HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 05/09/2006•
�11t� 1 0 - ❑ Wl lI�/,
l�l� l Idl I1�oil CITY OF - I
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
Tuesday, May 9, 2006
7:00 P.M.
City Hall
Council Chambers
6907 EI Camino.Real
Atascadero, California
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: 6:30 P.M.
CLOSED SESSION:
(Immediately Following Redevelopment Agency Meeting)
1. PUBLIC COMMENT - CLOSED SESSION
2. CALL TO ORDER
a. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
(Government Code Section 54957)
Title: CITY ATTORNEY
3. ADJOURN
4. CLOSED SESSION REPORT
REGULAR SESSION: 7:00 P.M.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Council Member Luna
ROLL CALL: Mayor O'Malley
Mayor Pro Tem Pacas
Council Member Clay
Council Member Luna
Council Member Scalise
COMMUNITY FORUM: (This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wanting to
address the Council on any matter not on this agenda and over which the Council has
jurisdiction. Speakers are limited to five minutes. Please state your name for the record
before making your presentation. The Council may take action to direct the staff to
place a matter of business on a future agenda. A maximum of 30 minutes will be
allowed for Community Forum, unless changed by the Council.)
APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Roll Call
COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS: (On their own initiative, Council
Members may make a brief announcement or a brief report on their own activities.
Council Members may ask a question for clarification, make a referral to staff or take
action to have staff place a matter of business on a future agenda. The Council may
take action on items listed on the Agenda.)
PRESENTATIONS:
1. Proclamation declaring May 15 — 21, 2006 "National Police Week" and
May 15, 2006 as "Police Memorial Day."
2. Proclamation declaring May 2006 as "Bike Month" and May 15 — 19,
2006 as "Bike to Work Week."
•
A. CONSENT CALENDAR: (All items on the consent calendar are considered to
be routine and non -controversial by City staff and will be approved by one motion
if no member of the Council or public wishes to comment or ask questions. If
comment or discussion is desired by anyone, the item will be removed from the
consent calendar and will be considered in the listed sequence with an
opportunity for any member of the public to address the Council concerning the
item before action is taken.)
1. City Council Meeting Minutes — April 11, 2006
■ City Clerk Recommendation: Council approve the City Council meeting
minutes of April 11, 2006. [City Clerk]
2. March 2006 Accounts Payable and Payroll
■ Fiscal Impact: $2,302,848.23.
■ Recommendation: Council approve certified City accounts payable,
payroll and payroll vendor checks for March 2006. [Administrative
Services]
3. March 2006 Investment Report
■ Fiscal Impact: None.
■ Recommendation: Council approve the Investment Report for March
2006. [City Treasurer] 0
2
4. Interchange Operational Improvement Studv / Consultant Services
Contract
■ Fiscal Impact: $167,960 ($120,000 from the 2005/2007 Capital Budget
and $50,000 from the Regional State Highway Account Funds).
■ Recommendation: Council authorize the City Manager to execute an
agreement with Whitlock & Weinberger Transportation, Inc. known as, W -
Trans, for an Interchange Operational Improvement Study. [Public Works]
5. Temporary Road Closure / Del Rio and Obispo Roads
■ Fiscal Impact: None.
■ Recommendation: Council approve the request from Dave Spurr
Excavating for the temporary closure of portions of Del Rio Road and a
partial closure of Obispo Road. [Public Works]
6. Temporary Road Closure / Palma Avenue
■ Fiscal Impact. $160.00 for the installation of Road Closed signs by Public
Works Staff.
■ Recommendation: Council approve the closure of Palma Avenue from
East Mall to West Mall during the Father's House organization event in the
Sunken Gardens on June 3, 2006, from 11:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. [Public
Works]
B. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. Appeal 2006-0008 of Front Yard Fence Height Variance 2005-0009 (9186
Palomar Avenue)
■ Description: Appeal of Planning Commission approval of a variance
allowing a recently constructed six-foot high solid wood fence to remain
within the front yard setback within a single-family residential
neighborhood.
■ Disclosure of Ex Parte Communications
■ Fiscal Impact: None.
■ Recommendation: Council adopt Draft Resolution A granting Appeal
2006-0008 (denying Variance 2005-0009) based on findings. [Community
Development]
2. Interim Urgency Ordinance Establishina a Moratorium on Conversion of
Residential Units to Condominiums
■ Description: Temporary Ordinance establishing a moratorium on
conversion of residential units to condominiums.
■ Fiscal Impact: None.
■ Recommendation: Council adopt the Interim Urgency Ordinance
establishing a moratorium on conversions of residential units to
condominiums. This action extends the moratorium for 10 months and 15
days. [City Attorney]
3
C.
El
3. Weed/Refuse Abatement Program
■ Fiscal Impact: The City recovers costs for administering this program
through the 150% administrative fee, which is placed on the San Luis
Obispo County Special Tax Assessment for the fiscal year 2006-2007 Tax
Roll.
■ Recommendation: Council adopt the Draft Resolution, declaring
vegetative growth and/or refuse a public nuisance, commencing
proceedings for the abatement of said nuisances, and placing all
abatement fees on the San Luis Obispo County Special Tax Assessment
for the Fiscal Year 2006-2007 Tax Roll. [Fire]
4. Downtown Parking & Business Improvement Area (FY 2006-2007)
Confirmation of Annual Assessment
■ Fiscal Impact: Revenue of approximately $10,500 for Fiscal Year 2006-
2007.
■ Recommendation: Council adopt the Draft Resolution confirming the
annual assessment for Downtown Parking & Business Improvement Area
(Fiscal Year 2006-2007). [City Manager]
MANAGEMENT REPORTS:
1. Signage Task Force Report
■ Fiscal Impact: None.
■ Recommendations: Council:
1. Direct staff to update the City Sign Ordinance to incorporate the
Signage Task Force's recommended changes; and,
2. Direct staff to work with the Chamber of Commerce and Main Street
Association on a signage clean-up information campaign while the
ordinance update is in process. [Community Development]
2. Cardroom Ordinance / Request for Expansion of Tables (Outlaws Card
Parlour
■ Description: Request from the owner of Outlaws Card Parlour to increase
the number of card tables from two (2) to five (5).
■ Fiscal Impact: If the City Council amended the Municipal Code to allow
additional card tables, the City would receive a one time revenue of $300
per additional table.
■ Recommendation: Council give staff direction on how to proceed on this
request. [City Manager]
3. Hwy 101/41 Interchange Value Analysis Study
■ Fiscal Impact: None.
■ Recommendation: Council receive a verbal report from Caltrans on the
results of the Hwy 101/41 Interchange Value Analysis Study and
recommend they proceed to further explore two options and report back
on May 23rd. [Public Works]
•
•
9
J
D. COMMITTEE & LIAISON REPORTS: (The following represent standing
committees. Informative status reports will be given, as felt necessary):
Mayor O'Malley
1. County Mayor's Round Table
2. Finance Committee
3. Air Pollution Control District (APCD)
4. Economic Vitality Corporation, Board of Directors (EVC)
5. League of California Cities — Grassroots Network
6. City / Schools Committee
7. Economic Opportunity Commission (EOC)
8. SLO Council of Governments (SLOCOG) / S.L.O. Regional Transit Authority
(SLORTA)
Mayor Pro Tem Pacas
1. Integrated Waste Management Authority (IWMA)
2. City / Schools Committee
3. Atascadero Youth Task Force
Council Member Clay
1. S.L.O. County Flood Control & Water Conservation District Water Resources
Advisory Committee
2. Nacimiento Water Purveyors Contract Technical Advisory Group
3. North County Water Purveyors Group
Council Member Luna
1. Finance Committee
Council Member Scalise
1. Atascadero State Hospital Advisory Board
2. Local Agency Formation Commissions (LAFCO)
E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION:
1.
City Council
2.
City Clerk
3.
City Treasurer
4.
City Attorney
5.
City Manager
•
5
F. ADJOURNMENT:
Please note: Should anyone challenge any proposed development entitlement listed on this Agenda in court, that
person may be limited to raising those issues addressed at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written
correspondence delivered to the City Council at or prior to this public hearing. Correspondence submitted at this
public hearing will be distributed to the Council and available for review in the City Clerk's office.
I, Shannon Sims, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Atascadero, declare under the penalty of perjury
that the foregoing agenda for the May 9, 2006 Regular Session of the Atascadero City Council was
posted on May 2, 2006 at the Atascadero City Hall, 6907 EI Camino Real, Atascadero, CA 93422
and was available for public review in the Customer Service Center at that location.
Signed this 2nd day of May, 2006 at Atascadero, California.
Shannon Sims, Deputy City Clerk
City of Atascadero
•
0
City of Atascadero
WELCOME TO THE ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Oe City Council meets in regular session on the second and fourth. Tuesday of each month at 7:00 p.m., at the City Hall
Council Chambers, 6907 EI Camino Real, Atascadero. Matters are considered by the Council in the order of the printed
Agenda.
Copies of the staff reports or other documentation relating to each item of business referred to on the Agenda are on file
in the office of the City Clerk and are available for public inspection during City Hall business hours at the Central
Receptionist counter and on our website, www.atascadero.org. An agenda packet is also available for public review at
the Atascadero Library, 6850 Morro Road. Contracts, Resolutions and Ordinances will be allocated a number once they
are approved by the City Council. The minutes of this meeting will reflect these numbers. All documents submitted by the
public during Council meetings that are either read into the record or referred to in their statement will be noted in the
minutes and available for review in the City Clerk's office.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in a City meeting
or other services offered by this City, please contact the City Manager's Office or the City Clerk's Office, both at (805)
470-3400. Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time when services are needed will assist the City staff in
assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting or service.
TO SPEAK ON AGENDA ITEMS
Members of the audience may speak on any item on the agenda. The Mayor will identify the subject, staff will give their
report, and the Council will ask questions of staff. The Mayor will announce when the public comment period is open and
will request anyone interested to address the Council regarding the matter being considered to step up to the podium. If
you wish to speak for, against or comment in any way:
• You must approach the podium and be recognized by the Mayor
• Give your name and address (not required)
• Make your statement
• All comments should be made to the Mayor and Council
• No person shall be permitted to make slanderous, profane or negative personal remarks concerning any other
individual, absent or present
• All comments limited to 5 minutes (unless changed by the Council)
• No one may speak for a second time until everyone wishing to speak has had an opportunity to do so, and no
one may speak more than twice on any item.
If you wish to use a computer presentation to support your comments, you must notify the City Clerk's office at least 24
hours prior to the meeting. Access to hook up your laptop to the City's projector will be provided. You are required to
submit to the City Clerk a printed copy of your presentation for the record. Please check in with the City Clerk before the
meeting begins to announce your presence and turn in the printed copy.
The Mayor will announce when the public comment period is closed, and thereafter, no further public comments will be
heard by the Council
TO SPEAK ON SUBJECTS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA
Under Agenda item, "COMMUNITY FORUM", the Mayor will call for anyone from the audience having business with the
Council to:
• Please approach the podium and be recognized
• Give your name and address (not required)
• State the nature of your business
This is the time items not on the Agenda may be brought to the Council's attention. A maximum of 30 minutes will be
allowed for Community Forum (unless changed by the Council).
TO HAVE ITEMS PLACED ON AGENDA
II business matters to appear on the Agenda must be in the Office of the City Manager 14 days preceding the Council
eeting. Should you have a matter you wish to bring before the Council, please mail or bring a written communication to
the City Manager's office in City Hall prior to the deadline.
7
1 10
1\
WIN
City of Atascadero
- Proclamation
May 2006 "Bike Month
May 15 — 19, 2006r "Bike To Work Week"
WHEREAS, bicycle commuting is an effective means to reduce air pollution and
conserve energy and promotes the "livability" of communities by reducing traffic, noise and
congestion; and
WHEREAS, many businesses, organizations and schools have made efforts to help
customers, students and employees commute by bicycle, including installation of bicycle parking
and other commute facilities; and
WHEREAS, bicycle transportation is an integral part of the it
transportation systems planned by federal, state, regional, and local transportation agencies;
and
WHEREAS, bike month is a San Luis Obispo County -wide celebration of human
powered transportation which encourages people of all .ages and abilities to ride bicycles to
their destinations;' and
WHEREAS, bike month promotions such as "Bike -to -Work and School Week
"Commuter Bike Challenge", "Executive Commuter Bike Challenge" and "Bike Fest 2006
successfully encourages citizens to ride their bicycles, thereby: reducing vehicular emissions in
the county; and
WHEREAS, "Bikes in Bloom" is the theme for 2006, an appropriate notion as this area
is in bloom with .cycling groups who are working together and individually to support bicycling
in all of its forms in San Luis Obispo Couizty; and
W1 EREAS, `Businesses are encouraged to take part in the "Bike Alt Display" by
decorating their company's window in the "Bikes in Bloom the
May. me throughout them month of
NOW, THEREFORE, RE IT RESOLVED that I, Toni O'Malley, Mayor of the City of
Atascadero, on behalf of the City Council, do hereby officially proclaim May 2006 as "Bike
Month " and May 15 -19, 2006 as "Bike to Work Week
WITNESS THE OFFICIAL SEAL OF
THE CITY OF ATASCADERO:
J 0
Tom O'Malley, Mayor
City of Atascadero, California
May 9, 2006
I
im
i
City of Atascadero
Proclamation
NATIONAL POLICE WEEK, MAY 15 - MAY 21, 2006
POLICE MEMORIAL DA Y. MA Y 15, 2006
WHEREAS, Police Memorial Day was first established by Presidential Proclamation in
1960 to commemorate all law enforcement officers who had given their life in the line of duty;
and
WHEREAS, since 1960, Police Memorial Day has been observed on May 15'h and the
week in which Police Memorial Day falls has ;been proclaimed as "National Police Week";
and
WHEREAS, law enforcement officers willingly perform :hazardous duty to protect and
defend their community; and
WHEREAS, the people of our Nation and State should commemorate those officers who
have given their lives while providing service and protection to their community.
NOW,, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that I, Tom O'Malley, Mayor of the City of
Atascadero, on beha f of the City Council, do hereby officially proclaim:
MAY I5, 2006 AS"NATIONAL PEACE OFFICERS MEMORIAL DAY"
and
MAY 15=21, 200b AS "NATIONAL POLICE WEEK"
in Atascadero and call upon all citizens and lawenforcement agencies to pay tribute to those
who have given the ultimate sacrifice while protecting their community.
WITNESS THE OFFICIAL SEAL OF
THE CITY OF A TASCADERO:,
Tom O'Malley, Mayor
City of Atascadero, CA
May 9, 2006
E
u
ITEM NUMBER: A-1
DATE: 05/09/06
CITY OF A TA SCA DERO
CITY COUNCIL
DRAFT MINUTES
Tuesday, April 11, 2006
7:00 P.M.
CLOSED SESSION: 6:33 p.m.
(Immediately Following Redevelopment Agency Meeting)
1. PUBLIC COMMENT - CLOSED SESSION None
2. CALL TO ORDER
a) CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR
(Government Code Section 54956.8)
Property: Paloma Park
Agency Negotiator: City Manager and/or Assistant City Manager
Negotiating Parties: State of California
Under negotiation: Instruction to negotiator will concern price and
terms of payment.
3. ADJOURN: 6:50 p.m.
4. CLOSED SESSION REPORT
City Attorney Patrick Enright announced that the City Council met in closed session and
no reportable action was taken.
REGULAR SESSION: 7:00 P.M.
Mayor O'Malley called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. and Council Member Clay led
the Pledge of Allegiance.
CC Draft Minutes 04/11/06
Page 1 of 11
12
ROLL CALL:
Present.. Council Members lay, Luna Scalise and Mayor O'Malley
Absent: Mayor Pro Tem Pacas
Others Present: City Clerk / Assistant to City Manager Marcia McClure Torgerson
and Deputy City Clerk Grace Pucci
Staff Present: City Manager Wade McKinney, Assistant City Manager Jim Lewis,
Administrative Services Director Rachelle Rickard, Community
Development Director Warren Frace, Community Services Director
Brady Cherry, Public Works Director Steve Kahn, Fire Chief Kurt
Stone, Police Chief John Couch, Public Works Administrative
Assistant Valerie Humphrey and City Attorney Patrick Enright.
COMMUNITY FORUM:
Pastor Johnny Johnson, Paradise Fellowship Ministries, led those present in prayer.
James Corey thanked the Mayor for the letter sent to the residents of his neighborhood
regarding the new railroad spur and asked that the city work with the local businesses
who will be using the spur as well as with Union Pacific Railroad.
Ann Ketcherside asked Council to give direction for staff to work with her regarding the
zoning on a specific property in Atascadero.
Kate Montgomery read from a letter she sent to the newspaper regarding the removal of
landscaping along the freeway especially at the intersection of Highways 101 and 41.
Joan O'Keefe expressed concern regarding the amount of mature vegetation that will be
destroyed through the widening of the 101/41 interchange, and questioned whether the
construction of the overpass requires the removal of all vegetation or if some can be
saved.
Marge Mackay spoke about the removal of trees at the Highway 101/41 interchange
and asked Council to retain as many trees as possible.
Mayor O'Malley announced that he has asked staff to report back on this issue, and that
he would keep the community informed.
Eric Greening spoke in support of the previous speakers and of the need to focus on
saving every tree possible by downsizing the project where trees exist. He also spoke
in support of those who came to address the climate change issue.
go
CC Draft Minutes 04/11/06
Page 2 of 11
13
Daphne Fahsing stated she had looked at the Cal Trans report and does not believe
• they want to see the city remove so many trees at the 101/41 interchange, and that
doing so will not present a pleasing view.
Maria Hooper encouraged Council to be certain that Cal Trans removes as little
vegetation as possible and to replace landscaping where needed.
Council Member Luna indicated that if there are safety issues at the 101/41 interchange
they should be brought before the Council He stated it is inappropriate to take out trees
to get a better view of the downtown and out of character with the city's protection of
trees.
Council Member Scalise explained that the Aesthetics Committee met three years ago
when this project first came on line, and they put in place a large budget for vegetation
replacement. She is confident that tree removals will be minimal.
Council Member Clay commented that Cal Trans should save as many trees as
possible without sacrificing safety.
Mitch Paskin expressed his concerns about the condition of San Marcos Road, and
stated that he is waiting for an answer on whether the city it will accept San Marcos
Road into the city maintained system.
Jono Kincaid explained why he would like Atascadero to be the next City to sign on to
U.S. Mayors Climate Protection Agreement.
There was Councif consensus to continue with the Community Forum.
Brandon Istenes spoke in favor of Atascadero signing on to the U.S. Mayors Climate
Protection Agreement.
Jordan Elkins, Vice President Atascadero High School Earth Club, asked Mayor
O'Malley to sign the U.S. Mayors Climate Protection Agreement and spoke about
another community who has benefited from doing this.
Brenda Cherry, Atascadero High School student, spoke in favor of Mayor O'Malley
signing on to the U.S. Mayors Climate Protection Agreement.
Natasha Meyers Cherry, President Atascadero High School Earth Club, spoke in
support of Mayor O'Malley signing the U.S. Mayors Climate Protection Agreement and
gave an example of a community where this program was used successfully.
Mayor O'Malley asked staff to report back in two months on this issue.
Joanne Main distributed a progress report for the Chamber of Commerce and reported
on some of their activities benefiting the community.
CC Draft Minutes 04/11/06
Page 3 of 11
14
Mayor O'Malley closed the Community Forum period.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA:
MOTION: By Council Member Luna and seconded by Council Member
Scalise to approve the agenda.
Motion passed 4:0 by a roll -call vote.
COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS:
Mayor O'Malley stated he was pleased to see the report in the Tribune on the Council's
activities, spoke about the progress being made for the Farmer's Market, and
commended staff's proactive approach to road failures in the community.
PRESENTATIONS:
1. Proclamation Declaring April 9 - 15, 2006 as "National Public Safety
Telecommunicator's Week."
Council Member Scalise read the proclamation and presented it to Ryan Infantino, Ann
Banks and Candy Flohaug, public safety dispatchers. Police Chief Couch spoke about
the role of public safety dispatchers in the community.
2. Proclamation Declaring April 23 — 29, 2006 "National Volunteer Week."
Council Member Scalise read the proclamation and presented it to Police Chief John
Couch who asked the volunteers to stand and be recognized and spoke about their
contributions to the community.
3. Proclamation Declaring April 22, 2006 as "Earth Day."
Council Member Luna read the proclamation and presented it to the President of
Atascadero High School Earth Club, Natasha Meyer Cherry, and to Jordon Elkin, Earth
Club Vice President.
4. Proclamation Declaring April 2006 the "Month of the Child" and "Child
Abuse Prevention Month."
Mayor O'Malley read the proclamation and presented it to Theresa Sheppard, Director
ASH Building Blocks Child Development Center. Ms. Sheppard thanked the City for the
proclamation and had several children from the center distribute items they had made in
their classrooms to the Council.
CC Draft Minutes 04/11/06
Page 4of11
15
0 A. CONSENT CALENDAR:
•
1. City Council Meeting Minutes — March 14, 2006
■ City Clerk Recommendation: Council approve the City Council meeting
minutes of March 14, 2006. [City Clerk]
2. February 2006 Accounts Payable and Payroll
■ Fiscal Impact: $1,981,530.70.
■ Recommendation: Council approve certified City accounts payable,
payroll and payroll vendor checks for February 2006. [Administrative
Services]
3. February 2006 Investment Report
■ Fiscal Impact: None.
■ Recommendation: Council approve the Investment Report for February
2006. [City Treasurer]
4. Final Map 2005-0118 (Parcel Map AT 04-0130) West Front (TPM 2004-
0060) (Linda Lee Kenyon)
■ Description: Approval of the division of one lot of 3.02 acres gross into
three lots of 1.00 acre gross each.
■ Fiscal Impact: None.
■ Recommendations: Council:
1. Accept Final Parcel Map 2005-0118 (Parcel Map AT 04-0130); and,
2. Reject, without prejudice to future acceptance, the offer of dedication
for Public Utility Easement. [Public Works]
5. Street Closure Request / Porsche Show `n Shine
• Fiscal Impact: Approximately two hours of un -allocated staff time for
Public Works Maintenance Workers.
■ Recommendation: Council approve a request by Atascadero Main Street
to close portions of East Mall and Palma Avenue on Saturday, August 26,
2006 for the Porsche Show `n Shine event. [Public Works]
6. Street Closure Request / Sunken Gardens Flea Market
■ Fiscallmpact: None.
■ Recommendation: Council approve a request by the Community Services
Department to close a portion Palma Avenue on Saturday, April 15, 2006
for the Sunken Gardens Flea Market. [Community Services]
CC Draft Minutes 04/11/06
Page 5 of 11
16
7. Affordable Housing Program
■ Fiscal Impact: None.
■ Recommendation: Council adopt Draft Resolution authorizing the City
Manager to execute documents for the City's Affordable Housing
Program. [City Attorney]
Items pulled: Council Member Luna, Item #A-7
MOTION: By Council Member Clay and seconded by Council Member
Luna to approve Items #A-1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6.
Motion passed 4:0 by a roll -call vote.
Item #A-7: Council Member Luna stated he believes the buck stops with the Council
for affordable housing and it is appropriate oversight for the Mayor to do this signing.
For this reason he cannot support delegation of this authority.
MOTION: By Council Member Scalise and seconded by Council Member
Clay to approve Item #A-7.
Motion passed 3:1 by a roll -call vote, (Luna opposed)
(Resolution No. 2006-021)
B. PUBLIC HEARING:
1. Atascadero Creek Corridor Enhancement Project
■ Description: Request direction on enhancement project including
proposed agreement with the State and a Public Hearing.
■ Fiscal Impact: Annual trail maintenance on the trail project is projected to
be approximately $30,000-$60,000 annually. There are currently no funds
budgeted for this maintenance.
■ Recommendations: Council:
1. Review and comment on the Creek project report, and provide direction
as necessary; and,
2. Authorize the City Manager to execute the letter of agreement with the
State; and,
3. Authorize the Parks and Recreation Commission to conduct a public
hearing on the environmental document. [Community Services]
Community Services Director Brady Cherry gave the staff report and answered
questions of Council.
D.J. Funk, Executive aDirector, Resource Conservation District, answered questions of
Council.
CC Draft Minutes 04/11/06
Page 6 of 11
17
•
•
•
0 PUBLIC COMMENT
Kathy Hustace, North County representative to San Luis Obispo County Trails Advisory
Committee, explained why they highly recommend Atascadero go forward with the
project.
Eric Greening stated his agreement with leaving the San Gabriel area as it is, and
asked several questions relating to the EIR.
Ron Bergdorf stated his concern about how much narrower this path will make
Ensenada and the safety on the street given the increased pedestrian traffic.
Jonalee Istenes stated that one property owner should not be allowed to stop the public
right of way, and shared several of her concerns with the trail proposal.
Joe Montoya expressed concern regarding the costs to maintain the trail.
Bill Obermeyer, Atascadero Horseman, asked the Council to consider this as a multi
use trail, and indicated there would be many volunteers to help with maintenance.
David Ryan stated he was pleased that the trail stops at San Gabriel, spoke about trail
maintenance and restoration, and was supportive of keeping the trail near the
downtown.
Ellen Beraud expressed her support for the proposal, and stated she had found six
policies in the General Plan that support this project.
John Shadack stated he lives along the trail area and expressed concern that proposed
work would change the direction of the stream and destabilize the banks in the area.
D.J. Funk addressed issues raised during Public Comment.
Mayor O'Malley closed the Public Comment period.
MOTION: 6y Council Member Luna and seconded by Council Member
Scalise to authorize the City Manager to execute the letter of
agreement with the State; and, authorize the Parks and
Recreation Commission to conduct a public hearing on the
environmental document.
Motion passed 4:0 by a roll -call vote. (Agreement No. 2006-
021)
•
CC Draft Minutes 04/11/06
Paige 7 of 11
18
2. Consideration of Ordinance to Amend the Zoning Code to Permit (with a
Conditional Use Permit) Medical Marijuana Dispensaries in Certain
Commercial Zones
■ Fiscal Impact: None.
■ Recommendations: Planning Commission Recommends: Council:
1. Adopt Draft Resolution A certifying Proposed Negative Declaration
2006-0004; and
2. Introduce for first reading by title only, Draft Ordinance A approving
Zone Code Text Amendment permitting medical marijuana
dispensaries in the CS Zone subject to a conditional use permit. [City
Attorney]
City Attorney Patrick Enright and Police Chief John Couch gave the staff report and
answered questions of Council.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Charles Lynch, Central Coast Compassionate Care, thanked Council for considering
this issue, and spoke about his facility in Morro Bay and its acceptance by the City
Council there. He suggested allowing this use in the Commercial Retail and Industrial
Park Zones as well as Commercial Services. Mr. Lynch answered questions of Council.
Kent Canella stated that Council is doing what is necessary for the community and
asked them to reconsider allowing this only in the Commercial Service Zone, which is
too restrictive, and to increase the number of facilities allowed.
Mike (last name not given) commended Council for considering this ordinance and
spoke about the establishment of dispensaries and the regulatory body that should
handle this use. He submitted several documents for the record. (Exhibit A)
Joanne Main stated this use should be limited to the Commercial Service Zone because
no sales tax will be accrued with this use and it is important to protect retail zones.
Charles Lynch stated he had proposed a licensing fee for allowing dispensaries in the
city, and that this use brings people to the city to use the facility, potentially generating
sales tax income.
Mayor O'Malley closed the Public Comment period.
Council Member Scalise stated she does not want to see this in Atascadero, and that
there are other ways for patients to get the medication they need. However, if it is
approved it must be as limited as possible and with the use of the CUP process.
MOTION: By Council Member Luna and seconded by Mayor O'Malley to
adopt Draft Resolution A certifying Proposed Negative
Declaration 2006-0004; and introduce for first reading by.title
CC Draft Minutes 04/11/06
Page 8 of 11
19
only, Draft Ordinance A approving Zone Code Text
Amendment permitting medical marijuana dispensaries in the
CS Zone subject to a conditional use permit, and with a limit of
250 patients and the hours of operation to be 8:00 to 5:00.
Motion passed 3:1 by a roll -call vote. (Scalise opposed)
(Resolution No. 2006-022)
Mayor O'Malley recessed the hearing at 10.30 p.m.
Mayor O'Malley called the meeting back to order at 10:37 p.m.
C. MANAGEMENT REPORTS:
1. Sunken Gardens Fountain / Anti -Grind Devices
■ Description: Approval of anti -grind devices to protect the Sunken Gardens
Fountain from skateboarding damage.
■ Fiscal Impact: $2,000 from budgeted maintenance funds.
■ Recommendation: Council approve the purchase and installation of
decorative anti -grind devices for the Sunken Gardens fountain. [Public
Works]
Public Works Administrative Assistant Valerie Humphrey gave the staff report and
answered questions of Council.
Council Member Luna stated he could not support this item because he believes there
shouldn't be any skateboarding in Sunken Gardens at all as the city has provided a
skateboard park.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Eric Greening expressed support for the staff recommendation.
Mayor O'Malley closed the Public Comment period.
MOTION: By Council Member Scalise and seconded by Council Member
Clay to approve the purchase and installation of decorative
anti -grind devices for the Sunken Gardens fountain.
Motion passed 3:1 by a roll -call vote. (Luna opposed)
2. Atascadero Short Range Transit Pian
■ Description: Request approval of the 5 year Short Range Transit Plan.
■ Fiscal Impact: With the proposed changes, annual operating costs are
expected to increase by $25,000 in Fiscal Year 2006-2007. Funding for
CC Draft Minutes 04/11/06
Page 9 of 11
20
the remainder of the Plan period will be requested in the appropriate future
budget cycle.
■ Recommendation: Council adopt the Atascadero Short Range Transit
Plan and direct staff to implement the Service, Capital, Institutional and
Financial Recommendations outlined in the Plan. [Public Works]
Public Works Director Steve Kahn, Public Works Administrative Assistant Valerie
Humphrey and Administrative Services Director Rachelle Rickard gave the staff report
and answered questions of Council. (Exhibit B)
PUBLIC COMMENT
Eric Greening disagreed with Service Recommendation #3, suggested ways to
eliminate redundancy and spoke against establishing a transit center in the downtown.
MOTION: By Council Member Clay and seconded by Council Member
Scalise to go past 11:00 p.m.
Motion passed 3:1 by a roll call vote. (Luna opposed)
Mike Anderson, shuffle bus driver, spoke about problems with the RTA schedule, and
suggested establishing five or six express stops for the RTA.
Mayor O'Malley closed the Public Comment period.
MOTION: B Council Member Scalise and seconded b Council Member
Y Y
Clay to adopt the Atascadero Short Range Transit Plan and
direct staff to implement the Service, Capital, Institutional and
Financial Recommendations outlined in the Plan.
Motion passed 4:0 by a roll -call vote.
3. Lewis Avenue Bridge
■ Fiscal Impact: Approval of the change order will result in the expenditure
of $19,000 of budgeted funds. Approval of the disbursement to the
Atascadero Unified School District will result in the expenditure of
$115,000 of budgeted funds.
■ Recommendations: Council:
1. Authorize the City Manager to sign Contract Change Order No. 3 for
$19,000.00 and other future change orders with Psomas for design
modifications needed on the Lewis Avenue Bridge
2. Authorize the City Manager to enter into an $115,000.00 agreement
with the Atascadero Unified School District for mitigation of bus
impacts. [Public Works]
Public Works Director Steve Kahn gave the staff report and answered questions of
Council.
CC Draft Minutes 04/11/06
Page 10 of 11
21
PUBLIC COMMENT — None
MOTION: By Council Member Scalise and seconded by Council Member
Clay to authorize the City Manager to sign Contract Change
Order No. 3 for $19,000.00 and any expenditures in the future
above $5,000 to come back to the Council for the Lewis
Avenue Bridge; and to authorize the City Manager to enter into
an $115,000.00 agreement with the Atascadero Unified School
District for mitigation on the bus stop.
Motion passed 4:0 by a roll -call vote. (Agreement No 2006-
022)
D. COMMITTEE & LIAISON REPORTS:
Council Member Clay
1. School Committee: Will be going tomorrow to the San Benito School to look
at possibilities for fields.
E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION:
1 None
F. ADJOURNMENT:
Mayor O'Malley adjourned the meeting at 11:11 p.m. to the Public Financing Authority
Meeting.
MINUTES PREPARED BY:
Grace Pucci, Deputy City Clerk
The following exhibit is available for review in the City Clerk's Office:
Exhibit A — Mike, Documents regarding Dispensing of Medical Marijuana
Exhibit B — Short Range Transit Plan
CC Draft Minutes 04/11/06
Page 11 of 11.
22
ITEM NUMBER:
A - 2
DATE: -05/09/06
1919 1 1979--
Atascadero City Council
Staff Report - Administrative Services Department
March 2006 Accounts Payable and Payroll
RECOMMENDATION:
Council approve certified City accounts payable, payroll and payroll vendor checks for
March 2006.
DISCUSSION:
Attached for City Council review and approval are the following:
Payroll
Dated 3/9/06 Checks # 22444 - 22498 $
56,882.11
Direct Deposits
168,561.07
Dated 3/23/06 Checks # 22499 - 22552
48,902.95
174,679.26
Direct Deposits
Accounts Payable
Dated 3/1/06 - 3/31/06
Checks # 104234 - 104832
& EFTs 405 - 416
1,853,822.84
TOTAL AMOUNT $.
2,302,848.23
FISCAL IMPACT:
Total expenditures for all funds is $
2,302,848.23
CERTIFICATION:
The undersigned certifies that the attached demands have been released for pay ent
and that funds are available for these demand
2�/M,4
Rachelle Rickard, Dir for of Administrative Services
ATTACHMENT:
March 2006 Eden Warrant Register in the amount of $
1,853,822.84
24
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of March 2006
Check
Number
Check
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount
104234
03/03/2006
10-8 RETROFIT
Accounts Payable Check
307.50
104235
03/03/2006
A & T ARBORISTS
Accounts Payable Check
175.00
104236
03/03/2006
A -JAY EXCAVATING, INC.
Accounts Payable Check
13,761.00
104237
03/03/2006
A.J. DIANI CONSTRUCTION CO,INC
Accounts Payable Check
65,152.04
104238
03/03/2006
KEITH AGGSON
Accounts Payable Check
10.00
104239
03/03/2006
AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT
Accounts Payable Check
1,107.23
104240
03/03/2006
AMERICAN'MARBORG
Accounts Payable Check
42.19
104241
03/03/2006
AMERICAN WEST TIRE & AUTO INC
Accounts Payable Check
67.32
104242
03/03/2006
API, ATLAS PERFORMANCE INDUST
Accounts Payable Check
-.905.00
104243
03/03/2006
AQUAMARK POOL CARE
Accounts Payable Check
227.98
104244
03/03/2006
ARAMARK
Accounts Payable Check
1,128.55
104245
03/03/2006
ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
Accounts Payable Check
308.88
104246
03/03/2006,
GINA ARIAS
Accounts Payable Check
50.30
104247
03/03/2006
AT&T
Accounts Payable Check
43.15
104248
03/03/2006
ATASCADERO FORD
Accounts Payable Check
5,144.37
104249
03/03/2006
ATASCADERO GLASS, INC.
Accounts Payable Check
3,022.00
104250
03/03/2006
ATASCADERO LOAVES & FISHES
Accounts Payable Check
5,000.00
104252
03/03/2006
ATASCADERO MUTUAL WATER CO.
Accounts Payable Check
3,135.40
104253
03/03/2006
ATASCADERO NEWS
Accounts Payable Check
1,932.37
104254
03/03/2006
ATASCADERO UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST
Accounts Payable Check
697.50
104255
03/03/2006
WILLIAM AUSMAN
Accounts Payable Check
150.00
104256
03/03/2006
AVAYA INC.
Accounts Payable Check
22.42
104257
03/03/2006
TIFFANY AYLES
Accounts Payable Check
80.00
104258
03/03/2006
ANN BANKS
Accounts Payable Check
34.71
104259
03/03/2006
SHERRY BAZZELL
Accounts Payable Check
54.50
104260
03/03/2006
AMY M. BEEMAN
Accounts Payable Check
345.80
104261
03/03/2006
CINDY K. BENSON
Accounts Payable Check
449.75
104262
03/03/2006
BILLY NIX SEAL COATING & PAVNG
Accounts Payable Check
2,200.00
104263
03/03/2006
TOM BIRKENFELD
Accounts Payable Check
10.00
104264
03/03/2006
JEFF BRAZZI
Accounts Payable Check
100.00
104265
03/03/2006
BRENDLER JANITORIAL SERVICE
Accounts Payable Check
505.00
104266
03/03/2006
CASEY BRYSON
Accounts Payable Check
70.00
104267
03/03/2006
CA. CENTRAL FIRE PROTECTION
Accounts Payable Check
13,479.37
104268
03/03/2006
CAD -SCAN CONNECTION
Accounts Payable Check
149.96
104269
03/03/2006
CAL -COAST REFRIGERATION, INC
Accounts Payable Check
543.20
25
Check
umber
104270
104271
104272
104273
104274
104275
104276
104277
104278
104279
104280
104281
104282
104283
104284
104285
104286
104287
104288
104289
104290
104291
104292
104293
104294
104295
104296
104297
104298
104299
104300
104301
104302
104303
• 104304
104305
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of March 2006
Check
Date Vendor
03/03/2006
CELLULAR ONE
03/03/2006
CENTRAL COAST WATER TREATMENT
03/03/2006
CES SANTA MARIA
03/03/2006
CES SANTA MARIA
03/03/2006
CHICAGO GRADE LANDFILL
03/03/2006
CINGULAR WIRELESS
03/03/2006
KATHY J. CINOWALT
03/03/2006
CLEAN WATER SYSTEMS, INC.
03/03/2006
COAST ELECTRONICS
03/03/2006
COASTAL IMAGING SUPPLIES
03/03/2006
COASTLINE EQUIPMENT
03/03/2006
CREATIVE PIPE, INC.
03/03/2006
CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER
03/03/2006
DECOU LUMBER COMPANY
03/03/2006
DENNIS VACA BACKHOE
03/03/2006
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
03/03/2006
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
03/03/2006
DFM ASSOCIATES
03/03/2006
EASYLINK SERVICES CORP.
03/03/2006
FEDERAL EXPRESS
03/03/2006
FERRELL'S AUTO REPAIR
03/03/2006
FGL ENVIRONMENTAL
03/03/2006
FIRST AM REAL ESTATE SOLUTIONS
03/03/2006
NATHAN FULLER
03/03/2006
GEM AUTO PARTS
03/03/2006
GEOSOLUTIONS, INC.
03/03/2006
GILBERT'S LANDSCAPES
03/03/2006
GLENN'S REPAIR &RENTAL
03/03/2006
KENNETH GLYNN
03/03/2006
GOLDFARB & LIPMAN, LLP
03/03/2006
GOLDING CONCRETE SAWING
03/03/2006
'GRISANTI HARDWARE
03/03/2006
GUTTER PROS
03/03/2006
H.D. PETERSON
03/03/2006
HARMONY MACHINE & FABRICATION
03/03/2006
HART IMPRESSIONS PRINT & COPY
Description
Amount
Accounts
Payable
Check
1,302.15
Accounts
Payable
Check
70.00
Accounts
Payable
Check
3,297.94
Accounts
Payable
Check
2,198.62
Accounts
Payable
Check
60.00
Accounts
Payable
Check
11.23
Accounts
Payable
Check
196.70
Accounts
Payable
Check
35.00
Accounts
Payable
Check
67.57
Accounts
Payable
Check
347.06
Accounts
Payable
Check
75,032.10
Accounts
Payable
Check
731.33
Accounts
Payable
Check
59.50
Accounts
Payable
Check
1,243.89
Accounts
Payable
Check
2,360.00
Accounts,
Payable
Check
3,087.00
Accounts
Payable
Check
1,053.21
Accounts
Payable
Check
48.26
Accounts
Payable
Check
12.32
Accounts
Payable
Check
72.90
Accounts
Payable
Check
185.00
Accounts
Payable
Check
195.00
Accounts
Payable
Check
100.00
Accounts
Payable
Check
80.00
Accounts
Payable
Check
225.38
Accounts
Payable
Check
150.00
Accounts
Payable
Check
306.56
Accounts
Payable
Check
86.23
Accounts
Payable
Check
259.00
Accounts
Payable
Check
.15,500.00
Accounts
Payable
Check
292.50
Accounts
Payable
Check
164.10
Accounts
Payable
Check
3,225.00
Accounts
Payable
Check
1,517.50
Accounts
Payable
Check
65.15
Accounts
Payable
Check
328.40
26
27
Description Amount
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
160.00
50.00
1,318.64
565.94
1,990.71
624.28
62.71
40.00
353.92
496.66
1,589.79
100.00
27,063.06
44.27
12.50
95.50
939.11
450.00
40.00
2,775.01
103.00
1,075.70
730.90
787.89
26,024.08
564.73
113.40
102.84
1,052.25
74.98
10.00
2,209.35
917.86
310.42
10.00
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of March 2006
Check
Check
Number
Date
Vendor
104306
03/03/2006
NATHAN HASCH
104307
03/03/2006
HEIDI HASKELL
104308
03/03/2006
HASTY AWARDS
104309
03/03/2006
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
104310
03/03/2006
INTERSTATE SALES
104311
03/03/2006
JESPERSEN'S TIRE SERVICE, INC.
104312
03/03/2006
JIFFY LUBE/SOUND BILLING
104313
03/03/2006
COURTNEY JONES
104314
03/03/2006
KRITZ EXCAVATING & TRUCKING
104315
03/03/2006
L.N. CURTIS & SONS
104316
03/03/2006
LAB SAFETY SUPPLY, INC.
104317
03/03/2006
JAMES R. LEWIS
104318
03/03/2006
LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE
104319
03/03/2006
LIFE ASSIST, INC.
104320
03/03/2006
LIMELIGHT MUSIC AND GIFTS
104321
03/03/2006
LOCATE PLUS CORPORATION
104322
03/03/2006
LYNDON'S AUTOMOTIVE
104323
03/03/2006
MAINLINE UTILITY CO.
104324
03/03/2006
STEVEN A. MANIER
104325
03/03/2006
MATHIS & ASSOCIATES
104326
03/03/2006
DAN MCGAULEY
104327
03/03/2006
STEVE MCHARRIS
104328
03/03/2006
WADE MCKINNEY
104329
03/03/2006
MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO.
104330
03/03/2006
MICHAEL FREDERICK PAVING,INC.
104331
03/03/2006
MID -COAST MOWER & SAW
104332
03/03/2006
MINER'S ACE HARDWARE
104333
03/03/2006
MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE
104334
03/03/2006
MORRO GROUP, INC.
104335
03/03/2006
LUCY MUNOZ
104336
03/03/2006
PAUL NETZ
104337
03/03/2006
OAK COUNTRY LUMBER & RANCH
104338
03/03/2006
OFFICE DEPOT INC.
104339
03/03/2006
OFFICEMAX CREDIT PLAN
104340
03/03/2006
GLENN OHLER
27
Description Amount
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
160.00
50.00
1,318.64
565.94
1,990.71
624.28
62.71
40.00
353.92
496.66
1,589.79
100.00
27,063.06
44.27
12.50
95.50
939.11
450.00
40.00
2,775.01
103.00
1,075.70
730.90
787.89
26,024.08
564.73
113.40
102.84
1,052.25
74.98
10.00
2,209.35
917.86
310.42
10.00
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of March 2006
Check
Check
Number
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount
104341
03/03/2006
OUTLET TOOL SUPPLY
Accounts Payable Check
1,052.55
104342
03/03/2006
PAPER WORKS
Accounts Payable Check
282.87
104343
03/03/2006
PASO ROBLES MAIN STREET ASSC.
Accounts Payable Check
195.00
104344
03/03/2006
PAUL BUVICK'S SWEEPING SERVICE
Accounts Payable Check
1,824.00
104345
03/03/2006
PC MECHANICAL, INC.
Accounts Payable Check
5,240.00
104346
03/03/2006
PCWORLD
Accounts Payable Check
33.97
104347
03/03/2006
PERRY'S ELECTRIC MOTORS & CTRL
Accounts Payable Check
2,304.13
104348
03/03/2006
PERRY'S PARCEL & COURIER SVC
Accounts Payable Check
119.25
104349
03/03/2006
POOR RICHARD'S PRESS
Accounts Payable Check
55.13
104350
03/0312006
PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION, INC.
Accounts Payable Check
107.44
104351
03/03/2006
PROCARE JANITORIAL SUPPLY
Accounts Payable Check
311.26
104352
03/03/2006
PROGRESSIVE MEDICAL INTERNATIO
Accounts Payable Check
52.73
104353
03/03/2006
GRACE L. PUCCI
Accounts Payable Check
472.50
104354
03/03/2006
QUICK CRETE PRODUCTS CORP.
Accounts Payable Check
870.87
104355
03/03/2006
QUILL CORPORATION
Accounts Payable Check
180.31
104356
03/03/2006
RADIO SHACK CORPORATION
Accounts Payable Check
38.03
104357
03/03/2006
RECOGNITION WORKS
Accounts Payable Check
301.35
• 104358
03/03/2006
STEVE ROMO _
Accounts Payable Check
40.00
104359
03/03/2006
RUSSCO
Accounts Payable Check
286.75
104360
03/03/2006
SAFETY-KLEEN INC.
Accounts Payable Check
216.60
104361
03/03/2006
SAN LUIS SECURITY
Accounts Payable Check
882.00
104362
03/03/2006
SANTA MARIA TIRE, INC.
Accounts Payable Check
131.79
104363
03/03/2006
SCOTT SATTERTHWAITE
Accounts Payable Check
50.00
104364
03/03/2006
SBC SMART YELLOW PAGES
Accounts Payable Check
251.47
104365
03/03/2006
SBC/MCI
Accounts Payable Check
127.03
104366
03/03/2006
SCHIMM'S TREE SERVICE, INC.
Accounts Payable Check
3,600.00
104367
03/03/2006
LISETTE SCHOLL
Accounts Payable Check
132.30
104368
03/03/2006
KAMAL SHAMASH M.D., INC.
Accounts Payable Check
125.00
104369
03/03/2006
RICHARD J. SHANNON
Accounts Payable Check
150.00
104370
03/03/2006
SHORES SERVICE
Accounts Payable Check
181.04
104371
03/03/2006
JOHN SIEMENS
Accounts Payable Check
429.70
104372
03/03/2006
SLO CO NARCOTICS TASK FORCE
Accounts Payable Check
609.80
104373
03/03/2006
SOUZA CONSTRUCTION INC.
Accounts Payable Check
94,457.87
104374
03/03/2006
STAPLES CREDIT PLAN
Accounts Payable Check
429.19
• 104375
03/03/2006
STEWART'S WHEEL SHOP
Accounts Payable Check
90.00
104376
03/03/2006
SUN BADGE COMPANY
Accounts Payable Check
29.25
go
Check
Number
104377
104378
104379
104380
104381
104382
104383
104384
104385
104386
i[1r'191- r1
104388
104389
104390
405
104391
104393
104394
104395
104396
104397
104398
104399
104400
104416
104419
104420
104421
104422
104423
104401
104402
104403
104404
29
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of March 2006
Check
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount
03/03/2006
SUNLIGHT JANITORIAL
Accounts Payable Check
1,409.64
03/03/2006
TARVIN & ASSOCIATES
Accounts Payable Check
840.00
03/03/2006
TAYLOR RENTAL CENTER
Accounts Payable Check
32.83
03/03/2006
TEMPLETON UNIFORMS
Accounts Payable Check
519.06
03/03/2006
CHRISTOPHER DANIEL THOMAS
Accounts Payable Check
80.00
03/03/2006
TODD PIPE & SUPPLY
Accounts Payable Check
1,440.37
03/03/2006
UNION ASPHALT, INC.
Accounts Payable Check
1,701.62
03/03/2006
UNITED RENTALS NORTHWEST, INC
Accounts Payable Check
5,489.77
03/03/2006
UNITED STAFFING ASSOCIATES
Accounts Payable Check
1,020.00
03/03/2006
UPS
Accounts Payable Check
22.14
03/03/2006
VIGNERON, INC.
Accounts Payable Check
170.00
03/03/2006
WESTATES TRUCK EQUIPMENT CORP
Accounts Payable Check
76.67
03/03/2006
BRIAN WESTERMAN
Accounts Payable Check
10.00
03/03/2006
SUSAN M. WILLIAMS
Accounts Payable Check
15.66
03/06/2006
MID -STATE BANK
03/06/2006
AFLAC
03/06/2006
BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA
03/06/2006
BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA
03/06/2006
DELTA DENTAL, ATTN: ACCOUNTING
03/06/2006
THE STANDARD UNIT 22
03/06/2006
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE CO.
03/06/2006
DAVID W. BROWN PAINTING
03/06/2006
VOID
03/06/2006
RANCHO MOTOR CO.
03/09/2006
CELLULAR ONE
03/09/2006
I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SERVICES
03/09/2006
BOB JOSLIN
03/09/2006
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC
03/09/2006
FINANCE DEPARTMENT PETTY CASH
03/09/2006
SAN LUIS OBISPO CO ENVIRONMENT
03/10/2006
ATASCADERO FIRE EMPLOYEE ASSN.
03/10/2006
ATASCADERO MID MGRS ORG UNION
03/10/2006
ATASCADERO POLICE OFFICERS ASN
03/10/2006
FAMILY SUPPORT DIVISION
Accounts Payable Check
174.52
Payroll Vendor Payment
3,427.90
Accounts
Payable
Payroll Vendor Payment
96,254.9*
Payroll Vendor Payment
1,747.11
Payroll Vendor Payment
8,160.74
Payroll Vendor Payment
954.56
Payroll Vendor Payment
624.68
Accounts Payable Check
825.00
Accounts Payable Check
0.00
Accounts Payable Check
34,338.40
Accounts
Payable
Check
951.09
Accounts
Payable
Check
11,020.81
Accounts
Payable
Check
100.00
Accounts
Payable
Check
2,923.92
Accounts
Payable
Check
413.61
Accounts
Payable
Check
793.00
Payroll Vendor Payment 570.00
Payroll Vendor Payment 20.00
Payroll Vendor Payment 599.50
Payroll Vendor Payment 207.6
Check
tuber
104405
104406
104407
104408
104409
104410
104411
104412
104413
104414
104415
406
104424
104425
104426
104427
104428
104429
104430
104431
104432
104433
104434
104436
104437
104439
104440
104441
104442
104443
104444
104445
104446
104447
Check
Date
03/10/2006
03/10/2006
03/10/2006
03/10/2006
03/10/2006
03/10/2006
03/10/2006
03/10/2006
03/10/2006
03/10/2006
03/10/2006
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of March 2006
Vendor
EMPLOYMENT DEV DEPARTMENT
EMPLOYMENT DEV. DEPARTMENT
HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE
ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 401
ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 457
KENNEDY CLUB FITNESS
NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION
PERS LONG TERM CARE PROGRAM
CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEP
SEIU LOCAL 620
UNITED WAY OF SLO COUNTY
03/14/2006 MID -STATE BANK
Description
Amount
Payroll Vendor Payment
8,354.69
Payroll Vendor Payment
843.80
Payroll Vendor Payment
10,308.45
Payroll Vendor Payment
2,323.37
Payroll Vendor Payment
854.88
Payroll Vendor Payment
88.00
Payroll Vendor Payment
450.78
Payroll Vendor Payment
16.19
Payroll Vendor Payment
68,298.21
Payroll Vendor Payment
695.52
Payroll Vendor Payment
26.00
Payroll Vendor Payment 37,333.15
03/18/2006
A & T ARBORISTS
Accounts Payable Check
1,137.15
03/18/2006
A CLEAR PERSPECTIVE
Accounts Payable Check
1,150.00
03/18/2006
ACTION TOWING & RECOVERY, LLC
Accounts Payable Check
50.00
03/18/2006
AIR -LEFT REFRIGERATION & HTG
Accounts Payable Check
160.87
03/18/2006
ALL ABOUT PRODUCE, CORP.-
Accounts Payable Check
1,039.38
03/18/2006
ALLSTAR FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC.
Accounts Payable Check
656.14
03/18/2006
AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL SAFETY
Accounts Payable Check
22.52
03/18/2006
AMERICAN MARBORG
Accounts Payable Check
145.54
03/18/2006
ANTECH DIAGNOSTICS
Accounts Payable Check
41.50
03/18/2006
API, ATLAS PERFORMANCE INDUST
Accounts Payable Check
410.00
03/18/2006
AQUAMARK POOL CARE
Accounts Payable Check
156.90
03/18/2006
ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
Accounts Payable Check
1,125.06
03/18/2006
GINA ARIAS
Accounts Payable Check
25.76
03/18/2006
ARLYNE'S FLOWERS & ETC.
Accounts Payable Check
367.86
03/18/2006
AT&T
Accounts Payable Check
42.59
03/18/2006
ATASCADERO COMMUNITY
Accounts Payable Check
31,133.00
03/18/2006
ATASCADERO FORD
Accounts Payable Check
1,443.32
03/18/2006
ATASCADERO GLASS, INC.
Accounts Payable Check
275.00
03/18/2006
ATASCADERO LOAVES & FISHES
Accounts Payable Check
7,040.00
03/18/2006
ATASCADERO MAIN STREET
Accounts Payable Check
14,790.00
03/18/2006
ATASCADERO MUTUAL WATER CO.
Accounts Payable Check
102.60
03/18/2006
ATASCADERO NEWS
Accounts Payable Check
4,396.18
03/18/2006
ATASCADERO PLUMBING
Accounts Payable Check
1,831.16
30
Check
Number
104448
104449
104450
104451
104452
104453
104454
104455
104456
104457
104458
104459
104460
104461
104462
104463
104464
104465
104466
104467
104468
104469
104470
104471
104472
104473
104474
104475
104476
104477
104478
104479
104480
104481
104482
104483
31
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of March 2006
Check
Date Vendor Description
03/18/2006
ATASCADERO TEMPLE ASSOCIATION
03/18/2006
ATASCADERO TRAFFIC WAY STORAGE
03/18/2006
ATC ASSOCIATES, INC.
03/18/2006
AVAYA INC.
03/18/2006
B.W.S. DISTRIBUTORS, INC.
0.3/18/2006
BANGERT CONSULTING
03/18/2006
BANK OF NEW YORK
03/18/2006
BASSETT'S CRICKET RANCH,INC.
03/18/2006
BAY LAUREL GARDEN CENTER
03/18/2006
SHERRY BAZZELL
03/18/2006
CINDY K. BENSON
03/18/2006
BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP
03/18/2006
BFGC ARCHITECTS PLANNERS, INC.
03/18/2006
BOB'S CRANE SERVICE
03/18/2006
BRYAN BOOTS
03/18/2006
BOUND TREE MEDICAL, LLC
03/18/2006
JEFF BRAZZI
03/18/2006
BRENDLER JANITORIAL SERVICE
03/18/2006
CAL -COAST REFRIGERATION, INC
03/18/2006
CALIFORNIA CODE CHECK
03/18/2006
CALIFORNIA CONSERVATION CORP
03/18/2006
CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL
03/18/2006
CANNON ASSOCIATES
03/18/2006
CASHIERS OFFICE
03/18/2006
CED
03/18/2006
CENTRAL COAST ARCHAEOLOGY
03/18/2006
CENTRAL COAST BRIDE
03/18/2006
CENTRAL COAST CONTAINERS
03/18/2006
CENTRAL COAST PLAYGROUNDS
03/18/2006
CENTRAL COAST STRIPING, INC.
03/18/2006
CENTRAL COAST WATER TREATMENT
03/18/2006
CHEM CLEAN
03/18/2006
BRADY CHERRY
03/18/2006
CHEVRON
03/18/2006
CHICAGO GRADE LANDFILL
03/18/2006
JOSEPH CHOUINARD P.E.
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Amount
455.00
1,067.00
34,158.60
22.42
768.87
5,322.98
2,279.00
109.86
63.50
41.01
819.35
4,701.97
3,250.00
250.00
160.00
238.02
70.0
595.0
90.39
22,385.43
1,200.00
120.00
305.00
154.00
406.81
1,375.00
350.00
2,981.96
10,379.92
1,268.00
140.00
312.68
300.00
970.11
40*
6,853.01
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of March 2006
Check
umber
Check
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount
104484
03/18/2006
CINGULAR WIRELESS
Accounts Payable Check
88.72
104485
03/18/2006 •
CJP PRODUCTIONS
Accounts Payable Check
600.00
104486
03/18/2006
JERRY L. CLAY
Accounts Payable Check
75.00
104487
03/18/2006
CLEAN WATER SYSTEMS, INC.
Accounts Payable Check
35.00
104488
03/18/2006
COAST ELECTRONICS
Accounts Payable Check
83.66
104489
03/18/2006
COASTAL COPY, LP
Accounts Payable Check
317.13
104490
03/18/2006
COASTAL IMAGING SUPPLIES
Accounts Payable Check
164.09
104491
03/18/2006
COASTLINE EQUIPMENT
Accounts Payable Check
1,487.68
104492
03/18/2006
CONOCOPHILLIPS
Accounts Payable Check
3,300.66
104493
03/18/2006
CONSOLIDATED PLASTICS COMPANY
Accounts Payable Check
169.97
104494
03/18/2006
COOPERATIVE PERSONNEL SERVICES
Accounts Payable Check
511.50
104495
03/18/2006
CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER
Accounts Payable Check
178.00
104496
03/18/2006
CSK AUTO, INC.
Accounts Payable Check
13.88
104497
03/18/2006
CTM GROUP, INC.
Accounts Payable Check
188.30
104498
03/18/2006
CUSTOM DESIGN SOFTWARE, INC.
Accounts Payable Check
10,031.25
104499
03/18/2006
DARRYUS LOCK AND SAFE
Accounts Payable Check
113.65
104500
03/18/2006
DATAPRINT CORPORATION
Accounts Payable Check
272.25
104501
03/18/2006
VOID
Accounts Payable Check
0.00
104502
03/18/2006
DECOU LUMBER COMPANY
Accounts Payable Check
473.69
104503
03/18/2006
PATRICIA DEIRMENJIAN
Accounts Payable Check
25.39
104504
03/18/2006
DOCUTEAM
Accounts Payable Check
24.95
104505
03/18/2006
DOGGIE WALK BAGS COMPANY
Accounts Payable Check
134.69
104506
03/18/2006
MANDY DUMONG
Accounts Payable Check
69.70
104507
03/18/2006
MIKE DURKEE
Accounts Payable Check
48.00
104508
03/18/2006
RICHARD DUTRA
Accounts Payable Check
35.00
104509
03/18/2006
EL CAMINO CAR WASH LLC
Accounts Payable Check
14.95
104510
03/18/2006
EL CAMINO HOMELESS ORG.
Accounts Payable Check
5,062.41
104511
03/18/2006
ESCUELA DEL RIO
Accounts Payable Check
178.20
104512
03/18/2006
EWING
Accounts Payable Check
315.62
104513
03/18/2006
KEITH J. FALERIOS
Accounts Payable Check
20.00
104514
03/18/2006
FEDERAL EXPRESS
Accounts Payable Check
19.33
104515
03/18/2006
FENCE FACTORY ATASCADERO
Accounts Payable Check
138.64
104516
03/18/2006
FERRELL'S AUTO REPAIR
Accounts Payable Check
299.82
104517
03/18/2006
FGL ENVIRONMENTAL
Accounts Payable Check
441.00
104518
03/18/2006
FOOD FOR LESS
Accounts Payable Check
139.77
32
Check
Number
104519
104520
104521
104522
104523
104524
104525
104526
104527
104528
104529
104530
104531
104532
104533
104534
104535
104536
104537
104538
104539
104540
104541
104542
104543
104544
104545
104546
104547
104548
104549
104550
104551
104552
104553
104554
33
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of March 2006
Check
Date Vendor
03/18/2006 KEN FORMAN
03/18/2006 WARREN FRACE
03/18/2006
FRANKIE'S DELI
03/18/2006
FRAZEE INDUSTRIES, INC.
03/18/2006 `
NATHAN FULLER
03/18/2006
FURNITURE INSTALLATION TEAM
03/18/2006
GAS COMPANY
03/18/2006
GLEN GAULTNEY
03/18/2006
GEM AUTO PARTS
03/18/2006
CHARLES GENASCI
03/18/2006
GIBBS INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS
03/18/2006
GILBERT'S LANDSCAPES
03/18/2006
GRISANTI HARDWARE
03/18/2006
H.D. PETERSON
03/18/2006
BRIAN J. HAMPTON
03/18/2006
ASHLEY HARRIS
03/18/2006
HART IMPRESSIONS PRINT & COPY
03/18/2006
HI STANDARD AUTOMOTIVE
03/18/2006
HINDERLITER, DE LLAMAS
03/18/2006
HOBBY BODY & PAINT SHOP
03/18/2006
WILLIE E. HOLLOWAY
03/18/2006
HSM ELECTRONIC PROTECTION SCVS
03/18/2006
IRON MOUNTAIN RECORDS MGMNT
03/18/2006
J.S.M. ELECTRIC
03/18/2006
JIFFY LUBE/SOUND BILLING
03/18/2006
JOBS AVAILABLE, INC.
03/18/2006
COURTNEY JONES
03/18/2006
STEVEN KAHN
03/18/2006
KERSEY S ATASCADERO QUICK LUBE
03/18/2006
KPRL 1230 AM
03/18/2006
JAMES R. LEWIS
03/18/2006
LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE
03/18/2006
GEORGE W. LUNA
03/18/2006
MADRONE LANDSCAPING
03/18/2006
DAVID C. MAIN, AIA
03/18/2006
MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK, INC.
Description
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Amount •
492.23
300.00
111.81
133.75
80.00
6,752.00
4,940.82
4,782.32
970.63
35.00
3.89
150.00
58.47
443.16
50.00
29.79
661.666
11,317.73
900.00
2,943.61
600.00
390.00
73.50
315.00
158.53
479.40
237.16
350.00
36.67
144.00
250.00
104.00
75.00
1,130.00
2,750.00
284.35
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of March 2006
Check
umber
Check
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount
104555
03/18/2006
STEVEN A. MANIER
Accounts Payable Check
40.00
104556
03/18/2006
MATTHEW BENDER & CO., INC.
Accounts Payable Check
147.47
104557
03/18/2006
BECKY MAXWELL
Accounts Payable Check
64.65
104558
03/18/2006
MCALLISTER OFFICE PAVILION
Accounts Payable Check
6,627.77
104559
03/18/2006
ERIN MCGRATH
Accounts Payable Check
8.90
104560
03/18/2006
STEVE MCHARRIS
Accounts Payable Check
145.02
104561
03/18/2006
WADE MCKINNEY
Accounts Payable Check
500.00
104562
03/18/2006
SAM MCMILLAN
Accounts Payable Check
56.00
104563
03/18/2006
CORY MEYER
Accounts Payable Check
20.00
104564
03/18/2006
MICHAEL FREDERICK PAVING,INC.
Accounts Payable Check
2,011.59
104565
03/18/2006
MICHAEL'S WINDOW CLEANING
Accounts Payable Check
75.00
104567
03/18/2006
MINER'S ACE HARDWARE
Accounts Payable Check
1,563.12
104568
03/18/2006
MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE
Accounts Payable Check
80.04
104569
03/18/2006
DAVID MONGE
Accounts Payable Check
40.00
104570
03/18/2006
NORTH COUNTY DIESEL
Accounts Payable Check
768.77
104571
03/18/2006
THOMAS P. O'MALLEY
Accounts Payable Check
75.00
104572
03/18/2006
OFFICE DEPOT INC.
Accounts Payable Check
836.20
104573
03/18112006
OUTLET TOOL SUPPLY
Accounts Payable Check
406.93
104574
03/18/2006
BECKY J. PACAS
Accounts Payable Check
75.00
104575
03/18/2006
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC
Accounts Payable Check
5,095.85
104576
03/18/2006
PADRE ASSOCIATES, INC.
Accounts Payable Check
293.05
104577
03/18/2006
PASO ROBLES ELECTRIC, INC.
Accounts Payable Check
63.30
104578
03/18/2006
PASO ROBLES SAFE & LOCK
Accounts Payable Check
194.00
104579
03/18/2006
KATHLEEN A. PENCE
Accounts Payable Check
6,581.25
104580
03/18/2006
PERFORMANCE CLEANING SYSTEMS
Accounts Payable Check
200.00
104581
03/18/2006
PERRY'S PARCEL & COURIER SVC
Accounts Payable Check
82.83
104582
03/18/2006
KAREN POLAND
Accounts Payable Check
14.37
104583
03/18/2006
PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION, INC.
Accounts Payable Check.
1,178.68
104584
03/18/2006
PRINT LOGIC, INC.
Accounts Payable Check
70.00
104585
03/18/2006
PRO MOTION SIGNS & SPORTS
Accounts Payable Check
91.16
104586
03/18/2006
PROCARE JANITORIAL SUPPLY
Accounts Payable Check
633.19
104587
03/18/2006
PSC INDUSTRIAL OUTSCOURCING IN
Accounts Payable Check
590.00
104588
03/18/2006
GRACE L. PUCCI
Accounts Payable Check
622.50
104589
03/18/2006
RECALL SECURE DESTRUCTION SERV
Accounts Payable Check
61.53
104590
03/18/2006
RACHELLE RICKARD
Accounts Payable Check
300.00
34
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of March 2006
Check
Check
Number
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount 0
104591
03/18/2006
ROHRER HAY & FEED SALES
Accounts Payable Check
211.28
104592
03/18/2006
SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY SHERIFF
Accounts Payable Check
28,814.94
104593
03/18/2006
SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY TAX COL
Accounts Payable Check
55,461.00
104594
03/18/2006
SANTA MARIA TIRE, INC.
Accounts Payable Check
732.81
104595
03/18/2006
SANTA MARIA TOOL, INC.
Accounts Payable Check
9,987.82
104596
03/18/2006
SBC
Accounts Payable Check
1,134.96
104597
03/18/2006
SBC/MCI
Accounts Payable Check
1,014.91
104598
03/18/2006
WENDY SCALISE
Accounts Payable Check
75.00
104599
03/18/2006
MICHELE SCHAMBER
Accounts Payable Check
20.00
104600
03/18/2006
SCHIMM'S TREE SERVICE, INC.
Accounts Payable Check
875.00
104601
03/18/2006
SCMAF .
Accounts Payable Check
25.00
104602
03/18/2006
SCOTT O'BRIEN FIRE & SAFETY CO
Accounts Payable Check
190.71
104603
03/18/2006
SHELL
Accounts Payable Check
390.60
104604
03/18/2006
GEORGE SITYAVITZ
Accounts Payable Check
49.32
104605
03/18/2006
SIGN OUTLET
Accounts Payable Check
1,644.99
104606
03/18/2006
SLIGH CABINETS, INC
Accounts Payable Check
2,400.00
104607
03/18/2006
SLO COUNTY CLERK RECORDER
Accounts Payable Check
1,275.0
104608
03/18/2006
SMART AND FINAL
Accounts Payable Check
152.40
104609
03/18/2006
KATE STEINBECK
Accounts Payable Check
86.82
104610
03/18/2006
GARI STINEBAUGH
Accounts Payable Check
100.00
104611
03/18/2006
KURT W. STONE
Accounts Payable Check
40.00
104612
03/18/2006
SUN BADGE COMPANY
Accounts Payable Check
109.98
104613
03/18/2006
SUNLIGHT JANITORIAL
Accounts Payable Check
1,269.90
104614
03/18/2006
SUPERIOR QUALITY COPIERS, INC.
Accounts Payable Check
54.76
104615
03/18/2006
TAYLOR RENTAL CENTER
Accounts Payable Check
59.21
104616
03/18/2006
TED MILES JEEP
Accounts Payable Check
225.00
104617
03/18/2006
TEMPLETON FEED & GRAIN
Accounts Payable Check
86.00
104618
03/18/2006
TESORO
Accounts Payable Check
5,352.57
104619
03/18/2006
KRISTIN K. THAYER
Accounts Payable Check
300.00
104620
03/18/2006
CHRISTOPHER DANIEL THOMAS
Accounts Payable Check
70.00
104621
03/18/2006
RUSS TOLCHARD
Accounts Payable Check
34.16
104622
03/18/2006
TOWN & COUNTRY FENCING
Accounts Payable Check
20,285.00
104623
03/18/2006
UNION ASPHALT, INC.
Accounts Payable Check
381.57
104624
03/18/2006
UNITED STAFFING ASSOCIATES
Accounts Payable Check
1,280.00
104625
03/18/2006
USA BLUE BOOK
Accounts Payable Check
266.1 0
104626
03/18/2006
VALLEY PACIFIC PETROLEUM SVCS
Accounts Payable Check
5,866.14
35
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of March 2006
Check
umber
Check
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount
104627
03/18/2006
VERIZON WIRELESS
Accounts Payable Check
1,476.15
104628
03/18/2006
WILLIAM VETTER
Accounts Payable Check
2,441.60
104629
03/18/2006
VIBORG SAND & GRAVEL, INC.
Accounts Payable Check
110,042.40
104630
03/18/2006
WALLACE GROUP
Accounts Payable Check
4,096.42
104631
03/18/2006
WYSONG CONSTRUCTION
Accounts Payable Check
50,670.00
407
03/20/2006
MID -STATE BANK
Accounts Payable Check
500.00
408
03/20/2006
MID -STATE BANK
Accounts Payable Check
75.00
409
03/20/2006
MID -STATE BANK
Accounts Payable Check
10.00
410
03/20/2006
MID -STATE BANK
Accounts Payable Check
70.00
414
03/22/2006
MID -STATE BANK
Accounts, Payable Check
66.00
411
03/24/2006
MID -STATE BANK
Accounts Payable Check
42.00
412 _
03/24/2006
MID -STATE BANK
Accounts Payable Check
66.00
413
03/24/2006
MID -STATE BANK
Accounts Payable Check
84.70
415
03/24/2006
MID -STATE BANK
Accounts Payable Check
42.00
104632
03/24/2006
ATASCADERO FIRE EMPLOYEE ASSN.
Payroll Vendor Payment
650.00
104633
03/24/2006
ATASCADERO MID MGRS ORG UNION
Payroll Vendor Payment
20.00
104634
03/24/2006
ATASCADERO POLICE OFFICERS ASN
Payroll Vendor Payment
599.55
104635
03/24/2006
AXA EQUITABLE
Payroll Vendor Payment
371.15
104636
03/24/2006
FAMILY SUPPORT DIVISION
Payroll Vendor Payment
207.69
104637
03/24/2006
CITIPAC
Payroll Vendor Payment
30.00
104638
03/24/2006
EMPLOYMENT DEV DEPARTMENT
Payroll Vendor Payment
8,174.68
104639
03/24/2006
EMPLOYMENT DEV. DEPARTMENT
Payroll Vendor Payment
820.76
104640
03/24/2006
HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE
Payroll Vendor Payment
10,308.45
104641
03/24/2006
ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 457
Payroll Vendor Payment
854.88
104642
03/24/2006
KENNEDY CLUB FITNESS
Payroll Vendor Payment
88.00
104643
03/24/2006
NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION
Payroll Vendor Payment
483.26
104644
03/24/2006
PERS LONG TERM CARE PROGRAM
Payroll Vendor Payment
16.19
104645
03/24/2006
CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEP
Payroll Vendor Payment
67,931.12
104646
03/24/2006
SEIU LOCAL 620
Payroll Vendor Payment
661.33
104647
03/24/2006
UNITED WAY OF SLO COUNTY
Payroll Vendor Payment
31.00
416
03/28/2006
MID -STATE BANK
Payroll Vendor Payment
36,440.04
104648
03/31/2006
AAA APPLIANCE SERVICE
Accounts Payable Check
399.55
104649
03/31/2006
ACE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY
Accounts Payable Check
440.09
36
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of March 2006
Check
Number
Check
Date
Vendor.
Description
Amount
104650
03/31/2006
AGP VIDEO
Accounts Payable Check
350.00
104651
03/31/2006
AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT
Accounts Payable Check
600.70
104652
03/31/2006
AIRGAS WEST
Accounts Payable Check
92.08
104653
03/31/2006
ALLAN HANCOCK COLLEGE
Accounts Payable Check
135.00
104654
03/31/2006
ALTHOUSE & MEADE, INC.
Accounts Payable Check
1,776.52
104655
03/31/2006
ALTHOUSE & MEADE, INC.
Accounts Payable Check
713.00
104656
03/31/2006
AMERICAN EXPRESS
Accounts Payable Check
220.60
104657
03/31/2006
AMERICAN MARBORG
Accounts Payable Check
85.16
104658
03/31/2006
PAULA ANTON
Accounts Payable Check
244.10
104659
03/31/2006
API, ATLAS PERFORMANCE INDUST
Accounts Payable Check
205.00
104660
03/31/2006
ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
Accounts Payable Check
431.34
104661
03/31/2006 ,
ATASCADERO FORD
Accounts Payable Check
1,244.29
104662
03/31/2006
ATASCADERO MUTUAL WATER CO.
Accounts Payable Check
126.15
104663
03/31/2006
ATASCADERO NEWS
Accounts Payable Check
1,581.50
104664
03/31/2006-
ROBERT J. BAGBY
Accounts Payable Check
220.70
104665
03/31/2006
BANGERT CONSULTING
Accounts Payable Check
3,977.02
104666
03/31/2006
BATTERY SYSTEMS
Accounts Payable Check
325.70
104667
03/31/2006
AMY M. BEEMAN
Accounts Payable Check
Y
277.20
104668
03/31/2006
CINDY K. BENSON
Accounts Payable Check
300.30
104669
03/31/2006
LAURA BERNA
Accounts Payable Check
66.00
104670
03/31/2006
BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP
Accounts Payable Check
6,381.40
104671
03/31/2006
BIG TRAY
Accounts Payable Check
3,896.39
104672
03/31/2006
DIANE L. BISTAGNE
Accounts Payable Check
79.80
104673
03/31/2006
BLUEPRINTER
Accounts Payable Check
30.57
104674
03/31/2006
BP GRAPHICS & SCREENPRINT, INC
Accounts Payable Check
2,144.65
104675
03/31/2006
JEFF BRAZZI
Accounts Payable Check
20.00
104676
03/31/2006
BRENDLER JANITORIAL SERVICE
Accounts Payable Check
180.00
104677
03/31/2006
BRINAR CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Accounts Payable Check
6,701.54
104678
03/31/2006
CALIFORNIA CONSERVATION CORP
Accounts Payable Check
800.00
104679
03/31/2006
CANNON ASSOCIATES
Accounts Payable Check
3,081.00
104680
03/31/2006
CED
Accounts Payable Check
33.82
104681
03/31/2006
CELLULAR ONE
Accounts Payable Check
887.35
104682
03/31/2006
CHICAGO GRADE LANDFILL
Accounts Payable Check
40.00
104683
03/31/2006
KATHY J. CINOWALT
Accounts Payable Check
196.00
104684
03/31/2006
COAST ELECTRONICS
Accounts Payable Check
912.4
104685
03/31/2006
COASTAL IMAGING SUPPLIES
Accounts Payable Check
201.19
37
Check
0umber
104686
104687
104688
104689
104690
104691
104692
104693
104694
104695
104696
104697
104698
104699
104700
104701
104702
104703
104704
104705
104706
104707
104708
104709
104710
104711
104712
104713
104714
104715
104716
104717
104718
104719
104720
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of March 2006
Check
GAS COMPANY
Date
Vendor
03/31/2006
MARGERY CONNER
03/31/2006
COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
03/31/2006
CREDIT BUREAU
03/31/2006
CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER
03/31/2006
CUESTA COLLEGE
03/31/2006
DARRYUS LOCK AND SAFE
03/31/2006
DAN DAVIS
03/31/2006
GAIL L. DAVIS
03/31/2006
JOSHUA STEPHEN DAWSON-LEISURE
03/31/2006
DECOU LUMBER COMPANY
03/31/2006
PATRICIA DEIRMENJIAN
03/31/2006
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
03/31/2006
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
03/31/2006
DOOLEY ENTERPRISES INC
03/31/2006
DRIVER ALLIANT INSURANCE
03/31/2006
EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC
03/31/2006
EASY FUNDRAISING IDEAS
03/31/2006
EASYLINK SERVICES CORP.
03/31/2006
EL CAMINO CAR WASH LLC
03/31/2006
KEITH J. FALERIOS
03/31/2006
FERRELL'S AUTO REPAIR
03/31/2006
FGL ENVIRONMENTAL
03/31/2006
FIRST AM REAL ESTATE SOLUTIONS
03/31/2006
FOOD FOR LESS
03/31/2006
FRAZEE INDUSTRIES, INC.
03/31/2006
NATHAN FULLER
03/31/2006
FURNITURE INSTALLATION TEAM
03/31/2006
GAS COMPANY
03/31/2006
GEM AUTO PARTS
03/31/2006
GILBERT'S LANDSCAPES
03/31/2006
KELLY GLEASON
03/31/2006
GLEN N,BURDETTE,PHILLIPS,&
03/31/2006
KENNETH GLYNN
03/31/2006
GOLDEN STATE COPIER & MAILING
03/31/2006
GRAY LIFT, INC.
Description
Amount
Accounts Payable Check
42.00
Accounts Payable Check
43.00
Accounts Payable Check
8.64
Accounts Payable Check
168.00
Accounts Payable Check
50.00
Accounts Payable Check
193.25
Accounts Payable Check
609.00
Accounts Payable Check
2,218.85
Accounts Payable Check
580.00
Accounts Payable Check
12.24
Accounts Payable Check
32.68
Accounts Payable Check
2,090.00
Accounts Payable Check
1,252.12
Accounts Payable Check
1,483.88
Accounts Payable Check
2,626.00
Accounts Payable Check
2,194.50
Accounts Payable Check
375.00
Accounts Payable Check
2.13
Accounts Payable Check
29.90
Accounts Payable Check
10.00
Accounts Payable Check
185.20
Accounts Payable Check
691.00
Accounts Payable Check
100.00
Accounts Payable Check
43.55
Accounts Payable Check
470.37
Accounts Payable Check
80.00
Accounts Payable Check
185.00
Accounts Payable Check
2,517.21
Accounts Payable Check
155.47
Accounts Payable Check
8,153.00
Accounts Payable Check
140.00
Accounts Payable Check
3;200.00
Accounts Payable Check
259.00
Accounts Payable Check
1,400.00
Accounts Payable Check
904.72
Check
Number
104721
104722
104723
104724
104726
104727
104732
104733
104734
104735
104736
104737
104738
104739
104740
104741
104742
104743
104744
104745
104746
104747
104748
104749
104750
104751
104752
104753
104754
104755
104756
104757
104758
104759
104760
104761
M
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of March 2006
Check
Date Vendor
03/31/2006 GRISANTI HARDWARE
03/31/2006 ASHLEY HARRIS
03/31/2006 HART IMPRESSIONS PRINT & COPY
03/31/2006
03/31/2006
03/31/2006
03/31/2006
03/31/2006
03/31/2006
03/31/2006
03/31/2006
03/31/2006
03/31/2006
03/31/2006
03/31/2006
03/31/2006
03/31/2006
03/31/2006
03/31/2006
03/31/2006
03/31/2006
03/31/2006
03/31/2006
03/31/2006
03/31/2006
03/31/2006
03/31/2006
03/31/2006
03/31/2006
03/31/2006
03/31/2006
03/31/2006 `
03/31/2006
03/31/2006
03/31/2006
03/31/2006
HERITAGE HELMETS
HOME DEPOT
HSM ELECTRONIC PROTECTION SCVS
I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SERVICES
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
EVELYN INGRAM
INTERNATIONAL FOOTPRINT ASSC.
INTERNATIONAL POLICE TECHNOLOG
J. CARROLL
JACOB JAMISON
JESPERSEN'S TIRE SERVICE, INC.
JIFFY LUBE/SOUND BILLING
JOEL SWITZER DIESEL REPAIR
ROBERT M. JONES
JERI KNOTT
L.N. CURTIS & SONS
LAB SAFETY SUPPLY, INC.
LAUTZENHISER'S STATIONARY
LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE
LOCATE PLUS CORPORATION
CHRISTINE LUND
MAINLINE UTILITY CO.
STEVE MCHARRIS
MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO.
MCWILLIAMS CONSULTING
CANDICE MELENDEZ
DELMA MEYER
KEN MEYER
MGE UNDERGROUND, INC.
MICHAEL FREDERICK PAVING,INC.
MINER'S ACE HARDWARE
MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE
DAVID MONGE
Description
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Amount
—6
125.75
28.80
409.87
657.28
6,401.36
500.00
37,495.93
762.73
648.67
70.00
172.25
2,615.89
40.00
576.99
95.13
119.24
687.50
19.51
769.15 `
618.88
157.83
1,421.32
55.00
92.40
2,775.00
94.06
695.62
5,325.00
50.00
34.90
74.00
68,769.04
4,071.00
271.52
80.0
30.00
Check
tuber
104762
104763
104764
104765
104766
104767
104768
104770
104771
104772
104773
104774
104775
104776
104777
104778
1*104779
104780
104781
104782
104783
104784
104785
104786
104787
104788
104789
104790
104791
104792
104793
104794
104795
104796
• 104797
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of March 2006
Check
Date Vendor
03/31/2006
MORRO GROUP, INC.
03/31/2006
NEW EDGE NETWORKS TRANSEDGE
03/31/2006
NOWDOCS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
03/31/2006
MATTHEW J. O'CONNELL
03/31/2006
OFFICE DEPOT INC.
03/31/2006
ONE HOUR PHOTO STOP
03/31/2006
OUTLET TOOL SUPPLY
03/31/2006
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC
03/31/2006
PASO ROBLES ELECTRIC, INC.
03/31/2006
PASO ROBLES HEATING & AIR COND
03/31/2006
PASO ROBLES SAFE & LOCK
03/31/2006
KATHLEEN A. PENCE
03/31/2006
PETE JOHNSTON CHEVROLET
03/31/2006
FRED PFLUM
03/31/2006
PLANT DOCTOR
03/31/2006
POOR RICHARD'S PRESS
03/31/2006
PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION, INC.
03/31/2006
PRINT LOGIC, INC.
03/31/2006
PRO MOTION SIGNS & SPORTS
03/31/2006
PROCARE JANITORIAL SUPPLY
03/31/2006
PSOMAS
03/31/2006
GRACE L. PUCCI
03/31/2006
QUILL CORPORATION
03/31/2006
RECOGNITION WORKS
03/31/2006
REDWOOD TOXICOLOGY LABORATORY
03/31/2006
REESE WATER & LAND SURVEYING S
03/31/2006
REGAL ELECTRIC
03/31/2006
REGAL ELECTRIC
03/31/2006
RETURN ENGAGEMENTS
03/31/2006
REVENUE & COST SPECIALISTS LLC
03/31/2006
RACHELLE RICKARD
03/31/2006
CAROLE ROBINSON
03/31/2006
STEVE ROMO
03/31/2006
SAN LUIS OBISPO CO OFF. OF EDU
03/31/2006
SAN LUIS POWERHOUSE
Description
Amount
Accounts Payable Check
206.25
Accounts Payable Check
279.95
Accounts Payable Check
120.11
Accounts Payable Check
16.00
Accounts Payable Check
1,450.92
Accounts Payable Check
1,007.07
Accounts Payable Check
17.77
Accounts Payable Check
22,499.22
Accounts Payable Check
2,596.39
Accounts Payable Check
471.03
Accounts Payable Check
18.98
Accounts Payable Check
1,752.18
Accounts Payable Check
13.71
Accounts Payable Check
60.00
Accounts Payable Check
475.00
Accounts Payable Check
33.19
Accounts Payable Check
102.45
Accounts Payable Check
70:00
Accounts Payable Check
32.18
Accounts Payable Check
540.96
Accounts Payable Check
952.98
Accounts Payable Check
630.00
Accounts Payable Check
33.73
Accounts Payable Check
4.29
Accounts payable Check
6.00
Accounts Payable Check
1,355.00
Accounts Payable Check
7,795.88
Accounts Payable Check
3,511.64
Accounts Payable Check
107.50
Accounts Payable Check
10,352.87
Accounts Payable Check
43.39
Accounts Payable Check
460.00
Accounts Payable Check
81.00
Accounts Payable Check
520.00
Accounts Payable Check
635.00
Ed
Check
Number
104798
104799
104800
104801
104804
104805
104806
104807
104808
104809
104810
104811
104812
104813
104814
104815
104816
104817
104818
104819
104820
104821
104822
104824
104825
104826
104827
104828
104829
104830
104831
104832
41
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of March 2006
Check
Date
Vendor
03/31/2006
SANTA LUCIA SPORTSMEN ASSOCIAT
03/31/2006
SANTA MARIA TIRE, INC.
03/31/2006
SBC
03/31/2006
SBC SMART YELLOW PAGES
03/31/2006
SBC/MCI
03/31/2006
LISETTE SCHOLL
03/31/2006
SCOTT O'BRIEN FIRE & SAFETY CO
03/31/2006
JANELL SHERER
03/31/2006
JOHN SIEMENS
03/31/2006
SIMS FIRE PROTECTION, INC.
03/31/2006
SHANNON SIMS
03/31/2006
SLORTA
03/31/2006
DAVID L. SMAW
03/31/2006
SOUZA CONSTRUCTION INC.
03/31/2006
STAPLES CREDIT PLAN
03/31/2006
KRISTIN K. THAYER
03/31/2006
CHRISTOPHER DANIEL THOMAS
03/31/2006
TIME WARNER TELECOM
03/31/2006
TOP SHOP UPHOLSTERY
03/31/2006
MARCIA TORGERSON
03/31/2006
U.S. POSTMASTER
03/31/2006
U.S. POSTMASTER
03/31/2006
UNITED STAFFING ASSOCIATES
03/31/2006
US FILTER AERATOR PRODUCTS
03/31/2006
VALLEY PACIFIC PETROLEUM SVCS
03/31/2006
VERIZON WIRELESS
03/31/2006
VIBORG SAND & GRAVEL, INC.
03/31/2006
WALLACE GROUP
03/31/2006
WALLACE GROUP
03/31/2006
WESTERN FARM SERVICE, INC.
03/31/2006
SUSAN M. WILLIAMS
03/31/2006
WILSON LAND SURVEYS, INC.
03/31/2006
MARCUS C. WOLF
Description
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Accounts Payable Check
Amount
212.80
589.84
1,026.86
223.00
1,415.29
259.70
167.92
74.00
164.55
800.00
20.92
4,500.00
51.00
66,310.74
1,703.31
125.00
80.00
1,347.3]
167.24
120.00
160.00
160.00
6,444.00
9,939.93
1,038.05
294.97
34,024.00
10,738.34
3,305.00
2,377.00
62.64
2,944.70
128.00
$ 1,853,822.
ITEM NUMBER:
A — 3
DATE:
05/09/06
,'
® ago e a
Isis-
,
Atascadero City Council
March 2006
Staff Report - City Treasurer
March 2006, Investment Report
RECOMMENDATION:
Council approve the City Treasurer's report for March 2006
REPORT IN BRIEF:
Cash and Investments
Checking
$ 849,968
Money Market Accounts
2,083
Certificates of Deposit
8,308,837
Government Securities
8,292,030
LAIF
13,546,686
Cash with Fiscal Agents
149,161
Cash in Banks at March 31, 2006
$ 31,148,765
Deposits in Transit
Outstanding Checks
(613,279)
Cash and Investments at March 31, 2006
$ 30,535,486
Investment Activity
,Securities Purchased:
Purchase Date Description Type
Cost
Maturity Date
03/10/06 Federal Home Loan Bank gov't security
$ 250,000
03/10/10
Securities Matured:
None
Securities Sold/Called Prior to Maturity:
None
Other Reportable Activities:
None
•
Page 1 of 14
42
CITY OF ATASCADERO
TREASURER'S REPORT
CASH & INVESTMENTS ACTIVITY SUMMARY
FOR THE MONTH OF MARCH 2006
CHECKING
FISCAL
ACCOUNT INVESTMENTS
AGENT
TOTALS
Balance per Banks at
March 1, 2006
$ 369,993 $ 29,942,507
$ 184,097
$ 30,496,597
Receipts
2,335,467 129
446
2,336,042
Disbursements
(1,928,492) -
(35,382)
(1,963,874)
Transfers In from
Redevelopment LAIF
280,000 -
-
280,000
Transfers In
1,158,000 ' 1,365,000
2,523,000
Transfers Out
(1,365,000) (1,158,000)
-
(2,523,000)
Balance per Banks at
March 31, 2006
$ 849,968 $ 30,149,636
$ 149,161
31,148,765
Deposits in Transit
-
Outstanding Checks
(613,279)
Adjusted Treasurer's Balance
$ 30,535,486
43
Page 2 of 14
oo
.•
rrn
000
V
O
r
oo
V1
W
b
N
10
1
7
M
V
10
M
r0
M
Lij
ce
O
<Y
N
r
oo
lc
ao
0o
O
O
oo
�O
r
M
r
M
Nol
r
d'
O
O
-Ir
O
O
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Z
OLLQ
W
10
W
N
O
Ol
O
0`
O
M
O
O
of
O
U
r
(�
O
O
O
l�
O.
O
V'i
O
h
O
u1
O
O
O
O,
S
N
ed
e�tl
to
eV
N
t7
10
C,
N
C
1F
C
Z
Ou
r
10
M
O
O
o
v
o
o
o
o
o
O
o
O
Cl
O
o
O
O
O
o
O
o
O
w
10
00
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
M
O
O
O
O
O
O
M
O
O
O�
O
O
O
�
O
O�
O
�
O
O
O
O
O
Q
M
0
0
0
0
e
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
v
Z
o
v
o
o
v
v
ro
o
v
v
v
v
o
ry
b
a' N
O
o
o
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
e
o
o
Z M
^C7
Q
[r
C
C
o
oo
m
a
V
M
'+i
M
m
e+i
r•i
a
V
7
ri
d' d
,�
L
h c
\ CZ
N
N
td
ty
N
ted
N
R
N
N
j
f..
w
0
0
0
0
0
o
o
0
0
0
v
a
v
Z
..
C
A
v
A
a°i
A
aQi
A
aai
A
v
N
aAi
A
u
y
aAi
A
aAi
A
aai
A
A
A
y
Q
4
>
w
m
E
a
Id
w
w
w
w
c
v
�
�
Ci
U
U
U
U
C7
U
C7
U
U
U
V
U
C7
U
o
0
0
o
0
C
0
0
0
o
o
CD
N
C
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
u
E
m
c
4
>
o
°
�a
m
•w
�
\'�+
ah
"��"
u
Fey
o
�d
F
v
sq
oro
SM
E
Q
c
o
a
ex
z c
o¢o
um
;;
a�1
cy
e
c
Em
o
a3
w
e
c�
co
m 3
oC
q
tik
UU
e y
0 C4
o
C Y+
Y
� :Y
d
O F
d
L
O S
a b
L oq
p
R O
E u
O�
u
Z U
s
N�
m N
L .F
w
L
� Y
G
7
.�
r7
•
d
a
10
�o
1010
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
c
0
a
F
r
r
r
ol
O
...
\
\
N
O
'+1
O
O
W
O
00
O
oa
O
W
O
w
O
Q
=
O
O
O
O
44
Q O N
N`D r �° N oo V �o 00 N r .-• .• N '00 00 � r
Voo h V �O N O �D M N V M N �° V •� �
fr � e+' N M .� �• V1 °� .-• r N 00 00 l ' •� ^- �° N
vi 10 7 O
O+ o+ °, of °+ O+ of N
O O O O O O V't O O O O O O O O O O
O o O O O 0 O O O O O O O' O O O O
O O O V O O to O O O O O O O O O O
W r' of 10 a, - o0 of of v ao 10 o
p o of rn o, of o. N rn rn of a rn rn a rn rn o
O
Z
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cl 0 0 0 0 0 o S o
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 O o 0
oo O O O o O O O O O O O o O O o
`a rn rn o o a,o°'+ rn rn ol Clrn ol ol rn rn rn o
e �
Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
J o 0 0 o o o o
O M m O O
M K; .�; �-; ,.; v M �; �.; M r; K; r;
�Ce
Q
N
�` N. Q e e o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o e e
h ti FW, O O O O- O O N �/'� �/1 h O 10
O o h O O
Z M e O O O O o+ O 7 r O M M O O
M �+i M m M m V M M M. M M M 'm
0.
y
Ohl F.
Z
[. .o ,o o o .o .Q .o .O 'o .o .o .o .o .0 7
2 a a a a a
aJ N N U N N U V U d N N N
W w w w `n
o o o c o o q o 0 0 0 0 o o.
tz E
(D uv v
h N N N V N N V V N N N N M V V V M
e O O ^
C-1 M O OO O � ^
Q of of of O O ^, ... .+ O O
O O O O O
C p _
y
i V y p Y
F s bn a+ �C a v �
bA e0 Y Y > CQ •� W C
2 Cc
P�j oy Ci o� boa a w c F �d o woxv
�0. h E E .a N Cq c c ° � E m E Y
,
.�'`.. � o C7 u E oXo a o •m E 0 3 C c d E m
O �O a vyyz co
xz m� Z# c V y oa° y c xM
Y r I'd 10
E C" d z n � 2 - S o r y E S e a ay ° p c o c yvo v°a
CO)
v o i `� d a s i :c �i a- �°. — = o o > o° d a
o� zu w3 u.0 win wu Liu a = aH u x u u3 xc� u, wu�
o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1O N O� h N a,
eO O - -� -- ^ N N
O
45
ol Cl
ao o v r oo vi vi o ren � m v ri V �`; V?
W Z
Z �
y
O �
O Oof
�
W W M Yl O C7, 01 ol (71 ol 91 til M V V O o1 V V ,
O N O O O O O O O T O O O O O O O
p O O O O O O O O O O O Cl
�L Ly r o co o0 00 o vi ni r= o a` rn Q\ C, P ol a,
C,VlIq
M m N M N
V Z c c a c c. cO
rc jf No 2 c a c
0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 C C 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 C
W w C, v a o rn rn rn v rn o rn rn M Clol
V M M N M N
Q �
W
c e o 0 o a e o o a o e
J 01 0 o 0 0 0 0 O (71O `^ O
M o m N
m ri- v ri �+i m e+i ri �i rri ri �i ri ri v'i v v
W O �
O W oo
N lgtl c c e c o c o e o e o o e a o e e c
O O O O N M O M N
er t
Q, ti V Ln
ed N G ¢
V c Q c Qe �c Q Q
W
a= 0 10 10
= 1
0 10 10 10 10
d o A
V) V) o a O Cl) o 0
Q F Q F Q Q Q C F Q
N itl - N N td U tG 4�U+ E 0 V
> > > > >
o v o d m o 0 0 d 0 o v u. o 0
U C7 U CD U U U C7 C7 U C7 C7 U U C7 U U
hv v v M M m m m M m m M M m o 0 0
e W o o o o o o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
-N !o
N- N
0 ^ O V V'1 10 10 10 r 0 O O O O O O -
O O O O O O O O
a c �
o V V
i p
'WI
C Col
C
Or m �v c� co Oa ao ° o
a
�
w
Uh v>G uX c S drn w 0 drn urn
ti y d # m d v p sk ae o at qt i ai se A a
�O p 3 •e� C7 ` ti W« i L �, 7. p. �. i per, 61 wj y 1,,,
C
wu u Ia u � d a sd ° a �+ ' y o
.�w wU ¢a wU uQ'� �U Gcn wU wU Uw wU wU Fd 3v� wU wv� x
ao 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6W. N v o rn o o 00 0 oo v o 0
Q N10
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
K
46
47
W �
-
r
,D
r
V'
•-
N
00
V
00
00
V
V
O
N
P
0`
�•
y1.
N
4L W
O
O
OC,
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Cl
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
rn
O
O
O
o
O
O
O
C,
q
D
o
o
Ol
o+
o
o
N
rn
rn
C,
rn
rn
of
o,
0
G
�
C
C
�
W
'-
a
0
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
W
+J
O
O
O
ao
w
O
O
O
rn
o,
O
OO
O
r'
a
O
O
a,
C,
O
O
O
h
rn
O
O
r
rn
O
O
o
O
C
O'
C,
C,
O
'O
o
Cl
O
O
v
C,
O
O
v
o
O
O
o
O
O
rn
O
O
r
o,
C
O
r`
a,
O
O
o
o
O
O
rn
wQ
In
o
n
o
n
J
o
0
0
o
v
o
o
n
n
v,
,D
,D
n
v1
M
b
O
Vl
`
C
M
V
m
M
V
K
7
m
m
M
M
fit
M
m
7
M
Q q
V N
Q
C?
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
e
- e
e
v�
e
O
o
e
o
Cl
V
O
�'h
'7
M
M
N
•7
O
C'
--
C
`O
^i
,O
r'1.
,O
10
N1
ID
O
e+t
,n
t+1
M
�1
,D
10
M
O
d'.
v1
HT1
~ ,
Z10
p
p
p
O
O'
O,r�--
O
O
O
O
4
O
R
O
4
O
R
O
6
O
R
••��
W
k•1
4
N
q
w
4
N
o
w
N
a
w
N
o
w-
N
ca
w
61
ca
w
U
°'
L
a
w
u
Q
w
d
ca
w
N
ca
w
O
ca
w
N
o
w
N
ca
w
N
ca
w
V
Lnc,
N
A
w
,�`
(Y
O
id
O
m
O
O
m
O
O
ed
q
E
O
I
O
I
O
O
O
u
O
O
u
O
8
q
E
O
u
.�
u
v
tr
m
C
•w'
c
U
U
U
U
U
U
o
C7
C�
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
V
U
h,n
a
vi
v
M
�n
m
m
vi
v
�
a
v
v
v
•�
v
V
O
O
7
O
O
�
O
N
h
O
Q
N
•--
O
N_
N
\i
^
�
O
N
O
��l
O
�
O'
O
O
O
O
O
a
s
o
a s
s
m O
W a
F
m
a
2
0_
WE
RZ
a
o
a p
m
4
o0.
e
c
'o,'�
z
a
F
Z Z
r U
a z..
a s
o
0
Q.
C O•E
W R
O y
., •SJ'
O •C
bll y
etl
W
cpq•
d
x.
F..�
d
O
Z
m
n b
m
w
E o
`,
z
o
o o
d
o
E
o d
a
5
o'a
°Cn
o
Cz
o
V w-
o
�3
ir.
wU
UU
QO
wx
wt7
U
wa
iwn
3v�
wU
UU�
v
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
OR
O
O
ID
O
t`-
OO
7
,D
�_
Ch
N
O
O
.�.
N
R
a
R
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
47
1 _
h r h d' N 1 O oo O N M O
Z
rz
Cl o C,
r vn o0 00 0. oo ClN
N V C, V' I� O W in n W GO vt
N N
°,. Q` D\ 0. °, oo O+ Q`
e Q
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 00 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C O
w vi v; o0 0 oo vi O r � r r O
O
(` N td V1 N t�tl N A ttl td of N ttl ttl ttl N`d �
-41
4 C
g 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 o O o 0 0 0 C C
U j ol rn 0 rn a rn o rn rn rn rn rn rn rn o ° °
e J
O o 0 ol
ri
v n O o O
ren
�at1 O e
IZI
0 o v O v v v v rn
Q � Q vt vt Vt N 1� Q
n (�. M M m M M V M R d' •f C. d' M M d � L
Id
0 10
L
W
10 10 10 0 0
0, p y 0• 6 10 . 0. y y aCi aai V C v Q Q
)
O Q Q Q
w Q Q N Q Q Q Q Q A o a
E F w wL wn w w
.42
'o
u LM
u v c� U U
a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
e W o g o g o g O o e o a o
P f0�1 m � M Q N O O Q N M
C C = ^ ° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4
a
L id
ci
61 F
a a en
O � � C1 � Mcl o
�� �Um67
o
C ti E d E m W a d� �w
^+ 3 m ° o °. `� 92
O E 7 U x M O UO
° ° oo u �� .L.
o o d a a o a o
[-a �� wU mH Z,v� 3m wU win 'xz OU �Q cG> U�
4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ?0 o
-O C, N O � O O NR 2
..+ al
O
0 0 O O O O O O O O
O O O O O O O O
0
C-4
[L) V]
Vt
r
N
O
N
N
V
N
N
Qr
rv.
U
O�
•�
a0
N
b
O
.�..+
W w
7
N
N
V
ry
C
O
oo
r
C
r
'N
�n
M
r
�+1
r
V
N
00
O
O
M
r
•-•
Vi
7
�
N
N
e
fig
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
M
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Cl
O
O
O
Ol
O
O
P
O
O
T
O
O
D`
O
O
O,
O
O
N
O
O
O+
C,
O
O
D`
`O
r
�
N
O
C,
O
O
O.
O
O
P
O
O
P
V �
y
0
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
ol
O
Cl
O
C,O
Cl
Cl
O
O
O
O
oo+
O
O
or+
O
O
O
obi
O
a
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
D`
O
� ..
0
0
o
a
o
0
0
0
o
0
0
o
a
e
o
o
e
v1
N
O
1
00
V1
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
N
N
-It
V
R-
•d'
C
7
�.�
{�
ti
v
oo
O
h
O
O
v
O.
O
-It
Cl
O
v
V1
O
a
o
c
v
v
vi
Z
W V
ti
°
.oa.
0a
a
a
.�
.4
.Q
a
o
a
o.
a .
n.
W
Q
Q
Q°'
N
C
y
o
0
0
0
ro
14
K
b
u
U
U
U
C7
U
U
U
U
U
C7
U
U
C7
U
C7
U
U
0
0
[�.
0
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
N
rn
C O
_O
O^1O
^
Q2
^
N
N
••-
O
O
O
N
N
N
N
O
N
O
O
O
y
Y
Q
m
O
m
C
Y¢
p 1
yc
:
w
c
e
•�
m
e
a
E
Aw
c
��
09-4
nen
A
o.
C
m
u�.
UA
•�t
r�
0
#
N U
OY
m
�d
^
C
E>
c
i?
A.0
o v
a° g
C•b0
�OM#
a!p
CO
d
O N
d D➢
'10
E
N '
L
O J
.7.
•O O
3
d .�-
L N
m
d ice-
w U
iE
m y
.0
U ¢�
5 m
u c7
U o
w U
3
3
¢ u"
w x
w U
x
U
w U
w
rn
rn
ol
rn
rn
h
W
01
0o
O
in
t�
O�
00
V1
D\
10
Q
10
^
of
N
QN
N
^
N
^
M
N
M
N
V
^
Vl
N
V1
^
�D
N
O
r
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
CD
O
O
49
W o o v co C o ^ N of
N O M ? ry V
j V �
M Q\ h M oro vl 10 O� VNl
W W M V M V V r 10 N V V
00
zr
Q e
0 0 o o
Cl n o0 0 0 0
LL, lZi1 co .6 10-
7
Cl
� w
4 C
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cl 00
0 0 0 0 0 0 C C o
O, N P D\ O N °' O
N
Q �
� Q
H9
a o 0 0 0 o o e o e e o
N O 00 7 f+1 O wi
LQ
0' N e e o e
C !W. 0 I 0 0 0 0 0
�J F. rn e Vt O O h N � N M O N
til Q. C N 7 vi wi
tjy
.73 10
w z
til
Z
v v u v ° CL Q q m q q V)
W q q q N q � v. Vl Q G o a
{Y O O
U U U V U U U C7 U
Q W o o v'o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
00 0
C O r r C p p O O O O
O O
10,
4
.01
0 V)
o �vWy)
�4 C7 U
�E.�i
x
mx ww wU mw oav, ow wU u wU z wv
a c
nl Vt O O N O M N
O O
O O O O
b
M
M
0
vi
00
O
�.1
a
a
m
°
o
u
O
r
N O
I`
G
c
O
d
v
r
14
{
O
O
N
�
N❑
4 Q
bs
.�
ti
U
v
�
a
T .N
w
a.
C
odo
n.
O
3 w
�a�
QZ'^
QC
d
n
o
14
CL
9+ h
O N
y N
�
p
¢
C
vo
U
c
O
LQ
C
5
o
o �
�
o
� w
y �
U
L p
°
'E
H
m x
bA
51
Li
I*
City of Atascadero
Investments by Type
March 2006
Cash with
Government Securities Fiscal Agent
270/ 0% Other
cernncates of veposn
27%
Investment March 2006
LAIF $ 13,546,686
Certificates of Deposit 8,308,837
Government Securities 8,292,030
Cash with Fiscal Agent 149,161
Other 2,083
$ 30,298,797
Page i l of 14
52
On Demand
45%
City of Atascadero
Investments by Maturity
March 2006
One Month
to One Year
53 Page 12 of 14
� 0
I*
City of Atascadero
Investments by Custodial Agent
March 2006
0%
Custodial Agent March 2006
State of California $ 13,546,686
Other 52,117
Union Bank 16,550,833
Bank of New York 149,161
$ 30,298,797
Page 13 of 14
ork
i rnia
54
City of Atascadero
Investment Yield vs. 2 -Year Treasury Yield
For the Month Ended March 31, 2006
5.00%
4.50% --- - -----------
4.00°i° - - - - - - ------ --- .--= =
3.50% - ---- -- - --',,
3.00%�+cn""�r�'
2.50% -- - ----------
2.00% -- --r- ---
1.50% - --- --- ----- ---
1.00% - - ------
10.50% - -._ _ _---------- -- ---
i ,
a .
1 0.00%
Oh O� Oh Oh Oh Oh Oh O� 00 Oh 00 00 Oro
O O O O O O O O O O O O O
,a�Jac1
"City Yield 2 -Yr Treasury Yield
55 Page 14 of 14
r�
0 �
2 -Yr
Treasury
City Yield
Yield
March 2005
April 2005
2.99%
3.65%
May 2005
3.08%
3.64%
June 2005
3.28%
3.64%
July 2005
3.34%
3.87%
August 2005
3.45%
4.04%
September 2005
3.54%
3.95%
October 2005
3.60%
4.27%
November 2005
3.71%
4.42%
December 2005
3.79%°
4.40%
January 2006
3.88%
4.40%
February 2006
3.97%
4.67%
March 2006
4.03%
4.73%
55 Page 14 of 14
r�
0 �
ITEM NUMBER: A-4
DATE: 05/09/06
i Q i9 e
d t���+��®rn i'ity t'n� �nni►
Staff Report - Public Works Department
Interchange Operational Improvement Study
Consultant Services Contract
RECOMMENDATION:
Council authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with Whitlock &
Weinberger Transportation, Inc. known as, W -Trans, for an Interchange Operational
Improvement Study.
DISCUSSION.
US Highway 101 runs through the heart of Atascadero with El Camino Real paralleling
it. The interchanges over US 101 are narrow two lane bridges with no turn pockets for
left hand turns onto the freeway ramps. Frontage road are in close proximity to the
ramps. All this combines to cause a poor level of service and congestion for the
traveling public.
The conventional way to improve the traffic flow through an interchange is to widen the
bridge and realign the ramps. The cost for this improvement is in the tens of million
dollars and rising, as shown in the continuing increasing cost for the US 101' /SR 41
Interchange Project.
A cost effective way to help to improve the flow of traffic on an interchange is with
operational improvements. Operational improvements are changes in the signing and
striping, increasing sight distance, moving ramps away from the bridges to allow
controlled turning movements, closing or controlling frontage roads, construction of
round -a -bouts -or signals at the ramp heads and other improvements. These
improvements will not fix all of the circulation problems on the interchanges, but they will
provide a better level of service.
56
ITEM NUMBER: A-4
DATE: 05/09/06
Staff sent out a Request for Proposals for the Operational Improvements to Interchanges.
We requested the consultant study Santa Barbara, Santa Rosa, Curbaril, Traffic Way, San
Anselmo and Del Rio Interchanges. Four qualified companies returned proposals for this
work. Upon opening the proposals, they were rated on the following aspects, with a
possible of 100 points: past experience in the public sector (20), adequacy of
professional staff and depth of firm resources (15), scope of services to be provided by
the firm (20), past experiences in the design of similar facilities (15), ability to meet
project schedule (10), fee for work (20).
Based on these criteria a firm called W -Trans had the highest overall score. This firm
specializes in Operational Improvement Projects. The proposed cost of their services is
$153,960.00. Staff recommends that the City enter into a contract with W -Trans.
FISCAL IMPACT:
REVENUE
2005/2007 Capital Budget
$120,000
Regional State Highway Account Funds (RSHA)
$50,000
TOTAL
$170,000
Note: The RSHA funds were recently awarded by San Luis Council of Governments and are not in the
current budget.
EXPENSES
Contract Costs
$153,960
Administration
$14,000
TOTAL
$167,960
ALTERNATIVES:
Do not Award Contract. There would not be an Interchange Operational Improvements
Traffic Study done.
57
u
•
ITEM NUMBER: A-5
DATE: 05/09/06
191i i 19 6
Atascauero City Council
Staff Report - Public Works Department
Temporary Road Closure
Del Rio and Obispo Roads
RECOMMENDATION:
Council approve the request from Dave Spurr Excavating for the temporary closure of
portions of Del Rio Road and a partial closure of Obispo Road.
DISCUSSION:
Construction of a sewer main extension on the portion of Del Rio Road between EI
Camino Real and Obispo Road is required for service to newly constructed homes on
Obispo Road. The width of Del Rio Road is not sufficient to safely allow for
construction equipment and one lane of flagman -controlled traffic, as would be
considered ideal.
The Contractor anticipates that the construction in Obispo Road can be accomplished
with a lane closure and flagging. In the event that site conditions do not allow partial
closure, full closure will be required for an estimated three to four day period and the
required detour signage will be installed.
The request is for closure of the roadway from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., May 22"d thru
June 9th. As a condition of approval, the contractor will be required to install
informational signs a minimum of one week in advance giving notice of the closure.
Traffic will be detoured as indicated on the attached map.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENTS: Aerial map
•
•
•
ITEM NUMBER: A-6
DATE: 05/09/06
A tascadero City Council
Staff Report - Public Works Department
Temporary Road Closure
Palma Avenue
RECOMMENDATION:
Council approve the closure of Palma Avenue from East Mall to West Mall during the
Father's House organization event in the Sunken Gardens on June 3, 2006, from 11:00
a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
DISCUSSION:
The Community Services Department has approved rental of the Sunken Gardens for a
carnival BBQ and concert to be held by the Father's House organization on Saturday,
�a, from 11:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. In order to minimize impact to the turf
June 3area, staff
is requesting the closure of this section of Palma Avenue to allow for set-up on the
roadway. Closure of this section of Palma will have minimum impact to traffic
circulation.
FISCAL IMPACT:
$160.00 for the installation of Road Closed signs by.Public Works Staff.
ATTACHMENTS:
Road Closure Map
60
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 05/09/06
n
1918 170
Staff Report - Community Development Department
Appeal 2006-0008 of
Front Yard Fence Height Variance 2005-0009
(9186 Palomar Avenue)
(Appeal of Planning Commission approval of a variance allowing a recently
constructed six-foot high solid wood fence to remain within the front yard
setback within a single-family residential neighborhood)
RECOMMENDATION:
Council adopt Draft Resolution A granting Appeal 2006-0008 (denying Variance 2005-
0009) based on findings.
REPORT -IN -BRIEF:
This is a request to appeal Planning Commission approval of a Variance allowing a
recently constructed six-foot high solid wood fence to remain within the front yard
setback within a single-family residential neighborhood.
PC VOTE: 5 - 2 (Commissioner O'Keefe and Beraud dissenting) approving
Variance 2005-0009
The City received a formal code violation complaint from a neighbor immediately after a
6 -foot high fence was constructed within the front yard of a single-family residence
located at 9186 Palomar Avenue. Other than on lots over one -acre in size, the zoning
code only allows a front yard fence to be a maximum of 3 feet in height. After being
contacted by Code Enforcement, the owner, Mr. Roy, consulted with planning staff for
options. Staff made it clear that the fence could not be approved. Mr. Roy insisted on
applying for a variance if his fence -was not approved. Staff consistently explained to
Mr. Roy that variance findings could not be made and any such application would result
in denial However, Mr. Roy applied for variance. At no time did staff encourage Mr.
Roy to apply, submit fees, or suggest that the Commission would approve the variance.
Planning Commission discussion focused on debating the findings for variance vs. the
fact that the fence was already constructed and that the house wasconstructedwith
bedrooms facing the street. No findings for approval were made in the motion to
approve the variance.
62
At the subsequent Planning Commission meeting, the Commission voted 4-2 (Jones
absent) to adopt findings of variance approval. There was no discussion or
determination for any of the required findings.
An appeal of the Planning Commission's approval is being forwarded to the City Council
to review the basis by which each of the Findings for approval was made. The
appellant believes the Findings for approval cannot be based on the fact that:
(1) The fence has already been constructed;
(2) Other illegal fences may occur in the neighborhood;
(3) Mr. Roy believes he was misguided by code enforcement staff; and Community
Development staff.
During the Planning Commission hearing, one of the Commissioners raised the
possibility that the fence may be located in the street right-of-way. The City Engineer
has completed a survey of Palomar Avenue and determined the fence is located in the
street right-of-way and not on Mr. Roy's property.
Situation and Facts:
1. Appellant: Joan O'Keefe, 6907 EI Camino Real, Atascadero, CA
2. Project Location: 9186 Palomar Avenue, Atascadero, CA 93422
(San Luis Obispo County) APN 029-201-026
3. General Plan Designation: Single -Family Residential —Y (SFR -Y)
4. Zoning District: Residential Single -Family -Y (RSF-Y)
5. Existing Use; Single -Family Residence
6. Environmental Status: Categorical Exemption 15305. Minor Alterations in
Land Use Limitations.
DISCUSSION:
Background: In July 2005, the City of Atascadero received a complaint concerning the
construction of a solid wood fence located within the front setback within a single-family
residential neighborhood located at 9186 Palomar Avenue. According to the applicant,
the fence was constructed to replace mature landscaping which had previously provided
a solid screen to the applicant's front yard (Refer to photos below). The applicant was
not aware of the City's Zoning Ordinance which prohibits fencing beyond 3 -feet tall
within the front yard setback at the time of construction.
Without knowledge that 'the fence was constructed in the City right-of-way, Staff
discussed issues with the applicant and recommended potential remedies in lieu of.the
front yard fence including:
63
(1) Lowering the fence height to 3 feet;
• (2) Constructing a privacy fence behind the front setback;
(3) Planting a tree or shrub in the area of concern; or
(4) Installing vertical or horizontal window blinds and/or curtains.
In addition, staff, made it clear that the existing fence could not be approved as a
variance application.
The applicant has rejected all staff recommendations and has applied for a variance
under the belief that the fence is imperative for their bedroom privacy and staff is
incorrectly interpreting the Atascadero Municipal Code for granting a variance approval.
On February 7, 2006, the application was forwarded to the Planning Commission for
denial as the existing fence is in direct violation of the Atascadero Municipal Code and
in its present form and location is not an item subject to a variance application. The
Planning Commission discussed several issues regarding the applicant's privacy issue,
the property line/fence location, and the legal requirement for a variance. The
Commission voted 6 -0 to continue the item to February 21, 2006 for additional
information regarding the variance and municipal code issues which are analyzed
below. On February 21, 2006 the Planning Commission voted 5=2 to approve the
variance request.
On March 3, 2006, an Appeal was submitted, requesting that the City Council uphold
staff's recommendation to deny the Variance.
On March 7, 2006, the Planning Commission adopted the required findings on a 5 -2
vote. The Commission did not provide comment on the pending Appeal or the required
Findings but did approve the Findings as listed in their resolution.
In March 2006, The City Engineer completed a survey of Palomar Avenue which
identifies the fence as projecting up to 3 feet into the City right-of-way. Improvements
within the public right-of-way require an encroachment permit with a $720 fee which is
required in the event the fence were to be approved by the City Council.
0
The following specific items were discussed by the Planning Commission and have
been analyzed by staff to aide the City Council in reaching a finding determination for
the proposed project:
(1) Definition of a Variance (Government Code Section 65906): Variances from the
terms of the Zoning Ordinance shall be granted only when, because of special
circumstances applicable to a property, including size, shape, topography, location
or surroundings, the strict application of the zoning ordinance deprives such
property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under identical
zoning classification. Variances are only applied to very unique situations -where no
feasible alternatives exist.
Staff Comment: The variance is a request for additional front window privacy by
which similar arguments could be made for most residential lots. The
characteristics associated with the applicant's property (size, shape, topography,
location and surroundings) are commonly shared with single-family residential
neighborhoods throughout the City. Atascadero residential neighborhood roads
intersect, turn, bend, change direction, and slope up and down. Atascadero
residential homes have front windows and doors that commonly face these
neighborhood streets with landscaping, window curtains and sometimes lower
decorative front yard fencing, often designed for aesthetics and home privacy. The
subject property is not unique to Atascadero and the only special circumstance
associated with this property is that the applicant has already constructed the fence
in question which. is not a qualifying circumstance for a variance.
(2) Variance Findings: Any variance granted shall be subject to such conditions as will
assure that the adjustment thereby authorized shall not constitute a grant of special
privileges. inconsistent with the limitations ,upon other properties in the vicinity and
zone in which such property is situated.
Staff Comment: Again, the characteristics associated with the applicant's property
(size, shape, topography, location and surroundings) and relationship to the
neighborhood roads are commonly shared with single-family residential
65
•
•
neighborhoods throughout the City. The requested adjustment cannot be
considered as a variance as the request constitutes a grant of special privilege as
the subject property and the home front windows are not special or unique to the
single-family residential neighborhoods of Atascadero.
(3) Fence Height Required by Code Section 9-4.128: Fencing within a required front
or corner yard setback in the RSF-Y zoning district can be a maximum of three (3)
feet in height.
Staff Comment: The existing fence must be removed or lowered to 3 -feet in height
within the 25 -foot front yard setback of this property. Staff also notes that the codes
only allows a taller fence in the larger lot (1 -acre or larger) residential
neighborhoods. The City Council recently reviewed these fencing requirements in
2005 and their final determination on fence heights is reflected in the current
fencing code.
(4) Safety/Sight Distance: Street intersections and driveways are reviewed by the City
for sight distance to identify safe vehicular travel where roads and driveways
intersect. Sight -distance is measured at point 3 -feet high at the applicant's
driveway, 12 feet back from the paved road edge, to a distance of 150 feet (for a 25
mph zone) in either direction. The fence shall not impair safe sight distance for
vehicular traffic nor result in any other potential adverse impact on human health
and safety (refer to engineering standard: Minimum Sight Distance for Driveways
and Intersecting Roads with Stop Control).
Staff Comment: The applicant's 6 -foot high fence does not violate this standard.
(5) Similar Enforcement or Requests: Staff receives weekly inquiries regarding fence
height and placement in residential zones. Similar code enforcement cases have
been resolved by the offending property owners either lowering, or relocating, or
removing their non -conforming fences.
Staff Comment: Staff is concerned that this variance will create a precedent that
will undermine enforce of the fencing standards.
(5) Staff was unclear about process: The applicant stated that code enforcement staff
identified the complainant as not residing in the immediate neighborhood, and the
Community Development staff led the applicant to believe that the Variance could
be approved by the Planning Commission.
Staff Comment: Staff consistently explained to the applicant that a variance did not
apply and any such application would result in denial. However, Mr. Roy insisted
on proceeding to convince the Planning Commission otherwise. At no time did staff
encourage Mr. Roy to apply, submit fees, or suggest that the Planning Commission
would approve the variance.
(6) The Fence is Located in the Street Right -of -Way A survey by the City
Engineer has concluded that the fence was actually constructed in the street.
Objects and structures are not permitted in the street right-of-way unless the City
93
Fence
located in
street right-
of-way
has granted an encroachment permit. If the Council upholds the variance then an
encroachment permit would also need to be approved.
Staff Comment: Staff is very concerned about granting both a variance and an
encroachment permit for the fence. The street right-of-way is already narrow and
granting an encroachment permit would limit the City's ability to make street
improvements or install utilities in the future. In addition, this action would set a
precedent for future fence encroachment permits.
67
0 �
1�1
•
IN
Monumen ^a
in Wal(
1
a✓✓
` Parke! 2
A
ur y 8 PM' 99
antral
y�
~C1. VVL .Y
V
FRO�Js �F-=LSO
� 'I
DATE: M/2000
wD.
—31
� EXPIRES ,9"S3GI-tY7
a .." 0
' •
Cr Mp f "
SCALE 1"- 20
THIS'MAP CORREMY'REPRESENTS A SUR4EY MADE BY ME
7�`l) ]MICSDN _
OR UNDER MY DIRECTION IN CONFD RMANCE WITH THE
REQUIREMENTS OF THE PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS ACT
P60G
AT THE REQUEST OF: CITY OF ATASCADERB IN MARCH 2000.
,A3fw�'MIDs1#i iXd 88q�P
CL AND RW
(605)/66-i445
BASED ON
\ I /
FOUND MONUMENTS
KENNETH D. NACSON
LS 5571 EXP: 9-30-2007.,
67
0 �
1�1
•
•
Analysis: As analyzed above, fencing and screening is subject to conform to the Zoning
Ordinance for fence height. Disapproval shall be made when the City Council
determines that the Variance does not satisfy criteria set forth in Government Code
Section 65906 by finding that:
(i) The variance constitutes a grant of special privileges inconsistent with the
limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zoning district in which such
property is situated, or
Staff Comment: The Variance request constitutes a grant of special privilege as
the subject property location and the home front windows are not special or unique
to the single-family residential neighborhoods of Atascadero. The Variance is a
request for special privilege and will set precedence for future non -conforming
fences that are currently resolved by staff through compliance with the municipal
code.
(ii) There are no special circumstances applicable to the property, including size,
shape, topography, location, or surroundings, which would, upon application of this
title, deprive the property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and
in the same zoning district, or -
Staff Comment: The characteristics associated with the applicant's property (size,
shape, topography, location and surroundings) and relationship to the
AM
neighborhood roads are commonly enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and in
the same zoning district. There is no special circumstance associated with this
property.
(iii) The variance would authorize a use which is not otherwise allowed in the zoning
district, or
Staff Comment: this finding does not apply to the request.
(iv) The granting of such variance would, under the circumstances and conditions
applied in the particular case, adversely affect the health or safety of persons, be
materially detrimental to the public welfare, or be injurious to nearby property or
improvements.
Staff Comment: According to the City Engineer, the fence does not interfere with
driveway sight distance per City standards. However, the fence is within the
public -right-of-way and if approved, would require issuance of an encroachment
permit.
Conclusion: The requested Variance application does not apply to the applicant's
existing front yard fence as there is no special circumstance associated with this
property. In addition, the Variance is a request for special privilege and will set
precedence for future non -conforming fences that are currently resolved by staff through
compliance with the Municipal Code. The above stated Findings for Denial of the
request are contained in Draft Resolution A (Attachment 5). If denied, the applicant will
have the ability to modify his fence and/or landscaping in compliance with the
Atascadero Municipal Code.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. The City Council may determine that more information is needed on some aspect of
the appeal and may refer the item back to the appellant, applicant or staff to develop
the additional information. The Council should clearly state the type of information
that is required and move to continue the item to a future date.
2. The Council may deny the appeal and grant an encroachment permit.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment l:
Attachment 2:
Attachment 3:
Attachment 4:
Attachment 5:
Attachment 6:
Attachment 7:
Location and Vicinity Map
Site Plan
Aerial of Property
Site Photographs
Official Survey
Parcel Map
Draft Resolution A
•
•
rM
0
Attachment 1: Location and Vicinity Map
Project Site
9186 Palomar Ave.
General Plan Designation:
-General Plan: Single Family
Residential - Y
Zoning Designation:
-Zoning District: Residential Single -
Family — Y
70
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 05/09/06
Attachment 2: Applicant's Site Plan
Note: Applicant map and rc �� r :. .:.
dimensions are not to scale nor
determined to be correct.
Official survey identifies fence
within Palomar Avenue Right- ~r,
of -Way.
cT 4
T o -
"i _
V1j
771—+
1 ' i
n, f
1 J o i
Oti n
1
71
•
•
� 0
Attachment 3: Aerial of Property
72
6
7 -
[i
I
i
4 LL
1
i
C
SON
'
t
F 11113,
[i
I
i
4 LL
1
i
•
•
•
ATTACHMENT 5: Official Street Survey
74
�fitNQl
Point LAND
DOUCI t y�
JOB: W -036 _
� ..
PROD; 4-456
DATE- 03,%2006
�
� NO. 5571
E KPIRES 9-=30--Ck7
0 20.= 40
ONL"1v
SCALE 1"-"20
/AT
THIS MAI' CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURVEY MADE BY ME
Irl som "m strjw '1"3'
OR UNDER MY DIRECTION IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE,
REQUIREMENTS OF THE PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS ACT
JWX 117MON - LS 5
'X6QRmorim Ail
'THE REQUEST OF CITY OF ATASCADERO IN MARCH 2O00.
ArASCAj)XW CA 934,I',8
CL AND RMI
(906)466-2446
BASES? ON
� "✓
\ j
FOUND MONUMENTS
KENNETH D. WILSON
LS .5571 EXP. 9-30--2007
74
ATTACHMENT 6: Parcel Map
0 �
•
ATTACHMENT 7: Draft Resolution A
DRAFT RESOLUTION A
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING
APPEAL 2006-0008 TO NOT ALLOW A VARIANCE FOR A SIX-FOOT
HIGH FENCE LOCATED WITHIN THE FRONT YARD SETBACK,
APN 029-201-026
(Appellant: O'Keefe)
WHEREAS, an application has been received from Joan O'Keefe, 6907 El Camino
Real, Atascadero, CA 93422), Appellant, to reconsider Planning Commission approval of a
Variance to allow a six (6') foot fence located in the front setback at 9186 Palomar on APN
029-201-026; and,
WHEREAS, the project is exempt from the requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Article 19, Section 15305, Class 5; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Atascadero held a public hearing on
April 11, 2006; and,
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Atascadero, hereby resolves
to take the following actions:
SECTION 1. Findings of Variance Disapproval. The City Council finds that:
(i) The variance authorized does not constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with
the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zoning district in which such property
is situated; and
(ii) There are special circumstances applicable to the property, including size, shape,
topography, location, or surroundings, and because of these circumstances, the application of
this title would deprive the property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity
and in the same zoning district; and
(iii) The variance does not authorize a use which is not otherwise authorized in the zoning
district; and
(iv) The granting of such variance does not, under the circumstances and conditions applied
in the particular case, adversely affect the health or safety of persons, is not materially
detrimental to the public welfare, nor injurious to nearby property or improvements.
SECTION 2. Variance Denial. The City Council does hereby grant Appeal 2006-0008
4 denying Variance 2005-0009 that would have allowed a six (6') foot fence located in the
front setback:
11
On motion by Council Member and seconded by Council Member
, the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the
following roll call vote:
CITY OF ATASCADERO
By:
Tom O'Malley, Mayor
ATTEST:
Marcia McClure Torgerson, C.M.C., City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ITEM NUMBER: B-2
DATE: 05/09/06
n
1918 p Yee
Atascadero City Council
Staff Report - City Attorney
Interim Urgency Ordinance Establishing
A Moratorium on Conversion of Residential Units
To Condominiums
(Temporary Ordinance establishing a moratorium on conversion
of residential units to condominiums.)
RECOMMENDATION:
Council adopt the Interim Urgency Ordinance establishing a moratorium on conversions
of residential units to condominiums. This action extends the moratorium for 10 months "
and 15 days.
DISCUSSION:
Background: On March 28, 2006, the City Council adopted an urgency ordinance that
established a moratorium on conversions of residential units to condominiums. The
urgency ordinance is effective for 45 days, or May 12th. The proposed action would
extend the urgency for ten months and 15 days (to March 27, 2007). This is the
maximum time that Council may extend the moratorium, but as always, the Council
could extend the time for a shorter period of time.
Staff has scheduled an agenda item for the June 14th Council meeting to discuss and
review the condominium conversion ordinance. It is anticipated that the revised
ordinance will be effect before the expiration of the moratorium period. Staff has also
attached a written report on the progress being made to alleviate those conditions that
lead to the adoption of the moratorium.
In the past year, the City of Atascadero has received an increasing number of
applications and inquiries from apartment owners interested in converting their rental
units into for -sale condominiums. The issue was presented to the Council on
SSeptember 9, 2005 and on March 14, 2006, and the Council expressed interest in
exploring ways to control the rate of condominium conversions and to preserve the
City's affordable housing stock.
78
ITEM NUMBER: B-2
DATE: 05/09/06 _
Prior History
Over the years, typically during times when housing prices have been disproportional to
rental levels, there has been an interest by individual property owners in converting
existing rental units to ownership housing. Many communities have responded to the
concerns with regard to these conversions --typically rental housing and tenant
protection issues --through the adoption of condominium conversion regulations. The
City of Atascadero did this in 2000, with the adoption of Chapter 11-12 of the City's
Code. Chapter 11-12 regulates the process for the conversion of apartment to
condominium including the application process, tenant provisions, hearing
requirements, and property improvement standards. The Chapter does not address
controlling the rate of conversions and the preservation of affordable housing stock in
the City.
In 2002, the City Council adopted a General Plan for the City, and the Housing Element
provides:
"Goal HOS 3: Ensure that an adequate amount of rental housing exists."
"Policy 3.1: Ensure that the proportion of low and moderate housing isnot
significantly reduced."
Recently the City retained the firm of Goldfarb Lipman LLP to review the condominium
ordinance. In particular, staff and Goldfarb Lipman LLP is to study and give options to
the Council on reducing the rate of condominium conversions, including requirements
for retention existing affordable housing units and any additional protections for tenants.
The review will also evaluate the development standards and whether CC&Rs should
be required on future condominium conversions. The purpose of the review is to
ensure, as required by the City's General Plan, that the proportion of low and moderate
housing in the City is not significantly reduced.
The City Council may, pending a study of a contemplated zoning proposal, adopt a
temporary interim ordinance, as an emergency measure. Interim ordinances enacting
moratoria and other growth management measures are lawful exercises of the police
power and do not amount to a temporary taking under First English Evangelical Church
v. County of Los Angeles (1987) 482 U.S. 304, 320 so long as they do not "go too far."
In California an interim moratorium ordinance must be adopted pursuant to Government
Code section 65858, which prohibits approval of new development plans so that a City
can re-evaluate its land use policies. The ordinance is lawful provided the period of
delay is reasonable and there are valid governmental reasons justifying its adoption.
(Tahoe -Sierra Preservation Council v. Tahoe Regi Planning Agency (2002) 535 U.S.
302, 353; First English Evangelical Church v. County of Los Angeles, supra at 320.)
The moratorium may be extended for a period of 10 months and 15 days, and then if
necessary for an additional one-year. The absolute maximum time is 2 years. Each
extension requires notice and a hearing by the Council. The ordinance must contain
79
t
•
•
El
10
10
ITEM NUMBER: B-2
DATE: 05/09/06
legislative findings that there is a current and immediate threat to the public health,
safety, or welfare, and that the approval of additional subdivisions, use permits,
variances, building permits, or other applicable uses which is required in order to
comply with a zoning ordinance would result in a threat to public health, safety, or
welfare. Ten days prior to the expiration of the interim ordinance or any extension, the
City Council must issue a written report describing the measures that have been taken
to alleviate the condition which led to the adoption of the ordinance.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
ALTERNATIVES:
• Adopt the attached Ordinance;
• Modify and adopt the attached Ordinance;
• Do not extend the moratorium and therefore, do not adopt the attached
Ordinance;
• Provide direction to Staff.
ATTACHMENT:
Interim Urgency Ordinance
i
ITEM NUMBER: B-2
DATE: 05/09/06
Attachment 1
Urgency Ordinance
DRAFT ORDINANCE
AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO
ADOPTING A MORATORIUM ON CONDOMINIUM CONVERSIONS,
AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF
The City Council of the City of Atascadero DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findings
A. The City's Housing Element to its General Plan provides as one of its
goals that there is an adequate amount of rental housing in the City. Policy 3.1 of the Housing
Element requires that the Council "ensure that the proportion of low and moderate housing is not
significantly reduced."
B. In the last 18 months, the City has seen a significant increase in the
number of multifamily projects requesting a condominium conversion.
C. The City has received applications for the conversion of 60 rentals to
condominiums; and inquiries have been made about the conversion of an additional 200 rental
units.
D. If all of these rental units were converted to condominiums, it would
represent the loss of over 12 percent of the 2,100 rental units in the City.
E. The City Council has retained Goldfarb Lipman LLP to review and study
the City's condominium conversion ordinance regarding the preservation, acquisition of the
City's multifamily rental units, and to examine the need for inclusionary housing and/or fees for
the loss of low and moderate income housing.
F. On March 28, 2006, the City Council adopted an urgency ordinance
declaring a temporary condominium conversion moratorium on review and/or approval of
condominium conversions for buildings, finding it was necessary in order to permit the City the
time to conduct research and consider appropriate regulations, amendments and/or clarifications
to protect the public health, safety, welfare and economic prosperity of the City.
- G. The temporary condominium conversion moratorium was for 45 -days, and
the Council has not had the opportunity to consider or enact any appropriate regulations,
amendments and/or clarifications to the City's Condominium Conversion Ordinance.
H. Due to the foregoing, the City intends to continue to study the extent to
which the conversion of rental units to condominiums are affecting the affordability of rental
units and the impacts of increasing rental prices on very low- and moderate -income residents in
the City. In the meantime, if a temporary moratorium on condominium conversions is not
extended for up to 10 months and 15 days, substantial rent increases are likely to occur. Such
81
r�
L
•
•
ITEM NUMBER: B-2
DATE: 05/09/06
increases would defeat the intent and purpose of the City's General Plan policy of protecting the
proportion of low and moderate housing in the City.
I. A final report from Goldfarb Lipman, LLP has not been received;
however, the consultant and the City Council have preliminarily concluded that the conversion of
a significant number of multifamily units to condominiums in the City will produce economic
inequities which may be exacerbated by a lack of rental units.
Section 2. Imposition of Moratorium
The City Council hereby declares that a temporary condominium conversion
moratorium on the review and/or approval of the condominium conversions for buildings is
necessary in order to permit the City the time to conduct research and consider appropriate
regulations, amendments and/or clarifications to protect the public health, safety, welfare and
economic prosperity of the City.
Section 3.
While this Ordinance remains in effect, no permit, other applicable entitlement,
which entails in whole or in part the conversion of any existing rental housing or on residential
structures to residential condominiums or community apartment projects within the City shall be
issued, except as specified in Section 13 below.
Section 4.
While this Ordinance remains in effect, no person, firm, partnership, association,
corporation, company or organization of any kind shall convert, in whole or in part, or attempt to
convert, in whole or in part, any existing rental housing to residential condominium within the
City, except as specified in Section 13 below.
Section 5.
Pursuant to the provisions of California Government Code section 65858, this
Ordinance is adopted as an urgency interim zoning ordinance and shall take effect immediately.
The facts demonstrating the urgency that forms the basis for this ordinance are as follows:
A. According to the City's General Plan adopted in 2002, in 2001 there were
approximately 9,663 total housing units in the City. Of this total, there were approximately,
3,062 units in multi -family structures (31.7% of all City housing) and 3,282 renters. According
to the 2000 Census data, there were approximately 9,531 households, 3,282 or 34% of which
were renters;
B. The City has most recently experienced an unprecedented increase in
applications seeking to convert existing rental housing to residential condominiums;
C. The approval or adoption of additional such condominium conversions
within the City of Atascadero would result in a threat to public health, safety and welfare in that
they could alter, in a radical and fundamental manner, the current way of life for the City's
residents. By their unique characteristics and requirements, conversion projects tend to magnify
the effects associated with higher urban densities to the point where public health, safety,
welfare, and economic prosperity of the City are significantly affected. Such projects may
conflict with the City's policy, set forth in the General Plan, to provide a reasonable balance of
82
ITEM NUMBER:
DATE:
B-2
05/09/06
rental and ownership housing within the City, to provide a variety of individual choices of tenure,
type, price and location of housing andtomaintain the supply of rental housing for low and
moderate income persons and families. It is thus necessary to establish a temporary moratorium
to allow for: (1) research and study to determine how to address this use, the type of regulation
that may be imposed on this use, and the potential impact this use may have on the City's
neighborhoods; and (2) the preparation and presentation of any proposed ordinance, amendments
or regulations to address this use.
D. It is necessary that this Ordinance go into effect immediately in order to
maintain the City's environment pending the outcome of the above -referenced research, study,
and analysis, which may dictate the need to further regulate such condominium conversions and
which, in turn, will help the City Council better understand the detrimental effects, if any, should
such condominium conversions be allowed to proceed at a pace which, based on past experience,
conversions will continue to occur but for the adoption of this interim ordinance;
E. It is necessary that this interim Ordinance remain in effect until the afore
referenced research, study and analysis have been completed and the recommendations of
Planning Department staff and the Planning Commission can be received and considered by the
City Council and the City Council, in turn, can consider amendment of the City's Condominium
Conversions Ordinance or otherwise regulate future conversions.
Section b.
The City Council therefore finds that there is a current and immediate threat to the
public health, welfare, and that the approval of additional condominium conversions through the
issuance of permits authorizing such activities would result in a threat to, or breach of, that public
health and welfare.
Section 7.
The City Council hereby finds that adoption of this Ordinance will not have the
effect of denying approvals needed for the development of projects with a significant component
of multifamily housing.
Section 8.
Pursuant to Government Code Section 36937(b), this interim urgency Ordinance
shall take effect immediately upon its passage and adoption.
Section 9.
Pursuant to Government Code Section 65858, this Ordinance shall expire on a
date 10 months and 15 days following the date of its passage and adoption, unless its term is
extended by action of the City Council in accordance with the procedures set forth in Section
65858, or at such earlier time as the City Council acts to repeal this Ordinance and replace it with
a successor Ordinance.
Section 10.
At least ten days prior to the expiration period provided for in Section 9, the City
Council shall issue a written report describing any measures taken to alleviate those conditions
herein referenced which lead to the adoption of this Ordinance.
83
0 �
I *
I *
C-1
ITEM NUMBER: B-2
DATE: 05/09/06
Section 11.
This Ordinance or a comprehensive summary thereof shall be published once in a
newspaper of general circulation in the City of Atascadero within 15 days after its adoption.
Section 12.
The adoption of this interim ordinance is exempt from the California
Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to sections 15061(b)(3), 15262 and 15306 of the
State CEQA Guidelines because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that such
adoption may have significant effect on the environment; such adoption involves only feasibility
and planning studies for possible future adoption of an ordinance that has not yet been prepared
or adopted. In addition, the adoption of this interim ordinance is partially exempt from CEQA
pursuant to Section 15303 of the CEQA Guidelines in that it primarily pertains to the conversion
of existing small structures from one use to another where only minor modifications are made in
the exterior of the structure.
Section 13.
This Ordinance shall apply to all applications filed on or after March 1, 2006.
Section 14.
This Ordinance shall be liberally construed to accomplish its intended purposes.
Nothing contained in this Ordinance is intended to limit the continuation of lawful
nonconforming uses or structures.
Section 15.
Severability. The City Council hereby declares that should any section,
paragraph, sentence, phrase, term, or word of this Ordinance hereby adopted be declared for any
reason to be invalid, it is the intent of the City Council that it would have adopted all other
portions of this Ordinance irrespective of any such portion declared invalid.
ITEM NUMBER: B-2
DATE: 05/09/06
INTRODUCED, PASSED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting by the City Council of the City
of Atascadero, State of California, on May 9, 2006 by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ATTEST: CITY OF ATASCADERO
Marcia McClure Torgerson, C.M.C., Tom O'Malley, Mayor
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Patrick L. Enright, City Attorney
85
•
0
•
Attachment 2
Condominium Conversion Status Report
ITEM NUMBER: B-2
DATE: 05/09/06
UITY OF ATASCADERO
Memorandum
COMMUNITY DELI ELOPMEVT DEPARTMENT
Date:
Wednesday, April 26, 2006
to:
p%t Enri.ght, City Attorney
cc:
From:
Warren Frace, Community Development Director
Subject:
Condominium Conversion Ordinance Status
The City Council first heard this item on March 14, 2006 at which time, the Council
directed staff to enact an emergency moratorium for 45 days, until the item could be
brought back to the Council for further discussion.
Staff has attempted to A , i this item, but due to the complexity of the issue, it is
apparent that the Council will need ample time to explore all the issues and options and
to hear members of the public wishi ng to speak on this topic.
In addition, the City's consultant will be speaking at housing conferences in the
Sacramento area and is unavailable until after May 24, 2006.
At this time, staff has tentatively scheduled this item for the City Council meeti ng of June
13th, 2006. At that time, it is anticipated the Council will provide staff with direction to
prepare a draft ordinance and complete the environmental review necessary for
implementation of the ordinance.
0
t
ITEM NUMBER: B - 3
DATE: 05/09/06
Atascadero City Council
Staff Report - Fire Department
Weed/Refuse Abatement Program
RECOMMENDATION:
Council adopt the Draft Resolution, declaring vegetative growth and/or or refuse a public
nuisance, commencing proceedings for the abatement of said nuisances, and placing
all abatement fees on the San Luis Obispo County Special Tax Assessment for the
Fiscal Year 2006-2007 Tax Roll.
DISCUSSION:
The Municipal Code, Section 6-13.03, addresses the -abatement of vegetative growth
and/or refuse, which constitute a hazard. Adoption of the proposed Resolution is the
first step in this annual program, which requires City Council action. The Fire
Department conducted its. initial.inspection. duringthe month of April. There are
approximately 10,376 parcels within the City, and this year 2,946 parcels were identified
to have vegetative growth and/or refuse, which are or may become a public nuisance.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The City recovers costs for administering this program through the 150 administrative
fee, which is placed on the San Luis Obispo County Special Tax Assessment for the
fiscal year 2006-2007 Tax Roll.
ATTACHMENTS:
Draft Resolution
Vegetative Growth Notice
Vegetative Growth / Refuse Notice
88
DRAFT RESOLUTION
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING VEGETATIVE GROWTH
AND/OR REFUSE A PUBLIC NUISANCE
WHEREAS, the City of Atascadero Fire Department is commencing proceedings for the
abatement of said nuisances; and
WHEREAS, will be placing all abatement fees on the San Luis Obispo County Special Tax
Assessment for the Fiscal Year 2006-2007 tax roll,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Atascadero:
SECTION 1. That vegetative growth and/or refuse are a public nuisance and hereby declare to
be such for the reasons that vegetative growth may attain such a large growth as to become a fire
menace and/or drainage restriction, when mature, and said refuse may become a public nuisance,
thereby creating a hazard to public health.
The City Council of the City of Atascadero finds and declares that vegetative growth and/or
refuse on specified parcels of property are seasonal and recurrent nuisances. Such seasonal and
recurrent nuisances shall be abated in accordance with the provisions of City and State laws. No
further hearings need to be held, and it shall be sufficient to mail a notice to the owner of the
property as their address appears upon the current assessment roll.
SECTION 2. A description of the parcel of lots of private property upon which, or in front of
which, said nuisances exist, according to the official Assessment Map of said City of Atascadero,
shall be posted annually in the office of the City Clerk and referred to as Exhibit A (Vegetative
Growth) and Exhibit B (Weeds & Refuse).
SECTION 3. The City Clerk or designee is hereby ordered and directed to mail written notices
of the proposed abatement to all persons owning property described in accordance with Section
6-13.08 of the Atascadero Municipal Code.
SECTION 4. Pursuant to Section 6-13.10 of the Atascadero Municipal Code, the City Council
shall hear and consider all objections or protests to: the required removal of said vegetative
growth and/or refuse. The City Clerk shall post a copy of the public hearing notice in
accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act.
SECTION 5. Pursuant to Section 6-13.17 of the Atascadero Municipal Code, if the owner does
not abate the hazard, it will be abated by the city contractor. The cost of the abatement plus a
150% administrative fee and county fee will be assessed upon the county property tax bill, and
constitute a lien upon such land until paid.
89
On motion by Council Member and seconded by
• Council Member , the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted
in its entirety on the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ADOPTED:
ATTEST:
Marcia McClure Torgerson, C.M.C., City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
i
Patrick L. Enright, City Attorney
lie
CITY OF ATASCADERO
By:
Tom O'Malley, Mayor
EXHIBIT "A" ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
91
J
•
EXHIBIT `B ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
� 40
May 10, 2006
City of Atascadero
Fire Department
NOTICE
Dear Atascadero Property Owner:
IF YOU RECEIVED THI5
YOU ARE IN VIOLATION OF THE WEED ABATEMENT ORDINANCE
THIS IS NOT SENT TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS IN THE CITY OF ATASCADERO.
Weed abatement season has arrived and parcel inspections were performed throughout the City
during the first two weeks of April. The City's Municipal Code, Section 6-13.08, requires this
notification, which enables the Fire Department to abate dry noxious weeds in an effort to make
our neighborhoods safer in the event of a fire.
THE DEADLINE FOR COMPLIANCE IS JUNE 9, 2006
DISREGARD THIS NOTICE IF YOU HAVE CUT YOUR WEEDS AND
WE THANK YOU FOR YOUR ASSISTANCE IN MAKING
THE CITY OF ATASCADERO SAFER DURING THE FIRE SEASON.
NOTICE TO DESTROY VEGETATIVE GROWTH (NOXIOUS WEEDS)
Notice is hereby given that on the 9a' day of May 2006, the City Council passed a resolution
declaring that vegetative growth (noxious weeds) constitutes a fire hazard, which must be abated
by the cutting of said vegetative growth (noxious weeds). If the owner does not comply within
30 days of the date of this letter (June 9, 2006) it will be abated by the city, and the cost of the
abatement will be billed to the property owner directly, or assessed upon the county property tax
bill, and will constitute a lien upon such land until paid. The City recovers costs for
administering this program through a 150% administrative fee. Reference is hereby made to the
resolution for further particulars and Municipal Code, Section 6-13.01. A copy of said resolution
is on file in the office of the city clerk.
All property owners having eany objections to the proposed removal of the hazard are hereby
notified to attend a meeting of the City Council of the City of Atascadero to be held May 23,
2006 at 7:00 p.m., when their objections will be heard and given due consideration.
Dated: This 10th day of May 2006. /s/Kurt W. Stone
Fire Chief
City of Atascadero, California
6005 LEWIS AVENUE — ATASCADERO, CA 93422 — (80.5) 461-5070 — FAX (805) 466-2907
. 93
0
0 �
The deadline for weed/refuse abatement compliance is June 9, 2006
On June 10, 2006, the City's contractor begins the abatement process for parcels that are not in
icompliance. The contractor's fees, as well as applicable City and County fees/fines are assessed
on the County's tax roll.
The Fire Chief has established the following requirements:
CLEARANCE REQUIREMENTS
OF VEGETATIVE GROWTH (NOXIOUS WEEDS)
a) Maximum height of 4 inches;
b) Located within 100 feet of any building or structure, or to the
property line, whichever is nearer;
c) Located within 50 feet from the edge of any improved roadway;
d) Located within 50 feet from each property line;
e) Located within 10 feet on each side of driveways.
EXEMPTIONS:
a) Animal pastures and agricultural fields growing hay or grains. The interior portion of fenced
pastures where the quantity of livestock significantly reduces the vegetative growth, therefore
bringing the parcel into compliance. Agricultural fields must be cut at harvest time. Uncut
hay and grain is subject to abatement.
b) Habitat for endangered or threatened species or any species that is a candidate for listing as
an endangered or threatened species by the State of California or Federal Government.
c) Land kept in a predominantly natural state as habitat for wildlife, plant, or animal
communities.
d) Open space lands that are environmentally sensitive parklands.
e) Other lands having scenic values.
Abatement requirements shall remain in effect in waterways where flood preparation measures
and emergency flood control mitigation is necessary.
1) This exemption applies whether the land or water are held in fee title or any lesser interest.
This exemption applies to any public agency, and private entity that has dedicated the land or
water areas to one or more of those purposes or uses, or any combination of public agencies
and private entities making that decision.
2) This section shall not be construed to prohibit the use of properly authorized prescribed
burning to improve the biological function of land or to assist in the restoration of desired
vegetation.
3) In the event that any lands adjacent to land or water areas, as described above, are improved
such that they are subject to this chapter, the obligation to comply with Section 6-13.04 shall
be with the person owning, leasing, controlling, operating, or maintaining the occupied
dwelling or occupied structure on the improved lands. All maintenance, activities, and other
fire prevention measures required by Section 6-13.04 shall be required only for the improved
land, and water areas as described above.
Questions regarding weed abatement may be directed to 805-470-3300 or by writing to: City of
Atascadero, Fire Department, Fire Marshal, 6005 Lewis Ave., Atascadero, CA 93422.
PLEASE RETAIN THIS NOTICE FOR ANY RELATED COMMUNICATIONS
May 10, 2006
City of Atascadero �
Fire Department
NOTICE
Dear Atascadero Property Owner:
IF YOU RECEIVED THIS
YOU ARE IN VIOLATION OF THE WEED ABATEMENT ORDINANCE
THIS LETTER IS NOT SENT TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS IN THE CITY OF ATASCADERO
An inspection was made on the above stated parcel and your property was identified to be in
violation of Municipal Code, Section 6-13.01-17 and Uniform Fire Code (UFC) Section
1103.2.4. The City's Municipal Code, Section 6-13.08, requires this notification, which enables
the Fire Department to abate all vegetative growth and refuse that may create a fire or health and
safety hazard(s) in our neighborhoods. We have identified Vegetative Growth/Refuse.
NOTICE TO REMOVE
VEGETATIVE GROWTH (NOXIOUS WEEDS) AND REFUSE
Notice is hereby given that on the 9a' day of May 2006, the City Council passed a resolution
declaring that vegetative growth (noxious weeds) and refuse constitute a fire hazard, and health
and safety hazard, which must be abated by the cutting of said noxious weeds, and removal of
said health and safety hazard. If the owner does not comply within (30) calendar days of the date
of this letter (June 9, 2006), it will be abated by the city, and the cost of the abatement will be
billed to the property owner directly, or assessed upon the county property tax bill, and will
constitute a Tien upon such land until paid. The City recovers costs for administering this
program through a 150% administrative fee. Reference is hereby made to the Resolution for
further particulars and Municipal Code, Section 6-13.01. A copy of said Resolution is on file in
the Office of the City Clerk.
All property owners having any objections to the proposed removal of the health hazard are
hereby notified to attend a meeting of the City Council of the City of Atascadero to be held on
May 23, 2006 at 7:00 p.m., when their objections will be heard and given due consideration.
Dated: This 10'h day of April 2006
/s/ Kurt W. Stone
Fire Chief
City of Atascadero, California
If you have any questions, please contact the City of Atascadero
Fire Department at 805-470-3300
95 6005 LEWIS AVENUE — ATASCADERO, CA 93422 (805) 461-5070 — FAX (805) 466-2907
•
•
•
Atascadero City Council
Staff Report - City Manager's Office
Downtown Parking & Business Improvement Area
(FY 2006-2007)
Confirmation of Annual Assessment
ITEM NUMBER: B-4
DATE: 05/09/06
RECOMMENDATION:
Council adopt the Draft Resolution confirming the annual assessment for Downtown
Parking & Business Improvement Area (Fiscal Year 2006-2007).
DISCUSSION:
Background: The City of Atascadero established a Downtown Parking and Business
Improvement Area in 1986 (Chapter 11 of the Atascadero Municipal Code) for the
purpose of acquisition, construction .or maintenance of parking facilities, decoration of
public places, promotion of public events, and general promotion of business activities
in the downtown area. The formation and operation of a Business Improvement Area
is governed by the California Streets & Highways Code (Section 36500 et. Seq.)
Historically, the budget for the Business Improvement Area is submitted in conjunction
with the City's annual budget.
In each of the last five fiscal years from 2001, through 2006, the Council confirmed the
annual assessment for the Downtown Parking & Business Improvement Area, and
contracted with Atascadero Main Street, Inc., to administer the Downtown Parking &
Business Improvement Area funds for downtown improvement activities and events.
Atascadero Main Street received $9,500 fiscal year 2001-2002, $10,500 fiscal year
2002-2003, $10,500 fiscal year 2003-2004, $10,500 fiscal year 2004-2005, and
$10,500 for 2005-2006.
Analysis: The Streets & Highways Code requires that the "advisory board" provide a
report to the City Council annually for the expenditure of funds derived from the
assessment paid by businesses in the downtown area. The Atascadero Main Street
Board of Directors functions as the "advisory board". The report identifies the proposed
v� improvements and activities for the area, based upon the National Main Street
Program's four -point approach. The report does not propose any changes to the area
or of the assessment. The Downtown Parking and Business Improvement Area
assessments collected by the City are estimated at approximately $10,500 annually. .
96
ITEM NUMBER: B-4
DATE: 05/09/06
The recommended action would confirm the assessment and collection of these funds
for downtown revitalization activities for 2006-2007.
City Code Section 3-11.09 permits the City to enter into an agreement with an agency
to expend District revenues consistent with City regulations. The City of Atascadero
contracts with Atascadero Main Street, Inc., to expend the Downtown Parking and
Business Improvement Area finds received by the City. The Atascadero Main Street
Board of Directors are proposing expenditures for 2006-07 with the Downtown Parking
and Business Improvement Area funds as follows:
BIA Funds requested for 2006-2007 $10,500
Carry over from 2005-2006 $ 0
Total Proposed Funding Available $10,500
2006-2007 Proposed Expenditures:
Signage & Banners $ 1,500
Membership Directory $ 1,500
Streetscape Maint./Improvement $ 1,500
Parking/Lighting/Art Coordination $ 1,000
Winter Wonderland Street Fair $ 4,000
Sweetheart Stroll (Valent'ine's Day) 1,000
Total Proposed Expenditures for 2006-07 $10,500
Fund Residual $ 0
The City Council adopted a draft Resolution of Intention on April 25, 2006, and seta
public hearing for May 9, 2006 to receive public comment. Following the public hearing,
the Council can adopt a Resolution confirming the report as originally filed or as
changed by the Council. Adoption of the resolution constitutes the levying of
assessment.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Revenue of approximately $10,500 for Fiscal Year 2006-2007.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. The City Council may not confirm the resolution to levy the assessment, thereby
eliminating the revenue and funding of Main Street.
2. The City Council may grant Atascadero Main Street, Inc., the Downtown Parking
and Business Improvement Area assessment funds in an amount lower than
recommended.
3. The City Council may redirect the Downtown Parking and Business Improvement
Area assessment funds and cancel the contract with Atascadero Main Street, Inc.
Alternatives 1, 2 and 3 are not recommended because planned downtown revitalization
efforts would be reduced or eliminated.
ATTACHMENTS: Draft Resolution
97
is
•
DRAFT RESOLUTION
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO CONFIRMING DOWNTOWN
PARKING AND BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT AREA ASSESSMENT FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2006-2007
WHEREAS, the Atascadero Main Street, Inc., Board filed a report with the City in
accordance with Section 36533 of the Streets & Highway Code of the State of California; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council having received the report adopted Resolution
declaring intent to levy annual Downtown Parking and Business Improvement Area
assessment pursuant to Section 36534 of said code; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council did fix a time and place for a public hearing on the levy
of the proposed assessment for fiscal year 2006-2007; and,
WHEREAS, on May 9, 2006, the City Council conducted a public hearing at the date
and time for such purpose; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council did not receive the required number of protests for the
levy of such assessment.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Atascadero does hereby confirm approval of the Section 36533 Report as originally filed and
conformation of approval of such report constitutes the levy of an assessment for fiscal year
2006-2007, pursuant to the Streets & Highway Code of the State of California.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council directs staff to make
appropriations in the City's budget in accordance with such report.
On motion by Council Member .
buy Council Member
hereby adopted following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINED:
ADOPTED:
ATTEST:
By:
Marcia McClure Torgerson, C.M.C.
City Clerk
, and seconded
the foregoing Resolution is
CITY OF ATASCADERO
Tom O'Malley, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By:
Patrick L. Enright, City Attorney
ITEM NUMBER: C-1
DATE:
05/09/06
R
Isla 1 e
r �t
Atascade o City Council
Staff Report - Community Development Department
Signage Task Force Report
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Council:
1. Direct staff to update the City Sign Ordinance to incorporate the Signage
Task Force's recommended changes; and,
2. Direct staff to work with the Chamber of Commerce and Main Street
Association on a signage clean-up information campaign while the
ordinance update is in process.
DISCUSSION:
Background: Staff presented a signage clean-up report to the City Council on February
28, 2005. In the report, staff outlined some of the common sign ordinance violations
that occur with banner and A-frame signs. Following public testimony and deliberations,
the Council requested a task force comprised of members of the Chamber of
Commerce, Main Street Association and staff be assembled. The purpose of the
Signage Task Force was to review the existing sign ordinance requirements for banners
and A-frame signs and report back to the Council with recommendations on how to
update these sections of the sign ordinance.
The Signage Task Force has met three times and has concluded its review. The Task
Force's recommendations to the Council are contained in the attached letter. The
recommendations are based on interviews with local merchants and a review of the City
of San Luis Obispo and Paso Robles sign ordinances.
Banner Sign Recommendations
• Time Frame: allow banners up for 30 days then down for 60 days
• Quantity: allow one (1) banner per public street frontage
100
• Mounting: banners must be secured flat against a building or secure
structure.
• Exceptions: Banners may remain up during the entire sign permit and
installation process.
• Public Info: Provide business owners notification if banners can be
converted into permanent signs especially along freeways.
A -Frame Sign Recommendations
• Quantity: allow one (1) A -frame sign per street frontage
• Size: maximum size shall be two (2) feet wide by four (4) feet tall
• Location: A -frame signs must be located on business's property.
• Exceptions: encroachment permits are required for A -Frame signs
located in the public right-of-way.
(The City should allow a 90 -day amnesty period with no fee
for encroachment permits of existing A -frame signs.)
Analysis: Staff attended all of the Signage Task Force meetings and participated in the
discussion regarding the sign ordinance changes. In staff's opinion, the changes to the
banner ordinance are minor, logical and will improve -the sign ordinance.
The changes to the A -frame regulations are a significant change from the existing
regulations. Underthecurrent ordinance, A -frame signs are not permitted. The current
prohibition of A -frame signs has not been enforceable for a variety of reasons in the
past.The Task Force's A -frame recommendations are very similar to the City of San
Luis Obispo's regulations for A -frame signs. In staff's opinion the Task Force's
recommendation appears to be a reasonable compromise that would allow A -frame
signs but provide controls about where and how they are placed in the public sidewalk.
If the Council directs staff to update the sign ordinance, it would likely take 90 to 120
days before the new regulations would become effective. Staff would recommend
during this time, a public information campaign to encourage voluntary signage clean-
up. The campaign should be a joint effort among the City, Chamber of Commerce and
Main Street Association.
ATTACHMENT:
Signage Task Force Correspondence
101
1�
17'v "
Aprll 17,'2446
jib
City"of1�ascadem -
Mayer Bc pity,Coueil
6947 Ei"Cuino 1"
Atascadem, CA=93422
Dear Honorable' Council Mamba=s;
'Che Sign t?rdinanceTask Force rnet ou two different occasions ta.dtsausx
The
argn aildnance.nsit
tains t9 BWmcrs;aW A-F-w,Signs The comrruttec mcnri�ers are; Maid':5`tir
1`I+YIeinbcrs, Steve n,'
Greg C ,H, LeAwt Davis, Bob Wtllr m and Chamber embers, 7aaune "Main "Carol McCoiley and
Cordelia Perry, Warton Fraee attended as welt
The committee:�nembws serrvveyect 5tl.businmm with regard"twbau=B and A Fm= S, M ifi s tile,
tecommewlation, of the committee to change the signo�as follows:
Banner.Sip$:
*Allow bauaers uP for N Days:then dowcli'or 60 darys
* l banner per pr�lic"street frarrtage: ;, -
A���
e�`4
*Bamrw�"txibesfdatagadnsts�uskhnl:dr�iue:s�nctnr�a.
*Banners may remain during sil o piarrntt:a d instaftalion,pmcess
GW%0 •Zamino Regi
iftsca4em-O. ii 3422
A-FfameSrglts:
1805}'4662444
* l per street dsontagc"adioa�d
*8i ti? be:2 feat wideby 4 ;[retktll:
_� *"Slgu mush Bio sanbrss ct#�' ,
*Eucroaciuntant ru►its ate ti%ran negniirrarne:SIP, cdtad=isY�pulii%c right=cif-way
A,ppli oasxo'be, essatixu2"�eeksbyti,e'` ilia odps"i�ej
rtu>ent .
*37nuin thc"9(l day pmeesstug to,have the ordinance'm"piece,
applies �ulll i ve tltr, 5134 #ee�varucid:
for an encraaclmertrtperrasf
The committee also aecormmeiuis uotifyirrg btrsir that have banners the cattbe:donvertedurtn per,
manent sigtm, particti1arly on the 'a3'
i3 FC i Cernino Real
{fir education will telae plane t`fuuugh maim Streetand Chambermciabei vslcttess as ta:ti above,
Atzacadera, Ci4'83422 ....
gos if approvedby'the Cound
E805) 462-0177
itis also snggesteihta create a flyer listingtiie d►ffereirt ngtions a lrusrnesacan rrse:frvw"themast expcu= ,
siveto least eitpeusivc stslutians for their signagerrecrls.
The Task Force wants to reserve the sigbt to be caiiat, up4n#n revu a other elemx�ufs of the
"
t]rxlinarice, flee" aspect of particrsiar merest is to ut�'the"dacirarter� txrnsistard"thmugh outwith easy.to.,"
vn&tstand language
Thaakyouhr'Oving this group cfbusi.nm people the oppactua'ity to assist tt C ttyin TWkWing
Sign;C3xdwance.
�espeCtFuddy".Submitted,_
mw Maim SteveMartin
PmWenUCBDExecutive i ireator
Atascadeno`Cliamberof'C,ornmonx At scsdem Made Street
w
1�
ITEM NUMBER: C-2
DATE: 05/09/06
r
iais
A
CADS
Atascadero City Council
Staff Report - City Manager's Office
Cardroom Ordinance
Request for Expansion of Tables
(Outlaws Card Parlour)
(Request from the owner of Outlaws Card Parlour to increase the
number of card tables from two (2) to five (5).)
RECOMMENDATION:
Council give staff direction on how to proceed on this request.
DISCUSSION:
In 2005 the legislature amended Gambling Control Act to authorize a City or County to
amend its Ordinance, without voter approval, to increase the number of tables allowed
in a gambling establishment up to 24.99%, or two tables, whichever is greater, when
compared to the number operated on January 1, 1996. (Business &- Professions Code
section 19961.05) Also, the City may amend the Ordinance without the approval of the
electors to:
• increase by 24.99% or less the number of gambling tables in the City;
• increase by 24.99% or less the number of licensed cardrooms;
• increase by 24.99% or less in the number of gambling tables that may be
operated in a gambling establishment in the City;
• authorize additional forms of gambling, other than card games, that may be
legally played in the state
• increase by 24.99% or less in the hours of operation;
• increase by 24.99% or less the maximum amount permitted to be wagered in a
game.
Presently, the City has one cardroom operator, Outlaws Card Parlour, who operates two
card tables in the establishment. Mr. Brown, the owner of Outlaws Card Parlour, has
recently inquired to the Community Development Department about increasing the
number of tables in his establishment to five (5) tables, as a result of the passage of the
2005 legislation.
104
ITEM NUMBER: C-2
DATE: 05/09/06
Background: The City adopted a cardroom ordinance in 1992, which was amended in
1999. This ordinance authorizes a maximum of five (5) card tables to be licensed and
operate within the City, and limitsthe. number at any one establishment to two (2) card
tables.
The City Council may amend the Municipal Code to authorize up to four (4) card tables
in a single establishment, without putting the matter on a ballot of the voters. Prior to
adopting any amendment to the Code relating to gambling establishments, the City
must submit the proposed ordinance to the Division of Gambling Control for review and
comment. if the City desires to increase the number of tables to more than four, an
ordinance would have to be submitted to the voters for approval. However, the
Gambling Control Act places a moratorium on the authorization of legal gambling and
any expansion of gambling until 2010.
The legislature, in enacting the Gambling Control Act, indicated its intent to have state
and local agencies provide uniform, minimum standards of permissible gambling
activities and the operation of lawful gambling establishments. As long as it is not
inconsistent with the Act, any city or county has the authority to prohibit any gambling
activity, impose more stringent local controls or conditions upon gambling than are
imposed by the Act or by the commission. The City may also inspect gambling
premises to enforce applicable state and local laws, impose a local tax or license fee,
and enact, amend, or enforce any local ordinance relating to license gambling
establishments.
Under the Gambling Control Act, no new gambling establishment may be opened in a
city or county in which . a gambling establishment was not operating on or before
January 1, 1984, except upon the affirmative vote of the electors of that city or county.
Therefore, the City may amend the , Municipal Code to increase the number of card
tables at any establishment to four, but not to five as requested. In addition, in any
amendment to the cardroom ordinance, the City should review the other provisions in
the ordinance, including hours of operation, games played, and any fees or taxes
imposed.
FISCAL IMPACT:
If the City Council amended the Municipal Code to allow additional card tables, the City
would receive a one time revenue of $300 per additional table.
ITEM NUMBER: C-3
DATE: 05/09/06
All
iais o is e
Atascadero City Council
Staff Report - Public Works Department
Hwy 101/41 Interchange Value Analysis Study
RECOMMENDATION:
Council receive a verbal report from Caltrans on the results of the Hwy 101/41
Interchange Value Analysis Study and recommend they proceed to further explore two
options and report back on May 23rd.
DISCUSSION:
Background: The Highway 101/41 Interchange is a significant regional hub for travel
from the central valley to the coast, and from Northern California to Southern California.
Also, this interchange serves local residents commuting within Atascadero. The 101/41
Interchange is operating at a poor level of service during peak hours, and traffic is
backing up on local roads and the Hwy 101 ramps. This is caused by theincreasein
the volume of traffic using the interchange.
The City prepared a Project Study Report (PSR) in 1994 to investigate changes to the
interchange that would provide a better level of service. Modification to the Interchange
was funded in the 1998 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) and
Caltrans began environmental review and design. The estimated construction cost was
$4.8 million and right-of-way was $1.1 million.
Caltrans studied the traffic volumes using the interchange in 2000 and found them
much higher than expected. This caused Caltrans to redesign the project by adding
another lane under Hwy 101 The construction cost then escalated to $11.1 million. An
additional $7.0 million was added to the project in 2002 to cover this increase.
The project stalled between 2002 and 2004 due to the California Transportation
Commission (CTC) not allocating funding to proceed with the right-of-way. From 2004
to the present construction prices have exploded. Concrete and steel prices are at an
all time high. $3.68 million were added to the project in February 2006 to make the
project fully funded. In late March 2006 Caltrans completed another construction cost
estimate on the project and found that the current projected costs are as follows:
106
ITEM NUMBER: C-3
DATE: 05/09/06
Planning and environmental support: $1.75 million
Design $3.10 million
Right-of-way support $1.35 million
Construction support $1.65 million
Right-of-way capital $4.01 million
Construction cost $20.5 million
Total $32.36 million
This means an additional $11.14 million dollars is needed to make the construction and
right-of-way fully funded and $3.26 million is needed to fully fund support costs. At their
April meeting the San Luis Council of Governments (SLOCOG) Board approved the
following:
1) Add $6.0 million to the construction and right-of-way fund.
2) Put off funding $3.26 million in support costs to the 2008 STIP.
3) Perform a Value Analysis (VA) study on the project to look for costs saving.
4) Continue the right-of-way acquisition for the project.
5) Get the project out to bid as soon as possible.
This leaves $5.14 million in construction and right-of-way costs unfunded.
To address the short fall SLOCOG Board recommended a Value Analysis (VA) study
be performed. A "VA" study is a short high intensity study that uses a specialized
focused team to break the project apart to look for cost saving while still keeping the
intent of the project intact.
Summary: The VA study team met from April 20 to April 25, 2006 and came up with
two options that could save the unfunded construction and right-of-way costs. They are:
1) Constructing three bridges instead of one bridge over SR 41, using asphalt instead
of concrete on Hwy 101, removing color from the concrete structure and closing the
northbound Hwy 101 onramp during construction.
2) Do not replace the Hwy 101 Bridge and construct round -a -bouts where SR 41
intersects the south bound ramps and El Camino Real. They also recommended the
closure of the north bound Hwy 101 onramp during construction.
Caltrans would like to further analyze these two options and report back to the City
Council on May 23rd.
Analysis: Staff supports option # 1 with the following concerns and questions:
• Will inflation of construction costs erode the saving due to the length of time for
redesign?
• What are the traffic impacts to Atascadero on the closure of the north bound Hwy
101 onramp during construction?
Staff recommends that both these concerns be addressed by Caltrans.
ALTERNATIVES: Direct Caltrans to explore one or neither of the options.
107