HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 09/22/1987 •
AGENDA
ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL
CLOSED SESSION
FOURTH FLOOR ROTUNDA ROOM
CITY ADMINISTRATIONBUILDINGBUILDING
SEPTEMBER 22, 1987
6:00 P.M.
1 . LITIGATION KANG VERSUS CITY OF ATASCADERO
2. LABOR MATTERS:
• A. DEPARTMENT' HEADS
B. CITY MANAGER
C. CONFIDENTIAL EMPLOYEES
3. REAL ESTATE ACQUISITION
A. BENO' S
B. GUIDRY PROPERTY
•
4 �
'Ah!NG AGENDA
ssEM
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: City Council Members September 22 , 1987
FROM: Michael Shelton .
City Manager
SUBJECT : KANG VERSUS CITY OF ATASCADERO
------------------------------
Insurance Attorney Craig Mc Cullam has requested to
discuss with Council. further settlement authority for
the Kang lawsuit.
A second voluntary settlement conference was recently
held and plaintif attorney has reduced their demands ,
but are still above City authority.
MS :kv
i
C O N F I D E N T I A L
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: City Council Members August 25, 1987
FROM: Michael Shelton SAA
City Manager 11
SUBJECT POPOVICH AND KANG VOLUNTARY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
Per your closed session meeting, insurance attorneys and
Dave Jorgensen met in Oxnard on August 24th with defendent
Popovich and Kang attorneys for a voluntary settlement
conference. The following are the results from this meeting:
Popovich . . . . . . . . . . . .Settled at Council authority of $30,000
County placed an additional $5,000
Kang . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Not Settled - Settlement authority of
$40,000 was offered •
County placed an additional $5,000.
Defendent' s attorney came down to $75,000
Judge set liability at $65,000
In not settling with Kang, the suite will now go to trial.
Just prior to trial, there will be a mandatory settlement
conference. Much of attorney expenses in preparation for trial
will be incurred at this time. The mandatory trial will be
after September 17,1987, and due to preparation requirements,
wi-I not transpire until November or December .
MS:kv
File: Mlitgtn
cc: City Attorney
�lCETth AGENDA
�j
ATL ►tEM#�� ��
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: City Council Members September 22 , 1987
FROM: Michael Shelton
City Manager ••''��
SUBJECT: DEPARTMENT HEAD BENEFIT INCREASES FOR
-----------------------------------------
FISCAL—YEAR-1987/88
At the Council ' s last closed session, the attached memorandum
and recommendation, dated September 3 , 1987 , was reviewed by
Council . Council requested further cost data in analyzing
fiscal impact of proposed equity increases . Accordingly, the
attached spread sheet, prepared by the Accounting Supervisor
is proposed for your further consideration . The aggregate
additional cost for equity increase this fiscal year is
$4 , 285 or an additional 1 . 71% . A similar six-month phased
equity cost increase would transpire in fiscal year 1988/89 .
MS : kv
ATTACHMENT
•
r _
II� {
-13-
00 rt
T
OI
a
O
- -} °I - a .
4
II ° rF I r rj _ ; T
k, of T
Doi
m
i d~
I
r� 01
- - --{-- -�- -� --1_-
tXl I
+
y f R a rx' al o 00 00 a,
m
vi
m RS
_
r �
i n
N I
—F t -I--- _ F00f-
I
00
�! IIS-
r of O a o
ml cn. of d°I O C�vo., flS cZS
Z
d o.-
rc
00
a-
m
00
dl
L m -� �t
Ih
td
rot I I 1
I
CO
+ a RSI
a o
� �9 rti'I r � � I
f 6i
0
a I Q
September 3, 1987
To: City Council Members
From: Mike Shelton
Subject: Dept. Head Salary and Benefit Increases for F.Y. 87-88
Discussion:
Attached is a memo from Dept. Heads making known their desires
regarding salaries and benefits for Fiscal Year 1987-88. Summarized,
the department heads are requesting:
1. ) Cost of living increases - equal to that given to the
Police Officers. (or any group that may receive a higher
increase.)
2. ) Equity adjustment: - phased over 2 year period, bringing
Dept. heads up to second highest in the County. First
year will bring Dept. heads to average. Second year will
bring department heads up to second highest in County.
3. ) A two year agreement is proposed where Dept. heads will
get increases equal to the highest increase given to
other employer groups, effective July 4, 1988.
4. ) One time annual payment of $800. 00 to all Dept. heads to
be used at disgression for one or more identified .benefits.
Recommendation:
1. ) Cost of living increases: - I recommend Dept. Heads re-
ceive salary increases equal to that of mid-manager or
2. 75% July and 3. 25% January (assuming ratification) .
2. ) Equity Adjustment: - I recommend Dept. heads receive
equity adjustment equal to County average. Adjustment
to be phased over 2 years with one half paid January 1,
1988, and one half paid January 1, 1989 .
3. ) Coucil provides $200. cafeteria benefit contribution to
be used at employee disgression in Fiscal Year. 1987-88
increased to $400. 00 beginning July 1, 1988 for Fiscal
Year 1988-89. Use of cafeteria benefit contributions
to be limited to following use:
a. ) Dues and fees for civic club membership
b. ) Vision insurance
c. ) Additional hours administrative leave
d. ) Annual Physical
e. ) Tuition and books for University courses.
f. ) Contribution to deferred compensation program for
City employees. *
* Previously requested by Dept. heads prior to
attached memo.
Page 2
4. ) Department heads receive increase equal to the highest
increase given to other employer groups, effective July 4,
,1988. (second year)
Cost (excluding individual equity adjustments)
Fiscal Year 1987-88 Salary Increases 4. 375% 4,
$200. 00 cafeteria benefit .482%
q.9 0
Total 4. 857
Council Authority 4. 85
Equity Adjustments
Equity adjustment to bring Dept. heads up to County
average is recommended as follows:
% deficient (7-1-87) - 1/88 1/89
Admin. Services Director 11. 68 5. 84 5. 84
Community Dev. Director 8. 89 4. 48 4. 45
Parks & Recreation Director 9. 63 4. 82 4. 82
Police Cheif 10. 94 5. 47 5. 47
City to pay increased premium cost for employee and
dependent health, dental and life insurance.
(negotiated in previous fiscal year) .
az
August 31, 1987
Mike Shelton
City Manager
City of Atascadero
P. O. Box 747
Atascadero, CA 93423
Dear Mike:
We, the undersigned Department Heads for the City of
Atascadero, make the following recommendations concerning our
salaries and benefits:
Salaries
1. Department Heads will receive an increase equal to the
highest increase given to other employee groups, effec-
tive July 4, 1987 .
2. Equity Adjustment - According to recent survey data the
Department Heads are significantly below the average
salary for similar positions in San Luis Obispo County.
We feel that this inequity should be eliminated. We also
recognize that all of these adjustments can' t be made at
one time. We are therefore recommending a two (2) year
program for making these equity adjustments. The first
year will be designed to bring each department head' s
salary to the average of his position in the County. The
second year will be to bring each department head' s
salary up midway between the highest salary and second
highest salary for a similar position in the County.
3. With the above in mind, we propose that:
a. 1/2 of the percentage to bring a department head up
to the average be applied to the current salary
effective July 4 , 1987.
b. 1/2 of the percentage to the average January 1, 1988.
c. 1/2 of the percentage to bring a department head up
to midway between the highest and second highest salary
for a similar position in the County effective July 1,
1988.
d. 1/2 of percentage to midpoint - January 1, 1989.
4. Department heads will receive an increase equal to the
highest increase given to other employee groups, effective
July 4, 1988.
• •
Letter to Mike Shelton
August 31, 1987 is
Page two
This in essence represents a two-year proposal for dealing with
department head salaries.
Benefits
We would like to see a cafeteria plan offered for the depart-
ment heads. Each department head would be given $800. 00 per year
to be used to select one or a combination of benefits from the
following list:
1. Vision Insurance - Approximate cost - $60. 00/$160.00 per year .
2. Orthodontia Insurance - Approximate cost - Unknown.
3. 40 additional hours administrative leave - Approximate
cost - $800. 00.
4. PERS- Conversion to highest last salary for retirement
Approximate cost - Unknown.
5. PERS - Conversion of sick leave at retirement - Approximate
cost - Unknown.
6. Annuity Program - Approximate cost - Variable.
7 . Long Term Disability Program Approximate cost - Unknown.
If you or the Council have any questions regarding anything in
this letter, please let us know.
Sincerely,
Bob Best DavidG. orjgensen
Henry Engem A Richard McHale
ON
Mike Hicks Paul Sensibaugh �/
U > >4
(n N 1.1 �4
>, u1 �4 m v N v
.I-- N (0 >r C14 --1 04
a
Yr U C3 C ''O t~
x IH o O
w ro o o -)
0 C 04 -1-1
U ro :3 > U ro U ro
> >
WO !!1 (P N ca (n
• U N U
U Cu r I rX4
w v > U S 4 to
a > �4cn 1 sow
v U
H 4J Ln w N r) U I Q �G v C U ri v +J +J +J U
x U v I-1 -rl +� N E 3 - E a Q > o N a
w z o Q v)- U o v o > E Q m 10 v U r 1 -+ � v
z ox 3 -+ •, r1
\ 3 N S4 m y N a i N� w w �U U U a a U I +1 U a F:4 Q U
0 0 cn• > V}E-1 4r-1 W V? a .14 U JJ v
Ln Ln o .,~ O m m a) (n o Ln
a s d-J v �4 r I Sa p 1— N Ln v 0 \ v rl N O r- v
�C �C U O x O U ro O U U H > M a i w N N e••i >
w
U. UlU
N
!n U)
z w o : o
a 0 a4
O u O 0
<
U
E-1i U dp
ow -l1 0p -H -�
1 O
O Oa O 04
U) ca ro Q4-� 12) ro ro s� Q � ro
H Z \ Ei -H Ei E-1 (0 \
LlH G a a U G s~ u (n C
U) +
z
H
00 O O
O O O O 00 0 U O
w ro 0 0 O O
W 0 O
H \ O �Y' tf) Ln C
a C O N O O
N if1 do
> O
wv dp
> w v -ri ON
C 3 p Ca
o G�
4J
a O m H � La W
O " Q � 4�1
.
U H chi)- U MO 0 v U U 1 U U
Q w 04 a rO 00 o r io o n o 0\0 �--•
w x E v v O r- o ro o \ O .0 o 0 .�
2: a4 wra E N u � ,� 04Ha H a,
o
x
H
0w>4 Q as w w
oz (� � >, oa 2: u ° (np
z a � a 1 H I � 0 H W 0 h
1 U (A O C) U a C4 a CQ CQ �C
i
r-i
00 01
r.
\ x O 4-1 l0 cy) H -H -q O O rO In � �
00 U O O N (N U) -r-I1-4 r-I \dP
`
0 H Ul 1J \ 'z) d-) M M M '1/) .lam d' `•O
d \
-H N 41
C 3
v
ld a1
� C
0 C: O r- 44
r-4 1010 0 Li U a1
dp
w lu-i O "o NO U LnT� , \ U U
\ \meq k a�
x O 6l � LC; 7 LO M GP 1 N .,I r-:
H
U a M 0 M \ o { �.o ro o a)
t7' IT a) Ei 'o
U) a)
a) �4
}A . .r1
CL rO C:
OrxEn
zW 7 �' a
�O (� -i M
OO \ O O P \ \� \ Q4C0
0 --� U) .Q] Q
M O M� N a1 >1O
Q d' M � >
M N d-i is U)
ri •r-I
vna
�+ Ga
o u a 44 _ IS ro
G Q m
a tin Q o o m co x � ^ ^ ?- � �,� .a u
0 0 * 0 �4 -H ° �o � �) � `" " „ pro +)
U2 O C 'V "T co 61 r-I ri d' •.-i ti -rl t:<1 `:N O r fa (a
W H d m m \ \ a - Q O \ : �� N Q Q M H
a E M O O . '-� 61 M Q N Ltl.. U? O
H Q •ri M O O CP M�-,..I M N C
Q � w M > �' Awa -H 3
;,n an Ga Ga In O +)
ro a) w
> A O
>44-3
^
0 4) tea) fZ
Ga O{' i0 w 'x
0 \
> >, °i O U q 00
b M \, M
\da
�-O O
W \ M In Q
a Si 00
0 Lf) O LO ri> a) is \p O
M.� �. M I
a O :1 -H v v rNi S� ami o
Qu U 44 t7' M 0 ri N
44 Qa (11
m a 3.
O aY,< O) O tea)
0 �l N. p p r U) U)
a m _ is m �
O 3 „O +) 00 fT N V y4 a N
U H O m u7 N I U [� 6l W
O O i CO C7' N m dP a) O S4
a2 a O \ (a O > M � \0 N 00 .a C :5!Z m tet' O ) N "i 'q �4a) d'\ V'�. d' I •�
Q a v O ,-i U C O 4 i
II v U) -H r-i
U Qa ,Q O
a) O
4-) a)
r w U) .c
H 4-)
0: y^o rte( `
a a�
U 0:) v zs ° 3' +da a u
E o ao G x
ro -�,
� O N l0 ` �(,' J-i {.' r-i l0 C N Cr
4-1
Ei I'D O k 00
7' d O `r �M _ �.i N
U O m O \-H U) N a) a) [t' -}. -ri W a)
co o o U a Q
oo s4 U
ri . m
a —(1) m .c
w ro O 04 U
Q
n O C
H O O M C4 O to O T < :3 •-) 4-) a)
ko
a H � w 00 o w r o o I` o o 00 o ro U \ m U> o z x UCO O 00 O !4 to S4 >Y H
O o q R o \ Qa Lfa aar Q \E4 Z 04 \ � \ -iH L4 O I- O
Z H I` O V a O 110 O u') H W l0 O U 0 0 > E- > C ,L-' O
U U H Qa cn o 00 Q,00 U U 00 04 H a a m a r, a a CD Qa �.o w 00 Q, .-+ (a < 0 0 E-+ a
"IEE_ ^ AG7NDA
DAT ITEM
• M E M O R A N D U M
TO: City Council Members September 22, 1987
FROM: Michael Shelton
City Manager
SUBJECT: COMPENSATION FOR CONFIDENTIAL EMPLOYEES
CITY MANAGER' S SECRETARY, PERSONNEL SPECIALIST,
AND ACCOUNTING SUPERVISOR
RECOMMENDATION:
1. The City Manager ' s Secretary and Personnel Specialist receive
the same benefits as given to S.E.I .U. Clerical plus a 5%
confidential status differential placed over two (2) fiscal
years (see attached worksheet) .
2. The Accounting Supervisor receive the same benefits given to
Mid-Management/Professional Unit employees.
• DISCUSSION:
Under the current State law and the City' s Personnel Rules and
Regulations, .certain employees privileged to confidential "meet
and confer" information are classified as confidential, and are
prohibited from belonging to a formal bargaining unit.
Since confidential employees are not able to input and partic-
ipate in the meet and confer process, it is common in most cities
to provide a "differential" to employees so designated. The
attached survey shows how confidential employees are compensated
in other cities in the county. Though not all cities provide a
confidential differential, most cities provide additional pay
and/or additional benefits (management) to confidential
employees.
The City Manager ' s Secretary and Personnel Specialist, if not
classified confidential, would belong to the S.E. I.U. Clerical
Bargaining Unit. Employees in this unit, as are these confi-
dential employees, are entitled to overtime compensation.
The employees in the Mid-Management/Confidential Unit receive
additional benefits in lieu of overtime compensation. Accord-
ingly, I am not inclined to recommend the Mid-Management/
Confidential benefits. I do believe, however , that a 5% confi-
dential differential is appropriate, and so recommended in
addition to this year ' s S.E. I.U. package.
Phasing of the 5% confidential differential is recommended as
follows:
January 1, 1988 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-1/2%
July 1, 198 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2-1/2%
I have discussed these recommendations with the affected
employees, the Administrative Services Director and Don Becker,
who are in agreement with recommendations.
Attached is a cost analysis of the recommendation. The proposal
is for a two fiscal year period.
The Accounting Supervisor position, if not classified
confidential, would belong -to the Mid-Management/Professional
Bargaining Unit. Accordingly, the Accounting Supervisor will
enjoy the additional benefits and administrative leave provided
to this unit. Therefore, I am not recommending a pay differ-
ential for this position, at this time.
ALTERNATIVE:
Council may wish to implement the 5% confidential compensation
effective July 1, 1987 (see attached worksheet) .
MS:kv
File: MConemp
Attachments: county-wide compensation survey
cost analysis for proposed compensation
•
M E M O R A N D U M
To: Mike Shelton
From: Karen Vaughan
Alicia Lara,
Date: September 16, 1987
Subject: Confidential Employee Differential
Per your request, we have conducted a brief survey of the
cities within our County to determine if they recognize confi-
dential employees and if these employees are in fact compensated
for being Confidential.
The results of our survey are in the attached chart which
shows the cities within the County and their present practice.
We have discussed the various practices other cities use to
compensate their Confidential Employees and have come up with
what we feel is an equitable idea.
We feel that a 5% differential for Confidential Employees is
fair . After our discussion regarding this subject, we costed
out your suggested implementation dates. Attached is a cost sheet
showing the proposed implementation schedule.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
amemo 420456
•
SALARY DIFFERENTIAL WORKSHEET
0
Proposed_Recommendation
--- --------------
Effective_January_2 , _1988 :
--------- ------ ----
Personnel Specialist @ E Step - $1., 903 . 55
Plus 2-1/2% ( for confidential ) - Cost 1/88 thru 6/88 . . . . . $285 . 54
Administrative Secretary II @ E Step - $1 , 949 . 99
Plus 2-1/2% ( for confidential - Cost 1/88 thru 6/88. . . . . . $292 . 50
Total cost impact for both positions for F. Y. 1987/88 . . . . . . . . $578 . 04
Effective 7/2/88
Additional 2-1/2% over CPI for Confidential .
Cost unknown at this time , as it is tied to CPI .
0
ALTERNATIVE
Effective July 4, 198.7 ;
Personnel Specialist @ E Step
5% ( for confidential compensation ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $561 . 04
Administrative Secretary II @ D Step - 6 Months
and E Step - 6 Months
5% ( for confidential compensation ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $565. 62
Total cost impact for both positions for F.Y. 1987/88 . . . . . . . . $1 , 126 . 66
0
0
� •ro
a
0 fa
ca
c� o
ca
E 4-3 U
+-
•r-4 Ir--i ca -C 41 (1)4-1 -o ro H r I co E
U) +� C r. r- 000
caa G N b V 0.G ca
c
r-I •r•I b •H E ro
G >, 4-) w 0 o
:3 4-) U) q 0
Uu4� °
-d
>" E U0] >1 O
a E ro N a 0 n 4-3 .0
C: •r•I C. ro
w "0 00-c4 4-I t� �, a)
I rl m > > v o 4J
w >, a) m o o
W > U O U N � �
O \ 0
In
$4 �4 Z —1 1 1 ca 4-) ro O n
0
4-J t~ ro H
4J r-1 U)
a� a a.
U a)
> > 3 a� 44 ro
, � O > +�
ro 0 r-A U) rl W
ro O G
ca cU r-I U +•1 U a)
a
+� -W N ro .Q � O a) i
U1 $-i U) O l� •r-i 4-4
E :� U) s. lj +) G
G G
v t~ a cau r~ v �°�
. +) •r I iJ r I •ri 00
H r° ,� Ui �n U) ca o a
w ro co 0 U)CO � c ro a ro ro ro 00
O r0-I N r0I ca -0 3 O 00 r q G Z G z .0 '0
b b
4-)O
U) 0 O N ro
JJ 4••1 4 JJ -W
.r{ 0
ri U) U) O O
0 0 U U
U> U)
a
ca co
Z I I I C� ri �
a
O N U) N L Q) u) N U) 41 �
0 >, >' >, 0 >, O �, ( Q)
w Q q
4-4 4-4
0 0
•� C ri
H �4 >1 I-4
U O O O
•r'7'--4 •n
M ro ri) U) ul U) m m ro P. ro
Q) a) a) a) a) a) (1) a) E E E
•�, >, >, >, >, >> ul
x
>-4 4
H ca CO c
U
+,
r-{
OFO< O —I 0 W U O c o N •ro0
c7o> o o > o a o -< o W o u �ai
.N z WLf) An� F-I00m0 0 ovi �
r-+ W r-i N -d
w o a0 a o a o. a�
04 o -1 °a. N o o W O o H O Ei o +-) o 4
F-i U H
r
WVEETNG AGE?4DA
Azo (TEM
M E M O R A N D U M
TO : City Council Members September 22 , 1987
FROM: Michael Shelton 4fl�f
City Manager
SUBJECT: ATASCADERO LAKE PARK PROPERTY AC UISITION -
GUIDRY—PROPERTY
RECOMMENDATION :
Council authorizes the Lake Park Acquisition Committee to
negotiate property acquisitions in accordance with the
attached financing plan. The attached plan provides for
acquisition of desired property within current City
resources .
DISCUSSION :
. City Parks and Recreation Commission has recommended
to surplus Sycamore Road end 11.1raffic Way properties .
The Traffic Way property will be presented to the
Planning Commission at their October 6, 1987 meeting
(City application ) for zone change to light industrial .
The property appraisal for all affected properties has
been approved by Council and are expected late this month .
MS : kv
Attachment
ATASCADERO LAKE PARK
PROPERTY ACQUISITON
(Phil and Shirlev Guidry Property)
AD HOC COMMITTEE
GUIDRY PROPOSAL TO CITY RECOMMENDATION
1. Estimated Value $107, 000 1. Acquire house parcel lot
Outstanding Loan 52,600 subject to sale or ex-
change of two Traffic
$ 54 ,400 Way lots
Proposal:
A. Trade house equity for
Santa Rosa lot*
B. City pay off outstanding
loan
* If house equity exceeds
appraisal value, City
pays difference
2. Trade 2 vacant lots (lots 2. Acquire two vacant lots
4 & 30) for City' s Traffic Way (4 & 30) subject to
lot City' s sale of the
Traffic Way lot
3. Pay cash for 1 lot @ $60 , 000 3 . Agree
(lot #5)
4. Lease for 2 years at prime 4. Hold off, possibly
rate + 1% one lot (lot #29) acquire through surplus
Pay for ($60,000) in F.Y. lot value & City cash
1989/90 position.
City to expedite Traffic
Way Lot Zone Change and
push for quick appraisal
completion.
File: Matasla6
SCHE BERG . , TAYLOR,
MCCORMICK & JECKER
Y C O R P O R A T
F o Real Estate A`praiscrs. Consultants and Investment Analysis
August 28, 1987
Mr. Bob Best , Director
Parks and Recreation
City of Atascadero
P. 0. Box 747
Atascadero, CA 93423
RE: Land appraisals for the city
Dear Mr. Best :
This is to confirm our meeting of about 1 1 /2 weeks ago ,
regarding our firm appraising those lots in the city of Atas-
cadero , as outlined in the memo dated August 13, 1987, from you
to the City Council.
As I indicated at the time , I am very heavily scheduled . How-
ever , I will start one of my associates on the project -next
week . With any luck at all, we should have it completed within
2 weeks . However, if everything goes awry, as it sometimes
does , it will take about 3 weeks .
I hope this meets with your approval.
If you Gave any further questions, or additional information
that you feel would be of assistance , please give me a call.
Sincerely,
Richard L. Schenberger
1306 HIGUERA STREET • SAN LUIS OBISPO • CALIFORNIA • 93401 • (805) 544.2472
ADMINISTRATION BUILDING Y�
POST OFFICE BOX 747
ATASCADERO. CALIFORNIA 93423
PHONE: (805) 466-8000 POLICE DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE BOX 747
ATASCADERO. CALIFORNIA 93423
CITY CLERK
CITY COUNCIL �A � ��® PHONE: (805) 466-8600
vQ ,
CITY TREASURER A »�
CITY MANAGER INCORPORATED JULY 2. 1979
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 6005 LEWIS AVENUEATASCADERO.CALIFORNIA 93422
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT PHONE: (805) 466-2141
w
September 9, 1987
Mr. and Mrs. Phil Guidry
Post Office Box 295
Littlerock, California 93543
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Guidry:
The following is a short note to keep you advised on recent City
efforts.
Attached is a letter from Schenberger , Taylor , Mc Cormick, and
Jeckner, responding to our request to expedite the appraisals.
Based on this letter , we expect to have the appraisals by the
last week in September.
Also, efforts are underway to surplus City-owned properties.
Very truly yours,
;CG k'Rj�-
Michael B. Shelton
City Manager
MS :kv
File : MATASLA5
CC: City Council
Park/Recreation Director
(REVISED)/G U
• NOTE: THERE WILL BE A CLOSED COUNCIL SESSION AT 6 :00 P.M.
IN THE ADMINISTRATION BUILDING FOURTH FLOOR CLUB ROOM
REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONS (MANAGEMENT & CONFIDENTIAL)
REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATIONS (ATASCADERO LAKE PROPERTIES
- GUIDRY AND BENO'S) AND LITIGaTTON MATTERS
(KANG VERSUS CITY OF ATASCADERO)
A G E N D A
ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
ATASCADERO ADMINISTRATION BUILDING
FOURTH FLOOR, ROTUNDA ROOM
SEPTEMBER 22, 1987
7:30 P. M.
RULES OF PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
* Members of the audience may speak on any item on the agenda.
• * A person may speak for five (5) minutes.
* No one may speak for a 'second time until everyone wishing to
speak has had an opportunity to do so.
* No one may speak more than twice on any item.
* Council members may question any speaker ; the speaker may
respond; but after the alloted time has expired, may not
initiate further discussion.
* The floor will then be closed to public participation and open
for Council discussion.
Call to Order
Pledge of Allegiance
Roll Call
Invocation - Pastor Phillip W. Sievers, Lutheran Church of the
Redeemer
* New Employee Introduction: Harry Parsi, Senior Civil Engineer,
Cynthia Reid, Police Officer, and Brett Morris, Police Officer
* Proclamation of Appreciation for Outstanding Fire Protection
Services on the Los Altos Fire
City Council Comment
Committee Reports - (The following represent Ad Hoc or Standing
Committees. Informative status reports will be given, as felt
necessary.
1
• 1. City/School Committee 6. Equal Opportunity Commission
2. North Coastal Transit 7. Police Facility Committee
3. San Luis Obispo Area 8. Atascadero Lake Acquistion
Coordinating Council Committee
4. Traffic Committee 9. Tree Committee
5. Solid Waste Mgmt Committee 10. Bicentennial Committee
(Approximate Time - 30 Minutes)
COMMUNITY FORUM
The City Council values and encourages exchange of ideas and
comments from you the citizen. The public comment period is provided
to receive comments from the public on matters other than scheduled
agenda items. To increase the effectiveness of Community Forum, the
following rules will be enforced:
* A maximum of 30 minutes will be allowed for Community Forum,
unless Council authorizes an extension.
* All remarks shall be addressed to Council as a whole and not to
any individual member thereof.
* No questions shall be asked of a Council Member or City staff
without permission of the Mayor.
* No person shall be allowed to make slanderous, profane,
impertinent, or personal remarks against any Council Member
or member of the City staff.
* Any person desiring to submit written statements may do so by
forwarding to Council, prior to the Council Meeting, nine (9)
copies to the City Clerk by 5 :00 p.m. on the Wednesday preceeding
the Council Meeting.
A. CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters listed under Item A, Consent Calendar, are considered to
be routine, and will be enacted by one motion in the form listed be-
low. There will be no separate discussion of these items. A member
of the Council or public may, by request, have any item removed from
the Consent Agenda, which shall be reviewed and acted upon separately
after the
adoption of the Consent Calendar .
1. Approval of City Council Minutes - August 25, 1987
2. Approval of City Council Minutes - September 8, 1987
3. Proclamation- Acknowledging October 4-10, 1987 as
"National Mental Illness Awareness Week"
4. Proclamation- Acknowledging "American Business Women" -
September 22, 1987
5. Resolution 102-87 - Authorization for Mayor to Enter into
Agreement with San Luis Obispo Area Coordinating Council
Joint Powers Agreement for Fiscal Year 1987/88
2
• 6. Denial of Claim by Erica Kip, et.al. - $25,000 — Personal
Damages
7. Approval of Tentative Parcel Map 23-87 - 11605 San Marcos Road -
Proposed Subdivision of 10. 55 Acres into Two Lots of 5.2 Acres
Each - Vaughan
8. Acceptance of Final Lot Line Adjustment 10-87 - 8435 Curbaril
Shearer/Volbrecht Surveys
9. Acceptance of Final Tract Map 30-86 - 8375 Amapoa - Salmeron/
Cuesta Engineering
10. Acceptance of City Treasurer ' s Report - August, 1987
11. Acceptance of City Finance Department Report - August, 1987
B. HEARINGS/APPEARANCES/REPORTS
(Approximate Time - 20 Minutes)
1. Zone Change 11-87 - 8485 El Corte - City of Atascadero
Initiated
• A. Public Hearing
B. Ordinance 158 - Reverting the Existing Zone Designation
of Residential Multiple Family with Planned
Development #6 to the Prior Zoning Designation of
Residential Single Family, 1. 5-2. 5 Acre Minimum Lot Size
(FIRST READING)
(Approximate Time - 40 Minutes)
2. General Plan Amendment 2A-87 and Zone Change 4-87 - 8500
El Dorado - Lindsey/Funk (Planning Commission Recommendation
for Denial)
A. Public Hearing
(Approximate Time - 5 Minutes)
3. Report on 20,000 Square Foot Lots and Flag Lot Concentrations
C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
(Approximate Time 5 Minutes)
1. Award of Park and Recreation Department Bid for
Utility Vehicle - Sam Ferrante Snider Hi Jet
• $8,218.18
3
(Approximate Time - 15 Minutes)
2. Award of Bid for Santa Ysabel Road Reconstruction -
M.S. Hemrick, Inc. - $129,167.10
D. NEW BUSINESS
(Approximate Time - 15 Minutes)
1. Resolution 101-87 - Proposal to Accept a Portion of Graves
Creek Road, from .Santa Ana to San Fernando, into the City
Maintained Street District
(Approximate Time - 5 Minutes)
2. Resolution 95-87 - Authorization for Appropriation of Funds
from Council Contingency Account for $5,000 Arson Reward
(Approximate Time - 10 Minutes)
3. Resolution 99-87 - Establishment of a Policy Statement for
Disadvantaged Business Enterprises and Establishment of a
Liaison Officer In Accordance with Federal Regulations
(Approximate Time - 5 Minutes)
4. Resolution 96-87 - Approval of Memorandum of Understanding
Between the City of Atascadero and the Atascadero Sergeants
• Service Organization - Fiscal Year 1987/88
(Approximate Time - 5 Minutes)
5. Resolution 97-87 - Adoption of Salary Classification Schedule
and Benefits for Mid Management/Professional Employees -
Fiscal Year 1987/88
(Approximate Time - 5 Minutes)
6. Resolution 98-87 - Amendment to the Memorandum of Understanding
Between the City of Atascadero and Local 817 Service Employees
International Union Atascadero Chaper Clerical Bargaining Unit
E. ATASCADERO SANITATION DISTRICT
(Council will recess and convene as the Atascadero County
Sanitation District Board of Directors)
(Approximate Time 10 Minutes)
1. Resolution 100-87 - Extension of Public Sewer Service to
Lot 214, Block NC (4525 Navidad) and Incorporating it
Into the Boundaries of Sanitation Improvement District #4
(The Board of Director will adjourn and reconvene as the
City Council)
•
4
! •
• F. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION
1. City Council
A. Revised City Council Meeting Setup
B. Request to Reconstitute the Contractor ' s
Committee (Norris)
2. City Attorney
3. City Clerk
4. City Treasurer
5. City Manager
NOTE: THIS MEETING WILL BE ADJOURNED TO A JOINT CITY COUNCIL/
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ON SEPTEMBER 24, 1987 AT
7:30 P.M. IN THE ADMINISTRATION BUILDING FOURTH FLOOR
CLUB ROOM
•
5
****PLEASE INCLUDE INTO _ f`C-'{,'"A
• 9/ ..
THE 9/22 COUNCIL AGENDA ®R!
PACKET**** -- —-
i
PROCLAMATION OF APPRECIATION
FOR EXPERTISE AND PROFESSIONALISM
BY THE
ATASCADERO FIRE DEPARTMENT
WHEREAS, on August 29, 1987 , the City experienced it' s
largest wildfire to date; and
WHEREAS, the fire burned 600 acres with an estimated 150
homes directly threatened, and the entire west side of the city
at one point looking as though it might become affected; and
WHEREAS, due to fire conditions, the fire ' escalated and
presented a condition of extreme peril to the safety of persons
and property within our City; and
WHEREAS, the fire began at 2:30 p.m. , and was fully contained
by 12: 00 midnight; and
WHEREAS, the City of Atascadero Fire Department responded to
• the scene with 5 engines and 30 full-time and reserve personnel
who moved from structure to structure providing protection from
the fire storm; and
WHEREAS, due to the City' s weed abatement program,
administered by the Fire Department, weeds were cut prior and
significantly reduced the potential of the fire; and
WHEREAS, automatic aid and mutual aid agreements were in
place and executed to bring to the aid of the City 25 additional
engines, 201 additional personnel, 6 bulldozers, 1 helicopter,
and 3 aircraft tankers; and
WHEREAS, the Fire Department' s pre-planning, state of
readiness, professionalism, hard work, and spirit of cooperation
resulted in the protection of lives and property within our City;
and
WHEREAS, there were no injuries, loss of life or structures
due to the fire.
•
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that the Atascadero City •
Council commends the expertise and professionalism of the
Atascadero Fire Department during this time of extreme emergency.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Atascadero
appreciates and personally thanks all members of the Fire
Department and reserve personnel for controlling what could
have been a major disaster in the City.
BARBARA NORRIS
Mayor
September 22,1987
•
•
****PLEASE INCLUDE INTO a
THE 9/22 COUNCIL AGENDA --�----
PACKET##*# —
I
• P R O C L A M A T I O N
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF
SEPTEMBER 22, 1987
AS
"AMERICAN BUSINESS WOMEN DAY"
WHEREAS, the American Business Womens , Association
was
founded in 1949, and;
WHEREAS, the mission of the American Business Womens
Association is to bring together business women of diverse
backgrounds, and to provide opportunities for them to help
themselves and others grow personally and professionally
through leadership, education, network support, and
national recognition.
THEREFORE, I, Barbara Norris, Mayor of the City of
Atascadero declare Septemer 22, 1987 as "American Business
Women Week" and acknowledge the local Chapter , Colony Charter
Chapter, within the City of Atascadero.
BARBARA NORRIS
Mayor
September 22,1987
•
AG_"IDA /J
ire',f O
i__
�?:1 X
•
ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL
MINUTES
AUGUST 25, 1987
Atascadero Administration Building
The regular meeting of the Atascadero City Council was called to
order at 7:30 p.m. by Mayor Norris
ROLL CALL
Present: Councilmembers Borgeson, Handshy, Mackey, Bourbeau, and
Mayor Norris
Reverend John Taylor, Church of Christ, gave the meeting ' s invo-
cation.
Regarding status on City Committees:
Traffic Committee: A meeting is scheduled for August 26th.
• Police Facility Committee: Appraisals on various facility sites
are presently being done. Results of appraisals and a site
analysis of Beno' s Store should be completed within three weeks.
Atascadero Lake Committee: Staff is presently negotiating with
eight property owners of lots around the lake for City acqui-
sition.
Tree Committee: The next meeting is scheduled for August 26th to
work on a City Tree Ordinance.
Bicentennial Committee: A meeting was held last week and the
bicentennial celebration is scheduled for September 19th in front
of the City Administration Building.
Mayor Norris states that prior to this regular Council Meeting,
the Council met in closed session regarding personnel matters,
and will reconvene at the end of the regular meeting, if pos-
sible, to continue discussions.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Tom Hatchell, Chamber of Commerce representative, speaks to a
proposal by Rex Hendrix to develop a site near Santa Barbara Road
• consisting of a care home and tourist oriented businesses. Mr.
Hendrix is withdrawing his application due to City requirements
related to an Environmental Impact Report.
1
i
Mayor Norris requests staff to further review requirements of the
Environmental Impact Report and whether staff versus applicant
should pick the consultant.
Joe Nyle, Atascadero resident, expresses his concerns on the City
utilizing taxpayers money to pay Borton, Patrini and Conron
$3,000 for the defense of Councilmember Handshy and previous
Mayor Nelson in a recent lawsuit.
Judy Mc Donald, River Gardens resident, discusses Salinas River
sand quarry operations in the Salinas River adjacent to her home.
She requests Council to further investigate quarrying operations
in the river , within city limits, related to land use, noise/dust
impacts, and allowed operating hours.
Henry Engen, Community Development Director, states that st:aff
has addressed this issue recently, will be meeting further with
residents in the area, and later presenting a report to Council.
Chris Anderson, Atascadero resident, states that a Paloma Creek
Park road, between the ball field and playgrounds, was open for
vehicular traffic while children were playing. She also feels
that alcoholic beverages are not appropriate at parks.
Bob Best, Parks and Recreation Director , states that alcoholic
beverages are not prohibited in parks under the current ordin-
ance. The road was open for sponsors to service a ball tourna-
ment on the date in question, but the road will be closed during
operating hours in the future.
Mayor Norris requests Council reconsideration of alcohol use in
public parks.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1. City Council Minutes - August 25 , 1987
2. Tentative Parcel Map 24-87 - 9122 Atascadero Ave Subdivision
of one Parcel of 1.433 Acres into Three Lots of 21,700 ,
20, 000, and 20 , 200 Square Feet Each O'Bannon/Cuesta
Engineering
3. Tentative Tract Map 13-87 - 8519 El Dorado Road - Proposed
Subdivision of Six Parcels Totaling 6. 81 Acres into Twelve
Lots Containing Approximately 20 ,000 Square Feet Each
Peterson Development Corp./Devencenzi
4. Denial of Proposed Lot Line Adjustment 13-87 - 7905 Marchant
Adjust the Property Line Between Two Existing Lots of Record
Kling/Cuesta Engineering
5. Acceptance of Final Tract Map 20-86 - 8305 Coromar -
Molina/Twin Cities Engineering
6. Proclamation - Acknowledgement of September 8, 1987 , as
"World Literacy Day"
7. Proclamation - Acknowledgement of September , October ,
November, and December, 1987, as "Good Neighbor Months"
Consent Calendar Items 2, 3, and 9 are removed for further dis-
cussion.
Item Number 7 is removed and continued to a future Council Meet-
ing per applicant's request.
MOTION: Councilmember Borgeson moves approval of Consent
Calendar Items (except 2, 3, 7, & 9) ; Councilmember
Bourbeau seconds; Motion carries 4-1 (Councilmember
Handshy abstains)
B-1 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2G-87 - ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW
STANDARDS ELEMENT AMENDMENT - INITIATED BY THE CITY OF
ATASCADERO - PUBLIC HEARING
RESOLUTION 88-87 AMEND THE TEXT OF THE COMMUNITY APPEARANCE
AND STANDARDS ELEMENT OF THE CITY' S GENERAL PLAN BY DELETING
REFERENCE TO A DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION
Henry Engen, Community Development Director , states that Council
previouslyadopted the Appearance P pp ranee and Review Standards. Staff
requests the Appearance and Review Standards be in conformance
with the City's General Plan by deleting reference to "Appearance
Review Commission" .
.
Several Council members express concerns with the removal of the
Commission, even though it is not utilized at this time.
Gary Harcourt, Architectural Review Guidelines co-author ,
suggests adding an "or" clause to the text clarifying which
process is presently being utilized (Design Review Manual or
Commission)
MOTION: Councilmember Bourbeau moves for adoption of
Resolution 88-87; Councilmember Handshy seconds;
After further Council discussion, the above motion
is withdrawn.
MOTION: Councilmember Mackey directs staff to represent
Resolution 88-87 at the 9/8 Council with amended
language to reflect the use of a Design Review
Manual "or" Design Review Committee" ; Motion second-
ed by Councilmember Borgeson; Motion carries unani-
mously.
B-2 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2H-87 - REVISION OF THE GENERAL PLAN
. CIRCULATION ELEMENT (TABLE VIII-2) - INITIATED BY CITY OF
ATASCADERO - PUBLIC HEARING
RESOLUTION 87-87 - AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION
ELEMENT BY ELIMINATION OF TABLE VIII-2, "RECAPITULATION OF
Z
• • il!
PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE COLONY UNDER
VARIOUS FISCAL JURISDICTIONS
Henry Engen, Community Development Director , explains that the
proposed amendment removes non-circulation projects from the
Circulation Element of the General Plan. This proposal was
approved by the Planning Commission.
Council voices mixed opinions regarding the proposed removal and
the General Plan being too specific in this area.
MOTION: Councilmember Mackey moves to continue this item
for consideration through the General Plan Update
Process; Councilmember Borgeson seconds; Motion
carries unanimously
B-3 ASSEMBLY BILL 2020 (BOTTLE BILL)
Henry Engen, Community Development Director , points out that the
Bottle Bill has recently been adopted, and to be implemented in
October , 1987 . He clarifies that the Zoning Ordinance allows for
recycle collection stations in all land use zones, although
"appearance standards for the collection stations need to be
established.
The bill requires recycle centers be placed by supermarkets
within 1/2 mile of their facility for bottles and cans.
At this time, there is no provisions for recycling materials
other than bottles and cans.
Council adjourns at 9 :00 for a 15 minute break.
C-1 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 5-87 - 8925 ATASCADERO AVENUE
PROPOSAL TO ALLOW A SUBDIVISION OF 1. 72 ACRES INTO THREE
LOTS OF 21, 805, 21, 788, AND 20 ,280 SQUARE FEET EACH, OR
CITY SUGGESTED ALTERNATIVE OF A TWO-WAY LOT DIVISION OF
31,993 AND —11 ,883 SQUARE FEET EACH - FISHER (Cont'd from
4/28 and 8/11/87 Council Meetings)
Henry Engen, Community Development Director , summarizes events on
this project from previous Council Meetings. It was continued
from September 11, 1987 , to allow consideration by the whole
Council.
Council has previously reviewed both the three-way versus two-way
lot split proposals with concerns on both noted in previous
Council minutes.
Councilmember Bourbeau, absent at the 8/11/87 Council Meeting,
states that he has listened to the Council Meeting recordings of
A
Seconded by Councilmember Mackey; Motion fails
3-2 (Councilmembers Bourbeau, Handshy and Mayor
Norris opposed)
MOTION: Councilmember Handshy moves approval of a
three-way lot split at 8925 Atascadero Avenue,
with revised conditions for road maintenance agree-
ment and reflective house numbers for home sites
posted; Seconded by Councilmember Bourbeau; Motion
carries 4-1 (Councilmember Borgeson opposed)
C-2 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2E-87 AND ZONE CHANGE 10-87 -
5599 TRAFFIC WAY - INITIATED BY THE CITY OF ATASCADERO
(Continued from 8/11/87 Council Meeting)
A. RESOLUTION 84-87 — AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN TEXT
ON OPEN SPACE AND CONSERVATION ELEMENT (Second Read-
ing) (Cont'd from 8/11/87)
B. ORDINANCE 157 - AMENDMENT TO THE OFFICIAL ZONING TEXT
RELATIVE TO ALLOWED USES IN THE PUBLIC ZONE
This item was continued from the 8/11/87 Council Meeting due to
the County of San Luis Obispo objecting to the inclusion of the
"Armory" property in the zone change.
The City is proposing the Zone Change/General Plan Amendment in
order to qualify for State Grant funds to revitalize the existing
Traffic Way ball fields. An overall area has been proposed to be
affected to allow a mix of public and recreational uses.
The Armory property, presently zoned Light Industry, is presently
being negotiated by the County and State National Guard in a
property exchange. Changes to the zoning could jeopardize these
negotiations. Appraisals completed on the Armory were based on a
light industry zoning.
Per the County' s request, staff recommends removal of the Armory
from inclusion in the boundaries of the proposed General Plan
Amendment and Zone Change. Staff further excludes Lot 6 (APN
29-091-06) , presently being considered by the City of Atascadero
for surplus.
Michael Lara, Parks and Recreation Commissioner requests language
in the Zone Change be amended from "little league fields" to
"multi-purpose fields" .
Curt Sorg, County of San Luis Obispo representative, expresses
the County' s desire to be excluded from the implications of the
proposed Zone Change/General Plan Amendment.
A
• •
MOTION: Councilmember Mackey moves to approve Resolution
84-87, with Exhibit A Amendment on the Armory and
text changes from "little league fields" to "multi-
purpose fields"; Councilmember Handshy seconds;
motion carried unanimously
MOTION: Councilmember Bourbeau moves to read Ordinance 157
by title only; Councilmember Borgeson seconds;
Motion carries unanimously
MOTION: Councilmember Bourbeau moves to approve Ordinance
157 as the second and final reading; Councilmember
Borgeson seconds; Motion carries unanimously
C-3 ORDINANCE 156 - AMENDMENT OF OFFICIAL ZONING MAPS FROM
RESIDENTIAL SUBURBAN TO RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY, 1 ACRE
MINIMUM (GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2B-87/ZONE CHANGE 5-87) -
8430 SANTA ROSA ROAD (MESSER/CUESTA ENGINEERING) (ORDINANCE
156 (SECOND READING) (Continued from 8/11/87)
It is noted that no public or Council comment was given on this
item.
MOTION: Councilmember Bourbeau moves to read Ordinance
156 by title only; Councilmember Mackey seconds;
Motion caries unanimously.
MOTION: Councilmember Mackey moves to adopt Ordinance
156 as the second and final reading; Councilmember
Handshy seconds; Motion carries 3-2 (Councilmember
Borgeson & Bourbeau opposed)
D-1 COUNCIL CONSIDERATION REGARDING CONDUCTING A SURVEY ON
THE DIRECT ELECTION OF THE MAYOR POSITION
Per Council' s previous comments, staff is proposing a newspaper
survey in two newspapers requesting public response as to whether
the Mayor position should be voter elected or appointed by
Council.
Councilmember Bourbeau states that if a ballot for voter elected
Mayor were passed in June, 1988, it could not go into effect
until June, 1990. By June, 1990 , all present Councilmembers will
have served their terms in office and not effected by the
decision of voter elect versus Council appointment. Thus, it is
felt that a decision on this item, at this time, is premature.
City Clerk Boyd Sharitz is directed by Council to coordinate the
details and ramifications of this proposal with the County Clerk
and respond back to Council.
Doug Lewis, resident, feels there is a need for Council to
explore the effects of voter-elect versus a Council appointed
Mayor position in other cities of similar size.
Councilmember Mackey feels a need for an editorial regarding this
subject in the newspaper prior to printing a survey.
Councilmember Borgeson states that the survey is viable no matter
when it would become effective.
MOTION: Councilmember Borgeson moves to publish in the
Atascadero News and the Telegram Tribune, North
County Edition, a survey regarding direct election
of the Mayor position, and to have City Clerk
respond back to Council on ramifications of placing
the item on the 1988 ballot; Seconded by Mayor
Norris; Motion carries 3-2 (Councilmembers Bourbeau
and Mackey opposed)
D-2 PLANNING COMMISSION RESPONSIBILITY - COUNCIL DISCUSSION
This item is continued for consideration at a future Council
Meeting
D-3 FREEWAY SIGN POLICY (Cont'd from 7/28/87 Council Comment)
This item is continued for consideration at a future Council
Meeting
D-4 AUTHORIZATION TO SOLICIT PROPOSALS - HISTORIC STRUCTURES
REPORT (Historic Preservation Grant Requirement)
This item is continued for consideration at the 9/8/87 Council
Meeting or future date if Sub Committee has not met prior to
Council date.
D-5 RESOLUTION 89-87 - CITY INVESTMENT POLICY
Gere Sibbach, City Treasurer , clarifies that the proposed invest-
ment policy will allow the City to invest in State Treasurer
Investments, which will allow for better returns.
MOTION: Councilmember Bourbeau moves approval of Resolution
89-87 , City Investment Policy; Councilmember
Borgeson seconds; Motion carries unanimously
• D-6 AUTHORIZATION TO ACCEPT BID PROPOSAL - DON
VALLEY MAZDA -
TWO PICKUP TRUCKS - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
$20 ,031. 04
0
Henry Engen, Community Development Director , states that the bid
from Don Valley Mazda is within the budget allocaton of $22, 000.
MOTION: Councilmember Bourbeau moves acceptance of bid
with Don Valley Mazda for $20 ,031. 04; Council member
Mackey seconds; Motion carries unanimously
E-1 SEPTIC TANK DUMP FACILITY - FEET
S RUCTURE
This item is continued for consideration at the 9/8/87 Council
Meeting.
A-2 CITY TREASURER'S REPORT - JULY, 1987
MOTION: Councilmember Bourbeau moves acceptance of the
July Treasurer ' s Report; Councilmember Mackey
seconds; Motion carries unanimously
A-3 CITY FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT - JULY, 1987
Council requests receiving the "Management Report" with "Check .
Runs" to Council Members who request receiving them, when they
become available.
MOTION: Councilmember Mackey moves approval of the July,
1987 Finance Report; Councilmember Bourbeau seconds;
Motion carries 3-2 (Councilmember Borgeson and Mayor
Norris opposed)
A-9 AUTHORIZATION TO SOLICIT BIDS - 1987/88 ROAD RESURFACING
PROJECT
Councilmember Borgeson states that project boundaries have been
clarified to her since review of the Consent Calendar .
MOTION: Councilmember Mackey moves authorization
to solicit bids for the 1987/88 Road Resurfacing
Councilmember Handshy seconds; motion carries
unanimously
F-1-b JOINT PLANNING COMMISSION/CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Staff is directed to formulate an agenda and coordinate an
acceptable date for the meeting with the committee.
F-1-c ALCOHOL IN CITY PARKS
Staff is directed to present at a future Council Meeting possible
restrictions to disallow alcohol in city parks.
The meeting is adjourned at 11:30 p.m. Council to reconvene into
a closed session regarding labor negotiations on September 16,
1987 in the fourth floor Club Room.
Submitted by:
Karen Vaughan
Deputy City Clerk
in
****PLEASE ADD INTO THE r ]?Z
�•G °v0A
9/22 COUNCIL AGENDA
PACKET*****
PACKET***** _I
ATASCADER T
O CITY COUNCIL
MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 8, 1987
Atascadero Administration Building
The regularmeetingof the Atascadero City Council is called to
order at 7 : 30 p.m. by Mayor Norris
ROLL CALL
Present: Councilmembers Borgeson, Handshy, Mackey, Bourbeau, and
Mayor Norris
Mayor Norris announces that there was a closed Council Session
prior to this meeting, with not all items discussed fully.
Council will adjourn tonight' s regular meeting into closed
Council Session regarding litigation issues, if time permits.
Mayor Norris announces the "Bells Across America and "World
Literacy Day" Proclamations.
• CITY COMMITTEES STATUS
The City/School Committee has received consultant reports regard-
ing Atascadero Creek Bridge placement alternatives. A Crossing
Guard has been placed at Monterey Road School.
The Bicentennial Committee will be holding a City event September
19th at 3:00 p.m. on the front steps of City Hall. The event
will be combined with the Historical Society' s 20th Anniversary
of the opening of the Museum. All are invited to attend.
The North Coastal Transit Committee met and are recommending two
Dial-A-Ride buses for Atascadero. The committee will meet again
on September 23 at 3 : 15.
COUNCIL COMMENT
Councilmember Handshy requests to change his "yes" vote to a "no"
vote on Item C-3 of the August 25, 1987 Council Meeting
(Ordinance 156, Second and Final Reading) Amendment .of Zoning
from Residential Suburban to Residential Single Family, 1 Acre
Minimum - General Plan Amendment 2B-87/Zone Change 5-87 - 8430
Santa Rosa Road - Messer/Cuesta Engineering)
. City Attorney Jorgensen confirms that a vote on an ordinance from
a previous Council Meeting cannot be amended.
1
PUBLIC COMMENT
Joe Nyle, Atascadero resident, questions the City' s misuse of
funds ($7, 000) for the defense of Council Members in a a recent
lawsuit.
Maggie Rice, Colony Days representative, announces the 14th
Annual Colony Days event in October.
Planning Commissioner Eric Michielssen states that he was named
in the Graham Lawsuit, and feels the City should provide legal
services for elected officials.
Joe Nyle responds to Mr. Michielssen' s comment, agreeing that the
City should provide legal services to elected officials for their
actions as elected officials, but not for their actions as
individuals.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1. Approval of City Council- Minutes - August 25 , 1987
2. Tentative Parcel Map 24-87 - 9122 Atascadero Avenue - -Subdivisi�
of One Parcel of 1. 433 Acres into Three Lots of 21,700 , 20,000 ,
and 20 , 200 Square Feet Each - O'Bannon/Cuesta Engineering
3. Tentative Tract Map 13-87 - 8519 El Dorado Road - Proposed
Subdivision of Six Parcels Totaling 6 .81 Acres into Twelve
Lots Containing Approximately 20 ,000 Square Feet Each -
Peterson Development Corporation (Steve Devencenzi)
4. Denial of Proposed Lot Line Adjustment 13-87 - 7905 Marchant
To Adjust the Property Line Between Two Existing Lots of Record
Kling/Cuesta Engineering
5. Acceptance of Final Tract Map 20-86 - 8305 Coromar - Molina/
Twin Cities Engineering
6. Proclamation - Acknowledgement of September 8, 1987 , as "World
Literacy Day"
7. Proclamation — Acknowledgement of September , October , November,
and December, 1987, as "Good Neighbor Months"
j
Item A-1 is continued to the September 22, 1987 Council Meeting •
for action.
2
• Items A-2, A-3, and A-4 are removed for further discussion
MOTION: Councilmember Borgeson moves for approval of
the Consent Calendar , except Items A-1 through A-4;
Councilmember Mackey seconds; motion carries
B-1 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2G-87 - ARCHITECURAL REVIEW STANDARDS
ELEMENT AMENDMENT - INITIATED BY THE CITY OF ATASCADERO
JContinued from 8/25/87) - PUBIC HEARING
RESOLUTION 88-87 - AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN TEXT OF
THE COMMUNITY APPEARANCE AND STANDARDS ELEMENT REFERENCE TO
A DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION
This item was continued from the August 25, 1987 Council Meeting
for staff to rewrite the resolution to allow retaining an option
of utilizing an Appearance Review Manual or Design Review
Commission.
Hal Hays, Appearance Review Committee member , endorses the
"either/or" concept for a manual or committee on proposed struc-
ture review.
• No Council comment was given on this item.
MOTION: Councilmember Bourbeau moves approval of Resolution
88-87 and General Plan Amendment 2G-87; Council-
member Mackey seconds; Motion carries unanimously
C-1 COUNCIL RECONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION 81-87 - PROPOSED
VACATION OF A PORTION OF CURBARIL, ADJACENT TO 9404
CURBARIL - (Cont'd from 8/11/87)
It is clarified that no action was taken on this item at the
August 11, 1987 Council Meeting due to confusion of the exact
property boundary lines.
Henry Engen, Community Development Director states that the
applicant Charles Gray is proposing to merge the excess Curbaril
right-of-way with his adjoining property.
Council is requested by staff to make a conceptual approval only,
allowing staff and applicant time to negotiate conditions. and
re-present Resolution 81-87 for Council action at a later date-
No Council or public comment was given on this item.
MOTION: Councilmember Borgeson moves approval of Resolution
. 81-87 conceptually, and requests staff to nego-
tiate conditions of agreement with applicant and
re-present Resolution 81-87 for final action;
Councilmember Bourbeau seconds; Motion carries unan-
imously
3
D-1 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 26-87 - 11300 VIEJO CAMINO -
PROPOSED SUBDIVISION OF 27.01 ACRES INTO FOUR LOTS OF 8 .52,
4,23, 6. 59 AND 7.67 ACRES EACH - BORDEAUX HOUSE
(YAMABE/HORN
Henry Engen, Community Development Director states that this item
is a follow-up to the applicant's original proposal, which was
acted on by Council previously. The applicant is requesting
authorization to sell four parcels for private ownership. He
also states that C.C.and R. requirements and maintenance agree-
ments on all common areas have been reviewed by the City
Attorney.
No public comment is received on this item.
MOTION: Councilmember Mackey moves approval of Tentative
Parcel Map 26-87 ; Councilmember Handshy seconds;
Motion carries 4-1 (Mayor Norris opposed)
D-2 AUTHORIZATION TO SOLICIT PROPOSALS - HISTORIC STRUCTURES
REPORT (HISTORIC PRESERVATION GRANT REQUIREMENT)
Paul Sensibaugh, Public Works Director noted that the - Historic
Preservation Grant was received by the City two years ago in the
amount of $300 ,000 with a City match of $270 ,000 . To date the
structural renovations and asbestos removal have been completed.
The next phase, heating/ventalation, has been held up since
November, 1986 by the State, with objections to the installation
of vents (exposed vent system or modifying the building interior
to install) . Since this time, the State has requested a Historic
Structures Report to review past and proposed renovations on a
room-by-room basis. Staff is unaware of impacts that may result
from this type of report or how long a the report would take to
prepare. Staff recommends that Council authorize staff to
solicit proposals for the report, and later determine whether the
City wishes to pursue such a study. Paul clarifies that $80,000
of grant funds have been spent thus far .
Councilmember Mackey feels the Historical Society would be bene-
ficial in providing information that would be needed for this
report.
Michael Shelton, City Manager summarizes the building' s present
condition with resulting unsatisfactory working conditions, and
feels this subject needs to be addressed and acted upon as soon
as possible.
4
It is determined by Council that a letter from the Council should
l
be prepared and submitted to the State Historic Preservation
Office and to the City' s legislative representatives reflecting
the City Council' s position regarding this subject.
No public comment was given on this item.
MOTION: Councilmember Bourbeau authorizes staff to
solicit Requests for Proposals for an Historic
Structures Report and transmit letters from Council
to the State Historic Preservation Office and legis-
lative representatives; Councilmember Borgeson
seconds; Motion carries unanimously
D-3 RESOLUTION 93-87 - APPROVAL TO PURCHASE DATA PROCESSING
EQUIPMENT AND SOFTWARE - IBM HARDWARE / DLH SOFTWARE
David Jorgensen, Administrative Services Director, referenced a
consultant study prepared in 1985 on the City' s computer system,
which showed the current system as under utilized, with poor
software, and over utilized in word processing. Staff further
clarifies software/hardware inefficiencies by application and
department needs.
• Council authorized staff to solicit for porposals for computer
hardware and software in April, 1987 . Two bids were received for
both hardware and software by I .B.M. and Hewlett Packard and cor-
responding software. After various computer exhibits and nego-
tiations, staff recommends the I.B.M. hardware with DLH/INE soft-
ware at a cost of $96 ,154.
It is noted that the present computer system would later be sold
through a secondary market.
Council reviews proposed computer costs and annual payments.
Discussion continues regarding requests by Parks and Recreation
Department and Community Development for hardware/software that
was not originally approved in the 1987/88 budget process.
Staff clarifies a need for all departments to utilize the same
word processing equipment to allow inter-departmental acces-
sibility.
MOTION: Councilmember Borgeson moves to approve
Resolution 93-87, with amendment exempting
additional funds for Parks & Recreation Department' s
request for two personal computers and one printer ;
Mayor Norris seconds; Motion fails 2-3
(Councilmembers Bourbeau, Handshy and Mackey
opposed)
5
MOTIN: Councilmember Mackey moves approval of Resolution
93-87; Councilmember Handshy seconds; Motion carries
unanimously
D-4 RESOLUTION 92-87 - APPROVAL OF LEASE PURCHASE AGREEMENT WITH
SECURITY PACIFIC MERCHANT BANK FOR DATA PROCESSING
EQUIPMENT/RELATED SOFTWARE ($96 ,154) , NEW FIRE TRUCK
t$137 ,318.76) , AND REFINANCING OF EXISTING FIRE TRUCK
David Jorgensen, Administrative Services Director , recommends
Council authorizing financing of the proposed computer system,
authorized new Fire Engine, and refinancing of the fire engine
purchased in 1985. Interest rate will be 7 .07% with an annual
cost of $74,824.40. It is noted that the proposed agreements
have been previously reviewed by the City Attorney.
No public comment given on this item.
MOTION: Councilmember Bourbeau moves approval of
Resolution 92-87 ; Councilmember Mackey seconds;
Motion carries unanimously
D-5 RESOLUTION 94-87 - APPROPRIATION OF COUNCIL CONTINGENCY •
FUNDS OF $137 .02 FOR "EMPLOYEE SOFTBALL TOURNAMENT"
Michael Shelton, City Manager , states that this proposal will
provide memorbilia for the winning team of the first annual City
Softball Tournament. The event provides an opportunity for
employees to interact away from the working environment and is an
alternative to the annual employee picnic.
Councilmember Borgeson, though not opposed to a city softball
Tournament, feels this item should not be addressed to the
Council, and that employees could purchase the memorabilia.
Other Councilmembers agree with the proposal' s worthiness.
MOTION: Councilmember Borgeson moves to approve the
appropriation of $137 .02 for a City Employees Soft-
ball Tournament; Councilmember Bourbeau seconds;
motion carries unanimously
A-2 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 24-87 - 9122 ATASCADERO AVENUE -
SUBDIVISION OF ONE PARCEL INTO THREE LOTS OF 21, 700,
20, 000 , AND 20 , 200 SQUARE FEET EACH - O'BANNON/CUESTA
ENGINEERING
Henry Engen, Community Development Director , reviews the project
proposal in that the Planning Commission recommended approval, •
and staff has added a condition to the project. He clarifies
that there are no existing standards on driveway setbacks from
existing structures. Staff clarifies that driveway requirements
6
are 12 feet wide for two lots and 16 feet wide for 3 or more
lots.
Council requests a future report from staff on the amount of flag
lots existing in this area.
Councilmember Bourbeau requests staff to provide a condition to
the project of reflectorized address posting at the roadway for
flag lots.
Councilmember Borgeson expresses her concerns regarding the pro-
posed access not supporting enough space for two emergency
vehicles to access the flag lots at one time, if needed.
John Falkenstein, Cuesta Engineering and applicant repre-
sentative, states that the proposed easement is 20-feet wide, per
the City' s requirements, with a 16 foot driveway He feels that
the sites are level and offer additional affordable housing to
Atascadero.
MOTION: Councilmember Mackey moves approval of Tentative
Parcel Map 24-87 , with address sign posting require-
ment; Councilmember Bourbeau seconds; motion carries
4-1 (Councilmember Borgeson opposed)
• A-3 TENTATIVE _
TRACT MAP 13-87 8519 EL DORADO ROAD - PROPOSED
SUBDIVISION OF SIX PARCELS TOTALING 6 .81 ACRES INTO TWELVE
LOTS CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 20,000 SQUARE FEET EACH
PETERSON DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (STEVE DEVENCENZI)
Henry Engen, Community Development Director , states that the
Planning Commission approved the proposed subdivision with con-
ditions. All lots are over the 20,000 square foot minimum lot
size.
Paul Sensibaugh, Public Works Director , elaborates on the "fair
share" payment formula by the applicant for construction of a
traffic signal at Palomar and E1 Camino Real.
Council feels the "fair share" payment formula for road/traffic
improvements needs to be more specific and defined.
Councilmember Borgeson objects to the reduction of lots below the
1/2 acre, and feels this proposal is premature for the area.
Steve Devencenzi, applicant representative, clarifies the change
in applicant fees for traffic signal was due to a misunderstand-
ing as to how many lots are being proposed.
• Council requires applicant to make a cash payment at the beginn-
ing of the proposed development for traffic signal construction.
7
MOTION : Councilmember Bourbeau moves approval of .
Tentative Parcel Map 13-87 , with requirement of
address sign posting and traffic signal fees to be
paid at the beginning of development; Councilmember
Mackey seconds; Motion carries unanimously
A-4 DENIAL OF PROPOSED LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 13-87 - 7905 MARCHANT
ADJUSTMENT OF PROPERTY LINE BETWEEN TWO EXISTING LOTS OF
RECORD - KLING/CUESTA ENGINEERING
Henry Engen, Community Development Director , reviews Planning
Commission' s recommendation to deny the proposal, as the proposed
lot line is not a parallel move (City criteria) , and the reduc-
tion in lot size is not recommended for a non-conforming lot
size. Staff clarifies that the applicant would not be able to
resubmit a parcel map due to the non-conforming lot size. It is
felt that the proposal is not characteristic with the neighbor-
hood.
John Falkenstein, Cuesta Engineering and applicant represent-
ative, offers an alternative of re-presenting a revised lot line
boundary that could be considered more conducive to City cri-
teria.
Council discusses concerns with the proposal in that it does not •
keep with the general characteristic of the neighborhood and
appears to be developed with one lot in mind.
MOTION: Councilmember Bourbeau moves to deny Proposed
Lot Line Adjustment 13-87 ; Councilmember Borgeson
seconds; Motion carries 4-1 (Councilmember Handshy
opposed)
E-1 SEPTIC TANK DUMP FACILITY - FEE STRUCTURE
Paul Sensibaugh, Public Works Director , states that the
Atascadero facility is the only existing plant in the County that
accepts septic tank dumping, except for landfill dump sites.
Staff recommends not restricting dumping to Atascadero only.
Staff also feels that the current fee of $20 per load dumped is
adequate for operation, maintenance and replacement of the
facility.
F-5 CITY MANAGER' S REPORT
A date of September 24 has been set for the joint City Council/
Planning Commission Meeting, to be held in the Fourth Floor Club
Room. An agenda will be forthcoming.
8
• The meeting is adjourned at 10 : 59 p.m. and to reconvene on
September 16 at a time to be set for a City Council Workshop.
Submitted by:
i
.J
KA -N VAUGHAN
Deputy City Clerk
i
9
****PLEASE INCLUDE INTO
THE 9/22 COUNCIL AGENDA
PACKET***
•
P R O C L A M A T I O N
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF
OCTOBER 1 - 10, 1987
AS
"NATIONAL MENTAL ILLNESS AWARENESS WEEK"
WHEREAS, mental illness is known to be a disease of the
brain and not caused by individual weaknesses or poor family
life; and
WHEREAS, mentally ill persons and their families are
stigmatized by myths and prejudices surrounding mental illness,
• and are thereby doubly victimized by the illness.
THEREFORE, the Atascadero City Council commends the families
of the National Alliance for the Mentally 1ll, who have joined
together to support each other and to educate the public on the
Plight of the mentally ill.
I, Barbara Norris, Mayor of the City of Atascadero, do
proclaim October 1-10, 1987, as "Mental Illness Awareness Week
BARBARA NORRIS
Mayor
�if - F j September 22, 1987
•
P R O C L A M A T I O N
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF
SEPTEMBER 22, 1987
AS
"AMERICAN BUSINESS WOMEN DAY"
WHEREAS, the American Business Womens ' Association was
founded in 1949 , and;
WHEREAS, the mission of the American Business' Womens
Association is to bring together business women of diverse
backgrounds, and to provide opportunities for them to help
themselves and others grow personally and professionally
through leadership, education, network support, and
national recognition.
THEREFORE, I, Barbara Norris, Mayor of the City of
Atascadero declare Septemer 22, 1987 as "American Business
Women Week" and acknowledge the local Chapter , Colony Charter
• Chapter, within the City of Atascadero.
BARBARA NORRIS
Mayor
September 22,1987
****PLEASE INCLUDE INTO �
THE 9/22 COUNCIL AGENDA
PACKET****
• M E M O R A N D U M
i
TO: City Council Members September 22, 1987
FROM: Michael Shelton
City Manager
SUBJECT: PROPOSED RESOLUTION 10-2-87 - SAN LUIS OBISPO AREA
COORDINATING COUNCIL JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY AGREEMENT
RATIFICATION
RECOMMENDATION
Council adopt Resolution 102-87, authorizing the Mayor to
enter into Fiscal Year 1987/88 agreement with the San Luis
Obispo Area Coordinating Cuoncil Joint Powers Authority.
BACKGROUND
Section IV of the Area Coordinating Council requires annual
ratification by member agencies. The attached letter and
• proposed agreement is provided for your consideration.
FISCAL IMPACT
Per the attached agreement, staff and other costs of the Area
Coordinating Council is funded by the County. Cost for
City representatives to attend meetings is the responsibility
of the City. This policy is unchanged from prior years.
MS:kv
Enc. Resolution 102-87
Proposed 1987/88 Agreement
File: MSLOMOU
•
•
RESOLUTION NUMBER 102-87
RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF ATASCADERO
RATIFYING A JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
WITH SAN LUIS OBISPO CITIES/COUNTY
AREA COORDINATING COUNCIL
Fical Year 1987-88
WHEREAS, a Joint Powers Agreement has been submitted to the
City of Atascadero for ratification by the City of Atascadero,
and
WHEREAS, it is desirable to maintain a single agency created
by and with the consent of cities and the County to advise, plan
for , and suggest solutions to common problems; and
WHEREAS , the maintenance of such agency and its functions are
necessary to comply with requirements . of various Federal . and
State legislation in order to participate in the allocation and •
disbursement of State and Federal funds.
THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Atascadero resolves as
follows:
Section 1. Authorize the Mayor to execute the Fiscal Year
1986-87 Joint Powers Agreement in behalf of the City.
Section 2. Instruct the City Clerk to certify adoption of
this resolution and cause this resolution and certification to be
entered into the Book of Resolutions of the Council of this City.
On motion by and seconded by
, the foregoing resolution is hereby
adopted in its entirety by the following vote :
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT.-
DATE
BSENT:DATE ADOPTED:
•
(Resolution 102-87' - Cont ' d)
•
ATTEST: CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA
BOYD SHARITZ BARBARA NORRIS
City Clerk Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
JEFFREY G. JORGENSEN
City Attorney
File : R8086
San Luis Obispo Area Coordinating Council Arroyo GAtascde
Grover Ci
Morro
rand Regional Transportation Planning Agency Paso Rob
Pismo Beach
San Luis Obispo
San Luis Obispo County
R E C E I V V
August 12, 1987 AUG 15 tUti/
CITY M(-',R.
Mr. Mike Shelton, City Admin.
City of Atascadero
P. 0. Box 747
Atascadero, CA. 93422
Dear Mr. Shelton:
The San Luis Obispo Area Coordinating Council was created through a Joint
Powers Agreement (JPA) with its member agencies. A copy of this
Agreement is attached. The Agreement specifies the purpose, powers,
membership, staffing and financing of the Area Council. Section IV
requires each member to annually ratify the document. No amendments to
this document have been proposed.
In accordance with this Agreement, please schedule your governing board
to ratify the JPA by resolution or minute order and forward a copy of
your action to our office.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
PAUL C. CRAWFORD
Executive Director
RONALD L. DE CARLI
Program Manager
Attachment
RLD/cl/6965-1
8-11-87
County Government Center, San Luis Obispo, CA 93408 (805) 549-5710
FY 87/88
JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
SAN LUIS OBISPO AREA COORDINATING COUNCIL
THIS JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 17th day of
January, 1976, and amended on November 4, 1982, and September 19, 1984,
by and among such of the incorporated cities of Arroyo Grande, Atas-
cadero, El Paso de Robles, Grover City, Morro Bay, Pismo Beach, and San
Luis Obispo, all being municipal corporations of the State of California
and located within the boundaries of the County of San Luis Obispo,
California, as may execute this Agreement, hereinafter called "CITIES,"
and the County of San Luis Obispo, a body politic and corporate and a
subdivision of the State of California, hereinafter called "COUNTY," as
follows:
WHEREAS, Section 6500, et seq. , of the California Government Code
(Title 1, Division 7, Chapter 5, Article 1) provides for agreements
between two or more public agencies to jointly exercise any power common
to the contracting parties, subject to certain mandatory provisions
contained therein; and
WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo by virtue of its charter, and
the other incorporated cities in the County, parties hereto, by virtue of
Sections 65600 through 65604, inclusive, of the California Government
Code have the joint and mutual power to create an area planning
commission, herein designated "San Luis Obispo Area Coordinating Council."
WHEREAS, COUNTY AND CITIES did, in 1968, jointly execute an agreement
establishing such a planning council and now wish to amend and supersede
the same; and
JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
PAGE 2
WHEREAS, Section 29532, California Government Code, provides that
such a Planning and Coordinating Council shall be designated the Regional
Transportation Planning Agency to act in matters of transit and
transportation planning; and
WHEREAS, it is desirable that a single agency be created by and with
the consent of CITIES and COUNTY to advise, plan .for, and suggest
solutions to common problems; assist in the preparation of plans and
programs by utilizing planning talents and general plans of the various
governmental jurisdictions in the County and of experts in various other
fields and to coordinate their efforts; and
WHEREAS, creation of such an agency and action by it upon certain
plans and programs is necessary to comply with requirements of federal
and state legislation in order to participate in the allocation and
disbursement of state and federal funds which may be desired by COUNTY
and CITIES in the implementation of plans and programs which have been
approved by their respective governing bodies.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed as follows:
I. PURPOSE
The San Luis Obispo Area Coordinating Council is organized for the
permanent establishment of a forum for planning, discussion and study of
area-wide problems of mutual interest and concern to COUNTY and to
CITIES; for the development of studies and adoption of regional plans; to
serve as a regional agency for certain federal and state programs; and
for other actions commensurate with the desires of the member governments.
JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
PAGE 3
I I. NAME
The official name of the organization hereby created shall be the
"San Luis Obispo Area Coordinating Council."
III. POWERS
The San Luis Obispo Area Coordinating Council hereinafter called
"Area Council," is hereby created as a voluntary agency pursuant to
applicable provisions of the California Government Code with the power to
"carry out the purposes hereinabove stated and to implement the annual
work program approved by COUNTY and CITIES, including the power to
contract for goods and services; to provide for employment of necessary
personnel, experts and consultants; to accept gifts, loans, grants; and
to administer the affairs of the Area Council hereby created in
accordance with this Agreement.
Pursuant to Section 6508.1, California Government Code, it is hereby
declared by COUNTY and CITIES that the debts, liabilities and obligations
of the Area Council shall not be the debts, liabilities and obligations
of any of the parties to this Agreement, except as otherwise provided
herein.
IV. MEMBERSHIP
1 Membership in the Area Council shall be voluntary, but only the
County of San Luis Obispo and all cities incorporated in the County of
San Luis Obispo presently or in the future, are declared eligible for
membership in the Area Council.
JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
PAGE 4
2. Representatives of the COUNTY and CITIES shall be appointed to
serve on the Area Council in accordance with procedures established by
each of the governing bodies of the member agencies. Representatives to
the Area Council shall consist of the five members of the Board of
Supervisors of the County of San Luis Obispo from time to time in office
and of one additional member from the governing body of each incorporated
city within the boundaries of the County of San Luis Obispo which is a
;,party to this Agreement, with each incorporated area being limited to one
representative. Representatives shall serve so long as they hold office
with their member agency or until they shall resign or be removed by a
majority vote of their respective governing bodies. Vacancies among
representatives shall be filled in the same manner as the first .
appointment.
3. Member agencies may elect to have an alternate member in
addition to any official member, but said alternate shall be able to vote
only in the absence of the official representative.
4. Designation of the official representative or alternate, or
changes thereto, shall be transmitted in writing to the Executive
Director of the Area Council by the appointing city or the county.
5. In addition to the incorporated cities presently a party to this
Agreement, any other city which may hereafter be incorporated within the
boundaries of the County of San Luis Obispo and which may desire to
participate in the activities of the Area Council may do so by executing
this Agreement without prior approval or ratification of the named
JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
PAGE 5
parties to this Agreement and shall thereafter be governed by all the
terms and provisions of this Agreement as of the date of execution.
6. Membership shall be contingent upon the execution of this Joint
Powers Agreement and subsequent annual ratification.
V. OPERATION
1. The powers of the Area Council are advisory to the member
agencies which execute this Agreement except for those actions mandated
�by state or federal law for the processing of applications submitted by
any of the member agencies for federal and state grants or funds which
require action by the Area Council. Nothing herein shall be construed to
limit in any manner the power of any of the parties to initiate and
complete a local project within their respective jurisdictions with their
own funds. It is understood, however, that the recommendations of the
Area Council may have the effect of precluding any favorable action by an
agency of the state of federal government in support of such a project if
other than local financing is sought, as determined by the respective
state or federal agency under law, regulations and policies applicable to
them.
2. Except as otherwise provided herein, there shall be no costs
incurred by Area Council pursuant hereto, other than expenses of its
members, which are to be borne by their respective entities, and the cost
of services by the officers and personnel of the respective entities to
said Area Council, upon approval of such services by the governing bodies
hereof, shall likewise be borne by the respective entities.
JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
PAGE 6 .
All costs incurred by Area Council performing functions as the
regional transportation agency for San Luis Obispo County as designated
by the State shall be paid out of the transportation fund established
pursuant to Section 29530, et seq. , Government Code as provided for
therein.
3. Costs of Area Council for each fiscal year which are necessary
for the ordinary operation of the Area Council, including but not limited
%to office space, furniture, supplies and postage; and excepting those
functions performed as the regional transportation agency, shall be borne
by COUNTY in an amount approved by the Board of Supervisors in the annual
county _budget. Extraordinary costs as recommended by the Area Council
shall be borne by contributions from the member entities as approved by
their governing bodies.
Costs of all activities undertaken by Area Council as the Regional
Transportation Planning Agency shall be set forth in the budget as part
of the annual work program of Area Council and shall be funded from the
transportation fund pursuant to applicable state statutes.
4. The annual work program and budget, when adopted shall be the
basis for operation of Area Council for the fiscal year. Any deviation
from the work program affecting the budget shall be returned to the
member agencies for approval.
5. For purposes of conducting business, there shall be present a
quorum consisting of a majority of representatives, including two COUNTY
representatives. No action shall be effective without the affirmative
JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
PAGE 7
votes of a majority of representatives. However, eight (8) affirmative
votes shall be required for taking any action in the event any agency
demands such a vote. The representatives to the Area Council shall adopt
such procedures as are consistent with this Agreement and necessary to
conduct the business of Area Council in an orderly manner.
VI. OFFICERS
1. The officers of the Area Council shall consist of a President
and Vice-President elected for a term of one year by a majority vote of
member agency representatives to the Area Council.
2. Both the President and Vice-President of Area Council shall be
elected at the May meeting (annual meeting).
i3. The officers shall serve until their successors are elected.
4. The duties of the officers shall be as follows:
a. President
1) Shall preside over all meetings of the Area Council as
Chairman.
2) Shall appoint all standing committees.
3) Shall exercise general supervision over all activities
of said Area Council.
4) Shall be an ex-officio member of all committees.
5) Shall execute all contracts and legal documents on
behalf of the Area Council.
b. Vice-President
1) Shall serve as Chairman pro-tempor in the absence of
the President.
r JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
( PAGE 8
2) Shall give whatever aid necessary to the President in
administering of the Area Council.
3) Shall be an ex-officio member of all committees.
S. In the event of a vacancy occurring in the office of either the
President or Vice-President upon said officer's death, resignation,
removal or his ceasing to be an official representative of a member city
of the County of San Luis Obispo, such vacancy will be filled by majority
:-vote of the Area Council, the officer elected to serve for the balance of
the unexpired term.
VII. STAFF
1. The Area Council shall appoint an Executive Director to serve at
its pleasure, who will perform the following duties and such others as
C_
may be assigned by Area Council.
a. Prepare and submit the annual work program and budget to
the Area Council for its approval and to the parties hereto
for ratification.
b. Shall keep an accurate account and file of all meetings.
C. Shall disburse all funds in accordance with the policies of
the County-Treasurer and the County Auditor/Controller and
the budget and work program adopted by the Area Council.
d. Shall have charge of all correspondence.
e. Shall keep and maintain the reports of the Area Council on
all committees.
JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
PAGE 9
f. Shall insure that Area Council renders a written year end
report reflecting activities of the preceding fiscal year,
said year end report to be distributed to each of the
participating member bodies.
g. Shall be responsible for directing those employees
authorized by the Area Council in the budget. Employees
are to be appointed by the Area Council on the
recommendation of the Executive Director and to serve at
the pleasure of the Area Council.
2. The Executive Director of the Area Council shall have charge of,
handle and have access to, any property of the Area Council.
3. The Executive Director, Treasurer, and Auditor-Controller shall
be bonded or self-insured through the county in-lieu of bonds (in
accordance with Government Code Section 24156) in the sum of $1000.
VIII. MEETINGS
1. Regular meetings of the Area Council shall be held at least six
(6) times a year or at more frequent intervals as approved by the Area
Council.
2. Special meetings may be called by the President or upon written
request of at least three (3) representatives of the Area Council.
Actual notice of special meetings must be given at least three (3)
business days in advance.
3. Meetings shall be open to the public as required by state law.
JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
PAGE 10 .
4. Regular meetings shall be generally held in the first week of
January, March, May, July, September and November, or as specified in the
annual meeting calendar adopted in May. The May meeting shall be
designated the "annual meeting."
5. The Executive Director of the Area Council will direct the
publication of notices of all meetings pursuant to state law.
6. Only official representatives or alternates shall represent a
:,member of the Area Council or vote on any motion before the Area Council.
7. The meeting agenda shall be prepared by the Executive Director
to the Area Council. Agenda material shall be submitted to the Executive
Director at least twenty—one (21) calendar days prior to the next regular
Cmeeting and distributed to members at least fourteen (14) calendar days
prior to the next regular meeting to allow member agencies to advise
their representatives on tentative vote subject to independent judgement
of delegate based on public testimony. Unless authorized by majority
vote of the representatives at a regular meeting, only agenda items shall
be considered by the Area Council.
8. The Area Council, at the discretion of the President, may
memorialize any of its actions by resolution.
9. Robert's Rules of Order or such other rules as the Area Council
may adopt will govern all proceedings not specifically provided for
herein.
10. Executive sessions shall be held in accordance with applicable
law.
JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
PAGE 11
11. The Area Council shall hold public hearings for the adoption of
Regional Plans.
12. Minutes of all Area Council meetings shall be kept by the
Executive Director to the Area Council and shall be submitted to member
agencies.
IX. COMMITTEES
1. Committees and subcommittees may be established as the Area
Council may deem appropriate.
2. Membership on committees shall be at the discretion of the
President. Nothing herein shall be construed to limit membership on
these aforesaid committees to officials of the member agencies. The
President may appoint any individual deemed qualified to serve on a
committee. Standing committees shall include the Administration
Committee, comprised of all managers and administrators of member
jurisdictions; the Legal Committee, comprised of all city and designated
county attorneys; the Planning Committee, comprised of all agency
planning officials nominated by their respective agencies; the Public
Works Committee, comprised of all agency engineering officials nominated
by their respective agencies; the Technical Transportation Advisory
Committee (TTAC) and the Citizen's Transportation Advisory Committee
(CTAC) as per the Memorandum of Understanding between the California
Department of Transportation and the Area Council; and the Transit
Productivity Committee as required by Section 99224 of the Public
Utilities Code. The Area Council may organize such other technical
advisory committees as it deems necessary to carry out Area Council
functions.
JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
PAGE 12
3. ` No committee shall commit the Area Council on any matter or
questions of policy. Such matters or questions can only be decided by
the Area Council.
4. All committees shall receive clerical assistance from the Area
Council staff for the purpose of maintaining minutes of meetings and
other such duties as the Executive Director may direct. The chairman of
each committee shall sign the original copy of the minutes indicating his
verification of contents. Copies of minutes of all meetings shall be
sent to members of the Area Council and the Executive Director.
X. FINANCE
1. The Area Council shall have no power to expend funds on any
project for which funds have not been budgeted, nor on any item in excess
of the budgeted amount without specific approval of two-thirds . of the
governing bodies of the member agencies including COUNTY.
2. The Treasurer of the County of San Luis Obispo is designated the
depositary, and he shall have custody of all money of the Area Council
from whatever source received. It is further understood that the
Auditor/Controller of the County of San Luis Obispo is, as such, auditor
of the Area Council.
XI. WITHDRAWAL AND DISSOLUTION
1. The parties to this Agreement pledge full cooperation and agree
to assign representatives to serve as official members of the Area
Council or any committee or subcommittee thereof who shall act for and on
behalf of their city or county in any or all matters which shall come
JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
PAGE 13
before the Area Council, subject to any necessary approval of their acts
by the governing bodies of CITIES and COUNTY.
2. Any party to this Agreement may withdraw from the San Luis
Obispo Area Coordinating Council and terminate its participation in this
agreement by resolution of its governing body. The withdrawal of the
member shall have no effect on the continuance of this Agreement among
the remaining members and the Agreement shall remain in full force and
effect as respects the remaining members.
3. A member withdrawing shall not be liable for the payment of
further contributions falling due beyond the date of withdrawal and shall
have no right to reimbursement of any monies previously paid to Area
Council, provided, however, that Area Council may authorize a
reimbursement if in its judgment such reimbursement is fair and equitable
and can be done without jeopardy to the operation of the Area Council.
If any party hereto fails to pay its contribution, as determined by Area
Council, said entity shall be deemed to have voluntarily withdrawn from
the Area Council.
4. Area Council may be dissolved at ary time and this Agreement
rescinded by a joint agreement executed by COUNTY and CITIES which are
parties hereto. Said rescision Agreement shall provide for the orderly
payment of all outstanding debts and obligations and for the return of
any surplus funds of Area Council in proportion to the contributions made.
JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
PAGE 14
XII. EFFECTIVITY
This Agreement shall take effect upon its execution by the chairman
or mayor and clerks of the governing bodies of the County of San Luis
Obispo and at least four (4) cities, pursuant to resolutions of such
governing bodies authorizing such execution and shall remain in full
force and effect until dissolved pursuant to the provisions herein. This
Agreement may be executed in eight (8) counterparts which together shall
constitute a single agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement
as of the day and year first hereinabove written.
RD/msl/hf/cl/0663-1/111
8-11-87
z -
JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
PAGE 15
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
By: Date:
Mayor
Resolution No.
Clerk
CITY OF ATASCADERO
By: Date:
Mayor
Minute Order
Clerk
CITY OF GROVER CITY
By: Date:
Mayor
Resolution No.
Clerk
CITY OF MORRO BAY
By: Date:
Mayor
Resolution No.
Clerk
CITY OF PASO ROBLES
By: Date:
Mayor
Minute Order
Clerk
CITY OF PISMO BEACH
By: Date
Mayor
Minute Order
Clerk
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
By: Date:
Payor
Resolution No.
Clerk
•
(Resolution 97-87 cont. )
On motion by Councilperson and seconded
by Councilperson the foregoing resolution is
hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ADOPTED:
CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA
By:
BARBARA NORRIS, Mayor
ATTEST: PREPARED BY:
BOYD C. SHARTIZ, City Clerk DAVID G. JO' GENSEN, Director of
Administ atlive Services
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
MICHAEL SHELTON, City Manager JEFFREY G. JORGENSEN, City Attorney
AGREED TO:
STEVE DE CAMP, Representative to
Mid-Management/Professional Unit
•
Y
• M E M O R A N D U M
To:
Mike Shelton, City Manager .
From: David G. Jorgensen, Admin. Svcs. Directo
Date: September 10 , 1987
Subject: Claim of Erica Kip, et al
RECOMMENDATION
City Council deny the above-mentioned claim in the amount
of $25, 000 .00 , which was submitted on August 10, 1987.
BACKGROUND
Claimant seeking damages for injury to three people who
were
ridingin driven a car b claimant at the time of
Y the
accident.
It is noted that this claim has been reviewed by the
Insurance Adjustors and recommended ecommended for denial .
•
L
M E M O R A N D U M
•
TO: City Council September 22, 1987
VIA: Michael Shelton, City Manager
FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director Wr,
SUBJECT: Tentative Parcel Map 23-87
LOCATION: 11605 San Marcos Road
APPLICANT: Tom and Karen Vaughan
REQUEST: To subdivide one parcel containing 10 .55 acres into two
lots containing approximately 5. 2 acres each.
BACKGROUND:
On September 1, 1987 , the Planning Commission conducted a public hear-
ing on the above-referenced subject, unanimously approving the land
division request subject to the findings and conditions contained in
ithe attached staff report.
Tom Vaughan, applicant, spoke in support of the request indicating
that the development of the access road would stabilize an old exist-
ing slide. He added that the driveway into both sites would be under
12% slope.
There was brief discussion by the Commission concerning the site ' s
geology and septic suitability.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approval per the Planning Commission' s recommendation.
HE:ps
cc: Tom and Karen Vaughan
•
r •
CITY OF ATASCADERO Item: B-3 •
STAFF REPORT
FOR: Planning Commission Meeting Date: 9/1/87
BY: p4.psteven L. DeCamp, Senior Planner File No: TPM 23-87
SUBJECT: Request to subdivide one (1) parcel containing 10. 55
acres into two (2) lots containing approximately 5.2 acres each.
A. SITUATION AND FACTS:
1. Applicant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Tom and Karen Vaughn
2. Representative. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Same
3. Project Address. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11605 San Marcos Road
4. Legal Description. . . . . . . . . . . .Lot 2, Block 80, Atas Col.
5. Site Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10. 55 acres
6. Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .RS (2. 5 - 10. 0 ac. min. lot
size)
7. General Plan Designation. . . . .Suburban Single Family
8. Existing Use. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Vacant
9. Environmental Status. . . . . . . . .Negative Declaration posted
August 5, 1987
B. ANALYSIS:
The property proposed for subdivision is located in the RS
(Residential Suburban) zone. Minimum lot size in this zone
ranges between 2. 5 and 10. 0 acres depending upon the "score" of
various performance standards. For this site, the minimum lot
size criteria are:
Distance from center (16, 000 - 18, 000) 0. 60
Septic Suitability (severe) 1 . 50
Average Slope (31% - 35%) 1. 75
Access Condition (paved) 0. 40
Neighborhood Character (4. 75 ac. ) 0. 95
Minimum Lot Size 5. 20 ac.
0 •
Tentative Parcel Map 23-87
September 1, 1987
Page 2
The lot size proposed (5. 2 acres) is equal to the minimum lot
size that would be allowed.
The property proposed for subdivision is very steep with slopes
of between 25% and 48%. These slopes limit residential
development opportunities on the proposed lots. Each lot does
have, however, a site that appears suitable for the construction
of a single family dwelling and septic system. Because of these
steep slopes, the grading required for construction on the new
lots will require Precise Plan review and approval. Precise Plan
review is done at staff level and is dictated by the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and this City' s guidelines for
its implementation.
The slopes on this property appear to be relatively unstable.
For this reason, the applicant was required to submit a
Preliminary Geologic Investigation. This report, which was
prepared June 27, 1987 by Dr. David Chipping, indicates that
considerable care needs to be exercised in the development of the
proposed new lots. The existence of this report will be noted on
the final map to insure future purchasers of the findings of the
report. In addition, it will be recommended that the applicant
be required to construct the access road to the property to
insure conformance with the recommendations of the geologic
report.
Development of this site in conformance with the recommendations
of the geologic report and proper engineering standards will
result in appropriate densities for the site and the surrounding
area. Under no circumstances, however, can staff recommend that
this site ever be further subdivided given the knowledge we now
have of the site's geology and septic suitability.
C. RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends conditional approval of TPM 23-87 based on the
Findings in Exhibit C and the Conditions of Approval in Exhibit
D.
ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A - Location and Zoning
Exhibit B - Tentative Parcel Map
Exhibit C - Findings for Approval
Exhibit D - Conditions of Approval
�Xu1c31T A
: .. . � CITY OF ATASCADERO
11 -. L oGa4,roh n� Zah+n
1814��C! � I I 1978-
` ascn � COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
GA 7Q
i
i
a �
y
'PLS A D -
7&�
\ op6
S I Tc
i
it SZin mal-co3 ��• .o
Pp'
L4. L, A4-as. Lobo„Y
y
D ORP
O
<C i
Qy�
_IS,
EX41517 6
`� -.. . CITY
OF ATASCADERO
`sena : COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT• •-gyp Z3 _ $DEPARTMENT
OTll _
10r2
gJ
F a. N, \t-\ \ ,vP
S �
w
9 0
EXHIBIT C - Findings for Approval .
Tentative Parcel Map 23-87
September 1, 1987
FINDINGS:
1. The creation of these parcels conforms to the Zoning
Ordinance and the General Plan.
2. The creation of these parcels, in conformance with the
recommended Conditions of Approval, will not have a
significant adverse effect upon the environment. The
Negative Declaration prepared for the project is adequate.
3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development
proposed.
4. The site is physically suitable for the density of
development proposed.
5. The design of the subdivision, and the proposed improvements,
will not cause substantial environmental damage or
substantially and avoidably injure fish and wildlife or their
habitat.
6. The design of the subdivision, and the type of improvements,
will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at
large for access through or use of property within the
proposed subdivision; or substantially equivalent alternate
easements are provided.
7. The proposed subdivision complies with Section 66474. 6 of the
State Subdivision Map Act as to methods of handling and
discharge of waste.
EXHIBIT D - Conditions of Approval
Tentative Parcel Map 23-87
September 1, 1987
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. Water shall be obtained from the Atascadero Mutual Water
Company. Water lines shall exist at the frontage of each
parcel or its public utilities easement prior to recordation
of the final map.
2. All existing and proposed utility, pipeline, open space, or
other easements are to be shown on the final map. If there
are building or other restrictions related to the easements,
they shall be noted on the final map.
3. Grading, drainage, and erosion control plans for private
driveways and access easements, prepared by a registered
civil engineer, shall be submitted for review and approval by
the Community Development and Public Works Departments prior
to recordation of the final map.
4. Improvement plans for the proposed private access, prepared
. by a registered civil engineer, shall be submitted to and
approved by the Community Development and Public Works
Departments prior to recordation of the final map. -
5. Construction of the private access and driveways shall be
completed prior to recordation of the final map.
6. An encroachment permit shall be obtained for all work to be
undertaken within the public right-of-way.
7. A road maintenance agreement, in a form acceptable to the
City Attorney, shall be recorded with the deed to each parcel
at the time it is first conveyed. A note to this affect
shall appear on the final map.
8. A note shall appear on the final map indicating the existence
of the Preliminary Geologic Investigation, the author, the
date of preparation, and the fact that the report is on file
in the Community Development Department.
9. The fire hydrant located at the intersection of the proposed
access easement and Los Altos Road shall be upgraded to City
standards prior to recordation of the final map.
10. A final map drawn in substantial conformance with the
approved tentative map and compliance with all conditions
set forth herein shall be submitted for review and approval
in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City Lot
Division Ordinance prior to recordation.
Conditions of Approval
Tentative Parcel Map 23-87
September 1, 1987
Page 2
a. Monuments shall be set at all new property corners
created and a registered civil engineer or licensed land
surveyor shall indicate, by certificate on the final map,
that corners have been set or shall be set by a date specific
and that they will be sufficient to enable the survey to be
retraced.
b. A recently updated preliminary title report shall be
submitted for review in conjunction with the processing of
the final map.
C. A preliminary subdivision guarantee shall be submitted
for review in conjunction with the processing of the final
map.
11. Approval of this tentative map shall expire two years from
the date of final approval unless an extension of time is
granted pursuant to a written request prior to the expiration
date.
I
•
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: City Council September 8, 1987
VIA: Michael Shelton, City Manager 1U .
FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director 4W,
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Final Lot Line Adjustment 10-87
LOCATION: 8435 Curbaril
APPLICANT: James Shearer (Volbrecht Surveys)
• On June 23, 1987 , the City Council approved Lot Line Adjustment
10-87 subject to certain conditions and in concurrence with the
recommendation of the Planning Commission. The required condi-
tions have been complied with and the final lot line adjustment
is recommended for approval.
HE:ps
cc: James Shearer
Volbrecht Surveys
•
1
CITY
OF ATASCADERO T AvQ Loi Lina
,.
tole t97
..i� t97s f.
'D COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AdJ ✓-4mc-,"-' MAP
DEPARTMENT
LLA 10-8?
C Ic
Ki�atzs N<iir �/�C
�• a �
a
Y n
4
O
azii•
t r j
h
. ! C
1� �
• at✓o���
�1
R\
j
p �1
Z
•r 4
--------------------
•
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: City Council September 22, 1987
VIA: Michael Shelton, City Manager { '
FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director MV,
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Final Tract Map 30-86
LOCATION: 8375 Amapoa
APPLICANT: George Salmeron (Cuesta Engineering)
On November 24, 1986 , the City Council approved Tentative Tract
• Map 30-86 subject to certain conditions and in concurrence with
the recommendation of the Planning Commission. The required con-
ditions have been complied with and the final map is recommended
for approval.
HE:ps
cc: George Salmeron
Cuesta Engineering
C-x�4� i3� r ►�
4
a
• 1
0 1
e �
� I
` 1
G1
4�
0
41 2
� h
O N
O
N
Z � 1
O
.1
•
� •A 1
W
1
�c w
H
t
• CITY OF ATASCADERO
CASH ACTIVITY SUMMARY
FOR THE MONTH OF AUGUST, 1987
BEGINNING CASH RESOURCES 3,348,666 .47
ADD:
RECEIPTS 322,064. 00
FUND TRANSFERS 26 ,211.33
INVESTMENTS REDEEMED 220 ,000.00
LESS:
DISBURSEMENTS 559,097 .69
FUND TRANSFERS 26 ,211. 33
INVESTMENTS MADE 220 ,000 .00
ENDING CASH RESOURCES 3 ,111,632.78
SCHEDULE OF CASH RESOURCES Int. Due
AS OF AUGUST 31, 1987 Rate Date
Checking Account:
Mid-State Bank 1,092. 78
Other Investments:
Local Agency Inv. Fund 3,110 ,000 .00 7.46 N/A
• Other Cash Resources:
Petty Cash 540 . 00
TOTAL CASH RESOURCES 3 ,111, 632. 78
Gere Sibbach
City Treasurer
•
4
Y2
CITY OF ATASCADERO
• SCHEDULE OF CASH RECEIPTS AND TRANSFERS IN
FOR THE MONTH OF AUGUST, 1987
CASH RECEIPTS:
Taxes:
Property Tax 24 ,183.64
Sales Tax 122, 400 . 00
Occupancy Tax 727.62
Franchise Tax 2,873.78
Livestock-Head Day Tax 194. 88
Motor Vehicle In-Lieu 60 ,244.36
Cigarette Tax 4,682.30
Weed Abatement
1, 423.38
Development Impact Tax 6,822.50
Other Receipts:
Licenses/Permits/Fees
25,728.69
Fines/Penalties/Overages 849.97
Police Reimbursements 5,192.63
Parks and Recreation Fees 20 ,136.96
Gas Tax 5,000.00
Traffic Safety 5,952.34
Local Transportation 1, 453.35
Development Fees 3 ,380. 30
Zoo Receipts• 4,359.81 Rents/Concessions 251.61
Contribution-Life Support 3,100 .00
Sales-Maps/Publications/Reports 254.10
Special Police Services 733. 85
TOTAL CASH RECEIPTS 299,946 .07
FUND TRANSFERS IN:
Sanitation Administrative Charge 5,582.33
Zoo Administrative Charge 1, 000. 00
Contribution to General Fund 19,629.00
TOTAL FUND TRANSFERS IN 26 ,211.33
OTHER CASH RECEIPTS:
Performance Bonds 14,500. 00
Planning Permit Deposits 1, 580.00
Reimbursement to Expense 1, 314. 59
Refunds 4, 723. 34
TOTAL OTHER CASH RECEIPTS 22,117.93
CITY OF ATASCADERO
SCHEDULE OF DISBURSEMENTS
FOR THE MONTH OF AUGUST, 1987
DISBURSEMENTS:
Hand Warrant Register for August, 1987 22,177 . 31
08/07/87 Accounts Payable Warrants 134, 002. 76
08/14/87 Accounts Payable Warrants 43,610 . 57
08/21/87 Accounts Payable Warrants 72, 647.16
08/28/87 Accounts Payable Warrants 107,475 .33
Service Charge-Mastercard/Visa 2. 50
08/05/87 Payroll Checks #40051-40171 91,456 .04
08/19/87 Payroll Checks #40172-40289 87 ,830 .18
TOTAL 559 ,201. 85
LESS:
Voided Check #36272 24. 16
Voided Check #36322 80 . 00
TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS 559, 097. 69
•
I, DAVID JORGENSEN, do hereby certify and declare
that demands enumerated and referred to in the foregoing
register are accurate and just claims against the City and
that there are funds available for payment thereof in the
City Treasury. The breakdown detail on all accounts is
available for your viewing in the Finance office.
L)
DAVID J ' ENSEN
Admin. �e vices Director
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: City Council September 22, 1987
VIA: Michael Shelton, City Manager
FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director V,�q,
SUBJECT: Zone Change 11-87
LOCATION: 8485 El Corte (Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Eaglet #2)
APPLICANT: Initiated by City of Atascadero
REQUEST: To revise the zoning map designation from RMF-4 (PD6) to
RSF-Z.
BACKGROUND:
This re-zoning was initiated by the City Council on July 28, 1987 to
restore pre-existing development rights on property included within an
• adjoining planned development re-zoning.
On September 1, 1987 , the Planning Commission conducted a public hear-
ing on this request, unanimously recommending approval of the zone
change request as outlined in the attached staff report. There was
discussion and public testimony given as reflected in the attached
minutes excerpt.
RECOMMENDATION
Concur with the Planning Commission' s recommendation and (1) read by
title only and (2) approve Ordinance No. 158 for first reading.
HE:ps
ATTACHMENTS: Staff Report - September 1, 1987
Minutes Excerpt - September 1, 1987
Ordinance No. 158
cc: Steven N. Cool
Hap Brenizer
Ray Bunnell
Steven A. Sweet
City of Atascadero Item: B-2
STAFF REPORT
FOR: Planning Commission Meeting Date: 9/1/87
BY: nAteven L. DeCamp, Senior Planner File No: ZC 11-87
Project Address: 8485 E1 Corte (Lts. 1 & 2, Blk. 1, Eaglet #2)
SUBJECT:
Request to revise the Zoning Map designation on the subject
property from RMF-4 (PD 6) to RSF-Z.
BACKGROUND:
In May of 1986, the City Council approved General Plan, Zoning
Ordinance, and Zoning Map amendments affecting the subject
property. The project for which the zoning (and Planned
Development Overlay) were designed will not involve these lots.
Because these lots will not benefit from the existing zoning,
reversion to the prior zone designation should be accomplished.
A. SITUATION AND FACTS: •
1. Applicant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .City of Atascadero
2. Site Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 acres
3. Streets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .El Corte is a paved,
City-maintained street
4. Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .RMF-4 (PD 6)
5. General Plan Designation. . . . . . . .Low Density Multiple
family
6. Existing Use. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Lot 1 : SFR and barn
Lot 2: Vacant
7. Environmental Status. . . . . . . . . . . .Negative Declaration
posted August 12, 1987
B. ANALYSIS:
In 1985, the ACOMA Corporation (Bill Poe) approached the City
with a proposal for redevelopment of the old mushroom farm on E1
Corte. The original proposal envisioned the construction of
seventy-two (72) dwelling units on the flatter portions of the
site, and reservation of the higher elevations in an open-space
• 0
. Zone Change 11-87
September 1 , 1987
Page 2
easement. This plan consisted of approximately twenty-two (22)
acres and included Lots 3 through 10 in Block 1, Eaglet No. 2.
During the process of reviewing this development proposal, the
possibility of adding additional area to the project was
discussed. When the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance amendments
were initiated, the study area was expanded to include two
additional, adjacent lots (Lots 1 and 2) . The study area,
therefore, consisted of thirty-two (32) acres and included all of
the area within the City east of E1 Corte.
At the conclusion of the public hearing process, the General Plan
designation for the property was changed from Low Density Single
Family to Low Density Multiple Family. The zoning on the
property was also changed from RSF-Z to RMF-4 (PD 6) . These
designations provide for a density shift to allow for the
construction of an average of four (4) units per acre on the
lower elevations. The conditions of the Planned Development
over-lay require that all construction on the property be held
below the 960 foot contour line. An open space easement is to be
established above that elevation as a part of future development
review.
Lots 1 and 2, which as noted above were added to the study area,
lie almost entirely above the 960 foot elevation. These lots
are, therefore, virtually undevelopable under the currently
imposed zoning. At the time of the original rezoning to RMF-4
(PD 6) , it was thought that these to lots might become part of
the larger project to the south and would be utilized to increase
the allowable number of units in that project. Because of that,
the requirement for an open-space easement was not considered to
be detrimental. It has now been determined, however, that these
lots will not be part of the mushroom farm redevelopment. For
this reason, the current zoning designation is not appropriate
for these lots.
Prior to the rezoning approved in 1986, Lots 1 and 2 were zoned
RSF-Z, which requires a minimum lot size of between 1. 5 and 2. 5
acres depending on the site' s "score" on various performance
standards. This designation was based on the steepness of the
property, the lack of sewer availability, and access conditions.
As part of the larger adjacent project, and given the
restrictions of the Planned Development over-lay, these site
characteristics were not critical in determining an appropriate
size for these lots. When these lots are viewed individually,
however, those same characteristics are critical in determining
• suitable lot sizes. For this reason, reversion of the zoning for
Lots 1 and 2 to RSF-Z appears most appropriate. This zone
s •
Zone Change 11-87
September 1, 1987
Page 3
designation will allow reasonable development of the property in
keeping with the intent of the General Plan and in conformance
with the general character of the surrounding area.
It should be noted that this currently proposed zone change does
not require a concurrent General Plan amendment. The density of
development that could occur under the RSF-Z zone designation
would not exceed that allowed by the Low Density Multiple Family
General Plan designation. This lower level of density would not
be inconsistent with the General Plan designation. Any future
change in the General Plan can be accommodated as part of the
current General Plan Revision Program.
C. RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of Zone Change 11-87 reverting the zone
designation of Lots 1 and 2 of Block 1, Eaglet No. 2 from RMF-4
(PD 6) to RSF-Z as shown in the attached draft ordinance.
ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A - Location and Zoning Map
Exhibit B - 960 Foot Contour Map
Exhibit C - Staff Report: GP 1C-85 & ZC 3-85
Exhibit D - Draft Ordinance
EKA151 T A
., ��!' CITY OF ATASCADERO Lo�a��on nd Zanin
, 197•-7
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Z G 11 - 0-7
• DEPARTMENT
ITE
a /
811$S E1 COY` a,
L*>. 14 Z; elk. I C-'Jk IAV
�Z
j
7 • /
(PD ,
'RS F O
00 \
9464
/bOs. ` \
</
NTS O a_ • \���Y'
�
P
\ Q,
i
r°
C'T
0 E)NIBIT s
�, .,.. ,... . CITY OF ATASCADERO '940 Foo+ C-Ok4our-
` sCAD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ZG ( I - el
DEPARTMENT
Y
61TE V-3 A
ti 940'
b 3
A
Ni
Q�
O°
v
brb ObJ 6.
J
��Xl�►�31 i G
c-BS
Zc 3-85
City of Atascadero
STAFF REPORT
FOR: Planning Commission Meeting Date: 3/31/86
BY: Steven L. DeCamp, Senior Planner File No: GP 1C-85 and
ZC 3-85
Project Address: 8555 E1 Corte
SUBJECT:
Request to revise the existing General Plan land use map and zoning
map from Low Density Single Family (RSF-Z) to Low Density Multiple
Family (RMF-4) with a Planned Development (PD) overlay.
BACKGROUND:
The applicants are requesting an amendment to both the general plan
land use map and the zoning ordinance text and map from low density
single family to low density multiple family with a planned develop-
ment overlay. This proposal was continued from the last general plan
amendment cycle at the applicant' s request.
Notice of public hearing was published in the Atascadero News on Fri-
day, March 21, 1986 and all property owners of record located within
300 feet of the subject property were notified on . that March 20, 1986 .
A. LOCATION: 8555 El Corte (Lots 1-10 , Block 1, Eaglet No. 2)
B. SITUATION AND FACTS:
1. Request. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .General plan and zoning ordi-
nance from Low Density Single
Family to Low Density Multiple
Family designation.
2. Applicant. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .ACOMA Corporation
3. Site Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 acres
4. Streets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .El Corte is a paved (18-20 feet)
City-maintained street
5. Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .RSF-Z (Residential Single Family
1. 5 - 2. 5 acre minimum lot size)
6. Existing Use. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Partially vacant/warehouse
(former Mushroom Farm)
r
General Plan Amendme� lC-85/Zone Change 3-85 #MA/Poe)
7. Adjacent Zoning and Use to. . .North: RSF-Y
Entire Study Area South: Golf course (San Luis
County)
East: Golf course (SLO County)
West: RSF-Y
8 . General Plan Designation. . . . .Low Density Single Family
9. Terrain. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Flat at the lower elevations to
steep at higher elevations
10. Environmental Status. . . . . . . . .Negative Declaration
C. ANALYSIS:
The minimum lot size in the RSF-Z zoning district is 1. 5 to 2. 5
acres depending upon the site' s "score" based on various perfor-
mance standards. This zone does not envision the availability of
sanitary sewer service. The proposal for low density multiple
family zoning would more than quadruple allowed densities in the
area. There are, however , factors that tend to mitigate the ef-
fects of this increased level of density.
Surrounding Uses:
The property to the south and to the east of the subject parcels
is the Chalk Mountain Golf Course. This large expanse of open
space will lessen the impact of higher densities on the adjacent
parcels by maintaining low overall area densities.
The parcels to the west of the subject site have been recommended
by the Planning Commission for redesignation to RSF-W (10,000
square foot lots) . Although the RSF-W zone is for single family
dots, the applicant' s proposed RMF-4 zoning designation would
result in similar overall densities (4 units/acre) . The property
would not, therefore, be an island of higher density surrounded
by low density uses.
Site Design:
The applicant is proposing a planned residential development em-
bodying significant areas of open space. The applicant has pro-
posed, and an open space easement will assure, that the upper por-
tion of the slopes on the site will remain open. Building heights
and location on the site will be controlled to the same end. Each
of these considerations will lessen the visual impacts.
Public Services:
Sanitary sewer service is currently available to only one of the
parcels proposed for redesignation. the entire site .is, however ,
within the Urban Service Line and could be annexed to the sewer
district. Because of the terrain on and surrounding the site, and
the number of dwelling units possible, the developer will be re-
quired to provide off-site sewer system improvements. These im-
provements will be designed as part of the master plan of develop-
ment for the site.
2
C
General Plan AmendmeV 1C-85/Zone Change 3-85 (APMA/Poe)
. Access to the site from E1 Camino Real via La Linia Avenue, Cas-
cada Road and/or Arcade Road is of concern to staff. Each of
these roads is paved but narrow. Traffic flows are currently
light and adequate capacity exits for some additional development.
The cumulative impact of this project and others approved in sur-
rounding areas must be considered, however . The recommended re-
designation of adjacent areas for 10 , 000 square foot lots could
result in an excess of eighty-five (85) new lots. Not all of
these potential new lots would impact the roads mentioned here,
but when added to the seventy-two (72) dwelling units proposed by
the applicant in the RMF-4 zone, impacts could be of concern.
This issue could be addressed by requiring a master plan of devel-
opment with appropriate offsite improvement requirements identi-
fied and imposed. These may include, but not be limited to,
street, drainage, and sewer system improvements.
A related issue to that discussed above is the question of access
from this site and surrounding areas onto E1 Camino Real. Traffic
generated by build-out of the area between E1 Camino Real and the
golf course could trigger the need for a traffic signal at one of
the side streets and E1 Camino Real. This site ' s contribution to
future traffic loads will be identified in a circulation proposed
to be completed as part of the master plan of development prior to
building permit applications. Appropriate fees will be levied
prior to the eventual issuance of building permits.
. A redesignation of the affected property to low density multiple
family would allow for development that appears to be appropriate
for the site. The preparation of a master plan of development
will provide an opportunity to assure design which is suitable for
the neighborhood and which assures that the development contrib-
utes its fair share to necessary neighborhood improvements.
D. RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of General Plan Amendment 1C-85 and Zone
Change 3-85 based on the findings contained in Exhibits E and F.
SLD:ps
ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A - Location Map
Exhibit B - Existing General Plan Map
Exhibit C - Existing Zoning Map
Exhibit D - Site Plan .
Exhibit E - Draft Resolution
Exhibit F - Draft Ordinance
Exhibit G- - Supplemental Statement
3
Ali
�- \ -� a i►
`MINI .�a� �l��/�]�i•� :� �//��ri
. .aa�.0��t+ wf��� � ���,•• .hh` Ic- :'3\i mss✓
Iwo
was
.•r�i� ,'�
itamiss`.• ��•1�� ;����ip/�/� hy���; ® ♦���4
r.
_ .int•'�''%s;�p`�' !�l= \�, y `�.I ����
-�•.a .•.� �.��•��,� ���jj�l..� �, y��
92-
SIR•� 'RI
RMA W1010 ra
4 �• 1
II mileNis low
rig
♦ tip► ''
• EXHIBIT C
EXISTING ZONING MAP
•
• ,titr -n°,• 31.E �` z Ia 9 fa •�`��_ ___._.-_..._. _.__...... __ ____._._._._ .. __
S, • l�s A , ref orb
SITE
`gee ��•. /,r' ,'`` e,;� . n Z C 3-85
8555 EL CORTE
r� •,L `. J •rl . 6° fit• •40.� �
`.7 I {`�e fit• ^4, • t'• +'
e,•'• �. 7 ° � h L p z�'a rr4 vy;• •••ICS 7 e ,
','. dd'��y v"'�).`�1''"3 'tie, 3 ' �'``•.` ��,•a i-•
h •ea •y may'X :1 y,.'� ,� e ;�-:
f-C ,
�LWS'p I
�4 G .✓� M ,•:d Jam\.n`�` •'�j—ww i2oYi� _5 �,,,.
<, ae S r-e.- 2. y, seJ �,vg. c
+4 q" ,4.,
a4 •• Pff rr
a� to. J` •+'•° tra}_,�o ?.:Sir •s !4• :1:1 ..
co 7h377�'t°
•lo-e , 16 ✓. 26 t •' II x to - -
°. X 4•; i7 a� +
♦+ �' •+�. 9; °°! I•I S S ,.28 •\ jeUsSS Yob 'b,6••� '
`yam �;f ,,r i•�D�-_ •\
t.r ) Cis W •16 tl' 3
31'Cr
JV•�'r/ •.,I -'i .h/ +I.Ott 'A• t ,
16
ur� a
` �_ •,+t: is� ,. •'�� �p�' )�' i ,e+a::_ •t ��+ f 5, war••.f;.�'D `\• �r{
43
t+rh�;"y`'f� , r r°� 3 10-a :'Y ♦�{ •' t ,,•s'• �'��>' s 1,}�-• ,c Cj Nov
`• ;°:, to-e i Ib! 2 "! i1 e u M!r. 0p,• :O',+ •°;,.,•7, ���
V
�� -\ -�-- tea• \n �i
1
pn
. - H Pa
r •
co
1\ ,ti • . � � 1 II Q
. I
0 . Exhibit G
General Plan Amendment and Zone Change RSY-Z to RSY-POD 4
8555 E1 Corte Road
Adult Plan Unit Development: The idea of this project is to provide
an alternative environment for active adults.
Designed by Barry Berkus AIA, founder and president of Berkus Group
Architects, a national firm of architects and planners with headquarters
in Santa Barbara, Newport Beach, and Washington D.C.
Lifestyle is the key word for this planned unit development,,- a
retiree who doesn't feel like retiring. The idea for this project was
taken from his Leisure Village Ocean Hills, the 1985 Gold Nugget Award
of Merit for the best low density development. The site plan was
cautiously laid out to take advantage.of the views of Chalk Mountain
Golf Course and the distant Santa Lucia Range, yet it doesn't impose
on the hillside. Using open space and a height limitation (approximately
960') means almost 65% of this development will be landscaped, common
area or open space.
With the abandonment of La Linia and a stucco wall along El Corte,
the development creates its own environment within. One entrance and
cart access to the golf course helps to accentuate this. This is the
same effect Berkus created with Leisure Village. The Spanish style
stucco and tile roofs make one think of a small Mediterranean hillside
village.
This project will be a compliment to the neighborhood and a welcome
addition to one of Atascadero's most beautiful assets, Chalk Mountain
Golf Course.
THIS PROJECT IS PRESENTED BY
ACOMA CORPORATION
Bill Poe
President
•
3
EXHIBIT D
ORDINANCE NO. 158
AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ATASCADERO AMENDING SECTION MAP NUMBER
19 OF THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAPS OF THE CITY
OF ATASCADERO BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY AT
8485 EL CORTE FROM RMF-4 (PD6) (RESIDENTIAL
MULTIFAMILY (PD6) ) TO RSF-Z (RESIDENTIAL SINGLE
FAMILY, 1. 5 - 2. 5 ACRE MINIMUM)
(ZONE CHANGE 11-87 : 8485 EL CORTE)
WHEREAS, the proposed zoning map amendment is consistent with the
General Plan as required by Section 65860 of the California Government
Code; and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendment is in conformance with Section
65800 et seq. of the California Government Code concerning zoning reg-
ulations; and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendment will not have a significant ad-
verse impact upon the environment. The Negative Declaration prepared
for the project is adequate; and
WHEREAS, the Atascadero Planning Commission held a public hearing
on September 1, 1987 and has recommended approval of Zone Change
11-87.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Atascadero does ordain
as follows:
Section 1. Council Findings.
1. The proposal is compatible with the surrounding land use and
zoning.
2. The proposal is consistent with the General Plan.
3. The proposal will not result in any significant adverse en-
vironmental impacts. The Negative Declaration prepared for
the project is adequate.
Section 2. Zoning Map.
Map Number 19 of the Official Zoning Maps of the City of Atasca-
dero on file in the City Community Development Department is hereby
amended to reclassify the area shown on the attached Exhibit "A" " from
RMF-4 (PD6) (Residential Multiple Family) to RSF-Z (Residential Single
Family, 1. 5 - 2. 5 acre minimum) .
1
Ordinance No. 158
Section 3. Publication.
The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published once
within fifteen (15) days after its passage in the Atascadero News, a
newspaper of general circulation, printed, published, and circulated
in the City in accordance with Section 36933 of the Government Code;
shall certify the adopting and posting of this ordinance and shall
cause this ordinance and this certification together with proof of
posting to be entered into the Book of Ordinances of this City.
Section 4 . Effective Date.
This ordinance shall go into effect and be in full force and ef-
fect at 12:01 a.m. on the 31st day after its passage.
On motion by and seconded by
the motion was approved by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
DATE ADOPTED:
By:
BARBARA NORRIS, Mayor
City of Atascadero, California
ATTEST:
BOYD C. SHARITZ, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
MICHAEL SHELTON, City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
JEFFREY G. JORGENSEN, City Attorney
PREPARED BY:
HENRY ENGE ,
Community velopme Director
2
EX44► B1^i' A
CITY � i-58
OF ATASCADERO oYd ��a���
—1sc1►n � COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTl � -
�� DEPARTMENT
aye �` ESPN <0�•9���*�� \\
rb \,
WE S�TG
RN,t=—q LPDG� }-p TZ17�— Z
_ Zaka. GkzcK_lc, 11-8-7
�E
m 4b v • SPD
I
o00,
C NTS O a,\��%3� • ��,.\,Oen
1
� O
.oR�
v
^�F C T �.
! •
Minutes - Planning Commission - September 1, 1987
Mr. DeCamp ed that the applicant as submitted revised plans
and are works with staff to his regard. He asked that this
matter be continue o the CoKocsomplete
sion meeting of September 15,
1987 in order for ff its final review on these
revised plans.
MOTION: Made by Co ssioner Hat 11, seconded by Commissioner
Copelan d carried unanimou to continue the hearing
on G eral Plan Amendment 2C- nd Zone Change 6-87 to
Sep mber 15, 1987.
2. Zone Change 11-87 :
Request initiated by the City of Atascadero to revert the
existing zone designation of RMF-4 (PD6) - Residential Multi-
ple Family (Planned Development #6) to the prior designation
of RSF-Z - Residential Single Family, 1. 5 - 2. 5 acre minimum
lot size. Subject site is located at 8485 E1 Corte in the
City of Atascadero, legal description being Lots 1 and 2;
Block 1 of Eaglet Tract #2.
Mr. DeCamp presented the staff report and provided a background
on the previous general plan amendment and zoning change approvals
which took place in May, 1986 . It was noted that since the sub-
ject lots are not a part of the planned development, reversion to
the prior zoning designation is in order.
In response to question from Commissioner Hatchell, Mr. DeCamp
explained how the subject lots (1 and 2) came to be included
within the original project. Mr . DeCamp answered several ques-
tions for the Commission and it was noted that staff has been
working with the applicant on a specific development plan for the
remaining portions of the site (lots 3 through 10) .
Steve Cool, attorney from Arroyo Grande and speaking for Don Rob-
inson, owner of Lot 2, concurred with staff ' s background analysis.
He clarified that there was never any type of agreement between
Mr. Robinson and ACOMA Corporation relating to sale of the proper-
ty or including it within an overall development. He asked the
Commission for approval of a zoning designation that would allow
two units per acre (or a maximum 10 units for the 5 acre lot) .
Hap Brenizer from Grover City, speaking on behalf of Mr . Robinson,
pointed out that Lots 1 and 2 were added to the PD just prior to
the Commission' s approval of the project, and spoke about his
understanding of what steps took place at the March 31, 1986
Commission meeting (minutes excerpts were distributed to the Com-
mission) .
Mr . DeCamp clarified that staff' s understanding at the time of
review of the project was that Lots 1 and 2 could be included with
the remaining portions of the project and that they would be dev-
eloped under the same PD6 zoning (which would allow for no devel-
opment above the 960 foot elevation) . Mr . DeCamp emphasized that
the revision to the study area that included Lots 1 and 2 along
2
0 0
Minutes - Planning Commission - September 1, 1987
with Lots 3 through 10 was made approximately 6 to 9 months prior
to the Commission ' s action approving the zone change (Lots 1 and 2
were not added to the project a matter of weeks before the Commis-
sion hearing as implied by Mr . Brenizer) .
Mr. Engen added that the owner of Lot 1 was notified of the new
zone change application.
In response to question from Commissioner Hatchell, Mr. Engen
explained that a meeting was held with staff and Mr . Robinson, et
al, concerning the feasibility of development with this PD zoning.
It was their general consensus that Lots 1 and 2 are not needed
for the development of the property. This proposed reversion back
to the original zoning was initiated by the City Council after
considering Mr. Cool' s request for higher density. Two units per
acre is too dense for this steep property.
Mr. DeCamp pointed out that staff has now instituted a policy
change of requiring each property owner to sign an application
when there is a PD involved. Commissioner Michielssen concurred
with this.
Commissioner Bond spoke on his recollection of the March 31, 1986
meeting and noted that he would not have a problem with reverting
back to the original RSF-Z zoning.
MOTION: Made by Commissioner Bond, seconded by Commissioner
Lopez-Balbontin and carried on a 7 :0 roll call vote to
recommend approval of Zone Change 11-87 as outlined in
the staff report.
3. Ten tive Parcel Map 23-87:
Reque initiated by Tom Vaughan to al],ow subdivision of
10. 55 res into two lots containing approximately 5. 2 acres
each. Sub 'ect site is located at 11,605 San Marcos Road;
legal descr ' tion being Lot 2 i� Block 80 in Atascadero
Colony.
Mr. DeCamp presented th staff rep t on this land division re-
cquestould recommending Condit nal proval. He emphasized that staff
could not recommend that thi ite ever be further subdivided
given the site ' s geology and tic suitability.
Tom Vaughan, applicant, poke in support of the request and
stated that in addit ' n to the geo gic study that was prepared,
Dr . ChippZ
of geologic r ort) indicated that the
developmeaccess road would tabilize an old existing
slide. Hthe driveway into bot sites would be under
12%.
Commissonsked for clarification on t location forthe prop ad. Discussion followed.
3
71
• "
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: City Council September 22, 1987
VIA: Michael Shelton, City Manager
FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director X
SUBJECT: General Plan Amendment 2A-87 and Zone Change 4-87
LOCATION: 8500 El Dorado
APPLICANT: Joe and Mary Lindsey (Donald Funk)
REQUEST: To revise the existing General Plan land use designation
from High Density Single Family to Low Density Multiple
Family, and to revise the existing zoning from RSF-X to
RMF-4 (PD7) to allow for a 20 lot, small lot subdivision.
BACKGROUND:
• On August 4, 1987 and August 18 , 1987 , the Planning Commission conduc-
ted public hearings on the above-referenced subject. On a - final 4:2
vote, the Commission recommended denial of the request as outlined in
the findings for denial contained in the attached staff report. There
was considerable discussion and public testimony given as reflected in
the attached minutes excerpts.
RECOMMENDATION:
Concur with the Planning Commission' s recommendation to deny General
Plan Amendment 2A-87 and Zone Change 4-87 based on the findings con-
tained in Exhibit D.
HE:ps
ATTACHMENTS: Staff Report - August 4 & 18, 1987
Minutes Excerpt - August 4, 1987
Minutes Excerpt - August 18, 1987
Neighborhood Petition - August 1, 1987
Letter from Art Cunningham - September 14, 1987
cc: Joe and Mary Lindsey
Donald Funk
•
City of Atascadero Item: B-2
STAFF REPORT
FOR: Planning Commission Meeting Date: 8/4/87
8/18/87
BY: Joel Moses, Associate Planner File No: GP 2A-87
ZC 4 -87
Project Address: 8500 El Dorado
SUBJECT:
Request to revise the existing General Plan land use designation from
High Density Single Family to Low Density Multiple Family, and to re-
vise the existing zoning from RSF-X to RMF-4 (PD7) to allow for a 20
lot small lot subdivision.
A. SITUATION AND FACTS:
1. Applicant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Joseph and Mary Lindsey
2. Representative. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Donald Funk
3. Site Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4.7 acres
4. Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .RSF-X (Residential Single Fam- •
ily, 20 ,000 square foot minimum
lot size with sewer)
5. Existing Use. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Vacant lot
6. Adjacent Zoning and Use. . . . . .North: LSF-X, residential
South: RSF-X, residential
East: RSF-X, vacant, residen.
West: vacant, shopping center
7. General Plan Designation. . . . .High Density Single Family
8. Environmental Status. . . . . . . . .Negative Declaration posted
July 8, 1987
B. ANALYSIS:
Over the past several years, the subject site has been reviewed
several times for increases in residential density. On both
occasions, staff recommended approval of an increase in density.
In both instances, staff noted that the General Plan policies and
existing land use patterns would support the increased density.
The area is presently served by sewer and increased density can be•
handled by the system.
General Plan Amendment 2A -87/Zone Change 4-87 (Lindsey/Funk)
Some concern was expressed about traffic generation. It was noted
that the expected traffic generation from the project will be
within the capacity of the streets used by the project. Problems
do exist and will continue to exist with turning movements along
E1 Camino Real until a traffic light is installed in the area.
The applicant' s present proposal is to revise the 4 .7 acre site' s
existing General Plan designation from High Density Single Family
to Low Density Multiple Family. The corresponding zone change
would revise the existing zoning from RSF-X (20, 000 square foot
minimum lot size due to sewer being available) to RMF-10 (PD7) .
The Planned Development proposes to create 20 residential lots
from the 4 . 7 acre site with 20,000 square foot lots along E1 Dor-
ado and 17 smaller lots to the west with an average lot size of
8,000 square feet. Staff notes that the three lots along E1 Dor-
ado meet the current zoning requirements. The remaining lots on
3.3 acres would exceed the current density standards and would
specifically require a General Plan density revision along with a
Planned Development overlay (Exhibit B) .
The current Zoning Ordinance standards would allow for a three
bedroom unit at a density of 5.0 units per acre on a 0-10% slope.
Using only the smaller lot area, a total of 17, 3-bedroom units
could be constructed on the smaller area. The applicant proposes
17 units for development. In using the larger area of 4.7 acres
at the same rate, a total of 24 units could be built where the
applicant is proposing a total of 20 lots. The site plan would,
thus, meet the minimums of the Zoning Ordinance.
In reviewing the specific site design, staff has received several
major comments that affect the site ' s design. The current design
allows for a cul-de-sac for the higher density area aligning with
Cascada Road. The access to this area along Cascada would be di-
rectly to El Camino Real.
In reviewing the neighborhood ' s circulation, broader questions and
answers are observed. Recently, the City received and denied a
request to close Solano Road, one of for access to the neighbor-
hood area (bounded by Arcade, E1 Camino Real, La Linia, and El
Dorado) . The City is also currently reviewing two projects in the
area (Poe and Peterson) . In reviewing the proposed closure a
traffic report was made noting the need for a traffic light in the
area. Currently Solano and La Linia connect within a short dis-
tance from El Camino Real, and both are heavily used for commer-
cial and residential traffic. Arcade connects to the rear of the
neighborhood while Cascada runs a block back from E1 Camino and
dead ends into E1 Centro that is impassible to the south. To the
east of the site is Santa Fe Road runs one block from E1 Corte to
E1 Dorado. By extending Cascada on through the site, the circula-
tion of the entire neighborhood could be improved. This improve-
ment would benefit not only the neighborhood, but would fit into a
current proposal to extend E1 Centro through to Palomar and in-
stall a traffic light at the intersection of E1 Camino Real and
Palomar.
2
0 0
General Plan Amendment 2A-87/Zone Change 4 -87 (Lindsey/Funk)
As previously discussed in past staff reports, the establishment
of a Planned Development Overlay requires specific findings (Sec-
tion 9-3. 644) . Two of these findings can be made with no real
problem. The modification of development standards is warranted
to promote orderly and harmonious development, and benefits de-
rived from the overlay zone cannot be reasonably achieved through
existing development standards. The two remaining findings and
that modification of the development standards will enhance and
best utilize the characteristics of the area, and that the plans
offer certain redeeming features to compensate for required modi-
fications can not be made unless changes in the plans are
made.
The applicant proposes to provide affordable housing due to the
smaller lots. Staff agrees that this might be the case, but the
site' s location and its potential development within the neighbor-
hood presents the opportunity to resolve a circulation problem.
The extension of Cascada would make these required findings
easier.
Outside comments have been received and reviewed with the propos-
al. The utilities have noted no problem in the proposal only in-
dicating standard development requirements of utility easements.
City departments have also responded with standard comments con-
cerning conformance to City codes at time of development. Other
comments related to the need to extend Cascada and access and
design of the cul-de-sac were also received. Other specific con-
ditions of development would be reviewed at the time of subdivi-
sion per the PD-7 overlay conditions (Exhibit D) .
In summary, staff' s analysis would find support for a density re-
vision per the General Plan and zoning. The specific design would
not meet the needs of the neighborhood or the community. A
revised site plan with through access of Cascada could be
supported.
C. RECOMMENDATION:
Based on the proposed application and site design, staff recom-
mends denial of General Plan amendment 2A-87 and Zone Change 4 -87
based on the findings contained in Exhibit D.
JM:ps
ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A - Location Map
Exhibit B - Site Plan
Exhibit C - Developer ' s Statement
Exhibit D - PD-7 Conditions
Exhibit E - Findings for Denial
3
CITY _
��_; : .• • . �.�, F RTAS CADERO EXHIBIT A - LOCATION MAP
rim
`Sscan � COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT G.P. AMENDMENT GP: 2A-87
DEPARTMENT ZONE CHANGE ZC: 4 -87
8500 E1 Dorado Road
■
SITE 8500 E1 Dorado Road •
• `\
� High Den. Sing. Family to
Low Den. Multi Family
RSF-X to RMF/5 (PD-7) � \_
(Lindsey & Funk)
M
yq \ -- i M SPD ,
O
AVad
Q �
- it E� '•O ^a'- • �y • `�
� o
i
9s
qV ..
cA.S
CT
C R-
cr
� qP
Z p•C�" AVE
i
�- 00
o
00
J �d A tiI
it
N /
b -
� \z
y CITY F ATASCADERO -
�� ��_� EXHIBIT B SITE PLAN
�rascan COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT G•P• ENDMENT GP:2 —
^ DEPARTMENT ZONE CHANGE ZC: 1.-8
8500 E1 Dorado Road
(Lindsey/Funk)
W �
-,\ w;
... wI
<H�
!. 1
� Ii f S: J 10 _
�• ��� f., , �� z r 3�
,`r 1 `l L_� •`L
Z I I 1 UI-(
p \ y I —77
U
£ \ \\\111 \ � •.`,_ J �'' .
`1
n
g1 I l• 'S J
CITY EXHIBIT C LEVEL. STATEM.
CITY OF ATASCADERO
,gs , G.P. AMENDMENT GP: 2A-87
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ZONE CHANGE ZC: 4-87
DEPARTMENT 8500 EL DORADO
�.
DONALD J.FUNK -
Planning and Design 1606 Valley View Lane
P.O.Box 6291
Los Osos,.CA 93412
(805)528-0632
March 27, 1987
Joel Moses
Community Development Department
City os Atascadero
6500 Palma Ave.
Atascadero, CA 93422
RE: Proposed amendment of approx. 3.33 acre portion of 4.7
acre property, Lindsey
Dear Joel,
Attached is the proposed development layout for a 20 unit
single-family project located northeast of E1 Centro. The
project involves two phases: three - 20,000 square foot
lots along E1 Dorado and 17 - 8,000 average square foot
lots to be located nearest El Centro. We propose to leave
the northeast 60,000 square feet as RSF-X zoning and amend
the zoning for the remaining 3.3 acres to RMF/5 (5 units per
acre) .
The proposed plan is designed to maximize protection of the
existing oak trees by reducing the amount of impermeable paving
surfaces and careful street and lot design. The project is
designed to fit the natural terrain and produce a quiet and
pleasing environment for the residents. Architectural renderings
are being prepared which will describe the traditional
architectural theme for the homes.
We have appreciated your assistance in developing a plan
that should be an asset to the community and perhaps might
set a precedent for future development adjacent to shopping
centers.
If you have any questions, please call.
S)na
rely,
�Dd J. Funk
irilr(IE.IVE, D
MAR 301987
COMMUP1ITY DEVELOPMUIT
EXHIBIT D P.D.-7 CONDITIC
CITY O1, •P• AMENDMENT GP: 2-87
A: :,7; .� ATASCADERO ZONE CHANGE ZC: 4-87
r's'•'�■ '97. 7 8500 E1 Dorado Road
` CAD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT •
9-3.651. Establishment of Planned Development Overlay Zone
No. 7 (PD7) . The Planned Development Overlay Zone No. 7 is
established as shown on the official zoning maps (Section
9-1. 102).. The following development standards are established:
a. The Master Plan of Development of the site is approved as
shown on Exhibit B which is hereby made a part of this
ordinance by reference. . All construction and development
shall be done in conformance with the approved Exhibit.
Any modification in density will require a rezoning. Mod-
ification of the Master Plan site design may be approved
in a manner prescribed for a Conditional Use Permit (Sec-
tion 9-2.109).
b. In approving a Master Plan of Development, the level of
processing for subsequent projects or phases may be re-
duced to a Plot Plan provided that the Master Plan contains
sufficient detail to support such a determination.
C. No subsequent Plot Plan, Precise Plan, Conditional Use Per-
mit, or Tentative Parcel or Tract Map shall be approved
unless found to be consistent with the approved Master Plan
of Development. Any amendment to a Master Plan of Develop-
ment, including conditions thereof, shall be accomplished
as set forth in Subsection (a) of this Section.
0 •
General Plan Amendment 2A- 87/Zone Change 4-87 (Lindsey/Funk)
EXHIBIT E - Findings for Denial
General Plan Amendment 2C-87/Zone Change 4 -87
August 4, 1987
FINDINGS:
1. The proposed General Plan land use map amendment would conform to
the existing land use element General Plan policies.
2. Modification of development standards or processing requirements
would not enhance the opportunity to best utilize special charac-
teristics of an area and will not have a beneficial effect on the
area.
3. Benefits derived from the overlay zone cannot be reasonably
achieved through existing development standards or processing
requirements.
4. Proposed plans do not offer certain redeeming features to compen-
sate for requested modifications.
II
4
• 0
Minutes - Planning Commission - August 4 , 1987
Devencenzi) to allow subdivision of six parcels contain ' g
6.81 acres into twelve lots containing approximately 2 ,000
square feet each. Subject site is located at 8519 E Dorado
Road.
Mr . De amp noted that a request for continuance to the August 18th
meeting ad been received earlier to day from the ap icant noting
that the pplicant' s representative was out of town Staff has no
problem wi h the continuance.
Chairman Bon noted that public testimony could a taken, however,
no action woul be taken until the August 18th eeting.
Patty Woods, 854 E1 Dorado, stated she liv next door to the
site and asked w the property would be raded. She noted that
there is a large mo nd of dirt next to he property and expressed
concern that at som point this dirt c ld shift causing the dirt
to go onto her proper
Mr . DeCamp stated the si a has been he subject of extensive grad-
ing over the past years w thout be fit of any permits. He noted
the area will have extensi a con itions imposed so no significant
offsite impacts will occur a a esult of this grading.
MOTION: Made by Commissioner pelan, seconded by Commissioner
Lopez-Balbontin, a d rried unanimously to continue the
le
hearing on Tentat ' e Tra t Map 12-87 to the meeting of
August 18, 1987 .
3. General Plan Ame merit 2G-87 :
Request initiat d by City of Atasc dero to revise the General
Plan' s Commun ' y Appearance and Sta ards Element by elimin-
ating refer ce to a formal architec ural review process and
by deleting ppendix D "Draft Ordinanc - Design Review Com-
mission. "
Mr. DeCamp g e the presentation on this matter
Commissio r Copelan referred to Attachment A of the Resolution
(Appeara e Review) and asked for clarification o the term "vis-
ually s nsitive" . Discussion ensued.
Chai an Bond complimented staff on a concise, well itten re-
por .
TION: Made by Commissioner Copelan, seconded by Commis ' oner
Lopez-Balbontin and carried unanimously to recomm d ap-
proval of General Plan Amendment 2G-87 as reference in
staff' s recommendation.
4. General Plan Amendment 2A-87 and Zone Change 4-87 :
Request initiated by Joseph and Mary Lindsey (Donald Funk) to
revise the existing General Plan land use designation from
•
Minutes - Planning Commission - August 4, 1987
High Density Single Family to Low Density Multiple Family,
and to revise the existing zoning from RSF-X to RMF-4 (PD7) to
allow for a 20 lot small lot division. Subject site is lo-
cated at 8500 E1 Dorado Road.
Joel Moses presented the staff report noting the previous reviews
and applications for the property and pointed out staff' s recom-
mendation for denial. Mr. Moses then responded to questions from
the Commission.
Don Funk, agent for the applicant, referenced the site plan and
opposed staff' s requirement for putting in a road between Cascada
and through to Santa Fe stating that if this road is put in, it
would result with more through-traffic than currently exists. He
said this could be avoided by leaving the extension of Cascada as
a private cul-de-sac (shown on site plan) which would only serve
the proposed residential neighborhood. He proceeded to elaborate
on the various benefits and merits which could be derived by this
proposal (i.e. , the saving of as many trees as possible, engine-
ered drainage plan) . He stated his willingness to work with the
City on this project but re-emphasized his objection to extend
Cascada which he felt is unfair (referenced Poe and Peterson pro-
jects in that area which would also benefit from this extension) .
He showed examples of alternate site plans which he could be in
agreement with.
Art Cunningham, 8495 El Dorado, stated he was also speaking on
behalf of Mr. and Mrs. Richichi , read and presented a petition to
the Commission from the neighborhood in opposition to this re-
quest. He gave a history on the previous applications which have
been previously considered for this site and noted that he was not
opposed to building but was opposed to the continuous changes in
density being requested. He expressed drainage and density con-
cerns, traffic and safety issues feeling that this project is too
dense for this neighborhood.
Peggy Bascom, 8890 Arcade, spoke in opposition to the project not-
ing that there is a definite water problem which runs through the
neighborhood. She expressed concerns with the drainage, traffic
and parking along Arcade Road. She noted she is not against de-
veloping the site, but 20 lots is too much density.
Janice Wilson, 8873 Arcade Road, stated she has lived at this ad-
dress for 14 years, and concurred with Mrs. Bascom' s concerns.
Marie Bennett, El Dorado resident, stated water drainage comes
directly through her property underneath her deck and noted this
will be a big problem if not handled properly. She expressed con-
cerns with parking and noise levels and stated opposition to the
increase in density.
Joann Hessick, 8585 El Dorado, asked how the water from the sub-
ject property will be channeled. Chairman Bond explained that
engineered drainage plans would be required if the project were to
be approved.
A
•
Minutes - Planning Commission - August 4 , 1987
Chuck Weiser, new homeowner in the area, feels that the density
should stay at the one-half acre.
Mr . Funk addressed concerns which were brought up by the previous
speakers. There was discussion concerning average lot sizes in
the neighborhood in which it was pointed out that most lots along
Arcade Road average around 8, 000 square feet.
Commissioner Lopez-Balbontin asked what criteria would be used in
requiring extension of Cascada to Santa Fe. Mr. Moses elaborated
on studies and on-going problems occurring in the area concerning
traffic circulation, traffic signals in strategic areas, etc.
elaborated on proposed traffic signals. There was further discus-
sion on looking at this neighborhood area as a whole with regard
to such traffic circulation issues.
Commissioner Copelan expressed concern with other projects in the
area and would be in favor of continuing the matter in order to
have the Public Works Director present to answer questions. Mr.
Engen added that Mr. Sensibaugh would be able to attend the August
18th meeting.
There was further discussion among the Commission concerning traf-
fic circulation problems. Commissioner Michielssen noted he
would be interested in hearing what the Traffic Committee has to
say about this area. He felt it would be beneficial for a member
of the Planning Commission to serve on the Traffic Committee, es-
pecially for matters such as this where the Commission could be
appropriately apprised. Chairman Bond concurred.
Commissioner Kidwell expressed concern with the increase in den-
sity and noted she would vote for denial of the request as pre-
sented.
MOTION: Made by Commissioner Lopez-Balbontin and seconded by
Commissioner Copelan to continue the hearing on General
Plan Amendment 2A-87 and Zone Change 6-87 until the Au-
gust 18th meeting so that the Public Works Director may
be present to answer questions. The motion carried with
a 4 : 2 roll call vote:
AYES : Commissioners Lopez-Balbontin, Copelan, Nolan, and
Michielssen
NOES : Commissioner Kidwell and Chairman Bond
Chairman called a recess at 9 : 10 .m; meeting reconvened at
9 : 23 p.m.
5. General Plan Amendment -
Request initiated b City of ascadero/Atascadero Unified
School Districtto revise the Pu and Quasi-Public Ser-
vices Element the General Plan to des to a site for a
future school. The request also includes an xtension of the
r,
Minutes - Planning Commission - August 18, 198•
2. General Plan Amendment 2A-87 and Zone Change 4-87 :
Request initiated by Joseph and Mary Lindsey (Donald Funk) to
revise the existing General Plan land use designation from
High Density Single Family to Low Density Multiple Family,
and to revise the existing zoning from RSF-X to RMF-4 (PD7) to
allow for a 20 lot small lot subdivision. Subject site is
located at 8500 E1 Dorado Road. (CONTINUED FROM COMMISSION
MEETING OF AUGUST 4, 1987)
Mr . Moses presented the background on this subject explaining
staff' s recommendation for denial of the request.
With regard to the proposed street for this project, Mr.
Sensibaugh commented on studies that were done on the circulation
patterns in this area with the conclusion being that the street
may not be necessary as long as the other existing streets (Casca-
da and E1 Dorado) can be extended through (as part of future dev-
elopments in the area) . Mr . Sensibaugh added that when the condi-
tioning portion of the project is considered, the applicant should
be aware that there will be additional requirements above and be-
yond the normal conditioning. He then responded to questions from
the Commission.
In response to question from Commissioner Nolan, Mr . Moses stated
that staff' s major concern had been the specific site design pro-
posed, but with Public Works proposed elimination of the through
street, staff' s recommendation would probably be for approval.
In response to question from Commissioner Lopez-Balbontin, Mr.
Moses explained what the "modifications of development standards"
would be for this project.
It was pointed out that staff ' s recommendation would now be for
approval for the general plan amendment and zone change request,
but would need direction by the Commission to staff to prepare
the appropriate findings, resolution, etc. for consideration.
Don Funk, agent for the applicant, spoke in support of the request
and explained the intent of the project design. He noted he had
met with staff and a couple of neighbors concerning the circula-
tion flows in the neighborhood with the general consensus being
that perhaps the proposed road going through to E1 Centro would
not be necessary.
Mr. Funk added that the applicant is willing to pay an equitable
fair share of improvements for the project, but would not like to
see an open-ended situation concerning fees as the end result
could be that the project is economically unfeasible. He ad-
dressed some of the particulars associated with the project (i.e. ,
the cul-de-sac, circulation through the project) .
Art Cunningham, 8495 E1 Dorado, stated that within the past three
years, density increases in the neighborhood have resulted in a
250% increase (or 106 units) and added that this density increase
is what the neighbors are really opposed to. He spoke about the
3
Minutes - Planning Commission - August 18, 198
drainage problem in the area, and stated that he was speaking for
the neighborhood residents in opposition to the proposed increase
in density.
Barbara Reiter, 10150 San Marcos, felt the application represented
"spot" zoning. She felt the property would be better suited for
development of 20 ,000 square foot lots. ,
Chairman Bond stated he would be comfortable with 20, 000 square
foot lots as he did not think the smaller lots would be feasible
in this area.
Commissioner Kidwell stated she would not be comfortable with
approving the requested revision just nine months after another
general plan amendment and zone change had been approved for the
creation of 20, 000 square foot lots.
Mr. Moses clarified for the Commission the applicant' s intent for
wanting to rezone only a portion of the property for the PD over-
lay. Discussion ensued concerning density standards.
In response to question from Mr. Funk, Mr. Moses explained the
recent revision to the Zoning Ordinance concerning densities in
multi-family zones which involves determining the density on a
sliding basis of per acre based on a factor of the slope and the
number of bedrooms proposed for a project. Discussion ensued.
MOTION: Made by Commissioner Kidwell and seconded by Chairman
Bond to recommend denial of General Plan Amendment 2A-87
and Zone Change 4-87. The motion carried 4 : 2 with a roll
call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Kidwell, Michielssen, Copelan, and
Chairman Bond
NOES : Commissioners Nolan and Lopez-Balbontin
Commissioner Copelan commented that she felt this request involves
too much density but likes the concept of the development.
Commissioner Lopez-Balbontin stated that he voted against denial
as he would like to see conditions for consideration of the
project.
hairman Bond called a recess at 9 : 05 p.m. ; meeting reconvened at
9 :
3. General Plan A e dment 2C-87 and Zone Change 6-87 :
Request initiated by L.I7._-McCaslin/Richard Hawkins to revise
the existing General Plan land--=use map designation from Low
Density Single Family to High Dens 'fy- -Multiple Family and
coinciding zone change to revise the exist-i-ng RSF-Z zoning _
to RMF/16 (PD7) . Subject site is located at 9300---E1� Bordo
Road.
(CONTINUED FROM COMMISSION MEETING OF JULY 21, 1 $ ,_
4
PETITION .
1 August 1987
We, the residents of the area affected by the General Plan
Amendment requested by Joseph Lindsay at 8500 E1 Doi-ado , City
of Atascadero , are opposed to such General Plan amendment.
Changes of this type tend to destroy the character and quality
of life within the neighborhood. We feel the Planning; Commission
and City Council 's first allegiance should be to the current `
residents of a neighborhood rather than developers seeking to
maximize profits from such changes in the General Plan.
NAME ADDRESS
1. y y c c
2 .
3.
4
r2�
5.
6. �� � ,✓ �' �a' S :4,t
7.
8.
9.
_ TT
LZ
12 � �� p G F
1 1^,t�L� 11� 5-GrJ
14.
15 .
f PETITION
1 August 1987 ;
We, the residents of the area affected by the General Plan
-a
Amendment requested by Joseph Lindsay at 8500 El Dorado , City
of Atascadero , are opposed to such General Plan amendment."
Changes of this type tend to destroy the character and quality
of life within the neighborhood. We feel the Planning Commission
and City Council 's first allegiance should be to the current
residents of a neighborhood rather than developers seeking to
maximize profits from such changes in the General Plan.
NAME ADDRESS nn
1._�Q1i a�5.o� A�'�ri g�90 ttr�aa�
2 . r
3. Lj CLU 4
4 '6-1
6.—--k-;-/� 1q)eC-qd'-
7• S 915
8. � 1Z
9
Y
ry 12 W.(.a.C� ,.- g Z
13.
14•
15. % j_ CC, C�,
PETITION
1 August 1987
We, the residents of the area affected by the General Plan
Amendment requested by Joseph Lindsay at 8500 El Dorado , City
of Atascadero , are opposed to such General Plan amendment.'
Changes of this type tend to destroy the character and quality t
of life within the neighborhood. We feel the Planning Commission c
and City Council 's first allegiance should be to the current
residents of a neighborhood rather than developers seeking to b
maximize profits from such changes in the General Plan. '
NAME
ADDRESS
2 o
3. fF 3
4. 4
` F
5• y.
• YJ.,
7. Bac
9. 6580 b .
10
12• 4"7
13r
14.
15.
r?ETITIO i
1 August 1987 -%
We , the residents of the area affected by the General Plan
Amendment requested by Joseph Lindsay at 8500 E1 Lorado , City
of Atascadero , are opposed to such General Plan amendment.
Changes of this type tend to destroy the character and quality
of life within the neighborhood. We feel the Planning Commission
and City Council ' s first allegiance should be to the current
residents of a neighborhood rather than developers seeking to
maximize profits from/such changes in the General Plan.
IdAME ice, Yy
ADDIIESS
2 • (A LAR.7v W E%-L-5 X05 LYN —
af r e� OS in
4
10. i !G�rN
• 11. ._
12 .
13 .
14.
15 .
PETITION
1 August 1987 + .
We, the residents of the area affected by the General Plan
)1
Amendment requested by Joseph Lindsay at 8500 E1 Dorado , City r
;t
of Atascadero , are opposed to such General Plan amendment.
Changes of this type tend to destroy the character and quality
of life within the neighborhood. We feel the Planning Commission x
and City Council 's first allegiance should be to the current
residents of a neighborhood rather than developers seeking to
maximize profits from such changes in the General Plan.
nzx a,,,�tr
NA
TuiE ADDRESS r:
3
5 :4
6
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
je.
12. s
13.
14.
15.
TO: Atascadero Uity Council
FROM: Arthur E. Cunningham
Due to arevious commitment 1 am unable to attend the6e t.
P P
229 19137 meeting of the Uity Council. This letter is for the
purpose of registering my opposition to the adoption of General
Flan Amendment 2A87 , Zone change 4-87 , kLindsey-r'unk) at 8500 E1
Dorado Kd.
My reasons are:
1. The site was changed in Feb. 1987 under General Plan Amendment
GP: 1C-87, Lone Change LC: 27-86 from KSF-Y ( 1 acre) to RSF-X
(j acre .
2 . This is the third time since 1981 this type of density has been
applied for and each time the neighborhood residents have been
opposed.
3 . in 1984 there were 24 potential homesites in the area.
1986 72 moresites approved.
1967 23 more applied for.
This is a 200% plus increase in density.
4 . All the reasons for opposition in the past are stiil valid.
a. Noise level will increase.
b. Schools still impacted.
c . Streets are the same only older.
d . Drainage is amajor problem.
e . Traffic will increase .
f. In my opinion this constitutes spot zoning.
For myself and the residents of the area we are not opposed
to building on the site but at the present zoning not the
proposed zoning by the applicant.
RECEIVES Respectfully,
� P 1 4 1987
Arthur E. Cunningham
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: City Council September 22, 1987
VIA: Michael Shelton, City Manager.'
FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director4 ,
SUBJECT: Potential New 20, 000 Square Foot Lots
BACKGROUND:
At the City Council' s September 8, 1987 meeting, staff was directed to
prepare a report on the potential number of new 20, 000 square foot
lots with particular focus on flag lot concentrations.
ANALYSIS:
The accompanying map identifies the major areas within the City which
can accommodate additional 20 , 000 square foot lots. These are the RSF
• and LSF-X districts which permit 20,000 square foot parcels where
sewer is available.
Within the shaded areas on the attached maps, approximately 128 new
20 , 000 square foot lots could be developed, of which approximately 46
could be in the form of standard planned subdivisions (36% of the to-
tal) . Of the remaining 82 potential lots, it would appear that ap-
proximately 66 would be flag lots.
FLAG LOT CRITERIA:
There has been considerable discussion by both the Planning Commission
and City Council relative to concerns over development of flag lots,
especially in the LSF and RSF districts. I would suggest that flag
lot standards be a subject of discussion at the joint meeting of the
City Council and Planning Commission on September 24th. This may take
the form of outlining concerns to give staff direction for coming up
with standards to be incorporated into the new subdivision ordinance.
Included could be minimum frontage on public streets, number of lots
that should trigger a requirement for a public street (or construction
to public street standards) , length of "flag" , requirement for ade-
quate street addressing for emergency vehicles, discouragement of cre-
ation of flags which will require excessive grading, concern over in-
troduction of flag lots in neighborhoods generally not chacterized by
• same (e.g. Sombrilla Avenue) .
RECOMMENDATION:
Refer this report to the agenda for the joint City Council/Planning
Commission special meeting on September 24th.
HE:ph
Enclosure: Primary 20 ,000 Square Foot Lot Areas Map
•
��-may � •� �► .. �. � _
`� - `` = ►- 111
•
NEW CNN
24111
Minn
1,0
PAP
no
X11: /// • ♦� , �� I��
� :��►••A�►. , �� , /r.
►�. �. PON
I ® ;
������ ►I • ��
Ad
pm PEP
Om
OR
INMAO
am-
- \SII
• � .�� '` moi► �
�I � � � rte • • �
� ' i , LI SM
MEMORANDUM
• September 22 , 1987
To : City Council
t
Via: Mike Shelton , City Manager ` ' ,
From: Bob Best , Parks and Recreation Director-79--
Subject : Utility Vehicle Bid Award
BACKGROUND
As part of the FY 1987-88 Budget , Council approved the purchase of a
utility vehicle for the Parks Division. The vehicle need is now critical
with the continued development of Paloma Park and the construction of
Traffic Way Multi-Purpose Fields set to begin soon.
BID RESULTS
Two bids were received:
Sam Ferrante - Snider Hi Jet $81218 . 18
• Sacramento , CA
Cal Coast Machinery $8 , 551 . 02
Santa Maria, CA
RECOMMENDATION
Award the bid for the purchase of the Parks Utility Vehicle to Sam
Ferrante - Snider Hi Jet for $8 , 218 . 18 .
FISCAL IMPACT
The bid price is under budget, as Council approved $9 ,800 for the
purchase of the Utility Vehicle .
•
MEMORANDUM
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
Through: Michael Shelton, City Manager 41 -
From:
Paul M. Sensibaugh, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Subject : Award of Bid for the Reconstruction of Santa Ysabel
Date: September 15, 1987
Recommendation:
Staff recommends that Council determine that the apparent low bid
• of $129, 167. 10 is the lowest responsible bid and award said bid to
M.J. Hermrick, Inc . of Atascadero.
Backround:
A total of five (5) bids were received on September 11 for the
above project, ranging from the low bid to $180, 625 .59 with the
working days ranging form 28 days to 40 days . The low bidder will
complete the project within 35 working days .
Attached is a bid summary prepared by North Coast Engineering,
the consultants for the above project . The ranges bid for the
individual items should be noted since they reflect the difficulty
envolved in estimating a project . The fewer the items, the more
difficult the task; the greater the quantity, the easier a small
change in unit cost will affect the extension.
Start of Construction:
Construction could start as soon as bonding is presented, but the
actual realistic start time will be determined at the pre
construction conference on September 24. If construction starts
before October 1 , Santa Ysabel will be torn up during the Colony Days
parade which is held on October 17 this year. Santa Ysabel is a
Portion of the return route for the parade and is used mostly by
vehicles and floats, although many pedestrians also traverse the
Woute.
0
If the project is delayed until after the paras tst ccs of •
rain increases and the 10 to 15 days lost time could rmtmttalizl7 leave
the project unfinished until February. On the othaw, (ff- if t3�zs
winter is like the last the delay would be less meanin w1l.,
An alternate route has been designated using I",e°s , Sbwlwiilla
and Pueblo streets as shown on the attached map . Roby Scm2m-iilla
have been recently paved and only represent an offset aff, anw, ADJ-ack for
only a small portion of the return route . The a1ternritw aLutg-- its safe
but longer and is not favored by the parade committee .
Fiscal Impact :
The low bid for Phase C is $129, 167 and the Ermf4 . er"z estimate
was $1.11 , 588. The budget amount is $120, 000 . There ii-% &Rumrmv1imte.Jy
$112,000 remaining in the windfall SB 300 funds whic't muff1, Iii; w-set on
this type of project . Approximately $15, 100 will ht reiunu m
two developments previously conditioned for paveoud iziming
$2,067 could come from a combination of gas tax 3-ud et l„ q.om tax,
carryover and/or gas tax interest, of which the latttrar, tits
will not be known until the fiscal audit is completeL, M-tmt, Ri6kely,
however, the $2, 067 will not be needed since there i j `1'Q,,+ i ) :Em, ttlhe
above bid for utility service relocations that maTy' or- matt. =tr be
necessary. If no services are encountered, and if r : cha 's (Deters
are necessary, there could be as much as $8, 000 of "-maninflnw, S-•3BO
funds for use for a portion of Phase B drainage .
•
NORTH COAST ENGINEERIN"
BID SUMMARY ---BID OPEW/i'[/87
SANTA YSABEL RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
CITY OF ATASCADERO
-----------------------------------------------
010 ITEM d DESCRIPTION ENGINEER'S :MIKE FREDERICK CORP :MADONNA CONST. CO. M.J. HERMRICK,INC R. BURKE CORP. :BRANCH EARTH MOVIHG,1
ESTIMATE
---------------------------------------
-------------- - --'------------
UNIT ! UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT ! UNIT
Z�! ::NO. ITEM UNIT DUAN.: PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT f PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT ; PRICE AMM
1 MOBILIZATION LS 1 5000.00 5000.00 ; 6300.00 6300.00 115000.00 15000.00 8000.00 8000.00 12000.00 12000.00 !12200.00 12200.00
1:1-1 CLEARING d LS 1 : 2000.00 2000.00 ! 31706.00 31706.00 : 5000.00 5000.00 10000.00 10000.00 6200.00 6200.00 !15600.00 15600.00
GRUBBING
-----'----;------- ------
ROADWAY -
111-2 EICAVATIONLS 1 : 10530.00 10530.00 1 6700.00 6700.00 ! 22510.80 22510.80 16000.00 16000.00 20000.00 20000.00 124219.00 24219.00
(2340 CY)
111-3 ASPHALT TON 1450 1 33.00 47850.00; 36.21 52499.86 : 31.57 45776.50 30.00 43500.00 31.75 46037.50 1 30.00 43500.00
CONCRETE
1:1-4 CLASS 2 CY 1520 : 20.00 30400.00 ! 16.46 25014.94 : 16.00 24320.00 13.00 19760.00 18.50 28120.00:-15.95 24244.00
AGGREGATE BASE
1!1-5 FOG SEAL SY 3870 S 0.33 1277.10 t 0.54 2099.86 ; 0.45 1741.50 0.33 1217.10 0.30 1161.40 : 0.45 1741.50
101-6 CONCRETE LF 563 : 8.50 4785.50 1 52.83 29744.98 : 10.00 5630.00 15.00 8445.00 14.50 8143.50 1-15.95 6979.85
CURS d GUTTER
111-7 HANDICAP RAMP EA 3 ! 1000.00 3000.00 : 4126.66 12379.98 : 500.00 1500.00 1500.00 4500.00 350.00 1050.00: 1236.00 3708.00
• :; CURB i SIDEWALK ; ----
:!1-8 MANHOLE EA 4 : 250.00 1000.00 1 262.50 1050.00 : 250.00 1000.00 350.00
GRADE ADJUSTMENT 1400.00 175.00 100.00 1 300.00 1200.00
..1-9 VALDE d NONEA 4 : 150,00 600.00 ! 157.50 630.00
GRADE ADJUSTMENT ; 150.00 600.00 300.00 1200.00 160.00 640.00 : 300.00 1200.00
:11-10 6'AC BERM LF 65 : 3.00 195.00 1 10.00 650.00 : 5.00 315.00 5.00 325.00 14.00 910.00 ! 5,00 - u5,00
1
1:1-11 TRAFFIC EA 4 1 75.00 300.00 ! 52.50 210.00 ; 50.00 200.00 65.00
DELINEATORS 260.00 30.00 120.00 : 100.00 - 400.00
,
::1-12 CONCRETE EA 6 1 15D.00 900.00 1 766.66 4599.96 : 700.00 4200.00 250.00 1500.00 350.00 2100.00 : 403.20 -2419.20
DRIVEWAY
;:1-13 CONCRETE CROSS EA 1 1 2000.00 2000.00 ! 3760.00 3760.00 ! 1500.00 1500.00 3000.00 3000.00 5350.00 5350.00 : 2998.00 2998.00
GUTTER
..1-14 RELOCATE SEWER EA 5 : 200.00 1000.00 : 210.00 1050.00 1 500.00 2500.00 1000.00 5000.00 250.00
LATERAL 1250.00 : 660.00 3300.00
,
� 1 ,
::1-15 RELOCATE WATER EA 5 ! 150.00 750.00 ! 446.00 2230.00 : 500.00 2500.00 1000.00 5000.00 250.00 1250.00 ! 400.00 2000.00
SERVICE
TOTAL BIO 1111,581.60 1180,625.59 0134,303.60 1129,167.10 0135,052.00 $148,034.55
WORK/NG DaYS 40 �B 35 i 35 40
S � •
W-4
111 ■ 4rj. � 11�
CAM, 4i
lb
o9 400f
WE
-o •.�`m
� IM Mp
IWIR
� -��� . �= •sir .� .
Ilk
��► •. ME
•
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Council
THROUGH: Mike Shelton , City Manauer
c
FROM: Paul Sensibaugh , Director of Public Works
SUBJECT : Road Acceptance Resolution
DATE September 14 , 1957
Recommendation :
s
Staff recommends that Council approve the attached
Resolution accepting newly constructed portion of Graves
Creek Road into the city-maintained road system.
Background:
The road section referred to here was constructed in
1983 by the Gordon T . Davis Cattle Co . , in accordance with
• plans approved by the City Engineer . All required
inspections have been comvleted and the roads have -been
determined to have been constructed as to the plans .
Fiscal Impact :
By accepting this road into the city-maintained system
the city will become responsible for the repair , however,
no significant work is expected for several
years .
•
RESOLUTION NO. 101 -87 •
RESOLUTION OF Ti-1E COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ATASCADERO ACCEPTING A PORTION OF
GRAVES CREEK ROAD INTO THE CITY STREET SYSTEM
The Council of the City of Atascadero resolves as
follows
1 . Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1806 of the
California Streets and Highways Code , the following street
is are hereby accepted into the city street system:
Street Name Lencg. th_in Feet Miles
Graves Creek 2 , 112+- .4
(From Santa Ana to San Fernando)
2 . A copy of this resolution shall be furnished to :
Gordon T . Davis Cattle Co .
On motion by Council Member , and
seconded by Council Member the
Atascadero City Council hereby adopts the foregoing •
resolution in its entirety on the following roll call vote :
AYES;
NOES :
ABSENT :
ADOPTED:
ATTEST :
---------------------------- -------------------------
BOYD C . SHARITZ BARBARA NORRIS , Mayor
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT :
--------------------------- --------------------------
JEFFREY G. JORGENSEN PAUL M. SENSIBAUGH
City Attorney Director of Public Works •
♦Y �'1
11
f
a _
14.
rte_
op cr-
�J
Z44 t!
f '
1
1 11
II
�t �1
tt � ►
tt
t
V
r�
$ " LL
J
t
I
- � �C00 ic
oa
r „ WZ Z c
W a z
t 1 11 U) V z c
\ If V
i N 1WL
N Ff-
a Q �
u
/
11
to
//
06.
AlQ �
i
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: 9/15/87
TO: City Council
THROUGH: Michael Shelton, City Manager
FROM: Mike McCain, Acting Fire Chief
SUBJECT: Proposed Resolution No . 95-87 - Appropriation of Arson
Reward
RECOMMENDATION
It is requested that the City Council appropriate $5 , 000 from
Council Contingency Funds to be used to pay for a reward for
information which leads to the arrest andconviction of the
individuals involved in the wildland arson fires within the
Atascadero City limits during the 1987 fire season.
•
DISCUSSION
Since 1983 , there have been over 250 arson fires in the North
County area. A large number of these fires have been in the City
of Atascadero and have created a great financial burden on the
taxpayers .
In this same period, two people were arrested and convicted for
some of the fires and are now serving prison terms . After the
arrest , the 1986 fire season was not as severe , although there
was still occasional arson activity. This summer we didn' t
anticipate arson activity to be as large a problem as the
previous year . During the first part of the summer this proved
to be true , however, activity has picked up at an alarming rate
with arson fires for this season totaling 11 in this City alone.
For this reason, now it is more important than ever that we
request money from the City to assist not only our Department,
but the many departments in the County who are trying to put a
stop to the arson activity. The reward money would be combined
with money that other organizations have made available .
It is my recommendation the reward money be made available for
information leading to the arrest and conviction of individuals
responsible for wildland arson fires within the Atascadero City
limits during the 1987 fire season only. /
j
9
Arson reward memo
9/15/87
Page 2
FISCAL IMPACT
Reduce Council contingency funds by $5 , 000 , if appropriated and
awarded.
MIKE McCAIN
MM:pg
i
RESOLUTION 95-87
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO
APPROPRIATING $5 , 000 FROM COUNCIL CONTINGENCY FUNDS
TO BE USED AS AN ARSON INFORMATION REWARD
WHEREAS , the City Council has been requested to appropriate
reward money in the amount of $5 , 000 for information leading to
the arrest and conviction of those individuals responsible for
wildland arson fires during the 1987 fire season in the City of
Atascadero ; and
WHEREAS , it is felt a reward provides an additional
incentive to individuals to contribute information which may
result in the conviction of arsonists ;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Atascadero City
Council appropriate $5 , 000 from Council Contingency Funds to be
used as an arson information reward.
On motion by Councilperson and seconded
. by Councilperson , the foregoing resolution is
hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call votes :
AYES :
NOES :
ABSENT:
ADOPTED:
CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA
By:
BARBARA NORRIS , Mayor
ATTEST:
BOYD C. SHARITZ, City Clerk
PREPARED BY:
MICHAEL MCCAIN, Acting Fire Chief
r
(Resolution No . 95-87 , continued)
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
r
l
K -
MICHAEL SHELTON, City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
JEFFREY G. JORGENSEN, City Attorney
i
MEMORANDUM
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
Through: Michael Shelton, City Manager �AIII
From: Paul M. Sensibaugh, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Subject : Disadvantaged Business Enterprises Policy
Date : September 15, 1987
Recommendation:
Staff recommends that Council adopt the attached resolution
•establishing a Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBE) Policy and
Liaison Officer.
Backround:
The newly enacted "Surface Transportation and Uniform Relocation
Assistance Act of 1987" revised the DBE requirements for contracts and
subcontracts for projects receiving Federal-Aid funds . Such projects
are the four bridges replacement projects, FAU and FAS road-related
Projects, Revenue Sharing projects, and transit fund projects .
More specifically, Section 106 (c) of the "Federal-Aid Highway Act
of 1987" requires that an annual goal of not less than 10% be
established for the participation of small business concerns owned and
controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals .
Additionally women shall be included into this category and a seperate
goal for Women Business Enterprises (WBE) is no longer acceptable .
Discussion:
The Monterey Road-Graves Creek Bridge is nearing approval to bid
from Caltrans and since the Highway Act is now in effect, the City
must (1) establish a Policy Statement by council action, (2) designate
a DBE Liaison Officer, (3) establish an annual goal , (4) establish
individual project goals, (5) give public notification of annual goal
n an annual basis and (6) administer the DBE policy.
0 •
The annual goal is the aggregate of the individual contract
project goals that are expected during the federal fiscal year. By
establishing the annual goal now the project goals can be set
individually with a single goal less than or greater than the annual
goal . A project goal is based on the size (cost) type of work
( ) and YP
availability of DBE participation, and past achievement . Title 49CFR
requires that a waiver must be requested and approved for an annual
goal of less than 10%.
Fiscal Impact :
The fiscal impact of the required policy is unknown at this time
and may never be fully determined. The abstract factors such as
availability of DBE' s, inefficiencies due to subletting just to meet
the requirements, inexperience and unforseen actual administrative
time could be costly. On the other hand the value of the grant itself
Will outweigh the negatives . The accumulation of requirements,
however, sometimes does not outweigh the negatives especially on
smaller projects .
•
•
RESOLUTION No. 99-87
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO ESTABLISHING A
POLICY STATEMENT FOR DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISES
(DBE) AND ESTABLISHMENT OF A DBE LIAISON OFFICER IN
ACCORDANCE WITH CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS 49,
PART 23, SECTION 23.45 AND OTHER RELATED SECTIONS
WHEREAS, CFR 49 23 requires the establishment of a Policy
Statement and a Liaison Officer with respect to Disadvantaged Business
Enterprises; and
WHEREAS, certain certain City projects receive Federal-Aid funds;
and
WHEREAS, the City recognizes the hardships of small business
concerns owned and controlled by socially and economically
disadvantaged individuals; and
WHEREAS, the minimum acceptable goal for contracts is 10% DBE.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Council of the City of
Atascadero does hereby establish the policy to utilize Disadvantaged
Business Enterprises (DBE) in all aspects of contracting to the
maximum extent feasible . This policy is fully described herein on
Exhibit A which constitutes policy and commitment to substantially
increase Disadvantaged Business Utilization. This policy includes any
Program activity funded wholly or in part by any U.S. Department of
Transportation modal element .
This City, its contractors and subcontractors, which are the
recipients of Federal-Aid funds, agree to ensure that DBE firms have
the maximum opportunity to participate in the performance of contracts
and subcontracts . In this regard, this City and all of its
contractors and subcontractors will take all reasonable steps in
accordance with 49 CFR 23 to ensure that DBE firms have the maximum
opportunity to compete for and perform contracts .
0 0
On motion of Councilperson and seconded by
Councilperson the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted
in its entirety on the following vote :
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
DATE:
ATTEST: City of Atascadero
BOYD C. SHARITZ, City Clerk BARBARA NORRIS, Mayor
By:
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
JEFFREY G . JORGENSEN PAUL M. SENSIBAUGH
City Attorney Director of Public Works/
City Engineer
• 0
. II . Disadvantaged Business_Enter priseCDBEZ_ Liaisot7_Officer
is the DBE Liaison Officer for this agency and shall report
to the He/She will be assigned
such staff as is necessary to fully implement the provisions
of 49CFR Part 23 and such other DBE programs as may be
required. The reporting structure and duties of support
staff are shown on Attachment
III . Duties_of DEE_Liaison_Officer
The DBE Liaison Officer shall develop, manage and
implement the DBE Program on a day-to-day basis . The Liaison
Officer shall :
- Develop and carry out technical assistance programs
for DBE' s .
- Arrange solicitations , time for the presentation of
bids , quantities , specifications , and delivery
schedules so as to facilitate the participation of
DBE' s . Where such changes are found necessary to
increase DBE utilization , they will be made in con-
sultation and cooperation with the functional unit
• involved .
- Provide guidance to DBE' s in overcoming barriers ,
such as inability to obtain bonding or financing.
- Carry out information and communication programs on
contracting opportunities in a timely manner .
Programs shall be bilingual where appropriate .
- Investigate the services offered by banks owned and
controlled by Disadvantaged Business Enterprises .
- Unless noted elsewhere herein the listing of DBE' s
certified by Caltrans will be utilized. Said listing
is to be made available to all project bidders . Such
listing will include the following information : Name,
address , phone number , ethnic and/or sexual ownership,
type of work performed by firm.
- Prior to approval of the substitution of any DBE sub-
contractor , the prime contractor will be required to
prove performance of good faith efforts to replace the
DBE with another eligible DBE.
- Establish overall goals for disadvantaged business
enterprises . Goals shall be evaluated annually and
adjusted as necessary .
- Establish appropriate individual project goals for
disadvantaged business enterprises . All projects
will be evaluated for the appropriatness of goals .
• •
- Perform good faith analysis when project goals are
not achieved.
- Maintain such documentation as is necessary to verify
performance of all activities included in this
program.
IV . Public_Notification
1 . At the time of the submittal of this program to the
State Deaprtment of Transportation , a notice in both minority
and majority local media will be published. Said publication
shall include:
- The annual overall DBE goals .
- Inform the public that the goals and a description of
how they are set are available for public inspection
for a period of 30 days .
- Inform the public that both U. S . DOT and this agency
will accept comments on the goals for 45 days from
the date of the notice .
- The notice shall advise interested parties that
comments are for information purposes only .
2 . This program will be reaffirmed by public notice
annually at the time of publication of overall goals . If
substantial changes are made to this document , the entire
document shall be subject to notification noted in (1) above .
3 . In addition to the foregoing, interested
disadvantaged and majority contractor organizations will
receive direct mailings of this complete program.
V . Establishment of Goals
1 . DEE goals will be established both annually (overall)
and on a per contract basis . The overall goal will be based
on planned contract activity for the coming year . The
overall goal established will be subject to methodology and
procedures established in 49CFR 23, Subparts (C) and (D) and
take effect on October 1st of each year .
2 . The overall goals established with this initial
program is 10% DBE; and covers the period of October 1 , 1987
to September 30, 1988 .
3 . Individual project goals will be established for DBE
activity based on the following criteria :
- Attainment of established overall cxoals .
- Size of project .
•
• - Opportunities for DBE' s as subcontractors , vendors ,
and suppliers .
- Minority population of geographic area in which work
is to be performed.
- DBE goals being utilized in the geographic area by
other State, Federal or local jurisdictions .
Availability of DBE' s .
- Past experience on projects similar to the project
being evaluated.
- Such other factors as may effect the utilization of
DBE.
- Complete evluation documentation will be retained
for each project .
4 . Projects which do not contain specific goals will
contain the following provisions :
A. "Policy . It is the policy of the City of Atascadero
that disadvantaged business enterprises as defined in 49 CFR
Part 23 shall have the maximum opportunity to participate in
the performance of contracts financed in whole or in part
with Federal funds under this agreement . Consequently , the
DBE requirements of 49 CFR Part 23 apply to this agreement . "
B. "DBE Obligation . (i) The recipient or its contractor
agrees to ensure that disadvantaged business enterprises as
defined in 49 CFR 23 have the maximum opportunity to
participate in the performance of contracts and subcontracts
financed in whole or in part with Federal funds provided
under this agreement . In this regard, all recipients or
contractors shall take all necessary and reasonable steps in
accordance with 49 CFR Part 23 to ensure that disadvantaged
business enterprises have the maximum opportunity to compete
for and perform contracts . Recipients and their contractors
shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national
origin , or sex in the award and performance of DOT-assisted
contracts . ''
VI . Contract Procedure
This program shall be implemented through the
utilization of a contract special provision which will be
provided/updated as necessary by Caltrans' Division of Local
Streets and Roads . These procedures require bidders to
submit the names of DBE subcontractors and suppliers , a
description of the work each is to perform or material to be
furnished, and the dollar value of each DBE subactivity .
• •
VII . DBE Notification
Projects will be advertised in local newspapers and
minority focus newspapers when possible . These ads will
include reference to DBE requirements and will indicate DBE
project goals .
DBE assistance centers will receive notification of
projects scheduled to be advertised. Assistance Centers ,
Minority Business Development Centers and Program Management
Centers will be afforded the opportunity to receive
complimentary plans and specifications for projects within
their geographical area of responsibility .
VIII . Selection Criteria for Projects with DBE Goals
Every project containing DBE goals shall be evaluated by
the DBE Liaison Officer or his/her designee to ascertain
bidding contractors' efforts to attain the DBE goals . The
award of any project with DBE goals must be concurred with by
the DBE Liaison Officer or his/her designee before said
contract may be awarded. Should there be disagreement
between functional units concerning contractors' efforts to
attain contract goals for DBE participation, the matter shall
be referred to or his/her designee for •
final determination .
Competitors that fail to meet the DBE goals and fail to
demonstrate sufficient reasonable good faith efforts shall
not be eligible to be awarded the contract .
Any contracts that contain DBE goals , pursuant to this
Policy , will be monitored on an ongoing basis by project
personnel during the course of construction . The DBE Liaison
Officer is to be immediately advised of any circumstances
wherein contractor compliance with thee DBE provision is
questionable . The contractor shall submit a final report for
each project with DBE goals which includes total payments to
the prime contractor as well as payments the prime contractor
has made to DBE subcontractors , vendors and suppliers . If
the report indicates the -prime contractor has not achieved
the project goals , project personnel shall attach an
evaluation , in narrative form, of the reasons for failure to
attain the goals and any corrective action that was taken .
Prime contractors will be required to notify the Agency
of any situation in which regularly scheduled progress
payments are not made to DBE subcontractors , vendors or
suppliers .
IX . Set-Asides
If determined necessary by the DBE Liaison Officer, DBE
Set-Asides will be considered a tool to achieve annual
overall goals .
1�c�1H2c��
DESCRZPT.0"l ESTr:L1TED
TYPE OF WORK MANGE r ;�:�:
CON-.PACT PZOJ%CT GOALS
i, COST DBE I
%
TRAFFIC SIGNALS Cont-rollor replacement CNLY
000 0
S100 j
leas than g to 8'
W 550,000 10 to 12'
TRAFFIC SIGNALS / Hardware and loops more than
less than 8 to 10
TRAFFIC SIGNALS w/ Any roadwork(islands-access ramp) $100,000
10 to 12
more STREET LIGHTING w/ 230 OTHER WORK
' S20,000+ 5 to 8 .
LANDSCAPING W/ No OTNER WORK
S20,000+ 5 to 8
PAVEMENT HARKING w/ No OTHER WORK
520,000+ 5 to 8
less than 8 to 10
ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION w/ Pavement resurfacing only, no S150,000
fabric, dig-outs or striping more than i0 to 12
less than 10 to 12
ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION '/Pavement resurfacing only, with $150,000
fabric, dig-outs and striping more than 11 to 13
i
less than 10 to 12
^'1ADwF+Y CONSTRUCTION w/Drainage items $200,000 12 to 14
more than
less than 10 to 12
ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION w/Curbs, gutters, sidewalk and $100,000 12 to 14,
access r=ps more than
less than 12 to 141
ROADWAY CO27STRUCTZON w/Pavement resurfacing and one of 5300,000 13 to 151
above items more than i
less than 13 to I5�
ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION w/Pavement resurfacing and two or mo=e� 14 to 16'
more of the above items i
less than 12 to 14
ROADWAY CCNSTRUCTION w/Pavement reconstruction ONLY $400,000 14 to 1.5-
more than
less than 14 to 1�
ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION w/Pavement reconstruction with $50015 15 to Is.
any of above items ;
less than 15 to 1$
ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION w/All new workunew roadway aligmmnt m0
moore re than 16 to 20
less than 10 to 12
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION w/ Roadway appoach under 100 ft. $200,000 11 to 13
more than
less than 11 to 13
I � RIDGE CONSTRUCTION w/Roadway appoach over 100 ft. 5400,000 12 tt 15
j more than
}
ATTACHMENT °B"
f _ DBE ANNUAL PLAN
TO: CALTRANS DISTRICT 05
Local Streets and Roads Civil Rights Coordinator
The of
requests approval of annual overall goal of % DBE for
Fiscal Year , beginning on and
ending on -
It is anticipated that the following Federal-Aid Highway projects
will be advertised during this Fiscal Year with preliminary DBE
participation levels established as shown. ( Include consultant
preliminary engineering and construction contracts anticipated for
award. )
ESTIMATED
PROJECT CONTRACT DBE
DESCRIPTION ITEMS COST PARTICIPATION TYPE OF WORK
{ (1) $ $
( 2) $ $ -
(3) $ $
( 4) $ $
(5) $ $
GRAND TOTAL $ $
DBE ,_%
DATE
DBE LIAISON OFFICER
i
ATTACHMENT "C"
THIS CITY OF FOR FEDERAL-AID
HIGHWAY PROJECTS HAS SET -AN ANNUAL .GOAL FOR THE 1987-88
FISCAL YEAR OF FOR DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS
ENTERPRISES (DBE) .
THE GOAL ESTABLISHMENT PROCEDURE WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR
PUBLIC INSPECTION FOR A PERIOD OF 30 DAYS AT CITY HALL
IN THE OFFICE.
COMMENTS ON THESE GOALS WILL BE RECEIVED IN THE ABOVE-
MENTIONED OFFICE AND BY THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF .
TRANSPORTATION, WASHINGTON, D. C. , FOR A PERIOD OF 45 DAYS
FROM THE DATE OF THIS NOTICE.
•
RESOLUTION 96-87
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF ATASCADERO
APPROVING A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
BETWEEN THE CITY OF ATASCADERO AND
THE ATASCADERO SERGEANTS SERVICE ORGANIZATION
WHEREAS, the City of Atascadero has met and conferred in good
faith with the Atascadero Sergeants Service Organization for the
purpose of discussing wages, benefits, and other conditions of
employment; and
WHEREAS, the City of Atascadero and the Atascadero Sergeants
Service Organization Bargaining Unit have reached an agreement
regarding said wages, benefits, and other conditions of employ-
ment for the term of Fiscal Year 1987/88; and
• NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Atascadero City
Council hereby approves the Memorandum of Understanding between
the City and the Atascadero Sergeants Service Organization for
Fiscal Year 1987/88, and authorizes the City Manager , as the
Employee Relations Officer , to enter into said agreement on
behalf of the City.
On motion by Councilperson and seconded
by Councilperson , the foregoing resolution is
hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call voter
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ADOPTED:
CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA
By:
BARBARA NORRIS, Mayor
(Res. 96-87 cont.)
ATTEST:
BOYD C. SHARITZ, City Clerk
PREPARED BY:
DAVID G. JORGENSEN, Director of
Administrative Services
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
MICHAEL SHELTON, City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
•
JEFFREY G. JORGENSEN, City Attorney
****PLEASE INCLUDE INT
THE 9/22 COUNCIL AGE
NDO L.
PACKET****
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
between the
CITY OF ATASCADERO
and the
ATASCADERO SERGEANTS SERVICE ORGANIZATION
This Memorandum of Understanding is made and entered into between
the representatives of the City of Atascadero and the representa-
tives of the Atascadero Sergeants Service Organization pursuant
to applicable sections of the Government Code and Atascadero
Municipal Code.
The parties have met and conferred in good faith regarding
employment terms and conditions for members of the Unit, and
having reached agreement submit this Memorandum to the City
Council with the joint recommendation that the Council resolve to
adopt its terms and conditions and take such other or additional
action as may be necessary to implement its provisions.
• SECTION 3. SALARIES
3.1 Base salaries in effect on 30 June 1987 shall be increased
by three and one-half percent (3 1/2%) effective the first
day of the first full pay period in July 1987 .
3.2 Base salaries in effect on 31 December 1987 shall be
increased by two and one-half percent (2 1/2%) effective
the first full pay period in January 1988.
3. 3 A salary compaction study will be completed and submitted
to the Council no later than January 1, 1988. It is agreed
that during the course of the study, the bargaining unit
will be consulted and negotiations will be re-opened
after January 1, 1988 for purposes of discussing the com-
paction study.
SECTION 4. MEDICAL/DENTAL BENEFITS
4.2 Current practices to continue.
4.3 No change.
SECTION 14. ACTING PAY
14.1 Employees in the classification of Police Sergeant who are
assigned to work as Acting Lieutenant shall receive out of
classification pay after working ten (10) cumulative shifts
as Acting Lieutenant in any fiscal year. All other provi-
sions of the Personnel Rules and Regulations regarding pay-
ment of out of classification pay remain unchanged.
•
SECTION 15. TERM OF AGREEMENT •
15.1 Unless specifically provided otherwise, the provisions of
this agreement shall go into effect 1 July 1987, and shall
remain in effect, unless modified by mutal agreement, until
midnight 30 June 1988.
SECTION 17. RETIREMENT
17.1 City will request and pay for an actuarial study to be per-
.formed by the PERS to determine the cost of implementing
the 2% @ 50 retirement plan. Such study to be requested in
September, but to use a 1 July 1988. effective date for
analysis purpose.
17.2 City agrees it has no philosophical opposition to 2% @ 50.
17.3 City agrees to negotiate 2% @ 50 during the next negotia-
tions, if such plan is proposed by the Organization. City
makes no promise to agree to 2% @ 50. City agrees, how-
ever, that agreement to 2% @ 50 is merely an economic
problem. If the economics can be agreed to, then 2% @ 50
can be implemented.
17.4 The City will continue to pay the employees' seven (7) per-
cent PERS contribution for the term of this agreement.
SECTION 18. RENEGOTIATIONS
18.1 If either party wants to negotiate a successor Agreement,
such party shall serve notice upon the other party between
15 March 1988 and 15 April 1988. •
18. 2 If a party requests negotiations pursuant to 18.1 above,
such party shall also submit initial proposals for a
successor Agreement no later than 15 April 1988.
18.3 If either party fulfills the requirements of Section 18.1
and 18 .2 above, then negotiations shall begin no later than
1 May 1988 .
SECTION 19. BRIEFING PAY
19.1 Each member of the bargaining unit will receive $25. 00 per
pay period as compensation for time spent in shift
change-over briefing.
SECTION 20. SIGNATURES
ATASCADERO SERGEANTS SERVICE
ORGANIZATION BARGAINING UNIT CITY OF ATASCADERO
i
WILLIAM WATTON, Sergeant DA D . /,JORGENSEN
Direc r of Admin. Svcs.
ALICIA I. LA A, -Specialist
Date: 04 Date: 1 �2 /
****PLEASE INCLUDE INTO
! A
THE 9/22 COUNCIL AGENDA S
PACKET****
RESOLUTION 97-87
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF ATASCADERO
ADOPTING A SALARY/CLASSIFICATION SCHEDULE
AND BENEFITS FOR
MID-MANAGEMENT/PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES
SECTION 1. Salaries
1.1 Base salaries in effect on 30 June 1987 shall be increased
by two and three-quarter percent (2 3/4%) effective
July 4, 1987 .
1.2 Base salaries in effect on 31 December 1987 shall be in-
creased by three and one-quarter percent (3 1/4%) effective
January 2, 1988.
1.3 A salary compaction study will be completed and submitted
to the Council no later than January 1, 1988. It is agreed
that: (a) during the course of the study a representative (s)
of the Mid-Management/Professional group will be consulted
• and (b) discussions will be re-opened after January 1, 1988.
SECTION 2. MEDICAL/DENTAL BENEFITS
2.1 The City shall pay all medical and dental benefit premiums
for the employee and dependents.
2.2 Those employees without dependents or who choose not to
enroll their dependents in the City plan will receive the
amount of the dependent premium as an addition to his/her
regular pay.
2.3 The City shall provide the same vision plan as agreed to in
the SEIU units for both employee and dependents, fully paid
by the City.
SECTION 3. ADMINISTRATIVE LEAVE
3.1 The City shall grant five (5) days of Administrative Leave
to be taken during Fiscal Year 1987-88.
3. 2 Administrative Leave hours will be available to each
employee effective July 1st annually.
3. 3 Time not used by June 30th annually, shall be forfeited.
SECTION 4. RETIREMENT
4.1 The City shall continue to pay the employee monthly contri-
bution (7% of base salary) to the Public Employees Retire-
ment System (PERS) .
•
•
(Resolution 97-87 cont. )
SECTION 5. LIFE INSURANCE
5.1 The City shall maintain a term life insurance policy on
each employee in the amount of Fifty-Thousand Dollars
($50,000) and the City shall pay the full premium amount
for such coverage.
5.2 The City shall maintain a term life insurance policy for
each eligible dependent of the employee in the amount of
One Thousand Dollars ($1,000) per dependent and the City
shall pay the full premium amount for such coverage.
SECTION 6. SICK LEAVE ACCRUAL
6.1 There will be no maximum limit on the amount of sick leave
an employee may accumulate.
SECTION 7. SICK LEAVE INCENTIVE
7.1 Eligibility - To be eligible for this benefit an employee
must:
a. Have accumulated 60 days of sick leave
b. The sick leave pay-off will occur the next 12-month
period (December 1 - November 30) after an employee has
accumulated and maintained the 60 days on the books.
6.2 Once the eligibility requirements have been met, an
employee will receive a pay-off equal to one-third (1/3) of
the unused annual allotment of sick leave. (The annual
allotment is 12 days. )
6.3 The time period for determining annual usage will be Decem-
ber lst to November 30th. Checks will be prepared by
December 15th.
SECTION 7. TUITION REIMBURSEMENT
7.1 The City shall conduct a tuition reimbursement study. This
study will be completed and submitted to the Council no
later than October 1, 1987 .
SECTION 8. EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PLAN
8.1 The City shall conduct a study of existing employee assist-
tance plans. The study will be completed and submitted to
Council no later than April 1, 1988 .
8.2 The City shall pay for and provide at least one stress
management course for employees no later than April 1, 1988 .
SECTION 9. STUDIES
9.1 As previously detailed, the City shall conduct 3 studies:
Compaction Study, Tuition Reimbursement Study and Employee
Assistance Plan Study. The City' s only commitment is to
study these topics. The City makes no commitment to change .
current practices in these areas. Representatives of the
Mid-Management/Professional group will be consulted during
the development of the recommendation for the Council.
***ITEM D-5 ATTACHMENT**
(Revised - 9/21/87 )
9/22/87 COUNCIL MEETING
• 1
RESOLUTION 97-87
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF ATASCADERO
ADOPTING A SALARY/CLASSIFICATION SCHEDULE
AND BENEFITS FOR
MID-MANAGEMENT/PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES
SECTION 1. Salaries
1.1 Base salaries in effect on 30 June 1987 shall be increased
by two and three-quarter percent (2 3/4%) effective
July 4, 1987.
1. 2 Base salaries in effect on 31 December 1987 shall be in-
creased by three and one-quarter percent (3 1/4%) effective
January 2, 1988 .
1. 3 A salary compaction study will be completed and submitted
to the Council no later than January 1, 1988. It is agreed
that: (a) during the course of the study a representative(s)
of the Mid-Management/Professional group will be consulted
• and (b) discussions will be re-opened after January 1, 1988 .
SECTION 2. MEDICAL/DENTAL BENEFITS
2.1 The City shall pay all medical and dental benefit premiums
for the employee and dependents.
2. 2 Those employees without dependents or who choose not to
enroll their dependents in the City plan will receive the
amount of the dependent premium as an addition to his/her
regular pay.
2.3 The City shall provide the same vision plan as agreed to in
the SEIU units for both employee and dependents, fully paid
by the City.
SECTION 3. ADMINISTRATIVE LEAVE
3.1 The City shall grant five (5) days of Administrative Leave
to be taken during Fiscal Year 1987-88.
3. 2 Administrative Leave hours will be available to each
employee effective July lst annually.
3.3 Time not used by June 30th annually, shall be forfeited.
SECTION 4. RETIREMENT
4.1 The City shall continue to pay the employee monthly contri-
bution (7% of base salary) to the Public Employees Retire-
ment System (PERS) .
4. 2 City will request and pay for an acturial study to be per-
formed by the PERS to determine the cost of implementing
a 2% @ 50 retirement plan for Safety employees. Such study
to be requested in September, but to use a 1 July 1988
effective date for analysis purpose.
4.3 City agrees it has no philosophical opposition to 2% @ 50.
(Resolution 97-87 cont. ) .
4.4 City agrees to negotiate 2% @ 50 during the next negotia-
tions, if such plan is proposed by the Safety employees.
City makes no promise to agree to 2% @ 50. City agrees,
however , that agreement to 2% @ 50 is merely an economic
problem. If the economics can be agreed to, then 2% @ 50
can be implemented for Safety employees.
SECTION 5. LIFE INSURANCE
5.1 The City shall maintain a term life insurance policy on
each employee in the amount of Fifty-Thousand Dollars
($50 ,000) and the City shall pay the full premium amount
for such coverage.
5. 2 The City shall maintain a term life insurance policy for
each eligible dependent of the employee in the amount of
One Thousand Dollars ($1, 000) per dependent and the City
shall pay the full premium amount for such coverage.
SECTION 6. SICK LEAVE ACCRUAL
6.1 There will be no maximum limit on the amount of sick leave
an employee may accumulate.
SECTION 7. SICK LEAVE INCENTIVE
7.1 Eligibility - To be eligible for this benefit an employee
must:
a. Have accumulated 60 days of sick leave
b. The sick leave pay-off will occur the next 12-month
period (December 1 - November 30) after an employee has
accumulated and maintained the 60 days on the books.
7. 2 Once the eligibility requirements have been met, an
employee will receive a pay-off equal to one-third (1/3) of
the unused annual allotment of sick leave. (The annual
allotment is 12 days. )
7.3 The time period for determining annual usage will be Decem-
ber 1st to November 30th. Checks will be prepared by
December 15th.
SECTION 8. HOLIDAY HOURS ACCRUED
8.1 All Safety employees shall be allowed to accrue 40 hours of
Holiday time on the books.
SECTION 9. TUITION REIMBURSEMENT
9 .1 The City shall conduct a tuition reimbursement study. This
study will be completed and submitted to the Council no
later than October 1, 1987 .
SECTION 10. EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PLAN
10.1 The City shall conduct a study of existing employee assist-
tance plans. The study will be completed and submitted to
Council no later than April 1, 1982 .
10. 2 The City shall pay for and provide at least one stress
management course for employees no later than April 1, 1988 .
• (Resolution 97-87 cont. )
SECTION 11. STUDIES
11.1 Aa previously detailed, the City shall conduct 3 studies:
Compaction Study, Tuition Reimbursement Study and Employee
Assistance Plan Study. The City' s only commitment is to
study these topics. The City makes no commitment to change
current practices in these areas. Representatives of the
Mid-Management/Professional group will be consulted during
the development of the recommendation for the Council.
On motion by Councilperson and seconded
by Councilperson , the foregoing resolution is
hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ADOPTED:
CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA
By:
BARBARA NORRIS, Mayor
ATTEST: P$EPARED BY:
PCI
1
BOYD C. SHARITZ, City Clerk DAVID G ; JORGENSEN, Director of
Adminisvra�ive Services
APPROVED AS
TO
CONTENT: APPROVED AS _TO FORM:
MICHAEL SHELTON, City Manager JEFFREY G. JORGENSEN, City Attorney
AGREED TO:
STEVE DE CAMP, Repres tative to
Mid-Management/Professional Unit
__Yiz 4�"" L�
L
J
•
RESOLUTION 98-87
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF ATASCADERO
AMENDING THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
BETWEEN THE CITY OF ATASCADERO AND
LOCAL 817 SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION
ATASCADERO CHAPTER CLERICAL BARGAINING UNIT
WHEREAS, the City Council has previously approved a
Memorandum of Understanding with the SEIU Clerical Bargaining
Unit by passing Resolution 75-87; and
WHEREAS, it has been mutually agreed upon by both repre-
sentatives of the bargaining unit and the city negotiators to
amend said Memorandum of Understanding; and
WHEREAS, the bargaining unit has voted and ratified the
proposed change by a unanimous vote of its members; and
• NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Atascadero City
Council hereby approves the attached amendment to the Memorandum
of Understanding between the City and Local 817 Service Employees
International Union Atascadero Chapter Clerical Bargaining Unit
for Fiscal Years 1987/88, 1988/89 and 1989/90 and authorizes the
City Manager, as the Employee Relations Officer , to approve the
attached amendment on behalf of the City.
On motion by Councilperson and seconded
by Councilperson the foregoing resolution is
hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call votes:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ADOPTED:
CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA
By:
BARBARA NORRIS, Mayor
•
0
•
(Res. 98-87 cont. )
ATTEST:
BOYD C. SHARITZ, City Clerk
PREPARED BY:
DAVID G. JORGENSEN, Director. of
Administrative Services
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
MICHAEL SHELTON, City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
•
JEFFREY G. JORGENSEN, City Attorney
i
! 0
AMENDMENT NUMBER 1
to the
1987-90
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
between the
CITY OF ATASCA,DERO
and
LOCAL 617 , SERVICE EMPLOYEE INTERNATIONAL UNION ,
ATASCADERO CHAPTER
CLERICAL UNIT
This Amendment is entered into between the authorized
representatives of City of Atascadero, hereinafter referred to as
"City ," and of Local 817 of the Service Employees' International
Union , AFL-CIO , Atascadero Chapter , hereinafter referred to as
"Union. "
Section 6 , Salaries and Health Insurance shall be amended by
adding the following:
• 6. 1 .5 Special Adjustments:
In addition to increases provided above , the City shall
make special range adjustments of 2.5% on the first day
of the first full pay period in January 1968 and
January 1989 for the position of Support Services Aide.
This Amendment shall have the same term as the MOU it modifies.
The parties agree to take whatever action is appropriate to
implement the conditions of this Amendment .
S'g at es:,
Union City J
2 Z}7 Y7 9 h c
Dat Date
i }A
I
MEMORANDUM
10: Board of Directors
THROUGH: Mike Shelton , City Manager
FROM: Paul M. Sensibauah . Director of Public Works
SUBJECT : Sewer Annexation - Dr . Carnazzo
DATE: September 14 , 1987
Recommendation :
Staff recommends that the Board approve the attached
Resolution annexing Lot 214 , Block NC into the boundaries of
Improvement District No . 4 .
Background:
In February of this year the Board approved Resolution
No . 23-87 which provided for the extension of sewer lines to
an area just outside the boundary of Improvement District
No . 4 .
Dr . Carnazzo is asking to be allowed to annex to
improvement District No . 4 and connect to this sewer
extension when it is completed . Dr . Carnazzo is at this
time experiencing problems from a malfunctioning septic
system.
Fiscal Impact :
There is no cost to the District related to this
annexation . The Applicant will be required to pay all
annexation fees and connection fees in effect at the time of
connection , along with a portion of the above mentioned
sewer line extension which will be handled through a
reimbursement agreement .
r
RESOLUTION NO. 100-87
A RESOLUTION OF THE ATASCADERO COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICT APPROVING EXTENDING PUBLIC SEWER SERVICE TO
LOT 214 BLOCK NC AND INCORPORTING THE AREA
CONCERNED INTO THE BOUNDARIES OF IMPROVEMENT
DISTRICT NO. 4
(4525 Navidad)
WHEREAS, the Atascadero County Sanitation District is
empowered by Section 4834 of the Health and Safety Code to
annex territory already a part of the County Sanitation
District to the Improvement District of that County Sanitation
District ; and
WHEREAS , Dr . Wm. Carnazzo owns the property described in
Exhibits A and B attached to this resolution ; and
WHEREAS, said, property, located at 4525 Navidad is
contiguous with Improvement District #4 ; and
WHEREAS, said property is within the Urban Services Line
on the City' s Land Use and Circulation General Plan Map and is
consistant with the General Plan : and
WHEREAS, the proposed annexation has received a
Categorical Exemption pursuant to the provisions of
Environmental (duality Act ;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Directors of tree
Atascadero County Sanitation District as follows :
Section 1 . The Board finds that the territory described
in this resolution will be benefitted by such sewer service
(Health and Safety Code Section 4830)
Section 2 . The Board approves the extension of public
sewer service to the following parcel , subject to the payment
of appropriate fees as listed in the Atascadero County
Sanitation District Code :
Lot 214 Block NC APN 28-292-17
Section 3 . The area included in APN 28-292-17 , Lot 214 ,
Block NC is hereby incorporated into the boundaries of
Improvement District NO. 4 .
Section 4 . The above action is conditional upon said lot
being a part of the sewer reirttbursement agreement that will be
filed for the sewer extension approved by Resolution 23-87 .
On motion by Board Member and seconded by
Board Member ,the foregoing resolution is adopted
in its entirety by the following roll call vote .
AYES :
NOES :
ABSENT :
DATE:
ATTEST : ATASCADERO COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT
MICHAEL B. SHELTON BARBARA NORRIS
Secretary President
iAPPROVED AS TO FORM APPROVED AS TO CONTENT
------------------------- ------------------------
JEFFREY G. JORGENSEN PAUL M. SENSIBAUGH
City Attorney Dir , of Public Works
EXHIBIT "A"
Being a portion of the subdivision of the Atascadero Colony recorded
in the Office of the County Recorder, San Luis Obispo County, State
of California. Described herein as Lot 214 of Tract NC of the
Atascadero Colony Subdivision. APN 28-292-17
EXHIBIT B (-
x �
0 - —
1
0 ■° A
ro o
+l L=J
E W C=i
m fA LTJ �d
N 1-4 LTJ LTJ _ A05.S3 w JQOss.s ~ f°
K Z ti \ �;` s pie w
O b
4 ro' 4
fD
R a
N, - ens•a .�� w
O cn �QNj�
E i w
N .. :t-« y i-zT .ss- a a` ee n
cts •
D -�
Pt H•
Oprr
w
N1 N 26°05.26E -'�
',�.y D y •r "o, 11°2S 29'w :/r.ar .�.��
O fA I ro O
n rn v
b y Q 1� m
y �;O a
Qmrn
R
Z
2p cc
rt
tV
�. - , ti 4oc •41
- 3+ rui 1
0 to
CD
S 'Sep�4iW z /NC Nof q yT
.. - u• ,Tq C.oti py
O O S 40t-^Iq� V
m t no BSA;
O
4
Z
.4 g O
-c
rn
E: O n Z
O� 4 O
—
0 co
—4 rrl
" __ ; N