Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda Packet 04/28/1987
CINDY WILKINS D1:-:7PUTY ,CITY CLERK AGENDA ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL REGULAR GULAR MEETING ATASCADERO ADMINISTRATION BUILDING FOURTH FLOOR, ROTUNDA ROOM APRIL 28 , 1987 7:30 P. M,' ** Administration of Oath of Office for Newly Appointed City Council Member Charles Bourbeau City Council Members: (Seating from Left to Right: ) Council Member Norris Michael Shelton Council Member Bourbeau City Manager Mayor Mackey Jeffrey G. Jorgensen Council Member Handshy City Attorney Council Member Borgeson Boyd C. Sharitz City Clerk RULES OF PUBLIC PARTICIPATION * Members of the audience may speak on any item on the agenda. * A person may speak for three (3) minutes. If a group has a spokesperson, the spokesperson may speak for five ,(5) minutes. * No one may speak for a second time until everyone wishing to speak has had an opportunity to do so. * No one may speak more than twice on any item. * Council members may question any speaker; the speaker may respond; but after the alloted time has expired, may not initiate further discussion. * The floor will then be closed to public participation and open for Council discussion. Call to Order Pledge of Allegiance Invocation - Reverend Larry Etter Roll Call ** Council Consideration Regarding Mayor Pro Tem Appointment ** Council Consideration Regarding Treasurer Appointment ** Proclamation Acknowledging "National Police Week" from May • 10-16, 1987 1 ** Proclamation Acknowledging "National Fire Recognition Day" on May 9, 1987 ** Introduction of New Employee Melinda Fielder, Support Services Aide for the Police Department ** Introduction of New Employee William Wittmeyer, Senior Building Inspector for the Community Development Department Building Division (Approximate Time 30 Minutes) COMMUNITY FORUM The City Council values and encourages exchange of ideas and comments from you the citizen. The public comment period is provided to receive comments from the public on matters other than scheduled agenda items. To increase the effectiveness of Community Forum, the following rules will be enforced: * A maximum of 30 minutes will be allowed for Community Forum, unless Council authorizes an extension. * All remarks shall be addressed to Council as a whole and not to any individual member thereof. * No questions shall be asked of a Council Member or City staff without permission of the Mayor. * No person shall be allowed to make slanderous, profane, impertinent, or personal remarks against any Council Member . * Any person desiring to submit written statements may do so by forwarding to Council, prior to the Council Meeting, nine (9) copies to the City Clerk by 5:00 p.m. on the Wednesday preceeding the Council Meeting. * Community Forum Presentation by Pat Duncan regarding Low Flying Aircraft over Atascadero and Alternate Routing (15Minutes) (Approximate Time - 5 Minutes) A. CONSENT CALENDAR All maters listed under Item A, Consent Calendar , are considered to be routine, and will be enacted by one motion in the form listed below. There will be no separate discussion of these items. A member of the Council or public may, by request, have any item removed from the Consent Agenda, which shall then be added to and taken up at the end of the "New Business" section of the agenda. 1. Approval of Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of April 14, 1987 2. Approval of Minutes of the Special Council Meeting of March 30, 1987 2 I� 3. Approval of the Finance Director ' s Monthly Report - March, 1987 4. Approval of the Treasurer ' s Monthly Report - March, 1987 5. Acknowledging Proclamation for "Clean Air Week" from April 27 to May 3, 1987 6. Authorization to Solicit Bids to Purchase New Dial-A-Ride Bus 7. Authorization for Mayor to Enter into Agreement with Bruce Walker Consultants - Administration Building Fourth Floor Rotunda Room Acoustics and Sound Reinforcement System Improvements 8. Authorization for City Manager to Enter into Proposed Memorandum of Understanding with Atascadero Unified School District - Gasoline Disbursement for Vehicles 9. Approval of Tentative Lot Line Adjustment 3-87 - 7055 Llano Road - Wood/Cuesta Engineering 10. Approval of Tentative Lot Line Adjustment 5-87 - 3905 E1 Camino Real - Zimmer/Volbrecht Surveys 11. Approval of Tentative Lot Line Adjustment 6-87 - 3275/3355 Ramona Road - St Clair/North Coast Engineering • 12. Approval of Tentative Tract Map 21-86 - Lots\1, 2,4,5,6,7, & 8 of PM 28-30 (Santa Lucia & Lomitas Roads) - Subdivision of 6 Existing Lots totaling 119.6 Acres into 22 Lots Varying from 26.3 Acres to 3.1 Acres 13. Approval of Tentative Parcel Map 3-87 - 9005 Atascadero Ave. - Subdivision of .93 Acre Parcel into 2 .46 Acre Lots - Shultz/ Baumberger 14. Approval of Tentative Tract Map 4-87 - 9240 Atascadero Ave. - Subdivision of 4.93 Acre Parcel into 10 20,100 Square Foot - 24,720 Square Foot Lots - Hawkins/Cuesta Engineering 15. Approval of Tentative Parcel Map 5-87 - 8925 Atascadero Ave - Subdivision of 1. 66 Acre Parcel into 3 Lots of . 5, .5, & .66 Acres Ea. Fisher 16. Acceptance of Final Parcel Map 4-86 - 8855 & 8905 San Pedro Rd - Cassera/Cuesta Engineering 17. Acceptance of Final Parcel Map 25-86 - 8375 Portola Road - Wright/North Coast Engineering 18. Acceptance of Final Lot Line Adjustment 5-86 - 4685 Lobos - Riggs/Watkins/Twin Cities Engineering • 19 . Acknowledging Proclamation for Be Kind to AnimalsWeek - May 3-9 , 1987 20 . Acknowledging Proclamation for Organ Donor Awareness Week - April 26 - May 2 , 1987 3 0 0 B. HEARINGS/APPEARANCES/REPORTS (Approximate Time - 15 Minutes) 1. Zone Change 1-87 - 9385 Vista Bonita (Lots 6, 7, & 10-15) Nimmo/Yeomans ,A. Ordinance 151 - Amend Existing Zoning of Residential Single Family, 1-1/2 to 2-1/2 Acre Minimum Lot Size to Residential Single Family with a Planned Development Overlay Zone 7 (FIRST READING) (Approximate Time - 15 Minutes) 2. Proposed Revisions to South Atascadero General Plan Amend- ment Environmental Impact Report Study Area C. NEW BUSINESS (Approximate Time - 10 Minutes) 1. Resolution 39-87 - Authorization for Public Works Director and City Manager to Execute Certificates of Acceptance for Real Estate in Behalf of the City of Atascadero (Approximate Time - 5 Minutes) 2. Resolution 31-87 Declaring Weeds a Nuisance and Approval for Weed Abatement Procedures to Commence • D. ATASCADERO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT (Council will recess and convene as the Atascadero County Sanitation District Board of Directors) (Approximate Time - 10 Minutes) 1. Authorization for Public Works Director to Solicit Bids for Inflow and Infiltration Analysis Project to the Wastewater Treatment Plant (Approximate Time - 15 Minutes) 2. Assessment District #3 (Marchant Way) Funding Change Order Request for Excavation (West Coast Tank and Pipe Company) (Approximate Time - 20 Minutes) 3. Appeal of Sewer Annexation Fee Revised Requirement - 10705 El Camino Real (Casa Camino Apartments) - Messer (Approximate Time - 15 Minutes) 4. Appeal of Sewer Annexation Fee Requirement - 7620 Santa Ynez - Kelly 4 E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION • 1. City Council Committee Appointments: a. Traffic Committee (Consideration to appoint Planning Commission member) b. City/School Committee C. San Luis Obispo Area Coordinating Council (alternate representative) 2. City Attorney 3. City Clerk 4 City Treasurer 5. City Manager 19. Proclamation - Acknowledging May 3-9, 1987 as "Be Kind to Animals Week" 20. Proclamation Acknowledging April 26 - May 2, 1987 as "Organ Donor Awareness Week" 5 il F-A F11-j._a fr1� 1915 C, 1979 P R O C L A M A T I O N "NATIONAL POLICE WEEK" MAY 10-16, 1987 WHEREAS, National Police Week for this year begins on Sunday May 10, and extends through Saturday May 16; and WHEREAS, May 15 of each year is designated as National Police Memorial Day; and WHEREAS, the purpose of the week-long observance is to pay tribute to all law enforcement personnel who, on a daily basis, make our cities amore safe and secure place to live; and WHEREAS, some officers across the nation are killed in the line of duty, never to return to their homes and families; and WHEREAS, the Atascadero Police Department was organized - in July, 1980 , and has provided outstanding traffic and crime en- forcement, as well as thousands of hours of service to Atascadero citizens who have sought some level of assistance; and WHEREAS, the Department is approaching the seventh anni- versary of its existence in the community; and WHEREAS, it is appropriate that all Atascaderans join in support of law enforcement at all levels and, more specifically, the Atascadero Police Department in order to demonstrate our con- cern and respect for these valuable public servants. THEREFORE, I Marjorie R. Mackey, Mayor of the City of Atascadero, do hereby proclaim May 10-16 at "National Police Week" in Atascadero, and Friday, May 15, as "Atascadero Loves Its Cops Day" , and urge all citizens to recognize and appreciate our 25 sworn Police Officers and Police Department support personnel. MARJORIE R. MACKEY Mayor April 28 , 1987 � � DST ,� �� iTEnn y '1 ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL • MINUTES April 14 , 1987 Atascadero Administration Building The regular meeting of the Atascadero City Council was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Mayor Mackey, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. An invocation was given by John Taylor, Minister, Church of Christ. ROLL-CALL Present: Councilmembers Borgeson, Handshy, Norris and Mayor Mackey Absent: None STAFF Bud McHale, Police Chief/Acting City Manager; David Jorgensen, Admin- istrative Services Director; Mike Hicks, Fire Chief; Henry Engen, Community Development Director; Paul Sensibaugh, Public Works Direc- tor; Jeffrey Jorgensen, City Attorney; Boyd Sharitz, City Clerk; Cindy Wilkins, Deputy City Clerk COMMUNITY FORUM - No public comment • COUNCIL COMMENT Mayor Mackey presented a plaque to outgoing Councilman George Molina in recognition for his five years of service on the City Council (June '82 through March 187 -- June 186 to March 187 as Mayor Pro Tem) . A. CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Approval of Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of March 24, 1987 2. Approval of Parking/Crosswalk Amendments in Relation to Monterey Road Elementary School: A. Resolution 37-87 - Designating a "No Parking" Zone on Monter ey Road at Monterey Road School (between the two main driveway entrances to the school) B. Resolution 36-87 - Relocation of School Crosswalk on Monterey Road at Monterey Road School 3. Approval of Tentative Lot Line Adustment 4-87 5505-5555 Bajada Adjusting Property Line between 2 Existing Lots - Jones/Lebovic (Cuesta Engineering) • 1 b 0 • *4. Denial of Claim by David Hunt and Douglas Nix Representing a Class Action Claim in the Amount of $1, 500, 000 for Damage Cau0 by. Requirements to Hook Up to Sewer System 5. Approval for Mayor to Enter into an Encroachment Permit with Cal- trans - Planting of Trees at San Diego Way and Highway 101 6. Approval of Final Parcel Map 28-84 - 9095 La Paz Road - Doyle Dun- ham 7. Acknowledgement of Proclamation Acknowledging Earthquake Prepared- ness Month - April 1987 Jaime Lopez-Balbontin requested Item #4 be pulled for discussion. (*Item moved to New Business) . MOTION: By Councilwoman Norris to approve Consent Calendar , minus #4, seconded by Councilwoman Borgeson; passed unanimously (4:0) by roll-call. B. HEARINGS, APPEARANCES & REPORTS 1. Resolution 34-87 - Approval of Proposed Road Abandonment - (Lots 51-53, Block 55) Portion of Chorro Road - Landis Mr. Engen, Commun. Devel. Director, gave staff report. There was no public comment. 0 MOTION: By Councilwoman Borgeson to adopt Res. No. 34-87, seconded by Councilwoman Norris; passed unanimously (4:0) by roll-call. 2. Zone Change 23-86 - 7421 Santa Ysabel - California Manor (Young) A. Ordinance 150 - Revising Existing Zoning to Lot 6, Block 1A, from Residential Multiple Family, 16 Units Per Acre with a Planned Development Overlay (allowing reduced lot size develop- ment) (FIRST READING) Mr. Engen, Commun. Devel. Director, gave staff report and responded to questions from Council. Public Comment Judy Young, applicant, spoke in support of this project as proposed. She noted the proposal would actually decrease the allowed density (7 apts. or 7 condominiums) on the site by utilizing the PD overlay ap- proach, which is an option in lieu of condominiums; she urged Council to consider this in reviewing the project. Ted Young, co-applicant, clarified that he has permits for four units and is asking approval for a fifth. • 2 • 0 MOTION: By Councilman Handshy to concur with staff recommendations to approve Ord. 150 revising the existing zoning from RMF/16 (Residential Multiple Family, 16 units per acre) to RMF/16 (PD) ; motion died for lack of a second. MOTION: By Councilwoman Norris to continue this item until the next meeting; motion died for lack of a second. MOTION: By Councilwoman Borgeson to deny this request (Ord. 150) , seconded by Mayor Mackey. Judy Young applicant, expressed confusion as to the action proposed by this motion, which prompted further discussion between Council and staff; Mr. Engen clarified that denial by Council would preclude the option of subdividing the lots, and they could not be sold separately but would be defined as rentals. MOTION: By Councilwoman Borgeson to withdraw the previous motion, seconded by Mayor Mackey. MOTION: By Councilwoman Norris to continue this item and direct staff to prepare a revised ordinance authorizing a four-unit PD for consideration by Council as soon as possible, seconded by Councilwoman Borgeson; passed 3:1, with Councilman Handshy opposed. C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Ordinance 149 - Amending the Zoning Text on Multiple Family Res- idential Zoning Standards (Zone Change 3-87) (SECOND READING) (Cont'd from 3/24/87) Mr. Engen, Commun. Devel. Director, gave staff report. There was no public comment. MOTION: By Councilwoman Borgeson to read Ord. 149 by title only, sec- onded by Councilwoman Norris; passed unanimously. Mayor Mackey read Ord. . 149 by title. MOTION: By Councilwoman Borgeson that this constitutes the second reading and adoption of Ord. 149, seconded by Councilwoman Norris; passed unanimously (4:0) by roll-call. 2. Resolution 35-87 - Approval of Appearance Review Manual Guide- lines for New Construction Mr. Engen, Commun. Devel. Director, gave staff report. Public Comment Richard Shannon, #25 Quail Ridge, asked if the proposed standards ap- ply to SFR' s on hillsides and not just residential and multi-family. Mr. Engen responded that the standards, generally, are not intended to 3 apply to SFR' s but may in some primary viewshed areas; he noted the review process is intended to be re-evaluated after one year for p sible revisions. Mr. Shannon spoke in opposition to application the ARM Guidelines to SFR' s, noting that their intent originally re- sulted from concerns expressed about various commercial and multi- family buildings in the community and seems to have expanded. Tom Bench, resident, noted a recent Supreme Court case which declared it unconstitutional to dictate what people can do with their build- ings, wondering if that decision would bear on this issue; Mr. Jor- gensen, City Atty. , responded that the California courts have consis- tently upheld design review standards when reasonably applied. MOTION: By Councilman Handshy to approve Res. 35-87, including amend- ing Pg. 5 of the Appearance Review Manual, para. 6, to read, "*ANY PROJECT, EXCEPT FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES, THAT OCCURS WITHIN A HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT. . . " , seconded by Councilwoman Norris; passed unanimously (4:0) by roll-call. Mr. Engen noted that implementation of the guidelines will go into effect on May 15th. D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Authorization to Solicit Requests for Proposals for Computer Equipment Mr. Jorgensen, Admin. Svcs. Director, gave staff report. There was public comment. MOTION: By Councilman Handshy to approve the time schedule and bid documents to solicit proposals for a financial computer system and departmental word processing, seconded by Council- woman Borgeson; passed unanimously. 2. Resolution 32-87 - Authorization for the City Manager to Enter into Agreement with. AT&T for Telephone Equipment - Fire Sta- tion #2 Chief Hicks, AFD, gave staff report. There was no public comment. MOTION: By Councilman Handshy to authorize the City Manager to sign a contract agreement with AT&T for telephone equipment at Fire Station #2, seconded by Councilwoman Norris; passed unani- mously (4:0) by roll-call. 3. Approval of Lease/Purchase of New Pierce Fire Engine in the Amount of $129 , 546 .00 Chief Hicks, AFD, gave staff report. Mr . Jorgensen, Admin. Svc Director, reported on the financial aspects of this proposal, noti0 that the current figures are based on a 5-7 year lease agreement. 4 MOTION: By Councilwoman Norris to authorize staff to purchase the • requested fire engine and to adopt Res. No. 32-87, seconded by Councilwoman Borgeson; passed unanimously (4:0) by roll- call. 4. (*This item pulled from Consent Calendar. ) Denial of Claim by David Hunt and Douglas Nix Representing a Class Action Claim in the Amount of $1,500 ,000 for Damages Caused by Requirements to Hook Up to Sewer System Mr. Lopez-Balbontin, who requested this item be pulled for discussion, asked if the City Attorney could provide a verbal summary of this claim without jeopardizing the City' s position. Mr. Jorgensen, City Atty. , advised that a copy of the claim can be made available to any interested citizen, and he encouraged Mr. Lopez-Balbontin to see staff to review it. Mr. Lopez-Balbontin urged that, if necessary, the City counter-sue for any court costs related to this matter. MOTION: By Councilman Handshy to deny this claim as recommended by City insurance adjustors, seconded by Councilwoman Norris; passed unanimously. COUNCIL RECESSED FOR BREAK AT 8 :45 P.M. MAYOR MACKEY CALLED THE MEET- ING BACK TO ORDER AT 8 :55 P.M. • E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION 1. City Council A. Status Report - New Council Member Recruitment and Selection Process Mr. Jorgensen, Admin. Svcs. Director, gave staff report prepared by the City Manager and reviewed the recruitment/interview materials pre- pared by the City Clerk' s Office. Councilwoman Borgeson requested that the record reflect her support for a one vote per ballot process. Mayor Mackey would like each Coun- cilmember to vote for three candidates on the first voting round. Councilman Handshy suggested ranking candidates after interviews and making a selection on that basis. Councilwoman Norris requested that the record reflect her opposition to two votes on the first ballot but that she will go along with it. After discussion, Council concurred to vote for two candidates on the first voting round and one each on subsequent ballot (s) . 5 B. Open House - Government Day (Norris) Councilwoman Norris withdrew this request due to staff having di4 cussed and recommending to hold individual department open houses (see staff report in agenda packet) . Council & staff discussed the suggested "Student Government Day" men- tioned in the staff report. Mayor Mackey directed, at Councilwoman Borgeson' s suggestion, staff to prepare a letter thanking the Parks & Rec. Commission for meeting with Council last week in a special joint meeting. Mayor Mackey announced "Clean Air Awareness Week" will be declared by the SLO County Board of Supvrs. for the week of 4/27-5/3; she request- ed that the Fire Dept. cancel the 5/2-5/5 burn period in Atascadero in observance of this. All County fire protection agencies are being requested to do the same. City Attorney - Mr. Jorgensen noted he doesn' t plan to attend Coun- cil interviews tomorrow, but will be on call should he be needed. City Manager - Acting City Manager , Bud McHale, declared tommorrow a legal holiday for all City staff -- APRIL FOOLS! ! MEETING ADJOURNED AT 9:15 P.M. TO SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING ON WEDNEO DAY, 9:00 A.M. , APRIL 15 , 1987 IN THE ADMINISTRATION BUILDING FOURTH FLOOR CLUB ROOM FOR THE PURPOSE OF INTERVIEWING AND APPOINTING A NEW CITY COUNCIL MEMBER. MINUTES RECORDED BY: BOYD C. SHARITZ, City Clerk MINUTES PREPARED BY: CINDY WILKINS, Deputy City Clerk 6 qk; AGv40A i i EM • ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Special Meeting - March 30 , 1987 Atascadero Administration Building The Special Meeting of the Atascadero City Council was called to order at 7: 30 p.m. by Mayor Mackey, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL-CALL Present: Councilmembers Borgeson, Handshy, Norris and Mayor Mackey Absent: Councilman Molina (Resigned, effective 3/26/87) STAFF Mike Shelton, City Manager; Jeffrey Jorgensen, City Attorney; Lt. Chuck Hazelton, Police Department; Boyd Sharitz, City Clerk; Cindy Wilkins, Deputy City Clerk 1. Motion Acknowledging the Resignation of Council Member George • Molina, Effective March 26 , 1987 MOTION: By Councilwoman Borgeson to acknowledge, with regret, the resignation of Council Member George Molina, effective 3/26/87, seconded by Councilwoman Norris; passed unanimously (4:0) by roll-call 2. City Council Discussion Regarding City Council Member Replacement Procedures Mr. Shelton, City Manager, gave staff report, summarizing alternatives available to Council (i.e. , appointment, special election or the next regular election, 11/3/87, pursuant to Govt. Code Sec. 36512) . Public Comment . Robert Nimmo, 7375 Bella Vista Rd. , urged Council to move expeditious- ly in this matter, feeling it' s in the best interest of the public . to have a full Council to address upcoming issues; he spoke in favor of Council appointment to fill the vacancy and urged that the proposed application deadline be moved up to prior than April 17th. Terrill Graham, 6205 Conejo Rd. , expressed that he feels, opposite than Mr. Nimmo, that the community needs a time of reflection on past • events which may have led to the occurrence of this Council vacancy and on the direction that the City has been going in; he spoke in favor of election, although expensive, as the replacement alternative. Council discussed their individual feelings on this matter : • Councilwoman Borgeson spoke in favor of appointment rather than election in view of upcoming weighty matters before the Council (i.e. , budget hearings) which would best be decided by a full Coun- cil. Councilman Handshy felt that, although all three alternatives are viable, the appointment method is probably the best because it can be accomplished soonest. He agreed with Mr . Nimmo that the proposed application deadline (4/17) should be moved up. He suggested that applicants be required to obtain nomination papers from the City Clerk' s Office and get the signatures of 30 registered Atascadero voters. He would also like to have a fact sheet from each applicant expressing their views on various issues and their general feelings about Atascadero and its future. Then, from interviews, the Council can make a decision on a replacement for Councilman Molina. Councilwoman Norris spoke in support of a Council appointment to the vacancy due to the cost which would be incurred in view of the short length of the term remaining (which ends in June 1988) . Mr. Jorgensen, City Attorney, noted a concern that, although he doesn' t see a problem with the requirement for applicants to obtain signatures, there is a relatively short period in the proposed t' frame to verify them at the County Clerk ' s Office. Council discussed possible requirements of applicants to the vacancy. COUNCIL RECESSED FOR BREAK AT 7 :58 P.M. IN ORDER TO ALLOW STAFF THE OPPORTUNITY TO REDRAFT THE PROPOSED APPLICATION FORM IN VIEW OF CON- CERNS EXPRESSED BY COUNCIL. MAYOR MACKEY CALLED THE MEETING BACK TO ORDER AT 8:15 P.M. Mayor Mackey read aloud the redrafted application form. Regarding the recruitment schedule, Council concurred that the pro- posed recruitment schedule is to be amended as follows: * Begin Advertisement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .April 1, 1987 * Application Deadline. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .April 10 , 1987 (5: 00 p.m. ) * Status Report @ Council Meeting. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .April 14, 1987 * Council Interview and Appointment. . . . . . . . . . . . . .April 15, 1987 (Special Meeting - Time to be Announced) MOTION: By Councilman Handshy that the City Council appoint a r - placement to fill the remainder of Councilman Molina's in office (to June 7, 1988) and that the application formir recruitment schedule are amended as announced, seconded by Councilwoman Borgeson; passed unanimously (4:0) by roll-call. 2 0 3. City Council Discussion Regarding Mayor Pro Tempore Replacement Procedures Councilwoman Borgeson suggested that this item not be discussed at this point in time, with which Council concurred. Mr. Sharitz , City Clerk, announced that applications to the City Coun- cil vacancy will be available in and should be returned to the City Clerk ' s Office. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 8 :22 P.M. MINUTES RECORDED BY: BOYD. C. SHARITZ, City Clerk MINUTES RECORDED BY: CINDY WILKINS, Deputy City Clerk t�7L"F rC IL CITY OF ATASCADERO • FINANCE DIRECTOR'S REPORT MARCH 1, 1987 TO MARCH 31, 1987 BALANCE AS OF FEBRUARY 28, 1987 20, 569. 80 DEPOSITED BY TREASURER, SEE RECEIPTS, TREASURER'S REPORT, PAGE 1 701, 656 .28 TOTAL 722, 226 .08 HAND CHECK REGISTER DATED 03/31/87 2, 451. 50 CHECK REGISTER DATED 03/06/87 149,139.24 CHECK REGISTER DATED 03/13/87 75,860. 97 CHECK REGISTER DATED 03/20/87 106,908.31 CHECK REGISTER DATED 03/27/87 63 ,256 .47 SERVICE CHARGE-MASTERCARD 2. 50 EXPENSE LISTING 169, 522.29 TOTAL 567 ,141.28 BALANCE AS OF MARCH 31, 1987 155, 084. 80 PETTY CASH 540 .00 TREASURY INVESTMENTS SEE TREASURER' S REPORT, PAGE 2 3,336 ,000 .00 TOTAL 3 ,491,624.80 I, DAVID JORGENSEN, do hereby certify and declare that demands enumerated and referred to in the foregoing register are accurate and just claims against the City and that there are funds available for payment thereof in the City Treasury. DATED: April 28 , 1987 DAVIDROENSEN Admin. e(vices Director 4 CITY OF ATASCADERO FINANCE DIRECTOR'S REPORT • MARCH 1, 1987 TO MARCH 31, 1987 EXPENSE LISTING PAYROLL DATED 03/04/87 CHECKS #38715-38826 85 , 257.10 PAYROLL DATED 03/18/87 CHECKS #38827-38939 85 ,848.48 VOID CK#33813 CK. REG. DATED 03/06/87 (79. 77) VOID CK#32981 CK. REG. DATED 01/09/87 (20 .00) VOID CK#33191 CK. REG. DATED 01/23/87 (750.00) VOID CK#25979 CK. REG. DATED 07/16/85 (80 .00) VOID CK#31160 CK. REG. DATED 03/09/87 (75 .00) VOID CK#33555 CK. REG. DATED 02/20/87 (247 .50) VOID CK#31236 CK. REG. DATED 09/05/86 (331.02) TOTAL 169, 522. 29 5 ILII CITY OF ATASCADERO TREASURER'S REPORT • MARCH 1, 1987 TO MARCH 31, 1987 TAXES Property Tax 10,039.97 Cigarette Tax 4 ,174.24 Motor Vehicle "In Lieu" 46,928.61 . Sales Tax 60 ,706.93 Franchise Tax 2,700 .66 Livestock-Head Day Tax 191.94 Development Impact Tax 28,256 .00 LICENSES/PERMITS/FEES 59,062. 40 DEVELOPMENT FEES 164,895.09 PARKS & RECREATION FEES 27,788.41 GAS TAX 17,307.23 LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND 60,000.00 TRANSPORTATION SB-325 84,588.80 STREET ASSESSMENT 41.00 TRAFFIC SAFETY 6,672.88 MISCELLANEOUS Assessment District #4 4,580 .38 Bails/Bonds 750 .00 CDBG 750.00 Narcotics Officer 9,867. 86 School Resource Officer 1,662. 44 • Sale Maps/Publications/Reports 254. 70 Special Police Services 105.00 Fines & Penalties 1,304.40 Planning Permit Deposits 20,164. 88 Life Support Equipment 1,000.00 Business Improvement Assn. Fee 282.50 Overages & Shortages . 85 P.O.S.T. Reimbursement 5,362. 43 Reimburse to Expense 1,674. 15 Performance Bond 1,800.00 Rents/Concessions 500.00 Refunds 2,648 .70 Sanitation Reimbursement 45,873.71 Weed Abatement 76 .26 Rebates 15.77 Contribution-W/C JPA Fund 26,757.00 Miscellaneous 2, 771.09 Appeals 100 .00 TOTAL 701, 656.28 1 CITY OF ATASCADERO TREASURER'S REPORT • MARCH 1, 1987 TO MARCH 31, 1987 INVESTMENTS LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND $3 ,336 , 000.00 TOTAL INVESTMENT DEPOSITS $3 ,336 ,000 .00 • Davi G4rlces Jgen en Admin. Director 2 • April 28 , 1987 To All Council Members: The breakdown detail on all accounts is available for your viewing in the Finance Department. 4-David- o gensen Admi S rvices Director I 3 A.M-I!, `1 fT�:4t 1918 �F �� A 1979 P R O C L A M A T I O N "CLEAN AIR WEEK" April 27 - May 3, 1987 WHEREAS, air pollution may be harmful to the public health by causing difficulty in breathing, by attacking the body' s defenses, by leaving a person more susceptible to disease, and by contributing to the development of chronic lung disease; and WHEREAS, clean indoor air is vital to the health of all, especially children, older adults, and persons with respiratory diseases and allergies; and • WHEREAS, it is for the public benefit to support the organ- izations and agencies that are concerned with clean indoor and outdoor air, and to become involved in the promotion of efficient pollution controls on mobile and stationary sources; and WHEREAS, this Council supports the conservation of energy while encouraging the planning of public transportation and land use that will result in air quality conservation. THEREFORE, I Marjorie R. Mackey, join with the American Lung Association in urging public support of programs which foster cleaner air, and hereby proclaims the week of April 27 May 3, 1987 as "CLEAN AIR WEEK" . " ► MARJORIE R. MACKEY ICA 24, Mayor April 28, 1987 ME G2AG:MDA DA EIfN1 • MEMORANDUM TO: City Council � THROUGH: Mike Shelton , City Manager FROM: Paul Sensibaugh , Director of Public Works SUBJECT : Authorization to Bid - Transit Bus DATE: April 20, 1987 Recommendation : It is recommended that Council authorize staff to prepare specifications and advertise for bids for the purchase of a new bus for the Dial-A-Ride Transportation System. • Background: At the City Council meeting on September 23, 1985 , Council authorized staff to make application for the purchase of two replacement buses , one bus to be funded out of Section 18 funds and the other out of State Discretionary Funds , both administered by the San Luis Obispo Area Coordinating Council and Regional Transportation Planning Agency in conjunction with the State Department of Transportation , The City took delivery on the first bus early this month and have received authorization from the State to purchase the second bus at this time . Fiscal Impact : The grant received for this bus is funded on a matching fund basis . The total cost of the bus is approximately $40, 000 with the City share being approximately $8, 000, which is appropriated in the depreciation fund for Dial-A-Ride . MEMORANDUM TO: City Council THROUGH: Mike Shelton, City Manager FROM: Paul Sensibaugh, Director of Public Works SUBJECT Proposal for Acoustical Consulting Services DATE: April 22 , 1987 Recommendation : Staff recommends that Council accept the proposal from Bruce Walker including the final testing and adjustment of the sound system and authori ---t-he City Manager to enter into a contract not to exce "" 2500 Background: At the p"ebruary_23rd Council meeting Council authorized the City Manager to obtain a request for proposals from acoustic specialist , Bruce Walker , the engineer that performed the acoustical study of the 4th floor rotunda . Discussion : Attached is a copy of the proposal for the design of the sound system and the acoustical materials and their placement . The proposal also includes the performance of final testing and adjustment of the sound system. This additional work is considered an important phase of the contract and could give the staff a hands-on look at trouble shooting the equipment . Fiscal Impact ; The proposal is on an hourly basis of $65 plus materials with all items except construction supervision not to exceed $2500 . The original estimate on August 21 , 1986 for items 1 thru 4 was $1750 maximum. The 1986-87 budget appropriated $26,000 for such work including design . • 0AEETNG AG7NDA . ATE /3 PTUA �--� MEMORANDUM • TO: City Council THROUGH: Mike Shelton, City Manager FROM: Paul Sensibaugh, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Accoustical and Sound System Improvements of Council Chambers DATE: February 13, 1987 Recommendation: The Rotunda Committee appointed by Council recommends that certain accoustical and sound system improvements be made to the 4th floor Rotunda and to authorize the City Manager to enter into an agreement with Bruce Walker, a specialized consultant in acoustics, to design the above improvements, all within the cur- rent 1986-87 budget. Rk .Nc 4-1752> � if/--6o-C!?5-0 Background: The Rotunda Committee which consists of Mayor Mackey, Councilman Handshy, the City Manager and the Director of Public Works, met again on both February 2 and February 12 to discuss the acoustics in the 4th Floor Rotunda and the future use of that room. (See attached reports) Discussion: It was decided that the room could lend itself to both a meeting chamber and a ballroom and that the improvements noted below would be beneficial regardless of the future final location of the Council Chambers. It is not the intent of this report to consider the use of the space for rental parties, etc. That topic will be brought back as a seperate issue at a later date with a complete evalua- tion, including rules and regulations and rental rates. It is the intent of this report to emphasize a need to move ahead on the acoustic and sound system improvements based on the theory of a potential joint usage of the premises. The following work will be requested none of which will require formal competative bidding procedures or budget adjust- ments. Conceptual approval is requested. . r Carpeting to Perimeter (15 Ft. Radius Circle left open) $ 2,000 Sound Absorbant Treatment to Walls 9,250 _ New Sound System (Long Term) Including design Ct�e-st Viso /7s`�, 13,500 Lighting Improvements 1,300 Fiscal Impact: The cost is estimated at Approximately $26,000 which is within the current budget parameters. � a� 4 _ COUNCIL CHAMBERS MEETING cfem February 2, 1987 PRESENT: Marjorie Mackey Mike Shelton Don Leib RECOMMENDED ALTERNATIVE Formal Meeting Room (Council Chambers etc. )/Ball Room Carpeting on Perimeter (estimate) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$ 2,000 Sound Absorbant Treatment to Walls. . . . . . . . . . . . .* . .$ 9,250 New Sound System (Long Term) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .$13,500 Lighting Improvements (estimate) . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .$ 1,300 TOTAL ALTERNATIVE ADVANTAGE Maximize use of facility - Making it available to the public as f well as for City uses (multi-purpose use) Room acoustics enhanced for all functions Enhanced aesthetics for all functions Can be accomplished in a relatively short period of time within budget OTHER ALTERNATIVES Police Facility - Build in Council Chambers Use Prather Building (on a second priority basis) Fourth Floor Rotunda - Council Chambers Only - Fixed Seating DIRECTION FOR NEXT MEETING Don Leib - To research private and public community center use policies. Mike Shelton - Research availability of Prather Building Investigate rumor of local court room being constructed at the old hospital site • • RESCHEDULE COMMITTEE MEETING Full committee consideration with goal to make recommendations at the February 23,1987 Council Meeting. MS:kv File: MRotunda t ,..s:r r. s u1. of • s MEMORANDUM To: Committee for Council Chambers Renovation From: Paul M. Sensibaugh, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Subject: Useage and Acoustical Improvements of Council Chambers Date: January 21, 1987 Backround: The Committee was formed by Council to study the proper permanent housing for the Council Chambers and to recommend acoustical related alterations for the chambers and sound system. The committee last met in August of 1986 but did not come to a conclusion on the useage of the rotundae. The monies for the sound system and any renovations . were appropiated for this year's budget but until now cash flow in the development tax funds prohibited the iniation of any projects. Recently there has been a repeated demand from the council meeting audiences to improve the acoustics of the 4th floor rotunda and the sound system. The acoustical study that the committee reviewed previously is attached hereto for your information. Other issues previously addressed by this committee included area and capacity, assessability (including handicapped access) , fire escape, compatability with ,point uses, restoration, historic . preservation, image, visual aids coordination, and cost. Discussion: The 4th floor has now been made earthquake resistant which will enhance the comfort level of occupation by small crowds. Remodeling to provide improved acoustical qualities will cause insignificant loss of historic characteristics now existing in that rotunda, as compared to the 1st floor rotunda which is highly susceptable to such impact. Permanent cushioned seating was obtained from the County several years ago and can be utilized for permanent seating if desired. The Fire Marshall has determined that the maximum occupation of the 4th floor rotunda is 235 for both portable and permanent seating. The sound system itself has been piece-mealed together over the years and is not providing adequate balance to the sound demands. The shape and material of the present chambers is not conducive to proper acoustics. Several options are discussed in the acoustical report and others have been suggested by staff for the qth floor room: Sound Absorptive Treatment- Approximately 750 sq .ft . of fiberglass board over 2x2 furring strips covered with an open weave fabric can be added above and below the balcony . Sound System-Short Term- A tamperprooF unit plus a 1/3-octave equalizer can provide temporary help to the poor existing system but would be lost when a long term permanent system is installed. Sound System-Long Term- For a portable seating arrangement an automatic, voice-activated microphone mixer system with a wide-band loudspeaker system designed for the shape and acoustical characteristics of the room could be located behind and above the council podium. Sound System-Long Term- For a permanent seating arrangement the above mixer system could be utilized with speakers mounted in front of the council desk and distributed among the backs of the fixed seats. This arrangement would reduce the need for sound absorbing treatment by 30 to 40: Carpet can enhance sound distractions such as shuffling of feet, movement of chairs, etc. but is not considered a good solution without the above considerations. Experimentation has been considered with the repositioning of the audiance podium, necktie microphones, lighting aids that don 't block the faces of councilmembers, and general instructions to those speaking. The Following is a cost comparison of several acoustical and room useage alternatives for review: , 1 COUNCIL CHAMBERS ACCOUSTICAL AND USEAGE ALTERNATIVES * SOUND- * COUNCIL CHAMBERS ONLY I JOINT BALLROOM-COUNCIL * ACCOUSTICAL *+ **+K* + **+ *+ **+w*+ + ***+ + *+ * +r*** **+�** +w ***�► *+� *** **+sa * OPTIONS * ALT A ALT B ALT C i ALT D ALT E ALT F *SOUND SYSTEM-SHORT TERM* ; +r * -tamperproof unit plus* $1 ,000 1 $1,000 +� * 1/3-octave equalizer * I *. • . . . . . . • • . • . • • .. • . . . . • .*. . . • • . • . • . . • ... . . • • . • . . . • . • . • *SOUND SYSTEM-LONG TERM * �'� ' 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . * -auto,voice-activated * $13,500 1 $13,500✓. * mic,wide band speaker * 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *SOUND •SYSTEM-LONG •TERM * I .* * -seat-mounted speakers* $15,500 1 .$16,000 * mic/speaker matrixing * 1 * *. . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .-1**i►*+1*+Ic+l+l+lF+l►+1**+Ic+lc+lF*ilc**+Mak . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . * ACCOUSTICAL * I * WORK I * . . . . . . *SOUND ABSORPTIVE TREAT * " 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . .* * MENT-fiberglass board * $9,250 $9,250 $6, 000 1 $9,250 $9,250 • $9, 250 * open weave covering . * 1 * * . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .*. . * *CARPET-full floor * $6,000. • $6,000. . •56,0001 . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . * * -to collumns * $4,000 $4 000 s'4,000 1 $4,500 $Lt,500 $4,500 * * -15 ft. radius * $1 ,500 $1 ,500' $1 ,500 1 $1 ,500 $11500 $1 ,500 * * . . . . .'" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *PERMANENT SEATING- * I * county upholstered * $1 ,200 $1 ,200 $1,200 1 +s * new cushioned * $'t, 000 $4,000 $4,000 1 * . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *PORTABLE SEATING-�C,w �y* �o( � • i $0 $0 $0.* * existing metal e Pcrtx��2 1 $3,000 $3, 000 $3,000 * new upholstered * 1 $2,500 $2,500. $2,500 * ALTERNATIVE MIN * $12,950 $25,450 $24,200 * $11 , 750 $2'4,250 $26, 750 * TOTAL COSTS MAX * $20,250 $32, 750 $31 , 500 * $17, 750 $30, 250 $32,750 • • Except p for the assumed undesirable short term solutions (A1t.A and A1t.B) the costs shown range from $24,200 to $32,750 with the differences in useage affecting the costs by only $1000 to $2000. This data is not in itself substantial to argue for or against a council-only or ,point use facility . Other factors should be discussed for a full analysis of the problem. Below is a list of some of the pros and cons of each senario: ADUANTAGES DISADUANTAGES COUNCIL ONLY Ca)No set up or removal of (a)No parties. seating. (b)No additional rev (b)No messes to clean up enues. from parties. (c)Public criticism. (c)No fees to handle for (d) use of facilities. (e) (d)Less damage to facilities. (f) (e)Fewer liability problems. (g) (f)Public support. (h) (g) (h) JOINT USE (a)Functions during idle (a)City hall messes. times. (b)Access to other �. (b)Revenue generator. areas of building (C)Public support. (c)Increase liability . (d) (d)Cost of security (e) _ guards. (f) _ _ (e)Cost of set up and (g) cleaning. (h) (f)Cost of insurance. (g)Public criticism. (h) Many of the considerations are intangibles such as public sentiment and appropiate involvement of government in social or non- recreational events. No attempt is made here to measure these items. It should be noted here that the Pavilion Renovation has been budgeted in connection. with a volunteer contribution from the Pavilion Renovation Committee. The outcome of the future ,use of this building may have a direct affect on the projected use of the 4th floor rotunda . Fiscal Impact: Costs other than those already discussed are shown for a longer term view of rotunda-related improvements . A total of $26, 600 was appropiated in the current fiscal year budget for room renovations and council chamber improvements . Additionally , there could be significant renovations made with the present Historic Preservation j Grant once the HVAC work is completed . The Development Impact Fee should produce about $28,000 per year for future renovations discussed below. Upgrade Elevator Replace Controls $ 30,000 Replace Elevator w/Hydraulic 65,000 Install 2nd Elevator 70,000 Two New Side-by-Side 150,000 Restore Kitchen 2,000 Painting L1,000 Hang F1ags,Historic Decorations 0 Total Minimum Cost (Present 8 Future) $ 47,750 Total Maximum Cost t ) 188,750 BRUCE WALKER (805) a - ( ) 971902 W7conluftZng anal GRE1Q Ea%a4 in TC0u1ticj 2659 TOWNSGATE ROAD • SUITE 101 WESTLAKE VILLAGE, CALIFORNIA 91361 PRELIMINARY ACOUSTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS ti:O R CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS RELOCAT!ON June 6, 1936 Prepared For City of Atascadero Public Works Department P• 0- BOY 747 A tascadero, CA 93423 INTRODUCTION The City of Atascadero is considering the possibility of relocating the City Council Chambers from the fourth floor rotunda to the first floor rotunda, currently occupied by the Historical Museum. The Public Works Department has requested that the acoustical characteristics of the first floor rotunda be reviewed, and that a preliminary assessment be made of its suitability for use as Council Chambers. Due to the historical significance of the building, and this room in particular, any modifications or alterations for acoustic purposes must be accomplished within the existing architectural character of the room. DEFINITIONS M i. Decibel (dB) - A unit division on a logarithmic scale whose base is the tenth root of ten, used to represent ratios of quantities proportional to power. 2. Sound Pressure Level (SPL) - The ratio, expressed in decibels, of the mean-squared sound pressure to the square of the reference pressure, 20 yPa. 3. Reverberation Time (RTso or Tho ) - The time after cessation of excitation. in seconds, for sound in an enclosed space to decay from an initial level to a level 60 dB lower. t r • • ACOUSTIC MEASUREMENTS A series of reverberation and sound distribution _measurements was conducted in the first and fourth floor rotundas. The reverberation measurements were taken to determine the amount of sound absorbing surface or other treatments that would be required to allow reasonable speech intelligibility. The distribution tests were made to assess the affects of the domed ceiling on possible focusing of sound in the rooms. With the spaces essentially unoccupied (save formyself and one or two observers) , reverberation times were as shown Figure 1. Mid-frequency times (which are responsible in large part for the subjective "character" of the space) were approximately 3. 5 seconds in the first floor rotunda and just over 2 seconds in the fourth floor rotunda (which has acoustic tile covering on the dome) . The distribution measurements indicated that levels near the center of the floor are 2 to 4 dB higher than those near the sides and rear, for steady state excitation from a source located at or at the potential location of the center of the council desk. The effect was slightly more pronounced in the first floor rotunda, where the dome is hard plaster. These non-uniformities of level are not large, but may become more exaggerated in the first floor rotunda if the reverberation time is reduced substantially. Acoustic focusing by the domes is not as strong as could be expected for two reasons : First. the surface of the lower dome is broken up with a cast-in pattern and the surface o4f the upper dome is rendered partially acoustically absorptive by covering with acoustic tile. Second. the centers of curvature of both domes are at least 15 ft. above the floor, so that true focusing is not possible. In the case of the lower dome. the . i • large chandelier is located near the center of curvature of the dome, and helps to scatter sound out of a focusing condition. CALCULATIONS Based on dimensional sketches provided by Mr. Crouch of the City. approximate room volumes and total surface areas were calculated for the two spaces. These were then used to determine the amount of sound absorption which would have to be added to each space to reduce reverberation times from the measured values to a desired time (based on speech intelligibility considerations) of approximately 1 second. The computations were based on a full occupancy condition of 200 persons, which themselves add approximately 4 square feet of sound absorbing area each. For the first floor- rotunda. the result of the calculations indicates that 1 , 500 square feet of 8s% efficient sound absorbing treatment would be needed to provide the desired 1 second reverberation time. The fourth floor rotunda is somewhat larger than that on the first floor, and thus can stand to have a slightly higher reverberation time for adequate speech intelligibility. Further, the existing absorption is considerably greater due the the acoustic tile on the dome. With full occupancy, approximately 800 square feet of added absorption will be desired. Again, in both spaces, calculations of required absorption have been based on full occupancy. A strongly recommended measure would be to use upholstered seating for . the audience areas. This will reduce significantly the dependence of the acoustical characteristics of the spaces upon the occupancy level . TREATMENT RECOMMENDATION AND ARCHITECTURAL CONSIDERATIONS The only locations available for application of this treatment, within the historical /architectural constraints. Is to the vertical wall surfaces between the columns. Based on the dimensional sketches, there are approximately 126 running feet of such wall surface in the room (four 15 ft. wide spaces and 11 , 6 ft. wide spaces (twelfth covered with projection booth) . The 15 ft. wide spaces have a recessed area above a set of double doors, with surface area totalling approximately 200 square ft. Filling each recess with sound absorbing treatment and adding sound absorbing treatment of height 16 ft. in each of the 6 ft. wide spaces would provide the needed total absorption. C ~ A reasonably easily implemented sound absorptive treatment is a total of 2. 5 inches thick and consists of 2x2 furring (actual size 1 . 5" square) with 1 inch thick 6-10 pcf density fiberglass board attached to the surface and a visual covering of open-weave fabric. In this case, a practical compromise might be to use the 2x2 (or even 2"x3 on edge) , furring for the treatment in the recesses above the double doors and then apply the treatment in the 6 ft. wide spaces directly over the existing wall surface or on 1x2 furring laid flat. The key to preserving the architectural character of the space would be to select a very plain, off-white fabric for covering the treatment. and to move the existing wood trim out to the surface of the acoustic treatment. Matching trim could be added to the edges of the treatment. If it is desired to improve the acoustics of the existing Council Chambers instead, it is recommended that a S. ft. high strip of sound absorbing treatment be added to the wall surfaces below the second level balcony, and that a 3 ft. high strip of sound absorbing treatment be added to the wall surfaces above the balcony. SOUND REINFORCEMENT The existing sound reinforcement system appears to have "grown" as dictated by increasing functional requirements and availability of funds. In spite of this, the system works fairly well , considering the far-from-ideal acoustical environment. In the short term, I would recommend replacing the "home hi-fi" type power amplifier with a more tamper- proof unit and adding a 1/3-octave equalizer, which will suppress some of the early feedback modes and allow considerably more gain from the system. In the long term, consider changing to an automatic voice-activated microphone mixer system which adjusts overall system gain based on the number of "open" microphone channels. This allows a substantial improvement in the overall system performance. The big-expense item for the sound system would be a wide-band loudspeaker system which is designed specifically around the shape and acoustical characteristics of the space. Preferred location of a central type system would be high Y g on the wall behind the council desk. In the first floor rotunda. this would necessitate an architectural appendage, but it could be made much less obtrusive than the current projection booth. A preferred arrangement, which would be applicable if fixed seating were used, would be seat-back mounted distributed Ioudspeakers. This would make the system less sensitive to reverberation, and would reduce the total requirement for sound absorbing treatments by 30-40%. In this case, the council desk would be fitted with loudspeakers, mounted on a raised panel , and a microphone/speaker matrixing system would be used to prevent feedback. SUMMARY The first floor rotunda could be used as a Council Chambers, but would require addition of a large amount of sound absorbing treatment to eliminate excessive reverberation. Sound absorbing treatment should be added to the fourth floor rotunda to improve the acoustical environment for its continued use as Council Chambers. A step-wise modification of the sound reinforcement system, including a new amplifier, an equalizer, automatic microphone mixer and more sophisticated loudspeaker system would improve speech intelligibility and reduce operational . problems. Respectfully submitted. B � -� ruce Walk�er. Ph. D. Member. INCE 10 BRUCE WRLKER — CONSULTING RND RESEARCH IN RCOUSTICS 9 8 7 A Z 0 U W Ln 6 1 W F r-� t- 5 Z � • W 4 to tY W > W Q 3 S I 1 � t 0 31 . 5 63 125 250 500 1K 2K 4K 8K 16K FREQUENCY - HZ FIRST FLOOR ROTUNDA . - FOURTH FLOOR ROTUNDA FIGURE 1 - MEASURED REVERBERATION TIMES CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made this day of 19 , by and between the CITY OF ATASCADERO, hereinafter referred to as "City", and Bruce Walker hereinafter referred to as "Consultant". Witnesseth For and in _ consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows: Article 1 Authorization A. Consultant will perform this Agreement in conjunction with the Purchase Order issued by the Department of Public Works [City Department] . b. The following exhibits are attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as though here fully set forth. Exhibit "A" - Scope of Services Exhibit "B" - Payment Schedule Exhibit "C" - Subconsultant List 3/12/87 1 Cc: CMgr Article 2 Responsibilities of Consultant A. Scope. Consultant will provide the following acoustical consulting services as described herein and under Exhibit "A" for the City project hereinafter described: Acoustical consulting services for the upgrading of the Atascadero City Council Chambers room acoustics and sound reinforcement system. . „ x Project No. x Y. B. Coordination. In the performance of Consul- tant's service under this Agreement, Consultant agrees that he will maintain such coordination with City officials as may be requested and desirable, including primary coordination with the Project Coordinator, herein designated as the Director of Public Works , and also with the following City officials: C. Consultant's Services. Insofar as they may be applicable to the project contemplated by this Agreement, Consultant shall render the services and furnish the work tasks as described in Exhibit "A", commencing with receipt of a written Notice to Proceed signed by the Project Coordinator and by the City Manager. Article 3 Responsibilities of Citv - - City shall cooperate with Consultant on all phases of the work covered by this Agreement and will make available , to him, as his needs indicate, all existing maps, topographic maps, aerial photographs, soils reports, and other similar data in possession of City covering the site as selected. City shall also be responsible for providing such staff production assistance as is specified in Exhibit "A". Article 4 Fee and Provision for Payment a City will pay Consultant a fee not to exceed $ 2.500.00 for work contracted in this Agreement and billed for based on the payment schedule in Exhibit "B". Consultant shall be paid no later than thirty (30) days following receipt by City of Consultant's progress report and invoice. Any . additional applicable hourly rate billings as authorized in Article 5 shall be based on the Fee Schedule contained in Exhibit Article 5 Payment for Extra Work or Changes Any claim for payment for extra work or changes in the work will be paid by City only upon certification by the City Manager that the claimed extra work or change was authorized in advance by the Project Coordinator and the City Manager, and that the work has been satisfactorily completed. - Claims for such extra work must be submitted by Consultant within thirty (30) days of completion of such work and must be accompanied by a statement of itemized costs covering said work. Article 6 Suspension or Termination of Agreement A. Suspension of Agreement. If Consultant fails to comply with the conditions of the Agreement, City may, by Y y written notice of the. Project Coordinator and the City t Manager, suspend the Agreement and withhold further payments pending corrective action by Consultant or a decision to terminate the Agreement. After receipt of notice of suspension, Consultant may not incur additional obligations of Agreement funds during the suspension unless specifically authorized by the Project Coordinator and the City Manager. B. Termination for Convenience. Either party hereto shall have the right to terminate this Agreement upon giving ten (10) days written notice of such termination to the other party. In the event of the termination of this project in its entirety, notwithstanding any other fee provisions of this Agreement, based upon work accomplished by Consultant prior to notice of such termination, City shall determine the amount of fee to be paid to Consultant for his services based upon the provisions in Exhibit "B", and such findings of City shall be final and conclusive as to the amount of such fee. In the event of termination of any portion of this project, Consultant shall be entitled to the reasonable value of his . services involved in the termination, as determined by City, upon a finding which shall be final and conclusive as to the amount of fee due and owing. Article 7 Time of Completion Consultant agrees to diligently pursue his work under this Agreement and to complete the work as described in Exhibit "A" in accordance with the standards of the profession within t '-% ,.r y ( 'jU ) calendar days of receipt of the Notice to Proceed. Consultant shall not be responsible for any delay which is caused by City review, action or inaction of City and/or any state or federal agency, or acts of God, but shall be responsible for his own fault or negli- gence or that of any of his subcontractors. If the work is not completed by Consultant in the time specified for each item, or within any period of exten- sion authorized in writing by the Project Coordinator, it is understood that City will suffer damages and Consultant will pay to City, as fixed and liquidated damages (not as a penalty) , the sum of $ for each calendar day of the delay until the work is completed and accepted. Consultant is liable for the amount thereof, and City may deduct said sums from any money due or that may become due to Consultant. Article 8 Conflicts of Interest i No member, officer, or employee of City, during his or her tenure, or for one (1) year thereafter, shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement or the proceeds thereof. Article 9 Ownership of Data The ownership of all data collected for use by Consultant under this Agreement, together with working papers, drawings, and other materials necessary for a complete under- standing of the plans and necessary for the practical use of the plans shall be vested in City. Ownership of original drawings and documents shall be vested in City. Consultant may retain a copy of all work for his own use. Article 10 Covenant Against Contingent Fees Consultant warrants that he has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide 0 employee working solely for him, to solicit or secure this Agreement, and that he has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for him, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or any other consideration contingent on or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the _ u right to annul this Agreement without liability or, in its discretion, to deduct from the contract price or consideration or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage fee, gift, or contingency. Article 11 Contract Personnel The work to be done pursuant to this Agreement shall be done by _�,� <..e, LJ a} ,�. �� D V'1 t)C C , 1 r�e�, •- b "=3---Net - , and such other personnel in the employ or under the supervision of Consultant who shall be approved by City. The City official who shall be vested with the right of approval of such additional personnel or outside contracting parties shall be the City Manager. City reserves the right to reject any of Consultant's personnel or proposed outside consultants, and City reserves the right to request that acceptable replacement personnel be assigned to the project. Consultant shall provide a list (Exhibit "C") of all other consultants or outside contracting parties. Article 12 Indemnity Clause Consultant shall defend, indemnify, and save harm- less the City of Atascadero, its officers, agents, and employees, from any and all claims, demands, damages, costs, expenses, and liabilities arising out of this Agreement or occasioned by the negligent performance or attempted negligent performance of the provisions hereof, including, but not limited to, any negligent act or omission to act on the part of Consultant or his agents or employees or independent contractors directly responsible to him, except that the above shall not apply to the sole negligence or willful misconduct Of City or City's agents, servants, or independent contractors who are directly responsible to City. This indemnification provision shall apply even if there is concurrent or joint negligence of indemnitor and indemnitee, and even if there is active or passive negligence by either or both parties. Article 13 Automobile _ and Public Liability Insurance. Consultant shall also maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Agreement, automobile insurance and- public liability insurance with an insurance carrier satisfac- tory to City, which insurance shall include protection against claims arising from personal injury, including death resulting therefrom, and damage to propertyresultingfrom any actual occurrence arising out of the performance of this Agreement. The amounts of insurance shall be not less than the following: Single limit coverage applying to bodily and personal injury, including death resulting therefrom, and property damage or a combination thereof in an amount not less than $ 300,000 . The following endorsements must be attached to the policy or policies: (1) If the insurance policy covers on an "accident" basis, it must be changed to "occurrence". (2) The policy must cover personal injury as well as bodily injury. (3) Broad form property damage liability must be afforded. (4) The City of Atascadero, its officers, employees, and agents, shall be named as insureds under the Policy, and the policy shall stipulate that the insurance will operate as primary insurance and that no other insurance effected by City will be called upon to contribute to a loss hereunder. (5) The policy shall contain contractual liability either on a blanket basis or by identifying this Agreement within a contractual liability endorsement. (6) The policy shall contain "cross-liability" such that each insured is covered as if separate policies had been issued to each insured. (7) City shall be given thirty (30) days notice' prior to cancellation or reduction in coverage of the insurance. Article 14 Status Consultant shall, during the entire term of this Agreement, be construed to be an independent contractor, and in no event shall any of his personnel or subcontractors be construed to be employees of City. Article 15 Non-Discrimination Consultant shall comply with the provisions of Presidential Executive Order No. 11246 of September 24, 1965, and all other orders, regulations, and laws governing non- discrimination in employment, including in particular, Section 122 (a) of the State and Local Fiscal Assistance Act of 1972. Article 16 Modification of Agreement This Agreement may be modified only by a written amendment signed by both parties hereto. Article 17 • Law Governing This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Article 18 Communications Communications between the parties to this Agreement may be sent to the following addresses: City: CITY OF ATASCADERO 6500 Palma Avenue P.O. Box 747 ' Atascadero, CA 93423 Attn: City Manager Consultant: M F MA 7 R✓ 1 1�7 Cr I ACCEPTED AND AGREED this 26 day of o v- 19K7. CITY: CONSULTANT: CITY OF ATASCADERO, a municipal corporation By By Mayor ATTEST: • City Clerk APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Project Coordinator City Attorney JGJ: fr/2/24/87 C:AGATA339 7 BRUCE WALKER (805) 497-1902 W70nla ting and G \E 1izatc4 Ln OTco lticl 2659 TOWNSGATE ROAD • SUITE 101 WESTLAKE VILLAGE, CALIFORNIA 91361 March 4 , 1987 Mr. Don Leib City of Atascadero P.O. Box 747 Atascadero, CA 93423 Subject: City Council Chambers - Proposal for Acoustical Consulting Services Dear Mr. Leib: Thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal to provide acoustical consulting services for the upgrading of the Atascadero City Council Chambers room acoustics and sound reinforcement system. I have reviewed my files from the measurements taken and recommendations presented last Year. Based on those findings, I propose the following: 1 . Meet with City .personnel to discuss operational requirements, equipment budget, design and installation schedule, etc. 2 . Design and specify a new loudspeaker system which will provide more uniform coverage of the seating and council desk areas while minimizing excitation of the rever- berant sound field. One important consideration will be architectural integration of the system. 3. Review once again the existing electronic equipment (amplifiers , mixers , equalizers, etc. ) and prepare a specification for additional or replacement equipment where it is judged necessary for proper operation of the system. We will maintain a close working relationship with City Personnel in order to make the most efficient use of existing equipment and to preserve operational priorities . 4 . Design and specify efficient sound absorbing treatments for applicable room boundaries, so that rever- beration can be more nearly optimized. Again, architectural integration will be an important consideration. Mr. Don Leib Page 2 March 4 , 1987 5. Provide ongoing assistance and supervision as required for installation of both the sound reinforcement -equipment and the acoustic treatments . 6. Perform final testing and adjustment of the system. This will include equalizer settings for feedback sup- pression and loudspeaker adjustment for optimal uniformity of coverage. We propose to provide the above services on a time and materials basis at a standard rate of $65 per hour. The "not-to-exceed" cost for items 1-4 and 6 will be $2, 500 . 00 . Item 5 would be charged on a straight time and expenses basis . Travel time is charged at $25 per hour. We are prepared to meet any reasonable schedule for completion of this work, and are prepared to begin within two weeks of authorization to proceed. Please let me know if you have any questions or require additional information regarding this proposal . I ' ll look forward to working with you again. Sincerely yours, �tJ= Bruce Walker, Ph.D. Member, INCE Exhibit' IIB" Payment Schedule City will pay Consultant a fixed fee equal to $ for work contracted for in this Agreement when completed and accepted by City, based upon the following disbursement and preliminary project schedule. Descri tion Schedule Complete Amount TOTAL $ Hourly fee schedule for extra work: Exhibit "C" Subconsultant List Name (Firm) : Address: Telephone: Responsible Individual: Project Responsibility: Name (Firm) : Address: Telephone: Responsible Individual: Project Responsibility: Name (Firm) : Address: Telephone: Responsible Individual: Project Responsibility: /VJ • M E M O RAN D U M TO: City Council Members April 28, 1987 FROM: Michael Shelton, City Manager SUBJECT: CITY-SCHOOL FUEL SHARING PROGRAM - PROPOSED MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING RECOMMENDATION: City Council authorize the City Manager to enter into a Memo- randum of Understanding with the Atascadero Unified School District to enable the City to utilize School District gasoline facilities. BACKGROUND: Since incorporation, the City has not had its own fuel tanks, necessitating the City to purchase fuel at various service is stations at commercial pump prices. It is estimated that the cost to install a fuel system (tank and pump) of our own would be approximately $100,000. (New regu- lations on underground tanks is the reason for the high cost. ) Accordingly, the City has been exploring other options that could reduce fuel costs in a cost-effective manner. The City and School District have discussed in depth the joint use of current School District pumps necessitating the City and School District jointly purchasing new fuel pumps that provide computer account- ing of fuel usage by City and School District vehicles. To do - this, the City' s cost was estimated to be $50,000. The proposed agreement makes available to the City extensive use of a pump and tank, therefore requiring no capital acquisition on the City' s part. Terms of Agreement: The School District: * Will supply a 10 ,000 gallon tank and a new pump on their site for the exclusive use by the City for unleaded gasoline. * Will issue keys to the City for the gates to the yard. * Will provide oil at City request. * Will bill the City for the actual cost of fuel loaded into the tank, including appropriate taxes, plus 1-1/2 cents per gallon for electrical and administrative costs. * Will. provide diesel fuel out of their tanks through logging on their forms. * Will bill for diesel and will be on an out-of-pump measure- ment and at School District cost, including appropriate taxes, plus 1-1/2 cents per gallon. *_ Will start the unleaded with a full tank. The City: * Will use only the tank (s) designated by the School District. * Will provide its own internal recordation. * Will provide its own keys for pump (s) . * May provide its own oil. * Will pay the costs stated above. * Will leave the tank filled if agreement is terminated. FISCAL IMPACT: The City uses approximately 51, 300 gallons of unleaded fuel per year. Based on a cost analysis performed by the Public Works Department, the City will save a minimum of 16 cents per gallon less a 1-1/2 cent administrative charge for a net savings of 14-1/2 cents per gallon. An annual savings is thereby estimated at $7,250. An analysis made at another time period, comparing School acquisition cost versus City credit card cost revealed an annual cost savings to be as high as $17, 500 per year. As a comparison, a bid to another commercial service station was acquired, and bulk fuel from the School District appears to pro- vide a substantial additional savings. The Memorandum of Understanding, entered into in a spirit of cooperativeness, maximizes the taxpayers dollars and mutually benefits both public entities. MS:kv File: mfuel cc: Atascadero Unified School District Atascadero Unified School District "Where students and their education are paramount" 6800 LEWIS AVENUE ANTHONY AVINA, Ed.D. ATASCADERO, CA 93422 District Superintendent PHONE: (805) 466-0393 April 9, 1987 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN: The Atascadero Unified School District and The City of Atascadero The Atascadero Unified School District and the City of Atascadero have determined_ that it will be beneficial to enter into an agreement to share facilities for the purchase and disbursement of gasoline for vehicles . THE ATASCADERO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT SHALL: 1 . Provide the City of Atascadero with one 10, 000 gallon gasoline gasoline storage tank and pump for the express use of the City. Y 2 . Shall purchase gasoline in a timely manner, shall require a separate invoice for fuel which is pumped into the City tank and shall bill the City accordingly. 3 . Invoices shall reflect a surcharge of one and one-half ( I '2) cents per gallon to cover the costs of the District . 4 . The pump meter shall be read and the tanks measured no less than three times per week and a reconciliation made at that time . Copies of the reconciliation shall be forwarded to the City in a timely manner. 5 . All necessary reports to the County, State and Environmental Protection Agency shall be made by the District . 6 . Should this agreement terminate, the District shall reimburse the City for the gas in the tank. THE CITY OF ATASCADERO SHALL: 1 . Reimburse the District for the gas in the tank at the inception of this agreement . 2 . Shall provide its own lock for the pump. 3 . Shall provide its own locks to be placed on the chains which secure the gates to the service yard. Carrisa Plains Elementary • Creston Elementary • Lewis Avenue Elementary • Margarita Elementary • Monterey Road Elementary Santa Mar g y Santa Rosa Road Elementary Atascadero Junior High School Atascadero Senior High School • Atascadero Adult School • Oak Hills Continuation High School (MEMORANDUM OF UNSTANDING) page 2 4 . Shall provide its own motor oil , transmission oil and other supplies . The District will supply a secure area, however the City shall supply their own lock. 5 . Upon receipt of billings , the City shall reimburse the District in a timely manner. This agreement is entered into in the spirit of cooperation for the mutual benefit of both public intities and as a method of saving public funds . The agreement can be amended at any time by mutual consent and can be canceled by either party should it cease to be beneficial and upon the giving of reasonable notice. Michael Shelton Ernest W. Taylor City Manager Business Manager City of Atascadero Atascadero Unified School District EWT: rr 0 KENNETH J. LUMAN, INC. KEN'S MOBIL- TIRE KING 6990 EL CAMINO REAL- ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA 93422 - (805) 466.9977 City of Atascader•o P.O. Bax 747 Atascadero, Ca 933423 Dear Mr . Sensibaugh : Thank you for recent inquiry for a bid on gasoline . As I indicated to you on the phone gasoline prices are unstable at this time , as an example there has seven changes resulting in an increase of ten and one half cents per gallon since January 3rd.Thus a quote of an exact price per gallon would not be possible unless it fluctuated with wholesale costs, then I 'm afraid we would be constantly having to ajust . What I would like to do is offer a bid of two cents a gallon on leaded regular (your 1 ton and bigger trucks can still use it ) , four cents on unleaded regular , six cents on super unleaded, six cents on diesel below whatever my posted cash prices are at time of purchase . As I think you already know my prices are always very competitive , so with the added discount and cash prices rather than credit (four cents more > should net a savings of approximately $3,300 .00 yearly. We are centrally located and open twenty four hours a day even all holidays and offer discounted oil for your convience . I deeply appreciate the oppertunity to submit this bid and look forward to hearing from you . Sincerely yours, Kenneth J Luman Ken' s Mobil MEETING . � .^ � AG'7NOA DAT:_ c.''' : plc' ITEM #/7 M E M O R A N D U M TO: City Council April 28, 1987 VIA: Michael Shelton, City Manager FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director � £ SUBJECT: Lot Line Adjustment 3-87 LOCATION: 7055 Llano Road (Lots 15 , 16, 17B, Block 56) • APPLICANT: Philip Wood (Cuesta Engineering) ' REQUEST: To adjust the property line between three existing lots of record. On April 7, 1987, the Atascadero Planning Commission considered the Above-referenced matter on its consent calendar, unanimously approv- ing the lot line request subject to the findings and conditions con- tained in the attached staff report. There was no discussion or public testimony on this item. RECOMMENDATION: Approval per Planning Commission' s recommendation. cc: Philip Wood Cuesta Engineering City of Atascadero Item: A,2 . STAFF REPORT FOR: Planning Commission Meeting Date: April 7, 1987 BY: 4ps teven L. DeCamp, Senior Planner File No: LLA 3-87 Project Address: 7055 Llano Road (Lots 15,16 & 17B; Blk 56; AC) SUBJECT: Request to adjust the property line between three (3) existing lots of record. A. SITUATION AND FACTS: 1. Applicant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Philip Wood 2. Representative. , . . . . . . . . . . . . .Cuesta Engineering 3. Site Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Parcel l - 4.95/4.70 acres Parcel 2 - 1. 05/3. 76 acres Parcel 3 - 7,67/4.70 acres 4. Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .RS (Residential Suburban - 2. 5 • to 10.0 acre minimum lot size) 5. Existing Use. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Parcels 1 and 3 - vacant • Parcel 2 - existing sheds 6. Adjacent Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . .North: RS South: RS East: RS West: RS & L (FH) 7. General Plan Designation. . . . .Suburban Single Family 8. Environmental Status. . . . . . . . .Categorically Exempt (Glass 5) B. ANALYSIS: The subject property is located in the RS (Residential Suburban) zone. Minimum lot size in this zone ranges between 2. 5 and 10 .0 acres depending upon the "score" of the various performance stan- dards. Two of the lots involved in this lot line adjustment are larger than the minimum lot size required by the zone. The third lot is nonconforming because it is smaller than allowed by the zoning. _ • IIS Staff Report - LLA 3-87 7055 Llano Road (Wood/Cuesta) Page Two Analysis - Cont'd For this site, the minimum lot size criteria are: Distance from center (16 ,000 - 18,000) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0. 60 Septic suitability (Moderate) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0.75 Average slope (31 - 35%) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1.75 Condition of access (All Weather) . . . . . . . . . . . .0.75 General neighborhood character (4.26 acres) . . . . . . . . . .0. 85 Minimum Lot Size: 4.70 acres As a result of the lot line adjustment, two (2) of the parcels will be reduced in size to the minimum allowed by the ordinance. The property taken from these two lots will be added to the third. Although this third lot will still be substandard, the resultant lot size of 3. 76 acres will be an improvement over its previous size of 1.5 acres. The proposed map complies with City policies and standards. It is staff' s determination that the proposed lot line adjustment does not present any significant planning issues. C. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Lot Line Adjustment 3-87 based on the Findings in Exhibit C and the Conditions of Approval in Exhibit D. SLD:ph Attachments: Exhibit A - Location and zoning Exhibit B — Tentative Lot Line Adjustment Map Exhibit C - Findings for Approval Exhibit D - Conditions of Approval i R S - �x�lr�►7 A ``� - rS LoGal�o� \ LI-A 3-97 cEBb L R S / 9,0 1; 'il i� 'C 1\\\ ANT, O- / ♦\� l p Z. /11 N �qO, -, ° c 1 019 QQ�F99 ;. ?055 L hAKo fZd• \\ O \ II o�ROPo ° m L( H) RS \\\\ 1 ` IOM/T,S II 11 /:EA b. j S T tSl it 1\ /pit / ( // II 04•` \ I 1 W ?T LLA 3 - 87 a 3 T 'e 8- a. �ti• c L: rd m t v� r Z � ti r•� L. iir.to• 1'.•�ce's' a � � $�oa n S'A4> n1 y`i �noT H tines s v0�� i� a tb 14 V A f- b� Yin Zv ct • 0 EXHIBIT C - Findings for Approval Lot Line Adjustment 3-87 (Wood/Cuesta Engineering) April 7, 1987 FINDINGS: 1. The application as submitted has been determined to be categori- cally exempt from the requirements of the California Environ- mental Quality Act. 2. The application as submitted conforms with all applicable zoning, general plan and subdivision regulations of the City of Atasca- dero. EXHIBIT D - Conditions of Approval Lot Line Adjustment 3-87 (Wood/Cuesta) April 7, 1987 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The lot line adjustment as generally shown on the map attachment provided herein shall be submitted in final map format or re- flected in a record of survey to be approved by the Community De- velopment Department prior to recordation by the County Recorder ' s Office. 2. The proposed adjusted lot lines shall be surveyed and monuments set at the new property corners prior to recordation of the final map or record of survey. 3. If a final map is to be recorded, all existing easements shall be delineated thereon. • 4. Approval of this lot line adjustment shall expire two years from the date of approval unless a time extension has been granted pur- suant to a written request prior to the expiration date. • 6EE ING/ A • M E M O R A N D U M TO: City Council April 28, 1987 VIA: Michael Shelton, City Manager FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director IAI- SUBJECT: Lot Line Adjustment 5-87 LOCATION: 3905 E1 Camino Real (Lots 108 , 109) • APPLICANT: David Zimmer (Volbrecht Surveys) REQUEST: To adjust the property line between two existing lots of record. On April 7, 1987, the Atascadero Planning Commission considered the above-referenced matter on its consent calendar, unanimously approv- ing the lot line request subject to the findings and conditions con- tained in the attached staff report. There was no discussion or public testimony on this item. RECOMMENDATION: Approval per Planning Commission' s recommendation. cc: David Zimmer Volbrecht Surveys • .City of Atascadero Item: A.3 • STAFF REPORT FOR: Planning Commission Meeting Date: April 7 , 1987 BY: AXASteven L. DeCamp, Senior Planner File No: LLA 5-87 Project Address: 3905 E1 Camino Real (Lots 108 & 109 ; Blk 19 ; Atascadero Colony) SUBJECT: Request to adjust the property line between two (2) existing lots of record. A. SITUATION AND FACTS: 1. Applicant. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .David Zimmer 2. Representative. . . . . . . . . . . . . .Volbrecht Surveys 3. Site Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Parcel 1 - 0.72 acres Parcel 2 - 0. 68 acres . 4. Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .CN (Neighborhood Commercial) 5. Existing Use. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Parcel 1 - undeveloped Parcel 2 - commercial building 6. Adjacent Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . .North: RS South: LSF-X/CR East: RS West: CR 7. General Plan Designation. . . .Retail Commercial 8. Environmental Status. . . . . . . .Categorically Exempt (Class 5) B. ANALYSIS: The property which is the subject of this lot line adjustment is located in a CN (Neighborhood Commercial) zoning district. There is no minimum lot size specified for commercial zones in the City' s Zoning Ordinance. Therefore, the size of the lots re- sulting from the lot line adjustment is not an important planning issue. Parcel 2 is developed with a commercial building (All American Video) . A portion of the parking lot for this building encroaches onto Parcel 1, which is otherwise undeveloped. This lot line adjustment would serve to eliminate the encroachment. • �► . Staff Report - Lot Line Adjustment 5-87 (Zimmer/Volbrecht) April 7, 1987 The proposed map, as presented, complies with City policies and standards. It should be noted that there will be no requirement for dedication or other improvements as a result of the proposed lot line adjustment. C. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Lot Line Adjustment 5-87 based on the Findings in Exhibit C and the Conditions of Approval in Exhibit D. SLD:ph Attachments: Exhibit A - Location and Zoning Exhibit B - Tentative Lot Line Adjustment Map Exhibit C - Findings for Approval Exhibit D - Conditions of Approval II�) IIIIII c EX41BIT S Low L ►►,� Ad u�-�h+a.�-F� Ma � P UA 5-8-7 M r � Ny N a� "•YL w NJJ%f• f5J6' N y N 0+iMsoKd 4 N s oNil pl. v Cyd WO d n a a tit Ga EXHIBIT C - Findings for Approval Lot Line Adjustment 5-87 April 7 , 1987 FINDINGS: 1. The application as submitted has been determined to be categor- ically exempt from the requirements of the California Environ- mental Quality Act. 2. The application as submitted conforms with all applicable zoning, general plan and subdivision regulations of the City of Atas- cadero. i 0 0 EXHIBIT D - Conditions of Approval Lot Line Adjustment 5-87 April 7, 1987 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The lot line adjustment as generally shown on the map attachment provided herein shall be submitted in final map format or re- flected in a record of survey to be approved by the Community De- velopment Department prior to recordation by the County Recorder ' s Office. 2. The proposed adjusted lot lines shall be surveyed and monuments set at the new property corners prior to recordation of the final map or record of survey. 3. If a final map is to be recorded, all existing easements shall be delineted thereon. 4. Approval of this lot line adjustment shall expire two years from the date of approval unless a time extension has been granted pur- suant to a written request prior to the expiration date. MEETING SRS g 'ITEM #A O i M E M O. R A N D U M TO: City Council April 28, 1987 VIA: Michael Shelton, City Manager FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Lot Line Adjustment 6-87 LOCATION: 3275/3355 Ramona Road (Ptn. Lot 19E & 20 , Block 18) APPLICANT: Patricia St. Clair (North Coast Engineering) REQUEST: To adjust the property line between two existing lots of record. On April 7, 1987 , the Atascadero Planning Commission considered the above-referenced matter on its consent calendar, unanimously approv- ing the lot line request subject to the findings and conditions con- tained in the attached staff report. There was no discussion or public testimony on this item. RECOISIENDATION: Approval per Planning Commission' s recommendation. cc: Patricia St. Clair North Coast Engineering City of Atascadero Item: A.4 STAFF REPORT FOR: Planning Commission Meeting Date: April 7, 1987 BY 4DSteven L. DeCamp, Senior Planner File No: LLA 6-87 Project Address: 3275/3355 Ramona Road (Ptn. Lot 19E & 20 ; Block 18 ; AC) SUBJECT: Request to adjust the property line between two (2) existing lots of record. A. SITUATION AND FACTS: 1. Applicant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Patricia St. Clair 2. Representative. . . . . . . . . . . . . .North Coast Engineering 3. Site Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Parcel 1 - 1. 59 ac./2.50 ac. Parcel 2 - 2.50 ac./1. 59 ac. 4. Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .RS (Residential Suburban) 5. Existing Use. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Parcel 1 - Single Family Dwellingl Parcel 2 - Vacant 6. Adjacent Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . .North: RS South: RS East: US Hwy. 101/CR West: RS 7. General Plan Designation. . . .Suburban Single Family 8. Environmental Status. . . . . . . .Categorically Exempt (Class 5) B. ANALYSIS: The subject property is located in the RS (Residential Suburban) zone. Minimum lot size in this zone ranges between 2. 5 and 10.0 acres depending upon the "score" of the various performance stan- dards. Both of the lots involved in this lot line adjustment are smaller than the minimum lot size allowed by the zone. The proposed lot line adjustment will be conditioned to result in an equal exchange of land between the two affected lots. The lot line adjustment will result only in a "swap" in the location of the larger of the two parcels. It is staff' s determination that the proposed adjustment does not present any substantial planning• issues. 0 • Staff Report - Lot Line Adjustment 6-87 3275/3355 Ramona Road (St. Clair/North Coast Eng. ) April 7, 1987 Page Two Analysis - Cont'd The proposed map, as conditioned, complies with City policies and standards. C. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Lot Line Adjustment 6-87 based on the Findings in Exhibit C and the Conditions of Approval in Exhibit D. SLD:ph Attachments: Exhibit A - Location and Zoning Exhibit B —Tentative Lot Line Adjustment Map Exhibit C - Findings for Approval Exhibit D - Conditions of Approval ♦ .,e � , I � Il . E X W6 r j B o /� I. a ; N L o'{' LI n!a A 1 U'ST�vt 2 LL,A � O tA o rl O Ao' JY �4 ti 316% 2Awj ��� R n on�mm rN . oy,y -_ °... ao� Z �aan a s :m 0 o a as _rn sy.;...... oov pv° n1 ._.. �l A � 14, n 0 'l �ti�aZ yn p � • • EXHIBIT C - Findings for Approval Lot Line Adjustment 6-87 (St. Clair/NCE) April 7, 1987 FINDINGS: 1. The application as submitted has been determined to be categori- cally exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. 2. The application as submitted conforms with all applicable zoning, general plan and subdivision regulations of the City of Atas- cadero. 0 • EXHIBIT D - Conditions of Approval Lot Line Adjustment 6-87 (St. Clair/NCE) April 7, 1987 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The lot line adjustment as generally shown on the map attachment provided herein shall be submitted in final map format or re- flected in a record of survey to be approved by the Community De- velopment Department prior to recordation by the County Recorder ' s Office. 2. The proposed adjusted lot lines shall be surveyed and monuments set at the new property corners prior to recordation of the final map or record of survey. 3. The proposed lot line adjustment shall be drawn to insure that the resultant lots do not deviate from existing lot sizes. 4. If a final map is to be recorded, all existing easements shall be delineated thereon. 5. Approval of this lot line adjustment shall expire two years from the date of approval unless a time extension has been granted pur- suant to a written request prior to the expiration date. ETING l,GT`1DA TE� ITEM M E M O R A N D U M • TO: City Council April 28, 1987 VIA: Michael Shelton, City Manager h FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director kk'E SUBJECT: Tentative Tract Map 21-86 LOCATION: Northside of Santa Lucia and Lomitas Roads APPLICANT: Glen Millhollin (Robert Tartaglia) REQUEST: To resubdivide six existing residential lots containing 119. 6 acres into 22 lots varying in size from 3. 1 acres to to 26.3 acres. On March 17 , 1987 and April 7, 1987 , the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the above-referenced subject, unanimously approv- ing the land division request (on a 5 :0 vote) subject to the findings and conditions as revised at the March 17th meeting (attached) . There was considerable discussion and public testimony specifically relating to road safety and bridge concerns as reflected in the at- tached minutes excerpts. RECOMMENDATION: Approval of Tentative Tract Map 21-86 subject to the revised findings and conditions of approval. HE:ps ATTACHMENTS: Planning Commission Memo - April 7 , 1987 Planning Commission Staff Report - March 17, 1987 Revised Findings and Conditions of Approval Planning Commission Minutes Excerpt — March 17, 1987 Planning Commission Minutes Excerpt - April 7 , 1987 cc : Glen Millhollin Robert Tartaglia Iters: C.2 M E M O R A N D U M . TO: Planning Commission April 7 , 1987 FROM: Joel Moses, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Tentative Tract Map 21-86 - Millhollin/Tartaglia (Northside of Santa Lucia and Lomitas Roads) At its March 17, 1987 meeting, the Planning Commission held a public hearing concerning TTM 21-86. During the hearing, the Commission heard testimony from the general public regarding off-site improve- ment to the Santa Lucia Road Bridge over Graves Creek. Preliminary investigation by staff on the structure has found the following: 1. The City has no traffic count specifically for the bridge. The closest count the City has is at Santa Lucia Road at Portola Road. Three day traffic counts show an average daily count of 2136 (1986) . These counts should be considered in light of the fact that they are approximately 1 1/4 miles from the bridge. 2. The bridge' s last CalTrans inspction for structural soundness an� design, was done in 1985. Per State law, another inspection i set to be done within the next three (3) months. This inspection could lead to the bridge qualifying for a State Reconstruction Grant within the next year . 3. The intersection is being reviewed for sight distances and design. The intersection will be reviewed by the Traffic Committee for its April 22, 1987 meeting. Paul Sensibaugh will be present at the Planning Commission to answer any further questions. JM:ph Enclosure: Staff Report, dated March 17, 1987 • • • City of Atascadero Item: B.4 STAFF REPORT FOR: Planning Commission Meeting Date: March 17, 1987 BY: Joel Moses, Associate Planner File No: TTM 21-86 Project Address: Northside of Santa Lucia and Lomitas Roads SUBJECT: Tentative Tract Map 21-86 submitted by Glen Millhollin and Robert Tar taglia & Associates to resubdivide six (6) existing residential lots containing 119.6 acres into 22 lots containing 26.3 to 3. 1 acres. BACKGROUND: Notice of public hearing was published in the Atascadero News on Fri- day, March 6 , 1987 . All property owners of record located within 300 feet of the subject property were also notified on that date. A. SITUATION AND FACTS: 1. Applicant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Glen Millhollin 2. Representative. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Robert Tartaglia 3. Site Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .119.6 acres 4. Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .RS (Residential Suburban) 2 1/2 to 10 acre minimum lot size RS (FH) (Residential Suburban with a Flood Hazard Overlay) 5. Existing Use. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Vacant 6. Adjacent Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . .North: RS-Residential Suburban South: RS-Residential Suburban East: RS (FH) -Residential Suburban(Flood Hazard Overlay) West: RS-Residential Suburban 7 . General Plan Designation. . . . .Suburban Single Family 8. Environmental Status. . . . . . . . .Negative Declaration posted • • Staff Report - TTM 21-86 Page Two is B. ANALYSIS: The application before the Commission proposes the subdivision of six (6) parcels containing 119.6 acres into 22 parcels varying in size from 26.3 to 3.1 acres. The property proposed for subdivi- sion is located in a RS (Residential Suburban) zoning district. Minimum lot size in this zone ranges between 2. 5 and 10 .0 acres depending upon the "score" of the various performance standards. Distance from the Center of Community.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .40 Septic Suitability. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 Average Slope. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.00 Access Condition. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .40 General Neighborhood Character. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .79 3.09 The proposed lot size of 3.09 is in conformance with the stan- dard set by the Zoning Ordinance. In reviewing the site for potential impacts, the staff required an Archaeological Site Study. The survey was carried out by Dr. Robert Hoover. Dr. Hoover has noted in a written report that there is no evidence of any archaeological resources on the site. . This does not mean that no archaeological sites are present, but it is believed that none exist on this site. If an archaeological site is discovered, the Zoning Ordinance sections related to Arch- aeological Finds will be implemented. The site also contains a ridge line that peaks along the eastern property line. The ridge is highly visable to the area in and around the Paradise and Long Valley areas. The applicant has rec- ognized this, and has proposed the property line along the ridge to prevent construction along the ridge. Staff has reviewed the possibility of an open space easement along the ridge to assure the area remaining in Open Space. The access and construction along the ridge line would be difficult at best, and adequate building sites exist along the lower areas of the site. The resubdivision does require the movement of a property line that is used for a zone district boundary. Lots 14 to 20 adjust a property line to the west from the existing property line that acts as a boundary for a Flood Hazard Overlay District. The ad- justment has been reviewed by staff and a determination that no zone change is required. The adjustment would be covered by Sec- tion 9-1.109 (c) . The section notes "Where a boundary is shown as approximately following a lot line, the lot line shall be con- sidered to be the boundary" . This would leave lots 21 and 22 with a Flood Hazard Overlay. • • Staff Report - TTM 21-86 Page Three Responses from outside agencies express concern for development of some public facilities; such as roads, fire hydrants and road right-of-ways. The applicant has received a precise plan and im- provement plans approval to construct a private road between Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4. This road will replace the existing private road between Lots 10 and 11. C. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends conditional approval of Tentative Tract Map 23-86 based on the Findings in Exhibit D and Conditions of Approval in Exhibit E. JM:ph Attachments: Exhibit A - Location and Zoning Map Exhibit B - Tentative Tract Map Sec. #1 Exhibit C - Tentative Tract Map Sec. #2 Exhibit D - Findings for Approval Exhibit E - Conditions of Approval {z '31I F .P kit CID 130 a �' I.,.e:• �., '. , Geos � `/o. �\�'Os j` �\ /`'� •C i� �i'-1-� 0p Ph . J���` i:s�e� �o jIII '' � fj YYY►►r.., � %4, `•�t�y �• �i�yoe r ' J ea kk ff ,:rer .♦ fj `.� N +1 _ ycvap t j/zso"`\\ I ? e 1�— ._. :� •, ��1 '•� I�, �; °� '•• �' -`�_-_--�. /jam s� _ .....---_.. ___•_ -- _ � /I •Nor .lis'°�-�I..L_–' , �`_�� _ i ' -�..,_,__T y9� f4/9y� /J ' � ?� -�• + •• V` . S l,tteo•• (I i. , '��.�35p_� 1 ttro 'h�sr' `f 51{.,•'os�e ?p ,a>Su NTLI Mp p10 loo 46 sol. • f `` �. is I !.,,_troy I ( r qq r alp t•. 1 /°yp0 .P♦ • 1700 i ja /�/` 70 '�•' 1 �' rpt S u,ro trap e ' n y •.` .A � rd f• � Ind / � \ C� ,• J ie. + h S • sem /' ` —. \-.+ �,`\ / its ob o• DW16(T— A LOCA-nON MAF j c 1 '1 TCf�fll U'L' TL7�ftf.T N)A ' ZI-f�G troi5 i,..00 ifs �. Cq,� ♦. t1NM �kEEK \` • )♦fr SA -LUG1� + L01'1'�ITN'S �U I L l bW N TELT IY--U A u� .'%r � X da si,' •e��lfy� Cit€yR; �' j� ;z.�� tit IE( R X. 1 Ilk Cl' -M� iTL�iA-P S2*r1 T, 11MTn V E T17 ,.,,,,;.; ., a�rr ,.,,?;;f ; ;:4:,a�,1 �� . 5AN771 LVGI�r ZI - G �kj �i� ;i' •`X� hlILLQOLL1V QUA i 70_ ap — ' I 1 X _ � i 1 � I,./.t•� � \�. Ali X N. i= .� I�of ��� •�� EM Fa I7' G T2nGT mn P s&Z �2 Tn/7A-D Vt 77?_ PCr M N F Z I -jG ' X•.� YY�1 L.LHO L.LI/V T7A fn7v_ LI r.. 0 • EXHIBIT D - Findings of Approval TTM 21-86 (Santa Lucia & Lomitas Roads) March 17, 1987 1. The creation of therse parcels will conform to the Zoning Ordin- ance, the General Plan, Land Use Element, Land Use Map, and other General Plan Policies. 2. The creation of these parcels is categoriclly exempt from the pro- visions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Section 15301 (k) ) . 3. The site is physically suitable for the type of residential devel- opment that is proposed. 4. The site is physically suitable for the residential density of development that is proposed. 5. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish and wildlife of their habitat. 6. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvement will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision; or that substantially equivalent alternate easements are provided. 7. The proposed subdivision complies with Section 66474.6 of the State Subdivision Map Act as to methods of handling and discharge of waste. EXHIBIT E - Conditions of Approval TTM-21-86 (Santa Lucia & Lomitas Road) March 17, 1987 1. Road Improvement Plans prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer must be submitted to an approved by the Community Development, Public Works, and Fire Departments prior to recording final map. Plans shall include Fire Hydrants along all fronting roads at 800 foot spacing. Design and locations to be approved by the Fire Department. 2. Prior to recording final map, a soils report or Engineer ' s Certi- fication Statement shall be submitted to the City Engineering De- partment stating that existing soils on the site are adequate to support proposed structures per Chapter 70, Subsection (e) of the Uniform Building Code. 3. Install all street signs, traffic delineation devices, warning and regulatory signs, guardrail, barricades, and other similar devices where required by the Director of Public Works. Signs shall be in conformance with the Department of Public Works standards and the current State of California Uniform Sign Chart. Installation of traffic devices shall be subject to review and modifications after construction. 4. Offer of Dedication to City of Atascadero the following rights of le Way: Street Name: Unnamed common to Lots 1,2, 3, and 4 Limits: From Lomitas to northly lot line of Lot 3 Minimum Width: 20 ' from centerline of right-of-way Street Name: Unnamed common to Lots 10 & 11 Limits: From Lomitas to northly line of Lot 11 Minimum Width: 40' 5. Submit engineering calculations, elevations, and cross-sections to the satisfaction of the City Engineer which locate the limits and depth of flooding on the subject property considering the effects of potential improvements on neighboring properties. 6. Obtain sufficient title or interest in offsite right-of-way to dedicate right-of-way along property frontage of Lomitas Road and Puerta Road and Llano Road. Minimum width 20 ' from centerline, minimum 150 ' centerline radius. Conditions of Approval - TTM 21-86 Santa Lucia and Lomitas Roads Page Two 7. Provide proof acceptble to the Director of Public Works that Lo- mitas Road and Puerta are constructed to City Standards with structural section meeting City Standards. Base upon a T.I.= 4.0. If structural section is deficient, then additional pave- ment (A.C. ) shall be added to meet minimum City Standards as de- termined by Director of Public Works. 8. Obtain Encroachment Permit from City of Atascadero (Public Works Department) . Sign an Inspection Agreement and a Curb and Gutter Agreement, guaranteeing that the work will be done and inspections paid for, prior to the Issuance of a Building Permit, and con- struct improvements as directed by the Encroachment Permit prior to final building inspection. 9. Improve private road to the following standards: 20 ' wide A.C. Traveled Way within a 40' right-of-way as determined by Director of Public Works. Realign and reconstruct intersection of Lomitas Road and Puerta Road and Llano Road to provide a minimum 150 ' centerline radius or as determined by Director of Public Works. 10. Construction of road improvements shall be completed (or bonded for) prior to recording final map. 11. A 75' 0" wide openspace easement shall be provided along the east- erly property line of Lots 5 to 20. 12. A final map, in compliance with all conditions set forth herein, shall be submitted for review and approval in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City Lot Division Ordinance prior to recordation. a. Monuments shall be set at all new property corners created and a registered civil engineer or licensed land surveyor shall indicate, by certificate on the final map, that corners have been set or shall be set by a date specific and that they will be sufficient to enable the survey to be retraced. b. A recently updated preliminary title report shall be sub- mitted for review in conjunction with the processing of the final map. Approval of this tentative tract map shall expire two years from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted pursuant to a written request prior to the expiration date. 0 • EXHIBIT D - Findings of Approval TTM 21-86 (Santa Lucia & Lomitas Roads) March 17, 1987 (R E V I S E D) 1. The creation of therse parcels will conform to the Zoning Ordin- ance, the General Plan, Land Use Element, Land Use Map, and other General Plan Policies. 2. The creation of these parcels, in conformance with the recommended conditions of approval, will not have a significant adverse effect upon the environment. The Negative Declaration prepared for the project is adequate. 3. The site is physically suitable for the type of residential devel- opment that is proposed. 4. The site is physically suitable for the residential density of development that is proposed. 5. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish and wildlife of their habitat. 6 . The design of the subdivision and the type of improvement will not le conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision; or that substantially equivalent alternate easements are provided. 7. The proposed subdivision complies with Section 66474.6 of the State Subdivision Map Act as to methods of handling and discharge of waste. • • EXHIBIT E - Conditions of Approval TTM-21-86 (Santa Lucia & Lomitas Road) March 17, 1987 (R E V I S E D) 1. Road Improvement Plans prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer must be submitted to an approved by the Community Development, Public Works, and Fire Departments prior to recording final map. Plans shall include Fire Hydrants along all fronting roads at 800 foot spacing. Design and locations to be approved by the Fire Department. 2. Prior to recording final map, a soils report or Engineer ' s Certi- fication Statement shall be submitted to the City Engineering De- partment stating that existing soils on the site are adequate to support proposed structures per Chapter 70 , Subsection (e) of the Uniform Building Code. 3. Install all street signs, traffic delineation devices, warning and regulatory signs, guardrail, barricades, and other similar devices where required by the Director of Public Works. Signs shall be in conformance with the Department of Public Works standards and the current State of California Uniform Sign Chart. Installation of traffic devices shall be subject to review and modifications after construction. 4. Offer of Dedication to City of Atascadero the following rights of Way: Street Name: Unnamed common to Lots 1,2, 3, and 4 Limits: From Lomitas to northly lot line of Lot 3 Minimum Width: 20 ' from centerline of right-of-way Street Name: Unnamed common to Lots 10 & 11 Limits: From Lomitas to northly line of Lot 11 Minimum Width: 40 ' 5. Obtain sufficient title or interest in offsite right-of-way to dedicate right-of-way along property frontage of Lomitas Road and Puerta Road and Llano Road. Minimum width 20 ' from centerline, minimum 150 ' centerline radius. • Conditions of Approval - TTM 21-86 (R E V I S E D) Santa Lucia and Lomitas Roads Page Two 6. Provide proof acceptble to the Director of Public Works that Lo- mitas Road and Puerta are constructed to City Standards with structural section meeting City Standards. Base upon a T. I.= 4.0. If structural section is deficient, then additional pave- ment (A.C. ) shall be added to meet minimum City Standards as de- termined by Director of Public Works. 7. Obtain Encroachment Permit from City of Atascadero (Public Works Department) . Sign an Inspection Agreement and a Curb and Gutter Agreement, guaranteeing that the work will be done and inspections paid for, prior to the Issuance of a Building Permit, and con- struct improvements as directed by the Encroachment Permit prior to final building inspection. 8. Improve the private road between Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4 to the fol- lowing standards: 20 ' wide A.C. Traveled Way within a 40 ' right-of-way as determined by Director of Public Works. Realign and reconstruct intersection of Lomitas Road and Puerta le Road and Llano Road to provide a minimum 150 ' centerline radius or as determined by Director of Public Works. 9. Construction of road improvements shall be completed (or bonded for) prior to recording final map. 10. A 7510" wide openspace easement shall be provided along the east- erly property line of Lots 5 to 20 . 11. A final map, in compliance with all conditions set forth herein, shall be submitted for review and approval in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City Lot Division Ordinance prior to recordation. a. Monuments shall be set at all new property corners created and a registered civil engineer or licensed land surveyor shall indicate, by certificate on the final map, that corners have been set or shall be set by a date specific and that they will be sufficient to enable the survey to be retraced. b. A recently updated preliminary title report shall be sub- mitted for review in conjunction with the processing of the final map. 12. Approval of this tentative tract map shall expire two years from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted pursuant to a written request prior to the expiration date. TTM 21-86 (Millholli�'artaglia) (R E V I S E Do Page Three 13. Creation of a 75 foot wide open space easement shall be accom- plished across the ridge line area of the lots to assure that the project area is kept free from construction. Minutes - Plann& Commission - March 17, *7 4. Tentative Tract Map 21-86 : Request initiated by Glen Millhollin (Tartaglia Engineering) 4po subdivide 6 existing lots, totaling 119. 6 acres, into 22 lots var- ying in size from 26.3 acres to 3.1 acres. Subject property is located on the north side of Santa Lucia and Lomitas Road, Lots 1, 2, 4, 5, 6 , 7 and 8 of PM 28-30 (being a resubdivision of Lot 10A, Block 43 in Atascadero Colony) . Mr. Moses, Assoc. Planner, gave staff report. He noted revisions to the Findings of Approval, Exh. D, and Conditions of Approval, Exh. E: - Finding #2 should be changed to reflect a standard Negative Dec- laration; - Finding #5 should be deleted, after discussion with the appli- cant' s engineer and Public Works Dept. staff today; - Condition #9 should read, "Improve private road between lots . 1, 2, 3 and 4 to the following standards. . . " . - Staff recommends the addition of a Condition #13, that creation of a 75' wide open space easement be accomplished across the ridge line area of the lots to assure that the project area is kept free from construction. Commissioner Nolan expressed concern regarding the need to widen the bridge at Santa Lucia Rd. , noting a recent, similar application when same concern was raised (re: Drake application) ; Mr. Moses responded that Pub. Works did note a possible need to improve the bridge, h ever , did not specify any finite details regarding this applicati 0 Mr. DeCamp commented that the Pub. Works Director expressed that dev- elopment fees on each of the lots, as they' re developed, will earmark money for specific off-site improvements, feeling this is an equitable way to fund such improvements as widening the bridge. Commissioner Nolan expressed he feels it is appropriate that a Pub. Works represen- tative be present to address the bridge concerns; Mr. Engen noted the Pub. Works Director or his representative will be present when the Drake issue is before the Commission again. Public Comment Robert Tartaglia, Tartaglia & Assoc. , commented he and his client are in agreement with the conditions as stated. Joe Wilmore, 5500 Llano Rd. , reiterated his concerns (expressed at hearing for Drake application) regarding the narrow Santa Lucia Bridge conditions, requesting installation of stop signs at either end of said bridge. He expressed opposition to further development until road safety concerns are remedied. Bruno Adamoli, 5800 Llano, seconded the comments of the previous speaker. He urges maintainence/trimming of shrubs along Llano to im- prove poor site distance/visibility, expressing that past requests of Pub. Works have been futile. Contrary to his comments at the Dr hearing, he feels the improvement of Llano Rd. is the City' s respon bility and not Mr. Drake' s. 4 Minutes - Plannie Commission - March 17, A Robert Nimmo, 7375 Bella Vista, expressed support for the concept of expecting that development fees are a reasonable approach to resolving bridge problems; he suggested the Commission approve TTM 21-86 as proposed. Discussion by staff and Commission revolved around bridge concerns. MOTION: By Commissioner Hatchell for continuance of this item pending review by the Traffic Committee for the possibility of a 3-way stop sign at Llano Rd. & Santa Lucia Rd. and the con- sideration of either (or both) the Traffic Committee or Pub. Works Dept. regarding the possibility of widening the bridge on Santa Lucia Rd. , seconded by Commissioner Kidwell; passed by 4: 3 roll-call, with Commissioners Copelan, Michielssen and Bond dissenting. COMMISSION RECESSED FOR BREAK AT 9 : 23 P.M. CHAIRMAN BOND CALLED THE MEETING BACK TO ORDER AT 9 : 36 P.M. Chairman Bond requested the following two items be combined, as they pertain to the same property. 5. Zone Change 23-86 : Request initiated by California Manor (Ted and Judy Young) to re- vise the existing RMF-16 (Residential Multi-Family 16 units per acre) by adding a PD (Planned Development) overlay allowing for a reduced lot size and a reduced sideyard setback. 6. Tentative Tract Map 37-86 : Tract Map request initiated by Ted and Judy Young (California Man- or) implementing Zone Change 23-86 to divide a .44 acre parcel into five (5) lots of 5440 , 3473, 3323 , 3172 and 3573 square .feet. Subject property is located at 7421 Santa Ysabel, Lot 65 of Block lA in Atascadero Colony. Mr. Moses, Assoc. Planner, gave staff reports and responded to ques- tions from the Commission. Public Comment Alan Volbrecht, agent for applicants, expressed they have no questions with regard to conditions as presented. Judy Young, applicant, summarized particular features of proposed un- its: 3-bdrms. , 2-story, approx. 1400 sq. ft. , designed for purchase (not rental) by first home buyers, with a price goal of $89 ,900 . All have their own side or backyards. She explained that the P.U.D. con- cept was chosen because they felt Santa Ysabel already has a great amount of apartments/condominiums, and they believe their 5-unit approach will decrease traffic on the street; affordability and the concept of owning a home was considered for the benefit of young fam- ilies. 5 Minutes - Planning Commission - April 7 , 1987 MOTION: By s_ioner Lopez-Balbontin n inue the hearing on Tentative 'T1ao•t_Ka,L - ntil such time that the applicant and staff c agreement satisfactory to both a motion passed with ioner Copelan dissenting. 2. Tentative Tract Map 21-86 : Request initiated by Glen Millhollin (Tartaglia Engineering) to subdivide six existing lots, totaling 119.6 acres, into 22 lots varying in size from 26.3 acres to 3.1 acres. Subject property is located on the northside of Santa Lucia and Lomitas roads, Lots 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 of PM 28-30 . (CONTINUED FROM REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 17, 1987) Mr. DeCamp noted the action taken by the Commission at the March 17th meeting to postpone a decision on the map pending a decision by the Traffic Committee concerning the possiblity of stop signs on the Santa Lucia bridge, and pointed out that the request was again on this agen- da due to the similarities with this map and the previous one (Drake) pertaining to the development problems associated with both maps. He further pointed out that in order to re-open the matter for discus- sion, it would be necessary for one of the commissioners who previous- ly made a motion to continue the matter (at the March 17th meeting) to* make a motion to reopen the matter for discussion. Chairman Bond asked Mr. Tartaglia, agent for the applicants if this was his desire, to which Mr. Tartaglia stated he would ,like to see the matter go ahead. Mr. DeCamp stated that a decision could not be made on the conditions of the bridge issue due to the Traffic Committee's decision being made after the Planning Commission' s second meeting. MOTION: By Commissioner Lopez-Balbontin to re-open the hearing on Tentative Tract Map 21-86; seconded by Commissioner Nolan; passed unanimously. Mr. DeCamp presented the staff report on the matter providing a back- ground on the request. He pointed out the memo describing the infor- mation presently available on the Santa Lucia bridge. In response to question from Chairman Bond, Mr. Moses stated he has been in contact with CalTrans noting that the structure is scheduled for review within three months, but that CalTrans would try to move ahead to do the inspection as soon as possible. Mr. Sensibaugh elaborated on the available bridge monies as a result of the recent passage of a highway bill. Mr . Tartaglia stated that with regard to condition #2, he has submit-0 ted the necessary soils report. Mr . DeCamp stated that the condition could not be deleted but that the condition had been met by the appli- cant; he further stated that there were some revisions to the condi- 4 0 • Minutes - Planning Commission - April 7, 1987 tions from the March 17th meeting which were inadvertently left out from this agenda, but should be included. Mr. Tartaglia stated he would like to have approval of the map with exception of the bridge issue. Bruno Adamoli commented on the map request. Bonita Borgeson asked why an Environmental Impact Report was not re- quired for this project to which Mr. Engen explained that this project involved large acreage parcels proposed with the net increase being 16 three acre parcels which is consistent with the neighborhood. The bridge widening is not part of the project description although it has become an issue as an off-site question for the area; he elaborated on the various development issues in relation to the area. Commissioner Lopez-Balbontin asked if it is determined that the crea- tion of the proposed 16 lots would have an impact on traffic, would the applicant be required to participate in the cost for a portion of the bridge improvement. Mr. DeCamp stated there would be a way to determine what the exact impact of the 16 new lots would be on that bridge in terms of the average daily traffic that is generated com- pared to the amount of traffic on the bridge presently. He explained the difficulties in requiring this because of the "open-ended" nature of the condition. Mr. Engen added that if the Commission felt it may take too long for bridge improvements to be addressed through fees, there could be recommendations made by the Commission to looking at other revenue raising mechanisms to speed up the process. A traffic study could be required of the applicant. In response to question from Commissioner Michielssen, Mr. Sensibaugh elaborated on the cost comparisons per square foot for bridges. MOTION: By Commissioner Nolan to approve Tentative Tract Map 21-86 . based on the findings and revised conditions of approval (re- vised at the March 17th Commission meeting) ; seconded by Com- missioner Copelan. Commissioner Lopez-Balbontin asked that consideration be given in . the future to have some sort of mechanism that would require developers to pay for whatever improvements must be made. Commissioner Michielssen asked for clarification on the revised conditions of approval. Motion passed 5 :0 with a roll call vote. 3. Ten ' e Parcel Ma 3-87 : Request in ' ' ted by Robert and Bert u tz (Thomas E. Baumber- ger) to allow su 'vision of o arcel containing 0 .93 acres into two lots containingres each. Subject property is located at 9005 Atsac •Avenu ortion Lot 12, Block 10 , Atascadero Colony) 5 apY i J MEMORANDUM • TO: City Council April 28, 1987 VIA: Michael Shelton, City Manager FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director Ate SUBJECT: Tentative Parcel Map 3-87 LOCATION: 9005 Atascadero Avenue (Ptn. 12, Block 10) APPLICANT: Robert and Bertha Shultz (Thomas E. Baumberger) REQUEST: Subdivison of one parcel containing 0 .93 acres into two lots containing 0.46 acres each. BACKGROUND: At their meeting held April 7, 1987, the Planning Commission conducted • a public hearing on the above-referenced subject, approving the re- quest on a 4 :1 vote subject to the findings and revised conditions of approval contained in the attached staff report. There was considerable discussion and public testimony, especially as it related to sidewalk improvements, as reflected in the attached minutes excerpt. RECOMMENDATION: Approval subject to the findings and revised conditions of approval recommended by the Planning Commission. HE:ps ATTACHMENTS : Staff Report - April 7 , 1987 Revised Conditions of Approval Minutes Excerpt - April 7 , 1987 cc: Robert and Bertha Shultz Thomas E. Baumberger • i 0 City of Atascadero Item: C.3 STAFF REPORT FOR: ((Planning Commission Meeting Date: April 7, 1987 BY:pPlsteven L. DeCamp, Senior Planner File No: TPM 3-87 Project Address: 9005 Atascadero Ave. (Ptn. Lot 12; Block 10; AC) SUBJECT: Subdivision of one parcel containing 0.93 acres into two (2) lots con- taining 0.46 acres each. BACKGROUND: Notice of public hearing was published in the Atascadero News on Fri- day, March 27, 1987. All property owners of record located within 300 feet of the subject property were also notified on that date. A. SITUATION AND FACTS: 1. Applicant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Robert& Bertha Shultz • 2. Representative. . . . . . . . . . . . . .Thomas E. Baumberger 3. Site Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0.93 acres 4. Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .RSF-X (Residential Single Fam- ily - 20 ,000 sq. ft. minimum lot size) 5. Existing Use. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Parcel 1 - Single Family Dwelling Parcel 2 - Vacant 6. Adjacent Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . .North: RSF-X South: P (Santa Rosa School) East: RSF-X West: RSF-X 7. General Plan Designation. . . .High Density Single Family 8. Environmental Status. . . . . . . .Negative Declaration posted February 23, 1987 • 0 Staff Report - TPM 3-87 9005 Atascadero Ave. (Shultz/Baumberger) Page Two B. ANALYSIS: The application before the Commission proposes the subdivision of one parcel containing 0.93 acres into two (2) parcels containg 0 . 469 and 0.463 acres. The property proposed for subdivision is located in a RSF-X (Residential Single Family) zoning district. The minimum lot size in this zone is 0.5 acres where sanitary sewers are not available and 20,000 square feet where sewers are available. Because sewers are available in the subject area, the 20 ,000 square foot minimum lot size is applicable. The subject property currently contains a single family residence on Parcel 1. Upon completion of the subdivision, Parcel 2 will be avail- able for construction of an additional single family dwelling. Each of the two lots will have direct access to Atascadero Avenue. The area surrounding the subject parcel was the subject of recent Gen- eral Plan and Zoning Ordinance amendments allowing for the establish- ment of one-half acre and 20 ,000 square foot lots. The proposal be- fore the Commission is in conformance with the new General Plan and Zoning Ordinance provisions. Staff believes that the type and density of development proposed is appropriate for the neighborhood. C. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends conditional approval of Tentative Parcel Map 3-87 based on the Findings in Exhibit C and the Conditions of Approval in Exhibit D. SLD:ph Attachments: Exhibit A - Location and Zoning Map Exhibit B — Tentative Parcel Map Exhibit C - Findings for Approval Exhibit D - Conditions of Approval ` • opt Zoo r&jq a ref ,N►� TFM 3—37 wE — SF - LLA F • i M (PD 0 S AV ' `> El`,ATE S //�j� O N. J o a .10AN :la i cP vs c aQ• / I 'i yJ c ISa �a .TO&At R L / Alf ' / l�f ; p o A \0\ AS\AQERp O�� •�,\�. s G \ AJ © / Q 1 P P AVE�� VP\ 1 S / Y._ 01 1Z5F- x 20, Doo -0ke 6IEW • a / L(FH �� S F \1 �P S �.tT► ppb o A CXtItBt� a Via.►-►�: Pa�.l Nl a� TPM 3-S`7 73 ZA p _ t1 II d i� 0 / cl `i �v y SQA I h n e y 2 a ,'14 a i • EXHIBIT C - Findings for Approval TPM 3-87 (Shultz/Baumberger) April 7 , 1987 FINDINGS: 1. The creation of these parcels conforms to the zoning ordinance and the General Plan. 2. The creation of these parcels, in conformance with the recommended Conditions of Approval, will not have a significant adverse effect upon the environment. The Negative Declaration prepared for the project is adequate. 3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development pro- posed. 4. The site is physically suitable for the density of development proposed. 5. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish and wildlife of their habitat. 6. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvement will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision; or that substantially equivalent alternate easements are provided. 7. The proposed subdivision complies with Section 66474.6 of the State Subdivision Map Act as to methods of handling and discharge of waste. i • EXHIBIT D - Conditions of Approval TPM 3-87 (Shultz/Baumberger) April 7 , 1987 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. Water shall be obtained from the Atascadero Mutual Water Company and water lines shall exist at the frontage of each parcel or its public utility easement prior to recordation of the final map. 2. All existing and proposed utility easements, pipelines and other easements are to be shown on the final map. If there are other building or other restrictions related to the easements, they shall be noted on the final map. 3. Wastewater disposal shall be by connection to the public sewer. 4. Obtain sewer connection permits from the Public Works Department prior to hooking up to the public sewer. 5. A sewer annexation fee for the newly created parcel shall be paid prior to recording the final map. 6. A sewer connection fee for each single family lot shall be due in addition to usual connection, tap-in, and installation fees prior to issuance of building permits. 7. The existing fire hydrant at the intersection of Atascadero Ave. and Portola Avenue shall be upgraded to City Standards prior to recording the final map. 8. Road improvement plans prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer must be submitted to and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to recording the final map. 9. Construction of road improvements shall be completed (or bonded for) prior to recording the final map. Required improvements shall be to the following standards: paveout twenty (20) feet from the centerline of Atascadero Avenue and a City standard drive approach to serve each parcel. 10. An irrevocable offer of dedication to the City of Atascadero for the following right-of-way for future road and sidewalk purposes shall be made and noted on the final map: Street Name: Atascadero Avenue Limits: Entire frontage of subject property Minimum Width: 30 feet from centerline • s Conditions of Approval TPM 3-87 Page IT q ` 1. The applicant shall enter into an agreement, acceptable to the City Attorney, agreeing to install sidewalks along the entire frontage of the property along Atascadero Road to City standards as may be required by the City upon completion of a sidewalk needs analysis. 12. Participate in eliminating a portion of the flood hazard to the property by posting a performance security with the City to be used for a drainage improvement project for channelizing the out- flow from Atascadero Lake to Atascadero Creek. In the event that a future assessment district is formed for the area drainage im- provements that include this project, then credit in the amount of the deposit will be applied towards final apportionment of the assessment if allowed by the assessment district proceedings. This shall appear as a note on the final map. 13. A final map drawn in substantial conformance with the approved tentative map and in compliance with all conditions set forth herein shall be submitted for review and approval in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City Lot Division Ordinance prior to recordation. a. Monuments shall be set at all new property corners created and a registered civil engineer or licensed land surveyor shall indicate, by certificate on the final map, that corners have been set or shall be set by a date specific and that they will be sufficient to enable the survey to be retraced. b. A recently updated preliminary title report shall be sub- mitted for review in conjunction with the processing of the final map. C. A preliminary subdivision guarantee shall be submitted for review in conjunction with the processing of the final map. 14. Approval of this tentative parcel map shall expire two years from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted pursuant to a written request prior to the expiration date. i 0 EXHIBIT D - Conditions of Approval TPM 3-87 (Shultz/Baumberger) April 7 , 1987 (R E V I S E D) CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. Water shall be obtained from the Atascadero Mutual Water Company and water lines shall exist at the frontage of each parcel or its public utility easement prior to recordation of the final map. 2. All existing and proposed utility easements, pipelines and other easements are to be shown on the final map. If there are other building or other restrictions related to the easements, they shall be noted on the final map. 3. Wastewater disposal shall be by connection to the public sewer . 4. Obtain sewer connection permits from the Public Works Department prior to hooking up to the public sewer. 5. A sewer annexation fee for the newly created parcel shall be paid prior to recording the final map. 6. A sewer connection fee for each single family lot shall be due in addition to usual connection, tap-in, and installation fees prior to issuance of building permits. 7. The existing fire hydrant at the intersection of Atascadero Ave. and Portola Avenue shall be upgraded to City Standards prior to recording the final map. 8. Road improvement plans prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer must be submitted to and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to recording the final map. 9. Construction of road improvements shall be completed (or bonded for) prior to recording the final map. Required improvements shall be to the following standards: paveout twenty (20) feet from the centerline of Atascadero Avenue and a City standard drive approach to serve each parcel. 10. An irrevocable offer of dedication to the City of Atascadero for the following right-of-way for future road and sidewalk purposes shall be made and noted on the final map: Street Name: Atascadero Avenue Limits: Entire frontage of subject property Minimum Width: 30 feet from centerline • s Conditions of Approval TPM 3-87 Page Two 11. The applicant shall enter into an agreement, acceptable to the City Attorney, agreeing to install sidewalks along the entire frontage of the property along Atascadero Road to City standards as may be required by the City upon completion of a sidewalk needs analysis. Said agreement may be in the form of a lien against the parcel. The cost of improvements will be collected only upon City determination that the owners of at least fifty-one percent (51%) of the land area in the affected territory are to install sidewalks. 12. A final map drawn in substantial conformance with the approved tentative map and in compliance with all conditions set forth herein shall be submitted for review and approval in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City Lot Division Ordinance prior to recordation. a. Monuments shall be set at all new property corners created and a registered civil engineer or licensed land surveyor shall indicate, by certificate on the final map, that corners have been set or shall be set by a date specific and that they will be sufficient to enable the survey to be retraced. b. A recently updated preliminary title report shall be sub- mitted for review in conjunction with the processing of the final map. C. A preliminary subdivision guarantee shall be - submitted for review in conjunction with the processing of the final map. 13. Approval of this tentative parcel map shall expire two years from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted pursuant to a written request prior to the expiration date. i i Minutes - Planning Commission - April 7, 1987 tions from the March 17th meeting which were inadvertently le��d out rom this agenda, but should be included. Mr . Tartaglia sta he w uld like to have approval of the map with exception of t bridge is e. Bruno damoli commented on the map request. Bonita Bo eson asked why an Environmental Impact Repo t was not re- quired for is project to which Mr. Engen explained hat this project involved lar acreage parcels proposed with the t increase being 16 three acre arcels which is consistent with t e neighborhood. The bridge widening ' not part of the project desc ption although it has become an issue as an off-site question for th area; he elaborated on the various develop nt issues in relation t the area. Commissioner Lopez-Bal b ntin asked if it ' determined that the crea- tion of the proposed lots would h e an impact on traffic, would the applicant be required part icipa in the cost for a portion of the bridge improvement. r. DeC p stated there would be a way to determine what the exact lm of a 16 new lots would be on that bridge in terms of the avera aily traffic that is generated com- pared to the amount of traffic o the bridge presently. He explained the difficulties in requiring hi because of the "open-ended" nature of the condition. Mr. Engen dded t t if the Commission felt it may take too long for bridge mprovemen s to be addressed through fees, there could be recommendations made by a Commission to looking at other revenue raising echanisms to spe up the process. A traffic study could be require of the applicant. In response to ques on from Commissioner Mich lssen, Mr. Sensibaugh elaborated on the ost comparisons per square fo t for bridges. MOTION: By Co issioner Nolan to approve Tentative ract Map 21=86 base on the findings and revised conditions of approval (re- vi d at the March 17th Commission meeting) ; conded by Com- m' s Copelan. Commissioner Lopez-Balbontin asked that consideration be gi n in . the futur�to have some sort of mechanism that would require deve pers to pay or whatever improvements must be made. Commissioner Mich ' elssen askred for clarification on the revised conditions of approval. / Motion passed 5 :0 with a roll call vote. 3. Tentative Parcel Map 3-87 : Request initiated by Robert and Bertha Shultz (Thomas E. Baumber- ger) to allow subdivision of one parcel containing 0 .93 acres into two lots containing 0 . 46 acres each. Subject property is located at 9005 Atsacadero Avenue (portion Lot 12, Block 10, Atascadero Colony) . -- 5 0 Minutes - Planning Commission - April 7 , 1987 Mr. DeCamp presented the staff report recommending conditional approv 0 al of the request. He pointed out that condition #12 should be elim- inated as the item is already covered by ordinance and it is not nec- essary to appear on maps as a note. He further noted that there have been a series of map applications submitted around the intersection of Atascadero Avenue and Portola and the Fire Department has made a re- quirement to upgrade the existing fire hydrant near that intersection. The applicant has paid for the hydrant improvement as part of the original submittal and felt it may be to the applicant' s advantage to talk to some of the other property owners with maps in progress to try to recoup some of the hydrant costs. Commissioner Michielssen asked if sidewalks are going to be required in residential single family zones. Mr. DeCamp stated that safety considerations are being studied with respect to development of prop- erties in the area of the Santa Rosa Road School, and explained that staff has been working with the School District in developing a "route to school" ; he stated that because of the increased level of use by school-age children, it might be appropriate to require the installa- tion of sidewalks along property frontages; he elaborated on a type of agreement which could involve a lien against the newly created parcels which would allow for sidewalk installations in the future. Lengthy discussion ensued on this matter with emphasis on sidewalk assessment districts, lien agreements. Tom Baumberger, agent for the applicants, stated he did not recive a copy of the conditions of approval and could not speak for the appli- cants on the matter but commented on the sidewalk issue saying he felt it would be better for everyone' s best interests to have all the side- walks put in at the same time. Upon reviewing the conditions, Mr. Baumberger stated he could speak for the owners and that they would accept the conditions with the exception of the sidewalk requirement. However, they might be receptive to the condition knowing that they would not be required to pay any money at this time until the issue is resolved. Jane Smith, 8950 Atascadero Avenue, spoke in opposition to the pro- posed lot split. Dennis Lockridge, 8935 Atascadero Avenue, also expressed opposition to the request and talked about the importance of requiring sidewalks for the children' s safety. John Falkenstien addressed the sidewalk issue saying that it would impact other developments he is involved in; he felt the issue is not whether the sidewalks are necessary but how the condition can be im-- plemented; he-'expressed opposition to a lien on property procedure and felt the issue should be dealt with as a whole Marge Mackey felt it would be fair to have a statement reflecting that if sidewalks are required in the neighborhood, that the particular property would contribute to them. This would avoid the complaints heard in relation to the Separado sewer area. 6 i 0 Minutes - Planning Commission - April 7 , 1987 There was further discussion concerning an equitable agreement being reached after a sidewalk study is completed. It was noted that in this particular area there was a limited amount of future development. Mr. Engen added that when the density in this neighborhood was re- cently changed, one of the primary concerns of the neighbors had been the need for sidewalks. Mr. Sensibaugh proposed an alternative simi- lar to what Public Works uses for detention basins which involves pay- ing a fixed amount for improvements which goes into a sinking fund. Mr. Baumberger stated that the applicants would be in favor of a solution proposed by Mr. Sensibaugh rather than having a lien placed against their property. Commissioner Copelan expressed concern that these lots are too long and narrow for a adequate building sites. MOTION: By Commissioner Copelan to approve Parcel Map 3-87 subject to the findings and conditions of approval with the exception of Condition #12 which is to be deleted; seconded by Commis- sioner Nolan. Commissioner Michielssen moved to amend the motion to modify condition #11 to add: " . . . sidewalk needs analysis. How- ever , the money shall not be called forth until a minimum 51% of the property owners in the benefit assessment district have agreed to participate, or if some other method is ar- ranged whereby 51% or more of the property owners will parti- cipate in the cost and installation of the sidewalk. Commis- sioner Nolan seconded the amendment to the motion. There was further discussion concerning 51% of the land area as op- posed to 51% of the property owners. Mr . Sensibaugh stated that an override of a protest is based on land area and not frontage. Commissioner Michielssen further amended his motion to re- flect 51% of the land area instead of 51% of the property owners. Commissioner Nolan seconded the amendment. Motion to the amendment passed with a 3: 2 vote with Commis- sioners Copelan and Lopez-Balbontin dissenting. Motion to approve Tentative Parcel Map 3-87 with the elimina- tion of condition #12 and amendment to condition #11 passed 4:1 with Commissioner Lopez-Balbontin dissenting. 4. Tentative Tract Ma 4-87 : Request initiated by Michael Hawkins (Cuesta Engineering) to allow subdivision of one parcel containing 4.93 acres into ten lots con- taining between 20,100 square feet and 24 ,720 square feet each. Subject property is located at 9240 Atascadero Avenue (Lot 2, Block 12, Atascadero Colony) . 7 DATE-_ _A"• M E M O R A N D U M TO: City Council April 28 , 1987 VIA: Michael Shelton, City Manager FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director Jt4_ SUBJECT: Tentative Tract Map 4-87 LOCATION: 9240 Atascadero Avenue (Lot 2, Block 12) APPLICANT: Michael Hawkins (Cuesta Engineering) REQUEST: Subdivision of one parcel of 4.93 acres into ten lots con- taining between 20 , 100 square feet and 24,720 square feet. BACKGROUND: At their April 7 , 1987 meeting, the Planning Commission conducted a • public hearing on the above-referenced subject, approving the land division request on a 3 :1 vote subject to the findings and revised conditions as reflected in the attached staff report. There was considerable discussion and public testimony, especially as it related to downstream drainage improvements, as reflected in the attached minutes excerpt. RECOMMENDATION: Approval subject to the Planning Commission' s recommended findings and revised conditions of approval. HE:ps ATTACHMENTS: Staff Report - April 7, 1987 Revised Conditions of Approval Minutes Excerpt - April 7 , 1987 cc: Michael Hawkins Cuesta Engineering City of Atascadero Item: C.4 • STAFF REPORT FOR: Planning Commission Meeting Date: 4/7/87 BY:Os teven L. Decamp, Senior Planner File No: TTM 4-87 Project Address: 9240 Atascadero Avenue (Lot 2, Block 12, AC) SUBJECT: Subdivision of one parcel containing 4.93 acres into ten (10) lots containing between 20,100 square feet and 24,720 square feet. BACKGROUND: Notice of public hearing was published in the Atascadero News on Fri- day, March 27, 1987. All property owners of record located within 300 feet of the subject property were also notified on that date. A. SITUATION AND FACTS: 1. Applicant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Michael Hawkins 2. Representative. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Cuesta Engineering 3. Site Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4.93 acres 4. Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .RSF-X (20,000 square foot mini- mum lot size) 5. Existing Use. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Vacant 6. Adjacent Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . .North: RSF-X South: RSF-X East: P (Santa Rosa School) West: RSF-Y 7 . General Plan Designation. . . . .High Density Single Family 8. Environmental Status. . . . . . . . .Negative Declaration posted February 23, 1987. B. ANALYSIS: The application before the Commission proposes the subdivision of one parcel containing 4. 93 acres into ten (10) parcels ranging in size between 20 ,100 and 24,720 square feet. The property proposed for subdivision is located in an RSF-X (Residential Single Family)0 zoning district. The minimum lot size in this zone is 0 .5 acres where sewers are unavailable and 20,000 square feet where sanitary sewer service is available. Because each of the proposed lots is 0 0 Tentative Tract Map 4-87 (Michael Hawkins/Cuesta Engineering) to be sewered, the 20 ,000 square foot lot size is applicable in this case. The property proposed for subdivision is relatively flat and ap- pears well suited for its intended use as a residential develop- ment. There are numerous trees on the site which can be saved by careful placement of building pads and other improvements. There are no buildings or other improvements on the property at this time. The area surrounding the subject parcel was the subject of recent General Plan and Zoning Ordinance amendments allowing for the es- tablishment of one-half acre and 20 ,000 square foot lots. The proposal before the Commission is in conformance with the new General Plan and Zoning Ordinance provisions. Staff believes that the type and density of development proposed is appropriate for the neighborhood. C. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends conditional approval of Tentative Tract Map 4-87 based on the Findings in Exhibit C and the Conditions of Approval in Exhibit D. SLD:ps ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A - Location and Zoning Map Exhibit B - Tentative Parcel Map Exhibit C - Findings for Approval Exhibit D - Conditions of Approval 2 � E " pvE �, \� • \ a i LL RM F 1 s i > . M (PD I 0 .1v 9v EL-CORtE • 1 _.n moi. -dJ -aF- w 6 d.♦ �P `\ > •ol ♦ O ir C r '4i C� co ♦vQc Y,9• ' �� W 7 s J cR/gTa R cT i • 9L� \ �qVE� G ,CR y i r' AS\ApEFO / pP\ �•\ \ Pcr / v0 < \ • �� P PH AVE t ♦E1 0P t\l\\ dOS. ¢ VP\ /0471, /b. (P N o --asGatA�✓o Avc.. XI/ �? F 9 Z4 a X� RSFX z0) 000 gq• �f� S F.1 L(FH) 7..y � � o �o �� �� s RrvE� j/ RSF-X( H) ol4 / � � ► 1 � RS . I -7 qMn 0 ExN-i�31 i E3 ` - -rM I zz � ro �v U ; N � $ A--ti'' o _ g uo° , - Y— !•IJGfQ d•$- L•zw �N JWF ATA5CADCAP A YES E zt nv� `r = otio�oa2 � gD� m co" � Fc7one� Z ys� Z ti �> `cam' e •� \ o�aDi� on� �l 4+sa....v �✓env[ W �1 42�� 3 R m F n ;�. �gTam2 °moi �c 2 T 9 9 Tentative Tract Map 4-87 (Michael Hawkins/Cuesta Engineering) EXHIBIT C - Tentative Tract Map 4-87 Findings for Approval July 7, 1986 FINDINGS: 1. The creation of these parcels conforms to the Zoning Ordinance and the General Plan. 2. The creation of these parcels, in conformance with the recommended conditions of approval, will not have a significant adverse effect upon the environment. The Negative Declaration prepared for the project is adequate. 3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development that is proposed. 4. The site is physically suitable for the density of , development that is proposed. 5. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish and wildlife or their habitat. 6. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvement will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision; or that substantially equivalent alternate easements are provided. 7. The proposed subdivision complies with Section 66474. 6 of the State Subdivision Map Act as to methods of handling and discharge of waste. Tentative Tract Map 4-87 (Michael Hawkins/Cuesta Engineering) EXHIBIT D - Tentative Tract Map 4-87 Conditions of Approval April 7, 1987 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. Water shall be obtained from the Atascadero Mutual Water Company and water lines shall exist at the frontage of each parcel or its public utility easement prior to recordation of the final map. 2. All existing and proposed utility easements, pipelines and other easements are to be shown on the final map. If there are other building or other restrictions related to the easements, they shall be noted on the final map. 3. Grading, drainage, and erosion control plans, prepared by a regis- tered civil engineer, shall be submitted for review and approval by the Community Development and Public Works Departments prior to recording the final map. 4. Drainage work and facilities shall be constructed to City stand- ards prior to recording a final map. 5. Prior to recording the final map a soils investigation (as re- quired by the Map Act) shall be submitted, recommending corrective action which will prevent structural damage to each structure pro- posed to be constructed in the area where soils problems may exist. The date of such reports, the name of the engineer making the report, and the location where the reports are on file shall be noted on the final map. 6. Road improvement plans prepared by a registered civil engineer must be submitted to and approved by the Public Works Department prior to recording the final map. 7. Construction of road improvements shall be completed prior to re- cording the final map, and shall include paving of the entire road and cul-de-sac as shown on the tentative map. 8. Construct an Atascadero City standard cul-de-sac at the terminus of the new road serving the tract. 9. Road improvements shall be to the following standards: City-accepted road: 1. 20 foot wide AC traveled way 2. 24 foot wide road bed 3. Minimum 110 foot centerline radius 4. 40 foot wide right-of-way Tentative Tract Map 4-87 (Michael Hawkins/Cuesta Engineering) 10. All road grading shall be completed prior to recording the final map. 11. An irrevocable offer of dedication to the City of Atascadero for the following right-of-way for future road purposes shall be made and noted on the final map: Street name: Atascadero Avenue Limits: Property frontage Minimum width: Thirty (30) feet from centerline Street name: Unnamed Limits: From Atascadero Avenue to terminus of cul-de-sac Minimum width: 40 foot right-of-way with 48 foot cul-de-sac radius and 20 foot corner rounding at intersection 12. Install all street signs, traffic delineation devices, warning and regulatory signs, guardrail, barricades, and other similar devices where required by the Public Works Director. Signs shall be in conformance with the Public Works Department standards and the rent State of California uniform sign chart. Installation of traffic devices shall be subject to review and modifications after construction. 13. The property owner shall enter into an agreement, acceptable to the City Attorney, agreeing to install sidewalks along the entire le frontage of the property along Atascadero Avenue to City standards as may be deemed necessary by a sidewalk needs assessment. 14. An offer of dedication to the public for the Public Utilities Easement shall be made. 15. All offers of dedication shall be completed and recorded prior to or simultaneously to recording the final map. 16. A City standard fire hydrant shall be installed at the frontage of proposed lot #3 prior to recording the final map. 17. The fire hydrant located at the intersection of Portola Road and Atascadero Avenue shall be upgraded to City standards. 18. A name for the future road shall be selected and presented to the Planning Commission for approval. Said name shall then appear on the road on the final map. 19. Obtain an encroachment permit from the City of Atascadero. Sign an Inspection Agreement and a Curb and Gutter Agreement, guaran- teeing that the work will be done and inspections paid for , prior to issuance of a building permit, and construct improvements as directed by the Encroachment Permit, prior to recording the final map. Tentative Tract Map 4-87 (Michael Hawkins/Cuesta Engineering) 20. Plan and profile drawings of proposed individual driveways, drive- way easements and private roads shall be submitted for approval by the Community Development and Public Works Departments in order to determine average grade and appropriate improvement requirements. This shall appear as a note on the final map. 21. Wastewater disposal shall be by connection to the public sewer. 22. Obtain sewer connection permits from the Public Works Department prior to hooking up to the public sewer. 23. The property owner shall enter into an agreement, acceptable to the City Attorney, agreeing to participate in the formation of an assessment district for drainage and related improvements intended to mitigate flooding in the Amapoa/Tecorida drainage area and in those areas impacted by that drainage. 24. Participate in eliminating a portion of the flood hazard to the property by posting a performance security with the City to be used for a drainage improvement project for channelizing the out- flow from Atascadero Lake to Atascadero Creek. In the event that a fugure assessment district is formed for the area drainage im- provements that include this project, then credit in the amount of the deposit will be applied towards final apportionment of the assessment if allowed by the assessment district proceedings. This shall appear as a note on the final map. 25. Offer a 15 foot wide drainage easement along rear lot lines of Lot 1 through 5. Said easement will be consented to but rejected without prejudice by the City. 26. Provide drainage easements (and/or drainage releases) from points of concentration of stormwater leaving the project boundary through adjoining properties to the nearest natural watercourse as approved by the Public Works Department. 27. Grading and drainage plans prepared by a registered civil engineer must be submitted to and approved by the Community Development and Public Works Departments prior to recording the final map. 28. All utilities (including cable TV, telephone, and electricity) ex- tended to each of the new lots shall be installed underground. Said utilities shall be installed prior to recording the final map. 29 . A final map drawn in substantial conformance with the approved tentative map and in compliance with all conditions set forth herein shall be submitted for review and approval in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City Lot Division Ordinance prior to recordation. a. Monuments shall be set at all new property corners created and a registered civil engineer or licensed land surveyor shall indicate, by certificate on the final map, that corners have been set or shall be set by a date specific and that 9 Tentative Tract Map 4-87 (Michael Hawkins/Cuesta Engineering) they will be sufficient to enable the survey to be retraced. Is b. A recently updated preliminary title report shall be submit- ted for review in conjunction with the processing of the final map. C. A preliminary guarantee shall be submitted for review in con- junction with the processing of the final map. 30. Approval of this tentative parcel map shall expire two years from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted pursuant to a written request prior to the expiration date. • 0 EXHIBIT D - Tentative Tract Map 4-87 Conditions of Approval (R E V I S E D) April 7, 1987 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. Water shall be obtained from the Atascadero Mutual Water Company and water lines shall exist at the frontage of each parcel or its public utility easement prior to recordation of the final map. 2. All existing and proposed utility easements, pipelines and other easements are to be shown on the final map. If there are other building or other restrictions related to the easements, they shall be noted on the final map. 3. Grading, drainage, and erosion control plans, prepared by a regis- tered civil engineer , shall be submitted for review and approval by the Community Development and Public Works Departments prior to recording the final map. 4. Drainage work and facilities shall be constructed to City stand- ards prior to recording a final map. 5. Prior to recording the final map a soils investigation (as re- quired by the Map Act) shall be submitted, recommending corrective action which will prevent structural damage to each structure pro- posed to be constructed in the area where soils problems may exist. The date of such reports, the name of the engineer making the report, and the location where the reports are on file shall be noted on the final map. 6. Road improvement plans prepared by a registered civil engineer must be submitted to and approved by the Public Works Department prior to recording the final map. 7. Construction of road improvements shall be completed prior to re- cording the final map, and shall include paving of the entire road and cul-de-sac as shown on the tentative map. 8. Construct an Atascadero City standard cul-de-sac at the terminus of the new road serving the tract. 9. Road improvements shall be to the following standards: City-accepted road: 1. 20 foot wide AC traveled way 2. 24 foot wide road bed 3. Minimum 110 foot centerline radius 4. 40 foot wide right-of-way Tentative Tract Ma$04-87 (Michael Hawkins/Cues Engineering) 10 . All road grading shall be completed prior to recording the final map. 11. An irrevocable offer of dedication to the City of Atascadero for the following right-of-way for future road purposes shall be made and noted on the final map: Street name: Atascadero Avenue Limits: Property frontage Minimum width: Thirty (30) feet from centerline Street name: Unnamed Limits: From Atascadero Avenue to terminus of cul-de-sac Minimum width: 40 foot right-of-way with 48 foot cul-de-sac radius and 20 foot corner rounding at intersection 12. Install all street signs, traffic delineation devices, warning and regulatory signs, guardrail, barricades, and other similar devices where required by the Public Works Director. Signs shall be in conformance with the Public Works Department standards and the rent State of California uniform sign chart. Installation of traffic devices shall be subject to review and modifications after construction. 13. The property owner shall enter into an agreement, acceptable to the City Attorney, agreeing to install sidewalks along the entire frontage of the property along Atascadero Avenue to City standard as may be deemed necessary by a sidewalk needs assessment. 14. An offer of dedication to the public for the Public Utilities Easement shall be made. 15. All offers of dedication shall be completed and recorded prior to or simultaneously to recording the final map. 16 . A City standard fire hydrant shall be installed at the frontage of proposed lot #3 prior to recording the final map. 17. The fire hydrant located at the intersection of Portola Road and Atascadero Avenue shall be upgraded to City standards. 18 . A name for the future road shall be selected and presented to the Planning Commission for approval. Said name shall then appear on the road on the final map. 19. Obtain an encroachment permit from the City of Atascadero. Sign an Inspection Agreement guaranteeing that the work will be done and inspections paid for , prior to issuance of a building permit, and construct improvements as directed by the Encroachment Permit, prior to recording the final map. 2 Tentative Tract MapR 87 (Michael Hawkins/Cues Engineering) 20 . Plan and profile drawings of proposed individual driveways, drive- way easements and private roads shall be submitted for approval by the Community Development and Public Works Departments in order to determine average grade and appropriate improvement requirements. This shall appear as a note on the final map. 21. Wastewater disposal shall be by connection to the public sewer . 22. Obtain sewer connection permits from the Public Works Department prior to hooking up to the public sewer . 23. Offer a 15 foot wide drainage easement along rear lot lines of Lot 1 through 5. Said easement will be consented to but rejected without prejudice by the City. 24. Provide a $500 downstream improvement fee as a contribution toward the required downstream drainage improvements. 25. Grading and drainage plans prepared by a registered civil engineer must be submitted to and approved by the Community Development and Public Works Departments prior to recording the final map. 26. All utilities (including cable TV, telephone, and electricity) ex- tended to each of the new lots shall be installed underground. Said utilities shall be installed prior to recording the final map. 27. A final map drawn in substantial conformance with the approved tentative map and in compliance with all conditions set forth herein shall be submitted for review and approval in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City Lot Division Ordinance prior to recordation. a. Monuments shall be set at all new property corners created and a registered civil engineer or licensed land surveyor shall indicate, by certificate on the final map, that corners have been set or shall be set by a date specific and that they will be sufficient to enable the survey to be retraced. b. A recently updated preliminary title report shall be submit- ted for review in conjunction with the processing of the final map. C. A preliminary guarantee shall be submitted for review in con- junction with the processing of the final map. 28. Approval of this tentative parcel map shall expire two years from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted pursuant to a written request prior to the expiration date. 29. A twenty-five foot side setback shall be established for Lots 5 and 10 along Atascadero Avenue. Said setback shall be delineated on the final map. 3 Minutes - Planning Commission - April 7 , 1987 ere was further discussion concerning an equitable agreemen being reached after a sidewalk study is completed. It was note that in this particular area there was a limited amount of future evelopment. Mr. En en added that when the density in this neighbor od was re- cently hanged, one of the primary concerns of the nei hors had been the need or sidewalks. Mr. Sensibaugh proposed an al ernative simi- lar to wha Public Works uses for detention basins w ch involves pay- ing a fixed ount for improvements which goes into a sinking fund. Mr. Baumberger ated that the applicants would be in favor of a solution propose by Mr. Sensibaugh rather t n having a lien placed against their prop e ty. Commissioner Copelan a ressed concern tha these lots are too long and narrow for a adequa building sites. MOTION: By Commissioner Co elan to ap rove Parcel Map 3-87 subject to the findings and onditi s of approval with the exception of Condition #12 whic is be deleted; seconded by Commis- sioner Nolan. Commissioner Michielss n m ved to amend the motion to modify condition #11 to d: . . sidewalk needs analysis. How- ever, the money sha not be -ailed forth until a minimum 51% of the property ow ers in the\ benefit assessment district have agreed to p ticipate, or i some other method is ar- ranged whereby 1% or more of the roperty owners will parti- cipate in the ost and installation f the sidewalk. Commis- sioner Nolan seconded the amendment t the motion. There was further iscussion concerning 51% of th land area as op- posed to 51% o the property owners. Mr. Sensib ugh stated that an override of a p test is based on land area and not rontage. Com ssioner Michielssen further amended his motion to re- fl ct 51% of the land area instead of 51% of \the property vers. Commissioner Nolan seconded the amendment. Motion to the amendment passed with a 3: 2 vote with ommis- sioners Copelan and Lopez-Balbontin dissenting. Motion to approve Tentative Parcel Map 3-87 with the elimi - tion of condition #12 and amendment to condition #11 passe 4: 1 with Commissioner Lopez-Balbontin dissenting. 4. Tentative Tract Map 4-87 : Request initiated by Michael Hawkins (Cuesta Engineering) to allow subdivision of one parcel containing 4.93 acres into ten lots con- taining between 20 ,100 square feet and 24 ,720 square feet each. Subject property is located at 9240 Atascadero Avenue (Lot 2,� Block 12, Atascadero Colony) . 7 Minutes - Planning Commission - April 7 , 1987 Commissioner Michielssen stepped down from the Commission due to a possible conflict of interest. In presenting the staff report, Mr. DeCamp noted that conditions #23 and #24 be deleted as they are covered by ordinance and need not be noted on the map. He suggested that the wording for condition #13 referring to the sidewalk requirement be amended as reflected in the previous motion (TPM 3-87/Schultz) . Chairman Bond stated this request meets all of the findings and criteria, however, he expressed concern that the street area was being used as part of the square footage for the proposed lots. He discussed the net versus gross acreage issue and his feelings that the map still has to be accepted by the City, to which Mr. DeCamp responded that the proposed street would meet City standards but that there is no requirement that the City accept the road for dedication. There was discussion concerning the need for the 20,000 square foot lot issue to be reviewed during the General Plan update. John Falkenstien, agent for the applicant, stated he is in favor of the amended wording on the sidewalk condition as previously approved by the Commission. With regard to condition #19, Mr. Falkenstien stated he would like the wording "curb and gutter agreement" deleted as there is no requirement for such. Mr. DeCamp stated there was no 0 problem with this deletion. Mr . Falkenstien further addressed condi- tion #26 relating to drainage easements stating that the site is a gently sloping one and that everything drains to the rear. He felt that this site does not have a drainage impact on adjacent properties and explained how the drainage on the different lots drains off the property. Discussion ensued. Mr. Sensibaugh offered a solution in which a $500 detention basin fee could be utilized and applied to downstream improvements. Mr. Falkenstien indicated his agreement to such a compromise. Mr. Falkenstien spoke on the lot size issue with regard to the owner- ship from the centerline of the street to the property. Mr. Gulliver, 9310 Atascadero Avenue, explained difficulties he had in receiving hearing notice since his name was not listed on the assessor rolls. He addressed the drainage issue and stated there is a drainage problem in this area and noted he was not sure whether he approved of the land division request. Jane Smith talked about the continued reduction of lot sizes in this area and expressed her concern with the drainage problems. Dennis Lockridge felt the lot definitely needs to be developed and commented on how this particular application has changed since it first came before the Commission over a year ago. Mr. DeCamp pointed out that Lots 5 and 10 (corner lots) front on the new street with side setbacks along Atascadero Avenue and noted that the Ordinance requires a ten foot minimum setback on a corner lot on the street side. However , because of the other development along the 8 Minutes - Planning Commission - April 7 , 1987 street being set back at 25 feet, and the fact that the school i directly across the street, he asked that a condition be imposed that would require a 25 foot setback along the frontage and side of Lots 5 and 10 along the new street and along Atascadero Avenue and that that setback be shown on the final map. Chairman Bond felt that individual property owners should not be re- quired to put in sidewalks until the school puts in a sidewalk since the school takes up two-thirds of the frontage on Atascadero Avenue and added some additional comments on the sidewalk issue. In response to question from Commissioner Nolan regarding the reword- ing of condition #26, Mr. Sensibaugh stated the applicant should give $500 towards downstream drainage improvements above and beyond the normal drainage fees for this area in lieu of a offsite easements. Commissioner Lopez-Balbontin stated that sidewalks will be needed in that area and there should be some sort of guarantee that the develop- ers will participate in the cost of providing sidewalks. He did not feel that the amended condition on sidewalks in the previous item was adequate. MOTION: By Commissioner Lopez-Balbontin to approve Tentative Tract 4-87 subject to the findings and conditions contained in the staff report with the following modifications: deletion of conditions #23 and #24 addition of condition #31 (pertaining to side setbacks) - amendment to condition #26 The motion passed 3 :1 with a roll call vote; Chairman Bond dissenting. Commissioner Michielssen took his seat back on the Commission. irman Bond called a recess at 11: 05 p.m. ; meeting reco ned at 11: .m. 5. Tentative cel Ma 5-87 : Request initia d by Robert S. Fisher to low subdivision of one parcel containing 66 acres into thr lots containing 0 . 5 acres, . 0. 5 acres, and 0 . 66 a es. Subjec property is located at 8925 Atascadero Avenue (Parce of X76-280) . Mr. DeCamp presented the sta repo recommending conditional approv- al, but noting condition 8 should be leted as it is already cov- ered by ordinance. In response to estion from Commissioner Lopez-B ontin, Mr . Decamp responded At the 16 foot road width is adequate fo Fire Department fpoparatu$s. Mr. DeCamp pointed out that the Fire Departm has asked the installation of a new fire hydrant at the ante ction of* Atai�',c'adero Avenue and the new accessway to the proposed lots hich � ill provide them with additional fire protection throughout the a 9 -'�7A M E M O R A N D U M TO: City Council April 28, 1987 VIA: Michael Shelton, City Manager FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director 4� SUBJECT: Tentative Parcel Map 5-87 LOCATION: 8925 Atascadero Avenue (Parcel A of CO 76-280) APPLICANT: Robert S. Fisher REQUEST: Subdivision of one parcel containing 1. 66 acres into three lots containing 0. 5 acres, 0. 5 acres and 0. 66 acres. BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on April 7, 1987 • concerning the above-referenced subject, approving the land division request on a 3 : 2 vote subject to the findings and conditions contained in the attached staff report with deletion of Condition #18 (which is already covered by ordinance) . Robert Fisher, applicant, noted he was in agreement with the staff recommendation. Comments were heard by Dennis Lockridge and Dave Crawford opposing the proposed lot split because of potential flooding and drainage problems as well as problems associated with flag lot developments. There was discussion among the Commission relative to fire require- ments, drainage requirements, and road widening. No one else spoke on the matter . RECOMMENDATION: Approval subject to the Planning Commission' s recommended findings and conditions of approval. HE:ps • ATTACHMENTS: Staff Report - April 7 , 1987 Revised Conditions of Approval cc: Robert Fisher City of Atascadero Item: C.5 • STAFF REPORT FOR: Planning Commission Meeting Date: April 7, 1987 BY: ��Steven L. DeCamp, Senior Planner File No: TPM 5-87 Project Address: 8925 Atascadero Avenue (Parcel A of CO-76-280) SUBJECT: Subdivision of one parcel containing 1.66 acres into three (3) lots containing 0. 5 acres, 0. 5 acres, and 0.66 acres. BACKGROUND: Notice of public hearing was published in the Atascadero News on Fri- day, March 27, 1987 . All property owners of record located within 300 feet of the subject property were also notified on that date. A. SITUATION AND FACTS: 1. Applicant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Robert S. Fisher • 2. Representative. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Robert S. Fisher 3. Site Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1.66 acres 4. Zoning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .RSF-X 5. Existing Use. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Parcel 1 contains a single- family dwelling 6. Adjacent Zoning. . . . . . . . . . .North: RSF-X South: RSF-X East: RSF-X West: RSF-X 7. General Plan Designation. . . . .High Density 8. Environmental Status. . . . . . . . .Negative Declaration posted February 23, 1987 B. ANALYSIS: The application before the Commission proposes the subdivision of one parcel containing 1. 66 acres into three (3) parcels containing 0. 5 acres, 0. 5 acres, and 0 . 66 acres. The property proposed for subdi- vision is located in an RSF-X zoning district. The minimum lot sizE in this zone is 0. 5 acres where sewers are not available and 20 ,000 square feet where sewers are available. 0 0 Staff Report - TPM 5-87 8925 Atascadero Ave. (Fisher) Page Two Analysis - Cont'd The subject property currently contains a single family residence on Parcel 1. Proposed Parcels 2 and 3 are vacant. The new lots being created are located behind the existing dwelling. Access to these rear lots will be by easement crossing the front lot. This easement will also serve as a Public Utilities Easement allowing the rear lots to be connected to existing utilities in Atascadero Avenue. The area surrounding the subject parcel was the subject of recent Gen- eral Plan and Zoning Ordinance amendments allowing for the establish- ment of one-half acre and 20 ,000 square foot lots. The proposal be- fore the Commission is in conformance with the new General Plan and Zoning Ordinance provisions. Staff believes that the type and density of development proposed is apropriate for the neighborhood. C. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends conditional approval of Tentative Parcel Map 5-87 based on the Findings in Exhibit D and the Conditions of Approval in Exhibit E. SLD:ph Attachments: Exhibit A - Location and Zoning Map Exhibit B - Tentative Parcel Map Exhibit C - Parcel Map Detail Exhibit D - Findings for Approval Exhibit E - Conditions of Approval ty Q NilF F - ILL♦ J , Rf M F M (pp o AV/ EL±ooA t E / / -?RS -4- F tp i' E . ,1/ • c°MJ a . O f J /1 `� ro , L 4S co y� CQ/stile R l CT - C R` 4 -` 0 0 .� ASC49EAO PJ SIZE P ,"/ P /' P / AVE y 41 VIEW / Z � t L(FH� o t/ � o ArvE� L( RS R3f•X( H) _ 1 R S � „ � � fl Totir�: Pav�dl Mal' n W D' L L k 71s� � s i PM 5- 87 V W o cc d Y U d 0 co t t 7" IL Liz , a Z t� t: O ? i Z J' ZO Z S WLLI cc sa z IDIDl O £� af, r ° a o 341 s i n Iz i� ,4•o5t aoaat 7L.t5,i U).1?aka si,ot.Cs1 f+Il,99o�Y apGoCS� N It•1'IZ ��7'49� N 05 0 '= d•�`� L; �'$�. V U +� Ircc n r •4z �"� i W Y I W cc CC a ,.4t,ou 0. � W� $�WjaId.Ot.e-t.t5N (dl,t4'ttC �,GL.Cc�IIspN<I^ Q fi° n a m 3 ; ZrA Z n` y k a 8 fl ° �w Z 1 I t p pi A i. L 1L S y1 �j .S.d t4 y 19L n. 'SL. ° Y J ' I = • 'C CL ��:r+'• ' C Qr >i i Ex�� t31 i G 1�arcw� Mar Da,4--all t CPA 5--,e7 M:: ,Mx M M v v M z n M O n e _ u a Y / � _s m `\ D vco o/ r.? X 0 �W d�/ " �Q m - M ►-r r O m ay v o y / a -33 O o6` - _- --_ - - - D �\ m �_1`0 M,--- 17, '--al, \ \� a W o 0 -i o an mo \ Am v �\ a \\ g 4 T � QQ` G� O G PRELIMINARY MASTER PLAN FOR w ROBERT &- WENDY FISHER 8925 ATASCADERO AVE. 1 MAR. '87 EXHIBIT D - Findings for Approval TPM 5-87 (Fisher) April 7, 1987 FINDINGS: 1. The creation of these parcels conforms to the Zoning Ordinance and the General Plan. 2. The creation of these parcels, in conformance with the recommended Conditions of Approval, will not have a significant adverse effect upon the environment. The Negative Declaration prepared for the project is adequate. 3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development pro- posed. 4. The site is physically suitable for the density of development proposed. 5. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish and wildlife of their habitat. 6. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvement will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision; or that substantially equivalent alternate easements are provided. 7. The proposed subdivision complies with Section 66474. 6 of the State Subdivision Map Act as to methods of handling and discharge of waste. EXHIBIT E - Conditions of Approval TPM 5-87 (Fisher) April 7 , 1987 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. Water shall be obtained from the Atascadero Mutual ua Water Company and water lines shall exist at the frontage of each parcel or its public utility easement prior to recordation of the final map. 2. All existing and proposed utility easements, pipelines and other easements are to be shown on the final map. If there are other building or other restrictions related to the easements, they shall be noted on the final map. 3. Grading, drainage, and erosion control plans, prepared by a reg- istered civil engineer , shall be submitted for review and approval by the Community Development and Public Works Departments prior to recording the final map. 4. Drainage work and facilities shall be constructed to City of Atas- cadero standards prior to recording a final map. 5. Wastewater disposal shall be by connection to the public sewer. ! 6. Obtain sewer connection permits from the Public Works Department prior to hooking up to the public sewer. 7. A sewer annexation fee for the newly created parcels shall be paid prior to recording the final map. 8. A sewer connection fee for each single family lot shall be due in addition to usual connection, tap-in, and installation fees prior to issuance of building permits. 9. Provide sanitary sewer easements to the existing sewer easement at a size and location (s) acceptable to the City Engineer. 10. A new fire hydrant shall be installed to City standards at the intersection of the private road and Atascadero Avenue. 11. Obtain an encroachment permit from the City of Atascadero and con- struct a City Standard drive approach as directed by the encroach- ment permit prior to recording the final map. 12. Plan and profile drawings of proposed individual driveways, drive- way easements and private roads shall be submitted for approval by the Community Development and Public Works Departments in order to determine average grade and appropriate improvement requirements. 0 0 Conditions of Approval TPM 5-87 (Fisher) Page Two 13. Road improvements to the private road shall be to the following standard and shall be completed prior to recording the final map: a. 16 foot wide all-weather traveled way. b. 20 foot wide graded road bed. 14. A road maintenance agreement, in a form acceptable to the City Attorney, shall be recorded with the deed to each parcel at the time it is first conveyed, and a note to this effect shall be placed on the final map. 15. An irrevocable offer of dedication to the City of Atascadero for the following right-of-way for future road purposes shall be made and noted on the final map: Street Name: Atascadero Avenue Limits: Entire frontage of subject property Minimum Width: 30 feet from the centerline 16. An offer of dedication to the public for the Public Utilities Easements shall be made. 17. All offers of dedication shall be completed and recorded prior to or simultaneously to recording the final map. 18. Participate in eliminating a portion of the flood hazard to the property by posting a performance security with the City to be used for a drainage improvement project for channelizing the out- flow from Atascadero Lake to Atascadero Creek. In the event that a future assessment district is formed for the area drainage im- provements that include this project, then credit in the amount of the deposit will be applied towards final apportionment of the assessment if allowed by the assessment district proceedings. This shall appear as a note on the final map. 19. A final map drawn in substantial conformance with the approved tentative map and in compliance with all conditions set forth herein shall be submitted for review and approval in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City Lot Division Ordinance prior to recordation. a. Monuments shall be set at all new property corners created and a registered civil engineer or licensed land surveyor shall indicate, by certificate on the final map, that corners have been set or shall be set by a date specific and that they will be sufficient to enable the survey to be retraced. Conditions of Approval TPM 5-87 (Fisher) Page Three b. A recently updated preliminary title report shall be sub- mitted for review in conjunction with the processing of the final map. C. A preliminary subdivision guarantee shall be submitted for review in conjunction with the processing of the final map. 20. Approval of this tentative parcel map shall expire two years from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted pursuant to a written request prior to the expiration date. 0 EXHIBIT E - Conditions of Approval (R E V I S E D) TPM 5-87 (Fisher) April 7, 1987 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. Water shall be obtained from the Atascadero Mutual Water Company and water lines shall exist at the frontage of each parcel or its public utility easement prior to recordation of the final map. 2. All existing and proposed utility easements, pipelines and other easements are to be shown on the final map. If there are other building or other restrictions related to the easements, they shall be noted on the final map. 3. Grading, drainage, and erosion control plans, prepared by a reg- istered civil engineer , shall be submitted for review and approval by the Community Development and Public Works Departments prior to recording the final map. 4. Drainage work and facilities shall be constructed to City of Atas- cadero standards prior to recording a final map. 5. Wastewater disposal shall be by connection to the public sewer . 6. Obtain sewer connection permits from the Public Works Department prior to hooking up to the public sewer. 7. A sewer annexation fee for the newly created parcels shall be paid prior to recording the final map. 8. A sewer connection fee for each single family lot shall be due in addition to usual connection, tap-in, and installation fees prior to issuance of building permits. 9. Provide sanitary sewer easements to the existing sewer easement at a size and location(s) acceptable to the City Engineer. 10 . A new fire hydrant shall be installed to City standards at the intersection of the private road and Atascadero Avenue. 11. Obtain an encroachment permit from the City of Atascadero and con- struct a City Standard drive approach as directedbythe encroach- ment permit prior to recording the final map. 12. Plan and profile drawings of proposed individual driveways, drive- way easements and private roads shall be submitted for approval by the Community Development and Public Works Departments in order to determine average grade and appropriate improvement requirements. 0 Conditions of Approval TPM 5-87 (Fisher) Page Two 13. Road improvements to the private road shall be to the following standard and shall be completed prior to recording the final map: a. 16 foot wide all-weather traveled way. b. 20 foot wide graded road bed. 14. A road maintenance agreement, in a form acceptable to the City Attorney, shall be recorded with the deed to each parcel at the time it is first conveyed, and a note to this effect shall be placed on the final map. 15. An irrevocable offer of dedication to the City of Atascadero for the following right-of-way for future road purposes shall be made and noted on the final map: Street Name: Atascadero Avenue Limits: Entire frontage of subject property Minimum Width: 30 feet from the centerline 16. An offer of dedication to the public for the Public Utilities Easements shall be made. 17. All offers of dedication shall be completed and recorded prior to or simultaneously to recording the final map. 18. A final map drawn in substantial conformance with the approved tentative map and in compliance with all conditions set forth herein shall be submitted for review and approval in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City Lot Division Ordinance prior to recordation. a. Monuments shall be set at all new property corners created and a registered civil engineer or licensed land surveyor shall indicate, by certificate on the final map, that corners have been set or shall be set by a date specific and that they will be sufficient to enable the survey to be retraced. Conditions of Approval TPM 5-87 (Fisher) Page Three b. A recently updated preliminary title report shall be sub- mitted for review in conjunction with the processing of the final map. C. A preliminary subdivision guarantee shall be submitted for review in conjunction with the processing of the final map. 19. Approval of this tentative parcel map shall expire two years from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted pursuant to a written request prior to the expiration date. • M E M O R A N D U M TO: City Council April 28 , 1987 VIA: Michael Shelton, City Manager FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director . SUBJECT: Acceptance of Final Parcel Map 4-86 (AT 86-015) LOCATION: 8855 and 8905 San Pedro Road APPLICANT: Jim Cassera (Cuesta Engineering) On April 28 , 1986 , the City Council approved Parcel Map 4-86 subject to certain conditions and in concurrence with the recom- mendation of the Planning Commission. The required conditions have been complied with, and the final map is recommended for approval. HE:ps cc: Jim Cassera Cuesta Engineering � ExN-If3� e a � Zaz�Q� >�3o�F Sys �F"_��OJ`IGG �l�, V"GCGI /Vla� Q. zz W o oQa V 'b tido � oQ a Z a 2 oN�oSz 4�i �Q�t?r VII w 3� Iq 2 r vo a3 2 ZE Z3 •o tL 0 i W ` Q m 2 ion m Z v bb p W �4\ C / n� N Nin IT ' •s O ' ` _ S Zt � o• Ji p o' J �\ ' I Q \\� p R.12 h g \ 14 .��•F O ��W O W 2 r1l-7NJay • M E M O R A N D U M TO: City Council April 28 , 1987 VIA: Michael Shelton, City Manager j" . FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director Wx,, SUBJECT: Acceptance of Final Parcel Map 25-86 (AT 86-202) LOCATION: 8375 Portola Road APPLICANT: William Wright (North Coast Engineering) On October 13, 1986 the City Council approved Parcel Map 25-86 , • subject to certain conditions and in concurrence with the recom- mendation of the Planning Commission. The required conditions have been complied with, and the final map is recommended for approval. HE:ps cc: William Wright North Coast Engineering IT D TENY PA2c.OL MAC snip V A•58 ' N/S"i2�'� � r 30Zi r 1 1 � ' e 1-9 N V _ ta o w ' 7 e li uputji Z olo Ul ----- y m°m-c � rtR', - ���� � cum �' n ti• ° mem � �cu �� rny��'°� c�- •yoo � 50 _._.. ----- ay m �� � amA ri, ol Hy c od�1a m3oom sc�„ th g — N, rri omoo 6 y 3 -'A • M E M O R A N D U M TO: City Council April 28 , 1987 VIA: Michael Shelton, City Manager 1��'- FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director 1-�& SUBJECT: Acceptance of Final Lot Line Adjustment 5-86 LOCATION: 4685 Lobos APPLICANT: Ruth Riggs/Wayne & Donna Watkins (Twin Cities Eng. ) On October 13, 1986 , the City Council approved Lot Line Adjust- ment 5-86 subject to certain conditions and in concurrence with the recommendation of the Planning Commission. The required con- ditions have been complied with and the final map is recommended for approval. HE:ps cc: Ruth Riggs Wayne and Donna Watkins Twin Cities Engineering • F c� n/4 ' s 4 � N 2400 4 o ti a'\mom � _�o� � � mV t``ma�• � dea ```,`•/ ���� � Q (` 3 P •� y Ef mos. LA a N r K rn a m p \p 7 ! r1h #rte _ \ r 191 1979 P R O C L A M A T I O N BE KIND TO ANIMALS WEEK MAY 3 9, 1987 WHEREAS , we have been endowed not only with the bless- ings and benefits of our animal friends, who give us compan- ionship and great pleasure in our daily lives, but also with a firm responsibility to protect these fellow creatures with which we share the earth from need , pain , fear , and suffering ; and WHEREAS , we recognize that teaching attitudes of kindness • consideration and respect for all living things through humane education in the schools and the community helps to provide the basic values on which a humane and civilized society is built; and WHEREAS , the people in the City of Atascadero are deeply indebted to their animal care and control agencies for their invaluable contribution in caring for lost and unwanted ani- mals , instilling humane values in our children through humane education programs , and promoting a true working spirit of kindness and consideration for animals in the minds- and hearts of all people ; and WHEREAS, May 3-9 , 1987 has been designated as the annual week to observe the philosophy of kindness to animals . THEREFORE, I Marjorie R. Mackey , Mayor of the City of Atascadero, do hereby proclaim the week of May 3 - 9 , 1987 as "BE KIND TO ANIMALS WEEK" , and encourage all citizens to increase their awareness in kindness to animals. MARJORIE R. MACKEY MAYOR M ' April 28 , 1987 f J M E M O R A N D U M • TO: City Council April 28, 1987 VIA: Michael Shelton, City ManagerAl_ FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director1 SUBJECT: Zone Change 1-87 LOCATION: 9385 Vista Bonita APPLICANT: Robert and Patricia Nimmo (Michael Yeomans) REQUEST: To revise the existing zoning from RSF-Z (Residential Single Family, 1 1/2 to 2 1/2 acre minimum lot size) to RSF-Z (PD7) (Residential Single Family with a Planned Dev- elopment overlay providing for a small lot subdivision) . BACKGROUND: • On April 7, 1987 the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the above-referenced subject. Upon review, the Commission, on a 5 :0 vote, recommended approval of the zone change request as outlined in the attached staff report. There was brief discussion and public tes- timony as reflected in the attached minutes excerpt. RECOMMENDATION: Approval of Planning Commission' s recommendation for Zone Change 1-87 by (1) reading by title only and (2) approving Ordinance No. 151, first reading. HE:ps ATTACHMENTS: Staff Report - April 7, 1987 Minutes Excerpt - April 7, 1987 Ordinance No. 151 cc: Robert & Patricia Nimmo Michael Yeomans • • Zone Change 1-87 (Yeomans/Ijimmo) City of Atascadero Item: C. 6a STAFF REPORT FOR: Planning Commission Meeting Date: 7/7/87 BY: Joel Moses, Associate Planner File No: ZC 1-87 Project Address: 9385 Vista Bonita SUBJECT: Request to revise the existing zoning from RSF-Z (Residential Single Family, 1 1/2 to 2 1/2 acre minimum lot size) to RSF-Z (PD7) (Residen- tial Single Family with a Planned Development overlay providing for a small lot subdivision) . BACKGROUND: The applicants have applied for two coinciding planning approvals: a zone change to allow for a planned development overlay for a small lot subdivision and a tract map to implement the planned development over- lay through a tract map. Notice of public hearing was published in the AtascVero News on Fri- day, March 27, 1987. All property owners of record located within 300 feet of the subject property were also notified on that date. A. LOCATION: 9385 Vista Bonita (Lots 6,7, and 10 thru 15, Tract 5) B. SITUATION AND FACTS: 1. Request. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .To revise the existing RSF-Z zoning by adding a Planned Dev- elopment Overlay (PD7) zoning designation. The PD overlay would allow for a small lot subdivision. 2. Applicants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Robert and Patricia Nimmo/ Michael Yeomans 3. Site Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6. 98 acres 4. Streets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Vista Bonita 5. Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .RSF-Z 6. Existing Use. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Vacant 1 0 9 Zone Change 1-87 (Yeomans/Nimmo) 7. Adjacent Zoning and Use. . . . . .North: County, golf course South: RSF-Y, vacant, water tank , residence East: County, golf course West: RSF-Y, residence 8. General Plan Designation. . . . .Low Density Single Family 9. Terrain. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Steeply sloping down to the north 10. Environmental Status. . . . . . . . .Proposed Negative Declaration C. ANALYSIS: The applicant proposes to revise the existing zoning from RSF-Z (Residential Single Family with a minimum lot size varying from 1 1/2 to 2 1/2 acres depending upon specific site criteria). The applicant proposes no change in the existing basic zoning of RSF-Z, but is requesting the addition of a PD (planned develop- ment) overlay. The PD overlay would allow for the resubdivision of the existing eight lots into eight smaller than allowed resi- dential lots and a large lot for permanent open space. The site consists of eight existing residentially zoned parcels that could be developed with homes. The combined acreage for the eight lots is 6. 98 acres. This would be an existing residential density of one unit per 0.86 acres. This would exceed the normal density standard of one unit per 1 1/2 to 2 1/2 acres. The new lots being created for residential use vary in size from 5,520 to 6,750 square feet. The open space lot would contain 4. 94 acres. The General Plan allows for the development of the proposed smal- ler lots. Land Use element Residential Policy #6 (page 62) notes "Smaller lot sizes may be allowed in conjunction with Planned Res- idential Developments. . .provided that overall density within the project is consistent with other density standards. . . " The pro- posed development would not be in conformance with the existing required General Plan or zoning density (1 1/2 to 2 1/2 acres) . But the eight lots exist as nonconforming lots and as a noncon- forming density standard. The proposed location sets some unique questions before the City. The site located on the north side of a prominent land form (Chalk Mountain) provides for spectacular views, but the development will also be visible from a wide area. The impact of normal develop- ment on the hillside could have a large impact if developed under the current zoning. The hill could be "spotted" by residential homes. The applicant' s proposal would concentrate the units into one area on the northeasterly side of the site, thus reducing vis- ual impacts from the project. 2 Zone Change 1-87 (Yeomans/Nimmo) The proposed project also adheres to the City's proposed architec- tural guidelines. The guidelines call for sensitivity to the natural topography. The project is taking advantage of an exist- ing bench and will not grade on sites that have not been graded on. Development on the ungraded end of the site could have an extensive visual impact. The design proposes break-up of the po- tential row effect of the development. The residential units are varied in elevation and are separated. The scale of the struc- tures are compatible with the surroundings. In meeting the guide- lines, the proposed project substantially reduces the potential visual impacts of development if the project is . approved. In reviewing the project, several questions have been raised as to improvements and potential impacts. The site' s steepness has noted potential problems for access design, septic system design, and utilities design. The County and the Public Works Departments have express concern about drainage and sewer service to the site. These problems can be resolved and are currently being worked on with the developer. Public Works has noted that sewer can be ex- tended to the site. The Fire Department has been working to re- solve fire protection questions which have now basically been re- solved. Road improvements and access have been reviewed and deemed adequate. Staff would note that the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance sup- port such developments. The question of public service infra- structure impacts have been reviewed and found to be solveable or nonexistent. The question of lot size is of some concern. How- ever, the applicant has eight existing lots and no density in- crease is being contemplated. The lot sizes as proposed would be adequate for the proposed development' s specific design. D. RECOMMENDATION: Based on the analysis, staff recommends that Zone Change 1-87 as proposed be approved, and establish one specific Planned Develop- ment Overlay for small lot subdivisions. JM:ps ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A - Location Map Exhibit B - Supplemental Development Statement Exhibit C - Design Drawings Exhibit D - Draft Ordinance 3 Zone Change 1-87 (Yeomans/Nimmo) EXHIBIT D Draft Ordinance ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNDIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO AMENDING SECTION MAP NUMBER 19 OF OFFICIAL ZONING MAPS OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO AND AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY KNOWN AS PORTIONS OF LOTS 6, 7, AND ALL OF LOTS 10 THROUGH 15 OF TRACT 5 (ATASCADERO) FROM RSF-Z (RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY - 1 1/2 TO 2 1/2 ACRE MINIMUM LOT SIZE) TO RSF-Z (PD-7) (RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY WITH A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 7) (ZONE CHANGE 1-87: NIMMO/YEOMANS) WHEREAS, the proposed zoning map amendment is consistent with the General Plan as required by Section 65860 of the California Government Code; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendment is in conformance with Section 65800 et seq. of the California Government Code concerning zoning reg- ulations; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendment will not have a significant ad- verse effect upon the environment. A Negative Declaration has been prepared on the project. WHEREAS, the Atascadero Planning Commission held a public hearing on April 7, 1987, and has recommended approval of zoning Ordinance Change 1-87. NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the City .of Atascadero does ordain as follows: Section 1. Council Findings. 1. The proposal is compatible with the surrounding land uses and ex- isting zoning in the area. 2. The proposal is consistent with the General Plan .Land use Map des- ignation for the site and is consistent with other policies of the General Plan. 3. The proposal will not result in any significant adverse environ- mental impacts. The Negative Declaration prepared for the project is adequate. 4. Benefits derived from the overlay zone cannot be reasonably achieved through existing development standards or processing re- quirements. 5. Proposed plans offer certain redeeming features to compensate for 4 Zone Change 1-87 (Yeomans/Nimmo) requested modifications. 6. Modification of development standards or processing requirements is warranted to promote orderly and harmonious development. 7. Modification of development standards or processing requirements will enhance the opportunity to best utilize special character- istics of an area and will have a beneficial effect on the area. Section 2. Zoning Map. Map Number 19 of the Official Zoning Maps of the City of Atasca- dero on file in the City Community Development Department is hereby amended to reclassify portions of Lots 6, 7, and all of Lots 10 through 15 of Tract 5 (Atascadero) as shown on attached Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B" , Site Master Plan, which are hereby made a part of this ordinance by reference. Section 4. Publication. The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published once within fifteen (15) days after its passage in the Atascadero News, a newspaper of general circulation, printed, published and circulated in this City in accordance with Government Code Section 36933; shall cer- tify the adoption of this ordinance; and shall cause this ordinance and certification to be entered in the Book of Ordinances of this City. Section 5. Effective Date. This ordinance shall go into effect and be in full force and ef- fect at 12: 01 a.m. on the thirty-first (31st) day after its passage. On motion by and seconded by the foregoing ordinance is hereby adopted in its en- tirety by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: DATE ADOPTED: BY: MARJORIE MACKEY, Mayor City of Atascadero, California ATTEST: BOYD C. SHARITZ, City Clerk 5 Zone Change 1-87 (Yeomans/Nimmo) APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: MICHAEL SHELTON, City Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: JEFFREY G. JORGENSEN, City Attorney PREPARED BY: HENRY ENGEN Community Development Director 6 • 18 '+ Y. v`• !r,`�o.�Nr SAT AI• ,r '. ,.x .. �� aa!`PO�'\•• • 1),, ��...''�,+ s 5 � . ;� • sc�r t. YS�r1�+YSr2-r i n r:4r•!.':.j�•K{ . .; y 7 •AT%80•ST e c ••r' O+ ..r• 1;c,: \. ,x w/ �1 1 •'� : .•ti _fir .,. • t AT-7E•t13 •= 12-tfh s: • ;`r ; \\ tai Ar-19-23 12-x1 • F - <\� ••� + -.bi "� '- `+ •S � - •. 'i'• 'AT'81-183 .12-Ot !.. ,c �•• !L * �•r �. t AT 81 tS46 S2S•st ••tit•.' 'ti"• IiP +•.+` ,�t �••% •�i�`f r '1. faJ ..; .+ ALVTS70Y DATC f . :•� M r•• !�.\fid' 1�iRn\ •r t•i. 1� •1• ?z 1' • ti >• d s •t f �' .:j, +j► . eP \ .�1r,• % • 1. 3 •:4 to n$• >' f• � i: .F.::.•. -• + • ' > t _t r£x+.it�r ' Af• •'� etf t �M_ ty •.•.y 1•- •may-� •4 ` ••2.. 'a '•..y !)�,"'�"t"••�} . s f 'y .�'�i �': t. •a.a..'1'-•4i' N _ •'3r. �• t •'s .a 1 . � �„a •�•�'v • � ° •"+e+ \4g s' '' .'� '4-•. ;t•`a �i1»r•'f-!".'- < ta. •+':t:•i } a •. : f f y'. , • s '^J r +3, ; vp tb �f, t.} i� Z j+ _ .�• fn. r'y. J .• ''•• �,;. '.y '.t• i r 'a : 1 -•" S 1 +1 Y'it .r �+° o✓ � •`a i �. - .R-K=�'.:• v: ff '�Ys{,•i7se{ to S ,'1� •��_ ,r�t'~ r t" U s r r 7ti�` + a _ 1/ t� •.e .Fjs .�'/. • 't .• wct , _ ..:1' ' r r .r f .[,�}� p7 i a Qy.,,.. V- I •. 34�6 v �M, �• t>ta „° r:..•�y a s :I'1 > .• i. - i T!. f�• ' • w7 Tara u/a r• • +a• zs.; • �Orr .` = Ia d t rt I✓ • SIS :• � - i ` e,t ♦'-"�•e"x `\•• ��, ♦\'v• 9�1 a+ dal i 23 1•ars5. a ... oAtOl• ° S+`ate •i•• S � r 4 � °.•.1 �• S - =wl �.6�S� ri �. ��:•914 ti« loo •G'T' '.,f• th S 31• FZ' RSF to ' •rte, t'. .� •" 13 Ip ,,• _ �Jcr w �t t' p 5' '�:4 'A •'Pe{tl�l���s Vis;1 .wrap, � - � ? .,.. 'i"�'•�. ' • � `- ,. _'�','� �,,•' �� •RMF/� r�'- �;•-•.�•` •• r • '4$ �. a ,etfr t .. n<•.`:'•y.-•aj\: ,'fes ••• ;a: t• - � y o.\ .�' -. ^ `af, a• Pat ' .• � :\iF,r: { • - \fal.^9`'� 2•�y\,.l,LO \ \ 10# ='S 1 s\\' .:•},! ,, . •`/ •• \�J ''. • .. 41+.\'. I•'f•4.\ 1\\� s t-r ^IJ. �f� , .•e•• •'%,t q?. \ P� +-•9` �✓ \d\ - _ X <- C< 1<' b \ •r •,a•., TA dI'' ����'t;�!�re� �•''t+f : ,(� S. 1' • _ - ,..••n ..•. �•°. rte.•.• a*•. I It flu 22 23 2i s, •1.n14a•a••.••a.a••r-%Kti.i.::aw<r sem..-•. _��_..�- -r.' _ \�'-.uea..«W r•...r.J,..1ruv.,wr Rat ar,<x. - c\ 20 't. T?� <m o:.i�orio' %ti.�1 q a.�..r.,•... 14 A 23 a ``J \ Y�^1..t-la -. 4k•..t•fuo.u+a��a•I.t...� 1. 1.r. + EX/4157 A - IGN"WYVG E 1- 257 732)-7 V 15TA C n n(f] -FG 1ZSF•Z TD 25 F-Z(YD• 7) T 11/IMNID �Y :ai1-7 Y✓✓7��IlF� 3 v 9 O �d M m -4 _ z > 4�1 jn .A m m - a m91 V > i 3E '+ ..PK 'v> rA .►45 rM ' o 30 rM �.. " * 4 / fnv a • �e ° � � z . c z� I I � • n PK m� tt Ll E • p I - L -1 n C 1 Iv r r¢ a qp Z�pdZ O Z • L'T�TT P r 7 Z o���n�vcc Spanish Ridge EX141EFT b SITE MA51L t TLM4 by the ZONE GNT1 N6e 1 • b� a� Z - a 93 QS Vl5-TA F��N�T'A Yeomans Growl �;P-z- �s�.z n ' 7) NIVAMD VEDMANS - � , r ' till til AIT g .� , • �I . ► :. � of SUPPLEMENTAL DEVELOPMENT STATEMENT FOR SPANISH RIDGE This application seeks to create an eight unit planned develop- ment of single family homes which we refer' to as Spanish Ridge or Tract 1488. The site is 6.98 acres located on the north face of Chalk Mountain overlooking the Regional Park and Golf Course. Most of the site is quite steep with slopes well in excess of 30% and is covered with native brush, some large oaks and a few pines. The 6.98 acres is currently divided into eight legal lots as the result of the recordation of Tract 5 in August of 1931. This proposal is submitted as an alternative development plan to the construction of eight single family houses ; one each on the existing eight lots. There exist on the eastern portion of this site an area which is flatter and easier to access. This area was once used as a quarry site, see preliminary soils report, and as a result of that activity it has less significant vegetation than the remainder of the site. It is the purpose of this application to employ the planned development overlay zone, as outlined in Atascadero' s existing General Plan and Zoning text, to allow for the construction of the eight single family homes in the area most suitable for development. Although the newly created residential lots would be smaller than those normally found in this existing zoning, the creation of such lots are allowed as part of a planned develop- ment. It should be noted that this application does not seek a density increase. The use of the planned development concept in this application seeks to create a more sensitive development solution in regards to this site. The reasons we feel this plan is a more responsible development are as follows: A) 710 of the site will be preserved as an open space. B) The-access to the development area will be more sensitive to the existing terrain, and less area will be needed to make the access. C) It becomes feasible to bring sanitary sewer to the home- sites . This is preferable to the use of individual septics on the existing hillside. Lam";-I!8[T �s S,771,7-DlfO =K[E C�004LE `C •I•Z-7 1 93 S Ul 5� T3ON IT-n TSS F•Z 7D T�F-27 P D •7 tiliT�'iNIO - `lEL'MAh15 D) By limiting the amount of area to be used for development more of the native vegetation can be preserved. E) By placing the units in the flatter areas of the hillside their visual impact will be decreased. We hope that our planning efforts and design solutions will be accepted by the City of Atascadero in a positive manner. Sincerely, / Michael P. Yeomans 2 g r �. low 0 AIL A � d • .. I mss.. A! -__ = Or 1 [u -- ^ I �� I = at'T z_• .; `?:` co ♦ i- x-r- .. Y z Z rim r. 4 Spanish Ridge �Y/I��C • .�17� DL31G,lt by the ? ' IEG�tIlfiGcC 'I-Y� Yeomans Grow r-S' z -TL SF 7 ' N IMMD - `LDI'O KIS , a n O a A z to M O � � Ir 2i 0 am rn ` T T T ; W r O� _ +r p s a ni T p Up j � A AA�i ngo \ Has p 1. rr 'Mot 00 z�Z n 8 Z. �' n •- f F n R f q a 'r D J Spanish Ridge ' by the Yeomans Group . low Q bw t I Ira rJ CL t ■ 7'. I � 35-0 > ■ a 1 kNg+ ?7 I �-:�•X C 03 3 11 r E 1r G uuii ii�n 1 4 .}! - IL- r. 10 COD 1 lrii' iN nub• 0 Spanish Ridge e by the � R Q Yeomans Group • n IF [Cal IN C 9Fort O � � '�. I i•.n iirin � ,:JTJrTf, ��` ])T.7ZUi._S DJ - SJ7:SaIJJ]'11m x ..- , a a WI , Ir F •� � �• � I �Sj+,T�fm�y ])].1 O CLO .:.a »: ? HBO Bugg r- y� HBO. : I iii) l$3'.'can U� -�]a )fjS1111y Id • 3 r— . )Tl p Spanish Ridge 40h: ; �. • by the nt Yeomans Group a r to M o i! Qi � z t r- 1 or ; Z m p � •a ofµ x p �,�7 "1• I Q -I au V ;C cc Z li• ��r �`T U �' P, 8 ma o ^ Spanish Ridge a by the Yeomans Groups . 8 r' R 76D a- t D D V O mN v nZL Ipi p lP!YP - - spm n o S V J' Q If ^� All r Q r is C ai D ✓Q Sv p ry t.� Z--C::� t. 9 Spanish Ridge 3 *4 o, by the Yeomans Group �: •� ` Z O / t � IRS U4, Z _~ r ' Lam; s � y a co ! � 'I ;. I 1 - TpP a� 1p A ^T ' Z V n _ ri ow o}- 66rn IOS t t I Po rp in c j* D s x tP� nor �r4ki A w f� `F � ►� a -{ z rrpp mp - z� 3 E n i �Z Ir Spanish Ridge � 11 by the 'p Yeomans Groan , 0 0 Minutes - Planning Commission - April 7, 1987 Br 'ef discussion ensued concerning fire requirements. Robert Fisher , applicant, stated his agreement with the re ommenda- tions co tained in the staff report. Dennis Lockr 'dge stated he shares a driveway with the applicant and pointed out at the flag lot will serve four hom when developed. He expressed his trong opposition to this applica on due to compati- bility, flood pro b ms and flag lot development roblems. He urged the Commission to di ourage continued develo ent of flag lots. Dave Crawford, 8575 Port a Road, also sp a in opposition to the lot split stating there are vere drains problems and the road is too narrow. Mr. Fisher stated that the drive will be repaired and a culvert will be placed under the drivew help with the drainage. There was some discussion ncerning t drainage requirements in the area, as well as discuss ' n concerning r d widening. MOTION: By Commissi er Nolan to approve Te tative Parcel Map 5-87 subject t the findings and condition contained in the staff report ith the deletion of condition # seconded by Com- missi er Lopez-Balbontin. Commissio r Copelan asked Mr. Fisher for clarificatio on the dis- tance f m the driveway line to the front of the propert on Parcel 1. She a ressed concern on the close proximity of the propos homes to the riveway due to safety considerations. Motion passed 3 :2 with a roll call vote; Commissioner elan and Chairman Bond dissenting. 6a. Zone Change 1-87 : Request initiated by Robert and Patricia Nimmo (Michael Yeomans) to revise the existing zoning from RSF-Z by adding a Planned Dev- elopment Overlay (PD7) zoning designation. The PD overlay would allow for a small lot subdivision. Subject property is located at 9385 Vista Bonita (Lots 6, 7, and 10 through 15 , Tract 5) . 6b. Tentative Tract Ma 2-87 : Request initiated by Robert and Patricia Nimmo (Michael Yeomans) to allow a residential resubdivision of 8 lots into 9 lots, with eight of the lots varying in size from 5, 520 to 6,750 square feet for residential use and one 4. 94 acre lot for open space. The proposal also includes a request to establish Trifon Garcia Lane as a road name for a proposed private road. Subject property is located at 9385 Vista Bonita (Lots 6 , 7, and 10 through 15 , Tract 5) . 10 Minutes - Planningoommission - April 7 , 1987 It was noted that these two items would be considered simultaneously. Mr. Moses presented the staff reports. 0 Bob Nimmo, applicant, discussed the technical complexities built into this particular site which includes excavations by the Water Company, etc. He thanked the planning and engineering staff for their helpful cooperation in working out the difficulties involved. He provided a brief background on the history of the site. He indicated he had no problems with the conditions imposed for the map. There was some discussion concerning the proposed use for the open space and how that open space will be maintained. It was pointed out that there have been no archaeological finds on the site. Commission- er Lopez-Balbontin noted that the word "slope" should be added to condition #2i of the map. MOTION: By Commissioner Copelan to recommend approval of Zone Change 1-87 to the City Council, and approval of Tentative Tract Map 2-87 subject to the findings and conditions con- tained in the staff report; seconded by Commissioner Nolan; passed unanimously 5:0 with a roll call vote. D. P LIC COMMENT There was o public comment at this time. E. INDIVIDUAL AC ON AND/OR DETERMINATION 1. Planning Come \sion Commissioner Lopez-Balbont' n commente on an earlier remark by Commis- sioner Copelan in that the 3 of t Planning Commission is to con- concern itself with all aspect o planning including traffic and sidewalk considerations. Chairman Bond pointed out a tentia public hazard involving a dan- gerous overhang at an ab Boned gas ation at the corner of Portola and West Front. Chairman Bond asked s ff to respond to conc ns expressed by Commis- sioner Kidwell whic included the status of th "for sale" cars parked at Safeway, statu of Ed' s Garage with an overab dance of cars on the site compared to Mr. Gaughn' s site at Traffic Way, nd what the status is of a former nuisance abatement of junk , miscellan ous appliances, etc. (Morro R0oad - Harden) . Mr. DeCa responded that enforcement is taking place on ongoing basis the Safeway site. With regard to Ed ' s Garage versus the Auto S/hop , Mr . DeCamp noted that Mr . Gaughan had to comply with veral� co itions as a result of Planning Commission approvals whereas d' s G rage has not had any entitlements approved. Concerning Mr . Harde - 11 ORDINANCE NO. 151 0 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO AMENDING SECTION MAP NUMBER 19 OF OFFICIAL ZONING MAPS OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO AND AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY KNOWN AS PORTIONS OF LOTS 6, 7, AND ALL OF LOTS 10 THROUGH 15 OF TRACT 5 (ATASCADERO) FROM RSF-Z (RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY - 1 1/2 TO 2 1/2 ACRE MINIMUM LOT SIZE) TO RSF-Z (PD-7) (RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY WITH A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 7) (ZONE CHANGE 1-87: NIMMO/YEOMANS) WHEREAS, the proposed zoning map amendment is consistent with the General Plan as required by Section 65860 of the California Government Code; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendment is in conformance with Section 65800 et seq. of the California Government Code concerning zoning reg- ulations; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendment will not have a significant ad- verse effect upon the environment. A Negative Declaration has been prepared on the project. WHEREAS, the Atascadero Planning Commission held a public hearing on April 7, 1987, and has recommended approval of Zoning Ordinance Change 1-87. NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Atascadero does ordain as follows: Section 1. Council Findings. 1. The proposal is compatible with the surrounding land uses and ex- isting zoning in the area. 2. The proposal is consistent with the General Plan Land use Map des- ignation for the site and is consistent with other policies of the General Plan. 3. The proposal will not result in any significant adverse environ- mental impacts. The Negative Declaration prepared for the project is adequate. 4. Benefits derived from the overlay zone cannot be reasonably achieved through existing development standards or processing re- quirements. 5. Proposed plans offer certain redeeming features to compensate for requested modifications. Zone Change 1-87 (mans/Nimmo) 0 6. Modification of development standards or processing requirements is warranted to promote orderly and harmonious development. 7. Modification of development standards or processing requirements will enhance the opportunity to best utilize special character- istics of an area and will have a beneficial effect on the area. Section 2. Zoning Map. Map Number 19 of the Official Zoning Maps of the City of Atasca- dero on file in the City Community Development Department is hereby amended to reclassify portions of Lots 6 , 7, and all of Lots 10 through 15 of Tract 5 (Atascadero) as shown on attached Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B" , Site Master Plan, which are hereby made a part of this ordinance by reference. Section 3. Zoning Text Change. Zoning Ordinance Text Change 1-87 is approved to add the following language: 1. Section 9-3.651 is added to the Planned Development Overlay Zones to read as follows: 9-3.651. Establishment of Planned Development Overlay Zone No. 7 (PD7) . The Planned Development Overlay Zone No. 7 is estab- lished as shown on the official zoning maps (Section 9-1.102) . The following development standards are established: a. The Master Plan of Development of the site is approved as shown on Exhibit B which is hereby made a part of this ordi- nance by reference. All construction and development shall be done in conformance with the approved Exhibit. Any modi- fication in density will require a rezoning. Modification of the Master Plan site design may be approved in a manner pre- scribed for a Conditional Use Permit (Section 9-2.109) . b. In approving a Master Plan of Development, the level of pro- cessing for subsequent projects or phases may be reduced to a Plot Plan provided that the Master Plan contain sufficient detail to support such a determination. C. No subsequent Plot Plan, Precise Plan, Conditional Use Per- mit, or Tentative Parcel or Tract Map shall be approved un- less found to be consistent with the approved Master Plan of Development. Any amendment to a Master Plan of Development, including conditions thereof, shall be accomplished as set forth in Subsection (a) of this Section. Section 4. Publication. The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published once within fifteen (15) days after its passage in the Atascadero News, a newspaper of general circulation, printed, published and circulated in this City in accordance with Government Code Section 36933; shall cer- 2 Zone Change 1-87 (mans/Nimmo) • tify the adoption of this ordinance; and shall cause this ordinance and certification to be entered in the Book of Ordinances of this City. Section 5. Effective Date. This ordinance shall go into effect and be in full force and ef- fect at 12:01 a.m. on the thirty-first (31st) day after its passage. On motion by and seconded by the foregoing ordinance is hereby adopted in its en- tirety by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: DATE ADOPTED: BY: MARJORIE MACKEY, Mayor City of Atascadero, California ATTEST: BOYD C. SHARITZ, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: MICHAEL SHELTON, City Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: JEFFREY G. JORGENSEN, City Attorney PREPARED BY: HENRY"Develop Communt Director 3 S 060 �* A W m z 0 33 M rza �` .arn r• r R -• �Lg O p y� qua �na r gm Q A p 0) W (A �� /.. > o••j 'w W m z � � O •'.'QJ.:/!�. ;,fin.%1.. m : 8 C '� �• O i7 zO 6 i z .- m oUP z o z m I z_ u A Omy o° ppt •�zS p L xnF% z �rarr. r O u r A �Vz L E:::D—Z--C==— f uiB IT U/1 Vt-C r_ Spanish Ridg _ Ell . l . f _ by the �s Yeomans Group T z -TL,, Z�n 7) �iL�mJlnl� • wri1�' � , ' ' M E M O R A N D U M TO: City Council April 28, 1987 ' VIA: Michael Shelton, City Manager FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Proposed revisions to South Atascadero General Plan Amendment Environmental Impact Report Study Area BACKGROUND: On October 16 , 1986 , staff solicited proposals for an Environmental Impact Report for the south side of Atascadero in response to four General Plan amendment applications seeking land use changes and ex- tension of urban services. Subsequently, one of the largest land holders (Nimmo/Davis) withdrew their application (see attached) . At their meeting of March 17, 1987, the Planning Commission concurred with staff recommendation for a reduced study area. ANALYSIS: The attached exhibits reflect the land areas which originally sought a General Plan amendment (Exhibit A) and the original City Council ap- proved study area (Exhibit B) . The area proposed to be the revised study area is as indicated in the attached Exhibit D. As noted in the attached letter , the three remaining applicants are proposing a more limited area. Staff and Planning Commission recommend that the study area include properties fronting on Viejo Camino on westerly to Highway 101. RECOMMENDATION: Endorsement of study area reflected on Exhibit D. WHAT'S NEXT: Staff will contact appropriate consultants to revise the work program and fee schedule with the Community Development Director to then make a consultant selection. HE:ps cc: Rex Hendrix ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A - General Plan Amendment Request Exhibit B - Approved General Plan Study Area . Exhibit C - Revised General Plan Amendment Requests Exhibit D - Recommended General Plan Amendment Area March 10 , 1987 Communication - Rex Hendrix February 11, 1987 Communication - Gordon T. Davis • GP ZHd CYcLc X96& 54-jdy arcia,3 IL oft R /16 35 fto w b W f 57. is RSFH) LoN ITS '+'fir -.�4= �„ ,��`�• ,�- _ v ..e. - _- - - - - �r -4523 tz (j) ZAP—SG ..0�✓ ., `) =_ _ - All 111715 n + �SsQ.G'f4tL - 1v L✓ },•" ti,.S .(Y'\.' a rdi llp� 11Z.l494a l- _T' rye :•��.=.+�'[Y.Z+� :�./ \�,�' =:� .I :t-�'e-' 2-4 • ti o All �-- -- - • I •� Iry p / / ij �j� ♦ .ii�q�a� a e a �• / � / r e e e i • � a e t A A t e e A V, 1 Mix, IM \ /\ N A i - 6 e _ ♦ e e e e v • E�C�181 i C i i NA CITY �� O M,T ` rC, MF t b tip o` 1 /7 6 0P r� p �P /� QY OJ 1` VlEjp /Z 76\ E� N SPK(P O CgM,N .JPO o \1, b o� iF _\ 10 / \ a C•��ti t O m \ a 1 4s �o i , o EPO rP cxA►F317` a Ate,Q.L,�w►ah-{' S--vd y Ara i i i i i / • S.I.Li ° o Zi 0110 If—CA 4fN Za \ Cr LO O>�� (7 9 P' / 0r OJ �6 VlEJO / O C4M,Hp P64 C o� \ 10 / a CAMS ¢ < ~O \ m / r z < N 4y, i Ayz _ o a `Qo *P REX HENDRIX P.O . BOX 6062 ATASCADERO , CA 93423 466-0928 March 10, 1987 City of Atascadero Planning Department P.O . Box 747 Atascadero, CA 93422 RE : Urban services line extension request. General Plan Amendment 2E-86 and zone change 17-86 Dear Mr. DeCamp: Mr. Henry Engen requested I address this letter to you. Since Nimmo and Davis have withdrawn their portion of our original application, we hereby are requesting to include only the areas and parcels as delineated on the attached map and as listed below: 1 . Approximately 46 acres bounded by Santa Barbara Rd. , El Camino Real and Freeway 101 2. Approximately 2 acres fronting on El Camino Real, known as Young' s Nursing Home project. 3. Property owned by Frederick fronting on El Camino Real and Viejo Camino . We ask to amend our application to include only these parcels . know.If you need any further information from us, please let me Sincere y, Rex Hendrix RH:dc Encl. �' Ilk- Iq Lo_ �S nom• VI �w =• } / ��(`' i . • ..a s i � : � �l i e 4 v Q w•' •' y e3/It Lr Lr .�.. /\ E-1 cd .,; •- :., � ..iii. .�g ,, �M J - + - - • _ ,. �A - P.O. Box 2400 Atascadero, Ca. 93423 February 11 , 1987 City of Atascadero 6500 Palma Avenue Atascadero, Ca. 93422 Attn: Mr. Henry Engen Community Planning Director Dear Henry: Because of other involvements the Gordon T. Davis Land Company and the Nimmo Family have concluded that pursuing a rezoning and General Plan Amendment of our property on Halcon Road is not appropriate at this time. We request, therefore, that our application for rezoning and General Plan Amendment be withdrawn. Please remit any refundable portion of application fees paid by us to the Gordon T. Davis Land Company at the above address . Your cooperation and courtesy in this matter are very much appreciated. S inc rly 1. Gordon T. Davis Land Company RECEIVED __Z • MEMORANDUM TO: City Council THROUGH: Mike Shelton, City Manager FROM: Paul M. Sensibaugh SUBJECT : Certificates of Acceptance —Resolution 39-87 DATE: April 20, 1987 Recommendation: Staff recommends that Council approve the attached Rsolution authorizing the City Manager and Public Works Director to execute certificates of acceptance on behalf of the City . • Background: On various projects . the City has needed to obtain easements from property owners for construction or right of way purposes . Once the easements are obtained we are required to accept or consent to such deeds or grants pursuant to government code . This can be done, as it has in the past , by resolution on an individual basis . The passage of the attached resolution would establish a new procedure that would save administrative time in the future . Fiscal Impact : This authorization carries no monetary impact , however , there is often a cost involved when acquiring an easement . The cost associated with specific easements will be provided to Council for approval as they occur . • Resolution No. 39-87 • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER AND PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR TO EXECUTE CERTIFICATES OF ACCEPTANCE ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO WHEREAS, deeds or grants conveying an interest in or easement upon real estate to a political corporation or government agency for public purposes shall not be accepted for recordation without the consent of the grantee evidenced by its certificate or resolution of acceptance attached to or printed on the deed or grant pursuant to Government Code section 27281, and WHEREAS, a political corporation or government agency, by a general resolution, may authorize one or more officers or agents to accept and consent to such deeds or grants pursuant to Government Code section 27281; and WHEREAS, if a certificate of acceptance is used, it shall be in substantially the form provided by Government Code section 27281, which is set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein as though fully set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Atascadero that the City Manager and/or the Public Works Director are hereby authorized to accept and consent to deeds or grants conveying any interest in or easement upon real estate to the City of Atascadero, and may execute a certificate of acceptance in substantially the form provided by Exhibit "A" attached to this resolution, pursuant to the authority of Government Code section 27281. PASSED AND ADOPTED at the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Atascadero held 1987 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ADOPTED: RESOLUTION NO. 39-87 Page 2 CITY OF ATASCADERO By MARJORIE R. MACKEY, Mayor ATTEST: BOYD C. SHARITZ, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: JEFFREY G. JORGENSEN, City Attorney APPROVED . AS TO CONTENT. MICHAEL B. SHELTON City Manager CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the deed or grant dated 19 , from to the CITY OF ATASCADERO, a municipal corporation, is hereby accepted by the undersigned officer or agent on behalf of the CITY OF ATASCADERO pursuant to authority conferred by resolution of the City Council of the City of Atascadero adopted on , 1987, and the grantee consents to recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer or agent. Executed on , 19 , at Atascadero, California. CITY OF ATASCADERO By [Title] Exhibit "A" i M E M O R A N D U M DATE: 4/23/87 TO: City Council VIA: Mike Shelton, City Manager FROM: Mike Hick, Fire Chief SUBJECT: Resolution No. 31-87 , Weed Abatement Program Recommendation: It is my recommendation Resolution No. 31-87 , declaring weeds a public nuisance and commencing proceedings for the abatement of said nuisances , be adopted. Background: City Ordinance No. 61 addresses the abatement of weeds, rubbish, and similar materials which constitute a fire hazard. Adoption of Resolution No. 31-87 is the first step in this annual program which requires Council action. The attached Exhibit "A" contains parcel numbers of those parcels which appeared to require weed abatement at the time of the first inspections. Property owners of those parcels will receive written notices of the abatement requirements . Also attached is a weed abatement schedule which indicates the dates of public hearings, printing of legal notices, etc. , required under City Government Code, Chapter 13, Section 39500 . Fiscal Impact : None. 4HKMIKS FIRE CHIEF MH:pg WEED ABATEMENT SCHEDULE 1987 April 6-19 Identify parcels requiring abatement. April 8, 10 , 15 , 17 Legal notices printed in newspaper regarding contractor' s bids . April 28 Council agenda item - Resolution declaring weeds, etc . , a public nuisance. May 1 - May 12 Mail notices to property owners . May 4, 3 : 00 p.m. Open contractor's bids. May 13 Legal notice in newspaper regarding public hearing on appeals . May 26 Council agenda item - Public hearing regarding appeals and awarding of contractor's bids . May 27 Start reinspection of lots for compliance. June 8 Contractor begins abatement of parcels . July 15 Legal notice in newspaper regarding public hearing on abatement costs . July 20 End of abatement of parcels . July 22 Post parcel numbers and charges at City Hall and Fire Station. July 28 Council agenda item - Public hearing regarding appeals on abatement and Council approval of list of parcel numbers and charges for abatement. August 10 Submit parcel numbers and charges to County Tax Assessor. RESOLUTION NO. 31-87 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO DECLARING WEEDS A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND COMMENCING PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ABATEMENT OF SAID NUISANCES The City Council of the City of Atascadero , County of San Luis Obispo, State of California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE as follows : SECTION 1 . That weeds growing or potentially could grow, and rubbish, refuse and dirt upon public and private property hereinafter described, constitute or could constitute a public nuisance and are hereby declared to be such, for the reason that such weeds upon maturity will bear wingy or downy seeds, will attain such a large growth as to become a fire menace when dry, will be otherwise noxious or dangerous, or will constitute or potentially could constitute dry grass, stubble, brush, litter or other flammable material thereby creating a hazard to public health. SECTION 2 . The description of the parcels of lots of private property upon which, or in front of which, said nuisances exist, according to the official Assessment Map of said City of Atascadero, are set in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and hereby incorporated herein by reference as though here fully set forth. SECTION 3 . The City Clerk is hereby ordered and directed to mail written notice of the proposed abatement to all persons owning property described in this resolution in accordance with Section G-13 . 04 of City Ordinance No . 61 . SECTION 4 . The time at which the City Council shall hear and consider all objections or protests to the required removal of said noxious or dangerous weeds , or other flammable material will be at 7 : 30 p.m. on May 26 , 1987 . On Motion by , and seconded by , the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote: AYES : NOES : ABSENT: ATTEST: City of Atascadero BOYD C. SHARITZ, City Clerk MARJORIE MACKEY, Mayor • • APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: JEFFREY G. JORGENSEN MICHAEL SHELTON City Attorney City Manager PREPARED BY: MICHAEL HICKS Fire Chief r EXHIBIT "A" 1987 Weed Abatement Program Page 1 28 . 051 . 52 28 . 091 . 05 28 . 152 . 42 28 . 181 . 13 28 . 011 . 01 28 .051 . 56 28 . 092 . 01 28 . 152 . 45 28 . 181 . 15 28 .021 .02 28 . 051 . 57 28 .092 . 04 28 . 152 . 60 28 . 181 . 16 28 . 021 .03 28 .052 . 13 28 . 092 . 09 28 . 152 . 61 28 . 181 . 17 28 . 021 . 04 28 . 052 . 17 28 .092 . 10 28 . 152 . 65 28 . 181 . 18 28 . 021 . 08 28 . 052 . 19 28 . 092 . 19 28 . 152 . 66 28 . 181 . 19 28 . 021 . 15 28. 052 . 31 28 . 093 . 04 28 . 152 . 70 28 . 181 . 25 28 . 021 . 18 28 . 052 . 32 28 . 093 . 13 28 . 161 . 01 28 . 181 . 26 28 . 021 . 22 28 . 061 .02 28 .093 . 15 28 . 161 . 03 28 . 181 . 27 28 . 021 . 25 28 .061 . 06 28 . 093 . 32 28 . 161 . 06 28 . 181 . 28 28 .021 . 27 28 . 061 . 12 28 . 093 . 33 28 . 161 . 07 28 . 181 . 29 28 .021 . 29 28 .061 . 20 28 .093 . 34 28. 161 . 11 28 . 181 . 30 28. 021 . 30 28 . 061 . 31 28. 093 . 35 28. 161 . 14 28 . 182 .02 28 . 031 . 03 28. 061 . 36 28. 093 . 37 28 . 161 . 15 28 . 182 .05 28. 031 .08 28 . 061 . 41 28 . 093 . 38 28 . 161 . 21 28 . 182 . 06 28 . 031 . 09 28 .061 . 42 28 . 093 . 44 28. 161 . 22 28 . 182 . 09 28 . 032 . 06 28 . 061 . 43 28 . 101 . 01 28 . 161 . 23 28 . 182 . 10 28 .032 . 18 28 . 061 . 44 28 . 101 . 02 28 . 161 . 29 28 . 182 . 17 28 .032 . 19 28 . 061 . 45 28. 101 . 03 28. 161 . 30 28 . 182 . 19 28. 032 . 20 28 . 061 . 50 28 . 103 . 08 28 . 162 . 03 28 . 182 . 20 28 . 032 . 21 28 . 062 . 12 28 . 103 . 09 28 . 162 . 05 28 . 182 . 22 28 . 032 . 27 28 .062 . 15 28 . 1.03 . 11 28 . 162 . 06 28. 182 . 25 28 . 032 . 32 28 . 062 . 17 28 . 103 . 12 28 . 162 .07 28 . 182 . 26 28 . 032 . 34 28 . 062. 20 28 . 103 . 13 28 . 162 .08 28 . 191 . 08 28 . 032 . 35 28 . 062 . 21 28 . 103 . 14 28 . 162 . 13 28 . 191 . 09 28 .032 . 36 28 .062 . 25 28 . 131 . 04 28 . 162 . 14 28 . 191 . 10 28 . 032 . 42 28 . 062 . 26 28 . 131 . 25 28 . 162 . 15 28 . 192 . 02 28 . 032 . 44 28 . 062 . 30 28 . 131 . 26 28 . 162 . 16 28 . 192 . 05 28 . 032 . 46 28 . 062 . 31 28 . 131 . 32 28 . 162 . 21 28 . 192 . 06 28 .032 . 47 28 . 062 . 33 28 . 131 . 34 28 . 162 . 23 28 . 192 . 07 28 . 032 . 49 28 . 062 . 36 28 . 131 . 35 28 . 162 . 25 28. 192 . 14 28 . 041 . 01 28 . 062 . 39 28 . 132 . 14 28 . 162 . 26 28 . 192 . 15 28 . 041 . 04 28 . 071 . 01 28 . 132 .18 28 . 162 . 31 28 . 192 . 19 28 . 042 . 03 28 . 071 . 02 28. 141 .01 28 . 162 . 34 28 . 192 . 20 28 . 042 . 04 28 . 071 . 06 28 . 141 .02 28 . 162 . 35 28 . 192 . 21 28 . 042 . 05 28 . 071 . 09 28 . 141 . 05 28 . 162 . 36 28 . 192 . 24 28 . 042 . 06 28 . 071 . 12 28 . 141 . 14 28 . 162 . 37 28 . 192 . 32 28 . 042 . 08 28 . 071 . 15 28 . 141 . 15 28 . 162 . 38 28 . 192 . 35 28 . 042 . 09 28 . 071 . 28 28 . 141 . 29 28 . 171 . 02 28 . 192 . 44 28 . 042 . 18 28 . 071 . 29 28 . 141 . 30 28 . 171 . 04 28 . 192 . 46 28 . 042 . 29 28 .071 . 32 28 . 141 . 33 28 . 171 . 05 28 . 192 . 50 28 . 042 . 50 28 . 071 . 33 28 . 151 . 34 28 . 171 . 06 28 . 192 . 51 28 . 042 . 51 28 . 071 . 34 28 . 151 . 50 28 . 171 . 07 28 . 201 . 01 28 . 051 . 05 28 . 071 . 35 28 . 151 . 57 28 . 171 . 08 28 . 201 . 04 28 . 051 . 13 28 . 071 . 37 28 . 152 . 01 28 . 171 . 09 28 . 201 . 09 28 . 051 . 18 28 . 071 . 39 28 . 152 . 07 28. 172 . 01 28 . 212 . 01 28 . 051 . 31 28 . 071 . 40 28 . 152 . 08 28 . 172 . 13 28 . 212 . 03 28 . 051 . 35 28 . 072 . 01 28 . 152 . 10 28 . 172 . 14 28 . 212 .05 28 . 051 . 36 28 . 072 . 02 28 . 152 . 13 28 . 172 . 15 28 . 212 . 06 28 . 051 . 43 28 . 081 . 04 28 . 152 . 15 28 . 172 . 24 28 . 213 . 01 28 . 051 . 44 28 . 081 . 05 28 . 152 . 24 28 . 181 . 02 28 . 214 . 01 28 . 051 . 45 28 . 084 . 02 28 . 152 . 29 28 . 181 . 03 28 . 214 . 02 28 . 051 . 50 28 . 091 . 03 28. 152 . 30 28 . 181 . 08 28 . 214 . 13 28 . 051 . 51 28 . 091 . 04 28 . 152 . 40 28. 181 .09 28 . 214 . 17 0 0 EXHIBIT "A" 1987 Weed Abatement Program Page 2 28 . 214 . 18 28 . 282 . 04 28 . 311 . 35 28 . 351 . 02 28 . 372 . 29 28 . 215 . 07 28 . 282 . 12 28 . 311 . 39 28 . 351 . 04 28 . 381 . 21 28 . 215 . 09 28 . 282 . 13 28 . 311 . 41 28 . 351 . 05 28 . 381 . 24 28 . 215 . 12 28 . 282 . 15 28 . 321 . 03 28 . 351 . 12 28. 381 . 25 28 . 215 . 13 28. 282 . 18 28 . 321 . 04 28 . 351 . 14 28 . 382 . 05 28 . 215 . 14 28 . 282 . 20 28 . 321 . 10 28 . 351 . 16 28 . 382 . 06 28 . 215 . 16 28 . 282 . 25 28 . 321 . 11 28 . 351 . 17 28 . 382 . 12 28 . 215 . 17 28 . 282 . 26 28 . 321 . 12 28 . 352 . 05 28 . 382 . 13 28 . 216 . 01 28 . 282 . 27 28. 321 .15 28 . 352 . 06 28 . 382 . 14 28 . 241 . 02 28 .291 . 01 28. 321 . 17 28. 353 . 02 28 . 383 . 01 28 . 241 . 06 28 . 291 . 02 28 . 321 . 18 28 . 353 .03 28 . 383 . 02 28 . 241 . 11 28 . 291 . 03 28 . 321 . 28 28 . 353 .05 28 . 401 . 02 28 . 242 . 07 28 . 291 . 04 28 . 321 . 29 28 . 353 . 06 28 . 401 . 05 28 . 251 . 01 28 . 291 . 09 28 . 321 . 32 28 . 353 . 07 28 . 401 . 06 28 . 251 .09 28 . 292 . 01 28 . 321 . 33 28 . 353 . 08 28 . 401 . 07 28 . 251 . 14 28 . 292 . 04 28.321 . 34 28 . 353 . 09 28. 401 . 08 28 . 251 . 20 28 . 292 . 05 28 . 321 . 35 28 . 353 . 10 28 . 401 . 09 28 . 251 . 21 28 . 292 . 06 28 . 322 .01 28 . 353 . 11 28. 401 . 10 28 . 251 . 25 28 . 292 . 09 28 . 322 . 02 28 . 354 . 03 28 . 401 . 11 28 . 251 . 26 28 . 292 . 10 28 . 322 . 03 28 . 354 . 06 28 . 401 . 15 28 . 251 . 28 28 . 292 . 11 28 . 322 . 08 28 . 354 . 07 28 . 401 . 18 28 . 261 . 08 28 . 292 . 13 28 . 322 . 14 28 . 354 . 10 28 . 401 . 19 28 . 261 .09 28 . 292 . 14 28 . 322 . 21 28 . 355 . 08 28 .401 . 22 28 . 261 . 10 28 . 292 . 15 28 .322 . 24 28 . 355 . 09 28 . 401 . 23 28 . 261 . 11 28 . 292 . 17 28 . 322. 25 28 . 356 . 01 28 . 401 . 24 28 . 261 . 12 28 . 301 . 12 28 . 322 . 30 28 . 361 . 02 28 . 411 . 04 28 . 261 . 16 28 . 301 . 13 28 . 322 . 31 28 . 361 . 08 28 . 411 . 05 28 . 261 . 19 28 . 301 . 16 28 . 322 . 33 28 . 361 . 09 28 . 411 . 07 28 . 261 . 22 28 . 301 . 20 28 . 322 . 34 28 . 361 . 10 28 . 411 . 13 28 . 261 . 26 28 . 301 . 22 28 . 322 . 37 28 . 361 . 17 28 . 411 . 14 28 . 261 . 27 28 . 301 . 26 28 . 322 . 38 28 . 361 . 18 28. 411 . 18 28 . 261 . 28 28 . 301 . 31 28 . 322 . 39 28 . 361 . 23 28 . 411 . 21 28 . 261 . 31 28 . 301 . 32 28 . 322 . 41 28 . 361 . 27 28 . 411 . 23 28 . 261 . 34 28 . 301 . 33 28 . 322 . 49 28 . 361 . 28 28 . 412 . 01 28 . 271 . 06 28 . 301 . 34 28. 331 .05 28 . 361 . 29 28 . 412 . 04 28 . 271 . 08 28 . 301 . 36 28 . 331 . 06 28 . 371 . 04 28 . 412 . 07 28 . 271 . 09 28 . 301 . 38 28. 332 . 01 28 . 371 . 05 28 . 412 . 08 28 . 271 . 13 28 . 311 . 03 28 . 332 . 04 28 . 371 . 09 28 . 412 . 09 28 . 271 . 15 28 . 311 . 04 28. 332 . 08 28 . 371 . 17 28 . 421 . 01 28. 271 . 18 28 . 311 . 04 28 . 332 . 09 28 . 371 . 18 29 .011 . 04 28 . 271 . 23 28 . 311 . 05 28 . 332 . 17 28 . 371 . 19 29 . 011 . 44 28 . 271 . 24 28 . 311 . 08 28 . 332 . 19 28 . 371 . 20 29 . 011 . 45 28 . 271 . 25 28 . 311 . 09 28 . 332 . 20 28 . 371 . 21 29 . 012 . 02 28 . 271 . 28 28 . 311 . 12 28 . 332 . 21 28 . 371 . 25 29 . 012 . 03 28 . 271 . 29 28 . 311 . 13 28 . 332 . 25 28 . 371 . 26 29 . 01,2 . 11 28 . 281 .01 28 . 311 . 14 28 . 332 . 27 28 . 371 . 29 29 . 012 . 26 28 . 281 . 02 28 . 311 . 15 28 . 332 . 29 28 . 371 . 30 29 . 021 . 05 28 . 281 . 04 28 . 311 . 15 28 . 332 . 30 28 . 372 . 10 29 . 021 . 06 28 . 281 .05 28 . 311 . 28 28 . 332 . 31 28 . 372 . 11 29 . 022 . 05 28 . 281 . 11 28 . 311 . 29 28 . 332 . 35 28 . 372 . 13 29 . 022 . 21 28 . 281 . 13 28 . 311 . 31 28 . 341 . 12 28 . 372 . 14 29 .023 . 07 28 . 281 . 14 28 . 311 . 32 28 . 341 . 18 28 . 372 . 15 29 . 023 . 12 28 . 281 . 15 28 . 311 . 33 28 . 341 . 21 28 . 372 . 19 29 . 024 . 17 28 . 282 . 02 28 . 311 . 34 28 . 341 . 23 28 . 372 . 22 29 . 031 . 05 EXHIBIT "A" 1987 Weed Abatement Program Page 3 29 . 031 . 06 29 . 106 . 05 29 . 181 . 28 29 . 253 . 14 29 . 322 . 06 29 . 031 . 07 29 . 111 . 02 29 . 181 . 29 29 . 253 . 15 29 . 322 . 19 29 . 031 . 08 29 . 111 . 04 29 . 181 . 49 29 . 253 . 30 29 . 322 . 20 29 . 032 . 11 29 . 121 . 01 29 . 191 .09 29 . 253 . 31 29 . 323 . 17 29 . 032 . 12 29 . 121 . 05 29 . 191 . 11 29 . 261 . 01 29 . 323 . 19 29 . 032 . 13 29 . 121 . 15 29 . 191 . 14 29 . 261 . 19 29 . 323 . 21 29 . 041 . 08 29 . 121 . 18 29 . 191 . 24 29 . 262 . 06 29 . 341 . 20 29 . 041 . 15 29 . 121 . 22 29 . 191 . 32 29 . 262 . 07 29 . 342 .05 29 . 041 . 16 29 . 131 . 27 29 . 191 . 34 29 . 262 . 23 29 . 342 . 13 29 .042 . 03 29 . 131 . 29 29 . 191 .49 29 . 262 . 24 29 . 342 . 14 29 .042 . 04 29 . 131 . 30 29 . 201 . 02 29 . 271 . 01 29 . 342 . 24 29 . 042 . 07 29 . 132 . 02 29 . 201 . 08 29 . 271 . 04 29 . 343 . 08 29 . 042 . 08 29 . 132 . 04 29 . 201 . 15 29 . 271 . 05 29 . 343 . 11 29 . 042 . 09 29 . 141 .01 29 . 201 . 18 29 . 271 .06 29 . 344 . 27 29 . 051 .03 29 . 141 .06 29 . 202 .05 29 . 271 . 07 29 . 344 . 33 29 . 051 . 06 29 . 141 . 07 29 . 202 . 16 29 . 271 . 13 29 . 351 .01 29 . 051 . 11 29 . 141 .09 29 . 202 . 17 29 . 271 . 20 29 . 353 .01 29 .051 . 17 29 . 141 . 10 29 . 211 .01 29 . 272 . 21 29 . 361 . 14 29 .051 . 23 29 . 141 . 13 29 . 211 . 02 29 . 281 . 06 29 . 382 . 18 29 . 051 . 24 29 . 141 . 17 29 . 211 . 09 29 . 281 . 13 29 . 382 . 19 29 .051 . 30 29 . 141 . 21 29 . 211 . 17 29 . 281 . 29 29 . 382 . 23 29 .061 . 25 29 . 141 . 22 29 . 211 . 18 29 . 281 . 30 29 . 061 . 32 29 . 142 . 11 29 . 211 . 20 29 . 281 . 36 29 . 061 . 33 29 . 142 : 28 29 . 211 . 25 29 . 281 . 39 30 . 011 . 06 29 . 061 . 37 29 . 142 . 29 29 . 212 . 02 29 . 281 . 40 30 . 011 . 07 29 . 061 . 41 29 . 151 . 01 29 . 212 .06 29 . 281 . 43 30 .011 . 08 29 . 061 . 42 29 . 151 . 12 29 . 212 . 13 29 . 291 . 07 30 . 011 . 09 29 .061 . 44 29 . 151 . 20 29 . 212 . 13 29 . 291 . 14 30 . 011 . 14 29 .061 . 45 29 . 151 . 22 29 . 212 . 20 29 . 291 . 33 30 . 011 . 15 29 . 062 . 01 29 . 151 . 23 29 . 212 . 21 29 . 301 . 05 30 . 011 . 24 29 . 062 .02 29 . 151 . 24 29 . 212 . 23 29 . 301 . 06 30 . 011 . 28 29 . 062 . 10 29 . 151 . 25 29 . 212 . 23 29 . 301 . 11 30 . 011 . 30 29 . 062 . 30 29 . 152 .04 29 . 212 . 24 29 . 301 . 15 30 . 011 . 31 29 . 071 . 01 29 . 152 . 09 29 . 221 . 01 29 . 301 . 23 30 . 011 . 39 29 . 071 . 32 29 . 152 . 10 29 . 221 . 12 29 . 301 . 31 30 . 011 . 40 29 . 071 . 33 29 . 152 . 17 29 . 221 . 13 29 . 301 . 33 30 . 021 . 02 29 . 081 . 02 29 . 152 . 19 29 . 222 . 22 29 . 302 . 02 30 . 021 . 05 29 . 081 . 05 29 . 152 . 21 29 . 222 . 25 29 . 302 . 03 30. 021 . 06 29 . 081 . 06 29 . 152 . 25 29 . 222 . 26 29 . 302 . 10 30 . 021 . 07 29 . 081 . 07 29 . 161 . 07 29 . 222 . 32 29 . 302 . 20 30 . 021 . 08 29 . 081 . 09 29 . 161 . 09 29 . 222 . 34 29 . 302 . 28 30 . 021 .09 29 . 081 . 12 29 . 171 . 01 29 . 223 . 03 29 . 302 . 36 30 . 021 . 11 29 . 081 . 13 29 . 171 . 02 29 . 223 . 04 29 . 302 . 50 30 . 021 . 12 29 . 082 . 02 29 . 171. 03 29 . 223 . 08 29 . 302 . 52 30 . 021 . 13 29 . 082 . 16 29 . 171 . 07 29 . 223 . 10 29 . 311 . 01 30 . 021 . 14 29 . 082 . 22 29 . 171 . 11 29 . 231 . 02 29 . 311 . 09 30 . 031 .02 29 . 101 . 65 29 . 171 . 12 29 . 231 . 13 29 . 311 . 11 30 . 031 . 03 29 . 104 . 04 29 . 171 . 13 29 . 231 . 14 29 . 311 . 33 30 . 031 . 09 29 . 105 . 14 29 .171 . 15 29 . 233 . 07 29 . 311 . 34 30 . 031 . 11 29 . 105 . 23 29 . 171 . 17 29 . 233 . 17 29 . 311 . 39 30 . 031 . 12 29 . 105 . 24 29 . 171 . 18 29 . 233 . 19 29 . 312 . 11 30 . 031 . 15 29 . 105 . 33 29 . 181 . 05 29 . 233 . 25 29 . 312 . 12 30 . 031 . 16 29 . 105 . 34 29 . 181 . 07 29 . 241 . 02 29 . 312 . 18 30 . 031 . 17 29 . 106 . 04 29 . 181 . 22 29 . 253 . 05 29 . 312 . 26 30 . 031 . 18 0 i EXHIBIT "A" 1987 Weed Abatement Program Page 4 30 .031 . 19 30 . 071 . 36 30. 152 . 02 30 . 251 . 18 30 . 301 . 17 30 . 031 . 20 30 . 081 . 03 30 . 152 . 03 30 . 251 . 21 30 . 301 . 18 30 . 041 . 03 30 . 081 . 05 30 . 152. 06 30 . 251. 23 30 . 301 . 22 30 . 041 . 04 30 . 091 . 11 30 . 152 . 14 30 . 251 . 25 30 . 301 . 48 30 . 041 . 05 30 . 091 . 17 30 . 152. 16 30 . 251 . 26 30 . 301 . 53 30 . 041 . 06 30 . 091 . 18 30 . 152 . 32 30 . 251 . 27 30 . 301 . 54 30 . 041 . 07 30 . 091 . 19 30 . 152 . 33 30 . 251 . 30 30 . 301 . 56 30 .041 . 08 30 . 091 . 34 30 . 152 . 34 30 . 251 . 31 30 . 311 . 01 30. 041 . 09 30 . 091 . 42 30 . 152. 36 30 . 251 . 33 30. 311 . 02 30 . 041 . 10 30 . 091 . 43 30 . 161 .01 30 . 261 . 04 30 . 311 . 04 30 . 041 . 11 30 . 101 . 05 30.161 . 02 30 . 261 .06 30 . 311 . 05 30 . 041 . 12 30 . 101 . 26 30 . 161 .04 30 . 261 . 11 30 . 311 . 09 30 . 041 . 13 30 . 101 . 27 30 . 171 . 14 30 . 261 . 13 30 .311 . 10 30 .041 . 14 30 . 101 . 36 30 . 171 . 15 30 .261 . 14 30 . 311 . 11 30 . 041 . 15 30 . 101 . 39 30 . 171 . 16 30 . 261 . 16 30 . 311 . 12 30 . 041 . 16 30 . 101 . 40 30 . 171 . 17 30 . 261 . 18 30. 321 . 06 30 . 051 . 03 30 . 101 . 42 30 . 171 . 20 30 . 261 . 19 30 . 321 . 06 30 . 051 .04 30 . 111 . 02 30 . 172 . 01 30 . 261 . 21 30 . 321 . 08 30 . 051 .09 30 . 111 . 09 30 . 172. 06 30 . 261 . 22 30 . 321 . 08 30 . 051 . 18 30 . 111 . 10 30 . 172 .09 30.261 . 23 30 . 321 . 11 30 .051 . 19 30 . 111 . 15 30 . 172 . 16 30 . 271 . 16 30 . 321 . 11 30 . 051 . 20 30 . 111 . 16 30 . 172 . 17 30 . 271 . 18 30 . 321 . 12 30 . 051 . 22 30 . 111 . 24 30 . 172 . 18 30 . 271 . 19 30 . 321 . 12 30 . 051 . 27 30 . 111 . 25 30 . 181 . 56 30 . 271 . 21 30 . 321 . 13 30 . 051 . 30 30 . 111 . 29 30 . 182 . 01 30 . 271 . 22 30 . 321 . 13 30 . 051 . 31 30 . 111 . 33 30 . 182 . 03 30 . 271 . 23 30 . 321 . 15 30 . 051 . 32 30 . 111 . 37 30 . 182 . 58 30 . 271 . 24 30 . 321 . 15 30 . 051 . 35 30 . 111 . 39 30 . 191 . 11 30 . 271 . 25 30 . 331 . 01 30 . 051 . 36 30 . 111 . 40 30 . 191 . 40 30. 271 . 27 30 . 331 . 03 30 . 051 . 37 30 . 111 .41 30 . 201 . 01 30 . 281. 11 30 . 331. 06 30 . 051 . 38 30 . 111 . 42 30 . 212 . 16 30 . 281 . 30 30 . 331 . 07 30 . 051 . 39 30 . 121 .01 30 . 213 . 01 30 . 282 . 15 30. 331 . 08 30. 061 . 08 30 . 121 . 02 30 .213 . 08 30 . 282 . 17 30 . 331 . 09 30 . 061 . 11 30 . 131 . 08 30 . 213 . 10 30 . 282 . 24 30 . 331 . 10 30 . 061 . 19 30 . 131 . 09 30 . 221 . 20 30 . 282 . 27 30 . 331 . 11 30 . 061 . 20 30 . 131. 23 30 . 231 . 19 30 . 282 . 33 30 . 332 . 02 30 . 061 . 22 30 . 131 . 30 30 . 231 . 20 30 . 282 . 34 30 . 332 . 03 30 . 061 . 23 30 . 131 . 38 30 . 232 . 15 30 . 282 . 38 30 . 332 . 04 30 . 061 . 25 30 . 131 . 39 30 . 232 . 16 30 . 283 . 05 30 . 332 . 05 30 .061. 27 30 . 131 . 43 30 . 232 . 24 30 . 291 . 07 30 . 332 . 14 30 . 061 . 30 30 . 131 . 44 30 . 232 . 25 30 . 291 . 13 30 . 332 . 15 30 . 061 . 31 30 . 132 . 04 30 . 232 . 26 30 . 291 . 15 30 . 332 . 18 30 . 061 . 49 30. 132 . 05 30 . 232 . 27 30 . 291 . 19 30 . 332 . 19 30 . 061 . 50 30 . 132 . 06 30 . 241 . 53 30 . 291 . 20 30 . 332 . 20 30 . 061 . 51 30 . 132 . 14 30 . 241 . 57 30 . 291 . 21 30 . 332 . 21 30 . 061 . 52 30 . 132 . 39 30 . 241 . 58 30 . 292 . 21 30 . 332 . 23 30 . 071 . 06 30 . 141 . 16 30 . 241 . 59 30 . 292 . 24 30 . 332 . 24 30 . 071 . 16 30 . 141 . 18 30 . 241 . 60 30 . 292 . 27 30 . 332 . 26 30 . 071 . 17 30 . 141 . 65 30 . 241 . 61 30. 292 . 33 30 . 332 . 27 30 . 071 . 18 30 . 151 . 03 30 . 241 . 62 30 . 292 . 34 30 . 341 . 06 30 . 071 . 25 30 . 151 . 15 30 . 242 . 25 30 . 292 . 38 30 . 341 . 08 30 . 071 . 30 30 . 151 . 21 30 . 242 . 31 30 . 292 . 39 30 . 351 . 11 30 . 071 . 32 30 . 151 . 22 30. 251 . 05 30 . 292 . 41 30 . 351 . 19 30 . 071 . 34 30 . 151 . 34 30 . 251 . 08 30 . 292 . 45 30 . 351 . 29 s 0 EXHIBIT "A" 1987 Weed Abatement Program Page 5 30 . 352 . 10 30 . 481 . 01 31 . 023 . 01 31 . 052 . 28 31 . 091 . 11 30 . 352 . 14 30 . 483 . 02 31. 023 . 06 31 . 061 . 01 31 . 091 . 13 30 . 352 . 18 30. 483 . 03 31 . 023 . 10 31 . 061 . 10 31 . 091 . 15 30 . 371 . 10 30. 483 . 04 31 . 023 . 11 31 . 061 . 13 31 . 091 . 16 30 . 371 . 11 30 . 483 . 05 31 . 023 . 15 31 . 061 . 14 31 .091 . 17 30 . 371 . 15 30 . 492 . 01 31 .023 . 17 31 .061 . 30 31 . 091 . 18 30 . 372 . 08 30 .492 . 02 31 . 023 . 18 31 . 061 .32 31 . 091 . 24 30. 372 . 24 30 . 492 .03 31 . 023 . 22 31 . 061 . 34 31 .091 . 29 30. 372 . 25 30. 492 . 10 31 . 023 . 23 31 . 061 . 35 31 . 091 . 31 30 . 372 . 26 30 . 501 .03 31 . 023 . 24 31 .061 . 37 31 .092 . 05 30 . 373 . 20 30. 511 . 01 31 . 023 . 25 31 .061 . 38 31 .092 . 11 30 . 373 . 30 30 . 511 . 02 31 .024 . 01 31 . 061 . 40 31 .092 . 12 30 . 391 . 01 30 . 512 . 02 31 . 024 . 02 31 .062 .03 31 . 092 . 14 30 . 391 . 02 30 . 512 . 03 31 .041 . 16 31 .062 . 04 31 .092 . 16 30 . 391 . 03 30 . 512 . 08 31 .041 . 19 31 . 062 . 09 31 .092 . 17 30. 401 . 01 30 . 513 . 11 31 . 041 . 21 31 .062 . 16 31 .092 . 18 30. 401 . 02 30. 513 . 52 31 .041 . 22 31 . 062 . 18 31 . 101 . 01 30 . 401 . 03 30 . 521 . 01 31 . 041 . 23 31 . 071 . 13 31 . 101 . 02 30 . 401 . 04 30 . 521 . 09 31 . 041 . 25 31 . 071 . 17 31 . 101. 03 30 .401 . 05 30 . 521 . 10 31 .041 . 26 31 . 071 . 18 31 . 101 .04 30 . 411 . 01 30 . 521 . 11 31 .041 . 28 31 . 071 . 19 31 . 101 .06 30. 411 .02 30 . 522 . 02 31 .041 . 29 31 .071 . 23 31 . 101.08 30 . 412 . 03 30 . 522 . 04 31 .042 . 03 31 . 071 . 24 31 . 101 . 09 30 . 421 . 01 30 . 522 . 05 31 . 042 .04 31 . 071 . 29 31 . 101 . 11 30 . 421 . 03 30 . 522 . 08 31 . 042 .05 31 .071 . 30 31 . 101 . 12 30 . 421 . 04 30 . 522 . 22 31 . 042 . 06 31 . 071 . 31 31 .101 . 13 30.421 . 05 30 . 523 . 02 31 . 042 . 13 31 . 071 . 33 31 . 102 .01 30 . 422 . 01 30 . 523 . 05 31 . 042 . 14 31 .071 . 34 31 . 102 . 02 30 . 422 . 06 31 . 043 . 10 31 . 081 . 03 31 . 102. 13 30 . 422 . 09 31 . 043 . 11 31 . 081 . 04 31 . 102 . 15 30 . 431 . 02 31 . 012 .02 31 . 043 . 21 31 . 081 . 10 31 .102 . 16 30. 431 . 06 31 . 012 . 04 31 . 043 . 22 31 . 081 . 11 31. 104 .01 30 . 431 . 07 31 . 012 . 07 31 . 043 . 27 31 . 081 . 12 31 . 104 .08 30 . 431 . 09 31 . 012 . 10 31 .051 . 23 31 .081 . 13 31 . 104 .09 30 . 431 . 12 31 .012 . 11 31 . 051 . 33 31 . 081 . 16 31 . 104 . 10 30 . 431 . 15 31 . 012 . 12 31 . 051 . 38 31 .081 . 17 31 . 104 . 14 30 . 431 . 17 31 . 012 . 16 31 . 051 . 38 31 . 081 . 19 31 . 104 . 19 30 . 442 . 01 31 . 012 . 17 31 . 051 . 39 31 . 081 . 19 31 . 104 . 20 30 . 442 . 02 31 . 012 . 18 31 . 051 . 42 31 .081 . 20 31 . 104 . 21 30 . 442 . 03 31 . 012 . 19 31 . 051 . 44 31 . 082 . 13 31 . 104 . 22 30 . 442 . 05 31 . 012 . 20 31 . 051 . 44 31 . 082 . 20 31 . 111 . 01 30 . 442 . 06 31 . 012 . 22 31 .051 . 49 31 . 082 . 24 31 . 111 . 02 30 . 451 . 01 31 . 012 . 23 31 . 051 . 51 31 . 082 . 32 31 . 111 . 03 30 . 451 . 02 31 . 012 . 24 31 . 051 . 54 31 . 082 . 33 31 . 111 .04 30 . 451 . 03 31 . 013 . 01 31 . 052 . 06 31 . 082 . 34 31 . 112 . 01 30 . 451 . 05 31 . 013 . 05 31 . 052 . 07 31 . 082 . 35 31 . 112 . 02 30 . 451 . 06 31 . 013 . 36 31 . 052 . 08 31 .091 . 01 31 . 112 . 04 30 . 451 . 07 31 . 013 . 37 31 . 052 . 11 31 . 091 . 04 31 . 112 . 05 30 . 461 . 11 31 . 021 . 01 31 . 052 . 15 31 . 091 . 05 31 . 112 . 06 30 . 461 . 15 31 . 021 . 05 31 . 052 . 16 31 . 091 . 06 31 . 112 . 07 30 . 461 . 16 31 . 021 . 06 31 . 052 . 17 31 . 091 . 07 31 . 112 .09 30 . 471 . 01 31 . 021 . 24 31 . 052 . 20 31 . 091 . 08 31 . 112 . 10 30 . 471 . 02 31 . 021 . 26 31 . 052 . 21 31 . 091 .09 31 . 112 . 11 30 . 471 . 03 31 . 022 . 01 31 . 052 . 23 31 . 091 . 10 31 . 112 . 12 • • EXHIBIT "A" 1987 Weed Abatement Program Page 6 31 . 112 . 13 31 . 142 . 03 31 . 202 . 06 31 . 241 . 24 31 . 291 . 28 31 . 112 . 14 31 . 142 . 03 31 . 202 . 08 31 . 241 . 25 31 . 291 . 29 31 . 113 . 01 31 . 142 . 18 31 . 202 . 17 31 . 242 . 10 31 . 301 . 01 31 . 113 . 02 31 . 142 . 20 31 . 202 . 18 31 . 242 . 11 31 . 301 . 25 31 . 113 . 03 31 . 151 . 15 31 . 202 . 19 31 . 242 . 12 31 . 301 . 29 31 . 113 . 10 31 . 151 . 16 31 . 202 . 20 31 . 242 . 13 31 . 302 . 11 31 . 114 . 01 31 . 151 . 21 31 . 202 . 22 31 . 242 . 14 31 . 302 . 12 31 . 114 .02 31 . 151 . 22 31 . 202 . 23 31 . 242 . 17 31 . 302 . 12 31 . 114 .04 31 . 151 . 24 31 . 202 . 24 31 . 251 . 01 31 . 302 . 13 31 . 114 . 05 31 . 151 . 27 31 . 202 . 25 31 . 251 .05 31 . 302 . 19 31 . 115 .01 31 . 151 . 28 31 . 202 . 26 31 . 251 . 16 31 . 311 . 01 31 . 115 .03 31 . 152 .03 31 . 202 . 27 31 . 251 . 26 31 . 311 . 02 31 . 115 . 05 31 . 161 . 04 31 . 202 . 28 31 . 251 . 27 31 . 311 .03 31 . 115 .06 31 . 161 . 19 31 . 202 . 29 31 . 251 . 28 31 . 311 .04 31 . 121 .01 31 . 161 .24 31 . 211 . 02 31 . 251 . 38 31 . 311 .05 31 . 121 . 02 31 . 161 . 33 31 . 211 .04 31 . 251 . 38 31 . 311 . 06 31 . 122 . 04 31 . 161 . 34 31 . 211 .06 31 . 251 . 41 31 . 311 . 07 31 . 122 . 05 31 . 161 . 35 31 . 211 . 07 31 . 251 . 47 31 . 311 . 16 31 . 122 . 06 31 . 161 . 36 31 . 211 . 08 31 . 251 . 48 31 . 311 . 17 31 . 122 . 07 31 . 161 . 37 31 . 211 . 09 31 . 261 .03 31 . 311 . 19 31 . 122 . 08 31 . 161 . 39 31 . 221 . 06 31 . 261 .03 31 . 321 . 01 31 . 122 . 09 31 . 171 . 01 31 . 221 . 10 31 . 261 . 05 31 . 321 . 02 31 . 122 . 12 31 . 171 . 02 31 . 221 . 11 31 . 261 . 05 31 . 321 . 03 31 . 123 . 01 31 . 171 . 17 31 . 221 . 14 31 . 261 . 06 31 . 321 . 04 31 . 123 . 02 31 . 171 . 18 31 . 221 . 15 31 . 261 . 15 31 . 321 . 07 31 . 123 . 03 31 . 171 . 22 31 . 221 . 19 31 . 261 . 15 31 . 321 . 08 31 . 123 . 05 31 . 181 . 01 31 . 221 . 22 31 . 261 . 19 31 . 321 . 09 31 . 123 . 06 31 . 181 .02 31 . 221 . 25 31 . 261 . 19 31 . 321 . 12 31 . 123 . 07 31 . 181 .04 31 . 221 . 26 31 . 261 . 26 31 . 321 . 14 31 . 123 . 08 31 . 181 . 05 31 . 221 . 27 31 . 261 . 29 31 . 321 . 16 31 . 123 . 11 31 . 181 . 06 31 . 222 . 01 31 . 261 . 29 31 . 321 . 17 31 . 123 . 12 31 . 182 .05 31 . 222 . 02 31 . 271 . 10 31. 331 .05 31 . 124 . 01 31 . 182 . 09 31 . 222 . 03 31 . 271 . 13 31 . 331 . 09 31. 125 . 01 31 . 182 . 36 31 . 222 . 07 31 . 271 . 26 31 . 331 . 10 31 . 125 . 03 31 . 182 . 37 31 . 222 . 08 31 . 271 . 33 31 . 331 . 11 31 . 125 . 03 31 . 183 . 02 31 . 222 . 09 31 . 271 . 38 31 . 331 . 12 31 . 125 . 04 31 . 183 .04 31 . 222 . 18 31 . 271 . 40 31 . 341 . 06 31 . 125 . 13 31 . 183 .05 31 . 231 . 02 31 . 271 . 42 31 . 341 . 07 31 . 133 . 02 31 . 183 . 28 31 . 231 . 03 31 . 271 . 43 31 . 341 . 21 31 . 133 . 03 31 . 183. 29 31 . 231 . 19 31 . 271 . 47 31 . 341 . 22 31 . 133 .04 31 . 191 . 02 31 . 231 . 24 31 . 271 . 48 31 . 341 . 23 31 . 134 . 03 31 . 191 . 03 31 . 231 . 34 31 . 281 . 13 31 . 341 . 24 31 . 134 . 09 31 . 191 . 04 31 . 231 . 36 31 . 281 . 14 31 . 341 . 25 31 . 134 . 10 31 . 191 . 05 31 . 231 . 38 31 . 281 . 16 31 . 351 .05 31 . 134 . 23 31 . 191 . 06 31 . 241 . 02 31 . 281 . 20 31 . 351 . 06 31 . 141 . 04 31 . 191 . 17 31 . 241 . 04 31 . 281 . 22 31 . 361 . 03 31 . 141 . 07 31 . 192 . 07 31 . 241 . 06 31 . 291 . 02 31 . 361 . 05 31 . 141 . 16 31 . 192 . 14 31 . 241 . 07 31 . 291 . 20 31 . 361 .07 31 . 141 . 30 31 . 192 . 15 31 . 241 . 08 31 . 291 . 21 31 . 361 . 14 31 . 141 . 40 31 . 192 . 16 31 . 241 . 10 31 . 291 . 22 31 . 361 . 17 31 . 141 . 50 31 . 192 . 18 31 . 241 . 11 31 . 291 . 23 31 . 361 . 19 31 . 141 . 51 31 . 192 . 19 31 . 241 . 12 31 . 291 . 24 31 . 361 . 20 31 . 142 . 01 31 . 202 . 04 31 . 241 . 19 31 . 291 . 26 31 . 361 . 22 31 . 142 . 01 31 . 202 . 05 31 . 241 . 21 31 . 291 . 27 31 . 362 . 03 • 0 EXHIBIT "A" 1987 Weed Abatement Program Page 7 31 . 373 . 03 45 . 441 . 05 49 . 041 . 16 49 . 072 . 03 49 . 093 . 15 31 . 373 . 06 45 . 441 . 06 49 . 041 . 17 49 . 072 . 05 49 . 093 . 16 31 . 381 . 27 45 . 441 . 08 49 . 042 . 15 49 . 072 . 06 49 . 093 . 17 31 . 381 . 34 45 . 441 . 09 49 . 042 . 18 49 . 072 . 07 49 . 093 . 17 31 . 381 . 46 45 . 441 . 12 49 . 042 . 23 49 . 073 . 04 49 . 093 . 35 31 . 381 . 47 45 . 441 . 18 49 . 051 . 10 49 . 073 . 05 49 . 093 . 36 31 . 381 . 47 45 . 441 . 19 49 . 051 . 11 49 . 073 . 09 49 .093 . 36 31 . 381 . 52 45 . 441 . 25 49 . 051 . 12 49. 073 . 15 49 . 093 . 41 31 . 381 . 55 45 . 441 . 26 49 . 051 . 14 49 . 073 . 16 49 . 093 . 42 31 . 381 . 60 45 . 441 . 30 49 . 051 . 14 49 .073 . 19 49 . 101 .09 45 . 451 . 04 49 .051 . 17 49 . 073 . 20 49 . 101 . 10 45 . 451 .05 49 .051 . 21 49 .073 . 22 49 . 101 . 11 45 . 301 .02 45 . 451 . 06 49 . 051 . 22 49 . 073 . 25 49 . 101 . 12 45 . 302 .05 45 . 451 .07 49 . 051 . 22 49 .073 . 34 49 . 101 . 15 45 . 302 .06 45 . 451 .08 49 .051 . 24 49 . 073 . 35 49 . 101 . 18 45 . 302 . 07 45 . 451 . 11 49 . 051 . 25 49 . 073 . 37 49 . 101 . 19 45 . 302 .08 45 . 451 . 13 49 .052 .01 49 .073 . 46 49 . 101 . 21 45 . 302 . 09 45 . 451 . 14 49 . 052 . 02 49 . 073 . 47 49 . 101 . 22 45 . 321 . 03 45 . 451 . 15 49 . 052 . 03 49 . 073 . 48 49. 101 . 24 45 . 332 . 03 45 . 451 . 16 49 . 052 .05 49 .073 . 50 49. 101 . 49 45 . 332 .04 45 . 451 . 18 49 . 052 .06 49 . 073 . 51 49 . 102 . 01 45 . 332 .05 45 . 451 . 20 49 .052 . 14 49 . 073 . 51 49 . 102 . 12 45 . 332 .08 45 . 451 . 21 49 . 052 . 18 49 . 073 . 53 49 . 102 . 31 45 . 332 . 09 45 . 451 . 22 49 .052 . 21 49 . 073 . 55 49 . 102 . 32 45 . 342 . 06 45 . 451 . 24 49 .052 . 22 49 .073 . 56 49 . 102 . 48 45 . 342 . 07 45 . 451 . 25 49 . 052 . 23 49 .073 . 57 49 . 102 . 53 45 . 342 . 08 45 . 451 . 26 49 . 052 . 25 49 .073 . 58 49 . 102 . 54 45 . 342 .09 45 . 451 . 27 49 . 052 . 27 49 .073 . 60 49 . 111 .01 45 . 342. 12 45 .451 . 29 49 . 052 . 29 49 . 073 . 61 49 . 111 . 07 45 . 351 . 02 45 . 451 . 30 49 . 052 . 31 49 . 073 . 62 49 . 111 . 08 45 .351 . 03 45 . 451 . 31 49 . 052 . 32 49 . 073 . 63 49 . 111 . 09 45 . 351 . 07 45 . 451 . 32 49 . 052 . 33 49 . 073 . 65 49 . 111 . 12 45 . 351 .07 45 . 451 . 33 49 . 052 . 34 49 . 073 . 66 49 . 111 . 14 45 . 351 . 14 45 . 451 . 34 49 . 052 . 35 49 . 073 . 68 49 . 111 . 18 45 . 351 . 16 45 . 451 . 35 49 . 052 . 36 49 . 073 . 69 49 . 111 . 20 45 . 361 . 14 45 . 451 . 36 49 . 061 . 04 49 . 073 . 70 49 . 111 . 22 45 . 361 . 15 45 . 451 . 37 49 .061 . 10 49 . 074 . 01 49 . 112 . 05 45 . 361 . 27 45 . 451 . 38 49 . 061 . 11 49 . 074 . 02 49 . 112 .06 45 . 361 . 28 45 . 451 . 39 49 . 061 . 14 49 . 075 . 01 49 . 112 . 15 45 . 371 . 02 45 . 451 . 40 49 . 061 . 21 49 . 075 .02 49 . 112 . 20 45 . 371 . 04 45 . 451 . 41 49 . 061 . 22 49 . 075 . 03 49 . 112 . 24 45 . 371 . 05 49 . 061 . 23 49 . 091 .04 49 . 112 . 25 45 . 371 . 13 49 . 061 . 26 49 . 092 . 07 49 . 112 . 26 45 . 411 . 03 49 . 022 . 09 49 . 061 . 27 49 .092 . 20 49 . 112 . 27 45 . 421 . 01 49 . 031 . 06 49 . 062 . 06 49 . 092 . 27 49 . 112 . 29 45 . 421 . 02 49 . 031 . 07 49 . 062 . 07 49 . 092 .29 49 . 121 . 03 45 . 421 . 03 49 .031 . 08 49 .071 . 06 49 . 092 . 32 49 . 121 . 07 45 . 421 . 06 49 . 041 . 05 49 . 071 . 08 49 . 092 . 33 49 . 121 . 12 45 . 421 . 08 49 . 041 . 09 49 . 071 . 12 49 . 092 . 34 49 . 121 . 14 45 . 421 . 09 49 . 041 . 10 49 . 071 . 13 49 . 092 . 38 49 .121 . 15 45 . 421 . 12 49 . 041 . 12 49 . 071 . 17 49 . 092 . 43 49 . 121 . 17 45 . 431 . 04 49 . 041 . 13 49 . 071 . 18 49 . 092 . 44 49 . 121 . 24 45 . 441 . 01 49 . 041 . 14 49 . 071 . 19 49 . 093 . 06 49 . 121 .26 45 . 441 . 02 49 . 041 . 15 49 . 071 . 21 49 . 093 . 07 49 . 121 . 27 EXHIBIT "A" 1987 Weed Abatement Program Page 8 49 . 121 . 28 49 . 141 . 10 49 . 152 . 35 49 . 163 . 51 49 . 202 . 11 49 . 121 . 30 49 . 141 . 22 49 . 152 . 36 49 . 163 . 54 49 . 202 . 16 49 . 121 . 31 49 . 141 . 23 49 . 152 . 37 49 . 163 . 55 49 . 202 . 18 49 . 122 . 02 49 . 141 . 24 49 . 152 . 38 49 . 163 . 56 49 . 202 . 19 49 . 122 . 05 49 . 141 . 26 49 . 152 . 39 49 . 163 . 57 49 . 211 . 03 49 . 122 . 06 49 . 141 . 30 49 . 152 . 40 49 . 163 . 58 49 . 211 .03 49 . 122 . 08 49 . 141 . 35 49 . 152 . 41 49 . 163 . 59 49 . 211 . 11 49 . 122 . 09 49 . 141 . 36 49 . 152 . 42 49 . 163 . 61 49 . 211 . 11 49 . 122 . 13 49 . 141 . 38 49 . 152 . 44 49 . 163 . 62 49 . 211 . 16 49 . 122 . 14 49 . 141 . 40 49 . 161 . 02 49 . 163 . 63 49 . 211 . 16 49 . 122 . 16 49 . 141 . 41 49 . 161 . 08 49 . 163 . 64 49 . 21.1 . 18 49 . 122 . 22 49 . 141 . 42 49 . 161 .09 49 . 163 . 65 49 . 211 . 18 49 . 122 . 23 49 . 141 . 43 49 . 163 .01 49 . 172 .06 49 . 211 . 20 49 . 123 . 02 49 . 141 . 44 49 . 163 .02 49 . 172 . 08 49 . 211 . 20 49 . 123 .06 49 . 141 . 46 49 . 163 .03 49 . 173 . 64 49 . 211 . 27 49 . 123 .07 49 . 142 . 08 49 . 163 . 07 49 . 181 . 01 49 . 211 . 27 49 . 123 . 09 49 . 142 . 09 49 . 163 . 08 49 . 182 . 06 49 . 211 . 32 49 . 123 . 18 49 . 151 . 05 49 . 163 . 09 49. 182 . 14 49 . 211 . 32 49 . 123 . 19 49 . 151 . 06 49 . 163 . 10 49 . 182 . 15 49 . 211 . 33 49 . 123 .20 49 . 151 . 08 49 . 163 . 11 49 . 183 . 09 49 . 211 . 33 49 . 123 . 22 49 . 151 . 09 49 . 163 . 12 49 . 183 . 11 49 . 211 . 40 49 . 123 . 23 49 . 151 . 11 49 . 163 . 13 49 . 183 . 13 49 . 211 . 40 49 . 123 . 27 49 . 151 . 12 49 . 163. 14 49 . 183 . 14 49 . 211 . 43 49 . 123 . 28 49 . 151 . 17 49 . 163 . 1.5 49 . 183 . 17 49 . 211 . 43 49 . 123 . 29 49 . 151 . 20 49 . 163 . 18 49 . 183 . 18 49 . 212 .01 49 . 123 . 33 49 . 151 . 25 49 . 163 . 19 49 . 191 . 02 49 . 212 . 02 49 . 123 . 34 49 . 151 . 26 49 . 163 . 20 49 . 191 . 04 49 . 212 . 05 49 . 131 . 21 49 . 151 . 27 49 . 163 . 21 49 . 191 . 15 49 . 212 . 05 49 . 131 . 22 49 . 151 . 28 49 . 163 . 22 49 . 191 . 16 49 . 212 . 11 49 . 131 . 31 49 . 151 . 29 49 . 163 . 23 49 . 191 . 22 49 . 212 . 12 49 . 131 . 32 49 . 151 . 33 49 . 163 . 23 49 . 191 . 23 49 . 212 . 12 49 . 131 . 35 49 . 151 . 34 49 . 163 . 24 49 . 191 . 26 49 . 212 . 13 49 . 131 . 43 49 . 151 . 43 49 . 163 . 25 49 . 191 . 28 49 . 212 . 13 49 . 131 . 44 49 . 151 . 44 49 . 163 . 26 49 . 191 . 30 49 . 212 . 14 49 . 131 . 45 49 . 151 . 47 49 . 163 . 27 49 . 191 . 32 49 . 212 . 14 49 . 131 . 46 49 . 151 . 48 49 . 163 . 29 49 . 191 . 33 49 . 212 . 15 49 . 131 . 47 49 . 151 . 49 49 . 163 . 30 49 . 191 . 33 49 . 212 . 15 49 . 131 . 48 49 . 151 . 51 49 . 163 . 31 49 . 191 . 34 49 . 212 . 16 49 . 131 . 50 49 . 152 .02 49 . 163 . 32 49 . 191 . 35 . 49 . 212 . 16 49 . 131 . 52 49 . 152 . 10 49 . 163 . 33 49 . 191 . 36 49 . 212 . 17 49 . 131 . 53 49 . 152 . 11 49 . 163 . 34 49 . 191 . 37 49 . 212 . 17 49 . 131. 55 49 . 152 . 12 49 . 163 . 35 49 . 191 . 38 49 . 212 . 19 49 . 131 . 58 49 . 152 . 14 49 . 163 . 36 49 . 201 . 03 49 . 212 . 19 49 . 131 . 59 49 . 152 . 19 49 . 163 . 37 49 . 201 . 04 49 . 212 . 20 49 . 131 . 63 49 . 152 . 22 49 . 163 . 38 49 . 201 . 10 49 . 212 . 20 49 . 131 . 64 49 . 152 . 23 49 . 163 . 41 49. 201 . 14 49 . 212 . 21 49 . 131 . 65 49 . 152 . 24 49 . 163 . 42 49 . 201 . 21 49 . 212 . 21 49 . 132 . 02 49 . 152 . 26 49 . 163 . 43 49 . 201 . 24 49 . 213 . 30 49 . 132 . 14 49 . 152 . 27 49 . 163 . 44 49 . 201 . 25 49 . 213 . 30 49 . 132 . 24 49 . 152 . 28 49 . 163 . 45 49 . 201 . 26 49 . 221 . 27 49 . 132 . 25 49 . 152 . 29 49 . 163 . 46 49 . 201 . 31 49 . 221 . 34 49 . 132 . 26 49 . 152 . 31 49 . 163 . 47 49 . 202 . 08 49 . 221 . 44 49 . 132 . 27 49 . 152 . 33 49 . 163 . 48 49 . 202 . 09 49 . 221 . 46 49 . 132 . 28 49 . 152 . 34 49 . 163 . 50 49 . 202 . 10 49 . 221 . 49 0 0 EXHIBIT "A" 1987 Weed Abatement Program Page 9 49 . 221 . 52 49 . 241 . 24 49 . 271 . 22 49 . 311 . 01 50 . 071 . 24 49 . 221 . 54 49 . 241 . 25 49 . 280 . 01 49 . 311 . 02 50 .071 . 25 49 . 221 . 55 49 . 241 . 27 49 . 281 . 02 49 . 311 . 03 50 . 071 . 31 49 . 221 . 56 49 . 241 . 30 49 . 281 . 03 49 . 322 . 05 50 . 071 . 32 49 . 221 . 57 49 . 241 . 33 49 . 281 . 04 49 . 322 . 07 50 . 071 . 35 49 . 221 . 58 49 . 241 . 36 49 . 281 . 07 49 . 322. 08 50 . 091 . 07 49 . 221 . 59 49 . 241 . 37 49 . 281 . 08 49 . 323 . 02 50 . 091 . 13 49 . 221 .60 49 . 241. 38 49 . 281 . 09 49 . 331 . 01 50 .091 . 32 49 . 222 . 38 49 . 241. 39 49 . 281 . 10 49 . 331 . 02 50 . 091 . 33 49 . 222 . 39 49 . 241 . 40 49 . 281 . 11 49 . 331 .03 50 . 092 .08 49 . 222 . 41 49 . 251 . 16 49 . 301 . 01 49 . 331 .04 50 . 092 . 10 49 . 222 . 43 49 . 251 . 18 49 . 301 .02 49 . 331 . 05 50 . 092 . 16 49 . 222 . 46 49 . 251 . 18 49 . 301 . 03 49 . 331 .06 50 . 101 .01 49 . 222 . 57 49 . 251 . 19 49 . 301 . 05 49 . 331 . 07 50 . 111 . 04 49 . 222 . 64 49 . 251 . 20 49 . 301 . 08 49 . 331 . 08 50 . 111 . 10 49 . 223 . 05 49 . 251 . 22 49 . 301 . 09 49 . 331 . 09 50 . 111 . 12 49 . 223 .08 49 . 251 . 33 49 . 301 . 10 49 . 331 . 11 50 . 121 . 10 49 . 223 . 29 49 . 251 . 33 49 . 301 . 12 49. 331 . 13 50 . 121 . 13 49 . 223 . 30 49 . 251 . 34 49 . 301 . 13 49 . 331 . 14 50 . 131 . 02 49 . 223 . 33 49 . 251 . 34 49 . 301 . 14 49 . 331 . 15 50 . 131 . 04 49 . 223 . 34 49 . 251 . 35 49 . 301 . 14 50 . 131 . 05 49 . 224 . 26 49 . 251 . 35 49 . 301 . 15 50 . 131 . 14 49 . 231 .01 49 . 251 . 36 49 . 301 . 16 50 . 012 . 13 50 . 131 . 16 49 . 231 . 02 49 . 251 . 36 49 .301 . 16 50 .012 . 14 50 . 131 . 20 49 . 231 . 03 49 . 251 . 37 49 . 301 . 16 50 . 012 . 18 50 . 131 . 26 49 . 231 . 11 49 . 251 . 37 49 . 301 . 17 50 . 012 . 19 50 . 131 . 27 49 . 231 . 12 49. 251 . 38 49 . 301 . 17 50 . 012 . 20 50 . 131 . 28 49 . 231 . 14 49 . 251 . 38 49 . 301 . 17 50 . 012 . 21 50 . 131 . 29 49 . 231 . 15 49 . 251 . 39 49 . 301 . 18 50 . 012 . 24 50 . 131 . 30 49 . 232 . 10 49 . 251 . 39 49 . 301 . 19 50 . 012 . 25 50 . 141 . 08 49 . 232 . 12 49 . 251 . 40 49 . 301 . 19 50 . 021 . 02 50. 141 . 09 49 . 232 . 13 49 . 251 . 41 49 . 301 . 20 50 .021 . 04 50 . 141 . 25 49 . 232 . 16 49 . 251 . 42 49 . 301 . 20 50 . 021 . 04 50 . 152 . 17 49 . 232 . 18 49 . 251 . 43 49 . 301 . 21 50 . 021 . 13 50 . 153 . 04 49 . 232 . 19 49 . 251 . 44 49 . 301 . 21 50 . 021 .14 50 . 153 . 05 49 . 232 . 20 49 . 251 . 45 49 . 301 . 23 50. 021 . 23 50 . 153 . 09 49 . 232 . 21 49 . 252 . 05 49 . 301 . 24 50 . 021 . 26 50 . 173 . 02 49 . 232 . 22 49 . 252 . 07 49 . 301 . 25 50 . 021 . 28 50 . 173 . 06 49 . 232 . 25 49 . 252 . 08 49 . 301 . 27 50 . 021 . 29 50 . 173 . 12 49 . 232 . 27 49 . 262 . 01 49 . 301 . 28 50 . 021 . 31 50 . 173 . 19 49 . 232 . 28 49 . 262 . 02 49 . 301 . 29 50 . 021 . 31 50 . 202 . 11 49 . 232 . 29 49 . 262 . 03 49 . 301 . 30 50 . 021 . 32 50 . 202 . 12 49 . 232 . 31 49 . 262 . 07 49 . 301 . 31 50 . 021 . 32 50 . 203 . 10 49 . 232 . 32 49 . 262 . 27 49 . 301 . 32 50 . 031 . 19 50 . 211 . 03 49 . 232 . 33 49 . 262 . 31 49 . 301 . 33 50 . 031 . 20 50 . 212 . 08 49 . 232 . 34 49 . 262 . 35 49 . 301 . 36 50 . 042 . 01 50 . 221 . 15 49 . 232 . 35 49 . 262 . 36 49 . 301 . 38 50 . 042 . 02 50 . 221 . 23 49 . 241 . 08 49 . 271 . 01 49 . 302 . 02 50 . 042 . 08 50 . 231 . 04 49 . 241 . 09 49 . 271 . 02 49 . 302 . 04 50 . 042 . 10 50 . 231 . 05 49 . 241 . 19 49 . 271 . 10 49 . 302 . 05 50 .061 . 03 50 . 231 . 10 49 . 241 . 20 49 . 271 . 16 49. 302 . 06 50 . 061 . 09 50 . 231 . 11 49 . 241 . 21 49 . 271 . 17 49 . 302 . 08 50 . 062 . 01 50 . 231 . 19 49 . 241 . 22 49 . 271 . 20 49 . 302 . 09 50 . 063 . 01 50 . 231 . 20 49 . 241 . 23 49 . 271 . 21 49 . 302 .10 50 . 071 . 12 50 . 232 . 08 • 0 EXHIBIT "A" 1987 Gleed Abatement Program Page 10 50 . 241. 02 54 . 012 . 40 54 . 072 . 02 54 . 121 . 33 54 . 171 . 23 50 . 242 . 03 54 . 013 . 02 54 . 072 . 06 54 . 121 . 35 54 . 171 . 24 50 . 242 . 04 54 . 013 . 18 54 . 072 .23 54 . 121 . 37 54 . 171 . 25 50 . 242 . 05 54 . 021 . 01 54 .072 . 33 54 . 121 . 38 54 . 171 . 26 50 . 242 . 07 54 . 021 . 02 54 . 072 . 34 54 . 121 . 40 54 . 171 . 27 50 . 262 . 03 54 . 021 . 13 54 .072 . 41 54 . 122 . 18 54 .181 . 21 50 . 262 . 11 54 . 021 . 18 54 . 072 . 48 54 . 122 . 22 54 . 201 . 06 50 . 271 . 06 54 . 021 . 19 54 .072. 60 54 . 122 . 25 54 . 201 . 12 50 . 271 . 12 54 . 021 . 20 54 .072 . 61 54 . 122 . 27 54 . 201 . 19 50 . 271 . 13 54 . 022 . 08 54 . 081 . 14 54 . 122 . 30 54 . 201 . 24 50 . 271 . 15 54 . 022 . 09 54 . 081 . 21 54 . 122 . 31 54 . 201 . 32 50. 281 . 02 54 . 022 . 10 54 .081 . 22 54. 131 . 06 54 . 201 . 34 50. 312 . 11 54 . 022 . 12 54 . 081 . 27 54 . 132 . 25 54 . 201 . 35 50. 322 . 06 54 .022 . 13 54 .081 . 31 54 . 132 . 44 54 . 201 . 36 50. 323 .05 54 .022 . 14 54 . 082 . 35 54 . 132 . 53 54 . 201 . 41 50. 323 . 06 54 . 022 . 17 54 .082 . 44 54 . 132 . 65 54 . 201 . 42 50 . 323 .07 54 .022 . 21 54 .082 . 45 54 . 132 .66 54 . 201 . 44 50. 323 . 14 54 . 031 . 08 54 .083 . 04 54 . 132 . 67 54 . 201 . 47 50. 323 . 18 54 . 031 . 09 54 .084 .01 54 . 142 . 08 54 . 201 . 48 50 . 323 . 20 54 . 031 . 28 54 . 084 . 02 54 . 142 . 13 54 . 201 . 49 50 . 324 .01 54 . 031 . 29 54 .084 .05 54 . 142 . 18 54 . 201 . 50 50 . 324 . 03 54 . 031 . 30 54 . 084. 06 54 . 142 . 23 54 . 201 . 51 50 . 324 . 04 54 . 031 . 31 54 .084 .07 54 . 142 . 27 54 . 211. 05 50 . 324 . 13 54 . 031 . 32 54 . 085 .02 54 . 142 . 28 54 . 211 . 08 50 . 324 . 14 54 . 031 . 34 54 . 085 . 07 54 . 151 . 13 54 . 211 . 10 50 . 324 . 15 54 .031 . 37 54 . 085 . 10 54 . 151 . 13 54 . 212 . 14 50 . 324 . 17 54 . 031 . 39 54 .085 . 16 54 .151 . 21 54 . 212 . 24 50 . 331 . 11 54 . 032 . 22 54 .085. 24 54 . 151 . 21 54 . 212 . 29 50 . 331 . 13 54 . 032 . 51 54 .085 . 25 54 . 151 . 25 54 . 212 . 30 50 . 341 . 04 54 . 042 .62 54 .085 . 28 54 . 151 . 25 54 . 212 .32 50 . 341 . 20 54 . 042 . 68 54 .085 . 32 54 . 151 . 29 54 . 212 . 33 50 . 341 . 26 54 . 042 . 79 54.085 . 38 54 . 151 . 29 54 . 221 . 03 50 . 341 . 27 54 . 051 . 33 54 .085 . 44 54 . 151 . 30 54. 221 . 08 50. 351 . 05 54 . 051 . 41 54 . 085 . 49 54 . 151 . 30 54 . 221 . 11 50 . 351 .06 54 . 051 . 46 54 .086 . 03 54 . 151 . 31 54 . 231 . 07 50 . 351 . 06 54 . 051 . 47 54 . 086 . 04 54 . 151 . 33 54 . 231 . 19 50 . 351 .07 54 . 051 . 56 54 . 086 . 08 54 . 151 . 35 54 . 231 . 21 50 . 351 . 09 54 . 051 . 63 54 . 086 . 10 54 . 151 . 39 54 . 231 . 22 50 . 351 . 11 54 . 051 . 69 54 .086 . 15 54 . 151 . 42 54 . 231 . 31 50 . 361 . 05 54 . 051 . 70 54 .086 . 17 54 . 151 . 43 54 . 231 . 34 54 .051 . 71 54 . 091 . 13 54 . 151 . 45 54 . 231 . 35 54 . 051 . 73 54 . 091 . 14 54 . 151 . 55 54 . 231 . 38 54 . 011 . 11 54 . 061 . 10 54 . 091 . 17 54 . 161 . 06 54 . 231 . 39 54 . 011 . 12 54 . 061 . 37 54 . 091 . 22 54 . 161 . 07 54 . 231 . 40 54 . 011 . 13 54 . 061 . 40 54 . 091 . 24 54 . 161 . 08 54 . 231 . 42 54 . 011 . 17 54 . 061 . 41 54 .092 . 02 54 . 161 . 09 54 . 231 . 44 54 . 011 . 18 54 . 061 . 43 54 . 092 . 14 54 . 162 . 02 54 . 241 . 18 54 . 011 . 20 54 . 061 . 45 54 . 092 . 20 54 . 162 . 04 54 . 241 . 37 54 . 012 . 02 54 . 061 . 48 54 . 102 . 11 54 . 162 . 05 54 . 241 . 38 54 . 012 . 16 54 . 061 . 50 54 . 102 . 13 54 . 162 . 06 54 . 261 . 01 54 . 012 . 27 54 . 061 . 58 54 . 102 . 18 54 . 162 . 07 54 . 261 . 03 54 . 012 . 35 54 . 061 . 59 54 . 111 . 39 54 . 162 . 08 54 . 261 . 04 54 . 012 . 36 54 . 071 . 01 54. 121 . 21 54 . 171 . 06 54 . 261 . 09 54 . 012 . 38 54 . 071 . 02 54 . 121 . 32 54 . 171 . 21 54 . 272 .06 0 0 EXHIBIT "A" 1987 Weed Abatement Program Page 11 54 . 272 . 15 54 . 322 . 09 55 . 071 . 15 55 . 321 . 87 56 . 101 . 10 54 . 272 . 16 54 . 331 . 04 55 . 072 . 05 55 . 331 . 01 56 . 101 . 11 54 . 272 . 19 54 . 331 . 05 55 .081 . 05 55 . 331 . 11 56 . 101 . 27 54 . 281 . 07 54 . 331 . 06 55 . 082 .05 55 . 341 . 01 56 . 111 . 13 54. 281 . 10 54 . 331 . 10 55 . 082 . 07 55 . 341 . 03 56 . 111 . 15 54 . 281 . 12 54 . 332 . 04 55 . 093 . 02 55 . 361 . 06 56 . 111 . 19 54 . 281 . 15 54 . 332 . 05 55 . 101 . 01 55 . 431 . 01 56 . 111 . 23 54. 281 . 16 54 . 332 . 09 55 . 101 . 04 55. 431 . 02 56 . 111 . 24 54 . 291 . 14 54 . 332 . 10 55 . 101 . 07 55 . 431 . 03 56 . 111 . 25 54 . 291 . 16 54 . 332 . 11 55 . 101 . 09 55 . 441 . 01 56 . 111 . 27 54 . 291 . 17 54 . 332 . 13 55 . 101 . 14 55 . 441 . 04 56 . 111 . 30 54 . 291 . 19 54 . 333 . 07 55 . 101 . 15 55 . 441 .05 56 . 111 . 31 54 . 291 . 21 54.334 . 01 55 . 101 . 16 55 . 442 . 01 56 . 111 . 34 54 . 301 . 13 55 . 102.01 55 .452 . 01 56 . 121 . 02 54 . 301 . 16 55 . 102 .07 55 . 452 . 03 56 . 121 . 05 54 . 301 . 20 55 .011 . 07 55 . 102 . 11 56 . 121 . 14 54 . 301 . 21 55 .031 . 40 55 . 121 . 13 56 . 121 . 17 54 . 301 . 22 55 . 041 . 03 55 . 121. 14 56 .031 . 33 56 . 121 . 27 54. 301 . 23 55 . 041 .06 55 . 121 . 15 56 . 031 . 36 56 . 131 . 17 54. 301 . 25 55 . 041 . 12 55 . 121 . 18 56 .031 . 37 56 . 131 . 18 54 . 301 . 26 55 . 041 . 13 55 . 131 .01 56 .031 . 38 56 . 131 . 19 54 . 301 . 27 55 . 041 . 14 55 . 131 . 10 56 . 031 . 41 56 . 141 . 09 54 . 311 . 03 55 .051 . 02 55 . 131 . 13 56 . 031 . 42 56 . 141 . 17 54 . 311 . 05 55 . 051 . 08 55 . 141 . 05 56 .041 . 14 56 . 151 . 05 54 . 311 . 08 55 . 051 . 09 55 . 141 . 06 56 . 041 . 20 56 . 151 . 09 54 . 311 . 16 55 . 051 . 10 55 . 141 . 09 56 .041 . 34 56 . 151 . 21 54 . 311 . 19 55 . 051 . 11 55 . 151 . 05 56 . 051 . 30 56 . 151 . 29 54 . 311 . 20 55 . 051 . 12 55 . 151 . 07 56 .051 . 43 56 . 151 . 30 54 . 311 . 21 55 . 052 . 02 55 . 151 .08 56 .051 . 47 56 . 151 . 31 54 . 311 . 22 55 .052 . 03 55 . 151 . 09 56 . 051 . 49 56 . 151 . 32 54 . 311 . 29 55 . 052 . 09 55 . 151 . 13 56 . 051 . 50 56 . 151 . 35 54 . 311 .31 55 .052 . 14 55 . 151 . 16 56 . 051 . 51 56 . 151 . 40 54 . 311 . 33 55 . 053 . 01 55 . 191 . 09 56 . 061 . 22 56. 162 . 12 54 . 311 . 37 55 . 053 . 04 55 . 201 . 02 56 . 061 . 24 56 . 162 . 13 54 . 311 . 38 55 . 053 . 05 55 . 201 . 07 56 . 061 . 26 56 . 162 . 14 54 . 311 . 40 55 . 053 . 06 55 . 201 . 08 56 . 071 . 10 56 . 162 . 15 54 . 311 . 41 55 .061 . 03 55 . 201 . 13 56 .071 . 11 56 . 162 . 16 54 . 311 . 42 55 . 062 . 19 55 . 201 . 14 56 .081 . 08 56 . 162 . 20 54 . 311 . 43 55 . 062 . 20 55 . 201 . 15 56 . 081 . 15 56 . 162 . 21 54 . 311 . 44 55 . 062 . 22 55 . 201. 16 56 .081 . 26 56 . 162 . 22 54 . 311 . 45 55 . 062 . 23 55 . 201 . 19 56 . 081 . 28 56 . 162 . 23 54 . 311 . 46 55 . 062 . 24 55 . 201 . 20 56 . 081 . 29 56 . 162 . 27 54 . 311 . 47 55 . 062 . 27 55 . 242 . 14 56 . 091 . 17 56 . 162 . 29 54 . 311 . 48 55 . 062 . 28 55 . 242 . 15 56 . 091 . 26 56 . 162 . 31 54 . 311 . 49 55 .062 . 31 55 . 242 . 26 56 . 091 . 29 56 . 171 . 37 54 . 311 . 51 55 . 062 . 32 55 . 243 . 02 56 . 091 . 35 56 . 181 . 03 54 . 311 . 52 55 . 062 . 33 55 . 251 . 01 56 . 091 . 36 56 . 181 . 08 54 . 311 . 53 55 . 062 . 35 55 . 252 . 12 56 . 091 . 37 56 . 181 . 12 54 . 311 . 54 55 . 062 . 40 55 . 261 . 02 56 . 091 . 38 56 . 181 . 13 54 . 321 . 02 55 . 062. 41 55 . 261 . 06 56 . 091 . 39 56 . 181 . 14 54 . 321 .09 55 . 062 . 42 55 . 311 . 08 56 . 091 . 40 56 . 181 . 18 54 . 321 . 10 55 . 071 . 01 55 . 311 . 09 56 . 091 . 43 56 . 181 . 19 54 . 321 . 12 55 . 071 . 12 55 . 311 . 10 56 . 101 . 05 56 . 191 . 29 54 . 322 . 03 55 . 071 . 14 55 . 311 . 14 56 . 101 . 07 56 . 191 . 31 0 0 EXHIBIT "A" 1987 Weed Abatement Program Page 12 56 . 201 . 03 56 . 261 . 72 56 . 322 . 28 56 . 411 . 20 56 . 491 . 22 56 . 201 . 12 56 . 261 . 72 56 . 322 . 29 56 . 411 . 20 56 . 491 . 23 56 . 201 . 21 56 . 261 . 73 56 . 322 . 32 56 . 411 . 21 56 . 491 . 23 56 . 201 . 24 56 . 261 . 75 56 . 322 . 37 56 . 411 . 22 56 . 491 . 24 56 . 201 . 29 56 . 261 . 78 56 . 322 . 38 56 . 411 . 23 56 . 491 . 26 56 . 201 . 30 56 . 262 . 01 56 . 322 . 39 56 . 411 . 24 56 . 491 . 30 56 . 201 . 33 56 . 262 . 04 56 . 351 . 09 56 . 431 . 01 56 . 211 . 03 56 . 262 . 12 56 . 351 . 14 56 . 432 .01 56 . 211 . 12 56 . 262 . 13 56 . 351 . 23 56 . 432 . 02 56 . 211. 15 56 . 262 . 22 56 . 351 . 24 56 . 432 . 03 56 . 211 . 20 56 . 271 . 11 56 . 351 . 26 56 . 432 . 04 56 . 211 . 22 56 . 271 . 25 56 . 351 . 27 56 . 432 .05 56 . 211 . 33 56 . 271 . 26 56 . 351 . 28 56 . 451 . 01 56 . 211 . 44 56 . 271 . 31 56 . 351 . 29 56 . 451 . 02 56 . 211 . 46 56 . 271 . 33 56 . 351 . 31 56 . 451 . 03 56 . 211 . 47 56 . 271 . 34 56 . 351 . 33 56 . 451 . 04 56 . 221 . 14 56 . 271 . 37 56 . 351 . 34 56 . 451 .05 56 . 221 . 20 56 . 271 . 39 56 . 351 . 35 56 . 451 . 06 56 . 221 . 22 56 . 271 . 40 56 . 351 . 36 56 . 451 .07 56 . 221 . 23 56 . 281 . 07 56 . 351 . 37 56 . 451 . 10 56 . 221 . 25 56 . 281 . 09 56 . 351 . 41 56 . 471 .01 56 . 221 . 27 56 . 281 . 10 56 . 351 . 42 56 . 471 . 02 56 . 231 . 16 56 . 291 . 01 56 . 351 .43 56 . 471 . 03 56 . 231 . 18 56 .291 . 08 56 .371 . 23 56 . 471 . 04 56 . 231 . 20 56 . 301 . 08 56 . 371 . 24 56 . 471 . 05 56 . 231 . 21 56 . 301 . 09 56 . 371 . 25 56 . 471. 06 56 . 241 .07 56 . 301 . 11 56 . 371 . 26 56 . 471 . 07 56 . 241 . 10 56 . 301 . 32 56 . 371 . 31 56 . 471. 08 56 . 241 . 12 56 . 301 . 38 56 . 371 . 35 56 . 471 . 10 56 . 241 . 16 56 . 311 . 02 56 . 371 . 37 56 . 471 . 11 56 . 241. 18 56 . 311 . 10 56 . 371 . 38 56 . 471 . 12 56 . 242 . 05 56 . 311 . 12 56 .381 .09 56 . 472 . 01 56 . 242 . 06 56 . 311 . 13 56 . 381 . 21 56 . 472 . 02 56 . 242 . 07 56 . 312 . 03 56 . 381 . 23 56 . 472 . 03 56 . 251 .03 56 . 312 . 04 56 . 402 . 01 56 . 472 . 04 56 . 251 .09 56 . 312 .08 56 . 402 . 02 56 . 472 . 05 56 . 251 . 10 56 . 312 . 14 56 . 402 . 03 56 . 481 . 03 56 . 251 . 11 56 . 312 . 15 56 . 402 . 04 56 . 481 . 04 56 . 251 . 14 56 . 312 . 21 56 . 402 . 05 56 . 481 . 05 56 . 251 . 15 56 .312 . 26 56 . 411 . 01 56 . 481 . 06 56 . 251 . 16 56 . 312 . 27 56 . 411 . 03 56 . 481 . 09 56 . 251 . 17 56 . 312 . 31 56 . 411 . 04 56 . 481 . 10 56 . 261 . 04 56 . 312 . 32 56 . 411 . 05 56 . 491 . 01 56 . 261 . 11 56 . 312 . 46 56 . 411 . 06 56 . 491 . 04 56 . 261 . 13 56 . 322 . 01 56 . 411 . 07 56 . 491 . 05 56 . 261 . 18 56 . 322 . 06 56 . 411 . 08 56 . 491 . 06 56 . 261. 19 56. 322 . 06 56 . 411 . 11 56 . 491 . 07 56 . 261 . 25 56 . 322 . 16 56 . 411 . 12 56 . 491 . 10 56 . 261 .42 56 . 322 . 17 56 . 411 . 14 56 . 491 . 12 56 . 261 . 68 56 . 322 . 18 56 . 411 . 15 56 . 491 . 13 56 . 261 . 69 56 . 322 . 19 56 . 411 . 16 56 . 491 . 14 56 . 261 . 69 56 . 322 . 20 56 . 411 . 17 56 . 491 . 15 56 .261 . 70 56 . 322 .23 56 . 411 . 18 56 . 491 . 17 56 . 261 . 71 56 . 322 . 26 56 . 411 . 19 56 . 491 . 19 1,A iNG AGENDA D , ITEM MEMORANDUM TO: BOARD OF DIRECTORS-ATASCADERO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT THROUGH: MICHAEL SHELTON, CITY MANAGER L&A-1-A FROM: PAUL M, SEEN IBAUGH, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGENEER SUBJECT : INFLOW AND INFILTRATION ANALYSIS PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the board authorize the Director of Public Works to advertise for bids for the cleaning, tv-monitoring, and smoke testing for the existing sewer system as presented in the current budget . BACKROUND: The sewer study conducted by John Wallace and Associates as well as the grant facilities plan presented by Engineering Sciences expressed the importance of an inflow and infiltration (I &I) analysis and implementation to increase the life of the wastewater treatment • plant . The I & I analysis was somewhat informally done in-house since the start of the fiscal year . A normal cleaning schedule has been layed by sanitation personnel and an investigation of services available was conducted by the Director, as well as associated costs . The winter of 1985 showed an increase in discharge to the plant of 3.7 times the average daily flow during the rainy season . Normal infiltration is about 20% with peaks up to about 2 .O times the average daily flow. The current average daily flow is approximately 1 .0 million gallons per day (mgd) . Thus , about 2 .7 mgd of the peak flow in 1985 , which came after the sewer study indicated 3 .2 as a historic figure, represents storm water intrusion . The storm water enters via joints or cracks in the sewers (infiltration) , or into manhole lids or manhole joints/cracks or other inlets (inflow) . The latter, or other, inlets could be street or parking lot storm drains , roof drains or a drainage open channel finding its way along a sewer trench to a large crack or opening. DISCUSSION: The problem is clear , the solutions are less obvious since the cause of the problem is an unknown . Cleaning of the lines ,which has never been completely done except for problem areas due to minimal slope, is the first step in the process . Cleaning not only readies the lines for the tv-monitoring but can give a good idea of which areas should be monitored. Areas of large breaks and sags can be detected by cleaning by the type of draggings such as sand or pieces of pipe. • Tv-monitoring can locate exactly cracks , joints , storm drain intlets , roof drain intlets , etc . The records from this process are invalueable for future reference. Smoke testing can also be conducted to find sorces of roof drains or other illegal taps . The above processes will help determine not only where and what the problem is , but whether it is more economical to fix the problem or to expand the plant to accept the water . It is noted here that not only does non-polluted water use up mainline and .plant capacity and make treatment more difficult due to dilution but it is illegal by our own rule to allow such acceptance of flow. Staff is recommending to bid the project on unit prices with an estimated quantity that can be controlled by the Director as work progresses . Contractors will bid on cleaning, tv-monitoring, and smoke testing and may be awarded as few as one or as much as all items . Thus two or more different contractors may be awarded the bid based upon their expertise and price of work. All work will be based upon a linear footage of sewer main . It is the intent to clean the entire system but to only tv-monitor the areas designated by the Director . Actual corrections to the system will be conducted in the next fiscal year based upon the results of the above project . It should e understood that sometimes problem sorces can be found that can easily be corrected and in that sence their is somewhat of a risk overdoing the tv-monitoring. Corrections may include removing illegal roof drains , elimination of storm drains , water proofing manholes , sealing cracks in sewer main joints , slip lining sewer mains or completely removing and replacing inadequate lines . It is anticipated that the bulk of the work will be necessary in the older downtown section of the system where the sewers are slip joints and roof drains are evident . Flat areas such as Morro Flats is suspect of drainage I & I especially when the ground is saturated. FISCAL ANALYSIS: There are over 38 miles , or over 200, 000 linear feet , of sewer mains . Cleaning and bucketing ranges from 20 cents/l . f . to 27 c/l . f . with root cutting as much as 40 c/l . f . Tv-monitoring is estimated from 30 c/l . f . to 50 c/l . f . , and smoke testing about 15 c/l .f . If the entire system was done for all items the price could reach about $150, 000 . It is anticipated that all of the sewer will be cleaned and only about half will tv-monitored and perhaps only 25% smoke tested. The estimate for that work is about $90, 000. The budget includes $250, 000 . The balance of funds will carry over into the next budget year' s corrective items . The current sewer fee structure include I & I work, future line replacement and expansion , sludge handling, and future lift station and plant improvements replacement . The above work fits into the buildout projection used establish the fees . 0*ram r< L fly+ � �X �� , +y., '� _. '. e.-. • e � .,, --" +. ■ INFILTRATION/INFLOW surveys used smoke testing for identification of manhole frame seal inflow sources. C&M, Ift- necofttiveh n ww'"sL 47 m &ft,.I I Re%his"Dilitation WILLIAM C. CARTER, P.E. discharge to receiving streams during lation of flow meters and rain gauges RICHARD J. NOGAJ, P.E. moderate rainfall events for the past were selected. Flow monitoring was and 30 years. Construction of about performed at 45 key locations ALAN J. HOLLENBECK, P.E. 250,000 linear ft of supplemental relief throughout the Mission Township dis- sewers and three side stream holding trict while rainfall monitoring was Mr. Carter is senior engineer with the facilities in the 1960s and a voluntary conducted at two locations. Flow Johnson County Unified Wastewater Dis downspout disconnection program in meters and rain gauges were oper- tricts,Johnson County,Kansas.Mr.Nogaj the 1970s did not prevent sewer ated from mid-March 1984 to mid- is president and Mr. Hollenbeck is an as- backups or the discharge of untreated June, 1984. The operation of wet sociate with RJN Environmentals- sociates, Inc., Consulting Engineers, wastewater into the receiving weather holding stations and activity Wheaton, Illinois. streams. In addition, the connection of sewer bypasses were also and discharge of many of the monitored. Flow data were used to COMMUNITIES and sewer agen- downspouts remains unknown. evaluate system behavior and to de- cies needing sewer improve- In an effort to provide improved termine the base wastewater flow ments have been reluctant to under- sanitary sewer service to JCUWD (dry weather/low ground water),infil- take major sewer rehabilitation pro- customers and to reduce the bypass- tration (dry weather/high ground grams largely due to the cost to quan- ing of wastewater into the receiving water) and inflow (wet weather/high tify the need and the lack of funds streams, JCUWD retained RJN En- grount water) quantities. needed to implement the required vironmental Associates, Inc. to con- Base, infiltration, and inflow rates improvements. Also, in many cases duct an initial sanitary sewer study of were determined from the monitored sewer studies have not resulted in on- MTMSD No. 1. Project objectives data.Initially,inflow rates that would going survey and maintenance activi- were established to: identify existing be generated during a one-year.rain- ties. That is, the sewer study is not conditions, develop alternative so- fall event were determined. Inflow used as a basis for system manage- lutions with cost estimates, and pro- was estimated by developing a rela- ment. vide an implementation plan based on tionship between inflow and rainfall Johnson County Unified Waste- the selected solution. The scope of intensity with a technique reported by water Districts(JCUWD), despite po- work was developed for selected Hollenbeck and Nogaj.l tential difficulties, is proceeding with areas to provide a sound basis for de- Average daily base flow was de- sewer improvements in a major veloping cost estimates for the re- termined to be 3.6 mgd or about 207 watershed known as Mission Town- quired improvements(without having gallons per building per day. The ship Main Sewer District No. 1 to initially perform a comprehensive diurnal variation in base flow rates (MTMSD). The watershed includes investigation throughout MTMSD resulted in an average measured base about 1.3 million linear ft of sewer No. 1.) flow peaking factor of 1.52,where the line, 17,500 residences, and nine mu- Flow Data.Existing sanitary sewer base flow peaking factor is defined as nicipalities. maps were used for defining sewer the ratio of the peak hourly flow to Residents-in the MTMSD service tributary areas or basins. MTMSD total daily flow. Peak infiltration was area have experienced sanitary No. 1 was divided into 42 sanitary determined to be slightly over 9.8 mgd sewer backups in their basements sewer basins. After determining or about 2.7 times average base flow. and there has been raw wastewater basin boundaries,locations for instal- The unit infiltration rate, based on 64 PUBLIC WORKS for October, 1986 pipe diameter and length intosani- • tary sewer system, was 5,700 gallons per day per inch-diameter mile (gpd/ Table 2— Typical Rehabilitation and Construction Costs idm). Peak one-year inflow was de- Rehabilitation Estimated termined to be 96.8 mgd or nearly 27 1/1 Source Method Cost times the average base flow rate. The ponding Manhole Replace Manhole Cover $100 one-year unit inflow rate was 48,800 Pick Hole Inflow Replace Manhole Cover 100 gpd/idm. Corbel Leak Grout Corbel 200 I/I Source Data. To obtain an esti- Cracked Manhole Wall _ Chisel Cracks and Grout 375 mate of the total infiltration and inflow Cracked Pipe Seal Chisel Cracks and Grout 200 (I/I)sources within the MTMSD,six of Cracked Bench/Trough Grout Joint 200 the 42 basins were selected for inten- Cracked Frame Seal Adjust Frame and Seal 360 sive investigation. The six selected Storm Connection Repair as necessary' 7,000-8,000 basins had high inflow rates,included Direct Storm Sump Repipe to Grade 800 several different communities, and Direct Storm Sump Remove Diverter Valve 300 were geographically distributed With Diverter throughout the district. Downspouts Redirect Downspouts 100 The intensive survey of the six ba- Foundation Drain Connect New Storm Sump 5,2003 sins included the following activities: Unsealed Pump Seal Pump with Concrete2 200 ♦ Manhole and visual pipe inspec- Suspect Building Replace Building Sewer 4,0003 tions. Sewer ♦ Internal and external building Cleanout Repair as necessary 250 inspections. Collapsed Pipe Replace Pipe(Each ♦ Smoke testing. 5 ft Section)' 4,300-6,000 ♦ Dye water testing of public and Building Sewer Replace Pipe 1,200 private sector I/I sources. Combination Sump Seal Old Pump/Install ♦ Television inspection of selected New Sump 1,800 sewer lines.A comparison between I/I source Driveway Drain Disconnect Drain/Install data and monitored flow data was de- pump 2,200Transition Joint Repair as necessary 800 termined.For the purposes of analyz- ing all of the MTMSD, the relative Manhole Frame Replace Manhole Frame 175 proportion of each type of I/I source 'Unit cost will vary with pipe diameter, number of repairs per line segment, and identified in the intense study was required surface restoration. applied throughout the entire district. 2Actual recommended repairs will depend on the use of the existing pump as a storm From the study 22.5 percent of the sump pump, a sanitary sump pump,or both. infiltration was identified, including 3Generally not cost-effective to repair. 13.9 percent from defective manhole walls, 1.4 percent from defective pipe seals, 0.3 percent from defective bench/troughs, and 6.9 percent from _ defective joints and broken pipe. It was further determined that the pub- r lic sector produced 27.1 percent of the _ ;F Table 1 — Distribution of Inflow Sources �.,Y_" Percent Source Inflow Public Sector Inflow Manhole Cover/Frames 5.6 Manhole Frame Seals 14.4 Manhole Corbels 7.1 Storm Connections 0.1 Private Sector Inflow - Storm Sumps 1.3 . : Storm with Diverter Valves 0.1 Combination Sumps 1.5 Unsealed Sumps 0.2 4 Suspect Storm Sumps 0.9 Downspouts 1.1 Suspect Downspouts 2.1 Foundation Drains 2.1 Suspect Foundation Drains 41.6 ■ VISUAL in of manhole revealed this infiltration source at a pipe seal. ea 0.2 AreaDrains Area Drains 2.6 Suspect Area Drains 5.1 0 Transition Joints 0.1 Leaking Service Lateral 0.1 Suspect Leaking Service Lateral 14.0 PUBLIC WORKS for October, 1986 65 • tion cost was converted to capital cost 5-YEAR STORM INFLOW (MGD) by using a service and contingency factor of 27 percent for legal and fiscal 0 26 52 78 104 130 156 costs, administration, engineering, 70.0 and other expenses. Cost estimates LEGEND were based on an ENR index of 4168 \ ACTUAL DATA as of August, 1984. ` -----PROJECTED COST BASED The four major alternatives derived ` 60.0 \ ON PHASE I INTENSIVE from this study were: \\\\ SURVEY DATA ♦ Alternative "A": No rehabilita- tion of IR sources;construction of new �\\\ sewers; and construction of required 50.0 \ treatment facilities. \ \ TOTAL COSTS ♦ Alternative "B": Removal of I/I co \\\�� sources considered to be cost- s \\\ effective; construction of required new sewers and treatment facilities H J 400 `�\ ALTERNATIVE A -i \\ for the six intensively studied basins. 38 ALTERNATIVE 8 � ♦ Alternative "C": Complete field Z \ (LIMIT OF REHAB \ studies for all of MTMSD No. 1 to lo- F-O `\\ W/ EXISTING DATA) cate and quantify I/I sources;removal N 5 30.0 �\ of I/I sources considered to be cost- Cr effective; and construction of new a \/�` ALTERNATIVE C sewers as required. 9 REHABILITATION J\\�\ �i��' ♦ Alternative "D": Complete field 0 2QO 9 SURVEY COSTS JJ \�\\ ��� studies for all of the MTMSD No. 1 to \ . i locate and quantify I/I sources; re- `\ ` COST-EFFECTIVE moval of I/I sources generally consid- �\ POINT �/ ered cost-effective;and removal of all directly connected foundation drains. 10'0 NEW SEWER TREATMENT The results of the analysis, as COSTS COSTS V _ shown in Figure 1,indicate that alter- _ native"C"would be the least-cost ap- -----_�_�^=--- proach. --- Design Storm.In separate sanitary 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 sewer systems,there is a relationship between inflow and rainfall intensity PERCENT REDUCTION OF FLOW where inflow increases exponentially BY REHABILITATION with storm intensity.'Existing system analysis and new sewer requirements depend on a level of design storm pro- 0 FIGURE 1. Analysis shows Alternative "C" to be most cost-effective. tection; this storm event frequency must be selected for the analysis and subsequent final design. inflow with the remaining 72.9 per- lines. Rehabilitation methods and The marginal cost analysis tech- cent having its source in the private costs used in this study are shown in nique was used to develop the unit sector. The distribution of these in- Table 2. cost for the work necessary to prevent flow sources is listed in Table 1. Treatment and transport costs a surcharge occurrence for flows that Analysis were based on historical capital, op- exceed the system design capacity at eration, and maintenance costs for a given storm frequency as reported Optimization. Cost-effectiveness complete treatment and for wet by Braam and Nogaj.2 Using this analysis was utilized to estimate the weather flow, sidestream treatment. approach a design storm can be optimum level of I/I removal for the New sewer costs were based on selected. New sewer line, treatment, purpose of achieving sanitary sewer preliminary relief sewer require- and IR rehabilitation costs were esti- system integrity. System integrity is ments obtained by using the RJN En- mated with analyses performed at 1-, defined as an operational condition vironmental Sewer System Evalua- 2-,5-, 10-, and 25-year storm frequen- where sewer backups, overflows,or tion Model (SSEM). This model cies. Incremental costs were de- bypasses would not occur up to a routes the projected flow by line seg- veloped at each of these storm fre- specified storm event. The optimum ment and compares the line capacity quency intervals followed by a de- level of I/I removal would correspond to the expected peak flow. Where termination of the unit cost to prevent to the projected least cost alternative. total flow exceeds line capacity the surcharge occurrence. These data Elimination, treatment and trans- model specifies a new sewer line that are shown graphically in Figure 2. port, and new sewer line require- is sized to carry the excess flow.Slope The results of the marginal costs ments were analyzed at several levels and depth of the new line is assumed analysis indicate that a point of di- of infiltration and inflow removal. to be the same as the existing line. minishing return would be experi- Elimination costs were based on the ' Estimated construction cost for the enced somewhere between the estimated construction costs to re- new sewers is based on depth of ex- 5-year and 10-year storm protection move I/I sources. This would include cavation and pipe diameter. level and that the design frequency removal of sources such as storm Total present worth for several al- should be between these two points. sump pumps, downspouts, and area ternatives was compared based on a The 5-year storm protection level drains as well as repairing manhole planning period of 20 years at an would result in, on the average, a frame seals, pipe seals, and sewer interest rate of 8%percent. Construc- backup occurrence twice every 10 66 PUBLIC WORKS for October, 1986 • years(a 20 percent probabilPtyin any be handled by the existing treatment provements early in the program. given year) while the 10-year storm facilities. Perimeter basins will be completed level would result in a backup once Phasing Schedule.The initial idea first so that these basins will not be every 10 years(a 10 percent probabil- toward phasing of the sewer system subject to upstream tributary areas ity in any given year). survey, design, and rehabilitation ac- that could overload areas of rehabi) For cost-effective private sector tivities was based on the magnitude of tation and new sewers. and public sector improvements fi- the unit inflow rate determined for Completion of the work by water- nanced over 20 years, a typical each basin. However, performing shed allows for early evaluation of the homeowner cost based on an average work in this manner would result program. It is estimated that each assessed property evaluation would in having the work "scattered" phase will take about two years to be $55.80 per year for 5-year protec- throughout the district during any complete. Survey and design will tion and $68.30 per year for 10-year given phase.This could result in both proceed concurrently in one phase protection. Based on the computer higher administrative and construc- while construction and rehabilitation modeling and survey work the esti- tion costs. Further, basins with high is being conducted for those basins mated public and private sector capi- unit inflow rates would not necessar- included in a previous phase. The tal cost for 5-year protection was$15.3 ily correlate with the areas where type of sewer rehabilitation is antici- million(or a unit cost of$0.098 million there were known sewer backups. pated to be the same in all phases in- to prevent a surcharge occurrence); Sewer capacity relative to actual eluding public and private sector for the 10-year protection the esti- flows must therefore be considered work. The types of public sector re- mated cost was$18.7 million(or$0.46 when evaluating the potential for habilitation will include manhole re- million to prevent a surcharge occur- backup reduction. pair, sewer line repairs and grouting, rence). The phasing is based on a combina- relief sewers, cross-connection re- The breakdown of work for the 10- tion of watershed location,unit inflow movals,and in-place lining of sewers. year protection program included rate, and the history of sewer Conclusions nearly $1.3 million for the remaining backups.This recommended phasing survey work in the district, $2.5 mil- approach will generally concentrate The"project approach"used in the lion for infiltration elimination, $3.1 the survey and construction activities Mission District study can be applied million for inflow removal in the pub- in the same geographical areas thus to provide information for determin- lic sector, nearly$3 million for inflow lowering construction and adminis- ing the total cost of proceeding with removal in the private sector, and trative costs. Work will generally be survey, design, and construction ac- over$8.8 million for new sewer lines. phased according to the watershed tivities. This enables planners to Treatment of the remaining UI could thereby producing measurable im- evaluate the work based on economic feasibility. In addition, the level of ■ FIGURE 2. The relationship of cost for protection and design storm. protection against peak flow during wet weather conditions can be selected from the partial survey dat 1400 25-YEAR STORM The grouping of the work by geo graphical areas allows an early evalu- 1300 ation of the program and helps control construction costs and area construc- 1200 tion activity. The Mission District study indicates that system flow 1100 monitoring and selective survey in- vestigation can achieve the following: zI000 ♦ Provide cost-effective evaluation W¢ of sewer rehabilitation alternatives. eoo ♦ Project the total system rehabili- tation cost. o_ ♦ Develop a rationale for the selec- w soo tion of a storm design level of protec- a tion. 0 Too ♦ Determine a phasing schedule for implementation of a selected so- 0 600 lution. 01:10 Q.I 10-YEAR STORM zcn 0 500-- Acknowledgment. Data used in this w V study were obtained during the sewer sur- a 400 vey conducted by RJN Environmental and funded by the Johnson County Unified 1 300 Wastewater Districts.This article is based y on a paper presented at the Water Pollu- U 200 tion Control Federation Conference held 5-YEAR STORM in Kansas City, Missouri, October 1985. loo 2-YEAR sTORM References 1."One Technique for Estimating Inflow 0 with Surcharge Conditions."Richard J 0 10 20 30 40 Nogaj and Alan J. Hollenbeck,JournaW TOTAL PRESENT WORTH WPCF, April 1981. (MILLION DOLLARS) 2•"Selection of Optimum Storm Fre- quency for Sewer Studies." Richard J. Nogaj and George A. Braam, Journal WPCF, October 1982. PUBLIC WORKS for October, 1986 67 } ! • MEMORANDUM TO: BOARD OF DIRECTORS-ATASCADERO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT THROUGH: MICHAEL SHELTON, CITY MANAGER jU� , FROM: PAUL CA SIBAUGH, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER SUBJECT : CHANGE ORDER REQUEST-ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 3 (MtRCHANT WAY) DATE April 21 , 1987 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that West Coast and Tank and Pipe be awarded a net change order of $5 ,870 over the original contract amount and not the $35 , 330 .50 requested. BACKROUND: Attached are several memos from the contractor and the consulting engineer regarding change orders for rock excavation and other miscellaneous items including time extensions . The February 20 memo from Cuesta Engineering summarizes the engineer' s position to the final pay estimate . This project is one for which the FmHA loan extension was requested at 5% interest since the state statute only allows the District to charge a maximum of 6% since this project is being financed through the ACSD. The point of this discussion is that FmHA will make a final inspection and will make a finding on all change orders . It is anticipated that once the loan is finally approved FmHA will want to clear their books of the $191 ,400 available and may be too anxious for the ACSD to spend their money on change orders . A grant would have less impact since it would not have to be paid back. DISCUSSION: The staff' s starting point for negotiation is where the engineer left off . Staff agrees with the engineer on the recommendations that bring the total project cost to $114 ,722 , without consideration for a change order of $32 ,513.71 for rock encountered on the job. Staff does not agree to waiving the liquidated damages for the 60 days over the time allowed. The contractor himself claims anticipated progress of 200 linear feet per day which for an 1800 foot job would be 9 days for pipe laying. The engineer estimated 30 days completition and the City allowed 45 days in the specifications . The contractor is claiming 11 lost days due to rock for 255 l . f. of rock encountered. He claims normal progress to be 200 l . f ./day at a cost (bid) of $3, 853/day . In all the claim is for $35 , 330.50 over the original contract negotiated price of $117,000 . It is noted here that this job was bid three times at an average bid of about $140,000 , • • From 10/20/86 to 12/29/86 the daily time sheets show 12 day rock encountered. Using the entire day of rock-only, at 20 l . f ./c-- as claimed, 240 l . f . of rock would result . Therefore, the 255 l .f . of rock is agreed upon . Additionally, 12 normal days at a claimed anticipation of 200 l . f ./day would give 2400 l . f . Crediting the 255 l . f . of laying in rock a net of 2140 l . f . is left . At 200 l . f./day, 10 .7 days would result . Therefore, 11 days lost as claimed is plausible. However, the contractor used the method of jack hammering to break the rock. The average cost of that operation was $140/hr . For 11 days the cost of jack hammering would be $12 , 320. A hydro hammer could have been used which costs $48/hr plus and operator . If an operator and a forman were charged at $26/hr each the total cost per hour for the hydro hammer would be about $100/hr. Assuming a hydro hammer will break about 100 l . f./day, or 5 times that of a jack hammer, it would take 2 1/2 days to cut through 255 l .f. of rock. Thus , 2 1/2 days @ $3,853/day as claimed would result in $9,632 for lost time . The cost for the hydro hammer @ 100/hr for 2 1/2 days would be $2 ,000 . Not knowing when rock would be encountered over the eleven days it is fair to assume 8 1/2 days of idle time for the machine @ $48/hr . , or $3,264 . Thus using this procedure the cost of rock would be a total of $14 ,896. However, some rock is normally encountered on projects , say 2% of the total project . For 1800 l . f . @ 2`K this would be 36 l . f of rock or about 1 . 8 days assuming 20 1 per day . For the sake of argument let' s use only one day allowa-0 for rock. Thus the jack hammering for one day would cost about $1 ,120 . Therefore, the net cost for rock above normal would be $13,776. Averaging the $12 ,320 for jack hammering and the rock cost of $13,776, the expected loss is $13, 048 for rock. The engineer arrived at 60 days over the allowable schedule . If 11 days were lost due to rock, then 49 days of liquidated damages are due the City at $100/day , or $4 ,900 . Contractor' s Request : Staff' s Recommendation : $152 , 330 total cost $114 ,722 engineers estimate + 13 . 048 for rock $127,770 sub total - 4 , 900 liquidated dama _es 122 , 870 total cost allowed '$117, 000 original contract $117, 000 orginal contract $ 35 , 330 over contract requested $ 5 , 870 over contract allowed FISCAL IMPACT: The assessment for A.D.No. 3 is fixed at $4 , 150 per parcel . Any change orders will have to be paid out of the sanitation district funds . It was originally assumed that the ASCD would participate in this project since it would help to clean up Atascadero Lake and would eliminate a major cease and desist area . Those theories are still applicable regardless of whether an engineer's estimate or an actual final cost is being considered. The $5 , 870 extra would be expended from the sanitation fund if the change order is awarded. CUES?A ENGINEERING 7401-B EI Camino Real/P.O. Box 2066 Atascadero, California 93423 (805)466-6827 February 20, 1987 Paul Sensibaugh City of Atascadero 6500 Palma P.O. Box 747 Atascadero, California 93423 Subject: Final payment Marchant Sewer Dear Paul : I have received a letter dated February 13, 1987 from West Coast Tank and Pipe outlining their requests for payment for extra work for the subject project. A copy of the letter is attached for your review. The following outline is a breakdown of the extras and deductions that I base my recommendation for final payment on. CONTRACT DEDUCTIONS 1 . ) Liquidated Damages: Liquidated damages amount is based upon Paragraph E of Section G of the contract specifications which states that the deduction amount shall be $100.00 per day over contract time. The project was completed on February 6th. The contract time ended November 30th. Total days over contract is 67. My notes indicate 3 rain days and 4 holidays. Liquidated damages is therefore 60 days at $100.00/day for a total of $6,000.00. The dollar cost to the City for the time delay is reflected in our charges to the City for inspection time over and above our original estimate. The total cost of this work was $6,720.00. Our original estimate for this work was $3,000.00. Therefore the extra 60 days on the job cost the City $3,720.00 in construction inspection fees. In their letter West Coast is claiming an extra cost of $32,513.71 for delays due to encountering rock in the trench excavating. As I stated in my letter to you dated November 26, 1986 the contract specifications do not include provisions for extra payment due to difficult material encountered during trenching. The investigative borings that were made were helpful in terms of groundwater indications but in no way could be relied upon for encountering pointed problems such as rock. The boring logs present only what was encountered in the drilled holes. Any conclusions the contractor made from review of these logs are his own responsibility. CUESTA ENGINEERING 7401-B EI Camino Real/P.O. Box 2066 Atascadero, California 93423 (805)466-6827 From my position as Project Engineer I cannot recommend extra payments as requested in that the project specifications do not support the claim. I recommend that a deduction be made in the ammount of $3,720.00 which represents the added dollar cost to the City for delays on the part of the contractor. The remainder of the liquidated damages can be waived due to the difficult conditions encountered. 2.) Sewer Laterals: Seven sewer laterals were shown on the plans to be constructed to properties which front on Santa Rosa Avenue. Five of these laterals were installed only to the Marchant Way right-of-way line because the easements had not been obtained to continue the work through private property. Sewer laterals were listed as $600.00 each on the bid documents. I recommend a deduction of $450.00 for each lateral deleted from the contract with the remainder being credit for the wye and stub that was constructed. Total deductions for sewer laterals therefore is $2,250.00. 3.) Restaking: We reset construction stakes from station 25+00 to 28+60 at the request of the contractor. The original stakes were destroyed. Deduction for restaking is $100.00. 4.) Failed Compaction Tests: The total cost of failed compaction tests was $525.00. The specifications are clear that this cost shall be borne by the contractor. Vic Alfieri takes exception to this cost as noted in his letter. I have no other alternative but to accept my sub-contractors work. I have notified Pacific Geoscience of Vic's claim. CONTRACT EXTRAS 1 .) Tie-in At Manhole: I recommend a credit of $1 ,300.00 be made to the contractor for this work. The plans did not specifically note that the existing stub had to be removed. Secondly, the work performed by West Coast eliminated groundwater intrusion into the manhole which was significant prior to construction. 2. ) Clean-outs On Sewer Laterals: West Coast installed two clean-outs on each lateral installed across lot 83 to serve lots 69 and 70 at my direction in order to meet plumbing code requirements for private sewer laterals. Total cost claimed is $300.00. 3.) Trench Resurfacing: Due to the adjusted manhole location at station 21+30 an additional 310 feet of trench resurfacing was made. Also, since this design change occured during the course of construction resaw-cutting from station 21+30 to station 24+00 was done. Total additional claim for this work is $2,717.00. ! • CUESTA ENGINEERING 7401-B EI Camino Real/P.O. Box 2066 Atascadero, California 93423 (805)466-6827 TOTAL PROJECT COST I recommend that the following breakdown be used to determine the total project cost. Original contract amount $117,000.00 Contract deductions 1 . Liquidated damages $ 3,720.00 2. Sewer laterals 2,250.00 3. Restaking 100.00 4. Failed compaction tests 525.00 Total deductions $ 6,595.00 Adjusted contract amount after deductions $110,405.00 Contract extras 1 . Manhole tie-in $ 1 ,300.00 2. Sewer lateral clean-outs 300.00 3. Trench resurfacing 2,717.00 Total extras $ 4,317.00 Adjusted contract amount $114,722.00 The following items are attached in relation to the above breakdown of costs: 1 .) Change order forms which must be signed by the contractor. 2. ) Final payment request which should also be signed by the contractor. 3.) "Notice of Completion" which must be signed by you and should be forwarded to the County Recorder immediately. The 10% retention payment must be made to West Coast 35 days after recordation of the "Notice of Completion". If you should reach conclusions other than mine please contact me and I will revise the change order and final payment request forms. Sincerely, o � John Falkenstien R.C.E. 33760 CITY OF ATASCADERO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS C H A N G E O R D E R CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 DATE February 20, 1987 PROJECT NO. PROJECT TITLE:_ Marchant Way Sanitary Sewer Project The changes or interpretations described and noted herein are hereby authorized. The signed original of this order is on file at the office of the City Engineer. In preparing change orders show in order as separate numbered paragraphs: 1. Reason for change 2. Description of change. 3. Change in contract cost. 1 . Deletion of work from approved plans 2. Elimination of sewer laterals to lots 66, 67, 68, 71 , and 72 3. Deduct $450.00 for each lateral for a total deduction from this contrct of $2,250.00 (For additional space use reverse side) We, the undersigned contractor, have given careful consideration to the change proposed and hereby agree, if this proposal is approved, that we will provide all equipment, furnish all materials, except as may otherwise be noted above, and perform all services necessary for the work above specified, and will accept as full payment therefor the prices above. By reason of this proposed change, days extension of time will be allowed. Date Accepted: Date Approved: By Title City Engineer CITY OF ATASCADERO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS C H A N G E O R D E R CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 DATE February 20, 1987 PROJECT NO. PROJECT TITLE: Marchant Way Sanitary Sewer District The changes or interpretations described and noted herein are hereby authorized. The signed original of this order is on file at the office of the City Engineer. In preparing change orders show in order as separate numbered paragraphs: 1. Reason for change 2. Description of change. 3. Change in contract cost. 1 . Work performed beyond contract 2. (A) Construction of new tie-in at existing manhole in Pismo Ave. $1 ,300.00 (B) Clean-outs in sewer laterals to lots 69 and 70 4 clean-outs at $75.00/each total $300.00 (C) 310 feet of additional trench resurfacing at $8.00/LF. plus sawcutting at $237.00 total $2,717.00 3. Total Contract addition is $4,317.00 (For additional space use reverse side) We, the undersigned contractor, have given careful consideration to the change proposed and hereby agree, if this proposal is approved, that we will provide all equipment, furnish all materials, except as may otherwise be noted above, and perform all services necessary for the work above specified, and will accept as full payment therefor the prices above. By reason of this proposed change, days extension of time will be allowed. Date Accepted: Date Approved: By Title City Engineer CITY OF ATASCADERO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROGRESS PAYMENT NO. 4 Final DATE: 2/20/87 JOB:_ Marchant Way Sanitary Sewer Project JOB START DATE: 10/15/86 ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT $117,000.00 CONTRACT CHANGE ORDERS 1 p� <6 595.00> 2 4,317.00 ADJUSTED CONTRACT AMOUNT 114,722.00 TOTAL EARNED TO DATE 114,722.00 DEDUCT RETENTION (100/) 11 ,472.00 TOTAL LESS RETENTION 103,250.00 DEDUCT PREVIOUS PAYMENTS 96. 120.00 AMOUNT NOW DUE $ 7,130.00 TOTAL EXTRA WORK AUTHORIZED IS <$2,278.00> CONTINGENCY BUDGET PERCENT COMMITTED CONTRACT TIME 45 DAYS PERCENT OF TIME ELAPSED 250% ESTIMATED PERCENT OF CONTRACT COMPLETED TO DATE 100% APPROVED BY: ACCEPTED BY: CITY ENGINEER CONTRACTOR SPacE Ael"ll LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE NOTICE OF COMPLETION Notice pursuant to Civil Code-Section 3093, must be filed within 10 days after completion. (See reverse side for Complete requirements.) Notice is hereby given that: I. The undersigned is owner or corporate officer of the owner of the interest or estate stated below in the property hereinafter described: 1. The full name of the owner is City of Atascadero 3. The full address of the owner is 6500 Palma P.O. Box 747 Atascadero CA 93423 4. The nature of the interest or estate of the owner is; In fee. N/A (If other than fee,strike "In fee"and Insert,for example,"purchaser under contract of purchase,"or"lessee") 5. The full names and full addresses of all persons,if any,who hold title with the undersigned as joint tenants or as tenants in common are: NAMES ADDRESSES N/A 6. A work of improvement on the property hereinafter described was completed on 02/06/87 The work done was: Construction of sewer main and appurtances 7. The name of the contractor, if any, for such work of improvement was - West Coast Tank and Pipe (If no contractor for work of improvement as a whole, insert"none".) (Date of Contract) , 8. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the city of Atascadero Count of_San Luis Obi spo r y ,.State of California, and is described as follows: Marchant Way from Pismo Avenue to Santa Rosa Avenue as shown on Book 4 Maps at Page 56 in the Office of the County Recorder 9. The street address of said property is_ Marchant Way Dated: -2- 0 �7 (If no street address has been officially assigned,insert"none".) �°_ Verification fo Indiridwl,Owner Signature of owner or corporate officer of owner / named in paragraph 2 or his agent VERIFICATION I,the undersigned, say: I am the the declarant of the foregoing ("President of","Manager of", "A partnrr of", "Owner of",etc.) notice of completion; I have read said notice of completion and know the cuntents thereof; the same is true of my own knowledge. declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on ,19._.,at ,California. (Date of signature.) (City where signed.) (Pe(sonal signature of the individual who is swearing that the contents of the notice of completion are true.) NOTICE OF COMPLETION-WOLCOTT6 FORM 11 It-R[Y. 6.74 3 pt.type or larger West Coast 'dank & Npe P.O. Box 245 825 - 26th Street Contractors Paso Robles, CA 93447 LICENSE #392948 (805) 238-5523 February 13, 1987 Cuesta Engineering ' Post Office Box 2066 Atascadero, California 93423 ATTENTION: Mr. John Falkenstien REFERENCE: Marchant Way Sewer Improvement Dear John: Attached is a billing for extras that West Coast Tank & Pipe, hereinafter referred to as WCT&P, has encountered on the abovementioned job. In regards to Manhole #1, on the pre-bid job walk there was found to be an existing stub. We bid the job to tie into same. After opening the trench to a depth of 20+ feet, we found the stub at a 45° angle from the new trench line, along with water seepage into the existing manhole, creating a problem with tying into said manhole. At that time, you were notified and an agreement was made to install a new stub and repair the existing manhole. WCT&P bid this particular job twice and was low bidder both times. After negotiations with the City of Atascadero and examination of the soil boring logs and test holes dug by the City and ourselves, there was no indication of any unforeseem problems and we proceeded with construction with a negotiated price of $117,000. Easements and locations of cleanouts were still to be later negotiated. Construction proceeded until rock was encountered, drastically slowing progress. Use of jack-hammers, special equipment, and an excavator were required to continue with the project. At that time, WCT&P notified you and Paul Sensibaugh, City of Atascadero Cuesta Engineering February 13, 1987 Page Two engineer, and it was then decided that construction would continue and compensation to the Contractor for lost time would be paid at the end of the job because the extent of the problem was unknown. In regards to problems arising from encountering the gas main, enclosed please find a letter explaining same. Problems also arose when it came to compaction tests. On five different occasions questionable results were obtained from the machine and the operator believed the results were in error. At that time, WCT&P should have filed a claim with Pacific Geoscience and brought in another testing agency, however, completion of the job was of foremost importance and recompaction procedures were undertaken. As a result, WCT&P's postion is that they should not incurr any additional charges resulting from re-testing of said soil. We are requesting consideration for waiver of penalty fees brought on by extra efforts arising from re-compaction procedures. Very tr y yours, �v Victor Alfieri Superintendent LOST TIME ON ROCK & REPAIR OF MANHOLE: NO. 1 Repair leaking manhole new stub manhole. $ 1,300.00 Lost time 11 days for rock at $3,853.16 pr. da. 42,684.76 $ 43,684.76 Installed on lost days 255 L.F. 8" sewer @ $38.71 pr. ft. Credit city (9,871.05) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Extras to West Coast Tank & Pipe $33,813.71 — 130 Paving Extra 32/.513.T/ Installed main line 1372 L.F. @ $8.00 pr. ft. On Contract installed 1170 L.F. (9,360.00) Extra 310 L.F. 2,480.00 Extra saw cut 236.79 $2,716.79 Total $36,530.50 Sewer Laterals: West Coast Tank & Piping installed 22 ea. laterals on contract ( $13,200.00) 2 laterals installed easements 5 not complete no easements Credit city 1/2 cost 5 ea. $300.00 ( 1,500.00) West Coast Tank Piping installed 4 ea. clean outs (Extra) 75.00 ea. 300.00 $35,330.50 2 DAYS RAIN CREDIT WCT&P 6 DAYS HOLIDAYS if it OVER AND ABOVE CONTRACT: MANHOLE $1,300.00 ROCK 42,384.76 EXTRA PAVING 2,480.00 EXTRA CLEAN OUTS 300:00 SAW CUT 236.70 $46,701.55 Credit City Sewer (9,871.05) Laterals easements (1,500.00) Total extra $35,330.50 CUESTA ENGINEERING 7401-B EI Camino Real/ P.O. Box 2066 Atascadero, California 93423 (805)466-6827 January 6, 1987 Paul Sensibaugh City of Atascadero 6500 Palma Atascadero, CA 93422 SU3JECT: Marchant Way Sanitary Sewer - Progress Report Paul, During the month of December, Vic Alfieri's crews completed laying the last 880 feet of sewer main. They also completed all of the sewer lateral work per my instructions. Most of the long sewer laterals to homes on Santa Rosa had to be deleted from Vic's contract because we have not obtained easements (Roy Hill) or other arrangments are being made that don't involve Vic. Also, during December Vic has begun serious compacting efforts. As of this writing, I expect that Vic will use an additional 30 calendar days to complete tae project. He still has to complete all testing and street paving. I also expect that Vic will present his claims to you soon for time lost due to encountering rock. Attached is the progress payment request for Vic for December. Note at the present time that we are not accounting for any contract amount adjustments. Sincerely, John Falkenstien R.C.E. 33760 86-070 t e � CUESTA ENGINEERING 7401-B EI Camino Real/P.O. Box 2066 Atascadero, California 93423 (805)466-6827 November 26, 1986 Paul Sensibaugh Public Works Director City of Atascadero 6500 Palma Atascadero, CA 93422 Subject: Marchant Way Sewer Assessmemt District construction contract Dear Paul: Attached is a letter from Vic Alfieri requesting additional time to complete the project and additional money due to various problems he describes. With regards to the time extension, I recommend that the contract time be extended 30 days to December 31. In my opinion, this extension is warranted due to the severe rock conditions encountered from Station 17+50 to Station 19+50. The rock in this area has been encountered at a depth of five feet. The cut to flow line of sewer in this area is approximately eight feet. Hard rock was also encountered at various locations between the first two manholes. At each of these locations, the rock had to be removed by jack-hammering and related hand work. Pipe laying has been progressing at -a rate of 20 feet a day beginning November 19. Under ordinary conditions, work would progress at a rate of 200 feet or more per day. In my opinion, the contractor is working in a diligent manner and consideration of this time extension is warranted. With respect to the request for extra payment, the contract specifications do not include a "Rock Clause" or provision for extra pa tent due to difficult material encountered in the trenching. This project was bid three times at prices greater than $140,000. Contractors at that time expressed concerns about ground water and trench caving. The boring logs were included in the last bid advertisement to alleviate these fears. Three borings over an 1800 foot long project may provide an indication of expected ground water levels but in no way can be considered to be a.representation of existence or non-existence of rock in the trench zone. I would suggest that the fact that [Jest Coast negotiated in good faith with the City at a price of $117,00, thereby gambling that ground water and caving would not be a serious problem, may entitle them to consideration for money lost due to encountering rock. This decision should rest upon the City Council. Consideration of a cost amount should take place after all work is completed and a true cost is presented by West Coast. I think Mr. Paul Sensibaugh November 26, 1986 Page 2 you would agree with me that $7,000 per day of rock encounter or $350 per foot of pipe in rock as is suggested in the letter (180 ft. x $38.71 per ft.) is not appropriate: I disagree with the assertion that the plans were misleading regarding the stub in manhole number one. In fact the plans did not show a stub. With regards to the gas line conflict, the plans were prepared from gas company records and were signed by a representative of their company. Paragraph E, Section 1, of Special Provisions of the Contract Specifications addresses utility conflicts and states that the contractor "shall have no claim for damages of extra compensation in the event his work is held up by other forces." Vic may have a claim with the Gas Company if he feels that the marks in the field were not accurate. In conclusion, I recommend that a 30 day time extension be granted to West Coast immediately. Secondly, I recommend that any consideration for extra costs for encountering rock be made at the conclusion of the project. Consideration for the work in the tie-in manhole can also be discussed after the project is completed. I also recomend that no consideration for extra payment be made with regards to the gas line conflict. All considerations for extra costs should be base&tipon documents submitted by the contractor explicitly outlining his extra payment requests. Sincerely, John Falkenstien R.C.E. 33760 Exp. 6/30/90 /emp Attachment West Coast Tank & Pipe P.O. Box 245 Contractors 825 - 26th Street Paso Robles, CA 93447 LICENSE #392948 1805) 238-5523 November 24, 1986 - Cuesta Engineering 7401 E1 Camino Real Post Office Box 2066 Atascadero, California 93423 _ ATTENTION: Mr. John Falkenstien REFERENCE: Marchant Way Gentlemen: As you know, we-have encountered problems on the sewer project on Marchant Way. When the job was bid, we were supplied with boring and soils reports. As you know, we were quite worried with the problem of encountering water at the 20' depth and at various locations along the construction path. The borings we were supplied with did not give any indication of encountering rock and -as—can be verified with your inspector, Rob, we have encountered extremely hard blue granite rock of up to 100' in length. Our original intentions were to dig this project with a rubber tired back hoe, but because of the hard digging, we were forced to bring in a track layer excavator. After encountering this hard rock, we were forced to use rippers on our excavator and even with these installed, we have been forced to jackhammer a great deal of this rock. This project was bid to dig, prepare, lay and cover approximately 200' per day and because of this unexpected rock situation, there have been several days -when we were only able to complete 20' . We feel this was not due to our making or lack of planning and is a complete change of conditions of what the soil borings and plans indicated. In addition to the above, we have dealt with the water that we encountered by importing pea gravel and sand backfill to ensure proper bedding for piping and street structures. Cuesta Engineering November 24, 1986 Page Two We have lost both time and money due to these unforeseen problems and we feel that an increase in both is justified. We are now requesting a 30 working day extension of time, a change order involving the compensation for the removal of rock.,, and installation of a new stub out on manhole #1 due to -the fact that this stub out was going in the wrong direction and not per plans. In addition to the above, the plans showed a gas line that would cross our path of construction that was bid accordingly but in fact the gas pipeline ran parallel in our ditch for a distance of approximately 20' to 30' and caused us further delays that we are requesting additional time and compensation. We believe that these change orders are in order but we can not put a dollar amount on the rock at this time because we are still not completed with that portion of the excavation and we feel that this would be submitted when we are in fact complete. We only request that you be made aware of this and are in agreement that there are changes in order. During normal working conditions, we would expect to get 200' per day at $38.71/foot, when in fact we have had several days that we have only completed 20' This will give you some idea of the type of change order we are looking at. We feel that the above request is reasonable and necessary. As you know, we lowered our price considerably with the assurance from the City of Atascadero that we would be compensated for any unforeseen difficulties. 4Veryty yours, Victor AM4'i Superintendent MEMORANDUM TO: BOARD OF DIRECTORS-ATASCADERO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT THROUGH: MICHAEL SHELTON, CITY MANAGER FROM: PAUL M. SENSIBAUGH, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER SUBJECT : INTERPRETATION OF RESOLUTION 20-84 AND APPEAL OF SANITATION FEES - CASA CAMINO APARTMENTS/DON MESSER RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board support the payment of sewer annexation fees and sewer charges now in effect . BACKGROUND: July 1 , 1986 was the effective date of the sewer ordinance update with respect to fees . The above project has proceded with two phases of 48 units and 52 units . The initial 48 units was applied for under the old fee structure, but the 52 units filed for a permit after July 1 , 1986 . Staff is charging fees for this second phase based on current fees . The developer has cited Resolution 20-84 (attached) which reads in part " . . .payment of all connection and extension fees . . . ' . Staff has interpreted this to mean the fees and charges in effect at the time of connection . Mr . Messer and his attorney (letter attached) disagree with this position and are asking for relief under sanitation code section 12 . 3 (copy attached) . DISCUSSION: Due to treatment plant problems prior to the opening of the new plant , the District included in the annexation resolutions of the south side of town language that would add $70 per unit to apartments constructed in this area . There is no mention of the dollar figure when the annexation fees are discussed. The revised fee schedule eliminated the special $70 per unit and incorporated that fee into the new charges . Certain provisions regarding on-site lift stations are conditioned during the map filing process . Mr . Lewis' letter (attorney) claims that Precise 11-84 for this project is protected by Map Act section 66498 . 1 which addresses vested rights . Section 66452 (c) states that the map so considered shall • include the words "Vesting Tenative Map . " Section 66498 . 1 (e) , a 1986 ammendment says that the local agency may impose reasonable conditions on subsequent required approvals or permits necessary for development . In October of 1986 Mr . Messer filed Tract Map 1389 which supercedes the previous Precise Plan 11-84 . As a Condition of Approval of the Tract Map the Applicant was conditioned to "pay all appropriate fees in force at the time of recordation of the final map or construction of additional units . " A copy of the Tract Map and Condition of Approval #3 are attached. Staff' s position is that the resolution gave the right to annex based upon fees in effect at the time of application for sewer service . FISCAL IMPACT : The old fee was $725 per unit plus $70 per unit , or $795 per unit times 52 , or a total of $41 , 340 . The new fees and charges are $1123 for annexation plus $533 per unit for the connection fee, or $1656 per unit , or a total of $86, 112 . The loss to the sewer facilities sinking fund for capital improvements if the old fee is allowed would be $44 ,772 . It is pointed out here that this and other developments anticipated after July 1 , 1986 were used in the calculation of the current fees and that future improvements and expansions will rely on the collection of those fees . It should be stated that the unit costs quoted above are apartment units . If these units are converted to condominiums there is an additional $123. 00 per unit . GLEN R. LEWIS A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION 5275 EL CAMINO REAL POST OFFICE BOX 1980 ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA 93423 TELEPHONE (805) 466-6644 April 21, 1987 Paul Sensibaugh Public Works Director City of Atascadero City Administration Building Atascadero, CA 93422 RE: CASA CAMINO APARTMENTS/DONALD MESSER Dear Mr. Sensibaugh: This law office has been contacted by Mr. Donald Messer with reference to the proposed fees to be charged for the erection of Phase III of the 140-Unit Casa Camino Apartment Project. In reviewing the documentation supplied to me, more particularly the precise Plan 11-84 Approval and Resolution Number 20-84, it is clear that this particular project comes under the vested right theory under Government Code Section 66498.1. In reviewing Resolution Number 20-84, Subpart 1 (a) through (c) , it is clear that the only additional fees to be charged the project developer would be $70. 00 per residential unit as stated in item 1(b) . No other fees are recited in the Resolution Number 20-84. With reference to the precise Plan 11-84, the conditions stated in that precise plan will be met by my clients. Except for the additional fees of $70. 00 per residential unit and the other conditions in the original precise Plan 11-84 presented to the developer as of July 9, 1984, Government Code Section 66498. 1 prevents the City of Atascadero or any subagency of the City from imposing any additional fees. Please have this letter presented to the City Council and City Attorney with reference to an application being presently processed on behalf of Don Messer Construction. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, GRL:rg GLEN/R. LEWIS D& MESSER CONSTRU*ION CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE NO. 294114 7450 MORRO ROAD P. O. BOX 1958 ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA 93423 PHONE (805) 466-0549 April 14, 1987 Paul Sensibaugh Public Works Director Atascadero, CA 93422 RE: Casa Camino Fees Dear Paul, I have reviewed the precise plan approval and resolution I 20-84, the Sewer.District extension agreement for the entire 140 unit Casa Camino project in order to understand how the city can increase our sewer fees. It appears clear to me that we have an approved project (all 140 units) and have agreed in advance to what the fees will be. Item # 1B of re- solution 20-84 is very specific as to the amount $70.00 and for future cost of upgrading the local sewer collection system. Condition lA clearly refers to the existing fees and has no reference to future fees since the next item 1B addresses future cost of improvements. Our group has invested a considerable amount of time and money into im- provements related to the development of Phase III: 1. Sewer lift pump and collection system 2. Access roads 3 Frontage road improvements 4. Swimming pool 5. Parking 6. Engineering 7. P G & E Service All of these improvements and expenses were sized in order to accomodate Phase III (52 units) . Had we not had an agreement that assured our ability both physically and economically to build Phase III we would not have in- curred as much expense. We feel we have a vested interest in this project and that the prior approval has properly addressed the future fees with item 1B. INDUSTRIAL RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE I Condition 1C also addresses future systems by requiring us to design our system to minimize pumping during peak-flows. I thought we had met your requirements for Phase III, but now I understand we may have to install holding tanks for Phase III. We will co-operate with the city in this regard, but the additional sewer fees were not planned for and could destroy the project after all our efforts and expenses. I have asked Glen Lewis attorney to better explain our position for the benefit of the city attorney. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, Dcn Messer 40 *5 1-.SPA RESOLUTION NO. 20-84 A RESOLUTION OF THE ATASCADERO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT APPROVING EXTENSION OF SEWER SERVICE OUTSIDE THE BOUNDARIES OF IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 AND ESTABLISHING CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL OF SAID EXTENSION FOR APN #45-320-01 WHEREAS, Allen Grimes, .Tom McNamara, Bill McNamara, Stan Cherry, Gayle Sharp and Dennis Bethel own the property described in Exhibits A and B, as attached to this Resolution, and; WHEREAS, the property owner wishes to connect to an existing sewer main in El Camino Real, fronting said property, and; WHEREAS, the property described in Exhibits A and B is not within the limits of Improvement District No. 1, and; WHEREAS, an engineered study of the effect of adding this property to the sewer system has been submitted, reviewed and approved by the Public Works Director, and; WHEREAS, said study indicates the future necessity of improvements to the local sewer collection system, with the cost of these improvements pro- rated equally to new connections outside Improvement District No. 1, and; WHEREAS, it is in the interest of the Sanitation District to provide sewer service to residential development in this area of the City. Now, Therefore, Be it Resolved by the Board of Directors of the Atascadero County Sanitation District, as follows: 1 - That the property owned by Allen Grimes, Tom McNamara, Bill McNamara, Stan Cherry, Gayle Sharp and Dennis Bethel, as described in Exhibits A and B is approved for extension of sewer service subject to the following conditions: a - Payment of all connection and extension fees as provided in the Atascadero County Sanitation District Ordinance Code. b - Payment of an additional $70.00 per residential unit, such payment to be in consideration of the future cost of upgrading the local sewer collection system. c - Any on-site sewer lift or pump station must be designed and constructed to eliminate pumping into the collection system during periods of peak sewer flows. The system must be designed by a Civil Engineer registered in the State of California, and approved by the City Engineer. Said on-site pump station shall have pro- visions for monitoring, by District employees to determine pumping time utilized. d - Obtaining all necessary plumbing and street encroachment permits. On motion by Director Molina and seconded by Director Wilkins the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following vote: AYES: Director Wilkins, Molina, Nelson, Stover and Mackey NOES: None ADOPTED: April 23 , 1984 ATTEST: �R 7PROVED YL. ARDEN, SecretaryMARJORI R. MACKEY,,Chairman AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FOR: UR Y L. ARDEN, City Manager ALLEN GRIMES, City Attorney e 'j co 1-7 r X W J �✓l 51 - - --- _- ---- - LLl cr- � U I W J I j w 9 Exhibit B Legal Description Lot 9 in Block 7 of Eaglet No. 22 according to the Map of Mitchell's Re-subdivision of Rancho Atascadero, as per map recorded January 1, 1920, in Book 2, Page 39 of Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of San Luis Obispo County. ..1 amm !i T I' 41 yi`, �" ®DO, M1�r wr e k ktV ID I ; I TOT l Itr; Mg I.- alp e s . I I ; d,T IISI Ow i: I ©O oO i p p jl © �1/ �i I 1 E /-1 IF)IT LZ T�11WC� M it P L/C 71Z ACJ- lu ill' b- 25 to ger 10705 EZ CAt X11 VD 1ZLM JU2NW 1`.r�t CGtSII- Cf�N IHJD `�� LVAI ':73 -- j--- - O)1117 nF--2!;riN"Vmn4 i'iu TNr 0 0 Tentative Tract Map 6-86 (Casa Camino/Dennis Bethel) EXHIBIT D - Tentative Tract Map 6-86 Findings for Approval October 6, 1986 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The applicant shall establish Covenants, Conditions, and Restric- tions (CC&Rs) for the regulation of land use, control of nuisances and architectural constrol for all buildings. a. These CC&Rs shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Attorney and Community Development Department prior to approval of the final map. b. These CC&Rs shall be administered by a Condominium Homeowners Association. 2. Submit a soils report or engineer ' s certification that existing soils on the site are adequate to support proposed structures per Chapter 70, subsection (e) of the Uniform Building Code. 3 The applicant shall pay all appropriate fees in force at the time of recordation of the final map or construction of additional units. This shall include the difference between the fees for apartments and single family residences. 4. All requirements of state law (Subdivision Map Act) concerning the conversion of occupied residential units to air-space condominiums shall be complied with. 5. All conditions of approval herein specified are to be complied with prior to the filing of the final map. 6. A final map, in compliance with all conditions set forth herein, shall be submitted for review and approval in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City Lot Division Ordinance prior to recordation. a. Monuments shall be set at all new property corners created and a registered civil engineer or licensed land surveyor shall indicate, by certificate on the final map, that corners have been set or shall be set by a date specific and that they will be sufficient to enable the survey. to be retraced. b. A recently updated preliminary title report shall be submit- ted for review in conjunction with the processing of the final map. 7. Approval of this tentative tract map shall expire two years from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted pursuant to a written request prior to the expiration date. 4 _. i� Consolidated Ord.* 12. 3 Relief: Any person, who by reason of special circumstances believes that the application of any of the provisions of this Ordinance Code to him is unjust or inequitable, may make written application to the Board of Directors for relief therefrom. Said application shall set forth all of the special facts and circumstances and shall request the specific relief or modification desired. The Board of Directors upon receipt of such application and after such investigation as deemed necessary may take action to grant such relief or modification as it finds necessary. The Board of Directors, on its own motion and without application, may, when special circumstances make the application of any of the provisions of this Ordinance Code unjust or inequitable, modify or suspend the rules and regulations for the period during which the special circumstances exist c a* S w c o+ 3 0 w o+ .. a' T a l ? 0 w N O O+ �•� n-p � j iv w N + n fD W (D N v p n (cj A O O w A S Q A a n. N� A; d Q0 A ° O 5.0 °i N c n S SS3 Y� ^ n"a ° � p =*. D 3 ID n - w � O ^ w O 3o-nrD rD (D n S_ . < S. � � 30 a'3 on) rnIDaE;0- 0 r O � 3 D ^ T = w'O•p �` 0 -fin c n to --a lD (D w Q-M m � j w <.(D _ � A+ w � to A (D M (D - < (D m M 7 w n 7 0 a (D c c =T 7 OrQ r T r+ O < (D ,O•' O S O �- (D ° y y'n �' O n S -w w e H !D = n'=0 fD < w fD O (D 7 (D o--0 n ® Q a 3 O c w w �, lb W a' "' _�"' Q. e rD w N n rD Q.' �� w_rD Q��O O �Os "Q ro O - j- '0 n Cr O'o O ° i;,•-_°° �'.-c d X n'�,w °'(n w `^•w c rAD 0.0 -0 °' .w•' tflD 0-� 0- .-.<rD M (<D rD O � O < w °-' <'a O (D O (D Q-'a ' w a <' D O 0 Oy n < o "' .+ O Q o n < 3 c a o N ? N. 3 v !".< n ' � c =Q.- 0 --°O Q< �� 3 n c r�D Zr� o D-*� o o D ° .n w 0 a j 3 w w p �-�. w (D O S m rD 0 (D ° � cD w 0 0_ ° =rD m rD ro +'n (DrDa < ti o`< O „ ? y (D n w o n.N W. w =(OD C 6 0 n 0. a 3 a w rNp .. a oD= 0 O ? a a v_O ° < w m ° o ?T 3'0 o_a r)aa r�D o �'o 0 '< rD c a== .Oso ^ ID 0 a (D 0 m 3 o m m _�� n r 0 °-K 0� O 0 M"� w� a SO ° 0 a�3 T 0 6�, O n � n >^TQ � � � w � � 3 T(Dn � %+ -a-w 3r�o = � v, orpO ?: a � � acfDO � � w Q� w� A 4wrD°° Cu z �,n w° w ' =rD S� �'(DD 0- M !? 0 0 0-p ao N S� rD c w On p O o O ,+ a s 0 j rn (D w ac a a-Pi� �° 3 m w O o =�' rD a 3 Ta QrD rD ao M Z.C) CL rD (D w � K =-3 S„' w d�•c f3D =(D < y= N w rD -Q a ] 0 3 (D d z rD ,< S ru n 3o mo a'sy� r°pnwT " a(D .+ n�3 ^' °+ w mo0. an r�Dj 0 c ^.o- o. 400 Q(=D j y w ^ �,(D 3 y 7 * rD o�q2 0.A T N M,A `^ X-° 00•B 'D O_p+ �N rD °i aA, a-°•O_rO n �� o °= m n y °' T3 ¢ _S< �� O eD T+ o rD Y rD o K w +D .. �^ o W -- w w -� A C A (D n 0 ? 3 N c �_ 0-0 0 K M q °' c, '. � w A Q; O 3'cmrb M- T ID nn Sm rD'� N A SrD •� mO O. N<n A `^ _'� m3 w- 0 °ap (nD N' ° 0 0 O p+ d=o `^ "" y S 6'(D c N m'w C fD �' N n (D Gr = w w rD O. a� ro a ?0 3 3 c� c w � � aCD a= a- -0 o » D w 0- �� ° fD < n � ° as o ,..' (D T n y O y (mD� m -(<D w w 00 nrD m 'a0 0-fMD 14 ad(D M -< '^.0 o n (D o S3 3 ° 3 n r: �'0 ^ 0 ° v TO O Q� r+ > > O m w s.� �. O ° H O O rp (D a' �•w 'o > v, a"w n S _.�+ (D 3 a"S n ' (D. --a'a c p - r:S CM n, �- 0 a•a a c O_ MID M A c �n n 0-rD - rD n O c c 0-< (D O y rD(D y rD O O a p, -•' m .. O S ^ N c w 3 7c Q n (D n ate ? =-N °K N -, �W 0 O ?w Q in �• n °; r.:p, N•< ° 0-a �+eD n C C w a'�,(D (D w (D O tL O �m 0 n w A+ w 3 ,-. w y d _ _'< v, 0- n m 3� j 3 c _ R .. (D S 7 S (D S c n (D (D rD 7 O_ H a N o (D d S .O-•'�'-G. o m -r° 7 7-',w0 o m 3'rD O'Q as a w 0 0 N N _ o � o � 3 > > 33 °c r? ° Mammo CD =- "cm � a 3 � ON 3 (nD � a - -_ : w (D �_ lD - O (D w _ M rD 7 w E;-°'T cr°- (D (? 7 3 C,< s.W Q• 7=c' '^0:3 N O w vAi H' A ^ w -A - ^ a3- Naw 3� o3ro m " n 3 ° n � " an - ^ row S? � 3 � w N•�. W y Q c rD w w w W _._{ rn a w S c c C w w - 0 7 (D (D www w O. < c= (D (D n n = a Q D o n v S 7 Q n S n �. O O a N y n (� w Q c CD o wn 0 0 SN.= :� w X S-a (D 3rD m3 N 2DD a w 3 �� <'� M a > > m =.SL 3 a (D -,a-O- -° ^. - w CS ; ° K a"a-0 w TS�"7 ate° N w (D S t "(D LD. � � < cao < a. = a rD (D (D McmfDO wrDn � m ora `^ A (D-0 03.nw - ow :30 �0 tv Q TO�o�ro vat (D y' <='R3 � vA, ° w � �.� ST dcrD 3 ao °a (moo a (D w m so as s� a w ^ 0 w n m-0 ^ ro o (D ° �.0 c- a° (D �e ° ate, ° 0 0 0°° 3 T.°c ° a-(D M 0 o �•� o� o v m D a T o ?�w n =3CD _ `�° O 3 m� 3 cr a� fD ntw rD a w a rD 3 n T a0 w -•c O n•�o y 3 A_ p n Sin O O N „ (D (D 0 - O 0 <� O < � S° w ��� 7 rD'O� ° „ rD an-0 a N ° so <.� ma -am w °=. � 3 �s� � w g° o na as(Da reo a d W o `�° o mea ?; sa nw =-o s- 0 3 � oa-m 00oa s = W `° :S- oo °oaa = aA as d co.(o V o w n o = ,S- a� a O Q j - sm - D m c a O 0 (D �°i w w n - c a Q H-a �• ? S 0 (D (D w rD �ci, o'n' --� w. ,r. Q Q O,a. rD 3 > S n d <�. 7 S. � N c d Q Q.3 z W w °- O c- N O (D - Q•-••3 w 0 -° C 0 3 '' !DD O >> d D_ a _. - _ n O w x n ,�, A - "a tD O� Q rD D 7 ] rD S w w N X rD - O a w p �++ (D n w n Q� n to to S Q, w .-r Q� < N �, 7c- 7'(D �< � 7 n rD O w w d. 7 n - (D rD (D A �. A 7 ClO� c _ ^00 (D �n N N °' � w O_ �. � (D�o=o "a n c 2-S N � 0 � � v+-v, --< O � � �rD O p = O (D rD w - v N (D oa - _S c n O O w v n < O a, m 0_-oww � rDO ID 3w w � 3 -� < � rDa � a-. . n O S '. OW n n o w rD 7 ^. w O w w 0 (D (D � O w a n 0 � z' w o w c °' � C (p w � Ez. (3 .a w s 3 � 0 0 oa� Tn OSS _ 3 < d� n 0 Sw m m - W vn x- a0 3 S= m 0 0 (D Q°=� Q A m O "o rD O O 3 c o o w 3 3 a a�� a ° D o� -u o- a S A fD M w ° iD n rD n' a 3 m Eu W- rD a w � SSO�3 w 0� o a -0 oo ^ (D -3a�o f 3 0 w_ m 3 (Das a ro iD 0 < a n (D 3 0 w n S aQ rD a _'0 Q ((D (D D (D �0 °: �^ T O w 00 <- 0 ?T d 0 0-- Z,;. 0_ o _» w_ c p"nO O m n 0 (D (n O w m <. � O a=o �° (Fc0'a� 0 (� � 3 :30 (D w o� w r� xn 3 (0 3a z wwa 0-U, 3z) -3 - w nS 3n a > > a O rD O_ a T n n O �' (D O-0 d 0-p' (D 9 -0 m= O w d O rD w n n (D D QO w rD < D N d OO 'T O ° _ Tooo:3 w d a oao ao ADMINISTRATION BUILDING • •�1 CITY ATTORNEY POST OFFICE BOX 747 •. POST OFFICE BOX 749 �TASCADERO, CALIFORNIA 93423 - ATASCADERO,CALIFORNIA 93423 PHONE: (805) 466.8000 PHONE: (805) 466-5678 CITY COUNCIL ""�" CITY CLERK � - Nllllm��� Ag deiCeCITY TREASURER POLICE DEPARTMENT .kPOST OFFICE BOX 747 CITY MANAGER NCORPORATED JATASCADERO,CALIFORNIA 93423 FINANCE DEPARTMENT PHONE: (805) 466.8600 PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT - PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT RECREATION DEPARTMENT 6005 LEWIS AVENUE ATASCADERO,CALIFORNIA 93422 «-�- - PHONE: (805) 466-2141 June 25, 1984 - Dennis Bethel and Associates 313 B East Plaza Drive - Suite 9 Santa Maria, CA 93454 RE: PRECISE PLAN 11-84 (10705 El Camino Real) 140 unit multiple family residential project (Lot 9, Block 7, Eaglet #2) Dear Mr. Bethel: The City of Atascadero has received and reviewed your application for a Precise Plan and Environmental Determination for approval of devel- opment of a 140 unit multiple family residential project at the above referenced location. The proposed site is zoned RMF/16 (Residential Multiple, Family, 16 units per acre) and the proposed use would be allowable ra defined as Multiple Family Dwellings (Section 9-3. 172 (f) ) . The surrounding properties are all zoned RMF/16 and are partially dev- eloped with residential uses, with the exception of the property to the north and east that is in the County and contains the State Hospital. The proposed project is in compliance with the provisions of the Zon- ing Ordinance with the exception of: Section 9-4.115 (c) - Requiring the provision of five handicapped stalls Section 9-4.104 (b) - Requiring a front yard setback of 25 ' -0" for 6 ' -0" fences Section 9-4 . 129 (b) (1) - Requiring trash enclosures to be within 100 feet of each building A review by the Planning Director of the Environmental Description form and application along with other background information shows that the project will have no detrimental effect upon the environment, therefore, a Negative Declaration has been prepared. The Director has also found the project to be in compliance with the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance with the exception of those sections stated a4Q� JOB # —== '4 The proposed Precise Plan is approved as shown on attached Exhibit A (site plan) , Exhibit B (elevation) , and subject to the conditions of approval listed in Exhibit C. Final approval of the Precise Plan will become effective at 5:00 p.m. on July 9, 1984 , unless appealed. In the event you intend to appeal any of the conditions, your appeal should be in writing and should state the reasons for the appeal. Any appeal would be scheduled for Planning Commission consideration as a public hearing. You should, however, discuss any objections to the conditions with the Planning Staff as it may be possible to alter con- ditions after such discussion. If you should have any questions concerning this project, you are wel- come to contact this office for assistance. Sincerely, Joel Moses Associate Planner JM:ps Enclosures 2 m 1 ; W/ T) ,Zf& j 1 Y N + r 1' x + > 7 o - Lim?U , y � n H 3 > a°D _ r cn a0 D �+ ° "> 01 t �i o cn ,--� u t M 01 a jF: z i �► �TM1 • 1 1 _ � y c ,I a � - m I^ D a r z I. 1# IL 1 a H �Q n �1 >. D ' z ^O J ` 0 1 2 cn z ► . u 11 " f o Ill �lil o cn .� - in M• A� y •1 p a I m ADMINISTRATION BUILDING CITY ATTORNEY FICE BOX 747 �,'" POST OFFICE BOX 749 -RTAS -.J�RO, CALIFORNIA 93423 - ATASCADERO.CALIFORNIA 93423 ATA S;PHONE: (805) 466-8000 - PHONE: (805) 466-5678 CITY COUNCIL ~� CITY CLERK POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY TREASURER POST OFFICE BOX 747ffn ? Ile CITY MANAGER INCORPORATED JULY 2. 1979 ATASCADERO,CALIFORNIA 9347' FINANCE DEPARTMENT PHONE: (805) 466-8600 PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT ...�� PLANNING DEPARTMENT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT - FIRE DEPARTMENT RECREATION DEPARTMENT, 6005 LEWIS AVENUE ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA 93422 �. PHONE: (805) 466-2141 July 26, 1984 Dennis Bethel and Associates 313 B East Plaza Drive - Suite 9 Santa Maria, CA 93454 - SUBJECT: PRECISE PLAN 11-84 10705 El Camino Real Dear Mr. Bethel: This is to advise that approval of the above-referenced applica- tion concerning your request to approve a 140 unit multiple fam- ily residential project became effective at 5 :00 p.m. on July 9, 1984. No appeals were received during the appeal period which ended on that same date. Enclosed please find a Final Notice of Approval for the project. If you should have any questions or concerns regarding this matter , please feel free to contact the Planning Department. Sincerely, ik "_-I�_'�� Joel Moses Associate Planner JM:ps cc: Casa Camino Properties S1,r � FILE c. I �.. 103 ;~? NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF PRECISE PLAN SUBJECT: PRECISE PLAN 11-84 LOCATION: 10705 El Camino Real (Lot 9 , Block 7) APPLICANT: Dennis Bethel and Associates REQUEST: To approve development of a 140 unit multiple family resi- dential project. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Precise Plan 11-84 has been approved by the Planning Director. Copies of the Staff Report, plans, and re- lated project information are available for public review and comment in the Planning Department (Room 103) , Administration Building, 6500 Palma Avenue, Atascadero, California. The Planning Director has prepared a Negative Declaration indica- ting the project will not have a significant adverse effect upon the environment. This is to advise that approval of Precise Plan 11-84 became ef- fective at 5:00 p.m. on July 9 , 1984. Dated: July 26 , 1984 WAYNE LOFT S, Pla ing irector City of Atascadero, California cc: City Council City Manager City Attorney Planning Commission MJ O'Brien CM Colombo Victor Mori Jr. Holiday Paper Products Inc. BH Baker G Wood c/o JK Nelson I ADMINISTRATION BUILDING - CITY ATTORNEY POST OFFICE BOX POST OFFICE BOX 606 PHONE: ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIAIA 93423 ATASCADERO.CALIFORNIA 93423 PHONE: (805) 466.8000 PHONE: (805) 466-4422 CITY COUNCIL A � ® CITY CLERK - POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY TREASURER INCORPORATED JULY 2. 1979 POST OFFICE BOX 747 CITY MANAGER - ATASCADERO. CALIFORNIA 934h3 PHONE: (805) 466-8600 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT 6005 LEWIS AVENUE ATASCADERO. CALIFORNIA 93422 PHONE: (805) 466-2141 June 23 , 1986 Dennis Bethel and Associates 313 B East Plaza Drive' - Suite 9 Santa Maria, CA 93454 RE: Time Extension: Precise Plan 11-84 (10705 El Camino Real - Casa Camino Apartments) Dear Mr. Bethel : I have reviewed your request for a time extension for the above-referenced precise plan. The approval would normally expire on July 9 , 1986 . Pursuant to Section 9-2 . 118 of the Zoning Ordinance, the approvals have been extended to July 9, 1987 . Normally, a second time extension would require Planning Commission approval . In that the previously granted time extension was unnecessary, this extension will be con- sidered the first one . If you should have any questions concerning this matter, please contact the Community Development Department for assistance. Sincerely, Doug Da idson Assistant Planner DD •p s Rc::,i i t I - -- - F1 L 1 -- i X12 1 I�� JOB# By A � NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF PRECISE PLAN SUBJECT: PRECISE PLAN 11-84 LOCATION: 10705 E1 Camino Real (Lot 9, Block 7) APPLICANT: Dennis Bethel and Associates REQUEST: To approve development of a 140 unit multiple family resi- dential project. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Precise Plan 11-84 has been approved by the Planning Director . Copies of the Staff Report, plans and rela- ted project information are available for public review and comment in the Planning Department (Room 103) , Administration Building, 6500 Pal- ma Avenue, Atascadero, California. The Planning Director has prepared a draft Negative Declaration indicating the project will not have a significant adverse effect upon the environment. The final date for appeal is fourteen (14) days after the decision of the Planning Director , or until 5:00 p.m. on July 9 , 1984. Anyone wishing further information on this proposed project may do so by appearing in'-person at the Planning Department or by phoning 466-8000. Unless appealed, the approval of Precise Plan 11-84 will become effective at 5:00 p.m. on July 9 , 1984. Dated: June 25 , 1984 Lam/ WAYN12'L0__F_TUff anninq Director City of Atascadero, California cc: City Council City Manager City Attorney Planning Commission Dennis Bethel and Associates Casa Camino Properties MJ O' Brien CM Colombo FILE Victor Mori Jr. Holiday Paper Products Inc. JOE3 , BH Baker G Wood c/o JK Nelson Ey MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Directors THROUGH: Mike Shelton , City Manager FROM: Paul M. Sensibaugh, Director of Public Works SUBJECT : Appeal of Sewer Fee DATE: April 20, 1987 Recommendation : Staff recommends that the Board deny the appeal of payment of the Sewer Annexation Fee as requested by Mr . & Mrs . Kelly in the attached letter . Background: The City notified property owners in July of 1986 that all properties currently on "Stand-by" would be required to connect to the sewer system by July l of this year or face fines . Stand-by properties are those which have sewer available and are paying a sewer availability fee and should be connected but are not . This case is further complicated by the fact that the Kelly' s septic tank has failed and the need to connect to the sewer is immediate . Apparently Mr . & Mrs . Kelly purchased their house under the assumption that it was connected to sewer and it is on this point that they are requesting relief . It is staff' s opinion however, that the District was not responsible for the misinformation and therefore cannot agree to the waiver of the fee . Fiscal Impact: The Annexation Fee is $1210 . 00 . s i March 20 , 1987 Dear City Council Board of Directors , We purchased our home at 7620 Santa Ynez ,Atascadero three years ago ,with the understanding we were hooked up to city sewer. Around July 1986 we received a letter from Atascadero Public Works Department stating we were not on city sewer and had one year in which to •hook up . Needless to say,we were sure it was a mistake and called to clear the matter up . We were told according to records we were not on sewer and it was suggested we have a dye test done ,which we did . It showed we were indeed not on the sewer system. Recently again we received a .letter from the Public Works Dept . saying our septic system has failed ,and we must hook up as soon as possible. We want to clear this matter up as fast as possible ,and have spent many hours trying to get help and or answers . The previous owner states she also was under the assumption,when she purchased the property in 1980 ,that it was on sewer . We tried to find records both in San Luis Obispo County Court House and in Atascadero ,with no results . Our personal files also state nothing in reguards to the sewer. We feel this delima is not of our doing and are appealing to you under Consolidated Ordance Code 12 . 3 for relief . We are requesting the annexation fee of $1 , 210 . 00 . be waived because of the above circumstances we now find ourselves in. If we can provide any further information ,please contact us at the address or phone numbers below. Thank you for reviewing our application. Terry and Darcy Kelly 7620 Santa Ynez Atascadero , Ca . 93422 Home-466-7111 Terry (work) 543-4985 • Darcy (work) 434-0213 — LIM ADMINISTRATION BUILDING Cap w POST OFFICE BOX 747 ATASCADERO,CALIFORNIA 93423 PHONE: (805) 466.8000 POLICE DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 747 ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA 93423 CITY COUNCIL PHONE: (805) 466.8600 CITY CLERK ase eiC® CITY TREASURER Y CITY MANAGER INCORPORATED JULY 2. 1979 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 6005 LEWIS AVENUE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA 93422 PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT - PHONE: (805) 466-2141 w January 14, 1987 Darcy & Kerry Kelly 7600 Santa Ynez Atascadero, CA ¢173422 SUBJECT: Residence at 7620 Santa Ynez Dear Mr. & Mrs. Kelly: The Community Development p ent Department, upon receiving complaints from residents in the area, investigated the report of a failed septic system at the subject address. Their investiga- tion revealed that the septic system had indeed failed and that waste was draining into the creek. The matter was turned over to the Public Works Depart- ment due to the fact that this property is within the Sanitation District and is required to be connected to the public sewer sys- tem. Immediate attention to this matter is requested. Please contact me at 466-8000 ext. 109 to discuss the procedure for cor- recting this problem. Sincerely VALERIE J. HUMPHREY Public Works Department y • March 20 , 1987 Dear City Council Board of Directors , We purchased our home at 7620 Santa Ynez ,Atascadero three years ago ,with the understanding we were hooked up to city sewer. Around July 1986 we received a letter from Atascadero Public Works Department stating we were not on city sewer and had one year in which to •hook up . Needless to say,we were sure it was a mistake and called to clear the matter up . We were told according to records we were not on sewer and it was suggested we have a dye test done ,which we did. It showed we were indeed not on the sewer system. Recently again we received a .letter from the Public Works Dept . saying our septic system has failed ,and we must hook up as soon as Possible. We want to clear this matter up as fast as possible ,and have spent many hours trying to get help and or answers . The previous owner states she also was under the assumption,when she purchased the property in 1980 ,that it was on sewer. We tried to find records both in San Luis Obispo County Court House and in Atascadero ,with no results . Our personal files also state nothing in reguards to the sewer. We feel this delima is not of our doing and are appealing to you under Consolidated Ordance Code 12 . 3 for relief . We are . requesting the -annexation fee of $1 ,210 . 00 . be waived because of the above circumstances we now find ourselves in. If we can provide any further information ,please contact us at the address or phone numbers below. Thank you for reviewing our application . Terry and Darcy Kelly 7620 Santa Ynez Atascadero , Ca . 93422 Home-466-7111 Terry (work) 543-4985 Darcy (work) 434-0213 ADMINISTRATION BUILDING CITY ATTORNEY sh±STb FFICE BOX 747 POST OFFICE BOX 606 ATASCADERO. CALIFORNIA 93423 ATASCADERO.CALIFORNIA 93423 PHONE: (805) 466-8000 PHONE: (805)466-4422 CITY COUNCIL ,e ® � CITY CLERK POLICE DEPARTMENT lb CITY TREASURER POST OFFICE BOX 747 CITY MANAGER INCORPORATED JULY 2. 1979 ATASCADERO. CALIFORNIA 93423 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT PHONE: (805) 466-8600 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ....�. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT 6005 LEWIS AVENUE ATASCADERO. CALIFORNIA 93422 � PHONE: (805) 466.2141 June 27, 1986 Property Owner; Our records indicate that you own property in the Atascadero County Sanitation District which is not connected to the sewer system. Section 3.3 of the Atascadero County Sanitation Ordinance Code requires that when public sewer becomes available to build- ings served by private sewage disposal systems (septic tanks) that said building shall be connected to the public sewer within 24 months and the private disposal system be abandoned in accordance with the Uniform Plumbing Code. Public sewer was made available to your property upon completion of the collection system in 1970. Due to limited treatment plant capacity the County did not actively enforce the Ordinance at that time. The Board of Directors (City Council) , upon recommendation . from staff, has agreed to extend to the property owners an addi- tional year in which to connect without imposing fines as pro- vided for in the Ordinance. You are hereby notified that you have until July 1, 1987 to connect to the public sewer system in accordance with the District Ordinance or be subject to the fines accorded therein. The fees for connection to the public sewer system are as follows: $1, 210 Annexation Fee 573 Connection Fee 250 Tap-In Fee (If no existing lateral) 20 Encroachment Pmt. (If no existing lateral) 5 Permit Fee Sewer connection permits can be obtained by contacting the Public Works Department. A permit to abandon your septic system must also be obtained from the Building Division of the Community Development Department. 0 0 If you have any questions regarding this process, please contact this office. Very truly yours, ����/♦ V..�II�i�<•-.SLY,- V PAUL M. SENSIBAUGH /VJ Director of Public Works 2