Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 07/11/2006 1918 19 CITY OF ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Tuesday, July 11, 2006 7:00 P.M. City Hall Council Chambers 6907 EI Camino Real Atascadero, California REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: 6:30 P.M. REGULAR SESSION: 7:00 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Council Member Clay ROLL CALL: Mayor O'Malley Mayor Pro Tem Pacas Council Member Clay Council Member Luna Council Member (Vacant) COMMUNITY FORUM: (This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wanting to address the Council on any matter not on this agenda and over which the Council has jurisdiction. Speakers are limited to five minutes. Please state your name for the record before making your presentation. The Council may take action to direct the staff to place a matter of business on a future agenda. A maximum of 30 minutes will be allowed for Community Forum, unless changed by the Council.) APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Roll Call 1 COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS: (On their own initiative, Council Members may make a brief announcement or a brief report on their own activities. Council Members may ask a question for clarification, make a referral to staff or take action to have staff place a matter of business on a future agenda. The Council may take action on items listed on the Agenda.) PRESENTATIONS: 1. Proclamation declaring July 2006 "Parks and Recreation Month." 2. Recognition of outgoing Council Member, Wendy Scalise. A. CONSENT CALENDAR: (All items on the consent calendar are considered to be routine and non-controversial by City staff and will be approved by one motion if no member of the Council or public wishes to comment or ask questions. If comment or discussion is desired by anyone, the item will be removed from the consent calendar and will be considered . in the listed sequence with an opportunity for any member of the public to address the Council concerning the item before action is taken.) 1. City Council Strategic Planning Workshop Meeting Minutes — June 5, 2006 ■ City Clerk Recommendation: Council approve the City Council Strategic Planning Workshop meeting minutes of June 5, 2006. [City Clerk] 2. City Council Meeting Minutes — June 13, 2006 ■ City Clerk Recommendation: Council approve the City Council meeting minutes of June 13, 2006. [City Clerk] 3. May 2006 Accounts Payable and Payroll ■ Fiscal Impact: $2,005,456.08. ■ Recommendation: Council approve certified City accounts payable, payroll and payroll vendor checks for May 2006. [Administrative Services] 4. May 2006 Investment Report ■ Fiscal Impact: None. ■ Recommendation: Council approve the Investment Report for May 2006. [City Treasurer] 5. Noise Ordinance Amendments/ZCH 2006-0116 (City of Atascadero) ■ Fiscal Impact: None. ■ Recommendation: Council adopt on second reading, by title only, Draft Ordinance approving Zone Change 2006-0116 Part A amending the noise ordinance pertaining to cost recovery. [Police] 2 6. 2006-2007 Annual Spending Limit ■ Fiscal Impact: None. ■ Recommendation: Council adopt the attached Draft Resolution establishing the annual spending limit for Fiscal Year 2006-2007. [Administrative Services] 7. Temporary Road Closure/San Fernando Road ■ Fiscal Impact: None. ■ Recommendation: Council approve the temporary road closure request from Mitch Frederick Paving to close a portion of San Fernando Road on one day during the week of July 17, 2006, between the hours of 8:30 a.m. —4:00 p.m. [Public Works] 8. Temporary Road Closure/Sunken Gardens Special Events ■ Fiscal Impact: $160.00 per event for the installation of Road Closed signs by Public Works staff. ■ Recommendation: Council approve the road closures for the Sunken Gardens special downtown events; Movies in the Park, Master's Chorale and Winter Wonderland. [Public Works] 9. Temporary Road Closure/ Hot El Camino Cruise Nite ■ Fiscal Impact: None. ■ Recommendation: Council approve the Draft Resolution authorizing the _ closure of EI Camino Real from Curbaril to Traffic Way on Friday, August 18, 2006, from 5:30 - 8:30 p.m. and the closure of East Mall, Palma and West Mall from 1:00 p.m. until 8:30 pm. [Community Services] 10. Temporary Road Closure/Sunken Gardens Flea Market ■ Fiscal Impact: None. ■ Recommendation: Council approve a request by the Community Services Department to close a portion Palma Avenue on Saturday, September 16, 2006 for the Sunken Gardens Flea Market. [Community Services] B. MANAGEMENT REPORTS: 1. Informational Item: 3-F Meadows (Oak Ridge Estates) Off Site Requirements ■ Fiscal Impact: There will be additional costs to the City if the Council accepts San Marcos Road for maintenance. ■ Recommendation: Informational item only, no staff recommendation at this time. [Public Works] 2. Human Service Grants ■ Fiscal Impact: The program is budgeted at $20,000. ■ Recommendation: Council approve Human Services Grants to the Agencies and in the amounts recommended by the Finance Committee in Attachment A. [City Manager] 3 3. Cardroom Ordinance / Consideration of Amendment to Increase the Maximum Number of Tables in a Cardroom ■ Fiscal Impact: None. ■ Recommendation: Council direct staff to submit the proposed Ordinance to the Division for Gambling Control for review and comment. [City Attorney] 4. Atascadero Recreation Center Complex Award (City Bid No. 2006-004) ■ Fiscal Impact: Total estimated expenditure of $7,750,000 from budgeted project funds. ■ Recommendations: Council: 1. Authorize the City Manager to execute a contract with the lowest responsible bidder in the amount to be determined at a bid opening on July 6, 2006 for construction of the new Atascadero Recreation Center Complex; and, 2. Appropriate additional funding to complete the desired project if costs exceed the funding available. [City Manager] 5. Study Session /Condominium Conversions ■ Fiscal Impact: Fiscal impact will vary depending upon the options implemented and the methods of implementation. ■ Recommendation: Council review the attached report and accompanying documentation and direct staff in the policy direction for review and recommendation of condominium conversion projects. [Community Development] 6. Designation of Voting Delegate — League of California Cities' Annual Conference ■ Fiscal Impact: None. ■ Recommendation: Council designate a voting representative and an alternate who will be present at the Annual Business Meeting of the League of California Cities' Annual Conference in September 2006, and direct the City Clerk to inform the League of the designation. [City Clerk] C. COMMITTEE & LIAISON REPORTS: (The following represent standing committees. Informative status reports will be given, as felt necessary): Mayor O'Malley 1. County Mayor's Round Table 2. Finance Committee 3. Air Pollution Control District (APCD) 4. Economic Vitality Corporation, Board of Directors (EVC) 5. League of California Cities — Grassroots Network 6. City/ Schools Committee 7. Economic Opportunity Commission (EOC) 8. SLO Council of Governments (SLOCOG) / S.L.O. Regional Transit Authority (SLORTA) 4 Mayor Pro Tem Pacas 1. Integrated Waste Management Authority (IWMA) 2. City/ Schools Committee 3. Atascadero Youth Task Force Council Member Clay 1. S.L.O. County Flood Control & Water Conservation District Water Resources Advisory Committee 2. Nacimiento Water Purveyors Contract Technical Advisory Group 3. North County Water Purveyors Group Council Member Luna 1. Finance Committee D. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION: 1. City Council 2. City Clerk 3. City Treasurer 4. City Attorney 5. City Manager E. ADJOURNMENT: Please note: Should anyone challenge any proposed development entitlement listed on this Agenda in court, that person may be limited to raising those issues addressed at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at or prior to this public hearing. Correspondence submitted at this public hearing will be distributed to the Council and available for review in the City Clerk's office. I, Shannon Sims, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Atascadero, declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing agenda for the July 11, 2006 Regular Session of the Atascadero City Council was posted on July 5, 2006 at the Atascadero City Hall, 6907 EI Camino Real, Atascadero, CA 93422 and was available for public review in the Customer Service Center at that location. Signed this 5th day of July, 2006 at Atascadero, California. � a '�S �o Shannon Sims, Deputy City Clerk City of Atascadero 5 City of Atascadero WELCOME TO THE ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL MEETING The City Council meets in regular session on the second and fourth Tuesday of each month at 7:00 p.m., at the City Hall Council Chambers, 6907 EI Camino Real, Atascadero. Matters are considered by the Council in the order of the printed Agenda: Copies of the staff reports or other documentation relating to each item of business referred to on the Agenda are on file in the office of the City Clerk and are available for public inspection during City Hall business hours at the Central Receptionist counter and on our website, www.atascadero.org. An agenda packet is also available for public review at the Atascadero Library, 6850 Morro Road. Contracts, Resolutions and Ordinances will be allocated a number once they are approved by the City Council. The minutes of this meeting will reflect these numbers. All documents submitted by the public during Council meetings that are either read into the record or referred to in their statement will be noted in the minutes and available for review in the City Clerk's office. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in a City meeting or other services offered by this City, please contact the City Manager's Office or the City Clerk's Office, both at (805) 470-3400. Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time when services are needed will assist the City staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting or service. TO SPEAK ON AGENDA ITEMS Members of the audience may speak on any item on the agenda. The Mayor will identify the subject, staff will give their report, and the Council will ask questions of staff. The Mayor will announce when the public comment period is open and will request anyone interested to address the Council regarding the matter being considered to step up to the podium. If you wish to speak for, against or comment in any way: • You must approach the podium and be recognized by the Mayor • Give your name and address (not required) • Make your statement • All comments should be made to the Mayor and Council • No person shall be permitted to make slanderous, profane or negative personal remarks concerning any other individual, absent or present • All comments limited to 5 minutes (unless changed by the Council) • No one may speak for a second time until everyone wishing to speak has had an opportunity to do so, and no one may speak more than twice on any item. If you wish to use a computer presentation to support your comments, you must notify the City Clerk's office at least 24 hours prior to the meeting. Access to hook up your laptop to the City's projector will be provided. You are required to submit to the City Clerk a printed copy of your presentation for the record. Please check in with the City Clerk before the meeting begins to announce your presence and turn in the printed copy. The Mayor will announce when the public comment period is closed, and thereafter, no further public comments will be heard by the Council. TO SPEAK ON SUBJECTS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA Under Agenda item, "COMMUNITY FORUM", the Mayor will call for anyone from the audience having business with the Council to: • Please approach the podium and be recognized • Give your name and address (not required) • State the nature of your business This is the time items not on the Agenda may be brought to the Council's attention. A maximum of 30 minutes will be allowed for Community Forum (unless changed by the Council). TO HAVE ITEMS PLACED ON AGENDA All business matters to appear on the Agenda must be in the Office of the City Manager 14 days preceding the Counciwa meeting. Should you have a matter you wish to bring before the Council, please mail or bring a written communication t dW the City Manager's office in City Hall prior to the deadline. 6 ■ City of Atascadero Proclamation "PARKS & RECREATION MONTH" JULY 2006 WHEREAS, the Parks and Recreation services in Atascadero "Create Community through People, Parks and Programs"; and WHEREAS, Parks and facilities help to give true quality of life to the community by preserving and protecting the natural and open space resources of Atascadero and providing organized programs and special events for it's citizens; and WHEREAS, Recreation, Parks and the Zoo support more productive workforces,. enhance the desirability of the City for business and families, and stimulate tourism revenues to increase a total community development model; and WHEREAS, Parks and Recreation facilities provide children with a safe refuge to play and grow, which is .important to reducing at-risk behaviors and enhancing public safety by employing prevention programs and providing developmental assets for youth; and WHEREAS, Parks and Recreation promotes health and wellness and reduces health care costs; and WHEREAS, Parks and Recreation fosters human development, helping young people develop and grow into healthy adults, and helping adults continue to live longer, and WHEREAS, Parks and Recreation facilitates community cohesion, problem solving and civic pride and WHEREAS, Thousands of Atascadero children, adults and visitors benefit from the wide range of services,facilities and programs provided by the Community Services & Public Works Departments; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that 1, Tom O'Malley, Mayor of the City of Atascadero, on behalf of the City Council, urges all residents to enjoy and recognize the social, physical, mental, economic, environmental and community benefits derived from our Parks and Recreation Programs, which provide something of value to everyone, and recognize July 2006 as "Parks and Recreation Month". WITNESS THE OFFICIAL SEAL OF THE CITY f '' SCADERO: 5 om Malley, �Wbrnia r City of Atascadero, July ll, 2006 ►. 7 i. ITEM NUMBER: A- 1 DATE: 07/11/06 lion an CITY OF ATASCADERO RHI , 0079 - \ CITY COUNCIL Strategic Planning Workshop Monday, June 5, 2006 6:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m. NOTES Mayor O'Malley called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. ROLL CALL: Present: Council Members Clay, Luna, Pacas, and Mayor O'Malley Absent: One vacancy Staff present: City Manager Wade McKinney, Assistant City Manager Jim Lewis, Assistant to the City Manager/City Clerk Marcia McClure Torgerson, Community Development Director Warren Frace, and City Attorney Patrick Enright. Mayor O'Malley asked for consensus to add the 101/41 interchange to the agenda. There was Council consensus to add the 101/41 interchange to this agenda. COMMUNITY FORUM: Eric Greening, made statements that expressed his thought concerning SLOCOG, transit issues, recognition of resigning Council Member Wendy Scalise, and AGP Video. David Broadwater, stated his interest in having Council meetings broadcasted, including discussion of PEG access channel and AGP Video as possible options. Mayor O'Malley closed the Community Forum. 8 Council Discussion Items: ♦ Council Strategic Initiatives o Enhance Public Safety o Improve the City's Financial Condition o Develop a Youth Center o Continue the Road Maintenance System o Repair City Hall City Manager Wade McKinney reviewed the Council's strategic initiatives Public Works Director Steve Kahn reviewed the 101/41 Interchange Value Analysis. He explained that he will be going to Sacramento on Thursday to ask for an extension. Mayor O'Malley stated that we will probably on receive a 12 month extension. There was Council consensus to support Mayor O'Malley's and Steve Kahn's efforts in Sacramento with their request for an extension. ♦ Broadcasting Council/Commission meetings Assistant to the City Manager Marcia Torgerson explained to the Council that staff is currently converting from taping meetings on cassettes to recording digitally. This will be more reliable, easier to archive, and easier to make available to the public. Staff will be able to place the digital recordings on our website, but they will be very large files to download. KPRL is not an option for Planning Commission meetings as the Paso Robles City Council meets and broadcasts on the same nights. There is currently no budget for video broadcasting or live streaming any meetings. There was Council consensus to direct staff to see if it is possible to have KPRL broadcast Council meetings past 10:30 p.m. There was Council consensus to direct staff to add a notation to the agendas and the website, stating that meetings are recorded and available to the public. ♦ Main Street requests City Manager Wade McKinney gave a summary of the Main St. requests listed on the agenda. Main St. Executive Director Steve Martin'explained each of the requests in detail to the Council. CC—SP Draft Notes 060506 Page 2 of 4 9 o Conditional Use Permit required for buildings under 10,000 sq. ft. There was Council consensus to bring this issue back as a Study Session. o Require monetary contribution to Main Street for businesses in excess of 100,000 sq. ft. outside of downtown There was Council consensus to bring this issue back as a Study Session. o Implement downtown lighting plan Mr. McKinney stated that Marcia Torgerson, the City's liaison with Main St. will be meeting with the Main St. Board to discuss a priority list for the installation of the new street lights in the Downtown. o Make downtown design guidelines regulatory instead of advisory There was Council discussion concerning this issue. The Council agreed that this can be included in the discussion at the Study Session concerning the possible requirement of a CUP for buildings under 10,000 sq.ft. o City use designation "Colony District" when referring to Main Street area in way finding signage and other information There was Council consensus to have Main St. conduct further discussion and return to the Council with a definite designation. o Change first floor zoning — no office use There was Council consensus to include this issue in the Main St Study Session. Recess 7:30 —7:40 p.m. ♦ Finance issues and priority review from Finance Committee City Manager Wade McKinney explained that the Finance Committee has been reviewing the budget to identify funds for unfunded projects. Mr. McKinney reviewed the unfunded project list with Council. ♦ Policies regarding staff involvement in Economic Development City Manager read the Finance Committee's policy on Economic Development. ♦ Review Resolution regarding appointment of the Mayor Council briefly discussed the issue of Mayor selection. CC—SP Draft Notes 060506 Page 3 of 4 10 Council directed City Attorney Pat Enright to come back to the Council with a revised Resolution. ♦ City Council vacancy City Clerk / Assistant to the City Manager Marcia Torgerson announced the resignation of Council Member Wendy Scalise as of May 29, 2006. She explained the Council has two choices; appoint a replacement within 30 days, or call for a Special Election. There was Council discussion on this matter. There was Council consensus to call for a Special Election. The Council directed the City Clerk to return to the Council with the appropriate Resolutions for a Special Election. ADJOURNMENT: Mayor O'Malley adjourned the meeting at 8:30 p.m., to the next regularly scheduled City Council meeting. Notes prepared by: Marcia McClure Torgerson, C.M.C., City Clerk CC—SP Draft Notes 060506 Page 4 of 4 11 ITEM NUMBER: A-2 DATE: 07/11/06 mill i ■ CITY OF ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES Tuesday, June 13, 2006 7:00 P.M. CLOSED SESSION: 6:31 p.m. (Immediately Following Redevelopment Agency Meeting) 1. PUBLIC COMMENT- CLOSED SESSION: None 2. CALL TO ORDER a. Conference with Legal Counsel Existing Litigation (Govt. Code Section 54956.9, subdivision (a)) City of Atascadero v. Thomas Dorsey SLO County Superior Court Case # CV04-0850 3. ADJOURN: 6:38 p.m. 4. CLOSED SESSION REPORT City Attorney Patrick Enright announced that there was no reportable action from the item in closed session. REGULAR SESSION: 7:00 P.M. Mayor O'Malley called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. and led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL: Present: Council Members Clay, Luna, Pacas and Mayor O'Malley CC Draft Minutes 06/13/06 Pagel of 8 12 Absent: None Others Present: City Clerk / Assistant to City Manager Marcia McClure Torgerson, Deputy City Clerk Grace Pucci Staff Present: City Manager Wade McKinney, Assistant City Manager Jim Lewis, Community Development Director Warren Frace, Public Works Director Steve Kahn, Community Services Director Brady Cherry, Fire Chief Kurt Stone and City Attorney Patrick Enright. COMMUNITY FORUM: Tom Colmeyer, spokesperson for Oppose Walmart, followed up on the public comments from the workshop meeting of May 30th and proposed that the City Council direct staff to prepare a zoning code amendment to include limitations on retail size and non-taxable merchandise. Eric Greening stated his agreement with the previous speaker, thanked Mayor O'Malley for signing the US Mayors Climate Protection Agreement and spoke about the next steps, questioned who was responsible for selecting a replacement for Council Member Scalise at LAFCO, and reported that the new interpretive specialist for the Anza Trail will be in northern San Luis Obispo County tomorrow afternoon through Thursday morning. Ursula Luna spoke about the compilation of written statements received by the city from the public regarding the Annex project and expressed concern with how comments were grouped under the specific categories of neutral, for, or against the project. Marilyn Brown stated she had spoken against Wal Mart at the May 30th meeting, but was listed as a neutral. For the record she is adamantly opposed to having a Wal Mart Super Center in Atascadero and wants her name taken off neutral and put under opposed. Ms. Brown submitted a copy of her statement of May 30, 2006. (Exhibit A) Robert Skinner stated he had spoken at the May 30th meeting and reiterated his opposition to Wal Mart. Geraldine Brasher stated she was opposed to Wal Mart, and asked if there would be a discussion tonight regarding filling the City Council vacancy. David Broadwater distributed a package of information regarding his attempts to find out the truth about city staff, Council and Planning Commissioners' communications and meetings with the Rottman Group who is the developer of the Annex, and with any potential retailers. (Exhibit B) Mr. Broadwater spoke about the contents of his handout. CC Draft Minutes 06/13/06 Page 2 of 8 13 Lee Perkins stated that her comments at the May 30th workshop were wrongly placed in the neutral category, as she is opposed to Wal Mart. She requested that future public workshops be held in a facility that will allow all those in attendance to be accommodated. Steve Tillman expressed his frustration that there is no real process in this community where people can be heard from, listened to and involved. Ann Ketcherside asked how the developers of the Annex had accumulated the property for the project. She also asked that bids not be taken for the Youth Center on Traffic Way and that another site be found, as she believes the ground is contaminated. Mitch Paskin thanked staff for their response and report on San Marcos Road. He also stated he was opposed to the rezoning for Wal Mart. Terril Graham spoke about his website and invited everyone to access it and see the issues he has presented regarding a writ he filed with the US Supreme Court. Mayor O'Malley closed the Community Forum period. Mayor O'Malley asked staff to address issues raised during the Community Forum period. Community Development Director Warren Frace explained that the tally of public comments from the May 30th workshop was provided as a summary for the Council and are rough tallies. The comments listed on the first two pages are in the order in which they were received. Assistant City Manger Jim Lewis reported that full phase one and two environmental analysis has been completed at the Youth Center site, and the city is awaiting a clearance letter from the County Health Department. Both the consultant and soils engineer have given their clearance. City Clerk Marcia McClure Torgerson explained that the City Council has directed her to prepare resolutions for calling a special election, coinciding with the November election, to fill the City Council vacancy. That issue and the proposed ballot measure have been agendized for the June 27th meeting. Ms. Torgerson also explained that she responds to public records requests daily, and suggested Mr. Broadwater make an appointment with her at which time they can talk about the records he has requested. City Manager Wade McKinney stated the LAFCO appointment is made by the City Selection Committee. MOTION: By Council Member Luna to direct staff to agendize an ordinance along the lines discussed by Mr. Colmeyer. CC Draft Minutes 06/13/06 Page 3 of 8 14 The motion failed for lack of a second. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: MOTION: By Council Member Luna and seconded by Council Member Clay to approve the agenda. Motion passed 4:0 by a roll-call vote. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS: Mayor O'Malley reported that he and Mayor Pro Tem Pacas have considered doing the City Manager's annual performance evaluation in house this year, and asked for Council discussion on how to proceed. There was Council Consensus for each Council Member to fill out their evaluation forms and individually submit them to the City Manager, then a closed session will be held at which time each Council Member can discuss their own forms if they wish. Mayor O'Malley announced that tonight is the first fundraiser Barbecue at the Lake and encouraged all to attend each week. He also reported that last Wednesday was the first farmers market in the Sunken Gardens. PRESENTATIONS: 1. Employee Service Award Presentation. City Manager Wade McKinney presented Roy Strong with a diamond pin for 25 years of service to the city. A. CONSENT CALENDAR: 1. City Council Meeting Minutes — May 9, 2006 ■ City Clerk Recommendation: Council approve the City Council meeting minutes of May 9, 2006. [City Clerk] 2. April 2006 Accounts Payable and Payroll ■ Fiscal Impact: $1,795,311.19. ■ Recommendation: Council approve certified City accounts payable, payroll and payroll vendor checks for April 2006. [Administrative Services] • CC Draft Minutes 06/13/06 Page 4 of 8 15 3. April 2006 Investment Report ■ Fiscal Impact: None. ■ Recommendation: Council approve the Investment Report for April 2006. [City Treasurer] 4. Engineer Contracts ■ Fiscal Impact: The costs of Engineering Services are billed directly to the capital project accounts. • Recommendation: Council authorize the City manager to enter into ongoing contracts for contract engineering services with the firms on the "General Engineering Services Qualified Firm List." [Public Works] Items pulled: David Broadwater, Item #A-1 MOTION: By Council Member Luna and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Pacas to approve Items #A-2, 3 and 4 Motion passed 4:0 by a roll-call vote. Item #A-1: Mr. Broadwater requested the following change to the Minutes of May 9, 2006: Page 2, first paragraph under Community Forum to read: "David Broadwater spoke about the Del Rio Road Annex project and his unsuccessful attempts to access information from city staff about #ie-pFejeet communications and meetinas with the Rottman Group. He recommended that Council ascertain for the citizens of Atascadero all information available about t4is pFajem city staff communications and meetinas with the Rottman Group and present it at the next City Council meeting. City Manager Wade McKinney stated he would follow up on what information has been received and prepare a memorandum to Council to that effect." Council Member Clay stated he would prefer to have the Clerk listen to the tape, make the corrections and then have Council approve the Minutes at the next meeting. MOTION: By Mayor O'Malley and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Pacas to approve Item #A-1 as amended. Motion passed 3:1 by a roll-call vote. (Clay opposed) B. MANAGEMENT REPORTS: 1. Hwy 101/41 Interchange Funding ■ Fiscal Impact: Unknown. Cost and options have not been fully reported by Caltrans and SLOCOG. ■ Recommendations: Council: 1. Receive a report from Staff on updated information on the Hwy 101/41 Interchange options, San Luis Obispo Council of Governments June CC Draft Minutes 06/13/06 Page 5 of 8 16 7th meeting and the California Transportation Commission June 8th meeting, and, 2. Direct Staff on the preferred option for the Hwy 101/41 Interchange Project. [Public Works] Public Works Director Steve Kahn gave the staff report and answered questions of Council. Steve Debuchensky, Planning Director for SLOCOG, explained how overages will be handled and stated that they are moving forward on this project. PUBLIC COMMENT Eric Greening spoke about the impacts to the downtown and increases in material and energy costs by choosing this alternative, which will take longer to construct than the roundabout. Richard Mullen spoke in favor of completing this project in a more traditional way, and against using a roundabout. He would like to see this move forward quickly to mitigate the traffic congestion at this intersection. Doug Sheffer asked if there were figures regarding the safety features for the two alternatives. Don Geissinger thanked Council for moving this project forward and outlined some of the drawbacks to utilizing a roundabout. He also spoke about a project extension on Marchant and suggested taking that out of the bid for Cal Trans and allowing him to do it on his own thereby creating a significant savings, which he would want to go to the city, not Cal Trans. Ann Ketcherside asked for clarification of the six month time schedule and stated that pedestrians and those in wheel chairs are not in favor of roundabouts. Mayor O'Malley closed the Public Comment period. MOTION: By Mayor O'Malley and seconded by Council Member Clay to approve the contribution of project funding shortfall of $900,000 and direct the Mayor to issue a letter to Cal Trans emphasizing the need for expediency. Motion passed 4;0 by a roll-call vote. 2. Acquisition of Paloma Park (045-323-001) ■ Fiscal Impact: The purchase of the park will cost up to $900,000. Funds are not available for purchase of the park. Staff is recommending that CC Draft Minutes 06/13/06 Page 6 of 8 17 $900,000 be advanced from park impact fees for purchase of the park. The advance will be repaid by development fees as they are collected in the future. ■ Recommendations: Council: 1. Adopt a Draft Resolution authorizing the purchase of Paloma Park from the State of California; and, 2. Approve the attached purchase agreement and purchase price, not to exceed $900,000; and, 3. Authorize the Administrative Services Director to appropriate $900,000 from the Park Impact Fees. [City Manager] Assistant City Manager Jim Lewis gave the staff report and answered questions of Council. PUBLIC COMMENT Sandy Jack, Parks and Recreation Commissioner, raised several questions including how the park impact fees are used, where they go and how they are spent, how long it would take to pay back the purchase price from developers fees, how much is estimated to be the buyers cost connected with the closing of this transaction, and are there any current plans to proceed with development of any of the added acreage that would be part of the park. Mayor O'Malley closed the Public Comment period. City Manager McKinney and Assistant City Manager Lewis addressed Mr. Jack's questions. MOTION: By Council Member Clay and seconded by Council Member Luna to adopt a Draft Resolution authorizing the purchase of Paloma Park from the State of California; and, approve the attached purchase agreement and purchase price, not to exceed $900,000; and, authorize the Administrative Services Director to appropriate $900,000 from the Park Impact Fees. Motion passed 4:0 by a roll-call vote. (item #B-2.1 Resolution No. 2006-061, Item #B-2.2 Contract No. 2006-025) C. COMMITTEE & LIAISON REPORTS: None CC Draft Minutes 06/13/06 Page 7 of 8 18 D. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION: City Council Council Member Clay spoke in support of City Clerk Torgerson and of her efficiency, helpfulness and dependability. He asked Public Works Director Steve Kahn to give an update on San Gabriel Road. Director Kahn reported that the design had been completed and submitted to Cal Trans and the city is waiting for the encroachment permit from Cal Trans. Regarding the rezoning at Del Rio Road and EI Camino Real, Council Member Clay stated he would prefer to see an independent survey or vote of the people to determine what they really want. Mayor O'Malley stated his agreement with Council Member Clay regarding City Clerk Torgerson who he believes is competent and does an outstanding job for the city and community, and commended her as a role model for city staff. E. ADJOURNMENT: Mayor O'Malley adjourned the meeting at 8:50 p.m. to the next regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council on June 27, 2006. MINUTES PREPARED BY: Grace Pucci, Deputy City Clerk The following exhibits are available for review in the City Clerk's office: Exhibit A—Marilyn Brown, statement from meeting of May 30th Exhibit B—David Broadwater, chronology of requests for information and summary of responses CC Draft Minutes 06/13/06 19 Page 8 of 8 ITEM NUMBER: A - 3 DATE: 07/11/06 1918 A 1979 Atascadero City Council Staff Report - Administrative Services Department May 2006 Accounts Payable and Payroll RECOMMENDATION: Council approve certified City accounts payable, payroll and payroll vendor checks for May 2006. DISCUSSION: Attached for City Council review and approval are the following: Payroll Dated 5/4/06 Checks # 22655 - 22706 $ 50,316.64 Direct Deposits 180,673.41 Dated 5/18/06 Checks # 22707 - 22758 49,617.47 Direct Deposits 174,895.32 Accounts Payable Dated 5/1/06 - 5/31/06 Checks # 105240 - 105611 & EFTs 420 -436 1,549,953.24 TOTAL AMOUNT $ 2,005,456.08 FISCAL IMPACT: Total expenditures for all funds is $ 2,005,456.08 CERTIFICATION: The undersigned certifies that the attached demands have been released for payment and that funds are available for these demands Rachelle Rickard, Dire for of Administrative Services ATTACHMENT: May 2006 Eden Warrant Register in the amount of $ 1,549,953.24 20 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of May 2006 Check Check Number Date Vendor Description Amount 420 05/03/2006 MID-STATE BANK Accounts Payable Check 91.00 421 05/03/2006 MID-STATE BANK Accounts Payable Check 80.00 422 05/03/2006 MID-STATE BANK Accounts Payable Check 120.00 423 05/03/2006 MID-STATE BANK Accounts Payable Check 40.00 424 05/03/2006 MID-STATE BANK Accounts Payable Check 30.00 425 05/03/2006 MID-STATE BANK Accounts Payable Check 30.00 426 05/03/2006 MID-STATE BANK Accounts Payable Check 20.00 427 05/03/2006 MID-STATE BANK Accounts Payable Check 30.00 428 05/03/2006 MID-STATE BANK Accounts Payable Check 40.00 429 05/03/2006 MID-STATE BANK Accounts Payable Check 30.00 430 05/03/2006 MID-STATE BANK Accounts Payable Check 20.00 431 05/03/2006 MID-STATE BANK Accounts Payable Check 40.00 432 05/03/2006 MID-STATE BANK Accounts Payable Check 137.52 105256 05/04/2006 ATASCADERO COMMUNITY Accounts Payable Check 31,133.00 105257 05/04/2006 ATASCADERO TRAFFIC WAY STORAGE Accounts Payable Check 647.00 105258 05/04/2006 BRADY CHERRY Accounts Payable Check 300.0 105259 05/04/2006 JERRY L.CLAY Accounts Payable Check 75. 105260 05/04/2006 WARREN FRACE Accounts Payable Check 300.00 105264 05/04/2006 I.M.P.A.C.GOVERNMENT SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 21,551.53 105265 05/04/2006 STEVEN KAHN Accounts Payable Check 300.00 105266 05/04/2006 JAMES R. LEWIS Accounts Payable Check 250.00 105267 05/04/2006 GEORGE W. LUNA Accounts Payable Check 75.00 105268 05/04/2006 WADE MCKINNEY Accounts Payable Check 500.00 105269 05/04/2006 THOMAS P. O'MALLEY Accounts Payable Check 75.00 105270 05/04/2006 BECKY J. PACAS Accounts Payable Check 75.00 105271 05/04/2006 RACHELLE RICKARD Accounts Payable Check 300.00 105272 05/04/2006 WENDY SCALISE Accounts Payable Check 75.00 105240 05/05/2006 ATASCADERO FIRE EMPLOYEE ASSN. Payroll Vendor Payment 665.00 105241 05/05/2006 ATASCADERO MID MGRS ORG UNION Payroll Vendor Payment 20.00 105242 05/05/2006 ATASCADERO POLICE OFFICERS ASN Payroll Vendor Payment 582.42 105243 05/05/2006 FAMILY SUPPORT DIVISION Payroll Vendor Payment 207.69 105244 05/05/2006 EMPLOYMENT DEV DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 8,770.05 105245 05/05/2006 EMPLOYMENT DEV. DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 851 105246 05/05/2006 EMPLOYMENT DEV.DEPARTMENT Accounts Payable Check 2,757. 21 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of May 2006 Check Check Number Date Vendor Description Amount 105247 05/05/2006 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE Payroll Vendor Payment 10,878.83 105248 05/05/2006 ICMA Accounts Payable Check 125.00 105249 05/05/2006 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 Payroll Vendor Payment 854.88 105250 05/05/2006 KENNEDY CLUB FITNESS Payroll Vendor Payment 66.00 105251 05/05/2006 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION Payroll Vendor Payment 370.58 105252 05/05/2006 PERS LONG TERM CARE PROGRAM Payroll Vendor Payment 16.19 105253 05/05/2006 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM Payroll Vendor Payment 68,354.63 105254 05/05/2006 SEIU LOCAL 620 Payroll Vendor Payment 679.78 105255 05/05/2006 UNITED WAY OF SLO COUNTY Payroll Vendor Payment 31.00 433 05/09/2006 MID-STATE BANK Payroll Vendor Payment 38,123.94 105273 05/09/2006 AFLAC Payroll Vendor Payment 3,374.40 105274 05/09/2006 BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA Payroll Vendor Payment 93,350.70 105275 05/09/2006 BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA Payroll Vendor Payment 1,722.71 105276 05/09/2006 DELTA DENTAL,ATTN:ACCOUNTING Payroll Vendor Payment 7,700.26 105277 05/09/2006 THE STANDARD UNIT 22 Payroll Vendor Payment 966.81 105278 05/09/2006 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE CO. Payroll Vendor Payment 624.68 105279 05/12/2006 A&T ARBORISTS Accounts Payable Check 2,100.00 105280 05/12/2006 AGP VIDEO Accounts Payable Check 100.00 105281 05/12/2006 AHERN RENTALS Accounts Payable Check 282.50 105282 05/12/2006 ALLSTAR FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC. Accounts Payable Check 3,072.00 105283 05/12/2006 ALTHOUSE& MEADE, INC. Accounts Payable Check 499.45 105284 05/12/2006 AMERICAN MARBORG Accounts Payable Check 85.16 105285 05/12/2006 AMERICAN TRAINCO, INC. Accounts Payable Check 790.00 105286 05/12/2006 API,ATLAS PERFORMANCE INDUST Accounts Payable Check 205.00 105287 05/12/2006 APPLIED ENGINEERING Accounts Payable Check 1,362.50 105288 05/12/2006 AQUAMARK POOL CARE Accounts Payable Check 199.13 105289 05/12/2006 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 323.25 105290 05/12/2006 ARCH Accounts Payable Check 411.07 105291 05/12/2006 GINA ARIAS Accounts Payable Check 20.92 105292 05/12/2006 AT&T Accounts Payable Check 49.54 105293 05/12/2006 AT&T Accounts Payable Check 762.55 105294 05/12/2006 ATASCADERO FORD Accounts Payable Check 10.15 105296 05/12/2006 ATASCADERO MUTUAL WATER CO. Accounts Payable Check 2,230.35 105297 05/12/2006 ATASCADERO SAW SHOP Accounts Payable Check 88.47 105298 05/12/2006 ATASCADERO UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST Accounts Payable Check 60,000.00 22 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of May 2006 Check Check Number Date Vendor Description Amount 105299 05/12/2006 DAVID ATHEY Accounts Payable Check 140.00 105300 05/12/2006 AVAYA INC. Accounts Payable Check 22.42 105301 05/12/2006 BANGERT CONSULTING Accounts Payable Check 3,656.86 105302 05/12/2006 ANN BANKS Accounts Payable Check 20.00 105303 05/12/2006 BATTERY SYSTEMS Accounts Payable Check 20.00 105304 05/12/2006 BAUER COMPRESSORS Accounts Payable Check 154.28 105305 05/12/2006 SHERRY BAZZELL Accounts Payable Check 20.00 105306 05/12/2006 BEN FRANKLIN PLUMBING Accounts Payable Check 53.00 105307 05/12/2006 CINDY K. BENSON Accounts Payable Check 1,107.40 105308 05/12/2006 BLUE RIDGE MEDICAL INC Accounts Payable Check 253.45 105309 05/12/2006 BOUND TREE MEDICAL, LLC Accounts Payable Check 256.72 105310 05/12/2006 BRADS OVERHEAD DOORS, INC. Accounts Payable Check 65.00 105311 05/12/2006 BRENDLER JANITORIAL SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 1,035.00 105312 05/12/2006 DAVID W. BROWN PAINTING Accounts Payable Check 457.45 105313 05/12/2006 BRIDGET BURNS Accounts Payable Check 12.67 105314 05/12/2006 BURTON'S FIRE, INC. Accounts Payable Check 2,421.26 105315 05/12/2006 CA MUNICIPAL REV.&TAX ASSC. Accounts Payable Check 50.0 is 105316 05/12/2006 CAL-COAST REFRIGERATION, INC Accounts Payable Check 411.00 105317 05/12/2006 CAL-STATE AUTO GLASS Accounts Payable Check 249.14 105318 05/12/2006 CALIFORNIA PARKS&RECREATION Accounts Payable Check 415.00 105319 05/12/2006 CALVARY CHAPEL OF ATASCADERO Accounts Payable Check 90.00 105320 05/12/2006 GABE CANDELA Accounts Payable Check 40.00 105321 05/12/2006 CED CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL Accounts Payable Check 284.74 105322 05/12/2006 CENTRAL COAST CONTAINERS Accounts Payable Check 150.00 105323 05/12/2006 CENTRAL VALLEY TOXICOLOGY Accounts Payable Check 60.00 105324 05/12/2006 CHEM CLEAN Accounts Payable Check 492.81 105325 05/12/2006 CHICAGO GRADE LANDFILL Accounts Payable Check 80.00 105326 05/12/2006 JOSEPH CHOUINARD P.E. Accounts Payable Check 7,487.71 105327 05/12/2006 CINGULAR WIRELESS Accounts Payable Check 88.88 105328 05/12/2006 TIMOTHY CLEAVER Accounts Payable Check 80.00 105329 05/12/2006 COAST ELECTRONICS Accounts Payable Check 2,788.38 105330 05/12/2006 COASTAL COPY, LP Accounts Payable Check 65.60 105331 05/12/2006 COASTLINE EQUIPMENT Accounts Payable Check 1,111.11, 105332 05/12/2006 JOHN COUCH Accounts Payable Check 80.0 105333 05/12/2006 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER Accounts Payable Check 88.( 105334 05/12/2006 CSK AUTO, INC. Accounts Payable Check 81.28 23 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of May 2006 Check Check Number Date Vendor Description Amount 105335 . 05/12/2006 CUSTOM DESIGN SOFTWARE, INC. Accounts Payable Check 5,075.00 105336 05/12/2006 DAN DAVIS Accounts Payable Check 493.50 105337 05/12/2006 DARREN DAVIS Accounts Payable Check 1,850.00 105338 05/12/2006 DECOU LUMBER COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 259.11 105339 05/12/2006 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Accounts Payable Check 2,249.00 105340 05/12/2006 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Accounts Payable Check 1,481.26 105341 05/12/2006 DOGGIE WALK BAGS COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 134.69 105342 05/12/2006 DRIVER ALLIANT INSURANCE SVC Accounts Payable Check 633.77 105343 05/12/2006 EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC Accounts Payable Check 110.00 105344 05/12/2006 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS Accounts Payable Check 79.64 105345 05/12/2006 FEDERAL EXPRESS Accounts Payable Check 21.97 105346 05/12/2006 FENCE FACTORY ATASCADERO Accounts Payable Check 42.42 105347 05/12/2006 FERRELL'S AUTO REPAIR Accounts Payable Check 286.60 105348 05/12/2006 FOOD FOR LESS Accounts Payable Check 49.80 105349 05/12/2006 FRAZEE INDUSTRIES, INC. Accounts Payable Check 28.31 105350 05/12/2006 GEM AUTO PARTS Accounts Payable Check 426.82 105351 05/12/2006 MIKE GIL Accounts Payable Check 119.00 105352 05/12/2006 GILBERTS LANDSCAPES Accounts Payable Check 5,330.00 105353 05/12/2006 GOLDEN STATE COPIER&MAILING Accounts Payable Check 31.06 105354 05/12/2006 GOLDING CONCRETE SAWING Accounts Payable Check 187.50 105355 05/12/2006 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION, INC. Accounts Payable Check 164,901.53 105356 05/12/2006 GRISANTI HARDWARE Accounts Payable Check 19.38 105357 05/12/2006 H.D. PETERSON Accounts Payable Check 657.71 105358 05/12/2006 BRIAN J. HAMPTON Accounts Payable Check 221.00 105359 05/12/2006 ASHLEY HARRIS Accounts Payable Check 14.95 105360 05/12/2006 HART IMPRESSIONS PRINT&COPY Accounts Payable Check 216.33 105361 05/12/2006 TRAVIS HASCH Accounts Payable Check 107.00 105362 05/12/2006 HSM ELECTRONIC PROTECTION SCVS Accounts Payable Check 95.00 105363 05/12/2006 INDUSTRIAL TRUCK BODIES Accounts Payable Check 2,482.14 105364 05/12/2006 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Accounts Payable Check 393.68 105365 05/12/2006 INGLIS PET HOTEL, Accounts Payable Check 349.12 105366 05/12/2006 EVELYN INGRAM Accounts Payable Check 735.00 105367 05/12/2006 JESPERSEN'S TIRE SERVICE, INC. Accounts Payable Check 1,538.20 105368 05/12/2006 JIFFY LUBE/SOUND BILLING Accounts'Payable Check 105.80 105369 05/12/2006 LANDSCAPES BY STACH Accounts Payable Check 570.00 24 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of May 2006 Check Check Number Date Vendor Description Amount 105370 05/12/2006 VOID Accounts Payable Check 0.00 105371 05/12/2006 LIFE ASSIST, INC. Accounts Payable Check 244.55 105372 05/12/2006 DAVID J. LODEN Accounts Payable Check 68.00 105373 05/12/2006 LYNDON'S AUTOMOTIVE Accounts Payable Check 349.83 105374 05/12/2006 DAVID C. MAIN,AIA Accounts Payable Check 2,000.00 105375 05/12/2006 MAINTENANCE SUPERINTENDENT ASC Accounts Payable Check 30.00 105376 05/12/2006 KERRY MARGASON Accounts Payable Check 48.06 105377 05/12/2006 MARK SIMON SEWER MAINTENANCE Accounts Payable Check 19,240.00 105378 05/12/2006 MATHIS&ASSOCIATES Accounts Payable Check 16,993.25 105379 05/12/2006 WADE MCKINNEY Accounts Payable Check 162.76 105380 05/12/2006 CORY MEYER Accounts Payable Check 80.00 105381 05/12/2006 MID-COAST MOWER&SAW Accounts Payable Check 1,084.99 105382 05/12/2006 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE Accounts Payable Check 158.66 105383 05/12/2006 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 66.32 105384 05/12/2006 MICHAL S. MOSES Accounts Payable Check 790.80 105385 05/12/2006 MSA 06 Accounts Payable Check 475.00 105386 05/12/2006 NATIONAL STAFFING LLC Accounts Payable Check 1,137.60 105387 05/12/2006 NEW EDGE NETWORKS TRANSEDGE Accounts Payable Check 284.15 105388 05/12/2006 NORTH COAST ENGINEERING INC. Accounts Payable Check 80.00 105389 05/12/2006 NORTHERN ENERGY Accounts Payable Check 164.62 105390 05/12/2006 NOWDOCS INTERNATIONAL, INC. Accounts Payable Check 240.21 105391 05/12/2006 OFFICE DEPOT INC. Accounts Payable Check 1,275.80 105392 05/12/2006 OUTLET TOOL SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 18.89 105393 05/12/2006 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC Accounts Payable Check 10.36 105394 05/12/2006 PALOMAR HOMES Accounts Payable Check 880.00 105395 05/12/2006 PAVEMENT ENGINEERING, INC. Accounts Payable Check 5,905.00 105396 05/12/2006 PFEIFFER PARTNERS, INC. Accounts Payable Check 225.00 105397 05/12/2006 PFLUM'S ATASCADERO MUFFLER Accounts Payable Check 148.00 105398 05/12/2006 KAREN POLAND Accounts Payable Check 12.86 105399 05/12/2006 PROCARE JANITORIAL SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 690.85. 105400 05/12/2006 PROGRESSIVE MEDICAL INTERNATIO Accounts Payable Check 53.56 105401 05/12/2006 PRW STEEL SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 585.80 105402 05/12/2006 PSOMAS Accounts Payable Check 9,834.45 105403 05/12/2006 GRACE L.PUCCI Accounts Payable Check 210.00 105404 05/12/2006 QUILL CORPORATION Accounts Payable Check 32.0io 105405 05/12/2006 RECOGNITION WORKS Accounts Payable Check 101.93 25 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of May 2006 Check Check umber Date Vendor Description Amount 105406 05/12/2006 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY SHERIFF Accounts Payable Check 11,192.50 105407 05/12/2006 SAN LUIS SECURITY Accounts Payable Check 972.00 105408 05/12/2006 SANTA MARIA TIRE, INC. Accounts Payable Check 273.00 105409 05/12/2006 SANTA MARIA TOOL, INC. Accounts Payable Check 1,117.42 105410 05/12/2006 SBC SMART YELLOW PAGES Accounts Payable Check 223.00 105411 05/12/2006 SBC/MCI Accounts Payable Check 501.86 105412 05/12/2006 JOHN SIEMENS Accounts Payable Check 96.15 105413 05/12/2006 SIGN OUTLET Accounts Payable Check 209.14 105414 05/12/2006 DAVID L.SMAW Accounts Payable Check 119.00 105415 05/12/2006 SOUZA CONSTRUCTION INC. Accounts Payable Check 11,519.05 105416 05/12/2006 STAPLES CREDIT PLAN Accounts Payable Check 1,496.23 105417 05/12/2006 SUNLIGHT JANITORIAL Accounts Payable Check 3,315.40 105418 05/12/2006 SUPERIOR QUALITY COPIERS, INC. Accounts Payable Check 54.76 105419 05/12/2006 T.A.P.S.TRUCK ACCESSORY OUTLT Accounts Payable Check 2,188.48 105420 05/12/2006 TAYLOR RENTAL CENTER Accounts Payable Check 78.06 105421 05/12/2006 TEMPLETON UNIFORMS Accounts Payable Check 56.61 105422 05/12/2006 TIME WARNER TELECOM Accounts Payable Check 1,447.42 105423 05/12/2006 TOWN &COUNTRY FENCING Accounts Payable Check 10,934.00 105424 05/12/2006 U.S. POSTAL SERVICE/NEOPOST Accounts Payable Check 5,000.00 105425 05/12/2006 U.S. POSTMASTER Accounts Payable Check 571.20 105426 05/12/2006 UNION ASPHALT, INC. Accounts Payable Check 2,300.29 105427 05/12/2006 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO Accounts Payable Check 125,328.94 105428 05/12/2006 UNITED STAFFING ASSOCIATES Accounts Payable Check 3,803.25 105429 05/12/2006 UPS Accounts Payable Check 58.26 105430 05/12/2006 VALLEY PACIFIC PETROLEUM SVCS Accounts Payable Check 427.91 105431 05/12/2006 VERIZON WIRELESS Accounts Payable Check 753.84 105432 05/12/2006 WALLACE GROUP Accounts Payable Check 607.45 105433 05/12/2006 SUSAN M.WILLIAMS Accounts Payable Check 52.57 105434 05/12/2006 WORKHOUSE Accounts Payable Check 64.24 105435 05/12/2006 WYSONG CONSTRUCTION Accounts Payable Check 12,490.00 105436 05/12/2006 WYSONG CONSTRUCTION Accounts Payable Check 819.00 105437 05/19/2006 ATASCADERO FIRE EMPLOYEE ASSN. Payroll Vendor Payment 665.00 105438 05/19/2006 ATASCADERO MID MGRS ORG UNION Payroll Vendor Payment 20.00 105439 05/19/2006 ATASCADERO POLICE OFFICERS ASN Payroll Vendor Payment 582.42 105440 05/19/2006 AXA EQUITABLE Payroll Vendor Payment 371.15 26 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of May 2006 Check Check Number Date- Vendor Description Amount 105441 05/19/2006 FAMILY SUPPORT DIVISION Payroll Vendor Payment 207.69 105442 05/19/2006 CITIPAC Payroll Vendor Payment 30.00 105443 05/19/2006 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE Payroll Vendor Payment 10,878.83 105444 05/19/2006 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 Payroll Vendor Payment 854.88 105445 05/19/2006 KENNEDY CLUB FITNESS Payroll Vendor Payment 66.00 105446 05/19/2006 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION Payroll Vendor Payment 391.33 105447 05/19/2006 PERS LONG TERM CARE PROGRAM Payroll Vendor Payment 16.19 105448 05/19/2006 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTED Payroll Vendor Payment 67,637.90 105449 05/19/2006 SEIU LOCAL 620 Payroll Vendor Payment 673.13 105450 05/19/2006 UNITED WAY OF SLO COUNTY Payroll Vendor Payment 31.00 434 05/22/2006 EMPLOYMENT DEV.DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 838.19 435 05/22/2006 EMPLOYMENT DEV DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 8,224.87 436 05/23/2006 MID-STATE BANK Payroll Vendor Payment 36,391.82 105451 05/26/2006 A-JAY EXCAVATING, INC. Accounts Payable Check 112.70 105452 05/26/2006 AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT Accounts Payable Check 1,107.23 105453 05/26/2006 ALL ABOUT PRODUCE,CORP. Accounts Payable Check 832.600 105454 05/26/2006 ALL PLUMBING Accounts Payable Check 105.00 105455 05/26/2006 AMERICAN MARBORG Accounts Payable Check 72.77 105456 05/26/2006 ANTECH DIAGNOSTICS Accounts Payable Check 519.25 105457 05/26/2006 PAULA ANTON Accounts Payable Check 35.00 105458 05/26/2006 API,ATLAS PERFORMANCE INDUST Accounts Payable Check 205.00 105459 05/26/2006 AQUAMARK POOL CARE Accounts Payable Check 521.08 105460 05/26/2006 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 850.28 105461 05/26/2006 ASSOCIATION OF ZOO&AQUARIUM Accounts Payable Check 25.00 105462 05/26/2006 AT&T Accounts Payable Check 363.89 105463 05/26/2006 ATASCADERO COMMUNITY Accounts Payable Check 31,133.00 105464 05/26/2006 ATASCADERO FORD Accounts Payable Check 2,094.67 105465 05/26/2006 ATASCADERO MUTUAL WATER CO. Accounts Payable Check 88.40 105466 05/26/2006 ATASCADERO SAW SHOP Accounts Payable Check 37.00 105467 05/26/2006 - ATASCADERO TRAFFIC WAY STORAGE Accounts Payable Check 647.00 105468 05/26/2006 AVAYA INC. Accounts Payable Check 22.42 105469 05/26/2006 BASSETT'S CRICKET RANCH,INC. Accounts Payable Check 101.70 105470 05/26/2006 BATTERY SYSTEMS Accounts Payable Check 126.40 105471 05/26/2006 BELL'S PLUMBING REPAIR, INC. Accounts Payable Check 112.50 27 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of May 2006 Check Check umber Date Vendor Description Amount 105472 05/26/2006 JUSTIN BLACK Accounts Payable Check 130.00 105473 05/26/2006 BLUEPRINTER Accounts Payable Check 388.03 105474 05/26/2006 CALIFORNIA CODE CHECK Accounts Payable Check 27,919.08 105475 05/26/2006 CALIFORNIA NARCOTIC OFFC ASSC Accounts Payable Check 75.00 105476 05/26/2006 CANNON ASSOCIATES Accounts Payable Check 4,900.97 105477 05/26/2006 CENTRAL COAST STRIPING, INC. Accounts Payable Check 1,400.00 105478 05/26/2006 CENTRAL COAST WATER TREATMENT Accounts Payable Check 140.00 105479 05/26/2006 CHEM CLEAN Accounts Payable Check 300.20 105480 05/26/2006 BRADY CHERRY Accounts Payable Check 300.00 105481 05/26/2006 JERRY L. CLAY Accounts Payable Check 75.00 105482 05/26/2006 CLEAN WATER SYSTEMS, INC. Accounts Payable Check 35.00 105483 05/26/2006 COASTAL COPY, LP Accounts Payable Check 290.63 105484 05/26/2006 COASTAL IMAGING SUPPLIES Accounts Payable Check 208.07 105485 05/26/2006 CONWAY DISTRIBUTORS Accounts Payable Check 79.30 105486 05/26/2006 COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO Accounts Payable Check 3,790.38 105487 05/26/2006 CREDIT BUREAU Accounts Payable Check 34.71 . 105488 05/26/2006 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER Accounts Payable Check 230.29 105489 05/26/2006 CTM GROUP,INC. Accounts Payable Check 80.15 105490 05/26/2006 DECOU LUMBER COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 102.63 105491 05/26/2006 DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY& FIRE Accounts Payable Check 145.00 105492 05/26/2006 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Accounts Payable Check 2,077.00 105493 05/26/2006 DIAMONDBACK FIRE&RESCUE, INC Accounts Payable Check 5,636.64 105494 05/26/2006 DIAMONDBACK TACTICAL Accounts Payable Check 2,293.44 105495 05/26/2006 DRIVER ALLIANT INSURANCE SVC Accounts Payable Check 342.13 105496 05/26/2006 ED'S FLY MEAT, INC. Accounts Payable Check 47.00 105497 05/26/2006 ELLIOTTS PHARMACY Accounts Payable Check 30.00 105498 05/26/2006 ESCUELA DEL RIO Accounts Payable Check 129.60 105499 05/26/2006 FARM SUPPLY COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 93.77 105500 05/26/2006 FENCE FACTORY ATASCADERO Accounts Payable Check 127.14 105501 05/26/2006 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, INC. Accounts Payable Check 169.65 105502 05/26/2006 FERRELL'S AUTO REPAIR Accounts Payable Check 155.20 105503 05/26/2006 FGL ENVIRONMENTAL Accounts Payable Check 269.00 105504 05/26/2006 FIRE MAINTENANCE COMPANY,LLC Accounts Payable Check 30.00 105505 05/26/2006 FOOD FOR LESS Accounts Payable Check 677.05 • 105506 05/26/2006 WARREN FRACE Accounts Payable Check 300.00 105507 05/26/2006 FRAZEE INDUSTRIES, INC. Accounts Payable Check 14.75 28 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of May 2006 Check Check Number Date Vendor Description Amount 105508 05/26/2006 THOMAS E. GANDY Accounts Payable Check 520.00 105509 05/26/2006 GAS COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 1,069.31 105510 05/26/2006 VOID Accounts Payable Check 0.00 105511 05/26/2006 GEM AUTO PARTS Accounts Payable Check 700.91 105512 05/26/2006 GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTATION Accounts Payable Check 52.08 105513 05/26/2006 GEO-WEST LAND CONSULTANTS, INC Accounts Payable Check 1,055.00 105514 05/26/2006 MIKE GIL Accounts Payable Check 85.00 105515 05/26/2006 GILBERT'S LANDSCAPES Accounts Payable Check 8,500.00 105516 05/26/2006 GRAY LIFT, INC. Accounts Payable Check 204.72 105517 05/26/2006 GRISANTI HARDWARE Accounts Payable Check 177.64 105518 05/26/2006 BRIAN J. HAMPTON Accounts Payable Check 136.00 105519 05/26/2006 HART IMPRESSIONS PRINT&COPY Accounts Payable Check 340.01 105520 05/26/2006 MEREDITH HENDRICKSON Accounts Payable Check 115.70 105521 05/26/2006 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Accounts Payable Check 257.24 105522 05/26/2006 JILL A. IVIE Accounts Payable Check 51.00 105523 05/26/2006 J.CARROLL Accounts Payable Check 888.94 105524 05/26/2006 JAMS, INC. Accounts Payable Check 5,300.00• 105525 05/26/2006 JIFFY LUBE/SOUND BILLING Accounts Payable Check 234.31 105526 05/26/2006 STEVEN KAHN Accounts Payable Check 300.00 105527 05/26/2006 KPRL 1230 AM Accounts Payable Check 72.00 105528 05/26/2006 KRONICK,MOSKOVITZ,TIEDEMANN,& Accounts Payable Check 36,057.30 105529 05/26/2006 LANDSCAPE STRUCTURES, INC. Accounts Payable Check 35.18 105530 05/26/2006 LEE WILSON ELECTRIC CO. INC Accounts Payable Check 3,600.00 105531 05/26/2006 , LEMOS FEED&PET SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 10.71 105532 05/26/2006 JAMES R. LEWIS Accounts Payable Check 250.00 105533 05/26/2006 LIGHTHOUSE Accounts Payable Check 290.65 105534 05/26/2006 LOCATE PLUS CORPORATION Accounts Payable Check 73.00 105535 05/26/2006 DAVID J. LODEN Accounts Payable Check 119.00 105536 05/26/2006 GEORGE W. LUNA Accounts Payable Check 75.00 105537 05/26/2006 BECKY MAXWELL Accounts Payable Check 67.24 105538 05/26/2006 STEVE MCHARRIS Accounts Payable Check 160.00 105539 05/26/2006 WADE MCKINNEY Accounts Payable Check 500.00 105540 05/26/2006 MEDWORKS, INC. Accounts Payable Check 130.00 105541 05/26/2006 MID-COAST MOWER&SAW Accounts Payable Check 52.33 105542 05/26/2006 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE Accounts Payable Check 455.510 29 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of May 2006 Check Check umber Date Vendor Description Amount 105543 05/26/2006 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 201.04 105544 05/26/2006 MICHAL S. MOSES Accounts Payable Check 992.60 105545 05/26/2006 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 92.34 105546 05/26/2006 NATIONAL STAFFING LLC Accounts Payable Check 252.80 105547 05/26/2006 VOID Accounts Payable Check 0.00 105548 05/26/2006 O'BANNON DIVERSIFIED Accounts Payable Check 350.00 105549 05/26/2006 THOMAS P.OWALLEY Accounts Payable Check 107.93 105550 05/26/2006 OFFICE DEPOT INC. Accounts Payable Check 1,226.06 105551 05/26/2006 OUTLET TOOL SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 91.51 105552 05/26/2006 BECKY J. PACAS Accounts Payable Check 75.00 105554 05/26/2006 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC Accounts Payable Check 28,069.05 105555 05/26/2006 PADRE ASSOCIATES, INC. Accounts Payable Check 640.00 105556 05/26/2006 PASO ROBLES SAFE&LOCK Accounts Payable Check 843.31 105557 05/26/2006 PAVEMENT ENGINEERING, INC. Accounts Payable Check 7,790.00 105558 05/26/2006 PC MECHANICAL, INC. Accounts Payable Check 10,848.32 105559 05/26/2006 PERRY'S PARCEL&COURIER SVC Accounts Payable Check 125.38 • 105560 05/26/2006 POOR RICHARD'S PRESS Accounts Payable Check 14.69 105561 05/26/2006 PRO MOTION SIGNS&SPORTS Accounts Payable Check 214.50 105562 05/26/2006 PROCARE JANITORIAL SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 176.91 105563 05/26/2006 PRW STEEL SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 193.65 105564 05/26/2006 GRACE L. PUCCI Accounts Payable Check 307.50 105565 05/26/2006 QUILL CORPORATION Accounts Payable Check 241.22 105566 05/26/2006 R.W. HERTEL&SONS, INC. Accounts Payable Check 325,000.00 105567 05/26/2006 RAINBOW TOWING Accounts Payable Check 88.00 105568 05/26/2006 RECOGNITION WORKS Accounts Payable Check 6.44 105569 05/26/2006 REDWOOD TOXICOLOGY LABORATORY Accounts Payable Check 12.00 105570 05/26/2006 RENEAU CHRYSLER DODGE Accounts Payable Check 35.25 105571 05/26/2006 RACHELLE RICKARD Accounts Payable Check 300.00 105572 05/26/2006 ROB DAVIS BACKHOE Accounts Payable Check 2,756.00 105573 05/26/2006 ALICE RODRIGUEZ Accounts Payable Check 50.00 105574, 05/26/2006 STEVE ROMO Accounts Payable Check 51.00 105575 05/26/2006 SAN LUIS OBISPO CO LABORATORY Accounts Payable Check 31.00 105576 05/26/2006 SANTA MARIA TIRE, INC. Accounts Payable Check 1,180.80 105577 05/26/2006 SBC/MCI Accounts Payable Check 70.33 105578 05/26/2006 VOID Accounts Payable Check 0.00 105579 05/26/2006 MICHELE SCHAMBER Accounts Payable Check 20.00 30 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of May 2006 Check Check Number Date Vendor Description Amount 105580 05/26/2006 SCOTT O'BRIEN FIRE&SAFETY CO Accounts Payable Check 96.20 105581 05/26/2006 SIGN OUTLET Accounts Payable Check 628.49 105582 05/26/2006 SILENT ALARM SECURITY Accounts Payable Check 315.00 105583 05/26/2006 SLO COUNTY CLERK RECORDER Accounts Payable Check 94.00 105584 05/26/2006 SMART AND FINAL Accounts Payable Check 132.70 105585 05/26/2006 DAVID L. SMAW Accounts Payable Check 34.00 105586 05/26/2006 SUPERIOR QUALITY COPIERS, INC. Accounts Payable Check 54.76 105587 05/26/2006 TARVIN &ASSOCIATES Accounts Payable Check 1,155.00 105588 05/26/2006 TEMPLETON FEED&GRAIN Accounts Payable Check 110.20 105589 05/26/2006 TEMPLETON UNIFORMS Accounts Payable Check 201.83 105590 05/26/2006 TESORO Accounts Payable Check 7,610.64 105591 05/26/2006 KRISTIN K.THAYER Accounts Payable Check 125.00 105592 05/26/2006 TOWN &COUNTRY FENCING Accounts Payable Check 450.00 105593 05/26/2006 TRIBUNE Accounts Payable Check 2,051.32 105594 05/26/2006 KIM TULL Accounts Payable Check 24.00 105595 05/26/2006 TURF STAR, INC. Accounts Payable Check 206.50 105596 05/26/2006 U.S. POSTMASTER Accounts Payable Check 500.000 105597 05/26/2006 UNITED STAFFING ASSOCIATES Accounts Payable Check 4,619.50 105598 05/26/2006 UNIVERSAL SPECIALTIES,INC. Accounts Payable Check 324.38 105599 05/26/2006 UPS Accounts Payable Check 80.66 105600 05/26/2006 VALLEY PACIFIC PETROLEUM SVCS Accounts Payable Check 4,105.26 105601 05/26/2006 VERIZON WIRELESS Accounts Payable Check 440.02 105602 05/26/2006 VFIS Accounts Payable Check 3,237.00 105603 05/26/2006 WALLACE GROUP Accounts Payable Check 5,600.00 105604 05/26/2006 WALLACE GROUP Accounts Payable Check 4,559.74 105605 05/26/2006 WEST-MARK Accounts Payable Check 88.95 105606 05/26/2006 WESTERN FARM SERVICE, INC. Accounts Payable Check 537.10 105607 05/26/2006 SUSAN M.WILLIAMS Accounts Payable Check 15.66 105608 05/26/2006 WILSON LAND SURVEYS, INC. Accounts Payable Check 544.85 105609 05/26/2006 WINE COUNTRY BALANCE Accounts Payable Check 295.00 105610 05/26/2006 WULFING'S BACKGROUND&POLYGR Accounts Payable Check 200.00 105611 05/31/2006 MARTIN TRACEY Accounts Payable Check 123.54 $ 9AAft NOW 31 ITEM NUMBER: A —4 DATE: 07/11/06 n 1911 19 9 Atascadero City Council May 2006 Staff Report City Treasurer May 2006 Investment Report RECOMMENDATION: Council approve the City Treasurer's report for May 2006 REPORT IN BRIEF: Cash and Investments Checking $ 1,134,366 Money Market Accounts 1,804 Certificates ofbeposit 8,210,154 Government Securities 9,275,830 LAIF 15,253,944 Cash with Fiscal Agents 150,196 Cash in Banks at May 31, 2006 $ 34,026,294 Deposits in Transit - Outstanding Checks (681,702) Cash and Investments at May 31, 2006 $ 33,344,592 Investment Activity Securities Purchased: Purchase Date Description Type Cost Maturity Date 05/02/06 Federal National Mtg Assn gov't security $ 300,000 04/28/11 05/10/06 Federal Home Loan Bank gov't security $ 288,150 12/17/10 05/12/06 Federal Home Loan Bank gov't security $ 100,000 12/23/09 Securities Matured: None Securities Sold/Called Prior to Maturity: Transaction / Original Cost/ Gain/(Loss) Tran Date Description/Type Maturity Sale Price on Call Transportation Alliance 05/12/06 Bank $ 99,000 $ 99,000 $ - 0 certificate of deposit 6/29/07 Other Reportable Activities: None Page 1 of 15 32 CITY OF ATASCADERO TREASURER'S REPORT CASH&INVESTMENTS ACTIVITY SUMMARY FOR THE MONTH OF MAY 2006 i CHECKING FISCAL ACCOUNT INVESTMENTS AGENT TOTALS Balance per Banks at May 1, 2006 $ 214,592 $ 32,577,515 $ 149,677 $ 32,941,784 Receipts 2,853,366 163 519 2,854,048 Disbursements (1,808,538) - - (1,808,538) Transfers In from Redevelopment LAIF 39,000 - - 39,000 Transfers In 2,369,096 2,533,150 . 4,902,246 Transfers Out (2,533,150) (2,369,096) - (4,902,246) Balance per Banks at May 31, 2006 $ 1,134,366 $ 32,741,732 $ 150,196 34,026,294 Deposits in Transit - Outstanding Checks (681,702) Adjusted Treasurer's Balance $ 33,344,592 33 Page 2 of 15 V' O O O N O C, oo O O O M O O r O O O O O M •—i CA CT O Ci C� t� O [� V1 Vl V1 O N a1 V C� O O Q ti b9 "� �tl cd cd cd \cd tC cV `O O N c0 eU ctl N a � 00 ri A V V' O O O N O O O O O O O O •� O O O O In O O O O O O O O D\ ao O O O M O O O O O O O O In V CN Q1 Ci C, fy V3 A \ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 h O 00 N M V V M M '� M '7 Wc W O O O O O O O O O O O [r O 1 O O Ul O ki) CD oo .�-i O O p O d' M V et M M M Mcd od cd M 7 7 b W • h N `�� �u �c �� �r Z 6 In � j � � •o •o •o •o •o •p o •G o 0 0 U r' Cl. a a a a o a o W A A A A A A A A A A W w w w w w 0 0 Wtz> W cd ca d a a v v v v U U U U U u � � u U U U u U c7 U W h M N N N O O O _O O Q r r r M O O O O O O O O O O O O 4, V � y t Qa y eve ry W a"i w � e � '��•+" .�°-1 oro � � w to ani w cc ami a • a aw as rah Oji Oa v� d U a wU Ua wU UU zEn xaa F d �. c [r cC \cd r V It N M Oo W oo O GL 34 0 0 0 0 0 C) 0 o to o O 0 0 0 ti o 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 o v o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o vi a vi oo a ON 0 ti �O Q� Q� O� O� N O�. Q, N ON Q� T O j It 69 '� cd cd cd c3 cd O e0 ro N O O O N m ti a 4 o O o 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 C 0 0 0 o O 0 s ON In o r- a o 00 a r r 0+ o rn o o a o afn en a o w ds C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �l 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 o vi �n �n o 0 cy r o 0 0 o v, o v In v, n o 00 00 rn M M M' M M M '7 M M Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O en M M M M V M M h W C7 A w o13ro m m V ti � o a. a o. a. •� a a a. �,' g' W W A A A A A A A A A A A w w w w w w w w w w w a 0 0 0 0 o o o o O o 0 cv ca w u v v v v w w w w C7 U U U U C7 U U C7 U U U U U N Fr V O If) N \ O O Q O O O O a H O y ° ad pp m ^� x cc Ca CQll a W C7 CQ C C In o C ti rn 00 ►7 O ►a N .'1i eQ Cn O L' ,Cgo W � � e° � x U � o o � [ m � Z 7� :V9M az 3a z . zrA co ° A 1. o Q A E o P6( U v� U O .-° Z U W W'm U W rA z U W U P. E- d F U U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ►7 N O O O N00 LnNC7, O In O v'f O O - O O O O O O O O O O O 35 O O O O O O N O O O O O O O O O O O O ON O O O O O O O o v� 00 o c r r r o 00 00 00 kn vi D\ M a\ O O' D\ N M Ca a a a 0Ina 0 aq O O o o O O o o O O c o O o 0 o O O CD C 0 o O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 In 00 O r c r c 00 00 00. O In CN rn a o 0 o rn M o o rn rn rn N m � y ss a o 0 0 0 0 0 Q o 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 c $ O O O r y O O M O O O N O On O O O O M M M M M M M �1' M M M M M M q 0 0 0 o o O O O O O O kn 0 W a � O O � 44 st: N o o a f+ ti U c7 U u u U c7 C7 M M M M a O. p o U h t7 a .a yS a O b d d o x cy C M M `• O c p �.�- �d - C• �l oo 00 �Oy ONO Oz ad co�7yto xt C F' cc 3 •O W y VW � V Sw4 40 "d c3 a� o a Uv U x � v wt/ aa. wt/ da wt/ tea t/ ALn wv wt/ ao 00 oo 00 00 00 00 tv o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o o O o N "It �o � O O 36 0 0 0 0 0 C> 0 o O o o, o 0 0 v 0 0 o a o 0 0 o v o 0 0 ri o a o; oo 00 00 o c o NO, p, O, - O, O, O, ON p, O aq O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 vi o o C, a o 00 00 C o r" Uo o N o 0 o a o, o a p o o a sv �l o rn o 0 00 0 0 0 0 o vl ,D O N rl M N v1 00 vl V1 r N M o o o o o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o �+ O vt N O O O oo h O O O vt O 00 N M O M N v1 M vl r N y \ N M M M M 7 M M fit' 0 A a � CS Iv m m ccm m tiwM � � ;t4 a �..� � •y N � ;t4 •VJ •V~i •VJ 44 • V] Vl [r , � o •C .0 � p .0 p p p � o� p� o� N U4. U N U N N W A A A A A A A A A A A _! U U U U U ww w w~ w^ w w w w^ w~ ~ U c7 U U U U U u u U W M M M M M ,p v) v) v1 M v) M M h """"hhhTVVVViii' O O O �O C O ,O �O O O OO O �O G N O v1 oo oo ,p .r. O N N. O M O O N N N N qoo oo oo oo oo a H O rA .� x C 3 m x rn U d a as a d w � � o ,MM. o � � � c d o � o �' d �" x ;� d b C � �' � 0A ° •� x c ai c a c7 ti c W is e = sa a Fq +U d o CQ Q ap o i z aaJ .SG C. N vy .D O rn U cs p, d cOO o Jea U a w U W U H d 3 V w U FT, .. � .� .. v� 9 Z U a cn 3 Gz+ ao 0o ao � ao 00 00 00 00 � � � o0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 hv o0 0 kf) o ,D Ne N N M -Q O O --� N N N •+ �O N � M o\o oo W oo oo oo O O O O O O O O O O 37 h o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 C o O o 0 0 W o rn a °n a rn rn C, o a ON C, O j ti V cq A O O O O O O O p O O O p O O kn C, kn 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O D\ O D1 D1 O\ D1 O O O 01 a T O 69 vi A o 0 0 0 0 k 0 0 0 0 0 0 w O O M C? M M M M M Ln O O h p In h h h tn O eO l0 M �, Kl f+l Kt M � V M Mm M M M en Oh W (Zcl t2 cd m h q c W V m lo Ln h n d tom. Z M j a Ln 44 ° a o o o 0 0 0 o o occ W a cl o L) o > o U U U U U U L) c� 0 0 7 A o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D a o. o. o U U i F C C q < d as a � O O � C W .ti � Pa ►� �-+ C 1>'Z+ O ra N v1 a .�-1 L U H q" 8 dC F7 O nt p is .rJ i'. O .L"+ O d d aC td le O wU u � o wx wc7 � U ww iwo, 3 � wU u Fa wU a o, a o, o, a rn a o 0 0 0 0 c o c fq N 'Ir O O N OO N N O O O O O O �i 38 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F. 00 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 vi o r r r 00 r r r- o r r o, O j N y as 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 v oo en o r r r 00 r r r o r r W a, o 0 o a1 o, rn a o+ o rn (21 W en �1 0 0, kr) tr) ,p v1 O 'M M W ti o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o w o 0 0 Q! O v1 O V1 �/'� v1 In v1 V1 Vl O O p OOi ry? N h O h N M N M M 7 d' M. A a � c A Q a [r O C O O C O Gp, C G O •C � fY W w w w cnw w w w w w 0 0 a o 0 0 � o 0 0 0 W � as w w w � ,w~ w w~ w w w w •w^ ,w^ v v v v v v v v v v -It a, 0 0 U O N O O O O N h 00 D\ O, b T O, O O O O O O O O O O O O O a C C cc Cees C C C-4 E" yo cc 00 A C N C1i CUi� eR [ V) 8 I M Q! " as y :: d A O x W A M a s� a° m a e d . ai o C7 c O = i ; v W .� 6° v c H y v y O 7" U o '6p y oo >; u � y u q H z V) o t U Wo d a, '� ►F. n at o t O y P � 3w wv PW In � z o � v� A x > vEn wF wt Ao. F3� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q d' vl v1 h O ,O r 00 O, C, O, O, O O O O O O O O 39 O O O O O O O O O O O O O M [r o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 r a o 0 o r o0 00 o0 o vi o WOW o a rn o 0 o rn a rn o, N o o O j as O C O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Cl O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 o a r" 00 00 00 c o o a o, o 0 C, a v o rn N a a o W a, sn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N v1 O O O O O h O h O kr1 O O V1 Ly oo vl O O vi O O O O N N N vi N M a' � V <i' � t7 �Y V 7 h d• V � A o 0 0 0 0 0 ti C 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 o vi o n o ri o o ri o0 vi O O �n O O O O N N v1 N A g O ctl c0 of eC N N cd ` w M j nu N y •N o o o � Ln ~ U U U c7 C7 U U U U U C7 U U C7 W '^ v o v v 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c c c o oo cc Q a W on Pa F e ^ od w coo ti ee c o cn o z � C .aw Z a � m a o d m c A i Z _w U w M Q m do > ccsx � a � a m 120 ►�. � yaCi d bon a v c a o 0 07 A x � ucD � o wU wU a3 Qw wx x wU xx 3U wU p� (71D\ Q, O O O O O O O Cl cy o 0 0 0 0 o r. [r O M O O oo O 00 M 40 N O O O O O O -It O O 7 O l— O Ir N O O O O O O - 7 O O O\ Vl M r O O O O lO O Okn ^' �O O lam. r- 00 00 00 d' 00 n V1 O. 00 O ti O� O O, O, Ol O, O1N (71 O. O. N N O j ti6y F en Ln � F �L. -a �G G 1L'ed kr) �L. O O �D O � t� U a Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 ° o o0 00 0o vi oo c� o 0 0 0 VO\ O D\ D\ O\ O\ O1 tn N O\ GL fH Q C. hIn In M O M 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 !r Vl O kn O V1 O O O v1 v1 O 01 Vl Vl N M N 7 M O r N 0 h w O p W ° a 0 0 0 0 0 0 `" � � Y y y cu co Q w w w w w w w w w U C7 U U U U U C7 U U U C7 C7 C7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 h00 a o cv C, x x U 00 C a ° 7 F x 0.1 aoe Q w a 0 0.A1 Z F FQ c C7 a a U x d a v rol A ro-1 o � o G za °� M a oq 0 g w p t x x M rr m e > CQ o 7 5 W a o a ' w w p as b L as �D C q a> Ca Q y 7 x d Z y En 94 y p, al Gzi U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0000 \�. O� 0000 wl O O O O O O O O O O O 41 00ON o o Ow O� ON N L' r m M 0 O y N N Y Ln r-n Cd 00 C. •V U O O O O OO ON O 0\ N U p O O O O O Lj Gni O T N O O O \\\\ M � A 00 W ti o 0 0 0 3 o0 N M O N O Call O y LQco W V Ct D "d • N h [�. Q d d d o > .'�. � a Q w en, Lz, �, a b o 44 rb ti b U ~ W A in A in rn71o ° �O �° .O .n �o � '� O •+SCS. N 00 0 0 0 0 o v O o l 4o w A G it 03 Q . d M x M z � � F•+ w :Y m0 9 ca cc y y w F v o j cw Uc� wc> zv cz ts 00 rq > ry d 42 City of Atascadero Investments by Type May 2006 Cash with Fiscal Agent Government Securities 1 28% Other 0% Certificates � '� i. �`� of Deposit 46% 25% Investment May 2006 LAIF $ 15,253,944 Certificates of Deposit 8,210,154 Government Securities 9,275,830 Cash with Fiscal Agent 150,196 Other 1,804 $ 32,891,928 43 Page 12 of 15 City of Atascadero Investments by Maturity . May 2006 One Month On Demand to One Year 47% 4% aL �L r + y r 1 �+ One to Five Years 49% Investment May 2006 On Demand $ 15,255,748 Within One Month - One Month to One Year 1,340,076 One to Five Years 15,845,908 $ 32,441,732 Page 13 of 15 44 City of Atascadero Investments by Custodial Agent May 2006 . Union Bank s u3 srtt XX�s E i S� Bank of New York 53% zfi5:% s yjX 4Y'rt i7i .y 1% b 6� s S£ State of California Other 46% 0% Custodial Agent May 2006 State of California $ 15,253,944 Other 50,352 Union Bank 17,437,436 Bank of New York 150,196 $ 32,891,928 45 Page 14 of 15 City of Atascadero Investment Yield vs. 2-Year Treasury Yield • For the Month Ended May 31,2006 4.50% 0 4.070-1.F- 4 .00% e, r a 3.50% 3.00% a 2.50% ar 2.00% a 1.50% 1.00% >r - 0.50% r x . a.: ' S.' Y� �• 0.00% Oh O� O� O� OHO Orb OrO OHO OHO �O �O ,TO ,LO ry0 ry0 �O �O ry0 ry0 ry0 \ry0 ry0 �a� �,ee� �oeee � Foe�a�G'° P eQ�e OG Ore �Ge �a e< � O City Yield 2-Yr Treasury Weighted Portfolio Yield 2-Yr Treasury Weighted Portfolio City Yield Yield May 2005 3.08% 3.20% June 2005 3.28% 3.09% July 2005 3.34% 3.22% August 2005 3.45% 3.28% September 2005 3.54% 3.21% October 2005 3.60% 3.33% November 2005 3.71% 3.41% December 2005 3.79% 3.49% January 2006 3.88% 3.52% February 2006 3.97% 3.68% March 2006 4.03% 3.71% April2006 4.13% 3.87% May 2006 4.28% 3.92% Page 15 of 15 46 ITEM NUMBER: A-5 ® m® WN DATE: 07/11/06 n iaia ® 1979 Atascadero City Council Staff Report— Police Department Noise Ordinance Amendments ZCH 2006-0116 (City of Atascadero) RECOMMENDATION: Council adopt on second reading, by title only, Draft Ordinance approving Zone Change 2006-0116 Part A amending the noise ordinance pertaining to cost recovery. DISCUSSION: This item was brought as a recommendation by the Planning Commission for consideration before Council on June 27, 2006. The changes to the ordinance pertain to extending the time period from 12 to 72 hours, which allow for recovery of costs related to repeated police responses to noise disturbances within the 72 hour time period. The matter was introduced by Council for first reading by title only on June 27, 2006, without alteration of the original recommendation. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1: Draft Ordinance 48 ITEM NUMBER: A-5 DATE: 07111/06 Attachment 1: Draft Ordinance DRAFT ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL APPROVE ZONE CHANGE 2006-0116 PART A, AMENDING MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS 9-14.03 AND 9-14.14 PER'T'AINING TO NOISE VIOLATION COST RECOVERY (City of Atascadero) The City Council hereby finds and declares as follows: WHEREAS, In 1983 the City Council of the City of Atascadero adopted certain noise regulations and exceptions and placed them in Title 9 Chapter 4 of the Atascadero Municipal Code; and, WHEREAS, In 1992 the City Council of the City of Atascadero adopted Article 9 Chapter 14 of the Atascadero Municipal Code entitled noise, which Chapter contained new regulations and new exemptions from the noise ordinance; and, WHEREAS, in 2004 the City Council repealed the less stringent noise standards established in 1983 to make it clear that the 1992 standards apply, and to make it clear that the noise standard exceptions from 1983 were not intended to be repealed and therefore they were renumbered into Chapter 14 to avoid confusion; and, WHEREAS,the City Council has determined that additional regulations are necessary in order to further reduce the harmful effects of noise on the community and its citizens; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the cost of addressing noise disturbances resulting from violations of State law and/or the Atascadero Municipal Code ought to be borne by those creating and/or allowing the illegal noise disturbances; and WHEREAS, the exemption of motorcycles and other similar two or more wheel vehicles operated in compliance with the motorcycle ordinance clarifies the allowed use in residential areas; and WHEREAS, the period of 12 hours limits the occasions for cost recovery measures to apply to repeat calls to noise complaints; and 49 ITEM NUMBER: A-5 DATE: 07/11/06 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to enact this amendment to protect the health, safety, and welfare of its citizens by applying orderly development of the City; and, WHEREAS, the laws and regulations relating to the State and local guidelines for implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) have been adhered to; and, WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed Public Hearing upon the subject Zone Change application was held by the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero at which hearing evidence, oral and documentary, was admitted on behalf of said zoning amendments; and, WHEREAS, the Atascadero City Council, at a duly noticed Public Hearing held on May 9, 2006, studied and considered Zone Change 2006-0116, after first studying and considering the Planning Commission's recommendation, and, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Findings for approval of zone text change. The Atascadero City Council herby finds as follows: 1. The zone change is consistent with General Plan policies and all other applicable ordinances and policies of the City. 2. Amendment of the zoning ordinance will provide for the orderly and efficient use of lands. 3. The zone change will not, in itself, result in significant environmental impacts. 4. The proposed action is considered Statutorily Exempt from CEQA under section15061(b)(3) since the action is a minor change to an existing ordinance that is more environmentally restrictive SECTION 2. Approval. The Atascadero City Council, in a regular session assembled on May 9, 2006 resolved to introduce for first reading by title only, an ordinance that would amend the City Zoning code text with the following: 9.14.14 Cost Recovery for Responses to Disturbances. (a) Definition. The definitions in this section apply to the following terms as used in this part: (1) "Disturbance" shall include conduct creating any disturbing or loud noise,including but not limited to violations of section 9-6.106 of the Atascadero Municipal Code. 50 ITEM NUMBER: A- 5 DATE: 07/11/06 2 "Response shall mean the arrival of a police officer at the scene of a disturbance ( ) P to render whatever service is reasonably required in order to stop a disturbance. (3) "Responsible party" is any person who owns, leases or is lawfully in charge of the property where the disturbance takes place, or any person who organizes, controls or participates in a disturbance. If the responsible person is a minor, then the parent or guardian who has physical custody of the child at the time of the disturbance shall be the responsible person who is liable. (b) Responses to disturbances. (1) No responsible party shall cause, permit or tolerate a disturbance. (2) Whenever a police officer at the scene warns any responsible party present to discontinue the disturbance, the responsible party shall be liable for the actual cost of each subsequent response required for a disturbance within 72 hours of the first response, (3) At the first response, the responding police officer shall give an oral and/or written warning to one or more of the responsible parties present that the disturbance must cease immediately, and that if a second or subsequent response to the disturbance is required within 72 hours following such notice, a response fee shall be charged to any responsible party for all responses after the first response. (4) All responsible parties shall be jointly and severally liable for the response charge regardless of whether or not a responsible party received an oral or written warning pursuant to Section 9-14.14 (b)(c). (c) Charging for responses. (1) The response charge shall be the actual cost of police services including, but not limited to, personnel and equipment, incurred for each subsequent response within the 72-hour period following the first response. (2) The bill or charges shall be served by the Chief of Police upon the responsible party within thirty days after the last response to a disturbance. (3) The total amount of the response charge shall be deemed to be a civil debt to the city and the director of finance may take such action to recover the costs as the city is authorized to do by law for the recovery of a civil debt. The bill of charges shall state the response fee. (4) The bill of charges and any other notices required by this part shall be served upon the responsible party in accordance with Chapter 12-1.06 of the Atascadero Municipal Code. If the responsible party has no last known business or residence 51 ITEM NUMBER: A-5 DATE: 07/11106 address, then the scene of the disturbance shall be deemed to be the proper address for service of notice. (5) The bill of charges shall include a notice of the right of the person being charged to request a hearing before the appeals hearing board within ten days of service of the bill to dispute the imposition of a response charge or the amount of the charge. SECTION 3. Savings Clause. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of the Section. The Council hereby declares that it would have adopted the Ordinance, and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions are declared invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION 4. Publication. A summary of this ordinance, approved by the City Attorney, together with the ayes and noes, shall be published twice: at least five days prior to its final passage in the Atascadero News, a newspaper published and circulated in the City of Atascadero, and; before the expiration of fifteen (15) days after its final passage in the Atascadero News, a newspaper published and circulated in the City of Atascadero. A copy of the full text of this ordinance shall be on file in the City Clerk's Office on and after the date following introduction and passage and shall be available to any interested member of the public. 52 ITEM NUMBER: A -5 DATE: 07/11/06 INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the Cit Council held on June 27, 2006, and PASSED g g Y and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Atascadero, State of California, on by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ATTEST: CITY OF ATASCADERO Marcia McClure Torgerson, C.M.C., Tom O'Malley, Mayor City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Patrick L. Enright, City Attorney 53 ITEM NUMBER: A-6 DATE: 07/11106 -Z elm iais� @ i 7s e Atascadero City Council Staff Report Administrative Services Department 2006-2007 Annual Spending Limit RECOMMENDATION: Council adopt the attached Draft Resolution establishing the annual spending limit for Fiscal Year 2006-2007, DISCUSSION: The City's annual spending limit (Gann Limit) must be approved by Council at the beginning of each fiscal year. Staff calculates the new limit based on the formula set forth in Proposition 111. The limit was calculated as follows: A. Prior Year Spending Limit $14,424,965 B. Population Factor 1.007300 C. Inflation Factor 1.058925 D. Adjustment Factor (B*C) 1.066655 E. Total Adjustment (A*(D-1)) $961,496 F. Current Year Limit (A+E) $15,386,461 FISCAL IMPACT: None. ALTERNATIVES: None. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Draft Resolution Adopting the Fiscal Year 2006-2007 Annual Spending Limit 54 DRAFT RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE FISCAL YEAR 2006-2007 ANNUAL SPENDING LIMIT WHEREAS, Proposition 111 revises the methodology used to calculate the Annual Spending Limit; and, WHEREAS, the City of Atascadero must select the most appropriate criteria to be used in calculating the annual limit. NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED,by the City Council of the City of Atascadero SECTION 1. That the City of Atascadero elects to use the following criteria for fiscal year 2006-2007 in establishing its new Annual Spending Limit: County Population and Increase in Non-Residential Assessed Valuation due to New Construction SECTION 2. That the annual spending limit for 2006-2007 is calculated as follows: Fiscal Year Percentage Change New Limit 2006-2007 6.6655% $15,386,461 SECTION 3. Any judicial action or challenge must be commenced within 45 days of the effective date of this resolution. SECTION 4. Documentation used in determining the Annual Spending Limit is available to the public in the Administrative Services Department; 6907 El Camino Real, Atascadero, California. 55 Draft Resolution Page Two i On motion by Council Member and seconded by Council Member ,the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ADOPTED: CITY OF ATASCADERO By: Tom O'Malley, Mayor Attest: Marcia McClure Torgerson, C.M.C., City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Patrick L.Enright, City Attorney 56 ITEM NUMBER: A-7 ' DATE: 07/11106 Big Nis 1918 i � 1978 CAD�� Atascadero City Council Staff Report- Public Works Department Temporary Road Closure San Fernando Road RECOMMENDATION: Council approve the temporary road closure request from Mitch Frederick Paving to close a portion of San Fernando Road on one day during the week of July 17, 2006, between the hours of 8:30 a.m. 4:00 p.m. DISCUSSION: Mr. Dan Philips, the property owner at 2135 San Fernando has been conditioned to overlay the portion of San Fernando Road fronting his property. It is not possible to allow through traffic while the paving is underway due to the narrow width of the road. The Contractor anticipates that the paving can be accomplished within,an 8 hour span between 8:30 a.m. and 4:OO p.m. during the week of July 17th. Due to the unpredictable schedule of the asphalt plant, he is unable to determine at this time which day that week the closure will be necessary. The contractor will be required to install informational signs a minimum of one week in advance giving notice of the closure. Appropriate signage will be installed indicating the road is not available to through traffic. Access will be available to all residents from either Monterey Road or Balboa Road, depending on the location of their property. FISCAL IMPACT: None 58 y meg. 5 t' h '2 t 14 if F, t I kN{ Pi 1 � � 1 e ITEM NUMBER: A-8 DATE: 07/11/06 p oae ® n Atascadero city Council Staff Report - Public Works Department Temporary Road Closure Sunken Gardens Special Events RECOMMENDATION: Council approve the road closures for the Sunken Gardens special downtown events; Movies in the Park, Master's Chorale and Winter Wonderland. DISCUSSION: The special events scheduled are: i Palma Avenue — East to West Mall o July 29, 2006 7:30 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. Movies in the Park o August 5, 2006 7:30 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. Movies in the Park o August 12, 2006 7:30 p.m, to 11:00 p.m. Movies in the Park o August 19, 2006 7:30 p.m. to 11:00 P.M. Movies in the Park o August 26, 2006 7:30 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. Movies in the Park o September 2, 2006 7:30 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. Movies in the Park East Mall— El Camino Real to Lewis o August 19, 2006 10:00 a.m. to 7:30 p.m. Master's Chorale West Mall- El Camino to Lewis East Mall— El Camino to Lewis -Palma — West Mall to East Mall o December 1, 2006 1:00 P.M. to 10:00 P.M. Winter Wonderland FISCAL IMPACT: $160.00 per event for the installation of Road Closed signs by Public Works Staff. 60 ITEM NUMBER: A-9 DATE: 07/11/06 1979 All Atascadero City Council Staff Report - Community Services Department Temporary Road Closure Hot EI Camino Cruise Nite RECOMMENDATION: Council approve the Draft Resolution authorizing the closure of EI Camino Real from Curbaril to Traffic Way on Friday, August 18, 2006, from 5:30 - 8:30 p.m. and the closure of East Mall, Palma and West Mall from 1:00 - 8:30 p.m. DISCUSSION: On Friday, August 18, 2006, City staff is proposing to close EI Camino Real from Curbaril to Traffic Way, including East Mall to Palma to Entrada from 6:30 p.m. until 8:30 p.m. to conduct the annual Hot EI Camino Nite Cruise and East Mall, Palma and West Mall from 1:00 p.m. to 8:30 pm to conduct the Hot EI Camino Nite Show `n Shine. For the seventh year, the Hot EI Camino Nite Cruise event will be coordinated by the Atascadero Community Services Department. This event attracts thousands of tourists and spectators who line up along -El Camino Real to view the cruise vehicles that participate in this growing event. Last year, there were 500 vehicles registered. The route for this year's "Cruise" is proposed to begin at Curbaril and end at Entrada. The route requires that Cal Trans or a Contractor close the northbound Highway 41 exit and the detouring of Highway 41. Cal Trans has requested a Resolution from the Atascadero City Council authorizing the closure of El Camino Real along the proposed "Cruise" route. In addition to the Hot EI Camino Cruise Nite, the Atascadero Main Street will be hosting a Show `n Shine around the Sunken Gardens Park from 3 — 6 p.m. During and after the Show `n Shine event other activities will be conducted in the Sunken Gardens park until approximately 10:00 p.m. 62 ITEM NUMBER: A-9 DATE: 07/11/06 FISCAL IMPACT: None. This is a non-profit event sponsored by the City of Atascadero, a governmental agency. Cal Trans will issue the permit free of charge if all traffic control and ramp closures are handled as per the permit provisions. The event will cover its direct costs and a large portion of its indirect costs. The event provides economic benefits to many Atascadero businesses. ALTERNATIVES: None proposed. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Draft Resolution authorizing the Closure of EI Camino Real 2. Map of the proposed Hot EI Camino Nite Cruise route 63 DRAFT RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA CREATING A TEMPORARY CRUISE ROUTE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Atascadero that the Hot El Camino Cruise Nite route is hereby established as El Camino Real from Curbaril Avenue to East Mall to Palma Avenue to Entrada Avenue to El Camino Real; San Luis Avenue from Curbaril Avenue to Pueblo Avenue; Pueblo Avenue from San Luis Avenue to El Camino Real; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that in order to provide a reserved route for the cruise the area described above is designated as a tow-away zone from the period of 5:30 p.m. until 8:30 p.m., August 18, 2006; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Atascadero that • the location for the Hot El Camino Cruise Nite "Show and Shine" event is hereby established as East Mall between El Camino Real and Palma Avenue, Palma Avenue between East Mall and West Mall, and West Mall between Palma Avenue and El Camino Real; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that in order to provide reserved parking for the "Show and Shine" event described above East Mall between El Camino Real and Palma Avenue, Palma Avenue between East Mall and West Mall, and West Mall between Palma Avenue and El Camino Real is additionally designated as a tow-away zone from 1 p.m. to 8:30 p.m., August 18, 2006. . 64 On motion by Council Member and seconded by Council Member , the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ADOPTED: ATTEST: CITY OF.ATASCADERO Marcia McClure Torgerson, C.M.C. Tom O'Malley, Mayor City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: • Patrick L. Enright, City Attorney 65 N tie ¢o City Hall w �es�� �GP� �.• SIN, of IQJ ♦.\ LEGEND \ ' © Cruise Pass Registration R Participant Entrance Hwy.41 NB 101 �� \ fp Exit Closed \ ............. Registration Line-up Santa Lucia y o 4-4-0 Cruise Route Bank TIVIeb1 —••—•►Detour Route \ Cruise Pass Registration \ j. CoXbati Participant Entrance 2006 Hot El Camino Cruise Nite Route Hot Cars Hometown Stars Friday,August 18,2006 For more information on the Hot El Camino Cruise Nite visit our website at www.HotElCaminoCruiseNite.com www.VisitAtaseadero.com www.Ataseadero.org 66 ITEM NUMBER: A- 10 DATE: 07/11/06 e: ■ ®! B ■ 1818 19 8 Atascadero City Council Staff Report- Community Services Department Temporary Road Closure Sunken Gardens Flea Market RECOMMENDATION: Council approve a request by the Community Services Department to close a portion Palma Avenue on Saturday, September 16, 2006 for the Sunken Gardens Flea Market. DISCUSSION: Background: On June 15, 2006, the Community Services Department submitted a Street Closure Request Form to close Palma Avenue from East Mall to West Mall on Saturday, September 16, 2006 from 5 a.m. until 4 p.m. for the Sunken Gardens Yard Sale. Analysis: City staff has reviewed the submitted Street Closure Request and recommends approval with the following conditions: 1. Proper traffic controls must be maintained throughout the duration of the event. The City of Atascadero will provide and set-up the required traffic control devices as indicated on the attached map. Fees for this service may apply in the future. 2. Emergency vehicle access is required at all times. Community Services Staff is responsible to ensure that individuals are assigned to remove the barricades to provide emergency vehicle access. 3. Community Services Staff is responsible for removing trash generated in the area of the road closure. 4. Community Services Staff is responsible to remove all traffic controls immediately following the event. Conclusion: Staff recommends that the City Council approve ` a request by the Community Services Department to close a portion Palma Avenue from East Mall to West Mall on Saturday, September 16, 2006 for the Sunken Gardens Flea Market. 68 FISCAL IMPACT: None. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Approve the Street Closure Request as recommended 2. Deny the Street Closure Request ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 Street Closure Map 69 [Sunken Gardens Yard Sale Sept. 16,2006 EI Camino Real N N ' O O V V E E N N D D O O R R CC P p Conces- G yA A Bions N Ch R R .� K ?r I Rest Room R a1 N sign N G G S S I I G G N NO VENDOR PARKING SIGNS N S S Palma Ave. Rest Dumpsters Roo City Parking Lot City Hall 22 Barricades Lewis Ave. 2 Road Closed to Trough Traffic 4 Extra Trash Cans Vendor Unloading Signs Sign Stakes 70 ITEM NUMBER: B-1 DATE: 07/11/06 1979CAD // Atascadero City Council Staff Report - Public Works Department Informational Item: 3-F Meadows (Oak Ridge Estates) Off Site Requirements RECOMMENDATION: Informational item only, no staff recommendation at this time. DISCUSSION: The Atascadero Municipal Code (PD-11) and the 3-F Meadows Environmental Impact Report Mitigation Monitoring Plan requires the developer of 3-F Meadows to complete the following: 1. Los Altos, Morro Road to San Marcos Road. (a) Repair all cracks and holes and repair deteriorating or inadequate paving edges and shoulders. (b) The asphalt surface of the road shall be widened on curves less than 200 feet radius per Section 4, Paragraph F of the City Standard Specifications, oras approved by the City Engineer. 2. San Marcos Road Proiect boundary to Los Altos Road. 72 (a) Repair/Reconstruct San Marcos Road to level acceptable to the City Engineer. (b) The asphalt surface of the road shall be widened on curves Fess than 200 feet radius per Section 4, Paragraph IF of the City Standard Specifications, or as approved by the City Engineer. (c) Continue to patch and repair the road surface when construction damage occurs. 3. City Staff will bring an item for City Council to accept San Marcos Road for maintenance after the existing construction damage is repaired. Background: • The 3-F Meadows Project is a 113 lot residential development on the Westside of Atascadero. • The project-impacts were addressed in a December 1994 Environmental 'Impact Report -(EIR) (See Attachment "A") and the conditions of development were established in the City Municipal Code (Municipal Code) section 9-3.656 "Establishment of Planned Development Overlay Zone No. 11 (PD-11) (See Attachment"B"). This project uses San Marcos and Los Altos Roads as primary access routes for construction vehicles. City Council directed staff to prepare a report regarding the improvements required, per the conditions, to San Marcos and Los Altos Roads by the 3-F Meadows EIR and PD-11. Analysis: California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Requirements • The California Environmental Quality Act requires that mitigation measures from any Environmental Impact Report (EIR) be fully enforceable through permit conditions, agreements, or other legally binding instruments. • The City Council adopted an EIR with a mitigation monitoring program for 3-F Meadows. • The City Council adopted PD-11 to rezone the property, which specifically included the provision that a mitigation monitoring program be prepared in conformance with the mitigation monitoring plan contained in the EIR. • Since the mitigation measures are incorporated in the PD-11 plan adopted by the Council, the EIR mitigation measures are fully enforceable, whether or not they are specifically mentioned in PD 11. • The 3-F Meadows EIR Mitigation Measures detail off site road requirements and is contained in Section D, Traffic Safety (pages IV-D1 through IV-D6). • The Mitigation Measures are summarized in the EIR Table S on page 11-6. • The complete text of Section D and Table S are included as Attachment "A." 73 ' • The applicable Municipal Code language requires offsite road improvements in Section 9-3.656 (c), Engineering, and is included as Attachment "B." The Mitigation Measures from the EIR and PD-11 are outlined below. Where mitigation measures conflict, City staff will enforce the more stringent measure. Los Altos, Morro Road to San Marcos Road The requirements for road improvements are discussed in section D "Traffic Safety" of the EIR. Specific mitigation measures are listed on pages IV-D3 and IV-D5 as follows: • Identify below minimum radius curves and widen the pavement at the inside edge (less than 100 foot centerline radius add 4 feet, 101 to 150 foot radius add 3 feet, 151 to 200 foot radius add 2 feet) • Repair all cracks and holes and repair deteriorating or inadequate paving edges and shoulders. The mitigation measures for Los Altos Road are summarized on page II-6 of the EIR as follows: • Identify areas of insufficient shoulder width and widen as necessary. • Provide curve widening as required by City standard. • Repair all pavement cracks and holes and deteriorated shoulders. The conditions of development for Los Altos Road are listed in the Atascadero Municipal Code PD-11 page 382 as follows: Curve widening shall be constructed on Los Altos Road from Highway 41 to San Marcos Road where curve radii are less than two hundred (200) feet. Curve widening shall be constructed in conformance with Section 4, Paragraph F of the City Standard Specifications, or as approved by the City Engineer. Plans for the curve widening shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer prior to the approval of the Master Development Plan. The curve widening on Los Altos Road shall be constructed when the ADT on Los Altos Road reaches five hundred (500) vehicles per day, with the development of the twenty-seventh lot in Phase 1, or within three (3) years of the issuance of building permits for Phase 1, whichever is earlier. In summary City Staff will be requiring the following for Los Altos Road: 1. Curve widening per PD-11. (Plans submitted to the City for this work) 2. Repair all cracks and holes and repair deteriorating or inadequate paving edges and shoulders. 74 San Marcos Road Proiect boundary to Los Altos Road The requirements for road improvements are discussed in section D "Traffic Safety" of the EIR. Specific mitigation measures are listed on pages 1V-D3 and IV-D5 as follows: San Marcos Road shall be upgraded to "previously constructed standards" and accepted by the City for maintenance prior to the construction of the project roads. The mitigation measures for San Marcos Road are summarized on page II-6 of the EIR as follows: • Repair/reconstruct San Marcos Road to level acceptable to City Engineer prior to construction of any on-site roads. (City to accept as City-maintained street.) The conditions of development for San Marcos Road are listed in the Atascadero Municipal Code PD-11 page 382 as follows: • San Marcos Road between Los Altos Road and the project boundary shall be improved preparatory to acceptance of this portion of road into the City maintained system. • Curve widening shall be constructed where cure radii is less than two hundred (200) feet. Curve widening shall be constructed in conformance with Section 4, Paragraph F of the City Standard Specifications, or as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for the cure widening shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer prior to approval of the Master Development Plan. San Marcos Road between Los Altos Road and the project boundary shall be improved prior to the development of Phase 1 of the project and prior to the issuance of building permits. • The applicant shall enter into a maintenance agreement with the City for the portion of San Marcos Road between Los Altos Road and the project boundary. The agreement shall guarantee that damage to the road which results from construction traffic generated by the development of the project is properly repaired. The agreement shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and the City Attorney. The agreement shall remain in-force throughout construction of Phase 1 and Phase 2 of the project. In summary City Staff will be requiring the following for San Marcos Road: 1. Repair/reconstruct San Marcos Road to level acceptable to City Engineer. This work was completed in 2001/2002 per San Marco Road Additional Improvements Agreement Dated August 23, 2003 (See Attachment "C"). 2. Curve widening per PD-11. This work was completed in 2001/2002 per San Marco Road Additional Improvements Agreement Dated August 23, 2003. 75 3. Road Maintenance. Maintenance agreement and bond in place. The developer will continue to patch and repair the road surface when damage occurs. The developer has applied for an encroachment permit to perform the latest maintenance work (See Attachment "D"). 4. City Staff will bring an item for City Council to accept San Marcos Road for maintenance after the existing construction damage is repaired. FISCAL IMPACT: There will be additional cost to the City if the City Council accepts San Marcos Road for maintenance. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment "A" Excepts from: The Final 3-F Meadows Environmental Impact Report dated December 2004 Attachment "B" Excerpts from Atascadero Municipal Code PD-11 Attachment "C San Marcos Road Additional Improvement Agreement Dated August 23, 2001 Attachment "D" Proposed road maintenance improvements by developer 76 ITEM NUMBER: B -2 DATE: 07/11/06 wa®6 1 Si ;Q S 197a ,AfAsrAn�/% Atascadero City Council Staff Report- City Manager's Office Human Services Grants RECOMMENDATION: Council approve Human Services Grants to the Agencies and in the amounts recommended by the Finance Committee in Attachment A. DISCUSSION: Background: The City of Atascadero has a Human Services Grant program, where annually $20,000 has been available to assist local service providers that have a profound impact on the community. The providers must meet a series of eligibility criteria in the competitive process. The Finance Committee has reviewed the applications and has made the attached recommendations. Twenty-five applications were received requesting $77,053.00. All of ,the applications complied with the City's criteria and all were worthy of funding. Twelve applications are recommended for full or partial funding as can be seen on Attachment A. The complete applications are available for review in the City Clerk's office. FISCAL IMPACT: The program is budgeted at $20,000. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Attachment A - Recommendations 92 ITEM NUMBER: B -2 DATE: 07/11/06 iai$ i �s e CITY OFATASCADERO Human Services Grants -2006 Finance Committee's Recommendations Agency Name Prior Year Request Recommendation A.S.H. Building Blocks New $ 2,000 $ 2,000.00 AIDS Support Network $ 445 $ 1,050 $ - American Red Cross $ 1,400 $ 2,500 $ 1,500.00 Atascadero Community Link $ 1,000 $ 1,750 $ 1,000.00 Atascadero Loaves & Fishes $ 5,000 $ 7,500 $ 4,500.00 Atascadero Main Street Historical New $ 5,000 $ 2,500.00 Atascadero Main Street New $ 5,000 $ - Atascadero Main Street- seminar New $ 2,500 $ 2,500.00 Atascadero Main Street- Kiosk New $ 5,000 $ - Community Counseling Ctr. New $ 1,500 $ - ECHO New $ 5,000 $ - EOC $ - $ 2,000 $ - Food Bank Coalition $ - $ 2,000 $ - Homeless Housing Project $ - $ 8,400 $ - Hospice $ 1,600 $ 2,000 $ 500.00 Hotline New $ 2,000 $ 500.00 North County Connection $ 1,600 $ 4,200 $ - North County Humane Society New $ 3,450 $ - North County Women's Shelter $ 3,000 $ 3,000 $ 3,000.00 Options New $ 5,000 $ - Parks for Pups $ - $ 400 $ - Senior Legal Services $ 750 $ 1,003 $ 500.00 SLO Mozart Festival New $ 2,500 $ - Sr. Nutrition Program $ 1,000 $ 1,100 $ 1,000.00 Transitions Mental Health Assoc. (TMHA) $ 1,000 $ 1,200, $ 500.00 TOTAL 1 $ 16,795 $ 77,053 $ 20,000.00 93 ITEM NUMBER: B-3 DATE: 07/11/06 M1 MIN 0 0 �9�s ■ 197e Atascadero City Council Staff Report - City Attorney's Office Cardroom Ordinance Consideration of Amendment to Increase the Maximum Number of Tables in a Cardroom RECOMMENDATION: Council direct staff to submit the proposed Ordinance to the Division for Gambling Control for review and comment. DISCUSSION: The City adopted.a Cardroom Ordinance in 1992, and amended the ordinance in 1999. (Section 3-5.105 of the Municipal Code) The ordinance authorizes a maximum of five '(5) card tables to be licensed and operated within the City. The ordinance further limits the number at any establishment to two (2) card tables. Presently, the City has one cardroom operator who operates two card tables. The owner of the Cardroom has requested that he be able to increase the number of tables in his establishment to five tables, as a result of the passage of recent legislation. The City Council heard the request on May 9, 2006, and directed staff to prepare revisions to the ordinance that would authorize four (4) tables at any cardroom. In 2005, the legislature amended the Gambling Control Act to authorize a city or county to amend its ordinance, without voter approval, to increase the number of tables allowed in any gambling establishment up to 24.99 or two tables, whichever is greater, when compared to the number operated on January 1, 1996. (Business & Professions Code section 19961 .05). In this instance, the City may amend the Municipal Code to authorize up to four (4) card tables in a single establishment, without putting the matter on the ballot. Prior to adopting any amendment to the Code relating to gambling establishments, the City must submit the proposed ordinance to the Division of Gambling Control for review and comment. If the Council is in agreement with the draft ordinance, the City will forward the draft ordinance to the Division of GamblingControl. Once the Cit has received comments from the Division, staff will Y bring the ordinance, with any comments or revisions, to the Council for consideration of adoption. 94 ITEM NUMBER: B-3 DATE: 07/11/06 Proposed Amendments to Cardroom Ordinance: The proposed ordinance amends provisions in the City's Cardroom Ordinance that regulates cardroom within the City. The major provisions of the proposed ordinance are as follows: • increases the maximum number of tables in any cardroom establishment from two (2) to four (4) • Employees must obtain a work permit • Establish requirement for application for license and revocation of license • Require a bond with each application • Require payment of annual fee to be set by Resolution of the Council There are also fees for work permits and license. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Draft Ordinance 2. Municipal Code section 3-5.105 95 DRAFT ORDINANCE • AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, AMENDING TITLE 3 OF THE ATASCADERO MUNICIPAL CODE,AMENDING THE CARDROOM ORDINANCE ADOPTED BY THE CITY OF ATASCADERO CONCERNING FEES AND EXPANSION OF TABLES WHEREAS, for all of the reasons set forth herein, the City Council of the City of Atascadero ("City") desires to amend its requirements regarding the number of gambling tables in the City and WHEREAS,for all of the reasons set forth herein the City Council of the City of Atascadero ("City") desires to amend its annual license fee for gambling establishments in the City. NOW THEREFORE,the City Council of the City of Atascadero DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findings. The City Council finds as follows. 1. The legislature,in enacting the Gambling Control Act, indicated its intent to have concurrent jurisdiction with local governments over gambling establishments in the state and to provide uniform, minimum standards of regulations of permissible gambling activities and the operation of lawful gambling establishments. As long as it is not inconsistent with the Act, any City or county has the authority to prohibit any gambling activity and impose more stringent local controls or conditions upon gambling than are imposed by the Act or by the Commission. The City may also inspect gambling premises to enforce applicable state and local laws, impose a local tax or license fee, and enact, amend, or enforce any local ordinance relating to licensing of gambling establishments. 2. Under the Gambling Control Act,no new gambling establishment may be opened in a city or county in which a gambling establishment was not operating on or before January 1, 1984, except upon the affirmative vote of the electors of that city or county. The City's Ordinance Code provides that no more than a total of five card tables shall be licensed to operate within the City and no permittee shall be authorized to operate more than a total of two card tables. 3. In 2005 the Legislature amended the Gambling Control Act to authorize a city or county to amend its ordinance, without voter approval,to increase the number of tables allowed in an gambling establishment up to 24.99%, or two tables, whichever is greater, when compared to the number operated on January 1, 1996. 4. Any amendment to the city's cardroom ordinance must be submitted to the Division of Gambling Control for review and comment before the ordinance is adopted. 5. The City amends its ordinance to increase the number of card tables at any establishment to four. In addition, in any amendment to the cardroom ordinance, the City will review 96 the other provisions in the ordinance, including hours of operation, work permits, licenses, games played, and any fees or taxes imposed. Section 2: Section 3-5-105 of the Atascadero Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 3-5.105 Cardrooms. 1. License Required. It shall be unlawful for any person for him/herself, or for any other person, to engage in or carry on, maintain or conduct, or cause to be engaged in, carried on,maintained, or conducted, any cardroom in the City without first having secured a license from the City to do so according to each and every requirement of this section or without complying with each and every regulation set forth in this section pertaining to such cardroom. Each licensee and operator of a cardroom, shall employ only those persons who have obtained a work permit as defined and set forth herein. 2. Definitions a. Act. Act shall mean the Gambling Control Act as codified in Division 8, Chapter 5 of the California Business &Professions Code (commencing with Section 19800). b. Applicant. "Applicant" means every person who applies fora license to operate a cardroom and every individual who requests a permit as provided for by this chapter. C. Billiard Parlor. For the purpose of this chapter, a"billiard parlor" or"pool room" includes a fixed place of business of any kind where billiards, pool, snooker or eight-ball or other similar games tables are maintained on the premises, whether or not coin operated. d. Card Games. "Card games" as used in this chapter means all forms of card games authorized by the state of California. e. Cardroom. "Cardroom" as used in this chapter means any building or structure,or any portion of a building or structure, or any premises or place where any person or persons are allowed to play a card game as defined in this section. f. Card Table. "Card table" as used in this chapter means a card table within a business premises where there is carried on any card game for compensation, which game is not unlawful under the provisions of California Penal Code Section 330, or any other provision of law. g. Chief of Police."Chief of Police" means the Chief of Police and his/her designee. Direct of Administrative Services. "Direct of Administrative Services" shall be the Director and his/her designee. h. Employee. "Employee" means every individual, employed either as an agent, employee, or otherwise,of the licensee, as defined in this section,or under the 97 direction and control of the licensee of any cardroom, with or without compensation. Anyone who is required to routinely enter into the card playing • area during the course of his or her duties is considered an employee. The term "employee" does not include a bartender, culinary worker or other person not directly connected with the cardroom operation. i. License. "License" as used in this chapter means a grant from the City Council authorizing a person as defined in this section to operate a cardroom within the City of Atascadero. j. Licensee. "Licensee" means the person, as defined in this chapter, to whom a cardroom license has been issued pursuant to this chapter. k. Person. "Person" means and includes any individual, partnership, corporation or combination, business entity or combination thereof. 1. Work Permit. "Work permit" means a grant of permission from the Director of Administrative Services to an,individual allowed by this chapter to work as an employee in a cardroom within the City of Atascadero, 3. License-Application-Bond. To apply for a cardroom license, a person shall take the following steps: a. Every applicant for a license shall first obtain a state gambling license as required by the Gambling Control Act and the implementing regulations (California Code of Regulations,Title 11,Division 3, Chapter 1, Article 1, Section 2000 et seq.). Every applicant shall fully comply with the Act and the implementing regulations including,but not limited to, Section 2050 of Title 11 of the California Code of Regulations that requires an owner or a key employee, as defined by the Act, to be on the premises, at all times that the establishment is open to the public unless the Division of Gambling Control authorizes availability by telephone. Key employees must obtain a key employee license as required by the Act; b. File with the City Clerk a written application, signed by the applicant, setting forth the nature of the business that he or she wishes to engage in and the place where he or she proposes to establish such business, including the particular building, and room or rooms; C. The true and correct name and address of each applicant of the building or structure within which the cardroom is proposed to be maintained shall be included with the license application. Written consent from the owner of the building or structure is required on the application; d. Submit a bond by an authorized surety company to be approved by the City Council in the penal sum of five hundred dollars payable to the City. The following condition shall be added to a cardroom license regarding the bond, when approved by the City; (1) Neither the applicant nor anyone in his/her employ in such business will violate any ordinance of this City or any law of this state, or of the United 98 States of America, or any political subdivision or agency thereof, during the time for which such license is granted.That upon a violation of the • condition of such bond, the same shall be and become due and payable to .such City and the penalty thereof may be recovered in a civil action. The conviction of, or plea of guilty by, the person to whom such license is issued, or anyone in his employ in such business for the violation of any such ordinance or law, shall ipso facto work a forfeiture of such bond, and any such conviction or plea of guilty shall be conclusive evidence of such forfeiture, and in the event of such conviction or plea of guilty the license shall be canceled; e. That the applicant verify with the Director of Community Development, that the subject property zoning permits the proposed cardroom use; f. A statement that the applicant understands and agrees that the application shall be considered by the City Council after a full investigation and reports, including any available criminal and arrest and conviction offender information, have been made by the Chief of Police, other City officials or their authorized representatives. A statement that the applicant authorizes the City or its authorized agents to update the investigation and background information on an annual basis if the application is approved. 4. Standards for Issuance. The City Council shall consider and determine whether to issue an license to operate a cardroom subject tot he following conditions: a. No more than a total of five (5) cardrooms shall be licensed to operate within the City under provisions of this chapter. b. No one permittee shall be authorized to operate more than a total of four (4) cardrooms within City. C. No more than four(4) card tables shall be operated and maintained within any single business premises within the City. d. No card table license shall be issued unless the location for the cardroom(s) is in compliance with all applicable zoning and building regulations of the City. The Community Development shall review all applications to verify compliance with the Zoning Code. The Council shall consider the affect of the operation of a cardroom on other sensitive uses located in the vicinity of the cardroom, including but not limited to schools, public parks or recreational areas, public buildings with programs for minors,and religious institutions. e. No cardroom license shall be transferable to another location or permittee without the approval of the City Council. Playing of all games shall be confined to those designated areas of the cardroom premises as may be set froth in the cardroom license. No playing of any games shall be permitted at any other location within or upon the cardroom premises. 99 f. No cardroom license shall be issued to any person who has been convicted of any felony,nor to any association, partnership or corporation of which any owner thereof has been convicted of a felony. g. In addition to any other restrictions provided by law, no card table license shall be issued to anyone who is disqualified from holding a State gambling license for any of the reasons specified in California Business and Profession Code section 9850. h. Applicant shall provide to the City copies of all written reports filed with the Division of Gambling Control pursuant to the Act or Title 11 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Cardroom Work Permit--Application and Denial. a. Cardroom employees must obtain a cardroom work permit from the Director of Administrative Services or his/her designee of the City of Atascadero. For the purposes of this chapter, "cardroom employees are defined to include dealers, overseers and others directly connected with the operation and supervision of card tables, and excludes waitresses, waiters,bartenders, culinary workers and others not connected with such operation and supervision. Applications for cardroom work permits shall be submitted under oath and contain the past criminal record, if any, of the applicant, and such information as may be deemed necessary by the chief to determine whether the applicant is a proper person to be issued a cardroom work permit. The application also shall be accompanied by fingerprints, a recent photograph of the applicant and an amount equal to any fingerprint processing fee required by the City. b. A cardroom work permit shall not be issued to any person who would be disqualified from holding a state gambling license for the reasons specified in paragraphs (1)through (7), inclusive of subdivision (a) of Section 19850A of the Act; or regarding whom the Division of Gambling Control of the state of California has filed an objection to the City. C. The Director of Administrative Services or his/her designee may deny issuance of cardroom work permit for any further cause deemed reasonable by the Director. The action of the Director denying a cardroom work permit on the basis of this section shall be subject to appeal to the City Council. Notice of such appeal shall be filed with the City Clerk within ten days after the notice of denial of the permit. Upon failure to file notice of appeal within the ten-day period,the action of the Director denying the permit shall be final and conclusive. d. Cardroom work permits shall be prominently displayed in the cardrooms by any cardroom employees when they are working. e. Each application for a cardroom work permit shall be accompanied by a fee as established by City Council resolution. The fee shall not be returned in the event that the permit is refused, revoked, or suspended, as provided in this chapter. The permit shall be valid for one year from the date of issue;however,it may be 100 prorated quarterly. The date of expiration shall be prominently displayed on the face of the permit. restricted as to lace of • f. The holder of a cardroom work permit shall not bee p employment. g. A statement that the applicant understands and agrees that the application shall be considered by the Director of Administrative Services after a full investigation and reports, including any available criminal and arrest and conviction offender information, have been made by the Director of Administrative Services other City officials or their authorized representatives. A statement that the applicant authorizes the City or its authorized agents to update the investigation and backgroundinformation on an annual basis if the application is approved. 6. Permit revocation or Suspension. The Director may revoke or suspend, and take possession of any cardroom work permit issued under this chapter, upon any violation of the provisions of this chapter. The action of the Director shall be subject to appeal to the council. Notice of such appeal shall be filed with the City Clerk within ten days after notice of the revocation or suspension action. Upon failure to file notice of appeal within the ten-day period, the revocation or suspension of the cardroom work permit shall be final and conclusive. 7. Revocation of Licenses. The City Council shall have the right to revoke any cardroom license when the possessor thereof has violated, or permitted the violation of, any of the terms of this chapter. The City Council may also revoke any cardroom license when the business being operated is not being conducted in accordance with the public health, safety or welfare or when, in the discretion of the City Council, it is found that the continued operation of such business will create or is creating a policy problem to the City. Prior to revoking any cardroom license, the City Council shall cause to be served on the applicant a notice of its intention to do so at least five days prior to the date upon which it intends to consider the matter of such revocation, and also stating the right of the licensee to appear before the City Council and to show cause why such license should not be revoked. The decision of the City Council with respect to such revocation shall be final. 8. Attendance by Minors. No person under the age of twenty-one shall be employed in or allowed to frequent, remain in or visit any room or, premises wherein is conducted or operated any card table licensed under the provisions of this chapter. 9. Patron Security and Safety in and Around a Cardroom Establishment. a. Each applicant fora cardroom license, at the time of application, and annually thereafter, at the time of cardroom license renewal, shall present a plan for security and safety of patrons of the cardroom in and around the cardroom establishment. The plan shall set forth such provisions as are necessary to ensure the safety and security of patrons,including measures taken or instituted to avoid follow-home robberies. The holder of a cardroom license shall be liable for the safety and security of patrons to the fullest extent under the law. Any effort on the part of a cardroom licensee to limit such liability shall be clearly posted in 101 such a manner as to give adequate notice to patrons. The plan shall include a detailed summary of all known incidents involving or affecting patron security and safety in and around the cardroom establishment for the proceeding year. b. The Chief or his/her designee may require, in his or her discretion, all cardroom licensees to implement reasonable security measures to insure the safety of patrons including, but not limited to,hiring private uniformed security guards. If security guards are required, the chief shall determine the number and hours of coverage. C. During all hours of operation, doors at the cardroom establishment shall be unlocked and accessible to the general public and open to police inspection. Cardrooms shall be located and so arranged that card tables and the players at the tables are plainly visible from the door opening of the cardroom when the door is opened. No wall, partition, screen, or similar structure between the front door opening and any card table located in the cardroom shall be permitted if it interferes with such visibility. 10. Transfer and Assignment. Any transfer or assignment of any license shall be considered for all purposes in the same manner as a new application for a cardroom license in the City, and all the provisions of this chapter applicant to new and original applications shall apply. 11. Annual Fee. Licenses shall be issued on an annual basis. The annual license fee, payable each fiscal year beginning July 1, 2006, shall be established by resolution of the City Council. The fees shall be payable to the City after the Council has approved the issuance of the license but prior to the issuance of the license. The operator of a cardroom shall pay the license fee set forth in this section regardless of the license fees he/she might pay for other businesses. If the same person operates two (2) or more cardrooms, he/she shall pay on each cardroom the license fee set forth in this section and shall have a separate license for each cardroom. 12. Police Access to Premises. The City Council finds that it is necessary and in the public interest that law enforcement officers have access to any premises in which a card table is being operated under the terms of this chapter. Any premises for which a license has been issued under the provision of this chapter shall be deemed to constitute a public place, and all police officers and peace officers shall at all times have access thereto during business hours. 13. Hours of Operation. Unless the hours of operation for a cardroom are restricted in the cardroom permit, a cardroom may operate twenty-four(24)hours per day. Each permittee shall clearly post the hours of operation of the cardroom so as to provide law enforcement and cardroom patrons adequate notice of the hours of operation. If alcohol is served on the premises (with the proper licenses from the Department of Alcohol Beverage Control), all alcoholic beverages shall cease being served between the hours of 2:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m. each day.' 102 14. Bets or Wagers. No card table permittee, owner or employee shall allow any person playing in any game to make any single bet or wager in excess of five hundred dollars ($500.00). a. The wagering limit shall be five hundred dollars in the same hand. No cardroom owner, operator, or employee shall permit any of the following: (1) A person making aggregate bets in excess of five hundred dollars in the same hand; (2) Simultaneous hands or betting squares by the same player; (3) Bets made by any owner, operator,or employee while on duty; (4) Bets made by a shill or dummy player. b. Wagering at any table shall be limited to table stakes. No side bets shall be permitted. Table limits shall be posted in a location observable from the table. The cardroom shall set individual table stake limits, not to exceed the wagering limit. Table limits may be changed with not less than thirty minutes notice to the patrons. C. The wagering limit may be changed by council resolution. 15. Penalties for Violations. Any violation of this chapter shall constitute a misdemeanor, and any person found guilty thereof shall, upon conviction or plea of guilty, be punished by a fine pursuant to Chapter 3 of Title 1 of the Municipal Code or by imprisonment in the jail of the City, or in the jail of the county of San Luis Obispo,for not more than three months, or by both such fine and imprisonment, and when a fine is imposed the judgment may direct that the defendant be imprisoned in thecountyjail till such fine is satisfied at the rate established by the county. 16. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this section is for any reason deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this section. The City Council of the City of Atascadero hereby declares that it would have adopted this section and each subsection, sentence,clause, phrase or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact any one or more subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases or other portions might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional. Section 3. Regulations Nonexclusive. The provisions of this ordinance regulating cardrooms are not intended to be exclusive and compliance therewith shall not excuse noncompliance with any other regulations pertaining to the operation of businesses as adopted by the Atascadero City Council. 103 Section 4. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, or phrase in this ordinance or any part thereof is for any reason held to be unconstitutional or invalid, or ineffective by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity or effectiveness of the remaining portions of this ordinance or any part thereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed each section irrespective of the fact that any one or more subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, or phrases be declared unconstitutional, invalid, or ineffective. Section 5. No Mandatory Duty of Care. This ordinance is not intended to and shall not be construed or given effect in a manner that imposes upon the City or any officer or employee thereof a mandatory duty of care towards persons and property within or outside of the City so as to provide a basis of civil liability for damages, except as otherwise imposed by law. Section 6. Effective Date and Notice. This ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its adoption, and within fifteen (15) days after its passage shall be published at least once in a newspaper of general circulation published and circulated within the City of Atascadero. In lieu of publication of the full text of the ordinance within fifteen (15) days after its passage, a summary of the ordinance may be published at least five(5) days prior to and fifteen (15) days after adoption by the City Council and a certified copy shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk,pursuant to Government Code section 36933(c)(1). INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council held on 2006, and PASSED and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Atascadero, State of California, on , 2006 by the following roll call vote: AYES NOES ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ATTEST: Tom O'Malley, Mayor Marcia McClure Torgerson, C.M.C., City Clerk Patrick L. Enright, City Attorney 104 3-5.105 Cardrooms. (a) Card Table Defined.The term"card table" as used in this chapter shall mean a card table within a business premises where there is carried on any card game for hire or for compensation,which game is not unlawful under the provision of California Penal Code Section 330, or any other provision of law. (b) (1)Licenses. It is unlawful for any person, firm association, corporation or partnership to engage in or carry on the business of conduction or operating one or more card tables unless there is in effect a card table license covering each such card table, issued pursuant to this Code and pursuant to applicable state law. (2) Standards for Issuance. No more than a total of five (5) card tables shall be licensed to operate within the City underthe provisions of this chapter.No one (1)permittee shall be authorized to operate more than a total of two (2) card tables within the City.No more than two (2) card tables shall be operated or.maintained within any single business premises within the City.No card table license shall be transferable to another location or permittee.No card table license shall be issued to any person who has been convicted of any felony,nor to any association,partnership, or corporation of which any owner thereof has been convicted of a felony. In addition to any other restrictions provided by law, no card table license shall be issued to anyone who is disqualified from holding a State gambling license for any of the reasons specified in California Business and Profession Code Section 9850. (3) Applications for Licenses. Any person desiring to obtain a card table license*shall apply pursuant to Section 3-5.102 et seq. of this chapter. Every application for a card room license shall be subject to objection by the Department of Justice,Division of Gambling Control. If the Division of Gambling Control objects to the issuance of a license, issuance shall be denied. Such a denial may be reviewed only in accordance with the Gambling Control Act. (4) Revocation of Licenses. The City Council shall have the right to revoke any card table license when the possessor thereof has violated, or permitted the violation of, any of the terms of this chapter, or State law, including but not limited to the Labor Code of the State of California. The City shall follow the procedures set forth in Section 3-5.315 of this chapter in processing a revocation of a card table license. (5) Annual Fee:There shall be an annual fee in the amount of five hundred dollars ($500.00) for each card table licensed pursuant to the terms of this Code. (6) Access to Premises. The City Council finds that it is necessary and in the public interest that law enforcement officers have access to any premises in which a card table is being operated under the terms of this chapter. Any premises for which a license has been issued under the provision of this chapter shall be deemed to constitute a public place, and all police officers and peace officers shall at all times have access thereto during business hours. 3-5.105 (c) Operating Restrictions. It shall be unlawful for any person, firm, association, corporation or partnership to operate, or permit the operation of a card table premises in violation of the following restrictions and conditions of operation: (1) Permitted Locations. The playing of all games permitted under this section shall be confined to those designated areas of the cardroom premises as may be set forth in the cardroom permit, and no playing of any games shall be permitted at any other location within or upon the card room premises for which prior written approval from the City has not been obtained. Furthermore, no cardroom license shall be issued to carry on any card room activities where such business is inconsistent with the Zoning Ordinance of the City. The Community Development Department shall review all applications to very compliance with this chapter. In 105 determining whether to approve the location of a proposed cardroom,the City shall take into consideration the effect of the operation of a cardroom on other sensitive uses located in the vicinity of the proposed cardroom, including but not limited to schools,public parks or recreation areas,public buildings with programs for minors, and religious institutions. (2) Disorderly Conduct. All card table permittees, owners,operators, and managers are responsible for insuring that no disorderly conduct occurs on or around the cardroom premises, and that no'other similar conduct occurs on or around the cardroom premises such that it constitutes a breach of the peace or that is otherwise detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare. (3) Hours of Operation. Unless the hours of operation for a cardroom are restricted in the cardroom permit, a cardroom may operate twenty-four(24)hours per day. Each permittee shall clearly post the hours of operation of the cardroom so as to provide law enforcement and cardroom patrons adequate notice of the hours of operation. (4) Bets or Wagers. No card table permittee, owner or employee shall allow any person playing in any game to make any single bet or wager in excess of five hundred dollars ($500.00). (d) Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause,phrase or portion of this section is for any reason deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this section. The City Council of the City of Atascadero`hereby declares that it would have adopted this section and each subsection, sentence, clause,phrase or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact any one or more subsections, sentences, clauses,phrases or other portions might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional. (Ord. 369, 1999: Ord. 258 § 1 (Exh. A(per)), 1992) i 106 ITEM NUMBER: B -4 DATE: 07/11/06 ;a ■ fA® ® a 1918 1979 ,roam Atascadero City Council Staff Report— City Manager's office Atascadero Recreation Center Complex Award (City Bid No. 2006-004) RECOMMENDATIONS: Council: 1. Authorize the City Manager to execute a contract with the lowest responsible bidder in the amount to be determined at a bid opening on July 6, 2006 for construction of the new Atascadero Recreation Center Complex; and, 2. Appropriate additional funding to complete the desired project if costs exceed the funding available. DISCUSSION: Background: The recreation center is an approximately 18,000 square foot tilt-up concrete building. The building is circular and has a brick fagade similar to the bricks covering the historic City Hall. The project includes construction of the recreation center, related driveways and parking, and streetscape improvements along Traffic Way. The interior of the complete recreation center includes a full-size gymnasium, teen center/lounge, game room, internet cafe, kitchen, arts and crafts room, multi- purpose/dance room and a staff office and storage area. Funding for this project comes from state and federal grants, local contributions and reimbursements from an approved OES/FEMA"improved project". Approximately $7.8 million is available for design and construction. Construction costs have continued to accelerate during the past 18 months that the recreation center has been in the design and environmental review stages. While staff has continued to pursue and receive grant moneys to raise the amount of funding available, there is still some concern that the project could exceed available funding. 108 ITEM NUMBER: B -4 DATE: 07/11/06 While the goal is to build the complete 18,000 square foot recreation center, to ensure options for controlling the project's total cost, the recreation center is designed to be built in modules and was put out to bid in several components known as additive alternates." Using the "additive alternate'' process allows for construction of only the parts of the building you most need or can afford. The following diagram shows the complete recreation center project: pq p e � . ........ . �z Floor Plan Recreation Center -City of Atascatlero Base Bid The base bid for the project includes street and exterior improvements, parking, construction of the lobby, the teen center, patio, cafe, kitchen space, restrooms and a full-size gymnasium. The base bid therefore covers the community need for a functional teen center and indoor sports area. Li `I ....._.... 71 PL 109 ITEM NUMBER: B -4 DATE: 07/11/06 • Additive Alternate Number One The first additive alternate fully furnishes the teen center. This includes the elements for the "coffee house" design selected by the F.Y.I Teen Committee, games, sofas and coffee tables. Additive Alternate Number Two This portion of the bid covers expansion of the center into a fully functional community center including areas for art classes, dance lessons, and space for senior citizen activities. Without the addition of this area, the center is primarily a youth center, not a community/recreation center. WO kVk�f 5 - i Additive Alternate Number Three This additive alternate completes the building by including space for a staff office, a community/staff conference room and additional storage space that could be used to hold items related to classes and other recreation activities (such as tables and chairs for banquets or assemblies, etc.). i, f , �t L068X� 1 3 CONF.- SIX Hr 110 ITEM NUMBER: B -4 DATE: 07/11/06 Additive dd e Alternate Number Four This alternate item fully equips the kitchen with appliances and items such as pizza ovens, hot dog makers, freezers etc. Additive Alternate Number Five The final alternate bid completes the recreational needs for the gymnasium such as bleachers, basketball and volleyball equipment, and scoreboards. Deductive Alternate Number One Deductive alternates allow for items to be removed from the cost of a project. One deductive alternate was included for this project. The deduction is the removal of the brick fagade from the second story of the building. Removing this veneer could potentially save hundreds of thousands of dollars. Instead of brickwork, the second story would be painted plaster. The second story are would not have a brick facade, fi v McHT eHeVATN1N X y'XYa.'4F';,yX -'V'�twf Y'1�✓ y NHATI HLHYATNNI •.. .. Exterior Elevations Recreation Center . rr� cny.1 ft—awo Analysis: The project was advertised from May 30, 2006 through July 6, 2006. Bids were opened on July 6, 2006 at 2:00 p.m. The bid list and a supplemental staff report will be presented at the council meeting this evening. The bids will reviewed for accuracy and compliance with the City of Atascadero bidding requirements. Conclusion: Staff will recommend that the City Council award a contract to the lowest responsible bidder for the construction of the Atascadero Recreation Center Complex including all alternates. 111 ITEM NUMBER: B -4 DATE: 07/11/06 FISCAL IMPACT: The following chart summarizes the funding currently appropriated and available: EXPENDITURES Design $501,000 Construction $6,344,000 Inspection / Testing / Construction Administration $275,000 Contingency $630,000 Total Estimated Expenditure: $7,750,000 REVENUES Budgeted Project Funds $7,750,000 Total Revenues: $7,750,000 If bids come in higher for the desired project than the funding available, the City Council has the option to appropriate additional funds. Staff will present different funding options to the City Council at the council meeting. • ALTERNATIVES: 1. Approve the projects with only certain additive alternates. 2. Do not award the contract. Direct staff to re-bid the project. 112 ITEM NUMBER: B 5 DATE: 07/11/06 i9is ® 1979 Aascadero City Council Staff Report - Community Development Department Study Session Condominium Conversions RECOMMENDATION: Council review the attached report and accompanying documentation and direct staff in the policy direction for review and recommendation of condominium conversion projects. DISCUSSION: Background: The City Council held a strategic planning meeting on September 9, 2005 to review the City's General Plan policies in regards to condominium conversions and the potential loss of the City's rental inventory. The Council directed staff to further investigate options for condominium conversion that would be consistent with the General Plan policies of preserving rental housing stock and encouraging the development of affordable homeownership. General Plan Goals and Policies Goal HOS 3s Ensure that an adequate amount of rental housing exists. Policy 3.1: Ensure that the proportion of low and moderate rental housing is not significantly reduced. Staff brought the Condominium Conversion issue to the Council on March 14, 2006, at which time the Council directed staff to enact an emergency moratorium for 45 days until the item could be brought back to the Council for further discussion. Due to difficulty agendizing the issue, the moratorium was extended until May 2007. 114 ITEM NUMBER: B -5 DATE: 07/11/06 Staff has contracted with the firm of Goldfarb Lipmam LLP to assist in the process. Ms. Barbara Kautz is an experts in the fields of condominium conversions, inclusionary housing and redevelopment and have worked with agencies throughout California to tailor similar programs. In order to address the Council's goals for condominium conversion projects Ms. Kautz has developed an Issues and Options Report. The purpose of the Issues and Options Report is to provide the Council with a process to make a number of policy decisions that will be incorporated into the condominium conversion ordinance that will provide guidance to staff and the public for review and recommendation of condominium conversion projects. The Issues and Options Report is included in Attachment 1 to this staff report. Conclusion: Over the last few years, staff has been receiving more and more condominium conversion inquiries. Currently, there are two submitted applications for a total of 48 units tentatively scheduled to go before the Planning Commission on July 18th, 2006. An additional application was submitted for 96 units after the moratorium was enacted. There have been serious inquiries for an additional project that would result in the conversion of an additional 80 units if the property owners decide to move forward with an application. The attached Issues and Options Report will provide information on methods available for processing condominium conversion projects and retaining rental housing inventory. FISCAL IMPACT: Fiscal impact will vary depending upon the options implemented and the methods of implementation. Staff time and resources are currently used to process project requests, however, additional staff time may be required to administer new conversion requirements and policies. ALTERNATIVES: 1. The Council may direct staff to proceed with implementation of selected options for updating and implementing the Condominium Conversion Ordinance. 2. The Council may direct staff not to proceed with updating the Condominium Conversion Ordinance. In this case, Council should provide staff with direction on how to proceed under the current Ordinance and the General Plan policies. 3. The Council may choose to refer the item back to staff for additional analysis. Clear direction to staff should be provided on additional information or policies that are desired. ATTACHMENT: Issues and Options for Atascadero Condominium Conversion, Goldfarb Lipman LLP 115 Attachment 1 Issues and Options for Condominium Conversions Goldfarb Lipman,Attorneys ISSUES AND OPTIONS FOR ATASCADERO CONDOMINIUM CONVERSION ORDINANCE Issue: In the past few months, the City of Atascadero has received an increasing number of applications and inquiries from apartment owners interested in converting their rental units into for-sale condominiums. The issue was presented to the City Council on September 9, 2005, and the Council expressed interest in exploring ways to control the rate of condominium conversions. The purpose of this meeting is for the Council to review and consider possible modifications to the City's existing Subdivision Ordinance relating to condominium conversions. Background: Typically during times when housing prices have been disproportionately high in relation owners in converting existing property own 9 9 to rents, there has been an interest by individual prop y rental units to ownership housing. This appears to be the current situation in Atascadero and throughout San Luis Obispo County: median sales prices in the County have increased dramatically and now exceed $600,000, while rental rates have remained relatively stable. Consequently, apartment owners may be able to maximize i their properties value by converting apartment buildings to condominiums. The present economic situation is reflected in an increased number of condominium conversion applications in Atascadero. Applications have already been. made for the condominiums, and inquiries fries have been made about the mi conversion of 60 rentals to condo q conversion of an additional 200 units. If all of these apartments were to be converted to p condominiums, this would represent the loss of over 12 percent of the 2,100 100 rental units in the City. Other San Luis Obispo County communities have experienced the same increase in applications for conversions. As one response, the County Planning Commission will consider amendments to the County's condominium conversion ordinance on June 2, 2006. The City's primary concern with the loss of rental housing is the loss of an affordable housing stock. A stable supply of reasonably priced rental housing is essential to many service-oriented sectors of the local economy. Apartments converted to condominiums usually offer some of the lowest cost ownership housing. Nonetheless, total ownership costs are nearly always significantly higher than rental costs, and even tenants who can afford increased monthly payments may not have sufficient savings for a down payment and closing costs. Hence, condominium conversions nearly always result in decreased • housing affordability. 116 The California courts have given cities a great deal of discretion to control condominium conversions, especially through a use permit process. In 1985, the California Supreme Court upheld the ability of cities to require use permits for condominium conversions (Griffin Devel. Co: v. City of Oxnard, 39 Cal. 3d 256 (1985)). More recently, the California Court of Appeal agreed that a city could require a use permit for a conversion even after the owner had recorded a final subdivision map unless the owner had also maintained a valid "public report" from the Department of Real Estate at all times (City of West Hollywood v. 1112 Investment Co., 105 Cal. App. 4th 1134(2003)). The effect of these decisions is to enable the City to adopt reasonable policies to limit condominium conversions. Existing City Policies and Subdivision Map Act Requirements The City's Housing Element recognizes the importance of rental housing to the City and provides: "Goal HOS 3: Ensure that an adequate amount of rental housing exists." "Policy 3.1: Ensure that the proportion of low and moderate housing is not significantly reduced." The City's Subdivision Ordinance was amended in 2000 to include certain controls on condominium conversions. These provide primarily for notification to tenants, public hearings, and property improvement standards for buildings to be converted. However, the Subdivision Ordinance does not control the rate of conversions nor include provisions to preserve affordable rental housing. Policy Options Below is a brief discussion of policy options for review by the Council. The attached "Issues and Options Table" provides more detail regarding provisions in other condominium conversion ordinances. It also provides more detail about the advantages and disadvantages of each approach. A. Reduction in the Rate or Number of Condominium Conversions At the Council's March 14, 2006 meeting, Councilmembers expressed interest in controlling the rate of condominium conversions in Atascadero. The primary mechanisms used by cities are these: 1. Placing an annual limit on the number of apartment units that may convert to condominiums. Given the relatively small number of rental units in Atascadero, the City would need to establish a fairly low annual quota if it did not want to risk losing its entire stock of rental units. For instance, a quota of 100 units/year i would enable the entire rental stock to convert to condominiums over a 20- 117 year period. Even with a low quota, this approach has the disadvantage of permitting a continuing loss of rental housing in the City. 2. Allowing conversions .only when the vacancy rate reaches a certain percentage, usually 5%. At the Council's March study session, several members of the public expressed particular interest in this approach because it is the most market-based. A potential difficulty with this option is that, should the vacancy rate increase to 5%, a large percentage of the rental properties in the City could convert in a small amount of time. The Council might therefore want to combine this approach with an annual limit on the number of conversions. 3. Requiring that multifamily rentals constitute a fixed percentage of the housing supply, or allowing conversions only when new multifamily rental housing is constructed. This is the approach now used by the City of San Luis Obispo and proposed to be used by the County. San Luis Obispo now permits conversions for half the number of new multifamily units constructed. This approach ensures that the number of rental units in the City steadily increases. However, it tends to increase rents because conversions typically occur in older buildings with lower rents, while newly constructed apartments normally have higher rents. 4. Permitting conversions in only certain types of buildings. For example, the City of Dublin allows only buildings with fewer than 21 units to convert to condominiums. To decide if this might be an appropriate approach, the City would need to inventory its rental housing stock to determine a reasonable cutoff point. After the Council determines which approach it prefers, we will prepare an ordinance that includes those provisions. B. Inclusionary Requirement or Retention of Existing Affordability At the March 14, 2006 study session, the Council was also interested in examining ways to preserve the existing affordable housing stock even in the event that conversions were permitted. Some options are: 1. Require converted units to conform to current inclusionary ordinances or policies established for new construction, or require an even higher percentage of affordable units in converted buildings. 2. Require that the proportion of affordable units remain the same before and after the conversion, or allow existing lower or moderate income tenants to purchase their unit at an affordable price. 118 San Luis Obispo County is proposing to require that any "existing, legally established affordable housing" in a converted building be retained at the same level of affordability. Since in this case the City's goal is to keep existing affordable units, if the City chooses to retain affordable units, it may be most appropriate for the City to limit the resale price of these condominiums to ensure that they always remain affordable. Again, once the Council determines which approach it prefers, we will prepare an ordinance that includes specific provisions. C. Protections for Existing Tenants Some of the most common additional protections include these: 1. Tenant Relocation Plans/Moving Expenses. It is relatively common for ordinances to require the payment of two to three months rent as a relocation payment. San Luis Obispo County, for instance, proposes to require a payment of two months' rent. 2. Ordinances may also require the subdivider to prepare a tenant relocation plan for existing tenants. The plans are similar to those required when a public agency relocates a tenant. The plan includes benchmark dates and options for existing tenants to help them make informed decisions on whether to stay and what to expect should they be relocated. 3. Protections for the Elderly and Disabled and Children Attending School Some jurisdictions require lifetime leases or otherwise extend leases for existing tenants who are disabled or elderly (over the age of 62). 4. Households with school age children are often allowed to remain as tenants until the end of the school year so that children are not forced to change schools during the middle of a school year. 5. Additional Limits on Rent Increases Pending Conversion. Atascadero now does not permit the subdivider to raise rents for 180 days after the tenant is given notice of the conversion. Some communities extend this period to 12 months. 6-. Additional Notices to Tenants. Cities commonly require converters to provide existing tenants with staff reports, summaries of tenant benefits, and additional notice of public hearings. Atascadero's existing ordinance contains similar provisions, although it may want to consolidate these requirements. The proposed San Luis Obispo County ordinance, for example, requires a detailed "Tenant Information Package" explaining not 119 only the conversion process, but also the condition of the building and the impact of the conversion on existing tenants. D. Development Standards Atascadero's current ordinance imposes physical conditions on condominium conversions and requires a detailed Property Condition Report. The ordinance already includes the physical requirements most commonly imposed in other cities' conversion ordinances. Some additional physical requirements that the City may want to consider include: Common open space. • Common recreation facilities. On-site lighting systems. • One-hour fire protection. Disabled accessibility. • Compliance with current building codes. E. CC & R Requirements Atascadero's ordinance already imposes certain standards on CC & Rs for condominium conversions and requires a copy of the CC & Rs as part of the tentative map application. The attached table lists several additional provisions included in other cities' ordinances. F. Process We would recommend that the City require a use permit for condominium conversions and consolidate the requirements in the City's zoning ordinance. Under the court decisions referenced earlier, requiring a use permit will give the City the maximum ability to regulate condominium conversions. Conclusion Of these policy options, those that would be most likely to retain affordable rental housing are the possible limitations on the rate of conversions and additional inclusionary requirements. The Council should review the options and indicate which should be included in an amended condominium conversion ordinance. Following the receipt of policy direction from the Council, we will prepare a draft ordinance for the Council's review. 120 a� v � W0co � Z Er 00 CL QQ N -oa ° 0 QL 0 -0 Q > 0- 0 U ZQ o c cn E cu co c)-� � � �. � � �c aa)i 0 ) _0 a) � o 0) a) � � cm 0C W °' 0 0 " ' ;� _C L) MOLaca) Eo L ° � -0c C - N : O _>, >, 0 a) a) -0 a) N cn a) a) D O a) C a) C/) � a) 00x0 � a) soca � L eco Z O 0 rt? a) - E"0 5 CV - o N N Co0 c a) CD 0 0 c s= o cn � -0 u0i (� r > 30 -0 � a) o � ca LL � Ocn mE • N o N c 0 � > ° E . o c � m>' N ca E • N o 0 � •`� �, 0 c a) o >, ai c cn '� c 0 c � L c c' a) c ED C: > 0 -0 c 0 > C - 0 � -ib N > 0ur � a) � ON � � cu m a) c � E cEooocc>am � oa) ,ch a) � > o nca w .cnEU � � a) � UJ a L 0 0 0 �' 0 — -r- a) �� � � -c t + -0 � N N v Q. (n O N (E6 L O O � �� O O (a �, O c (6 E E a) O o o N-0 00 >, Q O A ,� a) � >, E cu m n := ° a) a) 0 C) - � oc�a � c0- > C a) oc� O n caXi0 > 0 � c' ° N >, o 0 >,0 Lo t0 0 ,- O Q O OV O o c 0) O O O ,L U o M L v 0 L m o L C O cn C L N (� S- O a) V O O L rt+ L 0 4- L r� -0 U) (n -.r Q a c0a � � a > >, � a) 0 N o L > a) z � L C a) C _ (D a) - 0 L) CO Q LL 0 C Q Oco c 'ca c cz � 0 c 0 o — cam � � 0 � � 0 c U > � 'ca .E L Q L E LL cn0 (6 (p O 0 �d a OU � m CV o (6 ° C6 E U fn U d L O U d = 0 • fA U O a) c3 r a) _ = 0 Q LL LL V a > +r 122 o _ Arno U) o c 0c .� cL � 0 � c `� E � � a) ca oO 0U = _� o c 0 ° c (n o0 ° _ _0 oa� oo > > O L L N + cn (D L Qom = c- -oa) (VC: _ 0 0c -0c0- E _00N00 � U Ho oo -6cE � uc � U a) O a) O - L a) L CO c cn + -p .� O O d (0 a) O U 0 O L O cn m O (D O RS U C a) D C (D N (n (D cn a) (� c E ° CD >' a) a) E CD ca o 2 to 3 0 0 -0 — " - 0)— -0 c o _ a) U +� (n - c) L �, o (0 c� L U) a) O a) a "0 c s o 0 �.. — E o a) > a) i .� 0 0 -0 — o ,� � � x .� a) O O 0 aflico0 � � � aQ °)--oo � c° � � a) v7 L o � c C: o c = c �w U) 0 � 0aci o � � o � � �, ca ° a) ». o ,� Co ,� o a) aa) ' a) a) a o .S � o EoN � E � � o0 (n � Nv o c o ° N Cu aa)i Cr c 0 p > c 0 — c6 — � '<nQ '0 f— D� W c E U W 0 cn N a) _ a) O cmC6 N .. (6 �. O c N -0 m cn a) -O J — c6 '«r -0 (m= c .r -0 a) cn co 0 0 E 0 � �O � O o a) a) � O -p cn 3 O .o p c - C "0 O - .. N O 0 d a) L '- O N C6 V O N ' c . .r O m Q N a) in (D o p a) .O a) cz N = C c U (n 7 0 "- - � (n d Q p O O -p U U c L O a) N O a) a) L p E Ln .- c - '> m = 0 - s N O a) U cn cn U > O C E O -0 C O Q N O O a) "0 co Q) -0 O O N - �, L >, m m c6 o tm 0CE � L- L � ° mL-'t (n -= at::: m 'nE - - o. cn C) > > � c � a) u, a) 0EOc`a °) "= o cam r_ T-O N c 0 L c m ` � m � "O •- c _0 3 � � o •N •� o oma. 0 0Y � � no o c 0 co -0 0) (D c L- U) Cc >, cn >, >,_ -0 � c� '� L a) •� o E m a) Co =a i Q. E ca oF c 2 c � 0 0 o c6 ca cr " a) cr o J � � 0 a) � c� � � c40 > O 0 a) > -0o N � c CD M 0 o a) N C E a L a) N M i aw" W O O O Q 123 a� c E c E O U > c 0 U a) � 0 _ o o 0 — cn n '> L -C O C 'O N C T O O N QS Q N .- a) tO N E, E r E N (6 N > M p U _0 U C -2 C M CL a) • r -aN O N a) � (Q a L • � (Q p (,) 0U � C ca .� � � � .N p C a) a) 5 p C =3 CO W a °) aE o> E a) M f/) j C O a) >,.0 to c @ O CO w J ++ m O O p) > a) � a) N cn E N p O C 4- Q- E Q) cu N fly ) p ` '� O j `I'. � E O O L' O _ m y O O O 'D a) E N O N '� O O O U Q" p O p m C t V O C 0 E OV O m a O A C Fr C � O O w N O N O C .- N C)0 p)� - L O O /(�6 �, C c O M M • a (6 p -1 w+ CD -p -O C C C N �� crC d C C U �� Q. 0 o co N C oO m � (6 a) > Q CO N N 'p N N p E o a) a) C C) a) N U C C6 �— N p 0 0 //�� C- a) C C a) — N U m a) �-- a) C > p p a �.� t O �''O Nom-+ C w- ' D C N co Cl) Q p E L Y O C = (� C O (� N U _p C O N N V (6 4-- N f6 � m .0 N Q O C6 O >, o . O C L C C (6 co aM o (B 'E = O U)0 :3 .-+ 'v � (6 Q O L O C-Q C N .(n m N (� U C. > U '_ O .p C 0 CL O C U N r W 0 C C6 O N � m mo O • N 0O •++ N yN, • •a p LC QQn. �° i— 124 • c o o O •^ O •0 ca O — to = _ U � � � ° "a ) U � � � CD (6 O .� �-= > (Q O Op O 0- 'a Q Q t0 i a) �_ C CO O.N N C v C U O a) (6 a) O .- 0 O a) N C 0 O (NO .0 O O C U Q o L p E c ��� v -0 M � m -0 o v � � or '- voMooc0 � ° °° ° o o o cn O '. o Q E a� c a� •N � e N C Q N W co � Ci- a) as O -0 O i N N C 0 - G9 > � a) O 0) p C Q -0 L O C > w L a) 0 C Y i a) Q C C Q O .� C V cn f6 to m (SS a) 0 f6 0 n f6 ``^^ '^ C L) co V O L c m O E O m N N Q OU v� 4- •p N a a) a) OV :tE 6 O � L c� 4- O 0 O d c C N i U �_ c N >i c0 O O F- E .O L D t0 W Cp �0 'tn Y o3 L- m U N 0 O (� C0 C *�- Q) L O O fa y f6 -O ^ U C 0 d U) U O O -0 � N O -C V °? ° Z '� m 4- oU � �° � cinoc ai cC 0 >+O c4- CD 3 o O C N 0 0 C 0 ,O J J m O Q CO C C c`v Q O E 0 L � Q C Z a o N Q cY6 0 m U � J Z a) L m Q a� Q t: m M n3 U ° ;� n m m cn cYi U ns o cn d a��i d U) • 125 JEE N oO7 N _ .LCC O O E O > dL f6 O '0 .- 0 0 3 o U) c !6 E _ U) O 'O O O O o 0) a) >' m N L Q L _0 U (a C o E L U L y V > U m Q E O Q N m U C U) C N n Y o V 'a U o N fa O fn Q o .� U -0 E— - i N C O U O as • O — NoL CL 0 n O C ._ C o L LL _ c N O Q 0)� 00 U) O `� m N o U 11 COU co rz = o U O CM N o U O � N O N O C .L o fB C O Y O 7 0 Q. N -O N p O C (6 (6 O O (LS O M " (n U "_ N N IL C N N i� o E n. L U U O 'Q — O N t6 O o O cB O E C N m � U) N U Q co cn N z N -a Zoo U ccn 0 pN � O �' c CL 'r-=3 Q E � o cn U • O N Q) y cn N M Y � 9 Ln U ~ C � O N N 3 C d W d • N CL L - N o � > QaoU) 126 a� v � c L can)C -L—O O C fQ N O O V M tnU E -O O N 0 ,a U > � � — co _ o2S dS iz 000 -0 L .N O U Q w N w N ^ . L .. '0 OE O •a O O �+ "= cn O ^ O co Q O- 0 Co ++ cn f2 0 N C L V C CO sZ O N C-6 .Q N -� — O cn O :3U • d N C > > C a N U '0 L- U r- C =p .0 N CU �O O O Q � O O CD cn It- 0) � � O � Q ) m CLL • d N O t6 O N to 0) `` C C6 E 0- C1 CU 0 O p O E co O ( N 'C7 N > w CL � CU U 2 N CU C -p 0 Q U O C6 0 COCO 0 J �- E0 Z � CL +- O Co O Q -0 N 0- M O d U 2 L6 U U) C I CD CV • E N � .O U aai 127 ITEM NUMBER: B -6 DATE: 07/11/06 1918 9 1979 Atascadero City Council Staff Report- City Clerk Designation of Voting Delegate - League of California Cities' Annual Conference RECOMMENDATION: Council designate a voting representative and an alternate who will be present at the Annual Business Meeting of the League of California Cities' Annual Conference in September 2006, and direct the City Clerk to inform the League of the designation. DISCUSSION: This years .League of California Cities Annual Conference is scheduled for Wednesday, September 6th through Saturday, September 9th, in San Diego. One very important aspect of the Annual Conference is the Annual Business Meeting when the membership takes action on conference resolutions. Annual 'Conference resolutions guide cities and the League in their efforts to improve the quality, responsiveness and vitality of local government in California. Each City Council is asked to designate a voting representative and an alternate who will be present at the Annual Business Meeting. League bylaws provide that each city is entitled to one vote in matters affecting municipal or League policy. FISCAL IMPACT: None 128. ATTACHMENT A The DFG did not feed the proposed project could meet their approval. The mitigations • outlined in the FEIR might create a project DFG could consider as mitigating impacts to less than significant, but would necessitate deleting 14 lots and implementing all other mitigation measures outlined in Sections NA &B and Map 10. Without thesechanges to chan the project the DFG would not consider impacts mitigated to P roI less than significance and a Statement of Overriding Considerations would be required. The DFG supports the cluster alternative as the environmentally superior alternative. Traffic Safety Considerable public comment revolved around the projected increase in traffic on Cenegal and Laurel Roads and the San Marcos and Los Altos Roads. In both cases,the EIR projects that daily trips will exceed 500 about midway in project.buildout and approach or exceed 800 at full project and area buildout for these road segments. The City's Circulation Element encourages street system design that keeps trips below 500 ADT for local streets. The 3F Meadow site was designated as a special study area in the Circulation Element for several reasons. First, it represents a major block of undeveloped land in single ownership, thus facilitating comprehensive planning;.second, the current colony roads are manifestly difficult to develop, which points to further analysis of alternative alignments;and third, the trip distribution to surrounding local streets would be difficult to predict until a proposal for internal roads and lot configurations is put forward. The Circulation Element notes that the volume standard of 500 ADT for local streets is much lower than the capacity of the roadway based on level of service considerations alone. In other words,a two lane local street could accommodate 800ADT depending on alignment geometries. However, the Element notes that traffic above the standards may cause residents to become concerned about noise,speeding, child safety and loss of privacy. The Element goes on to establish that plans for new development should be reviewed to ensure that existing roadways already carrying traffic volumes at or near the standards are not used where reasonable alternatives exist. In the case of 3F Meadows no feasible alternative to using Cenegal,Laurel,Los Altos and San Marcos Roads exists. The potential for abridge connection from Cenegal to Santa Lucia over Graves Creek was examined and found to have significant constraints environmentally (deterioration of creek environment) and with respect to vertical geometrics and sight distance at Santa Lucia Road. This bridge alternative would not fully alleviate traffic increases on Cenegal and would have short term traff c impacts to the downstream Santa Lucia bridge near Llano Drive. Equitable funding of construction would be another issue. The FEIR has included clarification of the improvements deemed appropriate to mitigate traffic impacts on Cenegal,Laurel, San Marcos and Los Altos roads._This is the result of further field review and discussion among staff, the applicant and the EIR consultant _ team. - The Circulation Element anticipated that collector roads could be needed in and out of the • 3F Meadows study area. However a review of historic accident records seems to indicate that safety is not so much an issue of traffic volume as road geometry. Therefore, the recommended mitigation measures are more related to correcting safety problems than expanding road capacity. U-3 78 i; +- - The clarifications include the stipulation that San Marcos Road be improved to Previously constructed standards and accepted as a City street prior to lot development and that Cenegal and Laurel Roads have roadway improvements and a pedestrian path. The trigger for off--site street improvements is 500 ADT instead of a certain number of lots, and specific improvements have been identified in a letter from the applicant. These improvements are subject to additional refinements as conditions of approval for the project. Uniform widening of Cenegal, Laurel, San Marcos and Los Altos Roads to collector standards would entail significant grading and tree removal impacts based on site reconnaissance. Therefore this approach is not recommended as a traffic mitigation. Schools The Atascadero Unified School District requested that the FEIR specifically list information on school impacts contained in their letter sent in response to the Notice of [EIRJ Preparation, and for the text to state that they are on record as requesting an agreement for mitigation beyond the required development impact fee. The FEIR also notes that the development impact fee is considered by the City as the only enforceable school impact mitigation under the law. Air Quality The San Luis Obispo County APCD is in the process of updating its guidelines. The APCD has requested that the air quality modeling be rerun using a variety of different analysis assumptions. The revised emission forecast is shown in Section IV-G of the Final EIR. In addition,the APCD is on record as su pporting the cluster alternative project. Many ofthe mitigation strategies suggested by the APCD are notfeasible in this project as well as much of western Atascadero because of terrain and land use patterns established by the General Plan. Fire Safety Based on responses by the City Fire Department, additional information on existing response time and impacts on fire protection capabilities is included in the FEIR. The department desires to maintain or improve the fire protection insurance rating city-wide. The proposed project would not maintain or improve this rating because of remoteness. Once the future fire station is built on Santa Lucia Road this effect would diminish. Until then the City is faced with the prospect of residential growth outpacing the ability to both maintain or improve its fire protection rating and to provide the desired level of fire service set in the General Plan. However, the fact that the project is phased and would probably not build out for 10 years could be considered as offsetting this problem. A fuel reduction plan that balances wildlife and fire safety issues has been added to the FEIR. II-a 79 Table S: SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES (Cont.) CLASS H. SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS THAT CAN BE MITIGATED OR AVOIDED (Decision makers must make "Findings" under Section 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines if the project is approved). Level of Impact Mitization Measure After Mitigation Traffic Safety: Project traffic Identify areas of insufficient pavemen Insignificant will adversely impact Cenegal and shoulder width and widen as necessary. Laurel Roads to the northeast of the - Provide curve widening as required by project and San Marcos Read and City standards. Los Altos Roads between the project • Provide stop bars at the intersections boundary and Los Altos Hwy 41 to of Laurel and Cenegal and Laurel and the south of the project because these Santa Lucia roads are not currently up to City - Repair all pavement cracks and holes standards for rural hillside collector t " streets. deteriorated shoulders • Provide pedestrian path on Cenegal and Laurel on one side of the road - Repair/reconstruct San Marcos Road to level acceptable to City Engineer prior to construction of any on-site roads. (City to accept as City- maintained street.) Project traffic will adversely impact Develop a left turn lane for eastbound Insignificant the intersection of Los Altos Road Morro Road traffic to enter onto Los and Highway 41. Lack of sight Altos Road and driveway, out of the distance creates hazard at intersection way of oncoming traffic, of Highway 41 and driveway for lots Develop refuge lanes for vehicles 109-112. turning left onto Morro Road from Los Altos Road and driveway. - Provide 550 feet of sight distance in either direction for vehicles stopped at Los Altos Road and driveway. • Provide signage along Morro Road to alert drivers to the approaching intersection. Also provide signage indicating left tum land ahead. • Per biological and archaeological surveys to Caltrans standards in Hwy 41 areas affected by widening. - A designated right turn lane is required at the intersection at Hwy 41. i H-6 80 D. TRAFFIC SAFETY ` r 1 . Environmental Issue The propos project ect will add 5.5 miles to the city street network and ultimately serve � nearly 300 residents. Existing streets serving the area will experience traffic increases. The City Circulation Element identifies the project area as a special study area in recognition of the difficulties in developing a road network in compliance with city standards in that area. 2. Environmental Setting and. Impacts The project is served by a network of roads leading from downtown Atascadero. There are two main roads accessing the project; San Marcos Road, and Cenegal Road. One other connection has been considered for this project; that would be connecting Cenegal Road to the existing Escabrosa Road right-of-way and improving Escabrosa to State Highway 41. Additional access would be beneficial to the project,however, due to the extreme environmental impact and the high cost of fof the constructingthis ani alt's ,road, this access is not viable, and was discarded as an option as a result Based upon analysis of the proposed street alignment,it is expected that the two primary routes will split the trip distribution in and out of the fully developed project. The primary routes will be Cenegal to Santa Lucia to Traffic Way and San Marcos to Los Altos to State Highway 41 (Morro Road). Assuming eight trips per residence per day the 111 new lots will increase the total - average daily trips (ADT)by 888 trips. If 50%.of the trips occur along each primary route then the ADT will increase by 444 trips each to Santa Lucia Road and to Morro Road. A traffic volume count taken during a 24 hour period in November of 1991 indicated a total of 2496 trips on Santa Lucia Road west of Portola. Combining that amount with the 444 trips generated by this project, the daily trips to this intersection will reach an estimated 2,940 trips. Existing volume on Santa Lucia west of Llano Road are 500-600 ADT based on 1994 traffic counts. In 1991 there were 14 traffic accidents reported on Santa Lucia. Nine of these accidents were single car accidents,one was a bicycle accident without a car involved, one was a bicycle and car collision and the remaining three were collisions between cars. Alcohol or drugs were involved in three of the accidents. These statistics indicated that the number of cars on the road is not causing significant problems,rather, other conditions like weather, animals,road geometry and driver negligence are the dominant causes of accidents. Morro Road at Los Altos Road(via San Marcos Road)currently experiences an ADT of 6,400 trips. The ADT.will increase to 6,844 upon completion of the 3F Meadows project. This intersection can be fairly dangerous due to the high speeds traveled along Morro Road. The current peak hours of traffic volume for these areas are from 7:,15 AM to 8:15 AM and from 5:00 PM to_6:00 PM, representing 8.4% and 10% of the total traffic volume -. respectively. 81 The City of Atascadero Circulation Element defines levels of service as the following: . Descriptions of Traffic Conditions Service Level Intersections Arterials Category (Average Length of Wait) (Average Speed) Free Flowing Most vehicles do not.have to stop. On the Vehicles can maneuver completely (IAS A) average; each driver waits less than 5 seconds unimpeded and without restrictions on to get through intersection. speed caused by other cars and delays at intersections. Minimal Delays Some vehicles have to stop, although waits are Drivers feel somewhat restricted within (IAS B) not bothersome. Average wait at intersections traffic stream and slightly delayed at is 5 to 15 seconds. intersections. Average speed is about 70 percent of free flow. i Acceptable Delays Significant numbers of vehicles have to stop Traffic still stable, but drivers may feel (LOS C) because of steady, high traffic volumes. Still, restricted in their ability to change lanes. many pass through without stopping. On the They begin to feel the tension of traffic. average,vehicles have to wait 15 to 25 seconds Delays at intersections contribute to lower to get through intersection. average speeds -- about 50 percent of free flow. Tolerable Delays Many vehicles have to stop. Drivers are aware High traffic volumes and delays at (LOS D) of heavier traffic. Cars may have to wait intersections reduce average travel speeds through more than one red light Queues begin to 40 percent of free flow. Drivers aware of to form, often on more than one approach. On slower pace of traffic.. the average,vehicle wait is 25 to 40 seconds. Significant Delays Cars may have to wait through more than one High traffic volume and many signalized (LOS E) light. Long queues form,sometimes on several intersections with long queues reduce approaches. Average waits of 40 to 60 average travel speed to one-third of free seconds. flow. Excessive Delays Intersection is jammed. Many cars have to wait Travel is"stop and go"--one-third or one- 010S F) through more than one red light, or more than fourth of free flow. Usually caused by a 60 seconds. Traffic may backup into up-stream "down stream" obstruction, such as lanes intersections. This condition often viewed as reduced from 4 to 3, or a stalled car, or a gridlock. signal preemption for a train. 1. "Average wait"is a measure of traffic conditions at intersections. It is an estimate of the average delay for all vehicles entering the intersection in a defined period of time, for example, the evening peak hour. It is expressed as a range rather than a single value. Some drivers will actually wait more or less time than indicated by the range.- 2. "Average speed"is a measure of traffic conditions on arterials. "Average speed"is based on the total time it takes to travel a certain distance,including the time spent waiting at intersections. It is determined more by traffic volume and conditions at intersections, than by the legal speed limit. Santa Lucia Road at Portola will increase in total volume from 2,496 to 2,940. This is an approximate increase of 17.8%. Morning and evening peaks will increase proportionately. Currently Santa Lucia Road enjoys a LOS A-B status. Santa Lucia Road is a rural collector road with a projected ADT in the year 2010 of 4,400 according to the City of Atascadero Circulation Element. The Circulation Element sets 3,000 ADT as a_threshold for requiring improvements to existing collector streets. The increase in . total volume from this project willnot significantly impact its LOS, but should plant it firmly in the LOS B category. -- Although the Circulation Element does not include current trip counts for Cenegal and Laurel Roads that lead to Santa Lucia Road, the addition of 444 project trips will cause significant traffic safety impacts because these roads are not currently designed to collector street standards. Based on the approximate number of residences in the area existing trips are estimated at 240 ADT._ The volume at buildout of 3F Meadows and IV-D2 82 other currently undeveloped lots in the area would be about 800 ADT. The volume is significantly over the General Plan goal of a maximum of 500 ADT on local streets,but still within an acceptable level of service. Morro Road at Los Altos Road will increase in total volume from 6,400 trips to 6,844 trips. This is an approximate increase of 7%. Morning and afternoon peaks.will increase proportionately. This will not significantly impact Morro Road however, due to the high rate of speed most vehicles travel along Morro Road the wait time during the morning peak could see a significant increase. At the full buildout,it is probable that the LOS for the intersection of Los Altos Road at Morro Road could approach LOS C.All other times of the day should maintain a LOS B. The proposed road sections conform to the City of Atascadero standards for rural hillside local street and rural hillside collector street (city standard drawings 402 and 404). These sections are appropriate for this project, however, grading associated with the construction of the above referenced road sections will have significant impacts in some areas. Substantial cuts and fills exist throughout the proposed alignments with, numerous fills exceeding 40 feet in vertical height. See Tables D1-D3 for a complete analysis of these impacts relating to road geometry and refer to Section IVA Landform Modification for additional discussion of grading impacts. The proposed project includes areas in which curve radii have been reduced to aid in minimizing the grading that would result from larger radii. This is acceptable because of the low volumes of on site traffic. The rates of grade for the roadways in this project conform to the City of Atascadero standards and standard engineering practice. However, areas in which maximum vertical grade is combined with below minimum curve radii should be avoided. Some proposed cul-de-sacs exceed state fire protection standards and nearly all the proposed.cul-de-sacs on this project exceed the City of Atascadero standards for length. Refer to Tables D1-D3 for a detailed analysis of road geometry problems on proposed roads. 3 . Mitigation Measures a. The impact of the increased traffic volume along Santa Lucia Road can be mitigated by a comprehensive program of signage and striping, as outlined in the City of Atascadero Circulation Element for collector roads approaching or exceeding 3,000 ADT. b. (see-114ap-43): Cenegal and Laurel Roads(between Cenegal and Santa Lucia)shall be upgraded at such time that the ADT will be exceeding 500 trips and therefore exceeds the standards for a local street as set forth in the circulation element for the City of Atascadero. Through field investigation, this threshold is found to be met when the project buildout reaches 30 lots accessing Santa Lucia Road (see Map 12). The following off-site road upgrades are recommended to mitigate increased traffic volume: 1) Provide a 3 foot wide decomposed granite walkway along one side of the existing road. 2) Identify below minimum radius curves and widen the pavement at the inside edge(less than 100 foot centerline radius add 4 feet, 101 to 150 foot radius add 3 feet, 151 to 200 foot radius add 2 feet). 3) Provide centerline striping and stop bars. Provide additional signage and striping as deemed necessary by the City Engineer. N D3 83 4 Repair all cracks and holes-and P and repair deteriorating or inadequate paving edges and shoulders. C. San Marcos Road from the project boundary to the intersection of Los Altos Road shall be upgraded to previously constructed standards and accepted by the Ciryfor maintenance prior to construction of project roads. Los Altos Road and Morro Road rrumt r • (State Highway 41) at Los Altos Road shall be upgraded when ,1,� ��, 1 o *�ssing -r^ the traffic volume on Los Altos Road reaches 500 ADT. 14a=t--pJ7mFd_e_n V. ted Fe-Aeasb-shaH The Los Altos mprovements require upgrades as described above in items 3b-2 through 3b4. The following off-site road upgrades are recommended volume at fointersection of o m Altos ate safety hazards created by increased traffic Road; 1) Develop a left turn lane for East bound Morro Road traffic to enter onto Los way of on-coming traffic. out of the g Altos Road o Y 2) Develop a refuge lane for vehicles turning left onto Morro Road from Los Altos Road. Develop right turn lane for West bound Morro Road traffic. 3 P g s 4) Provide 550 feet of sight distance m either direction for vehicles stopped at Lo Altos Road. 5) Provide signage along Morro Road to alert drivers to the approaching City intersection. Additional signage as directed by the Cty Engineer. d. Approximately 3/4 of a mile west of Los Altos Road lots 109 through 112 will be entering onto Morro Road from a proposed access � , nature of this access point location, the upgrades liroad. Due to the hazardous sted in mitigation measure c above shall apply here as well. These improvements will be necessary at such time that the Lots 109 through 112 access (or any portion thereof) is constructed. Lots 109 through 112 shall also be counted as contributing to the trigger amount for upgrades at the Los Altos Road intersection. associated with the grading of this project, the e. In order to mitigate the impacts assoc following design objectives should be explored; l 1) Additional analysis of the finished grade vertical profiles to achieve a tighter conformance to the existing grades using exceptions to standards -se-as ==sabove,if necessary.up to 20% should be allowed(with.City Engineer approval)for Steep grades should only be short distances along rural collector roads. considered in areas of straight or semi-straight sections of roadway and only when there is clear evidence of impact mitigation associated with the steeper grade, such as eliminating or significantly downsizing a wall or a large slope. 3) Use of retaining and/or crib walls to minimize or eliminate major slopes f. Consider realignment of San Marcos Road as it enters the project to curve away from the woodland area following an alignment similar to the driveway for Lot 1 and continuing on in the general vicinity of the existing dirt road(through Lots 2,3, and 4) to Paso Verde Court (which would become San Marcos). Connect back into the original alignment tangent to the curve at the San Marcos/Rojo Court intersection. (Refer to Map 11-Composite Mitigations in Section IV-B.) IV-D5 84 Consider realignment of Cabezon to begin a curve at appmximately station 13+00 and continue through Lots 99 and 98 to intersect with San Marcos Road. This would eliminate the steep fill section through a high vegetation,Area that is currently proposed (see Map 11). - k Consider realignment of Rojo Court to continue through Lots 16 and 17 connecting to Cenegal Court creating a looped access (see Map 11). g® , , suFfaeing and tffneutsAumueands. This (Above mitigation deleted because this access road may not be desirable or feasible due to the constraints associated with constructing this road in the existing San Cayetano right-of-way.) h. Incorporate specific case mitigation measures tabulated on Tables D1-D3, as appropriate, into the final plans to mitigate grading impacts road geometry deficiencies, including retaining walls, flatter horizontal curves, and additional pavement width at curves. 4. Analysis of Significance Impacts from additional traffic on Cenegal and Laurel Road, and the Los Altos/Morro Road intersection.can be mitigated to less than significant levels by striping,turn lane additions, and road widening at the point that buildout of 3F Meadows reaches 38 homes accessing Santa Lucia Road and 27 homes accessing Morro Road. Based on the applicant's phasing plan, improvements to the Los Altos/Morro Road intersection would occur in Phase One, Improvements to Cenegal and Laurel Roads would occur in Phase Three. Site distance improvements to Caltrans standards at the intersection of Morro Road and the driveway for lots 109-112 may be difficult to meet, resulting in a significant unavoidable impact on traffic safety. Gul de sae lengths erweed City Fire DepaFanent ' and mitheut findings by s Road geometry changes to avoid tight radii and vertical profiles would mitigate on-"site J traffic safety impacts to less than significant levels. Additional earthwork to accomplish J some of the road geometry changes would result in significant impacts that can be mitigated to less than significant levels by constructing walls and restoring slopes with native woodland. i IV-D6 85 ATTACHMENT B Attachment`B" (PD-11) 3-F Meadows Off--Site Improvements (3) Road Improvements—Off-Site. (i) Curve widening shall be constructed on Los Altos Road from Highway 41 to San Marcos Road where curve radii is less than two hundred(200)feet. Curve widening shall be constructed in conformance with Section 4,Paragraph F of the City Standard Specifications, or as approved by the City Engineer.Plans for the curve widening shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer prior to the approval of the Master Development Plan. The curve widening on Los Altos Road shall be constructed when the ADT on Los Altos Road reaches five hundred(500)vehicles per day, with the development of the twenty- seventh lot in Phase 1,or within three(3)years of the issuance of building permits for Phase 1,whichever is earlier. (ii)A"Stop" sign and stop bar shall be constructed at the intersection of Los Altos Road and San Marcos Road and shall be constructed with the development of Phase 1 of the project and prior.to the issuance of building permits. (iii) San Marcos Road between Los Altos Road and the project boundary shall be improved preparatory to acceptance of this portion of road into the City maintained system. Curve widening shall be constructed where curve radii is less than two hundred(200) feet. Curve widening shall be constructed in conformance with Section 4,Paragraph F of the City Standard Specifications, or as approved by the City Engineer.Improvement plans for the curve widening shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer prior to approval of the Master Development Plan. San Marcos Road between Los Altos Road and the project boundary shall be improved prior to the development of Phase 1 of the project and prior to the issuance of building permits. (iv)The applicant shall enter into a maintenance agreement with the City for the portion of San Marcos Road between Los Altos Road and the project boundary. The agreement shall guarantee that damage to the road which results from construction traffic generated by the development of the project is properly repaired. The agreement shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and the City Attorney. The agreement shall remain in- force throughout construction of Phase l and Phase 2 of the project. A maintenance security in a form acceptable to the City Attorney and the City Engineer shall be posted for the portion of San Marcos Road between Los Altos Road and the project boundary. The maintenance security shall remain effective until final acceptance of both Phase 1 and Phase 2 of the project. 86 ATTACHMENT C 'x.'.30/2006 09:51 FAX 8055430752 AMB Q002/010 MEMO o CA 93401 •tic.No.659554 • FAX 549.8514 • 805-549-8100 . ffi-nER 202 N41 ndc Farm Road,San Luis Obispo, CONSTRUCTION,INC SAN?v1ARC0S ROAD ADDITIONAL I APROVEMENTS AGREEIVI.ENT DATE OF AGREEMENT: August 23 2001 NAME OF DEVELOPER: Shetler Construction Inc. (Hereinafter referred to as"DEVELOPW) SU"BDNISION NAME: 3-F Meadows This Agreement is made and entered into by and between the CITY OF ATASCADERO, a municipal corporation of the State of California (hereinafter referred to as "CITY") and DEVELOPER: RECITALS Pursuant to the provisions contained in the Atascadero Municipal Code,Title 9,Chapter 3, Section 9-3.656,certain,conditions of approval must be satisfied prior to City approval of a final parcel map of Lot Line Adjustment No. ATAL 00-192. This Agreement refers specifically to condition(iii)of Sub-Section C-3:"Engineering Division-Road Improvements—Offsite",the text of which is as follows: (iii) San Marcos Road between Los Altos Road and the project boundary shall be improved preparatory to acceptance of this portion of road into the City maintained system. Curve widening shall be constructed where curve radii is less than two hundred(200)feet. Curve widening shall be constricted in conformance with Section 4,Paragraph F of the City Standard Specifications,cations or as approved by the City Engineer.Improvement plans for the curve widening shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer prior to approval ojI the Master Development Plan. San Marcos Road between Los Altos Road and the project boundary shall be improved prior to the development of Phase 1 of the project and prior to the issuance of building permits. In accordance with the above conditions,and in consideration of the approval by the City ofa final parcel map of Lot Line Adjustment Na. ATAL 00-192;Developer and City do promise and agree with the other as follows: I. Developer shall complete off-site public improvements for the curve widening on San Marcos Road between Los Altos Road and the project boundary pursuant to the approved plans, entitled"OFFSITE R 1PROVEMENT PLANS FOR SAN MARCOS ROAD",and dated July 2001. 2. In addition to the above,the following repairs will be made to San Marcos Road between Los Altos Road and the project boundary,as shown on the attached Exhibit"A": - - SAN?,1ARC05 R.UIROVEMELTS ACV-DOC I_ 88 96/30/2006 09:52 FAX 8055430752 AMB Z003/010 a. Location I-Beginning at the water meter across from mailbox at 12070 San Marcos Road and ending south four hundred feet (400'). Kill weeds, clean, crack seal and pave depression 6'wide by 400' long(2400 ft.2 total). b. Location 2-Beginning across from driveway at 11855 San Marcos Road and ending south one hundred twenty five feet (125'). Clean,crack seal and pave depression 6' wide by 125' long(750 e total). C. Location 3-Beginning twenty-three feet(23')north ofPower Pole#4 on SanMarcos Road and ending north eighty five feet(850.Clean,crack seal and pave depression 4' wide by 85' long(340 ft total). d. Location 4-Beginning fourteen feet (14')north of power Pole# 4 on San Marcos Road and ending north ninety feet (90'). Clean, crack seal and pave depression 8' wide by 90'long(720 e total). e. Location 5-Beginning forty one feet(41') south of Power Pole#3 on San Marcos Road and ending south fifty feet(50').Clean,crack seal and pave depression 6'wide by 50'long(300 e total). 3. This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, executors,administrators,successors,and assigns of the respective parties to this Agreement. 4: This Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter. All modifications, amendments, or waivers of the terms of this Agreement must be in writing and signed by the appropriate representatives of the parties. In the case of CITY, the appropriate party shall be the Public Works Director. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,this Agreement is executed by CITY,by and through its Public Works Director. CITY: DEVELOPER: CITY OF ATASCADERO SHETLER CONSTRUCTION,INC. 1 By: f( Steve Kahn,Public Works Director Darren Shetler,President SA).?AAELCOS D4noVEMENTS AG&AOC 89 06/30/2006 09:53 FAX 8055430752 AMB 004/010 • ca j f N � ''••--yy�!• }Crrb� !!f o _ {!�4• .\ C � 1 t t� I 90 ATTACHMENT D o—_ o—_ ae� = ''��' � t [„�'r�•+......,^--•--. ,�,\\s\�1�1`.� �\ LOCATION A ROAD CONSTRUCTION Kf TRAFFIC SIGN X. ,eta,. ;`�,..F'� � t t� 1 ���`. i �t� `'r-^ a ,^•� •- i `�`'\ ROAD CONSTRUCTION ��,,.:•� l '��\J\ ti \ 1 TRAFFIC SIGN LOCA -:�..%-r "• i' ::4 r / "f ! ? LAD co AFFIL ON J` CASTLEROCK - TRAFFIC SGN 'fit 1 r tt' ` DENY BL� 7 'e_Hl fart F.s.MJ'• A—raa�.r=.0 a;.or .rouuv+ao v.:rx.oa,.e N0. SCOPE APPROX.SF rcc.w�v,u...;mre A DEMO,INSTALL 6'BASE 2.5'AC 250 B DEMO,INSTALL 6'BASE/2.5'AC 300 OAK RIDGE C DEMO,INSTALL 6"BASE 25-AC 50 0 DEMO,INSTALL 6'BASE/25'AC 330 ESTATES E DEMO,INSTALL 6'BASE/2.5"AC 300 F DEMO,INSTALL 6'BASE/2.5'AC 1 12w ATASCADERO, - G DEMO,INSTALL 6'BASE J 2.5'AC 510 CALIFORNIA H DEMO,INSTALL 6 BAS/2.5'AC 50 J DEMO.INSTALL 6'BASE/2.5'AC 1276 K DEMO,INSTALL 6'BASE/2.5'AC 300 L DEMO,INSTALL 6"BASE/2.5"AC 350 M DEMO,INSTALL 6'BASE/2.5'AC 350 N DEMO,INSTALL 6'BASE J 2.5'AC120 P DEMO,INSTALL 6'BASE J 2.5"AC 420 0 DEMO,INSTALL 6'BASE/2.5'AC 6.1,0 GENERAL NOTES: SAN MARCOS 1, ALL CONSTRUCTION WORK AND INSTALLATION SHALL CONFORM TO ROAD REPAIR THE CITY OF ATASCADERO STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN TWO-WAY TRAFFIC AT ALL - - IMES.TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE PnTH THE CURRENT CALTRANS MANUAL FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL AND WORK AREA T.RAFFiC CONTROL HANDBOOK. NO STREET CLOSURE SHALL BE PERMITTED UNLESS PREVIOSLY ARRANGED FOR AND GRANTED -By THE CITY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. UPON REQUEST,THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A TRAFFIC CONTROL AND DETOUR PLAN TO THE CITY ENGINEER FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO WORK, 3. TRAFFIC CONTROL MEASURES TO INCLUDE BUT NOT LIMITED TO LIGHTED BARRICADES AND TRAFFIC CONES. 4. ALL LOCATIONS INDICATE]ARE APPROXIMATE AND ARE NOT P.EPRES`cNTATIVE OF THE ACTUAL SIZE OF EACH R,-PAIR. �.,: .z - _ kTS - 1631-05 - mr 004-01 ..TT - �r7'AR2�.GhTi a,_eT 1 r_- 1