HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 02/23/1987 CINDY WILKINS
DEPUTY CITY CLERK
A G E N n A
ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
ATASCADERO ADMINISTRATION BUILDING
FOURTH FLOOR, ROTUNDA ROOM
FEBRUARY 23., 1937
7:30 P. M.
RULES OF PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
* Members of the audience may speak on any item on the agenda.
* A person may speak for three (3) minutes. If a group has a
spokesperson, the spokesperson may speak for five (5) minutes.
* No one may speak for a second time until everyone wishing to
speak has had an opportunity to speak.
* No one may speak more than twice on any item.
* Council members may question any speaker ; the speakers may
respond; but after the alloted time has expired, may not
initiate further discussion.
* The floor will then be closed to public participation and open
for Council discussion.
Call to Order
Pledge of Allegiance
Invocation
Roll Call
** Recognition Plaque Presentation to Michael Moore, Dial-A-Ride
Location Supervisor
(Approximate Time 30 min. )
COMMUNITY FORUM
The City Council values and encourages exchanges of ideas and comments
from you the citizen. To increase the effectiveness of Community
Forum, the following rules of public participation will be strictly
enforced:
* A maximum of 30 minutes will be allowed for Community Forum,
unless Council authorizes an extension.
* All remarks shall be addressed to Council as a whole and not
to any individual member thereof.
1
*
No questions shall be asked of a Council Member or City Staff
without permission of the Mayor
* No person shall be allowed to make slanderous, profane, im-
pertinent, or personal remarks against any Council Member.
* Any person desiring to submit written statements may do so by for-
warding to Council prior to the Council Meeting nine (9) copies to
the City Clerk by 5:00 p.m. on the Wednesday preceeding the
Council Meeting.
(Approximate Time 5 min. )
A. CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters listed under Item A, Consent Calendar, are considered
to be routine and will be enacted by one motion in the form listed
below. There will be no separate discussion of these items.
A member of the Council or public may, by request, have any item
removed from the Consent Agenda, which shall then be added to and
taken u at the end of the "New Business" agenda.
P g
1. Approval of Minutes of Regular Council Meeting of February 10,
1987
2. Approval of Finance Director ' s Monthly Report—January, 1987
3. Approval of Treasurer ' s Monthly Report - January, 1987
4. Recognition of January Employee of the Month - George Wolfrank,
Public Works Department
5. Approval of Tentative Parcel Map 38-86 - 9110 Atascadero Ave.
Subdivision of 2 Parcels at 1.83 Acres into 3 Lots of . 58, .61,
.64 Acres Each - Schmidt/Kenneth Wilson
6. Approval of Tentative Tract Map 39-86 - 9359 Musselman -
Creation of 10 Air-Space Condominium Units with Common Area
on .94 Acre Site Norton/Cuesta Engineering
7. Approval of Tentative Tract Map 1-87 8865 Morro Road -
Creation of 6 Office Condominiums from a 6 Unit Office
Project Currently Under Construction Milosevic
8. Approval of Tentative Lot Line Adjustment 2-87 - 4900 San
Benito - Adjusting Property Line between 2 Existing Lots -
Sibbach/Volbrecht
9. Acceptance of Final Tract Map 28-85 - 8935 Morro Road -
Day/Kennaly Engineering
10. Acceptance of Final Lot Line' Adjustment 11-85 - 4370/4390 Rosita
Avenue - Jewell/Stewart
2
. 11. Acceptance of Final Parcel Map 34-86 - 8730 Coromar Road -
Bryson/Volbrecht Surveys
12. Acceptance of Final Parcel Map AT 830311:1 - 3100/3150 Ardilla
Davis/Twin Cities Engineering
B. HEARINGS, APPEARANCES, AND REPORTS
(Approximate Time - 30 Minutes)
1. Appeal of Planning Commission Denial on Tentative Parcel Map 35-86
application - 7503 Carmelita - Subdivision of a 3.53 Acre Parcel
into 3 Lots of 1.06, 1.23, and 1.26 Acres Each - Thomas Bench
(Approximate Time - 30 Minutes)
2. General Plan Amendment 1D-87 and Zone Change 20-86 - Del Rio
Road/E1 Camino - Amending the General Plan by Expanding the Urban
Services Area and Amending Zoning from Commercial Neighborhood to
Commercial Retail - Cropper/Twin Cities Engineering, Williams
House of Carpets/Idler/Lilley (Planning Commission Recommending
Denial)
(Approximate Time 30 Minutes)
3. General Plan Amendment 1C-87 and Zone Change 27-86 - E1 Corte/_
E1 Dorado Study Area - Peterson Development Company/Stephen
Devencenzi
A. Public Hearing
B. Resolution 22-87 - Approving Amendment to the General
Plan Land Use Map from Moderate Density Single Family
Residential to High Density Single Family Residential
C. Ordinance 147 Amending Official Zoning Maps from
Residential Single Family (RSF-Y) to Limited Single
Family (LSF-X)
(Approximate Time - 30 Minutes)
4. Architectural Standards Review Committee Proposed "Appearance
and Review Manual"
C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
(Approximate Time - 5 Minutes)
1. Mayor to Enter into Agreement with Lee Wilson Electric - Traffic
Signal Maintenance Contract - $1,800 Annually (Cont'd from
1/26/87)
3
(Approximate Time - 5 Minutes)
2. Ordinance 145 - Amending the Official Zoning Maps by Revising
the Minimum Lot Size in Limited Single Family Residential (LSF-X
and Residential Single Family (RSF-X) from 1/2 Acre Without Sewer
to 20,000 Square Feet With Sewer —City Wide Areas
(SECOND READING) (Cont'd from 2/10/87)
(Approximate Time - 5 Minutes)
3. Ordinance 144 - Amending the Official Zoning Maps from
Residential Multiple Family, 16 Units/Acre (RMF-16 (FH) to
Commercial Retail (FH) 6280 Tecorida (SECOND READING)
(Cont'd from 2/10/87)
D. NEW BUSINESS
(Approximate Time - 15 Minutes)
1. Administration Building - Rotunda Use/Acoustical Report:
A. Rotunda Ad Hoc Committee Recommendations on Accoustics
and Sound System
B. Authorization for City Manager to Enter into Agreement -
Bruce Walker Consultants - Design of Accoustical/Sound
System Improvements
(Approximate Time - 5 Minutes)
2. Atascadero Creek Bridge:
A. Authorization to Solicit Request for Proposals - Bridge
Spanning Atascadero Creek- Traffic Circulation Study and
Impact Mitigation Analysis
B. Authorization for City/School Committee to Appoint Selected
Consultant
(Approximate Time 5 Minutes)
3. Authorization to Purchase Computer and Printer for Planning
Department - $2,603.36
E. ATASCADERO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
(Council will recess and convene as the Atascadero County
Sanitation District Board of Directors)
(Approximate Time - 30 Minutes)
1. President to Enter into Sewer Extension Reimbursement Agreement -
. with John and Shelly Le Jeal Parcel A of 22-PM-97 (Lobos Avenue)
(Approximate Time - 15 Minutes)
2. Extension of Sewer Service - Curvado Circle:
4
0 9
. A. Public Hearing
B. Resolution 23-87 - Extension of Sewer Service to Lot
215, Block NC (Curvado Circle) and Incorporating the
Area into Sanitation Improvement District #4 Boundaries
(Approximate Time - 10 Minutes)
3. President to Enter into Agreement with Atascadero Unified
School District - Sewer Reinbursement Agreement on San Gabriel
School Site
F. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION
1. City Council
2. City Attorney
3. City Clerk
4. City Treasurer
5. City Manager
VIII
ETIl9G AGENDA
Tc -7 ITEM
. ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL
MINUTES
February 10 , 1987
Atascadero Administration Building
The regular meeting of the Atascadero City Council was called to order
at 7:30 p.m. by Mayor Mackey, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance.
An invocation was given by Pastor Guy Godrey, Faith Baptist Church.
ROLL CALL}
Present: Councilmembers Borgeson, Handshy, Molina, Norris and
Mayor Mackey
Absent: None
STAFF
Mike Shelton, City Manager ; Henry Engen, Community Development Direc-
tor; Paul Sensibaugh, Public Works Director; Jeffrey Jorgensen, City
Attorney; Bud McHale, Police Chief; Mike Hicks, Fire Chief; Boyd
Sharitz, City Clerk; Cindy Wilkins, Deputy City Clerk
Mayor Mackey presented the 1985-86 CTS, Inc. , President's Award of
Excellence for Demand/Responsive Transit Operations to Mike Moore on
behalf of Dial-A-Ride, which has been so honored in the years 182-183,
' 83-184, and 184-185 as well. Mike, who has been with Dial-A-Ride
since its beginnings here approx. 6 years ago, is soon leaving.
Chief Hicks, AFD, introduced new employee Kurt Stone, Firefighter.
COMMUNITY FORUM - No public comments.
A. CONSENT CALENDAR
1. Approval of Minutes of Regular Council Meeting of January 26, 1987
2. Denial of Claim by Mary Phillips in the Amount of $162, 407. 88
3. Approval of Establishing Stop Intersections at:
A. Resolution 17-87 - Cayucos at San Anselmo
B. Resolution 18-87 - Cayucos at Valdez
C. Resolution 19-87 - Nogales at Dulzura
D. Resolution 20-87 - Dulzura at Gancho
4. Approval of Resolution 16-87 - Establishing a 30-Minute Parking
Limit - South Side of Cascada Ave. from El Camino 145 Feet East
• 5. Acceptance of Final Lot line Adjustment 7-87 - 9099 La Linia
Shores/Volbrecht Surveys
Councilwoman Borgeson requested Item #4 be pulled for separate dis�-
sion (moved to New Business) .
MOTION: By Councilman Handshy to approve Al-5, minus #4, seconded by
Councilwoman Norris; passed unanimously by roll-call.
B. HEARINGS, APPEARANCES AND REPORTS
1. General Plan Amendment 1G-87 and Zone Change 30-86, City-Wide
Areas
A. Public Hearings
B. Resolution 9-87 - Approving Amendment to the General Plan
Land Use Map Revising Minimum Lot Size from 1/2 Acre Without
Sewer to 20, 000 Sq. Ft. with Sewer in High Density Single Fam-
ily Areas with Sewer
C. Ordinance 145 - Amending Official Zoning Maps Revising the
Minimum Lot Size in the Limited Single Family Residential
(LSF-X) and Residential Single Family, 1/2 Acre Minimum
(RSF-X) Areas (FIRST READING)
Mr. Engen, Commun. Devel. Director, gave staff report and responded to
questions from Council.
Public Comment
John Falkenstein, Cuesta Engineering, spoke in support of this mea-
sure, noting that its adoption will enable those in his profession to
give their clientele representation on a straight-forward approach
(eliminating many of the "maybe' s" on lot split questions) .
Art Cunningham, 8495 El Dorado Rd. , asked if the Peterson project was
included in this issue; Mr . Engen responded it is not included yet, as
it is coming to Council at a future meeting. Mr. Cunningham contended
that, if 20, 000 sq. ft. lots are approved, there is no need for an
LSF-X designation since ownership of a horse, cow or pig on a 1/2 acre
would be, effectively, eliminated according to his understanding of
the current ordinance regarding animal use (noting the requirement for
a full half acre of 21,780 sq. ft. ) . Mr. Engen responded that, al-
though the wording is somewhat complicated, the ordinance does have
provisions for pre-existing farm animals in the residential single
family areas and is understood by those owning animals in that zone.
MOTION: By Councilman Molina to adopt Res. No. 9-87, seconded by
Councilman Handshy; passed by 4 :1 roll-call, with Council-
woman Borgeson opposed.
MOTION: By Councilman Molina to read Ord. 145 by title only, seconded
by Councilman Handshy; passed unanimously. Mayor Mackey read
Ord. 145 by title.
MOTION: By Councilman Molina that this constitutes the first reading
of Ord. 145, seconded by Councilman Handshy; passed 4:1, with
Councilwoman Borgeson opposed.
2. General Plan Amendment 1E-87 and Zone Change 28-86 - 6280 Tecorida
- Grinnell
A. Public Hearing
B. Resolution 8-87 - Approving Amendment to the General Plan
Land Use Map from High Density Multi-Family to Retail Commer-
cial
C. Ordinance 144 - Amending Official Zoning Maps from Residen-
tial Multiple Family, 16 Units/Acre to Commercial Retail
(FIRST READING)
Mr. Engen, Commun. Devel. Director, gave staff report and responded to
questions from Council.
Public Comment
Sharon Morin, resident, spoke in favor of changing the zoning to ac-
commodate more revenue to have a hotel/motel at subject location, as
opposed to multi-family congestion; she also supports saving as many
trees as possible.
MOTION: By Councilman Handshy to adopt Res. No. 8-87, seconded by
Councilman Molina; passed unanimously by roll-call.
MOTION: By Councilman Handshy to read Ord. 144 by title only, second-
ed by Councilwoman Norris; passed unanimously. Mayor Mackey
read Ord. 144 by title and announced that this constitutes
the first reading.
C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Zone Change 29-86 - 8130-8300 El Camino Real Massicotte/Hinckley/
McNamara (related to General Plan Amendment 1F-87)
A. Ordinance 146 - Amending Official Zoning Maps from Industri-
al Park to Commercial Service (SECOND READING) (Cont'd from
1/26/87)
Mr. Engen, Commun. Devel. Director, gave staff report.
MOTION: By Councilwoman Norris to read Ord. 146 by title only, sec-
onded by Councilman Molina; passed unanimously. Mayor Mackey
read Ord. 146 by title.
MOTION: By Councilwoman Norris that this constitutes the second read-
ing and adoption of Ord. 146, seconded by Councilman Molina;
passed unanimously by roll-call.
2. Mayor to Enter into Contractual Agreement with John H. Ross
Assoc. dba Ross, Levin and MacIntyre for Architectural Servic .
on the Police Facility with Costs Not Exceeding $28,713 (Cont'd
from 5/12/86)
APD Chief McHale gave staff report and introduced Mr. Rodney Levin of
Ross, Levin & MacIntyre, present to answer questions. Mr. Levin
thanked staff and City Attorney for their hard work in putting this
contract together, noting his firm is looking forward to working with
the City on this project.
MOTION: By Councilman Molina to approve staff recommendation to auth-
orize the Mayor to sign an agreement contracting with the
S.L.O. firm of John H. Ross & Associates, Inc. , dba Ross,
Levin & MacIntyre Architects for architectural services to
include programming, site analysis and schematic design of a
police service facility for the City of Atascadero at an ini-
tial cost not to exceed $28,713, seconded by Councilwoman
Borgeson; passed unanimously by roll-call.
D. NEW BUSINESS
1. Authorization for Public Works Department to Solicit Request for
Proposals for Engineering Services on Design of San Andreas Bridge
and Garcia Road Bridge 0
Mr. Sensibaugh, Pub. Works Director, gave staff report and responded
to questions from Council. Due to concerns expressed by Council
regarding staff submittal of grant application prior to their auth-
orization, lengthy discussion focused on the issues involved in the
process of application for grant funds for these two bridges and
potential obligations by the City. Mr. Sensibaugh stressed the
timeliness involved regarding the City' s notification to the State
expressing its desire to be a candidate for grant funds when notified
of their availability. He noted that, had staff had opportunity to
address this proposal at the mid-year budget study session, funds from
this year ' s budget appropriation would not have been requested but
recommended as a consideration for the following year.
Councilman Molina noted that Council expressed the priority of the
street resurfacing program at the budget study session (a portion of
which may have to be postponed for one year should Council approve
this proposal) , and he recommended further research of funding alter-
natives.
Mr. Shelton, City Mgr. , noted the rapid timeframe of this particular
grant, noting it' s not always known at the outset of the fiscal year
what grant monies are going to be available. He also noted that Coun-
cil will still have the opportunity to undergo a full, 5-year capital
improvement plan review, with this project as a potential.
! i
Mr. Sensibaugh responded to further Council questions relating to the
condition of subject bridges and urgency for structural improvements.
MOTION: By Councilwoman Borgeson to authorize the Director of Public
Works to request proposals for the engineering consulting
services for design of San Andreas Road & Garcia Road Brid-
ges, seconded by Mayor Mackey; failed by 3: 2 roll-call, with
Councilmembers Handshy, Molina and Norris opposed.
*2. Approval of Resolution 16-87 - Establishing a 30-Minute Parking
Limit - South Side of Cascada Ave. from E1 Camino 145 Ft. East
(* This item previously Item A-4. )
Councilwoman Borgeson expressed concern with regard to enforcement of
this parking limit due to limited personnel available. Mr. Sensibaugh
reviewed the history of this issue, reviewing the staff report (in
agenda packet) .
Public Comment
Vance Weber, Owner of Open Air Flowers, explained the continual
parking problem on Cascada with no parking allowed on ECR; he feels
approval of a 30-minute parking limit will help new tenants in Lucky
Plaza tremendously.
MOTION: By Councilwoman Norris to adopt Res. 16-87 , seconded by Coun-
cilman Handshy; passed by 4:1 roll-call, with Councilwoman
Borgeson opposed.
E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION
City Council - Councilman Handshy commented on the bicentennial cel-
ebration of the signing of the Declaration of Independence, noting
the City of Morro Bay recently approved funds in support; he urged
Council support and, possibly, soliciting support from the County
for an over-all, rotating effort. Also, he proposed engaging com-
munity planning students from Cal Poly to do a diarama/rendering of
what downtown redevelopment might look like (he recently read that
Fresno State students had done same for downtown Fresno) .
City Attorney - Announced Council needs to have a closed session,
pursuant to Govt. Code Sec. 54956.9 (b) , involving significant expo-
sure to litigation.
MEETING ADJOURNED AT 9 :30 P.M. TO A CLOSED SESSION (SEE CITY ATTORNEY
COMMENT ABOVE) . CLOSED SESSION ADJOURNED AT 9 :45 P.M. ; MAYOR MACKEY
ANNOUNCED THAT NO DECISION WAS REACHED. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 9:45
P.M.
i •
MINUTES RECORDED BY:
BOYD C. SHARITZ, City Clerk
MINUTES PREPARED BY:
CINDY WILKINS, Deputy City Clerk
• February 18, 1987
To All Council Members:
The breakdown detail on all accounts is available
for your viewing in the Finance Department.
David Jorgensen
Admin. Services Director
•
3
CITY OF ATASCADERO •
FINANCE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
JANUARY 1, 1987 TO JANUARY 31, 1987
BALANCE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1986 19,998. 59
- DEPOSITED BY TREASURER, SEE RECEIPTS,
TREASURER'S REPORT, PAGE 1 776,985. 99
TOTAL 796,984. 58
HAND CHECK REGISTER DATED 01/31/87 248,915. 73
CHECK REGISTER DATED 01/09/87 94,086.34
CHECK REGISTER DATED 01/16/87 138,923.21
CHECK REGISTER DATED 01/23/87 73,718.59
CHECK REGISTER DATED 01/30/87 117,353.98
SERVICE CHARGE-MASTERCARD 2. 50
EXPENSE LISTING 161,583.35
TOTAL 834, 583. 70
BALANCE AS OF JANUARY 31, 1987 (37, 599.12)
PETTY CASH 540.00
TREASURY INVESTMENTS
SEE TREASURER'S REPORT, PAGE 2 3,786 ,000 .00 •
TOTAL 3,748,940.88
I, DAVID JORGENSEN, do hereby certify and declare
that demands enumerated and referred to in the foregoing
register are accurate and just claims against the City and
that there are funds available for payment thereof in the
City Treasury.
. DATED: February 18, 1987
DAVID JORMSEN
Admin. Services Director
4
0 !
CITY OF ATASCADERO
FINANCE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
JANUARY 1, 1987 TO JANUARY 31, 1987
EXPENSE LISTING
PAYROLL DATED 01/07/87 CHECKS #38206-38334 79,638. 68
PAYROLL DATED 01/21/87 CHECKS #38369-38480 83,048.91
VOID CK#29591 CK. REG. DATED 12/31/86 (48.00)
VOID CK#29592 CK. REG. DATED 12/31/86 (125.00)
VOID CK#32947 CK. REG. DATED 01/09/87 (422. 50)
VOID CK#32082 CK. REG. DATED 10/31/86 (231.93)
VOID CK#32784 CK. REG. DATED 12/19/86 (250 .00)
VOID CK#33067 CK. REG. DATED 01/16/87 (16.81)
VOID CK#33201 CK. REG. DATED 01/23/87 (10.00)
TOTAL 161,583.35
5
MEETiNv AGENDA
• • DATE B�ITFM
CITY OF ATASCADERO
• TREASURER'S REPORT
JANUARY 1, 1987 TO JANUARY 31, 1987
RECEIPTS
TAXES
Property Tax 23,980.80
Cigarette Tax 6,922.29
Motor Vehicle "In Lieu" 50,833.41
Sales Tax 87,000.00
Franchise Tax 2,892.19
Livestock-Head Day Tax 68.04
Occupancy Tax 14,097.39
Development Impact Tax 18,632.50
LICENSES/PERMITS/FEES 43,597.35
DEVELOPMENT FEES 39,710.76
PARKS & RECREATION FEES 14,500.52
LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND 225,000.00
TRANSPORTATION SB-325 84,413.00
STREET ASSESSMENT 20,172.47
• TRAFFIC SAFETY 8,896.98
MISCELLANEOUS
Narcotic' s Officer 2,908.33
New England Life Refund 147 .27
Zoo Reserve 130.00
Sale Maps/Publications/Reports 268.10
Special Police Services 48.00
Fines & Penalties 1,030.60
Planning. Permit Deposits (1,808.00)
Bails/Bonds 1,055.00
Business Improvement Assn. Fee 891. 50
Overages & Shortages 02
P.O.S.T. Reimbursement 2,600.14
Reimburse to Expense 159. 89
Performance Bond 600.00
Rents/Concessions 257.67
Refunds 486.75
Sanitation Reimbursement 79,179.17
Weed Abatement 10,681.42
Off-Highway Vehicles 172. 22
Miscellaneous 1,380.22
Investment Earnings 36,079.99
TOTAL 776,985.99
1
CITY OF ATASCADERO •
TREASURER'S REPORT
JANUARY 1, 1987 TO JANUARY 31, 1987
INVESTMENTS
LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND $3,786,000. 00
TOTAL INVESTMENT DEPOSITS $3,786,000.00
•
Charles Bourbeau
City Treasurer
2
3e
!r
• M E M 0 R A'N D U M
TO: City Council Members February 23, 1987
FROM: Mike Shelton, City Manager
SUBJECT: EMPLOYEE OF THE MONTH NOMINATION - JANUARY
RECOMMENDATION:
Council recognize George Wolfrank, Senior Civil Engineer, as
"Employee of the Month" for January, 1987. -
BACKGROUND:
George was nominated for this title due to his diligence in
researching, applying for, and successfully acquiring two Federal
grants for new bridges in Atascadero along with an array of other
leadership examples provided in the nomination.
cc: George Wolfrank
Personnel File
Public Works Department
File: MEmploy2
TINGIYTZ- AGN7A
7 um
• M E M 0 RAND U M
TO: City Council January 23, 1987
VIA: Michael Shelton, City Manager
FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Tentative Parcel Map 38-86
LOCATION: 9110 Atascadero Avenue
APPLICANT: Gary Schmidt (Kenneth Wilson)
REQUEST: Request to subdivide two parcels containing 1. 83
acres into three lots containing 0.58, 0.61, and 0.64
acres
On February 2, 1987, the Planning Commission conducted a public
hearing on the above-referenced matter and recommended approval
• of request subject to the findings and conditions contained in
the attached staff report.
HE:ph
CC: Gary Schmidt
Kenneth Wilson
Attachment : Planning Commission Staff Report, dtd. Feb. 2 , 1987
•
City of Atascadero Item: B.6 •
STAFF REPORT
FOR: nn Planning Commission Meeting Date: Feb. 2, 1987
BY:01
Steven L. DeCamp, Senior Planner File No: -TPM 38-86
Project Address: 9110 Atascadero Avenue
SUBJECT:
Subdivision of two parcels containing 1.83 acres into three lots con-
taining 0. 58, 0.61, and 0.64 acres.
BACKGROUND:
Notice of public hearing was published in the Atascadero News on Fri-
day, January 23, 1987. All property owners of record located within
300 feet of .the subject property were alwo notified on that date.
A. SITUATION AND FACTS:
1. Applicant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Gary Schmidt •
2. Representative. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Kenneth Wilson
3. Site Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1.83 acres
4. Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .RSF-X (Residential Single
Family - 0.5 acre min. lot
size)
5. Existing. Use. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Single Family Dwelling on
Parcel X
Single Family Dwelling under
construction on Parcel Y
6. Adjacent Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .North: RSF-X
South: RSF-X
East: RSF-X
West: RSF-Y
7. General Plan Designation. . . . . .High Density Single Family
8. Environmental Status. . . . . . . . . .Negative Declaration posted
December 31, 1986
TPM-38-86
9110 Atascadero Avenue (Schmidt/Wilson)
Page Two
B. ANALYSIS:
The application before the Commission proposes the subdivision of
two parcels containing 1.83 acres into three parcels containing
0. 58 acres, 0.61 acres, and 0.64 acres. The property proposed for
subdivision is located in the RSF-X zoning district. The minimum
lot size in this zone is 0.5 acres. Each of the proposed lots
exceed this minimum lot size requirement.
The subject property currently contains a single family residence
on Parcel X. An additional single family dwelling is under con-
struction on Parcel Y. Proposed Parcel Z is vacant. The new lot
being created is located in front of the other two lots. Access
to these rear lots will be by easement crossing the front lot.
This easement will also serve as a Public Utilities Easement
allowing the rear lots to be connected to existing utilities in
Atascadero Avenue.
The area surrounding the subject parcel was the subject of recent
General Plan and Zoning Ordinance amendments allowing for the
establishment of one-half acre lots. The proposal before the Com-
mission is in conformance with the new General Plan and Zoning
Ordinance provisions. Staff believes that the type and density of
development proposed is appropriate for the neighborhood.
C. RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends conditional approval of Tentative Parcel Map
38-86 based on the Findings in Exhibit C and the Conditions of
approval in Exhibit D.
SLD:ph -
ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A - Location and Zoning Map
Exhibit B - Tentative Parcel Map
Exhibit C - Findings for Approval
Exhibit D - Conditions of Approval
k1l rim
•F �'�� Al ' ♦ ��'' �ii� � �� _
WIN
FM
�� IFNAM
ISE ,.�' ►•`,'�i 0� I�iy Sys 1r
PAP
WA
bo
Sill
v .�
til► . 3�■
� 1
tu
Q a
PM 38 -8&
40
4i f a
'-
- W
P
N '
N
TA \ ol +
CV
v n
Qcp
\ Q V
O
2
N '
J
• 3 �
.�y •��\ � � Aro Q�
j U Q
BBO' �
Q
_ cl —
�� ,tea- \
\ N
` a •p v e� U°W .�
r U'
670,
n
•p 4W AO..`r N �I 96j
W Ae 43�I �� 0
F c f
i
5
'S'
3 � �
v J�
o
•
EXHIBIT C - Tentative Parcel Map 35-86
Findings for Approval
February 2, 1987
FINDINGS:
1. The creation of these parcels conforms to the Zoning Ordinance and
the General Plan.
2. The creation of these parcels, in conformance with the recommended
Conditions of Approval, will not have a significant adverse effect
upon the environment. The Negative Declaration prepared for the
project is adequate.
3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development pro-
posed.
5. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements will
not cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and
avoidably injure fish and wildlife or their habitat.
6. " The design of the subdivision and the type of improvement will
conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for acce*
through or use of property within the proposed subdivision; or
that substantially equivalent alternate easements are provided.
7. The proposed subdivision complies with Section 66474. 6 of the
State Subdivision Map Act as to methods of handling and discharge
of waste.
• 0
EXHIBIT D - Tentative Parcel Map 38-86
Conditions of Approval
February 2, 1987
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. Water shall be obtained from the Atascadero Mutual Water Company
and water lines shall exist at the frontage of each parcel or its
public utility easement prior to recordation of the final map.
2. All existing and proposed utility easements, pipelines and other
easements are to be shown on the final map. If there are other
building or other restrictions related to the easements, they
shall be noted on the final map.
3. Grading, drainage, and erosion control plans, prepared by a reg-
istered civil engineer, shall be submitted for review and approval
by the Community Development and Public Works Departments prior to
recording the final map.
4. Drainage work and facilities shall be constructed to City of Atas-
cadero standards prior to recording a final map.
5. Wastewater disposal shall be by connection to the public sewer.
6. Obtain sewer connection permits from the Public Works Department
prior to hooking up to the public sewer.
7. A sewer annexation fee for the newly created parcel shall be paid
prior to recording the final map.
8. A sewer connection fee for each single family lot shall be due in
addition to usual connection, tap-in, and installation fees prior
to issuance of building permits.
9. Provide sanitary sewer easements to the existing sewer easement at
a size and location (s) acceptable to the City Engineer.
10. The existing fire hydrant at the intersection of Atascadero Ave.
and Portola Avenue shall be upgraded to City Standards prior to
recording the final map.
11. Obtain an encroachment permit from the City of Atascadero and con-
struct a City Standard drive approach as directed by the encroach-
ment permit prior to recording the final map.
12. Plan and profile drawings of proposed individual driveways, drive-
way easements and private roads shall be submitted for approval by
the Community Development and Public Works Departments in order to
determine average grade and appropriate improvement requirements.
• •
Conditions of Approval
TPM 38-36
Page Two
13. Road improvements to the private road shall be to the following
standard and shall be completed prior to recording the final map:
a. 16 foot wide all-weather traveled way.
b. 20 foot wide graded road bed.
14. A road maintenance agreement, in a form acceptable to the City
Attorney, shall be recorded with the deed to each parcel at the
time it is first conveyed, and a note to this effect shall be
placed on the final map.
15. That portion of the existing driveway shown "to be relocated" on
the tentative map shall be relocated prior to recording the final
map.
16. The existing power poles shown "to be removed" on the tentative
map shall be removed and the utilities to be relocated prior to
recording the final map.
17. An irrevocable offer of dedication to the City of Atascadero
the following right-of-way for future road purposes shall be m
and noted on the final map:
Street Name: Atascadero Avenue
Limits: Entire frontage of subject property
Minimum Width: 25 feet from the centerline
18. An offer of dedication to the public for the Public Utilities
Easements shall be made.
19. All offers of dedication shall be completed and recorded prior to
or simultaneously to recording the final map.
20. Participate in eliminating a portion of the flood hazard to the
property by posting a performance security with the City to be
used for a drainage improvement project for channelizing the out-
flow from Atascadero Lake to Atascadero Creek. In the event that
a future assessment district is formed for the area drainage im-
provements that include this project, then credit in the amount of
the deposit will be applied towards final apportionment of the
assessment if allowed by the assessment district proceedings.
This shall appear as a note on the final map.
21. A final map drawn in substantial conformance with the approved
tentative map and in compliance with all conditions set for
herein shall be submitted for review and approval in accorda
with the Subdivision Map Act and the City Lot Division Ordinanc
prior to recordation.
• •
Conditions of Approval ~
TPM 38-36
Page Three
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - Cont'd
a. Monuments shall be set at all new property corners created and
a registered civil engineer or licensed land surveyor shall
indicate, by certificate on the final map, that corners have
been set or shall be set by a date specific and that they will
be sufficient to enable the survey to be retraced.
b. A recently updated preliminary title report whall be submitted
for review in conjunction with the processing of the final
map.
c. A preliminary subdivision guarantee shall be submitted for
review in conjunction with the processing of the final map.
22. Approval of this tentative parcel map shall expire two years from
the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted
pursuant to a written request prior to the expiration date.
zz
•
M_E M_0 R A N D_U_M_
TO: City Council February 23, 1987
VIA: Michael Shelton, City Manager
FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Tentative Tract Map 39-86
LOCATION: 9359 Musselman
APPLICANT: Norm Norton (Cuesta Engineering) _
REQUEST: Request to create ten (10) air-space condominium
units with common area on a .94 acre site.
On February 2, 1987, the Planning Commission conducted a public'
hearing on the above-referenced matter and recommended approval
of request subject to the findings and conditions contained in
• the attached staff report.
HE:ph
cc: Norm Norton
Cuesta Engineering
Attachment : Planning Commission Staff Report, dtd. Feb. 2, 1987
•
City of Atascadero Item: g. 7 i
STAFF REPORT
FOR: Planning Commission Meeting Date: February 2, 1987
BY: Doug Davidson, Assistant Planner D-D File No: TTM 39-86
Project Address: 9359 Musselman
SUBJECT:
Creation of ten(10) air-space condominium units with common area
on a .94 acre site.
BACKGROUND:
Notice of public hearing was published in the Atascadero News on
January 23, 1987. All property owners of record located within
300 feet of the subject property were also notified on that date.
A. SITUATION AND FACTS:
1. Applicant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Norm Norton •
2. Representative. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Cuesta Engineering
3. Site Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .94 acres
4. Streets. : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Musselman-40 foot right-of-
way
5. Zoning. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .RMF/16 (Residential Multiple
Family, 16 units per acre
maximum
6. Existing Use. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Under construction
7. Adjacent Zoning and Use. . . . . . .North: RMF/16, Residential
South: RMF/16, Residential
East: Atascadero State Hos-
pital
West: RMF/16, Residential
8. General Plan Designation. . . . . .High Density Multiple Family
9. Environmental Status. . . . . ... . . .Categorically Exempt (Class 1)
Tentative Tract Map 39-86
9359 Musselman (Norton/Cuesta)
Page Two
B. - ANALYSIS:
This application proposes the creation of ten(10) air-space condo-
miniums. The project consists of the conversion of a ten (10)
unit apartment project, currently under construction, to indi-
vidual ownership. Thus, each unit will be individually owned, and
parking and open areas will be owned in common.
This project was previously reviewed and approved under the pre-
cise plan and building permit processes. All public improvements
that would normally be required at the time of tract map approval
have been secured or conditioned as part of these prior approvals.
Tentative tract map approval will not effect the ' imposition of
those requirements.
The conversion of the project to a condominium does not present
any substantial planning issues of concern to staff.
C. RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends conditional tional approval of Tentative Tract Map 39-86
based on the Findings in Exhibit D and the Conditions of Approval
in Exhibit E.
DD:ph
ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A - Location and Zoning Map
Exhibit B - Tentative Tract/Parcel Map
Exhibit C - Precise Plan Conditions of Approval
Exhibit D - Findings for Approval
Exhibit E Conditions of Approval
'i
(Po
\ � ♦ /baa� ♦♦♦
♦'
'moo o S iT E
J 6 O
� L ♦♦ �v <
4s
` /
„cQf� J �7 4 C• F / �( Tq�
CT CR
CT T
N
7C R
ic
g
•16
6
1444,10
ti
i
4KID
°��44 E X H 113 17 �4
n��s pp A
a �
a
Nt
oo�o o `roFo�ti v `"•• "' W R
_ 3l1N3A V VH 7.7 9nH -
_- u.eicsi
17.
_.•T. ssv 2
�
_ I i
• r
r
i 21 2
W
tz
N I
Z II
LI I
1
5 j �
2
j
L
e
0
1?
Ir
- i w
1
. 2
N
- r .y
xlcrt•Ri r� ;,� S r.
aSF'
���r;'EXHIBIT C _
recise Plan 34-86 t
9359 Musselman i , � ;. i a F; / �`�t \^: , ' `>> w ,,
'�� �` ,xr a �,\p Ca.y3i k�{}_v rY /yr\ F" { r b+'�."• L i !y\ A L •>•L .1 igt �rr
rr,(Norton/Elkins) f-�a 5� t Gln y tTF t St S v 1� 2 } rFf t '_it�f f
h t.a-r t/ K •Y,'S • ` y f _ + ri 'r x��,.. '.t a .. •�i` 8 v i t S+N r i'
s'r � g.y _•. c.y. - 1 L„ -.,>t r3 'j" a:3.y } 'x:✓ r y ..•r� Z
,?�iji `i�5�� c e•, ` t �' � *fit `r-cr`�"Y�f t: k �- h. ''�.?Y' ,ra •t 7Y.:t'a.: `'��trc��I
*��t y i!a
• '. 'h1<'-ahC'Se� r ./c y �,V, -tr art.. #''y ,.t.,rl.;-f }I�`�' t Z-- , a s r 3.
x. y S r`'r'sfrt y rJ1'r rpt•�ri .a rhx�.F.
Y1fi§v ,. �iL9bf�' ;4•�i'S �,}M� Jr.l'r.'' (/ \L l' v E -- 1 1i"' S�i..�r=�tx�t'rrF /Y�l�� L4''-•�('+ y4•C Ti a�'/�.,��,T'n '���.TC:
1� t; .. •*.w.if. X I-, r.. .,
� 1.'r All construction shall be in ':conformance , with Exhibit ;:8 (situ
x' ,xx 4; (conditions of a
at f plan) , : .;Exhibit _ C � Approval) and shall comply with
>
_� `all City codes and ordinances -Any modifications to this 'approval � .
E shall require approval by -,.the Community Development Department
A� q y�x' k�� prior to implementing -any
changes �j�3u >+
f�yyyy,.yr ##'a,'c• yl >pl4 i3iiglr'' 4 �x'�.
:i:'a u yC1,}fL3b;.t�r' P :'° ' �Ii'}P s��.{+ moi!-: �i-,, ,. •" "i r s". S..:a r '`rr xr•*r�.,r t.�'a ..,y +rstt �,Y� +S-:Xed
2 a�" c �'$ �°` ,�,�`��L`t�.� �;�"�,• e... ; ,� �.., �r�'
•3'`s.' 2 ..t.. r r tom^ �t*a'-.�,L Y' � k yr t �.[ t =1 J",;: r °L..��
,• t1 Complete landscaping and ;irrigation plans shall be submitted
sand subse dentl .
R � _ � q y :approved by, the Community Development Department,
= Ax prior to ';issuance of building permits (see Section 9-4.124 of -,;;'.'the
Zoning ; Ordinance) ^Parking areas which abut an adjacent 'residen `
'area shall be screened with solid fencing six feet in height �
t �� s fxF and a landscaped strip five feet wide
J/ r Gt
K fiT+s"i4, ti t, i t t FS —.1"'.- 1 t v ,7 u t:Y t� YGS.'�..
� ..�y 1F F.:h 4y� � � '�,
-i^ :." � eel. a
f rw yys r'..... r: i •J` 'x..rc ;`� _Section 9-4.129. •0',
3. A trash enclosure +shall be provided per 'The 'fac= xr <
Tr ility must be located within 100 feet of dwellings served and
.;. t{= �,�c scree+,ned with a solid barrier.
�l�xtrir�Qn: } `�.�rfi 2Lq��q. 't•'"'.'.'f'y"n'F':.� ..;Y.._} Z,r y 3.�,,F ��,t- ��Yl o 1 �-.� w S `!' rT't�N 5;4 !Y Y;p��r
�} xt -rf � � _• F... - `?'-�+.r ''<,�'s r.ii T��;'*'-C .] _.. > _o r ;'t.§ t,;,: t rti_ ::h i.XM � ' : o��q>�3.+d i'
L= - 4 The site plan shall be redesigned to provide the adequate ;•,turnip
«, ,f tradius =;(28 feet -,inside, -48 feet outside) for access roadways cN
{ -
2 `J F Dead-end access roads in excess of 150 feet lop must be f,
a 1 - g provide {
with proper ,turn-around for Fire Department apparatus. The site
ry < " plan does not meet this requirement. r
S f 5. _. Road laps improvement P p prepared by a registered) -civil engineery,t �
� �t y must be .' submitted to and approved by the Public Works Department / t
prior to final :inspection. Construction ' of road improvements :_
` shall be completed (or bonded for) prior to final inspection. �',T;
6 Obtain an encroachment permit from the Public Works Dep"artment
Sign an inspectionagreement , and a curb and gutter agreement
_ guaranteeing that the work will be done and inspections paid for aha
-.prior to the 'issuance of an building '
Y g permits, and construct im- '
' provements as directed by the encroachmentermit
P prior to f
building inspection. ... _
7. ' Grading anddrainageplans 'prepared by a registered civil en '
gineer
Ymust be submitted to and approved by the Public Works and Communis'
Development Departments prior to issuance of building -permits.
All lot grading and drainage improvements shall require written
+ M'certification by a registered civil engineer that all work has
> l`r
been completed and is in full compliance with the approved plans
8. The applicant shall make an offer of dedication to the Cit for
the following right-of-way _ -
• f t '
gra � :. .' .a Y,• ti _
( ' S - , -
1
.:} V...y:.�-
r tC r i 1
�'ti i , f s
T 14
,; .
f
jfy _iq t r i - t t_ 1.1 -
.11
- . .:�:�;� � , .! . I . � -,, , ;. �.", , ;�'. .-..� ,_z * ��',""..",,:-�,-, �, � � 4 ��
x4_.
10 feet adjacent to southerly property line along Musselman ' �
*`..,%�,.4 frontage. ,Minimum width of Musselman shall be 40 feet. :':This i. .r
4 �,f. ° , offer of dedication shall be completed leted and recorded '��
x ,r P prior to or q
,�,fiF,. !
( ,, simultaneously to final inspection: r; kI : r= a
t H1 {Y MyX ar. it'f, a C ]t -I' }. v t. 1 t T L F I! t '44 ^4" i...
4. � .
•�y* 4 .j r 4 , r .7.�,+.':t k ,f?.}:..4 t...'.�ii�,L_ .•u�t Y'!..'�. j ,I.}:: ,,:,.. .> �1,;:�r .+rc..-s.'., i a " � of i'� 75�.
_t�',;., 9 The applicant shall obtain a sewer connection, permit "from 'the Pub '('
;ri,art `i tic Works De artment fk `�� `
P prior to hooking up to the public ;'sewer. � A' �
oh
;I,� ' �a 4105-:sewer ;:;connection fee of $533.00 per dwelling unit `shall be due in' '-
Vt,"ra.`addition to the usual 'connection, tap-in, and installation fees;
s7
fs �{ i , ,„ prior to issuance of building ild in ermi is tI � a I v v j°, tajr�F° � 'I 4r o�.! .
„�; , r g P
K rt F t. 4 S j > t F e . yta S ✓ [A "h. y.�
.1 I -rr a �1Rir wr{, �}{[i '^�''`�•x�.,rQl �q NrKit rYt�`r_� �`:. ` - r.!' f} c '9. c
,.� >,r f ,jy lo,. 7i-ft• .�i, .'l.'Uti lsf., a ? .ki'.:e1 T4-rL i.'-``�`-17F. 'Y T+S.<✓'Nt.;'.f3 t_��.�. 1 !-1-:•► r ° irl !�,�, Y_lt }� , r t..'-1 P�7`;,'. � t�.
t r ��.� r x, Hi ,-
-. . :',_'�1 .ry'This precise plan is approved rfor a period of one year from the' N' "
.xY" ;�.'"��•�1 �t�1 . £'y ,,�date of final a }royal (Jul 9 1986 J -11y j q '
,.q r ,1 1;:' fr?lr i' 'Q r' i��,.•.� PP \ y / • _f ,,1 11 V.,;;`� P!}I�1.yryr r, 5� y°.rsr V'S-i t ti�&�..'3 io
i[.1', ,d:)k e Y :Y[4 Zri.` w 4.,.-a�1r �., t r ,y �_�v1 S �i..t G u +re• w y y�
y fiA.. awa
1t,,, �+y�,` n}f �y. E �+` "!. t� 'fr # 1 t Sl .� ke 1;.`t�"F r cwt 61.i
.,1 1 i. i•Pf'{.�{i •4 ..1: ,6 .�«.R'.: �j'^' d+ i �C ,, Jt ^�r� 't i:+ F' t.[d - 1 r'� -h']: rI t }'yt�9 a t!'�i 3.
tii'I)(}l,P�`� y.�'s i+1''++Y•'4- •,lrir t.k� ,'Y i� t' ',..VVV,"' .� T[.(� 4'' ri <. r is J :t s t,"r "1 t'a er �t f.,kitrkx Z`Ns+ � f
•.rt it tiyT,,t' .^,- �s 1', .. Si " �=-§ " - N' {-�. , C 4 ) �q ( ,I Y »'�./ } .
1i 1 a r a !., ". y'1 �<� Y Ii i �r� {�( oiit »i. r( 1 r �I stf ,�'i y At ti
�;,' $'. 'f 5,���,"-,R'RN, 1 .}e•�:t:,rr�;•$'ti:u,.• '"�-trt+t.' ' '�i .r-v r� ,.! ,r:-eti.�� `J•�r � � :x., n ���.{ r ? r s:ti�`a� Pr, J�.,,4 t.Jit ?�"
- r.-'f. :'$ (✓1 _Y"��• vti X. •�ittw•� f }if Si*' p t r r yi- ..t r ,, t• a vk y; s} sJ 1 .~:c v ,
.1•`y} y Y. �. 'S'X:Ky � i ,i;Xl i r 4e x fit+ 3 f?l S c�L . r � f �Sii 'y E.•- i n t .1 y.1 r}'ri .,} Mf= r• i i �1`� r
� ..t 'l r....r.)��4'1}(ay 1,i, -.:r R4�}, S r _ , ;Y. Y y + -1�9 ._y t ''. �'!'r Syc 1"f`[�Yt•. Yy{ t' S f.;
.,i P % r_�rti, tr% �ir_,ti `,r k'. ,�,t .�,,f '�.�.;r'�• >� hsvYr > :t•.1 aT a i-l; 3f „a...lrr ^a�i;�
...} a i (,•E4..1} }..•�.{ r�w1`?•�, ° r�} Vi•' r r' r':f �, 1^tont{�fi -it+Ki 1. { �- �' i ry N f ti+v.i>} x Y- .'> �.
Al L ': t y` �- !, t 11 yr,iti } ? ,)I• •.%}� ! i x9 lr..y } tY+; k ,�'> �,-.
'} X. ai tt 'rrf•.,1 �''�;T t.�l _ }A�i�'•�4 ?1.t `;T.. -,., SSS _t }.Vl of.���7aa'.r.}f�,.77 T _ r�:�1 5 � •� 1} �a.t� �,{.�1v,t�t
f .} ti 1 � { }.+rt .i r a :i rM t .Rr -! �:' s,. b a tr t r4Y,T"t`7 �`:'{iR
:t J yf 't�i�NK. s 4 c t ') i }y t S -.t I r c r,
,� r ? ,rf n „�^ M-r't-{yy"=��"'• t•�'/ ',:7F.'r,+r��, I}�.I�.,.�*1���}.,d £k`�4!{� +3 c;f cr.ii'•ar.r `�P.-\*`;;.,'k` r �, ''.' tf t7 T,N, a -St'r a ,�; li.G'.
y.,, _{ ti 1,76F�1�.t,,}'/,9.-,M l.�f.'.F �� i'>ri" x vr.r a{tl r.�4 r 1� .r?YJ_f.! Y..r„ 1 4 .,i .,� pi u,
r. :.,' zkR 7_,* 4r"j' �4,+. rr Y,� :�r.5t} r.i?fir Tr. ., .r i te."�1.i y •,n`f1F '•/v 1 i- 4t} 1 e+r .r'^}
tit... r n r#2 > t 4, 1 , i,. r i, a t : t I- � t ,i'� ► aFP
C f^ i �mNy..I r+f13t irr k. y a iC er t, r 1�Jrr�. r es [ E r}} e . r� l�y,a. �r jr
c �, ! eta: �{ ,, til t,a I F J'1,i r i t, tl.i P r ^ Itr ,7th ! f
r.,+t r ti� `.'t�p �`F[6�t�ferl� ;9 �',ytf 5,+ J- �1 i rra Sr` 1 f #r r J .r�•;1• i y Rc t r I cwt
I'll a y !_.§4
}}tt,''�i`� f ,.,d• !, 7th z St�(4.; j". '_k 's t -t[_,>^ r 4K t: , / r >LTi .�1yi t�, f + .
t IIq
s yl- r.` �?x:l r{` �1• i,{iN^,iy - }f �f_ ity,;! �.,. +T f �-r- 1t fJ:s ° << . , f-.• z y , a Z' !rq 11,,Y��f'`t ,'Mt"rif
V.- ir- r1 ! - T,!•; 1- to f �/'f3..r� < <j 1 rrrr.. ♦ . ., .�,c ' , S }•it J''��,dr
I. 1 r ",i i .,, Ii[I r�)r'1t t ,, y µ_`1 t ` k r rl , " t ...�•►�.dS'i�'I w f � �,)!Z. � Iv..�.ay f tl.nl r v'•t�.�Yz,`l�a S.
E e i:._ r r!k 1 41.., ,. f .d } t - ! 't al,���f'"!r.
' }, J rL,' F!I. nk Kra. "tett.,-N i�" ;circ �ia.',1 °' 4 s � .-t�1,r1 f t -.i; •r^h •.nta T .. I
1 I 1 . ,r falri Y,, .. y '� i �} 1i �,t4 �f� gt�}tt V r t r K-,
r- '?i(1 (1 >jt++'+Vr,`;f1 i{r cr- i t j. �l F R , L rrryF r J ,r--• r I 1 t 'i-! kb r"`C Y
Y l F K P'rr w -T t 7{ r-a t. 7 3 ff�`*;, Sl i { f J j-, u. ; k A�1 -f F'
Y r it t t rf a i C r [ t ° '� i Zr y1 *xr a r - +
,`•C5F r ? '}t' 'S-Z, 5�. ,'1•.' t �3�:'T t, lA tY 4 ..� rn i'„�y; st..St r ",r _ y 1 tr.iv 1, �,UK�v� #11Iy`I= a
i t < l a \ 1 rf r,y 1 -,I ,R }, t �z >"*S`-' T X.�t
O"I":I c-, r fr i a fi� "A}j'.I--, % - S1 t - r y r R.' a 1., .i.�L r r7.. �:.a t. Ktr i,{ �.+`
r i :lr f r t�f, S,l M rjr' ' + r R r f-0 'fit[ty;- r r ' c� a i.1 c
l b , l } Yom} r j + .iS t rr ! - > t L M r.:
I.1 ">',.. fii� ,�� r ori a =v E_ 1. 'f ` . rJ�,v tt F � ' `_.y"1 ta.- Fr a -•r'r, f ..�1
f 1
P , R S - J i; y,,,r r }.: r 1_ rf { ti _. 11 ,, i f j �_
-ti r i'h q -- - Y +.
1 r r f _t ., t r :. ;-' '+ F J ' f .,F T r ! 21 7 3� 'S i
�, 7 -.7*1 , ',t 'i [ t iP F r f 1 ? Y .i �s t• T.cGz+!° s
y. 1":I [r - _&f. +� 1 '`�r ; t. r$ -1 LW .t hr� r. rJ •+•- a .
~ fy fi}c dr -.,A,,2 it.i;1 1- t I;A 'tyX ' Y'i r t S,'.� *'r t•:_ __.J c tit a - `} '_ ~< rf[ T ..
1 f`I 4, . s f L:- f"Y ri t 1� - .t i i- r - y,r y r 6 a, > 11 4
'-J -r. i. i. f R 1T .�
r r rf y _� ��- '_r p} '' a •` .! ! t y...; f., .a e r 1 TC• ..
J� S _ 3 z� F 7 ( y .1% 4 J ;•
i L rr S J {R .'r ki. 4 , I Y ' t t
if, 3 r - �. 2 t ti .1 r
i..sem - r ti' t r - z �� _>>r'az 3._f Z „ �° ,i.. #: M of- -
`i. i s .! f J .r
r : , S. SF .f [ a
.r.. _
t _ _ _ = ,
',..5; t is a,{-.. - , ti ,•c` f ,, -.� r 1 •-
ar a.. Y -v r r-f s f - ,-�
y, i it + -Z z r i r 1 y`n T p- .
$�` t ;.$,.,, f7. s _ , d +? Yi.7 h J.y' �' t r. -a " �_ s {� +r a, 4:.
J
r J,f' --fir.. ,rt. i_ j,r- -,� t u r t r ti i�: r •' ..-•-�_; a i +.
.t , -•l .t - .t. J ',.� Y 4V r Fy. - .IL
- 1. - v 'f.` r - . ♦.{ P q
,,\ -Jtl _ x, _y. r . T u,i _�. i.
. 1'Y - w" r.., _. a. , .'yam
•; P f .'. ilt 1 .... i f r r :1.
I .
0
r � W4`
9 0
.
EXHIBIT D - Tentative Tract Map 39-86
Findings for Approval
February 2, 1987
FINDINGS:
1. The creation of these parcels conforms to the Zoning Ordinance and
the General Plan.
2. The creation of these parcels is categorically exempt from the
provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Section
15301 (k) ) .
3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development that
is proposed.
4. The site is physically suitable for the density of development
that is proposed.
5. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements will
not cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and
avoidably injure fish and wildlife or their habitat. 0
6. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvement will not
conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access
through or use of property within the proposed subdivision; or
that substantially equivalent alternate easements are provided.
7. The proposed subdivision complies with Section 66474. 6 of the
State Subdivision Map Act as to methods of handling and discharge
of waste.
i 1 •
EXHIBIT E -Tentative Tract Map 39-86
Conditions of Approval
February 2, 1987
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. The applicant shall establish Covenants, Conditions, and Restric-
tions (CC&Rs) for the regulation of land use, control of nuisances
and architectural control of all buildings.
a. These CC&Rs shall be submitted for review and approval by the
City Attorney and Community Development Department prior to
approval of the final map.
b. These CC&Rs shall be administered by a Condominium Homeowners
Association.
2. The common open space (Lot 11) shall be designated as a Public
Utilities Easement.
3. Submit a soils report or engineer ' s certification that existing
soils on the site are adequate to support proposed structures per
Chapter 70, subsection (e) of the Uniform Building Code. The date
of such reports, the name of the engineer making the report, and
the location where the reports are on file shall be noted on the
final map.
4. All conditions imposed on the project by Precise Plan 34-86 and
building permits shall be satisfied prior to recording the final
map. This shall include grading, drainage and road improvements
to be completed or bonded for to the satisfaction of the Director
of Public Works.
5. All requirements of state law (Subdivision Map Act) concerning the
conversion of occupied residential units to air-space condominiums
shall be complied with.
6. Wastewater disposal shall be connected to the public sewer , and
the applicant shall pay all appropriate fees in force at the time
of recordation of the final map, to include sewer connection fee
per single family dwelling unit as established by City Ordinance.
The sewer main shall be installed prior to recording final map.
7. Offers of dedication shall be completed and recorded prior to or
simultaneous to recording final map.
• 0
EXHIBIT E - TTM-39-86
Conditions of Approval
Page Two
8. Applicant shall pay a fair share of the cost for intersection im-
provements at E1 Camino Real and Musselman, as determined by the
City Engineer.
9. A final map, in compliance with all conditions set forth herein, `
shall be submitted for review and approval in accordance with the
Subdivision Map Act and the City Lot Division Ordinance prior to
recordation.
a. Monuments shall be set at all new property corners created
and a registered civil engineer or licensed land surveyor
shall indicate, by certificate on the final map, that corners
have been set or shall be set by a date specific and that
they will be sufficient to enable the survey to be retraced.
b. A recently updated preliminary title report shall be submit-
ted for review in conjunction with the processing of t
final map.
10. Approval of this tentative tract map shall expire two years from
the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted
pursuant to a written request prior to the expiration date.
OINGAG7NDA
FFT,=..+ {iEM
• M_E_MO_RANDUM_
TO: City Council February 23, 1987
VIA: Michael Shelton, City Manager
FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Tentative Tract Map 1-87
LOCATION: 8865 Morro Road
APPLICANT: Vladimir Milosevic
REQUEST: Request to create six (6) office condominiums from
a six (6) unit office project currently under
construction
On February 2, 1987, the Planning Commission conducted a public
hearing on the above-referenced matter and recommended approval
• of request subject to the findings and conditions contained in
the attached staff report.
HE:ph
cc: Vladimir Milosevic
Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report, dtd. Feb. 2, 1987
•
City of Atascadero Item: B.8
STAFF REPORT 'lei
FOR: City Planning Commission Meeting Date : February 2, 1987
BY: Doug Davidson, Assistant Planner File No: TTM 1-87
Project Address : 8865 Morro Road
SUBJECT:
To create six (6) office condominiums from a six (6) unit office project
currently under construction.
BACKGROUND:
Notice of public hearing was published in the Atascadero News on January
23, 1987 and all owners of property within 300 feet were notified on that
date.
A. SITUATION AND FACTS:
1. Applicant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Vladimir Milosevic •
2. Site Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .42 acre
3. Streets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .Morro Road is a divided
Arterial with a 100 foot
wide right-of-way.
4. Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .CP(PD3) (FH) -Commercial
Professional with a PD3
and Flood Hazard overlays
5. Existing Use. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Office Building under con-
struction
6. Adjacent Zoning and Use. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .North: CP(OD3) (FH)
to Entire Study Area South: CP(PD3) (FH)
East: RMF/16 (FH)
West : CR(PD3)
7. General Plan Designation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Commercial Professional
8. Environmental Status. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Categoriaclly Exempt (class 1
B. ANALYSIS :
This application proposes the creation of six commercial air-space
condominiums. The project consists of the conversion of an
office building to individual ownership. Thus , each office unit
will he i_ndividuallzj __. .. .' and n_arki_nq and other {, 7o y "41 '
owne c7 in common.
Staff Report - February 2, 1987
Tentative Tract Map 1-87
Page Two
ANALYSIS - Cont'd
This project was previously reviewed and approved under the precise
plan and building permit processes . All public improvements that
would normally be required at the time of tract map approval have
been secured or conditioned as part of these prior approvals.
Tentative tract map approval will not effect the imposition of those
requirements.
The conversion of the project to a condominium does not present any
substantial planning issues of concern to staff.
C. RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends conditional approval of Tentative Tract Map 1-87
based on the Findings in Exhibit D and Conditions of Approval in
Exhibit E.
0 DD:ph •
ATTACHMENTS : Exhibit A - Location and ZoningMap
P
Exhibit B - Tentative Tract Map
Exhibit C - Precise Plan Conditions of Approval
Exhibit D - Findings for Approval
Exhibit E Conditions of Approval
PIP
ME
600
mu111� OR WP
�.
�/ �i ��f 111■ � � � � ��
♦ •11 � � ���� ��Its, c - / � � �
x--
N N .
m 40MO AOA°
o m
Z
v 5
°o �
v —Ni
F fF
Z �
, O
II
iv >< i Fla
SR . . z
_
x• -$ � a z
_ ° +
r H 1
CVN R= n S R
or
n $
YS '
1
EXHIBIT C (REVISED)
Conditions of Approval
Precise Plan 25-85
8865 Morro Road
(Palmer/Milosevic)
1. All construction shall be in conformance with Exhibit B (site
plan) , Exhibit C (elevations) , and Exhibit D (conditions of ap-
proval) , and all. other applicable codes and ordinances of the City
of Atascadero.
2.. Landscape plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning De-
partment. These shall include a minimum of 10% of the interior
parking area to be landscaped and shall be provided with shade
trees at 30 feet on-center.
3. A 12.5 foot setback shall be maintained at the frontage of Amapoa,
with parking to be located outside of said setback area.
4. The parking area fronting Amapoa shall be screened with a six foot
high solid screen fence.
5. A letter from CalTrans which approves the encroachment and drain-
age of the project shall be provided to the City prior to the
issuance of building permits.
6. The handicapped stall shall be appropriately marked and posted as
per Section 9-4.115 (c) .
7. Construct curb, gutter, sidewalk, and local urban road section to
the •centerline of Amapoa. Submit road improvement plans designed
by a registered civil engineer to City standards for review and
approval by the Director of Public Works.
8. Submit a grading and drainage plan prepared by a registered civil
engineer addressing all the requirements called out in the zoning
ordinance under Section 9-3. 603 (FH) (Flood Hazard) Overlay Zone.
9. Submit design and calculations for detention basin prepared by" a
registered civil engineer. Construction of same shall be certi-
fied by the design engineer.
10. The relocation, raising or lowering of any public facilities re-
quired as a result of the road improvements shall be the sole
responsibility of the property owner.
11. Waste water disposal shall be by connection to the public sewer .
Secure a sewer connection permit from the Public Works Department
prior to hook-up.
12. The applicant shall enter into an agreement with the project at
8935 Morro Road (Day) to install a City standard fire hydrant to
be located between their properties.
13. Trash enclosures shall be located within 100 feet of the buildings
served in accordance with Section 9-4.129.
14. Signage shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department
prior to the issuance of any signage permits.
15. The property owner shall enter into an agreement with the city to
waive their right to protest to the formation of an assessment
district for drainage and related improvements intended to miti-
gate flooding in the Amapoa/Tecorida drainage area and in those
areas impacted by that drainage.
16. Enter into an agreement with the City to defer road and drainage
improvements along the frontage of Amapoa. Post securities ac-
ceptable to the City Engineer to guarantee these improvements.
Submit a conceptual engineering design and post security for final
engineering drawings for these improvements.
17. Participate in eliminating a portion of flood hazard to the prop-
erty by posting a performance securities in the amount of $12,500
with the City to be used for a drainage improvement project for
channelizing the outflow from Atascadero Lake to Atascadero Creek.
In the event that a future assessment district is formed for area
drainage improvements that include this project, then credit in
the amount of the deposit will be applied toward final apportion-
ment of the assessment if allowed by assessment district
proceedings.
18. Submit engineering calculations, elevations, and cross-sections to
the satisfaction of the City Engineer which locate the limits and
depths of flooding on the subject property considering the effects
of potential improvements on neighboring properties.
19. This precise plan is approved for a period of one year from the
date of final approval.
! •
EXHIBIT D - Tentative Tract Map 1-87
Findings for Approval
February 2, 1987
FINDINGS •
1. The creation of these parcels conforms to the Zoning Ordinance and
the General Plan.
2. The creation of these parcels is categorically exempt from the
provisions of CEQA (Section 15301. (0)) .
3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development that
is proposed.
4. The site is physically suitable for the density of development
that is proposed.
5. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements will
not cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and
avoidably injure fish and wildlife or their habitat.
6. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvement will not
conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access
through or use of property within the proposed subdivision; or that
substantially equivalent alternate easements are provided.
7. The proposed subdivision complies with Section 6647.4. 6 of the State
Subdivision Map Act as to methods of handling and discharge of
waste.
0 0
Tentative Tract Map 1-87 (Milosevic)
EXHIBIT E - TTM 1-87
Conditions of Approval
February 2, 1987
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. The applicant shall establish Covenants , Conditions, and Restric-
tions (CC&Rs) for the regulation of land use, control of nuisances
and architectural control of all buildings .
a. These CC&Rs shall be submitted for review and approval by the
City Attorney and Community Development Department prior to
approval of the final map.
b. These CC&Rs shall be administered by a Condominium Owners
Association.
2. The open space (lot 7) shall be designated as a Public Utilities
Easement.
3. Submit a soils report or engineer' s certification that existing soils
on the site are adequate to support proposed structures per Chapter
70, subsection (e) of the Uniform Building Code.
4. A final map, incompliance with all conditions set forth herein, shall
be submitted for review and approval in accordance with the Sub-
division Map Act and the City Lot Division Ordinance prior to record-
ation.
a. Monuments shall be set at all new property corners created and
a registered civil engineer or licensed land surveyor shall
indicate, by certificate on the final map, that corners have
been set or shall be set by a date specific and that they will
be sufficient to enable the survey to be retraced.
b. A recently updated preliminary title report shall be submitted
for review in conjunction with the processing of the final map.
5. All conditions imposed on the project by Precise Plan 25-85 and build-
ing permits shall be satisfied prior to recording the final map.
6. The offer for dedication along Amapoa for sidewalk purposes (3 foot
along property frontage, 23 feet from Centerline) shall be recorded
prior to recording the final map.
7. Applicant shall pay sewer fees in effect prior to recording final
map.
EXHIBIT E - TTM 1-87
Conditions of Approval
Page Two
8. The construction of the curb, gutter, five (5) sidewalk and local
urban road section to the centerline of Amapoa shall occur prior
to filing of the map per plans on file with the City Engineer.
9. Approval of this tentative tract map shall expire two years from
the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted
pursuant to a written request prior to the expiration date.
rA T It*l AGTIDA
I-E
• _M_E_M 0 R A N D_U M_
TO City Council February 23, 1987
VIA: Michael Shelton, City Manager
FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Lot Line Adjustment 2-87
LOCATION: 4900 San Benito Road`
APPLICANT: Jon Sibbach (Alan Volbrecht)
REQUEST: Request to adjust the property line between two
existing lots of record.
On February 2, 1987, the Planning Commission considered the
above-referenced matter on its consent calendar. Upon review,
the Commission recommended approval of the lot line adjust-
ment request subject to the findings and conditions contained
• in the attached staff report.
HE:ph
cc: Jon Sibbach
Alan Volbrecht
Attachment : Planning Commission Staff Report, dtd. Feb. 2, 1987
•
r
City of Atascadero Item: A.2 •
STAFF REPORT
FOR: Planning Commission Meeting Date: Feb. 2, 1987
BY:0QSteven L. DeCamp, Senior Planner File No: LLA 2-87
Project Address: 4900 San Benito Road
SUBJECT:
Request to adjust the property line between two existing lots of
record.
A. SITUATION AND FACTS:
1. Applicant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .Jon Sibbach
2. Representative. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Alan Volbrecht
3. Site Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Parcel 1 - 1.32 acres
Parcel 2 - 0. 83 acres
4. Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .RS (Residential Suburban) •
5. Existing Use. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Parcel 1 - Single-family
dwelling and storage building
Parcel 2 - Vacant
6. Adjacent Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .North: RS
South: RS
East: RS
West: RS
7. General Plan Designation. . . . . .Suburban Single Family
8. Environmental Status. . . . . . . . . .Categorically Exempt (Class 5)
B. ANALYSIS•
The subject property is located in the RS (Residential Suburban)
zone. Minimum lot size in this zone ranges between 2.5 and 10.0
acres depending upon the "score" of the various performance stan-
dards. Both of the lots involved in this lot line adjustment are
smaller than the minimum lot size allowed by the zone.
The proposed lot line adjustment will be conditioned to result in
an equal exchange of land between the two affected lots. Becau�
of this, and the fact that the lot line adjustment is being pr
posed to eliminate the existing encroachment of a storage building
onto the adjacent lot, it is staff' s determination that the pro-
posed adjustment does not present any substantial planning issues.
Lot Line Adjustment 2-87 (Sibbach/Volbrecht)
The materials submitted with this application indicate that the
existing metal building is located approximately six(6) inches
from the rear property line of Parcel 1. The Uniform Building
Code establishes minimum construction standards for buildings
located within ten(10) feet of a property line. Included within
these standards are requirements for fire resistant construction
and elimination of openings (windows, doors, vents, etc.) in walls
located in proximity to property lines. Because of the proximity
of the existing metal building to the property line, approval of
this lot line adjustment will be conditioned upon the building
being brought into conformance with the UBC requirements for fire
walls.
The proposed map, as conditioned, complies with City policies and
standards. It should be noted that there will be no requirement
for dedication or offer of dedication as shown on the tentative
map.
C. RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of Lot Line Adjustment 2-87 based on the
Findings in Exhibit C and the Conditions of Approval in Exhibit D.
SLD:ph
ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A - Location and Zoning
Exhibit B - Tentative Lot Line Adjustment Map
Exhibit C - Findings for Approval
Exhibit D - Conditions of Approval
��i �
e� ----�,,� `_� ►-
m
-• G X 1.•4 t B l`i B
a LI-A z - 87
Wo , a
Q p Q
1% ti
•a� y 41 2 @I
Qo.3 . > '141-
al Jae
• � _ III
II
Nft7�'?' 3�1J•
o
SW O
8 ti KN� -.
All
.wnnrw �See`is'
i�
\ a
+A iat9•a
.✓sr�'1s•w
1
EXHIBIT C - Lot Line Adjustment 2-87 •
Findings for Addroval
February 2, 1987
FINDINGS:
1. The application as submitted has been determined to be categori
cally exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental
Quality Act.
2. The application as submitted conforms with all applicable zoning,
general plan and subdivision regulations of the City of Atasca-
dero.
• 0
EXHIBIT D - Lot Line Adjustment 2-87
Conditions of Approval
February 2, 1987
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. The lot line adjustment as generally shown on the map attachment
provided herein shall be submitted in final map format or re-
flected in a record of survey to be approved by the Community De-
velopment Department prior to recordation by the County Recorder 's
Office.
2. The proposed adjusted lot lines shall be surveyed and monuments
set at the new property corners prior to recordation of the final
map or record of survey.
3. The proposed lot line adjustment shall be drawn to insure an equal
exchange of property between the affected parcels.
4. The existing metal building located on Parcel 1 shall be brought
into conformance with the fire wall requirements of the Uniform
Building Code (1982 Edition) through issuance of appropriate
building permits, to the satisfaction of the Chief Building In-
spector, prior to recordation of the final map or record of
survey.
5. If a final map is to be recorded, all existing easements shall be
delineated thereon.
6. Approval of this lot line adjustment shall expire two years from
the date of approval unless a time extension has been granted pur-
suant to a written request prior to the expiration date.
• MEMO R AND U M
TO: City Council February 23, 1987
VIA: Michael Shelton, City Manager
FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Final Tract Map 28-85
LOCATION: 8935 Morro Road
APPLICANT: Ralph and Gale Day (Kennaly Engineering)
On December 9, 1985 , the City City Council approved Tentative
Tract Map 28-85, subject to certain findings and conditions
and in concurrence with the recommendation of the Planning
Commission. The required findings and conditions have been
complied with and the final tract map is recommended for ap-
proval.
HE:ph
cc: Ralph and Gale Day
Attachment: Map
r.
W
•nn�•n I
Q o .
a
I
I
Q
Zt
Cl
Ce & o
1 " t --j
, � Q
1.1
T;NG AGYNDA�
• _M_E M_0_R A N_D U M_
TO: City Council February 23 , 1987
VIA: Michael Shelton, City Manager
FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director Ute,
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Final Lot Line Adjustment 11-85
LOCATION: 4370/4390 Rosita Avenue
APPLICANT: Ed Jewell (Dan Stewart)
On September 8, 1986 , the City Council approved Lot Line Ad-
justment 11-85, subJect to certain findings and conditions and
in concurrence with the recommendation of the Planning Commis-
sion. The required findings and conditions have been complied
with and the final lot line adjustment is recommended for ap-
proval.
HE:ph
cc: Ed Jewell
Dan Stewart
Delver Costiloe
Attachment: Map
y� 2 r ' •a5 �'6� - ^
if
cc
til
� Za a_
St ock
a Cc
tZ
Ir
'IL
�Z
41
VJ
ILI
y�, � '•,.. ' �,• ' i. a 1, r t� IIS; ...
�Y r e a }►!
ti
I .._ � :' a `• I
cc
e . ,
vo. (y
• M E M O R AND U M
TO: City Council February 23, 1987
VIA: Michael Shelton, City Manager
FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Final Parcel Map 34-86
LOCATION: 8730 Coromar Road
APPLICANT: Bob Bryson (Volbrecht Surveys)
On January 26, 1987, the City Council approved Tentative Parcel
Map 34-86 , subject to certain findings and conditions and in
concurrence with the recommendation of the Planning Commission.
The required findings and conditions have been complied with
• and the final parcel map is recommended for approval.
HE:ph
cc: Bob Bryson
Volbrecht Surveys
Attachment: Map
•
mnd rw'aO i
{
4
'1 VN
jr
41 -
.� .� 0.9 :8q� �.• .�R }".Y
mmmum
..smrr .4
AJ
i
i
Y
s
�`r � ►^� / AGINDA r
•
MEMO RAND U M
TO: City Council February 23, 1987
VIA: Michael Shelton
FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director .___.
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Final Parcel Map AT 830311: 1
LOCATION: 3100/3150 Ardilla Road
APPLICANT: Gordon T. Davis (Twin Cities Engineering)
On June 23, 1986 , the City Council approved Tentative Parcel
Map AT 830311 : 1, subject to certain findings and conditions and
in concurrence with the recommendation of the Planning Commis-
sion. The required findings and conditions have been complied
with and the final parcel map is recommended for approval.
•
HE:ph
cc: Gordon T. Davis
Twin Cities Engineering
r
o
ZZ
IZ
IA
`'
Oval
J9
1
IAIDhA AGTIDA
!a EM#
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: City Council February 23, 1987
VIA: Michael Shelton, City Manager
FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Appeal by Thomas Bench of Planning Commission recom-
mendation to deny proposed subdivision of parcel
containing 3.53 acres into three lots containing 1.06
acres, 1. 23 acres, and 1.26 acres at 7503 Carmelita
BACKGROUND:
Thomas Bench has appealed the Planning Commission denial on Feb-
ruary 2, 1987, of his proposed three-way lot split (see attached
letter of appeal) . The Commission' s action was identical to an
earlier action on September 16, 1985, which denied unanimously
• (with one member stepping down) the same request (see attached
staff report dated February 2, 1987, Exhibit E) . At their Feb-
ruary 2nd hearing, the Planning Commission concurred with the
staff recommendationfor denial and accepted the five Findings
for Denial outlined as part of Exhibit I.
RECOMMENDATION•
Denial of the appeal predicated on the findings, approved by the
Planning Commission (Exhibit I) .
HE:ph
cc: Thomas Bench
Attachments: February 5, 1987, Letter of Appeal
Planning Commission Minute Excerpts, February 2,
1987
Planning Commission Staff Report, February 2, 1987
• � RECEIVED FEB 9 5 1097
cam/ �,,�,� aC�,l
,c
J.K.GEORGE
MICHAEL G.COLLINS George&Colhns
SHAUNNA L.SULLIVAN a law corporation
J.CHRISTOPHER TOE
Please reply to:
Los Osos Office
February 20, 1987
Mayor Marjorie Mackey
City of Atascadero
P.O. Box 747
Atascadero, CA 93423
Re: Mr. Thomas Bench/Proposed Subdivision
Your File NO: TPN 35-86
Project Address: 7503 Carmelita, Atascadero
Dear Mrs. Mackey:
I have been informed that on February 23, 1987 the City
Council will consider the appeal of Thomas Bench of the Planning
Commissioner' s recommendation to deny his proposed subdivision.
I wish to bring to your attention the existence of pending
litigation concerning this site and its probable effect upon the
proposed subdivsion.
This office represents Don and Judy Stanley who reside at
7505 Curbaril, Atascadero. The Stanley parcel is Assessor Parcel
Number 31-181-07, and consists of a portion of Lot 1 in Block TB
of Atascadero. The Stanley parcel abuts the Bench parcel at its
Southeasterly portion. By reference to the proposed tentative
parcel map, it abuts the proposed parcel 3, consisting of 1.06
acres.
For at least ten to fifteen years prior to this date, the
Stanleys and former owners of 7505 Curbaril have constructed and
maintained improvements at the Northwesterly border of the
Stanley property. These improvements consist of fences, gates,
landscaping, an animal shed, tool shed and a driveway. Mr. Bench
contends these improvements extend onto a portion of his
property, while the Stanleys dispute that contention. Litigation
has been commenced between Mr. and Mrs. Bench and Mr. and Mrs.
Stanley concerning the ownership of this disputed area. Even
were Mr. Bench able to prove these improvements extend onto his
694 Santa Rosa Street/P.O. Box 12710 • San Luis Obispo, California 93406 . Telephone(805) 5443351
2238 Bayview Heights Drive/P.O. Box 6129 • Los Osos, California 93412 1 Cable:SLOLAW•(805) 528-3351
George&Collins
a Law corpor&iw
Mayor Marjorie Mackey
February 20, 1987
Page Two
property, it is our belief the disputed portion of land, (shown
to be a portion of parcel 3 of the proposed tentative parcel map
35-86) has been acquired by the Stanleys through adverse
possession. Alternatively, we are seeking to quiet title against
the claims of the Benches on the basis of an acquisition of a
prescriptive easement over the property or by establishment of an
agreed boundary over the past many years. These claims are all
being litigated in the Superior Court of the State of California
for the County of San Luis Obispo in case number 61046.
I believe it would be highly inappropriate to approve the
proposed subdivision when ownership of a significant portion of
the parcel is in doubt. A judgment in the Stanleys' favor would
certainly impact the ability of Mr. Bench to utilize parcel 3 as
a building site. It should be noted that staff expressed major
concerns about creating a third building site from parcel 3, as
noted in the staff report prepared for the meeting date of
September 3, 1985 (see page 4) . Those concerns certainly must be
heightened by the facts I raise hereinabove.
In the event you have any questions whatsoever concerning
the matters I have raised in this letter I would invite you to
call me at any time. I thank you for your attention to this
matter.
Very truly yours,
GEORGE & COLLINS
Michael G. Collins
MGC:cm
cc:Don and Judy Stanley
mgc:stan2
-0 FEn u arm 2, 8 --
Y
FN rton, contractor, noted Planning Commission�appr a w rant
or t rior use at the site (dairy pr duct sales and urgeission to ke an allowance as is b�g---Yequeste Idler ' s.
hy Commission di sion regarding possa solutions ensued; Mr.
DeCamp read the definition as,per the ing Ordinance, of "Building
Materials & Hardware" and "Fur ure ome Furnishings & Equipment",
as well as "Wholesaling aryd—bis 'on" into the record.
MOTION: By Commis Rohe atchell for appro of request to interpret
the IP - o o allow businesses such as ler 's North County,
with stipulation that it is corrected t e proper zone
. , CS) through the Gen. Plan review within next 12-1
months, seconded by Commissioner Kidwell; passed un ousl
by roll-call.
S. Tentative Parcel Map 35-86:
Request submitted by Thomas Bench to allow the subdivision of one
parcel containing 3.53 acres into three (3) lots containing 1.06
acres, 1.23 acres and 1.26 acres. Subject property is located at
7503 Carmelita.
Mr. DeCamp, Senior Planner, gave staff report, recommending denial.
Commissioner Michielssen noted, for point of clarification, he had
stepped down during prior discussion on this item due to conflict of
interest; he has since sold his interest and no longer has a conflict.
Public Comment
Tom Bench, applicant, spoke in support of this request.
Virginia Powers, 7505 Carmelita, noted that most of the property in
subject area lies in the creek bed or along the steep banks; she reit-
erated Item #1 in the summation portion of staff' s report, expressing . I
the opinion that most of the residents in surrounding area agree with
said point.
Don Saueressig, 7705 Carmelita, spoke in support of findings as per
staff report, reviewing history of points raised at previous Planning
Commission and City Council hearings regarding proposed subdivisions
in subject area, which correspond to said report.
Ellen Hines, 7555 Carmelita, noted the recent purchase of her property
and construction of a home there, saying she was told there would be
no split of the subject property at time of purchase.
Rita Stanley, 7505 Curbaril, expressed agreement with findings as per
staff report.
Jim Hahn, previous owner of subject property, pointed out that there
is no recreational easement from bank to bank on subject property,
noting that an easement was provided on the opposite side of the creek
and he reviewed access points to that easement. He reviewed his ear-
• i
lier request for 3-way split, which was granted; he spoke in supot
of Mr. Bench's rights as a property owner, feeling this issue should
be decided on its technical merit and not on an emotional basis. Mr.
Hahn responded to earlier comment regarding statement, at time his lot
split was granted, to the effect that no further lot splits would be
granted, noting he doesn' t believe that was a written condition of
approval.
Don Saueressig spoke again, noting there is a considerable amount of
water which has, in rainy seasons, formed a swale on the portion of
the property which is buildable.
Richard Russell, 3584 Maricopa, who owns a parcel involved in this lot
split, noted his understanding at time of purchase (from Mr. Hahn)
that there would be no further splits from the 3 lots at that time.
Bob Powers, 7505 Carmelita, expressed 100% opposition to this propos-
al, in line with prior decision of Planning Commission.
Mr. DeCamp responded to further questions of the Commission.
MOTION: By Chairman Bond to deny TPM 35-86 based on staff' s findings,
seconded by Commissioner Hatchell; passed unanimously by
roll-call.
Tentative Parcel Ma 38-86
equest submitted by Gary Schmidt (Kenneth Wilson) to alio th
s division of two parcels containing 1.83 acres into t ee lot
cont 'ning-0.58, 0.61 and 0.64 acres. Subject propert s locat
ed at 10 Atascadero Avenue.
Mr. DeCamp, Seni Planner, gave staff report.
Public Comment
John Falkenstein, Cu E 'veering, red esenting Mr. Wilson and Mr
Schmidt, offered to respond t questio from Commission.
Discussion ensued regarding lot 'guration created by this propose
subdivision. \
MOTION: By Commissioner lan to approve 38-86 subject to the 2
conditions 1.i ed in the staff., re rt, seconded by Commis
sioner Cope1-an; passed unanimously:
7. Tentative Tract Map 39-86 :
Request submitted by Norm Norton (Cuesta Engineering) t allow the
creation of ten (10) air-space condominium units with com a a
on a .94 acre site. Subject property is located at 9359 M
man.
\\J
• •
i -
City of Atascadero Item: B.5
STAFF REPORT
FOR: Planning Commission Meeting Date: February 2, 1987
BY:WSteven L. DeCamp, Senior Planner File No: TPM 35-86
Project Address: 7503 Carmelita
SUBJECT:
Subdivision of one parcel containing 3. 53 acres into three (3) lots
containing 1.06 acres, 1.23 acres, and 1.26 acres.
BACKGROUND:
Subdivision activity on the subject property has a long history (see
Exhibit F for a detailed account) . The most recent subdivision appli-
cation was filed in 1985. That application, which is identical to the
current proposal, was denied by the Planning Commission and City
Council as required by the Subdivision Map Act' s provisions regarding
required findings (see Exhibit E) .
Notice of public hearing was published in the Atascadero News on Fri-
day, January 23, 1987. All property owners of record located within
300 feet of the subject property were also notified on that date.
A. SITUATION AND FACTS:
1. Applicant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Thomas Bench
2. Representative. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Thomas Bench
3. Site Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3. 53 acres
4. Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .LS (FH) - Special Recreation
with Flood Hazard overlay.
5. Existing Use. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Parcel 1 contains a single
family residence. Parcels 2
and 3 are vacant.
6. Adjacent Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .North: LS (FH)
South: LS (FH)
East: LSF-Y
West: LSF-Y
TPM 35-86 - Staff Report j
7503 Carmelita (Thomas Bench)
Page Two
7. General Plan Designation. . . . . .Moderate Density Single Family
8. Environmental Status. . . . . . . . . .Negative Declaration previously
considered.
B. ANALYSIS:
The application before the Commission proposes the subdivision of
one parcel containing 3.53 acres into three parcels containing
1.06 acres, 1.23 acres, and 1.26 acres. The property proposed for
subdivision is located in a Special Recreation zoning district
with a Flood Hazard Overlay. The minimum lot size in this zone
for parcels intended for single family residential use is one (1)
acre where sewers are available and one and one half (1.5) acres
where sewers are not available. The subject property is located
within a sewered area and all development proposed would, if ap-
proved, be required to connect to the sewer line. 0
Reasonable expectations for development of the subject property
are constrained by its location in, and adjacent to, Atascadero
Creek (see Exhibit C) . Approval of Parcel Map AT 23-83 (see
Exhibit D) was conditioned upon creation of an open space easement
along Atascadero Creek and upon delineation of the 100 year flood
plain of the creek. Combined, these two areas of special concern
eliminate most, if not all, opportunities for development on the
two new lots being proposed. Indeed, the proposed lot most
heavily impacted by creek related constraints is shown as the
smallest of the proposed lots.
Access to the proposed lots (Parcels 2 and 3) is a significant
concern. As can be seen on the tentative parcel map, access to
proposed Parcel 2 is from an existing easement. Access to Parcel
3 is not detailed. The portion of Curbaril Avenue which abuts
Parcel 3 has not been constructed. Extension of this road to City
standards would entail significant expense and engineering dif-
ficulty due to the required creek crosing. A private crossing to
Serve Parcel 3 at this location would be unacceptable due to its
potential impact on flooding. In addition, the effect on the open
space easement and use of the creek-way as a recreational asset
would be detrimental. Extension of the existing easement to serve
Parcel 3 could only be accomplished by extensive grading and con-
sequent loss of significant amounts of riparian vegetation. Suc
an extension would also severly impact whatever development alte
natives may exist for Parcel 2.
r,...
0 •
TPM 35-86 - Staff Report
7503 Carmelita (Thomas Bench)
Page Three
The General Plan contains policies regarding the use of various
recreational resources. On page 83, the plan states "Areas of
open space available for recreation that shall be preserved are
listed below: The banks and bed of Atascadero Creek. . . ." Other
relevant General Plan policies dealing with the preservation of
Atascadero Creek are included in Exhibit H. These policies sug-
gest that existing levels of development in the subject area of
Atascadero Creek should not be exceeded.
The stated purpose of the LS (Special Recreation) zone in the Zon-
ing Ordinance is:
119-3.411. Purpose: This zone is established to provide
suitable locations and standards for the development of recrea-
tional facilities on land in private ownership. This zone also
provides for residential and agricultural uses where intensive
recreational activity may not be appropriate. "
This zone limits single family residential use to that which will
not conflict with recreational use. A large portion of the prop-
erty proposed for subdivision has been reserved, through an ease-
ment, for such recreational use. Given the intent of the prior
subdivision approval to restrict future splits, the imposition of
the open space easement, and the stated purpose of the LS zone,
additional residential development appears to be inappropriate
under the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance.
SUMMATION•
The following points are of particular importance in the review of
Tentative Parcel Map 35-86.
1. Approval of the initial subdivision of the property along
Atascadero Creek , of which the subject parcel was a part, was
predicated on a Planning Commission determination that no
further lot splits would occur. The proposed subdivision
currently before the Commission would not be consistent with
that prior approval.
i 0
TPM 35-86 - Staff Report
7503 Carmelita (Thomas Bench)
Page Four
2. Access to proposed Parcel 3 is inadequate.
3. Further development in the subject area of Atascadero Creek
is inconsistent with the adopted General Plan and the intent
of the Zoning Ordinance.
4. Section 66474 of the Subdivision Map Act requires that a
tentative subdivision map be denied if any one or more of
seven findings are made. As indicated in Exhibit I, five of
these findings should be made relative to this proposal.
5. On September 3, 1985, the Planning Commission denied an ap-
plication to subdivide the subject property ina manner iden-
tical to the current proposal (See Exhibit G) . At that time,
the Planning Commission made the findings shown in Exhibit E.
No portion of the current proposal has been modified to miti-
gate the adverse findings previously made.
C. RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends denial of Tentative Parcel Map 35-86 based on
the Findings for Denial contained in Exhibit I.
SD:ph
ATTACHMENTS : Exhibit A - Location and Zoning Map
Exhibit B - Tentative Parcel Map 35-86
Exhibit C - Development Constraints
Exhibit D - Final Parcel Map AT 82-83
Exhibit E - Planning Commission Resolution
V-85 re: TPM 24-85
Exhibit F - Staff Report re: TPM 24-85
Exhibit G - Planning Commission Minutes
(9/3/85) re: TPM 24-85
Exhibit H - General Plan Creek Policies
Exhibit I - Findings for Denial
r
:JIM--
;
�►1�.= _ _, :�.I I,,` II�i�� •�• � moi...
t1
� ■. � _t SII. . . . �� . �� :� .,*�,, � � ,_
Us
Ilion
MAT of 4
��• . / �� I ♦ ♦ I` fir►
� PMP� �►''�► •� �.
�♦qtr I `moi �'► ,�,�
� iii .- . a�..•�
./ ` @ . fir_. � • �'I \
� i - 1 .
7�1-"+ POL M a
—[ PM 3 S— $lo
4
IL
All
ic
1
h
egotz
17)
tcCNJ
Aj
1
. � • ., E,xI�� BIT G
TPM 3 5- 8(p
LL
dO
OC
69 •1 •
1 . 1 1 1 1 1 1 • � 1 9 a 1 1
J $ Q
A7 8Z
-04
,i Mks'
`u
ev., t � •a � 1R
6op!(N'i : W a Q �i • 8y a
NIs•JS•�-N �
p ! 111 '� h� i/ W ; tix
��wlRe% Ana
IK Cot
4:
Apo* i
°
•� —/� roil q / •!` X10 0 0 �� �b1^ q��
J ICgyµ.It,q�CCN Aa, i/ t a1 V SW '�•�
Ctn �[\
N O[sdt t,t5 ! g r .
►O 91�rN • /d'(y'.9SN. ~ �a 'h J� ' e�W q
n rr.r,�r aN �. ago; 41 W
Q—v•�.iYN
�� �• 7 �. /yam � 4 - • �� . ,•I
N Q� j Il�� QO • R�` V , `.: he (tj �i ' tt (O• 4r�
t� .tiID PIZI
e
lk
41
• _t.
0.0
\ at
� .. • W h W W W j!.
2 h ? 2 = 2 2 2 Ir k
_YYi 4tt, h ' w e t W
" : a h • t W
� : $
a s �-t- = ft w a m � � W
C9
1 rN` zS `\�F � ii - - i V N�M��,9:.►lM n 1gy e i ��' 1
00—L A .O '/{oe�4
.CCM I •Qf R
p
t � cry . �G �- � 7�0 ,I✓ 7R{ ��W�- �
IoWkt►t .KNE W �.i r ter$ Q r i s c f R
'n .I0Nl6 •'8 W \4 W�W F
it•
� I ( •�( 4 vii 7 ^ N Y o
N y`O qOZ — W tv� 'sG • 4��i l C3
O O � • ~ to �(\I Z � ! a�i^`� J �♦J � w v�v\ R p � � n
14 1
•� M
M.b. ►.9SN • ``\tilt = Wv�iiS a ge yg,� �t„bvoti iy' p
Rd3ol�f�o� o� �lahhi�.g
Cok1mt51ioh rd : TFM 29- 85
TpM 3S -S(v
RESOLUTION 140. 7-85
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF ATASCADERO DENYING TENTATIVE PARCEL
MAP 24-85 (7503 CARMELITA: BENCH/KENNALY ENGINEERING)
WHEREAS, the Atascadero Planning Commission conducted a public
hearing on September 3, 1985; and
WHEREAS, at that meeting, after considerable discussion, it was
decided that past intent of staff and City was not to allow further
lot splits in this area; and
WHEREAS, when the specific site information was examined, it was
determined that: a) the 100 year flooding does not allow for suffi-
cient usable building area on the lots proposed; b) the establishment
of residences in the area would impede public access to and recrea-
tional use of the creek; and c) the future construction of a bridge
across Atascadero Creek at Curbaril would obstruct access to one of
the proposed parcels.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that the Atascadero Planning Com-
mission does hereby deny Tentative Parcel Map 18-85 as follows:
Section 1. Commission Findings.
1. The creation of these parcels is not consistent with the Gen-
eral Plan.
2. The creation of these parcels could have a significant ad-
verse effect upon the environment.
3. The site is not physically suitable for the type of develop-
ment proposed.
4. The site is not physically suitable for the proposed density
of development.
5. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements
is likely to cause substantial environmental damage or sub-
stantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their
habitat. -
6. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvement will
conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large for
access through or use of, property within the proposed subdi-
vision, and substantially equivalent alternate easements are
not provided.
Section 2. Commission Action.
1. To deny proposed Tentative Parcel Map 24-85.
On motion by Commissioner BOND and seconded by Commis
sioner MICHIELSSEN , the foregoing resolution is adopted in its en-
tirety by" the following roll call vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS BOND, -- SANDERS, HATCHELL,
NOLAN, KENNEDY AND CHAIRMAN LAPRADE
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: COPUIISSIONER MICHIELSSEN
DATE ADOPTED: SEPTEMBER 16, 1985
AYNE ZAPRADE, Chairman
ATTEST:
AHE RY EN EN
Communit Dev opment Director
�► � Exp�r�1-� �
Tens z4
City of Atascadero TPM 35`86,
STAFF REPORT ,
FOR: Planning Commission Meeting Date: 9/3/85
BY: Doug Davidson, Assistant Planner File No: TPM 24-85
Project Address: 7503 Carmelita
SUBJECT:
To allow the division of a 3.53 acre parcel into three lots of 1.06,
1.23, and 1.26 acres each.
BACKGROUND:
A notice of public hearing was published in the Atascadero News on
August 23, 1985 and all owners of record property within 300 feet of
the subject site were notified on that date.
This proposal has quite a long history. In 1963, the original owner
(Finch) of creek lots 5, 6, 7, and 8 (see Exhibit D) began deeding the
lots off minus a 60 foot wide strip of land at the rear of the lots
which follows the Creek Reservation boundary, and a 60 foot wide strip
along the northeast edge of Lot 4 from Carmelita Avenue leading to the
creek. A potential buyer of Lot 5 made an inquiry to the County re-
garding the legality of the easement and lot lines. The County deter-
mined an illegal situation existed and notified the owner of his es-
tablishment of lot lines without required maps. The owners subse-
quently recorded an irrevocable offer of dedication to the County for
roadway purposes for these 60 foot strips n 1966. This action miti-
gated the situation at the time and the County stopped violation pro-
ceedings. In 1978, the owner (Medley) of Creek Reservation No. 6 and
the dedicated 60 foot strips applied to the County for permits to
develop in the dedicated ar.ea, but these permits were denied due to
the offer of dedication. The house, on proposed Parcel 3 (of the 1982
parcel map) was then constructed in the Creek Reservation portion of
the property. This parcel map was applied for in June, 1982 by Jim
Haun.
At that time, Mr. Haun proposed to combine Creek Reservation No. 6
with the 60 foot wide strip along the northeast property line of Lot 5
and resubdivide said land into four parcels of 3.44, 1.92, 1. 57 and
1.50 acres each. This project also required the applicant to vacate
an irrevocable offer of dedication for road purposes to the City for
the above-mentioned 60 foot wide strips of land. It was the appli-
cant' s intention to utilize the Creek Reservation areas to fulfill
minimum lot size requirements and the 60 foot strips to provide the
area for actual building sites. The following issues were raised at
the hearing:
1) General Plan policy on creek reservations
2) Recreational easement/dedication/improvements
3) Possible cul-de-sac, future splits on Lots 5 and 6, improvement
participation
4) Access to Parcel 1 and staking
5) 100-year flood levels and buildable sites
6) Sewage pumps for individual lots
7) Fire hydrant requirements
8) Abandonment of easement
The matter was continued at that time until General Plan Amendment
821206:1 concerning creek setbacks was complete. General Plan poli-
cies at that time specifically required a 50 foot setback for all
structures from the bank of the creek or river. . If this was applied
in this particular case, there would be no buildable sites available.
This General Plan amendment deleted this strict 50 foot setback while
still insuring the uninterrupted natural flow of streams, as well as
access to and recreational use of the creeks.
Another issue was the abandonment of the road which involved a sepa-
rate staff report and hearing process. To summarize, it was deter-
mined by the city attorney that a road abandonment was not necessary
for the offer of dedication since the offer was never accepted by the
County or City. This did leave the property in violation of the Sub-
division Map Act, but the subsequent approved and recorded map re-
solved the situation.
As stated previously, this earlier proposal requested the division of
an 8.43 acre parcel into four parcels of 3.44, 1.92, 1. 57 and 1.50
acres. Due to site conditions and the limited buildable area, the
approval was granted on the condition of reversing the number of lots
from four to three. This resulted in a parcel map of 3.53, 2.34, and
2.63 acres (see Exhibit D) . The intent of this approval was that
there be no further lot splits on this property. This current request
is to divide the 3.53 acre parcel into three lots of 1.06, 1. 23, and
1. 26 acres each.
A. LOCATION: 7503 Carmelita (Lot 5 of Block UB)
B. SITUATION AND FACTS:
1. Request. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .To allow the division of 3.53
acres into three lots of 1.06,
1. 23, and 1.26 acres each
2. Applicant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Thomas Bench
3. Engineer. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Kennaly Engineering
4. Site Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3. 53 acres
2
5. Streets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Carmelita is a City-maintained
street with a 40 foot wide right
of-way. Parcels 1 and 2 are
reached by a private road and
utility easement off Carmelita.
6. Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .LS (FH) special recreation, flood
hazard
7. Existing Use. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Single family residence on pro-
posed parcel 1. Parcels 2 and 3
are vacant.
8. Adjacent Zoning and Use. . . . . .North: LSF-Y, residential
South: SL(FH) , Atascadero Creek
East: SL(FH) , Atascadero Creek
West: LSF-Y, residential
9. General Plan Designation. . . . .Moderate Density Single Family
Residential
10. Terrain. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Level to steeply sloping con-
taining mature trees character-
istic of the creek area
11. Environmental Status. . . . . . . . .Negative Declaration
C. ANALYSIS:
The zoning on this property is LS (FH) (Special Recreation, Flood
Hazard overlay) . This zone is established to provide suitable
locations and standards for the development of recreational facil-
ities on land in private ownership. This zone also provides for
residential and agricultural uses where intensive recreational
activity may not be appropriate. There is no minimum lot size in
the Special Recreation zone, except for parcels intended for
single family residential use, where the minimum lot size is one
acre when sewers are available and one and one-half acres when
sewers are not available. Sewers are available in the area.
Development of Site:
Precise plan approval is required for grading on slopes over 20%.
This proposal does not appear to require such action, although the
Flood Hazard overlay involves standards which attempt to minimize
the effects of development on drainage ways and watercourses. A
soils report and engineered foundation will be required to assure
adequate soil stability and minimum soil erosion affecting struc-
tural integrity of any buildings due to stream action along the
creek. A drainage plan, inlcuding the 100-year flood line, will
need Community Development and Public Works Departments' approval
to show that the proposed structures are designed to be flood-free
or be able to withstand partial inundation, and that proposed uses
will not subject occupants to undue risks of flooding: The build-
able area of parcel 2 must be shown to be above the 100-year
3
floodway. If that fact is shown, site checks have verified that
this is a suitable building site.
Staff has major concerns about creating a third building site
(Parcel 3) . Three important considerations preclude this from be-
coming a viable building site and separate parcel:
1) The 100-year floodway does not allow for a feasible buildable
area.
2) The establishment of a residence in this area would impede
public access to and recreational use of the creek.
3) The future construction of a bridge across Atascadero Creek
Creek at Curbaril would obstruct access to Parcel 3 due to
the two feet freeboard approach guardrails needed for bridge
improvements.
In sum, staff cannot support a three-way lot split in this area.
It was the intent of the City in 1982 to allow no further parcel-
ing after the 3.53, 2.34, and 2.62 acre lots were created. Find-
ings can be made to support another parcel, but the creek align-
ment and policies associated with it would permit the creation of
Parcel 3.
D. RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of Tentative Parcel Map 24-85 based on
the findings and conditions of approval contained in Exhibit A.
DGD:ps
ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A - Findings/Conditions of Approval
Exhibit B - Location Map
Exhibit C - Parcel Map
Exhibit D - Parcel Map AT 820504:1 (Haun)
Exhibit E - Staff Report - AT 820504:1 (Haun) -
Exhibit F - General Plan Creek Policies
4
�n
0 * cxN �r�i►
Minutes - Planning Commission - September 3, 1985 PIS"n�h9 GoMw►. /�I�Hv-F'�5
--- ---- TPM 3 s-8�
4. Tentative Parcel Map 24-85 :
Request submitted by Thomas Bench (Kennaly Engineering) to
allow the division of 3. 53 acres into three lots of 1. 06,
1. 23, and 1. 26 acres each. 'Subject property is located at
7503 Carmelita, also known as Lot 5 of Block UB.
Commissioner Michielssen stepped down due to a possible conflict
. of interest. -
In presenting the staff report, Mr . David.son briefly 'summarized
the background on the history of this property which dates back to
Minutes - Planning Commission - September 3, 1985
1963 and spoke briefly on eight issues pertinent to a prior lands
division on the property.
Thomas Bench, applicant, stated that the purpose for requesting - a
lot split was to create an additional lot for his daughter to
build a home on and explained the difficulties he is encountering
with a portion of proposed Lot 3 involving adjacent property
owners who are using a portion of his property. He indicated a
desire give a portion of that lot to the City if the problem can
be resolved.
Judy Stanley, 7505 Curbaril, stated she has prescriptive easement
rights on a parcel that Mr . Bench owns, and noted the area is
buildable because there is inadequate land and would disrupt the
creek and its beauty.
Don Saueressig, 7705 Carmelita, explained his efforts in opposing
the prior lot split for the property and noted that there is a
drainage swale on proposed Parcel 2 and spoke about a ' creek bank
which has fallen away about 7 to 10 feet. He further stated that
the lot split is not consistent with the neighborhood and there is
not a suitable building site for the parcels.
Bob Powers, 7505 Carmelita, asked how parcel 2' s access would be
reached and spoke about his concern over an access easement that
he is not able to use but is paying taxes for. Mr. Engen respon-
ded that, in speaking with the Public Works Department, he was le
told there are no limitations on the use of the easement in terms
of access to properties and stated that more research may be
needed, if there were information to the contrary.
Lorraine Russell, property owner on Carmelita, asked how the ap-
plicant would gain access to his property and explained her Parti-
cipation with regard to the 60 foot easement and expressed her
concern with any future lot splits on the property. Mr . Engen
explained that the Public Works Department had determined that
the easement which would lead to parcel 2 is a valid easement to
serve the property.
Chairman LaPrade noted that the easement was granted to the prop-
erty and not to an individual.
Richard Russell, property owner on Carmelita, added that he owns
the 60 foot easement plus the lot below it and stated that he
would request a similar lot split if this particular lot split is
granted.
Dorothy Bennett, 7450 Carmelita, 'stated her driveway is directly
across the street from the access road that goes to Mr . Bench' s
property and expressed her opposition to the project. She noted
that any additional building on this back lot would be out of
character with the neighborhood and stated that there is already a
heavy amount of dust created from the access road and pointed outle
that more traffic would be generated if additional lot splits are
allowed.
Minutes - Planning Commission - September 3, 1985
Mr. Saueressig stated that he has studied the easements noting the
words are very specific in their meaning, but that may be a matter
for an attorney to research. He stated that if the split is al-
lowed, the legal description and legal easement will change. Mr .
Saueressig further stated that it was his understanding that if
more than four homes are served by one driveway, that driveway
would be required to be paved. Mr. Davidson replied that up to
four homes can be served without paving.
Norma Davis, 7400 Carmelita, expressed her concern with the road
and felt that if a lot split is approved, the road should be re-
quired to be paved.
Bonnie Lowe, Tom Bench' s daughter, clarified that there would be
no additional lot splits on the property in which to serve more
homes and explained who would be using the 30 foot easement. She
also pointed out that the creek reservation area is private
property.
Chairman LaPrade stated that this is a unique piece of property
and is one of the few parcels that is privately owned with regard
to the creek reservation. He spoke about the prior Planning Com-
mission' s action regarding the division of the three original par-
cels and felt that this prior decision should be upheld to keep
the parcels as they are and not allow any more splits on the
property.
Commissioner Kennedy felt that a substantial amount of the proper-
ty is in the creek area and there is small amount of land avail-
able for a building site, and concurred with Chairman LaPrade' s
comments. She also noted concern with the amount of underground
utilities that would be required on that easement.
Commissioner Bond concurred with Chairman LaPrade' s comments that
the Planning Commission could not justify any additional lot
splits for the property.
MOTION: Made by Commissioner Bond, seconded by Commissioner
Kennedy and carried unanimously to deny Tentative Parcel
24-85.
Mr. Engen noted that a resolution reflecting findings for denial
would be prepared for consideration at the next meeting.
Chairman LaPrade noted that the applicant does have the right to
appeal the decision to the City Council.
Commissioner Michielssen returned to the Commission.
. � 0x P 15)-r 14
4. P. G raa,k. Po I c a,-;r
TPM 35- 8�
Areas of open space available for recreation that shall be
preserved are listed below:
The banks and bed of Atascadero Creek.
The inundation area of the Salinas River
Atascadero Lake and its surrounding park
The Sunken Gardens
Chalk Mountain Regional Park
The three Little League baseball fields
The banks and bed of Graves Creek
Pine Mountain (in part)
The Wranglerette Arena
Areas of open space that shall be considered for acquisition
by a public agency and/or preserved for recreation are listed
below:
Chandler Parkland
Pine Mountain Amphitheater
County-owned lots fronting on Lakeview adjacent to
Atascadero Lake
Both categories are shown in Table VI-4 . The Creek Reserves ,
actual and potential, are shown on Map VI-4 .
Atascadero Creek bisects the Colony on a west to east line,
running along the southern portion of the Central Business
District and the administrative-civic center complex.
Portions of the Creek Reserve already are in public owner-
ship. Natural vegetation and scenic quality are abundant
along both creeks.
Creek Policy Proposals
1. Possible purchase of privately owned portions, or
negotiation of easement rights, shall be considered in
order to develop the whole area as recreational land.
These actions can be financed through public subscrip-
tion, general obligation bonds, revenue-sharing funds
or operating surplus.
2. Building set-back requirements shall be established
along the banks of both creeks to insure the uninter-
upted natural flow of the streams and ensure access
to and recreational use of the creeks.
3. The bacteriological content of the water in both creeks
shall be monitored at appropriate intervals_, to insure
against contamination by inflow of effluent from nearby
septic tank leach-lines. This possibility may exist
along Atascadero Creek from the Capistrano Avenue Bridge
._..� to the rail--,ad ove--pass .
•
4. Land disturbance shall be minimized within at least
50 feet of water courses, except for that maintenance
such as brush clearing which shall protect adjacent
properties from flood hazards. Other minor exceptions
could be made for harvesting sand and gravel and for
low-intensity recreational uses, such as trails and pic
nic areas. Channelization of creeks with concrete
shall be prohibited.
5. Some areas of the creeks shall be left in their natural
state for public enjoyment and to provide a continuing
home for the beaver population, as well as the foxes,
weasels, coyotes, wildcats and raccoons.
6. Facilities for picnics, playgrounds and riding, biking
and hiking trails are appropriate to these watercourse
areas. Multiple-use trails for hiking and riding shall
be developed the length of the creeks.
7. A series of check dams on the upper portions of Atas-
cadero Creek could provide yeas-round water (see
Chapter VII, SERVICES) for fishing and swimming acti-
vities. However, the alteration of natural drainage
patterns shall be minimized, and the existing minor
drainage channels shall be left in open space, in most
cases, to provide for runoff.
8. The Atascadero Creek Plan, as prepared by SEDES and
approved as amended by the Board of Supervisors (1975) ,
is an integral part of this General Plan and represents
a potential horizon plan for the subject area. The Creek
Plan is shown on Map VI-2.
9. That portion of the Atascadero Creek Reserve from El
Camino Real Bridge to the proposed Lewis Avenue Bridge
shall be developed into a park.
• i
EXHIBIT I - Tentative Parcel Map 35-86
Findings for Denial
February 2, 1987
FINDINGS:
1. That the proposed map is not consistent with applicable general
and specific plans as specified in Section 65451.
2. That the design and improvements of the proposed subdivision is
not consistent with applicable general and specific plans.
3. That the site is not physically suitable for the type of develop-
ment proposed.
4. That the site is not physically suitable for the proposed density
of development.
5. 1. That the design of the subdivision and the type of improvements
will conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, f
access through or use of, property within the proposed
subdivision. Substantially equivalent alternate easements are not
provided.
`s
1
• 1 fETJNQ7 AG"yDA
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: City Council February 23, 1987
VIA: Michael Shelton, City Manager
FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: General Plan Amendment 1D-87 and Zone Change 20-86
LOCATION: Del Rio at E1 Camino Real
APPLICANT: Ilene M. Cropper (Twin Cities Engineering) , Williams
House of Carpets, Ron Idler (Bob Lilley)
REQUEST: To revise the existing General Plan Land Use Element
Text and Map to expand the Urban Services Area and
Land Use Designation to allow for a change in the
existing CN (Commercial Neighborhood) zoning to CR
(Commercial Retail)
BACKGROUND:
The Planning Commission considered two applications as part of
this overall request in proximity to Del Rio Road and E1 Camino
Real. Action of the Commission was to recommend denial of the
General Plan Amendment to revise the Urban Services Line and to
deny the zoning . change request from CN(Neighborhood Commercial)
to CR(Retail Commercial) for Williams House of Carpets (see at-
tached staff report) . With respect to the latter, the Commission
initiated changes to the text of the Zoning Ordinance which would
allow carpet sales, as a conditional use, in the CN Zone.
ANALYSIS-
The Planning Commission felt that extension of the Urban Services
Line at this time would be premature. The practical affect on
the Cropper application is to limit lot splits based upon the
following General Plan language: "Properties outside the Urban
Services Line shall be evaluated for lot sizes based on Suburban
Residential range (2 1/2 to 10 acres) until sewers are available"
(p. 57) .
•
GPA 1D-87/ZC 20-86
Del Rio at El Camino Real
Page Two
RECOMMENDATION:
Deny the General Plan and zoning request subject to the findings
contained in the February 2, 1987 staff report (Exhibit J) .
HE:ph
cc: Ilene Cropper
Twin Cities Engineering
Ron Idler
Bob Lilley
Attachments: Planning Commission Minutes Excerpt, Feb. 2, 1987
Planning Commission Staff Report, Feb. 2, 1987
•
•
F
gen summarized the scope and purpose of the A earance Revi
.sion ensued relating to the question of whether or not ppear
review would apply to single-family dwellings. Mr. E en noted
clusion of language within the guidelines that would llow th'ity Development Director, at his discretion, to 11 (for rea FR project which may have a scenic impact from in arterial
(i.e. , Hwy 101 & 41) , expressing he feels such occ ions will b
rare. /
MOTION: By Co issioner Michielssen recommendingthat Council adop
the Mearance Review Manual, as amended, and that no fee
for appeals be charged onprojects dining the first year o
implementalt,i,on of the guidelines.. seconded by Commissioner
Copelan; pas.,.., d unanimously.
2. General Plan Amendment C- 7 and Zone Change 27-86:
Request initiated by Pe erson Development Company (Stephen Deven-
cenzi) to revise the ex' s 'ng General Plan from Moderate Densit
Single Family to High De _�y Single Family and coinciding Zon
Change from RSF-Y (1/acre w:�ik sewer 1-1/2 acre without sewer min
imum lot size) to R F-X (1/2 aore minimum lot size) .
Mr. Moses, Assoc. Pla4er,t 4/ave staff port, recommending LSF-X (Lim-
ited Single-Family Residential) zoning, nd he responded to question.
from the Commission.
Public Comment
Steve Devencenzi, representing Peterson Development Co. , expresse
frustration /wi the length of time which has el psed on this issu
(noting it ;tia,Pbeen 9 months since it was last befor the Commission)
adding, however, the applicant has no opposition to st ff recommenda-
tions. /was
Concernexpressed over the impact of the LSF-X zone on
o
a person with farm animals. Staff indicated no horses were seen o
field investigation.
OTION: By Commissioner Copelan that Planning Commission accept GP
1C-87 & ZC 27-86 as presented, seconded by Commissioner H
chell; passed unanimously.
3. General Plan Amendment 1D-87 and Zone Change 20-86:
Williams House of Carpets, Ron Idler (Bob Lilley) and as expanded
by the City of Atascadero. To revise the existing General Plan
Land Use Element Text and Map to expand the Urban Services Area
and Land Use designation to allow for a change in the existing CN
Commercial Neighborhood) zoning to CR (Commercial Retail)
• 0
Mr. Moses, Assoc. Planner, gave staff report, recommending denial,id
he responded to questions from the Commission.
Public Comment
Robert Lilley, representing Williams House of Carpets, spoke in sup-
port of this request; he noted initially the applicant applied for a
zone change after acquiring an option to purchase subject property to
construct a retail carpet distributorship & retail commercial store.
After two separate zoning interpretations from staff, it was decided
that a Gen. Plan amendment would be required, as well.
Tom Vaughan, Twin Cities Engineering, representing Mrs. Cropper (who
owns a portion of Lot 7) , expressed the reason for request to expand
the Urban Services Line was that she was approached by a potential
purchaser of a portion of her property, and in order to split that
portion off for a future commercial development, the line would have
to be extended to include subject property.
Lengthy discussion by Commission ensued regarding uses on subject and
surrounding properties, as well as alternatives available to the Com-
mission.
MOTION: By Commissioner Copelan to deny GPA 1D-87 & ZC 20-86,
recommend staff prepare an amendment to the Zoning Ordinar�.L'e
which would allow furniture, fixtures & equipment stores
within the CN zone under C.U.P. Motion seconded by Commis-
sioner Michielssen; passed unanimously by roll-call.
COMMISSION RECESSED FOR A BREAK AT 9:10 P.M. MEETING CALLED BACK TO
ORDER AT 9 :30 P.M.
4. _'Zonin\terpretation 1-87:
Request by Idler ' s North County (Donald D. Idler) for Planning
Commission interpretation regarding use types owed in Indus-
trial Park-"2one districts.
Mr. DeCamp, Senior Plannex ave staff reand responded to ques-
tions from the Commission.
Public Comment
Don Idler, Idler 's Ap nces, spoke in suppprt of this request for
interpretation, n g he is anxious to expedisecuring his business
license as so as possible. He opposes the requi-rement to initiate a
zoning to change as his responsibility, feeling the 'ority of his
space is for a "proper incidental" use (noting the, prio use of ice
c sales was considered an "incidental" use to the�'primary nu
uring use and was, therefore, allowed and business license grante
City of Atascadero Item: B-
3
STAFF REPORT
FOR: Planning Commission Meeting Date: February 2, 1987
BY: Joel Moses, Associate Planner File No: GP 1D-87
ZC 20-86
Project Address: Del Rio at E1 Camino Real
SUBJECT:
General Plan Amendment GP 1D-87 and Zone Change ZC 20-86 initiated by
Ilene M. Cropper (TwinCities Engineering) , Williams House of Carpets,
Ron Idler (Bob Lilley) and as expanded by the City of Atascadero. To
revise the existing General Plan Land Use Element Text and Map to ex-
pand the Urban Services Area and Land Use designation to allow for a
change in the existing CN (Commercial Neighborhood) zoning to CR (Com-
mercial Retail)
BACKGROUND:
Zone Change ZC 20-86 was initiated by Williams House of Carpets (Ron
Idler/Bob Lilley) in July 1986. The application went through several
modifications as to requested rezoning on a single site at 2055 El
Camino Real, containing 1.9 acres of vacant land. General Plan Amend-
ment GP 1D-87 was initiated by Ilene Cropper (Twin Cities Engineering)
in September 1986 to extend the Urban Services Line to include prop-
erty presently zoned CN (Commercial Neighborhood) east of E1 Camino
Real on both sides of Del Rio Road. The application also covered
property owned by people other than Ms. Cropper. During its prelim-
inary review of the General Plan Amendments, the City expanded the
General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to cover General Plan Text and
map for the present Commercial Area on the East side of E1 Camino Real
at Del Rio Road.
Public hearing notice was published in the Atascadero News on January
23, 1987, and copies were sent to all record property owners within
300 feet of the subject site.
A. LOCATION:
East side of El Camino Real on both sides of Del Rio Road - (Lots
7 and 7A, Blk 22 and portions of Lots 31 and 32 of Blk 49, Atasca-
dero Colony) .
0 0
Staff Report - February 2, 1987
GP 1D-87/ZC 20-86
Page Two
B. SITUATION AND FACTS;
1. Request. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .To revise the existing General
Plan Land Use Element text and
map to expand the Urban Ser-
vices line and revise the Land
Use designation to allow for a
change in the existing zoning
from CN (Commercial Neighbor-
hood) to CR (Commercial Retail)
2. Applicant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Ilene M. Cropper (Twin Cities
Engineering) , Williams House of
Carpets, Ron Idler (Bob Lilley)
3. Site Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Approximately 10 acres
4. Streets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .El Camino Real - Arterial Un
divided.
Del Rio Road - Arterial Undi-
vided.
5. Zoning. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CN (Commercial Neighborhood)
6. Existing Use. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..Residential/Vacant/Commercial
7. Adjacent Zoning and Use. . . . . . .North: RS (Residential Subur-
ban) -Residential
South: RS (Residential Subur-
ban) -Residential
East: RS (Residential Subur-
ban) -Residential
West: : CN(Commercial Neigh-
borhood) - Bar/Service
station vacant
8. General Plan Designation. . . . . .Retail Commercial (Neighbor-
hood)
9. Terrain. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . o . . . o . .Level, partially developed
with residential development
and commercial.
10. Environmental Status. . . . . . . . . —Negative Declaration
Staff Report - February 2, 1987 .
GP LD-87/ZC 20-86
Page Three
C. ANALYSIS•
In reviewing the proposed revision, many possibilities occur due
to the nature of the requests. A combined application makes for a
larger review of the proposal' s impact and existing policy con-
cerning the area. One applicant has requested only an expansion
of the Urban Services Area (Cropper/Twin Cities Engineering) so
that lots may be split. The second applicant is requesting a re-
vision to the zoning to allow for the development of a use not now
permitted by the existing zoning (Idler/Lilley) . The City, during
its preliminary review as noted, expanded the area and the ap-
plications. The expansion was to cover the expansion of the Urban
Services Area to the entire Commercial Area on the east side of E1
Camino Real at Del Rio along with a review of the existing and
potential zoning in the area (Exhibit C) .
The expansion of the Urban Services Area is based on the desire to
split the existing commercial zoned property. The existing Gen-
eral Plan contains policies restricting the spliting of property
outside the Urban Services Area (Exhibit F) . The existing zoning
of CN (Commercial Neighborhood) allows for no minimum lot size
(Exhibit G) . Any potential split would depend on the ability to
serve the created sites with adequate septic or sewer facilities.
In expanding the Urban Services Area, certain committments would
be implied. The General Plan currently lists specific services
that are related to urban uses specific needs (Exhibit F) . Such
items as drainage improvements, street improvements, street
lighting, solid waste disposal, utilities, and of course sewer.
Input from Southern California Gas notes no problem with serving
development in the area. Public Works has noted in the past by
Memo, the possibility of extending sewer services. The nearest
sewer line is located in El Camino Real just north of San Anselmo.
The 1 1/4 mile extension will require extensive development of
public facilities to serve the area between the freeway and El
Camino Real. At the time of extension of the line, some discus-
sion should occur as to Urban Services to the eastern side of E1
Camino Real. Fire services to the area will require development
of specific improvements. These improvements would be based on
the type of uses developed in the area and would be constructed at
the time of development.
Staff Report - February 2, 1987
GB 1D-87/ZC20-86
Page Four
ANALYSIS - Cont'd
The current Urban Services Area, in this area, are extended up the
Commercial Park area between E1 Camino Real and the freeway from
San Anselmo Road. The area was recently extended to include north
of the Del Rio intersection Commercial Neighborthood area
(Brazzi) . The proposal would add the remaining Commercial Area
along north E1 Camino Real to the Urban Services Area, with the
,jt .,exception of the Commercial areas further north (Rochelle) and
VI
across the freeway. The proposed expansion would bring the entire
kCommercial area, centering on the Del Rio intersection, into the
A* Urban Services Area, and would potentially be a logical expansion
of the area. If expanded, the spliting of property could occur
and consideration made of higher intensity uses for the area. As
per this report, that request for higher intensity uses is being
made and studied.
The study area is presently designated on the General Plan Land
Use Map as Retail Commercial. The Land Use Element clarifies the
entire area at the intersection of Del Rio and E1 Camino Real as
Neighborhood Commercial (Exhibit F, pages 68 and 71) . This des'
nation is reaffirmed in the existing CN (Commercial Neighborhood
zoning designation. The General Plan outlines the purpose of the
Neighborhood Commercial is to relieve the congestion on El Camino
Real by reducing the number of downtown trips. Areas to be lo-
cated for the convenience of the commuting residents, and to be
secondary to the surrounding residential area. The area
undoubtedly meets the policies already layed out in the General
Plan for Neighborhood Commercial.
In review of the other policies of the General Plan, two policies
make note of the expansion of Commercial uses. Policy 3 notes
that Commercial is to be developed in clusters to encourage con-
centration of compatible retail trade services in design coordin-
ated developments. Policy 4 notes that uses outside the Urban
Services Area shall be examined on an individual basis to assure
that there is no conflict between uses and parcel size with sewage
disposal being the primary factor. Of these two policies, the
proposed Land Use Designation would not be in conflict. The
policies do point out several points that need to be considered.
The clustering of uses and coordinated development would need to
be considered in this area, due to the areas high visibility at a
freeway off-ramp. With the possible expansion of the Urban
Services Area, Policy 4 becomes somewhat inoperable, but some
questions need to be examined. The area may be designated for
services, but the primary consideration in determining lot splits'
sewer will likely not be extended to the area for sometime. TO
present desire of the applicant is to continue the existing no
conforming residential uses and split them off on to separate
lots.
Staff Report - February 2, 1987
GP 1D-87/ZC 20-86
Page Five
ANALYSIS - Cont'd
The ability to use small lots for commercial lots at a future date
could lead to major problem of site development (trying to fit it
all on one site) . Currently, the area is underdeveloped for com-
mercial uses. (the one commercial structure appears to be vacant
and no business license is valid for the sites) . In the future,
commercial sites will be developed with septic systems due to the
lack of sewer. The areas needed for commercial development, will
have to take the need for larger sites into consideration; accomo-
dating buildings, parking, and public improvements along with
areas large enough for approvable septic systems and the needed
100% expansion area. It would appear that if the area is to stay
commercial, it will need large lots for development and lot split-
ing would only lead to future problems in commercially developing
the area. Alternative types of uses of less intensity could pro-
vide alternatives that would fit with the lack of sewer and
smaller lot sizes.
The General Plan notes several keys to the optimum commercial de-
velopment for the City of Atascadero (Exhibit F, page 65) ; of
these, several are applicable to the proposed study area. The
need for a strong and adequate Central Business District leads the
list. Any revision to allow for Retail Commercial could reduce
the possibility for a stronger Central Business District by fur-
ther spreading out the retail commercial uses along E1 Camino
Real. This spreading of Commercial Uses will also lead to typical
problem noted by the General Plan inherent in a larger strip com-
mercial development. The third item was to provide areas for
daily shopping needs convenient to residential neighborhoods. The
General Plan text provides specificly for two areas for neighbor-
hood commercial - the site in question - and one at Morro Road and
Portola as part of the Retail Commercial designated areas. The
Zoning Ordinance goes further, and establishes an area at the far
southern portions of the community at Santa Barbara and El Camino
Real, another at the intersection of El Camino Real and San
Jacinto. These, along with the Retail Commercial areas, serve the
daily shopping needs of the community (an area of 163 acres of
Commercial Retail zoned property and approximately 28 acres of
property zoned for Commercial Neighborhood) . Of this, the study
area and the adjoining area contains approximately 16 acres (57%
of the total) to serve a neighborhood approximately 1/5 of the
City (Exhibit I) . The area would seem disproportionate in size to
the area being served. Full neighborhood shopping centers rarely
exceed 6 acres. The fifth item notes the need to concentrate com-
patible businesses to the exclusion of inharmonious uses. As
noted previously, the continued existance of residential uses is
anticipated and would become more attractive by the ability to
split property and potential sale of nonconforming residential
property.
• i
Staff Report - February 2, 1987
GP 1D-87/ZC 20-86
Page Six
ANALYSIS - Cont'd
The existing zoning of the study area is CN (Commercial Neighbor-
hood) . The area is part of the larger Neighborhood Commercial
area. The larger area encompasses all four corners of the inter-
section at El Camino Real & Del Rio - approximately 16 acres of
partially developed commercial property. The area contains a gas
service station providing extended retail convenience shopping, a
bar, and a vacant commercial building. The bulk of the area is
vacant or recently developed. The area is served well by freeway
access from the Del Rio Road off-ramp. Surrounding zoning is pre-
dominately RS (Residential Suburban) . The area is an extension of
the commercial strip (Commercial Park and Commercial Retail)
extending from Del Rio to San Jacinto roads between the freeway
and El Camino Real.
The Zoning Ordinance lists specific purposes for each of the
zoning designations. The CN' s (Commercial Neighborhood) purpo
reflects the General Plan designation providing for "small scale
retail shopping and personal services facilities at a neighborhood
level" . The ordinance goes further , noting that "Commercial
Neighborhood Zone is situated and designed to serve the limited
shopping and service needs of the immediately surrounding resi-
dential area". ' To accomplish this, the zone district restricts
the size of commercial uses and the types of uses to those that
would serve the daily needs of a residential area (Exhibits G &
H) . In contrast, the CR(Commercial Retail) zone is to provide "a
wide range of commercial uses to accomodate most of the retail and
service needs of the residents and surrounding areas" . It is an-
ticipated that uses looking to use CR zoned land would be the kind
that would want to be of the larger and more intense types of com-
mercial uses. Traffic impacts from the revision have been noted
as a problem by CalTrans and the need for a future traffic light.
Exact extent of impacts would vary depending on the type of ul-
timate use. Overall, the possible revision would introduce poten-
tially larger impacts on the surrounding areas. The interfacing
of heavy commercial type uses is noted in the General Plan as
needing higher density residential buffer . That is not to say
that the proposed revision would lead to additional increases in
density, but the General Plan would support such a request.
Overall, the proposal comes down to several questions. Does the
City need to expand the amount of commercial retail land with
reduction in Neighborhood Commercial? If needed, is it needed
this location, and would the expansion of the Urban Services Li
and the subsequent lot spliting, further the aims of the com-
mercial development of the area. It would appear that the City
has ample vacant commercial retail land and that a change in this
Staff Report - February 2, 1987
GP 1D-87/ZC 20-68
Page Seven
area would be incompatible with the surrounding present and future
development. The present area is ideal for Neighborhood Com-
mercial uses, but a question exists as to the need for the total
area presently designated for Neighborhood Commercial. The expan-
sion of Urban Services to provide for lotspliting to smaller lots
of nonconforming residential uses would appear to be detrimental
to the use of the area in the future for commercial uses.
The existance of an excess of CN(Commercial Neighborhood) zoning
has been noted; a potential exists to revise the existing excess.
The site is potentially an ideal site for CT(Commercial Tourist)
zoning - with its freeway exposure and access. The revision would
also keep the existing uses conforming to zoning, and would not
conflict with goals of the Central Business District. A revision
of this type would require further notification of that area as to
a change and a revision to the General Plan text.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends, based on the Analysis and Findings (Exhibit J)
that General Plan Amendment GP 1D-87 and Zone Change ZC 20-86, as
proposed, be denied. Staff would further recommend that the Plan-
ning Commission direct staff to advertise for a continued General
Plan Amendment and Zone Change to revise the Commercial Neighbor-
hood and Commercial Retail areas on the west side of El Camino
Real, and north and south of Del Rio Road.
JM:ph
ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A - Location Map
Exhibit B - General Plan Map
Exhibit C - Application Map
Exhibit D - Air Photo
Exhibit E - Property Ownership
Exhibit F - General Plan Text
Exhibit G - Zoning Ordinance Text
Exhibit H - Zoning Matrix
Exhibit I - Neighborhood Area
Exhibit J - Findings for Denial
_ ��,
s �
m
}
� � �
�, �, s
� -
� .
1...1
I...t
1...1
1...1 I
to �-
.. .. _ /!
Odo
I
r
i
1 IU
no we owl
N-04 r
an
onnes Owl ,
ease
® ... /
s
■11..
.IA.
.u.
1.61
owl
111:Ingo
8.1
:
I.....1..\ /■I� I l
Il■..■\... WOA ■■
on
u .■ r , 'j�.�� a:viii ��r i\
9 Boom
■uo'a' .v.
•
®��� �� �
�
�_ ® ®
_�` - /� '.
� � o��
® � ��
� ��� �
�� _ .�� ��
• � ��
�..1 � �
� �� �� ��'� PA ��
e ® ,•� ;: . .��
®�� � 7���� ������
�� ��� �
� ' ,' I� .` ` iii i�_��'���/ ���'',3i.�.
.� � �.. �=+iii�������� �..'-���'
1 .. _. ,��
��' `��
I t • �� �..
I ?► _ r
v %� �'',
r _ s �
� :-��
��
� � , � .
•� ,��,
•�► ��'� .
.� �.
� �. ,
_ o ��.
. ,
��
� �
. -.
. .
� �. , �,
D � / I ► CP �• �q
.�Q , ay. .aL °- J�Jf"r. �''.� y2.S f, �Ei'• ct t �D1't F•1 ',>�! k� < � ��b-
SW
rt
't a� , :; i i �5 �`�a:�$�;s6s i'r�...' 3i''gc'<+rlF �'7 }:" '' u` .•t''',� '!`_ b �Y'3.�.
ylr ;+ ..1'� 'j= /:F iJ r r .!> f 'Jo'A' 1t l� 3`•ti ; "'
jif
T� �KS"V' ;,.3+ .'. z � 7� a_,r es24ry�0:�D`-�r"�f" .► '�!"R, �,.a }. �i,:,
-+ As�.i►'[� �'tf.- < ="i"��., ��di? �.� `�`'� ''S::t! 1-����' '. � $t 'r��`- Y•.�..i.C.'��'yf��� !'r��L ��-
�41qii`' kr b7.�,',a.•x_^ . a ' _s-
4 ��i�'�.-dk���'�'��. 4 Kyr Y�j �} � - � ,r'.:> -LI. 7'' w�.�'iti a a,,�i�"."
t_i4 �• :,hv+'`s s {�, ��,y•f I• 5.'s i. Y+it
a:•�`+5�7; - `rt'�-;. `� „C',.rc�'�j' clt�i F1�,.'E'����Y ..}{f(-�{{� fc,1 � '*"{��w.`�� d�� �P, :i•'• Y,� � -:
j"•-+.c� '`' �h,.q Jk tf'�.' : -�3 F_ � •�+�'„``t�` a3F` `'' ��p\ �rri•.'0•�`•��'` ;� ,F �L+�`'�"\'y' f•`°. `�d' `�.
'F=:.c Y. {.� e ��••� - P!'/� ,,a�yy,! �-_.i 4 �}� ,x+�,+�j{ t¢ z.,r7 ��'tG- �r., :F'� i-�_' S�.�� ,.
� . ;t x r y., r8 � t aT - � '.ta 1 s a �,. T• rra.
r�yya'�^�•'r,� . +i ,l•, �rat;Y .` �� ,,� � ��T},{�f,�y`.tx �`��,,ti�_,t3•'r�i� �.•e� 1Y r�'� ie+ �S�it �_•Tr $�
:ea.34 r�•o"';•k � t'i t�'- i v -'yfs � iS`'Y?S•ts� y>'a _v 9l Fr. F�?-' '��ts -f e
'Y ��ri�'ti � a� N �• �Ja r. ��-`'p.' •_.�-+�`4.��Ji" rr�� 1< "a' �Y31` `+t2�. ��ia�
T2 ?� •. @Rs4� '' r sv i 4 -.:SAY _
awUT!: tl_ ,���,{,yS'IY �it� i�'�•,} i,k�-• �"�Jpf. � `�6 �'M h` > _
rzl+"?i'_ a ��.'1^!a'�`�', r ty�3rJ► �+.,( �„VSs y'gy= i.l is a,t��`L•�f�i.t,��'T`� + ;j '#+
i ?�'x'a �.5.-pix'] a,'i�''N'�.i»� G... � ✓�1•P � 'C•iitr• - � ';m P;�..i�,�-�C T �'e'^.Q '3�;>'°� } .
.,_�� ��_ '��� 4 t�� �'N •c� ��� ryl w T -t f' v-4`��1 gY���- y=£ � �� L.: �P��!' taY J6��-�.`'4r"d +���} -_
`A•y ,;+ r #�iF�Ft 'i .,� �{`¢1 •ia.3`x. O '" o, 'SfZ?- 3 vVst4 x� -^-
}.-+:4 .G�' yt �BwH• j,. {' "5;.. "'it'�h.w i taN 4r +'t.C' ' '; ,ts'a,:. k '-
r�.. s
zz
�`J���a 4�1 �. � "� 1 i.�j �' Jul ✓ � _ '
fii; J T►s ...�_ 'S �, � i� ,Er r<:. -.. yvi�"" wz
�r�-,r�.�"" "wq. � �.,€' ;� '�e3u k �_.�' z .•��.�- t�# �:�J �r. ,f�.d` -c 7.!1�"`•. .
30
'§ir� pil-�x 'Y+4, 1��+ �i;� -"s- ' � �_ � .TriwitY (�.f I� Y� S. � l..t s�►'3�A+ .
f (iyi4
���..�".•''- •�-� �! '.`� �� ¢� z W'.•.'§,,F � i ,5,, ' o Gni _„�� ^pn�:*y � _
�?• „1'Lr'• $ ��Svy �' >Z.�` LIEF its` 4 �,\� •�' s < `��," ', �Ct�` +�kr,�t..��Lk•
x-x-:R,i i�'r,C3s��.-�•":t<�a}i�+'y'x����45"�-�;�`tS�}t�tty'i����2�.Q".��rt."-.^�t<rr� l Q�`g3`•s.-�A� �'�'-�. '�'tt-�si,�,.--,QtjS�tya.'n?',ry�,(Y��T•-��L4t,YY•+s�,+-Rte,rt_•.��'"{3t�?VSs �•�ct �`Y�I�'�4�,r'.s"P.jF��Zy����n�,7�1+�es�i'„+g<��i] 2�.y`��,5`,?S����•4a'=�ti�4`r.,�r?C+ssy�jy7t�Ziti����j*"�eS,�,��t�:'A�°.�.>�rt/;'.'�N'.;l��;'' IWN-
az 1��
AMC-, fi
•
dYs
a,`...
�y .x�7 E. > 'iT�•rF'{ 3�s � t 3y �^ai?�&���#✓��'6"��s` <!�+` -v _� �'_
�•t 'yf�� aS�La.,µ'9 :'�;s'%� 1 e '�.��-� r y .r..� ��F�l�a i�d+� �j��.Wg� Svc� ��- �r�,
,[�ztsff.� tit t
sr�� €€' NA
- -.t •4�.�1�«��o �r T qy^• '�` e'' _ -
�� 6y-aa•a. �., yah _(c! tea' ,may w �+�(�.y� i .� - fcV F,-{.3.-3�, � i7 � t
.`i�.r �l� '4/•._ _��i�y�,€a 5 lac .+` � ..•• j� a f���-s,J �Y ;� .g>it �f•
fet
�'i/�"�sa �� �v�a,�rs � .' _ �� ,r: � t '�E*r'r�'J� s �-�ll► E � .��'t�`�tzar'vs�'i'�l �� ,si �"� ��3t ��?*+iTE'
* yc� J�`�i�. •�! F�\! r < p�Q'- < �-��]`�`���i3:���i�„f�*s��� �r � ry�� '..y
-1. parr- ''• � � -#�d 5�� `M } r t y,��ia1� `s' 3' � 1 .•, 7M �/j�s� •.
.iF;..�s �: '�a "r if;L+ �� .µ. s ?
.,.v 4� .” t S ''a .l�K% yaF 'I�l 'i`� i S f}^+S♦ „ �i � 1
• { 'Iwn
4 �♦ �� st i6. pj. +AVS �tsss►►►♦
�- A
.tom -'e; � }!.ti �3 .?�r+•i..,.tia�.,z "t' .r }�t,��n'�YY•,rr -'��,� �. T;��t � � s trig
Tilt
j}-_-
• '';+.!'��, L� �+'�, ,�y ,Y`}���t��i�• •t
'•. 1. a tr
_,�- � � �•'' lt"c (,'{ �•aFtrX
�;•} ..�`� x!�"`a�'.}► { ��s'fyiy��,� ;,.�} �'��s•t °M1�k � "s � `� - `r � ` -,A�� r -
4st(a' YY__` :LYaite,.,L�ih int '3
t �•Y �r X : "t.._ .� �. �'s" + `A,.
�y�tiut{
y �,�.A.'''3�.'- l � A .6r'L :! s. -.a. � ► �, �..�k r e_ C;P � •i..r, s7.
w a y n WJ ti w ti .
a tZ 3 ♦ u= 4
I /
Z ° OVOY
j OZl tl&VO
r � ° fpt
v �
c t r M N
y a
- � 0
a -0
Z
4
��p
w os •o. 3_Bzeo.�viv °
W i
N�D. L N a
� s
sz ac
106
(p
_ N �
@Y01,
+ 2C2 ooi
N N
VS ver
p ssc -90
^� N
v
� O 4O4 V
•� � a s Y9� O 4\ a
e O � .2 q � ."c�.r c v � •4 i
OB SPOeer�r
R/O
_ s o
p N t N' '•> �OD `U CIS jf c+
.9 N
n n N vo
0 � u
A p v♦
S .ee
O
.'C w O� ♦ �'Q.. b N
'O c
`J a
b
qlb
o CX14181T E 1�ZD�CYn a�n�eslflF
GP
-ID -57 1 ZC ZD•OG
fig
CX'PnnJSIDV a U2OOU��!<%r�r.- .na
._
i •
a. The Area Inside the Urban Reserve Line
The purpose of the Urban Reserve Line is to indicate the
ultimate
boundary for the expansion of urban and suburban
uses. It normally relates closely Y to the provision of
future public services and facilities and is dictated
largely by topographic considerations, existing land use
patterns and community attitudes. In this Plan the
Urban Reserve Line generally coincides with the Atascadero
Colony boundary, except for two Agricultural Preserves
and a portion of a third (The Eagle Ranch Agriculture
Preserve has a total of 5, 978 acres, of which 2 , 786 acres
are within the Colony boundaries) that are located on the
periphery of the Colony and except for areas south of
Santa Barbara Road and west of the summit of Frog Pond
Mountain. These three preserves total 3,907 acres (see
Maps V-1 and V-2) . Continued agricultural use of these
properties is encouraged. If the properties are removed
from preserve status and desired for urban or suburban
uses, it will be necessary to expand the Urban Reserve
Line and amend the General Plan. A study will be made to
determine the appropriate land use classification for each.
The net area of 20, 253 acres enclosed by this Line is
approximately 44. 70 or 6, 253 acres greater than the area
within the Urban Reserve Line of the 1968 Plan. The
justification for this enlarged area goes back to the
original concept for the Colony, i.e-. , the Colony was
subdivided in 1914 as a single development, with water to
be made available to every lot by a mutually owned water
company, and platted roads fitted to the contours of the
rolling terrain. The Urban Reserve Line is indicated on
Map V-1. The Urban Reserve Area is further divided into
two sub-areas, the Urban Services area and the Suburban
Services Area. They are described below.
b. The Urban Services Area
The Urban Services Line defines the area that will eventually
be furnished with major public and quasi-public services.
The Urban Services Area--3, 714 subdivided acres--comprises
15 . 4 per cent of the Urban Reserve Area. This acreage will
be served by some or all of the essential urban services,
including:
Ambulance Sewers
Cultural Facilities Solid Waste Disposal
Drainage Street Lighting
Fire Protection Street Sweeping
Improvement Districts Street Trees
Library Streets
Parks Utilities
Police Water
The Urban Services Area in this Plan approximates the
present Sanitary Improvement District, The Urban Services
Area is indicated on Map V-1 .
54 . EXUM(T F G-ENEeX PLAN( ?LAS
67: 1 D.97 1 ZC ZD -t6
Commercial properties are strung out inordinately
along E1 Camino Real.
Commercial properties are sporadically developed and
mixed in with incompatible uses and operating in sub-
standard buildings. These are conditions leading to
blight.
The Central Business District is "hemmed in" and
requires specific planning for an orderly expansion.
Off-street parking in the Central Business District
is grossly inadequate.
The key to optimum commercial development in Atascadero is:
(1) the development of a strong and adequate Central Businesa
District, (2) provision for areas for heavy commerce and
commercial services outside the CBD, but with convenient
access, (3) provision of areas for daily shopping needs con-
venient to resident_ial neighborhoods , 4 location of highway
businesses near key freeway accesses , (5) encouragement of
_ the concentration of compatible businesses to the exclusion
of inharmonious uses and (6) the provision of convenient and
adequate off-street parking.
To meet these objectives, proposals are -made in this Plan
regarding several categories of commercial use which are com-
bined as Retail Commercial and Service Commercial. Although
shown on the Plan Map as Retail Commercial, the particular
uses described below yary, enough_ in appropriate purposes and
character to be categorized as General Retail, Downtown,
Neighborhood and Tourist Commercial.
RETAIL COMIKERCIAL
General Retail
This land use currently is found along E1 Camino Real from
Traffic Way to San Anselmo Road, on the east side. of, El Camino
Real from the Thrifty Drug complex to Pueblo Avenue, and on
the east side of El Camino Real at Santa Rosa Road. There
are many vacant properties in each of these areas which can
be developed to meet 'shopping needs for the immediate future.
El Camino Peal is Atascadero ''s principal strip commercial
area. The typical stores, which locate along this commercial
"ribbon" are specialized,, auto-oriented commercial uses .
That is, a shopper usually makes a special auto trip to a
particular store. These commercial uses do not have to
depend upon larger nearby stores to draw customers, as is
the case in a shopping center. Along many sections of this
route there are mixed commercial uses of all kinds. These
y
65 ,
0 0
are areas where problems of strip commercial development
are most acute:
1. Parking areas on shallow lots, especially near the
Central Business District, are inadequate.
2. Vehicular movements on, off and across E1 Camino Real
severely limit the capacity of the roadway. .
3. Each business requires a separate sign large enough to
be seen by the motoring public; this can create a
condition of visual chaos and confusion.
4. Pedestrian crossings of strip commercial streets can
be difficult.
5. Shoppers are required to use their automobiles to go
from one business to another.
General Retail Policy Proposals
1. Parking districts shall be formed along E1 Camino Real.
Cooperative parking lots shall be encouraged.
2. Traffic congestion shall be relieved by limiting the
number of places for automobiles to turn on and off
the roadway.
3. Commercial uses shall be developed in clusters to
encourage concentrations of compatible retail trade
service.. Each cluster shall e developed in a coor in-.
ated arc itectural desian. The signing and i enti._1.ca-
tion of the stores in each cluster shall be combined,
thus reducina the confusing clutter.
4. Commercial uses .outside the Urban Services Line shall
be examined and reviewed, on an individual asis, o
insure that there is no conflict between the intensity
of the land use and minimum Darcel sizes. Sewacre dis--
oosal shall be a *gime factor for consideration.
Central Business District Commercial
Businesses in the Central Business District of Atascadero
are mostly specialized retail services supplying domestic
needs such as retail shoes, offices and financial institu-
tions. Shops offering convenience goods such as foods,
drugs , and personal services are located along the edges of
the central area nearest residential districts.
Retail businesses that supply domestic needs are most effi-
ciently located in close proximity to each other. The
specialized character of the Central Business District,
66 .
n:.
� s
combined with its high density, should encourage pedestrian
comparison shopping, with ample parking within easy walking
distance.
Highway-related commercial uses typified by gas stations ,
automotive sales and services, and commercial recreation
uses are better located outside the downtown area.
Included in the Central Business District Area are:
1. The original Central Business District from
Rosario Avenue to West Pall and El Camino
Real to Lewis Avenue
2. The Plaza del Camino, Units 1 and 2
3. The Safeway-Thrifty Drug Complex
Vacant land still exists in these areas, primarily on Entrada
and Lewis Avenues and West Mall and at the corner of Entrada
and E1 Camino Real.
Because expansion of the CBD is limited by topography and
Freeway 101, the maximum commercial floor area at maximum
buildout is 725, 000 square feet. This figure is based on
the gross square footage obtainable in existing structures ,
plus what can be added by one story buildout on vacant land
with adequate parking.
Expansion of the CBD across Atascadero Creek has created two
shopping areas that are inadequately linked. Automobile
trips are inconveniently generated between the two areas ,
contributing to traffic congestion in the core area, which
lacks adequate off-street parking.
The Sunken Gardens and Veterans ' Memorial Building .form a
central plaza for the downtown district. Atascadero Creek
contributes to the parklike atmosphere of the plaza. Uses
and architecture that harmonize and complement this atmosphere
will enhance the downtown theme.
Central Business District Policy Proposals
1. Programs are needed to solve traffic congestion,
pedestrian circulation and parking problems.
2. The downtown area shall be specifically planned for
human activity rather than car storage. Parking shall
be provided in lots that. are convenient to commercial
uses. There shall be buffering and circulation patterns
within the total parking lot area.
67 .
3. Landscaping and a deliberate architectural quality and
style would benefit merchants in the downtown area, as
well as the community.
4. Some incompatible uses shall be given incentive to
relocate into more compatible areas.
_ 5. Of primary importance in the implementation of the
Central Business District Commercial objectives is the
need for more detailed studv and a phased program that
includes the following steps :
- Detailed analysis (check with all owners about
ideas, needs, economics , plans for expansions ,
etc. ) .
- Formation of a Downtown Improvement Association.
- Detailed study and design (goals and policies ,
alternative methods and phasing) .
- Completion and adoption of a plan and a method of
implementing it.
- Initiation of a step-by-step implementation program.
6. The Atascadero Creekway Plan Scheme One shall be included
as the basis of specific study of the Central Business
District, and its proposals shall be implemented.
Neighborhood Commercial
These are retail. businesses and services that supply the
daily needs of the community. Usually, a grocery store
anchors the neighborhood shopping center. Around it are
clustered convenience, stores such as the drug store, the
barber, laundromat, perhaps a service station, among others .
Neighborhood centers are best located at intersections of
primary or secondary arterials, thus providing easy access
for residents of adjacent neighborhoods for minor, everyday
shopping needs. Such land use is currently designated in
two areas:
1. On the four corners of El Camino Real and Del Rio
Road.
2. On the two western corners of Portola Road at Morro
Road.
Neighborhood Policy Proposals
1. In order to relieve traffic congestion along E1 Camino
Real and reduce the number of daily trips downtown,
proposed convenience stores shall be encouraged to
locate in neighborhood areas .
68 .
n_
2. Additional commercial land uses shall be designated on
the north side of Morro Road, from the existing commer-
cial uses to Santa Ynez Avenue. Such addition will
facilitate traffic flow by offering entrance to and
egress from Morro Road, Curbaril Avenue and Santa Ynez
Avenue. This area comprises 8 . 3 acres.
3 . If, because of population pressures , a need can be demon-
strated, C
emon-
s ra e ommerc.ia uses shouid be located where they are
convenient for commuting residents . In such a case a
ocation at either of the U.S . 101 intersections with
Del Rio Road and Santa Barbara Road shall be desirable
or a commercia eve opment. Such development shall
be secondary to surrounding residential uses and shall
necessitate a development plan.
Tourist Commercial
Tourist Commercial provides for uses that serve the traveling
public, such as motels, restaurants and automotive services.
These services are properly located at intersections of major
inter-community routes where permanent access are constructed
and which have some high aesthetic value.
Development of these areas shall relate strictly to the envir-
onmental and aesthetic principles suggested in the Atascadero
Policy statement and outlined in the COMMUNITY APPEARANCE
chapter of this Plan.
Commercial-Professional
This land use designation provides for the following general
categories of uses :
a. Offices; professional, business , medical, financial and
utility
b. Cultural or fine arts institutions
C. Personal services
d. Light retail commercial uses .
These categories of uses should be encouraged along arterials
or major collectors where high traffic volumes can be accommo-
dated and in areas where a compatible transition is desired
adjacent to single family areas. Access through residential
areas shall be discouraged.
71.
9 0
ADOPTED JUNE 27, 1983
40 CN (Commercial Neighborhood) Zone
9-3. 201. Purpose: This zone is established to provide for small
scale retail shopping and personal service facilities at the neighbor-
hood level. The Commercial Neighborhood Zone is situated and designed
to serve the limited shopping and service needs of the immediately
surrounding residential area.
9-3. 202. Allowable Uses: The following uses shall be allowed in
the Commercial Neighborhood Zone. The establishment of allowable uses
shall be as provided by Section 9-2.107 (Plot Plans) and Section
9-2.108 (Precise Plans) :
(a) Food and beverage retail sales, where areas of use are less
than 1000 square feet per store
(b) Roadside stands (See Section 9-6 .116)
(c) Temporary or seasonal retail sales (See Section 9-6 .174)
(d) General merchandise stores, where areas of use are less than
1000 square feet per store
(e) Accessory storage (See Section 9-6 .103)
(f) Personal services, where areas of use are less than 1000
square feet per store
(g) Utility transmission facilities
(h) Collection stations (See Section 9-6 .130)
(i) Eating and drinking places, where areas of use are greater
than 1000 square feet per store
(7) Bed and Breakfast
(k) Schools (See Section 9-6 .125)
9-3 . 203. Conditional Uses: The following uses may be allowed in
the Commercial Neighborhood Zone. The establishment of conditional
uses shall be as provided by Section 9-2 . 109 (Conditional Use
Permits) :
(a) Caretaker ' s residence (See Section 9-6. 104)
(b) Churches and related activities (See Section 9-6 .121)
(c) Pipelines \_
DC/�161T Lz ZDN 11`cx R-XT
CP: ID.57 f Zr ?!D- q f
ADOPTED JUITE 27, 1983
(d) Service Stations (See Section 9-6 .164)
(e) Food and beverage retail sales, where areas of use are
greater than 1000 square feet per store
(f) General merchandise stores, where areas of use are greater
- than 1000 square feet per store
(g) Personal services, where areas of use are greater than 1000
square feet per store
(h) Eating and drinking places, where areas of use are greater
than 1000 square feet per store
9-3. 204. Lot Size. There shall be no minimum lot size in the
Commercial Neighborhood Zone.
• •
ADOPTED JUNE 27, 1983
CR (Commercial Retail) Zone
9-3.221. Purpose: This zone is established to provide for a wide
range of commercial uses to accommodate most of the retail and service
needs of the residents of the City and surrounding areas.
9-3. 222. Allowable Uses: The following uses shall be allowed in
the Commercial Retail Zone. The establishment of allowable uses shall
be as provided by Section 9-2.107 (Plot Plans) and Section 9-2. 108
(Precise Plans) :
(a) Broadcast studios
(b) Building materials and hardware (See Section 9-6.165)
(c) Food and beverage retail sales
(d) Furniture, home furnishings and equipment
(e) General merchandise stores
(f) Mail order and vending
(g) Temporary or seasonal sales (See Section 9-6 .174)
(h) Financial services
(i) Health care services
(j) Offices
(k) Small scale manufacturing
(1) Temporary offices (See Section 9-6. 176)
(m) Personal services
(n) Light repair services
(o) Accessory storage (See Section 9-6 .103)
(p) Eating and drinking places
(q) Membership organizations
(r) Horticultural specialties (See Section 9-6 .116)
(s) Auto, mobilehome, vehicle dealers and suppliers (See Section
9-6 .163)
(t) Vehicle and equipment storage (See Section 9-6 .183)
ADOPTED JUNE 27, 1983
.�Jf
(u) Schools - business and vocational (See Section 9-6 .125)
(v) Utility transmission facilities
(w) Business support services, where all areas of use are lo-
cated within a building
(x) Social and service organizations
(y) Collection stations (See Section 9-6 . 130)
(z) Sales lots (See Section 9-6 .139)
(aa) Farm equipment and supplies
(bb) Fuel and ice dealers (See Section 9-6 .129)
(cc) Hotels and motels
(dd) Skilled Nursing Facility (See Section 9-6.134)
(ee) Bed and Breakfast
(ff) Retirement Hotel
(gg) Funeral Services
(hh) Schools (See Section 9-6 .125)
(ii) Utility service center
(jj ) Libraries and museums
(kk) Temporary Events (See Section 9-6.177)
9-3. 223. Conditional Uses: The following uses may be allowed in
the Commercial Retail Zone. The establishment of conditional uses
shall be as provided by Section 9-2.109 (Conditional Use Permits) :
(a) Amusement services
(b) Caretaker residence (See Section 9-6 .104)
(c) Service Station (See Section 9-6 .164)
(d) Public assembly and entertainment
(e) Indoor recreation services
(f) Animal hospitals (See Section 9-6 .110)
ADOPTED JUNE 27, 1983
(g) Auto Repair and Services (See Section 9-6 .168)
(h) Churches and related activities (See Sectiuon 9-6 .121)
(i) Food and kindred products (See Section 9-6 . 128)
(j) Pipelines
(k) Outdoor recreation services (See Section 9-6 .123)
(1) Sports Assembly
(m) Transit stations and terminals
(n) Kennels (See Section 9-6.111)
9-3. 224. Lot -Size: There shall be no minimum lot size in the
Commercial Retail zone.
i
CITY OF ATASCADERO A-ALLOWABLE C-CONDITIONAL
ZONING MATRIX - JUNE 27, 1983 S-SUBORDINATE H-HISTORICAL
*SPECIAL CONDITION
J
LAND USE A RS RSF LSF RMF CN CP CR CS CT CPK IP I L LS P
Accessory, Storage A A A A JA A A A A A A A A A A
Agricultural, A A A A
Accessory
Agricultural A C C JA
Processing
Amusement C IC C A A C
Services
_Animal Hospitals AIC C A
Apparel an A A JA A
Finished Products C*
. .Vehicle Dea ers A C A
. and Supplies
Auto Repair I C A S JA A A
and Services '
Bed and Breakfast 1C C C 1C A ' A" A A S C A A
Broadcasting H H IH 11H A A A JA JA A A
Studios I Ir
Building Materials A* A A I JA JA . A 1 . 1
and Hardware C*
'. Business Support H H IH H A* A* A A 11A A IC
Services
Caretaker CIC C C 1 C C C C C C C C CF
Residence
Cemetaries I CIC A
Chemical Products C 1C , C _
Churches and C C C C C C C
Related Activities
Collection 1A A A I A A A A A . A A A A A A JA
Stations
-Concrete, Gypsum, & C IC A
Plaster Products
Contract Constr- A A A A
tion- services -
Crop "Production A C A
and Grazing _
Eating • and, :'. .. A* A A A A SC C
Drinking:"P.laces • C*
Electronic and Scien I A*- A jA_ jAj
tific Instrumi 11 1 1 1 1C*
Farm Animal A 1A A IC A
Raising
Farm Equipment A A A A A
and Supplies
Farm Labor Quarters A
Financial - A A A I S
Services
Fisheries and PC A C
Game Preserves
t
DW161F H ZOUM& IUUUC
CP• IP17 { ZC W-E)G
DEL TZlO . LL CA'YNI►VO !LL• X
LAND USE A RS RSF LSF RMF CN CP CR CS CT CPK IP I L LS P
Food and Beverage A* A* A A S IS C
Retail Sales C* C*
Food and A C A A A A
Kindred Products
. Forestry A C AIA
Fuel and A JA A A A
Ice Dealers
Funeral Services A A
Furniture and A
Fixtures C*
Furniture, .Furn- A* A A S
ishin s & Equipment C*
General Merchandise A* A* A A S S S C
Stores C* C*
Glass Products C C IC IA
Healt Care A A SA
Services
Home Occupation A A A A 1A JA
Horticultural A A* A A A A C
Specialties C*
- Hotels, Motels A AA C
. Indoor Recreation C C S A C
Services
Kennel A C C C A
Laundries and A A A A
Dry Cleanin Plants
I. Libraries, Museums H H H H A A A A I A A A
Light epair
Services
Livestock A C
Specialties
um er and C C A
Wood Products
ac inery C C A
Manufacturing
Mail Order A A A A
and Vending
Membership A A JA Organizations
Meta In ustri.es, C
Primary
Mining (&Surface) C IC
Mobilehome C C C C
Development
Mobilehome A A A A
Dwelling
Mu tip e Family A
Dwelling
_Gttices H H H H A A A S S ffA
Organization C C C C
Houses
2
LAND USE A RS RSF .LSF IRMF CN CP CR CS CT CPK IP I L LS P
<`y Outdoor RecreationC C AA C .•
.- Paper Products C C Al
. Paving Materials C C A
PersonalH H H A* A* A A S S
Services C* C*
Petroleum C
Extraction
.. Petroleum Refining I I C
& Related Industry
-
. Pipelines A*A* CC 11C
lic
C C C C C C TIC
A
C*
Plastics an I C lic
C
Rubber Products
Primary Family A
Housing
. Public Assembly I C C A C C A
and Entertainment
�Recreational A C C
Vehicle Parks
Recycling and ( C C C
Scrap
Residential A A A A IA i JA I-
Accessor
y Uses
Residential A A A
Care * C* C*
Retirement Hotel C A A
Roadside Stands A A A A A A A i
Rural Sports & C C i A C
Group Facilities
Sales Lots A A C A A A
,Schools - Business H H H H A A A C iCliA
and Vocational
Schools C C C C A A A A A I I JAI
Service Stations C C C A
-
-Single Family A A A A (A I IA
Dwelling
Skilled Nursing A* A* A* . A A A A
Facilities C* C* C*
Small Scale A A I A A A
Manufacturing II
Social & Service A A A A
Organizations
Sports Assembly C C A C
Stone & Cut A* A A AJ -
Stone Products C* . _
Storage Yards A A Al I
Structural Clay & C C A
Related Products _
Temporary Dwelling A A A A flA
A
Temporary Events A_ A A A_ A A A A LA
A AIA A
Temporary Offices A A A A
:- Temporary or A A A A A A A A A A A
�1„t Seasonal Sales
LAND USE A RS RSF LSF RMF CN CP CR CS CT CPKIIiP Z L LS P
'
Textile Mills C I C CI
Transit Stations C C A C C C C A
and Terminals
Utility Service A A A A
Centers EF
Utility Trans- A A A A JA A A A A A A A A A A A
mission Facilities
Vehicle and C C C C
Freight Terminals
Vehicle and A JA A JA A
Eui ment- Stora e
. Warehousing C C A A
ll j
Wholesaling and A A A A
Distribution I
. .ZONING DESCRIPTIONS
A - AGRICULTURE ZONE
RS - RESIDENTIAL SUBURBAN ZONE
.RSF - RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY ZONE
LSF - LIMITED RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONE
RMF - RESIDENTIAL MULTIPLE FAMILY ZONE
CN - COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD ZONE
CP - COMMERCIAL PROFESSIONAL ZONE `
CR - 'COMMERCIAL RETAIL ZONE _ -
CS - COMMERCIAL SERVICE ZONE j
CT COMMERCIAL TOURIST ZONE
CPK - COMMERCIAL PARK ZONE
IP - INDUSTRIAL PARK ZONE
I - INDUSTRIAL ZONE
L - RECREATION ZONE
-LS - SPECIAL RECREATION ZONE
-P - PUBLIC ZONE
4
7 \
a,J
J ,J.
J
,
d i
..............
.................
. .................
,
j :• `.
_r:..:. ` :. .......... ......... .... .
...
7
._.3 ............... .............. ....:::::::::::.
a
0
:'iii\'-„ ,. . ............ ................. ...... ..........
....... .....
;.
V'O
Ojee
Oo O
..................
t
J�J
J
ee o
a
a
e'
�x
•-• ' ,
r e e o
e , ,
0 o n o
5-..z-..a:. _ _t- / J•e e.' .. �.a'eo, e e e J .:.�i i -f ' !�(j��"
^'`r,• A.T._ i:. % l -7•rs•
,
, J
J
v
r
00
,eO
� e
a
a
. ; e
J �
e
eae
e'
oc 4 i, cc0000� a' •e e e
e o e e
•o e
mm �
`fir rc�mxfx / J ♦.
o a
e e�
,:, mmmmmm e a
Dam00000
zzzzz
ee e
o e
e
a'
ZNV1,laNya
e ,
zzzzc
N c u ^
ave
DDDTTD •• YY..
M N
10,
e
e
e
.a
e
•e
e'
=Z�Nt1�x
1� a aeeo ae ,
�- oop
CO m b-a D e o 00 oveoo' /\
o'
.... NtATf'a3 D< •�Y � r 7 \ oeou'000�e� �� /
o
rro nDo2x7c \ .. y.
m � \
e'
m A
AF r
I ( >'c
O
mzm v `
mZm � `✓
ti
: ��Fa;g D(Fllgll I �IDGNP�RI na
(,P-ID-57 ZC 20 f,L,
EXHIBIT J
GP 1D-87/ZC 20-86
Findings for Denial
1. The proposed General Plan Land Use Map revision would not be con-
sistent with existing policies contained in the General Plan Land
Use Element with regard to overall commercial development in the
community.
2. The proposed redesignation would be incompatible with existing and
potential uses adjoining the site allowed by the current General
Plan and Zoning.
3. Adequate land is available within the Retail Commercial desig-
nations to provide for the needs of the community.
4. Extension of the Urban Services Area would be premature and
possibly detrimental to ultimate commercial development of the
area.
'ET ENG AGENDA
ATE -921TEM '#_� .
• M E M O R AN D U M
TO: City Council February 23, 1987
VIA: Michael Shelton, City Manager
FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director Me —
SUBJECT:
e -SUBJECT: General Plan Amendment 1C-87 and Zone Change 27-86
LOCATION: El Corte/E1 Dorado Study Area
APPLICANT: Peterson Development Company (S. Devencenzi)
REQUEST: To revise the existing General Plan from Moderate
Density Single Family to High Density Single Family
and coinciding Zone Change from RSF-Y (1 acre with
sewer 1 1/2 acre without sewer minimum lot size) to
RSF-X (1/2 acre minimum lot size) .
• BACKGROUND:
On February 2, 1987 , the Planning Commission conducted a public
hearing on the above-referenced matter and recommended approval
of request subject to the findings and conditions contained in
the attached staff report, which recommends that the General Plan
change be implemented by LSF-X Limited Single Family Residential,
which does not permit farm animal raising.
ANIMAL ISSUE:
The staff and Planning Commission have recommended that the zon-
ing change be to LSF, which is Limited Single Family Residential,
which precludes the future introduction of farm animal activities
in the neighborhood. This is due to 1/2 acre density being rec-
ommended for the neighborhood. There was a concern by the Com-
mission that there was no neighborhood testimony with respect to
this particular issue. The public hearing advertisement notes
that pre-existing legal conforming farm animal keeping would be
protected as a legal nonconforming use in the future, even with
the change to LSF zoning.
•
General Plan Amendment 1C-87/Zone Change 27-86 •
E1 Corte/El Dorado Study Area
Peterson Development Company (S. Devencenzi)
Page Two - February 23, 1987
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Approval of Draft Resolution No. 22-87.
2. Approval of Draft Ordinance 147-87.
ALTERNATIVES:
The City Council could select RSF-X zoning for the area, or deny
the request.
HE:ph
cc: Steve Devencenzi
Art Cunningham
Attachments: Draft Resolution No. 22 -87 •
Draft Ordinance No. 147-87
February 2, 1987, Planning Commission Staff Report
RESOLUTION NO. 22-87
A RESOLUTION OF THE ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL
APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN LAND
USE MAP CHANGING THE LAND USE DESIGNATION
BETWEEN EL CENTRO, EL CORTE, LA LINIA AND ARCADE ROADS
FROM MODERATE DENSITY SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO HIGH
DENSITY SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
(GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT GP 1C-87)
WHEREAS, a request to amend the City of Atascadero General Plan has
been received as follows :
General Plan Amendment GP 1C-87 : .
Request submitted y Peterson Development and as expanded by the City of
Atascadero to change the General Plan Land Use Map designation from Mod-
erate Density Single Family Residential to High Density Single Family
Residential. Subject property is located etween E1 Centro, El Corte, La
Linia and Arcade Roads . Negative Declaration to the provisions of CEQA
is to be certified.
WHEREAS, this request was considered by the Planning Commission at a
hearing held on February 2, 1987, and was recommended for approval : and
WHEREAS, such amendment to the General Plan was considered by the
City Council during a public hearing; and
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65323 provides that a general plan
be amended by the adoption of a resolution; and
WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Atascadero finds as follows :
1. A General Plan Land Use designation of High Density Single Family
Residential is consistent with the policies of the General Plan.
2. The proposed general plan amendment will not have a significant
adverse impact upon the environment, and preparation of an
Environmental Impact Report is not necessary.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Atascadero does resolve
to approve General Plan Amendment 1C-87 to change the 1980 Atascadero
General Plan Land Use Map as shown on the attached Exhibit A entitled
GP 1C-87 El Corte, El Dorado Study Area.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City
of Atascadero, California, held on the day of 1987.
CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA
By.
is MARJORIE MACKEY, Mayor
AYES :
N.i ,
Resolution No. 22-87 •
Page Two
DATE ADOPTED:
ATTEST:
BOYD C. SHARITZ, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
MICHAEL SHELTON, City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
JEFFREY G. JORGENSEN, City Attorney •
PREPARED BY:
HENRY ENG�N, Community Development Director
v
♦ '",
rr...•.'..... w.. WK
''
IW
�` •N. •aws.vr.
i:u �� Y —� ■iw z..o■
•• • 1 - V I � ill : l
f •
w■. i � y db
e•
N■c ��q•a�
•w
• • • • ♦ /� f
® �r
op
' � l
0 S
ORDINANCE NO. 147
AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ATASCADERO AMENDING SECTION MAP NUMBER 19 OF
THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAPS OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO
BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY BETWEEN EL CENTRO, EL
CORTE,, LA LINIA AND ARCADE ROADS FROM
MITED�RNSINGLE
ACTO
LSF-X{LIINGLEFAMILY) (ZONE CHANGE ZC 27-86)
WHEREAS, the proposed zoning map amendment is consistent with the
General Plan as required by Section 65860 of the California Government
Code; and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendment is in conformance with Section 65800
et seq. of the California Government Code concerning zoning regulations ;
and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendment will not have a significant adverse
impact upon the environment. The Negative Declaration previously prepared
for the project is adequate.
WHEREAS, the Atascadero Planning Commission held a public hearing
on February 2, 1987.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Atascadero does ordain as
follows :
Section 1. Council Findings.
1. The proposal is compatible with the surrounding land use and
zoning.
2. The proposal is consistent with the General Plan.
3. The proposal will not result in any significant adverse environ-
mental impacts . The Negative Declaration prepared for the project
is adequate.
Section 2. Zoning Map.
Map Number 19 of the Official Zoning Maps of the City of Atascadero
on file in the City Community Development Department is hereby amended
to reclassify area located between E1 Centro, El Corte, and La Linia Road
and properties on both sides of Arcade Road as shown on attached Exhibit A.
Section 3. Publication.
The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published once
within fifteen (15) days after its passage in the Atascadero News , a
newspaper of general circulation, printed, published, and circulated in
the City in accordance with Section 36933 of the Government Code ; shall
certify the adopting and posting of this ordinance and shall cause this
Ordinance No. 147
Page Two
ordinance and this certification together with proofing of posting to be
entered into the Book of Ordinances of this City.
Section 4. Effective Date.
This ordinance shall go into effect and be in full force and effect
at 12 :01 a.m. on the 31st day after its passage.
The foregoing ordinance was introduced on
and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council e on
AYES:
NOES :
ABSENT: CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA
By:
MARJORIE MACKEY, Mayor
ATTEST:
BOYD C. SHARITZ, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
MICHAEL SHELTON, City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
JEFFREY JORGENSEN, City Attorney
PREPARED BY:
HEN Y ENGEN, Community Development Director
•
Y
014
ori' �E � � •
•""I - *��, \ `
' c FLV15 t F?27(M TSS F-`/
LSF -X
RMFASE �, �- .,•
1
MF0 AV
. P
i - ;
/f '�A F� f \♦�♦ �o b
O ♦`♦ �•
` 46' ♦ OAS♦ ♦� .,. ''i
i
L f� I J t o O
� CSM t
� T�� l Qt's " `'° • ?— � -•` ��
♦� /� ,
As
�°�' �/•
° ` 1 ♦� �4.
`P coq i �,y ♦�Qa
c Is7. ,R
C T
,C R-
f
r �•\
r �LADERIO
Or •�v O
AVE
CL
F.
8
it
/ OL
i F•;,z FHS
• doo
.�� �• � , I �.�-' ^•'� DC�IIgIT A OL�DINIVGE
+ 1. ZnAlE �11 _1r� -7r; 77. ,x .
• •
• City of Atascadero Item:
STAFF REPORT
FOR: Planning Commission Meeting Date: February 2,. 1987
BY: Joel Moses, Associate Planner File No: GP:1C-87
ZC: 27-86
Project Address: El Corte/E1 Dorado Study Area (See Exhibit A)
SUBJECT:
General Plan Amendment GP:1C-87 and Zone Change ZC:27-86 initiated by
Peterson Development Company (Stephen Devencenzi) to revise the exist-
ing General Plan from Moderate Density Single Family to High Density
Single Family and coinciding Zone Change from RSF-Y (1 acre with sewer
1 1/2 acre without sewer minimum lot size) to RSF-X (1/2 acre minimum
lot size)
BACKGROUND:
Over the past several years, the area has been considered for revision
of the residential density. The most recent was a potential revision
to 10,000 square foot lots that was denied on a City-wide basis. The
application was expanded during the preliminary review of the General
Plan to cover not only the applicants property but a larger study
area.
Public hearing notice was published in the Atascadero News on January
23, 1987, and copies were set to all record property owners within 300
feet of the subject area.
A. LOCATION:
El Corte/El Dorado Study Area (See Exhibit A)
B. SITUATION AND FACTS:
1. Request. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .To revise the existing General
Plan Land Use Designation from
Moderate Density Single Family
to High Density Single Family
and coinciding Zone Change from
RSF-Y(Residential Single Family
1 acre with sewer, 1 1/2 acre
without sewer minimum lot size)
to RSF-X(1/2 acre minimum lot
size) .
0 •
Staff Report - February 2, 1987 •
GP 1C-87/ZC 27-86
Page Two
2. Applicant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Peterson Development Company
(S. Devencenzi)
3. Site Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Area between El Centro, E1
Dorado, LaLinia and property
on both sides of Arcade
4. Streets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .El Dorado-residential
Arcade-residential
E1 Corte-residential
LaLinia-residential
El Centro-residential
5. Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .RSF-Y Residential Single Family
(1 1/2 acre without sewer 1
acre with sewer minimum lot
size) LSF-X Limited Single
Family (1/2 acre minimum lot
size)
6. Existing Use. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Area is partially developed
with single family residential
7. Adjacent Zoning and Use. . . . . . . .North: RSF-X - Residential
to Entire Study Area South: RSF-Y - Residential
East: RMF-4 (PD. 6) - vacant
and residential
West: CR&CS - Commercial
development
8. General Plan Designation. . . . . . .Moderate Density Single Family
High Density Single Family
9. Terrain. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Rolling hillside, partially
developed residential
10. Environmental Status. . . . . . . . . . .Proposed Negative Declaration
C. ANALYSIS:
As noted, over the past few years several requests have been made to
revise the General Plan Land Use Designation and the zoning in the
area. The latest was a possible redesignation to 10 ,000 square foot
lots. At that time, the City was looking at several areas for the
designation. The City ultimately decided not to establish the 41
designation. During the preliminary General Plan Review,
Staff Report - February 2, 1987
GB 1C-87/ZC 27-86
Page Three
ANALYSIS - Cont'd
the City expanded the area covered by the applicant to include a
larger area. The areas present General Plan and Zoning designations
set minimum lot size based on sewer availability. The area is pres-
ently served by sewer and minimum lot size would be 1 acre. The pro-
posed revision would reduce the minimum lot size down to half an acre.
The applicant has provided a design for a 9 lot subdivision on his
6.81 acre site. The preliminary design is meant as an example of pos-
sible development. If changed, the site could be subdivided into 13
lots. A review of the entire area shows several lots that can be
split or reorganized to allow for additional lots. A major portion of
the area contains lots that are smaller than 1 acre and thus would not
be splitable (Exhibit D) .
The surrounding designations for land use and zoning show a contrast
gradation in land use intensities. Starting from E1 Camino Real, the
area starts as Commercial, then through the study area ModerDensity
Single Family, and then into Low Density Multi-family. The adjoining
Multi-family would equal out to 1 unit/10,000 square feet and the re-
quest would be for 21, 780 square feet (or 20, 000 if current General
Plan Amendment and Zone Change are approved) . It would appear that
the proposal would provide a better graduation of land uses away from
the intense land uses along E1 Camino Real. It would also provide for
the higher density buffer noted in General Plan Policies.
Potentially, the development will have some impacts on the community.
On previous reviews, staff has noted that individually traffic impacts
would be minimal. Staff would still consider the modifications min-
imal. Staff would still consider the modifications minimal and that
out of the area improvements (traffic lights) would reduce the problem
of access on to El Camino Real. A Traffic Study is being prepared by
another applicant that should be in within a week or so on a project
between the study area and El Camino Real. If the Commission feels
this to be of concern, a review of the traffic report would be made as
a part of the review of the revision.
Other impacts dealing with sewer and drainage were reviewed. The area
has the capability of being adequately served and impact development
fees will cover any needed facilities of any specific site. Impacts
to utilities and fire protection note that infrastructure is capable
of handling the increased density. Any specific site development
items would be handled at the time of development.
Staff Report - February 2, 1987
GP 1C-87/ZC 27-86
Page Four
ANALYSIS - Cont'd
Zoning is proposed to be RSF-X for the area. The existing zoning of
RSF-Y and LSF-X are different not only in allowing smaller lots but
that the LSF zone does not allow farm animals. The area along Arcade
Road has all small lots where farm animal raising would be a major
problem. The remaining area, if split down to the 1/2 acre minimum
lot size, would allow for one animal density unit but no large animals
would be allowed (horses, cows, pigs) , so a maximum of 2 small animals
would be allowed. It would seem appropriate that with the smaller lot
sizes, farm animals would be eliminated (dogs and cats not effected)
due to the setback requirements for pens.
D. RECOMMENDATION:
Staff, based on the applicants application and the proposed findings,
recommends approval of the proposed General Plan Amendment GP 1C-87
from Moderate Density Single Family to High Density Single Family and
Zone Change ZC 27-86 revising the zoning from RSF-Y (Residen
Single Family) to LSF-X (Limited Single Family) .
JM:ph
ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A - Loction Map
Exhibit B - General Plan Map
Exhibit C - Air Photo
Exhibit D - Lot Size Map
Exhibit E - Draft Resolution
Exhibit F - Draft Ordinance
< �•- f�i fir�L� �� ry-�}�-�� �7 n
QA
I R;M F
ASE
MIF-
0
lq ; -a ;ar
f, ;�J
o
� f
w
C
CO/ / �,� `" �6
Q4' l
. i r
PIS
ON
C\ V T_
_ C
F
f
y
0 � °�
•
SCA OEq / or
g\ O
cr
AVE
cc
}R
• �` J A 4 I / / C�
i
r
OL � � ; �c- '� SEW
L( `� ,
�+ L
S i+t♦ Y
1 3 L!I 1� � •
S U l B 1T A
GP • I 7 ZC• Z7 -06
�\wee\R•eee\ p/e
eI
IRM
�� I
reeve ` *ee eeN•e�•ee
row Lam/
uew uq• �.ee
Ie� �
uo�
reeM �
1r/ aism?�
• • ' `ii� wyq+�
pAr
•e•
Jay�`t00 •K
• �. 1 ••i/ � �'.` �
• r
1° s
�raatat;� � al' ��. . .. •J. �,• ♦ `f•' r� k- ;y' _ �tC. +�, r �f�
i..� �i �� +r}�rr � ire;�-ri!'i•� { °ts:. At t' fi:ri,'i�•. � �` �i.� ,: y�R?►'ts't•$.•• �[
-.`�j _ V�•+�'�`�'w ..\q'1 rryre �,!^ _^1 7'r"ls� r.\• N `I 't' ,, .��7 Drily- �i �'•?' 1 Js^
1C Fry,,-o•a-mL�' y` � 'i���r"�`- +' .I . � �tf• �Fy�Lr �C -ri �.'' � Yui
�•. rrY` yr W-.•c:.,; '� a ifs),,
„ �. .., t'f,.: ra♦ � r'•.`.�{ �'�`l b.y.. � � r„[r!�a..yr �a��✓ Yi.fes � �y�r
r-t''�! > �� i'; r' •!} Et`t"-a� 3^g S'•� � �• � `�•�.�`� .`� ♦ ` _7 � y, 'R"{t��„a.
� .. •tt ; >•r t a .t :7' ler...c ;.. � ..M T t.l�.�'�L.��t�A.. �y�t :'1' ��� .0 .r�y f
•G-� a�yn i a `tr t V,T --�,, y S.jir `R'1_ 1kf. •j�' w a..{�����1f �r -Yih rr yd-' !r '� fir' s�
-. � r.y�t 2ht-.,v s Cs r�r. �tX' C v't�,�•J^ - '.•• J �•X 4i�• ' ,� s;�� -?'°rt t� i ,r/+�.. � �a.s �• ��
"n ri
!t}F.+A4 .r
.S - 1 a. C'Y 4 s'C ,-' ;!3 '' ryYs � �.•ja +'L i a� � _ty/�a � �,i+�
�s..}tia.,+t-k, �/.. ..����zjZ-6� ;{'�i^ O� �.:st•- -';�j' �i �T
�'t'1 x. i'��.Y"I J.�-z�♦!♦ ..� 2s•Yroz�: 1'
zv s`•��?,?y,' t t`4=f� i`�''�,.. �����G:i .i.♦1''f��,�� `j�.r'��}}"�3'r.1G' � y�
j4. i {n FF��'� M n���'+\e�� 7..� �.• �r��xith �? ,''�� .+e•o'�`'�i��tira...��L�� � R't`�r +r` rs r i � y
i - r,.t. la /D .� r• rr '� s •T` +i.. 9t ..y _.��yt i�`"tf'a` tb�r'"�►-�' ,a'�`• si_ r y - .vY3' YAC yx Or
sv.
z. f -� t a i`7 y! Z,'' ♦'Mv 'L7 .0`rv'�, '� .t-., �r >�z` '`�+.,p,.i l`i
r i rIl'•'Rr.t1 4'r'f - �.,4rF"'41'.` .• Z. R t'r< 'p jP's� i'L,y��`,r.' f.'a."f' es�4gt �,rt►ji'
s f[k� �"' „/k 4 1 ,r:,. t t' 'r^-'.'�' �•_t 1.} q.�o ,`Z \ r..- � r!' AtiI4"'�21g,�,,^�.5,,�� !.i.S._`��' rpt:... t
.��:"'�� `+.� 3,oa� p • ::i%� -r f; }};:; �, �aa� f's'./�t'ti Is�. _��,�(�g�; -:��r --- i�"`'"`- � - - •`""�f'.`�y�'s~ ��
„S "�;.•:�'���; "_1 i� .a: '� r :.i-t tu��• �'- �t.t !f>,�,:;-P.•►�w.�"'".,, Nrf,p j 9 a�,> �,�. •�r: ri.•�,/�"�'
i i' 4 .ri, t 7.•<•7 i -t,�Y-t..F-�i .xt Tri �z.\yte�' `4 - •�.r /' r7y f-. "U•n
- r �•�.�+ _; ../ r:T'G••^ µ?�3 w ':'•'��s..��'I_r_��.�j.v r{�_ y'f��X.�, s"; ,,�'12,\4�t`•t .[. L_'-
r. �� �,rfi:• A' _.- !S i fii i+Q♦•. .�h, r�t,I;°� wrY- '•iCT r ,t's'z �,�4 �•�F .ti �� ��.t,�"!F � -3 - :a
h--44
:> �zes5 rt.Y t 've�C�„art'd �./ ! s:, aS� ;a1..�'� -� •a .�� '-xI�t•Sj�S.
�� T �i 1 t v4 ::J F 4ic .Fw�a 9 tt S ►J1• z J�q�' �+,,,
1riP �i3;. ` `R. '3'` •aS: +N'•.� ', « : .;F,
' t�i, '�! ti- .�v i �.�.��v fr7 �: fi.r Z[ J �• ��~•�x7 .•" r qtr 5�+2. :gig f s 4 i3`'_•
rfi. +ti'3yJ at.� '''�A- - S^ �,. +. ��'r.�"�' -:t t1 Z:��J ySr .� 7,,•,`• {� z.,.,'' y ,�"�r � .y, � /„ T, •�
{(j � �� a z �+'2"..a a ...y n .�`�;e.'•�'s- /.3<`p K'u' �'# tl _ t •ve-a{- iie ... a�t
f-: ff� ' - 'z" : I `a-7 �C .►'4"i,� 0�`'�; /""d,f,� ,t�w/'°'�F= y� r_�� '✓- �.° `A
Vytls� f :' c Jy k3� �• r firs •''S .{�"`, q r'F t:i .` r r. rx�dt} } - ;off-Y"- �t�P
'rt�F i , r ••-' g f�Ld_i.t�.r• I f- 1 `Y a{•%•.✓ t S. Ae
IiR�.I. ��IP.t'6�+tt/. � ,+ s-' ' Ci ,>•.G�3 sr--." '` >> int k����r�_tij., �r Y �-��+��^f,��'�"7't��'�,
t ,: aL4%t •CY ` �. .R.' • - 4�tL z' t cty„� r4 /J f�'�y'�,1 rn,A�,�� y
}rlf
s.� -rt��a.•'# t t 4 r"t •<f R�(� �jara 'ra'T rr'�' v��, '` �A'��'�,♦ ,``>�\�f.�-� ���#"ZA.�t �• � .'�'
^f ' - = Z �: rr 3.• .� Tib-� 7y�1� K hi ,H• ✓, _ �.1V w�a�I�, � �i.�y'.Z
:t -R•}y�� ��rtt,, .r_ L. L 'erY.� �,-
..� nax7.``�.�``z �.3�r �>r87! �..�'e1..,'-ir�f 4�7e s,.ti �>t`eX�f..-�- .yea,;•.L'tEt, ; ����t � r ,:ir`?-?O
\,,ki'c`x r �i � '''r-!~nL'` � ." A A'* Y'0•t r �' `(y� i f t
y � - • r3.Lr J i q„y, e. c 3k � J r p � / d •�!.
.r � >^�ry � .• .riw��. Y aE� � i •t.•� tr`r �, �?)l Y f �j•w '�+�/'.'��!�ij��:.{+!;
�.•.�' o � .4S � r'. Car`t ..r�., t ..) t.s.S t�� J7 f
r i' a 1 \� /� {F - �s''�<• '�•-' ..r, t -r r` �� r `'C aY1C.. � f r r,...•
�� -• 1..: � .,y� Y+: •l'.�
Y' �7• •ifY '+F"' L i •l.
'1 ✓ Id" f.� y.=s t a .# t.: -3 a 7 rat%• f, r� i�s'�
a ;'-s t -y.t'1 i.. •r r ..f;�•� y\- Fra .14 •.i i{•1"ri.r;>k ��.. �a �
'' a. ^ .a- ^`hS•,.✓��,�,a�Y -s - r/ �`tc 4 �.t�,.i ..'? • r l;a. k �i�a,i.0- �'-'� '•tea rs.
a t �.� ,�'=/l� �t�� (( r :•✓f -t` r �-.(a ry 'f yey•�• of p�>i•�, ,�•+ ,.yam 'f'� __,.
u- . � �►.X+� a -•sY - .Nc',ItjA'`s'3-�~Ci t;� ��5+> }r��` ����9��i�^if ;•'i' lr Fi r-r��7'+. y'Y.�n�.tr-�� l�.r� � � �a'y �`t'
`. ;" .�j 4� '-• ,r ie+ ,� i��2y�\VL "S '.x. •.i w .{ $ r.• jyr� 4 {✓ gs` f�S d a,• -?t.��•{Y<r,�-.,I
�•-: ��s..ss-.�' S�Y- ," �.�-yy++•yti h �i'S MPJ/�.v.}'f R����jF`�f.l, �' ��:,rL��`�'I' ) �,T.cr � a.l�bt`7,.r 3:i�{�Tl,/���I�i"} 1F,+!��::1��X}.f0�•
1p•. �_�.. - � 1r *t. ♦t Jqv
x.! Y,rQ { YS •t �`iZs`j.t.ii �'•L'rr.<h I L;.r F_ �I �.+r5
�. •� �'{�� �+r iL �• ``�••r' t°'+'r.��`�'- t>ct+,�`''�+�-" low
-,' r .\, t i `rf? � ,et�`s',r - rr.�!. r.�g '« r�•`= :
t i. .s' i r.{.. L}.�-.'9t iy L W - MIA-, Li:..+lp�` P. y �t •�.I i_ :.� r!�?Y-'.�+-j►tlf
r4 - t; `^ f• rf4z� e. �`° -at ".it'4' � lly': ".�r .a.r.��fiC ^'n1'`ltt.'`•E.i ry it i`„lk,i
y,' r - •a- r�r_Y�I ae� i �.: `., zy 1'S ..a yy r i' .. �Y Y' ; - f `�. <`�trS�� 1rc r f'�n�e1>':$r�f. as:lY:
Lt o.f � �: 4� �.y a s3�i..y..rsn r✓'.r'"• S: n � � 9�/'Y ♦ G:1� k .'f
i rs 'Id j d J J ✓.
_. ;4t4.+is z N .1r��,,.,...tt ��'+F.✓ t�r1F� ti a ,•-• ��(��` ��( s ys� N
'•t~ rek,,,• S'ye ..f r z t { ,t -�li-'#7 �, C' [�..a 'fd ., / �{,.�s �ilF/r riA'<f' )�rl i'
r L 6 �bt + �•W.-A, a� r.y t 1 t G tl as7 ; �3 yS-c dl
'`'u ka '' I Ai `.r-•�! a'rb°-{. ri �`ii.ii rr�r•Sf � i• ec::7!tT. r
.0 Aa ♦ • n, } '- \\o t w v `Yrm
J 4cq r' 1"�+''�^4 ,s a k
at y ✓ ..� 4-a•rr !!•i* •d,.., �fwir h. k'�.•i'. +l{F•'` y�.�• !!�'
A} �•S„ ,�v �. s �. .�' !t !t" 71Yj1 r tM"s . 7j
' r 3 1 tr
tl�ii.. yv�� Lrt 2 • ��oa�� �itAX� J..r: -t�w..r-4 ,l.! r-J lj +' a� �- �� •r...
�? s i1 -"i ✓�,;�v-T? •t, �.::�'�s G?7.;v`E"9`r•'r•.a 'r 1 ♦:kA�� ..
kTi• 'i'Cr O }L K �'�'�'��" t � .*'� �-z -co-'�I,, •l•7,
&I sya zu \�`S er." .� � i, C 1 L ya �lt�• �� .R
^t•R''I -4. gYt -.4 1- �' i \�L£a -'ti;f� • 1 iv's i�'v5s ♦1rvr `,. J .�'t.
r, tyj F.< -. is f`Yyr+�i4- 7� � -r •t.4, .ti - ;�_.t';7•r�s'1 S'_ -to S`�iY,ya. }"�idA a= •{''r 'a' Sj'Y:
�` .k'•r aYi,<T y. .a� "o'+Li 'e, tJ � i a� �ts v.s._ �, `,i e j 4�-,' .,�f 4.. j I�. r ,,r..a• - .�. '_si. -'µy,
-y:•. s e�r-'•x _ +�f: ,•.43i :.,rw• t. 6 r3 F ��Z J� y�a.l ?pD��.�i.X���'tst t� �.nr�l+a.;�s: t Nic,
{_ r zry .t:
. h.�''. ` '. � .'+{' � fWl s -=rl.t eiE;
:e'. :_• a� '° �. =:'n,tt/ tib: \ T��'t =ic;. �t,. _.. .,e .:�e� � s r"- 1... ta 4!�t"•k
^* ,�14 y_ --.rr '►h t' `.S .�.�.,L�'> 'jit s.s,�f �tl,-•. ►-i-.� i��.�� L x -� ��z� a�S-S��
t-•--4 - '{" f y T,�s r r' :c ,Y. S-tt•�i"'ins �V tc `s3 ; S'�-� g j,. :.�•ti'J: r ! i:• q. ✓�' a•:a�.C�� ,. j.
•!
�_r•:K• SSSC ja Yif�w, y -frsCY.o•.csi ��.s': .�,z:�3 IT 4�s+ K.. �jc�Se �+aV.• p` r '''.+'f\ r'. Y' �1/1•
•o 1 Jt.' .. a1 !4 t rs•
$, tE d' s l it4•: S'ry ri:;a'
:4 >. i - °� b.r.•t a 4 r tv r,.�� - � .°► � 3 ,;�I fu f f rJ✓¢`3. � J! '��/�,,t�w1
'>i��� r �.r a .t`ti.q►�; 3�;.t-< e-. :p__-� �• •;•C � ::VV��A�" �r/,�„t�.lS>Z'�`+tF��.•.i�,�.4:'�-.GerX.i4��
�- 7.i { 7:_. - �r .f'' .at s�r�.•�'i'�' 'F`•r ti•"'.`�,.•`,�zii �•.., O� i. I f}''a.. �L f d+ rli 'q` .{rl'1.�. j+:
,, a .5+�%z:•.t =n y � • 'w,�' �� ��7✓r t s G L!•IM�,rbj��iri;,�:•+ri�
' '� M 0 '� L .t. ♦ qJ p;�
�V� � • `ISA 3 -.� 5 Lali �� • •�^ h ��
SS
:1 d► L_ 1 -tea i a. ��`�� !.9�
ALI
t7 c
' ^ �p o�1,�a ,• �l ,1�� �• �i.v ,�f / /•qui E,.9a.� ,
1 p / X1.0 ' ,��� • °3M /"C
Yl-
-.1 oM \ ,{� �7,•-�. ' �� '�• _ t.o� � ,D�;�r+� K fl!•\�
v27 v
or
��F :�' R•d� to .� '(.19/' 7' '10 Ail
Ar
I,
\•rT
^ m, ;ag�y ry.,'\,.05.• '� 5.37 ':`+ � ��.- .�• /•30• �\f�BV
-v���
tr` rS 81 1.0CZ.7•. 4�Oh 5 ,V1 �c5t 4 �� 3.8
o ,'ai� LQF S1 *'1'. I.�'I•`P i �'- f4, ?� �, 47 �•!
�
3 ,t
q j < •5\3'35 .7� 8 <� o,�,t.8 �!- OP.�•!.o�� \ t 0 i �•..
W I�'`S •`' I,►n 3��I' ''` it t `
• r 4 ?' l•9'�f/.to
I.ID • 5�^ day :.j t'?� `�sg ! a'a3 Iq,% �'+` 4,70 6i
I�8 t \ ,•. - •. •� e� .� /�0 3' '3j\ t--�`8 .•�,4$ ACS 1•yl a-��
;t.0 o �.,8 ,i't1.•93 �i �.t.q '8 '�� /'7� �/�.so, q-,
16 -7a lb
EYMB/T D LDT S)ZE MA-p
r , o PL
GP 1C: 07 4 ZC = Z7• ?G
f�51��Z �•� ��_"
NDA
AG-'A91TEIN!)
2J
IT
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: City Council February 23, 1987
VIA: Michael Shelton, City Manager
W
FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director P&-
SUBJECT:
SUBJECT: Recommendations of the Planning Commission on ad hoc
Architectural Standards Review Committee' s proposed
Appearance Review Manual (Public Hearing) .
BACKGROUND:
On October 13, 1986 , the City Council received the recommenda-
tions of your ad hoc committee on Architectural Standards Review
and referred them to the Planning Commission for consideration
and further recommendation. The Commission has held a series of
study sessions culminating in a public hearing on February 2,
1987, and are recommending acceptance of modified guidelines. It
is proposed that the resolution approving the guidelines, be
acted upon at a hearing to be held in the near future related to
multi-family zoning standards which would amend the Zoning Ordin-
ance pertaining to Council-approved policies and criteria.
In making their recommendation, the Planning Commission suggested
that any appeals during the first year of appearance review
guidelines have appeals fees waived. The City Attorney has ad-
vised that such policy would either have to be evaluated on a
case-by-case basis by the Council or the fee resolution of the
City would have to be amended.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Conceptually approve the attached draft guidelines with staff
directed to bring back a resolution for consideration concur-
rent with the proposed implementing Zoning Ordinance revis-
ions.
2. Consider initiation of amendment to the General Plan, as part
of the April l 1987 cycle, to eliminate reference to a Design
Review Board and to substitute language on the appearance
review process being recommended.
HE:ph
cc: Ad Hoc Architectural Review Committee
Attachments: Planning Commission Minutes Excerpt, Feb. 2, 1987
February 2, 1987 , Planning Commission Staff Report
Draft Appearance Review Manual
City of Atascadero Item: B-1 •
STAFF REPORT
FOR: Planning Commission Meeting Date: 2/2/87
BY: Henry Engen, Community Development Director
SUBJECT:
Subject hearing to consider recommendation to Council on the ad
hoc Architectural Standards Review Committee' s proposed Appear-
ance Review Manual.
BACKGROUND:
The Planning Commission has been considering the referral by the
City Council of the recommendations of the ad hoc Architectural
Standards Review Committee at meetings of November 17, 1986, De-
cember 1, 1986, and a special meeting held on January 8, 1987.
(Refer to attached transmittal memoranda of 11/17 and 10/13/86. )
DRAFT APPEARANCE REVIEW MANUAL:
At the January 8 study session, the Commission made refinements •
to the draft and directed public hearing be held for public com-
ment prior to making recommendation to the City Council.
A recommendation to the City Council for adoption of the guide-
lines by resolution would best be done in conjunction with action
on the Zoning Ordinance amendments that are being considered as
part of the multi-family standards rewrite. As part of that
rewrite, it is proposed that the findings required for precise
plan and conditional use permit approval include language under
Section 9-2.109 (c) (4) (vi) , " . . .that the proposed project is in
compliance with any permanent City policy or criteria adopted by
ordinance or resolution of the City Council; . . . ".
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Following public hearing and any further refinements to the
draft, recommend to the City Council as follows:
(1) That the modified guidelines be adopted by resolution of
the City Council, with the suggestion that they be re-
evaluated in one year ;
(2) That the effective date for adoption of the Appearance
Review Manual be concurrent with the zoning amendment
dealing with findings;
(3) That the City initiate amendments to the General Plan in
the next cycle (post-April 1, 1987) to eliminate refer-
ence to a design review board and to substitute language
on the appearance review process being recommended.
HE:ph
Enclosures: November 17, 1987 transmittal memo to Planning Com-
mission; October 13, 1986, transmittal memo to City
Council
s/c - Public hearing draft Appearance Review
Manual, January 8, 1987
cc: Ad Hoc Architectural Standards Review Committee
2 ��
City of Atascadero
STAFF REPORT Item: B-1
FOR: Planning Commission Meeting Date: 11/17/86
BY: _- Henry Engen, Community Development Director
SUBJECT:
Consideration of recommendations of the ad-hoc Architectural Standards
Review Committee.
BACKGROUND:
On October 13, 1986 , the City Council considered the attached draft
report and recommendations of their ad-hoc committee. Action of the
City Council was to refer the matter to the Planning Commission for
consideration. Gary Harcourt, Chairman of the Committee, will make a
presentation on the recommendations of their committee.
ACTION REQUESTED:
Implementation of those recommendations will require study by the
Planning Commission prior to initiating possible zoning amendments to
accommodate adoption of the architectural guidelines. (Refer to mul-
ti-family Zoning -Ordinance draft. ) The Council has also requested
that the Commission forward recommendations on the draft guidelines.
Lastly, the General Plan would have to be amended to delete reference
to an architectural review commission in favor of the appearance re-
view process that is proposed.
HE:ps
Enclosures: October 13, 1986 staff report to City Council
s/c Draft Appearance Review Manual
z
{ ING 10/13/86 GI Dt - 1
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: City Council October 13, 1986
VIA: Michael Shelton, City Manager
FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Transmittal of recommendations of the ad-hoc Architectural
Standards Review Committee to the City Council
BACKGROUND:
On October 14, 1985, the City Council appointed a five person ad-hoc
committee to make recommendations upon establishment of architectural
standards and criteria (see attached staff report dated October 14,
1985) .
The Committee comprised of Joe Elkins, Gary Harcourt, Tina Metzger,
Harold Hayes, and Frank Henderson has met some 25 times since their
first meeting in November , 1985 and attached hereto are their
recommendations.
PROBLEM:
As indicated in the background materials which led to the creation of
the study committee, the City of Atascadero General Plan calls for es-
tablishment of a design review committee which has never been estab-
lished. The City' s Zoning Regulations contain application submission
requirements pertaining to architectural elevations, but there are no
criteria against which to judge any application. Concerns about the
visual impact of some multi-family projects and certain commercial/in-
dustrial projects along the freeway corridor led to a request for
evaluation of possibilities for establishing an architectural review
process in the City.
As noted in the October 14, 1985 staff report to the Council, the rec-
ommendation of the Planning Commission - which was accepted by the
Council- was to convene a citizen' s panel to make recommendations on
criteria and standards that could be incorporated into the City's dev-
elopment review process. The Council' s action was to not create an
architectural review commission or subcommittee of the Planning Com-
mission, but to consider aesthetic review as part of overall project
review.
ANALYSIS•
The Committee met two to four times a month between November, 1985
through August, 1986 to develop their proposed Appearance Review Man-
ual (see attachment) which provides criteria for project review and
evaluation essentially for non
-single sin le familY residential developments
RE: Architectural Standards Review Committee Recommendations
within the City. In reaching their conclusions, the committee under-
took field trip and follow-up video tape analyses of the major corri-
dor view sheds in the City, i.e. , Highway 101, E1 Camino Real, Morro
Road, and portions of Traffic Way. They extensively reviewed the
City' s General Plan and Zoning Ordinance as it pertains to appearance
of projects and reviewed design guidelines for a number of other com-
munities (refer to reference listing in draft manual) . In addition,
they developed, through committee member Tina Metzger , a draft drought
tolerant plants list for guidance on future projects in Atascadero
(see attached) .
As indicated in committee chairman Gary Harcourt' s transmittal letter ,
the committee, while focusing on appearance criteria and measures
necessary to implement the focus of their charge, recognize that there
are a number of other concurrent actions that would be desirable to be
initiated and implemented by the City to strengthen the visual quali-
ties of the community in the future. Staff supports the pursuit of
those recommendations but the thrust of this particular report is on
the recommendations relative to appearance guidelines.
The following are steps that would be necessary to adopt and implement
the recommendations of the ad-hoc committee:
1. Initiate zoning amendments- which would mandate a finding of
consistency with Council-adopted design appearance guidelines for
non-single family projects and larger scale discretionary projects
in single family districts.
2. Adopt the appearance review guidelines by resolution of the City
Council at the time of action on the zoning amendment.
3. Amend the General Plan to reflect the foregoing.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Following review and discussion, initiate a zoning amendment and refer
the architectural standards review committee report to the Planning
Commission for consideration of both the zoning amendment and their
recommended criteria in the appearance review manual.
HE:ps
Enclosure: Committee Chairman' s Letter dated October 8, 1986
Proposed Appearance Review Manual: Guidelines for Quality
Development in Atascadero
Drought Tolerant Plants for Atascadero
October 14, 1985 Staff Report to City Council
cc: Architectural Standards Review Committee Members
Planning Commission Members
f:archrept
'`�. �'k.
� _ III UI�I' ►' �''�-- �:�'°`y..',
• - fit• _ kl
Y� iii
�:
---- e
OW
owalo
I
• : •i g -a~mm 'r�
� �• � � '�� . ' ���i: It
It
dik alk
7-W =� ..
L
O
L
C 0
a ►,•�
E
C. L L
O a a c a Q
C c O c Q' Q
a L c C N C O O
a c to E O
a CL C U 4.
LL v
U. tri X U
Ota •- +' .- ++
F- w •- o o rts (0 3 + F. Cl)
Xa, O � u N N p
F- c E a c a N N cn N O
►•+ a 0 +► a O N O N a N 0:
U 2 U CA CA ►7 Q p Q z Q CL Q
C.
CD
c
z E
E
W
L
O C
?. U
W
Z a c
dft
c u
W vr^^, .-
o
Z >. t6 N •N 0 N 0 kA ~ •L ^ a (6O
J �t c a L � a 3 •- N O
a-� -C U
N •- 01 L a •- I •Q: ,-
O U IX 'O ^ L O am u '- 0 N w a
c 0 o Z U c e Y L) .c CC7
L t
a2Zm +� Lo 02 a u c 0
L a IV L Z O — TJ •— rG —i
O a 01 v co O L O
N L a z ^
L E a ,O
L X O C L L O L0 (dF- u
Q v � 3mmma . ww � U
tAW-1- Z • zZWO -
Z F- F- — O F-
UN w w Z O ~
JZQoi0OQ
W ¢ OW:3 MXO00
J
">--
ma w Z
m =
U X W 0 F-
W
LLZ ¢ WX (0
} w x LL a.0 aw -j . W
� x � � Wva. � 30-4 Z
Za- Qv W m � �
ZOLL (n."Mow "
0ZFQ— cn w3 ¢ ix
Z
U 0 m I 0 W W
W0LZOQWZF-
OZa ►~ O ~ Z ¢
0-1 F-
I Z 'JWWWNQ �
WJQ � = W -4 CLW
p F- 3a0QF- 0UQ-d
W ZZF- tWtt1Q >- W UYZOOY >- ZF- LLO } WQ - LOZ3 } =
z D Q0 W WXm �-. Z0ZF- U0JZ .. W F- F-
•
Q Wb-4 a _
J F- UU ¢ = W ... = 0WQ (nUJ F' >- vx ~" O W03Z
�-, U (n U ,X � '\ F- Nm WQWxfV U1x W
CO ZZD (AZ0 pttJU WQCt) Z ~ ..SW W Z Z
Z F-- = ZwWF- WU C QJZ } "" L F- Q ;
!R dOWO � ZwQ Wo F- Z -� X 0a. } 00 Jw � ww
v JW �Z � O ZJ wz -ja. Q <LF- --+ UZ W 0
= }. QWZ ?--J LLJOLLO (DQ L.)(n z =) Q0
O ~ ~ 00 0 mm0 QwLLI WO = ¢ C� WOO ~ mow
mF- '""' xU ¢ O O XQ: --4WZZ Z I F- <1
Z UwXCL W a- Z ¢ } � . ¢ Z Z '-' � ~ >- n- FF-
-
WZW Qx mJ0 .`= WO -JOO ¢ Jp � m W O
JiF- 0Z . QY (A Cn � (A UW
Wwu 0-4 (n Q0OOZ � UWZ = a- WF- Z ¢ 00 O
Ul Z <L <LW ~" Uz mWmJ ¢ (AZ WF- 0wU wF- LL
00Q2 O W .-. (rZ W ¢ F- W- 41uw .. ..JF- Z �'
CL fJ) Z � U � � � }- O (n F- XOQF- � OZU
WCL (n wXF- U .00oW ZU � ►-. � � O � Z
p ¢ (A C) CL J XZZZa- WW WJ mX " ZwO ¢ t
U (!) JWJ ¢ Z
I (nw ¢ Z_ ►-• U O v � w �. ... .-. � � ] � c� •-• 3 F- � WUJF'
_ F- " OO ¢ w0 QUW m � O W (A
.-,
-
� zJCncn ¢ cW Q. F- SIX-4 .Ll02U �Z7w :> -ia ()) ) :> (A
W ...
- Q ¢ m W S O � .., J
F- }- (f1 J ¢ 0 0 2 � O W W
Z Z
W (!) CA
103wIcU = —
F- F- Ut1mC� F- o ►-. QtnU � ¢ C] [r ►-• O ¢
z
W
a tv m c N w N qr w N a cqU- co
• - -" b d (o
y.
.. • • • ••• r � cv N m m l� m m Cry M
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Q
w
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Z
w
.7) .�
¢ cr,
7-1 W
LLF-
U -
w wd
w F- w Li-
of of
O - w u -
p Z F- p Cri
� F- Q Z Z w
w Q p
co 7
0 co F-- O a
z Z Z Q w Z UO
W J J F- F- U Y
. Z .-r F-.
O O W O Lr,, Q [fj
• J 'M CO F- w Z UL ? to •
W ... - F.. Z G `C
® O O C7 p LL LL- O Z UA
.-. Q Z CO H Q
( � O A. p ►-• co a- <C Z Q w
0 UL I UL Z w O 1 0-4 U Un
LL
3 2 6-4 S ¢ G w u 0 -J W- H
w w to w Z Z �.. a. 0 w
U;
p ►-y Z Z LL 0 Q C F- 0 CL z a 77
• D O O <I Z J Z Q W <L 5
O W a-� U •
W W W F- F- W p W WF- O J C -1
n
• Co Li W Q 4a Z U Z U Q Q
O
• t.7 to 2 F- J ill
• W it U W W Q O •-• ►-. Q ►-+ W G G O
• U UL Z W x J m O Z Z U Z U-)
U � � co
77
Z
_N LAJM
Lj CL
LY Z > CL Z
W O C Q C
Zd AC- :; C V O � 2 �U
C-)
K _ ¢ `^
C ' v'
CL J W C� V Q -
y W
W LLJW Z' W
'. Z
CL�' r C O O ►'
W O >O� = V W W V u O
�Ll W V� Cb O
Z Q CL 2 _C W
V Z Z Q w 0 0 O y
O y
! 0 W Q
~ � aC6 y
J►• W
a.
CL� ti
> V
x _ W
U
O ZW39
_
W H Vf <:,.= <" W
> W ~W y O > aL,a a m
UJ 2=
w c72c�C7 ' O
CL
L
j0-_
Z W
¢ O 5 y CL
a
W
U -
LL
QMOZ JLZ <LW '-BZW
W Q
Ix Q w = o W o Z W 3
w
Wu' QO -1 CL .-. rQIX 30
Q W W
.-,
U J = w U a 2 LL w 0 0 W
(- W C'3 � (t1
QQxOcl� w
LL cn '"' W W J (A w w lz
F- O LL U = ►-• �-• �
3U >- wZ UF- 3 rL ZU
V� <[ -0) DOLL WW � �
W x Z 0 p 0 0 0 m Q
xCL .-40 W W L = a =
Ch
ECO m
cc W ¢ ¢ oF- 0 zz Zw ~ <1
Z U w w LL U w
CL Z F- U W 'J
L1J ; W HW � Z ¢ F-- Cr <[ LL
w O [BZW .-. to
W ~ w 0 0 0 2 W U U O CO
WZW = WzXCL Ili CL.
LLWW
<1 -- XF- O <LtLQ3 F- QCOL " xIm
t7 o D -n m -v m D v 'v G) o D -1
• o c c D m � c � � _ -
C o ~ 0Dm
0 M E cnD -oao -� vmw om - rorm- c� v0 �
mz = o CZ oma mX -lo fro -< 3omrm- D` DO
m � c� v � p 0M (nm � N ~ � mmv ~ zv ~
•-� 3 c .o m
no = C a Xpm o -� c� mcn omcmmx -<
2Z � m Z ...� mZ Zry —i m " Z ;a
3mr v -qZ -0 -nDZ m ter- Xz 0
cnmcno •. ...
Z -u -D ZZ 4c ►.. n D ro C 0- O p
mD0T G? rDm � _ mmZ ~ mDCD3Z
... rc o m '_ '" m � Z -1ZDTZ0M
-gym Z ~ oZ
m
C) mm Z ND = umimcm � 2 � uci � r" T -t0 U mr
Sm -q mm € Zm ... o � 0 � � .-. Mmvo
D ,.� .-. p -.� 0 m X m 0 v 'rt
;u -0
r = � 3 � -u o NDocnmD
c7 -< Z o0o Z r � m � ; DZrm mZ = =
i m ~ D 3o
co --I -ort -Z•l � m -0m � -qM-0 m
_ o -i
CD3 Z = m � r (n m Drn � X -Co . m
cnc- D _-lo D .-. Z X � 3Z Drv -4
Z m 3Z. 0 2 m D r -i -{ D Z -C
c� Zmv -icer Dc� Z Dom i = 2 - mZo
ova o -ccn � rev cnmm i ZMWMO n
D D 2 cm o -1 -1 -n
-
-� mmc � 2 rnov
D = r '-• Z m - •
D C X COn m
IUM -4 mrmo MMO rcomo = omo � mo
.mac Mo - 3C mam -< o
x mm cn ~ -om ,° m or_- rm- .,, -nm , 3
o (0 ~ gym � O � CZ'� o -< 0m Z0n2DZ ~
rm r 0Z "� C m -uZ 2:-1 MZ
mom m (nD -< � CO D Zrmv3
o
M T -.
Z -I �.. m 0Zmc w D 0 0 ...
cnmmc ~ m mm m � � m io o vN
2 D ~
C0 � mzm ZDDD = to ZomD -vmCO
r 'v -i D cn m Z --i m cn m r- 2 r -•i
DooOm Dmp = v2 0Mm .{ .0M
Zm -i ZD t'� mi�1D o � m 03m
T DDm 0 ~ CO -nDD _ 0
M c zzm C00m .-q{ G7 --ir -r-1 � z
� (11OpZ m (7xm � ZRZIm mZ? pD �
Oa c Z o 0
Zn moD m Zr = Z
-�{ . . DG) M ;0 c7 � c "1 oz c7 t� �' p 23
oprpZ TJo 'mU mM ., Z o2 � Dcn ... n
m --� D _v
mD cn ~ ern m � X -n 20
m "'{ z� Im D o
m m D MDmZ � o
Zoom -Cv -ZiZ = DaEn m--i o -< ZzDo
J
2
• • r d
W N o
O T
W W W (no W W
= S = QW
QZ 6 O a ✓ S L
r W Q Z Z • \ i 0 6 = J O n J W N N W J.
�� T`• ^cn W �� z W
Q '1 � J aL 0 0 U 'Q ' 000~ S Q ✓ 6 ^J m = di6 it
W �... Y� V♦ • /� ( 6 a 'A 6 6
O ^ (L = V r•�+ O Wry a� CO W Jr W 6m
" LL Z Q LL9-4 s °i at oma•- o s r �'
3 O LL J 6O W r O o 6 O 6 m K
L�OL/ O U Q Q N
0 CL
LLI W W � � ��G
7
Z (' f `
W Z Q O LL IOL w
W J Z ZZ
m0U _: � ,,,� �
-J O m a O
-jQ � :3 OUWCL
�.. a0MW ... WJW
to CL F-
�-- L W V I L)
O Z F- S ,-, U) .-. Z &I g J,;f '•
JQ •-� U) Q .-. aZj �
L) (L $g
_ 3 a. Q W
W JY } C� Qw
O
L U J Z Z W r •a ~
UCL LCLW JO � � �
a_ = OJ
ZWOW ,,
Q <LQ0UL <[ QLLLa
Z W = Q J } Q Z W ;Z W Z W W J W W J O J W } ,1 W
F- O Z_ QUt!'1 .., .-. Q , C.OWUl . J_ ZQHQ • _1
(n " UO
O a <1 HUS = w3Qa _ zwQ
J W LJ 3 r-. W W ...... a, J J
Q W = U) F- ZJ Ca0OQLW " OULJJWLLWF- ZpO .-�
SOH U) " (i } W � W3 Wa. QOu- W � � ZWQ
�/� 3 Q J F- a, U) LLW Z ►... Q aZQ = Q
V! J p J W Q F- F- = Q O �-- Z ..y
in LZ X • � QLJ `'' Z Z ~ JP O ~ Qy (D
JwU) LLm WU1co UCLZwm W CL WZ } �Q - OOWLL ZW W •
LU W \ WIQ- .. W ,,., a, z O U m F- oUZOL LL
.-.
•-' L .a WOO � U) QZCL � ZZ .-+ �- • U) LL
LL
LL Q (naU) Ja. � ,Q WJU " UQZOW O ZZF'" OU) W Q ',
O ¢ W ~ ~ Q W W � OW oft.-. `YOW WU (DZOZOWO
N o = Z Zp = U � ^ J CL W U L E _Z ¢ U _U W U O O
= O (A0F 0Q WOWXWaw O tea: JzX Q- Z '
C ' F- Z_ X CLo - C- t-- > > � wdQQwZ <1 z LL F_ o ...
3 30 � � � W (� F�- ^ Y = � ZW ^ J ^ � Q � } w z
W Q � ocnozz WQL � EONZODF- a_ F- ZwZQOZJ
L o .. W <1F-- W = F- 00 WQo ., Z -" ZQSOWxO (L
L1! w o � zowwo ~ Q ~ wF- 3 } Q F- O Z Z 'L F- OL ! W
WOo .-4ZZ .-, (L tY OU3Q � WUC7 J ~ J3Ur <E 41
W :YJJZ .-. LUC Q W ... Wa. J ... ZZF- ~' F- lt1Q �YU) WL)
tL O WOZF- O '-' Q J WZ � J — OJ .-. " Z .-. " POZU) JT
LL O Q W U J a. W �t CL O w Z a. Z Q F- X F- � U- O a. O
W W = JW WOZ a. Q. SWcLwzo a_ O -JW Q
U mawa. ZLa. Q Q Q3LQL Z ZW ZJ LL
,
~ = cnc �• m =
mmDr- mcm
Z 'UC*t� D � t� DQD b-4
~
mr --I m -vmoTMM gMTO ED
mz rr- cum -< m MmoEDOM
W Z D ~ m ~ o a CU o � n
DZTDZ " mim ~ m � � = -WCQ
MOCZ —Io m � ZDcnr � 0
-< w —I = Z -a —I m D r =
• 0 -4 mw = -Um ~ Z' m £
00 -0 mrm DI a6-6� r '0Z � i . , z � � T r
_
W M 0 Z D�-• D ' c� DCmZD
" _MDN U) coZ' ot7 ~ Z =
a Z -q x = r- . . D
ZZoo cn �• -v v zc
.. r (- ~ -0G) m
Z
�n -C m m mmo --4D =-n-{ o ' Cm - m
z
m
o -Tl Cf) r
= moomz
mmzmmco
i
o =
wac -IZ -< ~ ooZr cnD = 'D -n
~ cn3Zvr
m -� rcm = m -vo To
0 = " Dr .... r- -D --Im ~ o M � mr
-Imor0Z -< m ;o -4Zco -0
comm Dr
M0c -r< 30 DaD � o :z Mm 0 � � £
o ~ m mm --Imv ►� c. 3cnM
cn co cn D m m o m Z
3Em -z-i � � � fir - .� n
c� Z r v�
ZM o r- m
zD -- � UriZT � c� c ► � D --i m �
-
�Ca " Duma m --irZ cZU) � o
vc mcnr cr, co D m c.
mrnm0 � c vv r o mom ZM
v mD -nZ DZc •• -i
C m m = ...
~ Z v ►-.
ZZD3 U)
roZow - � --10am
D
3m OCA � n m � Z
m o (1) Z D ; Z o m
;o
cn m I r— m
C31 m
wWwCo Lo LLC7a IJwx !- zOZZZ
Q: SS ¢ ZZOZZ Jww %
F- F- S F~ " w
¢ ~ 0 � F' a � 3 -� ad � De Z
w0 *-. 0 < .►.4ZiVy ¢ 0 < S WZ
Qopo cn m -jo ¢ 0w /�}-` Wm -�
�i. U w f IOL w F-1 l:
¢ S (n SOC _j F- WZ } (ply
LL ,... W
F- pF- Z F- Win ] W W YO = OOZu�
Q Z 00 ZSW � w >- t1U } IYU � Qw
�
w w ZU O3Occw i JF- w
¢ aJ ox ? F•"
WWW } Z (- W � Z ¢ Z ..� O 0 �
0 .
a.
ADW L) 3 ¢ U Op
• C'3 L i
Q w -J in =)mwa. 0 0 O ZF- U OCOX
J ''' ¢ Z � Q ¢ w W F-
wma
3Z - F- ((nW < n w � aL0 " F=- Zm Q
O ¢ WO .-, U CL cn F- O w
Z 'I - a. z ►-+ W W S x Z
cn w0 ~ JZ } ►m. (nCL Z J v � Q . Z OOZ
.-.
= � U � m EF- Z <1 c: ¢ CrWF- }- WF- W -70
J F- 0 .. Z
(L XJxF- YZ3 ZS w WOtZ XWF- WZ
CLIZIL (n--- Xx ¢ wxa (L 0 Ie W ¢ . F- Z
LL L CL L (Lm Owxmww (L CL (nW ZF- ZQ� xO
�.. '-' ¢ d ¢ Z 3CLOF- CLX cl Ca L O (n ¢ 3wU
wELF- i.Laa W (DazwwJZ -W
m0ZLLZW SZW ►-+ SWJ " Wm
W 4 O F- F- — -J U- = F-
F- z F- O U)
Q J Q 2 Q
-i 0- F- = 1 W -� J W 3 Q O Z
3QZOF-. (n ' J
Yui CL F- E-- LLiW � (� dLLI 00z
W Y } ¢ F- O W QW Z ? mm0
w 3F- WW (n � OZx S0 <1 U
Q wZM :cF- UF- ¢ ~ U) a }0-4 ~ US ¢ Z
...4 }
F- W � zp ZW0-4 W (oW • = � WO ~
Q
� U) 0 F- mCZ 0 ~ JF--. U
LL �l) 1-4 Z '-' m W w WQ Z UZ
a (0LLI U W QQQ -J (L LF- FF--
3 uiw = po • (L W ¢ O O
O Z (n � W
Z " � W Z<I CL O W . tL0 0E-
O WJWL-J F Uy � � ►-+ = Jx ¢ J p
i41IL LY F- (n J <10 (n - ¢ O O Uy W
! J W ` 0 } Q U ~ U U -1 O O Q
mUO W Z S W Z ►-+ W
W0-4ww
O QmU2W0 �-• ZF- wIYW F- CL
L7U OL
uF- t.L� ILF- W S < a
Q� F- aU3 .-• aLLF- ��
o n C ;o -4 D -I -I o CO D D D � -4 -4
mD -u — DoDm = C = = -•4 -4Z ' --f = = = 1
DX � rZ cnm -4 Mm v ' Do
rDmr _0 to mm cn cn C
-4ImD ;vcnmMm 0r- m -0 ;om --In Dm ..�
= r ; v m . -a •-• 6-4 N a.
m cn - no •� m � ;a Do
mr- 5 � _ n, = r. o a m �
nDmr- � oao ►•yv --avc� mo � mCD
� c £ 01-' ZoD � o = � , � � � ' � mr i r
�.
V< o = Dc-am � Zm ..,I = ZDoacmi� Z -uDDorm ; z
M r ..
D Z m � D _D� N oumicnr = m omrc7o � m
ZD S1iD0 -•� .. D fvsim D- m � �" _ ♦ ♦
vv = D ~ Zmom C') = - � Dz -IZv �
£ m ..6C -0 �,. m ;rD 0DZvmZmnm
r- -0 -- m � ... o o - 4rr- m -nv � -ICCD
DDco
o �Z� oZ "4 -vm nm DN --+ rZm
-•i
� 3 -'I � r � Z Maocn � --Ioo � Z
mC3.:< o =-IrDCZ DmcnCoco Zm � r
m -< mcoD -I Ccnm� DM D
M z� M �-' Z � 0 ;Dr M -02 -40
,.... ov .., CmCD � aD .4o -0
ccmn � N � -4 m oZc� m
= mtn -a =_ -+ v � v -4vmcmv_ D c_ o
T> C) O -4 -I •-'I -4 W CCZ—m0v �0
c� mr -4 = Zmo 000 -< cn•- c- m -nm
-
<
71
`'�'fir• `�_.,,"t•` r - ' i �
47
z •r Y+a, rir ' 1
;-4 L ti
I I I ill � III, ^Iilll� I; '�I
l + S LL DOZCnOOZW
3rQ O CL J = S O
CL co C3
�I' irk n J O J f j
I
e I v Es- �LU
OOJ � V
;1 c OO LO J03 O CA
y , MLLJ P" ry
o nd�jlJ� c I WJf'" z ZOO "-. O �z Lu
ct�
p ►--� O Z 0 W
• Q`
i ' w � W Z p Q !- • Q
LLJ [Y► O "
J ` J LU C3
1
• �n ��I�` QO -i LWLODC4 -j O
NI_ �-+ � pW WZ J (AO ~
3Q aIUD Jm �
r"+O W Olqr O W ~ .-, 3 W N
F— F— U)cm 0 Li-
Z
' I W ~ QW0 O WpZmJ
•EI�! ` � S (n02UZZmCnW � Z ~ O �
v vd � M0JWQO Q
ZQ -JuW I h- wto
ZU-1p = "• :X � . W W 2W
;4 II m <1uj Lo W0 .., mMF- o
-096ff`
II�ii1l7��I�IIVr(1IIN,
y
f,
oZwwCo
F- c) nLLZ .
¢ ", ?
F— � U-) Y
W 7 CL CL r t
U.. � ¢ O ..
LU
CL J f
O m Q W
J � W -J
V♦ CL CL
U c { \ Q \ c
L.)
Wcc
in p Cn w
F- LLJ W F- O O ® •, U
O
..� W
F— Q Q Z V
Q Cn O Z
J wmw � Q LU Z W
cc W (n ILO
F— Cl W Q
r• ¢ a3u- CL1C.
ea �7 � --10 � £ v voD � D
aLI- M -n D — azmz .
-no m = r -4 •� LO
mM — mr = r-
X ;0M v •...
6-4 X v DD
SL ovCZ - �4mMD
m -4 ;0- a
SL Nv � Zmmx cnm .. vm
+c � O WD `~ DG? � CZJ? Ijf�"
ati � o --� ZmD
Ccncnz
CD � m
�. r -4M- m � Z
D
4p ;0m6.4Z
r: 20 ODm 3rmCn mZZGZ
a D T1 m D r C7
1
till M � DZmcn om ►.
:� � Qz -43 = . � xz
3 m 0Dt7
Z ZZr -� � m £
M � o -0cnc) -4r Amo = _
ss cocncn = vcnCO --�-
ov co
4 m ---I pcn
=
�cTa C F ` Z C? (n m m 0 m
D � mcnr-
m mC) rDco
o" oDv.. vD � CZD
"C C m b- H C-)-
LO cn C-) 0 Z m mcaZ ;)z
oo -r A. Mmmu Lmc-) cn
a
�On paa
3 tL
M
rsn
i
1
� T
cm ZN L11C7pp
Z Z W � .-. p " 7� Q J
pQpCn Z � cl r..� W
_ � F— O
r, OQz QW QO ZOL) •
W
ONS O a_ ) �, � WZULL
mQQ z. Q Os m {1J '
LLW LU L)"'� = L) < N F- J
OZmLli
m � O � arj cr- U) �
W = 3 W W
� U -j Q Cn CA F C3 F- F-
Z = Q Z Cn W LL p W
CD ".'
W O O Q C.J �� CL
co
WCnUU F- mwQ �- Q "'
W F-
t� Z ZCnr = X =
¢ QEF- Z L) -i . 3 � wo
QQ � m '-' c) a- W oLU
Q = m _ <r -iQQ Q QO
Qto tOW U = U FO- :> CL
W JZCL C] QQ W
'Z"' ¢ I~- 2LLJ(D W F-Cl � W ~ � LLI C)
co
J F-
' ZF- W to go ;O ?- O p F-
co [r O U O to Q O J J =
= O W O O Q n' -j W = co
f' OF— GU
W3ZZZZ • � xoz • w = w
QW u. o ¢ F- W 0alLn =
DoM -� mZm '
r r Cl) D Z ...,
D v o 0-4 c) a) cn
camcmn a '... = vim
teM- ai
Z mo °0ccnnr-
1-� c m v -q m -
�
Z £ .. NrM
mv � D ,... vnr0
M omZ� � �
M o -�
C m Z Z D N = o
� -N-� yr = -nc j
fv� r rm -
M � -1
�a c ~ m � mn
�ZnMvNc� D "'I
CC Zz3Z -�vZ
En cn
cor � co1D
Z '"' ^ w3> ED
C=l Lr) O r- r r =
Z- -< zmmmm
C �
..i
i
N
r
CD
Q - FAT Rmi
w - _
�Z o to - LL. 0 C5 W p W
O -i Z m Z m
Z 2
M � � W ot: _— O .-. .-,
W W W __ zOp f_- J
LIL U- W `� i .O� CA Cl) J Q
O Q ^ m CJS (rj OC Q W Ln
LLJ
Z
1 LU W J LO p ~ CA H � ---fi r
'°- pC O Q -j `� ' p w w CnCD
T a ( ONS ►-� Q � W CLW wC3
i. o j _
ZOWFW " j� i'� YOF" O � = O_`
V = J W Z ~
z = Z m W ¢ ao W
Cn La A _ 3 LL LIJ
p
CIO _ W Z
V♦ H J >- .. ~- t7
W � ►-�
Q CD
0 Z ¢ m � �, P" .rZ W
W � I�. W m O L) ?- W
W ® UOWQ I � F- C3 Z
p� LLJ Lu CL
2
F- C3 LLJ
X Q p C
2 Lr) W
¢ � m<IF- IIII ql. s VS Q
2
CLW p
'F' ]
W
Q UCn ..r' : Qa W OLL' - <Z �
Q I m �] Z Uf— � O —
£ cnaCD --4 � � am
� rmC-) m ~ -0cp -i
om •.• m
3` ZDD � mm
I� .-r � to -Zi D
Z DmoD
v
c) mrvZ -< m � 0 D.
.,, m o 0
`� ic) - n zz l
i vmmoos. wr- -nim
\
ocnmcZ m o
�� �� z � ~ m mM �
-i Z
CR ... Zm = mmD -0
A- � C: rnU) ;vvm
o = - ..
Enm oCO ma
G? m I N D r
= C7 c £
= Z =
Cb -* �
CbzL
All
i -
ca z Lu Lij
LO LLJ
¢ Z ti x t— Q• [C
w Q W
}� Q 0w
Z ¢ V m
Z .� Jl ,
41
Y ¢ mo
mm � �
p Z ¢ JJ Ly
w Z � w J Z O
¢ => ~' O a.CL Lo 1 Ocn .. , �•
IT LA- LLI
I— 3 0 fl. i
J = w ~ O F- 111
¢ F- Z Z W
3p0 � aW F- wLWi � 19L X I ; J NU
•=
U- i vo XwJ t 0 —
CZ � \3 Q,+ t c
w ui � Z p ui~• =:) s s =Q , o� f
oww ¢ Lu Llj L) ul_ ul I' II!; j -< E
< Up � Z Jp (xF- ¢ O. `IIacid
ui
I � it dJ Q �•
mon_ ¢ . � Qa_ w � !j' ilj� 1� ';
w � a. w � wZa� o u ltit
CL (o LU0- U- (n LL
c
LLJ 11
��
wwowpI
moZwJZ < F--o ZZp � Za- Zw � Q :
<L .. w Al -
V5 H H
Q Zx � 3 � w F- <r CLo � ~ ~ Ztr- vHw C
,• .-, W [1) U w Z W w J ¢ Z .-+ U
n- ZO � � .
W w p - Z <
W Z � J = a- ►-. �"� QwZ c] r0 p i
_ u F- Q �..
OJ ,-• ZJO Q W W ¢ CO r�-� D �J 0z h- � �(
W I— J ¢ t- " gym _ Q ¢ o0 ct:
L) ¢ a- ¢ t- pWw o � � � Hw o
CL Z Z , w W J
^' oto F- � oh•- 3 ¢ o ¢ o ¢ 2www w ¢ Q�
�+ w Z OL
Q
Z m Z � CL ¢ a- L) t- H m w w x
U w ,.., ¢ w � ClQcw o =1wCl 3 =o = cnQ `b �
0 Z Cn o_ Y p_. lw L) ..L F- X-J
LLJJ O C:) (n Z t- vj Z C1) L J
WZ W W >- Q C7
4 Lr
W D O Ln Crl Q O cn O CL W .-, O m O --� W
CL
¢CL ¢ Z cr = <I co 0 0: ~ >- 'ZL W = ap = 0 3w � ` wow =
U w �--� Cn W � H f" <r ._. ►-• W U ` Q' �Y F- U
Cf) W F- F- --+ '"' 73 (n w Z = .1 .• C.7 W
JUa- LLa_ V � Q3 ¢ a. �n mhW- UCLCL Uto- Q- F-- -J �--
vc-) coom
C — co � � .
� � m
om —� �
r ;. m
i„ mD (nM
— D p
=�
CO) OZ -4Tt
Zv � o
^� G m
£ � Ty
rr
G
n
m m r
=�. z ; r
D D ap
Dr .. m
10cnZ1>
D D Cl)
\ _ 0 'p r-+
ZCDZ
-I -C -4 v
�.�
a � O
ti-
cn -4
A
Cn2 O v -4 F-+ C -a "T'I G1
M • cao � c • mm = Zrmo • :] 96 __
7C O -I 0Mo cn O -D{ 0 � .,� � A � A
my cnm3m ►-• cnm -0 M00 -O �
� c -Im � � Z vZ � mD �
DD � �
-4m � v � 000 � cZ -4
mm
o £ m r c� Z '-,I
to
too o ~ D --� ovcmnm
D =
D ,a m D "'�
30 cnoc7Z £ off _ • o D
N v � m ~ r
V` cm c oZ
• � � m ;:o D Dv � to
M - mmaom m3DZD - r-
.f o cn r
D c� Z t1 0
M 0
� � tn � � ZoZ cnm
O v Ip Z tJ? m = C7
M CO D m £ m N = o M cn
Lo �v CO ... -40 -D-i 50nrm-
o --a r cn o --� -� m
C m � � r � —imD '-• M --4
v COM00MMZM r = MM -� mm
rmcnmcn,- v
1 �
i
LL1 � pp
L.L3 V1 Z
ct W O L)
f—
cZ F— p W
W W p O
F— U c3 p 3
QQZV :;
CX z_ W 1
WU `� a
0
Q O
Qm
�;� �
W QZF... , .
W .-. O
<1a—
CD
J ¢ _ i �
O QO
z = WQ::
Y U) W C7 W W
Q W QD
}
n C7 2. OWcrU
W
'-� 3 F— WO
oo � D £ cvtn --IcnZ £ oc'-) £ cn £ 3 minDcnnc or m -0 -ux
_� m �-• m � mooc ► MoZ = cn -4 - Z r .
--� m= -I r co ci � v 3 =v D m cn C-)
Dm = o r 2mcnv = r 3 -v roa •-• o � Z
v' "rtDDr cn --4m" � m � rZ --m = eco M £ �
mZ - -IDvC- mx cmcn cn -Co3aoD -I c� D
No ; m oo = m = v � T -4 oomZmm � £ -< - m mccnn� =
vDZ M 33 � cn ... m M -4 -� mm � rm v m
D m ` .,.,, n .-. Dr � nZ m 6-4 � Q ` r- cnDZ ; -I �
OCZ m � vmmz --� Dr-?XnM (n v � -� Doo = mZ o = m
'-� � = zW -1 � --4 Ncon £ Z -. m '� r V � cno � m
mmoo � Dm � Do u1" mm �7Z m -rComr o � c
tD r
� � --=iZzv000 = crt, cnmoa� m � � mm moo = m -oar
zZovZCN-� � �', £ D mrr- b3i � -n -tZmDm Czv
o � o -0mm mmcn" � m -I � nnmoD � �. vzo
b � m � mZ" m v � mm mmz � m" m � � "-�
vov c) Im � � v ;u D -� IC -0CDof
£ -'om D -0 r rcQ D -nZ Dm
= n c v = o C J> --7 C Z v m
m � cv. -0 S-4 r- b-4r-- omumi0-4 Z � Z = --� � DmN
G7 G7 oo3m" mD m to E: m v cnm
ton cT-� -Icn -=.iZcor, r- a) con � Z C-) M- ocn mr
'-' C -I ooZZ" v .-.
mo � ►-• DDm - ZrDD D --arc -i -• 3
CmZr- rZZv mrzor- Z = or- mZ0000v •-- .. .
mm -imr- a) c7 -< n c n MMOMMM -< mv cnZ --4
= m c o
r
~ -DGmNJ
f� L 3m =
�-- mvm
CD Z e
£ �
...,
C o 0
to
� D
m �_ r
co
LU
c•
W
as a =
V O
CC V.
Q Z
_ Z W
-- CO)
- LU
>
F- WLL• ZO `OJ J ••
r" U co • "<: UJLLJ Z f_ Z L
F-
U)
JQt'- W W � ¢ H Z � U¢ a: <r �
.-. LLQ .-. OC � W m ..LO m W O U H LL Q U
♦R OUr, OCts Ouj O ZF- Z = h- ~' W = O �--
v _ �_ _
Z
�. CL
W O - Cn > jmF_" CtJ } zt2' S
.-, O 4 W Z N � = J W O m O U
F- O W O F- U F- ¢ L) (n LL j � <I: Z
F- Cn O .Z• Q
W u' ? O ¢J W JW OF_ JOO -> = m
D
-j a: SOW -J IM ..WJ Jc� F _
_ Q H O LL
v W F-
� W N 3 P" 3 F- a— U)
Q � W JJ � pF- � W � J = ¢ O ~ O
U Om 'r F- J � UVIY OmUL1.. UQ F-
Q o W .-, 3z � � LW � (n <I: < U—j
W W =
= F- m � T m to F- � Lu F- Lu pp Q
UCiLU CL 7 �Z � n LL C] ZQ W ¢ QOD Z
Z
CJS W
Q V Z p D 17 Z _U Q.' C] J co W Lo F- CL
� Q C] U O ui O O W = F- O Q Z O J U U W U •
•
to � toO = � •-, WF- OO ¢ .J. W LLJ Lu F- C3 IOL D. ¢ .m, Ca (3C]
Q LU Q m Z O Q W O = Q [Y U O 0 � 0 2 W LI J uj
m
¢ t11 Jmm F- C.. titnF- mm ¢ F- F- tnw _: p
v v
£ n -� �- c� cn = ►-yovcnr aoZ -awDto -I ;uv -4ZD cn
Dornm ;a mZC= C3 = coo = cmz = om -c0Z Z �
r- Z m -� D -I � D � o --� m -4 -lo J � m ov� -u -I -C or r- C3
cnm D -D-Im -�[ mvrmm m -n -ir = r -n ►-. m r' m -n
Dc m ;u 6-4 � Qcno v ,.., rp MU) p v
M 33cn
3m � c ►-� o -IUr
0-4 mmDm rD- bo � D � mm £ ZoDm cn a, Zm
Zvr -4 tnOD -G = cn � rC '� r-- 0Zr = n � C 3 -4
o -v
� m � v... MmD0D.-40 m �� v � � mZC= = Z `~ m � Zr „� ...
D � � 9
C7 Cp7m )> C � Z Cra p a) -n v , � _ = Mvv -DIS o
Nm :a Cmz -� maN omc rm � c � m ' _ � zr.
C') Z Q Z o o .4 F- D Z m D
mc •-. Z D -4m � ;o � oo -lo cn 6 � p � �
r. _ -4 Z 'Q
c� m � mC') Zrco i -IZorc- r � c� r- M DC7 -� v mm
z o v � v mm � Zv rho mr -vZm = ND
T p0 - Z D r 4 D C m o O C cn
Z z
cz+ -r1 -n v
to -4 _ � 0Z 0 m m O � 's1 ... --� --� Z v � Zm
-° D 3D = D � Z � o` aZ � -ao � m ZZ £ o m
m �. 'o
� r '� = mmo� nr � cn = m m CD n cn zm ;u
£ O 3 3 v m �-+ Z7 o D C.
-I m m .-. 6-4 Z cn m -i -� m --� o c -I -I m o
maom m - C) D Z -tcnm z % CI m = c')
-im3 cn = 'vZm -iv Z -Imm -i -Iv7mv - m --( D
C
m
� 1 y
4
� I ► n
� I
O
N
N m
o 7c' S y
O CD rf
to 3
3
ca s CD -
•� m
m CL
to i v C
�o
a
o
p
a X
O
N
q !
I
L---j
1
Lax 19c) ,
C LU
-j Q , I I
L�
F- r-
W Cn LU 2
¢
S.
_ 0 —
LZ cl::
UO Z �--i
- _ � -- o
U LLl p Ley
J = p W 1
0 LU
N3 OLL � M
cn `Y O c m _
0CL1211
o (~r4i � "
F- Q t-• LL
LLI O = C (n
O ajZ U O
e
L� ►
C� ZO W p }
Z
^' U
L
p J
. O
C_.
O O
pmU LLJ1— m _
C
m n cz I
r- Z = .
mvoo mr- � o ' 3>
Z C: C.r- m D -0m �, I cv -n
Zmvc-) � � DN-q =
'-a o —� c-� r
7
pm- moo mZ '- �-- m j - > ; Z = j
C-) r- � = WDD + - —4mzm i
"'� -103 'vD a3m D -� n -4 m
m ... o
Dovv - mD � om
DOZY ,£ vZr 't7 I C £ Cp
inn m -4 � � -4no
cn CO
c C p � -^I = m C .r
M =
b" D � mr-� rDm - — - = mom
or mMo
o0 3 r m
o Dm ,0 v -
=?7 -n-� zL rmmmz — � —Dice £
0 v p 3 = D
_ Z m
m c m _
� -am -`4 o -4rvri40 m
�
v m r D
mcomc- v -�CDm s = m =
m m --i
Cb
t:ss
r:iii' ,•ars;•
i i•ss•t••
;• .........
t s i !!i•
A
�i
N
N
Z WO LL. OW Cl
UIX W ¢ UF- Owl JZ
F- o � � w w ¢ m
Z '•) ZOXCL Z ~ w <u �4F¢- � Cn
= 2 � t- ¢ I Z2 " qU Z Z2 F- IZ
� Lt0- O ZZ OZLL LL. W WF- ¢
.-. ZoWo .-. WO a: -j � � . Zo
3 2 U) Z WO F- O m W W q U) Z
U)
J ~ wY ui ALJ a_ O p
OLLj in
ZF- ~ p < Ol.1 � 3 F- LJ
U V _jO co
o m q � Q U
1=uj U) = zal ULL ¢ � Wm
C) =D UCnm (n 0 LLJ = Q SO < mLU
LO U') x = U o LL F- U ¢ F-
mWOU ~ �- LLOW O ~ F- �
CY3 wm F- Oaf- 3 � a = o
H F- LLJ vOtO- C3 w } qo m W ZJ o °' p t=ip ~
� �' oF- oo U ,i � oZ F- Cy- o Z w ro
Z in Z oo _ ¢ ¢ F- � F- m -
CL LLJ Li (n CD o � � '-' w Zoe Z � �
mgmw }- moi-, mcg � � oF- ►-� � o ~ ww
LL U J <I: -i Z } �-• W •-, •.-• Q ¢ O F-
I oZ CL F- cntn 11 CL L.) quJ <L
ELWO co OJpO F- LY Z W U .--4
' O = Z '-' <LlU O ?- O
• ZT- wClJ ¢ ¢ � mmLL. .. •- YUq
—' -0 En r
M f7
ao 202
n 3 V -4 m m c
mo -Xi � n � D = ccs � � D � _� Z .�
r- momm = M Zr
C: --c ►-� r --� � CO f � Z com Z
m o r m -4 Z D Z ■ m m r- c�
.r. 0 o c� o cn
C7M a3 -4
W0M (n IM
oorD m � D
D � Vmm "� � Z D r clr- r" ... . .
us � rZ -< mmv "� r �` t v -a "� rr ZZr-
6-4
v G)
_vc) or -`'- ZMm zz
� ZzD SSnncn W 0nD
0D. ;o Mm � m o °oc m oD C
D
rr-- o = m • mN � � � mZ
� c') NZ � 3 v tm- v_ � D CDC3
� � zc --4 Co-40 Z ;u 3 -< -0
M ;o am ooMm Z r-
0 - v my Z D -i D
T m --� c D .� 3 to £ cn
� Z.= co r- Z m --I c Z Z -a Z
3 cn ;Vv M- cn Z -n ;v
4
P � �
❑no
N
W -
�lui � tiq um i � I N
IIIIIII
AYiI
. j I I i t•7 ._ M 1 �i
'
l
•ifs t
.i-. 7 I � 1'IC7r_
w0- LLJ = 0 (nZS\
= tn ~ F- ¢ = 3tLZ --JcnCD � Nu� QZ
0 = W � = W W3Cn 2 [LW F— � w � C] ►-, OC
.--�
J tV C) cl F- = U W �, w Z CL F- J
= L.LJ 0 = CL� � w0 (nnq � Qo W[: XZ 3ZW0
CnF- F- 3 � JJ0 CLO WCLO �-TWO U ,"
Z W m F- � F- OF— c!, � 0 = W •
CnOCn
x m Z ,O.. = � v' ZO = L) <1: Lu J
w � Q N Z CD Q O W J O w m ¢ ~ Q
Q CL J Z � = � Z W �OCZ OQJ � � W ~ ir
LL Cn - O Q [� 0 0 ~' 9 Cn CL Q O 0 u, U X W W
= Z Cr (n (n LL � U � Lu -J U W CC Z O Q W W Q
= W
Cnwr•. W = QOO O W W 0 ►-. CrU JZ
= W O J Co Cr U W O S F- F- U F- I- Z O a-
u
C7OF-- J Q ..W= m W [r _OO C.0 C) O W =
Z IT }' O ~ --> C7N0 ~ UA OCL Cl Z UQ
O Q:: U [� ~ Z O Cf) O J C� C7 W X
JOS WJ L) Jco OC:) W Z ¢ OF- OCL Z � F" O
O O W O [r w Q W W Z S W O
00 L) C3 ZF- 7-rSS = _ w to W ¢ OmCn .. .J� CtzcoF- U
CO (ti F— F— m Cn o o LL (n Z to � to ..
.-, O O F- • Cn Z J Z
Cr U W J O .-. LO
O J J U Q «-+
W
.. .. � 3Cr) Cr ZCLF- Qf- Wtn C cWmc0
- #
-n
-n
z- m
L� �` c� c`nZzv oncor
C7 CD
:> r C:) M
I �-9
m{= -� ZoC-) 5 C
y'i�� �►` . m S Z
,1 1
o � nmw CIO
t z
N _ cn cn
m = _
\111\ r me ova z
T� M C M D
a � � 2cnm � -anco m m
r r- 000m £ rnD
r ;o 'n ;D M Z • v
td
-0CDS -U � DopD
mcgDm • cnrn � Z �
� DSrrvm DC ) m .,.. -D-I
-- - cp m --4 C.) C") Pz -D
_ n,- -I
DcDnoomcnm � m � °ror- o = _
m
v ' ---- to c £ oD m
� v £ Zcn .., 300
•• - n D
3 M o r m Dv, D
1 m ;a °° o � m m � m
�
M U) D
m
C -I � - c cnn fr --nm
Z: o Z
co m D co -� -� n o
no = 3 = n _ � o
co Cl) ;a mm C) Sc
r- LO mM � Z vD DmD I
mSSmo --4 r-
D Z C ..
-n r- m cnm
�cmtrZvv � = o Mo i
3coz ... 0 m £ � -
m ~ T z c DM
cncoo --� U) co --4
Cocn3 � -C- v � 0Mm
1
Mw �wwMo N
OQ] ZO JOF..., I CU) ZinLu
W -iC3 :> UO
O Ix w..d.. -� !-- Cn W W F- W W
Q Fui-
_ J O J N
U1110ZJmQ ® -D 4TWw "' 3
W nU., m } W , a
'7 (n P" QtZ h
Z p U- o E O eo U t)
Q
-
c� o O
— w
.. � Q � W W w . F- �
Cn � Zm • � oM C7 C'3 moo
0
oo � F- �� o a
0
n ►- 33mm -4Dco DD •.• DD
> D D-4cn - da m ... . � = Z - Z -4 Z -
moozC +-. cnc) m v
6-1v cn
• ;o i � Crm � -0zm (n -0rn
-U3 v = 17vDz � ;o C � •-+ � �
OM ODM DZZGm - Doom = cnom
4LO roc m rmM 0Do {
r.. DmDr, -CD o - --4rtn Zr � o
� mmNm XZ mcg V � ►y ...
o D Zm CA
-I � rvvM � Dm ` mD
O � Zm D -40 :c
�
-
av0000 m m o m
Z
mNoD� m o � � �� Ncnm
m3 6-6
DD rZo -4 --1 U)
r" =
� cn me ,... cn
r C m CoD
.� .yD
> mcoocn 0In m � iivm
o °0 = '" o M o v o cn
'*� m "4mU) mm
= r__ rn D m
C-) MIV m � � = m irm, � c o
ARcn arm �_ '� r � m `.. Dv
cn0a) om3 r = -Ziv vZo
•.• vn
CD o z ..4
Z D
M % = tn —;I = m G7+ •-+ r
Zvcnm- cn m m v --;Imcn cnZm
1lj��7,111
i '� — m �
Ln
om
NO
9R
13
�-
135 -
�_ o
a O
o a
cy
n N �
3
fl G = S
n
tP e-
3
-
s ZS n
Y dR � 3 3�
N a� T
co
N
ww
■ w
wa
fill
,
i
V
t is
I �
W O W —i (x
m AWS
I— cn O (n O
Q W }-
Q' J
U a Co Q
LL O
LU a- 0JO
m LLO cn
.--.
o Z_ h.. LO
C3 cn < W
20 ~ tYF"
Cr10Q 9CL � _
7 Q U
O ti
O WO U U W
cn -
_ w LL
(n F- �, O •
W LO Q' W ~ _
cn
U � L OQCn r:
. � ~ N W O
O W .-.
W3Z LLovcn
a) as to — W W CD W W 3>
W C: -VC: - mcZc-� mm -•i
-
o r � � M r, M
x v � m -Dio m � vrn Drmri
G7D ;o
Crr. � v � = Q7 ''" � � 3 v r��
moo t� rm = � zo � omccnn V!
cnD mm o
cZmcnC3 ►- MZr- o nZn (n
CL cnr- oo m- m -0vmcrD ..q rn
_ Z
I . '~ o r CO D £ r m r
�., M Ncn3cz = oz 10 -4 Woc- Na rn D
m C)c � r rn
m '� � `� omc� £ mro
�.I m $ 'Vco �-- M .
= m pro = ' c c C C
.� DmD � ...,. vm v �
Z v `"' zZ c3r- cmnc
IV C') o En GI) CO D .-. M
cn cn z
co b r -I m �.
Dmm £ Cl) � Z � noc'�
� Mm D C
D
m .... m -a rzaoc�r'� � m --� z m
rvM- cn -lov C
` rn
cn
� � T
.o
CO
c�
z
z /A WL.LCnW �. WC WC= WF- O p •� w 0 w
�r c n n o � 2 woo 7 m >- m cn Z cn W Z 2 .
L � LZ QF- 2 CL � � OZ Q � = ( NO
QO ~ O OLLCn2 � C�
Oui AF- h-LLIpLLI� U > >' W SC'� p O (- WUJJ }- .+
Q "" O ¢ OF- OOQW UQOF-
O
�' ♦ 1 vQZ3p = Z � P" w � Z � = rte v
QV z p W Zit) LU p3 �-+ N o (n LO C1.) A W
O W Q F- (t) Q W W �-+ nQ Q �._ W O
UJ V � QLLj W = w...� 2 = � U 3 QQLU Q
Z Z Q Q '"' J L.Li Lu � LiJ O N- LL Lg t- "' W
Cc: LU
V U 1- VJ = >" LL 1-1 LL Q CL J LL. �j Q
F- ►-+ W W W O Lz W f (n
Z U O W W wZ W w 0 ¢ Q W 1 0 W O
W LU C7 2LL Z OZ L OJT '
F in W Z Q W LLJU
Q W W O Q' "J Q w to Ln Z O p m
z ~ `r) p -' = o "' "" - P" o
_ Q ZLLI p � QLL3QF- W pOMWh- W �
_ z •-. w LUIr F- mQF..
55 F- W H � LtJ0wz W Qcm --r QQ
G Z L) W Q O J QZ � J
Q p W ~ (nWUQ � F- QCL .-, 000'� p
U H 2 W U W CC W W
.z QOp W W QQO U) OLLOF-
CL
Y J QOU WS CZ] OC. x
NcnC7G7 -4
� Zmr" m
cC�� DD ... Z
cn
mm M-u -nomo Doo om = ZZzcmiccn £ m3> m � D aa)i $ rc- am
--a � mmX � . � .
mX � � mvo Mcn m � m v -Ism -1 � c-� CZ ov -Dir' ro- Cl
m — M0 -u c -i = mv = Dmmv � cn •-• r-
n `�' -4 cn I7
ciZm � ... vD "{ ov ocn -00... m _�C ccn0
v .... ZD DmD oo = nkocn -0 = Dm 3Z0 � cZ
D = -1 cn � mo m m -0mZv mv � rv '"' Z
--� o -n �. ZoZ -nm mmvc) C
-nC) mZ � C'� �c rt- 6..4 Z6-- �.. m ^� 0t4cnD mDcnm
C)
imn cmnmz Q C") a) Zm C')Z ;o ^ .. � c1 ►ri
Cf) mm = r- m
� mmmDZ � or vv ... � -0ZCnovcn C) m cn O
'~ o 3 cn c m
r o .-. mv3m � -0Z = v6-4 Z -4r- b., IVzo comm 'Z
mo -Iv Z v -0 '-' XomZ = (- rZm z - -4maz
oar m -.� ;a Cl) me mm r vZ --4Z 0 � v �
o _ Z o � rar- ov mZ C cn m
.. � NcnDcD-l � 000 � D � v � Drnm � cvn �m� � m � -� = m � v d
-Z.i � NNrmricnDc Dr mm = m � m � moo m � � -.�
o3 = m cnM -lCnr -am 3 mmmm mmn vin D -n _O
m v me mn cnMo = -� o o -4 ..,
ro Zal ;v zoocnomD3 D �
t., cctn mo -� -iZ vac cnc� v3 cn Z -v
--� -.� _cn --� � � 3 � mr -0m -• c. m nvo � �
c vZ � .n Dv _omZNvo �-• ZDV Dm o
co
&" saoc � o -o-� o m m mDZ � -4 Zro- -Dimes m. D �
0mmD -4M U)CD -4 mm cn v -� c�nZvOmm �nmZD � a) Zv
v -� r oZvm CWD
v_
a
CA)
• o N
\ �\ LU
< < �
ry f� o
o
W
a
Q LU
D CAO it 1- (n co •.Q' W`p
LU g=) ¢ O � •-
- JfllUlw = Z -` t
< LuF- = F- Q
¢ 0 Z U 1 -
O O Z O O .-. W f...
LU
W QFQ- Z L) C) k -=-_
V/ --
� Cn U
(n oF- QCO2 QZ _ - : L �_
V W Jw F- W ~ UO ` Q
m m �-+ � CO .-CD F-
OQ >- OL
-
mQ (nW Jw -
J .� Cn ,.7 w .-. U •
W Cr LLJ C3
some CL ZWOm F- wm to ; -..
C11 JZ Jam- JC7 Z ZOO. -4
Q
J -
c7
Q � W -
w Z Z o
D O
M ►-. O
W _.
F- Q z. .-
.-. .,
(n 3
� . Cl) iz
Z W O m cn m
O --� O
O ¢ �.
W Q r J - s
(� O
f' F- W W
J � � O Z
�- O LL r- .-. W
QJ �. m UZdOUZ -
W
W -
3 0 -
G U O
F-- W ¢ Z -
r
2 Z
r U ¢ CA W
W ¢ U
Z p J � to to m
W W U
U _
� • • Ott LU WY U WZ0U- -D r � .. � si �►=
� QF- GWf— J [Y] W ►-+ F- --JLLD (�
► IMP ►
..
qp
► . ►
411P . . ► . ••
IMP . as .. . ►
► qp
• •• ►
•
aw
•
►
• qp If '
► ► _
qw
on
f� �-' S --mss �YYt`-rl�tr'�`�<�t�t�'� ��• ► • ►
r�'.•�v�'x•��: }} iii�`��3"`�'ra;�"a1 1 2�t,'-3�``'� ��'4
e'`•`.e_>3:f'z� �ao r.0 y►s1~.
�Xt„�^��rs ��a!►l'. •, 1* -'r
-`.s-.r $•+tom-`�y ; 'l.���S ?,���1.;��$.� +r�;,w•r,�
IP-
ie-
i-Ta _ .)t'T•fes. 1j �.1 �' sr��}_w _ � h'
Utvr iZ-..ia\`�_fv�j,,ttt 'f• ��J�r �. �•�a 3r�rti��•�_',`��`;•Ilam � _
:ice%{'%rl;lt��+'� f. P ^•� Malmo �'••s.�.s �'*%,E: J.cNL�
T 7
hl
•-�. •fit�� � � �_�:��3
fi• ; �z_3 � s=
yo a T it
i
♦ i ����+3'. µ f,�
` ? _ le •w
S
z.
��..ee a.t.��gT• � t�
v 'a 3ty�`�'y`y� s's fc 7 �r'�. ��f.f. y i'•Y ��� � "
�, ,.fir •ger�r.�r�"""' 7.t.�.
���•s� '� to -rot � ���" � � i -� �fY �..,��
z a
y y p ►.
+� i `� r• ; fir. l✓•• j
N
i�a � _i t.rf�'i pt}-i!y, � _+xFl+�pCl �•
��1 ���; s .ice ,•,. �"T� ���� °'."{
r
M6-4 mDmm � � mcnD
� nvoZ C-) v ...,
CD cnal o
'vg� m � D z � .-. Zc
Zrr" o `� CD D 0m3
vcn
vcnto '{ mm cnror coZ6-• 'p Cl)
;og� m o o o D r '. � m
� fl3 �rnD= � -+ oom rrcn C"
... CDS «.. .y -cmm
z 3 m Z o o m Z v m
cZ £� m -0 C= -Uvmmo
t4 � z = nZ, r £ m ; C) ED
CD
� m to r
` m n
mm � cn � m -a m cn � Z
m 6-4
Comrn mm m0cn mz -Dty
Z r o o m m
Z —7
-TI to --� -{ m
`° NI c) ovovcc•)y' o o
OmoD -i � m� mm = � -n r
-NIP r = v cn Z
t •:P sem,? _
t ;:�� •;� t 111 �
R r'��•{ '.fir/�;iw�:/�� I .
d I
co
cor CIO
'030 1
o
o = y .} ry. i e Q O
CIP-
17
w.. 1
uj F QL 1
UJ
cc
cn
M CA LL LU -,(n -• tt� O (n W � - W2 � m }- >- ¢ WLY_
` O2 � � CAOQ = F- = CDWL7 mF- OQF- .J = \
W � F-- W M = F- ` F- LWLZJ r � � w o
C3 C) LU , < ZZO CO L) L'� � ~ WQQ ¢
W WF- W < uj
OZ cl W W NSP" UUZI~
O LL
n a.< p z U j � W n F- � , Q W Co
O Z ' O W }- J F� Z '`' Z W = U m 0 ""' EL W
Y = J
<r
-J � OZJ <L � O � .-. ZQWCL FO_ ZF
S CO
D: F- i1 m _Z ¢ U 2 LL F- d.LU _ � ` t!] U M J LLJ U j
¢ ~ ¢ Zt1- C7D .`-� O I Z .. CD P" W JOO
W
OL :3 W W P" _ "3 <c- F- Lu
wC] U ¢ O "" OUW Zr� Fuj ~- � .� J W F- U- 3 LU C3 L)
LLJQLLI . O
O 3 ►-+ L7 O L j m C ¢ co `� F- Q 2 O Q � W -J
2w W "' OAU O �+ L'1LL- F- JW C)
�. m F-
W W JF- ON -� ¢ ~ � � LL Z CL F- J � QLO J
O j � = OZOz = (15 � O F-LLJ ZZ C¢.1 <c < Lu � V � tWiF-' Z¢
m T � .o < Q W �- U = o Q Q LL C3
O m ¢ ¢ f- CO = Ll. �' U D a. O O F- •-+ �- Q= ...� W LU ..,
W Y
Z Z Q F- O U J F- F- U x W = U O _ z F-
■ JNW O = 0` (1! 0 _0 � CLU-) 41 J = W = F- WWQW
r ►-• _ .-. ` O W � F- •.. J Z � cYZ O ~ 7rF- O O �N- F" U
7.,. Q3F- cn -icnaCwwY ¢ m DF- J L) ` G� W
wiz
Cl (nmm � o .. ZZm0 -o1 � umivM �
-
mmZ vc-� -Cz� a ►-� o
--Im .,� ZD v : Ennio o .... m
c -4 Dr' my -4 = cnZmo -l -1 --4 nzEODM _ mmc = o
£ a) Zr -4;0 aim D -1 � mmm _0Gi > 6-d T .Zlmrr- mm
-4 c X � = -.4M r- M. mD � Cl cn �
= _0m -1 ,� _ -4 cn a7ZmM -4D vo to
:v
co -
:vM 3 � Z mcg mrnz, � --� C-) ZD
mCl DZ r = nor -� � Z D Zm 'C = Dmm
C7 C --� .r D Z p r •.• Z cn —I -�i 7C
--� � oZcn � m m � mo �-.
DmZ C) cr- DoW r- mm = 4 o � ...4 ovmZ
440 .:. v &-d m m Dcn COrr.cn D cn to- -4 -
m -I c ,.,. = Z CO
v zo -nrmr .nD � ro � C = � v` mov' m CO c� oDD
D ~ � --1 D Cv � CZ � D aC r-
Z --1
ry m m y = -Cn 2m- o � Dm = � � ran n = mr
r� ~ M ..rZcoomm my Dr -ImD b-dCDco
CymD � D z � D cCt) 3mmZO = vD 6-4
=� Z _*stn v ' ►� Zv mZcr) mmD oD �' D b-4
m O
ZD3 �oEO ''' momcn Z � m � �' m � "i � oo Cf)
v o -a v r- c
r- :z mD c DZ = -rCD z = v Dm = m DDr - i
m
• r- cl3 � Da3 ZomDo o -ivm0 Zmaom
r -< vr -a vZ Z -n m- ;u ;v vxmv
W
f
',1
,-Cl
� W
W c Q,
(i L_
Co L
L� —
C� ,u
Q L L
0 IJ J`
U) L L
0
U IJI
a u I11 L L
x L L ill U Q
D 'T; to ,U X T1 I_rl
�-- W 2 I_rl .Ti c r.4
UW - C = ,i, --
W F- W = ,1
F- LL
r-� - LU
_ LC
U L L ,j, L L 'Ti 1.
CLQ O ,Ti Cl ,y ,Ti L .—
Q U I-rI ~, _ _ LL f—
() W co Z U7 W LL >- O C) >- O
D - F- yaC 01- F-- Z .JX
Z Q _jW
CL I., UJ L Z W G
Q Q
W UJ o IW W x W Q O
.� U _?
OW � UF- ?- W1: J W = ¢ W
WW -" OQF- CL u ZZF-
Cr F- b" 0 W W O Q Ww
BZW -1 U = zM UU) Y 0
LL 4T Z UOQ � '-' d
0 [�
W V QOCr O2
U) .-� (n f- Z �
O LIJJ .-. W LL- U ¢ W W ~ } 0 G
CC CCJ LL F- � Z F- Q Q
z a J
LL W U) QQ � � ~ � � �Q' tFI1ZQ'
V � 07 � OP" � Z o 07 w O ►-"
O NQ2 z -' LLWW � OZLWi. O 0J ¢
F- Crp � C, Q LO ?-
OWZ .J CCWU
Q '-, W GZF CCO -J � F- LO0-4 0 J SF- W
W QQ LL W � 10wcy- -JO ZQZU LL. UW
►--. .-,
0 rv2oU1 tL 33 Qwa ` W LLFW- H
z '-+ Z W_ (!) Z = Wct
= Z _tUj 01-
08 CL
UO ►-yl.1JF- p0 �_ WQ : ~ O � W U.� CCC.) Z
M LF-- 2 Z �. ZF-- ZS ►-� W O W W dtYO
Z D M F- - Zi a Q <I F- J 3 U cr Q w O Q U
Dom " c� DQ cncncn c� rD � v3v Dc� D o
Zm ~ cm cno0
C � 3D0 ocncn _r ~ t) r- r- tn3v -iU) rn
mm
En (j)
xmm -n -im � � mcD -< .-.
£ -1 Z --I 3 3 O --a O 'o Z ►� Z m o 0 "n
A om I mo Ztntn ZOO Z �, m -Di --� Z -n rn
�,
_ _ m ~ ~ M ~ ~
r3 3om c7Cc D - D � omm mcg
-n :I> z r D ► oD �.- mD ~ � O D � rn
oZZ 2 m rrrr %o r *-0 Dm �- Dm ,, v Z
ZDm m --ID -nm � � D p --� ~ co 0 m
..., rm M omZ aZm .rbc w �m, m � r
D � D --i ;o (n m c ~ cn b-4
rn
C. r-+ N Z
r " D 0
rm - DD � m 3 � m Z
'gym ZD .OND �' oU � LO D
r m Ln0r o ►� Q ~ Z -07 . \ D
.Tj _
... 3 � O wDo co � mU D SO o
Ln
•p m m —1 M O � � L z co C
OD Z m ►-� Z "0 rq ~
Cnz Mp 0 '~ OD 0D0 ZD O
M ZD Z rX Or- X rn
cn
Dv ►- DTc 30D
� ;u o Z -4 WDZ � r -� zo�o Xan
� 0 Dm -< 0 o -� ZD civ "
m
0 0 m D 0 Z 0 Z ~ C f
D O Qr � m Do Zmc
Z c .. o 000 � mmv Dcwx
m � v m " c -n ►-
m 0 r ,o -V M r
Zr- D r -Di Ln ;U;U CO
c� r �• O ,,,� O D
Drmm m D mLD D Z � m
m --�
,T v1� -i Z Z 0 D I
o Z D Z D O 0 1
Z ~" X D D v M m
\ r C-1m0 mLn0 m
SOD —{ nrm Zmm o IC
co0 ZDV m X CD Z
mm m
cnmm Z SOO rvZ £ £
Cfl .
MEDIUM TREES 25-40 feet
Acacia baileyana . . . . . Bailey Acacia
Ailanthus altissima . . . . . Tree-of-Heaven
Albizia julibrissin . . . . . Silk Tree
Eucalyptus sideroxylon Red Ironbark
Juglans species . . . . . Walnut
Olea europaea . . . . . Olive
Prunus caroliniana . . . . . Carolina Laurel Cherry
Quercus chrysolepis . . . . . Canyon Live Oak
Quercus ilex . . . . . Holly Oak
Sambucus species . . . . . Elderberry
Zelkova serrata . . . . . Sawleaf Zelkova
Y
DROUGHT TOLERANT PLANTS FOR ATASCADERO
LARGE TREES 40 feet and higher
Acacia decurrens . . . . . Green Wattle
Acacia melanoxylon . . . . . Blackwood Acacia
Cedrus atlantica Atlas Cedar
Ceratonia siliqua . . . . . Carob Tree
Eucalyptus leucoxylon . . . . . White Ironbark
Grevillea robusta . . . . Silk Oak
Lithocarpus densiflorus . . . Tanbark Oak
Pinus canariensis . . . . . Canary Island Pine
Pinus halepensis . . . . . Aleppo Pine
Pinus radiata . . . . . Monterey Pine
Pinus pinea . . . . . Italian Stone Pine
Pinus sabiniana . . . . . Digger Pine
Quercus agrifolia . . . . . Coast Live Oak
Quercus chrysolepis . . . . . Canyon Live Oak
Quercus douglasii . . . . . Blue Oak
Quercus ilex . . . . . Holly Oak
Robinia pseudoacacia . . . . . Black Locust
Zelkova serrata Sawleaf Zelkova
�r
DROUGHT TOLERANT PLANTS FOR ATASCADERO
LARGE SHRUBS 10-18 feet
Acacia baileyana . . . . . Bailey Acacia
Acacia b. 'Purpurea. . . . . .Purple-Leaf Acacia
Acacia decurrens . . . . . Green Wattle
Acacia d. dealbata . . . . . Silver Wattle
Adenostoma sparsifolium . . . . . Red Shanks
Aesculus californica . . . . . California Buckeye
Arbutus menziesii . . . . . Madrone
Arbutus unedo . . . . . Strawberry Tree
Arctostaphylos glauca . . . . . Bigberry Manzanita
Arctostaplylos manzanita . . . . . Common Manzanita
Baccharis viminea . . . . . Mulefat
Calliandra tweedii . . . . . Trinidad Flame Bush
Callistemon citrinus . . . . . Lemon Bottlebrush
Ceanothus arboreus . . . . . Feltleaf Ceanothus
Ceanothus crassifoius . . . . . Hoary-Leaf Ceanothus
Ceanothus cyaneus . . . . . San Diego Ceanothus
Ceanothus impressus . . . . . Santa Barbara Ceanothus
Ceanothus 'Frosty Blue '
Ceanothus ' Ray Hartman'
Ceanothus ' Sierra Blue '
Cercis occidentalis . . . . . Western Redbud
Cercocarpus species Mountain Mahogany
Comarostaphylis diversifolia . . . . . Summer Holly
Cotoneaster lactus . . . . . Red Clusterberry
Dendromecon harfordii Island Bush Poppy
Dodonaea viscose . . . . . Hopseed Bush
Elaeagnus pungens . . . . . Silverberry
Eriobotrya deflexa . . . . . Bronze Loquat
Eriobotrya japonica . . . . . Loquat
Eucalyptus macrocarpa . . . . . Desert Malee
Y
r '
DROUGHT TOLERANT PLANTS FOR ATASCADERO
SMALL TREES 15-25 feet
Aesculus californica . . . . . California Buckeye
Arbutus unedo . . . . . Strawberry Tree
Callistemon citrinus . . . . . Lemon Bottlebrush
Callistemon rigidus . . . . . Stiff Bottlebrush
Ceanothus arboreus . . . . . Feltleaf Ceanothus
Cercis occidentalis . . . . . Western Redbud
Eriobotrya deflexa . . . . . Bronze Loquat
Fremontodendron species . . . . . Flannel Bush
Heteromeles arbutifolia . . . . . Toyon
Lagerstroemia indica Crape Myrtle
Photinia serrulata . . . . . Chinese Photinia
Punica granatum . . . . . Pomergranate
Quercus dumosa Scrub Oak
Rhamnus alaternus . . . . . Italian Buckthorn
Sambucus species . . . . . Elderberry
Schinus terebinthifouius . . . . . Brazilian Pepper Tree
LARGE SHRUBS 10-18 feet continued
Feijoa sellowiana . . . . . Pineapple Guava
Fremontodendron species . . . . . Flannel Bush
Heteromeles arbutifolia . . . . . Toyon
Jasminum humile . . . . . Italian Jasmine
Juniperus species . . . . . Juniper
Laurus nobilis . . . . . Sweet Bay
Lithocarpus densiflorus . . . . . Tanbark Oak
Mahonia higginsae . . . . .
Nerium oleander . . . . . Oleander
Photinia fraseri . . . . .
Photinia serrulata . . . . . Chinese Photinia
Plumbago auriculata Cape Plumbago
Prunus species Prunus
Psidium guajava . . . . . Guava
Punica granatum . . . . . Pomegranate
Pyracantha species . . . . . Firethorn
Quercus chrysolepis Canyon Live Oak
Quercus dumosa . . . . . Scrub Oak
Rhamnus alaternus . . . . . Italian Buchthorn
Rhamnus californica . . . . . California Coffeeberry
Rhus integrifolia . . . . . . Lemonade berry
Rhus ovata . . . . . Sugar Bush
Sambucus species . . . . . Elderberry
Schinus molle . . . . . California Pepper
Schinus terebinthifolius . . . . . Brazilian Pepper Tree
Tecomaria capensis . . . . . Cape Honeysuckle
Xylosma congestum . . . . . Shiny Xylosma
.� v _
- DROUGHT TOLERANT PLANTS FOR ATASCADERO
MEDIUM SHRUBS 5-10 feet
Arbutus unedo 'Compacta' . . . . Dwarf Strawberry Tree
Arctostaphylosdensiflora 'Harmony'
Arctostaphylos densiflora ' Howard McMinn'
Arctostaplylos franciscana
Artemisia tridentata . . . . . Big Basin Sagebrush
Atriplex canescens . . . . . Four-Wing Saltbush
Atriplex lentiformis . . . . . Quail Bush
Baccharis pilularis consanguinea . . . . . Coyote Brush
Baccharis viminea . . . . . Mulefat
Caesalpinia species . . . . . Bird of Paradise Bush
Calliandra tweedii . . . . Trinidad Flame Bush
Callistemon citrinus . . . . . Lemon Bottlebrush
Callistemon pallidus
Callistemon rigidus . . . . . Stiff Bottle Brush
Cassia species . . . . . Senna
(_ Ceanothus griseus horizontalis ' Santa Ana'
Ceanothus ' Concha'
Ceanothus ' Joyce Coulter'
Ceanothus ' Julia Coulter'
Ceanothus 'Mountain Haze '
Ceanothus ' Sierra Blue'
Cercocarpus ledifolius . . . . . Curl-leaf Mountain Hahogany
Chamelaucium uncinatum . . . . . Geraldton Waxflower
Cistus purpureus . . . . . Orchis Rockrose
Cotoneaster lacteus . . . . . Red Clusterberry
Cytisus species . . . . . Broom
Dendromecon harfordii . . . . . Island Bush Poppy
Dodonaea viscosa . . . . . Hopseed Bush
Elaeagnus pungens . . . . . Silverberry
Eucalyptus macrocarpa . . . . . Desert Malee
Feijoa sellowiana . . . . . Pineapple Guava
Garrya species . . . Silktassel
Grevillea ' Noelii '
Grevillea rosmarinifolia . . . . . Rosemary Grevillea
Grevillea thelemanniana . . . . . Hummingbird Bush
Isomeris arborea . . . . . Bladderpod
Jasminum humile . . . . . Italian Jasmine
Juniperus species . . . . . Juniper
Laurus nobilis . . . . . Sweet Bay
Lupinus arboreus . . . . . Tree Lupine
Mahonia amplectans
Mahonia nevinii . • . Nevin Mahonia
Nerium oleander . . . . . Oleander
Penstemon antirrhinoides . . . . . Yellow Penstemon
Photinia fraseri
DROUGHT TOLERANT PLANTS FOR ATASCADERO
MEDIUM SHRUBS 5-10 feet, continued
Pittosporum tobira . . . . . Tobira
Pyracantha species . . . . . Firethorn
Rhamnus californica . . . . . California Coffeeberry
Rhamnus crocea . . . . . Redberry
Ribes aureum . . . . . Golden Currant
Ribes sanguineum . . . . . Red Flowering Gooseberry
Ribes sanuineum 'Glutinusum' . . . . .
Romneya coulteri . . . . . Matilija Poppy
Salvia apiana . . . . . White Sage
Simmondisia chinensis Jojoba
Tecomaria capensis . . . . . Cape Honeysuckle
Viguiera species
Xylosma congestum 'Compacta' . . . . . Shiny Xylosma
DROUGHT TOLERANT PLANTS FOR ATASCADERO
SMALL SHRUBS 3-5 feet
Achillea species . . . . . Yarrow
Arctostaphylos densiflora 'James West'
Arctostaphylos hookeri . . . . . Monterey Manzanita
Arctostaphylos 'Green Sphere'
Argemone species . . . . . Prickly Poppy
Artemisia californica California Sagebrush
Calliandra californica
Calliandra eriophylla . . . . . False Mesquite
Cassia species . . . . . Senna
Ceanothus 'Blue Cushion'
Cistus species . . . . . Rockrose
Convolvulus cneorum . . . . . Bush Morning Glory
Cotoneaster buxifolius . . . . . Bright Bead Cotoneaster
Cotoneaster congestus
Encelia farinosa . . . . . Desert Encelia
Eriogonum crocatum . . . . . Saffron Buckwheat
Eriogonum fasciculatum . . . . . Common Buckwheat
C _ Hypericum beanii
Juniperus species . . . . . Juniper
Lavandual species . . . . . Lavender
Leptodactylon californicum . . . . . Prickly Phylox
Leucophyllum frutescens 'Compactum' . . . . . Texas Ranger
Lotus scoparius . . . . . Deerweed
Lupinus arboreus . . . . . Tree Lupine
Mimulus species . . . . . Monkey Flower
Osteospermum species African Daisy
Pennisetum setaceum . . . . . Fountain Grass
Penstemon heterophyllus . . . . . Blue Penstemon
Penstemon spectabilis . . . . . Showy Penstemon
Pittosporum tobira 'Wheeleri' . . . . . Wheeler' s Dwarf
Pyracantha species . . . . . Firethorn
Rosmarinus officinalis 'Prostratus' . . . . . Prostrate Rosemary
Salvia clevelandii Cleveland Sage
DROUGHT TOLERANT PLANTS FOR ATASCADERO
GROUND COVERS
Acacia redolens
Achillea species . . . . . Yarrow
.Arctostaphylos species
Atriplex glauca
Baccharis pilularis . . . . . Prostrate Coyote Brush
Ceanothus griseus horizontalis . . . . . Carmel Creeper
Centaurea cineraria . . . . . Dusty Miller
Cistus salviifolius . . . . . Sageleaf Rockrose
Coprosma kirkii . . . . . Creeping Coprosma
Cotoneaster buxifolius . . . . . Bright Bead Cotoneaster
Cotoneaster congestus
Eriogonum crocatum . . . . . Saffron Buckwheat
Eriogonum fasciculatum . . . . . Common Buckwheat
Gazania species . . . . . Gazania
Grevillea 'Noellii'
Grevillea rosmarinifolia . . . . . Rosemary Grevillea
Helianthemum species . . . . . Sunrose
Hypericum calycinum . . . . . Aaron' s Beard
Juniperus species . . . . . Juniper
Lobularia maritima . . . . . Sweet Alyssum
Lupinus nanus . . . . . Annual Lupine
Mahonia repens . . . . . Creeping Mahonia
Pyracantha species . . . . . Firthorn
Rosmarinus off icinalis 'Prostratus' . . . . . Prostrate Rosemary
Salvia sonomensis . . . . . Creeping Sage
Santolina chamaecyparissus . . . . . Lavender Cotton
Santolina virens
Trifolium frageriferum O' Connor' s . . . . . O' Conrmr'sLegume
Zauschneria californica . . . . California Fuchsia
a
• !� TING 'I AGENDA
• MEMORANDUM
TO: City Council
THROUGH: Mike Shelton, City Manager
FROM: Paul Sensibaugh, Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: Signal Maintenance Contract
DATE: January 6, 1987
Recommendation:
Staff recommends that Council approve the attached Traffic
Signal Maintenance Contract with Lee Wilson Electric of Arroyo
Grande.
Background:
In the past, traffic signal maintenance has been done by
Caltrans on a contract basis. Caltrans discontinued this service
• at the beginning of the 1986/87 fiscal year due to manpower limi-
tations. Lee Wilson Electric Company has done signal repair work
for the City in the past and is qualified to maintain traffic
signals. This Company has been maintaining our- signals since
July 1, 1986 when the Caltrans maintenance program ended.
Fiscal Impact:
Contract costs are $1800 per year plus an hourly rate for
emergency call-outs. The approximate cost of State service was
$2400.00 per year. Funds for this maintenance are available in
the 1986/87 budget.
•
`n�
„• ._.r . 0
TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT •
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day
of , 198_, by and between the CITY OF ATAS-
CADERO, a municipal corporation of the State of California,
hereinafter referred to as the "City", and LEE WILSON ELECTRIC,
a California Corporation, hereinafter -referred to as "Contractor" .
Witnesseth
WHEREAS, the City of Atascadero has considered a
proposed contract tendered by the Contractor for traffic
signal maintenance, including the furnishing of all labor,
services, materials, and equipment; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Atascadero
does find and determine it would be in the best interest of •
the City that the proposed contract be accepted and executed;
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the
mutual covenants and promises of the parties hereto and upon
the express terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, it is
agreed by and between them, and each with the other, as
follows:
FIRST: The Contractor agrees to furnish all tools,
equipment, apparatus, facilities, labor, services, and mate-
rials, and perform all work necessary to maintain traffic
signal facilities in a good and workmanlike manner. It is
understood and agreed that all said labor, services,
•
1
materials, and equipment shall be furnished and said work
performed and completed by the Contractor as an independent
contractor, subject to the inspection and approval of the
City, its Director of Public Works, or inspectors or their
representatives.
SECOND: The Contractor agrees to inspect, clean,
adjust, and make a routine inspection of each control unit
once per month. The Contractor agrees that he will maintain a
record in each controller cabinet showing the date and time
checked. Controller units shall not be replaced, except
temporarily for repair, without prior approval of the City.
THIRD: The Contractor agrees to replace or repair
any and all defective or worn out parts in the signal system
which cause a signal failure or malfunction as the occasion
arises.
b
p
AoU RTH: The Contractor agrees to replace all lamps
in all signals using an eighty percent (80%) depletion curve,
but not to exceed twelve (12) months, using standard traffic
signal lamps. The Contractor shall be entitled to receive and
shall be paid by the City the sum of $540. 00 per year for each
signalized intersection.
FIFTH: The Contractor agrees to clean, polish, and
inspect all lenses and reflectors at the time the traffic
signals are relamped. At this time, all broken or deterio-
rated parts will be replaced or changed as necessary, and
parts, except lamps, will be billed on a separate invoice.
2
SIXTH: The Contractor agrees to maintain a 24-hour
per day emergency service for the replacement of burned out
lamps or controller malfunctions. In the course of traveling
to and from the locations of the equipment to be serviced, the
Contractor's representative shall observe the traffic signals
at other designated intersection for possible malfunctions.
The replacement of burned out ��amps' need not be on an emer-
gency basis, provided there are at least two (2) indications
still operative for each direction of travel. In such case,
replacement shall be handled as soon as possible in a routine
manner.
SEVENTH: The Contractor agrees to provide the same
service for the repair of other equipment and appurtenances,
such as safety lighting, pedestrian signals, and detector
devices, which the Contractor may be called upon from time to
time by th��,,�yy City- to repair, replace, or refurbish.
'�EIGHTH
(a) For and in consideration of furnishing said
labor, services, materials, and equipment under paragraphs
SECOND, THIRD, FIFTH, and SIXTH, except when such repairs are
necessitated by obsolescence or accidental damage, such as
collision, acts of God, and vandalism, the Contractor shall be
entitled to receive and shall be paid by the City the sum of
$75. 00 per month for each signalized intersection (Traffic Way
and E1 Camino Real, and El Camino Real and Curbaril) or each
newly signalized intersection.
3
(b) For and in consideration for furnishing said
labor, services, materials, and equipment under paragraph
SIXTH, when such repairs are necessitated by obsolescence or
-accidental damage as defined above, and under paragraph
SEVENTH, the Contractor shall be entitled to receive, in addi-
tion to the monthly sum above, labor costs at the Contractor's
prevailing standard rates, as follows:
Emergency Call Outs
(1) Regular Hours - Weekdays (8: OOAM - 4:30PM) . $39.00/hr
(2) Overtime Hours - Weekdays (4: 30PM - 8: OOAM) . . . $55. 00/hr
(2 hour minimum)
(3) Overtime Hours - Saturdays . . . . . . . . . . . $55. 00/hr
(2 hour minimum)
(4) Overtime Hours - Sundays & Holidays. . . . . $68. 00/hr
(2 hour minimum)
(5) Plus equipment used at posted rates.
(6) All parts used will be billed on separate invoice.
(c) The cost for services provided herein may be
negotiated each year following the anniversary date of this
Agreement, and will be subject to the approval of the City.
Any insurance increases may also be negotiated at that time. -
NINTH: The Contractor shall carry public liability
and property damage insurance in an amount not less than
$500, 000. 00 for injuries, including accidental death, for any
one person, and subject to the same limit for each person in
an amount not less than $1, 000, 000. 00 for any one accident,
and property damage insurance in an amount not less than
4
$50, 000. 00. The Contractor shall also maintain during the 0
life of this Contract, workers' compensation insurance cover-
ing all of his employees on the project, and shall furnish to
-the City, certificates issued by such companies showing that
all of the above-mentioned insurance has been issued and is in
full force prior to commencing work.
The Contractor shall likewise obtain public
liability and property damage insurance to cover vehicles used
or maintained by him in the performance of the work, with
liability limits of not less than $500, 000. 00 for any one
person, and $1, 000, 000. 00 for any one accident, and property
damage of $50, 000. 00.
TENTH: This Contract shall extend for a period of
one (1) year from the date hereof. However, either party, in
its discretion, shall have the right to terminate this Agree-
ment at any time sooner by giving sixty (60) days advance
written notice.
ELEVENTH: If the Contractor should neglect to
prosecute the work properly, or fail to perform any provisions
of this Contract, the City, after three (3) days written
notice to the Contractor, without prejudice to any other
remedy it may have, may make good such deficiencies and may
deduct the cost thereof from the payment then or thereafter
due to the Contractor.
TWELFTH: Except for the manufacturer's factory
warranty, the Contractor disclaims all warranties with respect
5
t
to materials supplied hereunder, and further disclaims any and
all liability for failure to perform or delay in performance
hereunder where the same is due, in whole or in part, to any
-cause beyond the Contractor's reasonable control, such as but
not limited to fire, flood, earthquake, lightning, strike, or
other labor difficulty.
THIRTEENTH: The Contractor shall not be liable for
damages arising out of injury to person or damage to property
of the City or any third party unless the same was due to the
Contractor's fault or neglect.
(a) The City further agrees to indemnify to the
extent authorized by law, and save free and harmless the
Contractor against negligent acts or omissions caused by the
City, its agents or employees, and any costs and expenses
incurred by the respective parties on account of any claim
therefor. The Contractor agrees to indemnify and save free
and harmless the City and its authorized representatives and
employees against negligent acts or omissions caused by the
Contractor, his agents, or employees, and any costs and
expenses incurred by the respective parties on account of any
claim therefor.
(b) It is agreed by the parties that this indemnity
agreement is not limited in any way by the extent of any
Policy of insurance currently in force and held by either
party. Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limit-
ing in any way the extent to which the Contractor may be held
6
responsible for payment of damages to persons or property
resulting from his operation or any operations of any subcon-
tractors under him.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City Council of the City of
Atascadero has caused this Agreement to be subscribed by its
Mayor and City Clerk, and said Contractor has agreed and
caused this Agreement to be executed by his duly authorized
officer.
CITY: CONTRACTOR:
CITY OF ATASCADERO, LEE WILSON ELECTRIC COMPANY
a municipal corporation, a California Corporation
By B C
MARJORIE R. MACKEY, Mayor Lee Nilson Jr.
Vice President
ATTEST:
BOYD C. SHARITZ, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
JEFFREY G. JORGENSEN
City Attorney
JGJ:fr/1/19/87
C:AGATA290
0 •
LEE•W_/LSON
ELECTRIC COMPANY
P.O. BOX 250 • ARROYO GRANDE, CALIFORNIA 93420-0250
ESTABLISHED 1929 1151 HIGHWAY 101 • PHONE (805) 489-4216
February 10, 1987
- EQUIPMENT RATES
1) SERVICE TRUCK. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 7. 50/Hour
2) BUCKET TRUCK. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. $21 . 00/Hour
3) CRANE TRUCK. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $21. 00/Hour
EMERGENCY PERSONNEL
1 ) CRAIG RULISON . . 805/543-8096
2) DONALD RUSSELL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 805/481-1196
3) LEE WILSON III . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 805/489-9672
STATE OF CALIFORNIA—BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY R F rI"' GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN, Govemor
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
P.O. BOX 8114, SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93403-8114
TELEPHONE: (805) 549-3111 ._
February 11, 1986
Mr. Paul Sensibaugh
Public Works Director
City of Atascadero
P. 0. Box 747
Atascadero, CA 93423
Dear Mr. Sensibaugh:
It is necessary for Caltrans to reduce services provided to local
agencies. Caltrans has been maintaining two signals for the City of
Atascadero, but we will not be able to provide this service after
July 1, 1986. This reduction is necessary because of our increasing
inventory and the limitation on our resources.
The two signals we have been maintaining are:
1. El Camino Real and Curbaril Avenue
2. E1 Camino Real and Traffic Way
I hope this notification will give you sufficient time to make other
arrangements for your signal maintenance. The City of Salinas and
the City of Paso Robles have their signal maintenance done by
contract. I understand that Lee Wilson Electric of Arroyo Grande
may be involved in signal maintenance work.
We will also discontinue our signal maintenance service to the City
of Grover City (4 signals) and the City of Arroyo Grande (3
signals) . Perhaps the three agencies may be able to make a joint
arrangement for signal maintenance.
We can, if necessary, provide emergency response on your signals.
If your agency would screen the trouble calls to see that a response
is truly necessary. If you are unable to provide through your
forces or through a contract response the necessary emergency
corrective work, we can respond if personnel are available.
Permanent repair would be your agency' s responsibility.
The current maintenance agreement will be terminated July 1, 1986 .
I hope that your agency will be able to make this adjustment in the
time provided.
Sincerely,
R. G. Elliott
Deputy District Director
Maintenance & Operations
ITEM
MEMORANDUM_
TO: City Council February 23, 1987
VIA: Michael Shelton, City Manager
FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director lkS
SUBJECT: Zone Change 30-86 : Second Reading of Ordinance No.
145 (High Density Single Family Area: Atascadero
City Planning Commission)
BACKGROUND/RECOMMENDATION:
This Ordinance had first reading approval on February 10, 1987.
Recommend approval of Ordinance No. 145, second reading.
• HE:ph
Enclosure : Draft Ordinance 145
•
EXHIBIT H
GP: 1G-87
ORDINANCE NO. 145 ZC: 30-86
AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ATASCADERO AMENDING SECTIONS 9-3.154 AND 9-3.164
OF THE OFFICIAL ZONING TEXT OF THE CITY OF
ATASCADERO BY REVISING THE MINIMUM LOT SIZE IN THE LSF-X AND
RSF-X FROM 2 ACPE; WITHOUT SEWER TO 20,000 -SQUARE -FEET; -WITH SEWER
(ZC: 30-86 CITY OF ATASCADERO)
WHEREAS, the proposed Zoning Map Amendment is consistent with the
General Plan as required by Section 65860 of the California Government
Code; and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendment is in conformance with Section
65800 et seq. of the California Government Code concerning zoning reg-
ulations ; and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendment will not have a significant adverse
effect upon the environment. The Negative Declaration prepared for the
project is adequate.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Atascadero does ordain
as follows :
Section 1. Council Findings.
1. The proposed land use map change results in a logical represen-
tation of the existing residential area.
2. The proposal is compatible with the surrounding land use and
zoning.
3. The proposal will not result in any significant adverse environ-
mental impacts upon the environment.
4. The proposal is consistent with the policies of the General
Plan land use policies and other elements of the General Plan.
Section 2. Zoning Change.
Sections 9-3.154 and 9-3.164 of the Official Zoning Text of the
City of Atascadero on file in the City Community Development Depart-
ment is hereby amended to revise the minimum lot size from 2 acre
to 203,000 square feet in the RSF-X and LSF-X zones and designations.
Section 3. Zoning Text
Sections 9-3.154 and 9-3.164 of the Official Zoning Text of the City
of Atascadero on file in the City Community Development Department
is hereby amended as shown on the attached Exhibits A and B which
are hereby made a part of this ordinance by reference.
EXHIBIT G
Ordinance No. 145
Page Two
Section 4. Publication.
The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published once
within fifteen (15) days after its passage in the Atascadero News ,
a newspaper of general circulation, printed, published, and circu-
lated in the City in accordance with Section 36933 of the Government
Code ; shall certify the adopting and posting of this ordinance and
shall cause this ordinance and this certification together with
proof of posting to be entered into the Book of Ordinances of this
City.
Section 5. Effective Date.
This ordinance shall go into effect and be in full force and effect
at 12 :01 a.m. on the 31st day after its passage.
On motion by and seconded -by
the motion was approved by the following roll cal
vote.
AYES:
NOES :
ABSENT:
By:
MARJO(YEE MACKEY, Mayor
City of Atascadero, California
ATTEST:
BOYD C. SHARITZ, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
MICHAEL SHELTON, City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
G EN, City Attorney
*/YPRPARED B
HENRY ENUEN, Community eve opment irector
L
• 0
ADOPTED JULIE 27, 1983
(d) Skilled Nursing Facility, where the number of residents under 1
care is greater than six (See Section 9-6 .134)
(e) Residential care, where the -number of residents under care is
greater than six (See Section 9-6 .135)
(f) Organizational houses
(g) Pipeline
(h) Bed and Breakfast
(i) Caretaker residence (See Section 9-6.104)
(j) The following uses where established in a residential struc-
ture of historical importance are satisfied.
(1) Broadcasting studios
(2) Business support services
(3) Libraries and museums
(4) Offices
(5) Personal Services
(6) School-business and vocational l
(k) Kennels (See Section 9-6 .111)
LUAL -D- I,(1IT14 5��'M-,T7 1rz ACrLC, L)PL'Z.E 5t;-vLTZc5 uvr
LAZLF
9-3.154. Minimum Lot Size: The minimum7lot_size in the Residen-
tial Single Family Zone shall beIene a €-�-lam cr- and may range up
to two and one-half (2 1/2) acres. The size of-a Tod shall be consis-
tent with the land use designation set forth in the General Plan and
shall be indicated by the symbols set forth in the following chart,
which shall be shown on the Offical Zoning Maps as provided by Section
9-3.104 (d) .
SYMBOL _ MINIMUM LOT SIZE
_.2)hiZ FC&TVJFM scW)L�,;,iA,_^[_7I✓METE 5EwEC is )UDT
Xi: n AILA-ALF
y one (1) acre, when sewers are available
one and one-half (1 1/2) acres, when sewers are
not available
Z one and one-half (1 1/2) to two and one-half
(2 1/2) acres based on performance standards set
forth in this Section.
(a) Performance Standards: The following performance standards
shall be evaluated for each lot which is appended with the
"Z" symbol in determining its minimum lc%*
9PIE(T Ac OEDIMANCE H-5-
(1)
HS(1) Distance from the Center of the Con ZCNECPAMC ZC: 3D'1s6
r, /\AIn 77<��:7.X
ADOPTED JUNE 27, 10 40
(g) Pipeline
(h) Bed and breakfast
(i) Caretaker residence (See Section 9-6.104)
(j) The following uses where established in a residential struc-
� .;''� ;`�: ture of historical importance:
Vic" -
(1) Broadcasting studios
(2) Business support services
(3) Libraries and museums
(4) Offices '`�r
(5) Personal Services "�-
r: err'''., .►:rM. -
.,� , (6) School - business and vocational -"
'sz" ZLllQ'� —SQQh ' RZ T WITH SEWLY % ACBE GUFF= SDUEZ is
NUT- AUA ILAIHE
9-3.164. Minimum Lot Size: The minimum#lot size in the LiDited
Residential Single Family Zone shall be'-one- aF : and may
range up to two and one-half (2 1/2) acres.The s 56--of a lot shall
be consistent with the land use designation set forth in the General
Plan and shall be indicated by the symbols set forth in the following
charts which shall be shown on the Official Zonin -
by Section 9-3.104 (d) . '�_K(Wtf fDm- GVTM SEWa
SYMBOL MINIMUM LOT SIZE /2A=- WHEYE-IR VE, IS uoy
X Imine- a1L - afire- �--�
Y ;one
acre, w en sewers are available
one and one-half (1 1/2) acres, when
sewers are not available
Z one and one-half (1 1/2) to two and
one-half (2 1/2) acres based on per-
formance standards set forth in this
Section
(a) Performance Standards: The following performance standards
shall be evaluated for each lot which is appended with the
"Z" symbol in determining its minimum lot size:
(1) Distance from the Center of the Community: Using the
_ Atascadero Administration Building as the center of the
community, the lot size factor based on this performance
standard shall be:
1
DISTANCE LOT SIZE FACTOR
0 - 4000 ' — 0.08
4000 ' - 6000 ' 0.10
6000 ' - 8000 ' [PIE T' E CEDIUAM E lyS
I' r e d a c r ad i a 1 d i7rr, -17 71 -
r
" 'NG
D1
MEPTORANDUM
TO: City Council February 23, 1987
VIA: Michael Shelton, City Manager
FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director A
SUBJECT: Zone Change 28-86 : Second Reading of Ordinance No.
144 (6280 Tecorida Road: James Grinnell)
BACKGROUPID/RECOMMENDATION:
This Ordinance had first reading approval on February 10, 1987.
Recommend approval of Ordinance No. 144, second reading.
• HE:ph
Enclosure: Draft Ordinance 144
EXHIBIT E
GP: 1E-87
ZC: 28-86
ORDINANCE NO. 144
AN ORDINANCE •
OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ATASCADERO AMENDING SECTION MAP NUMBER 17
OF THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAPS OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO
BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY AT 6280 TECORIDA ROAD
FROM RMF-16(FH) TO CR(FH) (ZONE CHANGE 28-86 GRINNELL)
WHEREAS, The proposed zoning map amendment is consistent. with the
General Plan as required by Section 65860 of the California Government
Code; and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendment is in conformance with Section
65800 et seq. of the California Government Code concerning zoning regu-
lations ; and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendment will not have a significant adverse
effect upon the environment. The Negative Declaration prepared for the
project is adequate.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Atascadero does ordain
as follows :
Section 1. Council Findings.
1. The proposed land use map change results in a logical repre- •
sentation of the existing residential area.
2. The proposal is compatible with the surrounding land use and .
zoning.
3. The proposal will not result in any significant adverse environ-
mental impacts upon the environment.
4. The proposal is consistent with the policies of the General
Plan land use policies and other elements of the General Plan.
Section 2. Zoning Change.
Map Number 17 of the Official Zoning Maps of the City of Atascadero
on file in the City Community Development Department is hereby amended to
reclassify the following described property from RMF-16 (FH) to CR(FH) .
Lots 21, 223% 23 and portion of 20, Block UA of the Atascadero Colony.
Section 3. Zoning Map.
Map number 17 of the Official Zoning Maps of the City of Atascadero
on file in the City Community Development Department is hereby amended
as shown on the attached location map which is hereby made a part of th*
ordinance by reference.
Ordinance No. 144 EXHIBIT E
Page Two
Section 4. Publication.
The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published once
within fifteen (15) days after its passage in the Atascadero News , a
newspaper of general circulation, printed, published, and circulated
in the City in accordance with Section 36933 of the Government Code ;
shall certify the adopting and posting of this ordinance and shall
cause this ordinance and this certification together with proof of
posting to be entered into the Book of Ordinances of this Ciy.
Section 5. Effective Date.
This ordinance shall go into effect and be in full force and ef-
fect at 12 :01 a.m. on the 31st day after its passage.
On motion by and seconded by
, theforegoing or inance is hereby adopted in its en-
tirety by the To=&7ing roll call vote :
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
DATE ADOPTED: By: � `ice tl
MARJO ' E MACKEY, Mayor
ATTEST: City of Atascadero, California
BOYD C. SHARITZ, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
MICHAEL SHELTON, City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
F YrGEN, City Attorney
RE ARE t B
HENRY ENGEN
Community Development Director
a �
Af
� � • '� ■111 ►
Twill
SEEN
MIN
mom
Iwo NA1
PI
� . � � .: �j Y'��♦'. yr r.
154
�� ��,� SII • �.,,, .
• •
� �� �1• �� �i • - : .�� �� Vii.
C '
Ila
l
lab -So
..
•� �� r W
.. v
c'
„ /4P
'' �`<�.'. •, . .`ice � "__ _� / � __ * �
A
CD
C-3 A R a 1� A N T g y 6 N V L
C
N r a GItt S)IT F - s[TE 7LAM
b 7 ZC, Ze' db
0 6Zffi TML IVDA CCfZ1 x1 N
i ETi(� 7 gG�f�dDq
• MEMORANDUM
TO: City Council
THROUGH: Mike Shelton, City Manager
FROM: Paul en ibaugh, Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: Accoustical and Sound System Improvements
of Council Chambers
DATE: February 13, 1987
Recommendation:
The Rotunda Committee appointed by Council recommends that
certain accoustical and sound system improvements be made to the
4th floor Rotunda and to authorize the City Manager to enter into
an agreement with Bruce Walker, a specialized consultant in
acoustics, to design the above improvements, all within the cur-
rent 1986-87 budget.
Background:
• The Rotunda Committee which consists of Mayor Mackey,
Councilman Handshy, the City Manager and the Director of Public
Works, met again on both February 2 and February 12 to discuss
the acoustics in the 4th Floor Rotunda and the future use of that
room. (See attached reports)
Discussion:
It was decided that the room could lend itself to both a
meeting chamber and a ballroom and that the improvements noted
below would be beneficial regardless of the future final location
of the Council Chambers.
It is not the intent of this report to consider the use of
the space for rental parties, etc. That topic will be brought
back as a seperate issue at a later date with a complete evalua-
tion, including rules and regulations and rental rates.
It is the intent of this report to emphasize a need to move
ahead on the acoustic and sound system improvements based on the
theory of a potential joint usage of the premises.
The following work will be requested none of which will
require formal competative bidding procedures or budget adjust
• ments. Conceptual approval is requested.
Carpeting to Perimeter •
(15 Ft. Radius Circle left open) $ 2,000
Sound Absorbant Treatment to Walls 9,250
New Sound System (Long Term)
Including design 13,500
Lighting Improvements 1,300
Fiscal Impact:
The cost is estimated at Approximately $26,000 which is
within the current budget parameters. '
•
�vL
iCOUNCIL CHAMBERS MEETING
ins
February 2, 1987
PRESENT: Marjorie Mackey
Mike Shelton
Don Leib
RECOMMENDED ALTERNATIVE
Formal Meeting Room (Council Chambers etc. )/Ball Room
4k Carpeting on Perimeter (estimate) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$ 21000
+ ' Sound Absorbant Treatment to Walls. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$ 9,250
< New Sound System (Long Term) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$13,500
Lighting Improvements (estimate) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$ 1,300
TOTAL
ALTERNATIVE ADVANTAGE
Maximize use of facility - Making it available to the public as
well as for City uses (multi-purpose use)
Room acoustics enhanced for all functions
Enhanced aesthetics for all functions
Can be accomplished in a relatively short period of time within
budget
OTHER ALTERNATIVES
,Police Facility it
y Bu 'ild in Council Chambers
Use Prather Building (on a second priority basis)
Fourth Floor Rotunda - Council Chambers Only Fixed Seating
DIRECTION FOR NEXT MEETING
Don Leib - To research private and public community center use
policies.
Mike Shelton - Research availability of Prather Building
Investigate rumor of local court room being
constructed at the old hospital site
RESCHEDULE COMMITTEE MEETING
f.
Full committee consideration with goal to make recommendations at
the February 23, 1987 Council Meeting.
MS:kv
File: MRotunda
y
x
�)jy C2 F
ti
r
r:
MEMORANDUM
To: Committee for Council Chambers Renovation
From: Paul M. Sensibaugh, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Subject: Useage and Acoustical Improvements of Council Chambers
Date: January 21, 1987
Backround:
The Committee was formed by Council to study the proper permanent
housing for the Council Chambers and to recommend acoustical related
alterations for the chambers and sound system. The committee last met
in August of 1986 but did not come to a conclusion on the useage of
the rotundae. The monies for the sound system and any renovations
. were appropiated for this year's budget but until now cash flow in the
development tax funds prohibited the iniation of any projects.
Recently there has been a repeated demand from the council
meeting audiances to improve the acoustics of the 'nth floor rotunda
and the sound system. The acoustical study that the committee
reviewed previously is attached hereto for your information.
Other issues previously addressed by this committee included area
and capacity, assessability (including handicapped access) , fire
escape, compatability with ,point uses, restoration, historic
preservation, image, visual aids coordination, and cost.
Discussion:
The 4th floor has now been made earthquake resistant which will
enhance the comfort level of occupation by small crowds. Remodeling
to provide improved acoustical qualities will cause insignificant loss
of historic characteristics now existing in that rotunda, as compared
to the 1st floor rotunda which is highly susceptable to such impact.
Permanent cushioned seating was obtained from the County several years
ago and can be utilized for permanent seating if desired. The Fire
Marshall has determined that the maximum occupation of the 4th floor
rotunda is 235 for both portable and permanent seating.
The sound system itself has been piece-mealed together over the
Wears and is not providing adequate balance to the sound demands. The
shape and material of the present chambers is not conducive to proper
acoustics. Several options are discussed in the acoustical report and
others have been suggested by staff for the 4th floor room:
Sound Absorptive Treatment- Approximately 750 sq.ft. of
fiberglass board over 2x2 furring strips covered with an open weave
fabric can be added above and below the balcony .
0
Sound System-Short Ierm- A tamperproof unit plus a 1/3-octave
equalizer can provide temporary help to the poor existing system but
would be lost when a long term permanent system is installed.
Sound System-Long Term- For a portable seating arrangement an
automatic, voice-activated microphone mixer system with a wide-band
loudspeaker system designed for the shape and acoustical
characteristics of the room could be located behind and above the
council podium.
Sound System-Long Term- For a permanent seating arrangement the
above mixer system could be utilized with speakers mounted in front of
the council desk and distributed among the backs of the fixed seats.
This arrangement would reduce the need for sound absorbing treatment
by 30 to 40
Carpet can enhance sound distractions such as shuffling of feet,
movement of chairs, etc. but is not considered a good solution without
the above considerations.
Experimentation has been considered with the repositioning of the
audiance podium, necktie microphones, lighting aids that don't block
the faces of councilmembers, and general instructions to those
speaking.
The following is a cost comparison of several acoustical and room
useage alternatives for review:
! i
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
ACCOUSTICAL AND USEAGE
ALTERNATIVES
* SOUND- * COUNCIL CHAMBERS ONLY 1 JOINT BALLROOM-COUNCIL
* ACCOUSTICAL
* OPTIONS * ALT A ALT B ALT C i ALT D -ALT E ALT F
*SOUND SYSTEM-SHORT TERM* i
* -tamperproof unit plus* $1 ,000 t $1,000
* 1/3-octave equalizer * I
*• . • • • . • • . • . . . • . • • . . . . . .*. • . • . . . . • . • . . . . . • • • • • • • • • • • • • . . • • • . • • • • • . . . . . .
*SOUND SYSTEM-LONG TERM * �*
* -auto,voice-activated * $13,500 I $13,500
* mic,wide band speaker * _
*
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
*SOUND SYSTEM-LONG TERM * i
* -seat-mounted speakers* 515,500 ! $16,000
* mic/speaker matrixing * t
*. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .*. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .*
t
* *
Z
***********************
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
* ACCOUSTICAL * _
* WORK
**************** ********
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
*SOUND ABSORPTIVE TREAT * _
* MENT-fiberglass board * $9,250 $9,250 $6,000 1 $9,250 $9,250 • $9, 250
*open weave covering * . t
*
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .*. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
*CARPET-full floor * $6,000 $6,000 $6,000 - 1
* -to co l l umns * $Lt,000 s'1,000 $4,000 t $4,500 $4,500 $4,500
* -15 ft. radius * $1,500 $1,506 51,500 1 $1,500 s1,500 , $1 ,500
*PERMANENT SEATING- * I
* county upholstered * $1,200 $1,200 $1,200 0
* new cushioned * $4,000 $4,000 s'1,000 !
*
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .*. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .*
*PORTABLE SEATING- * i 50 $0 $0
* existing metal ��. j+lA.e(a Po les 1 $3,000 $3,000 $3,000
* new upholstered V* a S $2,500 $2,SOQ $2,500
+M*+M+M+IF+MaM+M+M+N+liil►+IF+M+M+I+It+1+M+M+Y�+1+1+IE+Ii+IF+1F+M+1E+1►+I+IF+M+IF+IF+1►+M+IF+It+MM+IF+IF+IF+IF+Ir+M+IF+K+lt+lr �+It+N+M*+Ir+li+K+M+I►+w+K+1+IF+Ii+K+1+It+IF+1�+IF+IFaK+IF+�+MMF+I�+IF
* ALTERNATIVE MIN * $12,950 525,450 $24,200 * $11,750 $24,250 $26,750
* TOTAL COSTS MAX * $20,250 $32, 750 $31,500 * 517,750 $30,250 $32,750
0
Except for the assumed undesirable short term solutions (A1t.A
and Alt.B) the costs shown range from $2'1,200 to $32,750 with the
differences in useage affecting the costs by only $1000 to $2000.
This data is not in itself substantial to argue for or against a
council-only or ,point use facility . Other factors should be discussed
for a full analysis of the problem. Below is a list of some of the
pros and cons of each senario:
ADVANTAGES DISADUANTAGES
COUNCIL ONLY (a)No set up or removal of (a)No parties.
seating. (b)No additional rev-
(b)No messes to clean up enues.
from parties. (c)Public criticism.
(c)No fees to handle for (d)
use of facilities. (e)
(d)Less damage to facilities. (f)
(a)Fewer liability problems. (g)
(F)Public support. (h)
(g)
(h)
JOINT USE (a)Functions during idle (a)City hall messes.
times. (b)Access to other
(b)Revenue generator. areas of building
(c)Public support . (c)Increase liability.
(d) (d)Cost of security
(e) guards.
(f) (e)Cost of set up and
(g) cleaning.
(h) (F)Cost of insurance.
(g)Public criticism.
Lh)
Many of the considerations are intangibles such -as public
sentiment and appropiate involvement of government in social or non-
recreational events. No attempt is made here to measure these items.
It should be noted here that the Pavilion Renovation has been budgeted
in connection with a volunteer contribution from the Pavilion
Renovation Committee. The outcome of the future use of this building
may have a direct affect on the projected use of the qth floor
rotunda.
Fiscal Impact:
Costs other than those already discussed are shown for a longer
term view of rotunda-related improvements. A total of $26,600 was
appropiated in the current fiscal year budget for room renovations and
council chamber improvements. Additionally, there could be
0 0
significant renovations made with the present Historic Preservation
Grant once the HVAC work is completed. The Development Impact Fee
should produce about $28,000 per year for future renovations discussed
below.
Upgrade Elevator
Replace Controls S 30,000
Replace Elevator wlHydraulic 65,000
Install 2nd Elevator 70,000
Two New Side-by-Side 150,000
Restore Kitchen 2,000
Painting 4,000
Hang Flags,Historic Decorations 0
Total Minimum Cost (Present 8 Future) S 47,750
Total Maximum Cost C ) 188,750
BRUCE WALKER (805) 497.1902
W72.iLItin9 and GReszazc4 in c4cou.stics
2659 TOWNSGATE ROAD • SUITE 101
WESTLAKE VILLAGE, CALIFORNIA 91361
PRELIMINARY ACOUSTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS
F O R
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS RELOCATION
June 6, 1936
Prepar`d For
City of A"ascadero
Public Works Department
F. O. Box 747
Atascadero, CA 93423
M
i
INTRODUCTION
The City of Atascadero is considering the possibility of
relocating the City Council Chambers from the fourth floor
rotunda to the first floor rotunda, currently occupied by the
Historical Museum. The Public Works Department has requested
that the acoustical characteristics of the first floor
rotunda be reviewed, and that a preliminary assessment be
made of its .suitability for use as Council Chambers. Due to
the historical significance of the building, and this room in
particular, any modifications or alterations for acoustic
purposes must be accomplished within the existing
architectural character of the room.
DEFINITIONS
1. Decibel (dB) - A unit division on a logarithmic
scale whose base is the tenth root of ten, used to represent
ratios of quantities proportional to power.
2. Sound Pressure Level (SPL) - The ratio, expressed in
decibels, of the mean-squared sound pressure to the square of
the reference pressure, 20 uPa.
3. Reverberation Time (RT, o or T, o ) - The time after
cessation of excitation, in seconds, for sound in an enclosed
space to decay from an initial level to a level 60 dB lower.
ACOUSTIC MEASUREMENTS
A series of reverberation and sound distribution
measurements was conducted in the first and fourth floor
rotundas. The reverberation measurements were taken to
determine the amount of sound absorbing surface or other
treatments that would be required to allow reasonable speech
intelligibility. The distribution tests were made to assess
the affects of the domed ceiling on possible focusing of
sound in the rooms.
With the spaces essentially unoccupied (save for myself
and one or two observers) , reverberation times were as shown
Figure 1. Mid-frequency times (which are responsible in
large part for the subjective "character" of the space) were
approximately 3. 5 seconds in the first floor rotunda and just
over 2 seconds in the fourth floor rotunda (which has
acoustic tile covering on the dome) .
The distribution measurements indicated that levels near
the center of the floor are 2 to 4 dB higher than those near
the sides and rear, for steady state excitation from a source
located at or at the potential location of the center of the
council desk. The effect was slightly more pronounced in the
first floor rotunda, where the dome is hard plaster. These
non-uniformities of level are not large, but may become more
exaggerated in the first floor rotunda if the reverberation
time is reduced substantially. Acoustic focusing by the
domes is not as strong as could be expected for two reasons :
First, the surface of the lower dome is broken up with a
cast- in pattern and the surface o4f the upper dome is
rendered partially acoustically absorptive by covering with
acoustic tile. Second. the centers of curvature of both
domes are at least 15 ft. -- above the floor, so that true
focusing is not possible. In the case of the lower dome, the
large chandelier is located near the center of curvature of
the dome, and helps to scatter sound out of a focusing
condition.
CALCULATIONS
Based on dimensional sketches provided by Mr. Crouch of
the City, approximate room volumes and total surface areas
were calculated for the two spaces. These were then used to
determine the amount of sound absorption which would have to
be added to each space to reduce reverberation times from the
measured values to a desired time (based on speech
intelligibility considerations) of approximately 1 second.
The computations were based on a full occupancy condition of
200 persons, which themselves add approximately 4 square feet
of .sound absorbing area each.
For the first floor- rotunda, the result of the
calculations indicates that 1, 500 square feet of 85%
efficient sound absorbing treatment would be needed to
provide the desired 1 second reverberation time.
The fourth floor rotunda is somewhat larger than that on
the first floor, and thus can stand to have a slightly higher
reverberation time for adequate speech intelligibility.
Further, the existing absorption is considerably greater due
the the acoustic tile on the dome. With full occupancy,
approximately 800 square feet of added absorption will be
desired.
Again, in both spaces, calculations of required
absorption have been based on full occupancy. A strongly
recommended measure would be to use upholstered seating for
the audience areas. This will reduce significantly the
dependence of the acoustical characteristics of the spaces
upon the occupancy level .
TREATMENT RECOMMENDATION AND ARCHITECTURAL CONSIDERATIONS
The only locations available for application of this
treatment, within the historical /architectural constraints,
is to the vertical wall surfaces between the columns. Based
on the dimensional sketches, there are approximately 126
running feet of such wall surface in the room ( four 15 ft.
wide spaces and 11 , 6 ft. wide spaces (twelfth covered with
projection booth) . The 15 ft. wide spaces have a recessed
area above a set of double doors, with surface area totalling
approximately 200 square ft. Filling each recess with sound
absorbing treatment and adding sound absorbing treatment of
height 16 ft. in each of the 6 ft. wide spaces would provide
the needed total absorption.
A reasonably easily implemented sound absorptive
treatment is a total of 2. 5 inches thick and consists of 2x2
furring (actual size 1 . 5" square) with 1 inch thick 6-10 pcf
density fiberglass board attached to the surface and a visual
covering of open-weave fabric. In this case, a practical
compromise might be to use the 2x2 (or even 2x3 on edge)
furring for the treatment in the recesses above the double
doors and then apply the treatment in the 6 ft. wide spaces
directly over the existing wall surface or on 1x2 furring
laid flat.
The key to preserving the architectural character of the
space would be to select a very plain, off-white fabric for
covering the treatment, and to move the existing wood trim
out to the surface of the acoustic treatment. Matching trim
could be added to the edges of the treatment.
If it is desired to improve the acoustics of the
existing Council Chambers instead, it is recommended that a 5.
ft. high strip of sound absorbing treatment be added to the
wall surfaces below the second level balcony,
and that a 3
ft. high strip of sound absorbingtreatment ment be added to the
wall surfaces above the balcony.
SOUND REINFORCEMENT
The existing sound reinforcement system appears to have
"grown" as dictated by increasing functional requirements and
availability of funds. In spite of this, the system works
fairly well , considering the far-from-ideal acoustical
environment. In the short term, I would recommend replacing
the "home hi-fi" type power amplifier with a more tamper-
proof unit and adding a 1/3-octave equalizer, which will
suppress some of the early feedback modes and allow
w considerably more gain from the system. In the long term,
consider changing to an automatic voice-activated microphone
mixer system which adjusts overall system gain based on the
number of "open" microphone channels. This allows a
substantial improvement in the overall system performance.
The big-expense item for the sound system would be a
wide-band loudspeaker system which is designed specifically
around the shape and acoustical characteristics of the space.
Preferred location of a central type system would be high on
the wall behind the council desk. In the first floor
rotunda, this would necessitate an architectural appendage,
but it could be made much less obtrusive than the current
projection booth.
�► s
A preferred arrangement, which would be applicable pp ble if
fixed seating were used, would be seat-back mounted
distributed loudspeakers. This would make the system less
sensitive to reverberation, and would reduce the total
requirement for sound absorbing treatments by 30-40%. In
this case, the council desk would be fitted with
loudspeakers, mounted on a raised panel , and a
microphone/speaker matrixing system would be used to prevent
feedback.
SUMMARY
The first floor rotunda could be used as a Council
Chambers, but would require addition of a large amount of
sound absorbing treatment to eliminate excessive
reverberation.
Sound absorbingtreatment should be
added to the fourth
floor rotunda to improve the acoustical environment for its
continued use as Council Chambers.
A step-wise modification of the sound reinforcement
system, including a new amplifier, an equalizer, automatic
microphone mixer and more sophisticated loudspeaker system
would improve speech intelligibility and reduce operational
problems.
Respectfully submitted.
� �
. Bruce Wal�ker. Ph. D.
Member. INCE
10 BRUCE WALKER - CONSULTING AND RESEARCH IN ACOUSTICS
9
8
7
En
ra
z
0
Li
ul 6
LJ
H
t— 5
z
o
H
Q
Ix
W 4
m
W
W
3
2
I
1 t
0 31 . 5 63 125 250 500 1K 2K 4K 8K 16K
FREQUENCY — HZ
FIRST FLOOR ROTUNDA
FOURTH FLOOR ROTUNDA
FIGURE 1 - MEASURED REVERBERATION TIMES
ANG AG7NDA
? 7 11iM #
• MEMORANDUM
TO: City Council
THROUGH: Mike Shelton, City Manager
FROM: Paul Sensibaugh, Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: Bridge over Atascadero Creek at or Near Lewis Avenue
DATE: February 18, 1987
Recommendation:
The City/School Committee recommends that the City proceed
with a Request for Proposals for a Traffic Circulation Study and
an Impact Mitigation Analysis for a new bridge over Atascadero
Creek as called for in the General Plan. Staff concurs with that e,„rr40
recommendation. Staff further recommends that Council direct,
with the congent of AUSD, the City/School Committee t9 appoint a G, OK
consultant and review any reports regarding the feasibility of 23
the bridge.
• Background:
The "Lewis Avenue Bridge" has been discussed for many years
and is included in the General Plan of the City. The City imple-
mented a Lewis Avenue Development Fee within the BIA area bound-
ary in April of 1985. The 1986-87 budget includes a line item
for the Lewis Avenue Bridge with the thought of doing a traffic
study and pre-engineering.
The traffic study was to tell the impact of the bridge on
the schools and nearby intersection with collectors and arter-
ials. The preliminary engineering would provide bridge type,
right-of-way appraisals, rough line and grade, the location of a
walk bridge, and cost estimates.
Discussion:
Prior to entering into a consultant agreement for the
design of the structure questions must be answered about the
feasibility of the connecting structure. The AUSD is aprehensive
about opening up Lewis Avenue schools to the Santa Ysabel
Capistrano traffic and would prefer a Palma Avenue alignment.
The City staff favors a Lewis Avenue alignment for directness of
route, less right-of-way cost and access to a potential future
development agency. It should be noted here that the School owns
the property along Atascadero Creek that will be spanned.
•
The City School Committee recognizes the need for a joint •
effort in solving anticipated problems and has asked to be the
body to select the Consultant and review studies or reports that
come out of this action.
City staff has prepared a Request-For-Proposals (attached)
that has been endorsed by the City/School Committee. Addition-
ally, the City and Schools have jointly selected three
(3) firms to invite to submit proposals. Namely, they are
Associated Transportation Engineers; ARE, Inc. ; and Gerald
Skiles.
Fiscal Analysis:
The City has budgeted $101,750 in the "Lewis Avenue" bridge
line item. This _ money was to be the start of the traffic
analysis/preliminary engineering that must occur for the project
to proceed. Only a portion, approximately $5,000 will probably
go to the traffic analysis. The remainder will go to engineering
and right-of-way, or into the project account.
The revenue to support the appropriation is being derived
from the Bordeaux House project. If this money is used as anti-
cipated, the Lewis Avenue Bridge Deve-lopment Fee will be reduced
from $1.93 to $1.63/sq.ft. of building space. If the $101,750 is
not used then the fee would remain the same until the question of •
the reality of the bridge is determined. The fee can only be
used for a bridge in this vicinity. The Bordeaux money was ori-
ginally for bridges in general, but the Development Fee Committee
recommended that Council budget the amount to this bridge` to show
initiative in implementing the General Plan concept and to show
developers that they will be contributing to a real project and
not just to an interest-bearing fund.
•
2 1�4.
SUBJECT: Request for Proposal - Traffic Analysis
New Bridge over Atascadero Creek
Dear Consultant:
You are invited to submit a proposal to the City of
Atascadero to provide a Traffic Analysis and an Impact-Mitigation
Analysis for a new bridge over Atascadero Creek near Lewis and
Palma Avenues.
The preliminary evaluation of the project calls for a bridge
that will connect two unjoined legs of a street that parallels E1
Camino Real near the City Administration Building.
Your proposal should be based on the following Scope of
Services.
1. Gather existing plans, maps, preliminary design engi-
neering, published or known ADT and other data.
2. Investigate and analyze existing information.
3. Assume a 20 year design - Project traffic based on a
origin- destination analysis.
4. Provide physical counts of existing ADT where no data is
- available.
5. Study the impact of two alternate alignments - one at
Lewis Avenue and one at Palma Avenue.
6. Analyze the mitigation for the impacts for each alter-
native with special emphasis on the existing school site
and future redevelopment. Each alternative may have
several options for correction of impacts.
7. The study area shall include a minimum of the following
streets.
a) E1 Camino Real from Curbaril to Rosario
b) Santa Ysabel from Curbaril to Rosario, including the
proposed connection
c) Curbaril from El Camino Real to Highway 41 (Sycamore
Rd)
d) Traffic Way from Highway 101 to San Jacinto
e) Highway 41 from Portola to Sycamore Road
8. Analyze all major intersections within the above area
including present and future turning movements.
9. Prepare cost estimates for the mitigation options at
each intersection, the school or other major concerns.
10. Prepare a report for presentation to the City Council
and School Board, including appropriate visual aids such
as maps, overheads etc.
11. Meet with the City-School Committee on a biweekly basis
with progress reports and to receive feedback.
12. Attend at least one Council meeting and one School Board
meeting for a presentation of the report.
13. Evaluation of any potential Archeological sites.
Evaluation to include an Archaeological reconnaissance
survey of the Lewis Avenue and the Palma Avenue sites
and an archaeological impact assessment for both. This
evaluation to include a thorough surface examination.
NOTE:
The City and School will provide any maps, records or other
data that it has readily available upon request by the consul-
tant. The Consultant should satisfy himself prior to submittal
of his proposal as to what information is available.
BACKGROUND:
The consultant shall present the City and School with
background information on his firm and the key individuals that
will work on this project. A contact person will be named if the
proposal is accepted. The company' s experience in San Luis
Obispo County and in Atascadero and with cities of comparable
size and work near schools should be included.
FEES:
The consultant shall present his proposal based on a cost
times a multiplier or an alternate similar approach if his ac-
counting system dictates. In any case a not-to-exeeed lump sum
figure shall be given. Out of pocket expenses shall be shown as
a separate estimate but shall be included in the upset figure.
TIME SCHEDULE:
Time is of the essence with this project. The consultant
shall indicate a completion time for the proposed services.
We look forward to your submittal and are ready to answer
any questions that you may have. Proposals are due on or before
12:00 noon, March 16th at the office of the Director of Public
Works/City Engineer.
Sincerely,
PAUL M. SENSIBAUGH
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
�7EM 3
• M E M O R A N D U M
TO: City Council February 23, 1987
VIA: Michael Shelton, City Manager
FROM: Henry Engen, Community Development Director W7?--
SUBJECT:
SUBJECT: Request authorization to purchase personal computer
and printer for General Plan and Enforcement Program
BACKGROUND:
As part of the 1986/87 Fiscal Year Budget, some $50 ,000 was ap-
propriated for the General Plan Amendment program. Our data
gathering has reached the point where it would be. useful to
have computer capability. In addition, our enforcement program
would be enhanced and relieve a clerical work overload by facil-
itating standard correspondence.
• BUDGET IMPACT:
The computer/printer being proposed is a personal computer which
would be housed in the Planning Division for use with the Gen-
eral Plan and Enforcement Programs at a cost quoted at $2,603. 36.
There would be no budget impact as it is proposed to be acquired
out of the General Plan appropriation.
RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize City Manager to sign Purchase Order for said equipment.
• MEMORANDUM
TO: Board of Directors
THROUGH: Mike Shelton, City Manager
FROM: Paul Sensibaugh, Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: Sewer Rei—mbursement Agreement
DATE: February 13, 1987
Recommendation:
Staff recommends that the Board approve the attached Sewer
Extension Reimbursement Agreement between the Sanitation District
and John and Shelly LeJeal.
Background:
Mr. & Mrs LeJeal have paid for the construction of a sewer
main extension to serve a lot owned by them on Lobos Avenue, in
doing so they provided sewer access to a number of other lots.
• The Sanitation District Ordinance allows for the reimbursement of
expenses incurred by individuals in the construction of a public
sewer line when subsequent connections are made to that line.
Engineering staff has reviewed the costs presented and have
determined that all are applicable to the project.
Because District Ordinance makes it mandatory for parcels to
connect to a sewer line within two (2) years of the time it be-
comes available we have, by regulation, set a Public Hearing for
this item.
It should be noted that this area would have been included
in Improvement District No. 4 (Seperado-Cayucos) if the main ex-
tension was not accomplished and the parcels included in Improve-
ment District No. 1.
Fiscal Impact:
There is no impact on the District from this action. Line
extension costs, annexation and connection fees will be paid by
the residents receiving the sewer service.
• !
ATASCADERO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT •
SEWER EXTENSION
REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, on the day of February, 1986, John and Shelly
LeJeal did enter into a Sewer Extension Performance Agreement with the
Atascadero County Sanitation District; and
WHEREAS, all terms of said Performance Agreement have been
complied with; and
WHEREAS, Article 8.2 (5) of the Ordinance Code of said District
provides for reimbursement of a portion of the funds expended in the
construction of an approved sewer extension;
NOW, THEREFORE, THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this
1987, by and between John and Shelly LeJeal 6305
San Anselmo Road, Atascadero, CA of the County of San Luis Obispo
State of California, hereinafter referred to as "Applicant" , and the
Atascadero County Sanitation District, a public corporation located in
the County of San Luis Obispo, State of California, hereinafter re-
ferred to as "District";
WITNESSETH: •
In consideration of the mutual promises, agreements, covenants
and conditions set forth herein, and in consideration of the final
approval of said sewer extension, the parties hereto do hereby
mutually covenant and agree as follows:
1. That the recitals set forth hereinabove are true, correct
and valid.
2. That Applicant owns real property described as Parcel A of
22-PM-97, Lobos Avenue, Atascadero, CA 93422.
3. That in the construction of an approved sewer extension, App-
licant has expended funds in the amount of $10,479. 24.
4. That Applicant is entitled to refunds of portions of said
expenditures at such times within fifteen (15) years
following the date of the execution of this Agreement as
additional connections are made to said sewer extension, from
the following parcels:
1) Lot 55A Block NC - 29-212-15
2) Lot 55B Block NC - 29-212-13
3) Lot 56A Block NC - 29-212-11
4) Lot 56 Block NC - 29-212-02
5) Lot 56B Block NC - 29-212-25 40
The amount to be paid by each parcel upon connection shall be
$1,746.54, plus interest as aforesaid, which is the total
expenditure divided equally between six (6) benefitting
parcels.
5. That District will collect the amounts specified in Section 4
from the owners of real properties listed in said Section, at
such times within fifteen (15) years following the date of
execution of this Agreement as permits are issued for
connection of said real properties to said sewer extension.
6. All monies collected in accordance with Item 5, above, will
be refunded to Applicant, except that any such refund shall
be reduced by the total of:
a. Any outstanding sewer service charges as outlined in
Article 11.1 of the Ordinance Code of the District.
7. Applicant further agrees to defend, indemnify and save harm-
less the City of Atascadero and District, and their officers,
agents and employees from any and all liability, claims, de-
mands, costs, expenses, causes of action, damages and judg-
ments, of whatsoever kind and nature and to whomsoever
occurring, arising out of this Agreement or occasioned by the
performance or attempted performance hereof, including but
not limited to any act or omission to act on the part of the
Applicant or his agents or employees or independent con-
tractors directly responsible to Applicant.
8. Neither party to this Agreement shall assign or transfer this
Agreement or any interest therein without the prior written
consent of the other party.
9. Any waiver by District of any failure by Applicant to comply
with any term or condition of this Agreement shall not be
construed as a waiver by District of any similar or other
failure by Applicant to comply with any term and condition of
this Agreement.
10. This Agreement shall be binding on the heirs, assigns, trans-
ferees, executors, successors, administrators and trustees of
the parties hereto.
0 0
IN WITNESS WHEREOF Applicant and District have executed this
Agreement on the day and year first hereinabove set forth.
Applicant
Applicant
ATTEST:
Michael Shelton Marge Mackey, President
Secretary Board of Directors,
Atascadero County Sanitation
District
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
Jeffrey G. Jorgensen Paul M. Sensibaugh
City Attorney Director of Public Works
City Engineer
_ 44
ol
N 530 19 E O
-
aa N �
d o v
N • o
to m w o
CZ Z6N • 0 DO p vNSi°9•E n
O D Z
Sr • _ ; scEicy y C NO Z OOOt
C y y H�J"" •� vN47'3716Ev � n
Zu/T fd� W N 47°�+'E
K C pl i1 ® m m 2208lb (?�
n w C% v
0 Z� ro 1 N41
NIro o
b a N 1
Z N � iO
•d �\ a9 �. � � Im � N
ss a+
0
i0
B
��
_Nro
y� asm v
j � A,.•sa� a � 3
A p
O � 3• vq
> p �$ N
afr / 0 010
y
Z 3 y�• � % z � y� Oslo
rD- Ch u 3 v
wrn s�
M�° ori
O m D
rn - L
D �0 o NO . J6 0 O
T
V �
7"
E3;N AGENDA
• MEMORANDUM
TO: Board of Directors
THROUGH: Mike Shelton, City Manager
FROM: Paul M. Sensibaugh, Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: Sewer Annexation - Curvado Circle
DATE: February 11, 1987
Recommendation:
Staff recommends that Council approve Resolution No- 23-87
annexing Lot 215 Block NC into the newly formed Improvement
District #4 (Seperado-Cayucos) .
Background:
Staff has received a request from the owner of the subject
parcel requesting annexation into Improvement District #4 due to
site conditions which preclude standard septic systems. The
options available to the owner are annexation into the sewer
district and connection to the public sewer , or construction of
an elaborate on-site disposal system which may have limited
functional life.
Mandatory Connection:
City ordinance makes it mandatory for parcels to connect
to a sanitary sewer within two (2) years of the time that the
sewer becomes available. The sewer is considered "available" if
it is constructed along the frontage with a dedicated right of
way or easement.
The owners of such a affected parcel has the right to
request a variance in writing to the Board. This variance may
for example be granted until such time as the septic system for
the parcel fails. Upon connection to the sewer system the parcel
will have to pay the annexation fee and run the service line at
private expense.
The developer may file for reimbursement from any future
connections into the line for which they fronted the costs.
Because District Ordinance makes it mandatory for parcels to
connect to a sewer line within two (2) years of the time it be-
comes available we have, by regulation, set a Public Hearing for
this item.
Fiscal Impact: •
There is no cost related to this annexation to the District.
All costs incurred in the line extension are to be paid by the
developer.
•
2
RESOLUTION NO. 23-87
A RESOLUTION OF THE ATASCADERO COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICT APPROVING EXTENDING PUBLIC SEWER SERVICE
TO LOT 215 BLOCK NC AND INCORPORATING THE AREA
CONCERNED INTO THE BOUNDARIES OF IMPROVEMENT
DISTRICT NO. 4
WHEREAS, the Atascadero County Sanitation District is
empowered by Section 4834 of the Health and Safety Code to annex
territory already a part of the County Sanitation District to the
Improvement District of that County Sanitation District; and
WHEREAS, Mr. & Mrs. Gallatin are the owners of the property
described in Exhibits A and B attached to this resolution; and
WHEREAS, said property, located on Curvado Circle in con-
tiguous with Improvement District #4; and
WHEREAS, said property is within the Urban Services Line on
the City' s Land Use and Circulation General Plan Map and is con-
sistant with the General Plan; and
WHEREAS, it is in the interest of the Atascadero County
Sanitaiton District to provide sewer service when consistant with
the General Plan; and
WHEREAS, the proposed project has received a Negative
Declaration pursuant to the provisions of the California Environ-
mental Quality Act; and
WHEREAS, Lot 215, Block NC will be required to design and
construct a sewer main extension at their expense prior to con-
nection and it appears feasible to do so;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Directors of the
Atascadero County Sanitation District as follows:
Section 1. The Board finds that the territory described in
this resolution will be benefitted by such sewer service (Health
and Safety Code section 4830) ;
Section 2. The Board approves the extension of public sewer
service to the following parcel, subject to the payment of
appropriate fees as listed in the Atascadero County Sanitation
District Code:
Lot 215 Block NC APN 28-292-16
Subject to the following_conditions:
a. Obtain all necessary plumbing and street encroachment
permits and execute a sewer main extension agreement.
b. Payment of all connection and annexation fees as
provided in the Atascadero County Sanitation District
Code in effect at the time of connection.
Section 3. The area included in APN 28-292-16, Lot 215
Block NC is hereby incorporated into the boundaries of
Improvement District No. 4.
On motion by Board Member and seconded by Board
Member , the foregoing resolution is adopted in
its entirety by the following roll call vote.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
DATE:
ATTEST: Atascadero County Sanitation District
MIKE SHELTON, Secretary MARJORIE R. MACKEY
President
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
JEFFREY G. JORGENSEN PAUL M. SENSIBAUGH
City Attorney Director of Public Works/
City Engineer
s
EXHIBIT A
Being a portion of the subdivision of the Atascadero Colony recorded
in the Office of the County Recorder, San Luis Obispo County, State of
California in Book 139 of Deeds, Page 261 Sheet 65A Amendment "V" to
Map of Atascadero Map Book 4 APN 28-292-16 Described herein as Lot
215 of Tract NC of the Atascadero Colony Subdivision the most Northerly
orner of said lot lying southwesterly to Dolores Avenue 195± feet on
Coling Avenue Formerly Curvado Circle. The northerly property line of
lot 215 being the most souther line of Lot 213 thence the most westerly
property line of said lto having a bearing 566° 03' 08" W 143± feet
thence the southerly property line of said lot which is also the most
northerly property line of Lot 216 thence along Colima Avenue 433± feet to
the point of beginning and the mostly northerly corner of Lot 215
EXHIBIT B
i
co 0
s
.a
y o
G
(D to S di°S/'q�If S�OSs Yo
E (D �Q733 57.
Kty �• oyi
Q ; 4
F
p
Fl
Ul ro
rt rt "G W•33 M y
Cal
O
rpt
rt o
26°05'26•E
IV - 9 W of eir.iy
Ln _ � -'fo 5.11°2 03 F.
in, Z ''
O
rt y(A oaf y Nto
ro O nl
o ymvm� ro 1 N O
CO ; 4
W
rt 9A
zo
06
ct
x.
CA <o s
�A Q
"• ?- 1Sep, 41"W - �A� -4 4A
_ p C OE• 44yi �hS1''O
0
to O i ,T4S y,D','9 V ^•,
`4 5 13057 09,W
4
Z h
r�D Z o
�ino0 z ~ �' � �— •
nop N
40
A , n
CQ <, M n ' W
m
ET
AG: ,NDA
MEMORANDUM ETs 7 II&A —
TO: Board of Directors
Atascadero County Sanitation District
THROUGH: Mike Shelton, City Manager
FROM: Paul Sensibaugh, Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: AUSD Reimbursement Agreement
DATE: February 18, 1987
Recommendation:
Staff recommends that the Board approve the attached
Reimbursement Agreement between the Atascadero County Sanitation
District and the Atascadero Unified School District.
Background:
At the November 24, 1986 Council meeting the Board entered
into an agreement to allow the Atascadero Unified School District
to extend a sanitary sewer main beyond the Urban Services Line to
the San Gabriel Road School site and to allow them to enter into
a reimbursement agreement.
Discussion:
• The agreement is similar to the one developed by the County
with one exception: The term requested here is for 15 years plus
a 5 year extension whereas the sewer ordinance indicated a 15
year term. The City/School Committee discussed this issue and
recommended that the extension be allowed under the relief clause
in the sewer ordinance.
Fiscal Impact:
The impact of the City consists of staff time for collection
of monies and tracking of conections. There is no capital outlay
or specific expenses to the City.
The impact to the AUSD could be very meaningful if the USL.
is shifted in the future to include the new sewer main.
The line was engineered by the schools to include future
potential connections, although the size' of the main did not need
to exceed our 8" minimum.
•
0
CITY OF ATASCADERO
(ACSD)
Sewer Extension Reimbursement Agreement
WHEREAS, on November 24 , 1986, the City of Atascadero
approved an agreement between the City and the Atascadero Unified
School District for the extension of the city sewer service to
the San Gabriel Road school site.
WHEREAS, on said date the City did adopt Resolution No.
131-86.
WHEREAS, Resolution 131-86 specified that the School
District shall be entitled to reimbursement under the terms of
the ordinance, Section 512.
NOW, THEREFORE, This agreement, made and entered into this
23rd day of February 1987 by the Atascadero Unfied School Dis-
trict in the County of San Luis Obispo, State of California,
hereinafter referred to as the District and the City of Atas-
cadero (ACSD) in the County of San Luis Obispo, California,
hereinafter referred to as the City.
WITNESSETH •
In consideration of the mutual promises, agreements,
covenants and conditions set forth herein, and in consideration
of the final approval of said sewer extension, the parties hereto
do hereby mutually covenant and agree as follows:
1. That the recitals set forth hereinabove are true, cor-
rect and valid.
2. That the District owns real property described as San
Gabriel Road Elementary School, 8500 San Gabriel Road,
Atascadero, CA 93422.
3. That in the construction of an approved sewer extension,
the District will award a bid to the lowest responsible
bidder for the construction of the approved sewer ex-
tension. The bid price, and any approved change orders,
and including engineering costs, minus the school front-
age, shall constitute the total funds expended which
shall be subject to recovery under the reimbursement
agreement.
4. That the District is entitled to refunds of portions of
said expensitures, from the time of completion of con-
struction, at such time within fifteen (15) years fol-
lowing the date of the execution of this Agreement as •
additional connections are made to said sewer extension,
from the following parcels:
2
• All Assessor ' s Block 8
54-151-13, 21, 25, 26, 29, 31, 33, 34 , 35, 36, 37, 38,
39, 40, 44, 45, 46.
54-241-02, 03, 18, 21, 22, 25, 27, 37.
54-231-18
56-351-19, 24, 33, 35.
The amount to be paid by each parcel, upon connection,
shall be an amount, based upon the comparative size of
each parcel (front footage) in relation to the total
size of all the above indicated parcels combined. This
same method of calculation shall also apply to any new
parcels created out of the territory comprising the
above indicated parcels after the effective date of this
agreement and continuing during the entire term thereof.
5. (a) The City will collect the amounts applicable in
Section 4 from the owners of real properties within
fifteen (15) years following the date of execution of
this agreement as permits are issued for connection of
said real properties to said sewer extension.
5. (b) If any portion subject to reimbursement has not
been reimbursed at the end of 15 years following the
date of execution of the agreement, the terms of the
agreement are extended for an additional five (5) years.
6. All monies collected in accordance with Item 5, above,
will be refunded to the District.
7. District further agrees to defend, indemnify and save
harmless the City of Atascadero (ACSD) and their of-
ficers, agents and employees from any and all liability,
claims, demands, costs, expenses, causes of action,
damages and judgments, of whatsoever kind and nature and
to whomsoever occurring, arising out of this Agreement
or occasioned by the performance or attempted perfor-
mance hereof, including but not limited to any act or -
omission to act on the part of the Distrct or its agents
or employees or independent contractors directly re-
sponsible to the Distict.
8. Neither party to this Agreement shall assign or transfer
this Agreement or any interest therein without the prior
written consent of the other party.
9. Any waiver by City of any failure by District to comply
with any term or condition of this Agreement shall not
be construed as a waiver by City of any similar or other
failure by the District to comply with any term and con-
dition of this Agreement.
10. This Agreement shall be binding on the heirs, assigns, .
transferees, executors, successors, administrators and
trustees of the parties hereto.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF City and District have executed this
Agreement on the day and year first hereinabove set forth.
ATTEST:
Approved as to Form:
Schools Legal Service Anthony Avina
Authorized Agent
Atascadero Unified School
Dist.
ATTEST:
BOYD C. SHARITZ MARJORIE. R. MACKEY
City Clerk President of the Board
Approved as to Form: Approved as to Content:
JEFFERY G. JORGENSEN PAUL M. SENSIBAUGH
City Attorney Director of Public Works