, due to a Possible conflict of interest. Henry Engen, Community Development Director , notes that Allegre Avenue is the street name chosed for tract on Atascadero Avenue under Item A-10 . • MOTION: Councilmember Bourbeau moves approval of the Consent Calendar, as presented; Councilmember Borgeson seconds; Motion carries unanimously 2 B-1 ZONE CHANGE 11-87 - 8485 EL CORTE - CITY OF ATASCADERO INITIATED (CONT'D FROM 9/22/87) - PUBLIC HEARING B. ORDINANCE 158 - REVERTING THE EXISTING ZONE DESIGNATION OF RESIDENTIAL MULTIPLE FAMILY WITH PLANNED DEVELOPMENT #6 TO PRIOR ZONING DESIGNATION OF RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY, 1. 5 TO 2.5 ACRE MINIMUM LOT SIZE (FIRST READING) Community Development Director Henry Engen reviews this item' s history, which caused it' s original zoning to be changed, and why staff is now recommending the zoning be reverted back to it' s original designation. The applicant has informed staff that he will be unable to attend tonight's meeting, but will re-review possible development alter- natives of this parcel with staff at a later date. There is no public comment on this item. MOTION: Councilmember Bourbeau moves to read Ordinance 158 by title only; Councilmember Mackey seconds; Motion carries unanimously MOTION: Councilmember Mackey moves to adopt Ordinance 158 as a first reading; Councilmember Bourbeau seconds; motion carries unanimously B-2 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2C-87 AND ZONE CHANGE 6-87 9300 EL BORDO - MC CASLIN/HAWKINS - PUBLIC HEARING RESOLUTION 105-87 - APPROVING AMENDMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN FROM LOW DENSITY SINGLE FAMILY TO HIGH DENSITY MULTIPLE FAMILY ORDINANCE 59 - AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING FROM RSF-Z TO RMF-16 (PD-7) (FIRST READING) Community Development Director Henry Engen states that this pro- posal relates to two one-acre non-conforming lots, adjacent to a mobilehome park. After project revision from 12 to 8 units on each lot, the Planning Commission approved the 16 lot re-design. Applicant Mark Ashland states that the area is developed with. high density projects with a few single family residences. He feels that this project would offer low-cost housing on inex- pensive lots. 3 David Cathrina, adjacent property owner , objects to additional densities proposed with units on 3, 000 square foot lots. Councilmembers discuss concerns regarding densities proposed. Councilmember Handshy supports Planning Commission recommendation for approval, as he feels there is not overwhelming reasons for denial. MOTION: Councilmember Bourbeau moves for denial of Resolution 105-87 and Ordinance 159; Councilmember Borgeson seconds; Motion carries 4-1 (Councilmember Handshy opposed) B-3 PROPOSED ZONE CHANGE 12-87 - 8750 EL CAMINO REAL - GENZONE PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE 161 - REVISING INDUSTRIAL PARK ZONING DESIGNATION TO COMMERCIAL SERVICE (FIRST READING) Community Development Director Henry Engen states that this project, adjacent to the Lucky' s Shopping Center, is presently an apartment complex. Present zoning splits the parcel in Commercial Service and Industrial Park . The applicants are pro- posing a 75 room hotel with restaurant fronting E1 Camino, and request the whole parcel be zoned Commercial Service. Plannig Commission voted unanimously to approve the proposal. Sandra Jenzone, Applicant, feels their proposal will revitalize this area and provide a nice project for the community. No public comment given on this item. Discussion continues regarding spot zoning in this area between commercial and industrial uses. It is determined that since the property is divided between two zoning designations, it is only appropriate to amend the zoning to one designation. MOTION: Councilmember Bourbeau moves to read Ordinance 161 by title only; Councilmember Borgeson seconds; motion carries unanimously MOTION: Councilmember Mackey moves to Approve Ordinance 161 as first reading; Councilmember Bourbeau seconds; Motion carries unanimously B-4 ZONE CHANGE AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 10-87 - 6875 TECORIDA WOODGLEN LTD/CUESTA ENGINEERING - PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE 160 - AMENDING EXISTING ZONING OF RMF/16 (FH) TO • RMF 16 (FH (PD7) ALLOWING CREATION OF A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY FOR SMALL LOT SUBDIVISION CONSISTING OF SUBDIVISON 4 • OF 1.2 ACRES INTO 9 LOTS OF VARYING SIZES FROM 3 ,968 TO 7,074 SQUARE FEET AND ESTABLISHMENT OF "LOS ARBOLES" AS A PRIVATE STREET NAME (FIRST READING Community Development Director Henry Engen clarifies to Council that the site is 1. 2 acres and not 2.1 acres. The proposal is a planned development of 9 lots with a private road. The applicant originally requested a higher density, but has since been redesigned with special reports completed addressing soils, archaeology, and traffic. It is noted that the density presently proposed is less than the existing zoning with planned develop- ment would allow. Council is instructed to address the zone change proposal prior to addressing the tract map proposal. Mike Busey reviews the project, and feels that it will provide affordable housing in Atascadero and that the overlay proposal will benefit the community. Due to this site being in the Tecorida Flood Plain boundaries, the applicant is proposing to increase the site elevation with fill material to 3 feet above the documented flood zone. These units are proposed to be sold in the high $80 , 000 range, unless conditions impact proposed development costs. Sarah Gronstad, Atascadero resident, questions building any type of structures in documented flood zone areas. Sharon Morin, Atascadero resident, feels the project can be an asset to the community and would provide affordable housing. Council discusses concerns of development of the proposed site with it' s swamp-like conditions. MOTION: Councilmember Handshy moves to read Ordinance 160 by title only; Councilmember Bourbeau seconds; motion carries unanimously MOTION: Councilmember Handshy moves to approve Ordinance 160 as a first reading; Councilmember Mackey seconds; motion carreies 4-1 (Councilmember Borgeson opposed) MOTION: Councilmember Bourbeau moves to continue action of Tentative Parcel Map 10-87 till after approval of the second reading of Ordinance 160 ; Councilmember Borgeson seconds; motion carries unanimously B-5 FISCAL YEAR 1987/88 FIRST QUARTER BUDGET STATUS REPORT JULY - SEPTEMBER • Administrative Services Director David Jorgensen presents an overview of the budget thus far , showing a deficit of $473 , 205. A deficit showing at this time of the year is acceptable as major tax receipts will not be received by the City till December and 5 April. All department expenditures look acceptable. • Due to revenue sources not coming in as expected, some major projects may be put on hold till more is known on funds. No public comment was given to this item. MOTION: Councilmember Mackey moves to accept the First Quarter Budget Report for Fiscal Year 1987/88; Councilmember Bourbeau seconds; motion carries unanimously C-1 MAYOR SELECTION SURVEY - SURVEY STATUS City Clerk Boyd Sharitz provides the recent survey totals with 72 votes to retain current practice (Council appointment) and 253 to change current practice to a citizen elect process. Council agrees to accept the survey and not to act on this item, as it appears not to be a significant issue with the public due to poor voting response. Council will again review this issue at a future Council .Workshop. City Attorney Jeff Jorgensen suggests keeping the votes received on file for approximately 6 months. D-1 CONSIDERATION REGARDING APPOINTMENT OF CITIZEN MEMBER TO TRAFFIC COMMITTEE Public Works Director Paul Sensibaugh states that there is a vacanty on the Traffic Committee, as Bill Heath' s position is up for reappointment. It is noted that citizen appointments are for two year terms with no consecutive terms allowed. Council recog- nizes Bill Heath and the hard work he has given to the Committee and commends him for his efforts. There are presently 1 City Council member , 3 staff, and 2 citizen appointments on the Traffic Committee. Council determines that the City Clerk' s Office will advertise the vacancy through the newspaper , with applications presented to Council for consideration of appointment. Council appointment to the committee is a one-year term, but can be reappointed consecutively. Mayor Barbara Norris appoints Councilmember Mackey as the Council representative to the Committee, replacing the Mayor . An alter- nate Council representative will be appointed at a later date. . 6 • MOTION: Councilmember Mackey moves to authorize advertise- ment through local newspapers of the citizen vacancy existing on the Traffic Committee; Councilmember Borgeson seconds; motion carries unanimously MOTION: Councilmember Bourbeau moves to appoint Council- member Mackey as the Council representative on the Traffic Committee; Councilmember Borgeson seconds; motion carries unanimously D-2 AWARD OF 1987/88 ROAD RESURFACING PROGRAM BID TO MADONNA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY - $423 ,105 ,84 Public Works Director Paul Sensibaugh recommends Council award of this year ' s road resurfacing program to Madonna Construction. It is noted that of the $423,105.84 bid, there is $365,000 budgeted. Staff proposes utilization of carryover funds or interest earnings to provide additional funds needed and not reducing the proposed project boundaries. Regarding Llano Road reconstruction, due to adjacent developers Drake and Davis providing grading, road widening, fine grading, . and base work, the City will now be able to widen the road cul- vert and resurface the road to Santa Lucia. No public comment is given to this item. MOTION: Councilmember Borgeson moves to approve the 1987/88 Resurfacing Bid to Madonna Construction at $423 ,105.84, and to transfer funds reflect additonal funds needed; Concilmember Mackey seconds; Motion carries 4-0 (Councilmember Bourbeau exempts himself from voting on this item. ) D-3 RESOLUTION 106-87 - AMENDING RESOLUTIONS 21-85 AND 112-86 CITY MANAGER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT City Manager Michael Shelton gives an overview of proposed changes to his contract, which provides for a 4.9% salary/benefit increase for fiscal year 1987/88. George Highland, Carmelita resident, feels that the City Manager , due to past actions, should not be granted an extension of his employment contract. Joe Nyle, Atascadero resident, questions the City Manager ' s past actions related to ignoring Dial-A-Ride legislative mandates, and feels the City Manager should be replaced. 7 Councilmember Borgeson discusses the need for additonal public • comment and information regarding this issue. MOTION: Councilmember Borgeson moves to contnue this item to the November 10, 1987 Council Meeting; Mayor Norris seconds; Motion carries 3-2 (Councilmembers Mackey and Handshy opposed) D-4 RESOLUTION 103-87 - ADOPTING A SALARY/CLASSIFICATION SCHEDULE AND BENEFITS FOR MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES City Manager Shelton states that staff is presenting position equity adjustments for the Parks and Recreation Director , Administrative Services Director, Communty Development Director, and Chief of Police ranging from 4.45% to 5. 84%, effective January 1, 1988 and January 1, 1989. Salary and benefit increases, without equity adjustment, will be a total increase of 6.61% over, present budget for fiscal year 1987/88. It is noted that this is a quasi-two year agreement, with issues defined with the exception of unknown cost of living figures for fiscal year 1988/89. No public comment is given on this item. Councilmember Bourbeau feels the City' s Department Heads have done a superb job and are worthy of the proposed salary and bene- fit increases. MOTION: Councilmember Bourbeau moves to approve Resolution 103-87; Councilmember Borgeson seconds; Motion carries unanimously D-5 RESOLUTION 104-87 - ADOPTION OF A SALARY/CLASSIFICATION SCHEDULE AND BENEFITS FOR CONFIDENTIAL EMPLOYEES City Manager Shelton states that the City' s three Confidential employees are considered exempt from the "Meet and Confer" bargaining process. Staff reviews a recent study of cities with- in San Luis Obispo County who do acknowledge and compensate Confidential status employees over non-confidential employees. Staff suggests grouping two Confidential employees with the S.E. I.U. Clerical bargaining unit, to receive salary/benefit increases they receive, with an additonal 5% increase, phased over 2 years. The other Confidential employee, being mid-manage- ment oriented, is suggested to be placed in the Mid-Management negotiating group without additional benefits given, as the Mid- Management package allows for additional benefits over S.E. I.U. Clerical. 8 0 Brad Humphrey, Atascadero resident, urges Council to consider this proposal carefully, as it is an issue causing great concern among other City staff, and creating a morale issue. He feels that that being exempt from bargaining should not provide a 5% differential. Council discusses provision of differential compensation to Confidential employees,exempt from negotiating, a possible need for a separate classification showing their additional responsi- bilities, and employee concerns. Mayor Norris reviews the status of positions in question and Administrative Services Director Jorgensen clarifies the employees in the positon and their qualifications. MOTION: Councilmember Bourbeau moves to adopt Resolution 104-87, with the exception of Section 2 (Confidential Compensation) ; Councilmember Borgeson seconds; motion caries 4-1 (Councilmember Handshy opposed) E-1 PROPOSED BORDEAUX HOUSE SANITARY SEWER BYPASS - FINANCING Public Works Director Paul Sensibaugh reviews the limits of the study Cost of the project is over proposed estimate by $65,000. Staff recommends that the additional funds be approp- riated by Council from Sewer Annexation Fees received. No public comment given on this item. MOTION: Councilmmber Bourbeau moves to proceed with the southside sewer project, as proposed, and approve additional construction funds from annexation fees; Councilmember Mackey seconds; motion carries unanimously E-2 AWARD OF SEWER CLEANING (I & I) BID TO MILTON SIMON - $54 ,012. 80 Public Works Director Paul Sensibaugh requests Council to award the sewer cleaning portion of the proposed bid to Milton Simon, and to continue action of awarding the t.v. monitoring portion of the bid to the next Council Meeting. MOTION: Councilmember Bourbeau awards the Sewer Cleaning portion of the I and I bid to Milton Simon for $54 ,012. 84; and continues action on the t.v. monitoring portion of the bid to the October 27th • Council Meeting; Councilmember Borgeson seconds; motion carries unanimously. 9 E-3 RESOLUTION 109-87 - PROPOSED SEWER SERVICE TO A PORTION OF LOT 16, BLOCK 13 (9925 MORRO ROAD) (EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH OF ATASCADERO) AND INCORPORATING THE AREA INTO SANITATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT #2 Public Works Director Paul Sensibaugh states that sewer is avail- able to this site along Highway 41, where the sewer to San Gabriel picks up. This is not considered a line extension, as nobody except the San Gabriel School can connect to the extension outside the Urban Services boundary line. No public comment is given on this item. MOTION: Councilmember Bourbeau moves approval of Resolution 109-87; Councilmember Borgeson seconds; Motion carries unanimously E-4 RESOLUTION 110-87 - SEWER SERVICE EXTENSION TO LOTS 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 , 15, 24, PORTIONS OF LOTS 6 & 7 OF TRACT 5 AND PARCELS 1, 2, AND 3 OF PARCEL MAP AT 81-281 (EL BORDO AVENUE) Paul Sensibaugh, Public Works Director , requests a continuation of this item as an environmental statement presented to the Planning Commission for Spanish Ridge Development does not cover this annexation. MOTION: Councilmember Bourbeau moves continuation of this item to the October 27, 1987 Council Meeting; Councilwoman Borgeson seconds; Motion caries unanimously Prepared by: __2 Ka n Vaughan De uty City Cler 10 Mr ETh3 D • CITY OF ATASCADERO SCHEDULE OF DISBURSEMENTS FOR THE MONTH OF SEPTEMBER, 1987 DISBURSEMENTS: Hand Warrant Register for September, 1987 111,800.00 09/04/87 Accounts Payable Warrants 83,370 .23 09/11/87 Accounts Payable Warrants 30,626.82 09/18/87 Accounts Payable Warrants 199,399.78 09/25/87 Accounts Payable Warrants 104,701.62 Service Charge-Mastercard/Visa 2. 50 09/02/87 Payroll Checks #40290-40404 87,122.77 09/16/87 Payroll Checks #40405-40525 94,692. 77 09/30/87 Payroll Checks #40552-40670 94,106.80 TOTAL 805,823.29 LESS: Voided Check #34948 32.50 Voided Check #35557 249.48 Voided Check #36566 425 .00 Voided Check #36906 37 .10 Voided Check #36957 27.00 Voided Check #36932 46 , 525. 52 Voided Check #36035 65.81 TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS 758, 460. 88 I , DAVID JORGENSEN, do hereby certify and declare that demands enumerated and referred to in the foregoing register are accurate and just claims against the City and that there are funds available for payment thereof in the City Treasury. The breakdown detail on all accounts is available for your viewing in the Finance office. DAVID SOR ENSEN 0 � IV — • Admin. Services Director WEN3AGENDA /v �1TEM# CITY OF ATASCADERO • SCHEDULE OF CASH RECEIPTS AND TRANSFERS IN FOR THE MONTH OF SEPTEMBER, 1987 CASH RECEIPTS: Taxes: Property Tax 6,695.34 Sales Tax 196,209.91 Franchise Tax 2,997.41 Livestock-Head Day Tax 123.48 Motor Vehicle In-Lieu 68,123.89 Cigarette Tax 3,740.72 Development Impact Tax 8,137.50 Other Receipts: Licenses/Permits/Fees 25,481. 23 Fines/Penalties/Overages 893.28 Police Reimbursements 11,931.12 Zoo Reserve Fund 616 .00 Parks and Recreation Fees 21,089.26 Gas Tax 23,843.00 Traffic Safety 8,490.71 Local Transportation 2,759. 50 Development Fees 8,718.47 Zoo Receipts 4,155.82 Rents/Concessions 500.00 • Sales-Maps/Publications/Reports 211.80 Special Police Services 171.00 Miscellaneous Services 1, 201.41 TOTAL CASH RECEIPTS 396,090.85 FUND TRANSFERS IN: Sanitation Administrative Charge 5,582. 33 Sanitation Fund Reimbursement 29, 060.63 TOTAL FUND TRANSFERS IN 34,642.96 OTHER CASH RECEIPTS: Performance Bonds 5,000.00 Bail/Bonds 740 .00 Planning Permit Deposits 1,990.00 Reimbursement to Expense 1,175. 52 Refunds 2,179.24 TOTAL OTHER CASH RECEIPTS 11, 084.76 • CITY OF ATASCADERO • CASH ACTIVITY SUMMARY FOR THE MONTH OF SEPTEMBER, 1987 BEGINNING CASH RESOURCES 3 ,111,632. 78 ADD: RECEIPTS 441,818.57 FUND TRANSFERS 34,642.96 INVESTMENTS .REDEEMED 1,180 ,000 .00 LESS: DISBURSEMENTS 758,460.88 FUND TRANSFERS 34,642.96 INVESTMENTS MADE 1,070 ,000 .00 ENDING CASH RESOURCES 2,904 ,990.47 SCHEDULE OF CASH RESOURCES Int. Due AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1987 Rate Date Checking Account: Mid-State Bank 76,247.14 Certificates of Deposit: Cal America Savings 99, 000 .00 8.50 03/09/88 Beverly Hills Savings 99,000.00 8.60 03/28/88 • Pacific Savings Bank 99,000.00 8.65 03/28/88 Other Investments: Bankers Accept.-Wells Fargo 491,203.33 7.28 12/07/87 Local Agency Inv. Fund 2, 040 , 000.00 7.71 N/A Other Cash Resources: Petty Cash 540 .00 TOTAL CASH RESOURCES 2,904 , 990.47 Gere Sibbach City Treasurer • • M E M O R A N D U M TO: City Council October 27, 1987 VIA: Michael Shelton, City Manager FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Tentative Parcel Map 22-85: Time Extension Request (El Camino Associates/Cuesta Engineering: 6905 E1 Camino Real - Century Plaza) BACKGROUND: At their October 6th, 1987 meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed the above-referenced subject on their consent calendar, and recom- mended a time extension to October 14, 1988 . RECOMMENDATION: • Approval of the time extension for one year (October 14, 1988) , based upon the findings in the attached staff report, dated October 6, 1987, and the conditions set forth at the time the map was originally ap- proved. HE:ph Encls: Staff Report - October 6, 1987 Staff Report - August 19 and September 16 , 1985 City of Atascadero Item: A. 3 STAFF REPORT • FOR: Planning Commission Meeting Date: 10/6/87 BY: 4 Doug Davidson, Associate Planner File No: TPM 22-85 Project Address: 6905 El Camino Real (Century Plaza) SUBJECT: To allow a time extension in order to give the applicant additional time to comply with the conditions of the tentative map. A. SITUATION AND FACTS: 1. Applicant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .El Camino Associates 2. Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .CR (Commercial Retail) 3. Existing Use. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Shopping Center 4. Adjacent Zoning and Use. . . . . .North: P and CR, vacant and commercial South: CR, commercial • East: CR, commercial West: CR, commercial 5. General Plan Designation. . . . .Retail Commercial 6. Environmental Status. . . . . . . . .Negative Declaration previously recorded. B. ANALYSIS: The applicant has submitted this map for final check. However , to ensure that the map would not expire on October 14, 1987, a time extension was applied for on August 28, 1987. As stated in Exhi- bit A, there have been no changes which would effect this approv- al. Staff sees no problem in granting this time extension. C. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the time extension request based on the findings in Exhibit A and the conditions set forth at the time the map was originally approved. Approval of this one year time extension shall expire on October 14, 1988. DD:ps • • • EXHIBIT A - Findings for Approval (time extension) Tentative Parcel Map 22-85 (E1 Camino Associates - Century Plaza) i October 6, 1987 FINDINGS: 1. There have been no changes to the provisions of the General Plan or Zoning Ordinance applicable to the project since the approval of the entitlement. 2. There have been no changes in the character of the site or its surroundings which affect how the standards of the General Plan or Zoning Ordinance apply to the project. 3 • City of Atascadero Item: B-1 (B) STAFF REPORT FOR: Planning Commission Meeting Date: 8/19/85 & 9/16/85 BY: Doug Davidson, Assistant Planner File No: TPM 22-85 Project Address: 6905 El Camino Real (Century Plaza Shopping Center SUBJECT: To allow the division of an eight acre parcel into three lots of 5.4, 2. 5 and .21 acres each in the CR (Commercial Retail) zone. BACKGROUND: Tentative Parcel Map AT 821118:1 was approved at the City Council meeting of March 14, 1983. This map was never finaled. In June, 1985 a tract map proposal of 15 commercial lots was submitted to staff. This map was sent out to the various agencies and utilities, but was withdrawn on July 30, 1985. This three lot commercial parcel map re- places the 15 lot subdivision. • Notice of public hearing was published in the Atascadero News on Aug- ust 9, 1985 and all owners of record property located within 300 feet were notified on that date. At the Planning Commission meeting of August 19, 1985, the item was presented to the Commission but continued in order to gather more in- formation and prepare final conditions. A. LOCATION: 6905 El Camino Real (Parcel 1 of CO 73-06) B. SITUATION AND FACTS: 1. Request. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .To allow the division of an eight acre parcel into three lots of 5,4, 2.5, and .21 acres each. 2. Applicant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .E1 Camino Associates 3. Engineer. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Kennaly Engineering 4. Site Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Approximately eight acres 5. Streets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .El Camino Real is a divided ar- terial with a 100 foot wide right-of-way. Santa Ysabel is an urban collector with a 50 foot wide right-of-way. "South Mall Extension" presently extends Tentative Parcel Map 22-85 (El Camino Associates) from Santa Ysabel to Atascadero f Creek and has a 40 foot wide right-of-way. 6. Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .CR (Commercial Retail) 7. Existing Use. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Retail commercial center 8. Adjacent zoning and Use. . . . . .North: P and CR, vacant and commercial South: CR, commercial East: CR, commercial West: CR, commercial 9. General Plan Designation. . . . .Retail Commercial 10. Terrain. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .Mostly level with some steeper slopes along southern edge of property. A segment of Santa .. Ysabel creek traverses the site. 11. Environmental Status. . . . . . . . .Negative Declaration C. ANALYSIS: There is no minimum lot size in the CR (Commercial Retail) zone. Staff review will focus on the relationship between this proposed parcel map and the future development of Century Plaza., as pro- posed in Conditional Use Permit 26-84. The previous owner of Plaza del Camino shopping center obtained approval of a tentative parcel map dividing the existing developed half of the site from the undeveloped remainder. This map was never finaled. This new map basically achieves the same goal, that of separating Phase I from Phase II. However, in this case, the Happy Steak restaurant will comprise its own separate parcel (Parcel 2) . Parcel l consists of the existing shopping center, the area of the additional two proposed theaters, future retail space (Building K) , future office space (Building J) , and an addi- tion to Building H (Building I) (see Exhibit D) . Parcel 3 is the remaining undeveloped land. This map will accomplish the finan- cing and ownership objectives of the applicant. However, by a design, easements, parking agreements, development standards and other methods the building and parking complex will function as a unified whole. Many questions of staff have been answered with the submittal of more information shown on the map. The existing parking area in the northwest corner of the site is still mostly a part of Parcel 3. Staff felt that it should be a part of Parcel 1. However, it is has been determined that parking demand for Phase I is met without this parking area. Staff recommended that a driveway ac- cess from South Mall Extension be provided which would connect to 2 �� a W Tentative Parcel Map 22-85 (E1 Camino Associates) the driveway in front of the theater and hence to E1 Camino Real. This would provide for adequate circulation for Phase I of the project. The map presented shows this through access as a part of Parcel I; however, the complete connection is shown to be achieved in Phase II of the project. Staff continues to feel that this through access shall be accomplished during Phase I. Build- ing K presents no problem in its phasing (Phase II) ; however, its associated circulation is fundamental to Phase I functioning on its own (Exhibit D) . Related to this theme of auto circulation is the need for a pedes- trian link from the civic center through the entire Century Plaza to implement the City' s General Plan. The proposed location of the pedestrian bridge needs to be shown on the final map to insure that a pedestrian crossing is achieved. The area subject to inundation (100 year storm) as well as the existing and proposed easements are now shown on the map as staff had requested. Drainage and sewer easements are still needed to be offered for dedication and_ shall be reviewed by the Public Works Department. The applicant has proposed a culvert system for Phase I, which allows for the natural flow of the drainage for the remainder of the land (Phase III) . This portion of the drainage swale (Santa Ysabel Creek) will be culverted at the time of future development. The alignment of South Mall Extension and Lewis Avenue is not shown, however , on the tentative map. This will help determine if the sight distance along South Mall Extension is adequate. In sum, staff agrees that the parcel configuration does not con- flict with City policies or regulations, and will be consistent with the existing and future development of the site. D. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Tentative Parcel Map 22-85 based on the findings and conditions contained in Exhibit A. DGD:ps ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A - Findings/Conditions of Approval Exhibit B - Location Map Exhibit C - Parcel Map Exhibit D Site Plan - Conditional Use Permit 26-84 • 3 n�✓ Tentative Parcel Map 22-85 (E1 Camino Associates) EXHIBIT A - Tentative Parcel Map 22-85 Findings/Conditions of Approval September 16, 1985 FINDINGS: 1. The creation of these parcels conform to all applicable zoning and the General Plan. 2. The creation of these parcels in conformance with the recommended conditions of approval will not have a significant adverse effect upon the environment, and preparation of an Environmental Impact Report is not necessary. 3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development that is proposed. 4. The site is physically suitable for the density of development that is proposed. - 5. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. 6 . The design of the subdivision or the type of improvement will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivi- sion; or that substantially equivalent alternate easements are provided. 7. The proposed subdivision complies with Section 66474. 6 of the State Subdivision Map Act, as to methods of handling and discharge of waste. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL revised 9/16/85) (T.P.M. 22-85 1. A preliminary soils report shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer. If tests indicate critically expansive soils or other soils problems, corrective measures shall be taken. 2. Water shall be obtained from the Atascadero Mutual Water Company and water lines shall exist at the frontage of each parcel or its public utility easement prior to recordation of the final map. 3. All existing and proposed utility easements, pipelines, pedestrian bridge easement, and other easements are to be shown on the final map. If there are other building or other restrictions related to the easements, they shall be noted on the final map. Prior to filing of the final map, the applicant shall submit for review and approval by the Department of Public Works and the Community Development Depart- ment conceptual plans for implementing the Atascadero Creekway Plan including pedestrian bridge and pedestrian ways. 4. Drainage and erosion control plans, prepared by a registered civil engineer, shall be submitted for review and approval by the Plan- ning Department prior to issuance ofbuilding permits in conjunc- tion with installation of driveways, access easements or structures. 5. Plan and profile drawings of proposed individual driveways and driveway easements shall be submitted for approval by the Planning and Public Works Department in order to determine average grade and appropriate improvement requirements. This shall include the driveway from South Mall Extension, around the proposed theater , and on to El Camino Real. 6. Water mains and fire hydrants shall be required to supply the re- quired fire flow for buildings constructed on the site. 7. Public improvements, including curb, gutter , and sidewalk, are re- quired and the design is to be approved by the Public Works De- partment. This review shall include approval of the California Department of Transportation for work within their right-of-way. 8. A drainage easement shall be offered for dedication along with the natural drainage way or drainage culvert alignment to the City of Atascadero. This offer shall require acceptance of the Public Works Department and will be consented to, but need not be accepted. 9. Applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City of Atasca- dero guaranteeing that the maintenance of the storm drain facili- ties shall be the responsibility of the property owner. Agreement • shall require acceptance of the Public Works Director and the City Attorney. The agreement shall be recorded with the deed to each parcel at the time it is first conveyed and a note to this effect shall be placed on the parcel map. / 10. A right-of-way along South Mall Extension or an alignment accept- able to the Director of Public Works shall be dedicated to the City of Atascadero. Otherwise, proof shall be submitted to the Public Works Department that the dedication has been done. 11. A sewer easement shall be offered for dedication to the City of Atascadero along existing sewer main where distance between the centerline of the sewer main and edge of the easement is less than 7 1/2 feet. Dedication shall be shown on the final map. A future sewer easement shall be dedicated, to the City of Atascadero to serve Capistrano Avenue. It shall be a minimum 15 feet wide and on an alignment acceptable to the Director of Public Works. The easement shall be shown on the final map. 12. An in-lieu sewer connection fee of $26.35 per fixture shall be due in addition to the usual connection, tap-in, and installation fees for the new lots are created. Fees shall be paid at the time of connection to public sewers. 13. Participate in eliminating a portion of flood hazard to the prop- erty by posting a performance securities in the amount of $10, 333 with the City to be used for a drainage improvement project for channelizing the outflow from Atascadero Lake to Atascadero Creek. This shall be collected prior to the issuance of building permits for each parcel. In the event that a future assessment district is formed for area drainage improvements that include this pro- ject, then credit in the amount of the deposit will be applied • toward final apportionment of the assessment if allowed by assess- ment district proceedings. 14. All conditions herein specified shall be complied with prior to filing of the final map. 15. A final map drawn in substantial conformance with the approved tentative map and in compliance with all conditions set forth herein shall be submitted for review and approval in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City Lot Division Ordinance prior to recordation. a. Monuments shall be set at all new property corners created and a registered civil engineer or licensed land surveyor shall indicate by certificate on the final map that corners have been set or will be set by a date specific and that they will be sufficient to enable the survey to be retraced. b. A recently updated preliminary title report shall be submit- ted for review in conjunction with the processing of the final map. 16 . Approval of this tentative parcel map shall expire two years from the date of City Council approval unless an extension of time is granted pursuant to a written request prior to the expiration date. 2 'Y. 6. _DERO Plannirib Depa Map No. 7 a • G, UFHI R\FHI 111 •�� " "� s y,ti ��\--�.. ;� _ SL zy >S�.i F,_�� s:r.-.-� ray[-` �-t f=C•'p l''�C�i:'.� s:t�_�� '•'c. -J� �`- \• �. /� �l � 1ST '' '� � ,,;�==�,,.-Sgtil �:' •, `, � ��:�,. GLYC SC•1 \, / -.. �`.IIS!^i �.c�;•}.-�L-.r��r�` '`� \., rla •� �'�. 'br� . it -- .• a�4, • � �9 � •� �VVJ �z :;4 -RSF=Y ��'he /•' '=i=ce/� ~... .:�'• �\ 'L \^a. y t4 � � —\� �•.' ��� / CR irk >i z`, ...s V,//' ' cC `\ .��ro_ �l j,• \:: /.:/ ,.`., / ...`y',^',�•� RSr "`�� \//••c'�..nom��..`� �'� 41� + •, / \ '� ' ° I' �.'•+'/ ,; ���1;'.•/n �/s«° �.�•1\ CR \h;y/�'�I'\ / c.n• /�\"'��� //JPS \� a / // /r\''' i ( I r'T° r ~'��!"�,� '`.+1 •� ...111 - • I'r.,' 1`'y j; ~-1`/i 1�`.��Sf S j •• ,.r r.n n» ,!°ti : \..�,��+ �••.� `�'�r� - •:� '� -•�' R�F%i6 ��'_ ���� �r�1�•�., - d��\y�-1,c..�_.�i;:;l :• � 'Z"1 y'�i�:?`s• 17 I `� , ��8 a W•a� �t i I W � 1 `` $ OL� it i j �' �Ow — ..r`� •'\ u 1 0 11 W I ; ��� _ .w ,�• �` _ Tot l t 1 1 Ekzt W cjl 1 .I / -C -C Im (l) oq Ile a-j C-0 zz A<l C-1 E 1�Nv AG SNDA • M E M O R A N D U M TO: City Council October 27, 1987 VIA: Michael Shelton, City Manager FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director _ SUBJECT: Tentative Parcel Map 23-85: Time Extension Request (Bill Carroll: 5495 Traffic Way) BACKGROUND: At their regular meeting of October 6, 1987, the Planning Commission considered the above-referenced matter on its Consent Calendar and recommended approval of the Time Extension Request. RECOMMENDATION: • Approval of the time extension request for one year (September 23, 1988) , based on the findings in the attached staff report, dated Oct- ober 6, 1987 and the conditions set forth at the time the map was originally approved. HE:ph Encls: Staff Report - October 6, 1987 Staff Report - September 3, 1985 City of Atascadero Item: A.4 STAFF REPORT • FOR: Planning Commission Meeting Date: 10/6/87 �D BY: Doug Davidson, Associate Planner File No: TPM 23-85 Project Address: 5495 Traffic Way SUBJECT: To allow a time extension in order to give the applicant additional time to comply with the conditions of the tentative map. A. SITUATION AND FACTS: 1. Applicant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Bill Carroll 2. Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IP (Industrial Park) 3. Existing Use. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Meat Processing Plant 4. Adjacent Zoning and Use. . . . . .North: IP, Industrial South: P, Stadium Park East: L (FH) , vacant West: RMF/16, residential 5. General Plan Designation. . . . . Industrial Park 6. Environmental Status. . . . . . . . .Negative Declaration previously recorded. B. ANALYSIS: The applicant has submitted this map for final check. However, to ensure that the map would not expire on September 23, 1987, a time extension was applied for on September 22, 1987 . As stated in Exhibit A, there have been no changes which would effect this ap- proval. Staff sees no problem in granting this time extension. C. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the time extension request based on the findings in Exhibit A and the conditions set forth at the time the map was originally approved. Approval of this one year time extension shall expire on September 23, 1988. DD:ps 0 • EXHIBIT A - Findings for Approval (time extension) Tentative Parcel Map 23-85 (Carroll) October 6, 1987 FINDINGS: 1. There have been no changes to the provisions of the General Plan or Zoning Ordinance applicable to the project since the approval of the entitlement. 2. There have been no changes in the character of the site or its surroundings which affect how the standards of the General Plan or Zoning Ordinance apply to the project. 3 City of Atascadero Item: B-3 STAFF REPORT FOR: Planning Commission Meeting Date: 9/3/85 BY: Meg Morris, Assistant Planner File No: TPM 23-85 Project Address: 5495 Traffic Way SUBJECT• To allow the creation of two lots where three now exist in the IP (Industrial Park) zone. BACKGROUND: Precise Plan 13-85 was submitted March 4, 1985 by Bill Carroll to in- stall a mini storage facility behind an existing meat packing plant. This application was withdrawn by the applicant June 4, 1985. Notice of public hearing was published in the Atascadero News on Aug- ust 23, 1985 and all owners of record property within 300 feet were notified on that date. iA. LOCATION: 5495 Traffic Way (portion of Lot 13 , Admin. Park) B. SITUATION AND FACTS: 1. Request. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .To allow the creation of two lots where three lots now exist. 2. Applicant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..Bill Carroll 3. Engineer. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Dan Stewart 4. Site Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Approximately 1.39 acres 5. Streets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Traffic Way is a City-maintained road with a 60 foot right-of-way 6. Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IP (Industrial Park) 7. Existing Use. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Meat processing plant 8. Adjacent Zoning and Use. . . . . .North: IP, industrial complex South: P - Stadium Park East: L (FH) , vacant West: RMF/16 , residential 9 . General Plan Designation. . . . . Industrial Park 10. Terrain. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Flat at front of lot, then slopes gently down to Atsacadero a+ ' � '�,�/�fr-\��qY y \y Pt- �j� �`' 'C.�, fax•;�\`��,.,+ -�W� ' ,�`� .• .. r r\ i'th >t9r,,/ .` ,� yi ���=✓ �lY .y' � c`34 _ f.'g, L ,t 4+ '.., a •. i�i'. \\ ew '�•l y+ y 1 ,\ i1 /T•+���`s�i=b b • 'SbI�" :>•� F.,C'. •>s •`�, •• v�1 +.a, �:/`J \�`X 5 r r`!r" 'ti+f 1 f•. ' ti �Crti=?, • //;♦;:_+y�i� ...w .��•/• . I tirri-`,rico =Slrjr �\.. S\i",.a'a '�• ii �° f ao 1 a ('� s a.•yic'�'!•4s.,t...•n..1!'•_, 'l , Ao. '' ��/r[y\ {✓ \.t � S.yam, yt+S.-�,�,1�0 !. t Com\ 'r �t+e .. 2, ^y F,„'r �• 'L• .4.� nY c+tiS�..c\;4� 1,.'�/a;�.'�•;'��.:. ""�'r/w1e//' r4. N-`j�.ary.��+r a," hb7�i°/.,{iJ ��1: l.r„(\\` �.> ,aG .�`s'•4•-�..'f y wr ao.� 11 <� /elm/ /Y lr /�.r, J• � p�r:•e �� .v".>� s>�a,. i ,rr':�.'i�.��l•(i''r:��i� s,it���'i"•��r�`'/�-h:'/;�',°'..t .,,1r O ,\".(�..� �y�ll � • �y ;/': Y%.t s' ''y�• .<{1',rt,ytv�'o •f.:-� a }'S=�rr�V o �j\ \\! ' �•9 yy� - nJi U �2'1'.C• r+a a,rT r.r°3�:�,: t,���y�T�ty 6i`.�tiy�.� ,�� .a � 'vot � 6 - \•� >' �� ...r n.\ 11.�`e.«�tt /'�-i �,r. '°.`9\�ppCQ��q-•,'�--.�•..\.. +a.'' •.s��a ,t� ,4•• a \��� - 'rt•i i f?�--'`s n.e ' � :. ioa eo Y•JZ,�:�"1 r 8 R J` �O "� , �fr'���� r�� ,f �a a. . !a'•r ',',,,� .P^�. , _ ,�tIFT(1�} nFi •�a r{,;/' • ..i � \ •>>�S�j \ ,'oa> ra •:q� sms a• ,, �9 v. � ••°`�+B - u� "\••.�+a. •,/�'" ;• r ,� �:.-•'o ��Y1 � •P2t��J .�\ i V.•' r f-a `� t / soK ,au r, `,,o, 'ms's_/ `s4 sh' • `11Cj2`�.��'j}^ ,a !t., -` � :d ".'/� `\ ol •sus .� , mss• t •L,l.-k' _ ,r +t RIFH) Sq , ?�6/ i � J C /Ff 'l tti I' mow:•: tr, -TI ON {,'� , ��> / ';`1` i,•,_...ter,.. f —3Y o ••?,•({,`-� -\ - »' `�,o.��i�',f ��S �r q/•�:[�///� ••�•,•7 a7Y•,• r'> `' (/�,n ,r/t-�rio /''•i, ,I�t: r =� :; ,�',YA s: ,ios -4 <.`dY =, /; QA t �F:•���� r.',; -/Cj♦ 'J(1 ,;�:�C•e, ` w ,�u, U�`�� •�� �� uq'1 i'I��,�sl`,� I •J.i 9,� �d�><,„�..b. ham'JYi''v� � ;�.y ♦-,=_:�/•.'�s,T N�"t'�.r•�r >',Ter-' > :,� -• ..+'0•,'.!: tf'fo'r�. 1,:. •o its`A�t2<'..\{1l-:vl T"- �a!a. /t% - [r�..d,,/+�,` lsw�.a .T�•_-••._ ,',,1SL.,,` E/.,�P/ '2�.i..�fa�_1 ^ra: /.'S, �,, �//// xJ a 'lr_r,o� "a. ��b%v ��.v(: T .,�G� ''s I' e;,'.,. �(•/-�.� +J<.+Cl•'. �i^r+Ae�:+e.'• �: �'�.i 13 .11 t{L q•�� GALTr \- r> ."�-.. ♦ � CJ'/I. •l.: �s•r , ' 7 '+rr, . � R F. 'Q' 1•Y. r/1� 'i��,n a1>• L(.� �`" \ , C �'Q.. 1 Y`+,� .r,��y :r f�'�e 1��i \.j •4'�\ '�s}�o si.i ,`•Ci�"}_, -,a,_^�'•I'`��\-/I •��,r'r 1�.1':r� �,= h�a ��hy �,•• `+4 l` , �/// .\\��./`s• ^>�• v��` Y•'••i•�• .S•iS-'�'S{ ��-7.. :��i� '1 {F�/• Dai !. :+1� \r'. s '• ! ,\ �,.i%`,�,/>�,Feo�'•Rda4..� �'<u i'� a.•,.,. ,.ft.t/.(,y y�i:,/ �If i�l..,j�!�^..7✓i.'o i•� :Y>��:',r ! /:o, � ..v k;r'a't,-'- "�- t u;!:• � 'r: ,.•� X (�� ,,,. ti ,, v 9.• ?..• `/o J y JS T..:-t ,...1,�.•. a, t r;.., ,, LJ,gid, '.••a��' a' S<�cs �/ •;� •,t•�r.� ,•�/ t!>.li ' ifs-1 ,: � I. tV i `,'. ,:.• •.t\ RS 7- -- F.zY i� -1 J� /y � a 0 AC OW / a• / ,spa d /I �A/� �'-ji' :. • � fie:. / `5 to•,�� / ' � �. , 1 1 y_ � �' �� • •. tom.. n•�. iii• 7••. ar• ex.4it-3IT �J TF—1 y 1 1 V �• „i TN MAC ate----------- - RFy�Q V�TY�N• • • :� aj4, ,�� � o ;� � may , � ti pCNki : rte q 3 7�r Z, ani Z Z 'i Tentative Parcel Map*3-85 (Bill Carroll) EXHIBIT A - Tentative Parcel Map 23-85 Findings/Conditions of Approval . . September 3, 1985 FINDINGS:~ 1. The `creation of these parcels conform to all. applicable zoning and the General Plan. 2. The creation of these parcels in conformance with the recommended conditions of approval will not have a significant adverse effect upon the environment, and preparation of an Environmental Impact Report is not necessary. 3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development that is proposed. 4. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. - 5. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.. 6. The design of the subdivison or the type of improvement will not i conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large for ac- cess through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision; or that substantially equivalent alternate easements are provided. 7. The proposed subdivision complies with Section 66474. 6 of the State Subdivision Map Act, as to methods of handling and discharge of waste. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. A preliminary soils report shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer . If tests indicate critically expansive soils or other soils problems , corrective measures shall be taken. ' 2. Water shall be obtained from the Atascadero Mutual Water Company and water lines shall exist at the frontage of each parcel or its public utility easement prior to recordation of the final map. 3. All existing and proposed utility easements, pipelines and other easements are to be shown on the final map. If there are other building or other restrictions related to the easements, they shall be noted on the final map. 1 k Tentative Parcel Map 13-85 (Bill Carroll) 4. Drainage and erosion control plans, prepared by a registered civil . engineer, shall be submitted for review and approval by the Plan- ning Department prior to issuance of building permits in conjunc- tion with installation of driveways, access easements or structures. 5. Plan and profile drawings of proposed individual driveways and driveway easements shall be submitted for approval by the Planning and Public Works Departments in order to determine average grade and appropriate improvement requirements. 6. Plans showing driveway access in detail shall be submitted for re- view and approval by the Fire Department prior to approval of the final map. 7. All conditions herein specified shall be complied with prior to filing of the final map. 8. A final map drawn in substantial conformance with the approved tentative map and in compliance with all conditions set forth herein shall be submitted for review and approval in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City Lot Division Ordinance prior to recordation. a. Monuments shall be set at all new property corners created and a registered civil engineer or licensed land surveyor . shall indicate by certificate on the final map that corners have been set or will be set by a date specific and that they will be sufficient to enable the survey to be retraced. b. A recently updated 'preliminary title report shall be submit- ted for review in conjunction with the processing of the final map. 9. Approval of this tentative parcel map shall expire two years from the date of City Council approval unless an extension of time is granted pursuant to a written request prior to the expiration ,date. 10. The proposed lot lines shall be altered to provide the proper Uni- form Building Code setback for a building without a fire wall; or the . existing building located on the proposed property line shall be brought into conformance with Uniform Building Code wall pro- tection requirements, or the building shall be moved or relocated to satisfy this requirement. 2 Tentative Parcel Map 2- -85 (Bill Carroll) Creek. . 11. Environmental Status . . . . . . . . .Negative Declaration C. ANALYSIS: In the IP zone, there are no minimum lot size standards under pro- visions of the zoning ordinance. Current lot line configurations show the existing meat packing plant to occupy the two smaller lots which front on Traffic Way. One of these existing buildings is built across this property line. The proposed parcel map would eliminate the property line which bisects the building. The current back parcel is a flag lot which slopes down to Atas- cadero Creek. The proposed parcel map would provide the back parcel a larger workable building area. The submitted parcel map shows a 35 foot access easement across the front parcel to the back parcel. Staff, and particularly the Fire Department, has concerns with this representation on the map. A site check reveals that there is a utility pole, gas pump and parking strip obstructing this proposed access at this time. If the accessory building located along the proposed property line i does not conform to Uniform Building Code wall protection require- ments, staff would have concerns regarding its location. The creation of two lots where three previously existed ensures that the existing buildings will not be located on any lot lines and that any new use will be on a separate legal lot. Staff feels this tentative parcel map does not conflict with any City policies or ordinances. D. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Tentative Parcel Map 23-85 based on the findings and conditions of approval contained in Exhibit A. MM:ps ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A - Findings/Conditions of Approval Exhibit B - Location Map Exhibit C - Parcel Map 2 n'1: rACirN!)A • M E M O R A N D U M TO: City Council October 27, 1987 VIA: Michael Shelton, City Manager FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director i SUBJECT: Tentative Parcel Map 27-87 APPLICANT: Ralph Brink LOCATION: 7565 Sombrilla REQUEST: To allow the resubdivision of two (2) parcels containing 1. 46 acres into three (3) lots ranging in size between 20 ,000 square feet and 23,100 square feet BACKGROUND: • On September 1, 1987 the Planning Commission conducted a public hear- ing on the above matter . The Commission' s discussion was focused on the configuration of the resultant lots, which would create two flag lots and would necessitate excessive grading to develop the two uphill lots (see Minutes Excerpts - 9/1/87) . This item was continued to the October 6, 1987 meeting, with a suggestion to the applicant that he return with a redesign of his project. In response to the Commission' s action, the applicant submitted a re- vised map with all three lots having frontage on Sombrilla which would allow for the development of a single family dwelling on the lower portion of each, while maintaining the steeper slopes in an open state. After much discussion (see Minutes Excerpts 10/6/87) , the Commission recommended approval of TPM 27-87 subject to the findings and conditions contained in the staff report, with modification to Condition #12 as follows: "12. The area of the site located above the existing 950 foot contour line as shown on the revised tentative map dated September 24 , 1987 shall be placed in a scenic easement wherein no building construction or placement shall occur . Said scenic easement and building restrictions shall be shown and noted on the final map. " RECOMMENDATION: • Approval of Tentative Parcel Map 27-87 (as revised) based on the Find- ings for Approval contained in the Staff Report, dated September 1, 1987 and the Approved Revised Conditions of Approval, dated October 6, 1987. HE:ph Encls: Staff Report - September 1, 1987 Memorandum - October 6, 1987 Revised Map Revised Conditions of Approval - October 6 , 1987 Planning Commission Minutes Excerpts - September 1, 1987 Planning Commission Minutes Excerpts - October 6, 1987 • CITY OF ATASCADERO Item: B-5 STAFF REPORT FOR: Planning Commission Meeting Date: September 1, 1987 BY: C6on Ecklund, Assistant Planner File No: TPM 27-87 SUBJECT: Subdivision of one parcel containing 1. 46 acres into three (3) lots ( Lot 1 - 22, 600 sq. ft. ; Lot 2 - 21,000 sq. ft. ; Lot 3- 20,000 sq. ft. ) . A. SITUATION AND FACTS: 1. Applicant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .Ralph Brink 2. Representative. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Cuesta Engineering 3. Project Address. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7565 Sombrilla Avenue 4. Legal Description. . . . . . . . . . . .Parcels A & B of AT 82-25, 32/PM/67, City of Atascadero 5. Site Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1. 46 acres 6. Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .RSF-X 7. General Plan Designation. . . . .High Density Single Family 8. Existing Use. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Parcel 1 - Single Family Dwelling. Parcel 2 - Vacant Parcel 3 - Vacant 9. Environmental Status. . . . . . . . .Negative Declaration posted August 5, 1987 Staff Report - TPM 27-87 7565 Sombrilla Avenue Page Two B. ANALYSIS: The application before the Commission proposes the subdivision of one parcel containing 1. 46 acres into three (3) parcels containing: Lot 1 - 22, 600 sq. ft. , Lot 2 - 21,000 sq. ft. , Lot 3 - 20, 000 sq. ft. The property proposed for subdivision is located in an RSF-X zoning district. The minimum lot size in this zone is 20, 000 square feet where sewers are available and 0. 5 acres where sewers are not available. Because sewers are available to the property the 20, 000 square foot minimum lot size is allowable under the current ordinances. Staff would like to point out to- the Commission that the proposal is allowable under the ordinance, but that staff feels the site does have several major problems. The cross slope of the site is over 35% for Lots 2 and 3. There are several large oak trees that could possibly be lost if the access road is constructed as proposed. Lots 2 & 3 will be subject to Precise Plan approval when dwellings are built on the sites. The site was divided in 1982 under AT 820309:2 and the two existing lots were created. One of the conditions of approval was that the existing "illegal" grading on site be corrected; this has not yet been accompolished. This map will, therefore, be conditioned to require the grading to be corrected prior to recordation of the final map. C. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends conditional approval of Tentative Parcel Map 27-87 subject to the findings and conditions which are attached. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A - Location and Zoning Map Exhibit B - TPM 9-87 Exhibit C - Findings for Approval Exhibit D - Conditions of Approval Q i ,`� , 1 111 • r ��: •�� � ���►.:.�� ilk; � \ •' �'� ♦ i� �� 2 a 5.lw.rl - U l� ✓s K[ IrL; V tlRµ` � I � gN � yLV7 oaf N.Z�'pi e8�N Z t01 � s I ^ d ! w + TZtT7 __ .. Ott o 4 Osr�, OIOr 0� Ot01 —i 0�� u IZZ av (� 0P Ch4 ^� , oo� � ^age u roti Exhibit "B" o Tentative Parcel Map 27-87 iR y Ry b 0, • EXHIBIT C - Findings for Approval Tentative Parcel Map 27-87 September 1 , 1987 FINDINGS: 1. The creation of these parcels conforms to the Zoning Ordinance and the General Plan. 2. The creation of these parcels, in conformance with the recommended Conditions of Approval, will not have a significant adverse effect upon the environment. The Negative Declaration prepared for the project is adequate. 3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. 4. The site is physically suitable for the density of development proposed. 5. The design of the subdivision, and the proposed improvements, will not cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish and wildlife or their habitat. 6. The design of the subdivision, and the type of improvements, will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision; or substantially equivalent alternate easements are provided. 7. The proposed subdivision complies with Section 66474. 6 of the State Subdivision Map Act as to methods of handling and discharge of waste. • EXHIBIT D - Conditions of Approval . Tentative Parcel Map 27-87 September 1, 1987 (revised 10/6/87) CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. Water shall be obtained from the Atascadero Mutual Water Company. Water lines shall exist at the frontage of each parcel or its public utilities easement prior to recordation of the final map. 2. All existing and proposed utility, pipeline, open space, or other easements are to be shown on the final map. If there are building or other restrictions related to the easements, they shall be noted on the final map. 3. Grading, drainage, and erosion control plans for private driveways and access easements, prepared by a registered civil engineer, shall be submitted for review and approval by the Community Development and Public Works Departments prior to recordation of the final map. 4. An encroachment permit shall be obtained for all work to be undertaken within the public right-of-way. 5. Road improvement Plans for Sombrilla Avenue prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer must be submitted to and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to recording final map. Improvements shall include the pave out of Sombrilla Avenue 15 feet from center line of right-of-way to edge of pavement with a 6" a.c. berm with 2 foot graded shoulders. 6. Construction of road improvements shall be completed (or guaranteed to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director) prior to recordation of final map. 7. All relocation and/or alteration of existing utilities shall be the responsibility of the developer at his sole expense. 8. All grading and drainage work required for the access easement and public improvements shall be completed prior to recording final map. 9. Offer of Dedication to City of Atascadero the following rights-of-way; or submit proof that the right-of-way has been previously dedicated, in which case only an additional 5 feet of dedication will be required for Sombrilla Avenue; the ultimate width of Sombrilla to be 25 feet from center line for the entire frontage. • 0 . Tentative Parcel Map 27-87 Conditions of Approval (revised 10/6/87) Page 2 10. Offer of Dedication to City of Atascadero for Public Utilities easements as follows: a) 6 foot P.U.E. adjacent to the new right-of-way line along Sombrilla Avenue. b) 30 foot P.U.E. within access easement. 11. The newly created lots shall be connected to the Public Sewer. All sewer annexation permit fees shall be paid for the newly created lot prior to recording the final map. 12. The area of the site located above the 950 foot contour line as shown on the revised tentative map dated September 24, 1987 shall be placed in an open space reservation wherein no building construction or placement shall occur. Said open space reservation and building restrictions shall be shown and noted on the final map. 13. A final map drawn in substantial conformance with the approved tentative map and compliance with all conditions set forth herein shall be submitted for review and approval in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City Lot Division Ordinance prior to recordation. a. Monuments shall be set at all new property corners created and a registered civil engineer or licensed land surveyor shall indicate, by certificate on the final map, that corners have been set or shall be set by a date specific and that they will be sufficient to enable the survey to be retraced. b. A recently updated preliminary title report shall be submitted for review in conjunction with the processing of the final map. C. A preliminary subdivision guarantee shall be submitted for review in conjunction with the processing of the final map. 14. The amount of tree removal shall be kept to a minimum and all grading shall take into consideration its impact on the well being of the existing trees. 15. The existing fire hydrant at the corner of Sombrilla and Pueblo shall be up-graded to City of Atascadero standards and approved by the Fire Chief. 0 Tentative Parcel Map 27-87 Conditions of Approval (revised 10/6/87) Page 3 16. Approval of this tentative map shall expire two years from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted pursuant to a written request prior to the expiration date. • MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Steven L. DeCamp, Senior Planner /40 DATE: October 6, 1987 RE: TPM 27-87 (Brink) At your meeting of September 1, 1987, the Commission considered the application of Ralph Brink for the resubdivision of two (2) parcels containing 1. 46 acres into three (3) lots ranging in size between 20,000 square feet and 22, 600 square feet. The discussion at that meeting was focused on the configuration of the resultant lots. The applicant' s proposed map would create one lot along the property frontage on Sombrilla with two lots extending up the hill behind the existing house on the site. This configuration would result in the creation of two flag lots and would necessitate excessive grading to develop the two uphill lots. The location of homes on this hillside would not be in keeping with the general development pattern throughout the remainder of the neighborhood. At the conclusion of the discussion, the Commission voted to continue the item to the October 6, 1987 meeting with a suggestion to the applicant that he return with a redesign of his project which would be more in keeping with the character of the surrounding neighborhood. In response to this action, the applicant submitted a revised map on September 24, 1987. The revised map would result in the creation of three lots ranging in size between 20, 000 square feet and 23, 100 square feet (see Exhibit B) . Each of these lots would have frontage on Sombrilla and would allow for the development of a single family dwelling on the lower portion of each, while maintaining the steeper slopes in an open state. The applicant has agreed to the imposition of building restrictions on the upper portion of each lot to guarantee such open space. As submitted, this revised map eliminates most of Staff' s earlier objection to the proposal. The revised tentative map proposes lots which exceed the maximum three-to-one width-to-depth ratio provided for in the City' s current subdivision ordinance. This provision of the ordinance precludes the development of overly long and narrow lots which have proven difficult to develop, utilize, and maintain. The ordinance does, however, provide for a waiver of this standard . where circumstances or site characteristics warrant. In the present case, Staff has determined that special circumstances (excessively steep slopes and an open space reservation) do exist which would allow for a waiver of the three-to-one standard. Tentative Parcel Map 27-87 • October 6, 1987 Page 2 RECOMMENDATION: Based on a waiver of the three-to-one width-to-depth ratio, Staff recommends conditional approval of Tentative Parcel Map 27-87 (as revised September 24, 1987) based on the Findings for Approval contained in Exhibit C of the Staff report dated September 1, 1987 and the Conditions of Approval in Exhibit D of that Staff report as revised October 6, 1987. Attachments: Exhibit A - September 1, 1987 Staff Report Exhibit B - Revised Tentative Parcel Map SLD/sld • • , e vjse� rna�o 0 J SOV Z2 Pf�' � ivvla y t�t� � 1 i 1W. titv� �j { _ - - - 1 •�'� _ _ / moi r r4 4 III m ! �.L Y7YV •�- � 1~ '17 ♦ � 3 xs �� M �llj ' AO R`, 4 y < EXHIBIT D - EtEVISED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL . Tentative Parcel Map 27-87 September 1, 1987 (revised 10/6/87) CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. Water shall be obtained from the Atascadero Mutual Water Company. Water lines shall exist at the frontage of each parcel or its public utilities easement prior to recordation of the final map. 2. All existing and proposed utility, pipeline, open space, or other easements are to be shown on the final map. If there are building or other restrictions related to the easements, they shall be noted on the final map. 3. Grading, drainage, and erosion control plans for private driveways and access easements, prepared by a registered civil engineer, shall be submitted for review and approval by the Community Development and Public Works Departments prior to recordation of the final map. 4. An encroachment permit shall be obtained for all work to be undertaken within the public right-of-way. 5. Road improvement Plans for Sombrilla Avenue prepared by a • Registered Civil Engineer must be submitted to and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to recording final map. Improvements shall include the pave out of Sombrilla Avenue 15 feet from center line of right-of-way to edge of pavement with a 6" a.c. berm with 2 foot graded shoulders. 6. Construction of road improvements shall be completed (or guaranteed to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director) prior to recordation of final map. 7. All relocation and/or alteration of existing utilities shall be the responsibility of the developer at his sole expense. 8. All grading and drainage work required for the access easement and public improvements shall be completed prior to recording final map. 9. Offer of Dedication to City of Atascadero the following rights-of-way; or submit proof that the right-of-way has been previously dedicated, in which case only an additional 5 feet of dedication will be required for Sombrilla Avenue; the ultimate width of Sombrilla to be 25 feet from center line for the entire frontage. i • Tentative Parcel Map 27-87 Conditions of Approval (revised 10/6/87) Page 2 10. Offer of Dedication to City of Atascadero for Public Utilities easements as follows: a) 6 foot P.U.E. adjacent to the new right-of-way line along Sombrilla Avenue. b) 30 foot P.U.E. within access easement. 11. The newly created lots shall be connected to the Public Sewer. All sewer annexation permit fees shall be paid for the newly created lot prior to recording the final map. 12. The area of the site located above the existing 950 foot contour line as shown on the revised tentative map dated September 24, 1987 shall be placed in a scenic easement wherein no building construction or placement shall occur. Said scenic easement and building restrictions shall be shown and noted on the final map. 13. A final map drawn in substantial conformance with the approved tentative map and compliance with all conditions set forth herein shall be submitted for review and approval in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City Lot Division Ordinance prior to recordation. a. Monuments shall be set at all new property corners created and a registered civil engineer or licensed land surveyor shall indicate, by certificate on the final map, that corners have been set or shall be set by a date specific and that they will be sufficient to enable the survey to be retraced. b. A recently updated preliminary title report shall be submitted for review in conjunction with the processing of the final map. C. A preliminary subdivision guarantee shall be submitted for review in conjunction with the processing of the final map. 14. The amount of tree removal shall be kept to a minimum and all grading shall take into consideration its impact on the well being of the existing trees. • 15. The existing fire hydrant at the corner of Sombrilla and Pueblo shall be up-graded to City of Atascadero standards and approved by the Fire Chief. ^REVISED CONDITION Tentative Parcel Map 27-87 Conditions of Approval (revised 10/6/87) Page 3 16. Approval of this tentative map shall expire two years from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted pursuant to a written request prior to the expiration date. inutes -iTentat g Commission - September 1, 1987 M TIOby Commissioner Copelan, seconded by Com ssioner hell and carried 7 :0 with a roll call vo to approve ative Parcel Map 23-87 subject to the findings and itions contained in the staff report. 4. a Parcel Map 25-87: Request ' itiated by Don Messer/North Coast Engineering to allow sub 'vision of 6.7 acres into our parcels of 1.6, 1.3, 1.7, and 2. acres each. Subject i.te is located at 5805 Capistrano A nue; legal desc iption being Parcel 1 of PM 17-106 in Atasc dero Colony. Mr. DeCamp stated that a appl' ant has requested a continuance to the meeting of Oct er , 1987 in order to review the staff report and conditions more lly. Chairman Nolan noted t the andard condition concerning relo- cation of public u ' ities was of included. Mr. DeCamp replied that this conditio should be incl ed and amendment to such will be in the staff port prior to the ctober 6, 1987 meeting. No public t timony was given on the mat r. MOTION• Made by Commissioner Hatchell, secon by Commissioner Copelan and carried 7:0 with a roll calote to continue the hearing on Tentative Parcel Map 25-87 t the - meeting of October 6, 1987. 5. Tentative Parcel Map 27-87: Request initiated by Ralph Brink (Cuesta Engineering) to al- low resubdivision of two parcels containing 0.73 acres into 3 lots containing approximately 20 ,000 square feet each. Sub- ject site is located at 7565 Sombrilla Avenue; legal descrip- tion being Lot 3 of Block E in Atascadero Colony. In presenting the staff report, Mr. DeCamp pointed out that this subdivision request is a resubdivision of two existing legal par- cels so only one additional building site on the property would be considered. He further added that although the application meets the very minimum requirements of the General Plan and Zoning Ordi- nance, there are major constraints associated with this property, and that a higher level of review may be appropriate in this case. There was discussion by the Commission concerning the original division of the site in which the map was finaled without the existing "illegal" grading on the site being corrected. There was also discussion concerning the actual buildability of a . lot versus the desirability of a buildable lot; it was noted that the Commission can have an additional level of review to make sure all mitigating factors are taken care of. There was discussion concerning the Fire Department' s concerns with regard to access • and the site 's steep slopes. 4 0 Minutes - Planning Commission - September 1, 1987 Ralph Brink, applicant, spoke in support of the request and noted he has arranged to have all utilities undergrounded. He assured the Commission that with regard to the aesthetic aspects of the site, he would do everything he could to make sure that the site is developed in compatibility with the neighborhood. In response to question from Commissioner Lopez-Balbontin, Mr. Brink noted that he purchased the property a year ago and was not aware of the grading problem. John Falkenstien, engineer on the project, referenced condition #16 concerning the driveway slope and assured that the driveway could be put in under a 20% slope. He added he did not see any- thing unusual or extreme with development of the site that mitiga- ting conditions could not take care of. Mr. Falkenstien also pointed out that Mr. Brink intended to have CC&Rs in place with the project, even though they are not required. Linda Schaff, 7585 Sombrilla, presented the Commission with a pe- tition consisting of 22 signatures stating the reasons for their opposition to the proposal (lack of privacy, drainage problems, angle of lots, increase in traffic, concern with decrease in prop- erty values) . She stated that the neighborhood wants to maintain the ruralness and openess of the land with its beauty and sur- . rounding hills. Ms. Schaff concluded by saying that whatever. spe- cial considerations are given, it is still going to change. the aesthetics of the hillside. Barbara Reiter, 10150 San Marcos, stated her opposition to the project for the following reasons: creation of two flag lots, and the proximity of building site locations. She spoke on the Plan- ning Commission' s discretion to deny the application if it is deemed inappropriate. Vince LaVorgna, 9170 Santa Barbara Road, spoke about the proposed conditions in relation to the concerns which were raised by the Commission and in public testimony. Mr . DeCamp clarified that the conditions attempt to mitigate what impacts are possible as a result of the lot split. Commissioner Bond felt that this application would result in the creation of two flag lots; the slopes on this property are too steep; certain trees may have to be cut down with this proposed site plan; and he did not feel this application meets the intent of the 20,000 square foot criteria. Commissioner Hatchell stated there are many flag lots that exist in Atascadero and pointed out that right across the street from this site there is RMF/10 zoning. Commissioner Kidwell expressed concern with the site ' s terrain being so steep, and felt that this is not the best area suited for 20,000 square foot lots. 5 • • Minutes - Planning Commission - September 1, 1987 • MOTION: Made by Commissioner Bond and seconded by Commissioner Kidwell to direct staff to bring back findings for denial for Tentative Parcel Map 27-87. Commissioner Lopez-Balbontin expressed his feelings concerning the the intent of the 20, 000 square foot land designations. Discus- sion ensued. The motion failed with the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Bond, Kidwell, and Lopez-Balbontin. _ NOES: Commissioners Hatchell, Michielssen, Copelan, and Chairman Nolan MOTION: Made by Commissioner Hatchell and seconded by Commis- sioner Copelan to approve Tentative Parcel Map 27-87 subject to the findings and conditions contained in the staff report. Commissioner Bond asked that an amendment to the motion be added that if the motion passes, that the applicant be asked to bring back a better design. Commissioner Hatchell responded that this was not the intent of the motion. The motion failed with the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Hatchell, Copelan and Chairman Nolan NOES: Commissioners Kidwell, Michielssen, Lopez-Balbon- tin, and Bond Discussion ensued concerning a redesign of the tentative map. MOTION: Made by Commissioner Michielssen and seconded by Com- missioner Bond to continue the hearing on Tentative Par- cel Map 27-8q for a sufficient amount of time in order to allow the applicant to come back with a new design for a three-way lot split for consideration by the Commission. In response to question from the Commission concerning his feel- ings about a redesign, Mr . Brink replied that he would have to confer with his engineer to see if this is possible. Mr . Falken- stien clarified his understanding of the motions and noted what possible course of action the applicant may take. Discussion ensued concerning the proper procedures for further consideration, study, appeals of the decision, etc. Commissioner Michielssen modified the motion to leave out the bringing back of a redesign and to just continue the hearing for further study on October 6, 1987. Commis- sioner Bond seconded the modification. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: 6 • i Minutes - Planning Commission - September 1, 1987 AYES: Commissioners Michielssen, Bond, Copelan, Kidwell, • and Chairman Nolan NOES: Commissioners Hatchell and Lopez-Balbontin It was the sense of the Commission that a redesign of the project might mitigate the adverse impacts. The applicant was urged to consider this option prior to the October 6th meeting. Chairman Nolan called a recess at 9:30 p.m. ; meeting reconvened at 9:38 p.m. C. PUBLIC COMMENT . Linda Schaff, who spoke on item B-5, asked for clarification on the motion for that item. D. INDIVIDUAL ACTION AND/OR DETERMINATION) 1. Planning Commission a. 11:00 p.m. adjournment objective Mr . Eng discussed the possibility of adoptin in the Commis- sion' s B Laws an adjournment objective ich would limit the beginning o new items after 11: 00 p.m. D ' cussion ensued. It was the Commi ion' s general consensus tha this might be appro- priate to requi e a Commission vote to ntinue meetings beyond 11:00 p.m. ; Mr. en stated he would bringing back the By-Laws for upgrading and nsideration by t Commission. Commissioner Kidwell c mented on a large letter sign on the roof of a new carpet store a the orner of Pueblo and E1 Camino Real and asked staff to look in is matter . Commissioner Kidwell expr sed oncerns with the actual intent of the 20,000 square foot is and It that a study should be under- taken as she is not c fortable wi the way some of the lots in Atascadero are be ' g divided and this criteria. Discussion ensued. Commissioner pez-Balbontin asked for an date on the three-way stop sign at he corner of Highway 41 and Sa to Ysabel (by Bank of America) . Commis oner Bond commented on the proliferation banner signs in t e City. Community Development Director Mr . Engen noted that a September 24th date has been chose to con- duct the joint City Council/Planning Commission meeting whi h in- 7 Minutes - Planning Commission - October 6, 1987 1. Tentative Parcel Map 27-87 : Request initiated by Ralph Brink (Cuesta Engineering) to allow resubdivision of two par- cels containing 1.46 acres into 3-- lots containing approxi- mately 20,000 square feet each. Subject site is located at 7565 Sombrilla Avenue; legal description being Lot 3 of Block E in Atascadero Colony (CONTINUED FROM COMMISSION MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 1, 1987) . In presenting the staff report, Mr. DeCamp reviewed the background from the previous hearing and noted that a revised map had been submitted in which each of the three lots would have frontage on Sombrilla and would allow for the development of a single family dwelling on the lower portion of each, while maintaining the ste- eper slopes in an open state. Mr . DeCamp also pointed out a 3:1 width-to-depth ratio on this tentative map which is being re- quested to be waived due to special site characteristics and cir- cumstances. Mr. DeCamp noted a modification to Condition #12 which would in- clude language for a scenic easement and would appear as a note on the final map. The reasoning for this change would be to assure that there would not be any confusion that the open space reserva- tion was any type of a dedication of open space. Discussion fol- lowed concerning other similar cases where this was used. (7:42 p.m. - Commissioner Lopez-Balbontin is now present. ) Ralph Brink, applicant, stated he considered the neighbors ' objec- tions when he revised the map. He noted that no trees would be cut down, there would not be any excessive grading, and there would not be any creation of flag lots on the site. He felt that since the map conforms to the necessary requirements, that the application should be approved; he had no objections to the condi- tions; however, he did ask for clarification of Condition #5. John Falkenstien, engineer for the applicant, spoke in support of the request. He referenced the CC&Rs which the applicant would incorporate with the project even though they are not required; and wanted to be sure that he would have the ability to bond for some of the requirements. Mr . Falkenstein responded to questions from the Commission. Alden Shiers, 7515 Sombrilla, appreciated the changes which have been incorporated within the revised map, but still doesn' t feel this request is compatible with the neighborhood. He spoke about the narrowness of the street with regard to the increase in traf- fic which will result and was opposed to the increase in density. Linda Schaff, 7585 Sombrilla, referenced three letters she had from adjacent neighbors (Ellen Columbo, Belva Little and Charles and Nancy Buck) citing their reasons for opposing this project. Mrs. Schaff reiterated her concerns from the last hearing noting how the neighborhood character would be changed with this divi- sion; the increase in traffic; and the lack of privacy the new homes would create. 2 0 0 Minutes - Planning Commission - October 6, 1987 Mr. Falkenstien addressed concerns raised by the previous. speakers. Additional comments in opposition were addressed by Mr . Shiers and Mrs. Schaff. Mr. Brink stated he had listened to the neighbors' concerns but emphasized that this project is in confomance with the existing General Plan and Zoning Ordinance regulations. Commissioner Bond stated he was opposed to the first map design, but felt the revised map complied with the necessary criteria. He suggested that the word "existing" be added before the " . . . . . . . 950 foot contour line. . . . " in Condition # 12. MOTION: Made by Commissioner Bond, seconded by Commissioner Hatchell and carried 6 :0 on a roll call vote to approve Tentative Parcel Map 27-87 subject to the findings and conditions contained in the staff report, with modifica- tion to Condition #12 as follows: "12. The area of the site located above the existing 950 foot contour line as shown on the revised ten- tative map dated September 24, 1987 shall be placed . in a scenic easement wherein no building construc- tion or placement shall occur. Said scenic -ease- ment and building restrictions shall be shown and noted on the final map. Tentative Parcel Map 25-87: Request initiated by Don Messer/North Coast gineering to a ow subdivision of 6. 7 acres into four pa els of 1. 6, 1.3, 1. 7, nd 2.1 acres each. Subject site i located at 5805 Capist o Avenue; legal descriptio being Parcel 1 of PM 17-06 in A scadero Colony. (CONTIN FROM COMMISSION MEET- ING OF SEPTE 1, 1987) . (APPLI NT IS SUBMITTING A RE- VISED MAP - THIS M WILL BE HEDULED AT A LATER DATE) . Mr. DeCamp noted that the ap is t has met with staff which has resulted in an agreement that evised map will be submitted at a later date which particular rela to the phasing of the pro- ject. He recommended t t the matte be continued to an indefi- nite date. There was no publi testimony given. MOTION: Made y Commissioner Hatchell , seconded by mmissioner K ' well and carried unanimously ' to continue a hearing n Tentative Parcel Map 25-87 to a future date. Tentative Parcel Ma 21-87 : Request initiated by Tom Gouff (Dan Stewart) to resubdivide x 3 klf-tlNr AC; ;•,�pA • M E M O R A N D U M TO:' City Council October 27, 1987 VIA: Michael Shelton, City Manager FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director Ax— SUBJECT: Acceptance of Final Parcel Map 18-87 : 8255 Graves Creek Road (Dave Pollard/Cuesta Engineering) BACKGROUND/RECOMMENDATION: On June 23, 1987 , the City Council approved Tentative Parcel Map 18- 87. Recommend acceptance of the Final Parcel Map, as all Conditions of Approval have been met. HE:ph Encl: Parcel Map 18-87 • EXA i 6 t i 6 CITY OF ATASCADERO a.h4-'A4Ja, PAWCa, I CAD . COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Map DEPARTMENT i TPM 15-87 Ilia tw It . , � Y N Z�y•i� V diu L �i N '�SaO_�"l —_moi uu • •„ � r 3 7,3 E4� __ •Ro..x �. �/ erpr i,� iN_I __.._ —= — - '—ROAO4— iLREEK ' _ I/ara[it eLv itw.m a+o) 1 T �N3AGTIDA z 6 ITIEM • MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Through: Michael Shelton, City Manager W,:A , From: Paul M. Sensibaugh, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Subject : Revise of Rotunda Rental Policy Date : October 19, 1987 Recommendation: Staff recommends that Council approve . Resolution that will place the rental responsibilities and fee collection in the Department of Public Works instead of the Parks and Recreation Department and which will correct the fee to be charged. Backround: The policy for the above was established this summer and was set •up on such a basis that administrative changes could be made after feedback was given from renters . Only one rental was made—that for a Doll Show. Marge Mackey coordinated the show and made helpful notes for improvements to the system The first observation was that not all of the Lounge facilities worked and that the fee charged was not as she had remembered in the Council discussions . (The plumbing, etc . has been scheduled for corrections and the fee is addressed in the attached resolution—from $50 to $35 . ) The second observation was that the custodian on hand should assist in the set up and take down for the renter. That idea will be on trial during the next rental as long as the renter does the majority of the work. Discussion: The attached resolution essentially takes the Rotunda rental from the Recreation fee resolution and forms a seperate resolution. This will provide a one stop service to the people and will allow for a smoother internal procedure when assigning hired help . Fiscal Impact : No appreciable change . RESOLUTION NO. 112-87 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ESTABLISHING RULES , REGULATIONS AND FEES FOR THE USE OF THE 4TH FLOOR OF THE ATASCADERO ADMINISTRATION BUILDING THIS RESOLUTION TO SUPERCEDE RESOLUTION NO, 46-87 WHEREAS, City Council has determined that the Rotunda Room shall be made available for use by private individuals and groups ; and WHEREAS, it is appropriate to establish fees and regulations for the use of City facilities . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Council of the City of Atascadero does hereby adopt the attached Fees and Regulations for the use of the Fourth Floor of the City Administration Building. On motion by Councilperson and seconded by Councilperson the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety by the following roll call vote : AYES • NOES : ABSENT : ADOPTED: CITY OF ATASCADERO BARBARA NORRIS, Mayor ATTEST : BOYD C SHARITZ, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: JEFFREY G JORGENSEN City Attorney . APPROVED AS TO CONTENT : PAUL IM. SENSIBAUGH---� -- ! 0 • RULE,,c AND REGULATIONS^� IONa FOR THE USE OF THE FOURTH FLOOR OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO ADMINISTRATION BUILDING All persons or groups requesting to use this City facility must first obtain a permit for that use from the City of Atascadero Department of Public Works , hereinafter called "City" . By accepting said permit , that person or group, hereinafter called "Permittee" , agrees to faithfully comply with the following terms and conditions : 1 . Permittee will have the right to use those areas , between those times and for the rate shown on the City permit . City is under no obligation to allow the use of additional areas to Permittee, nor, unless previously arranged, provide Permittee with the exclusive use of the subject building. A cleaning and damage deposit may be required. Such deposits shall be payable at the same time as the fees provided herein . Appropriate refund shall be made after inspection and corrective adtion, if required, has been taken . Refunds will be processed within thirty (30) days . There will be no refund of fees for a cancellation less than thirty (30) days from date of function . However , a refund may be made by the City if the building, or reserved area thereof, is rented to another party for the previously reserved but cancelled time . 2 . All reservations for the use of the subject building shall be made and confirmed through the : DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS CITY OF ATASCADERO 5500 PALMA AVENUE P.O. BOX 747 ATASCADERO, CA 92423 Reservations must be paid for at least thirty (30) days in advance at the Department of Public Works . In the event that conflicting requests for facility use are made by two or more parties , priority shall be determined on the basis of full payment of fee first received. The number of advance reservations by any particular individual , group , or organization may be limited when such is in the public interest . All functions taking place within the subject building shall cease by 12 : 00 midnight except by prior approval . i 3 . Permittee may be held personally responsible and accountable for the condition of the building and actions of attendees , whether invited or not , and for any damage caused by attendees , during Permittee' s function . If Permittee is a group or organization , a single person must be named as the responsible party for that groups ' or organizations' function . All minors , entering subject building as a result of Permittee' s use shall be kept under direct and immediate supervision and control by Permittee . 4 . Permittee hereby agrees to defend, indemnify and save harmless the City and its officers , agents and employees , in any and every way from any and all manner of damages , charges , suits and expenses which they may sustain or be put to by reason of Permittee' s occupancy or use of subject building, or any activity carried on by Permittee in connection therewith, 5 . Rates for the use of subject building as set by the City Council shall be available for inspection at the offices of the Department of Public Works .rks . City Council reserves the right to modify those rates and/or demand -. deposits , based on Permittee' s proposed use . 6 . City shall provide a Building Attendant , during Permittee' s occupancy of subject building, to assist in Permittee' s use of the Building. Building Attendant will lock and unlock subject . building . Permittee will not be given a key . Building Attendant is not responsible for the collection of fees or returning of deposits paid. Building Attendant will not be responsible for setting up tables or chairs , moving furniture or equipment , or cleaning up after Permittee' s function . Set-up and Clean-up is the responsibility of the Permittee. 7 . Permittee shall have the right to inspect subject building prior to function in the company of Building Attendant and submit to same a list of deficiencies for which Permittee does not wish to be held accountable . Failure by Permittee to request said inspection shall , in itself , constitute an acknowledgement that the subject building is in good condition . Any deficiencies or damage , which are in evidence upon completion of Permittee' s function , and for which Permittee may reasonably be held accountable, shall become Permittee' s responsibility . Permittee shall have the right ,. at the end of Permittees ' function , to re-inspect subject building in the company of Building Attendant , to discuss specific deficiencies and damages , if any , for which Permittee will be held accountable . 0 0 8 . Permittee shall leave subject building in as clean and neat a condition as was received, subject to the discretion of the Building Attendant . Said condition will include, but is not limited to the following: A. Proper storing of all tables , chairs , etc . B. Replacement of any furniture moved or relocated C . Removal of all trash and garbage to proper container as directed by Building Attendant . D. Cleaning of all kitchen equipment and utensils used if any . City does not guarantee the fact that said kitchen equipment and utensils are sanitary and clean prior to use . It will be the responsibility of Permittee to inspect said equipment prior to use . E. Sweeping and/or vacuuming of all floors . Floors need not be mopped or cleaned by Permittee except in the case of excessive use . Permittee shall be held responsible for any cleaning or excessive cleaning resulting from use . Permitttee shall allow ample time for cleaning of the building during the hours it is reserved. Permittee will be charged by the hour for any holding over of time beyond the time reserved, whether for continuing the function or for cleaning, at the current rate approved by the City Council . Should Permittee wish to return after the function is complete for the purpose of cleaning, arrangements should be made at the time of reservation to avoid conflict with another function . Should Permittee fail to return to clean subject building within the time allowed, City reserves the right to clean said space and bill Permittee for actual costs . Said cleaning by City will be based on the current rate of labor plus overhead and supplies . 9 . City reserves the right to re-assign areas used, if necessary , to provide for the maximum use of the building. 10 . City reserves the right , at City' s sole discretion, to require that property damage and liability insurance naming City as insured, be provided by Permittee, at Permittee' s sole cost and expense, at such limits as set by the City Insurance Manager . li . Exhibits and decorations must be approved by the Building Attendant prior to installation . At no time may Permittee nail , staple , tape or glue decorations to ceiling, walls , painted surfaces , fabrics , or floors . All decorations must be flame proof in accordance with local fire regulations . Permission to place signs on the exterior of the building must be obtained in advance from the Building Attendant . 0 0 12 . City reserves the right , through its Building Attendant to • regulate the use of equipment , devices , or activities which Building Attendant deems unsafe or which may constitute a hazard to Permittee or other user of premises , including but not limited to : A. Keeping access ways free of obstructions . B. The covering or bridging of exposed wiring, piping or conduit used for supplying electrical service . Thermostats and fuses shall not be tampered with . In the event of any difficulties with thermostats or fuses , Permittee shall immediately notify Building Attendant . Licensee shall not remove equipment or furnishings from the building. Permittee acknowledges liability for the destruction or removal of equipment and furnishings during the period of Permittee' s use of the premises . Regalia and paraphernalia of organizations shall be kept in a neat and orderly manner . 13 . The sale or consumption of alcoholic beverages is hereby prohibited. 14 . Permittee shall bear full responsibility for obtaining any and all permits and clearances necessary to hold the proposed function, including, but not limited to, the following: A. Health Permit - when offering food for sale . B. City permit for dances , concerts and other applicable functions , C . Fire Marshal clearance D. Liability Insurance naming City as additional insured. Proof of receipt of proper clearances must be received by the Department of Parks and Recreation at least thirty (30) days prior to function . Any requirements for inspections , security officers or Fire Marshal shall be at the sole responsibility of the Permittee . Permittee shall determine if a City Business License is required for function and apply for said license, if required at the City Community Development Department. Permittee shall provide the Department of Public Works with a copy of license prior to the date of the function . 15 . At any large gatherings , Permittee may be required to provide , at no cost to the City , a Deputy Fire Marshal to assure compliance with local fire safety ordinances At no time shall Permittee allow function to exceed posted room occupancy levels without a waiver from the Fire Marshal . 0 0 Permittee acknowledges responsibility for complete security in the subject building during Permittee' s occupancy . At any function in which the Permittee conducts a public dance, or any dance where teenagers are in attendance, Permittee shall provide, at no cost to the City , adequate security protection . Said protection shall include, but shall not be limited to , at least two uniformed peace officers in attendance at and during the entire duration of any said activity . 16 . Permittee agrees and promises that it will comply with and observe all applicable statutes , ordinances , rules and regulations , of the Federal , State , Municipal County or other public authority . 17 . Violation of any of the rules contained herein by Permittee shall be sufficient cause for the City to terminate existing license and refuse any future requests for a permit and shall further be sufficient cause to deny Permittee any future use of the facilities . 18 . Nothing contained in these rules shall be deemed or construed in any way to create an interest in real property or in the facility of the Permittee, not to limit the City' s authority to exercise any right or power concerning the utilization of the • building. Every use of the building shall be subordinate to the City' s use during times of election, national or local emergency , or at any other time when , pursuant to law, such use of the building is required. 19 . City reserves the right to make and Permittee agrees to abide by such rules and regulations , which from time to time, shall be necessary to protect the subject building, or the health , safety or welfare of its users . 20. All users including both private and governmental users of the Fourth Floor Rotunda will pay the standard rates approved by the City Council with the following exceptions : A.City Council , Planning Commission,approved advisory councils , ad hoc committees and special district boards are not required to pay fees . 22 . A Use Permit may be negotiated and issued to a Permittee in the case of heavy use over a period of several months . Said Use Permit to be approved by City Council . 23 . Any exceptions to fees beyond those stated should be . requested in writing and submitted to the, Director of Public ":Works . The Director will accept or reject each request on a case by case basis . Decisions of Director may be appealed to the City Council . FEE SCHEDULE (addition) -QLTR TH_ELOQR_=_ADMINISTRATION BUILDING Kitchen Group Cost A No Charge ALL OTHERS $10 . 00 (8 hours) Lounge (Club Room) Group Cost A No Charge ALL OTHERS $35 . 00 (8 hours) Rotunda Room Group Cost A No Charge ALL OTHERS $130 . 00 (8 hours) * *Use over 8 hours shall be ;15 . 00/hour Deposit Deposit shall be $21-100 . 00 per use i 1,-7E7:;N AGMDA2 Com.T _..1012718ZT EAE� /T M E M O R A N D U M TO: City Council Members FROM: Mike Shelton tia SUBJECT: Request by Hospice for Use of City Tree DATE: October 27, 1987 Recommendation City Council authorize the use of a juniper tree, located near the fountain in the Sunken Gardens -- for Hospice "Light of Life" Celebration. Discussion For planning purposes, Hospice desires to secure permission from the City to utilize a City tree for their "Light of Life" Cele- bration planned for December . At a later time, Hospice will be requesting additional support in the form of a proclamation. Attached communication from Shirley Summers more fully explains the event and requested use of a City tree. Hospice's request is the same as authorized by Council in 1986. Fiscal Impact No cost would be incurred by the City for this event. Should the City wish to provide electricity at. no cost, staff should be so directed. Attachment MEET,NG AGENDA D TE • i9/S7 To : [_ichael Shelton Atascadero City 'tanager, Baiabara Norris Atascadero City Mayor, and _iembers of the Atascadero City Council Fro,.:: Shirley Suim ers Subject : Hospice Light up a Life Campaign Shirley ','oore and I are once again chairing the Atascadero' portion of the rHospice fundraiser entitled Light up a Life. This is the second annual campaign for Atascadero. : • School Choir) , an ecurenical address, the lighting of the tree , and refreshi,ents Ve are hoping to be able to once main coordinate the events so that ceremonies will be conducted sii!ultaneously in i.any of the cities within the county. Lf you will recall, last year conduit and electrical wiring were installed providing electricity to the Juniper in the center of the Sun-,en Gardens. 'JIe would ii >e to request the use of the same Juniper for this year' s cerer,ony• i understand that the City Trees will be lit on Dece_ ber 2, whichis the night before our Gere.Tony. 'Ie would li'>e authorization to turn the City lights off during the rospice ceremony. That would constitute approximately one hour between 6 :30 and 7:30 0-, on the • nivht of Dec. 3. The ceremony will once again be conducted on the steps going into the 'Veterans '`emori.al Euildin g. `:"'e will need to have access to electrical outlets, and be sure the ,pillar lights are operational. 'r`;e will once again be serving refreshments, and would li'_-�e to utilize trze space in the r;useu:_-i, as was done in 1 86. ur basic request is ti_at you _a_=e available to osj:ice the sa- e resources that were :-:ade available in 1966. '--", he City "ouncil t<.at ti .e decided to donate t_e electricity necessary to __Ee_� t_ e -as_pice _=ee lit �0= ii E .. ;1T't. Of eCE:TiJEr• ;e tloul li fe -vou to ..:a'�e that sa::e decision for 1 '> 7. Than'_ you for your consideration, and cooperation. If you have any questions y-,lease call : '_I irley Su__ ers 4---1923 .Shirley :'Dore L,.66-1661 _io s )i c e 544-2266 Your 27'rul;r Shi rle- Sul-, e MEED i-a3 `Nr)A DA AA _ • M E M O R A N D U M TO: City Council October 27, 1987 VIA: Michael Shelton,. City Manager FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Acceptance of Final Parcel Map 33-86 LOCATION: 3980 El Camino Real APPLICANT: Kmart Corporation (Lars Anderson and Associates) BACKGROUND/RECOMMENDATION: • On January 12, 1987, the City council approved Tentative- Parcel Map 33-86 , subject to certain conditions and in concurrence with the recommendation of the Planning Commission. The required conditions have been complied with and the final map is recom- mended for approval. HE:ps cc: Kmart Corporation Lars Anderson & Associates • T t'M 33- 86 � �s• v.noc�cvi. - Joe —Mci D I rj • ^ ' A ® ate•f ® _J j� /.. "a j ° $ N ! ( �W =t! U . �!V fa2VSE�/Y�0 RL1cip i 6 s s B. B. �VF • MEMORANDUA TO: City Council October 27, 1987 VIA: Michael Shelton, City Manager FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director--a SUBJECT: Appeal by Janet Thompquist of the Planning Commission' s de- nial of Conditional Use Permit 5-87 to allow a private ele- mentary school for 32 students on a 2.07 acre site at 9148 Palomar. BACKGROUND: At their regular meeting of October 6 , 1987 the Planning Commission voted 5 :1 to deny the above-referenced Conditional Use Permit. There wasconsiderable discussion regarding traffic and safety issues, and several neighbors spoke in opposition to the project. • RECOMMENDATION: Uphold the Planning Commission' s denial of Conditional Use Permit 5-87 to establish a private Elementary School by concurring in their Find- ings for Denial. ALTERNATIVE: The October 6 , 1987 staff report contains findings for approval and conditions of approvel for the use for one year. HE:ph Enclosures: Letter of Appeal - October 9 , 1987 Findings for Denial - October 20, 1987 Staff Report - October 6 , 1987 Planning Commission Minutes Excerpt - October 6, 1987 Neighborhood Letters cc: Janet Thompquist • RECEIVED Qu i - + � Santa Lucia School • P. 0. Box 927 Atascadero, CA 93423 October 9, 1987 Atascadero City Council P. 0. Box 747 Atascadero, CA 93423 RE: Conditional Use Permit 5-87 Dear Council Members, I appeal the decision of the Atascadero Planning Commission to deny Conditional Use Permit 5-87 for Santa Lucia School.. I believe the Council should reverse the decision of the Planning Commission and approve this permit for the following reasons: 1. Traffic safety, the main concern of neighbors opposing this permit, was addressed by the Planning Department and the Public Works Department. Their analysis is that even maximum traffic that could be generated from this project would be within the safe capacity of all roads providing access to the project. Their findings are based on fact. 2. There is no eveidence that our offer to carpool, thus reducing traffic further, was given the slightest consideration. 3. People involved in this project are child oriented. The safety and well-being of all children, those attending the school as well as those living in the neighborhood, is our top priority. We will be safety conscious, thcuahtful neighbors. 4. The project site has been historically used as a school . Our maximum enrollment of 32 would be 2/3 of the previous enrollment. We would operate 4 instead of 5 days per week. 5. The permit would expire in one year. The permit would be re-evaluated at that time. 6. The service we offer is desired and would benefit the community as a whole. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, y 0-0 Janet Thompquist Director • i EXHIBIT I - Findings for Denial Conditional Jse Permit 5-87 Santa Lucia School October 20, 1987 FINDINGS: 1. The proposed use would be a regional facility located within a local neighborhood and is not consistent with the General Plan land use designation of the site and policies; and 2. The establishment and subsequent operation and conduct of the the use could, because of the circumstances, be detrimental to the health, safety and welfare of the general public and persons re- siding in the neighborhood of the use; and 3. The proposed use will be inconsistent with the character of the immediate neighborhood; and 4. The proposed use will generate a volume of traffic beyond the safe . capacity of roads providing access to the project and beyond the normal traffic volumes of the surrounding neighborhood that would result from full development in accordance with the Land Use Ele- ment. i • CITY OF ATASCADERO Item: B,5 STAFF REPORT FOR: Planning Commission Meeting Date: Oct. 6,1987 BY: Joel Moses, Associate Planner File No: CUP 5-87 SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit to establish a private Elementary School (kindergarten to sixth grade) for a maximum of 32 students. BACKGROUND: In 1981 the City of Atascadero approved Conditional Use Permit U:810203; 1 for Steve and Jeanne Salayon to allow for the establishment of a Day Care/Pre-school on the site. The approval limited the number of children on the site to 20. An appeal of the approval was made by two of the neighbors to the City Council. The appeal was denied, an additional condition was added to the approval requiring the reduction of the number of animals on the site to levels approved by the Zoning Ordinance. In 1982 the City of Atascadero reviewed and approved Conditional is Permit U: 821020; 1 requested by the Salayons. The Use Permit requested the expansion of the allowed number of children on the site from 20 to 48 children. The expansion was approved. The Salayons have sold the property and the use has been discontinued for more than 6 months. In being closed for more than 6 months, the use has lost its approval status for the Day Care/Pre-School use. The proposed use of the site would thus require the approval of a Conditional Use Permit to establish the use. The use would be categorized the same as the previous use as a "school". A. SITUATION AND FACTS: 1. Applicant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Santa Lucia School 2. Representative. .. . . . . . . . . . . . .Susan Cook 3. Project Address. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9148 Palomar Road 4. Legal Description. . . . . . . . . . . .Lot 1,Block 10 Atas. Col. 5. Site Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2. 07 acres 0 s Conditional Use Permit 5-87 Oct. 6,1987 • Page 2 6. Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .RSF-Y (Residential Single Family) 1 ac. minimum lot size with sewer : 1 1/2 ac. minimum lot size without sewer. 7. General Plan Designation. . . . .Moderate Density Single Family, outside of the Urban Service Line 8. Existing Use. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Single Family Residence 9. Environmental Status. . . . . . . . .Negative Declaration posted September 22, 1987 B. ANALYSIS: The zoning Ordinance allows for the establishment of a school within the RSF (Residential Single- Family) Zone subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit and development standards (Sec. 9-3. 153b & Sec. 9-6. 125 Exhibit G) . The approval would be subject to the required findings listed in the Zoning Ordinance for CUP' s (Sec. 9-2. 109) . These six findings cover standard areas • of concern and potential impacts caused by a proposed use. The findings require that the use or project conform to the General Plan, the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance, and the established City Policy and Criteria. In reviewing the project, the use conforms to these requirements. The use meets the required parking standards and location standards set by the ordinance. The proposed use conforms to the General Plan Land Use designation for the site and the Policies concerning the site. Two additional findings are standard findings noting that the use would not be inconsistent with the surrounding neighborhood and would not, during the operation of the use, be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare. The site has previously been used for a "School" and has operated without dramatic impact on the neighborhood. The site and other "schools" have operated within residential neighborhoods without detrimentally affecting the neighborhoods, or the general public. The proposed school while smaller is a regional facility and sound planning would encourage a location on a collector road and not in the middle of a residential neighborhood. The final required finding address the question of traffic generation from the site or use. The finding requires "that the • • Conditional Use Permit 5-87 Oct. 6, 1987 Page 3 . use or project not generate a volume of traffic beyond the safe capacity of all roads providing access to the project. . . or beyond the normal traffic volume of the surrounding neighborhood that would result from full development in accordance with the Land Use Element" . In reviewing the project's traffic generation, the staff reviewed the project with the Public Works Department. It was noted that the proposed use would generate approximately 70-80 trips per day. This would be a reduction from the previous Day Care/Preschool use that would have generated traffic in the area of 120-130 trips per day. It was also noted that the use would generate different peak hour demands. The previous use would have peak arrivals and departures that coincided with the peak morning and evening hours, where the proposed use would be off hour (8: 30am & 3:30pm) . The access roads were noted as being able to accommodate the proposed traffic. The applicant has noted in a letter to the neighbors the use of carpooling (Exhibit H) that would reduce any potential traffic impacts. The proposal should be encouraged but the enforcing of any condition would be difficult at best. The applicant has stated that the proposed use would be temporary. Relocation would occur in about one year, (after June 1988) . The staff notes that the use of the site would and should be addressed as a permanent use not as a temporary use. • The applicants are seeking to build a new school building outside the City. The problem is that the site is fully developed with a structure that has been previously developed and approved by the City for the use as a school. Comments were received from outside agencies. Comments noted the need for the structure to conform to all Building and Safety Code regulations, and State permit procedures. Also noted was a concern from the Fire Department over the name of the school. The possibility exists of confusing the school' s name (Santa Lucia School) with a location on Santa Lucia Road, rather than its actual site on Palomar. C. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the approval of Conditional Use Permit CUP:5-87 based on the Findings in Exhibit I and the Conditions of Approval in Exhibit J. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A - Location Map Exhibit B - Site Plan Exhibit C Floor Plan Exhibit D - Site Photos Exhibit E - Site Photos 40 . 5-87 ' • Palomar SchoolSanta Lucia (CO \ \ - ' �` •' �. INS .- ►. SII \ Fir VNI ft-Ift MY re 03 K MA 1 ��� • • Conditional Use Permit 5-87 Oct. 6, 1987 Page 4 Exhibit F - Supplemental Development Statement Exhibit G - Zoning Ordinance Sections Exhibit H - Applicants Letter Exhibit I - Findings Exhibit J - Conditions of Approval JM/jm CI EXHIBIT B SITE PLAN ��; .... :.. . TY OF ATASCADERO 1197" CUP 5-87 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 9148 Palomar DEPARTMENT Santa Lucia School (Cook) �o �Ft? ,q n � w m • T b • � m n i k •b •* P t' S o t ~ 'A m C A • n `' M 2 nri a A j ;: II S - I 1 0 -< 3 � < b N p n d O O C t 1 W C `� = V, Co e c � • • m • r = 163.20 FEET O EXHIBIT C FLOOR PLAN CITY OF AraSCADERO BI I r -,� 1979-7 CUP 5-87 4 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 9148 Palomar DEPARTMENT Santa Lucia School (C ) ff V❑O�! Y t � . a 3 e > o O�O s I -- of > 0 N J�J r n - i I m0 O r II z N r Q l , • a v } �:ap)Rr24 y"� �'�n-.:��e�.�• �Ysr�!- � ��n!_+tea 1�� � �'{i T ,�k�C,O;kd`� �� �F Aj Z'` ^�Lr•� 1. .`• - �+s F- ® .... '-'r ", "'-i �,':h '' �T" A4 Al-M.0 -7t.� �/".�� •fes"v ..`: }'k y "aa4A_. �\ .yP9�.e.1����,�,. � t��`t •� a •i _, - S r - ' CITY OF EXHIBIT F DEVELOP14ENT ST r� - �� ATASCADERO psi,, Ie . ' 1977-7 CUP 5-87 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 9148 Palomar DEPARTMENT Santa Lucia School (Cook) SUPPLEMENTAL DEVELOPMENT STATEMENT - SANTA LUCIA SCHOOL The Santa Lucia School is a private, non-profit elementary school sponsored by the Unitarian Universalist Fellowship of. San Luis Obispo County. The school proposes to lease the site at 9148 Palomar Ave. for the 1987-1988 school year to accomodate a projected enrollment of 32 students, grades K through 6. The school will operate between the hours of 8:30am and 2:30pm, Monday through Thursday, with childcare available before and after school hours. The school will employ two accredited teachers and two teachers aides, plus an art teacher one day per week. The parents and teachers will carpool daily. The site has been .used historically as a day care center/preschool, licensed for 48 children in December, 1982. Originally a single family residence, the property was converted for use as a preschool in 1981, after receiving its conditional use permit March 16. The school remained operational until April of 1986. • The Santa Lucia School is in the process of obtaining its Countv Land Use Permit for a site in "Templeton which was purchased earlier this year. Due to delays in receiving approvals and the expected time for building permits and remodeling, the school does not anticipate occupancy until 1988. Therefore, our request is for a Conditional Use Permit at 9148 Palomar Ave. for a 12 month period, beginning in th Pall of 1987. • EXHIBIT G Zoning Ord CIT Y OF ATASCADERO CUP 5-87 9148 Palomar CA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Santa Lucia School O ZZQ DEPARTMENT Schools: An institution or establishment that provides a program of instruction and teaching services. Includes: preschools, nursery schools and day care centers; elementary and secondary schools serving grades K through 12 (or portions thereof) ; junior colleges, colleges and uni- versities; and similar education institutions. Does not include Sun- day schools which are permitted under "Churches and Related Facilities. " 9-6 .125 . Schools and Preschools. The provisions of this Section apply to preschools and public and private schools providing instruc- tion for preschool through 12th grade children; business and vocation- al schools; and to preschools and other facilities including indivi- dual homes where day-care services are provided to more than six chil- dren. (a) Elementary and High Schools. (1) Location. No closer than 1 , 000 feet to CS, CPK, IP and I Zones or 500 feet from a CR Zone. (2) Parking. Off-street parking is to be provided at a ratio of two spaces for each classroom, and one space for 100 square feet of administrative or clerical office space. Except that where Section 9-4 . 114 (Parking) would require more spaces for an on-site auditorium, stadium, gymnasium or other public or sports assembly facility, the larger number of spaces is to be provided. • .; � CIT EXHIBIT H Applicants let aR; Y OF ATASCADERO 'r loinrim.' --, CUP 5-87 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 9148 Palomar DEPARTMENT Santa Lucia School (Cook) Santa Lucia School P .O. Box 927 Atascadero, Ca. 93423 September 26, 1987 Re: Conditional Use Permit, 9148 Palomar, Atascadero, Ca. Dear Neighbor, We have recently applied to the City of Atascadero to use 9148 Palomar (previously Dove Hill School, 48 students) as a temporary site for a private, non-profit school . We would like to provide you with information regarding this project. 1. Our request is for a maximum of 32 students, ages 5-10 years of age. 2. The Use Permit will be temporary, extending through June, 1988 . 3. The school will be in operation four days per week. In keeping with the residential nature of the area, children will be carpooled to and from the site. The project is scheduled to be heard before the Atascadero Planning Commission on October C . If you have any questions, please contact us prior to the hearing. Sincerely, Sue Cook - 461-0507 Jan Thompquist - 239-0814 • ! EXHIBIT I - FINDINGS Conditional Use Permit 5-87 9148 Palomar Road Santa Lucia School / Cook 1.The proposed project or use is consistent with the General Plan land use designation of the site and policies ; and 2.The proposed project or use satisfies all applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance ; and 3.The establishment,and subsequent operation or conduct of the use will not,because of the circumstances and conditions applied in the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety or welfare of the general public or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the use, or be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity of the use; and 4.That the proposed use will not be inconsistent with the character of the immediate neighborhood or contrary to its orderly development; and 5.That the proposed use will not generate a volume of traffic beyond the safe capacity of all roads providing access to the project, either existing or to be improved in conjunction with the project, or beyond the normal traffic volumes of the surrounding neighborhood that would result from the full development in accordance with the Land Use Element; and 6.That the proposed project is in compliance with any pertinent City policy or criteria adopted by ordinance or resolution of the City Council. The project is in compliance with the City' s Design Review Manual guidelines. JM/jm • • EXHIBIT - J - Conditions of Approval • Conditional Use Permit 5-87 9148 Palomar Road Santa Lucia School/Cook 1 .All construction shall be in conformance with Exhibit I Conditions of Approval) and Exhibit B (Site Plan) and other applicable codes and ordinances of the City of Atascadero. 2 . Prior to the establishment of the use the applicant shall obtain all local and state approvals and permits. 3.Prior to the establishment of the use the applicant shall have the site reviewed for conformance to all applicable building and safety codes of the City of Atascadero. This shall include a building compliance survey and the corrections of all items noted in the survey. 4.This Conditional Use Permit approval shall expire one year from the date of final approval, unless a time extension- has been granted pursuant to a written request received prior to the expiration date and Planning Commission approval through a Public Hearing process. JM m • 0 Minut - Planning Commission - October 6, 1987 MOTION: Ma a by Commissioner Hatchell and conded by Commis- sion Bond to approve "Ale Avenue" as a street name to sery Tract 1489 (9240 At scadero Avenue) and to in- terpret t t Condition 7 allow bonding to satisfy the improvement r ireme provided that no building permit be finaled until road improvements are completed. The motion carri 4: with a roll call vote: AYES: Com ' ssioners Hatche Bond, Copelan and Chairman lan S: Commissioners Lopez-Balbontin and 'dwell airman Nolan called a recess at 8 :35 p.m. ; meeting recon ed at at 8:42 p.m. 5. Conditional Use Permit 5-87 : Request initiated by Santa Lucia School (Susan Cook) to es- tablish a private elementary school for 32 students on a 2.07 acre site. Subject site is located at 9148 Palomar ; legal description being Lot 1, Block 10 in Atascadero Colony. At this point, Steve DeCamp excused himself from the proceedings due to a possible conflict of interest. Chairman Nolan noted that the Planning Commission has received several letters from adjacent neighbors opposing the project. Mr. Moses presented the staff report recommending approval of the request. He pointed out that the use is a temporary one as the applicants are planning to relocate their facilities in Templeton by 1988. It was also noted that the Fire Department had indicated a concern with the name of the school (Santa Lucia School) in re- lation to Santa Lucia Road. Mr. Moses then responded to questions from the Commission. Sue Cook, applicant and coordinator of the school, spoke in sup- port of the request and noted that the use of this site was tem- porary in nature. She stated the school has purchased a location in Templeton in which they hop to be able to locate in 1988 and indicated that the adjacent neighbors were contacted concerning this application. She addressed Condition #5 concerning the name of the school and noted that a constant contact with the Fire De- partment could help mitigate their concern with the name of the school. Neil New, 9141 Palomar , commented on the 20 letters with 35 signa- tures from people opposed to the use permit. He spoke about the previous approvals with the preschool and noted his opposition to the request. 5 • • Minutes - Planning Commission - October 6, 1987 Larry Dubrul, owner of the subject site, stated he had run a pre- school until excessive insurance rates forced him to close the school. He did not think there would be a problem with the name of the school. Linda Smith, 7955 Valle, noted her opposition to the project as she did not feel the traffic increase would benefit the neighbor- hood. Richard Louder, 7955 Castano, spoke in opposition to the project. He felt that the findings were abitrary in nature and that insuf- ficient data was given to adequately address the full impacts this type of project would have on the neighborhood and talked about the possible need for an E.I.R. Mildred Peresig, 9101 Palomar, expressed her opposition to the project citing the roads being too narrow, the high number of speeding cars on the street, etc. Chuck Smith, 7955 Valle, clarified that Palomar is very steep where the site is located and noted that many people use Valle as a primary access through to Curbaril. He felt cautionary signs should be posted along the road. Jan Tompquist, Director of Santa Lucia School, addressed some of. the concerns expressed by the neighbors and emphasized that safety of the children is their highest priority. She indicated her wil- lingness to post safety signs and noted that a great deal of car- pooling would take place with the students. She asked the Commis- sion that the project be judged not on speculation of what could happen but what the Commission has before them. There was discussion among the Commission concerning adequate no- tification to the neighbors on this hearing, traffic and safety issues in the area, etc. MOTION: Made by Commissioner Bond and seconded by Commissioner Copelan to deny Conditional Use Permit 5-87 . The motion carried 5: 1 with a roll call vote: AYES : Commissioners Bond, Copelan, Lopez-Balbontin, Copelan, and Nolan NOES : Commissioner Hatchell C. PUBLIC COMMENT Ther was no comment this time. D. INDIVIDUAL C N AND/OR DETERMINATION: 1. Pl ning Com"', o ' ssion Community Development Director City of Atascadero In response to the proposed Santa Lucia School. we would like to add some of our own thoughts regarding the potential impact in the surrounding area. We feel very strongly about the increased traffic flow that would inevitably result with the operation of the school. As was pointed out in the other letter. the streets that would be effected are not well-marked and have no sidewalks. As it is right now. we feel discouraged from taking our 2 year old daughter out .for walks since it has been our experience that most drivers tend to drive too fast and are not looking for pedestrians. This. coupled with the fact that the - roads are narrow and winding to begin with, makes the Castano. Palomar. and Valle streets very dangerous for pedestrian traffic. Still. what one must keep in mind is that this is a residential area and there. are many families with children that play in the streets. We're very concerned that it Just a matter of time- before there is an accident that will involve a vehicle and a child. . The additional traffic flow from the proposed school. in our opinion,. is unacceptable for the safety and very nature of the area that we live in. Thank you for your time and consideration. Duane and Ingrid Inclish 7685 Castano St. Atascadero. Ca. 466-8376 Octob91 1987 To : Community Development Director City of Atascadero RE : Proposed Santa Lucia School/ Negative Impact on Palomar Avenue Dear Sir : I have lived on Palomar Avenue since February of 1982 . I have witnessed a dramatic change in traffic pattern since the closing of the preschool located at 9148 Palomar Avenue . We no longer have to contend with hurried parents dropping off their children in the mornings and afternoons . It has been a welcome relief for those of us that use Palomar for residential related use . For instance , whether Ehey should or not , neigh- borhood children do play in and adjoining the roadway . This is particularly true of the 8900 block of Palomar . Furthermore , the children MUST use the roadside in the mornings and after- noons to come and go to the city school bus stop on Palomar near El Camino Real . I personally u•se the roadside for daily morning walks . As it is , I can easily hear and avoid approach- ing traffic even if I cannot yet see. the vehicle . Where the road is narrow with steep banks , even now this can be challeng- ing . In the case of such increased traffic as the proposed 32 student school would certainly create , I feel that the road side would no longer be safe for walking . I know of at least four other people who use the road for a daily walking regimen who would be adversely affected by the new use . I do not feel that we should be forced to give up our safe use of the road to satisfy the interest of Ms . Cook .' Should any one of my neighbors be harmed as a result of their legal pedestrian use of Palomar Ave . by the staff or clientel of the proposed Santa Lucia School , it is my opinion that the City of Atascadero would be , to some extent , respons- ible for allowing the hazardous traffic copdition =to be cre= ated . Please do not create this situation in my neighborhood . Thank you for your time , Linda Gf'one Smith 9031 Palomar Ave . FbR01C1'�LY LIf-I)D t C KCfJr PL4K\kC/' _WF Community Development Director City of Atascadero Re.: Proposed Santa Lucia School (9148 Palomar Ave. ) We the undersigned object to the reopening of a school at 9148 Palomar for the following reasons: l.. The experience of the daycare/preschool here proved that the main impact was increased traffic. Although the daycare/preschool was authorized 48 children, there were in fact no more than 20. 32 students- will be a 60% increase. Considering that each parent could make 2 trips past our home each morning and 2 trips each enening we could experience 128 additional vehicles per d'ay. 2. Palomar, Castano, and Valle are winding, relatively narrow roads without sidewaalks. Dangerous conditions already exist for small children who play in the streets daily.. 3. The site is on septic tank rand unless it is inspecte& often would have a negative environmentaai impact as did the daycar /preschool. 4. The previous= approval for the daycare/ppeschool did not adequate address the traffic problem and affected residents were not not ' Signed Le--; ti 1 1 Address : �(l 'S 66---a—trl7vc' i Community Development Director City of Atascadero: Re.: Proposed Santa Lucia School (9148 Palomar Ave. ) We the undersigned object to the reopening of a school at 9148 Palomar for the following reasons : l.. The experience of the daycare/preschool here proved that the main impact was increased traffic. Although the daycare/preschool was authorized 48 children, there were in fact no more than 20. 32 students- will be a 60% increase. Considering that eazh parent could make 2 trips past our home each morning and 2 trips each enening we could experience 128 additional vehicles per d'ayr 2.. Palomar, Castano, and Valle are winding, relatively narrow roads without sidewazlks. Dangerous conditions already exist for small children who play in the streets daily.. 3. The site is on septic tank and unless it is inspected'. aften would have a negative environmentadi impact as- did the daycare?/Ereschool. . 4. The previous- approval for the daycare/ppeechool did not adequately address the traffic problem and- affected residents were not notified. Signed Address: Community Development Director City of Atascadero Re.: Proposed Santa Lucia School (9148 Palomar Ave. ) We the undersigned object to the reopening of a school at 9148 Palomar for the following reasons : l.. The experience of the daycare/preschool here proved that the main impact was increased traffic. Although the daycare/preschool was authorized 48 children, there were in fact no more than 20. 32 students- will be a 50% increase. Considering that each parent could make 2 trips past our home each morning and 2 trips each enening we could experience 128 additional vehicles per d'a.y.. - 2, Palomar, Castano, and Valle are winding, relatively narrow roads without sidewailks. Dangerous conditions already exist for small children who play in the streets daily.. 3. The site is on septic tank rand unless it is inspected often would have a negative environmentad5 impact as did the d•aycare?/reschool. 4. The previous- approval for the daycare/ppeechool did not adequately address the traffic problem and' a-ffected residents were not notified-. -- Signed ✓ Address Community Development Director City of Atascadero Re.: Proposed Santa Lucia School (9148 Palomar Ave. ) We the undersigned object to the reopening of a school at 9148 Palomar for the following reasons : l.. The experience of the daycare/preschool here proved that the main impact was increased traffic. Although the daycare/preschool was authorized 48 children, there were in fact no more than 20. 32 students- will be a 50% increase. Considering that eamh parent could make 2 trips past our home each morning and 2 trips each enening we could experience 128 additional vehicles per d-a.y.- 2- Palomar, Castano , and Valle are winding, relatively narrow roads without sidewalks. Dangerous conditions already exist for small children who play in the streets daily.. j. The site is on septic tank rand unless it is inspected? o-ften would have a negative environmentadi impact as did the d-aycarwpreschool. 4. The previous approval for the daycare/ppeechool did not adequately address the traffic problem and' affected residents were not notified'. _ Signed ,.� Address Community Development Director City of Atascadero v • Re.: Proposed Santa Lucia School (9148 Palomar Ave. ) We the undersigned object to the reopening of a school at 9148 Palomar for the following reasons : l.. The experience of the daycare/preschool here proved that the main impact was increased traffic. Although the daycare/preschool was authorized 48 children, there were in fact no more than 20. 32 students- will be a 50% increase. Considering that each parent could make 2 trips past our home each morning and 2 trips each enening we could experience 128 additional vehicles per db y. 2.. Palomar, Castano, and Valle are winding, relatively narrow roads without sidewailks. Dangerous conditions already exist for small children who play in the streets daily.. 3. The site is on septic tank rand unless it is inspectedi often would have a negative environmentadi impact as did the daycare?/preschool. 4. The previous- approval for the daycare/ppeechool did not adequately address the traffic problem and affected residents were not notified-. Signed Address Community Development Director . City of Atascadero y Re : Proposed Santa Lucia School (9148 Palomar Ave. ) We the undersigned object to the reopening of a school at 9148 Palomar for the following reasons : 1.. The experience of the daycare/preschool here proved that the main impact was increased traffic. Although the daycare/preschool was authorized 48 children, there were in fact no more than 20. 32 students- will be a 50% increase. Considering that each parent could make 2 trips past our home each morning and 2 trips each enening we could experience 128 additional vehicles per d'a.yr 2.. Palomar, Castano, and Valle are winding, relatively narrow roads without sidewmlks. Dangerous conditions already exist for small children who play in the streets daily.. 3. The site is on septic tank rand unless it is inspected-4 often would have a negative environmentaa) impact as did the daycare?/preschool. 4. The previous, approval for the daycare/preschool did' not adequately address the traffic problem and affected residents were not notified. Signed : Address : 7�6 aS Community Development Director City of Atascadero Re : Proposed Santa Lucia School (9148 Palomar Ave. ) We the undersigned object to the reopening of a school at 9148 Palomar for the following reasons : 1.- The experience of the daycare/preschool here proved that the main impact was increased traffic. Although the daycare/preschool was authorized 48 children, there were in fact no more than 20. 32 students- will be a 60% increase. Considering that eazh parent could make 2 trips past our home each morning and 2 trips each enening we could experience 128 additional vehicles per d-ay, 2, Palomar, Castano, and Valle are winding, relatively narrow roads without sidewgiks. Dangerous conditions already exist for small children who play in the streets daily.. 3. The site is on septic tank :and unless it is inspected? o,ften would have a negative environmental impact as did the daycare-/preschool. 4. The preeiou�- approval for the daycare/ppeschool did not adequate address the traffic problem and' affected residents were not notified. Signed: T v Address: Community Development Director City of Atascadero Re : Proposed Santa Lucia School (9148 Palomar Ave. ) We the undersigned object to the reopening of a school at 9148 Palomar for the following reasons : 1.. The experience of the daycare/preschool here- proved that the main impact was increased traffic. Although the daycare/preschool was authorized 48 children, there were in fact no more than 20. 32 students- will be a 60% increase. Considering that eaxh parent could make 2 trips past our home each morning and 2 trips each enening we could experience 128 additional vehicles per d'ay._ 2.. Palomar, Castano, and Valle are winding, relatively narrow roads without sideweal.ks. Dangerous conditions already exist for small children who play in the streets daily.. 3. The site is on septic tank ,and unless it is inspected? often would have a negative environmentaa5 impact as did the daycare?/mreschool. 4. The previous approval for the daycare/ppeschool did not adequately address the traffic problem and: affected residents were not notified. Signed 9 � I Address: l/c i Community Development Director City of Atascadero• Re.: Proposed Santa Lucia School (9148 Palomar Ave. ) We the undersigned object to the reopening of a school at 9148 Palomar for the following reasons : l.. The experience of the daycare/preschool here proved that the main impact was increased traffic. Although the daycare/preschool was authorized 48 children, there were in fact no more than 20. 32 students- will be a 60% increase. Considering that eaxh parent could make 2 trips past our home each morning and 2 trips each enening we could experience 128 additional vehicles per d'ay.. 2.. Palomar, Castano, and Valle are winding, relatively narrow roads without sidewmIks. Dangerous conditions already exist for small children who play in the streets daily.. 3. The site is on septic tank and unless it is inspected? often would have a negative environmental impact as- did the daycare:/vreschool. 4. The previous= approval for the daycare/ppeschool did not adequate address the traffic problem and- affected residents were not notified. Signed: Address: v i Community Development Director City of Atascadero- Re : Proposed Santa- Lucia School (9148 Palomar Ave. ) We the undersigned object to the reopening of a school at 9148 Palomar for the following reasons : l.. The experience of the daycare/preschool here proved that the main impact was increased traffic. Although the daycare/preschool was authorized 48 children, there were in fact no more than 20. 32 students- will be a 60% increase. Considering that eaxh parent could make 2 trips past our home each morning and- 2 trips each enening we could experience 128 additional vehicles per d'ay. 2. Palomar, Castano, and Valle are winding, relatively narrow roads without sidewEpIks. Dangerous conditions already exist for small children who play in the streets daily.. 3. The site is on septic tankjand unless it is inspectediaften would have a negative environmental impact as did the daycarer/areschool. • 4. The previous; approval for the daycare/ppeschool did not adequately address the traffic problem and' affec ed residents were not notified. Signed Address : Community Development Director City of Atascadero-. Re.: Proposed Santa Lucia School (9148 Palomar Ave. ) We the undersigned object to the reopening of a school at 9148 Palomar for the following reasons: 1.. The experience of the daycare/preschool here- proved that the main impact was increased traffic. Although the daycare/preschool was authorized 48 children, there were in fact no more than 20. 32 students- will be a 60% increase. Considering that each parent could make 2 trips past our home each morning and- 2 trips each enening we could experience 128 additional vehicles per day.. 2.. Palomar, Castano, and Valle are winding, relatively narrow roads without sidewealks. Dangerous conditions already exist for small children who play in the streets daily.. 3. The site is on septic tank rand unless it is inspected? often would have a negative environmentaa5 impact as did the daycara-/vreschool. 4. The preriouT- approval for the daycare/ppeachool did not adequate address the traffic problem and- affected residents were not notified. ` (/w / Sign Address: Community Development Director City of Atascadero. Re:: Proposed Santa Lucia School (9148 Palomar Ave. ) We the undersigned object to the reopening of a school at 9148 Palomar for the following reasons: 1.. The experience of the daycare/preschool here proved that the main impact was increased traffic. Although the daycare/preschool was authorized 48 children, there were in fact no more than 20. 32 students will be a 60°x6 increase. Considering that eazh parent could make 2 trips past our home each morning and- 2 trips each enening we could experience 128 additional vehicles per day, 2« Palomar, Castano, and Valle are winding, relatively narrow roads without sidewaalks. Dangerous conditions already exist for small children who play in the streets daily.. 3. The site is on septic tank -and unless it is inspectedIaften would have a negative environmental impact as- did the daycare-/vreschool. 4. The previous- approval for the daycare/ppeechool did not adequately address the traffic problem and affected residents were not notified. Signed ^ ' -L-d-IL2 Address: �- Community Development Director City of Atascadero Re: Proposed Santa Lucia School (9148 Palomar Ave. ) We the undersigned object to the reopening of a school at 9148 Palomar for the following reasons : 1.. The experience of the daycare/preschool here proved that the main impact was increased traffic. Although the daycare/preschool was authorized 48 children, there were in fact no more than 20. 32 students- will be a 60% increase. Considering that each parent could make 2 trips past our home each morning and 2 trips each enening we could experience 128 additional vehicles per d'ay- 2.. Palomar, Castano, and Valle are winding, relatively narrow roads without sidewalks. Dangerous conditions already exist for small children who play in the streets daily.. 3. The site is on septic tank and unless it is inspectedIl often would have a negative environmentaa) impact as did the daycare-/preschool. 4. The previous' approval for the daycare/ppeschool did not adequate address the traffic problem and affected residents were not notified. Signed Address : Community Development Director City of Atascadero. Re.: Proposed Santa Lucia School (9148 Palomar Ave. ) We the undersigned object to the reopening of a school at 9148 Palomar for the following reasons: 1, The experience of the daycare/preschool here proved that the main impact was increased traffic. Although the daycare/preschool was authorized 48 children, there were in fact no more than 20. 32 students- will be a 606 increase. Considering that eaxh parent could make 2 trips past our home each morning and 2 trips each enening we could experience 128 additional vehicles per d'ay,. 2. Palomar, Castano, 'and Valle are winding, relatively narrow roads without sidewgllks. Dangerous conditions already exist for small children who play in the streets daily.. 3. The site is on septic tank and unless it is inspectedlaften would have a negative environmentaai impact as- did the daycare/preschool. 4. The previouszapproval for the daycare/ppeechool did not adequately address the traffic problem and affected residents were not notified. Signed Address:— q Community Development Director City of Atascadero Re.: Proposed Santa Lucia School (9148 Palomar Ave. ) We the undersigned object to the reopening of a school at 9148 Palomar for the Iollowing reasons: l.- The experience of the daycare/preschool here proved that the main impact was increased traffic. Although the daycare/preschool was authorized 48 children, there were in fact no more than 20. 32 students- will be a 60% increase. Considering that each parent could make 2 trips past our home each morning and 2 trips each enening we could experience 128 additional vehicles per db.yf 2. Palomar, Castano, and Valle are winding, relatively narrow roads without sidewaalks. Dangerous conditions already exist for small children who play in the streets daily.. 3. The site is on septic tank and unless it is inspectedioften would have a negative environmentadi impact as did the daycar Ee/vreschool. 4. The previous- approval for the daycare/ppeechool did not adequate address the traffic problem and affected residents were not notified. Signed :—_ l�/ i�I � Address : , • Community Development Director City of Atascadero Re: Proposed Santa Lucia School (9148 Palomar Ave. ) We the undersigned object to the reopening of a school at 9148 Palomar for the following reasons: 1.. The experience of the daycare/preschool here- proved that the main impact was increased traffic. Although the daycare/preschool was authorized 48 children, there were in fact no more than 20. 32 students- will be a 60Yo increase. Considering that each parent could make 2 trips past our home each morning and 2 trips each enening we could experience 128 additional vehicles per day.. 2« Palomar, Castano, and Valle are winding, relatively narrow roads without sidew4ks. Dangerous conditions already exist for small children who play in the streets daily.. 3. The site is on septic tank and unless it is inspectedioften would have a negative environmental impact as did the daycarw-greschool. 4. The previous approval for the daycare/preschool did not adequately address the traffic problem and- affected residents were not notified. Signe Address: Lill Community Development Director City of Atascadero Re_: Proposed Santa Lucia School (9148 Palomar Ave. ) M We the undersigned object to the reopening of a school at 9148 Palomar for the following reasons : -- l.. The experience of the daycare/preschool here proved that the main impact was increased traffic. Although the daycare/preschool was authorized 48 children, there were in fact no more than 20. 32 students- will be a 60% increase. Considering that eamh parent could make 2 trips past our home each morning and 2 trips each enening we could experience 128 additional vehicles per d'a.y.. 2.. Palomar, Castano, and Valle are winding, relatively narrow roads without sidewaclks. Dangerous conditions already exist for small children who play in the streets daily.. 3. The site is on septic tankrand unless it is inspected-i often would have a negative environmentadi impact as did the daycarL- , eschool. 4. The previous• approval for the daycare/ppeechool did not adequately address the traffic aroblem and' affected residents were not notified. Signed Address '973 y MEETING J AGNDA DAT�C� Z�/ ITEM —Z • MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Through: Michael Shelton, City Manager From: Pau M. Sensibaugh, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Subject : Public Hearing—Boundary Resolution—Undergrounding Project Date : October 19, 1987 Recommendation: The Undergrounding Advisory Committee recommends that public input be taken regarding the proposed boundary but that the resolution not be considered until the November 23 Council meeting. Backround: The above committee has recommended the attached boundary subject to modifications along West Mall from Olmeda to Atascadero Creek. A Public hearing is required since the owners will have to make new connections to their private facilities . There will be a BIA general meeting on November 18, the agenda for which will include the Undergrounding project. Another Public Hearing and potential passage of the final resolution is anticipated on November 23. Atached is the proposed time table presented earlier which anticipates this Public Hearing right on schedule . Discussion: The project will pay for the entire Public improvements and the first 100 feet of the service lines . In the case of the downtown area which is proposed, no properties are expected to require more than the alloted footage . Therefore, there will be no assessments and thus a Protest hearing is not necessary. Since, however, some property owners may face connection costs greater than the amount of their Perceived benefit, they will have the opportunity to give input on at least three ocassions. • The boundary generally runs from E1 Camino Real to Olmeda and • from Atascadero Creek to just west of Traffic Way. PG&E is checking the cost of including the West Mall portion from Olmeda to Atascadero Creek. Besides beautification of the downtown the project is significant due to the safety aspects of underground utilities versus overhead utilities . Furthermore, when the tree program is realized in the BIA area future conflicts with overhead wires will not be an issue . Fiscal Impact : The project will be supported by the Rule 20—A PG&E . Undergrounding funds which to 1990 will amount to about $730,000 for Atascadero. All private reconnection costs will be the burden of the property owner. s • RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO ESTABLISHING THE BOUNDARIES FOR UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING DISTRICT NO. 2 BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Atascadero as follows : WHEREAS, a public hearing was called for October 27th . 1987, at the hour of 7 : 30 p .m. or later in the Council Chambers in the City Hall , Atascadero, California , to ascertain whether the public necessity, health, safety or welfare required the removal of poles , overhead wires and associated overhead structures , and the underground installation of wires and facilities for supplying electric , communication or similar or associated service, within that certain area of the City described as : The southerly boundary is El Camino Real , from the westerly side of Atascadero Creek, to the west lot lire of Lot 19 Block 323 (Coast to Coast Hardware Store) . The westerly boundary extends northerly along Lot 19 to Palma Street , then easterly 100 feet and then northerly, along the rear lot lines of all parcels fronting on Traffic Way to Olmeda Avenue. The northerly boundary will include Parcels 3 and 17 of Block 253, fronting on Olmeda Avenue, thence northerly along Traffic Way to the rear property line of the Armory property . The easterly boundary is the easterly property line of the Armory, continuing southerly to Olmeda Avenue thence easterly 450 feet to the easterly side of West Mail then southerly to the northerly side of Lewis Avenue , then easterly to the westerly boundary of Atascadero Creek and then continuing southerly to the starting point , the southerly side of El Camino Real , westerly of Atascadero Creek; and WHEREAS, notice of such hearing was given to all affected property owners as shown on the last equalized assessment roll and to all affected utilities , in the manner and for the- time required by law; and WHEREAS, such hearing was duly held, and all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard. WHEREAS , the Council determined after hearinn_ on the sub;ect that the Underground Utility District herein created is in the general public interest for the following reasons (s) : (1) The City of Atascadero wants to improve the image and appearance of the city by placing all overhead utilities (for electricity , telephone and cable TV) underground in various highly visible land use zones . (2) The city' s Underground Utilities Coordinating Committee has recommended conversion to underground utilities in the area described above . (3) The area mentioned above passes through a civic is area . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council and the City of Atascadero that , pursuant to. Ordinance No . 153 of the City of Atascadero, the above described area is hereby declared an Underground Utility District , and is designated as Underground Utility District No . 2 of the City of Atascadero . Attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A" , and hereby incorporated as a part of this resolution , is a map delineating the boundaries of said District : RESOLVED, FURTHER, that the Council does hereby fix September 1 , 1988 as the date on which affected property owners must be ready to receive underground service , and does hereby order the removal of all poles , overhead wires and associated overhead structures and the underground installation of wires and facilities for supplying electric , communication or similar or associated service within Underground Utility District No . 2 on or before March 1 , 1989 . RESOLVED, FURTHER, that the utility which undertakes underground installation of its facilities shall use the underground conversion allocation computed pursuant to decisions of the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California for the purpose of providing to each premises in Underground "Utility District No .. 2 requiring it a maximum of one hundred feet of individual electric service trenching and conductor (as well as backfill , paving and conduit , if required) . Each other serving utility will provide service trenching and conductor in accordance with its tariffs on file with the California Public Utilities Commission or as required by its Franchise Agreement with the City . Each property owner in Underground Utility District No . 2 shall be responsible for the installation and maintenance of the conduit and termination box located on, under or within any structure on the premises served. RESOLVED, FURTHER, that the City Clerk is hereby instructed to notify all affected utilities and all persons owning real property within Underground Utility District No , 2 of the adoption of this resolution within ten (10) days after the date of such adoption . Said City Clerk ! • shall further notify said property owners of the necessity that , if they or any person occupying such property desire to continue to receive electric , communication or other similar or associated service , they or such occupant shall , by the date fixed in this resolution , provide all necessary facility changes on their premises so as to receive such service from the lines of the supplying utility or Utilities at a new location , subject to applicable rules , regulations and tariffs of the respective utility or utilities on file with the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California . Such notification shall be made by mailing a copy of this resolution together with a copy of said Ordinance No . 153 to affected property owners as such are shown on the last equalized assessment roll and to the affected utilities On motion by Councilmember _ and seconded by Councilmember , the Atascadero City Council hereby adopts the foregoing resolution in its entirety on the following roll call vote: AYES : NOES : ABSENT : ADOPTED: ���S4(4 ATTEST : y�(b a1n CITY OF AT ASCAI,E'RG BOYD C . SHARITZ ARBARA NORRIS City Clerk : ,� i j 14A-i ayor APPROVED AS To VLM Q3C.� F'PROVED AS TO CONTENT JEFFREY G. JCR *� J4J _ PAUL M. City Attorney Dir . of Public Works City Engineer APPROVED APPROVED PACIFIC GAS ETECTRIC CO. P _CIFIC BELL BY : BY : 1872QQ 3/84 (loo ) .RULE 20-A PROJECT MAJOR STEPS TO INITIATE AND COMPLETE A PROJECT SCHEDULE COMPLETION 1. Establish priority list of proposed projects for governmental agency January 15, 1987 January 15, 19, 2. Identify project and establish rough cost - compare to allocation April 14, 1987 April 14, 1987 3 . Define job limits (contact other utilities) Ma�12, 1987 May 12,. 1987 4 . Obtain company and city or county staff concurrence May 192 1987 May 19, 1987 5. Establish preliminary cost prepare drawings - Locally determine R/W requirements determine street light costs review with other utilities August 1, 1987 6. Division review and approval of p plan reliminary September 15, '87 7. Submit to city council or board of supervisors September 22, '87 for concurrence Determine customer costs October 5, 1987 _ 9 . Preliminary hearing with property owners and/ or public hearing October 13, 1987 10. Establish boundary, construction dates, and enact resolution October 27, 1987 11. Submit final estimate advance GM for material and R/W critical material obtain R/W January 1, 1988 Division and GO approval of GM 12 . Assign Project Construction Coordinator January 1, 1988 13 . Prepare specs and bid drawings January 15, 1988 . 14 . Obtain bids - Receive t February 15,1988 15. Prepare contracts February 15,1988 16. Contractor start and complete work March 1, 1988 1� PGandE completes underground work May 15, 1988 1 8• Follow up to comply with resolution dates May 24, 1988 (contd on reverse side) f SCHEDULE COMPLETION 19. Energize underground system June 1, 1988 20. Convert services to underground September 1, 18g 21. Remove overhead facilities March 1989 22. Follow up to close out GM costs March 1, 1989 r. ot EDA AVF d� 3 - , .'Sy �.��� ` r i�f.�!^:_�::����.•__mob- _ -. /�i+ ay .. .. j Y fefs Y. M i, �Vltlh s �= ,S' .-anrs iss.. ?7wi7C� i•" � _ � w�3�3 t LEWis C •- � fiats- ,aJ� a,. d1t S.f C •/�/°-' :"_a • �.� ,v1 ..J\ apALM4.`t r `• 3 i•/ � � .c„r .. MJI y • I • Q • :••::. ' �•+ � S)� ��i •F 31 � �'-:i ivw..0 � r •� �� •ice::;{ � ", .. .� • ':.:.,� .-tJ/ + AVE. _'• - .. ii4.��\ � �0�� j�aref-�iei + ~. i r�a�rw.:•.. • a• y • �� _ - 5p rr j >>� �•'• AVE. 19 µ;� .... i.,swvwvy 4AL 114A +x "e 33 PIP, rr b ee v {;) ' �` J,,1C+�}Q .` j0 , '+f`y •i`L,J1Vw•., t, v• � ^ ,. mora" ++... � S's J•s S I • ` •J ' ,'1 ✓.t.F.rf�'r .rr�, ��sr�;,� / �. 1 .,,�, C/1,,,�uV p ��(Cvllr..1/t-(Z lJ . . . - flj>0 St-D A (7.G n+I O C h7.Ysr.�C O k ,. COAST W.LLGYS DIVISION • od Lru� to 8E R<w . -�1i71d s._;T.E`��,.oR i=ti rT�i.io�f.. o•Ja-'� , ' ��+}'��y x�-S+E3^����ry✓ryl.,?rfp�,,�,wc„,(-,1•a, �^ -�;M. i _(` t -:i,NY.. �i��� F,,I, '"'C a�c,������� �-�. � �. }A-�'"t,1� [�+•p r �7t r L� �f ,erg, _ ! s j•� -�(y £ V I� (� z .x.V` 'Ac�l:4k�',,,�y S: r.' twit i• .}'.a 7 - P/l��:Y?5+�4.4.>:�i�-�..K•s'c}"rf`1. .P.-'C�.ct�'.:. FYr!�`_��.4�v:'ii.l+alr :-•x.t��5� a+-�-'.�.:�^ a••` `•.* /�• `! �f 'a-r�c� QO u !n V `�.�- !"-' p L L g O _+'3\ 1 . >'.. !•'.1N.' i�.;.. 2 * ,� 1 ' , I CC v u q p 00—i l'c-f`_.n S = �i•-`f'�+,c 1"• N C c °' E v = © � �.'• �., +t e .. NW1nf- 2 q Y q N E q — n'e'e ^C> w �n r►` �[ ! � jr•,' nd. .._ Yp °)-o C7.-!^ c. c vEo a q` G t %• ay.�. ,.tri �J� .� c e o! e % •a.. N O Y s N u .. �` off e. e�= E E t�1�'Xft� � os_ o00of ra ' o �_•c sn oo. . ttgoo in 1Lr000UUU QF•QQQ WWW -°�Lt- LL. �7Qt7 f 44 Fc1 r J; L•- 4 .y ;;: ..r".-• I 191 < n.i hia _ au i r Y W = r Q f.v va.rbsr'� t 44' tt�-ils�'• . �� FF ltit fid{ ;'<r vS. Y �T:' r.f-1 i+.41a•sr���'i Nil nam�;�,,.+%:•�,,2'ti-;;��r.(j' '•t 1.4..:7 .'�e �':� .. :. --.... -:. ,..::. . • £ -. �,pct«�'+'�,�';��L ' 1 - ,_t•yew :rte•-3.. ,. 0 t• s ny i _ V i n •�F R _ I i" , X c.. t• :U.t 2{. -,yam , ki't '�.f A D, > lY {4 \. V .: ) "�,s�. �-•,,,, j+moi. � r a i �.• 5 01 • M E M O R A N D U M TO: City Council October 27, 1987 VIA: Michael Shelton, City Manager FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director W SUBJECT: Zone Change 11-87 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. 158 (8485 E1 Corte: City of Atascadero) BACKGROUND/RECOMMENDATION: This Ordinance had first reading approval on September 13, 1987. Recommend approval of Ordinance No. 158, second reading. HE:ph • Enclosure: Ordinance No. 158 II ORDINANCE NO. 158 • AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO AMENDING SECTION MAP NUMBER 19 OF THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAPS OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY AT 8485 EL CORTE FROM RMF-4 (PD6) (RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY (PD6) ) TO RSF-Z (RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY, 1. 5 - 2. 5 ACRE MINIMUM) (ZONE CHANGE 11-87 : 8485 EL CORTE) WHEREAS, the proposed zoning map amendment is consistent with the General Plan as required by Section 65860 of the California Government Code; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendment is in conformance with Section 65800 et seq. of the California Government. Code concerning zoning reg- ulations; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendment will not have a significant ad- verse impact upon the environment. The Negative Declaration prepared for the project is adequate; and WHEREAS, the Atascadero Planning Commission held a public hearing1w on September 1, 1987 and has recommended approval of Zone Change 11-87. NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Atascadero does ordain as follows: Section 1. Council Findings. 1. The proposal is compatible with the surrounding land use and zoning. 2. The proposal is consistent with the General Plan. 3. The proposal will not result in any significant adverse en- vironmental impacts. The Negative Declaration prepared for the project is adequate. Section 2. Zoning Map. Map Number 19 of the Official Zoning Maps of the City of Atasca- dero on file in the City Community Development Department is hereby amended to reclassify the area shown on the attached Exhibit "A"" from RMF-4 (PD6) (Residential Multiple Family) to RSF-Z (Residential Single Family, 1. 5 - 2. 5 acre minimum) . 1 Ordinance No. 158 Section 3. Publication. The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published once within fifteen (15) days after its passage in the Atascadero News, a newspaper of general circulation, printed, published, and circulated in the City in accordance with Section 36933 of the Government Code; shall certify the adopting and posting of this ordinance and shall cause this ordinance and this certification together with proof of posting to be entered into the Book of Ordinances of this City. Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall go into effect and be in full force and ef- fect at 12:01 a.m. on the 31st day after its passage. On motion by Councilmember Mackey and seconded by Councilmember Bourbeau , the motion was approved by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Bourbeau, Handshy, Borgeson, Mackey & Mayor Norris NOES: None ABSENT: None DATE ADOPTED: October 13, 1987 By: BARBARA NORRIS, Mayor City of Atascadero, California ATTEST: BOYD C. SHARITZ, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: MICHAEL SHELTON, City Manager AOV AS 0 FORM: rR F G. J GE EN, City Attorney ARE B J\Aw_ - HENRY ENGE Communityvelopme- Director 2 0 EXU r Bi-r A qtr 15 CITY OF ATASCADERO oYd ►Har+ -a8 197 —7 SCAD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Z,o, GtiaK9� ( , — DEPARTMENT •.yam "�/ S►� ��4 E " IvE \ I I Lis It z; gw F-.4 (PD G) 4-0 m 4V / �J \ • SPD / ?RS F Qak Q` o °9. S Y/t F� IBJ C NT�O a\��i�\ • ���e►" JI e a O PN a � V C°/ \ 4^ CT R MEETING ' AGENDA • M E M O R A N D U M TO: City Council October 27, 1987 VIA: Michael Shelton, City Manager FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Zone Change 12-87 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. 161 (8750 E1 Camino Real: Sandra L. Genzone). BACKGROUND/RECOMMENDATION: This Ordinance had first reading approval on October 13 , 1987 . Rec- ommend approval of Ordinance No. 161, second reading. HE:ph Enclosure: Ordinance No. 161 • ORDINANCE NO. 161 • AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO AMENDING SECTION MAP NUMBER 19 OF OFFICIAL ZONING MAPS OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY AT 8750 EL CAMINO REAL FROM IP (INDUSTRIAL PARK) TO CS (COMMERCIAL SERVICE) (ZC 12-87 : GENZONE) WHEREAS, the proposed zoning map amendment is consistent with the General Plan as required by Section 65860 of the California Government Code; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendment is in conformance with Section 65800 et seq. of the California Government Code concerning zoning reg- ulations; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendment will not have a significant ad- verse impact upon the environment. The Negative Declaration prepared for the project is adequate; and WHEREAS, the Atascadero Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 15, 1987 and has recommended approval of Zone Change 12-87. NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Atascadero does ordain as follows: Section 1. Council Findings. 1. The proposal is compatible with the surrounding land use and zoning. 2. The proposal is consistent with the General Plan land use element and other elements contained in the General Plan, and specifically, policies pertaining to the "wavy line" concept expressed in the General Plan land use element. 3. The proposal will not result in any significant adverse en- vironmental impacts. The Negative Declaration prepared for the project is adequate. Section 2. Zoning Map. Map Number 19 of the Official Zoning Maps of the City of Atasca- dero on file in the City Community Development Department is hereby amended to reclassify Portion of Lot 3 of Block 7 of the Atascadero Colony as shown on attached Exhibit "A" which is hereby made a part of this ordinance by reference. ORDINANCE NO. 161 • • Section 3. Publication. The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published once within fifteen (15) days after its passage in the Atascadero News, a newspaper of general circulation, printed, published, and circulated in the City in accordance with Section 36933 of the Government Code; shall certify the adopting and posting of this ordinance and shall cause this ordinance and this certification together with proof of posting to be entered into the Book of Ordinances of this City. Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall go into effect and be in full force and ef- fect at 12:01 a.m. on the 31st day after its passage. .On motion by and seconded by the motion was approved by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: DATE ADOPTED: By: BARBARA NORRIS, Mayor City of Atascadero, California ATTEST: BOYD C. SHARITZ, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: MICHAEL SHELTON'; City Manager A RO D AS FORM: TF F Y G GE EN, City Attorney ARED BY: HENRY ENGIN, isCommunity Development Director ° x r ..PO •O'My • •� '/�.i *f ./'L .. .MS.l.+K='Y R A p..,ay71 Y ANS"j - +� •� - t. ,+ '' : :� •air•tt t 1 c g S. r 7 .7 nT=13o•st •1Z' „/._.. A +'�' ' rid .LL +fes 1.,, ♦'� 7E, + t• : 'r' r Ytrt t I .VJ •,Jr IOIY�• •\J ��4.`` 'x .•. �r 3 t1 +y r ' .'AT•78.135 �` 1 sa �,a/ ♦•• Jy . t -}���.�\ sy, ' 'AT-79'23 12-41' •'rs f '1 6• •i J, \ ,..• :1� ++,5 s .r t j; •AT-81-185 _i.. o 'Pt 4/�♦'v •�l. t sPy•, ♦� +:.+ .:�. ` AT-81 M. 32S•8t • �d +e.�' �`�5."•• •3 J• '1.r rx J� a •' ../+ � � r :a , 1», to io ,31. 3 4 :+..•.•, + • ♦'dC w e !t S �' '. •••t" e�dt �w ♦.. . (•{ rn -2 s�Ar• +,. at•0 !i` AEVIS roll DATIL; •°, . '.:n.!V IIP ♦ J�l,♦ 'y+. e5•`t , a.c r -••y`M 4�2��"' gib" �+ SITE 8750 E1 Camino Real ir: .f :•`A "."•�,�` s\'fi a Pt`y,-"�•"� ' 0.,; „ •,�;. Zone Change IP (Industrial . - .� : .. . �. '` � 3•,-� 4•. �•,e.�� ':, Industrialf•. '. RSF�' "' •' ,�� ;�s; . `?. `• r" r-,4�- cn _ ` i.: Park) to CS (Commercial .•� ° t Service) N'Ir ••.'°. .49 e; I•2 .�� •,,.cam .1�•.r-"" r" 34 17 i t ,rf;S1 � •.G % Ir sb+ . °: $F�•.n.°� Se'S, E"' 1 '� 3 t 7 ]• 3 •� 1•f� � •Lt. � fQ1j0lt•,y$ (� t Y .. 34 10 ♦t4 r to7 Tt •ta ;.s♦q 23 t: •10•A I' t0 .$26 + •' .13 �IL yll 10 1 •fir /Gj r A'•Jp , IVE �9 :♦♦ ?I! 7n - '+,G,•. 1. • � y F. I • 2e ilt g 'b'• _ - -. - \I•• q+• 7E oa+ t S 3. .r. � sJiJ r$�3 ♦`•• • �,' . :... ...•_ ,. PDp10`6;`O So'.; ♦ _.' ! 4, 4++e :f�a�z:�r. + i,itD�--♦ Tutt �b'• •'•+ •. - t 9tt�a•` � •f. .�it'nt `t �,.iZs i •6 RSFY �, �+ 3a +,eti .� ► sjL R '• t 1 \ 't • a/ate �.�s 1196+ ar b•a� . t ~�S •. 1 •r *o .• V. .. rw�,e!➢ �+'^• •�S-p6.�r� .�.,,�.... '.d t 7/'J ...• .� - 16 C. p5/ s\. .A v .•� •Fe 6 `+�i 1 .•a ~ /�. •. JIc9 R, " ,tea<P J 4.• •n..t.. ` .�r,}i 7 ?� .... ` ' a •• 2 ,,, ,, .:,RMF/ _. •v isles-r ••A a.� .' . C •' r _ i J .k. oy', ' t S q,8 • L P �R+° yplE � .�� e,•t S,` `a`�..••'.4 ,C'� S: ,7 .•' io�t 10•• flbop CO ► R�gl� � a :f`f;r. �•1 r4•t� ip aV4;,'s1� -,�4+„ •�\` �. m •ra••••t•s. •fir .,;SIS �re�� a -is ,�} O .i 36 it 36 •a r Lz.•t••a. 3 ,•\ o .o+t '•�S s.z� R.l.{u.7y'�.MI�aa•YIH'S�r-a ft 23, • t«r�` • • SIF 22- Berri t�u...r•. It-4 w. 1•si..c:w,..a. [��` _ w4;«tu..u...4r-..s► 141:.+..i.a«:.ea+.r . «.• - -• •�• RS 2Y �,• .ual•'•rt1«+t—.r..•tr.,.•...a,ru,c,o. - ^ 20 ".;.,.�27.31JA7w:aL•i r4'a:r•rr...«trr...` -�•. .�s•s '• v � .i +',}.wu w,�.cv.•t•ua •rpo•.p 23 ,-t4 t'4� '1 CITY OF ATASCA . t W; EXHIBIT A ORD. 161 _ Fc r ,, 'fl'� �+� '•��j�l �c� ���;; ZONE CHANGE ZC.12-87 • ��'`" i I`Irl�.:�' =�►� ��'��i 8750 El Camino•Real _ IP to CS (Genzone) • M E M O R A N D U M TO: City Council October 27, 1987 VIA: Michael Shelton, City Manager FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director u� SUBJECT: Zone Change 9787: Second Reading of Ordinance No. 160 Tentative Tract Map 10-87 (6875 Tecorida: Woodglen Ltd. ) BACKGROUND: City Council considered this matter at a public hearing held on Oct- ober 13, 1987, and approved the zoning change on first reading. The tentative tract map cannot be considered until the proposed planned development rezoning is approved. For that reason, the tract map is enclosed for consideration. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: • The applicant is proposing a small lot subdivision of 1.2 acres com- prised of 3 existing lots of record to become a nine lot subdivision varying in size from 3,968. to 7,074 net square feet. RECOMMENDATION: 1. Approval of the attached Ordinance No. 160 on second reading. 2. Approval of Tentative Tract Map 10-87 subject to thirty (30) Re- vised Conditions of Approval, dated September 15, 1987 . HE:ph Enclosures: Ordinance No. 160 Revised Conditions of Approval - September 15, 1987 Staff Report - September 15, 1987 cc: Woodglen Ltd. Cuesta Engineering • ORDINANCE NO. 160 • AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO AMENDING SECTION MAP NUMBER 17 OF OFFICIAL ZONING MAPS OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY AT 6875 TECORIDA ROAD FROM RMF/16 (FH) (RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY, 16 UNITS PER ACRE WITH A FLOOD HAZARD OVERLAY) TO RMF/16 (FH) (PD-7) (RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY, 16 UNITS PER ACRE WITH A FLOOD HAZARD AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAYS) (ZC 9-87 : WOODGLEN) WHEREAS, the proposed zoning map amendment is consistent with the General Plan as required by Section 65860 of the California Government Code; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendment is in conformance with Section 65800 et seq. of the California Government Code concerning zoning reg- ulations; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendment will not have a significant ad- verse impact upon the environment. The Negative Declaration prepared for the project is adequate; and WHEREAS, the Atascadero Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 15, 1987 and has recommended approval of Zone Change • 9-87. NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Atascadero does ordain as follows: Section 1. Council Findings. 1. The proposal is compatible with the surrounding land use and zoning. 2. The proposal is consistent with the General Plan land use element and other elements contained in the General Plan. 3. The proposal will not result in any significant adverse envi- ronmental impacts, and preparation of an Environmental Impact Report is not necessary. 4. The appearance of the project is in compliance with the City's Appearance Review Manual guidelines. Section 2. Zoning Map. Map Number 17 of the Official Zoning Maps of the City of Atasca- dero on file in the City Community Development Department is hereby amended to reclassify Lots 30, 31 and 32 of Block UA of the Atascadero Colony as shown on attached Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B" which are made a part of this ordinance by reference. Ordinance No. 160 Section 3. Publication. The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published once within fifteen (15) days after its passage in the Atascadero News, a newspaper of general circulation, printed, published and circulated in this City in accordance with Government Code Section 36933 ; shall cer- tify the adoption of this ordinance; and shall cause this ordinance and certification to be entered in the Book of Ordinances of this City. Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall go into effect and be in full force and ef- fect at 12:01 a.m. on the thirty-first (31st) day after its passage. On motion by and seconded by the foregoing ordinance is hereby adopted in its en- tirety by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: DATE ADOPTED: CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA ATTEST: BARBARA NORRIS, Mayor BOYD C. SHARITZ, City Clerk • Ordinance No. 160 APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: MICHAEL SHELTON, City Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: q/A), U jqr��� rRfREJB Y G EN, City Attorney HENRY ENG Community D velopment irector CR J .r 7 t F 8 - 'a <RMF 01 dA by 7 ^^a�ccs, /�(� • yb �- • ,9. � t 5 TO ,RMF/16 ,°• ,.,� ,)•.;�y'��,.� • � ;�.� t,. �.t ,;. � Q,� ,� . "TCC �' •. � � •l,l `lc 117 '°. p� �, i l . X • .b 1.' J -It �,,, �•- .,yt� Q 6+1." sY./�`'� ,'S.(rC'- �r �'1 `•' -v. .,.,e. J + .r'°Ci: .• off/\, SITE 6875 T z . : •T 4;q ,_r <: ,�.°° ._.t;,� , ,- ,.h ,' = ecorida Road ` =a: z` -'y ZC: 9-87 RMF "LSF- a „r• 1. -' o / ( H to Y �i`'l,.°' .,; •IG . .� PD67F _ Y RMF/16 Q" a � n J ^:," m � r '� tet.• _ a• , S,° _is:1 J♦ � v eo,.., . TT - ,ry J�!�,. � O c "p la° 'y�sf•• 1}st--. • 3 `ui` t` t ,t •+�� '` .M�,• a '16 'I S tt 1j - ►.' - tY� •a- `,y s i„ •• ,•,,s° x.+1s ,iS ,,,,s.• ,.I.e•"\''► t } A . ' -,i , 'bV` ''�� t]b �xZ >,i5 1 til�� �t -� 1� 9fe �l tA,.. r�� HLQ � ' 18 CtP " a r x s a . , , �, , .. ,3,20 r ,�,ir= x. i,+ ,sss '• , /a,, d •0E ws LII s° "h a'• r �',, LSF-Y •,° :.,�� >,t: ` t, ro, ,..�./° 1 r > ,... •� - : "' `' e : .o,o , rxo ,.._ •.°° .,.fi �t 'yam (L~• ;jq/, s -'� ,•z .t.•'sso s°, ll-•, y' .,:, , ' ,r la a� `sz• >Tx° >x ss° •I% , 2z meq; xa , a AT-80'C41 -"* rb 21 4 'sssy >seo ,. •'t„ rs; • l� . z\T-7e Z�S M(Pw) LSF-Y(FH) AT-7e-:,s �:..� !/rip J M , -� ,;, � :,.�� •• — — ;r AT•78-Zi! j �\: ,23- Jo h ,>�,r-__o �„ •a,o >i Ll TRACT ;004 1ZEI 1.",I Y r 'Z 't "=r ' ,.� =53,aro LSF—Y(FH)30 —}^ r v,�tF 'sr° 4,. d al R d iA rr Y - � y\ �p/(•iL° '{ s_, �^�'i s f •�r�^�3� .,x>. _" flit �s Ipp� i LSF Yr t, x•s,r ec ,f''' " ..s , ri L,sia ,o -• '»'.e? 19 16 ' IS-A•eco _ - 7 a,,' �• ,a •ss.a 'may, f `/' 1' •rr r "4 L �f'.. /':7 X M •.%d' f Udo ,�£ 6•! ILI ,L•y'� 1 ' •�` Mir ) 'G-, Il � !im Gr l t>tl L L� �]'"�(s - 9 „Z da, •s�" , srr `r+ >°'�t.•r •\oa , S d� 0'lam "Y 27 � _ �f-L i'• •<s�'� � /�z'� B4�l`+ •K i / 954 �y; � �.4`w,a 30 . .t- - .•- t, !\ ,fr, q„T�r I.,a � /V, •' i•ty . :�'.� ,3 - •.� r,�`r \ °- �;.°`°,'..'71 6 rTa . h e ,qs 26 y5. ��. �e'° A RMF/16(FH) a „,,. 31 22 o k LR --o a f \\\� CITY °e i OF ATASCADERO Planning Department I�•-���ti ".4_j";""�f�.1 /� E Ii..I ns.,,..,p ii 1 x.�..j Yl.s aA s a wl: t u ....� 11--C.f ��'..':•.`,.....~.,`.t:�vLL.:.�:i � „ , ' EXHIBIT A x ORD. 160 y ��� Zone Change ZC:9-87 r y� Map No. 17 6875 Tecorida Road 1r0 )' Tent.Tract Map TTM: 10-87 ' r Woodglen Ltd/Cuesta �� EXHIBIT B ORD. 160 �i, .,.. :�. . , CITY OF ATASCADERO Zone Change ZC• 9-87 6875 Tecorida Road ` scan ; COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT woodglen Ltd/Cuesta . DEPARTMENT z G NA IIt z J :..iF r.{• l�jl +n I F lil I' At\ rn olicIt"o -t O I I ' • c , I B Ill! UN Art I vE � N l € F r d> g : > o C ` L, � I I li T o C co 6.10000LEH yw... f v^T I o I EXHIBIT G - Conditions of Approval Tentative Map 10-87 September 15, 1987 (REVISED) CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1 . Water shall be obtained from the Atascadero Mutual Water Company. Water lines shall be extended to the frontage of each parcel or its public utilities easement prior to the recording of the final map. 2. All existing and proposed utility, pipeline, open space, or other easement are to be shown on the final map. If there are building or other restrictions related to the easements, they shall be noted on the final map. 3. Grading, and Drainage plans , prepared by a registered Civil Engineer shall be submitted for review and approval by the Community Development and Public Works Departments prior to the issuance of any building permits or the recording of the final map. 4. Obtain encroachment permit from the city of Atascadero Public Works Department . Sign an Inspection Agreement and a curb Gutter Agreement , guaranteeing that the work will be done and the • inspections paid for, prior to the issuance of a building permit and construct improvements as directed by the encroachment by the encroachment permit prior to the final building inspection or the recording of the final map. S . A road maintenance agreement, in a form acceptable to the City Attorney, shall be recorded with the deed to each parcel at the time it is first conveyed. A note to this effect shall appear on the Final Map. 6 . Road improvement plans prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer shall be submitted to the Community Development and Public Works Departments for review and approval for the construction Tecorida Road, the subdivisions internal street (Los Arboles) and the CONSTRUCTION of IMPROVEMENTS ON San Andres or recording of the final map, or prior to the issuance of any building permit , which ever comes first . Plans shall include, but not limited to : a . Tecorida Road: Design shall conform to design of Tecorida Road being prepared in connection with proposed development at 6715 Morro Road per Precise Plan 03-87 . Plans shall include a minimum paved section of 15 ' -0" Plus City standard curb, gutter and 5 ' -0" sidewalk. Design shall include measures to save and preserve trees within the right-of-way. (SEE # 10) • b. San Andres Road: Design shall include City standard curb, gutter, 5 ' -0" sidewalk and additional paveout , width to VARY FROM 20 ' FEET TO 10 ' FEET FROM THE CENTER LINE TO THE FACE OF CURB, DESIGN TO be determined by the City Engineer. Design shall include measures to protect and preserve trees within the right-of-way. c. Subdivision' s internal street (Los Arboles) : Design shall include measures to preserve and protect existing trees on the site. 7 . Construction of the public road improvements shall be completed (or bonded for) prior to the recording of the final map. 8. All relocation and/or alteration of existing utilities shall be responsibility of the developer at his sole expense. 9 . The newly created lots shall be connected to the Public Sewer . All annexation permit fees shall be paid for the newly created IotS prior to the recording of the final map. Sewer improvement plans shall be submitted for review and approval by the Public Works Department prior to the recording of the final map. 10 . The applicant shall deposit with the Director of Public Works a dollar amount determined by the Director of Public Work, which shall be utilized for the future development of improvements for the implementation of a Routes to School Plan for Santa Rosa Elementary School (SEE # 6A) . FEES SHALL BE DEPOSITED WITH THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FOR THE LINEAR FEET OF FRONTAGE WHERE SIDEWALK IS NOT CONSTRUCTED, AT A UNIT PRICE OF $1 .50 PER SQUARE FOOT. 11 . Public Improvement plans prepared for the site shall be reviewed and approved by the Fire Department . The plans shall include two standard fire hydrants . Design and location shall be approved prior to the recording of the final map. 12 . Parcels 6 E 7 shall have no direct access to San Andres Road Parcels 1 , 9, 8 E 7 shall have no direct access on to Tecorida Road. Access shall be by way of the subdivisions internal street ( Los ArboIes ) . RELINQUISHMENT OF ACCESS RIGHTS SHALL BE DELINEATED ON THE FINAL MAP. 13. Address identification signs shall be approved as a part of the public improvement plans . the signs shall contain 4" reflective address numbers for each residential unit served by a driveway. The signs shall be located on the right hand side of the drive way and shall be so placed as not to effect the visibility of the intersection. 14 . Prior to the approval of the improvement plans by the Director of Public Works, either the Subdivider shall acquire sufficient title or interest in the off-site land to allow the improvements to be made as required by these conditions : or the City Council , upon request by and at the expense of the subdivider, shall have made all appropriate findings and adopted Resolution of Necessity as required by law ' so that the City may ! r exercise its power of Imminent Domain. 15 . Drainage Facilities shall be constructed to City of Atascadero standards. All work shall be completed or bonded for prior the final building inspection or the recording of the final map. 16 . The Subdivider shall provide drainage easements and/or drainage releases from the points of concentration of stormwater leaving the project boundary through adjoining properties to the nearest natural watercourses as approved by the Public Works Department if applicable. 17 . All lot grading and drainage improvements shall require write certification by a registered Civil Engineer that all work has been completed and is in full compliance with the approved plans. 18. All grading and erosion control measures shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and constructed in accordance with the City of Atascadero grading codes and standards . Prior to the final building inspection, said engineer shall submit to the City written certification that grading is in conformance with said codes and standards , including all Flood Hazard Overlay Zone • requirements. 19 . The subdivider shall install all street signs , traffic delineation devices, warning and regulatory signs, guardrails, barricades , and other similar devices were required by the Director of Public Works. Signs shall be in conformance with the Department of Public works standards and the current State of California uniform sign chart . Installation of traffic devices shall be subject to review and modifications after construction. 20 . Offer of dedication to the City of Atascadero the following rights-of-Way and or easements : Street Name : Tecorida Road Limits : 20 ' -0" along westerly edge of property frontage adjacent to Tecorida Road. Minimum Width: 40 ' -0" Right-of-Way 21 . Offer for dedication to the Public the Public Utility Easements . 22 . Offers of dedication shall be completed and recorded prior to or simultaneous to the recordation of the final map. 23 . A Drainage Maintenance Agreement , in a form acceptable to the City Attorney, shall be recorded with the deed to each parcel at the time it is first conveyed and a note to this effect shall be . placed on the final map,OR BUILD THE STORM SYSTEM TO CITY STANDARDS TO BE ACCEPTED INTO THE MAINTAINED CITY DRAINAGE SYSTEM. i 24 . Prior to the recording of the final map , a soils investigation ( as required by the Subdivision Map Act) shall be submitted, recommending corrective actions which will prevent structural damage to each structure proposed to be constructed in the area where soil problems exist , as indicated in the Preliminary Soils Report . The date of such reports, The name of the Engineer making the report , and the location where the reports are on file shall be noted on the final map. 25. All lots shall be individually connected to the public sewer system.Sewer laterals shall be extended to the frontage of each lot prior to the recording the final map. Permits for the connection to the sewer shall be obtained from the Public Works Department prior to the work being done. 26 . The applicant shall establish Covenants , Conditions and Restrictions (CCERs) for the regulation of land use,control of nuisances, architectural control of all buildings, driveway and landscape maintenance. These CCERs shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Attorney . and the Community Development Department prior to the recording of the final map. 27 . Zone Change ZC: 9-87 shall be approved and in effect prior to the recording of the final map. 28 . A final map in substantial conformance with the approved tentative map and in compliance with all conditions set forth herein shall be submitted for review and approval in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City' s Subdivision Ordinance prior to the recording of the final map. a . Monuments shall be set at all new property corners created and a Registered Civil Engineer or Licensed Land Surveyor shall indicate, by certificate on the final map, that the corners have been set by the date specific and that they will be sufficient to enable the survey to be retraced. b. A recently updated preliminary title report shall be submitted for review in conjunction with the processing of the final map. c . A preliminary subdivision guarantee shall be submitted for review in conjunction with the processing of the final map. 29 . Approval of this tentative map shall expire two years from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted pursuant to a written request prior to the expiration date. 30 . Applicant shall pay all applicable development fees in effect at the time of issuance of building permits . The Amapoa /Tecorida Drainage development fees shall be based on Multiple Family use of the site. • M E M O R A N D U M TO: City Council October 13, 1987 VIA: Michael Shelton, City Manager FROM/,7Henry Engen, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Zone Change 9-87 and Tentative Tract Map 10-87 LOCATION: 6875 Tecorida APPLICANT: Woodglen Ltd. REQUEST: To revise the existing RMF/16 (FH) zoning designation to RMF/16 (FH) (PD-7) allowing for the creation of a Planned Development Overlay providing for a small lot subdivision of 1.2 ' acres of vacant property into 9 lots varying in size from 3968 to 7074 square feet, and the establishment of Los Arboles as a private street name. • BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing of this matter at its September 15, 1987 meeting and recommended approval of Zone Change 9-87 and Tentative Parcel Map 10-87 in accordance with the findings contained in the attached staff report and the revised conditions of approval also attached. There was some discussion and public testimony given as reflected in the attached minutes excerpts. RECOMMENDATION• Approval of Tentative Parcel Map 10-87 subject to the revised condi- tions of approval, - PP and approval of Zone Change 9 87 by (1) reading by title onlyOrdinance e N o. 160 ; and (2) approval of Ordinance No. 160 for first reading. HE:ph Enclosures: Staff Report - September 15, 1987 Revised Conditions of Approval - September 15 , 1987 Ordinance No. 160 Minutes Excerpt - September 15 , 1987 cc: Woodglen Ltd. Cuesta Engineering CITY OF ATASCADERO Item: B-3 STAFF REPORT FOR: Planning Commission Meeting Date:Sept. 15, 1987 BY: Joel Moses , Associate Planner File No: ZC: 9-87 & TTM: 10-87 SUBJECT: Zone Change 4-87 and Tentative Tract Map 10-87 initiated by Woodglen Development Ltd. to rezone property at 6875 Tecorida Ave from RMF/16 (FH) to RMF/16 (FH) (PD-7) to allow for the development of the 1. 2 acre site into a small lot subdivision containing 9 residential lots varying in size from 3968 square feet to 7074 square feet. BACKGROUND: The site has been zoned RMF/16 (FH) (Residential Multiple Family with a Flood Hazard Overlay) since the establishment of the current Zoning Ordinance in 1983. The site has been designated on the current General Plan Land Use Map as High Density Multiple Family since 1980. The property was in a moratorium area for development for several years due to its location within the Amapoa / Tecorida Flood Area . The moratorium on development was only lifted with the establishment of standards for development within a flood area. The area is not designated at this time within a designated 100 year flood area, but is designated by the City in response to studies under taken by the City on flooding in the area. The applicants initially submitted a request to rezone and subdivide an additional parcel to the east of the site as a part of the project. After review by the staff and a determination that an Environmental Impact Report would be needed the applicant scaled down the project and reduced the potential environmental impacts. A. SITUATION AND FACTS: 1. Applicant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Woodglen Development Ltd. 2. Representative. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Cuesta Engineering 3. Project Address. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6875 Tecorida Ave 4. Legal Description. . . . . . . . . . . .Lots 30, 31 & 32 Block UA Atasc.Col. 5. Site Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1. 2 acres • Zone Change 9-87 & TTM 10-87 Sept. 15, 1987 Page 2 6. Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .RMF/16 (FH) Residential Multiple Family with a Flood Hazard Overlay 7. General Plan Designation. . . . .High Density MultiFamily 8. Existing Use. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Vacant lot 9. Environmental Status. . . . . . . . .Negative Declaration posted B. ANALYSIS: The application proposes to rezone the property to allow the re-subdivision of the land into a 9 unit small lot subdivision. The rezoning of the property will be required due to the property' s current zoning of RMF/16 (FH) requiring a minimum lot size of 1/2 acre and the required front yard setbacks of 25'-0" . As a part of that rezoning a specific plan for development and coinciding tract map are being presented for approval ( Exhibits B & C ) . The developer has also submitted a set of proposed development standards for the project (Exhibit D) . The site is currently undeveloped along the south side of Tecorida Road (undeveloped) ( ) east of San Andres Road. The site P contains a drainageway for the Amapoa/Tecorida area and a portion of another drainageway coming from the south. The site and adjoining road area also contain a number of trees. The adjoining propertys are currently zoned RMF/16 (FH) to the south and east . The property' s to the north across Tecorida Road are zoned CR(FH) (PD-3) (Commercial Retail with Flood Hazard and Planned Development overlays) . Across San Andres to the west the zoning changes to LSF-Y (FH) (Limited Single Family Residential, 1 acre minimum lot size with sewer with a Flood Hazard Overlay) In reviewing the project comments and information was acquired from several outside agencies that add to the environmental review of the project. The property is located close to a known archaeological site and a site survey was required as a part of the review. The survey noted no specific finds of archaeological artifacts; if any are found during construction the find would be reviewed at that time. Comments from Caltrans were also received as to the potential impacts of development along Morro Road. These impacts included delays and congestion at the Morro Road /Marchant Ave and the Morro Road/Atascadero Road intersections. Concern was also expressed as to the need for construction of additional drainage facilities. This is due to the design capacities of the existing 36" culverts under Highway 101 that were based on the undeveloped state of the drainage area (Amapoa/Tecorida) when designed and installed. The comments were • • Zone Change 9-87 & TTM 10-87 is Sept. 15, 1987 Page 3 reviewed by the Public Works Director and a traffic and drainage reports prepared for the project It was found that the current development fees and proposed development improvements would mitigate the potential impacts. The site was also reviewed for potential problems with flora and fauna removal. The plans were reviewed by the State Department of Fish and Game. After the review a steam alteration permit was issued under specified conditions listed in the permit. Comments were received from the Building division about the potential concerns as to the soils on the site. A soils report was prepared by a Register Civil Engineer for the site. The report was reviewed by the City' s Engineering division and found adequate to allow for the development of the site. The Fire Department' s review of the project showed no problems. Access was good but standard fire hydrants shall be required. Comments from utility companies requested standard easements and advised that the site can be served from existing facilities. Under the current RMF/16 zoning of the property of the site would fall under the hillside density standards. The application was submitted initially before the standards went into effect but will now have to comply with the new standards. At 16 units per acre the site could have held 19 residential apartments. The City' s current standards based on slope and the number of bedrooms on the site could allow for a varying degree of intensity of development. Densities could range from 16 units per acre for 1 bedroom units to 6 units per acre for 4 bedroom units. This could allow for the development of up to 19, 14, 10 or 7 residential units on the site. Under the developers proposal for 3 bedroom units on 0-10% slope a density of 8 units per acre maybe allowed. This would allow a maximum of 10 units on the site. The proposal is to provide 9 - 3 bedroom residential units on the site and thus would be within the City' s density standards. The proposed density would also be well below the maximum of 19 units possible on the site. The proposed site plan is also seeking to modify the street frontage setbacks that are normally required for this type of development. The normal 25'-0" setback on the front of the proposed lots is proposed to be reduced to 10 '-0" on most of the lots. The design still provides for a 20 '-0" drive to a double car garage for each of the units. The street side yards are shown as being approximately 10 '-0" which would be in conformance with zoning ordinance standards (Sec 9 4. 107 (a) 1) . • ! • Zone Change 9-87 & TTM 10-87 Sept. 15, 1987 Page 4 The Zoning Ordinance in allowing for the establishment of a Planned Development requires special findings (Sec. 9-3. 644) . These four findings deal with the needs and the benefits derived from the modification of the zoning ordinance standards for the project. The proposed projects smaller lots and reduced setbacks can only be approved through the Planned Development Overlay process. The Overlay would promote the orderly and harmonious development of the city by coordinating the development of three 10 parcels of land as opposed to the random development of the properties. The proposal would benefit the City also in the reduction of potential residential density in the area. The proposed project could provide more affordable housing for the community, while reducing the potential density of development on the site. Thus all four finding required by the Ordinance can be made for this proposal. In summary the development has been reviewed for potential impacts and staff finds that the impacts can be mitigated. The project meets the density standard and actually reduces potential development. The project design has been reviewed and • it is recommended that the required findings can be made for the. approval of the project. The proposed street name of Los Arboles has been reviewed with the local emergency response agencies and no problems noted. C RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Zone Change 9-87 and Tentative Tract Map TTM 10-87 based on the findings contained in Exhibit E, Findings of Approval and Exhibit F, Draft Ordinance and conditions contained in Exhibit G, Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map 10-87. including the use of Los Arboles Circle as a street name for the project ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A - Location Map Exhibit B - Site Plan (ZC: 09-87) Exhibit C - Tract Map (TTM: 10-87) Exhibit D - Developers Statement Exhibit E - Findings of Approval (TTM: 10-87) Exhibit F - Draft Ordinance (ZC: 09-87) Exhibit G - Conditions of Approval (TTM: 10-87) �, --tom ., I► � �. ii� � .. ENRON 04- Ira • �.'�'" �i� 0I �y tI / �► PEPe+ • I t WA �. � ♦ � -�-\ice �,�► • � v 11 f. � 0 EXHIBIT B SITE PLAN CITY OF A TASCADERO 6875 Tecorida Road -+�s�.li�� Zone Change ZC: 9-87 `s COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Tent.Tract Map TTM: 10-87 . DEPARTMENT woodglen Ltd/Cuesta G N4 Ii •• t __ _ x .I r;;; (O lu in 1 1 � � � � ��� , •�/) j31 I � N Ji �8 41.ISI Y m �! ,' r - `€ 't �`8 SII II . , I ArIDR- v .. E < 1 rn 2 i N ti F Y ITI' ly a I J I ; J y r� l � IC i r U �- S s C m ' _0 00 In In . < In • cae,R' In In Z' V acd f [- m !si IitF. .....__.... F:TE rv.H tJP,70G�.EN �� Gro A40 EXHIBIT C TRACT MAP CITY OF ATA SCADERO 6875 Tecorida Road 197•-, Zone Change ZC: 9-87 `ascan ! COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Tent.Tract Map TTM: 7 DEPARTMENT Woodglen Ltd/Cuesta All 18Gl oz Jnr N tl Q 9 ' ---- I a�' 1 ���� r�� � .tea -- '_.---_—�_ l;"'--:..-_-.••-.,. ---- ---------- ------------ -------- j-- aa —T ---- -- _ . IE ------------ e Em i !A N i ♦N O R E! .� V f m U.F 1 �XHIBIT D Developers Sta. , 6875 Tecorida Road Zone Change ZC: 9-87 Tent Tract Map TTM:10-87 WOODGLEN PROPERTY Woodalen Ltd/Cuesta Proposed Development Standards a. ) Approval of a Site Utilization Plan (SUP) reflecting a Master Plan of Development for a residential development and related uses is required as part of the "PD" overlay zoning designation. The SUP shall be incorporated in the "PD" development standards. b. ) Any revisions or deviations from the approved SUP shall require a Conditional Use Permit c. ) The Level of Processing for individual building or grading permits shall be a plot plan provided the proposal conforms to "PD" development standards. d. ) Building height shall be limited to thirty (30) feet, (not to exceed two (2) stories). e. ) All street, sewer, water and underground utilities shall be • provided by the developer prior to occupancy of any building. f. ) Each lot in the development may be developed separately and individually per the development standards. g. ) The developer or applicant shall pay all applicable fees, such as drainage fees, school fees, development fees, as required for a single-family residence as each building permit is drawn or issued. h. ) Development within the"PD" zone shall conform to the Flood Hazard Overlay Standards for the project area. i . ) No access shall be provided from San Andres Avenue. Access from Tecorida Avenue shall be limited to two (2) private road access encroachments per the SUP. j . ) All project streets shall be private easement roads. The Gross Area of each lot shall include a portion of the private easement road. A private Road Maintenance Agreement shall be executed by all future property owners within the development. 0 0 k. ) The following minimum setbacks shall be provided as shown on the SUP: 1 . ) Front setback shall be 10' to face of building except that a minimum of 20' shall be provided from the edge of the private road to the face of the garage door. 2. ) Rear yard setback shall be 15' except along Tecorida Avenue where the rear yard setback shall be 12.51 . 3. ) Side yard setback shall be 10' for all corner lots on both public and private streets. Interior side yard setback shall be 51 . 1 . ) Six (6) foot high solid fencing shall be provided along property lines at San Andres and Tecorida Avenues with landscape breaks for tree planting as shown on the SUP and landscape plans. m. ) All utilities shall be provided underground. n. ) All residences shall be constructed with a 2-car garage. �I • 0 ! • Supplemental Statement Woodglen Development 6875 Tecorida Avenue The attached application is a request to establish a "PD" overlay zone for 4 individual lots currently zoned RMF-16/FH. The applicant proposes a single-family residential project rather than multi-family apartment units permitted under the current zoning. The project proposes 15 units (7 units per acre) rather than 33 units (16 units per acre) allowed under current zoning. Single-family detached units are in keeping with the mixed residential uses in the neighborhood. The "PD" overlay zone would allow creation of smaller lots so that the project homes and lots can be individually and privately owned. The "PD" Development Standards will ensure orderly development of individual lots and maintenance of common easements and facilities. The concurrent, planned development of the 4 separate lots will avoid piecemeal work on the drainage areas. A master plan also improves traffic circulation, reducing the number of access points to public • streets by providing one private street rather than four separate driveways with parking lots. "PD" modification of setbacks allows for better useable yards by reducing front yards and increasing rear yards. "PD" control of landscape design and maintenance ensures adequate screening and shading of the project. The attached development standards are proposed to supercede the existing RMF zoning standards. 0 i EXHIBIT E - Findings for Approval • Tentative Tract Map 10-87 6875 Tecorida Road Sept. 15, 1987 FINDINGS 1 . The creation of the proposed parcels conform to the Zoning Ordinance and the General Plan land use designation , densities and other policies. 2 . The creation of these parcels , in conformance with the recommended Conditions of Approval, will not have a significant adverse effect upon the environment. The Negative Declaration prepared for the project is adequate. 3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. 4 . The site is physically suitable for the density of the development proposed. 5 . The design of the subdivision , and the proposed improvements,will not cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish and wildlife or their habitat 6 . The design of the subdivision , and the type of the improvements, will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or the use of property within the proposed subdivision; or substantially equivalent alternate easements are provided. 7. The proposed subdivision complies with Section 66474. 6 of the State Subdivision Map Act as to the methods of handling and discharge of waste. 8. The proposed subdivision will be in conformance with approved Zone Change 9-87, RMF/16 (FH) (PD-7) and the existing development standards for the City of Atascadero. 9. The proposed Zone Change and Tract Map are in compliance with all pertinent city policy or criteria adopted by ordinance or resolution of the City Council. • • EXHIBIT G - Conditions of Approval Tentative Map 10-87 September 15,1987 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1 . Water shall be obtained from the Atascadero Mutual Water Company. Water lines shall be extended to the frontage of each parcel or its public utilities easement prior to the recording of the final map. 2. All existing and proposed utility, pipeline, open space, or other easement are to be shown on the final map. If there are building or other restrictions related to the easements, they shall be noted on the final map. 3. Grading, and Drainage plans , prepared by a registered Civil Engineer shall be submitted for review and approval by the Community Development and Public Works Departments prior to the issuance of any building permits or the recording of the final map. 4. Obtain encroachment permit from the city of Atascadero Public Works Department. Sign an Inspection Agreement and a curb Gutter Agreement, guaranteeing that the work will be done and the . inspections paid for, prior to the issuance of a building permit and construct improvements as directed by the encroachment by the encroachment permit prior to the final building inspection or the recording of the final map. 5. A road maintenance agreement, in a form acceptable to the City Attorney, shall be recorded with the deed to each parcel at the time it is first conveyed. A note to this effect shall appear PPear on the Final Map. 6 . Road improvement plans prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer shall be submitted to the Community Development and Public Works Departments for review and approval for the construction Tecorida Road, the subdivisions internal street (Los Arboles) and the reconstruction of San Andres or recording of the final map, or prior to the issuance of any building permit, which ever comes first. Plans shall include, but not limited to : a. Tecorida Road: Design shall conform to design of Tecorida Road being prepared in connection with proposed development at 6715 Morro Road per Precise Plan 03-87. Plans shall include a minimum paved section of 15 '-0" plus City standard curb, gutter and 5 '-0" sidewalk. Design shall include measures to save and preserve trees within the right-of-way. b. San Andres Road: Design shall include City standard curb, gutter, 5 '-0" sidewalk and additional paveout, width to be determined by the City Engineer not to exceed 15 '-01' . Design shall include measures to protect and preserve trees within the right-of-way. • 0 c. Subdivision' s internal street (Los Arboles) : Design shall is include measures to preserve and protect existing trees on the site. 7 . Construction of the public road improvements shall be completed (or bonded for) prior to the recording of the final map. 8. All relocation and/or alteration of existing utilities shall be responsibility of the developer at his sole expense. 9 . The newly created lots shall be connected to the Public Sewer. All annexation permit fees shall be paid for the newly created lot prior to the recording of the final map. Sewer improvement plans shall be submitted for review and approval by the Public Works Department prior to the recording of the final map. 10. The applicant shall deposit with the Director of Public Works a dollar amount determined by the Director of Public Work, which shall be utilized for the future development of improvements for the implementation of a Routes to School Plan for Santa Rosa Elementary School. 11 . Public Improvement plans prepared for the site shall be reviewed and approved by the Fire Department. The plans shall include two standard fire hydrants. Design and location shall be . approved prior to the recording of the final map. 12. Parcels 6 & 7 shall have no direct access to San Andres Road Parcels 1, 9, 8 & 7 shall have no direct access on to Tecorida Road. Access shall be by way of the subdivisions internal street (Los Arboles) . A note to that effect shall appear on the final map. 13. An address identification signs shall be approved as a part of the public improvement plans . the signs shall contain 4' reflective address numbers for each residential unit served by a driveway. The signs shall be located on the right hand side of the drive way and shall be so placed as not to effect the visibility of the intersection. 14 . Prior to the approval of the improvement plans by the Director of Public Works, either the Subdivider shall acquire sufficient title or interest in the off-site land to allow the improvements to be made as required by these conditions : or the City Council , upon request by and at the expense of the subdivider, shall have made all appropriate findings and adopted Resolution of Necessity as required by law so that the City may exercise its power of Emminent Domain. 15 . Drainage Facilities shall be constructed to City of Atascadero standards. All work shall be completed or bonded for prior the final building inspection or the recording of the final map. • • • 16 . The Subdivider shallP rovide drainage easements and/or drainage releases from the points of concentration of stormwater leaving the project boundary through adjoining properties to the nearest natural watercourses as approved by the Public Works Department if applicable. 17 . All lot grading and drainage improvements shall require write certification by a registered Civil Engineer that all work has been completed and is in full compliance with the approved plans. 18. Allradin and erosion control measures shall be designed g g by a registered Civil Engineer and constructed in accordance with n the City of Atascadero grading codes and standards. Prior to the final building inspection, said engineer shall submit to the City written certification that grading is in conformance with said codes and standards , including all Flood Hazard Overlay Zone requirements. 19 . The subdivider shall install all street signs , traffic delineation devices, warning and regulatory signs, guardrails, barricades , and other similar devices were required by the Director of Public Works. Signs shall be in conformance with the Department of Public works standards and the current State of • California uniform sign chart. Installation of traffic devices shall be subject to review and modifications after construction. 20. Offer of dedication to the City of Atascadero the following rights-of-Way and or easements: Street Name: Tecorida Road Limits: 20 '-0" along westerly edge of property frontage adjacent to Tecorida Road. Minimum Width: 40 '-0" Right-of-Way 21 . Offer for dedication to the Public the Public Utility Easements. 22. Offers of dedication shall be completed and recorded prior to or simultaneous to the recordation of the final map. 23. A Drainage Maintenance Agreement, in a form acceptable to the City Attorney, shall be recorded with the deed to each parcel at the time it is first conveyed and a note to this effect shall be placed on the final map. 24 . Prior to the recording of the final map, a soils investigation ( as required by the Subdivision Map Act) shall be submitted, recommending corrective actions which will prevent structural damage to each structure proposed to be constructed in . the area where soil problems exist , as indicated in the Preliminary Soils Report. The date of such reports, The name of the Engineer making the report, and the location where the reports are on file shall be noted on the final map. 25. All lots shall be individually connected to the public sewer system.Sewer laterals shall be extended to the frontage of each lot prior to the recording the final map. Permits for the connection to the sewer shall be obtained from the Public Works Department prior to the work being done. 26 . The applicant shall establish Covenants , Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) for the regulation of land use,control of nuisances, architectural control of all buildings, driveway and landscape maintenance. These CC&Rs shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Attorney and the Community Development Department prior to the recording of the final map. 27. Zone Change ZC: 9-87 shall be approved and in effect prior to the recording of the final map. 28 . A final map in substantial_ conformance with the approved tentative map and in compliance with all conditions set forth herein shall be submitted for review and approval in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City' s Subdivision Ordinance prior to the recording of the final map. a. Monuments shall be set at all new property corners created and a Registered Civil Engineer or Licensed Land Surveyor shall indicate, by certificate on the final map, that the corners have been set by the date specific and that they will be sufficient to enable the survey to be retraced. b. A recently updated preliminary title report shall be submitted for review in conjunction with the processing of the final map. c . A preliminary subdivision guarantee shall be submitted for review in conjunction with the processing of the final map. 29. Approval of this tentative map shall expire two years from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted pursuant to a written request prior to the expiration date. 30. Applicant shall pay all applicable development fees in effect at the time of issuance of building permits. The Amapoa/Tecorida Drainage development fees shall be based on Multiple Family use of the site. • Minutes - Planning Commission - September 15, 1987 . 2. Zone Chan a 12-87 : R uest initiated by Sandra L. Genzone t revise the existing IP dustrial Park) zoning designat' to CS (Commercial Service on approximately 0.75 are of vacant land. Subject site is 1 ated at 8750 E1 Cam' o Real; legal description being Lot 3 Block 7, Atas ero Colony. Mr. Moses presented th sta report on this matter recommending approval of the zone cha request noting that this property cur- rently has a split zo ' g o ndustrial Park and Commercial Ser- vice zoning which place in 983 and that the zoning was being sought to enable edevelopment as motel. Sandra Gen ne, applicant, appeared an tated she was happy with staff' s ecommendation. M ON: Made by Commissioner Kidwell, seconde y Commissioner Copelan and carried 6 :0 with a roll ca vote to recom- mend approval of Zone Change 12-87. 3. Zone Change 9-87 and Tentative Parcel Map 10-87: Request initiated by Woodglen Ltd. (Cuesta Engineering) to revise the existing RMF/16 (FH) zoning designation to RMF/16 (FH) (PD7) allowing for the creation of a Planned Development . Overlay providing for a small lot subdivision consisting of the subdivision of 2.1 acres of vacant property into 9 lots varying in size from 3968 to 7074 square feet and the estab- lishment of Los Arboles as a private street name. Subject site is located at 6875 Tecorida in the City of Atascadero; legal description being Lots 30 , 31 and 32 of Block UA in Atascadero Colony. Commissioner Michielssen stepped down from the Commission due to a possible conflict of interest. Mr. Moses apologized for the lateness in the distribution of the staff report and proceeded to present the report recommending con- ditional approval of the requests. He pointed out a set of re- vised conditions of approval for the tentative map, which the Com- mission took a few minutes to review. Paul Sensibaugh, Public Works Director , responded to various ques- tions from the Commission pertaining to drainage requirements, circulation patterns in the area, CalTrans' priority in signaliza- tion for the Morro Road-San Andres intersection. Mike Bewsey, agent for the applicant, stated he had reviewed the revised questions and had no problems with them. He then answered questions from the Commission. 3 • 0 Minutes - Planning Commission - September 15, 1987 Commissioner Bond stated he liked the design and plan of the project. MOTION: Made by Commissioner Bond, seconded by Commissioner Copelan and carried 5 :0 on a roll call vote to recommend approval of Zone Change 9-87 as reflected in the draft resolution and Tentative Tract Map 10-87 subject to the revised conditions of approval. Commissioner Michielssen took his place back on the Commission. Tentative Parcel Map 21-87: Request initiated by Tom Gouff (Dan Stewart) to r subdivide two existing developed residential lots totalin 2.03 acres i to four lots varying in size from 22,990 squ re feet to 20 225 square feet. Subject site is located 8865 Portola Roa • legal description being a portion of Lo 32, Block 7, Atasc dero Colony. Mr. Moses pre ented the staff report recommending approval of the the application He pointed out a revised s of conditions which superceded the c dition contained in the a enda packet. Mr. Moses and Mr. S sibaugh then respon ed to various questions from the Commission. • Tom Gouff, applicant, to ked about t e background involved in ini- tially trying to obtain a of spl ' back in 1978 through the County. He expressed c ncern with Conditions #4 (improvement plans for private access dri w ) ; #14 (fire hydrant) ; #6 and . #8 (road improvements) ; #12 (an xation fees) . Discussion followed with clarifications and reaso i s on the conditions offered by Mr. Moses and Mr. Sensibaug . There was discussion amo the Commi sion concerning the flag lot figuration; the possibl reduction in ots from four lots to three lots; and concerns wit the road easeme t to Parcel 3; and the possibility of a re sign of the site p n. Discussion also cen- tered on clarification and possible modifi tions to the condi- tions which were concern to the applicant MOTION: Made b Commissioner Bond and seconde by Commissioner Kidw 1 to deny Tentative Parcel Map 21 7. Discussion ontinued among the Commission. The motion was defeated 4 : 2 with a roll call te: AYES: Commissioners Bond and Kidwell NOES: Commissioners Michielssen, Lopez-Balbontin, ope- • lan, and Chairman Nolan 4 'N-`)A� § A M E M O R A N D U M TO: City Council October 27, 1987 VIA: Michael Shelton, City Manager FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Sycamore Road Surplus Property BACKGROUND: At' the City Council' s meeting of July 14 , 1987, the 'Council considered the attached staff report and took the following actions: 1. Accepted the report from the Planning Commission, which gives the Council future discretion to dispose of the property as surplus to City needs. 2. Referred the matter to the Parks and Recreation Department for • consideration as a possible recreation site for the neighborhood. The Parks and Recreation Commission has reviewed the matter (refer to attached Memorandum, dated September 14, 1987) . PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: As indicated, the Commission supports the action to declare the prop- erty as surplus, and requests that all revenue received from the sale of property be used to purchase property at Morro Road and Amapoa for the development of a Community Center . The property was not consid- ered of appropriate scale or interest to provide for recreation needs. However , the Planning Commission has recommended that there be a 25 foot access recreational easement crossing the site to connect the neighborhood to the Salinas River area. This would also allow for emergency access in time of flooding. . PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT NEEDS: The Public Works Department has indicated that they will need the property over the next year for access while bridge construction is undertaken. But after that time there would be no public use needed (except for emergency/recreational access) . • RECOMMENDATION: Receive the Parks and Recreation Commission' s recommendation and di- rect staff to dispose of the properties after the Public Works Depart- ment no longer needs it for access. HE:ph Enclosure: Parks and Recreation Commission Memorandum - September 14, 1987 Staff Report to City Council - July 14, 1987 cc: Mike Lara MEMORANDUM September 14 , 1987 To : City Council Planning Commission Via: Mike Shelton, City Manager From: Parks and Recreation Commission Subject : Traffic Way and Sycamore Road Properties At the September 10 meeting , the Parks and Recreation Commission took the following action : 1. Recommended that City owned property located on Sycamore Road in River Gardens (APN 28-092-09) be designated as surplus property. All revenue received from the sale of this property shall be used to purchase prop- erty in the 8000 Block of Morro Road and Amapoa Avenue for the develop- ment of a Community Center. 2 . Recommended that City owned property located on Traffic Way (APN-29-091- 06) adjacent to 01 Smokey Meats be designated as surplus property. All revenue received from the sale of this property shall be used to purchase property in the 8000 Block of Morro Road and Amapoa Ave . for the develop- ment of a Community Center. In addition , the Commission recommends either a lot line adjustment or easement prior to sale for the purpose of ingress/egress to the Traffic Way Multi-Purpose Fields , as a driveway is planned for a corner of the property. Some type of slope maintenance should be part of any sale to prevent excessive water runoff. Finally, to provide for the sale of this property the commission recommends this property be re-zoned from Public to Industrial. The decision to recommend surplusing these properties was made more difficult due to the lack of a Master Plan for the department . To make future decisions on properties in the City, it is imperative that the department have a planning document available for guidance . AX AV-1 Mike Lara, Chairman Parks and Recreation Commission cc : Henry Engen Bob Best h ET:j / AGENDA DATA_ l HEM � _. E M 0 R A N D U M is TO: City Council July 14 , 1987 VIA: Michael Hicks, Acting City Manager FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director SUBJECT: General Plan Conformity Report: Sycamore Road BACKGROUND: On June 16, 1987 , the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the above-referenced matter. Upon review, the Commission recom- mended that the property be designated as surplus property as outlined in the attached report (on a 6 :1 vote) . There was brief discussion among the Commission concerning a suitable building site for the property. There was no public testimony given. RECOMMENDATION: Receive the Conformity Report per the Planning Commission' s recommend- ation. HE:ps City of Atascadero Item: B-7 STAFF REPORT FOR: Planning Commission Meeting Date: June 16 , 1987 BY: Joel Moses, Associate Plannern. Lot Project Address: Sycamore Road P 4 , Blk H, Atas. Colony) SUBJECT: General Plan Conformity Report - City sale of real property located on Sycamore Road north of Hidalgo Road in River Gardens. (APN 28-092-09 Northern ptn. Lot 4, Blk H, Atascadero Colony) (Exhibits A & B) . BACKGROUND: The City of Atascadero acquired the approximate 12,000 square foot property as a part of the recent transfer of properties. The County had previously noted the property as surplus and had contacted the City in 1985 . The City has found no specific public purpose for the • property and now is seeking to have the property declared as surplus property so the property can be disposed of. ANALYSIS: The property is presently vacant. The City presently has no plans to use the property except as a detour route during the reconstruction of the Sycamore Road Bridge. The adjoining property is currently gen- erally developed with single family residential uses. The area to the East is owned by the Water Company and is used for gravel/sand extrac- tion. The area is designated Moderate Density Single Family on the General Plan; the corresponding zoning is RSF-Y (Residential Single Family - minimum lot size of 1 acre with sewer 1 1/2 acre without sewer) . The site is currently not provided with sewer but is within the Urban Service Area. The area to the West is within a leachfield problem area as noted in the City' s sewer study (John Wallace &Assoc- iates) . A review of the General Plan makes no specific statement as to the need for the property. However, a need is noted as to the need for the retention of an easement for emergency access and recreational use. Additional comments made in the General Plan might note the site as undevelopable. The Open Space and Conservation Element notes the site in the inundation and alluvium areas (Maps X-1 and X-2) (Exhibits C&D) and as such falls under the Public Safety Policies (page 84) sta- ting, "that permits shall be denied in the potential inundation areas" . Staff Report W 4C General Plan Conformity Report Page Two RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends that the property be designated as surplus prop- erty, but maintaining a 25 foot access and recreational easement cros- sing the site connecting Sycamore Road and the Water Company property for access and recreational uses. The action would qualify as a Class 12 categorical exemption (sale of surplus property) from the California Environmental Quality Act pro- cess. JM:ph Attachments: Exhibit A - Location Map Exhibit B - A.P.N. Map Exhibit C - Alluvium Map Exhibit D - Inundation Map 0 a� ,_► �bio i�ii� � � �, ��--��-�� ,; i i ��,i jam,` � �� �� ,,'� � ► EXHIBIT B A.P.N. MAP ' .,. -..� CITY OF ATA GENERAL PLAN CON . REP. �� ,, SCADERO SURPLUS PROPERTY SALE ,97.E rtSCAD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SYCAMORE ROAD DEPARTMENT 44 //7.30 — i 5 04 rri W � 4 � 0 •� O !p \ O S�E G� 0' O �• OVI alb y� V A � o EI c') w .A :off �r'a+ �O��ad Shcd O EXHIBIT C ALLUVIUM MAP CITY OF ATASCADERO GENERAL PLAN CONF. REP.— SURPLUS PROPERTY SALE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SYCAMORE ROAD DEPARTMENT /� rte•}-� tt r�'��`�' J '''. �' 0;i }JI' ' � +,rir Ct_ � -? i !31 s s hs,� R ,� �,,J•...�1� '2y � I � •' ;�+,��1 ` S y+,� ;� ^r � � a # 1 -.r� r �•,i ll �y".`„ +y'`f rl� '`�.r�y,�r"i �,(��>, -/I,�.s•� \.:i'`1h� j �r� s. .��., � � � :� .�� /i � � i� i :x;; ;, .• ))) VV �•. I i<, t' J. Va, L 1 1 <' �I�/ �y�v r, '`�/�`� �'f?`�'�+�1°`ri tr y � y f ty���y Farr _ •^('" �t•r• f�'j•�;a" it �' .1 ,.' .,Y=i'r .G• 1 C�l't�'. �,/r V y '�.i J= v�,• ��r - ijr �' \t `s �'• �t'/�`- �.-•tir`'_, �i �•:�: try/.l j �.:Y s'rl ,,� 4�1'� ! o j•� '+�.� SITE -44 In co En 33 C cl kt-• /. V, /1.., �Y �•'• T' �! sf• MAP X-'� r� ta' \` [ ���^r, • }< — '' .�/''ice N `�r'��:C`r;_ _ .Irk':• 1 i; �i' � .�r '�+ G7 D� � • � m " m c m o q 0 f � EXHIBIT D INUNDATION MAP I CITY dtsr� ■� •^ OF ATASCADERO GENERAL PLAN CONF. REP . SURPLUS PROPERTY SALE sc1w COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SYCAMORE ROAD DEPARTMENT �I �':'� �'::�,p•�.,,� %`'�-. .��...i�i t 'f�'ti-rk '�'� III J Y ,• ):w C r 'Qs � •:;a �/} ` h-•f ! � ---'mow � <l �`�� U � a F mN 1 r X > 1 Ln yt •\ L r•Y.r a✓ '• ' 'I S: J 1 c t.1 N .., � a --x��tea...:t ••• � -c §I w) �l `�:� n� >`, !, ,\ - r i �7 wP ill V l �\ �f A.. .>,` ��' t> >L 1 / J - .; � t,. 1 s !✓' > ..ova-y. ! .r "�• >7 . �/� �f � 1•'- ~�!� ..��� �.. Ir/ \\ / py���t�i�4� .c/ �.. .moi �" t-a 4 J , •'` a J` "+' t �.. ?. — 5.ITE - ,• - r \ 01 , *.: ❑ D 0 ') n ❑ o r SS m r 13 Z a G] 0 �- k t',� •• i m m +. ❑ 00 0 �.:.: 3 0 D D � m • n n 3 m m D a � r D 0 D 3 MEETING TING AG7NDA (Revision made to Recam�ndatio ) — t)�`,T= CJ Z7 I1EM M E M 0 R A N D U M (Revised 10/23/87) October 27, 1987 To : City Council Via: Mike Shelton, City Manager From: Bob Best, Parks and Recreation Directo Subject : Request for License Agreement BACKGROUND Staff has received a request from Vandenberghe Construction Company to utilize an unused park service road at the northern boundary of Paloma Creek Park. The purpose of the request is for ingress/egress to the apartment complex now under construction. The area being requested is seldom used by park staff, as another service entrance is located in the central portion of the park. In discussions with Mr. Jim Spadaro , he has indicated a desire to provide any necessary precautions needed for safety, and the company is willing to provide additional improve- ments to Paloma Park above the requirements already in place relating to the &trooms. ISSUE STATEMENT The area of concern is whether the City should allow a private company to utilize public property for their private use over a prolonged period of time. In this particular case, it could be as long as 7 or 8 months, according to Mr. Spadaro . The Vandenberghe Company is willing to address the issue of safety by provid- ing a chain link fence from the point of entry to their property line, eliminating the potential of vehicles getting into the park area. They are also willing to provide someone for traffic control during any time the City deems necessary. In addition, for rental consideration they are willing to complete some badly needed work in the park -- either completion of all concrete work around the restrooms or paving the service road to the parking lot. This would save the City the expense of materials and labor for one of these projects . RECOMMENDATION Approve a License Agreement with Vandenberghe Construction Company for usage of a service entrance providing the following conditions are met: 1 . A hold harmless clause is included in the agreement, and the City is named as an additional insured. • 2. Hours of Operation: Monday-Friday: 7 a.m. - 5 p.m. ; No Saturday or Sunday entry allowed, except as needed security . Page 2 (Revision made to Rection #7) (Revised - 10/23/87) 7 3. Installation of chain link fence between park and service road for the duration of use. 4. Traffic control employee to be provided during all hours of operatio• 5. Dust control of parking lot and service road to be provided by water truck furnished by Vandenberghe. Water provided at expense of Van denberghe. 6. Paving of service road or concrete work to be completed according to the master plan for the park. All work completed shall be to City code. Completion date : November 30, 1987. 7• Agreement Time Period: October 27 1987 - September 30, 1988.:- Noy° extensibn: of time without authorization of City-.Council. FISCAL IMPACT There would be no fiscal impact to the City. As a result of the usage of this area, the City would benefit by the completion of additional work at the park. • t • Yq • s • LICENSE AGREEMENT TIiIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 27th day of October, 1987 , by and between the City of Atascadero, a municipal government of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as "City" , and VANDENBERGHE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, a private contractor, hereinafter referred to as "VANDENBERGHE" , Witnesseth In consideration of the mutual covenants and upon the conditions hereinafter stated, the parties hereto agree as follows : 1 . City hereby agrees to Vandenberghe a license to use and improve a service road on the perimeter of Paloma Creek for the purpose of ingress/egress for its employees and vendors during the life of this agreement . All improvements to the service road must be approved by the Director of Parks and Recreation prior to construction. 2 . Vandenberghe understands and agrees that the property herein described is a portion of Paloma Creek Park and was leased to the City on the condition that it be used for park purposes . Vandenberghe further understands and agrees that this license is granted upon the condition that any and all installations and construction made hereunder will be made in such a manner as not to interfere with the use of the property for park purposes . 3 . Vandenberghe agrees to relocate or remove, at its own expense, any facilities installed hereunder whenever , in the sole discretion of City, such reloca1_ion or removal is necessary. 4 . Vandenberghe agrees , upon completing any installations or repairs upon the above described property, to repair any damage done by Vandenberghe in ;Waking such installations or repairs and to r-place any plantings or trees injured or destroyed, and to restore the property as nearly as possible to she condition in which it was prior to such installations or repairs . 5 . The parties agree that the installation, r.:aintenance, and repair of any installaticns under this license shall be at the sole expense of Vandenberghe , and that City shall bear none of the costs hereof and :3hall be held ti:a:::less from any cl,— therefor . o . Vandenberghe covenant., and agrees to indemnify and to hold Citv, its offices , agents , and employees , harmless from any �:nd all claims of any nature whatsoever ,-which ari-se or may ari_;e . by reason of the granting of this license or from or by reason of any of Vandenberghe ' s operations 'Linder this license or otherwise , and Vandenberghe further agrees to indemnify incl compensate City .l in full for any loss or damage to any City property whatsoever • caused by or arising cut of the granting of this license or by reason of Vandenberghe ' s operations hereunder. 7 . There is hereby reserved to City, its employees and agents , a right of entry to this service road for park purposes . S . Vandenberghe, by accepting the license granted herein, expressly agrees for itself , its successors and assigns , that it will not erect nor permit the erection of any structure or object on the land covered by the license herein granted above the surface of the ground level thereof without the specific prior approval in writing of the Director of Parks and Recreation. In the event the aforesaid covenant is breached, City reserves the right to enter on said land and to remove the offending structure or object , all of which shall be at the expense of Vandenberghe. 9 . Hours of usage of the service road are Monday-Friday, 7 a.m. -5 p.m. exclusively. No Saturday or Sunday usage shall be allowed. 10 . Vandenberghe agrees to-' install , at their expense, a chain link fence at a height of 61 , from the service road entrance to the park boundary adjoining the Vandenberghe project . Said completed work shall be subject to approval by the Director of Parks and Recreation. 11 . Traffic control employee to be provided during all hours of operation at the sole expense of Vandenberghe. 12 . Dust control of parking lot and service road shall be provided on all as needed basis and at the sole expense of Vandenberghe. 13 . Paving of service road or concrete work to be completed according to the master plan for the park. All work completed shall be to City requirements . Complet_on date: November 30 , 1937 . 14 . Agreement Time Period: This; agreement shall be in force from OCtcbr�!r 27 , 19137 -May 31 , 1933 . No c'.:tei_ isign of gime shall be granted vii .out the approval of the City Council . 15 . in the event the :3ervice road ad is needed for pazrk purposes , the City shall give Vandenberghe a minimum of 30 days notice to Vacate the area. City agrees t11is Would allly be done in an emergency. 16 . Vandenberghe , by accepting The license granted herein, expressly agrees for it:3elf , it successo-1-s and assigns , that _t -- will not make use of said _l; cense in any manner which might _ interfere with the normal usage of Palo;:2a Creek Park by the community. In the event the aforesaid covenant is breached, City is reserves the right to enter on said land and cause the abatement (Revision made to Section 14) . (Revised - 10/23/87) in full for any loss or damage to any City property whatsoever caused by or arising out of the granting of this license or by reason of Vandenberghe ' s operations hereunder. 7 . There is hereby reserved to City, its employees and agents , a right of entry to this service road for park purposes . 8 . Vandenberghe, by accepting the license granted herein, expressly agrees for itself, its successors and assigns , that it will not erect nor permit the erection of any structure or object on the land covered by the license herein granted above the surface of the ground level thereof without the specific prig approval in writing of the Director of Parks and Recreation. In the event the aforesaid covenant is breached, City reserves the right to enter on said land and to remove the offending structure or object, all of which shall be at the expense of Vandenberghe. 9 . Hours of usage of the service road are Monday-Friday, 7 a.m.-5 p.m. exclusively. No Saturday or Sunday usage shall be allowed. 10 . Vandenberghe agrees tof install , at their expense, a chain link fence at a height of 61 , from the service road entrance to the park boundary adjoining the Vandenberghe project . Said completed work shall be subject to approval by the Director . of Parks and Recreation. 11 . Traffic control employee to be provided during all hours of operation at the sole expense of Vandenberghe . 12 . Dust control of parking lot and service road shall be provided on an as needed basis and at the sole expense of Vandenberghe. 13 . Paving of service road or concrete work to be completed according to the master plan for the park. All work completed shall be to Cit.1 requirements . Completion date: November 30 , 1937. 1`� • Agreement Time Period?. This agreement shall be in force from October 27, 1987 - September 30, 1988. No extension of time shall be granted without the approval of the City Council. 15 . In the event the :service r. oacl is needed for park purposes , the City shall give Vandenberghe a minimum of 30 days notice to vacate the area. (:_�� arr^ P.3 > �- 7 tl a tvc»ilc., only be done in an emergency. 16 . Vandenberghe , by accept-'rig the license granted herein, expressly agr. ec?s for itself , it successors and assigns , that _t ----_- - ---- will not make ^� � , _.se o_ said 14cense in any ::fanner which might interfere with the normal usage of Pa.lo;na Creek Pari: by the community. In the event the aforesaid covenant is breached, City reserves the right to cuter on said land and cause the abatemelit of such interference at the expense of Vandenberghe. IN WITNESS WIiEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunder set their hands and seal the day and year first above written. CITY OF ATASCADERO VANDENBERGIiE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY By -- — Barbara Norris , Mayor Approved as to Content : By Michael Shelton City Manager Approved as to Form: --------------------- .Jef-frey G . .Jorgensen City Attorney MEEMG AGENDA DAM U Z t77 t7EM _ . MEMORANDUM TO: City Council THROUGH: Mike Shelton, City Manager FROM: -,�Atfa ul Sensibaugh , Director of Public Works Valerie Humphrey , Clerical Technician SUBJECT : Weekend and Evening Transit Service DATE: October 16 , 1987 Recommendation : Staff recommends that weekend and evening taxi service is not cost effective and should not be implemented at this time . - Background: Council has previously requested that staff investigate the possibility of providing a weekend ''Taxi Service'' to the citizens of Atascadero . Staff has received requests for expanded transit services . Included in this report is a petition from some of the residents at California Manor requesting service one evening a week and Saturdays Mlany of the requests received mention a desire to attend church on Sunday , therefore this report addresses Saturday and Sunday service along with a per—evening cost for evening service . In this study we have fccused on three scenarios and their cost to implement . Tie scenarios are detailed below and include comments and applicable costs . Discussion : Community Transit Ser rices have been contacted regarding the possibility of adding a weekend service . They feel that this can be accomplished within the current scope of their contact with an "out of contract" agreement at the established hourly rate plus 10" . • Scenario ffi - C'ne Bus , Driver , and Dispatcher In this scenario the system would work much like it does during the .,reek. There would be a dispatcher on duty in the office and one bus with driver available for service on an on-call basis . This alternative would be the least complicated as it is the same system riders have become familiar with during the week . However , the cost of providing this service in relation to the number of riders anticipated on the weekend and evenings would be high . Cost Breakdown : Dispatcher and Driver $ 15 . 30/hour Bus - fuel and maint . 20 . 00/hour TOTAL 35 . 30/hour WEEKEND SERVICE: 8 hrs per day X $35 . 30 X 2 days = 5564 . 80 5564 . 80 X 52 = 529 , 369 . 60 per year EVENING SERVICE (per evening) : (6 p .m. to 10 p .m.) 4 hrs per evening X $35 . 30 = $141 .20 1 evening per week X 52 = 57 , 342 .40 per year _Scenario #2 - Bus Driver - Mobile Phone This alternative would utilize one bus and driver and require the purchase and installation of a mobile telephone . This system would save the cost of the dispatcher . The driver would be required to stay in the bus , except during breaks , to monitor the phone . Customers would be given a separate number to call on weekends for service . Cost Breakdown : Driver $ 7 . 65/hour Bus - fuel , maint . 20 . 00/hour TOTAL 27 . 65 • r WEEKEND SERVICE: 8 hrs per day X $27 . 65 X 2 days = $442 .40 $442 .40 X 52 = $23, 004 . 80 per year EVENING SERVICE (per evening as above) : 4 hrs per evening x $27 . 65 = $110 . 60 1 evening per week X 52 = $5 ,751 .20 per year Mobile Phone - purchase $1700 . 00 Monthly Service Charge $ 40 . 00+ EXAMPLE: Weekend and 1 Evening Service lst Year Cost - $30 . 936 . 00 2nd Year Cost - $29 ,236 . 00 - Scenario-#3 - Advance Reservation Service Service can be provided on an advance reservation • bads . Under this system, riders would call any time during the week to schedule rides on the weekend. This alternative would be the easiest to implement on a trial basis as it does not involve the purchase of additional equipment and can operate the most economically . However , conflict is anticipated at high use times as when several people want to be a different churches at the same time . In this instance the schedule and route may be unsatisfactory , If no rides were booked during the week there would be no cost for that weekend or evening. If only a small number of rides were requested, the driver could be guaranteed a minimum day , say 4 hours , and charge each additional :lour to the nearest half hour . The charge for the bus , of tour- would be Lased on actual time in service . Cost of Driver $ 7 . 65,"k_our Bus , fuel , maint . 20 . 00/hour TOTAL $27 . 65/hour Cost for driver if no reservations = $0 Minimum cost for driver =$30 . 60/4 hours Maximum cost for driver =$61 . 30/8 hours Cost for bus - actual service time Minimum cost for bus = $0 Maximum cost for bus = $160 . 00/8 hours • • EXAMPLE: Weekend and One Eveni nix Service Minimum cost per year $0 (:no request for service) Maximum cost per year $28 ,756 . 00 Existing Service : The cost and availability of conventional taxi service has been researched and found to be available from Paso Robles Cab or San Luis Yellow Cab . The standard taxi rate is $4 . 00 for the first mile and $2 . 00 for each additional mile . The customer is charged only for the miles between pick-up and delivery and not for transit miles for the cab between cities . As an example : an average round trip from the south city limits to Williams Brothers and back would cost approximately $14 . 00 . FISCAL IMPACT : Since additional service was not budgeted for under the LTF/STA transit funds , it would be necessary to fund this service using LTF/STA funds previously slated for street maintenance programs . (about $25 , 000 or 1 mile of resurfacing) If it is determined that this service should continue past a trial period, funds could be included in the Community Transit Contract and budgeted for the 1988/89 fiscal year . It is important to note, however, that in order to qualify for LTF/STA Transit Fund: we are required to collect a minimum of 13% of our expenses in farebox revenues . It is possible that if we elect to provide weekend and evening service at a heavily subsidized cost per ride ratio that we could possibly fall below the 13% level required and therefore , be forced to raise overall rates about 2590 or to $1 . 00 . It is possible that a special fare could be established for weekend and evening service to help defray the cost subsidy . Ridership may be approximately assumed at a maximum of 16 individual calls per day (orae every 1/2 hour .) . The cost per ride, therefore , would be about $15 . 00 per customer . r MEMORANDUM TO: City Council THROUGH: Mike Shelton, City Manager FROM: Paul Sensibaugh, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Dial-A-Ride - ProDosed- 1986/87 Contract Renewal and Consideration of Service Expansion DATE: April 14, 1986 Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Dial-A-Ride contract be renewed with Community Transit Services, Inc. of Santa Ana and that a contract be brought back at a future meeting prior to July 1, and that the level of service by maintained equal or better without expanding services. Background and Discussion: Staff has had inquiries from citizens and council regarding the possibility of expanding the Dial-a-Ride Service to Weekends and/or evenings. Michael Moore, Location Supervisor for CTS has addressed these suggestions in the attached memo. The key points to the memo are; (1) DAR programs do better in this size of community than do fixed route systems, (2) There has not been a strong public desire to expand the service, (3) since revenue allocations are anticipated to decline in the near future, expanded services would most likely be short-lived, and (4) the cost would be approximately $10,000 to run one DAR bus for 8 hours on Saturdays. Staff would like to add that the expanded service, while desirable, would (1) reduce the amount of street resurfacing funds, (2) be difficult to pattern congruent with Atascadero' s spaghetti-like street layout, (3) involve a 2-hour trip to traverse El Camino Real North to South and to the Zoo and back, (4) be under utilized to key points of interest since those in the workplace provide their own mode of transportation and do not generally walk, (5) be needed mainly at the lunch break when the people scatter beyond the grasp of any flexible schedule we could conjur up, and (6) not enhance the needs of the handicapped or elderly (which make up over 60% of the ridership) or school children (which, for the most part, make up the balance) . Mr. Moore ' s memo addressed the need for new buses, saying that three of the five have an excess of 100, 000 miles. Two buses will be replaced in the 1986-87 budget and a third is anticipated in the following fiscal year . The oldest at that time will be a 1984 model. Ik According to the report there is a greater demand than we can accommodate between the hours of 2 PM and 4 PM, and a fourth bus on the road during that period is proposed at the cost of about $21,000 including the adjustment to the transit schedule. Staff agrees with that need, but recognizes the lack of demand for three buses at around 10 AM and 5 PM. (See attahced monthly management report) We, therefore, suggest an adjustment to the proposed time routing chart at no additional cost. The tie to the North Coast Transit would be acknowledged as well. 6:30 10 :30 4 7:30----9 : 00 1. 5 7: 45 12:45 5 10: 30 3: 30 5 11:00 4:00 5 12: 30 4: 30 4 2:30 6:30 4 28.5 The driver of the 10:30 AM to 3 : 30 PM 5 hour shift could take over the 7:30 AM to 9 : 00 AM shift and still be a part-time employee Six (6) drivers would be needed therefore instead of the current seven (7) . Most other hours would still enjoy 3 buses on the road, while transitioning from the light and heavy demand periods. Fiscal Impact: The recommended contract is 6. 5% greater than the previous year , mainly due to a requested $0. 25/hr hike in wages and another jolt in insurance services (incidently, the company has an excellent accident- mileage ratio) . The increase will be a direct reduction in SB325 funds that subsidize the street reconstruction program. It is anticipated the lower gasoline costs will offset this increase. It is further anticipated that since the gasoline tax is not a per- centage, that gas tax revenue may increase due to a greater con- sumption of gasoline across the state, because of the lower gasoline prices. 2 �f • MEMORANDUM TO: Paul Sensibaugh FILE: Atascadero Director of Public Works DATE: March 20, 1986 City of Atascadero FROM: Michael Moore Location Supervisor Atascadero Dial-A-Ride SUBJECT: 1985-86 Contract 0_� I-2Waf - .rn6 . S The tentative estimate for the 1986-87 contract year is $157,279,00. This reflects the same level of service for the 1985-86 contract period. This estimate includes a raise for all employees of $.25 per hour ($4.25 starting salary) . Insurance costs have increased more than 50% to $16,175.00. This also is only an estimate, as final insurance costs will not be available until June. If this estimate proves high the balance will be returned to the City. (Community Transit Services underestimated the 85-86 cost by $1,417.00 which was absorbed by the company. ) In figrring the cost of an expansion in service 22.00 Y P ce an estimated cost of $ per flour should give a reasonably accurate figure i.e. 5 hours X 52 Saturdays X $22. 00 x $5,720.00) to add to the base con- tract price. In expanding service it would be wise to consider the following factors. First, it is almost certain that costs in the future will increase: This year ' s contract has increased 6.7% over last year ' s; also, as the fleet gets older maintenance costs will rise (3 of the 5 buses have in excess of 10G,000 0 miles) Although falling gas prices should ameliorate these costs for now. Second, transit subsidies will be declining. Section 18 funds are anticipated to decline 15% - 30% in fiscal year 1987 and their complete phaseout is expected in the next few years. It would be prudent to begin now to establish a tran- sit vehicle replacement fund. The cost of a lift-equipt vehicle is currently around $35 ,000. 00. Third, it is now relatively easy to add service; it will be in the future much more difficult to reduce the level of service to which the community has become accustomed. In considering weekend service it should be pointed out that while bus service would be wonderful it has not been declared an unmet need because most stores and services are available Monday through Friday. It could be argued that the need for transportation on Sun- days to and from church should be and is largely being met by the churches themselves. Morro Bay Dial-A-Ride has discontinued Sunday service because of a lack of ridership. r X11 ` I would only operate for nine months starting in September of 1986. would be expensive = 190 days X 5 hours X $22.00 L- $20,900. 40 It is evident that while requests for increased -service are infinite the funds available are finite. It would be prudent to begin now to consider long range plans about future costs, funding and the principals that will guide transportation services for the City of Atascadero in the coming years. xc: -Mike Shelton Don Leib • 3 �i VEHICLE INSURANCE COST SUMMARY u t Y Type of Vehicle # --------------------- ------------------------------------------ V�1ue Total - za k%t x Wayne Transet t e 1981 2 $8, 767 $17, 534 i f sem, Bluebird 198111, 37J � 11, 37J � 1 Chrysler Wide One 1984 1 23, 288 23, 188 Chrysler, Wide;:' One 1979 #t 1 ..9, 000 9, �Z+00 ,r� YJ ---------- (--- ------- � ------------ ----------------- yw �] ------------------------------ I tsYt. _ TOTAL FLEET VALUE X61 097 s } for Prop ty Darn Ins 3. 60% 3 k ?. TOTAL PROPERTY DAMAGE PREMIUM `, Rate }ger mi le $0. 12 per mi le TOTAL LIABILITY PREMIUM $13, 200 DEDUCTIBLE $0. 01 per mile $1, 100 TOTAL INSURANCE 'y - $16, 499 PROJECT: Atascadero BUDGET PERIOD 01-Jul-86 to 30-Jun-87 Prepared by: _ JLP Date: 17-Mar-86 3 October 1, 1987 •. F `t* w We, the undersigned, are in need of extended Dial-A-Ride 34 ; service . We need service on Saturdays and one night a week. t .; = SIGNATURES *f, F A 741 r t +. ti ff October 1, 1987 ` We, the undersigned, are in need of extended Dial-A-Ride " : service. We need service on Saturdays and one night a week. nit x SIGNATURES G=� eeo wuz. 04 ' 9-A �L 4 � . n r v ; P A October 1, 1987 - a 4 We, the undersigned, are in need of extended Dial-A-Ride4x +(I service. We need service on Saturdays and one night a week. �� ' SIGNATURESix� Ulf YV/l ¢¢3rt 5 X12 a s //./� 1 } • 1 S J. 't y� Y A Jam'' *b4 � a 33 MELTING AGENDA ITEM# • MEMORANDUM To: Board of Directors/Atascadero County Sanitation District Through: Michael Shelton, City Manager From: Paul M. Sensibaugh, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Subject : Award of TV-Monitoring of the Sanitary Sewer System Date: October 19, 1987 Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Board award the TV-Monitoring portion of the Inflow and Infiltration project to Eagle Cam of San Luis Obispo in the amount of $35, 640 or $0 . 25/foot to be applied to actual quantities . Backround: At the last regular meeting the Sewer Cleaning portion of the I&I project was awarded and at staff 's request no decision was made on the TV-Monitoring until comparison demonstrations could be undertaken. Discussion: TV-Monitoring was performed by the apparant low bidder and the second low bidder on a common sanitary sewer line . The second low bid (Cyclops) had more sophisticated equipment and frills and more experience than the low bidder. This bidder also had a color camera (which was not specified) and on screen graphics . The low bidder had a quality black and white camera and displayed a log format that was easier to follow than the second low. The inexperience of the low bidder is expected to be made up in enthusiam and willingness to serve at our discretion. After viewing both "dirty movies" and at least one "soap opera" staff has determined that the lowest responsible bid belongs to Eagle Cam Although not every aspect of the specifications were met, such as on screen graphics, the intent of the bid as spelled out in the specifications is clearly met by the low bidder. It should be noted that the specifications were patterned after the material obtained from the second low bidder and thus the intent was more important in our selection than the exact letter of the specifications . • Fiscal Impact : • The lowest and best bid is $35,640 or $0. 25/foot versus $44, 193. 60 or $0 .31/foot for the second low bid. The savings of the low bid over the second low bid is over $8, 500. The Engineer' s Estimate for the above work was $52,747 . 20 or $0 .37/foot . A complete bid summary is attached for your reference . •